Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DCWashington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment (Amendment No. 2))

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the RegistrantFiled by a Party other than the Registrant

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:
 Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional MaterialsSoliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
image_0.jpg
HP Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)


HP INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY):
 No fee required.
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
0-11
(1)






photo_coverbw.jpg


Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)
Message from the Chief Executive Officer
Dear Stockholders:
Aggregate number
When I took over as CEO three years ago, I outlined a strategic plan to accelerate value creation and position our business for long-term sustainable growth.
Soon after, we transformed our global operating model to better serve our customers. We invested in innovation to further strengthen our core business while beginning to expand our portfolio into attractive adjacencies. We made significant investments in our IT infrastructure to become a more digital company. And we announced a three-year value creation plan, including a commitment to return $16 billion of securitiescapital to which transaction applies:our stockholders.
Our team executed well against these priorities—and HP is a much stronger company today as a result. We exceeded each of the key targets set in our value creation plan, while significantly reducing our structural costs and strengthening our position in key growth areas.
Of course, we also navigated a volatile and complex macro environment. And as we have faced challenges, we have embraced them as opportunities to improve our performance.
This is exactly what we did in 2022, and it’s what you can expect from us moving forward. Because as far as we have come as a company, we see significant opportunities ahead to build on our progress and create value for our customers, shareholders and other stakeholders.
Fiscal Year 2022 Highlights
We delivered solid results in 2022 – with revenue of $63 billion – even in the face of tough market conditions that worsened in the second half of the year.
Importantly, our key growth businesses each delivered double-digit organic growth. And we continued to build a more growth-oriented portfolio through M&A with the completion of our acquisition of Poly.
We generated non-GAAP free cash flow1 of $3.9 billion, while returning $5.3 billion to shareholders in the form of share repurchases and dividends.
And we continued to differentiate HP as one of the world’s most trusted brands. This is a key competitive advantage in the market, as more customers make purchasing decisions based on our commitment to climate action, human rights, diversity, equity and inclusion, and digital equity. Our efforts garnered widespread recognition, including the “100 Most Sustainable Companies” by Barron’s, “Best Workplaces for Women” by Fortune, “America’s Most Just Companies” by JUST Capital and CNBC and, for the fourth consecutive year, “America’s Most Responsible Company” by Newsweek.
Our Next Phase of Growth
As we look toward the future, our sights are set on unlocking our next phase of value creation and growth.
That’s why, last November, we announced our Future Ready plan. It’s designed to develop the portfolio and operational capabilities needed to win in our markets and further reduce our structural costs. We expect to generate at least $1.4 billion in gross annualized run rate savings by the end of our 2025 fiscal year, helping us to mitigate near-term headwinds while maintaining investments in long-term growth.
Future Ready Portfolio
A key area of investment is focused on building a more growth-oriented portfolio. We see significant opportunity to drive long-term growth across our Gaming, Hybrid Systems, Workforce Services & Solutions, Consumer Subscriptions, and Industrial Graphics and 3D businesses. And we are focused on segments of the market where we can drive significant competitive advantage and meet a wider range of customer needs.
pg1-pic_lorese.jpg
icon_quote.jpg
The progress we have made over the past three years gives me confidence in the direction we are heading.”
1Non-GAAP free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please refer to “Reconciliation of GAAP Measures to Non-GAAP Measures” on page 90 for a description and reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure relative to the reported GAAP financial measure.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT1


Hybrid work is a great example. We believe our HP and Poly portfolio, combined with our expansion in software and services, will help create entirely new customer experiences and expand our addressable market. We have an equally attractive opportunity to scale our services and subscriptions offerings. There is growing demand for new consumption models, and last year we created a dedicated business unit focused on building lifetime customer relationships and driving recurring revenue.
To help fund investments in our growth areas, we are simplifying our portfolio and zeroing in on businesses where we can drive significant competitive advantage and market leadership.
Future Ready Operations
As we strengthen our portfolio, we’re supporting it with Future Ready operations.
A big part of this is continuing the process of digitizing the company. Our infrastructure investments have driven greater productivity, speed and efficiency. And this new digital backbone is already improving our execution—from creating a more flexible and resilient supply chain, to further enhancing our customer support and go-to-market capabilities. It is also enabling new customer value propositions, such as personalized services and solutions that are key to our growth strategy.
At the same time, we are driving operational excellence across every facet of our business. In a company of our size, we believe we have opportunities to further improve execution and reduce costs. And we plan to continue optimizing our performance by unlocking efficiencies, simplifying organizational structures, and removing unnecessary spend.
Future Ready HP
The road ahead won’t be easy. At times like these, companies must find ways to navigate through choppy waters while steering their ship toward brighter days.
This is exactly the approach we’re taking at HP—controlling what we can control through disciplined execution and cost management, while reinvesting in our growth priorities and digital transformation.
All of this will be underpinned by our unwavering commitment to the HP Way. Our people, culture and values have long been core to our success—and I continue to believe that how we do things is just as important as what we do. That’s why we’re creating a culture where diverse talent can come to do the best work of their careers while making a positive impact around the world through our Sustainable Impact strategy.
The progress we have made over the past three years gives me confidence in the direction we are heading. And I believe the actions we’re taking to create a Future Ready HP will drive profitable long-term growth and value creation for our stakeholders.
Thank you for the trust you have placed in HP with your investment.


Saludos,
sig_enrique.jpg
Enrique Lores
President and CEO
2
logo_hp.jpg 

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
Message from the Chairman
To our Stockholders:
We are pleased to invite you to attend HP Inc’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Monday, April 24, 2023 at 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time. This year’s annual meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, conducted via live audio webcast.
(5)Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount previously paid:
(2)Form, Schedule
During fiscal 2022, HP delivered solid results in spite of what evolved into a challenging macroeconomic backdrop in the second half of the year. While we foresee potentially challenging times ahead due to the uncertain macroeconomic outlook, the Board remains confident that our CEO, Enrique Lores, and his team will guide HP through this environment, building on their track record of consistently delivering on their commitments. We believe that under their management HP remains well positioned to weather the obstacles ahead, while leveraging our world class talent, IP, and scale to continue capitalizing on key growth opportunities.
Importantly, we have stayed true to HP’s values, with sustainable impact remaining a priority. In 2022, we were the only technology company globally to receive “A” ratings across CDP’s Climate, Forests and Water lists. We continue to make strides in our diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, with women representing 33.3% of HP’s full-time executive positions globally and 46.4% of our U.S. hires in fiscal 2022 being ethnically diverse. For additional information about HP’s sustainability and social initiatives, please refer to “Sustainable Impact” and “Our Approach to ESG” in the accompanying Proxy Statement.
HP also has one of the most diverse boards in the tech industry, with 69% of our members identifying as gender and/or Registrationethnically diverse individuals. In addition, three out of four committee chairs are female. We know that having the right mix of backgrounds, skills, and experience is key to the success and effectiveness of the Board. We believe the skills and experience represented on the Board are matched to HP’s needs as it operates in a dynamic environment in a broad array of markets around the globe. Further details about our directors and HP’s corporate governance policies and practices are included in the accompanying Proxy Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:


under “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors.”

Table of Contents



Table of Contents

Message fromYour vote is important. Regardless of whether you participate in the Chairman

To our Stockholders:

We are pleased to inviteannual meeting, we hope you vote as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy online or by phone, or, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card. Voting online or by phone, written proxy or voting instruction card ensures your representation at the annual meeting regardless of whether you attend the virtual meeting.

For details about how to attend the annual
meeting of stockholders of HP Inc.online, submit questions before or during the meeting, and information on [          ], [   ],
2020the business to be conducted at [          ], Pacific Time, at [          ].


In connection with the annual meeting, please findrefer to the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and 2020 proxy statement, which describe the matters stockholders will consider and vote on.

Importantly, at this annual meeting, you are being asked to vote FOR the 12 world-class director nominees proposed by your Board of Directors, who bring diverse

All of our director nominees are independent, other than Enrique Lores, HP Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and President.Proxy Statement.
All of us have, and will continue to, serve the interests of all HP stockholders and pursue the most value-creating path forward during our tenure.

the way HP works, and we are confident that he will build on HP’s progress and capitalize on new opportunities.

Your vote will be especially important at this annual meeting. As you may have heard, Xerox Holdings Corporation has announced its intent to nominate 12 director candidates to stand for election to the Board at the annual meeting in opposition to the director nominees recommended by your Board. Xerox had previously submitted an unsolicited proposal to acquire HP, which your Board unanimously rejected, and subsequently launched an exchange offer to acquire all outstanding shares of HP common stock. We believe these nominations and related actions are a self-serving tactic by Xerox to advance its proposal that meaningfully undervalues HP and would create significant risk and compromise HP’s future.

“We see significant opportunities to create stockholder value at HP by advancing our leadership, disrupting industries and aggressively transforming the way HP works.”

perspectives, skills and proven experience in advancing HP Inc.’s strategy across Personal Systems, Printing and 3D, and driving sustainable, profitable growth and value creation. Specifically:

Our director nominees have experience in finance and accounting; leading strategic transactions; allocating capital resources across large, complex enterprises; government and public affairs; scientific research, product development and issues management; corporate governance; and international business in key regions where HP operates around the world.

Additional information regarding HP’s director nominees can be found under the heading “Board of Directors” starting on page 8.

The past year was a notable one, marked by a number of transitions, including the appointment of our new Chief Executive Officer, Enrique Lores. The planning and execution of a rigorous and seamless CEO transition is one of the Board’s most important functions. We, as a Board, are extremely proud of the process that was undertaken. Through this rigorous process, Enrique emerged as the Board’s unanimous choice as successor. We see significant opportunities to create stockholder value at HP by advancing our leadership, disrupting industries and aggressively transforming


Proxy Statement3


Table of Contents

Message from the Chairman

Your Board does NOT endorse any Xerox nominee and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of all of the nominees proposed by the Board and named in the accompanying proxy statement and AGAINST the proposal submitted by Xerox to repeal certain provisions of, or amendments to, the Company’s Bylaws adopted after February 7, 2019. Your Board strongly urges you not to vote using any blue proxy card sent to you by Xerox. If you have previously voted using a blue proxy card sent to you by Xerox, you can revoke that proxy and vote “FOR” your Board’s nominees and on the other matters to be voted on at the meeting by following the easy instructions provided on the enclosed WHITE proxy card.

Whether or not you will attend the meeting, we hope that your shares are represented and voted. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares promptly by Internet or telephone by following the easy instructions provided on the enclosed WHITE proxy card, so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

If you have any questions, please contact Innisfree M&A Incorporated, the firm assisting us in connection with the annual meeting. Stockholders may call (877) 750-5838 (toll-free from the U.S. or Canada) or +1 (412) 232-3651 (from other countries). Banks and brokers may call collect at (212) 750-5833.

Thank you for your ongoing support of, and continued interest in, HP Inc.

Sincerely,

sig_berghc.jpg
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
Chairman of the Board
pg2-photo_berghcharles.jpg
icon_quote.jpg
We believe the skills and experience represented on the Board are matched to HP’s needs as it operates in a dynamic environment in a broad array of markets around the globe.”


4www.hpannualmeeting.com


This notice of annual meeting and proxy statement for HP Inc. (“HP” or the “Company”) and the accompanying WHITE proxy card are being first mailed to our stockholders on or about [     ], 2020.

Time and Date
[          ], Pacific Time,
on [          ], [     ], 2020

Place
[               ]

Record Date
[               ], 2020

Voting
Internet
Visit the website provided on your WHITE proxy card or voting instruction form.

Telephone
Use the toll-free phone number listed on the WHITE proxy card or voting instruction form.

Mail
We are encouraging all stockholders to submit their proxies by Internet or by telephone, given the circumstances relating to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). You may also sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card or voting instruction form to the address indicated on the card or form, but we strongly encourage you to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet.

Your vote is extremely important. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares promptly by Internet or telephone by following the easy instructions provided on the enclosed WHITE proxy card or voting instruction form, as applicable.

If you have any questions, please contact Innisfree M&A Incorporated, the firm assisting us in connection with the annual meeting. Stockholders may call toll free at (877) 750-5838, if calling from the U.S. or Canada, or may call +1 (412) 232-3651, if calling from other countries. Banks and brokers may call collect at (212) 750-5833.



Items of Business
Management Proposals
(1)To elect 12 Directors
(2)To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2020
(3)To approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation (“say on pay” vote)
(4)To approve the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”)

Stockholder Proposals
(5)To consider and vote on a stockholder proposal described in this proxy statement, if properly presented at the meeting
(6)To consider and vote on a stockholder proposal submitted by Xerox Holdings Corporation (“Xerox”) to repeal each provision of, or amendment to, the Bylaws adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) without the approval of the Company’s stockholders subsequent to February 7, 2019 and up to and including the date of the annual meeting (the “Stockholder Bylaws Proposal”), if properly presented at the meeting
(7)Such other business as may properly come before the meeting

Please note that Xerox has provided notice to the Company of its intent to nominate a slate of 12 Director nominees (each, a “Xerox nominee” and, collectively, the “Xerox nominees”) for election as Directors at the annual meeting in opposition to the nominees proposed by our Board and present the Stockholder Bylaws Proposal. You may receive solicitation materials from Xerox, including a proxy statement and blue proxy card. We are not responsible for the accuracy of any information provided by or relating to Xerox or its nominees contained in solicitation materials filed or disseminated by or on behalf of Xerox or any other statements Xerox or its representatives may make.

The Board does NOT endorse any Xerox nominee and unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election of all of the nominees proposed by the Board and named in this proxy statement and AGAINST the Stockholder Bylaws Proposal. Our Board strongly urges you not to vote using any blue proxy card sent to you by Xerox. If you have previously voted using a blue proxy card sent to you by Xerox, you can revoke that proxy and vote FOR our Board’s nominees, AGAINST the Stockholder Bylaws Proposal and on the other matters to be voted on at the meeting in accordance with the Board’s recommendations by voting via Internet or by telephone by following the easy instructions provided on the enclosed WHITE proxy card. You may also sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card to the address indicated on the card, but we strongly encourage you to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet.

Admission and Record Date

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on [          ], 2020 are entitled to receive notice of, to attend, and to vote at the meeting. If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please note the admission procedures described under the heading “How Can I Attend the Meeting?” on page 86 of the proxy statement.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT1501 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
(650) 857-15013


Proxy Statement5


Table of Contents

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

This notice of annual meeting, proxy statement and form of proxy for HP Inc. (“HP” or the “Company”) are being distributed and made available on or about February 24, 2023.

We are actively monitoring the public health concerns relating

icon_time.jpg
Time and Date
2:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on
Monday, April 24, 2023
icon_internet1.jpg
Place
Online at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HPQ2023
icon_date.jpg
Record Date
February 23, 2023
Items of Business
Board ProposalsBoard RecommendationPage
1To elect the 13 Directors named in this proxy statement
icon_checkblue.jpg
FOR each
director nominee
13
2To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2023
icon_checklblue.jpg
FOR44
3To approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s named executive officer compensation (“say on pay” vote)
icon_checklblue2.jpg
FOR46
4To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future “say on pay” votes
icon_checklblue3.jpg
ONE YEAR76
Stockholder Proposal
5To consider and vote on a stockholder proposal described in this proxy statement, if properly presented at the meeting
icon_crossgray.jpg
AGAINST79
Such other business as may properly come before the meeting

Voting
Virtual Meeting Admission
Stockholders of record as of February 23, 2023, will be able to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the protocols and recommendations that federal, state, and local governments may impose. Our headquarters are locatedparticipate in the Countyannual meeting by visiting our annual meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HPQ2023. To participate in the annual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice of Santa Clara, California, which on March 16, 2020 announcedInternet availability of the implementation of “shelter in place” orders prohibiting virtually all group gatherings through April 7, 2020. We do not know if these restrictionsproxy materials, proxy card or similar restrictions will remain in place on the dateinstructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you have any questions about your control number, please contact the bank, broker, or other nominee that holds your shares.
The annual meeting will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time. Online check-in will begin at 1:30 p.m., Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures.
Annual Meeting Website
The online format used by HP Inc. for the annual meeting also allows us to communicate more effectively with you. Stockholders can submit questions in advance of the annual meeting. In order to comply with applicable legal restrictionsmeeting, by visiting our annual meeting website at www.proxyvote.com/HP. Stockholders can also access copies of our proxy statement and in order to promote the health and safety of the attendeesannual report at the annual meeting we may take actions including changing the time, date or location of the meeting; conducting the meeting in whole or in part by means of remote communication (including holding a virtual meeting); or imposing additional procedures or limitations on meeting attendees. If we take any of these steps, we will publicly announce them prior to the annual meeting. As always, we strongly encourage you to vote your shares by proxy prior to the meeting, and, further, we strongly encourage you to submit your proxies electronically—by telephone or by Internet— by following the easy instructions on the enclosed WHITE proxy card. Your vote is important, and voting electronically should facilitate the timely receipt of your proxy despite any potential disruptions in mail service due to COVID-19.

website.

Adjournments and Postponements

Any action on the items of business described above may be considered at the annual meeting at the time and on the date specified above or at any time and date to which the annual meeting may be properly adjourned or postponed.

By order of the Board of Directors,
Kim M. RiveraRick Hansen
President, StrategyDeputy General Counsel, Corporate, and Business Management,Corporate Secretary
Internet
Chief Legal Officer and Secretarywww.proxyvote.com/HP
prior to the meeting

Telephone
1-800-690-6903
During the meeting please visit
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/
HPQ2023
Mail
You can vote by mail by requesting a paper copy of the materials, which will include a proxy card. Return the card to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on [          ], 2020.April 24, 2023. The definitive proxy statement and HP Inc.’s 20192022 Annual Report are available electronically at [          ].

www.proxyvote.com/HP.
Your vote is very important. Regardless of whether you plan to virtually attend the annual meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote your shares over the Internet or via a toll-free telephone number. If you received a paper copy of a proxy or voting instruction card by mail, you may submit your proxy or voting instruction card for the annual meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy or voting instruction card in the pre-addressed envelope provided. Stockholders of record and beneficial owners will be able to vote their shares electronically at the annual meeting (other than shares held through the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan, which must be voted prior to the meeting). For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the section entitled “Questions and Answers—Voting Information” beginning on page 81 of the proxy statement.
4
logo_hp.jpg 


6www.hpannualmeeting.com


Proxy Statement Summary

Table

The following is a summary of Contents

certain key disclosures in our proxy statement. This is only a summary, and it may not contain all the information that is important to you. For more complete information, please review the proxy statement as well as our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. References to “HP,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to HP Inc. (formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP Co.”)).

BOARD OF DIRECTORS8
Background to the Solicitation8
Who We Are
Item
1
15
How We Are Selected23
How We Are Organized25
How We Govern and Are Governed30
How We Communicate With You34
How We Are Compensated36
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE39
Management Proposal No. 1
12 of our 13 Director nominees are independent, including six women and six director nominees who identify as racially/ethnically diverse.
Our Board is led by an independent Chairman.
Key information regarding all 13 of our Board nominees is summarized in the table below.
icon_checkb.jpg
The Board recommends a vote FOR each Director nominee
icon_arrowb.jpg
Further information beginning on page 13.
39
Principal Accountant Fees and Services43
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services Policy
Item
3
43
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION44
Management Proposal No. 3
Our Board and the HRC Committee are committed to an executive compensation program that aligns the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. To fulfill this mission, we have a pay-for-performance philosophy that drives decisions regarding executive compensation.
Our compensation programs have been structured to balance near-term results with
long-term success, mitigate risks, and enable us to attract, retain, focus, and reward our executive team for delivering stockholder value.
icon_checkb.jpg
The Board recommends a vote FOR this Proposal
icon_arrowb.jpg
Further information, including an overview of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), beginning on page 46.
44
Vote Required44
Overview
Item
4
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future “Say on Pay” votes
Our stockholders currently have the opportunity to participate annually in an advisory vote on our named executive officer compensation.
The Board believes that annual voting on HP’s executive compensation sets the correct ongoing cadence for dialogue between HP and its stockholders on executive compensation matters.
icon_checkb.jpg
The Board recommends a vote of ONE YEAR for this Proposal
icon_arrowb.jpg
Further information beginning on page 76.
45
Compensation Discussion and Analysis47
Termination and Change in Control Protections
Item
5
58
Management Proposal No. 4 Vote to Approve the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan72
Vote Required72
OWNERSHIP OF OUR STOCK75
Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management75
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS77
This stockholder proposal requests that HP’s Board take such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by stockholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all stockholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting.
icon_crossg.jpg
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this Proposal
icon_arrowg.jpg
Further information beginning on page 79.
77
Proposal 2023 PROXY STATEMENT5 – Right to Act by Written Consent


Proxy Statement Summary
7


Business Highlights

Table of Contents

Background to the Solicitation

HP Inc. (“HP” oris a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, solutions, and services. We sell to individual consumers, small- and medium-sized businesses and large enterprises, including customers in the “Company”) evaluatesgovernment, health, and education sectors. We have three reportable segments: Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments. The Personal Systems segment offers commercial and consumer desktops and notebooks, workstations, thin clients, commercial mobility devices, retail point of sale systems, displays, hybrid systems (including video conferencing solutions, cameras, headsets, voice and related software capabilities), software, support and services. The Printing segment provides consumer and commercial printer hardware, supplies, solutions and services. Corporate Investments include certain business incubation and investment projects.

For our overall strategy, our priorities are strengthening our core, accelerating in adjacencies, disrupting new markets, driving digital transformation and delivering long term sustainable growth. We are focused on advancing our leadership in our core personal systems and printing markets, while continuing to modernize these businesses to excel in the hybrid world. We plan to invest in additional growth areas where our brand and IP provide a competitive advantage to disrupt industries. We strive to transform how we work and to become a more digitally powered and data enabled company, and significantly reduce structural costs. We have an ongoing basis its business strategy, capital allocation,incredible channel network, passionate employees and potential strategic alternativesa culture committed to being Future Ready.
Building a Stronger HP
pg6-gfx_buildastronger.jpg
pg5_photobusinesshighlight.jpg
6
logo_hp.jpg 

Proxy Statement Summary
FY22 performance highlights
Net revenue
$5.5 billion
non-GAAP operating profit1
By key segment and business unit
pg6_piechrtperfhighlights.jpg
$3.9 billion
non-GAAP free cash flow1
Scale and Reach
icon_marketleader.jpg
icon_innovationip.jpg
icon_scale.jpg
Market leader
#1 or #2
In either Print or PC
in 48 countries
2
Innovation & IP
28k+
Patents
Scale
185/58k
Countries/Employees
3
hokkaido_sanddollar24.jpg
(1)Non-GAAP operating profit and non-GAAP free cash flow are non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to “Reconciliation of GAAP Measures to Non-GAAP Measures” on page 90 for a description and reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures relative to reported GAAP financial measures.
(2)Source: IDC Worldwide Quarterly Hardcopy Peripherals Tracker, Q3 2022 and IDC Worldwide Quarterly Personal Computing Device Tracker, Q3 2022.
(3)As of October 31, 2022.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT7

Proxy Statement Summary
Key Growth Areas
pg7_photogaming.jpg
pg7_photoperipherals.jpg
pg7_photoconsumerservice.jpg
GamingHybrid SystemsConsumer Subscriptions
pg7_photo3dprinting.jpg
pg7_photoworkforce.jpg
Industrial Graphics
and 3D
Workforce Services and Solutions
Future Ready
pg7_futureready.jpg

Enabling increased investment in an effortour key growth areas to drive shareholder value. This evaluationlong term value creation by the end of fiscal 2025
Digital Transformation
Portfolio Optimization
Operational Excellence

8
logo_hp.jpg 

Proxy Statement Summary
Sustainable Impact
At HP, we believe how we do things is iterative,just as important as what we do. Through our Sustainable Impact program, we incorporate efforts to tackle key issues in Climate, Human Rights, and takes into accountDigital Equity.
Our strategy
chart_sustainableimpact1.jpg
chart_sustainableimpact2.jpg
chart_sustainableimpact.jpg
Climate action
Drive toward a net zero carbon, fully regenerative economy while engineering a sustainable portfolio of products and solutions.
Human rights
Create a powerful culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Advance human rights, social justice, and racial and gender equality across our ecosystem.
Digital equity
Lead in activating and innovating holistic solutions that break down the digital divide that prevents many from accessing the education, jobs, and healthcare needed to thrive. Drive digital inclusion to transform lives and communities.
photo_field.jpg
photo_com.jpg
photo_desk.jpg
For more information about our Sustainable Impact agenda, and to reach our annual Sustainable Impact Report, please see the Sustainability section of our website at https://www.hp.com/us-en/hp-information/sustainable-impact.html (which is not incorporated by reference herein).
Our Sustainable Impact Report includes disclosures aligned with the following ESG frameworks: Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), and the World Economic Forum International Business Council (WEF IBC).
The Board and its committees actively oversee HP’s Sustainable Impact, strategy and related risks. For information regarding the Board’s role in overseeing HP’s Sustainable Impact, please refer to “Spotlight on Board Oversight of ESG” on page 34.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT9

Proxy Statement Summary
Recognition
pg10-logo_newsweeklist.jpg
pg10-logo_2021cdp.jpg
pg9-logo_global100.jpg
Ranked 1st in America for environmental, social and governance performance for the 4th year in a rowOnly tech company globally to receive a Triple A score across Climate, Forests and Water listsNamed one of the 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World for the 8th year in a row
pg9-logo_mostethical.jpg
pg9-logo_energystar.jpg
pg9-logo_dowjones.jpg
Recognized as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies for the 3rd year in a rowRecognized for the 5th year in a row (3rd year for Sustained Excellence)Member of the DJSI World and DJSI North America Indices in 2022, ranking 1st in the industry and listed on the world index for the 11th year in a row
pg9-logo_2022best.jpg
pg9-logo_clean200.jpg
pg9-logo_2022cnbc.jpg
Received a score of 100% on the Human Rights Campaign 2021 Corporate Equality Index for LGBTQ EqualityIncluded in the top 10 companies by revenue for clean energy for the 4th year in a rowNamed for the 5th year in a row
pg10-logo_2021ecovadis.jpg
pg10-logo_disability.jpg
Earned a Platinum Recognition level, the 13th consecutive year HP has been recognized100% score on the Disability Equality Index as a Best Place to Work for Disability Inclusion for the 7th year in a row
*“World’s Most Ethical Companies” and “Ethisphere” names and marks are registered trademarks of Ethisphere LLC.
10
logo_hp.jpg 

Participating in Our Annual Meeting
HP’s current virtual format allows stockholders to submit questions and comments in our stockholder forum both before and during the perspectivesmeeting. We respond to all stockholder submissions received through the forum in writing on our investor relations website.
The virtual meeting format allows our stockholders to engage with us no matter where they live in the world and is accessible and available on any internet-connected device, be it a phone, a tablet, or a computer. We are able to reach a base of stockholders that is broader than just those who can travel to an in-person meeting. The virtual meeting gives us the opportunity to respond in thoughtful detail to every question our stockholders may have, rather than just the limited number of questions stockholders are able to ask at in-person meetings, which are answered without an opportunity for further information gathering or meaningful reflection. All of these benefits of a virtual meeting allow all of our stockholders to engage with HP.
Stockholders can submit questions in advance of the Company’s shareholders, whose views are actively sought through the Company’s robust shareholder engagement program.

In the summer of 2018 following Xerox Holdings Corporation’s (“Xerox”) termination of the Fuji-Xerox merger agreementannual meeting by visiting our annual meeting website at www.proxyvote.com/HP. All questions received, both during and the appointment of John Visentin as the chief executive office of Xerox, HP and Xerox held intermittent discussions concerning the possibility of potential joint business initiatives including, in particular, the possibility that HP would serve as a manufacturer of equipment to be sold by Xerox (the “OEM Arrangement”). These discussions were led by Steve Bandrowczak, Xerox’s president and chief operations officer, and Enrique Lores, then head of HP’s printing division. Discussions concerning the OEM Arrangement were commercial and friendly, and did result in commercial arrangements. These discussions continued throughout 2019. In the course of these discussions, Mr. Bandrowczak said on a number of occasions that Xerox wanted to be acquired by HP and sought Mr. Lores’ thoughts on that issue, and Mr. Lores replied that it was premature to contemplate that, and first the companies should get to know one another better through the OEM Arrangement and other possible joint business initiatives that could make sense.

On June 25, 2019, following an extensive corporate strategy process led by Enrique Lores, the board of directors of HP (“HP Board”) reviewed and approved an updated corporate strategy proposal that included, among other things, the pursuit of potential acquisition targets in the Print business. The HP Board subsequently reviewed and discussed considerations for a number of potential targets, including Xerox.

On August 12, 2019, Carl Icahn, the largest shareholder of Xerox, phoned Dion Weisler, HP’s then-chief executive officer. Based on publicly reported information, HP believed that Mr. Icahn was the beneficial owner of approximately 10.6% of Xerox’s outstanding common stock at such time. Mr. Icahn communicated that he believed HP was a well-run company with a strong management team and stated that he had accumulated approximately 60 million shares of HP common stock, constituting 4.125% of HP’s then-outstanding shares of common stock. Mr. Icahn further expressed his belief that there was considerable value in combining Xerox and HP, that HP should consider buying Xerox (or, if not, that Mr. Icahn would consider making an offer to acquire HP) and that he wanted a transaction to occur quickly. Mr. Weisler expressed that HP was always open to hearing from its shareholders and that the HP Board was focused on creating shareholder value. Following the call, on August 13, 2019, Mr. Icahn sent Mr. Weisler an e-mail attaching two Xerox slides showing estimated synergies of $3.5 billion that a combined company could achieve with full impact in 2023.

On August 22, 2019, the Company announced that Mr. Weisler had decided to step down for a family health matter and that the HP Board had unanimously appointed Mr. Lores (then head of HP’s printing division) to succeed Mr. Weisler as the Company’s chief executive officer effective November 1, 2019.

On August 23, 2019, Mr. Bandrowczak called Mr. Lores (then head of HP’s printing division) and advised that Mr. Visentin was planning to tell Mr. Weisler that Xerox was very interested in a combination with HP at an upcoming, previously-scheduled breakfast meeting. On August 26, 2019, Mr. Icahn called Mr. Weisler and expressed that he was focused on quickly pursuing a combination of HP with Xerox and asked Mr. Weisler for his views on HP buying Xerox. Mr. Weisler expressed to Mr. Icahn that HP would require further information from Xerox in order to assess a potential acquisition and that he would follow up directly with Mr. Visentin. Later that day, Mr. Weisler sent Mr. Visentin a list of threshold questions that would need to be addressed by Xerox before HP would engage in full discussions concerning an acquisition of Xerox. These questions related to topics including synergy calculations, Xerox’s “Project Own It” restructuring initiative, Xerox’s intellectual property, Xerox’s plans for its financing subsidiary, regulatory matters, Xerox’s joint venture with Fujifilm Holdings and the litigation between Xerox and Fujifilm, and the impact of a potential transaction on Xerox’s critical contracts.

8www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

On August 27, 2019, Mr. Visentin phoned Mr. Weisler and stated that Xerox was eager to combine with HP, and that he hoped that HP would include stock consideration in any offer to acquire Xerox. He also stated that he knew that Mr. Icahn had taken an ownership position in HP. Mr. Visentin advised that Xerox would provide HP with the information HP had requested.

On September 4, 2019, Mr. Weisler and Mr. Visentin had their previously-scheduled breakfast meeting. At the meeting, Mr. Visentin stated that, strategically, Xerox’s Board believed that Xerox was out of organic growth opportunities and must either grow through a strategic acquisition or be acquired. He informed Mr. Weisler that Xerox had offered to buy Fujifilm Holdings Corporation’s (“Fuji”) interest in their joint venture, but Fuji had declined to enter into negotiations. Mr. Visentin further stated that Xerox could try to acquire HP, but that the extreme leverage that Xerox would need to take on to make such an acquisition and the resulting potential for a credit downgrade made it preferable for HP to acquire Xerox. Mr. Visentin expressed a preference for HP to use its stock as acquisition currency, but said that cash could also be acceptable. Mr. Weisler expressed that HP was attempting to evaluate a potential transaction, but was still awaiting the requested information from Xerox that was necessary to conduct even a preliminary evaluation of a potential transaction, and without that information, HP could not determine next steps. Mr. Weisler reiterated that HP remained open to all value-creating options.

During late August/early September 2019, Kim Rivera, HP’s president of strategy and business management and chief legal officer, worked with Louie Pastor, Xerox’s executive vice president and general counsel, to coordinate a follow-up meeting between a few high level executives from their respective companies, which ultimately resulted in a meeting on September 12, 2019.

On September 12, 2019, there was an in-person meeting between selected senior management of HP and selected senior management of Xerox. Neither company’s chief executive officer was present. At the meeting, Xerox shared a slide presentation regarding, among other things, selected contractual provisions to which it was subject; the progress of Xerox’s cost cutting program, which it referred to as Project Own-It; and potential synergies of a combined HP-Xerox. Two of the slides discussing potential synergies were substantially identical to those provided to Mr. Weisler by Mr. Icahn on August 13, 2019. The slides included an illustrative valuation analysis of an acquisition of Xerox for $40-46 per share in cash and showing $3.5 billion of cost synergies achieved by 2022.

Overall, the level of information provided by Xerox was largely equivalent to Xerox’s December 9, 2019 investor presentation. “Synergy” estimates were large, round numbers without the detail required to validate that they had a sound basis. Notably, questions raised by HP about the current trajectory of the Xerox business (including but not limited to questions raised in response to the review of the materials presented by Xerox and as part of the discussion relating to the goals and results of Project Own It, which HP management believed were important in order to properly contextualize and understand trends in Xerox’s business and its publicly reported financial results) were deferred and not addressed.

On September 27, 2019, Mr. Visentin had a telephone conversation with Mr. Weisler. Mr. Visentin pressed Mr. Weisler regarding next steps. Mr. Weisler emphasized that HP required the threshold information that it had requested in order to make any determinations. Mr. Visentin said that he would attempt to facilitate the provision of that information.

On October 1, 2019, a few high-level executives from Xerox and HP participated in a video conference. Priorprior to the meeting, are presented as submitted, uncensored and unedited except for certain personal details for data protection purposes. If we receive substantially similar questions, we will group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. Please visit our HP had shared a list of questions with Xerox and identified them as topics that HP would likeinvestor events page at https://investor.hp.com to address at the meeting. The questions related to topics including Xerox’s business mix, financial performance, strategy and trajectory, Xerox’s joint venture with Fujifilm Holdings and the litigation between Xerox and Fujifilm, and compliance matters. At the meeting, the representatives of Xerox pressed the representatives of HP as to why HP required due diligence in order to make an offer to acquire Xerox. The representatives of Xerox then provided limited information with respect to plans for Xerox’s ownership interest in its joint venture with Fuji, synergies and certain other topics. Again, notably, questions raised by HP about the fundamental health and trajectory of Xerox’s business were deferred and not addressed.

On October 4, 2019, Mr. Weisler spoke with Mr. Visentin. Mr. Weisler confirmed that HP was prepared to enter into a non-disclosure agreement with Xerox and to commit time and resources to further explore a business combination, if Xerox would be willing to begin sharing substantive information with HP. Mr. Visentin stated that Xerox required HP to make an indicative offer, including the price (or price range) to acquire Xerox, before Xerox would continue the discussions. Mr. Weisler stated that HP could not specify a price without theread previously requested threshold information, given HP’s concerns regarding Xerox’s business and the limited information that had been provided to date. Mr. Visentin agreed to present to the Xerox board of directors HP’s proposal to execute a non-disclosure agreement relating to the receipt of additional substantive information from Xerox.

answered questions.
Proxy Statement
Please join us for our Virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholder meeting.com/HPQ2023.
9To participate in the annual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice of Internet availability of the proxy materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
pg11-pic_laptop.jpg
We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call:
1-855-449-0991 (Toll-free)
1-720-378-5962 (Toll line)
pg10-icon_phone.jpg
2023 PROXY STATEMENT11

Table of Contents

icon_checkblack.jpg
icon_checkblack.jpg
icon_checkblack.jpg
icon_checkblack.jpg
icon_crossblack.jpg
12
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors

On October 10, 2019, Mr. Visentin confirmed that Xerox was unwilling to provide any substantive information without an indicative offer price from HP. Mr. Weisler again confirmed that HP was prepared to commit the requisite time and resources to a focused, expeditious process to inform its valuation of a potential combination, if Xerox was willing to provide the threshold diligence information previously discussed. Mr. Visentin informed Mr. Weisler that Xerox was not willing and, therefore, discussions were at an end.

In the evening of November 5, 2019, Mr. Visentin contacted Mr. Weisler to inform him that Xerox’s Board had approved an offer for Xerox to acquire HP for consideration comprised of $17.00 in cash and 0.137 shares of Xerox common stock per share of HP common stock (the “November Proposal”). Mr. Visentin also stated that Xerox had received a highly confident letter from Citibank with respect to the required financing. That same evening, reports of the November Proposal appeared in theWall Street Journal. Mr. Visentin sent a letter containing the November Proposal to Mr. Lores that evening by email.

On November 6, 2019, HP publicly confirmed that a proposal had been received from Xerox.

On November 8, 2019, a telephone conversation between Mr. Icahn, Mr. Lores and Mr. Weisler was arranged at Mr. Icahn’s request to Mr. Weisler. At Mr. Icahn’s suggestion, Keith Cozza, the Chairman of the Board of Xerox and Mr. Icahn’s employee, also joined the call. Mr. Icahn informed Mr. Weisler and Mr. Lores that he believed that HP and Xerox should move to combine swiftly in a transaction in which Mr. Icahn would receive stock of the combined company, and that if HP was unwilling to do that, Xerox and Mr. Icahn were prepared to escalate the situation. Mr. Lores informed Mr. Icahn that HP’s Board had received and was evaluating the November Proposal, and reiterated that HP had remained willing to continue discussions about the potential of a strategic combination of the two companies before Xerox terminated discussions due to its refusal to share any substantive information. On the same day, Mr. Weisler and Mr. Lores had a similar telephone conversation with Mr. Visentin.

On November 13, 2019, Mr. Lores phoned Mr. Icahn. Mr. Lores informed Mr. Icahn that HP was considering the November Proposal. Mr. Icahn reiterated that he believed that there was significant value from a combination between Xerox and HP, and that he was open to alternative transaction structures. That same evening, Mr. Icahn was quoted in an article in theWall Street Journalas being in favor of a combination of Xerox and HP; in that article, Mr. Icahn publicly disclosed his ownership of approximately 4.24% of HP’s then-outstanding common stock.

Also on November 13, 2019, the HP Board met to evaluate the November Proposal.

Board proposal no. 1
Election of directors
icon-check_blue2.jpg
The board recommends a vote for each director nominee.
The HP Board considered its financial advisor’s analysis of the November Proposal. The HP Board further considered that there remained significant unanswered questions relating to: (1) potential value creation that could arise from a combination of Xerox and HP, given the lack of access to substantive information that would be required to evaluate the quantum of synergies that a deal might create; (2) the future business trajectory of Xerox, given the recent deterioration in Xerox’s business; (3) Xerox's ability to finance a deal with investment grade notes, given Xerox's current non-investment grade ratings from all three major rating agencies (Ba1 with negative outlook from Moody's, BB+ with negative outlook from S&P, and BB from Fitch); and (4) the potential impact of outsized debt levels on the combined company’s stock. The HP Board determined that the November Proposal significantly undervalued HP relative to the Company’s standalone plan and options to deploy its strong balance sheet to generate shareholder value, and that rejecting the November Proposal was in the best interests of HP’s shareholders. The HP Board instructed Mr. Lores to convey its rejection of the November Proposal to Xerox and to reiterate that HP was open to exploring a potential combination, but still needed answers to its threshold questions to proceed further.

On November 14, 2019, Mr. Lores and Mr. Visentin spoke by telephone. Mr. Lores informed Mr. Visentin that Mr. Lores had spoken to Mr. Icahn, and informed him that HP planned to respond to Xerox’s proposal in the coming days. Mr. Visentin informed Mr. Lores that Xerox’s offer would remain open following the November 13, 2019 date stated in the letter conveying the November Proposal, and subsequently sent Mr. Lores an email confirming that Xerox would extend the time period for HP to respond to the offer until the end of the day on November 18, 2019.

On November 17, 2019, the HP Board sent the following letter to Mr. Visentin:

Dear John,

Our Board of Directors has reviewed and considered your unsolicited proposal dated November 5, 2019 at a meeting with our financial and legal advisors and has unanimously concluded that it significantly undervalues HP and is not in the best interests of HP shareholders. In reaching this determination, the Board also considered the highly conditional and uncertain nature of the proposal, including the potential impact of outsized debt levels on the combined company’s stock.

We have great confidence in our strategy and our ability to execute to continue driving sustainable long-term value at HP. In addition, the Board and management team continue to take actions to enhance shareholder value including the deployment of our strong balance sheet for increased repurchases of our significantly undervalued stock and for value-creating M&A.

10www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

We recognize the potential benefits of consolidation, and we are open to exploring whether there is value to be created for HP shareholders through a potential combination with Xerox. However, as we have previously shared in connection with our prior requests for diligence, we have fundamental questions that need to be addressed in our diligence of Xerox. We note the decline of Xerox’s revenue from $10.2 billion to $9.2 billion (on a trailing 12-month basis) since June 2018, which raises significant questions for us regarding the trajectory of your business and future prospects. In addition, we believe it is critical to engage in a rigorous analysis of the achievable synergies from a potential combination. With substantive engagement from Xerox management and access to diligence information on Xerox, we believe that we can quickly evaluate the merits of a potential transaction.

We remain ready to engage with you to better understand your business and any value to be created from a combination.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

/s/ Enrique Lores and Chip Bergh

Also on November 17, 2019, Mr. Lores had a telephone conversation with Mr. Visentin, and multiple conversations with Mr. Icahn, regarding HP’s response to the November Proposal. Mr. Lores told Mr. Visentin and Mr. Icahn that HP continued to stand ready to do due diligence on Xerox in order to assess a potential strategic combination. Each of Mr. Visentin and Mr. Icahn separately encouraged a mutual due diligence process and conveyed that Xerox was likely unwilling to proceed with one-way diligence by HP and might pursue a proxy contest to elect directors to HP’s Board instead. Mr. Icahn suggested that, if HP wanted a consensual resolution, HP should make an offer to acquire Xerox and suggested that $45 per share might be an attractive price if HP were to do so.

On November 20, 2019, Mr. Visentin informed Mr. Lores that Xerox would respond to HP the following day. Mr. Visentin stated that Xerox would be insisting on mutual due diligence before a deal could move forward.

On November 21, 2019, Mr. Visentin sent a letter to Mr. Lores and Chip Bergh, Chairman of the Board of HP, and publicly released such letter. In the letter, Mr. Visentin stated that if HP did not agree to mutual confirmatory due diligence by Monday, November 25, 2019, Xerox would take steps to present its November Proposal directly to HP shareholders. On the same day, there were telephone conversations between Mr. Lores and Mr. Visentin to reiterate the letter sent by Mr. Visentin to Mr. Lores and Mr. Bergh on that day.

On November 23 and 24, 2019, the HP Board held a telephonic meeting during which it reviewed and considered Xerox’s November 21, 2019 letter. The HP Board considered that Xerox’s offer had not changed and, accordingly, still significantly undervalued HP. The HP Board further considered the impetus for Xerox’s perceived urgency to reach a transaction, the HP Board’s questions about Xerox’s standalone prospects, and the fact that Xerox’s requested timing would not permit the Company to perform due diligence to the extent that the HP Board considered necessary in order to assess the potential impact of a transaction on HP shareholders.

Also on November 24, 2019, and following separate conversations between Mr. Lores and Mr. Visentin and Mr. Lores and Mr. Icahn in which Mr. Lores informed Mr. Visentin and Mr. Icahn of HP’s response to the November 21 letter, Mr. Lores and Mr. Bergh responded to Mr. Visentin’s November 21, 2019 letter on behalf of the HP Board with the following letter:

Dear John,

The HP Board of Directors has reviewed and considered your November 21 letter, which has provided no new information beyond your November 5 letter. We reiterate that we reject Xerox’s proposal as it significantly undervalues HP. Additionally, it is highly conditional and uncertain. In particular, there continues to be uncertainty regarding Xerox’s ability to raise the cash portion of the proposed consideration and concerns regarding the prudence of the resulting outsized debt burden on the value of the combined company’s stock even if the financing were obtained. Consequently, your proposal does not constitute a basis for due diligence or negotiation.

We believe it is important to emphasize that we are not dependent on a Xerox combination. We have great confidence in our strategy and the numerous opportunities available to HP to drive sustainable long-term value, including the deployment of our strong balance sheet for increased share repurchases of our significantly undervalued stock and for value-creating M&A.

Proxy Statement11


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

It is clear in your aggressive words and actions that Xerox is intent on forcing a potential combination on opportunistic terms and without providing adequate information. When we were in private discussions with you in August and September, we repeatedly raised our questions; you failed to address them and instead walked away, choosing to pursue a hostile approach rather than continue down a more productive path. But these fundamental issues have not gone away, and your now-public urgency to accelerate toward a deal, still without addressing these questions, only heightens our concern about your business and prospects. Accordingly, we must have due diligence to determine whether a Xerox combination has any merit.

We remain prepared to study the potential value of a combination and to work quickly to learn more about your business trajectory. However, there are significant concerns about both the near-term health and long-term viability of your business that have a significant impact on Xerox’s value. The question of whether there is a path to turn around your business is a threshold issue. In addition to the visible and substantial declines at Xerox, our specific concerns include:

Xerox has missed consensus revenue estimates in four of the last five quarters;

Xerox’s revenue has fallen from $10.2 billion to $9.2 billion (on a trailing 12-month basis) since June 2018, and this is expected to continueXerox management projects revenue declines of 6% in fiscal 2019;

Given how much of your business is based on contractual revenue, we are concerned about the decline in customer Total Contract Value (TCV) in excess of revenue declines, which suggests your revenues may decline even faster in future years. We note that the TCV of enterprise signings (including renewals) in 2018 was down 13.9% in constant currency and your churn for 2018 was 18%, both data points which Xerox has stopped providing publicly since the end of 2018;

Our review of synergies based on public information and the limited information you have shared does not support achievable synergies of the scale you suggest, and it appears that your assumptions include significant savings that are already included in each company’s independently announced cost reduction plans; and

It appears to us that when Xerox exited the Fujifilm joint venture, Xerox essentially mortgaged its future for a short-term cash infusion. We fear that the exit has left a sizeable strategic hole in Xerox’s portfolio. In addition, we have concerns as to the state of Xerox’s technology resources, research and development pipeline, future product programs, and supply continuity and capability. Finally, we note that Xerox will have to get access to the fastest growing Asia Pacific region.

The HP Board of Directors is committed to serving the best interests of HP shareholders, not Xerox and its shareholders. HP has numerous opportunities to create value for HP shareholders on a standalone basis. We will not let aggressive tactics or hostile gestures distract us from our responsibility to pursue the most value-creating path.

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

/s/ Enrique Lores and Chip Bergh

On November 26, 2019, Mr. Visentin sent a letter to Mr. Lores and Mr. Bergh, in response to the letter sent by Mr. Lores and Mr. Bergh on November 24, 2019. Mr. Visentin stated that Xerox planned to engage directly with HP shareholders to solicit their support for the November Proposal. This letter was made public on the date it was sent to HP.

On December 4, 2019, Mr. Icahn published an open letter to HP’s shareholders criticizing HP’s decision not to engage in mutual due diligence.

On December 9, 2019, Xerox filed a publicly available presentation advocating for the November 6 proposal.

On December 17, 2019, Moody’s Investors Service issued a credit opinion update that reflected uncertainty about Xerox’s ability to stabilize and grow its revenue base over the next few years. Moody’s stated that the transaction contemplated by the November Proposal would lead to higher leverage, significant costs to realize synergies, and significant execution risks. Moody’s also stated that it believed that Xerox’s credit profile could be pressured if the transaction was consummated.

On January 6, 2020, Mr. Visentin sent a letter to Mr. Lores and Mr. Bergh (which was also made public) stating that Xerox had obtained financing commitments in connection with the November Proposal from Citigroup Global Markets Inc, Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and Bank of America, N.A.

12www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

On January 8, 2020, Mr. Lores and Mr. Bergh, on behalf of HP’s Board, sent the following letter to Mr. Visentin responding to his January 6, 2020 letter:

Dear John,

We reiterate that the HP Board of Directors’ focus is on driving sustainable long-term value for HP shareholders. Your letter dated January 6, 2020 regarding financing does not address the key issue – that Xerox’s proposal significantly undervalues HP – and is not a basis for discussion. The HP Board of Directors remains committed to advancing the best interests of all HP shareholders and to pursuing the most value-creating opportunities.

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

/s/ Enrique Lores and Chip Bergh

On January 23, 2020, Xerox submitted to HP a notice of the nomination of 11 directors and four alternate director nominees for election to the HP Board at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting. Xerox made a public announcement of its intention to nominate candidates to the HP Board on the same day.

Further on January 23, 2020, HP issued a statement in response to Xerox’s announcement of its intention to nominate directors for election to the HP Board at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting providing that the HP Board believes “that the nominations are a self-serving tactic by Xerox to advance its proposal that significantly undervalues HP and creates meaningful risk to the detriment of HP shareholders.”

On February 10, 2020, Xerox announced its intention to launch a tender offer on or around March 2, 2020, for all of the outstanding shares of common stock of HP at a nominal price of $24.00 per share, to be comprised of $18.40 in cash and 0.149 Xerox shares for each HP shareInc. (the “Revised Proposal”“Board”). Xerox stated that, while it did not have financing sufficient to fund the Revised Proposal, it was in discussions regarding a sale of convertible securities.

On February 11, 2020, HP announced the release date for its earnings for the first fiscal quarter of 2020 would be February 24; that it would present additional information about its long-term strategic plans at such time; and that it wants its shareholders to have full information on the earnings and the value inherent in the Company before responding to Xerox’s February 10 press release.

On February 20, 2020, given Xerox’s announcement that it intended to commence a tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of HP common stock, HP adopted and announced a limited shareholder rights plan that expires on February 20, 2021, and declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of HP common stock to stockholders of record on March 2, 2020.

In the event that a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 20% or more of HP’s then outstanding common stock, subject to certain exceptions, each right would entitle its holder (other than such person or members of such group) to purchase additional shares of HP common stock at a substantial discount to the public market price. In addition, at any time after a person or group acquires 20% or more of HP’s outstanding common stock (unless such person or group acquires 50% or more), the HP Board may exchange one share of HP common stock for each outstanding right (other than rights owned by such person or group, which would have become void). The shareholder rights plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire HP or a large block of HP’s common stock without the approval of the Board.

HP adopted the shareholder rights plan because the HP Board believed that it would be essential that HP shareholders have sufficient time and full information when considering any tender offer that Xerox may commence. Following the commencement of the exchange offer by Xerox on March 2, 2020, the HP Board reaffirmed the shareholder rights plan and the maintenance of the rights to contribute to the preservation of HP’s long-term value for its stockholders, including in light of the commencement of the exchange offer.

On February 21, 2020, a friend of Mr. Icahn suggested to Mr. Bergh, the Chairman of the HP Board, that the two discuss the situation; and on February 22, 2020, Mr. Icahn and a colleague from Icahn Associates spoke with Mr. Bergh and Mr. Robert Bennett, another member of the HP Board. Mr. Bergh had not previously spoken or emailed with Mr. Icahn, and has never spoken with or otherwise had contact with Mr. Visentin. The conversation was cordial. Messrs. Bergh and Bennett stated that they were primarily there to listen and were interested to hear the views of Mr. Icahn on the situation in that HP was in a “quiet period” with earnings to be released on February 24. Mr. Icahn’s views were generally the

Proxy Statement13


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

same as had been reported in the news media the same day, including his perspective on management structure. Messrs. Bergh and Bennett indicated that their focus was HP shareholder value, especially in light of the significant amount of equity to be held by HP shareholders in any combination; that HP was a very large complex and global group of businesses relative to Xerox where failure to execute well on the business plan could have negative consequences on a scale greater than the value of Xerox; and that they had significant confidence in the HP team’s ability to reduce costs in the business judiciously while also executing the plan across the size and breadth of HP’s businesses over time.

On February 24, 2020, HP announced its earnings for the first fiscal quarter of 2020 and announced a new strategic and financial value plan including new 3-year financial targets and a new capital return plan. In connection with that, HP announced that the revised Xerox proposal announced on February 10 meaningfully undervalues HP, creates significant risk and compromises the future of the company. HP also announced that HP was reaching out to Xerox to explore if there is a combination that creates value for HP shareholders that is additive to HP’s strategic and financial plan. At the same time, Mr. Lores sent an email to Mr. Visentin proposing to arrange a meeting to explore the basis for a transaction and alternative transaction frameworks that could deliver attractive value to both HP and Xerox shareholders, and offering that Mr. Lores’ office would reach out to Mr. Visentin’s office to arrange a time to discuss. Such meeting was held on March 10, 2020 in New York.

On March 2, 2020, Xerox commenced an exchange offer to acquire all outstanding shares of HP common stock.

****************

The Board currently consists of 13 Directors. On the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility (“NGSR”) Committee, the Board has nominated the 1213 persons named below for election as Directors this year, each to serve for a one-year term and until the Director’s successor is elected and qualified or, if earlier, until his or her resignation or removal. Mr. Weisler is not standing for re-election

Vote Required
Each Director nominee who receives more “FOR” votes than “AGAINST” votes representing shares of HP common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to be voted at thisthe annual meeting and the Board has determined that the size of the Board will be reduced to 12 Directors at the time of the annual meeting.

Our Board recommends using the enclosed WHITEelected.

If you sign your proxy card but do not give instructions with respect to votevoting for Directors, your shares will be voted by Enrique Lores, Julie Jacobs and Rick Hansen (or any one of them), as proxy holders, FOR the election of all of the Board’s 12 Director nominees listed below.

Xerox has notified us of its intent13 Board nominees. If you wish to nominate a slate of 12 nominees for election as Directors at the annual meeting in opposition to the nominees proposed by our Board. Our Board does not endorse any Xerox nominee and unanimously recommends that you disregard any blue proxy card that may be sent to you by Xerox. Voting to “withhold”give specific instructions with respect to any of Xerox’s nominees on its proxy card is not the same as voting FOR our Board’s nominees, because a vote to “withhold” with respect to any of Xerox’s nominees on its proxy card will revoke any previous proxy submitted by you, including any votefor Directors, you may have made for our Board’s nominees. Ifdo so by indicating your instructions when you have previously voted using a blue proxy card sent to you by Xerox, you may change your vote by voting via the Internet or by telephone, by following the easy instructions providedor on the enclosed WHITE proxy card. You may also sign, date and return the enclosed WHITEyour proxy card or voting instruction card.

Director Election Voting Standard and Resignation Policy
We have adopted a policy whereby any incumbent Director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “AGAINST” his or her election than votes “FOR” such election will tender his or her offer of resignation for consideration by the NGSR Committee. The NGSR Committee will then make a recommendation to the address indicated onBoard regarding the card, but we strongly encourage youappropriate response to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet. Only the latest validly executed proxy that you submit will be counted.

14www.hpannualmeeting.com


such an offer of resignation.

Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Who We Are

Overview

Our Directors bring an extraordinary wealtha diverse mix of highly relevant and complementary skills, experiences and backgrounds, towhich facilitates strong oversight of HP’s management and HP’s strategy. In 2021, the Board. From Subra Suresh, an acclaimed scientist whose background in microfluidics gives him key understanding intoBoard added three new directors: Bruce Broussard; Judith “Jami” Miscik; and Kim K.W. Rucker and during 2022, the futureBoard refreshed its committee leadership by appointing Kim K.W. Rucker as Chair of technologies, including 3D printing, to Stacy Brown-Philpot,the NGSR Committee and Richard Clemmer as the Chair of the Finance, Investment and Technology (“FIT”) Committee. Ms. Rucker, who has served as general counsel and as a director at public companies across multiple industries, contributes a broad knowledge of law, corporate governance and regulatory matters. Mr. Clemmer has served as CEO of TaskRabbit,multiple technology companies, as a company at the forefront of today’s personal services-oriented disruptivedirector for several public technology boom, our Board members are advising us based on real world experiences. MacArthur Fellow Yoky Matsuoka brings her leadership and research and development experiences from acclaimed academic institutions and industry leading companies. Their skills are complementary. Chip Bergh’s experience at Procter & Gamble and now Levi’s means he can instantly grasp the complexities of our supply chain and Richard Clemmer’s experience at NXP Semiconductors and Agere Systems enables him to provide valuable insight in connection with the evaluation and execution of key strategic transactions, while Shumeet Banerji and Mary Anne Citrino both come from financial industry careers, lending keen eyes to our financial management, risk oversight and investment strategy. Former public company CEOs Stephanie Burns and Robert Bennett lend the benefit of their experience at the helms of companies, and Aida Alvarezhas proven he has extensive experience in investment and Stacey Mobley provide perspectives from the fields of government and corporate law, respectively. Together, these Directors and their skills help us to keep reinventing.

