0001499505agro:SugarEthanolandEnergyMemberagro:MaintenanceAndRepairsMember2020-01-012020-12-31
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FormFORM 20-F
|
| | | | | | | |
| ¨ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| OR | |
| þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED ON DECEMBER 31, 20192021 |
| OR | |
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO ________________ | |
| OR | |
| ¨ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| Date of event requiring this shell company report | |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-35052
Adecoagro S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
N/A
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Vertigo Naos Building, 6, Rue Eugène Ruppert,
L - 2453 Luxembourg
Tel: +352.2644.9372
(Address of principal executive offices)
Aurelien CorrionManuela Lamellari
Vertigo Naos Building, 6, Rue Eugène Ruppert,
L - 2453 Luxembourg
Email:aurelien.corrion@intertrustgroup.com manuela.lamellari@intertrustgroup.com
Tel: +352.26449.167+352.26449.494
(Name, Telephone, E-Mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
| Common Shares | AGRO | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
The number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital stock
as of December 31, 2019:2021:
117,086,050111,096,772 Common Shares, par value $1.50 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act
Yes ¨þ No þ¨
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,"”accelerated filer,”and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer¨ | Non-accelerated filer ¨ |
| | Emerging growth company¨ |
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ¨ International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board þ Other ¨
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about us and our industry. These forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “is/are likely to,” “may,” “plan,” “should,” “would,” or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements included in this annual report relate to, among others:
•our business prospects and future results of operations;
•weather and other natural phenomena;
•the length and severity of the recent novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak;pandemic;
•developments in, or changes to, the laws, regulations and governmental policies governing our business, including limitations on ownership of farmland by foreign entities in certain jurisdictionjurisdictions in which we operate, environmental laws and regulations;
•the implementation of our business strategy;
•our plans relating to acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances or divestitures;
•the implementation of our financing strategy and capital expenditure plan;
•the maintenance of our relationships with customers;
•the competitive nature of the industries in which we operate;
•the cost and availability of financing;
•future demand for the commodities we produce;
•international prices for commodities;
•the condition of our land holdings;
•the development of the logistics and infrastructure for transportation of our products in the countries where we operate;
•the performance of the South American and world economies;
•the relative value of the Brazilian Real, the Argentine Peso, and the Uruguayan Peso compared to other currencies; and
•the factors discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this annual report.
These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that our expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, our expectations may turn out to be incorrect. Our actual results could be materially different from our expectations. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the estimates and forward-looking statements discussed in this annual report might not occur, and our future results and our performance may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, including, but not limited to, the factors mentioned above. Because of these uncertainties, you should not make any investment decision based on these estimates and forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
Certain Defined Terms
In this annual report, unless otherwise specified or if the context so requires:
•References to the terms “Adecoagro S.A.S.A,”, “Adecoagro”, “we”, “us”, “our”, “Adecoagro,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company”; and “our company” refer to, Adecoagro S.A., a corporation organized under the form of a société anonyme under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, and its subsidiaries.
•References to “IFH” and “IFH LP” mean the former International Farmland Holdings, LP, a limited partnership, (previously IFH LP and International Farmland Holdings, LLC, or IFH LLC). which was merged into Adecoagro LP.
•References to “Adecoagro LP” mean Adecoagro, LP SCS, a limited partnership organized under the form of a société comandite simple under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (previously Adecoagro LP and Adecoagro, LLC).
•References to “$,” “US$,” “USD,” “U.S. dollars” and “dollars” are to U.S. dollars.
•References to “Argentine Pesos,” “Pesos” or “Ps.” are to Argentine Pesos, the official currency of Argentina.
•References to “Brazilian Real,” “Real,” “Reais” or “R$” are to the Brazilian Real, the official currency of Brazil.
•Unless stated otherwise, references to “sales” are to the consolidated sales of manufactured products and services rendered plus sales of agricultural produce and biological assets.
•References to “IFRS” are International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and the interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”), together “IFRS.”
Background
As part of a corporate reorganization (the “Reorganization”), Adecoagro, a Luxembourg corporation under the form of a société anonyme, was formed as a holding company for IFH for the purpose, among others, of facilitating the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of our common shares, completed on January 28, 2011. Before the IPO, Adecoagro had not engaged in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and the Reorganization. For an additional discussion of the Reorganization, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—History.”
During 2011, we contributed the net proceeds of the IPO to increase our interest in IFH from 98% to 98.64%. During 2012, we issued, in a series of transactions, 1,654,752 shares to certain limited partners of IFH in exchange for their residual interest in IFH, totaling 1.3595%, thereby increasing our interest in IFH to approximately 100%. During 2015 IFH was merged into Adecoagro LP, our wholly-owned subsidiary. For further information please see "Item 4 - “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and developmentDevelopment of the Company - General Information"Company—History”.
The Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 (hereinafter, the “Consolidated Financial Statements”) included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. All IFRS effective at the time of preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements have been applied.
Description of accounting policies changed during 2019 and 2018
Adoption of IFRS 16 - Leases
For fiscal years beginning on January 1st, 2019 the adoption of IFRS 16 - Leases was mandatory. We disclose in Note 35.1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements the new accounting policies that have been applied from January 1, 2019, where they are different to those applied in prior periods.
The Company has adopted IFRS 16 Leases from January 1, 2019 following the simplified approach, but has not restated comparative figures for previous reporting period as permitted under the specific transition provisions in the Standard. The reclassifications and the adjustments arising from the new lease accounting rules are directly recognized in the opening balance sheet on January 1, 2019. The weighted average incremental borrowing rate applied to lease liabilities recognised in the statement of financial position at the date of the initial application was 7.06%.
On adoption of IFRS 16, the Company recognized lease liabilities in relation to leases which had previously been classified as ‘operating leases’ under the principles of IAS 17 Leases. In the previous years, the Company only recognized lease liabilities in relation to leases that were classified as "Finance leases" under IAS 17 Leases. For the initial recognition, these liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate as of January 1, 2019.
In order to evaluate the effect of adoption IFRS 16 as at January 1, 2019, please see "Note 35.1 to our consolidated financial statements."
The new accounting policy for leases under IFRS 16 is as follows:
Leases are recognized as a right-of-use asset and a corresponding liability at the date of which the leased asset is available for use. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance cost. The finance cost is charged to profit or loss over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The right-of-use asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life and the lease term on a straight-line basis.
In determining the lease term, the Company considers all facts and circumstances that create an economic incentive to exercise an extension option, or not exercise a termination option. Extension options (or periods after termination options) are only included in the lease term if the lease is reasonably certain to be extended (or not terminated).
Short term leases are recognized on a straight line basis as an expense in the income statement. Please see "Note 35.1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements."
Accounting for Farmland Valuation
During 2018, we have adopted the revaluation model for our farmlands that are recognized under property, plant and equipment. Farmlands are valued at Fair value. Previously, we valued all of these assets using the cost model. These amendments have resulted in an increase of property, plant and equipment of US$ 545 million as of December 31, 2018. This higher valuation resulted in an increase of the deferred tax liability of US$ 139 million. This change in accordance with IAS 16, is applied prospectively. The higher valuation, net of its tax effects, is reflected in the Shareholders' equity under the line item "Revaluation surplus".
Also we adopted the revaluation model for our investment property. The higher valuation resulted in an increase in retained earnings of US$ 45 million; an increase in investment property of US$ 40 million as of December 31, 2017, and an increase in deferred tax liability of US$ 12 million. This change was applied retrospectively, in accordance with IAS 8. Consequently, prior year figures have been restated.
Financial reporting in a hyperinflation economy
IAS 29 “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies” ("IAS 29") requires that the financial statements of entities whose functional currency is that of a hyperinflationary economy to be adjusted for the effects of changes in thea suitable general price index and to be expressed in terms of the current unit of measurement at the closing date of the reporting period. Accordingly, the inflation produced from the date of acquisition or from the revaluation date, as applicable, must be computed in the non-monetary items.
In order to determineconclude on whether an economy is categorized as hyperinflationary under the terms of IAS 29, the accounting standardStandard details a series of factors to be considered, including the existence of a cumulative inflation rate in three years that approximates or exceeds 100 %.
DuringSince 2018, Argentina experienced a significant increasewhen cumulative inflation rate in inflation, whichthree years exceeded the 100% three-year cumulative inflation rate. Also, the remaining indicators support the conclusion that Argentina shouldthreshold, Argentina’s operations are considered to be considered aunder hyperinflationary economy for accounting purposes. Accordingly, commencing July 1, 2018, we started applyingpurposes under the terms of IAS 29 and since then, it has been applied IAS 29 in the financial reporting of ourits subsidiaries and associates using Argentine peso as the functional currency. We will to continue to apply IAS 29 until such time as the cumulative three-year inflation rate is equal to or less than 70%. During 2019, the threshold of less than 70% was not achieved, and as a result we continue applying inflation accounting. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations - Description of recent changes to our accounting policies."
Financial statements of a foreign entity with a functional currency of a country that has a highly inflationary economy, are restated to reflect changes in the general price level or index in that country before translation into U.S. Dollars. In adjusting for hyperinflation, a general price index is applied to all non-monetary items in the financial statements (including equity) and the resulting gain or loss, which is the gain or loss on the entity's net monetary position, is recognized in the income statement. Monetary items in the closing statement of financial position are not adjusted. The Company treated all Argentine subsidiaries as being subject to a hyperinflationary economy as all of them have Argentine peso as functional currency. The results and financial position of all foreign entities with a functional currency of a country that has a highly inflationary economy are translated at closing rates after the restatement for changes in the general purchasing power Argentine peso.
The inflation adjustment on the initial balances was calculated by means of conversion factor derived from the Argentine price indexes published by the National Institute of Statistics, with a year-over-year change in the index of 1.538.
The main procedures for the above-mentioned adjustment are as follows:
Monetary assets and liabilities which are carried at current amounts at the balance sheet date are not restated because they are already expressed in terms of the monetary unit current at the balance sheet date.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities which are not carried at current amounts at the balance sheet date, and components of shareholders' equity are adjusted by applying the applicable price index.
All items in the income statement are restated by applying the applicable price index.
The effect of inflation on the Company’s net monetary position is included in the income statement, in "Other financial results" .
The ongoing application of the re-translation of comparative amounts to closing exchanges rates under IAS 21 and the hyperinflation adjustments required by IAS 29 will lead to an additional difference on top of the difference arising out of the adoption of hyperinflation accounting.
The comparative figures in the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in a stable currency are not adjusted for subsequent changes in the price level or exchange rates. Accordingly, there is an initial difference, arising on the adoption of hyperinflation accounting, between the closing equity of the previous year and the opening equity of the current year. The Company recognized this initial difference directly in equity.
Segment reporting information.
The measurement principles for the Company’s segment reporting structure are based on the IFRS principles adopted in the interim financial statements through June 30, 2018. Since the adoption of IAS 29 on July 1, 2018, the measurement principles for the Company’s segment reporting structure are based on the IFRS principles adopted in these financial statements, with the exceptions disclose below.
Total segment assets and liabilities are measured in a manner consistent with that of the Consolidated Financial Statements. These assets and liabilities are allocated based on the operations of the segment and the physical location of the asset.
Effective July 1, 2018, we applied IAS 29. (See "— Financial reporting in a hyperinflation economy").
According to IAS 29, all Argentine peso-denominated non-monetary items in the statement of financial position are adjusted by applying a general price index from the date they were initially recognized to the end of the reporting period. Likewise, all Argentine peso-denominated items in the statement of income are expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period. Consequently, income statement items are adjusted by applying a general price index on a monthly basis from the dates they were initially recognized in the financial statements through the end of the reporting period. This process is called “re-measurement”.
Once the re-measurement process is completed, all Argentine peso denominated accounts are translated into U.S. Dollars, applying the guidelines in IAS 21 “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”(“IAS 21”). IAS 21 requires that amounts be translated at the closing rate at the date of the most recent statement of financial position. Accordingly, monthly results of operations in Argentine pesos, after adjustment for inflation pursuant to IAS 29, must then be converted into U.S. dollars at the closing exchange rate for such monthly reporting period. This process is called “translation.”
The re-measurement and translation processes are applied on a monthly basis until year-end. Due to this process, the re-measured and translated results of operations for a given month are subject to change until year-end, affecting comparison and analysis.
Following the adoption of IAS 29 with respect to our Argentine operations, management revised the information reviewed by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM"). Accordingly, from July 1, 2018 the information provided to the CODM departs from the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 re-measurement and translation processes by adjusting for inflation the segment results operations for each reporting period and translating them into the Company’s reporting currency using the reporting period average exchange rate. The translated amounts were not subsequently re-measured and translated in accordance with the IAS 29 and IAS 21 procedures outlined above. From January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018, the Company’s segment results were still based on the IFRS measurement principles adopted until June 30, 2018.
In order to evaluate the economic performance of businesses on a monthly basis, results of operations in Argentina are based on monthly data that have been adjusted for inflation and converted into the average exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar each month. These figures are not subsequently readjusted and reconverted as described above under IAS 29 and IAS 21. It should be noted that this translation methodology for evaluating segment information is the same method as the one used by the Company to translate results of operation from its other subsidiaries from other countries that have not been designated hyperinflationary economies because it allows for a more accurate analysis of the economic performance of its business as a whole.
The Company's CODM believes that the exclusion of the re-measurement and translation processes from the segment reporting structure allows for a more useful presentation and facilitates period-to-period comparison and performance analysis.
IFRS 8 requires that segment information be reported on the basis of the internal reports that are regularly reviewed by the entity's CODM to evaluate the company’s operating results. The Company’s CODM does not evaluate monthly results of operation according to the presentation obtained from the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 as described above because it is considered more useful and accurate that monthly results remain unchanged once translated.
Therefore, the measurement of reported figures in the segment presentation differ from the measurement of the figures reported in the statement of income in the manner described above.
Below is a reconciliation of Segment Information to the Statement of Income that clarifies the difference between the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 in the Statement of Income and in the reported Segment Information for the years ended 2019 and 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy |
| | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 168,938 |
| | (2,492 | ) | | 166,446 |
| | 102,162 |
| | (1,006 | ) | | 101,156 |
| | 84,767 |
| | (945 | ) | | 83,822 |
|
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (159,197 | ) | | 2,687 |
| | (156,510 | ) | | (74,480 | ) | | 529 |
| | (73,951 | ) | | (77,532 | ) | | 838 |
| | (76,694 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 30,290 |
| | (549 | ) | | 29,741 |
| | 13,194 |
| | (979 | ) | | 12,215 |
| | 13,741 |
| | (231 | ) | | 13,510 |
|
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,542 |
| | 283 |
| | 1,825 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 41,573 |
| | (71 | ) | | 41,502 |
| | 40,876 |
| | (1,456 | ) | | 39,420 |
| | 20,976 |
| | (338 | ) | | 20,638 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (5,446 | ) | | (87 | ) | | (5,533 | ) | | (6,752 | ) | | 147 |
| | (6,605 | ) | | (4,188 | ) | | 90 |
| | (4,098 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (12,852 | ) | | 128 |
| | (12,724 | ) | | (21,072 | ) | | 498 |
| | (20,574 | ) | | (6,252 | ) | | 18 |
| | (6,234 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | (1,133 | ) | | (225 | ) | | (1,358 | ) | | 282 |
| | (15 | ) | | 267 |
| | (635 | ) | | (68 | ) | | (703 | ) |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 22,142 |
| | (255 | ) | | 21,887 |
| | 13,334 |
| | (826 | ) | | 12,508 |
| | 9,901 |
| | (298 | ) | | 9,603 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (4,662 | ) | | (137 | ) | | (4,799 | ) | | (6,994 | ) | | 171 |
| | (6,823 | ) | | (5,064 | ) | | 98 |
| | (4,966 | ) |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 |
| | All other segments | | Corporate | | Total |
| | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 3,904 |
| | 27 |
| | 3,931 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 891,554 |
| | (4,416 | ) | | 887,138 |
|
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (3,412 | ) | | (40 | ) | | (3,452 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (675,187 | ) | | 4,014 |
| | (671,173 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | (40 | ) | | 53 |
| | 13 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 70,295 |
| | (1,706 | ) | | 68,589 |
|
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,542 |
| | 283 |
| | 1,825 |
|
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 452 |
| | 40 |
| | 492 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 288,204 |
| | (1,825 | ) | | 286,379 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (167 | ) | | 17 |
| | (150 | ) | | (19,319 | ) | | 428 |
| | (18,891 | ) | | (57,797 | ) | | 595 |
| | (57,202 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (171 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (182 | ) | | (165 | ) | | 23 |
| | (142 | ) | | (107,628 | ) | | 656 |
| | (106,972 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | (956 | ) | | 602 |
| | (354 | ) | | (175 | ) | | 21 |
| | (154 | ) | | (1,137 | ) | | 315 |
| | (822 | ) |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | (842 | ) | | 648 |
| | (194 | ) | | (19,659 | ) | | 472 |
| | (19,187 | ) | | 121,642 |
| | (259 | ) | | 121,383 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (181 | ) | | 4 |
| | (177 | ) | | (20 | ) | | 3 |
| | (17 | ) | | (174,578 | ) | | 139 |
| | (174,439 | ) |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | (927 | ) | | 602 |
| | (325 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (927 | ) | | 602 |
| | (325 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy |
| | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 164,538 |
| | (9,120 | ) | | 155,418 |
| | 100,013 |
| | (4,610 | ) | | 95,403 |
| | 33,201 |
| | (3,491 | ) | | 29,710 |
|
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (165,988 | ) | | 9,052 |
| | (156,936 | ) | | (75,739 | ) | | 766 |
| | (74,973 | ) | | (31,488 | ) | | 3,361 |
| | (28,127 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 36,422 |
| | (7,755 | ) | | 28,667 |
| | 8,967 |
| | (4,842 | ) | | 4,125 |
| | 7,295 |
| | (1,840 | ) | | 5,455 |
|
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 2,704 |
| | (3,613 | ) | | (909 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 37,676 |
| | (11,436 | ) | | 26,240 |
| | 33,241 |
| | (8,686 | ) | | 24,555 |
| | 9,008 |
| | (1,970 | ) | | 7,038 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (4,239 | ) | | 37 |
| | (4,202 | ) | | (5,070 | ) | | (869 | ) | | (5,939 | ) | | (2,034 | ) | | (246 | ) | | (2,280 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (5,921 | ) | | 474 |
| | (5,447 | ) | | (15,465 | ) | | 1,375 |
| | (14,090 | ) | | (983 | ) | | 41 |
| | (942 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | 5,422 |
| | 1,741 |
| | 7,163 |
| | 275 |
| | (58 | ) | | 217 |
| | (1,055 | ) | | 58 |
| | (997 | ) |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 32,938 |
| | (9,184 | ) | | 23,754 |
| | 12,981 |
| | (8,238 | ) | | 4,743 |
| | 4,936 |
| | (2,117 | ) | | 2,819 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (1,697 | ) | | (329 | ) | | (2,026 | ) | | (5,846 | ) | | 5,840 |
| | (6 | ) | | (2,253 | ) | | (280 | ) | | (2,533 | ) |
| Net gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 |
| | All other segments | | Corporate | | Total |
| | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 1,919 |
| | (149 | ) | | 1,770 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 810,609 |
| | (17,370 | ) | | 793,239 |
|
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (1,412 | ) | | 99 |
| | (1,313 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (623,243 | ) | | 13,278 |
| | (609,965 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | (806 | ) | | (393 | ) | | (1,199 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 31,025 |
| | (14,830 | ) | | 16,195 |
|
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,704 |
| | (3,613 | ) | | (909 | ) |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | (299 | ) | | (443 | ) | | (742 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 221,095 |
| | (22,535 | ) | | 198,560 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (155 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (164 | ) | | (19,626 | ) | | 1,433 |
| | (18,193 | ) | | (56,426 | ) | | 346 |
| | (56,080 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (165 | ) | | 16 |
| | (149 | ) | | (178 | ) | | 33 |
| | (145 | ) | | (92,154 | ) | | 1,939 |
| | (90,215 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | 10,668 |
| | 2,728 |
| | 13,396 |
| | (167 | ) | | 36 |
| | (131 | ) | | 99,727 |
| | 4,505 |
| | 104,232 |
|
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 10,049 |
| | 2,292 |
| | 12,341 |
| | (19,971 | ) | | 1,502 |
| | (18,469 | ) | | 172,242 |
| | (15,745 | ) | | 156,497 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (171 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (177 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (153,169 | ) | | (1,085 | ) | | (154,254 | ) |
| Net gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | 10,680 |
| | 2,729 |
| | 13,409 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,680 |
| | 2,729 |
| | 13,409 |
|
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy, and Land Transformation segments have not been reconciliated due to the lack of differences.
Financial Statements
Non-IFRS Financial Measures
To supplement our Consolidated Financial Statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with IFRS, we use the following non-IFRS financial measures in this annual report, which are based on the information that arose from segment information (Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements, the statement of financial position and the statement of cash flow)Statements).
•Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA
•Adjusted Segment EBITDA
•Adjusted Consolidated EBIT
•Adjusted Segment EBIT
•Adjusted Free Cash Flow
•Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations
•Net Debt
•Net Debt to Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA
In this section, we provide an explanation and a reconciliation of each of our non-IFRS financial measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures. The presentation of these financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial information prepared and presented in accordance with IFRS.
We use non-IFRS measures to internally evaluate and analyze financial results. We believe these non-IFRS financial measures provide investors with useful supplemental information about the liquidity and financial performance of our business, enable comparison of financial results between periods where certain items may vary independent of business performance, and enable comparison of our financial results with other public companies, many of which present similar non-IFRS financial measures.
There are limitations associated with the use of non-IFRS financial measures as an analytical tool. In particular, many of the adjustments to our IFRS financial measures reflect the exclusion of items, such as depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets, changes in fair value and the related income tax effects of the aforementioned exclusions, that are recurring and will be reflected in our financial results for the foreseeable future. In addition, these measures may be different from non-IFRS financial measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes.
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA, Adjusted Segment EBITDA, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT
We present Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA, Adjusted Segment EBITDA, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT in this annual report as supplemental measures of performance of our company and of each operating segment, respectively, thatwhich are not required by, or presented in accordance with IFRS.
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA equals the sum of our Adjusted Segment EBITDA for each of our operating segments. We define “Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA” as (i) consolidated net profit (loss) for the year, as applicable, before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets, net gain from fair value adjustments of investment property land foreign exchange gains or losses, other net financial results; and (ii) adjusted by profit or loss from discontinued operations; (iii) adjusted by those items, that do not impact profit and loss, but are recorded directly in shareholders'shareholders’ equity, including (a) the gains or losses from disposals of non-controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, reflected under the line item: "Reserve from the sale of non-controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries” and (b) the net increase in value of sold farmland, which has been recognized in either revaluation surplus of retained earnings; and (iv) net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 from the Argentine operations included in profit from operations. (See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — A. Operating Results - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.")
We define “Adjusted Segment EBITDA” for each of our operating segments as (i) the segment’s share of consolidated profit (loss) from operations before financing and taxation per segment information for the year, as applicable, before depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets; and (ii) adjusted by profit or loss from discontinued operations; (iii) adjusted by those items, that do not impact profit and loss, but are recorded directly in shareholders'shareholders’ equity, including (a) the gains or losses from disposals of non-controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, reflected under the line item: "Reserve from the sale of non-controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries” and (b) the net increase in value of sold farmland, which has been recognized in either revaluation surplus of retained earnings.
We believe that Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are important measures of operating performance for our company and each operating segment, respectively, because they allow investors to evaluate and compare our consolidated operating results and to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments, respectively, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense from our outstanding debt), asset base (depreciation and amortization), tax consequences (income taxes), foreign exchange gains or losses and other financial results. In addition, by including the gains or losses from disposals of non-controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, investors can also evaluate and compare the full value and returns generated by our land transformation activities. Other companies may calculate Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA differently, and therefore our Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are not measures of financial performance under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated net profit (loss), cash flows from operating activities, segment’s profit from operations before financing and taxation and other measures determined in accordance with IFRS. Items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business, and, therefore, Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA should only be used as a supplemental measure of our company’s operating performance, and of each of our operating segments, respectively. We also believe Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are useful for securities analysts, investors and others to evaluate and compare the financial performance of our company and other companies in the agricultural industry. These non-IFRS measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, the information contained in either our statements of income or segment information.
Our Adjusted Consolidated EBIT equals the sum of our Adjusted Segment EBITs for each of our operating segments. We define “Adjusted Consolidated EBIT” as (i) consolidated net profit (loss) for the year, as applicable, before interest expense, income taxes, foreign exchange gains or losses and other net financial results; and (ii) adjusted by profit or loss from discontinued operations ; (iii) adjusted by gains or losses from disposals of non controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset farmland ; and (iv) net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 from the Argentine operations included in profit from operations. We define “Adjusted Segment EBIT” for each of our operating segments as the segment’s share of (i) consolidated profit (loss) from operations before financing and taxation as per segment information for the year, as applicable; and (ii) adjusted by profit or loss from discontinued operations; and (iii) adjusted by those items, that do not impact profit and loss, but are recorded directly in shareholders'shareholders’ equity, including (a) the gains or losses from disposals of non-controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, reflected under the line item: "Reserve from the sale of non-controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries”; (b) the net increase in value of sold farmland, which has been recognized in either revaluation surplus of retained earnings.
We believe that Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are important measures of operating performance, for our company and each operating segment, respectively, because they allow investors to evaluate and compare our consolidated operating results and to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments, from period to period by including the impact of depreciable fixed assets and removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense from our outstanding debt), tax consequences (income taxes), foreign exchange gains or losses and other financial results. In addition, by including the gains or losses from disposals of non-controllingnoncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland and also the sale of farmlands, investors can evaluate the full value and returns generated by our land transformation activities. Other companies may calculate Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT differently, and therefore our Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are not measures of financial performance under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated net profit (loss), cash flows from operating activities, segment’s profit from operations before financing and taxation and other measures determined in accordance with IFRS. Items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business, and, therefore, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT should only be used as a supplemental measure of the operating performance of our company, and of each of our operating segments, respectively.
Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations
We believe that the measures of Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations are important measures of liquidity that enable investors to draw important comparisons year to year of the amount of cash generated by the Company’s principal business and financing activities, which includes the cash generated from our land transformation activities, after paying for recurrent items, including interest, taxes and maintenance capital expenditures.
We define Adjusted Free Cash Flow as (i) net cash generated from operating activities net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 to the Argentine operations, less (ii) net cash used in investing activities net of the combined
effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21, less (iii) interest paid net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 to the Argentine operations, plus (iv) proceeds from the sale of non-controllingnoncontrolling interest in farming subsidiaries; less (v) lease payments.payments and less (vi) dividends paid to noncontrolling interest. We define Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations as (i) net cash generated from operating activities net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 less (ii) net cash used in investing activities net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21, , less (iii) interest paid net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 to the Argentine operations, plus (iv) proceeds from the sale of non-controllingnoncontrolling interest in subsidiaries; less (v) lease payments; less (vi) dividends paid to noncontrolling interest plus (vi)(vii) expansion capital expenditures. (See "Item 3. Key Information— A Selected Financial Data." and "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — A. Operating Results -- Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates"
Expansion capital expenditures is defined as the required investment to expand current production capacity including organic growth, joint ventures and acquisitions. We define maintenance capital expenditures as the necessary investments in order to maintain the current level of productivity both at an agricultural and industrial level. Proceeds from the sale of non-controllingnoncontrolling interest in farming subsidiaries is a measure of the cash generated from our land transformation business that is included under cash from financing activities pursuant to IFRS.
We believe Adjusted Free Cash Flow is an important liquidity measure for the Company because it allows investors and others to evaluate and compare the amount of cash generated by the Company business and financing activities to undertake growth investments, to fund acquisitions, to reduce outstanding financial debt, and to provide a return to shareholders in the form of dividends and/or share repurchases, among other things.
We believe Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations is an additional important liquidity metric for the Company because it allows investors and others to evaluate and compare the total amount of cash generated by the Company’s business and financing activities after paying for recurrent items including interests, taxes and maintenance capital expenses. We believe this metric is relevant in evaluating the overall performance of our business.
Other companies may calculate Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations differently, and therefore, our formulation may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations are not measures of liquidity under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated, cash flows from operating activities, net increase, (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and other measures determined in accordance with IFRS.
Net Debt and Net Debt to Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA
Net debt is defined as the sum of non-current and current borrowings less cash and cash equivalents. This measure is widely used by management.
Management is consistently tracking our leverage position and our ability to repay and service our debt obligations over time. We have therefore set a leverage ratio target that is measured by net debt divided by Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA.
We believe that the ratio net debt to Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA provides useful information to investors because management uses it to manage our debt-equity ratio in order to promote access to capital markets and our ability to meet scheduled debt service obligations.
Fiscal Year and Harvest Year
Our fiscal year begins on January 1 and ends on December 31 of each year. However, our production is based on the harvest year for each of our crops and rice. A harvest year varies according to the crop or rice and to the climate in which it is grown. Due to the geographic diversity of our farms, the planting period for a given crop or rice may start earlier on one farm than on another, causing differences in their respective harvesting periods. The presentation of production volume (tons) and product area (hectares) in this annual report, in respect of the harvest years for each of our crops and rice, starts with the first day of the planting period at the first farm to start planting on that harvest year and continues to the last day of the harvesting period of the respective crop or rice on the last farm to finish harvesting that harvest year, as shown in the table below.
Product area for cattle is presented on a harvest year basis given that land utilized for cattle operations is linked to our farming operations and use of farmland during a harvest year. Production volumes for dairy and cattle operations are presented on a fiscal year basis. On the other hand, production volumes and product area in our sugar, ethanol and energy business are presented on a fiscal year basis.
The financial results for all of our products are presented on a fiscal year basis.
Certain Weight Units and Measures in the Agricultural Business
Weight units and measures used in agriculture vary according to the crop and producing country. In order to permit comparability of our operating data with operating data from the international markets, the following table sets forth key weight units and measures used in the agriculture industry:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Agricultural weight units and measures | | |
| 1 metric ton | 1,000 kg | 1.102 U.S. (short) tons |
| 1 cubic meter | 1,000 liters | |
| 1 kilogram (kg) | 2.20462 pounds | |
| 1 pound | 0.45359 kg | |
| 1 acre | 0.40469 hectares | |
| 1 hectare (ha) | 2.47105 acres | |
| Soybean and Wheat | | |
| 1 bushel of soybean | 60 pounds | 27.2155 kg |
| 1 bag of soybean | 60 kg | 2.20462 bushels |
| 1 bushel/acre | 67.25 kg/ha | |
| 1.00 U.S. dollar/bushel | 2.2046 U.S. dollar/bag | |
| Corn | | |
| 1 bushel of corn | 56 pounds | 25.4012 kg |
| 1 bag of corn | 60 kg | 2.36210 bushels |
| 1 bushel/acre | 62.77 kg/ha | |
| 1.00 U.S. dollar/bushel | 2.3621 U.S. dollar/bag | |
| Dairy | | |
| 1 liter | 0.264 gallons | 2.273 pounds |
| 1 gallon | 3.785 liters | 8.604 pounds |
| 1 lbs | 0.440 liters | 0.116 gallons |
| 1.00 U.S. dollar/liter | 43.995 U.S. dollar/cwt | 3.785 U.S. dollar/gallon |
| 1.00 U.S. dollar/cwt | 0.023 U.S. dollar/liter | 0.086 U.S. dollar/gallon |
| 1.00 U.S. dollar/gallon | 0.264 U.S. dollar/liter | 11.622 U.S. dollar/cwt |
Sugar &and Ethanol | | |
| 1 kg of TRS equivalent | 0.95 kg of VHP Sugar | 0.59 liters of Hydrated Ethanol |
| 1.00 US$ cents/pound | 22.04 U.S. dollar/ton | |
Presentation of Information — Market Data and Forecasts
This annual report includes information provided by us and by third-party sources that we believe are reliable, including data related to the economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. Unless otherwise indicated, information in this annual report concerning economic conditions is based on publicly available information from third-party sources which we believe to be reasonable. The economic conditions in the markets in which we operate may deteriorate, and those economies may not grow at the rates projected by market data, or at all. The deterioration of the economic conditions in the markets in which we operate may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of our common shares.
Rounding
We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this annual report. Accordingly, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that preceded them.
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA [RESERVED]
The following selected statement of financial position data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and selected statement of income data and cash flow data for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 have been derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F. The selected statement of financial position data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 has been derived from our annual consolidated financial statements, which have been retroactively recast to give effect to the change of measurement basis for our investment properties during 2018. These financial statements are not included in this annual report.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS. All IFRS effective at the time of preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements have been applied.
You should read the information contained in the following tables in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, “Item 8. Financial Information”, “Item 18. Financial Statements” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this annual report.
Financial reporting in a hyperinflation economy
During 2018, Argentina experienced a significant increase in inflation, which exceeded the 100% three-year cumulative inflation rate. Also the remaining indicators do not contradict the conclusion that Argentina should be considered a hyperinflationary economy for accounting purposes. As a results, it is agreed that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Argentina is a hyperinflationary economy under the terms of IAS 29. Therefore, from July 1, 2018, we started applying IAS 29 in the financial reporting of its subsidiaries and associates with the Argentine peso as functional currency. (See "Presentation of Financial and Other Information - Financial reporting in a hyperinflation economy").
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| Statements of Income Data: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Sale of goods and services rendered | 887,138 |
| | 793,239 |
| | 933,178 |
| | 869,235 |
| | 674,314 |
|
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (671,173 | ) | | (609,965 | ) | | (766,727 | ) | | (678,581 | ) | | (557,786 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 68,589 |
| | 16,195 |
| | 63,220 |
| | 125,456 |
| | 54,528 |
|
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,825 |
| | (909 | ) | | 8,852 |
| | (5,841 | ) | | 14,691 |
|
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | 286,379 |
| | 198,560 |
| | 238,523 |
| | 310,269 |
| | 185,747 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (57,202 | ) | | (56,080 | ) | | (57,299 | ) | | (50,750 | ) | | (48,425 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (106,972 | ) | | (90,215 | ) | | (95,399 | ) | | (80,673 | ) | | (70,268 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | (822 | ) | | 104,232 |
| | 43,763 |
| | 5,752 |
| | 52,964 |
|
| Share of loss of joint ventures | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,685 | ) |
| Profit from operations before financing and taxation | 121,383 |
| | 156,497 |
| | 129,588 |
| | 184,598 |
| | 117,333 |
|
| Finance income | 9,908 |
| | 8,581 |
| | 11,744 |
| | 7,957 |
| | 9,150 |
|
| Finance costs | (202,566 | ) | | (271,263 | ) | | (131,349 | ) | | (165,380 | ) | | (116,890 | ) |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 92,437 |
| | 81,928 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Financial results, net | (100,221 | ) | | (180,754 | ) | | (119,605 | ) | | (157,423 | ) | | (107,740 | ) |
| Profit / (Loss) before income tax | 21,162 |
| | (24,257 | ) | | 9,983 |
| | 27,175 |
| | 9,593 |
|
| Income tax (expense) / benefit | (20,820 | ) | | 1,024 |
| | 4,992 |
| | (12,899 | ) | | 2,479 |
|
| Profit / (Loss) for the year | 342 |
| | (23,233 | ) | | 14,975 |
| | 14,276 |
| | 12,072 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Attributable to: | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Equity holders of the parent | (772 | ) | | (24,622 | ) | | 13,198 |
| | 11,568 |
| | 10,830 |
|
| Non-controlling interest | 1,114 |
| | 1,389 |
| | 1,777 |
| | 2,708 |
| | 1,242 |
|
| | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| (Loss) / earnings per share from operations attributable to the equity holders of the parent during the year: | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic (loss) / earnings per share | (0.007 | ) | | (0.211 | ) | | 0.109 |
| | 0.095 |
| | 0.090 |
|
| Diluted (loss) / earnings per share | (0.007 | ) | | (0.211 | ) | | 0.108 |
| | 0.094 |
| | 0.089 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Cash Flow Data: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net cash generated from operating activities (a) | 322,110 |
| | 218,513 |
| | 237,105 |
| | 255,401 |
| | 145,186 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities (b) | (248,710 | ) | | (174,922 | ) | | (188,335 | ) | | (122,014 | ) | | (125,051 | ) |
| Net cash generated from financing activities (c) | (37,863 | ) | | (20,854 | ) | | 70,194 |
| | (181,682 | ) | | 92,413 |
|
(a) Includes 23,550 and 7,598 of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(b) Includes 3,851 and 4,122 of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(c) Includes (14,340) and (8,231) of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
| Other Financial Data: | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) (1) | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Crops | 26,804 |
| | 34,635 |
| | 25,678 |
| | 27,462 |
| | 33,211 |
|
| Rice | 20,328 |
| | 18,827 |
| | 12,179 |
| | 11,698 |
| | 6,274 |
|
| Dairy | 14,965 |
| | 7,189 |
| | 12,243 |
| | 5,717 |
| | 6,356 |
|
| All Other segments | 266 |
| | (460 | ) | | 556 |
| | 9,085 |
| | 677 |
|
| Farming subtotal | 62,363 |
| | 60,191 |
| | 50,656 |
| | 53,962 |
| | 46,518 |
|
| Ethanol, sugar and energy | 253,069 |
| | 238,284 |
| | 247,301 |
| | 265,044 |
| | 167,180 |
|
| Land transformation | 9,376 |
| | 36,227 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,980 |
|
| Corporate | (19,639 | ) | | (19,971 | ) | | (21,664 | ) | | (20,957 | ) | | (21,776 | ) |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited) (1) | 305,169 |
| | 314,731 |
| | 276,293 |
| | 298,049 |
| | 215,902 |
|
| |
(1) | See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and the reconciliation in the table below. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| Statement of Financial Position Data: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Biological assets | 130,436 |
| | 105,387 |
| | 167,994 |
| | 145,404 |
| | 111,818 |
|
| Inventories | 112,790 |
| | 128,102 |
| | 108,919 |
| | 111,754 |
| | 85,286 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 1,493,220 |
| | 1,480,439 |
| | 831,377 |
| | 814,867 |
| | 696,889 |
|
| Right of use assets | 238,053 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total assets | 2,521,307 |
| | 2,277,372 |
| | 1,645,089 |
| | 1,496,397 |
| | 1,392,124 |
|
| Non-current lease liabilities | 174,570 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total lease liabilities | 216,384 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Non-current borrowings | 780,202 |
| | 718,484 |
| | 663,060 |
| | 430,304 |
| | 483,651 |
|
| Total borrowings | 968,280 |
| | 862,116 |
| | 817,958 |
| | 635,396 |
| | 723,339 |
|
| Share Capital | 183,573 |
| | 183,573 |
| | 183,573 |
| | 183,573 |
| | 183,573 |
|
| Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent | 988,269 |
| | 1,063,636 |
| | 673,880 |
| | 700,334 |
| | 556,814 |
|
| Non-controlling interest | 40,614 |
| | 44,509 |
| | 9,139 |
| | 11,970 |
| | 7,335 |
|
| Number of shares (including treasury shares) | 122,382 |
| | 122,382 |
| | 122,382 |
| | 122,382 |
| | 122,382 |
|
The following tables show a reconciliation of Adjusted Segment EBITDA to our segments’ profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation, the most directly comparable IFRS financial measure, and a reconciliation of Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA to our net profit (loss) for the year, the most directly comparable IFRS financial measure.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2019 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Farming Subtotal | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Trans- formation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Profit/(Loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation as per Segment Information | 22,142 |
| | 13,334 |
| | 9,901 |
| | (842 | ) | | 44,535 |
| | 95,412 |
| | 1,354 |
| | (19,659 | ) | | 121,642 |
|
| Net loss from Fair value adjustment of investment property as per Segment Information | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 927 |
| | 927 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 927 |
|
| Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,022 |
| | — |
| | 8,022 |
|
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(1) | 22,142 |
| | 13,334 |
| | 9,901 |
| | 85 |
| | 45,462 |
|
| 95,412 |
| | 9,376 |
| | (19,659 | ) | | 130,591 |
|
| Depreciation of Property, plant and equipment and amortization of Intangible Assets as per Segment Information | 4,662 |
| | 6,994 |
| | 5,064 |
| | 181 |
| | 16,901 |
| | 157,657 |
| | — |
| | 20 |
| | 174,578 |
|
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | 26,804 |
| | 20,328 |
| | 14,965 |
| | 266 |
| | 62,363 |
| | 253,069 |
| | 9,376 |
| | (19,639 | ) | | 305,169 |
|
| Reconciliation to Profit | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Profit for the year | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 342 |
|
| Income tax expense | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 20,820 |
|
| Interest expense, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 52,815 |
|
| Foreign exchange, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 108,458 |
|
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (92,437 | ) |
| Other financial results, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 31,385 |
|
| Combined effects of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries of Profit from operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 259 |
|
| Net loss from Fair value adjustment of investment property as per Segment Information | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 927 |
|
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited) (1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 122,569 |
|
| Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment and amortization of Intangible Assets as per Segment Information | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 174,578 |
|
| Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,022 |
|
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 305,169 |
|
| |
(1) | See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBIT, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT, Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2018 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Farming Subtotal | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Trans- formation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Profit/(Loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 32,938 |
| | 12,981 |
| | 4,936 |
| | 10,049 |
| | 60,904 |
| | 95,082 |
| | 36,227 |
| | (19,971 | ) | | 172,242 |
|
| Net gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10,680 | ) | | (10,680 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10,680 | ) |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(1) | 32,938 |
| | 12,981 |
| | 4,936 |
| | (631 | ) | | 50,224 |
| | 95,082 |
| | 36,227 |
| | (19,971 | ) | | 161,562 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 1,697 |
| | 5,846 |
| | 2,253 |
| | 171 |
| | 9,967 |
| | 143,202 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 153,169 |
|
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | 34,635 |
| | 18,827 |
| | 7,189 |
| | (460 | ) | | 60,191 |
| | 238,284 |
| | 36,227 |
| | (19,971 | ) | | 314,731 |
|
| Reconciliation to Profit | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Profit for the year | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | (23,233 | ) |
| Income tax expense | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | (1,024 | ) |
| Interest expense, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 43,662 |
|
| Foreign exchange, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 183,195 |
|
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (81,928 | ) |
| Other financial results, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 35,825 |
|
| Combined effects of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries of Profit from operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15,745 |
|
| Net gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (10,680 | ) |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 161,562 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 153,169 |
|
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 314,731 |
|
| |
(1) | See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBIT, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT, Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2017 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Farming Subtotal | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Trans- formation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Profit/(Loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 24,167 |
| | 8,328 |
| | 11,206 |
| | 4,699 |
| | 48,400 |
| | 102,852 |
| | — |
| | (21,664 | ) | | 129,588 |
|
| Net gain from fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4,302 | ) | | (4,302 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4,302 | ) |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(1) | 24,167 |
| | 8,328 |
| | 11,206 |
| | 397 |
| | 44,098 |
| | 102,852 |
| | — |
|
| (21,664 | ) | | 125,286 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 1,511 |
| | 3,851 |
| | 1,037 |
| | 159 |
| | 6,558 |
| | 144,449 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 151,007 |
|
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | 25,678 |
| | 12,179 |
| | 12,243 |
| | 556 |
| | 50,656 |
| | 247,301 |
| | — |
| | (21,664 | ) | | 276,293 |
|
| Reconciliation to Profit | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Profit for the year | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 14,975 |
|
| Income tax expense | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | (4,992 | ) |
| Interest expense, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 41,078 |
|
| Foreign exchange, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 38,708 |
|
| Other financial results, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 39,819 |
|
| Net gain from fair value adjustment of investment property | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | (4,302 | ) |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 125,286 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 151,007 |
|
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 276,293 |
|
| |
(1) | See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBIT, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT, Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2016 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segment | | Farming Subtotal | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Trans- formation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Profit/(Loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 26,093 |
| | 8,932 |
| | 4,753 |
| | 22,942 |
| | 62,720 |
| | 142,835 |
| | — |
| | (20,957 | ) | | 184,598 |
|
| Net gain from fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14,049 | ) | | (14,049 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14,049 | ) |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(1) | 26,093 |
| | 8,932 |
| | 4,753 |
| | 8,893 |
| | 48,671 |
| | 142,835 |
| | — |
|
| (20,957 | ) | | 170,549 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 1,369 |
| | 2,766 |
| | 964 |
| | 192 |
| | 5,291 |
| | 122,209 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 127,500 |
|
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | 27,462 |
| | 11,698 |
| | 5,717 |
| | 9,085 |
| | 53,962 |
| | 265,044 |
| | — |
| | (20,957 | ) | | 298,049 |
|
| Reconciliation to Profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Profit for the year | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 14,276 |
|
| Income tax expense | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 12,899 |
|
| Interest expense, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 40,527 |
|
| Foreign exchange, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 19,062 |
|
| Other financial results, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 97,834 |
|
| Net gain from fair value adjustment of investment property | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (14,049 | ) |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 170,549 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 127,500 |
|
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 298,049 |
|
| |
(1) | See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBIT, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT, Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2015 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Farming Subtotal | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Trans- formation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Profit/(Loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 30,784 |
| | 3,287 |
| | 4,900 |
| | 22,290 |
| | 61,270 |
| | 69,925 |
| | 7,914 |
| | (21,776 | ) | | 117,333 |
|
| Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries (2) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,066 |
| | — |
| | 16,066 |
|
| Net gain from fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (21,898 | ) | | (21,898 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (21,898 | ) |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(1) | 30,784 |
| | 3,287 |
| | 4,900 |
| | 392 |
| | 39,372 |
| | 69,925 |
| | 23,980 |
| | (21,776 | ) | | 111,501 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 2,427 |
| | 2,987 |
| | 1,456 |
| | 276 |
| | 7,146 |
| | 97,255 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 104,401 |
|
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | 33,211 |
| | 6,274 |
| | 6,356 |
| | 668 |
| | 46,518 |
| | 167,180 |
| | 23,980 |
| | (21,776 | ) | | 215,902 |
|
| Reconciliation to Profit | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Profit for the year | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 12,072 |
|
| Income tax expense | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | (2,479 | ) |
| Interest expense, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 49,491 |
|
| Foreign exchange losses, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 23,423 |
|
| Other financial results, net | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 34,826 |
|
| Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interest in subsidiaries) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,066 |
|
| Net gain from fair value adjustment of investment property | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (21,898 | ) |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 111,501 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 104,401 |
|
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 215,902 |
|
| |
(1) | See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBIT, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT, Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA. |
| |
(2) | This corresponds to an equity line item in our consolidated statements of financial position. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBIT, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT, Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net cash generated from operating activities | 322,110 |
| | 218,513 |
| | 237,105 |
| | 255,401 |
| | 145,186 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (248,710 | ) | | (174,922 | ) | | (188,335 | ) | | (122,014 | ) | | (125,051 | ) |
| Interest paid | (57,662 | ) | | (50,021 | ) | | (41,612 | ) | | (48,400 | ) | | (48,438 | ) |
| Lease payments | (49,081 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from the sale of non-controlling interest in subsidiaries | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,964 |
|
| Reversal of Expansion Capital expenditures (unaudited) | 129,074 |
| | 98,011 |
| | 70,804 |
| | 48,295 |
| | 87,956 |
|
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for operating Activities | (23,550 | ) | | (7,598 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for investing Activities | (3,851 | ) | | (4,122 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations (unaudited) | 68,330 |
| | 79,861 |
| | 77,962 |
| | 133,282 |
| | 81,617 |
|
| Expansion Capital expenditures (unaudited) | (129,074 | ) | | (98,011 | ) | | (70,804 | ) | | (48,295 | ) | | (87,956 | ) |
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow (unaudited) | (60,744 | ) | | (18,150 | ) | | 7,158 |
| | 84,987 |
| | (6,339 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Indebtedness | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net Debt (unaudited) | 678,004 |
| | 588,481 |
| | 548,763 |
| | 476,828 |
| | 524,445 |
|
| Net Debt / Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited) | 2.22x |
| | 1.87 | x | | 1.98 | x | | 1.60 | x | | 2.43 | x |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reconciliation - Net Debt | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Total Borrowings | 968,280 |
| | 862,116 |
| | 817,958 |
| | 635,396 |
| | 723,339 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | (290,276 | ) | | (273,635 | ) | | (269,195 | ) | | (158,568 | ) | | (198,894 | ) |
| Net Debt (unaudited) | 678,004 |
| | 588,481 |
| | 548,763 |
| | 476,828 |
| | 524,445 |
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted Free Cash Flow to Net increase/(decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 35,537 |
| | 22,737 |
| | 118,964 |
| | (48,295 | ) | | 112,548 |
|
| Proceeds from the sale of minority interest in subsidiaries | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,964 |
|
| Interest Paid | (57,662 | ) | | (50,021 | ) | | (41,612 | ) | | (48,400 | ) | | (48,438 | ) |
| Lease Payments | (49,081 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net cash generated from financing activities | 37,863 |
| | 20,854 |
| | (70,194 | ) | | 181,682 |
| | (92,413 | ) |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for operating activities | (23,550 | ) | | (7,598 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for investing activities | (3,851 | ) | | (4,122 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow (unaudited) | (60,744 | ) | | (18,150 | ) | | 7,158 |
| | 84,987 |
| | (6,339 | ) |
Reconciliation of Adjusted Free Cash Flow from operations to Net increase/(decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 35,537 |
| | 22,737 |
| | 118,964 |
| | (48,295 | ) | | 112,548 |
|
| Expansion Capital Expenditures (unaudited) | 129,074 |
| | 98,011 |
| | 71,891 |
| | 48,295 |
| | 87,956 |
|
| Proceeds from the sale of minority interest in subsidiaries | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,964 |
|
| Interest Paid | (57,662 | ) | | (50,021 | ) | | (41,612 | ) | | (48,400 | ) | | (48,438 | ) |
| Lease payments | (49,081 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net cash generated / (used) from financing activities | 37,863 |
| | 20,854 |
| | (70,194 | ) | | 181,682 |
| | (92,413 | ) |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for operating activities | (23,550 | ) | | (7,598 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for investing activities | (3,851 | ) | | (4,122 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow from operations (unaudited) | 68,330 |
| | 79,861 |
| | 79,049 |
| | 133,282 |
| | 81,617 |
|
B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS
Not Applicable.
C. REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not Applicable.
D. RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common shares involves a high degree of risk. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the information contained in this annual report, particularly the risks described below, as well as in our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Our business activities, cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of the risks and uncertainties below. The market price of our common shares may decrease due to any of these risks or other factors, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business operations.
For purposes of this section, the indication that a risk, uncertainty or problem may or will have a “material adverse effect on us” or that we may experience a “material adverse effect” means that the risk, uncertainty or problem could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and/or the market price of our common shares, except as otherwise indicated or as the context may otherwise require. Investors should view similar expressions in this section as having a similar meaning.
Summary of Risk Factors
The risks facing us and our business are many and varied. Set forth below is a summary of the risk factors more fully described herein.
The risks related to our business and industries include risks include the following:
•We may be exposed to risks related to health epidemics, and the COVID-19 in particular, that could adversely impact our ability to operate our business and results of operations.
•Unpredictable weather conditions, including as a result of climate change, pest infestations and diseases may have an adverse impact on agricultural production.
•Fluctuations in market prices for our products could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
•Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are also closely correlated to the price of petroleum, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline in the price of petroleum will adversely affect our sugar and ethanol businesses.
•The expansion of our business through acquisitions poses risks that may reduce the benefits we anticipate from these transactions.
•A significant increase in the price of raw materials we use in our operations, or the shortage of such raw materials, could adversely affect our results of operations.
•We cannot guarantee that our suppliers will not engage in improper practices, including inappropriate labor or manufacturing practices.
•Increased energy prices and frequent interruptions of energy supply could adversely affect our business.
•We depend on stable international trade and economic and other conditions in key export markets for our products.
•A worldwide economic downturn could weaken demand for our products or lower prices.
•Our business is seasonal, and our results may fluctuate significantly depending on the growing cycle of our crops.
•We face significant competition across our business segments, which could adversely affect our financial performance.
•Our current insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover our potential losses.
•Governmental policies reducing the amount of ethanol required to be added to gasoline, or eliminating tax incentives for flex-fuel vehicles, may adversely affect our business.
•Growth in the sale and distribution of ethanol depends in part on infrastructure improvements, which may not occur on a timely basis, if at all.
•A substantial portion of our assets is farmland that is highly illiquid.
•We have entered into agriculture partnership agreements in respect of a significant portion of our sugarcane plantations.
•Our performance depends on favorable working relationships with our employees and compliance with labor laws. Any strain on these relationships or increased labor costs could adversely affect our business.
•We may not possess all permits and licenses required to operate our business, or we may fail to renew or maintain the licenses and permits we currently hold, which could subject us to fines and other penalties.
•Our business is subject to significant governmental regulation, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
•Climate change may impose increased costs on our operations.
•Some of the agricultural commodities and food products that we produce contain genetically modified organisms.
•We may face restrictions and penalties under consumer protection laws.
•IFRS accounting standards related to biological assets require us to make numerous estimates in the preparation of our financial statements and therefore limit the comparability of our financial statements to similar issuers using U.S. GAAP.
•Our indebtedness could impair our financial condition and impair our ability to receive or pay out dividends.
•The terms of our indebtedness and that of certain of our subsidiaries impose significant restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility.
•Fluctuations in interest rates could have a significant impact on our results of operations, indebtedness and cash flow.
•We may need additional capital and we may not be able to obtain it.
•There is a risk that we could be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could materially increase our U.S. federal income tax liability and subject any dividends we pay to U.S. federal withholding tax.
•We may be classified by the IRS as a “passive foreign investment company,” which may result in adverse tax consequences for U.S. investors.
•We are subject to anticorruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and other international trade laws and regulations.
•We may be adversely affected by the ongoing armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
•Technological advances or alternative products may affect demand for our products and services or require substantial capital investments to remain competitive.
•Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our technology infrastructure and information and expose us to processes disruption and liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
•We depend on our information technology systems and any failure of these systems could adversely affect our business.
•Noncompliance with data protection laws could adversely affect our business.
•Our operations are subject to disruptions by third parties who interfere with the possession of our real estate or our means of production.
We also confront risks associated with the countries in which we operate, primarily in Argentina and Brazil, which include the following:
•Our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon economic conditions in the emerging countries in which we operate.
•Economic and political conditions in the countries in which we operate, and the perception of these conditions in international markets, may adversely impact our business, our access to the capital and debt markets, our results of operations and financial condition.
•The economies of the countries in which we operate may be adversely affected by the deterioration of other global markets.
•Governments have a high degree of influence in the economies in which we operate, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
•Currency exchange rate fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar in the countries in which we operate our businesses may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
•Inflation in some of the countries in which we operate, along with governmental measures to curb inflation, may have a significant negative effect on the economies of those countries and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations.
•Disruption of transportation and logistics services, insufficient investment in public infrastructure or disruption to any aspect of the supply chain could adversely affect our operating results.
•The Argentine economy may be affected by its government’s limited access to financing from international markets and the result of failure to pay its debt obligations.
•Argentina’s current account and balance of payment imbalances could lead to a depreciation of the Argentine peso, and as a result, affect our results of operations, our capital expenditure program and our ability to service our foreign currency liabilities.
•Failure to adequately address actual and perceived risks of institutional corruption may adversely affect the economy and financial condition of the emerging markets in which we operate.
•Laws on the foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties.
•An increase in export and import duties and controls may have an adverse impact on our sales.
•Exchange controls restrict the inflow and outflow of funds and may substantially limit the ability of companies to retain or obtain foreign currency or make payments abroad.
•Changes in tax laws may have a material adverse impact on the taxes applicable to our business and may increase our tax burden.
•We receive certain tax benefits from Brazilian tax authorities, which we cannot assure will be maintained or renewed.
•Government laws and regulations in Brazil governing the burning of sugarcane could have a material adverse impact on our business or financial performance.
As a Luxembourg corporation (“société anonyme”) we and our common shares are also exposed to risks that include the following:
•The price of our common shares may be highly volatile.
•Our exemption as a “foreign private issuer” from certain rules under the U.S. securities laws will result in less information about us being available to investors than for U.S. companies, which may result in our common shares being less attractive to investors.
•We are a Luxembourg corporation (“société anonyme”) and it may be difficult for you to obtain or enforce judgments against us or our executive officers and directors in the United States.
•Our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a U.S. corporation, which could adversely impact trading in our common shares and our ability to conduct equity financings.
•Luxembourg and European Union insolvency and bankruptcy laws and regulations are substantially different from U.S. insolvency laws and may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
•Our ability to pay dividends is restricted under Luxembourg law.
•We are a holding company and depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments, which they may not be able to do.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industries
We may be exposed to risks related to health epidemics, and the COVID-19 in particular, that could adversely impact our ability to operate our business and results of operations.
In December 2019, a novel strain
The global impact of coronavirus known asthe COVID-19 (“COVID-19”) surfaced in Wuhan, China,pandemic and was declared a worldwide pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. The speed and extent ofmeasures taken to reduce the spread of the virus have had an adverse effect on the global macroeconomic environment and may continue to create economic uncertainty and reduce economic activity. The outbreak has resulted in authorities implementing numerous measures to try to contain the virus, such as travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter-in-place or total lock-down orders and business limitations and shutdowns.
As of the date of this report, many restrictions have been lifted or relaxed as a result of the implementation of vaccination programs. However, while it has eased, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact worldwide economic activity and to pose the durationrisk that we or our employees, contractors, suppliers, customers and intensityother business partners may be prevented from conducting certain business activities for an indefinite period of resultingtime, including future shutdowns that may be mandated or reinstated by governmental authorities or otherwise implemented by companies as a preventive measure. The ability of our business disruptionpartners and related financialsuppliers to comply with contractual obligations may be impaired and social impact, are uncertain,lead to the interruption of the supply of raw materials. Consequently, the productivity of our facilities could be adversely impacted, affecting our operations, the quality and suchcontinuity of our activities and our reputation.
We believe that a worsening of the COVID-19 pandemic, including any possible future outbreaks of new COVID-19 variants, or the spread of new viruses may have an adverse effectseffect on our businesssuppliers and financial positiontransportation companies used to distribute our products. Any quarantines or spread of viruses may be material.
The Company could be negatively affected if personnel including management and personnel at its farming and industrial operations are quarantined asadversely affect the resultdemand of or in order to avoid, exposure to the virus. While governmental agencies and private sector participants are seeking to mitigate the adverse effects of this coronavirus, including measures such as heightened sanitary practices, telecommuting, quarantine, curtailment or cessation of travel, and other restrictions, and the medical community is developing vaccines and other treatment options, the timing and efficacy of such measures is uncertain. These and other responses could impact the ability to harvest, produce and market our products the availability of those who make the decision to purchase our products and the ultimate demand for our products.from end-consumers.
Commodity markets arehave been and may also likely to be disrupted with attendant effects on demand for some of our products. For example, the reduced circulation of people due to the imposition of lockdown measures, may result in a decrease in international oil prices and ethanol, having an impact on our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business and slowing down our ethanol production. In addition, the Chinese market is a significant source of global demand for the commodities we sell, including soy and corn, and a reduction in demand from China may have a significant effect on commodity prices and demand and potentially broader impacts on our supply chain or the global economy. In addition, the COVID 19 pandemic and other factors have also adversely impacted demand and supply in the oil market suppressing oil prices, which are correlated with the price of ethanol, and negatively impacted our ethanol operations. See "Risks Related to Our Business and Industries — Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are also closely correlated to the price of oil, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline in the price of oil will adversely affect our sugar and ethanol businesses and- Fluctuations in market prices for our products could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations".
Further, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and any possible futureFuture outbreaks of virusesCOVID-19, may also have a significant adverse effect on us. Firstly, a spread of such diseases amongst our employees, as well as any quarantines affecting them or our facilities could adversely impact the productivity of our personnel and thereby affect our operations, which can impact the quality and continuity of our activities and our reputation. Secondly, the current COVID-19 pandemic and any possible future outbreaks of viruses may have an adverse effect on our suppliers and/or transportation companies used to distribute our products. Thirdly, any quarantines or spread of viruses may adversely affect the demand of our products from end-consumers.
Additionally, our operations may be adversely affected by the wider macroeconomic effect of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, it is expected there be a recession or diminishing growth in several countries, including Argentina and Brazil, due to the freeze of the economic activities. The final effects of the COVID-19 pandemic could have substantial negative impact on the countries where we operate. Any negative effect on the economy particularly in theof these countries, that we operate, may decrease incomes and the demand for our products. Lastly, in case of an economic downturn, the price of our common shares may be adversely affected.
We are not now ableunable to fully determine fully the extent to which COVID-19 will impact our business activity or financial results, which will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted fully (see “—Risks Related to Argentina-Theentirely, including potential government measures, taken or to besuch as those implemented byin the Argentine government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause adverse effect on our business and operations” and "— Risks Related to Brazil — The measures taken or to be implemented by the Brazilian government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause adverse effect on our business and operations-").past.
Unpredictable weather conditions, including as a result of climate change, pest infestations and diseases may have an adverse impact on agricultural production.
The occurrence of severe adverseSevere weather or environmental conditions, especiallyin particular, droughts, hail, floods, or frost or diseasespestilence, are unpredictable and may have a potentially devastatingsignificant adverse impact on agricultural production and may otherwise adversely affect the supply and price of the agricultural commodities that we sell and use in our business. AdverseMoreover, adverse weather conditions may be exacerbated by the effects of climate change which impacts the entirety of our business and policies.
The effects of severe adverse weather conditions See “—Climate change may reduce yields ofimpose increased costs on our agricultural activities.operations.” Additionally, higher than average temperatures and rainfall can contribute to an increased presence of pest and insects thatpestilence, which may adversely impact our agricultural production. Furthermore,
Our sugar production depends on the potential physical impactsvolume and sucrose content of climate change are uncertainthe sugarcane that we cultivate or that is supplied to us by growers located in the vicinity of our mills. Both sugarcane yields and sucrose content depend primarily on weather conditions such as rainfall and temperature, which can vary. Weather conditions have historically caused volatility in the ethanol and sugar industries. Future weather patterns may vary by region, which includes changesreduce the amount of sugarcane that we can harvest or purchase, or the sucrose content in rainfall patterns, water shortages, changing sea levelssuch sugarcane, and, changing temperature levels thatconsequently, the amount of sugar and ethanol we can produce in any given harvest. Any reduction in production volumes could adversely impacthave a material adverse effect on our businessresults of operations and financial condition.
The effects of severe adverse weather conditions may further reduce yields of our agricultural activities. In June and July 2021, a cold front hit most of Brazil's key productive areas. Low temperatures caused severe frost damage on sugarcane plantations in various regions, including in the location, costs and competitivenessstates of global agricultural production and related storage and processing facilities. During April and November 2019 we suffered from a drought inSão Paulo, Paraná, Mato Grosso do Sul and Minas Gerais. This adversely impacted our yields, which led to a significant decrease in sugarcane yields forhad already been affected by drought during the year in the center-south region of Brazil. Sugarcane yields in 2021 were 13.3% lower compared to 2020, at 68.9 tons per hectare, while total recoverable sugar content or "TRS" decreased 2.8%. This fall in agricultural productivity due to adverse weather conditions led us to recognize a loss of idle production of approximately US$15.0 million in 2021. As a result, we cannot assure you that future severe adverse weather conditions, including as a result of climate change or pestilence, will not adversely affect our operating results and reduced profit from operations by about $49.5 million . Yields may also be affected by plagues, diseases or weed infections and related operational problems. See “Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations — (i) Effects of Yield Fluctuations”.financial condition.
Similarly, the occurrence and effects of disease and plaguespestilence can be unpredictable and devastating to agricultural products, potentially rendering all or a substantial portion of the affected harvest unsuitable for sale. Our agricultural products are also susceptible to fungusfungi and bacteria that are associated with excessively moist conditions. Our results of operations could be adversely affected in such cases where our production is materially affected and all or a substantial portion of the production costs have been incurred. We cannot assure you that such events in the future will not adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, if we fail to control a given plaguepestilence or disease and our production is threatened, we may be unable to supply our main customers, which could affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our sugar production dependsIn addition, disease among our dairy cattle herd, such as mastitis, tuberculosis, brucellosis and foot-and-mouth disease, can have an adverse effect on the volume and sucrose contentproductivity. Outbreaks of the sugarcane that we cultivate or that is supplied to us by growers locatedcattle diseases may also result in the vicinityclosure of certain important markets to our mills. Both sugarcane yieldscattle-derived products. We cannot assure that future outbreaks will not occur. A future outbreak of diseases among our cattle herds could adversely affect our milk sales and sucrose content depend primarily on weather conditions such as rainfalloperating results and temperature, which vary. Weather conditions have historically caused volatilityfinancial condition. Furthermore, outbreaks, or fears of outbreaks, of any of these or other animal diseases may lead to the cancellation of orders by our customers, in particular if the ethanol and sugar industries. Future weather patternsdisease has the potential to affect human health or create adverse publicity that may reduce the amount of sugarcane that we can harvest or purchase, or the sucrose content in such sugarcane, and, consequently, the amount of sugar and ethanol we can produce in any given harvest. Any reduction in production volumes could have a material adverse effect on consumer demand for our operating results and financial condition.products. Moreover, outbreaks of animal disease may lead foreign governments to ban the import of some or all of our products, which may result in the destruction of some or all of these animals.
As a result, we cannot assure you that future severe adverse weather conditions, including as a result of climate change, or pest infestations will not adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Fluctuations in market prices for our products could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Prices for agricultural products and by-products, including, among other things, sugar, ethanol, and grains, like those of other commodities, have historically been cyclical and sensitive to domestic and international changes in supply and demand and can be expected to fluctuate significantly. In addition, the agricultural products and by-products we produce are traded on commodities and futures exchanges and thus are subject to speculative trading, which may adversely affect us. The prices that we are able to obtain for our agricultural products and by-products depend on many factors beyond our control including:
•prevailing world commodity prices, which historically have been subject to significant fluctuations over relatively short periods of time, depending on worldwide demand and supply;
•changes in the agricultural subsidy levels of certain important producers (mainly the U.S. and the European Union, (“E.U.or the “E.U.,”) and the adoption of other government policies affecting industry market conditions and prices;
•changes to trade barriers of certain important consumer markets (including China, India, the U.S. and the E.U.) and the adoption of other governmental policies affecting industry market conditions and prices;
•changes in government policies for biofuels;
•disruptions in commodity markets caused by global events, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;pandemic and the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine;
•world inventory levels, i.e., the supply of commodities carried over from year to year;
•climatic conditions and natural disasters in areas where agricultural products are cultivated;
•the production capacity of our competitors; and
•demand for and supply of competing commodities and substitutes.
Further, because we may not hedge 100% of the price risk of our agricultural products, we may beare unable to have minimum price guarantees for all of our production and are, therefore, exposed to risks associated with the prices of agricultural products and their volatility. WeAs a result, we are subject to fluctuations in prices of agricultural products that could result in our receiving lower prices for our agricultural products than our production costs.
The rapid and widening spread ofIn addition, the COVID-19 is impactingpandemic has impacted the price of the products we sell (i.e sugar,(i.e., ethanol, corn, powder milk among others) due to the lower demand and economic activity worldwide. As an example, during the month ofin March 2020,2021, sugar prices in U.S. dollars decreased by 26%8.8%, according to ICE-NY,the Intercontinental Exchange – New York, or “ICE-NY,” anhydrous and hydrous ethanol prices in Brazilian reais decreased 10%25% and 26%, respectively, according to ESALQthe Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture of the University of São Paulo (Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz), or “ESALQ,” and corn prices in U.S. dollars decreased by 9.1% based on CBOT.4.6%, according to the Chicago Board of Trade, or the “CBOT”. Given the uncertainty around the extent and timing of the COVID-19 pandemic we cannot predict or assesassess the final impact of the pandemic. (See "— The COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect our business and operating results").
In addition,Moreover, there is a strong relationship between the value of our land holdings and market prices of the commodities we produce, which are affected by global economic conditions. A decline in the prices of grains, sugar, ethanol, or related by-productsby-
products below their current levels for a sustained period of time could significantly reduce the value of our land holdings and materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are also closely correlated to the price of oil,petroleum, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline in the price of oilpetroleum will adversely affect our sugar and ethanol businesses.
A vast majority of ethanol in Brazil is produced at sugarcane mills that produce both ethanol and sugar. Because sugarcane millers are able to alter their product mix in response to the relative prices of ethanol and sugar, the prices of both products are directly correlated, and the correlation between ethanol and sugar may increase over time. Sugar prices in Brazil are determined by prices in the world market, resulting in a correlation between Brazilian ethanol prices and world sugar prices. Accordingly, a decline in sugar prices would have an adverse effect on the financial performance of our ethanol and sugar businesses.
In addition, gasoline prices in Brazil are set by the Brazilian government through Petrobras. BecauseMoreover, because flex-fuel vehicles which have become popular in Brazil, allow consumers to choose between gasoline and ethanol at the pump rather than inat the showroom, ethanol prices are correlated to gasoline prices as well and, consequently, international oil prices.
OilIn Brazil, petroleum and petroleum derivatives have historically been subject to price controls. Currently there is no legislation or regulation in force giving the Brazilian government the power to set prices collapsedfor petroleum, petroleum products, ethanol or vehicular natural gas. However, given that Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras, the only supplier of oil-based fuels in the past weeks withBrazil, is a record demand shock along with excess supply created bygovernment-controlled company, prices of petroleum and petroleum products are subject to government influence, resulting in potential inconsistencies between international prices and internal dispute among OPEC members. On March 9, 2020, a dispute between the Saudisoil derivative prices that affect our business and the Russians sparked an all-out price and market share war (the kingdom slashed the price of Arab Light crude and increased production to full capacity to almost 12.3 million barrels per day starting in April). In addition, the COVID-19 outbreak is generating unprecedented loss in demand for oil as billions of people across the globe are in quarantine, with the virus paralyzing air and ground travel and and the collapse of fuel demand. This perfect storm caused oil prices to collapse as the supply glut gradually expanded and demand contracted. On April 12, 2020, the OPEC+ and G20 agreed on a round of production cuts for a total of approximately 9.7-million barrels per day from May 1, 2020 until June 30, 2020. Nonetheless, we believe that significant risks remain on the demand for oil, as the COVID-19 pandemic demand impacts could last longer than expected. During the month of March 2020, sugar prices decreased by 26% according to ICE-NY and ethanol prices decreased 10% according to ESALQ
While weour financial results, which are not now ablelinked to fully determine the impact of the decline in oil prices to our operations, weinternational prices.
We believe that the decline in oil prices or a decision by Petrobras to lower fuel prices and its attendant effects on the price ofcorrelation between petroleum, ethanol and sugar prices will increase over time. Accordingly, a decline in sugar prices will have an adverse effect on the financial performance of our ethanol and sugar business.businesses, and a decline in petroleum prices could make ethanol less competitive and reduce demand, despite increased sales of flex-fuel vehicles, affecting our results and financial condition, including cash flows. Finally, a decrease in gasoline prices could make ethanol less competitive and result in a reduction in demand even if demand for flex-fuel vehicles were to increase, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The expansion of our business through acquisitions poses risks that may reduce the benefits we anticipate from these transactions.
As part of our business strategy, we have grown through acquisitions. We plan to continue growing by acquiring other farms and production facilities throughout South America. We believe that the agricultural industry and agricultural activity in the region are highly fragmented and that our future consolidation opportunities will continue to be significant to our growth. However, our management is unable to predict whether or when any prospective acquisitions or strategic alliances will occur, or if such acquisitions or strategic alliances will be agreed upon on favorable terms and conditions. Our ability to continue to expand our business successfully through acquisitions and strategic alliances depends on many factors, including our ability to identify potential acquisitions, access financing sources, including through capital markets, at acceptable conditions, negotiate favorable transaction terms and successfully consummate and integrate any businesses we acquire.
To support the acquisitions we pursue, we may need to implement new or upgraded strategies, systems, procedures and controls for our operations and will face risks, including diversion of management time and focus and challenges associated with integrating new managers and employees. We may be unable to realize synergies and efficiency gains from acquisitions or to identify, negotiate or finance future acquisitions, particularly as part of our international growth strategy, successfully or at favorable valuations, or to effectively integrate these acquisitions or strategic alliances with our current businesses. Our failure to integrate new businesses or manage any new alliances successfully could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
Any future strategic alliances or acquisitions of businesses, technologies, services or products might require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all, and may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, as well as strain on our organizational culture, especially if an acquisition is followed by a period of lower than projected prices for our products. Future acquisitions and joint ventures may be subject to antitrust and other regulatory approvals, which may not be obtained on a timely basis or at all.
Acquisitions also expose us to the risk of successor liability relating to actions involving an acquired company, its management or contingent liabilities incurred before the acquisition. The due diligence we conduct in connection with an acquisition, and any contractual guarantees or indemnities that we receive from the sellers of acquired companies, may not be
sufficient to protect us from, or compensate us for, actual liabilities. Any material liability associated with an acquisition could adversely affect our reputation and results of operations and reduce the benefits of the acquisition.
In addition,Finally, we are unable to predict the effect that changes in Argentine or Brazilian legislation regarding foreign ownership of rural properties could have in our business. See “ — “—Risks Related to Argentina-Argentine law concerningthe Countries in Which We Operate—Laws on the foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “—Risks Related to Brazil—Changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.properties.”
A significant increase in the price of raw materials we use in our operations, or the shortage of such raw materials, could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our production process requires various raw materials, including primarilyin particular fertilizer, pesticides and seeds, which we acquire from local and international suppliers. We do not have long-term supply contracts for most of these raw materials. A significant increase in the cost of these raw materials, especially fertilizer and agrochemicals, a shortage of raw materials or the unavailability of these raw materials entirely could reduce our profit margin, reduce our production and/or interrupt the production of some of our products, in all cases adversely affecting the results of our operations and our financial condition.
For example, we rely on fertilizers and agrochemicals, many of which are petro-chemicalpetrochemical based. In our Farming business, fertilizers and agrochemicals represented approximately 19%17.1% of our total cost of production (including manufacturing and administrative expenses) for the 2018/20192021/2022 harvest year. In our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business, fertilizers and agrochemicals represented 12%17.1% of our cost of production (including manufacturing and administrative expenses) for 2018the 2020/2021 harvest and 12%20.9% for 2019.the 2021/2022 harvest. Worldwide production of agricultural products has increased significantly in recent years increasing thein response to increased demand for agrochemicals and fertilizers. However, shortages in its supply remain, which has been aggravated by the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. See “—We may be adversely affected by the ongoing armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine”.
We cannot guarantee that our suppliers will not engage in improper practices, including inappropriate labor or manufacturing practices.
We cannot guarantee that our suppliers’ business operations comply with all applicable laws and regulations relating to working conditions, sustainability, production chain assurance and appropriate safety conditions, or that they will not carry out improper practices relating to such matters to reduce the cost of the products they sell to us. In the event that our suppliers engage in such improper business practices, our customers’ perception of our business may be adversely affected, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and our reputation.
Moreover, considering Brazilian law and judicial precedent, we may be involved in litigation concerning our suppliers’ inappropriate labor practices, as labor authorities may argue that we failed to adequately supervise our supply chain. This has resulted, among other things,risk is particularly relevant if these suppliers are involved in increased prices for agrochemicalssensitive labor issues, such as child labor and fertilizers.direct or indirect use of forced labor or modern slavery. Any such litigation could impact our customers’ perception of our business, and adverse decisions may compel us to disburse material amounts in connection therewith, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and our reputation
Increased energy prices and frequent interruptions of energy supply could adversely affect our business.
We require substantial amounts of fuel oil and other resources for our harvest activities and transport of our agricultural products. During both the 2018/192019/20 and 2020/2021 harvest year,years, fuel represented 5%3.2% of the cost of production (including manufacturing and administrative expenses) of our Farming business. In our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business, fuel represented 13%10.5%, 9.3%; and 10.2% of our cost of production (including manufacturing and administrative expenses) for the 2019/20in harvest year. years 2021, 2020 and2019, respectively.
We rely upon third parties for
our supply of energy resources used in our operations.operations. The prices for and availability of energy resources may be subject to change or curtailment, respectively, due to, among other things, new laws or regulations, imposition of new taxes or tariffs, interruptions in production by suppliers, imposition of restrictions on energy supply by government, worldwide price levels and market conditions. OverIn addition, our contracts for the purchase and sale of energy in the free market may contain flexibilities according to which counterparties may also reduce the amounts of contracted energy, within certain limits. Any of these events could affect our revenues if we are unable to sell the reduced volumes at the same price or due to the excess energy that we fail to sell. In addition, in the event of an energy shortage, the government may impose rationing obligations that could affect the volumes established in our contracts, consequently affecting our revenues.
Moreover, over the last few years, the Argentine government has taken certain measures in order to reduce the use of energy during peak months of the year by frequently cutting energy supply to industrial facilities and large consumers to ensure adequate supply for residential buildings. For example, certain of our industrial facilities have been subject to a quota system whereby electricity cuts occur on a work shift basis, resulting in our facilities being shut down during certain work shifts. Brazil has also been subject to electricity rationing measures as a result of droughts in recent years. We cannot assure you that we will be able to procure the required energy inputs at acceptable prices. If energy supply is cut for an extended period of time and we are unable to find replacement sources at comparable prices, or at all, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We depend on stable international trade and economic and other conditions in key export markets for our products.
Our operating results depend largely on economic conditions and regulatory policies for our products in major export markets. The ability of our products to compete effectively in these export markets may be adversely affected by a number of factors that are beyond our control, including the deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, volatility of exchange rates, the imposition of greater tariffs or protectionist policies or other trade barriers or other factors in those markets, such as regulations relating to chemical content of products and safety requirements. The European Union,EU, for example, limits the import of genetically modified organisms, or “GMOs.” See “—Some of the agricultural commodities and food products that we produce contain genetically modified organisms.”
Due to the growing participation in the worldwide agricultural commodities markets by commodities produced in South America, South American growers,producers, including us, are increasingly affected by the measures taken by importing countries in order to protect their local producers. Measures such as the limitation on imports adopted in a particular country or region may affect the sector’s export volume significantly and, consequently, our operating results. Additionally, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, governments and other authorities have established certain restrictions on the freedom of movement and business operations, including travel bans, supply chain disruptions and border closures. Other measures such as the restriction on imports or business closures of ports, airports or any locations of entry, or border closings may have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial results. See “— The COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect our business and operating results.”.
If the sale of our products into a particular importing country is adversely affected by trade barriers or by any of the factors mentioned above, the relocation of our products to other consumers on terms equally favorable could be impaired, and our business, financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.
A worldwide economic downturn could weaken demand for our products or lower prices.
The demand for the products we sell may be affected by international, national and local economic conditions that are beyond our control. Adverse changes in the perceived or actual economic climate, such as higher fuel prices, higher interest rates, stock and real estate market declines and/or volatility, more restrictive credit markets, higher taxes, and changes in governmental policies could reduce the level of demand or prices of the products we produce. We cannot predict the duration or magnitude of a downturn or the timing or strength of economic recovery. If a downturn were to continue for an extended period of time or worsen, we could experience a prolonged period of decreased demand and prices. In addition, economic downturns have and may adversely impact our suppliers, which can result in disruptions in goods and services and financial losses. Finally, the deterioration of global economic conditions, particularly in relevant economies such as the United States and China, as a result of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic or other events may ultimately decrease the customer demand for our products and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See “— The COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect our business and operating results.”
Our business is seasonal, and our results may fluctuate significantly depending on the growing cycle of our crops.
As with any agricultural business enterprise, our business operations are predominantly seasonal in nature. The harvest of corn, soybean and rice generally occurs from January to May. Wheat is harvested from December to January. Cotton is harvested from June to August, but requires processing which takes approximately two to three months. Our operations and sales are affected by the growing cycle of our crops process and the timing of our harvest sales.
In addition, our sugarSugar, Ethanol and ethanolEnergy business is subject to seasonal trends based on the sugarcane growing cycle in the center-south region of Brazil. The annual sugarcane harvesting period in the center-south region of Brazil begins in March/April and ends in November/December. This creates price fluctuations which result in fluctuations in our sugar and ethanol inventories, usually peaking in December to take advantage of higher prices during the traditional off-season (i.e., January through April), and a degree of seasonality in our gross profit. Seasonality could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial performance. In addition, our quarterly results may vary as a result
of the effects of fluctuations in commodities
prices, production yields and costs. Therefore, our results of operations have varied significantly from period to period and are likely to continue to vary, due to seasonal factors.
Our dairy cattle are vulnerable to diseases.
Diseases among our dairy cattle herd, such as mastitis, tuberculosis, brucellosis and foot-and-mouth disease, can have an adverse effect on productivity. Outbreaks of cattle diseases may also result in the closure of certain important markets to our cattle-derived products. We cannot assure that future outbreaks will not occur. A future outbreak of diseases among our cattle herds could adversely affect our milk sales and operating results and financial condition.
Furthermore, outbreaks, or fears of outbreaks, of any of these or other animal diseases may lead to cancellation of orders by our customers and, particularly if the disease has the potential to affect humans, or create adverse publicity that may have a material adverse effect on consumer demand for our products. Moreover, outbreaks of animal disease may result in foreign governmental action to close export markets to some or all of our products, which may result in the destruction of some or all of these animals.
We face significant competition from Brazilian and foreign producers,across our business segments, which could adversely affect our financial performance.
WeIn our Farming business, we face strongsignificant competition from other producers in ourthe domestic marketmarkets and from foreign producers in our export markets. The market for commodities is highly fragmented. Small producers can also be important competitors, some of which operate in the informal economy and are able to offer lower prices by meeting lower quality standards. Competition from other producers is a barrier to expanding our sales in the domestic/domestic and foreign market.markets. With respect to exports, we compete with other large, vertically integrated producers that have the ability to produce quality products at low cost, as well as with foreign producers.
The Brazilian markets, in particular, are highly price-competitive and sensitive to product substitution. Customers may seek to diversify their sources of supply by purchasing a portion of the products they need from producers in other countries, as some of our customers in key export markets have begun to do. We expect that we will continue to face strong competition in all of our markets and anticipate that existing or new competitors may broaden their product lines and extend their geographic scope. Any failure by us to respond to product, pricing and other moves by competitors may negatively affect our financial performance.
Our current insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover our potential losses.
Our production is, in general, subject to different risks and hazards, including adverse weather conditions, fires, diseases and pest infestations, other natural phenomena, industrial accidents, labor disputes, changes in the legal and regulatory framework applicable to us, environmental contingencies and other natural phenomena. Our insurance currently covers only part of the losses we may incur and does not cover losses on crops due to hail storms, fires or similar risks. Furthermore, certain types of risks may not be covered by the policies we have for our industrial facilities. Additionally, we cannot guarantee that the indemnification paid by the insurer due to the occurrence of a casualty covered by our policies will be sufficient to entirely compensate us for the loss or damages suffered. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount desired at reasonable costs. If we were to incur significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may incur additional expenses to mitigate the loss, such as shifting production to another facility. These costs may not be fully covered by our insurance.
A reduction in market demand for ethanol or a change in governmental policies reducing the amount of ethanol required to be added to gasoline may adversely affect our business.
Government authorities of several countries, including Brazil and certain states of the United States, currently require the use of ethanol as an additive to gasoline.
Approximately 31% of all fuel ethanol in Brazil is consumed in the form of anhydrous ethanol blended with gasoline; the remaining 69% of fuel ethanol is consumed in the form of hydrous ethanol, which is mostly used to power flex-fuel vehicles. Flex-fuel vehicles have the flexibility to run either on gasoline (blended with anhydrous ethanol) or hydrous ethanol. In the United States, almost all gasoline sold contains 10% ethanol. The European Union aims for 10% of the energy used in the transport sector to derive from renewable energy sources by 2020, without specific targets for certain renewable energy sources and without intermediate targets, to be determined by each Member State. Other countries such as Colombia and Canada have a 8% and 5% biofuel blending mandate, respectively, while Argentina currently has a 12% ethanol blending. In addition, flex-fuel and ethanol powered vehicles in Brazil are entitled to a tax benefit in the form of a lower tax rate on manufactured products (Imposto sobre
Produtos Industrializados) and therefore are currently taxed at lower levels than gasoline-only vehicles, which has contributed to the increase in production and sale of flex-fuel vehicles. Many of these policies and incentives aim to mitigate the effects of climate change. If climate change policies were to change, the legal framework and incentive structure promoting the use of ethanol may also change, leading to a reduction in the demand for ethanol. In addition, any reduction in the percentage of ethanol required in fuel blended with gasoline or increase in the rates at which flex-fuel vehicles are taxed in Brazil, or any growth in the demand for natural gas and other fuels as an alternative to ethanol, lower gasoline prices or an increase in gasoline consumption (versus ethanol), may cause demand for ethanol to decline and affect our business.
Additionally, the recent COVID-19 outbreak and other market factors have resulted in a reduction in the demand for oil and related fuels, causing significant volatility in the price of, and a reduction in the demand for, ethanol. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on global markets, we cannot fully determine the extent of the reduction in the demand for ethanol, which, if sustained, may have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition. See “— Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are also closely correlated to the price of oil, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline in the price of oil will adversely affect our sugar and ethanol businesses and — The COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect our business and operating results.”
Growth in the sale and distribution of ethanol depends in part on infrastructure improvements, which may not occur on a timely basis, if at all.
In contrast to the well-established logistical operationsour Sugar, Ethanol and infrastructure supporting sugar exports,Energy segment, ethanol exports inherently demand much more complex preparation and means of distribution, including outlets from our facilities to ports and shipping to other countries. Substantial infrastructure development by persons and entities outside our control is required for our operations, and the ethanol industry generally, to grow. Areas requiring expansion include, but are not limited to, additional rail capacity, additional storage facilities for ethanol, increases in truck fleets capable of transporting ethanol within localized markets, expansion of refining and blending facilities to handle ethanol, growth in service stations equipped to handle ethanol fuels, and growth in the fleet of flex-fuel vehicles. Specifically, with respect to ethanol exports, improvements in consumer markets abroad are needed in the number and capacity of ethanol blending industrial plants, the distribution channels of gasoline-ethanol blends and the chains of distribution stations capable of handling fuel ethanol as an additive to gasoline. Substantial investments required for these infrastructure changes and expansions may not be made or they may not be made on a timely basis. Any delay or failure in making the changes in or expansion of infrastructure may hurt the demand for or prices of our products, prevent our products’ delivery, impose additional costs on us or otherwise have a serious adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial status. Our business relies on the continuing availability of infrastructure for ethanol production, storage and distribution, and any infrastructure disruptions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We may be harmed by competition from alternative fuels, products and production methods.
Ethanol competes in the biofuel market with other, established fuels such as biodiesel, as well as fuels that are still in the development phase, including methanol and butanol from biomass. Alternative fuels could become more successful than ethanol in the biofuels market over the medium or long term due to, for example, lower production costs, greater environmental benefits or other more favorable product characteristics. In addition, alternative fuels may also benefit from tax incentives or other more favorable governmental policies than those that apply to ethanol. Furthermore, our success depends on early identification of new developments relating to products and production methods and continuous improvement of existing expertise in order to ensure that our product range keeps pace with technological change. Competitors may gain an advantage over us by, for example, developing or using new products and production methods, introducing new products to the market sooner than we do, or securing exclusive rights to new technologies, thereby significantly harming our competitive position.
Our current insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover our potential losses.
Our production is, in general, subject to different risks and hazards, including adverse weather conditions, fires, diseases and pest infestations, other natural phenomena, industrial accidents, labor disputes, changes in the applicable legal and regulatory framework applicable to us, environmental contingencies and other natural or artificial phenomena. Our insurance currently covers only part of the losses we may incur and does not cover losses on crops due to hail storms, fires or similar risks. Furthermore, certain types of risks may not be covered by the policies we have for our industrial facilities. Additionally, we cannot guarantee that the indemnification paid by the insurer due to the occurrence of a casualty covered by our policies will be sufficient to entirely compensate us for our loss or damages suffered. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount desired at reasonable costs.
If we were to incur significant liability for which we were not fully insured, such liability could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may further incur additional expenses to mitigate the loss, such as shifting production to another facility. These costs may not be fully covered by our insurance.
Governmental policies reducing the amount of ethanol required to be added to gasoline, or eliminating tax incentives for flex-fuel vehicles, may adversely affect our business.
Governmental authorities of several countries, including Brazil and the United States, currently require the use of a certain percentage of anhydrous ethanol in gasoline. Since 1997, the Brazilian Sugar and Alcohol Inter-ministerial Council (Conselho Interministerial do Açúcar e Álcool), or “CIMA,” has fixed the percentage of anhydrous ethanol that must be used as an additive to gasoline. According to CIMA Resolution No. 1, dated March 4, 2015, the current percentage of anhydrous alcohol for regular gasoline is 27%, and for additive/premium gasoline, is 25%. According to data from the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustível), or the “ANP,” approximately one-half of all fuel ethanol in Brazil is used to fuel automobiles that run on a blend of anhydrous ethanol and gasoline; the remainder is used in either flex-fuel vehicles or vehicles powered by hydrous ethanol alone.
Other countries have similar governmental policies requiring various blends of anhydrous ethanol and gasoline. The United States currently requires the addition of 10% of ethanol into gasoline. The European Union is targeting 14% of energy used in the transportation sector to derive from renewable energy sources by 2030. Other countries such as Colombia and Canada have a 10% and 5% biofuel-blending mandate, respectively, while Argentina currently has a 12% ethanol blending. In March 2021, the British government announced that that by September 2021 it would require an increase from 5% to 10% in biofuel additives to petroleum products. Moreover, India has established a target of achieving 20% ethanol blending with petroleum by 2025. Any reductions in the percentage of ethanol to be added to gasoline or changes in Brazilian government policies related to the taxation and use of ethanol, as well as growth in the demand for natural gas and other fuels as an alternative to ethanol, such as natural gas, may cause us significant adverse effects.
In addition, flex-fuel and ethanol-powered vehicles in Brazil are entitled to a tax benefit in the form of a lower tax rate on manufactured products (imposto sobre produtos industrializados) and, therefore, are currently taxed at lower levels than gasoline-only vehicles. This incentive contributed to the increase in production and sale of flex-fuel vehicles, and many of these policies and incentives aim to mitigate the effects of climate change. If climate change policies were to change, the legal framework and incentive structure promoting the use of ethanol may also change, leading to a reduction in the demand for ethanol.
Growth in the sale and distribution of ethanol depends in part on infrastructure improvements, which may not occur on a timely basis, if at all.
In contrast to the well-established logistical operations and infrastructure supporting sugar exports, ethanol exports inherently demand much more complex preparation and means of distribution, including outlets from our facilities to ports and shipping to other countries. Substantial infrastructure development by persons and entities outside our control is required for our operations, and the ethanol industry generally, to grow. Areas requiring expansion include, but are not limited to, additional railroad capacity, additional storage facilities for ethanol, increases in truck fleets capable of transporting ethanol within localized markets, expansion of refining and blending facilities to handle ethanol, growth in service stations equipped to handle ethanol fuels, and growth in the fleet of flex-fuel vehicles. Specifically, with respect to ethanol exports, improvements in consumer markets abroad are needed in the number and capacity of ethanol blending industrial plants, the distribution channels of gasoline-ethanol blends and the chains of distribution stations capable of handling fuel ethanol as an additive to gasoline.
Substantial investments required for these infrastructure changes and expansions may not be made or they may not be made on a timely basis. Any delay or failure in making the changes in or expansion of infrastructure may hurt the demand for or prices of our products, prevent our products’ delivery, impose additional costs on us or otherwise have a serious adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial status. Our business relies on the continuing availability of infrastructure for ethanol production, storage and distribution, and any infrastructure disruptions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
A substantial portion of our assets is farmland that is highly illiquid.
Ownership of a significant portion of the land we operate is a key part of our business model. However, agricultural real estate is generally an illiquid asset. Moreover, the adoption of laws and regulations that impose limitations on ownership of rural land by foreigners in the jurisdictions in which we operate may also limit the liquidity of our farmland holdings. See “—Risks Related to Argentina—Argentine law concerningthe Countries in Which We Operate—Laws on the foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “—Risks Related to Brazil—Changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.properties.” As a result, it is unlikely that we will be able to promptly adjust our owned agricultural real estate portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic, business or regulatory conditions. IlliquidityA lack of liquidity in local market conditions may adversely affect our ability to complete dispositions, to receive proceeds generated from any such sales, or to repatriate any such proceeds.
We have entered into agriculture partnership agreements in respect of a significant portion of our sugarcane plantations.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, approximately 94.13%94.74% of our sugarcane plantations were leased through agriculture partnership agreements, for periods of an average of six to twelve years. We cannot guarantee that these agriculture partnerships will be renewed after their respective terms end. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to renew these agreements andend, or whether such renewals will be on terms and conditions satisfactory to us. Any failure to renew the agriculture partnerships or obtain land suitable for sugarcane planting in sufficient quantity and at reasonable prices to develop our activities could adversely affect our results of operations, increase our costs or force us to seek alternative properties, which may not be available or be available only at higher prices.
We may be subject to
Our performance depends on favorable working relationships with our employees and compliance with labor disputes from time to time that maylaws. Any strain on these relationships or increased labor costs could adversely affect us.our business.
Approximately 18% of our employees are represented by unions or equivalent bodies and are covered by collective bargaining or similar agreements which are subject to periodic renegotiation. We may not successfully conclude our labor negotiations on satisfactory terms, which may result in a significant increase in the cost of labor or may result in work stoppages or labor disturbances that disrupt our operations. Cost increases, work stoppages or disturbances that result in substantial amounts of raw product not being processed could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Furthermore, all benefits and obligations provided under collective agreements negotiated are binding upon all parties, and have legal and practical effects on employment agreements.
If we do not observe legal and conventional binding provisions, itwe may be susceptible to labor disputes filed by employees, Public Civil Actionclass actions filed by the Labor Public Prosecutionlabor prosecutors, and inspections by Labor Protection Agencies,labor protection agencies, resulting in the payment of legal and/or administrative sanctions.
Moreover, throughout 2021, the Brazilian government instituted the Emergency Employment and Income Preservation Benefit to mitigate the impact on companies and workers resulting from the economic slowdown. These measures included work-from-home policies, regardless of individual agreements, the suspension of labor contracts; the proportional reduction of hours and wages, the flexibilization of rights, and suppression of benefits through an individual agreement without the participation of the union. Consequently, there was an increase in labor claims questioning COVID-19- matters, the vaccination of employees, and the legality of these measures. An increase in labor claims against us may increase our costs and adversely affect our results of operations.
In addition, the Argentine government has enacted laws, regulations and decrees requiring companies in the private sector to increase wages and provide specified benefits to employees and may do so again in the future. Under Law No. 27,541, or the “Social Solidarity Law,” the Argentine government is empowered to, in its sole discretion, require mandatory salary increases for employees of the private sector. Such an increase occurred in January 2020, whereby the government required the payment of a one-time bonus of AR$4,000 to all workers in the private sector, payable in two installments in January 2020 and February 2020. This bonus and similar salary increases and additional payments could also have an effect on inflation. Furthermore, since June 2017, the minimum salary was raised from AR$10,000 to AR$38,940 (in nominal terms without adjustment for inflation). However, due to the high inflation, employers in both the public and private sectors have historically experienced, and currently are experiencing, significant pressure from organized labor and their employees to provide further increases in salaries. Since 2015, the Argentine Statistics and Census Agency (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos), or “INDEC”, has published the Salary Variation Index (Coeficiente de Variación Salarial), an index that shows the evolution of salaries and which shows an increase in registered private sector salaries of approximately 67.0% in 2019, 34.4% in 2020, and 56.5% in 2021. These increases were mainly in line with the inflation prevailing in Argentina. Similarly, on December 13, 2019, severance applicable in case without-cause termination was duplicated and capped at AR$500,000 and dismissals during the COVID-19 pandemic were prohibited. These latter measures are currently being reversed by Decree No. 886/2021, which orders the progressive reduction of the duplication of severance payments until its elimination on July 1, 2022 and does not make any reference to the extension of the prohibition of dismissals.
Further, the Argentine Teleworking Law, and its related regulation, entered into force in April 2021 and governs labor contracts in which employees work in part or in full outside the employer's premises on a regular basis, except for those who work in clients' offices. The law regulates several aspects applicable to this modality, such as the right to digital disconnection, the right to a working schedule that is compatible with care tasks, reversibility, compensation of expenses, provision of work tools, and transnational services, among others. The measure’s greatest impacts include the need to provide employees with working tools and to compensate for greater expenses arising from remote work. While many companies have already defined and applied measures to implement this law, many others are still in the planning stage, while some companies have chosen to implement a mixed on-site and remote work schedule (in which case the Teleworking Law applies proportionally).
We may not possess all of the permits and licenses required to operate our business, or we may fail to renew or maintain the licenses and permits we currently hold. Thishold which could subject us to fines and other penalties, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.penalties.
We are required to hold a variety of permits and licenses to conduct our farming and industrial operations, including but not limited to permits and licenses concerning land development, agricultural and harvesting activities, seed production, labor standards, occupational health and safety, land use, water use and other matters. We may not possess all of the permits
and licenses required for each of our business segments. In addition, the approvals, permits or licenses or renewals there ofthereof required by governmental agencies may change without substantial advance notice, and we could fail to obtain the approvals, permits or licenses required to expand our business. If we fail to obtain or to maintain such permits or licenses, or if renewals are granted with onerous conditions, we could be subject to fines and other penalties and be limited in the number or the quality of the products that we could offer. As a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We are
Our business is subject to extensive environmentalsignificant governmental regulation, which may adversely affect our results of operations and concerns regarding climate change may subject us to even stricter environmental regulations.financial condition.
Our activities are subject to a broad set of laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Such laws include compulsory maintenance of certain preserved areas within our properties, management of pesticides and associated hazardous waste and the acquisition and renewals of permits for water use and effluents disposal. In addition, the storage and processing of our products may create hazardous conditions. We could be exposed to civil, criminal and administrative penalties in addition to the obligation to remedy the adverse effects of our operations on the environment and to indemnify third parties for damages.
In addition, pursuant to Brazilian environmental legislation, the corporate entity of a company willentities can be disregarded (such that the owners of the company will be liable for itstheir debts) if necessary to guarantee the payment of costs related to the recovery of environmental damages whenever the legal entity is deemed by a court to be an obstacle to reimbursement of damages caused to the quality of the environment. Moreover, the relevant public authority may prevent us from using the property as long as environmental damages persist, which can directly affect the rent revenue stream of the agriculture partnership agreements. Because of the possibility of unanticipated regulatory measures or other developments, particularly as environmental laws become more stringent, the amount and timing of future expenditures required to maintain compliance could increase from current levels and could adversely affect the availability of funds for capital expenditures and other purposes. Compliance with existing or new environmental laws and regulations, as well as obligations in agreements with public entities, could result in increased costs and expenses.
Environmental laws and their enforcement are becoming more stringent in Argentina and Brazil, increasing the risk of and penalties associated with violations, which could impair or suspend our operations or projects and our operations expose us to potentially adverse environmental legislation and regulation. Failure to comply with past, present or future laws could result in the imposition of fines, third partythird-party claims, and investigation by environmental and police authorities and the relevant public attorney office. For example, the perceived effects of climate change may result in additional legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of our industrial facilities’ emissions. Such requirements, if enacted, could increase our capital expenditures and expenses for environmental compliance in the future, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, the denial of any permit that we have requested, or the revocation of any of the permits that we have already obtained, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Climate change may impose increased costs on our operations.
Climate change poses challenges and opportunities for our business. More stringent environmental regulations can result in the imposition of costs associated with greenhouse gas emissions, through requirements either by environmental agencies or through other measures of a regulatory nature, such as carbon taxation and the creation of market limitations on greenhouse gas emissions, which have the potential to increase our operating costs and reduce our production.
The risks associated with climate change can also include difficulties in accessing capital due to reputational problems with investors, changes in consumer profiles, reduced consumption of fossil fuels and energy transitions in the global economy toward a more low-carbon matrix, with the inclusion of substitute products for fossil fuels and the increased use of electricity for urban mobility. These factors may have a negative impact on the demand for our products and services and may burden or even render the implementation and operation of our projects unfeasible, thereby adversely impacting our results and financial condition and limiting some of our opportunities for growth.
Furthermore, the potential physical impacts of climate change are uncertain and may vary by region, which includes changes in rainfall patterns, water shortages, changing sea levels and changing temperature levels that could adversely impact our business operations, the location, costs and competitiveness of global agricultural production and related storage and processing facilities. Yields may also be affected by plagues, diseases or weed infections and related operational problems. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effects of Yield Fluctuations.”
Some of the agricultural commodities and food products that we produce contain genetically modified organisms ("GMO").organisms.
Our soybean, corn and cotton products contain GMOs in varying proportions depending on the year and the country of production. The use of GMOs in food has been met with varying degrees of acceptance in the markets in which we operate. In certain countries, adverse publicity about genetically modified food has led to governmental regulation limiting sales of GMO products in some of the markets in which our customers sell our products, including the European Union. It is possible that new restrictions on GMO products will be imposed in major markets for some of our products or that our customers will decide to purchase fewer GMO products or not buy GMO products at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects.
Increased regulationWe may face restrictions and penalties under consumer protection laws.
Brazil has a series of food safety could increase our costsstrict consumer protection statutes, collectively known as the Consumer Protection Code (Código de Defesa do Consumidor), which are intended to safeguard consumer interests and adversely affect our resultsthat apply to all companies in Brazil that supply products or services to Brazilian consumers. The Consumer Protection Code may apply to business customers if they are considered the “end user” of operations.the products provided. Regardless, courts may understand that the rules of the Consumer Protection Code should exceptionally apply to instances where the company acquiring the products as input to its supply chain are considered to be technically, legally and/or financially vulnerable towards us. In addition, the Consumer Protection Code provides for a series of contractual clauses that are held null and void by operation of law, whenever they reduce or limit its liability towards consumers; entail a waiver or disposal of rights; transfer liability to third parties; establish obligations considered inequitable or abusive that place the consumer at an unreasonable disadvantage; or that are incompatible with good faith or equitable practices, among others.
Our manufacturing facilitiesIn Brazil, penalties are often levied by the Brazilian Consumer Protection Agencies (Fundação de Proteção e Defesa do Consumidor), or “PROCONs” and products are subject to regular local,prosecutors, which oversee consumer issues on a district-by-district basis. Companies that operate across Brazil may face penalties from multiple PROCONs, as well as foreign, governmental inspectionsthe National Secretariat for Consumers (Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor). Companies may settle claims made by consumers via PROCONs and extensive regulationthe courts by paying compensation for violations directly to consumers and through a mechanism that allows them to adjust their conduct, called a conduct adjustment agreement (Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta), or “TAC.” Brazilian Public Prosecutor Offices may also commence investigations related to consumer rights violations and this TAC mechanism is also available for them. Companies that violate TACs face potential automatic fines. Brazilian prosecutors may also file class actions against companies in violation of consumer rights, seeking strict observation to the food safety area, including governmental food processing controls. We incur significant costs in connection withconsumer protection law provisions and compensation for the compliance of food and safety requirements and changes in government regulations relating to food safety could require us to make additional investments or incur additional costs to meet the necessary specifications for our products. Our products are often inspected by foreign food safety officials, and any failure to pass those inspections can result in our being required to return all or part of a shipment, destroy all or part of a shipment or incur costs because of delays in delivering products to our customers. Any tightening of food safety regulations could result in increased costs and coulddamages consumers may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.suffered.
If our products become contaminated,For instance, we may be subject to product liability claims, product recalls and restrictions on exports that would adversely affect our business.
for contaminated products. The sale of food products for human consumption involves the risk of injury to consumers. These injuries may result from tampering by third parties, bioterrorism, product contamination or spoilage, including the presence of bacteria, pathogens, foreign objects, substances, chemicals, other agents, or residues introduced during the growing, storage, handling or transportation phases.
We cannot be sure that consumption of our products will not cause a health-related illness in the future or that we will not be subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. The negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image, and we could also incur significant legal expenses.expenses and criminal charges. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this nature might not be covered by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
IFRS accounting standards related to biological assets require us to make numerous estimates in the preparation of our financial statements and therefore limit the comparability of our financial statements to similar issuers using U.S. GAAP.
IAS 41 “Biological Assets” requires that we measure our biological assets and agriculture produce at the point of harvest at fair value less costs to sell. Therefore, we are required to make assumptions and estimates relating to, among other things, future agricultural commodity yields, prices, and production costs extrapolated through a discounted cash flow method. For example, the value of our biological assets generated initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets amounting to a $227.7 million gain in 2021; $122.7 million gain in 2020 and a $68.6 million gain in 2019; $16.2 million gain in 2018 and a $63.2 million gain in 2017.2019. The assumptions and estimates used to determine the fair value of biological assets, and any changes to such prior estimates, directly affect our reported results of operations. If actual market conditions differ from our estimates and assumptions, there could be material adjustments to our results of operations. In addition, the use of such discounted cash flow method utilizing these future estimated metrics differs from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). As a result, our financial statements and reported earnings are not directly comparable to those of similar companies in the United States.
We have substantialOur indebtedness which could impair theirour financial condition and decrease the amount of dividends we receive.impair our ability to receive or pay out dividends.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had $678.0$618 million of net debt outstanding on a consolidated basis, including our $500 million ofSenior Notes 2027, incurred by Adecoagro S.A. Certaindue 2027.Certain of our subsidiaries in Argentina and Brazil have a substantial amount of debt, which requires significant principal and interest payments. Such indebtedness could affect our subsidiaries’ future operations, for example, by requiring a substantial portion of their cash flows from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness instead of funding working capital and capital improvements and other investments. The substantial amount of debt incurred by us and our subsidiaries also imposes significant debt obligations, increasing our cost of borrowing to satisfy business needs and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing.
The substantial level of indebtedness borne by certain of our subsidiaries also affects the amount of cash available to them to pay as dividends, increasing our vulnerability to economic downturns or other adverse developments relative to competitors with less leverage, and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other corporate purposes in the future. Moreover, our indebtedness places limits on our ability to make acquisitions or needed capital expenditures or to pay dividends to our shareholders.
The terms of our indebtedness and that of certain of our subsidiaries impose significant restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility.
The terms of our Senior Notes due 2027 and the debt instruments of some of our subsidiaries contain customary covenants including limitations on our ability to, among other things, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; make restricted payments, including dividends and prepaying indebtedness; create or permit liens; enter into business combinations and asset sale transactions; make investments, including capital expenditures; and enter into new businesses. Some of these debt instruments are also secured by various collateral including mortgages on farms, pledges of subsidiary stock and liens on certain facilities, equipment and accounts. Some of these debt instruments also contain cross-default provisions, where a default on one loan by one subsidiary could result in lenders of otherwise performing loans declaring a default. These restrictions could limit our ability to obtain future financing, withstand a future downturn in business or the economy in general, conduct operations or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities that may arise. Moreover, by reducing the level of dividends we may receive, the terms of our subsidiaries’ indebtedness placesplace limits on our ability to make acquisitions or needed capital expenditures or to pay dividends to our shareholders.
The financial ratio covenants we are currently required to meet, some of which are measured on a combined basis aggregating results of the borrowing subsidiaries and others which are measured on an individual debtor basis, include, among others, debt service coverage, minimum liquidity and leverage ratios.
The failure to maintain applicable financial ratios, in certain circumstances, would prevent us from borrowing additional amounts and could result in a default under such indebtedness. If we or our subsidiaries are unable to repay those amounts, the affected lenders could initiate bankruptcy-related proceedings or enforce their rights to the collateral securing such indebtedness, which would have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Fluctuations in interest rates could have a significant impact on our results of operations, indebtedness and cash flow.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, approximately 89.7%US$626.8 million of our total debt on a consolidated basis was subject to fixed interest rates, and 10.3%US$190.8 million was subject to variable interest rates. As of December 31, 2019,2021, borrowings incurred by the Company’sour subsidiaries in Brazil were repayable at various dates between January 20202022 and November 2027 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 2.5%1.65% to 7.95% per annum or variable or variable rates based on LIBOR, TaxaBrazilian Long-Term Interest Rate (Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo (TJLP); ÍPrazo), the Brazilian Broad Consumer Prices Index (Índice de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo (IPCA)Amplo), CDIand the Brazilian interbank rate (taxa do certificado de depósito bancário), or other specific base-ratesthe “CDI rate” plus spreads ranging from 0.7%1.62% to 6.99%4.24% per annum. At December 31, 2019, LIBOR (six months) was 1.91%. Borrowings incurred by the Company´sour subsidiaries in Argentina are repayable at various dates between January 20202022 and June 20242028 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 5.7%0.0% to 7.5%6.2% per annum. Significant interest rate increases can have an adverse effect on our profitability, liquidity and financial position. Currently, our variable interest rate exposure is mainly linked to the LIBOR rate plus specified spreads. If interest rates increase, whether because of an increase in market interest rates or an increase in our own cost of borrowing, our debt service obligations for our variable rate indebtedness would increase, and our net income could be adversely affected.
We are also exposed to the risk of interest rate variations in relation to the U.S. dollar London Interbank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”). Volatility in LIBOR or other reference rates could increase our periodic interest payments and have an adverse effect on our total financing costs. We may be unable to adequately adjust our prices to offset any increased financing costs, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Moreover, interest rate, equity, foreign exchange rate and other types of indices which are deemed to be “benchmarks” are the subject of increased regulatory scrutiny. On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, (the authority thatwhich regulates LIBOR)LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. It is unclear whether new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such
Further, on November 30, 2020, the ICE Benchmark Administration, or the “IBA”, announced that it continuesplanned to exist after 2021. The U.S.consult on its intention to cease the publication of one-week and two-month LIBOR on December 31, 2021, and the overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month and 12-month LIBOR tenors on June 30, 2023. That same day, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency jointly responded to the IBA’s announcement by encouraging banks to stop writing contracts referencing LIBOR as soon as possible (and in conjunction withany event by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, is considering replacing U.S. dollarend of 2021, subject to certain limited exceptions), stating that entering into new contracts that use LIBOR withas a newly created index, calculated basedreference rate after December 31, 2021, and failing to prepare for disruptions to LIBOR (including operating without robust fallback language that includes a clearly defined alternative reference rate), could cause significant issues if not addressed. These announcements indicate that the continuation of LIBOR on repurchase agreements backed by treasury securities. . the current basis cannot and will likely not be guaranteed after June 2023 and may be subject to significant disruption after December 2021.
It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates in the United Kingdom, the United States or elsewhere. See also the discussion of interest rate risk in “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk-”RiskRisk”. The transition process may involve, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that currently rely on LIBOR. The transition may also result in reductions in the value of Fluctuationscertain instruments or the effectiveness of related transactions such as hedges, increased borrowing costs, uncertainty under applicable documentation, or difficult and costly consent processes. Any such effects of the transition away from LIBOR, as well as other unforeseen effects, may result in Interest Rates.”losses or increases in financing costs with respect to our indebtedness, expenses, difficulties, complications, or delays in connection with future financing efforts, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Also,In addition, changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments can result in a non-cash charge or gain being recognized in our financial results for a period preceding the period or periods in which settlement occurs under the derivative instruments and interest payments are made. Changes or shifts in interest rates can significantly impact the valuation of our derivatives and therefore could expose us to substantial mark-to-market losses or gains if interest rates fluctuate materially from the time when the derivatives were entered into. Accordingly, fluctuations in interest rates may impact our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. See "NoteNote 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements".Statements.
We may need additional capital and we may not be able to renewobtain it.
We believe that our credit lines when they mature, deprivingexisting cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations and ability to raise financing are and will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for the foreseeable future. We may, however, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If these resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain other sources of financing. The sale of additional equity securities could result in dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness could result in increased debt service obligations and could require us to agree to operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations.
Our ability to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms is subject to a variety of needed liquidity.uncertainties, including:
Certain•conditions of the U.S. capital markets and other capital markets in which we may seek to raise funds;
•our future results of operations and financial condition;
•government regulation of foreign investment in the United States, Europe, and Latin America; and
•global economic, political, and other conditions in jurisdictions in which we do business.
Moreover, certain of our subsidiaries rely substantially on existing uncommitted credit lines to support their operations and business needs through the agricultural harvest cycle. If we are unable to renew these credit lines, or if we cannot replace such credit lines with other borrowing facilities, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
There is a risk that we could be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could materially increase our U.S. federal income tax liability and subject any dividends we pay to U.S. federal withholding tax.
WeImmediately prior to our IPO, we acquired approximately 98% of IFH, a holding company, which was a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes organized under the laws of Delaware immediately prior to our IPO, in exchange for our common shares. Under U.S. Internal Revenue Code section 7874(b), we would be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation if we were deemed to have acquired substantially all of the assets constituting the trade or business of a U.S. domestic partnership and former members of
IFH were deemed to own at least 80% of our common shares by reason of the transfer of those trade or business assets (ignoring common shares issued in our IPO for purposes of the 80% threshold). The rules mentioned above are unclear in certain respects and there is limited guidance on the application of the rules to partnership acquisitions. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)or the “IRS” will not seek to assert that we are a U.S. domestic corporation, which assertion if successful could materially increase our U.S. federal income tax liability and require us to withhold tax from any dividends we pay to holders of our common shares who are not United States persons within the meaning of U.S. Internal Revenue Code section 7701(a) (30). See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation”.
We may be classified by the IRS as a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”),company,” which may result in adverse tax consequences for U.S. investors.
Whether the Companywe will be a PFICpassive foreign investment company, or a “PFIC,” for the current or future tax year will depend on the Company’sour assets and income over the course of each such tax year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this Form 20-F.annual report. Under circumstances where theour cash is not deployed for active purposes, our risk of becoming a PFIC may increase. Although the determination of whether a corporation is a PFIC is made annually, and thus may be subject to change, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our most recently completed taxable year. However, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for any taxable year. If we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. investor held common shares, certain adverse tax consequences could apply to such U.S. investor. A U.S. taxpayer who holds stock in a foreign corporation during any year in which such corporation qualifies as a PFIC may mitigate such negative tax consequences by making certain U.S. federal income tax elections, which are subject to numerous restrictions and limitations. Holders of the Company’s common shares are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Company’s common shares. See “Material“Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders—Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) Rules”.Rules.”
We are subject to anti-corruption,anticorruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and other international trade laws and regulations.
We are subject to anti-corruption,anticorruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and other international trade laws and regulations. We are required to comply with the laws and regulations of Brazil and other jurisdictions where we conduct operations. In particular, we are subject to the Brazilian Anti-corruption Law No 12,846,12,846/2013, to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the “FCPA,” to the United Kingdom Bribery Act of 2010, as well as economic sanction programs, including those administered by the United Nations, the European Union and the United States, including the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control,Control.
Law No. 12,846/2013, or “OFAC.the “Brazilian Anticorruption Law,” imposes strict liability on companies, in the civil and administrative spheres, for acts contrary to the Brazilian federal public administration practiced by their directors, administrators, collaborators or third parties acting on their behalf or benefit. Among the sanctions applied are fines, loss of assets, rights and values illicitly obtained, suspension or partial interdiction of activities, prohibition on contracting with the government or receiving benefits or tax or credit incentives and confiscation of assets, which sanctions, if applied, could adversely affect our results. In Brazil, other laws that provide for violations related to corruption and unlawful acts against the Public Administration are also applicable to us, such as Law No. 8,492/1992 (as amended by Law No. 14,230, dated October 25, 2021), or the “Administrative Misconduct Law,” which also provides for penalties that include the prohibition to enter into contracts with the government for a period of up to 14 years. Our governance structure, internal control mechanisms, risk management and compliance may not be sufficient or capable of preventing or detecting (i) violations of the Anticorruption Law, the Administrative Misconduct Law or other rules related to combating corruption and fraud, (ii) occurrences of fraudulent or dishonest behavior on the part of our managers, employees, subsidiaries, controllers, affiliates or any contracted individuals and legal entities and other agents acting on our behalf or for our benefit or on behalf and for the benefit of such parties or (iii) other occurrences of behavior not in line with ethical principles, which may adversely affect our reputation, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations, or the price of the securities issued by us.
Law No. 27,401/2017, or the “Argentinian Corporate Criminal Liability Law,” makes legal entities criminally liable for local or international bribery and influence peddling, negotiations that are incompatible with public office, illegal payments made to public officials under the appearance of taxes or fees owed to the relevant government agency, illegal enrichment of public officers and employees, and producing aggravated false balance sheets and reports to cover up local or international bribery or influence peddling. Legal entities shall be liable when these crimes are committed, directly or indirectly, with their intervention or on their behalf, interest or Benefit and are only exempted from liability if the individual who committed the crime acted exclusively in his/her own benefit and without benefit for the entity. Legal entities may be convicted even if it is not possible to identify or convict the individual involved in the crime, provided that the circumstances of the case allow for
establishing that the crime could not have been committed without tolerance of the authorities of the legal entity. Although previous drafts of the bill included sections making controlling entities liable for economic penalties imposed on their subsidiaries under this law, such articles were removed from the law as approved by Congress. Among the sanctions applied are fines, loss of assets, rights and values illicitly obtained, suspension or partial interdiction of activities, prohibition on contracting with the government or receiving benefits or tax or credit incentives and confiscation of assets, which sanctions, if applied, could adversely affect our results.
The FCPA prohibits providing anything of value to foreign officials for the purposes of obtaining or retaining business or securing any improper business advantage. As part of our business, we may deal with entities and employees which are considered foreign officials for purposes of the FCPA. In addition, economic sanctions programs restrict our dealings with certain sanctioned countries, individuals and entities. When issues arise, we attempt to act promptly to learn relevant facts, conduct appropriate due diligence, and take any appropriate remedial action to address the risk. There can be no assurance that our internal policies and procedures will be sufficient to prevent or detect all inappropriate practices, fraud or violations of law by our employees, directors, officers, partners, agents and service providers or that such persons will not take actions in violation of our policies and procedures (or otherwise in violation of the relevant anticorruption laws and sanctions regulations) for which we or they may be ultimately held responsible.
Violations of anti-bribery and anticorruption laws and sanctions regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we may be subject to one or more enforcement actions, investigations and proceedings by authorities for alleged infringements of these laws. These proceedings may result in penalties, fines, sanctions or other forms of liability and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot predict whether future investigations, developments from current investigations or allegations involving us or involving any of our affiliates, officers, employees, shareholders or members of our Board of Directors or any third parties related to us in any way will arise. In the event of investigations, allegations or developments, our reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations, as well as the price of the securities issued by us, may be adversely affected.
We may be adversely affected by the ongoing armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
The ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine has disrupted supply chains and international trade generally. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine beginning on February 24, 2022, the United States, the United Kingdom, the E.U. and other countries announced broad economic sanctions against Russia, including financial measures such as freezing Russia’s central bank assets and limiting its ability to access its U.S. dollar reserves. The United States, the E.U. and the United Kingdom have also banned people and businesses from dealings with the Russian central bank, its finance ministry and its wealth fund. Selected Russian banks will also be removed from Swift messaging system, which enables the smooth transfer of money across borders. Other sanctions by the United Kingdom include major Russian banks being excluded from the United Kingdom financial system, stopping them from accessing sterling and clearing payments, major Russian companies and the state being stopped from raising finance or borrowing money on the United Kingdom markets, and the establishment of limits on deposits Russians can make at United Kingdom banks. The United States, the E.U. and the United Kingdom adopted personal measures, such as sanctions on individuals with close ties to Mr. Putin, and placed visa restrictions on several oligarchs, as well as their family members and close associates, and freezing of assets.
While the precise effect of the ongoing war and these sanctions on the Russian and global economies remains uncertain, they have already resulted in significant volatility in financial markets, depreciation of the Russian ruble and the Ukrainian hryvnia against the U.S. dollar and other major currencies, as well as an increase in energy and commodity prices globally. As a result, in particular, the availability and pricing of fertilizers for the 2022/2023 harvest is subject to significant uncertainty in Brazil and Argentina. From a supply point of view, Brazil and Argentina are highly dependent on fertilizer imports, and Russia and Belarus hold a significant market share in Brazilian and Argentine soil fertilizer imports (a share that is higher for potash-based products). In addition, fertilizer prices, which had already risen before the conflict, have continued to rise and have led producers to delay purchase negotiations. As a result of such supply risk and the slow pace of the market at present, we expect that there may be shortages of some types of fertilizers (mainly for potash-based products). We may also be unsuccessful in finding alternative direct imports from nonsanctioned regions or in increasing our prices to reflect increased supply costs in the future. Failure to obtain fertilizer on favorable terms, sufficient quantities or at all could have a material adverse effect on our production capacity.
Finally, geopolitical tension in petroleum-producing countries can affect the global supply and lead prices to rally. The war in Ukraine led to oil prices reaching as high as US$139 per barrel, the highest price since 2008. Although this positively
impacted ethanol demand and prices, we cannot assure you that such geopolitical tension will not come to adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Technological advances or alternative products may affect demand for our products and services or require substantial capital investments to remain competitive.
Technological advances may affect demand for products or require substantial capital investments to remain competitive. The development and implementation of new technologies can result in a significant reduction in the costs of the products and services we distribute. We cannot predict when new technologies may become available or the effects of these events on our business. Advances in the development of alternatives to the products and services we currently distribute can significantly reduce demand or eliminate the need for them. Any advances in technology that require significant capital investments to ensure competitiveness, or that otherwise reduce demand for our services, will have a material adverse effect on our business and financial performance. In addition, any other alternative products or technological advances that reduce demand for our services could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our technology infrastructure and information and expose us to processes disruption and liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we depend on technology to carry out our business. We also collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our customers and suppliers, and personally identifiable information of our employees, in our data centers and on our networks. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations. In addition, these systems may require modifications or upgrades as a result of technological changes or growth in our business. Although we take actions to secure our systems and electronic information and have disaster recovery plans in case of incidents that could cause major disruptions to our business, these measures may not be enough.
Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks, our systems, and eventually suffer from systems disruption and/or having the information stored there accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, fines from governmental authorities, disrupt our operations, damage our reputation, and cause over costs to remedy the harm suffered, which could adversely affect our business/operating margins, revenues and competitive position.
We depend on our information technology systems and any failure of these systems could adversely affect our business.
We depend on information technology systems for significant elements of our operations, including data storage and retrieval of critical business information. Our information technology systems are vulnerable to damage from a variety of sources, including network failures, malicious human acts and natural disasters. In addition, some of our servers are potentially vulnerable to physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses and similar disruptive issues. Failures or significant disruptions to our information technology systems or those used by our third-party service providers may prevent us from conducting our general business operations. Any disruption or loss of information technology systems on which critical aspects of our operations depend could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, we store highly confidential information on our information technology systems, including information related to our products. If our servers or third-party servers on which our data is stored are attacked by a physical or electronic break-in, computer virus or any other malicious human action, our confidential information may be stolen, unlawfully disclosed or destroyed. Any security breach involving misappropriation, loss or unauthorized disclosure or use of confidential information of our suppliers, customers or others, whether by us or by third parties, could subject us to civil and criminal penalties, have a material negative impact on our brands and reputation, create relevant legal and financial exposure, result in loss of customer confidence, or decrease the use of our products and services, any of which results may have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and reputation.
Our security measures may also be breached by human error, wrongdoing, system errors or vulnerabilities, or other irregularities. Our measures to monitor and develop information technology infrastructure and networks may not be effective in protecting us against cyberattacks and other breaches related to our information technology systems. The techniques used to gain unauthorized, improper or illegal access to our systems, data or data from our customers, to disable or degrade services, or to sabotage systems are constantly evolving, can be difficult to detect quickly and often are not recognized until they are used
against a target. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities by various means, including, but not limited to, hacking into our systems or those of our customers, partners or suppliers, or attempting to fraudulently induce our employees, customers, partners, suppliers or other users of our systems to disclose usernames, passwords, financial information or other confidential information, which in turn may be used to access our information technology systems. Certain third-party efforts to access information technology systems can be supported by significant financial and technological resources, making them even more sophisticated and difficult to detect.
Noncompliance with data protection laws could adversely affect our business.
Personal privacy, information security, and data protection are significant issues globally. The regulatory framework governing the collection, processing, storage, use and sharing of certain information, particularly financial and other personal data, is rapidly evolving and is likely to continue to be subject to uncertainty and varying interpretations. The occurrence of unanticipated events and the development of evolving technologies often rapidly drive the adoption of legislation or regulation affecting the use, collection or other processing of data and the manner in which we conduct our business. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with our privacy policies or any applicable privacy, security or data protection, information security or consumer-protection related laws, regulations, orders or industry standards in one or more jurisdictions could expose us to costly litigation, significant awards, fines or judgments, civil and criminal penalties or negative publicity, and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In particular, on August 14, 2018, the President of Brazil enacted Law No. 13,709 the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados) or the “LGPD,” which came into force on September 18, 2020, a comprehensive data protection law establishing general principles and obligations that apply across multiple economic sectors and contractual relationships. The LGPD applies to individuals or legal entities, private or government entities, who process personal data in Brazil or collect personal data in Brazil or, further, when the processing activities have the purpose of offering or supplying goods or services to data subjects located in Brazil. The LGPD establishes detailed rules for the collection, use, processing and storage of personal data (including personal data of clients, suppliers and employees), and affects all economic sectors, including the relationship between customers and suppliers of goods and services, employees and employers and other relationships in which personal data is collected, whether in a digital or physical environment. Specifically, the LGPD establishes, among other things, personal data owners’ rights, the legal basis for personal data protection, requirements for obtaining consent from data owners, obligations and requirements related to security incidents, data leaks and data transfers, as well as the creation of the National Data Protection Authority (Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados), or the “ANPD,” for the purposes of monitoring, implementing and supervising compliance with the LGPD in Brazil. In the event of noncompliance with the LGPD, we may be subject to penalties, including (1) warnings, with the impositions of a deadline for the adoption of corrective measures; (2) a one-time fine of up to 2% (subject to an upper limit of R$50,000,000) of our revenue; (3) a daily fine (subject to an upper limit of R$50,000,000); (4) public disclosure of the violation; (5) the restriction of access to the personal data to which the violation relates, until corrective measures are implemented; (6) deletion of the personal data to which the violation relates; (7) partial suspension of the databases to which the violation relates for up to 12 months, until corrective measures are implemented; (8) suspension of the personal data processing activities to which the violation relates for up to 12 months; and (9) partial or full prohibition on personal data processing activities. While we have put in place systems and processes to comply with the LGPD, we cannot assure you that our LGPD compliance efforts will be deemed appropriate or sufficient by regulatory authorities or by courts, such as the Brazilian Public Prosecution Office (Ministério Público). Moreover, as the LGPD requires further regulation from the ANPD regarding several aspects of the law, which are yet unknown, and we may have difficulty adapting our systems and processes to the new legislation due to the legislation’s complexity. The changes have impacted, and could further adversely impact, our business by increasing our operational and compliance costs.
In Argentina, Law No. 25,326 on the Protection of Personal Data, or the “LPPD,” regulates issues related to the protection of data stored in files, records, databases, or other technical means of data processing, whether these are public or private, to guarantee the right to honor and privacy of people, as well as access to the information that is recorded about them. The owner of personal data has the power to exercise the right of access to them free of charge at intervals of no less than six months, unless a legitimate interest is proven for this purpose in accordance with the LPPD. The Agency for Access to Public Information, in its capacity as enforcement authority of LPPD, has the power to deal with complaints and claims filed by those who are affected by their rights due to breach of current regulations on personal data protection.
Any additional privacy laws, rules or regulations enacted or approved in Brazil, Argentina or in other jurisdictions in which we operate could cause us to incur costs to correct the breaches or failures, expose us to uninsured liability, increase our risk of regulatory scrutiny, subject us to lawsuits and result in the imposition of material penalties and fines under state and federal laws or regulations, which could seriously harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. Any failure,
real or perceived, by us to comply with our privacy policies or with any regulatory requirements or orders or other local, state, federal or international privacy or consumer protection-related laws and regulations could cause customers to reduce their purchases of our agricultural products and services and could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our operations are subject to disruptions by third parties who interfere with the possession of our real estate or our means of production.
Our operations are subject to disruption by third parties, including through illegal burnings, the invasion or occupation of our real estate, and the blocking of roads and agricultural land by members of certain social movements, environmental protection movements, as well as indigenous peoples, all of which is common practice in, and affects, the industry. In certain regions, including those where we own property or lease land, available remedies, such as police protection and litigation, may be inadequate or nonexistent. In these cases, our operations, image and reputation may be affected, and we may be subject to legal and administrative litigation that may result in criminal and administrative penalties, including, but not limited to, suspension, shutdowns, and a requirement to pay fines, which may also result in the need for additional investments. In addition, we may be subject to civil liabilities for environmental damage, which includes the obligation to redress any damages caused to the environment and/or public health. The demonstration of the cause-and-effect relationship between the damage caused and action or omission is sufficient to trigger the obligation to redress environmental damage.
Moreover, social movements are active in Brazil and advocate land reform and mandatory property redistribution by the Brazilian government. Land invasions and occupations of rural areas by a large number of individuals is common practice for these movements, and, in certain areas, including those in which we have invested or are likely to invest, police protection and effective eviction proceedings are not available to land owners. As a result, we cannot assure you that our properties will not be subject to invasion or occupation by these groups. A land invasion or occupation could materially impair the normal use of our lands or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or the value of our common shares. In addition, our land may be subject to expropriation by the Brazilian government. Under the Brazilian Federal Constitution, the Brazilian government may expropriate land that is not in compliance with mandated local “social functions.” A “social function” is defined as including: (i) the rational and adequate use of land; (ii) the adequate use of natural resources available and preservation of the environment; (iii) compliance with labor laws; and (iv) the use of land to promote welfare of owners and employees. If the Brazilian government decides to expropriate any of our properties, our results of operations may be adversely affected, to the extent that potential compensation to be paid by the Brazilian government may be less than the profit we could make from the sale or use of such land. Disputing the Brazilian government’s expropriation of land is usually time-consuming and the outcomes of such challenges are uncertain. In addition, we may be forced to accept public debt bonds, which have limited liquidity, as compensation for expropriated land instead of cash.
In addition, along with the expropriation rights, Brazilian law also confers to the government the power to create public easements over third-party property. Public easements are commonly used where infrastructure projects require the use of multiple plots of land, in particular in rural areas (e.g. transmission lines or oil and gas pipelines). Public easements require the payment of fair and prior indemnification, which authorizes the government to use such property for the public interest. The creation of a public easement must observe the same procedures applicable for the expropriation of real property. However, unlike expropriation, the public easement does not remove the property from the owners' estate, but only creates the right of using the property or part of it. The creation of a public easement on our land, including on our farmland, will mean we will be prevented from using the relevant piece of land, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks associated withRelated to the Countries in which we operateWhich We Operate
We operate our business in emerging markets.
Our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon economic conditions in thosethe emerging countries in which we operate, and any decline in economic conditions could harm our results of operations or financial condition.operate.
All of our operations and/or development activities are in South America. As of December 31, 2019,2021, based on total asset value, 43.7%50.1% of our assets were located in Argentina, 50.1%44.7% in Brazil and 1.9%1.5% in Uruguay. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 51.8%2021, 25.9% were attributable to our Argentine operations, 35.2% of our consolidated sales of goods and services rendered were attributable to our Brazilian operations 25.7% were attributable to our Argentine operations and 22.4%39.0% were attributable to our Uruguayan operations. In the future, we expect to have additional operations in the South American countries in which we now operate or in other countries with similar political, economic and social conditions. Many of these countries have a history of economic instability or crises (such as inflation or recession), government deadlock, political instability, civil strife, changes in laws and regulations, expropriation or nationalization of property, and exchange controls which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In particular, fluctuations in the economies of Argentina, Brazil and BrazilUruguay, and actions adopted by the governments of those countries have had and may continue to have a significant impact on companies operating in those countries, including us. Specifically, we have been affected and may continue to be affected by high levels of inflation, increased interest rates, fluctuations in the value of the Argentine Pesopeso and the Brazilian Realreal against foreign currencies, wage controls, price and foreign exchange controls, regulatory policies, business and tax regulations, political and social tension, and in general by the political, social and economic scenarios in Argentina and Brazil and in other countries that may affect Argentina and Brazil.
The Argentine economy has experienced significant volatility in past decades, including numerous periods of low or negative growth and high and variable levels of inflation and currency devaluation. Inflation remains a challenge for Argentina given its persistent nature in recent years and also considering its high levels during 2019. No assurances can be given that the rate of growth experienced over past years will be achieved in future years or that the national economy will not suffer a recession. If economic conditions in Argentina were to continue slowing down, or contract, if inflation were to accelerate further, or if the Argentine government's measures to attract or retain foreign investment and international financing in the future to incentivize domestic economy activity are unsuccessful, such developments could adversely affect Argentina's economic growth and in turn affect our financial health and results of operations.
Moreover, on November 14, 2021 the current Argentine presidential administration suffered a setback after losing a majority in the Argentine Congress following midterm legislative elections. The opposing party representing the former administration obtained five seats in the Senate, causing the current administration to lose quorum in the Senate. Furthermore, other political forces, including conservative and libertarian parties, and far-left parties, also obtained seats in Congress. The results of the midterm legislative elections have generated uncertainty with respect to the overall implementation of the current administration’s economic and political agenda (including the interventions described below). The lack of predictability of political and economic measures that may be adopted in the future could impact our financial projections, which may in turn affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In Brazil, markets have experienced an increase in volatility due to uncertainties resulting from ongoing investigations conducted by the Brazilian Federal Police and the Brazilian Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office, including Lava Jato, which have negatively impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment, and contributed to a decline in market confidence in Brazil. Members of the federal government and legislative branch, in addition to senior managers of large companies, are being prosecuted for corruption for allegedly accepting bribes for contracts awarded by the government to infrastructure, oil and gas, and construction companies, among others. As of the date of this offering memorandum, investigations have been carried out at various hierarchical levels of public administration. Historically, these investigations had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the companies involved and on the general perception of the Brazilian market. In particular, the Brazilian oil and gas industry has been adversely affected by these investigations in the past. Any consequences arising from these investigations, including the removal of authorities or elected officeholders, among others, may have a material adverse effect on the political and economic environment in Brazil, as well as on Brazilian companies, including us. We cannot predict whether ongoing investigations and their consequent developments will lead to further political and economic instability, nor whether new allegations against government officials and executives and/or private companies will emerge in the future. We also cannot predict the results of these investigations or their impact on the Brazilian economy or the Brazilian stock market.
In addition, the President of Brazil has the power to enact policies and issue orders relating to the Brazilian economy, including in the sector in which we operate, through specific regulations or through their control over Petrobras, our sole supplier of gasoline, diesel and certain other oil products, which could affect our operations and financial performance in Brazil. Political and economic uncertainty and any new policies or changes in current policies could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects. And any difficulty by the Brazilian government in obtaining a majority in the national Congress could result in congressional stalemate, political unrest and massive demonstrations and/or strikes that could adversely affect our operations. Uncertainties in relation to the implementation, by the current government, of changes related to monetary, fiscal and social security policies, as well as to the pertinent legislation, can contribute to economic instability. These uncertainties and new measures may increase the volatility of the Brazilian securities market, and issues may be exacerbated by the Brazilian presidential election to be held in October 2022.
Economic and political conditions in the countries in which we operate, and the perception of these conditions in international markets, may adversely impact our business, our access to the capital and debt markets, our results of operations and financial condition.
The Brazilian and Argentine economies have experienced extreme volatility in recent decades, with uneven periods of economic growth, periods of high inflation and devaluation of the Argentine peso and the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar. Our business and operations may be affected by the economic and political events that may affect the Brazilian and Argentine
economies, such as price controls, foreign exchange controls, currency devaluations, high interest rates, increased public expenditures, tax increase or other regulatory initiatives.
The credibility of several Argentine economic indices during the Ms. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner administration (between 2004 through 2015) has been called into question. By previously understating inflation, INDEC overstated economic growth in real terms. The adjustments made by the Mr. Mauricio Macri administration to INDEC, beginning in 2016, led to a determination of real GDP growth of 48.6% between 2004 and 2015 rather than the officially reported 65% growth. Because of these reforms, on November 9, 2016, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund, or the “IMF,” lifted its censure on Argentina, noting that Argentina had resumed the publication of data in a manner consistent with its obligations under the Articles of Agreement of the IMF. On June 29, 2017, INDEC also published revised GDP data for the years 2004 through 2015. According to INDEC, Argentina’s GDP grew by 2.9% in 2017, decreased by 2.5% in 2018, decreased by 2.2% in 2019, decreased by 10.0% in 2020, and increased 11.9% in 2021. According to the IMF, Argentina’s GDP is expected to increase by 2.5% in 2022. Moreover, since 2015, international commodity prices for Argentina’s primary commodity exports have fluctuated, which has had an adverse effect on Argentina’s economic growth. Relying on the export of certain commodities, such as soy, has made the Argentine economy more vulnerable to fluctuations in the prices of commodities. If international commodity prices decline, the Argentine economy could be adversely affected. In addition, adverse weather conditions can affect the production of commodities by the agricultural sector, which accounts for a significant portion of Argentina's export revenues.
In 2019, Mr. Alberto Fernandez and Ms. Fernández de Kirchner were elected president and vice-president, respectively. Markets reacted negatively to this result, and economic conditions in Argentina continued to deteriorate. Due to, among other things, the rise of inflation, the continued demand for salary increases, the growth of the fiscal deficit, the required payments to be made on public debt, the reduction of industrial growth, the recession and the increase of the capital outflows from Argentina, the Macri administration reintroduced rigid restrictions and foreign exchange controls in September 1, 2019, which, among other things, significantly curtailed access to the official foreign exchange market (the Mercado Libre de Cambios) by individuals and entities. See “Item 10. Additional Information—D. Exchange Controls.” During 2019 and early 2020, social and political tension and high levels of poverty and unemployment persisted while industrial activity and consumption diminished considerably. The deterioration of the economy significantly increased the social and political turmoil, including civil unrest, riots, looting, nationwide protests, strikes and street demonstrations. Due to the high levels of inflation and devaluation, employers both in the public and private sectors are experiencing significant pressure from organized labor unions and their employees to further increase salaries. On December 23, 2019, the Social Solidarity Law was enacted. The Social Solidarity Law decreed a public emergency in economic, financial, fiscal, administrative, social security, tariff, energy, health and social matters. As a result of this measure, the Argentine President and Congress gained considerable powers to alter governmental policies and measures related to the Argentine economy. However, the decline in the GDP in Argentina, the deepening recession and the increase of the unemployment has led to an increase in poverty, which, according to INDEC, as of June 30, 2021 affected more than 40.6% of the population. We cannot now fully estimate the impact that the measures currently adopted by the government, or those that it may implement in the future, will have on the Argentine economy as a whole and on the business, equity and results of our operations. Continuing inflation, increase in unemployment, decline in GDP, peso depreciation, and/or other future economic, social and political developments in Argentina, over which we have no control, may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Moreover, a significant portion of our operations, properties and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on economic conditions in Brazil. Historically, Brazil’s political situation has influenced the performance of the Brazilian economy, and political crises have affected the confidence of investors and the general public, which has resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities issued abroad by Brazilian companies. Future developments in policies of the Brazilian government and/or the uncertainty of whether and when such policies and regulations may be implemented may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. The Brazilian economy has experienced significant volatility in recent decades, characterized by periods of low or negative growth, high and variable levels of inflation and currency devaluation. The Brazilian GDP decreased 3.3% in 2016, increased 1.3% in 2017, increased 1.3% in 2018, increased 1.1% in 2019, decreased 4.1% in 2020, and increased 4.6% in 2021. We cannot assure you that GDP will increase or remain stable in the future. Future developments in the Brazilian economy may affect Brazil’s growth rates and, consequently, the consumption of sugar, ethanol, and our other products. As a result, these developments could impair our business strategies, results of operations and financial condition.
The economies of the countries in which we operate may be adversely affected by the deterioration of other global markets.
Financial and securities markets in the countries in which we operate are influenced, to different degrees, by the economic and market conditions in other countries, including other South American and emerging market countries and other
global markets. Investors’ reactions to developments in these other countries, such as the recent developments in the global financial markets, may substantially affect the capital flows into, and the market value of securities of issuers with operations in, the countries in which we operate.
A significant deterioration in the economic growth of any of the main trading partners of Brazil, Argentina or ArgentinaUruguay could have a material impact on the trade balance of those countries and could adversely affect their economic growth and that of other countries in the region. Furthermore, adverse economic conditions in any of these countries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A crisis in global financial markets including other emerging country markets could dampen investor enthusiasm for securities of issuers with South American operations, including our common shares. The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted global financial markets, ushering significant risk and volatility. These effects couldvolatility that may adversely affect the market price for our common shares, as well as make it difficult for us to access capital markets and obtain financing for our operations in the future on(on acceptable terms or underat all).
Although economic conditions vary from country to country, investor reactions to events occurring in one country sometimes demonstrate a “contagion” effect in which an entire region or class of investment is disfavored by international investors. Furthermore, weak, flat or negative economic growth in any conditions.of Brazil’s or Argentina’s major trading partners, including each other, could adversely affect their balance of payments and, consequently, its economic growth.
The Argentine and Brazilian economies may also be affected by conditions in developed economies, such as the United States, that are significant trading partners of Brazil or Argentina or have influence over global economic cycles and over short-term evolution of commodity prices. If interest rates increase significantly in developed economies, including the United States, Argentina and its developing economy trading partners, such as Brazil, could find it more difficult and expensive to borrow capital and refinance existing debt, which could adversely affect economic growth in those countries. Decreased growth from Argentina’s trading partners could have a material adverse effect on the markets for Argentina’s exports and, in turn, adversely affect economic growth. Any of these potential risks to the Argentine economy could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, Brazil and Argentina are highly dependent on the export of certain commodities, such as soy, which has made the Brazilian and Argentine economies more vulnerable to fluctuations in commodity prices. If international commodity prices decline, the Brazilian or Argentine economies could be adversely affected. In addition, adverse weather conditions can affect the production of commodities by the agricultural sector, which account for a significant portion of Brazil’s and Argentina's export revenues. All these circumstances could have a negative impact on the levels of government revenues, available foreign exchange and the government's ability to service its sovereign debt, and could either generate recessionary or inflationary pressures, depending on the government's reaction. Either of these results would adversely impact Brazil’s or Argentina's economic growth and, therefore, our financial condition and results of operations.
Governments have a high degree of influence in the economies in which we operate, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Governments in many of the markets in which we currently operate, or that we may operate in the future, frequently intervene in their respective economies and occasionally make significant changes in monetary, credit, industry and other policies and regulations. Governmental actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limitations on imports. We have no control over, and cannot predict what measures or policies governments may take in the future. Our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policy or regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate that impact different factors such as:
•labor laws and wage increases;
•changes in governmental economic or tax policies, and their effect on economic growth;
•abrupt currency fluctuations;
•high levels of inflation;inflation and the measures taken to combat it, such as price controls or price-fixing regulations;
•exchange and capital control policies;
high•significant variation in interest rates;
•the lack of liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;
•inconsistent fiscal and monetary policy;policies;
•liquidity and solvency of thetheir respective financial system;systems;
•restrictions on land acquisition or use or agricultural commodity production, including limitations on ownership of rural land by foreigners;foreign persons or entities;
•developments in trade negotiations through the World Trade Organization or other international organizations;organizations, including as a result of import/export restrictions or other laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment;
•environmental regulations;
•tax laws, including royalties and the effect of tax laws on distributions from our subsidiaries;
changes in governmental economic or tax policies;
•restrictions on the repatriation of investments and on the transfer of funds abroad;
•expropriations or nationalizations;
import/export restrictions or other laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment;
increase in•increased public expenses affecting the economy and fiscal deficits;deficits; and
price controls or price fixing regulations;
restrictions on land acquisition or use or agricultural commodity production; and
•other political, social and economic developments, including political, social or economic instability, in or affecting the country where each business is based.
Uncertainty over whether governments will implement changes in policy or regulation affecting these or other factors in the future may contribute to economic uncertainty and heightened volatility in the securities markets, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
For instance, the Argentine government has in the past exercised substantial control over the Argentine economy by setting certain industry market conditions and prices, a trend which has continued since Mr. Alberto Fernández took office as president in December 2019. The Social Solidarity Law, enacted in December 2019, froze electricity and natural gas tariff rates until December 31, 2020 and instructed the relevant regulatory agencies to pursue a mandatory renegotiation of those rates, which is currently in process. On January 7, 2020, the government relaunched a voluntary price control to foster consumption and establish reference prices for household products. Initially, 310 products were included in this program and public officials stated that the prices of the products included within the program were to be reduced by 8% on the average (including two of the milk products we sell). Violation of price control measures may result in sanctions, including fines, which amount will be considered on a case-by-case basis at the time of issuing the relevant sanction by the enforcement authority. On April 4, 2020, the Argentine government issued Decree No. 351/2020, which authorized the intervention by local authorities to control maximum prices, which has resulted in the need to allocate additional economic and human resources for our Argentine subsidiaries to comply with governmental requirements and filings pursuant to these regulations. Additionally, the Argentine Government created an informative regime for the purpose of publishing standard maximum prices of a basic listing of consumer products for each province, and a public and free mechanism that allows the filing of claims and complaints by consumers and those included in the production, distribution and commercialization chain of the products included in the obligation to sell at maximum prices. This regulation impacted our processed rice and fluid milk products. Our facilities have been inspected to control compliance with this regulation. As long as this regulation is in place, we are restricted in our ability to increase prices for processed rice and fluid milk products. In addition, the Argentine Supermarkets’ Shelves Law, enacted on March 17, 2020, as implemented by Decree No. 991/2020, is applicable to our products. The purposes of this law are to ensure that the price of certain products remains clear and competitive for the benefit of consumers, to maintain harmony and balance between economic operators, to expand the supply of artisanal, regional and national products produced by micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, and to promote the offer of products manufactured by small producers. Although the law is targeted at supermarkets, it can impact our sales strategies, as it has resulted in the Argentine government imposing additional regulations on our Argentine subsidiaries, often generating further marketing and distribution costs for the purposes of complying with these regulations.
As of the date of this annual report, we cannot assure you whether the Argentine government will enact price control regulations. Interventions by the Argentine government similar to those described above can have an adverse impact on the level of foreign investment in Argentina, the access of Argentine companies to the international capital markets and Argentina's commercial and diplomatic relations with other countries and, consequently, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In the future, the degree of governmental intervention in the economy may continue to rise, which may adversely affect the Argentine economy and, in turn, our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Moreover, historically, the Brazilian government has frequently intervened in the Brazilian economy and has occasionally made significant changes in economic policies and regulations, including, among others, the imposition of a tax on foreign capital entering Brazil, changes in monetary, fiscal and tax policies, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits
on imports. The administration is currently facing domestic pressure to retreat from the current macroeconomic policies in an attempt to achieve higher rates of economic growth. In addition, the Brazilian government has discussed the creation of a tax on financial transactions, including wire transfers, in order to improve the fiscal situation of the country or to increase taxation. We cannot predict which policies will be adopted by the Brazilian government and whether these policies will negatively affect the economy or our business or financial performance.
Currency exchange rate fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar in the countries in which we operate our businesses may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
We operate exclusively outside the United States, and ourOur businesses may be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations results from the currency translation adjustments required in connection with the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. The currency exchange exposure stems from the generation of revenues and the incurrence of expenses in different currencies and the devaluation of local currency revenues impairing the value of investments in U.S. Dollars.dollars. While the Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein are, and our future Consolidated Financial Statements will be, presented in U.S. dollars, the financial statements of our subsidiaries are prepared using the local currency as the functional currency and translated into U.S. dollars by applying: (i) a year-end exchange rate for assets and liabilities; and (ii) an average exchange rate for the year for income and expenses. Resulting exchange differences arising from the translation to our presentation currency are recognized as a separate component of equity. Currencies in Argentina and Brazil have fluctuated significantly against the U.S. dollar in the past. Accordingly, fluctuations in exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar could impair the comparability of our results from period to period and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Argentina has a history of high volatility in its foreign exchange markets, including sharp and unanticipated devaluations, tight foreign exchange controls and severe restrictions on foreign trade. The devaluation of the peso may have a negative impact on the ability of certain Argentine businesses to service their foreign currency denominated debt. It could also lead to higher inflation rates, significantly reduce real wages and jeopardize our business. The Argentine Pesopeso depreciated 52.5%58.9% against the U.S. dollar in 2015, 21.9%2019, 40.5% in 2016, 17.4%2020 and 22.1% in 2017, 102.1% in 2018 and 58.9% in 2019,2021, based on the official exchange rates published by the Argentine Central Bank (Banco Central de la República Argentina - BCRA).Argentina), or the “BCRA.” In addition, during the first quarter of 2022, the peso depreciated approximately 8.1% against the U.S. dollar. In the past, years, the Argentine government has imposed restrictions on the purchase of foreign currency, (see “—Risks Related to Argentina—Exchange controls could restrict the inflow and outflow of funds in Argentina.”) which measures gave rise to an unofficial market where the U.S. dollar traded at a different market value than reflected in the official Argentine Peso – U.S. Dollarpeso-U.S. dollar exchange rate. Due to theIn September 2019, following a foreign exchange crisis generated in August 2019 and the continued reduction of the Argentine Central Bank’sBCRA’s foreign currency reserves, since September 1, 2019 the Argentine government reinstated rigid exchange controls and transfer restrictions, substantially limiting the ability to obtain foreign currency or make certain payments or distributions out of Argentina (see “— Risks Related to Argentina — Argentina. See “—Exchange controls restrict the inflow and outflow of funds in Argentina and may substantially limit the ability of companies to retain or obtain foreign currency or make payments abroad”).abroad.”
The Brazilian currency has also historically suffered frequent fluctuations. As a consequenceresult of inflationary pressures, in the past, the Brazilian government has implemented various economic plans and adopted a number of exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini-devaluations during which the frequency of adjustments has ranged from daily to monthly, floating exchange rate systems, exchange controls and dual exchange rate markets. Formally, the value of the Realreal against foreign currencies is determined under a free-floating exchange rate regime, but, in factpractice, the Brazilian government is currently interveningintervenes in the market,markets through currency swaps and trading in the spot market, among other measures, every time the currency exchange rate is above or below the levels that the Brazilian government considers appropriate, taking into account inflation, growth, the performance of the Realreal against the U.SU.S. dollar in comparison with other currencies, and other economic factors. Periodically, there are significant fluctuations in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar. The Realreal depreciated 46.2%47.0% against the U.S. dollar in 2015, appreciated 16.8% in 2016, appreciatedand depreciated 1.5%, 17.1%, 4.0%, 28.9% and 7.4% in each of 2017, in 2018, the Real appreciated 17.1% against U.S. dollar, depreciated by 17.1% in 20182019, 2020 and by 4.02% in 2019.2021, respectively.
Future fluctuations in the value of the local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar in the countries in which we operate may adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition could be adversely affected.condition.
Inflation in some of the countries in which we operate, along with governmental measures to curb inflation, may have a significant negative effect on the economies of those countries and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations.
In the past, some of the countries in which we operate, particularly Argentina and Brazil, have experienced, or are currently experiencing, high rates of inflation, adversely affecting their economies and financial markets, and limiting the ability of their governments to create conditions that stimulate or maintain economic growth. Although inflation rates in some
of these countries (other than Argentina, as further explained in “-Risks Related to Argentina-Our results of operations may be adversely affected by high and possibly increasing inflation in Argentina”) have been relatively lowcurtailed in the recent past, we cannot assure you that this trend will continue. The measuresMeasures taken by the governments of these countries to control inflation have often included maintaining a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting the availability of credit and retardingimpairing economic growth. Measures to combat inflation and public speculation about possible additional actions have also contributed significantly to economic uncertainty in many of these countries and to heightened volatility in their securities markets. Periods of higher inflation may also slow the growth rate of local economies. Inflation is also likely to increase some of our costs and expenses, whichand we may not be able to fully pass such increases on to our clients, which could adversely affect our operating margins and operating income.
A For instance, a portion of our operating costs in Argentina are denominated in Argentine Pesospesos and most of our operating costs in Brazil are denominated in Brazilian Reais.reais. Inflation in Argentina or Brazil, without a corresponding Pesopeso or Realreal devaluation, could result in an increase in our operating costs without a commensurate increase in our revenues, which could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to pay our foreign currency denominated obligations.
Historically, inflation has materially undermined the Argentine economy and the government’s ability to create conditions that would permit long-term and stable growth. In recent years, Argentina has experienced high inflation rates. High inflation may also undermine Argentina’s foreign competitiveness in international markets and adversely affect economic activity and employment, as well as our business and results of operations. In particular, the profit margin on our services is impacted by the increase in our costs in providing those services, which is influenced by wage inflation in Argentina, as well as other factors. Since 2008, the Argentine economy has been subject to strong inflationary pressures which, according to private sector analysts, reached an average annual rate of 28.2% between 2010 and 2015. In 2007, INDEC was subject to a process of institutional and methodological reforms that led to controversies regarding the credibility of the information published by it, including the Consumer Price Index, or the “CPI.” On January 7, 2016, the Argentine Statistics and Census Agency (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos - “INDEC”)INDEC ceased publishing certain statistical data and, after implementing methodological reforms, resumed publications of the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”)CPI on June 16, 2016, which reached2016. The CPI tallied annual rates of 40.9% at53.8% in 2019, 36.1% in 2020, and 50.9% in 2021. If the endArgentine government continues to fail to address Argentina’s structural inflationary imbalance, the current levels of the fiscal year 2016, 24,8% at the end of the fiscal year 2017, 47.6% at the end of fiscal year 2018 and 53.8% at the end of fiscal year 2019 (see “— Risks Relatedinflation may continue to Argentina-The credibility of several Argentine economic indices have been called into question,rise, which may lead to a lack of confidencehave an adverse effect on Argentina’s economy.
Brazil, in the Argentine economy and may in turn, limit our ability to access the credit and capital markets” and “—Risks Related to Argentina— Our results of operations may be adversely affected by high and possibly increasing inflation in Argentina”).
Brazil has historically experienced high rates of inflation. Inflation, as well as government efforts to curb inflation, hashave had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy, particularly prior to 1995. Inflation rates were 11.3% in 2010, 5.1% in 2011, 7.8% in 2012, 5.5% in 2013, 3.7% in 2014, 10.5% in 2015, andwas 7.2% in 2016, as measured by the General Market Price Index (Indice(Índice Geral de Preços -– Mercado), compiled by the Getulio Vargas Foundation (Fundação Getúlio Vargas). However, in 2017 Brazil registered a deflation of 0.53% due to a decrease in the price of food products. In 2018 Brazil then registered an inflation of 7.5%, in 2018 and 7.3% in 2019 due(due to the depreciation of the Brazilian Realreal against the U.S. dollar and the increase of thein prices of primary products.products), and 23.1% in 2020 and 17.8% in 2021 (due to COVID-19, the depreciation of the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar and the increase in prices of primary products). A significant proportion of our cash costs and our operating expenses are denominated in Brazilian Reaisreais and tend to increase with Brazilian inflation.
