Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

North South was incorporated on November 9, 2012 in the state of Delaware. North South was formed to seek business opportunities in which to acquire patents from various entities and monetize the disposal of them through sales, litigation or licensing. As North South was formed in November 2012, there are no comparative periods for the prior year.

On April 2, 2013, North South entered into the Merger Agreement with Spherix, Nuta Virginia, and North South’s shareholders Upon closing of the Merger, North South will merge with and into Nuta Virginia with Nuta Virginia as the surviving corporation and the record owner of the North South Intellectual Property. The closing of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of a fairness opinion that the Merger Consideration (as defined below) is fair to stockholders and Spherix from a financial point of view, based on, among other things, the North South Intellectual Property assets, and the approval of Spherix’s shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding voting capital of Spherix to issue the Merger Consideration pursuant to NASDAQ listing standards.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger, at the closing of the Merger, an aggregate of 500 issued and outstanding shares of North South’s common stock will be converted into the right to receive an aggregate of 118,483 shares of Spherix’s Common Stock and 500 shares of North South’s Series A Preferred Stock and 128 shares of North South’s Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding will be converted into the right to receive an aggregate of 1,488,152 shares of Spherix’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, which is convertible into shares of Spherix’s Common Stock on a one-for-ten basis (collectively with the 118,483 shares of Common Stock, the “Merger Consideration”).

At the effective time of the Merger, from the Merger Consideration, 150,000 shares of the Series D Preferred Stock (the “Escrow Shares”) shall be delivered to an escrow agent and shall be held pursuant to an escrow agreement to secure Spherix from certain claims that may arise with respect to the representations, warranties, covenants or indemnification obligations of North South’s shareholders for a period of twelve (12) months following the closing of the Merger. The Escrow Shares are the sole remedy for indemnifiable losses payable under the Merger Agreement.

Results of Operations

Three months ended March 31, 2013

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, North South generated no revenues and incurred a net loss of $22,169.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, North South incurred total operating expenses of $22,169, consisting of amortization expense, legal fees and fees paid to members of its board of directors.

Period from November 9, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012

During the period from November 9, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012, North South generated no revenues and incurred a net loss of $35,953.

During the period from November 9, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012, North South incurred total operating expenses of $35,953, consisting of legal fees and fees paid to members of its board of directors.

-32-

Liquidity and Capital Resources

North South has incurred $58,122 in operating losses for the period from November 9, 2012 (inception) to March 31, 2013. As of March 31, 2013, North South had $508,787 in cash. As of March 31, 2013, North South had working capital of $505,787 to fund operations. Subsequent to March 31, 2013, North South raised an additional $2,234,880 through the issuance and sale of its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.

Since inception, North South has sold 500 shares of common stock and 1,000 shares of preferred stock to its founders for gross aggregate proceeds of approximately $3.2 million.

North South must raise additional funds or increase revenues in order to fund its continuing operations. Additionally, as a condition to the closing of the Merger, unless waived by Spherix, North South is required to have a minimum of $2 million in cash at closing. North South may not be successful in its efforts to raise additional funds or achieve profitable operations. Even if North South is able to raise additional funds through the sale of its securities or through the issuance of debt securities, or through loans from related parties, its directors or financial institutions, its cash needs could be greater than anticipated in which case North South could be forced to raise additional capital.

At the present time, North South has no commitments for any additional financing, and there can be no assurance that, if needed, additional capital will be available to North South on commercially acceptable terms or at all.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There are no recently issued accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of the date of this Report, North South did not have any significant off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not Applicable.

Risks Associated with the Merger

~~Upon~~On or prior to the closing of the Merger of Nuta Virginia with North South, we intend to engage in a new additional line of business. We intend ~~through Nuta Virginia,~~ to become engaged in the commercialization and development of intellectual property assets. Our activities will generally include the acquisition and development of patents through internal or external research and development. In addition, we will seek to acquire existing rights to intellectual property through acquisitions of already issued patents and pending patent applications, both in the United States and abroad. We may alone or in conjunction with others develop products and processes associated with our intellectual property and license our intellectual property to others seeking to develop products or processes or whose products or processes infringe our intellectual property rights through legal processes.

A description of certain risks associated with the Merger and the new additional business we intend to pursue is included in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2013. Below are certain risk factors contained therein:

-33-

The Company intends to expand the focus of its business to commercializing, developing and monetizing intellectual property, including through licensing and enforcement. The Company may not be able to successfully monetize the patents which it acquires and thus it may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of such acquisition.

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully commercialize, acquire, develop or monetize the patent portfolio that it acquires from North South. The acquisition of the patents could fail to produce anticipated benefits, or could have other adverse effects that the Company does not currently foresee. Failure to successfully monetize these patent assets may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the acquisition of the patent portfolio is subject to a number of risks, including, but not limited to the following:

● There is a significant time lag between acquiring a patent portfolio and recognizing revenue from those patent assets. During that time lag, material costs are likely to be incurred that would have a negative effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial position; and

● The integration of a patent portfolio will be a time consuming and expensive process that may disrupt the Company’s operations. If its integration efforts are not successful, the Company’s results of operations could be harmed. In addition, the Company may not achieve anticipated synergies or other benefits from such acquisition.

Therefore, there is no assurance that the monetization of the patent portfolios to be acquired will generate enough revenue to recoup the Company’s investment.

The Company’s operating history makes it difficult to evaluate its current business and future prospects.

The Company has, prior to the acquisition of North South, been involved in businesses primarily involving research and development in furtherance of drug and pharmaceutical products and processes, including nutritional supplements and related services. Prior to the consummation of the Merger, the Company’s business has consisted entirely of its biotechnology research and development unit. The Company not only has no operating history in executing its additional new business which includes, among other things, creating, commercializing, prosecuting, licensing, litigating or otherwise monetizing patent assets. The Company’s lack of operating history in this sector makes it difficult to evaluate its additional new business model and future prospects.

The Company will be initially reliant exclusively on the patent assets it acquired from North South. If the Company is unable to commercialize, license or otherwise monetize such assets and generate revenue and profit through those assets or by other means, there is a significant risk that the Company’s business will fail.

Upon closing of the Merger, the Company will acquire a portfolio of patent assets from North South that it plans to commercialize, license or otherwise monetize. If the Company’s efforts to generate revenue from such assets fail, the Company will have incurred significant losses and may be unable to acquire additional assets. If this occurs, the Company’s business will likely fail.

Upon closing of the Merger and commencement of its additional new line of business, the Company may commence legal proceedings against certain companies, and the Company expects such litigation to be time-consuming and costly, which may adversely affect its financial condition and its ability to operate its business.

To license or otherwise monetize its patent assets, which may constitute a significant focus of the Company’s future activities, the Company may be required to commence legal proceedings against certain companies, pursuant to which the Company may allege that such companies infringe on one or more of the Company’s patents. The Company’s viability could be highly dependent on the outcome of this litigation, and there is a risk that the Company may be unable to achieve the results it desires from such litigation, which failure would harm the Company’s business to a great degree. In addition, the defendants in this litigation are likely to be much larger than the Company and have substantially more resources than the Company does, which could make the Company’s litigation efforts more difficult.

-34-

The Company anticipates that these legal proceedings may continue for several years and may require significant expenditures for legal fees and other expenses. Disputes regarding the assertion of patents and other intellectual property rights are highly complex and technical. Once initiated, the Company may be forced to litigate against others to enforce or defend its intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of other parties’ proprietary rights. The defendants or other third parties involved in the lawsuits in which the Company is involved may allege defenses and/or file counterclaims in an effort to avoid or limit liability and damages for patent infringement. If such defenses or counterclaims are successful, they may preclude the Company’s ability to derive licensing revenue from the patents. A negative outcome of any such litigation, or one or more claims contained within any such litigation, could materially and adversely impact the Company’s business. Additionally, the Company anticipates that its legal fees and other expenses will be material and will negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and may result in its inability to continue its business.

The Company may seek to internally develop additional new inventions and intellectual property, which would take time and be costly. Moreover, the failure to obtain or maintain intellectual property rights for such inventions would lead to the loss of the Company’s investments in such activities.

Part of the Company’s additional new business may include the internal development of new inventions or intellectual property that the Company will seek to monetize. However, this aspect of the Company’s business would likely require significant capital and would take time to achieve. Such activities could also distract our management team from its present business initiatives, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s business. There is also the risk that the Company’s initiatives in this regard would not yield any viable new inventions or technology, which would lead to a loss of the Company’s investments in time and resources in such activities.

In addition, even if the Company is able to internally develop new inventions, in order for those inventions to be viable and to compete effectively, the Company would need to develop and maintain, and it would heavily rely upon, a proprietary position with respect to such inventions and intellectual property. However, there are significant risks associated with any such intellectual property the Company may develop principally including the following:

patent applications the Company may file may not result in issued patents or may take longer than the Company expects to result in issued patents;

● the Company may be subject to interference proceedings;

● the Company may be subject to opposition proceedings in the U.S. or foreign countries;

● any patents that are issued to the Company may not provide meaningful protection;

● the Company may not be able to develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;

● other companies may challenge patents issued to the Company;

● other companies may have independently developed and/or patented (or may in the future independently develop and patent) similar or alternative technologies, or duplicate the Company’s technologies;

● other companies may design around technologies the Company has developed; and

● enforcement of the Company’s patents would be complex, uncertain and very expensive.

-35-

The Company cannot be certain that patents will be issued as a result of any future applications, or that any of the Company’s patents, once issued, will provide the Company with adequate protection from competing products. For example, issued patents may be circumvented or challenged, declared invalid or unenforceable, or narrowed in scope. In addition, since publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries, the Company cannot be certain that it will be the first to make its additional new inventions or to file patent applications covering those inventions. It is also possible that others may have or may obtain issued patents that could prevent the Company from commercializing the Company’s products or require the Company to obtain licenses requiring the payment of significant fees or royalties in order to enable the Company to conduct its business. As to those patents that the Company may license or otherwise monetize, the Company’s rights will depend on maintaining its obligations to the licensor under the applicable license agreement, and the Company may be unable to do so. The Company’s failure to obtain or maintain intellectual property rights for the Company’s inventions would lead to the loss the Company’s ~~business .~~business.

Moreover, patent application delays could cause delays in recognizing revenue from the Company’s internally generated patents and could cause the Company to miss opportunities to license patents before other competing technologies are developed or introduced into the market.

New legislation, regulations or court rulings related to enforcing patents could harm the Company’s new line of business and operating results.

If Congress, the United States Patent and Trademark Office or courts implement new legislation, regulations or rulings that impact the patent enforcement process or the rights of patent holders, these changes could negatively affect the Company’s new business model. For example, limitations on the ability to bring patent enforcement claims, limitations on potential liability for patent infringement, lower evidentiary standards for invalidating patents, increases in the cost to resolve patent disputes and other similar developments could negatively affect the Company’s ability to assert its patent or other intellectual property rights.

In addition, on September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the “Leahy-Smith Act”), was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to United States patent law. These changes include provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. The U.S. Patent Office is currently developing regulations and procedures to govern administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act recently became effective. Accordingly, it is too early to tell what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of the Company’s business. However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of the Company’s issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition.

On February 27, 2013, US Representatives DeFazio and Chaffetz introduced HR845. In general, the bill known as the SHIELD Act (“Saving High-tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes”), seeks to assess legal fee liability to plaintiffs in patent infringement actions for defendants costs. In the event that the bill becomes law, the potential obligation to pay the legal fees of defendants in patent disputes could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial condition.

On June 4, 2013, the Obama Administration issued executive actions and legislative recommendations. The legislative measures recommended by the Obama Administration include requiring patentees and patent applicants to disclose the “Real Party-in-Interest”, giving district courts more discretion to award attorney’s fees to the prevailing party, requiring public filing of demand letters such that they are accessible to the public, and protecting consumers against liability for a product being used off-the shelf and solely for its intended use.

The executive actions includes ordering the USPTO to make rules to require the disclosure of the Real Party-in-Interest by requiring patent applicants and owners to regularly update ownership information when they are involved in proceedings before the USPTO (e.g. specifying the “ultimate parent entity”) and requiring the USPTO to train its examiners to better scrutinize functional claims to prevent allowing overly broad claims.

-36-

It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed, or whether any of the proposals will become enacted as laws. Compliance with any new or existing laws or regulations could be difficult and expensive, affect the manner in which the Company conducts its business and negatively impact the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s acquisitions of patent assets may be time consuming, complex and costly, which could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

Acquisitions of patent or other intellectual property assets, which are and will be critical to the Company’s business plan, are often time consuming, complex and costly to consummate. The Company may utilize many different transaction structures in its acquisitions and the terms of such acquisition agreements tend to be heavily negotiated. As a result, the Company expects to incur significant operating expenses and will likely be required to raise capital during the negotiations even if the acquisition is ultimately not consummated. Even if the Company is able to acquire particular patent assets, there is no guarantee that the Company will generate sufficient revenue related to those patent assets to offset the acquisition costs. While the Company will seek to conduct confirmatory due diligence on the patent assets the Company is considering for acquisition, the Company may acquire patent assets from a seller who does not have proper title to those assets. In those cases, the Company may be required to spend significant resources to defend the Company’s interest in the patent assets and, if the Company is not successful, its acquisition may be invalid, in which case the Company could lose part or all of its investment in the assets.