Our Director Nominees

Name
Principal Occupation
AgeHP Director
Since
CommitteesOther Current Public Company/
Public Registrant Boards
AFHN

Aida M. Alvarez  INDEPENDENT
Former Administrator, U.S. Small Business
Administration & Cabinet Member

70

2016

K12 Inc.
Fastly, Inc.
Oportun, Inc.

Shumeet Banerji  INDEPENDENT
Co-Founder and Partner, Condorcet, LP

60

2011

Reliance Industries Ltd.

Robert R. Bennett  INDEPENDENT
Managing Director, Hilltop Investments, LLC

61

2013

Discovery Communications, Inc.
Liberty Media Corporation

Charles “Chip” V. Bergh  INDEPENDENT
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Levi Strauss & Co.

62

2015

Levi Strauss & Co.

Stacy Brown-Philpot  INDEPENDENT
Chief Executive Officer, TaskRabbit

44

2015

Nordstrom, Inc.

Stephanie A. Burns  INDEPENDENT
Former Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman, Dow Corning

65

2015

Corning Incorporated
Kellogg Company

Mary Anne Citrino  INDEPENDENT
Senior Advisor and former Senior Managing
Director, Blackstone

60

2015

Barclays plc
Royal Ahold Delhaize
Alcoa Corporation

Richard L. Clemmer  INDEPENDENT
Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director,
NXP Semiconductors N.V.(1)

68

2020

  

NCR Corporation
NXP Semiconductors N.V.

Yoky Matsuoka  INDEPENDENT
Division CEO, Panasonic Corporation

47

2019

None

Stacey Mobley  INDEPENDENT
Former Senior Vice President,
Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel,
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

74

2015

None

Subra Suresh  INDEPENDENT
President, Nanyang Technological University

63

2015

Singapore Exchange Limited

Enrique Lores
President and Chief Executive Officer, HP Inc.

54

2019

None

other strategic transactions.
(1)NXP Semiconductors recently nominated a successor to succeed Mr. Clemmer as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director and this will be proposed by NXP Semiconductors’ Board of Directors at NXP Semiconductors’ annual general meeting of shareholders scheduled for May 27, 2020. Mr. Clemmer will remain a strategic advisor to NXP Semiconductors upon stepping down.

CommitteesAAudit
Committee
FFinance, Investment
and Technology
Committee
HHuman Resources
and Compensation
Committee
NNominating, Governance
and Social Responsibility
Committee
Chair

Proxy Statement15


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Collective Skills of Our Director Nominees

HP benefits from having leading academics in relevant fields sharing their expertise and providing valuable guidance on research trends and emerging areas of innovation.HP operates one of the world’s largest supply chains, spanning a diverse mix of geographies, suppliers, contractors and partners – we benefit from Directors who have successfully led complex operations and can help us to optimize our business model.
It’s essential that we have Directors with experience allocating capital for large and complex enterprises, as these Directors provide valuable insights as HP continues to reduce costs and optimize its cost structure.As a large global company serving a diverse set of customer segments, HP requires a Board well-versed in navigating complexity and capitalizing on business opportunities to further our innovation and growth.
HP’s customers are the foundation of our mission – we continually seek to better serve our customer base with products and solutions that inspire and innovate.Cutting edge R&D, science and engineering have been core to HP’s success for decades – Directors with scientific backgrounds can provide technical advice and bring a deep understanding of the innovative core of our company.
At HP we continually seek to reinvent the Print and PC industries to deliver amazing innovative experiences to our customers – having disruptive innovators on our Board helps inform our strategy and drive us forward.HP benefits from having Directors with experience leading organizations through significant strategic transactions, including mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, as well as the successful integration of acquired businesses, as these directors provide useful guidance and oversight as HP implements its strategy.
As a Fortune 100 company with a vast financial footprint, it’s essential that we have Directors with strong financial acumen and experience to provide sound oversight and guide our investment strategies.The dynamic and fast-moving markets in which HP operates globally require a Board with strong strategic insights gained through multi-faceted and challenging prior experiences.
Substantive government experience on our Board offers us insight into the regulatory environment of the many jurisdictions in which we operate, their legislative and administrative priorities, and the potential implications for our business.With our deep history of innovation, we know that design, technology and user experience add valuable and vital components to our Board dialogue.
HP operates in 180 countries worldwide, making international business experience a vital perspective on our Board and enabling us to succeed in the many markets in which we operate.2023 PROXY STATEMENT13

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors

International

Our Director Nominees
Name and principal occupationAgeHP director
since
CommitteesOther current public company/public registrant boards
pg17_photo-alvarez.jpg
Aida M. Alvarez  Independent
Consultant; Former Administrator, U.S. Small Business
Administration & Presidential Cabinet Member
732016
icon_hn.jpg
Stride, Inc.
Fastly, Inc.
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.
pg17_photo-shumeet.jpg
Shumeet Banerji  Independent
Co-Founder and Partner, Condorcet, LP
632011
icon_hn.jpg
Reliance Industries Ltd.
photo_bennettr.jpg
Robert R. Bennett  Independent
Managing Director, Hilltop Investments, LLC
642013
icon_af1.jpg
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
Liberty Media Corporation
pg18_photo-bergh.jpg
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh (CHAIRMAN)  Independent
President and Chief Executive Officer, Levi Strauss & Co.
652015
icon_hn.jpg
Levi Strauss & Co.
photo_broussardb2.jpg
Bruce Broussard  Independent
President and Chief Executive Officer, Humana Inc.
602021
icon_hn.jpg
Humana Inc.
pg19_photo-brown.jpg
Stacy Brown-Philpot  Independent
Member of Investment Committee, SB Opportunity Fund
472015
icon_an.jpg
Nordstrom, Inc.
pg20_photo-burns.jpg
Stephanie A. Burns  Independent
Former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Dow Corning
682015
icon_fh.jpg
Corning Incorporated
Kellogg Company
pg20_photo-mary.jpg
Mary Anne Citrino  Independent
Senior Advisor and former Senior Managing Director, Blackstone
632015
icon_af2.jpg
Alcoa Corporation
image_0a.jpg
Richard L. Clemmer  Independent
Chairman, Privafy, Inc.
712020
icon_af.jpg
Aptiv PLC
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
pg14-pic_lorese.jpg
Enrique Lores
President and Chief Executive Officer, HP Inc.
572019PayPal Holdings, Inc.
pg22_photo-jami.jpg
Judith “Jami” Miscik  Independent
Senior Advisor, Lazard Ltd.
642021
icon_an.jpg
General Motors Company
Morgan Stanley
photo_ruckerk.jpg
Kim K.W. Rucker  Independent
Former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Andeavor
562021
icon_ang.jpg
Celanese Corporation
Lennox International Inc.
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
image_1.jpg
Subra Suresh  Independent
Former President, Nanyang Technological University
662015
icon_af1.jpg
Singapore Exchange Limited
Committees
icon_a.jpg
Audit Committee
icon_h.jpg
HR and Compensation Committee
icon_boxg5.jpg
Chair
icon_f.jpg
Finance, Investment and Technology Committee
icon_n.jpg
Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee
14
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Board snapshot
GenderIndependence
piechart_gender1.jpg
pg14_people-01.jpg
92%
of the Board is Independent
icon_chairman.jpg
Independent Chairman
Board Refreshment
4
New directors since 2019
Age
63years old
is the average age
Ethnicity
47-60
barchart_averageage1.jpg
4
61-65
barchart_averageage2.jpg 
5
pg14_piechartethnicity.jpg
66-73
barchart_averageage3.jpg 
4
Tenure
5.9 years
is the average tenure
1-3 years
barchart_tenure1.jpg
5
4-7 years
barchart_tenure2.jpg
6
8-12 years
barchart_tenure3.jpg
2
2023 PROXY STATEMENT15

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Skills, Experience and Attributes of Our Director Nominees

North AmericaEuropeAsia

icon_alvarez.jpg
icon_banerji.jpg
icon_bennett.jpg
icon_bergh.jpg
icon_broussard.jpg
icon_brown.jpg
icon_burns.jpg
icon_citrino.jpg
icon_clemmer.jpg
icon_lores.jpg
icon_miscik.jpg
icon_rucker.jpg
icon_suresh.jpg
Current or former CEO
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Business and management
HP requires a Board well-versed in navigating complexity and capitalizing on business opportunities to further our innovation and growth.
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Customer experience
HP’s customers are the foundation of our mission – we continually seek to better serve our customer base with products and solutions that inspire and innovate.
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
Disruptive innovation
We continually seek to reinvent the Print and PC industries to deliver amazing innovative experiences to our customers – having disruptive innovators on our Board helps inform our strategy.
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Environmental and social responsibility
Experience in environmental and social responsibility related issues and topics strengthens the Board’s oversight of HP’s policies and programs relating to these issues and reinforces HP’s commitment to sustainability and social responsibility.
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Finance and capital allocation
It is essential that we have Directors with strong financial acumen and experience to provide sound oversight and guide our investment strategies and capital allocation.
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Government and government affairs
Government and government affairs experience offers us insight into the regulatory environment of the many jurisdictions in which we operate, their legislative and administrative priorities, and the potential implications for our business.
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Human capital management
Experience in talent development, managing compensation, overseeing inclusion and diversity efforts, and establishing culture strengthens the Board’s oversight of HP’s key human capital management strategies and programs.
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
International business and affairs
HP operates in over 180 countries worldwide, making international business experience a vital perspective on our Board and enabling us to succeed in the many markets in which we operate.
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
Operations
HP operates one of the world’s largest supply chains – we benefit from Directors who have successfully led complex operations and can help us to optimize our business model.
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Risk management
Experience identifying, assessing and managing a broad spectrum of risks enables directors to effectively oversee the most significant risks facing HP.
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Strategic transactions; M&A
HP benefits from having Directors with experience leading organizations through significant strategic transactions, including mergers, acquisitions and divestitures.
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
Strategy
The dynamic and fast-moving markets in which HP operates globally require a Board with strong strategic insights gained through multi-faceted and challenging prior experiences.
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Technology, cybersecurity and science
With our deep history of innovation and our reliance on cutting edge R&D, science and engineering, and the importance of cybersecurity to our business, we know that backgrounds in technology and user experience, cybersecurity policy, governance and risk management, and science and design, add valuable and vital components to our Board dialogue.
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Independent
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Women
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
Racially/Ethnically diverse
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_bluecircle.jpg
icon_circlewithbg.jpg
Tenure (including Hewlett-Packard Company)712107277733217
16www.hpannualmeeting.com
16
logo_hp.jpg 


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Biographies of Director Nominees

The biographies describe each Director nominee’s qualifications and relevant experience. The biographies include key qualifications, skills, and attributes most relevant to the decision to nominate candidates to serve on the Board.

Aida M. Alvarez

Most Recent Role

pg17_photo-alvarez.jpg
Current role
Consultant
Current public company boards
Former Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration & Cabinet Member

Current Public Company Boards

HP
K12Stride, Inc.
Fastly, Inc.
Oportun,Bill.com Holdings, Inc.

Prior Public Company Boards

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporationpublic
company boards
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
PacifiCare Health Systems Inc.Opportun Financial Corporation
Aida M. Alvarez    Independent
Independent Director
Age:70
Director since:2016
73
HP Board Committees:
HRC, NGSR HR and Compensation, Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee
Director since: 2016

Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

Founding Chair, Latino Community Foundation (since 2003)
Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration (1997–2001)
Director, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (1993–1997)
Vice President, First Boston Corporation and Bear Stearns & Co. (prior to 1993)

Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

The Honorable Aida Alvarez brings to the Board a wealth of expertise in media, public affairs, finance, and government. She led important financial and government agencies and served in the Cabinet of U.S. President William J. Clinton where she provided strategic feedback toas Administrator of the President.U.S. Small Business Administration. She has also been a public finance executive, has chaired a prominent philanthropic organization and was an award-winning journalist. The Board also benefits from Ms. Alvarez’s knowledge of investment banking and finance.

Skills
Business and Management, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Government and Government Affairs, Strategy


GOVERNMENT


STRATEGY


FINANCE


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


Shumeet Banerji

pg17_photo-shumeet.jpg
Current Role

role
Co-founder and Partner of Condorcet, LP, an advisory and investment firm that specializes in developing early stage companies (since 2013)

Current Public Company Boards

public company boards
HP
Reliance Industries Limited

Prior Public Company Boards

public
company boards
Innocoll AG

Shumeet Banerji   Independent
Independent Director
Age:60
Director since:2011
63
HP Board Committees:
HRC, NGSR (Chair) HR and Compensation, Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee
Director since: 2011

Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

Senior Partner, Booz & Company, a consulting company (May 2012–March 2013)
Chief Executive Officer, Booz & Company (July 2008–May 2012)
President of the Worldwide Commercial Business, Booz Allen Hamilton (February 2008–July 2008)
Managing Director, Europe (2007–2008) and United Kingdom (2003–2007), Booz Allen Hamilton (2007–2008)
Managing Director, United Kingdom, Booz Allen Hamilton (2003–2007)
Faculty, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business

Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

Mr. Banerji brings to the Board a robuststrong understanding of the issues facing companies and governments in both matureemerging and emergingmature markets around the world as the founder of Condorcet, LP, an advisory and investment firm focused on early and development stage technology companies, and through his two decades of work with Booz & Company. In particular, Mr. Banerji has valuable experience in addressing a variety of complex issues ranging from corporate strategy, organizational structure, governance, transformational change, operational performance improvement, and merger integration. As CEO of Booz & Company, Mr. Banerji oversaw the separation of Booz & Company from Booz Allen Hamilton. During his career at Booz Allen Hamilton and Booz & Company, he has advised numerous companies on restructuring and M&A, particularly in mature industries. He is the co-author of Cut Costs, Grow Stronger, published by Harvard
Skills
Business Press in 2009.

and Management, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy


CAPITAL
ALLOCATION


FINANCE


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


STRATEGIC
TRANSACTIONS; M&A


STRATEGY

2023 PROXY STATEMENT17


Proxy Statement17


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Robert R. Bennett

pg18_photo-bennett.jpg
Current Role

role
Managing Director, Hilltop Investments, LLC, a private investment company (since 2005)

Current Public Company Boards

public company boards
HP
Warner Bros. Discovery, Communications, Inc.
Liberty Media Corporation

Prior Public Company Boards

public
company boards
Sprint Corporation
Demand Media, Inc.
Discovery Holding Company
Liberty Interactive Corporation
Sprint Nextel Corporation

Robert R. Bennett   Independent
Independent Director
Age:61
Director since:2013
64
HP Board Committees:
Audit, FIT(Chair)Finance, Investment and Technology Committee
Director since: 2013

Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

President, Discovery Holding Company (2005–2008)
President and Chief Executive Officer, Liberty Media Corporation (prior to (1997–2005)

Served in a variety of other executive roles at Liberty Media between 1990 and 1997, including as its principal financial officer from 1991 until 1997
Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

Mr. Bennett brings to the Board in-depth knowledge of the media and telecommunications industry and his knowledge of the capital markets and other financial and operational matters from his experience as the president and chief executive officer of another public company.matters. Additionally, as a result of his positions at Liberty Media, Mr. Bennett brings experience leading organizations through significant strategic transactions, including acquisitions, divestitures and integration. Mr. Bennett also has an in-depth understanding of finance and has held various financial management positions during his career including serving as CFO of a public company. He also contributes valuable insight to the Board due to his experience serving on the boards of both public
Skills
Business and private companies.

Management, Finance and Capital Allocation, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Operations, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


CAPITAL
ALLOCATION


FINANCE


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


OPERATIONS


STRATEGIC
TRANSACTIONS; M&A


STRATEGY


Charles “Chip” V. Bergh

pg18_photo-bergh.jpg
Current Role

role
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Levi Strauss & Co., an apparel/retail company (since September 2011)

Current Public Company Boards

public company boards
HP
Levi Strauss & Co.

Prior Public Company Boards

public
company boards
VF Corporation
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh   Chairman, Independent
Independent Chairman of
the Board

Age:62
Director since:2015
Chairman since:2017
65
HP Board Committees:
HRC, NGSR HR and Compensation, Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee
Director since: 2015
Chairman since: 2017

Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

Group President, Global Male Grooming, Procter & Gamble Co. (2009–September 2011)
In 28 years at Procter & Gamble, Mr. Bergh served in a variety of executive roles, including managing business in multiple regions worldwide

Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

Mr. Bergh brings to the Board extensive experience in executive leadership at large global companies and international business management. From his more than 3035 years at Levi Strauss and Procter & Gamble, Mr. Bergh has a strong operational and strategic background with significant experience in brand management. He also brings public company governance experience as a board member and chair of boards and board committeescommittee member of other public and private companies.

Skills
Business and Management, Customer Experience, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Operations, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


CAPITAL
ALLOCATION


CUSTOMER
EXPERIENCE


OPERATIONS


STRATEGY


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


STRATEGIC
TRANSACTIONS; M&A

18
logo_hp.jpg 


18www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
photo_broussardb21.jpg
Current role
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Humana Inc., a healthcare company (CEO since 2013)
Current public company boards
HP
Humana Inc.
Prior public
company boards
KeyCorp
Bruce Broussard   Independent
Age: 60HP Board Committees: Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility, HR and Compensation Committee
Director since: 2021
Qualifications:
Prior Business and Other Experience
Chief Executive Officer, McKesson Specialty/US Oncology, Inc. (January 2008–December 2011)
In 11 years at US Oncology, Inc., which was acquired by McKesson in December 2010, served in a number of senior executive roles, including Chief Financial Officer, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Other key qualifications
Mr. Broussard brings to the Board extensive experience in executive leadership at large global companies and international business management. From his experience at Humana and US Oncology, Mr. Broussard has significant expertise in the healthcare and health technology sectors. He also brings public company governance experience as a board member and committee member of other public companies.
Skills
Business and Management, Customer Experience, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Operations, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science
pg19_photo-brown.jpg
Current role
Member of Investment Committee, SB Opportunity Fund
(since 2020)
Current public company boards
HP
Nordstrom, Inc.
Prior public
company boards
None
Stacy Brown-PhilpotIndependent

Current Role

Age: 47HP Board Committees: Audit, Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee
Director since: 2015
Qualifications:
Prior Business and Other Experience
Chief Executive Officer, TaskRabbit an online labor interface company (since April 2016)

Current Public Company Boards

HP(April 2016–August 2020)
Nordstrom, Inc.

Prior Public Company Boards

None
Independent Director
Age:44
Director since:2015
HP Board Committees:
Audit, NGSR

Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

Chief Operating Officer, TaskRabbit (January 2013–April 2016)
Entrepreneur-in-Residence, Google Ventures, the venture capital investment arm of Google, Inc., a technology company (“Google”) (May 2012–December 2012)
Senior Director of Global Consumer Operations, Google (2010–May 2012)
Prior to 2010, Ms. Brown-Philpot served in a variety of Director-level positions at Google
Prior to joining Google in 2003, Ms. Brown-Philpot served as a senior analyst and senior associate at the financial firms Goldman Sachs and PwC

Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

Ms. Brown-Philpot brings to the Board extensive operational, analytical, financial, and strategic experience. In addition to her current role as CEO of TaskRabbit from 2016 to 2020, Ms. Brown-Philpot’s decade of experience leading various operations at Google and her prior financial experience from her roles at Goldman Sachs and PwC provide unique operational and financial expertise to the Board.

Skills
Business and Management, Customer Experience, Disruptive Innovation, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Operations, Risk Management, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


CUSTOMER
EXPERIENCE


DISRUPTIVE
INNOVATION


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


FINANCE


OPERATIONS


STRATEGY


TECHNOLOGY

2023 PROXY STATEMENT19


Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Stephanie A. Burns

pg20_photo-burns.jpg
Current Role

role
Director
Current public company boards
Director

Current Public Company Boards

HP
Corning Incorporated
Kellogg Company

Prior Public Company Boards

Dow Corning Corporationpublic
company boards
GlaxoSmithKline plc
Manpower, Inc.
Stephanie A. Burns   Independent
Independent Director
Age:65
Director since:2015
68
HP Board Committees:
FIT, HRC Finance, Investment and Technology, HR and Compensation Committee (Chair)
Director since: 2015

Qualifications:Qualifications

:

Prior Business and Other Experience

Chief Executive Officer, Dow Corning Corp., a silicon-based manufacturing company (2004–May 2011)
President, Dow Corning (2003–November 2010)
Executive Vice President, Dow Corning (2000–2003)

Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

Dr. Burns has more than 30 years of global innovation and business leadership experience and brings significant expertise in scientific research, product development, issues management, science and technology leadership, and business management to the Board. Her leadership experience includes steeringgrowing Dow Corning Corporation during an extended bankruptcythrough materials innovation, investing in solar applications and restructuring process.expanding into emerging markets. Dr. Burns also brings public company governance experience to the Board as a member of boards and board committees of other public companies.

Skills
Business and Management, Customer Experience, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Operations, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


CAPITAL
ALLOCATION


CUSTOMER
EXPERIENCE


OPERATIONS


SCIENCE


STRATEGY


FINANCE


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


STRATEGIC
TRANSACTIONS; M&A


TECHNOLOGY


Proxy Statement19


pg20_photo-mary.jpg

Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Mary Anne Citrino

Current Role

role
Senior Advisor and former Senior Managing Director, Blackstone, an investment firm (since
(since 2004)

Current Public Company Boards

public company boards
HP
Royal Ahold Delhaize
Alcoa Corporation
Prior public
company
Barclaysboards

Prior Public Company Boards

Health Net, Inc.
Dollar Tree Inc.
Barclays
Ahold Delhaize
Mary Anne Citrino   Independent
Independent Director
Age:60
Director since:2015
63
HP Board Committees:
AUDIT Audit (Chair), FITFinance, Investment and Technology Committee
Director since: 2015

Qualifications:Qualifications

:

Prior Business and Other Experience

Managing Director, Global Head of Consumer Products Investment Banking Group, and Co-head of Health Care Services Investment Banking, Morgan Stanley (1986–2004)

Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

The Board benefits from Ms. Citrino’s extensive experience advising a broad range of clients in the consumer products industry through her roles at Blackstone. In addition, Ms. Citrino’s more than 30-year career as an investment banker provides the Board with substantial knowledge regarding business operations and strategy, as well as valuable financial and investment expertise. She also brings public company governance experience as a member of boards and board committees of other public companies.

Skills
Business and Management, Finance and Capital Allocation, International Business and Affairs, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy


CAPITAL
ALLOCATION


FINANCE


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


STRATEGIC
TRANSACTIONS; M&A


STRATEGY

20
logo_hp.jpg 


Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
pg21_photo-rick.jpg
Current role
Chairman, Privafy, Inc. (since January 2019)
Current public company boards
HP
Aptiv PLC
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Prior public
company boards
NCR Corporation
NXP Semiconductors N.V.
i2 Technologies, Inc.
Richard L. ClemmerIndependent

Current Role


Age: 71HP Board Committees: Audit, Finance, Investment and Technology Committee (Chair)
Director since: 2020
Qualifications:
Prior Business and Other Experience
Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director, of NXP Semiconductors N. V., a semiconductor company (since January 2009)*

Current Public Company Boards

HPN.V. (January 2009–May 2020)
NCR Corporation
NXP Semiconductors N. V.

Prior Public Company Boards

i2 Technologies, Inc.
Independent Director
Age:68
Director since:2020
HP Board Committees:
AUDIT, FIT

Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

Senior Advisor, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (May 2007-December2007–December 2008)
President and Chief Executive Officer, Agere Systems Inc. (October 2005–April 2007)

Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

Mr. Clemmer brings to the Board significant leadership experience in the high tech industry, including experience with semiconductor, storage, e-Commerce, and software companies, and brings valuable experience leading organizations through strategic transactions. In his roles at NXP Semiconductors and Agere Systems, Mr. Clemmer has overseenoversaw the successful execution of a number of key strategic transactions, including the acquisition and integration of several companies and business units.

Skills
Business and Management, Disruptive Innovation, Finance and Capital Allocation, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Operations, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


CAPITAL
ALLOCATION


FINANCE


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


OPERATIONS


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


STRATEGIC
TRANSACTIONS; M&A


STRATEGY


TECHNOLOGY

*NXP Semiconductors recently nominated a successor to succeed Mr. Clemmer as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director and this will be proposed by NXP Semiconductors’ Board of Directors at NXP Semiconductors’ annual general meeting of shareholders scheduled for May 27, 2020. Mr. Clemmer will remain a strategic advisor to NXP Semiconductors upon stepping down.

20www.hpannualmeeting.com


pg21-pic_lorese.jpg

Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Enrique Lores

Current Role

role
President and Chief Executive Officer, HP (since November 2019)

Current Public Company Boards

public company boards
HP

PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Prior Public Company Boardspublic


company boards
None
Enrique Lores   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


Age:54
Director since:2019
57
HP Board Committees:
N/A
Director since: 2019




Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

President, Imaging and Printing Solutions, HP Inc. (November 2015–October 2019)
Separation Leader, Hewlett-Packard Company (2014–October 2015)
Senior Vice President & General Manager, Business Personal Systems, Hewlett-Packard Company
(2013–2014)
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Customer Support & Services, Hewlett-Packard Company (2011–2013)
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Solutions Partner Organization, Hewlett-Packard Company (2008–2011)
Vice President & General Manager, Large Format Printing, Hewlett-Packard Company (2003–2008)
Vice President, Imaging & Printing Group, EMEA, Hewlett-Packard Company (2001–2003)
Experience in a variety of roles at Hewlett-Packard Company (1989–2001)

Other Key Qualifications

key qualifications

Mr. Lores’sLores’ international business and leadership experience, and his service in multiple facets of the HP business worldwide, provide the Board with an enhanced global perspective. Mr. Lores’sLores’ more than 2530 years of experience in the information and technology industry with HP, and his position as HP’s Chief Executive Officer, provide the Board with valuable industry insight and expertise.

Skills
Business and Management, Customer Experience, Disruptive Innovation, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Government and Government Affairs, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Operations, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


CUSTOMER
EXPERIENCE


OPERATIONS


TECHNOLOGY


STRATEGY


DISRUPTIVE
INNOVATION


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


STRATEGIC
TRANSACTIONS; M&A

2023 PROXY STATEMENT21


Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Yoky Matsuoka

pg22_photo-jami.jpg
Current Role

role
Senior Advisor, Lazard Ltd (since 2022)
Current public company boards
Division CEO, Panasonic Corporation (since October 2019)

Current Public Company Boards

HP
General Motors Company
Morgan Stanley
Prior public
company boards
EMC Corporation
Pivotal Software, Inc.

Prior Public Company Boards

Judith “Jami” Miscik   NoneIndependent
Independent Director

Age:47
Director since:2019
64
HP Board Committees: Audit, Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee
Director since: 2021

AUDIT, FIT



Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

CEO and Vice Chairman (2015-2022) and President Healthcare at Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet(2009-2015), Kissinger Associates, Inc. (“Alphabet”), a technology company (2018–October 2019)
Chief Technology Officer, Nest, Alphabet (2010–2015; 2017–2018)Global Head of Sovereign Risk, Lehman Brothers (2005–2008)
ExecutiveDistinguished 22-year career at the Central Intelligence Agency, including serving as the Deputy Director for Intelligence from 2002 to 2005
Director for Intelligence Programs, National Security Council (1995–1996)
Other key qualifications
Ms. Miscik brings to the Board significant experience in healthcare, Apple Inc.,international affairs, intelligence and risk assessment and a technology company (May 2016–December 2016)
Chief Executive Officer, Quanttus, a technology company (2015–2016)
Headvast understanding of Innovationthe geopolitical and Co-Founder, Google [X], Alphabet (2009–2010)
Academic experience including professorships at Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Washington (2000–2011)
MacArthur Fellow (2007)

Other Key Qualifications

Ms. Matsuoka is an accomplished executive and technologist who brings more than two decades of leadership experience to the HP Board. Throughoutmacroeconomic landscapes gained from her career, she has held innovation-centric roles in both Silicon Valleythe public and private sectors. In her role as CEO of Kissinger Associates, an international geopolitical consulting firm, Ms. Miscik developed strategies for clients operating in academiaoverseas environments and brings her strong backgroundadvises on geopolitical and macroeconomic risks. Prior to entering the private sector, Ms. Miscik built a distinguished 22-year career in management, strategyintelligence, ultimately serving as the Deputy Director for Intelligence at the Central Intelligence Agency.

Skills
Business and research & development to the Board.

Management, Finance and Capital Allocation, Government and Government Affairs, International Business and Affairs, Operations, Risk Management, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


ACADEMICS


DISRUPTIVE
INNOVATION


SCIENCE


STRATEGY



CUSTOMER
EXPERIENCE


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE


TECHNOLOGY


Proxy Statement21


pg22_photo-rucker.jpg

Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Stacey Mobley

Current Role

role
Director
Current public company boards
Director

Current Public Company Boards

HP

Prior Public Company Boards

International Paper CompanyCelanese Corporation
Hewitt Associates,Lennox International Inc.
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
Prior public
company boards
None
Kim K.W. Rucker   Independent
Independent Director

Age:74
Director since:2015
56
HP Board Committees: Audit, Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee (Chair)
Director since: 2021

HRC, NGSR


Qualifications:

Qualifications:
Prior Business and Other Experience

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Andeavor, an integrated marketing, logistics and refining company, and General Counsel of Andeavor Logistics LP, a midstream energy infrastructure and logistics company (2016-2018)
Executive Vice President, Corporate & Legal Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Kraft Foods Group, Inc., a food and beverage company (2012–2015)
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Advisor, Dickstein Shapiro,Chief Compliance Officer (2008–2012) and Corporate Secretary (2009–2012), Avon Products, Inc.
Senior Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer, Energy Future Holdings Corp. (formerly TXU Corp.) (2004–2008)
Former Partner in the Corporate & Securities group at Sidley Austin LLP, a law firm (2008–2016)
Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative OfficerOther key qualifications
Ms. Rucker is a seasoned business executive who brings to the Board decades of leadership and General Counsel, E.I. du Pont de Nemourscorporate governance, strategic transactions, and Company (“DuPont”),human capital experience. Through her roles at Andeavor, Kraft Foods Group, Avon Products and Energy Future Holdings and as a chemical company (1999–2008)
35 yearsboard member of several large public companies, she has substantial experience at DuPont (1973–2008) serving in a varietywide array of leadership roles

Other Key Qualifications

Mr. Mobley’s more than 35 years of legalbusiness matters, including those facing customer-driven and senior management experience at DuPont brings a deep understanding of governance, regulations and risk management including the government relations strategies of publicmarketing companies. He also brings public company governanceMoreover, her experience as a member of boardsformer chief legal executive and board committees of other publicpartner at an international law firm provides the Board with valuable insight on issues relating to complex mergers and private companies.

acquisitions, regulatory matters, law, corporate governance, internal and external communications, government affairs and community involvement activities.
Skills
Business and Management, Customer Experience, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Government and Government Affairs, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Risk Management, Strategic Transactions; M&A, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS


ROBUST BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE



OPERATIONS

22
logo_hp.jpg 


Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
pg23-photo_suresh.jpg
Current role
Director
Current public company boards
HP
Singapore Exchange Limited
Prior public company boards
None
Subra SureshIndependent

Current Role

Age: 66HP Board Committees: Audit, Finance, Investment and Technology Committee
Director since: 2015
Qualifications:
Prior Business and Other Experience
President, Nanyang Technological University autonomous global research university in Singapore (since January 2018)

Current Public Company Boards

HP(January 2018–December 2022)
Singapore Exchange Limited

Prior Public Company Boards

None
Independent Director
Age:63
Director since:2015
HP Board Committees:
AUDIT, FIT

Qualifications:

Prior Business and Other Experience

Senior Advisor, Temasek International Private Ltd., an investment company headquartered in Singapore (since September 2017) (September 2017–December 2021)
President, Carnegie Mellon University, a global research university (July 2013–June 2017)
Independent Director, of the Board, Battelle Memorial Institute, Ohio, an international nonprofit that develops and commercializes technology and manages laboratories for government customers (2014–2017)
Director, National Science Foundation, a federal agency charged with advancing science and engineering research and education (October 2010–March 2013)
Dean and the Vannevar Bush Professor of Engineering, School of Engineering (2007-2010)(2007–2010), and Professor (1993–2013), Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Other Key Qualifications

Mr.key qualifications

Dr. Suresh is oneholds the distinction of the few Americans to havehaving been elected to all three branches of the U.S. National Academies (Engineering, Sciences and Medicine) in recognition of his considerable scientific and technical accomplishments. Mr.Dr. Suresh’s experience as the president of two prominent research universities and his experience leading new entrepreneurship and innovation bring the Board valuable insights with respect to strategic opportunities and a robustdeep understanding of the organizational, scientific, and technological requirements of ongoing innovation.

Skills
Business and Management, Disruptive Innovation, Environmental and Social Responsibility, Finance and Capital Allocation, Government and Government Affairs, Human Capital Management, International Business and Affairs, Risk Management, Strategy, Technology, Cybersecurity and Science


ACADEMICS


FINANCE


SCIENCE


TECHNOLOGY






DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION


GOVERNMENT


STRATEGY


22www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

In addition to the information above, Annex B sets forth information relating to our Directors, Director nominees, and certain of our executive officers and other employees who may be considered “participants” in our solicitation under the applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules by reason of their position as Directors of the Company or as Director nominees or because they may be soliciting proxies on our behalf.

How We Are Selected

Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Director

The Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility (“NGSR”)NGSR Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for Director. The NGSR Committee, in consultation with the Chairman, regularly assesses the appropriate size of the Board and candidates and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. If vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the NGSR Committee considers various potential candidates for Director. Candidates may come to the attention of the NGSR Committee through current Board members, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. As part of the search process for each new director, the NGSR Committee actively seeks out diverse candidates to include in the pool from which director candidates are chosen. Identified candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the NGSR Committee and may be considered at any point during the year. As described below, the NGSR Committee considers properly submitted stockholder recommendations of candidates for the Board to be included in our proxy statement. Following verification of the stockholder status of individuals proposing candidates, recommendations are considered collectively by the NGSR Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting, which is generally the first or second meeting prior to the issuance of the proxy statement for our annual meeting. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a Director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the NGSR Committee. The NGSR Committee also reviews materials provided by professional search firms and other parties in connection with a nominee who is not proposed by a stockholder. In evaluating such nominations, the NGSR Committee seeks to achieve a balance of diverse knowledge, experience and capability on the Board. The NGSR Committee evaluates nominees recommended by stockholders using the same criteria it uses to evaluate all other candidates. In the case of Mr. Clemmer, a third-party professional search firm identified him as a potential director nominee.

The NGSR Committee also evaluated the Xerox nominees using the same criteria it uses to evaluate all other candidates, including the Board’s nominees, and concluded that the nominees recommended by the Board and named in this proxy statement collectively have a superior skill set in light of the needs of the Company.

Director Nominees and Director Nominees’ Experience and Qualifications

The Board annually reviews the appropriatedesired skills and characteristics requiredqualifications of Directors in the context of the current composition of the Board, our operating requirements and the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Board believes that its members should possess a variety of skills, professional experience, and backgrounds in order to effectively oversee our business. In addition,HP does not have formal refreshment mechanisms such as mandatory retirement age or term limits for directors; however, we actively monitor the tenure of our directors with a view that our average tenure should not exceed ten years and directors with greater than ten years of service should be closely evaluated. The Board believes that each Director should possess certain attributes, as reflected in the Board membership criteria described below.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines contain the current Board membership criteria that apply to nominees recommended for a position on the Board. Under those criteria, members of the Board should:

have the highest professional and personal ethics and values, consistent with our long-standing values and standards;
have broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education, technology or public service;

have the highest professional and personal ethics and values, consistent with our long-standing values and standards;

2023 PROXY STATEMENT

have broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education, technology or public service;

23

Corporate Governance and Board of Directorsbe committed to enhancing stockholder value and represent the interests of all of our stockholders; and

have sufficient time to carry out their duties and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience (which means that Directors’ service on other boards of public companies should be limited to a number that permits them, given their individual circumstances, to responsibly perform all Director duties).


Proxy Statement23


Tablebe committed to enhancing stockholder value and represent the interests of Contents

Boardall of Directors

our stockholders; and

have sufficient time to carry out their duties and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience (which means that Directors’ service on other boards of public companies should be limited to a number that permits them, given their individual circumstances, to responsibly perform all Director duties).
In addition, the NGSR Committee takes into account a potential Director’s ability to contribute to the diversity of background (such as race, gender, age and cultural background) and experience represented on the Board, and it reviews its effectiveness in balancing these considerations when assessing the composition of the Board. Although the Board uses these and other criteria as appropriate to evaluate potential nominees, it has no stated minimum criteria for nominees. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website athttps://investor.hp.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.default.aspx. In addition, our Bylaws also require that to be qualified to serve as a Director and to be eligible to be a Director nominee, each Director and Director nominee:

must not have been an officer or director of a company that is a competitor of HP within the prior three years; and

must not have been an officer or director of a company that is a competitor of HP within the prior three years; and

must not be a named subject of a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses) pending as of the date HP first mails the proxy materials that include the name of the nominee and, within the ten years preceding such date, must not have been convicted in such a criminal proceeding.

All members of the date HP Board are provided with opportunities for in-personfirst mails the proxy materials that include the name of the nominee and, remote Director education on an ongoing basis, coveringwithin the ten years preceding such date, must not have been convicted in such a variety of subjects relevant to HP. Recent topics have included strategy, innovation, people and culture development, best practices in governance and leadership, industry updates and technology trends.

criminal proceeding.

The Board believes that all the nominees named above are highly qualified and have the skills and experience required for effective service on the Board. All the nominees named above have indicated to us that they will be available to serve as Directors. In the event that any nominee should become unavailable, the proxy holders, Enrique Lores, Steven J. FielerJulie Jacobs and Kim M. Rivera,Rick Hansen, will vote for a substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board, unless the Boardif it decides to decrease the size of the Board.do so. If any substitute nominees are so designated, we will file an amended proxy statement or additional soliciting material that, as applicable, identifies the substitute nominees, discloses that such nominees have consented to being named in the amended proxy statement or additional soliciting material and to serve as directors if elected, and includes certain biographical and other information about such nominees required by the applicable SEC rules. As previously announced, Mr. Weisler is not standing for re-election at this annual meeting.

There are no family relationships among our executive officers and Directors.

Annual Review/Self-Evaluation

On an annual basis at or near the end of each fiscal year, each Director completes a self-evaluation designed to gauge the health of board function and composition. Topics addressed in the self-evaluation process include individual performance, performance of all committees on which the Director served during the fiscal year, performance of the Board as a whole, areas for improvement, accessibility of management, time allocation, and quality of materials. Directors also provide us with input on key focus areas for the Board in the upcoming fiscal year.

The NGSR Committee oversees the annual self-evaluation process in conjunction with input from the independent Chairman of

Annually, the Board and reviewseach Committee conduct a self-evaluation, overseen by the findings with the independent Chairman to assess board health. Each committee additionally reviews the consolidated committee self-evaluation results.

NGSR Committee.

Evaluation Process and Assessment
The NGSR Committee, working with the independent Chairman, determines the process, scope and contents of the Board’s annual self-evaluation. As part of this process, tailored questionnaires for the Board and each Committee are reviewed and approved by the independent Chairman and the Chair of the NGSR Committee prior to the distribution to each of the directors.
Topics include:
Board and Committee roles, effectiveness, and topical focus
Board and Committee composition and size
Board oversight of strategic priorities and risk matters
Access to management, experts and internal and external resources
icon_adown.jpg
Review and Discussion
Following completion of the questionnaires, the Chair of the NGSR Committee and independent Chairman meet individually with each director to solicit individual feedback. The results of the Committee evaluations are shared with the Chairs of each Committee on an anonymized basis. The Chair of the NGSR Committee then provides the NGSR Committee and the Board with a summary of responses to the questionnaires. Separately, each Committee Chair additionally reviews the applicable Committee self-evaluation results with members of the relevant Committee.
icon_adown.jpg
Feedback Incorporated
Policies and practices are enhanced as a result of the self-evaluation results.
24
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations

The policy of the NGSR Committee is to consider properly submitted stockholder recommendations of candidates for membership on the Board as described above underBoard. Following verification of the heading “Identifying and Evaluating Candidatesstockholder status of individuals proposing candidates, recommendations are considered collectively by the NGSR Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting, which is generally the first or second meeting prior to the issuance of the proxy statement for Directors.”our annual meeting. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a Director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the NGSR Committee. In evaluating such recommendations,nominations, the NGSR Committee seeks to achieve a balance of diverse knowledge, experience and capability on the Board andBoard. The NGSR Committee evaluates nominees recommended by stockholders using the same criteria it uses to considerevaluate all applicable membership criteria.other candidates. Any stockholder recommendations submitted for consideration by the NGSR Committee should include verification of the stockholder status of the person submitting the recommendation and the recommended candidate’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be addressed to our Corporate Secretary at HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304.

Stockholder Nominations

In addition, our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate Directors for consideration at an annual stockholder meeting and, under certain circumstances, to include their nominees in the HP proxy statement. For a description of the process for nominating Directors in accordance with our Bylaws, see “Questions and Answers—Voting Information.”

24www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

How We Are Organized

Current Committee Memberships

NameAuditFinance, Investment
and Technology
HR and CompensationNominating,
Governance and
Social Responsibility
Independent Directors
NameAuditFinance, Investment
and Technology
HR and
Compensation
Nominating, Governance
and Social Responsibility
Independent Directors
Aida M. Alvarez
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Shumeet Banerji
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Robert R. Bennett pg24_iconxauditcommittee-01.jpg
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Bruce Broussard
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Stacy Brown-Philpot pg24_iconxauditcommittee-01.jpg
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Stephanie A. Burns
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_boxg.jpg 
Mary Anne Citrino pg24_iconxauditcommittee-01.jpg
icon_boxg.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Richard L. Clemmer pg24_iconxauditcommittee-01.jpg
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_boxg.jpg 
Judith “Jami” Miscik
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Kim K.W. Rucker
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_boxg.jpg 
Subra Suresh pg24_iconxauditcommittee-01.jpg
icon_blueo.jpg 
icon_blueo.jpg 
Other Directors
Enrique Lores
Shumeet BanerjiChair
Robert R. Bennett  Chair
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
Stacy Brown-Philpot  
Stephanie A. BurnsChair
Mary Anne Citrino  Chair
Richard L. Clemmer  
Yoky Matsuoka
Stacey Mobley
Subra Suresh  
Other Directors
Enrique Lores
icon_blueo.jpg 
Member
icon_boxg.jpg 
Chair
pg24_iconxauditcommittee-01.jpg
Audit committee “financial expert”
Dion J. Weisler2023 PROXY STATEMENT25

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors— Member
pg27_photo-mary.jpg
Chair:
Mary Anne Citrino
Other members:
Robert R. Bennett
Stacy Brown-Philpot
Richard L. Clemmer
Judith “Jami” Miscik
Kim K.W. Rucker
Subra Suresh
Number of
meetings
: 13
We have an Audit Committee established in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing our financial reporting processes and the audit of our financial statements.
Audit Committee “financial expert”

Proxy Statement25


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Audit Committee

We have an Audit Committee established in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for overseeing our financial reporting processes and the audit of our financial statements. Specific duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee include, among other things:

Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

appointing,
Specific duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee include, among other things:
Independent registered public accounting firm
overseeing the workappointment, compensation, retention, and performance of evaluating, compensating and retaining the independent registered public accounting firm;
firm and discussing with the independent registered public accounting firm its relationships with HP and its independence,independence; and
periodically considering whether there should be a regular rotation of the accounting firm in order to assure continuing independence;
overseeingindependence.
Audit & non-audit services; financial statements; audit report
reviewing and approving the rotationscope of the independent registered public accounting firm’s lead audit, audit-related services and concurring partners at least once every five yearsrelated fees; and the rotation of other audit partners at least once every seven years in accordance with SEC regulations, with the Audit Committee directly involved in the selection of the accounting firm’s lead partner;
overseeing and
determining whether to retain or, if appropriate, terminate the independent registered public accounting firm.
Audit & Non-Audit Services;
Financial Statements;
Audit Report
reviewing and approving the scope of the annual independent audit, the audit fee, and other audit services;
preparing the Audit Committee report for inclusion in the annual proxy statement; and
overseeing our financial reporting processes and the audit of our financial statements, including the integrityeffectiveness of our financial statements.reporting processes and functions.
Disclosure Controls; Internal
Controlscontrols; internal controls & Procedures; Legal
Compliance
procedures; legal compliance

overseeing and reviewing our disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls, information and technology security policies, internal audit function, and corporate policies with respect to financial information and earnings guidance;

overseeing and

reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of HP’s cybersecurity, information and technology security, and data protection programs, procedures, and policies; and

overseeing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Risk Oversightoversight and assessment
overseeing and reviewing our significant strategic, enterprise and other risks facing HP and management’s approach to addressing these risks, including(including significant risks or exposures relating to litigation and other proceedings and regulatory matters that may have a significant impact on our financial statements;statements) and
discussing policies with respect management’s establishment of effective governance, programs, and processes to identify, assess, and mitigate such risks;
reviewing key functional and business risk assessmentareas, including specific critical risks identified by our enterprise risk management program; and risk management.
Related Party Transactionsoverseeing relevant related party transactions governed by applicable accounting standards (other than related-person transactions addressed byreviewing other risks relating to the NGSR Committee).
Annual Review/Evaluationannually reviewing the Audit Committee’s chartermatters described above and performance.management’s approach to addressing these risks.

The Board determined that Ms. Citrino, Chair of the Audit Committee, and each of the other Audit Committee members (Mr. Bennett, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Mr. Clemmer, Ms. MatsuokaMiscik, Ms. Rucker and Mr.Dr. Suresh) are independent within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and SEC standards of independence for directors and audit committee members and hashave satisfied the NYSE financial literacy requirements.
Audit Committee Financial Experts
The Board also determined that each of Mr. Bennett, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Ms. Citrino, Mr. Clemmer and Mr.Dr. Suresh is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC rules.

The report of the Audit Committee is included on page 42.

pages 44-45.
26www.hpannualmeeting.com
26
logo_hp.jpg 


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Finance, Investment and Technology Committee

The Finance, Investment and Technology (“FIT”) Committee provides oversight of the finance and investment functions of HP. The FITCommittee’s responsibilities and duties include, among other things:

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
pg28_photo-rick.jpg
Chair:
Richard L. Clemmer
Other members:
Robert R. Bennett
Stephanie A. Burns
Mary Anne Citrino
Subra Suresh
Number of
meetings: 6
The FIT Committee provides oversight of the finance and investment functions of HP.
Finance, Investment and Technology Committee

The FIT Committee’s responsibilities and duties include, among other things:
Treasury Mattersmatters
reviewing or overseeing significant treasury matters such as capital structure and capital allocation strategy, derivative policy, global liquidity, fixed income investments, borrowings and credit facilities, debt issuances and redemptions, currency exposure, dividend policy, share issuances and repurchases, employee benefit fund matters and plan performance, and capital spending.
M&A Transactionstransactions & Strategic
Alliances
strategic alliances
assisting the Board in evaluating investment, acquisition, enterprise services,overseeing and periodically reviewing with management, significant mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventureventures, strategic equity investments or other minority investments, strategic alliances, or similar transactions (“Strategic Transactions”); and divestiture transactions in which we engage as part of our business strategy from time to time and reporting and making recommendations to the Board as to scope, direction, quality, investment levels and execution of such transactions;
evaluating and revising our approval policies with respect to such transactions;
overseeing our integration planning and execution and the financial results of such transactions after integration;
evaluating the execution, financial resultsintegration.
Capital allocation
reviewing and integration of our completed transactions; and
overseeing and approving our strategic alliances.
Capitalization; Debt &
Obligations; Swaps
reviewing or overseeing ourcapital investing decisions, capital structure, and the allocation strategy;
overseeing our loansof free cash flow; and loan guarantees of third-party debt and obligations; and
annually
reviewing and approving certain swapsoverseeing the execution of HP’s strategic plans and other derivative transactions.
capital allocation strategies.
Technology Strategiesstrategies &
Guidance
guidance
making recommendations tooverseeing and periodically reviewing with management, the Board as to scope, direction, quality, incubation of, and investment levels in, our technology, and execution of our technology strategies;
and
overseeing the execution ofand periodically reviewing with management, technology strategies formulated by management;management related to Strategic Transactions and
providing guidance on other transactions, including HP’s or a third-party’s technology or intellectual property as it may pertain to, among other things, Strategic Transactions, market entry and exit, investments, mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, new business divisions and spin-offs, research and developmentR&D investments, and key competitor and partnership strategies.
Risk oversight and assessment
overseeing the execution of derivatives and financial risk hedging strategy;
assessing risk and return of financial investments and managing risk levels in the deployment of capital;
reviewing acquisition and integration risks associated with M&A transactions and strategic alliances; and
reviewing other risks relating to the matters described above and management’s approach to addressing these risks.

Proxy Statement
2023 PROXY STATEMENT27


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee

The NGSR Committee oversees, and represents and assists the Board (and management, as applicable) in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to, our corporate governance, Director nominations and elections, HP’s policies and programs relating to global citizenship and other legal, regulatory and compliance matters relating to current and emerging political, environmental, global citizenship and public policy trends. Specific duties and responsibilities of the NGSR Committee include, among other things:

Corporate Governance and Board Mattersof Directors
photo_ruckerk-11.jpg
Chair:
Kim K.W. Rucker
Other members:
Aida M. Alvarez
Shumeet Banerji
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
Bruce Broussard
Stacy Brown-Philpot
Judith “Jami” Miscik
Number of meetings: 5
The NGSR Committee oversees and represents and assists the Board (and management, as applicable) in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to our corporate governance, Director nominations and elections, HP’s policies and programs relating to global citizenship and other legal, regulatory and compliance matters relating to current and emerging political, environmental, global citizenship and public policy trends.
Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee





developing
Specific duties and responsibilities of the NGSR Committee include, among other things:
Board matters
establishing criteria for Board membership, identifying individuals qualified to serve as directors, and recommending to the Board the criteria for identifying and evaluating Director candidates and periodically reviewing these criteria;
identifying and recommending candidates to be elected or nominated for election as Directors at our annual meeting, consistent with criteria approved by the Board;
annually assessingdirectors, as well as director succession planning;
overseeing and reviewing the size, structure, functioning,composition, operation, and compositioncalendar of the Board and recommending assignments of Directors to Board committees and chairs of Board committees;
identifying and recruiting new Directors, establishing procedures for the consideration of Director candidates recommended by stockholders and considering candidates proposed by stockholders;
assessing the contributions and independence of Directors in determining whether to recommend them for election or reelection to the Board; and
periodically reviewing the Board’s leadership structure, recommending changes to the Board as appropriate and, if the Chairman of the Board is not independent, making a recommendation to the independent Directors regarding the appointment of the Lead Independent Director.
appropriate.
HP Governing Documents
governing documents & Corporate Governance
Guidelines & Other Policies
conducting a preliminary review of Director independence and the financial literacy and expertise of Audit Committee members, and making recommendations to the Board related to such matters;
developing and regularly reviewing corporate governance principles,guidelines & other policies
overseeing and reviewing our governance practices, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines;
reviewing proposed changes to our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Board committee charters;related policies, governance structures, and
director-led engagements with HP’s stakeholders concerning such matters.
ESG matters
establishingoverseeing significant strategies, policies, positions, and goals relating to global citizenship, sustainability, climate change, human rights, and digital equity, as well as the impact of HP’s operations on employees, customers, suppliers, partners, and communities worldwide;
reviewing HP’s annual “Sustainable Impact Report,” which addresses HP’s supply chain and environment and sustainability performance; and
overseeing the policies and procedures forprograms relating to, and the reviewway HP conducts, its government relations activities.
Risk oversight and approval of related-person transactions and conflicts of interest, including reviewing and approving all potential “related-person transactions” as defined under SEC rules.
assessment
Stockholder Rights
assessing and making recommendations regarding stockholder rights plans or other stockholder protections, as appropriate; and
reviewing stockholder proposals in conjunction with the CEO and recommending Board responses.
Public Policy Trends & Issuesreviewing emerging corporate governance issues and practices;
identifying, evaluating, and monitoring social, political, and environmental trends, issues, concerns, and risks;
monitoring legislative proposals and regulatory developments that could significantly affect the public affairs of HP;
and
overseeing the policiesreviewing other risks relating to the matters described above and the way HP conducts, its government relations activities; and
reviewing, assessing, reporting, and providing guidancemanagement’s approach to management and the full Board relating to activities, policies, and programs with respect to public policy matters and policies and programs relating to global citizenship, as applicable.
Annual Review/Evaluationaddressing these risks.annually reviewing the NGSR Committee’s charter and performance; and
overseeing the annual self-evaluation of the Board and its committees.

The Board determined that Mr. Banerji,Ms. Rucker, who serves as Chair of the NGSR Committee, and each of the other NGSR Committee members (Ms. Alvarez, Mr. Banerji, Mr. Bergh, Mr. Broussard, Ms. Brown-Philpot and Mr. Mobley)Ms. Miscik) are independent within the meaning of the NYSE director independence standards.

28www.hpannualmeeting.com
28
logo_hp.jpg 


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

The Human Resources and Compensation (“HRC”) Committee discharges the Board’s responsibilities related to the compensation of our executives and Directors and provides general oversight of our compensation structure, including our equity compensation plans and benefits programs. Specific duties and responsibilities of the HRC Committee include, among other things:

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
pg30_photo-burns.jpg
Chair:
Stephanie A. Burns
Other members:
Aida M. Alvarez
Shumeet Banerji
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
Bruce Broussard
Number of meetings: 8
The HR and Compensation (“HRC”) Committee discharges the Board’s responsibilities related to the compensation of our executives and Directors and provides general oversight of our compensation structure, including our equity compensation plans and benefits programs.
HR and Compensation Committee

Specific duties and responsibilities of the HRC Committee include, among other things:
Executive Compensation,
Stock Ownershipcompensation philosophy, peer group, design, &
Performance Reviews
performance reviews
reviewing the overall compensation philosophy and strategy with respect to HP’s executive officers and reviewing and approving short-term and long-term incentive plan design, structure and goals;
conducting annual performance evaluation of the CEO and recommending all elements of the CEO’s compensation to the independent members of the Board for their review and approval;
and
reviewing and approving goals and objectives relevant to other executive officer compensation, and evaluating performance based on evaluations undertaken by the CEO and reviewed by the HRC Committee and determining thetheir compensation of other executive officers in accordance with those objectives;
conducting annual performance evaluation of CEO; soliciting 360 degree feedback across organization;
reviewing performance feedback on executive team members;
approving severance arrangementsgoals and other applicable agreements and policies for executive officers; and
adopting and monitoring compliance with stock ownership guidelines for executive officers.
Non-Equity
Compensation Plans,
Incentive Plansobjectives.
Other compensation & Other
Employee Benefit Plans
employee benefit plans
overseeing and monitoring the effectiveness of non-equity-based benefit plan offerings, including but not limited to non-qualified deferred compensation, fringe benefits, and any perquisites in particular those pertaining to Section 16 officers, and approving any material new employee benefit plan or change to an existing plan that creates a material financial commitment by HP.
plan.
Director Compensation &
Stock Ownership
compensation
establishingoverseeing compensation policies and practices for service on the Board and its committees including annually reviewing the appropriate level of Director compensation and recommending to the Board any changes to that compensation; and
adopting and monitoring compliance with stock ownership guidelines for Directors.
director compensation.
Executive Succession
Planningsuccession planning & Leadership
Development
leadership development
reviewing senior management selection, andrecommending the appointment of corporate officers to the Board for approval, overseeing succession planning and leadership development, diversity and pay equity; and
drivingincluding guiding the CEO succession planning process in partnership with the Chairman and full Board.
People processes and culture, including diversity, equity and inclusion
Compensation
Consultants
engaging compensation consultants on various topicsreviewing employee engagement and cultural initiatives including key training and development programs, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs and results of the annual employee engagement survey; and
monitoring the key health metrics to understand market perspectives;
engaging compensation consultant for independent perspective on compensation programs;evaluate the workforce including workforce diversity, equity and
inclusion, pay equity, attrition and retention, talent and learning, employee engagement, key hires, and restructuring.
Risk oversight and assessment
assessing the independence of all advisors (whether retained by the HRC Committee or management) that provide advice to the HRC Committee, in accordance with applicable listing standards.
Risk Assessment; Other
Disclosure
overseeing, approving, and evaluatingwhether HP’s overall human resources and compensation structure,structures, policies, and programs, and assessing whether thesepractices establish appropriate incentives and leadership development opportunities for management and other employees, and confirming they do not encourage improper risk taking that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on HP;taking.
reviewing and discussing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and performing other reviews and analyses and making additional disclosures as required of compensation committees by the rules of the SEC or applicable exchange listing requirements; and
reviewing the results of stockholder advisory votes on HP’s executive compensation program and recommending to the Board or the NGSR Committee how to respond to such votes.
Annual Review/
Evaluation
overseeing the annual evaluation of the CEO with input from all non-employee Board members; and
annually evaluating the HRC Committee’s performance and charter.
People Processes &
Culture
reviewing employee engagement and cultural initiatives including key training and development programs (executive and manager training, unconscious bias), diversity and inclusion programs and results of the employee engagement survey; and
monitoring the key health metrics to evaluate the workforce including workforce diversity, key hires, turnover and restructuring.