The Brazilian government’s measures to control inflation have in the past included and currently include maintaining a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting the availability of credit and reducing economic growth. This policy has changed in the last two years,was abated between 2016 and January 2021, when the Special System for Settlement and Custody rate (Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia), or the “SELIC” rate (the base Brazilian governmentinterest rate), which is set by the Monetary Policy Council (Comitê de Política Monetária), or the “COPOM,” was decreased the interest rate by 775 basis points.from 14.25% to 2.00%. Subsequently, the highincreased inflation arising from the lower interest rate, and the intention to maintain this rate at low levels,abate inflation rates led the Brazilian government to adopt other measures to control inflation, such as tax relief for several sectors of the economy and tax cuts for the products included in the basic food basket. These measures were not sufficient to control the inflation, which led the Brazilian government to reinstate a tighter monetary policy. As a result, interest rates have fluctuated significantly. The Special System for Settlement and Custody (Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia, or “SELIC”) interestyear-end SELIC rate in Brazil at year-end was 13.25% in 2006, 11.25% in 2007, 13.75% in 2008, 8.75% in 2009, 10.75% in 2010, 11.0% in 2011, 7.25% in 2012, 10.0% in 2013, 11.75% in 2014, 14.25% in 2015, 13.75% in 2016, 7%7.00% in 2017, 6.5%6.50% in 2018, and 4.5%4.50% in 2019, as determined by2.00% in 2020, and 9.25% in 2021. As of the Comitê de Política Monetária, or COPOM.date of this annual report, the SELIC rate is set at 11.75%
Argentina and/or Brazil may experience highhigher levels of inflation in the future, which may impact domestic demand for our products. Inflationary pressures may also weaken investor confidence in Argentina and/or Brazil, curtail our ability to access foreign financial markets and lead to further government intervention in the economy, including interest rate increases, restrictions on tariff adjustments to offset inflation, intervention in foreign exchange markets, and actions to adjust or fix currency values, which may trigger or exacerbate increases in inflation, and consequently have an adverse impact on us. In an inflationary environment, the value of uncollected accounts receivable, as well as of unpaid accounts payable, declines rapidly. If the countries in which we operate experience high levels of inflation in the future and price controls are imposed, we may not be able to adjust the rates we charge our customers to fully offset the impact of inflation on our cost structures, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Despite the positive effects the depreciation of the Argentine peso may have on the competitiveness of certain sectors of the Argentine economy, including our business, it also had a negative impact on the financial condition of many Argentine businesses and individuals. The devaluation of the Argentine peso affected or may affect the ability of certain Argentine businesses to honor their foreign currency-denominated debt, generates high levels of inflation, reduces real wages
significantly, and has a negative impact on companies oriented to the domestic market, such as public services and the financial industry. Additional volatility, appreciation or depreciation of the peso, or reduction in the BCRA’s international reserves due to currency interventions could adversely affect the Argentine economy, which, in turn, may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Inflation has also contributed to a material increase in our costs of operation, in particular labor costs; it also enables a reduction in the purchasing power of the population, thus increasing the risk of a lower level of consumption from our customers in Argentina, which could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. Inflation rates could continue to grow in the future, and there is uncertainty regarding the effects that any measures adopted by the government could have to control inflation.
Inflation can also lead to an increase in Argentina's debt and have an adverse effect on Argentina's ability to service its debt, mainly in the medium and long term when most inflation-indexed debt matures. In addition, weaker fiscal results could have a material adverse effect on the Argentine government's ability to access long-term financing, which, in turn, could adversely affect Argentina's economy and financial condition and access to international or domestic capital markets. If the measures adopted by the Argentine government are not able to resolve the structural inflationary disruptions of Argentina, the current inflationary levels could rise and have a negative impact on the economic and financial conditions of Argentina, and, as such, adversely affect our operations and financial condition.
Depreciation of the Pesopeso or the Realreal relative to the U.S. Dollardollar or the Euroeuro may also create additional inflationary pressures in Argentina or Brazil that may negatively affect us. Depreciation generally curtails access to foreign financial markets and may prompt government intervention, including recessionary governmental policies. Depreciation also reduces the U.S. Dollardollar or Euroeuro value of dividends and other distributions on our common shares and the U.S. Dollardollar or Euroeuro equivalent of the market price of our common shares. Any of the foregoing might adversely affect our business, operating results and cash flow, as well as the market price of our common shares.
Conversely, in the short term, a significant increase in the value of the Pesopeso or the Realreal against the U.S. Dollardollar would adversely affect the respective Argentine and/or Brazilian government’s income from exports. This could have a negative effect on gross domestic product, (“GDP”)or “GDP” growth and employment, and could also reduce the public sector’s revenues in those countries by reducing tax collection in real terms, as a portion of public sector revenues are derived from the collection of export taxes.
Disruption of transportation and logistics services, insufficient investment in public infrastructure or disruption to any aspect of the supply chain could adversely affect our operating results.
One of the main disadvantages of the agricultural sector in the countries in which we operate is that key growing regions lie far from major ports. As a result, efficient access to transportation infrastructure and ports is critical to the growth of agriculture
as a whole in the countries in which we operate and of our operations in particular. Improvements in transportation infrastructure are likely to be required to make more agricultural production accessible to export terminals at competitive prices. A substantial portion of agricultural production in the countries in which we operate is currently transported by truck, a means of transportation significantly more expensive than the railrailroad transportation available to U.S. and other international producers. Our dependence on truck transportation may affect our position as a low-cost producer so that our ability to compete in the world markets may be impaired.
Substantial investments are required for road and rail improvement projects, which may not be completed on a timely basis, if at all. Any delay or failure in developing infrastructure systems could reduce the demand for our products, impede our products’ delivery or impose additional costs on us. We currently outsource the transportation and logistics services necessary to operate our business. Any disruption in these services could result in supply problems at our farms and processing facilities and impair our ability to deliver our products to our customers in a timely manner.
In Brazil, a strike held by truckers in May 2018 resulted in a complete stop ofcompletely halted road transportation throughout the country. As a consequence,result, the Brazilian government issued Provisional Measure No. 832 andcaused the enactment of Law No. 13,703/2018, which established a Minimum Pricebase price for Road Freight Transport Policyroad freight transportation and createdthe "Freight Table",created a freight table, in which minimum and mandatory transportation cost values are set each six months by the AgêBrazilian Land Transportation Agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres - ANTT (National Land Transport Agency). WithTerrestres), or the creation of the Freight Table,“ANTT.” These measures adversely affected many companies in the agribusiness sector were adversely affected by the increase inthrough increased transportation costs. Moreover, Minister Luiz Fux of the Federal Supreme Court of Brazil recently suspended all lawsuits that contest the legality of the referred policy, which creates legal uncertainty regarding the application of the Freight Table. As long as there is no definition by the Supreme Court,
In addition, we are subject to the risk of incurring in higher road transportation costs, which could significantly affect the costs of our Brazilian operation.
We are exposed to the risk of disruption to any aspect of theour supply chain, to suppliers’ operations or to distribution channels, and the deterioration in the financial condition of a trading partner. These may be caused by a cyber event,cyber-event, global health crisis, major fire, violent weather conditions or other natural disasters that affect manufacturing or other facilities of our operating subsidiaries or those of their suppliers and distributors. In certain geographic areas where we operate, insurance coverage may not be obtainable on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Coverage may be subject to limitations or we may be unable to recover damages from its insurers.
Disruption may also be caused by spread of infectious disease (such as COVID-19) or by a deterioration in labor or union relations, disputes or work stoppages or other labor-related developments affecting Adecoagrous or itsour suppliers and distributors (see “— Thedistributors. See “—We may be exposed to risks related to health epidemics, and the COVID-19 pandemic mayin particular, which could adversely affectimpact our ability to operate our business and operating results”).results.”
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our technology infrastructure and information and expose us to processes disruption and liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we depend on technology to carry out our business. We also collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our customers and suppliers, and personally identifiable information of our employees, in our data centers and on our networks. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations. In addition, these systems may require modifications or upgrades as a result of technological changes or growth in our business. Although we take actions to secure our systems and electronic information and have disaster recovery plans in case of incidents that could cause major disruptions to our business, these measures may not be enough. In January 2020, we experienced an invasion by a computer virus that temporarily compromised our network, and a significant number of our servers and personal computers at our corporate offices. Although the cyberattack did not impact our production operations systems or financial and accounting systems, we were required to execute a contingency plan to restore the affected services, and return to a safe and normal network conditions.
Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks, our systems, and eventually suffer from systems disruption and/or having the information stored there accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, disrupt our operations, damage our reputation, and cause over costs to remedy the harm suffered, which could adversely affect our business/operating margins, revenues and competitive position.
Compliance with data protection laws could require changes to certain of our business practices, thereby increasing our costs, and noncompliance with the terms of such laws could adversely affect our business.
We operate in a complex regulatory and legal environment that exposes us to compliance and litigation risks that could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These laws may change, sometimes significantly, as a result of political, economic or social events.
In addition, on August 14, 2018, the Brazilian Federal Law No. 13,709/2018 was enacted, which sets out comprehensive data protection procedures and general principles and obligations that apply across multiple economic sectors and contractual relationships (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados), or the “LGPD.” The LGPD establishes detailed rules for the collection, use, processing and storage of personal data and will affect all economic sectors, including the relationship between customers and suppliers of goods and services, employees and employers and other relationships in which personal data is collected, whether in a digital or physical environment. The obligations established by LGPD will become effective in August 2020, when all legal entities will be required to adapt their data processing activities to these new rules. The data protection regime imposes more stringent data protection standards on Brazilian residents. Any breaches of the LGPD may subject us to penalties and a requirement to notify parties whose data has been affected.
We are currently evaluating the LGPD and its requirements and potential effects on our business. Implementation of the LGPD could require changes to certain of our business practices, thereby increasing our costs, and noncompliance with its terms could adversely affect our business. Moreover, additional data protection laws may be enacted in Brazil or in other jurisdictions in which we operate. Any such additional laws may require us to make additional changes to our business practices and may expose us to additional penalties for non-compliance.
Risks Related to Argentina
The measures taken or to be implemented by the Argentine government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operations
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. This pandemic, as well as the reality or fear of any other adverse public health developments, could adversely and materially affect, among other things, our manufacturing and supply chain operations, including due to the reduction or closure of our production units and the interruption of the supply of raw materials (see “Risks Related to Our Business and Industries-The COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operating results”).
The Argentine government has taken several measures regarding the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. Initially, on March 18, 2020, it extended the public health emergency following the increasing spread in Argentina. On March 20, 2020, the Argentine Government implemented a social, preventive and mandatory isolation regime has been successively extended until May 10, 2020 (and could continue to be extended), prohibiting the circulation of people on routes, roads and public spaces (the “Mandatory Isolation Regime”).
As of the date of this report, the activities pursued by our Argentine subsidiaries, related to agricultural production, distribution and commercialization, were exempted from the Mandatory Isolation Regime. Our Argentine subsidiaries must guarantee the hygiene and safety conditions established by the Ministry of Health to preserve the health of their employees. Furthermore, during the Mandatory Isolation Regime all employees in the private sector shall be entitled to the full enjoyment of their normal income, under the terms to be established by the regulations of the Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security.
Maximum Prices and Supply Obligations
In connection with the declaration of the COVID-19 sanitary emergency, in order to guarantee the regular supply of essential products, on March 20, 2020, the Federal Government issued general regulations (applicable to most producers) imposing a temporary obligation (in principle, during the following 60 days and renewable, if necessary) to those who participate in the production, distribution and commercialization chain of certain products, to (i) sell products to their maximum prices set as of March 6, 2020; and (ii) increase production up to their facilities’ full capacity and provide the proper measures to guarantee their transport and supply, and created (i) an informative regime for the purpose of publishing standard maximum prices of a basic listing of consumer products for each province (which will be available on the website www.preciosmaximos.produccion.gob.ar); and (ii) a public and free mechanism that allows the filing of claims and complaints by consumers and those included in the production, distribution and commercialization chain of the products included in the obligation to sell at maximum prices. This regulation impacted our processed rice and fluid milk products. The facilities of the Company have been inspected to control
compliance of the abovementioned regulation. As long as this regulation is in place, the Company would likely face restrictions to freely implement price increases on the processed rice and fluid milk products.
Those measures (jointly with other announcements that up to the present have not being turned into regulations) suggest that the Federal Government would be planning to enforce the Supply Act broadly to avoid potential shortage on the supply or increase in the prices of products deemed essential.
On April 4, 2020 the Argentine Government issued Decree No. 351/2020, which authorized the intervention of local authorities (both at Provincial and Municipal level) to control maximum prices under the recently adopted regulations and adopted rules to coordinate the enforcement of regulations.
Remote Work
COVID-19 pandemic pressured most companies which were not excluded from the Argentine Isolation Regime to implement measures to guarantee remote work for their employees. Consequently, several liabilities such as cybersecurity, privacy policies, adequate computing devices and professional use of personal computing devices have to be implemented by such companies.
Although as of the date of this report the activities carried out by our Argentines subsidiaries have been excluded from the Argentine Isolation Regime, because it provides as “essential” activities and services related to production, distribution and agricultural commercialization, we cannot assure that this exception will continue to apply to our operations.
The| foregoing measures taken by the Argentine government in response to the COVID 19 virus and any future actions that may implemented are material intrusions and limits on the ability of the Company to operate its businesses and which will adversely impact the price of our products and our operating results.
Argentine economic and political conditions and perceptions of these conditions in the international market may have a direct impact on our business and our access to international capital and debt markets, and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
A significant portion of our operations, property and customers are located in Argentina. Consequently, the value of our assets and properties and the results of our operations depend on the macroeconomics, regulatory, social and political conditions of Argentina and on the exchange rates between the Argentine peso and foreign currency. These conditions include growth rates, inflation rates, exchange rates, taxes, foreign exchange controls, changes in the interest rates, changes of the state policies, social instability and other domestic and international political and economic events affecting Argentina.
The Argentine economy has experienced extreme volatility in the recent decades, with uneven periods of economic growth, periods of high inflation and devaluation of the Argentine Peso against the U.S. dollar. Our business and operations may be affected by the economic and political events that may affect the Argentine economy, such as: price controls, foreign exchange controls, currency devaluations, high interest rates, increase in public expenses, tax increase or other regulatory initiatives.
The credibility of several Argentine economic indices during the Fernández de Kirchner administration (years 2004 through 2015) has been called into question. By previously understating inflation, the INDEC had overstated economic growth in real terms. The adjustments made by the Macri administration to INDEC lead to a determination of real GDP growth of 48.6% for the period of 2004 to 2015, as opposed to 65% growth in real terms for the same period resulting from the information used prior to June 2016. Because of these reforms, on November 9, 2016, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (the “IMF”) lifted its censure on Argentina, noting that Argentina had resumed the publication of data in a manner consistent with its obligations under the Articles of Agreement of the IMF. On June 29, 2017, INDEC also published revised GDP data for the years 2004 through 2015. According to the INDEC, Argentina’s GDP grew by 2.9% in 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. Additionally, according to the INDEC, Argentina’s GDP decreased by 2.5% in 2018 and 1.7% in 2019.
Since the beginning of 2015, international commodity prices for Argentina’s primary commodity exports have declined, which has had an adverse effect on Argentina’s economic growth. A continued decline in the international prices for Argentina’s main commodity exports could have a direct negative effect on our business, results of operation and financial condition, as well as on Argentina’s economy.
On August 11, 2019, presidential and legislative primary elections were held in Argentina, in which Alberto Fernandez and former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner from the “Frente de Todos” (a coalition formed to participate in the general
elections) received 47.65% of the votes while president Mauricio Macri's party obtained 32.08%. On October 27, 2019, Alberto Fernández and Cristina Kirchner, as vice-president, won the presidential elections and took office on December 10, 2019.
After the primary elections, the markets reacted negatively, and the economic conditions continued to deteriorate. Due to, among other things, the rise of inflation, the continued demand for salary increases, the growth of the fiscal deficit, the required payments to be made on public debt, the reduction of industrial growth, the recession and the increase of the capital outflows from Argentina, the Government of former President Macri re-introduced rigid restrictions and foreign exchange controls in September 1, 2019, which among other things, significantly curtailed access to the official foreign exchange market (the “FX Market”) by individuals and entities (see “Additional Information-Exchange Controls”).
During the end of 2019 and early 2020, Social and political tension and high levels of poverty and unemployment persisted industrial activity and consumption diminished considerably. The deterioration of the economy significantly increased the social and political turmoil, including civil unrest, riots, looting, nationwide protests, strikes and street demonstrations. Due to the high levels of inflation and devaluation, employers both in the public and private sectors are experiencing significant pressure from organized labor unions and their employees to further increase salaries (see “— The Argentine government may order salary increases to be paid to employees in the private sector, which would increase our operating costs”).
On December 23, 2019, the Social Solidarity and Productive Reactivation Law No. 27,541 was published in the Official Gazette, which declared the public emergency in economic, financial, fiscal, administrative, social security, tariff, energy, health and social matters. As a result of this measure, the Argentine president and the National Congress have gained considerable powers to alter governmental policies and measures related to the Argentine economy (See “— The impact of the Argentine congressional and presidential elections on the future economic and political environment of Argentina remains uncertain”).
The Argentine government also adopted measures regarding sovereign debt, including a “re-profiling” or restructuring of certain public debt bonds subject to Argentine law (See " —The economy of Argentina may be affected by its government’s limited access to financing from international markets and the result of failure to pay its debt obligations and the current debt restructuring process").obligations.
We cannot now fully estimate the impact that the measures currently adopted by the government, or those that it may implement in the future, will have on the Argentine economy as a whole and on the business, equity and results of our operations.
Continuing inflation, increase of unemployment, decline in GDP, peso depreciation, and/or other future economic, social and political developments in Argentina, over which we have no control, may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
The impact of the Argentine congressional and presidential elections on the future economic and political environment of Argentina remains uncertain.
Since taking office in December 10, 2019, the Alberto Fernández administration (the “Fernández Administration”) announced and implemented the following measures:
Law of Social Solidarity and Productive Reactivation: On December 23, 2019, Law No. 27,541 Social Solidarity and Productive Reactivation was published in the Official Gazette (the “Solidarity Law”). The Solidarity Law declared a public emergency in economic, financial, fiscal, administrative, social security, tariff, energy, health and social matters and granted the Executive Branch with broad powers in many aspects related to the public emergency. The Solidarity Law and related regulations adopted on on December 27, 2019 by Decree No. 99/2019, introduced important foreign exchange restrictions and tax modifications, among other provisions related to sovereign debt, energy and social security. Decree No. 99/2019 provided measures regarding employer contributions, applicable rates for foreign goods and provided that, digital services will be taxed at a 8% , and the acquisition services abroad and passenger transport services destined outside the country at 30%. The Solidarity Law delegated in the Executive powers from Congress to determine the export duty rates of exports of all goods and determines different caps for different products. Most agricultural goods have a cap of 15% export duties rate or less (currently, most of them are set between 5%-12%) except for soybean products which are mostly set at a 33% export duty rate.
Price Control Program: On January 7, 2020, the government relaunched the so-called Programa Precios Cuidados, a voluntary price control program, whose goal is to foster consumption and establish reference prices for households products with the highest consumption.. Initially, 310 products were included within Programa Precios Cuidados and public officials stated that the prices of the products included within the program were to be reduced by 8% on
the average. Two of the milk products commercialized by the Company are covered by the Programa Precios Cuidados.
Maximum prices and supply obligations: In connection with the coronavirus (COVID-19) sanitary emergency, on March 20, 2020, the Federal Government issued general regulations (applicable to most producers) imposing a temporary obligation (in principle, during the following 60 days) to (i) sell products at the maximum prices established as of March 6, 2020; and (ii) increase the production up to the facilities’ full capacity (see “— The measures taken or to be implemented byHistorically, the Argentine government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic mayand provinces have an adverse effectdefaulted on our business and operations — Maximum Prices and Supply Obligations”).
Law of Sustainability of Public Debt issued under Foreign Law: On February 13, 2020, Law No. 27,544 of Sustainability of Public Debt issued under Foreign Law was published in the Official Gazette, granting powers to the Ministry of Economy to carry out the restructuring of the public sovereign debt governed by foreign law. Likewise, the law authorizes the Ministry of Economy to issue new public securities to modify the maturity profile of interest and capital amortizations,payments, which has limited their access, as well as determine terms and procedures for issuance, and appoint institutions orthat of private companies, to the international financial advisors for the restructuring process (see " — The economy of Argentina may be affected by its government’s limited access to financing from international markets, and the result of failure to pay its debt obligations and the current debt restructuring process”).
Tax Reform Law: See “— Changes in the Argentine tax laws may adversely affect the results of our operations, financial condition and cash flows-“.
Supermarket Shelves Law. On March 17, 2020, Supermarkets’ Shelves Law No. 27,545 was published in the Official Gazette. This law provides rules and restrictions for the display of products in certain commercialization centers’ shelves and also provides certain conditions that must be fulfilled in the commercial relationship between the commercialization centers andhas substantially increased their suppliers, including compliance with the good commercial practices’ code which is also created by the law.
Coronavirus measures. The Argentine government has taken and continues taking measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (see “— The measures taken or to be implemented by the Argentine government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operations").
We have no control over the implementation of the reforms to the regulatory framework that governs our operations and cannot guarantee that these reforms will be implemented or, if implemented, that such implementation will benefit our business. The failure of these measures to achieve their intended goals could adversely affect the Argentine economy, which, in turn, may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
This political uncertainty in respect of economic measures could lead to volatility in the market prices of securities of Argentine companies and our common shares, and could have a negative impact in our domestic consumer markets, which, in turn, could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Argentine economy has been adversely affected by economic developments in other markets and by other general "contagion" effects.
Financial and securities markets in Argentina, and also the Argentine economy, are influenced by economic and market conditions in other markets worldwide, including those relating to the recent trade dispute between China and the United States. Although economic conditions vary from country to country, investors' reactions to events occurring in one country sometimes demonstrate a "contagion" effect in which an entire region or class of investment is disfavored by international investors.
Furthermore, weak, flat or negative economic growth in any of Argentina’s major trading partners, such as Brazil, could adversely affect Argentina’s balance of payments and, consequently, its economic growth.
The Argentine economy may also be affected by conditions in developed economies, such as the United States, that are significant trading partners of Argentina or have influence over global economic cycles and over short-term evolution of commodity prices. If interest rates increase significantly in developed economies, including the United States, Argentina and its developing economy trading partners, such as Brazil, could find it more difficult and expensive to borrow capital and refinance existing debt, which could adversely affect economic growth in those countries. Decreased growth from Argentina’s trading partners could have a material adverse effect on the markets for Argentina’s exports and, in turn, adversely affect economic growth. Any of these
potential risks to the Argentine economy could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and result of operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has also destabilized global financial markets, which has had a negative impact on global trade and the global economy, including the Argentine economy, which in turn could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition (See “ — Risks Related to Our Business and Industries —The COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operating results”).
Consequently, there can be no assurance that the Argentine financial system and securities markets will not continue to be adversely affected by events in developed countries' economies or events in other emerging markets, which could in turn, adversely affect the Argentine economy and, indirectly, our business, financial condition and results of operations, and the market value of our securities.
The economy of Argentina may be affected by its government’s limited access torespective financing from international markets and the result of failure to pay its debt obligations and the current debt restructuring process.
costs. The Argentine economy has been experiencing significant instability in the past decades, including devaluations, high inflation, and prolonged periods of reduced economic growth, which have led to payment defaults on Argentina’s foreign debt and multiple downgrades in Argentina’s foreign debt rating with attendant restrictions on Argentina’s ability to obtain financing in the international markets.
Argentina’s 2001 sovereign default and its failure to fully restructure its sovereign debt and negotiate with the holdout creditors has historically limited and may continue to limit Argentina’s ability to access international financing. In 2005, Argentina completed the restructuring of a substantial portion of its indebtedness and settled all of its debt with the IMF. Additionally, in June 2010, Argentina completed the restructuring of a significant portion of the defaulted bonds that were not exchanged in the 2005 restructuring. Holdout bondholders that declined to participate in the restructuring filed lawsuits against Argentina in several countries, including the United States. Since late 2012, rulings from courts in the United States favorable to holdout bondholders aggravated investors’ concerns regarding investment in the country.
In February 2016, the Macri administration entered into settlement agreements with certain holdout bondholders to settle these claims, which were subject to the approval of the Argentine Congress. The Argentine government reached settlement agreements with holders of a significant portion of the defaulted bonds and has repaid the majority of the holdout creditors with the proceeds of a US$16.5 billion international offering of 3-year, 5-year,three-year, five-year, 10-year and 30-year bonds on April 22, 2016. Although the size of theoutstanding claims involved has decreased significantly, litigation initiated by bondholders that havedid not acceptedaccept Argentina’s settlement offer of 2016 continues in several jurisdictions.
Additionally, foreign shareholders of several Argentine companies have filed claims with the ICSIDInternational Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes, or the “ICSID,” alleging that the emergency measures adopted by the Argentine national government since the crisis in 2001 and 2002 differ from the just and equal treatment standards set forth in several bilateral investment treaties to which Argentina is a party. The ICSID has ruled against Argentina with respect to many of these claims.
Litigation involving holdout creditors, claims with ICSID and other claims against the Argentine national government, resulted and may result in material judgments against the government, lead to attachments of, or injunctions relating to, Argentina’s assets, or could cause Argentina to default under its other obligations, and such events may prevent Argentina from obtaining favorable terms or interest rates when accessing international capital markets or from accessing international financing at all. Our ability to obtain U.S. dollar-denominated financing has been adversely impacted by these factors.
During 2017,In June 2018, and 2019, it became increasingly difficult for Argentine companies to obtain financing in U.S. dollars, and loans in local currencies carry significantly higher interest rates.
The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund hasIMF approved a three-year Stand-By Arrangementfinancial support plan for Argentina amounting to US$57.1 billion, following an agreement on an economic plan to be implemented by the Argentine authorities; however, there can be no assurance that such plan will meet its objectives in supporting the Argentine government’s economic priorities, nor are we able to predict what the future consequences will be for the Argentine economy in general or our business in particular.
The Argentine government requested IMF financial support in late May 2018 to help strengthen the Argentine economy considering the financial market turbulence suffered in early 2018. In early June 2018, Argentina and IMF staff reached an agreement
on an economic plan that could be supported by IMF financing in the form of a Stand-By Arrangementstand-by arrangement for $50.0 billion, and on June 20, 2018, the IMF’s Executive Board approved such plan and the consequent three-year Stand-By Arrangement.
On September 2018 the Argentine government negotiated an extension to the Stand-By Arrangement from $50.0 billion to $57.1 billion. As of December 2019, the IMF disbursed an aggregate of US$44.70 billion and as of the date of this annual report there were additional disbursements pending for a total of US$12.40 billion.
The purpose of the Stand-By Arrangement is to support the Argentine government’s economic priorities, which include strengthening the Argentine economy and protecting the living standards of the Argentine citizens. The Fernández Administration announced that it would not request the disbursements of the pending amounts under the Stand-By Arrangement and is negotiating the extension of the repayment terms that mature in 2021 and 2022.
As of the date of this annual report, we cannot guarantee that the Argentine government and the IMF will reach an agreement on the restructuring of the Stand-By Arrangement, nor are we able to predict the future consequences for the Argentine economy in general or our business in particular if such agreement fails.
Pursuant to a report issued by the Secretary of Finance of the Argentine government, as of December 2019, Argentina’s foreign debt amounted to US$311.2550 billion, which represented 91.6% of Argentina’s GDP. In 2020 the Argentine government is requiredwas increased to make payments of about US$52 billion on sovereign debt in U.S. dollars and Argentine pesos, including about US$3757.1 billion in foreign currency; and in 2021 the Argentine government is required to make payments of about US$37.1 billion on sovereign debt in U.S. dollars and Argentine pesos.
In addition, in January 26, 2020 the Province of Buenos Aires, the largest estate in Argentina, also had a maturity of provincial sovereign debt for US$277 million in principal amount and interests that, after the failure of the negotiations for an extension, cancelled within the curing period in February 5, 2020. The Province of Buenos Aires has additional payments under its sovereign debt for US$110 million maturing in May 2020 and US$750 million maturing in June 2020. The Province will seek to restructure its sovereign debt in U.S. dollars simultaneously with the restructuring of the Argentine sovereign debt.
As from late 2019, the Argentine government adopted measures regarding sovereign debt, including a “re-profiling” or restructuring of certain public debt bonds subject to Argentine law. On February 13, 2020, Law No. 27,544 of Sustainability of Public Debt issued under Foreign Law was published in the Official Gazette, granting powers to the Ministry of Economy to carry out the restructuring of the public sovereign debt governed by foreign law.
Given that the Argentine government is facing maturities of sovereign debt in U.S. dollars and Argentine pesos for about US$11 billion during the first quarter of 2020 and US$26 billion during the second quarter of 2020, the Argentine Executive Power publicly announced a timeline with a restructuring deadline of March 31, 2020 in relation to bonds governed by foreign law. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the timeline initially published by the Ministry of Economy for the restructuring of the public external debt which provided, among other steps, the launch of the offer to exchange bonds governed was postponed.
Within the framework of Law No. 27,544, on March 10, 2020, the Argentine Executive published Decree No. 250/2020 in the Official Gazette, which defined the universe of bonds subject to restructuring and provided that the nominal value of USD 68,842,528,826 or its equivalent in other currencies is the maximum amount of the operations of liability management and/or exchanges and/or restructurings of the Argentine public bonds issued under foreign law existing as of February 12, 2020 detailed in the annex of such decree.
On April 6, 2020, Decree No. 346/2020 issued by the Argentine Executive was published in the Official Gazette, providing the deferral of the payments of interest and amortizations of principal, of the sovereign debt bonds denominated in U.S. dollars governed by Argentine Law, until December 31, 2020, or until any previous date to be determined by the Ministry of Economy, considering the level of progress and execution of the process for the restoration of the sustainability of the public debt.
On April 17, 2020, the Argentine government announced the exchange offer with respect to sovereign debt governed by foreign law, which was then approved on April 21, 2020, by means of Decree No. 391/2020.Such Decree provides the restructuring of USD and EUR denominated bonds issued under foreign law and invites to exchange them for new bonds, under the terms and conditions set by the offering documents. The maximum amount of the issuance for the aggregate series of the new bonds denominated in U$S shall not be superior to nominal value U$S 44,500,000,000; and for the new bonds denominated in EUR it shall not be superior to nominal value EUR 17,600,000,000. The offering documents for the exchange offer were filed within the SEC and the bondholders will have until May 8, 2020 (in principle, given that this term could be extended by the Argentine government), to accept the offer.
The terms and conditions of sovereign debt bonds governed by foreign law which are eligible for the exchange have collective action clauses pursuant to which their restructuring requires the consent of certain majorities of holders, according to its own terms and conditions. There has been reported the existence of holders’ committees holding blocking positions in some or all the bonds to be restructured.
September 2018. As of the date of this annual report, the debt restructuring process is being carried outIMF disbursed an aggregate of US$44.7 billion under this arrangement. The Argentine government negotiated an extension with the IMF for repayments under the stand-by arrangement that matured in 2022. In March 2022, the IMF and the Argentine government reached an understanding, and the final agreement was approved by the Argentine Congress on March 17, 2022 and by the IMF’s executive board on March 25, 2022. The Argentine government butannounced that it will also engage in negotiations with the Paris Club for the restructuring of the debt incurred with such institution given that there are also payments becoming due in the following months.
Moreover, during 2020 the Argentine government restructured its results are still uncertain. Without accesspublic debt in bonds denominated in foreign currency governed by foreign law as well as bonds denominated in foreign currency governed by Argentine law, by means of debt restructuring procedures implemented internationally and locally, respectively, within each group of creditors according to international private financing, Argentina may not be able to finance its obligations, and financing from multilateral financial institutions may be limited or not available. This could also inhibit the abilitytype of sovereign debt. On February 12, 2020, the Argentine Congress approved the restructuring of the Argentine Central Bankexternal public debt. Through Decree No. 250/2020, the Argentine administration authorized negotiations for the restructuring of US$68.9 billion of sovereign bonds issued in foreign currency and governed by foreign law. On April 17, 2020, Argentina announced an invitation to adopt measures to curb inflationexchange its sovereign bonds governed by foreign law that were eligible for the restructuring for new bonds. After several extensions and could adversely affect Argentina’s economic growth and public finances, which could, in turn, adversely affect our operations inimprovements made within the initial offer, on August 31, 2020, Argentina our financial condition orannounced the results of our operations.
Duethe invitation to Argentina’s payment obligations andexchange. Argentina obtained the lack ofmajorities required under the Argentine government’s access to additional international, multilateral or private financing, as of the date of this report, the country risk index published by JP Morgan has increased significantly, which represents a high uncertainty on the ability of the Argentine government to make the payments due under its sovereign debt in the short and medium term.
If the Argentine government does not restructure the sovereign bonds with most holders (according to the terms of the relevant collective action clauses to
exchange 99.01% of the eligible bonds, as a result of obtaining a level of acceptance of 93.55% of the bondholders to its exchange proposal launched in April and improved in July and in August, after the agreement with three groups of bondholders. Within the context of the agreement with the groups of bondholders for the exchange offer) Argentina may default on itsrestructuring of sovereign debt again.governed by foreign law, Argentina also conducted a local exchange. Argentina launched an offer to exchange sovereign bonds denominated in U.S. dollars and “dollar-linked” issued under local law. The instruments subject to the local debt restructuring were affected by the deferral of payments of principal and interest until December 31, 2020, provided by Presidential Decree No. 346/20. In such event, Argentina's abilityAugust 2020, Argentina launched an offer to obtain international or multilateral private financing or direct foreign investmentexchange this universe of sovereign bonds denominated in U.S. dollars and ‘dollar-linked’ issued under Argentine law. As a result of this transaction, 99.4% of the bondholders of eligible instruments under this local exchange had accepted the offer. Resolution No. 540/2020 further provided the procedure to allow eligible instruments which did not enter into the debt restructuring under Argentine law carried out in August and September 2020 to be tendered. The resolution provided that holders who were unable to enter the exchange within the prior invitation term may do so in successive acceptance terms which will be limited, which may in turn impair its ability to implement reforms and public policies to foster economic growth, impair the ability of private sector entities to access the international capital markets or make the terms of such financing much less favorable that those accessible by companies in other countriesextended until July 28, 2021 in the region and may accelerate the depreciation of the Argentine peso, foster inflation and deepen the economic crisis and recession. In addition, Argentina may face again litigation from sovereign debt holdout holders.conditions set forth therein.
Argentina’s ability to obtain international or multilateral private financing or direct foreign investment may be limited, which may in turn impair its ability to implement reforms and public policies to foster economic growth. In addition, Argentina’s ongoing litigation with the remaining holdout creditors as well as ICSID and other claims against the Argentine national government, or any future defaults of its financial obligations, may prevent us from accessing the international capital markets or cause the terms of any such transactions less favorable than those provided to companies in other countries in the region, potentially impacting our financial condition. Lack of access to international or domestic financial markets could affect the projected capital expenditures for our operations in Argentina, which, in turn, may have an adverse effect on our financial condition or the results of our operations.
Argentina’s current account and balance of payment imbalances could lead to a depreciation of the Argentine peso, and as a result, affect our results of operations, our capital expenditure program and our ability to service our foreign currency liabilities.
According to INDEC,In the past, Argentina has a structural current accounthad severe macroeconomic imbalances, including frequent and extreme fiscal deficits. Since 1961, the Argentine government has had yearly fiscal deficits approximately 90% of the time, resulting in highly vulnerable macroeconomic conditions. The Argentine government has financed its fiscal deficit that reached US$3.5 billionmainly in two ways: (i) by the end of 2019, and reached US$27.3 billion in 2018, US$31.6 billion in 2017, US$15.1 billion in 2016 and US$17.6 billion in 2015, representing 5.3%, 4.9%, 2.7% and 3.0% of GDP 2018-2015, respectively.
The current account deficit was financed in recent years withrelying on external debt issuances, which has historically led to rapid increases in public debt levels; and (ii) by having the international debt markets by the Macri administration. AccordingBCRA issue currency, which has led to the INDEC statistics, net external debt issued by Argentina consistedhigh inflation and, in certain cases, hyperinflation. The fiscal deficit reached 4.9% of approximately US$277.6 billion, US$277.9 billion and US$234.5 billionGDP in 2019, 20188.5% of GDP in 2020, and 2017, respectively.4.5% of GDP in 2021. Failure to reduce fiscal deficits could lead to growing levels of uncertainty regarding Argentina’s macroeconomic conditions. In addition, the settlementparticular, it could lead to growing inflation rates and unanticipated foreign exchange depreciation and balance of the disputespayments crisis, higher local vulnerability to international credit crisis or geopolitical shocks, higher interest rates and erratic monetary policies, a reduction in real salaries and as a consequence, in private consumption, and a reduction in growth rates. This level of uncertainty, over the 2001 defaulted debt crisis has allowed several provinceswhich we have no control, may adversely affect our financial condition or results of Argentina and certain Argentine private companies to issue new debt securities in foreign markets. This has contributed to offset the current account deficit and has allowed the Argentine Central Bank to accumulate international reserves of US$10.8 billion and US$15.8 billion in 2018 and 2017, respectively. However, in 2019, the Argentine Central Bank’s international reserves were reduced by US$21.0 billion. Given that the Argentine Central Bank’s freely available reserves may be used to settle debts denominated in foreign currency up to a certain maximum amount, as provided by the Solidarity Law, the Argentine Central Bank’s reserves could continue to decrease.operations.
Because foreign direct investment remains stagnant in Argentina, amounting to only US$22.9 billion, US$23.7 billion and US$23.8 billion in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, it may become impossible for Argentina and its provinces to meet their debtsdebt obligations in the future, since Argentina’s foreign currency needs would severely overcome its foreign currency sources. If this level of uncertainty prevails on international investors, Argentina may suffer a “sudden stop” event, where investors stop lending money to Argentinean institutions. This, in turn, may result in large capital outflows that could not only force the Argentine government to default on its debt, but also generate a rapid and unanticipated depreciation of the argentine peso, a hike in local interest rates and a probable banking system crisis if bank deposits are largely withdrawn following social unrest.
The impact that the measures taken by the present administration will have on the Argentine economy as a whole cannot be predicted. As of the date of this report, the results of the measures already implemented and the government’s measures related to the outbreak of COVID-19, are unknown. On February 12, 2020, the Minister of Economy, Martín Guzmán, stated that a reduction in the primary fiscal deficit in 2020 is neither realistic nor sustainable. Alberto Fernández's government measures aim to stabilize state accounts, but in principle they intend to maintain expansive policies that would mean initially even more increases in public spending. The economy minister said he would aim to reach fiscal balance by the end of the term of current president Alberto Fernández in 2023.
The failure to reduce fiscal deficits could increase the level of uncertainty regarding the macroeconomic conditions in Argentina. In particular, it could lead to an increase in the inflation index, devaluation of the Argentine peso with respect to foreign currencies and a subsequent crisis in the balance of payments, greater local vulnerability to the international credit crisis or geopolitical shocks, rising rates of interest, erratic monetary policies, reduction in real wages and, as a consequence, in private consumption and reduction in growth rates. This level of uncertainty, over which we have no control, can affect our financial condition or the results of operations.
If a balance of payments crisis were to occur, a large depreciation of the Argentine peso against the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our ability to meet our foreign currency obligations. Furthermore, the negative effect such a crisis could have on the growth rates of the Argentine economy and its consumption patterns could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and result of operations.
If current levels of fiscal deficits are not reduced, the Argentine economy could be adversely affected, negatively impacting our business and results of operations.
Between 2007 and 2015, Fernández de Kirchner's administration significantly increased public spending. In the eleven-month period ended on November 30, 2015, the fiscal deficit increased by 363% annualized. During that period, the Fernández de Kirchner administration turned to the Argentine Central Bank and the National Social Security Administration (Administración Nacional de la Seguridad Social or “ANSES” after its Spanish acronym), to finance part of the public spending. Inflation continues to be a challenge for Argentina given its persistent nature in recent years. The Macri administration had announced its intention to reduce the primary fiscal deficit as a percentage of GDP over time and reduce the government's dependence on Argentine Central Bank financing. Given the difficulties of the Argentine public finances, the administration of former President Macri adopted several measures to finance public spending, for example, the revision of subsidy policies (in particular those related to tariffs on energy, electricity and gas, water and public transport) and the implementation of an expansive monetary policy. These measures resulted in a further increase in prices and, therefore, adversely affected, consumer purchasing power and the overall economic activity. In addition , measures recently announced by the administration of President Alberto Fernández, the implementation of the Solidarity Law (See “— The impact of the Argentine congressional and presidential elections on the future economic and political environment of Argentina remains uncertain”) as well as the measures related to the outbreak of COVID-19 will have an impact on the Argentine economy (See “— The measures taken or to be implemented by the Argentine government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause adverse effect on our business and operations”).
Accordingly, Argentina has had severe macroeconomic imbalances, including frequent and extreme fiscal deficits. Since 1961, the national government has had year-end fiscal deficits in approximately 90% of the years (47 years out of 53 years), resulting in highly vulnerable macroeconomic conditions. The Argentine government has financed its fiscal deficit in two main ways: (i) by relying on external debt issuances, which has historically led to rapid increases in public debt levels; and (ii) by having the Argentine Central Bank issue new currency notes, which has led to high inflation periods and, in certain cases, hyperinflation.
The Macri administration took office in December 2015 and inherited a rising fiscal deficit that reached 5.2% of GDP in 2015, 5.8% of GDP in 2016, 6.0% of GDP in 2017, 5.2% for 2018, and 3.8% for 2019. Although the primary deficit seemed to have decreased by 2019, the financial deficit was still significant due to the lack of adoption of structural changes to reduce government’s spending, increase of inflation and the deficit of the balance of payment among others. The Fernández administration has announced that a reduction of the fiscal deficit under the current conditions of the economy is not sustainable and their aim would be to reach fiscal balance 2023 (See “—Argentina’s current account and balance of payment imbalances could lead to a depreciation of the Argentine peso, and as a result, affect our results of operations, our capital expenditure program and our ability to service our foreign currency liabilities”).
The failure to reduce fiscal deficits could lead to growing levels of uncertainty regarding Argentina’s macroeconomic conditions. In particular, it could lead to growing inflation rates and unanticipated foreign exchange depreciation and balance of payments crisis, higher local vulnerability to international credit crisis or geopolitical shocks, higher interest rates and erratic monetary policies, a reduction in real salaries and as a consequence, in private consumption, and a reduction in growth rates. This level of uncertainty, over which we have no control, may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Our results of operations may be adversely affected by high and possibly increasing inflation in Argentina.
Historically, inflation has materially undermined the Argentine economy and the government’s ability to create conditions that would permit long term and stable growth. In recent years, Argentina has experienced high inflation rates. High inflation may also undermine Argentina’s foreign competitiveness in international markets and adversely affect economic activity and employment, as well as our business and results of operation. In particular, the profit margin on our services is impacted by the increase in our costs in providing those services, which is influenced by wage inflation in Argentina, as well as other factors.
Since 2008, the Argentine economy has been subject to strong inflationary pressures. Given INDEC’s institutional and methodological reforms, controversy has arisen regarding the reliability of the information produced since 2007, including inflation estimates(see “ — The credibility of several Argentine economic indices have been called into question, which may lead to a lack of confidence in the Argentine economy and may in turn limit our ability to access the credit and capital markets” and “— Risks Related to Our Business and Industries-Inflation in some of the countries in which we operate, along with governmental measures to curb inflation, may have a significant negative effect on the economies of those countries and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations”).
Due to several internal and external factors, including, but not limited to, the raising of the interest rate by the US Federal Reserve, the inability of the Argentine government to implement all required structural changes to reduce the fiscal deficit, the increasing need of international financing to finance the fiscal deficit, the increase of the government’s inflation targets, the peso suffered a new sharp depreciation, which, as of December 31, 2018 accumulated 102.2%, and this fostered the inflation levels to 47.6% in 2018, and to 53.8% in 2019. Furthermore, the Argentine Government reacted by raising interest rates from 27.25% to 60% annually.
In the past, the Argentine government implemented programs to control inflation and monitor prices for essential goods and services, including attempts to freeze the price of certain supermarket products by means of price support arrangements between the government and the private sector. These programs, however, did not address the structural causes for Argentina’s inflation and, consequently, failed to reduce inflation. Nevertheless, in January 2020, the Fernández Administration adopted these type of programs (see “ — Government intervention in Argentina may have a direct impact on our prices and sales” and “-Risks Related to Argentina- The impact of the Argentine congressional and presidential elections on the future economic and political environment of Argentina remains uncertain”).
Inflation in Argentina has contributed to a material increase in our costs of operation, in particular labor costs; it also enables a reduction in the purchasing power of the population, thus increasing the risk of a lower level of consumption from our customers in Argentina, which could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. Inflation rates could continue to grow in the future, and there is uncertainty regarding the effects that any measures adopted by the government could have to control inflation.
Uncertainty surrounding future inflation rates may have an adverse impact for Argentina in the long-term credit market.
The Argentine economy has experienced significant volatility in past decades, including numerous periods of low or negative growth and high and variable levels of inflation and currency devaluation. Inflation remains a challenge for Argentina given its persistent nature in recent years and also considering its high levels during 2019. No assurances can be given that the rate of growth experienced over past years will be achieved in future years or that the national economy will not suffer recession. If economic conditions in Argentina were to continue slowing down, or contract, if inflation were to accelerate further, or if the Argentine government's measures to attract or retain foreign investment and international financing in the future to incentivize domestic economy activity are unsuccessful, such developments could adversely affect Argentina's economic growth and in turn affect our financial health and results of operations.
Inflation can also lead to an increase in Argentina's debt and have an adverse effect on Argentina's ability to service its debt, mainly in the medium and long term when most inflation-indexed debt matures. In addition, weaker fiscal results could have a material adverse effect on the Government's ability to access long term financing, which, in turn, could adversely affect Argentina's economy and financial condition and access to international or domestic capital markets.If the measures adopted by the Argentine government are not able to resolve the structural inflationary disruptions of Argentina, the current inflationary levels could rise and have a negative impact on the economic and financial conditions of Argentina, and as such adversely affect our operations and financial condition (see “— Our results of operations may be adversely affected by high and possibly increasing inflation in Argentina").
High inflation rates affect Argentina’s foreign competitiveness, increase social and economic inequality, negatively impacts employment, consumption and the level of economic activity, and undermines confidence in Argentina’s banking system, which could further limit the availability of and access by local companies to domestic and international credit.
Devaluation of the peso may adversely affect our results of operations, our capital expenditure program and the ability to service our liabilities and transfers of funds abroad.
Argentina has a history of high volatility in its foreign exchange markets, including sharp and unanticipated devaluations, tight foreign exchange controls and severe restrictions on foreign trade. The devaluation of the peso may have a negative impact on the ability of certain Argentine businesses to service their foreign currency denominated debt. It could also lead to higher inflation rates, significantly reduce real wages and jeopardize our business.
The devaluation of the Argentine peso has been continuous during recent history. After several years of moderate variations in the nominal exchange rate, the Argentine peso depreciated 32.6% and 31.1% in 2013 and 2014, respectively, with respect to the U.S. dollar. In 2015, the Argentine peso lost 52.5% of its value with respect to the U.S. dollar, in 2016 depreciated 21.9% and in 2017, depreciated approximately 17.4% of its value with respect to the U.S. dollar. In 2018 the Argentine peso suffered a sharp depreciation which accumulated 102.2% (See “— Our results of operations may be adversely affected by high and possibly increasing inflation in Argentina” and “— The Argentine economy could be adversely affected by economic developments in other markets and by other general “contagion” effects”).
After the results of the primary elections were announced on August 11, 2019, the markets reacted negatively, and the U.S. dollar price jumped from $43.9 pesos to $60.4 at the exchange rate published by the Argentine Central Bank as of August 14, 2019. Consequently, the shares of Argentine companies in the New York stock exchanges and the value of national bonds dropped. Given the political and economic landscape, the Government of former President Macri re-instated rigid restrictions and foreign exchange controls in September 1, 2019, which among other things, significantly curtailed access to the official foreign exchange market by individuals and entities (See "Item 10 — Additional Information-Exchange Controls”). During 2019 the Argentine peso depreciated 58.9% against the U.S. dollar. Furthermore, an unofficial U.S. dollar trading market developed in which the Argentine peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate is significantly higher than the one in the official one. We cannot predict future fluctuations in the Argentine peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate or further foreign exchange restrictions.
Despite the positive effects the depreciation of the Argentine peso may have on the competitiveness of certain sectors of the Argentine economy, including our business, it also had a negative impact on the financial condition of many Argentine businesses and individuals. The devaluation of the Argentine peso affected or may affect the ability of certain Argentine businesses to honor their foreign currency-denominated debt.,generates high levels of inflation, reduces real wages significantly, and has a negative impact on companies oriented to the domestic market, such as public services and the financial industry.
Given the economic and political conditions in Argentina, we cannot predict whether, and to what extent, the value of the peso may depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar, the euro or other foreign currencies. We cannot predict how these conditions will affect our capital expenditure program, the consumption of goods and services we provide to local and foreign costumers or our ability to meet our liabilities denominated in currencies other than the peso. Furthermore, our ability to transfer funds abroad and our ability to pay dividends to shareholders located abroad may be jeopardized if high exchange rate volatility and exchange controls are maintained. Finally, we cannot predict whether the Argentine government will further modify its monetary, fiscal or exchange rate policy in the future.
Additional volatility, appreciation or depreciation of the peso, or reduction in the Argentine Central Bank’s international reserves due to currency interventions could adversely affect the Argentine economy, which in turn may have an adverse effect on our financial conditions and results of operations.
Failure to adequately address actual and perceived risks of institutional corruption may adversely affect Argentina'sthe economy and financial condition.condition of the emerging markets in which we operate.
A lack of a solid and transparent institutional framework for contracts with the Argentine government and its agencies and corruption allegations have affected and continue to affect Argentina. Argentina ranked 6696 of 180 in the Transparency International's 20192021 Corruption Perceptions Index and 12678 of 190179 in the World Bank's Doing Business 20202021 report.
As of the date of this annual report, there are various ongoing investigations into allegations of money laundering and corruption being conducted by the Office of the Argentine Federal Prosecutor, including the largest such investigation, known as the “Notebooks Investigation” (“Los Cuadernos de las Coimas”) which have negatively impacted the Argentine economy and political environment. This investigation relates to notebooks kept by a driver who worked for public officials during the Kirchner Administration. The notebooks allegedly document a widespread corruption scheme involving illegal cash payments by businessmen to government officials in order to win government contracts. As a result of these investigations, several businessmen (including construction company executives) and former public officials have been detained and prosecuted, including the former president and current vice-president of Argentina, Mrs. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, who was prosecuted for illicit association.
Depending on how long it takes to close these investigations and their results, companies involved in the investigations may be subject to, among other things, a decrease in their credit ratings, claims filed by their investors, and may further experience restrictions in their access to financing through the capital markets, together with a decrease in their income. Additionally, as the criminal cases against the companies involved in the investigations move forward, said companies may be restricted from rendering services or may face new restrictions, due to their customers' internal standards. These adverse effects could restrict these companies' ability to conduct their operating activities and to meet their financial obligations. Consequently, the number of suppliers available for our operations may be reduced and, as such, we may experience an adverse effect on our commercial activities and results of operations.
The Argentine government's ability to implement initiatives aimed at strengthening Argentina's institutions and reducing corruption is uncertain as it would be subject to independent review by the judicial branch, as well as legislative support from opposition parties. We cannot give any assuranceassure you that the implementation of these measures by the Argentine government will be successful in stopping institutional deterioration and corruption. Furthermore, we cannot predict what impact these investigations might have or what other measures may be adopted by the courts, the current administration or any future administration, each of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and the results of our operations.
The credibility of several Argentine economic indices has been called into question, which may lead to a lack of confidenceMoreover, in the Argentine economy and may in turn limit our ability to access the credit and capital markets.
Between 2007 and 2014, the inflation index determined by INDEC has been the subject of widespread criticism and extensive discussions in connection with analysispast, members of the Argentine economy, including data on inflation, GDPBrazilian government and unemployment. The intervention of the former Argentine government in the INDEC in 2007 and the change in the way the inflation index was measuredBrazilian legislative branch have resulted in disagreements between the former Argentine government and private consultants as to the actual annual inflation rate. The former Argentine governmentfaced allegations of the Fernández de Kirchner administration imposed fines on private consultants reporting inflation rates higher than the INDEC data.political corruption. As a result, private consultants typically shared their data with Argentine lawmakers who opposed the previous government,a number of politicians, including senior federal officials and who released such data from time to time. The widespread disagreements had the negative effect of eroding public confidence in Argentina’s economy.
Since June 2016, after implementing certain methodological reforms, the CPI was corrected and on November 9, 2016, the Executive Boardcongressmen, resigned and/or have been arrested. Several members of the IMF lifted its censure on Argentina, noting that Argentina had resumed the publicationBrazilian executive and legislative branches of data ingovernment were investigated as a manner consistent with its obligations under the Articlesresult of Agreementallegations of the IMF, recovering credibility. As of the date of this annual report, the impact of any future measures takenunethical and illegal conduct identified by the Fernández administration with respect toCar Wash Operation (Operação Lava-
Jato) by Brazilian federal prosecutors. Any political crisis could worsen the INDEC will have on the Argentine economy and investors’ perception of the country cannot be predicted. Concern regarding lack of accuracyeconomic conditions in the INDEC´s indices couldBrazil, which may adversely affect investor confidence in the Argentine economy and our ability to access international credit markets to finance our operations and growth.
Government intervention in Argentina may have a direct impact on our prices and sales.
The Argentine government has in the past exercised substantial control over the Argentine economy by setting certain industry market conditions and prices. In March 2002, the Argentine government fixed the price for milk after a conflict among producers and the government. In 2005, the Argentine government adopted measures in order to increase the domestic availability of beef and reduce domestic prices. The export tax rate was increased and a minimum weight requirement for animals to be slaughtered was established. In March 2006, sales of beef products to foreign markets were temporarily suspended until prices decreased.
Furthermore, in 2007 the Argentine government significantly increased export tax rates on exports of crops. Several restrictions were also imposed on the grain and oilseed markets that essentially limited the access of traders to exports, resulting in a disparity between domestic and world prices. In March 2012, the Undersecretary of Transport created an “indicative price” for the transportation of grains by road fixed on a quarterly basis. The actual price paid for the road transportation of grains was set to be no lower than 5% or higher than 15% of the “indicative price” fixed for the applicable period. In some cases, the imposition of this “indicative price” produced increases in our transportation costs. In addition, on April 9, 2013, the Secretary of Commerce issued a resolution that established a fixed price for selling liquid hydrocarbons for a six months period. The fixed price would be the highest selling price on the date of issuance of the resolution, in certain regions of the country. Notwithstanding the April 9 resolution, YPF (the Argentine government-controlled oil and gas company) implemented gas price increases that were matched by other oil companies. Due to the increase in the price of the wheat, on July 4, 2013, the Secretary of Commerce issued a resolution mandating wheat producers and distributors to sell their stocks to satisfy the domestic demand, seeking to reduce the wheat price. On January 2014, the Secretary of Commerce launched a new program of price controls called Precios Cuidados. Producers and suppliers committed to fixed prices for more than 300 basic products subject to review on a quarterly basis. As of the date hereof, two of our rice products sold under the trademark “Molinos Ala” and "Apostoles" are subject to this program. Violation of the program may result in sanctions, including fines, which amount will be considered on a case by case basis at the time of issuing the relevant sanction by the enforcement authority.
The two administrations of President Fernández de Kirchner, who governed from 2007 through December 9, 2015, increased state intervention in the Argentine economy, through expropriation and nationalization measures, price controls and foreign exchange controls. Below follows an outline of the main measures taken by such administration on these aspects.
In 2008 the Fernández de Kirchner administration absorbed and replaced the former private pension funds for a fully public pension system. In April 2012, the Fernandez de Kirchner administration decreed the removal of directors and senior officers of YPF S.A., the country’s largest oil and gas company which was controlled by the Spanish group Repsol, and with the approval of the Argentine Congress expropriated shares held by Repsol representing 51% of the shares of YPF, and in 2015, the Argentine Congress passed a law approving the government takeover of the passenger and cargo railways, which became owned by a State-owned company called Ferrocarriles Argentinos Sociedad del Estado. In 2014 the Argentine Tax Authority (“Administración Federal de Ingresos Públicos - AFIP”) established a “Systematic Registration of Movements and Grains Stocks Regime” (Régimen de Registración Sistemática de Movimientos y Existencias de Granos) pursuant to which all persons involved in the commercialization and manufacturing of grains and dairy products registered with the Registry of Operators of the Agro-industrial Chain (Registro Único de Operadores de la Cadena Agroindustrial or “RUCA” after its acronym in Spanish) must report the stock and stock variations (including locations, transport between the producer´s facilities, etc.) of all grains and other agricultural products (other than those to be applied to sowing) held in inventory or through third parties. In 2014 the Argentine Congress enacted the “Supply Law”, that covers the economic process related to goods, facilities and services that directly or indirectly satisfy the basic or essential needs of the population, granting broad delegations of powers on its enforcement authority and provides that in a situation of shortage or scarcity of goods or services which satisfy basic or essential needs destined to the general welfare of the population, the governmental authorities may order their sale, production, distribution and delivery throughout the Argentine territory.
Since taking office in December 2019, the newly elected Fernández Administration also announced the following measures that increased the government intervention: i) the Solidarity Law published on December 23, 2019; ii) the Price Control Program announced on January 7, 2020; iii) the Law of Sustainability of Public Debt under Foreign Law, published on February 13, 2020; and iv) the Supermarkets’ Shelves Law published on March 17, 2020. As of the date of this report it is not possible to predict whether the current administration will promote actions related to price controls of products elaborated by us. In case it does, we cannot predict how these measures will affect our results of operations (see “ — The impact of the Argentine congressional and presidential elections on the future economic and political environment of Argentina remains uncertain”).
Expropriations and other interventions by the Argentine government such as the one relating to YPF can have an adverse impact on the level of foreign investment in Argentina, the access of Argentine companies to the international capital markets and Argentina’s commercial and diplomatic relations with other countries. In the future, the level of governmental intervention in the economy may continue, which may have adverse effects on Argentina’s economy and, in turn, our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Although many of the above measures were adopted or announced by the former Argentine government’s administrations of Fernández de Kirchner, we cannot assure you that the newly elected Fernández Administration will not interfere or increase its intervention by setting prices or regulating other market conditions. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to freely negotiate the prices of all our Argentine products in the future or that the prices or other market conditions that the Fernández Administration might impose will allow us to freely negotiate the prices of our products, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Argentine government may order salary increases to be paid to employees in the private sector, or imposed additional charges, which would increase our operating costs.
In the past, the Argentine government has passed laws, regulations and decrees requiring companies in the private sector to increase wages and provide specified benefits to employees and may do so again in the future. Argentine employers, both in the public and private sectors, have experienced significant pressure from their employees and labor organizations to increase wages and to provide additional employee benefits.
Due to the high levels of inflation, employees and labor organizations are demanding significant wage increases. From August 2012 to October 2019, the Argentine government has increased the minimum salary from Ps. 2,875 to Ps 16,875.
Since 2015, the INDEC has published the Salary Variation Index (Coeficiente de Variación Salarial), an index that shows the evolution of salaries. The Salary Variation Index showed an increase in registered private sector salaries of approximately 33.0% in 2016, 27.3% in 2017, 30.4% in 2018, and 67.0% in 2019. These increases were mainly in line with the inflation prevailing in Argentina.
Also,Finally, under Brazilian law, real property ownership is normally transferred by means of Decree No. 34/2019 issued on December 13, 2019,a transfer deed, and subsequently registered at the Argentine Executive Branch duplicated the amount of the statutory severance payments payable to employees hired before December 13, 2019 and fired between December 13, 2019 and June 13, 2020.
Furthermore,appropriate real estate registry office under the Solidarity Law (See “— The impactcorresponding real property record. There are uncertainties, corruption and fraud relating to title ownership of real estate in Brazil, mostly in rural areas. In certain cases, the Argentine congressionalreal estate registry may register deeds with errors, including duplicate and/or fraudulent entries, and, presidential elections on the future economictherefore, deed challenges frequently occur, leading to judicial actions and political environment of Argentina remains uncertain”) the Fernández Administration is empowered to,police investigations. Property disputes over title ownership are frequent in its sole discretion, provide mandatory salary increases for employees of the private sector, which occurred on January 2020, imposing the payment of an extraordinary non-remunerative bonus of AR$ 4,000 to all workers in the private sector, payable in two installments in January 2020Brazil, and, February 2020. This bonus and similar salary increases and additional payments could also have an effect on inflation.
Due to the high levels of inflation, employers in both the public and private sectors have historically experienced, and currently are experiencing significant pressure from organized labor and their employees to provide further increases in salaries. If, as a result, of such measures, future salary increases in Argentine peso exceedthere is a risk that errors, fraud or challenges could adversely affect us.
Laws on the pace of the devaluation of the Argentine pesos, they could have a material and adverse effect on our expenses and business, results of operations and financial condition.
Argentine law concerning foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina.properties.
In Argentina, Law No. 26,737, passed by the Argentine Congress in December 26,737/2011 and its implementing regulation Decree No. 274/2012, as amended and supplemented by Decree No. 820/2016, dated as of February 28, 2012 and of June 30, 2016, respectively, impose limits on the ownership or possession of rural landproperties by foreign legal entities or certain foreign individuals.
Law No. 26,737 and its implementing regulation require that, “foreign ownership” Under these rules, foreign ownership of rural land may not exceed 15% of the total amount of rural land in the Argentine territory calculated alsoand in relation to the territory of the Province, Departmentprovince, department or Municipalitymunicipality where the relevant lands are located. For purposes of the law, “foreign ownership” meansForeign ownership is defined as the ownership (whether by acquisition, transfer, assignment of rights or otherwise) overof rural land by: (i) certain foreign individuals, regardless of whether they are Argentine residents or not;residents; (ii) legal entities where foreign individuals or entities own, whether directly or indirectly, a number of votes sufficient to prevaildirect the entity’s decision-making process (which is presumed in the local entity’s decision-making process. It is presumed that foreign legal entities in which more thancase of an equity interest greater or equal to 51% of the stock is directly or indirectly owned by foreign individuals or entities are subject to Law No. 26,737;); (iii) companies that issue bonds (a) convertible in stock representing 51%25% or more of the company’s stock upon conversion and (b) whose holders are foreign individuals or entities; (iv) trusts whose beneficiaries are foreign individuals or entities as defined pursuant to (i) and (ii) above;holding an interest of at least 25%; (v) joint ventures in which foreign entities or individuals hold a participatingan interest highergreater than thoseas set forth byin the law; (vi) foreign, public law-governed legal entities; and (vii) simple associations or de facto corporations in which foreigners hold sharesan interest greater than as set forth in the percentage set forth by the new law in relation to corporations or which are controlled by foreigners.
Law No. 26,737 created a A National Registry of Rural Land (Registro(Registro Nacional de Tierras Rurales)Rurales), or the “RNTR,” was made in charge of the enforcement of the provisions of the law and registry of rural land.this framework.
Any modification to the capital stock of companies that own or possess rural land, by public or private instrument, that implies a direct or indirect change of control, must be reported to the National Registry of Rural Land within 30 days from the date of such modification.
In addition, foreign entities or individuals of the samea single nationality may notcannot own more than 4.5% of rural land in Argentina, and a single foreign entity or individual may not own more than 1,000 hectares in thea certain “core area”, or the “equivalent surface”,surface,” as determinedset by the Interministerial Council of Rural Land (Consejo(Consejo Interministerial de Tierras Rurales)Rurales), in accordance with the provinces’ proposal, specifying districts, sub-regions or areas and taking into consideration the location of the land, the proportion of the land area in respect of the total territory of the relevant Province, Departmentprovince, department or Municipalitymunicipality and, the quality of the land for use and exploitation. The “equivalent surface” regime may be modified by the Interministerial Council of Rural Lands considering possible changes in the quality of the land or the growth of urban populations. Pursuant to Decree No. 274/2012, as amended and supplemented by Decree No. 820/2016, the departments that comprise the “core area” are: Marcos Juarez and Unión in the Province of Córdoba; Belgrano, San Martín, San Jerónimo, Iriondo, San Lorenzo, Rosario, Constitución, Caseros and General López in the Province of Santa Fe; and the districts of Leandro N. Alem, General Viamonte, Bragado, General Arenales, Junin, Alberti, Rojas, Chivilcoy, Chacabuco, Colón, Salto, San Nicolás, Ramallo, San Pedro, Baradero, San Antonio de Areco, Exaltación de La Cruz, Capitán Sarmiento, San Andrés de Giles, Pergamino, Arrecifes and Carmen de Areco in the Province of Buenos Aires.
ForeignMoreover, foreign legal entities or individuals may not own rural land that containcontains or areis located next to permanent and significant bodies of water to be determined by the Federal Hydrological Council (Consejo Hídrico Federal) and may also include hydrological works and projects considered strategic and involving the public interest.
Acquisition of rural land will not be deemed as an “investment” under bilateral investment treaties signed by the Argentine Republic, since rural land is deemed as “a non-renewable natural resource”.
The regulatory decrees of Law No. 26,737 provide that no previous authorization certificate is required for certain operations such as: (i) the transfer of the property or possession rights over real estate properties that were located in an “Industrial Area” or an “Industrial Park”, independently from the acquirer’s nationality, (ii) any modificationwater. Any change to the capital stock of companies that own or possess rural land by public or private instrument, when such modification impliesthat results in a direct or indirect change of control provided that such change of control is not made in favor of a new foreign legal entity or individual; and (iii) creation of certain real property rights overmust be reported to the rural land, such as easements.
Upon the issue ofRNTR within 30 days. As an exception, Decree No. 820/2016 the effects of Law No. 26,737 have been somewhat mitigated, by setting forthprovides that a term of 90 days during which the foreign legal entity or individual that has exceededmay exceed the allowed limit of ownership of rural land mustthresholds for up to 90 days, provided they reduce their current ownership to the legal limit by (i) transferring or causing any of its controlled legal entities to transfer the amount of rural land that exceeds the legal limit, or (ii) modifying or causing any of its controlled legal entities to modify the type of exploitation awarded to rural lands owned by such foreign legal entity, or (iii) transferring its participationinterest to permitted legal entities that are considered compliant pursuant to the terms ofunder Law No. 26,737.
Law No. 26,737 initially statedprovided that even though no vested rights couldwere not to be affected as a result of the application of such law, any act in violation ofby its provisions would be considered null and void.application. Decree No. 820/2016820 further clarified this situation and establishedset that the foreign entities or individuals who owned rural land in excess toof the allowed limit of ownership threshold when the Law No. 26,737 came into effect (i) are not obligedrequired to transfer such rural land in excess, and (ii) in the event of transfer of rural lands acquired before Law No. 26,737 came into force, they can acquire the equivalent to such transferred rural land, provided that the legal limits established tofor its use and location were complied with at the typetime of exploitation and location. Hence,such acquisition. As such, the application of these laws regarding foreign ownership of rural lands does not have an adverse effect on the current rural land owned by our Argentine subsidiaries. However, our Argentine subsidiaries may be prevented from acquiring additional rural land in Argentina, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In Brazil, Law No. 5,709/1971 set certain restrictions on the acquisition of rural property by foreigners. Foreign investors may only acquire rural properties in which agricultural, cattle-raising, industrial or colonization projects are going to be developed as approved by the relevant authorities. The total rural area to be acquired by a foreign investor cannot exceed one quarter of the surface of the municipality where it is located, and foreigners of a single nationality cannot cumulatively own more than 10% of the surface of the respective municipality. The acquisition or possession (or any in rem right) by a foreign person of rural property located in an area of national security (i.e. at or near the Brazilian border) must be previously approved by the General Office of the National Security Council (Secretaria-Geral do Conselho de Segurança Nacional). Moreover,
under Law No. 8,629/1993, these restrictions are also applicable to rural lease agreements; however, agriculture partnerships agreements (parcerias agrícolas) are not subject to these restrictions. The acquisition or lease by a foreign person of rural property exceeding 100 indefinite use units (módulos de exploração indefinida), a unit of measurement set by the National Institute of Colonization and Land Reform (Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária), or “INCRA,” must be previously approved by the Brazilian Congress.
Between June 7, 1994 and August 22, 2010, the prevailing view was that Law No. 5,709 did not apply to Brazilian companies directly or indirectly controlled by foreign investors. However, an August 23, 2010 opinion by the Brazilian Solicitor-General’s Office (Advocacia-Geral da União), which was ratified by the President of Brazil, modified this view to confirm that Brazilian entities controlled by foreigners should be subject to these restrictions. We believe, and it is now generally held, that the recorded acquisition of rural land by Brazilian companies directly or indirectly controlled by foreigners prior to August 23, 2010 is not affected by this change in position.
Any new rural land acquisitions by us are nonetheless subject to these restrictions, the waiver of which may be burdensome and time consuming. In order to obtain the authorization for the acquisition or lease of rural properties, foreign investors must present a project proposal to INCRA describing: (i) the relationship between the property and the envisioned project; (ii) the physical and financial schedule of the investment and implementation of the project; (iii) whether governmental funds will finance the project; (iv) the logistical viability of the project and proof of compatibility between the envisioned site and the geographic location of the land; and (v) proof of compatibility with the environmental zoning rules relating to the location of the property. While we conduct our operations.operations in Brazil through local subsidiaries, we would be considered a foreign controlled entity within the meaning of these restrictions. Therefore, if we are unable to comply with these restrictions and obtain the required approvals in connection with future acquisitions or lease transactions, our business plan, contemplated expansion in Brazil and results of operations would be adversely affected. In addition, we cannot assure you that future legislation will not further restrict the acquisition of rural land by Brazilian companies controlled by foreign holders.
An increase in export and import duties and controls may have an adverse impact on our sales.
The Argentine government has historically imposed duties on the exports of various primary and manufactured products, including some of our products. Since then, such export taxes have undergone significant increases, reaching a maximum ofand peaked at 35% in the case of soybean. Currently, most soybean products are leviedis taxed at a 33% export duty rate, whileexport duties on soybean flour and soybean oil have been increased from 31% to 33%, and the government increased the export duty for biodiesel from 29% to 30%. Most other agricultural products are taxed at significantly lower rates.
Theproducts—such as fresh fruit and vegetables, usually grown in specific regions—were set a 0% export duty rate on January 2021. Most industrial and finished goods have had their export duties’ rate reduced throughout 2020 and 2021. In addition, the Social Solidarity Law (2019) established new caps for the Fernandez AdministrationFernández administration to determineset the export duty rate of all goods included in the tariff positions of the Common Mercosur Nomenclature until December 31, 2021. Even though most goods are capped to a maximum 15% ad valorem export duty rate, there are special lower caps for some agricultural products from specific regions and industrial goods. InThe Fernández administration also implemented, on November 2020, export duties rates were raised for soybean products while reduced for other crops and some manufactured goods such as wheat flour. The Fernandez Administration also announced a compensation program for small-scale soybean producers, though it has still not been regulated. Additionally, on December 4, 2018, and in December 28, 2019, duties on the exportation of services were set to a 5% ad valorem export duty rate.
producers. Argentina has also imposed the Import Monitoring System (Sistema(Sistema Integral de Monitoreo de ImportacionesImportaciones) or “SIMI”). Under this new system,“SIMI, whereby importers are required to submit certain information electronically through the SIMI application which, once approved, will be valid for 18090 calendar days.
In addition, the Macri Administrationadministration had enacted an import licensing regime that includes automatic and non-automatic licensing for imports. Automatic import licensing provides that the importer is only required to submit information through the SIMI as well as provide other certification related to the imported goods. Non-automatic licensing provides that the authorities have a 10-day period to either approve or reasonably reject the import license requested based on its effect on local businesses, in addition to the other import requirements that the goods be subject to (SIMI, certifications, etc.).
The current Fernández Administration has determinedrequired that many more tariff codes to undergo non-automatic import licensing procedures to control the flow of imports of final goods. Most raw materials, input for industries and machinery are mainly subject to automatic licensing. In late 2020, many importers have suffered either a delay or blockage on their non-automatic import license applications and started seeking judicial relief to lift the blockages of their prospective imports.
Notwithstanding the above, weWe cannot assure you that there will not be further increases in the export taxes or that other new export taxes or quotas will not be imposed. The imposition of new export taxes or quotas or a significant increase in existing export taxes or the application of export quotas or the imposition of regimes that aim to restrict or control imports and exports could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Exchange controls restrict the inflow and outflow of funds in Argentina and may substantially limit the ability of companies to retain or obtain foreign currency or make payments abroad.
FromIn the past, the Brazilian economy has experienced balance of payment deficits and shortages in foreign exchange reserves, and the Brazilian government has responded by restricting the ability of Brazilian or foreign persons or entities to convert reais into foreign currencies. The Brazilian government may institute a restrictive exchange control policy in the future. Any restrictive exchange control policy could prevent or restrict our Brazilian subsidiaries’ access to U.S. dollars, and consequently their ability to meet their U.S. dollar obligations and may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In turn, between 2011 and until President Macri took office,2015, the Argentine government increased controls and restrictions on the sale of foreign currencies and the acquisition of foreign assets by Argentine residents, limitingand limited the possibilitytransfer of transferring funds abroad. Through a combination of foreign exchange and tax regulations, the Fernández de Kirchner administration significantly curtailed access to the Foreign Exchange Market (Mercado Único y Libre de Cambios or “MULC”)foreign exchange market by individuals and private-sector entities. In addition, duringentities, and the last few years under the Fernández de Kirchner administration, the Argentine Central BankBCRA exercised a de facto prior approval for certain foreign exchange transactions otherwise authorized to be carried out under the applicable regulations, such as dividend payments or repayment of principal of intercompany loans as well as the payments related to import of goods, by means of regulating the amount of foreign currency available to companies to conduct such transactions. The number ofThese exchange controls introduced in the past and after 2011 during the Fernández de Kirchner administration gave rise to an unofficial U.S. dollar trading market, and the unofficial Argentine peso to U.S. dollar exchange rate in such market differed substantially from the official Argentine peso to U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Due to the foreign exchange crisis generated in August 2019 and the continued reduction of the Argentine Central Bank’sBCRA’s foreign currency reserves, since September 1, 2019 the Argentine government has reinstated, in 2019, rigid exchange controls and transfer restrictions, substantially limiting the ability to obtain foreign currency or make certain payments or distributions out of Argentina, (see "Item 10 - Additional Information-Exchange Controls”).which have been extended without time limitation by Decree No. 91/2019, and BCRA Communication “A” 6,862/2020. In response to these exchange restrictions, an unofficial U.S. dollar trading market developed once again. In addition, access to foreign currency and its transfer outside of Argentina can also be obtained and carried out through capital markets transactions denominated blue-chip swap, subject to certain restrictions, which is significantly more expensive than acquiring foreign currency in the FX Market.
Notwithstanding the measures adopted by the Argentine government inrecently, the recent months, itgovernment may impose additional exchange controls, transfer restrictions, restrictions on the free movement of capital, and may implement other measures in response to capital flight or a significant depreciation of the Argentine peso, which would adversely affect our financial condition and the results of our operations. In addition, other exchange controls could in the future further impair or prevent the conversion of anticipated dividends, distributions, or the proceeds from any sale of equity holdings in Argentina from Argentine pesos into U.S. dollars and the remittance of the U.S. dollars abroad. These restrictions and controls could further interfere with the ability of our Argentine subsidiaries to make distributions in U.S. dollars to us and thus our ability to pay dividends in the future. Such measures could lead to renewed political and social tensions, and could undermine the Argentine government’s public finances, which could adversely affect Argentina’s economy and prospects for economic growth and, consequently, adversely affect our business and results of operations, and could impair our ability to make dividend payments.
In an effort to contain the escalation of the currency exchange rate, the BCRA has been selling its reserves of U.S. dollars, which has resulted in a decrease in BCRA international reserves from US$65.7 billion as of December 2018 to US$37.0 billion as of March 2022. However, the actual net liquid international reserves of the BCRA is reported by private sources to be substantially lower. Moreover, the Argentine government has been financing all economic assistance related to the COVID-19 pandemic with a significant issuance of currency, which has also contributed to increased inflation, the demand for U.S. dollars and the devaluation of the peso.
See “Item 10. Additional Information—D. Exchange Controls.”
Changes in the Argentine tax laws may have a material adverse impact on the taxes applicable to our business and may increase our tax burden.
Changes in tax laws, regulations, related interpretations and tax accounting standards in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Luxembourg or the United States may result in a higher tax rate on our earnings, which may significantly reduce our profits and cash flows from operations.
The Brazilian government frequently implements changes to the Brazilian tax regime that may affect us and our clients. These changes include changes in prevailing tax rates and, occasionally, imposition of temporary taxes, the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated Brazilian government purposes. Some of these changes may result in increases in our tax payments, which could adversely affect industry profitability and increase the prices of our products, restrict our ability to do business in our existing and target markets and cause our financial results to suffer.
Recently, Brazilian government initiatives have proposed changes to the Brazilian tax regime that, if enacted, could impact our business. Bill No. 3,887/2020 would replace the PIS/COFINS tax (a social contribution on gross revenues) with a new Contribution on Goods and Services (CBS), and Bill No. 2,337/2021 would comprehensively reform income taxation rules primarily by revoking the income tax exemption on the distribution of dividends by Brazilian companies while also introducing new anti-avoidance provisions for a broad variety of transactions among related parties, ending the deductibility of interest on equity expenses, extending the minimum term for the amortization of intangibles, and changing the income tax rules related to Brazilian investment funds, among other changes. More specifically, ending the deductibility of interest on equity would impact the net amount to be received by our shareholders in the form of dividends. Although these laws have not yet been enacted and it is not possible to determine at this time the exact changes that will eventually pass into law, any such changes could have adverse effects on our results and operations. Further, Brazilian government authorities at the federal, state and local levels may consider changes in tax laws to cover budgetary shortfalls resulting from the recent economic downturn in Brazil, including the impact of COVID-19. If enacted, such changes may harm our profitability by increasing our tax burden, increasing our tax compliance costs or otherwise affecting our financial condition, results of our operations financial condition and cash flows. The Brazilian government regularly enacts reforms to the tax and other assessment regimes to which we and our customers are subject. Such reforms include changes in tax rates and, occasionally, enactment of temporary levies, the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated governmental purposes. The effects of these changes and any other changes that result from the enactment of additional tax reforms cannot be quantified and there can be no assurance that any such reforms would not have an adverse effect upon our business. Furthermore, such changes may produce uncertainty in the financial system, increasing the cost of borrowing and contributing to an increase in our non-performing credit portfolio. The effects of these changes and any other change that could result from the enactment of additional legislation cannot be quantified. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our projected cash flow and profitability following any increases in Brazilian taxes applicable to us and our operations.
OnSimilarly, on December 29, 2017, the Argentine Governmentgovernment enacted Law No. 27,430, (the "Taxor the “Tax Reform Law"),Law,” a comprehensive tax reform which became effective on January 1, 2018. Specifically, Law No. 27,430 introduced amendments to income tax (both at corporate and individual levels), value added tax, tax procedural law, criminal tax law, social security contributions, excise tax, tax on fuels and tax on the transfer of real estate. In addition, the Solidarity Law, introduced important tax modifications -among other provisions- which modified the Tax Reform Law, provided measures regarding employer contributions, applicable rates for foreign goods and created, in regards to the Tax for an Inclusive and Solidary Argentina, an 8% rate for the acquisition of digital services and a 30% rate for the acquisition services abroad and passenger transport services destined outside the country (see “—
The impact of the Argentine congressional and presidential elections on the future economic and political environment of Argentina remains uncertain”).
The Tax Reform Law introduced several amendments in connection with federal income tax, such as the progressive reduction of the tax rate on corporate level from 35% to a 30% applicable to the fiscal periods starting on January 1, 2018 until December 31, 2019; and to 25% applicable to the fiscal periods starting on January 1, 2020, and established that dividends or other profits distributed to Argentine resident individuals and foreign beneficiaries would be subject to taxation. Therefore, as of January 1, 2018, income tax on Argentine resident companies and branches of non-Argentine entities applies in two stages: (i) a first stage is charged at the corporate level (at a tax rate of 30% or 25%, depending on the fiscal period involved, as explained above); and (ii) a second stage is charged at the shareholder or owner level - level—in respect of an Argentine resident individual or a foreign beneficiary- (atbeneficiary—at a tax rate of 7% or 13%, according to the fiscal period from which the distributed profit derived).derived. Such tax treatment was amended by the Social Solidarity Law, which established: (i) the suspension up toof one fiscal years to be initiated as ofyear, beginning on January 1, 2021, inclusive, of the 25% corporate income tax rate and of the 13% tax rate applicable on dividends; and that (ii) on such periods of suspension, the applicable rate on corporate income tax will be of 30% and the applicable rate on dividends will be of 7%.
The Tax Reform Law further eliminated the equalization tax, which levied distributions made out of previously untaxed income, was eliminated.income. The sale, exchange or disposition of shares and other securities not trading in, or listed on, capital markets and securities exchanges by resident individuals and foreign beneficiaries in general is subject to tax at a rate of 15%. Non-residents can opt to be taxed at a rate of 15% on the net gain or 13.5% on the gross amount of the transaction, at the option of the seller.
On June 16, 2021, the Argentine government enacted Law No. 27,630 which amended the Argentine income tax law and replaced the fixed rate paid by Argentine companies on their corporate income from 30% to a progressive rate ranging from 25% to 35% for tax periods starting on January 1, 2021. Subject to net income amounts, companies will have to pay a fixed amount and a progressive rate over the surplus of the minimum base rate in their category. These amounts will be adjusted once a year starting on January 1, 2022 per the CPI variation. The applicable rate over profits and dividends paid to shareholders, whether they are individuals, or undivided estates residing in Argentina or foreign residents, will continue to be 7% in all cases, regardless of the tax rate paid by the company at the corporate level.
In addition, the Social Solidarity Law amended the Tax Reform Law to govern employer contributions and the applicable rates for foreign goods and created an 8% tax rate for the acquisition of digital services and a 30% rate for the acquisition services abroad and passenger transport services destined outside the country. The Social Solidarity Law also introduced other amendments to the income tax, personal assets tax, excise tax on certain goods, tax on debits and credits in local bank accounts and social security rules. It also established a new tax on certain purchases of foreign currency, a new tax debt settlement plan for certain taxpayers, and established new rates on exports of goods and services. Argentine companies are required to pay personal assets tax corresponding to Argentine resident individuals, foreign individuals and foreign entities for holding equity interests in such companies as of December 31 of each year. Under the Social Solidarity Law, the tax rate applicable to shares or interests in the capital of companies governed by the Argentine corporate law was increased from 0.25% to 0.50% of the pro rata equity value. The tax is levied on the equity stated in the latest financial statements.
These and other changes in theBrazilian and Argentine tax laws could adversely affect our operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Risks Related to Brazil
The measures taken or to be implemented by the Brazilian government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause adverse effect on our business and operations.
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. This pandemic, as well as the reality or fear of any other adverse public health developments, could adversely and materially affect, among other things, our manufacturing and supply chain operations, including due to the reduction or closure of our production units and the interruption of the supply of raw materials (see “— Risks Related to Our Business and Industries-The COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operating results”).
In this regard, the Brazilian federal, state and municipal governments and other authorities have enacted a number of rules to adress the potential impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak. Considering the possible outcomes thereof, we may be exposed to additional risks, which include:
| |
(i) | to contain or delay the spread of COVID-19, the Brazilian Ministry of Health, as well as several state and municipal authorities have adopted or recommended social distancing measures, which may ultimately result in severe fines/penalties; |
| |
(ii) | in March 2020, the Brazilian government created a Crisis Committee to Monitor the Impacts of COVID-19 in Brazil. Since then, it has announced several measures (tax or otherwise) to adress the effects of COVID-19 in Brazil. Likewise, the Brazilian Congress is currently discussing several measures to increase the Brazilian government’s revenues, such as imposing new taxes, revoking tax benefits and increasing the rates of current taxes, including the following: |
| |
◦ | creating a new tax as a Compulsory Loan (“Empréstimo Compulsório”) that would be imposed on companies whose net equity exceeds the amount to be established by law. A compulsory loan is a refundable federal tax that can be established in case of war or public calamity. The terms of this new tax are not yet clear, so we cannot predict the possible impacts on us; and
|
| |
◦ | revoke the tax exemption granted to dividend distributions paid by Brazilian companies, which could affect the return of our investments, as well as of our shareholders. |
| |
(iii) | States and municipalities may also revoke tax benefits and/or increase the rates of current taxes to increase its revenues. See “— We receive certain tax benefits from Brazilian Tax Authorities which we cannot assure will be maintained or renewed;” and
|
| |
(iv) | the Brazilian Congress is currently discussing a Bill which, if approved, will impose mandatory and temporary postponement the term of rural leases on certain situations, preventing lessors from terminating such agreements and filing for repossession of the leased land. |
These new rules, if approved, may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
Further, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and any possible future outbreaks of viruses may have a significant adverse effect on us. Firstly, a spread of such diseases amongst our employees, as well as any quarantines affecting them or our facilities could adversely impact the productivity of our personnel and thereby affect our operations, which can impact the quality and continuity of our activities and, ultimately, our reputation. Secondly, the current COVID-19 pandemic and any possible future outbreaks of viruses may have an adverse effect on our suppliers and/or transportation companies used to distribute our products. Thirdly, any quarantines or spread of viruses may adversely affect the demand of our products from end-consumers.
It is also possible that our commercial contracts, including power supply agreements, could be affected by adverse impacts derived from the COVID-19 pandemic, since the parties thereto may not comply with their contractual obligations. As the COVID-19 pandemic will most likely be considered as an act of God or force majeure event by Brazilian courts, parties may justify their nonperformance and request (i) termination without penalties; (ii) adjustment and/or release of contractual obligations; (iii) adjustment and/or release of the effects of arrears; and/or (iv) adjustment and/or release of penalties for breach of contract, which, in any case, may cause a negative impact on our results of operations.
Additionally, our operations may be adversely affected by the wider macroeconomic effect of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, it is expected there be a recession or diminishing growth in several countries, including Brazil, due to the freeze of the economic activities. The updated forecast for the 2020 Brazilian GDP sets out a recession scenario. The final effects
of the COVID-19 pandemic could have substantial negative impact on the countries where we operate. Any negative effect on the economy, particularly in the countries that we operate, may decrease incomes and the demand for our products. Lastly, in case of an economic downturn, the price of our common shares may be adversely affected.
Moreover, Brazil is experiencing political disagreements among governments and other authorities in connection with the measures that have been adopted and the ones that might be implemented. These institutional conflicts as well as the potential adoption of measures against WHO’s recommendations may lead to political turmoil and, ultimately, civil riots and impeachment process.
Lastly, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the possible outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic and we cannot assure that other measures will be implemented to mitigate the impacts of the COVID-19 and whether they will mean tougher restrictions or limitations that could affect our operations. In addition, the deterioration of global economic conditions as a result of the pandemic may ultimately decrease customer demand for our products and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Brazilian economic and political conditions and perceptions of these conditions in international markets have a direct impact on our business and our access to international capital and debt markets, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
A significant portion of our operations, properties and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on economic conditions in Brazil. The Brazilian economy has experienced significant volatility in recent decades, characterized by periods of low or negative growth, high and variable levels of inflation and currency devaluation. Brazil’s GDP grew by 3.0% in 2013, decreased 0.5% in 2014, decreased 3.5% in 2015, decreased 3.3% in 2016, increased 1.3% in 2017, increased 1.3% in 2018 and increased 1.1% in 2019. We cannot assure you that GDP will increase or remain stable in the future. Future developments in the Brazilian economy may affect Brazil’s growth rates and, consequently, the consumption of sugar, ethanol, and our other products. As a result, these developments could impair our business strategies, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, due to the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak, it is expected that Brazil’s GDP for 2020 fiscal year will have a substantial negative impact and will face economic recession. See “—Risks Related to Our Business and Industries -The COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect our business and operating results.” and "Risks Related to Brazil - The measures taken or to be implemented by the Brazilian Government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause adverse effect on our business and operations".
Historically, Brazil’s political situation has influenced the performance of the Brazilian economy, and political crisis have affected the confidence of investors and the general public, which has resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities issued abroad by Brazilian companies. Future developments in policies of the Brazilian government and/or the uncertainty of whether and when such policies and regulations may be implemented.
Changes in Brazilian tax laws may have a material adverse impact on the taxes applicable to our business and may increase our tax burden.
The Brazilian government frequently implements changes to the Brazilian tax regime that may affect us and our clients. These changes include changes in prevailing tax rates and, occasionally, imposition of temporary taxes, the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated Brazilian government purposes. Some of these changes may result in increases in our tax payments, which could adversely affect industry profitability and increase the prices of our products, restrict our ability to do business in our existing and target markets and cause our financial results to suffer.
Over the past years Brazil has faced an economic recession and the Government is adopting fiscal adjustment measures. Any fiscal adjustment is complex and involves radical and unpopular measures. The Minister of Finance has also been raising the possibility of increasing or creating new taxes. For example, the Brazilian government may reduce or increase at any time through a presidential decree the rates of the tax levied on financial operations, such as credit transactions (“IOF/Credit”), foreign exchange transactions (“IOF/Exchange”), derivative securities transactions (“IOF/Securities”), among other taxable events. On March, 30, 2017, a presidential decree was published in order to introduce a 0.38% rate of the IOF/Credit on some loan transactions, such as credits provided by cooperatives, which were previously subject to a zero percent rate.
It is also common for taxpayers to file suits for the declaration that a certain tax is illegal or unconstitutional. Such cases where the final decision is favorable to taxpayers, a situation that occurs very frequently. Accordingly, the Brazilian Government may propose changes in the tax legislation in order to increase rates, tax basis and/or to create new taxes.
The effects of these changes and any other change that could result from the enactment of additional legislation cannot be quantified. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our projected cash flow and profitability following any increases in Brazilian taxes applicable to us and our operations.
We receive certain tax benefits from Brazilian Tax Authoritiestax authorities, which we cannot assure will be maintained or renewed.
We receive certain tax benefits by virtue of our production facilities and investment projects in underdeveloped regions in Brazil. Our mainThese tax benefitincentives reduce the amount of the ICMS (circulationBrazilian sales tax for goods and services) from(Imposto sobre Operações relativas à Circulação de Mercadorias e sobre Prestações de Serviços de Transporte Interestadual e Intermunicipal e de Comunicação), or “ICMS,” due in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul (Ivinhemaas a result of the Ivinhema and Angélica Mill) wasmills. These benefits were most recently renewed until 2032.
We cannot assure you that the tax incentives we currently benefit from will be maintained, renewed or that we will obtain new tax incentives on favorable terms. In the event we fail to comply with specific obligations to which we are subject in connection with the tax benefits described above, such benefits may be suspended or cancelled, or we may be required to pay the taxes due in full, plus penalties, which may adversely affect us. Additionally, we cannot assure you that we will be able to renew these tax benefits when they expire, or to obtain additional tax benefits under favorable conditions. State and federal governments frequently implement changes to the tax regimes, such as changes in tax rates, thatwhich may adversely affect us or our customers. If our current tax benefits are cancelled or not renewed, we may be materially adversely affected.
Since 2018, after the publication of the complementary law 160/17, there is no risk of questioning the constitutionality of the tax benefit.
Widespread corruption and fraud relating to ownership of real estate may adversely affect our business, especially our land transformation business.
Under Brazilian Legislation, real property ownership is normally transferred by means of a transfer deed, and subsequently registered at the appropriate Real Estate Registry Office under the corresponding real property record. There are uncertainties, corruption and fraud relating to title ownership of real estate in Brazil, mostly in rural areas. In certain cases, the Real Estate Registry Office may register deeds with errors, including duplicate and/or fraudulent entries, and, therefore, deed challenges frequently occur, leading to judicial actions. Property disputes over title ownership are frequent in Brazil, and, as a result, there is a risk that errors, fraud or challenges could adversely affect us.
Social movements and the possibility of expropriation and constitution of public easement may affect the normal use of, damage, or deprive us of the use of or fair value of, our properties.
Social movements, such as Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra and Comissão Pastoral da Terra, are active in Brazil and advocate land reform and mandatory property redistribution by the Brazilian government. Land invasions and occupations of rural areas by a large number of individuals is common practice for these movements, and, in certain areas, including those in which we have invested or are likely to invest, police protection and effective eviction proceedings are not available to land owners. As a result, we cannot assure you that our properties will not be subject to invasion or occupation by these groups. A land invasion or occupation could materially impair the normal use of our lands or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or the value of our common shares. In addition, our land may be subject to expropriation by the Brazilian government. Under Article 184 of the Brazilian Constitution, the Brazilian government may expropriate land that is not in compliance with mandated local “social functions”. A “social function” is defined in Article 186 of the Brazilian Constitution as (i) rational and adequate exploitation of land; (ii) adequate use of natural resources available and preservation of the environment; (iii) compliance with labor laws; and (iv) exploitation of land to promote welfare of owners and employees. If the Brazilian government decides to expropriate any of our properties, our results of operations may be adversely affected, to the extent that potential compensation to be paid by the Brazilian government may be less than the profit we could make from the sale or use of such land. Disputing the Brazilian government’s (*) expropriation of land is usually time-consuming and the outcomes of such challenges are uncertain. In addition, we may be forced to accept public debt bonds, which have limited liquidity, as compensation for expropriated land instead of cash.
Moreover, along with the expropriation rights, the Brazilian legislation also confers to the Government (or the Concessionary of public services) the power to constitute public easements over third-parties real estate properties. Public easements are commonly used in those situations which the infrastructure project requires the use of a portion of several real estate properties, mostly in rural areas, such as the installation of transmission lines or oil and gas pipelines.
Public easement also requires the payment of a fair and prior indemnification, which authorizes the government (or concessionary of public services) to use such property for public interest. The institution of public easement shall observe the same procedure for expropriation of real estate property. However, unlike expropriation, the public easement does not remove the
property from the owner's estate, but only creates the right of using the property or part of it. The constitution of a public easement will prevent the use of the part of the property and our results of operations may be adversely affected if such easement is constituted in into the liquidity area of our farmland holdings.
Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.
Brazilian Federal Law No. 5,709, effective October 7, 1971 (“Law 5709”) established certain restrictions on the acquisition of rural property by foreigners, including that (i) foreign investors may only acquire rural properties in which agricultural, cattle-raising, industrial or colonization projects are going to be developed as approved by the relevant authorities; (ii) the total rural area to be acquired by a foreign investor cannot exceed one quarter of the surface of the municipality where it is located, and foreigners with the same nationality may not own, cumulatively, more than 10% of the surface of the municipality in which it is located; and (iii) the acquisition or possession (or any in rem right) by a foreigner of rural property situated in an area considered important to national security (i.e. land located at or near the Brazilian border) must be previously approved by the General Office of the National Security Council (Secretaria-Geral do Conselho de Segurança Nacional). Pursuant to Article 23 of Law No. 8,629, of February 25, 1993 (“Law 8629”), the restrictions mentioned in items (i) and (ii) above established by Law 5709 are also applicable for rural lease agreements executed by foreigners. “Parcerias Agrícolas” (agriculture partnerships agreements) have not been subject to these restrictions. The Federal General Attorney’s Office (“AGU”) on October 8, 2012 issued a legal opinion 005/2012, pursuant to which the AGU confirmed the understanding that the “Parcerias Rurais” are not subject to the restrictions or limitations of Law 5709. In addition, pursuant to Law 8629, the acquisition or lease by a foreigner of a rural property exceeding 100 módulos de exploração indefinida – “MEI,” a measurement unit defined by the Regional Superintendence of the National Institute of Colonization and Land Reform (Superintendencia Regional do Instituto Nacional de Colonizaçao e Reforma Agrária – “INCRA”) must be previously approved by the Brazilian National Congress. Law 5709 also establishes that the same restrictions apply to Brazilian companies that are directly or indirectly controlled by foreign investors. Any acquisition or lease of rural property by foreigners in violation of the terms of Law 5709 would be considered null and void under Brazilian law.
Since the enactment of the Brazilian Constitution in 1988, the consensus view was that the restrictions imposed by Federal Law 5709 on the acquisition or lease of rural property above-mentioned did not apply to Brazilian companies controlled by foreigners, pursuant to legal opinion No. GQ-22, issued by the AGU in 1994, which was ratified by legal opinion No. GQ-181, also issued by the AGU in 1998. The Brazilian Constitution and its amendments, in particular Constitutional Amendment No. 6, of August 15, 1995, provides that (i) no restrictions on the acquisition of rural land in Brazil should apply to Brazilian companies; and (ii) any company incorporated and headquartered in Brazil and controlled by foreign investors must receive the same treatment as any other company incorporated and headquartered in Brazil and controlled by Brazilian investors. However, the Brazilian Justice National Council issued an Official Letter on July 13, 2010 addressed to all the Brazilian local State Internal Affairs Bureaus in order for them to adopt procedures within sixty (60) days and instruct the local State Notary and Real Estate Registry Offices to observe the restrictions of the Brazilian law on the acquisitions of rural land by Brazilian companies with foreign equity holders. Thereafter, on August 19, 2010, the AGU revised its prior opinion, and published a new legal opinion which: (i) revoked the AGU’s legal opinions No. GQ-22 and GQ-181; and (ii) confirmed that Brazilian entities controlled by foreigners should be subject to the restrictions described above, and transactions entered into by foreigners in connection with the acquisition of rural properties would be subject to approval from INCRA, the Ministry of Agrarian Development and the Brazilian National Congress, when applicable. This revised opinion was ratified by the President of Brazil and published in the Official Gazette of the Federal Executive on August 23, 2010, becoming effective as of such date. We believe that the acquisitions of rural properties by Brazilian companies directly or indirectly controlled by foreigners registered in the appropriate real estate registry prior to August 23, 2010 are not affected by the AGU’s legal opinion. As a confirmation of such understanding, pursuant to the Joint Normative Ruling N. 1 issued on September 27, 2012 by the Ministries of: (i) Agricultural Development; (ii) Agriculture, Cattle-raising and Supply; (iii) Industry Development and Foreign Commerce; and (iv) Tourism (the “Joint Normative Ruling N. 1”); and the Normative Ruling/IN INCRA No.76, issued on August 23, 2013, a Brazilian company controlled by foreign individuals or companies which acquired or leased rural properties, by means of an act or agreement entered into from June 7, 1994 and August 22, 2010, may register such property before the National System of Rural Registry (Sistema Nacional de Cadastro Rural-SNCR), without any administrative sanction. However, as of said date, the acquisition and leasing of rural land in Brazil, including through corporate transactions, will be subject to the above-mentioned restrictions, and will require several additional layers of review and approvals, which may be discretionary (including the approvals from INCRA, Ministry of Agrarian Development and the Brazilian National Congress, when applicable), burdensome and time consuming. Additionally, the Joint Normative Ruling N. 1 sets forth the administrative procedures applicable to requests for authorization for the acquisition or lease of rural properties by foreign investors pursuant to Law 5709. Under the Joint Normative Ruling, in order to obtain the authorization for the acquisition or lease of rural properties, foreign investors must present a project proposal to the INCRA, containing: (i) the rationale for the relationship between the property to be acquired or leased and the project size; (ii) physical and financial schedule of the investment and implementation of the project; (iii) use of official credit (governmental funds) for the total or partial finance of the project; (iv) logistic viability of the execution of the project and, in case of an industrial project, proof of compatibility between the local industrial sites and
the geographic location of the lands; and (v) proof of compatibility with the criteria established by the Brazilian Ecological and Economical Zoning (Zoneamento Ecológico Econômico do Brasil – ZEE), relating to the location of the property.
While we conduct our operations in Brazil through local subsidiaries, we would be considered a foreign controlled entity within the meaning of the restrictions described above. Therefore, if we are not able to comply with these restrictions and obtain the required approvals in connection with future acquisitions or lease transactions, our business plan, contemplated expansion in Brazil and results of operations will be adversely affected.
Furthermore, there is currently proposed legislation under review in the Brazilian National Congress regarding the acquisition of rural land by Brazilian companies controlled by foreign holders, which if approved may further limit and restrict the investments of companies with foreign equity capital in rural land in Brazil. Such further restrictions, if adopted, may place more strain on our ability to expand our operations in Brazil.
The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy, which, combined with Brazilian political and economic conditions, may adversely affect us.
We may be adversely affected by the following factors, as well as the Brazilian government’s response to these factors:
economic and social instability;
increase in interest rates;
exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;
restrictions and taxes on agricultural exports;
exchange rate fluctuations;
inflation;
volatility and liquidity in domestic capital and credit markets;
expansion or contraction of the Brazilian economy, as measured by GDP growth rates;
allegations of corruption against political parties, elected officials or other public officials, including allegations made in relation to the “Car Wash Operation” (Operação Lava-Jato) investigation;
government measures aimed at controlling the COVID-19 outbreak;
government policies related to our sector;
fiscal or monetary policy and amendments to tax legislation; and
other political, diplomatic, social or economic developments in or affecting Brazil.
Historically, the Brazilian government has frequently intervened in the Brazilian economy and has occasionally made significant changes in economic policies and regulations, including, among others, the imposition of a tax on foreign capital entering Brazil (IOF tax), changes in monetary, fiscal and tax policies, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports. The administration is currently facing domestic pressure to retreat from the current macroeconomic policies in an attempt to achieve higher rates of economic growth. In addition, the Brazilian government has discussed the creation of a tax on financial transactions, including wire transfers, (the so-called “CPMF”) in order to improve the fiscal situation of the country or to increase the IOF taxation. We cannot predict which policies will be adopted by the Brazilian government and whether these policies will negatively affect the economy or our business or financial performance.
The Brazilian economy has been experiencing a slowdown over the past years and the Brazil’s GDP growth has fluctuated over the past few years, with growth of 3.0% in 2013, increasing 0.5% in 2014 and then to a contraction of 3.5% in 2015, a contraction of 3.3% in 2016, an increase of 1.3% in 2017, an increase of 1.3% in 2018 and an increase of 1.1% in 2019. Inflation, unemployment and interest rates have increased more recently and the Brazilian Real has weakened significantly in comparison to the U.S. dollar. The market expectations for 2020 are that the Brazilian economy will experience a severe slowdown and the GDP will decrease, particularly due to the COVID-19 outbreak. Our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by the economic conditions in Brazil.
Allegations of political corruption against the Brazilian government and the Brazilian legislative branch could create economic and political instability.
In the past, members of the Brazilian government and of the Brazilian legislative branch have faced allegations of political corruption. As a result, a number of politicians, including senior federal officials and congressmen, resigned and/or have been arrested. Several members of the Brazilian executive and legislative branches of government were investigated as a result of allegations of unethical and illegal conduct identified by the Car Wash Operation (Operação Lava-Jato) being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor. Any political crisis could worsen the economic conditions in Brazil, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition
Moreover, the economic and political crisis have resulted in a further downgrading of the country’s long-term credit rating from two of the three major rating companies, placing Brazil 3 notches below the limit of the speculative investment grade level (“junk”). Standard & Poor's downgraded Brazil to BB with a stable outlook in January 2018, Fitch Ratings downgraded to BB- with a stable outlook in February 2018, while Moody’s maintained its Ba2 rating, with a negative outlook since May 2017. Brazil’s sovereign rating is currently rated by the three major risk rating agencies as follows: BB- by S&P and Fitch Ratings and Ba2 by Moody’s. Various major Brazilian companies were also downgraded. Such downgrades have further worsened the conditions of the Brazilian economy and the condition of Brazilian companies, especially those relying on foreign investments.
Restrictions on the movement of capital out of Brazil may impair our ability to receive payments from our Brazilian Subsidiaries and restrict their ability to make payments in U.S. dollars.
In the past, the Brazilian economy has experienced balance of payment deficits and shortages in foreign exchange reserves, and the Brazilian government has responded by restricting the ability of Brazilian or foreign persons or entities to convert reais into foreign currencies. The Brazilian government may institute a restrictive exchange control policy in the future. Any restrictive exchange control policy could prevent or restrict our Brazilian Subsidiaries’ access to U.S. dollars, and consequently their ability to meet their U.S. dollar obligations and may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our business in Brazil is subject to governmental regulation.
Our Brazilian operations are subject to a variety of national, state, and local laws and regulations, including environmental, agricultural, health and safety and labor laws. We invest financial and managerial resources to comply with these laws and related permit requirements. Our failure to do so could subject us to fines or penalties, enforcement actions, claims for personal injury or property damages, or obligations to investigate and/or remediate damage or injury. Moreover, if applicable laws and regulations, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, become more stringent in the future, our capital or operating costs could increase beyond what we currently anticipate, and the process of obtaining or renewing licenses for our activities could be hindered or even opposed by the competent authorities.
We are also subject to laws and regulations imposed in Brazil and its agencies, including (i) the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustível) and by the Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica) on account of our production of sugarcane, ethanol and electricity (ii) the Ministry of Agriculture, Breeding Cattle and Supply (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento), on account of our agricultural, sugarcane and ethanol production activities. If an adverse final decision is issued in an administrative process, we could be exposed to penalties and sanctions derived from the violation of any of these laws and regulations, including the payment of fines, and, depending on the level of severity applied to the infraction, the closure of facilities and/or stoppage of activities and the cancellation or suspension of the registrations, authorizations and licenses, which may also result in temporary interruption or discontinuity of activities in our plants, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Government laws and regulations in Brazil governing the burning of sugarcane could have a material adverse impact on our business or financial performance.
In Brazil, a relevant percentage of sugarcane is currently harvested by burning the crop, which removes leaves in addition to eliminating insects and other pests. The states of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso do Sul, among others, have established laws and regulations that limit and/or entirely prohibit the burning of sugarcane and there is a likelihood that increasingly stringent regulations will be imposed by those states and other governmental agencies in the near future.
Such limitations arise from a Brazilian Federal Decreefederal decree that set forth the completegradual elimination of the harvest by burning the crop until 2018 in areas where it is possible to carry out mechanized harvest. In the state of Minas Gerais, the deadline imposed by the State Government for the elimination of the harvest by burning the crop is 2014, for areas with declivity lower than 12%, and for areas with declivity higher than 12%, they are subject to an additional term at the discretion of the State Environmental Agency, on a case by case basis. Nevertheless, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, the current deadline is 2018 for the elimination of harvest by burning the crop for areas where mechanized harvest can be carried out, as per the Brazilian Federal Decree.
The strengthening of the laws and regulations or thea total prohibition ofban on sugarcane burning would require us to increase our planned investment in harvesting equipment, which, in turn, would limit our ability to fund other investments. In addition, the state of São Paulo has imposed an obligation on growers to dedicate a certain percentage of land used for sugarcane cultivation for native or reclaimed forest area. The cost of setting aside this land is difficult to predict and may increase costs for us or our sugarcane suppliers. As a result, the costs to comply with existing or new laws or regulations are likely to increase, and, in turn, our ability to operate our plants and harvest our sugarcane crops may be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Common Shares
The price of our common shares may be highly volatile.
We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our common shares will create or be able to maintain an active trading market, or how liquid that market will be in the future. The market price of our common shares may be volatile and may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:
•the failure of financial analysts to cover our common shares or changes in financial estimates by analysts;
•actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;
•changes in financial estimates by financial analysts, or any failure by us to meet or exceed any of these estimates, or changes in the recommendations of any financial analysts that elect to follow our common shares or the shares of our competitors;
•announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts or acquisitions;
•future sales of our common shares; and
•investor perceptions of us and the industries in which we operate.
In addition, the equity markets in general have experienced substantial price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies affected. These broad market and
industry factors may materially harm the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of certain companies’ securities, securities class action litigation has been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Our exemption as a Luxembourg Company“foreign private issuer” from certain rules under the U.S. securities laws will result in less information about us being available to investors than for U.S. companies, which may result in our common shares being less attractive to investors.
As a “foreign private issuer” in the United States, we are exempt from certain rules under the U.S. securities laws and are permitted to file less information with the SEC than U.S. companies. As a “foreign private issuer,” we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that impose certain disclosure obligations and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors, and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our common shares. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as companies that are not “foreign private issuers” whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required to comply with Regulation FD promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to information they deem important, which may result in our common shares being less attractive to investors.
We are a Luxembourg corporation (“société anonyme”) and it may be difficult for you to obtain or enforce judgments against us or our executive officers and directors in the United States.
We are organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Most of our assets are located outside the United States. Furthermore, most of our directors and officers and experts reside outside the United States, and most of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, you may find it difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce judgments outside the United States obtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Likewise, it may also be difficult for you to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against us or these persons in courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. It may also be difficult for an investor to bring an action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us or these persons. Luxembourg law providesconfers to shareholders the right to bring a derivative action on our behalf of the Company only in limited circumstances and, subject to certain conditions, only admit,admits a shareholders’ right to bring a derivative action on behalf of the company.our behalf.
Service of process within Luxembourg upon the Company may be possible, provided that The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters of November 15, 1965 is complied with. As there is no treaty in force on the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the United States and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, courts in Luxembourg will not automatically recognize and enforce a final judgment rendered by a U.S. court. The enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments entered by U.S. courts will be subject prior to any enforcement in Luxembourg to the procedure and the conditions set forth in particular in the Luxembourg proceduralcivil procedure code and/or established by court interpretation, which conditions may include the following (subject to court interpretationand which may evolve):evolve:
•the judgment of the U.S. court is final and duly enforceable (exécutoire)(exécutoire) in the United States;
States and has not been fully enforced in the United States and/or any other jurisdiction;•the U.S. court had jurisdiction over the subject matter leading to the judgment (that is, its jurisdiction was established in compliance both with Luxembourg private international law rules and with(based on the applicable domestic U.S. federal or state jurisdictional rules)verification of a characterized link of connection of the litigation to the judge of origin);
•the U.S. court has applied to the dispute the substantive law which would have been applied by Luxembourg courts;
•the judgment was granted following proceedings where the counterparty had the opportunity to appear, and if it appeared, to present a defense;defense and other conditions for a fair trial have been complied with taking into account all facts and circumstances whether occurring before, during or after trial or issue and delivery of the judgment, and the judgment has not been obtained by reason of fraud;
•the U.S. court has acted in accordance with its own procedural laws; and
•the judgment of the U.S. court does not contravene Luxembourg international public policy.policy both substantive and procedural (as such term is interpreted under the laws of Luxembourg); and
•the absence of contradiction between such judgment and an already issued judgment of a Luxembourg court.
Under our articles of incorporation, we indemnify and hold our directors harmless against all claims and suits brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. Under our articles of incorporation, to the extent allowed or required by law, the rights and obligations among or between us, any of our current or former directors, officers and company employees and any current or former shareholder will be governed exclusively by the laws of Luxembourg and subject to the jurisdiction of the Luxembourg courts, unless such rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of their capacities as such. Although there is doubt as to whether U.S. courts would enforce such provision in an action brought in the United States under U.S. securities laws, such provision could make the enforcement of judgments obtained outside Luxembourg more difficult as to the enforcement against our assets in Luxembourg or jurisdictions that would apply Luxembourg law.
YouOur shareholders may have more difficulty protecting yourtheir interests than youthey would as a shareholdershareholders of a U.S. corporation.corporation, which could adversely impact trading in our common shares and our ability to conduct equity financings.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporationassociation and bythe laws of Luxembourg, including the laws governing joint stockpublic limited liability companies organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg as well as such other applicable local law, rules and regulations.(sociétés anonymes). The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of our directors and officers under Luxembourg law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act, and consequently, there may be less publicly available information about us than is regularly published by or about U.S. issuers. Also,In addition, Luxembourg regulationslaw governing the securities of Luxembourg companies may not be as extensive as those in effect in the United States, and Luxembourg law and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters may not be as protective of minority shareholders as state corporation laws in the United States. Therefore, youour shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting yourtheir interests in connection with actions taken by our directors and officers or our principal shareholders than youthey would as a shareholdershareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States.
Neither our articles of association nor Luxembourg law provide for appraisal rights for dissenting shareholders in certain extraordinary corporate transactions that may otherwise be available to shareholders under certain U.S. state laws. As a result of these differences, our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a U.S. issuer.
Luxembourg and European Union insolvency and bankruptcy laws and regulations are substantially different from U.S. insolvency laws and may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
As a company organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and with its registered office in Luxembourg, we are subject to Luxembourg and European Union insolvency and bankruptcy laws and regulations in the event any insolvency proceedings are initiated against us including, among other things, Council and European Parliament Regulation (EU)(E.U.) 2015/848 of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings (recast). Should courts in another European Union Member State determine that the insolvency and bankruptcy laws of that Member State apply to us (or to certain of our assets) in accordance with and subject to such European Union regulations, the courts in that Member State could have jurisdiction over the insolvency proceedings initiated against us. Insolvency and bankruptcy laws in Luxembourg or the relevant other European Union Member State, if any, may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws and make it more difficult for them to recover the amount they could expect to recover in a liquidation under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
You
Our ability to pay dividends is restricted under Luxembourg law.
Our articles of association and the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915, on commercial companies as amended from time to time (loi du 10 août 1915 sur les sociétés commerciales telle que modifiée), require a general shareholders’ meeting to approve any dividend distribution, except as set forth below.
Our ability to declare dividends under Luxembourg corporate law is subject to the availability of distributable earnings or available reserves, including share premium. Moreover, we may not be able to participate in equity offerings,declare and you may not receive any value for rights that we may grant.
Pursuant topay dividends more frequently than annually. As permitted by Luxembourg corporate law, existing shareholders are generally entitled to preemptive subscription rights in the event of capital increases and issues of shares against cash contributions. However, under our articles of incorporation,association authorize the boarddeclaration of directors has been authorized to waive, limit or suppressdividends more frequently than annually by the Board of Directors in the form of interim dividends so long as the amount of such preemptive subscription rights untilinterim
dividends does not exceed total net profits made since the fifth anniversaryend of the publicationlast financial year for which the annual accounts have been approved, plus any profits carried forward and sums drawn from reserves available for this purpose, less the aggregate of the authorization grantedprior financial year’s accumulated losses, the amounts to be set aside for the boardreserves required by Luxembourg law or by our articles of association for the prior financial year, and the estimated tax due on such earnings.
We are a holding company and depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in respectorder to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments, which they may not be able to do.
We are a holding company, and our subsidiaries conduct all of such waiver byour operations. We own no material assets other than the general meeting of shareholders. The current authorization was renewed by decision of the shareholder meeting heldequity interests in our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to make dividend payments depends on April 20, 2016our subsidiaries and is valid until April 20, 2021.their ability to distribute funds to us. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, we will be unable to distribute dividends. We do not intend to seek to obtain funds from other sources to pay dividends.
Item 4. Information on the Company
A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
General Information
Adecoagro was organized in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on June 11, 2010 as a société anonyme (a joint stock company). The Company’s legal name is “Adecoagro S.A.” On January 28, 2011, Adecoagro completed the IPO of its shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The shares are traded under the symbol “AGRO.” In a series of transactions during 2012, we transferred shares of Adecoagro to certain limited partners of IFH in exchange for their residual interest in IFH increasing our interest in IFH to approximately 100%.
On March 27, 2015, Adecoagro commenced a series of transactions for the purpose of transferingtransferring the domicile of its subsidiary, Adecoagro LP, to Luxembourg. In connection with the Adecoagro LP re-domiciliation, Adecoagro merged IFH into Adecoagro LP (Delaware) with Adecoagro LP (Delaware) as the surviving entity and on April 1, 2015 Adecoagro GP S.à r.l., a société à responsibilité limitée organized under the laws of Luxembourg, became hethe general partner of Adecoagro LP on April 1, 2015. Also on April 1, 2015, Adecoagro completed the re-domiciliation of Adecoagro LP (Delaware) out of Delaware to Luxembourg and Adecoagro LP without dissolution or liquidation, continued its corporate existence as Adecoagro LP S.C.S., a société comandite simple organized under Luxembourg law, effective April 2, 2015. For a detailed description of the Adecoagro LP redomiciliation please see “Corporate“—Corporate Development” below.
Adecoagro is registered with the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies under number B153681. Adecoagro has its registered office at 6, Rue Eugène Ruppert, L-2453, Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Our telephone number is (+352) 264491.
History
In September 2002, we commenced our operations with the acquisition of 100% of the equity interests of Pecom Agropecuaria S.A., an Argentine corporation (sociedad anónima), and we rapidly became one of the largest agricultural companies in Argentina. Totaling more than 74,000 hectares of farmland, this acquisition represented one of the largest stock purchase transactions in South America in 2002. In connection with the acquisition, Pecom Agropecuaria S.A. changed its name to Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. (“Adeco Agropecuaria”). Adeco Agropecuaria was the platform from which we executed our expansion plans, including the acquisition of additional land and the diversification of our business activities.
In 2004, we began our regional expansion and acquired a farm in Uruguay (approximately 5,086 hectares) and three farms in Western Bahia, Brazil (20,419 hectares). In 2005, we continued the expansion of our crop business in Argentina with the acquisitions of La Agraria S.A. (approximately 4,857 hectares) and Establecimientos El Orden S.A. and Cavok S.A. (approximately 15,157 hectares) and Las Horquetas farm (2,086 hectares).
In 2005, we acquired our first sugar and ethanol mill, Usina Monte Alegre S.A. (“UMA”), with a crushing capacitycapacity at that time of 0.9 million tons of sugarcane per year at thatthe time. UMA became our platform for expansion in the Brazilian sugarsugar and ethanol sector.
In 2006 and 2007, we continued our land portfolio expansion and vertical integration through the acquisitions of Pilagá S.A. (formerly Pilagá S.R.L. and before that, Pilagá S.A.G.), one of the largest and oldest agriculture companies in Argentina, with more than 88,000 hectares and two rice processing facilities, and one additional farm of approximately 2,400 hectares in Argentina and two farms of approximately 4,000 hectares in Brazil for the production of crops. Also, in December 2007, we acquired Bañado del Salado S.A., Agro Invest S.A. and Forsalta S.A., with more than 43,000 hectares for crop production in Argentina, and one farm in Uruguay of approximately 3,177 hectares.
During 2007, we also began the expansion of our dairy business in Argentina. After five years of research, we began the construction of athe first “free-stall” dairy facility with a capacity to milk 3,000 cows.
In Brazil, during 2007, we began the construction of a sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul with a projected 10.0 million tons of sugarcane crushing capacity. Angelica was the first greenfield mill we built from inception, with a nominal crushing capacity of 4.9 million tons. We also bought approximately 13,000 hectares of farmland for the planting of sugarcane to supply the mill. Angelica began operating during August 2008, and reached full operational capacity during April 2010.
Additionally, in August 2010, we acquired Dinaluca S.A., an agricultural company consisting of a farm located in the province of Corrientes, Argentina, and with more than 14,000 hectares for crop production in Argentina. Further, between August and November 2011, we acquired: (i) Compañía Agroforestal de Servicios y Mandatos S.A., an agricultural Argentine company owning more than 4,900 hectares of land in the province of Santiago del Estero, (ii) Simoneta S.A., an agricultural Argentine company owner ofowning more than 4,600 hectares of land in the province of La Pampa, and (iii) 3,400 hectares of land for crop production in the province of San Luis, Argentina.
During 2012, we began the construction of our second free stall dairy facility in Argentina, with a capacity of 3,500 milking cows.
On February 26, 2013, Adecoagro formed a 50/50 joint venture, CHS Agro S.A., together with CHS de Argentina S.A., a leading farmer-owned energy, grains and foods company based in the United States. CHS Agro built a sunflower processing facility located in the city of Pehuajo, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The facility processes blackoilblack oil and confectionary sunflower into specialty products such as in-shell seeds and oil seeds, which are exported entirely. The joint venture grows confectionary sunflower on leased farms, while blackoilblack oil sunflower is originated from third parties. On January 14, 2019 and after a restructuring of the joint venture, we purchased the remaining 50% of the capital stock of CHS Agro from CHS de Argentina S.A. Adecoagro currently owns 100% of CHS Agro S.A., which has since been renamed as Girasoles del Plata S.A. The consideration for this acquisition was nominal.
During March 2013, we began the construction of the second greenfield project in our sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul, the Ivinhema mill, with 5.7 million tons of sugarcane crushing capacity and located 45 km south of Angelica. This mill allowed us to consolidate our cluster, generate important synergies and economies of scale, and improve operational margins and Adjusted Free Cash Flow. The Ivinhema mill was built in two phases: the first phase with 2.0 million tons of capacity was completed during April 2012, and the second phase with 3.0 million tons of crushing capacity was completed in mid-2015.
During October 2017, we completed the construction of our first bio-digester. The facility generates electricity by burning biogas extracted from the effluents produced in our Diarydairy operations. On November 3, 2017, we began generating and delivering
1.4 MW of electricity to the local power grid. In addition to increasing revenues and securing our energy requirements, this facility enhances the sustainability of our free stall dairy operation by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving the effluent management and concentrating valuable nutrients, which are applied back to the fields.
On February 5, 2019 we acquired a peanut processing facility for $10 million. The facility is located in Dalmacio Vélez, Province of Cordoba, Argentina.
On February 8, 2019, we acquired two milk processing plants and two trademarks from SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitadas. One of the acquired facilities is located in the city of Chivilcoy, Province of Buenos Aires, and is primarily focused on fluid milk production for the domestic market in Argentina. The other acquired facility is located in the city of Morteros, Province of Cordoba, and produces dry milk and cheese for the export market. In addition, we acquired the intellectual property covering the brands “Las 3Tres Niñas” and “Angelita” and associated trademarks. Both brand names are well recognized in
Argentina and represent strong brands to market our retail consumer dairy products. The total consideration for this operationsoperation was US$47 million.
Corporate Development
On October 30, 2010, as part of a corporate reorganization, referred to herein as the Reorganization, AFI Ltd., a subsidiary of IFH LLC and the parent of Adecoagro LLC, distributed its interest in Adecoagro LLC to IFH LLC and commenced a process of dissolution, making IFH LLC the direct parent of Adecoagro LLC. Thereafter, our shareholders transferred pro rata 98% of their membership interests in IFH LLC to Adecoagro S.A. (a corporation organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg with no prior holdings or operations, formed for the purpose, among others, of facilitating our IPO) in exchange for 100% of the common shares of Adecoagro.
In connection with the Reorganization, Adecoagro converted IFH LLC from a limited liability company tointo IFH LP, a Delaware limited partnership.partnership owned 2% by our shareholders and, approximately 98% by Adecoagro, in each case as limited partners, and the remainder by Ona Ltd., a newly formed Maltese corporation, as its general partner. Adecoagro LLC was also converted to Adecoagro LP, a Delaware limited partnership, owned approximately 100% by IFH LP as limited partner, and the remainder by Toba Ltd., a newly formed Maltese corporation, as its general partner.
On January 28, 2011, we successfully completed ourthe initial public offering of our shares listed on the NYSE, and on February 2, 2011, we issued 28,405,925 shares, at a price of US$1111.00 per share. The shares trade under the symbol “AGRO.”
On February 2, 2011, we also issued and sold to Al Gharrafa Investment Company (“Al Gharrafa”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Qatar Holding LLC and one of our shareholders, 7,377,598 common shares at a purchase price of $10.65 per share, which is equal to the price per common share paid by the underwriters of our initial public offering of the Company, pursuant to an agreement entered into on January 6, 2011. In addition, on February 11, 2011, we issued 4,285,714 shares when the over-allotment option was exercised by the underwriters in our IPO.
During 2012, the Company issued in a series of transactions 1,654,752 shares to certain limited partners of IFH in exchange for their residual interest in IFH increasing Adecoagro’s interest in IFH to approximately 100%.
On February 5, 2013, we completed an underwritten secondary offering of 13.9 million common shares of Adecoagro offered by our shareholder, HBK Master Fund LP at a price per share to the public of $8.00 pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC. On February 13, 2013, HBK Master Fund LP sold an additional 2.1 million common shares of Adecoagro pursuant to the overallotment option it granted to the underwriter in the secondary offering.
On March 27, 2015, Adecoagro commenced a series of transactions for the purpose of transferring the domicile of its subsidiary, Adecoagro LP to Luxembourg. In connection with the redomiciliation of Adecoagro LP, Adecoagro merged IFH LP into Adecoagro LP with Adecoagro LP (Delaware) as the surviving entity. In connection with this merger, all of the assets and liabilities of IFH L.P. vested in Adecoagro LP (Delaware), Ona Ltd became its general partner and Toba Ltd became a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Adecoagro LP (Delaware). In connection with the transactions completed on March 27, 2015, Ona Ltd. assigned its general partnership interest in Adecoagro LP to Adecoagro GP S.a.r.l.S.à r.l., a société responsibilitie limiteeá responsibilité limitée organized under the laws of Luxembourg, on April 1, 2015. Also on April 1, 2015, Adecoagro completed the redomiciliation of Adecoagro LP (Delaware) out of Delaware to Luxembourg and Adecoagro LP, without dissolution or liquidation, continued its corporate existence as Adecoagro LP S.C.S., a société en comandite simple organized under Luxembourg law, effective April 2, 2015. Since that date the affairs of Adecoagro LP S.C.S. have been governed by its by-laws and Luxembourg law.
On March 21, 2016, we completed an underwritten secondary offering of 12.0 million shares of Adecoagro offered by our shareholders, Quantum Partner LP and Geosor Corporation, at a price per share to the public of $11.7 pursuant to an effective
shelf registration statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC. In connection with this offering, the selling shareholders granted the underwriter the right to purchase up to 1,800,000 additional common shares exercisable once at any time within 30 days after March 21,2016. On April 20, 2016, the underwriter elected to purchase an additional 350,000 common shares at a price of 11.40 per common share.
On September 21, 2017, the Company issued US$500 million principal amount of its 6.000% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”). The 2027 Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture dated as of September 21, 2017 (the “Indenture”), among us, as issuer, Adeco AgropecuariaS.A.Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.A., Adecoagro Brasil ParticipacoesParticipações S.A., Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. and Usina Monte Alegre Ltda., as guarantors (the “Guarantors”) and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, registrar, paying agent and transfer agent, and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Guarantors.
On December 5, 2019, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema , a wholywholly owned subsidiary of the Company, placed R$400.0 million in Certificados de Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA), due in November 2027 and bearing an interest at a rate of IPCA (Brazilian official inflation rate) + 3.80% per annum. This debt was issued with no guarantee.
The following chart summarizes our corporate structure as of April 2020.2021. The Restricted Subsidiaries and Unrestricted Subsidiaries shown on the chart refer to the terms Restricted Subsidiary"Restricted Subsidiary" and Unrestricted Subsidiary,"Unrestricted Subsidiary", respectively, as defined in our Senior Notes Indenture attached hereto as Exhibit 4.43.
Principal Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures totaled $256.9$213.0 million, $219.7$166.7 million and $199.6$256.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
For a discussion of our capital expenditures and future projections, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditure Commitments.”
B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW
COVID-19
Government measures in Argentina and Brazil
In light of the COVID8-19 pandemic outbreak, on March 20, 2020 the Argentine government implemented a social, preventive and mandatory isolation regime, prohibiting the circulation of people on routes, roads and public spaces (the “Mandatory Isolation Regime”). As of the date of this report, the activities pursued by our Argentine subsidiaries, related to agricultural production, distribution and commercialization, were exempted from the Mandatory Isolation Regime for being considered “essential” activities.
In order to guarantee the regular supply of essential products, the Argentine government established measures that, among others, obliged those who participate in the production, distribution and commercialization chain of certain products, for a 30-day period (renewable if necessary), to (i) sell them to their maximum prices as of March 6, 2020; and (ii) increase production to their full capacity and provide the proper measures to guarantee their transport and supply, and created (i) an informative regime for the purpose of publishing standard maximum prices of a basic listing of consumer products for each province (which will be available on the website www.preciosmaximos.produccion.gob.ar); and (ii) a public and free mechanism that allows the filing of claims and complaints by consumers and those included in the production, distribution and commercialization chain of the products included in the obligation to sell at maximum prices.
After the Argentine Supreme Court determined on March 17, 2020 the suspension of judicial terms until April 12, 2020, the Argentine Tax Court and the Argentine Federal Tax Authority (as well as other public agencies) followed the same criteria. During this period, all proceedings started against Customs or the Tax Authority will be suspended, though all procedural acts that could take place in this period will still be valid. Although the extraordinary term suspension affected all proceedings carried out under the Tax Procedural Law and the Customs Code, it did not affect the regular obligations of taxpayers or importers/exporters.
On March 20, 2020, the BCRA established an exceptional framework for banking and other foreign exchange institutions during the Mandatory Isolation Regime, including: i) closure of retail centers of financial and foreign exchange institutions; ii) services that must still be provided by financial institutions; iii) extension of maturities of bank financing; iv) suspension of electronic check clearing (which was later reinstated by means of Communique “A” 6944); v) remote operation of the exchange market; vi) continuity of wholesale exchange market and tenders of certain Central Bank bills called Leliq (Letras de Liquidez del Banco Central or “LELIQ”); vii) continuity of payment methods operations; and viii) remote operation of stock markets.
In Brazil, the government created a crisis committee to monitor the impact of COVID-19 in March 2020. Since then, it has announced several measures (tax and others) to address the effects of COVID-19. In this regard, the Brazilian health authorities, as well as several state and municipal authorities have adopted or recommended social distancing measures. Likewise, the Brazilian Congress is currently discussing several measures to increase the Brazilian government’s revenues, such as imposing new taxes, revoking tax benefits and increasing the rates of current taxes, including the following:
◦ creating a new tax as a Compulsory Loan (“Empréstimo Compulsório”) that would be imposed on companies whose net equity exceeds the amount to be established by law. A compulsory loan is a refundable federal tax that can be established in case of war or public calamity. The terms of this new tax are not yet clear, so we cannot predict the possible impacts on us; and
◦ revoke the tax exemption granted to dividend distributions paid by Brazilian companies, which could affect the return of our investments, as well as of our shareholders.
In Brazil, states and municipalities may also revoke tax benefits and/or increase the rates of current taxes to increase its revenues (See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors —Risks Related to Brazil- We receive certain tax benefits from Brazilian Tax Authorities which we cannot assure will be maintained or renewed.”)
In addition, the Brazilian Congress is currently discussing a Bill which, if approved will impose mandatory and temporary postponement of the terms of rural leases and terms on certain situations, preventing lessors from terminating such agreements and filing for repossession of the leased land.
Company measures
In order to guarantee the hygiene and safety conditions established by the Ministry of Health and to preserve the health of the employees in our subsidiaries, Adecoagro has enacted Prevention and Action Protocols tailored for each facility, in addition to constituting Crisis Committees. Measures taken include but are not limited to: (i) daily temperature check upon arrival to the facility, (ii) mandatory distancing in the workplace, (iii) maximum limit of people in the lunch room and vehicles (iv) sanitary barriers, (iv) special protective attire. Additionally, remote work has been guaranteed for the duration of the Mandatory Isolation Regime for employees based in central offices, and a rotation scheme has been implemented for administrative employees based in the farms or industrial facilities.
Most of our businesses are operating without any major disruption both at the farm and industry level as well as on the road and at the ports. However our Sugar & Ethanol business has been negatively affected by the economic turmoil unleashed by the spread of COVID-19 in Brazil, in addition to the collapse in the international price of oil. Demand for ethanol has dropped 60% since March as a consequence of the lockdown, and might continue if the lockdown persists (see“Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors —Risks Related to Our Business and Industries — Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are also closely correlated to the price of oil, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline in the price of oil will adversely affect our sugar and ethanol businesses" and "We may be exposed to risks related to health epidemics, and the COVID-19 in particular, that could adversely impact our ability to operate our business and results of operations").
OPEC Agreement
Oil prices collapsed in the past weeks with a record demand shock along with excess supply created by internal dispute among OPEC members. On March 9, 2020, a dispute between the Saudis and the Russians sparked an all-out price and market share war (the kingdom slashed the price of Arab Light crude and increased production to full capacity to almost 12.3 million barrels per day starting in April). In addition, the COVID-19 outbreak is generating unprecedented loss in demand for oil as billions of people across the globe are in quarantine, with the virus paralyzing air and ground travel and therefore collapsing fuel demand. This perfect storm caused oil prices to fall almost 50% as the supply glut gradually expanded and demand dropped approximately 27-30%. On April 12, 2020, the OPEC+ and G20 agreed on a round of production cuts for a total of approximately 9.7 million barrels per day from May 1, 2020 until June 30, 2020. Nonetheless, we believe that significant risks remain on the demand for oil, as the COVID-19 pandemic impact on demand could last longer than expected. A decrease in the price of oil will have a negative impact on the price of ethanol. (see “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business and Industries - Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are also closely correlated to the price of oil, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline in the price of oil will adversely affect our sugar and ethanol businesses").
Our Company
We are a leading agroindustrialagro-industrial company in South America, with operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. We are currently involved in a broad range of businesses, including farming crops and other agricultural products, dairy operations, sugar, ethanol and energy production and land transformation. Our sustainable business model is focused on (i) a low-cost production model that leverages growing or producing each of our agricultural products in regions where we believe we have
competitive advantages, (ii) reducing the volatility of our returns through product and geographic diversification and use of advanced technology, (iii) benefiting from vertical integration in key segments of the agro-industrial chain, (iv) acquiring and transforming land to improve its productivity and realizing land appreciation through strategic dispositions, and (v) implementing sustainable production practices and technologies focused on long-term profitability.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, we owned a total of 225,630219,850 hectares comprised of 19land comprising 18 farms in Argentina, 8eight farms in Brazil and 1one farm in Uruguay. In addition we own and operate several agro-industrial production facilities including three rice processing facilities and one rice snack facility in Argentina, threefour dairy free-stallsfree-stall facilities with 9,066an average of 13,597 milking cows andas of December 31, two milk processing facilities in Argentina, one peanut processing facility and one sunflower processing facility in Argentina, eleventwo grain handling and rice conditioning and storage plants in Argentina, and three sugar and ethanol mills in Brazil with a sugarcane crushing capacity of 14.2 million tons.
We believe that we are:
•one of the largest owners of productive farmland in South America, with more than 190,000184,000 owned and productive hectares as of December 31, 20192021 (excluding legal land reserves pursuant to local regulations and other land reserves) located in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, producing a wide range of agricultural products;
•a leading producer of grains and oilseeds in South America. During the 2018/20192020/2021 harvest year, we harvested 181,461217,828 hectares (including 86,307109,178 leased hectares and 31,12741,924 second crop hectares) and produced 652,169733,334 tons of grains, including soybeans, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower peanut and cotton, among others;
•one of the largest fully integrated producers of rough (unprocessed) rice in the world, planting 39,30844,282 hectares (including 1,7003,839 leased hectares) and producing 239,779346,685 tons during the 2018/192020/2021 harvest year, which accounted for 22%26% of the total Argentine production according to the Confederacion de Molinos Arroceros del Mercosur (“Conmasur”)or “Conmasur”. We are also a large processor and exporter of white rice (processed) in Argentina, accounting for 19% of total white rice production capacity in Argentina and 47%43% of total Argentine white rice exports during 2019 (33% of total paddyin 2021 (on a rough rice basis), according to Camara de Industriales Arroceros de Entre Ríos (Federacion de Entidades Arroceras);
•a leading dairy producer in South America in terms of our cutting-edge technology, productivity per cow and grain conversion efficiencies, producing 120.1173.1 million liters of raw milk during 2019,2021, and adding value in our processing facilities andfacilities. We are a leading retailer of dairy products, including twothree popular brands, “Lasbrands—Las Tres Niñas”as, Apóstoles and “Angelita.”Angelita;
•a growing producer of sugar and ethanol in Brazil, where we currently own three sugar and ethanol mills, with an aggregate installed capacity of 14.2 million tons per year and full cogeneration capacity (the(i.e. the generation of electricity from sugarcane bagasse, the fiber portion of sugarcane that remains after the extraction of sugarcane juice) of 232241 MW as of December 31, 2019.2021. Our operation is highly integrated, meaning that 96% of the sugarcane crushed at our mills is supplied from our own plantations. As of December 31, 2019,2021, our sugarcane plantation consisted of 166,041185,806 hectares; and
•one of the leading companies in South America involved in the acquisition and transformation of undermanaged land to more productive uses, generating higher cash yields. During the last thirteen fiscal years, weWe have consistently sold a portion of our fully mature farmland every year.during each of the last 15 fiscal years. In aggregate, we have sold close to 97,500102,913 hectares generating capital gains of approximately $240US$250 million.
We are engaged in three main businesses:
1.Farming Business:
As of December 31, 20192021 we owned 212,339206,896 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) of farmland in Argentina and Uruguay, of which 120,166 hectares are croppable, 14,054 hectares are being evaluated for transformation, 55,228 hectares are suitable for raising beef cattle and are mostly leased to third party cattle farmers, constituting a total of 189,448 productive hectares, and 36,183 hectares are legal land reserves pursuant to local regulations or other land reserves.Uruguay. During the 2018/20192020/2021 harvest year we held leases or have entered into agriculture partnerships for an additional 86,307 croppable hectares.109,178 hectares of arable land. We own the facilities and have the resources to store and condition 100% of our crop and rice production. We do not depend on third parties to condition our production for sale. Our farmingFarming business is subdivided into four main businesses:
Crop business•Crops: We produce a wide range of agricultural commodities, including soybeans,soybean, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower peanut and cotton, among others. In Argentina, our farming activities are primarily conducted mainly in the Argentine humid pampas region, where agro-ecological conditions are optimal for low-cost production. Since 2004, we have expanded our operations throughout the center-west region of Uruguay, and the western part of the state of Bahia, Brazil, as well as in the northern region of Argentina. During the 2018/20192020/2021 harvest year, we planted approximately 185,807217,828 hectares of crops, including second harvests, producing 649,108and
produced 733,334 tons of grains, including soybeans, wheat, corn, sunflower, cotton and peanut among others.grains. We also planted an additional 5,8285,337 hectares where we produced over 212,500300,782 tons of forage that we used for cowto feed cattle in our dairy operation. During the current 2019/202021/2022 harvest year, we planted approximately 194,518234,249 hectares of crops including(including second harvest,harvest) and also planted an additional 6,3389,784 hectares of forage. As part of the crops business, in 2019 we completed the acquisition of one peanut processing facility which produces raw and blanched peanut mostly sold in the export market; and we became full owners of one sunflower processing facility producing confectionary and bakery sunflower.
•Rice business: We own a fully-integratedfully integrated rice operation in Argentina. We produce irrigated rice in the northeast provinces of Argentina, where the availability of water, sunlight, and fertile soil results in onea coveted region for the low-cost production of the most ideal regions in the world for producing rice at low cost.rice. We believe that we are one of the largest producers of rough (unprocessed) rice in Argentina, producing 239,779346,685 tons during the 2018/20192020/2021 harvest year, which accounted for 22%26% of the total Argentine production according to Conmasur.Conmasur We own three rice mills that process our own production, as well as rice purchased from third parties. We produce different types of white and brown rice that are sold both in the domestic Argentine retail market under our own brand;brands and exported.abroad. During the current 2019/202021/2022 harvest year, we planted 41,54449,040 hectares of rice.
•Dairy business: We believe that we are a leading dairy producer in South America in terms of our utilization of cutting-edge technology and in our productivity per cow and grain conversion efficiencies.efficiency. Through the production of raw milk, we are able to transform forage and grains into value-added animal protein. Our free-stall dairies in Argentina allow us to optimize our use of resources (land, dairy cow feedfeeding cattle and capital), increase our productivity and maximize the conversion of forage and grain into raw milk. We produced 120.1173.1 million liters of raw milk during 2019,in 2021, with a daily average of 9,06612,942 milking cows, delivering an average of 36.336.7 liters of milk per cow per day. OnIn October 2017, we completed the construction of our first bio-digestorbiodigester with 1.4MWH1.4 MWh of installed capacity. The facility generates electricity by burning biogas extracted from the effluents produced by our milking cows. In addition to increasing revenues and securing our energy requirements, this facility enhances the sustainability of our free-stall dairy operation by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving the effluent management of effluents and concentrating valuable nutrients which are applied back to the fields. In 2019, we further acquired two milk processing facilities whichthat produce UHT and UP milk, milk powder, and semi-hard cheese, yogurt and chocolate milk, among other products, with the flexibility to sell intoto both the domestic and export market based on relative profitability. During 2019In 2021, our facilities produced 69processed 352.5 million liters of milk, thereby producing 101 million liters of fluid milk, over 1,5002,900 tons of semi-hard cheese, and over 7,70018,000 tons of milk powder.
powder and over four million liters of cream and cocoa flavored milk.
•All Other Segments business: Our allAll other segments business primarily consists of leasing pasture land to cattle farmers in Argentina. We lease over 13,54614,935 hectares of pasture land which is not suitableunsuitable for crop production to third partythird-party cattle farmers.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data relating to our farming business:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Sales | | (in thousands of $) |
| Crops (1) | | 166,446 |
| | 155,418 |
| | 197,222 |
|
| Rice (2) | | 101,156 |
| | 95,403 |
| | 86,478 |
|
| Dairy | | 83,822 |
| | 29,710 |
| | 37,523 |
|
| All Other Segments (3) | | 3,931 |
| | 1,770 |
| | 1,336 |
|
| Total | | 355,355 |
| | 282,301 |
| | 322,561 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest year |
| | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 |
| Production | | (in tons) |
| Crops (tons) (4) | | 652,169 |
| | 685,657 |
| | 652,201 |
|
| Rice (tons) (5) | | 239,779 |
| | 276,693 |
| | 234,831 |
|
| Total | | 891,948 |
| | 962,350 |
| | 887,032 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31 |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Dairy (thousands of liters) (6) | | 120,069 |
| | 101,300 |
| | 93,168 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest year |
| | | 2019/20 | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 |
| Planted Area | | (in hectares, including second harvest) |
| Crops (7) | | 194,518 |
| | 191,635 |
| | 192,438 |
| | 190,325 |
|
| Rice | | 41,544 |
| | 39,308 |
| | 40,289 |
| | 39,728 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes soybeans, corn, wheat, sunflower and cotton, among others. |
| |
(2) | Sales of processed rice, including rough rice purchased from third parties and processed in our facilities. |
| |
(3) | All Other Segments encompasses our remaining interests in the beef Cattle and Coffee businesses. Our beef cattle business consists of over 55 thousand hectares of pasture land that is not suitable for crop production and as a result is leased to third parties for cattle grazing activities. |
| |
(4) | Crop production does not include 212,650 tons, 120,221tons and 155,300 tons, of forage produced in the 2018/2019, 2017/2018 and 2016/2017 harvest years, respectively.
|
| |
(5) | Expressed in tons of rough rice produced on owned and leased farms. As of December 31, 2019, the 2019/20 harvest year of rice harvest had not begun.
|
| |
(6) | Raw milk produced at our dairy farms. |
| |
(7) | Includes 5,828 hectares, 6,010 hectares, and 5,177 hectares, used for the production of forage during the 2018/2019, 2017/2018 and 2016/2017 harvest years, respectively.
|
2. Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business:
We cultivate and harvest sugarcane, thatwhich is then processed in our own mills to produce sugar, ethanol and energy. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had 185,806 hectares of sugarcane plantations in the Brazilian states of Mato Grosso do Sul and Minas Gerais, of which 10,617 hectares were planted on our totalown land and 175,189 hectares were planted on land leased by us under long-term agreements. We use different techniques to maximize sugarcane production. For example, we use meiosis to renew and expand harvestable areas by planting only a few rows of sugarcane, along with other products in the rest of the field. We harvest the sugarcane within six to nine months and use that production to plant sugarcane on the area where other products have been already harvested. By doing so, we maximize sugarcane plantation consisted of 166,041 hectares, planted over both owned and leased land. Weefficiency.
Further, we currently own and operate three sugar and ethanol mills, mills—UMA, Angélica and Ivinhema, Ivinhema—with a total crushing capacity of 14.2(1) million tons of sugarcane per year as of December 31, 2019. 2021 (assuming an average of 5,569 milling hours).
UMA is a small but efficient mill located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, with a sugarcane crushing capacity of 1.2(2) million tons per year (assuming an average of 4,800 milling hours), full cogeneration capacity and an associated sugar brand, Açúcar Monte Alegre,with a strong presence in the regional retail market (Açúcar Monte Alegre).market. We plant and harvest 99.7%98.5% of the sugarcane milled at UMA, with the remaining 0.3%1.5% acquired from third parties. UMA is also engaged in the production of organic sugar and in 2020, it exported product for the first time after having received the necessary certification to export organic sugar to the E.U. Angélica and Ivinhema are two new, modern mills, which we built in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, with current sugarcane crushing capacities of 5.6(3) and 7.4(4) million tons per year, respectively.respectively (assuming an average of 5,333 and 5,920 milling hours, respectively). Both mills are located 45 kmkilometers apart, and form a cluster surrounded by one large sugarcane plantation. Angelica and Ivinhema are equipped with high pressurehigh-pressure steam boilers and turbo-generators with the capacity to use all the sugarcane bagasse by-product to generate electricity. Approximately 28%32% of the electricity generated is used to power the mill and the excess electricity is sold to the local power grid, resulting in thewhich means our mills havinghave full cogeneration capacity.
ForIn the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, we crushed 10.810.9 million tons of sugarcane. Our mills produce both sugar and ethanol, and accordingly, we have some flexibility to adjust our production (within certain capacity limits that generally vary between 40% and 80%) between sugar and ethanol, to take advantage of more favorable market demand and prices at given points in time. ForIn the year ended December 31, 20192021 we produced 213,256546,819 tons of sugar and 756,494534,603 cubic meters of ethanol.
In 2020 we began to sell carbon credits or “CBios” under the RenovaBio program. The RenovaBio program is designed by the Brazilian government to cut carbon emissions by discouraging fossil fuel consumption while encouraging the production of December 31, 2019, our overall sugarcane plantation consistedrenewable energy. Under this program, a carbon credit market is established in which sellers of 166,041 hectaresfossil fuels have to acquire a mandatory quota of sugarcanecarbon credits set based on the amount of non-renewable fuels sold by them in the statesprior year. Issuers of Mato Grosso do SulCBios are biofuel producers whose mills have been certified by the ANP and Minas Gerais, Brazil,awarded a score based on how “green” their mill operation is. This score acts as a multiplier for the amount of which 13,291 hectaresCBios the mill can issue for every cubic meter of sugarcane were plantedethanol it sells. CBios, in turn, are financial instruments traded on owned land,the B3. Prices are based on the supply of and 152,750 hectares were planted on land leased from third parties under long term agreements.
(1) Assumingdemand for those credits. In 2021, we sold 504,000 CBios at an average unit price of 5,569 hoursR$41.20 (average net price of US$7.30).
(2) Assuming an average of 4,800 hours
(3) Assuming an average of 5,333 hours
(4) Assuming an average of 5,920 hours
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data relating to our sugar, ethanol and energy business:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Sales | | (in thousands of $) |
| Sugar | | 97,710 |
| | 128,377 |
| | 305,688 |
|
| Ethanol | | 373,847 |
| | 324,661 |
| | 241,650 |
|
| Energy | | 59,652 |
| | 57,797 |
| | 62,218 |
|
| Other | | 574 |
| | 103 |
| | 1,063 |
|
| Total | | 531,783 |
| | 510,938 |
| | 610,619 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Production | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Sugar (tons) | | 213,256 |
| | 344,137 |
| | 567,068 |
|
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 756,494 |
| | 675,001 |
| | 434,015 |
|
| Energy (MWh exported) | | 853,139 |
| | 705,539 |
| | 712,425 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Other Metrics | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Sugarcane milled (% owned) | | 96 | % | | 95 | % | | 89 | % |
| Sugarcane crushing capacity (millions of tons) | | 14.2 |
| | 12.3 |
| | 12.3 |
|
| % Mechanized harvesting operations - Consolidated | | 98 | % | | 99 | % | | 98 | % |
| % Mechanized harvesting operations - Cluster | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
3. Land Transformation Business:Business
We acquire farmlandsfarmland that we believe areis undeveloped or underutilized and, byunderutilized. By implementing cutting-edge production technology and agricultural best practices, transform thewe render this land to be suitable for more productive uses, enhance yields and increase the value of the land. During the seventeen-year period since our inception, we have effectively put into production 171,000 hectares of land that were previously undeveloped or undermanaged. During 2019, we continued the transformation process of over 132,936 hectares we own. We realize and capture land transformation value through the strategic disposition of assets that have reached full development potential. We believe that the rotation of our land portfolio allows us to re-allocate capital efficiently, maximizing our return on invested capital. Our current owned land portfolio consists of 225,630 hectares, distributed throughout our operating regions as follows: 93% in Argentina, 6% in Brazil, and 1% in Uruguay. During the last thirteen years, we sold 23 of our fully mature farms, generating capital gains of approximately $240 million.
its overall value. We promote sustainable land use through our land transformation activities, which seek to promote environmentally responsible agricultural production and a balance between production and ecosystem preservation. We do not operate in heavily wooded areas or wetland areas.
FromMoreover, from time to time, the company seekswe seek to recycle itsour capital by disposing ofselling a portion of its fully developed farms. This allows the companyus to monetize the capital gains generated by its land transformation activities and allocate itsour capital to acquire land with higher transformation potential or to deploy it in other businesses, thereby enhancing the return on invested capital. Please see also ““Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors —Risks RelatedDuring the 19-year period since our inception, we have effectively put into production over 171,000 hectares of land that were previously undeveloped or undermanaged. We realize and capture land transformation value through the strategic disposition of assets that have reached full development potential. We believe that the rotation of our land portfolio allows us to efficiently reallocate capital and maximize our return on invested capital. Our current land portfolio consists of 219,850 hectares (net of minority interests) distributed throughout our operating regions as follows: 93% in Argentina, — Recent Changes6% in Argentine law concerning foreign ownershipBrazil, and 1% in Uruguay. During the last 15 years, we sold 25 of rural properties may adversely affect our resultsfully mature farms, generating capital gains of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “-Risks Related to Brazil- Recent changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.”approximately US$250 million.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data relating to our land transformation business:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Undeveloped/Undermanaged land put into production (hectares) | | — |
| | 508 |
| | 1,065 |
|
| Ongoing transformation of croppable land (hectares) | | 132,936 |
| | 132,936 |
| | 132,428 |
|
| Number of farm sold | | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
|
| Hectares sold | | 6,082 |
| | 9,300 |
| | — |
|
Capital gains from the sale of land ($ thousands) (1) | | 9,376 |
| | 36,227 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Undeveloped/undermanaged land put into production (hectares) | | — | | 1,903 | | — |
| Ongoing transformation of arable land (hectares) | | 123,313 | | 123,313 | | 126,854 |
Number of farm sold (1) | | — | | 2 | | 1 |
Hectares sold (2) | | — | | 5,444 | | 6,082 |
Capital gains from the sale of land (in thousands of US$) (1) | | — | | 1,500 | | 9,376 |
(1) In 2020, we sold the Huelen farm (amounting to 4,633 hectares) and a 811 hectares plot of the Abolengo farm.
(2) Includes the sale of non-controlling interests in farmland companiescompanies.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe the following are our competitive strengths:
•Unique and strategic asset base. We own strategically located farmland and agro-industrial assets in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. We engage in continuous improvement ofcontinuously improve our operations and practices, resulting in the reduction of operating costs and an increase in productivity and ultimately enhancing the value of our properties and generating capital gains. Our operations also benefit from strategically located industrial facilities throughout Argentina and Brazil, increasing operating efficiencies and reducing operating and logistical costs. We are vertically integrated where economics and returns are attractive, where the efficiency of our primary operation is significantly enhanced, or where lack of a competitive market results in the absence of a transparent price determination mechanism. Our diversified asset base creates valuable synergies and economies of scale, including (i) the ability to transfer the technologies and best practices that we have developed across our business lines, (ii) the ability to apply value-adding land transformation strategies to farmland in connection with our farming and sugarcane operations, and (iii) a greater ability to negotiate more favorable terms with our suppliers and customers.
Owning a significant portion of the land on which we operate is a key element of our business model.
•Low-cost production leveraging agro-ecological competitive advantages. Each of the commodity products we grow is produced in regions where agro-ecological conditions provide competitive advantages and which, through the implementation of our efficient and sustainable production model, allow us to become one of the lowest cost producers.
•Our grain and oilseed production is based in the humid Argentine humid pampas region, where soil fertility, regular rainfalls, temperate climate, the availability of land and the relative proximity to ports contribute to the reduced use of fertilizers and agrochemicals, high productivity and stable yields and efficient logistics, ultimately resulting in one of the lowest costs per ton of grain produced and delivered.
•Our rice operation is located in the northeast provinces of Argentina, one of the best rice farming regions in the world due to plentiful sunlight, the abundant availability of water for low costlow-cost irrigation, and a large potential for expansion.
•Our dairy operation is situated in the humid Argentine humid pampas region, where cow feed (grains, oilseeds and forage) is efficiently and abundantly produced at a low cost and climate and sanitary conditions are optimal for cow comfort, which enhances productivity, cow reproduction rates and milk quality. Additionally we recently acquired two milk processing facilities strategically located. Our Morteros facility is located in the northeast of Córdoba province, an important milk production basin in Argentina. Our Chivilcoy facility is situated north of Buenos Aires province, approximately 250km away from Adecoagro’s freestalls and 160 km from Buenos Aires, the country’s main consumption market.
•We produce sugarcane in the center-south regionstates of Mato Grosso do Sul and Minas Gerais in Brazil, where the combination of soil and climate result in high sugarcane productivity and quality, resulting in one of the lowest production costs in the world significantly(significantly lower than other major sugar producing regions, including India, China, the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany.Germany).
•Standardized and scalable agribusiness model applying technologicalinnovation. We have consistently used innovative production techniques to ensure that we are at the forefront of technological improvements and environmental sustainability standards in our industry. We are implementing an agribusiness model that consists of specializing our workforce and defining standard protocols to track crop development and control production variables, thereby enhancing management decision-making. We further optimize our agribusiness model through the effective implementation and constant adaptation of a portfolio of advanced agricultural and information technologies and best practices tailored to each region in which we operate and commodity we produce, allowing us to improve our crop yields, reduce operating costs and maximize margins in a sustainable manner.
•In our farmingFarming business, we use “no-till” technology as the cornerstone of production in our crop productionCrops segment and have been able to implement this technique in areas within our production regions where it hadwas not been used before.previously used. Furthermore, we also utilize crop rotation, second harvests, integrated pest management, balanced fertilization, water management and mechanization. Additionally, we use the innovative silo bag storage method, utilizing large polyethylene bags with a capacity of 180-200180 to 200 tons which can be left on the field for 12 months, resulting in low-cost, scalable and flexible storage on the field during harvest, which we believe allows us to expand our crop storage capacity at a low cost, generate important logistic and freight savings by moving our production in the off-season when freight fares are lower, and time the entry of our production into the market at optimal price points. See “ —“—Operations and Principal Activities-Farming-StorageActivities—Farming—Storage and Conditioning.”
•In our dairy business,Dairy segment, we believe that we were the first company in South America to implement the “free-stall” production system, resulting in more efficient conversion of feed to raw milk and higher production rates per cow compared to our peers in the region.