The Company may also identify patent or other intellectual property assets that cost more than the Company is prepared to spend with its own capital resources. The Company may incur significant costs to organize and negotiate a structured acquisition that does not ultimately result in an acquisition of any patent assets or, if consummated, proves to be unprofitable for the Company. These higher costs could adversely affect the Company’s operating results, and if the Company incurs losses, the value of its securities will decline.

In addition, the Company may acquire patents and technologies that are in the early stages of adoption in the commercial, industrial and consumer markets. Demand for some of these technologies will likely be untested and may be subject to fluctuation based upon the rate at which the Company’s licensees will adopt its patents and technologies in their products and services. As a result, there can be no assurance as to whether technologies the Company acquires or develops will have value that it can monetize.

In certain acquisitions of patent assets, the Company may seek to defer payment or finance a portion of the acquisition price. This approach may put the Company at a competitive disadvantage and could result in harm to the Company’s business.

The Company has limited capital and may seek to negotiate acquisitions of patent or other intellectual property assets where the Company can defer payments or finance a portion of the acquisition price. These types of debt financing or deferred payment arrangements may not be as attractive to sellers of patent assets as receiving the full purchase price for those assets in cash at the closing of the acquisition. As a result, the Company might not compete effectively against other companies in the market for acquiring patent assets, many of whom have greater cash resources than the Company has. In addition, any failure to satisfy the Company’s debt repayment obligations may result in adverse consequences to its operating results.

Any failure to maintain or protect the Company’s patent assets or other intellectual property rights could significantly impair its return on investment from such assets and harm the Company’s brand, its business and its operating results.

The Company’s ability to operate its new additional line of business and compete in the intellectual property market largely depends on the superiority, uniqueness and value of the Company’s acquired patent assets and other intellectual property. To protect its proprietary rights, the Company will rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, confidentiality agreements with its employees and third parties, and protective contractual provisions. No assurances can be given that any of the measures the Company undertakes to protect and maintain its assets will have any measure of success.

-37-

Following the acquisition of patent assets, the Company will likely be required to spend significant time and resources to maintain the effectiveness of those assets by paying maintenance fees and making filings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Company may acquire patent assets, including patent applications, which require the Company to spend resources to prosecute the applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Further, there is a material risk that patent related claims (such as, for example, infringement claims (and/or claims for indemnification resulting therefrom), unenforceability claims, or invalidity claims) will be asserted or prosecuted against the Company, and such assertions or prosecutions could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business. Regardless of whether any such claims are valid or can be successfully asserted, defending such claims could cause the Company to incur significant costs and could divert resources away from the Company’s other activities.

Despite the Company’s efforts to protect its intellectual property rights, any of the following or similar occurrences may reduce the value of the Company’s intellectual property:

● the Company’s applications for patents, trademarks and copyrights may not be granted and, if granted, may be challenged or invalidated;

● issued trademarks, copyrights, or patents may not provide the Company with any competitive advantages when compared to potentially infringing other properties;

● the Company’s efforts to protect its intellectual property rights may not be effective in preventing misappropriation of the Company’s technology; or

● the Company’s efforts may not prevent the development and design by others of products or technologies similar to or competitive with, or superior to those the Company acquires and/or prosecutes.

Moreover, the Company may not be able to effectively protect its intellectual property rights in certain foreign countries where the Company may do business in the future or from which competitors may operate. If the Company fails to maintain, defend or prosecute its patent assets properly, the value of those assets would be reduced or eliminated, and the Company’s business would be harmed.

Weak global economic conditions may cause infringing parties to delay entering into licensing agreements, which could prolong the Company’s litigation and adversely affect its financial condition and operating results.

The Company’s new business plan depends significantly on worldwide economic conditions, and the United States and world economies have recently experienced weak economic conditions. Uncertainty about global economic conditions poses a risk as businesses may postpone spending in response to tighter credit, negative financial news and declines in income or asset values. This response could have a material negative effect on the willingness of parties infringing on the Company’s assets to enter into licensing or other revenue generating agreements voluntarily. Entering into such agreements is critical to the Company’s business plan, and the Company’s failure to do so could cause material harm to its business.

If the Company is unable to adequately protect its intellectual property, the Company may not be able to compete effectively.

The Company’s ability to compete depends in part upon the strength of the Company’s proprietary rights that it will own as a result of the Merger or may hereafter acquire in its technologies, brands and content. The Company intends to rely on a combination of U.S. and foreign patents, copyrights, trademark, trade secret laws and license agreements to establish and protect its intellectual property and proprietary rights. The efforts the Company takes to protect its intellectual property and proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective at stopping unauthorized use of its intellectual property and proprietary rights. In addition, effective trademark, patent, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available or cost-effective in every country in which the Company’s services are made available. There may be instances where the Company is not able to fully protect or utilize its intellectual property in a manner that maximizes competitive advantage. If the Company is unable to protect its intellectual property and proprietary rights from unauthorized use, the value of the Company’s products may be reduced, which could negatively impact the Company’s new business. The Company’s inability to obtain appropriate protections for its intellectual property may also allow competitors to enter the Company’s markets and produce or sell the same or similar products. In addition, protecting the Company’s intellectual property and other proprietary rights is expensive and diverts critical managerial resources. If any of the foregoing were to occur, or if the Company is otherwise unable to protect its intellectual property and proprietary rights, the Company’s business and financial results could be adversely affected.

-38-

If the Company is forced to resort to legal proceedings to enforce its intellectual property rights, the proceedings could be burdensome and expensive. In addition, the Company’s proprietary rights could be at risk if the Company is unsuccessful in, or cannot afford to pursue, those proceedings. The Company will also rely on trade secrets and contract law to protect some of its proprietary technology. The Company will enter into confidentiality and invention agreements with its employees and consultants. Nevertheless, these agreements may not be honored and they may not effectively protect the Company’s right to its un-patented trade secrets and know-how. Moreover, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to the Company’s trade secrets and know-how.

If the NASDAQ Stock Market determines that the Merger with North South and the issuance of the Merger Consideration results in a change of control of the Company, the Company may be required to submit a new application under NASDAQ’s original listing standards and if such application is not approved, the Company’s Common Stock may be delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market.

In connection with the Merger, the Company will issue 118,483 shares of Common Stock and 1,488,152 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, which are convertible into shares of Common Stock on a one-for-ten basis. The Company does not believe the issuance of the Merger Consideration will result in a change of control of the Company because of, among other things, the significant overlap in ownership between the Company and North South. NASDAQ Rule 5110(a) provides that a Company must apply for initial listing in connection with a transaction whereby a company combines with a non-NASDAQ entity, resulting in a change of control of such company and potentially allowing the non-NASDAQ entity to effectively obtain NASDAQ listing. In determining whether a change of control has occurred, NASDAQ considers all relevant factors including, changes in management, board of directors, voting power, ownership and financial structure of the Company. If The NASDAQ Stock Market determines that a change of control does in fact result from the consummation of the Merger and the issuance of the Merger Consideration and an original listing application has not been approved prior to the consummation of Merger, the Company will be in violation of NASDAQ Rule 5110(a) and the Company’s Common Stock could be delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market.

PROPOSAL TO APPROVE SPHERIX INCORPORATED 2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

Description of Our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan

On April 1, 2013, the Company’s board of directors adopted the Spherix Incorporated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”), an omnibus equity incentive plan pursuant to which the Company may grant equity and cash and equity-linked awards to certain management, directors, consultants and others. The Company’s board of directors recommends adoption of the 2013 Plan in order to promote the success of the Company by providing a means to offer incentives and to attract, motivate, retain and reward persons eligible to participate in the 2013 Plan. Accordingly, the Company’s board of directors voted unanimously to adopt the 2013 Plan.

Set forth below is a summary of the 2013 Plan, but this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2013 Plan, a copy of which is included as Appendix A to this Consent Solicitation Statement.

Shares Available

The 2013 Plan authorizes approximately ~~15 %~~15% or our fully-diluted Common Stock (2,800,000 shares) be reserved for issuance under the Plan, after giving effect to the shares of our capital stock issuable under the Merger. As of July 1031, 2013 , ~~2013,~~ 2,010,500 option shares were issued under our 2013 Plan, subject to shareholder approval of the 2013 Plan, and 122,250 shares of Common Stock were issued under our previously adopted 2012 Plan.

Index to Financial Statements

	Page


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7


Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	F-31

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	F-32

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	F-33

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	F-34

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Spherix Incorporated

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Spherix Incorporated (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Spherix Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2, the 2011 consolidated financial statements have been restated to correct a misstatement related to the accounting for warrants.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

McLean, VA

March 20, 2013

F-2

Spherix Incorporated

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

	2012			2011
				Restated
Revenue	$	19,922		$	-

Operating expense
Research and development expense		(727,091	)		(1,645,939	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		(2,764,836	)		(2,548,007	)
Total operating expense		(3,491,927	)		(4,193,946	)
Loss from operations		(3,472,005	)		(4,193,946	)

Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants		1,202,489			3,716,812
Loss on issuance of warrants		(621,983	)		(4,983	)
Interest income		3,466			3,455
Other income		-			51,261
Gain on settlement of obligations		-			845,000
(Loss) income from continuing operations before taxes		(2,888,033	)		417,599
Income tax expense		-			(14,485	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations		(2,888,033	)		403,114

Discontinued operations
Loss from discontinued operations		(968,991	)		(383,529	)
Income tax expense		-			-
Loss from discontinued operations		(968,991	)		(383,529	)

Net (loss) income	$	(3,857,024	)	$	19,585

Net (loss) income per share, basic
Continuing operations	$	(10.56	)	$	3.07
Discontinued operations	$	(3.54	)	$	(2.92	)
Net (loss) income per share	$	(14.10	)	$	0.15
Net loss per share, diluted
Continuing operations	$	(10.56	)	$	(2.37	)
Discontinued operations	$	(3.54	)	$	(2.77	)
Net loss per share	$	(14.10	)	$	(5.14	)

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic		273,567			131,285
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted		273,567			138,346

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

Spherix Incorporated

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011

ASSETS	2012			2011
Current assets				Restated
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,498,237		$	4,911,350
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $0 and $8,174		-			-
Other receivables		3,425			293
Prepaid research expenses		-			209,780
Prepaid expenses and other assets		100,474			116,565
Assets of segment held for sale		104,265			289,927
Total current assets		4,706,401			5,527,915

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		24,009			85,374
of $308,386 and $244,711
Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $0 and $2,146		-			-
Deposit		25,625			35,625
Assets of segment held for sale, non-current		-			6,108
Total assets	$	4,756,035		$	5,655,022

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	425,774		$	269,996
Accrued salaries and benefits		280,263			242,550
Liabilities of segment held for sale		25,040			380,136
Total current liabilities		731,077			892,682

Deferred rent		45,081			47,675
Warrant liability		3,125,393			916,621
Total liabilities		3,901,551			1,856,978

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 5,250 series B issued and 1 outstanding at December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011		-			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 814,114 and 155,150 issued, 813,713 and 154,749 outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively		82			16
Paid-in capital in excess of par value		36,630,406			35,717,008
Treasury stock, 401 shares		(464,786	)		(464,786	)
Accumulated deficit		(35,311,218	)		(31,454,194	)
Total stockholders' equity		854,484			3,798,044
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	4,756,035		$	5,655,022

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

Spherix Incorporated

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended December 2012 and 2011

	Preferred Stock				Common Stock					Paid-in Capital in Excess of			Treasury Stock					Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount		Par			Shares		Amount			Deficit			Equity


Balance, January 1, 2011 (Restated)		1	$	-		107,181		$	11		34,536,947			401		(464,786	)		31,473,779		$	2,598,393

Sale of common stock, net of
offering costs of $103,196 (Restated)		-		-		47,969			5		1,144,527			-		-			-			1,144,532
Stock-based compensation (Restated)		-		-		-			-		35,534			-		-			-			35,534
Net income (Restated)		-		-		-			-		-			-		-			19,585			19,585

Balance, December 31, 2011 (Restated)		1		-		155,150			16		35,717,008			401		(464,786	)		(31,454,194	)		3,798,044

Sale of common stock, net of
offering costs of $77,012		-		-		536,898			54		858,647			-		-			-			858,701
Stock-based compensation		-		-		122,250			12		56,436			-		-			-			56,448
Fractional shares payment		-		-		(184	)		-		(1,685	)		-		-			-			(1,685	)
Net loss		-		-		-			-		-			-		-			(3,857,024	)		(3,857,024	)

Balance, December 31, 2012		1	$	-		814,114		$	82		36,630,406			401		(464,786	)		(35,311,218	)	$	854,484

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

Spherix Incorporated

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities				Restated
Net (loss) income		(3,857,024	)	$	19,585
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
used in operating activities:
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants		(1,202,489	)		(3,716,812	)
Issuance costs of warrants accounted for at fair value		245,513			230,604
Loss on issuance of warrants		621,983			4,983
Gain on settlement of obligation		-			(845,000	)
Depreciation and amortization		63,675			66,308
Stock-based compensation		56,448			35,534
Provision for doubtful accounts		(8,174	)		8,174
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables		5,042			262,333
Prepaid expenses and other assets		235,871			289,830
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		193,491			(366,885	)
Deferred rent		(2,594	)		(33,270	)
Deferred compensation		-			(305,000	)
Net cash used in activities of continuing operations		(3,648,258	)		(4,349,616	)
Net cash used in activities of discontinued operations		(167,429	)		(10,044	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(3,815,687	)		(4,359,660	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of fixed assets		(2,309	)		(2,374	)
Net cash used in activities of continuing operations		(2,309	)		(2,374	)
Net cash provided by (used in) activities of discontinued operations		4,102			(2,478	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		1,793			(4,852	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants		3,724,991			4,034,352
Issuance cost of common stock and warrants		(322,525	)		(333,800	)
Reverse stock split fractional share payment		(1,685	)		-
Net cash provided by activities of continuing operations		3,400,781			3,700,552
Net cash provided by financing activities		3,400,781			3,700,552

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(413,113	)		(663,960	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		4,911,350			5,575,310

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	4,498,237		$	4,911,350

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for taxes	$	-		$	160,829

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

Spherix Incorporated

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

The Company previously operated via two principal segments, Biospherics, our biotechnology research and development business, and Health Sciences, a technical and regulatory consulting business. The Health Sciences business provided technical and regulatory consulting services to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, as well as providing technical support for the Company’s own R&D activities. The Company generally provided its consulting services on either a fixed price basis or on a “time and expenses” basis, charging hourly rates for each staff member involved in a project, based on his or her skills and experience.