Proxy Statement29


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

The Board determined that Dr. Burns, who serves as Chair of the HRC Committee, and each of the other HRC Committee members (Ms. Alvarez, Mr. Banerji, Mr. Bergh and Mr. Mobley)Broussard) are independent within the meaning of the NYSE standards of independence for directors and compensation committee members.

New Forefront

2023 PROXY STATEMENT29

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
About our Corporate Governance
Governance Practices
HP has a history of Governance: Board Oversightstrong corporate governance and we have always led by example, adopting changes in line with our commitment to the highest standards of ESG

HP continually seeks to improve and enhance its governance programs. This year, we are pleased to share for the first time an update on our Board’s involvement in our Environmental, Sustainability and Governance (“ESG”) efforts. HP is onegovernance. The following examples highlight some of the leaders in this space throughkey features of our Sustainability program, which includes Diversity & Inclusion, Corporate Sustainabilitycorporate governance policies and Environmental Impact.

practices, including updates we have recently made to strengthen our policies and practices:
Independent Board Chairman
Planet

The NGSR Committee oversees HP’s broad ESG strategy, including our areasSupermajority of focus, global citizenship policies, and sustainable supply chain programs; our executive leadership team then integrates this into our global business strategy. The Audit Committee monitors our progress towards our sustainability goals as part of its ERM program reviews.
independent directors
People

The NGSR Committee seeks to recruit directors of diverse backgrounds to lead the Board. The HRC Committee provides guidance and direction to our talent recruitment and retention strategies, including management succession planning, with a focus on ensuring our leadership represents the diversity of our workforce and customers worldwide. The Audit Committee’s oversight of our ERM program includes oversight of our global supply chain, which involves working with our suppliers to protect and empower all workers in our supply chain, not just HP employees.
Reasonable average director tenure
Community

Annual election of directors
TheMajority vote for directors in uncontested elections
Committee memberships limited to independent directors
Executive sessions of non-employee directors
Annual Board and the NGSR Committee are committedself-evaluations
Strong director and officer stock ownership guidelines
Director-shareholder engagement program
One share, one vote
Stockholder right to improving the communities in which we operate. This includes providing our leadership team with assistance in reaching outcall a special meeting (15% threshold)
Stockholder right to the communities we seek to impact and approving broad-based strategiesproxy access (3% threshold for corporate giving, including financial funding and employee engagement.3 years)
No poison pill

How We Govern and Are Governed

Board Leadership Structure

The HP Board continuouslyperiodically evaluates its leadership structure. Ourstructure, taking into account the evolving needs of the business and the interests of HP’s stockholders. The Board continues to believebelieves that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to currently separate the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles and for our Chairman to be independent. Currently, Mr. Bergh serves as our independent Chairman of the Board. The Board believes that Mr. Bergh is well suited to serve as Chairman given his significant managerial, operational and global experience. Our Board believes that our current structure, with an independent Chairman who is well-versed in the needs of a complex business and has strong, well-defined governance duties, gives our Board a strong leadership and corporate governance structure that best serves the needs of HP and its stockholders. The Board also believes that this structure enables Mr. Lores to focus his attention on our business strategy and operations. The Board will continue to evaluate its leadership structure on an ongoing basis and may make changes as appropriate to HP and its future needs.

Independent Chairman

pg31_photobergh.jpg
The independent Chairman has the following responsibilities:
oversees the planning of the annual Board calendar;
in consultation with the CEO and the other Directors, schedules, approves and sets the agenda for meetings of the Board and chairs and leads the discussion at such meetings;
chairs HP’s annual meeting of stockholders;
is available in appropriate circumstances to speak on behalf of the Board and for consultation and direct communication with major stockholders upon request;

stockholders;
30
www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

provides guidance and oversight to management;
helps with the formulation and implementation of HP’s strategic plan;
serves as the Board liaison to management;
has the authority to call meetings of the independent Directors and schedules, sets the agenda for, and presides at executive sessions of the independent Directors;
approves information sent to the Board;
assists the Chairs of the Board committees
reviews/is consulted in preparing agendas for the respective committee meetings;
works with the HRC Committee to coordinate the annual performance evaluation of the CEO;
works with the NGSR Committee to oversee the Board and committee evaluations and recommends changes to improve the Board, the committees, and individual Director effectiveness; and
performs such other functions and responsibilities as set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines or as requested by the Board from time to time.
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
Independent Chairman

30
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Executive Sessions

During fiscal 2019,2022, the Directors regularly met in executive session, including executive sessions of only the independent Directors. Throughout fiscal 2019,2022, Mr. Bergh served as independent Chairman. As such, Mr. Bergh scheduled and chaired each executive session held during fiscal 2019.2022. Any independent Director may request that an additional executive session be scheduled.

Board Committees also have regular executive sessions without management present.

Meeting Attendance
During fiscal 2022, the Board held six meetings, all of which included executive sessions. During fiscal 2022, we had the following four standing committees, which held the number of meetings indicated in parentheses during fiscal 2022: Audit Committee (13); FIT Committee (6); HRC Committee (8); and NGSR Committee (5). All the committee charters are available on our investor relations website at https://investor.hp.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx. Each incumbent Director serving during fiscal 2022 attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all Board and applicable committee meetings held during the period that he or she served as a Director.
Directors are encouraged to participate in our annual meeting of stockholders. Ten of our thirteen then-serving Directors attended our last annual meeting, held on April 19, 2022.
Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website athttps://investor.hp.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx,, provide that a substantial majority of the Board will consist of independent Directors and that the Board can include no more than three Directors who are not independent Directors. The independence standards can be found as Exhibit A to our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Director independence standards are consistent with, and in some respects more stringent than, the NYSE director independence standards. In addition, each member of the Audit Committee meets the heightened independence standards required for audit committee members under the applicable listing and SEC standards and each member of the HRC Committee meets the heightened independence standards required for compensation committee members under the applicable listing standards and SEC standards.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Director will not be considered independent in the following circumstances:

The Director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of HP, or an immediate family member of the Director is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of HP.
The Director has been employed as an executive officer of HP, its subsidiaries or affiliates within the last five years.
The Director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from HP, other than compensation for Board service, compensation received by a Director’s immediate family member for service as a non-executive employee of HP, and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service with HP that is not contingent on continued service.
(A) The Director or an immediate family member is a current partner of the firm that is HP’s internal or external auditor; (B) the Director is a current employee of such a firm; (C) the Director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who personally worked on HP’s audit; or (D) the Director or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on HP’s audit within that time.
The Director or an immediate family member is, or has been in the past three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of HP’s present executive officers at the same time serves or has served on that company’s compensation committee.
The Director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, HP for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.
The Director is affiliated with a charitable organization that receives significant contributions from HP.
The Director has a personal services contract with HP or an executive officer of HP.

Proxy Statement31


Table of ContentsHP, or an immediate family member of the Director is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of HP.

The Director has been employed as an executive officer of HP, its subsidiaries or affiliates within the last five years.
The Director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from HP, other than compensation for Board service, compensation received by a Director’s immediate family member for service as a non-executive employee of Directors

HP, and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service with HP that is not contingent on continued service.

(A) The Director or an immediate family member is a current partner of the firm that is HP’s internal or external auditor; (B) the Director is a current employee of such a firm; (C) the Director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who personally worked on HP’s audit; or (D) the Director or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on HP’s audit within that time.
The Director or an immediate family member is, or has been in the past three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of HP’s present executive officers at the same time serves or has served on that company’s compensation committee.
The Director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, HP for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues for such company’s last completed fiscal year.
The Director is affiliated with a charitable organization that receives significant contributions from HP.
The Director has a personal services contract with HP or an executive officer of HP.
For these purposes, an “immediate family” member includes a person’s spouse, parents, stepparents, children, step-children,stepchildren, siblings, mother andmother-and father-in-law, sonssons- and daughters-in-law, brothersbrothers- and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares the Director’s home.

In determining independence, the Board reviews whether Directors have any material relationship with HP. An independent Director must not have any material relationship with HP, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with HP, nor any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a Director. In assessing the materiality of a Director’s relationship to HP, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including consideration of the issues from the Director’s standpoint and from the perspective of the persons or organizations with which the Director has an affiliation, and is guided by the standards set forth above.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT31

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
In making its independence determinations, the Board considered transactions occurring since the beginning of fiscal 20172020 between HP and entities associated with the independent Directors or their immediate family members. In addition toThe Board considered that since the transactions described below under the heading “Fiscal 2019 Related-Person Transactions,” if any, the Board’s independence determinations included considerationbeginning of fiscal 2020, Mr. Bergh, Mr. Broussard and Dr. Suresh were employed by organizations that do business with HP. The amount received by HP or such other organization in each of the following transactions:

Current Directors:

Mr. Bergh has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Levi Strauss & Co. since September 2011. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with Levi Strauss & Co. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to Levi Strauss & Co., and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from Levi Strauss & Co., did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either company’s consolidated gross revenues.
Mr. Clemmer has served as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of NXP Semiconductors N.V. since January 2009. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with NXP Semiconductors N.V. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to NXP Semiconductors N.V., and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from NXP Semiconductors N.V., did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either company’s consolidated gross revenues.
Mr. Suresh has served as President of Nanyang Technological University since January 2018. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with Nanyang Technological University. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to Nanyang Technological University, and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from Nanyang Technological University, did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either entity’s consolidated gross revenues.
Ms. Matsuoka served as Vice President, Healthcare at Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet, from 2018 to October 2019. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with Google and Alphabet. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to Google and Alphabet, and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from Google and Alphabet, did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either company’s consolidated gross revenues.
Ms. Matsuoka has served as Division CEO at Panasonic since October 2019. HP has entered into transactions for the purchase and sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of its business during the past three fiscal years with Panasonic. The amount that HP paid in each of the last three fiscal years to Panasonic, and the amount received in each fiscal year by HP from Panasonic, did not, in any of the previous three fiscal years, exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either company’s consolidated gross revenues.
Each of Mr. Banerji, Mr. Bennett, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Dr. Burns, Ms. Citrino, Ms. Matsuoka, and Mr. Mobley, or one of their immediate family members, is a non-employee director, trustee or advisory board member of another company that did business with HP at some time during the past three fiscal years. These business relationships were as a supplier or purchaser of goods or services in the ordinary course of business.

last three fiscal years did not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either HP’s or such organization’s consolidated gross revenues. Additionally, the Board also considered that Mr. Banerji, Mr. Bennett, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Dr. Burns, Ms. Citrino, Mr. Clemmer, Ms. Miscik and Ms. Rucker, or one of their immediate family members, is a non-employee director, trustee or advisory board member of another company that did business with HP at some time during the past three fiscal years. These business relationships were as a supplier or purchaser of goods or services in the ordinary course of business.

As a result of this review, the Board has determined the transactions described above and below under the heading “Fiscal 2019 Related-Person Transactions,” if any, would not interfere with the Director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a Director. The Board has also determined that, with the exception of Messrs.Mr. Lores, and Weisler, (i) each of HP’s remaining Directors, including Ms. Alvarez, Mr. Banerji, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Bergh, Mr. Broussard, Ms. Brown-Philpot, Dr. Burns, Ms. Citrino, Mr. Clemmer, Ms. Matsuoka, Mr. MobleyMiscik, Ms. Rucker and Mr.Dr. Suresh, and (ii) each of the members of the Audit Committee, the HRC Committee and the NGSR Committee, has (or had) no material relationship with HP (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with HP) and is (or was) independent within the meaning of the NYSE and our Director independence standards. The Board has determined that Mr. Lores is not independent because of his status as our current President and CEO,CEO.
32
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Board Operations
Board Leadership
ChairmanCommittee Chairs
pg34_photo-bergh.jpg
pg34_photo-mary.jpg
pg34_photo-rick.jpg
pg34_photo-burns.jpg
photo_ruckerk1.jpg
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
Mary Anne Citrino
Audit
Richard L. Clemmer Finance, Investment and TechnologyStephanie A. Burns HR and CompensationKim K.W. Rucker Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility
Other members:
Aida M. Alvarez
Shumeet Banerji
Robert R. Bennett
Bruce Broussard
Stacy Brown-Philpot
Stephanie A. Burns
Mary Anne Citrino
Richard L. Clemmer
Enrique Lores
Judith “Jami” Miscik
Kim K.W. Rucker
Subra Suresh

Six meetings in
fiscal 2022
2022 areas of focus 

Corporate strategy, including mergers and acquisitions
Enterprise risk management
Supply chain resiliency
Diversity, equity and inclusion
Sustainable Impact and ESG goals and performance
Value Plan allocation, restructuring and long-term plan
Cybersecurity
Talent review, succession planning and human capital management
Board refreshment
Core and growth businesses
Macroeconomic, geopolitical and regulatory landscape
Board Oversight of Strategy
One of the Board’s primary responsibilities is overseeing management’s establishment and Mr. Weisler is not independent dueexecution of HP’s strategy and the associated risks. The full Board oversees strategy and strategic risk through constructive engagement with management. The diverse mix of highly relevant and complementary skills, experiences and backgrounds our directors possess helps facilitate strong oversight of HP’s management and HP’s strategy to his prior service as our Presidentadvance, disrupt and CEO until November 1, 2019 and his subsequent role as Senior Executive Advisor to the Company.

32www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Meeting Attendance

During fiscal 2019,transform. At least annually, management reviews with the Board held eleven meetings, nineHP’s overall corporate strategy and key commercial and strategic risks and the Board provides input to management. Throughout the year, the Board reviews HP’s progress against its strategic plan. In addition, throughout the year, the Board reviews specific strategic initiatives and provides additional oversight.

Board Oversight of which included executive sessions. Each incumbent Director serving during fiscal 2019 attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all Board and applicable committee meetings held during the period that he or she served as a Director. During fiscal 2019, we had the following four standing committees, which held the number of meetings indicated in parentheses during fiscal 2019: Audit Committee (13); FIT Committee (5); HRC Committee (6); and NGSR Committee (5). All the committee charters are available on our investor relations website athttps://investor.hp.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.

Directors are encouraged to participate in our annual meeting of stockholders. Ten of our eleven then-serving Directors attended our last annual meeting, held on April 23, 2019.

Board Risk Oversight

The Board, with the assistance of its committees, of the Board as discussed below, reviews and oversees our enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program. This enterprise-wide program is designed to enable effective and efficient identification of, and management’s visibility into, critical enterprise risks. It also facilitates the incorporation of risk considerations into decision making. The ERM program was established to clearly define risk management roles and responsibilities, bring together senior management to discuss risk, promote visibility and constructive dialogue around risk at the senior management and Board levels and facilitate appropriate risk response strategies. Under the ERM program, management develops a holistic portfolio of our enterprise risks by facilitating business and function risk assessments, performing targeted risk assessments and incorporating information regarding specific categories of risk gathered from various internal HP organizations. Management then develops risk response plans for risks categorized as needing management focus and response and monitors other identified risk focus areas. Management provides regular reports on the risk portfolio and risk response efforts to senior management, and to the Board and its committees as appropriate. The Board and the committees of the Board may also receive reports from external advisors such as outside counsel and industry experts to further understand critical risk areas.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT33

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
The Board also considers specific risk topics in connection with this process. For example, information and technology security is a critical part of our risk management program. HP has a dedicated Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”), whose team is responsible for leading HP’s information and technology security policies, standards, and processes. Additionally, HP employees and contractors are required to complete trainings that cover security and privacy best practices and company policies. The Board regularly receives updates from management regarding our information and technology security program and the CISO regularly provides reports directly to the Board or the Audit Committee.

Committee on these matters.

The Board oversees management’s implementation of the ERM program, including reviewing our enterprise risk portfoliorisks and evaluating management’s approach to addressing identified risks. VariousThe Audit committee has general oversight and the other Board committees also have responsibilities forcontribute to the oversight and management of risk management thatrisks, and supplement the ERM program, within their respective areas of responsibility, as follows:

BOARD
StaysInformed of Our Risk Profile
Considers Risk in Connection with Strategic Planning and Other Matters

Board
 Stays informed of risk profile and provides overall oversight and governance
Considers risk in connection with strategic planning and other matters

AUDIT

Risk oversight

FINANCE,
INVESTMENT AND
TECHNOLOGY

Financial risks and innovation opportunities

HR AND
COMPENSATION

Compensation risks and practices

NOMINATING,
GOVERNANCE
AND SOCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY

Risks associated with governance structure and processes

Audit
Financial reporting and processes
Selection and performance of independent auditor
Audit and non-audit services
Internal and disclosure controls and procedures
Internal audit staffing and performance
Cybersecurity, information and technology security, and data protection
Risk assessment and management
Finance, Investment and Technology
Treasury policy and operations
Liquidity
Capital allocation, investment, and shareholder return
Mergers and acquisitions
Growth and technology strategies
Risk assessment and management
HR and Compensation 
HR policy
Executive and director compensation
CEO and executive succession planning
Talent and leadership development
Diversity, equity and inclusion
Risk assessment and management
Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility 
Governance policies and practices
Board composition and tenure
Director recruiting
Public policy and government relations
Sustainability impact and social responsibility
Risk assessment and management
HP Management
HP Management advises the Board and its Committees of key risks and the status of ongoing efforts to address these risks

HP MANAGEMENT

HP Management advises

Spotlight on Board Oversight of ESG
The Board and its committees actively oversee HP’s Sustainable Impact strategy and related risks. Below we have included an update on our Board’s involvement in our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) efforts.
In many cases, committees will be the first level of oversight, although certain matters may be handled by the Board directly, or following initial review by a committee. The Board has ultimate oversight of ESG and Board committees of keySustainable Impact strategy, risks and opportunities.
icon_forefrontofgovernance.jpg
Climate Action
The NGSR Committee oversees HP’s progress on ESG policies and programs as well as risk and opportunities (shared with Audit Committee), especially for climate and environment. The Board receives regular updates on our progress toward our sustainable impact targets.
icon_forefrontofgovernance2.jpg
Human Rights
The NGSR Committee is responsible for oversight of human rights as well as the statusimpact of ongoing effortsHP’s operations on employees, customers, suppliers, partners and communities worldwide. The HRC Committee monitors policies and programs with respect to address these risks

human capital management, workforce diversity, equity, and inclusion, equal employment opportunity, pay equity.
icon_forefrontofgovernance3.jpg
Digital Equity
The Board and Committees provide input on broad-based strategies to accelerate digital equity and for corporate giving, including financial funding and employee engagement.

Proxy Statement33
34
logo_hp.jpg 


Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
TableOur Approach to ESG
Climate Action
Addressing Our Footprint
With a focus on carbon emissions, circularity, and forests, HP is taking a holistic approach to addressing climate change.
We are working to reduce climate impacts across our entire value chain, which includes our supply chain, our own operations, and customer use of our products and services. For example, with respect to carbon emissions, our goal is to achieve net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2040, with an interim goal to reduce our absolute value chain emissions 50 percent, compared to 2019 levels, by 2030. This target is in line with the latest climate science and the 1.5°C reduction pathways called for by the Paris Agreement.
chart-climate_action.jpg
Human Rights
Driving Impact Through Our Supply Chain
We work to improve labor conditions within supplier factories, tackle industry-wide challenges such as forced labor and conflict minerals, and build essential worker and management skills and capabilities.
We engage with suppliers in a wide range of ways to promote responsibility, including social and environmental assessments and on-site audits.
We are aiming to reach one million workers by 2030 through worker empowerment programs that will go above and beyond the typical risk management approach to seek positive changes through training and personal development.
In addition, for information about diversity, equity and inclusion at HP, please refer to “Our Approach to Human Capital Management.”
chart-humanrights.jpg
Digital Equity
Accelerating Digital Equity
The digital divide is the economic, educational and social inequalities that exist between those that have access to the hardware, connectivity, quality and relevant content, and digital literacy—and those who do not. Digital equity is the path for everyone, everywhere to have equal access to education, healthcare and economic opportunity. We believe digital equity will be achieved when every person has equitable and inclusive access to skills and knowledge, services and opportunities in the digital economy.
Our goal is to accelerate digital equity for 150 million people by 2030 through one or more of these key elements: hardware (e.g., laptop or printer), connectivity (e.g., access to the Internet), quality, relevant content (e.g., learning materials), and digital literacy (e.g., skills to use the technology). Our work contributes to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and focuses on four communities that are most likely to experience the digital divide: women and girls, people with disabilities (including aging populations), historically excluded and marginalized communities, and educators and practitioners.
chart-sustainable_impact.jpg
For more information on our sustainability goals, programs, and performance, we refer you to our annual Sustainable Impact Report, available on our website (which is not incorporated by reference herein).
2023 PROXY STATEMENT35

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Our Approach to Human Capital Management
Approximately 58,000 employees (including employees from our recent acquisition of Contents

Plantronics, Inc. (“Poly”)) worldwide power HP’s innovation, contributing unique perspectives and a growth mindset to create breakthrough technologies and transformative solutions. We are committed to fostering a diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplace that attracts, retains, and advances exceptional talent. Through ongoing employee development, comprehensive compensation and benefits, and a focus on health, safety, and employee well-being, we strive to support our employees in all aspects of their lives so they can do their best work—while learning, growing, and feeling engaged.

As part of our Future Ready plan announced in November 2022 to enable digital transformation, portfolio optimization and operational efficiency, HP anticipates workforce reductions of approximately 4,000 to 6,000 employees by the end of fiscal 2025. HP is committed to treating people with care and respect as part of this difficult process.
*Because we are in the process of integrating Poly, the following metrics do not include Poly employees.
The Board’s Role in Human Capital Management
Our Board, through the HRC Committee, oversees HP’s key human capital management strategies and programs and is responsible for, among other things:
reviewing employee engagement and cultural initiatives including key training and development programs, diversity, equity and inclusion programs and results of Directors

the annual employee engagement survey; and

monitoring key workforce health metrics including workforce diversity, key hires, turnover and retention and restructuring.
Management regularly updates the Board and the HRC Committee on the status of such initiatives and programs.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)
Innovation at HP comes from the diverse perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, and unique experiences of our employees. We strive to create an inclusive workplace where people bring their authentic selves to work and can reach their full potential.
Our commitment to DEI starts at the top with a highly knowledgeable, skilled and diverse board of directors. We are among the top technology companies for women in executive positions. Women represent 33.3% of HP’s full-time executive positions globally. We are committed to improving representation of women at HP overall, with an intentional focus on leadership and technical roles globally.
In fiscal year 2022, 46.4% of our U.S. hires were ethnically diverse. We continue to work on removing barriers for underrepresented employees by creating equitable programs, training and development opportunities to grow and promote our employees.
To ensure senior executive leadership embeds a strong focus on DEI, the CEO and his direct reports have individual performance goals tied to DEI under the Management by Objectives (“MBOs”) program. The Board has ongoing oversight of this program, which impacts executive compensation.
HP is committed to embracing a culture that not only denounces racism but is actively anti-racist, and to using HP’s platform, technology, and resources as a force for positive change.
pg36-piechart_women.jpg
piechart_diversity.jpg
36
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Pay Equity
We believe people should be paid equitably for what they do and how they do it, regardless of their gender, race, or other protected characteristics. To deliver on that commitment, we benchmark and set pay ranges based on relevant market data and consider factors such as an employee’s role and experience, and their performance. We also regularly review our compensation practices, both in terms of our overall workforce and individual employees, to make sure our pay is fair and equitable.
For the past six years, HP has reviewed employees’ compensation with the support of independent third-party experts to ensure consistent pay practices.
HP expanded its annual pay equity assessment in fiscal year 2022 — evaluated the 16 countries with our largest employee populations, representing approximately 85% of our global workforce. The independent analysis did not reveal any systemic issues.
Any areas of potential concern, considering what we would expect employees to be paid when evaluating their skills, qualifications, and experience were reviewed and addressed as part of our off-cycle compensation process.
Employee Engagement
We have focused on driving engagement in three focus areas:
Improving the Way We Work: Enhancing tools and processes to increase employee productivity and effectiveness.
Developing Our People: Bolstering learning and development to maximize career growth opportunities and creating an inclusive work environment where all can thrive.
Building Our Future: Driving innovation, agility, and employee alignment with HP’s strategy and direction.
We regularly collect feedback from employees to better understand and improve their experiences and identify opportunities to continually strengthen our culture. In fiscal year 2022, in response to our annual employee engagement survey:
pg37-employee_engagement.jpg
pg37-employee_engagement2.jpg
pg37-employee_engagement3.jpg
pg37-employee_engagement4.jpg
Talent and Learning
Our employees’ talent, diversity, and drive fuels HP. We provide employees with a wide range of development opportunities, mentoring. and coaching. Through collaborative learning experiences, employees build networks with subject matter experts, and use social learning tools to integrate development into daily routines and drive personal career growth.
In fiscal year 2022, 99% of employees participated in learning and development, and we estimate that employees on average spent approximately 30 hours engaged in such activities over the course of the year. The 2022 annual employee engagement survey revealed that 85% of employees felt HP actively supported their learning and development, with 81% believing that they have what is needed to build new skills and/or stretch beyond current capabilities.
Focus areas for learning and development this year included upskilling technical skills across the organization through a series of development opportunities focused on technical, digital, automation, service, and software skills. We also prioritized leadership development, including a new development program focused on increasing agility, expanded use of performance coaching, and a one-year journey for new managers to prepare them for their leadership career. We continued to develop the future leadership pipeline by investing in emerging and underrepresented talent through formal programs, mentoring, and sponsorship. Our programs focus on team development, the future of work, new business models, and opportunities to deepen inclusion and growth mindset practices.
To reinforce development for all employees, a key focus in fiscal year 2022 was the utilization of the Talent Development Planning tool which was launched mid fiscal year 2021 and was used by 86% of managers to create personalized talent development plans for team members with the goal of accelerating talent development and deepening the readiness of team members for additional opportunities.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT37

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Health, Safety and Wellness
The physical health, financial wellbeing, life balance and mental health of our employees are vital to HP’s success. Our environmental, health, and safety leadership team uses our global injury and illness reporting system to assess worldwide and regional trends as a part of quarterly reviews. Our manufacturing facilities continue to represent our most significant health and safety risks due to higher potential exposure to chemicals and machinery related hazards. Reducing and effectively managing risks at these facilities remains a focus, and injury rates continue to be low.
We also sponsor a global wellness program designed to enhance wellbeing for all HP employees.
Throughout the year, we encourage healthy behaviors across our five pillars of wellness – physical, financial, emotional, life balance, and social/community—through regular communications, educational sessions, voluntary progress tracking, wellness challenges, and other incentives. In addition to our regular annual wellbeing programs, we provide specialized programs and campaigns in line with employee needs at the time. This year we implemented the “90 Days to a Better You” campaign where we introduced new opportunities for employees to prioritize themselves and their own wellbeing, granting access to mindfulness apps, targeted mental health support and opportunities to take individual wellbeing assessments.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, one of HP’s top priorities has been the health, safety, and wellbeing of employees and their families. We’ve put in place global policies and protocols based on guidance from healthcare experts and public health leaders, and regularly review and update them to reflect the best, most current information available.
Hybrid Work Strategy
We continue to embrace hybrid ways of working across HP and in accordance with our flexible working guidelines adopted in July 2021. Hybrid Work at HP balances more workplace flexibility with structured time together to collaborate and connect in person at our HP sites. Our goal is to provide the ability to work seamlessly across a diverse ecosystem of workplaces, enabled by enhanced tools and technology designed to optimize productivity and collaboration.
Overall, we aim to cultivate a healthy, supportive and inclusive environment that enables employees to do their best work, while developing themselves and reaching their full potential.
See ‘Our employees’ section of our 2021 Sustainable Impact Report for more detailed information about our Human Capital programs (which is not incorporated by reference herein).
Compensation Risk Assessment

During fiscal 2019, Frederic W. Cook and Co., Inc.2022, Semler Brossy Consulting Group (“FW Cook”Semler Brossy”), independent compensation consultantsconsultant to the HRC Committee, conducted an annual risk assessment of our executive compensation program policies and processes as well as incentive and commission arrangements below the executive level. FW CookIn addition, management separately reviewed the administration and controls for incentive plans below the executive level.
Based on these reviews, the HRC Committee concluded that our compensation programs and practices doprogram does not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on HP, and that our compensation programs and practices reflectprogram reflects a balance in design, policies, management controls, and HRC Committee oversight that is consistent with market “best-practice” for mitigating potential compensation-related risk.

Code of Conduct

We maintain a code of business conduct and ethics for Directors, officers and employees known as Integrity at HP, which is available on our website athttps://investor.hp.com/governance/integrity-at-hp/default.aspx.default.aspx. If the Board grants any waivers from our Standards of Business ConductIntegrity at HP to any of our Directors or executive officers, or if we amend our Standards of Business Conduct,Integrity at HP, we will, if required, disclose these matters via updates to our website on a timely basis.

How We Communicate With You

In June 2022, the Board received its annual ethics training.

38
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Stockholder Outreach

Engagement

We believe that effective corporate governance should include regular, constructive conversations with our stockholders. Over the past year, the Board has continued to engageengaged with stockholders, including seeking and encouraging feedback from stockholders about our corporate governance practices by conducting stockholder outreach and engagement throughout the year. Our annual corporate governance investor outreach cycle, in which the Chair of the Board, Chair of the HRC Committee and other Directors typically participate, is outlined below.

34www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Our Investor Outreach Calendar of Scheduled Events

November 2018
Q4 2018 HP Inc. Earnings Conference Call
December 2018
2018 Wells Fargo Tech Summit
Barclays Global Technology, Media & Telecommunications Conference
January 2019
Engagement
Our annual director stockholder outreach program
In fiscal 2023, prior to the filing of the proxy statement, we conducted our annual outreach regarding our governance profile.
Other ways we engage
Investor Meetings at CES 2019Quarterly earnings calls
Citi 2019 Global Technology, Media & Telecommunications West ConferenceIndustry presentations and conference
2019 J.P. Morgan Tech Forum at CESCompany-hosted events and presentations
Securities analyst meeting
Who participated
Chairman of the Board
Chair of the HRC Committee
Other members of the Board
Senior Management
Investor Relations
Subject Matter Experts
How we engage
One-on-one and group meetings
in-person and virtually
Written and electronic communications
February 2019
Q1 2019 HP Inc. Earnings Conference CallWho we engaged
Fiscal 2022 - Annual Outreach
Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference~50%
of our outstanding stock during
fiscal 2022, as well as with proxy advisor firms.
Fiscal 2023 - Governance
Profile Outreach
~30%
of our outstanding stock.
Topics discussed
icon_topicsdiscussed.jpg
Strategy and Business PerformanceOur strategic focus on driving long-term value creation, disruptive innovation, as well as a purpose-driven culture and our multi-year plan to advance, disrupt and transform
March 2019
icon_topicsdiscussed2.jpg
Governance PracticesBoard composition, diversity and oversight and governance practices
icon_topicsdiscussed3.jpg
Executive CompensationStructure of executive compensation programs and focus on diversity, inclusion, talent development and culture
icon_topicsdiscussed4.jpg
ESG & Sustainable ImpactSustainable Impact strategy, human capital management, pay equity and diversity and inclusion
Other Ways HP Communicates with Stockholders
Daiwa Investment Conference Tokyo 2019
April 2019
pg39-graphic_otherwayshp.jpg
HP Inc. Annual Stockholder Meeting
2023 PROXY STATEMENTMay 201939

Q2 2019 HP Inc. Earnings Conference Call
Bernstein’s 35th Annual Strategic Decisions Conference (SDC)
Corporate Governance and Board of DirectorsJune 2019
Communications with the Board
2019 Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Technology Conference
August 2019
Q3 2019 HP Inc. Earnings Conference Call
September 2019
Citi 2019 Global Technology Conference
Deutsche Bank’s Technology Conference
October 2019
HP Securities Analyst Meeting*
HP Inc. Announces Fiscal 2020 Financial Outlook

*

Event attended by member(s) of the HP Board.

In fiscal 2019, we also conducted outreach regarding our governance profile as part of our annual investor outreach cycle in the early part of the year. Through this program, we met or spoke with institutional investors representing more than 40% of our outstanding stock during fiscal 2019 as well as with proxy advisor firms. In fiscal 2020, prior to the filing of this proxy statement, we conducted our fiscal 2020 outreach regarding our governance profile. Through this program, we met or spoke with institutional investors representing more than 30% of our outstanding stock as of December 31, 2019, as well as proxy advisor firms. For additional details, please see pages 78-79 detailing our previous stockholder outreach conducted regarding written consent, which can be found in the opposition statement to the stockholder proposal.

Proxy Statement35


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties can contact the HP Board by email atbod@hp.comor by mail at the HP Board of Directors, 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304.

All Directors have access to this correspondence. In accordance with instructions from the Board, the Secretary to the Board reviews all correspondence, organizes the communications for review by the Board and posts communications to the full Board or to individual Directors, as appropriate. Our independent Directors have requested that certain items that are unrelated to the Board’s duties, such as spam, junk mail, mass mailings, solicitations, resumes and job inquiries, not be posted. Communications that are intended specifically for the Chairman of the Board, other independent Directors, or the non-employee Directors should be sent to the e-mail address or street address noted above, to the attention of the Chairman of the Board.

Related-Person Transactions Policies and Procedures
Related-person Transactions Policy
We have adopted a written policy for approval of transactions between us and our non-employee Directors, Director nominees, executive officers, beneficial owners of more than 5% of HP’s stock, and their respective immediate family members where (i) the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or is expected to exceed $120,000 in a single calendar year and (ii) such related person has, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest in such transaction.
The policy provides that the NGSR Committee reviews transactions subject to the policy and decides whether to approve those transactions, subject to the standing pre-approvals discussed below. In doing so, the NGSR Committee determines whether the transaction is not inconsistent with the interests of HP and its stockholders. In making that determination, the NGSR Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate:
the extent of the related-person’s interest in the transaction;
whether the transaction is on terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances;
the benefits to HP;
the impact or potential impact on a Director’s independence in the event the related-person is a Director, an immediate family member of a Director or an entity in which a Director is a partner, 10% stockholder or executive officer;
the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; and
the terms of the transaction.
The NGSR Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the NGSR Committee to pre-approve transactions where the aggregate amount involved is expected to be less than $1 million.
A summary of any new transactions pre-approved by the Chair is provided to the full NGSR Committee for its review at each of the NGSR Committee’s regularly scheduled meetings.
The NGSR Committee has adopted standing pre-approvals under the policy for limited transactions with related-persons. Pre-approved transactions include:
compensation of executive officers that is excluded from reporting under SEC rules where the HRC Committee approved (or recommended that the Board approve) such compensation;
non-employee Director compensation;
transactions with another company with a value that does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other company’s annual revenues, where the related-person has an interest only as an employee (other than executive officer), Director or beneficial holder of less than 10% of the other company’s shares;
contributions to a charity in an amount that does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charity’s annual receipts, where the related person has an interest only as an employee (other than executive officer) or non-employee Director;
transactions where all stockholders receive proportional benefits; and
transactions with another publicly traded company where the related person’s interest arises solely from beneficial ownership of more than 5% of HP’s common stock and ownership of a non-controlling interest in the other publicly traded company.
A summary of new transactions covered by the standing pre-approvals relating to other companies (as described above) is provided to the NGSR Committee for its review in connection with that committee’s regularly scheduled meetings.
40
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Fiscal 2022 Related-Person Transactions
We enter into commercial transactions in the ordinary course of our business with entities for which our executive officers or non-employee Directors serve as non-employee Directors and/or employees, as well as with entities affiliated with beneficial owners of more than 5% of HP’s stock. We do not believe that any of our executive officers, directors, or 5% beneficial owners had a direct or indirect material interest in such commercial transactions.
How We Are Compensated

Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Guidelines

Non-employee Director compensation is determined annually by the independent members of the Board acting on the recommendation of the HRC Committee. In formulating its recommendation, the HRC Committee considers market data for our peer group and input from the independent compensation consultant retained by the HRC Committee. Mr. WeislerThe program was reviewed in 2022 for changes and the HRC Committee determined that the program was competitive and decided not to make any additional changes. Mr. Lores, as employeesan employee of the Company, dodoes not receive any separate compensation for theirhis HP Board service.

For the 2019 Board year, which began March 1, 2019 (and therefore approximates the period between annual stockholder meetings when non-employee Directors are regularly elected), each non-employee Director was entitled to receive an annual cash Board retainer of $105,000.

For the 2022 Board year, which began March 1, 2022 (and therefore approximates the period between annual stockholder meetings when non-employee Directors stand for election), each non-employee Director was initially entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $105,000.
Each non-employee Director also received an annual equity retainer of $220,000 for service during the 2022 Board year, with grants occurring the date of the annual stockholder meeting. Equity grants to non-employee Directors are intended to strengthen alignment with stockholder interests and to reinforce a long-term ownership view of the Company and its value. Retention is not the focus of equity grants for non-employee Directors, which is why such equity grants are not subject to service-related vesting.
The Chairman of the Board receives an additional $200,000 annual cash retainer in recognition of the greater duties that the position requires.
In addition to the regular annual cash and equity retainers, and the Chairman retainer described above, the non-employee Directors who served as chairs of standing committees during fiscal 2022 received additional cash retainers for such service.



*     Each non-employee Director also receives $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in excess of ten meetings per Board year, and $2,000 for each committee meeting attended in excess of a total of ten meetings of each committee per Board year.
Annual director compensation
piechart_annualdircomp.jpg
Additional cash compensation*
Chairman of the Board$200,000
Committee Chair Fees
Audit Committee$35,000
HRC$25,000
NGSR$20,000
Other Board standing committees$20,000
Non-employee Directors may elect to defer receipt of up to 50%100% of their annual cash retainer. Additionally,For fiscal 2022, three non-employee Directors elected to defer receipt of a portion of their annual cash retainer. In addition, in lieu of the annual cash retainer, non-employee Directors may elect to receive an equivalent value of equity either entirely in fully vested shares or in equal values of shares and stock options.shares. For fiscal 2019, two2022, four non-employee Directors elected to receive an equivalent value of equity in shares and stock options, and two non-employee Directors elected to deferlieu of cash for all or a portion of their annual cash retainer.

Each non-employee Director also received an annual equity Board retainer of $215,000 for service during the 2019 Board year, with regular grants on the date of the annual stockholder meeting. Under special circumstances, the annual equity retainer may be paid in cash. No annual equity retainer was paid in cash during fiscal 2019. Typically, the annual equity retainer is paid at the election of the Director either entirely in fully vested shares or in equal values of shares and stock options. The number of shares subject to the equity awards is determined based on the fair market value of our stock on the grant date, and the number of shares subject to stock option awards is determined as of the grant date based on a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula. Equity grants to non-employee Directors are primarily intended to strengthen alignment with stockholder interests and to reinforce a long-term ownership view of the Company and its value. Retention is not the focus of equity grants for non-employee Directors and could cause entrenchment, which is why service-related vesting on equity awards was eliminated in July 2017.retainers. Non-employee Directors may elect to defer the settlement of shares received as part of the program until either (a) the first to occur of the Director’s death, disability (as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)) or when the non-employee Director no longer serves as a member of the HP Board (a “Separation From Service” as defined in Section 409A of the Code) or (b) April 1 of a given year; however, non-employee Directors may not defer the issuance of shares received upon the exercise of their stock options.

The Chairman of the Board receives an additional $200,000 annual cash retainer in recognition of the greater duties that the position requires. In addition to the regular annual cash and equity retainers, and the Chairman retainer described above, the non-employee Directors who served as chairs of standing committees during fiscal 2019 received cash retainers for such service. The Board approved annual cash retainers for committee chairs as follows for chair service during fiscal 2019:

$35,000 for the Audit Committee Chair;
$25,000 for the HRC Committee Chair;

$20,000 for the Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee Chair; and

$20,000 for Chairs of other Board standing committees.


36www.hpannualmeeting.com


year.

Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Each non-employee Director also receives $2,000 for Board meetings attended in excess of ten meetings per Board year (which begins in March and ends the following February), and $2,000 for each committee meeting attended in excess of a total of ten meetings of each committee per Board year.

Non-employee Directors are reimbursed for their expenses in connection with attending Board meetings, including expenses related to spouses when spouses are invited to attend Board events, and they may use the Company aircraft for travel to and from Board meetings and other Company events.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT41

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
Fiscal 20192022 Non-Employee Director Compensation
Name(1)   Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash(2)
($)
   Stock
Awards(3)
($)
   Option
Awards(3)
($)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
   Total
($)
Aida Alvarez$104,928$ 215,003$$$ 319,931
Shumeet Banerji$123,253$215,003$$$338,256
Robert R. Bennett$125,253$215,003$$$340,256
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh$199,863$160,017$ 160,002$$519,882
Stacy Brown-Philpot$106,928$215,003$$$321,931
Stephanie A. Burns$128,250$215,003$$$343,253
Mary Anne Citrino$142,243$107,502$107,501$$357,246
Yoky Matsuoka$82,418$344,182$$$426,600
Stacey Mobley$104,928$215,003$$$319,931
Subra Suresh$106,928$215,003$$$321,931
Dion J. Weisler(4)$$$$$
(1)Mr. Clemmer was appointed to our Board during our Fiscal 2020 year. Accordingly, he did not receive any compensation during Fiscal 2019.
(2)For purposes of determining Director compensation, the Board year begins in March and ends the following February, which does not coincide with our November through October fiscal year. Cash amounts included in the table above represent the portion of the annual retainers and committee chair fees earned with respect to service during fiscal 2019, as well as any additional meeting fees paid during fiscal 2019.
Name
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash(1)
($)
Stock
Awards(2)
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total Compensation
($)
Aida Alvarez105,000220,030— 325,030
Shumeet Banerji20,000325,035— 345,035
Robert R. Bennett125,000220,030— 345,030
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh200,000325,035— 525,035
Bruce Broussard105,000220,030— 325,030
Stacy Brown-Philpot111,000220,030— 331,030
Stephanie A. Burns130,000220,030— 350,030
Mary Anne Citrino75,904325,035— 400,939
Richard L. Clemmer— 325,035— 325,035
Judith “Jami” Miscik111,000220,030— 331,030
Kim K.W. Rucker(3)
100,301283,324— 383,625
Subra Suresh111,000220,030— 331,030
Enrique Lores(4)
— — — — 
(1)For purposes of determining Director compensation, the Board year begins in March and ends the following February, which does not coincide with our November through October fiscal year. Cash amounts included in the table above represent the portion of the regular annual retainers and committee chair retainers earned with respect to service during fiscal 2022, as well as any additional meeting fees paid during fiscal 2022. This also includes cash earned in the period described, receipt of which was deferred by Director election into the 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which provides that Directors may elect when to receive their deferred cash annual retainer. See “Additional Information about Fees Earned or Paid in Cash in Fiscal 2019” below.(3)Represents the grant date fair value of stock awards and option awards granted in fiscal 2019 calculated in accordance with applicable accounting standards relating to share-based payment awards. For awards of shares, that amount is calculated by multiplying the closing price of HP’s stock on the date of grant by the number of shares awarded. For elective options, that amount is calculated by multiplying the Black-Scholes-Merton value determined as of the date of grant by the number of options awarded. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the value of the stock awards, refer to Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019, as filed with the SEC on December 12, 2019. See “Additional Information about Non-Employee Director Equity Awards” below.(4)Mr. Weisler served as President and CEO of HP until November 1, 2019, the first day of our 2020 fiscal year. Accordingly, he did not receive compensation for his Board service during Fiscal 2019.
Additional Information about Fees Earned or Paid in Cash in Fiscal 20192022” below. Any amounts elected to be received as HP stock in lieu of cash are reflected in the Stock Awards column. Mr. Banerji, Mr. Bergh, Mr. Clemmer, and Ms. Citrino elected to receive stock in lieu of cash for all or a portion of their annual cash retainers earned in fiscal 2022.
Name   Annual
Retainers(a)
($)
   Committee
Chair and
Chairman
Fees(b)
($)
   Additional
Meeting
Fees(c)
($)
   Total
($)
Aida Alvarez  $104,928 $0 $0$104,928
Shumeet Banerji$104,928$18,325$0$123,253
Robert R. Bennett$104,928$18,325$2,000$125,253
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh$0$199,863$0$199,863
Stacy Brown-Philpot$104,928$0$2,000$106,928
Stephanie A. Burns$104,928$23,322$0$128,250
Mary Anne Citrino$104,928$33,315$4,000$142,243
Yoky Matsuoka$82,418$0$0$82,418
Stacey Mobley$104,928$0$0$104,928
Subra Suresh$104,928$0$2,000$106,928
(a)The Board year begins in March and ends the following February, which does not coincide with HP’s November through October fiscal year. The dollar amounts shown include cash annual retainers earned for service during the last four months of the March 2018 through February 2019 Board year and cash annual retainers earned for service during the first eight months of the March 2019 through February 2020 Board year. This also includes cash earned in the period described that was deferred by Director election into the 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which provides that Directors may elect when to receive their deferred cash annual retainer. Directors may not receive their deferred cash annual retainer earlier than January 2022. In the case of a termination of service, Directors can elect to receive the deferred money in the January following the termination of service if the date occurs prior to the specified distribution year elected.
(b)Committee chair fees are calculated based on service during each Board term. The dollar amounts shown include such fees earned for service during the last four months of the March 2018 through February 2019 Board term and fees earned for service during the first eight months of the March 2019 through February 2020 Board term.
(c)Additional meeting fees are calculated based on the number of designated Board meetings and the number of committee meetings attended during each Board term. The dollar amounts shown include any additional meeting fees paid during fiscal 2019 for service in the 2018 Board term ending February 2019. Additional meeting fees for the 2019 Board term, if any, will be paid during fiscal 2020.

Proxy Statement37


Table(2)Represents the grant date fair value of Contents

Boardstock awards granted in fiscal 2022 calculated in accordance with applicable accounting standards relating to share-based payment awards. For director stock awards, the number is calculated by multiplying the closing price of Directors

AdditionalHP’s stock on the date of grant by the number of shares awarded. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the value of HP’s stock-based compensation, refer to Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC on December 6, 2022. See “Additional Information about Non-Employee Director Equity Awards” below.

(3)Ms. Rucker joined the Board on November 16, 2021. For Ms. Rucker’s partial first year of Board service, her annual cash retainer was pro-rated and paid in the form of cash and her annual equity retainer was pro-rated and paid in the form of fully vested shares.
(4)Mr. Lores has been serving as President and CEO of HP from November 1, 2019. He does not receive compensation for his Board service.
Additional Information About Fees Earned or Paid in Cash in Fiscal 2022
Name
Annual
Retainers(a)
($)
Committee Chair
and Chairman
Fees(b)
($)
Additional
Meeting Fees
($)
Total
($)
Aida Alvarez105,000— — 105,000
Shumeet Banerji— 20,000— 20,000
Robert R. Bennett105,00020,000— 125,000
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh— 200,000— 200,000
Bruce Broussard105,000— — 105,000
Stacy Brown-Philpot105,000— 6,000111,000
Stephanie A. Burns105,00025,000-130,000
Mary Anne Citrino34,90435,0006,00075,904
Richard L. Clemmer— — — — 
Judith “Jami” Miscik105,000— 6,000111,000
Kim K.W. Rucker(c)
100,301— — 100,301
Subra Suresh105,000— 6,000111,000
Enrique Lores— — — — 
42
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
(a)The Board year begins in March and ends the following February, which does not coincide with HP’s November through October fiscal year. The dollar amounts shown include cash annual retainers earned for service during fiscal 2022 (i.e., the last four months of the March 2021 through February 2022 Board year and the first eight months of the March 2022 through February 2023 Board year). This also includes cash earned in the period described, receipt of which was deferred by Director election into the 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which provides that Directors may elect when to receive their deferred cash annual retainer. Directors may not receive their deferred cash annual retainer earlier than January 2025. In the case of a termination of service, Directors can elect to receive the deferred money in the January following the termination of service if the date occurs prior to the specified distribution year elected.
(b)Committee chair fees are calculated based on service during each Board year. The dollar amounts shown include such fees earned for service during the last four months of the March 2021 through February 2022 Board year and fees earned for service during the first eight months of the March 2022 through February 2023 Board year.
(c)For Ms. Rucker’s partial first year of Board service, her annual cash retainer was pro-rated.
Additional Information About Non-Employee Director Equity Awards

The following table provides additional information about non-employee Director equity awards, including the stock awards and elective options made to non-employee Directors during fiscal 2019,2022, the grant date fair value of each of those awards and the number of stock awards and option awards outstanding as of the end of fiscal 2019:

Name   Stock Awards
Granted During
Fiscal 2019
(#)
   Option
Awards
Granted
During
Fiscal 2019
(#)
   Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
Granted
During
Fiscal 2019(a)
($)
   Stock Awards
Outstanding
at Fiscal
Year End(b)
(#)
   Option Awards
Outstanding at
Fiscal Year End
(#)
Aida Alvarez10,7020$215,00311,4020
Shumeet Banerji10,7020$215,00300
Robert R. Bennett10,7020$215,00310,8750
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh7,96538,930$320,01931,073146,148
Stacy Brown-Philpot10,7020$215,00351,6630
Stephanie A. Burns10,7020$215,00320,9660
Mary Anne Citrino5,35126,156$215,00333,506159,671
Yoky Matsuoka17,1380$344,18200
Stacey Mobley10,7020$215,00351,6630
Subra Suresh10,7020$215,00319,2950
(a)Represents the grant date fair value of stock awards and elective options granted in fiscal 2019 calculated in accordance with applicable accounting standards. For stock awards, that number is calculated by multiplying the closing price of HP’s stock on the date of grant by the number of shares awarded. For elective options, that amount is calculated by multiplying the Black-Scholes-Merton value determined as of the date of grant by the number of options awarded. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the value of the stock awards, refer to Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019, as filed with the SEC on December 12, 2019.
(b)Includes dividend equivalent units accrued with respect to share awards granted in fiscal 2019 and RSUs granted in previous years that have been deferred at the election of the Director.

2022:

Name
Stock Awards
Granted During
Fiscal 2022
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value of Stock
Awards
Granted During
Fiscal 2022(a)
($)
Stock Awards
Outstanding
at Fiscal
Year End(b)
(#)
Option Awards
Outstanding at
Fiscal Year End
(#)
Aida Alvarez5,687220,03028,027— 
Shumeet Banerji8,401325,035— — 
Robert R. Bennett5,687220,03040,245— 
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh8,401325,03568,349146,148
Bruce Broussard5,687220,030— — 
Stacy Brown-Philpot5,687220,03084,735— 
Stephanie A. Burns5,687220,03051,284— 
Mary Anne Citrino8,401325,03567,653159,671
Richard L. Clemmer8,401325,03534,401— 
Judith “Jami” Miscik5,687220,030— — 
Kim K.W. Rucker(c)
7,715283,3247,876— 
Subra Suresh5,687220,03021,007— 
(a)Represents the grant date fair value of stock awards granted in fiscal 2022 calculated in accordance with applicable accounting standards. For director stock awards, the number is calculated by multiplying the closing price of HP’s stock on the date of grant by the number of shares awarded. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the value of HP’s stock-based compensation, refer to Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC on December 6, 2022.
(b)Includes dividend equivalent units accrued with respect to share awards granted in fiscal 2022 and RSUs granted in previous years that have been deferred at the election of the Director.
(c)For Ms. Rucker’s partial first year of Board service, her annual equity retainer was pro-rated and paid in the form of fully vested shares.
Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Under our stock ownership guidelines, non-employee Directors are required to accumulate, within five years of election to the Board, shares of HP’s stock equal in value to at least five times the amount of the regular annual cash Board retainer. Shares counted toward these guidelines include any shares held by the Director directly or indirectly, including deferred vestedstock awards.

All

At the end of fiscal 2022, all non-employee Directors with more than five years of service have met our stock ownership guidelines and all non-employee Directors with less than five years of service have either met or are on track to meet our stock ownership guidelines within the required time based on current trading prices of HP’s stock. See “Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” on page 75 of this proxy statement.

38www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL NO. 1
Election of Directors
2023 PROXY STATEMENT43

The Board recommends a voteFORthe election of all of the Director nominees listed above.
Audit Matters

The Board currently consists of 13 Directors. On the recommendation of the NGSR Committee, the Board has nominated the 12 persons named above for election as Directors this year, each to serve for a one-year term and until the Director’s successor is elected and qualified or, if earlier, until his or her resignation or removal. Mr. Weisler is not standing for re-election at this annual meeting, and the Board has determined that the size of the Board will be reduced to 12 Directors at the time of the annual meeting.

Our Board recommends using the enclosed WHITE proxy card to vote FOR the election of all of the Board’s 12 Director nominees listed above.

Xerox has notified us of its intent to nominate a slate of 12 nominees for election as Directors at the annual meeting in opposition to the nominees proposed by our Board. Our Board does not endorse any Xerox nominee and unanimously recommends that you disregard any blue proxy card that may be sent to you by Xerox. Voting to “withhold” with respect to any of Xerox’s nominees on its proxy card is not the same as voting FOR our Board’s nominees, because a vote to “withhold” with respect to any of Xerox’s nominees on its proxy card will revoke any previous proxy submitted by you, including any vote you may have made for our Board’s nominees. If you have previously voted using a blue proxy card sent to you by Xerox, you may change your vote by voting via the Internet or by telephone by following the easy instructions provided on the enclosed WHITE proxy card. You may also sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card to the address indicated on the card, but we strongly encourage you to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet. Only the latest validly executed proxy that you submit will be counted.

Vote Required

Our Bylaws provide that each director is elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the nominee, except that where the secretary of the Company receives a notice that a stockholder has nominated a person for election to the Board in compliance with our Bylaws (and the notice is not withdrawn), all Directors are to be elected under a plurality voting standard. Under a plurality voting standard, the 12 nominees receiving the highest number of FOR votes will be elected. Accordingly, because Xerox has notified us that it intends to nominate a slate of 12 nominees in opposition to the nominees proposed by our Board and named in this proxy statement, the 12 nominees receiving the highest number of FOR votes will be elected as Directors at the annual meeting. Votes withheld and broker non-votes, if any, are not votes cast and will not be counted for purposes of determining the nominee receiving the highest number of FOR votes.

If you sign your WHITE proxy card but do not give instructions with respect to voting for Directors, your shares will be voted by Enrique Lores, Steven J. Fieler and Kim M. Rivera, as proxy holders, FOR the election of all 12 Board nominees. If you wish to give specific instructions with respect to voting for Directors, you may do so by indicating your instructions when you vote via Internet or by telephone, or on your WHITE proxy card or voting instruction form.

Governance Highlights

Governance Practices

HP’s corporate governance policies and practices are continuously evolving – from our time as Hewlett-Packard Company to our new identity as HP Inc., we have always led by example, adopting changes in line with our commitment to the highest standards of governance. Stockholder input has been key to our progression and as we continue to evolve our corporate governance policies and practices, we will continue to solicit feedback from our stockholders regarding our governance profile. The following examples highlight some of the key features of our corporate governance policies and practices, including updates we have recently made to strengthen our policies and practices:

Our Bylaws provide our stockholders with a proxy access right.


Proxy Statement39


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

All members of our committees are independent.

Our stockholders owning 15% or more of our common stock have a right to call special meetings. We lowered this right from 25% after engaging with our stockholders on what rights to act outside of the annual meeting they would prefer.

Directors are elected annually by majority vote in uncontested Director elections.

We have adopted a policy whereby any incumbent Director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested Director elections will tender his or her offer of resignation.

We maintain a close, effective dialogue with our stockholders through an ongoing stockholder outreach program.

Non-employee Directors are expected to own Company stock equal to at least five times their annual cash Board retainer within five years of joining the Board.