•In our sugar, ethanolSugar, Ethanol and energy business,Energy segment, our sugarcane cluster, constituted bycomposed of the Ivinhema and Angélica millsmills: (i) has a highly mechanized planting and harvesting operation, which has increased our sugarcane production, reduced our operating costs and contributed to environmental sustainability by eliminating the need to burn the sugarcane before harvest; (ii) has the capacity to use all the bagasse (a by-product of the sugar and ethanol production process) that is produced, with almost no incremental cost, to cogenerate 216225 MW y of clean and renewable energy; (iii) has the capacity of processing 55,200(iii) can process 54,480 tons of sugarcane per day and (iv) has the ability tocan recycle by-products such as filter cake and vinasse, by using them as fertilizers in our sugarcane fields, as well as recycling water and other effluents, generating important savings in input costs and protecting the environment.
•Unique diversification model to mitigate cash flow volatility. We pursue a unique, multi-tier diversification strategy to reduce our exposure to production and market fluctuations that may impact our cash flow and operating results. We seek geographic diversification by spreading our portfolio of farmland and agro-industrial assets across different regions of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, thereby lowering our risk exposure to weather-related losses and contributing to stable
cash flows. Additionally, we produce a variety of products including soybeans, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower, cotton, barley, sorghum, rice, raw milk, sugar, ethanol and energy, which lowers our risk exposure to potentially depressed market conditions of any specific product. Moreover, through vertical integration in the rice, dairy, sugar, ethanolRice, Dairy and energythe Sugar, Ethanol and Energy businesses, we process and transform a portion of our agricultural commodities into branded retail products, reducing our commodity price risk and our reliance on the standard market distribution channels for unprocessed products. Finally, our commercial committee defines our commercial policies based on market fundamentals and the consideration of logistical and production data to develop a customized sale/hedge risk management strategy for each product.
•Expertise in acquiring farmland with transformation and appreciation potential. Since our inception in 2002, we have executed transactions for the purchase and disposition of land for over $740US$780 million and sold close to 97,500over 100,000 hectares of developed land, generating capital gains of approximately $240US$250 million. We believe we have a superior track record and have positioned ourselves as a key player in the land business in South America. Our business development team has gained extensive expertise in evaluating and acquiring farmland throughout South America and has a solid understanding of the productivity potential of each region and of the potential for land transformation and appreciation. To date, we have analyzed over 11 million hectares of farmland spread throughout the regions in which we operate and other productive regions in the world. We have developed a methodology to assess farmland and to appraise its potential value with a high degree of accuracy and efficiency by using information generated through sophisticated technology, including satellite images, rain and temperature records, soil analyses, and topography and drainage maps. Our management team has gained extensive experience in transforming and maximizing the appreciation potential of our land portfolio through the implementation of our agribusiness techniques described above. We also have an extensive track record of rotating our asset portfolio to generate capital gains and monetize the transformation and appreciation generated through our land transformation activities and agricultural operations.
•Experienced management team and knowledgeable employees. Our peoplepersonnel are our most important asset. We have an experienced senior management team with an average of more than 20 years of experience working in our sector and a solid track record of implementing and executing large scalelarge-scale growth projects, such as land transformations, greenfield developments of industrial plants, and integrating acquisitions within our organization. Recruiting technically qualified employees at each of our farms and operating sites is a main focus of our senior management and a key to our success.
Our Business Strategy
We intend to maintain our position as a leading agricultural company in South America by expanding and consolidating each of our business lines, creating value for our shareholders. The key elements of our business strategy are:are as follows:
•Expand our farmingFarming business through organic growth, leasing andstrategic acquisitions. We will continue to seek opportunities for organic growth, target attractive acquisition and leasing opportunities and strive to maximize operating synergies and achieve economies of scale in each of our three main farmingFarming business areas (crops, rice and dairy). We believe that the execution risk associated with these projects iswill not expected to be significant as we are investing in existing operations that are highly efficient. AlsoMoreover, our expected results do not rely exclusively on rising commodity prices, which we expect to remain constant at current levels.
flat.
◦Dairy business: Free-stall #4•Crops: In February 2019, we acquired a state-of-the-art peanut processing facility strategically located in Córdoba province, Argentina’s largest peanut production area. This plant is currently under constructionequipped with high-performance equipment and we are completing the populationcomprises a shelling plant, a blanching plant and a seed treatment plant. It has a shelling capacity of free-stall #3. As80,000 tons per year, a blanching capacity of the day36,000 tons per year, and a storage capacity of this report, we are operating at 85%50,000 tons of total capacity, targeting operations at full capacityin-shell peanuts (which will increase to 67,000 by the end of 2020.2022). Moreover, we recently expanded our finished products storage capacity from 7,500 tons to 10,000 tons (4,200 of which are under cold storage). The plant also has a drying capacity of 1,200 tons (at a 14% input moisture). The plant has been granted all necessary certifications and permits, which allow us to satisfy demand in selective global markets that pay a premium for Argentine peanut because of its superior quality. Our increased focus in the segment will allow us to reduce costs by (i) saving in tolling and brokerage fees, (ii) consolidating and exporting our production from our on-site customs, (iii) reducing operational risks and (iv) having access to land at competitive prices by managing crop rotation ourselves, among others.
•Rice: We are advancing wellcompleted investments in the segment that have enabled us to increase productivity at the farm level, improve our rice processing and distribution capabilities, and increase the value of main by-products. Some of our investments in this segment include: (i) the implementation of zero-level technology in over 30,000 hectares, which has considerably reduced water consumption at the farm, and increased yields by providing better germination, uniform irrigation and lower losses during harvest; (ii) the increased use of our own machinery for planting and harvesting activities, which has allowed us to seek optimal harvest timing; and (iii) the installation of an on-site dryer at our Oscuro farm, which added efficiency to our grain storage and handling and reduced transportation and other costs. At the industrial level, we constructed a parboil plant that has allowed us to increase our processing volume and produce a higher-margin product.
•Dairy: As of December 2021, we had four fully operative free-stall facilities with an occupancy of 13,742 cows. We continue with our strategy of growing and securing corn silage to feed additional cows. As for the bio-digester, we already stabilizedbiodigester, energy production is stabilized and generating attractive results.
Additionally, onsince February 2019 we completed the acquisitionare owners of two milk processing facilities acquired from SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitadas. Both plants are well equipped and strategically located. The facility located in the city of Morteros, Province of Cordoba,Córdoba, is at the center of Argentina´sArgentina’s largest dairy basin and has a total processing capacity of 850840 thousand liters per day aimed at producing powderpowdered milk and cheese, formainly destined to the export market. The facility located in Chivilcoy, Provincein the province of Buenos Aires, is halfway between our dairy free-stallsfree-stall facilities and the Citycity of Buenos Aires, the largest fluid dairy market. The total processing capacity of this facility is 925 thousand555.000 liters per day aimed at producing mostly fluid milk. (See " – Our Company)." These acquisitions are part of our long term growth strategy, consistent with our strategy for our crops, rice, sugar, ethanol, and energy businesses. We believe that being vertically integrated has allowedallows us to control the supply chain, which has in turn enhancedenhances efficiencies and increased margins. Also, this transactionincreases margins, and provides us with the flexibility to sell into the export and domestic markets, based on relative profitability with a view to generate attractive returns.
◦Rice business: We completed investments in the segment, allowing us to improve our rice processing and distribution capabilities, and increase the value of main by-products.
◦Crops: On February 2019 we seized the opportunity to vertically integrate our peanuts operations through the acquisition of a state-of-the-art peanut processing facility located in the province of Córdoba, Argentina. The plant is equipped with high-performance equipment allowing it to operate at a shelling capacity of 80 thousand tons per year (380 tons per day), a blanching capacity of 115 tons per day, a storage capacity of 60 thousand tons of inshell and 7 thousand tons of finished product (4 thousand of which are under cold storage), and it has a drying capacity of 1,250 tons per day (at a 14% input moisture). The plant has been granted all the necessary certifications and permits allowing us to satisfy demand in selective global markets which pay a premium for Argentine peanut because of its superior quality. Our increased focus in the segment, along with the plant acquisition will allow us to reduce costs by (i) saving in tolling and brokerage fees, (ii) consolidating and exporting our production from our on-site customs, and (iii) having access to land at competitive prices by managing crop rotation ourselves, among others.
•Consolidate our sugar and ethanol cluster in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.Sul. Our main strategy for our sugar and ethanol business is to consolidate our cluster in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul in Brazil by ramping up production inat our Ivinhema and Angelica mills, which as of December 2019 reachedhave a nominal capacity of 14.213 million tons per year. See “ —Operations and Principal Activities—Sugar, Ethanol and Energy-OurEnergy—Our Mills.” The consolidation of the cluster will generatehas generated important synergies, operating efficiencies and economies of scale such as (i) a reduction in the average distance from the sugarcane fields to the mills, generating important savings in sugarcane transportation expenses; (ii) onea single centralized management team, reducing total administration cost per ton of sugarcane milled; and (iii) a large sugarcane plantation supplying two mills, allowing forwhich permits non-stop harvesting. We believe that ourOur sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul will allowhas allowed us to become one of the most efficient and low
cost producers of sugar, ethanol and energy in Brazil. Additionally, we plan to continue to monitor closely the Brazilian sugar and ethanol industries and may pursue selective acquisitions that provide opportunities to increase our economies of scale, operating synergies and profitability.
After reaching full capacity, our operating teams have beenWe remain focused on finding ways to continue maximizing efficiency and generating additional synergies and cost dilution. In this process, our operating teams have identified certain bottlenecks in our industrial operations that may bewere removed with minimal investments which will allowand allowed us to increase crushing volumes per hour and total capacity per year. We are engaged in an organic growth project to increase the nominal crushingIn 2021, we inaugurated a molecular sieve at our Ivinhema mill, which increased our ethanol dehydration capacity by 30%50%. The project consistsPrior to this investment, the only mill capable of two phases:producing anhydrous ethanol was the Angelica mill. This increase in our dehydration capacity is as a commercial tool that enhances the efficiency and sustainability of our operations and increases our production flexibility. Combined with our high ethanol storage capacity, it enables us to carry over stocks and places us in a solid position to benefit from higher expected prices.
- Phase 1 is complete. It consisted in expanding Angelica’s crushing capacity by 0.9 million tons. Crushing capacity was expanded by 150 tons/hour by installing larger mill rollers in the first mill, and expanding the sugar centrifugation and ethanol filtration processes.
- Phase 2 is complete. It consisted in expanding Ivinhema’s capacity by 2.1 million tons (400 tons/hour), and it was finished during 2019. This was achieved by installing a new mill (#6) expanding the sugarcane reception, juice treatment and sugar factory. Crushing will grow gradually and reach full capacity in 2023.
•Further increase our operating efficiencies while maintaining a diversified portfolio. We intend to continue to focus on improving the efficiency of our operations and maintaining a low-cost structure to increase our profitability and protect our cash flows from commodity price cycle risk. We seek to maintain our low-cost platform by (i) making additional investments in advanced technologies, including those related to agricultural, industrial and logistical processes and information technology, (ii) improving our economies of scale through organic growth, strategic acquisitions, and more efficient production methods, and (iii) fully utilizing our resources to increase our production margins. In addition, we intend to mitigate commodity price cycle risk and minimize our exposure to weather related losses by (i)(a) maintaining a diversified product mix and vertically integrating production of certain commodities and (ii)(b) geographically diversifying the locations of our farms.
•Continue to implement our land transformation strategy. We plan to continue to enhance the value of our owned farmland and future land acquisitions by making them suitable for more profitable agricultural activities, thereby seeking to maximize the return on our invested capital in our land assets. In addition, we expect to continue rotating our land
portfolio through strategic dispositions of certain properties in order to realize and monetize the transformation and appreciation value created by our land transformation activities. We also plan to leverage our knowledge and experience in land asset- management to identify superior buying and selling opportunities.
Operations and Principal Activities
Farming Business
Our Farming business line is divided into three main reportable operating businesses, namely crops, ricebusinesses: Crops, Rice and dairy.Dairy. We conduct our farmingFarming operations primarily on our own land and to a lesser extent, on land leased from third parties. During the 2020/2021harvest year, 2018/2019our farmingFarming operations were conducted on a total of 220,769262,110 hectares of land; of this land, 111,009 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) were owned by us, 41,924 hectares were second harvest areas, and 109,178 hectares were leased. During the 2019/2020 harvest year, our Farming operations were conducted on 237,806 hectares of whichland; of this land, 105,883 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) were owned by us, 34,556 were second harvest areas, and 97,367 hectares were leased. During the 2018/2019 harvest year, we ownconducted our Farming operations on 225,115 hectares of land; of this, 107,681 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms), 26,781 were owned by us, 31,127 were second harvest areas, and 86,307 hectares were second crop area, and we leased the remaining 86,307 hectares from third parties. leased.
The following table sets forth our production volumes for each of our farming business lines.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Harvest Year |
| | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| Production | | (in tons) |
| Crops (tons) (1) | | 733,334 | | | 720,059 | | | 652,169 | |
| Rice (tons) (2) | | 346,685 | | | 278,348 | | | 239,779 | |
| Total | | 1,080,019 | | | 998,407 | | | 891,948 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 |
| Production | | (in tons) |
| Crops (tons) (1) | | 652,169 |
| | 685,657 |
| | 652,201 |
|
| Rice (tons) (2) | | 239,779 |
| | 276,693 |
| | 234,831 |
|
| Total | | 891,948 |
| | 962,350 |
| | 887,032 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Dairy (thousands of liters)(3) | | 120,069 |
| | 101,300 |
| | 93,168 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Dairy (thousands of liters)(3) | | 173,148 | | | 145,192 | | | 120,069 | |
| |
(1) | As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of soybean, corn, sunflower, cotton and rice pertaining to the 2018/2019 harvest year is ongoing. The only crop which has been almost fully harvested in the current 2019/20 harvest year is wheat, with a total production of 71,644 tons. Crop production does not include 212,650 tons, 120,221tons and 155,300 tons, of forage produced in the 2018/2019, 2017/2018 and 2016/2017 harvest years, respectively.
|
| |
(2) | Expressed in tons of rough rice. |
(1) Crop production does not include 300,782 tons, 226,821 tons, and 212,650 tons of forage produced in the 2020/2021, 2019/2020 and 2018/2019 harvest years, respectively. It also does not include the soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
(2) Expressed in tons of rough rice.
(3) Raw milk produced.
Crops Business (Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton)
Our agricultural production is mainly based on planting, growing and harvesting crops over our owned croppablearable area. During the 2018/20192020/2021 harvest year, we planted crops over a total area ofon approximately 191,635223,165 hectares, including our owned land, leased land leased from third parties and hectares planted in second harvests. During mid 2019harvest areas. In mid-2021, we began the planting of crops pertaining tofor the 2019/20202021/2022 harvest year, which will bewas concluded duringin the first quarter of 2020,2022, with a total planted area of 196,950244,033 hectares of which so far we have planted 194,518.(including forage). Our main products include soybean, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower peanut and cotton. Other products, such as sorghum and barley, among others, are sown occasionally and represent only a small percentage of total sown land.
Our crop production process is directly linked to the geo-climatic conditions of our farms and our crop cycles, which define the periods for planting and harvesting our various products. Our crop diversification and the location of our farms in various regions of South America enable us to implement an efficient planting and harvesting system throughout the year, which includes second harvests in many cases. Our production process begins with the planting of each crop. After harvesting, crops may go through a processing phase where the grains or seeds are cleaned and dried to reach the required market standards. For additional discussion on our harvest years and the presentation of production and product area information in this annual report, see "Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Fiscal Year and Harvest Year."
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the planted hectaresareas for our main products:
| | | | | | | | | | | Harvest Year |
| | | Harvest Year | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 | |
Product Area(5) | | — |
| | | | | |
| Planted Area | | Planted Area | | (in hectares) |
| Soybean (1) | | 73,310 |
| | 81,269 |
| | 84,434 |
| Soybean (1) | | 68,315 | | | 73,685 | | | 73,309 | |
| Corn (2) | | 47,668 |
| | 56,741 |
| | 47,157 |
| Corn (2) | | 56,568 | | | 61,112 | | | 46,787 | |
| Wheat (3) | | 40,210 |
| | 36,533 |
| | 38,009 |
| Wheat (3) | | 44,392 | | | 32,799 | | | 40,210 | |
| Sunflower | | 3,825 |
| | 2,869 |
| | 5,413 |
| Sunflower | | 16,164 | | | 6,818 | | | 3,825 | |
| Cotton | | 5,316 |
| | 3,132 |
| | 2,640 |
| Cotton | | 3,519 | | | 4,461 | | | 5,316 | |
| Peanut | | 15,478 |
| | 9,375 |
| | 9,475 |
| Peanut | | 26,123 | | | 16,814 | | | 15,479 | |
| Others (4) | | Others (4) | | 2,747 | | | 574 | | | 881 | |
Forage (4)(5) | | 5,828 |
| | 2,589 |
| | 5,177 |
| | 5,337 | | | 6,758 | | | 5,828 | |
| Total | | 191,635 |
| | 192,508 |
| | 192,305 |
| Total | | 223,165 | | | 203,020 | | | 191,635 | |
(1) Includes soybean first crop and second crop planted area.
(2) Includes sorghum and chia.sorghum.
(3) Includes barley crop.
(4) Includes beans, chia and sesame.
(5) Forage includes corn silage, wheat silage and sorghum used for cow feedfeeding cattle in our dairy operation.
(5) As of December 31, 2019.
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the production volumes for our main productsproducts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Harvest Year |
| | | Harvest Year | | | 2021/2022 | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 | |
Crop Production(1) | | (In tons) | |
| Soybeans (2) | | — |
| | 187,226 |
| | 171,392 |
| | 206,437 |
| |
Production(1) | | Production(1) | | (in tons) |
| Soybeans (2) (3) | | Soybeans (2) (3) | | 1,510 | | | 172,969 | | | 181,259 | | | 187,226 | |
| Corn (2) | | 13,679 |
| | 292,698 |
| | 258,054 |
| | 255,940 |
| Corn (2) | | 33,726 | | | 327,164 | | | 364,176 | | | 295,990 | |
| Wheat | | 32,799 |
| | 114,809 |
| | 78,640 |
| | 115,173 |
| Wheat | | 137,749 | | | 122,749 | | | 104,236 | | | 114,809 | |
| Sunflower (2) | | 5,384 |
| | 5,937 |
| | 5,181 |
| | 10,112 |
| Sunflower (2) | | 32,882 | | | 28,436 | | | 12,652 | | | 5,937 | |
| Cotton lint (2) | | — |
| | 653 |
| | 523 |
| | 159 |
| Cotton lint (2) | | 28 | | | 1,772 | | | 1,490 | | | 422 | |
| Peanut (2) | | — |
| | 47,785 |
| | 19,901 |
| | 15,757 |
| Peanut (2) | | — | | | 77,891 | | | 55,630 | | | 47,785 | |
| Others | | Others | | 120 | | | 2,353 | | | 616 | | | — | |
| Total (2) | | 51,862 |
| | 649,108 |
| | 533,691 |
| | 603,578 |
| Total (2) | | 206,015 | | | 733,334 | | | 720,059 | | | 652,169 | |
(1) DoesCrop production does not include 212,650300,782 tons, 120,221226,821 tons and 155,300212,650 tons of forage produced in the 2020/2021, 2019/2020 and 2018/2019,2017/2018, and 2016/2017, harvest years, respectively.
(2) As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of soybean, corn, peanut, sunflower and cotton pertaining to the 2019/20202021/2022 harvest year is ongoing. The only crop whichthat has been fully harvested is wheat.
(3) Does not include the soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
The following table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the sales volume for our main products:
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Sales | | (In thousands of $) | Sales | | (In thousands of US$) |
| Soybeans | | 46,386 |
| | 84,217 |
| | 85,527 |
| |
| Soybeans (5) | | Soybeans (5) | | 56,997 | | | 44,732 | | | 46,386 | |
| Corn (1) | | 60,617 |
| | 36,575 |
| | 86,238 |
| Corn (1) | | 57,504 | | | 45,088 | | | 61,332 | |
Wheat (2) | | 20,318 |
| | 32,706 |
| | 16,723 |
| Wheat (2) | | 27,267 | | | 15,109 | | | 20,318 | |
| Sunflower | | 8,430 |
| | 1,598 |
| | 420 |
| Sunflower | | 16,618 | | | 10,925 | | | 8,430 | |
| Peanut | | 28,876 |
| | 4,196 |
| | 3,163 |
| Peanut | | 60,422 | | | 46,983 | | | 28,994 | |
| Other crops (3) | | 4,311 |
| | 5,246 |
| | 5,151 |
| Other crops (3) | | 10,086 | | | 7,277 | | | 3,478 | |
| Adjustments (4) | | (2,492 | ) | | (9,120 | ) | | — |
| Adjustments (4) | | 11,836 | | | (1,653) | | | (2,492) | |
| Total | | 166,446 |
| | 155,418 |
| | 197,222 |
| Total | | 240,730 | | | 168,461 | | | 166,446 | |
(1) Includes sorghum, chia and peanut.sorghum.
(2) Includes barley.
(3) Includes cotton, other crops and farming services.
(4) AccumulatedRefers to the accumulated adjustment of Hyperinflationhyperinflation in the accounting translation for our Crops segment sales.
(5) Does not include revenue corresponding to the sale of soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
Soybeans
Soybeans are an annual legume widely grown due to their high content of protein (40%) and oil (20%). They have been grown for over 3,000 years in Asia and, more recently, have been successfully cultivated around the world. The world’s top producers of soybeans currently are the United States, Brazil, Argentina, China and India. Soybeans are one of the few plants that provide a complete protein supply as they contain all eight essential amino acids. About 85% of the world’s soybeans are processed, or “crushed,” annually into soybean meal and oil. Approximately 98% of soybean meal is further processed into animal feed, with the balance used to make soy flour and proteins. Of the oil content, 85% is consumed as edible oil and the rest is used for industrial products such as fatty acids, soaps and biodiesel. We sell our soybeans mainly to crushing and processing industries, which produce soybean oil and soybean meal used in the food, animal feed and biofuel industries.
We grow soybeans in Argentina and Uruguay. In the 2016/2017 harvest year, we planted a total area of 84,434 hectares of soybean, producing a total of 206,437 tons representing 46% of our total crop planted area that year, and 35% of our total crop production. In the 2017/2018 harvest year, we planted a total area of 81,269 hectares of soybean, producing a total of 171,392 tons representing 42% of our total crop planted area that year, and 29% of our total crop production. In the 2018/2019 harvest year, we planted a total area of 73,310 hectares of soybean, producing a total of 187,226 tons representing 38% of our total crop planted area that year, and 29% of our total crop production.
Soybeans comprised, 9.2%5.2%, 10.2%5.5%, and 5.1% of our total consolidated sales in 2017, 2018,2019, 2020, and 2019 respectively2021 respectively.
Corn
Corn is a cereal grown around the world and is one of the world’s most widely consumed foods. The main component of corn grain is starch (72% to 73% of grain weight), followed by proteins (8% to 11%). Corn grain is directly used for food and animal feed (beef, swine and poultry meat production and dairy). Corn is also processed to make food and feed ingredients (such as high fructose corn syrup, corn starch and lysine), or industrial products such as ethanol and polylactic acid (PLA). Oil, flour and sugar are also extracted from corn, with several uses in the food, medicine and cosmetic industries. Additionally, there are specific corn types used for direct human consumption such as popcorn and sweet corn.
We grow corn in Argentina and Uruguay. In the 2016/2017 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 47,157 hectares of corn, including the second harvest, producing a total of 255,940 tons of corn representing 28% of our total planted area that year, and 42% of our total crop production. In the 2017/2018 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 56,741 hectares of corn, including the second harvest, producing a total of 258,054 tons of corn representing 30% of our total planted area that year, and 30% of our total crop production. In the 2018/2019 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately
47,668 hectares of corn, including the second harvest, producing a total of 292,698 tons of corn representing 25% of our total planted area that year, and 45% of our total crop production. In the current 2019/2020 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 61,233 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 13,679 tons of corn.
Corn comprised 9.2% of our consolidated sales in 2017, 4.8% of our consolidated sales in 2018, and 6.9% of our consolidated sales in 2019.2019, 5.5% of our consolidated sales in 2020, and 5.1% of our consolidated sales in 2021.
Wheat
Wheat is the world’s largest cereal-grass crop. Unlike other cereals, wheat grain contains a high amount of gluten, the protein that provides the elasticity necessary for excellent bread making. Although most wheat is grown for human consumption, other industries use small quantities to produce starch, paste, malt, dextrose, gluten, alcohol, and other products. Inferior and surplus wheat and various milling by products are used for livestock feed. We sell wheat to exporters and to local mills that produce flour for the food industry.
In the 2016/2017 harvest year, we planted aWheat comprised 2.3% of our total area of approximately 38,009 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 115,173 tons of wheat. In the 2017/2018 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 36,533 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 78,640 tons of wheat. In the 2018/consolidated sales in 2019, harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 40,210 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 114,809 tons of wheat. In the current 2019/2020 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 32,9255 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 32,799 tons of wheat.
Wheat comprised 1.8% of our total consolidated sales in 2017, 4.1%2020, and 2.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2018, and 2.3% of our total consolidated sales in 2019.2021.
Sunflower
There are two types of sunflower, the most important in terms of volume being the oilseed sunflower, which is primarily grown for the oil extracted from the seed. Sunflower oil is considered one of the top three oils for human consumption, due to its high oil content (39-49%) and its oil composition (90% of oleic and linoleic oil). The other type of sunflower is the confectionary sunflower, which is used for direct human consumption. Sunflower seeds are an exceptional source of vitamin E, omega-6 fatty acids, dietary fiber and minerals. We grow both types of sunflower.
We grow sunflower in Argentina and Uruguay. In the 2016/2017 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 5,413 hectares of sunflower producing a total of 10,112 tons of sunflower representing 3% of our total crop planted area that year, and 2% of our total crop production. In the 2017/2018 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 2,869 hectares of sunflower producing a total of 5,181 tons of sunflower representing 1.5% of our total crop planted area that year, and 1% of our total crop production. In the 2018/2019 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 3,825 hectares of sunflower producing a total of 5,937 tons of sunflower representing 2% of our total crop planted area that year, and 1% of our total crop production. In the current 2019/2020 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 6,818 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 5,384 tons of sunflower.
Sunflower comprised 0.3%1.0% of our total consolidated sales in 2017, 0.2%2019, 1.3% in 2018,2020, and 1.0%1.5% in 2019.2021.
Since early 2019, we operate a sunflower processing facility located in Buenos Aires province, Argentina. This enables us to control processing activities and develop direct and long term relationships with different customers around the world.
Peanut
Peanut is a summer legume whichthat has its harvesting process divided in two stages: (1) digging, which implies loosening the plant, cutting the taproot and inverting the plant; and (2) combining which means separating the pods from the vines. Planting activities begin in October and approximately 150 days after planting, digging activities take place. In Argentina, all the peanutpeanuts grown isare high oleic. Córdoba province is Argentina's largest peanut production area due to its optimal agroclimaticagro-climatic conditions, which have led many processing industries to install there.
Argentina is positioned among the most important players in the production and export of this crop,peanuts, with high technological levels both in terms of production as well as processing. Argentina exports more than 90% of the peanuts it produces and its main market is the European Union,E.U., followed by Russia and Latin America. Its main competitors are USA,the United States, Brazil and China. We grow peanutpeanuts in the center region of Argentina . In the 2016/2017 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 9,475 hectares producing a total of 15,757 tons of peanut. In the 2017/2018 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 9,375 hectares of peanut producing a total of 19,901 tons of peanut, representing 1.6% of our total planted crop area that year, and 0.02% of our total crop production. In the 2018/2019 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 15,478 hectares of peanut producing a total of 47,785 tons of peanut, representing 8% of our total planted crop area that year, and 7% of our total crop production.
Argentina.
Peanut comprised 0.0% of our total consolidated sales in 2017, 0.2% of our total consolidated sales in 2018 and 3.3% of our total consolidated sales in 2019.2019, 5.7% of our total consolidated sales in 2020 and 5.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2021.
In FebruarySince early 2019, we completed the acquisition ofown and operate a peanut processing facility equipped with cutting-edge technology, which has been granted all the necessary certifications and export permits.technology. This transactionvertical integration is in line with our strategy to grow our peanut business as it will enableenables us to control processing activities and develop direct and long term relations with different customers around the world.
Forages
In addition to the above mentioned crops, weWe are engaged in the production of forage in Argentina, including corn silage, wheat silage and sorghum silage. We use forage as cow feed in our dairy operation. During the 2018/20192020/2021 harvest year, we planted 5,8285,337 hectares of forage and produced 212,650300,782 tons of forage.
Crop Production Process
Our crop production process is directly linked to the geo-climatic conditions of our farms and our crop cycles, which define the periods for planting and harvesting our various products. Our crop diversification and the location of our farms in various regions of South America enable us to implement an efficient planting and harvesting system throughout the year, which includes second harvests in many cases. Our production process begins with the planting of each crop. After harvesting, crops may go through a processing phase where the grain or seeds are cleaned and dried to reach the required market standards.
For additional discussion of our harvest years and the presentation of production and product area information in this annual report, see “Presentation of Financial and Other Information-Fiscal Year and Harvest Year.”
Rice Business
Rice is the main food staple for about half of the world’s population. Although it is cultivated in over 100 countries and on almost every continent, 90% of the world’s rice is grown and consumed in Asia. Globally, rice is the most important crop in terms of its contribution to human diets and production value. There are three main types of rice: short grain, medium grain and long grain rice. Each one has a different taste and texture. We produce long grain rice and Carolina double rice, a variety of medium grain rice.
We conduct our rice operation in the northeast of Argentina, which is one of the most efficient locations in the world for producing rice at a low cost. This is a result of optimum natural agronomic conditions, including plentiful sunlight, abundant availability of water for low cost irrigation and large quantities of land. The use of public water for artificial irrigation is governed by provincial regulations and is subject to the granting of governmental permits. We currently have permits for the use of water in our production of rice in the provinces of Corrientes and Santa Fe. Maintenance of our permits is subject to our compliance with applicable laws and regulations, which is supervised by the corresponding governmental authority (e.g., the Ministry of Water, Public Services and Environment (Ministerio de Agua, Servicios Publicos y Medio Ambiente), in the province of Santa Fe, and the Water Institute of the Province of Corrientes (Instituto Correntino del Agua).
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the total number of planted rice hectares we owned and leased as well as the overall rough rice we produced:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| Rice Product Area and Production | | 2021/2022 | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| Owned planted area (hectares) | | 43,009 | | | 40,444 | | | 39,162 | | | 37,608 | |
| Leased planted area (hectares) | | 6,031 | | | 3,839 | | | 2,382 | | | 1,700 | |
| Total rice planted (hectares) | | 49,040 | | | 44,282 | | | 41,544 | | | 39,308 | |
Rough rice production (tons) (1) | | 215,252 | | | 346,685 | | | 278,348 | | | 239,779 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| Rice Product Area & Production | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 |
| Owned planted area (hectares) | | 39,162 |
| | 37,608 |
| | 38,589 |
| | 38,028 |
|
| Leased planted area (hectares) | | 2,382 |
| | 1,700 |
| | 1,700 |
| | 1,700 |
|
| Total rice planted (hectares) | | 41,544 |
| | 39,308 |
| | 40,289 |
| | 39,728 |
|
| Rough rice production (tons) (1) | | 223,045 |
| | 239,779 |
| | 276,693 |
| | 234,831 |
|
(1) As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of rice pertaining to the 2019/2020 2021/2022 harvest year is ongoing.
We grow rice on four farms we ownowned by us and twofour farms we lease,leased by us, all located in Argentina. In the 2017/20182018/2019 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 40,28939,308 hectares of rice, producingand produced a total of 276,693239,779 tons representingof rice, which represented 17% of our total planted area that year, and 34%27% of our total farming production. In the 2018/20192019/2020 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 39,30841,544 hectares and produced 278,348 tons of rice, producing a total of 239,779 tons, representingwhich represented 17% of our total planted area thatand 28% of our total farming
production. In the 2020/2021 harvest year, we planted approximately 44,282 hectares and 21%produced 346,685 tons of rice, which represented 17% of our total planted area and 32% of our total farming production. In the current 2019/2020 ongoing 2021/2022 harvest year, we planted a total of 41,544approximately 49,040 hectares of rice, which have not been fully harvested as of the date of this annual report.
Rice comprised 11.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 12.5% in 2020 and 12.0% in 2021.
Rice Production Process
The rice production cycle lasts approximately five to six months, beginning in September of each year and ending in April of the following year. Rice planting continues until November, followed by treatment of the rice, which lasts approximately three months, until January. InOur harvest begins in February we begin harvesting, whichand lasts until April. After harvesting, the rice is ready for processing.
We process rice in our three rice mills in Argentina, where we are able to process our entire rice crop and utilize our excess milling capacity to process rough rice we purchase from third party growers.
At the mill, we clean the rice to remove all impurities. We then put it through a dryer to remove excess moisture from the grains. Proper drying results in increased storage life, prevents deterioration in quality and leads to optimum milling. Once dried, the rice grain, now known as rough rice or paddy rice, is ready for storage. We store rice in elevators or in silo bags until milling. During the milling process, the rough rice goes through a de-huskingdehusking machine that removes the husk from the kernel. The rice that is obtained after this process is known as brown rice and is ready for human consumption. Brown rice becomes white rice after it is polished to remove the excess bran.
The main objective of the milling process is to remove the husk and the bran, preserving the quality of the whole grain. Although the process is highly automated and uses advanced technology, some rice grains are broken in the process. The percentage of broken rice depends on a number of factors such as the crop development cycle at the farm, the variety of the grain, the handling and the industrial process. Average processing of rough rice results in 58.5% white rice, 13.0% broken rice, and 20.0% rice husk and 8.5% bran rice, which is sold for use as cattle feed or floor bedding in the poultry business.
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Processed Rice Production | | (In tons) | Processed Rice Production | | (in tons) |
| Rough rice processed — own | | 250,427 |
| | 266,078 |
| | 208,292 |
| Rough rice processed — own | | 306,602 | | | 263,637 | | | 250,427 | |
| Rough rice processed — third party | | 24,920 |
| | 10,615 |
| | 33,282 |
| Rough rice processed — third party | | 12,130 | | | 26,393 | | | 24,920 | |
| Total rough rice processed | | 275,347 |
| | 276,693 |
| | 241,574 |
| Total rough rice processed | | 318,732 | | | 290,030 | | | 275,347 | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2017 |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Processed Rice Sales | | (In thousand of $) | Processed Rice Sales | | (in thousands of $) |
| Total Sales | | 101,156 |
| | 95,403 |
| | 86,478 |
| Total Sales | | 134,869 | | | 101,862 | | | 101,156 | |
Rice comprised 9.3%11.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2017,2019, 12.5% in 2020 and 12.0% in 2018 and 11.4% in 2019.2021.
Rice Seed Production
In our rice seed facility in Argentina, we are involved in the genetic development of new rice varieties adapted to local conditions to increase rice productivity and quality to improve both farm production as well as the manufacturing process. In connection with these efforts, we have entered into agreements with selected research and development institutions such as the National Institute of Agriculture Technology (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, or “INTA”) in Argentina, the Instituto Riograndense do Arroz or "IRGA "“IRGA” in Brazil, the Híbridos de Arroz para América Latina or "HIAA"“HIAA” in Colombia, the Latin American Fund for Irrigated Rice (Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego, or “FLAR”) in Colombia, the Santa Catarina State Agricultural Research and Rural Extension Agency (Empresa de pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina, or “EPAGRI”) in Brazil and Badische Anilin- und Soda-Fabrik (“Basf”BASF”) in Germany. Our own technical team is continuously testing and developing new rice varieties. Our first rice seed variety, Ita Caabo 105, was released to the market in 2008. In 2011 we released our second variety Ita Caabo 110, and at the beginning of 2014 we released our third variety, Ita Caabo 107. We are currently experimenting with a wide range of varieties to continue improving our productivity.productivity in addition to the development of a hybrid line. These seeds are both used at our
farms and sold to rice farmers in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay
and Paraguay. We are also developing, alongside Basf,BASF, a herbicide-tolerant rice variety to assist in the control of harmful weeds.
Dairy Business
We conduct our dairy operation in our farms located in the Argentine humid pampas region. This region is one of the best places in the world for producing raw milk at a low cost, due to the availability of grains and forages produced efficiently and at low cost, and due to the favorable weather for cow comfort and productivity. Our dairy operation consists of threefour free-stall dairy facilities with a currentan occupancy of 9,06613,742 milking cows as of December 2021, and a total capacity of 10,800.14,400.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated below, the total number of our dairy cows, average daily milk production per cow and our total milk production:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Dairy Herd & Production | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Total dairy herd (head) | | 9,066 |
| | 7,581 |
| | 8,043 |
|
| Average milking cows | | 9,066 |
| | 7,581 |
| | 6,967 |
|
| Average daily production (liters per cow) | | 36.3 |
| | 36.6 |
| | 36.6 |
|
| Total production (thousands of liters) | | 120,069 |
| | 101,300 |
| | 93,168 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Dairy Herd & Production | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Total dairy herd (head) (1) | | 13,742 | | | 11,477 | | | 9,781 | |
Average milking cows (2) | | 12,942 | | | 10,876 | | | 9,066 | |
Average daily production (liters per cow) (2) | | 36.7 | | | 36.5 | | | 36.3 | |
| Total production (thousands of liters) | | 173,148 | | | 145,192 | | | 120,069 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31 |
| Dairy Sales | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | (In thousands of $) |
| Sales | | 83,822 |
| | 29,710 |
| | 37,521 |
|
(1) As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we owned a dairy herd of 8,043, 7,947 and 7,701 head, respectively, including 6,967, 6,880 and 6,658 milking cows, respectively.December.
(2) Annual average.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31 |
| Dairy Sales | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | (In thousands of $) |
| Sales | | 183,054 | | | 133,474 | | | 83,822 | |
Dairy comprised 4.0%9.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2017, 3.7%2019, 16.3% for 20182020 and 9.4%16.3% for 20192021 respectively.
Our four free-stall dairies #1, #2 and #3dairy facilities are fully ramped-upramped up and are delivering high productivity levels. We will completeIn 2020, we began the construction of our fourth free-stall #4 during 2020,facility, which was finalized in February 2021 and we plan to invest $7.7 million over the next three years to populate it and conclude the development of the business. We expect that this investment will allow us to double our productionreach a capacity reachingof over 185 million liters of fluid milk per year and over 14 thousand14,000 total milking cows. We believe this investment is a unique opportunity to leverage on Argentina’s competitive advantages in transforming vegetable protein into milk protein, on our operational expertise, and on the positive outlook for global and local milk prices.
We currently own two milk processing facilities which had been acquired from SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitadas onin February 2019, in addition to “Las 3the Las Tres Niñas”as and “Angelita”Angelita trademarks, both of which are well-known in Argentina and represent a solid commercializationsales vehicle for retail and consumer dairy products. Our milk facilities produce UHT and UP milk, powderpowdered milk and semi-hard cheese, among others. Our facilities have a total installed reception capacity 2.3of 2.4 million liters per day and aan installed processing capacity of 1.71.4 million liters of raw milk per day. We completed 2019 with 182.3To account for the difference between total installed capacity and actual utilization, we must account for the efficiency rate of our machines, maintenance works, number of working days and number of personnel shifts, among other variables. In 2021, we processed 352.5 million liters of raw milk processed.milk.
Our Chivilcoy industrial facility is located in the city of Chivilcoy, Provincein the province of Buenos Aires, and is primarily focused on fluid milk production for the domestic market. It has aan installed processing capacity of 925 thousand555,000 liters per day. This facility has aday and an installed milk reception capacity of 800 thousand1.2 million liters per day, which can be used to produceday. The facility has an installed processing capacity of 510,000 liters of UHT UP milk orand 45,000 liters of yogurt, (after additional investments), of which UHT accounts for 600 thousand liters, UP 155 thousandcream and yogurt 170 thousand. We completed 2019 with over 78cocoa flavored milk. In 2021, we processed 112.4 million liters of raw milk processed in the Chivilcoy facility.
Our Morteros industrial facility is located in the city of Morteros, Provincein the province of Córdoba, and produces powderpowdered milk and semi-hard cheese mainlyprimarily for the export market. Morteros plant has aan installed processing capacity of 850 thousand840,000 liters per day 550 thousand correspond to(550,000 liters for milk powderpowdered and the balance to cheese. This facility290,000 liters for cheese), and it has aan installed milk reception capacity of 1.51.2 million liters per day, of which 360 thousand correspond to raw milk, 930 thousand to powder milk and 240 to cheese. We concluded 2019 with over 104.0day. In 2021, we processed 235.7 million liters of raw milk processed in the Morteros facility.
Dairy Production Process
We wean calves during the 24 hours subsequent to birth and during the next 60 days raise them on pasteurized milk and high protein meal. Male calves are fed concentrates and hay for an additional 3three months in the farm before they are sent to
our feedlot or to third party feedlots to be fattened for sale. Young heifers remain in open corrals during the next 13 months where they are fed with concentrates and forage until they are ready for breeding. Calving occurs nine months later. Heifers are subsequently milked for an average of 320 days. Dairy cows are once again inseminated during the 42-42 to 90-day period following calving. This process is repeated once a year for a period of three or four years. The pregnancy rate for our herd is between 85% and 90% per year.
Each cow in our dairy herd is mechanically milked three times a day. The milk obtained is cooled to less than four degrees centigrade in order to preserve its quality and is then stored in a tank.tank, or directly loaded to trucks which derives in increased quality and lower costs. Milk is delivered mainly to our processing facilities and the balance is sold to large third party milk processing facilities on a daily basis by tank trucks. We feed our dairy cows mainly with corn and alfalfa silages, some grass and corn grain, supplemented as needed with soybean by-products, hay, vitamins and minerals.
We have invested in technology to improve the genetics of our cows, animal health and feeding in order to enhance our milk production. These investments include top quality imported semen from genetically improved North American Holstein bulls, agricultural machinery and devices, use of dietary supplements and modern equipment to control individual milk production and cooling. Our feeding program is focused on high conversion of feed into milk, while maintaining cows in good health and comfort. We have also invested in technology and know-how so as to increase our forage production and utilization.
In 2007, we began the construction of an advanced “free-stall” dairy in Argentina, and started operating in March 2008. This technology allows large- scale milk production at increased efficiency levels. Our free-stall dairy model consists of 3,500 cows confined inside a large barn where they are free to move within the indoor corrals. We feed our cows specific protein rich diets composed of corn grain and silage and milk them three times a day, using a milking mechanism consisting of an 80-cow rotary platform, which milks an average of 400 cows per hour. Having proved the success of our model we built two additional free-stall facilities. Construction of free-stall #2 started in 2011 and operations began in August 2012, while construction of free-stall #3 began in 2018 and operations in 2019. Lastly, we decided to start the construction of free-stall #4 which will be finished in 2020.
Implementation of the free-stall system allows us to position ourselves as a key player in the dairy industry and boost our agricultural and industrial integration presence in the South American agricultural sector. By eliminating cow grazing, we reduced the amount of land utilized for milk production, which freed up more land for our agricultural and land development activities. Cow productivity (measured in liters of milk produced per day) using the free-stall system increases by up to 40% compared to traditional grazing systems. These productivity gains are because the free-stall system significantly improves the conversion rate of animal feed to milk, resulting in an approximate 40% increase in the conversion ratio, or the production of 1.4 liters of milk for each 1 kg of animal feed as compared to the average of 1 liter of milk for each 1 kg of feed associated with the usual grazing model.
This increased productivity and conversion rate are mainlyprimarily due to improved cow comfort and an enhanced diet quality. We assess cow comfort through the engagement of expert consultants, who recommended designing beds covered with sand. The sand plays a significant role in helping cows to rest comfortably. Additionally, we installed a cooling system to increase cow comfort as well. This system relies on water sprinklers and ventilation fans located all over the facility to create a controlled, cool atmosphere, which improves cow comfort as the Holstein herd is originally adapted to cold regions. Additionally, we manage diet quality by adapting our feeding regime based on the various feeding stages in the lifetime of each cow. The actual feeding is fully mechanized, and we carefully control the harvesting and storage of feed. The control of all productivity variables, such as reproduction, health and operations, supports efficiency gains through standardized processes. Finally, the physical concentration of the animals facilitates efficient overall management of the dairyDairy business as a whole. In terms of the environment, the free-stall model allows for a better effluent treatment, which includes a sand-manure separator stage, a decantation pool and an anaerobic lagoon. All these processes help to decrease the organic matter content of the effluent and deliver a cleaner output. The final treated effluent is used to fert-irrigatefertigate crops adjacent to the dairy operation. Accordingly, we transform dairy waste into a high value-added by-product, which reduces fertilizer usage.
During October 2017, we completed the construction of our first bio-digester.biodigester. This facility enhances the sustainability of our free-stall dairy operation by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving the effluent management and concentrating valuable nutrients which are applied back to the fields. It generates electricity by burning biogas extracted from the effluents produced by our seven thousand milking cows. On November 3, 2017, we began generating and delivering 1.4 MW of electricity to the local
power grid. In addition of enchanceto enhancing in the sustainability of our diary operation, it increases revenues and secures our energy requirements.
The free-stall dairy is expected to allow us to become an efficient large-scale milk producer and optimize the use of our resources (land, cattle and capital) through the standardization of processes. Process standardization provides high operational control and allows us to scale-up our production efficiently and quickly.
All Other Segments
All Other Segments primarily encompassesencompass our cattle business. Our cattle segment consists of pasture land that is not suitable for crop production due to soil quality and is leased to third parties for cattle grazing activities.
We currently own 55,28855,509 hectares of cattle grazing land located in the Argentine provinces of Corrientes, Santa Fe, Formosa and Buenos Aires.Santiago del Estero. In 2019,2021, we entered into new lease agreements with third partythird-party cattle farmers for a total area of 13,54614,935 hectares.
Storage and Conditioning for the Farming Business
Our storage and conditioning facilities in the farmingFarming business allow us to condition, store and deliver our products with no third-party involvement. All our crop storage facilities are located close to our farms, allowing us to (i) reduce storage and conditioning costs; (ii) reduce freight costs since we only commence moving the product once the final destination is determined, whether locally or to a port,port; (iii) capitalize on fluctuations in the prices of commodities; and (iv) improve commercial performance by mixing grains to avoid discounts due to sub-standardsubstandard quality.
We own two conditioning and storage facilities for grains and oilseeds, with a total built storage capacity of 38,74037,000 tons. Our largest storage facility, withOne of our facilities has a capacity of 19,24012,500 tons and is located in the province of Santa Fe, Argentina, in the town of Christophersen. It has a railway loading terminal, providing logistical flexibility and savings. Our other facility is located in Buenos Aires province close to Bahía Blanca’s deep water port, in an area where we produce 120,000 tons of grains. In addition, our peanut processing facility has the capacity to store 10,000 tons of finished product (and 50,000 of in-shell product), while our sunflower processing facility has the capacity to store 4,000 tons of sunflower. We also own in Argentina three rice mills, which account for over 120,000126,500 tons of total storage capacity, and one additional conditioning facilitiesfacility for rice handling, with a total storage capacity of 6,300 tons.
SetThe table below sets forth below is our storage capacity as of December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Storage Capacity | | Nominal |
| Crops (tons) (1) | | 38,740 |
51,000 |
| Rice (tons) | | 120,000 |
132,800 |
| Dairy (liters) (2) | | 5,823,000 |
25,800,000 |
(1) Does not include 60 thousandIncludes 37,000 tons of inshell and 7 thousand tons of finished product corresponding to theour two conditioning and storage facilities, 10,000 tons to our peanut processingfacility and 4,000 tons to our sunflower facility.
(2) The Morteros facility accounts for 1.624.3 million liters of fluid milk (equivalent to 2,500 tons of milk powder and 360 tons of cheese) while the Chivilcoy accounts for 4.21.5 million liters of fluid milk.
In addition, we use silo bags to increase our storage capacity at a low cost. Silo bags are an efficient low-cost method for grain storage. As crops are harvested, they are placed inside large polyethylene bags that can be left in the fields for approximately 12 months without damaging the grain. Each silo bag can hold up to 180 to 200 tons of product, depending on the type of grain. During the 2018/20192020/2021 harvest year, we stored approximately 50% of our grain production through silo bags.
Silo bags offer important operational and logistic advantages, such as (i) low cost storage; (ii) flexible and scalable capacity that is adapted based on production and commercial strategy; (iii) harvest efficiencies since the bags are filled on the field allowing for a non-stop harvest operation regardless of any logistical setbacks; (iv) logistic efficiencies leading to lower freight since grains are transported during the off-season when truck fares are lower; (v) increased ability to monitor quality and identify different grain qualities, since grains are stored in relatively small amounts (200 tons) and easily monitored, maximizing our commercial performance; and (vi) better use of our drying capacity throughout the year. Silo bags are commercially accepted. Grains stored in silo bags can be sold in the market, and if such grains are to be delivered post-harvest, we charge storage costs. Additionally, we can store grains to be used as seed during the following season (soybeans, rice and wheat), achieving quality seed management. We have expanded the use of silo bags from Argentina to our operations in Brazil and Uruguay.
Grain conditioning facilities at our farms allow our trade desk to optimize commercialization costs and to achieve commercial quality standards and avoid price discounts. These facilities are operated to dry, clean, mix and separate different qualities of each grain in order to achieve commercial standards. By mixing different batches of a same grain type, differentiated by quality parameters such as moisture, percentage broken, and percentage damaged, among others, we can achieve commercial standards
without having to discount a lower-quality stand-alone batch. Efficient management of these facilities results in a lower cost for grain conditioning and a better achievable price.
SetThe table below sets forth below is our drying capacity as of December 31, 2019:2021:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Drying Capacity | | Nominal |
| Crops (tons/day) (1) | | 8,640 |
9,925 |
| Rice (tons/day) | | 6,300 |
6,850 |
(1) Does not include 1,250 tons per day of peanutIncludes the drying capacity corresponding to theour two grain conditioning and storage facilities, our peanut processing facility
and our sunflower processing facility.
Some grains such as soybeans, wheat and rice, can be used for seed during the next planting season. We produce almost 97% of the seed used for planting these crops in our fields. The seed is stored in silo bags and/or grain facilities, where it can be processed, classified, and prepared for planting during next crop season. A deep survey and monitoring process is carried out in order to evaluate, control and deliver high quality seed to our farms.
The rest of our seed requirements are purchased from seed suppliers in order to incorporate new enhanced varieties into our planting plan.
Marketing, Sales and Distribution for the Farming Business
Crops
In Argentina, grain prices are based on the market prices quoted on Argentine grain exchanges, such as the Bolsa de Cereales de Buenos Aires and the Bolsa de Cereales de Rosario,, which use as a reference the prevailing prices in international grain exchanges (including CBOT and ICE-NY). In Uruguay, local prices are based on an export parity (during harvest) or import parity in the case of post-harvest sales, which, in each case, taketakes into account the prices and costs associated with each market. In Brazil, the grain market includes the Bolsa de Mercadorias e Futuros ((the Brazilian Grain Exchange), which, as in Argentina, uses as a price reference the international grain exchanges (including CBOT and ICE-NY). Prices are quoted in relation to the month of delivery and the port in which the product is to be delivered. Different conditions in price, such as terms of storage and shipment, are negotiated between us and the end buyer. We negotiate sales with the top traders and industrial companies in our markets. We also engage in hedging positions by buying and selling futures and options in commodities exchanges, including the Chicago Board of Trade, the New York Board of Trade, BMF&FBOVESPA Exchangethe B3, and the Mercado aTérmino de Buenos Aires (MATBA).
Soybeans:Soybeans
Our soybean crop is sold to local companies and is ultimately exported or diverted to the crushing industry. Approximately 52%63% of the soybean crop was hedged pre-harvest, by forward sales and sales in the futures markets. Harvest and post-harvest sales are a function of the export market versus local premiums paid by crushers (oil, meal and biodiesel) and logistics considerations. Our five largest customers comprisedaccounted for approximately 79%82% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2019. In Argentina, the applicable export tax rate on soybeans May-20 is 33%. There are no export taxes in Brazil and Uruguay.2021.
Corn:Corn
Our production is mainly destined to the export market. Our five largest customers comprised approximately 67%79% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.
Wheat:Wheat
Our wheat production is mainly destined to export industry. Quality segregation allows us to negotiate premiums with the millers and export market. Brazil is the main importer of Argentine wheat. Our five largest customers comprised approximately 79% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.
Sunflower:Sunflower
Our sunflower production from Argentina is sold to local companies. Sales are made pursuant by production agreements of sunflower for confectionary, high oil content sunflower and seed. Our twofour largest customers comprised 100%95% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.
Peanut:Peanut
Approximately 90%95% of our peanut production is exported. Our ten10 largest customers comprised approximately 65% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, while the European Union was the destination for over 90%85% of our sales. In Argentina, the applicable export tax rate on peanuts May-20 is 7%.
Cotton:
We typically make pre-harvest sales of cotton fiber produced in Argentina into the export market. Sales for the textile industry are based on domestic demand and premiums. Our two largest customers comprised approximately 100% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2019.2021. Cotton seed is sold in the domestic market to meet feed demand.
Customers
We sell manufactured and agricultural products to a large base of customers. The type and class of customers may differ depending on our business segments, regions and some logistics issues that are very important in our decision making, For making. In
the year ended December 31, 20192021, more than 85%90% of our sales of crops were sold to 10 well-known customers, both multinational orinternational and local. Of these customers, the first threefive cases represented almost 58%70% of our sales and the remaining tenfive customers represented approximately 27%20% of our net sales in the course of that year.2021.
Rice:
Rice
Rough rice is available for sale commencing after the harvest of each year. White rice availability is based on our milling capacity. 70%83% of our total rice production is sold into the export market, with the remainder sold in Argentina in the retail market. We export approximately 10%34% of our exported volume to the European Union, 25% to Cuba, 14% to Mexico; and the balance to the Middle East, 90% balance toBrazil, Chile and other LatinCentral American countries, Central America, Europe and Africa.countries. We sell approximately 30%17% of our rice in the Argentine retail market through twothree brands, we own thatwhich collectively have a 18%15.8% market share. Local rice prices are driven by regional supply demand and other world export prices. Our fivesix largest customers for rice comprisedin the retail market accounted for approximately 50%53% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.
Dairy:
During 2019, 77%In 2021, 73% of our raw milk production was destined to our processing facilities, while the majority of the balance was sold to onea single dairy producer. We negotiate the price of raw milk on a monthly basis in accordance with domestic supply and demand. The price of the milk we sell is mainly based on the percentage of fat and protein that it contains and the temperature at which it is cooled. The price we obtain for ourof milk also rises or falls based on the content of bacteria and somatic cells. In less than a year since beginning of operations, we becameWe are one of the top ten10 dairy processors in Argentina, considering our free-stall production of about 350 thousandover 500,000 liters per day and the raw milk we source from 131140 farmers (112(123 in Morteros and 1917 in Chivilcoy).
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business
The following table sets forth a breakdown of our production volumes by product for the years indicated in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Sugar (tons) (1) | | 546,819 | | | 646,981 | | | 213,256 | |
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 534,603 | | | 502,170 | | | 756,494 | |
| Energy (MWh exported) | | 730,739 | | | 717,915 | | | 853,139 | |
(1) Includes 4,145 tons of organic sugar in 2021, 8,659 tons in 2020 and 1,783 tons in 2019.
The following table sets forth our sales for each of the sugarcane by-products we produce for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | (In thousands of $) |
| Sugar | | 208,365 | | | 171,102 | | | 97,710 | |
| Ethanol | | 291,883 | | | 199,062 | | | 373,847 | |
| Energy | | 48,017 | | | 41,169 | | | 59,701 | |
| Other | | 13,745 | | | 126 | | | 525 | |
| Total | | 562,010 | | | 411,459 | | | 531,783 | |
Sugarcane
Sugarcane is a tropical grass that grows best in locations with stable, warm temperatures and high humidity, although cold and dry winters are an important factor for the sucrose concentration of sugarcane. The climate and topography of the center-south region of Brazil is ideal for the cultivation of sugarcane and accounts for approximately 85% of Brazil's sugarcane production. Sugarcane is the most efficient agricultural raw material used in the production of sugar and ethanol. Ethanol produced from sugarcane is highly regarded as an environmentally friendly biofuel with the following characteristics.
Renewable: Sugarcane ethanol, unlike coal or oil, which can be depleted, is produced from sugarcane plants that grow back year after year, provided that they are replanted every sixfive to eightseven years.
Sustainable: Sugarcane only needs to be replanted every five to seven years, as a semi-perennial crop. It can be harvested without uprooting the plant, and therefore its cultivation has less of an impact on the soil and the surrounding environment. The mechanization of the harvesting and planting process further improves sustainable agricultural management.
Energy Efficient: Sugarcane is highly efficient in converting sunlight, water and carbon dioxide into stored energy. The energy output of sugarcane is equal to nine times the energy input used in the production process, whereas the energy output of corn ethanol is only about 1.9 to 2.3 times the energy input used in its production process. Sugarcane produces seven times more energy compared to corn used for ethanol production.
Low Carbon Emissions: Compared to gasoline, sugarcane ethanol reduces greenhouse gases by more than 61%, which is the greatest reduction of any other liquid biofuel produced today in large quantities. Ethanol made from sugarcane is deemed an advanced biofuel by the United States EPA.
Synergies: The main raw material used in the production of electricity in sugar mills is bagasse, which is a by-product of the sugarcane milling process, allowing for a renewable source of co-generated electricity.
Sugarcane is a tropical grass that grows best in locations with stable, warm temperatures and high humidity, although cold and dry winters are an important factor for the sucrose concentration of sugarcane. The climate and topography of the center-south region of Brazil is ideal for the cultivation of sugarcane and accounts for approximately 85% of Brazil’s sugarcane production.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, our sugarcane plantations consisted of 166,041185,806 hectares of sugarcane planted in the center-south region ofMinas Gerais and Mato Grosso do Sul in Brazil. Approximately 94%96% of our sugarcane is planted over land leased through agricultural partnerships. Under these agreements, our partners lease land to us for periods of between one and two sugarcane cycles, equivalent to periods of between 10seven to 1214 years, on which we cultivate the sugarcane. Lease payments are based on the market value of the sugarcane set forth by the regulations of the State of SaoSão Paulo Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Growers CounselCouncil (Conselho dos Produtores deCana-de-Açúcar, Açúcar e Álcool do Estado de Sao Paulo,São Paulo) or “Consecana”). We planted and harvested approximately 96%of the total sugarcane we milled during 2019,2021, with the remaining 4.0%4% purchased directly from third parties at prices also determined by the Consecana system, based on the sucrose content of the cane and the prices of sugar and ethanol. The following table sets forth a breakdown during the time periods indicated of the amount of sugarcane we milled that was grown on our owned and leased land or purchased from third parties:
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | (In tons) | | (In tons) |
| Grown on our owned and leased land | | 10,411,801 | | 10,748,091 | | 9,068,844 | Grown on our owned and leased land | | 10,479,720 | | 10,464,893 | | 10,411,801 |
| Purchased from third parties | | 433,335 | | 611,112 | | 1,172,959 | Purchased from third parties | | 460,587 | | 638,307 | | 433,335 |
| Total | | 10,845,136 | | 11,359,204 | | 10,241,803 | Total | | 10,940,307 | | 11,103,200 | | 10,845,136 |
Sugarcane Harvesting Cycle
The annual sugarcane harvesting period in the center-south region of Brazil begins in April and ends in November/December of each year. In Mato Grosso do Sul, where our cluster is located, the weather pattern is less seasonal than in Sao Paulo. Our wet season is dryer and our dry season is more humid than traditional sugarcane regions. As a consequence of this weather pattern, the sugar content, (TRS)or “TRS,” gap between the beginning and the end of the year compared to the peak of the harvest is much smaller than in SaoSão Paulo. This allows us to grow and harvest sugarcane year roundyear-round with a minimal impact on sugar content (TRS).TRS.
Since the beginning of the 2016/172017 harvest year, we implemented a “non-stop” or “continuous harvest”.“continuous” harvest. This means that we will harvest and crush sugarcane year-round, without stopping during the traditional off-season. This new strategy will allowallows us to increase annual sugarcane milling and sugar, ethanol and energy production by approximately 10%. Another benefit of the system is that we will be producingproduce ethanol in the off-season, when market prices usually have a high premium to prices at harvest. In addition, cogeneration efficiency is related to harvested volumes and unrelated to TRS, enabling us to utilize our cogeneration potential during the whole year. Considering that approximately 87% of total costs are fixed, this model will resulthas resulted not only in higher revenues but also in the dilution of our fixed costs.costs.
We plant several sugarcane varieties, depending on the quality of the soil, the local microclimate and the estimated date of harvest of such area. Once planted, sugarcane can be harvested, once a year, up to six to eight consecutive years. With
each subsequent harvest, agricultural yields decrease. The plantations must be carefully managed and treated during the year in order to continue to attain sugar yields similar to a newly-planted crop.
We believe we own one of the most mechanized harvesting operations in Brazil. Our sugarcane harvesting process is currently 98%99% mechanized (100% at the Angélica and Ivinhema mills and 86%92% at the UMA mill) and the remaining 2%1% is harvested manually. Mechanized harvesting does not require burning prior to harvesting, significantly reducing environmental impact when compared to manual harvesting. In addition, the leaves that remain on the fields after the sugarcane has been harvested mechanically create a protective cover for the soil, reducing evaporation and protecting it from sunlight and erosion. This protective cover of leaves decomposes into organic material over time, which increases the fertility of the soil. Mechanized harvesting is more time efficient and has lower costs when compared to manual harvesting. Sugarcane is ready for harvesting when the crop’s sucrose content is at its highest level. Sucrose content and sugarcane yield (tons of cane per hectare) are important measures of productivity for our harvesting operations. Geographical factors, such as soil quality, topography and climate, as well as agricultural techniques that we implement, affect our productivity. Since most sugar mills produce both sugar and ethanol in variable mixes, the industry has adopted a conversion index for measuring sugar and ethanol production capacity, the Total Recoverable Sugar (“TRS”) index, which measures the amount of kilograms of sugar per ton of sugarcane.
During the 20192021 harvest, our mills harvested sugarcane with an average TRS content of 133128 kg/ton and an average yield of 7669 tons of sugarcane per hectare.
hectare, compared to 132 kg/ton and 79 tons per hectare in 2020, respectively.
Once the sugarcane is harvested, it is transported to our mills for inspection and weighing. We utilize our own trucks and trailers for transportation purposes. The average transportation distance from the sugarcane fields to the mills is approximately 2830 kilometers at the UMA mill and 33 kilometers at the Angélica and Ivinhema.Ivinhema mills.
Our Sugar Mills
We currently own three sugar mills in Brazil, Brazil—UMA, Angélica and Ivinhema. Our mills produce sugar, ethanol and energy, and have the flexibility to adjust the production mix between sugar and ethanol, to take advantage of more favorable market demand and prices at given points in time. As of December 31, 2019,2021, our sugar mills had a total installed crushing capacity of 14.2 million tons of sugarcane, of which 13.0 million tons correspond to our sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.Sul. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we concluded the 20192021 harvest crushing an aggregate volume of 10.810.9 million tons of sugarcane.
The Usina Monte AlegreUMA mill (“UMA”) is located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and has a sugarcane crushing capacity of 1.2 million tons per year, full cogeneration capacity and an associated sugar brand with strong presence in the regional retail market (Aç(Açúcar Monte Alegre)Alegre). UMA is also engaged in the production of organic sugar and, in 2020, it exported product for the first time, after having received the necessary certification to export organic sugar to the E.U. We plant and harvest 99.7%98.5% of the sugarcane milled at UMA, with the remaining 0.3%1.5% acquired from third parties. On December 31, 2019, UMA concluded its harvest operations for the 20192021 season crushing 1.2 million816,000 tons of sugarcane.
Angélica is an advanced mill, completed in 2010 and located in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, with a total sugarcane crushing capacity of 5.6 million tons per year. The mill is equipped with two modern high pressure boilers and three turbo-generators with the capacity to generate approximately 96105 MW of electricity through the use of sugarcane bagasse. The energy produced through this process is used to power the mill with an excess of 70MW70 MW available for sale to the power grid. Angélica has the flexibility to vary production between ethanol and sugar from 60% to 40% for either product.
During mid-2011, we started the construction of ourOur third mill, Ivinhema, is located in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, approximately 45 kilometers south of our existingthe Angelica mill, in order to complete our planned sugarcane cluster in that region. The construction of the first phase of themill. Ivinhema mill was completed during the beginning of 2013 reaching 2.0 million tons of sugarcane crushing capacity, and milling operations commenced on April 25, 2013. During early 2014, we began the construction of the second phase of the Ivinhema, adding 3.7 million tons of additional nominal crushing capacity. The investment consisted on expanding the milling equipment, building a new fluidized bed boiler, two new electrical generators and expanding the sugar factory and ethanol distillery, as well as expanding the sugarcane plantation and agricultural machinery. The construction was completed during mid-2015. Ivinhema now has a total millingsugarcane crushing capacity of 7.4 million tons per year. The mill is equipped with state-of-the-art technology including full cogeneration capacity, flexibility to produce sugar and ethanol and fully mechanized agricultural operations. Ivinhema has capacity to produce up to 441,533371,306 tons of sugar, 444,000371,306 cubic meters of ethanol and 503,200612,000 MWh of energy exports.
We have been undertaking an expansion project to increase nominal crushing capacity by 30% (See — Our Business Strategy).
Our Main Products
The following table sets forth a breakdown of our production volumes by product for the years indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Sugar (tons) | | 213,256 |
| | 344,137 |
| | 567,068 |
|
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 756,494 |
| | 675,001 |
| | 434,015 |
|
| Energy (MWh exported) | | 853,139 |
| | 705,539 |
| | 712,425 |
|
The following table sets forth our sales for each of the sugarcane by-products we produce for the years indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | (In thousands of $) |
| Sugar | | 97,710 |
| | 128,377 |
| | 305,688 |
|
| Ethanol | | 373,847 |
| | 324,661 |
| | 241,650 |
|
| Energy | | 59,652 |
| | 57,797 |
| | 62,218 |
|
| Other | | 574 |
| | 103 |
| | 1,063 |
|
| Total | | 531,783 |
| | 510,938 |
| | 610,619 |
|
Sugar
As of December 31, 20192021, our sugar production capacity was approximately 3,9403,550 tons per day, which, in a normal year of 16,05315,797 hours of milling, results in an annual sugar maximum production capacity of over 907,089803,862 tons of sugar. The increased capacity is the result of enhanced operational efficiencies and minimum CapEx investments. In 2019, we produced 213,256 tons of sugar, compared to 344,137 tons of sugar in 2018 and 567,068 tons of sugar in 2017.
We produce twothree types of sugar: organic sugar, very high polarization, (“VHP”)or “VHP” sugar, standard raw sugar and white crystal sugar. VHP sugar, a raw sugar with a minimum polarization of 99.00 degrees and a maximum polarization of 99.49
degrees of sucrose content, is similar to the type of sugar traded in major commodities exchanges, including the standard NY11 contract. The main difference between VHP sugar and NY11 raw sugar is the sugar content of VHP sugar, and it therefore commands a price premium over NY11 raw sugar. Crystal sugar is a non-refined white sugar (color 150 ICUMSA) produced directly from sugarcane juice.
As of December 31, 2021, our sugar production capacity was approximately 3,550 tons per day, which, in a normal year of 15,797 hours of milling, results in an annual sugar maximum production capacity of over 803,862 tons of sugar. Sugar sales comprised 32.8%11.0%, 16.2%20.9% and 11.0%18.5% of our total consolidated sales in 2017, 20182019, 2020 and 2019,2021, respectively.
Sugar Production Process
There are essentially five steps in the sugar manufacturing process. First, we crush the sugarcane to extract the sugarcane juice. We then treat the juice to remove impurities. The residue is used to make an organic compost used as fertilizer in our sugarcane fields. The juice is then boiled until the sugar crystallizes, and sugar is then separated from the molasses (glucose which does not crystallize) by centrifugation. The resulting sugar is dried and sent to storage and/or packaging. We use the molasses in our production of ethanol.
On average, one metric ton of sugarcane contains 140 kilograms of TRS. While a mill can produce either sugar or ethanol, the TRS input requirements differ between these two products. On average, 1.045 kilograms of TRS equivalent are required to produce 1.0 kilogram of sugar, while the amount of TRS required to produce 1 liter of ethanol is 1.691 kilograms.
Ethanol
As of December 2019,2021, our ethanol production capacity was approximately 3,5503,200 cubic meters per day which, in a normal year of 16,05315,797 hours of milling, results in maximum annual production capacity of over 825,111738,220 cubic meters of ethanol. The increased capacity is the result of enhanced operational efficiencies and minimum CapEx investments. In 2017 we produced 434,015 cubic meters of ethanol, compared to 675,001 cubic meters in 2018 and 756,494 cubic meters in 2019.
We produce and sell two different types of ethanol: hydrous ethanol and anhydrous ethanol, (asas further described in “-Production Process-Ethanol”). the section below.
Ethanol sales comprised 25.9%42.1%, 24.3% and 26.0% of our total consolidated sales in 2017, 40.9%2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Since 2020 as part of our total consolidated sales in 2018the RenovaBio program, every time we sell ethanol we have the right to issue and 42.1%sell carbon credits, which are traded on Brazil’s B3 platform. The number of our total consolidated sales in 2019.carbon credits that are issued are determined by the score granted by the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas & Biofuels (ANP) based on how “green” the mill operation is deemed to be. During 2021 we sold 503.5 thousand CBios at an average price of R$41.20/CBio (average net price of US$7.30 per CBio). Please see “Our Company- 2. Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business” above.
Ethanol Production ProcessLand Transformation Business
We acquire farmland that we believe is undeveloped or underutilized. By implementing cutting-edge production technology and agricultural best practices, we render this land suitable for more productive uses, enhance yields and increase its overall value. We promote sustainable land use through our land transformation activities, which seek to promote environmentally responsible agricultural production and a balance between production and ecosystem preservation. We do not operate in heavily wooded areas or wetland areas.
EthanolMoreover, from time to time, we seek to recycle our capital by selling a portion of its fully developed farms. This allows us to monetize capital gains generated by land transformation activities and allocate our capital to acquire land with higher transformation potential or to deploy it in other businesses, thereby enhancing return on invested capital. During the 19-year period since our inception, we have effectively put into production over 171,000 hectares of land that were previously undeveloped or undermanaged. We realize and capture land transformation value through the strategic disposition of assets that have reached full development potential. We believe that the rotation of our land portfolio allows us to efficiently reallocate capital and maximize our return on invested capital. Our current land portfolio consists of 219,850 hectares (net of minority interests) distributed throughout our operating regions as follows: 93% in Argentina, 6% in Brazil, and 1% in Uruguay. During the last 15 years, we sold 25 of our fully mature farms, generating capital gains of approximately US$250 million.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data relating to our land transformation business:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Undeveloped/undermanaged land put into production (hectares) | | — | | 1,903 | | — |
| Ongoing transformation of arable land (hectares) | | 123,313 | | 123,313 | | 126,854 |
Number of farm sold (1) | | — | | 2 | | 1 |
Hectares sold (2) | | — | | 5,444 | | 6,082 |
Capital gains from the sale of land (in thousands of US$) (1) | | — | | 1,500 | | 9,376 |
(1) In 2020, we sold the Huelen farm (amounting to 4,633 hectares) and a 811 hectares plot of the Abolengo farm.
(2) Includes the sale of non-controlling interests in farmland companies.
Our Competitive Strengths
•Unique and strategic asset base. We own strategically located farmland and agro-industrial assets in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. We continuously improve our operations and practices, resulting in the reduction of operating costs and an increase in productivity and ultimately enhancing the value of our properties and generating capital gains. Our operations also benefit from strategically located industrial facilities throughout Argentina and Brazil, increasing operating efficiencies and reducing operating and logistical costs. We are vertically integrated where economics and returns are attractive, where the efficiency of our primary operation is significantly enhanced, or where lack of a competitive market results in the absence of a transparent price determination mechanism. Our diversified asset base creates valuable synergies and economies of scale, including (i) the ability to transfer the technologies and best practices that we have developed across our business lines, (ii) the ability to apply value-adding land transformation strategies to farmland in connection with our farming and sugarcane operations, and (iii) a greater ability to negotiate more favorable terms with our suppliers and customers.
Owning a significant portion of the land on which we operate is a key element of our business model.
•Low-cost production leveraging agro-ecological competitive advantages. Each of the commodity products we grow is produced in regions where agro-ecological conditions provide competitive advantages and which, through the fermentationimplementation of our efficient and sustainable production model, allow us to become one of the lowest cost producers.
•Our grain and oilseed production is based in the humid Argentine pampas region, where soil fertility, regular rainfalls, temperate climate, the availability of land and the relative proximity to ports contribute to the reduced use of fertilizers and agrochemicals, high productivity and stable yields and efficient logistics, ultimately resulting in one of the lowest costs per ton of grain produced and delivered.
•Our rice operation is located in the northeast provinces of Argentina, one of the best rice farming regions in the world due to plentiful sunlight, the abundant availability of water for low-cost irrigation, and a large potential for expansion.
•Our dairy operation is situated in the humid Argentine pampas region, where cow feed (grains, oilseeds and forage) is efficiently and abundantly produced at a low cost and climate and sanitary conditions are optimal for cow comfort, which enhances productivity, cow reproduction rates and milk quality.
•We produce sugarcane in the states of Mato Grosso do Sul and Minas Gerais in Brazil, where the combination of soil and climate result in high sugarcane productivity and quality, resulting in one of the lowest production costs in the world (significantly lower than other major sugar producing regions, including India, China, the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany).
•Standardized and scalable agribusiness model applying technologicalinnovation. We have consistently used innovative production techniques to ensure that we are at the forefront of technological improvements and environmental sustainability standards in our industry. We are implementing an agribusiness model that consists of specializing our workforce and defining standard protocols to track crop development and control production variables, thereby enhancing management decision-making. We further optimize our agribusiness model through the effective implementation and constant adaptation of a portfolio of advanced agricultural and information technologies and best practices tailored to each region in which we operate and commodity we produce, allowing us to improve our crop yields, reduce operating costs and maximize margins in a sustainable manner.
•In our Farming business, we use “no-till” technology as the cornerstone of production in our Crops segment and have been able to implement this technique in areas within our production regions where it was not previously used. Furthermore, we also utilize crop rotation, second harvests, integrated pest management, balanced fertilization, water management and mechanization. Additionally, we use the silo bag storage method, utilizing large polyethylene bags with a capacity of 180 to 200 tons which can be left on the field for 12 months, resulting in low-cost, scalable and flexible storage on the field during harvest, which we believe allows us to expand our crop storage capacity at a low cost, generate important logistic and freight savings by moving our production in the off-season when freight fares are lower, and time the entry of our production into the market at optimal price points. See “—Operations and Principal Activities—Farming—Storage and Conditioning.”
•In our Dairy segment, we believe that we were the first company in South America to implement the “free-stall” production system, resulting in more efficient conversion of feed to raw milk and higher production rates per cow compared to our peers in the region.
•In our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, our sugarcane cluster, composed of the Ivinhema and Angélica mills: (i) has a highly mechanized planting and harvesting operation, which has increased our sugarcane production, reduced our operating costs and contributed to environmental sustainability by eliminating the need to burn the sugarcane before harvest; (ii) has the capacity to use all the bagasse (a by-product of the sugar and ethanol production process) that is produced, with almost no incremental cost, to cogenerate 225 MW of clean and renewable energy; (iii) can process 54,480 tons of sugarcane juice or diluted molasses. Initially, we process the sugarcane used in ethanol production the same way that we process it for sugar production. The molasses resulting from this process is mixed with clear juiceper day and then with yeast in fermentation vats,(iv) can recycle by-products such as filter cake and the resulting wine has an ethanol content of approximately 8% to 10%. After the fermentation is complete, the yeast is separated for recycling in the ethanol production process. We distill the wine to obtain hydrous ethanol. In order to produce anhydrous ethanol, hydrous ethanol undergoes a dehydration process in a molecular sieve. The liquid remaining after these processes is called vinasse, which we further process to make liquid organic fertilizer that we useby using them as fertilizers in our sugarcane plantations.fields, as well as recycling water and other effluents, generating important savings in input costs and protecting the environment.
•Unique diversification model to mitigate cash flow volatility. We pursue a unique, multi-tier diversification strategy to reduce our exposure to production and market fluctuations that may impact our cash flow and operating results. We seek geographic diversification by spreading our portfolio of farmland and agro-industrial assets across different regions of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, thereby lowering our risk exposure to weather-related losses and contributing to stable
Cogenerationcash flows. Additionally, we produce a variety of products including soybeans, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower, cotton, barley, sorghum, rice, raw milk, sugar, ethanol and energy, which lowers our risk exposure to potentially depressed market conditions of any specific product. Moreover, through vertical integration in the Rice, Dairy and the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy businesses, we process and transform a portion of our agricultural commodities into branded retail products, reducing our commodity price risk and our reliance on the standard market distribution channels for unprocessed products. Finally, our commercial committee defines our commercial policies based on market fundamentals and logistical and production data to develop a customized sale/hedge risk management strategy for each product.
•Expertise in acquiring farmland with transformation and appreciation potential. Since our inception in 2002, we have executed transactions for the purchase and disposition of land for over US$780 million and sold over 100,000 hectares of developed land, generating capital gains of approximately US$250 million. We believe we have a superior track record and have positioned ourselves as a key player in the land business in South America. Our business development team has gained extensive expertise in evaluating and acquiring farmland throughout South America and has a solid understanding of the productivity potential of each region and of the potential for land transformation and appreciation. To date, we have analyzed over 11 million hectares of farmland spread throughout the regions in which we operate and other productive regions in the world. We have developed a methodology to assess farmland and to appraise its potential value with a high degree of accuracy and efficiency by using information generated through sophisticated technology, including satellite images, rain and temperature records, soil analyses, and topography and drainage maps. Our management team has gained extensive experience in transforming and maximizing the appreciation potential of our land portfolio through the implementation of our agribusiness techniques described above. We also have an extensive track record of rotating our asset portfolio to generate capital gains and monetize the transformation and appreciation generated through our land transformation activities and agricultural operations.
•Experienced management team and knowledgeable employees. Our personnel are our most important asset. We have an experienced senior management team with an average of more than 20 years of experience working in our sector and a solid track record of implementing and executing large-scale growth projects, such as land transformations, greenfield developments of industrial plants, and integrating acquisitions within our organization. Recruiting technically qualified employees at each of our farms and operating sites is a main focus of our senior management and a key to our success.
Our Business Strategy
We generate electricity from sugarcane bagasse (the fiber portionintend to maintain our position as a leading agricultural company in South America by expanding and consolidating each of sugarcane that remains after the extractionour business lines, creating value for our shareholders. The key elements of sugarcane juice)our business strategy are as follows:
•Expand our Farming business through organic growth, leasing andstrategic acquisitions. We will continue to seek opportunities for organic growth, target attractive acquisition and leasing opportunities and strive to maximize operating synergies and achieve economies of scale in each of our three millsmain Farming business areas (crops, rice and dairy). We believe that the execution risk associated with these projects will not be significant as we are investing in existing operations that are highly efficient. Moreover, our expected results do not rely exclusively on rising commodity prices, which we expect to remain flat.
•Crops: In February 2019, we acquired a state-of-the-art peanut processing facility strategically located in Brazil.Córdoba province, Argentina’s largest peanut production area. This plant is equipped with high-performance equipment and comprises a shelling plant, a blanching plant and a seed treatment plant. It has a shelling capacity of 80,000 tons per year, a blanching capacity of 36,000 tons per year, and a storage capacity of 50,000 tons of in-shell peanuts (which will increase to 67,000 by the end of 2022). Moreover, we recently expanded our finished products storage capacity from 7,500 tons to 10,000 tons (4,200 of which are under cold storage). The plant also has a drying capacity of 1,200 tons (at a 14% input moisture). The plant has been granted all necessary certifications and permits, which allow us to satisfy demand in selective global markets that pay a premium for Argentine peanut because of its superior quality. Our increased focus in the segment will allow us to reduce costs by (i) saving in tolling and brokerage fees, (ii) consolidating and exporting our production from our on-site customs, (iii) reducing operational risks and (iv) having access to land at competitive prices by managing crop rotation ourselves, among others.
•Rice: We completed investments in the segment that have enabled us to increase productivity at the farm level, improve our rice processing and distribution capabilities, and increase the value of main by-products. Some of our investments in this segment include: (i) the implementation of zero-level technology in over 30,000 hectares, which has considerably reduced water consumption at the farm, and increased yields by providing better germination, uniform irrigation and lower losses during harvest; (ii) the increased use of our own machinery for planting and harvesting activities, which has allowed us to seek optimal harvest timing; and (iii) the installation of an on-site dryer at our Oscuro farm, which added efficiency to our grain storage and handling and reduced transportation and other costs. At the industrial level, we constructed a parboil plant that has allowed us to increase our processing volume and produce a higher-margin product.
•Dairy: As of December 31,2021, we had four fully operative free-stall facilities with an occupancy of 13,742 cows. We continue with our strategy of growing and securing corn silage to feed additional cows. As for the biodigester, energy production is stabilized and generating attractive results.
Additionally, since February 2019 total installed cogenerationwe are owners of two milk processing facilities acquired from SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitadas. Both plants are well equipped and strategically located. The facility located in the city of Morteros, Province of Córdoba, is at the center of Argentina’s largest dairy basin and has a processing capacity reached 232MW, of 840 thousand liters per day aimed at producing powdered milk and cheese, mainly destined to the export market. The facility located in Chivilcoy, in the province of Buenos Aires, is halfway between our dairy free-stall facilities and the city of Buenos Aires, the largest fluid dairy market. The processing capacity of this facility is 555.000 liters per day aimed at producing mostly fluid milk. These acquisitions are part of our long term growth strategy, consistent with our strategy for our crops, rice, sugar, ethanol, and energy businesses. We believe that being vertically integrated allows us to control the supply chain, which 167MW are available for resalein turn enhances efficiencies and increases margins, and provides us with the flexibility to third parties after supplying our mills’ energy requirements. The abilitysell into the export and domestic markets, based on relative profitability with a view to generate electricity fromattractive returns.
• Consolidate our sugar and ethanol cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul. Our main strategy for our sugar and ethanol business is to consolidate our cluster in the by-productstate of Mato Grosso do Sul in Brazil by ramping up production at our Ivinhema and Angelica mills, which have a nominal capacity of 13 million tons per year. See “ —Operations and Principal Activities—Sugar, Ethanol and Energy—Our Mills.” The consolidation of the cluster has generated important synergies, operating efficiencies and economies of scale such as (i) a reduction in the average distance from sugarcane crushing process onfields to mills, generating important savings in sugarcane transportation expenses; (ii) a single centralized management team, reducing total administration cost per ton of sugarcane milled; and (iii) a large enoughsugarcane plantation supplying two mills, which permits non-stop harvesting. Our sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul has allowed us to become one of the most efficient and low cost producers of sugar, ethanol and energy in Brazil. Additionally, we plan to continue to monitor closely the Brazilian sugar and ethanol industries and may pursue selective acquisitions that provide opportunities to increase our economies of scale, operating synergies and profitability.
We remain focused on finding ways to continue maximizing efficiency and generating additional synergies and cost dilution. In this process, our operating teams identified certain bottlenecks in our industrial operations that were removed with minimal investments and allowed us to increase crushing volumes per hour and total capacity per year. In 2021, we inaugurated a molecular sieve at our Ivinhema mill, which increased our ethanol dehydration capacity by 50%. Prior to this investment, the only mill capable of producing anhydrous ethanol was the Angelica mill. This increase in our dehydration capacity is as a commercial tool that enhances the efficiency and sustainability of our operations and increases our production flexibility. Combined with our high ethanol storage capacity, it enables us to carry over stocks and places us in a solid position to benefit from higher expected prices.
• Further increase our operating efficiencies while maintaining a diversified portfolio. We intend to continue to focus on improving the efficiency of our operations and maintaining a low-cost structure to increase our profitability and protect our cash flows from commodity price cycle risk. We seek to maintain our low-cost platform by (i) making additional investments in advanced technologies, including those related to agricultural, industrial and logistical processes and information technology, (ii) improving our economies of scale through organic growth, strategic acquisitions, and more efficient production methods, and (iii) fully powerutilizing our resources to increase our production margins. In addition, we intend to mitigate commodity price cycle risk and minimize our exposure to weather related losses by (a) maintaining a mill with excess electricity being availablediversified product mix and vertically integrating production of certain commodities and (b) geographically diversifying the locations of our farms.
• Continue to implement our land transformation strategy. We plan to continue to enhance the value of our owned farmland and future land acquisitions by making them suitable for more profitable agricultural activities, thereby seeking to maximize the return on our invested capital in our land assets. In addition, we expect to continue rotating our land
portfolio through strategic dispositions of certain properties in order to realize and monetize the transformation and appreciation value created by our land transformation activities. We also plan to leverage our knowledge and experience in land asset- management to identify superior buying and selling opportunities.
Operations and Principal Activities
Farming Business
Our Farming business is referred to as having full cogeneration capacity. Ourdivided into three mills are duly licensed by the Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (“ANEEL”) to generatemain reportable operating businesses: Crops, Rice and sell electricity.Dairy. We conduct our Farming operations on our own land and on land leased from third parties. During the 2020/2021 harvest year, ended December 31, our Farming operations were conducted on 262,110 hectares of land; of this land, 111,009 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) were owned by us, 41,924 hectares were second harvest areas, and 109,178 hectares were leased. During the 2019/2020 harvest year, our Farming operations were conducted on 237,806 hectares of land; of this land, 105,883 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) were owned by us, 34,556 were second harvest areas, and 97,367 hectares were leased. During the 2018/2019 2018harvest year, we conducted our Farming operations on 225,115 hectares of land; of this, 107,681 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) were owned by us, 31,127 were second harvest areas, and 2017 we sold 994,367 MWh, 772,681 MWh86,307 hectares were leased.
The following table sets forth our production volumes for each of our farming business lines.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Harvest Year |
| | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| Production | | (in tons) |
| Crops (tons) (1) | | 733,334 | | | 720,059 | | | 652,169 | |
| Rice (tons) (2) | | 346,685 | | | 278,348 | | | 239,779 | |
| Total | | 1,080,019 | | | 998,407 | | | 891,948 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Dairy (thousands of liters)(3) | | 173,148 | | | 145,192 | | | 120,069 | |
(1) Crop production does not include 300,782 tons, 226,821 tons, and 860,814 MWh212,650 tons of forage produced in the 2020/2021, 2019/2020 and 2018/2019 harvest years, respectively. It also does not include the soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the local electricitysale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
(2) Expressed in tons of rough rice.
(3) Raw milk produced.
Crops Business (Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton)
Our agricultural production is mainly based on planting, growing and harvesting crops over our owned arable area. During the 2020/2021 harvest year, we planted crops on approximately 223,165 hectares, including our owned land, leased land and second harvest areas. In mid-2021, we began planting crops pertaining for the 2021/2022 harvest year, which was concluded in the first quarter of 2022, with a total planted area of 244,033 hectares (including forage). Our main products include soybean, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower and cotton. Other products, such as sorghum and barley, are sown occasionally and represent only a small percentage of total sown land.
Our crop production process is directly linked to the geo-climatic conditions of our farms and our crop cycles, which define the periods for planting and harvesting our various products. Our crop diversification and the location of our farms in various regions of South America enable us to implement an efficient planting and harvesting system throughout the year, which includes second harvests in many cases. Our production process begins with the planting of each crop. After harvesting, crops may go through a processing phase where the grains or seeds are cleaned and dried to reach the required market comprising 6.7%standards. For additional discussion on our harvest years and the presentation of production and product area information in this annual report, see "Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Fiscal Year and Harvest Year."
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the planted areas for our main products:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| Planted Area | | (in hectares) |
| Soybean (1) | | 68,315 | | | 73,685 | | | 73,309 | |
| Corn (2) | | 56,568 | | | 61,112 | | | 46,787 | |
| Wheat (3) | | 44,392 | | | 32,799 | | | 40,210 | |
| Sunflower | | 16,164 | | | 6,818 | | | 3,825 | |
| Cotton | | 3,519 | | | 4,461 | | | 5,316 | |
| Peanut | | 26,123 | | | 16,814 | | | 15,479 | |
| Others (4) | | 2,747 | | | 574 | | | 881 | |
| Forage (5) | | 5,337 | | | 6,758 | | | 5,828 | |
| Total | | 223,165 | | | 203,020 | | | 191,635 | |
(1) Includes soybean first crop and second crop planted area.
(2) Includes sorghum.
(3) Includes barley crop.
(4) Includes beans, chia and sesame.
(5) Forage includes corn silage, wheat silage and sorghum used for feeding cattle in our dairy operation.
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the production volumes for our main products:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| | | 2021/2022 | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
Production(1) | | (in tons) |
| Soybeans (2) (3) | | 1,510 | | | 172,969 | | | 181,259 | | | 187,226 | |
| Corn (2) | | 33,726 | | | 327,164 | | | 364,176 | | | 295,990 | |
| Wheat | | 137,749 | | | 122,749 | | | 104,236 | | | 114,809 | |
| Sunflower (2) | | 32,882 | | | 28,436 | | | 12,652 | | | 5,937 | |
| Cotton lint (2) | | 28 | | | 1,772 | | | 1,490 | | | 422 | |
| Peanut (2) | | — | | | 77,891 | | | 55,630 | | | 47,785 | |
| Others | | 120 | | | 2,353 | | | 616 | | | — | |
| Total (2) | | 206,015 | | | 733,334 | | | 720,059 | | | 652,169 | |
(1) Crop production does not include 300,782 tons, 226,821 tons and 212,650 tons of forage produced in the 2020/2021, 2019/2020 and 2018/2019 harvest years, respectively.
(2) As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of soybean, corn, peanut, sunflower and cotton pertaining to the 2021/2022 harvest year is ongoing. The only crop that has been fully harvested is wheat.
(3) Does not include the soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
The following table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the sales volume for our main products:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Sales | | (In thousands of US$) |
| Soybeans (5) | | 56,997 | | | 44,732 | | | 46,386 | |
| Corn (1) | | 57,504 | | | 45,088 | | | 61,332 | |
Wheat (2) | | 27,267 | | | 15,109 | | | 20,318 | |
| Sunflower | | 16,618 | | | 10,925 | | | 8,430 | |
| Peanut | | 60,422 | | | 46,983 | | | 28,994 | |
| Other crops (3) | | 10,086 | | | 7,277 | | | 3,478 | |
| Adjustments (4) | | 11,836 | | | (1,653) | | | (2,492) | |
| Total | | 240,730 | | | 168,461 | | | 166,446 | |
(1) Includes sorghum.
(2) Includes barley.
(3) Includes cotton, other crops and farming services.
(4) Refers to the accumulated adjustment of hyperinflation in the accounting translation for our Crops segment sales.
(5) Does not include revenue corresponding to the sale of soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
Soybeans
Soybeans are an annual legume widely grown due to their high content of protein (40%) and oil (20%). They have been grown for over 3,000 years in Asia and, more recently, have been successfully cultivated around the world. The world’s top producers of soybeans currently are the United States, Brazil, Argentina, China and India. Soybeans are one of the few plants that provide a complete protein supply as they contain all eight essential amino acids. About 85% of the world’s soybeans are processed, or “crushed,” annually into soybean meal and oil. Approximately 98% of soybean meal is further processed into animal feed, with the balance used to make soy flour and proteins. Of the oil content, 85% is consumed as edible oil and the rest is used for industrial products such as fatty acids, soaps and biodiesel. We sell our soybeans mainly to crushing and processing industries, which produce soybean oil and soybean meal used in the food, animal feed and biofuel industries.
Soybeans comprised, 5.2%, 7.3%5.5%, and 6.7%5.1% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively.
Corn
Corn is a cereal grown around the world and is one of the world’s most widely consumed foods. The main component of corn grain is starch (72% to 73% of grain weight), followed by proteins (8% to 11%). Corn grain is directly used for food and animal feed (beef, swine and poultry meat production and dairy). Corn is also processed to make food and feed ingredients (such as high fructose corn syrup, corn starch and lysine), or industrial products such as ethanol and polylactic acid (PLA). Oil, flour and sugar are also extracted from corn, with several uses in the food, medicine and cosmetic industries. Additionally, there are specific corn types used for direct human consumption such as popcorn and sweet corn.
Corn comprised 6.9% of our consolidated sales respectively.in 2019, 5.5% of our consolidated sales in 2020, and 5.1% of our consolidated sales in 2021.
CogenerationWheat
Wheat is the world’s largest cereal-grass crop. Unlike other cereals, wheat grain contains a high amount of gluten, the protein that provides the elasticity necessary for excellent bread making. Although most wheat is grown for human consumption, other industries use small quantities to produce starch, paste, malt, dextrose, gluten, alcohol, and other products. Inferior and surplus wheat and various milling by products are used for livestock feed. We sell wheat to exporters and to local mills that produce flour for the food industry.
Wheat comprised 2.3% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 1.8% of our total consolidated sales in 2020, and 2.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2021.
Sunflower
There are two types of sunflower, the most important in terms of volume being the oilseed sunflower, which is primarily grown for the oil extracted from the seed. Sunflower oil is considered one of the top three oils for human consumption, due to its high oil content (39-49%) and its oil composition (90% of oleic and linoleic oil). The other type of sunflower is the confectionary sunflower, which is used for direct human consumption. Sunflower seeds are an exceptional source of vitamin E, omega-6 fatty acids, dietary fiber and minerals. We grow both types of sunflower.
Sunflower comprised 1.0% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 1.3% in 2020, and 1.5% in 2021.
Since early 2019, we operate a sunflower processing facility located in Buenos Aires province, Argentina. This enables us to control processing activities and develop direct and long term relationships with different customers around the world.
Peanut
Peanut is a summer legume that has its harvesting process divided in two stages: (1) digging, which implies loosening the plant, cutting the taproot and inverting the plant; and (2) combining which means separating the pods from the vines. Planting activities begin in October and approximately 150 days after planting, digging activities take place. In Argentina, all peanuts grown are high oleic. Córdoba province is Argentina's largest peanut production area due to its optimal agro-climatic conditions, which have led many processing industries to install there.
Argentina is positioned among the most important players in the production and export of peanuts, with high technological levels both in terms of production as well as processing. Argentina exports more than 90% of the peanuts it produces and its main market is the E.U., followed by Russia and Latin America. Its main competitors are the United States, Brazil and China. We grow peanuts in the center region of Argentina.
Peanut comprised 3.3% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 5.7% of our total consolidated sales in 2020 and 5.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2021.
Since early 2019, we own and operate a peanut processing facility equipped with cutting-edge technology. This vertical integration is in line with our strategy to grow our peanut business as it enables us to control processing activities and develop direct and long term relations with different customers around the world.
Forages
We are engaged in the production of forage in Argentina, including corn silage, wheat silage and sorghum silage. We use forage as cow feed in our dairy operation. During the 2020/2021 harvest year, we planted 5,337 hectares of forage and produced 300,782 tons of forage.
Rice Business
Rice is the main food staple for about half of the world’s population. Although it is cultivated in over 100 countries and on almost every continent, 90% of the world’s rice is grown and consumed in Asia. Globally, rice is the most important crop in terms of its contribution to human diets and production value. There are three main types of rice: short grain, medium grain and long grain rice. Each one has a different taste and texture. We produce long grain rice and Carolina double rice, a variety of medium grain rice.
We conduct our rice operation in the northeast of Argentina, which is one of the most efficient locations in the world for producing rice at a low cost. This is a result of optimum natural agronomic conditions, including plentiful sunlight, abundant availability of water for low cost irrigation and large quantities of land. The use of public water for artificial irrigation is governed by provincial regulations and is subject to the granting of governmental permits. We currently have permits for the use of water in our production of rice in the provinces of Corrientes and Santa Fe. Maintenance of our permits is subject to our compliance with applicable laws and regulations, which is supervised by the corresponding governmental authority (e.g., the Ministry of Water, Public Services and Environment (Ministerio de Agua, Servicios Publicos y Medio Ambiente), in the province of Santa Fe, and the Water Institute of the Province of Corrientes (Instituto Correntino del Agua).
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the total number of planted rice hectares we owned and leased as well as the overall rough rice we produced:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| Rice Product Area and Production | | 2021/2022 | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| Owned planted area (hectares) | | 43,009 | | | 40,444 | | | 39,162 | | | 37,608 | |
| Leased planted area (hectares) | | 6,031 | | | 3,839 | | | 2,382 | | | 1,700 | |
| Total rice planted (hectares) | | 49,040 | | | 44,282 | | | 41,544 | | | 39,308 | |
Rough rice production (tons) (1) | | 215,252 | | | 346,685 | | | 278,348 | | | 239,779 | |
(1) As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of rice pertaining to the 2021/2022 harvest year is ongoing.
We grow rice on four farms owned by us and four farms leased by us, all located in Argentina. In the 2018/2019 harvest year, we planted approximately 39,308 hectares and produced a total of 239,779 tons of rice, which represented 17% of our total planted area and 27% of our total farming production. In the 2019/2020 harvest year, we planted approximately 41,544 hectares and produced 278,348 tons of rice, which represented 17% of our total planted area and 28% of our total farming
production. In the 2020/2021 harvest year, we planted approximately 44,282 hectares and produced 346,685 tons of rice, which represented 17% of our total planted area and 32% of our total farming production. In the ongoing 2021/2022 harvest year, we planted approximately 49,040 hectares of rice, which have not been fully harvested as of the date of this annual report.
Rice comprised 11.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 12.5% in 2020 and 12.0% in 2021.
Rice Production Process
The rice production cycle lasts approximately five to six months, beginning in September of each year and ending in April of the following year. Rice planting continues until November, followed by treatment of the rice, which lasts approximately three months, until January. Our harvest begins in February and lasts until April. After harvesting, the rice is ready for processing.
SugarcaneWe process rice in our three rice mills in Argentina, where we are able to process our entire rice crop and utilize our excess milling capacity to process rough rice we purchase from third party growers.
At the mill, we clean the rice to remove all impurities. We then put it through a dryer to remove excess moisture from the grains. Proper drying results in increased storage life, prevents deterioration in quality and leads to optimum milling. Once dried, the rice grain, now known as rough rice or paddy rice, is composed of water, fibers, sucrose and other sugars and minerals. When the sugarcane goes throughready for storage. We store rice in elevators or in silo bags until milling. During the milling process, we separate the water, sugar and mineralsrough rice goes through a dehusking machine that removes the husk from the fiberskernel. The rice that is obtained after this process is known as brown rice and is ready for human consumption. Brown rice becomes white rice after it is polished to remove the excess bran.
The main objective of the milling process is to remove the husk and the bran, preserving the quality of the whole grain. Although the process is highly automated and uses advanced technology, some rice grains are broken in the process. The percentage of broken rice depends on a number of factors such as the crop development cycle at the farm, the variety of the grain, the handling and the industrial process. Average processing of rough rice results in 58.5% white rice, 13.0% broken rice, 20.0% rice husk and 8.5% bran rice, which is sold for use as cattle feed or sugarcane bagasse. Bagassefloor bedding in the poultry business.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Processed Rice Production | | (in tons) |
| Rough rice processed — own | | 306,602 | | | 263,637 | | | 250,427 | |
| Rough rice processed — third party | | 12,130 | | | 26,393 | | | 24,920 | |
| Total rough rice processed | | 318,732 | | | 290,030 | | | 275,347 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Processed Rice Sales | | (in thousands of $) |
| Total Sales | | 134,869 | | | 101,862 | | | 101,156 | |
Rice comprised 11.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 12.5% in 2020 and 12.0% in 2021.
Rice Seed Production
In our rice seed facility in Argentina, we are involved in the genetic development of new rice varieties adapted to local conditions to increase rice productivity and quality to improve both farm production as well as the manufacturing process. In connection with these efforts, we have entered into agreements with selected research and development institutions such as the National Institute of Agriculture Technology (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, or “INTA”) in Argentina, the Instituto Riograndense do Arroz or “IRGA” in Brazil, the Híbridos de Arroz para América Latina or “HIAA” in Colombia, the Latin American Fund for Irrigated Rice (Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego, or “FLAR”) in Colombia, the Santa Catarina State Agricultural Research and Rural Extension Agency (Empresa de pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina, or “EPAGRI”) in Brazil and Badische Anilin- und Soda-Fabrik (“BASF”) in Germany. Our own technical team is continuously testing and developing new rice varieties. Our first rice seed variety, Ita Caabo 105, was released to the market in 2008. In 2011 we released our second variety Ita Caabo 110, and at the beginning of 2014 we released our third variety, Ita Caabo 107. We are currently experimenting with a wide range of varieties to continue improving our productivity in addition to the development of a hybrid line. These seeds are both used at our farms and sold to rice farmers in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay
and Paraguay. We are also developing, alongside BASF, a herbicide-tolerant rice variety to assist in the control of harmful weeds.
Dairy Business
We conduct our dairy operation in our farms located in the Argentine humid pampas region. This region is one of the best places in the world for producing raw milk at a low cost, due to the availability of grains and forages produced efficiently and at low cost, and due to the favorable weather for cow comfort and productivity. Our dairy operation consists of four free-stall dairy facilities with an important sub-productoccupancy of sugarcane,13,742 milking cows as of December 2021, and a total capacity of 14,400.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated below, the total number of our dairy cows, average daily milk production per cow and our total milk production:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Dairy Herd & Production | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Total dairy herd (head) (1) | | 13,742 | | | 11,477 | | | 9,781 | |
Average milking cows (2) | | 12,942 | | | 10,876 | | | 9,066 | |
Average daily production (liters per cow) (2) | | 36.7 | | | 36.5 | | | 36.3 | |
| Total production (thousands of liters) | | 173,148 | | | 145,192 | | | 120,069 | |
(1) As of December.
(2) Annual average.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31 |
| Dairy Sales | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | (In thousands of $) |
| Sales | | 183,054 | | | 133,474 | | | 83,822 | |
Dairy comprised 9.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 16.3% for 2020 and 16.3% for 2021 respectively.
Our four free-stall dairy facilities are fully ramped up and are delivering high productivity levels. In 2020, we began the construction of our fourth free-stall facility, which was finalized in February 2021 and will allow us to reach a capacity of over 14,000 total milking cows. We believe this investment is a unique opportunity to leverage Argentina’s competitive advantages in transforming vegetable protein into milk protein, our operational expertise, and the positive outlook for global and local milk prices.
We own two milk processing facilities acquired from SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitadas in February 2019, in addition to the Las Tres Niñas and Angelita trademarks, both of which are well-known in Argentina and represent a solid sales vehicle for retail and consumer dairy products. Our milk facilities produce UHT and UP milk, powdered milk and semi-hard cheese, among others. Our facilities have a total installed reception capacity of 2.4 million liters per day and an installed processing capacity of 1.4 million liters of raw milk per day. To account for the difference between total installed capacity and actual utilization, we must account for the efficiency rate of our machines, maintenance works, number of working days and number of personnel shifts, among other variables. In 2021, we processed 352.5 million liters of raw milk.
Our Chivilcoy industrial facility is located in the city of Chivilcoy, in the province of Buenos Aires, and is primarily focused on fluid milk production for the domestic market. It has an installed processing capacity of 555,000 liters per day and an installed milk reception capacity of 1.2 million liters per day. The facility has an installed processing capacity of 510,000 liters of UHT milk and 45,000 liters of yogurt, cream and cocoa flavored milk. In 2021, we processed 112.4 million liters of raw milk in the Chivilcoy facility.
Our Morteros industrial facility is located in the city of Morteros, in the province of Córdoba, and produces powdered milk and semi-hard cheese primarily for the export market. Morteros plant has an installed processing capacity of 840,000 liters per day (550,000 liters for milk powdered and 290,000 liters for cheese), and it has an installed milk reception capacity of 1.2 million liters per day. In 2021, we processed 235.7 million liters of raw milk in the Morteros facility.
Dairy Production Process
We wean calves during the 24 hours subsequent to birth and during the next 60 days raise them on pasteurized milk and high protein meal. Male calves are fed concentrates and hay for an additional three months in the farm before they are sent to
our feedlot or to third party feedlots to be fattened for sale. Young heifers remain in open corrals during the next 13 months where they are fed with concentrates and forage until they are ready for breeding. Calving occurs nine months later. Heifers are subsequently milked for an average of 320 days. Dairy cows are once again inseminated during the 42 to 90-day period following calving. This process is used as fuelrepeated once a year for the boilersa period of three or four years. The pregnancy rate for our herd is between 85% and 90% per year.
Each cow in our mills. Sugarcane bagassedairy herd is burnedmechanically milked three times a day. The milk obtained is cooled to less than four degrees centigrade in order to preserve its quality and is then stored in a tank, or directly loaded to trucks which derives in increased quality and lower costs. Milk is delivered mainly to our state-of-the-art boilers to produce high pressure steam (67 atm) which is used in our high-efficiency turbo-generators to generate electricity to power our mills. The excess electricity, about 72% of production,processing facilities and the balance is sold to large third party milk processing facilities on a daily basis by tank trucks. We feed our dairy cows mainly with corn and alfalfa silages, some grass and corn grain, supplemented as needed with soybean by-products, hay, vitamins and minerals.
We have invested in technology to improve the national power grid.genetics of our cows, animal health and feeding in order to enhance our milk production. These investments include top quality imported semen from genetically improved North American Holstein bulls, agricultural machinery and devices, use of dietary supplements and modern equipment to control individual milk production and cooling. Our feeding program is focused on high conversion of feed into milk, while maintaining cows in good health and comfort. We have also invested in technology and know-how so as to increase our forage production and utilization.
The following flow chart demonstratesImplementation of the sugar, ethanolfree-stall system allows us to position ourselves as a key player in the dairy industry and cogenerationboost our agricultural and industrial integration presence in the South American agricultural sector. By eliminating cow grazing, we reduced the amount of land utilized for milk production, process:
Historically,which freed up more land for our agricultural and land development activities. Cow productivity (measured in liters of milk produced per day) using the energy producedfree-stall system increases by Brazilian mills has not been price competitive whenup to 40% compared to traditional grazing systems. These productivity gains are because the free-stall system significantly improves the conversion rate of animal feed to milk, resulting in an approximate 40% increase in the conversion ratio, or the production of 1.4 liters of milk for each 1 kg of animal feed as compared to the low-cost Brazilian hydro-electricity,average of 1 liter of milk for each 1 kg of feed associated with the usual grazing model.
This increased productivity and conversion rate are primarily due to improved cow comfort and an enhanced diet quality. We assess cow comfort through the engagement of expert consultants, who recommended designing beds covered with sand. The sand plays a significant role in helping cows to rest comfortably. Additionally, we installed a cooling system to increase cow comfort as well. This system relies on water sprinklers and ventilation fans located all over the facility to create a controlled, cool atmosphere, which accounts for almost 90%improves cow comfort as the Holstein herd is originally adapted to cold regions. Additionally, we manage diet quality by adapting our feeding regime based on the various feeding stages in the lifetime of each cow. The actual feeding is fully mechanized, and we carefully control the harvesting and storage of feed. The control of all productivity variables, such as reproduction, health and operations, supports efficiency gains through standardized processes. Finally, the physical concentration of the country’s electricity matrix. Consequently, the majorityanimals facilitates efficient overall management of the groupsDairy business as a whole. In terms of the environment, the free-stall model allows for a better effluent treatment, which includes a sand-manure separator stage, a decantation pool and an anaerobic lagoon. All these processes help to decrease the organic matter content of the effluent and deliver a cleaner output. The final treated effluent is used to fertigate crops adjacent to the dairy operation. Accordingly, we transform dairy waste into a high value-added by-product, which reduces fertilizer usage.
During October 2017, we completed the construction of our first biodigester. This facility enhances the sustainability of our free-stall dairy operation by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving the effluent management and concentrating valuable nutrients which are applied back to the fields. It generates electricity by burning biogas extracted from the effluents produced by our milking cows. On November 3, 2017, we began generating and delivering 1.4 MW of electricity to the local power grid. In addition to enhancing in the sugarsustainability of our diary operation, it increases revenues and ethanol sector havesecures our energy requirements.
All Other Segments
All Other Segments primarily encompass our cattle business. Our cattle segment consists of pasture land that is not invested in expanding their energy generationsuitable for sale,crop production due to soil quality and the majorityis leased to third parties for cattle grazing activities.
We currently own 55,509 hectares of the mills were constructed with less efficient, low-pressure boilers. Since 2000, the Brazilian economy has experienced significant growth, which in turn has resulted in increased demand for energy.
However, hydro- and thermo-electricity have not been able to keep pace for the following reasons: (1) new hydro-electric plants arecattle grazing land located in regions (such as the Amazon) distant from consumption centers; (2) significant lead-time is required to constructArgentine provinces of Corrientes, Santa Fe, Formosa and Santiago del Estero. In 2021, we entered into new hydro- and thermo-electric plants; (3) significant investments are requiredlease agreements with third-party cattle farmers for transmission lines, pipelines (for natural gas used in thermo-electric plants) and barges; (4) significant environmental costs are associated with both typesa total area of electricity14,935 hectares.
generation; and (5) prices for fuel (natural gas) used in the generation of thermo-electricity have increased resulting in greater dependence on Bolivia (Brazil’s principal natural gas supplier). As a result, energy prices in Brazil have been increasing, and alternative sources, such as the electricity from the cogeneration of sugarcane bagasse, have become increasingly competitive and viable options to satisfy the increasing energy demands. Sugarcane bagasse cogeneration is particularly competitive since sugarcane-based electricity is generated following the sugarcane harvest and milling which occurs during the dry season in Brazil, when hydroelectric generation is at its lowest levels.
The main advantages of energy generated by sugarcane bagasse are:
It is a clean and renewable energy;
It complements hydropower, the main source of Brazilian energy, as it is generated during the sugarcane harvest period (April to December) when water reservoirs are at their lowest level;
It requires a short period of time to start operations; and
It requires only a small investment in transmission lines when plants are located close to consumer centers.
As of December 2019, our total installed cogeneration capacity at our cluster and UMA mill was 216MW and 16MW respectively, of which 155MW and 12MW are available to sell to the market.
We believe that there is a high potential for growth in the generation of electricity, and we are prepared to make investments to the extent economically viable.
Storage and Conditioning for the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy businessFarming Business
Our sugar and ethanol storage and conditioning facilities are located at our mill sites andin the Farming business allow us to condition, store and deliver our products when they are ready to be commercialized with no third-party involvement. Having suchAll our crop storage facilities at mill sites allowsare located close to our farms, allowing us to (i) reduce storage and conditioning costs; (ii) reduce freight costs since we only commence moving the product once the final destination is determined, whether locally or to a port; and (iii) capitalize on fluctuations in the prices of sugarcommodities; and ethanol.(iv) improve commercial performance by mixing grains to avoid discounts due to substandard quality.
We own two conditioning and storage facilities for grains and oilseeds, with a total built storage capacity of 37,000 tons. One of our facilities has a capacity of 12,500 tons and is located in the province of Santa Fe, Argentina, in the town of Christophersen. It has a railway loading terminal, providing logistical flexibility and savings. Our other facility is located in Buenos Aires province close to Bahía Blanca’s deep water port, in an area where we produce 120,000 tons of grains. In addition, our peanut processing facility has the capacity to store 10,000 tons of finished product (and 50,000 of in-shell product), while our sunflower processing facility has the capacity to store 4,000 tons of sunflower. We also own in Argentina three rice mills, which account for over 126,500 tons of total storage capacity, and one additional conditioning facility for rice handling, with a total storage capacity of 6,300 tons.
The table below sets forth our storage capacity as of December 31, 2021:
| | | | | | | | |
| Storage Capacity | | Nominal |
| Crops (tons) (1) | | 51,000 |
| Rice (tons) | | 132,800 |
| Dairy (liters) (2) | | 25,800,000 |
(1) Includes 37,000 tons corresponding to our two conditioning and storage facilities, 10,000 tons to our peanut facility and 4,000 tons to our sunflower facility.
(2) The Morteros facility accounts for 24.3 million liters of fluid milk (equivalent to 2,500 tons of milk powder and 360 tons of cheese) while the Chivilcoy accounts for 1.5 million liters of fluid milk.
In addition, we use silo bags to increase our storage capacity at a low cost. Silo bags are an efficient low-cost method for grain storage. As crops are harvested, they are placed inside large polyethylene bags that can be left in the fields for approximately 12 months without damaging the grain. Each silo bag can hold up to 180 to 200 tons of product, depending on the type of grain. During the 2020/2021 harvest year, we stored approximately 50% of our grain production through silo bags.
Silo bags offer important operational and logistic advantages, such as (i) low cost storage; (ii) flexible and scalable capacity that is adapted based on production and commercial strategy; (iii) harvest efficiencies since the bags are filled on the field allowing for a non-stop harvest operation regardless of any logistical setbacks; (iv) logistic efficiencies leading to lower freight since grains are transported during the off-season when truck fares are lower; (v) increased ability to monitor quality and identify different grain qualities, since grains are stored in relatively small amounts (200 tons) and easily monitored, maximizing our commercial performance; and (vi) better use of our drying capacity throughout the year. Silo bags are commercially accepted. Grains stored in silo bags can be sold in the market, and if such grains are to be delivered post-harvest, we charge storage costs. Additionally, we can store grains to be used as seed during the following season (soybeans, rice and wheat), achieving quality seed management. We have expanded the use of silo bags from Argentina to our operations in Brazil and Uruguay.
Grain conditioning facilities at our farms allow our trade desk to optimize commercialization costs and to achieve commercial quality standards and avoid price discounts. These facilities are operated to dry, clean, mix and separate different qualities of each grain in order to achieve commercial standards. By mixing different batches of a same grain type, differentiated by quality parameters such as moisture, percentage broken, and percentage damaged, among others, we can achieve commercial standards without having to discount a lower-quality stand-alone batch. Efficient management of these facilities results in a lower cost for grain conditioning and a better achievable price.
The table below sets forth our drying capacity as of December 31, 2021:
| | | | | | | | |
| Drying Capacity | | Nominal |
| Crops (tons/day) (1) | | 9,925 |
| Rice (tons/day) | | 6,850 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Nominal Storage Capacity | | Cluster | | UMA | | Total |
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 240,000 |
| | 27,000 |
| | 267,000 |
|
| Sugar (tons) | | 110,000 |
| | 24,900 |
| | 134,900 |
|
Some grains such as soybeans, wheat and rice, can be used for seed during the next planting season. We produce almost 97% of the seed used for planting these crops in our fields. The seed is stored in silo bags and/or grain facilities, where it can be processed, classified, and prepared for planting during next crop season. A deep survey and monitoring process is carried out in order to evaluate, control and deliver high quality seed to our farms.
The rest of our seed requirements are purchased from seed suppliers in order to incorporate new enhanced varieties into our planting plan.
Marketing, Sales and Distribution for the Farming Business
Crops
In Argentina, grain prices are based on the market prices quoted on Argentine grain exchanges, such as the Bolsa de Cereales de Buenos Aires and the Bolsa de Cereales de Rosario, which use as a reference the prevailing prices in international grain exchanges (including CBOT and ICE-NY). In Uruguay, local prices are based on an export parity (during harvest) or import parity in the case of post-harvest sales, which, in each case, takes into account the prices and costs associated with each market. In Brazil, the grain market includes the Bolsa de Mercadorias e Futuros (the Brazilian Grain Exchange), which, as in Argentina, uses as a price reference the international grain exchanges (including CBOT and ICE-NY). Prices are quoted in relation to the month of delivery and the port in which the product is to be delivered. Different conditions in price, such as terms of storage and shipment, are negotiated between us and the end buyer. We negotiate sales with the top traders and industrial companies in our markets. We also engage in hedging positions by buying and selling futures and options in commodities exchanges, including the Chicago Board of Trade, the New York Board of Trade, the B3, and the Mercado aTérmino de Buenos Aires (MATBA).
Soybeans
Our soybean crop is sold to local companies and is ultimately exported or diverted to the crushing industry. Approximately 63% of the soybean crop was hedged pre-harvest, by forward sales and sales in the futures markets. Harvest and post-harvest sales are a function of the export market versus local premiums paid by crushers (oil, meal and biodiesel) and logistics considerations. Our five largest customers accounted for approximately 82% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Corn
Our production is mainly destined to the export market. Our five largest customers comprised approximately 79% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Wheat
Our wheat production is mainly destined to export industry. Quality segregation allows us to negotiate premiums with the millers and export market. Brazil is the main importer of Argentine wheat. Our five largest customers comprised approximately 79% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Sunflower
Our sunflower production from Argentina is sold to local companies. Our four largest customers comprised 95% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Peanut
Approximately 95% of our peanut production is exported. Our 10 largest customers comprised approximately 65% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021, while the European Union was the destination for over 85% of our sales.
Cotton
We typically make pre-harvest sales of cotton fiber produced in Argentina into the export market. Sales for the textile industry are based on domestic demand and premiums. Our two largest customers comprised approximately 100% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021. Cotton seed is sold in the domestic market to meet feed demand.
Customers
We sell manufactured and agricultural products to a large base of customers. The type and class of customers may differ depending on our business segments, regions and some logistics issues that are very important in our decision making. In
the year ended December 31, 2021, more than 90% of our sales of crops were sold to 10 well-known customers, both international and local. Of these customers, the first five cases represented almost 70% of our sales and the remaining five customers represented approximately 20% of our net sales in 2021.
Rice
Rough rice is available for sale commencing after the harvest of each year. White rice availability is based on our milling capacity. 83% of our total rice production is sold into the export market, with the remainder sold in Argentina in the retail market. We export approximately 34% of our exported volume to the European Union, 25% to Cuba, 14% to Mexico; and the balance to the Middle East, Brazil, Chile and other Central American countries. We sell approximately 17% of our rice in the Argentine retail market through three brands, which collectively have a 15.8% market share. Local rice prices are driven by regional supply demand and other world export prices. Our six largest customers for rice in the retail market accounted for approximately 53% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Dairy
In 2021, 73% of our raw milk production was destined to our processing facilities, while the majority of the balance was sold to a single dairy producer. We negotiate the price of raw milk on a monthly basis in accordance with domestic supply and demand. The price of the milk we sell is mainly based on the percentage of fat and protein that it contains and the temperature at which it is cooled. The price of milk also rises or falls based on the content of bacteria and somatic cells. We are one of the top 10 dairy processors in Argentina, considering our free-stall production of over 500,000 liters per day and the raw milk we source from 140 farmers (123 in Morteros and 17 in Chivilcoy).
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy businessBusiness
Sugar: We sellThe following table sets forth a breakdown of our production volumes by product for the years indicated in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Sugar (tons) (1) | | 546,819 | | | 646,981 | | | 213,256 | |
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 534,603 | | | 502,170 | | | 756,494 | |
| Energy (MWh exported) | | 730,739 | | | 717,915 | | | 853,139 | |
(1) Includes 4,145 tons of organic sugar bothin 2021, 8,659 tons in 2020 and 1,783 tons in 2019.
The following table sets forth our sales for each of the sugarcane by-products we produce for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | (In thousands of $) |
| Sugar | | 208,365 | | | 171,102 | | | 97,710 | |
| Ethanol | | 291,883 | | | 199,062 | | | 373,847 | |
| Energy | | 48,017 | | | 41,169 | | | 59,701 | |
| Other | | 13,745 | | | 126 | | | 525 | |
| Total | | 562,010 | | | 411,459 | | | 531,783 | |
Sugarcane
Sugarcane is a tropical grass that grows best in locations with stable, warm temperatures and high humidity, although cold and dry winters are an important factor for the sucrose concentration of sugarcane. The climate and topography of the center-south region of Brazil is ideal for the cultivation of sugarcane and accounts for approximately 85% of Brazil's sugarcane production. Sugarcane is the most efficient agricultural raw material used in the domesticproduction of sugar and ethanol. Ethanol produced from sugarcane is highly regarded as an environmentally friendly biofuel with the following characteristics.
Renewable: Sugarcane ethanol, unlike coal or oil, which can be depleted, is produced from sugarcane plants that grow back year after year, provided that they are replanted every five to seven years.
Sustainable: Sugarcane only needs to be replanted every five to seven years, as a semi-perennial crop. It can be harvested without uprooting the plant, and therefore its cultivation has less of an impact on the soil and the international markets.surrounding environment. The domestic sales are processedmechanization of the harvesting and planting process further improves sustainable agricultural management.
Energy Efficient: Sugarcane is highly efficient in converting sunlight, water and carbon dioxide into stored energy. The energy output of sugarcane is equal to nine times the energy input used in the production process, whereas the energy output of corn ethanol is only about 1.9 to 2.3 times the energy input used in its production process. Sugarcane produces seven times more energy compared to corn used for ethanol production.
Low Carbon Emissions: Compared to gasoline, sugarcane ethanol reduces greenhouse gases by our own brand called “Monte Alegre”more than 61%, which is establishedthe greatest reduction of any other liquid biofuel produced today in large quantities. Ethanol made from sugarcane is deemed an advanced biofuel by the United States EPA.
Synergies: The main raw material used in the production of electricity in sugar mills is bagasse, which is a by-product of the sugarcane milling process, allowing for a renewable source of co-generated electricity.
Sugarcane is a tropical grass that grows best in locations with stable, warm temperatures and high humidity, although cold and dry winters are an important factor for the sucrose concentration of sugarcane. The climate and topography of the center-south region of Brazil is ideal for the cultivation of sugarcane and accounts for approximately 85% of Brazil’s sugarcane production.
As of December 31, 2021, our sugarcane plantations consisted of 185,806 hectares of sugarcane planted in Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso do Sul in Brazil. Approximately 96% of our sugarcane is planted over land leased through agricultural partnerships. Under these agreements, our partners lease land to us for periods of between one and two sugarcane cycles, equivalent to periods of between seven to 14 years, on which we cultivate the sugarcane. Lease payments are based on the market value of the sugarcane set forth by the regulations of the State of São Paulo Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Growers Council (Conselho dos Produtores deCana-de-Açúcar, Açúcar e Álcool do Estado de São Paulo) or “Consecana”. We planted and harvested approximately 96% of the total sugarcane we milled during 2021, with the remaining 4% purchased directly from third parties at prices also determined by the Consecana system, based on the sucrose content of the cane and the prices of sugar and ethanol. The following table sets forth a breakdown during the time periods indicated of the amount of sugarcane we milled that was grown on our owned and leased land or purchased from third parties:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (In tons) |
| Grown on our owned and leased land | | 10,479,720 | | 10,464,893 | | 10,411,801 |
| Purchased from third parties | | 460,587 | | 638,307 | | 433,335 |
| Total | | 10,940,307 | | 11,103,200 | | 10,845,136 |
Sugarcane Harvesting Cycle
The annual sugarcane harvesting period in the center-south region of Brazil begins in April and ends in November/December of each year. In Mato Grosso do Sul, where our cluster is located, the weather pattern is less seasonal than in Sao Paulo. Our wet season is dryer and our dry season is more humid than traditional sugarcane regions. As a consequence of this weather pattern, the sugar content, or “TRS,” gap between the beginning and the end of the year compared to the peak of the harvest is much smaller than in São Paulo. This allows us to grow and harvest sugarcane year-round with a minimal impact on TRS.
Since the beginning of the 2016/2017 harvest year, we implemented a “non-stop” or “continuous” harvest. This means that we will harvest and crush sugarcane year-round, without stopping during the traditional off-season. This new strategy allows us to increase annual sugarcane milling and sugar, ethanol and energy production by approximately 10%. Another benefit of the system is that we produce ethanol in the off-season, when market prices usually have a high premium to prices at harvest. In addition, cogeneration efficiency is related to harvested volumes and unrelated to TRS, enabling us to utilize our cogeneration potential during the whole year. Considering that approximately 87% of total costs are fixed, this model has resulted not only in higher revenues but also in the dilution of our fixed costs.
We plant several sugarcane varieties, depending on the quality of the soil, the local microclimate and the estimated date of harvest of such area. Once planted, sugarcane can be harvested, once a year, up to six to eight consecutive years. With
each subsequent harvest, agricultural yields decrease. The plantations must be carefully managed and treated during the year in order to continue to attain sugar yields similar to a newly-planted crop.
We believe we own one of the most mechanized harvesting operations in Brazil. Our sugarcane harvesting process is currently 99% mechanized (100% at the Angélica and Ivinhema mills and 92% at the UMA mill) and the remaining 1% is harvested manually. Mechanized harvesting does not require burning prior to harvesting, significantly reducing environmental impact when compared to manual harvesting. In addition, the leaves that remain on the fields after the sugarcane has been harvested mechanically create a protective cover for the soil, reducing evaporation and protecting it from sunlight and erosion. This protective cover of leaves decomposes into organic material over time, which increases the fertility of the soil. Mechanized harvesting is more time efficient and has lower costs when compared to manual harvesting. Sugarcane is ready for harvesting when the crop’s sucrose content is at its highest level. Sucrose content and sugarcane yield (tons of cane per hectare) are important measures of productivity for our harvesting operations. Geographical factors, such as soil quality, topography and climate, as well as agricultural techniques that we implement, affect our productivity. Since most sugar mills produce both sugar and ethanol in variable mixes, the industry has adopted a conversion index for measuring sugar and ethanol production capacity, the Total Recoverable Sugar (“TRS”) index, which measures the amount of kilograms of sugar per ton of sugarcane.
During the 2021 harvest, our mills harvested sugarcane with an average TRS content of 128 kg/ton and an average yield of 69 tons of sugarcane per hectare, compared to 132 kg/ton and 79 tons per hectare in 2020, respectively.
Once sugarcane is harvested, it is transported to our mills for inspection and weighing. We utilize our own trucks and trailers for transportation purposes. The average transportation distance from the sugarcane fields to the mills is approximately 30 kilometers at the UMA mill and 33 kilometers at the Angélica and Ivinhema mills.
Our Sugar Mills
We currently own three sugar mills in Brazil—UMA, Angélica and Ivinhema. Our mills produce sugar, ethanol and energy, and have the flexibility to adjust the production mix between sugar and ethanol, to take advantage of more favorable market demand and prices at given points in time. As of December 31, 2021, our sugar mills had a total installed crushing capacity of 14.2 million tons of sugarcane, of which 13.0 million tons correspond to our sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul. As of December 31, 2021, we concluded the 2021 harvest crushing an aggregate volume of 10.9 million tons of sugarcane.
The UMA mill is located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, under which we sell traditional and has a sugarcane crushing capacity of 1.2 million tons per year, full cogeneration capacity and an associated sugar brand with strong presence in the regional retail market (Açúcar Monte Alegre). UMA is also engaged in the production of organic sugar allowing us to have a competitive advantage amongst our peers. Pricesand, in 2020, it exported product for the first time, after having received the necessary certification to export organic sugar we export are set in accordance with international market prices, which are in turn determined in accordanceto the E.U. We plant and harvest 98.5% of the sugarcane milled at UMA, with the ICE # 11 futures contracts. Forremaining 1.5% acquired from third parties. UMA concluded its harvest operations for the fiscal period ended on December 31, 2019 our largest six customers2021 season crushing 816,000 tons of sugarcane.
Angélica is an advanced mill, completed in this segment comprised approximately 80% of our sales. The remaining 20% was dispersed among several customers.
Ethanol: Almost all of our ethanol sales are2010 and located in the domestic Brazilian market givenstate of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, with a total sugarcane crushing capacity of 5.6 million tons per year. The mill is equipped with two modern high pressure boilers and three turbo-generators with the increasing demand generatedcapacity to generate approximately 105 MW of electricity through the use of sugarcane bagasse. The energy produced through this process is used to power the mill with an excess of 70 MW available for sale to the power grid. Angélica has the flexibility to vary production between ethanol and sugar from the increase in flex-fuel vehicles in Brazil and better ethanol parity at the gas stations. Around 42% of our ethanol sales are made through formal agreements. The remaining volumes are sold through daily sale orders through specialized brokerage firms or directly with distribution companies and the prices60% to 40% for these transactions are set using the CEPEA/ESALQ hydrous ethanol index as a reference. either product.
Our largest eight customers by volume comprised approximately 78% of our salesthird mill, Ivinhema, is located in the period ended December 31, 2019.
Cogeneration:We also sell electricity co-generated at ourstate of Mato Grosso do Sul, approximately 45 kilometers south of the Angelica mill. Ivinhema has a total sugarcane crushing capacity of 7.4 million tons per year. The mill is equipped with state-of-the-art technology including full cogeneration capacity, flexibility to produce sugar and ethanol millsand fully mechanized agricultural operations. Ivinhema has capacity to produce up to 371,306 tons of sugar, 371,306 cubic meters of ethanol and 612,000 MWh of energy exports.
Our Main Products
Sugar
As of December 31, 2021, our sugar production capacity was approximately 3,550 tons per day, which, in a normal year of 15,797 hours of milling, results in an annual sugar maximum production capacity of over 803,862 tons of sugar.
We produce three types of sugar: organic sugar, very high polarization, or “VHP” sugar, standard raw sugar and white crystal sugar. VHP sugar, a raw sugar with a minimum polarization of 99.00 degrees and a maximum polarization of 99.49
degrees of sucrose content, is similar to the grid. Salestype of sugar traded in major commodities exchanges, including the standard NY11 contract. The main difference between VHP sugar and NY11 raw sugar is the sugar content of VHP sugar, and it therefore commands a price premium over NY11 raw sugar. Crystal sugar is a non-refined white sugar (color 150 ICUMSA) produced directly from sugarcane juice.
As of December 31, 2021, our sugar production capacity was approximately 3,550 tons per day, which, in a normal year of 15,797 hours of milling, results in an annual sugar maximum production capacity of over 803,862 tons of sugar. Sugar sales comprised 11.0%, 20.9% and 18.5% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Sugar Production Process
There are made to commercialization companies,essentially five steps in the spot market,sugar manufacturing process. First, we crush the sugarcane to distributorsextract the sugarcane juice. We then treat the juice to remove impurities. The residue is used to make an organic compost used as fertilizer in our sugarcane fields. The juice is then boiled until the sugar crystallizes, and through government auctionssugar is then separated from the molasses (glucose which does not crystallize) by centrifugation. The resulting sugar is dried and sent to storage and/or packaging. We use the molasses in long- term contracts. Our largest six customersour production of ethanol.
On average, one metric ton of sugarcane contains 140 kilograms of TRS. While a mill can produce either sugar or ethanol, the TRS input requirements differ between these two products. On average, 1.045 kilograms of TRS equivalent are required to produce 1.0 kilogram of sugar, while the amount of TRS required to produce 1 liter of ethanol is 1.691 kilograms.
Ethanol
As of December 2021, our ethanol production capacity was approximately 3,200 cubic meters per day which, in a normal year of 15,797 hours of milling, results in maximum annual production capacity of over 738,220 cubic meters of ethanol.
We produce and sell two different types of ethanol: hydrous ethanol and anhydrous ethanol, as further described in the section below.
Ethanol sales comprised 78%42.1%, 24.3% and 26.0% of our total consolidated sales revenues in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Since 2020 as part of the period ended December 31, 2019.
The Brazilian energy agency, ANEEL, has organized yearly auctions for alternative energy and for renewable sources at favored rates. As a hedging strategy,RenovaBio program, every time we sell ethanol we have the electricity productionright to issue and sell carbon credits, which are traded on Brazil’s B3 platform. The number of our mills through long-term contracts adjusted for inflationcarbon credits that are issued are determined by reference tothe score granted by the National IndexAgency of Consumer Prices (“IPCA”).
In 2009, AngélicaPetroleum, Natural Gas & Biofuels (ANP) based on how “green” the mill operation is deemed to be. During 2021 we sold energy in a public auction carried out by Camara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica (“CCEE”), Angélica entered into a 15-year agreement with CCEE for the sale of 87,600 MWh per year503.5 thousand CBios at a ratean average price of R$285.0841.20/CBio (average net price of US$7.30 per MWh (price for year 2019)CBio). In August 2010, Angélica participated in a public auction, whereupon Angélica entered into a second 15-year agreement with CCEE starting in 2011, for the sale of 131,400 MWh per year at a rate of R$254.82 per MWh (price for year 2019). The delivery period for the first auction is May to DecemberPlease see “Our Company- 2. Sugar, Ethanol and for the second the delivery period starts in April and ends in November of each year. The rates under both agreements are adjusted annually for inflation by reference to the IPCA.Energy Business” above.
Land Transformation Business
We acquire farmland that we believe is undeveloped or underutilized. By implementing cutting-edge production technology and agricultural best practices, we render this land suitable for more productive uses, enhance yields and increase its overall value. We promote sustainable land use through our land transformation activities, which seek to promote environmentally responsible agricultural production and a balance between production and ecosystem preservation. We do not operate in heavily wooded areas or wetland areas.
Moreover, from time to time, we seek to recycle our capital by selling a portion of its fully developed farms. This allows us to monetize capital gains generated by land transformation activities and allocate our capital to acquire land with higher transformation potential or to deploy it in other businesses, thereby enhancing return on invested capital. During the 19-year period since our inception, we have effectively put into production over 171,000 hectares of land that were previously undeveloped or undermanaged. We realize and capture land transformation value through the strategic disposition of assets that have reached full development potential. We believe that the rotation of our land portfolio allows us to efficiently reallocate capital and maximize our return on invested capital. Our current land portfolio consists of 219,850 hectares (net of minority interests) distributed throughout our operating regions as follows: 93% in Argentina, 6% in Brazil, and 1% in Uruguay. During the last 15 years, we sold 25 of our fully mature farms, generating capital gains of approximately US$250 million.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data relating to our land transformation business:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Undeveloped/undermanaged land put into production (hectares) | | — | | 1,903 | | — |
| Ongoing transformation of arable land (hectares) | | 123,313 | | 123,313 | | 126,854 |
Number of farm sold (1) | | — | | 2 | | 1 |
Hectares sold (2) | | — | | 5,444 | | 6,082 |
Capital gains from the sale of land (in thousands of US$) (1) | | — | | 1,500 | | 9,376 |
(1) In 2020, we sold the Huelen farm (amounting to 4,633 hectares) and a 811 hectares plot of the Abolengo farm.
(2) Includes the sale of non-controlling interests in farmland companies.
Our Competitive Strengths
•Unique and strategic asset base. We own strategically located farmland and agro-industrial assets in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. We continuously improve our operations and practices, resulting in the reduction of operating costs and an increase in productivity and ultimately enhancing the value of our properties and generating capital gains. Our operations also benefit from strategically located industrial facilities throughout Argentina and Brazil, increasing operating efficiencies and reducing operating and logistical costs. We are vertically integrated where economics and returns are attractive, where the efficiency of our primary operation is significantly enhanced, or where lack of a competitive market results in the absence of a transparent price determination mechanism. Our diversified asset base creates valuable synergies and economies of scale, including (i) the ability to transfer the technologies and best practices that we have developed across our business lines, (ii) the ability to apply value-adding land transformation strategies to farmland in connection with our farming and sugarcane operations, and (iii) a greater ability to negotiate more favorable terms with our suppliers and customers.
Owning a significant portion of the land on which we operate is a key element of our business model.
•Low-cost production leveraging agro-ecological competitive advantages. Each of the commodity products we grow is produced in regions where agro-ecological conditions provide competitive advantages and which, through the implementation of our efficient and sustainable production model, allow us to become one of the lowest cost producers.
•Our grain and oilseed production is based in the humid Argentine pampas region, where soil fertility, regular rainfalls, temperate climate, the availability of land and the relative proximity to ports contribute to the reduced use of fertilizers and agrochemicals, high productivity and stable yields and efficient logistics, ultimately resulting in one of the lowest costs per ton of grain produced and delivered.
•Our rice operation is located in the northeast provinces of Argentina, one of the best rice farming regions in the world due to plentiful sunlight, the abundant availability of water for low-cost irrigation, and a large potential for expansion.
•Our dairy operation is situated in the humid Argentine pampas region, where cow feed (grains, oilseeds and forage) is efficiently and abundantly produced at a low cost and climate and sanitary conditions are optimal for cow comfort, which enhances productivity, cow reproduction rates and milk quality.
•We produce sugarcane in the states of Mato Grosso do Sul and Minas Gerais in Brazil, where the combination of soil and climate result in high sugarcane productivity and quality, resulting in one of the lowest production costs in the world (significantly lower than other major sugar producing regions, including India, China, the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany).
•Standardized and scalable agribusiness model applying technologicalinnovation. We have consistently used innovative production techniques to ensure that we are at the forefront of technological improvements and environmental sustainability standards in our industry. We are implementing an agribusiness model that consists of specializing our workforce and defining standard protocols to track crop development and control production variables, thereby enhancing management decision-making. We further optimize our agribusiness model through the effective implementation and constant adaptation of a portfolio of advanced agricultural and information technologies and best practices tailored to each region in which we operate and commodity we produce, allowing us to improve our crop yields, reduce operating costs and maximize margins in a sustainable manner.
•In our Farming business, we use “no-till” technology as the cornerstone of production in our Crops segment and have been able to implement this technique in areas within our production regions where it was not previously used. Furthermore, we also utilize crop rotation, second harvests, integrated pest management, balanced fertilization, water management and mechanization. Additionally, we use the silo bag storage method, utilizing large polyethylene bags with a capacity of 180 to 200 tons which can be left on the field for 12 months, resulting in low-cost, scalable and flexible storage on the field during harvest, which we believe allows us to expand our crop storage capacity at a low cost, generate important logistic and freight savings by moving our production in the off-season when freight fares are lower, and time the entry of our production into the market at optimal price points. See “—Operations and Principal Activities—Farming—Storage and Conditioning.”
•In our Dairy segment, we believe that we were the first company in South America to implement the “free-stall” production system, resulting in more efficient conversion of feed to raw milk and higher production rates per cow compared to our peers in the region.
•In our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, our sugarcane cluster, composed of the Ivinhema and Angélica mills: (i) has a highly mechanized planting and harvesting operation, which has increased our sugarcane production, reduced our operating costs and contributed to environmental sustainability by eliminating the need to burn the sugarcane before harvest; (ii) has the capacity to use all the bagasse (a by-product of the sugar and ethanol production process) that is produced, with almost no incremental cost, to cogenerate 225 MW of clean and renewable energy; (iii) can process 54,480 tons of sugarcane per day and (iv) can recycle by-products such as filter cake and vinasse, by using them as fertilizers in our sugarcane fields, as well as recycling water and other effluents, generating important savings in input costs and protecting the environment.
•Unique diversification model to mitigate cash flow volatility. We pursue a unique, multi-tier diversification strategy to reduce our exposure to production and market fluctuations that may impact our cash flow and operating results. We seek geographic diversification by spreading our portfolio of farmland and agro-industrial assets across different regions of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, thereby lowering our risk exposure to weather-related losses and contributing to stable
cash flows. Additionally, we produce a variety of products including soybeans, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower, cotton, barley, sorghum, rice, raw milk, sugar, ethanol and energy, which lowers our risk exposure to potentially depressed market conditions of any specific product. Moreover, through vertical integration in the Rice, Dairy and the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy businesses, we process and transform a portion of our agricultural commodities into branded retail products, reducing our commodity price risk and our reliance on the standard market distribution channels for unprocessed products. Finally, our commercial committee defines our commercial policies based on market fundamentals and logistical and production data to develop a customized sale/hedge risk management strategy for each product.
•Expertise in acquiring farmland with transformation and appreciation potential. Since our inception in 2002, we have executed transactions for the purchase and disposition of land for over US$780 million and sold over 100,000 hectares of developed land, generating capital gains of approximately US$250 million. We believe we have a superior track record and have positioned ourselves as a key player in the land business in South America. Our business development team has gained extensive expertise in evaluating and acquiring farmland throughout South America and has a solid understanding of the productivity potential of each region and of the potential for land transformation and appreciation. To date, we have analyzed over 11 million hectares of farmland spread throughout the regions in which we operate and other productive regions in the world. We have developed a methodology to assess farmland and to appraise its potential value with a high degree of accuracy and efficiency by using information generated through sophisticated technology, including satellite images, rain and temperature records, soil analyses, and topography and drainage maps. Our management team has gained extensive experience in transforming and maximizing the appreciation potential of our land portfolio through the implementation of our agribusiness techniques described above. We also have an extensive track record of rotating our asset portfolio to generate capital gains and monetize the transformation and appreciation generated through our land transformation activities and agricultural operations.
•Experienced management team and knowledgeable employees. Our personnel are our most important asset. We have an experienced senior management team with an average of more than 20 years of experience working in our sector and a solid track record of implementing and executing large-scale growth projects, such as land transformations, greenfield developments of industrial plants, and integrating acquisitions within our organization. Recruiting technically qualified employees at each of our farms and operating sites is a main focus of our senior management and a key to our success.
Our Business Strategy
We intend to maintain our position as a leading agricultural company in South America by expanding and consolidating each of our business lines, creating value for our shareholders. The key elements of our business strategy are as follows:
•Expand our Farming business through organic growth, leasing andstrategic acquisitions. We will continue to seek opportunities for organic growth, target attractive acquisition and leasing opportunities and strive to maximize operating synergies and achieve economies of scale in each of our three main Farming business areas (crops, rice and dairy). We believe that the execution risk associated with these projects will not be significant as we are investing in existing operations that are highly efficient. Moreover, our expected results do not rely exclusively on rising commodity prices, which we expect to remain flat.
•Crops: In February 2019, we acquired a state-of-the-art peanut processing facility strategically located in Córdoba province, Argentina’s largest peanut production area. This plant is equipped with high-performance equipment and comprises a shelling plant, a blanching plant and a seed treatment plant. It has a shelling capacity of 80,000 tons per year, a blanching capacity of 36,000 tons per year, and a storage capacity of 50,000 tons of in-shell peanuts (which will increase to 67,000 by the end of 2022). Moreover, we recently expanded our finished products storage capacity from 7,500 tons to 10,000 tons (4,200 of which are under cold storage). The plant also has a drying capacity of 1,200 tons (at a 14% input moisture). The plant has been granted all necessary certifications and permits, which allow us to satisfy demand in selective global markets that pay a premium for Argentine peanut because of its superior quality. Our increased focus in the segment will allow us to reduce costs by (i) saving in tolling and brokerage fees, (ii) consolidating and exporting our production from our on-site customs, (iii) reducing operational risks and (iv) having access to land at competitive prices by managing crop rotation ourselves, among others.
•Rice: We completed investments in the segment that have enabled us to increase productivity at the farm level, improve our rice processing and distribution capabilities, and increase the value of main by-products. Some of our investments in this segment include: (i) the implementation of zero-level technology in over 30,000 hectares, which has considerably reduced water consumption at the farm, and increased yields by providing better germination, uniform irrigation and lower losses during harvest; (ii) the increased use of our own machinery for planting and harvesting activities, which has allowed us to seek optimal harvest timing; and (iii) the installation of an on-site dryer at our Oscuro farm, which added efficiency to our grain storage and handling and reduced transportation and other costs. At the industrial level, we constructed a parboil plant that has allowed us to increase our processing volume and produce a higher-margin product.
•Dairy: As of December 2021, we had four fully operative free-stall facilities with an occupancy of 13,742 cows. We continue with our strategy of growing and securing corn silage to feed additional cows. As for the biodigester, energy production is stabilized and generating attractive results.
Additionally, since February 2019 we are owners of two milk processing facilities acquired from SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitadas. Both plants are well equipped and strategically located. The facility located in the city of Morteros, Province of Córdoba, is at the center of Argentina’s largest dairy basin and has a processing capacity of 840 thousand liters per day aimed at producing powdered milk and cheese, mainly destined to the export market. The facility located in Chivilcoy, in the province of Buenos Aires, is halfway between our dairy free-stall facilities and the city of Buenos Aires, the largest fluid dairy market. The processing capacity of this facility is 555.000 liters per day aimed at producing mostly fluid milk. These acquisitions are part of our long term growth strategy, consistent with our strategy for our crops, rice, sugar, ethanol, and energy businesses. We believe that being vertically integrated allows us to control the supply chain, which in turn enhances efficiencies and increases margins, and provides us with the flexibility to sell into the export and domestic markets, based on relative profitability with a view to generate attractive returns.
• Consolidate our sugar and ethanol cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul. Our main strategy for our sugar and ethanol business is to consolidate our cluster in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul in Brazil by ramping up production at our Ivinhema and Angelica mills, which have a nominal capacity of 13 million tons per year. See “ —Operations and Principal Activities—Sugar, Ethanol and Energy—Our Mills.” The consolidation of the cluster has generated important synergies, operating efficiencies and economies of scale such as (i) a reduction in the average distance from sugarcane fields to mills, generating important savings in sugarcane transportation expenses; (ii) a single centralized management team, reducing total administration cost per ton of sugarcane milled; and (iii) a large sugarcane plantation supplying two mills, which permits non-stop harvesting. Our sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul has allowed us to become one of the most efficient and low cost producers of sugar, ethanol and energy in Brazil. Additionally, we plan to continue to monitor closely the Brazilian sugar and ethanol industries and may pursue selective acquisitions that provide opportunities to increase our economies of scale, operating synergies and profitability.
We remain focused on finding ways to continue maximizing efficiency and generating additional synergies and cost dilution. In this process, our operating teams identified certain bottlenecks in our industrial operations that were removed with minimal investments and allowed us to increase crushing volumes per hour and total capacity per year. In 2021, we inaugurated a molecular sieve at our Ivinhema mill, which increased our ethanol dehydration capacity by 50%. Prior to this investment, the only mill capable of producing anhydrous ethanol was the Angelica mill. This increase in our dehydration capacity is as a commercial tool that enhances the efficiency and sustainability of our operations and increases our production flexibility. Combined with our high ethanol storage capacity, it enables us to carry over stocks and places us in a solid position to benefit from higher expected prices.
• Further increase our operating efficiencies while maintaining a diversified portfolio. We intend to continue to focus on improving the efficiency of our operations and maintaining a low-cost structure to increase our profitability and protect our cash flows from commodity price cycle risk. We seek to maintain our low-cost platform by (i) making additional investments in advanced technologies, including those related to agricultural, industrial and logistical processes and information technology, (ii) improving our economies of scale through organic growth, strategic acquisitions, and more efficient production methods, and (iii) fully utilizing our resources to increase our production margins. In addition, we intend to mitigate commodity price cycle risk and minimize our exposure to weather related losses by (a) maintaining a diversified product mix and vertically integrating production of certain commodities and (b) geographically diversifying the locations of our farms.
• Continue to implement our land transformation strategy. We plan to continue to enhance the value of our owned farmland and future land acquisitions by making them suitable for more profitable agricultural activities, thereby seeking to maximize the return on our invested capital in our land assets. In addition, we expect to continue rotating our land
portfolio through strategic dispositions of certain properties in order to realize and monetize the transformation and appreciation value created by our land transformation activities. We also plan to leverage our knowledge and experience in land asset- management to identify superior buying and selling opportunities.
Operations and Principal Activities
Farming Business
Our Farming business is divided into three main reportable operating businesses: Crops, Rice and Dairy. We conduct our Farming operations on our own land and on land leased from third parties. During the 2020/2021 harvest year, our Farming operations were conducted on 262,110 hectares of land; of this land, 111,009 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) were owned by us, 41,924 hectares were second harvest areas, and 109,178 hectares were leased. During the 2019/2020 harvest year, our Farming operations were conducted on 237,806 hectares of land; of this land, 105,883 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) were owned by us, 34,556 were second harvest areas, and 97,367 hectares were leased. During the 2018/2019 harvest year, we conducted our Farming operations on 225,115 hectares of land; of this, 107,681 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) were owned by us, 31,127 were second harvest areas, and 86,307 hectares were leased.
The following table sets forth our production volumes for each of our farming business lines.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Harvest Year |
| | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| Production | | (in tons) |
| Crops (tons) (1) | | 733,334 | | | 720,059 | | | 652,169 | |
| Rice (tons) (2) | | 346,685 | | | 278,348 | | | 239,779 | |
| Total | | 1,080,019 | | | 998,407 | | | 891,948 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Dairy (thousands of liters)(3) | | 173,148 | | | 145,192 | | | 120,069 | |
(1) Crop production does not include 300,782 tons, 226,821 tons, and 212,650 tons of forage produced in the 2020/2021, 2019/2020 and 2018/2019 harvest years, respectively. It also does not include the soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
(2) Expressed in tons of rough rice.
(3) Raw milk produced.
Crops Business (Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton)
Our agricultural production is mainly based on planting, growing and harvesting crops over our owned arable area. During the 2020/2021 harvest year, we planted crops on approximately 223,165 hectares, including our owned land, leased land and second harvest areas. In mid-2021, we began planting crops pertaining for the 2021/2022 harvest year, which was concluded in the first quarter of 2022, with a total planted area of 244,033 hectares (including forage). Our main products include soybean, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower and cotton. Other products, such as sorghum and barley, are sown occasionally and represent only a small percentage of total sown land.
Our crop production process is directly linked to the geo-climatic conditions of our farms and our crop cycles, which define the periods for planting and harvesting our various products. Our crop diversification and the location of our farms in various regions of South America enable us to implement an efficient planting and harvesting system throughout the year, which includes second harvests in many cases. Our production process begins with the planting of each crop. After harvesting, crops may go through a processing phase where the grains or seeds are cleaned and dried to reach the required market standards. For additional discussion on our harvest years and the presentation of production and product area information in this annual report, see "Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Fiscal Year and Harvest Year."
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the planted areas for our main products:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| Planted Area | | (in hectares) |
| Soybean (1) | | 68,315 | | | 73,685 | | | 73,309 | |
| Corn (2) | | 56,568 | | | 61,112 | | | 46,787 | |
| Wheat (3) | | 44,392 | | | 32,799 | | | 40,210 | |
| Sunflower | | 16,164 | | | 6,818 | | | 3,825 | |
| Cotton | | 3,519 | | | 4,461 | | | 5,316 | |
| Peanut | | 26,123 | | | 16,814 | | | 15,479 | |
| Others (4) | | 2,747 | | | 574 | | | 881 | |
| Forage (5) | | 5,337 | | | 6,758 | | | 5,828 | |
| Total | | 223,165 | | | 203,020 | | | 191,635 | |
(1) Includes soybean first crop and second crop planted area.
(2) Includes sorghum.
(3) Includes barley crop.
(4) Includes beans, chia and sesame.
(5) Forage includes corn silage, wheat silage and sorghum used for feeding cattle in our dairy operation.
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the production volumes for our main products:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| | | 2021/2022 | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
Production(1) | | (in tons) |
| Soybeans (2) (3) | | 1,510 | | | 172,969 | | | 181,259 | | | 187,226 | |
| Corn (2) | | 33,726 | | | 327,164 | | | 364,176 | | | 295,990 | |
| Wheat | | 137,749 | | | 122,749 | | | 104,236 | | | 114,809 | |
| Sunflower (2) | | 32,882 | | | 28,436 | | | 12,652 | | | 5,937 | |
| Cotton lint (2) | | 28 | | | 1,772 | | | 1,490 | | | 422 | |
| Peanut (2) | | — | | | 77,891 | | | 55,630 | | | 47,785 | |
| Others | | 120 | | | 2,353 | | | 616 | | | — | |
| Total (2) | | 206,015 | | | 733,334 | | | 720,059 | | | 652,169 | |
(1) Crop production does not include 300,782 tons, 226,821 tons and 212,650 tons of forage produced in the 2020/2021, 2019/2020 and 2018/2019 harvest years, respectively.
(2) As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of soybean, corn, peanut, sunflower and cotton pertaining to the 2021/2022 harvest year is ongoing. The only crop that has been fully harvested is wheat.
(3) Does not include the soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
The following table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the sales volume for our main products:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Sales | | (In thousands of US$) |
| Soybeans (5) | | 56,997 | | | 44,732 | | | 46,386 | |
| Corn (1) | | 57,504 | | | 45,088 | | | 61,332 | |
Wheat (2) | | 27,267 | | | 15,109 | | | 20,318 | |
| Sunflower | | 16,618 | | | 10,925 | | | 8,430 | |
| Peanut | | 60,422 | | | 46,983 | | | 28,994 | |
| Other crops (3) | | 10,086 | | | 7,277 | | | 3,478 | |
| Adjustments (4) | | 11,836 | | | (1,653) | | | (2,492) | |
| Total | | 240,730 | | | 168,461 | | | 166,446 | |
(1) Includes sorghum.
(2) Includes barley.
(3) Includes cotton, other crops and farming services.
(4) Refers to the accumulated adjustment of hyperinflation in the accounting translation for our Crops segment sales.
(5) Does not include revenue corresponding to the sale of soybean planted in Brazil in 2020/2021 as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment.
Soybeans
Soybeans are an annual legume widely grown due to their high content of protein (40%) and oil (20%). They have been grown for over 3,000 years in Asia and, more recently, have been successfully cultivated around the world. The world’s top producers of soybeans currently are the United States, Brazil, Argentina, China and India. Soybeans are one of the few plants that provide a complete protein supply as they contain all eight essential amino acids. About 85% of the world’s soybeans are processed, or “crushed,” annually into soybean meal and oil. Approximately 98% of soybean meal is further processed into animal feed, with the balance used to make soy flour and proteins. Of the oil content, 85% is consumed as edible oil and the rest is used for industrial products such as fatty acids, soaps and biodiesel. We sell our soybeans mainly to crushing and processing industries, which produce soybean oil and soybean meal used in the food, animal feed and biofuel industries.
Soybeans comprised, 5.2%, 5.5%, and 5.1% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively.
Corn
Corn is a cereal grown around the world and is one of the world’s most widely consumed foods. The main component of corn grain is starch (72% to 73% of grain weight), followed by proteins (8% to 11%). Corn grain is directly used for food and animal feed (beef, swine and poultry meat production and dairy). Corn is also processed to make food and feed ingredients (such as high fructose corn syrup, corn starch and lysine), or industrial products such as ethanol and polylactic acid (PLA). Oil, flour and sugar are also extracted from corn, with several uses in the food, medicine and cosmetic industries. Additionally, there are specific corn types used for direct human consumption such as popcorn and sweet corn.
Corn comprised 6.9% of our consolidated sales in 2019, 5.5% of our consolidated sales in 2020, and 5.1% of our consolidated sales in 2021.
Wheat
Wheat is the world’s largest cereal-grass crop. Unlike other cereals, wheat grain contains a high amount of gluten, the protein that provides the elasticity necessary for excellent bread making. Although most wheat is grown for human consumption, other industries use small quantities to produce starch, paste, malt, dextrose, gluten, alcohol, and other products. Inferior and surplus wheat and various milling by products are used for livestock feed. We sell wheat to exporters and to local mills that produce flour for the food industry.
Wheat comprised 2.3% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 1.8% of our total consolidated sales in 2020, and 2.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2021.
Sunflower
There are two types of sunflower, the most important in terms of volume being the oilseed sunflower, which is primarily grown for the oil extracted from the seed. Sunflower oil is considered one of the top three oils for human consumption, due to its high oil content (39-49%) and its oil composition (90% of oleic and linoleic oil). The other type of sunflower is the confectionary sunflower, which is used for direct human consumption. Sunflower seeds are an exceptional source of vitamin E, omega-6 fatty acids, dietary fiber and minerals. We grow both types of sunflower.
Sunflower comprised 1.0% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 1.3% in 2020, and 1.5% in 2021.
Since early 2019, we operate a sunflower processing facility located in Buenos Aires province, Argentina. This enables us to control processing activities and develop direct and long term relationships with different customers around the world.