During the years covered by this report, the Company had two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Biospherics Incorporated and Spherix Consulting, Inc., for its two operating segments. The Company’s Health Sciences contracts are in the name of Spherix Consulting, Inc. and the Company’s patents are in the name of Biospherics Incorporated. Spherix Incorporated provides management, strategic guidance, business development, marketing and other services to its subsidiaries. The operations of Spherix Consulting, Inc. have been retroactively adjusted as discontinued operations as a result of the December 3, 2012 sale of the subsidiary. Certain assets of Spherix Consulting, Inc. were retained by the Company but are presented as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 as they relate to the discounted operations.

On May 6, 2011, the Company effected a one-for-ten reverse split of its common stock. The Company implemented the reverse stock split under the authority granted to the Board of Directors by the Company's stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders held on November 17, 2009. The reverse stock split reduced the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock from 25,624,872 shares to 2,562,488 shares at that time.

On September 21, 2012, the Company effected a one-for-twenty reverse split of its common stock. The Company implemented the reverse stock split under the authority granted to the Board of Directors by the Company's stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders held on August 14, 2012. The reverse stock split reduced the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock from 4,159,777 shares to 207,806 shares. All per share amounts and outstanding shares, including all Common Stock equivalents, stock options, equity compensation plans, and warrants, have been retroactively adjusted in the Financial Statements and in the Notes to the Financial Statements for all periods presented to reflect the reverse stock split.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Spherix Incorporated and Biospherics Incorporated. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). This requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Significant estimates include the fair value of warrants, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, stock compensation expense, amortization and depreciation. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash and cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash balances at several banks. Interest bearing accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. At December 31, 2012, the Company’s interest bearing deposits in excess of the FDIC limits was $4.5 million. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

F-7

Property and Equipment and Depreciation

Property and equipment are stated at cost and consist of office furniture and equipment, computer hardware and software, and leasehold improvements. The Company computes depreciation and amortization under the straight-line method and typically over the following estimated useful lives of the related assets:

Office furniture and equipment 3 to 10 years

Computer hardware and software 3 to 5 years

Leasehold improvements are depreciated or amortized over the shorter of the term of the related lease or the estimated useful lives of the assets (generally 5 to 10 years). Major additions, improvements and renewals are capitalized at cost and ordinary repairs, maintenance, and renewals are expensed in the year incurred. Gains or losses from the sale or retirement of property and equipment result from the difference between sales proceeds (if any) and the assets’ net book value, and are recorded in the consolidated Statements of Operations.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of long-lived assets, including patents and property and equipment, may not be fully recoverable, the Company evaluates the probability that the future undiscounted net cash flows, without interest charges, will be less than the carrying amount of the assets. If any impairment is indicated as a result of this review, the Company would recognize a loss based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, determined based on the discounted future cash flows. In 2012 and 2011, no such impairment was noted.

Treasury Stock

The Company accounts for the treasury stock using the cost method, which treats it as a reduction in stockholders’ equity.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

The Company accounts for the issuance of Common Stock purchase warrants issued in connection with the equity offerings in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

See Note 2 related to the restatement for the accounting for stock purchase warrants.

Preferred Stock

Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. Accordingly the Company classifies conditionally redeemable preferred shares (if any), which includes preferred shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control, as temporary equity. At all other times, the Company classifies its preferred shares as a component of stockholders’ equity.

The Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock does not feature any redemption rights within the holders’ control or conditional redemption features not solely within the Company’s control as of December 31, 2012. Accordingly, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is presented as a component of stockholders’ equity.

F-8

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the contract price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. On time and expense contracts revenue is recognized at contractually agreed-upon rates based upon direct labor hours expended and other direct costs incurred. Revenue for fixed-price contracts is recognized under the proportional performance method based upon labor charged in relation to total expected labor charges. Losses, if any, on contracts are recorded during the period when first determined.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

The Company’s selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of executive management salaries and fringe benefits, sales and marketing costs, finance and accounting, human resources, as well as general corporate costs and costs related to being a public company.

Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants

The fair value of warrants is measured each quarter and the change in fair value between periods is recognized as other income or expense in the respective periods.

Loss on Issuance of Warrants

The loss on issuance of warrants reflects the difference in the fair market value of the warrants as determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation method and the proceeds received. The proceeds received from Warrants issued with other instruments (such as common stock or preferred stock) are determined based upon the fair value of liability classified warrants with the residual allocated to the other instruments.

Other Income

Other income consists of two grants from the U.S. Government awarded in October 2010 in support of the Company’s diabetes and triglyceride research. As a result, in 2011 the Company recognized $51,000 in other income and a related tax expense of $14,000. No grant awards were recognized in 2012.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year end, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established based upon periodic assessments made by management to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the current tax provision for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties on tax liabilities as interest expense. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had no unrecognized income tax benefits and recognized no interest or penalties on income tax liabilities.

Discontinued operations

The operations of Spherix Consulting, Inc. have been retroactively adjusted as discontinued operations as a result of the December 3, 2012 sale. The Spherix Consulting segment generated nearly all of the Company’s revenue and provided technical support for the Company’s Biospherics segment.

F-9

	2012			2011
Revenue	$	728,312		$	820,925

Direct cost and operating expense		(417,428	)		(388,065	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		(1,279,875	)		(816,389	)
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes	$	(968,991	)	$	(383,529	)

Fair Value Information

We group financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1

Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets. Valuations are obtained from available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities which use observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in active markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s warrants was determined by the use of unobservable Level 3 inputs. The warrants are measured at estimated fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is based, in part, upon inputs for which there is little or no observable market data, requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions. Inherent in this model are assumptions related to expected stock-price volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. We estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date of issuance, and at each subsequent reporting period, based on historical volatility that matches the expected remaining life of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve on the grant date for a maturity similar to the expected remaining life of the warrants. The expected life of the warrants is assumed to be equivalent to their remaining contractual term. The dividend rate is based on our historical rate. The assumptions used in calculating the estimated fair value of the warrants represent our best estimates. However these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and different assumptions are used, the warrant liability and the change in estimated fair value could be materially different.

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had approximately $3.1 million and $0.9 million of warrant liabilities, respectively (see note 9 – Warrant Liability). The Company’s other financial instruments, which consist only of cash and cash equivalents approximate their carrying value given their short maturities.

F-10

The following table summarizes the activity of Level 3 inputs measured on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2012:

	Fair Value Measurements of Warrants Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Balance at December 31, 2011 (Restated)	$	3,125,000

Change in fair value of Warrant Liability		(2,208,000	)

Balance at December 31, 2012	$	917,000

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Company applies the fair value method, which requires that the fair value measurement of all employee share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be expensed over their requisite service period based on their value at the grant date using their fair value, determined using a prescribed option-pricing model. The Company uses a Black-Scholes option valuation method to value stock options. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $56,000 and $36,000, respectively, in stock based compensation expense relating to the issuance of 2,250 stock options awarded in November 2011, the issuance of 1,333 stock options awarded in April 2010 and the issuance of 2,950 stock options awarded in February 2006 (see Note 10, “Stockholders’ Equity”).

Net (Loss) Income Per Share

Basic net (loss) income per common share has been computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net income per common share has been computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus an assumed increase in common shares outstanding for common stock equivalents. At December 31, 2012, the exercise price of 1,151 of the Company’s 7,163 outstanding options and 483,657 of the Company’s 550,664 warrants was below the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the period, however these were excluded from the dilutive calculation as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. At December 31, 2011, the exercise price of 293shares of the Company’s 2,425 outstanding options and 27,427 shares of the Company’s 55,391 warrants was below the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the period.

Diluted earnings per share Calculation	December 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
				(Restated)
Net (loss) income	$	(3,857,024	)	$	19,585
Less other income from change in fair value of warrants assumed exercised		--			(730,862	)
Adjusted net loss	$	(3,857,024	)	$	(711,277	)

Diluted shares outstanding
Weighted average shares outstanding,		273,567			131,285
Shares assumed exercised		--			7,061
Diluted shares outstanding		273,567			138,346

Net loss per share, diluted	$	(14.10	)	$	(5.14	)

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the presentation of comprehensive income. The new standard requires the presentation of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new standard was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with retrospective application. The adoption of the new standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements as the Company has no items which would be included in comprehensive income other than net income (loss). The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB deferred the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income, while still requiring entities to adopt the other requirements. We adopted the new standard on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this standard had no impact on our consolidated financial statements. In February of 2013, the FASB issued a new accounting standard to improve the transparency of reporting reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income by requiring entities to present in one place information about significant amounts reclassified and, in some cases, to provide cross-references to related footnotes. We are required to adopt this standard as of the beginning of 2013. We do not expect this adoption to have a material impact on our financial statements.

F-11

In May 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which was an amendment to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in GAAP and international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”). The amendments explain how to measure fair value and will improve the comparability of fair value measurement presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and IFRS. The standard requires new quantitative and qualitative disclosures about the sensitivity of recurring Level 3 measurement disclosures, as well as transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. This authoritative guidance is to be applied prospectively. The standard was effective and adopted by the Company during 2012.

2. Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements

Background

On February 27, 2013, Company management, in consultation with its Audit Committee, revised its prior position on accounting for warrants and concluded that its previously issued consolidated financial statements for all periods since mid-November 2009 (collectively, the “Affected Periods”) should not be relied on because of a misapplication in the guidance on accounting for Warrants (as defined below). The restated consolidated balance sheets only reflect previously reported and restated amounts for "Total Liabilities" as "Current Liabilities" were not impacted. However, the non-cash adjustments to the financial statements, in all of the Affected Periods, do not impact the amounts previously reported for the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, total assets, revenue, or net cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities.

The warrants at issue (collectively, the “Warrants”) include:

(i)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,522 and 414 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in November 2009 at an exercise price of $650.00 and $575.00 per share, respectively;

(ii)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,500 and 630 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in October 2010 at an exercise price of $300.00 and $312.50 per share, respectively;

(iii)

warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,673 and 640 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in January 2011 at an exercise price of $160.00 and $162.50 per share, respectively;

(iv)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 26,628 and 799 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in October 2011 at an exercise price of $44.80 and $59.13 per share, respectively;

(v)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,648 and 1,597 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in February 2012 at an exercise price of $28.00 and $27.00 per share, respectively; and

(vi)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 483,657 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in November 2012 at an exercise price of $6.53 per share;

The above warrant shares and exercise prices have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 2011 and 2012 reverse stock splits.

Historically, the Warrants were reflected as a component of equity as opposed to liabilities on the balance sheets and the statements of operations did not include the subsequent non-cash changes in estimated fair value of the Warrants in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The Warrant agreements contain a provision for net cash settlement at the option of the holder in the event that there is a fundamental transaction (as contractually defined in the Warrant agreements). The Company had previously conducted in-depth analysis in prior years of its other warrants and concluded that all fundamental transactions were within the control of the Company and thus equity treatment for the warrants was appropriate. However, new insight on derivatives, obtained by the Company during the process of analyzing the accounting guidance for the November 2012 warrants prompted the Company to re-assess its prior position.

Under the guidance of ASC 815, warrant instruments that could potentially require net cash settlement in the absence of express language precluding such settlement, should be initially classified as derivative liabilities as their estimated fair values, regardless of the likelihood that such instruments will ever be settled in cash. In periods subsequent to issuance, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative instruments should be reported in the statement of operations. The Audit Committee, together with management, determined that the consolidated financial statements in the Affected Periods should be restated to reflect the Warrants as liabilities, with subsequent changes in their estimated fair value recorded as non-cash income or expense in each Affected Period.

F-12

The Company has restated its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2011 and the related disclosures. The Company has not amended its previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 or its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2010 to correct these misstatements.

The impact of the restatement on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2012 and 2011are presented below, as wells as the impact on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, and the consolidated balance sheets then ended. The restatement had no impact on net cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as the adjustments resulting from the non-cash change in the fair value of the warrant liability for each period and the statements of operations only impacted net income (loss) from continuing operations. In addition to the restatement noted above, the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated balance sheets have also been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the Company’s September 2012 reverse stock splits, and for the discontinued operations as discussed in note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation.”