We have evaluated our governance practices against the Corporate Governance Principles for U.S. Listed Companies published by the Investor Stewardship Group (“ISG”), a collective of some of the largest U.S.-based institutional investors and global asset managers, and we believe that our governance policies and practices are consistent with the ISG principles. The following table shows how certain of our key governance practices align with the ISG principles:


ISG Principle

HP Governance Policy or Practice

Principle 1:Boards are accountable to stockholders.
Annual election of each Director, for a one-year term
Proxy access that allows stockholder to nominate Directors
Policy whereby any incumbent Director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested Director elections will tender his or her offer of resignation
Annual stockholder outreach program that typically includes the Chair of the Board, the Chair of the HRC Committee and other Directors
Extensive disclosure of our corporate governance and Board practices
Principle 2:Stockholders should be entitled to voting rights in proportion to their economic interest.
One share, one vote
Principle 3:Boards should be responsive to stockholders and be proactive in order to understand their perspectives.
Directors participate in our stockholder outreach programs
Directors are available for stockholder engagement outside our engagement programs
Many Directors participate in and attend our annual meeting, at which management and those Directors present respond to each stockholder question
Principle 4:Boards should have a strong, independent leadership structure.
Independent Chair of the Board, with clearly defined responsibilities
Structure for a Lead Independent Director if the Chair is not independent
Robust independent key committees and other structures for facilitating contribution of independent Directors
Principle 5:Boards should adopt structures and practices that enhance their effectiveness.
11 of our 12 Director nominees are independent, with our Director nominees representing diverse backgrounds, skills and experiences
Each Board committee is fully independent
Track record of open dialogue between the Board and management
Robust annual self-evaluation program
Principle 6:Boards should develop management incentive structures that are aligned with the long-term strategy of the company.
Performance-oriented long-term incentive compensation mix with metrics that support our long-term strategy
Combination of short- and long-term performance goals
Executive and Director share ownership requirements

40www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

Related-Person Transactions Policies and Procedures

Related Person Transactions Policy

We have adopted a written policy for approval of transactions between us and our non-employee Directors, Director nominees, executive officers, beneficial owners of more than 5% of HP’s stock, and their respective immediate family members where the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or is expected to exceed $100,000 in a single calendar year.

The policy provides that the NGSR Committee reviews certain transactions subject to the policy and decides whether to approve or ratify those transactions. In doing so, the NGSR Committee determines whether the transaction is in the best interests of HP. In making that determination, the NGSR Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate:

the extent of the related-person’s interest in the transaction;

whether the transaction is on terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances;

the benefits to HP;

the impact or potential impact on a Director’s independence in the event the related person is a Director, an immediate family member of a Director or an entity in which a Director is a partner, 10% stockholder or executive officer;

the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; and

the terms of the transaction.

The NGSR Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the NGSR Committee to pre-approve or ratify transactions where the aggregate amount involved is expected to be less than $1 million.

A summary of any new transactions pre-approved by the Chair is provided to the full NGSR Committee for its review at each of the NGSR Committee’s regularly scheduled meetings.

The NGSR Committee has adopted standing pre-approvals under the policy for limited transactions with related persons. Pre-approved transactions include:

compensation of executive officers that is excluded from reporting under SEC rules where the HRC Committee approved (or recommended that the Board approve) such compensation;

non-employee Director compensation;

transactions with another company with a value that does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other company’s annual revenues, where the related-person has an interest only as an employee (other than executive officer), Director or beneficial holder of less than 10% of the other company’s shares;

contributions to a charity in an amount that does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charity’s annual receipts, where the related person has an interest only as an employee (other than executive officer) or non-employee Director; and

transactions where all stockholders receive proportional benefits.

A summary of new transactions covered by the standing pre-approvals relating to other companies (as described above) is provided to the NGSR Committee for its review in connection with that committee’s regularly scheduled meetings.

Fiscal 2019 Related-Person Transactions

We enter into commercial transactions with many entities for which our executive officers or non-employee Directors serve as non-employee Directors and/or employees in the ordinary course of our business. All those transactions were pre-approved transactions as defined above. There have otherwise been no related-person transactions (actual or proposed) since the beginning of HP’s last completed fiscal year.

Proxy Statement41


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL NO. 2
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board proposal no. 2
Ratification of independent registered public accounting firm
icon-check_blue2.jpg
Our Board recommends a voteFOR for the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20202023 fiscal year.

The Audit Committee has appointed and as a matter of good corporate governance, is requesting ratification by the stockholders of the committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2020.2023. During fiscal 2019,2022, Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm and provided certain other audit-related and tax services. See “Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors” and “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” below. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to participate in the annual meeting, where they will be available to respond to appropriate questions and, if they desire, to make a statement.

Vote Required

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20202023 fiscal year requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of HP common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to be voted at the annual meeting. If the appointment is not ratified, the Board will consider whether it should select another independent registered public accounting firm. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as HP’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of HP and its investors.

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for general oversight of the integrity of HP’s financial statements, HP’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, the performance of HP’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm, and risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee manages HP’s relationship with its independent registered public accounting firm (which reports directly to the Audit Committee) and is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with HP’s retention of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting or other advisors as the Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties and receives appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, from HP for such advice and assistance.

HP’s management is primarily responsible for HP’s internal control and financial reporting process. HP’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of HP’s consolidated financial statements and issuing opinions on the conformity of those audited financial statements with United States generally accepted accounting principles and the effectiveness of HP’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee monitors HP’s financial reporting process and reports to the Board on its findings.

44
logo_hp.jpg 

Audit Matters
In this context, the Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:

1.The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with HP’s management.
2.The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

42www.hpannualmeeting.com


1.The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with HP’s management.

Table2.The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of Contentsthe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC.

3.The Audit Matters

3.The Audit Committee has received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence.
4.Based on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs (1) through (3) above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in HP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019, for filing with the SEC.

Committee has received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence.

4.Based on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs (1) through (3) above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in HP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, for filing with the SEC.
The undersigned members of the Audit Committee have submitted this Report to the Board of Directors.

AUDIT COMMITTEE
Mary Anne Citrino, Chair
Robert R. Bennett
Stacy Brown-Philpot
Richard L. Clemmer
Jami Miscik
Kim K. W. Rucker
Subra Suresh
Yoky Matsuoka

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Fees incurred by HP for Ernst & Young LLP

The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by HP for audit and other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal 20192022 and 2018.2021. All fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval policy, as discussed below.

     2019     2018
In Millions
Audit Fees(1)$15.9$15.9
Audit-Related Fees(2)$2.4$3.3
Tax Fees(3)$2.9$4
All Other Fees(4)$$0.2
Total$21.2$23.4
(1)Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings.
(2)Audit-related fees for fiscal 2019 consisted primarily of accounting consultations, employee benefit plan audits and other attestation services. Audit-related fees for fiscal 2018 consisted primarily of accounting consultations, employee benefit plan audits, and other attestation services.
(3)Tax fees consisted primarily of tax advice and tax planning fees of $650,000 and $1.6 million for fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018, respectively. For fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018, tax fees also included tax compliance fees of $2.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively.
(4)For fiscal 2018, all other fees included primarily advisory service fees.

20222021
In Millions
Audit Fees(1)
$16.9 $16.7 
Audit-Related Fees(2)
$4.6 $2.9 
Tax Fees(3)
$3.8 $0.7 
All Other Fees(4)
$0.4 $0.1 
Total$25.7 $20.3 
(1) Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings.
(2)Audit-related fees for fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021 consisted primarily of accounting consultations and employee benefit plan audits.
(3)For fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021, tax fees consisted primarily of tax advice and tax planning fees. For fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021, tax fees also included tax compliance fees.
(4)For fiscal 2022, all other fees consisted of ESG assurance services. For fiscal 2021, all other fees consisted primarily of other attestation services.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services Policy

The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and associated fees up to a maximum for any one service of $250,000, provided that the chair shall report any decisions to pre-approve services and fees to the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting.

Proxy Statement43


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL NO. 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
2023 PROXY STATEMENT45

Executive Compensation
Board proposal no. 3
Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation
icon-check_blue2.jpg
Our Board recommends a voteFOR for the approval of the compensation of our NEOs, includingas described in the Compensation Discussionfollowing compensation discussion and Analysis, theanalysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion followingaccompanying such compensation tables, and the other related disclosures in this proxy statement.

In accordance with SEC rules, ouryour Board recommends that stockholders are being asked to approve, on ana non-binding advisory or non-binding basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K — aS-K. A detailed description of our compensation program is available in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Our

Your Board and the HRC Committee believe that we haveit has created a compensation program that is tied to performance, aligns with stockholder interests and merits stockholder support. Accordingly, we are asking for stockholder approval of the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion following the compensation tables.

Although this vote is non-binding, theour Board and the HRC Committee value the views of our stockholders and will thoroughly review the voting results. If there are significant negative votes, we will take steps to understand those concerns that influenced the vote and consider them in making future decisions about executive compensation. We currently conduct annual advisory votes on executive compensation and expect to conduct the next advisory vote at our next annual meeting of stockholders in 2021.

2024, unless HP announces otherwise following the Board’s consideration of the advisory vote provided in Proposal 4 of this Proxy Statement regarding the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of HP common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to be voted on the proposal at the annual meeting is required for advisory approval of this proposal.

44www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Overview

Alignment with Stockholders and Compensation Best Practices

Pay-for-Performance46
logo_hp.jpg 

Corporate Governance
The majority of target total directcompensationfor executives isperformance-basedas well asequity-basedtoalign executives’ rewards with stockholder value.
Total direct compensation istargetedat or near themedianof peersto ensure that it is appropriate and competitive.
Actual realizedtotal direct compensation andpay positioningare designed to fluctuate with, and becommensurate with, actual annual and long-term performance, recognizing company-wide, business, and individual results.
Incentive awardsare heavily dependent upon our stock performance and are measured againstobjective financial metricsthat we believelinkeither directly or indirectlyto the creation of valuefor our stockholders. In addition, 25% of our target annual incentives are contingent upon the achievement of qualitative objectives that we believe will contribute to our long-term success.
Webalancegrowth, cash flow, revenue and profit objectives, as well as short- and long-term objectives toreward for overall performancethat does not over-emphasize a singular focus on a particular metric or time period.
A significant portion of our long-term incentives are primarily delivered in the form of performance-adjusted restricted stock units, referred to as“PARSUs,”which vest only upon the achievement ofrelative total shareholder return (“TSR”)andEPSobjectives.
We validate thepay-for-performancerelationship on an annual basis and our Human Resources and Compensation (“HRC”) Committee reviews and approves performance goals under our incentive plans.
The compensation of objectively identifiedpeer companies based on industry and size criteriais considered to confirm that pay levels for the NEOs areappropriateandcompetitive.
The maximum payouts under annual incentive awards and underPARSUsarecapped at 200% of bonus target and 2x shares.
We do not utilize executive employment contracts for senior officers.
Wedevote significant timeto management succession planning and leadership development efforts.
We maintain aconsistent market-alignedseverance policy for executives and a conservative change in control policy which requires a double trigger for execution.
The HRC Committee engages anindependentcompensation consultant.
We haveclawback and equity-forfeiture provisionsthat provide the Board with discretion to recoup compensation in the event of a material financial restatement or misconduct that results in material reputational harm to the Company, which mitigates compensation-related risk.
We maintain strongstock ownership guidelinesfor executive officers and non-employee Directors.
Weprohibitall employees, including our executive officers, and also non-employee Directors, from engaging in any form ofhedgingtransaction involving HP securities, holding HP securities in margin accounts andpledgingstock as collateral for loans in a manner that could create compensation-related risk for the Company.
We conduct a robuststockholder outreachprogram throughout the year and use that input to inform our program decisions and pay practices.
Wediscloseour corporate performance goals and achievements relative to these goals.
We do not provideexcessive perquisitesto our employees, including our executive officers.
We do not allow our executives toparticipate in the determination of their own compensation.

Proxy Statement45


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Components of Compensation

Our executive compensation program primarily comprises performance-based components. The table below shows each pay component, the role and factors for determining the amount. Percentages are the averages of pay components at target for the NEOs, including the CEO.

Pay ComponentRoleDetermination Factors

Base Salary


Provides a fixed portion of annual cash income
Value of role in competitive marketplace
Value of role to the Company
Skills, experience and performance of individual compared to the market as well as others in the Company

Annual Incentive


(i.e., Pay-for-Results (“PfR”))
Payments to executives for annual PfR incentive purposes are made under the Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)

Provides a variable and performance-based portion of annual cash income
Focuses executives on annual objectives that support the long-term strategy and creation of value
Target awards based on competitive marketplace, level of position, skills and performance of executive
Actual awards based on achievement against annual corporate, business unit, and individual goals as set and approved by the HRC Committee

Long-term Incentives

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)
Performance-Adjusted Restricted Stock Units (“PARSUs”)
Supports need for long-term sustained performance
Aligns interests of executives and stockholders, reflecting the time-horizon and risk to investors
Focuses executives on critical long-term performance goals
Encourages equity ownership and stockholder alignment
Retains key employees
Target awards based on competitive marketplace, level of position, skills and performance of the executive
Actual earned values based on performance against corporate goals and TSR performance

All others:

Benefits
Limited perquisites
Severance protection
Supports the health and security of our executives and their ability to save on a tax-deferred basis
Enhances executive productivity
Competitive market practices for similar roles
Level of executive
Standards of best-in-class governance

Financial Highlights

As illustrated below for the three key financial measures used to fund our annual pay-for-performance incentive awards, we exceeded two of our three goals reflected in our business plan in fiscal 2019, even as the global-macroeconomic and foreign-currency environment was challenging.

GAAP Net RevenueAdjusted Non-GAAP Net EarningsNon-GAAP Free Cash Flow

$58.8
     BILLION

$3.8
     BILLION

6.78%

(as defined on page 52) compared to a target goal of $60.0 billion under our annual incentive plan.

(as defined on page 52) compared to a target goal of $3.7 billion under our annual incentive plan.

(as a percentage of revenue; as defined on page 52) compared to a target goal of 6.33% under our annual incentive plan.


46www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation philosophy and program, the compensation decisions the HRC Committee has made under the program, and the considerations in making those decisions in fiscal 2019.

2022.

Named Executive Officers

(NEOs)

Our NEOs for fiscal 20192022 are:

Dion J. Weisler, former President and CEO;

pg47-pic_lorese.jpg

Steven J. Fieler, Chief Financial Officer;

photo-myers_gray.jpg
image_2.jpg
photo-choa_gray.jpg
photo_trant.jpg

Enrique J. Lores
President and CEO and former

Marie Myers
Chief Financial
Officer
Julie Jacobs
Chief Legal Officer &
General Counsel
Alex Cho
President,
Personal Systems
Tuan Tran
President,
Imaging Printing and Solutions;

Kim M. Rivera, President, Strategy and Business Management and Chief Legal Officer; and

Alex Cho, President, Personal Systems.

&
Solutions

Following the end of fiscal 2019, Mr. Weisler

Christoph Schell, who stepped down as our PresidentChief Commercial Officer, effective February 18, 2022, and CEO on November 1, 2019, and Mr. Lores was appointed to the role. Upon stepping down from such positions, Mr. Weisler continues to be employed byleft the Company on March 11, 2022, is also an NEO for fiscal 2022.
Fiscal 2022 Compensation Highlights
For fiscal 2021, the HRC Committee revised our executive compensation plans to better align with our strategic growth agenda, making important changes to our long-term incentive plans, including:
Updating our Performance Adjusted Restricted Stock Units (“PARSUs”) to focus on exceptional earnings per share (“EPS”) growth by adding a 300% upside opportunity for stretch performance; and
Creating a new Performance-Contingent Stock Option (“PCSO”) plan with vesting contingent on achieving significant stock price hurdles.
For fiscal 2022, these plans were left largely intact, with some minor modifications to our annual incentive plan metrics and the relative weighting of the long-term incentives components as Senior Executive Advisor, a non-executive officer role, through our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. Weisler will alsosummarized below.
We continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors until the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Executive Summary

The HRC Committee continues to review and refine our compensation programs to support our evolving business strategy and attract high caliber executive talent. The HRC Committee’s assessment includes regular stockholder engagement and consideration of stockholder feedback. HP’s fiscal 2019 executive compensation structure remained the same as its fiscal 2018 program.

Below are brief highlights of key compensation decisions with respect to NEOs:

We providedprovide competitive target paycompensation opportunities, wherewith the amounts and mix wereof pay consistent with peers and generally stable year over year.

Target total direct compensationTotal Direct Compensation (“TDC”) was set within a competitive range of the market with variation based on each executive’s experience, individual performance, advancement potential and consideration of internal equity. TDC consists of base salary, percent-of-salary target annual incentives expressed as a percentage of base salary and earned based on attainment of our annual performance objectives, and the grant-date value of long-term incentives.
We modified our short-term incentive plan to align with value drivers of our long-term strategic and financial plans.
For fiscal 2022, we replaced the “Free Cash Flow Margin” metric under the annual incentive plan with “Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow,” one of the key critical value drivers of the long-term commitment that would bewe have made to stockholders and more closely aligned with peer group practices.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT47

Executive Compensation
We also increased the plan’s weightings on enterprise revenue and operating profit (from 17.5% to 25% each) while eliminating the weightings on business unit revenue and operating profit for executive officers. This shift towards a heavier weighting on enterprise metrics further strengthens alignment across our various business units.
For fiscal 2022, NEOs earned for achieving 100%annual incentives averaging 56.8% of goals, and long-term incentive grant-date value. NEO base salaries were unchanged for fiscal 2019, except a 7.4% promotional increase for Ms. Rivera upon being appointed President, Strategy and Business Management in additiontarget. Individual bonuses varied from 55.3% to her ongoing role as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, plus a 3.6% market adjustment for Mr. Weisler,57.8% of target with HP’s President and CEO. Target annual incentives were unchanged at 200%& CEO’s bonus equal to 57.8% of salary for Mr. Weisler and 125% of salary for each of the other NEOs. Regular long-term incentive grant values increased moderately consistenttarget. The Company achieved below target results with the market.

We aligned real pay delivery with performance through rigorous goal setting and performance measurement.

While our target TDC opportunities reflect market practice, our real pay delivery reflects performance. Annual incentives reward short-term performance measured against applicable enterprise-wide, business unit, and individual goals. Goals were set for the overall Company and businesses against internal budgets forrespect to adjusted non-GAAP operating profit, GAAP net revenues, adjusted non-GAAP net earnings/profit,revenue and non-GAAP free cash flow as aflow. Twenty-five percent of revenue. Non-financial individual performance goals undertarget annual incentives are contingent upon the achievement of qualitative objectives that we believe will contribute to HP’s long-term success including Innovation/Growth, Digital Transformation, People and Sustainable Impact. NEOs successfully delivered against their Management by Objectives (“MBO”MBOs”) program were set for each NEO. Meanwhile, regular annualas detailed on pages 55-56.

Our long-term incentive grants were approximatelyplan continued to align actual pay with performance by putting a significant portion of variable compensation at risk to support our more growth-oriented strategy.
For fiscal 2022, we increased the performance-based equity weighting for HP’s President & CEO from 60% to 70%, with 35% allocated to PARSUs and 35% allocated to PCSOs. Performance-based equity weightings for the rest of the NEOs remained at 60%, with 30% weighting each for PARSUs and PCSOs.
The remaining 30% to 40% of long-term incentive grant value was delivered in PARSUs that reward strategic performance measured by relative TSR comparedthe form of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) primarily intended to the S&P 500increase stock ownership among our NEOs, while also supporting retention and EPS measured in two and three year overlapping segments as explained on pages 55-56; the remaining 40%incentivizing NEOs to maximize value for our stockholders. The value of RSUs is in RSUs that are primarily for ownership and retention with the delivered value tied to stock price and reinvested dividend equivalents.

NEOs earned annual incentives averaging 117.2% of target for

In fiscal 2019.Individual bonuses varied from 93.2% to 150.7% of target and HP’s President & CEO was at 111.5%. The Company achieved above-target results with respect to HP adjusted non-GAAP net earnings/profit and non-GAAP free cash flow margin. GAAP net revenue results were below target. Further, NEOs successfully delivered against their MBOs as detailed on pages 53-54.

Proxy Statement47


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

2022, NEOs received payout for Segment 1 FY18 and Segment 2 FY17fiscal 2020 PARSUs (measurement periodsperiod ending in fiscal 2019)2022) of 126.4%. The PARSU EPS FY18 and EPS FY19 werepayout was above target. Fiscal 2017-2019 relativetarget at 101.4%, while the fiscal 2020-2022 TSR modifier approximated the 35th76th percentile of the S&P 500. Fiscal 2018-2019 relative TSR approximated the 15thpercentile of the S&P 500.

500, resulting in an additional +25% payout.

We regularly engaged with and listened to stockholders, practicedcontinued our strong compensation governance and mitigated potential compensation-related risks.

Ourpractices.

We periodically review our executive compensation program is continuously reviewed for peer group alignment and strategic relevance as part of a long-standing compensation governance process that includes ongoing stockholder engagement. At the annual meeting in 2019,2022, our say-on-pay proposal was approved by over 93%91% of the voted shares, indicating strongsignificant stockholder support. Consequently,support and reinforcing our direction to make only limited changes to the program.
48
logo_hp.jpg 

Executive Compensation
Components of Compensation*
Our executive compensation program consists primarily of performance-based components. The table below shows each major pay component, the role and factors for determining the amount. Percentages are the averages of pay components at target for the NEOs, including the CEO.
Pay ComponentRoleDetermination Factors
Base Salary
piechart_componentcomp.jpg
Provides a fixed portion of annual cash income
Value of role in competitive marketplace
Value of role to the Company
Skills, experience and performance of individual compared to the market as well as others in the Company
Annual Incentive
piechart_componentcomp1.jpg
Payments to executives for annual incentive purposes are made under the Stock Incentive Plan
Provides a variable and performance-based portion of annual cash income
Focuses executives on annual objectives that support the long-term strategy and creation of value
Target awards based on competitive marketplace, level of position, skills and performance of executive
75% of actual awards based on achievement against annual corporate and business unit financial metrics and individual goals as set and approved by the HRC Committee. Financial metrics are:
GAAP net revenue
Adjusted non-GAAP operating profit
Non-GAAP free cash flow
25% of actual awards based on achievement against individualized MBOs relating to Innovation/ Growth, Digital Transformation, People and Sustainable Impact
Long-term Incentive
PARSUs
PCSOs
RSUs
piechart_componentcompensa.jpg
Supports long-term sustained performance and growth-oriented strategy
Aligns interests of executives and stockholders, reflecting the time-horizon and risk to investors
Focuses executives on critical long-term performance goals
Encourages equity ownership and stockholder alignment
Retains key employees
Target awards based on competitive marketplace, level of position, skills and performance of the executive
Actual earned values based on performance against corporate EPS goals, relative TSR performance and stock price performance
All Others
Benefits
Limited perquisites
Severance protection
Supports the health and security of our executives and their ability to save on a tax-deferred basis
Enhances executive productivity
Competitive market practices for similar roles
Level of executive
Standards of best-in-class compensation governance
2022 NEO TDC (based on target) at a glance
CEOOther NEOs*
piechart_ceotdc.jpg
piechart_otherneotdc.jpg
*      Breakdown does not include compensation paid or payable with respect to fiscal year 2022 to Julie Jacobs, who was hired on October 3, 2022.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT49

Executive Compensation
Alignment with Stockholders and Compensation Best Practices
icon_checkbb.jpg
Pay-for-Performance
icon_checkbb.jpg
Compensation Governance
icon_checksb.jpg  The majority of target total direct compensation for executives is performance-based as well as equity-based to align executives’ rewards with sustained stockholder value creation.
icon_checksb.jpg  Total direct compensation is set within a competitive range of our peer group to ensure that it is appropriate and is aligned with the level of position, experience, skills and performance of the executive.
icon_checksb.jpg  Actual realized total direct compensation and pay positioning are designed to fluctuate with, and be commensurate with, actual annual and long-term performance, recognizing company-wide and individual results.
icon_checksb.jpg  Incentive awards are heavily dependent upon our stock performance and are measured against objective financial metrics that we believe link either directly or indirectly to the creation of value for our stockholders. In addition, 25% of our target annual incentives are contingent upon the achievement of qualitative objectives that we believe will contribute to our long-term success including Innovation/Growth, Digital Transformation, People and Sustainable Impact.
icon_checksb.jpg  We balance cash flow, revenue and profit objectives, as well as short- and long-term objectives to reward for overall performance that does not over-emphasize a singular focus on a particular metric or time period. Also, we have payout governors on key financial metric outcomes designed to avoid significantly overachieving on one metric, without taking into consideration our performance on other plan metrics (as explained in more detail starting on page 53).
icon_checksb.jpg  A significant portion of our long-term incentives are delivered in the form of performance-contingent stock options, referred to as “PCSOs”, which vest only if sustained stock price appreciation is achieved, and performance-adjusted restricted stock units, referred to as “PARSUs”, which vest upon the achievement of EPS objectives and which can be modified by relative total shareholder return (“TSR”).
icon_checksb.jpg  For fiscal 2022, the payouts under annual incentive awards and under PARSUs are capped at 200% of bonus target and 3x target shares, respectively.
icon_checksb.jpg  We validate the pay-for-performance relationship on an annual basis and our HRC Committee reviews and approves performance goals under our incentive plans.
icon_checksb.jpg  The compensation of objectively identified peer companies based on industry and size criteria is considered to confirm that pay levels and program design for the NEOs are appropriate and competitive.
icon_checksb.jpg  We conduct an ongoing, proactive stockholder outreach program throughout the year and use that input to inform our program decisions and pay practices.
icon_checksb.jpg  We disclose our corporate performance goals and achievements relative to these goals.
icon_checksb.jpg  We do not utilize fixed-term executive employment contracts for senior executives.
icon_checksb.jpg  We devote significant time to management succession planning and leadership development efforts.
icon_checksb.jpg  We maintain a consistent market-aligned severance policy for executives and a conservative change in control policy which requires a double trigger for execution.
icon_checksb.jpg  The HRC Committee engages an independent compensation consultant.
icon_checkb.jpg  We have clawback and equity-forfeiture provisions that enable the Board to recoup compensation in the event of a material financial restatement or misconduct that results in material reputational harm to the Company, which mitigates compensation-related risk.
icon_checkb.jpg  We maintain strong stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and non-employee Directors.
icon_checkb.jpg  We prohibit all employees, including our executive officers, and also non-employee Directors, from engaging in any form of hedging transaction involving HP securities, holding HP securities in margin accounts and pledging stock as collateral for loans in a manner that could create compensation-related risk for the Company.
icon_checkb.jpg  We do not provide excessive perquisites to our executive officers.
icon_checkb.jpg  We do not allow our executives to participate in the determination of their own compensation.
icon_checkb.jpg  We do not provide tax gross up payments, including 280G gross ups in the event of a change in control.
icon_checkb.jpg  We do not reprice underwater stock options without prior stockholder approval.
50
logo_hp.jpg 

Executive Compensation
Recent Changes Further Aligning Compensation with Stockholders’ Interests
We regularly engage with our stockholders on a variety of issues, including their views on best practices in executive compensation. We have not been extensive. Togiven due consideration to the issues that stockholders have identified as important to them for an executive compensation program. The following recent changes to our executive compensation program reflect our commitment to a compensation program that aligns pay to performance and drives stockholder value.
Starting with new grants in fiscal 2020, to ensure alignment with our three-year financial plan, we have movedchanged our long-term performance-based incentives (PARSUs)performance-adjusted restricted stock units (“PARSUs”) to incorporate a single three-year average EPS performance period with full vesting only after three years of service and achievement of financial goals for that timeframe. We are also changingchanged relative TSR from a standalone measure to a “modifier” on earnouts“payout modifier” determined based on thecumulative three-year performance period.performance. We feeldetermined that this will increasechange increased focus on line-of-sight strategic performance while continuing close alignment between stockholder value creation and real pay delivery.

We transitioned toBeginning in fiscal 2021, we incorporated performance-contingent stock options (“PCSOs”) into our long-term incentive compensation. PCSOs further align the interests of our executives with our stockholders since a new HP President & CEO atstock option will only realize value if the start of fiscal 2020, successfully executing the Board’s succession-planning process.

After a robust, in-depth succession planning assessment, Mr. Lores was appointed as President and CEO effective November 1, 2019. Mr. Lores’s initial target TDC was set moderately below the peer group medianunderlying share price appreciates and the HRC Committee’s intentPCSOs do not vest until specific stock-price growth hurdles have been achieved. PCSOs also provide further substantial “skin in the game” incentives for our senior executives toward long-term sustained stock growth that aligns with the transformational growth strategy we have committed to our stockholders.

For fiscal 2022, we increased the weight of performance-based compensation for our CEO to 70% (vs. 60% in fiscal 2021) to continue strong alignment between actual pay and performance and to support our more growth-oriented strategy. Performance-based compensation is split between 35% PCSOs and 35% PARSUs.
For fiscal 2023, each individual metric under our annual incentive plan may fund up to move him200% of target (versus a maximum of 250% of target in prior years). This change will ensure no single metric’s influence on payouts is larger than intended. Also, this funding cap better aligns with typical plan structures of peers. In addition, the stock price hurdle for the first tranche of the PCSOs will be 15% growth over a three-year period with a one-year time-based vesting requirement. This change increases the performance hurdle for the first tranche while also allowing more time for the market to observe and respond to the median or above median over the periodexecution of the next two-or-three years based on Company and individual performance. Mr. Lores did not receive a promotion grant or any special rewards in connection to his appointment as President and CEO.

HP’s strategy.

Executive Compensation Program Oversight and Authority

Role of the HRC Committee and its Advisor

The

At the end of fiscal 2021, the HRC Committee continuedconducted a selection process to retain FW Cookidentify an independent consultant that could help them best support HP’s transformational growth. HRC selected Semler Brossy as its independent consultant during fiscal 2019,2022, and to work with them and management on all aspects of our pay program for senior executives. The HRC Committee makes recommendations regarding the CEO’s compensation to the independent members of the Board for approval, and reviews and approves the compensation of the remaining Section 16 officers, including our NEOs. Each HRC Committee member is an independent non-employee Director with significant experienceexpertise in executive compensation matters.

The HRC Committee continually considers feedback from stockholders and the potential executive compensation implications of evolving business and strategic objectives. Based on these considerations, the HRC determined that it would be appropriate to make some fine-tuning changes in the program structure for 2020 (described further on page 57) that we believe are in our stockholders’ interests. We believe that our current compensation structure and proposed changes incent and reward achievement of specific goals, reinforce year-over-year results and provide an attractive pay-for-performance opportunity that encourages retention and leadership engagement.

FW Cook

Semler Brossy provides analyses and recommendations that inform the HRC Committee’s decisions; identifies peer group companies for competitive market comparisons; evaluates market pay data and competitive-position benchmarking; provides analyses and inputs on program structure, performance measures, and goals; provides updates on market trends and the regulatory environment as it relates to executive compensation; reviews various management proposals presented to the HRC Committee related to executive and Director compensation; and works with the HRC Committee to validate and strengthen the pay-for-performance relationship and alignment with stockholder interests. FW CookSemler Brossy does not perform other services for HP and will not do so without the prior consent of the HRC Committee chair. FW CookSemler Brossy meets with the HRC Committee chair and the HRC Committee outside the presence of management while in executive session.

The HRC Committee met sixeight times in fiscal 2019,2022, and all sixseven of these meetings included an executive session. FW CookSemler Brossy participated in fiveall of the meetings and, when requested by the HRC Committee chair, in the preparatory meetings and the executive sessions.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT51

Executive Compensation
Role of Management and the CEO in Setting Executive Compensation

The CEO recommends compensation for non-CEO Section 16 officers including NEOs other than himself, for approval by the HRC Committee. The BoardHRC considered market competitiveness, business results, experience, and individual performance when evaluating fiscal 20192022 NEO compensation and the overall compensation structure. The Chief Human ResourcesPeople Officer and other members of our executive compensation team, together with members of our finance and legal organizations, work with the CEO to design and develop the compensation program, to recommend changes to existing program provisions applicable to NEOs and other senior executives, as well asdevelop financial and other targets to be achieved under those programs, prepare analyses of financial data, peer comparisons and other briefing materials to assist the HRC Committee in making its decisions, and implement the decisions of the HRC Committee.

48www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

During fiscal 2019, management continued to engage Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) as its compensation consultant. The HRC Committee took into consideration that Meridian provided executive compensation-related services to management when it evaluated any information and analyses provided by Meridian, all of which were also independently reviewed by FW Cook, as applicable, on the HRC Committee’s behalf.

During fiscal 2019,2022, Mr. WeislerLores provided input to the HRC Committee regarding performance metrics and the setting of appropriate performance targets for his direct reports. Mr. WeislerLores also recommended MBOs for the NEOs (other than himself) and the other senior executives who report directly to him. Mr. WeislerLores is subject to the same financial performance goals as the executives who lead global functions and the businesses, and Mr. Weisler’sLores’ MBOs and compensation are established by the HRC Committee and recommended to the independent members of the Board for approval.

Use of Comparative Compensation Data and Compensation Philosophy

The HRC Committee reviews the compensation of our Section 16 officers in comparison to that of executives in similar positions at our peer group companies. Our peer group includes companies we compete with for executive talent due to our geographical proximity and technology industry overlap. The HRC Committee takes size differentiations into consideration when reviewing the results of market data analysis. The HRC Committee uses this information to evaluate how our pay levels and practices compare to market practices.

When determining the peer group, the following characteristics were considered:

Direct talent market peers.

US-based companies in the technology sector (excluding distributors, contract manufacturers and outsourced services/IT consulting) with revenues between ~$10 billion and $250 billion and market cap between ~$7 billion and $175 billion.

Select general industry companies (industrials, consumer products and telecom) generally meeting size and business criteria that are top-brands.

Review of the peer companies chosen by companies within our proposed peer group and peer business similarity, to evaluate relevance.

considered with exceptions made at the HRC Committee’s determination for labor-market relevance:

Direct talent market peers.
US-based companies in the technology sector (excluding distributors, contract manufacturers and outsourced services/IT consulting) with revenues between ~$12 billion and $290 billion and market cap between ~$8 billion and $200 billion.
Select general industry companies (industrials, consumer products and telecom) generally meeting size and business criteria that are top-brands and considering continuity.
Review of the peer companies chosen by companies within our proposed peer group and peer business similarity, to evaluate relevance.
We believe the resulting peer group provides HP and the HRC Committee with a valid comparison and benchmark for the Company’s executive compensation program and governance practices. For fiscal 2019,2022, the HRC Committee added Apple (direct peer)removed Microsoft and Micron Technology (size-appropriate technology company).Xerox from the peer group due to market cap and revenue differences between the two companies and HP. The HRC Committee also removed Amazon, Procter & Gamble and Verizon as all exceeded size range and were not direct peers.added Broadcom since the company has the characteristics described when determining the peer group. The HP peer group for fiscal 2019,2022, as approved by the HRC Committee, consisted of the following companies:

Fiscal 2019 Peer Group


*Represents fiscal 2019 reported revenue, except fiscal 2018 reported revenue is provided for
Fiscal 2022 Group
barchart-2022peergroup_rev.jpg 
Company
Dell Technologies Inc.
PepsiCo, Inc.
Intel Corporation
General Electric Company
HP Inc.
IBM Corporation
Cisco Systems, Inc.
NIKE, Inc.
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Oracle Corporation
Honeywell IBM, Intel, PepsiCo, International Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Micron Technology, Inc.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Western Digital Corporation
Texas Instruments and Xerox.Incorporated
Seagate Technology Holdings plc

*      Represents fiscal 2022 reported revenue, except fiscal 2021 reported revenue is provided for General Electric, Honeywell, IBM, Intel, PepsiCo and Texas Instruments.
Proxy Statement49
52
logo_hp.jpg 


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation
Process for Setting and Awarding Executive Compensation

A broad range of facts and circumstances are considered in setting our overall executive compensation levels. In fiscal 2019, the HRC Committee continued to set target compensation levels within a competitive range of the market median, although in some cases lower or higher based on each executive’s situation (e.g., attraction and retention of critical talent).

The Board maintains a total CEO target compensation package that approximates the median of our competitive market and is consistent with our pay positioning strategy and pay-for-performance philosophy.

The primary factors considered when determining pay opportunities for our NEOs are market competitiveness, experience, individual performance, advancement potential and internal equity, and individual performance.equitability. The weight given to each factor is not formulaic and may differ from year to year or by individual NEO. For example, when we recruit externally, market competitiveness, experience, and the candidate-specific circumstances may weigh more heavily in the compensation decision process. In contrast, when determining year-over-year compensation changes for current NEOs, internal equity and individual performance may factor more heavily in the decision.

The HRC Committee spends significant time determining the appropriate goals for our annual and long-term incentive plans, which make up the majority of NEO compensation. Management makes an initial recommendation of the goals, which is then assessed by the HRC Committee’s independent compensation consultant and discussed and approved by the HRC Committee. Major factors considered in setting financial goals for each fiscal year are business results from the most recently completed fiscal year, budgets and strategic plans, macroeconomic factors, guidance and analyst expectations, industry performance conditions or goals specific to a particular business segment, and strategic initiatives. MBOs are set basedaddress a range of important topics, including focus areas on major sharedInnovation/Growth, Digital Transformation, People and individual strategic, operating, and tactical initiatives.

Sustainable Impact.

Following the close of the fiscal year, the HRC Committee reviews actual financial results and MBO performance against the goals that it had set for the applicable plans for that year, with payouts under the plans determined based on performance against the established goals. The HRC Committee meets in executive session to review the MBO performance of the CEO and to determine a recommendation for his annual PfR incentive award to be approved by the independent members of the Board. See “2019“2022 Annual Incentives” below for a further description of our results and corresponding incentive payouts.

Listening to our Stockholders on Compensation

We regularly engage with our stockholders on a variety of issues, including their views on best practices in executive compensation. The following changes to our executive compensation program, shown here, reflect those conversations with stockholders.

Starting with new grants in fiscal 2020, to ensure alignment with our three-year financial plan, we have moved our long-term performance-based incentives (PARSUs) to a single three-year performance period with full vesting only after three years of service and achievement of financial goals for that timeframe. We are also changing relative TSR from a standalone measure to a “modifier” on earnouts determined based on the three-year performance period. We feel that this will increase focus on line-of-sight strategic performance while continuing close alignment between stockholder value creation and real pay delivery.

Some changes during the last few years that reflect conversations with stockholders include the following:

Increased focus on enterprise-wide GAAP net revenue and adjusted non-GAAP net earnings/profit in our annual PfR incentive plan to encourage greater collaboration and teamwork among business leaders.

Replaced Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) with EPS in our PARSU grants for stronger alignment with stockholder interests and because it is a more appropriate measure for HP after the separation of HPE.

At the 2019 annual meeting, our annual say-on-pay proposal received the support of over 93% of the votes cast. As part of its 2019 executive compensation discussions, the HRC Committee reviewed the advisory vote result and considered it to be supportive of the Company’s compensation practices.

Determination of Fiscal 20192022 Executive Compensation

Under our Total Rewards Program, executive compensation consists of:of base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives, benefits, and perquisites.

The HRC Committee regularly exploresconsiders ways to improve our executive compensation program by considering stockholder feedback, our current business needs and strategy, and peer group practices. For 2019 the Committee decided to maintain a consistent compensation structure for executives since it supports our business strategy and aligns pay with stockholder interests.

50www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

20192022 Base Salary

Our executives receive a small percentage of their overall compensation in the form of base salary, which is consistent with our philosophy of tying the majority of executive pay to performance. The NEOs are paid an amount in the form of base salary sufficient to attract qualified executive talent and maintain a stable management team.

The HRC Committee aims to set executive base salaries at or nearwithin a competitive range of the market median for comparable positions. In fiscal 2019,2022, salaries generally comprise on average 11%9% of our NEOs’ overall compensation, consistent with our peers. To decideIn making its recommendation to the Board regarding the CEO’s salary, the HRC Committee reviews analyses and recommendations provided by FW Cook.

Semler Brossy.

For fiscal 2019, Mr. Weisler’s salary was increased from $1.4 million to $ 1.45 million to recognize his contributions and better align with the market median. For fiscal 2019,2022, the HRC Committee did notapproved changes to the base salaries of Ms. Myers, Mr. Cho, Mr. Tran and Mr. Schell, and recommended that the Board approve a change in the base salary for Mr. Fieler,of Mr. Lores, or Mr. Cho. During fiscal 2018, Mr. Fieler’s base salary had been increased to $690,000 during July 2018in each case, as described in the table below. Ms. Myers’ and Mr. Cho’s baseTran’s salary had been increasedincreases were to $675,000 during June 2018reflect better alignment to market, peers and performance.
Changes in conjunction with their promotions to CFO and President, Personal Systems, respectively.Base Salary
ExecutiveFiscal Year-end
2021 Base
Salary
Fiscal Year-end
2022 Base
Salary
Percentage
Change
Enrique Lores$1,200,000 $1,250,000 %
Marie Myers$700,000 $780,000 11 %
Julie Jacobs*N/A$700,000 N/A
Alex Cho$740,000 $780,000 %
Tuan Tran$715,000 $780,000 %
Christoph Schell**$760,000 $800,000 %
*    Ms. Rivera’s base salary was increased from $675,000 to $725,000 due to her new responsibilities as President, Strategy and Business Management while retaining her roleJacobs joined the Company on October 3, 2022 as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary.

Changes in Base Salary

Executive   Fiscal Year-end
2018 Base Salary
   Fiscal 2019
Base Salary
   Percentage
Change
Dion Weisler     $1,400,000 $1,450,000+3.6%
Steven Fieler$690,000$690,000+0.0%
Enrique Lores$750,000$750,000+0.0%
Kim Rivera$675,000$725,000+7.4%
Alex Cho$675,000$675,000+0.0%

2019& General Counsel.

**    Mr. Schell left the company on March 11, 2022.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT53

Executive Compensation
2022 Annual Incentives

The fiscal 20192022 annual PfR incentive plan for the Executive Leadership Team consisted of the following three core financial metrics: GAAP net revenue, adjusted non-GAAP net earnings/operating profit, and non-GAAP free cash flow. Revenue, operating profit and free cash flow as a percentageare critical value drivers of revenue. the long-term commitment that we have made to stockholders.
For fiscal 2022, non-GAAP free cash flow replaced the free cash flow margin metric. Free cash flow is one of the key critical value drivers of the long-term commitment that we have made to stockholders and is better aligned with peers’ practices. An additional change introduced was to increase the weighting of the enterprise revenue and operating profit metrics to 25% each (compared to 17.5% each under the annual incentive plan for fiscal 2021) while eliminating business unit revenue and operating profit metrics for NEOs for fiscal 2022. This shift towards increasing the weighting of each enterprise metric further strengthens alignment across our various business units.
A fourth metric,component, MBOs, was used to further drive individual performance and achievement of key strategic goals. Each financial metric wasand the MBOs were weighted at 25% of the target award value. Each individual metric may fund up to 250% of target; however, the maximum annual PfR incentive for each executive is capped at 200% of target.

We believe the annual incentive metrics were critical drivers of the recently completed three-year value creation plan announced in February 2020 (the “Value Plan”) that also ensure our Executive Leadership Team’s immediate goals and incentives are aligned with our long-term strategic and financial plans, as well as stockholder interests.
The target annual PfR incentive awards for fiscal 20192022 were set at 200% of salaryeligible earnings for the CEO and 125%135% of salary for the other NEOs.

ForCFO, President Personal Systems, President Imaging Printing and Solutions and Chief Commercial Officer. The target annual incentive award for the Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel was set at 100% of eligible earnings.

In addition, payment under the annual incentive plan is contingent on an NEO’s service through the end of the fiscal 2019, the HRC Committee again established an “umbrella” formula governingyear.
Fiscal 2022 Annual Incentive Plan
Corporate Goals
Key Design ElementsGAAP Net
Revenue
($ in billions)
Adjusted
Non-GAAP
Operating Profit
($ in billions)

Non-GAAP Free
Cash Flow
(1)
($ in billions)
MBOs
% Payout
Metric
(2)
(%)
Weight25 %25 %25 %25 %
LinkageCorporateCorporateCorporateIndividual
Corporate Performance Goals
Maximum— — — Various250
Target$67.4 $6.3 $4.5 Various100
Threshold— — — Various0
(1)Maximum funding for non-GAAP free cash flow is capped at 150% of target if adjusted non-GAAP operating profit achievement was below target and is capped at 100% of target if adjusted non-GAAP operating profit achievement was below threshold. If adjusted non-GAAP operating profit achievement was above target, the maximum bonusfunding level is 250% for this metric. Maximum and then exercised negative discretionthreshold information are not disclosed because such disclosure would result in setting actual bonuses. Undercompetitive harm. However, goals are set at levels we believe to be achievable in connection with strong performance.
(2)Interpolated for performance between discrete points. Each individual metric may fund up to 250% of target; however, the umbrella formula,maximum annual incentive for each Section 16 officer (including each NEO) was allocated a pro rata share of 0.75% of adjusted non-GAAP net earnings based on his or her target annual PfR incentive award, subject to a maximum bonus ofexecutive is capped at 200% of the NEO’s target bonus, and the maximum $15 million individual cap under the Stock Incentive Plan. Below this umbrella funding structure, actual payouts were determined based upon financial metrics and MBOs established and evaluated by the HRC Committee for Section 16 officers (including each NEO) and by the independent members of the Board for the CEO.

Proxy Statement51


target.

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Fiscal 2019 Annual Incentive Plan

Corporate Goals
Key Design ElementsGAAP Net
Revenue
($ in billions)
Adjusted
Non-GAAP Net
Earnings/Profit
($ in billions)
Non-GAAP Free
Cash Flow as a
% of Revenue
(1)
(%)
MBOs% Payout
Metric
(2)
(%)
Weight     25%   25%   25%   25%   
Linkage
Global Functions Executives(3)CorporateCorporateCorporateIndividual
Business Unit (“BU”) Executives(4)Corporate/BUCorporate/BUCorporateIndividual
Corporate Performance Goals
MaximumVarious250
Target$60.0$3.76.33%Various100
ThresholdVarious0
(1)

Maximum funding for non-GAAP free cash flow as a percentage of revenue is capped at 150% of target if adjusted non-GAAP net earnings/profit achievement was below target and is capped at 100% of target if adjusted non-GAAP net earnings/profit achievement was below threshold. If adjusted non-GAAP net earnings/profit achievement was above target, the maximum funding level is 250% for this metric. Maximum and threshold information are not disclosed because such disclosure would result in competitive harm. However, goals are set at levels we believe to be achievable in connection with strong performance.

(2)

Interpolated for performance between discrete points. Each individual metric may fund up to 250% of target; however, the maximum annual PfR incentive for each executive is capped at 200% of target. As a general administrative discretionary guideline, the HRC Committee may decide that financial funding for Global Functions Executives, including the CEO, cannot exceed the highest funding for a Business Unit Executive.

(3)

The Global Functions Executives include Mr. Weisler, Mr. Fieler and Ms. Rivera.

(4)

The Business Unit Executives includes Mr. Lores and Mr. Cho. Specific Business Unit GAAP net revenue and adjusted non-GAAP net earnings/profit goals are not disclosed because such disclosure would result in competitive harm. However, goals are set at levels we believe to be achievable in connection with strong performance.

The specific metrics, their linkage to corporate results, and the weighting that was placed on each were chosen because the HRC Committee believed that:

Performance against these metrics, in combination, enhances value for stockholders, capturing both the top and bottom line, as well as cash and capital efficiency.
A balanced weighting of metrics limits the likelihood of rewarding executives for excessive risk-taking.
Different measures avoid paying for the same performance twice.
MBOs address a range of important topics, including focus areas on Innovation/Growth, Digital Transformation, People and Sustainable Impact, which are important to the long-term success of the Company.
54A balanced weighting of metrics limits the likelihood of rewarding executives for excessive risk-taking.
logo_hp.jpg 

Different measures avoid paying for the same performance twice.Executive Compensation
MBOs enhance focus on business objectives, such as operational objectives, strategic initiatives, succession planning, and people development, which are important to the long-term success of the Company.

The following chart sets forth the definition of and rationale for each of the financial performance metrics that was used for the Fiscal 20192022 Annual Incentive Plan:

Financial
Performance Metrics
Definition(1)
DefinitionRationale for Metric
GAAP Net RevenueNet revenue as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 20192022Reflects top line financial performance, which is a strong indicator of our long-term ability to drive stockholder value
GAAP Business RevenueSegment net revenue as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2019
Adjusted Non-GAAP Net Earnings(1)
Operating Profit
(2)Non-GAAP net earnings,operating profit, as defined and reported in our fourth quarter fiscal 20192022 earnings press release (of $5.5 billion in fiscal 2022) and summarized in footnote (1) below, excludingbonus net of income taxfurther adjusted by excluding bonusReflects bottom lineoperational financial performance, which is directly tied to stockholder value on a short-term basisbasis. Provides stronger alignment with our long-term strategic and financial plans
Non-GAAP Business Net Profit (“BNP”)Business net profit, excluding bonus net of income tax
Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow(2)(3)
Cash flow from operations less theNet cash provided by operating activities adjusted for net of investments in leases and proceeds from sales ofnet investments in property, plant and equipment, as reported in our fourth quarter fiscal 20192022 earnings press release and summarized in footnote (2) below divided by net revenue as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2019 (expressed as a percentage of revenue)Reflects efficiency of cash management practices, including working capital and capital expenditures,

52www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

(1)

As summarized above, Adjusted non-GAAP net earnings is a non-GAAP measure enabling the company to pursue opportunities that is defined as GAAP net earnings (of $3.4 billion in fiscal 2019), which excludes (i) after-tax costs of $257 million relatedcontribute to restructuring and other charges, acquisition-related charges, amortization of intangible assets, non-operating retirement-related credits/(charges), and tax adjustments as well as (ii) bonus net of income tax. Management uses adjusted non-GAAP net earnings to evaluate and forecast our performance before gains, losses, or other charges that are considered by management to be outside of our core business segment operating results. We believe that presenting adjusted non-GAAP net earnings provides investors with greater visibility with respect to the information used by management in its financial and operational decision making. We further believe that providing this additional non-GAAP information helps investors understand our operating performance and evaluate the efficacy of the methodology and information used by management to evaluate and measure such performance. This additional non-GAAP information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP diluted net earnings.

(2)As summarized above, non-GAAP free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as cash flow from operations ($4.7 billion in fiscal 2019) less the net of investments in and proceeds from sales of property, plant, and equipment ($0.7 in fiscal 2019). HP’s management uses non-GAAP free cash flow for the purpose of determining the amount of cash available for investment in HP’s businesses, repurchasing stock and other purposes. HP’s management also uses non-GAAP free cash flow to evaluate HP’s historical and prospective liquidity.long-term shareholder value.

(1)For purposes of establishing financial performance results under the fiscal 2022 Annual Incentive Plan, our financial results, whether reported in accordance with GAAP or a non-GAAP measure, may be further adjusted as permitted by guidelines approved by the HRC at the time of establishing the fiscal 2022 financial goals.
(2)As summarized above, adjusted non-GAAP operating profit is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as GAAP operating profit (of $4.7 billion in fiscal 2022) adjusted to exclude (i) costs of $802 million related to restructuring and other charges, acquisition and divestiture charges, amortization of intangible assets and Russia exit charges and (ii) bonus. This additional non-GAAP information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP operating profit.
(3)As summarized above, non-GAAP free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as net cash provided by operating activities ($4.5 billion in fiscal 2022) adjusted to exclude the impact of net investments in leases ($155 million in fiscal 2022) and net investments in property, plant and equipment ($765 million in fiscal 2022).
Following fiscal 2019,2022, the HRC Committee reviewed performance against the financial metrics and certified the results as follows:

Fiscal 2019 Annual PfR Incentive Performance Against Financial Metrics(1,2)2022 annual incentive performance against financial metrics

MetricWeight(3)Target
($ in billions)
Result
($ in billions)
Percentage of Target
Annual Incentive Funded
GAAP Net Revenue     25.0%             $60.0             $58.8     19.8%
Adjusted Non-GAAP Net Earnings25.0%$3.7$3.825.8%
Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow (% of revenue)25.0%6.33%6.78%45.9%
Total75.0%91.5%
(1)
(1)

Mr. Weisler, Mr. Fieler and Ms. Rivera received annual PfR incentive payments based on corporate financial metrics.
Metric(1)
Weight(2)
Target
($ in billions)
Result(3)
($ in billions)
Percentage of Target
Annual Incentive Funded
GAAP Net Revenue25.0 %$67.4 $63.7 11.1%
Adjusted Non-GAAP Operating Profit25.0 %$6.3 $5.8 14.4%
Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow25.0 %$4.5 $4.0 4.8%
Total75.0 %30.3%

(1)Governors include that HP adjusted non-GAAP operating profit will need to be achieved at minimum to be eligible for any award related to the HP GAAP net revenue component. Also, non-GAAP free cash flow is capped at 150% of target if HP adjusted non-GAAP operating profit achievement is below target. Non-GAAP free cash flow is capped at 100% of target if HP adjusted non-GAAP operating profit is below minimum.
(2)The financial metrics were equally weighted to account for 75% of the target annual incentive.
(3)Following the completion of fiscal 2022, the HRC approved adjustments to financial results for the noted metrics to take into account business disruption due to the ongoing Russia/Ukraine conflict. Such adjustments were aligned to guidelines approved by the HRC at its January 2022 meeting, at the same time fiscal 2022 financial goals were approved. Results above reflect adjusted values. The adjustment made to adjusted non-GAAP operating profit was in addition to the adjustment for Russia exit charges noted in the table above.
Fiscal 2022 annual incentive performance against non-financial component (MBOs)
Mr. Lores. The HRC Committee determined that Mr. Lores’ MBO performance was achieved above target. Mr. Lores and Mr. Cho received an annual PfR incentive payment based on corporate and business financial metrics.

(2)

As a general administrative discretionary guideline, the HRC Committee may decide that financial funding for Global Functions Executives, including the CEO, cannot exceed the highest funding for a Business Unit Executive.

(3)

The financial metrics were equally weighted to account for 75% of the target annual PfR incentive.

Mr. Weisler.At the end of the fiscal year, the independent members of the Board evaluated Mr. Weisler’s performance against all of his MBOs, which included, but were not limited to: setting strategic direction for the Company based on optimizing stockholder value, maintaining supplies stabilization, growing profitable share in Personal Systems, engaging with all major constituents including financial analysts, media, key governmental figures, partners and customers to execute the HP strategy, and ensuring HP has a robust evaluation and talent program. After conducting a thorough review of Mr. Weisler’s performance, the independent members of the Board determined that his MBO performance reflected a number of accomplishments but overall had been achieved below target due to Print supplies performance. Mr. Weisler had strong accomplishments, including the following:

Maintained the three-pronged Core, Growth,
Accelerated growth businesses, which collectively generated over $11 billion in revenue in fiscal 2022, exceeding our goal
Invested in longer term growth through our acquisition of Poly and Future strategy, designed to drive employees across the world towards a common goal.
Expanded Personal Systems revenue in profitable categories and the attach category initiatives.
Accelerated 3D print business through development of industrial go-to-market, applications and focus on key verticals.
Developed and managed an effective plan to address key regulatory/political changes as well as to mitigate US trade/tariff impacts.
Executed a plan to consistently engage with channel partners, customers, and ecosystem partners to ensure he was getting direct feedback on the HP strategy and product portfolio to enable appropriate adjustments.
Continued to invest across all three waves (Core, Growth and Future) in each business.
Drove digital transformation and created a core competency in software, data analytics and machine learning.
Kept the organization updated and motivated, from the leadership team to the broader employee population, to ensure that all understood the strategy and priorities. Cultivated a growth mindset across the organization with extreme customer focus.
Reinvented go-to-market and customer engagement models to address dramatic shift in buying behaviors.
Continued implementation of modern ERP platform with development of standardized and simplified processes.
Worked closely with external advisors to develop future strategy and a roadmap to accelerate value creation for customers, partners and stockholders.
Worked with the Independent Chair to set the annual Board and Committee objectives, priorities and the Board/Committee meeting agendas.

As CEO, Mr. Weisler evaluated the performanceformation of eachour Workforce Services and Solutions offering

On the strength of our digital progress, launched Future Ready initiatives to drive productivity and create capacity for growth
Continued to make progress with the other Section 16 officers (including eachfull enterprise resource planning deployment by retiring multiple legacy systems
Designed enterprise digital architecture driving consolidation of the other NEOs)people, platforms and presented the results of those evaluationsassociated capabilities
Added high performing, diverse leaders to the HRC Committee at its November 2019 meeting. The evaluations included an analysisExecutive Leadership Team while also strengthening the broader executive bench
Continued to progress workforce diversity, improve inclusion, and strengthen employee engagement
Supported employees through new wellness initiatives
Exceeded FY22 goals for deforestation for non-HP branded paper and acceleration of the officers’ performance against all of their MBOs. The HRC Committee reviewed the CEO’s assessment of the degree of attainment of the MBOs of the other Section 16 officersdigital equity
Published 21st annual Sustainable Impact Report and set their MBO scores. The results of these evaluations for the other NEOs are summarized below.

Proxy Statement53


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Mr. Fieler.The HRC Committee determined that Mr. Fieler’s MBOs performance had been achieved below target due to Print supplies performance. Overall, Mr. Fieler demonstrated strategic, thoughtfulreceived multiple climate, supply chain and engaged leadership in running the Finance function. His strong operational perspective supported the Company through business changes. Mr. Fieler has strong relationships with the investor relations community and is critical to ensuring our results deliver against financial expectations.social rankings

Mr. Lores.The HRC Committee determined that Mr. Lores’s MBOs performance had been achieved below target due to Print supplies performance. Mr. Lores did continue reinventing the Print business with a focus on differentiated innovation, business model transformation and strategic M&A. Over the past year, Mr. Lores did a remarkable job working with the HP Board on a comprehensive global review of the Company strategy and business operations, with a focus on simplifying its operating model, evolving its business models and driving significant improvement in its cost structure while making the Company more digitally enabled and customer centric.