Peanut
Peanut is a summer legume that has its harvesting process divided in two stages: (1) digging, which implies loosening the plant, cutting the taproot and inverting the plant; and (2) combining which means separating the pods from the vines. Planting activities begin in October and approximately 150 days after planting, digging activities take place. In Argentina, all peanuts grown are high oleic. Córdoba province is Argentina's largest peanut production area due to its optimal agro-climatic conditions, which have led many processing industries to install there.
Argentina is positioned among the most important players in the production and export of peanuts, with high technological levels both in terms of production as well as processing. Argentina exports more than 90% of the peanuts it produces and its main market is the E.U., followed by Russia and Latin America. Its main competitors are the United States, Brazil and China. We grow peanuts in the center region of Argentina.
Peanut comprised 3.3% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 5.7% of our total consolidated sales in 2020 and 5.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2021.
Since early 2019, we own and operate a peanut processing facility equipped with cutting-edge technology. This vertical integration is in line with our strategy to grow our peanut business as it enables us to control processing activities and develop direct and long term relations with different customers around the world.
Forages
We are engaged in the production of forage in Argentina, including corn silage, wheat silage and sorghum silage. We use forage as cow feed in our dairy operation. During the 2020/2021 harvest year, we planted 5,337 hectares of forage and produced 300,782 tons of forage.
Rice Business
Rice is the main food staple for about half of the world’s population. Although it is cultivated in over 100 countries and on almost every continent, 90% of the world’s rice is grown and consumed in Asia. Globally, rice is the most important crop in terms of its contribution to human diets and production value. There are three main types of rice: short grain, medium grain and long grain rice. Each one has a different taste and texture. We produce long grain rice and Carolina double rice, a variety of medium grain rice.
We conduct our rice operation in the northeast of Argentina, which is one of the most efficient locations in the world for producing rice at a low cost. This is a result of optimum natural agronomic conditions, including plentiful sunlight, abundant availability of water for low cost irrigation and large quantities of land. The use of public water for artificial irrigation is governed by provincial regulations and is subject to the granting of governmental permits. We currently have permits for the use of water in our production of rice in the provinces of Corrientes and Santa Fe. Maintenance of our permits is subject to our compliance with applicable laws and regulations, which is supervised by the corresponding governmental authority (e.g., the Ministry of Water, Public Services and Environment (Ministerio de Agua, Servicios Publicos y Medio Ambiente), in the province of Santa Fe, and the Water Institute of the Province of Corrientes (Instituto Correntino del Agua).
The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the total number of planted rice hectares we owned and leased as well as the overall rough rice we produced:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Harvest Year |
| Rice Product Area and Production | | 2021/2022 | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 |
| Owned planted area (hectares) | | 43,009 | | | 40,444 | | | 39,162 | | | 37,608 | |
| Leased planted area (hectares) | | 6,031 | | | 3,839 | | | 2,382 | | | 1,700 | |
| Total rice planted (hectares) | | 49,040 | | | 44,282 | | | 41,544 | | | 39,308 | |
Rough rice production (tons) (1) | | 215,252 | | | 346,685 | | | 278,348 | | | 239,779 | |
(1) As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of rice pertaining to the 2021/2022 harvest year is ongoing.
We grow rice on four farms owned by us and four farms leased by us, all located in Argentina. In the 2018/2019 harvest year, we planted approximately 39,308 hectares and produced a total of 239,779 tons of rice, which represented 17% of our total planted area and 27% of our total farming production. In the 2019/2020 harvest year, we planted approximately 41,544 hectares and produced 278,348 tons of rice, which represented 17% of our total planted area and 28% of our total farming
production. In the 2020/2021 harvest year, we planted approximately 44,282 hectares and produced 346,685 tons of rice, which represented 17% of our total planted area and 32% of our total farming production. In the ongoing 2021/2022 harvest year, we planted approximately 49,040 hectares of rice, which have not been fully harvested as of the date of this annual report.
Rice comprised 11.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 12.5% in 2020 and 12.0% in 2021.
Rice Production Process
The rice production cycle lasts approximately five to six months, beginning in September of each year and ending in April of the following year. Rice planting continues until November, followed by treatment of the rice, which lasts approximately three months, until January. Our harvest begins in February and lasts until April. After harvesting, the rice is ready for processing.
We process rice in our three rice mills in Argentina, where we are able to process our entire rice crop and utilize our excess milling capacity to process rough rice we purchase from third party growers.
At the mill, we clean the rice to remove all impurities. We then put it through a dryer to remove excess moisture from the grains. Proper drying results in increased storage life, prevents deterioration in quality and leads to optimum milling. Once dried, the rice grain, now known as rough rice or paddy rice, is ready for storage. We store rice in elevators or in silo bags until milling. During the milling process, the rough rice goes through a dehusking machine that removes the husk from the kernel. The rice that is obtained after this process is known as brown rice and is ready for human consumption. Brown rice becomes white rice after it is polished to remove the excess bran.
The main objective of the milling process is to remove the husk and the bran, preserving the quality of the whole grain. Although the process is highly automated and uses advanced technology, some rice grains are broken in the process. The percentage of broken rice depends on a number of factors such as the crop development cycle at the farm, the variety of the grain, the handling and the industrial process. Average processing of rough rice results in 58.5% white rice, 13.0% broken rice, 20.0% rice husk and 8.5% bran rice, which is sold for use as cattle feed or floor bedding in the poultry business.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Processed Rice Production | | (in tons) |
| Rough rice processed — own | | 306,602 | | | 263,637 | | | 250,427 | |
| Rough rice processed — third party | | 12,130 | | | 26,393 | | | 24,920 | |
| Total rough rice processed | | 318,732 | | | 290,030 | | | 275,347 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Processed Rice Sales | | (in thousands of $) |
| Total Sales | | 134,869 | | | 101,862 | | | 101,156 | |
Rice comprised 11.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 12.5% in 2020 and 12.0% in 2021.
Rice Seed Production
In our rice seed facility in Argentina, we are involved in the genetic development of new rice varieties adapted to local conditions to increase rice productivity and quality to improve both farm production as well as the manufacturing process. In connection with these efforts, we have entered into agreements with selected research and development institutions such as the National Institute of Agriculture Technology (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, or “INTA”) in Argentina, the Instituto Riograndense do Arroz or “IRGA” in Brazil, the Híbridos de Arroz para América Latina or “HIAA” in Colombia, the Latin American Fund for Irrigated Rice (Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego, or “FLAR”) in Colombia, the Santa Catarina State Agricultural Research and Rural Extension Agency (Empresa de pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina, or “EPAGRI”) in Brazil and Badische Anilin- und Soda-Fabrik (“BASF”) in Germany. Our own technical team is continuously testing and developing new rice varieties. Our first rice seed variety, Ita Caabo 105, was released to the market in 2008. In 2011 we released our second variety Ita Caabo 110, and at the beginning of 2014 we released our third variety, Ita Caabo 107. We are currently experimenting with a wide range of varieties to continue improving our productivity in addition to the development of a hybrid line. These seeds are both used at our farms and sold to rice farmers in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay
and Paraguay. We are also developing, alongside BASF, a herbicide-tolerant rice variety to assist in the control of harmful weeds.
Dairy Business
We conduct our dairy operation in our farms located in the Argentine humid pampas region. This region is one of the best places in the world for producing raw milk at a low cost, due to the availability of grains and forages produced efficiently and at low cost, and due to the favorable weather for cow comfort and productivity. Our dairy operation consists of four free-stall dairy facilities with an occupancy of 13,742 milking cows as of December 2021, and a total capacity of 14,400.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated below, the total number of our dairy cows, average daily milk production per cow and our total milk production:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Dairy Herd & Production | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Total dairy herd (head) (1) | | 13,742 | | | 11,477 | | | 9,781 | |
Average milking cows (2) | | 12,942 | | | 10,876 | | | 9,066 | |
Average daily production (liters per cow) (2) | | 36.7 | | | 36.5 | | | 36.3 | |
| Total production (thousands of liters) | | 173,148 | | | 145,192 | | | 120,069 | |
(1) As of December.
(2) Annual average.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31 |
| Dairy Sales | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | (In thousands of $) |
| Sales | | 183,054 | | | 133,474 | | | 83,822 | |
Dairy comprised 9.4% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 16.3% for 2020 and 16.3% for 2021 respectively.
Our four free-stall dairy facilities are fully ramped up and are delivering high productivity levels. In 2020, we began the construction of our fourth free-stall facility, which was finalized in February 2021 and will allow us to reach a capacity of over 14,000 total milking cows. We believe this investment is a unique opportunity to leverage Argentina’s competitive advantages in transforming vegetable protein into milk protein, our operational expertise, and the positive outlook for global and local milk prices.
We own two milk processing facilities acquired from SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitadas in February 2019, in addition to the Las Tres Niñas and Angelita trademarks, both of which are well-known in Argentina and represent a solid sales vehicle for retail and consumer dairy products. Our milk facilities produce UHT and UP milk, powdered milk and semi-hard cheese, among others. Our facilities have a total installed reception capacity of 2.4 million liters per day and an installed processing capacity of 1.4 million liters of raw milk per day. To account for the difference between total installed capacity and actual utilization, we must account for the efficiency rate of our machines, maintenance works, number of working days and number of personnel shifts, among other variables. In 2021, we processed 352.5 million liters of raw milk.
Our Chivilcoy industrial facility is located in the city of Chivilcoy, in the province of Buenos Aires, and is primarily focused on fluid milk production for the domestic market. It has an installed processing capacity of 555,000 liters per day and an installed milk reception capacity of 1.2 million liters per day. The facility has an installed processing capacity of 510,000 liters of UHT milk and 45,000 liters of yogurt, cream and cocoa flavored milk. In 2021, we processed 112.4 million liters of raw milk in the Chivilcoy facility.
Our Morteros industrial facility is located in the city of Morteros, in the province of Córdoba, and produces powdered milk and semi-hard cheese primarily for the export market. Morteros plant has an installed processing capacity of 840,000 liters per day (550,000 liters for milk powdered and 290,000 liters for cheese), and it has an installed milk reception capacity of 1.2 million liters per day. In 2021, we processed 235.7 million liters of raw milk in the Morteros facility.
Dairy Production Process
We wean calves during the 24 hours subsequent to birth and during the next 60 days raise them on pasteurized milk and high protein meal. Male calves are fed concentrates and hay for an additional three months in the farm before they are sent to
our feedlot or to third party feedlots to be fattened for sale. Young heifers remain in open corrals during the next 13 months where they are fed with concentrates and forage until they are ready for breeding. Calving occurs nine months later. Heifers are subsequently milked for an average of 320 days. Dairy cows are once again inseminated during the 42 to 90-day period following calving. This process is repeated once a year for a period of three or four years. The pregnancy rate for our herd is between 85% and 90% per year.
Each cow in our dairy herd is mechanically milked three times a day. The milk obtained is cooled to less than four degrees centigrade in order to preserve its quality and is then stored in a tank, or directly loaded to trucks which derives in increased quality and lower costs. Milk is delivered mainly to our processing facilities and the balance is sold to large third party milk processing facilities on a daily basis by tank trucks. We feed our dairy cows mainly with corn and alfalfa silages, some grass and corn grain, supplemented as needed with soybean by-products, hay, vitamins and minerals.
We have invested in technology to improve the genetics of our cows, animal health and feeding in order to enhance our milk production. These investments include top quality imported semen from genetically improved North American Holstein bulls, agricultural machinery and devices, use of dietary supplements and modern equipment to control individual milk production and cooling. Our feeding program is focused on high conversion of feed into milk, while maintaining cows in good health and comfort. We have also invested in technology and know-how so as to increase our forage production and utilization.
Implementation of the free-stall system allows us to position ourselves as a key player in the dairy industry and boost our agricultural and industrial integration presence in the South American agricultural sector. By eliminating cow grazing, we reduced the amount of land utilized for milk production, which freed up more land for our agricultural and land development activities. Cow productivity (measured in liters of milk produced per day) using the free-stall system increases by up to 40% compared to traditional grazing systems. These productivity gains are because the free-stall system significantly improves the conversion rate of animal feed to milk, resulting in an approximate 40% increase in the conversion ratio, or the production of 1.4 liters of milk for each 1 kg of animal feed as compared to the average of 1 liter of milk for each 1 kg of feed associated with the usual grazing model.
This increased productivity and conversion rate are primarily due to improved cow comfort and an enhanced diet quality. We assess cow comfort through the engagement of expert consultants, who recommended designing beds covered with sand. The sand plays a significant role in helping cows to rest comfortably. Additionally, we installed a cooling system to increase cow comfort as well. This system relies on water sprinklers and ventilation fans located all over the facility to create a controlled, cool atmosphere, which improves cow comfort as the Holstein herd is originally adapted to cold regions. Additionally, we manage diet quality by adapting our feeding regime based on the various feeding stages in the lifetime of each cow. The actual feeding is fully mechanized, and we carefully control the harvesting and storage of feed. The control of all productivity variables, such as reproduction, health and operations, supports efficiency gains through standardized processes. Finally, the physical concentration of the animals facilitates efficient overall management of the Dairy business as a whole. In terms of the environment, the free-stall model allows for a better effluent treatment, which includes a sand-manure separator stage, a decantation pool and an anaerobic lagoon. All these processes help to decrease the organic matter content of the effluent and deliver a cleaner output. The final treated effluent is used to fertigate crops adjacent to the dairy operation. Accordingly, we transform dairy waste into a high value-added by-product, which reduces fertilizer usage.
During October 2017, we completed the construction of our first biodigester. This facility enhances the sustainability of our free-stall dairy operation by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving the effluent management and concentrating valuable nutrients which are applied back to the fields. It generates electricity by burning biogas extracted from the effluents produced by our milking cows. On November 3, 2017, we began generating and delivering 1.4 MW of electricity to the local power grid. In addition to enhancing in the sustainability of our diary operation, it increases revenues and secures our energy requirements.
All Other Segments
All Other Segments primarily encompass our cattle business. Our cattle segment consists of pasture land that is not suitable for crop production due to soil quality and is leased to third parties for cattle grazing activities.
We currently own 55,509 hectares of cattle grazing land located in the Argentine provinces of Corrientes, Santa Fe, Formosa and Santiago del Estero. In 2021, we entered into new lease agreements with third-party cattle farmers for a total area of 14,935 hectares.
Storage and Conditioning for the Farming Business
Our storage and conditioning facilities in the Farming business allow us to condition, store and deliver our products with no third-party involvement. All our crop storage facilities are located close to our farms, allowing us to (i) reduce storage and conditioning costs; (ii) reduce freight costs since we only commence moving the product once the final destination is determined, whether locally or to a port; (iii) capitalize on fluctuations in the prices of commodities; and (iv) improve commercial performance by mixing grains to avoid discounts due to substandard quality.
We own two conditioning and storage facilities for grains and oilseeds, with a total built storage capacity of 37,000 tons. One of our facilities has a capacity of 12,500 tons and is located in the province of Santa Fe, Argentina, in the town of Christophersen. It has a railway loading terminal, providing logistical flexibility and savings. Our other facility is located in Buenos Aires province close to Bahía Blanca’s deep water port, in an area where we produce 120,000 tons of grains. In addition, our peanut processing facility has the capacity to store 10,000 tons of finished product (and 50,000 of in-shell product), while our sunflower processing facility has the capacity to store 4,000 tons of sunflower. We also own in Argentina three rice mills, which account for over 126,500 tons of total storage capacity, and one additional conditioning facility for rice handling, with a total storage capacity of 6,300 tons.
The table below sets forth our storage capacity as of December 31, 2021:
| | | | | | | | |
| Storage Capacity | | Nominal |
| Crops (tons) (1) | | 51,000 |
| Rice (tons) | | 132,800 |
| Dairy (liters) (2) | | 25,800,000 |
(1) Includes 37,000 tons corresponding to our two conditioning and storage facilities, 10,000 tons to our peanut facility and 4,000 tons to our sunflower facility.
(2) The Morteros facility accounts for 24.3 million liters of fluid milk (equivalent to 2,500 tons of milk powder and 360 tons of cheese) while the Chivilcoy accounts for 1.5 million liters of fluid milk.
In addition, we use silo bags to increase our storage capacity at a low cost. Silo bags are an efficient low-cost method for grain storage. As crops are harvested, they are placed inside large polyethylene bags that can be left in the fields for approximately 12 months without damaging the grain. Each silo bag can hold up to 180 to 200 tons of product, depending on the type of grain. During the 2020/2021 harvest year, we stored approximately 50% of our grain production through silo bags.
Silo bags offer important operational and logistic advantages, such as (i) low cost storage; (ii) flexible and scalable capacity that is adapted based on production and commercial strategy; (iii) harvest efficiencies since the bags are filled on the field allowing for a non-stop harvest operation regardless of any logistical setbacks; (iv) logistic efficiencies leading to lower freight since grains are transported during the off-season when truck fares are lower; (v) increased ability to monitor quality and identify different grain qualities, since grains are stored in relatively small amounts (200 tons) and easily monitored, maximizing our commercial performance; and (vi) better use of our drying capacity throughout the year. Silo bags are commercially accepted. Grains stored in silo bags can be sold in the market, and if such grains are to be delivered post-harvest, we charge storage costs. Additionally, we can store grains to be used as seed during the following season (soybeans, rice and wheat), achieving quality seed management. We have expanded the use of silo bags from Argentina to our operations in Brazil and Uruguay.
Grain conditioning facilities at our farms allow our trade desk to optimize commercialization costs and to achieve commercial quality standards and avoid price discounts. These facilities are operated to dry, clean, mix and separate different qualities of each grain in order to achieve commercial standards. By mixing different batches of a same grain type, differentiated by quality parameters such as moisture, percentage broken, and percentage damaged, among others, we can achieve commercial standards without having to discount a lower-quality stand-alone batch. Efficient management of these facilities results in a lower cost for grain conditioning and a better achievable price.
The table below sets forth our drying capacity as of December 31, 2021:
| | | | | | | | |
| Drying Capacity | | Nominal |
| Crops (tons/day) (1) | | 9,925 |
| Rice (tons/day) | | 6,850 |
(1) Includes the drying capacity corresponding to our two grain conditioning and storage facilities, our peanut processing facility and our sunflower processing facility.
Some grains such as soybeans, wheat and rice, can be used for seed during the next planting season. We produce almost 97% of the seed used for planting these crops in our fields. The seed is stored in silo bags and/or grain facilities, where it can be processed, classified, and prepared for planting during next crop season. A deep survey and monitoring process is carried out in order to evaluate, control and deliver high quality seed to our farms.
The rest of our seed requirements are purchased from seed suppliers in order to incorporate new enhanced varieties into our planting plan.
Marketing, Sales and Distribution for the Farming Business
Crops
In Argentina, grain prices are based on the market prices quoted on Argentine grain exchanges, such as the Bolsa de Cereales de Buenos Aires and the Bolsa de Cereales de Rosario, which use as a reference the prevailing prices in international grain exchanges (including CBOT and ICE-NY). In Uruguay, local prices are based on an export parity (during harvest) or import parity in the case of post-harvest sales, which, in each case, takes into account the prices and costs associated with each market. In Brazil, the grain market includes the Bolsa de Mercadorias e Futuros (the Brazilian Grain Exchange), which, as in Argentina, uses as a price reference the international grain exchanges (including CBOT and ICE-NY). Prices are quoted in relation to the month of delivery and the port in which the product is to be delivered. Different conditions in price, such as terms of storage and shipment, are negotiated between us and the end buyer. We negotiate sales with the top traders and industrial companies in our markets. We also engage in hedging positions by buying and selling futures and options in commodities exchanges, including the Chicago Board of Trade, the New York Board of Trade, the B3, and the Mercado aTérmino de Buenos Aires (MATBA).
Soybeans
Our soybean crop is sold to local companies and is ultimately exported or diverted to the crushing industry. Approximately 63% of the soybean crop was hedged pre-harvest, by forward sales and sales in the futures markets. Harvest and post-harvest sales are a function of the export market versus local premiums paid by crushers (oil, meal and biodiesel) and logistics considerations. Our five largest customers accounted for approximately 82% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Corn
Our production is mainly destined to the export market. Our five largest customers comprised approximately 79% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Wheat
Our wheat production is mainly destined to export industry. Quality segregation allows us to negotiate premiums with the millers and export market. Brazil is the main importer of Argentine wheat. Our five largest customers comprised approximately 79% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Sunflower
Our sunflower production from Argentina is sold to local companies. Our four largest customers comprised 95% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Peanut
Approximately 95% of our peanut production is exported. Our 10 largest customers comprised approximately 65% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021, while the European Union was the destination for over 85% of our sales.
Cotton
We typically make pre-harvest sales of cotton fiber produced in Argentina into the export market. Sales for the textile industry are based on domestic demand and premiums. Our two largest customers comprised approximately 100% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021. Cotton seed is sold in the domestic market to meet feed demand.
Customers
We sell manufactured and agricultural products to a large base of customers. The type and class of customers may differ depending on our business segments, regions and some logistics issues that are very important in our decision making. In
the year ended December 31, 2021, more than 90% of our sales of crops were sold to 10 well-known customers, both international and local. Of these customers, the first five cases represented almost 70% of our sales and the remaining five customers represented approximately 20% of our net sales in 2021.
Rice
Rough rice is available for sale commencing after the harvest of each year. White rice availability is based on our milling capacity. 83% of our total rice production is sold into the export market, with the remainder sold in Argentina in the retail market. We export approximately 34% of our exported volume to the European Union, 25% to Cuba, 14% to Mexico; and the balance to the Middle East, Brazil, Chile and other Central American countries. We sell approximately 17% of our rice in the Argentine retail market through three brands, which collectively have a 15.8% market share. Local rice prices are driven by regional supply demand and other world export prices. Our six largest customers for rice in the retail market accounted for approximately 53% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Dairy
In 2021, 73% of our raw milk production was destined to our processing facilities, while the majority of the balance was sold to a single dairy producer. We negotiate the price of raw milk on a monthly basis in accordance with domestic supply and demand. The price of the milk we sell is mainly based on the percentage of fat and protein that it contains and the temperature at which it is cooled. The price of milk also rises or falls based on the content of bacteria and somatic cells. We are one of the top 10 dairy processors in Argentina, considering our free-stall production of over 500,000 liters per day and the raw milk we source from 140 farmers (123 in Morteros and 17 in Chivilcoy).
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business
The following table sets forth a breakdown of our production volumes by product for the years indicated in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Sugar (tons) (1) | | 546,819 | | | 646,981 | | | 213,256 | |
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 534,603 | | | 502,170 | | | 756,494 | |
| Energy (MWh exported) | | 730,739 | | | 717,915 | | | 853,139 | |
(1) Includes 4,145 tons of organic sugar in 2021, 8,659 tons in 2020 and 1,783 tons in 2019.
The following table sets forth our sales for each of the sugarcane by-products we produce for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | (In thousands of $) |
| Sugar | | 208,365 | | | 171,102 | | | 97,710 | |
| Ethanol | | 291,883 | | | 199,062 | | | 373,847 | |
| Energy | | 48,017 | | | 41,169 | | | 59,701 | |
| Other | | 13,745 | | | 126 | | | 525 | |
| Total | | 562,010 | | | 411,459 | | | 531,783 | |
Sugarcane
Sugarcane is a tropical grass that grows best in locations with stable, warm temperatures and high humidity, although cold and dry winters are an important factor for the sucrose concentration of sugarcane. The climate and topography of the center-south region of Brazil is ideal for the cultivation of sugarcane and accounts for approximately 85% of Brazil's sugarcane production. Sugarcane is the most efficient agricultural raw material used in the production of sugar and ethanol. Ethanol produced from sugarcane is highly regarded as an environmentally friendly biofuel with the following characteristics.
Renewable: Sugarcane ethanol, unlike coal or oil, which can be depleted, is produced from sugarcane plants that grow back year after year, provided that they are replanted every five to seven years.
Sustainable: Sugarcane only needs to be replanted every five to seven years, as a semi-perennial crop. It can be harvested without uprooting the plant, and therefore its cultivation has less of an impact on the soil and the surrounding environment. The mechanization of the harvesting and planting process further improves sustainable agricultural management.
Energy Efficient: Sugarcane is highly efficient in converting sunlight, water and carbon dioxide into stored energy. The energy output of sugarcane is equal to nine times the energy input used in the production process, whereas the energy output of corn ethanol is only about 1.9 to 2.3 times the energy input used in its production process. Sugarcane produces seven times more energy compared to corn used for ethanol production.
Low Carbon Emissions: Compared to gasoline, sugarcane ethanol reduces greenhouse gases by more than 61%, which is the greatest reduction of any other liquid biofuel produced today in large quantities. Ethanol made from sugarcane is deemed an advanced biofuel by the United States EPA.
Synergies: The main raw material used in the production of electricity in sugar mills is bagasse, which is a by-product of the sugarcane milling process, allowing for a renewable source of co-generated electricity.
Sugarcane is a tropical grass that grows best in locations with stable, warm temperatures and high humidity, although cold and dry winters are an important factor for the sucrose concentration of sugarcane. The climate and topography of the center-south region of Brazil is ideal for the cultivation of sugarcane and accounts for approximately 85% of Brazil’s sugarcane production.
As of December 31, 2021, our sugarcane plantations consisted of 185,806 hectares of sugarcane planted in Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso do Sul in Brazil. Approximately 96% of our sugarcane is planted over land leased through agricultural partnerships. Under these agreements, our partners lease land to us for periods of between one and two sugarcane cycles, equivalent to periods of between seven to 14 years, on which we cultivate the sugarcane. Lease payments are based on the market value of the sugarcane set forth by the regulations of the State of São Paulo Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Growers Council (Conselho dos Produtores deCana-de-Açúcar, Açúcar e Álcool do Estado de São Paulo) or “Consecana”. We planted and harvested approximately 96% of the total sugarcane we milled during 2021, with the remaining 4% purchased directly from third parties at prices also determined by the Consecana system, based on the sucrose content of the cane and the prices of sugar and ethanol. The following table sets forth a breakdown during the time periods indicated of the amount of sugarcane we milled that was grown on our owned and leased land or purchased from third parties:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | (In tons) |
| Grown on our owned and leased land | | 10,479,720 | | 10,464,893 | | 10,411,801 |
| Purchased from third parties | | 460,587 | | 638,307 | | 433,335 |
| Total | | 10,940,307 | | 11,103,200 | | 10,845,136 |
Sugarcane Harvesting Cycle
The annual sugarcane harvesting period in the center-south region of Brazil begins in April and ends in November/December of each year. In Mato Grosso do Sul, where our cluster is located, the weather pattern is less seasonal than in Sao Paulo. Our wet season is dryer and our dry season is more humid than traditional sugarcane regions. As a consequence of this weather pattern, the sugar content, or “TRS,” gap between the beginning and the end of the year compared to the peak of the harvest is much smaller than in São Paulo. This allows us to grow and harvest sugarcane year-round with a minimal impact on TRS.
Since the beginning of the 2016/2017 harvest year, we implemented a “non-stop” or “continuous” harvest. This means that we will harvest and crush sugarcane year-round, without stopping during the traditional off-season. This new strategy allows us to increase annual sugarcane milling and sugar, ethanol and energy production by approximately 10%. Another benefit of the system is that we produce ethanol in the off-season, when market prices usually have a high premium to prices at harvest. In addition, cogeneration efficiency is related to harvested volumes and unrelated to TRS, enabling us to utilize our cogeneration potential during the whole year. Considering that approximately 87% of total costs are fixed, this model has resulted not only in higher revenues but also in the dilution of our fixed costs.
We plant several sugarcane varieties, depending on the quality of the soil, the local microclimate and the estimated date of harvest of such area. Once planted, sugarcane can be harvested, once a year, up to six to eight consecutive years. With
each subsequent harvest, agricultural yields decrease. The plantations must be carefully managed and treated during the year in order to continue to attain sugar yields similar to a newly-planted crop.
We believe we own one of the most mechanized harvesting operations in Brazil. Our sugarcane harvesting process is currently 99% mechanized (100% at the Angélica and Ivinhema mills and 92% at the UMA mill) and the remaining 1% is harvested manually. Mechanized harvesting does not require burning prior to harvesting, significantly reducing environmental impact when compared to manual harvesting. In addition, the leaves that remain on the fields after the sugarcane has been harvested mechanically create a protective cover for the soil, reducing evaporation and protecting it from sunlight and erosion. This protective cover of leaves decomposes into organic material over time, which increases the fertility of the soil. Mechanized harvesting is more time efficient and has lower costs when compared to manual harvesting. Sugarcane is ready for harvesting when the crop’s sucrose content is at its highest level. Sucrose content and sugarcane yield (tons of cane per hectare) are important measures of productivity for our harvesting operations. Geographical factors, such as soil quality, topography and climate, as well as agricultural techniques that we implement, affect our productivity. Since most sugar mills produce both sugar and ethanol in variable mixes, the industry has adopted a conversion index for measuring sugar and ethanol production capacity, the Total Recoverable Sugar (“TRS”) index, which measures the amount of kilograms of sugar per ton of sugarcane.
During the 2021 harvest, our mills harvested sugarcane with an average TRS content of 128 kg/ton and an average yield of 69 tons of sugarcane per hectare, compared to 132 kg/ton and 79 tons per hectare in 2020, respectively.
Once sugarcane is harvested, it is transported to our mills for inspection and weighing. We utilize our own trucks and trailers for transportation purposes. The average transportation distance from the sugarcane fields to the mills is approximately 30 kilometers at the UMA mill and 33 kilometers at the Angélica and Ivinhema mills.
Our Sugar Mills
We currently own three sugar mills in Brazil—UMA, Angélica and Ivinhema. Our mills produce sugar, ethanol and energy, and have the flexibility to adjust the production mix between sugar and ethanol, to take advantage of more favorable market demand and prices at given points in time. As of December 31, 2021, our sugar mills had a total installed crushing capacity of 14.2 million tons of sugarcane, of which 13.0 million tons correspond to our sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul. As of December 31, 2021, we concluded the 2021 harvest crushing an aggregate volume of 10.9 million tons of sugarcane.
The UMA mill is located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and has a sugarcane crushing capacity of 1.2 million tons per year, full cogeneration capacity and an associated sugar brand with strong presence in the regional retail market (Açúcar Monte Alegre). UMA is also engaged in the production of organic sugar and, in 2020, it exported product for the first time, after having received the necessary certification to export organic sugar to the E.U. We plant and harvest 98.5% of the sugarcane milled at UMA, with the remaining 1.5% acquired from third parties. UMA concluded its harvest operations for the 2021 season crushing 816,000 tons of sugarcane.
Angélica is an advanced mill, completed in 2010 and located in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, with a total sugarcane crushing capacity of 5.6 million tons per year. The mill is equipped with two modern high pressure boilers and three turbo-generators with the capacity to generate approximately 105 MW of electricity through the use of sugarcane bagasse. The energy produced through this process is used to power the mill with an excess of 70 MW available for sale to the power grid. Angélica has the flexibility to vary production between ethanol and sugar from 60% to 40% for either product.
Our third mill, Ivinhema, is located in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, approximately 45 kilometers south of the Angelica mill. Ivinhema has a total sugarcane crushing capacity of 7.4 million tons per year. The mill is equipped with state-of-the-art technology including full cogeneration capacity, flexibility to produce sugar and ethanol and fully mechanized agricultural operations. Ivinhema has capacity to produce up to 371,306 tons of sugar, 371,306 cubic meters of ethanol and 612,000 MWh of energy exports.
Our Main Products
Sugar
As of December 31, 2021, our sugar production capacity was approximately 3,550 tons per day, which, in a normal year of 15,797 hours of milling, results in an annual sugar maximum production capacity of over 803,862 tons of sugar.
We produce three types of sugar: organic sugar, very high polarization, or “VHP” sugar, standard raw sugar and white crystal sugar. VHP sugar, a raw sugar with a minimum polarization of 99.00 degrees and a maximum polarization of 99.49
degrees of sucrose content, is similar to the type of sugar traded in major commodities exchanges, including the standard NY11 contract. The main difference between VHP sugar and NY11 raw sugar is the sugar content of VHP sugar, and it therefore commands a price premium over NY11 raw sugar. Crystal sugar is a non-refined white sugar (color 150 ICUMSA) produced directly from sugarcane juice.
As of December 31, 2021, our sugar production capacity was approximately 3,550 tons per day, which, in a normal year of 15,797 hours of milling, results in an annual sugar maximum production capacity of over 803,862 tons of sugar. Sugar sales comprised 11.0%, 20.9% and 18.5% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Sugar Production Process
There are essentially five steps in the sugar manufacturing process. First, we crush the sugarcane to extract the sugarcane juice. We then treat the juice to remove impurities. The residue is used to make an organic compost used as fertilizer in our sugarcane fields. The juice is then boiled until the sugar crystallizes, and sugar is then separated from the molasses (glucose which does not crystallize) by centrifugation. The resulting sugar is dried and sent to storage and/or packaging. We use the molasses in our production of ethanol.
On average, one metric ton of sugarcane contains 140 kilograms of TRS. While a mill can produce either sugar or ethanol, the TRS input requirements differ between these two products. On average, 1.045 kilograms of TRS equivalent are required to produce 1.0 kilogram of sugar, while the amount of TRS required to produce 1 liter of ethanol is 1.691 kilograms.
Ethanol
As of December 2021, our ethanol production capacity was approximately 3,200 cubic meters per day which, in a normal year of 15,797 hours of milling, results in maximum annual production capacity of over 738,220 cubic meters of ethanol.
We produce and sell two different types of ethanol: hydrous ethanol and anhydrous ethanol, as further described in the section below.
Ethanol sales comprised 42.1%, 24.3% and 26.0% of our total consolidated sales in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Since 2020 as part of the RenovaBio program, every time we sell ethanol we have the right to issue and sell carbon credits, which are traded on Brazil’s B3 platform. The number of carbon credits that are issued are determined by the score granted by the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas & Biofuels (ANP) based on how “green” the mill operation is deemed to be. During 2021 we sold 503.5 thousand CBios at an average price of R$41.20/CBio (average net price of US$7.30 per CBio). Please see “Our Company- 2. Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business” above.
Ethanol Production Process
Ethanol is produced through the fermentation of sugarcane juice or diluted molasses. Initially, we process the sugarcane used in ethanol production the same way that we process it for sugar production. The molasses resulting from this process is mixed with clear juice and then with yeast in fermentation vats, and the resulting wine has an ethanol content of approximately 8% to 10%. After the fermentation is complete, the yeast is separated for recycling in the ethanol production process. We distill the wine to obtain hydrous ethanol. In order to produce anhydrous ethanol, hydrous ethanol undergoes a dehydration process in a molecular sieve. The liquid remaining after these processes is called vinasse, which we further process to make liquid organic fertilizer that we use in our sugarcane plantations.
Cogeneration
We generate electricity from sugarcane bagasse (the fiber portion of sugarcane that remains after the extraction of sugarcane juice) in our three mills located in Brazil. As of December 31, 2021, total installed cogeneration capacity reached 241 MW. The ability to generate electricity from the by-product of the sugarcane crushing process on a large enough scale to fully power a mill with excess electricity being available is referred to as having full cogeneration capacity. Our three mills are duly licensed by the Brazilian Electricity Agency (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica, or “ANEEL”) to generate and sell electricity.
Cogeneration Production Process
Sugarcane is composed of water, fibers, sucrose and other sugars and minerals. When the sugarcane goes through the milling process, we separate the water, sugar and minerals from the fibers or sugarcane bagasse. Bagasse is an important subproduct of sugarcane, and it is used as fuel for the boilers in our mills. Sugarcane bagasse is burned in our state-of-the-art boilers to produce high pressure steam (68 atm) which is used in our high-efficiency turbo-generators to generate electricity to power our mills. The excess electricity, about 72% of production, is sold to the national power grid.
The following flow chart demonstrates the sugar, ethanol and cogeneration production process:
The main advantages of energy generated by sugarcane bagasse are:
•it is a clean and renewable energy;
•it complements hydropower, the main source of Brazilian energy, as it is generated during the sugarcane harvest period (April to December) when water reservoirs are at their lowest level;
•it requires a short period of time to start operations; and
•it requires only a small investment in transmission lines when plants are located close to consumer centers.
As of December 2021, our total installed cogeneration capacity at our cluster and UMA mill was 225 MW and 16 MW respectively, of which 155 MW and 12 MW are available to sell to the market.
We believe that there is a high potential for growth in the generation of electricity, and we are prepared to make investments to the extent economically viable.
Storage and Conditioning for the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business
Our sugar and ethanol storage and conditioning facilities are located at our mill sites and enable us to deliver our products when they are ready to be commercialized with no third-party involvement. Having such facilities at mill sites allows
us to (i) reduce storage and conditioning costs; (ii) reduce freight costs since we only commence moving the product once the final destination is determined, whether locally or to a port; and (iii) capitalize on fluctuations in the prices of sugar and ethanol.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nominal Storage Capacity | | Cluster | | UMA | | Total |
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 240,000 | | | 17,000 | | | 267,000 | |
| Sugar (tons) | | 110,000 | | | 19,100 | | | 129,100 | |
Marketing, Sales and Distribution for the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business
Sugar. We sell sugar both in the domestic and the international markets. Domestic sales are processed by our own brand “Açúcar Monte Alegre,” which is based in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Through this brand, we sell traditional and organic sugar, allowing us to have a competitive advantage amongst our peers. Prices for the sugar we export are set in accordance with international market prices, which are in turn determined in accordance with the ICE # 11 futures contracts. In the year ended December 31, 2021, our largest five customers in this segment accounted for approximately 95.6% of our sales, and the remaining 2% was dispersed among several customers.
Ethanol. Almost all of our ethanol sales are to the domestic Brazilian market. Approximately 48% of our ethanol sales are made through formal agreements. The remainder is sold through daily sales orders through specialized brokerage firms or directly with distribution companies and the prices for these transactions are set using the CEPEA/ESALQ hydrous ethanol index as a reference. Our largest five customers by volume accounted for approximately 55% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Cogeneration. We also sell electricity cogenerated at our sugar and ethanol mills to the grid. Sales are made to commercialization companies, in the spot market, to distributors and through government auctions in long-term contracts. Our largest six customers accounted for approximately 60% of our sales revenues in the year ended December 31, 2021.
ANEEL has organized yearly auctions for alternative energy and for renewable sources at favored rates. As a hedging strategy, we sell the electricity production of our mills through long-term contracts adjusted for inflation by reference to the “IPCA”.
In 2009, Angélica sold energy in a public auction carried out by the Brazilian Electricity Sales Chamber (Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica, or the “CCEE,” and entered into a 15-year agreement with CCEE for the sale of 87,600 MWh per year at a rate of R$312.46 per MWh (in 2021). In August 2010, Angélica participated in a public auction, whereupon Angélica entered into a second 15-year agreement with CCEE starting in 2011 for the sale of 131,400 MWh per year at a rate of R$278.80 per MWh (in 2021). The delivery period is April to December for the first auction and March to November for the second auction. The rates under both agreements are adjusted annually for inflation by reference to the IPCA.
Land Transformation Business
Land transformation is an important element of our business model and a driver of value creation. Through land transformation, we optimize land use and increase the productive potential and value of our farmland. Our land transformation model consists of changing the use of underutilized or undermanaged agricultural land to more profitable cash generatingcash-generating agricultural activities, such as turning low cash-yieldinglow-cash-yielding cattle pasture land into high cash-yielding croppablehigh-cash-yielding arable land, allowing profitable agricultural activities, such as crop, rice and sugarcane production.
Since our inception, we have successfully identified multiple opportunities for the acquisition of undeveloped or undermanaged farmland with high potential for transformation. During the seventeen-year19-year period since our inception, we have effectively put into production over 171 thousand171,000 hectares that were previously undeveloped or inefficiently managed and are undergoing the transformation process.
The land transformation process begins by determining the productive potential of each plot of land. This will vary according to soil properties, climate, productive risks, and the available technology in each specific region. Before commencing the transformation process, we perform environmental impact studies to evaluate the potential impact on the local ecosystem, with the goal of promoting environmentally responsible agricultural production and ecosystem preservation, thereby supporting sustainable land use. We do not operate in heavily wooded areas or primarily wetland areas.
The transformation process for undeveloped and undermanaged land requires us to make initial investments during a period of one to up to three years, and the land reaches stable productive capability the third to seventh year following commencement of the land transformation activities.
We are engaged in three different categories of the land transformation process, which are defined by the previous use of the land:
•Undeveloped land (savannahs and natural grasslands): This is the most drastic transformation phase since it demands both physical and chemical transformation of the soil. First, the land is mechanically cleared to remove native vegetation. The soil is then mechanically leveled for agricultural operations: in the case of land being transformed for rice production, this process involves heavy land movements and systematization required for irrigation and drainage channels, roads and bridges. In the case of land destined for sugarcane plantations, land movements will also be necessary for the construction of terraces to prevent the excess of water runoff. Certain soils must be chemically treated and corrected by incorporating nutrients such as limestone, gypsum and phosphorous, as is the case of the Brazilian ‘Cerrado’.Cerrado Region. Soil correction is not required in Argentina or Uruguay due to the natural fertility of the soil. Pesticides and fertilizers are then applied to the soil in preparation for planting. In the case of land destined for crop production (grains and oilseeds), soybean, which is sometimes referred to as a colonizing crop, is usually planted during the first years due to its resistance to pests, weeds and extreme weather and soil conditions. Thereafter, the land will enter into a crop rotation scheme to reduce the incidence of plague and disease and to balance soil nutrients. In the case erofof rice and sugar cane, which are produced in a monoculture system, there is no colonizing crop or rotation involved. Intensive plague and weed controls and additional soil correction will take place during these first three to five years. Land productivity or yields, measured in tons of soybean or other crops per hectare, will be initially low and will gradually increase year by year. During the first five to seven years, the yields will increase at high and sustained rates. After the seventh year, we consider the land developed as yield volatility is reduced and growth is only achievable at marginal rates. Since our inception in 2002, we have put into production about 70 thousand70,000 hectares of undeveloped land into productive croppablearable land.
•Undermanaged or underutilized farmland (cultivated pastures and poorly managed agriculture): This transformation process is lighter than the one described above since it does not require the initial mechanical clearing of vegetation or land leveling. Only in the case of land being prepared for rice production will leveling be required for efficient flood-
irrigation.flood-irrigation. The transformation of cattle pastures or poor agriculture in the Brazilian ‘Cerrado’Cerrado region will begin with soil correction and soil tillage in preparation for planting of the first soybean or sugarcane crop. The process will then continue as described in the case above. Land productivity or crop yields will grow at high rates during the first three to five years of the transformation process and will then commence to stabilize and grow at marginal rates, at which point we consider the land developed. Since our inception in 2002, we have put into production over 101 thousand100,000 hectares of undermanaged or underutilized farmland into croppablearable land.
•Ongoing transformation of croppablearable land: The application of efficient and sustainable crop production technologies and best practices such as “no-till”,“no-till,” crop rotations, integrated pest and weed management, and balanced fertilization, among others, incrementally increases soil quality and land productivity over time, maximizing return on invested capital and increasing the land value of our properties. Our entire farmland portfolio is constantly undergoing this phase of land transformation.
In each of these categories of transformation, the metric the company useswe use to track the level and analyze the progress of the transformation process is the level and tendency of crop yields and the number of years the land has been under crop production. Consequently, the process of land transformation is evidenced by the results of the activities within our other business segments, primarily our crops, rice and sugarcane segments. Accordingly the costs associated with the transformation process described above are allocated within these other business segments. As a result, there may be variations in our results from one season to the next according to the amount of farmland undergoing transformation and the amount of land sold and our ability to identify and acquire new farmland.
Our land transformation segment seeks not only to profit from crop and rice cultivation, but also from the opportunistic disposition of successfully transformed farmland. We strategically sell farms that have reached productive maturity with marginal potential for further productivity increases (years three to seven after commencing the land transformation process) to realize and monetize the capital gains arising from the land transformation process. Land transformation proceeds are in turn reinvested in the purchase of strategic farmland with potential for transformation and appreciation. The rotation of our land portfolio allows us to allocate capital efficiently. Since 2006 we have had a solid track
record of selling farmland and achieving profitable returns. During the last thirteen15 years, we have sold2325 farms, generating capital gains of approximately $240US$250 million.
These capital gains are generated by three main factors:
(i) the acquisition of land at opportunistic prices below the market value or fair value of the land;
(ii) the land transformation and ongoing land transformation process described above enhances the productivity and profitability of land, ultimately increasing the value of the land; and
(iii) general market appreciation of land driven by increase in commodity prices and supply and demand dynamics in the land market. In this regard, during the last 30 years, since 1977, farmland prices in Argentina’s core production region have increased an average of 8.1% per year according to data published by Margenes Agropecuarios. The value of the farms we sold as well as our overall land portfolio, has mostly been positively impacted by this external factor.
We believe we are one of the most active players in the land business in South America. Since our inception in 2002, we have executed transactions for the purchase and sale of land for over $740US$780 million. Our business development team is responsible for analyzing, selecting, acquiring and selling land. The team has gained extensive expertise in evaluating and acquiring farmland throughout South America, and has a solid understanding of the productivity potential of each region and of the potential for land transformation and appreciation. Since 2002, the team has analyzed over 11 million hectares of farmland with a total value of approximately $16US$16 billion. We have developed a methodology to analyze investment opportunities, taking into account price, transformation potential, productive model, financial projections, and investment requirements, among others. Our analysis also employs advanced information technology, including the use of satellite images, rain and temperature records, soil analysis, and topography and drainage maps. From time to time, we may leverage our favorable position in and knowledge of the land market to engage in opportunistic buying and selling transactions.
The following table sets forth our acquisitions and divestitures since our inception:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Acquisition | | Divestitures | | Total Land Holdings |
| Year Ended December 31, | | (in hectares) |
| 2002 | | 74,898 | | | — | | | 74,898 | |
| 2003 | | — | | | — | | | 74,898 | |
| 2004 | | 34,659 | | | — | | | 109,557 | |
| 2005 | | 22,262 | | | — | | | 131,819 | |
| 2006 | | 5,759 | | | 3,507 | | | 134,071 | |
| 2007 | | 113,197 | | | 8,714 | | | 239,274 | |
| 2008 | | 43,783 | | | 4,857 | | | 278,200 | |
| 2009 | | — | | | 5,005 | | | 273,195 | |
| 2010 | | 14,755 | | | 5,086 | | | 282,864 | |
| 2011 | | 12,992 | | | 2,439 | | | 293,417 | |
| 2012 | | — | | | 9,475 | | | 283,942 | |
| 2013 | | — | | | 14,176 | | | 269,766 | |
| 2014 | | — | | | 12,887 | | | 257,036 | |
| 2015 | | — | | | 10,905 | | | 246,139 | |
| 2016 | | — | | | — | | | 246,139 | |
| 2017 | | — | | | — | | | 246,139 | |
| 2018 | | — | | | 14,427 | | | 231,712 | |
| 2019 | | — | | | 6,082 | | | 225,630 | |
| 2020 | | — | | | 5,444 | | | 220,186 | |
| 2021 | | — | | | 336(*) | | 219,850 | |
(*) 336 hectares of industrial parks in Brazil were excluded from the calculation, although not technically divested.
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Acquisition | | Divestitures | | Total Land Holdings |
| Year Ended December 31, | | (In hectares) |
| 2002 | | 74,898 |
| | — |
| | 74,898 |
|
| 2003 | | — |
| | — |
| | 74,898 |
|
| 2004 | | 34,659 |
| | — |
| | 109,557 |
|
| 2005 | | 22,262 |
| | — |
| | 131,819 |
|
| 2006 | | 5,759 |
| | 3,507 |
| | 134,071 |
|
| 2007 | | 113,197 |
| | 8,714 |
| | 238,554 |
|
| 2008 | | 43,783 |
| | 4,857 |
| | 277,480 |
|
| 2009 | | — |
| | 5,005 |
| | 272,475 |
|
| 2010 | | 14,755 |
| | 5,086 |
| | 282,144 |
|
| 2011 | | 12,992 |
| | 2,439 |
| | 292,697 |
|
| 2012 | | — |
| | 9,475 |
| | 283,222 |
|
| 2013 | | — |
| | 14,176 |
| | 269,046 |
|
| 2014 | | — |
| | 12,887 |
| | 256,159 |
|
| 2015 | | — |
| | 10,905 |
| | 245,254 |
|
| 2016 | | — |
| | — |
| | 245,254 |
|
| 2017 | | — |
| | — |
| | 245,254 |
|
| 2018 | | — |
| | 14,427 |
| | 230,827 |
|
| 2019 | | — |
| | 6,082 |
| | 224,745 |
|
Our Farms
The table below sets forth the name, location, size and current use of our farms:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Farm | | State, Country | | Gross Size
(Hectares) | | Current Use |
| El Meridiano | | Buenos Aires, Argentina | | 6,302 | | | Grains |
| Las Horquetas | | Buenos Aires, Argentina | | 2,086 | | | Grains & Cattle |
| San Carlos | | Buenos Aires, Argentina | | 4,215 | | | Grains |
La Carolina(2) | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 4,306 | | | Grains & Cattle |
El Orden(2) | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 3,506 | | | Grains & Cattle |
| La Rosa | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 4,087 | | | Grains & Cattle |
| San Joaquín | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 37,273 | | | Rice, Grains & Cattle |
| Carmen | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 10,021 | | | Grains |
| Abolengo | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 6,662 | | | Grains |
| Santa Lucia | | Santiago del Estero, Argentina | | 17,495 | | | Grains & Cattle |
| El Colorado | | Santiago del Estero, Argentina | | 4,960 | | | Grains |
La Guarida (1) | | Santiago del Estero, Argentina | | 7,880 | | | Grains & Cattle |
La Garrucha (1) | | Salta, Argentina | | 1,839 | | | Grains |
Los Guayacanes (1) | | Salta, Argentina | | 3,693 | | | Grains |
| Ombú | | Formosa, Argentina | | 18,321 | | | Grains & Cattle |
| Oscuro | | Corrientes, Argentina | | 33,429 | | | Rice, Grains & Cattle |
| Itá Caabó | | Corrientes, Argentina | | 22,888 | | | Rice, Grains & Cattle |
| Bela Manhã | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 381 | | | Sugarcane |
| Ouro Verde | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 679 | | | Sugarcane |
| Don Fabrício | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 3,302 | | | Sugarcane |
| Takuarê | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 298 | | | Sugarcane |
| Agua Branca | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 1,614 | | | Sugarcane |
| Nossa Senhora Aparecida | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 540 | | | Sugarcane |
| Sapálio | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 6,140 | | | Sugarcane |
| La Pecuaria | | Duranzo, Uruguay | | 3,177 | | | Grains |
| Doña Marina | | Corrientes, Argentina | | 14,755 | | | Rice |
| Total | | | | 219,850 | | | |
(1) In June 2014, we completed the sale of a 49.0% interest in Global Anceo S.L.U and Global Hisingen S.L.U, two Spanish subsidiaries that owned the La Guarida, La Garrucha and Los Guayacanes farms.
(2) In December 2015, we completed the sale of a 49% interest in Global Acamante S.L.U, Global Calidon S.L.U, Global Carelio S.L.U, and Global Mirabilis S.L.U, whose main underlying assets are El Orden and La Carolina farms.
A substantial portion of our assets consists of rural real estate. The agricultural real estate market in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay is particularly characterized by volatility and illiquidity. As a result, we may experience difficulties in immediately adjusting our portfolio of rural properties in response to any alterations in the economic or business environments. The volatility of the local market could affect our ability to sell and receive the proceeds from such sales, which could give rise to a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industries—A substantial portion of our assets is farmland that is highly illiquid.”
Appraisal of Farms. In September 2019, in order2021, to assess the market value of rural properties in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay, we requested an appraisal by Cushman & Wakefield Argentina S.A., an independent real estate valuation firm knowledgeable aboutwith experience in the agriculture industry and the local real estate market. As part of these appraisals, the value of each of our properties was determined using the sales comparison approach taking into account current offerings and prices buyers had recently paid for
comparable sites, adjusted for the differences between comparable properties and the subject property to arrive at an estimate of the value. The major elements of comparison used to value the properties included the property rights conveyed, the financial terms incorporated into the transaction, the conditions or motivations surrounding the sale, changes in market conditions since the sale, the location of the real estate and the physical characteristics of the property.
The above mentionedThese valuations assumed good and marketable title to subject properties, which were assumed to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The valuation did not include site measurements and no surveys of the subject properties were undertaken. In addition, the valuations also assumed (a) responsible ownership and competent management of the subject properties; (b) there were no hidden or unapparent conditions of the subject properties, subsoil or structures that render the subject properties more or less valuable; (c) full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local zoning and environmental regulations and laws and (d) all required licenses, certificates of occupancy and other governmental consents were or can be obtained and renewed for any use on which the value opinion contained in the appraisals is based. Unless otherwise stated in the appraisals, the existence of potentially hazardous or toxic materials that may have been used in the construction or maintenance of the improvements or may be located at or about the subject properties was not considered in arriving at the appraisal of value. These materials (such as formaldehyde foam insulation, asbestos insulation and other potentially hazardous materials) may adversely affect the value of the subject properties.
Cushman & Wakefield has informed us their assessment of the market value of our farmland as of September 30, 2019.2021. According to Cushman & Wakefield, the market value of our farmland totaled $766.8US$759.6 million, out of which $703.5US$685.9 million correspond to the market value of our farmland in Argentina and Uruguay, and the remaining $63.3US$73.7 million correspond to the market value of our farmland in Brazil. Net of minority interests in certain Argentine farms, the market value of our farmland totaled $716.7US$709.8 million. These valuations are only intended to provide an indicative approximation of the market value of our farmland property as of September 30, 20192021 based on then current market conditions. This information is subject to change based on a host of variables and market conditions.
|
| | | | | | | |
Farm | | State, Country | | Gross Size
(Hectares)
| | Current Use |
El Meridiano | | Buenos Aires, Argentina | | 6,302 |
| | Grains |
Las Horquetas | | Buenos Aires, Argentina | | 2,086 |
| | Grains & Cattle |
San Carlos | | Buenos Aires, Argentina | | 4,215 |
| | Grains |
Huelen | | La Pampa, Argentina | | 4,633 |
| | Grains |
La Carolina(2)
| | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 4,306 |
| | Grains & Cattle |
El Orden(2)
| | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 3,506 |
| | Grains & Cattle |
La Rosa | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 4,087 |
| | Grains & Cattle |
San Joaquín | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 37,273 |
| | Rice, Grains & Cattle |
Carmen | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 10,021 |
| | Grains |
Abolengo | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 7,473 |
| | Grains |
Santa Lucia | | Santiago del Estero, Argentina | | 17,495 |
| | Grains & Cattle |
El Colorado | | Santiago del Estero, Argentina | | 4,960 |
| | Grains |
La Guarida (1)
| | Santiago del Estero, Argentina | | 7,880 |
| | Grains & Cattle |
La Garrucha (1)
| | Salta, Argentina | | 1,839 |
| | Grains |
Los Guayacanes (1)
| | Salta, Argentina | | 3,693 |
| | Grains |
Ombú | | Formosa, Argentina | | 18,321 |
| | Grains & Cattle |
Oscuro | | Corrientes, Argentina | | 33,429 |
| | Rice, Grains & Cattle |
Itá Caabó | | Corrientes, Argentina | | 22,888 |
| | Rice, Grains & Cattle |
Bela Manhã | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 381 |
| | Sugarcane |
Ouro Verde | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 679 |
| | Sugarcane |
Don Fabrício | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 3,302 |
| | Sugarcane |
Takuarê | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 489 |
| | Sugarcane |
Agua Branca | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 1,614 |
| | Sugarcane |
Nossa Senhora Aparecida | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 540 |
| | Sugarcane |
Sapálio | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 6,140 |
| | Sugarcane |
Carmen (Agua Santa) | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | 146 |
| | Sugarcane |
La Pecuaria | | Duranzo, Uruguay | | 3,177 |
| | Grains |
Doña Marina | | Corrientes, Argentina | | 14,755 |
| | Rice |
Total | | | | 225,630 |
| | |
(1) On June 2014, we completed the sale of a 49.0% interest in Global Anceo S.L.U and Global Hisingen S.L.U, two Spanish subsidiaries that owned La Guarida, La Garrucha and Los Guayacanes farms.
(2) On December 2015, we completed the sale of a 49% interest in Global Acamante S.L.U, Global Calidon S.L.U, Global Carelio S.L.U, and Global Mirabilis S.L.U, whose main underlying assets are El Orden and La Carolina.
A substantial portion of our assets consists of rural real estate. The agricultural real estate market in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay is particularly characterized by volatility and illiquidity. As a result, we may experience difficulties in immediately adjusting our portfolio of rural properties in response to any alterations in the economic or business environments. The volatility of the local market could affect our ability to sell and receive the proceeds from such sales, which could give rise to a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. See
-Risks "Item 3. Key Information—D. Risks Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industries-AIndustries— .A substantial portion of our assets is farmland that is highly illiquid.”
Land Leasing and Agriculture Partnerships. We enter into operating lease agreements based on criteria regarding the quality and projected profitability of the property, as well as our production and yield objectives in the short or medium term. Generally, we become aware of farms available for lease directly through the owners of farms near our farms and in some cases through regional brokers.
We tend to be more open to leasing farmland for sugarcane production than for our farmingFarming businesses, where we own the majority of the land that we farm. We lease land for our sugarcane production primarily because leases in this sector are long term, lasting between one or two sugarcane cycles (with each cycle lasting generally 6six years), which allows us to implement and reap the productivity benefits of our land transformation strategies. Sugarcane lease payments are established in terms of tons of sugarcane per hectare, depending on the productivity of the land in terms of tons per hectare and sucrose content per hectare and also on the distance from the land to the mill. Sugarcane prices are based on the market value of the sugarcane set forth by the regulations of the State of Sao Paulo Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Growers Counsel (Conselho dos Produtores de Cana-de-Açúcar, Açúcar e Álcool do Estado de Sao Paulo, or “Consecana”).Consecana regulations. Given the strategic location of our mills in the region and the inherent inefficiency of growing crops other than sugarcane in this region, we expect to be able to renew our leases for the sugarcane farmland with minimal issues.
With respect to our farmingFarming business, the initial duration of lease agreements is generally one harvest year. Leases of farmland for production of grains include agreements with both fixed and variable lease payments in local currency or U.S. dollars per hectare.
Land Management. We manage our land through an executive committee composed of a country manager, regional manager, farm manager and members of the Technology Adecoagro Group, (“TAG”) thator “TAG,” which meet on a monthly basis. We delegate individual farm management to farm managers, who are responsible for farm operations and receive advisory support from TAG to analyze and determine the most suitable and efficient technologies to be applied. Our executive committee establishes commercial and production rules based on sales, market expectations and risk allocation, and fulfilling production procedures and protocols.
Following an acquisition of property, we make investments in technology in order to improve productivity and to increase its value. Occasionally when we purchase property, a parcel of the property is sub-utilizedsubutilized or the infrastructure may be
in need of improvement, including traditional fencing and electrical fencing, irrigation equipment and machinery, among other things.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Industrial Facilities
In addition to our farmland, we also own the following principal industrial facilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Facility | | Province, Country | | Relevant
Operational Data | | Current Use |
| “Christophersen” | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 12,500 tons of storage capacity. 2,880 tons per day of drying capacity | | Seedbed and stockpiling plant (1) |
| | | | | | |
Facility"Las Horquetas" | | Province, CountryBuenos Aires, Argentina | | Relevant
Operational Data
| | Current Use |
“Christophersen” | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 18,70024,500 tons of storage capacity. 2,4005,760 tons per day of drying capacity for grains | | SeedbedStorage, handling and stockpiling plant (1)
conditioning |
| “Semillero Itá Caabó” | | Corrientes, Argentina | | - | | Rice genetic improvement program |
| | | | | | |
| “Molino Ala — Mercedes” | | Corrientes, Argentina | | Installed capacity of 6,516 tons
of white rice monthly, and husk rice drying capacity of 2,250 tons per day
| | Rice processing and drying plant |
| | | | | | |
| “Molino Ala — San Salvador” | | Entre Ríos, Argentina | | Installed capacity of 5,779 tons
of white rice monthly, and husk rice drying capacity of 1,950 tons per day
| | Rice processing and drying plant |
| | | | | | |
| Molino Franck | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | Processing capacity of 6,924 tons of white rice monthly, and husk rice drying capacity of 1,650 tons per day | | Rice processing and drying plant |
| | | | | | |
Free-Stall I, Free-Stall II, III and Free-Stall IIIIV | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | Production capacity of 135more than 180 million liters of raw milk 10,500
11,104 milking cows
| | Raw milk production |
Bio-digester | | | | | | |
| Biodigester | | Santa Fe, Argentina | | 1.4 MW capacity | | Energy generation |
| | | | | | |
| Morteros Facility | | Córdoba, Argentina | | Production capacity of 850,000840,000 liters per day
Reception capacity of 1.51.2 million liters per day
Storage capacity of 1.624.3 million liters
| | Milk processing facility producing milk powder and semi-hard cheese. Sells products to the export market |
| Chivilcoy Facility | | Buenos Aires, Argentina | | Production capacity of 925,000555,000 liters per day
Reception capacity of 800,0001.2 million liters per day
Storage capacity of 4,100 pallets
1.5 million liters of fluid milk | | Milk processing facility, producing UHT UP milk, yogurt, cream and yogurt.cocoa flavored milk. Sells products to the domestic market |
| "Maní del Plata" | | Córdoba, Argentina | | Shelling capacity of 80,000 tons, blanching capacity of 36,000 tons.
Storage capacity of 60,00050,000 tons of inshellin-shell and 7,00010,000 tons of finished product | | Peanut processing facility producing raw and blanched peanut.peanuts. Sells mainly to the export market |
| "Girasoles del Plata" | | Buenos Aires, Argentina | | Processing capacity of 6 tons/hour of confectionary and 6 tons/hour of bakery.
Storage capacity of 4,000 tons of confectionary. | | Sunflower processing facility producing confectionary and bakery sunflower. Sells mainly to the export market |
| “Angélica Agroenergía” | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | Installed milling capacity of 5.6 million tons of sugarcane annually, 355,500347,641 tons of VHP sugar, and over 311,000 312,877 cubic meters of ethanol, and over 370,000504,000 MWh of energy exports. | | Sugar and ethanol mill producing hydrated ethanol, anhydrous ethanol and VHP sugar. Sells energy to local network |
|
| | | | | | |
| “Ivinhema Agroenergía” | | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil | | Installed milling capacity of
7.4 million tons of
sugarcane annually, 441,500371,306 tons of VHP sugar, 444,000 371,306 cubic meters of ethanol, and over 500,000612,000 MWh of energy exports. | | Sugar and ethanol mill producing hydrated ethanol, anhydrous ethanol and VHP sugar. Sells energy to local the network |
| | | | | | |
| |
(1) | Classification of wheat and soybean seeds. |
(1)Classification of wheat and soybean seeds.
For additional information regarding our property, plant and equipment, see Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Customers
We sell manufactured and agricultural products to a large base of customers. The type and class of customers may differ depending on our business segments, regions and some logistics issues that are very important in our decision making. Fordecision-making. In the year ended December 31, 20192021, more than 85%90% of our sales of crops were sold to ten10 well-known customers, both multinational orinternational and local. Of these customers, the first three casesfive customers represented almost 58%70% of our sales, and the remaining tenfive customers represented approximately 27%20% of our net sales in the course of that year.
2021.
In the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, sales of ethanol were concentrated in eightfive customers, which represented 78%77% of total sales of ethanol forin the year ended December 31, 2019.2021. Approximately 80%98% of our sales of sugar were concentrated in sixfive customers forin the year ended December 31, 2019. The2021; the remaining 20%2% was dispersed among several customers. In 2019,2021, energy sales were 78%60% concentrated in six major customers.
Competition
The farming sector is highly fragmented. Although we are one of South America’s leading producers, due to the atomized nature of the farming sector, our overall market share in some of the industries in which we participate is insubstantial. Our production volume, however, improves our ability to negotiate favorable supply, transportation and delivery logistics with our suppliers, third-party transporters, ports and other facilities, and customers. Although competition in agriculture varies considerably by product and sector, in general, there are a large number of producers, and each one of them controls only a small portion of the total production. Therefore, individual producers often have little influence on the market and cause little or no effect on market prices as a result of their individual strategies, explaining why producers are price takers and not price makers. In many cases, the price is established in international market exchanges. As the majority of agricultural products are commodities, which stifles product differentiation, the principal competition factors are cost of production and volume efficiency gains. In addition, agricultural producers face strong foreign competition, and with this competition the factors are often more difficult to identify.
The majority of farming producers in developed countries can rely on specific protectionist policies and subsidies from their governments in order to maintain their position in the market. In general, we have been able to obtain discounts for the acquisition of supplies and excess prices for our production in the farming sector. In this sector, we view SLC Agrícola S.A., BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, Sollus Agrícola, Radar Propriedades Agrícolas, El Tejar S.A., Cresud SACIF y A, MSU S.A. and Los Grobo Agropecuaria, among others, as our competitors. We also compete in Argentina with retailers of agricultural products, including other branded rice products, such as Molinos Río de la Plata S.A., Dos Hermanos S.H., Sagemüller S.A. and Cooperativa Arroceros Villa Elisa Ltda.
The sugar and ethanol industries are highly competitive. In Brazil, we compete with numerous small-and medium-sized sugar and ethanol producers. Despite increased consolidation, the Brazilian sugar and ethanol industries remain highly fragmented, with more than 384422 sugar mills. Some of the largest industry players with whom we compete are Raizen, Biosev, Atvos, Tereos, São Martinho, Bunge, Santa Terezinha, Lincoln Junqueira and Coruripe. We also face competition from international sugar producers, such as those in the U.S. and the European Union, where local regulators have historically implemented tariffs, agriculture subsidies and/or other governmental incentive programs, of which some remain, to protect local sugar producers from foreign competition.
The following table describes the Brazilian competitive landscape:
|
| | | | |
| Brazil |
| Number of Mills | 384422 |
|
| Sugarcane crushed (million tons) | 620.4568.4 |
|
| Ethanol Production (million cubic meters) | 32.428.3 |
|
| Sugar Production (million tons) | 29.033.9 |
|
Source: Ministry of Agriculture &and CONAB
With respect to farmland, there have historically been few companies competing to acquire and lease farmland for the purpose of benefiting from land appreciation and optimization of yields in different commercial activities. However, we believe that new companies, may become active players in the acquisition of farmland and the leasing of sown land, which would add competitors to the market in coming years.
Supplies and Suppliers
Our principal supplies for our farmingFarming business are seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and fuel, which represented 9%8.6%, 8%6.7%, 12%12.1% and 5%3.6%, respectively, of our total direct costs (including leasing cost). in 2021. Further, these supplies represented 35%27.5% of our total cost of production (including manufacturing and administrative expenses) for 2019.in 2021. As we use direct sowing in 99% of our planted area, without requiring soil preparation, fuel represents only 5%3.2% of the total cost of production for 2019.
2021.
Our principal supplies for our sugar, ethanolSugar, Ethanol and energyEnergy business are diesel, lubricants and fertilizers, which collectively represented 18%18.9% of our total cost of production (including manufacturing and administrative expenses) in the sugar, ethanol and energy business for 2019.2021. We have an extensive network of suppliers for each of our business segments and for each required input within each segment, resulting in lower reliance on any particular supplier. Our ten10 largest suppliers account for 28.34%30.6% of our total expenditures for supplies in 2019.2021. While we value the relationships we have developed with each of our suppliers given the quality we have come to expect, we do not consider any single supplier to be key to our production.
We have been able to obtain lower prices particularly due to the volume that derives from our large-scale operations.
Seasonality
Our business activities are inherently seasonal. We generally harvest and sell most of our grains (corn, soybean, rice and sunflower) between February and August, with the exception of wheat, which is harvested from December to January. Peanut is harvested from April to May, and sales are executed with higher intensity during the third quarter of the year. Cotton is unique in that while it is typically harvested from June to August, it requires processing which takes about two to three months to complete. Sales in our dairyDairy business segment tend to be more stable. However, milk production is generally higher during the fourth quarter, when the weather is more suitable for production. In general terms, processing of rice and milk tend to be more stable during the year. Although our Sugar, Ethanol and Electricity cluster is currently operating under a “non-stop” or “continuous” harvest and without stopping during traditional off-season, the rest of the sector in Brazil is still primarily operating with large off-season periods from December/January to March/April. The result of large off-season periods is fluctuations in our sugar and ethanol sales and in our inventories, usually peaking in December to take advantage of higher prices during the traditional off-season period (i.e., January through April). As a result of the above factors, there may be significant variations in our financial results from one quarter to another. In addition, our quarterly results may vary as a result of the effects of fluctuations in commodities prices, production yields and costs on the determination of changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-A. Operating Results-Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates-Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce.”
Sustainability
Our production model is based on sustainability standards that seek to produce food and renewable energy on a long-term basis. Those standards include best practices and certifications that promote development and health, customer satisfaction and stakeholders' interest, neighboring community welfare, food care and food safety, and environmental protection. Accordingly, our sustainable approach to farming requires that we take into account not only economic, but also social and environmental aspects specifically adapted to local circumstances. We believe we accomplish these goals through a team committed to our values: trust, transparency, efficiency, innovation, safety and sustainability.
In 2021, we continued to work towards integrating environmental, social, and governance criteria, or “ESG" criteria, into our business model. On this path towards the triple generation of value, we formalized the creation of an ESG committee to evaluate our performance, monitor our advances and identify opportunities for improvement. The analysis of the impact of sustainability trends in our business is also part of our agenda.
In 2021, we also made progress in defining key environmental performance indicators by business that mark our path in generating a positive environmental impact. Our commitments lead us to permanently think about people, including members of our value chain and communities, and the conservation of our planet. Going forward, we will continue to innovate, be transparent, and report on our progress to accelerate our vision for a better and more inclusive future.
Personnel
Our people
We constantly care about theThe development, health and safety of our employees.personnel is important to us. We also promote enhanced working conditions, while we support training and internal education programs to improve skills and educate with the newest technologies and business practices. We implement and constantly revise our health and safety programs in each of our businesses.
Standardized and Scalable Agribusiness Model
We have adopted an agribusiness model that allows us to engage in large-scale farming activities in an efficient and sustainable manner. Our agribusiness model consists of developing a specialized workforce and defining standard protocols to track crop development and control production variables, thereby enhancing efficient decision making and facilitating continuous improvement. This approach allows us to grow in scale, execute our expansion plan and efficiently manage various production units spread across different regions by effectively replicating our productive model. Process standardization also helps us assure compliance with local lawlaws and regulations and reduce social and environmental risks.
We continue to develop and implement crop protocols. The purpose of these protocols is to coordinate and consolidate the knowledge on crop management for each area in order to standardize the implementation of these protocols. The protocols contain all the technical information for managing crops. This information is constantly reviewed by agricultural teams and their advisors, making it possible to preserve the technical knowledge of the company and at the same time improve agricultural production and make decisions pursuant to the company’s guidelines. Based on the results of the application of these protocols, we conduct an annual review of the techniques used and their results. This evaluation is done by means of crop campaign analysis, in which all teams review and discuss the last harvest year’s productive performance and the technological package for the new harvest year.
When processes and protocols are defined, they can be audited and certified by qualified third parties. Adecoagro hasWe previously certified itsour crop and rice production in Argentina under ISO 9001, its biodigestor900, and re currently certifying our biodigester energy generation in Argentina under ISO 14001 and RTRS in mostthe Round Table on Responsible Soybeans standard, or “RTRS,” for some of our crop operating units. In addition to this, in 2021, we implemented our paddy rice production under the Sustainable Agriculture Initiative scheme.
In order to achieve efficient scales of production, we have redesigned our field sizes by removing useless cattle infrastructure such as fencing. Larger fields reduce the overlapping of farmworks,farm works, enhancing operating efficiency, reducing the use of inputs and achieving agronomic timing (planting or harvesting on time). The goal is to reduce operative time and to improve efficiency in the use of inputs. Large-scale production also requires the implementation of advanced technology such as GPS (GlobalGlobal Positioning System), GIS (GeographicSystem, or “GPS,” Geographic Information System)System or "GIS", and modern machinery as well.
We are also adopting operational protocols and procedures in our industrial facilities to improve control of processing variables. Both of our milk processing facilities have been certified under the FSSC 22000 standard (Food Safety System Certification), and our Morteros facility has also obtained Kosher and Halal certifications.halal certification. In our rice mills, the FSSC 22000 standard is currently under implementation, we have been audited for the FSSC Global Market standard, and two of our mills have obtained the Kosherkosher certification. RegardingIn our cropCrops business, our peanut processing facility has been certified for Kosherkosher and halal, and BRC standard for food safety, and is currently implementing Halal;safety; while our sunflower processing facility has obtained the FSSC 22000 standard and Kosher certification.kosher and halal certifications. Most of our industrial facilities are either implementing or have been audited by SMETA,the Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit, which validates our compliance with health, safety and safetyhuman rights practices, throughouttogether with environmental applicable legislation. Similarly, in 2021, we were subjected to audits under specific standards of our clients at our Chivilcoy milk processing plant, which covered topics such as asset security and corporate social responsibility. We were successful in these audits, which enabled us to continue with the supply chain.relevant commercial relationships.
When market conditions provide price premiums for certified grains or oilseeds, we evaluate the feasibility of implementing specific certifications. Some examples of this are RTRS (Round Table on Responsible Soybeans) and EPA (Environmental Protection Agency, US) certifications for Sustainable Soybeanssustainable soybeans in Argentina. In Brazil, we are certifying sugar-based products for EPA.EPA, Bonsucro certifications and Organic Sugar Certification (Usina Monte Alegre).
certifications at our UMA mill.
Contractors
Contractors play a significant role in our farmingFarming business model. If cost competitive, we seek to outsource most of the typical farm work, such as planting, spraying and harvesting. Outsourcing allows us to reduce our investments in heavy machinery and equipment such as tractors or harvesters, enhancing the efficient allocation of our capital in our core productive activities. Notwithstanding, we are reviewing the contractor model and comparing it with the use of own machinery in some of our crops and rice operations. We are willing to develop our own-equipment-based model where efficiencies could be enhanced.
The contractor model in the Argentine humid pampas region has existed for over fifty years and has developed into a highly competitive market. Contractors have gained extensive expertise and skill in the management of agricultural machinery and have access to modern advanced technology. When working with them, we seek to develop win-win relationships with our contractors by considering them as part of our production team and providing constant technical training and support through our GTA (as defined below) activities.the activities of the Adecoagro Technical Group (Grupo Técnico Adecoagro) or the “GTA”. We strive to have a number of contractors associated with each farm to generate competition and allow benchmarking to enhance operational efficiency and ensure high-quality service.
In regions where this model is not fully developed, we use a mixed system where we hire the most experienced contractors in the region and we also operate our own machinery. We promote the development of new contractors by providing training and selling them our used machinery. We also promote the movement of selected contractors from developed regions into new marginal regions by offering them an opportunity to grow their businesses. In other regions where there is no established contractor system or there is specific farm work (rice land leveling for instance), we own majority of the machinery. In our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business, we own or lease and operate all the agricultural equipment and machinery needed for sugarcane planting and harvesting operations. Such model is performing very well and is encouraging us to consider it for our Farming businesses.businesses, where we actually have recently incorporated some additional planters and harvesters. Our main goal is to achieve high-quality farm works, both when selecting any contractor and when using our own machinery. In Brazil, we partiallyonly employ the contractor model only for specific tasks, such as land leveling, and aerial spraying, among others.
Adecoagro Technical Group (Grupo Tecnico Adecoagro “GTA”)
The GTA is an internal group formed by agronomists, farm managers, external advisors, contractors, trainees and suppliers, whose main goal is to excel in production management by providing constant technical education and analysis regarding production technologies. Although the GTA is focused on developing such knowledge under common criteria for the whole company, it also considers different production systems, such as crops, rice and dairy in Argentina and Uruguay, and sugarcane in Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. In order toTo achieve theirits goals, the groupGTA meets every 20 days to analyze and discuss technical aspects of the farming production processes.
The GTA participates in the design of the most efficient and productive land use strategies and the definition of the optimal crop production mix for each farm and region, and supervises and evaluates the implementation of the most profitable and sustainable technologies to be adapted and applied in each region. Additionally, the GTA promotes specific external training courses, facilitates participation in external technical groups, organizes technical farm tours, offers support in establishing the crop planting plan and delivers a full-season analysis for each crop annually. This analysis is essential in order to allow technical improvements to be implemented for the following crop season.
Since the GTA is involved in different regions, it plays a relevant role in spreading best practices among productive regions, including “no-till” in lesser-developed areas. In order to evaluate and adapt the proper technologies locally, a vast network of test plots in agrochemicals, seeds, and farm-works are being carried out under specific technical guidelines. Such development is performed to make the necessary technological adjustments in respect of fertilizer levels, the choice of the best product varieties for each crop, the determination of the bestoptimal planting periods, and the improvement in crop management and agricultural mechanization, resulting in higher yields coupled with reduced costs.
In order to continually improve our technical development, we participate in specialized industry groups, such as CREA and AAPRESID in Argentina, with which we share values and goals. “CREA” is a 50-year-old farmers’ association focused on developing and supporting technical excellence with local farmers. “AAPRESID” is a technical association of highly innovative farmers specializing in no-till development. We participate in certain CREA and AAPRESID discussion groups in which we share and evaluate common technical matters. We take advantage of their vast network of test plots and we constantly exchange technological knowledge for implementation in our farms.
In addition, the GTA is focusing its resources on pursuing improvements troughthrough implementing advanced techniques. Such techniques comprise variable inputs usage by type of soil based on precision agriculture technology, intensification techniques relating to soil occupation times and diversified crop rotations, adjusting “no-till” in rice production, developing sugarcane production technologies involving agricultural mechanization and minimum tillage, and developing cotton production technologies involving “no-till” and crop rotation, among others.
By implementing all these education programs and development activities, the GTA provides to the company a network that focuses on the fine-tuning and optimization of the efficiencies throughout all the production processes of each business line.
Technology and Best Practices
We have consistently used innovative production techniques to ensure that we are at the forefront of technological improvements and standards in our industry.industry, especially based on regenerative agriculture concepts. For example, we use the “no-till” technology and “crop rotation”crop rotation to improve our crop yields. We also practice the use of “second harvests”second harvests or double cropping where conditions permit, allowingwhich enables us to plant and harvest a second crop from the same farmland in the same harvest year. Our crop production model is based on balanced fertilization, integrated pest and weed management, and crop intensification. We use the innovative silo bag storage method in our riceRice and cropCrops businesses, allowingwhich enables us to time the entry of our rice production into the market at optimal price points. Additionally, we believe we were the first company in South America to implement the innovative “free-stall”free-stall infrastructure in dairy operations resulting in increased raw milk production compared to
our peers. The free-stall method is a model that provides forenables better control over production variables by confining dairy cows into large barns. Those barns, which are equipped with state-of-the-art technology to enhance
cow-comfort conditions, cow comfort, such as sand beds, water-spraywater spray cooling system and fans. In addition, installations are equipped with indoor corrals and a mechanical advanced milking system on a rotary platform, allowingwhich enables us to utilizeuse production efficiencies and thereby increase milk production volumes while maximizing our land use and resulting in significantly higher conversion rates of animal feed into milk.
OurMoreover, our sugarcane harvesting is 98%99.6% mechanized, which has significantly improved operating efficiency, therefore reducing operating costs. We have modern facilities in the sugar and ethanol business including advanced sugar and ethanol mills with high-pressure boilers, and thatwhich achieve one of the highest ratios of energy produced per ton of cane milled, according to the Cane Technology Center Benchmark program. Our Angélica sugar plant was the first continuously operative facility in Brazil, requiring no production stoppages between sugar batches.
No-Till
“No-till” is the cornerstone of our crop production technology and the key to maintaining and even increasing the value and productivity of our land assets. “No-till” - —often called zero tillage or direct sowing -sowing— is a technology developed more than 3040 years ago to grow crops from year to year without disturbing the soil through tillage, and arose as an opposition to conventional tillage.
Conventional farming consists of using plows to turn and till the soil to remove weeds, mix in soil additives such as fertilizers, and prepare the surface for seeding. Soil tillage leads to unfavorable effects such as soil compaction, loss of organic matter, degradation of soil components, death or disruption of microorganisms, evaporation of soil humidity and soil erosion where topsoil is blown or washed away by wind or rain.
“No-till” farming avoids these negative effects by excluding the use of tillage. The “no-till” technology consists of leaving crop plant residues on the surface of the soil after harvesting a crop. These residues form a mulch or permanent cover protecting the soil from erosion risks caused by heavy rains and strong winds. This protective cover also helps natural precipitation and irrigation water infiltrate the soil effectively while decreasing water loss from evaporation. Absence of tillage helps prevent soil compaction, allowing the soil to absorb more water and roots to grow deeper into the soil. Furthermore, “no-till” reduces the emergence of weeds and enhances biological processes that positively impact soil properties, conserving and even improving the presence of organic matter and microorganisms and associated nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorous, etc)etc.).
The combination of these advantages results in important cost reductions due to a lower use of inputs, mainly diesel, fertilizers and pesticides, and higher crop yields, thus increasing the profitability of our business. These benefits are achieved in the medium to long term, resulting in a continuous increase of land productivity and thus its value. From an operational standpoint, “no-till” facilitates the conditions to perform most of the operations on time such as planting, spraying and harvesting, which enhances the development of large-scale operations and speciallyespecially improves the probability of planting each crop at the optimum moment.
Crop Rotation
Crop rotation is the practice of growing a series of dissimilar types of crops in the same area in sequential seasons. Crop rotation allows us to better control the buildup of harmful weeds and reduces the incidence of plagues and diseases that often occur when the same commodity is continuously cropped. Crop rotation also allows us to balance the fertility demands of various crops to avoid the excessive depletion of soil nutrients, contributing to a more efficient use of fertilizers and a sustainable use of herbicides and pesticides. Crop rotation results in increased yields and reduced production costs, providing a high rate of return. Our crop rotation model is tailored to each of our farming regions based on climatic and soil conditions. For example, in Argentina’s Humid Pampas, our three-year crop rotation cycle involves the planting of a wheat crop followed by a soybean double-crop in the first year, a corn crop in the second year, and a soybean crop in the third year. In some areas of the Humid Pampas, whereArgentine humid pampas with adequate agro-climatic conditions, are adequate, we enhance our crop rotation by introducing some industrial crops such as peanut and confectionary sunflower.
Second Harvest - Double Cropping
Second harvest, also known as “double cropping”,double cropping, is the practice of consecutively producing two crops on the same land within the same growing year. Double cropping is possible only in regions with long growing seasons, which is determined mainly by climate conditions such as rain and temperature. Double cropping allows us to increase the profitability of our land, diversify our production and commercial risk and enhance operational efficiencies through a better utilization of machinery, freight, labor and other resources, resulting in a dilution of our fixed costs. Double cropping has important agronomical advantages as well, such as having crops on the land for a longer period of time, which, enhanced by “no-till” and crop rotation practices, results in the improvement of the physical and chemical properties of the soil in the long term. We implement and
adapt different double cropping systems for each of our productive regions in Argentina and Uruguay, with the most frequent being wheat/soybean, wheat/corn, sunflower/soybean, corn/soybean and sunflower/corn.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Integrated pest management, (“IPM”)or “IPM,” involves a deep analysis of agronomical, economic and environmental aspects with the goal of determining the most efficient way to control the pests. It simultaneously achieves three main goals: (i) enhancing crop productivity, (ii) reducing use of pesticides and (iii) decreasing the risk of agrochemical contamination. The first stage of IPM is to train the people who will be involved in pesticide usage. The pesticide to be applied is selected considering local regulations (only locally approved pesticides are used) and the minimum resulting environmental risks due to its chemical classification. Additionally, when selecting biotechnologically developed crops, we evaluate the potential reduction of pesticide uses that may be achieved. The doses of pesticides are defined by vendor recommendations and adjusted through agronomical expertise (specific to a crop and a pest). We are assessing the environmental impact of such pesticides by implementing the use of the Environmental Impact Quotient developed by Cornell University. The timing of pesticide application is based on economic threshold that takes into account the crop situation (growing stage, climate conditions), the potential damage of the pest (type, population, growing stage), the presence of “beneficial” pests, and finally, the price relationship between grains and pesticides. We also use biological pest controls by breeding and releasing natural enemies of the relevant pest, as is the case with the borer plague in sugarcane. The relevance of the pest is measured by implementing specific scouting methodologies, which are adapted to large-scale farming. Scouting is carried out by trained employees who supervise all the fields on a weekly basis. The pesticide doses are applied by high-tech machinery, the majority of which is outsourced. IPM machinery is accurately calibrated to increase its application efficiency and to reduce any potential contamination risk. Climate conditions are taken into account, as well, in determining the optimal timing for spraying, to avoid drifting, evaporation and leakage risks.
Balanced Fertilization
Balanced fertilization consists of determining an optimum use of fertilizers at the proper grades and in the proper amounts to supply the correct ratio of nutrients and to ensure that the soil will sustain high crop yields over time, consequently decreasing contamination risks. At the beginning of each crop season, we perform extensive soil studies in each of our farms to monitor the amount of organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels in each field. Based on this analysis and considering the potential yield for each field, the crop rotation, and relative prices between fertilizers and agricultural products, we determine the optimum amount of fertilizer to be applied in order to maximize the economic response of the crop.
Water managementManagement
Since crops need sufficient water to achieve their potential yields, we are engaged in techniques aimed to increase the efficiency of water usage and at the same time to decrease soil erosion risks. In that regard, “no-till” presents strong advantages since it improves rainfall infiltration and increases the soil’s water storage capacity. In areas that may be subject to excess water, we are developing terraces, soil leveling and other techniques intended to decrease runoff and erosion risks. In some of the jurisdictions in which we operate, the use of water for irrigation requires obtaining special permits. For certain irrigated crops such as rice, we focus on the design and operation of rainwater harvesting, which is collecting water from rain in semi-natural reservoirs destined for future irrigation. In addition, we have developed a water recycle system for each farm where excess of water (derived from drainage and rainfalls) can be reused, instead of being drained out of the farm. Channels to conduct the water and drain the fields are developed by experts in order to deliver water in the most efficient manner. We are also developing Precision Levelinghave a developed precision leveling system (with zero or controlled grade level) in most of our rice farms to increase productivity and reduce production costs. This technique involves a precise leveling of the land based on GPS and Laserlaser technology. When fields are accurately leveled, water irrigation requirements are reduced, thus lowering the cost of labor and energy. Efficient management of irrigation results in a positive impact on yields.
Additionally, as the fields can be larger, there are some operational benefits that can be achieved by reducing machinery working times. Currently,Recently, we are implementing polypipehave implemented Polypipe irrigation system in some rice-fields.the most mountainous rice fields. This technology consists of deploying plastic pipes to conduct irrigation water from a big channel to the fields, thus reducing water consumption, alongside with a small reduction of area devoted to infrastructure. In addition, we are using drones to assess water levels during rice irrigation season. Through this high-precision surveillance method, we are enhancing water management, which improves potential yield, while reducing water consumption. Drones use different cameras to detect water levels even when dense canopies cover the fields. Other crops, such as corn seed and sunflower seed, are irrigated by highly efficient pivot spraying systems. This type of irrigation system allows us to distribute water uniformly throughout the field, improving the use of water in terms of total millimeters per year. We conduct soil moisture sampling to define the best moment and amount of water to be used for irrigation in each plot.
Mechanization
We incorporate all available mechanization technology into our business that is cost-effective. We believe that by employing mechanization technology we improve our operating efficiency and are better able to reach desired economies of scale in our operations. Mechanization also enables us to adopt new associated technologies faster and hastens our development efforts. In
our farmingFarming business, we are using cutting-edge mechanized technology for planting, spraying, harvesting and irrigating and for soil preparation and management. We also employ advanced mechanization technology in our logistics and product processing operations, including transportation, drying operations and grain sorting and storage. We have developed mechanization technology to benefit sugarcane planting and harvesting, which traditionally have not benefittedbenefited from such mechanization.
Synergies
The technologies we employ are very closely linked, and the joint implementation of a number of them will result in positive synergies for our entire production system. For example, implementation of the “no-till” technology can be enhanced by crop rotations, due to the positive biological effects generated by the different types of roots from each crop in the soil. Benefits of integrated pest management are improved when combined with the “no-till” and crop rotation strategies, since the crop stubble that remains on the soil can be a barrier to some plagues, and because some other pests are specific to a particular crop and the crop rotation can be sufficient to control them. We consider these synergies when we develop our crop seeding schedule. . In the case of re-usethe reuse of residues, we benefited from our experience in sugarcane, where almost everything is re-usedreused and no residues are generated. By transferring such conceptual ideas to our dairy operations, we ended up in reusing the manure from the cows to generate renewable electricity.
AgTechAgtech (Agricultural, digital-basedDigital-Based Technology)
Since inception, we have been introducing cutting-edge technologies to increase our production efficiency. As digital and information-based technologies are rapidly advancing, we are currently devoting time and effortseffort to work closely with AgTech Startupsagtech startups that could bring solutions to our operational processes. We are monitoring both local and international startups, with the goal of adopting efficient digital technology in our operations (see “Research & Developments” section).operations.
Industrial Technology
In recent years, we have incorporated several industrial facilities to our portfolio and have been actively enhancing their performance using technology. In our dairy industry, we replaced LPG gas with natural gas as a source of energy in the facility of Morteros, thereby reducing both the cost of production and the environmental impact. At Morteros, we also incorporated the technology to produce fat filled, a product that helps us enhance our operational efficiency while achieving new markets. At the Chivilcoy facility, have incorporated technologies to produce and package UHT cream, yogurt and milk with cacao. These advances help us enhance our milk-based product portfolio. All these new products are based on our own formula and are developed by our production and quality team.
Information Technology
We employ the World Class ERP Oracle eBusiness Suite ERP to standardize and integrate our processes throughout the company and improve controls and information accuracy and consolidation. The Oracle eBusiness Suite allows us to fulfill our local accounting and fiscal needs while facilitating operational coordination across our geographic areas and lines of business, reducing our operational costs and minimizing duplication and inefficiencies. It also provides our management with consolidated results in a timely manner.
Cyber securityCybersecurity
In accordance with the growing risks in cybersecurity like viruses, trojans,Trojans, hackers and other threats, we have adopted a series of measures designed to mitigate these risks. We are constantly implementing new technologies and solutions to assist in the prevention of potential and attempted cyber-attacks,cyberattacks, as well as protective measures and contingency plans in the event of an existing attack. We analyze the risks we face on an ongoing basis and, accordingly, strengthen our information technology infrastructure, update our policies, and raise awareness among our employees, to enhance our ability to prevent and respond to such risks.
Despite our security measures, in January 2020 we suffered an infection incident with a virus. This incident compromised the networks, and a significant number of servers and personal computers of Adecoagro. However, it did not have a material impact on our information technology, since the production systems were not compromised, nor were the financial and accounting systems or the company's databases. Adecoagro was forced to carry out a contingency plan, in order to restore the affected services, and return to a safe and normalized working condition. Services were recovered during the days following the incident, but critical systems such as billing, sales and merchandise dispatches were available within a few hours after the event. In response to this event, we have taken several actions. For example, weWe have created the Cyber Security Officer position; wea cybersecurity officer position and have hired a cyber-securitycybersecurity specialist to help us in the validation and development of a short, midour short-, mid- and long term plan; and we have already increasedlong-term plan. This has allowed us to steadily increase the security level inat our facilities. This event has enforcedfacilities, as part of our commitment and decision to continue reinforcing our security systems, and to keep improvingimprove our contingency plans.
Environmental Aspects
We are implementing a production model that reflects a strong commitment to the environment. Our responsibility to the environment begins with complying with local regulations. In order to beTo become better stewards of the environment, we are implementing
environmental management plans for our operations. Those plans involve different stages, which include educating our own and outsourced staff, monitoring ecological parameters, preventing negative effects, and correcting deviations. Natural resources such as land, water, air and biodiversity are taken into account when we evaluate both the development of a new production project and the operation of an on-going one.new and ongoing production projects and operations. In that regard, we are constantly evaluating best practices to be implemented in our operations. See “-Technology“—Technology and Best Practices.” With land being one of the most relevant natural resource in our operations, we have developed a sustainable land use strategy that considers factors beyond the requirements of local lawlaws and regulations. There are ecosystems that we do not consider appropriate for agricultural development, such as heavy forests and key wetlands. We evaluate development of other areas (savannahs,(e.g. savannahs, natural grasses, bush land, lowlands) only after carrying out an environmental impact assessment. In addition to such evaluations, we analyze the agricultural potential of the land in respect of the soil, the climate, crop productivity and available technology, among other factors. Through this approach, we make sure that we grow the most suitable crop in each region with the aim of being the lowest costlowest-cost producer of the sector. We then consolidate our analysis into a land transformation plan, which includes the best land use option and implements best practices based on regenerative agriculture such as the “no-till” technology, crop rotations, integrated pest and weed management, balanced fertilization, responsible pesticide usage and water management. AllIn addition, in 2021, we planted 55,000 hectares of cover crops. These help prevent water and wind erosion, function as biological fallows, reduce the need to apply phytosanitary products and provide roots that increase soil porosity. We sow these crops and adapt the species to the agro-ecological environmental condition.
These best practices aim to increase resource efficiency and to decrease the risk of contamination and waste production and are consolidated into an environmental management plan, which includes biodiversity management when applicable. We aim to properly implement our sustainable production model to enhance land productivity and therefore increase land value. With respect to pesticide contamination risks, we are implementing a responsible pesticide use program, which includes personnel training, personnel protection elements, application recommendations, pesticide selection criteria, pesticide handling and storage and after-use pesticide packages management (which are specifically cleaned, collected and stored for recycling purposes under third parties’third-party programs). In 2021, we began to implement the "Environmental Impact Quotient" indicator, which allows us to assess the potential risk of the applications of phytosanitary products and the impact caused by them. Further, in 2021, we increased to 23,500 hectares the area where we use selective spray equipment to reduce the doses of phytosanitary products using a machine to detect weeds, which allows us to apply the product only where necessary. In addition, periodically train our personnel on our rice fields to raise awareness about the responsible use of phytosanitary products.
Additionally, in some regions where biodiversity matters are relevant, we are implementing biodiversity management plans, which mainly consists of the GTA periodically monitoring flora and fauna, detecting significant variations of their populations, and proposing measures to reduce any potential threats to local species. As a result, we are implementing some practices such as prohibiting hunting on our farms and developing environmental private protection areas (where natural vegetation is protected by implementing sustainable production practices). As environmental matters require specific expertise and an understanding of complex relationships, we hire highly qualified consultants, , and are entering into cooperative arrangements and agreements with educational institutions.
In Brazil, we have the Brazilian Forestry Code (Código Florestal Brasileiro) as the main source for our environmental policies. Accordingly, we analyze and identify all natural areas inside our own farms and inside leased areas, and make a development plan that defines actions for their preservation. Some examples of these activities are the reforestation of Permanent Preservation Areas (Áreas de PreservaciónPreservação Permanente) and Legal Reserve Areas (Áreas de Reserva Legal),. Along with natural regeneration techniques, we have produced seedlings of more than 70 native species to reforest those areas. We are strongly committed to the preservation of forests, and we only develop areas for farming if they were previously used for agricultural purposes or for pasture. We do not operate in massive forests, large wetlands or areas with high biodiversity value. We concern ourselves with the protection of riverbanks and surrounding areas of streams and springs, as they are important for soil conservation and as refuges for native fauna. In that regard, we are implementing periodic monitoring of wildlife and native flora as well.
In respect ofto our industrial processing activities, we focus on energy-efficient processes that increasesincrease productivity with minimum waste disposal. At the same time, we constantlyseek to promote the re-usereuse of any by-product or residue within the industrial processes when feasible, or in the fields when theirthe economic analysis make sense.is sensible. A successful example of this approach is the use of manure to produce electricity and the use of bio fertilizersbiofertilizers to grow crops in our Dairy Farm.dairy farms. Another successfulsuccess story is the use of all Sugarsugar and Ethanolethanol industrial by-products (vinasse, filter cake and composted ashes) as bio fertilizersbiofertilizers in our cane fields.
Since November 2017, we are producing renewable electricity from our bio-digesterbiodigester built in our Dairy Farm.dairy farm. The bio-digesterbiodigester transforms cow manure into biogas with high methane content, which then fuels a cogeneration facility that generates 1.4 MW of Power.electricity. The electricity produced is sold to the grid under a long-term contract with an Argentinean Argentine
federal utility. Additionally, as this project allows us to reduce GHGgreenhouse gas emissions, we have registered the project under the VCS (VerifiedVerified Carbon Standard)Standard to deliver carbon credits from the bio-digester.biodigester. In 2011, we received a grant from the Sustainable Energy and Climate Change Initiative fromof the Inter-American Development Bank, (SECCI)or the “SECCI,” in order to carry out the pre-feasibility assessment. We have also received a grant from the “AgenciaAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnologica”,Tecnologica, an agency whichthat promotes technological innovation, to partially fund the investment. In July 2016, we participated ofin Argentina’s “RenovAr” renewable energy auction and entered into a 20-year contract to supply up to 9,145 MWh per year at an average price of US$158.92 per MWh plus bonifications. In 2021, our biodigester generated a record 10,907 MWh of renewable electricity (a 32% increase compared to 2020).
At the UMA mill, we have implemented a pilot plant that produces biogas from vinasse, developed in partnership with Efficiencia, a subsidiary of Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (“CEMIG”).— CEMIG. The technology developed during this project will allow us to generate additional energy from vinasse while maintaining the fertilizer recycling potential ofat UMA. We are currently replicatinghave replicated this project under a Commercialat commercial scale in our Cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul (Brazil).cluster. Currently, we are producing renewable electricity with it and have begun to evaluate the potential of biomethane as a portable fuel for trucks, lorries and cars. We continue to fine-tune our production process to enhance efficiency, and once the technology begins to work accordingly, we may expand the capacity to maximize the production of biogas in this cluster. These emission reduction projects couldwill also improve our efficiency by decreasing the carbon emission. In 2021, we certified our biogas facility as the first renewable gas plant in Brazil, which allows us to issue and sell carbon credits (gas-recs)..
Since 2020, we have issued CBios under the RenovaBio program, the first company in Brazil to do so in the local markets. In 2021, we sold more than 500,000 CBios. The better environmental performance of our operations, the greater the number of CBios we could use, which motivates us to enhance such performance year by year.
Social Programs
Apart fromIn addition to complying with local labor regulations, we seek to promote the personal and professional development of our employees by offering them an adequate working environment with proper health and safety protections. We aim to develop a transparent relationship with local authorities. Finally, one of our main goals is to contribute positively to the social development of the communities in which we operate, creating new jobs, preserving the environment, providing training opportunities through our internship program and assisting with social development. In order to implement our social development programs, we analyze the areas in which we operate and give special attention to education and poverty rates, possible alliances with other social actors, and potential synergies with local government programs. In addition to social development programs, we contribute to community organizations in each area where we operate, such as hospitals, schools, daycare centers and fire stations, among others. We also have a voluntary matching program where Adecoagro matches each donation from our employees at a 2:1 ratio.
Education
Our sugarcane and rice operations have a very important economic impact in the communities where we are located, and we have developed a Social Action Program in the various municipalities. In 2005, we started a partnership with Cimientos in Corrientes, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero and Entre Rios in Argentina, through which we have awarded 68 educational programs in 204 urban and rural schools located close to our rice operations. These programs benefit 30,528 students.Argentina. Cimientos is a non-profit organization that promotes equal educational opportunities for children and youth from low-income families in Argentina. In 2021, we participated in the Cimientos Escuelas que Acompañan program. The program consisted of trainings and workshops for teachers and headmasters of 18 secondary schools from Corrientes and Santa Fe, focusing on the development of socio-emotional skills. In 2016 we had started another program together with Conciencia (a local NGO)non-governmental organization) in which we support our employees’ children to complete their education. This new program beganIn 2021, we had 26 students in Salta near to Los Guayacanes,secondary school and 16 children participated. In 2017 we extended the program to the City ofhigher education from San Salvador where 18 children participated(Entre Ríos) and between the two establishments we reached a total of 28 childrenLas Lajitas (Salta) participating in the program.
In 2019 we made a new alliance with the Reciduca Foundation with the aim of providing 10 school scholarships (10) for young people from the community of Pilar to finish their secondary studies, expand their employment opportunities and promote environmental care. We supported the program all these years, and the positive results for 2021 motivated our decision of increasing the number of scholarships to 15 in 2022.
Additionally, we have partnered with Fundação Bradesco in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, working with the local municipalities of Angélica and Ivinhema to re-trainretrain teachers at their schools, aiming to improve the performance of public schools to a level of regional excellence. We also have partnerships to encourage the habit of reading through the training of teachers of municipal schools as storytellers and investment in libraries.
Nutrition
In Argentina, we work in partnership with the Conin Foundation, which fights malnourishment in children, focusing its actions in three main aspects: education, assistance and research. In 2019,2021, we donated nearly 55165 tons of powderedrice and milk. We also work in partnership with the Argentine Food Bank Network, to whom we are currently donating approximately 3040 tons of processed rice.food. This network operates in 17 citiesis supported by 18 food banks and is a nonprofit distribution enterprise that serves the community by acquiring donated food and making it available to people who are hungryin need through a network of community agencies. These agencies include school feeding programs, food pantries, soup kitchens, hospices, substance abuse clinics, after-school programs and other nonprofit organizations. In 2021, we also contributed with the Argentine Food Bank Network with a significant monetary donation for the construction of its new logistic and distribution center in Buenos Aires. Additionally, we have been contributing food to Solidagro, (5.6 tons), an alliance between rural corporate institutions and civic organizations that seek to solve famine and malnutrition problems, since 2007. We are also collaborating with selected soup kitchen initiatives such as Caritas, ChristophersenConin centers, schools and San Gregorio Foundation.other organizations. In 2021, we reached about 60 organizations with our food donations.
Additionally,We are committed as well with the Haciendo Camino non-governmental organization in 2019its fight against malnourishment in children in Santiago del Estero. We have been supporting the organization for the last years, and in 2021 we agreed on a new campaign together with a basketball clubcovered 70% of the annual budget of the Early Childhood Center in the province of Corrientes, Argentina. The campaign was called “Festejá cada punto vale triple” (Celebrate, each point is worth triple). With this campaign for each point the basketball team scores during this season, Adecoagro will donate 3 kilos of rice to the Conin Foundation centers located within the province of Corrientes. In December 2019, we provided 15 tons of rice to these centers.
Los Juries.
In Brazil, we support several local schools, kindergartens, homes for the elderly and APAEs, (localwhich are local associations to support seriously deficient in the community)persons with disabilities, with financial investment and training to improve social management. Because of these initiatives, the ABRINQ Foundation as Child Friendly Company certified theour Monte Alegre unit.unit as a child-friendly company.
Internship Program
The purpose of our internship program is to promote the development of highly qualified professionals forfrom the community by providing first-time work experience, good quality training and access to highly technology-oriented operations. We seek to
facilitate interns’ future access to the job market while detecting potential key employees. The interns actively participate in the TAG training program, which includes monthly technical meetings, external training and farm tours. In order to accomplish these goals we promote institutional relationships with local and international universities and high schools. Over 331411 interns have participated in our program during the last 15 years, of which 94118 were subsequently incorporated into our teams.
Material Agreements
For a description of the material agreements relating to our indebtedness, please see “Item 5.-Operating5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-B.Prospects-— B. Liquidity and Capital Resources-IndebtednessResources—Indebtedness and Financial Instruments.”
Argentina
Consignment Contract with Establecimiento Las Marías
Our subsidiary, Pilaga S.A. entered into a consignment contract dated February 19, 2000, with Establecimiento Las Marias S.A.C.I.F.A. pursuant to which Las Marias was granted exclusive license to sell the products or imports of Pilagá S.A. in Argentina. For its services, Las Marias collects a commission of 9.56%, calculated over the gross amounts of the sales made by Las Marias on behalf of Pilagá S.A., net of commercial discounts, before VAT and any other applicable tax that is applied in any invoicing. This Agreement was mutually terminated on July 11, 2019 with effects as of December 31, 2019.
Brazil
Sugar Sale AgreementAgreements
In 2019,2021, our largest three customers in this segment comprised approximately 60%93% of our sugar sales agreements. Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. (via Adecoagro Uruguay S.A.) entered into sugar sales agreements with companies as Louis Dreyfus Commodities, Suisse S.A, Viterra B.V. (formerly known as Glencore Agriculture B.V.) and Engelhart Commodities Trading Partners (formerly known as BTG Pactual Commodities) and Alvean Sugar S.L., pursuant to which Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. agreed to supply approximately 100,000476,000 metric tons of Brazilian VHP (very high polarization). This specific amount of sugar was delivered during 2019the 2021 harvest year in Paranaguá port, and the price was fixed in reference to the ICE Sugar N°no 11 Futures.
Electric Energy Agreements
Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. entered into an agreement for the sale of energy to CCEE. This agreement is a result of a public auction by the Brazilian federal government conducted in AugustMay 2008, carries a term of 15 years, and requires Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. to supply CCEE with 87,600 MWh annually during the harvest periods each year (April to December), at a rate of R$157.15/312.46/MWh. The price of energy under the contract is adjusted annually according to inflation.
In August 2010, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. participated in a public auction by the Brazilian federal government. As a result of this auction, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. entered into second 15-year agreement with CCEE starting in 2011, for the sale of 131,400 MWh per year at a rate of R$154.25/278.80/MWh.
Intellectual Property
As of March 2019,April 2021, our corporate group owned 4039 trademarks registered with the Argentine National Intellectual Property Institute and had 612 trademarks in the process of registration. Also, Adeco Brasil and UMA owned 17 trademarks
registered with the Brazilian National Industrial Property Institute (“INPI”), and had submitted 10 trademark registration requests, all of which are currently being challenged by third parties or were initially denied by INPI. In addition, Adeco Agropecuaria Brasil S.A. had submitted one trademark for registration. Agroglobal S.A. (now Adecoagro Uruguay S.A.) has one trademark registered in Uruguay.
In Argentina, we are required to renew our trademark registrations when they expire at the end of their respective terms. Under the Argentine Trade and Service Marks Law No. 22,362, the term of duration of a registered trademark is 10 years from its issue date, and a trademark may be indefinitely renewed for equal periods thereafter if, within the five-year period prior to each expiration, the trademark was used in the marketing of a product, in the rendering of a service or as the designation of an activity.
In Brazil, title to a trademark is acquired only once its valid registration has been issued by the INPI. During the registration process, the person requesting the trademark merely has an expectation of the right to use the trademark to identify its products or services. Under Law No. 9,279, of May 14, 1996 (the Brazilian Industrial Property Law), the holder of a trademark has the right to its exclusive use throughout Brazil. The term of duration of a registered trademark is 10 years from its issue date, and a trademark may be indefinitely renewed for equal periods thereafter. Within a five-year period from the issue date, the owner has an obligation to use the trademark in the marketing of a product, in the rendering of a service or as the designation of an activity.
If the owner does not use the trademark within such five-year period, it may be subject to a forfeiture process, upon request of any third party with legitimate interest in the trademark. The same forfeiture process may occur if the owner fails to use the trademark for any five-year period, continuously. If the trademark is declared forfeited, the trademark rights are terminated.
Insurance
The type and level of insurance coverage we obtain is determined based on consultation with leading insurance brokers. We carry policies with leading U.S., European, and local insurance companies, and we are currently insured against a variety of risks, including losses and damages relating to our plants, equipment and buildings. We believe our level of insurance coverage is customary and appropriate for a company of our size and with respect to our activities. Our insurance currently covers only part of the losses we may incur and does not cover losses on crops due to hail storms, fires or similar risks.
Legal and Administrative Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to certain contingent liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings, including those involving tax, social security, labor lawsuits and other matters. We accrue liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. See “Item 8. Financial Information-A.Information —A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information-LegalInformation—Legal and Administrative Proceedings.”
Environmental Regulations and Compliance
Our businesses in the various emerging market countries in which we operate are subject to comprehensive national, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the preservation and protection of the environment to which those businesses must adhere. These laws and regulations require some of our businesses to obtain permits or licenses that have to be renewed periodically in order to allow us to continue to operate. If such permits or licenses lapse or are not renewed or if we fail to obtain any required environmental licenses and permits, or if we do not comply with any other requirements or obligations established under the applicable environmental laws and regulations, we may be subject to fines or criminal sanctions and might faceenvironmental liability at administrative level (fines, partial or total suspension of our operations and suspension or cancellation of our environmental licenses and permits.), criminal and/or civil level (recovery of any damage caused). In addition, our businesses which hold debt from banks, and multilateral lenders in particular, are typically required to adhere to environmental standards that exceed those of the country in which the business operates (e.g.(e.g., World Bank standards).
We are currently either in compliance with or are in the process of applying for permits that would put us in compliance with all applicable environmental laws and environmental licenses and permits. Specifically, the operational license of UMA is valid, having been issued on September 5, 2016, and is valid for 8eight years. On June 10, 2014, we applied for the renewal of the operational license for the Angélica mill, which havehas been issued on March 29, 2019, authorizing to mill up to 6.5 million tons of sugarcane per year, valid until March 28, 2023. On April 24, 2015, we obtained an installation license (licenç(licença de instalação)o) for the Ivinhema mill authorizing herits installation. On July 23, 2015, we obtained the operational license (licenç(licença de operação)o) from IMASUL authorizing us to mill up to 5five million tons of sugarcane per year. Currently, the operationalThe current operating license (licenç(licença de operação) of the Ivinhema mill is been renewed. The request was filedissued on March 20, 2019,July 27, 2021, and on December 03, 2019, we obtained an environmental declaration (declaração ambiental)is valid for 12 monthssix years, authorizing the grindingus to mill up to 7.2 million tons.tons of sugarcane per year. In addition to the installation and operational license, the Ivinhema mill also obtained
other permits including licenses for water capture and gas station operation, among others. Failure to obtain the necessary environmental licenses may prevent us from operating the Ivinhema mill or may subject us to sanctions.
Our operating businesses have the required environmental monitoring, equipment and procedures, and we utilize third-party contractors to conduct regular environmental audits. Our environmental expenses relate to consultants we use to perform environmental impact studies for our development projects and control and monitoring procedures. However, as environmental regulations are expected to become more stringent in some of the countries where we operate, our environmental compliance costs are likely to increase due to the cost of compliance with any future environmental regulations. While we are not aware of any material environmental liabilities related to our ongoing operations, we may be subject to cleanup costs, which we do not expect to be material.
Regulation and Control of Agri-Food Production in Argentina
The National Office of Agricultural Commerce Control (Oficina Nacional de Control Comercial Agropecuario, or “ONCCA”) created on November 27, 1996, as a decentralized entity of the Ministry of Agriculture was the agency responsible for controlling the commercialization and manufacturing of agricultural livestock, meat and dairy products in Argentina.
As of February 25, 2011 the ONCCA was dissolved pursuant to Decree No. 192/2011. The faculties previously held by the ONCCA have been transferred to the Ministry of Agriculture and to an entity (Unidad(Unidad de Coordinación y Evaluación de Subsidios al Consumo Interno or “UCESCI”,“UCESCI,” after its acronym in Spanish) created by means of Decree No. 193/2011. Such entity was then dissolved by means of Decree No. 444/2017, which provided that the powers granted to the former UCESCI will be carried out by the Ministry of Agriculture. As a result, the Ministry of Agriculture is the enforcement authority of the decrees issued by the ONCCA and is in charge of monitoring the agricultural compliance with the commercialization regulations. The Ministry Agriculture will be responsible for the administration, allocation and payment of subsidies for wheat, corn and soybean, and will be in charge of the registry for the export of cattle.
Under applicable regulations, all persons involved in the commercialization and manufacturing of grains and dairy products must be registered with the Registry of Operators of the Agro-industrial Chain (Registro(Registro Único de Operadores de la Cadena Agroindustrial or “RUCA” after its acronym in Spanish), which provides for registration of any individual or company involved in the trade and industrialization of agri-food products in the markets for grains, livestock and dairy products and their by-products and/or derivatives, in the terms provided by Resolution No. 302/2012, as amended, issued by the Ministry of Agriculture. ThisAccording to annex I of Resolution No. 21/2017, this registration must be renewedhas no expiry date, as long as the conditions and requirements established for its granting and validity are maintained by the operator and the operators complies with each year.and every one of the obligations imposed by the in force and future regulations. Grain producers must stock grains at facilities and must keep a record of the grain stock stored at such facilities. Failure to register with the RUCA, or cancellation of such registration, will lead to requirements that the operator cease its operating activities and closure its facilities.
On February 26, 2014 the AFIP issued Resolution No. 3,593/14, which came into force on April 1, 2014, and established a Systematic Registration of Movements and Grains Stocks Regime (Ré(Régimen de Registración Sistemática de Movimientos y Existencias de Granos)Granos) by which all persons involved in the commercialization and manufacturing of grains and dairy products registered with the RUCA must report the stock and stock variations (including locations, transport between the producer’s facilities, etc.) of all grains other agricultural products (other than those to be applied to sowing) held in their own or other third party’s name.
In the event of a violation of any of the applicable regulations, sanctions may be imposed, including fines and suspension or cancellation of the registration, which would result in the immediate cessation of activities and closure of facilities.
On April 15, 2021, the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries issued Resolution No. 60/2021, published in the Official Gazette on April 19, 2021, which specifies that dairy and grain exporters that did not register an establishment of its own in the RUCA must provide additional information. Pursuant to Decree No. 131/2022, the Argentine government, as a temporary and transitory measure, suspended export duty rates provided in Decree No. 790/2020, until and including December 31, 2022, for the products of the tariff positions of the “Common Nomenclature of Mercosur,” included therein and the export rates set out in Decree No, 230/2020 shall apply. In addition, the Argentine government issued Decree No. 132/2022,ordering the creation of the Public Trust Fund called Argentine Grain Stabilization Fund to guarantee a separate trust fund that will contribute to mitigate the increase in the price per ton of grain bought by Argentine windmills as a result of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Finally, the Argentine Secretariat of Domestic Trade is currently working on a new bill to create a so-called National Food Company, which would intervene in the production, fabrication, distribution, commercialization, and industrialization of food products.
Recent Developments
COVID-19
The COVID-19 virus continues to pose a risk that Adecoagro or its employees, contractors, suppliers, customers and other business partners may be prevented from conducting certain business activities for a period of time, including due to shutdowns mandated by governmental authorities or otherwise adopted by companies as a preventive measure.
Both in Argentine and Brazil, governments adopted social distancing measures and shutdowns that affected economic activities. As of the date of this report, most of those restrictions have been lifted. As a result, we continue to operate normally.
Notwithstanding, we are closely monitoring this situation and taking all necessary measures to preserve our safety and operations. For example, we continue to enact prevention and action protocols tailored for each facility and activity. We also have crises committees that monitor our response to the pandemic. Other measures we have taken include: (i) body temperature controls at entrances of each facility and other critical check points, (ii) mandatory distancing in the workplace, (iii) maximum limit of people in the conference rooms, lunch rooms and vehicles, (iv) sanitary barriers, (v) special protective attire and masks, (vi) mandatory quarantines for those who have been in contact with travelers or with symptomatic persons, (vii) training programs and information about how to prevent the risks of transmission of COVID-19, and (viii) hiring of an infectious disease specialist to further on-site assessment. Additionally, remote work has been guaranteed for the duration of the pandemic for employees based in central offices, and a rotation scheme has been implemented for administrative employees based in the farms or industrial facilities.
Conflict between Russia and Ukraine
We have been following the developments of the outbreak of the conflict in Russia and Ukraine and invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022. Despite that neither nor customers nor providers reside in such countries, we estimate that the prices of some agricultural inputs necessary for our activity, such as fertilizers and fuel, will be increase due to the impact of such conflict on the global economy. Even before the conflict began, we had anticipated the rising of fertilizer prices, and purchased fertilizers in order to guarantee our supply of such product and mitigate the impact of such price increases during our current harvest period. However, the potential increase of fuel prices and logistical costs resulting from the conflict may have an impact on our business.
State Value-Added Tax
In March 2022 the National Congress of Brazil approved a Supplementary Law changing the method for collecting the State Value-Added Tax (“ICMS”) over fuel, including anhydrous ethanol, as well as temporarily reducing the rates of Social Contribution on Gross Revenues (“PIS” and “COFINS”) to zero until December 2022 for diesel oil. PIS and COFINS normally represent approximately R$0.33 per liter of fuel. As a result, in principle, this measure may result in the reduction of the cost for acquiring diesel fuel. In relation to anhydrous ethanol, State regulation remains to be enacted.
C.ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Corporate Structure
We are a corporation organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg under the form of a société anonyme.anonyme. As of April 20, 2020,27, 2021, we held approximately 100% of the interests in Adecoagro LP S.C.S., a société en commandite simple organized under Luxemburg law with a de minimis remaining interest owned by Adecoagro GP S.à r.l, a société à responsibilitiéresponsibilité limitée organized under Luxemburg law and our substantially wholly-owned subsidiary. Adecoagro LP S.C.S. is a holding company with operating subsidiaries owning farmland and facilities throughout Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. For a diagram of our Organizational structure as of April 20, 2018, please see “Item 4. Information on the Company – Company—A. History and Development of the Company – Company—History.”
As of April 20, 202027, 2021 our principal shareholders were Al Gharrafa Investment Company, Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn, Route One Investment Co LP, EMS Capital LP and Brandes Investment Partners LP. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders.”
D.PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT
See “B. Business Overview—Land Transformation—Our Farms”; “—Property, Plant and Equipment.”
Item 4B.4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F discusses the Company’s operating and financial review and prospects as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. For a discussion of the Company’s operating and financial review and prospects as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, see "Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and prospects—A. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—Results of Operations—Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019,” —B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” and "—Cash Flows—Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2020 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020” included in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the SEC on April 28, 2021 are incorporated herein by reference.
Overview
We are engaged in agricultural, manufacturing and land transformation activities. Our agricultural activities consist of harvesting certain agricultural products, including crops (soybeans, corn, wheat, etc.), rough rice, and sugarcane, for sale to third parties and for internal use as inputs in our various manufacturing processes, and producing fluid milk. Our manufacturing activities consist of (i) selling manufactured products, including processed rice, sugar, ethanol and energy, among others, (ii) since ArilApril 2019, in our acquired milk facilities we produce UHT and UP milk, powder milk and semi-hard cheese, among others; and (iii) providing services, such as grain warehousing and conditioning and handling and drying services, among others. Our land transformation activities consist of the acquisition of farmlands or businesses with underdeveloped or underutilized agricultural land and implementing production technology and agricultural best practices to enhance yields and increase the value of the land. Please seeSee also "“Item“Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors —Risks Related to Argentina- Argentine law concerning foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina" and "“Item"Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors —Risks Related to Brazil- Recent changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments."
We are organized into three main lines of business: farming; land transformation;Farming; Land Transformation; and sugar, ethanolSugar, Ethanol and energy.Energy. These lines of business consist of six reportable operating segments, which are evaluated by the chief operating decision-maker based upon their economic characteristics, the nature of the products they offer, their production processes and their type and class of customers and distribution methods. Our farmingFarming business is comprised of four reportable operating segments: Crops, Rice, Dairy, and All Other Segments. Each of our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy and Land Transformation lines of business is also a reportable operating segment. Please see – See “—Operating Segments” for a discussion of our six operating reportable segments.
There are significant economic differences between our agricultural and manufacturing activities. Some ofIn addition to our agricultural activities, generallywe perform manufacturing activities in the Crops (including peanut and sunflower products), Dairy, Rice and Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segments. Our other agricultural activities including those within Crops and All Other Segments do not involve further manufacturing processes, including those within the crops, dairy and All Other Segments. Our other agricultural activities in the rice and sugar, ethanol and energy segments generally involve further manufacturing processes, comprising our manufacturing activities.processes. The table below sets forth our agricultural and manufacturing activities by segment.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Segment | | Agricultural Product | | Manufactured Product and Services Rendered |
| Crops | | Soybean, Corn, Wheat, Sunflower and Peanuts among others | | Grain drying and conditioning |
| | | | |
SegmentRice | | Agricultural Product | | Manufactured Product and Services Rendered |
Crops | | Soybtean, Corn, Wheat, Sunflower and Peanuts among others | | Grain drying and conditioning |
| | | | |
Rice | | Rough rice | | White rice and brown rice |
| | | | |
| Dairy | | Fluid milk | | UHT and UP milk, powder milk and semi-hard cheese, among others |
| | | | |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Sugarcane | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |
Manufacturing Activities
The gross profit of our manufacturing activities is a function of our sales of manufactured products and services rendered and the related costs of manufacturing those products or delivering those services. We recognize an amount of revenue representing the actual dollar amount collected or to be collected from our customers. Our principal costs consist of raw materials, labor and social security expenses, maintenance and repairs, depreciation, lubricants and other fuels, among others. We obtain our raw materials principally from our own agricultural activities and, to a lesser extent, from third parties.
Agricultural Activities
Our agricultural activities involve the management of the biological transformation of biological assets into agricultural produce for sale to third parties, or into agricultural products that we use in our manufacturing activities. We measure our biological assets and agricultural produce in accordance with lASIAS 41 "Agriculture." lASIAS 41 requires biological assets to be measured on initial recognition and at each balance sheet date at their fair value less cost to sell, with changes in fair value recognized in the statement of income as they occur. As market prices are generally not available for biological assets while they are growing, we use the present value of expected net cash flows as a valuation technique to determine fair value, as further discussed below in "-Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates." lnNote 32 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, agricultural produce at the point of harvest is measured at fair value less cost to sell, which is generally determined by reference to the quoted market price in the relevant market. Consequently, the gains and losses arising on initial recognition and changes in fair value of our biological assets and the initial recognition of our agricultural
produce at the point of harvest are accounted for in the statement of income in the line item "lnitial"Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce."
After agricultural produce is harvested, we may hold it in inventory at net realizable value up to the point of sale, which includes market selling price less direct selling expenses, with changes in net realizable value recognized in the statement of income when they occur. When we sell our inventory, we sell at the prevailing market price and we incur direct selling expenses.
We generally recognize the agricultural produce held in inventory at net realizable value with changes recognized in the statement of income as they occur. Therefore, changes in net realizable value represent the difference in value from the last measurement through the date of sale on an aggregated basis.
We consider gains and losses recorded in the line items of the statement of income "lnitial"Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce" and "Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest" to be realized only when the related produce or manufactured product is sold to third parties and, therefore, converted into cash or other financial assets. Therefore, "realized" gains or losses mean that the related produce or product has been sold and the proceeds are included in revenues for the year. Please see “–Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce” forSee Note 32 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.for a discussion of the accounting treatment, financial statement, presentation and disclosure related to our agricultural activities.
Land Transformation
The Land Transformation segment includes two types of operations. The first relates to the acquisition of farmlands or businesses with underdeveloped or underutilized agricultural land (land which we have identified as capable of being transformed into more productive farmland by enhancing yields and increasing its future value). When we acquire a farmland business for an acquisition price below its estimated fair value, we recognize an immediate gain (a "purchase bargain gain"). The land acquired is recognized at its fair value at the acquisition date and is subsequently recorded under the revaluation model based on periodic, but at least annual, valuations prepared by an external independent expert.
The second type of operation undertaken within this segment relates to the realization of value through the strategic disposition of assets (i.e.,farmland) that may have reached full development potential. Once we believe certain land has reached full growth potential, we may decide to realize such incremental value through the disposition of the land.
The results of these two activities (purchase bargain gains as a result of opportunistic acquisitions of businesses with underdeveloped or underutilized land below fair market value, and gains on dispositions reflecting the ultimate realization of cash value on dispositions of transformed farmlands) are included separately in the Land Transformation segment.
Land transformation activities themselves are not reflected in this segment; rather, they are reflected in all of our other agricultural activities in other segments. The results of our land transformation strategy are realized as a separate activity upon disposition of transformed farmlands and other rural properties.
A. OPERATING RESULTS
Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
COVID-19
In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus known as COVID-19 (“COVID-19”)or "COVID-19,” was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China and was declared a worldwide pandemicstarted spreading to the World Health Organization on March 11,rest of the world in early 2020. The speedCOVID-19 virus has impacted economic activity worldwide and extenthas posed the risk that Adecoagro or its employees, contractors, suppliers, customers and other business partners may be prevented from conducting certain business activities for an indefinite period of time, including due to shutdowns mandated by governmental authorities or otherwise adopted by companies as a preventive measure.
Both in Argentina and Brazil, governments adopted social distancing measures, and shutdowns, that affected economic activities. In our case, activities pursued by our Argentine subsidiaries, related to agricultural production, distribution and commercialization, were exempted from the Mandatory Isolation Regime for being considered “essential” activities. Also our activities in Brazil are currently subject to no COVID-19 related restrictions. Thus, the activity of the spreadCompany has not suffered any severe effects. As of the date of this report, following widespread vaccination, almost all such restrictions were lifted.
The Company is closely monitoring the situation and taking all necessary measures at its disposal to preserve human life and its operation.
The Company has enacted prevention and action protocols tailored for each facility and activity, in addition to constituting crisis committees to monitor the Company’s response to the pandemic.
Measures taken include but are not limited to: (i) body temperature controls at entrances of each facility and other critical check points, (ii) mandatory distancing in the workplace, (iii) maximum limit of people in the conferences rooms, lunch room and vehicles (iv) sanitary barriers, (v) special protective attire and masks, (vi) mandatory quarantines for those who have been in contact with travelers or with symptomatic persons, (vii) training programs and information about how to prevent the risks of transmission of COVID-19, and(viii) hired an infectious disease specialist to further assess on site. Additionally, remote work has been guaranteed for the duration of the pandemic for employees based in central offices, and intensity of resulting business disruptiona rotation scheme has been implemented for administrative employees based in the farms or industrial facilities.
Nonetheless, we are closely monitoring the situation and related financialtaking all necessary measures at our disposal to preserve human life and social impact, are uncertain, and such adverse effects may be material. The Company could be negatively affected if personnel including management and personnel at its operations are quarantined as the result of, or in order to avoid, exposure to a contagious illness. In addition, the Chinese market is a significant source of global demand for the commodities we sell and it may have a significant effect on commodity prices and demand and potentially broader impacts on our supply chain or the global economy, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial position. While governmental agencies and private sector participants will seek to mitigate the adverse effects of this coronavirus, which may include such measures as heightened sanitary practices, telecommuting, quarantine, curtailment or cessation of travel, and other restrictions, and the medical community is seeking to develop vaccines and other treatment options, the efficacy of such measures is uncertain. We are not now able to determine fully the extent to which COVID-19 will impact our business activity or financial results, which will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted fully.operation.
Please refer to Item 4 - Information about the Company - Business Overview - COVID 19, for additionalFor more information, concerning the COVID 19 pandemic. See alsosee “Item 3. Key Information-D.Information—D. Risk Factors —Factors—Risks relatedRelated to Argentina —The measures taken or to be implemented by the Argentine government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our businessOur Business and operations.” and “WeIndustries—We may be exposed us to risks related to health epidemics, and the COVID-19 in particular, that could adversely impact our ability to operate our business and results of operations.” and “The measures taken or to be implemented by the Brazilian government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause adverse effect on our business and operations.” And ‘Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are also closely correlated to the price of oil, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline in the price of oil will adversely affect our sugar and ethanol businesses".
Description of recent changes to our accounting policies
2019:
Leases
As stated in Note 35.1 to our consolidated financial statements. the adoption of IFRS 16 - Leases is mandatory commencing on January 1st, 2019. We disclose in Note 35.1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements the new accounting policies that have been applied from January 1, 2019, where they are different from those applied in prior periods.
IFRS 16 was adopted following the simplified approach, without restating comparative figures. The reclassifications and the adjustments arising from the new lease accounting rules are directly recognized in the opening balance sheet on January 1, 2019. Regarding the recognition of the expense, since 2019 the expense is recognized as depreciation of right of use, while previously it was recognized within the line lease expenses and similar arrangements. There are no significant differences in the statement of income among both treatments.
Following the adoption of IFRS 16, the Company recognized lease liabilities in relation to leases which had previously been classified as ‘operating leases’ under the principles of IAS 17 Leases in addition to lease liabilities in respect of leases classified as “Finance leases” as further described below. In the previous years, the Company only recognized lease liabilities in relation to leases that were classified as "Finance leases" under IAS 17 Leases. For the initial recognition, the liabilities that were recognized in respect of all these leases were measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate as of January 1, 2019. There were no material differences observed in the statement of income following adoption of the standard, which now requires that the previously recognized lease expense or other similar arrangement be recognized as Depreciation of right of use.
According with the adoption of IFRS 16, the new accounting policy for leases is as follows:
Leases are recognized as a right-of-use asset and corresponding liability at the date of which the leased asset is available for use by the group is recognized. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and the associated finance cost. The finance cost is charged to profit or loss over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the
liability for each period. The right-of-use asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life and the lease term on a straight-line basis.
In determining the lease term, the Company considers all facts and circumstances that create an economic incentive to exercise an extension option, or to not exercise a termination option. Extension options (or periods after termination options) are only included in the lease term if the lease is reasonably certain to be extended (or not terminated)operations".
Short term leases are recognized on a straight line basis as an expense in the income statement.
2018:
Revaluation Model for farmlands (IAS 16/IAS40)
Since September 2018, the Company changed the accounting policy for its farmlands, adopting a new revaluation model (See "Item 3. Key Information-A. Selected Financial Data") For all farmlands with a total valuation of US$ 710 million and US$ 785 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, the valuation is determined using a sales comparison approach prepared by an independent expert. Sale prices of comparable properties are adjusted considering the specific aspects of each property, with price per hectare as the more important criterion. The Company estimated that, other factors being equal, a 10% reduction on the sales price for the period ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 would have reduced the value of the farmlands by US$ 71 million and US$ 78.5 million. This would generate a negative effect on the "Revaluation surplus" item in the statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity.
Also, since September 2018, the Company changed the accounting policy for all investment properties, adopting a new revaluation model (See Item 3. Key Information-A. Selected Financial Data). For all investment properties with a total valuation of US$ 34.1 million and US$ 40.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, the valuation was determined using sales comparison approach prepared by an independent expert. Sale prices of comparable properties are adjusted considering the specific aspects of each property, with price per hectare as the more important criterion. The increase or decrease in the fair value is recognized in the statement of income under the line item "Other Operating Income, Net". The Company estimated that, other factors being equal, a 10% reduction on the sales price for the period ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 would have reduced the value of the investment properties on US$ 3.4 million and US$ 4.1 million, respectively, which would impact the line item "Net gain from fair value adjustment".
(i) Hyperinflation in Argentina (IAS 29 / IAS 21)
Effectively from July 1, 2018, the Group applied IAS 29 “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies” (“IAS 29”) to its operations in Argentina. IAS 29 “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies” requires that financial statements of entities whose functional currency is that of a hyperinflationary economy must be adjusted for the effects of changes in the general price index and expressed in terms of the current unit of measurement at the closing date of the reporting period (“inflation accounting”). (See note 35 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). In order to determine whether an economy is categorized as hyperinflationary under the terms of IAS 29, the standard details a series of factors to be considered, including the existence of a cumulative inflation rate in three years that approximates or exceeds 100%.We will to continue to apply IAS 29 until such time as the cumulative three-year inflation rate is equal to or less than 70%. Argentina experienced a significant increase in inflation during 2018, which exceeded the 100% three-year cumulative inflation rate. During 2019, the three-year cumulative inflation rate exceeded the threshold of 70%, and as a result we continue applying inflation accounting. formation-A. Selected Financial Data).
The application of IAS 29 affects only Argentine operations, which represents 27% of our profit from operations.
IAS 29 requires adjustments to non-monetary items in the statement of financial position by applying a general price index from the day they were booked to the end of the reporting period. At the same time, it also requires that all items in the statement of income are expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period. Consequently, each reporting period on a monthly basis results of operation measured in Argentine Pesos is adjusted for inflation by the applicable monthly inflation rate each month.
After the restatement process, Paragraph 42 of IAS 21 “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”, addresses the way results must be translated under inflation accounting, stating that “…all amounts shall be translated at the closing rate at the date of the most recent statement of financial position… .” Accordingly, monthlyOur results of operations in Argentine Pesos, after adjustment for inflation pursuanthave been influenced and will continue to IAS 29, as described above, must thenalso be converted into U.S. dollars at the closing exchange rate for such monthly reported period This process is called “translation”. This conversion changes every prior reported monthly statement of income in U.S. dollars as each monthly amount is readjusted under IAS 29 for inflation per above and reconverted at different exchange rates for each monthly reported period under IAS 21. As a result, the impact of monthly inflationary adjustments and monthly conversion adjustments vary the results of operation month to month until year end.
The Company prepares monthly financial reports, issues unaudited quarterly financial statements and uses the U.S. dollar as its reporting currency in all reports. Applying both IAS 29 and IAS 21 as described above, the monthly and quarterly results change every period as a consequence of the above mentioned re-measurement and translation processes. This variation is further exacerbatedinfluenced by the fact that most of the sales in the crops segment are recorded during the first-half of the year due to the seasonality of the operations in Argentina. As a result of the foregoing factors, the Company’s management evaluates the financial results monthly using the monthly average U.S. dollar exchange rate and with respect to the presentation of segment information, amounts are translated on a monthly basis. For this reason, the financial information presented in the Segment information footnote includes results of operations that are based on monthly data and which have been adjusted for inflation and converted into the average exchange rate of the U.S. dollar each month. These figures are not subsequently readjusted and reconverted as described above under IAS 29 and IAS 21. It should be noted that this translation methodology for evaluating segment information is the same method as the one used by the Company to translate results of operation from its other subsidiaries from other countries that have not been designated hyperinflationary economies because it allows for a more accurate analysis of the economic performance of its business as a whole.following factors:
Consequently, the difference between re-measurement and translation information and the information management evaluates is reconciled by the combined effect of the application of both processes.
(ii) Effects of Yield Fluctuations
The occurrence of severe adverse weather conditions, especially droughts, hail, floods or frost, are unpredictable and may have a potentially devastating impact on agricultural production and may otherwise adversely affect the supply and prices of the agricultural commodities that we sell and use in our business. The effects of severe adverse weather conditions may also reduce yields at our farms (i.e during April and November 2019 we suffered of drought in Mato Grosso do Sul, which had a major impact in sugarcane yields decrease for the year, causing a negative impact in the line item profit from operations of about $49.5 millions in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment).farms. Yields may also be affected by plague, disease or weed infection and operational problems.
The following table sets forth our average crop, rice and sugarcane yields per hectare for the periods indicated:
| | | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 | | % Change | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 | | % Change |
| | Harvest Year (1) | | Harvest Year (1) | | Harvest Year (1) | | 2018/2019 -2017/2018 | | 2017/2018 -2016/2017 | | Harvest
Year (1) | | Harvest
Year (1) | | Harvest
Year (1) | | 2020/2021 -2019/2020 | | 2019/2020 -2018/2019 |
| Corn (2) | 6.5 |
| | 4.9 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 32.7 | % | | (18.3 | )% | Corn (2) | 5.7 | | | 6.0 | | | 6.5 | | | (5.0) | % | | (7.7) | % |
| Soybean | 3.2 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 28.0 | % | | (10.7 | )% | Soybean | 2.5 | | | 2.5 | | | 2.6 | | | — | % | | (3.8) | % |
| Soybean (second harvest) | 1.4 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 16.7 | % | | (52.0 | )% | |
| | Wheat (3) | 2.9 |
| | 2.2 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 31.8 | % | | (26.7 | )% | Wheat (3) | 2.8 | | | 3.2 | | | 2.9 | | | (12.5) | % | | 10.3 | % |
| Peanut | 3.1 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 47.6 | % | | (22.2 | )% | Peanut | 3.0 | | | 3.3 | | | 3.1 | | | (9.1) | % | | 6.5 | % |
| Sunflower | 1.6 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 1.9 |
| | (11.1 | )% | | (5.3 | )% | Sunflower | 1.8 | | | 1.9 | | | 1.6 | | | (5.3) | % | | 18.8 | % |
| Rice | 5.9 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 5.9 |
| | (14.5 | )% | | 16.9 | % | Rice | 7.8 | | | 6.7 | | | 5.9 | | | 16.4 | % | | 13.6 | % |
| Sugarcane (4) | 75.6 |
| | 89.3 |
| | 85.1 |
| | (15.3 | )% | | 4.9 | % | Sugarcane (4) | 68.6 | | | 79.0 | | | 75.6 | | | (13.2) | % | | 4.5 | % |
(1) This column reflects the full harvest season.
(2) Includes sorghum and chia.
(3) Includes barley, rye, oats, chickpea and chickpea.black pea.
(4) Does not consider harvested area for planting activities.
(iii) Effects of Fluctuations in Production Costs
We experience fluctuations in our production costs due to the fluctuation in the costs of (i) fertilizers, (ii) agrochemicals, (iii) seeds, (iv) fuel, (v) farm leases and (vi) labor. The use of advanced technology, however, allows us to increase our efficiency, in large part mitigating the fluctuations in production costs. Some examples of how the implementation of production technology has allowed us to increase our efficiency and reduce our costs include the use of no-till technology (also known as “direct sowing”,sowing,” which involves farming without the use of tillage, leaving plant residues on the soil to form a protective cover which positively impacts costs, yields and the soil), crop rotation, second harvest in one year, integrated pest management, and balanced fertilization techniques to increase the productive efficiency in our farmland. Increased mechanization of harvesting and planting operations in our sugarcane plantations and utilization of modern, high pressurehigh-pressure boilers in our sugar and ethanol mills has also yielded higher rates of energy production per ton of sugarcane milled.
(iv) Effects of Fluctuations in Commodities Prices
Commodity prices have historically experienced substantial fluctuation. For example, between January 1 2019,2021 and December 31, 2019,2021, sugar prices increased by 11.6%22%, according to Intercontinental Exchange of New York (“ICE-NY”) data, and ethanol prices increased by 20.9%63%, according to Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” (“ESALQ”) data. Also, based on Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) data, from January 1, 20192021, and December 31, 2019,2021, soybean prices increased 6.9%1% and corn prices increased by 3.4%22.6%. Commodity price fluctuations impact our consolidated statement of income as follows:
Initial•initial recognition and changes in the fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in respect of unharvested biological assets undergoing biological transformation;transformation.
Changes•changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce for inventory carried at its net realizable value; and
Sales•sales of manufactured products and agricultural produce to third parties.
The rapid and widening spread of the COVID-19 is impacting the price of the products we sell (i.e sugar, ethanol, corn, powder milk among others) due to the lower demand and economic activity worldwide. As an example, during the month of March 2020, sugar prices decreased by 26% according to ICE-NY, ethanol prices decreased 10% according to ESALQ and corn prices decreased by 9.1% based on CBOT. Given the uncertainty around the extent and timing of the COVID-19 spread we cannot predict or asses the final outbreak of this pandemic, nor any other pandemic impacting our business.
The following graphs show the spot market price of some of our main products forbetween December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2021, highlighting the periods indicated:period from January 1 to December 31, 2021:
(1) Source: CBOT
(2) Source: ICE-NY
(3) Source: ESALQ
Fiscal Year and Harvest Year
Our fiscal year begins on January 1 and ends on December 31 of each year. However, our production is based on the harvest year for each of our crops and rice. A harvest year varies according to the crop or rice plant and to the climate in which it is grown. Due to the geographic diversity of our farms, the planting period for a given crop or rice may start earlier on one farm than on another,
causing differences for their respective harvesting periods. The presentation of production volume (tons) and production area (hectares) in this report in respect of the harvest years for each of our crops and rice starts with the first day of the planting period at the first farm to start planting in that harvest year to the last day of the harvesting period of the crop or rice planting on the last farm to finish harvesting that harvest year.
On the other hand, production volumes for dairy and production volume and production area for sugar, ethanol and energy business are presented on a fiscal year basis.
The financial results in respect of all of our products are presented on a fiscal year basis.
(vi) Effects of Fluctuations of the Production Area
Our results of operations also depend on the size of the production area. The size of our own and leased area devoted to crop, rice and sugarcane production fluctuates from period to period in connection with the purchase and development of new farmland, the sale of developed farmland, the lease of new farmland and the termination of existing farmland lease agreements. Lease agreements are usually settled following the harvest season, from July to September for crops and rice, and from May to April for sugarcane. The length of the lease agreements areis usually one year for crops, one to five years for rice and five to six years for one-cycle sugarcane or twelve to fourteen years for two-cycle of sugarcane. Regarding crops, the production area can be planted and harvested one or two times per year. As an example, wheat can be planted in July and harvested in December. Right
after its harvest, soybean can be planted in the same area and harvested in April. As a result, planted and harvested areaareas can exceed themaximize their production area during onein any given year. The production area for sugarcane can exceed the harvested area in one year. Grown sugarcane can be left in the fields and then harvested the following year.
The following table sets forth the production area for the periods indicated:
| | | | Year ended December 31, | | | | | | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Chg (%) 2019-2018 | | Chg (%) 2018-2017 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | Chg (%) 2021-2020 | | Chg (%) 2020-2019 |
| | | | Hectares | | | |
| | | | | | Hectares | | | | |
Crops (1) | 152,976 |
| | 153,970 |
| | 145,410 |
| | (0.6 | )% | | 5.9 | % | Crops (1) | 215,494 | | | 161,706 | | | 152,976 | | | 33,3% | | 5.7 | % |
| Rice | 40,417 |
| | 40,289 |
| | 39,728 |
| | 0.3 | % | | 1.4 | % | Rice | 49,040 | | | 41,544 | | | 40,417 | | | 18.0 | % | | 2.8 | % |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | 166,041 |
| | 153,690 |
| | 143,617 |
| | 8.0 | % | | 7.0 | % | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | 185,806 | | | 176,651 | | | 166,041 | | | 5,2% | | 6.4 | % |
(1) Does not include second crop and forage area.
The increase in sugar, ethanol and energy production area in 20192021 is explained by an increase in leased hectares that provide sufficient cane supply for the entire year in accordance with the long-term growth plan of the company. The increase in crops production area in 2021 compared to 2020 was mainly driven by the increase in leased area. The increase in Rice production area is mainly related to business development.
(vii) Effect of Acquisitions, dispositionsDispositions and landLand transformation
Our business model includes the transformation of pasture and unproductive land into land suitable for growing various crops and the transformation of inefficient farms into farms suitable for more efficient uses through the implementation of advanced and sustainable agricultural practices, such as "no-till" technology and crop rotation. During approximately the first three to five years of the land transformation process of any given parcel, we must invest heavily in transforming the land, and, accordingly, crop yields during such period tend to be lower than crop yields once the land is completely transformed. After the transformation process has been completed, the land requires less investment, and crop yields gradually increase. As a result, there may be variations in our results from one season to the next according to the amount of land in the process of transformation.
Our business model also includes the identification, acquisition, development and selective disposition of farmlands or other rural properties that after implementing agricultural best practices and increasing crop yields, we believe have the potential to appreciate in terms of their market value. As a part of this strategy, we purchase and sell farms and other rural properties from time to time. Please see also “Risktime, subject to the restrictions described in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Argentina-Argentine law concerningthe Countries in Which We Operate—Laws on the foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Brazil—Changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.properties.” included in “Item 3. Risk Factors”.
The results included in the Land Transformation segment are related to the acquisition and disposition of farmland businesses and not to the physical transformation of the land. The decision to acquire and/or dispose of a farmland business depends on several market factors that vary from period to period, rendering the results of these activities in one financial period when an acquisition of disposition occurs not directly comparable to the results in other financial periods when no acquisitions or dispositions occurred.
Our results of operations for earlier periods that do not include a recently completed acquisition or do include farming operations subsequently disposed of may not be comparable to the results of a more recent period that reflects the results of such acquisition or disposition. During 2019 we sold one farm in Brazil, "Alto Alegre", for a total consideration of $16.8 million for 6,080 hectares.
(viii) Macroeconomic Developments in Emerging Markets
We generate nearly all of our revenue from the production of food and renewable energy in emerging markets. Therefore, our operating results and financial condition are directly impacted by macroeconomic and fiscal developments, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates, inflation and interest rate fluctuations, in those markets. The emerging markets where we conduct our business (including Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay) remain subject to such fluctuations. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Countries in Which We Operate—Our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon economic conditions in the emerging countries in which we operate” and “—Economic and political conditions in the countries in which we operate, and the perception of these conditions in international markets, may adversely impact our business, our access to the capital and debt markets, our results of operations and financial condition.”
Please referMoreover, economic conditions of the countries in which we operate may be impacted by inflation over domestic prices, which may result in higher costs and affect our revenues. High inflation rates may undermine the conditions that allow us to Item 4 - grow in those countries and induce to macroeconomic volatility, affecting overall competitiveness, increasing social and economic inequality, reducing employment, consumption and the level of economic activity and undermining confidence in banking system, which could further limit domestic and international credit availability. In 2021, inflation in local currency in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay has been 50.2%, 10.2% and 7.96%, respectively. We present our result from operations adjusted by the effect of hyperinflation accounting policies and translation for our Argentine operations according to IAS 29 (See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Financial reporting in a hyperinflation economy). For further detail on the impact of inflation, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Countries in Which We Operate—Inflation in some of the countries in
which we operate, along with governmental measures to curb inflation, may have a significant negative effect on the economies of those countries and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations.”
In addition, government policies enacted in the countries where we operate or factors may have a material impact, or could materially affect, the Company’s operations. See also “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risk related to Our Business and Industries—Governmental policies reducing the amount of ethanol required to be added to gasoline, or eliminating tax incentives for flex-fuel vehicles, may adversely affect our business” and “—Our business is subject to significant governmental regulation, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.” See “Item 4—Information about the Company -Company—B. Business Overview - COVID 19,Overview—Recent Developments,” for additional information concerning the COVID 19 pandemic. See also "“Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors — Risk related to Argenitna — The measures taken or to be implemented by the Argentine government in response tomacroeconomic events, including the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operations.” and “We may be exposed us to risks related to health epidemics, and the COVID-19 in particular, that could adversely impact our ability to operate our business and results of operations.” and “The measures taken or to be implemented by the Brazilian government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause adverse effect on our business and operations.”pandemic.
(ix) Effects of Export Taxes on Our Products
Following the economic and financial crisis experienced by Argentina in 2002, the Argentine government increased export taxes on agricultural products. Since December 2015, the only product that had remained subject to export taxes was soybean and its derivatives. However, in September 2018 due to economic volatility, the government imposed a 12% export tax on all goods exported from Argentina. A 12% export tax was imposed on the FOB export price of “primary product” goods (including agricultural goods), subject to a cap of four pesos (ARS 4) per U.S. dollar of the corresponding tax value or official FOB price for primary product goods. For all other products, the cap amount was fixed at three pesos (ARS 3) per U.S. dollar of the corresponding tax value or official FOB price. In December 2019, after a change in Argentinathe Argentine government administration, export taxes were adjusted as per the following table:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Product | Export tax | Cap per dollar exported |
| Soybean and derivatives | 33% | — |
|
| Corn | 12% | — |
|
| Wheat | 12% | — |
|
| Peanut | 7% | — |
|
| Sunflower | 5% | — |
|
| Cotton | 5% | — |
|
| Rice | 5% | — |
|
| UHT Milk | 12% | $3/usd |
Ps. $3/U.S. dollar |
| Powder Milk | 9% | — |
|
| Cheese | 12% | $3/usd |
Ps. $3/U.S. dollar |
As local prices are determined taking into consideration the export parity reference, any increase or decrease in export taxes would affect our financial results.results of operations.
(x) Effects of Foreign Currency Fluctuations
Each of our Argentine, Brazilian and Uruguayan subsidiaries usesuse local currency as its functional currency. A significant portion of our operating costs in Argentina are denominated in Argentine Pesos and most of our operating costs in Brazil are denominated in Brazilian Reais.reais. For each of our subsidiaries’ statements of income, foreign currency transactions are translated into theto local currency, as such subsidiaries’ functional currency, using the exchange rates prevailing as of the dates of the relevant specific transactions. Exchange differences resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the statement of income under “finance income” or “finance costs,” as applicable. Our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars, and foreign exchange differences that arise in the translation process are disclosed in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Peso-U.S. dollar exchange rate was Ars. 59.89Ps. 102.7 per U.S. dollar as compared to Ars. 37.7Ps. 84.1 per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2018.2020. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Real-U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$4.025.6 per U.S. dollar as compared to R$3.875.2 per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2018.2020.
The following graph shows the Argentine Peso-U.S. dollar rate and the Real-U.S.real-U.S. dollar rate of exchange for the periods indicated:between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2021, and in particular between January 1 and December 31, 2021:
(1) Source: Bloomberg
Our principal foreign currency fluctuation risk involves changes in the value of the Brazilian Reais and the Argentine Peso relative to the U.S. dollar. Periodically, we evaluate our exposure and consider opportunities to mitigate the effects of currency fluctuations by entering into currency forward contracts and other hedging instruments.
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Brazilian real depreciated 11.3% against the US Dollar, and we cannot predict the future effects on Exchange rates. Please refer to Item 4 - Information about the Company - Business Overview - COVID 19, for additional information concerning the COVID 19 pandemic. See also “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors — Risk related to Argentina —We may be exposed us to risks related to health epidemics, and the COVID-19 in particular, that could adversely impact our ability to operate our business and results of operations ".
(xi) Seasonality
Our business activities are inherently seasonal. We generally harvest and sell corn, soybean, rice and sunflower between February and August, and wheat from December to January. With the implementation of “continuous harvest”,the "continuous harvest method,” sugarcane production is more stable during the year; however, the typical harvesting period in Brazil begins between April and May and ends between November and December. Sales of ethanol are generally concentrated during off-season to capture higher seasonal prices. Sales in other business segments, such as in our Dairy segment, tend to be more stable. However, milk sales are generally higher during the fourth quarter, when weather conditions are more favorable for production. As a result of the above factors, there may be significant variations in our results of operations from one quarter to another, since planting activities may be more concentrated in one quarter whereas harvesting activities may be more concentrated in another quarter. In addition, our quarterly results may vary as a result of the effects of fluctuations in commodity prices and production yields and costs related to the “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” line item. See “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates-Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce.”Note 32 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
(xii) Capital Expenditures and Other Investments
Capital expenditures totaled US$205.2 million, US$166.8 million and US$257.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Our capital expenditures during the last three years consisted mainly of expenses related to (i) transforming and increasing the productivity of our land, (ii) planting sugarcane and (iii) expanding and upgrading our production facilities in concordance to our 5-year plan presented in 2017.facilities. Capital expenditures (including both maintenance and expansion) totaled $199.6US$205.2 million forin the periodyear ended December 31, 2017, $220.42021, in comparison to US$166.8 million forin the periodyear ended December 31, 2018; and $257.0 million for the period ended December 31, 2019. The increase in 2019 compared to 2018 is primarily due to: (a) the purchase of milk processing facilities of Morteros and Chivilcoy; (b) investments related to the increase in nominal crushing capacity and hectares planted to supply the growing industrial capacity; (c) the construction of our fourth free stall with a capacity for 3,500 milking cows. See also “Capital Expenditure Commitments.”2020.
For 2020, the Company is revising most of its planned capital expenditures due to macroeconomic volatility generated by COVID-19 pandemic. Please refer to Item 4 - Information about the Company - Business Overview - COVID 19, for additional information concerning the COVID 19 pandemic. See also Item 3 - Risk Factors - “The measures taken or to be implemented by the Argentine government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operations.” and “We may be exposed us to risks related to health epidemics, and the COVID-19 in particular, that could adversely impact our ability to operate our business and results of operations.” and “The measures taken or to be implemented by the Brazilian government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may cause adverse effect on our business and operations.” And ‘Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are also closely correlated to the price of oil, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline in the price of oil will adversely affect our sugar and ethanol businesses".
(xiii) Effects of Corporate Taxes on Our Income
We are subject to a variety of taxes on our results of operations. The following table shows the applicable income tax rates in effect for 2019:
|
| |
| Tax Rate (%) |
Argentina(1)
| 30 |
Brazil(2)
| 34 |
Uruguay | 25 |
Spain | 25 |
Luxembourg | 24.94 |
| |
(1) | During 2017, the Argentine Goverment introduced changes in the income tax. The increase in the volume of milk sold is mainly explained by an increase of 18.5% of fluid milk production in our own free-stalls, due to a 19.6% |
| |
(2) | The income tax rate will be reduced to 30% for the years 2018 to 2020, and to 25% from 2021 onwards. A new tax on dividends is created with a rate of 7% for the years 2018 to 2020, and 13% from 2021 onwards. |
| |
(3) | Including the Social Contribution on Net Profit (CSLL). |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with IFRS. The critical accounting policies are policies important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and operating results, and which require management to make difficult and subjective judgments that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, we have identified the following significant accounting policies as critical to the understanding of our Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. The principal area where our management is required to make significant judgments about estimates where actual results could differ materially from such estimates is in the carrying amount of our biological assets. These estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We believe that the estimates and judgments upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates and judgments are made. We continually evaluate our judgments, estimates and assumptions. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our Consolidated Financial Statements will be affected.
The Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates are consistent with those described in Note 34 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce
Before harvest, our crops are biological assets. Subsequent to harvest, biological transformation ceases and the harvested crops meet the definition of agricultural produce under IAS 41 “Biological Assets.” As prescribed by IAS 41, we measure growing crops which have not attained significant biological growth at cost less any impairment losses, which approximates fair value. Capitalized expenses for growing crops include land preparation expenses and other direct production expenses incurred during the sowing period including costs of labor, fuel, seeds, agrochemical and fertilizer, among others. We measure biological assets (at initial recognition, when the biological asset has attained significant biological growth, and at each subsequent measurement reporting date) and agricultural produce at the point of harvest at fair value less selling costs. The objective of the fair value model under IAS 41 is to recognize gains and losses arising from such measurements gradually over the asset’s life rather than only on sale or realization. IAS 41 prescribes, among other things, the accounting treatment for biological assets during the period of growth, degeneration, production and procreation, and for the initial measurement of agricultural produce at the point of harvest.
We account for agricultural produce after harvest as inventory, as further described below.
The following table sets forth the way in which we value biological assets and agricultural produce for each of our principal products:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Biological Asset | | | | Tax Rate (%) |
| No significant
biological growthArgentina (1)
| | Significant
biological growth
| | Agricultural Produce | | Manufactured Product35 |
| Brazil | | | | | | | 34 |
CropsUruguay | Crop from planting to approximately 60 days thereafter | | Crop, from approximately 60 days after planting up to the moment of harvest (total period of approximately 3 to 5 months). | | Harvested crop (soybean, corn, wheat, peanut, sunflower, etc.) | | Processed peanut and sunflower25 |
| Spain | | | | | | | 25 |
RiceLuxembourg | Rice plant from planting to approximately 60 days thereafter | | Rice plant, from approximately 60 days after planting up to the moment of harvest (total period of approximately 3 to 4 months). | | Harvested rough rice | | Processed rice (white rice) and rice snacks |
| | | | | | | |
Dairy | Dairy cow is considered a biological asset from birth/purchase to death or sale. | | Fluid milk | | Processed milk (UHT milk, Powder milk, Cheese) |
| | | | | |
Cattle | Beef cattle are considered a biological asset from birth/purchase to death or sale. | | N/A | | N/A |
| | | | | |
Sugar, ethanol and energy | The produce derived from the sugarcane from planting or after harvest up to approximately 30 days thereafter | | The produce derived from the sugarcane, from approximately 30 days after planting until harvest (total period of 10 to 14 months) | | Sugarcane | | Sugar, ethanol and energy |
| | | | | | | |
Valuation Criteria | Cost, which approximates fair value less accumulated impairment losses, if any. For dairy and cattle, fair value less estimated cost to sell. | | Fair value (using discounted cash flow valuation) less cost to sell. | | Net realizable value, except for rough rice and milk which are valued at cost. | | Cost24.94 |
Gains and losses that arise from measuring biological assets at fair value less selling costs and measuring agricultural produce at(1)Includes the point of harvest at fair value less selling costs are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they arise as “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce.” We value our inventories of agricultural produce after harvest at net realizable value, except for rough rice, which is valued at cost.Social Contribution on Net Profit (Contribuição Social Sobre o Lucro Líquido).