Impact of the Restatement

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data (Unaudited):	Reported*			Adjustment			Restated
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(674,856	)	$	(17,636	)	$	(692,492	)
Loss from operations	$	(1,046,259	)	$	(17,636	)	$	(1,063,895	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	339,308		$	339,308
Loss from continuing operations	$	(1,045,237	)	$	321,672		$	(723,565	)
Net loss	$	(1,155,955	)	$	321,672		$	(834,283	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(6.21	)	$	1.73		$	(4.48	)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data (Unaudited):	Reported*			Adjustment			Restated

Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(530,691	)	$	-		$	(530,691	)
Loss from operations	$	(668,940	)	$	-		$	(668,940	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	342,884		$	342,884
Loss from continuing operations	$	(668,018	)	$	342,884		$	(325,134	)
Net loss	$	(747,575	)	$	342,884		$	(404,691	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(3.59	)	$	1.64		$	(1.95	)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data (Unaudited):	Reported*			Adjustment			Restated

Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(542,538	)	$	-		$	(542,538	)
Loss from operations	$	(633,645	)	$	-		$	(633,645	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	58,413		$	58,413
Loss from continuing operations	$	(632,815	)	$	58,413		$	(574,402	)
Net loss	$	(765,963	)	$	58,413		$	(707,550	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(3.69	)	$	0.29		$	(3.40	)

* As retroactively adjusted for the 2012 reverse stock split and the 2012 discontinued operations

F-13

Impact of the Restatement

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data (Unaudited):	Reported*			Adjustment			Restated
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(737,680	)	$	(126,304	)	$	(863,984	)
Loss from operations	$	(1,093,183	)	$	(126,304	)	$	(1,219,487	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	1,542,051		$	1,542,051
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(216,819	)	$	1,415,747		$	1,198,928
Net (loss) income	$	(235,336	)	$	1,415,747		$	1,180,411
Net (loss) income per share, basic and diluted	$	(1.92	)	$	11.56		$	9.64

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data (Unaudited):	Reported*			Adjustment			Restated

Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(525,572	)	$	-		$	(525,572	)
Loss from operations	$	(930,071	)	$	-		$	(930,071	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	898,446		$	898,446
Loss from continuing operations	$	(920,828	)	$	898,446		$	(22,382	)
Net loss	$	(1,013,739	)	$	898,446		$	(115,293	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(7.91	)	$	7.01		$	(0.90	)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data (Unaudited):	Reported*			Adjustment			Restated

Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(417,260	)	$	-		$	(417,260	)
Loss from operations	$	(788,587	)	$	-		$	(788,587	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	134,827		$	134,827
Loss from continuing operations	$	(787,992	)	$	134,827		$	(653,165	)
Net loss	$	(913,318	)	$	134,827		$	(778,491	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(7.13	)	$	1.05		$	(6.08	)

* As retroactively adjusted for the 2012 reverse stock split and the 2012 discontinued operations

F-14

Impact of the Restatement

	Year Ended December 31, 2011
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data:	Reported*			Adjustment			Restated
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(2,317,403	)	$	(230,604	)	$	(2,548,007	)
Loss from operations	$	(3,963,342	)	$	(230,604	)	$	(4,193,946	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	3,716,812		$	3,716,812
Loss on issuance of warrants	$	-		$	(4,983	)	$	(4,983	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(3,078,111	)	$	3,481,225		$	403,114
Net (loss) income	$	(3,461,640	)	$	3,481,225		$	19,585
Net (loss) income per share, basic	$	(26.37	)	$	26.52		$	0.15
Net (loss) income per share, diluted	$	(26.37	)	$	21.23		$	(5.14	)

	Year Ended December 31, 2010
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data:	Reported*			Adjustment			Restated
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(3,175,350	)	$	(165,365	)	$	(3,340,715	)
Loss from operations	$	(8,006,738	)	$	(165,365	)	$	(8,172,103	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	1,556,161		$	1,556,161
Loss from continuing operations	$	(7,731,521	)	$	1,390,796		$	(6,340,725	)
Net loss	$	(7,736,242	)	$	1,390,796		$	(6,345,446	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(85.67	)	$	15.40		$	(70.27	)

	Year Ended December 31, 2009
	As Previously						As
Statement of Operations Data:	Reported			Adjustment			Restated
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	(3,055,473	)	$	(136,752	)	$	(3,192,225	)
Loss from operations	$	(9,877,082	)	$	(136,752	)	$	(10,013,834	)
Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants	$	-		$	957,422		$	957,422
Loss from continuing operations	$	(9,839,436	)	$	820,670		$	(9,018,766	)
Net loss	$	(9,148,631	)	$	820,670		$	(8,327,961	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(124.36	)	$	11.16		$	(113.20	)

* As retroactively adjusted for the 2012 reverse stock split and the 2012 discontinued operations

F-15

Impact of the Restatement

	As of March 31, 2012
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited):	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	639,097	$	791,601		$	1,430,698
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	43,394,988	$	(6,805,964	)	$	36,589,024
Accumulated deficit	$	38,302,840	$	(6,014,363	)	$	32,288,477
Total stockholders' equity	$	4,627,383	$	(791,601	)	$	3,835,782

	As of June 30, 2012
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited):	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	679,960	$	448,717		$	1,128,677
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	43,401,195	$	(6,805,964	)	$	36,595,231
Accumulated deficit	$	39,050,415	$	(6,357,247	)	$	32,693,168
Total stockholders' equity	$	3,886,015	$	(448,717	)	$	3,437,298

	As of September 30, 2012
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited):	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	793,960	$	389,913		$	1,183,873
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	43,420,333	$	(6,805,964	)	$	36,614,369
Accumulated deficit	$	39,816,415	$	(6,415,697	)	$	33,400,718
Total stockholders' equity	$	3,139,190	$	(390,304	)	$	2,748,886

* As retroactively adjusted for the 2012 reverse stock split

F-16

Impact of the Restatement

	As of March 31, 2011
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited):	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	818,816	$	1,826,897		$	2,645,713
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	41,135,829	$	(5,454,110	)	$	35,681,719
Accumulated deficit	$	33,920,581	$	(3,627,213	)	$	30,293,368
Total stockholders' equity	$	6,750,475	$	(1,826,897	)	$	4,923,578

	As of June 30, 2011
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited):	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	741,041	$	928,451		$	1,669,492
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	41,135,586	$	(5,454,110	)	$	35,681,476
Accumulated deficit	$	34,934,320	$	(4,525,659	)	$	30,408,661
Total stockholders' equity	$	5,736,493	$	(928,451	)	$	4,808,042

	As of September 30, 2011
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited):	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	807,153	$	793,624		$	1,600,777
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	41,135,586	$	(5,454,110	)	$	35,681,476
Accumulated deficit	$	35,847,638	$	(4,660,486	)	$	31,187,152
Total stockholders' equity	$	4,823,175	$	(793,624	)	$	4,029,551

	As of December 31, 2011
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data:	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	940,357	$	916,621		$	1,856,978
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	42,326,320	$	(6,609,312	)	$	35,717,008
Accumulated deficit	$	37,146,885	$	(5,692,691	)	$	31,454,194
Total stockholders' equity	$	4,714,665	$	(916,621	)	$	3,798,044

* As retroactively adjusted for the 2012 reverse stock split

F-17

Impact of the Restatement

	As of December 31, 2010
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited):	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	2,576,853	$	1,841,826		$	4,418,679
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	38,590,239	$	(4,053,292	)	$	34,536,947
Accumulated deficit	$	33,685,245	$	(2,211,466	)	$	31,473,779
Total stockholders' equity	$	4,440,219	$	(1,841,826	)	$	2,598,393

	As of December 31, 2009
	As Previously					As
Balance Sheet Data (Unaudited):	Reported*		Adjustment			Restated
Total liabilities	$	2,883,432	$	1,128,278		$	4,969,132
Paid-in capital in excess of par value	$	33,685,656	$	(1,948,948	)	$	31,736,708
Accumulated deficit	$	25,949,003	$	(820,670	)	$	25,128,333
Total stockholders' equity	$	7,271,876	$	(1,128,278	)	$	6,143,598

* As retroactively adjusted for the 2012 and 2011 reverse stock splits

F-18

3. Liquidity

We continue to incur ongoing administrative and other expenses, including public company expenses, without any corresponding revenue. If we re-commence our pharmaceutical development efforts, we will begin to incur substantial development costs and will not likely receive any revenue for the foreseeable future.

Until such time as we earn revenue from our pharmaceutical development business or from a new business venture, we intend to finance our activities through:

·	the remaining proceeds of our equity offerings; and

·	additional funds we will seek to raise through the sale of additional securities in the future.

Working capital was $4.0 million and $4.6 million at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and cash on hand was $4.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Management believes that this cash on hand will be sufficient to sustain operations for the next twelve months.

In early December 2012, we sold the stock of our subsidiary Spherix Consulting, Inc. for nominal consideration. This sale allows the Company to minimize its administrative and other costs pending completion of the Company’s review of its strategic alternatives.

In November 2012, the Company obtained net proceeds of approximately $2.3 million in a private placement of common stock and warrants. The Company sold an aggregate of 483,657 shares of common stock at a price of $5.324 per share along with warrants to purchase an additional 483,657 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.53 per share. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five years. The Company has agreed to register the common stock sold in the offering and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Failure on the part of the Company to satisfy certain registration deadlines may subject the Company to payment of certain monetary penalties. The investors have agreed to temporarily waive their right to cause the Company to register these shares. The investors have the right to participate for 100% of any future debt or equity offerings of the Company during the two years following the Closing.

In early 2013, nearly all of the warrants issued in November 2012 were exchanged for shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.

In February 2012, the Company obtained net proceeds of approximately $1.1 million in a registered direct offering of common stock and warrants. Both the common stock issued in the offering and the underlying common stock for the warrants issued in the offering were previously registered under a Form S-3 shelf registration statement declared effective by the SEC in October 2009.

We believe our current capital is inadequate to pursue business opportunities, which we may desire to pursue in the future and as a result we anticipate we will need to raise additional funds from time to time, which could take the form of debt, equity, convertible securities or a combination of the above. We may be required to raise capital at prices that are below our current market capitalization value.

The Company cannot be assured that it will be able to attract an investor in our securities or raise the additional funds it will likely require in the future; that the Company will be able to obtain any required stockholder approval; or that the Company will be able to successfully complete additional offerings or sales of its securities. If we reach a point where we are unable to raise needed additional funds to continue our business activities, we will be forced to cease our business activities in which case the Company could also be required to terminate its operations and dissolve. However, we believe that the Company presently has sufficient cash balances to continue as a going concern for the next 12 months based upon its reduced requirements for salaries and other expenses following the disposition of the consulting segment and the reduced activity of its research and development program.

F-19

4. Accounts Receivable

Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, in general, collateral is not required. Management regularly reviews accounts receivable for uncollectible and potentially uncollectible accounts, and when necessary establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts. Balances that are outstanding after management has used reasonable collection efforts are written-off through a charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to accounts receivable.

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 and $8,000, respectively.

Balance, January 1, 2011	$	-
Provision for doubtful accounts		8,000
Balance December 31, 2011		8,000
Bad debt recovery		(8,000	)
Balance December 31, 2012	$	-

5. Property and Equipment

The components of property and equipment as of December 31, at cost are:

	2012			2011
Computers	$	9,000		$	7,000
Office furniture and equipment		94,000			94,000
Leasehold improvements		229,000			229,000
Total cost		332,000			330,000
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(308,000	)		(245,000	)
Property and equipment, net	$	24,000		$	85,000

The Company’s depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $64,000 and $66,000, respectively.

6. Patents and Intangible Assets

The Company’s amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $0 and $2,000 on patents with an original value of $53,000, of which $2,000 and $51,000 expired in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

7. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following at December 31:

	2012		2011

Accounts payable	$	210,000	$	106,000
Accrued expenses		218,000		164,000
	$	428,000	$	270,000

8. Accrued Salaries and Benefits

Accrued salaries and benefits consisted of the following at December 31:

	2012		2011

Accrued Payroll	$	21,000	$	29,000
Accrued annual bonuses		173,000		176,000
Accrued severance		40,000		-
Accrued vacation		42,000		38,000
Other		4,000		-
	$	280,000	$	243,000

F-20

9. Warrant Liability

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had approximately $3.1 million and $0.9 million of warrant liabilities, respectively, and recognized $1.2 million and $3.7 million in other income from changes in fair value of warrants, respectively.

	Warrant		Exercise		Estimated fair value				Change in estimated fair value
Date	Shares		Price		2012		2011		2012			2011
11/16/2009		5,522	$	650.00	$	-	$	41,000	$	(40,000	)	$	(524,000	)
11/16/2009		414	$	575.00		-		-		-			(1,000	)
10/7/2010		10,500	$	300.00		3,000		157,000		(154,000	)		(1,069,000	)
10/7/2010		630	$	312.50		-		-		-			(50,000	)
1/19/2011		10,673	$	160.00		7,000		184,000		(177,000	)		(1,277,000	)
1/19/2011		640	$	162.50		-		1,000		(1,000	)		(65,000	)
10/25/2011		26,628	$	44.80		106,000		528,000		(422,000	)		(709,000	)
10/25/2011		799	$	59.13		-		6,000		(6,000	)		(22,000	)
2/2/2012		10,648	$	28.00		49,000		-		(144,000	)		-
2/2/2012		1,597	$	27.00		-		-		(21,000	)		-
11/8/2012		483,657	$	6.53		2,960,000		-		(237,000	)		-
						3,125,000	$	917,000	$	(1,202,000	)	$	(3,717,000	)

The Company used the following assumptions in the Black-Scholes calculation used to measure the fair value of warrants at December 31, 2011 and 2012 (as retroactively adjusted for the 2012 and 2011 reverse stock splits).