Ms. Rivera.Myers. The HRC Committee determined that Ms. Rivera’sMyers’ MBO performance had beenwas achieved above target. Ms. Rivera worked closelyMyers’ excellent leadership and commitment helped HP navigate the external environment in a difficult and volatile year while retaining credibility with our shareholders
2023 PROXY STATEMENT55

Executive Compensation
and the analyst community. Ms. Myers made substantial progress on key deliverables, including her work on improving employee experience, developing senior and emerging leaders within the Finance organization, and advancing priorities around digital equity, climate and human rights. Ms. Myers is a highly valued member of the Executive Leadership Team and an exemplary leader to our HP community.
Ms. Jacobs. The HRC Committee determined that Ms. Jacobs’ MBO performance was achieved at target. Despite having only recently joined HP in October 2022, Ms. Jacobs made an immediate positive impact by focusing on high priority items while working to connect and assess her leadership team. Ms. Jacobs is an excellent addition to the Executive Leadership Team with the businesses on critical matters such as supplies infringements, counterfeit seizuresright experience and IP protection. She did an excellent job on corporate governance, tariffs, investigations, launchingskillset to propel the “Transformation Management Office”team towards building functional capabilities and customer service transformation initiatives. Ms. Rivera is a well-respected leader with a strong understanding of commercial decisions and is a strong partner in business, technology and governance matters.delivering key goals.

Mr. Cho.Cho. The HRC Committee determined that Mr. Cho’s MBO performance had beenwas achieved aboveat target. Despite the various challengesThrough his leadership and thoughtful collaboration, Mr. Cho played a vital role in the marketplace,success of two of HP’s strategic priorities, the Poly acquisition and the creation of the new Workforce Services and Solutions business unit. Mr. Cho did an excellent jobalso made substantial progress on his people and sustainable impact goals, meeting or surpassing a number of his targets for the year and took a strong leadership role in delivering profits and steady revenue progress. He did a remarkable job in the introduction and roll out of new products such as Dragonfly in Asia.digital equity. Mr. Cho is a thoughtfulwell-respected and well respectedwell-regarded leader in the organization with a strongdedicated team tohelping drive the business appropriately.forward.

Mr. Tran. The HRC Committee determined that Mr. Tran’s MBO performance was achieved above target. Mr. Tran’s strong leadership enabled HP to address business headwinds in Print by focusing on alignment and key priorities across his leadership team and partnering effectively with the Commercial Organization and marketing. Despite incredibly challenging business conditions, Mr. Tran’s focus on execution delivered strong progress within the Print portfolio and consumer services. Mr. Tran also played a very strong leadership role on climate/deforestation (forest neutral printing). Mr. Tran is a knowledgeable and experienced leader with the credibility needed both internally and with external stakeholders to help drive HP’s enterprise goals.
Based on the findings of these performance evaluations, the HRC Committee (and, in the case of the CEO, the independent members of the Board) evaluateddetermined performance against the non-financialMBO metrics for the NEOs as follows:

Named Executive OfficerTarget
MBO
(%)
MBO
Funded
(%)
Enrique J. Lores25.027.5
Marie Myers25.027.5
Julie Jacobs25.025.0
Alex Cho25.025.0
Tuan Tran25.027.5
Christoph Schell*25.0N/A
*    Mr. Schell did not receive a fiscal 2022 annual incentive payout because he departed the company mid-year.
Fiscal 2019 Annual PfR Incentive Performance Against Non-Financial Metrics (MBOs)

Named Executive OfficerWeight
(%)
Percentage of Target
Annual Incentive
Funded
(%)
Dion J. Weisler     25.0     20.0
Steven J. Fieler25.020.0
Enrique J. Lores25.020.0
Kim M. Rivera25.027.5
Alex Cho25.037.5

Based on the level of performance described above on both the financial metrics and non-financial metricsMBOs for fiscal 2019,2022, the payouts to the NEOs under the annual PfR incentive were as follows:

Fiscal 20192022 Annual PfR Incentive Payout
Total payouts were determined by adding the weighted performance against financial metrics to the weighted performance against the non-financial metrics to determine a total payout as a percentage of the target opportunity for each executive:
Percentage of Target
Annual Incentive Funded
Total Annual
Incentive Payout
Named Executive Officer(1)
Financial
Metrics
(%)
Non-Financial
Metrics / MBOs
(%)
As % of Target
Annual Incentive
(%)
Payout
($)
Enrique J. Lores30.327.557.81,445,564
Marie Myers30.327.557.8608,871
Julie Jacobs30.325.055.332,271
Alex Cho30.325.055.3582,546
Tuan Tran30.327.557.8608,871
(1)

Percentage of Target
Annual Incentive Funded
Total Annual
Incentive Payout
Named Executive OfficerFinancial
Metrics
(%)
Non-Financial
Metrics
(%)
As % of Target
Annual Incentive
(%)
Payout
($)
Dion J. Weisler     91.5     20.0     111.5     3,233,533
Steven J. Fieler91.520.0111.5961,697
Enrique J. Lores73.220.093.2873,522
Kim M. Rivera91.527.5119.01,078,448
Alex Cho113.237.5150.71,271,882
Mr. Schell did not receive a fiscal 2022 annual incentive payout because he departed the company mid-year.

54www.hpannualmeeting.com
56
logo_hp.jpg 


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation
Long-term Incentive Compensation

The HRC Committee established – Awards from Fiscal 2022

In order to motivate and reward our NEOs for their contributions towards achieving our business objectives, long-term incentives comprise the majority of each NEO’s total target compensation opportunity with a total long-term incentive target value for each NEO established by the HRC Committee in early fiscal 2019 that was2022. The long-term incentives consist of a mix of 35% PARSUs, 35% PCSOs and 30% time-based RSUs for our CEO (performance-based equity for our CEO increased, year-over-year, from 60% weighted in the formto 70% of his overall long-term incentive target opportunity) and a mix of 30% PARSUs, 30% PCSOs and 40% weighted in the form of time-based RSUs.RSUs for our other NEOs, and are linked to EPS, relative TSR and stock price performance. The high proportion of performance-based awards (60%- 70%) reflects our pay-for-performance philosophy. The time-based awards support retention and are linked to stockholder value and ownership, which are important goals of our executive compensation program.

2019

2022 PARSUs

The fiscal 20192022 PARSUs havecliff-vest following the sameend of a three-year performance period in 2024. Vesting of the PARSUs is based on achievement of an adjusted non-GAAP EPS goal with a TSR “payout modifier.” The EPS goal consists of three annual goals that roll up into our three-year annual average EPS. A TSR “payout modifier” is then applied to the EPS average payout at the end of year three to ensure alignment with our stockholders’ experience and stockholder value creation. TSR is measured over the full three-year period based on performance against the S&P 500. The relative TSR is a market-based payout modifier that adjusts payout (-50%, 0% or +50%) so there is alignment with stockholder results. Final payout is subject to an overall maximum of 300% of the target number of shares. This structure as usedis summarized in the charts below:
PARSU Measures
Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS(1) – 100% of the units
Relative TSR vs. S&P 500 – “Payout Modifier”
PARSU Measurement Periods
Earnout and vesting at the end of 3 years, subject to continued service
EPS based on three 1-year goals, set at the beginning of each year(2)
TSR measured over the full 3-years from FY22-24
PARSU Goal Scoring
EPS funds payout from zero to 300% of target units according to threshold-target-maximum(3)
Max
Above target
Target
Threshold
Below Threshold
300%
200%
100%
50%
0%
TSR adds 50% if in the top quartile and subtracts 50% if in the bottom quartile (no adjustment from 25th percentile to 75th percentile).
Relative 3-year TSR > S&P 500 75th percentile
+50%
Relative 3-year TSR is equal to or between S&P 500 25th and 75th percentile
No change
Relative 3-year TSR < S&P 500 25th percentile
-50%
Subject to overall 300% of target shares max
(1)Adjusted non-GAAP EPS for PARSU measurement is calculated using non-GAAP net earnings (as defined and reported in our fourth quarter fiscal 20172022 earnings press release (of $4.3 billion in fiscal 2022)) further adjusted to include bonus at target (net of income tax). As summarized in the preceding sentence, adjusted non-GAAP net earnings is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as GAAP net earnings (of $3.2 billion in fiscal 2022) and fiscal 2018 PARSUs. Fiscal 2019 PARSUs have(i) excluding after-tax costs of $1.1 billion related to restructuring and other charges, acquisition and divestiture charges, amortization of intangible assets, Russia exit charges, non-operating retirement-related (credits)/charges and tax adjustments and (ii) further adjusted to include bonus at target (net of income tax). This non-GAAP information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a two-and three-year vesting period, subject to one-, two-, and three-year performance periods that begansubstitute for GAAP net earnings.
(2)Performance measurement occurs at the startend of the year one, year two, and year three performance periods.
(3)Interpolate for performance between discrete points.
In November of 2022, the HRC Committee determined that fiscal 20192022 EPS for fiscal 2022 PARSUs was achieved at 0% (for not having met the threshold) based on actual PARSU EPS performance of $4.01 (target of $4.38). The final payout will also depend on performance in fiscal 2023 and continue through2024 along with the three-year relative TSR performance.
Metric
PARSU EPS(1) – 100%
Results
Fiscal 2022
EPS Target: $4.38
Fiscal 2023 EPSFiscal 2024 EPS
Average EPS
Performance
3-year
TSR Payout Modifier
Total Payout
Fiscal 2022 PARSUs0%TBDTBDTBD
icon_arrowf1.jpg
(1)EPS for PARSU measurement is calculated on an adjusted non-GAAP basis. See footnote (1) of the immediately preceding table for additional information.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT57

Executive Compensation
2022 PCSOs
PCSOs support our more growth-oriented portfolio and strategy and align the interests of our executives with our stockholders by driving long-term sustained stock price growth and reflecting the time-horizon and risk to investors. The fiscal 2022 PCSO awards will vest in three tranches provided certain stock price requirements are met as follows:
one-third of the PCSO award will vest upon continued service of one year and achievement of a closing stock price that is at least 10% over the grant date stock price for at least 20 consecutive trading days within two years from the date of grant;
one-third will vest upon continued service for two years and achievement of a closing stock price that is at least 20% over the grant date stock price for at least 20 consecutive trading days within four years from the date of grant; and
one-third will vest upon continued service of three years and achievement of a closing stock price that is at least 30% over the grant date stock price for at least 20 consecutive trading days within five years from the date of grant.
As of the end of fiscal 2019, 2020 and 2021. Under this program, 50%2022, stock price appreciation conditions had not been met for any of the PARSUs (including dividend equivalent units) are eligible for vesting based on EPS and 50% are eligible for vesting based on relative TSR performance. These PARSUs vest as follows: 16.6% of the units are eligible for vesting based on EPS performance of year one with continued service over two years, 16.6% of the units are eligible for vesting based on EPS performance of year two with continued service over three years, 16.6% of the units are eligible for vesting based on EPS performance of year three with continued service over three years, 25% of the units are eligible for vesting based on relative TSR performance over two years with continued service over two years, and 25% of the units are eligible for vesting based on relative TSR performance over three years with continued service over three years. This structure is depicted in the chart below:

2019 PARSUs

Key Design ElementsEPS vs. Internal GoalsRelative TSR vs. S&P 500Payout
Weight     16.6%     16.6%     16.6%     25%     25%     
Performance Periods(1)Year 1Year 2Year 32 Years3 Years% of Target(3)
Vesting Periods(2)Year 2Year 3Year 3Year 2Year 3
Performance Levels:
Max> 90thpercentile200%
> TargetTarget to be disclosed after
the end of the three-year
performance period
70thpercentile150%
Target50thpercentile100%
Threshold25thpercentile50%
< Threshold< 25thpercentile0%
tranches.
(1)

Performance measurement occurs at the end of the one-, two-, and three-year periods.

(2)

Vesting occurs at the end

Stock Price Hurdle
(Grant Price: $37.29)
Time to
Achieve Hurdle
Service
Condition
Status as of the two- and three-year periods, subject to continued service.

10/31/22
(3)First Tranche

Interpolate for performance between discrete points.

110% of grant price ($41.02)
2 years1 yearStock price hurdle has not been met
Second Tranche120% of grant price ($44.75)4 years2 yearsStock price hurdle has not been met
Third Tranche130% of grant price ($48.48)5 years3 yearsStock price hurdle has not been met

EPS was chosen because it is a critical driver of long-term stockholder value and because of our focus on bottom-line profitability in the business transformation strategy. Year 1 (fiscal 2019) EPS goals were set after consideration of historical performance, internal budgets, external expectations, and peer group performance.

Relative TSR was chosen as a performance measure because it is a direct measure of stockholder value and rewards for outperformance relative to the broader market.

EPS and relative TSR are weighted equally in determining earned PARSUs. The first segment (42% of total target units) will vest after the end of fiscal 2020, subject to Year 1 EPS performance and relative TSR performance for the first two years. The second segment (58% of total target units) will vest after the end of fiscal 2021, subject to Year 2 EPS performance, Year 3 EPS performance, and relative TSR performance for the three years.

For more information on grants of PARSUs to the NEOs during fiscal 2019, see “Executive Compensation—Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2019.”

2019

2022 RSUs

2019

2022 RSUs and related dividend equivalent units vest ratably on an annual basis over three years from the grant date. Three-year vesting is common in our industry and supports executive retention and alignment with stockholder value.

Proxy Statement55


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Fiscal 20192022 Long-term Incentive Compensation at Target

The following table shows combined total target grant values for annual grants attributable to fiscal 2019. It is important to note that these2022. These values arerepresent target opportunities to earn future value-based compensation and are not actual earned amounts, which will be determined after three yearsthe end of the three-year performance period based on continued employment, stock price growth and performance against pre-established PCSO and PARSU performance goals.
Named Executive OfficerPARSUsPCSOsRSUs
Total Fiscal 2022
Long-term
Incentive Grant
Enrique J. Lores$5,250,000 $5,250,000 $4,500,000 $15,000,000 
Marie Myers$1,710,000 $1,710,000 $2,280,000 $5,700,000 
Julie Jacobs*$— $— $9,000,000 $9,000,000 
Alex Cho$1,725,000 $1,725,000 $2,300,000 $5,750,000 
Tuan Tran$1,725,000 $1,725,000 $2,300,000 $5,750,000 
Christoph Schell**$2,040,000 $2,040,000 $2,720,000 $6,800,000 
*      Ms. Jacobs was hired on October 3, 2022 as Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel and was granted time-vesting restricted stock units in connection with her commencement of employment. The amount of this grant took into account compensation Ms. Jacobs forfeited in leaving her previous employer. She did not receive PARSUs or PCSOs.
**    Mr. Schell left the EPScompany on March 11, 2022 and relative TSR goals.

Named Executive OfficerPARSUsRSUsTotal Fiscal 2019
Long-term Incentive Grant
Dion J. Weisler     $8,700,000     $5,800,000                   $14,500,000
Steven J. Fieler$2,400,000$1,600,000$4,000,000
Enrique J. Lores$3,390,000$2,260,000$5,650,000
Kim M. Rivera$3,000,000$2,000,000$5,000,000
Alex Cho$2,400,000$1,600,000$4,000,000

thereby forfeited all of the PARSUs, PCSOs and RSUs previously granted to him during fiscal 2022.

Values in the Summary Compensation Table are different than the target values described in the table above. In the Summary Compensation Table, consistent with accounting standards, amounts reflect the grant date fair value for the full TSR component (two and three-year performance period), and the EPS component for Year 1 (2019)(2022), for which goals were approved in January 2019.2022, and the grant date fair value for the TSR modifier, consistent with accounting standards. Grant date fair values for the EPS component for Year 2 (2020)(2023) and Year 3 (2021)(2024) are not included in the grant date fair value reported in the Summary Compensation Table since EPS goals for those years are approved in their respective fiscal year.

The Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 20192022 also includes a portion of the fiscal 20182021 PARSUs Year 2 EPS (2019)(2022) and 20172020 PARSUs Year 3 EPS (2019)(2022) for which the goal wasgoals were approved in fiscal 2019.

January 2022.

For more information on grants to the NEOs during fiscal 2019,2022, see “Executive Compensation—Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2019.2022.

2018
58
logo_hp.jpg 

Executive Compensation
Long-term Incentive Compensation – Continuing Performance Awards from Prior Fiscal Years
2021 PARSUs

2018

The design of the fiscal 2021 PARSUs haveis consistent with that of the fiscal 2022 PARSUs.
In November of 2021, the HRC Committee determined that fiscal 2021 EPS for fiscal 2021 PARSUs was achieved at 300% based on actual PARSU EPS performance of $4.08 (target of $2.74). In November of 2022, the HRC Committee determined that fiscal 2022 EPS for fiscal 2021 PARSUs was achieved at 0% (for not having met the threshold) based on actual PARSU EPS performance of $4.01 (target of $4.38). The final payout for fiscal 2021 PARSUs will also depend on performance in fiscal 2023 along with the three-year relative TSR performance.
Metric
PARSU EPS(1) – 100%
Results
Fiscal 2021
EPS
Target: $2.74
Fiscal 2022
EPS
Target: $4.38
Fiscal 2023
EPS
Average
EPS Performance
3-year
TSR Payout Modifier
Total Payout
Fiscal 2021 PARSUs300%0%TBDTBDTBD
icon_arrowf2.jpg 
(1)EPS for PARSU measurement is calculated using non-GAAP Net Earnings adjusted to include bonus at target.
2020 PARSUs
The design of the fiscal 2020 PARSUs is consistent with those of the fiscal 2022 and 2021 PARSUs, except that TSR adds 25% (vs. 50%) if in the top quartile and subtracts 25% (vs. 50%) if in the bottom quartile (with no adjustment from 25th percentile to 75th percentile). Also, maximum payout of the 2020 PARSUs is 200% of target units vs. 300% for 2021 and 2022 PARSUs.
The EPS performance target for fiscal 2022 is the same vesting structure as 2019 PARSUs (chart described above). The actual performance achievement for the one-fiscal 2020, 2021 and two-year periods (i.e.,2022 PARSU awards. As a result, the Year 3 performance level was 0% (for not having met thresholds) based on PARSU EPS performance of $4.01 in fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2018–2019) as a percentage2022 (target of target for the PARSUs as of October 31, 2019 is summarized in the table below:

Actual Performance – Segment 1

EPS vs. Internal GoalsRelative TSR vs. S&P 500(1)
SegmentFiscal 2018 ResultPayoutFiscal 2018-2019 ResultsPayout
Segment 1 (42%)     $1.94     192.9%     15thpercentile     0.0%
Target: $1.81
(1)

Through October 2019, HP’s relative TSR performance was at the 15th percentile of the S&P 500 which corresponds to a payout of 0% of target.

2017 PARSUs

2017 PARSUs have the same vesting structure as 2018 and 2019 PARSUs (chart described above). The actual performance achievement for the two-year period (i.e., fiscal 2017–2018)$4.38), as a percentagedetermined by the HRC Committee in November of target for the HP PARSUs as of October 31, 2018, was summarized in our proxy statement2022.

The 3-year TSR performance for fiscal 2018. years 2020-2022 was at the 76th percentile relative to the TSR performance of other S&P 500 companies during this period, resulting in a modifier of an additional 25% to the 3-year average EPS performance result.
The actual performance achievement for the three-year performance period (i.e., fiscal 2017–2019) as a percentage of target2020-2022) for the HP2020 PARSUs as of October 31, 20192022 is summarized in the table below:

Metric PARSU
EPS(1) – 100%
Results
Fiscal 2020 EPS
Target: $2.32
Fiscal 2021 EPS
Target: $2.74
Fiscal 2022 EPS
Target: $4.38
Average EPS
Performance
3-year TSR Payout
Modifier
Total Payout
Fiscal 2020 PARSUs104.2%200.0%0%101.4%+25%126.4%
pg60-icon_arrowf3.jpg 
Actual Performance – Segment 2(1)

EPS vs. Internal GoalsRelative TSR vs. S&P 500(1)
Segment2018Payout2019PayoutFiscal 2017-2019 ResultsPayout
Segment 2 (58%)                 $1.94     192.9%                 $2.23     122.7%     35thpercentile     70.4%
Target: $1.81Target: $2.18
EPS for PARSU measurement is calculated using non-GAAP Net Earnings adjusted to include bonus at target.

(1)

Through October 2019, HP’s relative TSR performance was at the 35th percentile of the S&P 500 which corresponds to a payout of 70.4% of target.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT59


56www.hpannualmeeting.com
Executive Compensation


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

CEO Transition

Dion Weisler stepped down from his positions as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective November 1, 2019. Upon stepping down from such positions, Mr. Weisler continued to be employed by the Company in a non-executive role as a Senior Executive Advisor. During the period between November 1, 2019 through January 31, 2020, Mr. Weisler’s compensation arrangements remained unchanged from those in place while he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Board approved continuing to employ Mr. Weisler as a Senior Executive Advisor beyond January 31, 2020 through the date of the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders with his compensation consisting solely of his base salary at the monthly rate of $120,833, which was Mr. Weisler’s base salary rate for fiscal year 2019. Mr. Weisler also continued to serve as a member of the Board and will continue to do so until the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. He has not received and will not receive any compensation in connection with his services as a member of the Board.

Fiscal 20202023 Compensation Program

The HRC Committee regularly identifies and evaluates ways to improve our executive compensation program. We believe that our current compensation structure effectively aligns real pay delivery with critical financial and strategic non-financial goals, reinforces year-over-year improvement and growth,our growth-oriented strategy, offers a stable and consistent message to both stockholders and participants, and provides an attractive pay-for-performance incentive opportunity to encourage retention and leadership engagement.

In light of our continued monitoring and evaluation of our executive compensation program, and our engagement with, and feedback from, our stockholders, we believe the structure of our incentive designs as in effect in fiscal 2022 continues to support the Company’s business strategy and align with our compensation philosophy. However, as we plan to discuss in further detail in the fiscal 20202023 proxy statement, we made the following fine-tuning changes that we believe are in our stockholders’ interests and are appropriate to the characteristics and business strategy of the Company,Company:
Annual Incentives: For fiscal 2023 each individual metric may fund up to 200% of target (versus a maximum of 250% of target under the current program). This change will ensure no single metric’s influence on payouts is larger than intended. Also, this funding cap better aligns with typical plan structures of peers.
Long-Term Incentives: For fiscal 2023, the stock price hurdle for the first tranche of the PCSOs will be 15% growth over a three-year period with a one year time-based vesting requirement. This change increases the performance hurdle for the first tranche while also allowing more time for the market to observe and respond to ensure our compensation is tied to our three-year strategic and financial plan:

the execution of HP’s strategy.
Benefits
Our annual incentive continues to focus on Revenue Growth, Net Earnings and Cash Flow goals
We have moved to three-year cliff vesting on our Performance Based equity compensation to align with our annual plan
Grants made for 2020 (granted in Dec 2019) will vest in 2022
The metrics on those performance-based shares consist of EPS with a TSR governor
EPS consists of three annual goals that roll up into our three-year annual EPS plan
Then, a TSR governor is applied to the EPS payout to ensure alignment with our stockholders’ experience
TSR is measured over the full three-year period based on performance against market (S&P 500)
The relative TSR is a market-based governor that adjusts payout so there is alignment with stockholder results

Fiscal 2021 Compensation Program

As the HRC Committee embarks upon our compensation plan design for 2021 and beyond, we will be looking at the most appropriate measures to continue reinforcing the commitments articulated in our long-term financial plans. While EPS and TSR are important measures that tie management and stockholder interest, key metrics like operating profit and cash flow, could be impactful as three-year measures tied to our long-term incentives. Operating profit and cash flow are critical value drivers to deliver on the long-term commitments we have made to stockholders. The final compensation structure will be discussed in more detail in our 2021 proxy.

Benefits

We do not provide our executives, including the NEOs, with special or supplemental U.S. defined benefit pension or health benefits. Our NEOs receive health and welfare benefits (including retiree medical benefits, if eligibility conditions are met) under the same programs and subject to the same eligibility requirements that apply to our employees generally.

Benefits under all U.S. pension plans were frozen effective December 31, 2007. Benefits under the Electronic Data Systems (“EDS”) Pension Plan ceased upon HP’s acquisition of EDS in 2008. As a result, no NEO or any other HP employee accrued a benefit under any HP U.S. defined benefit pension plan during fiscal 2019.2022. The amounts reported as an increase in pension benefits in the Summary Compensation Table are for those NEOs who previously accrued a benefit in a defined benefit pension plan prior to the cessation of accruals and reflect changes in actuarial values only, not additional benefit accruals.

Proxy Statement57


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

The NEOs, along with other executives who earn base pay or an annual incentive in excess of certain limits of the Code or greater than $150,000,$165,000, are eligible to participate in the 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “EDCP”). This plan is maintained to permit executives to defer some of their compensation in order to also defer taxation on such amounts. This is a standard benefit plan also offered by most of our peer group companies. The EDCP permits deferral of base pay in excess of the amount allowed under the qualified HP 401(k) Plan (the “HP 401(k) Plan”) (the 401(k)-deferral deferral limit for calendar 20192022 was $19,000)$20,500) and up to 95% of the annual incentive payable under the Stock Incentive Plan, the PfR Plan and other eligible plans. In addition, we make a 4% matching contribution to the EDCP on base pay contributions in excess of IRS limits up to a maximum of two times that limit (maximum of $11,200$12,200 in calendar 2019)2022). This is the same percentage of matching contributions those executives are eligible to receive under the 401(k) Plan. In effect, the EDCP permits these executives and all eligible employees to receive a 401(k)-type matching contribution on a portion of base-pay deferrals in excess of IRS limits. Amounts deferred or matched under the EDCP are credited with hypothetical investment earnings based on investment options selected by the participant from among nearly all the proprietary funds available to employees under the 401(k) Plan. No amounts earn above-market returns. Benefits payable under the EDCP are unfunded and unsecured.

Executives are also eligible to have a yearly HP-paid medical exam as part of the HP U.S. executive physical program. This includes a comprehensive exam, thorough health assessment and personalized health advice. This benefit is also offered by our peer group companies.

Consistent with its practice of not providing any special or supplemental executive defined benefit programs, including arrangements that would otherwise provide special benefits to the family of a deceased executive, in 2011 the HRC Committee adopted a policy that, unless approved by our stockholders pursuant to an advisory vote, we will not enter into a new plan, program or agreement or modify an existing plan, program or agreement with a Section 16 officer (including the NEOs) that provides for payments, grants or awards following the death of the officer in the form of unearned salary or unearned annual incentives, accelerated vesting or the continuation in force of unvested equity grants, perquisites, and other payments or awards made in lieu of compensation, except to the extent that such payments, grants or awards are provided or made available to our employees generally.

We provide our executives with financial counseling services to assist them in obtaining professional financial advice, a common benefit among our peer group companies, for convenience and to increase the understanding and effectiveness of our executive compensation program.

Limited Perquisites

We provide a small number of perquisites to our senior executives, including the NEOs. For a list of all perquisites provided to our NEOs for fiscal 2019,2022, please refer to the“Fiscal 2022 All Other Compensation TableTable” on page 62.

Due66.

60
logo_hp.jpg 

Executive Compensation
HP maintains one corporate aircraft due to our global presence, we maintain onepresence. For security, safety, effectiveness and efficiency purposes, the Company allows executives to use the corporate aircraft.aircraft for personal reasons. The CEO is required by the Board to use corporate aircraft for all travel, including personal travel. In the event aan NEO is accompanied by a guest or family member on the aircraft for personal reasons, as approved by the CEO or CLO, the NEO is taxed on the value of this usage according to the relevant Code rules. There is norules of the Internal Revenue Code. We do not provide tax gross-up paid ongross-ups for the imputed income attributable to this value.personal use. Among our NEOs, Mr. WeislerLores is the only executive thatwho used the corporate aircraft for personal use during fiscal 2019, which was2022.
In addition, we cover the costs of financial counseling, tax preparation and estate planning services for conveniencecertain of our executives. These services provide these executives with a better understanding of their compensation and security.

Our Auditbenefits and allow them to focus their attention on our future success.

We consider specific personal security measures (for example, security personnel or the installation and maintenance of security measures in and around an executive’s residence) to be appropriate expenses that arise out of the executive’s employment responsibilities and that are necessary to his or her job performance and to ensure the safety of the covered executive and his or her family. The Board and the HRC Committee periodically conducts global risk management reviews, which include reviewing homereview and approve the amount and nature of executive officers’ security services of NEOs. Services considered necessary by the Audit Committee may be paid for by HP, due to the range of security issues that may be encountered by key executives of any large, multinational corporation.

expenses.

Termination and Change in Control Protections

Severance

The HRC Committee is focused on ensuring that the severance and Long-term Incentive Change in Control Plan for Executive Officers

Ourchange of control protections available to our executives are consistent with market practice, provide clarity to prospective and current executives, and will help attract and retain talent. Consistent with this approach, our Section 16 officers (including all of the NEOs) are covered by the Amended and Restated Severance and Long-termLong-Term Incentive Change in Control Plan for Executive Officers (“SPEO”(the “SPEO”), whichas subsequently amended. The SPEO is intended to protect usour executives and our stockholders, and provide a level of transition assistance in the event of an involuntary termination of employment. We have not entered into individual employment agreements or any severance or change in control agreements with our current NEOs.

Severance and Long-Term Incentive Change in Control Plan for Executive Officers
Under the SPEO, participants who incur an involuntary termination (i.e., a termination not for cause), and who execute a full and effective release of claims following such termination, are eligible to receive severance benefits in an amount determined as a multiple of base pay, plus the average of either the actual annual incentives paid for the preceding three years.years or target bonus if the executive has received less than three full fiscal year annual cash bonuses at his or her seniority level as of immediately prior to such termination. In the case of the NEOs other than the CEO, the multiplier is 1.5. In the case of the CEO, the multiplier is 2.0. In all cases, this benefit will not exceed 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s base pay plus target annual incentive as in effect immediately prior to the termination of employment.

Although most of the compensation for our executives is performance-based and largely contingent upon the achievement of financial goals, the HRC Committee continues to believe that the SPEO is appropriate for the attraction and retention of executive talent. In addition, we find it more equitable to offer severance benefits based on a standard formula for the Section 16 officers (including all of the NEOs) because severance often serves as a bridge when employment is involuntarily terminated, and should therefore not be affected by other, longer-term accumulations. As a result, and consistent with the practice of our peer group companies, other compensation decisions are not generally based ontied to the existence of this severance protection.

58www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

In addition to the cash benefit, SPEO participants are eligible to receive (1) a pro-rata annual incentive for the year of termination based on actual performance results, at the discretion of the HRC Committee, (2) pro-rata vesting of unvested equity awards (and for performance-based equity awards, only if any applicable performance conditions have been satisfied)satisfied as of the end of the applicable performance period), and (3) payment of a lump-sum health-benefit stipend of an amount equal to 18 months’ COBRA premiums for continued group medical coverage for the executive and his or her eligible dependents.

Severance Benefits in the Event of a Change in Control underUnder the SPEO

In order to better ensure the retention of our executive leadership team in the event of a potentially disruptive corporate transaction, the

The SPEO also includes change in control terms for our NEOs. In addition to theThe benefits provided for involuntary terminations under the SPEO are also provided in connection with a voluntary termination for Good Reason (as defined in the plan) that occurs within 24 months after a change in control (“double trigger”). In addition, the SPEO provides for full vesting of outstanding stock options, RSUs, PCSOs and PARSUs upon involuntary termination not for Cause or voluntary termination for Good Reason (as defined in the plan) within 24 months after a change in control, (“double trigger”), and in situations where equity awards are not assumed by the surviving corporation (a “modified double trigger”). The SPEO further provides that under either a double trigger PARSUs will vest based on target performance, whereas under aor modified double trigger, PARSUs and PCSOs will vest based upon the greater of the number of PARSUs that would vest based on actual performance andwith respect to the number of PARSUs that would vest pro-rata based uponawards for which the applicable performance period has ended or target performance. We doperformance with respect to the awards for which the applicable performance period has not provide tax gross ups in connection with terminations, including terminations inended (with vested PCSOs remaining exercisable for one year following the event of a change in control.

The HRC Committee is focused on ensuring that the change of control provisions in the SPEO are consistent with market practice, provide clarity to prospective and current executives, and will help attract and retain talent.

Amendment and Restatement of SPEO

Effective February 28, 2020, HP adopted an Amended and Restated Severance and Long-Term Incentive Change in Control Plan for Executive Officers. Under the SPEO as amended and restated, in the event of a change in control of HP, all outstanding and unvested equity will vest either in full if the successor does not assume such awards or if an individual is terminated without Cause or terminates with Good Reason within 24 months of a change in control, with performance-based awards that remain subject to performance criteria as of the date of the qualifying termination or change in control, as applicable, vesting based on target levels of performance.date). In addition, under the SPEO as amended and restated, in the event of any dispute under the SPEO relating to a participant’s termination of employment within 24 months following a change in control, the Company will reimburse all related legal fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the participant if claims are brought in good faith. Other than these provisions,We do not provide tax gross ups in connection with terminations, including terminations in the termsevent of the SPEO as amended and restated are substantially similara change in all material respects to the terms of the SPEO as in effect prior to the amendment and restatement as described herein.

control.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT61

Executive Compensation
Other Compensation-Related Matters

Succession Planning

Among the HRC Committee’s responsibilities described in its charter is to oversee succession planning and leadership development. TheIn addition, the full Board plans for succession of the CEO and annually reviews senior management selection and succession planning that is undertaken by the HRC Committee.planning. As part of this process, the independent Directors annually review the HRC Committee’s recommended candidates for senior management positions to see that qualified candidates are available for all positions and that development plans are being utilized to strengthen the skills and qualifications of the candidates.
The criteria used when assessing the qualifications of potential CEO successors include, among others, strategic vision and leadership, operational excellence, financial management, executive officer leadership development, ability to motivate employees, and an ability to develop an effective working relationship with the Board. We also host a Board Buddy program through which each executive officer is aligned to a board member as a mentor to aid the executive’s development while giving board members a deeper understanding of the day-to-day operations of the Company.

In fiscal 2019,2022, an executive talent review was conducted along with succession plans for each of the executive leaders. Successors were identified to reflecthaving the necessary skill sets, performance, potential, and diversity.diversity were identified. Development plans for successors were also established to ensure readiness and those will be managed throughout the coming year. In addition to the annual succession planning process, the HRC Committee participates in an in-depth performance discussion of each executive officer at the time of the annual compensation review. During fiscal 2019, we leveraged our robust, in-depth succession planning to successfully maneuver through various leadership changes onFurther, the executive team. We executed a CEO assessment process in partnership with the Board to identify internal and external candidates for Mr. Weisler’s replacement, which led to unanimous Board support for Mr. Lores. We also shifted other executives into new or expanded roles based on business needs and tied to succession and development plans. Further, there is a People Update at each HRC Committee meeting,receives regular People Updates at HRC Committee meetings throughout the year, which includes a review of key people processes and developments for that quarter.

Proxy Statement59


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

In addition, the executive team participated in a robustteam and individual development process that included individual assessments, interviews with executive coaches, and an individualized development plan that can be leverageddiscussions throughout the year. Development themes for the entireNew external executive team will be addressed during quarterly face-to-face meetings formembers also completed an assessment and onboarding process to ensure their full integration into the team development.

and maximize their effectiveness.

Stock Ownership Guidelines and Prohibition on Hedging

and Pledging

Our stock ownership guidelines are designed to align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders and mitigate compensation-related risk. The current guidelines provide that, within five years of assuming a designated position, the CEO should attain an investment position in our stock equal to seven times his base salary and all other Section 16 officers reporting directly to the CEO should attain an investment position equal to five times their base salaries. Our NEOs are on pace to meet the stock ownership guidelines within the allotted time frame.
Shares counted toward these guidelines include any shares held by the executive directly or through a broker, shares held through the 401(k) Plan, shares held as restricted stock and shares underlying time-vested RSUs, and shares underlying vested but unexercisedRSUs. Beginning in fiscal 2021, we no longer count stock options (50% of the in-the-money value of such options is used for this calculation). Mr. Weisler is the only NEO who has served in a role covered by ourtoward stock ownership guidelines for over five years and his ownership exceeds the current guidelines. Our other NEOs are on pace to meet the stock ownership guidelines within the allotted time frame.

We also do not include shares in ongoing PARSU cycles.

The HRC Committee has adopted a policy prohibiting all employees, including executive officers, and Directors from engaging in any form of hedging transaction (derivatives, equity swaps, forwards, etc.) involving Company securities, including, among other things, short sales and transactions involving publicly traded options. In addition, with limited exceptions, our executive officers are prohibited from holding our securities in margin accounts and from pledging our securities as collateral for loans. We believe that these policies further align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders.

Policy for Recoupment of Performance-Based Incentives
In fiscal 2006, the Board adopted a “clawback” policy that allows the Board discretion to recover certain annual incentives from senior executives (including the NEOs) whose fraud or misconduct resulted in a significant restatement of financial results. The policy specifically allows for the recovery of annual incentives paid at or above target from those senior executives whose fraud or misconduct resulted in the restatement where the annual incentives would have been lower absent the fraud or misconduct, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Additionally, our incentive plan document (and award agreements) allows for the recoupment of performance-based annual incentives and long-term incentives consistent with applicable law and the clawback policy.
In addition, in fiscal 2014, we added a provision to our grant agreements to clarify that equity awards are subject to the clawback policy. Award agreements also provide the Board discretion to recover certain outstanding cash and equity awards for fraud or misconduct that results in reputational harm to HP even when such fraud or misconduct does not result in a significant restatement of financial results.
Accounting and Tax Effects

The impact of accounting treatment is considered in developing and implementing our compensation programs, including the accounting treatment as it applies to amounts awarded or paid to our executives.

The impact of federal tax laws on our compensation programs is also considered, including the deductibility of compensation paid to the NEOs, as limited by Section 162(m) of the Code. For prior fiscal years, Section 162(m) included an exception from the deductibility limitation for qualified “performance-based compensation.” This exception, however, has been repealed for tax years beginning in fiscal 2019 under the
62
logo_hp.jpg 

Executive Compensation
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. As such, compensation paid to certain of our executive officers in excess of $1.0 million is not deductible unless it qualifies for certain transition relief applicable for compensation paid pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect as of November 2, 2017. In addition, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act increased the scope of individuals subject to the deduction limitation. Thus, compensation originally intended to satisfy the requirements for exemption from Section 162(m) may not be fully deductible. Although our compensation program may take into consideration the Section 162(m) rules as a factor, these considerations will not necessarily limit compensation to amounts deductible under Section 162(m). Despite the modifications to Section 162(m), the HRC Committee intends to continue to implement compensation programs that it believes are competitive and in the best interests of HP and its stockholders.

Policy for Recoupment of Performance-Based Incentives

In fiscal 2006, the Board adopted a “clawback” policy that provides Board discretion to recover certain annual incentives from senior executives (including the NEOs) whose fraud or misconduct resulted in a significant restatement of financial results. The policy specifically allows for the recovery of annual incentives paid at or above target from those senior executives whose fraud or misconduct resulted in the restatement where the annual incentives would have been lower absent the fraud or misconduct, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Additionally, our incentive plan document (and award agreements) allow for the recoupment of performance-based annual incentives and long-term incentives consistent with applicable law and the clawback policy.

Also, in fiscal 2014, we added a provision to our grant agreements to clarify that equity awards are subject to the clawback policy. Award agreements also provide Board discretion to cause forfeiture of certain outstanding cash and equity awards for fraud or misconduct that results in reputational harm to HP even when such fraud or misconduct does not result in a significant restatement of financial results.

60www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

HR and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

The HRC Committee of the Board of HP has reviewed and discussed with management this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on this review and discussion, it has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HP filed for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019.

2022.

HR and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Stephanie A. Burns, Chair
Aida Alvarez
Shumeet Banerji
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
Stacey Mobley

Bruce Broussard
2023 PROXY STATEMENT63

Executive Compensation
Executive Compensation Tables
Fiscal 20192022 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal years 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, as applicable. Per SEC reporting guidelines, our NEOs for fiscal 20192022 include our CEO (Mr. Weisler)Lores), our CFO (Mr. Fieler)(Ms. Myers), and the next three most highly compensated individuals still serving as executive officers at year end (Mr. Lores, Ms. Rivera, and Mr. Cho) as of the last day of the fiscal year, (OctoberOctober 31, 2019)2022 (Ms. Jacobs, Mr. Cho, and Mr. Tran).

Name and Principal
Position
  Year  Salary(2)
($)
  Stock
Awards(3)
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation(4)
($)
  Change
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)
($)
  All Other
Compensation(6)
($)
  Total
($)
Dion J. Weisler(1)
former President and CEO
20191,450,00014,531,2933,233,533103,14619,317,972
20181,400,00012,737,0044,984,34894,18219,215,534
20171,300,0339,841,2003,511,56077,23214,730,025
Steven J. Fieler
Chief Financial Officer
2019690,0003,427,818961,69733214,9505,094,797
2018550,0002,382,017793,63221019,4043,745,263
Enrique J. Lores(1)
President and CEO (formerly President, Imaging,
Printing and Solutions)
2019750,0005,527,211873,52248,1557,198,888
2018750,0004,623,6861,579,33143,9736,996,990
 2017725,0193,075,3701,219,03523,7865,043,210
Kim M. Rivera
President, Strategy and Business Management and Chief Legal Officer
2019725,0004,717,5981,078,44854,7056,575,751
2018675,0003,088,7321,438,69972,9275,275,358
2017645,0162,255,2641,088,921193,0814,182,282
Alex Cho
President, Personal Systems

2019675,0003,427,8181,271,88267,76016,7955,459,255
 
Mr. Schell left the company on March 11, 2022 but was included as an NEO as his total compensation would have made him one of the three most highly compensated individuals had he been serving as an executive officer at fiscal year end.
Name and Principal
Position
Year
Salary(3)
($)
Bonus(4)
($)
Stock
Awards
(5)
($)
Option
Awards
(6)
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(7)
($)
Change in Pension  
Value and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
(8)
($)
All Other
Compensation
(9)
($)
Total
($)
Enrique J. Lores
President and CEO
20221,250,000 — 12,844,359 5,341,057 1,445,564 — 198,946 21,079,926 
20211,200,000 — 10,558,022 4,107,368 4,440,000 — 428,416 20,733,806 
20201,100,000 — 7,976,875 — 3,261,085 — 219,555 12,557,515 
Marie Myers
Chief Financial Officer
2022780,000 — 3,670,097 1,739,653 608,871 — 90,256 6,888,877 
2021664,445 250,000 3,185,034 1,216,998 1,794,000 — 111,091 7,221,568 
2020329,313 — 1,749,997 — 605,084 — 4,302 2,688,696 
Julie Jacobs(1)
Chief Legal Officer &
General Counsel
202258,333 9,000,011 — 32,271 — — 9,090,615 
Alex Cho
President, Personal
Systems
2022780,000 — 5,610,175 1,754,919 582,546 — 42,670 8,770,310 
2021740,000 — 4,552,967 1,673,373 1,998,002 15 43,426 9,007,783 
2020703,000 — 3,571,232 — 1,328,883 49,881 23,563 5,676,559 
Tuan Tran
President, Print
2022780,000 — 5,503,615 1,754,919 608,871 — 44,153 8,691,558 
2021715,000 — 4,066,688 1,673,373 1,785,712 5,418 78,876 8,325,067 
Christoph Schell(2)
Former Chief
Commercial Officer
2022300,093 — 6,660,174 2,075,376 — — 33,937 9,069,580 
2021760,000 — 5,427,349 1,977,620 2,052,000 — 41,000 10,257,969 
2020722,000 — 4,462,000 1,290,846 — 40,600 6,515,446 
(1)Ms. Jacobs was hired on October 3, 2022 as the Company’s Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel.
(2)Mr. Schell left the company on March 11, 2022.
(3)Amounts shown represent base salary earned or paid during the fiscal year, as described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Fiscal 2022 Executive Compensation—2022 Base Salary.”
(4)In fiscal 2021 Ms. Myers received a one-time lump sum cash payment of $250,000 in connection with her appointment as Acting Chief Financial Officer, while continuing to lead our Transformation and IT organization.
(5)The grant date fair value of all stock awards has been calculated in accordance with applicable accounting standards. In the case of RSUs, the value is determined by multiplying the number of units granted by the closing price of our stock on the grant date. For PARSUs awarded in fiscal 2022, they include both internal (EPS) goals and the market-related (TSR) performance modifier as described under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Fiscal 2022 Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation—Awards from Fiscal 2022.” Amounts shown reflect the grant date fair value of the first tranche of the 2022 PARSUs for which the EPS goal has been established (i.e., for fiscal 2022) based on the probable outcome of performance conditions related to these PARSUs at the grant date. Consistent with the applicable accounting standards, the grant date fair value of the market related TSR modifier has been determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Further, consistent with accounting standards, grant date fair value reflects the EPS portion of the award for Year 1 only, for which goals were approved in January 2022. This value also reflects grant date fair value of the 2021 PARSU award for Year 2 (fiscal 2022 EPS) and the EPS portion of the 2020 PARSU award for Year 3 (fiscal 2022 EPS), for which goals were approved in January 2022. The table below sets forth the grant date fair value for the fiscal 2022 EPS of the 2022 PARSUs granted on December 7, 2021, the fiscal 2022 EPS of the 2021 PARSUs granted on December 7, 2020, and the fiscal 2022 EPS portion of the 2020 PARSUs granted on December 6, 2019:
(1)Mr. Weisler stepped down as our President and Chief Executive Officer on November 1, 2019 at which time Mr. Lores was appointed to the role. Upon stepping down from such positions, Mr. Weisler continues to be employed by the Company as Senior Executive Advisor, a non-executive officer role, until the date of our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. Weisler will also continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors until the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
(2)64Amounts shown represent base salary earned or paid during the fiscal year, as described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Fiscal 2019 Executive Compensation—2019 Base Salary.
logo_hp.jpg 


Proxy Statement61


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

(3)The grant date fair value of all stock awards has been calculated in accordance with applicable accounting standards. In the case of RSUs, the value is determined by multiplying the number of units granted by the closing price of our stock on the grant date. For PARSUs awarded in fiscal 2019, amounts shown reflect the grant date fair value of the PARSUs for the two- and three-year vesting periods beginning with fiscal 2019 based on the probable outcome of performance conditions related to these PARSUs at the grant date. The 2019 PARSUs include both internal (EPS) and market-related (TSR) performance goals as described under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Fiscal 2019 Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” Consistent with the applicable accounting standards, the grant date fair value of the market related TSR component has been determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Further, consistent with accounting standards, grant date fair value reflects the EPS portion of the award for Year 1 only, for which goals were approved in January 2019. This value also reflects grant date fair value of the EPS portion of the 2018 PARSU award for Year 2 (fiscal 2019 EPS) and the EPS portion of the 2017 PARSU award for Year 3 (fiscal 2019 EPS), for which goals were approved in January 2019. The table below sets forth the grant date fair value for the 2019 PARSUs granted on December 7, 2018; the fiscal 2019 EPS portion of the 2018 PARSUs granted on December 7, 2017 and the fiscal 2019 EPS portion of the 2017 PARSUs granted on December 7, 2016:

Name     Date of
Original
PARSU Grant
     Probable Outcome of
Performance Conditions
Grant Date Fair Value
($)*
     Maximum Outcome of
Performance Conditions
Grant Date Fair Value
($)*
     Market-related
Component Grant Date
Fair Value
($)**
Dion J. Weisler12/7/20181,223,5522,447,1054,805,041
12/7/20171,270,8942,541,788
12/7/20161,431,8002,863,600
Steven J. Fieler12/7/2018337,537675,0741,325,534
7/1/2018164,737329,475
Enrique J. Lores12/7/2018476,761953,5231,872,307
12/7/2017470,699941,398
12/7/2016447,439894,878
Kim M. Rivera12/7/2018421,905843,8101,656,910
12/7/2017310,656621,312
12/7/2016328,127656,255
Alex Cho12/7/2018337,537675,0741,325,534
7/1/2018164,737329,475
*Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of the PARSUs subject to the internal EPS performance goal (i) based on the probable or target outcome as of the date the goals were set and (ii) based on achieving the maximum level of performance for the performance period beginning in fiscal 2019. The grant date fair value of the 2019 PARSUs Year 1 EPS units awarded on December 7, 2018, of the 2018 PARSUs Year 2 EPS units awarded on December 7, 2017 (or for Mr. Fieler’s and Mr. Cho’s grants, on July 1, 2018) and of the 2017 PARSUs Year 3 EPS units awarded on December 7, 2016 was $21.05 per unit, which was the closing share price of our common stock on January 16, 2019 when the EPS goal was approved. The values of 2019 PARSUs Year 2 and Year 3 EPS units will not be available until January 2020 and January 2021 respectively, and therefore are not included for fiscal 2019, but will be included for their respective fiscal years.
**Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of PARSUs subject to the market related TSR goal component of the PARSUs, for which expense recognition is not subject to probable or maximum outcome assumptions. The grant date fair value of the market related TSR goal component of the PARSUs granted December 7, 2018 was $27.56 per unit, which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The significant assumptions used in this simulation model were a volatility rate of 26.5%, a risk-free interest rate of 2.7%, and a simulation period of 2.9 years. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the awards, refer to Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019, as filed with the SEC on December 12, 2019.
(4)Amounts shown represent payouts under the annual PfR incentive (amounts earned during the applicable fiscal year but paid after the end of that fiscal year).Executive Compensation
(5)Amounts shown represent the increase in the actuarial present value of NEO pension benefits during the applicable fiscal year. As described in more detail under the heading “Narrative to the Fiscal 2019 Pension Benefits Table” below, pension accruals have generally ceased for all NEOs, and NEOs hired after the dates that pension accruals ceased are not eligible to participate in any U.S. defined benefit pension plan. The only exception for the NEOs listed above is that Mr. Cho participates in the International Retirement Guarantee (IRG) which is provided to a small closed group of employees who have transferred between countries with pension/retirement indemnity plans. Mr. Cho will not accrue additional benefits under the IRG unless he transfers outside of the US with HP Inc. for an extended period of time. Accordingly, the amounts reported for the NEOs do not reflect additional accruals but reflect the passage of one more year from the prior present value calculation and changes in other actuarial assumptions. The assumptions used in calculating the changes in pension benefits are described in footnote (2) to the “Fiscal 2019 Pension Benefits Table” below. No HP plan provides for above-market earnings on deferred compensation amounts, so the amounts reported in this column do not reflect any such earnings.
(6)The amounts shown are detailed in the “Fiscal 2019 All Other Compensation Table” below.

NameDate of
Original
PARSU
Grant
Probable
Outcome of
Performance
Conditions
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)*
Maximum
Outcome of
Performance
Conditions
Grant Date Fair
Value
($)*
Market-related
Component Grant
Date Fair Value
($)**
Enrique J. Lores12/7/20211,409,372 4,228,116 1,159,234 
12/7/20201,868,089 5,604,267 
12/6/20193,907,656 7,815,312 
Marie Myers12/7/2021459,029 1,377,087 377,581 
12/7/2020553,502 1,660,506 
Tuan Tran12/7/2021463,045 1,389,135 380,885 
12/7/2020761,085 2,283,255 
12/6/20191,598,590 3,197,180 
Alex Cho12/7/2021463,045 1,389,135 380,885 
12/7/2020761,085 2,283,255 
12/6/20191,705,150 3,410,300 
Christoph Schell12/7/2021547,615 1,642,845 450,445 
12/7/2020899,460 2,698,380 
12/6/20192,042,647 4,085,294 
*    Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of the PARSUs subject to the internal EPS performance goal (i) based on the probable or target outcome as of the date the goals were set and (ii) based on achieving the maximum level of performance for the performance period beginning in fiscal 2022. The grant date fair value of the 2022 PARSUs Year 1 EPS units awarded on December 7, 2021, 2021 PARSUs Year 2 EPS units awarded on December 7, 2020 and 2020 PARSUs Year 3 EPS units awarded on December 6, 2019 was $38.99 per unit, which was the closing share price of our common stock on January 12, 2022 when the EPS goal was approved. The values of 2022 PARSUs Year 2 and Year 3 EPS units will not be available until January 2023 and January 2024, respectively, and therefore are not included for fiscal 2022, but will be included for their respective fiscal years.
**    Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of PARSUs subject to the market related TSR modifier of the PARSUs, for which expense recognition is not subject to probable or maximum outcome assumptions. The grant date fair value of the market related TSR modifier of the PARSUs granted December 7, 2021 was $10.69 per unit, which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The significant assumptions used in this simulation model were a volatility rate of 41.57%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.96%, and a simulation period of 2.9 years. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the awards, refer to Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC on December 6, 2022.
(6)The grant date fair value of PCSO awards is calculated using a combination of a Monte Carlo simulation model and a lattice model, as these awards contain market conditions. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the awards, refer to Note 5 of our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC on December 6, 2022.
(7)Amounts shown represent payouts under the annual incentive (amounts earned during the applicable fiscal year but paid after the end of that fiscal year).
(8)Amounts shown represent the increase in the actuarial present value of NEO pension benefits during the applicable fiscal year. The values are reflected as “$0” for Mr. Cho and Mr. Tran because of the drop in change in pension values of $123,602 and $264,237, respectively, due to the significant change in discount rates. As described in more detail under the heading “Narrative to the Fiscal 20192022 Pension Benefits Table” below, pension accruals have generally ceased for all NEOs, and NEOs hired after the dates that pension accruals ceased are not eligible to participate in any U.S. defined benefit pension plan. The only exception for the NEOs listed above is Mr. Cho who participates in the International Retirement Guarantee (IRG), which is provided to a small, closed group of employees who have transferred between countries with pension/retirement indemnity plans. Mr. Cho will not accrue additional benefits under the IRG unless he transfers outside of the US with HP Inc. for an extended period of time. Accordingly, the amounts reported for the NEOs do not reflect additional accruals but reflect the passage of one more year from the prior present value calculation, Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan returns, and changes in other actuarial assumptions. The assumptions used in calculating the changes in pension benefits are described in footnote (2) to the “Fiscal 2022 Pension Benefits Table.” No HP plan provides for above-market earnings on deferred compensation amounts, so the amounts reported in this column do not reflect any such earnings.
(9)The amounts shown are detailed in the “Fiscal 2022 All Other Compensation Table” below.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT65

Executive Compensation
Fiscal 2022 All Other Compensation Table

The following table provides additional information about the amounts that appear in the “All Other Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table” above.