When an active market exists for biological assets, we use the quoted market price in the most relevant market as a basis to determine the fair value of our biological assets, as in the case of cattle. For other biological assets where there is neither an active market nor market-determined prices during the growth cycle, we determine their fair value through the use of discounted cash flow valuation techniques. Therefore, we generally derive the fair value of our growing biological assets from the expected cash flow of the related agricultural produce. The discounted cash flow method requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including observable and unobservable data. Generally, the estimation of the fair value of biological assets is based on models or inputs that are not observable in the market, and the use of unobservable inputs is significant to the overall valuation of the assets. Various factors influence the availability of observable inputs, including, but not limited to, the type of asset and its location, climate changes and the technology used, among others.
Unobservable inputs are determined based on the best information available, for example, by reference to historical information regarding past practices and results, statistical and agronomical information and other analytical techniques. Changes in the assumptions underlying such subjective inputs can materially affect the fair value estimate and impact our results of operations and financial condition from period to period.
The DCF method requires the following significant inputs to project revenues and costs:
| |
– | Production area in hectares; |
| |
– | Estimated crop and rice yields; |
| |
– | Estimated sucrose content (Total Recoverable Sugar or TRS) for sugarcane; |
| |
– | Estimated costs of harvesting and other costs to be incurred until the crops and rice reach maturity (mainly costs of pesticides, herbicides and spraying); |
| |
– | Estimated transportation costs; |
In contrast to biological assets whose fair value is generally determined using the DCF method, we typically determine the fair value of our agricultural produce at the point of harvest using market prices.
Market prices used in the discounted cash flow model are determined by reference to observable data in the relevant market (e.g., for crops and sugar). Harvesting costs and other costs are estimated based on historical and statistical data. Yields are estimated by our agronomic engineers based on several factors, including the location of the farmland, soil type, environmental conditions, infrastructure and other restrictions and growth at the time of measurement. Yields are subject to a high degree of uncertainty and may be affected by several factors out of our control, including but not limited to extreme or unusual weather conditions, plagues and other diseases. Discount rates reflect current market assessments of the assets involved and the time value of money.
As of December 31, 2019, the impact of a 5% increase (decrease) in estimated yields, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our plantations less cost to sell of $7.1 million (for 2018 the fair value was $6.3 million) for sugarcane. As of December 31, 2019, the impact of a 20% increase (decrease) in estimated yields, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our plantations less cost to sell of $3.8 million (for 2018 this fair value was $4.3 million) for crops and $6.2 million (2018: $8.9 million) for rice.
The significant assumptions discussed above are highly sensitive. Reasonable shifts in assumptions including but not limited to increases or decreases in prices, costs and discount factors used would result in a significant increase or decrease to the fair value of biological assets. In addition, cash flows are projected over a number of years and based on estimated production. Estimates of production in themselves are dependent on various assumptions, in addition to those described above, including but not limited to several factors such as location, environmental conditions and other restrictions. Changes in these estimates could materially impact on estimated production, and could therefore affect estimates of future cash flows used in the assessment of fair value , including the potential impacts of the COVID 19 on commodity prices used in the cash flow model.
The valuation models and their assumptions are reviewed annually, or quarterly if warranted, and, if necessary, adjusted. Since the years ended December 31, 2016 we made no changes to the models.
The aggregate gains and losses arising during a period on initial recognition and from the changes in fair value less costs to sell of biological assets is affected by the way we treat our harvesting and production costs for accounting purposes. Since IAS 41 does not provide guidance on the treatment of these costs, we generally capitalize all costs directly involved with the management of biological assets. These costs may include labor, planting, fertilizers, agrochemicals, harvesting, irrigation and feeding, among others. Then, the cost of the biological asset is adjusted periodically by the re-measurement of the biological asset at fair value less cost to sell. For example, before significant biological growth is attained, costs and expenses are capitalized as biological assets, and once biological assets reach significant biological growth we adjust biological assets to fair value less cost to sell. Accordingly, capitalized biological assets are adjusted periodically at fair value less cost to sell. At the point of harvest, we recognize the agricultural produce at fair value less cost to sell. The periodic adjustments in fair value less cost to sell reflect period to period gains or losses. After agricultural produce is harvested, we may hold it in inventory at net realizable value up to the point of sale, which includes market selling price less direct selling expenses, with changes in net realizable value recognized in the statement of income as incurred. When we sell our inventory, we sell at the prevailing market price and we incur direct selling expenses.
We generally recognize the agricultural produce of crops held in inventory at net realizable value with changes recognized in the statement of income as they occur. Therefore, changes in net realizable value represent the difference in value from the last measurement through the date of sale on an aggregated basis.
We consider gains and losses recorded in the line items of the statement of income “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest” to be realized only when the related produce or manufactured product is sold to third parties and, therefore, converted into cash or other financial assets. Therefore, “realized” gains or losses means that the related produce or product has been sold and the proceeds are included in revenues for the year.
The sale of agricultural produce is revenue as defined in IFRS 15. However, IAS 41 does not provide guidance on the presentation of revenues and costs arising from the selling of biological assets and agricultural produce. Due to the lack of guidance in IAS 41 and based on IAS 1, “Presentation of financial statements,” we present, as a matter of accounting policy, our sales of biological assets and agricultural produce and their respective costs within the lines items “Sales of goods and services rendered” and “Cost of goods and services rendered.” See "Notes 4 and 5" to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of sales and costs for goods sold and services rendered. The sale of agricultural produce and biological assets represents the consideration received or receivable for the sale to third parties based generally on the applicable quoted market prices of the respective produce or biological asset in the relevant markets at the point of sale. At the point of sale, our agricultural produce is measured at net realizable value, which reflects the sale price less the direct cost to sell, and our biological assets are measured at fair value less cost to sell, in each case, using the applicable quoted market prices in the relevant markets.
Based on the foregoing, the profit of our agricultural produce is recognized under the line ítems “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest.” When the agricultural produce is sold to third parties we do not record any additional profit as the gain or loss had already been recognized.
The profit of our manufactured products is recognized when they are sold. The cost of manufactured products includes, among others, the cost of agricultural produce transferred internally at fair market value (i.e. harvested sugarcane, rough rice, fluid milk, etc).
Fair Value of Farmlands and investment property
Property, plant and equipment
Farmlands are recognized at fair value based on periodic, but at least annual, valuations prepared by an external independent expert. A revaluation reserve is credited in shareholders’ equity. The valuation is determined using sales Comparison Approach. Sale prices of comparable properties are adjusted considering the specific aspects of each property, the most relevant premise being the price per hectare (See "Note 35.1 to our consolidated financial statements").
Investment property
Investment property consists of farmland for rental or for capital appreciation and not used in production or for sale in the ordinary course of business, and it is measured at fair value. The changes of the Fair value, which is based on an independent external expert, impacts the profit and loss of the period, in the line item Other operating income, net (See "Note 14 and Note 35.1 to our consolidated financial statements)."
Impairment of non-financial assets
At the date of each statement of financial position, we review the carrying amounts of our property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets could have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independently, we estimate the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Our property, plant and equipment items generally do not generate independent cash flows.
In the case of Goodwill, any goodwill acquired is allocated to the cash-generating unit (‘CGU’) expected to benefit from the business combination. CGU to which goodwill is allocated is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the CGU may be impaired. The carrying amount of the CGU is compared to its recoverable amount, which is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and the value in use. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The impairment review requires management to undertake certain significant judgments, including estimating the recoverable value of the CGU to which goodwill is allocated, based on either fair value less costs-to-sell or the value-in-use, as appropriate, in order to reach a conclusion on whether it deems the goodwill is impaired or not. (See "Note 35.1 to our consolidated financial statements").
Incometaxes
We are subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the period in which such determination is made.
Deferred tax assets are reviewed each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.
Operating Segments
IFRS 8 “Operating Segments” requires an entity to report financial and descriptive information about its reportable segments, which are operating segments or aggregations of operating segments that meet specified criteria. Operating segments are components of an entity about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”(or the "CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing our performance. The CODM evaluates the business based on the differences in the nature of its operations, products and services. The amount reported for each segment item is the measure reported to the CODM for these purposes.
The Company operatesWe operate in three major lines of business, namely,namely: Farming; Sugar, Ethanol and Energy; and Land Transformation. In addition, we have a fourth segment, Corporate.
•The Company’s ‘Farming’Our Farming business is further comprised of four reportable segments:
The Company’s ‘Crops’ segment▪Crops: consists of the planting, harvesting and sale of grains, oilseeds and fibers (including wheat, corn, soybeans, cottonpeanuts and sunflowers, among others), and to a lesser extent the provision of grain warehousing/conditioning, handling and drying services to third parties and the purchase and sale of crops produced by third parties. Each underlying crop in this segment does not represent a separate operating segment. Management seeks to maximize the use of the land through the cultivationsowing of one or more type of crops. Types and surface amount of crops cultivated may vary from harvest year to harvest year depending on several factors, some of them out of the Company´sour control. Management is focused on the long-term performance of the productive land, and to that extent, theour performance is assessed considering the aggregated combination, if any, of all crops planted in thea piece of land. A single manager is responsible for the management of operating activity ofactivities relating to all crops rather than for each individual crop.
crop;
The Company’s ‘Rice’ segment▪Rice: consists of the planting, harvesting, processing and marketing of rice;
rice.
The Company’s ‘Dairy’ segment▪Dairy: consists of the production and sale of raw milk;milk and industrialized products, including UHT milk, cheese and powderpowdered milk, among others.
and
The Company’s ‘▪All other segments’ segmentOther Segments:consists of the aggregation of the remaining non-reportable operating segments, whichin our Farming business that do not meet the quantitative thresholds for disclosure and for which the Company’sour management does not consider them to be of continuing significance, namely Coffeecoffee and Cattle.
cattle.
•The Company’s ‘Our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy’Energy segment consists of cultivating sugarcane which is processed in ownedour own sugar mills, transformed into ethanol, sugar and electricity and marketed;then marketed.
•The Company’s ‘Our Land Transformation’Transformation segment comprisesconsist of the (i) identification and acquisition of underdeveloped and undermanaged farmland businesses; and (ii)businesses, the realization of value through the strategic disposition of assets (generating profits).assets.
•The Company’s ‘Corporate’Our Corporate segment comprises certain other activities of a holding functionadministrative nature not allocableassignable to the segmentsour segments.
In order toTo evaluate the economic performance of businesses on a monthly basis, results of operations are based on monthly data that have been adjusted for inflation and converted into the average exchange rate of the U.S. Dollardollar each month infor our Argentine subsidiaries. These already converted figures are subsequently not readjusted and reconverted. It should be noted that thisThis translation methodology for evaluating segment information is the same methodology that the company useswe use to translate our results of operation from itsour other subsidiaries from other countries that have not been designated hyperinflationary economies becauseas, it allows for a more accurate analysis of the economic performance of its business as a whole.
Key Financial and Operating Data
The following table presents selected historical financial and operatingsales data solely for the periods indicated belowbelow:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | | | Chg (%) 2021-2020 | | |
| Sales | | (In thousands of $) | | | | |
| Farming Business | | 562,342 | | | 406,305 | | | | | 38.4 | % | | |
| Crops | | 240,730 | | | 168,461 | | | | | 42.9 | % | | |
| Soybean (1)(2) | | 62,312 | | | 44,271 | | | | | 40.8 | % | | |
| Corn (3) | | 59,803 | | | 44,475 | | | | | 34.5 | % | | |
| Wheat (4) | | 27,349 | | | 14,457 | | | | | 89.2 | % | | |
| Peanut | | 60,939 | | | 46,708 | | | | | 30.5 | % | | |
| Sunflower | | 17,449 | | | 11,066 | | | | | 57.7 | % | | |
| Other crops (5) | | 12,878 | | | 7,484 | | | | | 72.1 | % | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Rice (6) | | 134,869 | | | 101,862 | | | | | 32.4 | % | | |
| Dairy (7) | | 183,054 | | | 133,474 | | | | | 37.1 | % | | |
| All other segments (8) | | 3,689 | | | 2,508 | | | | | 47.1 | % | | |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business | | 562,010 | | | 411,459 | | | | | 36.6 | % | | |
| Sugar | | 208,365 | | | 171,102 | | | | | 21.8 | % | | |
| Ethanol | | 291,883 | | | 199,062 | | | | | 46.6 | % | | |
| Energy | | 48,017 | | | 41,169 | | | | | 16.6 | % | | |
| Other (9) | | 13,745 | | | 126 | | | | | 10,808.7 | % | | |
| Total | | 1,124,352 | | | 817,764 | | | | | 37.5 | % | | |
| Land Transformation (10) | | 6,613 | | | 7,934 | | | | | (16.6) | % | | |
(1) Includes soybean, soybean oil and soybean meal.
(2) 2020/2021 does not include soybean planted in Brazil as itcover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business.
(3) Includes sorghum, chia and bean.
(4) Includes barley, rye, oats, chickpea and vetch.
(5) Includes seeds and farming services.
(6) Includes sales of processed rice including rough rice purchased from third parties and processed in our own facilities, rice seeds and services.
(7) Includes sales of energy from our bio digester, which produces biogas from effluents of our cows.
(8)All other segments include our cattle business which primarily consists of leasing land to a third party based on the price of beef. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—All Other Segments.”
(9) Includes operating leases and other services.
(10) Represents capital gains from the sale of land.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 | | | | |
| | | | Harvest | | Harvest | | Harvest | | Chg (%) 2020/2021-2019/2020 | | Chg (%) 2019/2020-2018/2019 |
| Production | | | | Year (1) | | Year (1) | | Year (1) | | |
| Farming Business | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Crops (tons) (2) | | | | 733,334 | | | 720,059 | | | 652,169 | | | 1.8 | % | | 10.4 | % |
| Soybean (tons) (3) | | | | 172,969 | | | 181,259 | | | 187,226 | | | (4.6) | % | | (3.2) | % |
| Corn (tons) (4) | | | | 327,164 | | | 364,176 | | | 295,990 | | | (10.2) | % | | 23.0 | % |
| Wheat (tons) (5) | | | | 122,749 | | | 104,236 | | | 114,809 | | | 17.8 | % | | (9.2) | % |
| Peanut (tons) | | | | 77,891 | | | 55,630 | | | 47,785 | | | 40 | % | | 16.4 | % |
| Sunflower (tons) | | | | 28,436 | | | 12,652 | | | 5,937 | | | 124.8 | % | | 113.1 | % |
| Cotton Lint (tons) | | | | 1,772 | | | 1,490 | | | 422 | | | 18.9 | % | | 253.1 | % |
| Others | | | | 2,353 | | | 616 | | | — | | | 282.0 | % | | |
| Rice (6) (tons) | | | | 346,685 | | | 278,348 | | | 239,779 | | | 24.6 | % | | 16.1 | % |
(1) The table reflects the production in respect of harvest years as of December 31.
(2) Crop production does not include 300,782 tons and 274,341 tons of forage produced as of December 31, in the 2020/2021 and 2019/2020 harvest years, respectively.
(3) 2020/2021 does not include soybean planted in Brazil as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis. Revenues corresponding to the sale of this product are booked in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business.
(4) Includes sorghum.
(5) Includes barley, rye, oats, chickpea and vetch.
(6) Expressed in tons of rough rice produced on owned and leased farms. The rough rice we produce, along with additional rough rice we purchase from third parties, is usedultimately processed and constitutes the product sold in respect of the rice business.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | | | Chg (%) 2021-2020 | | |
| Processed rice (1) (tons) | | 318,732 | | | 290,030 | | | | | 1.0 | % | | |
| Dairy(2) (thousand liters) | | 173,148 | | | 145,192 | | | | | 19.3 | % | | |
| Processed Milk (3) (thousand liters) | | 352,532 | | | 297,644 | | | | | 18.4 | % | | |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business | | | | | | | | | | |
| Sugar (tons) | | 546,819 | | | 646,981 | | | | | (15.5) | % | | |
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 534,603 | | | 502,170 | | | | | 6.5 | % | | |
| Energy (MWh) | | 730,739 | | | 717,915 | | | | | 1.8 | % | | |
| Land Transformation Business (hectares traded) | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Includes rough rice purchased from third parties and processed in our own facilities. Expressed in tons of rough rice (1 ton of processed rice is approximately equivalent to 1.6 tons of rough rice).
(2)Raw milk produced at our dairy farms.
(3)Own and third parties raw milk processed in our industrial facilities of Morteros and Chivilcoy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021/2022 | | 2020/2021 | | 2019/2020 | | | | Chg (%) 2021/2022-2020/2021 | | Chg (%) 2020/2021-2019/2020 |
| | Harvest | | Harvest | | Harvest | | | | |
| Planted Area | | Year (1) | | Year | | Year | | | | |
| | | | | (Hectares) | | | | | | |
| Farming Business (2) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Crops | | 244,034 | | | 223,165 | | | 203,021 | | | | | 9.4 | % | | 9.9 | % |
| Soybean | | 72,318 | | | 68,315 | | | 73,685 | | | | | 5.9 | % | | (7.3) | % |
| Corn (3) | | 58,239 | | | 56,568 | | | 61,112 | | | | | 3.0 | % | | (7.4) | % |
| Wheat (4) | | 46,509 | | | 44,392 | | | 32,799 | | | | | 4.8 | % | | 35.3 | % |
| Peanut | | 23,664 | | | 26,123 | | | 16,814 | | | | | (9.4) | % | | 55.4 | % |
| Sunflower | | 23,173 | | | 16,164 | | | 6,818 | | | | | 43.4 | % | | 137.1 | % |
| Cotton | | 7,427 | | | 3,519 | | | 4,461 | | | | | 111.1 | % | | (21.1) | % |
| Others | | 2,920 | | | 2,747 | | | 574 | | | | | 6.3 | % | | 378.6 | % |
| Forage | | 9,784 | | | 5,337 | | | 6,758 | | | | | 83.3 | % | | (21.0) | % |
| Rice | | 49,040 | | | 44,282 | | | 41,544 | | | | | 10.7 | % | | 6.6 | % |
| Total Planted Area | | 293,074 | | | 267,447 | | | 244,565 | | | | | 9.6 | % | | 9.4 | % |
| Second Harvest Area | | 39,967 | | | 41,924 | | | 34,556 | | | | | (4.7) | % | | 21.3 | % |
| Leased Area | | 131,862 | | | 109,178 | | | 97,367 | | | | | 20.8 | % | | 12.1 | % |
| Owned Croppable Area (5) | | 111,460 | | | 111,009 | | | 105,883 | | | | | 0.4 | % | | 4.8 | % |
(1) Represents the planting plan for our discussion2021/2022 campaign. As of resultsDecember 31, 2021, 87% of operations.the planting plan is seeded.
(2) Includes hectares planted in the second harvest.
(3) Includes sorghum.
(4) Includes barley, rye, oats, chickpea and vetch.
(5) Does not include potential croppable areas being evaluated for transformation and does not include forage area.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2021 | | 2020 | | | | Chg (%) 2020 - 2019 | | |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business | | | | | | | | | | |
| Sugarcane plantation | | 185,806 | | | 176,651 | | | | | 5.2 | % | | |
| Owned land | | 10,617 | | | 13,291 | | | | | (20.1) | % | | |
| Leased land | | 175,189 | | | 163,360 | | | | | 7.2 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Chg (%) 2019-2018 | | Chg (%) 2018-2017 |
| Sales | | (In thousands of $) | | | | |
| Farming Business | | 355,355 |
| | 282,301 |
| | 322,559 |
| | 25.9 | % | | (12.5 | )% |
| Crops | | 166,446 |
| | 155,418 |
| | 197,222 |
| | 7.1 | % | | (21.2 | )% |
| Soybean(1) | | 46,386 |
| | 84,217 |
| | 85,527 |
| | (44.9 | )% | | (1.5 | )% |
| Corn (2) | | 60,617 |
| | 36,575 |
| | 86,238 |
| | 65.7 | % | | (57.6 | )% |
| Wheat (3) | | 20,318 |
| | 32,706 |
| | 16,723 |
| | (37.9 | )% | | 95.6 | % |
| Peanut | | 28,876 |
| | 4,196 |
| | 3,163 |
| | 588.2 | % | | 32.7 | % |
| Sunflower | | 8,430 |
| | 1,598 |
| | 420 |
| | 427.5 | % | | 280.5 | % |
| Other crops (4) | | 4,311 |
| | 5,246 |
| | 5,151 |
| | (17.8 | )% | | 1.8 | % |
| Adjustments (5) | | (2,492 | ) | | (9,120 | ) | | — |
| | (72.7 | )% | | N/A |
|
| Rice (6) | | 101,156 |
| | 95,403 |
| | 86,478 |
| | 6.0 | % | | 10.3 | % |
| Dairy (7) | | 83,822 |
| | 29,710 |
| | 37,523 |
| | 182.1 | % | | (20.8 | )% |
| All other segments (8) | | 3,931 |
| | 1,770 |
| | 1,336 |
| | 122.1 | % | | 32.5 | % |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business | | 531,783 |
| | 510,938 |
| | 610,619 |
| | 4.1 | % | | (16.3 | )% |
| Sugar | | 97,710 |
| | 128,377 |
| | 305,688 |
| | (23.9 | )% | | (58 | )% |
| Ethanol | | 373,847 |
| | 324,661 |
| | 241,650 |
| | 15.1 | % | | 34.4 | % |
| Energy | | 59,652 |
| | 57,797 |
| | 62,218 |
| | 3.2 | % | | (7.1 | )% |
| Other (9) | | 574 |
| | 103 |
| | 1,063 |
| | 457.3 | % | | (90.3 | )% |
| Total | | 887,138 |
| | 793,239 |
| | 933,178 |
| | 11.8 | % | | (15.0 | )% |
| Land Transformation (10) | | 1,354 |
| | 36,227 |
| | — |
| | (96.3 | )% | | 100% |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 | | | | |
| | | Harvest | | Harvest | | Harvest | | Chg (%) 2018/2019-2017/2018 | | Chg (%) 2017/2018-2016/2017 |
| Production | | Year (11) | | Year (11) | | Year (11) | | |
| Farming Business | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| Crops (tons)(12) | | 649,107 |
| | 533,692 |
| | 603,578 |
| | 21.6 | % | | (11.6 | )% |
| Soybean (tons) | | 187,225 |
| | 171,392 |
| | 206,437 |
| | 9.2 | % | | (17.0 | )% |
| Corn (tons) (2) | | 292,698 |
| | 258,054 |
| | 255,940 |
| | 13.4 | % | | 0.8 | % |
| Wheat (tons) (3) | | 114,809 |
| | 78,640 |
| | 115,173 |
| | 46.0 | % | | (31.7 | )% |
| Peanut (tons) | | 47,785 |
| | 19,901 |
| | 15,757 |
| | 140.1 | % | | 26.3 | % |
| Sunflower (tons) | | 5,937 |
| | 5,181 |
| | 10,112 |
| | 14.6 | % | | (48.8 | )% |
| Cotton Lint (tons) | | 653 |
| | 523 |
| | 159 |
| | 24.8 | % | | 229.0 | % |
| Rice (13) (tons) | | 239,223 |
| | 276,693 |
| | 234,819 |
| | (13.5 | )% | | 17.8 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Chg (%) 2019-2018 | | Chg (%) 2018-2017 |
| Processed rice (14) (tons) | | 279,151 |
| | 275,573 |
| | 241,574 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 14.1 | % |
| Dairy(15) (thousand liters) | | 117,259 |
| | 101,328 |
| | 93,168 |
| | 15.7 | % | | 8.8 | % |
| Processed Milk (16) (thousand liters) | | 182,261 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 100.0 | % | | N/A |
|
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| Sugar (tons) | | 213,256 |
| | 344,137 |
| | 567,068 |
| | (38.0 | )% | | (39.3 | )% |
| Ethanol (cubic meters) | | 756,494 |
| | 675,001 |
| | 434,015 |
| | 12.1 | % | | 55.5 | % |
| Energy (MWh) | | 853,139 |
| | 705,539 |
| | 712,425 |
| | 20.9 | % | | (1.0 | )% |
| Land Transformation Business (hectares traded) | | 6,080 |
| | 9,300 |
| | — |
| | (34.6 | )% | | 100.0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2019/2020 | | 2018/2019 | | 2017/2018 | | 2016/2017 | | Chg (%) 2018/2019-2017/2018 | | Chg (%) 2017/2018-2016/2017 |
| | | Harvest | | Harvest | | Harvest | | Harvest | | |
| Planted Area | | Year (17) | | Year | | Year | | Year | | |
| | | |
| | (Hectares) | | |
| | | | |
| Farming Business (18) | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| Crops | | 206,333 |
| | 191,438 |
| | 195,982 |
| | 190,326 |
| | (2.3 | )% | | 3.0 | % |
| Soybean | | 76,429 |
| | 73,305 |
| | 81,269 |
| | 84,435 |
| | (9.8 | )% | | (3.7 | )% |
| Corn (2) | | 60,929 |
| | 47,058 |
| | 56,741 |
| | 54,086 |
| | (17.1 | )% | | 4.9 | % |
| Wheat (3) | | 32,824 |
| | 40,213 |
| | 36,533 |
| | 38,009 |
| | 10.1 | % | | (3.9 | )% |
| Peanut | | 16,845 |
| | 15,479 |
| | 9,375 |
| | 567 |
| | 65.1 | % | | 1,553.4 | % |
| Sunflower | | 8,009 |
| | 3,824 |
| | 2,869 |
| | 5,413 |
| | 33.3 | % | | (47.0 | )% |
| Cotton | | 4,594 |
| | 5,316 |
| | 3,132 |
| | 2,640 |
| | 69.7 | % | | 18.7 | % |
| Forage | | 6,703 |
| | 6,243 |
| | 6,063 |
| | 5,177 |
| | 3.0 | % | | 17.1 | % |
| Rice | | 41,555 |
| | 40,417 |
| | 40,289 |
| | 39,728 |
| | 0.3 | % | | 1.4 | % |
| Total Planted Area | | 247,888 |
| | 231,855 |
| | 236,271 |
| | 230,054 |
| | (1.9 | )% | | 2.7 | % |
| Second Harvest Area | | 34,425 |
| | 32,219 |
| | 35,948 |
| | 39,739 |
| | (10.4 | )% | | (9.5 | )% |
| Leased Area | | 97,117 |
| | 86,028 |
| | 72,115 |
| | 64,245 |
| | 19.3 | % | | 12.2 | % |
| Owned Croppable Area (19) | | 109,644 |
| | 107,364 |
| | 122,144 |
| | 120,893 |
| | (12.1 | )% | | 1.0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Chg (%) 2018 - 2017 | | Chg (%) 2017 - 2016 |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| Sugarcane plantation | | 166,041 |
| | 153,690 |
| | 143,617 |
| | 8.0 | % | | 7.0 | % |
| Owned land | | 8,748 |
| | 8,748 |
| | 8,748 |
| | — | % | | — | % |
| Leased land | | 157,293 |
| | 144,942 |
| | 134,869 |
| | 8.5 | % | | 7.5 | % |
| |
(1) | Includes soybean, soybean oil and soybean meal. |
| |
(2) | Includes sorghum and chia. |
| |
(3) | Includes barley, rye, oats and chickpea. |
| |
(4) | Includes seeds and farming services. |
| |
(5) | Accumulated adjustment of Hyperinflation accounting translation for our Crops segment sales. |
| |
(6) | Sales of processed rice including rough rice purchased from third parties and processed in our own facilities, rice seeds and services. |
| |
(7) | Includes sales of energy from our biodigester, which produces biogas from effluents of our cows. |
| |
(8) | All other segments include our cattle business which primarily consists of leasing land to a third party based on the price of beef. See “Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Cattle Business”. |
| |
(9) | Includes operating leases and other services. |
| |
(10) | Represents capital gains from the sale of land. |
| |
(11) | The table reflects the production in respect of harvest years as of December 31. |
| |
(12) | Crop production does not include 212,650 tons and 128,151 tons of forage produced as of December 31, in the 2018/2019 and 2017/2018 harvest years, respectively. |
| |
(13) | Expressed in tons of rough rice produced on owned and leased farms. The rough rice we produce, along with additional rough rice we purchase from third parties, is ultimately processed and constitutes the product sold in respect of the rice business. |
| |
(14) | Includes rough rice purchased from third parties and processed in our own facilities. Expressed in tons of rough rice (1 ton of processed rice is approximately equivalent to 1.6 tons of rough rice). |
| |
(15) | Raw milk produced at our dairy farms. |
| |
(16) | Own and third parties raw milk processed in our industrial facilities of Morteros and Chivilcoy. |
| |
(17) | Represents the planting plan for 2019/2020 campaign. As of December 31, 2019, 80.4% of the planting plan is seeded. |
| |
(18) | Includes hectares planted in the second harvest. |
| |
(19) | Does not include potential croppable areas being evaluated for transformation and does not include forage area. |
Year ended December 31, 20192021, as compared to year ended December 31, 20182020
The following table sets forth certain financial information with respect to our consolidated results of operations for the years indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | Chg (%) 2021-2020 |
| | (In thousands of $) | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 1,124,352 | | | 817,764 | | | 37.5 | % |
| Cost of goods sold, and services rendered | (854,965) | | | (611,946) | | | 39.7 | % |
| Initial recognition and Changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 227,740 | | | 122,729 | | | 85.6 | % |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | (12,879) | | | 7,005 | | | (283.9) | % |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 484,248 | | | 335,552 | | | 44.3 | % |
| General and administrative expenses | (69,794) | | | (53,428) | | | 30.6 | % |
| Selling expenses | (117,662) | | | (95,058) | | | 23.8 | % |
| Other operating income, net | (18,768) | | | 1,987 | | | (1,044.5) | % |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 278,024 | | | 189,053 | | | 47.1 | % |
| Finance income | 36,670 | | | 26,054 | | | 40.7 | % |
| Finance costs | (151,681) | | | (213,776) | | | (29.0) | % |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 11,541 | | | 12,064 | | | (4.3) | % |
| Financial results, net | (103,470) | | | (175,658) | | | (41.1) | % |
| Profit Before Income Tax | 174,554 | | | 13,395 | | | 1,203.1 | % |
| Income tax Expense | (43,837) | | | (12,325) | | | 255.7 | % |
| Profit for the Year | 130,717 | | | 1,070 | | | 12,116.5 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | Chg (%) 2019-2018 |
| | (In thousands of $) | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 887,138 |
| | 793,239 |
| | 11.8 | % |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (671,173 | ) | | (609,965 | ) | | 10.0 | % |
| Initial recognition and Changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 68,589 |
| | 16,195 |
| | 323.5 | % |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,825 |
| | (909 | ) | | (300.8 | )% |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 286,379 |
| | 198,560 |
| | 44.2 | % |
| General and administrative expenses | (57,202 | ) | | (56,080 | ) | | 2.0 | % |
| Selling expenses | (106,972 | ) | | (90,215 | ) | | 18.6 | % |
| Other operating income, net | (822 | ) | | 104,232 |
| | (100.8 | )% |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 121,383 |
| | 156,497 |
| | (22.4 | )% |
| Finance income | 9,908 |
| | 8,581 |
| | 15.5 | % |
| Finance costs | (202,566 | ) | | (271,263 | ) | | (25.3 | )% |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 92,437 |
| | 81,928 |
| | 12.8 | % |
| Financial results, net | (100,221 | ) | | (180,754 | ) | | (44.6 | )% |
| Profit / (Loss) Before Income Tax | 21,162 |
| | (24,257 | ) | | (187.2 | )% |
| Income tax (Expense) / Benefit | (20,820 | ) | | 1,024 |
| | (2,133.2 | )% |
| Profit / (Loss) for the Year | 342 |
| | (23,233 | ) | | (101.5 | )% |
Sales of Goods and Services Rendered
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | 240,730 | | | 134,869 | | | 183,054 | | | 3,689 | | | 562,010 | | | 1,124,352 | |
| 2020 | 168,461 | | | 101,862 | | | 133,474 | | | 2,508 | | | 411,459 | | | 817,764 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2019 | 166,446 |
| | 101,156 |
| | 83,822 |
| | 3,931 |
| | 531,783 |
| | 887,138 |
|
| 2018 | 155,418 |
| | 95,403 |
| | 29,710 |
| | 1,770 |
| | 510,938 |
| | 793,239 |
|
Total salesSales of goods and serviceservices rendered totaled $887.1increased 37.5%, from $817.8 million 11.8% higher thanduring the year ended December 31, 2020, to $1,124.4 million during the same period in 2018,2021, primarily as a result of:
• A $54.1 million increase in our Dairy segment mainly caused by (i) a 128.2% increase in volume of dairy products sold such as UHT milk, powder milk, cheese, etc, measured in liters of fluid milk equivalent, from 89.5 million liters in 2018 to 204.2 million liters in 2019, (ii) a 39.3% increase in average milk selling prices, from $0.28 per liter of fluid milk equivalent in 2018 to $0.39 per liter in 2019, mainly explained by sales of manufactured products from our new industrial facilities in Morteros and Chivilcoy; and (iii) the negative impact of $3.5 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in respect of Argentine operations in 2018 compared to the negative impact of $0.9 million in 2019.
The increase in the volume of milk sold is mainly explained by an increase of 18.5% of fluid milk production in our own free-stalls, due to a 19.6% increase in the number of cows, from 7,581 average heads in 2018 to 9,066 average heads in 2019, coupled with 84.2 million liters of third parties fluid milk purchases that were processed in our industrial facilities, compared to zero liters purchased in 2018.
A $20.8$150.6 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, mainly due to: (i) a 5.5%45.2% increase in sugar price, from $266.9 per ton during the year ended December 31, 2020 to $387.6 per ton during the same period in 2021, (ii) a 51.6% increase in ethanol price, from $406.5 per cubic meter ("m3") during the year m3 ended December 31, 2020 to $616.3 per m3 during the same period in 2021, (iii) a 22.3% increase in energy prices, from $42.1 per MWh during year ended December 31, 2020, to $51.5 per MWh during the same period in 2021. This increase in prices was partially offset by a decrease in selling volumes mainly due to (i) a 3.0% decrease in the volume of sugar and ethanol sold, measured in TRS(*),TRSequivalent, from 1,562.01,531.4 thousand tons of TRS during 2018the year ended December 31, 2020 to 1,648.01,485.3 thousand tons of TRS during the same period in 2019;2021; and (ii) a 34.7% higher4.9% decrease in the volume of energy sold, duefrom 978.9 thousand MWh duringthe year ended December 31, 2020 to a 26.7% increase in cogeneration efficiency, from 62.1 KWh per ton in 2018 to 78.7 KWh per ton in 2019 due to the burning of a stockpile of bagasse that was carried over from 2018 and to the burning of woodchips acquired to third parties, coupled with higher commercialization of third parties energy, from 72.1931.1 thousand MWh during 2018 to 173.1 MWh 2019.the same period in 2021.
The increasedecrease in volume of sugar and ethanol sold measured in TRS was mainly due to (i) an increase inof inventories of 53.1from 10,4 thousand tons measured in TRS in 2018equivalent during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a decreasean increase in inventories of 15.098.3 thousand tons measured in 2019TRS equivalent in the same period in 2021 because of our strategy to carry stock to capture higher expected margins. (ii) a 4.2% increase1.5% decrease in TRS content of our sugarcane,milling, from 127.6 kilograms per ton of sugarcane11.1 million tons during the year ended December 2021 to 10.9 million tons during the same period in 20182021 due to 132.9 kilograms per ton of sugarcane(a) a 13.3% decrease in 2019, mainly explained by the dryyields due to adverse weather conditions in Mato Grosso do Sul since March 2019. This wasaffecting cane development, partially offset by a 4.4% decrease15.4% increase in milling,harvested area from 11.4 million tons during 2018 to 10.9 million tons in 2019. The decrease in milling is explained by lower milling per hour, from 2,130 tons per hour in 2018, to 1,864 tons per hour in 2019, mainly explained by our decision to lower crushing pace in order to allow the cane grow and recover from adverse weather conditions experienced132.4 thousand hectares during the year which was partially offset by an increaseended December 31, 2020 to 152.8 thousand hectares during the same period in effective milling days from 222 days in 2018, to 242 days in 2019, due to dry weather conditions.2021.
The increase in volume sold was partially offset by (i) a 1.3% decrease in TRS price, from $290.1 per kilogram of TRS in 2018, to $286.2 per kilogram of TRS in 2019. Although ethanol price per cubic meter decreased 3.1% from $503.8 per cubic meter in 2018 to $488.1 in 2019, ethanol sill showed a 4.3% premium per kilogram of TRS over sugar and therefore we sought to maximize ethanol production reaching a total share in the production mix of 79% of total TRS production, offsetting decrease in prices; and (ii) a 22.5% decrease in the price of energy, from $77.4 per MWh in 2018 to $60.0 per MWh in 2019.
The following figure sets forth the variables that determine our Sugar and Ethanol sales:
| |
(1) | On average, one metric ton of sugarcane contains 140 kilograms of TRS. While a mill can produce either sugar or ethanol, the TRS input requirements differ between these two products. On average, 1.045 kilograms of TRS equivalent are required to produce 1.0 kilogram of sugar, while the amount of TRS required to produce 1 liter of ethanol is 1.691 kilograms |
The following figure sets forth the variables that determine our Energy sales:
(*) On average, one metric ton of sugarcane contains 140 kilograms of TRS. While a mill can produce either sugar or ethanol, the TRS input requirements differ between these two products. On average, 1.045 kilograms of TRS equivalent are required to produce 1.0 kilogram of sugar, while the amount of TRS required to produce 1 liter of ethanol is 1.691 kilograms.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales of manufactured products for the years indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | Chg % | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Chg % | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Chg % |
| | (in millions of $) | | (in thousand units) | | (in dollars per unit) |
| Ethanol (M3) | 291.9 | | | 199.1 | | | 46.6 | % | | 473.6 | | | 489.7 | | | (3.3) | % | | 616.3 | | | 406.5 | | | 51.6 | % |
| Sugar (tons) | 208.4 | | | 171.1 | | | 21.8 | % | | 537.6 | | | 641.1 | | | (16.1) | % | | 387.6 | | | 266.9 | | | 45.2 | % |
| Energy (MWh) | 48.0 | | | 41.2 | | | 16.5 | % | | 931.1 | | | 978,9 | | (4,9%) | | 51.5 | | | 42.1 | | | 23.3 | % |
| Others | 13.8 | | | 0.1 | | | 13,700.0 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL | 562.1 | | | 411.5 | | | 36.6 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | Chg % | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Chg % | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Chg % |
| | (in millions of $) | | (in thousand units) | | (in dollars per unit) |
| Ethanol (M3) | 373.8 |
| | 324.7 |
| | 15.1 | % | | 766.0 |
| | 644.4 |
| | 18.9 | % | | 488.1 |
| | 503.8 |
| | (3.1 | )% |
| Sugar (tons) | 97.7 |
| | 128.4 |
| | (23.9 | )% | | 337.4 |
| | 451.5 |
| | (25.3 | )% | | 289.6 |
| | 284.4 |
| | 1.8 | % |
| Energy (MWh) | 59.7 |
| | 57.8 |
| | 3.3 | % | | 994.4 |
| | 747.2 |
| | 33.1 | % | | 60.0 |
| | 77.4 |
| | (22.5 | )% |
| Others | 0.6 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 500.0 | % | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| TOTAL | 531.8 |
| | 510.9 |
| | 4.1 | % | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
•A $11.0$72.3 million increase in our Crops segment mainly driven by (i) a 72.9%general increase in crop prices, (ii) a 45.7% increase in the volume of cornwheat sold, from 238.279.9 thousand tons in 2018during the year ended December 31, 2020, to 411.8116.4 thousand tons during the same period in 2019, driven by2021, mainly due to (a) higher yields, from 4.9 tons per hectare during 2018 to 6.5 tons per hectare in 2019; and (b) an increase in inventories of 26.4 thousand tonsplanted area, (iii) a 14.2% increase in 2018, compared to a decrease in inventories of 39.7 thousand tons in 2019, (ii) an increase inthe volume of peanut sold, from 10.543.1 thousand tons of which 6.2 thousand are processed by third parties,during the year ended December 31, 2020, to 30.549.2 thousand tons during the same period in 2021
mainly due to an increase in planted area, (iv) a 66.2% increase in the volume of industrialized peanutsunflower sold, from 13.9 thousand tons during the year ended December 31, 2020, to 23.1 thousand tons during the same period in 2019 from our new processing
facility; (iv) the2021 mainly explained by an increase in planted area; and (v) a negative impact of $9.1$1.7 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during 2018the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the negativea positive impact of $2.5$11.8 million during the same period in 2019.2021.
This increase was partially offset by (i) a 26.4%12.2% decrease in soybean prices, from $318.9 per ton in 2018 to $234.6 per ton in 2019, mainly explained by lower sales from Uruguay, which has higher prices as no export taxes are charged, from 82.5 thousand tons in 2018 to 14.9 thousand tons in 2019 (ii) a 25.1% decrease in the volume of soybeancorn sold, from 264.1 thousand tons in 2018 to 197.8 thousand tons in 2019 mainly driven by, (a) lower planted area from 81.3 thousand hectares in 2018 to 73.3 thousand hectares for 2019; and (b) lower commercialization from third parties, from 76.3 thousand tons in 2018, to no seles in 2019; and (iii) a 37.7% decrease in the volume of wheat sold, from 174.5313.2 thousand tons during 2018the year ended December 31, 2020, to 108.8274.9 thousand tons during the same period in 2019, due to lower commercialization from third parties, from 106.5 thousand tons in 2018, to 4.7 thousand tons in 2019, partially offset by higher yields, from 2.2 tons per hectare in 2018 to 2.9 tons per hectare in 2019, and2021 manly explained by a decrease in inventoriesyields and planted area (ii) a 11.3% decrease in volume of 14.1Soybean sold from 189.3 thousand tons in 2019, comparedduring the year ended December 31, 2020, to an increase in inventories of 14.6167.9 thousand tons during the same period in 2018.2021 manly explained by a decrease in planted area
The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales for the years indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | % Chg | | 2021 | | 2020 | | % Chg | | 2021 | | 2020 | | % Chg |
| | (In millions of $) | | (In thousands of tons) | | (In $ per ton) |
| Soybean | 62.3 | | | 44.3 | | | 40.6 | % | | 167.9 | | | 189.3 | | | (11.3) | % | | 371.0 | | | 234.1 | | | 58.5 | % |
| Corn (1) | 59.8 | | | 44.5 | | | 34.4 | % | | 274.9 | | | 313.2 | | | (12.2) | % | | 217.5 | | | 142.1 | | | 53.1 | % |
| Wheat (2) | 27.3 | | | 14.5 | | | 88.3 | % | | 116.4 | | | 79.9 | | | 45.7 | % | | 234.6 | | | 181.5 | | | 29.3 | % |
| Peanut | 60.9 | | | 46.7 | | | 34.0 | % | | 49.2 | | | 43.1 | | | 14.2 | % | | 1,238.4 | | | 1,083.5 | | | 14.3 | % |
| Sunflower | 17.4 | | | 11.1 | | | 56.8 | % | | 23.1 | | 13.9 | | 66.2 | % | | 755 | | 799 | | (5.5) | % |
| Others | 12.9 | | | 7.5 | | | 72.0 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | 240.7 | | | 168.5 | | | 42.8 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | % Chg | | 2019 | | 2018 | | % Chg | | 2019 | | 2018 | | % Chg |
| | (In millions of $) | | (In thousands of tons) | | (In $ per ton) |
| Soybean | 46.4 |
| | 84.2 |
| | (44.9 | )% | | 197.8 |
| | 264.1 |
| | (25.1 | )% | | 234.6 |
| | 318.9 |
| | (26.4 | )% |
| Corn (1) | 60.6 |
| | 36.6 |
| | 65.6 | % | | 411.8 |
| | 238.2 |
| | 72.9 | % | | 147.2 |
| | 153.6 |
| | (4.2 | )% |
| Wheat (2) | 20.3 |
| | 32.7 |
| | (37.9 | )% | | 108.8 |
| | 174.5 |
| | (37.7 | )% | | 186.7 |
| | 187.4 |
| | (0.4 | )% |
| Peanut | 28.9 |
| | 4.2 |
| | 588.1 | % | | 30.5 |
| | 10.5 |
| | 190.5 | % | | 0.9 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 125.0 | % |
| Others | 12.7 |
| | 6.8 |
| | 86.8 | % | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Adjustments (3) | (2.5 | ) | | (9.1 | ) | | (72.5 | )% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | 166.4 |
| | 155.4 |
| | 7.1 | % | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| |
(1) | Includes sorghum and popcorn. |
| |
(2) | Includes barley, rye, oats and chickpea. |
(1)Includes sorghum and popcorn.
(2)Includes barley, rye, oats and chickpea.
•A $5.8$49.6 million increase in our Dairy segment mainly due to (i) a 11.25% increase in volume of dairy products sold such as fluid milk, powder milk and cheese, measured in liters of fluid milk equivalent, from 342.1 million liters during the year ended December 31, 2020 to 380.6 million liters during the same period in 2021, (ii) a 23.1% increase in average selling milk price, from $0.39 per liter during the year ended December 31, 2020 to $0.48 per liter during the same period in 2021; and (iii) a negative impact of $2 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to a positive impact of $10.3 million during the same period in 2021.
The increase in volume of processed milk sold is mainly due to an increase of 19.3% of fluid milk production in our free-stalls due to a 19% increase in the number of cows, from 10,876 average heads during the year ended December 31, 2020, to 12,942 average heads during the same period in 2021.
•A $33 million increase in our Rice segment, mainly explained by (i) a 5.3%12.4% increase in the price of white rice sold, from $471.4 per ton during the year ended December 31, 2020 to $529.7 per ton during the same period in 2021; (ii) a 13.9% increase in the volume of white rice sold, from 182.1180 thousand tons in 2018during the year ended December 31, 2020, to 191.7205.1 thousand tons during the same period in 2019; and (ii)2021 mainly due to (a) a 16.4% increase in yields from 6.7 tons per hectare during the year ended December 31, 2020 to 7.8 tons per hectare during the same period in 2021; (b) an increase in planted area resulting in higher rough rice to be processed during the year; (iii) a negative impact of $4.6$1 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations in 2018during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to a negativepositive impact of $1.0$4.3 million during the same period in 2019. The increase in volume of white rice sold is mainly explained2021. Partially offset by (a) an increase in inventories of 13.9 thousand tons in 2018, compared to a decrease in inventories of 6.6 thousand tons in 2019; and (b) a 5.6% increaseLower purchase of rough rice processed, from 168.5 thousand in 2018, to 178.0 thousand increase in 2019.
This increase was partially offset by a reduction in average selling prices from $447.3 per ton in 2018 to $431.4 per ton in 2019.
The profit of our agricultural produce is recognized under the line items “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest”. When the agricultural produce is sold to third parties we do not record any additional profit or loss asfrom 26.4 thousand tons during the gain or loss has already been recognized.year ended December 31, 2020, to 12.2 thousand tons during the same period in 2021
The profit of our manufactured products is recognized when they are sold. The cost of manufactured products includes, among others, the cost of agricultural produce transferred internally at fair market value (i.e. harvested sugarcane, rough rice, fluid milk, etc).
Cost of Goods Sold and Services Rendered
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (213,231) | | | (112,045) | | | (158,077) | | | (3,111) | | | (368,501) | | | (854,965) | |
| 2020 | (149,250) | | | (73,830) | | | (116,007) | | | (1,962) | | | (270,897) | | | (611,946) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2019 | (156,510 | ) | | (73,951 | ) | | (76,694 | ) | | (3,452 | ) | | (360,566 | ) | | (671,173 | ) |
| 2018 | (156,936 | ) | | (74,973 | ) | | (28,127 | ) | | (1,313 | ) | | (348,616 | ) | | (609,965 | ) |
In the case of our agricultural produce sold to third parties (i.e., soybean, corn, wheat and fluid milk), the value of Cost of Goods and Services Rendered is equal to the value of Sales and Services Rendered. The profit of these products is fully recognized under the line items “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest.” When the agricultural produce is sold to third parties, we do not record any additional profit or loss as the gain or loss has already been recognized.
In the case of our manufactured products sold to third parties (i.e., sugar, ethanol, energy, white rice, processed milk and peanut), the profit is recognized when they are sold. The Cost of Goods and Services Rendered of these products includes, among others, the cost of the agricultural produce (i.e., harvested sugarcane and rough rice), which is the raw material used in the industrial process and is transferred internally from the farm to the industry at fair market value.
Cost of manufactured products sold, and services rendered totaled $671.2increased 39.7%, from $611.9 million 10.0% more than 2018.during the twelve-month
period ended December 31, 2020, to $855 million during the same period in 2021. This increase was primarily due to:
•a $48.6 million increase in our Dairy segment, explained by increase in volume of processed milk sold by our new industrial facilities in Morteros and Chivilcoy, compared to no processed milk during 2018, coupled with the effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations, from positive impact of $3.6 million effect in 2018 compared to a positive impact of $0.8 million during the same period in 2019.
a $12.0$97.6 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, mainly due to the 5.5% increase in the volume
of sugar and ethanol sold measured in TRS and partially offset by a 2.0% lower49.5% higher unitary cost in dollar terms mostlymainly affected by the increase in sugarcane prices.
•a $64.0 million increase in our Crops segment, mainly due the increase in Sales of Goods and Services Rendered coupled with a positive impact of $1.5 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $10.1 million during the same period in 2021.
•a $42.1 million increase in our Dairy segment, explained by (i) the depreciationan increase in volume of the Brazilian Real in 2019, (ii) industrial efficiencies that reducedprocessed milk sold by our industrial costsfacilities in Morteros and Chivilcoy; and (ii) a 29.1% decreasepositive impact of $1.7 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $8.3 million during the same period in third parties' purchase of sugarcane, which has 2021.
•a higher cost, from 0.6$38.2 million tons during 2018, to 0.4 million tons in 2019.
Partially offset by:
a $1.0 million decreaseincrease in our Rice segment, mainly explained by a 33.2% higher unitary cost due to (i) 6.9% lower unitary cost in dollar terms due to the depreciation of the Argentine Peso,higher rough rice prices, coupled with efficiency gains in industrial performance. This was partially offset by a 5.4%an increase in the volume of white rice sold.sold and a positive impact of $0.6 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $2.3 million during the same period in 2021.
Initial Recognition and Changes in Fair Value of Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2019 | 29,741 |
| | 12,215 |
| | 13,510 |
| | 13 |
| | 13,110 |
| | 68,589 |
|
| 2018 | 28,667 |
| | 4,125 |
| | 5,455 |
| | (1,199 | ) | | (20,853 | ) | | 16,195 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | 73,990 | | | 43,834 | | | 19,895 | | | 1,362 | | | 88,659 | | | 227,740 | |
| 2020 | 40,104 | | | 18,677 | | | 12,344 | | | 1,256 | | | 50,348 | | | 122,729 | |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce totaled $ 68.6 increased 85.6%, from $122.7
million 323.5% more than 2018. Thisduring the year ended December 31, 2020, to $227.7 million during the same period in 2021. The increase was primarilymainly due to:
•A $34.0$38.3 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment from a loss of $20.9$50.3 million in 2018during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $37.8$19.7 million were unrealized losses)gains) to a gain of $13.1$88.7 million during the same period in 20192021 (which includes $0.9$16.3 million of unrealized losses). This increase was mainly due to:
| |
– | A $36.9 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested sugarcane, from a loss of $37.8 million in 2018 to a loss of $0.9 million in 2019, mainly generated by a decrease in projected sugar prices during 2018, compared to an increase in projected sugar prices in 2019, coupled with increase in sugarcane area. |
Partially offset by:
| |
– | A $2.9-A $69.4 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested sugarcane, from a gain of $16.9 million during 2018 to a gain of $14.0 million in 2019 due to the decrease in sugarcane yields. |
a $8.0 million increase in our Dairy segment, mainly due to the increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of fluid milk,harvested sugarcane, from $5.5a gain of $29.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $99.3 million during the same period in 2018 (of which $7.9 million were realized) to $13.5 million2021 driven by an increase in 2019 (of which $17.7 million were realized), mainly due to:sugarcane prices.
| |
– | A $9.8 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of realized production, from $7.9 million during 2018 to $17.7 million in 2019, mainly due to (i) a 19.6% increase in milking cows, from 7,581 average heads in 2018 to 9,066 average heads in 2019 as we are completing capacity of our third free-stall; and (ii) higher milk selling prices, from 0.28 dollar per liter in 2018 to 0.31 dollar per liter in 2019. |
| |
– | A negative impact of $1.8 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during 2018 compared to a negative impact of $0.2 million in 2019. |
Partially offset by:
| |
– | A $3.4 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of unrealized production, from a loss of $0.6 million in 2018 to a loss of $4.0 million in the same period in 2019, mainly due to a 73.5% higher depreciation of the Argentine Peso during 2018, compared to the same period in 2019, which impacts on the valuation of the cow herd. |
-A $8.1$35.6 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested sugarcane, from a gain of $19.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a loss of $15.9 million in the same period in 2021, mainly by a decrease in expected yields as a consequence of the negative impact of the frost in our unharvested cane.
•A $33.9 million increase in our Crops segment from $40.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $29.6 million were realized gains) to $74 million during the same period in 2021 (of which $51.3 million were realized gains). This increase is primarily due to:
- The recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested crops at the point of harvest, increased $23.9 million, from a gain of $39.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $63.4 million during the same period in 2021, mainly due by an increase in average selling prices.
- A negative impact of $0.9 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $8.3 million during the same period in 2021.
•A $25.1 million increase in our Rice segment, from $4.1$18.7 million during 2018the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $15.5 million were realized gains) to $12.2$43.8 million during the same period in 2019.2021 (of which $33 million were realized gains). This increase is due to:
| |
– | A negative impact of $4.8 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during 2018, compared to a negative impact of $1.0 million in 2019. |
| |
– | A $2.6 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested rice, from a loss of $3.9 million in 2018 to a loss of $1.3 million in 2019, mainly explained by higher projected prices. |
| |
– | A $1.7 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested rice at the point of harvest, from $12.8 million in 2018 (of which $9.1 million were realized) to $14.5 million during the same period in 2019 (of which $12.7 million were realized), mainly explained by lower costs in dollar terms, due to the Argentine Peso real depreciation during the last year |
-A $1.0$19.4 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested rice at the point of harvest, from a gain of $17.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $36.6 million during the same period in 2021, mainly explained by 16.4% increase in yields, a 6.6% increase in planted area coupled with higher prices.
- A negative impact of $0.8 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $6.7 million during the same period in 2021.
•A $7.6 million increase in our CropsDairy segment, from $28.7$12.3 million during 2018the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $28.2$17.8 million were realized) to $29.7$19.9 million during the same period in 2021 (of which $24.6 million were realized), mainly due to:
-A $6.8 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of realized production, from $17.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to $24.6 million in 2019 (of which $24.2 million were realized). This increase is primarily due to:
| |
– | A negative impact of $7.8 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during 2018 compared to a negative impact of $0.5 million during the same period in 2019. |
| |
– | The recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested crops, increased $4.4 million, from a loss of $2.2 million in 2018 to a gain of $2.2 million in 2019,the same period in 2021, mainly due to favorable weather conditions in the humid pampas which increased expected yields for corn. |
Partially offset by:
| |
– | A decrease of $10.5 million in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested crops at the point of harvest, from $38.6 million in 2018 to $28.1 million in the same period in 2019, mainly due to lower local commodities prices at the |
point of harvesting. This decrease was partially offset by (i) higher grain production; and (ii) lower production costs in dollar terms, due to an increase in the depreciationnumber of cows and an increase in cow productivity.
-A negative impact of $0.3 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the Argentine Peso.year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $1.6 million in the same period in 2021.
Changes in Net Realizable Value of Agricultural Produce after Harvest
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2019 | 1,825 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,825 |
|
| 2018 | (909 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (909 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (11,384) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,495) | | | (12,879) | |
| 2020 | 7,007 | | | — | | | (2) | | | — | | | — | | | 7,005 | |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest is mainly composed by: (i) profit or loss from commodity price fluctuations during the period of time the agricultural produce is in inventory, which impacts its fair value; (ii) profit or loss from the valuation of forward contracts related to agricultural produce in inventory; and (iii) profit from direct exports.
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest increased $2.7decreased from a gain of $7 million fromduring the year ended December 31, 2020, to a loss of $0.9$12.9 million during 2018the same period in 2021, as a result of decrease of crops prices after harvest which impacted in a lower fair value of our crops held in inventories during year ended on December 31, 2021, compared to a gainhigher fair value of $1.8 millionour crops held in 2019. This increase is mainly explained byinventories during the result of the valuation of soybean and corn forward contracts which generated a higher gain due to a decreasesame period in prices in 2019.2020.
GeneralCost of Goods Sold and Administrative ExpensesServices Rendered
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (213,231) | | | (112,045) | | | (158,077) | | | (3,111) | | | (368,501) | | | (854,965) | |
| 2020 | (149,250) | | | (73,830) | | | (116,007) | | | (1,962) | | | (270,897) | | | (611,946) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2019 | (5,533 | ) | | (6,605 | ) | | (4,098 | ) | | (150 | ) | | (21,925 | ) | | (18,891 | ) | | (57,202 | ) |
| 2018 | (4,202 | ) | | (5,939 | ) | | (2,280 | ) | | (164 | ) | | (25,302 | ) | | (18,193 | ) | | (56,080 | ) |
Our general and administrative expenses totaled $57.2 million, 2.0% more than 2018. The increase is mainly explained by an increase in depreciation expenses for Crops, Rice and Dairy segments, mainly due to recent investments. This was partially offset byIn the depreciation of the Argentine Peso and the Brazilian Real.
Selling Expenses
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2019 | (12,724 | ) | | (20,574 | ) | | (6,234 | ) | | (182 | ) | | (67,116 | ) | | (142 | ) | | (106,972 | ) |
| 2018 | (5,447 | ) | | (14,090 | ) | | (942 | ) | | (149 | ) | | (69,442 | ) | | (145 | ) | | (90,215 | ) |
Selling expenses totaled $107.0 million, 18.6% more than 2018. This increase is explained by:
a $7.3 million increase in our Crops segment due to (i) export taxes paid from export sales of peanut in 2019 compared to null exports taxes of peanut in 2018, (ii) a 7.1% increase in total segment sales; and (iii) the effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations, from positive impact of $0.5 million effect during 2018 compared to a positive impact of $0.1 million in 2019.
a $6.5 million increase in the Rice segment, due to the increase in white rice sales by 5.3%, coupled with a higher mix of sales destined to export market which has higher selling expenses due to export taxes in Argentina since September 2018,
coupled with the effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations, from positive impact of $1.4 million effect during 2018 compared to a positive impact of $0.5 million in 2019.
a $5.3 million increase in the Dairy segment due to higher exports of powder milk, from 16.8 thousand liters equivalent during 2018 to 40.8 thousand liters equivalent in 2019, coupled with higher freight costscase of our milk destinedagricultural produce sold to internal market from processing facilities to distribution centersthird parties (i.e., soybean, corn, wheat and fluid milk), the value of wholesalers.
Partially offset by:
a $2.3 million decrease in the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, due to the decrease in sugar VHP exports, from 311.9 thousand tons in 2018, to 179.2 thousand tons in 2019, partially offset by the increase in ethanol and energy sales in the domestic market.
Other Operating Income, Net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2019 | (1,358 | ) | | 267 |
| | (703 | ) | | (354 | ) | | 126 |
| | 1,354 |
| | (154 | ) | | (822 | ) |
| 2018 | 7,163 |
| | 217 |
| | (997 | ) | | 13,396 |
| | 48,357 |
| | 36,227 |
| | (131 | ) | | 104,232 |
|
Other operating income decreased 100.8%, from a gain of $104.2 million in 2018, to a loss of $0.8 million during 2019, primarily due to:
• a $48.2 million decrease in our Sugar, Ethanol & Energy segment mainly explained by the mark-to-market effect of our sugar hedge positions. The $48.4 million in 2018 is explained by the decrease in prices, which generated a positive effect in our sugar hedge positions.
a $34.9 million decrease in Land Transformation segment due to $36.2 million received in connection with the sale of "Rio de Janeiro" and "Conquista" farms, located in Brazil, for a total consideration of $53.0 million for 9,300 croppable hectares during 2018, to $1.4 million for the sale of "Alto Alegre" farm, located in Brazil, for a total consideration of $16.8 million for 6,080 hectares in 2019. The lower result generated by "Alto Alegre" farm sale in 2019 compared to previous year, is mainly explained by the increase in our farmlands valuation after its revaluation in September, 2018 (See "—Revaluation Model for farmlands (IAS 16/IAS40)").
a $13.8 million decrease in All Other Segments related to lower net gains from the fair value adjustment of Investment property, composed of own farms under lease agreements (i.e. beef cattle farms).
a $8.5 million decrease in our Crops segment due to the mark-to-market effect of our soybean and corn hedge positions.
Financial Results, Net
Our financial results, net, represented a loss of of $100.2 million in 2019, compared to a loss of $180.8 million in 2018. This was mainly due to (i) a 40.8% decrease in foreign exchange losses, from a loss of $183.2 million in 2018 to a loss of $108.5 million during the same period in 2019, mainly explained by a lower impact on our dollar denominated debt by the 102.3% depreciation of the Argentine Peso during 2018 compared to a 58.9% depreciation of the Argentine Peso in 2019; and (ii) a positive impact of $92.4 million regarding inflation accounting effect in 2019, compared to a $81.9 million positive effect in 2018. This was partially offset by; (a) a 16.6% increase of interest expense, from $51.6 million during 2018 to $60.1 million in 2019, mainly explained by higher indebtedness position during 2019; and (b) a $9.5 million increase in finance cost related to lease liabilities due to adoption of IFRS 16 in relation to leases which had previously been classified as ‘operating leases’ under the principles of IAS 17 Leases.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of financial results for the periods indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | |
| | (In $ thousand) | | % Change |
| Interest income | 7,319 |
| | 7,915 |
| | (7.5 | )% |
| Interest expense | (60,134 | ) | | (51,577 | ) | | 16.6 | % |
| Finance Cost - Right-of-use Assets | (9,524 | ) | | — |
| | 100.0 | % |
| Foreign exchange losses, net | (108,458 | ) | | (183,195 | ) | | (40.8 | )% |
| Cash flow hedge – transfer from equity | (15,594 | ) | | (26,693 | ) | | (41.6 | )% |
| Gain from interest rate /foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments | 1,189 |
| | (3,024 | ) | | (139.3 | )% |
| Taxes | (4,364 | ) | | (3,136 | ) | | 39.2 | % |
| Other Expenses | (3,092 | ) | | (2,972 | ) | | 4.0 | % |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 92,437 |
| | 81,928 |
| | 12.8 | % |
| Total Financial Results | (100,221 | ) | | (180,754 | ) | | (44.6 | )% |
Income Tax benefit / (expense)
Current income tax totaled an expense of $ 20.8 million, which equates to an effective rate of 98% compared to a benefit of $1.0 million in 2018.
The income tax calculated at the applicable tax rates to profits in the respective countries in 2019 would be $7.2 million expense. The main adjustments to this amount are: (i) an adjustment of $23.8 million related to the application of IAS 29 on Shareholders' equity of our Argentine Subsidiaries; (ii) the recognition of unused tax losses for $ 3 million and (iii) $1.5 million related to non deductible items. This effects were partially offset by (i) non-taxable income in the amount of $11.5 million related to a Complementary Law in Brazil, which allows the Company to consider as non-taxable income the Government grant related to the ICMS tax and (ii) $3.1 million gain for the effect of the changes in the statutory income tax in Argentina.
The income tax calculated at the tax rates applicable to profits in the respective countries in 2018 would represent a benefit of $2.9 million. The main adjustments to this amount are: (i) an adjustment of $5.8 million related to the application of IAS 29 on Shareholders' equity of our Argentine Subsidiaries; (ii) the recognition of unused tax losses for $ 4.1 million . and (iii) a loss of $2.2 million related to non deductible items and (ii) $2.2 million loss for the effect of the changes in the statutory income tax in Argentina.
Gain / (Loss )for the Year
As a result of the foregoing, our net income during 2019 increased $23.6 million, from a loss of $23.2 million in 2018 to a gain of $0.3 million in 2019.
Year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to year ended December 31, 2017
The following table sets forth certain financial information with respect to our consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | Chg (%) 2018 - 2017 |
| | (In thousands of $) | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 793,239 |
| | 933,178 |
| | (15.0 | )% |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (609,965 | ) | | (766,727 | ) | | (20.4 | )% |
| Initial recognition and Changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 16,195 |
| | 63,220 |
| | (74.4 | )% |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | (909 | ) | | 8,852 |
| | (110.3 | )% |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 198,560 |
| | 238,523 |
| | (16.8 | )% |
| General and administrative expenses | (56,080 | ) | | (57,299 | ) | | (2.1 | )% |
| Selling expenses | (90,215 | ) | | (95,399 | ) | | (5.4 | )% |
| Other operating income, net | 104,232 |
| | 39,461 |
| | 164.1 | % |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 156,497 |
| | 125,286 |
| | 24.9 | % |
| Finance income | 8,581 |
| | 11,744 |
| | (26.9 | )% |
| Finance costs | (271,263 | ) | | (131,349 | ) | | 106.5 | % |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 81,928 |
| | — |
| | 100.0 | % |
| Financial results, net | (180,754 | ) | | (119,605 | ) | | 51.1 | % |
| (Loss) / Profit Before Income Tax | (24,257 | ) | | 5,681 |
| | (527.0 | )% |
| Income tax Benefit / (Expense) | 1,024 |
| | 6,068 |
| | (83.1 | )% |
| (Loss) / Profit for the Year | (23,233 | ) | | 11,749 |
| | (297.7 | )% |
SalesCost of Goods and Services Rendered
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2018 | 155,418 |
| | 95,403 |
| | 29,710 |
| | 1,770 |
| | 510,938 |
| | 793,239 |
|
| 2017 | 197,222 |
| | 86,478 |
| | 37,523 |
| | 1,336 |
| | 610,619 |
| | 933,178 |
|
Total sales of goods and service rendered totaled $793.2 million, 15.0% less than in 2017, primarily as a result of:
Sales decreased $99.7 million in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, mainly due to: (i) 23.5% lower prices of sugar, from $371.6 per ton in 2017 to $284.3 per ton in 2018; (ii) a 8.3% decrease in the price of ethanol, from $549.6 per cubic meter in 2017 to $503.8 per cubic meter in 2018; (iii)a13.2% decrease in the volume of energy sold, from 860.8 MWh in 2017 to 747.2 MWh in 2018; and (iv) a 2.5% decrease in the volume of sugar and ethanol sold, measured in TRS (Total Recoverable Sugar), from 1.60 million tons in 2017 to 1.56 million tons in 2018. The decrease in volume of sugar and ethanol sold was due to inventories build-up, of 48.8 thousand tons measured in TRS during 2018 compared to an inventories sell-off of 36.4 thousand tons measured in TRS in 2017. This was partially offset by a 11.8% increase year-over-year in sugarcane milled, from 10.2 million tons during 2017 to 11.4 million tons in 2018 due to (i) a 2.7% increase in milling per hour from 2,074 tons per hour in 2017 to 2,130 tons per hour in 2018 due to enhancements and investments at industrial level in concordance with the long term plan of the company; (ii) increase in effective milling days from 221 days in 2017, to 231 days in 2018, due to adequate weather conditions; and (iii) a 4.9% increase in sugarcane yields, from 85.1 tons per hectare in 2017 to 89.3 tons per hectare in 2018, that ensured cane availability.
The decrease in volume of energy sold was due to (a) lower third parties energy purchases from 167.0 MWh during 2017 to 72.0 MWh for 2018; (b) a 10.8% decrease in cogeneration efficiency, from 69.6 MWh per ton during 2017, to 62.1 MWh per ton in 2018, which is primarily dueequal to the fact that: (i) energy consumption in the Angelica mill was higher as a resultvalue of the increase in crushing capacity; (ii) during 2018 we adopted a strategy to redirect steam to maximize the production of
ethanol, that consumes more energy. This decrease was partially offset by a 7.1% increase in energy prices, from $72.3 per MWh during 2017, to $77.4 per MWh in 2018.
The following figure sets forth the variables that determine our SugarSales and Ethanol sales:
| |
(1) | On average, one metric ton of sugarcane contains 140 kilograms of TRS. While a mill can produce either sugar or ethanol, the TRS input requirements differ between these two products. On average, 1.045 kilograms of TRS equivalent are required to produce 1.0 kilogram of sugar, while the amount of TRS required to produce 1 liter of ethanol is 1.691 kilograms |
The following figure sets forth the variables that determine our Energy sales:
The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales of manufactured products for the years indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | Chg % | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Chg % | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Chg % |
| | (in millions of $) | | (in thousand units) | | (in dollars per unit) |
| Ethanol (M3) | 324.7 |
| | 241.7 |
| | 34.3 | % | | 644.4 |
| | 439.7 |
| | 46.6 | % | | 503.8 |
| | 549.6 |
| | (8.3 | )% |
| Sugar (tons) | 128.4 |
| | 305.7 |
| | (58.0 | )% | | 451.5 |
| | 822.6 |
| | (45.1 | )% | | 284.3 |
| | 371.6 |
| | (23.5 | )% |
| Energy (MWh) | 57.8 |
| | 62.2 |
| | (7.1 | )% | | 747.2 |
| | 860.8 |
| | (13.2 | )% | | 77.4 |
| | 72.3 |
| | 7.1 | % |
| Others | 0.1 |
| | 1.1 |
| | (90.9 | )% | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| TOTAL | 510.9 |
| | 610.6 |
| | (16.3 | )% | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Sales decreased $41.8 million in our Crops segment mainly driven by: (i) a $9.1 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations; (ii) a 6.5% decrease in the volume of soybean sold, from 282.5 thousand tons in 2017 to 264.1 thousand tons in 2018; and (iii) a 59.5% decrease in the volume of corn sold, from 599.1 thousand tons in 2017 to 242.5 thousand tons in 2018. The decrease in the volume of soybean and corn sold was mainly driven by lower yields, from 2.7 tons per hectare in 2017 to 2.1 tons per hectare in 2018 for soybean and from 5.4 tons per hectare in 2017 to 4.2 tons per hectare in 2018 for corn. Variation in yields was caused by dry weather conditions during January and March of 2018, which is the critical period for water requirement and development of the crops, affecting mainly north and center regions of Argentina, and Uruguay. This decrease was partially offset by (i) higher sales volumes of wheat, from 103.6 thousand tons in 2017 to 174.5 thousand tons in 2018; (ii) higher prices of soybean, from $302.7 per ton in 2017 to $318.9 per ton in 2018 due to higher proportion of FOB sales; (iii) higher prices of corn, from $143.9 per ton in 2017, to $159.3 per ton in 2018; and (iv) greater selling prices of wheat, from $161.5 per ton in 2017 to $187.4 per ton in 2018.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales of manufactured products for the years indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Chg | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Chg | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Chg |
| | (In millions of $) | | (In thousands of tons) | | (In $ per ton) |
| Soybean | 84.2 |
| | 85.5 |
| | (1.5 | )% | | 264.1 |
| | 282.5 |
| | (6.5 | )% | | 318.9 |
| | 302.7 |
| | 5.4 | % |
| Corn (1) | 38.6 |
| | 86.2 |
| | (55.2 | )% | | 242.5 |
| | 599.1 |
| | (59.5 | )% | | 159.3 |
| | 143.9 |
| | 10.7 | % |
| Wheat (2) | 32.7 |
| | 16.7 |
| | 95.8 | % | | 174.5 |
| | 103.6 |
| | 68.4 | % | | 187.4 |
| | 161.5 |
| | 16.0 | % |
| Others | 9.0 |
| | 8.7 |
| | 3.4 | % | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Adjustments | (9.1 | ) | | | | N/A |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | 155.4 |
| | 197.2 |
| | (21.2 | )% | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| |
(1) | Includes sorghum, popcorn and peanut. |
Sales decreased $7.8 million in our Dairy segment mainly caused by (i) a $3.5 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations; (ii) a 20% decrease in fluid milk prices from $0.35 per liter in 2017 to $0.28 per liter in 2018 due to sharp depreciation of the Argentine peso; and (iii) 0.4 thousand tons of powder milk stock build-up during 2018. This decrease was partially offset by (a) higher milk production volumes, from 93.2 million liters in 2017 to 101.3 million liters in 2018 and (b) the $1.8 million derived from electricity sales during 2018 compared to no sales in 2017 as we started to deliver energy from the new bio-digester that transforms effluents from our free stalls into renewal electricity. Higher milk production was due to 8.8% increase in milking cows from 6,967 cows in 2017 to 7,581 cows in 2018, as we finished the construction of our third free stall and started populating it since September 2018.
This was partially offset by:
Sales increased $8.9 million in our Rice segment, mainly due to (i) a 29.6% increase in the volume of white rice sold, from 140.5 thousand tons during 2017 to 182.1 thousand tons in 2018; and (ii) a 8.8% increase in the sale of by products, from $17.1 million during 2017 to $18.6 million in 2018. The increase in the volume of white rice sold is mainly due to (a) a 16.9% increase in rice yields, from 5.9 tons per hectare during 2017 to 6.9 tons per hectare in 2018, and (b) a 10.2% increase in industrial efficiency and rice quality, which allowed us to transform 1.77 tons of rough rice into 1 ton of white rice during 2017, and 1.59 tons of rough rice into 1 ton of white rice in 2018. The increase in volumes sold were partially offset by (i) a reduction in average selling prices from $493.8 per ton in 2017 to $447.3 per ton in 2018; and (ii) a $4.6 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations.
Services Rendered. The profit of our agricultural producethese products is fully recognized under the line items “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest”.harvest.” When the agricultural produce is sold to third parties, we do not record any additional profit as the gain or loss hadhas already been recognized.
The profitIn the case of our manufactured products sold to third parties (i.e., sugar, ethanol, energy, white rice, processed milk and peanut), the profit is recognized when they are sold. The costCost of manufacturedGoods and Services Rendered of these products includes, among others, the cost of the agricultural produce (i.e., harvested sugarcane and rough rice), which is the raw material used in the industrial process and is transferred internally from the farm to the industry at fair market value.
Cost of manufactured products sold, and services rendered increased 39.7%, from $611.9 million during the twelve-month
period ended December 31, 2020, to $855 million during the same period in 2021. This increase was primarily due to:
•a $97.6 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, mainly due to a 49.5% higher unitary cost in dollar terms mainly affected by the increase in sugarcane prices.
•a $64.0 million increase in our Crops segment, mainly due the increase in Sales of Goods and Services Rendered coupled with a positive impact of $1.5 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $10.1 million during the same period in 2021.
•a $42.1 million increase in our Dairy segment, explained by (i) an increase in volume of processed milk sold by our industrial facilities in Morteros and Chivilcoy; and (ii) a positive impact of $1.7 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $8.3 million during the same period in 2021.
•a $38.2 million increase in our Rice segment, mainly explained by a 33.2% higher unitary cost due to higher rough rice prices, coupled with an increase in the volume of white rice sold and a positive impact of $0.6 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $2.3 million during the same period in 2021.
Initial Recognition and Changes in Fair Value of Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | 73,990 | | | 43,834 | | | 19,895 | | | 1,362 | | | 88,659 | | | 227,740 | |
| 2020 | 40,104 | | | 18,677 | | | 12,344 | | | 1,256 | | | 50,348 | | | 122,729 | |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value (i.e.of biological assets and agricultural produce increased 85.6%, from $122.7
million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to $227.7 million during the same period in 2021. The increase was mainly due to:
•A $38.3 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment from $50.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $19.7 million were unrealized gains) to a gain of $88.7 million during the same period in 2021 (which includes $16.3 million of unrealized losses). This increase was mainly due to:
-A $69.4 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested sugarcane, roughfrom a gain of $29.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $99.3 million during the same period in 2021 driven by an increase in sugarcane prices.
Partially offset by:
-A $35.6 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested sugarcane, from a gain of $19.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a loss of $15.9 million in the same period in 2021, mainly by a decrease in expected yields as a consequence of the negative impact of the frost in our unharvested cane.
•A $33.9 million increase in our Crops segment from $40.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $29.6 million were realized gains) to $74 million during the same period in 2021 (of which $51.3 million were realized gains). This increase is primarily due to:
- The recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested crops at the point of harvest, increased $23.9 million, from a gain of $39.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $63.4 million during the same period in 2021, mainly due by an increase in average selling prices.
- A negative impact of $0.9 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $8.3 million during the same period in 2021.
•A $25.1 million increase in our Rice segment, from $18.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $15.5 million were realized gains) to $43.8 million during the same period in 2021 (of which $33 million were realized gains). This increase is due to:
-A $19.4 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested rice fluid milk, etc).at the point of harvest, from a gain of $17.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $36.6 million during the same period in 2021, mainly explained by 16.4% increase in yields, a 6.6% increase in planted area coupled with higher prices.
- A negative impact of $0.8 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $6.7 million during the same period in 2021.
•A $7.6 million increase in our Dairy segment, from $12.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $17.8 million were realized) to $19.9 million during the same period in 2021 (of which $24.6 million were realized), mainly due to:
-A $6.8 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of realized production, from $17.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to $24.6 million in the same period in 2021, mainly due to an increase in the number of cows and an increase in cow productivity.
-A negative impact of $0.3 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $1.6 million in the same period in 2021.
Changes in Net Realizable Value of Agricultural Produce after Harvest
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (11,384) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,495) | | | (12,879) | |
| 2020 | 7,007 | | | — | | | (2) | | | — | | | — | | | 7,005 | |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest is mainly composed by: (i) profit or loss from commodity price fluctuations during the period the agricultural produce is in inventory, which impacts its fair value; (ii) profit or loss from the valuation of forward contracts related to agricultural produce in inventory; and (iii) profit from direct exports.
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest decreased from a gain of $7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a loss of $12.9 million during the same period in 2021, as a result of decrease of crops prices after harvest which impacted in a lower fair value of our crops held in inventories during year ended on December 31, 2021, compared to a higher fair value of our crops held in inventories during the same period in 2020.
Cost of Goods Sold and Services Rendered
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2018 | (156,936 | ) | | (74,973 | ) | | (28,127 | ) | | (1,313 | ) | | (348,616 | ) | | (609,965 | ) |
| 2017 | (196,302 | ) | | (71,087 | ) | | (36,979 | ) | | (853 | ) | | (461,506 | ) | | (766,727 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (213,231) | | | (112,045) | | | (158,077) | | | (3,111) | | | (368,501) | | | (854,965) | |
| 2020 | (149,250) | | | (73,830) | | | (116,007) | | | (1,962) | | | (270,897) | | | (611,946) | |
In the case of our agricultural produce sold to third parties (i.e., soybean, corn, wheat and fluid milk), the value of Cost of Goods and Services Rendered is equal to the value of Sales and Services Rendered. The profit of these products is fully recognized under the line items “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest.” When the agricultural produce is sold to third parties, we do not record any additional profit or loss as the gain or loss has already been recognized.
In the case of our manufactured products sold to third parties (i.e., sugar, ethanol, energy, white rice, processed milk and white rice)peanut), the profit is recognized when they are sold. The Cost of Goods and Services Rendered of these products includes, among others, the cost of the agricultural produce (i.e., harvested sugarcane and rough rice), which is the raw material used in the industrial process and is transferred internally from the farm to the industry at fair market value.
Cost of manufactured products sold, and services rendered totaled $610.0increased 39.7%, from $611.9 million 20.4% less than 2017.during the twelve-month
period ended December 31, 2020, to $855 million during the same period in 2021. This decreaseincrease was primarily due to:
•a $112.9$97.6 million decreaseincrease in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, mainly due to: (i) the 2.6% decrease in the volume
of sugar and ethanol sold measured in TRS; and (ii)to a 22.4% lower49.5% higher unitary cost in dollar terms due to (a)mainly affected by the 10.9% increase in sugarcane milling, which diluted fixed cost per tons; (b) depreciation of the Brazilian Real in 2018 compared to 2017; and (c) prices.
•a 47.9% decrease in third parties' purchase of sugarcane, which has a higher cost, from 1.2$64.0 million tons during 2017 to 0.6 million tons in 2018.
a $39.4 million decreaseincrease in our Crops segment, mainly due to the decreaseincrease in Sales of Goods and Services Rendered.Rendered coupled with a positive impact of $1.5 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $10.1 million during the same period in 2021.
•a $8.9$42.1 million decreaseincrease in our Dairy segment, mainly dueexplained by (i) an increase in volume of processed milk sold by our industrial facilities in Morteros and Chivilcoy; and (ii) a positive impact of $1.7 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $8.3 million during the decreasesame period in Sales of Goods and Services Rendered.2021.
These figures were partially offset by:
•a $3.9$38.2 million increase in our Rice segment, mainly due to the 29.6% increase in volume sold, partially offsetexplained by 18.6% lowera 33.2% higher unitary costs, from $506.1 per ton in 2017 to $411.8 per ton in 2018,cost due to higher yieldsrough rice prices, coupled with an increase in the volume of white rice sold and depreciationa positive impact of the Argentine Peso, coupled with$0.6 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations.operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a negative impact of $2.3 million during the same period in 2021.
Initial Recognition and Changes in Fair Value of Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | 73,990 | | | 43,834 | | | 19,895 | | | 1,362 | | | 88,659 | | | 227,740 | |
| 2020 | 40,104 | | | 18,677 | | | 12,344 | | | 1,256 | | | 50,348 | | | 122,729 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2018 | 28,667 |
| | 4,125 |
| | 5,455 |
| | (1,199 | ) | | (20,853 | ) | | 16,195 |
|
| 2017 | 17,158 |
| | 10,236 |
| | 11,769 |
| | 267 |
| | 23,790 |
| | 63,220 |
|
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce totaled $ 16.2 increased 85.6%, from $122.7
million 74.4% less than 2017. This decreaseduring the year ended December 31, 2020, to $227.7 million during the same period in 2021. The increase was primarilymainly due to:
•A $44.6$38.3 million decreaseincrease in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment from a gain of $23.8$50.3 million in 2017during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $2.9$19.7 million were unrealized gains) to a lossgain of $20.9$88.7 million during 2018the same period in 2021 (which includes $37.8$16.3 million of unrealized losses). This decreaseincrease was mainly due to:
-A $40.7$69.4 million decrease in the recognition of fair value minus the cost of sell of non-harvested sugarcane, from $2.9 million in 2017 to a loss of $37.8 million in 2018, which was mainly generated by a decrease in projected yields as a result of below average rainfalls during the last quarter of 2018, coupled with a decrease in projected sugar prices.
- A $3.9 million decreaseincrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested sugarcane, from $20.9 million in 2017 to $16.9a gain of $29.9 million during 2018 duethe year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $99.3 million during the decreasesame period in sugar2021 driven by an increase in sugarcane prices.
a $6.3Partially offset by:
-A $35.6 million decrease in our Dairy segment , mainly due to the decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of fluid milk,non-harvested sugarcane, from $11.8a gain of $19.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a loss of $15.9 million in 2017the same period in 2021, mainly by a decrease in expected yields as a consequence of the negative impact of the frost in our unharvested cane.
•A $33.9 million increase in our Crops segment from $40.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $9.9$29.6 million were realized)realized gains) to $5.5$74 million during the same period in 20182021 (of which $7.9$51.3 million were realized), mainlyrealized gains). This increase is primarily due to (i) 18.3% lower fluid milk prices; and (ii) a $4.0 million lower cow valuation due to effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations. This decrease was partially offset by the 8.8% increase in milking cows from an average of 6,967 heads in 2017, to an average of 7,581 heads in 2018, which are used to populate free-stall #3.to:
a $6.1 million decrease in our Rice segment, from $10.2 million during 2017 (of which $ 4.9 million were realized) to $4.1 million in 2018 (of which $9.1 million were realized), due to (i) a decrease of $4.8 million caused by effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations; and (ii) lower- The recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested rice,harvested crops at the point of harvest, increased $23.9 million, from a gain of $3.7$39.5 million in 2017during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a lossgain of $3.9$63.4 million during the same period in 2018,2021, mainly explaineddue by normalization of expected yields in comparison with exceptional weather conditions for rice harvest during 2017/2018.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $11.5 millionan increase in our Crops segment from $17.2 million in 2017 (of which $4.4 million were unrealized) to $28.7 million during 2018 (of which $8.2 million were unrealized). This increase is primarily due to:average selling prices.
- An increaseA negative impact of $23.4 million in the recognition of fair value minus the cost of sell of harvested crops, from $15.2 million in 2017 to $38.6 million in 2018, mainly due to lower production costs in dollar terms, due to the depreciation of the Argentine Peso, partially offset by; (i) a $7.8$0.9 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations;operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $8.3 million during the same period in 2021.
•A $25.1 million increase in our Rice segment, from $18.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $15.5 million were realized gains) to $43.8 million during the same period in 2021 (of which $33 million were realized gains). This increase is due to:
-A $19.4 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of harvested rice at the point of harvest, from a gain of $17.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $36.6 million during the same period in 2021, mainly explained by 16.4% increase in yields, a 6.6% increase in planted area coupled with higher prices.
- A negative impact of $0.8 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and (ii) lower grain production.translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $6.7 million during the same period in 2021.
•A $7.6 million increase in our Dairy segment, from $12.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which $17.8 million were realized) to $19.9 million during the same period in 2021 (of which $24.6 million were realized), mainly due to:
-A $6.8 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of realized production, from $17.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to $24.6 million in the same period in 2021, mainly due to an increase in the number of cows and an increase in cow productivity.
-A negative impact of $0.3 million effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation for our Argentine operations during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a positive impact of $1.6 million in the same period in 2021.
Changes in Net Realizable Value of Agricultural Produce after Harvest
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2018 | (909 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (909 | ) |
| 2017 | 8,852 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,852 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (11,384) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,495) | | | (12,879) | |
| 2020 | 7,007 | | | — | | | (2) | | | — | | | — | | | 7,005 | |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest is mainly composed by: (i) profit or loss from commodity price fluctuations during the period of time the agricultural produce is in inventory, which impacts its fair value; (ii) profit or loss from the valuation of forward contracts related to agricultural produce in inventory; and (iii) profit from direct exports.
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest totaled negative $0.9decreased from a gain of $7 million $9.8 less than 2017. Thisduring the year ended December 31, 2020, to a loss of $12.9 million during the same period in 2021, as a result is mainly explained byof decrease of crops prices after harvest which impacted in a lower gains from the valuationfair value of our agricultural producecrops held in inventories.inventories during year ended on December 31, 2021, compared to a higher fair value of our crops held in inventories during the same period in 2020.
General and Administrative ExpenseExpenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | | | Corporate | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (11,100) | | | (9,760) | | | (5,256) | | | (187) | | | (19,464) | | | | | (24,027) | | | (69,794) | |
| 2020 | (6,694) | | | (6,899) | | | (4,788) | | | (118) | | | (15,942) | | | | | (18,983) | | | (53,428) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2018 | (4,202 | ) | | (5,939 | ) | | (2,280 | ) | | (164 | ) | | (25,302 | ) | | (18,193 | ) | | (56,080 | ) |
| 2017 | (2,981 | ) | | (4,699 | ) | | (1,058 | ) | | (174 | ) | | (26,806 | ) | | (21,581 | ) | | (57,299 | ) |
Our general and administrative expenses totaled $56.1increased 30.7%, from $53.4 million 2.1% less than 2017. The decreaseduring the year ended December 31, 2020, to $69.8 million during the same period in 2021. This increase is mainly explained as a result of theby higher expenses in Sugar, Ethanol and Energy, Corporate and Crops segments mainly explained by higher salaries bonuses in dollar terms, coupled with higher depreciation of the Brazilian Real and the Argentine peso, which was partially offset by the effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations, which generated an increase in depreciation expenses for Crops, Rice and Dairy segments.expenses.
Selling Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Corporate | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (23,419) | | | (18,108) | | | (22,572) | | | (290) | | | (52,946) | | | (327) | | | (117,662) | |
| 2020 | (17,998) | | | (13,923) | | | (13,540) | | | (214) | | | (49,188) | | | (195) | | | (95,058) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2018 | (5,447 | ) | | (14,090 | ) | | (942 | ) | | (149 | ) | | (69,442 | ) | | (145 | ) | | (90,215 | ) |
| 2017 | (7,501 | ) | | (13,324 | ) | | (711 | ) | | (156 | ) | | (73,664 | ) | | (43 | ) | | (95,399 | ) |
Selling expenses totaled $90.2increased 23.8%, from $95.1 million 5.4% less than 2017.during the year ended December 31, 2020, to $117.7 million during the same period in 2021. This decreaseincrease is explained by:
•a $9 million increase in Dairy segment, due to higher export taxes due to higher export selling volume.
•a $5.4 million increase in the Crops business due to higher export taxes due to higher export selling volume.
•a $4.2 million increase in Rice segment, due to higher export taxes due to higher export selling volume.
Other Operating Income, Net
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| (In thousands of $) |
| 2021 | (3,723) | | | 285 | | | (170) | | | (4,465) | | | (17,390) | | | 6,613 | | | 82 | | | (18,768) | |
| 2020 | (12,853) | | | 713 | | | (186) | | | 1,067 | | | 5,495 | | | 7,920 | | | (169) | | | 1,987 | |
Other operating income decreased from a gain of $2 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a loss of $18.8 million during the same period in 2021, primarily due to:
•a $22.9 million decrease in theour Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment due tomainly explained by a gain of $5.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, explained by the decrease in sales ofprices, which generated a positive effect in our sugar and ethanolhedge positions, compared to a loss during the same period in 2021 explained by 2.6% measuredthe increase in TRS, coupled with depreciation of the Brazilian Realprices which generated a negative effect in 2018.our sugar hedge positions.
•a $2.1$5.5 million decrease in our Crops segment, dueAll Other Segments related to (i) a 16.6% decrease in total segment sales; (ii) no direct exports realized during 2018, compared to 83.7 thousand tons of corn exported in 2017, which generated $0.7 million fobbing costs; and (iii) by effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations.
These decreases were partially offset by:
$0.8 million increase in our Rice segment, due to a 29.6% increase in white rice sales, partially offset by effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations.
Other Operating Income, Net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
| 2018 | 7,163 |
| | 217 |
| | (997 | ) | | 13,396 |
| | 48,357 |
| | 36,227 |
| | (131 | ) | | 104,232 |
|
| 2017 | 7,719 |
| | 724 |
| | 662 |
| | (23 | ) | | 30,419 |
| | — |
| | (40 | ) | | 39,461 |
|
Other operating income increased 138.2%, from $43.8 million in 2017, to $104.2 million during 2018, primarily due to:
a $36.2 million increase in our Land Transformation segment due to the sale of the "Rio de Janeiro" and "Conquista" farms, located in Brazil, for a total consideration of $53.0 million for 9,300 croppable hectares.
a $17.9 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol & Energy segment mainly explained by the mark-to-market effect of our sugar hedge positions.
a $9.1 million increase in all other segments related tolower net gains from the fair value adjustment of investmentInvestment property, composed of own farms under lease agreements coupled with $2.7(i.e., beef cattle farms).
Partially offset by a $9.1 million increase byin our Crops segment due to the mark-to-market effect of hyperinflation accountingour soybean and corn hedge positions.
and translation in 2018 for our Argentine operations.
Financial Results, Net
Our net financial results, net decreased from a loss of $119.6$175.7 million in 2017during the year ended December 31, 2020, to a loss of $180.8$103.5 million during 2018.the same period in 2021. This was mainly due to a 373.3% increasedecrease in foreign exchange losses causedfrom a loss of $109.3 million during year ended December 31, 2020, to a gain of $18.9 million during the same period in 2021, mainly explained by a depreciation in(a) the Argentine Peso, which increased from 17% in 2017 to 102.3% in 2018, and the higher30% depreciation of the Brazilian Real which increased from 6% in 2017during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to a 17.2%7.7% depreciation of the Brazilian Real during the same period in 2018. Both effects produced foreign exchange losses2021; and (b) a 40.4% depreciation of $183.2 million in 2018the Argentine peso during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to lossesa 22.1% depreciation of $38.7 millionthe Argentine Peso during the same period in 2017. This loss was partially offset by an increase of $81.9 million due to the effect of hyperinflation accounting and translation.2021.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of financial results for the yearsperiods indicated.
| | | | Year ended December 31, | | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | | | 2021 | | 2020 | | |
| | (In $ thousand) | | % Change | | (In $ thousand) | | % Change |
| Interest income | 7,915 |
| | 11,230 |
| | (29.5 | )% | Interest income | 4,081 | | | 4,084 | | | (0.1) | % |
| Interest expense | (51,577 | ) | | (52,308 | ) | | (1.4 | )% | Interest expense | (62,536) | | | (58,282) | | | 7.3 | % |
| Foreign exchange losses, net | (183,195 | ) | | (38,708 | ) | | 373.3 | % | |
| Finance Cost - Right-of-use Assets | | Finance Cost - Right-of-use Assets | (16,502) | | | (12,532) | | | 31.7 | % |
| Foreign exchange gain/(losses), net | | Foreign exchange gain/(losses), net | 18,939 | | | (109,266) | | | (117.3) | % |
| Cash flow hedge – transfer from equity | (26,693 | ) | | (20,758 | ) | | 28.6 | % | Cash flow hedge – transfer from equity | (52,650) | | | (24,363) | | | 116.1 | % |
| Loss from interest rate /foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments | (3,024 | ) | | (2,163 | ) | | 39.8 | % | |
| Gain from interest rate /foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments | | Gain from interest rate /foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments | 512 | | | 92 | | | 456.5 | % |
| Taxes | | Taxes | (7,073) | | | (4,559) | | | 55.1 | % |
| Other Income | | Other Income | 218 | | | 17,104 | | | (98.7) | % |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 81,928 |
| | — |
| | 100.0 | % | Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 11,541 | | | 12,064.496 | | | (4.3) | % |
| Taxes | (3,136 | ) | | (3,705 | ) | | (15.4 | )% | |
| Other Expenses | (2,972 | ) | | (13,193 | ) | | (77.5 | )% | |
| Total Financial Results | (180,754 | ) | | (119,605 | ) | | 51.1 | % | Total Financial Results | (103,470) | | | (175,659) | | | (41.1) | % |
Income Tax (expense) / benefit
Current income tax benefit totaled a gainan expense of $1.0$43.8 million in 2018, which equates2021, compared to a consolidated effective tax rate of 4.2%. For the fiscal year 2017, we registered an$12.3 million in 2020.
The income tax gaincalculated at the applicable tax rates to profits in the respective countries in 2021 would be $54.3 million expense. The main adjustments to this amount are: (i) $6.4 million related to the application of $5.0 million. In 2018, we recordedIAS 29 on shareholders’ equity of our Argentine Subsidiaries; (ii) $32.0 million loss for the effect of the changes in the statutory income tax in Argentina and (iii) $3.5 million related to non-deductible items. These effects were partially offset by (i) the recognition of unused tax losses for $38.1 million, mainly in Argentine subsidiaries, which relates to the Tax inflation adjustment (See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements); (ii) non-taxable income in the amount of $13.0$13.6 million mainly related to a Complementary Law in Brazil, which allows the Company to consider as non-taxable income the Government grant related to the ICMS tax.
The income tax calculated at the applicable tax rates to profits in the respective countries in 2020 would be $4.2 million expense. The main adjustments to this amount are: (i) $19.2 million related to the application of IAS 29 on Shareholders’ equity of our Argentine Subsidiaries; (ii) the recognition of unused tax losses of $ 0.7 million and (iii) $7.6 million related to non-deductible items. These effects were partially offset by (i) non-taxable income in the amount of $11.0 million related to a Complementary Law in Brazil, which allows the Company to consider as non-taxable income the Government grant related to the ICMS tax as non-taxable income. Thisand (ii) $6.3 million gain for the effect was partially offset by an adjustment of $5.8 million related to the effects of the application of IAS 29 on Argentina Shareholders' equity. In 2017,changes in the effectivestatutory income tax rate was 50.0% based on non-deductible expenses in Brazil and Uruguay for an amount of 1.4 million.Argentina.
Profit / (Loss) for the Year
As a result of the foregoing, our net income during 2018 decreased $38.2total in 2021 and 2020 increased $130.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020, COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 for a comparative discussion for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Reconciliation of non-IFRS measures:
Below are reconciliations of non-IFRS measures related to our income statements. See “Presentation of Financial And Other Information—Non-IFRS Financial Measures.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) (1) | | | | | | | | | |
| Crops | 52,052 | | | 35,694 | | | 25,654 | | | | | |
| Rice | 40,746 | | | 34,108 | | | 20,328 | | | | | |
| Dairy | 22,901 | | | 18,153 | | | 14,965 | | | | | |
| All Other segments | 1,522 | | | 1,620 | | | 266 | | | | | |
| Farming subtotal | 117,221 | | | 89,575 | | | 61,213 | | | | | |
| Ethanol, sugar and energy | 334,854 | | | 253,052 | | | 253,069 | | | | | |
| Land transformation | 6,613 | | | 18,132 | | | 10,526 | | | | | |
| Corporate | (21,584) | | | (18,806) | | | (19,639) | | | | | |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited) (1) | 437,104 | | | 341,953 | | | 305,169 | | | | | |
The following tables show a reconciliation of Adjusted Segment EBITDA to our segments’ profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation, the most directly comparable IFRS financial measure, and a gainreconciliation of $15.0 millionAdjusted Consolidated EBITDA to our net profit (loss) for the year, the most directly comparable IFRS financial measure.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2021 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Farming
Subtotal | | Sugar,
Ethanol
and
Energy | | Land
Trans-
formation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA
(unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Profit/(Loss) from
Operations Before Financing and Taxation as per Segment Information | 45,551 | | | 32,666 | | | 15,757 | | | (2,537) | | | 91,437 | | | 190,873 | | | 6,613 | | | (22,322) | | | 266,601 | |
| Net loss from Fair value adjustment of investment property as per Segment Information | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,884 | | | 3,884 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,884 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(1) | 45,551 | | | 32,666 | | | 15,757 | | | 1,347 | | | 95,321 | | | 190,873 | | | 6,613 | | | (22,322) | | | 270,485 | |
| Depreciation of Property, plant and equipment and amortization of Intangible Assets as per Segment Information | 6,501 | | | 8,080 | | | 7,144 | | | 175 | | | 21,900 | | | 143,981 | | | — | | | 738 | | | 166,619 | |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | 52,052 | | | 40,746 | | | 22,901 | | | 1,522 | | | 117,221 | | | 334,854 | | | 6,613 | | | (21,584) | | | 437,104 | |
| Reconciliation to Profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Profit for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 130,717 | |
| Income tax expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 43,837 | |
| Interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 58,455 | |
| Foreign exchange, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (18,939) | |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (11,541) | |
| Other financial results, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 75,495 | |
| Combined effects of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries of Profit from operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (11,423) | |
| Net loss from Fair value adjustment of investment property as per Segment Information | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,884 | |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited) (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 270,485 | |
| Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment and amortization of Intangible Assets as per Segment Information | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 166,619 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 437,104 | |
(1)See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of "Adjusted Segment EBIT,” "Adjusted Consolidated EBIT,” "Adjusted Segment EBITDA" and "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2020 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Farming
Subtotal | | Sugar,
Ethanol
and
Energy | | Land
Trans-
formation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA
(unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Profit/(Loss) from
Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 29,558 | | | 27,456 | | | 11,444 | | | 2,562 | | | 71,020 | | | 131,275 | | | 7,934 | | | (19,682) | | | 190,547 | |
| Net (gain) from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,080) | | | (1,080) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,080) | |
| Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10,198 | | | — | | | 10,198 | |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(1) | 29,558 | | | 27,456 | | | 11,444 | | | 1,482 | | | 69,940 | | | 131,275 | | | 18,132 | | | (19,682) | | | 199,665 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 5,397 | | | 6,652 | | | 6,709 | | | 138 | | | 18,896 | | | 122,516 | | | — | | | 876 | | | 142,288 | |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | 34,955 | | | 34,108 | | | 18,153 | | | 1,620 | | | 88,836 | | | 253,791 | | | 18,132 | | | (18,806) | | | 341,953 | |
| Reconciliation to Profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Profit for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,070 | |
| Income tax expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12,325 | |
| Interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 54,198 | |
| Foreign exchange, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 109,266 | |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (12,064) | |
| Other financial results, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,258 | |
| Combined effects of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries of Profit from operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,494 | |
| Net (gain) from Fair value adjustment of investment property | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,080) | |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 189,467 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 142,288 | |
| Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10,198 | |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 341,953 | |
(1)See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of "Adjusted Segment EBIT,” "Adjusted Consolidated EBIT,” "Adjusted Segment EBITDA" and "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2019 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Farming
Subtotal | | Sugar,
Ethanol
and
Energy | | Land
Trans-
formation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA
(unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Profit/(Loss) from
Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 20,992 | | | 13,334 | | | 9,901 | | | (842) | | | 43,385 | | | 95,412 | | | 2,504 | | | (19,659) | | | 121,642 | |
| Net loss from fair value adjustment of investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | 927 | | | 927 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 927 | |
| Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 8,022 | | | — | | | 8,022 | |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(1) | 20,992 | | | 13,334 | | | 9,901 | | | 85 | | | 44,312 | | | 95,412 | | | 10,526 | | | (19,659) | | | 130,591 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 4,662 | | | 6,994 | | | 5,064 | | | 181 | | | 16,901 | | | 157,697 | | | — | | | — | | | 174,598 | |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | 25,654 | | | 20,328 | | | 14,965 | | | 266 | | | 61,213 | | | 253,109 | | | 10,526 | | | (19,659) | | | 305,189 | |
| Reconciliation to Profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 342 | |
| Income tax benefit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 20,820 | |
| Interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,078 | |
| Foreign exchange, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 25,779 | |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (16,911) | |
| Other financial results, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 41,275 | |
| Combined effects of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries of Profit from operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 259 | |
| Net loss from fair value adjustment of investment property | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 927 | |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 122,569 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 174,598 | |
| Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,022 | |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 305,189 | |
(1)See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of "Adjusted Segment EBIT,” "Adjusted Consolidated EBIT,” "Adjusted Segment EBITDA" and "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | | | |
| Net cash generated from operating activities | 348,662 | | | 257,125 | | | 322,110 | | | | | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (175,221) | | | (121,916) | | | (249,639) | | | | | |
| Interest paid | (53,587) | | | (60,026) | | | (53,996) | | | | | |
| Lease payments | (62,273) | | | (40,336) | | | (49,081) | | | | | |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interest | (311) | | | (2,447) | | | (905) | | | | | |
| Reversal of Expansion Capital expenditures (unaudited) | 58,030 | | | 56,719 | | | 129,074 | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for operating Activities | 30,666 | | | 14,956 | | | (23,550) | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for investing Activities | 4,694 | | | 429 | | | (2,922) | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for Interest Paid | 1,109 | | | 1,639 | | | (4,408) | | | | | |
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow from Operations (unaudited) | 151,769 | | | 106,143 | | | 71,091 | | | | | |
| Expansion Capital expenditures (unaudited) | (58,030) | | | (56,719) | | | (129,074) | | | | | |
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow (unaudited) | 93,739 | | | 49,424 | | | (57,983) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Indebtedness | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | | | |
| Net Debt (unaudited) | 617,885 | | | 634,808 | | | 678,004 | | | | | |
| Net Debt / Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited) | 1.41 x | | 1.86 x | | 2.22 x | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reconciliation - Net Debt | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | | | |
| Total Borrowings | 817,651 | | | 971,090 | | | 968,280 | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (199,766) | | | (336,282) | | | (290,276) | | | | | |
| Net Debt (unaudited) | 617,885 | | | 634,808 | | | 678,004 | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Adjusted Free Cash Flow to Net increase/(decrease) in 2017Cash and Cash Equivalents
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | | | |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (129,692) | | | 81,290 | | | 34,608 | | | | | |
| Interest Paid | (53,587) | | | (60,026) | | | (53,996) | | | | | |
| Lease Payments | (62,273) | | | (40,336) | | | (49,081) | | | | | |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interest (*) | (311) | | | (2,447) | | | (905) | | | | | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | 303,133 | | | 53,919 | | | 37,863 | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for operating activities | 30,666 | | | 14,956 | | | (23,550) | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for investing activities | 4,694 | | | 429 | | | (2,922) | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for interest paid | 1,109 | | | 1,639 | | | (4,408) | | | | | |
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow (unaudited) | 93,739 | | | 49,424 | | | (57,983) | | | | | |
(*) Dividends paid to a lossnon-controlling interest were considered retroactively in 2020 and 2019.
Reconciliation of $23.2 millionAdjusted Free Cash Flow from operations to Net increase/(decrease) in 2018.Cash and Cash Equivalents
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | | | |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (129,692) | | | 81,290 | | | 34,608 | | | | | |
| Expansion Capital Expenditures (unaudited) | 58,030 | | | 56,719 | | | 129,074 | | | | | |
| Interest Paid | (53,587) | | | (60,026) | | | (53,996) | | | | | |
| Lease payments | (62,273) | | | (40,336) | | | (49,081) | | | | | |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interest (*) | (311) | | | (2,447) | | | (905) | | | | | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | 303,133 | | | 53,919 | | | 37,863 | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for operating activities | 30,666 | | | 14,956 | | | (23,550) | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for investing activities | 4,694 | | | 429 | | | (2,922) | | | | | |
| IAS 29 & IAS 21 effect for interest paid | 1,109 | | | 1,639 | | | (4,408) | | | | | |
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow from operations (unaudited) | 151,769 | | | 106,143 | | | 66,683 | | | | | |
(*) Dividends paid to non-controlling interest were considered retroactively in 2020 and 2019.
B.LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our liquidity and capital resources are and will be influenced by a variety of factors, including:
•our ability to generate cash flows from our operations;
•the level of our outstanding indebtedness and the interest that we are obligated to pay on such outstanding indebtedness;
•our capital expenditure requirements, which consist primarily of investments in new farmland, in our operations, in equipment and plant facilities and maintenance costs; and
•our working capital requirements.
Our principal sources of liquidity have traditionally consisted of shareholders’ contributions, short and long term borrowings and proceeds received from the disposition of transformed farmland or subsidiaries.
We believe that our working capital will be sufficient during the next 12 months to meet our liquidity requirements.
On December 21, 2021, the Company agreed to acquire the rice production operations in Uruguay and Argentina currently owned by certain subsidiaries of Viterra Limited, a third party company. The acquisition is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including the receipt of certain government approvals in Uruguay, among others. These conditions have not been satisfied as of the date of this annual report and therefore the acquisition is not closed.The terms and conditions of the agreement contemplate the payment, subject to adjustments, of an approximate amount of US$18 million in three annual installments and the assumption of existing financial debt for an amount to be finally determined at closing (approximately US$20 million as of the date of our consolidated financial statements).
Years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021 and 20172020
The table below reflects our statements of Cash Flow for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021 and 2017.2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | |
| | (in thousands of $) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 336,282 | | | 290,276 | | | |
Net cash generated from operating activities (a) | 348,662 | | | 257,125 | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities (b) | (175,221) | | | (121,916) | | | |
Net cash used from financing activities (c) | (303,133) | | | (53,919) | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes and inflation on cash and cash equivalents (d) | (6,824) | | | (35,284) | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 199,766 | | | 336,282 | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | (in thousands of $) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 273,635 |
| | 269,195 |
| | 158,568 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes and inflation on cash and cash equivalents (d) | (18,896 | ) | | (18,297 | ) | | (8,337 | ) |
Net cash generated from operating activities (a) | 322,110 |
| | 218,513 |
| | 237,105 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities (b) | (248,710 | ) | | (174,922 | ) | | (188,335 | ) |
Net cash used / generated from financing activities (c) | (37,863 | ) | | (20,854 | ) | | 70,194 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 290,276 |
| | 273,635 |
| | 269,195 |
|
(a) Includes 23,550US$ thousands (30,666) and 7,598US$ thousands (14,956) of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 20192021 and 2018,2020 , respectively.
(b) Includes 3,851US$ thousands (4,694) and 4,122US$ thousands (429) of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
(c) Includes (14,340)US$ thousands 41,237 and (8,231)US$ thousands 15,694 of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
(d) Includes (13,061)US$ thousands (5,877) and (3,489)US$ thousands (309) of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
Operating Activities
Year ended December 31, 20192021
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, net cash generated by operating activities was $322.1 million .$348.7 million. During this year, we generated a net gain of $0.3$130.7 million that included non-cash charges relating primarily to depreciation of Property, plant and equipment and Right of use assets for $219.6$218.1 million, interest and other financial expenses, net of $62.7$75.6 million, foreign exchanges losses for $108.5 million, $15.6$52.7 million loss as a result of the reclassification from Equity to Financial results, net in connection with the cash flow hedge accounting and $92.4losses for $17.3 million as a result of our derivative financial instruments position. All these effects were partially offset by an unrealized gain in initial recognition and changes in fair value of non-harvested biological assets for $11.3 million, foreign exchange gains for $18.9 million, and $11.5 million net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items.
In addition, other changes in operating asset and liability balances resulted in a net decrease in cash of $15.6$161.8 million, primarily due to an increase in our inventories and trade and other receivables. During 20192021 income tax paid totaled $2.3$2.2 million.
The net cash generated by operating activities in 20192021 includes $23.6$30.7 million of the positivenegative combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries. (See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-A. Operating Results- Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”).
Year ended December 31, 20182020
For the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, net cash generated by operating activities was $218.5$257.1 million. During this year, we generated a net lossgain of $23.2$1.1 million that included non-cash charges relating primarily to depreciation of Property, plant and amortizationequipment and Right of $154.3use assets for $182.7 million, interest and other financial expenses, net of $44.3 million, $36.2 million gain from the sale of farmland and other assets, $13.4 million net gain from the fair value adjustment of investment properties, $51.5 million gain from derivative financial instruments and forwards, $30.3 million gain from the unrealized portion of “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets”, $183.2$47.7 million, foreign exchanges losses $26.7for $109.3 million, $24.4 million loss as a result of the reclassification from Equity to Financial results, net in connection with the cash flow hedge accounting, and $81.9$12.1 million net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items.
In addition, other changes in operating asset and liability balances resulted in a net decrease in cash of $18.7$85.2 million, primarily due to an increase trade and other receivables. During 20182020 income tax paid totaled $1.9$2.1 million.
The net cash generated by operating activities in 20182020 includes $7.6$15.0 million of the positivenegative combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries. (See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-A. Operating Results- Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”).
Investing Activities
Year ended December 31, 2017
For the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash generated by operating activities was $237.1 million. During this year, we generated a net income of $15.0 million that included non-cash charges relating primarily to depreciation and amortization of $151.0 million, interest and other financial expenses, net of $53.4 million, $38.7 million gain from derivative financial instruments and forwards, $14.6 million gain from the unrealized portion of “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets”, $38.7 million foreign exchanges losses, and $20.8 million loss as a result of the reclassification from Equity to Financial Results, net in connection with the cash flow hedge accounting.
In addition, other changes in operating asset and liability balances resulted in a net decrease in cash of $18.7 million, primarily due to an increase the cash collected for the derivative positions. During 2017 income tax paid totaled $2.9 million.
Investing Activities
Year ended December 31, 20192021
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $248.7$175.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, primarily due to $98.6$78.5 million related to the renewal and expansion of our sugarcane plantation; $156.6$134.5 million, mainly driven by the purchase of agricultural and industrial equipment related to the ongoing investment in the maintenance and expansion of crushing capacity in Ivinhema and Angelica mills, the purchase of industrial equipment for our peanut processing facility coupled with renewal and expansion of our dairy herd for our new free stall and investments in cheese equipment to enhance our product portfolio offering. Net inflows from investing activities were related to proceeds from the sale of farmland and other assets for $21.1 million, and installments from the sale of subsidiaries and interest income of $16.7 million.
Net cash used in investing activities includes $4.7 million of the negative combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries.
Year ended December 31, 2020
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $121.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to $63.8 million related to the renewal and expansion of our sugarcane plantation; $76.3 million, mainly driven by the purchase of agricultural and industrial equipment related to the ongoing investment in the expansion of crushing capacity in Ivinhema, and the acquisitionpurchase of two milk processing facilities, two brands from SanCor and oneindustrial equipment for our peanut processing facility.facility coupled with renewal and expansion of our dairy herd for our new free stall. Net inflows from investments activities were related to proceeds from the sale of farmland and other assets for $8.5$29.7 million and interest income of $8.1$25.4 million.
Net cash used in investing activities includes $3.9$0.4 million of the positivenegative combine effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries.
Financing Activities
Year ended December 31, 20182021
Net cash used in investingfinancing activities totaled $174.9was $303.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to $92.7derived from the incurrence in new long-term loan for $31.0 million related toand from the renewalincurrence of short-term loan of $286.1 million for our working capital expenditures. All these effects were partially offset by payments of long and expansionshort-term borrowings for $108.4 million and $328.5 million, respectively. During this year interest paid net totaled $53.6 million and re-purchase of our sugarcane plantation; $114.4 million related to purchase of agricultural and industrial equipment. Net inflows from investments activities were related to proceeds from the sale of farmland and other assets for $31.5 million and interest income of $7.9own shares totaled $66.5 million.
Net cash used in investingfinancing activities includes $4.1$41.2 million of the positive combinenegative combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries.subsidiaries, of which $1.1 million negative effect are over Interest paid.
Year ended December 31, 20172020
Net cash used in investingby financing activities totaled $188.3was $53.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to $84.0 million related to the renewal and expansion of our sugarcane plantation; $114.5 million related to purchase of agricultural and industrial equipment. Net inflows from investments activities were related to interest income of $11.2 million.
Financing Activities
Year ended December 31, 2019
Net cash used in financing activities was $37.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, primarily derived from the incurrence in Brazil of new long term loan by Certificados de Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA) for $99.2$116.0 million and from the incurrence of short term loan of $194.0$207.2 million for our working capital expenditures. All these effects were partially offset by payments of long and short term borrowings for $101.8$34.8 million and $127.9$233.5 million, respectively. During this period Interestinterest paid net totaled $57.7$60.0 million and re-purchase of our own shares totaled $4.3$4.4 million.
Net cash used in financing activities includes $14.3$15.7 million of the negative combine effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries.subsidiaries, of which $1.6 million negative effect are over Interest paid.
Capital Expenditure Commitments
In December 2019, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema placed R$ 400.0 million in Certificados de Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA), due in November 2027 and bearing an interestAs of IPCA (Brazilian official inflation rate) + 3.80% per annum.
Year ended December 31, 2018
Net cash used by financing activities was $20.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily derived from the incurrence in Argentina of new long term loan by Rabobank2021, we had no material commitments for $50 million and from the incurrence of short term loan of $318.1 million for our working capital expenditures. All these effects were partially offset by payments of long and short term borrowings for $124.3 million and $190.6 million, respectively. During this period Interest paid net totaled $50.0 million and re-purchase of our own shares totaled $15.7 million.
Net cash used in financing activities includes $8.2 million of the negative combine effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries.
Year ended December 31, 2017
Net cash used in financing activities was $70.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily derived from the issuance of senior notes 2027 for $495.7 million and from the incurrence of a new syndicated long term loan by Rabobank and ING among others lenders in the amounts of $232.4 million and short term loan of $106.7 million, respectively. The main use of proceeds of the notes was the prepayment of long-term debt of our Brazilian subsidiaries. Accordingly, payments of long-term borrowings totaled $602.7 million. Interest paid net totaled $41.6 million and re-purchase of our own shares totaled $38.4 million.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Historically since our cash flows from operations were insufficient to fund our working capital needs and investment plans, we funded our operations with proceeds from short-term and long-term indebtedness and capital contributions from existing
and new private investors. In 2011, we raised $421.8 million from an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) and simultaneous private placement. As of December 31, 2019,2021, our cash and cash equivalents amounted to $290.3$199.8 million.
However, we may need additional cash resources in the future to continue our investment plans. Also, we may need additional cash if we experience a change in business conditions or other developments. We also might need additional cash resources in the future if we find and wish to pursue opportunities for investment, acquisitions, strategic alliances or other similar investments. If we ever determine that our cash requirements exceed our amounts of cash and cash equivalents on hand, we might seek to issue debt or additional equity securities or obtain additional credit facilities or realize the disposition of transformed farmland and/or subsidiaries. Any issuance of equity securities could cause dilution for our shareholders. Any incurrence of additional indebtedness could increase our debt service obligations and cause us to become subject to additional restrictive operating and financial covenants, and could require that we pledge collateral to secure those borrowings, if permitted to do so. It is possible that, when we need additional cash resources, financing will not be available to us in amounts or on terms that would be acceptable to us or at all.
Indebtedness and Financial Instruments
The table below illustrates the maturity of our indebtedness (excluding obligations under finance leases) and our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates:
| | | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Fixed rate: | |
| | |
| Fixed rate: | | | |
| Less than 1 year(l) | 120,154 |
| | 105,708 |
| Less than 1 year(l) | 104,349 | | | 116,113 | |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 46,247 |
| | 16,287 |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 12,503 | | | 52,175 | |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 55,453 |
| | 25,704 |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 12,500 | | | 39,844 | |
| Between 3 and 4 years | 40,725 |
| | 43,507 |
| Between 3 and 4 years | — | | | 12,500 | |
| Between 4 and 5 years | 10,331 |
| | 26,415 |
| Between 4 and 5 years | — | | | — | |
| More than 5 years | 595,550 |
| | 505,456 |
| More than 5 years | 497,455 | | | 497,009 | |
| Total fixed rate: | 868,460 |
| | 723,077 |
| Total fixed rate: | 626,807 | | | 717,641 | |
| Variable rate: | | | |
| Variable rate: | | | |
| Less than 1 year(l) | 67,924 |
| | 37,724 |
| Less than 1 year(l) | 7,815 | | | 41,513 | |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 20,007 |
| | 17,278 |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 5,075 | | | 32,870 | |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 7,197 |
| | 29,861 |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 31,754 | | | 6,035 | |
| Between 3 and 4 years | 4,692 |
| | 22,886 |
| Between 3 and 4 years | 29,255 | | | 5,154 | |
| Between 4 and 5 years | — |
| | 18,251 |
| Between 4 and 5 years | 71,045 | | | 28,334 | |
| More than 5 years | — |
| | 12,444 |
| More than 5 years | 45,900 | | | 139,543 | |
| Total variable rate: | 99,820 |
| | 138,444 |
| Total variable rate: | 190,844 | | | 253,449 | |
| Total: | 968,280 |
| | 861,521 |
| Total: | 817,651 | | | 971,090 | |
| |
(1) | The Company plans to partially rollover its short term debt using new available lines of credit, or on using operating cash flow to cancel such debt. |
(1)The Company plans to partially rollover its short term debt using new available lines of credit, or on using operating cash flow to cancel such debt.
Borrowings incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries in Brazil are repayable at various dates between January 20202022 and November 2027 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 2.5%2.50% to 7.95% per annum or variable rates based on LIBOR or other specific base-rates plus spreads ranging from 5.47%5.16% to 8.33%14.73% per annum. AtAs of December 31, 20192021 and 2020 there are no borrowings subject to LIBOR (six months) was 1.91% (2018: 2.88%).
Borrowings incurred by the Company´sCompany’s subsidiaries in Argentina are repayable at various dates between January 20202022 and June 20242028 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 5.68%—% and 7.50%6.2% per annum or variable rates based on LIBOR or other specific base-rates plus spreads ranging from 4.00% to 4.75%of 4.0% for those borrowings denominated in U.S. Dollar, and a fixed interest rate at 61.00%ranging from 34% to 39% per annum for those borrowings denominated in Argentine pesos.
Brazilian Subsidiaries
The main loans of the Company’s Brazilian Subsidiaries identified below are:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank | Grant date | Nominal amount | Capital outstanding as of December 31 | Maturity date | Annual interest rate |
| 2019 | 2018 |
| (In millions) | Millions of Reais | Millions of equivalent Dollars | Millions of equivalent Dollars |
| Banco Do Brasil (1) | October 2012 | R$ | 130.0 |
| R$ | 54.2 |
| 13.4 |
| 18.8 |
| November 2022 | 2.94% minus 15% of performance bonus |
| Itau BBA FINAME Loan (2) | December 2012 | R$ | 45.9 |
| R$ | 6.5 |
| 1.6 |
| 3.1 |
| December 2022 | 2.50% |
| Banco do Brasil / Itaú BBA Finem Loan (3) | September 2013 | R$ | 273.0 |
| R$ | 66.3 |
| 16.5 |
| 38.0 |
| January 2023 | 6.83% |
| BNDES Finem Loan (4) | November 2013 | R$ | 215.0 |
| R$ | 83.7 |
| 20.8 |
| 28.6 |
| January 2023 | 3.75% |
| ING Bank N.V. (5) | October 2018 | US$ | 75.0 |
| | — |
| 75.0 |
| 75.0 |
| October 2023 | 6.33% |
| Certificados Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA) | December 2019 | R$ | 400.0 |
| | — |
| 99.2 |
| — |
| November 2027 | 3,8% + IPCA |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank | Grant date | Nominal amount | Capital outstanding as of December 31 | Maturity date | Annual interest rate |
| 2021 | 2020 |
| (In millions) | Millions of
Reais | Millions of equivalent Dollars | Millions of
equivalent
Dollars |
| Banco Do Brasil (FCO) (1) | October 2012 | R$ | 130.0 | | R$ | 17.7 | | 3.17 | | 7.1 | | November 2022 | 2.94% minus 15% of performance bonus |
| Itau BBA (FINAME) (2) | December 2012 | R$ | 45.9 | | R$ | 2.1 | | 0.37 | | 1.4 | | December 2022 | 2.50% |
| Banco do Brasil / Itaú BBA (FINEM) (3) | September 2013 | R$ | 273.0 | | R$ | 26.5 | | 4.75 | | 9.5 | | January 2023 | 7.29% |
| BNDES (FINEM) (4) | November 2013 | R$ | 215.0 | | R$ | 29.5 | | 5.28 | | 10.7 | | January 2023 | 4.63% |
| Certificados Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA) | December 2019 | R$ | 467.0 | | R$ | 467.0 | | 83.68 | | 77.9 | | November 2027 | 3,80% + IPCA |
| Debenture | December 2020 | R$ | 447.0 | | R$ | 447.0 | | 80.10 | | 14.4 | | December 2026 | 4,24% + IPCA |
| ING Bank N.V (5) | October 2018 | US$ | 75.0 | | US$ | — | | — | | 75.0 | | October 2023 | 6.33% |
| |
(1) | Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; (ii) a first degree mortgage of the Sapálio farm; and (iii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment. |
| |
(2) | Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; (ii) a first degree mortgage of the Sapálio farm; and (iii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment. |
| |
(3) | Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; (ii) a first degree mortgage of the Sapálio farm; (iii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment; and (iv) long term power purchase agreements (PPA). |
| |
(4) | Collateralized by (i) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment; and (ii) power sales contracts. |
| |
(5) | Collateralized by sales contracts. |
(1)Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; and (ii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment.
(2)Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; and (ii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment.
(3)Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; (ii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment; and (iii) long term power purchase agreements (PPA).
(4)Collateralized by (i) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment; and (ii) power sales contracts.
(5)Canceled during 2021.
In December 2019, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema placed R$400.0 million in Certificados de Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA) adjustable by the IPCA (Brazilian official inflation rate), duematuring in November 2027 and bearing an interest of IPCA (Brazilian official inflation rate) + 3.80% per annum. This debt was issued with no guarantee.
Argentinian
The above mentioned loans, except the CRA, contain certain customary financial covenants and restrictions which require the company to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions, as well as restrictions on the payment of dividends. These financial ratios are measured considering the statutory financial statements of the Brazilian Subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020 we were in compliance with all financial covenants
Argentine Subsidiaries
The principal loanmain loans of Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. and Pilaga S.A., our Argentinian Subsidiaries is:subsidiaries, are:
|
| | | | | | |
| Bank | Grant date | Nominal amount | Capital outstanding as of December 31 | Maturity date | Annual interest rate |
| 2019 | 2018 |
| (In millions) | (In millions) | (In millions) |
| IFC Tranche A (1) | 2016 | USD 25 | US$18 | US$23 | 2023 | 4.3% per annum |
| IFC Tranche B (1) | 2016 | USD 25 | US$14 | US$21 | 2021 | 4% plus LIBOR |
| Rabobank (2) | 2018 | USD 50 | US$50 | US$50 | 2024 | 3% plus LIBOR |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank | Grant year date | Nominal
amount | Capital outstanding as of
December 31 | Maturity date | Annual interest rate |
| 2021 | 2020 |
| (In millions) | (In millions) | (In millions) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Rabobank (1) | 2018 | US$50.0 | 37.50 | 50.00 | June, 2024 | 6.17% |
| IFC Tranche A (2) | 2020 | US$12.6 | 12.35 | 12.60 | June, 2028 | 4% plus LIBOR |
| IFC Tranche B (2) | 2020 | US$9.4 | 9.22 | 9.41 | June, 2028 | 4% plus LIBOR |
(1) Collateralized by a US$ 113 million mortgage over Carmen farm, which is property of Adeco Agropecuaria S.A.
(2) Collateralized by the pledge of the shares of Dinaluca S.A., Compañía Agroforestal S.M.S.A. yand Girasoles del Plata S.A.
(2) Collateralized by a US$241.8 million mortgage over Carmen,Abolengo, San Carlos, Las Horquertas and La Rosa farms, which are property of Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., a US$35.7 million mortgage over El Meridiano farm, which is property of Pilaga S.A. and a US$44.3 million mortgage over Santa Lucia farm, which is property of Bañadoados del Salado S.A.
Loan with International Finance Corporation (IFC)
In June 2020, our Argentine subsidiaries, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.A. and L3N S.A. entered into a US$100 million loan agreement with International Finance Corporation (IFC), member of the World Bank Group. The above mentionedloan's tenor is eight years, including a two-year grace period, with a rate of LIBOR + 4%. In October 2020, US$22 million has been received. In December 2021, we entered into an amendment reducing the total amount to USD 60 million, that the Company could request the withdrawal until June 2022. If the Company withdraws the full amount, the rate would be reduced to LIBOR + 3%.
Argentine subsidiary loans contain customary financial covenants and restrictions which require us to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions, as well as restrictions on the payment of dividends. These financial ratios are measured considering the statutory financial statements of the Argentinian Subsidiaries.Argentine Subsidiary.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020 we were in compliance with all financial covenants
Senior Notes Due 2027
On September 21, 2017, the Company issued senior notes (the “Notes 2027”“2027 Notes”) for US$500 million, at an annual nominal rate of 6%. The Notes will mature on September 21, 2027. Interest on the 2027 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 21 and September 21 of each year, beginning on March 21, 2018. The total proceeds of the issuance net of expenses was $495.7 million.
During 2019As of December 31 2021 and 20182020, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.
Short-termShort-Term Debt.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, our short term debt totaled $188.1$112.2 million.
We maintain lines of credit with several banks in order to finance our working capital requirements. We believe that we will continue to be able to obtain additional credit to finance our working capital needs in the future based on our past track record and current market conditions.
C.RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.
We are involved in rice breeding and the development of new rice varieties with respect to our rice seed business in Argentina. Our efforts are aimedWe seek to improve all processes related to the selection of better rice materials. TheOur objective is to obtain superior cultivars with better yields, industrial performance, commercial quality and culinary parameters as driven by market demand. To that end, we engage in cross-breeding with market demand being the main driver.multiple varieties to achieve new seedswith superior features. We do so for different types of rice, such as long-grain, short-grain and round-grain rice. At the field level, we aim our breeding ofseek to breed new varieties and rice hybrids adapted to local conditions and production parameters. At the lab level, we are working with molecular markers that help us identify specific DNA details and improve quality parameters of the seed, such as purity.
In relation toconnection with these objectives,efforts, we have concludedentered into agreements with selected research and development institutions such as INTAInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria in Argentina, FLAR and HIAALInstituto Riograndense do Arroz in Colombia, EPAGRI, IRGA, BASF and others. Our rice seed research team continuously tests and develops new varieties, applying a highly technified and efficient breeding and selection system. We are currently strengthening our partnership with HIAAL (HíBrazil, Híbridos de Arroz para América Latina or Rice Hybrids for Latam)in Colombia, Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego in Colombia, Empresa de pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina in Brazil, and BASF in Germany to develop hybrid rice seeds.seeds and expand the scale of hybrid seed production. In addition, we are working with the National University of the Northeast of Argentina to develop double-haploid seeds, which will help us to reduce the selection process from five to one year.
SinceSince 2008, we have developed and released four new varieties of rice on the market. The latest released variety, called SCS121 CL was introduced to the program in 2017 and includes Clearfield® technology,technology. This variety was developed in collaboration with BASF and is tolerant to the herbicides that control harmful weeds. In 2020, we registered a new variety, Ita Caabo 109, which is best suited for the center-south rice region in Argentina. Currently, we have two new cultivars in the registration process and close to be released.an additional cultivar under registration. We have registered our own varieties of rice seeds with the correspondingrelevant Argentine authorities, the National Seed Institute (INASE)(Instituto Nacional de Semillas) and the National Registry of Seed Variety Properties (RNPC)(Registro Nacional de la Propiedad de Cultivares). With respect to the intellectual property of our seeds, we operate under the standards of ArPOV (ArgentineArgentine Association of Plant Variety Protection).Protection.
We use our seed varieties on our farms and sell them to rice producers in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay.
We arehave also developing Zero Grade Leveldeveloped zero grade level technology in most of our farms, which helphelps us to reduce water consumption and so energy consumption as well.consumption. For hilly farms, we are implementing a Polypipe irrigation system where we canwhich also helps us save on water anand energy. Additionally, for all theof our farms, we are developing an Irrigation Surveillance methodology based on the use of Drones,irrigation surveillance using drones, water sensors connected through IoTthe internet-of-things and digital platforms, fromall of which we expect to improveare improving water management efficiencies and improvedenhancing our rice yield performance.yields. In addition, we are developing a digital platform to centralize technical harvest information (seed, planting date, fertilizers, irrigation, farmworks, harvest etc.) All this information is available online through computers and mobile phones. See more details for both cases in “Technology“Item 4. Information of the Company—A. Business Overview—Technology and Best Practices” section.Practices."
RegardingIn our Sugar, & Ethanol business,and Energy segment, we have effectively implemented state-of-the-art technologies such as high pressure boilers for high cogeneration capacity, full mechanization of agricultural operations with online GPS tracking systems on all vehicles (trucks, combines, planters), and concentrated vinasse system among others. In addition to that,To optimize fertilization of sugarcane, we are developing vinasse-to-biogas technologycurrently enriching the vinasse with different nutrient concentrations, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, boron and zinc. We are also using drones in our Clusterplantations in Mato Grosso do Sul (For more details see “Sugar, Ethanolorder to improve some operational efficiencies such as planting quality, biological control, weed monitor and Energy” in “Operations and Principal Activities” Section). Currently,pesticide spraying among others.
In recent years, we arehave been developing a seedling production method called “MPB” (Muda Pre Brotada or Pre-Sprout Seedling). It briefly consistThis method consists of making the seedling sprout in a greenhouse and planting themit directly on the fields, instead of the traditional planting of billets (sugarcane stalk pieces). Two main goals are pursued through this technique. One is to introducetechnique: the introduction of new promising and healthy varieties quickly. Second goal is to obtain aof seeds quickly and the reduction of planting cost, which is achieved by using much less volume of planting seedling per hectare. In addition, and because of this, more land can be applied to sugarcane for milling, instead of using that sugarcane for seedling purposes. In 2020, we produced as much as 17 million of MPB inputs, enough to plant 1,600 hectares of sugarcane.
With regardsWe are also developing vinasse-to-biogas technology in our cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul (for more detail, see “Item 4. Information of the Company—A. Business Overview—Operations and Principal Activities—Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business”). In 2017, we obtained a patent to produce biogas from sugarcane vinasse, which is owned in equal parts with Methanum Engenharia Ambiental. In the industry, we have recently implemented artificial intelligence alongside automation process, which is based on real-time optimization. By assessing mass balance and measuring main key performance indicators every 10 seconds, the system helps us enhance our efficiency all along the industrial processes
In our Dairy segment in Argentina, we have successfully adapted and implemented the Free Stallfree-stall model in our operations. Additionally, we have invested in technology to improve the genetics, health and feeding techniques of our cows in order to enhance our milk production. Currently, we are implementing Sexed Semen Technologysexed semen technology in all our cows, which is delivering excellentpositive results. The primary goal is to enhance the production of females from our own herd. Thisherd, which allows us to increase the speed-capacity of organic growth by 20% annually, and/or to intensify our cow-genetic selection process. The former being critical to our current Dairy growth project, and the latter being key to improve cow performance (productivity, health, and fertility). (See more details in “Dairy Business” in “Operations“Item 4. Information of the Company—A. Business Overview—Operations and Principal Activities” Section)Activities—Dairy Business”).
In our Crops segment, we are also implementing the same digital platform mentioned as in our Rice segment, although certain features are still being developed for the particularities of each crop. Currently, we are managing all grain stored in silo bags through this platform. To enhance efficiencies in our operations, we are developing other digital in-house solutions related to precision agriculture, such as crop yield estimation, soil quality classification and production dashboard among others. We have also developed a traceability app for our peanut business where we can track all main production and commercial information, with a special focus on quality assurance for customers. We are introducing automation in our peanut facility, where we are sensing processes with high accuracy and timing and thus helping us achieve energy savings.
In addition to traditional R&D activities, since we are constantly looking to improve efficiencies in each of our businesses,businesses. As such, we are also constantly researchingresearch and analyzinganalyze all the available technologies that could be applied in our operations. In addition, we do not only select the best technologies and techniques, but we are strongly involved in their adaptation to our specific needs and local circumstances. Our internal research group is comprised of interdisciplinary teams (agronomists, veterinarians, industrial engineers, technicians and finance and commercial)commercial personnel). The group offers support to all business lines and through different levels, from
the optimization of current operations, evaluation of new technologies, development of new products, to the assessment of a whole new production system.
Currently we are actively involved in the local AgTech (Agriculturalagtech (agricultural, digital-based Technology)technology) ecosystems to identify any high-potential Startupstartups that would not only be able tocould provide alternative solutions for our operations and potentiallyfor the market.market as a whole. We are also evaluatingcontinue to evaluate potential investment in Startupsstartups that fit our business (see “Technologybusiness. See “Item 4. Information of the Company—A. Business Overview—Technology and Best Practices” section)Practices.”
We do not own any registered patents, industrial models or designs, apart from those described in the first paragraphs of this section.
D.TREND INFORMATION
See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations.”
E.OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTSE CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
For any of the periods presented, we did not have any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations
Our critical accounting policies and estimates are consistent with unconsolidated entities or otherwise that are reasonably likelythose described in note 32 to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
F.TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less than 1 year | Between 1 and 2 years | Between 2 and 5 years | Over 5 Years | Total |
| | (in millions of $) |
Borrowings (1) | 122.4 |
| 154.7 |
| 230.1 |
| 681.8 |
| 1,189.0 |
|
Lease liabilities (1) | 46.4 |
| 52.4 |
| 89.3 |
| 121.1 |
| 309.2 |
|
| Total | 168.8 |
| 207.1 |
| 319.4 |
| 802.9 |
| 1,498.2 |
|
(1) Includes interest related to borrowings/finance costs related to lease liabilities
G.SAFE HARBOR
See section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” appearing on page iv in this annual report.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A.DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Board of Directors
The following table sets forth information for our directors as of the date of this annual report:
| | | Name | Position (*) | Date of appointment | Age | Year term expires | Name | Position (*) | Date of
appointment | Age | Year term
expires |
| Plínio Musetti | Chairman | 2020 | 65 | 2023 | Plínio Musetti | Chairman | 2020 | 68 | 2023 |
| Mariano Bosch | Director /CEO | 2020 | 49 | 2023 | Mariano Bosch | Director /CEO | 2020 | 52 | 2023 |
| Alan Leland Boyce | Director | 2019 | 59 | 2022 | Alan Leland Boyce | Director | 2022 | 62 | 2025 |
| Andrés Velasco Brañes | Director | 2019 | 58 | 2022 | Andrés Velasco Brañes | Director | 2022 | 61 | 2025 |
| Daniel González | Director | 2020 | 49 | 2023 | Daniel González | Director | 2020 | 52 | 2023 |
| Guillaume Van der Linden | Director | 2018 | 59 | 2021 | Guillaume Van der Linden | Director | 2021 | 62 | 2024 |
| Mark Schachter | Director | 2018 | 39 | 2021 | Mark Schachter | Director | 2021 | 42 | 2024 |
| Ivo Andrés Sarjanovic | Director | 2018 | 54 | 2021 | Ivo Andrés Sarjanovic | Director | 2021 | 56 | 2024 |
| Alejandra Smith | Director | 2019 | 64 | 2022 | |
| Ana Cristina Russo | | Ana Cristina Russo | Director | 2022 | 55 | 2025 |
Plínio Musetti, Alan Leland Boyce, Guillaume van der Linden, Mark Schachter, Andrés Velasco Brañes, Daniel González , Ivo Andrés Sarjanovic and Alejandra SmithAna Cristina Russo qualify as independent directors in accordance with NYSE standards.
A description of the main tasks currently performed by each director as well as a description of each director’s employment history and education follows:
Plínio Musetti. Mr. Musetti has been a member of the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors since 2011 and an observer since 2010. Mr. Musetti is a Managing Partner of Janos Holding responsible for long termlong-term equity investments for Family offices in Brazil, following his role as Partner of Pragma Gestão de Patrimonio, since June 2010. From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Musetti served as the Chief Executive Officer of Satipel Industrial S.A., leading the company’s initial public offering process and aiding its expansion plan and merger with Duratex S.A. From 1992 to 2002, Mr. Musetti served as the Chief Executive Officer of Elevadores Atlas, during which time he led the company’s operational restructuring, initial public offering process and the sale to the Schindler Group. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Musetti served as a partner at JP Morgan Partners and Chief Executive Officer of Vitopel S.A. (JP Morgan Partners’ portfolio company) where he led its private equity investments in Latin America. Mr. Musetti has also served as a Director of Diagnósticos de America S.A. from 2002 to 2009. In addition, Mr. Musetti is currently serving as a Board member of Raia Drogasil S.A. and Grupo Notredame Intermédica.HAPVIDA. Mr. Musetti graduated in Civil Engineering and Business Administration from Mackenzie University and attended the Program for Management Development at Harvard Business School in 1989. Mr. Musetti is a Brazilian citizen.
Mariano Bosch. Mr. Bosch is a co-founder of Adecoagro and has been the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors since inception (2002). From 1995 to 2002, Mr. Bosch served as the founder and Chief Executive Officer of BLS Agribusiness, an agricultural consulting, technical management and administration company. Mr. Bosch has over 22 years of experience in agribusiness development. Currently he is an independent board member of the SPAC, Replay Acquisition CORP (RPLA). He is involved in business organizations such as IDEA, AEA, YPO, AACREA, FPC and AAPRESID. He graduated with a degree in Agricultural Engineering from the University of Buenos Aires. In 2018, he received a Konex award and in 2019, the Businessman of the yearYear Award, by Endeavor. Mr. Bosch is Argentine citizen.
Alan Leland Boyce. Mr. Boyce is a co-founder of Adecoagro and has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since 2002 and has been Chairman of the Risk and Commercial Committee since 2011. Mr. Boyce is co-founder and Chairman of Materra LLC, a California based owner and operator of 15,000 acres of farmland where it grows pistachios, dates, citrus and organic vegetables. Since 1985, Mr. Boyce has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Boyce Land Co. Inc., a farmland management company that runs 10 farmland limited partnerships in the United States. Mr. Boyce is co-founder and CEO of Westlands Solar Farms, the only farmer-owned utility scale solarPV developer in California and recently co-founded Prairie Harvest, which has developed efficientis developing hemp growing and
harvesting processing technologies to efficiently separate CBD in Canada and the USA.field. Mr. Boyce formerly served as the director of special situations at Soros Fund Management from 1999 to 2007, where he managed an asset portfolio of the Quantum Fund and had principal operational responsibilities for the fund’s investments in South America. Mr. Boyce also served as managing director
at the Community Reinvestment Act at Bankers Trust from 1986 to 1999 where he was in charge of fixed-income arbitrage proprietary trading, the bank’s mortgage portfolio and Community Reinvestment Act compliance. In addition, Mr Boyce was senior managing director for investment strategy at Countrywide Financial from 2007 to 2008, and worked at the U.S. Federal Reserve Board from 1982 to 1984. He graduated with a degree in Economics from Pomona College, and has a Masters in Business Administration from Stanford University. Mr. Boyce is an American citizen.
Andres Velasco Brañes.Mr. Velasco has been a member of the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors since 2011. Mr. Velasco was the Minister of Finance of Chile between March 2006 and March 2010, and was also the president of the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association from 2005 to 2007. Prior to entering the government sector, Mr. Velasco was Sumitomo-FASID Professor of Development and International Finance at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, an appointment he had held since 2000. From 1993 to 2000, he was Assistant and then Associate Professor of Economics and the director of the Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies at New York University. During 1988 to 1989, he was Assistant Professor at Columbia University. Currently Mr. Velasco serves as Adjunct Professor of Public Policy at Harvard University, and a Tinker Visiting Professor at Columbia University. He also performs consulting services on various economic matters rendering economic advice to an array of clients, including certain of our shareholders. Mr. Velasco has been appointed Dean of New School of Public Policy at London School of Economics. Mr. Velasco holds a Ph.D. in economics from Columbia University and was a postdoctoral fellow in political economy at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He received an B.A. in economics and philosophy and an M.A. in international relations from Yale University. Mr. Velasco is a Chilean citizen.
Daniel C. Gonzalez. Mr. Gonzalez has been a member of the Company’s boardBoard of directionsDirectors since April 16, 2014. Mr. Gonzalez holds a degree in Business Administration from the Argentine Catholic University. He served for 14 years in the investment bank Merrill Lynch & Co in Buenos Aires and New York, holding the positions of Head of Mergers and Acquisitions for Latin America and President for the Southern Cone (Argentina, Chile, Peru and Uruguay), among others. While at Merrill Lynch, Mr. Gonzalez played a leading role in several of the most important investment banking transactions in the region and was an active member of the firm’s global fairness opinion committee. He remained as a consultant to Bank of America Merrill Lynch after his departure from the bank. Previously, he was Head of Financial Planning and Investor Relations in Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA. Mr. Gonzalez is currently thewas Chief Executive Officer of YPF Sociedad Anónima, whereArgentina’s largest corporation, from 2018 to 2020, and he is also a member of its Board of Directors. Mrhad previously served as CFO from 2012 to 2018. Mr. Gonzalez is alsocurrently Executive Director of IDEA (Instituto para el Desarrollo Empresarial Argentino), a member of the Board of Directors of Hidroeléctrica Piedra del Aguila S.A.not-for-profit business council in Argentina. Mr. González is an Argentine citizen.
Guillaume van der LindenLinden. Mr. van der Linden has been a member of the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors since 2009. Since 2007, Mr. van der Linden has been Senior Investment Manager at PGGM Vermogensbeheer B.V., currently responsible for investments in emerging markets local currency sovereignmarket debt. From 1993 to 2007, Mr. van der Linden worked for ING Bank in various roles, including in risk management and derivatives trading. From 1988 to 1993, Mr. van der Linden was employed as a management consultant for KPMG and from 1985 to 1988 as a corporate finance analyst for Bank Mees & Hope. Mr. van der Linden graduated with Masters degrees in Economics from Erasmus University Rotterdam and Business Administration from the University of Rochester. Mr. van der Linden is a Dutch citizen.
Mark Schachter. Mr. Schachter has been a member of the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors since 2009. Mr. Schachter has been a Managing Partner of Elm Park Capital Management since 2010. From 2004 to 2010, he was a Portfolio Manager with HBK Capital Management where he was responsible for the firm’s North American private credit activities. His responsibilities included corporate credit investments with a primary focus on middle-market lending and other special situation investment opportunities. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Schachter worked for American Capital, a middle-market private equity and mezzanine firm and worked in the investment banking division of Credit Suisse Group from 2001 to 2003. Mr. Schachter received a degree in Business Administration from the Ivey Business School at the University of Western Ontario and completed the Program for Leadership Development at Harvard Business School. Mr. Schachter is a Canadian citizen and has permanent American residence.
Ivo Andrés Sarjanovic. Mr. Sarjanovic served for more than 25 years in Cargill International, starting as trader in the Grain and Oilseeds business. While in Cargill he held between years 2000-2011 the position of Vice-president and Global Trading Manager of Oilseeds in Geneva, coordinating worldwide trading and crushing activities, and between 2007-2011 he was also the Africa and Middle East General Manager of Agriculture. From 2011 to 2014 Mr. Sarjanovic held the position of Vice-president and World Manager of Cargill Sugar Operations, playing a leading role in the radical transformation of the organization that led to the strategic decision to spin-off in 2014 the sugar business of Cargill creating Alvean Sugar SL, a joint venture integrated with Copersucar, Brazil. Mr. Sarjanovic served as the Chief Executive Officer of Alvean until 2017, during which time he led the company to become the biggest sugar trader in the world. Mr. Sarjanovic is currently non serving as non-
executive director inBoard member of Sucafina S.A, and is servingalso lectures of “Agricultural Commodities” at the University of Geneva, UniversityGeneva’s Master in Commodities and Universidad Di Tella and Austral.Tella’s Master of Finances. Mr. Sarjanovic
holds a B.A. in Economic Sciences, major in Accounting, from the National University of Rosario, Argentina and a Master in Economics from the UniversityUniversidad Francisco Marroquin.Marroquin, Spain. Additionally, he completed executive studies at IMD in Lausanne, at Oxford University and at Harvard Business School, and was a PhD candidate in Economics at New York University. Mr. Sarjanovic is an Argentine/Italian/Swiss citizen.
Alejandra Smith. Ms. Smith is
Ana Cristina Russo. Mrs. Russo graduated in business administration from Fundação Getúlio Vargas, São Paulo, Brazil. She joined Unilever as a Trainee in 1989 and worked directly with the founder of Edge Consultants, a management consulting firm, which helps its clients grow their businesses´ market share profitability, by leveragingbrand and category managers supporting them on strategic and operational expertise. Ms. Smith beganplanning, marketing & sales programs definitions. While doing well at Unilever, she left the company five years later to join Remy Cointreau, where she was CFO Brazil very early in her career and with responsibility for finance, HR, IT, Legal, and Export/Import.In 1996, a former Unilever colleague recommended her to Kraft (at the time, part of PMI). Mrs. Russo joined as FP&A for one of Kraft's BUs. Since then and over twenty years, she has built a highly successful career with Philip Morris. Mrs. Russo had several enriching experiences within the finance functions, i.e. Treasurer, Controller, Finance Director Brasil, Director Financial Planning Easter Europe, Middle East & Africa, VP Finance LA&C and VP Corporate Audit. She is currently serving as Managing Director for Central America, Dominican Republic and Caribe, responsible for full P&L of this new cluster, with direct presence in Procter & Gamble in 1983, where she acted as Director of the Health & Beauty Business Unit. She held posts in Mexico, Canadanine countries and throughout Latin America. In 1994 Ms. Smith joined PepsiCo, initially co-leading the beverages Go to Market technological transformationindirect in the USA. She was later appointed to the team in charge of the M&A of bottlers in Mexico, the largest international division, where she also established a profitable bottled water category. Subsequently, Ms. Smith transferred to the company's Snacks & Food Division to work in the Latin America and Asia Pacific regions as Commercial SVP and Quaker CEO. Ms. Smith worked for two multinational Fortune 100 Companies across the Americas and Asia Pacific. Ms. Smith concurrently serves as an independent member of the board of directors of BEPENSA (where she serves as president of the Compensation and Evaluation Committee), Zurich, City Express and Corona. Ms. Smith is fully bicultural and bilingual, holds degrees in Business Administration & Economics from the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de Mexico ( ITAM ). Ms. Smithremaining twenty-four. Mrs. Russo is a MexicanBrazilian and Italian citizen.
Executive Officers
The following table shows certain information with respect to our senior management as of the date of this annual report:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Position | | Year
Designated | | Age |
| Mariano Bosch | | Chief Executive Officer & Co-founder | | 2002 | | 52 |
| Carlos A. Boero Hughes | | Chief Financial Officer | | 2008 | | 56 |
| Emilio F. Gnecco | | Chief Legal Officer | | 2005 | | 46 |
| Renato Junqueira Santos Pereira | | Director of Sugar and Ethanol Operations | | 2014 | | 45 |
| Mario José Ramón Imbrosciano | | Director of Business Development | | 2003 | | 52 |
| Leonardo Berridi | | Country Manager for Brazil | | 2004 | | 62 |
| Ezequiel Garbers | | Country Manager for ARG/URU & Co-founder | | 2004 | | 55 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Name | | Position | | Year Designated | | Age |
| Mariano Bosch | | Chief Executive Officer & Co-founder | | 2002 | | 49 |
| Carlos A. Boero Hughes | | Chief Financial Officer | | 2008 | | 53 |
| Emilio F. Gnecco | | Chief Legal Officer | | 2005 | | 44 |
| Renato Junqueira Santos Pereira | | Director of Sugar and Ethanol Operations | | 2014 | | 42 |
| Mario José Ramón Imbrosciano | | Director of Business Development | | 2003 | | 49 |
| Leonardo Berridi | | Country Manager for Brazil | | 2004 | | 59 |
| Ezequiel Garbers | | Country Manager for ARG/URU & Co-founder | | 2004 | | 52 |
| Pilar Lacoste | | Director of Consumer Products | | 2019 | | 41 |
Mariano Bosch. See “—Board of Directors.”
Carlos A. Boero Hughes. Mr. Boero Hughes is our Chief Financial Officer, covering the company’s operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2008. He began working at Adecoagro in August 2008 overseeing our finance and administrative departments. Mr. Boero Hughes has over 2030 years of experience in agricultural business and financial markets. Mr Boero Hughes is also a member of the Board of Directors of Loma Negra C.I.A.S.A. Prior to joining us, he was Chief Financial Officer for South America and Co-Chief Executive Officer for Noble Group LTD operations in Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay from October 2006 to July 2008. From 2003 to 2006, he worked at Noble Group LTD as Financial Director for Argentina and Structure Finance Manager for South America. He worked at Citibank N.A. from 1997 to 2003 as Relationship and Product Manager, focused in the agribusiness industry, and at Banco Privado de Inversiones S.A. as Relationship Manager. He also worked for six years at Carlos Romano Boero S.A.I.C., a flour and dairy cow feed mill family company, as Commercial Manager, Local Grain Elevator and Nursery Manager and finally as General Manager. Mr. Boero Hughes holds a degree in Business Administration from the University of Buenos Aires and a Masters in Business Administration from the Argentine Catholic University. He also graduated from INSEAD’s Executive Program in 2007.
Emilio Federico Gnecco. Mr. Gnecco is our Chief Legal Officer for all operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2005. He is responsible for all legal and corporate matters and compliance. Before joining us, he was a corporate law associate at the law firm of Marval, O’Farrell & Mairal for more than 8eight years, where he specialized in mergers and acquisitions, project financing, structured finance, corporate financing, private equity, joint ventures and corporate law and business contracts in general. Mr. Gnecco was in charge of Adecoagro’s corporate matters including mergers and acquisitions since our inception in 2002. Prior to that, he worked at the National Civil Court of Appeals of the City of Buenos Aires for four years. Mr. Gnecco has a law degree from the University of Buenos Aires, where he graduated with honors.
Renato Junqueira Santos Pereira. Renato Junqueira Santos Pereira is the DirectorVP of our Sugar, Ethanol &and Energy business and has been a member of the senior management team since 2014. He began working at Adecoagro in 2010 as the Operations
Manager for our Sugar, Ethanol &and Energy business and has vast experience in the Brazilian sugarcane industry. Before joining Adecoagro, he served as the CFO of Moema Group, one of the largest sugarcane clusters in Brazil. His main responsibilities at Moema included designing the optimal capital structure to finance the construction of five greenfield mills, preparing the company for an IPO and coordinating the M&A process which culminated in a $1.5 billion dollar sale to Bunge Ltda. Previously, Mr. Pereira held responsibilities as Mill Director and Agricultural Manager in Moema’s mills. He is an Agricultural Engineer from Universidade de Sao Paulo and holds an MBA from the University of California, Davis.
Mario José Ramón Imbrosciano.Mr. Imbrosciano is the head of our Business Development Department for all operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay where he oversees all new business initiatives, and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2003. He has over 27 years of experience in farm management and agriculture production. Prior to joining Adecoagro, Mr. Imbrosciano was the Chief Operating Officer of Beraza Hnos. S.C., a farming company that owns farms in the humid pampas region of Argentina. He was in charge of production, commercialization and logistics for a 60,000 hectare operation. Mr. Imbrosciano has also worked as a private consultant for various clients. Mr. Imbrosciano received a degree in Agricultural Production Engineering from the Argentine Catholic University and holds a Masters in Business Administration from the Instituto de Altos Estudios of the Universidad Austral.
Leonardo Raúl Berridi. Mr. Berridi is our Country Manager for BrazilVP of Business Development and, prior to the Reorganization, had been Adecoagro’s Country Manager for Brazil since the beginning of its operations in Brazil and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2004. He coordinates all of our operations and human resources development activities in Brazil. Mr. Berridi has over 3637 years of international experience in agricultural business. Prior to joining us, Mr. Berridi was Vice President of Pago Viejo S.A., a company dedicated to agriculture production and dairy farming in in the humid pampas of argentina, Argentina. He also worked for Trans-Continental Tobacco Corporation as Chief Operating Officer of Epasa (Exportadora de Productos Agrarios S.A.), a company dedicated to producing, processing and exporting tobacco in the north eastnortheast and north westnorthwest of Argentina, and Production Manager of World Wide Tobacco España S.A. in the Caceres and Zamora provinces in Spain. Mr. Berridi holds a degree in Forestry Engineering from the Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Ezequiel Garbers. Mr. Garbers is the Country Manager for Argentina and Uruguay, co-founder and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management and the Country Manager since 2002.Management. He coordinates all of our production and human resources development activities in Argentina and Uruguay. Mr. Garbers has over 20 years of experience in agriculture production.Integrated Agroindustrial Chains. Prior to joining Adecoagro, he was the Chief Operating Officer of an agricultural consulting and investment company he co-founded, developing projects both within and outside of Argentina, related to crop production and the cattle and dairy business. Mr. Garbers holds a degree in Agronomic Engineering from the University of Buenos Aires and a Masters in Business Administration from the Instituto de Altos Estudios of the Austral University.