As of December 31, 2011
Grant Date	11/16/09			10/07/10			01/19/11			10/25/11
Shares		5,522			10,500			10,673			26,628
Stock price	$	23.40		$	23.40		$	23.40		$	23.40
Exercise price	$	650.00		$	300.00		$	160.00		$	44.80
Expected terms (yrs)		2.9			3.8			4.1			4.8
Risk-free interest rate		0.36	%		0.60	%		0.60	%		0.83	%
Estimated volatility		144.55	%		156.71	%		156.71	%		143.85	%

As of December 31, 2012
Grant Date	11/16/09			10/07/10			01/19/11			10/25/11			02/02/12			11/08/12
Shares		5,522			10,500			10,673			26,628			10,648			483,657
Stock price	$	6.83		$	6.83		$	6.83		$	6.83		$	6.83		$	6.83
Exercise price	$	650.00		$	300.00		$	160.00		$	44.80		$	28.00		$	6.53
Expected terms (yrs)		1.9			2.8			3.1			3.8			4.1			4.9
Risk-free interest rate		0.25	%		0.36	%		0.36	%		0.54	%		0.54	%		0.72	%
Estimated volatility		110.99	%		101.94	%		101.94	%		133.28	%		133.28	%		146.03	%

As of the date of issuance for warrants issued in 2011 and 2012
Grant Date	01/19/11			10/25/11			02/02/12			11/08/12
Shares		10,673			26,628			10,648			483,657
Stock price	$	155.00		$	51.40		$	20.60		$	7.31
Exercise price	$	160.00		$	44.80		$	28.00		$	6.53
Expected terms (yrs)		5			5			5			5
Risk-free interest rate		1.95	%		1.01	%		0.71	%		0.65	%
Estimated volatility		138.7	%		144.6	%		144.7	%		146.0	%

F-21

10. Stockholders’ Equity

Equity Offerings

On November 7, 2012, the Company obtained net proceeds of approximately $2.3 million in a private placement of common stock and warrants. The Company sold an aggregate of 483,657 shares of common stock at a price of $5.324 per share along with warrants to purchase an additional 483,657 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.53 per share. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants are exercisable for a period of five years. The common stock and warrants were issued in a private placement of securities exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The warrants are classified as a liability and the common stock is classified as permanent equity. The investors shall have the right to participate for 100% of any future debt or equity offerings of the Company during the two years following the Closing. Certain of these warrants were exchanged for shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in early 2013.

On February 2, 2012, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors to sell an aggregate of 53,241 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase up to an additional 10,648 shares of its common stock to such investors for gross proceeds of approximately $1.15 million. The common stock and warrants were sold in units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.2 of a share of common stock. The purchase price per unit was $21.60. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants are exercisable at any time commencing six (6) months after the initial issue date and on or prior to August 7, 2017, but not thereafter, at an exercise price of $28.00 per share. The net proceeds to the Company from the registered direct offering, after deducting placement agent fees and the Company’s offering expenses, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the warrants issued in the offering, were approximately $1.1 million. The common stock issued in the February 2012 offering and the common stock that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of the warrants have been registered pursuant to a Form S-3 registration statement (File No. 333-161531), which became effective on October 1, 2009. The warrants are classified as a liability and the common stock is classified as permanent equity.

In connection with the closing of our February 2012 offering, the Company issued to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, as partial consideration for its services as placement agent, warrants to purchase up to 1,597 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $27.00 per share. The estimated fair value of the warrants at the date of grant was $19,000. The warrants are exercisable at the option of the holder at any time beginning six (6) months after the closing through and including February 6, 2014. These warrants were offered and sold by us in reliance upon exemptions from the registration statement requirements by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. These warrants are classified as a liability.

In October 2011, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors to sell an aggregate of 26,628 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase up to an additional 26,628 shares of its common stock to such investors for gross proceeds of approximately $1.25 million. The common stock and warrants were sold in units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock. The purchase price per unit was $47.40. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants are exercisable for a five-year period at an exercise price of $44.80 per share. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering, after deducting placement agent fees and the Company’s offering expenses, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the warrants issued in the offering, were approximately $1.1 million. The common stock issued in the October 2011 offering and the common stock that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of the warrants were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-177748), which became effective on November 21, 2011. The warrants are classified as a liability and the common stock is classified as permanent equity.

In connection with the closing of the October 2011 offering, the Company issued to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC warrants with a term of two years to purchase 799 shares of our common stock (at an exercise price of $59.00 per share). The estimated fair value of the warrants at the date of grant was $25,000. These warrants were offered and sold by us in reliance upon exemptions from the registration statement requirements by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. These warrants are classified as a liability.

F-22

On January 19, 2011, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors to sell an aggregate of 21,345 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase up to an additional 10,673 shares of its common stock to such investors for gross proceeds of approximately $2.77 million. The common stock and warrants were sold in units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.50 of a share of common stock. The purchase price per unit was $130.00. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants are exercisable for a five-year period at an exercise price of $160.00 per share. The net proceeds to the Company from the registered direct offering, after deducting placement agent fees and the Company’s offering expenses, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the warrants issued in the offering, were approximately $2.6 million. The common stock issued in the January 2011 offering and the common stock that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of the warrants have been registered pursuant to a Form S-3 registration statement (File No. 333-161531), which became effective on October 1, 2009. The warrants are classified as a liability and the common stock is classified as permanent equity.

In connection with the closing of our January 2011 offering, the Company issued to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, as partial consideration for its services as placement agent, warrants with a term of two years to purchase up to 640 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $163 per share. The estimated fair value of the warrants at the date of grant was $42,000. These warrants were offered and sold by us in reliance upon exemptions from the registration statement requirements by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. These warrants are classified as a liability.

Restricted Stock

On December 28, 2012, the Company issued 120,000 shares of restricted stock under the Company’s 2012 Equity Compensation Plan. The total fair value of the issuances of the stock was approximately $816,000, which will be recognized as performance targets are obtained. On December 31, 2012, the Company issued 2,250 shares of restricted stock under the Company’s 2012 Equity Compensation Plan. The total fair value of the issuances of the stock was approximately $15,000, which will be recognized as expense over an eighteen month vesting period. No expense was recognized in 2012. The fair value of the stock awards was based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant.

Stock Option Plan

In late 2012, the Company adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) which permits issuance of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock. The Plan replaced a prior incentive stock plan. During 2012 and 2011, the Company granted 5,487 and 2,250 options to the Company’s Board of Directors and officers under the previous plan. Options issued to employees typically vest over a four-year period and options issued to non-employee directors vested immediately upon being granted. At December 31, 2012, there were 6,789 options under the previous plan that were fully vested. The total unrecognized stock compensation expense at December 31, 2012 is approximately $12,000, which will be recognized over 2.9 years.

The Company used the following assumptions in the Black-Scholes calculation used to measure the fair value of stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 for stock options granted in 2012 and 2011.

	11-16-2012		8-14-2012		5-15-2012		11-15-2011
Risk-free interest rate	0.62	%	0.75	%	0.74	%	0.93	%
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%	0	%	0	%
Expected life (years)	5		5		5		5
Volatility	91.3	%	111.8	%	122.7	%	130.0	%

F-23

Activity for the two years ended December 31, 2012, for all option grants is shown below:

	2012									2011
	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year		2,426		$	53.60						316		$	322.00
Granted		5,487		$	10.93						2,250		$	40.00
Exercised		-		$	-						-		$	-
Expired or forfeited		(750	)	$	40.00						(140	)	$	440.00
Outstanding at end of year		7,163		$	22.34		4.4	$	-		2,426		$	53.60
Exercisable at end of year		6,788		$	21.36		4.5	$	-		1,176
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted during the year	$	8.44								$	34.20

Price range of options
Outstanding	$	9.80-$228.00								$	40.00-$228.00
Exercised	$	-								$	-
Expired or forfeited	$	40.00								$	440.00

The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding at December 31, 2012:

		Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price		Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	9.80-$15.20		5,488	$	10.93		4.7		5,488	$	10.93
$	40.00		1,500	$	40.00		3.9		1,125	$	40.00
$	228.00		175	$	228.00		2.4		175	$	228.00
			7,163						6,788

11. Gain on Settlement of Obligations

On January 14, 2011, Biospherics Incorporated, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, filed a Complaint For Injunction Relief And Damages in The United States District Court For The District Of Maryland against Inalco S.p.A. (the “Complaint”). The Complaint alleged that Inalco had breached the 2009 Manufacturing Support and Supply Agreement as Inalco (i) refused to supply D-tagatose previously paid for by Biospherics, (ii) refused to provide a promised bank guarantee, and (iii) shut-down its D-tagatose production facilities. On March 16, 2011, both parties signed a settlement agreement whereby Inalco agreed to supply Spherix with 8.5 metric tons of D-tagatose, which has been received by Spherix, and both parties have agreed to release each other from any other obligations under the previous agreement. As a result, the Company recognized a gain of $600,000 in March 2011 on the release from its purchase obligation.

In January 2011, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with Gilbert V. Levin and M. Karen Levin pursuant to which the Company agreed to make a one-time lump sum payment of $450,000 to the Levins in full satisfaction of the Company’s obligation to make a series of continuing payments to the Levins relating to their prior employment by the Company. Per the terms of the agreement, Gilbert V. Levin resigned as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company on January 13, 2011. The Company’s estimated liability to the Levins at December 31, 2010, and prior to the above agreement was approximately $695,000. The $450,000 lump sum payment was made on January 31, 2011, and the Company recognized the $245,000 difference as a gain on settlement of obligations in January 2011.

F-24

12. Income Taxes

Income tax from continuing operations for 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

	2012		2011
U.S. Federal income tax expense	$	-	$	(13,000	)
State and local income tax expense	$	-	$	(1,000	)
Total income tax expense	$	-	$	(14,000	)

		2012		2011
Current income tax expense	$	-	$	(14,000	)
Deferred income tax expense	$	-	$	-
Total income tax expense	$	-	$	(14,000	)

The deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2011 have been restated to reflect the deferred tax assets for continuing operations only. The tax effects of significant temporary differences representing deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	2012			2011
Deferred tax assets
Deferred rent	$	17,000		$	19,000
Accrued vacation		16,000			15,000
Tax credit/grants		82,000			82,000
Deferred compensation		16,000			-
Net operating loss carryforward		16,852,000			15,467,000
Accrued bonus		68,000			68,000
Stock based compensation		45,000			25,000
Accrued expenses		38,000			38,000
Property and equipment		19,000			-
Warrants		3,683,000			2,813,000
Warrants - issuance costs		553,000			211,000
Other		1,000			5,000
Total deferred tax asset		20,837,000			18,532,000

Deferred tax liabilities
Property and equipment		-			(3,000	)
Change in accounting method - accrued bonus		-			(20,000	)
		-			(23,000	)

Valuation allowance		(20,837,000	)		(18,509,000	)

Net deferred tax asset	$	-		$	-

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had gross operating loss carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately $41.4 million and $37.9 million, respectively, which will begin to expire in 2019. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had gross operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of approximately $51.6 million and $48.6 million, respectively, which will begin to expire in 2018. Based on the Company’s historical losses and its accumulated deficit, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets.

F-25

Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and credit could be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The Company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership change under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code occurred. The effect of an ownership change would be the imposition of an annual limitation on the use of net operating loss carryforwards attributable to periods before the change and could result in a reduction in the total net operating losses and research credits available.

Reconciliation between actual tax benefits and taxes computed at the statutory Federal rate of 34 percent for 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	2012			2011
U.S. Federal income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 34%	$	982,000		$	(142,000	)
Effect of permanent differences		4,000			(9,000	)
Effect of permanent differences - Government Grant		-			4,000
Effect of permanent differences - Warrants		114,000			1,184,000
State income taxes benefit, net of federal tax benefit		99,000			251,000
Other		(1,000	)		(78,000	)
Change in valuation allowance		(1,198,000	)		(1,224,000	)
Income tax expense	$	-		$	(14,000	)

During 2010, the Company’s subsidiary, Biospherics Incorporated, received notice from the IRS that it had been awarded two grants under IRC Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code’s “Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project.” The amount received pursuant to the QTDP Grant was $0.3 million of which $0.1 million related to the income tax benefit associated with the realization or “monetization” of prior-period tax attributes for which the Company had previously established a valuation allowance.

Tax Uncertainties

The Company recognizes a tax benefit associated with an uncertain tax position when, in management’s judgment, it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority. For a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company initially and subsequently measures the tax benefit as the largest amount that it judges to have a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. The liability associated with unrecognized tax benefits is adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law developments and new or emerging legislation. The effective tax rate includes the net impact of changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and subsequent adjustments as considered appropriate by management. The Company has not recognized any such adjustments. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had no material unrecognized income tax benefits and recognized no interest or penalties on income tax liabilities.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax and state and local income tax in multiple jurisdictions. The statute of limitations for the consolidated U.S. federal income tax return is closed for all tax years up to and including 2008, except for pre-2008 tax returns that generated net operating loss carry forwards that could be adjusted on audit. Currently, no federal or state and local income tax returns are under examination by the respective taxing authorities.