Name    401(k)
Company
Match(1)
($)
    NQDC
Company
Match(2)
($)
    Mobility
Program(3)
($)
    Security
Services/
Systems(4)
($)
    Personal
Aircraft
Usage(5)
($)
    Non-U.S. Tax
Gross-Up(6)
($)
    Miscellaneous(7)
($)
    Total
AOC
($)
Dion J. Weisler11,20010,80015,9372,70736,6549,07316,775103,146
Steven J. Fieler11,2003,75014,950
Enrique J. Lores11,20011,0007,8956018,00048,155
Kim M. Rivera11,20026,79616,70954,705
Alex Cho11,2004,92067516,795
Name
401(k)  Company
Match
(1)
($)
NQDC Company
Match
(2)
($)
Mobility
Program
(3)
($)
Security Services/
Systems
(4)
($)
Personal Aircraft
Usage
(5)
($)
Miscellaneous(6)
($)
Total
AOC
($)
Enrique J. Lores12,20011,60045022,239119,63132,826198,946
Marie Myers12,20011,60048,02718,42990,256
Julie Jacobs
Alex Cho12,20011,60018,87042,670
Tuan Tran12,20010,9252,21718,81144,153
Christoph Schell11,40022,53733,937
(1)Represents matching contributions made under the HP 401(k) Plan that were earned for 2022.
(2)Represents matching contributions credited during fiscal 2022 under the HP Executive Deferred Compensation Plan with respect to the 2021 calendar year of that plan.
(3)For Mr. Lores and Mr. Tran, represents tax preparation, filing, equalization and compliance services paid under HP’s tax assistance due to business travel in Korea. Due to the taxation impact on US taxpayers who travel to Korea on business and the increase in business travel to Korea due to our acquisition of Samsung’s Print business, the HRC Committee approved a Tax Assistance Program during its July 2017 meeting that covers our Section 16 officers. The program has the same characteristics as the existing tax equalization program for all other employees. Both programs together ensure a tax neutral scenario for all HP employees who must comply with Korean tax requirements due to business travel to Korea.
(4)Represents home security services provided to the NEOs and, consistent with SEC guidance, the incremental cost associated with these services is reported here as a perquisite. For the CEO and CFO, we provided a home security evaluation and residential security systems. At times, we may provide security for the CEO and CFO, which included personal security services provided during business-related travel and at business facilities, as needed to address security concerns arising out of our business. We consider personal security measures to be appropriate expenses that arise out of the executive’s employment responsibilities and that are necessary to his or her job performance and to ensure the safety of the covered executive and his or her family. We believe that all Company-incurred security costs are reasonable and necessary and for the Company’s benefit. The Board and the HR & Compensation Committee periodically review and approve the amount and nature of executive officers’ security expenses.
(5)Represents the value of personal usage of HP corporate aircraft. For purposes of reporting the value of such personal usage in this table, we use data provided by an outside firm to calculate the hourly cost of operating the Company’s aircraft. These costs include the cost of fuel, maintenance, landing and parking fees, crew, catering and supplies. For trips by NEOs that involve mixed personal and business usage, we include the incremental cost of such personal usage (i.e., the excess of the cost of the actual trip over the cost of a hypothetical trip without the personal usage). For income tax purposes, the amounts included in NEO income are calculated based on the standard industry fare level valuation method. No tax gross ups are provided for this imputed income.
(6)Includes other amounts paid either directly to the executives or on their behalf, including financial counseling, tax preparation and estate planning services, as discussed further in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” For Mr. Lores, the amount includes $14,826 personal ground transportation expenses incurred while on business trips. For Ms. Myers, the amount includes expenses for executive physicals. For Mr. Cho, the amount includes $17,250 for financial counseling services that was incurred in fiscal 2021 but not billed until fiscal 2022, and a wellness incentive. For Mr. Tran, the amount includes a wellness incentive and expenses for executive physicals. Mr. Schell’s amount includes financial counseling services that were incurred in fiscal 2021 but not billed until fiscal 2022. All U.S. employees are eligible to receive the wellness incentive.
(1)Represents matching contributions made under the HP 401(k) Plan that were earned for fiscal year 2019.
(2)66Represents matching contributions credited during fiscal 2019 under the HP Executive Deferred Compensation Plan with respect to the 2018 calendar year of that plan.
logo_hp.jpg 


62www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

(3)For Ms. Rivera, represents benefits provided under our domestic executive mobility program. For Mr. Weisler and Mr. Lores, represents tax preparation, filing, equalization and compliance services paid under HP’s tax assistance due to business travel in Korea. Due to the taxation impact on US taxpayers who travel to Korea on business and the increase in Korea travel due to our acquisition of Samsung’s Print business, the HRC Committee approved a Tax Assistance Program during its July 2017 meeting that covers our Section 16 officers. The program has the same characteristics as the existing tax equalization program for all other employees. Both programs together ensure a tax neutral scenario for all HP employees who must comply with Korean tax requirements due to business travel to Korea.
(4)Represents home security services provided to the NEOs and, consistent with SEC guidance, the expense is reported here as a perquisite since there is an incidental personal benefit.Executive Compensation
(5)Represents the value of personal usage of HP corporate aircraft. For purposes of reporting the value of such personal usage in this table, we use data provided by an outside firm to calculate the hourly cost of operating each type of aircraft. These costs include the cost of fuel, maintenance, landing and parking fees, crew, catering and supplies. For trips by NEOs that involve mixed personal and business usage, we include the incremental cost of such personal usage (i.e., the excess of the cost of the actual trip over the cost of a hypothetical trip without the personal usage). For income tax purposes, the amounts included in NEO income are calculated based on the standard industry fare level valuation method. No tax gross ups are provided for this imputed income.
(6)Represents tax gross up costs for Korean, California state and U.S. social taxes under HP’s Tax Assistance Program for Korea business travel.
(7)Includes amounts paid either directly to the executives or on their behalf for financial counseling, tax preparation and estate planning services.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2019

2022

The following table provides information on annual PfR incentive awards for fiscal 20192022 and awards of RSUs, PCSOs and PARSUs granted during fiscal 20192022 as a part of our long-term incentive program:




Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(2)
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units(3)
(#)
   Grant-Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(2)
($)
Name   Grant
Date
   Threshold
($)
   Target
($)
   Maximum
($)
   Threshold
(#)
   Target
(#)
   Maximum
(#)
Dion J. Weisler
PfR29,0002,900,0005,800,000
RSU12/7/2018252,9445,800,006
PARSU12/7/2018116,253232,506465,0126,028,593
PARSU12/7/201730,18860,375120,7501,270,894
PARSU12/7/201634,01068,019136,0381,431,800
Steven J. Fieler
PfR8,625862,5001,725,000
RSU12/7/201869,7781,600,010
PARSU12/7/201832,07064,140128,2801,663,071
PARSU7/1/20183,9137,82615,652164,737
Enrique J. Lores
PfR9,375937,5001,875,000
RSU12/7/201898,5612,260,004
PARSU12/7/201845,29990,597181,1942,349,069
PARSU12/7/201711,18122,36144,722470,699
PARSU12/7/201610,62821,25642,512447,439
Kim M. Rivera
PfR9,063906,2501,812,500
RSU12/7/201887,2222,000,000
PARSU12/7/201840,08780,174160,3482,078,815
PARSU12/7/20177,37914,75829,516310,656
PARSU12/7/20167,79415,58831,176328,127
Alex Cho
PfR8,438843,7501,687,500
RSU12/7/201869,7781,600,010
PARSU12/7/201832,07064,140128,2801,663,071
PARSU7/1/20183,9137,82615,652164,737
NameGrant
Date
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Units
(3)
(#)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(4)
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant-
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and Option
Awards
(2)
($)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Enrique J. Lores
Annual Incentive25,000 2,500,000 5,000,000 
RSU12/7/2021120,676 4,500,008 
PCSO12/7/2021498,543 37.295,341,057 
PARSU12/7/202118,074 36,147 108,441 2,568,606 
PARSU12/7/202023,956 47,912 143,736 1,868,089 
PARSU12/6/201950,111 100,222 200,444 3,907,656 
Marie Myers
Annual Incentive10,530 1,053,000 2,106,000 
RSU12/7/202161,142 2,279,985 
PCSO12/7/2021162,382 37.291,739,653 
PARSU12/7/20215,887 11,773 35,319 836,610 
PARSU12/7/20207,098 14,196 42,588 553,502 
Julie Jacobs
Annual Incentive583 58,333 116,667 
RSU10/3/2022347,625 9,000,011 
Alex Cho
Annual Incentive10,530 1,053,000 2,106,000 
RSU12/7/202161,679 2,300,010 
PCSO12/7/2021163,807 37.291,754,919 
PARSU12/7/20215,938 11,876 35,628 843,930 
PARSU12/7/20209,760 19,520 58,560 761,085 
PARSU12/6/201921,867 43,733 87,466 1,705,150 
Tuan Tran
Annual Incentive10,530 1,053,000 2,106,000 
RSU12/7/202161,679 2,300,010 
PCSO12/7/2021163,807 37.291,754,919 
PARSU12/7/20215,938 11,876 35,628 843,930 
PARSU12/7/20209,760 19,520 58,560 761,085 
PARSU12/6/201920,500 41,000 82,000 1,598,590 
Christoph Schell
Annual Incentive
RSU12/7/202172,942 2,720,007 
PCSO12/7/2021193,719 37.292,075,376 
PARSU12/7/20217,023 14,045 42,135 998,060 
PARSU12/7/202011,535 23,069 69,207 899,460 
PARSU12/6/201926,195 52,389 104,778 2,042,647 
(1)Amounts represent the range of possible cash payouts for fiscal 2022 annual incentive awards under the Stock Incentive Plan based upon annual salary. Mr. Schell left the company on March 11, 2022 and was therefore not eligible for the fiscal 2022 annual incentive award.
(2)For the fiscal 2020, 2021 and 2022 PARSUs, amounts represent the range of shares that may be released at the end of the three-year vesting period applicable to the PARSUs assuming achievement of threshold, target, or maximum performance. For the 2022 PARSUs year 1, 2021 PARSUs year 2, and 2020 PARSUs year 3, fiscal 2022 EPS units are reflected in this table, including the grant date fair value of the market related TSR goal modifier of the 2022 PARSUs, for which expense recognition is not subject to probable or maximum outcome assumptions. If our average three-year performance for EPS, and modified by relative TSR performance, as applicable, are below threshold for the performance period, no shares will be released based on program description. For additional details, see the discussion of PARSUs under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Fiscal 2022 Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation—Awards from Fiscal 2022—2022 PARSUs.”
(1)Amounts represent the range of possible cash payouts for fiscal 2019 PfR incentive awards, under the Stock Incentive Plan based upon annual salary.

Proxy Statement63


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

(2)

PARSU amounts represent the range of shares that may be released at the end of the two- and three-year vesting periods applicable to the PARSUs assuming achievement of threshold, target, or maximum performance. 50% of the PARSUs are eligible for vesting based on EPS performance and 50% are eligible for vesting based on relative TSR performance. PARSUs vest as follows: 16.6% of the units are eligible for vesting based on EPS performance of year one with continued service over two years, 16.6% of the units are eligible for vesting based on EPS performance of year two with continued service over three years, 16.6% of the units are eligible for vesting based on EPS performance of year three with continued service over three years, 25% of the units are eligible for vesting based on TSR performance over two years with continued service over two years, 25% of the units are eligible for vesting based on relative TSR performance over three years with continued service over three years. 2019 PARSU year 1 EPS units and all relative TSR units are reflected in this table. Further, the 2018 PARSU – fiscal 2019 EPS units and the 2017 PARSU – fiscal 2019 EPS units are also included. If our EPS and relative TSR performance are below threshold for the performance period, no shares will be released for the applicable segment. For additional details, see the discussion of PARSUs under the heading“Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Fiscal 2019 Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation—2019 PARSUs.”

(3)2023 PROXY STATEMENTRSUs vest as to one-third of the units on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service.67


Executive Compensation
(3)RSUs vest as to one-third of the units on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service.
(4)PCSOs will vest as follows: (i) one-third of the PCSO award will vest upon continued service of one year and achievement of a closing stock price that is at least 10% over the grant date stock price for at least 20 consecutive trading days within two years from the date of grant; (ii) one-third will vest upon continued service for two years and achievement of a closing stock price that is at least 20% over the grant date stock price for at least 20 consecutive trading days within four years from the date of grant; and (iii) one-third will vest upon continued service of three years and achievement of a closing stock price that is at least 30% over the grant date stock price for at least 20 consecutive trading days within five years from the date of grant. For additional details, see the discussion of PARSUs under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Fiscal 2022 Executive Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation—Awards from Fiscal 2022—2022 PCSOs.”
Outstanding Equity Awards at 20192022 Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information on stock and option awards held by the NEOs as of October 31, 2019:

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price(1)
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date(2)
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(3)
(#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(4)
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(5)
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(4)
($)
Dion J. Weisler369,02017.2912/9/2022701,98612,193,497137,8272,394,055
525,71913.8311/1/2023
Steven J. Fieler350,1916,082,81830,913536,959
Enrique J. Lores156,97612.4710/29/2023260,2154,519,93552,783916,841
Kim M. Rivera203,5433,535,54242,725742,133
Alex Cho9,56617.2912/9/2022179,8873,124,63730,913536,959
48,81213.8311/1/2023
2022:
Option AwardsStock Awards
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
Option
Exercise
Price
(4)
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
(5)
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
(6)
(#)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(7)
($)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested
(8)
(#)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
(7)
($)
Enrique J.
Lores
156,976 12.4710/29/2023363,825 10,048,849 305,543 8,439,098 
212,486 424,974 (2)23.6812/6/2030
498,543 37.2912/6/2031
Marie Myers62,959 125,918 (3)23.6812/6/2030172,576 4,766,550 91,063 2,515,160 
162,382 37.2912/6/2031
Julie Jacobs— — — — — 347,625 9,601,403 — — 
Alex Cho86,568 173,138 (3)23.6812/6/2030163,401 4,513,135 123,055 3,398,779 
163,807 37.2912/6/2031
Tuan Tran86,568 173,138 (2)23.6812/6/2030161,259 4,453,963 123,055 3,398,779 
163,807 37.2912/6/2031
Christoph
Schell
(1)
— — — — — — — — — 
(1)Mr. Schell left the company on March 11, 2022 and all of his outstanding equity awards were forfeited when he departed the company.
(2)The option award held by Mr. Lores and Mr. Tran fully vests as to one-third of the options on the second and third anniversary of December 7, 2020, the date of grant. The option award would continue to vest in accordance with this schedule in the event Mr. Lores or Mr. Tran retires from HP. Mr. Lores and Mr. Tran are both retirement-eligible.
(3)The performance hurdles applicable to these option awards were achieved by the end of fiscal 2022. Such option awards vest as to one-third of the options on the second and third anniversary of December 7, 2020, the date of grant.
(4)Option exercise prices are the fair market value of our stock on the grant date. In connection with the 2015 separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and in accordance with the employee matters agreement, HP made certain adjustments to the exercise price and number of stock-based compensation awards with the intention of preserving the intrinsic value of the awards prior to the separation. Exercisable and non-exercisable stock options were converted to similar awards of the entity where the employee was working post-separation.
(5)All options have a ten-year term, except for the 156,976 stock options granted to Mr. Lores, which have an eight-year term.
(6)The amounts in this column include shares underlying dividend equivalent units credited with respect to outstanding stock awards through October 31, 2022. The release dates and release amounts for all unvested stock awards are as follows, assuming continued service and satisfaction of any applicable financial performance conditions:
Mr. Lores: December 7, 2022 (187,784 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2023 (116,239 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2024 (40,226 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares).
Ms. Myers: December 7, 2022 (42,903 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); February 17, 2023 (12,684 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); March 30, 2023 (32,698 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2023 (42,904 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); February 17, 2024 (12,684 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares)); December 7, 2024 (20,381 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares).
Ms. Jacobs: October 3, 2023 (115,875 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); October 3, 2024 (115,875 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); October 3, 2025 (115,875 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares).
Mr. Cho: December 7, 2022 (82,747 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2023 (51,529 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2024 (20,560 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares).
Mr. Tran: December 7, 2022 (80,796 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2023 (51,529 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2024 (20,560 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares).
(7)Value calculated based on the $27.62 closing price of our stock on October 31, 2022.
(8)The amounts in this column include the amounts of PARSUs granted in fiscal 2021 (Year 1 and Year 2 EPS units) and fiscal 2022 (Year 1 EPS units). The EPS units for PARSUs granted in fiscal 2021 and 2022 are reported based on maximum (300%) and threshold (50%) performance, respectively. Actual payout will be based on achievement of performance goals at the end of the three-year vesting period.
(1)Option exercise prices are the fair market value of our stock on the grant date. In connection with the separation of HPE and in accordance with the employee matters agreement, HP made certain adjustments to the exercise price and number of stock-based compensation awards with the intention of preserving the intrinsic value of the awards prior to the separation. Exercisable and non-exercisable stock options were converted to similar awards of the entity where the employee was working post-separation. RSUs and performance-contingent awards were adjusted to provide holders with RSUs and performance-contingent awards in the Company that employs such employee following the separation.
(2)68All options have an eight-year term.
logo_hp.jpg 

(3)The amounts in this column include shares underlying dividend equivalent units credited with respect to outstanding stock awards through October 31, 2019. The amounts also include PARSUs granted in fiscal 2018 (Year 2 EPS units) and fiscal 2019 (Year 1 EPS units) plus accrued dividend equivalent shares. The 2018 PARSUs Year 2 EPS units and 2019 PARSUs Year 1 EPS units are reported based on actual performance since those results have been certified (fiscal 2019 EPS period). The release dates and release amounts for all unvested stock awards are as follows, assuming continued service and satisfaction of any applicable financial performance conditions:
Mr. Weisler: December 7, 2019 (269,223 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2020 (170,152 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2021 (84,315 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares). The number of PARSUs and dividend equivalent shares, as described above, that will be paid out at the end of the two- and three-year vesting periods is 151,874.Executive Compensation
Mr. Fieler: December 7, 2019 (35,181 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); January 3, 2020 (168,351 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); January 11, 2020 (15,618 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); July 1, 2020 (11,753 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2020 (35,181 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); July 1, 2021 (11,753 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2021 (23,260 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares). The number of PARSUs and dividend equivalent shares, as described above, that will be paid out at the end of the two- and three-year vesting periods is 30,267.
Mr. Lores: December 7, 2019 (95,604 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2020 (64,646 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2021 (32,854 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares). The number of PARSUs and dividend equivalent shares, as described above, that will be paid out at the end of the two- and three-year vesting periods is 57,668.
Ms. Rivera: December 7, 2019 (72,760 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2020 (50,057 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2021 (29,074 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares). The number of PARSUs and dividend equivalent shares, as described above, that will be paid out at the end of the two- and three-year vesting periods is 44,511.
Mr. Cho: December 7, 2019 (57,968 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); July 1, 2020 (11,753 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2020 (38,360 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); July 1, 2021 (11,753 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares); December 7, 2021 (23,260 shares plus accrued dividend equivalent shares). The number of PARSUs and dividend equivalent shares, as described above, that will be paid out at the end of the two- and three-year vesting periods is 30,267.
(4)Value calculated based on the $17.37 closing price of our stock on October 31, 2019.
(5)The amounts in this column include the amounts of PARSUs granted in fiscal 2018 (50% of TSR units) and fiscal 2019 (all TSR units) plus accrued dividend equivalent shares. The TSR units are reported based on threshold performance. Actual payout will be on achievement of performance goals at the end of the two- and three-year vesting periods.

64www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2019

2022

The following table provides information about options exercised and stock awards vested for the NEOs during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019:

Option AwardsStock Awards(1)
Name     Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
     Value
Realized
on
Exercise
($)
     Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
     Value Realized
on Vesting(2)
($)
Dion J. Weisler942,71219,492,224
Steven J. Fieler233,7444,688,198
Enrique J. Lores250,2584,943,981
Kim M. Rivera264,9315,690,415
Alex Cho83,2971,809,716
(1)Includes PARSUs, RSUs, and accrued dividend equivalent shares.
(2)Represents the amounts realized based on the fair market value of our stock on the performance period end date for PARSUs (October 31, 2019) and on the vesting date for RSUs and accrued dividend equivalent shares. Fair market value is determined based on the closing price of our stock on the applicable performance period end/vesting date.

2022:

Option Awards
Stock Awards(1)
NameNumber of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized on
Exercise
(2)
($)
Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting
(3)
($)
Enrique J. Lores608,95818,661,826
Marie Myers70,5832,674,093
Julie Jacobs
Alex Cho273,2758,424,799
Tuan Tran248,5977,614,910
Christoph Schell109,4544,081,540
(1)Includes PARSUs, RSUs, and accrued dividend equivalent shares.
(2)Represents the amounts realized based on the difference between the market price of HP stock on the date of grant and the exercise price.
(3)Represents the amounts realized based on the fair market value of our stock on the performance period end date for PARSUs (October 31, 2022) and on the vesting date for RSUs and accrued dividend equivalent shares. Fair market value is determined based on the closing price of our stock on the applicable performance period end/ vesting date.
Fiscal 20192022 Pension Benefits Table

The following table provides information about the present value of accumulated pension benefits payable to each NEO:

Name     Plan
Name(1)
     Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
(#)
     Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(2)
($)
     Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
Dion J. Weisler(3)
Steven J. FielerCAPP1.3        $9,955
Enrique J. Lores(3)
Kim Rivera(3)
Alex ChoRP7.691,020
EBP7.612
IRG24.3138,518
(1)The “RP” and the “EBP” are the qualified HP Retirement Plan and the non-qualified HP Excess Benefit Plan, respectively. “CAPP” is the qualified Cash Account Pension Plan. All benefits are frozen under these plans. The RP and CAPP have
Name
Plan
Name
(1)
Number
of Years of
Credited
Service
(#)
Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit
(2)
($)
Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year
($)
Enrique J. Lores(3)
Marie Myers(4)
Julie Jacobs(3)
Alex ChoRP7.656,846
EBP7.67
IRG27.398,991
Tuan TranRP14.6234,196
EBP14.6141,552
Christoph Schell(3)
(1)The “RP” and the “EBP” are the qualified HP Retirement Plan and the non-qualified HP Excess Benefit Plan, respectively. All benefits are frozen under these plans. The RP has been merged into the HP Inc. Pension Plan (formerly known as the Hewlett-Packard Company Retirement Plan). The “IRG” is the International Retirement Guarantee which is a nonqualified plan covering certain highly compensated international transfers.
(2)The present value of accumulated benefits is shown at the age 65 unreduced retirement age for the RP, the EBP and the IRG using the assumptions under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 715-30 Defined Benefit Plans—Pension for the 2022 fiscal year-end measurement (as of October 31, 2022). The present value is based on a discount rate of 5.70% for the RP, 5.35% for the EBP and 5.32% for the IRG, lump sum interest rates of 5.25% for the first five years, 5.85% for the next 15 years and 5.85% thereafter, and applicable mortality for lump sums with the respective mortality improvement scale applied for future years. As of October 31, 2021 (the prior measurement date), the ASC Topic 715-30 assumptions included a discount rate of 2.91% for the RP, 1.64% for the EBP, and 1.57% for the IRG, lump sum interest rates of 0.70% for the first five years, 2.55% for the next 15 years and 3.06% thereafter, and applicable mortality for lump sums with the respective mortality improvement scale applied for future years.
(3)Mr. Lores, Ms. Jacobs and Mr. Schell are not eligible to receive benefits under any defined benefit pension plan because we ceased benefit accruals under all of our U.S.-qualified defined benefit pension plans prior to the commencement of their employment with HP in the United States.
(4)Ms. Myers was a participant in the RP and EBP, but when she previously left the Company, she was paid her RP and EBP benefits in fiscal 2019.
(2)2023 PROXY STATEMENTThe present value of accumulated benefits is shown at the age 65 unreduced retirement age for the RP, the EBP and the IRG, and the immediate unreduced benefit from the CAPP using the assumptions under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 715-30 Defined Benefit Plans—Pension for the 2019 fiscal year-end measurement (as of October 31, 2019). The present value is based on a discount rate of 3.21% for the RP (this discount rate also applies for CAPP but since the benefit is currently unreduced, there is no discounting applied), 2.39% for the EBP and 2.50% for the IRG, lump sum interest rates of 2.13% for the first five years, 3.07% for the next 15 years and 3.65% thereafter, and applicable mortality for lump sums with the respective mortality improvement scale applied for future years. As of October 31, 2018 (the prior measurement date), the ASC Topic 715-30 assumptions included a discount rate of 4.54% for the RP, 4.02% for the EBP, and 4.07% for the IRG, lump sum interest rates of 3.21% for the first five years, 4.26% for the next 15 years and 4.55% thereafter, and applicable mortality for lump sums with the respective mortality improvement scale applied for future years.69

(3)Executive CompensationMr. Weisler, Mr. Lores and Ms. Rivera are not eligible to receive benefits under any defined benefit pension plan because we ceased benefit accruals under all of our U.S.-qualified defined benefit pension plans prior to the commencement of their employment with HP in the United States.

Narrative to the Fiscal 20192022 Pension Benefits Table

No NEO currently accrues a benefit under any qualified or non-qualified defined benefit pension plan because we ceased benefit accruals in all our U.S.-qualified defined benefit pension plans (and their non-qualified plan counterparts) in prior years. In the case of Mr. Cho, his IRG benefit is based on the US retirement program and since the US pension plans are frozen there is no accrual under that plan. Benefits previously accrued by Mr. Fieler under CAPP and those accrued by Mr. Cho under the RP, EBP and IRG and by Mr. Tran under the RP and EBP are payable to them following termination of employment, subject to the terms of the applicable plans.

Proxy Statement65


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Terms of the HP Retirement Plan (RP)

Mr. Cho and Mr. Tran earned benefits under the RP and the EBP based on pay and service prior to 2006. The RP is a traditional defined benefit plan that provided a benefit based on years of service and the participant’s “highest average pay rate,” reduced by a portion of Social Security earnings. “Highest average pay rate” was determined based on the 20 consecutive fiscal quarters when pay was the highest. Pay for this purpose included base pay and bonus, subject to applicable IRS limits. Benefits under the RP may be taken in one of several different annuity forms or in an actuarially equivalent lump sum. Since Mr. Cho becameTran was a participant in the RP afterbefore November 1, 1993 so he has noa DPSP balance which is integrated with the RP. Benefits calculated under the RP are offset by the value of benefits earned under the HP Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (DPSP) balance to be integrated with(the “DPSP”) before November 1, 1993. Together, the RP.

RP and the DPSP constitute a “floor-offset” arrangement for periods before November 1, 1993. Benefits not payable from the RP and the DPSP due to IRS limits are paid from the EBP under which benefits are unfunded and unsecured. When an EBP participant terminates employment, the benefit liability is transferred to the EDCP, where an account is established for the participant. That account is then credited with relativelyhypothetical investment earnings (gains or losses) based upon the investment election made by participants from among investment options similar to those offered under the HP 401(k) Plan. There is no formula that would result in above-market earnings or payment of a preferential interest rate on this benefit. At the time of distribution, amounts representing EBP benefits are paid from the EDCP in a lump sum or installment form, according to pre-existing elections made by those participants, except that participants with a small benefits terminates theybenefit or who have not qualified for retirement status (generally, age 55 or older with at least 15 years of continuous service since the last hire date; but for deferrals made during 2023 and in future years, age 55 or older with attainment of at least 70 points (with points generally defined as the sum of the participant’s age plus total years of service)) are paid their EBP benefit in January of the year following their termination, subject to any delay required by Section 409A of the Code.

Terms of

Since Mr. Cho became a participant in the Cash Account PensionRP after November 1, 1993, he has no Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan (CAPP)
Mr. Fieler earned benefits under the CAPP based on his compensation beginning in September 2004 through the end of 2005 when benefits were frozen. While interest continues(DPSP) balance to accrue on the CAPP balance, no pay credits have been applied since the end of 2005. CAPP provided for 4% of pay credits to a cash balance account with interest credited at a 1-year Treasury bill plus 1% interest rate. The CAPP balance can be paid as a lump sumintegrated with the appropriate election and spousal consent if married or can be converted to annuity forms of payment.

RP.

Terms of the International Retirement Guarantee (IRG)
Employees who transferred internationally at the Company’s request prior to 2000 were put into an international umbrella plan. This plan determines the country of guarantee which is generally the country in which an employee has spent the longest portion of his HP Inc. career. For Mr. Cho, the country of guarantee is currently the U.S. The IRG determines the present value of a full career benefit for Mr. Cho under the HP Inc. sponsored retirement benefit plans that applied to employees working in the U.S., and U.S. Social Security (since the U.S. is his country of guarantee) then offsets the present value of the retirement benefits from plans and social insurance systems in the countries in which he earned retirement benefits (France and the US) for his total period of HP Inc. employment. The net benefit value is payable as a single lump sum amount as soon as practicable after termination or retirement, subject to any delay required by Section 409A of the Code. This is a nonqualified retirement plan.

Fiscal 20192022 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table provides information about contributions, earnings, withdrawals, distributions, and balances under the EDCP:

Name     Executive
Contributions
in Last FY(1)
($)
     Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY(1)(2)
($)
     Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)
     Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions(3)
($)
     Aggregate
Balance at
FYE(4)
($)
Dion J. Weisler10,80010,8003,85479,705
Steven J. Fieler1,82918,672
Enrique J. Lores595,86611,000186,1312,189,074
Kim M. Rivera2,81028,313
Alex Cho10,3204,9202,69835,985
(1)
Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
(1)
($)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
(1)(2)
($)
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
(3)
($)
Aggregate
Balance at
FYE
(4)
($)
Enrique J. Lores1,128,00011,600(966,389)50,7394,989,820
Marie Myers22,00011,600(44,343)341,935
Julie Jacobs
Alex Cho12,50011,600(15,886)94,462
Tuan Tran1,564,57310,925(804,071)3,182,626
Christoph Schell4,52511,400(19,302)98,913
(1)The amounts reported here as “Executive Contributions” and “Registrant Contributions” are reported as compensation to such NEO in the “Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns in the “Summary Compensation Table” above.
(2)The contributions reported here as “Registrant Contributions” were made in fiscal 2022 with respect to calendar year 2021 participant base pay deferrals. During fiscal 2022, the NEOs were eligible to receive a 4% matching contribution on base pay deferrals that exceeded the IRS limit that applies to the qualified HP 401(k) Plan up to a maximum of two times that limit.
(3)The distributions reported here were made pursuant to participant elections made prior to the time that the amounts were deferred in accordance with plan rules.
(4)Of these balances, the following amount was reported as compensation to such NEO in the Summary Compensation Table in prior proxy statements: Mr. Lores $3,050,660, Ms. Myers $289,401, Ms. Jacobs $0, Mr. Cho $61,140, Mr. Tran $918,402, and Mr. Schell $45,368. The information reported in this footnote is provided to clarify the extent to which amounts payable as deferred compensation represent compensation reported in our prior proxy statements, rather than additional earned compensation. Mr. Schell’s balance was paid to him in January 2023, in accordance with plan guidelines and his prior elections.
(2)70The contributions reported here as “Registrant Contributions” were made in fiscal 2019 with respect to calendar year 2018 participant base pay deferrals. During fiscal 2019, the NEOs were eligible to receive a 4% matching contribution on base pay deferrals that exceeded the IRS limit that applies to the qualified HP 401(k) Plan up to a maximum of two times that limit.
logo_hp.jpg 

(3)The distributions reported here were made pursuant to participant elections made prior to the time that the amounts were deferred in accordance with plan rules.Executive Compensation
(4)Of these balances, the following amount was reported as compensation to such NEO in the Summary Compensation Table in prior proxy statements: Mr. Weisler $52,258, Mr. Lores $644,811, Ms. Rivera $8,840, Mr. Fieler $9,932, and Mr. Cho $0. The information reported in this footnote is provided to clarify the extent to which amounts payable as deferred compensation represent compensation reported in our prior proxy statements, rather than additional earned compensation.

66www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Narrative to the Fiscal 2019 Non-qualified2022 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

HP sponsors the EDCP, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that permits eligible U.S. employees to defer base pay in excess of the amount taken into account under the qualified HP 401(k) Plan and bonus amounts of up to 95% of the annual PfR incentive bonus payable under the annual PfR incentive plan. In addition, a matching contribution is available under the plan to eligible employees. The matching contribution applies to base pay deferrals on compensation above the IRS limit that applies to the qualified HP 401(k) Plan, up to a maximum of two times that compensation limit (matching contributions made in fiscal year 20192022 pertained to base pay from $275,000$290,000 to $550,000$580,000 during calendar year 2018)2021). During fiscal 2019,2022, the NEOs were eligible for a matching contribution of up to 4% on base pay contributions in excess of the IRS limit, up to a maximum of two times that limit.

Upon becoming eligible for participation or during the annual enrollment period, employees must specify the amount of base pay and/or the percentage of bonus to be deferred, as well as the time and form of payment. If termination of employment occurs before retirement (defined as at least age 55 with 15 years of continuous service), distribution is made in the form of a lump sum in January of the year following the year of termination, subject to any delay required under Section 409A of the Code. At retirement (or earlier, if properly elected), benefits are paid according to the distribution election made by the participant at the time of the deferral election, subject to any delay required under Section 409A of the Code. As of the end of fiscal 2022, Mr. Lores and Mr. Tran were the only NEOs who were retirement eligible. In the event of death, the remaining vested EDCP account balance will be paid to the designated beneficiary, or otherwise in accordance with the EDCP provisions, in a single lump-sum payment in the month following the month of death.

Amounts deferred or credited under the EDCP are credited with hypothetical investment earnings based on participant investment elections made from among the investment options available under the HP 401(k) Plan. Accounts maintained for participants under the EDCP are not held in trust, and all such accounts are subject to the claims of general creditors of HP. No amounts are credited with above-market earnings.

Proxy Statement67
2023 PROXY STATEMENT71


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The amounts in the following table estimate potential payments due if a NEO had terminated employment with HP effective October 31, 20192022 under each of the circumstances specified below. These amounts are in addition to benefits generally available to U.S. employees upon termination of employment, such as distributions from the retirement plans and the HP 401(k) Plan and payment of accrued vacation where required.

Long Term Incentive Programs(3)
NameTermination ScenarioTotal(1)Severance(2)Stock
Options
Restricted
Stock
PARSU
Dion J. Weisler     Voluntary/For Cause     $0     $0     $0     $0     $0
Disability$20,173,559$0$0$9,555,432$10,618,127
Retirement$0$0$0$0$0
Death$20,173,559$0$0$9,555,432$10,618,127
Not for Cause$20,357,645$10,743,471$0$4,565,618$5,048,556
Change in Control$30,917,030$10,743,471$0$9,555,432$10,618,127
Steven J. FielerVoluntary/For Cause$0$0$0$0$0
Disability$7,872,629$0$0$5,557,079$2,315,550
Retirement$0$0$0$0$0
Death$7,872,629$0$0$5,557,079$2,315,550
Not for Cause$6,944,192$2,375,340$0$3,542,785$1,026,067
Change in Control$10,247,969$2,375,340$0$5,557,079$2,315,550
Enrique J. LoresVoluntary/For Cause$0$0$0$0$0
Disability$7,575,972$0$0$3,518,240$4,057,732
Retirement$0$0$0$0$0
Death$7,575,972$0$0$3,518,240$4,057,732
Not for Cause$6,522,615$2,984,787$0$1,618,241$1,919,587
Change in Control$10,560,759$2,984,787$0$3,518,240$4,057,732
Kim M. RiveraVoluntary/For Cause$0$0$0$0$0
Disability$6,009,261$0$0$2,762,376$3,246,885
Retirement$0$0$0$0$0
Death$6,009,261$0$0$2,762,376$3,246,885
Not for Cause$5,620,679$2,898,601$0$1,228,911$1,493,167
Change in Control$8,907,862$2,898,601$0$2,762,376$3,246,885
Alex ChoVoluntary/For Cause$0$0$0$0$0
Disability$4,914,434$0$0$2,598,884$2,315,550
Retirement$0$0$0$0$0
Death$4,914,434$0$0$2,598,884$2,315,550
Not for Cause$4,413,889$2,335,895$0$1,051,927$1,026,067
Change in Control$7,250,329$2,335,895$0$2,598,884$2,315,550
Long Term Incentive Programs(4)
Name(1)
Termination
Scenario
Total(2)
Severance(3)
Stock
Options
Restricted
Stock
PARSU
Enrique J. LoresVoluntary$17,132,817 $— $1,674,398 $10,048,849 $5,409,570 
Disability$21,335,145 $— $1,674,398 $10,048,849 $9,611,898 
Retirement$17,132,817 $— $1,674,398 $10,048,849 $5,409,570 
Death$21,335,145 $— $1,674,398 $10,048,849 $9,611,898 
Not for Cause$25,761,992 $8,629,175 $1,674,398 $10,048,849 $5,409,570 
Change in Control$29,964,320 $8,629,175 $1,674,398 $10,048,849 $9,611,898 
Marie MyersVoluntary/For Cause$— $— $— $— $— 
Disability$8,198,756 $— $496,117 $4,766,550 $2,936,089 
Retirement$— $— $— $— $— 
Death$8,198,756 $— $496,117 $4,766,550 $2,936,089 
Not for Cause$6,717,123 $2,779,259 $227,389 $2,078,243 $1,632,232 
Change in Control$10,978,015 $2,779,259 $496,117 $4,766,550 $2,936,089 
Julie JacobsVoluntary/For Cause$— $— $— $— $— 
Disability$9,601,403 $— $— $9,601,403 $— 
Retirement$— $— $— $— $— 
Death$9,601,403 $— $— $9,601,403 $— 
Not for Cause$2,398,135 $2,131,409 $— $266,726 $— 
Change in Control$11,732,812 $2,131,409 $— $9,601,403 $— 
Alex ChoVoluntary/For Cause$— $— $— $— $— 
Disability$8,875,139 $— $682,164 $4,513,135 $3,679,840 
Retirement$— $— $— $— $— 
Death$8,875,139 $— $682,164 $4,513,135 $3,679,840 
Not for Cause$7,840,063 $3,156,283 $312,663 $2,245,896 $2,125,221 
Change in Control$12,031,422 $3,156,283 $682,164 $4,513,135 $3,679,840 
Tuan TranVoluntary$7,261,348 $— $682,164 $4,453,963 $2,125,221 
Disability$8,815,967 $— $682,164 $4,453,963 $3,679,840 
Retirement$7,261,348 $— $682,164 $4,453,963 $2,125,221 
Death$8,815,967 $— $682,164 $4,453,963 $3,679,840 
Not for Cause$10,158,018 $2,896,670 $682,164 $4,453,963 $2,125,221 
Change in Control$11,712,637 $2,896,670 $682,164 $4,453,963 $3,679,840 
(1)Mr. Schell resigned from the company on March 11, 2022 and did not receive any payments or benefits in connection therewith. Accordingly, pursuant to Instruction 4 of Item 402(j), Mr. Schell is not included in this table.
(2)Total does not include amounts earned or benefits accumulated due to continued service by the NEO through October 31, 2022, including vested stock options, PCSOs, RSUs, PARSUs, accrued retirement benefits, and vested balances in the EDCP, as those amounts are detailed in the preceding tables.
(3)The amounts reported are the cash benefits payable in the event of a qualifying termination under the SPEO: for CEO, 2x multiple of base pay plus either the average of the actual annual incentives paid for the preceding three years, or target bonus if less than three full years at the level by the end of the fiscal year; for other NEOs, 1.5x multiple of base pay plus either the average of the actual annual incentives paid for the preceding three years, or target bonus if less than three full years at the level by the end of the fiscal year; and includes 18 months’ COBRA premiums for continued group medical coverage for the NEOs and their eligible dependents. In addition, each NEO would be eligible to receive a pro-rata cash bonus based on actual performance (in the event of a qualifying termination outside of the context of a change in control) or based on target performance (in the event of a qualifying termination within 24 months of a change in control); such amounts have not been included in this column.
(4)Upon an involuntary termination not for cause, covered executives receive pro-rata vesting on unvested equity awards as discussed under the heading “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Termination and Change in Control Protections—Severance and Long-term Incentive Change in Control Plan for Executive Officers.” Full vesting of PARSUs based on performance at target levels (to the extent that the actual performance period has not been completed) applies in the event of a termination due to death or disability for all grant recipients. Pro-rata vesting of PARSUs based on actual performance applies in the event of a termination due to retirement for all grant recipients. To calculate the value of unvested PARSUs for purposes of this table, target performance is used unless the performance period has been completed and the results have been recorded as of October 31, 2022. No TSR modifier was applied to such values. Full vesting of unvested PCSOs applies in the event of a termination due to death or disability for all grant recipients. With respect to the treatment of equity in the event of a change in control of HP, the information reported reflects the SPEO-approved change in control terms. As of the end of the fiscal 2022, only Mr. Lores and Mr. Tran are retirement eligible.
(1)Total does not include amounts earned or benefits accumulated due to continued service by the NEO through October 31, 2019, including vested stock options, PCSOs, RSUs, PARSUs, accrued retirement benefits, and vested balances in the EDCP, as those amounts are detailed in the preceding tables. Total also does not include amounts the NEO was eligible to receive under the annual PfR incentive with respect to fiscal 2019 performance.
(2)72The amounts reported are the cash benefits payable in the event of a qualifying termination under the SPEO: for CEO, 2x multiple of base pay plus the average of the actual annual incentives paid for the preceding three years; for other NEOs, 1.5x multiple of base pay plus the average of the actual annual incentives paid for the preceding three years, and includes 18 months’ COBRA premiums for continued group medical coverage for the NEOs and their eligible dependents.
logo_hp.jpg 

(3)Upon an involuntary termination not for cause, covered executives receive pro-rata vesting on unvested equity awards as discussed under the heading “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Severance and Long-term Incentive Change in Control Plan for Executive Officers.” Full vesting of PARSUs based on performance at target levels (to the extent that the actual performance period has not been completed) applies in the event of a termination due to death or disability for all grant recipients. Pro-rata vesting of PARSUs based on actual performance applies in the event of a termination due to retirement for all grant recipients. To calculate the value of unvested PARSUs for purposes of this table, target performance is used unless the performance period has been completed and the results have been certified. Full vesting of unvested PCSOs applies in the event of a termination due to death or disability for all grant recipients. PCSOs vest pro-rata in the event of a termination due to retirement. With respect to the treatment of equity in the event of a change in control of HP, the information reported reflects the SPEO approved change in control terms.Compensation

68www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Narrative to the Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table

HP Severance Plan for Executive Officers
An executive will be deemed to have incurred a qualifying termination for purposes of the SPEO if he or she is involuntarily terminated without cause and executes a full release of claims in a form satisfactory to HP promptly following termination. For purposes of the SPEO, “cause” means an executive’s material neglect (other than asconviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a resultfelony under federal law or the law of illness or disability) of his or her duties or responsibilities to HP or conduct (includingthe state in which such action oroccurred; executive’s willful and deliberate failure to act) that is not in the best interestperformance of the executive’s duties in any material respect; executive’s willful misconduct that results in material harm to HP; or is injurious to,a material violation of HP’s ethics and compliance program, code of conduct or other material policy of HP. The material terms of the SPEO are described under the heading “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Termination and Change in Control Protections—Severance and Long-term Incentive Change in Control Plan for Executive Officers.”

We have not entered into individual fixed-term employment agreements or any severance or change in control agreements with our current NEOs.

Voluntary or “For Cause” Termination
In general, an NEO who remained employed through October 31, 20192022 (the last day of the fiscal year) but voluntarily terminated employment immediately thereafter, or was terminated immediately thereafter in a “for cause” termination, would be eligible (1) to receive his or her annual incentive amount earned for fiscal 20192022 under the annual PfR incentive (subject to any discretionary downward adjustment or elimination by the HRC Committee prior to actual payment, and to any applicable clawback policy), (2) to exercise his or her vested stock options up to three months following a voluntary termination, and up to the date of termination in the case of termination “for cause,” (3) to receive a distribution of vested amounts deferred or credited under the EDCP, and (4) to receive a distribution of his or her vested benefits, if any, under the HP 401(k) and pension plans. An NEO who terminated employment before October 31, 2019,2022, either voluntarily or in a “for cause” termination, would generally not have been eligible to receive any amount under the annual PfR incentive with respect to the fiscal year in which the termination occurred, except that the HRC Committee has the discretion to make payment of prorated bonus amounts to individuals on leave of absence or in non-pay status, as well as in connection with certain voluntary severance incentives, workforce reductions, and similar programs.

“Not for Cause” Termination
A “not for cause” termination of an NEO who remained employed through October 31, 20192022 and was terminated immediately thereafter would qualify the NEO for the amounts described above under a “voluntary” termination in addition to benefits under the SPEO if the NEO signs the required release of claims in favor of HP.

In addition to the cash severance benefits and pro-rata equity awards payablevesting under the SPEO, the NEO would be eligible to exercise vested stock options up to one year after termination and receive distributions of vested, accrued benefits from HP deferred compensation and pension plans.

Termination Following a Change in Control
In the event of a change in control of HP, RSUs, stock options, and PCSOs will vest in full if the successor does not assume such awards or if an individual is terminated without Cause or terminates with Good Reason within 24 months of a change in control. OutstandingUnder each scenario, outstanding PARSUs and PCSOs will vest in full upon a termination in connection with or following a change in control, assuming target performance level. Upon failure of the successor to assume outstanding PARSUs in connection with a change in control, the PARSUs will vest in full based on the better of (i) pro-rata vesting at target, and (ii) 100% of units vesting based on actual performance with respect to awards for which the performance period has ended and target performance level with respect to awards for which the performance period has not ended (with vested PCSOs remaining exercisable for one year from the termination date), as determined by the HRC Committee within 30 days of change in control.

Death or Disability Terminations
An NEO who continued in employment through October 31, 20192022 whose employment is terminated immediately thereafter due to death or disability would be eligible (1) to receive his or her full annual incentive amount earned for fiscal 20192022 under the annual PfR incentive determined by HP in its sole discretion, (2) to receive a distribution of vested amounts deferred or credited under the EDCP, and (3) to receive a distribution of his or her vested benefits under the HP 401(k) and pension plans.

Upon termination due to death or disability, equity awards held by the NEO may vest in full. If termination is due to disability, RSUs, stock options, and PCSOs will vest in full, subject to satisfaction of applicable performance conditions, and, in the case of stock options and PCSOs, must be exercised within three years of termination or by the original expiration date, if earlier; all unvested portions of the PARSUs, including any amounts for dividend equivalent payments, shall vest based on performance at target levels. If termination is due to the NEO’s death, RSUs, stock options, and PCSOs will vest in full and, in the case of stock options and PCSOs, must be exercised within one year of termination or by the original expiration date, if earlier; all unvested portions of the PARSUs, including any amounts for dividend equivalent payments, shall vest based on performance at target levels.

Proxy Statement69


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

HP Severance Policy for Senior Executives

Under the HP Severance Policy for Senior Executives adopted by the Board in July 2003 (the “HP Severance Policy”), HP will seek stockholder approval for future severance agreements, if any, with certain senior executives that provide specified benefits in an amount exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s current annual base salary plus annual target cash bonus, in each case as in effect immediately prior to the time of such executive’s termination. Individuals subject to this policy consist of the Section 16 officers designated by the Board. In implementing this policy, the Board may elect to seek stockholder approval after the material terms of the relevant severance agreement are agreed upon.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT73

Executive Compensation
For purposes of determining the amounts subject to the HP Severance Policy, benefits subject to the limit generally include cash separation payments that directly relate to extraordinary benefits that are not available to groups of employees other than the Section 16 officers upon termination of employment. Benefits that have been earned or accrued, as well as prorated bonuses, accelerated stock or option vesting, and other benefits that are consistent with our practices applicable to employees other than the Section 16 officers, are not counted against the limit. Specifically, benefits subject to the HP Severance Policy include: (a) separation payments based on a multiplier of salary plus target bonus, or cash amounts payable for the uncompleted portion of employment agreements; (b) the value of any service period credited to a Section 16 officer in excess of the period of service actually provided by such Section 16 officer for purposes of any employee benefit plan; (c) the value of benefits and perquisites that are inconsistent with our practices applicable to one or more groups of employees in addition to, or other than, the Section 16 officers (“Company Practices”); and (d) the value of any accelerated vesting of any stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, or long-term cash incentives that is inconsistent with Company Practices. The following benefits are not subject to the HP Severance Policy, either because they have been previously earned or accrued by the employee or because they are consistent with Company Practices: (i) compensation and benefits earned, accrued, deferred or otherwise provided for employment services rendered on or prior to the date of termination of employment pursuant to bonus, retirement, deferred compensation, or other benefit plans (e.g., 401(k) Plan distributions, payments pursuant to retirement plans, distributions under deferred compensation plans or payments for accrued benefits such as unused vacation days), and any amounts earned with respect to such compensation and benefits in accordance with the terms of the applicable plan; (ii) payments of prorated portions of bonuses or prorated long-term incentive payments that are consistent with Company Practices; (iii) acceleration of the vesting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs or long-term cash incentives that is consistent with Company Practices; (iv) payments or benefits required to be provided by law; and (v) benefits and perquisites provided in accordance with the terms of any benefit plan, program, or arrangement sponsored by HP or its affiliates that are consistent with Company Practices.

For purposes of the HP Severance Policy, future severance agreements include any severance agreements or employment agreements containing severance provisions that we may enter into after the adoption of the HP Severance Policy by the Board, as well as agreements renewing, modifying, or extending such agreements. Future severance agreements do not include retirement plans, deferred compensation plans, early retirement plans, workforce restructuring plans, retention plans in connection with extraordinary transactions, or similar plans or agreements entered into in connection with any of the foregoing, provided that such plans or agreements are applicable to one or more groups of employees in addition to the Section 16 officers.

HP Retirement Arrangements
Upon retirement immediately after October 31, 20192022 with a minimum age of 55 and years of combined age and service equal to or greater than 70, HP employees in the United States receive full vesting of time-based options (other than options granted under a retention agreement on or after June 25, 2019) granted under our stock plans with a post-termination exercise period of up to three years or the original expiration date, whichever comes first, as well as full vesting of RSUs (other than RSUs granted under a retention agreement on or after June 25, 2019). PCSOsAwards under the PCSO program, if any, will receive prorated vesting ifcontinue to vest and become exercisable once the stockshare price appreciation conditions are met and maytime component have been satisfied.
Such an individual will vest onat the same time as other participants with a prorated basis post-termination exercise period of up to five years or the end of the performance period, subject to stock price appreciation conditions and certain post-employment restrictions.original expiration date, whichever comes first. Awards under the PARSU program, if any, are paid on a prorated basis to participants at the end of the performance period based on actual results, and bonuses, if any, under the annual PfR incentive plan may be paid in prorated amounts at the discretion of management based on actual results. In accordance with Section 409A of the Code, certain amounts payable upon retirement (or other termination) of the NEOs and other key employees will not be paid out for at least six months following termination of employment.

As of the end of fiscal 2022, Mr. Lores and Mr. Tran were the only NEOs who were retirement eligible.

We sponsor two retiree medical programs in the United States, one of which provides subsidized coverage for eligible participants based on years of service. Eligibility for this program requires that participants have been continuously employed by HP since January 1, 2003 and have met other age and service requirements. None of the NEOs are eligible for this program.

70www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

The other U.S. retiree medical program we sponsor provides eligible retirees with access to coverage at group rates only, with no direct subsidy provided by HP. All the NEOs could be eligible for this program if they retire from HP on or after age 55 with at least ten years of qualifying service or if they retire at any age with combined age plus service equal to 80 or more years. In addition, beginning at age 45, eligible U.S. employees may participate in the HP Retirement Medical Savings Account Plan (the “RMSA”), under which certain participants are eligible to receive HP matching credits of up to $1,200 per year, up to a lifetime maximum of $12,000, which can be used to cover the cost of such retiree medical coverage (or other qualifying medical expenses) if the employee meets the eligibility requirements for HP retiree medical benefits. None of the NEOs are eligible forcurrently receiving the HP matching credits under the RMSA.

74
logo_hp.jpg 

Executive Compensation
Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of October 31, 2019.

Plan CategoryCommon shares
to be issued
upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(1)
(a)
Weighted-
average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(2)
(b)
Common shares
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by HP stockholders        36,472,053(3)     $15.4187           265,135,483(4) 
Equity compensation plans not approved by HP stockholders
Total36,472,053$15.4187265,135,483
(1)This column does not reflect awards of options and RSUs assumed in acquisitions where the plans governing the awards were not available for future awards as of October 31, 2019. As of October 31, 2019, there were no individual awards of options or RSUs outstanding pursuant to awards assumed in connection with acquisitions and granted under such plans.
(2)This column does not reflect the exercise price of shares underlying the assumed options referred to in footnote (1) to this table or the purchase price of shares to be purchased pursuant to the HP Inc. 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2011 ESPP”) or the legacy HP Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Legacy ESPP”). In addition, the weighted-average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding awards of RSUs and PARSUs, which have no exercise price.
(3)Includes awards of options and RSUs outstanding under the 2004 Plan and 2011 ESPP. Also includes awards of PARSUs representing 4,465,608 shares that may be issued under the 2004 Plan. Each PARSU award reflects a target number of shares that may be issued to the award recipient. HP determines the actual number of shares the recipient receives at the end of a three-year performance period based on results achieved compared with Company performance goals and stockholder return relative to the market. The actual number of shares that a grant recipient receives at the end of the period may range from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares.
(4)Includes (i) 184,508,645 shares available for future issuance under the 2004 Plan; (ii) 76,534,847 shares available for future issuance under the 2011 ESPP; (iii) 2,725,611 shares available for future issuances under the Legacy ESPP, a plan under which employee stock purchases are no longer made; and (iv) 1,366,380 shares are reserved for issuance under our Service Anniversary Stock Plan, a plan under which awards are no longer granted. Taking into account the enumerated unavailable shares from the Legacy ESPP and the Service Anniversary Stock Plan, a total of 265,135,483 shares were available for future grants as of October 31, 2019.

2022.

Plan Category
Common shares
to be issued
upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(1)
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(2)
(b)
Common shares
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by HP stockholders  34,469,722(3)$24.6610 172,921,923(4)
Equity compensation plans not approved by HP stockholders1,616,8961,342,234
Total34,086,618$24.6610 74,264,157
(1)This column does not reflect awards of options and RSUs assumed in acquisitions where the plans governing the awards were not available for future awards as of October 31, 2022. As of October 31, 2022, there were no individual awards of options or RSUs outstanding pursuant to awards assumed in connection with acquisitions and granted under such plans.
(2)This column does not reflect the exercise price of shares underlying the assumed options referred to in footnote (1) to this table or the purchase price of shares to be purchased pursuant to the HP Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2021 ESPP”) or the legacy HP Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Legacy ESPP”). In addition, the weighted-average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding awards of RSUs and PARSUs, which have no exercise price.
(3)Includes awards of options and RSUs outstanding under the 2004 Plan and the 2021 ESPP. Also includes awards of PARSUs representing 1,698,492 shares that may be issued under the 2004 Plan. Each PARSU award reflects a target number of shares that may be issued to the award recipient. HP determines the actual number of shares the recipient receives at the end of a three-year performance period based on results achieved compared with Company performance goals and stockholder return relative to the market. The actual number of shares that a grant recipient receives at the end of the period may range from 0% to 300% of the target number of shares.
(4)Includes (i) 120,417,249 shares available for future issuance under the 2004 Plan; (ii) 48,412,683 shares available for future issuance under the 2021 ESPP; (iii) 2,725,611 shares available for future issuances under the Legacy ESPP, a plan under which employee stock purchases are no longer made; (iv) 1,366,380 shares reserved for issuance under our Service Anniversary Stock Plan, a plan under which awards are no longer granted; and (v) 1,342,234 shares reserved for issuance under the Plantronics Inc. 2003 Stock Plan. Taking into account the enumerated unavailable shares from the Legacy ESPP and the Service Anniversary Stock Plan, a total of 174,264,157 shares were available for future grants as of October 31, 2022.
CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

In accordance with SEC rules we are reporting our CEO pay ratio.

As set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, our CEO’s annual total compensation for fiscal 20192022 was $19,317,972.$21,079,926. Our median employee’s annual total compensation was $75,013,$69,911, resulting in a CEO pay ratio of 258:302:1.

In calculating the CEO pay ratio, the SEC rules allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonable estimates and assumptions reflecting their unique employee populations. Therefore, our reported CEO pay ratio may not be comparable to CEO pay ratios reported by other companies due to differences in industries and geographical dispersion, as well as the different estimates, assumptions, and methodologies applied by other companies in calculating their CEO pay ratios.

Our CEO pay ratio is based on the following methodology:

We are using the same median employee for our fiscal 2019 pay ratio calculation as we used in fiscal 2018,
We are using the same median employee for our fiscal 2022 pay ratio calculation as we used in fiscal 2021, as there have been no changes in employee population or compensation arrangements, such as any mergers, spinoffs, or mass layoffs, that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change to our pay ratio disclosure. In accordance with SEC rules, in assessing changes in our employee population over the course of fiscal 2022, we excluded the approximately 7,000 employees that joined HP as a result of the recent Poly acquisition, which was completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022.
We calculated the median employee’s actual annual total compensation for fiscal 2022 using the same methodology that was used for our named executive officers, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
2023 PROXY STATEMENTWe calculated the median employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal 2019 using the same methodology that was used for our named executive officers, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.75


Proxy Statement71


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL NO. 4
Vote to Approve the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Executive Compensation
Our Board RecommendsFORthe approval of the Company’s 2021 Stock Purchase Plan
Board proposal no. 4
Advisory vote on the frequency of future “say on pay” votes
icon-check_blue2.jpg
The Board recommends a vote of “One Year” as the preferred frequency for future advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation.

On January 15, 2020,

Your Board is asking stockholders to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, on how frequently stockholders would like to cast an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. By voting on this proposal, you may indicate whether you would prefer an advisory vote on executive compensation once every one, two, or three years. Our prior say-on-frequency vote occurred in 2017. At that year’s meeting, stockholders agreed with the HRBoard’s recommendation that advisory votes on executive compensation should occur every year. Although this vote is non-binding, the Board and Compensationthe HRC Committee value the views of our stockholders and will review the voting results. However, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of HP and its stockholders to hold an advisory vote more or less frequently than the alternative that has been selected by stockholders.
After careful consideration of the frequency alternatives, and given the ongoing cadence of dialogue between HP and its stockholders on executive compensation matters, the Board adopted thebelieves that conducting an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation on an annual basis is currently appropriate for HP Inc. Company 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2021 ESPP”) and reserved 50,000,000 shares of HP common stock for issuance thereunder (subject to adjustments permitted under the 2021 ESPP). The 2021 ESPP will be effective May 1, 2021, subject to HP stockholder approval within 12 months of Board approval.