Pilar Lacoste. Ms. Lacoste is the Director of Consumer Products and is responsible for the business and brand development in Argentina’s retail unit. She has over 19 years of experience in leading consumer goods companies. Prior to joining Adecoagro in March 2019, she was a Sales Development Director at Danone Dairy Argentina. Ms. Lacoste also held various positions in sales, route to market and strategic planning for Danone’s Dairy and Waters divisions, from August 2009 through February 2019. In addition, Ms. Lacoste held other positions in the commercial planning department for 9 years in Anheuser-Busch InBev. Ms. Lacoste holds a Master in Business Administration and an Executive MBA from the IAE Business School and a Business Administration degree from the University of San Andres.
Our managers supervise our day-to-day transactions so as to ensure that all of our general strategic objectives are carried out, and they report to our boardBoard of directors.
Directors.
B.COMPENSATION
Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers
The compensation of the Company’s directors is approved annually at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting. For 2019,2021, the aggregate compensation earned by our directors amounted to a grant of up to a total of 55,55262,888 restricted stock shares and $500 thousand in cash. These figures do not include Mr. Mariano Bosch´sBosch’s compensation in cash nor in restricted shares, which he declined. For year 2020,2022, the aggregate compensation approved to be earned by our directors amounted to a grant of up to a total of 53,97675,904 restricted stock shares and $500 thousand in cash. These figures do not include Mr. Mariano Bosch’s compensation in cash nor in restricted shares, which he declined.
The aggregate compensation package of our executive officers for year 20192021 amounted to $1,362,752$2,524,601 in cash and 317,302856,278 restricted shares granted to our senior management. These grants were made under the Adecoagro Amended and Restated Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan, as amended. See “—E. Share Ownership—Share Options and Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan”.Plan." Annual cash bonuses are designed to incentivize our named executive officers at a variable level of compensation based on the Company’s financial and operating performance and each executive’s individual performance. Annual executive cash bonuses and stock unit awards are impacted by seniority and individual executive performance. 80% of variable performance is related to achievement of financial targets consisting of Adjusted EBITDA, Net Income, Adjusted Net Cash Flow from Operations, Cash Earnings and Return on Invested Capital. The remaining 20% is based on the achievement of individual objectives and by evaluating each executive’s level of proficiency in the following competencies: general characteristics, teamwork, professional competencies, environmental and social commitment, problem solving and thinking skills and managerial skills. In the past, actual bonus amounts have been determined shortly after fiscal year end. Our Chief Executive Officer presents the final calculation of the annual cash bonuses for our named executives to the Compensation Committee of the boardBoard of directors.Directors. The Compensation Committee then reviews actual Company and individual performance, and determines the amount payable consistent with the attainment of such individual’s performance based on the above criteria.
We do not pay or set aside any amounts for pension, retirement or other similar benefits for our officers and directors.
C.BOARD PRACTICES
Pursuant to our articles of incorporation, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors must be composed of between three and eleven members. The number of directors is determined and the directors are appointed at the general meeting of shareholders (except in case of a vacancy in the office of a director because of death, retirement, resignation, dismissal, removal or otherwise, the remaining directors may fill such vacancy and appoint a successor in accordance with applicable Luxembourg law).
Currently, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors has eleven members. The directors are appointed by the general meeting of shareholders for a period of up to three years; provided, however, the directors shall be elected on a staggered basis, with one-third of the directors being elected each year and provided further that such three yearthree-year term may be exceeded by a period up to the annual general meeting held following the third anniversary of the appointment. Directors may be removed with or without cause (ad nutum) by the general meeting of shareholders by a simple majority of votes cast at a general meeting of shareholders. The directors are eligible for re-election indefinitely.
There are no agreements with majority shareholders, customers, suppliers or others governing the selection of any of the directors or members of senior management. None of our non-executive directors has a service contract with us that provides for benefits upon termination of employment.
The boardBoard of directorsDirectors is empowered to manage Adecoagro and carry out our operations. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors is vested with the broadest powers to manage the business of the Company and to authorize and/or perform all acts of disposal, management and administration falling within the purposes of Adecoagro and all powers not expressly reserved by Luxembourg law or by our articles of incorporation to the general meeting of shareholders is within the competence of the boardBoard of directors.Directors.
Accordingly, within the limitations established by Luxembourg law and in particular the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915 on commercial companies (as amended) and our articles of incorporation, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors can take any action (by resolution or otherwise) it deems necessary, appropriate, convenient or fit to implement the purpose of the Company, including without limitation.
| |
a. | execute any acts or contracts on our behalf aimed at fulfilling our corporate purpose, including those for which a special power of attorney is required; |
limitation:
a.execute any acts or contracts on our behalf aimed at fulfilling our corporate purpose, including those for which a special power of attorney is required;
| |
b. | carry out any transactions; |
| |
c. | agree, establish, authorize and regulate our operations, services and expenses; |
| |
d. | delegate special tasks to directors, regulate the formation and operation of committees and fix the remuneration and compensation of expenses of advisors and/or staff with special duties, with a charge to overhead; |
| |
e. | appoint, suspend or remove agents or employees, establish their duties, remuneration, and bonuses and grant them the powers that it deems advisable; |
| |
f. | grant signature authorization to directors and officers, grant general or special powers of attorney, including those to prosecute; |
| |
g. | call regular and special shareholders’ meetings and establish agendas, submit for the shareholders’ approval our inventory, annual report, balance sheet, statement of income and exhibits, propose depreciation, amortization and reserves that it deems advisable, establish the amount of gains and losses, propose the distribution of earnings and submit all this to the shareholders’ meeting for consideration and resolution; |
| |
h. | fix the date for the payment of dividends established by the shareholders’ meeting and make their payment; and |
| |
i. | make decisions relating to the issuance, subscription or payment of shares pursuant to our articles of incorporation and decision of the regular or special shareholders’ meetings. |
b.carry out any transactions;
c.agree, establish, authorize and regulate our operations, services and expenses;
d.delegate special tasks to directors, regulate the formation and operation of committees and fix the remuneration and compensation of expenses of advisors and/or staff with special duties, with a charge to overhead;
e.appoint, suspend or remove agents or employees, establish their duties, remuneration, and bonuses and grant them the powers that it deems advisable;
f.grant signature authorization to directors and officers, grant general or special powers of attorney, including those to prosecute;
g.call regular and special shareholders’ meetings and establish agendas, submit for the shareholders’ approval our inventory, annual report, balance sheet, statement of income and exhibits, propose depreciation, amortization and reserves that it deems advisable, establish the amount of gains and losses, propose the distribution of earnings and submit all this to the shareholders’ meeting for consideration and resolution;
h.fix the date for the payment of dividends established by the shareholders’ meeting and make their payment; and
i.make decisions relating to the issuance, subscription or payment of shares pursuant to our articles of incorporation and decision of the regular or special shareholders’ meetings.
As of the date of this annual report, the chairman of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors is Mr. Plínio Musetti. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors has the following four committees:five committees and one sub-committee: Audit Committee, Talent Management & Compensation Committee, Risk and Commercial Committee, and Strategy Committee. On May 13, 2011, the former Risk and Strategy Committee split intoand ESG Committee; and Nominating Sub-Committee of the current Risk and Commercial Committee and the StrategyTalent Management & Compensation Committee.
Audit Committee
The Company’s articles of incorporation provide that the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may set up an audit committee. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors has set up an Audit Committee composed by independent directors and has appointed, pursuant to board resolutions dated May 10, 2018,19, 2019, Mr. Mark Schachter (Chairman), Mr. Ivo Andrés Sarjanovic and Mr. Andrés Velasco Brañes, as members of its audit committee.
The Company’s articles of incorporation provide that the audit committee shall (a) assist the boardBoard of directorsDirectors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, including periodically reporting to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors on its activity and the adequacy of the Company’s systems of internal controls over financial reporting; (b) make recommendations for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of, and consider the independence of, the Company’s external auditors; (c) review material transactions (as defined in the articles) between the Company or its subsidiaries with related parties (other than transactions that were reviewed and approved by the independent members of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors as defined in the articles of the Company) or other governing body of any subsidiary of the Company or through any other procedures as the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may deem substantially equivalent to the foregoing) to determine whether their terms are consistent with market conditions or are otherwise fair to the Company and its subsidiaries; and (d) perform such other duties imposed on it by the laws and regulations of the regulated market(s) on which the shares of the Company are listed, applicable to the Company, as well as any other duties entrusted to it by the boardBoard of directors.Directors.
In addition, the charter of the audit committee sets forth, among other things, the audit committee’s purpose and responsibilities.
The committee meets at least four times a year and as often as deemed necessary or appropriate in its judgment. During year 2021, the Audit Committee held meetings on February 25, March 4 and 9, May 6 and 10, August 4 and 9 and November 3 and 8.
Talent Management & Compensation Committee
The Company has a Talent Management & Compensation Committee (referred to indistinctively as Talent Management & Compensation Committee or Compensation Committee) that reviews and approves the compensation and benefits of the executive officers and other key employees, and makes recommendations to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors regarding principles for compensation, performance evaluation, and retention strategies. It is responsible for administering our share option plans and our restricted share and restricted stock unit plan for executive officers and other key employees. See “—E. Share Ownership—Share Options and Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan.” The committee has the discretion to interpret and amend the Plan, and delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the right to award equity-based compensation to executive officers and other key employees. The
The committee meets at least once a year and as needed on the initiative of the Chief Executive Officer or at the request of one of its members. The members of the Compensation Committee, appointed pursuant to board resolutions dated May 19, 2019, are Mr. Guillaume van der Linden, Mr. Daniel González (Chairman), and Mr. Plínio Musetti.
Nominating Sub-Committee
As part of the Talent Management & Compensation Committee, the Company has a Nominating Sub-Committee that selects and recommends to the board the best candidates to fill in vacant board seats, develops and recommends criteria for selecting qualified director candidates to the board, evaluates committee member qualifications, designations and removals, recommend the implementation of corporate governance guidelines, and oversees the evaluation of the board of directors and each committee.
The sub-committee meets at least once a year and as needed on the initiative of the Chief Executive Officer or at the request of one of its members. The members of the sub-committee, appointed pursuant to board resolutions dated March 11, 2022, are Mr. Guillaume van der Linden, Mr. Daniel González and Mr. Plínio Musetti.
Risk and Commercial Committee
The Company has a Risk and Commercial Committee (referred to in distinctively as Risk Committee or Risk and Commercial Committee) that has the duty to (i) make such inquiries as are necessary or advisable to understand and evaluate material business risks and risk management processes as they evolve from time to time; (ii) review with the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and management the guidelines and policies to govern the process for assessing and managing risks; (iii) discuss and review with the boardBoard of directorsDirectors management’s efforts to evaluate and manage the Company’s business from a risk perspective; (iv) request input from the boardBoard of directors,Directors, management and operating staff, as well as from outside resources, as it may deem necessary; (v) discuss with the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and management which elements of enterprise risk are most significant, the prioritization of business risks, and make recommendations as to resource allocation for risk management and risk mitigation strategies and activities; and (vi) oversee the development of plans for risk mitigation in any area which it deems to be a material risk to the Company; and (vii) monitor management’s implementation of such plans, and the effectiveness generally of its risk mitigation strategies and activities.
The committee meets at least four times a year and as often as deemed necessary or appropriate in its judgment. The members of the Risk and Commercial Committee appointed by the board meeting held on May 19, 2019 are Mr. Ivo Andrés Sarjanovic (Chairman), Mr. Andrés Velasco Brañes and Mr. Guillaume van der Linden.
Strategy Committee
The Company’s Strategy Committee has the duty to: (i) discuss and review with the board management’s identification and setting of strategic goals; including potential acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances and dispositions; (ii) make recommendations to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors as to the means of pursuing strategic goals; and (iii) review with the board management’s progress in implementing its strategic decisions and suggest appropriate modifications to reflect changes in market and business conditions.
The committee meets at least four times a year and as often as deemed necessary or appropriate in its judgment. The members of Strategy Committee appointed by the board meetings held on May 19, 2019 are Mr. Plínio Musetti (Chairman), Mr. Alan Leland Boyce, Ms. Alejandra Smith and Mr. Daniel Gonzalez.
ESG Committee
The Company has an ESG Committee created as part of the efforts to bring Environmental, Social and Governance ("ESG") to the forefront of its agenda and continue integrating these aspects into the overall strategy. The ESG Committee's main duties include (i) discussing and reviewing the company's operations in order to identify potential opportunities to improve our ESG performance; (ii) defining ESG strategies; and (iii) analyzing alternatives to enhance our ESG communication to stakeholders and expand our investor base.
The committee meets at least four times a year and as often as deemed necessary or appropriate in its judgment. The members of ESG Committee appointed by the board meetings held on November 9, 2021 are Mr. Alan Leland Boyce and Mr. Daniel Gonzalez, Mr. Guillaume van der Linden and Mr. Andres Velasco.
D.EMPLOYEES
Employees
On December 31, 2019,2021, we had 8,2379,104 employees, of whom 92%91% were unionized. Approximately 5%9% of our workforce is comprised of temporary workers. We comply with all labor laws. Historically, we have had a positive relationship with the trade unions.
The following table sets forth our number of employees by each of our business segments:
| | | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Farming and Land Transformation | 1,627 |
| | 1,136 |
| | 1,137 |
| Farming and Land Transformation | 2,156 | | | 1,794 | | | 1,627 | |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | 5,805 |
| | 5,859 |
| | 6,428 |
| Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | 5,930 | | | 6,093 | | | 5,805 | |
| Administrative | 805 |
| | 795 |
| | 761 |
| Administrative | 1,018 | | | 829 | | | 805 | |
| Total | 8,237 |
| | 7,790 |
| | 8,326 |
| Total | 9,104 | | | 8,716 | | | 8,237 | |
We do not have any severance agreements with our senior executive directors and managers.
Benefits
The benefits granted to our employees follow the market standard, including health plans and Spanish, English and Portuguese language lessons. In some cases, depending on the working location, we also provide meal, transportation, parking or financial aid for junior employees who are still in college. For senior management, we also provide vehicles.
E.SHARE OWNERSHIP
Share Ownership
The total number of shares of the Company beneficially owned by our directors, and executive officers and employees as a group, as of the date of this annual report, was 5,178,718,7,424,238, which represents 4.45%6.7% of the total shares of the company. See table in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions”Transactions—A. Major Shareholders” for information regarding share ownership by our directors and executive officers.
Share Options and Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan
Adecoagro/IFH 2004 Stock Incentive Option Plan and Adecoagro/IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan
The Company maintains the Adecoagro/IFH 2004 Incentive Option Plan (formerly, the International Farmland Holdings, LLC 2004 Incentive Option Plan, and referred to herein as the “2004 Plan”) and the Adecoagro/IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan (formerly, the International Farmland Holdings, LLC 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan, and referred to herein as the “2007/2008 Plan”). The 2004 Plan andDuring 2021, all options of the 2007/2008 Plan are collectively referred to herein asexpired, thus the “Option Plans.”plan is no longer in effect. Initially, the Option Plans2004 Plan provided for the grant of options to purchase ordinary units of IFH. In connection with the Reorganization, the Option Plans were amended and restated to provide for the grant of options to purchase ordinary shares of the Company, and all then-outstanding options to purchase IFH ordinary units were converted into options to purchase the Company’s ordinary shares.
The number of ordinary shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2004 Plan and the 2007/2008 Plan are 1,634,196 and 128,037,1,634,220, respectively. Shares subject to awards that become forfeited, cancelled, expired, withheld upon exercise, reacquired by the Company prior to vesting or otherwise terminated will again be available for future awards under the Option Plans.
Administration and Eligibility
The Option Plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors (the “Committee”). The Committee has general authority to, among other things, select individuals for participation, determine the time and amount of grants, and interpret the plans and awards. The Committee determines the vesting requirements of the awards. The Option Plans require that the exercise price of any future grants shall be no less than the greater of the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date of grant and the par value per ordinary share.
Individuals eligible to receive options under the 2004 Plan include officers and employees, and under the 2007/2008 Plan include officers, employees, directors, prospective employees and consultants.employees.
Amendment and Termination
The boardBoard of directorsDirectors may amend or terminate the Option Plans in its discretion, and the Committee may amend any outstanding options in its discretion, except participant consent will be needed if a participant’s rights are adversely affected. If not previously terminated by the boardBoard of directors,Directors, the Option Plans will terminate on the 10th anniversary of its adoption. The 2004 Plan was amended to extend the term to the 20thanniversary of its adoption.
Granted Options
Under the 2004 Plan, options to purchase 2,402,228 ordinary shares were granted and the weighted average exercise price of all granted options was $6.67. Under the 2007/2008 Plan, as of the same date, options to purchase 2,228,166 ordinary shares were granted, and the weighted average exercise price of all granted options was $13.07.
Outstanding options under the 2004 Plan vested in three equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, and options under the 2007/2008 Plan generally vest in four equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. Vesting under each of thethis Option Plans is generally subject to the participant’s continued service as of each applicable vesting date, and all options terminate 10 years from the date of grant. No further option under both plans will be granted.
Adecoagro S.A. Amended and Restated Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan
On November 11, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the amendment and restatement of the Adecoagro S.A. Restricted Share Plan, now known as the Amended and Restated Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan). On December 16, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company amended the Plan to extend the expiration date to October 28, 2030.
The Plan provides for awards of restricted shares or restricted stock units to employees, officers, members of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and other service providers of the Company. The purpose of the Plan is to further align the interests of participants with those of the shareholders by providing participants with long-term incentive compensation opportunities tied to the performance of the Company’s ordinary shares.
On March 10, 2020,9, 2021, the Plan was once again amended by the Board of Directors to increase the number of common shares available for issuance with respect to which awards may be made by 780,0001,200,000 common shares. Currently, the maximum number of common shares with respect to which awards may be made under the Plan is equal to 5,508,9306,708,930 common shares inclusive of such Shares that are subject to outstanding grants of Awards.awards. To the extent any award under the Plan is canceled, expired, forfeited, surrendered settled in cash, or otherwise terminated without delivery of shares the shares retained by or returned to the Company will again be available for future awards under the Plan. The shares available for issuance as well as outstanding awards under the Plan are subject to adjustment in the event of a reorganization, stock split, merger or similar change. Under the Plan, as of the date of this annual report, 3,188,536 ordinary shares had been issued to directors, senior management and employees.
Administration and Eligibility
The Plan is administered by the Committee. The Committee has general authority to grant awards, determine the recipients of awards and prescribe the terms of awards, as well as authority to interpret and apply the terms of the Plan and individual awards. The Committee determines the amount and the vesting requirements of the awards.
Terms of Awards
A grant of restricted shares represents ordinary shares that are issued subject to vesting requirements and transfer restrictions, as determined by the Committee in its discretion. The vesting requirements may be based on the continued employment or service of the participant for a specified time period or on the attainment of specified business performance goals established by the Committee. Subject to the transfer restrictions and vesting requirements of the award, the participant will have the rights of a stockholder of the Company, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends.
The number of restricted shares or restricted stock units awarded to individuals each year will be based on Company performance. Once awarded, the restricted shares or restricted stock units are subject to a service-based vesting schedule and vest in three equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject only to the participant’s continued service to the Company as of each applicable vesting date. Restricted stock units are payable following the vesting of an award in shares.
Amendment and Termination
The boardBoard of directorsDirectors may amend, modify, suspend or terminate the Plan in its discretion, except participant consent will be needed if participants’ rights are adversely affected. If not previously terminated by the boardBoard of directors,Directors, the Plan will terminate on the 10th20th anniversary of its adoption.
Share Options and Restricted Shares
The total number of ordinary and restricted shares to be issued upon exercise of the options to directors and executive officers as a group under our Option Plans is 1,530,2001,634,220 in the aggregate. The range of exercise prices per ordinary shares under our 2004 Plan is $5.83 to $8.62 (1,492,890 options). The range of exercise prices per ordinary shares under our 2007 Plan is $12.82 to $13.40 (37,310 options). Upon the exercise of all options no single beneficiarythe only employee that would own more thanexceed the 1% of total outstanding shares.holding is Mariano Bosch, who would reach 1.03%.
The total number of restricted stock units to be issued under the Plan to directors and executive officers as a group is 302,770 in the aggregate. Upon receipt of shares under the Plan no single beneficiary would own more than 1% of total outstanding shares.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A.MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our shares for each person known to us to own beneficially at least 5% of our common shares and our directors and executive officers, based on the information most recently available to the Company, as of April 23, 2020.27, 2022.
As of April 23, 2020,28, 2022, we had 117,812,864111,381,815 outstanding shares. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we have included shares that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days from April 23, 2020,24, 2022, including through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right or the conversion of any other security. These shares, however, are not included in the computation of the percentage ownership of any other person.
| | | | Number | | Percent | | Number | | Percent |
| Principal Shareholders: | |
| | |
| Principal Shareholders: | | | |
| Al Gharrafa Investment Company (1) | 15,983,265 |
| | 13.6 | % | Al Gharrafa Investment Company (1) | 15,983,265 | | | 14.4 | % |
| Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (2) | 15,381,385 |
| | 13.1 | % | Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (2) | 15,381,385 | | | 13.8 | % |
| Route One Investment LP (3) | 14,444,844 |
| | 12.3 | % | Route One Investment LP (3) | 14,340,344 | | | 12.9 | % |
| EMS Capital LP (4) | 11,781,655 |
| | 10.0 | % | EMS Capital LP (4) | 11,883,961 | | | 10.7 | % |
| Brandes Investment Partners LP (5) | 9,107,465 |
| | 7.7 | % | |
| Directors, Executive Officers and Company's employees as a Group* | 5,721,788 |
| | 4.8 | % | Directors, Executive Officers and Company's employees as a Group* | 7,417,861 | | | 6.7 | % |
* No single shareholder beneficially owns more than 1% based on the total number of outstanding shares.shares, except for from Mariano Bosch and Alan Boyce, each of whom beneficially owns 1.3% and 1.1%, respectively.
| |
(1) | The address of Al Gharrafa Investment Company is C/O Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Limited, 190 Elgin Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-9005, Cayman Islands. |
| |
(2) | The address of Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn is P.O. BOX 4001 NL-3700 KA Zeist The Netherlands. |
| |
(3) | The address of Route One Investment LP is 1 Letterman Drive, Building D, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94129, United States. |
| |
(4) | The address of EMS Capital LP is 767 Fifth Avenue 46th floor, New York, NY 10153. |
| |
(5) | The address of Brandes Investment Partners LP is 11988 El Camino Real, Suite 600, PO Box 919048, San Diego, CA 92130-9048, United States. |
(1)The address of Al Gharrafa Investment Company is C/O Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Limited, 190 Elgin Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-9005, Cayman Islands.
(2)The address of Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn is P.O. BOX 4001 NL-3700 KA Zeist The Netherlands.
(3)The address of Route One Investment LP is 1 Letterman Drive, Building D, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94129, United States.
(4)The address of EMS Capital LP is 767 Fifth Avenue 46th floor, New York, NY 10153.
As of April 23, 2020, 56,442,46028, 2022, 76,025,991 shares, representing 48.0%68.3% of our outstanding common shares were held by United States record holders.
B.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Share Purchase and Sale Agreement and UMA Right of First Offer Agreement
In connection with the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 16, 2006. The IFH Parties also entered into a Right of First Offer Agreement with Marcelo Weyland Barbosa Vieira, Paulo Albert Weyland Vieira, Mario Jorge de Lemos Vieira, and Corina de Almeida Leite, each of which is a current indirect shareholder in IFH, (together the “UMA Members”), dated February 16, 2006, whereby the IFH Parties agreed to grant the UMA Members a right of first offer to acquire the shares of UMA, or all or substantially all of the assets of UMA, or the real property or plot of land where the commercial offices of UMA is currently located and which is currently subject to a right-of-way and easement agreement granted to Mario Corina, Alfenas Agrícola Ltda. The rights granted to each of the UMA Members, their permitted affiliates, assignees, successors or heirs under such agreement are only in effect for as long as such entities hold such an equity interest in IFH or any of its affiliates.
Agriculture Partnership Agreements
Some of our agriculture partnership agreements are entered into with certain minority shareholders of the Company, for a total of 9,946.7 hectares. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we recorded other net amount (payables) or receivables for payments in advance amounting to $(0,819) million, $(0.2) million, $(0.4) million and $(0.7) million, respectively, and recognized expenses amounting to $2.3 million, $3.3 million and $2.9$0.4 million, respectively, in connection with these agreements.
Since 2018, these agreements are no longer related parties.
Registration Rights Agreement
In connection with the Reorganization, we entered into a registration rights agreement providing holders of our issued and outstanding common shares on January 28, 2011 (such holders being hereinafter referred to as the “Existing Investors” and such common shares subject to the agreement being hereinafter referred to as the “Registrable Securities”) with certain rights to require us to register their shares for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). Pursuant to the
agreement, if holders of a majority of the Registrable Securities notify us, no earlier than 180 days after the effective date of the registration statement previously filed by us on Form F-1, we are required, subject to certain limitations, to file a registration statement under the Securities Act in order to register the resale of the amount of ordinary shares requested by such holders. The underwriters in such an offering will have the right, subject to certain limitations, to limit the number of shares included in such registration. The Existing Investors have the right to require us to file one such registration. In addition, if we propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act, Existing Investors are entitled to notice of such registration and are entitled to certain “piggyback” registration rights allowing such holders to include their common shares in such registration, subject to certain restrictions. Furthermore, Existing Investors may require us to register the resale of all or a portion of their shares on a registration statement on Form F-3 once we are eligible to use Form F-3. In an underwritten offering, the underwriters have the right, subject to certain restrictions, to limit the number of Registrable Securities Existing Investors may include.
To see a summary of the balances and transactions with related parties, please see Note 3231 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Shelf Registration Statement on Form F-3
The Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form F-3 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 23, 2013, which was declared effective by the SEC on December 23, 2013. Pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement, certain shareholders may offer and sell from time to time, in one or more offerings, up to 55,821,281 common shares. The registration of the common shares for disposition by the principal shareholders does not mean that the principal shareholders will actually offer or sell any of the shares. The specifics of future offerings, if any, including the names of participating shareholders, the amount of shares to be offered and the offering price, will be determined at the time of any such offerings and will be described in a prospectus supplement filed at the time of any such offerings.
On March 21, 2016, we completed an underwritten secondary offering of 12.0 million common shares of Adecoagro offered by our shareholders Quantum Partners LP and Geosor Corporation, at a price per share to the public of $11.70 pursuant to the effective shelf registration statement described in the previous paragraph.
Advisory Service Agreement
On April 17, 2019 the Company, executed an Advisory Service Agreement with Mr. Marcelo Vieira (former director of the Company) for a term of 24 months. As consideration for the provision of advisory services under the agreement, the company will pay Mr. Vieira $ 50,000 per each year of the contact, and an award of restricted equity interests in the company with a value of $50,000.
C.INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
A.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
See Item"Item 18. Financial StatementsStatements" and pagepages F-1 through F-78F-88 for our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Legal and Administrative Proceedings
We are subject to several laws, regulations and business practices of the countries in which we operate. In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to certain contingent liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings, including those involving tax, social security, labor lawsuits and other matters. We accrue liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. Currently, we are not engaged in any material litigation or arbitration and no material litigation or claims are known to us to be pending or threatened against us which, either alone or on a combined basis, may result in an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or cash flows.
In Argentina and Brazil we are engaged in several legal proceedings, including tax, social security, labor, civil, environmental, administrative and other proceedings, for which we have established provisions in an aggregate amount of $3.1$3 million as of December 31, 2019.2021. In addition, there are currently certain legal proceedings pending in which we are involved for which we have not established provisions. In the opinion of our management, the ultimate disposition of any threatened or pending matters, either individually or on a combined basis, will not have a material adverse effect on our combined financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations other than as described below.
The Brazilian government filed a tax enforcement action against UMA to demand excise taxes (Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados, or “IPI”), or a federal value-added tax on industrial products, in the amount of approximately $4.4$3.7 million. We have obtained a favorable initial decision from the lower court, which accepted our argument on procedural grounds based on the Brazilian government’s loss of its procedural right to demand the IPI debts. Currently, the case is under review by an appellate court following the appeal filed by the Brazilian government. We have not made any provision for this claim based on legal counsel’s view that the risk of an unfavorable decision in this matter is remote. If this proceeding is decided adversely to us, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
José Valter Laurindo de Castilhos, Companhia Rio de Janeiro Agropecuária Ltda. and other former owners of the Rio de Janeiro and Conquista Farms have filed suit against us for the payment of a supplementary amount of approximately $39.5 million, as well as indemnity for moral and material damages, as a result of the alleged breach of the purchase agreement entered into by the parties. The lower court ruled in our favor, allowing us to keep possession of the Rio de Janeiro Farm. This decision has been appealed by Mr. Castilhos to the Superior Court of Justice (“Superior Tribunal de Justiça”). The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice determined thatdismissed the appeal. The merits of the case had no merit.are pending judgment by the court of first instance. This decision can be appealed by Mr. Castilhos. We have not made any provision for this claim based on legal counsel’s view that the risk of an unfavorable decision in this matter is remote. If this proceeding is decided adversely to us, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Dividend Policy
The amount and payment of dividends will be determined by a simple majority vote at a general shareholders’ meeting, typically but not necessarily, based on the recommendation of our boardBoard of directors.Directors. All shares of our capital stock rank pari passu with respect to the payment of dividends. Pursuant to our articles of incorporation, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors has the power to distribute interim dividends in accordance with applicable Luxembourg law. Dividends may be lawfully declared and paid if our net profits and distributable reserves are sufficient under Luxembourg law.
Under Luxembourg law, at least 5% of our net profits per year must be allocated to the creation of a legal reserve until such reserve has reached an amount equal to 10% of our issued share capital. If the legal reserve subsequently falls below the 10% threshold, at least 5% of the annual net profits again must be allocated toward the reserve. The legal reserve is not available for distribution.
On November 9, 2021, the Board of Directors approved the implementation of a distribution policy as of 2022 (the “Distribution Policy”) to distribute annually a minimum of 40% of the Adjusted Free Cash from Operations generated during the previous year, subject to the conditions set forth by Luxembourg law. The Distribution Policy consists of a cash dividend distribution in a minimum amount of USD30 million per year, and share repurchases under the existing program from time to time as deemed appropriate. Subject to the conditions set forth by Luxembourg law and notably subject to the Company having sufficient distributable reserves, any dividend distribution will be resolved upon either by the general meeting of the
shareholders of the Company or the Board of Directors (through a declaration of advances on dividends). Subject to the decision of the general meeting of the shareholders of the Company or the Board of Directors, dividend payments will be made twice a year, in or around May and November of each year.
On March 11, 2022 the Board of Directors proposed to the general meeting of the shareholders of the Company to declare a dividend of an amount of $35 million to be paid to the outstanding shares and out of the share premium account of the Company in two installments of $17.5 million each (in May 2022 and November 2022) and to delegate power to the Board of Directors to determine the record dates and the payment dates therefor.
On April 20, 2022 the annual general meeting of the shareholders of the Company declared a dividend in the amount of $35 million, to be distributed out of the share premium account of the Company in two installments (in May 2022 and November 2022) of $17.5 million to the holders of outstanding shares issued by the Company, and to delegate power to the Board of Directors to determine the record dates and the payment dates therefor. On April 20, 2022, the Board of Directors resolved that the record and payment dates for the payment of first installment will be May 2, 2022 and May 17, 2022, respectively, and that the record and payment dates for the payment of the second installment will be November 2, 2022 and November 17, 2022, respectively.
A Luxembourg withholding tax of 15% will be applied to the gross cash dividend amount.
Adecoagro is a holding company and has no material assets other than its ownership of partnership interests in Adecoagro LP SCS, in turn,SCS. As a result, it is a holding entity with no material assets other than its indirect ownership of shares in operating subsidiaries in foreign countries. If we were to distribute a dividend at some point in the future, we would cause the operating subsidiaries to make distributions to Adecoagro LP SCS, which in turn would make distributions to Adecoagro in an amount sufficient to cover any such dividends.
Our subsidiaries in Argentina and Brazil are subject to certain restrictions on their ability to declare or pay dividends. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness and Financial Instruments”, and also see “—Risks Related to our Business and Industries—CertainThe terms of our indebtedness and that of certain of our subsidiaries have substantial indebtedness which could impair theirimpose significant restrictions on our operating and financial condition and decrease the amount of dividends we receive.flexibility.”
B.SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
Except as otherwise disclosed in this annual report, there has been no undisclosed significant change since the date of the annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
A.OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS
Our common shares have been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “AGRO” since January 28, 2011. As of the date of this report, our issued share capital amounts to $183,572,723,$167.1 million, represented by 122,381,815111,381,815 shares (of which 5,295,76552,254 were treasury shares as of December 31, 2019) sharesshares) with a nominal value of $1.50 each. All issued shares are fully paid up.
B.PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Not applicable.
C.MARKETS
Our common shares have been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “AGRO” since January 28, 2011. See “—A. Offer and Listing Details.”
D.SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
Not applicable.
E.DILUTION
Not applicable.
F.EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information
A.SHARE CAPITAL
Not applicable.
B.MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
The following is a summary of some of the terms of our common shares, based in particular on our articles of incorporation and the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915 on commercial companies as amended.
Adecoagro’s shares are governed by Luxembourg law and its articles of incorporation. More information concerning shareholders’ rights can be found in the Luxembourg law on commercial companies dated August 10, 1915, as amended and the articles of incorporation.
The following is a summary of the rights of the holders of our shares that are material to an investment in our common shares. These rights are set out in our articles of association or are provided by applicable Luxembourg law, and may differ from those typically provided to shareholders of U.S. companies under the corporation laws of some states of the United States. This
summary does not contain all information that may be important to you. For more complete information, you should read our updated articles of association, which are attached as an exhibit to this annual report.
General
Adecoagro is a Luxembourg société anonyme (a joint stock company). The Company’s legal name is “Adecoagro S.A.” Adecoagro was incorporated on June 11, 2010 and on October 26, 2010 all the outstanding shares of Adecoagro were acquired by IFH LLC.
On October 30, 2010, the members of IFH LLC transferred pro rata approximately 98% of their membership interests in IFH LLC to Adecoagro in exchange for common shares of Adecoagro. In a series of transactions during 2012, we transferred shares of Adecoagro to certain limited partners of IFH in exchange for their residual interest in IFH, increasing our interest in IFH to approximately 100%.
On January 28, 2011, Adecoagro completed the IPO of its shares on the NYSE. The shares are traded under the symbol “AGRO.”
On March 27, 2015, Adecoagro commenced a series of transactions for the purpose of transferingtransferring the domicile of Adecoagro LP to Luxembourg. In connection with the Adecoagro LP redomiciliation, Adecoagro merged IFH into Adecoagro LP with Adecoagro LP as the surviving entity and Adecoagro GP S.à r.l., a société à responsibilitiéresponsibilité limitée organized under the laws of Luxembourg, became the general partner of Adecoagro LP on April 1, 2015. Also on April 1, 2015, Adecoagro completed the redomiciliation of Adecoagro LP (Delaware) out of Delaware to Luxembourg and Adecoagro LP, without dissolution or liquidation, continued its corporate existence as Adecoagro LP S.C.S., a société en commandite simple organized under Luxembourg law, effective April 2, 2015. For a detailed description of the Adecoagro LP redomiciliation please see “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—History. Since that date the affairs of Adecoagro LP S.C.S. have been governed by its articles of association and Luxembourg law.
Adecoagro is registered with the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies under number B153681. Adecoagro has its registered office at 6 Rue Eugène Ruppert, L-2453, Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
The corporate purpose of Adecoagro, as stated in Article 4 of our articles of incorporation (Purpose Object), is the following: The object of Adecoagro is the holding of participations, in any form whatsoever, in Luxembourg and foreign companies, or other entities or enterprises, the acquisition by purchase, subscription, or in any other manner as well as the transfer by sale, exchange or otherwise of stock, bonds, debentures, notes and other securities or rights of any kind including interests in partnerships, and the holding, acquisition, disposal, investment in any manner (in), development, licensing or sub licensing of, any patents or other intellectual property rights of any nature or origin as well as the ownership, administration, development and management of its portfolio. Adecoagro may carry out its business through branches in Luxembourg or abroad.
Adecoagro may borrow in any form and proceed to the issuance by private or public means of bonds, convertible bonds and debentures or any other securities or instruments it deems fit.
In a general fashion it may grant assistance (by way of loans, advances, guarantees or securities or otherwise) to companies or other enterprises in which Adecoagro has an interest or which form part of the group of companies to which Adecoagro, belongs or any entity as Adecoagro may deem fit (including upstream or cross stream), take any controlling, management, administrative and/or supervisory measures and carry out any operation which it may deem useful in the accomplishment and development of its purposes.
Finally, Adecoagro can perform all commercial, technical and financial or other operations, connected directly or indirectly in all areas in order to facilitate the accomplishment of its purpose.
Share Capital
As of December 31, 20192021, our issued share capital amounted to $183,572,722.50,$183,6 million, represented by 122,381,815 shares in issue (of which 4,643,39611,285,043 were treasury shares) with a nominal value of $1.50 each. All issued shares are fully paid up.
As of December 31, 2019 Consequently, there were 117,086050111,096,772 common shares outstanding.
On April 20, 2022, the extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders of the Company resolved to reduce the issued share capital of the Company by a nominal amount of $16.5 million by the cancellation of 11,000,000 shares with a nominal value of $1.50 each held in treasury by the Company so that, as from April 20, 2022, our issued share capital amounts to $ 167.1 million, represented by 111,381,815 shares in issue (of which 52,254 are treasury shares) with a nominal value of $1.50 each.
We have an authorized unissued share capital of $220,287,267,$220.3 million, including the issued share capital as of April 15, 202020, 2022 of $183,572,722.50$167.1 million and are authorized to issue up to 146,858,178 shares of a nominal value of $1.50 each (taking into account the shares issued as of April 15, 2020)20, 2022) out of such authorized share capital. Our authorized unissued share capital as of April 15, 202020, 2022 is $36,714,544.50.$53.2 million.
Our articles of incorporation authorize the boardBoard of directorsDirectors to issue shares within the limits of the authorized un-issuedunissued share capital at such times and on such terms as the board or its delegates may decide for a period ending on April 10,15, 2025 (unless it is extended, amended or renewed and we currently intend to seek renewals and/or extensions as required from time to time). Accordingly, the board may issue shares within the limits of the authorized (unissued) share capital against contributions in cash, contributions in kind or by way of incorporation of available reserves at such times and on such terms and conditions, including the issue price, as the Board of Directors or its delegate(s) may in its or their discretion resolve while reserving a preemptive subscription right to existing shareholders for any issue of shares.
Our authorized share capital is determined (and may be increased, reduced or extended) by our articles of incorporation, as amended from time to time, by the decision of our shareholders at an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting with the necessary quorum and majority provided for the amendment of our articles of incorporation. See “—Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation” and “—General Meeting of Shareholders”.
Under Luxembourg law, existing shareholders benefit from a preemptive subscription right on the issuance of shares for cash consideration.
Form and Transfer of sharesShares
Our shares are issued in registered form only and are freely transferable. Luxembourg law does not impose any limitations on the rights of Luxembourg or non-Luxembourg residents to hold or vote our shares.
Under Luxembourg law, the ownership of registered shares is evidenced by the inscription of the name of the shareholder, the number of shares held by him or her in the register of shares held at the registered office of the Company. Each transfer of shares in the share register shall be effected by written declaration of transfer to be recorded in the register of shares, such declaration to be dated and signed by the transferor and the transferee, or by their duly appointed agents. We may accept and enter into the share register any transfer effected pursuant to an agreement or agreements between the transferor and the transferee, true and complete copies of which have been delivered to us.
We may appoint registrars in different jurisdictions, each of whom may maintain a separate register for the shares entered in such register. We have appointed Computershare as our New York registrar and transfer agent. The holders of our shares may elect to be entered in one of the registers and to be transferred from time to time from one register to another register provided that our boardBoard of directorsDirectors may however impose transfer restrictions for shares that are registered, listed, quoted, dealt in, or have been placed in certain jurisdictions in compliance with the requirements applicable therein. The transfer to the register kept at the Company’s registered office may always be requested by a shareholder.
In addition, our articles of incorporation provide that our shares may be held through a securities settlement system or a professional depository of securities. Shares held in such manner have the same rights and obligations as shares recorded in our shareholder register(s) (subject to complying with certain formalities). Shares held through a securities settlement system or a professional depository of securities may be transferred in accordance with customary procedures for the transfer of securities in book-entry form.
Issuance of Shares
Pursuant to Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915 on commercial companies as amended, the issuance of shares in Adecoagro requires the approval by the general meeting of shareholders at the quorum and majority provided for the amendment of our articles of incorporation. See “—Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation” and “—General Meeting of Shareholders”.Shareholders." The general meeting of shareholders may however approve an authorized unissued share capital and authorize the boardBoard of directorsDirectors to issue
shares up to the maximum amount of such authorized unissued share capital for a maximum period of five years. The general meeting may amend, renew or extend such authorized share capital and authorization to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors to issue shares.
We have currently an authorized unissued share capital of $220,287,267,$220.3 million, including thean issued share capital as of December 31, 2019April 20, 2022 of $183,572,722.50,$167.1 million, and are authorized to issue up to 146,858,178 shares of a nominal value of $1.50 each (taking into account the shares already issued)currently issued shares) out of such authorized share capital. As of April 15, 202020, 2022, the un-issuedauthorized unissued share capital was $36,714,544.50.$53.2 million. Our board has been authorized to issue shares within the limits of the authorized un-issuedunissued share capital at such times and on such terms as the board or its delegates may decide for a period ending on April 10,15, 2025 (unless it is extended, amended or renewed and we currently intend to seek renewals and/or extensions as required from time to time).
Further, onOn April 15, 2020 the extraordinary meeting of shareholders adjusted the authorized un-issuedunissued share capital from the amount of $3,000,000,000 represented by two billion 2,000,000,000 shares of a nominal value of $1.50 each to $220,287,267$220.3 million represented by 146,858,178 shares of a nominal value of $1.50 each (which includes the issued share capital) and extended the validity period for 5five more years; until April 10,15, 2025. The extraordinary meeting of shareholders also resolved that the board may issue shares up to the total number of authorized un-issuedunissued shares until the latter date against contributions in cash or by way of incorporation of available reserves at such times and on such terms and conditions, including the issue price, as the Board of Directors or its delegate(s) may in its or their discretion resolve while reserving a preemptive subscription right to existing shareholders for any issue of shares.
Our articles provide that no fractional shares may be issued.
Our shares have no conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our common shares.
Preemptive Rights
Holders of our shares have a pro rata preemptive right to subscribe for any new shares issued for cash consideration.consideration or by way of incorporation of available reserves. Our articles provide that in the event of an increase of the issued share capital by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors within the limits of the authorized un-issuedunissued share capital preemptive rights shall always be reserved.
Repurchase of Shares
We cannot subscribe for our own shares.
We may, however, repurchase issued shares or have another person repurchase issued shares for our account, subject in particular to the following conditions:
•the prior authorization of the general meeting of shareholders (at the quorum and majority for ordinary resolutions), which authorization sets forth the terms and conditions of the proposed repurchase and in particular the maximum number of shares to be repurchased, the duration of the period for which the authorization is given (which may not exceed five years) and, in the case of repurchase for consideration, the minimum and maximum consideration per share, must have been obtained;
•the repurchase may not reduce our net assets on a non-consolidated basis to a level below the aggregate of the issued share capital andincreased by the reserves that we must maintain pursuant to Luxembourg law or its articles of incorporation; and
•only fully paid up shares may be repurchased.
The general meeting of shareholders has authorized that the Company, and/or any wholly-owned subsidiary (and/or any person acting on their behalf), may purchase, acquire, receive or hold shares in the Company under article 430-15 of the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915, as amended, from time to time up to 20%10% of the issued share capital, on the following terms and on such terms as referred to below and as shall further be determined by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of the Company, such authorization being valid (subject to renewal) for a period of five years from January 10, 2011. Such period was thereafter extended to end on April 21, 2026.
Additionally, on April 20, 2021.2022, the general meeting of shareholders authorized the Company, and/or any wholly-owned subsidiary (and/or any person acting on their behalf), to purchase, acquire, receive or hold shares in the Company under article 430-15 of the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915, as amended, from time to time, up to an additional 10% of the issued share capital, on such terms as determined by the Board of Directors of the Company. This authorization is valid for a period of five years from April 20, 2022.
Acquisitions may be made in any manner including without limitation, by tender or other offer(s),offers, buyback program(s),programs, over the stock exchange or in privately negotiated transactions or in any other manner as determined by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors (including derivative transactions or transactions having the same or similar economic effect than an acquisition).
In the case of acquisitions for value:
(i) in the case of acquisitions other than in the circumstances set forth under (ii), for a net purchase price being (x) no less than fifty per cent50% of the lowest stock price and (y) no more than fifty per cent50% above the highest stock price, in each case being the closing price, as reported by the New York City edition of the Wall Street Journal, or, if not reported therein, any other authoritative source to be selected by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of the Company (hereafter, the closing price), over the ten (10) trading days preceding the date of the purchase (or as the case may be the date of the commitment to the transaction);
(ii) in case of a tender offer (or if deemed appropriate by the boardBoard of directors,Directors, a buyback program),
a. in case of a formal offer being published, for a set net purchase price or a purchase price range, each time within the following parameters: no less than fifty per cent50% of the lowest stock price and (y) no more than fifty per cent50% above the highest stock price, in each case being the closing price over the ten (10) trading days preceding the publication date, provided however that if the stock exchange price during the offer period fluctuates by more than 10%, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may adjust the offer price or range to such fluctuations;
b. in case a public request for sell offers is made, a price range may be set (and revised by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors as deemed appropriate) provided that acquisitions may be made at a price which is no less than fifty per cent50% of the lowest stock price and (y) no more than fifty per cent50% above the highest stock price, in each case being the closing price over a period determined by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors provided that such period may not start more than five (5) trading days before the sell offer start date of the relevant offer and may not end after the last day of the relevant sell offer period.
In addition, pursuant to Luxembourg law the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may repurchase shares without the prior approval of the general meeting of shareholders if necessary to prevent serious and imminent harm to us or if the acquisition of shares has been made in view of the distribution thereof to the employees.
A share repurchase program was approved by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of the Company on September 12, 2013 to acquire up to 5% of the total outstanding share capital of the Company to be held as treasury shares (the “Share Repurchase Program”). The Share Repurchase Program was implemented in compliance with the authorization granted by the general meeting of shareholders of the Company, any applicable law, rules or regulations described above and the following limits approved by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of the Company. The Share Repurchase Program was approved for a period of 12 months from September 23, 2014 (the date of its announcement) or until reaching the maximum number of shares authorized under the Share Repurchase Program, whichever occurs first. In April 4, 2017, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors amended the Share Repurchase Program to include repurchases under Open Market Transactions, in reliance on the “safe harbour”harbor” from liability for manipulation provided by Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Securities Exchange Act”) and in privately negotiated transactions. The Share Repurchase Program was renewed by decision of the Board of Directors on August 13, 201910, 2021 for an additional period of 12 months, ending on September 23, 20202022 or until reaching the maximum number of shares authorized under the Program, whichever occurs first.
Capital Reduction
The articles of incorporation provide that the issued share capital may be reduced, subject to the approval by the general meeting of shareholders at the quorum and majority provided for the amendment of our articles of incorporation. See “—Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation” and “—General Meeting of Shareholders”.
General Meeting of Shareholders
In accordance with Luxembourg law and our articles of incorporation, any regularly constituted general meeting of shareholders of Adecoagro represents the entire body of shareholders of the Company. It shall have the broadest powers to order, carry out or ratify acts relating to the operations of the Company.
The annual general meeting of shareholders of Adecoagro as well as any other meetings of shareholders shall be held in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg at such place and time as indicated in the notice of the meeting.
Each of our shares entitles the holder thereof to attend our general meeting of shareholders, either in person or by proxy, to address the general meeting of shareholders, and to exercise voting rights, subject to the provisions of our articles of incorporation. Each share entitles the holder to one vote at a general meeting of shareholders. There is no minimum shareholding required to be able to attend or vote at a general meeting of shareholders.
A shareholder may act at any general meeting of shareholders by appointing another person (who need not be a shareholder) as his proxy, which proxy shall be in writing and comply with such requirements as determined by our board with respect to the attendance to the general meeting, and proxy forms in order to enable shareholders to exercise their right to vote. All proxies must be received by us (or our agents) no later than the day preceding the fifth (5th) working day before the date of the general meeting except if our boardBoard of directorsDirectors decides to change such time frame.
Our articles of incorporation provide that in the case of shares held through the operator of a securities settlement system or depository, a holder of such shares wishing to attend a general meeting of shareholders must receive from such operator or depository a certificate certifying the number of shares recorded in the relevant account on the blocking date and certifying that the shares in the account shall be blocked until the close of the general meeting. Such certificates should be submitted to us no later than the day preceding the fifth working day before the date of the general meeting unless our board fixes a different period.
Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors may determine a date preceding a general meeting as the record date for admission to such general meeting. When convening a general meeting of shareholders, we will publish the convening notice (which must be published at least fifteen days before the meeting) in the Recueil Électronique des Sociétés et Association, and in a Luxembourg newspaper and in the case the shares of the Company are listed on a regulated market, in accordance with the publicity requirements of such regulated market applicable to the Company. If all of the shareholders are present or represented at a general meeting of shareholders, the general meeting may be held without prior notice or publication. These convening notices must contain the agenda of the meeting and set out the conditions for attendance and representation at the meeting.
All materials relating to a general meeting of shareholders (including the notice) will be available at the website of Adecoagro at www.adecoagro.com and will be filed with the SEC on Form 6-K. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in, and does not constitute a part of, this annual report.
Luxembourg law provides that the boardBoard of directorsDirectors is obliged to convene a general meeting of shareholders if shareholders representing, in the aggregate, 10% of the issued share capital so require in writing with an indication of the agenda. In such case, the general meeting of shareholders must be held within one month of the request. If the requested general meeting of shareholders is not held within one month, shareholders representing, in the aggregate, 10% of the issued share capital, may petition the competent president of the district court in Luxembourg to have a court appointee convene the meeting. Luxembourg law provides that shareholders representing, in the aggregate, 10% of the issued share capital may request that additional items be added to the agenda of a general meeting of shareholders. That request must be made by registered mail sent to the registered office at least five days before the holding of the general meeting of shareholders.
Voting Rights
Each share of our shares entitles the holder thereof to one vote at a general meeting of shareholders.
Luxembourg law distinguishes between “ordinary” general meetings of shareholders and “extraordinary” general meetings of shareholders.
Extraordinary general meetings of shareholders are convened to resolve in particular upon an amendment to the articles of incorporation and certain other limited matters including those described below and are generally subject to the quorum and majority requirements described below. All other general meetings of shareholders are ordinary general meetings of shareholders.
Ordinary General Meetings of Shareholders. At an ordinary general meeting of shareholders there is no quorum requirement, and resolutions are adopted by a simple majority of the votes validly cast, irrespective of the number of shares represented. Abstentions are not considered “votes”.
Extraordinary General Meetings of Shareholders. An extraordinary general meeting of shareholders convened for the purpose of in particular (a) an increase or decrease of the authorized or issued share capital, (b) a limitation or exclusion of preemptive rights, (c) approving a legal merger or de-merger of Adecoagro, (d) dissolution of the Company or (e) an amendment of the articles of incorporation must generally have a quorum of at least 50% of our issued share capital except in limited circumstances provided for by Luxembourg law. If such quorum is not reached, the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders may be reconvened, pursuant to appropriate notification procedures, at a later date with no quorum requirement applying.
Irrespective of whether the proposed actions described in the preceding paragraph will be subject to a vote at the first or a subsequent extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, such actions are generally subject to the approval of at least two-thirds of the votes validly cast at such extraordinary general meeting of shareholders (except in limited circumstances provided for by Luxembourg law). Abstentions are not considered “votes”.
Appointment and Removal of Directors. Members of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may be elected by simple majority of the votes validly cast at any general meeting of shareholders. Under the articles of incorporation, all directors are elected for a period of up to three years with such possible extension as provided therein provided however the directors shall be elected on a staggered basis, with one third (1/3) of the directors being elected each year and provided further that such three year term may be exceeded by a period up to the annual general meeting held following the third anniversary of the appointment. Any director may be removed with or without cause by a simple majority vote at any general meeting of shareholders. The articles of incorporation provide that in case of a vacancy the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may co-opt a director.
Neither Luxembourg law nor our articles of incorporation contain any restrictions as to the voting of our shares by non-Luxembourg residents.
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
Luxembourg law requires an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders to resolve upon an amendment to the articles of incorporation. The agenda of the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders must indicate the proposed amendments to the articles of incorporation.
An extraordinary general meeting of shareholders convened for the purpose of amending the articles of incorporation must generally have a quorum of at least 50% of our issued share capital. If such quorum is not reached, the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders may be reconvened at a later date with no quorum according to the appropriate notification procedures. Irrespective of whether the proposed amendment will be subject to a vote at the first or a subsequent extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, the amendment is generally subject to the approval of at least two-thirds of the votes cast at such extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.
Any resolutions to amend the articles of incorporation must be taken before a Luxembourg notary and such amendments must be published in accordance with Luxembourg law.
Merger and Division
A merger by absorption whereby a Luxembourg company, after its dissolution without liquidation transfers to another company all of its assets and liabilities in exchange for the issuance to the shareholders of the company being acquired of shares in the acquiring company, or a merger effected by transfer of assets to a newly incorporated company, must, in principle, be approved by an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of the Luxembourg company to be held before a notary. Similarly the de-merger of a Luxembourg company is generally subject to the approval by an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.
Liquidation
In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of Adecoagro, the assets remaining after allowing for the payment of all liabilities will be paid out to the shareholders pro rata to their respective shareholdings. The decision to voluntarily liquidate, dissolve or wind-up require the approval by an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held before a notary.
No Appraisal Rights
Neither Luxembourg law nor our articles of incorporation provide for any appraisal rights of dissenting shareholders.
Distributions
Subject to Luxembourg law, each share is entitled to participate equally in distributions if and when if declared by the general meeting of shareholders out of funds legally available for such purposes. Pursuant to the articles of incorporation, the general meeting of shareholders may approve distributions and the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may declare interim distribution, to the extent permitted by Luxembourg law.
Declared and unpaid distributions held by us for the account of the shareholders shall not bear interest. Under Luxembourg law, claims for unpaid distributions will lapse in our favor five years after the date such distribution has been declared.
Annual Accounts
Each year the boardBoard of directorsDirectors must prepare annual accounts, that is, an inventory of the assets and liabilities of Adecoagro together with a balance sheet and a profit and loss account. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors must also prepare, each year, consolidated accounts and management reports on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts. The annual accounts, the consolidated accounts, the management report and the auditor’s reports must be available for inspection by shareholders at the registered office of Adecoagro at least 8eight calendar days prior to the date of the annual general meeting of shareholders.
The annual accounts and the consolidated accounts, after approval by the annual general meeting of shareholders, will need to be filed with the Luxembourg registry of trade and companies within one month after the approval and no more than seven months after the close of the financial year.
Information Rights
Luxembourg law gives shareholders limited rights to inspect certain corporate records 8eight calendar days prior to the date of the annual general meeting of shareholders, including the annual accounts with the list of directors and auditors, the consolidated accounts, the notes to the annual accounts and the consolidated accounts, a list of shareholders whose shares are not fully paid-up, the management reports, the auditor’s report and in case of amendments to the articles, the text of the proposed amendments and the draft of the resulting consolidated articles.
Any registered shareholder is entitled to receive a copy of the annual accounts, the consolidated accounts, the auditor’s reports and the management reports free of charge 8eight calendar days prior to the date of the annual general meeting of shareholders upon request.
Under Luxembourg law, it is generally accepted that a shareholder has the right to receive responses to questions concerning items on the agenda for a general meeting of shareholders, if such responses are necessary or useful for a shareholder to make an informed decision concerning such agenda item, unless a response to such questions could be detrimental to our interests.
One or more shareholders representing at least 10% of the share capital or 10% of the votes attached to all existing securities may ask the boardBoard of directorsDirectors written questions on one or more management operations (opérations de gestion) of the company and, as the case may be, of subsidiaries it controls. In the latter case, the request must be assessed in view of the interest of the companies included within the consolidation. In the absence of response within a period of one month, these shareholders may apply to the court for the appointment of experts instructed to submit a report on the management operations targeted in the question.
Board of Directors
The management of Adecoagro is vested in a boardBoard of directors.Directors. Our articles of incorporation provide that the board must comprise at least three members and no more than eleven members. The number of directors is determined and the directors are appointed at the general meeting of shareholders (except in case of a vacancy in the office of a director because of death, retirement, resignation, dismissal, removal or otherwise, the remaining directors may fill such vacancy and appoint a successor in accordance with applicable Luxembourg law).
The directors are appointed for a period of up to three years; provided however the directors shall be elected on a staggered basis, with one-third of the directors being elected each year and provided further that such three year term may be exceeded by a period up to the annual general meeting held following the third anniversary of the appointment. Directors may be removed with or without cause (ad nutum) by the general meeting of shareholders by a simple majority of votes cast at a general meeting of shareholders. The directors shall be eligible for re-election indefinitely. The general shareholders’ meeting may dismiss one or more directors at any time, with or without cause by a resolution passed by simple majority vote, irrespective of the number of shares present at such general shareholders’ meeting.
Currently our board has 9 members (see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Board of Directors”). The board meets as often as required by our interests.
A majority of the members of the board in office (and able to vote) present or represented at a board meeting constitutes a quorum, and resolutions are adopted by the simple majority vote of the board members present or represented (and able to vote). The board may also take decisions by means of resolutions in writing signed by all directors.
Our board may delegate the daily management of the business of Adecoagro, as well as the power to represent Adecoagro in its day to dayday-to-day business, to individual directors or other officers or agents of the Company (with power to sub-delegate). In addition, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may delegate the daily management of the business of Adecoagro, as well as the power to represent
Adecoagro in its day to dayday-to-day business to an executive or other committee as it deems fit. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors shall determine the conditions of appointment and dismissal as well as the remuneration and powers of any person or persons so appointed.
Currently the boardBoard of directorsDirectors has appointed the officers listed under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management.”
The boardBoard of directorsDirectors may (but shall not be obliged to unless required by law) establish one or more committees (including without limitation an audit committee, a risk and commercial committee, a strategy committee and a compensation committee) and for which it shall, if one or more of such committees are set up, appoint the members (who may be but do not need to be board members), determine the purpose, powers and authorities as well as the procedures and such other rules as may be applicable thereto (subject as to the audit committee as set forth therein).
Currently our board has set up an audit committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.” Our board has set up a compensation committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.” Our board has set up a risk and commercial committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.” Our board has set up a strategy committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.”
No director or member of any committee shall, solely as a result of being a director, be prevented from contracting with us, either with regard to his tenure of any office or place of profit or as vendor, purchaser or in any other manner whatsoever, nor shall any contract in which any director or member of any committee is in any way interested be liable to be avoided, in account of his position as director or member of any committee nor shall any director or member of any committee who is so interested be liable to account for us or the shareholders for any remuneration, profit or other benefit realized by the contract by reason of the director or member of any committee holding that office or of the fiduciary relationship thereby established.
Any director or, as the case may be, member of any committee having a direct or indirect interest in a transaction conflicting with our interest, which has to be considered by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors or the relevant committee, as the case may be, shall be obliged to advise the board or the committee thereof and to cause a record of his statement to be included in the minutes of the meeting. He may not take part in these deliberations nor in the vote of the resolution. At the next following general meeting or boardBoard of directors’Directors’ meeting, before any resolution is put to vote, a special report shall be made on any transactions in which any of the directors or members of any committee may have had an interest conflicting with our interest.
No shareholding qualification for directors is required.
Directors and other officers, past and present, are entitled to indemnification from us to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability and all expenses reasonably incurred by him in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he is involved by virtue of his being or having been a director. We may purchase and maintain for any director or other officer insurance against any such liability.
No indemnification shall be provided against any liability to us or our shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his office. No indemnification will be provided in the event of a settlement (unless approved by a court of competent jurisdiction or the board), nor will indemnification be provided in proceedings in which that director or officer has been finally adjudicated to have acted in bad faith and not in the interest of the Company.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common shares is Computershare. The holders of our shares may elect to be entered in one of the registers and to be transferred from time to time from one register to another register provided that our boardBoard of directorsDirectors may however impose transfer restrictions for shares that are registered, listed, quoted, dealt in, or have been placed in certain jurisdictions in compliance with the requirements applicable therein. The transfer to the register kept in Luxembourg may always be requested by a shareholder.
C.MATERIAL CONTRACTS
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview.Overview—Material Agreements.”
D.EXCHANGE CONTROLS
In 1991, the Argentine Convertibility Law established a fixed exchange rate according to which the Argentine Central Bank was statutorily obliged to sell U.S. dollars to any individual at a fixed exchange rate of Ps.1.00 per US$1.00.$1.00. In 2001 Argentina experienced a period of severe political, economic and social crisis, and on January 6, 2002, the Argentine congress enacted the Public Emergency Law abandoning more than ten years of fixed Peso-U.S. dollar parity. After devaluing the Peso and setting the official exchange rate at Ps.1.40 per US$1.00,$1.00, on February 11, 2002, the Argentine government allowed the Peso to float. The shortage of U.S. dollars and their heightened demand caused the Peso to further devaluate significantly in the first half of 2002. The Argentine Central Bank may indirectly affect this market through its active participation. Due to the deterioration of the economic and financial situation in Argentina during 2001 and 2002, in addition to the abandonment of the Peso-U.S. dollar parity, the Argentine government established a number of monetary and currency exchange control measures, including a partial freeze on bank deposits, the suspension on payments of its sovereign foreign debt, restrictions on the transfer of funds out of, or into, Argentina, and the creation of the Single Free Foreign Exchange Market (“Mercado Único y Libre de Cambios,”, or the “FX Market” which now is called “Mercado Libre de Cambios”) through which FX Market all purchases and sales of foreign currency must be made. The Argentine Central Bank may indirectly affect this market through its active participation.
Although since 2003 these restrictions had beenwere progressively eased to some extent, as a consequence of the increase of the demand in Argentina for U.S. dollars and the capital flow out of Argentina, the Argentine government imposed during 2011 some additional restrictions on the transfer of funds from Argentina and reduced the time required to comply with the mandatory transfer of funds into Argentina.
Most foreign exchange restrictions and restrictions on transfer of funds into and out of Argentina that had been enacted since 2011, were lifted by the Macri administration in December 2016, reestablishing Argentine residents’ rights to purchase and remit outside of Argentina foreign currency with no maximum amount and without specific allocation or prior approval.
GivenDue to the foreign exchange crisis occurred in Argentina after the primary elections that were held in Argentina in August 2019 and the uncertainties on the presidential elections in October 2019 and the measures to be adopted by the potentiala new administration, since September 1, 2019 and effective initially until December 31, 2019, the Macri Administration, by means of Decree No. 609/2019 (“Decree 609”)Argentine Central Bank reinstated rigid restrictions and foreign exchange controls, which have been extended without time limitation by means of Decree No. 91/2019 issued on December 28, 2019 by the Argentine Executive Power, and Communication “A” 6862 issued by the Argentine Central Bank on January 15, 2020. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to be implementedthe Countries in Which We Operate—Economic and political conditions in the countries in which we operate, and the perception of these conditions in international markets, may adversely impact our business, our access to the capital and debt markets, our results of operations and financial condition.”
Pursuant to these measures, as further amended and complemented from September 1, 2019time to time, and effective until December 31, 2019, which were then extended andother additional measures adopted by the Argentine Central Bank, the main foreign exchange regulations that are in forceplace as of the date of this report.report are as follows:
Pursuant to these measures:
•The exchange controls were reinstated.
•Argentine individuals must obtain prior approval from(a) Prior authorization of the Argentine Central Bank is required for the creation of external assets, the remittance of family aid and for entering into derivative transactions, in case the aggregate amount of the above-mentioned transactions exceeds the equivalent of US$ 200 per month in all entities licensed to operate in foreign exchange transactions.
•Export of services: the collections of foreign currency by Argentine residents out of Argentina for the export of services are subject to mandatory repatriation within the 5 consecutive days computed from the date of payment or collection.
•Import of services: access to the FX Market for the purchase of foreign currency:
• For portfolio investment purposes for more than US$200 per calendar month by individuals who are Argentine residents;
• For portfolio investment purposes by legal entities, local governments, funds and trusts;
• By non-Argentine residents, except for certain exemptions;
• For payment of dividends, except that no such prior authorization is grantedrequired for the payment of debts relateddividends to the import of services if the compliance with the foreign indebtedness information regime before the Argentine Central Bank is proved.
•Financial foreign indebtedness: for new financings as from September 2, 2019, the obligation to transfer to Argentina and sell for Argentine pesos in the FX Market is required to access the FX Market to pay principal and interest.
•Dividends and earnings: access to the FX Market is granted for payments under these conceptsshareholders who are non-Argentine residents as from January 17, 2020, in an amount that (including the amount of the payment being made at the time of the access) does not exceed 30% of the value of new capital contributions of foreign direct investments. These contributions must behave been made to the local company and must behave been transferred tointo Argentina and sold for Argentine pesosPesos through the FX Market as from such date.date, and comply with the rest of the requirements provided in the regulations;
•All For the pre-payment of principal and interest on foreign financial indebtedness with an anticipation of more than three business days in advance to the scheduled maturity dates, unless certain conditions are met;
• For the pre-payment of indebtedness for the import of goods and services, except for certain exemptions;
• For the payment of services with related foreign parties, except for certain exemptions, and;
• Until June 30, 2021 for the payment of principal under foreign financial indebtedness with related parties, except for certain exemptions.
(b) Regarding the repayment of principal and interest of foreign financial indebtedness, the proceeds of foreign financial loans incurred since September 1, 2019 must be transferred into Argentina and converted into Argentine Pesos through the FX Market in order for the Argentine resident debtor to then have access to the FX Market for the repayment of principal and interest under such foreign financial loan on their scheduled maturity. For such purposes, the loan must be declared within the Survey of Foreign Assets and Liabilities (Relevamiento de activos y pasivos externos).
(c) Access to the FX market for the purchase of foreign currency is prohibited for the repayment of local debts and other obligations incurred in foreign currency between Argentine residents as from September 1, 2019, except, among other cases, notfor obligations instrumented by means of public registries or deeds as of August 30, 2019.
(d) The proceeds obtained from the collections of foreign currency by Argentine residents outside of Argentina for the export of the following goods since September 2, 2019 are subject to mandatory transfer into Argentina and conversion into Argentine pesos through the FX Market, within the terms described in each case, computed from the shipment date:
• 15 calendar days for crops and soybean oil;
• 30 calendar days for hydrocarbons and derivatives;
• 60 calendar days for exports between related parties not including the goods described above and for metal ores and precious metals;
• 180 calendar days for all other goods; and
• 365 calendar days for small exports under the EXPORTA SIMPLE program for medium and small companies with annual FOB exports of less than $600,000 and individual exports of less than $15,000 each.
Regardless of the applicable maximum terms described above, upon collection of the export receivables, the proceeds thereof are subject to the mandatory repatriation within the five calendar days computed from the date of payment or collection.
(e) The proceeds from the collection of foreign currency by Argentine residents outside of Argentina for the export of services are subject to mandatory repatriation and conversion into Argentine pesos through the FX Market within five business days computed from the date they are received.
(f) As a general rule, Argentine residents may access the FX Market for the payment of imports of goods. Different requirements apply for goods with customs entry registration and goods with pending customs entry registration. The Argentine importer may access the FX Market to pay imports of goods with customs entry registration registered in the import payment tracking system (Seguimiento de Pago de Importaciones or “SEPAIMPO,” after its Spanish acronym), provided that certain requirements are met, including, among others, the payment is not made before the scheduled maturity date. Payments must be made to the foreign supplier. Goods with pending customs entry registration are subject to a special follow-up regime. In addition, the prior authorization of the Argentine Central Bank regulationsis required for the import of luxury goods such as luxury cars and motorbikes, pearls and diamonds, among other luxury goods.
(g) Pursuant to Communication “A” 7030, as amended, the Argentine Central Bank provided that, until June 30, 2022, with certain limited exceptions, access to the FX Market for the payment of importing certain goods or the payment of principal of debts resulting from the import of goods will requirebe subject to the prior approval of the Argentine Central Bank.
•ExportBank, except where, among other things, the party files an affidavit stating that the aggregate amount of goods: collections shall be transferredpayments of imports made by such party since January 1, 2020 (including the payment requested) does not exceed US$250,000. Such amount is calculated as the aggregate amount of imports nationalized by the party between January 1, 2020 and sold for Argentine pesos in the FX Marketdate immediately prior to the terms described in the regulations, depending on the typedate of good.
•Import of goods: access to the FX Market, isplus payments made for other imports not included in the foregoing calculation, less the amount of payments pending for imports with nationalization made between September 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.
(h) Communication “A” 7030 of the Argentine Central Bank, dated May 28, 2020, as amended, provides that, for purposes of accessing the FX Market for making payments of, among others things, imports of goods, services rendered by non-Argentine residents, interests in connection with the import of goods and services, dividends and other earnings distributions, principal and interest on financial debt, payment of debt securities with public registry in Argentina, or for making international portfolio investments or transactions with derivatives by legal entities, other purchases of foreign currency for specific allocation and premium, guarantees and payments on interest hedging transactions, the party will be required to file an
affidavit (i) stating, that as of such date, all of such party’s holdings of foreign currency in Argentina are deposited with Argentine financial institutions and that it does not have foreign liquid disposable assets (including, among others, foreign currency, gold and savings and checking deposits in non-Argentine financial institutions) for an equivalent of more than US$100,000; and (ii) committing to transfer into Argentina and settle for Argentine pesos any funds in foreign currency received outside of Argentina resulting from the collection of loans granted to third parties, the collection of deposits or the collection of the proceeds resulting from a sale of an asset, when the loan was granted, the deposit was made or the asset was acquired, respectively, after May 28, 2020.
(i) On September 15, 2020, by means of Communication “A” 7106, the Argentine Central Bank restricted the access to FX Market for the payment of importprincipal under foreign financial debt with third parties (other than debt with international or multilateral credit organizations) in excess of goodsUS$2,000,000 per month in the aggregate with maturities becoming due between October 15, 2020 and June 30, 2022 to an amount equal to up to 40% of the principal amount originally due; and provided that the remaining unpaid principal balance is refinanced through a new foreign financial debt with an average life of at least two years, with certain limited exceptions. For this purpose, the entities qualifying under this situation were requested to submit a refinancing plan within such guidelines. Similar restrictions and request for a refinancing plan were also put in place for those entities with maturities of principal becoming due between April 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021 (as provided by Communication “A” 7230), for which purposes the Central Bank implemented certain changes with respect to the previous measure. The Argentine Central Bank authorized the prepayment of principal and interest under foreign financial indebtedness in connection with the refinancing described in this paragraph for up to 45 calendar days from the original stated maturity, subject to compliance with certain additional requirements. The Argentine Central Bank also allowed the prepayment of interests on foreign financial indebtedness when such prepayment is implemented in connection with the exchange of debt securities and certain conditionsadditional requirements are met. In addition, pursuant to Communication “A” 7218, dated February 4, 2021, the Argentine Central Bank allowed Argentine residents to access the FX Market for the payment of principal and interest under debt securities registered outside of Argentina and issued as from February 5, 2021, and that are partially subscribed in foreign currency in Argentina, subject to certain requirements.
•
(j) The access to the FX Market for the purchase of foreign currency for any of the payments described above is subject to the compliance with the foreign indebtedness information regime before the Argentine Central Bank.
On December 5, 2019, In addition, to access the FX Market, importers and exporters must register with the Registry created by the Argentine Central Bank issued Communique “A” 6844,containing foreign exchange data on exporters and importers. Any person included in the list to be published by means of which it provided a consolidated text containing all measures adopted since the reinstatement ofArgentine Central Bank will be deemed as an obliged party (sujetos obligados) and must be listed in the Registry before April 30, 2021 if they wish to access the foreign exchange controlsmarket as from September, 2019.May 1, 2021 for transactions involving outflows of funds including swaps and arbitrages. This requirement will not apply when accessing the FX Market for repayment of foreign currency financings granted by local financial entities.
On
Since December 28,21, 2019, the Fernández Administration, through Decree No. 91/2019 (“Decree 91”), amended Article 1Argentine Congress has passed the Social Solidarity Law, which, among other things, provided a new 30% tax on the purchase by Argentine residents of Decree 609, which provided that, until December 31, 2019,foreign currency for portfolio purposes, the exchange value (“contravalor”) of exportacquisition of goods and services with credit and debit cards, and any payments in connection with international passenger transportation. Digital services rendered from outside Argentina (such as hosting, web services, software as a service, streaming services, etc.) are subject to a reduced tax rate of 8.0%.
By resolution of the CNV No. 878/2021, dated January 11, 2021, the CNV established that, with certain limited exceptions, in order to process any instruction for the sale of securities acquired with Argentine pesos for U.S. dollars outside of Argentina, or for the transfer of those securities to depositories outside of Argentina, the securities must be transferred to Argentina and soldhave been held for Pesosat least three business days since the date of their credit in the FX Market. By meansdepository’s custody account.
Law No. 19,359 (revised text pursuant to Decree No. 480/95 and complementary regulations) provides penalties for the infringement of this amendment, such obligation was extended over time, with no expiration date. The recitalsany foreign exchange regulations. Penalties include fines of Decree 91 state thatup to a tenfold increase in the continuityamount of said obligations is necessary since the economic-financial situation that motivatedinfringing transaction, temporary suspensions, disqualification for up to ten years preventing the issuanceinfringing party from acting as importer, exporter and/or as foreign exchange institution, or even prison in event of Decree 609 has not been overcome.recidivism.
Furthermore,For additional information regarding all current foreign exchange restrictions and exchange control regulations in Argentina, investors should consult their legal advisors and read the applicable rules mentioned herein, as well as any amendments and complementary regulations, which are available at the Argentine Central Bank, through Communique “A” 6854 of December 27, 2019, extended, as from December 31, 2019 and with no expiration date, the effectiveness of foreign exchange regulations which does not correspond to the obligation to transfer to Argentina and sell in the FX Market the collection of exports of goods and services. Lastly, in line with Decree 91, the Argentine Central Bank issued Communique “A” 6856 by means of which, it extended, as from December 31, 2019 and with no expiration date, the effectiveness of foreign exchange regulations relating to the obligation to transfer to Argentina and sell in the foreign exchange market the exchange value (“contravalor”) of exports of goods and services.Bank's website: www.bcra.gob.ar.
Foreign indebtedness information regime
Communique “A” 6401 of the Argentine Central Bank established a reporting regime applicable as of December 31, 2017 for individuals, entities and estates residing in Argentina (the “Obliged Subjects”). The Obliged Subjects must file annual
and quarterly or only annual statements with the Argentine Central Bank if the sum of their flows regarding foreign assets and liabilities during the previous calendar year, or their balance of foreign assets and liabilities at the end of the previous calendar year amount to:
•US$50,000,000 or more, in which case a quarterly statement must be filed in advance at each quarter, in addition to the annual statement (which may in turn complement and/or ratify the quarterly statements).
•Between US$10,000,000 and US$50,000,000, in which case only an annual statement must be filed.
•Between US$1,000,000 and US$10,000,000, in which case only an annual statement must be filed, with an option to use a simplified version of the statement.
The deadlines for submitting the statements will be of 180 calendar days as from the end of the calendar year for annual statements, and 45 calendar days as from the end of the respective quarter for quarterly statements.
Communique “A” 6401 also provides certain definitions and clarifications regarding the five items to be informed, and some concepts such as “residence” and “foreign assets or liabilities”.
For additional information regarding all current foreign exchange restrictions and exchange control regulations in Argentina, investors should consult their legal advisors and read the applicable rules mentioned herein, as well as any amendments and complementary regulations, which are available at the Argentine Ministry of Treasury’s website: www.economia.gob.ar, or the Argentine Central Bank’s website: www.bcra.gob.ar.
E.TAXATION
MATERIAL LUXEMBOURG TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR HOLDERS OF COMMON SHARES
The following is a summary discussion of certain Luxembourg tax considerations of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of your shares that may be applicable to you if you acquire our shares. This does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to any of the Company’s common shares, and does not purport to
include tax considerations that arise from rules of general application or that are generally assumed to be known to holders. This discussion is not a complete analysis or listing of all of the possible tax consequences of such transactions and does not address all tax considerations that might be relevant to particular holders in light of their personal circumstances or to persons that are subject to special tax rules.
It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice. This discussion is based on Luxembourg laws and regulations as they stand on the date of this annual report and is subject to any change in law or regulations or changes in interpretation or application thereof (and which may possibly have a retroactive effect). Prospective investors should therefore consult their own professional advisers as to the effects of state, local or foreign laws and regulations, including Luxembourg tax law and regulations, to which they may be subject.
As used herein, a “Luxembourg individual” means an individual resident in Luxembourg who is subject to personal income tax (impôt sur le revenu) on his or her worldwide income from Luxembourg or foreign sources, and a “Luxembourg corporate holder” means a company (that is, a fully taxable entity within the meaning of Article 159 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law) resident in Luxembourg subject to corporate income tax (impôt sur le revenu des collectivités) on its worldwide income from Luxembourg or foreign sources. For purposes of this summary, Luxembourg individuals and Luxembourg corporate holders are collectively referred to as “Luxembourg Holders”.Holders." A “non-Luxembourg Holder” means any investor in shares of Adecoagro other than a Luxembourg Holder.
Tax regime applicable to realized capital gains
Luxembourg Holders
Luxembourg resident individual holders
Capital gains realized by Luxembourg resident individuals who do not hold their shares as part of a commercial or industrial business and who hold no more than 10% of the share capital of the Company will only be taxable if they are realized on a sale of shares that takes place before their acquisition or within the first six months following their acquisition.
Luxembourg resident corporate holders
Capital gains realized upon the disposal of shares by a fully taxable resident corporate holder will in principle be subject to corporate income tax and municipal business tax. The combined applicable rate (including an unemployment fund contribution) is 24.94% for the fiscal year ending 2020 for a corporate holder established in Luxembourg-City. An exemption from such taxes may be available to the holder pursuant to article 166 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law subject to the fulfilmentfulfillment of the conditions set forth therein. The scope of the capital gains exemption can be limited in the cases provided by the Grand Ducal Decree of December 21, 2001.
Non-Luxembourg Holders
An individual who is a non-Luxembourg Holder of shares (and who does not have a permanent establishment, a permanent representative or a fixed place of business in Luxembourg) will only be subject to Luxembourg taxation on capital gains arising upon disposal of such shares if such holder has (together with his or her spouse and underage children) directly or indirectly held more than 10% of the capital of Adecoagro at any time during the past five years, and either (i) such holder has been a resident of Luxembourg for tax purposes for at least 15 years and has become a non-resident within the last five years preceding the realization of the gain, subject to any applicable tax treaty, or (ii) the disposal of shares occurs within six months from their acquisition (or prior to their actual acquisition), subject to any applicable tax treaty.
A corporate non-Luxembourg Holder (that is, an entity within the meaning of Article 159 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law), which has a permanent establishment, a permanent representative or a fixed place of business in Luxembourg to which shares are attributable, will bear corporate income tax and municipal business tax on a gain realized on a disposal of such shares as set forth above for a Luxembourg corporate holder. However, gains realized on the sale of the shares may benefit from the full exemption provided for by Article 166 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law and by the Grand Ducal Decree of December 21, 2001 subject in each case to fulfillment of the conditions set out therein.
A corporate non-Luxembourg Holder, which has no permanent establishment in Luxembourg to which the shares are attributable, will bear corporate income tax on a gain realized on a disposal of such shares under the same conditions applicable to an individual non-Luxembourg Holder, as set out above. In principle a corporate non-Luxembourg holders is only subject to taxation under (ii) above and not to taxation under (i) above. This result obtains from the provision that when a corporate Luxembourg
holder migrates abroad and becomes a corporate non-Luxembourg holders, at that moment in time such holder is deemed liquidated for Luxembourg tax purposes and taxation applies at the moment in time.
Tax regime applicable to distributions
Withholding tax
Distributions imputed for tax purposes on newly accumulated profits are subject to a withholding tax of 15%. The rate of the withholding tax may be reduced pursuant to double tax avoidance treaty existing between Luxembourg and the country of residence of the relevant holder, subject to the fulfilmentfulfillment of the conditions set forth therein.
No withholding tax applies if the distribution is made to (i) a Luxembourg resident corporate holder (that is, a fully taxable entity within the meaning of Article 159 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law), (ii) an undertaking of collective character which is resident of a Member State of the European Union and is referred to by article 2 of the Council Directive of 2011/96 concerning the common fiscal regime applicable to parent and subsidiary companies of different member states of November 20, 2011 (the "Parent Subsidiary Directive"), (iii) a corporation or a cooperative company resident in Norway, Iceland or Liechtenstein and subject to a tax comparable to corporate income tax as provided by the Luxembourg Income Tax Law, (iv) an undertaking with a collective character subject to a tax comparable to corporate income tax as provided by the Luxembourg Income Tax Law which is resident in a country that has concluded a tax treaty with Luxembourg, (v) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of one of the afore-mentionedaforementioned categories and (vi) a corporation company resident in Switzerland which is subject to corporate income tax in Switzerland without benefiting from an exemption, provided that at the date of payment, the holder holds or commits to hold directly or through a tax transparent vehicle, during an uninterrupted period of at least twelve months, shares representing at least 10% of the share capital of Adecoagro or acquired for an acquisition price of at least EUR 1,200,000, and provided that the dividend recipient is not excluded to benefit from the Parent Subsidiary Directive under its mandatory general anti-avoidance rule, as implemented in Luxembourg.
Luxembourg Holders
With the exception of a Luxembourg corporate holdersholder benefitting from the exemption referred to above, Luxembourg individual holders, and Luxembourg corporate holders subject to Luxembourg corporation taxes, must include the distributions paid on the shares in their taxable income, 50% of the amount of such dividends being exempted from tax. The applicable withholding tax can, under certain conditions, entitle the relevant Luxembourg Holder to a tax credit.
Net wealth tax
Luxembourg Holders
Luxembourg net wealth tax will not be levied on a Luxembourg Holder with respect to the shares held unless (i) the Luxembourg Holder is a legal entity subject to net wealth tax in Luxembourg; or (ii) the shares are attributable to an enterprise or part thereof which is carried on through a permanent establishment, a fixed place of business or a permanent representative in Luxembourg.
Net wealth tax is levied annually at the rate depending on the amount the net wealth of enterprises resident in Luxembourg or, a reduced rate of 0.05% for the portion of the net wealth exceeding EUR 500 million, as determined for net wealth tax purposes (i.e. 0.5% on an amount up to EUR 500 million and 0.05% on the amount of taxable net wealth exceeding EUR 500 million). The shares may be exempt from net wealth tax subject to the conditions set forth by Paragraph 60 of the Law of October 16, 1934 on the valuation of assets (Bewertungsgesetz), as amended.
Non-Luxembourg Holders
Luxembourg net wealth tax will not be levied on a non-Luxembourg Holder with respect to the shares held unless the shares are attributable to an enterprise or part thereof which is carried on through a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in Luxembourg.
United States Federal Income Taxation of the Company
Our business assets and properties are located, and all of our employees and executives are based outside the United States. Our business is directly conducted through operating companies organized under the laws of countries other than the United States. These non-U.S. operating companies are indirectly owned by Adecoagro LP SCS, a holding company which is a societesociété commandite
simple organized under the laws of Luxembourg. As a partnership that is not engaged in a trade or business within the United States within the meaning of section 864 of the Internal Revenue Code, Adecoagro LP SCS is not itself subject to U.S. federal net income taxes. We acquired approximately 98 percent of Adecoagro LP SCS´s,SCS’s, predecessor company, IFH, prior to undertaking the IPO in exchange for our stock.
Under rules to prevent expatriation of and by U.S. corporations and certain U.S. partnerships under Internal Revenue Code section 7874(b), we would be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation if for this purpose (i) we were deemed to have acquired substantially all of the assets constituting the trade or business of a U.S. domestic partnership and (ii) former members of IFH were deemed to own at least 80% of our stock by reason of the transfer of those trade or business assets (ignoring stock issued in the IPO for purposes of the 80% threshold) and (iii) we were found not to conduct substantial business activities in Luxembourg. In that event, we would be subject to U.S. federal net income tax on our worldwide income and dividends we pay to non-U.S. shareholders would be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate (subject to reduction, to the extent the beneficial owner of the dividend is entitled to claim a reduced rate of withholding under an applicable income tax treaty).
We believe that the restructuring transactions executed prior to or in connection with the IPO should not be subject to section 7874(b). Accordingly, we do not believe that we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our worldwide income nor do we anticipate paying dividends subject to U.S. federal withholding tax. However, the relevant rules are unclear in certain respects and there is limited guidance on the application of the rules to acquisitions of partnerships or partnership assets constituting a trade or business. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the IRS will not seek to assert that we are a U.S. domestic corporation, which assertion if successful could materially increase our U.S. federal income tax liability. Prospective holders who are non-United States persons should also note that, in that event, we would be required to withhold tax from any dividends we pay to non-U.S. Holders (subject to any applicable income tax treaties applicable to those non-U.S. Holders).
Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors about the possible application of section 7874. The remainder of this discussion assumes that we are not treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders
The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common shares. This discussion applies only to beneficial owners of common shares that are “U.S. Holders” (as defined below), who have purchased our common shares in the open market and that hold our common shares as “capital assets” for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, property held for investment). This discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”), its legislative history, final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, administrative pronouncements, and judicial decisions, and the income tax treaty between Luxembourg and the United States (the “Treaty”), all as of the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change and to differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). No ruling has been sought from the IRS with respect to any U.S. federal income tax consequences described below, and there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court will not take a contrary position.
This discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular holder based on its particular circumstances with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares, and you are urged to consult your own tax advisor regarding your specific tax situation, including the potential impact of recently enacted legislation (P.L. 115-97) commonly referred to as the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (the “Act”).situation. For example, the discussion does not address the tax considerations that may be relevant to U.S. Holders in special tax situations, such as:
•insurance companies;
•tax-exempt organizations (including private foundations)entities, “individual retirement accounts” or “Roth IRAs”;
•brokers or dealers in securities or currencies and traders in securities that elect to mark tomark-to- market;
•banks and financial institutions;
•partnerships or other pass-through entities (or a person holding our common shares through a partnership or other pass-through entity or arrangement treated as such);
•real estate investment trusts and regulated investment companies;
•companies that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax;
•persons who acquire common shares through the exercise of employee share options or other compensation: arrangements;
•persons liable for alternative minimum tax;
•S corporations;
•accrual-method taxpayers subject to special tax accounting rules under Section 451(b) of the Code;
•holders whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar or that hold shares through non-U.S. brokers of other non-U.S. intermediaries;
•certain former U.S. citizens or residents or U.S. expatriates;
•holders that hold our common shares as part of a hedge, straddle or conversion or other integrated transaction;
•holders that purchase or sell our common shares as part of a wash sale for U.S. federal income tax purposes; or
•holders that own, directly, indirectly, or constructively, 10% or more of the total combined voting power or value of our common shares.
This discussion does not address the alternative minimum tax consequences of owning common shares or the indirect consequences to holders of equity interests in partnerships or other entities that own our common shares. Moreover, this discussion does not address the state, local and foreign tax consequences of acquiring, owning, or disposing of our common shares, or any aspect of U.S. federal tax law (such as the estate, generation-skipping and gift tax) other than U.S. federal income taxation.
You are a “U.S. Holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common shares and you are, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
a corporation, or any other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any State thereof, including the District of Columbia;
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
a trust (a) if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or (b) that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If a partnership (or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) owns our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A partnership that owns our common shares, and partners in such a partnership, should consult their own tax advisors regarding their specific tax situations, includingsituations.
This discussion does not address the potential impactalternative minimum tax consequences of owning common shares or the indirect consequences to holders of equity interests in partnerships or other entities that own our common shares. Moreover, this
discussion does not address the state, local and foreign tax consequences of acquiring, owning, or disposing of our common shares, or any aspect of U.S. federal tax law (such as the estate, generation-skipping and gift tax) other than U.S. federal income taxation.
You are a “U.S. Holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common shares who is eligible for the benefits of the Act.
Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) Rules
U.S. Holders generally will be subject to a special, generally adverse tax regime that would differ in certain material respects from the tax treatment described below if weTreaty and you are, or were to become, a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.purposes:
In general, we will be
•an individual who is a PFICcitizen or resident of the United States;
•a corporation, or any other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any State thereof, including the District of Columbia; or
•an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.
Treasury regulations that apply to taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021 may in some circumstances prohibit a U.S. person from claiming a foreign tax credit with respect to acertain non-U.S. taxes that are not creditable under applicable income tax treaties. Accordingly, U.S. Holder if, for any taxable year in which the U.S. Holder held our common shares, either (i) at least 75% of our gross income for the taxable year is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) of our assets during such taxable year is attributable to assetsinvestors that produce or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, “passive income” generally includes, among other things and subject to certain exceptions, dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities, gains from commodities and securities transactions, net foreign currency gains and net gains from assets that produce passive income. If a foreign corporation owns at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation, the foreign corporation is treated for purposes of the PFIC tests as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation, and as receiving directly its proportionate share of the other corporation’s income.
If we were to be treated as a PFIC, gain realized on the sale or other disposition of your common shares would in general not be treated as capital gain that is eligible for preferential tax rates in the case of individual, trust or estate U.S. Holders. Instead, if you are a U.S. Holder, unless you make a timely “mark-to-market” election electing to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to your common shares, or you make a timely “qualified electing fund” election electing to be taxed annually on the earnings and gains of the PFIC attributable to your common shares (irrespective of distributions), you would be treated as if you had realized such gain ratably over your holding period in the common shares and would be taxed at the highest tax rate in
effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year except for the current year. In addition, unless you make a timely “mark-to-market” election or “qualified electing fund” election, distributions that you receive from us as a direct or indirect U.S. Holder will not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income if we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at the tax rates applicable to ordinary income, and to the extent they are treated as “excess distributions” under the PFIC rules, they will also be subject to the PFIC interest charge described above. A U.S. Holder will be required to make an annual filing with the IRS if such holder holds common shares in any year in which we are classified as a PFIC. With certain exceptions, your common shares will continue to be treated as stock in a PFIC if we were a PFIC at any time during your holding period in your common shares even if we no longer meet the PFIC tests in a later year.
Although the determination of whether a corporation is a PFIC is made annually, and thus may be subject to change, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our most recently completed taxable year, nor that we will be one for our current taxable year. The U.S. federal income tax rules relating to PFICs are complex. Prospective U.S. investors are urged toTreaty benefits should consult their own tax advisers with respectregarding the creditability or deductibility of any non-U.S. taxes imposed on them. This discussion does not apply to the application of the PFIC rules to their investmentinvestors in our common shares. The remainder of this discussion assumes that we are not a PFIC.special situation.
Taxation of Dividends
UnderSubject to the PFIC rules discussed below, under the U.S. federal income tax laws and subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, distributions with respect to our common shares (other than certain pro rata distributions of common shares) made to U.S. Holders will, to the extent made from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes that are taxable to the U.S. Holder. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares and thereafter as capital gain from the sale or exchange of the common shares. We do not currently maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Unless and until these calculations are made, distributions should be presumed to be taxable dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As used below, the term “dividend” means a distribution that constitutes a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Dividends (including amounts withheld on account of foreign taxes) paid with respect to our common shares generally will be includible in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as ordinary income on the day on which the dividends are actually or constructively received by the U.S. Holder. Dividends with respect to our common shares will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S. corporations or certain foreign corporations.
If you are an individual, trust or estate U.S. Holder,Subject to applicable limitations, dividends paid on the common shares that constituteto certain non-corporate U.S. Holders may be eligible for taxation as “qualified dividend income” willand therefore may be taxable to you at the preferential rates of taxation applicable to long-term capital gains. Dividends paid ongains, provided that our common shares will be treated as “qualified dividend income” if:
the common shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States or (b)States. In order to qualify for qualified dividend income treatment, U.S. Holders must meet certain holding period requirements, and we are eligible for benefits of the income tax treaty between Luxembourg and the United States (the “Treaty”);
we aremust not be classified as a PFIC in the current or prior year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and are not, inof the year in which the dividend is paid, a PFIC;
the U.S. Holder holds the common shares for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet other holding period requirements;
the U.S. Holder is not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property.
We believe that our common shares should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “-Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) Rules” above.
Aspaid. The NYSE, on which our common shares are listed, on the New York Stock Exchange and should qualify as readily tradable onis an established securities market in the United States, so long as they are so listed,and we believe dividends paid by us on our common shares will be qualified dividend income (provided the other conditions listed above are met). There can, however, be no assuranceexpect that our common shares will be consideredshould qualify as readily tradable, on an established securities marketalthough there can be no assurances in the future. However, even if our common shares are not considered readily tradeable on an established securities market in the United States, as long as we are eligible for benefits of the Treaty, dividends paid by us will be qualified dividend income (provided the other conditions listed above are met).
this regard. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the preferential rates of taxation with respect to dividends in light of their own particular situations, including related restrictions and special rules. Corporate U.S. Holders are taxed on dividend income at the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate whether or not the dividend income is qualified dividend income.
The amount of any cash dividend paid in foreign currency will equal the U.S. dollar value of the dividend, calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the distribution is includible in the gross income of the U.S. Holder, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted to U.S. dollars at that time. A U.S. Holder should not recognize any foreign currency gain or loss in respect of such dividend distribution if such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars on the date the dividend distribution is includible in the U.S. Holder’s gross income. If the foreign currency is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date the dividend distribution is includible in the U.S. Holders gross income, however, gain or loss may be recognized upon a subsequent conversion of the foreign currency to U.S. dollars. Such foreign currency gain or loss, if any,
generally will be U.S.-source ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the preferential tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution.
Dividends received by U.S. Holders will constitutebe foreign-source income and will include any amount withheld by us in respect of Luxembourg income taxes. Subject to applicable limitations, some of which vary depending onupon the U.S. Holder'sHolder’s particular circumstances, generally be “passive” or “general” or "foreign branch"non-refundable Luxembourg income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax law concerning credits or deductions for foreign taxes and certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, a Luxembourg withholding tax imposed onwithheld from dividends described above under “Material Luxembourg Tax Considerations for Holders of Shares-Tax regime applicable to distributions-Withholding tax” should be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (or at a U.S. Holder’s election, may be deducted in computing taxable income if the U.S. Holder has elected to deduct all foreign income taxes for the taxable year). To the extent a refund of the tax withheld is available to a U.S. Holder under Luxembourg law or underrate not exceeding any applicable rate provided by the Treaty the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for creditcreditable against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. Special limitations onThe rules governing foreign tax credits apply to dividends subject to the preferential U.S. federal income tax rate of taxation for qualified dividend income. The rules with respect to foreign tax credits and deductions are complex and U.S. Holders are urged toshould consult their independent tax advisorsadvisers regarding the availabilitycreditability of theforeign taxes in their particular circumstances. In lieu of claiming a foreign tax credit, U.S. Holders may, at their election, deduct foreign taxes, including any Luxembourg income tax, in computing their taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations under their particular circumstances, includingU.S. law. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all foreign taxes paid or accrued in the effects of the Treaty.taxable year.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above,below, gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized (including the gross amount of the proceeds before the deduction of any foreign tax) on the sale or other taxable disposition and such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis, determined in U.S. dollars, in the common shares. Capital gains of individual, trust or estate U.S. Holders derived with respect to capital assets held for more than one year generally are eligible for the preferential rates of taxation applicable to long-term capital gains. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.
Capital gain or loss, if any, realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of a common share generally will be treated as U.S.-source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a disposition of a common share that is subject to Luxembourg or other foreign income tax imposed on the gain, the U.S. Holder may not be able to use such foreign taxes as a foreign tax credit against their U.S. federal income tax liability on such disposition (i.e., because the income or loss on the disposition would be U.S.-source) but may apply such foreign taxes as a foreign tax credit against U.S. federal income tax due on other income the U.S. Holder may have that is treated as derived from foreign sources in the appropriate foreign tax credit limitation category. Alternatively, the U.S. Holder may take a deduction for the foreign income tax if such holder does not take a credit for any foreign income tax during the taxable year.
If the consideration received for our common shares is paid in foreign currency, the amount realized will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received translated at the spot rate of exchange on the date of disposition. If our common shares are treated as traded on an established securities market and the relevant U.S. Holder is either a cash basis taxpayer or an accrual basis taxpayer who has made a special election (which must be applied consistently from year to year and cannot be changed without the consent of the IRS), such holder will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized in a foreign currency by translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale. If our common shares are not treated as traded on an established securities market, or the relevant U.S. Holder is an accrual basis taxpayer that is not eligible to or does not elect to determine the amount realized using the spot rate on the settlement date, such U.S. Holder will recognize foreign currency gain or loss to the extent of any difference between the U.S. dollar amount realized on the date of disposition (as determined above) and the U.S. dollar value of the currency received at the spot rate on the settlement date. A U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in our
Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) Rules
common shares will equal the cost of such common shares. If a U.S. Holder used foreign currency to purchase our common shares, the cost of our common shares will be the U.S. dollar value of the foreign currency purchase price on the date of purchase. If our common shares are treated as traded on an established securities market and the relevant U.S. Holder is either a cash basis taxpayer or an accrual basis taxpayer who has made the special election described above, such holder will determine the U.S. dollar value of the cost of such common shares by translating the amount paid at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the purchase.
Net Investment Income Tax
Certain U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts that do not fall into a special class of trusts that is exempt from such taxgenerally will be subject to a 3.8% “net investment income”special, generally adverse tax onregime that would differ in certain material respects from the lesser of (1)tax treatment described below if we are, or were to become, a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In general, we will be a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder if, for any taxable year in which the U.S. Holder’s “net investment income” (or “undistributed net investment income” in the caseHolder held our common shares, either (i) at least 75% of an estate or trust) for the relevant taxable year and (2) the excess of the U.S. Holder’s modified adjustedour gross income for the taxable year overis passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) of our assets during such taxable year is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, “passive income” generally includes, among other things and subject to certain threshold (whichexceptions, dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities, gains from securities transactions, net foreign currency gains and net gains from assets that produce passive income. If a foreign corporation owns at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation, the foreign corporation is treated for purposes of the PFIC tests as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation, and as receiving directly its proportionate share of the other corporation’s income. Although the determination of whether a corporation is a PFIC is made annually, and thus may be subject to change, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our most recently completed taxable year. However, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for any taxable year.
If we were to be treated as a PFIC, gain realized on the sale or other disposition of your common shares would in general not be treated as capital gain that is eligible for preferential tax rates in the case of individuals is between $125,000 and $250,000, dependingindividual, trust or estate U.S. Holders. Instead, if you are a U.S. Holder, unless you make a timely “mark-to-market” election electing to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to your common shares, or you make a timely “qualified electing fund” election electing to be taxed annually on the individual’s circumstances).earnings and gains of the PFIC attributable to your common shares (irrespective of distributions), you would be treated as if you had realized such gain ratably over your holding period in the common shares and would be
taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year except for the current year. In addition, unless you make a timely “mark-to-market” election or “qualified electing fund” election, distributions that you receive from us as a direct or indirect U.S. Holder will not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income if we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at the tax rates applicable to ordinary income, and to the extent they are treated as “excess distributions” under the PFIC rules, they will also be subject to the PFIC interest charge described above. A U.S. Holder’s net investment income generally includes its dividend income and its net gains fromHolder will be required to make an annual filing with the disposition ofIRS if such holder holds common shares unless such dividendin any year in which we are classified as a PFIC. With certain exceptions, your common shares will continue to be treated as stock in a PFIC if we were a PFIC at any time during your holding period in your common shares even if we no longer meet the PFIC tests in a later year.
The U.S. federal income or net gainstax rules relating to PFICs are derived in the ordinary course of the conduct of a trade or business (other than a trade or business that consists of certain passive or trading activities). Eachcomplex. Prospective U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate or trust isinvestors are urged to consult itstheir own tax advisors regardingadvisers with respect to the applicabilityapplication of the “net investment income” taxPFIC rules to its income and gains in respect of itstheir investment in theour common shares. The remainder of this discussion assumes that we are not a PFIC.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
In general, dividends on common shares, and payments of the proceeds of a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares, paid within the U.S. or through certain U.S. related financial intermediaries to a U.S. Holder are subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder is an exempt recipient or, in the case of backup withholding, provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and certifies under penalty of perjury that the holder is a U.S. person and is not subject to backup withholding.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules generally will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Certain U.S. Holders who hold interests in “specified foreign financial assets” (as defined in Section 6038D of the Code) are generally required to file an IRS Form 8938 as part of their U.S. federal income tax returns to report their ownership of such specified foreign financial assets, which may include our common shares, if the total value of those assets exceeds certain thresholds. Financial assets that are held through a U.S. financial institution are not subject to this reporting requirement. Investors who fail to report this required information could become subject to substantial penalties. In addition, in the event a U.S. Holder that is required to file IRS Form 8938 does not file such form, the statute of limitations on the assessment and collection of U.S. federal income taxes of such holder for the related tax year may not close until three years after the date that the required information is filed. U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding their tax reporting obligations.
F.DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS
Not applicable.
G.STATEMENT BY EXPERTS
Not applicable.
H.DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
We are required to file annual and special reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any documents filed by the Company at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. The SEC also maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov which contains reports and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.
I.SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to commodity price and interest rate risks, primarily related to our crop production activities and changes in exchange rates and interest rates. We manage our exposure to these risks through the use of various financial instruments, none of which are entered into for trading purposes. We have established policies and procedures governing the use of financial instruments, specifically as they relate to the type and volume of such financial instruments. Our use of financial derivative instruments is associated with our core business and is regulated by internal control policies. For further information on our market risks, please see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
A.DEBT SECURITIES
Not applicable.
B.WARRANTS AND RIGHTS
Not applicable.
C.OTHER SECURITIES
Not applicable.
D.AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
Not applicable.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation pursuant to Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019.2021. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based on this evaluation, our company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019.2021.
b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that: (i) pertains to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (ii) provides reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements for external reporting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of the Company’s management and directors; and (iii) provides reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedure may deteriorate. The Company, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021.
We assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment, the Company’s management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.2021.
c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192021 has been audited by Price Waterhouse & Co S.R.L, an independent registered public accounting firm, our independent auditor, as stated in their report which is included herein at pageon pages F-2 to F-4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
d) Changes in internal control over financial reporting
As required by Rule 13a-15(d), under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any change occurred during the period covered since the last report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, it has been determined that there has been no
change during the period
covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 16.
Item 16 A.Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our audit committee consists of three independent directors: Mr. Mark Schachter, Mr. Andrés Velasco Brañes and Mr. Ivo Sarjanovic. Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors has determined that Mr. Mark Schachter has the attributes of an “audit committee financial expert” and is independent within the meaning of this Item 16A and satisfies the financial literacy requirements of the NYSE.
Item 16 B.Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to our directors, executive officers and all employees. The text of our code of ethics is posted on our web site at: www.adecoagro.com.
Item 16 C.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees by categories specified below in connection with certain professional services rendered by Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L., a member firm of Price WaterhouseCoopers International Limited Network, an independent registered public accounting public firm, and our principal external auditors, for the periods indicated. Except as set forth below, we did not pay any other fees to our auditors during the periods indicated below.
| | | | For the year ended December 31, | | For the year ended
December 31, |
| | (in thousands of $) | | (in thousands of $) |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Audit Fees(1) | 1,288 |
| | 1,282 |
| Audit Fees(1) | 1,275 | | | 1,088 | |
| | Total | 1,288 |
| | 1,282 |
| Total | 1,275 | | | 1,088 | |
| |
(1) | “Audit fees” means the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal auditors for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of the Company, the statutory financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, and any other audit services required for the SEC or other regulatory filings. |
(1)“Audit fees” means the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal auditors for the audit of our Consolidated Financial Statements and internal control over financial reporting of the Company, the statutory financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, and any other audit services required for the SEC or other regulatory filings.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, no non-audit-related services were provided by our principal auditors.
Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures requiring that all audit and non-audit services performed by our independent auditors must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee annually reviews and pre-approves the services that may be provided by the independent auditors without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. Any service proposals submitted by external auditors that are not pre-approved services need to be discussed and approved by the Audit Committee during its meetings. Once the proposed service is approved, we or our subsidiaries formalize the engagement of services.
The Audit Committee or its Chairman, or any member of the Audit Committee to whom such authority is delegated, may approve in advance any permitted audit or permitted non-audit services and fees up to a predetermined amount. The Audit Committee is authorized to establish other policies and procedures for the pre-approval of such services and fees. The Audit Committee approved all of the non-audit services described above and determined that the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L.
Item 16 D.Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16 E.Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
| | | | (a) Total Number of Shares (Units) Purchased | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | (d) Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | | (a) Total Number of
Shares (Units)
Purchased | (b) Average Price
Paid per Share | (c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs | (d) Maximum
Number of Shares
that may yet be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs |
| 09/1/2013-12/31/2013 | 654,454 | 7.71 | 654,454 | 5,861,397 | 09/1/2013-12/31/2013 | 654,454 | 7.71 | 654,454 | 5,861,397 |
| 1/1/2014-8/31/2014 | 1,692,139 | 7.81 | 1,692,139 | 4,591,949 | 1/1/2014-8/31/2014 | 1,692,139 | 7.81 | 1,692,139 | 4,591,949 |
| 9/1/2015-10/31/2015 | 37,500 | 7.96 | 37,500 | 6,025,916 | 9/1/2015-10/31/2015 | 37,500 | 7.96 | 37,500 | 6,025,916 |
| 9/1/2016-12/31/2016 | 456,732 | 10.67 | 456,732 | 5,929,278 | 9/1/2016-12/31/2016 | 456,732 | 10.67 | 456,732 | 5,929,278 |
| 1/1/2017-12/31/2017 | 3,849,445 | 10.29 | 3,849,445 | 5,010,777 | 1/1/2017-12/31/2017 | 3,849,445 | 10.29 | 3,849,445 | 5,010,777 |
| 1/1/2018-4/26/2018 | 1,613,584 | 9.07 | 1,613,584 | 1,658,228 | 1/1/2018-4/26/2018 | 1,613,584 | 9.07 | 1,613,584 | 1,658,228 |
| 8/28/2019-8/30/2019 | 42,098 | 5.66 | 42,098 | 5,785,687 | |
| 9/3/2019-9/30/2019 | 255,634 | 5.86 | 255,634 | 5,530,053 | |
| 10/1/2019-10/30/2019 | 288,466 | 5.98 | 288,466 | 5,585,760 | |
| 11/26/2019-11/29/2019 | 30,000 | 6.86 | 30,000 | 5,555,760 | |
| 12/2/2019-12/11/2019 | 80,000 | 7.29 | 80,000 | 5,475,760 | |
| 2/2/2020-2/11/2020 | 54,800 | 7.21 | 54,800 | 5,420,960 | |
| 3/16/2020-3/19/2020 | 230,259 | 4.30 | 230,259 | 5,190,701 | |
| 1/1/2019-9/30/2019 | | 1/1/2019-9/30/2019 | 297,732 | 5.83 | 297,732 | 5,530,053 |
| 10/1/2019-12/31/2019 | | 10/1/2019-12/31/2019 | 398,466 | 6.31 | 398,466 | 5,475,760 |
| 1/1/2020-9/30/2020 | | 1/1/2020-9/30/2020 | 772,615 | 5.06 | 772,615 | 4,703,145 |
| 12/1/2020-12/31/2020 | | 12/1/2020-12/31/2020 | 66,716 | 6.60 | 66,716 | 5,800,224 |
| 1/1/2021-9/24/2021 | | 1/1/2021-9/24/2021 | 5,773,260 | 9.26 | 5,773,260 | 26,964 |
| 9/24/2021-12/31/2021 | | 9/24/2021-12/31/2021 | 1,635,742 | 7.87 | 1,635,742 | 3,998,776 |
| 1/1/2022-4/20/2022 | | 1/1/2022-4/20/2022 | 1,389,725 | 7.64 | 1,389,725 | 2,609,051 |
| Total | 9,285,111 | 7.44 | 9,285,111 | | Total | 18,638,110 | 7.85 | 18,638,110 | |
The total number of shares purchased set forth above were purchased pursuant to the Company´sCompany’s Repurchase Program adopted on September 12, 2013. See “Item 10 – Additional Information – Repurchase of Shares”.
Item 16 F.Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
Not applicable.
Item 16 G.Corporate Governance
Our corporate governance practices are governed by Luxembourg law (particularly the law of August 10th, 1915 on commercial companies) and our articles of association. As a Luxembourg company listed on the NYSE, we are not required to comply with all of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. We, however, believe that our corporate governance practices meet or exceed, in all material respects, the corporate governance standards that are generally required for controlled companies by the NYSE. The following is a summary of the significant ways that our corporate governance practices differ from the corporate governance standards required for listed U.S. companies by the NYSE (provided that our corporate governance practices may differ in non-material ways from the standards required by the NYSE that are not detailed here):
Majority of Independent Directors
Under NYSE standards, U.S. listed companies must have a majority of independent directors. There is no legal obligation under Luxembourg law to have a majority of independent directors on the boardBoard of directors.Directors.
Non-management Directors’ Meetings
Under NYSE standards, non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present and, if such group includes directors who are not independent, a meeting should be scheduled once per year including only independent directors. Neither Luxembourg law nor our Articles of Association require the holding of such meetings adand we do not have a set policy for these meetings. Our Articles of Association provide, however, that the board shall meet as often as required by the best interest of the Company. For additional information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management.”
Communication with Non-Management Directors
NYSE-listed companies are required to provide a method for interested parties to communicate directly with the non-management directors as a group. Shareholders may send communications to the Company’s non-management directors by
writing to Mr. Plínio Musetti at Rua Amauri, 255 - 17th Floor, Jardim Europa, São Paulo, SP 01448-000, Brazil, telephone: (5511) 3035-1588. Communications will be referred to the Presiding Director for appropriate action. The status of all outstanding concerns addressed to the Presiding Director will be reported to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors as appropriate.
Audit Committee
Under NYSE standards, listed U.S. companies are required to have an audit committee composed of independent directors that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act of 1934. Our Articles of Association provide that the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may set up an audit committee. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors has set up an Audit Committee and has appointed Mr. Mark Schachter , Mr. Ivo Andrés Sarjanovic and Mr. Andres Velasco Brañes as members of its audit committee. In accordance with NYSE standards, we have an audit committee entirely composed of independent directors. For additional information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices”.Practices.”
Under NYSE standards, all audit committee members of listed U.S. companies are required to be financially literate or must acquire such financial knowledge within a reasonable period and at least one of its members shall have experience in accounting or financial administration. In addition, if a member of the audit committee is simultaneously a member of the audit committee of more than three public companies, and the listed company does not limit the number of audit committees on which its members may serve, then in each case the board must determine whether the simultaneous service would prevent such member from effectively serving on the listed company’s audit committee and shall publicly disclose its decision. No comparable provisions on audit committee membership exist under Luxembourg law or our articles of association.
Standards for Evaluating Director Independence
Under NYSE standards, the board is required, on a case by case basis, to express an opinion with regard to the independence or lack of independence of each individual director. Neither Luxembourg law nor our Articles of Association require the board to express such an opinion. In addition, the definition of “independent” under the rules of the NYSE differs in some non-material respects from the definition contained in our Articles of Association.
Audit Committee Responsibilities
Pursuant to our Articles of Association, the audit committee shall assist the boardBoard of directorsDirectors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, including periodically reporting to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors on its activity and the adequacy of the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting. As per the audit committee charter, as amended, the audit committee shall make recommendations for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of, and consider the independence of, the company’s external auditors. The audit committee is required to review material transactions (as defined by the Articles of Association) between us or our subsidiaries with related parties, perform such other duties imposed to it by laws and regulations of the regulated market(s) on which the shares of the Company are listed, and also perform the other duties entrusted to it by the board.
The NYSE requires certain matters to be set forth in the audit committee charter of U.S. listed companies. Our audit committee charter provides for many of the responsibilities that are expected from such bodies under the NYSE standard; however, due to
our equity structure and holding company nature, the charter does not contain all such responsibilities, including provisions related to setting hiring policies for employees or former employees of independent auditors.
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.Committee
The NYSE requires that a listed U.S. company have a nominating/corporate governance committee of independent directors and a committee charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. As permitted under Luxembourg law and our Articles of Association, we do not currentlyWe have a nominating or corporate governance committee.Nominating Sub-Committee, which is part of the Talent Management & Compensation Committee, which consists of three independent directors: Mr. Plínio Musetti, Mr. Daniel González and Mr. Guillaume van der Linden.
Shareholder Voting on Equity Compensation Plans
Under NYSE standards, shareholders of U.S. listed companies must be given the opportunity to vote on equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto, except for employment inducement awards, certain grants, plans and amendments in the context of mergers and acquisitions, and certain specific types of plans. Neither Luxembourg corporate law nor our articles of incorporation require shareholder approval of equity based compensation plans. Luxembourg law only requires approval of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors for the adoption of equity based compensation plans.
Disclosure of Corporate Governance Guidelines
NYSE-listed companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. Neither Luxembourg law nor our Articles of Association require the adoption or disclosure of corporate governance guidelines. Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors follows corporate governance guidelines consistent with our equity structure and holding company nature, but we have not codified them and therefore do not disclose them on our website.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Under NYSE standards, listed companies must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. Neither Luxembourg law nor our Articles of Association require the adoption or disclosure of such a code of conduct.
We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to our directors, executive officers and all employees. The text of our code of ethics is posted on our web site at: www.adecoagro.com. And substantially complies with the NYSE´sNYSE’s requirements under the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Chief Executive Officer Certification
A chief executive officer of a U.S. company listed on NYSE must annually certify that he or she is not aware of any violation by the company of NYSE corporate governance standards. In accordance with NYSE rules applicable to foreign private issuers, our chief executive officer is not required to provide NYSE with this annual compliance certification. However, in accordance with NYSE rules applicable to all listed companies, our chief executive officer must promptly notify NYSE in writing after any of our executive officers becomes aware of any noncompliance with any applicable provision of NYSE’s corporate governance standards. In addition, we must submit an executed written affirmation annually and an interim written affirmation each time a change occurs to the board or the audit committee.
Item 16 H.Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 16 I.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
PART III
| |
Item 17. | Financial Statements |
Item 17. Financial Statements
We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this item.
| |
Item 18. | Financial Statements. |
Item 18. Financial Statements.
See pages F-1 through F-87F-88 of this annual report.
Item 19. Exhibits
|
| | | |
| Exhibit Number | | Description |
| 1.1 | | |
| | |
| 2.1 | | |
| | |
| 4.14 | | |
| | |
| 4.16 | | |
| | |
| 4.17 | | |
| | |
| 4.18 | | |
| | |
| 4.26 | | |
| | |
4.27 | | |
| | |
| 4.28 | | |
| | |
| 4.29 | | |
| | |
| 4.30 | | |
| | |
| 4.35 | | |
| | |
| 4.39 | | |
| | |
|
| 4.43 | | |
4.42 | | |
| | |
4.43 | | Indenture dated as of September 21, 2017 by and among Adecoagro S.A., as issuer, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilaga S.A., Adecoagro Brasil Participações S.A., Adecoagro Vale Do Ivinhema S.A., Usina Monte Alegre Ltda., as Subsidiary guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, Registrar, and Paying Agent. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.43 to the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| 8.1 | | |
| | |
| 12.1 | | |
| | |
| 12.2 | | |
| | |
| 13.1 | | |
| | |
| 13.2 | | |
| | |
| 15.1 | | |
| | |
| 15.2 | | |
| | |
| 101.INS | | Inline XBRL Instance Document. |
| | |
| 101.SCH | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
| | |
| 101.CAL | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| | |
| 101.DEF | | XBRLInline Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
| | |
| 101.LAB | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
| | |
| 101.PRE | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
| | |
| Adecoagro S.A. |
Adecoagro S.A. |
|
| /s/ Mariano Bosch |
| Name: Mariano Bosch |
| Title: Chief Executive Officer |
Date: April 28, 2020
2022
| | | | | |
| Table of contents Financial Statements |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Adecoagro S.A.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Adecoagro S.A. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192021 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Changes in Accounting Principles
As discussed in Note 35.1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for property, plant and equipment in 2018.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 15. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of Level 3 Biological Assets
As described in Notes 16, 3432 (b) and 35.1133.11 to the consolidated financial statements, the total fair value of the Company’s level 3 biological assets related to sown land - – crops, sown land - – rice and sown land - – sugarcane was US$ 115169 million atas of December 31, 2019.2021. Fair value of these biological assets is determined by management using a discounted cash flowsflow model which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including significant unobservable inputs. The discounted cash flow model included significant judgements and assumptions relating to management’s cash flow projections including future market prices, estimated yields at the point of harvest, estimated production cycle, future costs of harvesting and others cost and estimated discount rate.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of the Company’s level 3 biological assets related to sown land - – crops, sown land - – rice and sown land - – sugarcane is a critical audit matter are there was(i) the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value measurement. This in turn led tomeasurement; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgement, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures to evaluateand evaluating management’s cash flow projections and significant assumptions includingrelated to future market prices, estimated yields at the point of harvest, estimated production cycle, future costs of harvesting and others cost and estimated discount rate. In addition,rate; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuation of the Company’s level 3 biological assets related to sown land - – crops, sown land - – rice and sown land - – sugarcane. These procedures also included, among others evaluating the significant assumptions and methods used by management in developing the fair value measurement including future market prices, estimated yields at the point of harvest, estimated production cycle, future costs of harvesting and others cost and estimated discount rate. Evaluating management’s assumptions involved evaluating whether these assumptions were reasonable considering the consistency with external information and past records and testing management’s sensitivity analysis of certain significant assumptions. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of certain significant assumptions, including estimated yields at the point of harvest and estimated production cycle.
Property, Plant and Equipment and Goodwill Impairment Assessment- Cash Generating Units with Allocated Goodwill in Brazil
As described in Notes 12, 15, 3432 (a) and 35.1033.10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated property, plant and equipment and goodwill balances atas of December 31, 20192021 were US$ 1,493 1,422.6
million and US$ 2016.6 million, respectively, of which US$ 652 million wasand the property, plant and equipment and goodwill allocated to the cash generating units with allocated goodwill in Brazil.Brazil was US$ 468 million. The Company conducts an impairment test as of September 30 of each year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset or cash generating unit may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or cash generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amounts are estimated for individual assets or, where an individual asset does not generate cash flows independently, the recoverable amount is estimated for the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. The recoverable amount of the asset or the cash generating unit is the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use. The recoverable amount of cash generating units with allocated goodwill in Brazil was determined based on value in use calculations. The determination of the value in use calculation required the use of significant estimates and assumptions related to management’s cash flow projections, including yield average growth rates, future pricing increases, future cost decrease, discount rates and perpetuity growth rate.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the impairment assessment of property, plant and equipment and goodwill associated with the cash generating units with allocated goodwill in Brazil is a critical audit matter are there was(i) the significant judgment by management when developing the value in use calculation of these cash generating units. This in turn led tounits; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures to evaluateand evaluating management’s cash flow projections and significant assumptions includingrelated to yield average growth rates, future pricing increases, future cost decrease, discount rates and perpetuity growth rate. In addition,rate; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s impairment assessment of property, plant and equipment and goodwill associated with the cash generating units with allocated goodwill in Brazil, including controls over the valuation of the Company’s cash generating units. These procedures also included, among others (i) testing management’s process for developing the estimate; (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model; (iii) testing the completeness accuracy, and relevanceaccuracy of underlying data used in the model; and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management includingrelated to yield average growth rates, future pricing increases, future cost decrease, discount rates and perpetuity growth rate. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to yield average growth rates, future pricing increases, future cost decrease, discount rates and perpetuity growth rate involved evaluating whether the
assumptions used by management were reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the cash generating units,units; (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data,data; and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the Company’s discounted cash flow model and certain significant assumptions, including the discount rate.rate assumptions.
Buenos Aires, Argentina.
April 28, 2020.
/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE & CO. S.R.L.
/s/ Jorge FedericoFrederico Zabaleta (Partner)
Jorge Frederico Zabaleta
Buenos Aires, Argentina.
April 28, 2022.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.
Legal information
Denomination: Adecoagro S.A.
Legal address: Vertigo Naos Building, 6, Rue Eugène Ruppert, L-2453, Luxembourg
Company activity: Agricultural and agro-industrial
Date of registration: June 11, 2010
Expiration of company charter: No term defined
Number of register (RCS Luxembourg): B153.681
Issued Capital Stock: 122,381,815 common shares
Outstanding Capital stock: 117,086,050 111,096,772 common shares
Treasury shares: 5,295,765 11,285,043 common shares
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Income
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Note | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 4 | 1,124,352 | | | 817,764 | | | 887,138 | |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | 5 | (854,965) | | | (611,946) | | | (671,173) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 16 | 227,740 | | | 122,729 | | | 68,589 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | | (12,879) | | | 7,005 | | | 1,825 | |
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | | 484,248 | | | 335,552 | | | 286,379 | |
| General and administrative expenses | 6 | (69,794) | | | (53,428) | | | (57,202) | |
| Selling expenses | 6 | (117,662) | | | (95,058) | | | (106,972) | |
| Other operating (expense)/ income, net | 8 | (18,768) | | | 1,987 | | | (822) | |
| Profit from operations | | 278,024 | | | 189,053 | | | 121,383 | |
| Finance income | 9 | 36,670 | | | 26,054 | | | 9,908 | |
| Finance costs | 9 | (151,681) | | | (213,776) | | | (202,566) | |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 9 | 11,541 | | | 12,064 | | | 92,437 | |
| Financial results, net | 9 | (103,470) | | | (175,658) | | | (100,221) | |
| Profit before income tax | | 174,554 | | | 13,395 | | | 21,162 | |
| Income tax (expense) | 10 | (43,837) | | | (12,325) | | | (20,820) | |
| Profit for the year | | 130,717 | | | 1,070 | | | 342 | |
| | | | | | |
| Attributable to: | | | | | | |
| Equity holders of the parent | | 130,669 | | | 412 | | | (772) | |
| Non-controlling interest | | 48 | | | 658 | | | 1,114 | |
| | | | | | |
| Earnings / (Loss) per share from operations attributable to the equity holders of the parent during the year: | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | 11 | 1.135 | | | 0.003 | | | (0.007) | |
| Diluted earnings per share | 11 | 1.130 | | | 0.003 | | | (0.007) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Note | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 4 | 887,138 |
| | 793,239 |
|
| 933,178 |
|
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | 5 | (671,173 | ) | | (609,965 | ) |
| (766,727 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 16 | 68,589 |
| | 16,195 |
|
| 63,220 |
|
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | | 1,825 |
| | (909 | ) |
| 8,852 |
|
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | | 286,379 |
| | 198,560 |
| | 238,523 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | 6 | (57,202 | ) | | (56,080 | ) |
| (57,299 | ) |
| Selling expenses | 6 | (106,972 | ) | | (90,215 | ) |
| (95,399 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | 8 | (822 | ) | | 104,232 |
|
| 43,763 |
|
| Profit from operations | | 121,383 |
| | 156,497 |
| | 129,588 |
|
| Finance income | 9 | 9,908 |
| | 8,581 |
|
| 11,744 |
|
| Finance costs | 9 | (202,566 | ) | | (271,263 | ) |
| (131,349 | ) |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 9 | 92,437 |
| | 81,928 |
| | — |
|
| Financial results, net | 9 | (100,221 | ) | | (180,754 | ) | | (119,605 | ) |
| Profit / (Loss) before income tax | | 21,162 |
| | (24,257 | ) | | 9,983 |
|
| Income tax (expense) / benefit | 10 | (20,820 | ) | | 1,024 |
|
| 4,992 |
|
| Profit / (Loss) for the year | | 342 |
| | (23,233 | ) | | 14,975 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Attributable to: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Equity holders of the parent | | (772 | ) | | (24,622 | ) |
| 13,198 |
|
| Non-controlling interest | | 1,114 |
| | 1,389 |
|
| 1,777 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (Loss) / Earnings per share from operations attributable to the equity holders of the parent during the year: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic earnings per share | 11 | (0.007 | ) | | (0.211 | ) |
| 0.109 |
|
| Diluted earnings per share | 11 | (0.007 | ) | | (0.211 | ) |
| 0.108 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 6
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| | | | | | | | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | |
| Profit / (Loss) for the year | 342 |
| | (23,233 | ) | | 14,975 |
| |
| Profit for the year | | Profit for the year | 130,717 | | | 1,070 | | | 342 | |
| Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | Other comprehensive income: | |
| - Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | | | | | | - Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | |
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | (27,828 | ) | | (121,296 | ) | | (21,233 | ) | Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | 121,146 | | | (78,961) | | | (27,828) | |
| Cash flow hedge, net of income tax (Note 2) | (19,420 | ) | | (32,195 | ) | | 12,608 |
| |
| Cash flow hedge, net of income tax | | Cash flow hedge, net of income tax | 29,758 | | | (14,386) | | | (19,420) | |
| - Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss: | | | | | | - Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss: | |
| Revaluation surplus net of income tax (Note 12, 14) | (31,929 | ) | | 405,906 |
| | — |
| Revaluation surplus net of income tax (Note 12, 14) | (136,622) | | | 29,453 | | | (31,929) | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) / income for the year | (79,177 | ) | | 252,415 |
| | (8,625 | ) | |
| Total comprehensive (loss) / income for the year | (78,835 | ) | | 229,182 |
| | 6,350 |
| |
| Other comprehensive income/ (loss) for the year | | Other comprehensive income/ (loss) for the year | 14,282 | | | (63,894) | | | (79,177) | |
| Total comprehensive income / (loss) for the year | | Total comprehensive income / (loss) for the year | 144,999 | | | (62,824) | | | (78,835) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Attributable to: | |
| | |
| | |
| Attributable to: | | |
| Equity holders of the parent | (75,437 | ) | | 213,641 |
| | 6,322 |
| Equity holders of the parent | 147,273 | | | (63,353) | | | (75,437) | |
| Non-controlling interest | (3,398 | ) | | 15,541 |
| | 28 |
| Non-controlling interest | (2,274) | | | 529 | | | (3,398) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 7
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Note | 2021 | | 2020 |
| ASSETS | | | | |
| Non-Current Assets | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 12 | 1,422,623 | | | 1,358,292 | |
| Right of use assets | 13 | 260,776 | | | 209,694 | |
| Investment property | 14 | 32,132 | | | 31,179 | |
| Intangible assets | 15 | 31,337 | | | 26,930 | |
| Biological assets | 16 | 19,355 | | | 14,725 | |
| Deferred income tax assets | 10 | 10,321 | | | 19,821 | |
| Trade and other receivables, net | 18 | 42,231 | | | 52,266 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 17 | 757 | | | 1,951 | |
| Other assets | | 1,071 | | | 809 | |
| Total Non-Current Assets | | 1,820,603 | | | 1,715,667 | |
| Current Assets | | | | |
| Biological assets | 16 | 175,823 | | | 150,968 | |
| Inventories | 19 | 239,524 | | | 133,461 | |
| Trade and other receivables, net | 18 | 145,849 | | | 145,662 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 17 | 828 | | | 151 | |
| Other assets | | 8 | | | 45 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 20 | 199,766 | | | 336,282 | |
| Total Current Assets | | 761,798 | | | 766,569 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | | 2,582,401 | | | 2,482,236 | |
| SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | | | | |
| Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the parent | | | | |
| Share capital | 22 | 183,573 | | | 183,573 | |
| Share premium | 22 | 851,060 | | | 902,815 | |
| Cumulative translation adjustment | | (514,609) | | | (555,044) | |
| Equity-settled compensation | | 16,073 | | | 14,795 | |
| Cash flow hedge | 2 | (60,932) | | | (90,689) | |
| Other reserves | | 106,172 | | | 83,406 | |
| Treasury shares | | (16,909) | | | (7,630) | |
| Revaluation surplus | | 289,982 | | | 343,570 | |
| Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | | 41,574 | | | 41,574 | |
| Retained earnings | | 115,735 | | | 8,671 | |
| Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent | | 1,011,719 | | | 925,041 | |
| Non-controlling interest | | 36,111 | | | 38,683 | |
| TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | | 1,047,830 | | | 963,724 | |
| LIABILITIES | | | | |
| Non-Current Liabilities | | | | |
| Trade and other payables | 25 | 284 | | | 290 | |
| Borrowings | 26 | 705,487 | | | 813,464 | |
| Lease liabilities | 27 | 201,718 | | | 159,435 | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 10 | 265,848 | | | 182,377 | |
| Payroll and social liabilities | 28 | 1,243 | | | 1,075 | |
| | | | |
| Provisions for other liabilities | 29 | 2,565 | | | 2,705 | |
| Total Non-Current Liabilities | | 1,177,145 | | | 1,159,346 | |
| Current Liabilities | | | | |
| Trade and other payables | 25 | 168,746 | | | 126,315 | |
| Current income tax liabilities | | 1,625 | | | 760 | |
| Payroll and social liabilities | 28 | 25,051 | | | 23,333 | |
| Borrowings | 26 | 112,164 | | | 157,626 | |
| Lease liabilities | 27 | 45,136 | | | 36,337 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 17 | 1,283 | | | 13,141 | |
| Provisions for other liabilities | 29 | 3,421 | | | 1,654 | |
| Total Current Liabilities | | 357,426 | | | 359,166 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 1,534,571 | | | 1,518,512 | |
| TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | | 2,582,401 | | | 2,482,236 | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Note | 2019 | | 2018 |
| ASSETS | | |
| | |
|
| Non-Current Assets | | |
| | |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 12 | 1,493,220 |
| | 1,480,439 |
|
| Right of use assets | 13 | 238,053 |
| | — |
|
| Investment property | 14 | 34,295 |
| | 40,725 |
|
| Intangible assets | 15 | 33,679 |
| | 27,909 |
|
| Biological assets | 16 | 13,303 |
| | 11,270 |
|
| Deferred income tax assets | 10 | 13,664 |
| | 16,191 |
|
| Trade and other receivables, net | 19 | 44,993 |
| | 38,820 |
|
| Other assets | | 1,034 |
| | 1,184 |
|
| Total Non-Current Assets | | 1,872,241 |
| | 1,616,538 |
|
| Current Assets | | |
| | |
|
| Biological assets | 16 | 117,133 |
| | 94,117 |
|
| Inventories | 20 | 112,790 |
| | 128,102 |
|
| Trade and other receivables, net | 19 | 127,338 |
| | 158,686 |
|
| Derivative financial instruments | 18 | 1,435 |
| | 6,286 |
|
| Other assets | | 94 |
| | 8 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 21 | 290,276 |
| | 273,635 |
|
| Total Current Assets | | 649,066 |
| | 660,834 |
|
| TOTAL ASSETS | | 2,521,307 |
| | 2,277,372 |
|
| SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | | |
| | |
|
| Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the parent | | |
| | |
|
| Share capital | 23 | 183,573 |
| | 183,573 |
|
| Share premium | 23 | 901,739 |
| | 900,503 |
|
| Cumulative translation adjustment | | (680,315 | ) | | (666,037 | ) |
| Equity-settled compensation | | 15,354 |
| | 16,191 |
|
| Cash flow hedge | 2 | (76,303 | ) | | (56,884 | ) |
| Other reserves | | 66,047 |
| | 32,380 |
|
| Treasury shares | | (7,946 | ) | | (8,741 | ) |
| Revaluation surplus | | 337,877 |
| | 383,889 |
|
| Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | | 41,574 |
| | 41,574 |
|
| Retained earnings | | 206,669 |
| | 237,188 |
|
| Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent | | 988,269 |
| | 1,063,636 |
|
| Non-controlling interest | | 40,614 |
| | 44,509 |
|
| TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | | 1,028,883 |
| | 1,108,145 |
|
| LIABILITIES | | |
| | |
|
| Non-Current Liabilities | | |
| | |
|
| Trade and other payables | 26 | 3,599 |
| | 211 |
|
| Borrowings | 27 | 780,202 |
| | 718,484 |
|
| Lease liabilities | 28 | 174,570 |
| | — |
|
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 10 | 165,508 |
| | 168,171 |
|
| Payroll and social liabilities | 29 | 1,209 |
| | 1,219 |
|
| Provisions for other liabilities | 30 | 2,936 |
| | 3,296 |
|
| Total Non-Current Liabilities | | 1,128,024 |
| | 891,381 |
|
| Current Liabilities | | |
| | |
|
| Trade and other payables | 26 | 106,887 |
| | 106,226 |
|
| Current income tax liabilities | | 754 |
| | 1,398 |
|
| Payroll and social liabilities | 29 | 25,208 |
| | 25,978 |
|
| Borrowings | 27 | 188,078 |
| | 143,632 |
|
| Lease liabilities | 28 | 41,814 |
| | — |
|
| Derivative financial instruments | 18 | 1,423 |
| | 283 |
|
| Provisions for other liabilities | 30 | 236 |
| | 329 |
|
| Total Current Liabilities | | 364,400 |
| | 277,846 |
|
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 1,492,424 |
| | 1,169,227 |
|
| TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | | 2,521,307 |
| | 2,277,372 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 8
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Attributable to equity holders of the parent | |
| | Attributable to equity holders of the parent | | | Share capital
(Note 22) | Share
premium
(Note 22) | Cumulative
translation
adjustment | Equity-settled
compensation | Cash flow hedge | Other Reserves | Treasury
shares | Revaluation surplus | Reserve from the sale of non-controlling
interests in subsidiaries | Retained
earnings | Subtotal | Non-
controlling
interest | Total
shareholders’
equity |
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | | Balance at January 1, 2019 | 183,573 | | 900,503 | | (478,096) | | 16,191 | | (56,884) | | 32,380 | | (8,741) | | 383,889 | | 41,574 | | 49,247 | | 1,063,636 | | 44,509 | | 1,108,145 | |
| | Share capital (Note 23) | Share premium (Note 23) | Cumulative translation adjustment | Equity-settled compensation | Cash flow hedge | Treasury shares | Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | Retained earnings | Subtotal | Non- controlling interest | Total shareholders’ equity | |
| Balance at January 1, 2017 | 183,573 |
| 937,250 |
| (533,120 | ) | 17,218 |
| (37,299 | ) | (1,859 | ) | 41,574 |
| 92,997 |
| 700,334 |
| 11,970 |
| 712,304 |
| |
| | Profit for the year | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 13,198 |
| 13,198 |
| 1,777 |
| 14,975 |
| Profit for the year | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (772) | | (772) | | 1,114 | | 342 | |
| Other comprehensive income: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Other comprehensive income: | |
| - Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
–Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | | –Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | |
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | — |
| — |
| (19,484 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (19,484 | ) | (1,749 | ) | (21,233 | ) | Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | — | | — | | (14,278) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (12,183) | | — | | — | | (26,461) | | (1,367) | | (27,828) | |
| Cash flow hedge (*) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 12,608 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 12,608 |
| — |
| 12,608 |
| Cash flow hedge (*) | — | | — | | — | | — | | (19,419) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (19,419) | | (1) | | (19,420) | |
–Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | | –Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | |
| Revaluation surplus (**) | | Revaluation surplus (**) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (28,785) | | — | | — | | (28,785) | | (3,144) | | (31,929) | |
| Reserve of the revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets (***) | | Reserve of the revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets (***) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (5,044) | | — | | 5,044 | | — | | — | | — | |
| Other comprehensive income for the year | — |
| — |
| (19,484 | ) | — |
| 12,608 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (6,876 | ) | (1,749 | ) | (8,625 | ) | Other comprehensive income for the year | — | | — | | (14,278) | | — | | (19,419) | | — | | — | | (46,012) | | — | | 5,044 | | (74,665) | | (4,512) | | (79,177) | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | — |
| — |
| (19,484 | ) | — |
| 12,608 |
| — |
| — |
| 13,198 |
| 6,322 |
| 28 |
| 6,350 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | — | | — | | (14,278) | | — | | (19,419) | | — | | — | | (46,012) | | — | | 4,272 | | (75,437) | | (3,398) | | (78,835) | |
| | | | |
| Employee share options (Note 24) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| Reserves for the benefit of government grants (1) | | Reserves for the benefit of government grants (1) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 34,791 | | — | | — | | — | | (34,791) | | — | | — | | — | |
| Employee share options (Note 23) | | Employee share options (Note 23) | |
| - Exercised | — |
| 50 |
| — |
| (21 | ) | — |
| 10 |
| — |
| — |
| 39 |
| — |
| 39 |
| - Exercised | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| - Forfeited | — |
| — |
| — |
| (14 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| 14 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| - Forfeited | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Restricted shares (Note 24): | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| Restricted shares (Note 23): | | Restricted shares (Note 23): | |
| - Value of employee services | — |
| — |
| — |
| 5,552 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 5,552 |
| — |
| 5,552 |
| - Value of employee services | — | | — | | — | | 3,612 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,612 | | — | | 3,612 | |
| - Vested | — |
| 4,149 |
| — |
| (4,883 | ) | — |
| 734 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| - Vested | — | | 4,455 | | — | | (4,449) | | — | | — | | 715 | | — | | — | | — | | 721 | | — | | 721 | |
| Purchase of own shares (Note 23) | — |
| (32,515 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (5,852 | ) | — |
| — |
| (38,367 | ) | — |
| (38,367 | ) | |
| - Forfeited | | - Forfeited | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 5 | | (5) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| - Granted (***) | | - Granted (***) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (1,129) | | 1,129 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Purchase of own shares (Note 22) | | Purchase of own shares (Note 22) | — | | (3,219) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (1,044) | | — | | — | | — | | (4,263) | | — | | (4,263) | |
| Dividends | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (2,859 | ) | (2,859 | ) | Dividends | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (497) | | (497) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | 183,573 |
| 908,934 |
| (552,604 | ) | 17,852 |
| (24,691 | ) | (6,967 | ) | 41,574 |
| 106,209 |
| 673,880 |
| 9,139 |
| 683,019 |
| |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | | Balance at December 31, 2019 | 183,573 | | 901,739 | | (492,374) | | 15,354 | | (76,303) | | 66,047 | | (7,946) | | 337,877 | | 41,574 | | 18,728 | | 988,269 | | 40,614 | | 1,028,883 | |
(*) Net of (8,715)6,752 of income tax.
(**) Net of 10,480 of Income tax.
(***) Net of 2,978 of Income tax
(1) Correspond to the presumed credit of ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de Serviços) over the sale values in our Sugar, ethanol and energy business. (please see Note 24).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 9
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Attributable to equity holders of the parent | | |
| | Share capital (Note 23) | Share premium (Note 23) | Cumulative translation adjustment | Equity-settled compensation | Cash flow hedge | Other Reserves | Treasury shares | Revaluation surplus | Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | Retained earnings | Subtotal | Non- controlling interest | Total shareholders’ equity |
| Balance at January 1, 2018 | 183,573 |
| 908,934 |
| (552,604 | ) | 17,852 |
| (24,691 | ) | — |
| (6,967 | ) | — |
| 41,574 |
| 106,209 |
| 673,880 |
| 9,139 |
| 683,019 |
|
| Adjustment of opening balance for the application of IAS 29 | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 187,941 |
| 187,941 |
| 20,237 |
| 208,178 |
|
| Total equity at the beginning of financial year | 183,573 |
| 908,934 |
| (552,604 | ) | 17,852 |
| (24,691 | ) | — |
| (6,967 | ) | — |
| 41,574 |
| 294,150 |
| 861,821 |
| 29,376 |
| 891,197 |
|
| Loss for the year | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (24,622 | ) | (24,622 | ) | 1,389 |
| (23,233 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| - Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | — |
| — |
| (113,433 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (113,433 | ) | (7,863 | ) | (121,296 | ) |
| Cash flow hedge (*) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (32,193 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (32,193 | ) | (2 | ) | (32,195 | ) |
| - Items will not be reclassified to profit or loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revaluation surplus (**) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 383,889 |
| — |
| — |
| 383,889 |
| 22,017 |
| 405,906 |
|
| Other comprehensive income for the year | — |
| — |
| (113,433 | ) | — |
| (32,193 | ) | — |
| — |
| 383,889 |
| — |
| — |
| 238,263 |
| 14,152 |
| 252,415 |
|
| Total comprehensive income for the year | — |
| — |
| (113,433 | ) | — |
| (32,193 | ) | — |
| — |
| 383,889 |
| — |
| (24,622 | ) | 213,641 |
| 15,541 |
| 229,182 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserves for the benefit of government grants (1) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 32,380 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (32,380 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Employee share options (Note 24): | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| - Forfeited | — |
| — |
| — |
| (40 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 40 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Restricted shares (Note 24): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| - Value of employee services | — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,899 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,899 |
| — |
| 3,899 |
|
| - Vested | — |
| 4,775 |
| — |
| (5,520 | ) | — |
| — |
| 745 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Purchase of own shares (Note 23) | — |
| (13,206 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (2,519 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (15,725 | ) | — |
| (15,725 | ) |
| Dividends | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (408 | ) | (408 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | 183,573 |
| 900,503 |
| (666,037 | ) | 16,191 |
| (56,884 | ) | 32,380 |
| (8,741 | ) | 383,889 |
| 41,574 |
| 237,188 |
| 1,063,636 |
| 44,509 |
| 1,108,145 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Attributable to equity holders of the parent | | |
| | Share capital
(Note 22) | Share
premium
(Note 22) | Cumulative
translation
adjustment | Equity-settled
compensation | Cash flow
hedge | Other Reserves | Treasury
shares | Revaluation surplus | Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | Retained
earnings | Subtotal | Non-
controlling
interest | Total
shareholders’
equity |
| Balance at January 1, 2020 | 183,573 | | 901,739 | | (492,374) | | 15,354 | | (76,303) | | 66,047 | | (7,946) | | 337,877 | | 41,574 | | 18,728 | | 988,269 | | 40,614 | | 1,028,883 | |
| Profit for the year | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 412 | | 412 | | 658 | | 1,070 | |
| Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
–Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | — | | — | | (62,670) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (15,173) | | — | | — | | (77,843) | | (1,118) | | (78,961) | |
| Cash flow hedge (*) | — | | — | | — | | — | | (14,386) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (14,386) | | — | | (14,386) | |
–Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revaluation surplus (**) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 28,464 | | — | | — | | 28,464 | | 989 | | 29,453 | |
| Reserve of the revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets (***) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (7,598) | | — | | 7,598 | | — | | — | | — | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) / income for the year | — | | — | | (62,670) | | — | | (14,386) | | — | | — | | 5,693 | | — | | 7,598 | | (63,765) | | (129) | | (63,894) | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | — | | — | | (62,670) | | — | | (14,386) | | — | | — | | 5,693 | | — | | 8,010 | | (63,353) | | 529 | | (62,824) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserves for the benefit of government grants (1) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 18,067 | | — | | — | | — | | (18,067) | | — | | — | | — | |
| Employee share options (Note 23): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| - Forfeited | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Restricted shares and restricted units (Note 23): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| - Value of employee services | — | | — | | — | | 3,266 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,266 | | — | | 3,266 | |
| - Vested | — | | 4,182 | | — | | (3,825) | | — | | 383 | | 484 | | — | | — | | — | | 1,224 | | — | | 1,224 | |
| - Forfeited | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 36 | | (36) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| - Granted | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (1,127) | | 1,127 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Purchase of own shares (Note 22) | — | | (3,106) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (1,259) | | — | | — | | — | | (4,365) | | — | | (4,365) | |
| Dividends | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (2,460) | | (2,460) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | 183,573 | | 902,815 | | (555,044) | | 14,795 | | (90,689) | | 83,406 | | (7,630) | | 343,570 | | 41,574 | | 8,671 | | 925,041 | | 38,683 | | 963,724 | |
(*) Net of 11,3225,729 of Income tax.
(**) Net of 139,22311,790 of Income tax.
(***) Net of 3,458 of Income tax.
(1) Correspond to the presumed credit of ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de Serviços) over the sale values in our Sugar, ethanol and energy business. (please see Note 25)24).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 10
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Attributable to equity holders of the parent | |
| | Attributable to equity holders of the parent | | | Share capital
(Note 22) | Share
premium
(Note 22) | Cumulative
translation
adjustment | Equity-settled
compensation | Cash flow
hedge | Other reserves | Treasury
shares | Revaluation surplus | Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | Retained
earnings | Subtotal | Non-
controlling
interest | Total
shareholders’
equity |
| | Share capital (Note 23) | Share premium (Note 23) | Cumulative translation adjustment | Equity-settled compensation | Cash flow hedge | Other reserves | Treasury shares | Revaluation surplus | Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | Retained earnings | Subtotal | Non- controlling interest | Total shareholders’ equity | |
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 183,573 |
| 900,503 |
| (666,037 | ) | 16,191 |
| (56,884 | ) | 32,380 |
| (8,741 | ) | 383,889 |
| 41,574 |
| 237,188 |
| 1,063,636 |
| 44,509 |
| 1,108,145 |
| |
| Balance at January 1, 2021 | | Balance at January 1, 2021 | 183,573 | | 902,815 | | (555,044) | | 14,795 | | (90,689) | | 83,406 | | (7,630) | | 343,570 | | 41,574 | | 8,671 | | 925,041 | | 38,683 | | 963,724 | |
| Profit for the year | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (772 | ) | (772 | ) | 1,114 |
| 342 |
| Profit for the year | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 130,669 | | 130,669 | | 48 | | 130,717 | |
| Other comprehensive income: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | |
| - Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| - Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | | | | | | |
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | — |
| — |
| (14,278 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (12,183 | ) | — |
| — |
| (26,461 | ) | (1,367 | ) | (27,828 | ) | Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | — | | — | | 40,435 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 71,731 | | — | | — | | 112,166 | | 8,980 | | 121,146 | |
| Cash flow hedge (*) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (19,419 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (19,419 | ) | (1 | ) | (19,420 | ) | Cash flow hedge (*) | — | | — | | — | | — | | 29,757 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 29,757 | | 1 | | 29,758 | |
| - Items will not be reclassified to profit or loss: | | - Items will not be reclassified to profit or loss: | |
| Revaluation surplus (**) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (28,785 | ) | — |
| — |
| (28,785 | ) | (3,144 | ) | (31,929 | ) | Revaluation surplus (**) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (125,319) | | — | | — | | (125,319) | | (11,303) | | (136,622) | |
| Reserve of the revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets (***) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (5,044 | ) | — |
| 5,044 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| Other comprehensive income for the year | — |
| — |
| (14,278 | ) | — |
| (19,419 | ) | — |
| — |
| (46,012 | ) | — |
| 5,044 |
| (74,665 | ) | (4,512 | ) | (79,177 | ) | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | — |
| — |
| (14,278 | ) | — |
| (19,419 | ) | — |
| — |
| (46,012 | ) | — |
| 4,272 |
| (75,437 | ) | (3,398 | ) | (78,835 | ) | |
| | Other comprehensive income/ (loss) for the year | | Other comprehensive income/ (loss) for the year | — | | — | | 40,435 | | — | | 29,757 | | — | | — | | (53,588) | | — | | — | | 16,604 | | (2,322) | | 14,282 | |
| Total comprehensive income/ (loss) for the year | | Total comprehensive income/ (loss) for the year | — | | — | | 40,435 | | — | | 29,757 | | — | | — | | (53,588) | | — | | 130,669 | | 147,273 | | (2,274) | | 144,999 | |
| | | | |
| Reserves for the benefit of government grants (1) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 34,791 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (34,791 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| Reserves for the benefit of government grants (1) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 23,605 | | — | | — | | — | | (23,605) | | — | | — | | — | |
| Restricted shares (Note 24): | |
|
| |
|
| |
| | Restricted shares (Note 23): | | Restricted shares (Note 23): | |
| - Value of employee services | — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,612 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,612 |
| — |
| 3,612 |
| - Value of employee services | — | | — | | — | | 5,420 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 5,420 | | — | | 5,420 | |
| - Vested | — |
| 4,455 |
| — |
| (4,449 | ) | — |
| — |
| 715 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 721 |
| — |
| 721 |
| - Vested | — | | 3,594 | | — | | (4,142) | | — | | 734 | | 262 | | — | | — | | — | | 448 | | — | | 448 | |
| - Forfeited | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 5 |
| (5 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| - Forfeited | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 27 | | (27) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| - Granted | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (1,129 | ) | 1,129 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| - Granted | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (1,600) | | 1,600 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Purchase of own shares (Note 23) | — |
| (3,219 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (1,044 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (4,263 | ) | — |
| (4,263 | ) | |
| Purchase of own shares (Note 22) | | Purchase of own shares (Note 22) | — | | (55,349) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (11,114) | | — | | — | | — | | (66,463) | | — | | (66,463) | |
| Dividends | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (497 | ) | (497 | ) | Dividends | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (298) | | (298) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 183,573 |
| 901,739 |
| (680,315 | ) | 15,354 |
| (76,303 | ) | 66,047 |
| (7,946 | ) | 337,877 |
| 41,574 |
| 206,669 |
| 988,269 |
| 40,614 |
| 1,028,883 |
| |
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | | Balance at December 31, 2021 | 183,573 | | 851,060 | | (514,609) | | 16,073 | | (60,932) | | 106,172 | | (16,909) | | 289,982 | | 41,574 | | 115,735 | | 1,011,719 | | 36,111 | | 1,047,830 | |
(*) Net of (6,752)2,526 of Income tax.
(**) Net of 10,480 of Income tax.
(***) Net of 2,9789,953 of Income tax.