F-26

13. Commitments and Contingencies

Purchase Commitments

During 2009, the Company entered into a purchase commitment with a supplier of the Company’s D-tagatose product. The agreement committed the Company to purchase 25 metric tons of D-Tagatose. The Company utilized the D-tagatose as a part of the Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials. This phase was necessary for the Company to be able to commercialize the product and as the products were not going to be available for sale, the Company wrote off the entire product value into Research and Development Costs. The amounts written off in 2009 from the agreement were $1.1 million. Of this amount $500,000 was paid in 2009 and the remaining balance of $600,000 was included in the Company’s accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2010. On March 16, 2011, both parties signed an agreement whereby Inalco agreed to supply Spherix with 8.5 metric tons of D-tagatose for amounts previously paid for and both parties agreed to release each other from any other obligations under the previous agreement. As a result, Spherix recognized a gain of $600,000 in 2011 on the release from its purchase obligation.

Leases

The Company has commitments under an operating lease through 2018 relating to its administrative office in Bethesda, Maryland. In March 2012, the Company entered into an amendment to its office building lease, which extends the term of the lease five years. The lease as amended will expire on March 31, 2018. Commencing on April 1, 2012, the base annual rent shall be $152,500, with an increase of 3% annually. In addition, the Company subsequently entered into a new lease agreement in February 2013 for office space in Tysons Corner, Virginia (see subsequent event footnote 16).

Future minimum rental payments required as of December 31, 2012, under the non-cancelable lease are as follows:

Year Ending December 31,	Operating Lease

2013	$	156,000
2014		161,000
2015		165,000
2016		170,000
2017		176,000
2018		44,000
	$	872,000

The Company’s building lease contains step rent provisions, capital improvement funding, or other tenant allowances. Minimum rental payments including allowances on this lease are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company incurred net operating lease rental expenses of approximately $155,000 and $129,000 for the years 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Related Party Transactions

At the end of December, 2012, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with an entity wholly-owned by Mr. Kesner, a director and interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to which the entity was issued 120,000 shares of common stock in exchange for its services. The shares will vest if prior to December 31, 2017, the Company: (i) closes an acquisition either approved by the stockholders or in excess of $25 million; (ii) closes a private or public financing of at least $7.5 million; (iii) sells all or substantially all of its assets; or (iv) otherwise suffers a change in control. In such an event, the affiliate shall also be entitled to a one-time payment of $250,000.

F-27

Mr. Kesner’s law firm has provided legal services to the company in late 2012 and invoiced the Company approximately $40,000 for these services and is included in accrued expenses at December 31, 2012.

On November 30, 2012, but effective as of December 3, 2013, Dr. Claire L. Kruger resigned as the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Operating Officer of the Company. In connection with Dr. Kruger’s departure, the Company paid Dr. Kruger her 2012 bonus of $143,000 and a severance of $286,000, both of which were paid during 2012. For the other departing employees the Company agreed to pay a total of $82,000 in 2012 bonuses and approximately $211,000 in severances, which were also paid during 2012.

On December 12, 2012 the Company entered into a Retention Agreement with Mr. Clayton which provides that (i) Mr. Clayton will remain as CFO of the Company through March 31, 2013 and (ii) the Company will pay Mr. Clayton a severance of $212,180 as required by the terms of his prior employment agreement.

Under employment agreements with Dr. Gilbert V. Levin and Mrs. M. Karen Levin, the Company’s founders, the Company agreed to provide Dr. and Mrs. Levin each with lifetime payments of $12,500 each quarter and to fund long-term lifetime healthcare and health insurance policies following their retirements from the Company on August 14, 2008 and January 4, 2006, respectively. At January 1, 2011, the Company’s liability for both Dr. and Mrs. Levin was estimated to be $450,000 for the lifetime payments and $245,000 for funding the long-term lifetime healthcare and health insurance policies based on actuarially determined amounts. The non-current portion of these amounts was reported on the accompanying balance sheet as deferred compensation at January 1, 2011. During 2011, the Company paid Dr. and Mrs. Levin a combined total of $24,000 in post-retirement benefits under the above agreements.

In January 2011, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with Gilbert V. Levin and M. Karen Levin pursuant to which the Company agreed to make a one-time lump sum payment of $450,000 to the Levins in full satisfaction of the Company’s obligation to make a series of continuing payments to the Levins relating to their prior employment by the Company. The Company’s estimated liability to the Levins at January 1, 2011, and prior to the above agreement, was approximately $695,000. The $450,000 lump sum payment was made on January 31, 2011, and the Company recognized a gain of $245,000 in 2011. Per the terms of the agreement, Gilbert V. Levin resigned as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company on January 13, 2011.

14. Employee Benefit Plans

The Spherix Incorporated 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is a discretionary defined contribution plan and covers substantially all employees who have attained the age of 21, have completed one year of service, and have worked a minimum of 1,000 hours in the past Plan or anniversary year.

Under provisions of the Plan, the Company, for any plan year, has contributed an amount equal to 50% of the participant’s contribution or 2.5 of the participant’s eligible compensation, whichever is less. The Company may, at its own discretion, make additional matching contributions to participants. Company contributions, net of forfeitures, amounted to $31,000 and $23,000 in each of the years 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Plan was terminated in December 2012.

15. Information by Business Segment

As a result of the sale of the Spherix Consulting subsidiary, the Company now has only one operating segment, Biospherics.

F-28

16. Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated all events or transactions after December 31, 2012 through the date the financial statements were issued.

Appointment of Interim Chief Executive Officer

On February 27, 2013, Harvey J. Kesner, age 55, was appointed interim Chief Executive Officer of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”). Mr. Kesner currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.

Nuta Technology Corp.

In early 2013 the Company created a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Nuta Technology Corp. (“Nuta”), organized under the laws of the state of Virginia with its principal offices in Tysons Corner, Virginia.

Office Lease Agreement

In February 2013, the Company entered into a Lease Agreement to lease 837 square feet of office space in Tysons Corner, Virginia. The lease runs from March 1, 2013 through August 31, 2014.

Letter of Intent

On February 15, 2013, our wholly-owned subsidiary Nuta, entered into a Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) with North South Holdings, Inc. (“North South”), the owner of patents and licenses covering various aspects of wireless communications. Pursuant to the LOI, at closing, Nuta would acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of North South in consideration for the issuance of capital stock of the Company equal to 12,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to the LOI, Nuta will be capitalized with a minimum of $2,000,000 cash at closing and will have engaged management familiar with commercialization of intellectual property assets.

The LOI has certain binding and non-binding obligations, including the acquisition consideration which is not subject to adjustment. However, the transaction is subject to various conditions to closing, including satisfactory completion of due diligence, approval of the Company’s shareholders and definitive documentation. Upon completion Nuta may seek to engage in commercialization activities related to the inventions that are the subject of the patents acquired, although there can be no assurance that such efforts would be successful.

There can be no assurance that the transactions contemplated by the LOI will be consummated.

Warrant Exchange Agreement

On March 6, 2013, the Company, and certain investors that participated in the November 2012 private placement transaction (“Investors”), entered into separate Warrant Exchange Agreements pursuant to which the Investors exchanged common stock purchase warrants acquired in the private placement transaction for shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into one (1) share of Common Stock at the option of the holder, subject to certain limitations on conversions that would result in the Investors acquiring more than 4.99%/9.99% of the outstanding voting stock of the Company. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was established on March 5, 2013 by the filing in the State of Delaware of a Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (“Certificate of Designation”).

Warrants were issued in November 2012 and were convertible for an aggregate of 483,657 shares of Common Stock. The Warrants were exercisable through November 7, 2017 at an exercise price of $6.53 per share.

F-29

Pursuant to the Warrant Exchange Agreements, the Investors received in exchange for their warrants an aggregate of 229,337 shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible into one share of Common Stock for each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. The number of shares of common stock underlying the Series C Convertible Preferred stock is the same number as would have been-issued upon a “cashless exercise” of the exchanged Warrants under the terms of the Warrants based on the one-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s Common Stock on February 28, 2013, which was $12.6439 per share, as reported by Bloomberg. The Company has agreed to register the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on the same basis as the shares of Common Stock issued in the November 2012 private placement transaction. Currently the Company is not obligated to file any registration statement for the Common Stock, or shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants, until requested by a majority of the Investors.

Rights Agreement

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company and Equity Stock Transfer, LLC, as Rights Agent, entered into a Rights Agreement which continues through December 31, 2017. The Rights Agreement provides each Stockholder of record a dividend distribution of one “right” for each outstanding share of Common Stock. Rights become exercisable at the earlier of ten days following: (1) a public announcement that an acquirer has purchased or has the right to acquire 10% or more of our Common Stock, or (2) the commencement of a tender offer which would result in an offeror beneficially owning 10% or more of our outstanding Common Stock. All rights held by an acquirer or offeror expire on the announced acquisition date, and all rights expire at the close of business on December 31, 2017, subject to further extension. Each right entitles a Stockholder to acquire, at a stated purchase price, 1/100 of a share of our preferred stock, which carries voting and dividend rights similar to one share of our Common Stock. Alternatively, a right holder may elect to purchase for the stated price an equivalent number of shares of our Common Stock at a price per share equal to one-half of the average market price for a specified period. In lieu of the stated purchase price, a right holder may elect to acquire one-half of the Common Stock available under the second option. The purchase price of the preferred stock fractional amount is subject to adjustment for certain events as described in the Agreement. At the discretion of a majority of the Board and within a specified time period, we may redeem all of the rights at a price of $0.001 per right. The Board may also amend any provisions of the Agreement prior to exercise.

Retention Agreement

In January 2013, the Company entered into a Retention Agreement with Mr. Lodder which provides that (i) Mr. Lodder will remain with the Company as an executive officer through June 30, 2013 and receive compensation at the rate previously provided to him and (ii) the Company will pay Mr. Lodder a severance of $233,398 as had been provided under the terms of his Employment Agreement, which was terminated under the terms of his Retention Agreement.

F-30

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

ASSETS	March 31, 2013 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2012
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,448,526		$	4,498,237
Trade accounts receivable		1,315			-
Other receivables		3,508			3,425
Prepaid expenses and other assets		82,206			100,474
Assets of segment held for sale		-			104,265
Total current assets		3,535,555			4,706,401

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $319,830 and $308,386		7,930			24,009
Deposit		29,504			25,625
Total assets	$	3,572,989		$	4,756,035

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	358,376		$	425,774
Accrued salaries and benefits		85,277			280,263
Liabilities of segment held for sale		10,205			25,040
Total current liabilities		453,858			731,077

Deferred rent		45,285			45,081
Warrant liabilities		215,853			3,125,393
Total liabilities		714,996			3,901,551

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity

Convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; Series B: 1 share issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012; liquidation preference $1,000 per share		-			-
Series C: 229,337 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013, and none issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012; liquidation preference $0.0001 per share		23			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 814,114 issued at at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and 813,713 outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012		82			82
Paid-in capital in excess of par value		42,330,462			36,630,406
Treasury stock, at cost, 401 shares at March 31, 2013
and December 31, 2012		(464,786	)		(464,786	)
Accumulated deficit		(39,007,788	)		(35,311,218	)
Total stockholders' equity		2,857,993			854,484
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	3,572,989		$	4,756,035

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-31

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013			2012

Revenues	$	5,761		$	-
Costs of goods sold		-			-
Gross profit		5,761			-

Operating expenses
Research and development		(43,068	)		(371,403	)
Selling, general and administrative		(873,240	)		(692,492	)
Total operating expenses		(916,308	)		(1,063,895	)
Loss from operations		(910,547	)		(1,063,895	)

Unrealized (loss) gain on the change in fair value of warrant liabilities		(2,786,395	)		339,308
Interest income		372			1,022
Loss from continuing operations		(3,696,570	)		(723,565	)
Income tax expense		-			-
Loss from continuing operations		(3,696,570	)		(723,565	)

Discontinued operations
Loss from discontinued operations		-			(110,718	)
Income tax expense		-			-
Loss from discontinued operations		-			(110,718	)

Net loss	$	(3,696,570	)	$	(834,283	)

Net loss per share, basic and diluted
Continuing operations	$	(5.35	)	$	(3.89	)
Discontinued operations	$	-		$	(0.59	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(5.35	)	$	(4.48	)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted		691,213			186,101

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-32

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(3,696,570	)	$	(834,283	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Fair value adjustment of warrant liabilities		2,786,395			(339,308	)
Issuance costs of warrants accounted for at fair value		-			17,636
Depreciation and amortization		16,079			15,888
Stock-based compensation		4,144			2,672
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade and other receivables		(1,398	)		(27,187	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		14,389			241,023
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(262,384	)		(170,851	)
Deferred rent		204			(8,600	)
Net cash used in activities of continuing operations		(1,139,141	)		(1,103,010	)
Net cash provided by (used in) activities of discontinued operations		89,430			(63,902	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,049,711	)		(1,166,912	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash used in activities of discontinued operations		-			(1,598	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(1,598	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants		-			1,150,001
Issuance cost of common stock and warrants		-			(84,000	)
Net cash provided by activities of continuing operations		-			1,066,001
Net cash provided by financing activities		-			1,066,001

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,049,711	)		(102,509	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		4,498,237			4,911,350

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	3,448,526		$	4,808,841

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for taxes	$	-		$	-

Non-cash financing activity:
Issuance of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with exchange of warrants	$	5,695,935		$	-

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-33

Spherix Incorporated and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Until the sale of Spherix Consulting, Inc. in December 2012, the Company’s (as defined below) principal segments of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”) have been Biospherics, our biotechnology research and development business, and Spherix Consulting, our technical and regulatory consulting business. On December 3, 2012, the Company sold all of the stock of Spherix Consulting, Inc. Accordingly, the operations of Spherix Consulting, Inc. are reported in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations. On December 27, 2012, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Nuta Technology Corp., (“Nuta”), which is incorporated in the state of Virginia.