HP stockholders are being asked to approve the 2021 ESPP and the Board’s reservation of shares under the 2021 ESPP for the purpose of qualifying such shares for special tax treatment under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The 2021 ESPP is intended to replace HP’s 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2011 ESPP”), which will terminate on May 1, 2021, upon the effectiveness of the 2021 ESPP.

its stockholders.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of HP common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to be voted on the proposal at the annual meeting is required for advisory approval of this proposal.

Summary of the 2021 ESPP

The principal features of the 2021 ESPP are summarized below. The following summary of the 2021 ESPP does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the 2021 ESPP. It However, because this proposal has four choices, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2021 ESPP, which has been filed with the SEC as Annex A to this proxy statement. Any HP stockholder who wishes to obtain a copy of the 2021 ESPP may do so upon written request to the Secretary at HP’s principal executive offices.

General. The purpose of the 2021 ESPP is to provide employees of HP and its designated subsidiaries and affiliates withpossible that no choice will receive an opportunity to purchase HP common stock and, therefore, to have an additional incentive to contribute to the prosperity of HP.

Administration. The 2021 ESPP is administered by a committee (the “Administrative Committee”) appointed by the Board. The Administrative Committee has full power and authority to promulgate any rules and regulations which it deems necessary for the proper administration of the 2021 ESPP, to interpret the provisions and supervise the administration of the 2021 ESPP, to make factual determinations relevant to 2021 ESPP entitlements and to take all action in connection with administration of the 2021 ESPP as it deems necessary or advisable, consistent with the delegation from the Board. The decisions of the Board and the Administrative Committee are final and binding upon all participants.

Eligibility. Any employee of HP or any HP subsidiary or affiliate designated by the Administrative Committee who is regularly employed for at least 20 hours per week and more than five months in a calendar year on an Entry Date (as defined below) is eligible to participate in the 2021 ESPP during the Offering Period (as defined below) beginning on that Entry Date, subject to administrative rules established by the Administrative Committee. However, no employee is eligible to participate in the 2021 ESPP to the extent that, immediately after the grant, that employee would have owned 5% of either the voting power or the value of HP’s common stock. No employee may be granted an option to purchase HP’s common stock pursuant to the 2021 ESPP at a rate that exceeds $25,000 of the fair market value of such common stock per calendar year. Eligible employees become participants in the 2021 ESPP by filing with HP an enrollment agreement authorizing payroll deductions on a date set by the Administrative Committee prior to the applicable Entry Date. As of October 31, 2019, approximately 51,445 HP employees, including certain executive officers, were eligible to participate in the 2011 ESPP and such individuals are expected to be eligible to participate in the 2021 ESPP.

72www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Participation in an Offering. The 2021 ESPP is implemented by offering periods lasting for six months (an “Offering Period”). If stockholders approve the 2021 ESPP, the first six-month Offering Period will begin on May 1, 2021. Common stock is purchased under the 2021 ESPP every six months on the last trading day of each Offering Period (a “Purchase Date”), unless the participant becomes ineligible, withdraws or terminates employment earlier. The Entry Date is the first trading day of the Offering Period. To participate in the 2021 ESPP, each eligible employee must authorize contributions pursuant to the 2021 ESPP, which will generally be collected through payroll deductions. Such payroll deductions may not exceed 10%affirmative vote of a participant’s eligible compensation and are also subject to the limitations discussed above. A participant may increase or decrease his or her rate of contribution through payroll deductions at any time, but at no time may such rate of contribution exceed 10%. Each participant who has elected to participate is automatically granted an option on his or her Entry Date to purchase shares of common stock. The option is automatically exercised at the end of each Offering Period with the contributions accumulated during such Offering Period. The option expires upon the earlier to occurmajority of the Offering Period, the employee’s termination of employment, or upon the employee becoming ineligible. The number of shares that may be purchased by an employee in any Offering Period, subject to the limitations discussed above, may not exceed 5,000 shares of common stock.

Purchase Price; Shares Purchased. Shares of common stock may be purchased under the 2021 ESPP at a price not less than 95% of the fair market value of the common stock on the last trading day of the Offering Period; however, the Administrative Committee has the discretion to adjust the purchase price in the future so long as it is not less than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the last trading day of the Offering Period. The number of whole shares of HP common stock a participant purchasespresent in each Offering Period is determined by dividing the total amount of the participant’s contributions during that Offering Period by the purchase price, subject to the 5,000 share limit.

Termination of Employment. Termination of a participant’s employment for any reason, including death, immediately cancels his or her option and participation in the 2021 ESPP. In such event, the contributions credited to the participant’s account will be returned without interest to him or her or, in the case of death, to the person or personsrepresented by proxy and entitled to those contributions.

Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization, Merger or Sale of Assets. Inbe voted on this proposal. Therefore, the eventBoard will consider the choice that HP common stock is changed by reason of any stock split, stock dividend, combination or recapitalization, appropriate proportional adjustments may be made inreceives the highest number of shares of stock subject to the 2021 ESPP, the number of shares of stock to be purchased pursuant to an option and the price per share of common stock covered by an option. Any such adjustment will be made by the Board, whose determination shall be conclusive and binding. In the event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of HP or the merger or consolidation of HP with another company, the Board may determine that each option will be assumed by, or an equivalent option substituted by, the successor company or its affiliates, that the Purchase Date will be accelerated and that all outstanding options will be exercised on such date, or that all outstanding options will terminate and accumulated payroll deductions will be refunded.

Amendment and Termination of the Plan. The Board may terminate or amend the 2021 ESPP at any time, except that it may not increase the number of shares subject to the 2021 ESPP other than as described in the 2021 ESPP. The 2021 ESPP will continue until May 1, 2031, unless otherwise terminated by the Board.

Transferability. Options granted to employees may not be voluntarily or involuntarily assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise disposed of in any way, and any attempted assignment, transfer, pledge, or other disposition will be null and void and without effect.

Withdrawal. Generally, a participant may withdraw from the 2021 ESPP during an Offering Period prior to the change enrollment deadline established by the Administrative Committee. The Administrative Committee may establish rules limiting the frequency with which participants may withdraw and re-enroll in the plan and may establish a waiting period for participants wishing to re-enroll.

New Plan Benefits. Because benefits under the 2021 ESPP will depend on employees’ elections to participate and the fair market value of HP common stock at various future dates, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received by executive officers and other employees if the 2021 ESPP is approved by the stockholders. Non-employee Directors are not eligible to participate in the 2021 ESPP.

Proxy Statement73


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

If HP stockholders approve this proposal, the 2021 ESPP, and the right of participants to make purchases thereunder, should qualify under the provisions of Sections 421 and 423 of the Code. Under these provisions, no income will be taxable to a participant until the shares purchased under the 2021 ESPP are sold or otherwise disposed of. Upon sale or other disposition of the shares, the participant will generally be subject to tax and the amount of the tax will depend upon the holding period. If the shares are sold or otherwise disposed of more than two years from the applicable Entry Date and more than one year from the date of transfer of the shares to the participant, then the participant generally will recognize ordinary income measuredvotes as the lesserchoice supported by our stockholders.

76
logo_hp.jpg 

Ownership of (i) the excess of the amount received upon such sale or disposition over the purchase price, or (ii) an amount equal to 5% of the fair market value of the shares as of the Entry Date. Any additional gain should be treated as long-term capital gain. If the shares are sold or otherwise disposed of before the expiration of this holding period, the participant will recognize ordinary income generally measured as the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date the shares are purchased over the purchase price. Any additional gain or loss on such sale or disposition will be long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the holding period.HP is not entitled to a deduction for amounts taxed as ordinary income or capital gain to a participant except to the extent ordinary income is recognized by participants upon a sale or disposition of shares prior to the expiration of the holding period(s) described above. In all other cases, no deduction is allowed to HP.

The foregoing is only a summary of the effect of U.S. federal income taxation upon participants and HP with respect to the 2021 ESPP based on the U.S. Federal income tax laws in effect as of the date of this proxy statement. It is not intended to be exhaustive and does not discuss the tax consequences arising in the context of the employee’s death or the income tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign country in which the employee’s income or gain may be taxable or the gift, estate, or any tax law other than U.S. federal income tax law. Because individual circumstances may vary, HP advises all recipients to consult their own tax advisor concerning the tax implications of participation in the 2021 ESPP.

74www.hpannualmeeting.com


Our Stock

Table of Contents

Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 20192022 (or as of the date otherwise indicated below) concerning beneficial ownership by:

holders of more than 5% of HP’s outstanding shares of common stock;

our Directors and nominees;

each of the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 61; and

all of our Directors and executive officers as a group.

holders of more than 5% of HP’s outstanding shares of common stock;
our Directors and nominees;
each of the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 64; and
all of our Directors and executive officers as a group.
The information provided in the table is based on our records, information filed with the SEC and information provided to HP, except where otherwise noted.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each entity or individual is determined under SEC rules, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the entity or individual has sole or shared voting or investment power and also any shares that the entity or individual has the right to acquire as of March 1, 20202023 (60 days after December 31, 2019)2022) through the exercise of any stock options, through the vesting/settlement of RSUs payable in shares, or upon the exercise of other rights. Beneficial ownership excludes options or other rights vesting after March 1, 20202023 and any RSUs vesting/ settling, as applicable, on or before March 1, 20202023 that may be payable in cash or shares at HP’s election. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power (or shares such power with his or her spouse) with respect to the shares set forth in the following table.

Beneficial Ownership Table

Name of Beneficial Owner     Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
     Percent of Common
Stock Outstanding
Dodge & Cox(1)146,883,601                10.1%
BlackRock, Inc.(2)99,903,3616.9%
The Vanguard Group(3)129,732,1448.9%
Aida M. Alvarez50,698*
Shumeet Banerji31,311*
Robert R. Bennett71,091*
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh(4)150,382*
Stacy Brown-Philpot51,663*
Stephanie A. Burns63,233*
Mary Anne Citrino(5)197,682*
Richard L. Clemmer4,000*
Yoky Matsuoka17,138*
Stacey Mobley51,663*
Subra Suresh36,924*
Dion J. Weisler(6)1,767,869*
Alex Cho(7)88,582*
Steven J. Fieler(8)341,859*
Enrique J. Lores(9)540,626*
Kim M. Rivera203,223*
All current Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (20 persons)(10)4,555,175*
*Represents holdings of less than 1% based on shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019.

Proxy Statement75


Table of Contents

Ownership of Our Stock

(1)

Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2020 by Dodge & Cox. According to its Schedule 13G/A, Dodge & Cox reported having sole voting power over 140,708,785 shares, shared voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over 146,883,601 shares and shared dispositive power over no shares. The securities reported on the Schedule 13G/A are beneficially owned by clients of Dodge & Cox, which clients may include investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and other managed accounts, and which clients have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, and the proceeds from the sale of, HP’s stock. Dodge & Cox Stock Fund, an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, has an interest of 91,145,478 shares. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of January 31, 2020 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address of Dodge & Cox is 555 California Street, 40th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104.

(2)Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020 by BlackRock, Inc. According to its Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock, Inc. reported having sole voting power over 83,693,896 shares, shared voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over 99,903,361 shares and shared dispositive power over no shares. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of December 31, 2019 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
(3)Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed by the Vanguard Group on February 12, 2020. According to its Schedule 13G/A, the Vanguard Group reported having sole voting power over 2,199,101 shares, shared voting power over 460,709 shares, sole dispositive power over 127,188,851 shares, and shared dispositive power over 2,543,293 shares. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of December 31, 2019 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address for the Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(4)

Includes 146,148 shares that Mr. Bergh has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.

(5)Includes 159,671 shares that Ms. Citrino has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.
(6)Includes 894,739 shares that Mr. Weisler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.
(7)Includes 58,378 shares that Mr. Cho has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.
(8)

Includes 198,332 shares that Mr. Fieler has the right to acquire by settlement of Restricted Stock Units.

(9)Includes 156,976 shares that Mr. Lores has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.
(10)Includes 1,790,132 shares that current executive officers and Directors have the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 198,332 shares that current executive officers and Directors have the right to acquire by settlement of Restricted Stock Units.

76www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 1
Right to Act by
Written Consent
The Board recommends a vote AGAINSTthis proposal

Name of Beneficial OwnerShares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Percent of Common
Stock Outstanding
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.(1)
120,952,81812.3 %
The Vanguard Group(2)
93,653,4419.5 %
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
90,266,9859.2 %
Dodge & Cox(4)
52,451,2255.3 %
Aida M. Alvarez(5)
79,669*
Shumeet Banerji46,708*
Robert R. Bennett(6)
167,461*
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh(7)
156,244*
Bruce Broussard17,710*
Stacy Brown-Philpot(8)
84,735*
Stephanie A. Burns(9)
93,686*
Mary Anne Citrino(10)
209,741*
Richard L. Clemmer(11)
39,666*
Judith (“Jami”) Miscik12,941*
Kim K.W. Rucker(12)
7,876*
Subra Suresh57,666*
Alex Cho(13)
217,629*
Julie Jacobs— *
Enrique J. Lores(14)
1,420,217*
Marie Myers(15)
173,936*
Christoph Schell99,637*
Tuan Tran(16)
235,487*
All current Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (20 persons)(17)
3,183,052*

*    Represents holdings of less than 1% based on shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT77

Ownership of Our Stock
(1)Based on the Schedule 13G filed by Berkshire Hathaway Inc. on May 25, 2022. According to the Schedule 13G, (i) Warren E. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. have sole voting power over no shares, shared voting power over 120,952,818 shares, sole dispositive power over no shares, and shared dispositive power over 120,952,818 shares; and (ii) National Indemnity Company has sole voting power over no shares, shared voting power over 67,845,585 shares, sole dispositive power over no shares, and shared dispositive power over 67,845,585 shares. The Schedule 13G may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address for Berkshire Hathaway and Mr. Buffett is 3555 Farnam Street, Omaha, NE 68131. The address for National Indemnity Company is 3024 Harney Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131.
(2)Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed by the Vanguard Group on February 9, 2023. According to its Schedule 13G/A, the Vanguard Group reported having sole voting power over no shares, shared voting power over 1,424,248 shares, sole dispositive power over 89,507,819 shares, and shared dispositive power over 4,145,622 shares. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of December 31, 2022 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address for the Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(3)Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2023 by BlackRock, Inc. According to its Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock, Inc. reported having sole voting power over 80,285,956 shares, shared voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over 90,266,985 shares and shared dispositive power over no shares. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of December 31, 2022 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
(4)Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023 by Dodge & Cox. According to its Schedule 13G/A, Dodge & Cox reported having sole voting power over 49,994,452 shares, shared voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over 52,451,225 shares and shared dispositive power over no shares. The securities reported on the Schedule 13G/A are beneficially owned by clients of Dodge & Cox, which clients may include investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and other managed accounts, and which clients have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, and the proceeds from the sale of, HP’s stock. The Schedule 13G/A contained information as of December 31, 2022 and may not reflect current holdings of HP’s stock. The address of Dodge & Cox is 555 California Street, 40th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104.
(5)Includes 28,027 shares that Ms. Alvarez has elected to defer receipt of until the termination of her service as a member of the Board.
(6)Includes 40,245 shares that Mr. Bennett has elected to defer receipt of until the termination of his service as a member of the Board.
(7)Includes 146,148 shares that Mr. Bergh has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.
(8)Includes 84,735 shares that Ms. Brown-Philpot has elected to defer receipt of until the termination of her service as a member of the Board.
(9)Includes 51,284 shares that Ms. Burns has elected to defer receipt of until the termination of her service as a member of the Board.
(10)Includes 159,671 shares that Ms. Citrino has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 45,117 shares that Ms. Citrino has elected to defer receipt of until the termination of her service as a member of the Board.
(11)Includes 34,401 shares that Mr. Clemmer has elected to defer receipt of until the termination of his service as a member of the Board.
(12)Includes 7,876 shares that Ms. Rucker has elected to defer receipt of until the termination of her service as a member of the Board.
(13)Includes 173,137 shares that Mr. Cho has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.
(14)Includes 581,949 shares that Mr. Lores has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.
(15)Includes 125,918 shares that Ms. Myers has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 13,322 shares that Ms. Myers has the right to acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units.
(16)Includes 173,137 shares that Mr. Tran has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options.
(17)Includes 1,446,324 shares that current executive officers and Directors have the right to acquire by exercise of stock options, 26,217 shares that current executive officers have the right to acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units, and 291,685 shares for which Directors have elected to defer receipt until the termination of their service as a member of the Board.
78
logo_hp.jpg 

Stockholder Proposal
Stockholder Proposal
Right to Act by Written Consent
icon_crossbox.jpg
The Board Recommends a Vote Against this Proposal
This stockholder proposal has been submitted by John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278 (the beneficial owner of 200 shares of HP Common Stock). The proponent has requested we include the proposal and supporting statement in this proxy statement, and, if properly presented, the proposal will be voted on at the annual meeting.

This proposal and supporting statement are quoted verbatim below and HP is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained in them.

The HP Board recommends a voteAGAINSTthis proposal and its opposition statement can be found below the proposal.

Proposal 5 – Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent

chevedden_graphic.jpg
Shareholders request that our board of directors undertake suchtake the steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by the shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize thean action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to give shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any appropriate topic for written consent.

Hundreds of major companies enable

We gave 51%-support to this proposal topic in 2018. Plus we gave 49%-support to this proposal topic in 2020. The 2020 vote was in effect a 51%-vote because management put its hand on the scale in regard to the 2020 proposal. Management spent shareholder action by written consent. money to do extra advertisements specifically against the 2020 proposal and it still got 49%-support.
This proposal topic won majority shareholder supportis all the more important at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent. This proposal topic also won 63%-support at Cigna Corp. (CI) in 2019. This proposal topic would have received higher votes than 63%HP Inc. due to 67% at these companies if more shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice.

This proposal topic also won 51%-support at our 2018 annual meeting. Written consent is gaining acceptance as a more valuable right for shareholders than therestricted right to call for a special shareholder meeting.

Taking action The only shares that can formally participate in calling for special shareholder meeting are the shares that are not held in street name.

Thus if 50% of HP shares are non street name shares then it would take 30% of those shares to call for a special shareholder meeting. But since only 60% of HP shares have the time to vote annually it could take 50% of the non street name shares that vote to call a special shareholder meeting.
Thus what seems to be a favorable 15% right to call special shareholder meeting turns into an unfavorable 50% right to call for a special shareholder meeting plus we have no right to act by written consent. Many companies allow for both a right to call a shareholder meeting and a shareholder right to act by written consent. A 50% stock ownership threshold to call for a special shareholder meeting means that any fleeting shareholder thought of calling for a special shareholder meeting is killed in the crib.
Action by written consent in place of a meeting is a meanshardly ever used by shareholders can use to raise important matters outsidebut the normal annual meeting cycle like the election of a new director. This is particularly important since our stock has fallen from $25 in October 2019. Poor stock performance also follows a June 2018 announcement of additional share repurchase authorization of up to $4 Billion which was supposed to increase the price of HP stock even if HP does not perform better.

Dion Weisler is no longer our CEO after his $27 million in total realized pay in 2018. And there is the October 2019 headline that HP stock tumbled after HP announced plans to cut up to 9,000 jobs.

Hopefully Mr. Enrique Lores will break with the recent practice of a remote communication annual meeting. A live annual meeting will allow shareholders to be impressed with the plans that Mr. Lores has for HP. A live annual meeting will almost guarantee that there will be a news article on the annual meeting (as opposed to a remote communication meeting) for the benefitmain point of the vast majorityright act by written consent is that it gives shareholders at least significant standing to engage effectively with management.

Management will have an incentive to genuinely engage with shareholders instead of shareholders.stonewalling if shareholders have a realistic Plan B option of acting by written consent. Management likes to claim that shareholders have multiple means to communicate with management but in most cases these means are as effective as mailing a post card to the CEO. A photograph of Mr. Lores that accompaniedright to act by written consent is an article on his new HP job appears to show him enjoying a presentation to a live audience.

important step for effective shareholder engagement with management.

Please vote yes:
Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent - Proposal 5

Proxy Statement77
2023 PROXY STATEMENT79


Table of Contents

Stockholder Proposals

Statement in Opposition

The

Stockholder Proposal
Board Response and Recommendation
Your Board has carefully reviewed this proposal and unanimously recommends a voteAGAINSTit for the following key reasons:

the existing right of HP stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders at a 15% threshold;

HP’s strong stockholder engagement practices year-round, including recently and specifically with respect to a proposal to permit stockholders to act by written consent without a meeting of stockholders; and

the Board’s belief that the proposal would circumvent the protections, procedural safeguards and advantages provided to all stockholders by stockholder meetings.

we believe that when stockholders are asked to act on any matter, ALL stockholders – not just a select few- should have their votes solicited and an opportunity to consider the matter in an open forum at a regular or special meeting;

consistent with this principle, we support the right of stockholders to submit proposals for action at meetings of stockholders, to call for special meetings (at a 15% threshold), and to nominate candidates for election as director via proxy access;
as reflected in the proposal, we believe stockholder action by written consent of a bare majority circumvents the protections, procedural safeguards and advantages provided to ALL stockholders by stockholder meetings; and
this same proposal was voted on by HP’s stockholders at its 2020 and 2021 annual meetings, and was not approved, in our view indicating support for the Board’s position on this proposal, and more generally, that action by written consent denies all stockholders the right to consider a matter.
HP continually evaluates stockholder feedback and developments in corporate governance and implements appropriate changes to its corporate governance policies and practices that it believes are in the best interests of HP and its stockholders.

Our Following engagement with our stockholders were given an opportunityin response to consider a nearly identical proposal at our 2018 Annual Meeting. At that meeting, holders of 37.5% of our outstanding shares expressed support for an advisory proposal to provide stockholders with the ability to act by written consent without a meeting of stockholders. Of the votes cast, 50.4% supported the proposal, while 49.2% voted against it, with 0.3% abstaining. The Board took note of the closeness of the vote on the written consent proposal at our 2018 annual meeting, the 2018 Annual Meeting andBoard amended our Bylaws in 2019 to lower the significant lack of consensus reflected in the vote, as well as the importance of respecting the perspectives expressed by all stockholders.threshold share ownership required to call a special meeting to 15% (from 25%). The Board also remained concerned about the disruptive effect a stockholder written consent solicitation could have on the Board’s and our stockholders’ ability to thoroughly consider significant corporate actions and possible alternatives. As such, the Board determined that this approach to further facilitate the appropriate approach was to conduct further engagement with ourability of stockholders to better understand the vote results and incorporate stockholder feedback into the Board’s ultimate response to that vote.

As part of this engagement, we reached out to our 75 largest stockholders at that time (representing approximately 68% of our outstanding shares at the time). We ultimately received feedback from stockholders that represented approximately 50% of our outstanding shares at the time. Of those that provided feedback, approximately 60% (representing almost 30% of our outstanding shares at the time) voted against the written consent proposal at our 2018 Annual Meeting and approximately 40% (representing approximately 20% of our outstanding shares at the time) voted for the written consent proposal at our 2018 Annual Meeting. We believe these stockholders consulted as part of this engagement were representative of our stockholder base, as these stockholders represented a broad-based group, and included stockholders that voted for and stockholders that voted against the written consent proposal at our 2018 Annual Meeting.

As previously disclosed, as part of that engagement, we heard the following key perspectives from our stockholders.

A large majority of the stockholders we consulted preferred the right to call a special meeting over the right to act by written consent, expressing views that the former is more protective of stockholders, accessible and inclusive.

Nearly 76% of the stockholders we conversed with during our engagement (representing over 38% of our outstanding shares at the time) preferred that we consider lowering our special meeting threshold instead of implementing written consent.

Many of those with whom we spoke volunteered that they had voted against the written consent proposal specifically because HP already afforded stockholders the right to call a special meeting (at the time, with a 25% threshold).

Moreover, of the stockholders consulted, approximately 40% (representing approximately 20% of our outstanding shares at the time) had supported the written consent proposal at our 2018 Annual Meeting. However, when presented with the option of lowering our special meeting threshold instead of implementing the right to act by written consent, approximately 40% of these stockholders preferred lowering our special meeting threshold.

78www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Stockholder Proposals

Accordingly, the Board determined itin between annual meetings would be most consistent with the wishes of the broadest group of our stockholders and responsive to the vote on2018 written consent vote. We believe that stockholder support of this approach is evidenced by nearly identical written consent proposals at our 2020 and 2021 Annual Meetings failing to receive the requisite support from stockholders.

Following the receipt of the written consent proposal at the 2018 Annual Meeting to further facilitate the ability of stockholders to act in betweenfor this annual meetings. Specifically, in lieu of adopting a written consent right, effective as of February 7, 2019, the Board amended our Bylaws to lower the threshold share ownership required to call a special meeting, from 25% to 15% of our outstanding shares.

HP also regularly engages with its stockholders regarding a variety of topics, including corporate governance, in order to stay informed of issues important to its stockholders. These practices provide stockholders with meaningful, year-round opportunities to bring important matters to the attention of HP and the Board.

Following the receipt of this proposal, the Board revisited its review and analysis from last year.analysis. Specifically, the Board considered whether there have been any material changes to the factors that the Board had considered last year with respect to the potential adoption of a written consent right. After thorough consideration, the Board determined that adopting a written consent right is not in the best interests of HP or our stockholders at this time for the following reasons:

HP’s most recent stockholder engagement conducted in January 2020 confirmed once again that many of our stockholders (representing approximately 34% of our outstanding shares at the time) continue to be satisfied with our current corporate governance profile, robust record of engagement with and responsiveness to stockholders, and commitment to transparency;

the slim margin by which the 2018 proposal passed, and the significant number of stockholders that opposed that proposal;

a nearly identical written consent stockholder proposal having failed at our 2015 Annual Meeting, with support of only 43.3% of votes cast;

other governance rights we already provide our stockholders, including a meaningful proxy access right;

the fact that the written consent process is less transparent and less democratic than action at a stockholder meeting, because stockholder action by written consent may not result in all stockholders receiving advance notice of a proposed action prior to its approval by written consent and does not permit a variety of views on a proposal to be exchanged;

the fact that action by written consent can create substantial confusion and disruption, as different stockholder groups may solicit multiple written consents simultaneously, some of which may be duplicative or contradictory; and

our current stockholder base and the relatively consistent presence of at least one stockholder that has owned or controlled the vote of more than 10% of our outstanding shares over the past few years, which makes the 15% threshold to call a special meeting realistic to achieve.

HP believes that every stockholder’s vote is important and deserves consideration;
action by written consent is less transparent and less democratic than action at a stockholder meeting, because stockholder action by written consent may not result in all stockholders receiving advance notice of a proposed action prior to its approval by written consent, does not permit a variety of views on a proposal to be exchanged or inquiries about proposed actions to be made, and does not require that a proxy statement containing accurate and complete information be distributed before the proposed action;
this concern is particularly acute in that it would provide a small subset of stockholders, who may have short-term or special interests and have no fiduciary duties to other stockholders, an ability to unilaterally approve their own proposed actions that are not in the best interests of all stockholders, without giving the remaining stockholders notice of the proposed action or the opportunity to participate in it;
action by written consent can create substantial confusion and disruption, as different stockholder groups may solicit multiple written consents simultaneously, some of which may be duplicative or contradictory, which could create administrative and financial burdens for HP without a corresponding benefit to stockholders; and
our stockholders’ existing right to call a special meeting at a 15% threshold is realistic to achieve given our current stockholder base; moreover contrary to the assertions made in the proposal, beneficial owners who hold their shares in “street name” through a broker, trustee or other nominee can still exercise this right by instructing the record holder through which they hold shares to act on their behalf.
For all of the above reasons, the Board continues to believe that the risk of abuse associated with stockholder action by written consent, including bypassing procedural protections that offer transparency and advance notice, both of which are afforded with a stockholder meeting, as well as HP’s commitment to good corporate governance, HP’s strong stockholder engagement program and HP stockholders’ existing right to call a special meeting with a 15% threshold, make this proposal is not in the best interest of all of our stockholders.

Board Recommendation

The Board believes that adoption of this proposal is unnecessary and not in HP’s or our stockholders’ best interests for the reasons described above. Accordingly, the Board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.

Vote Required

Approval of this stockholder proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of HP common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the annual meeting.

Proxy Statement79
80
logo_hp.jpg 


Table of Contents

Stockholder Proposals

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 2
To Repeal Certain Provisions of, or Amendments to, the Company’s Bylaws Adopted After February 7, 2019
The Board recommends a vote AGAINSTthis proposal.
Other matters
Questions and Answers
Proxy Materials

The Company has received notice from Xerox Holdings Corporation, 201 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851-1056 of its intention to present the following resolution for action at the annual meeting, which would repeal each provision of, or amendment to, the Company’s Bylaws adopted by the Board without the approval of the Company’s stockholders subsequent to February 7, 2019 (the date of the most recent publicly disclosed Bylaws) and up to and including the date of the annual meeting.

Proposal 6 – To Repeal Certain Provisions of, or Amendments to, the Company’s Bylaws Adopted After February 7, 20191.

The following is the text of the proposed resolution:

RESOLVED, that each provision of, or amendment to, the Bylaws adopted by the Board without the approval of the Company’s stockholders subsequent to February 7, 2019 (the date of the most recent publicly disclosed Bylaws) and prior to the approval of this resolution be, and they hereby are, repealed, effective as of the time this resolution is approved by the Company’s stockholders.

If Xerox Holdings Corporation does not properly present this proposal at the annual meeting, this proposal will not be submitted to a vote.

Statement in OppositionWhy am I receiving these materials?

The Board recommends that stockholders voteAGAINSTthis proposal for the following key reasons:

This proposal seeks to repeal any provisions of, or amendments to, the Company’s Bylaws adopted without stockholder approval after February 7, 2019 and up to and including the date of the annual meeting, without regard to the subject matter of any Bylaw provisions or amendments in question. No provisions or amendments to the Company’s Bylaws have been adopted subsequent to February 7, 2019. While the Board does not currently expect to adopt any amendments to the Bylaws prior to the annual meeting, the Board could determine prior to the annual meeting that an amendment is necessary and in the best interest of the stockholders. The Board believes that the automatic repeal of any Bylaw amendment, irrespective of its content, duly adopted by the Board (whether with or without stockholder approval) could have the effect of repealing one or more properly adopted Bylaw amendments that the Board determined to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and adopted in furtherance of its fiduciary duties, including in response to future events not yet known to the Company.

As the Board is fully empowered by its governing documents and applicable law to alter, amend, repeal or add provisions to the Company’s Bylaws in accordance with its fiduciary duties and no provision of the Company’s Bylaws is expected to be impacted by this proposal, we believe this proposal represents no purpose other than to limit Board actions otherwise permitted by the Company’s governing documents and Delaware law.

80www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Stockholder Proposals

Board Recommendation

The Board believes that adoption of this proposal is unnecessary and not in HP’s or our stockholders’ best interests for the reasons described above. Accordingly, the Board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.

Vote Required

Approval of this stockholder proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of HP common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the annual meeting, except with respect to all or any portion of Article II, Section 3.2, Section 3.3, Section 3.4, Section 6.1, Section 6.4 and Article IX of the Bylaws, with respect to which approval of this proposal requires a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon.

Proxy Statement81


Table of Contents

Questions and Answers

Proxy Materials

1.     

Why am I receiving these materials?

We have providedmade these materials available to you or delivered paper copies to you by mail in connection with our annual meeting of stockholders, which will take place online on [          ], [          ], 2020, at [          ].Monday, April 24, 2023. As a stockholder, you are invited to participate in the annual meeting via live audio webcast and vote on the business items described in this proxy statement. This proxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you under the SEC rules and that is designed to assist you in voting your shares. The information in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting, the voting process, the Board and Board committees, the compensation of our Directors and certain executive officers for fiscal 20192022 and other required information. See Questions 1216 and 1317 below for information regarding how you can vote your shares at the annual meeting or by proxy (without attending the annual meeting).

2.     

What is included in the proxy materials?

2.What is included in the proxy materials?
The proxy materials include:

our proxy statement for the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders; and
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022.
If you received a paper copy of these materials by mail, the proxy statement for the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders; and

our 2019 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019.

These materials also include the WHITEa proxy card or a voting instruction card for the 2020annual meeting. If you received a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials, see Questions 16 and 17 below for information regarding how you can vote your shares.

3.Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the full set of proxy materials?
This year, we are using the SEC rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to many of our stockholders a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders receiving the notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, should they so desire. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials. In addition, the notice contains instructions on how you may request access to proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically on an ongoing basis.
4.Why didn’t I receive a notice in the mail about the Internet availability of the proxy materials?
We are providing some of our stockholders, including stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials and some of our stockholders who are living outside of the United States, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials.
In addition, we are providing proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials by e-mail to those stockholders who have previously elected delivery of the proxy materials or notice electronically. Those stockholders should receive an e-mail containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website.
5.How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?
Your notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials, proxy card, or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how to:
view our proxy materials for the annual meeting of stockholders. WHITEon the Internet; and
instruct us to send our future proxy cards are being solicited on behalf of our Board. If you sign your WHITE proxy card but do not give instructions with respect to voting for Directors and other proposals, your shares will be voted by Enrique Lores, Steven J. Fieler and Kim M. Rivera, as proxy holders, FOR the election of all 12 Board nominees, FOR ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (“say on pay” vote), FOR the approval of the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding written consent and AGAINST the Stockholder Bylaws Proposal. Our Board strongly urges you not to vote any blue proxy card sentmaterials to you electronically by Xerox, and to vote FOR our Board of Directors’ nominees, AGAINST the Stockholder Bylaws Proposal and on the other matters to be voted on at the meeting in accordance with the Board’s recommendations by voting via Internet or by telephone by following the easy instructions provided on the enclosed WHITE proxy card. You may also sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card to the address indicated on the card, but we strongly encourage you to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet.

e-mail.

Our proxy materials are also publicly available on our dedicated annual meeting website at [          ].

www.proxyvote.com/HP. Please have your 16-digit control number available to access them.
3.     

What should I do if I receive a blue proxy card from Xerox?

2023 PROXY STATEMENT81

The Board strongly urges you NOT to vote using any blue


Other Matters
Your notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials, proxy card, or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how you may request access to proxy materials electronically on an ongoing basis. Choosing to access your future proxy materials electronically will help us conserve natural resources and reduce the costs of distributing our proxy materials. If you choose to access future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an e-mail with instructions containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to access proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.
6.How may I obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials?
Stockholders receiving a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials on their notice. Stockholders receiving notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials by e-mail will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials as part of that e-mail. All stockholders who do not receive a notice or an e-mail will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.
7.I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy?
If you share an address with another stockholder, you may receive only one paper copy of the proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials, as applicable, unless you have provided contrary instructions. If you wish to receive a separate set of the proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials now, please request the additional copy by contacting Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) at:
By Internet: www.proxyvote.com/HP
By telephone: 1-800-579-1639
By e-mail: sendmaterial@proxyvote.com
If you request a separate set of the proxy materials or notice of Internet availability of the proxy materials by e-mail, please be sure to include your control number in the subject line. A separate set of proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials, as applicable, will be sent promptly following receipt of your request. If you are a beneficial owner and wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials now, please request the additional copy by contacting your individual broker.
If you by Xerox. The Board does NOT endorse any Xeroxare a stockholder of record and wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials, as applicable, in the future, please contact our transfer agent. See Question 21 below.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held through a broker, trustee, or other nominee and unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the electionwish to receive a separate set of allproxy materials or notice of the nominees proposed byInternet availability of the Board and namedproxy materials, as applicable, in thisthe future, please call Broadridge at:
1-866-540-7095
All stockholders also may write to HP at the address below to request a separate set of proxy statement and AGAINST the Stockholder Bylaws Proposal. If you previously voted using a blue proxy card sent to you by Xerox, you can revoke it and vote FOR the Director nominees recommended by the Board by voting viamaterials or notice of the Internet or by telephone by followingavailability of the easy instructions provided on the enclosed WHITE proxy card. You may also sign, datematerials, as applicable, and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card to the address indicated on the card, but we strongly encourage you to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet. Only the latest-dated validly executed proxy that you submitmaterials will be counteddelivered promptly upon receiving your request:
HP Inc.
Investor Relations
1501 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
8.I share an address with another stockholder, and anywe received more than one paper copy of the proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials. How do we obtain a single copy in the future?
Stockholders of record sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials, as applicable, and who wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future may be revoked at any time priorcontact our transfer agent. See Question 21 below.
Beneficial owners of shares held through a broker, trustee, or other nominee sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials or notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials, as applicable, and who wish to its exercise atreceive a single copy of such materials in the 2020 annual meetingfuture may contact Broadridge at:
1-866-540-7095
9.What should I do if I receive more than one notice or e-mail about the Internet availability of stockholders. If you attend the meeting and desire to vote in person, your proxy will not be used.

4.     

What should I do if I receive more than one copy of HP’s proxy materials?

materials or more than one paper copy of the proxy materials?

You may receive more than one notice, more than one e-mail, or more than one paper copy of HP’sthe proxy materials, including multiple paper copies of this proxy statement and multiple WHITE proxy cards or voting instruction forms.cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate notice, a separate e-mail, or a separate voting instruction formcard for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a stockholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you may receive
82
logo_hp.jpg 

Other Matters
more than one WHITEnotice, more than one e-mail or more than one proxy card. In order toTo vote all of the shares held by you in multiple accounts, you will need to vote the shares held in each account separately. Please follow the voting instructions provided on each WHITE proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

You will likely receive multiple mailings from Xerox,by proxy, you must either vote by Internet or by telephone, or complete, sign, date, and HP will likely conduct multiple mailings prior to the annual meeting date to ensure stockholders have HP’s latest proxy information and materials to vote. HP will send you a WHITEreturn each proxy card withand voting instruction card that you receive and/or vote over the Internet the shares represented by each mailing, regardless of whethernotice and e-mail that you receive (unless you have previously voted. The latest datedrequested and received a proxy you submit will be counted, and, if you wish to vote as recommendedcard or voting instruction card for the shares represented by our Board, then you should only vote by using the WHITE proxy card.

82www.hpannualmeeting.com


Tableone or more of Contentsthose notices or e-mails).

10.

Other Matters

5.    

Does the Board recommend that I take any action with respect to the Xerox exchange offer?

Xerox has commenced an unsolicited exchange offer to acquire all outstanding sharesHow may I obtain a copy of HP common stock. After consultation with its independent financial and legal advisors, the Board concluded that the unsolicited exchange offer is not in the best interests of HP stockholders and unanimously recommended that HP stockholders reject the offer and NOT tender their HP shares pursuant to the offer. On March 5, 2020, HP filed a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 with the SEC relating to the unsolicited exchange offer. We encourage you to read the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement for more information about the Board's reasonsHP’s 2022 Form 10-K and other important information.

6.     

How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?

Our proxy materials are also publicly available onfinancial information?

Stockholders may request a free copy of our dedicated annual meeting website at:

[         ].

combined 2022 Annual Report and 2023 Proxy Statement, which includes our 2022 Form 10-K and the financial statements and the financial statement schedules for the last completed fiscal year, from:

HP Inc.
Investor Relations
1501 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
https://investor.hp.com/resources/information-request/default.aspx
All of HP’s filings, including the 20192022 Form 10-K are also available on HP’s Investor Relations site:

https://investor.hp.com

We also will furnish any exhibit to the 20192022 Form 10-K if specifically requested.

Voting Information
Please note however,11.What proposals will be voted on at the meeting? How does the Board recommend that if your shares are held by a broker, trustee, or other nominee (thatI vote and what is in “street name”), or if you hold shares in the HP 401(k) Plan, you must use the voting instruction form provided by thatrequirement for each of the proposals? What effect will abstentions and broker trustee or other nominee to instruct such broker, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares on your behalf.non-votes have?

Voting Information

7.

What proposals will be voted on at the meeting? How does the Board recommend that I vote and what is the voting requirement for each of the proposals?


ProposalsBoard
Recommendation
Votes RequiredEffect of
Abstentions
Effect of Broker
Non-Votes if any*
Election of DirectorsFOR EACH
NOMINEE
FOR ALL OF THE NOMINEES
RECOMMENDED BY
THE BOARD
Plurality – 12 nominees who receive the greatest numberMajority of votes castNoneNoneNo effect
Ratification of Independent Registered
Registered Public
Accounting Firm
FORMajority of the shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposalSame as “AGAINST”
“AGAINST”
None
N/A (No Broker
Non-Votes
(Expected to be Routine Matter))
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive
Executive Compensation
(“ (“Say on Pay” Vote)
FORMajority of the shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposalSame as
“AGAINST”
No effect
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future “Say on Pay” VotesONE YEARMajority of the shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal*Same as “AGAINST”
“AGAINST”
NoneNo effect
VoteStockholder Proposal: Right to Approve theAct by
Company’s 2021 Employee
Stock Purchase PlanWritten Consent
FORAGAINSTMajority of the shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposalSame as “AGAINST”
“AGAINST”
None
Stockholder Proposal No. 1: Right to Act by Written ConsentAGAINSTMajority of the shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposalSame as “AGAINST”None
Stockholder Proposal No. 2: To Repeal Certain Provisions of, or Amendments to, the Company’s Bylaws Adopted After February 7, 2019AGAINSTMajority of the shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal, except with respect to all or any portion of Article II, Section 3.2, Section 3.3, Section 3.4, Section 6.1, Section 6.4 and Article IX of the Bylaws, with respect to which approval of this proposal requires majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon.Same as “AGAINST”None, except with respect to all or any portion of Article II, Section 3.2, Section 3.3, Section 3.4, Section 6.1, Section 6.4 and Article IX of the Bylaws, same as AGAINSTNo effect
*In light of Xerox’s intention to nominate a slate of 12 Directors, we expect the annual meeting to have a contested Director election. Under the NYSE rules, this means that for shares held in accounts to which Xerox’s proxy materials have been sent, brokers, trustees and other nominees will not have discretionary authority to vote for any matters listed above (including the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm) unless they receive your instructions.

Proxy Statement83


Table*    If none of Contents

Other Matters

the four choices for this proposal receive an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of HP common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to be voted on this proposal, the Board will consider the choice that receives the highest number of votes as the choice supported by our stockholders.

We also will consider any other business that properly comes before the annual meeting. See Question 2228 below.

8.What are broker non-votes?

12.What are broker non-votes?
A broker non-vote occurs with respect to a proposal when a broker, trustee, or other nominee has discretionary authority to vote on one or more proposals to be voted on at a meeting of stockholders but is not permitted to vote on other proposals without instructions from the beneficial owner and the beneficial owner fails to provide the nominee with such instructions.owner. Under the rules of the NYSE, brokers, trustees, or other nominees may normallygenerally vote on routine matters without instructions from a beneficial owner but cannot vote on non-routine matters. However, because ofIn tabulating the contested nature ofvoting results for any particular proposal, broker non-votes are not counted.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT83

Other Matters
Note that whether a proposal is considered routine or non-routine is subject to stock exchange rules and final determination by the election of Directors, under the rules of the NYSE, ifstock exchange. Even with respect to routine matters, some brokers are choosing not to exercise discretionary voting authority. As a result, we urge you are the beneficial owner of shares rather than the stockholder of record and receive proxy materials from Xerox,to direct your broker, will not be abletrustee or other nominee how to vote your shares with respect to any of theon all proposals to be voted at the annual meeting, whether routine or not, unless they receiveensure that your instructions.

vote is counted.

If you provide specific instructions with regard to certain items, your shares will be voted as you instruct on such items. If you vote by proxy card and sign the WHITE proxy card without giving specific instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board (FOR all of our nominees to the Board, FOR ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (“say on pay” vote), FORONE YEAR for the approvalfrequency of the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,future “say on pay” votes, and AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding written consent and AGAINST the Stockholder Bylaws Proposal)consent).

For any shares you hold in the HP 401(k) Plan, if your voting instructions are not received by [          ], 2020,11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 19, 2023, your shares will be voted in proportion to the way the shares held by the other HP 401(k) Plan participants are voted, except as may be otherwise required by law.

9.

Is cumulative voting permitted for the election of Directors?

Broker non-votes differ from abstentions. For the effect of abstentions on the matters to be voted on at the annual meeting, please refer to Question 11 above.
13.Is cumulative voting permitted for the election of Directors?
No, you may not cumulate your votes in the election of Directors. At the 2016 Annual Meeting, our stockholders approved an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation eliminating cumulative voting. Therefore, cumulative voting is no longer available to our stockholders.

10.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

14.What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
Stockholder of Record—If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to HP or to a third party, or to vote your shares during the annual meeting.
Beneficial Owner—If your shares are held in a brokerage account, by a trustee, or by another nominee (that is, in “street name”), you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares. As the beneficial owner of those shares, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee, or nominee how to vote, or to vote your shares during the annual meeting (other than shares held in the HP 401(k) Plan, which must be voted prior to the annual meeting).
Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, trustee, or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between
15.Who is entitled to vote and how many shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Stockholder of Record—If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to HP or to a third party, or to vote your shares during the annual meeting.

Beneficial Owner—If your shares are held in a brokerage account, by a trustee, or by another nominee (that is, in “street name”), you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares. As the beneficial owner of those shares, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee, or nominee how to vote, or to vote your shares in person by ballot at the annual meeting (other than shares held in the HP 401(k) Plan, which must be voted prior to the annual meeting).


11.

Who is entitled to vote and how many shares can I vote?

can I vote?

Each holder of shares of HP common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on [               ], 2020,February 23, 2023, the record date for the annual meeting, is entitled to cast one vote per share on all items being voted upon at the annual meeting. You may vote all shares owned by you as of this time, including (1) shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record, including shares purchased through our dividend reinvestment program and employee stock purchase plans, and shares held through our Direct Registration Service; and (2) shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, trustee, or other nominee.

On the record date, HP had approximately [          ]985,328,082 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

12.

How can I vote my shares in person at the annual meeting?

16.How can I vote my shares during the annual meeting?
This year’s annual meeting will be held entirely online to allow greater participation. Stockholders may participate in the annual meeting by visiting the following website:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HPQ2023
To participate in the annual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice of Internet availability of the proxy materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you have any questions about your control number, please contact the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares. Shares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted in person atelectronically during the annual meeting. Shares for which you are the beneficial owner but not the stockholder of record may also be voted in person atelectronically during the annual meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares, exceptmeeting.
Please note that shares held in the HP 401(k) Plan cannot be voted in person atelectronically during the annual meeting. If you hold shares in the HP 401(k) Plan, your voting instructions must be received by [          ],11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on [               ], 2020April 19, 2023 for

84www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Other Matters

the trustee to vote your shares. However, holders of shares in the HP 401(k) Plan will still be able to attendview the annual meeting webcast and ask questions during the annual meeting.

Even if you plan to attendparticipate in the annual meeting online, we recommend that you also vote by proxy by using the WHITE proxy card as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attendparticipate in the annual meeting.

13.

How can I vote my shares without attending the annual meeting?

84
logo_hp.jpg 


Other Matters
17.How can I vote my shares without participating in the annual meeting?
Whether you are ahold shares directly as the stockholder of record or through a broker, trustee, or other nominee as the beneficial owner, but notyou may direct how your shares are voted without participating in the stockholderannual meeting. There are three ways to vote by proxy:
VIA THE INTERNET: Stockholders who have received a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the notice. Stockholders who have received notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials by e-mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions included in the e-mail. Stockholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card.
VIA TELEPHONE: Stockholders of record you can votewho live in the United States or Canada may submit proxies by telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following ways:

VIA THE INTERNET: You can vote via the Internet by following the easy instructions on the enclosed WHITE proxy card or voting instruction form.

VIA TELEPHONE:You can vote by telephone by following the easy instructions on the WHITE proxy card or voting instruction form.

VIA MAIL: We are encouraging all stockholders to submit their proxies by Internet or by telephone, given the circumstances relating to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). You may also sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card or voting instruction form to the address indicated on the card or form, but we strongly encourage you to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet.


14.

What is the deadline for voting my shares?

the instructions. Stockholders of record who have received a notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials by mail must have the control number that appears on their notice available when voting. Stockholders of record who received notice of the Internet availability of the proxy materials by e-mail must have the control number included in the e-mail available when voting. Stockholders of record who have received a proxy card by mail must have the control number that appears on their proxy card available when voting. Most stockholders who are beneficial owners of their shares living in the United States or Canada and who have received a voting instruction card by mail may vote by phone by calling the number specified on the voting instruction card provided by their broker, trustee, or nominee. Those stockholders should check the voting instruction card for telephone voting availability.

VIA MAIL: Stockholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy card or voting instruction card and mailing it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope.
18.What is the deadline for voting my shares?
If you hold shares as the stockholder of record or as a beneficial owner, your vote by proxy must be received before the polls close during the annual meeting.

If you hold shares in the HP 401(k) Plan, your voting instructions must be received by [          ],11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on [          ], 2020April 19, 2023 for the trustee to vote your shares. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held through a broker, trustee, or other nominee (including any shares held as a result of your participation in HP’s 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”)), please follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, trustee or nominee. The deadline to provide voting instructions for shares you hold as a beneficial owner may be earlier than the deadline provided above.

15.

May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

19.May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time prior to the vote during the annual meeting, except that any change to your voting instructions for shares held in the HP 401(k) Plan must be provided by [               ],11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on [          ], 2020April 19, 2023 as described above.

If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your vote by: (1) granting a new proxy bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy); (2) providing a written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary at the address below in Question 2632 prior to your shares being voted; or (3) attendingparticipating in the meeting and voting your shares electronically during the annual meeting. Participation in person. Attendance at the annual meeting will not by itself revokecause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically make that request. If you are a proxy. For shares you hold beneficially in the name of a broker, trustee, or other nominee,beneficial owner you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee, or nominee, or by attendingparticipating in the meeting and if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker or nominee giving you the right to voteelectronically voting your shares votingduring the meeting (except that shares held in person.

If you have previously signed a proxy card sent to you by Xerox or otherwisethe HP 401(k) Plan cannot be voted according to instructions provided by Xerox, you may change your vote by voting via the Internet or by telephone by following the easy instructions provided on the enclosed WHITE proxy card. You may also sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card to the address indicated on the card, but we strongly encourage you to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet. Submitting a later-dated vote using Xerox’s blue proxy card will revoke any votes you previously made using the Company’s WHITE proxy card.

16.

Are stockholders entitled to exercise appraisal rights in connection with any matter identified in this proxy statement to be acted upon at the annual meeting?

Stockholders will not have rights of appraisal or similar dissenters' rights with respect to any of the matters identified in this proxy statement to be acted uponelectronically at the annual meeting.

17.

Is my vote confidential?

meeting).

20.Is my vote confidential?
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed, either within HP or to third parties, except: (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements; (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the votes; and (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation. Occasionally, stockholders provide on their proxy card written comments, which are then forwarded to management.

21.What if I have questions for our transfer agent?
Please contact our transfer agent, at the phone number or address listed below, with questions concerning stock certificates, dividend checks, transfer of ownership, or other matters pertaining to your stock account.
EQ Shareowner Services
1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101
Mendota Heights, MN 55120-4100
1-800-286-5977 (U.S. and Canada)
1-651-450-4064 (International)
18.

Who can answer my questions about how to vote?

2023 PROXY STATEMENT85

If you need assistance in voting your shares, you may call


Other Matters
A dividend reinvestment and stock purchase program is also available through our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated (“Innisfree”), TOLL-FREE at (877) 750-5838 (fromtransfer agent. For information about this program, please contact our EQ Shareowner Services transfer agent as follows:
EQ Shareowner Services
1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101
Mendota Heights, MN 55120-4100
1-800-286-5977 (U.S. and Canada)
1-651-450-4064 (International)
22.How can I attend the U.S. and Canada). From other countries, you may call Innisfree at +1 (412) 232-3651.

Proxy Statement85


annual meeting?

Table of Contents

Other Matters

19.

How can I attend the annual meeting?

TheThis year’s annual meeting will be held at [_______________] on [_______________], 2020. Directions to [_______________] cana completely virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be found at [_______________].

conducted through an audio webcast. You are entitled to attendparticipate in the annual meeting only if you were an HP stockholder of recordor joint holder as of the close of business on [                    ], 2020February 23, 2023 or if you hold a valid proxy for the annual meeting.

All stockholders

You will be requiredable to present a valid formattend the annual meeting of photo identification, such as a driver’s licensestockholders online and submit your questions before and during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HPQ2023. You also will be able to vote your shares electronically at the annual meeting (other than shares held through the HP 401(k) Plan, which must be voted prior to the meeting).
To participate in the annual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice of Internet availability of the proxy materials, on your proxy card or passport, and a printed admission ticket, which you can obtain and print by [     ].on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you are a stockholder of record,have any questions about your namecontrol number, please contact the bank, broker, or other nominee that holds your shares.
The meeting webcast will be verified againstbegin promptly at 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online access to the meeting will open at 1:30 p.m., Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time to log in to the meeting webcast and test your computer audio system.
Information as to how to obtain the list of stockholders of record on the record date priorentitled to your admission to the annual meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker, trustee or nominee, you must provide proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such as your most recent account statement prior to [          ], 2020 or other similar evidence of ownership.

No cameras, laptops, recording equipment, other similar electronic devices, signs, placards, briefcases, backpacks, large bags, or packages will be permitted in the annual meeting. We reserve the right to deny admittance to any stockholder who attempts to bring any such item into the annual meeting. Small purses are permissible, but they and any bags or packages permitted in the meeting room will be subject to inspection.

We are actively monitoring the public health concerns relating to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the protocols and recommendations that federal, state, and local governments may impose. Our headquarters are located in the County of Santa Clara, California, which on March 16, 2020 announced the implementation of “shelter in place” orders prohibiting virtually all group gatherings through April 7, 2020. We do not know if these restrictions or similar restrictions will remain in place on the date of the annual meeting. In order to comply with applicable legal restrictions and in order to promote the health and safety of the attendeesvote at the annual meeting we may take actions including changingwill be available during the time, date or locationten days preceding the annual meeting at the website for the annual meeting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HPQ2023.

23.What is the pre-meeting forum and how can I access it?
The online format for the annual meeting allows us to communicate more effectively with you. Our pre-meeting forum, where you can submit questions in advance of the meeting; conductingannual meeting, can be entered by visiting www.proxyvote.com/HP. We respond to all stockholder submissions received through the forum in writing on our investor relations website.
24.Why a virtual meeting?
Hosting a virtual meeting enables increased stockholder attendance and participation since stockholders can participate from any location around the world. You will be able to attend the annual meeting of stockholders online and submit your questions during the meeting in whole or in part by means of remote communication (including holding a virtual meeting); or imposing additional procedures or limitations on meeting attendees. If we take any of these steps, wevisiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HPQ2023. You also will publicly announce them prior to the annual meeting. As always, we strongly encourage yoube able to vote your shares by proxyelectronically at the annual meeting (other than shares held through the HP 401(k) Plan, which must be voted prior to the meeting).
25.What if during the check-in time or during the meeting and, further, we strongly encourageI have technical difficulties or trouble accessing the virtual meeting website?
We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call:
1-855-449-0991 (Toll-free)
1-720-378-5962 (Toll line)
26.How many shares must be present or represented to submit your proxies electronically—by telephone or by Internet—by followingconduct business at the easy instructions on the enclosed WHITE proxy card. Your vote is important, and voting electronically should facilitate the timely receipt of your proxy despite any potential disruptions in mail service due to COVID-19.

20.

How many shares must be present or represented to conduct business at the annual meeting?

annual meeting?

The quorum requirement for holding the annual meeting and transacting business is that holders of a majority of shares of HP common stock entitled to vote must be present in person or represented by proxy. Both abstentions and broker non-votes if any, described previously in Question 812 above are counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.
86
logo_hp.jpg 

Other Matters
27.What constitutes a quorum for the annual meeting, and what happens if a quorum is not present at the annual meeting?
A broker non-vote occurs with respect toquorum for the annual meeting is established if the holders of a proposal when a broker, trustee, or other nominee has discretionary authoritymajority in voting power of our stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on one or more proposals to be voted on at a meeting of stockholders but is not permitted to vote on other proposals without instructions from the beneficial owner and the beneficial owner fails to provide the nominee with such instructions. Because of the contested nature of the election of Directors, under the rules of the NYSE, if you are the beneficial owner of shares rather than the stockholder of record and receive proxy materials from Xerox, your broker will not be able to vote your shares with respect to any of the proposals to be voted at the annual meeting whether routine or not, unless they receive your instructions. Accordingly, while abstentions will continue to count for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, if you receive proxy materials from Xerox, failure to provide instructions to your broker, trustee, or other nominee on how to vote your shares will result in your shares not being counted asare present in determining the presence of a quorum at this annual meeting.

21.

What if a quorum is not present at the annual meeting?

person or by proxy. If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the annual meeting, then either the chairman of the annual meeting or the stockholders by vote of the holders of a majority of the stock present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting are authorized by our Bylaws to adjourn the annual meeting until a quorum is present or represented.

22.

What happens if additional matters are presented at the annual meeting?