(1) Correspond to the presumed credit of ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de Serviços) over the sale values in our Sugar, ethanol and energy business. (please see Note 25)24).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 11
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| | | | Note | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Note | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Profit / (Loss) for the year | | 342 |
| | (23,233 | ) | | 14,975 |
| |
| Profit for the year | | Profit for the year | | 130,717 | | | 1,070 | | | 342 | |
| Adjustments for: | |
|
| |
|
| | | Adjustments for: | | |
| Income tax expense / (benefit) | 10 | 20,820 |
| | (1,024 | ) | | (4,992 | ) | |
| Income tax expense | | Income tax expense | 10 | 43,837 | | | 12,325 | | | 20,820 | |
| Depreciation | 12 | 173,208 |
| | 153,034 |
| | 150,071 |
| Depreciation | 12 | 167,297 | | | 140,579 | | | 173,208 | |
| Amortization | 15 | 1,231 |
| | 1,220 |
| | 936 |
| Amortization | 15 | 1,631 | | | 1,293 | | | 1,231 | |
| Depreciation of right of use assets | 13 | 45,168 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Depreciation of right of use assets | 13 | 49,199 | | | 40,820 | | | 45,168 | |
| Loss from the disposal of other property items | 8 | 329 |
| | 95 |
| | 986 |
| |
| Loss/ (gain) from the disposal of other property items | | Loss/ (gain) from the disposal of other property items | 8 | 397 | | | (2,198) | | | 329 | |
| Gain from the sale of farmland and other assets | 8 | (1,354 | ) | | (36,227 | ) | | — |
| Gain from the sale of farmland and other assets | 8 | — | | | (2,064) | | | (1,354) | |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 22 | (149 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| |
| Net (loss) / gain from the Fair value adjustment of Investment properties | 8 | 325 |
| | (13,409 | ) | | (4,302 | ) | |
| Loss / (Gain) from the sale of subsidiary | | Loss / (Gain) from the sale of subsidiary | | (10) | | | 554 | | | — | |
| Gain on acquisition of subsidiaries | | Gain on acquisition of subsidiaries | | — | | | — | | | (149) | |
| Net loss/(gain)from the fair value adjustment of Investment properties | | Net loss/(gain)from the fair value adjustment of Investment properties | 8 | 4,331 | | | (1,077) | | | 325 | |
| Equity settled share-based compensation granted | 7 | 4,734 |
| | 4,728 |
| | 5,552 |
| Equity settled share-based compensation granted | 7 | 6,406 | | | 4,316 | | | 4,734 | |
| Gain from derivative financial instruments and forwards | 8, 9 | (469 | ) | | (51,504 | ) | | (38,679 | ) | |
| Loss / (gain) from derivative financial instruments and forwards | | Loss / (gain) from derivative financial instruments and forwards | 8, 9 | 17,276 | | | 10,058 | | | (469) | |
| Interest, finance cost related to lease liabilities and other financial expense, net | 9 | 62,653 |
| | 44,347 |
| | 53,446 |
| Interest, finance cost related to lease liabilities and other financial expense, net | 9 | 75,610 | | | 47,686 | | | 62,653 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of non harvested biological assets (unrealized) | | (1,720 | ) | | 30,299 |
| | (14,645 | ) | Initial recognition and changes in fair value of non harvested biological assets (unrealized) | | (11,310) | | | (32,975) | | | (1,720) | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) | | 481 |
| | 647 |
| | (2,371 | ) | Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) | | 4,001 | | | 481 | | | 481 | |
| Provision and allowances | | 2,778 |
| | 2,126 |
| | 825 |
| Provision and allowances | | 1,146 | | | 1,940 | | | 2,778 | |
| Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 9 | (92,437 | ) | | (81,928 | ) | | — |
| Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 9 | (11,541) | | | (12,064) | | | (92,437) | |
| Foreign exchange losses, net | 9 | 108,458 |
| | 183,195 |
| | 38,708 |
| |
| Foreign exchange (gains)/ losses, net | | Foreign exchange (gains)/ losses, net | 9 | (18,939) | | | 109,266 | | | 108,458 | |
| Cash flow hedge – transfer from equity | 9 | 15,594 |
| | 26,693 |
| | 20,758 |
| Cash flow hedge – transfer from equity | 9 | 52,650 | | | 24,363 | | | 15,594 | |
| Subtotal | | 339,992 |
| | 239,059 |
| | 221,268 |
| Subtotal | | 512,698 | | | 344,373 | | | 339,992 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Increase in trade and other receivables | | (17,664 | ) | | (65,942 | ) | | (9,476 | ) | Increase in trade and other receivables | | (40,449) | | | (55,233) | | | (17,664) | |
| (Increase) / Decrease in inventories | | 9,998 |
| | (41,531 | ) | | (4,089 | ) | (Increase) / Decrease in inventories | | (102,815) | | | (30,165) | | | 9,998 | |
| (Increase) / Decrease in biological assets | | (27,037 | ) | | 2,958 |
| | (18,013 | ) | |
| (Increase) / Decrease in other assets | | (210 | ) | | (777 | ) | | 2 |
| |
| Decrease in derivative financial instruments | | 3,997 |
| | 50,021 |
| | 40,910 |
| |
| Increase in trade and other payables | | 13,102 |
| | 31,148 |
| | 6,555 |
| |
| Decrease / (Increase) in biological assets | | Decrease / (Increase) in biological assets | | 7,597 | | | (10,290) | | | (27,037) | |
| Increase in other assets | | Increase in other assets | | (303) | | | (35) | | | (210) | |
| (Increase) / Decrease in derivative financial instruments | | (Increase) / Decrease in derivative financial instruments | | (29,319) | | | 5,234 | | | 3,997 | |
| (Decrease) / Increase in trade and other payables | | (Decrease) / Increase in trade and other payables | | (1,499) | | | 828 | | | 13,102 | |
| Increase in payroll and social security liabilities | | 2,565 |
| | 5,876 |
| | 1,953 |
| Increase in payroll and social security liabilities | | 4,874 | | | 4,120 | | | 2,565 | |
| (Decrease) / Increase in provisions for other liabilities | | (351 | ) | | (430 | ) | | 855 |
| |
| Increase / (Decrease) in provisions for other liabilities | | Increase / (Decrease) in provisions for other liabilities | | 74 | | | 380 | | | (351) | |
| Net cash generated from operating activities before taxes paid | | 324,392 |
| | 220,382 |
| | 239,965 |
| Net cash generated from operating activities before taxes paid | | 350,858 | | | 259,212 | | | 324,392 | |
| Income tax paid | | (2,282 | ) | | (1,869 | ) | | (2,860 | ) | Income tax paid | | (2,196) | | | (2,087) | | | (2,282) | |
| Net cash generated from operating activities | (a) | 322,110 |
| | 218,513 |
|
| 237,105 |
| Net cash generated from operating activities | (a) | 348,662 | | | 257,125 | | | 322,110 | |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 12
Adecoagro S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| | | | Note | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Note | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | |
| Acquisition of business, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired | | 683 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Acquisition of business, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired | | — | | | — | | | 683 | |
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment | 12 | (252,450 | ) | | (207,069 | ) | | (198,550 | ) | Purchases of property, plant and equipment | 12 | (199,295) | | | (168,529) | | | (252,450) | |
| Purchase of cattle and non current biological assets | 16 | (4,950 | ) | | (5,706 | ) | | (1,694 | ) | Purchase of cattle and non current biological assets | 16 | (11,776) | | | (7,339) | | | (4,950) | |
| Purchases of intangible assets | 15 | (8,617 | ) | | (3,321 | ) | | (2,141 | ) | Purchases of intangible assets | 15 | (1,934) | | | (1,122) | | | (8,617) | |
| Interest received and others | 9 | 8,139 |
| | 7,915 |
| | 11,230 |
| Interest received and others | 9 | 16,729 | | | 25,421 | | | 7,210 | |
| Proceeds from disposal of other property items | | 2,652 |
| | 1,748 |
| | 2,820 |
| Proceeds from disposal of other property items | | 2,946 | | | 3,482 | | | 2,652 | |
| Proceeds from the sale of farmland and other assets | 22 | 5,833 |
| | 31,511 |
| | — |
| Proceeds from the sale of farmland and other assets | 21 | 8,099 | | | 16,022 | | | 5,833 | |
| Proceeds from the sale of subsidiary | | Proceeds from the sale of subsidiary | 21 | 10,010 | | | 10,149 | | | — | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (b) | (248,710 | ) | | (174,922 | ) |
| (188,335 | ) | Net cash used in investing activities | (b) | (175,221) | | | (121,916) | | | (249,639) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | |
| Issuance of senior notes | 27 | — |
| | — |
| | 495,678 |
| |
| | Proceeds from long-term borrowings | 27 | 108,271 |
| | 45,536 |
| | 232,433 |
| Proceeds from long-term borrowings | 26 | 30,972 | | | 116,015 | | | 108,271 | |
| Payments of long-term borrowings | 27 | (101,826 | ) | | (124,349 | ) | | (602,700 | ) | Payments of long-term borrowings | 26 | (108,425) | | | (34,750) | | | (101,826) | |
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | 27 | 193,977 |
| | 318,108 |
| | 106,730 |
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | 26 | 286,115 | | | 207,217 | | | 193,977 | |
| Payments of short-term borrowings | 27 | (127,855 | ) | | (190,630 | ) | | (64,787 | ) | Payments of short-term borrowings | 26 | (328,463) | | | (233,540) | | | (131,521) | |
| Interest paid | | (57,662 | ) | | (50,021 | ) |
| (41,612 | ) | Interest paid | (c) | (53,587) | | | (60,026) | | | (53,996) | |
| Prepayment related expenses | | — |
| | — |
| | (6,080 | ) | |
| Proceeds from equity settled shared-based compensation exercised | | — |
| | — |
| | 39 |
| |
| Collection of derivatives financial instruments | | 1,481 |
| | (2,578 | ) | | (9,476 | ) | |
| Borrowings prepayment related expenses | | Borrowings prepayment related expenses | | (3,068) | | | — | | | — | |
| | Collections / (Payments) of derivatives financial instruments | | Collections / (Payments) of derivatives financial instruments | | 2,370 | | | (1,687) | | | 1,481 | |
| Lease payments | | (49,081 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| Lease payments | | (62,273) | | | (40,336) | | | (49,081) | |
| Purchase of own shares | | (4,263 | ) | | (15,725 | ) | | (38,367 | ) | Purchase of own shares | | (66,463) | | | (4,365) | | | (4,263) | |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interest | | (905 | ) | | (1,195 | ) | | (1,664 | ) | Dividends paid to non-controlling interest | | (311) | | | (2,447) | | | (905) | |
| Net cash (used) / generated from financing activities | (c) | (37,863 | ) | | (20,854 | ) |
| 70,194 |
| |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 35,537 |
| | 22,737 |
|
| 118,964 |
| |
| Net cash used from financing activities | | Net cash used from financing activities | (d) | (303,133) | | | (53,919) | | | (37,863) | |
| Net (decrease)/ increase in cash and cash equivalents | | Net (decrease)/ increase in cash and cash equivalents | | (129,692) | | | 81,290 | | | 34,608 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 21 | 273,635 |
| | 269,195 |
| | 158,568 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 20 | 336,282 | | | 290,276 | | | 273,635 | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes and inflation on cash and cash equivalents | (d) | (18,896 | ) | | (18,297 | ) | | (8,337 | ) | Effect of exchange rate changes and inflation on cash and cash equivalents | (e) | (6,824) | | | (35,284) | | | (17,967) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 21 | 290,276 |
| | 273,635 |
| | 269,195 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 20 | 199,766 | | | 336,282 | | | 290,276 | |
(a) Includes 23,550(30,666), (14,956) and 7,59823,550 of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 2021, 2020 and 2019 and 2018,, respectively.
(b) Includes 3,851(4,694), (429) and 4,1223,851 of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 2021, 2020 and 2019 and 2018,, respectively.
(c) Includes (14,340)(1,109), (1,638) and (8,231)(14,340) of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 2021, 2020 and 2019 and 2018,, respectively.
(d) Includes (13,061)41,237, 15,694 and (3,489)(13,061) of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 2021, 2020 and 2019 and 2018,, respectively.
(e) Includes (5,877), (309) and nil of the combined effect of IAS 29 and IAS 21 of the Argentine subsidiaries for 2021, 2020 and 2019 , respectively.
Non-cash investing and financing transactions disclosed in other notes are the seller financing of Subsidiaries in Note 22.21.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 13
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
Adecoagro S.A. (the "Company" or "Adecoagro") is the Group’s ultimate parent company and is a société anonyme (stock corporation) organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Adecoagro is a holding company primarily engaged through its operating subsidiaries in agricultural and agro-industrial activities. The Company and its operating subsidiaries are collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Group"."Group." These activities are carried out through three3 major lines of business, namely, Farming; Sugar, Ethanol and Energy and Land Transformation. Farming is further comprised of three3 reportable segments, which are described in detail in Note 3 to these consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.
Adecoagro is a Public Company listed in the New York Stock Exchange as a foreign registered company under the symbol of AGRO.
These consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on March 10, 2020.April 28, 2022.
| |
2. | Financial risk management |
2. Financial risk management
Risk management principles and processes
The Group’s activities are exposed to a variety of financial risks. The Group’s overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize the Group’s capital costs by using suitable means of financing and to manage and control the Group’s financial risks effectively. The Group uses financial instruments to hedge certain risk exposures.
The Group’s approach to the identification, assessment and mitigation of risk is carried out by a Risk and Commercial Committee, which focuses on timely and appropriate management of risk.
The principal financial risks are related to raw material price, end-product price, exchange rate, interest rate, liquidity and credit. This section provides a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s strategy, performance, results of operations and financial condition. These risks do not appear in any particular order of potential materiality or probability of occurrence.
In Argentina, recentongoing economical events forced the government to impose certain restrictions in the exchange markets, such as:
| |
– | Set specific deadlines to enter and settle exports |
| |
– | Prior authorization of the BCRA for the formation of external assets for companies |
| |
– | Prior authorization of the BCRA for the payment of debts related to companies abroad |
| |
– | Deferral of payment of certain public debt instruments. |
–Dividends payments to non residents.
– Set specific deadlines to enter and settle exports
– Prior authorization of the BCRA for the formation of external assets for companies
– Prior authorization of the BCRA for the payment of debts related to companies abroad
– Deferral of payment of certain public debt instruments.
– Fuel price control
•Exchange rate risk
The Group’s cash flows, statement of income and statement of financial position are presented in U.S. Dollars and may be affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. Currency risks as defined by IFRS 7 arise on account of monetary assets and liabilities being denominated in a currency that is not the functional currency.
A significant majority of the Group’s business activities is conducted in the respective functional currencies of the subsidiaries (primarily the Brazilian Reais and the Argentine Peso). However, the Group may transact in currencies other than the respective functional currencies, mainly the U.S. Dollars. As such, these subsidiaries may hold U.S. Dollar denominated monetary balances at each year-end as indicated in the tables below.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
2. Financial risk management (continued)
The Group’s net financial position exposure to the U.S. Dollar is managed on a case-by-case basis, partly by hedging certain expected cash flows with foreign exchange derivative contracts.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
2. | Financial risk management (continued) |
The following tables show the net monetary position of the respective subsidiaries within the Group categorized by functional currency. Non-U.S. Dollar amounts are presented in U.S. Dollars for purpose of these tables.
| | | | 2019 (*) | | 2021 |
| | Subsidiaries’ functional currency | | Subsidiaries’ functional currency |
Net monetary position (Liability)/ Asset | Argentine Peso | Brazilian Reais | Uruguayan Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total | Net monetary position
(Liability)/ Asset | Argentine
Peso | Brazilian
Reais | Uruguayan
Peso | | U.S. Dollar | Total |
| Argentine Peso | (19,733 | ) | — |
| — |
| (560 | ) | (20,293 | ) | Argentine Peso | (33,002) | | — | | — | | | — | | (33,002) | |
| Brazilian Reais | — |
| (196,081 | ) | — |
| — |
| (196,081 | ) | Brazilian Reais | — | | (396,288) | | — | | | — | | (396,288) | |
| U.S. Dollar | (317,296 | ) | (438,604 | ) | 21,586 |
| 48,091 |
| (686,223 | ) | U.S. Dollar | (267,448) | | (270,213) | | 21,773 | | | 30,490 | | (485,398) | |
| Uruguayan Peso | — |
| — |
| (2,086 | ) | — |
| (2,086 | ) | Uruguayan Peso | — | | — | | (1,837) | | | — | | (1,837) | |
| | Total | (337,029 | ) | (634,685 | ) | 19,500 |
| 47,531 |
| (904,683 | ) | Total | (300,450) | | (666,501) | | 19,936 | | | 30,490 | | (916,525) | |
(*) It includes lease liabilities for the adoption of IFRS 16 (See Note 35.1)
| | | | 2018 | | 2020 |
| | Subsidiaries’ functional currency | | Subsidiaries’ functional currency |
Net monetary position (Liability)/ Asset | Argentine Peso | Brazilian Reais | Uruguayan Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total | Net monetary position
(Liability)/ Asset | Argentine
Peso | Brazilian
Reais | Uruguayan
Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total |
| Argentine Peso | (21,757 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (21,757 | ) | Argentine Peso | (115,097) | | — | | — | | (288) | | (115,385) | |
| Brazilian Reais | — |
| 35,884 |
| — |
| — |
| 35,884 |
| Brazilian Reais | — | | (298,039) | | — | | — | | (298,039) | |
| U.S. Dollar | (260,372 | ) | (480,501 | ) | 24,512 |
| 115,681 |
| (600,680 | ) | U.S. Dollar | (193,353) | | (307,611) | | 20,720 | | 47,122 | | (433,122) | |
| Uruguayan Peso | — |
| — |
| (909 | ) | — |
| (909 | ) | Uruguayan Peso | — | | — | | (655) | | — | | (655) | |
| Total | (282,129 | ) | (444,617 | ) | 23,603 |
| 115,681 |
| (587,462 | ) | Total | (308,450) | | (605,650) | | 20,065 | | 46,834 | | (847,201) | |
The Group’s analysis shown on the tables below is carried out based on the exposure of each functional currency subsidiary against the U.S. Dollar. The Group estimated that, other factors being constant, a hypothetical 10% appreciation/depreciation(depreciation) of the U.S. Dollar against the respective functional currencies for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 would have decreased/(decreased)/increased the Group’s Profit before income tax for the year. A 10% depreciation of the U.S. Dollar against the functional currencies would have an equal and opposite effect on the income statement. A portion of this effect would have been recognized as other comprehensive income since a portion of the Company’s borrowings was used as cash flow hedge of the foreign exchange rate risk of a portion of its highly probable future sales in U.S. Dollars (see Hedge Accounting - Cash Flow Hedge below for details).
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Functional currency |
| Net monetary position | Argentine Peso | Brazilian Reais | Uruguayan Peso | Total |
| 2019 | U.S. Dollar | (31,730 | ) | (43,860 | ) | 2,159 |
| (73,431 | ) |
| 2018 | U.S. Dollar | (26,037 | ) | (48,050 | ) | 2,451 |
| (71,636 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Functional currency |
| Net monetary position | Argentine
Peso | Brazilian
Reais | Uruguayan
Peso | | Total |
| 2021 | U.S. Dollar | (26,745) | | (27,021) | | 2,177 | | | (51,589) | |
| 2020 | U.S. Dollar | (19,335) | | (30,761) | | 2,072 | | | (48,024) | |
The tables above only consider the effect of a hypothetical appreciation / depreciation of the U.S. Dollars on the Group’s net financial position. A hypothetical appreciation / depreciation of the U.S. Dollar against the functional currencies of the Group’s subsidiaries has historically had a positive / negative effect, respectively, on the fair value of the Group’s biological assets and the end prices of the Group’s agriculture produce, both of which are generally linked to the U.S. Dollar.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
2. Financial risk management (continued)
Hedge Accounting Cash Flow Hedge
Effective July 1, 2013, the Group formally documented and designated cash flow hedging relationships to hedge the foreign exchange rate risk of a portion of its highly probable future sales in U.S. Dollars using a portion of its borrowings denominated in U.S. Dollars, currency forwards and foreign currency floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
2. | Financial risk management (continued) |
Principal amounts of long-term borrowings (non-derivative financial instruments) and notional values of foreign currency forward contracts (derivative financial instruments) were designated as hedging instruments. These instruments are exposed to Brazilian Reais/ U.S. Dollar foreign currency risks related to operations in Brazil and Argentine Peso/U.S. Dollar in Argentina, respectively. As of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, approximately 30.2%10% and 19.5%15%, respectively, of projected sales qualify as highly probable forecast transactions for hedge accounting purposes and were designated as hedged items.
The Group has prepared formal documentation in order to support the designation above, including an explanation of how the designation of the hedging relationship is aligned with the Group’s Risk Management Policy, identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged transactions, the nature of the risk being hedged and an analysis which demonstrates that the hedge is expected to be highly effective. The Group reassesses the prospective and retrospective effectiveness of the hedge on an ongoing basis comparing the foreign currency component of the carrying amount of the hedging instruments and of the highly probable future sales.
Under cash flow hedge accounting, effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on derivative and non-derivative hedging instruments not be immediately recognized in profit or loss, but be reclassified from equity to profit or loss in the periods when the future sales occur, thus allowing for a more appropriate presentation of the results for the period reflecting the strategy in the Group’s Risk Management Policy.
The Company expects that the cash flows will occur and affect profit or loss between 20202022 and 2024.2026.
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, a total amount before income tax of US$ 54,31210,565 gain (US$ 75,82246,145 gain in 2018)2020) was recognized in other comprehensive income and an amount of US$ 15,59442,848 loss (US$ 26,69326,031 loss in 2018)2020) was reclassified from equity to profit or loss within “Financial results, net”.
•Raw material price risk
Inflation in the costs of raw materials and goods and services from industry suppliers and manufacturers presents risks to project economics. A significant portion of the Group’s cost structure includes the cost of raw materials primarily seeds, fertilizers and agrochemicals, among others. Prices for these raw materials may vary significantly.
•End-product price risk
Prices for commodity products have historically been cyclical, reflecting overall economic conditions and changes in capacity within the industry, which affect the profitability of entities engaged in the agribusiness industry. The Group combines different actions to minimize price risk. A percentage of crops are to be sold during and post harvest period. The Group manages minimum and maximum prices for each commodity as well as gross margin per each crop as to decide when and how to sell. End-product price risks are hedged if economically viable and possible by entering into forward contracts with major trading houses or by using derivative financial instruments, consisting mainly of crops and sugar future contracts, but also includes occasionally put and call options. A movement in end-product futures prices would result in a change in the fair value of the end product hedging contracts. These fair value changes, after taxes, are recorded in the consolidated statement of income.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
2. Financial risk management (continued)
Contract positions are designed to ensure that the Group would receive a defined minimum price for certain quantities of its production. The counterparties to these instruments generally are major financial institutions. In entering into these contracts, the Group has assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The Group does not expect any material losses as a result of counterparty defaults. The Group is also obliged to pay margin deposits and premiums for these instruments. These estimates represent only the sensitivity of the financial instruments to market risk and not the Group exposure to end product price risks as a whole, since the crops and cattle products sales are not financial instruments within the scope of IFRS 7 disclosure requirements.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
2. | Financial risk management (continued) |
Liquidity risk
The Group is exposed to liquidity risks, including risks associated with refinancing borrowings as they mature, and that borrowing facilities are not available to meet cash requirements. Failure to manage liquidity risks could have a material impact on the Group’s cash flow and statement of financial position.
Prudent liquidity risk management includes managing the profile of debt maturities and funding sources close oversight of cash flows projections, maintaining sufficient cash, and ensuring the availability of funding from an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. The Group's ability to fund its existing and prospective debt requirements is managed by maintaining diversified funding sources with adequate available funding lines from high quality lenders; and reaching to have long-term financial facilities. During 2017 the Company issued a 10 years Note, which improved the maturity of the borrowings (see Note 26).
As of December 31, 2019,2021, cash and cash equivalents of the Group totaled U$S 290.3US$199.8 million, which could be used for managing liquidity risk.
The tables below analyzes the Group’s non-derivative financial liabilities and derivative financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the statement of financial position to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows and as a result they do not reconcile to the amounts disclosed on the statement of financial position except for short-term payables where discounting is not applied.
| | | At December 31, 2019 | Less than 1 year | Between 1 and 2 years | Between 2 and 5 years | Over 5 Years | Total | |
| At December 31, 2021 | | At December 31, 2021 | Less than
1 year | Between
1 and 2 years | Between 2
and 5 years | Over
5 Years | Total |
| Trade and other payables | 94,821 |
| 3,399 |
| 30 |
| 170 |
| 98,420 |
| Trade and other payables | 153,175 | | 15 | | 22 | | 247 | | 153,459 | |
| Borrowings | 122,403 |
| 154,682 |
| 230,058 |
| 681,819 |
| 1,188,962 |
| Borrowings | 153,311 | | 57,849 | | 245,538 | | 577,178 | | 1,033,876 | |
| Leases Liabilities | 46,370 |
| 52,372 |
| 89,259 |
| 121,081 |
| 309,082 |
| Leases Liabilities | 53,384 | | 53,172 | | 122,625 | | 123,180 | | 352,361 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,423 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,423 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,283 | | — | | — | | — | | 1,283 | |
| Total | 265,017 |
| 210,453 |
| 319,347 |
| 803,070 |
| 1,597,887 |
| Total | 361,153 | | 111,036 | | 368,185 | | 700,605 | | 1,540,979 | |
| | | At December 31, 2018 | Less than 1 year | Between 1 and 2 years | Between 2 and 5 years | Over 5 Years | Total | |
| At December 31, 2020 | | At December 31, 2020 | Less than
1 year | Between
1 and 2 years | Between 2
and 5 years | Over
5 Years | Total |
| Trade and other payables | 95,956 |
| 6 |
| 18 |
| 187 |
| 96,167 |
| Trade and other payables | 114,523 | | 15 | | 22 | | 253 | | 114,813 | |
| Borrowings | 190,671 |
| 74,478 |
| 286,557 |
| 636,836 |
| 1,188,542 |
| Borrowings | 286,588 | | 132,266 | | 197,941 | | 713,321 | | 1,330,116 | |
| Leases Liabilities | | Leases Liabilities | 36,714 | | 20,608 | | 74,565 | | 65,639 | | 197,526 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 258 |
| 25 |
| — |
| — |
| 283 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 13,141 | | — | | — | | — | | 13,141 | |
| Total | 286,885 |
| 74,509 |
| 286,575 |
| 637,023 |
| 1,284,992 |
| Total | 450,966 | | 152,889 | | 272,528 | | 779,213 | | 1,655,596 | |
•Interest rate risk
The Group’s interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings at floating rates, which expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk. The interest rate profile of the Group's borrowings is set out in Note 27.26.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
2. Financial risk management (continued)
The Group occasionally manages its cash flow interest rate risk exposure by using floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps. Such interest rate swaps have the economic effect of converting borrowings from floating rates to fixed rates.
The following tables show a breakdown of the Group’s fixed-rate and floating-rate borrowings per currency denomination and functional currency of the subsidiary issuing the loans (excluding finance leases).debt holder. These analyses are performed after giving effect to interest rate swaps.
The analysis for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 |
| | Subsidiaries’ functional currency |
| Rate per currency denomination | Argentine
Peso | Brazilian
Reais | Uruguayan
Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total |
| Fixed rate: | | | | | |
| Argentine Peso | 11,769 | | — | | — | | — | | 11,769 | |
| Brazilian Reais | — | | 10,887 | | — | | — | | 10,887 | |
| U.S. Dollar | 96,456 | | 342,522 | | — | | 165,173 | | 604,151 | |
| Subtotal fixed-rate borrowings | 108,225 | | 353,409 | | — | | 165,173 | | 626,807 | |
| Variable rate: | | | | | |
| Brazilian Reais | — | | 169,597 | | — | | — | | 169,597 | |
| U.S. Dollar | 19,793 | | 1,454 | | — | | — | | 21,247 | |
| Subtotal variable-rate borrowings | 19,793 | | 171,051 | | — | | — | | 190,844 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Total borrowings as per statement of financial position | 128,018 | | 524,460 | | — | | 165,173 | | 817,651 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 |
| | Subsidiaries’ functional currency |
| Rate per currency denomination | Argentine
Peso | Brazilian
Reais | Uruguayan
Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total |
| Fixed rate: | | | | | |
| Argentine Peso | 81,283 | | — | | — | | — | | 81,283 | |
| Brazilian Reais | — | | 22,834 | | — | | — | | 22,834 | |
| U.S. Dollar | 30,671 | | 423,286 | | 2,002 | | 157,565 | | 613,524 | |
| Subtotal fixed-rate borrowings | 111,954 | | 446,120 | | 2,002 | | 157,565 | | 717,641 | |
| Variable rate: | | | | | |
| Brazilian Reais | — | | 184,123 | | — | | — | | 184,123 | |
| U.S. Dollar | 66,584 | | 2,742 | | — | | — | | 69,326 | |
| Subtotal variable-rate borrowings | 66,584 | | 186,865 | | — | | — | | 253,449 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Total borrowings as per statement of financial position | 178,538 | | 632,985 | | 2,002 | | 157,565 | | 971,090 | |
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, if interest rates on floating-rate borrowings had been 1% higher with all other variables held constant, the Group’s Profit before income tax for the years would have decreased as shown below. A 1% decrease in interest rates would have an equal and opposite effect on the income statement.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
2. | 2. Financial risk management (continued) |
The analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:
| | | | 2019 | | 2021 |
| | Subsidiaries’ functional currency | | Subsidiaries’ functional currency |
| Rate per currency denomination | Argentine Peso | Brazilian Reais | Uruguayan Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total | Rate per currency denomination | Argentine
Peso | Brazilian
Reais | Uruguayan
Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total |
| Fixed rate: | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| Argentine Peso | 549 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 549 |
| |
| Brazilian Reais | — |
| 142,142 |
| — |
| — |
| 142,142 |
| |
| U.S. Dollar | 128,464 |
| 77,378 |
| 15,113 |
| 504,814 |
| 725,769 |
| |
| Subtotal fixed-rate borrowings | 129,013 |
| 219,520 |
| 15,113 |
| 504,814 |
| 868,460 |
| |
| Variable rate: | |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Variable rate: | | | |
| Brazilian Reais | — |
| 13,604 |
| — |
| — |
| 13,604 |
| Brazilian Reais | — | | (2) | | — | | — | | (2) | |
| U.S. Dollar | 79,339 |
| 6,877 |
| — |
| — |
| 86,216 |
| U.S. Dollar | — | | — | | 0 | — | | — | |
| Subtotal variable-rate borrowings | 79,339 |
| 20,481 |
| — |
| — |
| 99,820 |
| |
| Total borrowings as per statement of financial position | 208,352 |
| 240,001 |
| 15,113 |
| 504,814 |
| 968,280 |
| |
| Total effects on profit before income tax | | Total effects on profit before income tax | — | | (2) | | — | | — | | (2) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 |
| | Subsidiaries’ functional currency |
| Rate per currency denomination | Argentine Peso | Brazilian Reais | Uruguayan Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total |
| Fixed rate: | |
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Argentine Peso | 2,320 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,320 |
|
| Brazilian Reais | — |
| 62,939 |
| — |
| — |
| 62,939 |
|
| U.S. Dollar | 49,218 |
| 87,722 |
| 16,510 |
| 504,368 |
| 657,818 |
|
| Subtotal fixed-rate borrowings | 51,538 |
| 150,661 |
| 16,510 |
| 504,368 |
| 723,077 |
|
| Variable rate: | |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Brazilian Reais | — |
| 19,329 |
| — |
| — |
| 19,329 |
|
| U.S. Dollar | 111,453 |
| 7,662 |
| — |
| — |
| 119,115 |
|
| Subtotal variable-rate borrowings | 111,453 |
| 26,991 |
| — |
| — |
| 138,444 |
|
| Total borrowings as per analysis | 162,991 |
| 177,652 |
| 16,510 |
| 504,368 |
| 861,521 |
|
| Finance leases | 595 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 595 |
|
| Total borrowings as per statement of financial position | 163,586 |
| 177,652 |
| 16,510 |
| 504,368 |
| 862,116 |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, if interest rates on floating-rate borrowings had been 1% higher with all other variables held constant, the Group’s Profit before income tax for the years would have decreased as shown below. A 1% decrease in interest rates would have an equal and opposite effect on the income statement.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 |
| | Subsidiaries’ functional currency |
| Rate per currency denomination | Argentine Peso | Brazilian Reais | Uruguayan Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total |
| Variable rate: | |
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Brazilian Reais | — |
| (136 | ) | — |
| — |
| (136 | ) |
| U.S. Dollar | (793 | ) | (69 | ) | — |
| — |
| (862 | ) |
| Total effects on profit before income tax | (793 | ) | (205 | ) | — |
| — |
| (998 | ) |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
2. | Financial risk management (continued) |
| | | | 2018 | | 2020 |
| | Subsidiaries’ functional currency | | Subsidiaries’ functional currency |
| Rate per currency denomination | Argentine Peso | Brazilian Reias | Uruguayan Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total | Rate per currency denomination | Argentine
Peso | Brazilian
Reias | Uruguayan
Peso | U.S. Dollar | Total |
| Variable rate: | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Variable rate: | | | |
| Brazilian Reais | — |
| (193 | ) | — |
| — |
| (193 | ) | Brazilian Reais | — | | (1,841) | | — | | — | | (1,841) | |
| U.S. Dollar | (1,115 | ) | (77 | ) | — |
| — |
| (1,192 | ) | U.S. Dollar | (666) | | (27) | | — | | — | | (693) | |
| Total effects on profit before income tax | (1,115 | ) | (270 | ) | — |
| — |
| (1,385 | ) | Total effects on profit before income tax | (666) | | (1,868) | | — | | — | | (2,534) | |
The sensitivity analysis has been determined assuming that the change in interest rates had occurred at the date of the statement of financial position and had been applied to the exposure to interest rate risk for financial instruments in existence at that date. The 100 basis point increase or decrease represents management's assessment of a reasonable possible change in those interest rates, which have the most impact on the Group, specifically the United States and Brazilian rates over the period until the next annual statement of financial position date.
•Credit risk
The Group’s exposures to credit risk arise in certain agreements in relation to amounts owed for physical product sales, the use of derivative instruments, and the investment of surplus cash balances. The Group is also exposed to political and economic risk events, which may cause non-payment of foreign currency obligations to the Group.
The Group’s policy is to manage credit exposure to trading counterparties within defined trading limits. All of the Group’s significant counterparties are assigned internal credit limits.
The Group sells to a large base of customers. Type and class of customers may differ depending on the Group’s business segments. For the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, more than 96%73% and 87%80%, respectively, of the Group’s sales of crops were sold to 4227 and 4936 well-known customers (both multinational and local) with good credit history with the Group. In the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, sales of ethanol were concentrated in 5239 and 5452 customers, which represented 100% of total sales of ethanol for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. Approximately 86% and 99%78% of the Group’s sales of sugar were concentrated in 66124 and 1976 well-known traders for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. The remaining 14%In 2021 and 1%, which mainly relates to “crystal sugar”, were dispersed among several customers. In 2019 and 2018,2020, energy sales are 94%95% and 97%96% concentrated in 5572 and 52 major customers. In the dairy segment, 70%67% and 92%65% of the sales were concentrated in 3618 and 21 well-known customers in 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
No credit limits were exceeded during the reporting periods and management does not expect any losses from non-performance by these counterparties. If any of the Group’s customers are independently rated, these ratings are used. Otherwise, the Group assesses the credit quality of the customer taking into account its financial position, past experience and other factors (see Note 1817 for details). The Group may seek cash collateral, letter of credit or parent company guarantees, as considered appropriate. Sales to customers are primarily made by credit with customary payment terms. The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset in the statement of financial position after deducting any impairment allowance. The Group’s exposure of credit risk arising from trade receivables is set out in Note 19.18.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
2. Financial risk management (continued)
The Group is exposed to counterparty credit risk on cash and cash equivalent balances. The Group holds cash on deposit with a number of financial institutions. The Group manages its credit risk exposure by limiting individual deposits to clearly defined limits. The Group only deposits with high quality banks and financial institutions. As of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the total amount of cash and cash equivalents mainly comprise cash in banks and short-term bank deposits. The Group is authorized to transact with banks rated “BBB+” or higher. As of December 31, 20192021 and 2018, 82020, 4 and 56 banks (primarily JP Morgan, HSBC, Banco Safra, Banco do Brasil, Banco Bradesco, Banco Santander, Credit AgricoleGalicia, HSBC and Banco ABC)Itaú) accounted for more than 85%81% and 78%81%, respectively, of the total cash deposited. The remaining amount of cash and cash equivalents relates to cash in hand. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, the Group invested in fixed-term bank deposits with mainly six3 bank (HSBC, Credit Agricole,(Santander, Banco do Brasil Banco Safra, Banco Bradesco and Banco ABC)HSBC) and also entered into derivative contracts (currency forward). The Group’s exposure of credit risk arising from cash and cash equivalents is set out in Note 21.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
2. | Financial risk management (continued) |
20.
The Group’s primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage currency exchange rate risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk. The Group generally enters into derivative transactions with high-credit-quality counterparties and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one counterparty based on an analysis of that counterparty's relative credit standing. The amounts subject to credit risk related to derivative instruments are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which counterparty's obligations exceed the obligations with that counterparty.
The Group also entered into crop commodity futures traded in the established trading markets of Argentina and Brazil through well-rated brokers. Management does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations.
•Capital risk management
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, it may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or buy own shares or sell assets to reduce debt. Consistent with others in the industry, the Group monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as total debt (including current and non-current borrowings as shown in the consolidated statement of financial position, if applicable) divided by total capital. Total capital is calculated as equity, as shown in the consolidated statement of financial position, plus total debt.borrowings. During the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, the strategy was to maintain the gearing ratio within 0.40 to 0.60, as follows:
| | | | | | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | |
| Total debt | 968,280 |
| | 862,116 |
| |
| Total borrowings | | Total borrowings | 817,651 | | | 971,090 | |
| Total equity | 1,028,883 |
| | 1,108,145 |
| Total equity | 1,047,830 | | | 963,724 | |
| Total capital | 1,997,163 |
| | 1,970,261 |
| Total capital | 1,865,481 | | | 1,934,814 | |
| Gearing ratio | 0.48 |
| | 0.44 |
| Gearing ratio | 0.44 | | | 0.50 | |
•Derivative financial instruments
As part of its business operations, the Group uses a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to the financial risks discussed above. As part of this strategy, the Group may enter into derivatives of (i) interest rate to manage the composition of floating and fixed rate debt; (ii) currency to manage exchange rate risk, and (iii) crop (future contracts and put and call options) to manage its exposure to price volatility stemming from its integrated crop production activities. The Group’s policy is not to use derivatives for speculative purposes.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
2. Financial risk management (continued)
Derivative financial instruments involve, to a varying degree, elements of market and credit risk not recognized in the financial statements. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from price movements is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions, assets and liabilities, being hedged. The counterparties to the agreements relating to the Group’s contracts generally are large institutions with credit ratings equal to or higher than BBB+. The Group continually monitors the credit rating of such counterparties and seeks to limit its financial exposure to any one financial institution. While the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions, they do not represent the amount of the Group’s exposure to credit risk. The amounts potentially subject to credit risk (arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts) are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparties’ obligations under the contracts exceed the Group’s obligations to the counterparties.
The following tables show the outstanding positions for each type of derivative contract as of the date of each statement of financial position:
▪Futures/ options
As of December 31, 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2021 |
Type of
derivative contract | | Quantities
(thousands)
(**) | | Notional
amount | | Fair
Value Asset/
(Liability) | | (Loss)/Gain
(*) |
| Futures: | | | | | | | | |
| Sale | | | | | | | | |
| Corn | | 6 | | | 935 | | | 157 | | | 157 | |
| Soybean | | 55 | | | 17,782 | | | (1,283) | | | (1,283) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Sugar | | 87 | | | 35,922 | | | 671 | | | 292 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total | | 148 | | | 54,639 | | | (455) | | | (834) | |
As of December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2020 |
Type of
derivative contract | | Quantities
(thousands)
(**) | | Notional
amount | | Fair
Value Asset/
(Liability) | | (Loss)/Gain
(*) |
| Futures: | | | | | | | | |
| Sale | | | | | | | | |
| Corn | | 52 | | | 6,027 | | | (2,846) | | | 2,846 | |
| Soybean | | 32 | | | 7,242 | | | (3,380) | | | 3,380 | |
| Wheat | | (19) | | | (4,272) | | | 151 | | | (151) | |
| Sugar | | 217 | | | 63,025 | | | (6,738) | | | 5,538 | |
| Ethanol | | 1 | | | 277 | | | (20) | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total | | 283 | | | 72,299 | | | (12,833) | | | 11,616 | |
(*) Included in the line item “(Loss) / Gain from commodity derivative financial instruments” of Note 8.
(**) All quantities expressed in tons and m3.
Commodity future contract fair values are computed with reference to quoted market prices on future exchanges.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
2. | Financial risk management (continued) |
2. Financial risk management (continued)
The following tables show
▪Interest rate swap
In December 31, 2020 the outstanding positions for each typeGroup's subsidiary in Brazil, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a interest rate swap operation with Itaú BBA in an aggregate amount of derivativeUS$400 million. In these operation Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema receives IPCA (Extended National Consumer Price Index) plus 4.24% per year, and pays CDI (an interbank floating interest rate in Reais) plus 1.85% per year. This swap expires semiannually until December, 2026. This contract asresulted in a recognition of a loss of US$2.1 million in 2021 and a gain of US$1.8 million in 2020.
▪Currency forward
During the year ended December 31, 2021 the Group did not enter into no currency forward contracts with Brazilian banks. During the year ended December 31, 2020 the Group entered into several currency forward contracts with Brazilian banks in order to hedge the fluctuation of the dateBrazilian Reais against the U.S. Dollar. These contracts resulted in a recognition of eacha loss of US$1.9 million in 2020.
Gains and losses on currency forward contracts are included within “Financial results, net” in the statement of financial position:
As of December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2019 |
Type of derivative contract | | Quantities (thousands) (**) | | Notional amount | | Fair Value Asset/ (Liability) | | (Loss)/Gain (*) |
| Futures: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Sale | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Corn | | 221 |
| | 923 |
| | 445 |
| | (446 | ) |
| Soybean | | 107 |
| | 7,118 |
| | 759 |
| | (687 | ) |
| Wheat | | 13 |
| | 515 |
| | (28 | ) | | 28 |
|
| Sugar | | 101,498 |
| | 29,409 |
| | (1,342 | ) | | 1,155 |
|
| Total | | 101,839 |
| | 37,965 |
| | (166 | ) | | 50 |
|
As of December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2018 |
Type of derivative contract | | Quantities (thousands) (**) | | Notional amount | | Fair Value Asset/ (Liability) | | (Loss)/Gain (*) |
| Futures: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Sale | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Corn | | (97 | ) | | (14,791 | ) | | (209 | ) | | (209 | ) |
| Soybean | | 25 |
| | 8,089 |
| | 527 |
| | 177 |
|
| Wheat | | (14 | ) | | (2,483 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (85 | ) |
| Sugar | | 208,837 |
| | 64,753 |
| | 5,483 |
| | 12,765 |
|
| Options: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Buy put | | | | | | | | |
| Sugar | | 6,326 |
| | 128 |
| | 267 |
| | 393 |
|
| Sell call | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Sugar | | 1,118 |
| | 132 |
| | (25 | ) | | (156 | ) |
| Total | | 216,195 |
| | 55,828 |
| | 6,032 |
| | 12,885 |
|
(*) Included in the line item “(Loss) / Gain from commodity derivative financial instruments” of Note 8.
(**) All quantities expressed in tons and m3.
Commodity future contract fair values are computed with reference to quoted market prices on future exchanges.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
2. | Financial risk management (continued) |
| |
▪ | Foreign currency floating-to-fixed interest rate swap |
In July 2016 the Group's subsidiary in Brazil, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais 90 million loan with Bradesco. The loan bears interest at a variable rate of CDI (an interbanking floating interest rate in US$) plus 2.1% per year. At same moment and with same bank, the Company entered into a swap operation, which intention was to effectively convert the principal amount and interest rate denominated in Reais, to a principal amount an interest rate denominated in US$, plus a fixed rate of 6.55%. The swap expired on September 2017. As of expiration date, the group recognized in 2017 a gain of US$ 3 million included whitin "Financial Results, net.”
During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Group entered into several currency forward contracts with Brazilian banks in order to hedge the fluctuation of the Brazilian Reais against the U.S. Dollar for a total aggregate amount of US$ 5.1 million. The currency forward contracts entered in 2019 had maturity dates ranging between February 2020 and October 2020. These contracts resulted in a recognition of a loss of US$ 1.1 million and US$ 2.0 million in 2019 and 2018 respectively.
During the year ended on December 31, 2018, the Group entered into several currency forward contracts in order to hedge the fluctuation of the U.S. Dollar against Euro for a total notional amount of US$ 4.9 million. The currency forward contracts maturity date was January 2019. The outstanding contracts resulted in the recognition of a gain amounting to US$ 0.1 million in 2018.
Gains and losses on currency forward contracts are included within “Financial results, net” in the statement of income.
As Petrobras (the Brazilian oil state company) started to track the movements of the international gasoline to set its domestic prices in 2017, the Group's subsidiary in Brazil, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a swap operation in March 2018, which intention was to mitigate the effects of the gasoline volatility in the ethanol prices sold by the company. The swaps expired according to the due dates and as of December 31, 2018 all the swaps positions were already liquidated. The Group recorded a loss of US$ 1.6 million.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
3. Segment information
According to IFRS 8, operating segments are identified based on the ‘management approach’. Operating segments are components of an entity about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Group’s CODM is the Management Committee. IFRS 8 stipulates external segment reporting based on the Group’s internal organizational and management structure and on internal financial reporting to the chief operating decision maker.
The Group operates in three3 major lines of business, namely, Farming; Sugar, Ethanol and Energy; and Land Transformation.
•The Company’s ‘Farming’ is further comprised of five3 reportable segments:
•The Company’s ‘Crops’ Segment consists of planting, harvesting and sale of grains, oilseeds and fibers (including wheat, corn, soybeans, peanuts, cotton and sunflowers, among others), and to a lesser extent the provision of grain warehousing/conditioning and handling and drying services to third parties. Each underlying crop in this segment does not represent a separate operating segment. Management seeks to maximize the use of the land through the cultivation of one or more type of crops. Types and surface amount of crops cultivated may vary from harvest year to harvest year depending on several factors, some of them out of the Group´sGroup’s control. Management is focused on the long-term performance of the productive land, and to that extent, the performance is assessed considering the aggregated combination, if any, of crops planted in the land. A single manager is responsible for the management of operating activity of all crops rather than for each individual crop.
•The Company’s ‘Rice’ Segment consists of planting, harvesting, processing and marketing of rice.
•The Company’s ‘Dairy’ Segment consists of the production and sale of raw milk and industrialized products, including UHT, cheese and powder milk among others.
•The Company’s ‘All Other Segments’ consists of the aggregation of the remaining non-reportable operating segments, which do not meet the quantitative thresholds for disclosure, namely, Coffee and Cattle.
•The Company’s ‘Sugar, Ethanol and Energy’ Segment consists of cultivating sugarcane which is processed in owned sugar mills, transformed into ethanol, sugar and electricity and marketed;
•The Company’s ‘Land Transformation’ Segment comprises the (i) identification and acquisition of underdeveloped and undermanaged farmland businesses; and (ii) realization of value through the strategic disposition of assets (generating profits).
Total segment assets and liabilities are measured in a manner consistent with that of the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. These assets and liabilities are allocated based on the operations of the segment and the physical location of the asset.
Effective July 1, 2018, the Group applied IAS 29 “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies” (“IAS 29”) to its operations in Argentina. IAS 29 “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies” requires that the financial statements of entities whose functional currency is that of a hyperinflationary economy be adjusted for the effects of changes in the general price index and be expressed in terms of the current unit of measurement at the closing date of the reporting period (“inflation accounting”). In order to determine whether an economy is classified as hyperinflationary, IAS 29 sets forth a series of factors to be considered, including whether the amount of cumulative inflation nears or exceeds a threshold of 100 %.% accumulated in three years. Accordingly, Argentina has been classified as a hyperinflationary economy under the terms of IAS 29 from July 1, 2018. (Please see Note 33 - Basis of preparation and presentations).
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
3. Segment information (continued)
According to IAS 29, all Argentine Peso-denominated non-monetary items in the statement of financial position are adjusted by applying a general price index from the date they were initially recognized to the end of the reporting period. Likewise, all Argentine Peso-denominated items in the statement of income should be expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period, consequently, income statement items are adjusted by applying a general price index on a monthly basis from the dates they were initially recognized in the financial statements to the end of the reporting period. This process is called “re-measurement”.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
3. | Segment information (continued) |
Once the re-measurement process is completed, all Argentine Peso denominated accounts are translated into U.S. Dollars, the Group’s reporting currency, applying the guidelines in IAS 21 “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”(“IAS 21”). IAS 21 requires that amounts be translated at the closing rate at the date of the most recent statement of financial position. This process is called “translation”.
The re-measurement and translation processes are applied on a monthly basis until year-end. Due to this process, the re-measured and translated results of operations for a given month are subject to change until year-end, affecting comparison and analysis.
Following the adoption of IAS 29 to the Argentine operations of the Group, management revised the information reviewed by the CODM. Accordingly, as from July 1, 2018, (commencement of hyper-inflation accounting in Argentina), the information provided to the CODM departs from the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 re-measurement and translation processes as follows. The segment results of the Argentinean operations for each reporting period were adjusted for inflation and translated into the Group’s reporting currency using the reporting period average exchange rate. The translated amounts were not subsequently re-measured and translated in accordance with the IAS 29 and IAS 21 procedures outlined above. From January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018, the Group’s segment results were still based on the IFRS measurement principles adopted until June 30, 2018.
In order to evaluate the economic performance of businesses on a monthly basis, results of operations in Argentina are based on monthly data that has been adjusted for inflation and converted into the average exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar each month. These already converted figures are subsequently not readjusted and reconverted as described above under IAS 29 and IAS 21. It should be noted that this translation methodology for evaluating segment information is the same that the company uses to translate results of operation from its other subsidiaries from other countries that have not been designated hyperinflationary economies because it allows for a more accurate analysis of the economic performance of its business as a whole.
The Group’s CODM believes that the exclusion of the re-measurement and translation processes from the segment reporting structure allows for a more useful presentation and facilitates period-to-period comparison and performance analysis.
The following tables show a reconciliation of each reportable segment as per the information reviewed by the CODM and the reportable segment measured in accordance with IAS 29 and IAS 21 as per the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 20192021, 2020 and 2018.2019.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
3. Segment information (continued)
Segment reconciliation for the year ended December 31, 2019:2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021 |
| Crops | | Rice | | Dairy |
| Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 228,894 | | | 11,836 | | | 240,730 | | | 130,526 | | | 4,343 | | | 134,869 | | | 172,803 | | | 10,251 | | | 183,054 | |
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (203,148) | | | (10,083) | | | (213,231) | | | (109,709) | | | (2,336) | | | (112,045) | | | (149,738) | | | (8,339) | | | (158,077) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 65,704 | | | 8,286 | | | 73,990 | | | 37,119 | | | 6,715 | | | 43,834 | | | 18,336 | | | 1,559 | | | 19,895 | |
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | (10,163) | | | (1,221) | | | (11,384) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 81,287 | | | 8,818 | | | 90,105 | | | 57,936 | | | 8,722 | | | 66,658 | | | 41,401 | | | 3,471 | | | 44,872 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (10,273) | | | (827) | | | (11,100) | | | (8,891) | | | (869) | | | (9,760) | | | (4,715) | | | (541) | | | (5,256) | |
| Selling expenses | (21,925) | | | (1,494) | | | (23,419) | | | (16,618) | | | (1,490) | | | (18,108) | | | (20,779) | | | (1,793) | | | (22,572) | |
| Other operating income, net | (3,538) | | | (185) | | | (3,723) | | | 239 | | | 46 | | | 285 | | | (150) | | | (20) | | | (170) | |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 45,551 | | | 6,312 | | | 51,863 | | | 32,666 | | | 6,409 | | | 39,075 | | | 15,757 | | | 1,117 | | | 16,874 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (6,501) | | | (634) | | | (7,135) | | | (8,080) | | | (814) | | | (8,894) | | | (7,144) | | | (797) | | | (7,941) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021 |
| All other segments | | Land transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 3,490 | | | 199 | | | 3,689 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,097,723 | | | 26,629 | | | 1,124,352 | |
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (2,966) | | | (145) | | | (3,111) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (834,062) | | | (20,903) | | | (854,965) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 1,380 | | | (18) | | | 1,362 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 211,198 | | | 16,542 | | | 227,740 | |
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (11,658) | | | (1,221) | | | (12,879) | |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 1,904 | | | 36 | | | 1,940 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 463,201 | | | 21,047 | | | 484,248 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (173) | | | (14) | | | (187) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (22,119) | | | (1,908) | | | (24,027) | | | (65,635) | | | (4,159) | | | (69,794) | |
| Selling expenses | (273) | | | (17) | | | (290) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (306) | | | (21) | | | (327) | | | (112,847) | | | (4,815) | | | (117,662) | |
| Other operating income, net | (3,995) | | | (470) | | | (4,465) | | | 6,613 | | | — | | | 6,613 | | | 103 | | | (21) | | | 82 | | | (18,118) | | | (650) | | | (18,768) | |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | (2,537) | | | (465) | | | (3,002) | | | 6,613 | | | — | | | 6,613 | | | (22,322) | | | (1,950) | | | (24,272) | | | 266,601 | | | 11,423 | | | 278,024 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (175) | | | (15) | | | (190) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (738) | | | (49) | | | (787) | | | (166,619) | | | (2,309) | | | (168,928) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | (3,884) | | | (447) | | | (4,331) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,884) | | | (447) | | | (4,331) | |
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment has not been reconciled due to the lack of difference.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy |
| | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 168,938 |
| | (2,492 | ) | | 166,446 |
| | 102,162 |
| | (1,006 | ) | | 101,156 |
| | 84,767 |
| | (945 | ) | | 83,822 |
|
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (159,197 | ) | | 2,687 |
| | (156,510 | ) | | (74,480 | ) | | 529 |
| | (73,951 | ) | | (77,532 | ) | | 838 |
| | (76,694 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 30,290 |
| | (549 | ) | | 29,741 |
| | 13,194 |
| | (979 | ) | | 12,215 |
| | 13,741 |
| | (231 | ) | | 13,510 |
|
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,542 |
| | 283 |
| | 1,825 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 41,573 |
| | (71 | ) | | 41,502 |
| | 40,876 |
| | (1,456 | ) | | 39,420 |
| | 20,976 |
| | (338 | ) | | 20,638 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (5,446 | ) | | (87 | ) | | (5,533 | ) | | (6,752 | ) | | 147 |
| | (6,605 | ) | | (4,188 | ) | | 90 |
| | (4,098 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (12,852 | ) | | 128 |
| | (12,724 | ) | | (21,072 | ) | | 498 |
| | (20,574 | ) | | (6,252 | ) | | 18 |
| | (6,234 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | (1,133 | ) | | (225 | ) | | (1,358 | ) | | 282 |
| | (15 | ) | | 267 |
| | (635 | ) | | (68 | ) | | (703 | ) |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 22,142 |
| | (255 | ) | | 21,887 |
| | 13,334 |
| | (826 | ) | | 12,508 |
| | 9,901 |
| | (298 | ) | | 9,603 |
|
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (4,662 | ) | | (137 | ) | | (4,799 | ) | | (6,994 | ) | | 171 |
| | (6,823 | ) | | (5,064 | ) | | 98 |
| | (4,966 | ) |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
3. | 3. Segment information (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 |
| | All other segments | | Corporate | | Total |
| | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 3,904 |
| | 27 |
| | 3,931 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 891,554 |
| | (4,416 | ) | | 887,138 |
|
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (3,412 | ) | | (40 | ) | | (3,452 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (675,187 | ) | | 4,014 |
| | (671,173 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | (40 | ) | | 53 |
| | 13 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 70,295 |
| | (1,706 | ) | | 68,589 |
|
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,542 |
| | 283 |
| | 1,825 |
|
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 452 |
| | 40 |
| | 492 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 288,204 |
| | (1,825 | ) | | 286,379 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (167 | ) | | 17 |
| | (150 | ) | | (19,319 | ) | | 428 |
| | (18,891 | ) | | (57,797 | ) | | 595 |
| | (57,202 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (171 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (182 | ) | | (165 | ) | | 23 |
| | (142 | ) | | (107,628 | ) | | 656 |
| | (106,972 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | (956 | ) | | 602 |
| | (354 | ) | | (175 | ) | | 21 |
| | (154 | ) | | (1,137 | ) | | 315 |
| | (822 | ) |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | (842 | ) | | 648 |
| | (194 | ) | | (19,659 | ) | | 472 |
| | (19,187 | ) | | 121,642 |
| | (259 | ) | | 121,383 |
|
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (181 | ) | | 4 |
| | (177 | ) | | (20 | ) | | 3 |
| | (17 | ) | | (174,578 | ) | | 139 |
| | (174,439 | ) |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | (927 | ) | | 602 |
| | (325 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (927 | ) | | 602 |
| | (325 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2020 |
| Crops | | Rice | | Dairy |
| Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 170,114 | | | (1,653) | | | 168,461 | | | 102,886 | | | (1,024) | | | 101,862 | | | 135,471 | | | (1,997) | | | 133,474 | |
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (150,745) | | | 1,495 | | | (149,250) | | | (74,395) | | | 565 | | | (73,830) | | | (117,754) | | | 1,747 | | | (116,007) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 41,038 | | | (934) | | | 40,104 | | | 19,449 | | | (772) | | | 18,677 | | | 12,638 | | | (294) | | | 12,344 | |
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 7,078 | | | (71) | | | 7,007 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2) | | | — | | | (2) | |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 67,485 | | | (1,163) | | | 67,061 | | | 47,940 | | | (1,231) | | | 46,709 | | | 30,353 | | | (544) | | | 29,809 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (6,816) | | | 122 | | | (6,694) | | | (7,045) | | | 146 | | | (6,899) | | | (4,896) | | | 108 | | | (4,788) | |
| Selling expenses | (18,265) | | | 267 | | | (17,998) | | | (14,170) | | | 247 | | | (13,923) | | | (13,824) | | | 284 | | | (13,540) | |
| Other operating income, net | (12,846) | | | (7) | | | (12,853) | | | 731 | | | (18) | | | 713 | | | (189) | | | 3 | | | (186) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 29,558 | | | (781) | | | 29,516 | | | 27,456 | | | (856) | | | 26,600 | | | 11,444 | | | (149) | | | 11,295 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (5,397) | | | 111 | | | (5,286) | | | (6,652) | | | 147 | | | (6,505) | | | (6,709) | | | 141 | | | (6,568) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2020 |
| All other segments | | Land transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 2,545 | | | (37) | | | 2,508 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 822,475 | | | (4,711) | | | 817,764 | |
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (1,984) | | | 22 | | | (1,962) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (615,775) | | | 3,829 | | | (611,946) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 1,269 | | | (13) | | | 1,256 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 124,742 | | | (2,013) | | | 122,729 | |
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7,076 | | | (71) | | | 7,005 | |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 1,830 | | | (28) | | | 1,802 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 338,518 | | | (2,966) | | | 335,552 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (120) | | | 2 | | | (118) | | | — | | | (4) | | | (4) | | | (19,319) | | | 336 | | | (18,983) | | | (54,138) | | | 710 | | | (53,428) | |
| Selling expenses | (217) | | | 3 | | | (214) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (202) | | | 7 | | | (195) | | | (95,866) | | | 808 | | | (95,058) | |
| Other operating income, net | 1,069 | | | (2) | | | 1,067 | | | 7,934 | | | (14) | | | 7,920 | | | (161) | | | (8) | | | (169) | | | 2,033 | | | (46) | | | 1,987 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 2,562 | | | (25) | | | 2,537 | | | 7,934 | | | (18) | | | 7,916 | | | (19,682) | | | 335 | | | (19,347) | | | 190,547 | | | (1,494) | | | 189,053 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (138) | | | 3 | | | (135) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (876) | | | 14 | | | (862) | | | (142,288) | | | 416 | | | (141,872) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | 1,080 | | | (3) | | | 1,077 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,080 | | | (3) | | | 1,077 | |
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy, and Land Transformation segments have not been reconciled due to the lack of differences.
Segment reconciliation for the year ended December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy |
| | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 164,538 |
| | (9,120 | ) | | 155,418 |
| | 100,013 |
| | (4,610 | ) | | 95,403 |
| | 33,201 |
| | (3,491 | ) | | 29,710 |
|
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (165,988 | ) | | 9,052 |
| | (156,936 | ) | | (75,739 | ) | | 766 |
| | (74,973 | ) | | (31,488 | ) | | 3,361 |
| | (28,127 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 36,422 |
| | (7,755 | ) | | 28,667 |
| | 8,967 |
| | (4,842 | ) | | 4,125 |
| | 7,295 |
| | (1,840 | ) | | 5,455 |
|
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 2,704 |
| | (3,613 | ) | | (909 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 37,676 |
| | (11,436 | ) | | 26,240 |
| | 33,241 |
| | (8,686 | ) | | 24,555 |
| | 9,008 |
| | (1,970 | ) | | 7,038 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (4,239 | ) | | 37 |
| | (4,202 | ) | | (5,070 | ) | | (869 | ) | | (5,939 | ) | | (2,034 | ) | | (246 | ) | | (2,280 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (5,921 | ) | | 474 |
| | (5,447 | ) | | (15,465 | ) | | 1,375 |
| | (14,090 | ) | | (983 | ) | | 41 |
| | (942 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | 5,422 |
| | 1,741 |
| | 7,163 |
| | 275 |
| | (58 | ) | | 217 |
| | (1,055 | ) | | 58 |
| | (997 | ) |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 32,938 |
| | (9,184 | ) | | 23,754 |
| | 12,981 |
| | (8,238 | ) | | 4,743 |
| | 4,936 |
| | (2,117 | ) | | 2,819 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (1,697 | ) | | (329 | ) | | (2,026 | ) | | (5,846 | ) | | 5,840 |
| | (6 | ) | | (2,253 | ) | | (280 | ) | | (2,533 | ) |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
3. | 3. Segment information (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 |
| | All other segments | | Corporate | | Total |
| | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 1,919 |
| | (149 | ) | | 1,770 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 810,609 |
| | (17,370 | ) | | 793,239 |
|
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (1,412 | ) | | 99 |
| | (1,313 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (623,243 | ) | | 13,278 |
| | (609,965 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | (806 | ) | | (393 | ) | | (1,199 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 31,025 |
| | (14,830 | ) | | 16,195 |
|
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,704 |
| | (3,613 | ) | | (909 | ) |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | (299 | ) | | (443 | ) | | (742 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 221,095 |
| | (22,535 | ) | | 198,560 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (155 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (164 | ) | | (19,626 | ) | | 1,433 |
| | (18,193 | ) | | (56,426 | ) | | 346 |
| | (56,080 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (165 | ) | | 16 |
| | (149 | ) | | (178 | ) | | 33 |
| | (145 | ) | | (92,154 | ) | | 1,939 |
| | (90,215 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | 10,668 |
| | 2,728 |
| | 13,396 |
| | (167 | ) | | 36 |
| | (131 | ) | | 99,727 |
| | 4,505 |
| | 104,232 |
|
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 10,049 |
| | 2,292 |
| | 12,341 |
| | (19,971 | ) | | 1,502 |
| | (18,469 | ) | | 172,242 |
| | (15,745 | ) | | 156,497 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (171 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (177 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (153,169 | ) | | (1,085 | ) | | (154,254 | ) |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | 10,680 |
| | 2,729 |
| | 13,409 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,680 |
| | 2,729 |
| | 13,409 |
|
Segment reconciliation for the year ended December 31, 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 |
| Crops | | Rice | | Dairy |
| Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 168,938 | | | (2,492) | | | 166,446 | | | 102,162 | | | (1,006) | | | 101,156 | | | 84,767 | | | (945) | | | 83,822 | |
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (159,197) | | | 2,687 | | | (156,510) | | | (74,480) | | | 529 | | | (73,951) | | | (77,532) | | | 838 | | | (76,694) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 30,290 | | | (549) | | | 29,741 | | | 13,194 | | | (979) | | | 12,215 | | | 13,741 | | | (231) | | | 13,510 | |
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,542 | | | 283 | | | 1,825 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 41,573 | | | (71) | | | 41,502 | | | 40,876 | | | (1,456) | | | 39,420 | | | 20,976 | | | (338) | | | 20,638 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (5,446) | | | (87) | | | (5,533) | | | (6,752) | | | 147 | | | (6,605) | | | (4,188) | | | 90 | | | (4,098) | |
| Selling expenses | (12,852) | | | 128 | | | (12,724) | | | (21,072) | | | 498 | | | (20,574) | | | (6,252) | | | 18 | | | (6,234) | |
| Other operating income, net | (2,283) | | | (225) | | | (2,508) | | | 282 | | | (15) | | | 267 | | | (635) | | | (68) | | | (703) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | 20,992 | | | (255) | | | 20,737 | | | 13,334 | | | (826) | | | 12,508 | | | 9,901 | | | (298) | | | 9,603 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (4,662) | | | (137) | | | (4,799) | | | (6,994) | | | 171 | | | (6,823) | | | (5,064) | | | 98 | | | (4,966) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 |
| All other segments | | Corporate | | Total |
| Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income | | Total segment reporting | | Adjustment | | Total as per statement of income |
| Sales of goods sold and services rendered | 3,904 | | | 27 | | | 3,931 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 891,554 | | | (4,416) | | | 887,138 | |
| Cost of goods and services rendered | (3,412) | | | (40) | | | (3,452) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (675,187) | | | 4,014 | | | (671,173) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | (40) | | | 53 | | | 13 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 70,295 | | | (1,706) | | | 68,589 | |
| Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,542 | | | 283 | | | 1,825 | |
| Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses | 452 | | | 40 | | | 492 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 288,204 | | | (1,825) | | | 286,379 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (167) | | | 17 | | | (150) | | | (19,319) | | | 428 | | | (18,891) | | | (57,797) | | | 595 | | | (57,202) | |
| Selling expenses | (171) | | | (11) | | | (182) | | | (165) | | | 23 | | | (142) | | | (107,628) | | | 656 | | | (106,972) | |
| Other operating income, net | (956) | | | 602 | | | (354) | | | (175) | | | 21 | | | (154) | | | (1,137) | | | 315 | | | (822) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation | (842) | | | 648 | | | (194) | | | (19,659) | | | 472 | | | (19,187) | | | 121,642 | | | (259) | | | 121,383 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (181) | | | 4 | | | (177) | | | (20) | | | 3 | | | (17) | | | (174,578) | | | 139 | | | (174,439) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | (927) | | | 602 | | | (325) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (927) | | | 602 | | | (325) | |
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy, and Land Transformation segments have not been reconciled due to the lack of differences.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
3. | Segment information (continued) |
3. Segment information (continued)
The following table presents information with respect to the Group’s reportable segments. Certain other activities of a holding function nature not allocable to the segments are disclosed in the column ‘Corporate’.
Segment analysis for the year ended December 31, 20192021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Farming | | Sugar,
Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Farming
subtotal | | | | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 228,894 | | | 130,526 | | | 172,803 | | | 3,490 | | | 535,713 | | | 562,010 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,097,723 | |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (203,148) | | | (109,709) | | | (149,738) | | | (2,966) | | | (465,561) | | | (368,501) | | | — | | | — | | | (834,062) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 65,704 | | | 37,119 | | | 18,336 | | | 1,380 | | | 122,539 | | | 88,659 | | | — | | | — | | | 211,198 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | (10,163) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (10,163) | | | (1,495) | | | — | | | — | | | (11,658) | |
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | 81,287 | | | 57,936 | | | 41,401 | | | 1,904 | | | 182,528 | | | 280,673 | | | — | | | — | | | 463,201 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (10,273) | | | (8,891) | | | (4,715) | | | (173) | | | (24,052) | | | (19,464) | | | — | | | (22,119) | | | (65,635) | |
| Selling expenses | (21,925) | | | (16,618) | | | (20,779) | | | (273) | | | (59,595) | | | (52,946) | | | — | | | (306) | | | (112,847) | |
| Other operating income, net | (3,538) | | | 239 | | | (150) | | | (3,995) | | | (7,444) | | | (17,390) | | | 6,613 | | | 103 | | | (18,118) | |
| Profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation | 45,551 | | | 32,666 | | | 15,757 | | | (2,537) | | | 91,437 | | | 190,873 | | | 6,613 | | | (22,322) | | | 266,601 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (6,501) | | | (8,080) | | | (7,144) | | | (175) | | | (21,900) | | | (143,981) | | | — | | | (738) | | | (166,619) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,884) | | | (3,884) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,884) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (unrealized) | 14,399 | | | 4,117 | | | (6,271) | | | 8,904 | | | 21,149 | | | (16,294) | | | — | | | — | | | 4,855 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) | 51,305 | | | 33,002 | | | 24,607 | | | (7,524) | | | 101,390 | | | 104,953 | | | — | | | — | | | 206,343 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) | (4,001) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4,001) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4,001) | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) | (6,162) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (6,162) | | | (1,495) | | | — | | | — | | | (7,657) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Farmlands and farmland improvements, net | 448,608 | | | 146,795 | | | 2,143 | | | 56,315 | | | 653,861 | | | 73,979 | | | — | | | — | | | 727,840 | |
| Machinery, equipment and other fixed assets, net | 47,122 | | | 29,543 | | | 81,516 | | | 1,641 | | | 159,822 | | | 158,611 | | | — | | | — | | | 318,433 | |
| Bearer plants, net | 892 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 892 | | | 294,090 | | | — | | | — | | | 294,982 | |
| Work in progress | 3,444 | | | 33,200 | | | 27,341 | | | 1,496 | | | 65,481 | | | 15,887 | | | — | | | — | | | 81,368 | |
| Right of use assest | 13,005 | | | 3,361 | | | 930 | | | — | | | 17,296 | | | 243,469 | | | — | | | 11 | | | 260,776 | |
| Investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | 32,132 | | | 32,132 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 32,132 | |
| Goodwill | 7,074 | | | 979 | | | 4,660 | | | — | | | 12,713 | | | 3,913 | | | — | | | — | | | 16,626 | |
| Biological assets | 54,886 | | | 42,729 | | | 18,979 | | | 7,257 | | | 123,851 | | | 71,327 | | | — | | | — | | | 195,178 | |
| Finished goods | 37,225 | | | 5,015 | | | 15,157 | | | — | | | 57,397 | | | 80,857 | | | — | | | — | | | 138,254 | |
| Raw materials, stocks held by third parties and others | 42,253 | | | 14,797 | | | 10,416 | | | 579 | | | 68,045 | | | 33,225 | | | — | | | — | | | 101,270 | |
| Total segment assets | 654,509 | | | 276,419 | | | 161,142 | | | 99,420 | | | 1,191,490 | | | 975,358 | | | — | | | 11 | | | 2,166,859 | |
| Borrowings | 31,755 | | | 34,230 | | | 62,061 | | | — | | | 128,046 | | | 524,461 | | | — | | | 165,144 | | | 817,651 | |
| Lease liabilities | 14,106 | | | 4,157 | | | 924 | | | — | | | 19,187 | | | 227,585 | | | — | | | 82 | | | 246,854 | |
| Total segment liabilities | 45,861 | | | 38,387 | | | 62,985 | | | — | | | 147,233 | | | 752,046 | | | — | | | 165,226 | | | 1,064,505 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Farming | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Farming subtotal | | | | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 168,938 |
| | 102,162 |
| | 84,767 |
| | 3,904 |
| | 359,771 |
| | 531,783 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 891,554 |
|
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (159,197 | ) | | (74,480 | ) | | (77,532 | ) | | (3,412 | ) | | (314,621 | ) | | (360,566 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (675,187 | ) |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 30,290 |
| | 13,194 |
| | 13,741 |
| | (40 | ) | | 57,185 |
| | 13,110 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 70,295 |
|
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,542 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,542 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,542 |
|
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | 41,573 |
| | 40,876 |
| | 20,976 |
| | 452 |
| | 103,877 |
| | 184,327 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 288,204 |
|
| General and administrative expenses | (5,446 | ) | | (6,752 | ) | | (4,188 | ) | | (167 | ) | | (16,553 | ) | | (21,925 | ) | | — |
| | (19,319 | ) | | (57,797 | ) |
| Selling expenses | (12,852 | ) | | (21,072 | ) | | (6,252 | ) | | (171 | ) | | (40,347 | ) | | (67,116 | ) | | — |
| | (165 | ) | | (107,628 | ) |
| Other operating income, net | (1,133 | ) | | 282 |
| | (635 | ) | | (956 | ) | | (2,442 | ) | | 126 |
| | 1,354 |
| | (175 | ) | | (1,137 | ) |
| Profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation | 22,142 |
| | 13,334 |
| | 9,901 |
| | (842 | ) | | 44,535 |
| | 95,412 |
| | 1,354 |
| | (19,659 | ) | | 121,642 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (4,662 | ) | | (6,994 | ) | | (5,064 | ) | | (181 | ) | | (16,901 | ) | | (157,657 | ) | | — |
| | (20 | ) | | (174,578 | ) |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (927 | ) | | (927 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (927 | ) |
| Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,022 |
| | — |
| | 8,022 |
|
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (unrealized) | 6,091 |
| | 509 |
| | (3,957 | ) | | (72 | ) | | 2,571 |
| | (851 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 1,720 |
|
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) | 24,199 |
| | 12,685 |
| | 17,698 |
| | 32 |
| | 54,614 |
| | 13,961 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 68,575 |
|
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) | (481 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (481 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (481 | ) |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) | 2,023 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,023 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,023 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Farmlands and farmland improvements, net | 474,922 |
| | 142,864 |
| | 611 |
| | 52,874 |
| | 671,271 |
| | 63,594 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 734,865 |
|
| Machinery, equipment and other fixed assets, net | 29,038 |
| | 25,425 |
| | 74,403 |
| | 507 |
| | 129,373 |
| | 316,304 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 445,677 |
|
| Bearer plants, net | 592 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 592 |
| | 252,928 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 253,520 |
|
| Work in progress | 11,457 |
| | 15,669 |
| | 15,394 |
| | 1,214 |
| | 43,734 |
| | 15,424 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 59,158 |
|
| Right of use assest | 4,378 |
| | 567 |
| | 371 |
| | — |
| | 5,316 |
| | 231,832 |
| | — |
| | 905 |
| | 238,053 |
|
| Investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34,295 |
| | 34,295 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34,295 |
|
| Goodwill | 9,896 |
| | 3,890 |
| | — |
| | 817 |
| | 14,603 |
| | 5,417 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20,020 |
|
| Biological assets | 38,404 |
| | 21,484 |
| | 11,521 |
| | 3,673 |
| | 75,082 |
| | 55,354 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 130,436 |
|
| Finished goods | 17,830 |
| | 5,805 |
| | 4,779 |
| | — |
| | 28,414 |
| | 36,864 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 65,278 |
|
| Raw materials, stocks held by third parties and others | 17,187 |
| | 4,876 |
| | 5,156 |
| | 90 |
| | 27,309 |
| | 20,203 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47,512 |
|
| Total segment assets | 603,704 |
| | 220,580 |
| | 112,235 |
| | 93,470 |
| | 1,029,989 |
| | 997,920 |
| | — |
| | 905 |
| | 2,028,814 |
|
| Borrowings | 28,045 |
| | 45,602 |
| | 100,262 |
| | — |
| | 173,909 |
| | 240,001 |
| | — |
| | 554,370 |
| | 968,280 |
|
| Lease liabilities | 4,857 |
| | 490 |
| | 378 |
| | — |
| | 5,725 |
| | 209,700 |
| | — |
| | 959 |
| | 216,384 |
|
| Total segment liabilities | 32,902 |
| | 46,092 |
| | 100,640 |
| | — |
| | 179,634 |
| | 449,701 |
| | — |
| | 555,329 |
| | 1,184,664 |
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
3. | Segment information (continued) |
3. Segment information (continued)
Segment analysis for the year ended December 31, 20182020
| | | | Farming | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total | | Farming | | Sugar,
Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Farming subtotal | | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Farming
subtotal | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 164,538 |
| | 100,013 |
| | 33,201 |
| | 1,919 |
| | 299,671 |
| | 510,938 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 810,609 |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 170,114 | | | 102,886 | | | 135,471 | | | 2,545 | | | 411,016 | | | 411,459 | | | — | | | — | | | 822,475 | |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (165,988 | ) | | (75,739 | ) | | (31,488 | ) | | (1,412 | ) | | (274,627 | ) | | (348,616 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (623,243 | ) | Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (150,745) | | | (74,395) | | | (117,754) | | | (1,984) | | | (344,878) | | | (270,897) | | | — | | | — | | | (615,775) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 36,422 |
| | 8,967 |
| | 7,295 |
| | (806 | ) | | 51,878 |
| | (20,853 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 31,025 |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 41,038 | | | 19,449 | | | 12,638 | | | 1,269 | | | 74,394 | | | 50,348 | | | — | | | — | | | 124,742 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 2,704 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,704 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,704 |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 7,078 | | | — | | | (2) | | | — | | | 7,076 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7,076 | |
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | 37,676 |
| | 33,241 |
| | 9,008 |
| | (299 | ) | | 79,626 |
| | 141,469 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 221,095 |
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | 67,485 | | | 47,940 | | | 30,353 | | | 1,830 | | | 147,608 | | | 190,910 | | | — | | | — | | | 338,518 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (4,239 | ) | | (5,070 | ) | | (2,034 | ) | | (155 | ) | | (11,498 | ) | | (25,302 | ) | | — |
| | (19,626 | ) | | (56,426 | ) | General and administrative expenses | (6,816) | | | (7,045) | | | (4,896) | | | (120) | | | (18,877) | | | (15,942) | | | — | | | (19,319) | | | (54,138) | |
| Selling expenses | (5,921 | ) | | (15,465 | ) | | (983 | ) | | (165 | ) | | (22,534 | ) | | (69,442 | ) | | — |
| | (178 | ) | | (92,154 | ) | Selling expenses | (18,265) | | | (14,170) | | | (13,824) | | | (217) | | | (46,476) | | | (49,188) | | | — | | | (202) | | | (95,866) | |
| Other operating income, net | 5,422 |
| | 275 |
| | (1,055 | ) | | 10,668 |
| | 15,310 |
| | 48,357 |
| | 36,227 |
| | (167 | ) | | 99,727 |
| Other operating income, net | (12,846) | | | 731 | | | (189) | | | 1,069 | | | (11,235) | | | 5,495 | | | 7,934 | | | (161) | | | 2,033 | |
| | Profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation | 32,938 |
| | 12,981 |
| | 4,936 |
| | 10,049 |
| | 60,904 |
| | 95,082 |
| | 36,227 |
| | (19,971 | ) | | 172,242 |
| Profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation | 29,558 | | | 27,456 | | | 11,444 | | | 2,562 | | | 71,020 | | | 131,275 | | | 7,934 | | | (19,682) | | | 190,547 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (1,697 | ) | | (5,846 | ) | | (2,253 | ) | | (171 | ) | | (9,967 | ) | | (143,202 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (153,169 | ) | Depreciation and amortization | (5,397) | | | (6,652) | | | (6,709) | | | (138) | | | (18,896) | | | (122,516) | | | — | | | (876) | | | (142,288) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,680 |
| | 10,680 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,680 |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,080 | | | 1,080 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,080 | |
| Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | | Reverse of revaluation surplus derived from the disposals of assets before taxes | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10,198 | | | — | | | 10,198 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (unrealized) | 8,205 |
| | (181 | ) | | (599 | ) | | 102 |
| | 7,527 |
| | (37,808 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (30,281 | ) | Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (unrealized) | 12,211 | | | 3,975 | | | (5,151) | | | 2,258 | | | 13,293 | | | 19,682 | | | — | | | — | | | 32,975 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) | 28,217 |
| | 9,148 |
| | 7,894 |
| | (908 | ) | | 44,351 |
| | 16,955 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 61,306 |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) | 29,566 | | | 15,474 | | | 17,789 | | | (989) | | | 61,840 | | | 29,927 | | | — | | | — | | | 91,767 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) | (647 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (647 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (647 | ) | Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) | (481) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (481) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (481) | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) | 3,351 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,351 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,351 |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) | 7,559 | | | — | | | (2) | | | — | | | 7,557 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7,557 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Farmlands and farmland improvements, net | 547,842 |
| | 173,481 |
| | 727 |
| | 22,891 |
| | 744,941 |
| | 51,567 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 796,508 |
| Farmlands and farmland improvements, net | 454,212 | | | 141,661 | | | 1,911 | | | 53,902 | | | 651,686 | | | 64,065 | | | — | | | — | | | 715,751 | |
| Machinery, equipment and other fixed assets, net | 5,049 |
| | 23,135 |
| | 32,821 |
| | 459 |
| | 61,464 |
| | 338,607 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 400,071 |
| Machinery, equipment and other fixed assets, net | 39,517 | | | 18,567 | | | 67,859 | | | 539 | | | 126,482 | | | 153,490 | | | — | | | — | | | 279,972 | |
| Bearer plants, net | 427 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 427 |
| | 232,529 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 232,956 |
| Bearer plants, net | 685 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 685 | | | 304,144 | | | — | | | — | | | 304,829 | |
| Work in progress | 8,690 |
| | 5,214 |
| | 14,317 |
| | 18 |
| | 28,239 |
| | 22,665 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 50,904 |
| Work in progress | 820 | | | 23,381 | | | 18,365 | | | 1,178 | | | 43,744 | | | 13,996 | | | — | | | — | | | 57,740 | |
| Right of use assets | | Right of use assets | 4,275 | | | 2,472 | | | 1,288 | | | — | | | 8,035 | | | 201,365 | | | — | | | 294 | | | 209,694 | |
| Investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,725 |
| | 40,725 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,725 |
| Investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | 31,179 | | | 31,179 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 31,179 | |
| Goodwill | 9,463 |
| | 4,142 |
| | — |
| | 2,110 |
| | 15,715 |
| | 5,635 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,350 |
| Goodwill | 5,720 | | | 792 | | | 3,769 | | | — | | | 10,281 | | | 4,201 | | | — | | | — | | | 14,482 | |
| Biological assets | 27,347 |
| | 17,173 |
| | 10,298 |
| | 3,094 |
| | 57,912 |
| | 47,475 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 105,387 |
| Biological assets | 43,787 | | | 29,062 | | | 12,933 | | | 4,703 | | | 90,485 | | | 75,208 | | | — | | | — | | | 165,693 | |
| Finished goods | 29,144 |
| | 9,507 |
| | 1,170 |
| | — |
| | 39,821 |
| | 39,937 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 79,758 |
| Finished goods | 30,267 | | | 5,970 | | | 6,489 | | | — | | | 42,726 | | | 34,315 | | | — | | | — | | | 77,041 | |
| Raw materials,Stocks held by third parties and others | 15,834 |
| | 7,394 |
| | 2,217 |
| | 121 |
| | 25,566 |
| | 22,778 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48,344 |
| |
| Raw materials, stocks held by third parties and others | | Raw materials, stocks held by third parties and others | 21,893 | | | 4,519 | | | 7,377 | | | 318 | | | 34,107 | | | 22,313 | | | — | | | — | | | 56,420 | |
| Total segment assets | 643,796 |
| | 240,046 |
| | 61,550 |
| | 69,418 |
| | 1,014,810 |
| | 761,193 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,776,003 |
| Total segment assets | 601,176 | | | 226,424 | | | 119,991 | | | 91,819 | | | 1,039,410 | | | 873,097 | | | — | | | 294 | | | 1,912,801 | |
| Borrowings | 111,692 |
| | 58,999 |
| | 543 |
| | 4,860 |
| | 176,094 |
| | 600,810 |
| | — |
| | 85,212 |
| | 862,116 |
| Borrowings | 37,111 | | | 39,686 | | | 103,742 | | | — | | | 180,539 | | | 632,985 | | | — | | | 157,566 | | | 971,090 | |
| Lease liabilities | | Lease liabilities | 5,920 | | | 3,063 | | | 1,311 | | | — | | | 10,294 | | | 185,155 | | | — | | | 323 | | | 195,772 | |
| Total segment liabilities | 111,692 |
| | 58,999 |
| | 543 |
| | 4,860 |
| | 176,094 |
| | 600,810 |
| | — |
| | 85,212 |
| | 862,116 |
| Total segment liabilities | 43,031 | | | 42,749 | | | 105,053 | | | — | | | 190,833 | | | 818,140 | | | — | | | 157,889 | | | 1,166,862 | |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
3. | Segment information (continued) |
3. Segment information (continued)
Segment analysis for the year ended December 31, 20172019
| | | | Farming | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total | | Farming | | Sugar,
Ethanol and Energy | | Land Transformation | | Corporate | | Total |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Farming subtotal | | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Farming
subtotal | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 197,222 |
| | 86,478 |
| | 37,523 |
| | 1,336 |
| | 322,559 |
| | 610,619 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 933,178 |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 168,938 | | | 102,162 | | | 84,767 | | | 3,904 | | | 359,771 | | | 531,783 | | | — | | | — | | | 891,554 | |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (196,302 | ) | | (71,087 | ) | | (36,979 | ) | | (853 | ) | | (305,221 | ) | | (461,506 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (766,727 | ) | Cost of goods sold and services rendered | (159,197) | | | (74,480) | | | (77,532) | | | (3,412) | | | (314,621) | | | (360,566) | | | — | | | — | | | (675,187) | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 17,158 |
| | 10,236 |
| | 11,769 |
| | 267 |
| | 39,430 |
| | 23,790 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 63,220 |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 30,290 | | | 13,194 | | | 13,741 | | | (40) | | | 57,185 | | | 13,110 | | | — | | | — | | | 70,295 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 8,852 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,852 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,852 |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,542 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,542 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,542 | |
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | 26,930 |
| | 25,627 |
| | 12,313 |
| | 750 |
| | 65,620 |
| | 172,903 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 238,523 |
| Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses | 41,573 | | | 40,876 | | | 20,976 | | | 452 | | | 103,877 | | | 184,327 | | | — | | | — | | | 288,204 | |
| General and administrative expenses | (2,981 | ) | | (4,699 | ) | | (1,058 | ) | | (174 | ) | | (8,912 | ) | | (26,806 | ) | | — |
| | (21,581 | ) | | (57,299 | ) | General and administrative expenses | (5,446) | | | (6,752) | | | (4,188) | | | (167) | | | (16,553) | | | (21,925) | | | — | | | (19,319) | | | (57,797) | |
| Selling expenses | (7,501 | ) | | (13,324 | ) | | (711 | ) | | (156 | ) | | (21,692 | ) | | (73,664 | ) | | — |
| | (43 | ) | | (95,399 | ) | Selling expenses | (12,852) | | | (21,072) | | | (6,252) | | | (171) | | | (40,347) | | | (67,116) | | | — | | | (165) | | | (107,628) | |
| Other operating income, net | 7,719 |
| | 724 |
| | 662 |
| | 4,279 |
| | 13,384 |
| | 30,419 |
| | — |
| | (40 | ) | | 43,763 |
| Other operating income, net | (2,283) | | | 282 | | | (635) | | | (956) | | | (3,592) | | | 126 | | | 2,504 | | | (175) | | | (1,137) | |
| Profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation | 24,167 |
|
| 8,328 |
|
| 11,206 |
|
| 4,699 |
|
| 48,400 |
|
| 102,852 |
|
| — |
|
| (21,664 | ) |
| 129,588 |
| Profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation | 20,992 | | | 13,334 | | | 9,901 | | | (842) | | | 43,385 | | | 95,412 | | | 2,504 | | | (19,659) | | | 121,642 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (1,511 | ) | | (3,851 | ) | | (1,037 | ) | | (159 | ) | | (6,558 | ) | | (144,449 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (151,007 | ) | Depreciation and amortization | (4,662) | | | (6,994) | | | (5,064) | | | (181) | | | (16,901) | | | (157,657) | | | — | | | (20) | | | (174,578) | |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,302 |
| | 4,302 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,302 |
| Net (loss) / gain from Fair value adjustment of investment property | — | | | — | | | — | | | (927) | | | (927) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (927) | |
| | Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (unrealized) | 4,366 |
| | 5,346 |
| | 1,849 |
| | 159 |
| | 11,720 |
| | 2,925 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,645 |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (unrealized) | 6,091 | | | 509 | | | (3,957) | | | (72) | | | 2,571 | | | (851) | | | — | | | — | | | 1,720 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) | 12,792 |
| | 4,890 |
| | 9,920 |
| | 108 |
| | 27,710 |
| | 20,865 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48,575 |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) | 24,199 | | | 12,685 | | | 17,698 | | | 32 | | | 54,614 | | | 13,961 | | | — | | | — | | | 68,575 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) | 2,371 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,371 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,371 |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) | (481) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (481) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (481) | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) | 6,481 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,481 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,481 |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) | 2,023 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,023 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,023 | |
Total segment assets and liabilities are measured in a manner consistent with that of the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. These assets and liabilities are allocated based on the operations of the segment and the physical location of the asset.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
3. Segment information (continued)
Total reportable segments’ assets and liabilities are reconciled to total assets as per the statement of financial position as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Total reportable assets as per segment information | 2,166,859 | | | 1,912,801 | |
| Intangible assets (excluding goodwill) | 14,711 | | | 12,448 | |
| Deferred income tax assets | 10,321 | | | 19,821 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 188,080 | | | 197,928 | |
| Other assets | 1,079 | | | 854 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,585 | | | 2,102 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 199,766 | | | 336,282 | |
| Total assets as per the statement of financial position | 2,582,401 | | | 2,482,236 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Total reportable liabilities as per segment information | 1,064,505 | | | 1,166,862 | |
| Trade and other payables | 169,030 | | | 126,605 | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 265,848 | | | 182,377 | |
| Payroll and social liabilities | 26,294 | | | 24,408 | |
| Provisions for other liabilities | 5,986 | | | 4,359 | |
| Current income tax liabilities | 1,625 | | | 760 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,283 | | | 13,141 | |
| Total liabilities as per the statement of financial position | 1,534,571 | | | 1,518,512 | |
Non-current assets and revenues and fair value gains and losses are shown by geographic region. These are the regions in which the Group is active: Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and others.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Argentina | | Brazil | | Uruguay | | Others (*) | | Total |
| Property, plant and equipment | 868,527 | | | 542,710 | | | 11,386 | | | — | | | 1,422,623 | |
| Investment property | 32,132 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 32,132 | |
| Goodwill | 12,713 | | | 3,913 | | | — | | | — | | | 16,626 | |
| Non-current portion of biological assets | 19,355 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 19,355 | |
| | | | | | | | | — | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 284,026 | | | 385,959 | | | 427,661 | | | 77 | | | 1,097,723 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 120,255 | | | 88,659 | | | 2,284 | | | — | | | 211,198 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | (9,679) | | | (1,496) | | | (483) | | | — | | | (11,658) | |
(*) It includes the initial operations in Chile which are not disclosed separately due to its non significance.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
3. | 3. Segment information (continued) |
Total reportable segments’ assets and liabilities are reconciled to total assets as per the statement of financial position as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Total reportable assets as per segment information | 2,028,814 |
| | 1,776,003 |
|
| Intangible assets (excluding goodwill) | 13,659 |
| | 6,559 |
|
| Deferred income tax assets | 13,664 |
| | 16,191 |
|
| Trade and other receivables | 172,331 |
| | 197,506 |
|
| Other assets | 1,128 |
| | 1,192 |
|
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,435 |
| | 6,286 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 290,276 |
| | 273,635 |
|
| Total assets as per the statement of financial position | 2,521,307 |
| | 2,277,372 |
|
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Total reportable liabilities as per segment information | 1,184,664 |
| | 862,116 |
|
| Trade and other payables | 110,486 |
| | 106,437 |
|
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 165,508 |
| | 168,171 |
|
| Payroll and social liabilities | 26,417 |
| | 27,197 |
|
| Provisions for other liabilities | 3,172 |
| | 3,625 |
|
| Current income tax liabilities | 754 |
| | 1,398 |
|
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,423 |
| | 283 |
|
| Total liabilities as per the statement of financial position | 1,492,424 |
| | 1,169,227 |
|
Non-current assets and revenues and fair value gains and losses are shown by geographic region. These are the regions in which the Group is active: Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Argentina | | Brazil | | Uruguay | | Total |
| Property, plant and equipment | 811,653 | | | 535,857 | | | 10,782 | | | 1,358,292 | |
| Investment property | 31,179 | | | — | | | — | | | 31,179 | |
| Goodwill | 10,280 | | | 4,202 | | | — | | | 14,482 | |
| Non-current portion of biological assets | 14,725 | | | — | | | — | | | 14,725 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 389,018 | | | 411,779 | | | 21,678 | | | 822,475 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 72,391 | | | 50,348 | | | 2,003 | | | 124,742 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 6,770 | | | (88) | | | 394 | | | 7,076 | |
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Argentina | | Brazil | | Uruguay | | Total |
| Property, plant and equipment | 834,248 |
| | 648,471 |
| | 10,501 |
| | 1,493,220 |
|
| Investment property | 34,295 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34,295 |
|
| Goodwill | 14,603 |
| | 5,417 |
| | — |
| | 20,020 |
|
| Non-current portion of biological assets | 13,303 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,303 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 229,547 |
| | 462,174 |
| | 199,833 |
| | 891,554 |
|
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 55,760 |
| | 13,167 |
| | 1,368 |
| | 70,295 |
|
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 2,682 |
| | (8 | ) | | (1,132 | ) | | 1,542 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Argentina | | Brazil | | Uruguay | | Total |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 229,547 | | | 462,174 | | | 199,833 | | | 891,554 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 55,760 | | | 13,167 | | | 1,368 | | | 70,295 | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 2,682 | | | (8) | | | (1,132) | | | 1,542 | |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
3. | Segment information (continued) |
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Argentina | | Brazil | | Uruguay | | Total |
| Property, plant and equipment | 811,890 |
| | 656,586 |
| | 11,963 |
| | 1,480,439 |
|
| Investment property | 40,725 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,725 |
|
| Goodwill | 15,081 |
| | 6,269 |
| | — |
| | 21,350 |
|
| Non-current portion of biological assets | 11,270 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,270 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 207,480 |
| | 496,966 |
| | 106,163 |
| | 810,609 |
|
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 45,985 |
| | (13,541 | ) | | (1,419 | ) | | 31,025 |
|
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,148 |
| | 1,436 |
| | 120 |
| | 2,704 |
|
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Argentina | | Brazil | | Uruguay | | Total |
| Sales of goods and services rendered | 214,888 |
| | 545,859 |
| | 172,431 |
| | 933,178 |
|
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce | 36,341 |
| | 26,326 |
| | 553 |
| | 63,220 |
|
| Loss from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 5,705 |
| | 1,346 |
| | 1,801 |
| | 8,852 |
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Manufactured products and services rendered: | |
| | |
| | |
| Manufactured products and services rendered: | | | | | |
| Ethanol | 373,847 |
| | 324,661 |
| | 241,650 |
| Ethanol | 291,883 | | | 199,062 | | | 373,847 | |
| Sugar | 97,710 |
| | 128,377 |
| | 305,688 |
| Sugar | 208,365 | | | 171,102 | | | 97,710 | |
| Energy | 60,913 |
| | 57,797 |
| | 62,218 |
| Energy | 50,321 | | | 42,756 | | | 60,913 | |
| | Peanut | 28,928 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Peanut | 60,939 | | | 46,708 | | | 28,928 | |
| Sunflower | 7,534 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Sunflower | 11,282 | | | 10,433 | | | 7,534 | |
| Cotton | 623 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Cotton | 2,540 | | | 1,969 | | | 623 | |
| Rice | 97,515 |
| | 92,560 |
| | 83,849 |
| Rice | 127,272 | | | 96,397 | | | 97,515 | |
| Fluid milk (UHT) | 38,441 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Fluid milk (UHT) | 62,875 | | | 54,380 | | | 38,441 | |
| Powder milk | 20,722 |
| | 8,646 |
| | 2,713 |
| Powder milk | 62,728 | | | 40,500 | | | 20,722 | |
| Other diary products | 8,856 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Other diary products | 28,834 | | | 17,205 | | | 8,856 | |
| Soybean oil and meal | 1,062 |
| | 14,059 |
| | 6,119 |
| |
| | Services | 4,521 |
| | 487 |
| | 1,144 |
| Services | 7,309 | | | 4,774 | | | 4,521 | |
| Rental income | 564 |
| | 643 |
| | 771 |
| Rental income | 615 | | | 584 | | | 564 | |
| Others | 3,401 |
| | 7,826 |
| | 5,273 |
| Others | 13,069 | | | 5,623 | | | 4,463 | |
| | 744,637 |
| | 635,056 |
| | 709,425 |
| | 928,032 | | | 691,493 | | | 744,637 | |
| Agricultural produce and biological assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| Agricultural produce and biological assets: | | | | | |
| Soybean | 44,538 |
| | 66,471 |
| | 79,408 |
| Soybean | 71,687 | | | 44,271 | | | 44,538 | |
| Corn | 59,714 |
| | 33,106 |
| | 82,482 |
| Corn | 59,803 | | | 44,475 | | | 59,714 | |
| Wheat | 18,733 |
| | 30,091 |
| | 14,835 |
| Wheat | 27,349 | | | 14,457 | | | 18,733 | |
| Peanut | — |
| | 1,752 |
| | 3,648 |
| |
| | Sunflower | 701 |
| | 1,314 |
| | 3,163 |
| Sunflower | 6,167 | | | 633 | | | 701 | |
| Barley | 1,085 |
| | 1,203 |
| | 1,888 |
| Barley | 1,684 | | | 275 | | | 1,085 | |
| Seeds | 734 |
| | 461 |
| | 727 |
| Seeds | 1,559 | | | 1,732 | | | 734 | |
| Milk | 9,977 |
| | 19,267 |
| | 31,656 |
| Milk | 16,468 | | | 12,817 | | | 9,977 | |
| Cattle | 3,452 |
| | 1,279 |
| | 467 |
| Cattle | 3,111 | | | 1,959 | | | 3,452 | |
| Cattle for dairy | 2,169 |
| | 1,612 |
| | 2,913 |
| Cattle for dairy | 4,994 | | | 2,729 | | | 2,169 | |
| Others | 1,398 |
| | 1,627 |
| | 2,566 |
| Others | 3,498 | | | 2,923 | | | 1,398 | |
| | 142,501 |
| | 158,183 |
| | 223,753 |
| | 196,320 | | | 126,271 | | | 142,501 | |
| Total sales | 887,138 |
| | 793,239 |
| | 933,178 |
| Total sales | 1,124,352 | | | 817,764 | | | 887,138 | |
Commitments to sell commodities at a future date
The Group entered into contracts to sell non-financial instruments, mainly sugar, soybean and corn through sales forward contracts. Those contracts are held for purposes of delivery of the non-financial instrument in accordance with the Group’s expected sales. Accordingly, as the own use exception criteria are met;met, those contracts are not recorded as derivatives.
The notional amount of these contracts is US$ 71.775.9 million as of December 31, 2019 (2018:2021 (2020: US$ 63.342.2 million; 2017:2019: US$ 111.871.7 million) comprised primarily of 42,1252,497 thousand m3 of ethanol (US$ 4.81.98 million), 649,245483,984 thousand mwh of energy (US$ 39.024.22 million), 71,73956,491 thousand tons of soybean (U$S 10.3(US$19.60 million), 18,01228,903 thousand tons of wheat (US$ 3.16.95 million), and 56,255103,594 thousand tons of corn (US$ 13.519.93 million) which expire between January and December 2020.2022.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
5. Cost of goods sold and services rendered
| |
5. | Cost of goods sold and services rendered |
As of December 31, 2019:2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 |
| | 2019 | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugar,
Ethanol and
Energy | | Total |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total | |
| Finish goods at the beginning of 2019 (Note 20) | 29,144 |
| | 9,507 |
| | 1,170 |
| | — |
| | 39,937 |
| | 79,758 |
| |
| Finish goods at the beginning of 2021 (Note 19) | | Finish goods at the beginning of 2021 (Note 19) | 30,267 | | | 5,970 | | | 6,489 | | | — | | | 34,315 | | | 77,041 | |
| Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 6) | 33,952 |
| | 66,386 |
| | 68,851 |
| | — |
| | 354,964 |
| | 524,153 |
| Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 6) | 59,590 | | | 124,304 | | | 158,083 | | | — | | | 415,408 | | | 757,385 | |
| Purchases | 21,715 |
| | 3,095 |
| | (656 | ) | | — |
| | 44,577 |
| | 68,731 |
| Purchases | 26,880 | | | 569 | | | — | | | — | | | 4,860 | | | 32,309 | |
| Agricultural produce | 108,732 |
| | — |
| | 12,146 |
| | 3,452 |
| | — |
| | 124,330 |
| Agricultural produce | 224,788 | | | — | | | 16,468 | | | 3,111 | | | 10,944 | | | 255,311 | |
| Transfer to raw material | (35,757 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (35,757 | ) | Transfer to raw material | (73,068) | | | (7,240) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (80,308) | |
| Direct agricultural selling expenses | 15,752 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,752 |
| Direct agricultural selling expenses | 22,642 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 22,642 | |
| Tax recoveries (i) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (32,995 | ) | | (32,995 | ) | Tax recoveries (i) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (19,423) | | | (19,423) | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,825 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,825 |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | (11,384) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,495) | | | (12,879) | |
| Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2019 (Note 20) | (17,830 | ) | | (5,805 | ) | | (4,779 | ) | | — |
| | (36,864 | ) | | (65,278 | ) | |
| (-) Ethanol production costs recovery | | (-) Ethanol production costs recovery | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,669) | | | (3,669) | |
| Loss of idle productive capacity | | Loss of idle productive capacity | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 14,270 | | | 14,270 | |
| | Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2021 (Note 19) | | Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2021 (Note 19) | (37,225) | | | (5,015) | | | (15,157) | | | — | | | (80,857) | | | (138,254) | |
| Exchange differences | (1,023 | ) | | 768 |
| | (38 | ) | | — |
| | (9,053 | ) | | (9,346 | ) | Exchange differences | (29,259) | | | (6,543) | | | (7,806) | | | — | | | (5,852) | | | (49,460) | |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered, and direct agricultural selling expenses | 156,510 |
| | 73,951 |
| | 76,694 |
| | 3,452 |
| | 360,566 |
| | 671,173 |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered, and direct agricultural selling expenses | 213,231 | | | 112,045 | | | 158,077 | | | 3,111 | | | 368,501 | | | 854,965 | |
(i) Correspond to the presumed credit of ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de Serviços) over the sale values.
As of December 31, 2018:2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 |
| | 2018 | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugar,
Ethanol and
Energy | | Total |
| Finished goods at the beginning of 2020 | | Finished goods at the beginning of 2020 | 17,830 | | | 5,805 | | | 4,779 | | | — | | | 36,864 | | | 65,278 | |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total | |
| Finished goods at the beginning of 2018 | 21,146 |
| | 8,476 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32,266 |
| | 61,888 |
| |
| Adjustment of opening net book amount for the application of IAS 29 | 42 |
| | 1,354 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,396 |
| |
| Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 6) | 17,930 |
| | 61,600 |
| | 7,546 |
| | 36 |
| | 349,495 |
| | 436,607 |
| Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 6) | 44,074 | | | 79,507 | | | 102,933 | | | — | | | 285,627 | | | 512,141 | |
| Purchases | 63,533 |
| | 15,540 |
| | 872 |
| | — |
| | 43,531 |
| | 123,476 |
| Purchases | 3,648 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,088 | | | 9,736 | |
| | Agricultural produce | 104,941 |
| | — |
| | 20,879 |
| | 1,277 |
| | — |
| | 127,097 |
| Agricultural produce | 137,204 | | | — | | | 15,546 | | | 1,962 | | | — | | | 154,712 | |
| Transfer to raw material | (24,375 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (24,375 | ) | Transfer to raw material | (46,192) | | | (4,256) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (50,448) | |
| Direct agricultural selling expenses | 12,629 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,629 |
| Direct agricultural selling expenses | 16,467 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 16,467 | |
| Tax recoveries (i) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (32,380 | ) | | (32,380 | ) | Tax recoveries (i) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (21,765) | | | (21,765) | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | (909 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (909 | ) | Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 7,007 | | | — | | | (2) | | | — | | | — | | | 7,005 | |
| Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2018 (Note 20) | (29,144 | ) | | (9,507 | ) | | (1,170 | ) | | — |
| | (39,937 | ) | | (79,758 | ) | |
| Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2020 (Note 19) | | Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2020 (Note 19) | (30,267) | | | (5,970) | | | (6,489) | | | — | | | (34,315) | | | (77,041) | |
| Exchange differences | (8,857 | ) | | (2,490 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (4,359 | ) | | (15,706 | ) | Exchange differences | (521) | | | (1,256) | | | (760) | | | — | | | (1,602) | | | (4,139) | |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered, and direct agricultural selling expenses | 156,936 |
| | 74,973 |
| | 28,127 |
| | 1,313 |
| | 348,616 |
| | 609,965 |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered, and direct agricultural selling expenses | 149,250 | | | 73,830 | | | 116,007 | | | 1,962 | | | 270,897 | | | 611,946 | |
(i) Correspond to the presumed credit of ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de Serviços) over the sale values.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
5. | Cost of goods sold and services rendered (continued) |
5. Cost of goods sold and services rendered (continued)
As of December 31, 2017:2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2019 |
| | 2017 | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugar,
Ethanol and
Energy | | Total |
| Finished goods at the beginning of 2019 | | Finished goods at the beginning of 2019 | 29,144 | | | 9,507 | | | 1,170 | | | — | | | 39,937 | | | 79,758 | |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total | |
| Finished goods at the beginning of 2017 | 13,117 |
| | 5,473 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 49,601 |
| | 68,191 |
| |
| Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 6) | 5,565 |
| | 68,969 |
| | — |
| | 237 |
| | 378,864 |
| | 453,635 |
| Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 6) | 33,952 | | | 66,386 | | | 68,851 | | | — | | | 354,964 | | | 524,153 | |
| Purchases | 82,842 |
| | 7,779 |
| | 2,410 |
| | — |
| | 93,106 |
| | 186,137 |
| Purchases | 21,715 | | | 3,095 | | | — | | | — | | | 44,577 | | | 69,387 | |
| | Agricultural produce | 102,734 |
| | — |
| | 34,569 |
| | 616 |
| | 1,015 |
| | 138,934 |
| Agricultural produce | 108,732 | | | — | | | 12,146 | | | 3,452 | | | — | | | 124,330 | |
| Transfer to raw material | (12,998 | ) | | (1,354 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14,352 | ) | Transfer to raw material | (35,757) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (35,757) | |
| Direct agricultural selling expenses | 22,940 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 22,940 |
| Direct agricultural selling expenses | 15,752 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 15,752 | |
| Tax recoveries (i) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (28,478 | ) | | (28,478 | ) | Tax recoveries (i) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (32,995) | | | (32,995) | |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 8,852 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,852 |
| Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest | 1,825 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,825 | |
| Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2017 | (21,146 | ) | | (8,476 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (32,266 | ) | | (61,888 | ) | |
| Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2019 | | Finished goods at the end of December 31, 2019 | (17,830) | | | (5,805) | | | (4,779) | | | — | | | (36,864) | | | (65,278) | |
| Exchange differences | (5,604 | ) | | (1,304 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (336 | ) | | (7,244 | ) | Exchange differences | (1,023) | | | 768 | | | (694) | | | — | | | (9,053) | | | (10,002) | |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered, and direct agricultural selling expenses | 196,302 |
| | 71,087 |
| | 36,979 |
| | 853 |
| | 461,506 |
| | 766,727 |
| Cost of goods sold and services rendered, and direct agricultural selling expenses | 156,510 | | | 73,951 | | | 76,694 | | | 3,452 | | | 360,566 | | | 671,173 | |
(i) Correspond to the presumed credit of ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de Serviços) over the sale values.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
6. Expenses by nature
The Group presents the statement of income under the function of expense method. Under this method, expenses are classified according to their function as part of the line items “cost of goods sold and direct agricultural selling expenses”,expenses," “general and administrative expenses” and “selling expenses”.
The following table provides the additional disclosure required on the nature of expenses and their relationship to the function within the Group:
Expenses by nature for the year ended December 31, 2019:2021:
| | | | Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 5) | | General and Administrative Expenses | | Selling Expenses | | Total | | Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 5) | | General and
Administrative
Expenses | | Selling
Expenses | | Total |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total | | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugar,
Ethanol and
Energy | | Total | |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | 1,880 |
| | 4,738 |
| | 4,412 |
| | — |
| | 39,768 |
| | 50,798 |
| | 27,492 |
| | 6,211 |
| | 84,501 |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | 3,651 | | | 6,841 | | | 9,268 | | | — | | | 27,072 | | | 46,832 | | | 30,727 | | | 7,221 | | | 84,780 | |
| Raw materials and consumables | 314 |
| | 6,527 |
| | 10,151 |
| | — |
| | 15,683 |
| | 32,675 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32,675 |
| Raw materials and consumables | 578 | | | 373 | | | 24,755 | | | — | | | 13,036 | | | 38,742 | | | — | | | — | | | 38,742 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 2,581 |
| | 1,897 |
| | 2,140 |
| | — |
| | 122,025 |
| | 128,643 |
| | 11,212 |
| | 868 |
| | 140,723 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 3,930 | | | 2,692 | | | 3,590 | | | — | | | 108,709 | | | 118,921 | | | 14,280 | | | 1,304 | | | 134,505 | |
| Depreciation of right of use assets | — |
| | 116 |
| | 344 |
| | — |
| | 6,794 |
| | 7,254 |
| | 2,007 |
| | 5 |
| | 9,266 |
| Depreciation of right of use assets | — | | | 102 | | | 602 | | | — | | | 5,700 | | | 6,404 | | | 7,173 | | | 49 | | | 13,626 | |
| Fuel, lubricants and others | 228 |
| | 83 |
| | 1,381 |
| | — |
| | 25,430 |
| | 27,122 |
| | 593 |
| | 225 |
| | 27,940 |
| Fuel, lubricants and others | 336 | | | 89 | | | 1,730 | | | — | | | 24,747 | | | 26,902 | | | 854 | | | 279 | | | 28,035 | |
| Maintenance and repairs | 290 |
| | 1,120 |
| | 985 |
| | — |
| | 19,694 |
| | 22,089 |
| | 1,755 |
| | 534 |
| | 24,378 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 1,341 | | | 1,851 | | | 1,779 | | | — | | | 16,797 | | | 21,768 | | | 1,956 | | | 800 | | | 24,524 | |
| Freights | 146 |
| | 2,405 |
| | 1,959 |
| | — |
| | 784 |
| | 5,294 |
| | — |
| | 23,130 |
| | 28,424 |
| Freights | 644 | | | 8,154 | | | 2,377 | | | — | | | 607 | | | 11,782 | | | — | | | 38,970 | | | 50,752 | |
| Export taxes / selling taxes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 52,312 |
| | 52,312 |
| Export taxes / selling taxes | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 43,509 | | | 43,509 | |
| Export expenses | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,552 |
| | 5,552 |
| Export expenses | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 11,745 | | | 11,745 | |
| Contractors and services | 1,051 |
| | 138 |
| | 40 |
| | — |
| | 9,381 |
| | 10,610 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,610 |
| Contractors and services | 2,587 | | | 235 | | | 260 | | | — | | | 6,758 | | | 9,840 | | | — | | | — | | | 9,840 | |
| Energy transmission | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 88 |
| | 3,057 |
| | 3,145 |
| Energy transmission | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,347 | | | 2,347 | |
| Energy power | 725 |
| | 1,298 |
| | 1,659 |
| | — |
| | 1,181 |
| | 4,863 |
| | 145 |
| | 145 |
| | 5,153 |
| Energy power | 1,276 | | | 1,501 | | | 2,544 | | | — | | | 839 | | | 6,160 | | | 335 | | | 85 | | | 6,580 | |
| Professional fees | 20 |
| | 65 |
| | 127 |
| | — |
| | 175 |
| | 387 |
| | 8,065 |
| | 1,047 |
| | 9,499 |
| Professional fees | 78 | | | 84 | | | 140 | | | — | | | 692 | | | 994 | | | 7,600 | | | 815 | | | 9,409 | |
| Other taxes | 1 |
| | 74 |
| | 81 |
| | — |
| | 1,241 |
| | 1,397 |
| | 1,089 |
| | 28 |
| | 2,514 |
| Other taxes | 23 | | | 92 | | | 118 | | | — | | | 3,049 | | | 3,282 | | | 582 | | | 62 | | | 3,926 | |
| Contingencies | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 459 |
| | — |
| | 459 |
| Contingencies | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 855 | | | — | | | 855 | |
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | 83 |
| | 171 |
| | 78 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 332 |
| | 831 |
| | 125 |
| | 1,288 |
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | 162 | | | 319 | | | 257 | | | — | | | — | | | 738 | | | 1,863 | | | 251 | | | 2,852 | |
| Third parties raw materials | 7,136 |
| | 5,629 |
| | 18,131 |
| | — |
| | 11,243 |
| | 42,139 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 42,139 |
| Third parties raw materials | 2,804 | | | 2,852 | | | 62,737 | | | — | | | 15,240 | | | 83,633 | | | — | | | — | | | 83,633 | |
| Tax recoveries | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (396 | ) | | (396 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (396 | ) | Tax recoveries | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,546) | | | (1,546) | | | — | | | — | | | (1,546) | |
| Others | 431 |
| | 695 |
| | 681 |
| | — |
| | 2,324 |
| | 4,131 |
| | 3,466 |
| | 13,733 |
| | 21,330 |
| Others | 962 | | | 5,273 | | | 2,166 | | | — | | | 2,636 | | | 11,037 | | | 3,569 | | | 10,225 | | | 24,831 | |
| Subtotal | 14,886 |
| | 24,956 |
| | 42,169 |
| | — |
| | 255,327 |
| | 337,338 |
| | 57,202 |
| | 106,972 |
| | 501,512 |
| Subtotal | 18,372 | | | 30,458 | | | 112,323 | | | — | | | 224,336 | | | 385,489 | | | 69,794 | | | 117,662 | | | 572,945 | |
| Own agricultural produce consumed | 19,066 |
| | 41,430 |
| | 26,682 |
| | — |
| | 99,637 |
| | 186,815 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 186,815 |
| Own agricultural produce consumed | 41,218 | | | 93,846 | | | 45,760 | | | — | | | 191,072 | | | 371,896 | | | — | | | — | | | 371,896 | |
| Total | 33,952 |
| | 66,386 |
| | 68,851 |
| | — |
| | 354,964 |
| | 524,153 |
| | 57,202 |
| | 106,972 |
| | 688,327 |
| Total | 59,590 | | | 124,304 | | | 158,083 | | | — | | | 415,408 | | | 757,385 | | | 69,794 | | | 117,662 | | | 944,841 | |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
6. | Expenses by nature (continued) |
6. Expenses by nature (continued)
Expenses by nature for the year ended December 31, 2018:2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 5) | | General and
Administrative
Expenses | | Selling
Expenses | | Total |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugar,
Ethanol and
Energy | | Total | | | |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | 2,348 | | | 4,466 | | | 7,452 | | | — | | | 26,341 | | | 40,607 | | | 25,519 | | | 5,206 | | | 71,332 | |
| Raw materials and consumables | 448 | | | 3,072 | | | 14,486 | | | — | | | 8,743 | | | 26,749 | | | — | | | — | | | 26,749 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 2,929 | | | 2,016 | | | 2,812 | | | — | | | 93,211 | | | 100,968 | | | 12,490 | | | 985 | | | 114,443 | |
| Depreciation of right of use assets | — | | | 19 | | | 461 | | | — | | | 6,208 | | | 6,688 | | | 3,557 | | | 24 | | | 10,269 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fuel, lubricants and others | 131 | | | 68 | | | 2,030 | | | — | | | 16,543 | | | 18,772 | | | 428 | | | 187 | | | 19,387 | |
| Maintenance and repairs | 639 | | | 1,492 | | | 1,141 | | | — | | | 12,581 | | | 15,853 | | | 954 | | | 476 | | | 17,283 | |
| Freights | 172 | | | 4,617 | | | 1,708 | | | — | | | 649 | | | 7,146 | | | — | | | 33,111 | | | 40,257 | |
| Export taxes / selling taxes | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 35,966 | | | 35,966 | |
| Export expenses | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 8,801 | | | 8,801 | |
| Contractors and services | 1,358 | | | 116 | | | 54 | | | — | | | 5,086 | | | 6,614 | | | — | | | — | | | 6,614 | |
| Energy transmission | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,231 | | | 2,231 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Energy power | 803 | | | 1,015 | | | 1,879 | | | — | | | 764 | | | 4,461 | | | 137 | | | 114 | | | 4,712 | |
| Professional fees | 32 | | | 35 | | | 103 | | | — | | | 447 | | | 617 | | | 6,261 | | | 1,060 | | | 7,938 | |
| Other taxes | 20 | | | 76 | | | 97 | | | — | | | 2,312 | | | 2,505 | | | 376 | | | 21 | | | 2,902 | |
| Contingencies | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 703 | | | — | | | 703 | |
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | 111 | | | 182 | | | 137 | | | — | | | — | | | 430 | | | 283 | | | 226 | | | 939 | |
| Third parties raw materials | 3,257 | | | 6,578 | | | 42,051 | | | — | | | 13,547 | | | 65,433 | | | — | | | — | | | 65,433 | |
| Tax recoveries | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,087) | | | (1,087) | | | — | | | — | | | (1,087) | |
| Others | 524 | | | 1,219 | | | 1,975 | | | — | | | 1,613 | | | 5,331 | | | 2,720 | | | 6,650 | | | 14,701 | |
| Subtotal | 12,772 | | | 24,971 | | | 76,386 | | | — | | | 186,958 | | | 301,087 | | | 53,428 | | | 95,058 | | | 449,573 | |
| Own agricultural produce consumed | 31,302 | | | 54,536 | | | 26,547 | | | — | | | 98,669 | | | 211,054 | | | — | | | — | | | 211,054 | |
| Total | 44,074 | | | 79,507 | | | 102,933 | | | — | | | 285,627 | | | 512,141 | | | 53,428 | | | 95,058 | | | 660,627 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 5) | | General and Administrative Expenses | | Selling Expenses | | Total |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total | | | |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | — |
| | 5,055 |
| | 115 |
| | 36 |
| | 46,106 |
| | 51,312 |
| | 29,245 |
| | 5,908 |
| | 86,465 |
|
| Raw materials and consumables | 733 |
| | 4,391 |
| | 282 |
| | — |
| | 10,122 |
| | 15,528 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,528 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 1,764 |
| | 118 |
| | — |
| | 115,253 |
| | 117,135 |
| | 9,667 |
| | 767 |
| | 127,569 |
|
| Fuel, lubricants and others | — |
| | 117 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 26,267 |
| | 26,384 |
| | 614 |
| | 192 |
| | 27,190 |
|
| Maintenance and repairs | — |
| | 1,452 |
| | 30 |
| | — |
| | 19,715 |
| | 21,197 |
| | 1,573 |
| | 365 |
| | 23,135 |
|
| Freights | 47 |
| | 2,519 |
| | 436 |
| | — |
| | 685 |
| | 3,687 |
| | — |
| | 24,700 |
| | 28,387 |
|
| Export taxes / selling taxes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 42,074 |
| | 42,074 |
|
| Export expenses | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,774 |
| | 2,774 |
|
| Contractors and services | 2,885 |
| | 254 |
| | 1,279 |
| | — |
| | 7,901 |
| | 12,319 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,319 |
|
| Energy transmission | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,689 |
| | 2,689 |
|
| Energy power | — |
| | 1,239 |
| | 138 |
| | — |
| | 1,340 |
| | 2,717 |
| | 145 |
| | 57 |
| | 2,919 |
|
| Professional fees | — |
| | 52 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 484 |
| | 536 |
| | 7,781 |
| | 556 |
| | 8,873 |
|
| Other taxes | — |
| | 71 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,841 |
| | 1,912 |
| | 1,309 |
| | 10 |
| | 3,231 |
|
| Contingencies | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,345 |
| | — |
| | 1,345 |
|
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | — |
| | 276 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 279 |
| | 1,077 |
| | 53 |
| | 1,409 |
|
| Third parties raw materials | — |
| | 2,913 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,154 |
| | 16,067 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,067 |
|
| Others | 3 |
| | 1,697 |
| | 223 |
| | — |
| | 5,067 |
| | 6,990 |
| | 3,324 |
| | 10,070 |
| | 20,384 |
|
| Subtotal | 3,668 |
| | 21,800 |
| | 2,624 |
| | 36 |
| | 247,935 |
| | 276,063 |
| | 56,080 |
| | 90,215 |
| | 422,358 |
|
| Own agricultural produce consumed | 14,262 |
| | 39,800 |
| | 4,922 |
| | — |
| | 101,560 |
| | 160,544 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 160,544 |
|
| Total | 17,930 |
| | 61,600 |
| | 7,546 |
| | 36 |
| | 349,495 |
| | 436,607 |
| | 56,080 |
| | 90,215 |
| | 582,902 |
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
6. | Expenses by nature (continued) |
6. Expenses by nature (continued)
Expenses by nature for the year ended December 31, 2017:2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 5) | | | | | | |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugar,
Ethanol and
Energy | | Total | | General and
Administrative
Expenses | | Selling
Expenses | | Total |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | 1,880 | | | 4,738 | | | 4,412 | | | — | | | 39,768 | | | 50,798 | | | 27,492 | | | 6,211 | | | 84,501 | |
| Raw materials and consumables | 314 | | | 6,527 | | | 10,151 | | | — | | | 15,683 | | | 32,675 | | | — | | | — | | | 32,675 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 2,581 | | | 1,897 | | | 2,140 | | | — | | | 122,025 | | | 128,643 | | | 11,212 | | | 868 | | | 140,723 | |
| Depreciation right-of-use and other leases | — | | | 116 | | | 344 | | | — | | | 6,794 | | | 7,254 | | | 2,007 | | | 5 | | | 9,266 | |
| Fertilizers, agrochemicals and seeds | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Fuel, lubricants and others | 228 | | | 83 | | | 1,381 | | | — | | | 25,430 | | | 27,122 | | | 593 | | | 225 | | | 27,940 | |
| Maintenance and repairs | 290 | | | 1,120 | | | 985 | | | — | | | 19,694 | | | 22,089 | | | 1,755 | | | 534 | | | 24,378 | |
| Freights | 146 | | | 2,405 | | | 1,959 | | | — | | | 784 | | | 5,294 | | | — | | | 23,130 | | | 28,424 | |
| Export taxes / selling taxes | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 52,312 | | | 52,312 | |
| Export expenses | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,552 | | | 5,552 | |
| Contractors and services | 1,051 | | | 138 | | | 40 | | | — | | | 9,381 | | | 10,610 | | | — | | | — | | | 10,610 | |
| Energy transmission | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 88 | | | 3,057 | | | 3,145 | |
| Feeeding expenses | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Veterinary expenses | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Energy power | 725 | | | 1,298 | | | 1,659 | | | — | | | 1,181 | | | 4,863 | | | 145 | | | 145 | | | 5,153 | |
| Professional fees | 20 | | | 65 | | | 127 | | | — | | | 175 | | | 387 | | | 8,065 | | | 1,047 | | | 9,499 | |
| Other taxes | 1 | | | 74 | | | 81 | | | — | | | 1,241 | | | 1,397 | | | 1,089 | | | 28 | | | 2,514 | |
| Contingencies | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 459 | | | — | | | 459 | |
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | 83 | | | 171 | | | 78 | | | — | | | — | | | 332 | | | 831 | | | 125 | | | 1,288 | |
| Third parties raw materials | 7,136 | | | 5,629 | | | 18,131 | | | — | | | 11,243 | | | 42,139 | | | — | | | — | | | 42,139 | |
| Tax recoveries | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (396) | | | (396) | | | — | | | — | | | (396) | |
| Others | 431 | | | 695 | | | 681 | | | — | | | 2,324 | | | 4,131 | | | 3,466 | | | 13,733 | | | 21,330 | |
| Subtotal | 14,886 | | | 24,956 | | | 42,169 | | | — | | | 255,327 | | | 337,338 | | | 57,202 | | | 106,972 | | | 501,512 | |
| Own agricultural produce consumed | 19,066 | | | 41,430 | | | 26,682 | | | — | | | 99,637 | | | 186,815 | | | — | | | — | | | 186,815 | |
| Total | 33,952 | | | 66,386 | | | 68,851 | | | — | | | 354,964 | | | 524,153 | | | 57,202 | | | 106,972 | | | 688,327 | |
7. Salaries and social security expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Wages and salaries (i) | 101,818 | | | 89,662 | | | 104,400 | |
| Social security costs | 30,296 | | | 27,430 | | | 30,888 | |
| Equity-settled share-based compensation | 6,406 | | | 4,316 | | | 4,734 | |
| | 138,520 | | | 121,408 | | | 140,022 | |
| | | | | |
(i)Includes US$25,105, US$32,714 and US$32,636, capitalized in Property, Plant and Equipment for the years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost of production of manufactured products (Note 5) | | | | | | |
| | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total | | General and Administrative Expenses | | Selling Expenses | | Total |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | — |
| | 7,115 |
| | — |
| | 229 |
| | 50,243 |
| | 57,587 |
| | 33,969 |
| | 6,724 |
| | 98,280 |
|
| Raw materials and consumables | 695 |
| | 3,579 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,343 |
| | 13,617 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,617 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 836 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | 119,427 |
| | 120,271 |
| | 6,162 |
| | 778 |
| | 127,211 |
|
| Fuel, lubricants and others | — |
| | 109 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25,272 |
| | 25,381 |
| | 454 |
| | 242 |
| | 26,077 |
|
| Maintenance and repairs | — |
| | 1,750 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17,005 |
| | 18,755 |
| | 1,189 |
| | 469 |
| | 20,413 |
|
| Freights | — |
| | 6,074 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 572 |
| | 6,646 |
| | — |
| | 33,682 |
| | 40,328 |
|
| Export taxes / selling taxes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 36,808 |
| | 36,808 |
|
| Export expenses | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,511 |
| | 3,511 |
|
| Contractors and services | 1,054 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,191 |
| | 7,245 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,245 |
|
| Energy transmission | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,312 |
| | 3,312 |
|
| Energy power | — |
| | 1,342 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,525 |
| | 2,867 |
| | 190 |
| | 53 |
| | 3,110 |
|
| Professional fees | — |
| | 51 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 352 |
| | 403 |
| | 7,519 |
| | 1,633 |
| | 9,555 |
|
| Other taxes | — |
| | 93 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,978 |
| | 2,071 |
| | 845 |
| | 5 |
| | 2,921 |
|
| Contingencies | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,174 |
| | — |
| | 2,174 |
|
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | — |
| | 269 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 269 |
| | 1,334 |
| | 56 |
| | 1,659 |
|
| Third parties raw materials | — |
| | 6,808 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34,161 |
| | 40,969 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,969 |
|
| Others | 6 |
| | 955 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,261 |
| | 5,222 |
| | 3,463 |
| | 8,126 |
| | 16,811 |
|
| Subtotal | 1,755 |
| | 28,981 |
| | — |
| | 237 |
| | 270,330 |
| | 301,303 |
| | 57,299 |
| | 95,399 |
| | 454,001 |
|
| Own agricultural produce consumed | 3,810 |
| | 39,988 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 108,534 |
| | 152,332 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 152,332 |
|
| Total | 5,565 |
| | 68,969 |
| | — |
| | 237 |
| | 378,864 |
| | 453,635 |
| | 57,299 |
| | 95,399 |
| | 606,333 |
|
| |
7. | Salaries and social security expenses |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Wages and salaries (i) | 104,400 |
| | 105,931 |
| | 132,025 |
|
| Social security costs | 30,888 |
| | 29,865 |
| | 30,558 |
|
| Equity-settled share-based compensation | 4,734 |
| | 4,728 |
| | 5,552 |
|
| | 140,022 |
| | 140,524 |
| | 168,135 |
|
| |
(i) | Includes US$ 32,714, US$ 32,636 and US$ 41,172, capitalized in Property, Plant and Equipment for the years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
8. | 8. �� Other operating (expense) / income, net |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Gain from disposal of farmland and other assets (Note 22) | 1,354 |
| | 36,227 |
| | — |
|
| (Loss) / gain from commodity derivative financial instrument | (618 | ) | | 54,694 |
| | 40,842 |
|
| Loss from disposal of other property items | (329 | ) | | (95 | ) | | (986 | ) |
| Net (loss) / gain from fair value adjustment of investment property | (325 | ) | | 13,409 |
| | 4,302 |
|
| Losses related to energy business | — |
| | — |
| | (3,247 | ) |
| Others | (904 | ) | | (3 | ) | | 2,852 |
|
| | (822 | ) | | 104,232 |
| | 43,763 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Gain from disposal of farmland and other assets (Note 21) | — | | | 2,064 | | | 1,354 | |
| Loss from the sale of subsidiaries (Note 21) | 10 | | | (554) | | | — | |
| Loss from commodity derivative financial instrument | (15,990) | | | (8,320) | | | (618) | |
| | | | | |
| (Loss) / gain from disposal of other property items | (397) | | | 2,198 | | | (329) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Net (loss) / gain from fair value adjustment of investment property | (4,331) | | | 1,077 | | | (325) | |
| | | | | |
| Others | 1,940 | | | 5,522 | | | (904) | |
| | (18,768) | | | 1,987 | | | (822) | |
9. Financial results, net
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Finance income: | | | | | |
| - Interest income | 4,081 | | | 4,084 | | | 7,319 | |
| -Foreign exchange gains, net | 18,939 | | | — | | | — | |
| - Gain from interest rate/foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments | 512 | | | 92 | | | 1,189 | |
| - Other income | 13,138 | | | 21,878 | | | 1,400 | |
| Finance income | 36,670 | | | 26,054 | | | 9,908 | |
| | | | | |
| Finance costs: | | | | | |
| - Interest expense | (62,536) | | | (58,282) | | | (60,134) | |
| - Finance cost related to lease liabilities | (16,502) | | | (12,532) | | | (9,524) | |
| - Cash flow hedge – transfer from equity (Note 2) | (52,650) | | | (24,363) | | | (15,594) | |
| - Foreign exchange losses, net | — | | | (109,266) | | | (108,458) | |
| - Taxes | (7,073) | | | (4,559) | | | (4,364) | |
| | | | | |
| - Borrowings prepayment related expenses (Brazilian subsidiaries) | (3,068) | | | — | | | — | |
| -Finance discount | (3,741) | | | — | | | — | |
| - Other expenses | (6,111) | | | (4,774) | | | (4,492) | |
| Finance costs | (151,681) | | | (213,776) | | | (202,566) | |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 11,541 | | | 12,064 | | | 92,437 | |
| Total financial results, net | (103,470) | | | (175,658) | | | (100,221) | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Finance income: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| - Interest income | 7,319 |
| | 7,915 |
| | 11,230 |
|
| - Gain from interest rate/foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments | 1,189 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| - Other income | 1,400 |
| | 666 |
| | 514 |
|
| Finance income | 9,908 |
| | 8,581 |
| | 11,744 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Finance costs: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| - Interest expense | (60,134 | ) | | (51,577 | ) | | (52,308 | ) |
| - Finance cost related to lease liabilities | (9,524 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| - Cash flow hedge – transfer from equity (Note 2) | (15,594 | ) | | (26,693 | ) | | (20,758 | ) |
| - Foreign exchange losses, net | (108,458 | ) | | (183,195 | ) | | (38,708 | ) |
| - Taxes | (4,364 | ) | | (3,136 | ) | | (3,705 | ) |
| - Loss from interest rate/foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments | — |
| | (3,024 | ) | | (2,163 | ) |
| - Borrowings prepayment related expenses (Brazilian subsidiaries) | — |
| | — |
| | (10,847 | ) |
| - Other expenses | (4,492 | ) | | (3,638 | ) | | (2,860 | ) |
| Finance costs | (202,566 | ) | | (271,263 | ) | | (131,349 | ) |
| Other financial results - Net gain of inflation effects on the monetary items | 92,437 |
| | 81,928 |
| | — |
|
| Total financial results, net | (100,221 | ) | | (180,754 | ) | | (119,605 | ) |
Adecoagro is subject to the applicable general tax regulations in Luxembourg.
The Group’s income tax has been calculated on the estimated assessable taxable results for the year at the rates prevailing in the respective foreign tax jurisdictions. The subsidiaries of the Group are required to calculate their income taxes on a separate basis according to the rules and regulations of the jurisdictions where they operate. Therefore, the Group is not legally permitted to compensate subsidiaries’ losses against subsidiaries’ income. The details of the provision for the Group’s consolidated income tax are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Current income tax | 666 |
| | (2,846 | ) | | (13,425 | ) |
| Deferred income tax | (21,486 | ) | | 3,870 |
| | 18,417 |
|
| Income tax (expense) / benefit | (20,820 | ) | | 1,024 |
| | 4,992 |
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
10. Taxation (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Current income tax | (4,338) | | | (2,840) | | | 666 | |
| Deferred income tax | (39,499) | | | (9,485) | | | (21,486) | |
| Income tax expense | (43,837) | | | (12,325) | | | (20,820) | |
The statutory tax rate in the countries where the Group operates for all of the years presented are:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Tax Jurisdiction | | Income Tax Rate |
| Argentina (i) | | 30 | % |
| Brazil | | 34 | % |
| Uruguay | | 25 | % |
| Spain | | 25 | % |
| Luxembourg | | 24.94 | % |
(i) During 2017 and 2019, the Argentine Government introduced changes in the income tax. The income tax rate willwould be reduced to 30% for the years 2018 to 2020, and to 25% from 2021 onwards. A new tax on dividends iswas created with a rate of 7% for the years 2018 to 2020, and 13% from 2021 onwards. Considering 2018 resultedIn June, 2021, the Argentine Government introduced new changes in losses for Argentine subsidiaries, no deferredthe income tax, liability was recognizedestablishing increasing rates, which starts in 25% and reach 35% for futureincome tax gains over Pesos 50 million (0.5 million USD). Also it establishes this new scheme is applicable for the year 2021 onwards. It also establishes a 7% withholding tax onfor dividends.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities of the Group as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, without taking into consideration the offsetting of balances within the same tax jurisdiction, will be recovered or settled as follows:
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Deferred income tax asset to be recovered after more than 12 months | 108,294 |
| | 73,805 |
| Deferred income tax asset to be recovered after more than 12 months | 102,374 | | | 105,424 | |
| Deferred income tax asset to be recovered within 12 months | 35,973 |
| | 62,626 |
| Deferred income tax asset to be recovered within 12 months | 21,976 | | | 23,744 | |
| Deferred income tax assets | 144,267 |
| | 136,431 |
| Deferred income tax assets | 124,350 | | | 129,168 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Deferred income tax liability to be settled after more than 12 months | (292,871 | ) | | (286,738 | ) | Deferred income tax liability to be settled after more than 12 months | (362,114) | | | (278,035) | |
| Deferred income tax liability to be settled within 12 months | (3,240 | ) | | (1,673 | ) | Deferred income tax liability to be settled within 12 months | (17,763) | | | (13,689) | |
| Deferred income tax liability | (296,111 | ) | | (288,411 | ) | Deferred income tax liability | (379,877) | | | (291,724) | |
| Deferred income tax liability / assets, net | (151,844 | ) | | (151,980 | ) | |
| Deferred income tax liability, net | | Deferred income tax liability, net | (255,527) | | | (162,556) | |
The gross movement on the deferred income tax account is as follows:
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Beginning of year | (151,980 | ) | | 20,351 |
| Beginning of year | (162,556) | | | (151,844) | |
| Tax effect on the opening net book amount for the application of IAS 29 | — |
| | (64,208 | ) | |
| Exchange differences | 4,877 |
| | 16,878 |
| Exchange differences | (40,644) | | | 1,536 | |
| Effect of adoption of fair value valuation for farmlands | 10,480 |
| | (139,223 | ) | |
| Acquisition of subsidiary | (3,515 | ) | | — |
| |
| Changes of fair value valuation for farmlands | | Changes of fair value valuation for farmlands | (9,953) | | | (11,790) | |
| | Disposal of subsidiary | 3,730 |
| | — |
| Disposal of subsidiary | — | | | 3,458 | |
| Others | (705 | ) | | (970 | ) | Others | (349) | | | (159) | |
| Tax credit relating to cash flow hedge (i) | 6,755 |
| | 11,322 |
| Tax credit relating to cash flow hedge (i) | (2,526) | | | 5,728 | |
| Income tax benefit (expense) / benefit | (21,486 | ) | | 3,870 |
| |
| Income tax benefit expense | | Income tax benefit expense | (39,499) | | | (9,485) | |
| End of year | (151,844 | ) | | (151,980 | ) | End of year | (255,527) | | | (162,556) | |
(i) Relates to the gain or loss before income tax of cash flow hedge recognized in other comprehensive income amounting to US$ 75,822 for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018: US$ (565)); net of the reclassification from Equity to the Income Statement of US$ (32,305) for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018: US$ (20,758))
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
10. Taxation (continued)
(i) Relates to the gain or loss before income tax of cash flow hedge recognized in other comprehensive income amounting to US$46,145 for the year ended December 31, 2021 (2020: US$75,822); net of the reclassification from Equity to the Income Statement of US$ (26,031) for the year ended December 31, 2021 (2020: US$ (32,305))
The movement in the deferred income tax assets and liabilities during the year, without taking into consideration the offsetting of balances within the same tax jurisdiction, is as follows:
| Deferred income tax
liabilities | | Deferred income tax
liabilities | | Property,
plant and
equipment | | Investment property | | Biological
assets | | Others | | Total |
| At January 1, 2020 | | At January 1, 2020 | | 280,859 | | | 11,907 | | | 4,179 | | | (834) | | | 296,111 | |
| Charged / (credited) to the statement of income | | Charged / (credited) to the statement of income | | 11,581 | | | (1,928) | | | 6,463 | | | — | | | 16,116 | |
| | Deferred income tax liabilities | | Property, plant and equipment | | Investment property | | Biological assets | | Others | | Total | |
| At January 1, 2018 | | 65,806 |
| | 12,629 |
| | 16,772 |
| | 2,625 |
| | 97,832 |
| |
| Charged / (credited) to the statement of income | | 31,237 |
| | 2,730 |
| | (10,438 | ) | | (1,088 | ) | | 22,441 |
| |
| Tax effect on the opening net book amount for the application of IAS 29 | | 63,357 |
| | — |
| | 164 |
| | — |
| | 63,521 |
| |
| Effect of adoption of fair value valuation for farmlands | | 139,223 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 139,223 |
| |
| Exchange differences | | (29,040 | ) | | (3,405 | ) | | (3,032 | ) | | 871 |
| | (34,606 | ) | |
| At December 31, 2018 | | 270,583 |
| | 11,954 |
| | 3,466 |
| | 2,408 |
| | 288,411 |
| |
| Charged / (credited) to the statement of income | | 31,745 |
| | 331 |
| | 912 |
| | (1,939 | ) | | 31,049 |
| |
| Acquisition of subsidiary | | 3,603 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,603 |
| |
| | Farmlands revaluation | | (10,480 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10,480 | ) | Farmlands revaluation | | 11,521 | | | 269 | | | — | | | — | | | 11,790 | |
| Disposals of subsidiaries | | (3,730 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,730 | ) | Disposals of subsidiaries | | (3,513) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,513) | |
| Exchange differences | | (10,862 | ) | | (378 | ) | | (199 | ) | | (1,303 | ) | | (12,742 | ) | Exchange differences | | (28,920) | | | (370) | | | 510 | | | — | | | (28,780) | |
| At December 31, 2019 | | 280,859 |
| | 11,907 |
| | 4,179 |
| | (834 | ) | | 296,111 |
| |
| At December 31, 2020 | | At December 31, 2020 | | 271,528 | | | 9,878 | | | 11,152 | | | (834) | | | 291,724 | |
| Charged / (credited) to the statement of income | | Charged / (credited) to the statement of income | | 43,270 | | | (817) | | | (755) | | | (1,811) | | | 39,887 | |
| Farmlands revaluation | | Farmlands revaluation | | 11,469 | | | (1,516) | | | — | | | — | | | 9,953 | |
| Disposals of subsidiaries | | Disposals of subsidiaries | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Exchange differences | | Exchange differences | | 32,167 | | | 2,336 | | | 1,797 | | | 2,013 | | | 38,313 | |
| At December 31, 2021 | | At December 31, 2021 | | 358,434 | | | 9,881 | | | 12,194 | | | (632) | | | 379,877 | |
| | Deferred income tax assets | | Provisions | | Tax loss carry forwards | | Equity-settled share-based compensation | | Biological assets | | Others | | Total | Deferred income tax
assets | | Provisions | | Tax loss
carry
forwards | | Equity-settled
share-based
compensation | | Borrowings | | Biological
assets | | Others | | Total |
| At January 1, 2018 | | 2,483 |
| | 96,117 |
| | 5,681 |
| | — |
| | 13,902 |
| | 118,183 |
| |
| At January 1, 2020 | | At January 1, 2020 | | 3,237 | | | 91,419 | | | 3,383 | | | 1,548 | | | 4,508 | | | 40,172 | | | 144,267 | |
| Charged / (credited) to the statement of income | | 2,003 |
| | (10,798 | ) | | (379 | ) | | 4,572 |
| | 30,913 |
| | 26,311 |
| Charged / (credited) to the statement of income | | 4,941 | | | (5,843) | | | (835) | | | 34,017 | | | (4,508) | | | (21,141) | | | 6,631 | |
| Tax effect on the opening net book amount for the application of IAS 29 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (687 | ) | | (687 | ) | |
| Others | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (970 | ) | | (970 | ) | |
| Tax charge relating to cash flow hedge | | — |
| | 11,322 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,322 |
| |
| Exchange differences | | (526 | ) | | (16,421 | ) | | — |
| | 22 |
| | (803 | ) | | (17,728 | ) | |
| At December 31, 2018 | | 3,960 |
|
| 80,220 |
|
| 5,302 |
|
| 4,594 |
|
| 42,355 |
|
| 136,431 |
| |
| (Credited) / charged to the statement of income | | (604 | ) | | 11,080 |
| | (1,568 | ) | | (117 | ) | | 772 |
| | 9,563 |
| |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | | 7 |
| | 134 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (53 | ) | | 88 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (55) | | | (55) | |
| Others | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (705 | ) | | (705 | ) | Others | | — | | | — | | | (60) | | | — | | | — | | | (99) | | | (159) | |
| Tax charge relating to cash flow hedge | | — |
| | 6,755 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,755 |
| Tax charge relating to cash flow hedge | | — | | | 5,728 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,728 | |
| Exchange differences | | (126 | ) | | (3,707 | ) | | (1,161 | ) | | 31 |
| | (2,902 | ) | | (7,865 | ) | Exchange differences | | (1,152) | | | (20,363) | | | — | | | (9,460) | | | — | | | 3,731 | | | (27,244) | |
| At December 31, 2019 | | 3,237 |
| | 94,482 |
| | 2,573 |
| | 4,508 |
| | 39,467 |
| | 144,267 |
| |
| At December 31, 2020 | | At December 31, 2020 | | 7,026 | | | 70,941 | | | 2,488 | | | 26,105 | | | — | | | 22,608 | | | 129,168 | |
| (Credited) / charged to the statement of income | | (Credited) / charged to the statement of income | | 1,978 | | | 13,108 | | | — | | | (13,589) | | | 452 | | | (1,561) | | | 388 | |
| | Others | | Others | | — | | | — | | | (349) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (349) | |
| Tax charge relating to cash flow hedge | | Tax charge relating to cash flow hedge | | — | | | (2,526) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,526) | |
| Exchange differences | | Exchange differences | | 20 | | | 3,158 | | | — | | | (2,952) | | | (386) | | | (2,171) | | | (2,331) | |
| At December 31, 2021 | | At December 31, 2021 | | 9,024 | | | 84,681 | | | 2,139 | | | 9,564 | | | 66 | | | 18,876 | | | 124,350 | |
Tax loss carry forwards in Argentina and Uruguay generally expire within 5 years. Tax loss carry forwards in Brazil and Luxembourg do not expire. However, in Brazil, the taxable profit for each year can only be reduced by tax loss carry forward up to a maximum of 30%.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
10. Taxation (continued)
In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset, the Group will need to generate future taxable income in the countries where the tax loss carry forward were incurred. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes that as at December 31, 2019,2021, it is probable that the Group will realize some portion of the deferred tax assets in Brazil and Argentina.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Group’s tax loss carry forwards and their corresponding jurisdictions are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Jurisdiction | | Tax loss carry forward | | Expiration period |
| Argentina (1) | | 136,205119,385 |
| | 5 years |
| Brazil | | 169,209114,479 |
| | No expiration date. |
| Uruguay | | 4,3712,458 |
| | 5 years |
| Luxembourg | | 29,83428,263 |
| | No expiration date. |
(1) As of December 31, 2019,2021, the aging of the determination tax loss carry forward in Argentina is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| Year of generation | | Amount |
| | |
| | |
| 2018 | | 20,543 | |
| 2019 | | 82,262 | |
| 2020 | | 16,580 | |
|
| | | |
| Year of generation | | Amount |
| 2015 | | 11,359 |
|
| 2016 | | 3,138 |
|
| 2017 | | 12,627 |
|
| 2018 | | 30,383 |
|
| 2019 | | 78,698 |
|
Deferred income tax assets are recognized for tax loss carry-forwards to the extent that the realization of the related tax benefit through future taxable profits is probable. The Group did not recognize deferred income tax assets of US$ 4.9 million as of December 31, 2018, in respect of losses amounting to US$ 19.5 million that can be carried forward against future taxable income.
The tax on the Group’s profit before income tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax raterates applicable to profits ofin the consolidated entitiesrespective countries as follows:
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Tax calculated at the tax rates applicable to profits in the respective countries | (7,250 | ) | | 2,956 |
| | (3,013 | ) | Tax calculated at the tax rates applicable to profits in the respective countries | (54,291) | | | (4,184) | | | (7,250) | |
| Non-deductible items | (1,511 | ) | | (2,249 | ) | | (1,406 | ) | Non-deductible items | (3,459) | | | (7,642) | | | (1,511) | |
| Effect of the changes in the statutory income tax rate in Argentina | 3,115 |
| | (1,013 | ) | | 1,781 |
| Effect of the changes in the statutory income tax rate in Argentina | (31,962) | | | 6,324 | | | 3,115 | |
| Unused tax losses | (3,742 | ) | | (4,181 | ) | | (2,265 | ) | Unused tax losses | 482 | | | (710) | | | (3,742) | |
| Tax losses where no deferred tax asset was recognized | 1,910 |
| | (2,368 | ) | | (29 | ) | |
| | Non-taxable income | 11,545 |
| | 13,069 |
| | 2,437 |
| Non-taxable income | 13,604 | | | 11,060 | | | 11,545 | |
| Previously unrecognized tax losses now recouped to reduce tax expenses | — |
| | — |
| | 7,595 |
| |
| Effect of IAS 29 on Argentina´s Shareholder´s equity and deferred income tax | (23,805 | ) | | (5,825 | ) | | — |
| |
| Previously unrecognized tax losses now recouped to reduce tax expenses (1) | | Previously unrecognized tax losses now recouped to reduce tax expenses (1) | 38,121 | | | 1,529 | | | 1,910 | |
| | Effect of IAS 29 and tax adjustment per inflation in Argentina | | Effect of IAS 29 and tax adjustment per inflation in Argentina | (6,402) | | | (19,239) | | | (23,805) | |
| Others | (1,082 | ) | | 635 |
| | (108 | ) | Others | 70 | | | 537 | | | (1,082) | |
| Income tax (expense) / benefit | (20,820 | ) | | 1,024 |
| | 4,992 |
| |
| Income tax expense | | Income tax expense | (43,837) | | | (12,325) | | | (20,820) | |
(1) 2021 includes 37,175 of adjustment by inflation of tax loss carryforwards in Argentina.
Tax Inflation Adjustment in Argentina
Laws 27,430, 27,468 and 27,541 introduced several amendments to the income tax inflation adjustments provided by the Income Tax Law. According to these provisions, and effective as from fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, the inflation adjustment procedure set out in Title VI of the Income Tax Law shall be applicable in fiscal years in which the variation of IPC price index, accumulated in the 36 months immediately preceding the end of the relevant fiscal year, is higher than 100%. As from its effectiveness, this procedure is applicable because the variation of the IPC reached the prescribed limits.
However, Section 39 of Law No. 24,073 suspended the application of the provisions of Title VI of the Income Tax Law relating to the income tax inflation adjustment since April 1, 1992 to certain items, such as, fixed assets, inventory, and tax loss carryforwards, among others.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
10. Taxation (continued)
After the economic crisis of 2002, many taxpayers began to question the legality of the provisions suspending the income tax inflation adjustment. Also, the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice issued its verdict in the "Candy" case July 3, 2009 in which it stated that particularly for fiscal year 2002 and considering the serious state of disturbance of that year, the taxpayer could demonstrate that not applying the income tax inflation adjustment resulted in confiscatory income tax rates.
More recently, the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice applied a similar criterion to the 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014 fiscal years in the cases brought by “Distribuidora Gas del Centro” (10/14/14, 06/02/15, 10/04/16 and 06/25/19), among others, enabling the application of income tax inflation adjustment for periods not affected by a severe economic crisis such as 2002.
The Company believes that the lack of application of the income tax inflation adjustment is confiscatory. Accordingly, based on the precedents and the opinion of external and internal tax advisors, the Company has adjusted all items for inflation including those suspended by Section 39 of Law 24, 073 as described above. The net effect of the inflation adjustment resulted in a deferred tax asset of US$37.2 million.
The application of local tax laws require interpretation, and accordingly involves the application of judgement and is open to challenge by the relevant tax authorities. This gives rise to a level of uncertainty. Provisions for uncertain tax positions are established in accordance with IFRIC 23 based on an assessment of the range of likely tax outcomes in open years and reflecting the strength of technical arguments. Amounts are provided for individual tax uncertainties based on management’s assessment of whether the most likely amount or an expected amount based on a probability weighted methodology is the more appropriate predicter of amounts that the Company is ultimately expected to settle. When making this assessment, the Company utilizes specialist in-house tax knowledge and experience and takes into consideration specialist tax advice from third party advisers on specific items. The Company has not provided any amount in this case based on its belief that it has solid arguments to support its position.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
11. Earnings per share
(a) Basic
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Group by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the period excluding ordinary shares held as treasury shares (Note 24)23).
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Loss) / Profit from operations attributable to equity holders of the Group | (772 | ) | | (24,622 | ) | | 13,198 |
|
| Weighted average number of shares in issue (thousands) | 117,252 |
| | 116,637 |
| | 120,599 |
|
| Basic (loss) / earnings per share from operations | (0.007 | ) | | (0.211 | ) | | 0.109 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Profit / (loss) from operations attributable to equity holders of the Group | 130,669 | | | 412 | | | (772) | |
| Weighted average number of shares in issue (thousands) | 115,148 | | | 117,453 | | | 117,252 | |
| Basic earnings / (loss) per share from operations | 1.135 | | | 0.003 | | | (0.007) | |
(b) Diluted
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares. The Group has two2 categories of dilutive potential shares: equity-settled share options and restricted units. For these instruments, a calculation is done to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value, based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to outstanding share options. The number of shares calculated as above is compared with the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the equity-settled share options. As of December 31, 2019,2021, there were 737466 thousands (2018: 851(2020: 261 thousands; 2017: 1,6582019: 645 thousands) share options/restricted units outstanding that could potentially have a dilutive impact in the future but were antidilutive for the periods presented.
| | | | | | | | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | |
| (Loss) / Profit from operations attributable to equity holders of the Group | (772 | ) | | (24,622 | ) | | 13,198 |
| |
| Profit / (loss) from operations attributable to equity holders of the Group | | Profit / (loss) from operations attributable to equity holders of the Group | 130,669 | | | 412 | | | (772) | |
| Weighted average number of shares in issue (thousands) | 117,252 |
| | 116,637 |
| | 120,599 |
| Weighted average number of shares in issue (thousands) | 115,148 | | | 117,453 | | | 117,252 | |
| Adjustments for: | | | | | | Adjustments for: | |
| - Employee share options and restricted units (thousands) | 645 |
| | 1,198 |
| | 1,604 |
| - Employee share options and restricted units (thousands) | 466 | | | 261 | | | 645 | |
| Weighted average number of shares for diluted earnings per share (thousands) | 117,897 |
| | 117,835 |
| | 122,203 |
| Weighted average number of shares for diluted earnings per share (thousands) | 115,614 | | | 117,714 | | | 117,897 | |
| Diluted (loss) / earnings per share from operations | (0.007 | ) | | (0.211 | ) | | 0.108 |
| |
| Diluted earnings / (loss) per share from operations | | Diluted earnings / (loss) per share from operations | 1.130 | | | 0.003 | | | (0.007) | |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
12. Property, plant and equipment
| |
12. | Property, plant and equipment |
Changes in the Group’s property, plant and equipment in 20192021 and 20182020 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Farmlands | | Farmland
improvements | | Buildings and
facilities | | Machinery,
equipment,
furniture and
fittings | | Bearer plants | | Others | | Work in
progress | | Total |
| At January 1, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value for farmlands / Cost | 709,585 | | | 44,887 | | | 413,727 | | | 791,024 | | | 573,060 | | | 23,907 | | | 59,158 | | | 2,615,348 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | — | | | (19,607) | | | (181,007) | | | (584,751) | | | (319,540) | | | (17,223) | | | — | | | (1,122,128) | |
| Net book amount | 709,585 | | | 25,280 | | | 232,720 | | | 206,273 | | | 253,520 | | | 6,684 | | | 59,158 | | | 1,493,220 | |
| At December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Opening net book amount | 709,585 | | | 25,280 | | | 232,720 | | | 206,273 | | | 253,520 | | | 6,684 | | | 59,158 | | | 1,493,220 | |
| Exchange differences | (36,422) | | | (432) | | | (55,368) | | | (112,657) | | | 30,864 | | | (617) | | | (6,445) | | | (181,077) | |
| Additions | — | | | — | | | 11,279 | | | 52,350 | | | 72,592 | | | 1,877 | | | 31,192 | | | 169,290 | |
| Revaluation surplus | 41,490 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 41,490 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reclassification from investment property | 3,127 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,127 | |
| Transfers | — | | | (177) | | | 10,101 | | | 16,182 | | | — | | | 59 | | | (26,165) | | | — | |
| Disposals | (10,118) | | | — | | | (73) | | | (3,092) | | | — | | | (37) | | | — | | | (13,320) | |
| Disposals of subsidiaries | (13,496) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (13,496) | |
| Reclassification to non-income tax credits (*) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (363) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (363) | |
| Depreciation | — | | | (3,086) | | | (21,055) | | | (62,788) | | | (52,147) | | | (1,503) | | | — | | | (140,579) | |
| Closing net book amount | 694,166 | | | 21,585 | | | 177,604 | | | 95,905 | | | 304,829 | | | 6,463 | | | 57,740 | | | 1,358,292 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Farmlands | | Farmland improvements | | Buildings and facilities | | Machinery, equipment, furniture and fittings | | Bearer plants | | Others | | Work in progress | | Total |
| At January 1, 2018 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cost | 110,743 |
| | 22,399 |
| | 329,366 |
| | 696,266 |
| | 421,855 |
| | 16,999 |
| | 29,635 |
| | 1,627,263 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation | — |
| | (13,392 | ) | | (136,522 | ) | | (450,186 | ) | | (182,945 | ) | | (12,841 | ) | | — |
| | (795,886 | ) |
| Net book amount | 110,743 |
| | 9,007 |
| | 192,844 |
| | 246,080 |
| | 238,910 |
| | 4,158 |
| | 29,635 |
| | 831,377 |
|
| At December 31, 2018 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Opening net book amount | 110,743 |
| | 9,007 |
| | 192,844 |
| | 246,080 |
| | 238,910 |
| | 4,158 |
| | 29,635 |
| | 831,377 |
|
| Adjustment of opening net book amount for the application of IAS 29 | 211,328 |
| | 11,520 |
| | 22,563 |
| | 5,181 |
| | — |
| | 1,140 |
| | 856 |
| | 252,588 |
|
| Exchange differences | (78,858 | ) | | (3,310 | ) | | (34,195 | ) | | (49,222 | ) | | (36,504 | ) | | 1,410 |
| | (6,408 | ) | | (207,087 | ) |
| Additions | — |
| | 97 |
| | 13,773 |
| | 50,759 |
| | 96,365 |
| | 2,098 |
| | 61,829 |
| | 224,921 |
|
| Revaluation surplus | 545,129 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 545,129 |
|
| Reclassification from investment property | 3,313 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,313 |
|
| Transfers | — |
| | 2,012 |
| | 14,264 |
| | 18,577 |
| | — |
| | 49 |
| | (34,902 | ) | | — |
|
| Disposals | — |
| | — |
| | (149 | ) | | (2,144 | ) | | — |
| | (85 | ) | | (67 | ) | | (2,445 | ) |
| Disposals of subsidiaries | (11,471 | ) | | — |
| | (593 | ) | | (17 | ) | | (1,667 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (13,748 | ) |
| Reclassification to non-income tax credits (*) | — |
| | — |
| | (114 | ) | | (422 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (39 | ) | | (575 | ) |
| Depreciation | — |
| | (3,002 | ) | | (19,771 | ) | | (63,644 | ) | | (64,148 | ) | | (2,469 | ) | | — |
| | (153,034 | ) |
| Closing net book amount | 780,184 |
| | 16,324 |
| | 188,622 |
| | 205,148 |
| | 232,956 |
| | 6,301 |
| | 50,904 |
| | 1,480,439 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Farmlands | | Farmland
improvements | | Buildings and
facilities | | Machinery,
equipment,
furniture and
fittings | | Bearer plants | | Others | | Work in
progress | | Total |
| At December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value for farmlands / Cost | 694,166 | | | 44,278 | | | 379,666 | | | 743,444 | | | 676,516 | | | 25,189 | | | 57,740 | | | 2,620,999 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | — | | | (22,693) | | | (202,062) | | | (647,539) | | | (371,687) | | | (18,726) | | | — | | | (1,262,707) | |
| Net book amount | 694,166 | | | 21,585 | | | 177,604 | | | 95,905 | | | 304,829 | | | 6,463 | | | 57,740 | | | 1,358,292 | |
| Year ended December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Opening net book amount | 694,166 | | | 21,585 | | | 177,604 | | | 95,905 | | | 304,829 | | | 6,463 | | | 57,740 | | | 1,358,292 | |
| Exchange differences | 142,390 | | | 2,772 | | | 20,923 | | | (4,804) | | | (34,433) | | | 20,567 | | | 9,299 | | | 156,714 | |
| Additions | — | | | 169 | | | 11,681 | | | 55,463 | | | 88,530 | | | 2,615 | | | 46,371 | | | 204,829 | |
| Revaluation surplus | (126,675) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (126,675) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reclassification from investment property | 1,380 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,380 | |
| Transfers | — | | | (4,773) | | | 23,049 | | | 13,471 | | | 149 | | | 104 | | | (32,000) | | | — | |
| Disposals | — | | | (8) | | | (126) | | | (4,078) | | | — | | | (63) | | | (42) | | | (4,317) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reclassification to non-income tax credits (*) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (303) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (303) | |
| Depreciation | — | | | (3,166) | | | (25,452) | | | (72,471) | | | (64,093) | | | (2,115) | | | — | | | (167,297) | |
| Closing net book amount | 711,261 | | | 16,579 | | | 207,679 | | | 83,183 | | | 294,982 | | | 27,571 | | | 81,368 | | | 1,422,623 | |
| At December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value for farmlands / Cost | 711,261 | | | 42,438 | | | 435,193 | | | 803,193 | | | 730,762 | | | 48,412 | | | 81,368 | | | 2,852,627 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | — | | | (25,859) | | | (227,514) | | | (720,010) | | | (435,780) | | | (20,841) | | | — | | | (1,430,004) | |
| Net book amount | 711,261 | | | 16,579 | | | 207,679 | | | 83,183 | | | 294,982 | | | 27,571 | | | 81,368 | | | 1,422,623 | |
(*) Brazilian federal tax law allows entities to take a percentage of the total cost of the assets purchased as a tax credit. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de Serviços) tax credits were reclassified to trade and other receivables.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
12. | Property, plant and equipment (continued) |
12. Property, plant and equipment (continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Farmlands | | Farmland improvements | | Buildings and facilities | | Machinery, equipment, furniture and fittings | | Bearer plants | | Others | | Work in progress | | Total |
| At December 31, 2018 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Fair value for farmlands / Cost | 780,184 |
| | 32,718 |
| | 344,915 |
| | 718,978 |
| | 480,049 |
| | 21,611 |
| | 50,904 |
| | 2,429,359 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation | — |
| | (16,394 | ) | | (156,293 | ) | | (513,830 | ) | | (247,093 | ) | | (15,310 | ) | | — |
| | (948,920 | ) |
| Net book amount | 780,184 |
| | 16,324 |
| | 188,622 |
| | 205,148 |
| | 232,956 |
| | 6,301 |
| | 50,904 |
| | 1,480,439 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Opening net book amount | 780,184 |
| | 16,324 |
| | 188,622 |
| | 205,148 |
| | 232,956 |
| | 6,301 |
| | 50,904 |
| | 1,480,439 |
|
| Exchange differences | (25,205 | ) | | (536 | ) | | (6,846 | ) | | (8,770 | ) | | (9,802 | ) | | (207 | ) | | (3,170 | ) | | (54,536 | ) |
| Additions | 1,738 |
| | 62 |
| | 38,570 |
| | 62,320 |
| | 102,813 |
| | 2,160 |
| | 54,488 |
| | 262,151 |
|
| Revaluation surplus | (42,384 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (42,384 | ) |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 815 |
| | — |
| | 24,126 |
| | 5,280 |
| | — |
| | 437 |
| | — |
| | 30,658 |
|
| Reclassification from investment property | 4,816 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,816 |
|
| Transfers | — |
| | 12,643 |
| | 13,614 |
| | 16,772 |
| | — |
| | 35 |
| | (43,064 | ) | | — |
|
| Disposals | — |
| | — |
| | (81 | ) | | (3,308 | ) | | — |
| | (129 | ) | | — |
| | (3,518 | ) |
| Disposals of subsidiaries | (10,379 | ) | | — |
| | (571 | ) | | (22 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10,972 | ) |
| Reclassification to non-income tax credits (*) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (226 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (226 | ) |
| Depreciation | — |
| | (3,213 | ) | | (24,714 | ) | | (70,921 | ) | | (72,447 | ) | | (1,913 | ) | | — |
| | (173,208 | ) |
| Closing net book amount | 709,585 |
| | 25,280 |
| | 232,720 |
| | 206,273 |
| | 253,520 |
| | 6,684 |
| | 59,158 |
| | 1,493,220 |
|
| At December 31, 2019 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Fair value for farmlands / Cost | 709,585 |
| | 44,887 |
| | 413,727 |
| | 791,024 |
| | 573,060 |
| | 23,907 |
| | 59,158 |
| | 2,615,348 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation | — |
| | (19,607 | ) | | (181,007 | ) | | (584,751 | ) | | (319,540 | ) | | (17,223 | ) | | — |
| | (1,122,128 | ) |
| Net book amount | 709,585 |
| | 25,280 |
| | 232,720 |
| | 206,273 |
| | 253,520 |
| | 6,684 |
| | 59,158 |
| | 1,493,220 |
|
(*) Brazilian federal tax law allows entities to take a percentage of the total cost of the assets purchased as a tax credit. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, ICMS (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de Serviços) tax credits were reclassified to trade and other receivables.