In April, 2013, Nuta Technology Corp., entered into a merger agreement to acquire 100% of the outstanding stock of a company which owns various patents principally covering wireless communications (see note 12 “Subsequent Events”). If the transaction is completed, the Company will engage in commercialization activities related to the inventions that are the subject of the patents acquired.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company are unaudited and do not include all of the information and disclosures generally required for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the statements contain all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the Company’s consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2013, the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. This report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which does contain the complete information and disclosure, for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Spherix Incorporated and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Biospherics Incorporated and Nuta Technology Corp. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

2. Liquidity and Capital Resources

We continue to incur ongoing administrative and other expenses, including public company expenses, without significant corresponding revenue.

Until such time as we earn revenue from our pharmaceutical development business or from a new business venture, we intend to finance our activities through:

·	the current cash and cash equivalents on hand from our past equity offerings; and

·	additional funds we will seek to raise through the sale of additional securities in the future.

Working capital was $3.1 million and $4.0 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and cash on hand was $3.4 million and $4.5 million, respectively. Management believes that the cash on hand will be sufficient to sustain operations for at least the next twelve months, including payment of severances aggregating $146,000 in the second quarter of 2013.

The Company cannot be assured that it will be able to attract an investor in our securities or raise the additional funds it will likely require in the future, that the Company will be able to obtain any required stockholder approval for such financings, or that the Company will be able to successfully complete additional offerings or sales of its securities. If the Company is unable to raise needed additional funds to continue its business activities, it may be forced to cease business activities in which case the Company could also be required to terminate its operations and dissolve.

F-34

3. Stockholders’ Equity

Warrant Exchange Agreement

On March 6, 2013, the Company, and certain investors that participated in the November 2012 private placement transaction (“Investors”), entered into separate Warrant Exchange Agreements pursuant to which the Investors exchanged common stock purchase warrants acquired in the private placement transaction for shares of the Company’s newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into one (1) share of Common Stock at the option of the holder, subject to certain limitations on conversions that would result in the Investors acquiring more than 4.99%/9.99% of the outstanding voting stock of the Company. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was established on March 5, 2013 by the filing in the State of Delaware of a Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (“Certificate of Designation”). The liquidation preference of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is $0.0001 per share.

Pursuant to the Warrant Exchange Agreements, the Investors received in exchange for their warrants an aggregate of 229,337 shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, each convertible into one share of Common Stock for each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. The number of shares of Common Stock underlying the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is the same number as would have been-issued upon a “cashless exercise” of the exchanged warrants under the terms of the warrants based on the one-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s Common Stock on February 28, 2013, which was $12.6439 per share, as reported by Bloomberg. The Company has agreed to register the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on the same basis as the shares of Common Stock issued in the November 2012 private placement transaction. Currently the Company is not obligated to file any registration statement for the Common Stock, or shares of Common Stock underlying the warrants, until requested by a majority of the Investors.

Rights Agreement

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company and Equity Stock Transfer, LLC, as Rights Agent, entered into a Rights Agreement which continues through December 31, 2017. The Rights Agreement provides each Stockholder of record a dividend distribution of one “right” for each outstanding share of Common Stock. Rights become exercisable at the earlier of ten days following: (1) a public announcement that an acquirer has purchased or has the right to acquire 10% or more of our Common Stock, or (2) the commencement of a tender offer which would result in an offeror beneficially owning 10% or more of our outstanding Common Stock. All rights held by an acquirer or offeror expire on the announced acquisition date, and all rights expire at the close of business on December 31, 2017, subject to further extension. Each right entitles a Stockholder to acquire, for a price of $7.46, 1/100 of a share of our preferred stock, which carries voting and dividend rights similar to one share of our Common Stock. Alternatively, a right holder may elect to purchase for the stated price an equivalent number of shares of our Common Stock at a price per share equal to one-half of the average market price for a specified period. In lieu of the stated purchase price, a right holder may elect to acquire one-half of the Common Stock available under the second option. The purchase price of the preferred stock fractional amount is subject to adjustment for certain events as described in the Agreement. At the discretion of a majority of the Board and within a specified time period, we may redeem all of the rights at a price of $0.001 per right. The Board may also amend any provisions of the Agreement prior to exercise.

4. Accounts Receivable

Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, in general, collateral is not required. Management regularly reviews accounts receivable for uncollectible and potentially uncollectible accounts, and when necessary establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts. Balances that are outstanding after management has used reasonable collection efforts are written-off through a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to accounts receivable.

F-35

Table of Contents

5. Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company maintains cash balances at several banks. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At March 31, 2013, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents in excess of the FDIC limits were $3.2 million. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant risks.

6. Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). This requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the recoverability and useful lives of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation, valuation of warrants, and the valuation allowance related to the Company’s deferred tax assets. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

7. Fair Value Measurement

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Company uses three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2 — quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable

Level 3 — inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)

Financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

Fair value measurements at March 31, 2013 using

March 31, 2013

Quoted prices in

active markets for identical assets

(Level 1)

Significant

other

observable

inputs

(Level 2)

Significant

unobservable

inputs

(Level 3)

Liabilities:

Fair value of warrant liabilities

215,853

–

215,853

Fair value measurements at December 31, 2012 using

December 31, 2012

Quoted prices in

active markets for identical assets

(Level 1)

Significant

other

observable

inputs

(Level 2)

Significant

unobservable

inputs

(Level 3)

Liabilities:

Fair value of warrant liabilities

3,125,393

–

3,125,393

F-36

Table of Contents

Level 3 liabilities are valued using unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the derivative liabilities. For fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s accounting and finance department, who report to the Chief Financial Officer, determine its valuation policies and procedures. The development and determination of the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s accounting and finance department and are approved by the Chief Financial Officer.

Level 3 Valuation Techniques

Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the warrants liabilities for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. Changes in fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are analyzed each period based on changes in estimates or assumptions and recorded as appropriate.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value Level 3 financial liabilities at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. This model incorporates transaction details such as the Company’s stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as volatility.

A significant decrease in the volatility or a significant decrease in the Company’s stock price, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Changes in the values of the derivative liabilities are recorded in “Loss due to change in fair value of derivative instruments” in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

As of March 31, 2013, there were no transfers in or out of Level 3 from other levels in the fair value hierarchy.

Liabilities resulting from the Series B Warrants issued in connection with the Company’s November 2012 financing were valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the following assumptions on the following dates:

	March 31,			March 6,			December 31,
	2013			2013			2012
Warrants:
Risk-free interest rate		0.14% - 0.77	%		0.81	%		0.16% - 0.72	%
Expected volatility		96.57% - 147.28	%		147.15	%		91.79% - 146.03	%
Expected life (in years)		0.6 - 4.6			4.7			0.8 - 4.9
Expected dividend yield		-			-			-
Number of warrants		75,757			474,266			550,664
Fair value	$	215,853		$	5,695,935		$	3,125,393

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve. The expected volatility in the Black-Scholes model is based on the standard deviation of the Company’s underlying stock price's daily logarithmic returns. The expected life of the warrants was determined by the expiration date of the warrants. The expected dividend yield was based upon the fact that the Company has not historically paid dividends on its common stock, and does not expect to pay dividends on its common stock in the future.

The fair value of these warrant liabilities was $3,125,393 at December 31, 2012. The net change in fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $2,910,540, of which $2,786,395 is reported in our condensed consolidated statement of operations as an unrealized loss on the change in fair value of the warrant liabilities and $5,695,935 is a reclassification of the fair value of the warrant liabilities to stockholders’ equity in connection with the March 2013 exchange of certain Series B Warrants for 229,337 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (see note 3 “Stockholders’ Equity”). The fair value of the warrant liabilities is re-measured at the end of every reporting period and upon the exercise and/or modification of warrants. The change in fair value is reported in the condensed consolidated statement of operations as an unrealized gain or loss on the change in fair value of the warrant liabilities.

F-37

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2013		2012
Beginning balance	$	3,125,393	$	916,621
Issuance of new warrants		-		214,288
Unrealized loss (gain) on the warrant liabilities		2,786,395		(339,308)
Reclassification to stockholders’ equity		(5,695,935)		-
Ending balance	$	215,853	$	791,601

8. Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the contract price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Royalty revenue is based upon our licensees’ net sales of covered products and recognized in the respective period. On time and expense contracts revenue is recognized at contractually agreed-upon rates based upon direct labor hours expended and other direct costs incurred. Revenue for fixed-price contracts is recognized under the proportional performance method based upon labor charged in relation to total expected labor charges. Losses, if any, on contracts are recorded during the period when first determined.

9. Net Loss Per Share

Basic earnings and loss per share are computed by dividing the net income or loss applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method) and the conversion of the Company’s convertible preferred stock and warrants (using the if-converted method). Diluted loss per share excludes the shares issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and the exercise of stock options and warrants from the calculation of net loss per share if their effect would be antidilutive.

Securities that could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share consist of the following numbers of shares into which preferred stock could have been converted and shares for which outstanding options and warrants could have been exercised during the three months ending March 31, 2013 and 2012:

	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2013		March 31, 2012
Convertible preferred stock		229,341		4
Warrants to purchase common stock		75,757		67,637
Non-vested restricted stock awards		122,500		-
Options to purchase common stock		7,163		2,425
Total		434,761		70,066

10. Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Options

The Company accounts for share-based awards exchanged for employee services at the estimated grant date fair value of the award. Stock options issued under the Company’s long-term incentive plans are granted with an exercise price equal to no less than the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant and expire up to ten years from the date of grant. These options generally vest over a four- to ten-year period.

F-38

Table of Contents

The fair value of stock options granted was determined on the grant date using assumptions for risk free interest rate, the expected term, expected volatility, and expected dividend yield. The risk free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the expected term of the option. The expected term assumption is determined using the weighted average midpoint between vest and expiration for all individuals within the grant. The expected volatility assumption is based on the standard deviation of the Company’s underlying stock price’s daily logarithmic returns. The Company’s model includes a zero dividend yield assumption, as the Company has not historically paid nor does it anticipate paying dividends on its common stock. The Company’s model does not include a discount for post-vesting restrictions, as the Company has not issued awards with such restrictions. The periodic expense is then determined based on the valuation of the options, and at that time an estimated forfeiture rate is used to reduce the expense recorded. The Company’s estimate of pre-vesting forfeitures is primarily based on the Company’s historical experience and is adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures as the options vest.

The Company recognized $1,072 in stock-based compensation expense during the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, relating to the vesting of stock options, and had $11,256 of unrecognized compensation, as of that date, which will be recognized over the 3.1 years. For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized $2,672 in stock-based compensation expense.

A summary of option activity under the Company’s employee stock option plan for the three months ended March 31, 2013, is presented below:

Options	Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2012		7,163	$	22.34		4.4
Granted		-	$	-
Exercised		-	$	-
Expired or forfeited		-	$	-
Outstanding at March 31, 2013		7,163	$	22.34		4.2	$	-
Options exercisable at March 31, 2012		6,789	$	21.36		4.2	$	-

Restricted Stock Awards

A restricted stock award entitles the recipient to receive shares of unrestricted common stock upon vesting of the award and expiration of the restrictions. The fair value of each restricted stock award is determined upon granting of the shares and the related compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period and charged to the operations as non-cash compensation expense. Shares contained in the unvested portion of restricted stock awards are forfeited upon termination of employment, unless otherwise agreed. The fair value of restricted stock issued under the Plan is determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.

A summary of the restricted stock award activity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is as follows:

	Number of Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2013		122,500	$6.83
Granted		-
Vested		-
Forfeited		-
Nonvested at March 31, 2013		122,500	$6.83

F-39

Table of Contents

The Company incurred $3,072 and $0 in compensation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the restricted stock awards previously granted. At March 31, 2013, unrecognized compensation expense associated with the restricted stock awards was $12,287, which will be amortized over approximately 1.0 year.

At the end of December 2012, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with an entity wholly-owned by Mr. Kesner, then a member of the board of directors of the Company, pursuant to which the entity was issued 120,000 shares of common stock in exchange for it services. The shares will vest if prior to December 31, 2017, the Company; (i) closes an acquisition either approved by the stockholders or in excess of $25 million; (ii) closes a private or public financing of at least $7.5 million; (iii) sells all or substantially all of its assets; or (iv) otherwise suffers a change in control. In such an event, the affiliate shall also be entitled to a one-time payment of $250,000. Expense is recognized upon satisfaction of the above contingencies. No expense was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company has commitments under an operating lease through March 31, 2018 relating to its administrative office in Bethesda, Maryland. In addition, the Company entered into a lease agreement in February 2013 to lease 837 square feet of office space in Tysons Corner, Virginia. The Virginia lease runs from March 1, 2013 through August 31, 2014.