28.What happens if additional matters are presented at the annual meeting?
Other than the sixfive items of business described in this proxy statement, we are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the annual meeting. If you grant a proxy, pursuant to the WHITE proxy card, the persons named as proxy holders, Enrique Lores, Steven J. Fieler,Julie Jacobs and Kim M. Rivera,Rick Hansen, will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting. In the event that any nominee should become unavailable, the proxy holders, Enrique Lores, Steven J. FielerJulie Jacobs and Kim M. Rivera,Rick Hansen, will vote for a substitute nominee or

86www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Other Matters

nominees designated by the Board, unless the Board decides to decrease the size of the Board. If any substitute nominees are so designated, we will file an amended proxy statement or additional soliciting material that, as applicable, identifies the substitute nominees, discloses that such nominees have consented to being named in the amended proxy statement or additional soliciting material and to serve as directors if elected, and includes certain biographical and other information about such nominees required by the applicable SEC rules.

23.

Who will serve as inspector of elections?

29.Who will serve as inspector of elections?
The inspector of elections will be a representative from an independent firm, [               ].

24.

Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?

Broadridge.

30.Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?
We expectintend to announce preliminary voting results based on the advice of our proxy solicitor shortly afterat the annual meeting and publish preliminaryfinal results based on the preliminary tabulation by the independent Inspector of election in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days of the annual meeting. Final results will be reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC as soon as the final certified tabulation is available from the independent inspector of elections.

25.
31.

Who will bear the cost for the solicitation of proxies by HP?

This solicitation of proxies is authorized by, and made on behalf of, our Board, and we will bear the cost for the solicitation of proxies by HP?

HP is making this solicitation and will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing, and distributing the notices and these proxy materials and soliciting proxies on the WHITE proxy card.votes. In addition to the mailing of the notices and these proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone, or by electronic communication by certain of our Directors, officers, and employees, named in Annex B, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. Additional information about persons who are participants in this proxy solicitation is set forth in Annex B.

As a result of the potential proxy solicitation by Xerox, we will incur additional costs in connection with our solicitation of proxies.

We have hired Innisfree M&A Incorporated (“Innisfree”) and Alliance Advisors LLC (“Alliance”) to assist us in the solicitation of votes described above. We will pay Innisfree a base fee of approximately $[                    ]$20,000 and Alliance a base fee of $35,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.customary costs and expenses for these services. We have agreed to indemnify Innisfree against certain liabilities arising out of or in connection with these services. Innisfree expects that approximately [   ] of its employees will assist in the solicitation. We also will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to stockholders.

We estimate that our additional out-of-pocket expenses beyond those normally associated with soliciting proxies

32.What is the deadline to propose actions (other than Director nominations) for theconsideration at next year’s annual meeting and incurred in connection with preparing for a potential contested solicitation of proxies will be $[                    ] in the aggregate, of which approximately $[          ] has been incurred to date.

26.What is the deadline to propose actions (other than Director nominations) for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders?

stockholders?

You may submit proposals for consideration at future stockholder meetings. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the annual meeting next year, the Corporate Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices no later than [     ].October 27, 2023. Such proposals also must comply with SEC regulations under Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. Proposals should be addressed to our Corporate Secretary at HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304.

For a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement for next year’s annual meeting under Rule 14a-8, the stockholder must provide the information required by our Bylaws and give timely notice to the Corporate Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by the Corporate Secretary:

not earlier than the close of business on [               ]; and
not later than the close of business on [               ].

not earlier than the close of business on December 26, 2023; and
not later than the close of business on January 25, 2024.
If the date of the stockholder meeting is moved more than 30 days before or 60 days after the anniversary of our annual meeting for the prior year, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 must be received no earlier than the close of business 120 days prior to the meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:

90 days prior to the meeting; and
10 days after public announcement of the meeting date.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT10 days after public announcement of the meeting date.87


Proxy Statement87
Other Matters


Table of Contents

Other Matters

Deadlines for the nomination of Director candidates are discussed in Question 2834 below.

27.

How may I recommend individuals to serve as Directors and what is the deadline for a Director recommendation?

33.How may I recommend individuals to serve as Directors and what is the deadline for a Director recommendation?
You may recommend Director candidates for consideration by the NGSR Committee. Any such recommendations should include verification of the stockholder status of the person submitting the recommendation and the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be directed to the Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive offices set forth in Question 26 above.HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304. See “—Identifying“Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Directors” above for more information regarding our Board membership criteria.

A stockholder may send a recommended Director candidate’s name and information to the Board at any time. Generally, such proposed candidates are considered at the first or second Board meeting prior to the issuance of the proxy statement for our annual meeting.

28.

How may I nominate individuals to serve as Directors and what are the deadlines for a Director nomination?

34.How may I nominate individuals to serve as Directors and what are the deadlines for a Director nomination?
Our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate Directors for consideration at an annual meeting. To nominate a Director for consideration at an annual meeting, a nominating stockholder must provide the information required by our Bylaws and give timely notice of the nomination to the Corporate Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws, and each nominee must meet the qualifications required by our Bylaws. To nominate a Director for consideration at next year’s annual meeting (but not for inclusion in our annual proxy statement), in general the notice must be received by the Corporate Secretary at HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304, between the close of business on [               ], 2020December 26, 2023 and the close of business on [                    ],January 25, 2024, unless the annual meeting is moved by more than 30 days before or 60 days after the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting, in which case the deadline will be as described in Question 2632 above.

In addition, our Bylaws provide that under certain circumstances, a stockholder or group of stockholders may seek to include Director candidates that they have nominated in our annual meeting proxy statement. These proxy access provisions of our Bylaws provide, among other things, that a stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders seeking to include Director candidates in our annual meeting proxy statement must own 3% or more of HP’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least the previous three years. The number of stockholder-nominated candidates appearing in any annual meeting proxy statement cannot exceed 20% of the number of Directors in office as of the last day on which a request to include a stockholder-nominated candidate may be delivered in accordance with our Bylaws. If 20% is not a whole number, the maximum number of stockholder-nominated candidates would be the closest whole number below 20%. Nominees submitted under the proxy access procedures that are later withdrawn or are included in the proxy materials as Board-nominated candidates will be counted in determining whether the 20% maximum has been reached. If the number of stockholder-nominated candidates exceeds 20%, each nominating stockholder or group of stockholders may select one nominee for inclusion in our proxy materials until the maximum number is reached. The order of selection would be determined by the amount (largest to smallest) of shares of HP common stock held by each nominating stockholder or group of stockholders. The nominating stockholder or group of stockholders also must deliver the information required by our Bylaws, and each nominee must meet the qualifications required by our Bylaws. Requests to include stockholder-nominated candidates in our proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting must be received by the Corporate Secretary:

not earlier than the close of business on [               ]; and
not later than the close of business on [               ].

29.

How may I obtain a copy of the provisions of our Bylaws regarding stockholder proposals and Director nominations?

Secretary at HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304:

not earlier than the close of business on November 26, 2023; and
not later than the close of business on December 26, 2023.
In addition, to comply with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, the SEC’s universal proxy rule, if a stockholder intends to solicit proxies in support of director nominees submitted under the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws for next year’s annual meeting, then such stockholder must provide proper written notice that sets forth all the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act to the Corporate Secretary at the address above by February 24, 2024 (or, if next year’s annual meeting is called for a date that is more than 30 days before or more than 30 days after the first anniversary of this year’s annual meeting, then notice must be provided not later than the close of business on the later of the 60th day prior to the date of the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by HP). The notice requirements under Rule 14a-19 are in addition to the applicable advance notice requirements under our Bylaws as described above.
35.How may I obtain a copy of the provisions of our Bylaws regarding stockholder proposals and Director nominations?
You may contact the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304, for a copy of the relevant Bylaws provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating Director candidates. Our Bylaws are also available on our investor relations website athttps://investor.hp.cominvestor.hp.com.
36..Who can help answer my questions?

30.

Will HP “household” its proxy materials?

SEC rules allow a single copy of the proxy materials to be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing the same address and last name, or who we reasonably believe are members of the same family and who consent to receive a single copy of these materials in a manner provided by these rules. This practice is referred to as “householding”.

88www.hpannualmeeting.com


Other Matters

Due to the contested nature of the solicitation, we do not intend to enable householding of our proxy materials this year to stockholders sharing an address. This means that stockholders who share an address will each be mailed a separate copy of the proxy materials.

If you are a stockholder of record who (i) has not already consented to receive a single copy of annual meeting proxy materials and would like to do so for uncontested annual meetings in the future or (ii) has previously consented to receive a single copy of annual meeting proxy materials (in the event “householding” is applicable) and would like to receive separate copies of these materials for uncontested annual meetings in the future, please contact our transfer agent, EQ Shareowner Services, at 1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101, Mendota Heights, MN 55120-4100 or by calling 1-800-286-5977 from the U.S. or Canada or 1-651-450-4064 from other countries.

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held through a broker, trustee, or other nominee and you wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials for future uncontested meetings or if you wish to receive one copy of these materials per household in the future, please contact your broker, trustee or other nominee.

Additional copies of our proxy materials are available upon request to our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, whose contact information is shown below. Please note however, that if you hold shares in “street name,” you must use the voting instruction form provided by your broker, trustee or other nominee to instruct your broker, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares on your behalf.

31.

Who can help answer my questions about the annual meeting?

If you have any questions about the annual meeting or how to vote or revoke your proxy, pleaseyou should contact our proxy solicitor:

Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20thFloor
New York, New York 10022
Stockholders: (877) 750-5838 (Toll-free from the U.S. and Canada)
or +1 (412) 232-3651 (from other countries)
Banks and brokers (call collect):
(212) 750-5833

solicitors:
Proxy Statement89


Table of Contents


HP Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

1.PURPOSE.
Alliance Advisors LLC
200 Broadacres Drive, 3rd Floor
Bloomfield, NJ 07003
(855) 796-2123
HPQ@allianceadvisors.com
The purpose of this Plan is to provide an opportunity for Employees of HP Inc. (the “Corporation”)
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
Stockholders: (877) 750-5838 (Toll-free from the U.S. and its Designated Affiliates to purchase Common Stock of the CorporationCanada)
(412) 232-3651 (International)
Banks and thereby to have an additional incentive to contribute to the prosperity of the Corporation. It is the intention of the Corporation that the Plan qualify as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, although the Corporation makes no undertaking nor representation to maintain such qualification. In addition, this Plan document authorizes the grant of options under a non-423 Plan which do not qualify under Section 423 of the Code pursuant to rules, procedures or sub-plans adopted by the Board (or its designate) designed to achieve desired tax or other objectives.brokers (call collect):
(212) 750-5833
88
logo_hp.jpg 

Forward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations and assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties. If the risks or uncertainties ever materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, they could affect the business and results of operations of HP and its consolidated subsidiaries which may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, any statements regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; projections of net revenue, margins, expenses, effective tax rates, net earnings, net earnings per share, cash flows, benefit plan funding, deferred taxes, share repurchases, foreign currency exchange rates or other financial items; any projections of the amount, timing or impact of cost savings or restructuring and other charges, planned structural cost reductions and productivity initiatives; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, including, but not limited to, our business model and transformation, our sustainability goals, our go-to-market strategy, the execution of restructuring plans and any resulting cost savings (including the fiscal 2023 plan), net revenue or profitability improvements or other financial impacts; any statements concerning the expected development, demand, performance, market share or competitive performance relating to products or services; any statements concerning potential supply constraints, component shortages, manufacturing disruptions or logistics challenges; any statements regarding current or future macroeconomic trends or events and the impact of those trends and events on HP and its financial performance; any statements regarding pending investigations, claims, disputes or other litigation matters; any statements of expectation or belief as to the timing and expected benefits of acquisitions and other business combination and investment transactions (including the recent acquisition of Poly); and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements can also generally be identified by words such as “future,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “projects,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can,” “may,” and similar terms. Risks, uncertainties and assumptions include the factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of HP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022 and that are otherwise described or updated from time to time in HP’s other filings with the SEC. The forward-looking statements in this report are made as of the date of this filing and HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking and other statements in this report may also address our corporate sustainability or responsibility progress, plans, and goals (including environmental matters), and the inclusion of such statements is not an indication that these contents are necessarily material to investors or required to be disclosed in HP’s filings with the SEC. In addition, historical, current, and forward-looking sustainability-related statements may be based on standards for measuring progress that are still developing, internal controls and processes that continue to evolve, and assumptions that are subject to change in the future.
2.2023 PROXY STATEMENTDEFINITIONS.89

(a)“Affiliate”shall mean any (i) Subsidiary and (ii) any other entity other than the Corporation in an unbroken chain of entities beginning with the Corporation if, at the time of the granting of the option, each of the entities, other than the last entity in the unbroken chain, owns or controls 50 percent or more of the total ownership interest in one of the other entities in such chain.
(b)
Reconciliation of GAAP Measures to
Non-GAAP Measures
In this proxy statement, HP discloses the following non-GAAP financial measures:
Non-GAAP operating profit: Non-GAAP operating profit is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as GAAP operating profit, exclusive of costs related to restructuring and other charges, acquisition and divestiture charges, amortization of intangible assets and Russia exit charges. Management uses non-GAAP operating profit to evaluate and forecast our performance before gains, losses, or other charges that are considered by management to be outside of our core business segment operating results. We believe that presenting non-GAAP operating profit provides investors with greater visibility with respect to the information used by management in its financial and operational decision making. We further believe that providing this additional non-GAAP information helps investors understand our operating performance and evaluate the efficacy of the methodology and information used by management to evaluate and measure such performance. This additional non-GAAP information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP operating profit.
Non-GAAP free cash flow: Non-GAAP free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as net cash provided by operating activities adjusted for net investments in leases and net investments in property, plant and equipment. HP’s management uses non-GAAP free cash flow for the purpose of determining the amount of cash available for investment in HP’s businesses, repurchasing stock and other purposes. HP’s management also uses non-GAAP free cash flow to evaluate HP’s historical and prospective liquidity. This additional non-GAAP information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net cash provided by operating activities.
“Board”shall mean the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
(c)Twelve months ended
(in millions)“Code”shall mean the Internal Revenue CodeOctober 31, 2022
GAAP operating profit$4,676 
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Restructuring and other charges233 
Acquisition and divestiture charges318 
Amortization of 1986, of the USA, as amended. Any reference to a section of the Code herein shall be a reference to any successor or amended section of the Code.intangible assets228 
Russia exit charges23 
Non-GAAP operating profit$5,478 
(d)“Code Section 423 Plan”shall mean an employee stock purchase plan which is designed to meet the requirements set forth in Code Section 423.Twelve months ended
(in millions)(e)“Committee”shall mean the committee appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 14 of the Plan.October 31, 2022
(f)“Common Stock”shall mean the Common Stock of the Corporation, or any stock into which such Common Stock may be converted.
(g)“Compensation”shall mean an Employee’s baseGAAP net cash compensation, commissions and shift premiums paid on account of personal services rendered by the Employee to the Corporation or a Designated Affiliate, but shall exclude payments for overtime, incentive compensation, incentive payments and bonuses, with any modifications determined by the Committee. The Committee shall have the authority to determine and approve all forms of pay to be included in the definition of Compensation and may change the definition on a prospective basis.
(h)“Contributions”shall mean the payroll deductions (to the extent permitted under applicable local law) and other additional payments that the Corporation may allow to be made by a Participant to fund the exercise of options granted pursuant to the Plan if payroll deductions are not permitted under applicable local law.
(i)“Corporation”shall mean HP Inc., a Delaware corporation.
(j)“Designated Affiliate”shall mean an Affiliate that has been designated by the Committee as eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to its Employees. In the event the Designated Affiliate is not a Subsidiary, it shall be designated for participation in the Non-423 Plan.
(k)“Employee”shall mean an individual classified as an employee (within the meaning of Code Section 3401(c) and the regulations thereunder or as otherwise determined under applicable local law) by the Corporation or a Designated Affiliate on the Corporation’s or such Designated Affiliate’s payroll records during the relevant participation period. Employees shall not include individuals whose customary employment is for not more than five (5) months in any calendar year (except those Employees in such category the exclusion of whom is not permitted under applicable local law) or individuals classified as independent contractors.
(l)“Entry Date”shall mean the first Trading Day of the Offering Period.
90www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex A: HP Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

(m)“Fair Market Value”shall be the closing sales price for the Common Stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of determination if that date is a Trading Day, or if the date of determination is not a Trading Day, the last market Trading Day prior to the date of determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Committee deems reliable.
(n)“Non-423 Plan”shall mean an employee stock purchase plan which does not meet the requirements set forth in Code Section 423.
(o)“Offering Period”shall mean the period of six (6) months during which an option granted pursuant to the Plan may be exercised, commencing on the first Trading Day on or after May 1 and November 1, respectively. The duration and timing of Offering Periods may be changed or modified by the Committee.
(p)“Participant”shall mean a participant in the Plan as described in Section 5 of the Plan.
(q)“Plan”shall mean this Employee Stock Purchase Plan which includes: (i) a Code Section 423 Plan and (ii) a Non-423 Plan.
(r)“Purchase Date”shall mean the last Trading Day of each Offering Period.
(s)“Purchase Price”shall mean 95% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Purchase Date; provided however, that the Purchase Price may be adjusted by the Committee pursuant to Section 7.4.
(t)“Shareowner”shall mean a record holder of shares entitled to vote shares of Common Stock under the Corporation’s by-laws.
(u)“Subsidiary”shall mean any corporation (other than the Corporation) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Corporation, as described in Code Section 424(f).
(v)“Trading Day”shall mean a day on which U.S. national stock exchanges and the national market system are open for trading.
3.ELIGIBILITY.
Any Employee regularly employed on a full-time or part-time (20 hours or more per week on a regular schedule) basis, or on any other basis as determined by the Corporation (if required under applicable local law) for purposes of the Non-423 Plan or any separate offering under the Code Section 423 Plan, by the Corporation or by any Designated Affiliate on an Entry Date shall be eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to the Offering Period commencing on such Entry Date, provided that the Committee may establish administrative rules requiring that employment commence some minimum period (e.g., one pay period) prior to an Entry Date to be eligible to participate with respect to the Offering Period beginning on that Entry Date. The Committee may also determine that a designated group of highly compensated Employees are ineligible to participate in the Plan so long as the excluded category fits within the definition of “highly compensated employee” in Code Section 414(q). No Employee may participate in the Plan if immediately after an option is granted the Employee owns or is considered to own (within the meaning of Code Section 424(d)) shares of stock, including stock which the Employee may purchase by conversion of convertible securities or under outstanding options granted by the Corporation, possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Corporation or of any of its Subsidiaries. All Employees who participate in the same offering under the Plan shall have the same rights and privileges under such offering, except for differences that may be needed to facilitate compliance with applicable local law, as determined by the Corporation and that are consistent with Code Section 423(b)(5); provided, however, that Employees participating in the Non-423 Plan by means of rules, procedures or sub-plans adopted pursuant to Section 15 need not have the same rights and privileges as Employees participating in the Code Section 423 Plan. The Board may impose restrictions on eligibility and participation of Employees who are officers and directors to facilitate compliance with federal or state securities laws or foreign laws.
4.OFFERING PERIODS.
The Plan shall be implemented by consecutive Offering Periods with a new Offering Period commencing on the first Trading Day on or after May 1 and November 1 of each year, or on such other date as the Committee shall determine, and continuing thereafter for six (6) months or until terminated pursuant to Section 13 hereof. The Committee shall have the authority to change the duration of Offering Periods (including the commencement dates thereof) with respect to future offerings without Shareowner approval if such change is announced at least five (5) days prior to the scheduled beginning of the first Offering Period to be affected thereafter; provided, however, that the Committee shall not change the duration of an Offering Period to be in excess of twenty-seven (27) months without prior Shareowner approval.
5.PARTICIPATION.
5.1An Employee who is eligible to participate in the Plan in accordance with Section 3 may become a Participant by completing and submitting, on a date prescribed by the Committee prior to an applicable Entry Date, a completed payroll deduction authorization or, if applicable local law prohibits payroll deductions for the purpose of the Plan, other authorization stating the amount of Contributions to the Plan expressed as any whole percentage up to ten percent (10%) of the eligible Employee’s Compensation and Plan enrollment
Proxy Statement91


Table of Contents

Annex A: HP Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

form provided by the Corporation or by following an electronic or other enrollment process as prescribed by the Committee. Where applicable local law prohibits payroll deductions for the purpose of the Plan, the Corporation may permit a Participant to contribute amounts to the Plan through payment by cash, check or other means set forth in the Plan enrollment form prior to each Purchase Date of each Offering Period. An eligible Employee may authorize Contributions at the rate of any whole percentage of the Employee’s Compensation, not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Employee’s Compensation. All payroll deductions may be held by the Corporation and commingled with its other corporate funds where administratively appropriate, except where applicable local law requires that Contributions to the Plan from Participants be segregated from the general corporate funds and/or deposited with an independent third party. No interest shall be paid or credited to the Participant with respect to such Contributions, unless required by local law. The Corporation shall maintain a separate bookkeeping account for each Participant under the Plan and the amount of each Participant’s Contributions shall be credited to such account. A Participant may not make any additional payments into such account.operating activities
5.2$Under procedures established by the Committee, a Participant may withdraw from the Plan during an Offering Period, by completing and filing a new payroll deduction authorization or, if applicable local law prohibits payroll deductions for the purpose of the Plan, other Contribution authorization and Plan enrollment form with the Corporation or by following electronic or other procedures prescribed by the Committee, prior to the change enrollment deadline established by the Corporation. If a Participant withdraws from the Plan during an Offering Period, his or her accumulated Contributions will be refunded to the Participant without interest. The Committee may establish rules limiting the frequency with which Participants may withdraw and re-enroll in the Plan and may impose a waiting period on Participants wishing to re-enroll following withdrawal.
5.3A Participant may change his or her rate of Contributions at any time by filing a new payroll deduction authorization or, if applicable local law prohibits payroll deductions for the purpose of the Plan, other authorization stating the amount of Contributions to the Plan expressed as any whole percentage up to ten percent (10%) of the eligible Employee’s Compensation and Plan enrollment form or by following electronic or other procedures prescribed by the Committee. If a Participant has not followed such procedures to change the rate of Contributions, the rate of Contributions shall continue at the originally elected rate throughout the Offering Period and future Offering Periods. In accordance with Section 423(b)(8) of the Code, the Committee may reduce a Participant’s Contributions to zero percent (0%) at any time during an Offering Period.
6.TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT.
In the event any Participant terminates employment with the Corporation or any of its Designated Affiliates for any reason (including death) prior to the expiration of an Offering Period, the Participant’s participation in the Plan shall terminate and all amounts credited to the Participant’s account shall be paid to the Participant or, in the case of death, to the Participant’s heirs or estate, without interest. Whether a termination of employment has occurred shall be determined by the Committee. The Committee may also establish rules regarding when leaves of absence or changes of employment status will be considered to be a termination of employment, including rules regarding transfer of employment among Designated Affiliates, Affiliates and the Corporation, and the Committee may establish termination-of-employment procedures for this Plan that are independent of similar rules established under other benefit plans of the Corporation and its Affiliates.
7.OFFERING.
7.1Subject to adjustment as set forth in Section 10, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan shall be fifty million (50,000,000). If, on a given Purchase Date, the number of shares with respect to which options are to be exercised exceeds the number of shares then available under the Plan, the Corporation shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares remaining available for purchase in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall determine to be equitable.
7.2Each Offering Period shall be determined by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Plan will operate with successive six (6) month Offering Periods commencing at the beginning of each fiscal year half. The Committee shall have the power to change the duration of future Offering Periods, without Shareowner approval, and without regard to the expectations of any Participants.
7.3Each eligible Employee who has elected to participate as provided in Section 5.1 shall be granted an option to purchase that number of shares of Common Stock (not to exceed 5,000 shares, subject to adjustment under Section 10 of the Plan) which may be purchased with the Contributions accumulated on behalf of such Employee during each Offering Period at the Purchase Price specified in Section 7.4 below, subject to the additional limitation that no Employee shall be granted an option to purchase Common Stock under the Plan at a rate which exceeds U.S. twenty-five thousand dollars (U.S. $25,000) of the Fair Market Value of such Common Stock (determined at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time. For purposes of the Plan, an option is “granted” on a Participant’s Entry Date. An option will expire upon the earlier to occur of (i) the termination of a Participant’s participation in the Plan; or (ii) the termination of an Offering Period. This section shall be interpreted so as to comply with Code Section 423(b)(8).
92www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex A: HP Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

7.4The Purchase Price under each option shall be a percentage (not less than eighty-five percent (85%)) established by the Committee (“Designated Percentage”) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Purchase Date on which the Common Stock is purchased. The Committee may change the Designated Percentage with respect to any future Offering Period, but not below eighty-five percent (85%), and the Committee may determine with respect to any prospective Offering Period that the option price shall be the Designated Percentage of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Purchase Date.
7.5For purposes of the Code Section 423 Plan only, and unless the Committee otherwise determines, each Designated Affiliate shall be deemed to participate in a separate offering from the Corporation or any other Designated Affiliate, provided that the terms of participation within any such offering are the same for all Participants in such offering, as determined under Code Section 423.
4,463 
8.Non-GAAP adjustments:PURCHASE OF STOCK.
Net investments in property, plant and equipmentUpon the expiration of each Offering Period, a Participant’s option shall be exercised automatically for the purchase of that number of whole shares of Common Stock which the accumulated Contributions credited to the Participant’s account at that time shall purchase at the applicable Purchase Price. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation or its designee may make such provisions and take such action as it deems necessary or appropriate for the withholding of taxes and/or social insurance contributions which the Corporation or its Designated Affiliate is required or permitted by applicable law or regulation of any governmental authority to withhold. Each Participant, however, shall be responsible for payment of all individual tax and social insurance contribution liabilities arising under the Plan.(765)
9.Net investments in leasesPAYMENT AND DELIVERY.155 
Non-GAAP free cash flowAs soon as practicable after the exercise of an option, the Corporation shall deliver to the Participant a record of the Common Stock purchased and the balance of any amount of Contributions credited to the Participant’s account not used for the purchase, except as specified below. The Committee may permit or require that shares be deposited directly with a broker designated by the Committee or to a designated agent of the Corporation, and the Committee may utilize electronic or automated methods of share transfer. The Committee may require that shares be retained with such broker or agent for a designated period of time and/or may establish other procedures to permit tracking of disqualifying dispositions of such shares. The Corporation shall retain the amount of payroll deductions used to purchase Common Stock as full payment for the Common Stock and the Common Stock shall then be fully paid and non-assessable. No Participant shall have any voting, dividend, or other Shareowner rights with respect to shares subject to any option granted under the Plan until the shares subject to the option have been purchased and delivered to the Participant as provided in this Section 9.$3,853 
10.90RECAPITALIZATION.

If after the grant of an option, but prior to the purchase of Common Stock under the option, there is any increase or decrease in the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock because of a stock split, stock dividend, combination or recapitalization of shares subject to options, the number of shares to be purchased pursuant to an option, the price per share of Common Stock covered by an option and the maximum number of shares specified in Section 7.1 may be appropriately adjusted by the Board, and the Board shall take any further actions which, in the exercise of its discretion, may be necessary or appropriate under the circumstances.

The Board’s determinations under this Section 10 shall be conclusive and binding on all parties.

11.MERGER, LIQUIDATION, OTHER CORPORATION TRANSACTIONS.

In the event of the proposed liquidation or dissolution of the Corporation, the Offering Period will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed transaction, unless otherwise provided by the Board in its sole discretion, and all outstanding options shall automatically terminate and the amounts of all payroll deductions will be refunded without interest (except as may be required by applicable local law, as determined by the Corporation) to the Participants.

In the event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation, or the merger or consolidation of the Corporation with or into another corporation, then in the sole discretion of the Board, (1) each option shall be assumed or an equivalent option shall be substituted by the successor corporation or parent or subsidiary of such successor corporation, (2) a date established by the Board on or before the date of consummation of such merger, consolidation or sale shall be treated as a Purchase Date, and all outstanding options shall be exercised on such date, or (3) all outstanding options shall terminate and the accumulated Contributions will be refunded without interest to the Participants.

logo_hp.jpg 
Proxy Statement93


TableSignature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLYTHIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. ! !! 3 Years1 Year 2 Years Abstain D97021-P85623 Stockholder Proposal 4. To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of Contents

Annex A:future votes to approve, on an advisory basis, HP Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

12.TRANSFERABILITY.
Options granted to Participants may not be voluntarily or involuntarily assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise disposed of in any way,and any attempted assignment, transfer, pledge, or other disposition shall be null and void and without effect. If a Participant in any mannerattempts to transfer, assign or otherwise encumber his or her rights or interests under the Plan, other than as set forth in Section 22 andas permitted by the Code, such act shall be treated as an election by the Participant to discontinue participation in the Plan pursuant toSection 5.2.
13.AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN.
13.1The Plan shall continue until May 1, 2031 unless otherwise terminated in accordance with Section 13.2.
13.2's named executive officer compensation 3. To approve, on an advisory basis, HP Inc.'s named executive officer compensation The Board may, in its sole discretion, insofar as permitted by law, terminate or suspend the Plan, or revise or amend it in any respect Whatsoever, except that, without approval of the Shareowners, no such revision or amendment shall increase the number of shares subject to the Plan, other than an adjustment under Section 10 of the Plan.
14.ADMINISTRATION.
The Board shall appoint a Committee consisting of at least two members who will serve for such period of time as the Board may specify and whom the Board may remove at any time. The Committee will have the authority and responsibility for the day-to-day administration of the Plan, the authority and responsibility specifically provided in this Plan and any additional duty, responsibility and authority delegated to the Committee by the Board, which may include any of the functions assigned to the Board in this Plan. The Committee may delegate to one or more individuals the day-to-day administration of the Plan. The Committee shall have full power and authority to promulgate any rules and regulations which it deems necessary for the proper administration of the Plan, to interpret the provisions and supervise the administration of the Plan, to make factual determinations relevant to Plan entitlements and to take all action in connection with administration of the Plan as it deems necessary or advisable, consistent with the delegation from the Board. Decisions of the Board and the Committee shall be final and binding upon all participants. Any decision reduced to writing and signed by a majority of the members of the Committee shall be fully effective as if it had been made at a meeting of the Committee duly held. The Corporation shall pay all expenses incurred in the administration of the Plan. No Board or Committee member shall be liable for any action or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any option granted hereunder.
15.COMMITTEE RULES FOR FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS AND THE NON-423 PLAN.
15.1The Committee may adopt rules or procedures relating to the operation and administration of the Plan to accommodate the specific requirements of local laws and procedures. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee is specifically authorized to adopt rules and procedures regarding handling of Contributions, payment of interest, conversion of local currency, payroll tax, withholding procedures and handling of stock certificates which vary with local legal requirements.
15.2The Committee may also adopt rules, procedures or sub-plans applicable to particular Affiliates or locations, which rules, procedures or sub-plans may be designed to be outside the scope of Code Section 423. The terms of such rules, procedures or sub-plans may take precedence over other provisions of this Plan, with the exception of Section 7.1, but unless otherwise expressly superseded by the terms of such rule, procedure or sub-plan, the provisions of this Plan shall govern the operation of the Plan. To the extent inconsistent with the requirements of Code Section 423, such rules, procedures or sub-plans shall be considered part of the Non-423 Plan, and the options granted thereunder shall not be considered to comply with Section 423.
16.SECURITIES LAWS REQUIREMENTS.
The Corporation shall not be under any obligation to issue Common Stock upon the exercise of any option unless and until the Corporation has determined that: (i) it and the Participant have taken all actions required to register the Common Stock under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder or to perfect an exemption from the registration requirements thereof; (ii) any applicable listing requirement of any stock exchange on which the Common Stock is listed has been satisfied; and (iii) all other applicable provisions of state, federal and applicable foreign law have been satisfied.
17.GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS.
This Plan and the Corporation’s obligation to sell and deliver shares of its stock under the Plan shall be subject to the approval of any governmental authority required in connection with the Plan or the authorization, issuance, sale, or delivery of stock hereunder.
94www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex A:Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal: 2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as HP Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

18.NO ENLARGEMENT OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS.
Nothing contained in this Plan shall be deemed to give any Employee the right to be retained in the employ or service of the Corporation or any Designated Affiliate or to interfere with the right of the Corporation or Designated Affiliate to discharge any Employee at any time.
19.GOVERNING LAW.
This Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, U.S.A., without regard to that State’s choice of law rules.
20.EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Plan shall be effective May 1, 2021, subject to approval of the Shareowners of the Corporation within 12 months before or after its adoption by the Board.
21.REPORTS.
Individual accounts shall be maintained's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2023 The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST the following proposal: The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each Participant in the Plan. Statements of account shall be given to Participants at least annually, which statements shall set forth the amounts of Contributions, the Purchase Price, the number of shares purchased and the remaining cash balance, if any.
22.DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY FOR OWNED SHARES.

With respect to shares of Common Stock purchased by the Participant pursuant to the Plan and held in an account maintained by the Corporation or its assignee on the Participant’s behalf, the Participant may be permitted to file a written designation of beneficiary. The Participant may change such designation of beneficiary at any time by written notice. Subject to applicable local legal requirements, in the event of a Participant’s death, the Corporation or its assignee shall deliver such shares of Common Stock to the designated beneficiary.

Subject to applicable local law, in the event of the death of a Participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated who is living at the time of such Participant’s death, the Corporation shall deliver such shares of Common Stock to the executor or administrator of the estate of the Participant, or if no such executor or administrator has been appointed (to the knowledge of the Corporation), the Corporation in its sole discretion, may deliver (or cause its assignee to deliver) such shares of Common Stock to the spouse, dependent or relative of the Participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known to the Corporation, then to such other person as the Corporation may determine.

Proxy Statement95


Table of Contents

The following tables (“Directors and Nominees” and “Executive Officers and Other Employees”) set forth the name and business address of our current Directors and Director nominees, and the name, present principal occupation and business address of our executive officers and employees who, under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, are consideredfollowing proposals: 5. Stockholder proposal requesting stockholders' right to be participants in our solicitation of proxies from our stockholders in connection with our annual meeting (collectively, the “Participants”).

Directors and Nominees

The principal occupations of our current Directors and Director nominees, other than Mr. Weisler, who is not standing for re-electionact by written consent, if properly presented at the annual meeting are set forth under “Board of Directors – Who We Are”, which begins on page 15 of this proxy statement. The names of our current Directors and Director nominees are set forth below, andNOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the business address for all of our current Directors and Director nominees is c/omeeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! For Against Abstain ! !! HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304.

Name
Aida M. Alvarez
Shumeet Banerji
Robert R. Bennett
Charles “Chip” V. Bergh
Stacy Brown-Philpot
Stephanie A. Burns
Mary Anne Citrino
Richard L. Clemmer
Yoky Matsuoka
Stacey Mobley
Subra Suresh
Dion Weisler1
(1)Mr. Weisler served as President and CEO of HP until November 1, 2019, and continues to be employed by HP as Senior Executive Advisor, a non-executive officer role. Mr. Weisler is not standing for re-election at this annual meeting.

96www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Executive Officers and Other Employees

The principal occupations of our executive officers and other employees who are considered Participants are set forth below. The principal occupation refers toINC. 1. To elect each such person’s current position with the Company, and the business address for each person is c/o HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304.

NamePosition
Daniel AmirDirector, Investor Relations
Elaine BeddomeGlobal Head of HP Compensation, Benefits & Employee Mobility
Claire BramleyGlobal Controller
Alex ChoPresident, Personal Systems
Katie ColendichAssociate General Counsel, Corporate, Securities & M&A
Jeff DahnckeHead of Corporate Communications
Pretesh DahyaDirector, Investor Relations
Steve FielerChief Financial Officer
Beth HoweVice President, Head of Investor Relations
Karen KahnChief Communications Officer
Tracy S. KeoghChief Human Resources Officer
Enrique LoresPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Zac NesperTreasurer
Kim RiveraPresident, Strategy and Business Management and Chief Legal Officer
Ruairidh RossGlobal Head of Strategic Legal Matters and Assistant Corporate Secretary
Christoph SchellChief Commercial Officer
Tuan TranPresident of Imaging, Printing and Solutions

Information Regarding Ownership of Company Securities by Participants

The amount of shares beneficially owned by our Directors, our Director nominees and our named executive officers as of December 31, 2019 is set forth under “Ownership of Our Stock” on page 75 of this proxy statement. The following table sets forth the number of shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2019 by our other executive officers and employees who are deemed “Participants” in our solicitation of proxies. Beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the entity or individual has sole or shared voting or investment power and also any shares that the entity or individual has the right to acquire as of March 1, 2020 (60 days after December 31, 2019) through the exercise of any stock options, through the vesting/settlement of RSUs payable in shares, or upon the exercise of other rights. Beneficial ownership excludes options or other rights vesting after March 1, 2020 and any RSUs vesting/settling, as applicable, on or before March 1, 2020 that may be payable in cash or shares at HP’s election.

Name of ParticipantShares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Daniel Amir0
Elaine Beddome111,359
Claire Bramley16,611
Katie Colendich0
Jeff Dahncke18,961
Pretesh Dahya422
Beth Howe7,116
Karen Kahn31,378
Tracy S. Keogh708,097
Zac Nesper1
Ruairidh Ross32,793
Christoph Schell59,785
Tuan Tran102,738

Proxy Statement97


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Information Regarding Transactions in Company Securities by Participants

The following table sets forth information regarding transactions in HP securities by each Participant during the past two years. None of the purchase price or market value of these securities is represented by funds borrowed or otherwise obtained for the purpose of acquiring or holding such securities.

Transactions in Company Securities (February 1, 2018, 2020 to February 15, 2020)

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
Directors and Nominees
Aida M. AlvarezApril 23, 201910,7023
April 24, 20189,6703
Shumeet BanerjiJune 10, 201928,0001
April 23, 201910,7023
May 18, 201810,9395
April 24, 20189,6703
Robert R. BennettApril 23, 201910,7026
May 18, 201810,9395
April 24, 20189,6703
Charles “Chip” V. BerghApril 23, 20197,9656
April 23, 201938,9304
April 24, 20187,3126
April 24, 201832,5644
Stacy Brown-PhilpotApril 23, 201910,7026
April 24, 20189,6706
Stephanie A. BurnsApril 23, 201910,7026
May 18, 201810,9395
April 24, 20189,6706
Mary Anne CitrinoApril 23, 20195,3516
April 23, 201926,1564
April 24, 20184,8356
April 24, 201821,5344
Richard L. ClemmerN/AN/AN/A
Yoky MatsuokaApril 23, 201915,9293
March 20, 20191,2093
Stacey MobleyApril 23, 201910,7026
April 24, 20189,6706
Subra SureshApril 23, 201910,7023
May 18, 201810,9395
April 24, 20189,6703

98www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
Dion WeislerDecember 7, 2019285,3889
December 7, 2019141,49711
November 13, 2019434,43210
November 13, 2019207,84211
August 26, 2019437,1711
June 27, 2019132,9641
March 18, 201936,7991
December 11, 2018116,1341
December 9, 2018144,4999
December 9, 201871,64411
December 7, 2018192,4409
December 7, 201895,41411
December 7, 2018252,9447
December 7, 2018348,7608
November 26, 2018646,88310
November 26, 2018320,72511
November 7, 201878,9901
November 6, 20187,3991
November 2, 2018171,3419
November 2, 201877,67511
October 31, 2018101,66610
October 31, 201844,40011
Executive Officers and Other Employees
Daniel AmirDecember 6, 20192,6347
August 24, 20197,0197
Elaine BeddomeDecember 7, 201919,8829
December 7, 20194,40311
December 6, 201920,7327
November 1, 201933,7492
October 31, 20191,2509
October 31, 201997111
October 17, 20199819
October 17, 201921811
December 9, 20187,5279
December 9, 20182,80111
December 7, 201813,1039
December 7, 20183,54311
December 7, 201818,5357
November 2, 20183,2959
November 2, 201880311
October 31, 20181,2149
October 31, 201826911
October 17, 20189529
October 17, 201821111
July 9, 201847,65312
July 9, 201847,6531

Proxy Statement99


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
Claire BramleyDecember 7, 201932,9539
December 7, 201916,34211
December 6, 201939,0247
June 26, 201914,46312
June 26, 201916,8521
June 20, 20193,6539
June 20, 20191,26411
June 10, 201915,8191
December 9, 20186,0209
December 9, 20182,57311
December 7, 201813,0479
December 7, 20185,57711
December 7, 201856,6947
November 2, 20185,2729
November 2, 201837011
September 13, 201810,0201
June 20, 201810,7307
March 9, 201816,62512
March 9, 201824,9941
Alex ChoDecember 10, 201922,0181
December 7, 201961,2729
December 7, 201927,15111
December 6, 2019131,1998
December 6, 201993,6597
November 13, 201915,66210
November 13, 20195,41611
July 1, 201912,0039
July 1, 20194,15111
December 14, 201828,7741
December 9, 201813,5479
December 9, 20186,71811
December 7, 201836,1549
December 7, 201814,20911
December 7, 201869,7787
December 7, 201896,2108
December 3, 20183,8791
November 2, 20185,9319
November 2, 20182,05211
July 1, 201835,2587
July 1, 201846,9568

100www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
Katie ColendichDecember 11, 201910,1511
December 7, 201915,5229
December 7, 20195,37111
December 6, 201912,5867
March 19, 20191,5671
March 11, 20191,0001
March 7, 20191,0001
January 14, 20194,2789
January 14, 20191,71111
December 28, 20182,3851
December 27, 20183,2291
December 17, 20182,0001
December 11, 20181,8751
December 9, 20185,0559
December 9, 20181,74911
December 7, 201810,9829
December 7, 20183,79911
December 7, 201812,2117
February 26, 20182,5081
Jeff DahnckeDecember 7, 20192,7019
December 7, 201993511
December 6, 201912,1957
October 31, 201917,2732
October 17, 201913,0749
October 17, 20194,52211
December 7, 20187,8507
October 17, 201812,6789
October 17, 20184,38511
Pretesh DahyaJanuary 31, 20202419
January 31, 20209711
December 12, 20191,0001
December 7, 20191,9599
December 7, 201968111
December 6, 20193,0687
December 5, 20193931
September 21, 20195959
September 21, 201920211
June 13, 20191391
January 31, 20192349
January 31, 20199511
December 26, 20187071
December 18, 20186001
December 9, 20188289
December 9, 201828711
December 7, 20181,1739
December 7, 201840711

Proxy Statement101


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
December 7, 20182,1817
September 21, 20181,7427
June 26, 20181,2251
Steve FielerJanuary 11, 202016,9699
January 11, 20208,41411
January 3, 2020182,9249
January 3, 202083,72211
December 7, 201936,6029
December 7, 201918,14911
December 6, 2019157,1658
December 6, 2019112,1957
November 13, 201915,66210
November 13, 20197,76611
July 1, 201912,0039
July 1, 20195,95211
January 11, 201916,4599
January 11, 20198,16111
January 3, 2019177,4069
January 3, 201980,76011
December 7, 201812,2149
December 7, 20186,05711
December 7, 201869,7787
December 7, 201896,2108
July 1, 201835,2587
July 1, 201846,9568
March 9, 201818,7001
March 6, 201820,0001
March 5, 201820,0001
February 28, 201820,0001
February 26, 201820,0001
Beth HoweFebruary 10, 20207331
January 23, 20209,0507
December 7, 201910,8859
December 7, 20193,76911
December 6, 201910,9767
October 29, 20191,1229
October 29, 201938911
June 19, 20199,9751
April 21, 20191599
April 21, 20196411
December 9, 20184,9689
December 9, 20181,71911
December 7, 20187,5049
December 7, 20182,59711
December 7, 20189,1587
November 2, 20182,6369

102www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
November 2, 201891211
October 29, 20183,2587
April 21, 20184647
Karen KahnDecember 7, 201934,0549
December 7, 201911,77711
December 6, 201953,6597
December 6, 201975,8038
September 27, 201953,9727
September 1, 201913,9139
September 1, 20194,81211
March 28, 20196021
March 20, 20199939
March 20, 201939111
December 9, 201815,0529
December 9, 20187,46411
December 8, 201853,8329
December 8, 201823,06911
December 7, 201818,4809
December 7, 20186,39111
December 7, 201843,6117
December 7, 201864,9348
September 1, 201840,5687
March 20, 20189709
March 20, 201838911
Tracy S. KeoghDecember 7, 201969,0969
December 7, 201934,26111
December 6, 2019109,3328
December 6, 201978,0497
November 13, 2019105,19510
November 13, 201944,61611
December 10, 201832,2599
December 10, 201815,99511
December 9, 201834,9219
December 9, 201817,31411
December 7, 201861,0557
December 7, 201884,1838
December 7, 201846,6549
December 7, 201823,13211
November 26, 2018156,33110
November 26, 201877,51011
November 2, 201838,2229
November 2, 201818,95111
October 31, 201824,56910
October 31, 201812,18211
June 11, 2018117,27512
June 11, 2018117,2751

Proxy Statement103


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
June 6, 201896,9261
June 5, 2018117,27612
June 5, 2018117,2761
Enrique LoresDecember 7, 2019101,1469
December 7, 201950,15011
December 6, 2019300,6648
December 6, 2019214,6347
November 13, 2019142,88410
November 13, 201963,30211
December 9, 201842,1469
December 9, 201820,89711
December 7, 201865,2289
December 7, 201832,34111
December 7, 201898,5617
December 7, 2018135,8968
November 26, 2018192,95710
November 26, 201895,66911
October 31, 201831,77010
October 31, 201815,75211
October 30, 201851,1619
October 30, 201825,36711
March 18, 2018118,6719
March 18, 201858,83811
March 9, 2018265,07612
March 9, 2018302,8951
January 18, 2018211,58912
January 18, 2018249,4091
January 17, 201853,48412
January 17, 201853,4841
January 12, 201837,8201
Zac NesperDecember 16, 201911,6211
December 7, 201917,7719
December 7, 20196,15011
December 6, 201922,6837
November 15, 20191,5501
November 8, 20192,3719
November 8, 201982111
September 20, 20191,39412
September 20, 20191,3941
September 3, 20191,8441
August 27, 20192,8209
August 27, 201997611
July 31, 20197,1297
June 3, 20191,20012
June 3, 20191,2001
December 18, 20183,1961
December 11, 20187,0291

104www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
December 9, 20184,2159
December 9, 20181,45811
December 7, 201811,4189
December 7, 20183,95011
December 7, 201817,4447
November 12, 20181,5051
November 8, 20182,3029
November 8, 201879711
August 27, 20188,2207
Kim RiveraDecember 7, 201976,8539
December 7, 201938,10611
December 6, 2019143,4998
December 6, 2019102,4397
November 13, 2019101,43910
November 13, 201942,86211
June 19, 201920,0001
December 9, 201831,3099
December 9, 201815,52411
December 7, 201845,4459
December 7, 201822,53311
December 7, 201887,2227
December 7, 2018120,2628
November 26, 2018142,72610
November 26, 201870,76511
November 14, 201846,0721
November 9, 201886,7389
November 9, 201840,66611
October 31, 201823,29810
October 31, 20188,05711
Ruairidh RossDecember 7, 201925,8799
December 7, 20198,97411
December 6, 201924,3907
October 31, 201928,7857
June 27, 201917,2291
January 14, 201925,6719
January 14, 20198,44211
December 9, 20187,2259
December 9, 20183,42811
December 7, 201814,1909
December 7, 20187,83511
December 7, 201832,7087
September 7, 201821,6511
September 6, 20189,2721
June 16, 201812,3939
June 16, 20184,01911
March 8, 20187,0001
February 27, 20188,7341

Proxy Statement105


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
Christoph SchellDecember 10, 201942,8041
December 7, 201984,8999
December 7, 201942,09511
December 6, 2019157,1658
December 6, 2019112,1957
November 15, 201960,1211
November 13, 2019119,24410
November 13, 201959,12311
July 25, 2019468,8237
May 4, 201978,9789
May 4, 201847,17911
December 11, 201845,0621
December 9, 201836,1259
December 9, 201817,91211
December 7, 201853,2539
December 7, 201826,40411
December 7, 201887,2227
December 7, 2018129,8688
December 3, 2018101,7091
November 26, 2018166,00210
November 26, 201882,30511
November 7, 2018126,72512
November 7, 2018148,5911
November 2, 201839,5419
November 2, 201817,67511
October 31, 201827,53410
October 31, 20189,52211
May 4, 2018230,6277
Tuan TranDecember 7, 201948,2459
December 7, 201912,76711
December 6, 2019122,9998
December 6, 201987,8057
October 31, 20193,7509
October 31, 201991411
April 30, 20191,02113
December 11, 201833,2191
December 9, 201821,0739
December 9, 20188,29311
December 7, 201833,7039
December 7, 201813,26411
December 7, 201839,2507
November 6, 20185,2451
November 2, 20182,2081
November 2, 20187,9089
November 2, 20183,11311
October 31, 20186113
October 31, 20183,6419

106www.hpannualmeeting.com


Table of Contents

Annex B Supplemental Information Regarding Participants

Name     Transaction Date     # of Shares     Transaction
Description
October 31, 20181,43311
August 30, 201843,38812
August 30, 2018138,0751
April 30, 20181,10213
March 12, 201861,61412
March 12, 201861,6141

Transaction Description

1.Open market sale
2.Grant of stock options
3.Grant of fully vested shares as part of non-employee Director annual equity retainer
4.Grant of stock options as part of non-employee Director annual equity retainer
5.Shares issued upon settlement of restricted stock units previously granted as part of non-employee Director annual equity retainer
6.Grant of fully vested shares as part of annual equity retainer, receipt of which the Director has elected to defer until a later date
7.Grant of time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”)
8.Grant of performance-adjusted restricted stock units (“PARSUs”)
9.Shares issued upon settlement of RSUs
10.Shares issued upon settlement of PARSUs
11.Shares withheld for taxes upon settlement of RSUs and/or PARSUs and/or exercise of options
12.Exercise of stock option
13.Purchase pursuant to ESPP

Miscellaneous Information Regarding Participants

Except as described in this Annex B or otherwise disclosed13 director nominees named in the proxy statement Nominees: Company Proposals The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of the nominees listed in Proposal 1 below: 1k. Judith Miscik 1l. Kim K.W. Rucker 1m. Subra Suresh 1b. Shumeet Banerji 1a. Aida M. Alvarez 1e. Bruce Broussard 1f. Stacy Brown-Philpot 1c. Robert R. Bennett 1d. Charles V. Bergh 1i. Richard Clemmer 1g. Stephanie A. Burns 1h. Mary Anne Citrino 1j. Enrique Lores For Against Abstain For Against Abstain For Against Abstain Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. HP INC. 1501 PAGE MILL ROAD PALO ALTO, CA 94304 ! !!! ! !! VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com/HP or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HPQ2023 You may attend the Meeting via the Internet and vote during the Meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTEw


D97022-P85623 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The 2023 Notice and Proxy Statement and 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com/HP HP INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders April 24, 2023 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Enrique Lores, Julie Jacobs and Rick Hansen, and each of them, as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to act and to vote all shares of common stock of HP Inc. held of record or in an applicable plan by the undersigned at the close of business on February 23, 2023, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on Monday, April 24, 2023, or any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed and returned, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If this proxy is properly executed and returned but no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR all of the nominees for director in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2 and 3, 1 YEAR for Proposal 4, and AGAINST Proposal 5. Whether or not direction is made, this proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the discretion of the proxy holders upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof (including, if applicable, on any matter which the Board of Directors did not know would be presented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders by a reasonable time before the proxy solicitation was made and for the election of a person to the Company’s knowledge:

No Participant owns any securities of the Company of record that such Participant does not own beneficially.

No Participant is, or was within the past year, a party to any contract, arrangements or understandings with any person with respect to any securities of the Company, including, but not limited to joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, puts or calls, guarantees against loss or guarantees of profit, division of losses or profits, or the giving or withholding of proxies.

No associate of any Participant owns beneficially, directly or indirectly, any securities of the Company. No Participant owns beneficially, directly or indirectly, any securities of any subsidiary of the Company.

No Participant nor any associate of a Participant is a party to any transaction, since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year, or any currently proposed transaction, in which (i) the Company was or is to be a participant, (ii) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (iii) any Participant or any related person thereof had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

No Participant, nor any associate of a Participant, has any arrangement or understanding with any person (i) with respect to any future employment by the Company or its affiliates or (ii) with respect to any future transactions to which the Company or any of its affiliates will or may be a party.

No Participant has any substantial interest, direct or indirect, by security holdings or otherwise, in any matter to be acted upon at the annual meeting.


Proxy Statement107


Table of Contents

PRELIMINARY PROXY MATERIALS DATED [●], 2020 — SUBJECT TO COMPLETION




PLEASE VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET TODAY!
SEE REVERSE SIDE
FOR SIMPLE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS.



▼  TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE AND SIGN, DATE AND MAIL AS DESCRIBED ON REVERSE SIDE  ▼

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - [date], 2020, [time]
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF
THE HP INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS

W
H
I
T
E
P
R
O
X
Y

The undersigned hereby appoints Enrique Lores, Steven J. Fieler and Kim M. Rivera, and each of them, as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to act and to vote all shares of common stock of HP Inc. held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on [record date], at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at [location], on [date], at [time], or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

This proxy, when properly executed and returned, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If this proxy is properly executed and returned but no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR all of the nominees for director in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4, and AGAINST Proposals 5 and 6. Whether or not direction is made, this proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the discretion of the proxy holders upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof (including, if applicable, on any matter which the Board of Directors did not know would be presented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders by a reasonable time before the proxy solicitation was made and for the election of a person to the Board of Directors if any nominee named in Proposal 1 becomes unable to serve or for good cause will not serve). The undersigned hereby revokes all proxies previously given by the undersigned to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Continued on the reverse side



Table of Contents

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

TO FACILITATE TIMELY RECEIPT OF YOUR PROXY DESPITE ANY POTENTIAL SYSTEMS DISRUPTION
DUE TO COVID-19, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TOVOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET TODAY

1.Vote by Telephone —Call toll-free from the U.S. or Canada at1 (866) 860-0384, on a touch-tone telephone. If outside the U.S.or Canada, call+1 (646) 880-9093. Please follow the simple instructions provided. You will be required to provide the unique Control Number printed below.
OR
2.Vote by Internet—Please accesshttps://www.proxyvotenow.com/hpq,and follow the simple instructions provided. Please note you must type an “s” after http. You will be required to provide the unique Control Number printed below.
CONTROL NUMBER:

You may vote by telephone or Internet 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you had marked, signed and returned a proxy card.

Alternatively, you may sign, date and return the proxy card to: HP Inc. c/o Innisfree M&A Incorporated, FDR Station, P.O. Box 5156, New York, NY 10150-5156. However, we strongly encourage you to use this option only if you do not have access to a touch-tone telephone or to the Internet.
▼  TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE AND SIGN, DATE AND RETURN BY MAIL AS DESCRIBED ABOVE  ▼
Please mark your
vote as indicated in
this example

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR ALL nominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4.

1. Election of Directors if any nominee named in Proposal 1 becomes unable to serve or for one-year term.Nominees:01-Aida M. Alvarez; 02-Shumeet Banerji; 03-Robert R. Bennett; 04-Charles “Chip” V. Bergh; 05-Stacy Brown-Philpot; 06-Stephanie A. Burns; 07-Mary Anne Citrino; 08-Richard L. Clemmer; 09-Yoky Matsuoka; 10-Stacey Mobley; 11-Subra Suresh; 12-Enrique Lores

FOR ALLWITHHOLD
ALL
FOR ALL
EXCEPT

To withhold authoritygood cause will not serve). If the undersigned has a beneficial interest in shares held in a 401(k) plan sponsored by HP Inc., voting instructions with respect to such plan shares must be provided by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 19, 2023, in the manner described in the proxy statement. If voting instructions are not received by that time, the trustee shall vote shares of securities credited to a participants' account for which it has not received instructions in the same proportion on each issue as it votes those shares credited to participants accounts for which it has received voting directions, unless contrary to ERISA/applicable law. The undersigned hereby revokes all proxies previously given by the undersigned to vote forat the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except”adjournment or postponement thereof. Continued and write the number(s) of the nominee(s)to be signed on the line below:reverse side


2. Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as HP Inc.’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending October 31, 2020

FOR
AGAINST
ABSTAIN
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

3. Advisory Vote to Approve HP Inc.’s Executive Compensation (“Say on Pay”)

4. Vote to Approve HP Inc.’s 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST Proposals 5 and 6.

FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

5. Stockholder Proposal No. 1: Right to Act by Written Consent if Properly Presented at the Annual Meeting

6. Stockholder Proposal No. 2: To Repeal Certain Bylaw Provisions or Amendments if Properly Presented at the Annual Meeting


Date: _________________________, 2020
Signature
Signature (if jointly held)
Title(s)
NOTE:Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.