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method to allocatedallocate their cost over the estimated usefull lives. Farmlands are not depreciated.
|
| | | | |
| Farmland improvements | 5-25 years |
| Buildings and facilities | 20 years |
| Furniture and fittings | 10 years |
| Computer equipment | 3-5 years |
| Machinery and equipment | 4-10 years |
| Vehicles | 4-5 years |
| Bearer plants | 6 years - based on productivity |
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each statement of financial position date.
Farmlands are measured at Fair Value.fair value. For all farmlands with a total valuation of US$ 710711 million as of December 31, 2019,2021, the valuation was determined using sales Comparison Approach prepared by an independent expert. Sale prices of comparable properties are adjusted considering the specific aspects of each property, the most relevant premise being the price per hectare (Level 3).The Group estimated that, other factors being constant, a 10% reduction on the Salessales price for the period ended December 31, 20192021 would have reduced the value of the farmlands on US$71 million (2020: US$69 million), which would impact, net of its tax effect on the "Revaluation surplus" item in the statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity. If farmlands were stated on the historical cost basis, the amount as of December 31, 20192020 would be US$ 235194 million.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
12. | Property, plant and equipment (continued) |
Depreciation charges are included in “Cost of production of Biological Assets”,Assets," “Cost of production of manufactures products”, “Generalproducts,”“General and administrative expenses”, “Sellingexpenses,”“Selling expenses” and capitalized in “Property, plant and equipment” for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020.
During the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, borrowing costs of US$ 13,904 (2018:2,831 (2020:US$ 3,660)3,861) were capitalized as components of the cost of acquisition or construction for qualifying assets.
Certain of the Group’s assets have been pledged as collateral to secure the Group’s borrowings and other payables. The net book value of the pledged assets amounts to US$ 324,129124,554 as of December 31, 2019 (2018:2021 (2020: US$ 265,099)451,904).
13. Right of use assets
Changes in the Group’s right of use assets in 2019 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Agricultural partnerships | | Others | | Total |
| | |
| At January 1, 2019 | | | | | |
| Adoption of IFRS 16 | 194,763 |
| | 10,174 |
| | 204,937 |
|
| Exchange differences | 1,582 |
| | (14,364 | ) | | (12,782 | ) |
| Additions and re-measurement | 60,770 |
| | 30,296 |
| | 91,066 |
|
| Depreciation | (37,278 | ) | | (7,890 | ) | | (45,168 | ) |
| Closing net book amount | 219,837 |
| | 18,216 |
| | 238,053 |
|
Since January 1,2019, the Company mandatorily adopted IFRS 16, (Note 35.1). Agricultural partnership has an average of 6 years duration.
As of December 31, 2019 included within Right of use assets balances are US$ 706 related to the net book value of assets under finance leases.
Depreciation charges are included in “Cost of production of Biological Assets”, “Cost of production of manufactures products”, “General and administrative expenses”, “Selling expenses” and capitalized in “Property, plant and equipment” for the year ended December 31, 2019.
14. Investment property
Changes in the Group’s investment property in 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Beginning of the year | 40,725 |
| | 42,342 |
|
| Net (loss) / gain from fair value adjustment (Note 8) | (325 | ) | | 13,409 |
|
| Reclassification to property, plant and equipment (i) | (4,816 | ) | | (3,313 | ) |
| Exchange difference | (1,289 | ) | | (11,713 | ) |
| End of the year | 34,295 |
| | 40,725 |
|
| Fair value | 34,295 |
| | 40,725 |
|
| Net book amount | 34,295 |
| | 40,725 |
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
14. | Investment property (continued) |
13. Right of use assets
Changes in the Group’s right of use assets in 2021 and 2020 were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Agricultural partnerships (*) | | Others | | Total |
| |
| At January 1, 2020 | | | | | |
| Opening net book amount | 219,837 | | | 18,216 | | | 238,053 | |
| Exchange differences | (47,186) | | | (3,969) | | | (51,155) | |
| Additions and re-measurements | 53,149 | | | 10,467 | | | 63,616 | |
| | | | | |
| Depreciation | (33,530) | | | (7,290) | | | (40,820) | |
| Closing net book amount | 192,270 | | | 17,424 | | | 209,694 | |
| | | | | |
| At December 31, 2021 | | | | | |
| Opening net book amount | 192,270 | | | 17,424 | | | 209,694 | |
| Exchange differences | (10,191) | | | (55) | | | (10,246) | |
| Additions and re-measurements | 95,030 | | | 15,497 | | | 110,527 | |
| Depreciation | (41,138) | | | (8,061) | | | (49,199) | |
| Closing net book amount | 235,971 | | | 24,805 | | | 260,776 | |
(*) Agricultural partnership has an average of 6 years duration.
Depreciation charges are included in “Cost of production of Biological Assets,”“Cost of production of manufactures products,”“General and administrative expenses,”“Selling expenses” and capitalized in “Property, plant and equipment” for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
14. Investment property
Changes in the Group’s investment property in 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Beginning of the year | 31,179 | | | 34,295 | |
| Net gain / (loss) from fair value adjustment (Note 8) | (4,331) | | | 1,077 | |
| Reclassification to property, plant and equipment (i) | (1,380) | | | (3,127) | |
| Exchange difference | 6,664 | | | (1,066) | |
| End of the year | 32,132 | | | 31,179 | |
| Fair value | 32,132 | | | 31,179 | |
| Net book amount | 32,132 | | | 31,179 | |
(i) Relates to newwith the expiration of contracts with third parties.
The accounting policy for all
Investment properties are measured at Fair Value. For all Investment properties with a total valuation of US$ 34.232.1 million and US$ 40.731.2 million as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 respectively, the valuation was determined using Sales Comparison Approach prepared by an independent expert. Sale prices of comparable properties are adjusted considering the specific aspects of each property, the most relevant premise being the price per hectare (Level 3). The increase /decrease in the Fair value is recognized in the Statement of income under the line item "Other operating income, net". The Group estimated that, other factors being constant, a 10% reduction on the Sales price for the period ended December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 would have reduced the value of the Investment properties on US$ 3.4 million and US$ 4.1 million respectively, which would impact the line item "Net gain from fair value adjustment ".
Changes in the Group’s intangible assets in 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Goodwill | | Software | | Trademarks | | Others | | Total |
| At January 1, 2018 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
| Cost | 12,412 |
| | 7,251 |
| | 2,461 |
| | 234 |
| | 22,358 |
|
| Accumulated amortization | — |
| | (3,400 | ) | | (1,556 | ) | | (210 | ) | | (5,166 | ) |
| Net book amount | 12,412 |
| | 3,851 |
| | 905 |
| | 24 |
| | 17,192 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2018 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| Opening net book amount | 12,412 |
| | 3,851 |
| | 905 |
| | 24 |
| | 17,192 |
|
| Adjustment of opening net book amount for the application of IAS 29 | 15,554 |
| | 836 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,390 |
|
| Exchange differences | (6,616 | ) | | (1,139 | ) | | (19 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (7,775 | ) |
| Additions | — |
| | 3,217 |
| | — |
| | 105 |
| | 3,322 |
|
| Amortization charge (i) | — |
| | (1,168 | ) | | — |
| | (52 | ) | | (1,220 | ) |
| Closing net book amount | 21,350 |
| | 5,597 |
| | 886 |
| | 76 |
| | 27,909 |
|
| At December 31, 2018 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| Cost | 21,350 |
| | 10,165 |
| | 2,442 |
| | 338 |
| | 34,295 |
|
| Accumulated amortization | — |
| | (4,568 | ) | | (1,556 | ) | | (262 | ) | | (6,386 | ) |
| Net book amount | 21,350 |
| | 5,597 |
| | 886 |
| | 76 |
| | 27,909 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| Opening net book amount | 21,350 |
| | 5,597 |
| | 886 |
| | 76 |
| | 27,909 |
|
| Exchange differences | (695 | ) | | (329 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (1,041 | ) |
| Additions | — |
| | 2,080 |
| | 6,431 |
| | 106 |
| | 8,617 |
|
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | — |
| | 66 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 66 |
|
| Disposal | (635 | ) | | (6 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (641 | ) |
| Amortization charge (i) | — |
| | (1,147 | ) | | — |
| | (84 | ) | | (1,231 | ) |
| Closing net book amount | 20,020 |
| | 6,261 |
| | 7,316 |
| | 82 |
| | 33,679 |
|
| At December 31, 2019 | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| Cost | 20,020 |
| | 11,976 |
| | 8,872 |
| | 428 |
| | 41,296 |
|
| Accumulated amortization | — |
| | (5,715 | ) | | (1,556 | ) | | (346 | ) | | (7,617 | ) |
| Net book amount | 20,020 |
| | 6,261 |
| | 7,316 |
| | 82 |
| | 33,679 |
|
| |
(i) | Amortization charges are included in “General and administrative expenses” and “Selling expenses” for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There were no impairment charges for any of the years presented (see Note 32 (a)). |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
14. Investment property (continued)
have reduced the value of the Investment properties on US$3.2 million and US$3.1 million respectively, which would impact the line item "Net gain from fair value adjustment ".
15. Intangible assets
Changes in the Group’s intangible assets in 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Goodwill | | Software | | Trademarks | | Others | | Total |
| At January 1, 2020 | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost | 20,020 | | | 11,976 | | | 8,872 | | | 428 | | | 41,296 | |
| Accumulated amortization | — | | | (5,715) | | | (1,556) | | | (346) | | | (7,617) | |
| Net book amount | 20,020 | | | 6,261 | | | 7,316 | | | 82 | | | 33,679 | |
| Year ended December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | |
| Opening net book amount | 20,020 | | | 6,261 | | | 7,316 | | | 82 | | | 33,679 | |
| Exchange differences | (1,687) | | | (954) | | | (80) | | | (35) | | | (2,756) | |
| Additions | — | | | 823 | | | 326 | | | 94 | | | 1,243 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Disposal | — | | | (46) | | | — | | | (46) | | | (92) | |
| Disposal of subsidiary | (3,851) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,851) | |
| Amortization charge (i) | — | | | (820) | | | (412) | | | (61) | | | (1,293) | |
| Closing net book amount | 14,482 | | | 5,264 | | | 7,150 | | | 34 | | | 26,930 | |
| At December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost | 14,482 | | | 11,799 | | | 9,118 | | | 441 | | | 35,840 | |
| Accumulated amortization | — | | | (6,535) | | | (1,968) | | | (407) | | | (8,910) | |
| Net book amount | 14,482 | | | 5,264 | | | 7,150 | | | 34 | | | 26,930 | |
| Year ended December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | |
| Opening net book amount | 14,482 | | | 5,264 | | | 7,150 | | | 34 | | | 26,930 | |
| Exchange differences | 2,144 | | | 595 | | | 1,407 | | | (4) | | | 4,142 | |
| Additions | — | | | 1,823 | | | — | | | 73 | | | 1,896 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization charge (i) | — | | | (1,197) | | | (366) | | | (68) | | | (1,631) | |
| Closing net book amount | 16,626 | | | 6,485 | | | 8,191 | | | 35 | | | 31,337 | |
| At December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost | 16,626 | | | 14,217 | | | 10,525 | | | 510 | | | 41,878 | |
| Accumulated amortization | — | | | (7,732) | | | (2,334) | | | (475) | | | (10,541) | |
| Net book amount | 16,626 | | | 6,485 | | | 8,191 | | | 35 | | | 31,337 | |
(i)Amortization charges are included in “General and administrative expenses” and “Selling expenses” for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were no impairment charges for any of the years presented (see Note 32 (a)).
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
16. Biological assets
Changes in the Group’s biological assets in 20192021 and 20182020 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 |
| | Crops
(ii) | | Rice
(ii) | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugarcane
(ii) | | Total |
| Beginning of the year | 43,787 | | | 29,062 | | | 12,933 | | | 4,703 | | | 75,208 | | | 165,693 | |
| Increase due to purchases | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,559 | | | — | | | 1,559 | |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets (i) | 73,990 | | | 43,834 | | | 19,895 | | | 1,362 | | | 88,659 | | | 227,740 | |
| Decrease due to harvest / disposals | (224,788) | | | (99,517) | | | (67,230) | | | (4,322) | | | (208,175) | | | (604,032) | |
| Costs incurred during the year | 151,971 | | | 62,477 | | | 50,323 | | | 2,842 | | | 116,252 | | | 383,865 | |
| Exchange differences | 9,926 | | | 6,873 | | | 3,058 | | | 1,113 | | | (617) | | | 20,353 | |
| End of the year | 54,886 | | | 42,729 | | | 18,979 | | | 7,257 | | | 71,327 | | | 195,178 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 |
| | Crops (ii) | | Rice (ii) | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugarcane (ii) | | Total |
| Beginning of the year | 27,347 |
| | 17,173 |
| | 10,298 |
| | 3,094 |
| | 47,475 |
| | 105,387 |
|
| Increase due to purchases | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,080 |
| | — |
| | 1,080 |
|
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets (i) | 29,741 |
| | 12,215 |
| | 13,510 |
| | 13 |
| | 13,110 |
| | 68,589 |
|
| Decrease due to harvest / disposals | (108,732 | ) | | (39,331 | ) | | (38,828 | ) | | (3,452 | ) | | (103,551 | ) | | (293,894 | ) |
| Costs incurred during the year | 93,715 |
| | 32,802 |
| | 26,735 |
| | 3,035 |
| | 100,775 |
| | 257,062 |
|
| Exchange differences | (3,667 | ) | | (1,375 | ) | | (194 | ) | | (97 | ) | | (2,455 | ) | | (7,788 | ) |
| End of the year | 38,404 |
| | 21,484 |
| | 11,521 |
| | 3,673 |
| | 55,354 |
| | 130,436 |
|
| | | | 2018 | | 2020 |
| | Crops (ii) | | Rice (ii) | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugarcane (ii) | | Total | | Crops
(ii) | | Rice
(ii) | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugarcane
(ii) | | Total |
| Beginning of the year | 31,745 |
| | 29,717 |
| | 9,338 |
| | 4,016 |
| | 93,178 |
| | 167,994 |
| Beginning of the year | 38,117 | | | 21,484 | | | 11,521 | | | 3,673 | | | 55,641 | | | 130,436 | |
| Adjustment of opening net book amount for the application of IAS 29 | 640 |
| | 17 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 657 |
| |
| Increase due to purchases | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 906 |
| | — |
| | 906 |
| Increase due to purchases | — | | | — | | | — | | | 580 | | | — | | | 580 | |
| | Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets (i) | 28,663 |
| | 4,125 |
| | 5,455 |
| | (1,198 | ) | | (20,850 | ) | | 16,195 |
| Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets (i) | 40,104 | | | 18,677 | | | 12,344 | | | 1,256 | | | 50,348 | | | 122,729 | |
| Decrease due to harvest / disposals | (104,941 | ) | | (39,578 | ) | | (25,800 | ) | | (1,278 | ) | | (105,536 | ) | | (277,133 | ) | Decrease due to harvest / disposals | (136,161) | | | (51,673) | | | (42,641) | | | (2,760) | | | (103,010) | | | (336,245) | |
| | Costs incurred during the year | 78,984 |
| | 33,121 |
| | 23,731 |
| | 1,769 |
| | 94,121 |
| | 231,726 |
| Costs incurred during the year | 103,076 | | | 41,243 | | | 32,043 | | | 2,003 | | | 85,006 | | | 263,371 | |
| Exchange differences | (7,744 | ) | | (10,229 | ) | | (2,426 | ) | | (1,121 | ) | | (13,438 | ) | | (34,958 | ) | Exchange differences | (1,349) | | | (669) | | | (334) | | | (49) | | | (12,777) | | | (15,178) | |
| End of the year | 27,347 |
| | 17,173 |
| | 10,298 |
| | 3,094 |
| | 47,475 |
| | 105,387 |
| End of the year | 43,787 | | | 29,062 | | | 12,933 | | | 4,703 | | | 75,208 | | | 165,693 | |
(i) Biological asset with a production cycle of more than one year (that is dairy and cattle) generated “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets” amounting to US$ 4,25713,600 for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018:2021 (2020: US$ 12,036)4,257). In 2019,2021, an amount of US$ 2,414 (2018:966 (2020: US$ 2,830)2,414) was attributable to price changes, and an amount of US$ 1,843 (2018:12,634 (2020: US$ 9,206)1,843) was attributable to physical changes.
(ii)Biological assets that are measured at fair value within level 3 of the hierarchy.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
16. | Biological assets (continued) |
16. Biological assets (continued)
Cost of production as of December 31, 2019:2021:
| | | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugar,
Ethanol and
Energy | | Total |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | 2,600 |
| | 5,192 |
| | 3,776 |
| | 582 |
| | 10,657 |
| | 22,807 |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | 3,622 | | | 8,554 | | | 5,978 | | | 800 | | | 9,681 | | | 28,635 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,465 |
| | 5,468 |
| Depreciation and amortization | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,288 | | | 4,288 | |
| Depreciation of right of use assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 31,190 |
| | 31,190 |
| Depreciation of right of use assets | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 34,312 | | | 34,312 | |
| Fertilizers, agrochemicals and seeds | 40,767 |
| | 9,924 |
| | — |
| | 33 |
| | 40,355 |
| | 91,079 |
| Fertilizers, agrochemicals and seeds | 55,223 | | | 15,549 | | | — | | | — | | | 45,053 | | | 115,825 | |
| Fuel, lubricants and others | 886 |
| | 678 |
| | 889 |
| | 77 |
| | 3,031 |
| | 5,561 |
| Fuel, lubricants and others | 691 | | | 745 | | | 1,061 | | | 60 | | | 3,298 | | | 5,855 | |
| Maintenance and repairs | 996 |
| | 2,648 |
| | 1,582 |
| | 253 |
| | 2,254 |
| | 7,733 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 1,021 | | | 7,489 | | | 3,106 | | | 345 | | | 2,287 | | | 14,248 | |
| Freights | 1,446 |
| | 318 |
| | 89 |
| | 151 |
| | — |
| | 2,004 |
| Freights | 3,752 | | | 950 | | | 179 | | | 76 | | | — | | | 4,957 | |
| Contractors and services | 27,782 |
| | 10,745 |
| | 3 |
| | 96 |
| | 5,161 |
| | 43,787 |
| Contractors and services | 49,213 | | | 23,602 | | | — | | | 10 | | | 7,072 | | | 79,897 | |
| Feeding expenses | 3 |
| | — |
| | 10,538 |
| | 810 |
| | — |
| | 11,351 |
| Feeding expenses | — | | | — | | | 20,534 | | | 373 | | | — | | | 20,907 | |
| Veterinary expenses | — |
| | — |
| | 2,020 |
| | 209 |
| | — |
| | 2,229 |
| Veterinary expenses | — | | | — | | | 3,485 | | | 217 | | | — | | | 3,702 | |
| Energy power | 69 |
| | 2,310 |
| | 979 |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | 3,368 |
| Energy power | 36 | | | 3,666 | | | 1,092 | | | 6 | | | — | | | 4,800 | |
| Professional fees | 196 |
| | 74 |
| | 138 |
| | 4 |
| | 214 |
| | 626 |
| Professional fees | 430 | | | 187 | | | 104 | | | 6 | | | 408 | | | 1,135 | |
| Other taxes | 1,182 |
| | 105 |
| | 8 |
| | 96 |
| | 43 |
| | 1,434 |
| Other taxes | 1,339 | | | 118 | | | 10 | | | 97 | | | 53 | | | 1,617 | |
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | 14,767 |
| | 53 |
| | 3 |
| | 8 |
| | 1,417 |
| | 16,248 |
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | 34,122 | | | — | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 9,024 | | | 43,149 | |
| Others | 3,018 |
| | 755 |
| | 307 |
| | 28 |
| | 988 |
| | 5,096 |
| Others | 2,522 | | | 1,617 | | | 762 | | | 29 | | | 776 | | | 5,706 | |
| Subtotal | 93,715 |
| | 32,802 |
| | 20,332 |
| | 2,357 |
| | 100,775 |
| | 249,981 |
| Subtotal | 151,971 | | | 62,477 | | | 36,312 | | | 2,021 | | | 116,252 | | | 369,033 | |
| Own agricultural produce consumed | — |
| | — |
| | 6,403 |
| | 678 |
| | — |
| | 7,081 |
| Own agricultural produce consumed | — | | | — | | | 14,011 | | | 821 | | | — | | | 14,832 | |
| Total | 93,715 |
| | 32,802 |
| | 26,735 |
| | 3,035 |
| | 100,775 |
| | 257,062 |
| Total | 151,971 | | | 62,477 | | | 50,323 | | | 2,842 | | | 116,252 | | | 383,865 | |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
16. | Biological assets (continued) |
16. Biological assets (continued)
Cost of production as of December 31, 2018:2020:
| | | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other segments | | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | Total | | Crops | | Rice | | Dairy | | All other
segments | | Sugar,
Ethanol and
Energy | | Total |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | 2,710 |
| | 5,336 |
| | 3,429 |
| | 540 |
| | 9,408 |
| | 21,423 |
| Salaries, social security expenses and employee benefits | 2,662 | | | 5,822 | | | 4,215 | | | 672 | | | 9,161 | | | 22,532 | |
| | Depreciation and amortization | 147 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,436 |
| | 3,583 |
| Depreciation and amortization | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,892 | | | 3,892 | |
| Depreciation of right of use assets | | Depreciation of right of use assets | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 27,862 | | | 27,862 | |
| Fertilizers, agrochemicals and seeds | 34,961 |
| | 10,189 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 35,016 |
| | 80,166 |
| Fertilizers, agrochemicals and seeds | 43,446 | | | 9,655 | | | 10 | | | — | | | 32,376 | | | 85,487 | |
| Fuel, lubricants and others | 811 |
| | 660 |
| | 683 |
| | 60 |
| | 2,790 |
| | 5,004 |
| Fuel, lubricants and others | 672 | | | 534 | | | 754 | | | 51 | | | 2,097 | | | 4,108 | |
| Maintenance and repairs | 943 |
| | 2,349 |
| | 1,557 |
| | 287 |
| | 1,789 |
| | 6,925 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 1,018 | | | 4,451 | | | 1,820 | | | 229 | | | 1,943 | | | 9,461 | |
| Freights | 119 |
| | 387 |
| | 80 |
| | 92 |
| | — |
| | 678 |
| Freights | 1,832 | | | 453 | | | 118 | | | 49 | | | — | | | 2,452 | |
| | Contractors and services | 23,231 |
| | 10,571 |
| | — |
| | 38 |
| | 5,621 |
| | 39,461 |
| Contractors and services | 30,170 | | | 15,681 | | | — | | | 19 | | | 5,600 | | | 51,470 | |
| | Feeding expenses | — |
| | — |
| | 9,795 |
| | 146 |
| | — |
| | 9,941 |
| Feeding expenses | — | | | — | | | 13,092 | | | 285 | | | — | | | 13,377 | |
| Veterinary expenses | — |
| | — |
| | 1,522 |
| | 141 |
| | — |
| | 1,663 |
| Veterinary expenses | — | | | — | | | 2,395 | | | 189 | | | — | | | 2,584 | |
| Energy power | 109 |
| | 2,432 |
| | 764 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,305 |
| Energy power | 51 | | | 2,138 | | | 863 | | | 6 | | | — | | | 3,058 | |
| Professional fees | 165 |
| | 83 |
| | 140 |
| | 4 |
| | 177 |
| | 569 |
| Professional fees | 564 | | | 1,838 | | | 162 | | | 4 | | | 344 | | | 2,912 | |
| Other taxes | 1,293 |
| | 114 |
| | 8 |
| | 83 |
| | 42 |
| | 1,540 |
| Other taxes | 1,185 | | | 100 | | | 8 | | | 83 | | | 51 | | | 1,427 | |
| | Lease expense and similar arrangements | 11,868 |
| | 174 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | 34,666 |
| | 46,711 |
| Lease expense and similar arrangements | 19,693 | | | 109 | | | 3 | | | 2 | | | 1,005 | | | 20,812 | |
| | Others | 2,627 |
| | 826 |
| | 289 |
| | 30 |
| | 1,176 |
| | 4,948 |
| Others | 1,783 | | | 462 | | | 460 | | | 9 | | | 675 | | | 3,389 | |
| Subtotal | 78,984 |
| | 33,121 |
| | 18,267 |
| | 1,424 |
| | 94,121 |
| | 225,917 |
| Subtotal | 103,076 | | | 41,243 | | | 23,900 | | | 1,598 | | | 85,006 | | | 254,823 | |
| Own agricultural produce consumed | — |
| | — |
| | 5,464 |
| | 345 |
| | — |
| | 5,809 |
| Own agricultural produce consumed | — | | | — | | | 8,143 | | | 405 | | | — | | | 8,548 | |
| Total | 78,984 |
| | 33,121 |
| | 23,731 |
| | 1,769 |
| | 94,121 |
| | 231,726 |
| Total | 103,076 | | | 41,243 | | | 32,043 | | | 2,003 | | | 85,006 | | | 263,371 | |
Biological assets in December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 were as follows:
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Non-current | |
| | |
| Non-current | | | |
| Cattle for dairy production (i) | 11,397 |
| | 9,859 |
| Cattle for dairy production (i) | 18,428 | | | 12,600 | |
| Breeding cattle (ii) | 1,783 |
| | 1,310 |
| Breeding cattle (ii) | 707 | | | 2,003 | |
| Other cattle (ii) | 123 |
| | 101 |
| Other cattle (ii) | 220 | | | 122 | |
| | 13,303 |
| | 11,270 |
| | 19,355 | | | 14,725 | |
| Current | |
| | |
| Current | | | |
| Breeding cattle (iii) | 1,677 |
| | 1,683 |
| Breeding cattle (iii) | 6,330 | | | 2,578 | |
| Other cattle (iii) | 214 |
| | 439 |
| Other cattle (iii) | 551 | | | 333 | |
| Sown land – crops (ii) | 38,404 |
| | 27,347 |
| Sown land – crops (ii) | 54,886 | | | 43,787 | |
| Sown land – rice (ii) | 21,484 |
| | 17,173 |
| Sown land – rice (ii) | 42,729 | | | 29,062 | |
| Sown land – sugarcane (ii) | 55,354 |
| | 47,475 |
| |
| Sown land – sugarcane (ii) (iv) | | Sown land – sugarcane (ii) (iv) | 71,327 | | | 75,208 | |
| | 117,133 |
| | 94,117 |
| | 175,823 | | | 150,968 | |
| Total biological assets | 130,436 |
| | 105,387 |
| Total biological assets | 195,178 | | | 165,693 | |
| |
(i) | Classified as bearer and mature biological assets. |
| |
(ii) | Classified as consumable and immature biological assets. |
| |
(iii) | Classified as consumable and mature biological assets. |
(i)Classified as bearer and mature biological assets.
(ii)Classified as consumable and immature biological assets.
(iii)Classified as consumable and mature biological assets.
(iv)It includes 6,969 and 3,702 of crops planted in sugarcane farms.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
16. | Biological assets (continued) |
16. Biological assets (continued)
The fair value less estimated point of sale costs of agricultural produce at the point of harvest amounted to US$ 105,536532,480 for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018:2021 (2020: US$ 113,184)290,844).
The following table presents the Group´sGroup’s biological assets that are measured at fair value at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (see Note 17 to see the description of each fair value level):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cattle for dairy production | — | | | 18,428 | | | — | | | 18,428 | | | — | | | 12,600 | | | — | | | 12,600 | |
| Breeding cattle | 7,037 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,037 | | | 4,581 | | | — | | | — | | | 4,581 | |
| Other cattle | — | | | 771 | | | — | | | 771 | | | — | | | 455 | | | — | | | 455 | |
| Sown land – sugarcane | — | | | — | | | 71,327 | | | 71,327 | | | — | | | — | | | 75,208 | | | 75,208 | |
| Sown land – crops | — | | | — | | | 54,886 | | | 54,886 | | | — | | | — | | | 43,787 | | | 43,787 | |
| Sown land – rice | — | | | — | | | 42,729 | | | 42,729 | | | — | | | — | | | 29,062 | | | 29,062 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cattle for dairy production | — |
| | 11,397 |
| | — |
| | 11,397 |
| | — |
| | 9,859 |
| | — |
| | 9,859 |
|
| Breeding cattle | 3,460 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,460 |
| | 2,993 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,993 |
|
| Other cattle | 1 |
| | 336 |
| | — |
| | 337 |
| | — |
| | 540 |
| | — |
| | 540 |
|
| Sown land – sugarcane | — |
| | — |
| | 55,354 |
| | 55,354 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47,475 |
| | 47,475 |
|
| Sown land – crops | — |
| | — |
| | 38,404 |
| | 38,404 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 27,347 |
| | 27,347 |
|
| Sown land – rice | — |
| | — |
| | 21,484 |
| | 21,484 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17,173 |
| | 17,173 |
|
There were no transfers between any levels during the year.
The following significant unobservable inputs were used to measure the Group´sGroup’s biological assets using the discounted cash flow valuation technique:
| | | Description | | Unobservable inputs | | Range of unobservable inputs | | Relationship of unobservable inputs to fair value | Description | | Unobservable
inputs | | Range of unobservable inputs | | Relationship of unobservable
inputs to fair value |
| | | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | | | | | | 2021 | | 2020 | | |
| Sown land – sugarcane | | Sugarcane yield – tonnes per hectare; Sugarcane TRS (kg of sugar per ton of cane) Production Costs – US$ per hectare. (Include maintenance, harvest and leasing costs)
| | -Sugarcane yield: 60-100 tn/ha
-Sugarcane TRS: 120-140 kg of sugar/ton of cane
-Maintenance costs: 500-700 US$/ha
-Harvest costs: 9.0 -15.0 US$/ton of cane
-Leasing costs: 12.0-14.4 tn/ha | | -Sugarcane yield: 60-100 tn/ha
-Sugarcane TRS: 120-140 kg of sugar/ton of cane
-Maintenance costs: 500-700 US$/ha
-Harvest costs: 9.0 -15.0 US$/ton of cane
-Leasing costs: 12.0-14.4 tn/ha | | The higher the sugarcane yield, the higher the fair value. The higher the maintenance, harvest and leasing costs per hectare, the lower the fair value. The higher the TRS of sugarcane, the higher the fair value.
| Sown land – sugarcane | | Sugarcane yield – tonnes per hectare; Sugarcane TRS (kg of sugar per ton of cane) Production Costs – US$ per hectare. (Include maintenance, harvest and leasing costs)
| | '-Sugarcane yield: 50-100 tn/ha -Sugarcane TRS: 120-140 kg of sugar/ton of cane -Maintenance costs: 500-800 US$/ha -Harvest costs: 6.0-12.0 US$/ton of cane -Leasing costs: 12.0-14.4 tn/ha | | '-Sugarcane yield: 60-100tn/ha - Sugarcane TRS: 120-140kg of sugar/ton of cane - Maintenance costs: 400-600 US$/ha - Harvest costs: 6.0-12.0 US$/ton of cane - Leasing costs: 12.0-14.4 tn/ha | | The higher the sugarcane yield, the higher the fair value. The higher the maintenance, harvest and leasing costs per hectare, the lower the fair value. The higher the TRS of sugarcane, the higher the fair value.
|
| Sown land – crops | | Crops yield – tonnes per hectare; Commercial Costs – US$ per hectare;
Production Costs – US$ per hectare.
| | - Crops yield: 0.95 – 4.69 tn/ha for Wheat, 2.5 – 10 tn/ha for Corn, 1.19 - 3.8 tn/ha for Soybean and 1.6-3 for Sunflower
- Commercial Costs: 6-43 US$/ha for Wheat, 2-51 US$/ha for Corn, 7-59 US$/ha for Soybean and 2-71 US$/ha for Sunflower
- Production Costs: 115-574 US$/ha for Wheat, 198-859 US$/ha for Corn, 159-679 US$/ha for Soybean and 233-641 US$/ha for Sunflower | | - Crops yield: 1.2 – 5.2 tn/ha for Wheat, 2.2 – 9.4 tn/ha for Corn, 1.1 - 4.1 tn/ha for Soybean and 1.5-2.1 for Sunflower
- Commercial Costs: 55-120 US$/ha for Wheat, 85-230 US$/ha for Corn, 55-110 US$/ha for Soybean and 45-80 US$/ha for Sunflower
- Production Costs: 140-460 US$/ha for Wheat, 300-620 US$/ha for Corn, 260-460 US$/ha for Soybean and 220-360 US$/ha for Sunflower | | The higher the crops yield, the higher the fair value. The higher the commercial and direct costs per hectare, the lower the fair value.
| Sown land – crops | | Crops yield – tonnes per hectare; Commercial Costs – US$ per hectare;
Production Costs – US$ per hectare.
| | '- Crops yield: 0.85 – 5.6 tn/ha for Wheat, 3.0 – 10 tn/ha for Corn, 1.1 - 4.0 tn/ha for Soybean, 1.7 - 2.5 for Sunflower and 2.5 - 3.6 tn/ha for Peanut - Commercial Costs: 17-54 US$/tn for Wheat, 14-62 US$/ton for Corn, 19-65 US$/ton for Soybean, 18-49 US$/ton for Sunflower and 36-69 US$/ha for Peanut - Production Costs: 166-899 US$/ha for Wheat, 334-1449 US$/ha for Corn, 214-1096 US$/ha for Soybean, 308-1005 US$/ha for Sunflower and 802-2060 US$/ha for Peanut | | '- Crops yield: 0.95 – 5.5 tn/ha for Wheat, 2.5 – 11 tn/ha for Corn, 0.8 - 3.8 tn/ha for Soybean, 0.6-3.0 for Sunflower and 2.5 - 3.5 tn/ha for Peanut - Commercial Costs: 6-43 US$/ha for Wheat, 2-51 US$/ha for Corn, 7-59 US$/ha for Soybean, 1-71 US$/ha for Sunflower and 22.0 - 31.0 US$/ha for Peanut - Production Costs: 115-612 US$/ha for Wheat, 198-990 US$/ha for Corn, 159-750 US$/ha for Soybean, 233-641 US$/ha for Sunflower and 695.0 - 1,400.0 US$/ha for Peanut | | The higher the crops yield, the higher the fair value. The higher the commercial and direct costs per hectare, the lower the fair value.
|
| Sown land – rice | | Rice yield – tonnes per hectare;
Commercial Costs – US$ per hectare;
Production Costs – US$ per hectare. | | -Rice yield: 6.5 -7.5 tn/ha
-Commercial Costs: 8-12 US$/ha
-Production Costs: 750-950 US$/ha | | -Rice yield: 6.0 -7.4 tn/ha
-Commercial Costs: 11-14 US$/ha
-Production Costs: 830-1,090 US$/ha | | The higher the rice yield, the higher the fair value. The higher the commercial and direct costs per hectare, the lower the fair value.
| Sown land – rice | | Rice yield – tonnes per hectare;
Commercial Costs – US$ per hectare;
Production Costs – US$ per hectare. | | '-Rice yield: 3.2 -10.1 tn/ha -Commercial Costs: 8-25 US$/ha -Production Costs: 810-1300 US$/ha | | '-Rice yield: 6.5 -7.5 tn/ha -Commercial Costs: 8-16 US$/ha -Production Costs: 750-950 US$/ha | | The higher the rice yield, the higher the fair value. The higher the commercial and direct costs per hectare, the lower the fair value.
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
16. | Biological assets (continued) |
16. Biological assets (continued)
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the impact of a reasonable 10 %10% increase (decrease) in estimated costs, with all other variables held constant, would result in a decrease (increase) in the fair value of the Group’s plantations less cost to sell of US$ 7.914.8 million for sugarcane, US$ 2.85.4 million for crops and US$ 2.04.9 million for rice.
As of December 31, 2018,2020, the impact of a reasonable 10 %10% increase (decrease) in estimated costs, with all other variables held constant, would result in a decrease (increase) in the fair value of the Group’s plantations less cost to sell of US$ 8.614.7 million for sugarcane, US$ 1.53.7 million for crops and US$ 3.43.7 million for rice.
| |
17. | Investments in joint ventures |
The table below lists the Group’s investment in joint ventures for the years ended December 31 2018 and 2017:17. Financial instruments by category
|
| | | | | |
| | | % of ownership interest held |
| Name of the entity | Country of incorporation and operation | 2018 | 2017 |
| CHS AGRO S.A. | Argentina | 50 | % | 50 | % |
On February 26, 2013, the Group formed CHS AGRO, a joint venture with CHS Inc. CHS Inc. is a leading farmer-owned energy, grains and foods company based in the United States. The Group holds a 50% interest in CHS AGRO. On October 2014, CHS AGRO finished its sunflower processing plant in the city of Pehuajo, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
In January 2019, the Company acquired, the remaining 50% of CHS Agro S.A. a joint venture between the Company and CHS Argentina S.A. After this acquisition, the Company own 100% of CHS Agro S.A. which has since been renamed as Girasoles del Plata S.A. (See Note 22). Thus, the Company is not part of any Joint Venture as of December 31, 2019.
The following amounts represent the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities, and income and expenses of the joint ventures:
|
| | |
| 2018 |
Assets: | |
|
Non-current assets | 9,860 |
|
Current assets | 6,710 |
|
| 16,570 |
|
Liabilities: | |
|
Non-current liabilities | 25,949 |
|
Current liabilities | 18,622 |
|
| 44,571 |
|
Net liabilities of joint venture | (28,001 | ) |
|
| | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Income | 9,305 |
| | 14,879 |
|
| Expenses | (31,989 | ) | | (22,657 | ) |
| Loss before income tax | (22,684 | ) | | (7,778 | ) |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
18. | Financial instruments by category |
The Group classified its financial assets in the following categories:
(a) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short-term. Derivatives are also categorized as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. For all years presented, the Group’s financial assets at fair value through profit or loss comprise mainly derivative financial instruments.
(b) Financial assets at amortized cost.
Financial assets at amortized cost, namely loans and receivables, are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivables comprise “trade and other receivables” and “cash and cash equivalents” in the statement of financial position.
The following tables show the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities by category of financial instrument and reconciliation to the corresponding line item in the statements of financial position, as appropriate. Since the line items “Trade and other receivables, net” and “Trade and other payables” contain both financial instruments and non-financial assets or liabilities (such as other tax receivables or advance payments for services to be received in the future), the reconciliation is shown in the columns headed “Non-financial assets” and “Non-financial liabilities”. There was no reclassification between categories for the adoption of IFRS 9.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Financial assets at amortized cost | | Assets at fair
value through
profit or loss | | Subtotal
financial
assets | | Non-
financial
assets | | Total |
| | Financial assets at amortized cost | | Assets at fair value through profit or loss | | Subtotal financial assets | | Non- financial assets | | Total | |
| December 31, 2019 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | |
| Assets as per statement of financial position | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Assets as per statement of financial position | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade and other receivables | 88,113 |
| | — |
| | 88,113 |
| | 84,218 |
| | 172,331 |
| Trade and other receivables | 101,371 | | | — | | | 101,371 | | | 86,709 | | | 188,080 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | — |
| | 1,435 |
| | 1,435 |
| | — |
| | 1,435 |
| Derivative financial instruments | — | | | 1,585 | | | 1,585 | | | — | | | 1,585 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 290,276 |
| | — |
| | 290,276 |
| | — |
| | 290,276 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 199,766 | | | — | | | 199,766 | | | — | | | 199,766 | |
| Total | 378,389 |
| | 1,435 |
| | 379,824 |
| | 84,218 |
| | 464,042 |
| Total | 301,137 | | | 1,585 | | | 302,722 | | | 86,709 | | | 389,431 | |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
17. Financial instruments by category (continued)
| | | | Liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | | Financial liabilities at amortized cost | | Subtotal financial liabilities | | Non- financial liabilities | | Total | | Liabilities at
fair value
through profit
or loss | | Financial
liabilities at
amortized cost | | Subtotal
financial
liabilities | | Non-
financial
liabilities | | Total |
| Liabilities as per statement of financial position | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Liabilities as per statement of financial position | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade and other payables | — |
| | 98,420 |
| | 98,420 |
| | 12,066 |
| | 110,486 |
| Trade and other payables | — | | | 153,459 | | | 153,459 | | | 15,571 | | | 169,030 | |
| Borrowings (excluding lease liabilities) (i) | — |
| | 968,280 |
| | 968,280 |
| | — |
| | 968,280 |
| |
| Borrowings (i) | | Borrowings (i) | — | | | 817,651 | | | 817,651 | | | — | | | 817,651 | |
| | Leases Liabilities | — |
| | 216,384 |
| | 216,384 |
| | — |
| | 216,384 |
| Leases Liabilities | — | | | 246,854 | | | 246,854 | | | — | | | 246,854 | |
| Derivative financial instruments (i) | 1,423 |
| | — |
| | 1,423 |
| | — |
| | 1,423 |
| Derivative financial instruments (i) | 1,283 | | | — | | | 1,283 | | | — | | | 1,283 | |
| Total | 1,423 |
| | 1,283,084 |
| | 1,284,507 |
| | 12,066 |
| | 1,296,573 |
| Total | 1,283 | | | 1,217,964 | | | 1,219,247 | | | 15,571 | | | 1,234,818 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial assets at amortized cost | | Assets at fair
value through
profit or loss | | Subtotal
financial
assets | | Non-
financial
assets | | Total |
| December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | |
| Assets as per statement of financial position | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade and other receivables | 109,231 | | | — | | | 109,231 | | | 88,697 | | | 197,928 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | — | | | 2,102 | | | 2,102 | | | — | | | 2,102 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 336,282 | | | — | | | 336,282 | | | — | | | 336,282 | |
| Total | 445,513 | | | 2,102 | | | 447,615 | | | 88,697 | | | 536,312 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Liabilities at
fair value
through profit
or loss | | Financial
liabilities at
amortized cost | | Subtotal
financial
liabilities | | Non-
financial
liabilities | | Total |
| Liabilities as per statement of financial position | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade and other payables | — | | | 114,813 | | | 114,813 | | | 11,792 | | | 126,605 | |
| Borrowings (i) | — | | | 971,090 | | | 971,090 | | | — | | | 971,090 | |
| Leases Liabilities | — | | | 195,772 | | | 195,772 | | | — | | | 195,772 | |
| Derivative financial instruments (i) | 13,141 | | | — | | | 13,141 | | | — | | | 13,141 | |
| Total | 13,141 | | | 1,281,675 | | | 1,294,816 | | | 11,792 | | | 1,306,608 | |
(i) Effective July 1, 2013 the Group formally documented and designated cash flow hedging relationships to hedge the foreign exchange rate risk of a portion of its highly probable future sales in U.S. Dollars using a portion of its borrowings denominated in U.S. Dollars, currency forwards and foreign currency floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps (see Note 2).
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
18. | Financial instruments by category (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial assets at amortized cost | | Assets at fair value through profit or loss | | Subtotal financial assets | | Non- financial assets | | Total |
| December 31, 2018 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Assets as per statement of financial position | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Trade and other receivables | 91,183 |
| | — |
| | 91,183 |
| | 106,323 |
| | 197,506 |
|
| Derivative financial instruments | — |
| | 6,286 |
| | 6,286 |
| | — |
| | 6,286 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 273,635 |
| | — |
| | 273,635 |
| | — |
| | 273,635 |
|
| Total | 364,818 |
| | 6,286 |
| | 371,104 |
| | 106,323 |
| | 477,427 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | | Financial liabilities at amortized cost | | Subtotal financial liabilities | | Non- financial liabilities | | Total |
| Liabilities as per statement of financial position | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Trade and other payables | — |
| | 96,167 |
| | 96,167 |
| | 10,270 |
| | 106,437 |
|
| Borrowings (excluding finance lease liabilities) (i) | — |
| | 861,521 |
| | 861,521 |
| | — |
| | 861,521 |
|
| Finance leases | — |
| | 595 |
| | 595 |
| | — |
| | 595 |
|
| Derivative financial instruments (i) | 283 |
| | — |
| | 283 |
| | — |
| | 283 |
|
| Total | 283 |
| | 958,283 |
| | 958,566 |
| | 10,270 |
| | 968,836 |
|
(i) Effective July 1, 2013 the Group formally documented and designated cash flow hedging relationships to hedge the foreign exchange rate risk of a portion of its highly probable future sales in U.S. Dollars using a portion of its borrowings denominated in U.S. Dollars, currency forwards and foreign currency floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps (see Note 2).
From January 1, 2019, the group applied IFRS 16. Liabilities carried at amortized cost also included liabilities under finance leases where the Group is the lessee and which therefore have to be measured in accordance with IAS 17. The categories disclosed are determined by reference to IFRS 9. Finance leases are excluded from the scope of IFRS 7. Therefore, finance leases have been shown separately in 2018.
Because of the short maturities of most trade accounts receivable and payable, other receivables and liabilities, and cash and cash equivalents, their carrying amounts at the closing date do not differ significantly from their respective fair values. The fair value of long-term borrowings is disclosed in Note 27.26.
Income, expense, gains and losses on financial instruments can be assigned to the following categories:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial asset at amortized cost | | Assets/ liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost | | Total |
| December 31, 2019 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest income (i) | 7,319 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,319 |
|
| Interest expense (i) | (35,208 | ) | | (27 | ) | | (24,899 | ) | | (60,134 | ) |
| Foreign exchange losses (i) | (19,807 | ) | | (16,227 | ) | | (72,424 | ) | | (108,458 | ) |
| (Loss) / gain from derivative financial instruments (ii) | (870 | ) | | 1,441 |
| | — |
| | 571 |
|
| Finance cost related to lease liabilities | — |
| | (9,524 | ) | | — |
| | (9,524 | ) |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
18. | Financial instruments by category (continued) |
17. Financial instruments by category (continued)
Income, expense, gains and losses on financial instruments can be assigned to the following categories:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial assets at amortized cost | | Assets/ liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | | Financial liabilities at amortized cost | | Total |
| December 31, 2018 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest income (i) | 7,915 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,915 |
|
| Interest expense (i) | (35,794 | ) | | — |
| | (15,783 | ) | | (51,577 | ) |
| Foreign exchange gains / (losses) (i) | (108,936 | ) | | (41,218 | ) | | (33,041 | ) | | (183,195 | ) |
| Gain from derivative financial instruments (ii) | — |
| | 51,670 |
| | — |
| | 51,670 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial asset / liabilities at amortized cost | | Assets/ liabilities
at fair value
through profit or
loss | | | | Total |
| December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | |
| Interest income (i) | 4,081 | | | — | | | | | 4,081 | |
| Interest expense (i) | (62,536) | | | — | | | | | (62,536) | |
| Foreign exchange (losses) / gain (i) | 18,939 | | | — | | | | | 18,939 | |
| Loss from derivative financial instruments (ii) | — | | | (15,478) | | | | | (15,478) | |
| Finance cost related to lease liabilities | (16,502) | | | — | | | | | (16,502) | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial assets / liabilities at amortized cost | | Assets/ liabilities
at fair value
through profit or
loss | | | | Total |
| December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | |
| Interest income (i) | 4,084 | | | — | | | | | 4,084 | |
| Interest expense (i) | (58,282) | | | — | | | | | (58,282) | |
| Foreign exchange gains losses (i) | (109,266) | | | — | | | | | (109,266) | |
| Loss from derivative financial instruments (ii) | — | | | (8,228) | | | | | (8,228) | |
| Finance cost related to lease liabilities | (12,532) | | | — | | | | | (12,532) | |
| | | | | | | |
| |
(i) | Included in “Financial Results, net” in the consolidated statement of income. |
| |
(ii) | Included in “Other operating income, net” and “Financial Results, net” in the consolidated statement of income. |
(i)Included in “Financial Results, net” in the consolidated statement of income.
(ii)Included in “Other operating income, net” and “Financial Results, net” in the consolidated statement of income.
Determining fair values
IFRS 13 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. All financial instruments recognized at fair value are allocated to one of the valuation hierarchy levels of IFRS 13. This valuation hierarchy provides for three levels. The allocation reflects which of the fair values derive from transactions in the market and where valuation is based on models because market transactions are lacking. The level in the fair value hierarchy is categorized in its entirety is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
As of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the financial instruments recognized at fair value on the statement of financial position comprise derivative financial instruments.
In the case of Level 1, valuation is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical financial assets that the Group can refer to at the date of the statement of financial position. The financial instruments the Group has allocated to this level mainly comprise crop futures and options traded on the stock market.
Derivatives not traded on the stock market allocated to Level 2 are valued using models based on observable market data. The financial instruments the Group has allocated to this level mainly comprise interest-rate swaps and foreign-currency interest-rate swaps.
In the case of Level 3, the Group uses valuation techniques not based on inputs observable in the market. This is only permissible insofar as no observable market data are available. The Group does not have financial instruments allocated to this level for any of the years presented.
The following tables present the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and their allocation to the fair value hierarchy:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| Assets | | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Derivative financial instruments | 2019 | | 1,257 |
| | 178 |
| | 1,435 |
|
| Derivative financial instruments | 2018 | | 6,286 |
| | — |
| | 6,286 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Liabilities | | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Derivative financial instruments | 2019 | | (1,423 | ) | | — |
| | (1,423 | ) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 2018 | | (254 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (283 | ) |
There were no transfers within level 1 and 2 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
18. | Financial instruments by category (continued) |
17. Financial instruments by category (continued)
The following tables present the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and their allocation to the fair value hierarchy:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| Assets | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 2021 | | 828 | | | 757 | | | 1,585 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 2020 | | 151 | | | 1,951 | | | 2,102 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Liabilities | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 2021 | | (1,283) | | | — | | | (1,283) | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 2020 | | (12,984) | | | (157) | | | (13,141) | |
There were no transfers within level 1 and 2 during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
When no quoted prices in an active market are available, fair values (particularly with derivatives) are based on recognized valuation methods. The Group uses a range of valuation models for this purpose, details of which may be obtained from the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class | | Pricing Method | | Parameters | | Pricing Model | | Level | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Futures | | Quoted price | | — | | — | | 1 | | (455) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate swaps | | Theoretical price | | Money market interest-rate curve | | Present value method | | 2 | | 757 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 302 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class | | Pricing Method | | Parameters | | Pricing Model | | Level | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Futures | | Quoted price | | — | | — | | 1 | | (166 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| NDF | | Quoted price | | Foreign-exchange curve. | | Present value method | | 2 | | 178 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | 12 |
|
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
19. | 18. Trade and other receivables, net |
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Non-current | |
| | |
| Non-current | | | |
| | Advances to suppliers | 723 |
| | 2,343 |
| Advances to suppliers | 952 | | | 1,704 | |
| Income tax credits | 5,240 |
| | 4,429 |
| Income tax credits | 6,862 | | | 5,283 | |
| Non-income tax credits (i) | 16,895 |
| | 15,998 |
| Non-income tax credits (i) | 19,156 | | | 18,195 | |
| Judicial deposits | 2,596 |
| | 2,908 |
| Judicial deposits | 1,674 | | | 2,188 | |
| Receivable from disposal of subsidiary | 17,047 |
| | 10,944 |
| |
| Receivable from disposal of subsidiary (Note 21) | | Receivable from disposal of subsidiary (Note 21) | 9,830 | | | 23,093 | |
| | Other receivables | 2,492 |
| | 2,198 |
| Other receivables | 3,757 | | | 1,803 | |
| Non-current portion | 44,993 |
| | 38,820 |
| Non-current portion | 42,231 | | | 52,266 | |
| Current | |
| | |
| Current | | | |
| Trade receivables | 55,271 |
| | 60,167 |
| Trade receivables | 63,726 | | | 58,530 | |
| Receivables from related parties (Note 33) | — |
| | 8,337 |
| |
| | Less: Allowance for trade receivables | (3,773 | ) | | (2,503 | ) | Less: Allowance for trade receivables | (3,023) | | | (3,965) | |
| Trade receivables – net | 51,498 |
| | 66,001 |
| Trade receivables – net | 60,703 | | | 54,565 | |
| Prepaid expenses | 12,521 |
| | 9,396 |
| Prepaid expenses | 9,405 | | | 10,427 | |
| Advances to suppliers | 14,417 |
| | 43,365 |
| Advances to suppliers | 19,074 | | | 17,751 | |
| Income tax credits | 1,059 |
| | 2,560 |
| Income tax credits | 1,846 | | | 1,709 | |
| Non-income tax credits (i) | 33,363 |
| | 28,232 |
| Non-income tax credits (i) | 29,414 | | | 33,628 | |
| Receivable from disposal of subsidiary (Note 22) | 5,716 |
| | 3,709 |
| |
| Receivable from disposal of subsidiary (Note 21) | | Receivable from disposal of subsidiary (Note 21) | 17,259 | | | 15,506 | |
| Cash collateral | 23 |
| | 1,505 |
| Cash collateral | 21 | | | 36 | |
| Receivables from related parties (Note 33) | — |
| | 324 |
| |
| | Other receivables | 8,741 |
| | 3,594 |
| Other receivables | 8,127 | | | 12,040 | |
| Subtotal | 75,840 |
| | 92,685 |
| Subtotal | 85,146 | | | 91,097 | |
| Current portion | 127,338 |
| | 158,686 |
| Current portion | 145,849 | | | 145,662 | |
| Total trade and other receivables, net | 172,331 |
| | 197,506 |
| Total trade and other receivables, net | 188,080 | | | 197,928 | |
(i) Includes US$ 226 (2018:303 (2020: US$ 575)363) reclassified from property, plant and equipment.
The fair values of current trade and other receivables approximate their respective carrying amounts due to their short-term nature. The fair values of non-current trade and other receivables approximate their carrying amount, as the impact of discounting is not significant.
The carrying amounts of the Group’s trade and other receivables are denominated in the following currencies (expressed in U.S. Dollars):
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Currency | |
| | |
| Currency | | | |
| U.S. Dollar | 37,131 |
| | 52,342 |
| U.S. Dollar | 62,604 | | | 56,531 | |
| Argentine Peso | 45,520 |
| | 42,896 |
| Argentine Peso | 55,260 | | | 55,433 | |
| Uruguayan Peso | 999 |
| | 534 |
| Uruguayan Peso | 460 | | | 811 | |
| Brazilian Reais | 88,681 |
| | 101,734 |
| Brazilian Reais | 69,756 | | | 85,153 | |
| | 172,331 |
| | 197,506 |
| |
| | | | 188,080 | | | 197,928 | |
As of December 31, 20192021 trade receivables of US$ 11,284 (2018:11,224 (2020: US$ 5,052)11,623) were past due but not impaired. The ageingaging analysis of these receivables indicates that US$ 381717 and US$ 318977 are over 6 months in December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
19. | Trade and other receivables, net (continued) |
Since January 1, 2018, for trade receivables, the Company applies the simplified approach permitted by IFRS 9, which requires expected lifetime losses to be recognized from initial recognition of the receivables.
Until December 31, 2017 the Group recognized an allowance for trade receivables when there was objective evidence that the Group would not be able to collect all amounts due according
F- 57
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the original terms of the receivables.Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
18. Trade and other receivables, net (continued)
Delinquency in payments was an indicator that a receivable may be impaired. However, management considers all available evidence in determining when a receivable is impaired. Generally, trade receivables, which are more than 180 days past due are fully provided for. However, certain receivables 180+ days overdue are not provided for based on a case-by-case analysis of credit quality analysis. Furthermore, receivables, which are not 180+ days overdue, may be provided for if specific analysis indicates a potential impairment.
Movements on the Group’s allowance for trade receivables are as follows:
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| At January 1 | 2,503 |
| | 1,002 |
| | 643 |
| At January 1 | 3,965 | | | 3,773 | | | 2,503 | |
| Charge of the year | 3,656 |
| | 2,468 |
| | 758 |
| Charge of the year | 2,022 | | | 2,192 | | | 3,656 | |
| Acquisition of subsidiary | 46 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Acquisition of subsidiary | — | | | — | | | 46 | |
| Unused amounts reversed | (1,314 | ) | | (237 | ) | | (133 | ) | Unused amounts reversed | (970) | | | (769) | | | (1,314) | |
| Used during the year | (48 | ) | | (281 | ) | | (193 | ) | Used during the year | (1,456) | | | (446) | | | (48) | |
| Exchange differences | (1,070 | ) | | (449 | ) | | (73 | ) | Exchange differences | (538) | | | (785) | | | (1,070) | |
| At December 31 | 3,773 |
| | 2,503 |
| | 1,002 |
| At December 31 | 3,023 | | | 3,965 | | | 3,773 | |
The creation and release of allowance for trade receivables have been included in “Selling expenses” in the statement of income. Amounts charged to the allowance account are generally written off, when there is no expectation of recovering additional cash.
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of receivable mentioned above.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, approximately 26% (2018: 89%53% (2020: 25%) of the outstanding unimpaired trade receivables (neither past due not impaired) relate to sales to 24 well-known multinational companies with good credit quality standing, including but not limited to Raizen Combustiveis S.A.Itersnack Procurement B.V., Camara de Comercializacao de Energia Electrica CCEE, Establecimientos Las Marias SACIFA, Cofco ResourcesThe Real Peunats Company, Interfood Americas S.A., GranarMastellone Hnos. S.A., Rodoil Distribuidora de Combustiveis LTDA,Cencosud S.A., among others. Most of these entities or their parent companies are externally credit-rated. The Group reviews these external ratings from credit agencies.
The remaining percentage as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 of the outstanding unimpaired trade receivables (neither past due nor impaired) relate to sales to a dispersed large quantity of customers for which external credit ratings may not be available. However, the total base of customers without an external credit rating is relatively stable.
New customers with less than six months of history with the Group are closely monitored. The Group has not experienced credit problems with these new customers to date. The majority of the customers for which an external credit rating is not available are existing customers with more than six months of history with the Group and with no defaults in the past. A minor percentage of customers may have experienced some non-significant defaults in the past but fully recovered.
19. Inventories
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Raw materials | 101,270 | | | 56,420 | |
| Finished goods (Note 5) (1) | 138,254 | | | 77,041 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 239,524 | | | 133,461 | |
(1) Finished goods of Crops reportable segment are valued at fair value.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
20. Cash and cash equivalents |
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Raw materials | 47,501 |
| | 48,140 |
|
| Finished goods (Note 5) (1) | 65,278 |
| | 79,758 |
|
| Others | 11 |
| | 204 |
|
| | 112,790 |
| | 128,102 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Cash at bank and on hand | 152,721 | | | 178,079 | |
| Short-term bank deposits | 47,045 | | | 158,203 | |
| | 199,766 | | | 336,282 | |
(1) Finished goods of Crops reportable segment are valued at fair value.
21. Disposals and acquisitions
| |
21. | Cash and cash equivalents |
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Cash at bank and on hand | 124,701 |
| | 197,544 |
|
| Short-term bank deposits | 165,575 |
| | 76,091 |
|
| | 290,276 |
| | 273,635 |
|
| |
22. | Disposals and acquisitions |
Acquisitions
In January 2019, the Company acquired, the remaining 50% of CHS Agro S.A. a joint venture between the Company and CHS Argentina S.A. After this acquisition, we own 100% of CHS Agro S.A. which has since been renamed as Girasoles del Plata S.A. The consideration for this operation was nominal. At the day of the acquisition, wethe company had our participation valued at 0. As a result of this transaction, the Company recognized a gain in the line item Other Operating Income of USD 0.2 million.
Net assets acquired are as follows:
|
| | |
Property, plant and equipment | 21,800 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 41 |
|
Inventories | 1,866 |
|
Trade and other receivables, net | 4,492 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities | (4,546 | ) |
Trade and other payables | (1,031 | ) |
Current income tax liabilities | (5 | ) |
Payroll and Social liabilities | (153 | ) |
Borrowings | (23,062 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents added as a result of the business combination | 747 |
|
Total net assets added as a result of business combination | 149 |
|
Fair value of previously held equity interest | 74 |
|
Gain for bargain purchase | 75 |
|
In January 2019, the Company acquired 100% of Olam Alimentos S.A. whose principal asset is a peanuts processing facility located in the Province of Córdoba, (currently Mani del Plata S.A.) from Olam International Ltd. The consideration for this acquisition was USD 10 million to be disbursed in three3 installments, with the first paymentand second payments made at closing. This transaction qualifies as a purchase of assets.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
22. | Disposals and acquisitions (continued) |
In February 2019, the Company acquired two2 dairy facilities from SanCor Cooperativas Unidas Limitada ("SanCor"). The first facility is located in Chivilcoy, Province of Buenos Aires and processes fluid milk while the second facility is located in Morteros, Province of Cordoba and produces powder milk and cheese. Together with these facilities, wethe company also acquired the brands Las Tres Niñas and Angelita. The total consideration for these operations was US$47 million. This transaction qualifies as a purchase of assets.
Disposals
In May 2018,December 2020, the GroupCompany completed the sale of Q45 Negócios Imobiliários Ltda., aGlobal Seward S.L.U. and Peak City S.L.U. wholly owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, which main underlying asset is the Rio De JaneiroHuelen Farm for aat the selling price of US$ 3430.1 million, (Reais 120 million), which was fullyUSD 10.1 million were collected asat closing, an other 10 million during 2021. The balance will be collected by the end of 2022. This transaction resulted in a loss before tax of US$ 0.6 million included in the line item “Other operating income,”and also in the reclassification of Revaluation surplus to retained earnings of US$2.2 million.
In June 2020, the Company collected US$12.1 million in consideration of the datesale of these financial statements.811.70 hectares farm in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina. This transaction resulted in a gain before tax of US$ 222.1 million included in the line item “Other operating income” underand also in the line item “Gain fromreclassification of Revaluation surplus to retained earnings before income tax of US$8.0 million reflected in the saleStatements of farmland and other assets”.changes in shareholders equity.
In June 2018, the Group completed the sale of Q43 Negócios Imobiliários Ltda., a wholly owned subsidiary , which main underlying asset is the Conquista Farm, for a selling price of US$ 18.4 million (Reais 68 million), of which US$ 5.6 million (Reais 21.4 million) has already been collected and the balance will be collected in four annual installments starting in June 2019. This transaction resulted in a gain of US$ 14 million, included in “Other operating income” under the line item “Gain from the sale of farmland and other assets”
In January 2019, we completed the sale of Q065 Negócios Imobiliários Ltda., a wholly owned subsidiary, , which main underlying asset is the Alto Alegre Farm, for a selling price of US$16.6 million (Reais 62.5 million), of which US$2.2 million (Reais 8.4 million) has already been collected and the balance will be collected in seven7 annual installments starting in June 2019.
This transaction resulted in a gain before tax of US$1.5 million, and also in the reclassification of Revaluation surplus to retained earnings of U$S US$8.0 million.
Agreement to acquire rice operations
On December 21, 2021, the Group, through certain subsidiaries, agreed to acquire the rice production operations in Uruguay and Argentina currently owned by certain subsidiaries of Viterra Limited, a third party company. The acquisition is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including the receipt of certain government approvals in Uruguay,
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
21. Disposals and acquisitions (continued)
among others. These conditions have not been satisfied as of the date of these financial statements and therefore the acquisition is not closed.
23.
The terms and conditions of the agreement contemplate the payment, subject to adjustments, of an amount of US$18 million in 3 annual installments and the assumption of existing financial debt for an amount to be finally determined at closing (approximately US$20 million as of the date of these financial statements). The assets acquired will include but are not limited to all biological assets attached to the farms and the rice and rough rice stocks existing at closing. The rice operations are conducted through 4 rice processing and storage plants in Uruguay, 1 rice processing plant in Argentina, and 1 storage plant in Argentina, all of which form part of the agreement.
22. Shareholders' contributions
The share capital of the Group is represented by common shares with a nominal value of US$1.5 per share and one vote each.
|
| | | | | |
| | Number of shares | | Share capital and share premium |
| At January 1, 2017 | 122,382 |
| | 1,120,823 |
|
| Employee share options exercised (Note 24) (1) | — |
| | 50 |
|
| Restricted shares and units vested (Note 24) | — |
| | 4,149 |
|
| Purchase of own shares | — |
| | (32,515 | ) |
| At December 31,2017 | 122,382 |
| | 1,092,507 |
|
| Restricted shares and units vested (Note 24) | — |
| | 4,775 |
|
| Purchase of own shares | — |
| | (13,206 | ) |
| At December 31,2018 | 122,382 |
| | 1,084,076 |
|
| Restricted shares units vested (Note 24) | — |
| | 4,455 |
|
| Purchase of own shares | — |
| | (3,219 | ) |
| At December 31,2019 | 122,382 |
| | 1,085,312 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of shares | | Share capital and
share premium |
| At January 1, 2019 | 122,382 | | | 1,084,076 | |
| | | |
| Restricted shares and units vested (Note 23) | — | | | 4,455 | |
| Purchase of own shares | — | | | (3,219) | |
| At December 31,2019 | 122,382 | | | 1,085,312 | |
| Restricted shares and units vested (Note 23) | — | | | 4,182 | |
| Purchase of own shares | — | | | (3,106) | |
| At December 31,2020 | 122,382 | | | 1,086,388 | |
| | | |
| Restricted shares units vested (Note 23) | — | | | 3,594 | |
| Purchase of own shares | — | | | (55,349) | |
| At December 31,2021 | 122,382 | | | 1,034,633 | |
| |
(1) | Treasury shares were used to settle these options and units. |
(1)Treasury shares were used to settle these options and units.
Decision of the Extraordinary General Shareholders’ meeting
On April 20, 2022 the extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders of the Company resolved to reduce the issued share capital of the Company by an amount of $16,500,000 by the cancellation of 11,000,000 shares with a nominal value of $1.50 each held in treasury by the Company so that, as from April 20, 2022, our issued share capital amounts to $167,072,722.50, represented by 111,381,815 shares in issue (of which 52,254 are treasury shares) with a nominal value of $1.50 each.
Share Repurchase Program
On September 24, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized a share repurchase program for up to 5% of its outstanding shares. The repurchase program has commenced on September 24, 2013 and is reviewed by the Board of Directors after each 12-month period. On August 13, 2019,10, 2021, the Board of Directors approved the extension of the program for an additional twelve-month period, ending September 23, 2020.2022.
Repurchases of shares under the program are made from time to time in open market transactions in compliance with the trading conditions of Rule 10b-18 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and applicable rules and regulations. The share repurchase program does not require Adecoagro to acquire any specific number or amount of shares and may be modified, suspended, reinstated or terminated at any time in the Company’s discretion and without prior notice.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company repurchased 9,117,74717,366,080 shares under this program, of which 3,828,0426,143,349 have been applied to some exercise of the Company’s stock option plan and restricted stock units plan. In 2019, 2018 and 2017 the Company repurchased shares for an amountgrant of US$ 4,263; US$ 15,725; US$ 38,367, respectively. The outstanding treasury shares as of December 31, 2019 totaled 5,295,765.
restricted shares.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
In 2021, 2020 and 2019 the Company repurchased shares for an amount of US$ thousands 66,462; US$ thousands 4,365 and US$ thousands 4,263 respectively. The outstanding treasury shares as of December 31, 2021 totaled 11,285,043.
| |
24. | Equity-settled share-based payments |
Annual Dividend Proposal
On March 11, 2022 the Company’s Board of Directors proposed, for the approval of the Annual General Shareholders' meeting to be held on April 20, 2022, the payment of an annual dividend of $35 million to be paid to outstanding shares in two installments in May and November. This proposal was approved by the Shareholders’ meeting These Consolidated Financial Statements do not reflect this dividend payable.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
23. Equity-settled share-based payments
The Group has set a “2004 Incentive Option Plan” and a “2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan” (collectively referred to as “Option Schemes”) under which the Group granted equity-settled options to senior managers and selected employees of the Group's subsidiaries.subsidiaries with a term of ten years. Additionally, in 2010 the Group has set a “Adecoagro Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan” (referred to as “Restricted Share Plan”) under which the Group grants restricted stock units and restricted shares to senior and medium management and key employees of the Group’s subsidiaries.
(a)Option Schemes
The fair value of the options under the Option Schemes was measured at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation technique.
As of the date of these financial statements all options has already been vested and expensed.
The Adecoagro/ IFH 2004 Stock Incentive Option Plan was effectively established in 2004 and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company. Options are exercisable over a ten-year period. In May 2014 this period was extended for another ten year-period.
Movements in the number of equity-settled options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2004 Stock Incentive Option Plan are as follows:
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | Average exercise price per share | | Options (thousands) | | Average exercise price per Share | | Options (thousands) | | Average exercise price per Share | | Options (thousands) | | Average
exercise
price per
share | | Options
(thousands) | | Average
exercise
price per
Share | | Options
(thousands) | | Average
exercise
price per
Share | | Options
(thousands) |
| At January 1 | 6.66 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 6.66 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 6.66 |
| | 1,641 |
| At January 1 | 6.66 | | | 1,634 | | | 6.66 | | | 1,634 | | | 6.66 | | | 1,634 | |
| | Exercised | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.83 |
| | (7 | ) | Exercised | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| At December 31 | 6.66 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 6.66 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 6.66 |
| | 1,634 |
| At December 31 | 6.66 | | | 1,634 | | | 6.66 | | | 1,634 | | | 6.66 | | | 1,634 | |
Options outstanding at year end under this Plan have the following expiry date and exercise prices:
| | | | Exercise price per share | | Shares (in thousands) | | Exercise
price per share | | Shares (in thousands) |
| Expiry date (i): | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | Expiry date (i): | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| May 1, 2024 | 5.83 |
| | 496 |
| | 496 |
| | 496 |
| May 1, 2024 | 5.83 | | | 496 | | | 496 | | | 496 | |
| May 1, 2025 | 5.83 |
| | 452 |
| | 452 |
| | 452 |
| May 1, 2025 | 5.83 | | | 452 | | | 452 | | | 452 | |
| January 1, 2026 | 5.83 |
| | 142 |
| | 142 |
| | 142 |
| January 1, 2026 | 5.83 | | | 142 | | | 142 | | | 142 | |
| February 16, 2026 | 7.11 |
| | 103 |
| | 103 |
| | 103 |
| February 16, 2026 | 7.11 | | | 103 | | | 103 | | | 103 | |
| October 1, 2026 | 8.62 |
| | 441 |
| | 441 |
| | 441 |
| October 1, 2026 | 8.62 | | | 441 | | | 441 | | | 441 | |
(i) On May 2014, the Board of directorsDirectors decided to extend the expired date of the Plan.
The Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/ 2008 Equity Incentive Plan was effectively established in late 2007 and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company. Options are exercisable over a ten-year period.expired during 2020, with no options excercised.
Movements in the number of equity-settled options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan are as follows:
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
24. | 23. Equity-settled unit-based payments (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Average exercise price per share | | Options (thousands) | | Average exercise price per share | | Options (thousands) | | Average exercise price per share | | Options (thousands) |
| At January 1 | 13.37 |
| | 737 |
| | 13.31 |
| | 851 |
| | 13.07 |
| | 1,658 |
|
| Forfeited | 13.40 |
| | — |
| | 13.27 |
| | (11 | ) | | 13.40 |
| | (4 | ) |
| Expired | 12.82 |
| | (609 | ) | | 12.82 |
| | (103 | ) | | 12.82 |
| | (803 | ) |
| At December 31 | 13.26 |
| | 128 |
| | 13.37 |
| | 737 |
| | 13.31 |
| | 851 |
|
(b)Restricted Share / Restricted Stock Unit Plan
Options outstanding at year-end under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan have the following expiry date and exercise prices:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Exercise price per share | | Shares (in thousands) |
| Expiry date: | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| From Nov 13, 2017 to Aug 25, 2018 | 12.82 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 105 |
|
| January 30, 2019 | 13.40 |
| | — |
| | 595 |
| | 595 |
|
| June 1, 2019 | 12.82 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | 3 |
|
| November 1, 2019 | 13.40 |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | 11 |
|
| From Jan 30, 2020 to Sep 1, 2020 | 13.40 |
| | 97 |
| | 97 |
| | 106 |
|
| From Jan 30, 2020 to Sep 1, 2020 | 12.82 |
| | 31 |
| | 31 |
| | 31 |
|
The following table shows the exercisable shares at year end under both the Adecoagro/ IFH 2004 Incentive Option Plan and the Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/ 2008 Equity Incentive Plan:
|
| | |
| | Exercisable shares in thousands |
| 2019 | 1,762 |
|
| 2018 | 2,371 |
|
| 2017 | 2,485 |
|
| |
(b) | Restricted Stock Unit Plan |
The Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan was effectively established in 2010 and amended in November 2011. It is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company. Restricted shares or units under these Plan vest over a 3-year period from the date of grant at 33% on each anniversary of the grant date. Participants are entitled to receive one common share of the Company for each restricted share or restricted unit granted. There are no performance requirements for the delivery of common shares, except that a participant’s employment with the Group must not have been terminated prior to the relevant vesting date. If the participant ceases to be an employee for any reason, any unvested restricted share or unit shall not be converted into common shares. The maximum number of ordinary shares with respect to which awards may be made under the Plan is 3,982,658,5,379,164, of which 3,896,8093,809,322 have already been grantedvested and 976,2341,396,221 will be vested on future periods. The maximum numbers of ordinary shares are revised annually.
At December 31, 2019,2021, the Group recognized compensation expense US$ 4.86.6 million related to the restricted stock units granted under the Restricted Share Plan (2018:(2020: US$ 4.94.4 million and 2017: US$ 5.64.7 million).
The restricted shares under the Restricted Share Plan were measured at fair value at the date of grant.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
24. | Equity-settled unit-based payments (continued) |
Key grant-date fair value and other assumptions under the Restricted Share Plan are detailed below:
| | | Grant Date | Apr 1, 2017 | | May 15, 2017 | | Apr 1, 2018 | | May 15, 2018 | | Apr 1, 2019 | | May 15, 2019 | Grant Date | Apr 1,
2019 | | May 15,
2019 | | Apr 1,
2020 | | May 12,
2020 | | Apr 1,
2021 | | May 13,
2021 |
| Fair value | 11.88 |
| | 12.14 |
| | 8.43 |
| | 9.10 |
| | 7.00 |
| | 7.20 |
| Fair value | 7.00 | | | 7.20 | | | 5.65 | | | 7.45 | | | 8.36 | | | 8.09 | |
| Possibility of ceasing employment before vesting | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | Possibility of ceasing employment before vesting | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Movements in the number of restricted shares outstanding under the Restricted Share Plan are as follows:
| | | | Restricted shares (thousand) | | Restricted stock units (thousands) | | Restricted stock units (thousands) | | Restricted stock units (thousands) | | Restricted shares (thousand) | | Restricted stock units (thousands) |
| | 2019 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| At January 1 | — |
| | 976 |
| | 969 |
| | 1,000 |
| At January 1 | 1,222 | | | 750 | | | — | | | 174 | | | 508 | | | 976 | |
| Granted (1) | 753 |
| | 20 |
| | 530 |
| | 488 |
| Granted (1) | 1,067 | | | 751 | | | 753 | | | — | | | — | | | 20 | |
| Forfeited | (3 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (25 | ) | | (29 | ) | Forfeited | (32) | | | (24) | | | (3) | | | — | | | (10) | | | (12) | |
| Vested | — |
| | (476 | ) | | (498 | ) | | (490 | ) | Vested | (491) | | | (255) | | | — | | | (174) | | | (324) | | | (476) | |
| At December 31 | 750 |
| | 508 |
| | 976 |
| | 969 |
| At December 31 | 1,766 | | | 1,222 | | | 750 | | | — | | | 174 | | | 508 | |
(1) Approved by the Board of Directors of March 12, 201909, 2021 and the Shareholders Meeting of April 17, 2019.21, 2021.
| |
25. | Legal and other reserves |
24. Legal and other reserves
According to the laws of certain of the countries in which the Group operates, a portion of the profit of the year (5%) is separated to constitute legal reserves until they reach legal capped amounts. These legal reserves are not available for dividend distribution and can only be released to absorb losses. The legal limit of these reserves has not been met.
Legal and other reserves amount to US$ 3,69914,643 as of December 31, 2019 (2018:2021 (2020: US$ 3,664)9,662) and are included within the balance of retained earnings in the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity.
The Company may make distributions in the form of dividends or otherwise to the extent that it has distributable retained earnings or available distributable reserves (including share premium) that result from the Stand Alone Financial Statements prepared in accordance with Luxembourg GAAP. No distributable retained earning result from the Stand Alone Financial Statements of the Company as of December 31, 2019,2021, but the Company has distributable reserves in excess of US$ 935,220.935,111.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
24. Legal and other reserves (continued)
In the other reserves line, it is included the benefit that the Company has regarding ICMS conceded by the government of the Estate of Mato Grosso do Sul. In accordance with the Complementary Law 160/17, grants related to ICMS, conceded by any Estate of Brazil, were considered as Investments Grants. This investment grants will not be computed to calculate income tax, since they were accounted as an Equity Reserve. This reserve cannot be distribute,distributed, unless income tax is paid on the reserve.
25. Trade and other payables
F- 63
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
26. | Trade and other payables |
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Non-current | |
| | |
| Non-current | | | |
| Payable from acquisition of property, plant and equipment | 3,394 |
| | — |
| |
| | Other payables | 205 |
| | 211 |
| Other payables | 284 | | | 290 | |
| | 3,599 |
| | 211 |
| | 284 | | | 290 | |
| Current | |
| | |
| Current | | | |
| Trade payables | 90,594 |
| | 94,483 |
| Trade payables | 151,979 | | | 110,662 | |
| Advances from customers | 2,980 |
| | 3,813 |
| Advances from customers | 8,705 | | | 4,755 | |
| | Taxes payable | 9,086 |
| | 6,457 |
| Taxes payable | 6,866 | | | 7,037 | |
| Payables from acquisition of property, plant and equipment | 3,596 |
| | — |
| Payables from acquisition of property, plant and equipment | — | | | 3,569 | |
| Other payables | 631 |
| | 1,473 |
| Other payables | 1,196 | | | 292 | |
| | 106,887 |
| | 106,226 |
| | 168,746 | | | 126,315 | |
| Total trade and other payables | 110,486 |
| | 106,437 |
| Total trade and other payables | 169,030 | | | 126,605 | |
The fair values of current trade and other payables approximate their respective carrying amounts due to their short-term nature. The fair values of non-current trade and other payables approximate their carrying amounts, as the impact of discounting is not significant.
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Non-current | |
| | |
|
| Senior Notes | 496,564 |
| | 496,118 |
|
| Bank borrowings | 283,638 |
| | 221,971 |
|
| Obligations under finance leases | — |
| | 395 |
|
| | 780,202 |
| | 718,484 |
|
| Current | |
| | |
|
| Senior Notes | 8,250 |
| | 8,250 |
|
| Bank overdrafts | 27 |
| | 2,320 |
|
| Bank borrowings | 179,801 |
| | 132,862 |
|
| Obligations under finance leases | — |
| | 200 |
|
| | 188,078 |
| | 143,632 |
|
| Total borrowings | 968,280 |
| | 862,116 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Non-current | | | |
| Senior Notes | 497,455 | | | 497,009 | |
| Bank borrowings | 208,032 | | | 316,455 | |
| | | |
| | 705,487 | | | 813,464 | |
| Current | | | |
| Senior Notes | 8,250 | | | 8,250 | |
| Bank overdrafts | 11,768 | | | 50,447 | |
| Bank borrowings | 92,146 | | | 98,929 | |
| | | |
| | 112,164 | | | 157,626 | |
| Total borrowings | 817,651 | | | 971,090 | |
As of December 31, 2019,2021, total bank borrowings include collateralized liabilities of US$ 210,525 (2018:70,221 (2020: US$ 268,765)97,999). These loans are mainly collateralized by property, plant and equipment, sugarcane plantations, sugar export contracts and shares of certain subsidiaries of the Group.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
26. Borrowings (continued)
Notes 2027
On September 21, 2017, the Company issued senior notes (the “Notes”) for US$500 million, at an annual nominal rate of 6%. The Notes will mature on September 21, 2027. Interest on the Notes are payable semi-annually in arrears on March 21 and September 21 of each year. The total proceeds nets of expenses was US$495.7 million.
The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain of our current and future subsidiaries. As of the Issue Date, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Adecoagro Brasil Participações S.A., Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A., Pilagá S.A. and Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. are the only Subsidiary Guarantors.
The Notes contain customary financial covenants and restrictions which require us to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020 the Group was in compliance with these financial covenants.
The maturity of the Group's borrowings and the Group's exposure to fixed and variable interest rates is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Fixed rate: | | | |
| Less than 1 year | 104,349 | | | 116,113 | |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 12,503 | | | 52,175 | |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 12,500 | | | 39,844 | |
| Between 3 and 4 years | — | | | 12,500 | |
| | | |
| More than 5 years | 497,455 | | | 497,009 | |
| | 626,807 | | | 717,641 | |
| Variable rate: | | | |
| Less than 1 year | 7,815 | | | 41,513 | |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 5,075 | | | 32,870 | |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 31,754 | | | 6,035 | |
| Between 3 and 4 years | 29,255 | | | 5,154 | |
| Between 4 and 5 years | 71,045 | | | 28,334 | |
| More than 5 years | 45,900 | | | 139,543 | |
| | 190,844 | | | 253,449 | |
| | 817,651 | | | 971,090 | |
Borrowings incurred by the Group’s subsidiaries in Brazil are repayable at various dates between January 2022 and November 2027 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 2.50% to 7.95% per annum or variable rates based on base-rates plus spreads ranging from 5.16% to 14.73% per annum. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020 there are no borrowings subject to LIBOR (six months).
Borrowings incurred by the Group’s subsidiaries in Argentina are repayable at various dates between January 2022 and June 2028 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from —% and 6.2% per annum or variable rates based on LIBOR or other specific base-rates plus spreads of 4.0% for those borrowings denominated in U.S. Dollar, and a fixed interest rates ranging from 34% to 39% per annum for those borrowings denominated in Argentine pesos.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
27. | Borrowings (continued) |
26. Borrowings (continued)
The Notes contain customary financial covenants and restrictions which require us to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions. During 2019 and 2018 the Group was in compliance with these financial covenants.
The maturity of the Group's borrowings (excluding obligations under finance leases) and the Group's exposure to fixed and variable interest rates is as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| Fixed rate: | |
| | |
|
| Less than 1 year | 120,154 |
| | 105,708 |
|
| Between 1 and 2 years | 46,247 |
| | 16,287 |
|
| Between 2 and 3 years | 55,453 |
| | 25,704 |
|
| Between 3 and 4 years | 40,725 |
| | 43,507 |
|
| Between 4 and 5 years | 10,331 |
| | 26,415 |
|
| More than 5 years | 595,550 |
| | 505,456 |
|
| | 868,460 |
| | 723,077 |
|
| Variable rate: | |
| | |
|
| Less than 1 year | 67,924 |
| | 37,724 |
|
| Between 1 and 2 years | 20,007 |
| | 17,278 |
|
| Between 2 and 3 years | 7,197 |
| | 29,861 |
|
| Between 3 and 4 years | 4,692 |
| | 22,886 |
|
| Between 4 and 5 years | — |
| | 18,251 |
|
| More than 5 years | — |
| | 12,444 |
|
| | 99,820 |
| | 138,444 |
|
| | 968,280 |
| | 861,521 |
|
Borrowings incurred by the Group’s subsidiaries in Brazil are repayable at various dates between January 2020 and November 2027 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 7.95% per annum or variable rates based on LIBOR or other specific base-rates plus spreads ranging from 5.47% to 8.33% per annum. At December 31, 2019 LIBOR (six months) was 1.91% (2018: 2.88%).
Borrowings incurred by the Group´s subsidiaries in Argentina are repayable at various dates between January 2020 and June 2024 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 5.68% and 7.50% per annum or variable rates based on LIBOR or other specific base-rates plus spreads ranging from from 4.00% to 4.75% for those borrowings denominated in U.S. Dollar, and a fixed interest rate at 61.00% per annum for those borrowings denominated in Argentine pesos.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
27. | Borrowings (continued) |
Brazilian Subsidiaries
The main loans of the Group’s Brazilian Subsidiaries are:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank | Grant date | Nominal amount | Capital outstanding as of December 31 | Maturity date | Annual interest rate |
| 2019 | 2018 |
| (In millions) | Millions of Reais | Millions of equivalent Dollars | Millions of equivalent Dollars |
| Banco Do Brasil (1) | October 2012 | R$ | 130.0 |
| R$ | 54.2 |
| 13.4 |
| 18.8 |
| November 2022 | 2.94% minus 15% of performance bonus |
| Itau BBA FINAME Loan (2) | December 2012 | R$ | 45.9 |
| R$ | 6.5 |
| 1.6 |
| 3.1 |
| December 2022 | 2.50% |
| Banco do Brasil / Itaú BBA Finem Loan (3) | September 2013 | R$ | 273.0 |
| R$ | 66.3 |
| 16.5 |
| 38.0 |
| January 2023 | 6.83% |
| BNDES Finem Loan (4) | November 2013 | R$ | 215.0 |
| R$ | 83.7 |
| 20.8 |
| 28.6 |
| January 2023 | 3.75% |
| ING Bank N.V. (5) | October 2018 | US$ | 75.0 |
| | — |
| 75.0 |
| 75.0 |
| October 2023 | 6.33% |
| Certificados Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA) | December 2019 | R$
| 400.0 |
| | — |
| 99.2 |
| — |
| November 2027 | 3,8% + IPCA |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank | Grant date | Nominal amount | Capital outstanding as of December 31 | Maturity date | Annual interest rate |
| 2021 | 2020 |
| (In millions) | Millions of
Reais | Millions of equivalent Dollars | Millions of
equivalent
Dollars |
| Banco Do Brasil (FCO) (1) | October 2012 | R$ | 130.0 | | R$ | 17.7 | | 3.17 | | 7.08 | | November 2022 | 2.94% minus 15% of performance bonus |
| Itau BBA (FINAME) (2) | December 2012 | R$ | 45.9 | | R$ | 2.1 | | 0.37 | | 1.40 | | December 2022 | 2.50% |
| Banco do Brasil / Itaú BBA (FINEM) (3) | September 2013 | R$ | 273.0 | | R$ | 26.5 | | 4.75 | | 9.51 | | January 2023 | 7.29% |
| BNDES (FINEM) (4) | November 2013 | R$ | 215.0 | | R$ | 29.5 | | 5.28 | | 10.66 | | January 2023 | 4.63% |
| Certificados Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA) | December 2019 | R$ | 467.0 | | R$ | 467.0 | | 83.68 | | 77.92 | | November 2027 | 3.80% + IPCA |
| Debenture | December 2020 | R$ | 447.0 | | R$ | 447.0 | | 80.10 | | 14.43 | | December 2026 | 4.24% + IPCA |
| ING Bank N.V (5) | October 2018 | US$ | 75.0 | | US$ | — | | — | | 75.0 | | October 2023 | 6.33% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
(1) | Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; (ii) a first degree mortgage of the Sapálio farm; and (iii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment. |
| |
(2) | Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; (ii) a first degree mortgage of the Sapálio farm; and (iii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment. |
| |
(3) | Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen (Santa Agua) farm; (ii) a first degree mortgage of the Sapálio farm; (iii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment; and (iv) long term power purchase agreements (PPA). |
| |
(4) | Collateralized by (i) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment; and (ii) power sales contracts. |
| |
(5) | Collateralized by sales contracts. |
(1)Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen farm; and (ii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment.
(2)Collateralized by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Carmen farm; (ii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment; and (iii) long term power purchase agreements (PPA).
(3)Collateralized by (i) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment; and (ii) power sales contracts.
(4)Collateralized by long term power purchase agreement (PPA).
(5)Canceled during 2021.
In December 2019, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema placed R$400.0 million in Certificados de Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA) adjustable by the IPCA (Brazilian official inflation rate), duematuring in November 2027 and bearing an interest of IPCA (Brazilian official inflation rate) + 3.80% per annum. This debt was issued with no guarantee.
The above mentioned loans, except the CRA, contain certain customary financial covenants and restrictions which require usthe company to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions, as well as restrictions on the payment of dividends. These financial ratios are measured considering the statutory financial statements of the Brazilian Subsidiaries.
During 2019As of December 31, 2021 and 20182020 the Group was in compliance with all financial covenants.
Argentinian Subsidiaries
The main loans of the Group’s Argentinian Subsidiaries are:
|
| | | | | | |
| Bank | Grant date | Nominal amount | Capital outstanding as of December 31 | Maturity date | Annual interest rate |
| 2019 | 2018 |
| (In millions) | (In millions) | (In millions) |
| IFC Tranche A (1) | 2016 | USD 25 | 18.18 | 22.70 | September 2023 | 4.3% per annum |
| IFC Tranche B (1) | 2016 | USD 25 | 14.29 | 21.40 | September 2021 | 4% plus LIBOR |
| Rabobank (2) | 2018 | USD 50 | 50.00 | 50.00 | June 2024 | 3% plus LIBOR |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank | Grant date | Nominal
amount | Capital outstanding as of
December 31 | Maturity date | Annual interest rate |
| 2021 | 2020 |
| (In millions) | (In millions) | (In millions) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Rabobank (1) | 2018 | US$50.0 | 37.50 | 50.00 | June, 2024 | 6.17% |
| IFC Tranche A (2) | 2020 | US$12.6 | 12.35 | 12.60 | June, 2028 | 4% plus LIBOR |
| IFC Tranche B (2) | 2020 | US$9.4 | 9.22 | 9.41 | June, 2028 | 4% plus LIBOR |
(1) Collateralized by a US$ 113 million mortgage over Carmen farm, which is property of Adeco Agropecuaria S.A.
(2) Collateralized by the pledged of the shares of Dinaluca S.A., Compañía Agroforestal S.M.S.A. and BañadoGirasoles del SaladoPlata S.A.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
27. | Borrowings (continued) |
26. Borrowings (continued)
(2) Collateralized by a US$241.8 million mortgage over Carmen,Abolengo, San Carlos, Las Horquertas, and La Rosa farm, which is property of Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. A US$35.7 million mortgage over El Meridiano farm, which is property of Pilaga S.A. and a US$44.3 million mortgage over Santa Lucia farm, which is property of Bañados del Salado S.A.
Loan with International Finance Corporation (IFC)
In June 2020, our Argentine subsidiaries, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.A. and L3N S.A. entered into a US$100 million loan agreement with International Finance Corporation (IFC), member of the World Bank Group. The loan's tenor is eight years, including a two-year grace period, with a rate of LIBOR + 4%. In October 2020, US$22 million has been received. In December 2021, we entered into an amendment reducing the total amount to USD 60 million, that the group could request the withdrawal until June, 2022. If the Company withdraw the full amount, the rate would be reduced to LIBOR + 3%
The loan contains customary financial covenants and restrictions which require us to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions.
The above mentioned loans contain certain customary financial covenants and restrictions which require us to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions, as well as restrictions on the payment of dividends. These financial ratios are measured considering the statutory financial statements of the Argentinian Subsidiaries.
During 2019As of December 31 2021 and 20182020 the Group was in compliance with all financial covenants.
The carrying amount of short-term borrowings is approximate its fair value due to the short-term maturity. Long term borrowings subject to variable rate approximate their fair value.The fair value of long-term subject to fix rate do not significant differ from their fair value. The fair value (level 2) of the notes as of December 31 20182021 and 20192020 equals US$ 460517.3 million and US$ 497528 million, 91.91%103.47% and 99.49%105.65% of the nominal amount, respectively.
The breakdown of the Group´sGroup’s borrowing by currency is included in Note 2 - Interest rate risk.
Evolution of the Group's borrowings as December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 is as follow:
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Amount at the beginning of the year | 862,116 |
| | 817,958 |
| Amount at the beginning of the year | 971,090 | | | 968,280 | |
| | Proceeds from long term borrowings | 108,271 |
| | 45,536 |
| Proceeds from long term borrowings | 30,972 | | | 116,015 | |
| Payments of long term borrowings | (101,826 | ) | | (124,349 | ) | Payments of long term borrowings | (108,425) | | | (34,750) | |
| Proceeds from short term borrowings | 193,977 |
| | 318,108 |
| Proceeds from short term borrowings | 286,115 | | | 207,217 | |
| Payments of short term borrowings | (127,855 | ) | | (190,630 | ) | Payments of short term borrowings | (328,463) | | | (233,540) | |
| Payments of interest (1) | (55,195 | ) | | (47,401 | ) | Payments of interest (1) | (49,592) | | | (57,914) | |
| Accrued interest | 56,943 |
| | 61,186 |
| Accrued interest | 48,791 | | | 52,800 | |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 12,823 |
| | — |
| |
| | Exchange differences, inflation and translation, net | 3,618 |
| | (19,506 | ) | Exchange differences, inflation and translation, net | (52,693) | | | (55,612) | |
| Others | 15,408 |
| | 1,214 |
| Others | 19,856 | | | 8,594 | |
| Amount at the end of the year | 968,280 |
| | 862,116 |
| Amount at the end of the year | 817,651 | | | 971,090 | |
(1) Excludes payment of interest related to trade and other payables.
28.
27. Lease liabilities
Since January 1,2019 the Group mandatorily adopted IFRS 16 (Note 29 and 35.1). | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Lease liabilities | | | |
| Non-current | 201,718 | | | 159,435 | |
| Current | 45,136 | | | 36,337 | |
| 246,854 | | | 195,772 | |
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Lease liabilities | | | |
| Non-current | 174,570 |
| | — |
|
| Current | 41,814 |
| | — |
|
| | 216,384 |
| | — |
|
The maturity of the Group´s lease liabilities is as follows:
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
28. | 27. Lease liabilities (continued) |
|
| | |
| 2019 |
Less than 1 year | 41,813 |
|
Between 1 and 2 years | 46,657 |
|
Between 2 and 3 years | 28,197 |
|
Between 3 and 4 years | 21,160 |
|
Between 4 and 5 years | 18,427 |
|
More than 5 years | 60,130 |
|
| 216,384 |
|
29.The maturity of the Group’s lease liabilities is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Less than 1 year | 45,136 | | | 36,337 | |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 44,847 | | | 20,276 | |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 38,745 | | | 30,228 | |
| Between 3 and 4 years | 30,085 | | | 23,920 | |
| Between 4 and 5 years | 24,072 | | | 19,951 | |
| More than 5 years | 63,969 | | | 65,060 | |
| 246,854 | | | 195,772 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Agricultural "partnerships" | Others | Total |
| Amount at the beginning of the year | 178,423 | 17,349 | 195,772 | |
| Exchange differences | (11,698) | | 51 | (11,647) | |
| Additions and re-measurement | 93,091 | 15,409 | 108,500 | |
| | | |
| Payments | (53,206) | | (9,067) | | (62,273) | |
| Finance cost related to lease liabilities | 15,403 | 1,099 | 16,502 | |
| Closing net book amount | 222,013 | | 24,841 | | 246,854 | |
28. Payroll and social security liabilities
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Non-current | |
| | |
| Non-current | | | |
| Social security payable | 1,209 |
| | 1,219 |
| Social security payable | 1,243 | | | 1,075 | |
| | 1,209 |
| | 1,219 |
| | 1,243 | | | 1,075 | |
| Current | |
| | |
| Current | | | |
| Salaries payable | 3,290 |
| | 3,785 |
| Salaries payable | 2,617 | | | 2,774 | |
| Social security payable | 3,025 |
| | 3,112 |
| Social security payable | 3,499 | | | 2,827 | |
| Provision for vacations | 8,808 |
| | 9,770 |
| Provision for vacations | 8,136 | | | 6,866 | |
| Provision for bonuses | 10,085 |
| | 9,311 |
| Provision for bonuses | 10,799 | | | 10,866 | |
| | 25,208 |
| | 25,978 |
| | 25,051 | | | 23,333 | |
| Total payroll and social security liabilities | 26,417 |
| | 27,197 |
| Total payroll and social security liabilities | 26,294 | | | 24,408 | |
| |
30. | Provisions for other liabilities |
F- 68
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
29. Provisions for other liabilities
The Group is subject to several laws, regulations and business practices of the countries where it operates. In the ordinary course of business, the Group is subject to certain contingent liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings, including those involving tax, labor and social security, administrative and civil and other matters. The Group accrues liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and it can reasonably estimate them. The Group bases its accruals on up-to-date developments, estimates of the outcomes of the matters and legal counsel experience in contesting, litigating and settling matters. As the scope of the liabilities becomes better defined or more information is available, the Group may be required to change its estimates of future costs, which could have a material effect on its results of operations and financial condition or liquidity.
The table below shows the movements in the Group's provisions for other liabilities categorized by type of provision:
| | | | | | | | | Labor, legal and
other claims | | Others | | Total |
| | Labor, legal and other claims | | Others | | Total | |
| At January 1, 2018 | 4,838 |
| | 5 |
| | 4,843 |
| |
| At January 1, 2020 | | At January 1, 2020 | 3,126 | | | 46 | | | 3,172 | |
| Additions | 1,147 |
| | — |
| | 1,147 |
| Additions | 890 | | | 1,449 | | | 2,339 | |
| Used during year | (1,379 | ) | | — |
| | (1,379 | ) | Used during year | (407) | | | — | | | (407) | |
| Exchange differences | (986 | ) | | — |
| | (986 | ) | Exchange differences | (745) | | | — | | | (745) | |
| At December 31, 2018 | 3,620 |
| | 5 |
| | 3,625 |
| |
| At December 31, 2020 | | At December 31, 2020 | 2,864 | | | 1,495 | | | 4,359 | |
| Additions | 527 |
| | 41 |
| | 568 |
| Additions | 917 | | | 3,475 | | | 4,392 | |
| Used during year | (774 | ) | | — |
| | (774 | ) | Used during year | (1,028) | | | (1,455) | | | (2,483) | |
| Exchange differences | (247 | ) | | — |
| | (247 | ) | Exchange differences | (226) | | | (56) | | | (282) | |
| At December 31, 2019 | 3,126 |
| | 46 |
| | 3,172 |
| |
| At December 31, 2021 | | At December 31, 2021 | 2,527 | | | 3,459 | | | 5,986 | |
Analysis of total provisions:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Non current | 2,565 | | | 2,705 | |
| Current | 3,421 | | | 1,654 | |
| | 5,986 | | | 4,359 | |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
30. | Provisions for other liabilities (continued) |
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Non current | 2,936 |
| | 3,296 |
|
| Current | 236 |
| | 329 |
|
| | 3,172 |
| | 3,625 |
|
The Group is engaged in several legal proceedings, including tax, labor, civil, administrative and other proceedings in Brazil, which qualified as contingent liabilities for an aggregate claimed nominal amount of US$ 23.172.1 million and US$ 21.073.7 million as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. These amounts refers to a claim of the tax authorities in Brazil of the exclusion of the calculation base of Income Tax of the accelerated depreciation of rural activity as provided for in article 6 of Provisional Measure 2,159-70 / 01 and in Article 325 of the Income Tax Regulation / 18.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 69
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
31. | Disclosure of leases and similar arrangements |
As explained in note 35.1 above, the Group has changed its accounting policy for leases where the Group is the lessee. The new policy and the impact of the change is described in Note 35.1.
The Group as lessee
Operating leases:
The Group leases land for crop cultivation in Argentina. The leases have an average term of a crop year and are renewable at the option of the lessee for additional periods. Under the lease agreements, rent accrues generally at the time of harvest. Rent is payable at several times during the crop year. Lease expense was US$ 0.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018: US$ 14.0 million; 2017: US$ 6.8 million). Lease expense is capitalized as part of biological assets.
The Group also leases various offices and machinery under cancellable operating lease agreements which involve no significant amount.
The future aggregate minimum lease payments under cancellable operating leases are as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| No later than 1 year | — |
| | 9,082 |
|
| Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years | — |
| | 426 |
|
| | — |
| | 9,508 |
|
Agriculture “partnerships” (parceria by its exact term in Portuguese):
The Group enters into contracts with landowners to cultivate sugarcane on their land. These contracts have an average term of 6 years.
Under these contracts, the Group makes payments based on the market value of sugarcane per hectare (in tons) used by the Group in each harvest, with the market value based on the price of sugarcane published by CONSECANA and a fixed amount of total recoverable sugar per ton. Lease expense was US$ 9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018: US$ 41.10 million; 2017: US$ 38.5 million). Lease expense is included in “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” in the statement of income.
Finance leases:
Most of the leased assets carried in the consolidated statement of financial position as part of a finance lease relate to long-term rental and lease agreements for vehicles, machinery and equipment. Obligations under finance leasing totals US$ 522 and US$ 595 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The Group as lessor
Operating leases:
The Group acts as a lessor in connection with an operating lease related to leased farmland, classified as investment property. The lease payments received are recognized in profit or loss. The lease has a term of ten years.
The following amounts have been recognized in the statement of income in the line “Sales goods and services rendered”:
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
31. | Disclosure of leases and similar arrangements (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Rental income | 564 |
| | 643 |
| | 771 |
|
The future minimum rental payments receivable under cancellable leases are as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| No later than 1 year | — |
| | 32 |
|
| Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years | — |
| | 306 |
|
| | — |
| | 338 |
|
Finance leases:
The Group does not act as a lessor in connection with finance leases.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
32.30. Group companies
The following table details the subsidiaries that comprised the Group as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
| | | | | | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | | | | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | Activities | | Country of incorporation and operation | | Ownership percentage held if not 100 % | | Ownership percentage held if not 100 % | | Activities | | Country of
incorporation
and operation | | Ownership
percentage
held if not
100 % | | Ownership
percentage
held if not
100 % |
| Details of principal subsidiary undertakings: | | | | | |
| | |
| Details of principal subsidiary undertakings: | | | | | | | |
| Operating companies (unless otherwise stated): | | | | | |
| | |
| Operating companies (unless otherwise stated): | | | | | | | |
| Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — | | | — | |
| Pilagá S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 99.94 | % | | 99.94 | % | Pilagá S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 99.94 | % | | 99.94 | % |
| Cavok S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 51 | % | | 51 | % | Cavok S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 51 | % | | 51 | % |
| Establecimientos El Orden S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 51 | % | | 51 | % | Establecimientos El Orden S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 51 | % | | 51 | % |
| Bañado del Salado S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| Bañado del Salado S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — | | | — | |
| Agro Invest S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 51 | % | | 51 | % | Agro Invest S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 51 | % | | 51 | % |
| Forsalta S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 51 | % | | 51 | % | Forsalta S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | 51 | % | | 51 | % |
| Dinaluca S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| Dinaluca S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — | | | — | |
| Simoneta S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| |
| | Compañía Agroforestal S.M.S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| Compañía Agroforestal S.M.S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — | | | — | |
| Energía Agro S.A.U. | (a) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| Energía Agro S.A.U. | (a) | | Argentina | | — | | | — | |
| L3N S.A. | (d) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| L3N S.A. | (d) | | Argentina | | — | | | — | |
| Maní del Plata S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| Maní del Plata S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — | | | — | |
| Girasoles del Plata S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — |
| | — |
| Girasoles del Plata S.A. | (a) | | Argentina | | — | | | — | |
| Adeco Agropecuaria Brasil S.A. | (b) | | Brazil | | — |
| | — |
| Adeco Agropecuaria Brasil S.A. | (b) | | Brazil | | — | | | — | |
| Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. ("AVI") | (b) | | Brazil | | — |
| | — |
| Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema S.A. ("AVI") | (b) | | Brazil | | — | | | — | |
| Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. ("UMA") | (b) | | Brazil | | — |
| | — |
| Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. ("UMA") | (b) | | Brazil | | — | | | — | |
| Monte Alegre Energia Ltda. | (b) | | Brazil | | — |
| | — |
| Monte Alegre Energia Ltda. | (b) | | Brazil | | — | | | — | |
| Adecoagro Energia Ltda. | (b) | | Brazil | | — |
| | — |
| Adecoagro Energia Ltda. | (b) | | Brazil | | — | | | — | |
| Adecoagro Agricultura e Participação Ltda. | | Adecoagro Agricultura e Participação Ltda. | (b) | | Brazil | | — | | | — | |
| Kelizer S.A. | (a) | | Uruguay | | — |
| | — |
| Kelizer S.A. | (a) | | Uruguay | | — | | | — | |
| Adecoagro Uruguay S.A. | (a) | | Uruguay | | — |
| | — |
| Adecoagro Uruguay S.A. | (a) | | Uruguay | | — | | | — | |
| Adecoagro Chile S.P.A | | Adecoagro Chile S.P.A | (a) | | Chile | | — | | | — | |
| Holdings companies: | | | |
| | |
| Holdings companies: | | | | | |
| Adeco Brasil Participações S.A. | — | | Brazil | | — |
| | — |
| Adeco Brasil Participações S.A. | — | | Brazil | | — | | | — | |
| Adecoagro LP S.C.S. | — | | Luxembourg | | — |
| | — |
| Adecoagro LP S.C.S. | — | | Luxembourg | | — | | | — | |
| Adecoagro GP S.a.r.l. | — | | Luxembourg | | — |
| | — |
| Adecoagro GP S.a.r.l. | — | | Luxembourg | | — | | | — | |
| Ladelux S.C.A. | — | | Uruguay | | — |
| | — |
| Ladelux S.C.A. | — | | Uruguay | | — | | | — | |
| Spain Holding Companies | (c) | | Spain | | — |
| | — |
| Spain Holding Companies | (c) | | Spain | | — | | | — | |
(a) Mainly crops, rice, cattle and others.
(b) Mainly sugarcane, ethanol and energy.
(c) Comprised by (1) wholly owned subsidiaries: Kadesh Hispania S.L.U.; Leterton España S.L.U.; Global Asterion S.L.U.; Global Acasto S.L.U.; Global Laertes S.L.U.; Global Seward S.L.U.; Global Pindaro S.L.U.; Global Pileo S.L.U.; Peak Texas S.L.U.; Peak City S.L.U.; Global Neimoidia S.L.U. and 51% controlled subsidiaries; Global Acamante S.L.U.; Global Carelio S.L.U.; Global Calidon S.L.U.; Global Mirabilis S.L.U. Global Anceo S.L.U.Global Hisingen S.L.U.
(d) Mainly dairydairy.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
30. Group companies (continued)
The percentage voting right for each principal subsidiary is the same as the percentage of capital stock held. Issued share capital represents only ordinary shares/ quotas, units or their equivalent. There are no preference shares or units issued in any subsidiary undertaking.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 72
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
32. Group companies (continued)
According to the laws of certain of the countries in which the Group operates, 5% of the profit of the year is separated to constitute legal reserves until they reach legal capped amounts (20% of total capital). These legal reserves are not available for dividend distribution and can only be released to absorb losses. The Group’s joint ventures have not reached the legal capped amounts.
| |
33. | Related-party transactions |
31. Related-party transactions
The following is a summary of the balances and transactions with related parties:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Related party | | Relationship | | Description of transaction | | Income (loss) included in the
statement of income | | Balance receivable
(payable)/(equity) |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Management and selected employees | | Employment | | Compensation selected employees | | (7,883) | | | (5,232) | | | (7,122) | | | (16,198) | | | (15,499) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Related party | | Relationship | | Description of transaction | | Income (loss) included in the statement of income | | Balance receivable (payable)/(equity) |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Directors and senior management | | Employment | | Compensation selected employees | | (5,232 | ) | | (7,122 | ) | | (7,040 | ) | | (15,499 | ) | | (16,353 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Girasoles del Plata S.A (ii) | | Joint venture | | Receivable from related parties (Note 19) (i) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,337 |
|
| | | | | Payables (Note 26) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (194 | ) |
| | | | | Sales of goods | | — |
| | 456 |
| | 2,487 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | Services | | — |
| | 210 |
| | 88 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | Interest income | | — |
| | 242 |
| | 308 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| |
(i) | It includes US$ 8 million of a loan that accruing a 3% interest rate per year with the final maturity in 2022. |
| |
(ii) | Since February 2019, Girasoles del Plata S.A. (formerly CHS Agro S.A.) is fully part of the Group. |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares32. Critical accounting estimates and per share data and as otherwise indicated)judgments
| |
34. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments |
Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Group’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that it believes are reasonable. The Group’s critical accounting policies are discussed below.
Actual results could differ from estimates used in employing the critical accounting policies and these could have a material impact on the Group’s results of operations. The Group also has other policies that are considered key accounting policies, such as the policy for revenue recognition. However, these other policies, which are discussed in the notes to the Group’s financial statements, do not meet the definition of critical accounting estimates, because they do not generally require estimates to be made or judgments that are difficult or subjective.
(a)Impairment of non-financial assets
At the date of each statement of financial position, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets could have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independently, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. The Group’s property, plant and equipment items generally do not generate independent cash flows.
In the case of Goodwill, any goodwill acquired is allocated to the cash-generating unit (‘CGU’) expected to benefit from the business combination. CGU to which goodwill is allocated is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the CGU may be impaired. The carrying amount of the CGU is compared to its recoverable amount, which is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and the value in use. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The impairment review requires management to undertake certain significant judgments, including estimating the recoverable value of the CGU to which goodwill is allocated, based on either fair value less costs-to-sell or the value-in-use, as appropriate, in order to reach a conclusion on whether it deems the goodwill is impaired or not.
For purposes of the impairment testing, each CGU represents the smallest identifiable group of assets that generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or group of assets.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
32. Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued)
Farmlands may be used for different activities that may generate independent cash flows. Those farmlands that are used for more than one segment activity (i.e. crops and cattle or rental income), the farmland is further subdivided into two or more CGUs, as appropriate, for purposes of impairment testing. For its properties in Brazil, management identified a farmland together with its related mill as separate CGUs. Most of the farmlands in Argentina and Uruguay are treated as single CGUs.
Based on these criteria, management identified a total amount of 39 CGUs as of September 30, 2021 and 40 CGUs as of September 30, 2019 and 37 CGUs as of September 30, 2018.2020.
As of September 30, 20192021 and 2018,2020, due to the fact that there were no impairment indicators, the Group only tested those CGUs with allocated goodwill in Argentina and Brazil.
CGUs tested based on a fair-value-less-costs-to-sell model at September 30, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
As of September 30, 2019,2021, the Group identified 1211 CGUs in Argentina (2018: 11(2020: 12 CGUs) to be tested based on this model (all CGUs with allocated goodwill). Estimating the fair value less costs-to-sell is based on the best information available, and refers to the amount at which the CGU could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. Management may be assisted by the work of external advisors. When using this model, the Group applies the “sales comparison approach” as its method of valuing most properties, which relies on results of sales of similar agricultural properties to estimate the value of the CGU. This approach is based on the theory that the fair value of a property is directly related to the selling prices of similar properties.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
34. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued) |
Fair values are determined by extensive analysis which includes current and potential soil productivity of the land (the ability to produce crops and maintain livestock) projected margins derived from soil use, rental value obtained for soil use, if applicable, and other factors such as climate and location. Farmland ratings are established by considering such factors as soil texture and quality, yields, topography, drainage and rain levels. Farmland may contain farm outbuildings. A farm outbuilding is any improvement or structure that is used for farming operations. Outbuildings are valued based on their size, age and design.
Based on the factors described above, each farm property is assigned different soil classifications for the purposes of establishing a value, Soil classifications quantify the factors that contribute to the agricultural capability of the soil. Soil classifications range from the most productive to the least productive.
The first step to establishing an assessment for a farm property is a sales investigation that identifies the valid farm sales in the area where the farm is located. A price per hectare is assigned for each soil class within each farm property. This price per hectare is determined based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis mainly described above.
The results are then tested against actual sales, if any, and current market conditions to ensure the values produced are accurate, consistent and fair.
The following table shows only the 1211 CGUs (2018: 11(2020: 12 CGUs) where goodwill was allocated at each period end and the corresponding amount of goodwill allocated to each one:
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
32. Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued)
| | | CGU / Operating segment / Country | | September 30, 2019 | | September 30, 2018 | CGU / Operating segment / Country | | September 30, 2021 | | September 30, 2020 |
| La Carolina / Crops / Argentina | | 162 |
| | 112 |
| La Carolina / Crops / Argentina | | 197 | | | 168 | |
| La Carolina / Cattle / Argentina | | 26 |
| | 38 |
| La Carolina / Cattle / Argentina | | 32 | | | 27 | |
| El Orden / Crops / Argentina | | 175 |
| | 170 |
| El Orden / Crops / Argentina | | 212 | | | 180 | |
| El Orden / Cattle / Argentina | | 6 |
| | 14 |
| El Orden / Cattle / Argentina | | 8 | | | 7 | |
| La Guarida / Crops / Argentina | | 1,158 |
| | 1,149 |
| La Guarida / Crops / Argentina | | 1,407 | | | 1,196 | |
| La Guarida / Cattle / Argentina | | 597 |
| | 937 |
| La Guarida / Cattle / Argentina | | 725 | | | 616 | |
| Los Guayacanes / Crops / Argentina | | 2,145 |
| | 1,449 |
| Los Guayacanes / Crops / Argentina | | 2,606 | | | 2,215 | |
| Doña Marina / Rice / Argentina | | 3,734 |
| | 3,385 |
| Doña Marina / Rice / Argentina | | 4,536 | | | 3,856 | |
| Huelen / Crops / Argentina | | 3,716 |
| | 3,369 |
| |
| Huelen / Crops / Argentina (1) | | Huelen / Crops / Argentina (1) | | — | | | 3,838 | |
| El Colorado / Crops / Argentina | | 1,857 |
| | 1,484 |
| El Colorado / Crops / Argentina | | 2,256 | | | 1,918 | |
| El Colorado / Cattle / Argentina | | 18 |
| | 216 |
| El Colorado / Cattle / Argentina | | 22 | | | 19 | |
| Closing net book value of goodwill allocated to CGUs tested (Note 15) | | 13,594 |
| | 12,323 |
| Closing net book value of goodwill allocated to CGUs tested (Note 15) | | 12,001 | | | 14,040 | |
| Closing net book value of PPE items allocated to CGUs tested | | 162,844 |
| | 179,545 |
| Closing net book value of PPE items allocated to CGUs tested | | 143,064 | | | 161,010 | |
| Total assets allocated to CGUs tested | | 176,438 |
| | 191,868 |
| Total assets allocated to CGUs tested | | 155,065 | | | 175,050 | |
(1) Dispose on December 2020, see Note 21.
Based on the testing above, the Group determined that none of the CGUs, with allocated goodwill, were impaired at September 30, 20192021 and 2018.2020.
CGUs tested based on a value-in-use model at September 30, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
As of September 30, 2019,2021, the Group identified 2 CGUs (2018:(2020: 2 CGUs) in Brazil to be tested based on this model (all CGUs with allocated goodwill). The determination of the value-in-use calculation required the use of significant estimates and assumptions related to management’s cash flow projections. In performing the value-in-use calculation, the Group applied pre-tax rates to discount the future pre-tax cash flows. In each case, these key assumptions have been made by management reflecting
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
34. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued) |
past experience and are consistent with relevant external sources of information, such as appropriate market data. In calculating value-in-use, management may be assisted by the work of external advisors.
The key assumptions used by management in the value-in-use calculations which are considered to be most sensitive to the calculation are:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Key Assumptions | | September 30, 2021 | | September 30, 2020 |
| Financial projections | | Covers 5 years for UMA (*) | | Covers 4 years for UMA (*) |
| | Covers 5 years for AVI (**) | | Covers 7 years for AVI (**) |
| Yield average growth rates | | 0-1% | | 0-1% |
| Future pricing increases | | 1.76% per annum | | 1.76% per annum |
| Future cost decrease | | 0.33% per annum | | 0.33% per annum |
| Discount rates | | 4% | | 7% |
| Perpetuity growth rate | | 1% | | 1% |
|
| | | | |
| Key Assumptions | | September 30, 2019 | | September 30, 2018 |
| Financial projections | | Covers 4 years for UMA (*) | | Covers 4 years for UMA |
| | | Covers 7 years for AVI (**) | | Covers 7 years for AVI |
| Yield average growth rates | | 0-1% | | 0-1% |
| Future pricing increases | | 0,11% per annum | | 0,11% per annum |
| Future cost decrease | | 0,78% per annum | | 3,11% per annum |
| Discount rates | | 7% | | 8% |
| Perpetuity growth rate | | 1% | | 2% |
(*) UMA stands for Usina Monte Alegre LTDA.
(**) AVI stands for Adecoagro VAleVale Do Ivinhema S.A.
Discount rates are based on the risk-free rate for U. S. government bonds, adjusted for a risk premium to reflect the increased risk of investing in South America and Brazil in particular. The risk premium adjustment is assessed for factors specific to the respective CGUs and reflects the countries that the CGUs operate in.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
32. Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued)
The following table shows only the 2 CGUs where goodwill was allocated at each period end and the corresponding amount of goodwill allocated to each one:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CGU/ Operating segment | | September 30, 2021 | | September 30, 2020 |
| AVI / Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | 2,919 | | | 2,815 | |
| UMA / Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | 1,095 | | | 1,056 | |
| Closing net book value of goodwill allocated to CGUs tested (Note 15) | | 4,014 | | | 3,871 | |
| Closing net book value of PPE items allocated to CGUs tested | | 469,434 | | | 494,077 | |
| Total assets allocated to 2 CGUs tested | | 473,448 | | | 497,948 | |
|
| | | | | | |
| CGU/ Operating segment | | September 30, 2019 | | September 30, 2018 |
| AVI / Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | 3,813 |
| | 3,966 |
|
| UMA / Sugar, Ethanol and Energy | | 1,430 |
| | 2,107 |
|
| Closing net book value of goodwill allocated to CGUs tested (Note 15) | | 5,243 |
| | 6,073 |
|
| Closing net book value of PPE items allocated to CGUs tested | | 614,702 |
| | 618,818 |
|
| Total assets allocated to 2 CGUs tested | | 619,945 |
| | 624,891 |
|
Based on the testing above, the Group determined that none of the CGUs, with allocated goodwill, were impaired at September 30, 20192021 and 2018.2020.
Management views these assumptions are conservative and does not believe that any reasonable change in the assumptions would cause the carrying value of these CGU’s to exceed the recoverable amount.
The Company's goodwill and property, plant and equipment balances allocated to the cash generating units with allocated goodwill in Argentina and Brazil were U$S 176155 million and U$S 652468 million, respectivelyrespectively at December 31, 2019.2021.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Group determined that there isare no indicators of impairment.
(b) Biological assets
The nature of the Group’s biological assets and the basis of determination of their fair value are explained under Note 35.11.33.11. The discounted cash flow model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including observable and unobservable
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
34. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued) |
data. Generally the estimation of the fair value of biological assets is based on models or inputs that are not observable in the market and the use of such unobservable inputs is significant to the overall valuation of the assets. UnobservableThese inputs are determined based on the best information available, for example by reference to historical information of past practices and results, statistical and agronomicalagronomic information, and other analytical techniques. The discounted cash flow model includes significant assumptions relating to the cash flow projections including future market prices, estimated yields at the point of harvest, estimated production cycle, future costs of harvesting and other costs, and estimated discount rate.
Market prices are generally determined by reference to observable data in the principal market for the agricultural produce. Harvesting costs and other costs are estimated based on historical and statistical data. Yields are estimated based on several factors including the location of the farmland and soil type, environmental conditions, infrastructure and other restrictions and growth at the time of measurement. Yields are subject to a high degree of uncertainty and may be affected by several factors out of the Group’s control including but not limited to extreme or unusual weather conditions, plagues and other crop diseases, among other factors.
The significant assumptions discussed above are highly sensitive. Reasonable shifts in assumptions including but not limited to increases or decreases in prices, costs and discount factors used would result in a significant increase or decrease to the fair value of biological assets. In addition, cash flows are projected over a number of years and based on estimated production. Estimates of production in themselves are dependent on various assumptions, in addition to those described above, including but not limited to several factors such as location, environmental conditions and other restrictions. Changes in these estimates could materially impact on estimated production, and could therefore affect estimates of future cash flows used in the assessment of fair value (see Note 16).
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
32. Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued)
(c) Income taxes
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Group recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the period in which such determination is made.
Deferred tax assets are reviewed each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment (see Note 10).
(d) Fair value for farmlands and investment property
Property, plant and equipment
Farmlands are recognized at fair value based on periodic, but at least annual, valuations prepared by an external independent expert. A revaluation reserve is credited in shareholders’ equity. The valuation is determined using sales Comparison Approach. Sale prices of comparable properties are adjusted considering the specific aspects of each property, the most relevant premise being the price per hectare (Level 3) (see Note 12).
Investment property
Investment property consists of farmland for rental or for capital appreciation and not used in production or for sale in the ordinary course of business, and it is measured at fair value. The changes of the Fair value, which is based on an independent external expert, impacts the profit and loss of the period, in the line item Other operating income, net (see Note 14).
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
35. Summary of significant33. Significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
Financial reporting in a hyperinflation economy
IAS 29 “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies” requires that the financial statements of entities whose functional currency is that of a hyperinflationary economy to be adjusted for the effects of changes in a suitable general price index and to be expressed in terms of the current unit of measurement at the closing date of the reporting period. Accordingly, the inflation produced from the date of acquisition or from the revaluation date, as applicable, must be computed in the non-monetary items.
In order to conclude on whether an economy is categorized as hyperinflationary under the terms of IAS 29, the Standard details a series of factors to be considered, including the existence of a cumulative inflation rate in three years that approximates or exceeds 100 %.
Considering a significant increaseSince 2018, when cumulative inflation rate in inflation during 2018, whichthree years exceeded the 100% three-year cumulative inflation rate, and that the rest of the indicators do not contradict the conclusion that Argentina shouldthreshold, Argentina’s operations are considered to be considered aunder hyperinflationary economy for accounting purposes. It is agreed that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Argentina is a hyperinflationary economy underpurposesunder the terms of IAS 29 and that as from July 1, 2018,since then, it will applyhas been applied IAS 29 as from that date in the financial reporting of its subsidiaries and associates with Argentine peso as functional currency.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Financial statements of a foreign entity with a functional currency of a country that has a highly inflationary economy, are restated to reflect changes in the general price level or index in that country before translation into U.S. Dollars. In adjusting for hyperinflation, a general price index is applied to all non-monetary items in the financial statements (including equity) and the resulting gain or loss, which is the gain or loss on the entity's net monetary position, is recognized in the income statement. Monetary items in the closing statement of financial position are not adjusted. The Group treated all Argentine subsidiaries as a hyperinflationary economy as all of them have argentine peso as functional currency. The results and financial position of all foreign entities with a functional currency of a country that has a highly inflationary economy are translated at closing rates after the restatement for changes in the general purchasing power argentine peso.
The inflation adjustment on the initial balancesyears 2021, 2020 and 2019 was calculated by means of conversion factor derived from the Argentine price indexes published by the National Institute of Statistics and the year-over-year change in the index was 1.538.1.509; 1.361 and 1.538, respectively.
The main procedures for the above-mentioned adjustment are as follows:
•Monetary assets and liabilities which are carried at amounts current at the balance sheet date are not restated because they are already expressed in terms of the monetary unit current at the balance sheet date.
•Non-monetary assets and liabilities which are not carried at amounts current at the balance sheet date, and components of shareholders' equity are adjusted by applying the relevant conversion factors.
•All items in the income statement are restated by applying the relevant conversion factors. The company has elected not to segregate the impact of inflation over financial results.
•The effect of inflation on the Company’s net monetary position is included in the income statement, in "Other financial results" (Note 9).
•The ongoing application of the re-translation of comparative amounts to closing exchanges rates under IAS 21 and the hyperinflation adjustments required by IAS 29 will lead to a difference in addition to the difference arising on the adoptionapplication of hyperinflation accounting.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35. | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued) |
The comparative figures in these consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements presented in a stable currency are not adjusted for subsequent changes in the price level or exchange rates. This resulted in an initiala difference arising on the adoption of hyperinflation accounting, between the closing equity of the previous year and the opening equity of the current year. The Company recognized this initial difference directly in equity.
| |
35.1 | Basis of preparation and presentation |
33.1 Basis of preparation and presentation
The consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements of the Group have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC). All IFRS issued by the IASB, effective at the time of preparing these consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements have been applied.
The consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention as modified by financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss, biological assets and agricultural produce at the point of harvest and farmlands measured at fair value.
The preparation of consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements are disclosed in Note 34.33.
Description of accounting policies changed during the fiscal-year.
Leases
For fiscal years beginning on January 1st, 2019 and onward the adoption of IFRS 16 - Leases it is mandatory. We disclose herein the new accounting policies that have been applied from January 1, 2019, where they are different to those applied in prior periods.
IFRS 16 was adopted following the simplified approach, without restating comparative. The reclassifications and the adjustments arising from the new lease accounting rules are directly recognized in the opening balance sheet on January 1, 2019.
The Company has adopted IFRS 16 Leases from January 1, 2019, but has not restated comparatives for previous reporting period as permitted under the specific transition provisions in the Standard.
On adoption of IFRS 16, the Company recognized lease liabilities in relation to leases which had previously been classified as ‘operating leases’ under the principles of IAS 17 Leases. In the previous year, the Company only recognize lease liabilities in relation to leases that were classified as "Finance leases" under IAS 17 Leases. For the initial recognition, these liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate as of January 1, 2019.
The adoption of IFRS 16 Leases from January 1, 2019, resulted in changes in accounting policies and adjustments to the amounts recognized in the financial statements.
Right-of-use assets
The total of the right-of-use assets are included under such type in the Statement of Financial Position:
|
| | | | | |
| | Right of use | | Lease liabilities |
| Closing balance as of December 31, 2018 | — |
| | — |
|
| Initial recognition | 204,937 |
| | (204,937 | ) |
| Reclassifications from Trade and other receivables, net | — |
| | 26,794 |
|
| Opening balance as of January 1, 2019 | 204,937 |
| | (178,143 | ) |
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35.1 | Basis of preparation and presentation (continued) |
33.1 Basis of preparation and presentation (continued)
New standards and interpretations not yet adopted
The impact of the adoption of IFRS 16 did not have effect in retained earnings at January 1, 2019.
Initial measurement of lease liability:
|
| | |
| 2019 |
Operating lease commitments disclosed as of December 31, 2018 | 9,508 |
|
Finance leases | 595 |
|
(Less): short-term leases not recognised as a liability | (9,308 | ) |
Add: adjustments as a result of a different treatment | 199,929 |
|
Add: adjustments relating to changes in the index or rate affecting variable payments | 4,213 |
|
Initial recognition of lease liability | 204,937 |
|
According with the adoption of IFRS 16, theCertain new accounting policystandards and interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for leases is as follows:
Leases are recognized as a right-of-use asset31 December 2021 reporting periods and corresponding liability at the date of which the leased asset is available for usehave not been early adopted by the group. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance cost. The finance cost is chargedThese standards are not expected to profit or loss over the lease period so as to producehave a constant periodic rate of interestmaterial impact on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The right-of-use asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life and the lease term on a straight-line basis.
In determining the lease term, the Company considers all facts and circumstances that create an economic incentive to exercise an extension option, or not exercise a termination option. Extension options (or periods after termination options) are only includedentity in the lease term if the lease is reasonably certain to be extended (or not terminated).current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions.
Short term leases are recognized on a straight line basis as an expense in the income statement.
Accounting as lessee
The Company recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the commencement date33.2 Scope of each lease contract that grants the right to control the use of an identified asset during a period of time. The commencement date is the date in which the lessor makes an underlying asset available for use by the lessee.consolidation
The Company applied exemptions for leases with a duration lower than 12 months, with a value lower than thirty thousand dollars and/or with clauses related to variable payments. These leases have been considered as short-term leases and, accordingly, no right-of-use asset or lease liability have been recognized.
The weighted average lessee’s incremental borrowing rate applied to lease liabilities recognised in the statement of financial position at the date of initial application was 7.06%.
At initial recognition, the right-of-use asset is measured considering:
The value of the initial measurement of the lease liability;
Any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, less any lease incentives; and
Any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee; and
After initial recognition, the right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and/or impairment losses, and adjusted for any re-measurement of the lease liability.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35.1 | Basis of preparation and presentation (continued) |
Depreciation of the right-of-use asset is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated duration of the lease contract.
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at such date, including the following concepts:
Variable lease payments that depend on an index or rate, initially measured using the index or rate as of the commencement date;
Amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees;
The exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option; and
Payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising an option to terminate the lease;
Fixed payments, less any lease incentives receivable;
After the commencement date, the Company measures the lease liability by:
Increasing the carrying amount to reflect interest on the lease liability;
Reducing the carrying amount to reflect lease payments made; and
Re-measuring the carrying amount to reflect any reassessment or lease modifications.
The above mentioned inputs for the valuation of the right of use assets and lease liabilities including the determination of the contracts within the scope of the standard, the contract term ant interest rate used in the discounted cash flow involved a high degree of management´s estimations.
Early adoption of IFRS 3 Amendment
The IASB has issued narrow-scope amendments to IFRS 3,'Business combinations', to improve the definition of a business.
The amended definition emphasizes that the output of a business is to provide goods and services to customers, whereas the previous definition focused on returns in the form of dividends, lower costs or other economic benefits to investors and others.
Entities are required to apply the amendments to transactions for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after 1 January 2020. The Company applied this amendment form the period beginning on 1 January 2019.
Description of accounting policies changed during the previous year.
During the period ended September 30, 2018, the group has adopted the revaluation model for its Farmlands within Property, plant and equipment. Previously, the Company valued all these group of assets under the cost model. These amendments have resulted in an increase of Property, plant and equipment of US$ 545 million. This higher valuation resulted in an increase of the deferred tax liability of US$ 139 million. This change in accordance with IAS 16 is applied prospectively.
Also the Company also adopted the revaluation model for its Investment property. The higher valuation resulted in an increase in Retained earning of US$ 45 million; an increase in Investment property of US$ 40 million as of December 31, 2017and an increase in Deferred tax liability of US$ 12 million.
| |
35.2 | Scope of consolidation |
The consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements include the results of the Company and all of its subsidiaries from the date that control commences to the date that control ceases. They also include the Group’s share of the net income of its jointly-controlled entities on an equity-accounted basis from the point at which joint control commences, to the date that it ceases.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35.2 | Scope of consolidation (continued) |
(a) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date that control commences and deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.
The Group uses the acquisition method of accounting to account for business combinations. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the Group. The consideration transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date.
The Group recognizes any non-controlling interest in the acquiree on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets.
The excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the acquisition-date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
(b) Changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries without change of control
Transactions with non-controlling interests that do not result in loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions – that is, as transactions with the owners in their capacity as owners. The difference between the fair value of any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recorded in equity. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recorded in equity.
(c) Disposal of subsidiaries
When the Group ceases to have control any retained interest in the entity is re-measured to its fair value at the date when control is lost, with the change in carrying amount recognized in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest as an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amount previously recognized in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity is accounted for as if the Group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss.loss, except for the related revaluation surplus which is reclassified to retained earnings.
(d) Joint arrangements
Under IFRS 11, investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and obligations each investor has rather than the legal structure of the joint arrangement.33.3 Segment reporting
The Group has assessed the nature of its joint arrangements and determined them to be joint ventures and value them under the equity method.
Under the equity method of accounting, interests in joint ventures are initially recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognize the Group’s share of the post-acquisition of profits or losses and movements in other comprehensive income, respectively. When the share of losses of an investee equals or exceeds the carrying amount of an investment the Group discontinue applying the equity method, the investment is reduced to zero and does not record additional losses. If the investee subsequently reports net income, the Group would resume applying the equity method only after its share of that net income equals the share of net losses not recognized during the period the equity method was suspended.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35.2 | Scope of consolidation (continued) |
Unrealized gains on transactions between the Group and its joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the joint ventures. Unrealized losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of the joint ventures have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
According to IFRS 8, operating segments are identified based on the ‘management approach’. This approach stipulates external segment reporting based on the Group’s internal organizational and management structure and on internal financial reporting to the chief operating decision maker (the Management Committee in the case of the Company)
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.4 Foreign currency translation
(a) Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). The consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements are presented in US dollars, which is the Group’s presentation currency.
(b) Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are remeasured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the statement of income, in the line Item “Finance income” or “Finance cost”, cost,”as appropriate.
(c) Group companies
The results and financial position of Group entities (except those that has the currency of a hyper-inflationary economy - Argentine subsidiaries) that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
•assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that statement of financial position;
•income and expenses for each statement of income are translated at average exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the rate on the dates of the transactions); and
•all resulting exchange differences are recognized as a separate component of equity.
When a foreign operation is partially disposed of or sold, exchange differences that were recorded in equity are recognized in the statement of income as part of the gain or loss on sale.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate.
33.5 Property, plant and equipment
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35.5 | Property, plant and equipment |
Farmlands are initially recorded at fair value and subsequently under the revaluation model based on periodic, but at least annual, valuations prepared by an external independent expert. A revaluation reserve is credited in shareholders’ equity. All other property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. Historical cost comprises the purchase price and any costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Under the definition of Property plant and equipment is included the bearer plants, such as sugarcane and coffee trees.
Where individual components of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items, which are depreciated separately.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of income when they are incurred.
The depreciation methods and periods used by the group are disclosed in Note 12.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 78
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.5 Property, plant and equipment (continued)
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognized within “Other operating income, net” in the consolidated statement of income.
35.6
33.6 Investment property
Investment property consists of farmland for rental or for capital appreciation and not used in production or for sale in the ordinary course of business, and it is measured at fair value net of any impairment losses if any.value. The changes of the Fair value, which is based on an independent external expert, impacts the profit and loss of the period, in the line item Other operating income, net.
33.7 Leases
As explainedLeases are recognized as a right-of-use asset and corresponding liability at the date of which the leased asset is available for use by the group. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance cost. The finance cost is charged to profit or loss over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The right-of-use asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life and the lease term on a straight-line basis.
In determining the lease term, the Company considers all facts and circumstances that create an economic incentive to exercise an extension option, or not exercise a termination option. Extension options (or periods after termination options) are only included in note 35.1 above, the Group has changed its accounting policylease term if the lease is reasonably certain to be extended (or not terminated).
Short term leases are recognized on a straight line basis as an expense in the income statement.
Accounting as lessee
The Company recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the commencement date of each lease contract that grants the right to control the use of an identified asset during a period of time. The commencement date is the date in which the lessor makes an underlying asset available for leases where the Group isuse by the lessee. The new policyCompany applied exemptions for leases with a duration lower than 12 months, with a value lower than 30000 dollars and/or with clauses related to variable payments. These leases have been considered as short-term leases and, accordingly, no right-of-use asset or lease liability have been recognized.
At initial recognition, the impactright-of-use asset is measured considering:
•The value of the change is described in Note 35.1. Until December 31, 2018 the Group classified its leases at the inception as finance or operating leases. Leases were classified as finance leases whenever the termsinitial measurement of the lease transfer substantially allliability;
•Any lease payments made at or before the riskscommencement date, less any lease incentives; and rewards
•Any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee; and
After initial recognition, the right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and/or impairment losses, and adjusted for any re-measurement of ownership to the lessee. All other leases were classified as operating leases and charged tolease liability.
Depreciation of the statements of income in aright-of-use asset is calculated using the straight-line basismethod over the periodestimated duration of the lease. Finance leases are capitalizedlease contract.
The lease liability is initially measured at the lease’s inception at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. payments that are not paid at such date, including the following concepts:
•Variable lease payments that depend on an index or rate, initially measured using the index or rate as of the commencement date;
•Amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees;
•The corresponding rental obligations, netexercise price of finance charges, were includeda purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option; and
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as “Borrowings”. From 2019 onwards, leases are accounted underotherwise indicated)
33.7 Leases (continued)
•Payments of penalties for terminating the IFRS 16.lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising an option to terminate the lease;
•Fixed payments, less any lease incentives receivable;
After the commencement date, the Company measures the lease liability by:
•Increasing the carrying amount to reflect interest on the lease liability;
•Reducing the carrying amount to reflect lease payments made; and
•Re-measuring the carrying amount to reflect any reassessment or lease modifications.
The above mentioned inputs for the valuation of the right of use assets and lease liabilities including the determination of the contracts within the scope of the standard, the contract term ant interest rate used in the discounted cash flow involved a high degree of management’s estimations.
33.8 Goodwill
Goodwill represents future economic benefits arising from assets that are not capable of being individually identified and separately recognized by the Group on an acquisition. Goodwill on acquisition is initially measured at cost. being the excess of the consideration over the fair value of the Group’s share of net assets of the acquired subsidiary undertaking at the acquisition date. Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. It is allocated to those cash generating units expected to benefit from the acquisition for the purpose of impairment testing. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries isais included within “Intangible assets” on the statement of financial position. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of foreign entities is treated as an asset of the foreign entity denominated in the local currency and translated at the closing rate.
Goodwill is not amortized but tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if there is an indication of impairment (see Note 3433 (a)). Gains and losses on the disposal of a Group entity include any goodwill relating to the entity sold (see Note 35.10)33.10).
33.9 Other intangible assets
F- 84
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35.9 | Other intangible assets |
Other intangible assets that are acquired by the Group, which have finite useful lives, are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses, if any. These intangible assets comprise mainly trademarks and computer software and are amortized in the statement of income on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives estimated to be 10 to 20 years and 3 to 5 years, respectively.
35.1033.10 Impairment of assets
Goodwill
The Company conducts an impairment test annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows, known as cash-generating units. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than its carrying amount, , the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the cash generating unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro-rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset may in the unit. Impairment losses recognized for goodwill cannot be reversed in a subsequent period. Recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In determining the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted (see Note 3433 (a) for details).
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.10 Impairment of assets (continued)
Property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets
At each statement of financial position date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets which have finite lives to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
If the recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, that carrying amount is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized immediately in the statement of income.
Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset or cash-generating unit is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, not to exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset or cash-generating unit in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in the statement of income.
33.11 Biological assets
Biological assets comprise growing crops (mainly corn, wheat, soybeans, sunflower peanuts and rice), sugarcane, coffee and livestock (growing herd and cattle for dairy production).
The Group distinguishes between consumable and bearer biological assets, and between mature and immature biological assets. “Consumable” biological assets are those assets that may be harvested as agriculture produce or sold as biological assets, for example livestock intended for dairy production. “Bearer” biological assets are those assets capable of producing more than one harvest, for example sugarcane or livestock from which raw milk is produced. “Mature” biological assets are those that have attained harvestable specifications (for consumable biological assets) or are able to sustain regular harvests (for bearer biological assets). “Immature” biological assets are those assets other than mature biological assets.
Costs are capitalized as biological assets if, and only if, (a) it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity, and (b) the cost can be measured reliably. The Group capitalizes costs such as: planting, harvesting, weeding, seedlings, irrigation, agrochemicals, fertilizers and a systematic allocation of fixed and variable production overheads that are directly attributable to the management of biological assets, among others. Costs that are expensed as incurred include administration and other general overhead and unallocated production overhead, among others.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35.11 | Biological assets (continued) |
Biological assets, both at initial recognition and at each subsequent reporting date, are measured at fair value less costs to sell, except where fair value cannot be reliably measured. Cost approximates fair value when little biological transformation has taken place since the costs were originally incurred or the impact of biological transformation on price is not expected to be material.
Gains and losses that arise on measuring biological assets at fair value less costs to sell and measuring agricultural produce at the point of harvest at fair value less costs to sell are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they arise in the line item “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce”.
Where there is an active market for a biological asset or agricultural produce, quoted market prices in the most relevant market are used as a basis to determine the fair value. Otherwise, when there is no active market or market-determined prices are not available, fair value of biological assets is determined through the use of valuation techniques.
Therefore, the fair value of biological assets is generally derived from the expected discounted cash flows of the related agricultural produce. The fair value of the agricultural produce at the point of harvest is generally derived from market determined prices.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 81
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.11 Biological assets (continued)
A general description of the determination of fair values based on the Company’s business segments follow:
Growing crops includng rice:
•Growing crops including rice,rice:
Growing crops, for which biological growth is not significant, are measured at cost, which approximates fair value. Expenditure on growing crops includes land preparation expenses and other direct expenses incurred during the sowing period including labor, seedlings, agrochemicals and fertilizers among others.
Otherwise, biological assets are measured at fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs at initial recognition and at any subsequent period. Point-of-sale costs include all costs that would be necessary to sell the assets
The fair value of growing crops including rice is measured based on a formula, which takes into consideration the estimatedestimate of crop yields, estimated market prices and costs, and discount rates. YieldsEstimated yields are determined based on several factors including location of farmland, environmental conditions and other restrictions and growth at the time of measurement. Yields are multiplied by sown hectares to determine the estimated tons of crops including rice to be obtained. The tons are then multiplied by a net cash flow determined at the future crop prices less the direct costs to be incurred. This amount is discounted at a discount rate, which reflects current market assessments of the assets involved and the time value of money.
•Growing herd and cattle:
Livestock are measured at fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs, with any changes therein recognized in the statement of income, on initial recognition as well as subsequently at each reporting period. The fair value of livestock is determined based on the actual selling prices less estimated point-of-sale costs in the markets where the Group operates.
•Sugarcane:
Sugarcane planting costs form part of Property plant and equipment. The agricultural produce growing on sugarcane is classified as biological assets and are measured at fair value less cost to sell. The fair value of agricultural produce growing on sugarcane depends on the variety, location and maturity of the plantation.
Agricultural produce growing in the Sugarcane, for which biological growth is not significant, is valued at cost, which approximates fair value. Expenditure on the agricultural produce growing in the sugarcane consists mainly of labor, agrochemicals and fertilizers among others. When it has attained significant biological growth, it is measured at fair value through a discounted cash flow model. RevenuesEstimated revenues are based on estimated yearly production volume (which will be destined to sugar, ethanol, energy and raw cane production) and the price is calculated as the average of daily prices for sugar future contracts (Sugar #11 ICE-NY contracts) for a six months period. Projected costs include maintenance and land leasing among others. These estimates are discounted at an appropriate discount rate.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
Inventories comprise of raw materials, finished goods (including harvested agricultural produce and manufactured goods) and others.
Harvested agricultural produce (except for rice and milk) are measured at net realizable value until the point of sale because there is an active market in the produce, there is a negligible risk that the produce will not be sold and there is a well-established practice in the industry carrying the inventories at net realizable value. Changes in net realizable value are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they arise under the line item “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest”.
All other inventories (including rice and milk) are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the weighted average method.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.13 Financial assets
Financial assets are classified in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss and at amortized cost, namely loans and receivables. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition (see Note 18)17).
(a) Recognition and measurement
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value and transaction costs are expensed in the statement of income. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans and receivables are subsequently carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the “financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” category are presented in the statement of income within “Other operating income, net” in the period in which they arise.
If the market for a financial asset is not active (and for unlisted securities), the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm’s length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models, making maximum use of market inputs and relying as little as possible on entity-specific inputs.
The Group assesses at each statement of financial position date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. Impairment testing of trade receivables is described in Note 35.15.33.15.
(b) Offsetting financial instruments
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the statement of financial position when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. This right must not be contingent on future events and must be enforceable in any case.
| |
35.14 | Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities |
33.14 Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities
Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value. Commodity future contract fair values are computed with reference to quoted market prices on
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
35.14 Derivative financial instruments (continued)
future exchanges markets. The fair values of commodity options are calculated using year-end market rates together with common option pricing models. The fair value of interest rate swaps has been calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis.
The Group manages exposures to financial and commodity risks using hedging instruments that provide the appropriate economic outcome. The principal hedging instruments used may include commodity future contracts, put and call options, foreign exchange forward contracts and interest rate swaps. The Group does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.14 Derivative financial instruments (continued)
The Group’s policy is to apply hedge accounting to hedging relationships where it is both permissible under IFRS 9, practical to do so and its application reduces volatility, but transactions that may be effective hedges in economic terms may not always qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS 9. Any derivatives that the Group holds to hedge these exposures are classified as “held for trading” and are shown in a separate line on the face of the statement of financial position. The method of recognizing gains or losses on derivatives depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged. Gains and losses on commodity derivatives are classified within “Other operating income, net”. Gains and losses on interest rate and foreign exchange rate derivatives are classified within ‘Financial results, net’. The Group designates certain derivatives as hedges of the foreign currency risk associated with highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedge).
The Group documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedging transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the instruments that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of hedged items.
Cash flow hedge
The effective portion of the gain or loss on the instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognized in other comprehensive income. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the statement of income within "Finance income” or “Finance cost”, cost,”as appropriate.
Amounts accumulated in equity are reclassified to profit or loss in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss. The gain or loss relating to the effective portion is recognized in the statement of income within "Finance income” or “Finance cost”, as appropriate.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognized when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognized in the statement of income. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately transferred to the statement of income.
| |
35.15 | Trade and other receivables and trade and other payables |
F- 84
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.15 Trade and other receivables and trade and other payables
Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. In the case of receivables, less allowance for trade receivables.
The group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses which uses a lifetime expected loss allowance for all trade receivables. To measure the expected credit losses, trade receivables have been grouped based on shared credit risk characteristics and the days past due.
| |
35.16 | Cash and cash equivalents |
33.16 Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. In the statements of cash flows, interest paid is presented within financing cash flows and interest received is presented within investing activities.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
Borrowings are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Borrowing costs are capitalized during the period of time that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use.
33.18 Provisions
Provisions are recognized when (i) the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; (ii) it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and (iii) a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made. Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation.
35.1933.19 Onerous contracts
The Group enters into contracts, which require the Group to sell commodities in accordance with the Group's expected sales. These contracts do not qualify as derivatives. These contracts are not recognized until at least one of the parties has performed under the agreement. However, when the contracts are onerous, the Group recognizes the present obligation under the contracts as a provision included within “Provision and other liabilities” in the statement of financial position. Losses under these onerous contracts are recognized within “Other operating income, net” in the statement of income.
| |
35.20 | Current and deferred income tax |
33.20 Current and deferred income tax
The Group’s tax benefit or expense for each year comprises the charge for current tax payable and deferred taxation attributable to the Group’s operating subsidiaries. Tax is recognized in the statement of income, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in equity.
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted at the date of the statement of financial position in the countries where the Group’s subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. interpretation and considers whether it is probable that a taxation authority will accept an uncertain tax treatment. The Group measures its tax balances either based on the most likely amount or the expected value, depending on which method provides a better prediction of the resolution of the uncertainty. It establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.20 Current and deferred income tax (continued)
Deferred income tax is recognized, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) effective in the countries where the Group’s subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income.
Deferred income tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.
Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The Group is able to control the timing of dividends from its subsidiaries and hence does not expect to remit overseas earnings in the foreseeable future in a way that would result in a charge to taxable profit. Hence deferred tax is recognized in respect of the retained earnings of overseas subsidiaries only to the extent that, at the date of the statement of financial position, dividends have been accrued as receivable or a binding agreement to distribute past earnings in future has been entered into by the subsidiary.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
35.2133.21 Revenue Recognition
The Group’s primary activities comprise agricultural and agro-industrial activities.
The Group’s agricultural activities comprise growing and selling agricultural produce. In accordance with IAS 41 “Agriculture”, cattle are measured at fair value with changes therein recognized in the statement of income as they arise. Agricultural produce is measured at net realizable value with changes therein recognized in the statement of income as they arise. Therefore, sales of agricultural produce and cattle generally do not generate any separate gains or losses in the statement of income.
The Group’s agro-industrial activities comprise the selling of manufactured products (i.e. industrialized rice, milk-related products, ethanol, sugar, energy, among others). These sales are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns and allowances, trade and other discounts, and sales taxes, as applicable.
Revenue is recognized when the full control have been transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs and possible return of goods can be estimated reliably, and there is no continuing management involvement with the goods. Transfers of control vary depending on the individual terms of the contract of sale. Revenues are recognised when control of the products has transferred, being when the products are delivered to the customer, having this full discretion over the channel and price to sell the products, and there is no unfulfilled obligation that could affect the customer’s acceptance of the products.
The Group also provides certain agricultural-related services such as grain warehousing/conditioning and other services, e.g. handling and drying services. Revenue from services is recognized as services are provided.
The Group leases owned farmland property to third parties under operating lease agreements. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
The Group is a party to a 15-year25-year power agreement for the sale of electricity which expires in 2042. The delivery period starts in April and ends in November of each year. The Group is also a party to two2 15-year power agreements which delivery period starts in March and ends in December of each year, these two2 agreements will expire in 2024 and 2025, respectively. Prices under all the agreements are adjusted annually for inflation. Revenue related to the sale of electricity under these two2 agreements is recorded based upon output delivered.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
33.22 Farmlands sales
The Group’s strategy is to profit from land appreciation value generated through the transformation of its productive capabilities. Therefore, the Group may seek to realize value from the sale of farmland assets and businesses.
Farmland sales are not recognized until (i) the sale is completed, (ii) the Group has determined that it is probable the buyer will pay, (iii) the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, and (iv) the Group has transferred to the buyer the risk of ownership, and does not have a continuing involvement. Gains from “farmland sales” are included in the statement of income under the line item “Other operating income, net”.
33.23 Assets held for sale and discontinued operations
F- 90
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
| |
35.23 | Assets held for sale and discontinued operations |
When the Group intends to dispose of, or classify as held for sale, a business component that represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations, or a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale, it classifies such operations as discontinued. The post tax profit or loss of the discontinued operations is shown as a single amount on the face of the statement of income, separate from the other results of the Group. Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying value and fair value less costs to sell.
Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered through a disposal rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when management is committed to the sale (disposal), the sale (disposal) is highly probable and expected to be completed within one year from classification and the asset is available for immediate sale (disposal) in its present condition. The statements of income for the comparative periods are represented to show the discontinued operations separate from the continuing operations.
33.24 Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, and when dilutive, adjusted for the effect of all potentially dilutive shares, including share options, on an as-if converted basis.
| |
35.25 | Equity-settled share-based payments |
33.25 Equity-settled share-based payments
The Group issues equity settled share-based payments to certain directors, senior management and employees. Options under the awards were measured at fair value at the date of grant. An expense is recognized to spread the fair value of each award over the vesting period on a straight-line basis, after allowing for an estimate of the awards that will eventually vest. The estimate of the level of vesting is reviewed at least annually, with any impact on the cumulative charge being recognized immediately.
| |
35.26 | Research and development |
33.26 Research and development
Research phase expenditure is expensed as incurred. Development expenditure is capitalized as an internally generated intangible asset only if it meets strict criteria, relating in particular to technical feasibility and generation of future economic benefits. Research expenses have been immaterial to date. The Group has not capitalized any development expenses to date.
Adecoagro S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)
34. Information related to COVID-19 pandemic
In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was reported to have surfaced in China and started spreading to the rest of the world in early 2020. The COVID-19 virus is impactinghas impacted economic activity worldwide and poseshas posed the risk that Adecoagro or its employees, contractors, suppliers, customers and other business partners may be prevented from conducting certain business activities for an indefinite period of time, including due to shutdowns mandated by governmental authorities or otherwise adopted by companies as a preventive measure. Given
Both in Argentine and Brazil, governments adopted social distancing measures, and shutdowns, that affected economic activities. In our case, activities pursued by our Argentine subsidiaries, related to agricultural production, distribution and commercialization, were exempted from the uncertainty aroundMandatory Isolation Regime for being considered “essential” activities. Also our activities in Brazil have no restrictions. Thus, the extent and timingactivity of the future spread of COVID-19 and the imposition or relaxation of protective measures, it isCompany has not possible to predict the COVID-19’s effects on the industry, generally, and to reasonably estimate the financial effect on the Company. suffered any severe effect.
As of the date of this annual report, impulsed by the vaccination path, almost all restrictions were lifted.
The Company didis closely monitoring the situation and taking all necessary measures at its disposal to preserve human life and its operation.
The Company has enacted prevention and action protocols tailored for each facility and activity, in addition to constituting crises committees to monitor the Company’s response to the pandemic.
Measures taken include but are not identify any situation that could affect these financial statements aslimited to: (i) body temperature controls at entrances of December 31, 2019.
each facility and other critical check points, (ii) mandatory distancing in the workplace, (iii) maximum limit of people in the conferences rooms, lunch room and vehicles (iv) sanitary barriers, (v) special protective attire and masks, (vi) mandatory quarantines for those who have been in contact with travelers or with symptomatic persons, (vii) training programs and information about how to prevent the risks of transmission of COVID-19, (viii) hired an infectious disease specialist to further assess on site. Additionally, remote work has been guaranteed for the duration of the pandemic for employees based in central offices, and a rotation scheme has been implemented for administrative employees based in the farms or industrial facilities.