Future minimum rental payments required as of March 31, 2013, remaining under the non-cancelable leases are as follows:

	Operating
Year Ending December 31,	Leases

2013	$	134,755
2014		176,014
2015		165,427
2016		170,390
2017		175,502
2018		44,197
	$	866,285

The Bethesda, Maryland office lease contains step rent provisions, capital improvement funding, or other tenant allowances. The Tysons Corner, Virginia office lease contains step rent provision. Minimum rental payments including allowances on the leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases. The Company incurred net operating lease rental expenses of approximately $39,473 and $32,616 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Related Party Transactions

In January 2013, the Company entered into a Retention Agreement with its President, Dr. Robert A. Lodder, which provides that (i) Dr. Lodder will remain with the Company as an executive officer through June 30, 2013 and receive compensation at the rate previously provided to him and (ii) the Company will pay Dr. Lodder a severance of $233,398 as had been provided under the terms of his Employment Agreement, which was terminated under the terms of his Retention Agreement.

On February 27, 2013, Harvey J. Kesner, age 55, was appointed interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Kesner currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.

F-40

Table of Contents

Effective March 29, 2013, Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”) agreed to extend the term of the retention agreement with Robert L. Clayton as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary through June 30, 2013 under the same terms as the December 2012 Retention Agreement.

12. Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated all events or transactions after March 31, 2013 through the date the condensed consolidated financial statements were issued.

Memorandum of Understanding with ChromaDex

On May 2, 2013, the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding with ChromaDex Corp. to extend the commercial market for D-tagatose, extend the structure function claims for the GRAS food ingredient, and to optimize a new system of D-tagatose production.

Merger Agreement

On April 2, 2013, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with its wholly owned subsidiary, Nuta Technology Corp., a Virginia corporation (“Nuta”), North South Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("North South"), the owner or assignee of certain patents, licenses and applications (the “North South Intellectual Property”), and the shareholders of North South (the "North South Shareholders"). Upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Merger Agreement (the "Merger"), North South will merge with and into Nuta with Nuta as the surviving corporation. Nuta will operate in the State of Virginia as the record owner of the North South Intellectual Property. The closing of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of a fairness opinion that the Merger Consideration (as defined below) is fair to stockholders and the Company from a financial point of view, based on, among other things, the North South Intellectual Property assets, and the approval of the Company’s shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding voting capital of the Company to issue the Merger Consideration pursuant to NASDAQ listing standards.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger, at the closing of the Merger, all issued and outstanding shares of North South’s capital stock will be converted into the right to receive an aggregate of 118,483 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 1,488,152 shares of the Company’s newly designated Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series D Preferred Stock”), which is convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock on a one-for-ten basis (collectively with the 118,483 shares of Common Stock, the “Merger Consideration”). Each holder of Series D Preferred Stock is entitled to vote on all shareholder matters, equal to the number of shares of Common Stock such shares are convertible into at such time, unless the holder is precluded from affecting the conversion taking into account beneficial ownership limitations and conversion limits as set forth in the Certificate of Designation.

At the effective time of the Merger, from the Merger Consideration, 150,000 shares of the Series D Preferred Stock (the “Escrow Shares”) shall be delivered to an escrow agent and shall be held pursuant to an escrow agreement to secure the Company from certain claims that may arise with respect to the representations, warranties, covenants or indemnification obligations of the North South Shareholders for a period of twelve (12) months following the closing of the Merger. The Escrow Shares are the sole remedy for indemnifiable losses payable under the Merger Agreement.

Option Grants

F-41

Table of Contents

The 2013 Plan authorizes approximately 17% or our fully-diluted Common Stock (2,800,000 shares) be reserved for issuance under the Plan, after giving effect to the shares of our capital stock issuable under the Merger. On April 4, 2013, the Company issued 2,010,500 option shares to executives of the Company and certain outside consultants under the 2013 Plan, subject to shareholder approval of the 2013 Plan. The total fair value of the options on the date of grant was approximately $11.2 million under the Black-Scholes model of valuing options.

Set forth below is information relating to the option grants under the 2013 Plan.

				Exercise
Name		Number of Options		Price		Experation
Harvey Kesner	(1)		1,000,000	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Douglas Brown	(2)		75,000	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Edward Karr	(2)		75,000	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Robert Vander Zander	(2)		75,000	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Robert Clayton	(3)		5,000	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Executive Group			1,230,000
Consultant	(4)		750,000	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Consultant	(5)		25,000	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Consultant	(6)		5,000	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Other staff			500	$	7.08	4/1/2023
Total			2,010,500

(1)

750,000 options vest in 4 equal semi-annual installments beginning on October 4, 2013 as long as the shareholders have approved the 2013 Plan. Remaining 250,000 options are subject to certain performance conditions requiring the Company to achieve a VWAP of $12 per share for 30 out of 90 consecutive days prior to December 31, 2014 and provided Optionee remains a director.

(2)	Eligibility date of October 4, 2013, provided Optionee remains a director of Spherix through said date.

(3)	Eligibility effective immediately upon shareholder approval.

(4)	Eligibility upon the last to occur of (i) shareholder approval of Plan, (ii) closing of merger of North South Holdings, Inc. into Nuta Technology Corp, and (iii) Optionee’s employment as the Chief Executive Officer of Spherix.

(5)	Eligibility effective immediately upon shareholder approval.

(6)	Eligibility effective immediately upon shareholder approval.

Conversion of Preferred Stock

In May 2013, 6,805 shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock were converted to 6,805 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001, leaving 229,337 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding.

F-42

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Restatement

As discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, the 2011 consolidated financial statements presented here have been restated to give effect to correction of a misstatement in the classification of the Company’s outstanding warrants.

On February 27, 2013, Company management, in consultation with its Audit Committee, revised its prior position on accounting for warrants and concluded that its previously issued consolidated financial statements for all periods since mid-November 2009 (collectively, the “Affected Periods”) should not be relied on because of a misapplication in the guidance on accounting for Warrants (as defined below) . However, the non-cash adjustments to the financial statements, in all of the Affected Periods, do not impact the amounts previously reported for the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, total assets, revenue, or cash flows.

The warrants at issue (collectively, the “Warrants”) include:

(i)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,522 and 414 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in November 2009 at an exercise price of $650.00 and $575.00 per share, respectively;

(ii)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,500 and 630 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in October 2010 at an exercise price of $300.00 and $312.50 per share, respectively;

(iii)

warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,673 and 640 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in January 2011 at an exercise price of $160.00 and $162.50 per share, respectively;

(iv)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 26,628 and 799 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in October 2011 at an exercise price of $44.80 and $59.13 per share, respectively;

(v)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,648 and 1,597 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in February 2012 at an exercise price of $28.00 and $27.00 per share, respectively; and

(vi)	warrants to purchase an aggregate of 483,657 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued in November 2012 at an exercise price of $6.53 per share;

The above warrant shares and exercise prices have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 2011 and 2012 reverse stock splits.

Historically, the Warrants were reflected as a component of equity as opposed to liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statements of operations did not include the subsequent non-cash changes in estimated fair value of the Warrants in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The Warrant agreements contain a provision for net cash settlement at the option of the holder in the event that there is a fundamental transaction (as contractually defined in the Warrant agreements). The Company had previously conducted in-depth analysis in prior years of its other warrants and concluded that all fundamental transactions were within the control of the Company and thus equity treatment for the warrants was appropriate. However, new insight on derivatives, obtained by the Company during the process of analyzing the accounting guidance for the November 2012 warrants, prompted the Company to re-assess its prior position.

-55-

Under the guidance of ASC 815, warrant instruments that could potentially require net cash settlement in the absence of express language precluding such settlement, should be initially classified as derivative liabilities at their estimated fair values, regardless of the likelihood that such instruments will ever be settled in cash. In periods subsequent to issuance, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative instruments should be reported in the statement of operations. The Audit Committee, together with management, determined that the financial statements in the Affected Periods should be restated to reflect the Warrants as liabilities, with subsequent changes in their estimated fair value recorded as non-cash income or expense in each Affected Period.

In addition to the restatement noted above, the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011and the consolidated balance sheets then ended have also been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the Company’s September 2012 reverse stock splits, and for the discontinued operations as discussed in note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation.”

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations incorporates the restated amounts. For this reason, the information set forth in this section may not be comparable to discussion and information in our previously filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Overview

The Company previously operated via two principal segments, Biospherics and Health Sciences through December 3, 2012. Biospherics seeks to develop proprietary products for commercial application. Health Sciences provided technical and regulatory consulting services to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, as well as provided technical support for the Biospherics segment.

During the periods covered by this report, the Company had two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Biospherics Incorporated and Spherix Consulting, Inc., for its two operating segments. The Company provides management, strategic guidance, business development, marketing and other services to its subsidiaries. The operations of Spherix Consulting, Inc. have been retroactively adjusted as discontinued operations as a result of the December 3, 2012 sale of the subsidiary (as more fully described below).

On September 21, 2012, the Company effected a reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock at an exchange ratio of 1-for-20. The reverse stock split reduced the December 31, 2011 and 2010 number of outstanding shares of Common Stock from 3,094,961 and 2,135,588 shares to 154,749 and 106,781 shares, respectively. Following the reverse stock split, the Company regained compliance with NASDAQ’s minimum bid price rule.

In November 2012, following completion of a private placement offering, the Company expanded its Board of Directors from six to seven members. The expanded Board undertook a review of the Company’s cash balances and capital requirements for its drug development and consulting segments. The Company concluded that the prospect of raising the significant amount of capital needed to successfully advance its drug development opportunities, which were in an early stage of development, would not be available to it in the foreseeable future given the state of the capital markets, making it unlikely that the Company could continue to support its drug development and consulting businesses. The Company’s Board of Directors in reviewing its options determined to undertake a major re-examination of its business strategies and to explore strategic alternatives. Immediate action was taken to reduce expenses, and the decision was made to terminating the employment contracts of employees of the consulting business, and to either cease the consulting business or dispose of it for nominal consideration. Further the Board was reduced to four members. To facilitate any transition to a new business and continue to satisfy our other responsibilities, retention agreements were entered into with Dr. Lodder as President, Mr. Clayton as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary, and Ms. Barton as Executive Assistant. The Company’s review and evaluation of its existing business is continuing and this effort may result in the further divestiture or winding down of our historic businesses and the possible entry into a new, yet identified business, including via acquisitions.

-56-

In mid-November, 2012, the Board of Directors and the holders of approximately 70% of our common stock approved the following actions, which became effective on December 17, 2012:

·	an increase in our authorized capital stock to 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

·	the adoption of the Spherix Incorporated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, pursuant to which up to 125,000 shares of common stock may be issued to employees, officers and directors via stock options and grants of restricted stock; and

·	approval of the issuance of up to 483,657 shares of our common stock pursuant to the exercise of our Series B Warrants issued in our November 2012 private placement transaction.

On December 3, 2012, the Company sold all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of its consulting subsidiary, Spherix Consulting, Inc. for nominal consideration of less than $1,000.

On November 30, 2012, but effective as of December 3, 2013, Dr. Claire L. Kruger resigned as the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Dr. Robert A. Lodder, Aris Melissaratos and Thomas B. Peter also resigned as members of our Board of Directors.

On November 30, 2012, but effective as of December 3, 2012, the Company appointed Dr. Robert A. Lodder as the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Robert L. Clayton as Secretary of the Company.

In late 2012, the Company entered into a new five (5) year shareholder rights plan.

In February, 2013, a newly formed Virginia subsidiary of the Company, Nuta Technology Corp., entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire various patents covering wireless communications. If the acquisition is completed, the Company may engage in commercialization activities related to the inventions that are the subject of such patents.

In late February, 2013, the Board of Directors appointed Harvey J. Kesner as interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

In early March, 2013, we issued Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for warrants we issued in our November, 2012 private placement transaction.

The Company is examining its business strategies and strategic alternatives. It has deferred any substantial financial commitments in its Biospherics unit.

Results of Operations—2012 Compared with 2011

Revenue

Revenue in 2012 is primarily related to royalty fees from an oil detection agreement. No substantial revenue is expected from the Biospherics segment until the Company is successful in selling or licensing its technology.

-57-

Research and Development

Research and development expenditures relate solely to the Biospherics segment and consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, fees paid to consultants and outside service providers, and other expenses related to our efforts to develop SPX106T for use in lowering triglyceride and cholesterol levels. We expense our research and development costs as they are incurred. The Company does not intend to incur any material R&D costs for its Biospherics unit in 2013 or thereafter and currently is seeking buyers to acquire the Biospherics inventory and business in whole or in part or to joint venture or license such business. The Company believes it is unlikely that a buyer may be identified and as a result may liquidate or dispose of its inventory of Tagatose for which material storage fees are being incurred. The Company may be required to incur costs for disposal and cessation of this segment.

The decrease in R & D costs in 2012 of $919,000 from 2011 reflects the completion of SPX106T preclinical studies. No further studies are presently planned.

Selling, General and Administrative

Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants

Other Income from change in fair value of warrants is the result of decreases in the carrying amount of the warrant liability caused by changes in the fair value as determined using a Black-Scholes option valuation method. The difference between the other income from change in fair value of warrants realized in 2011 compared to 2012 is the result of a more pronounced change in the Company’s stock price for the year ending 2011.

Loss on Issuance of Warrants

The loss on issuance of warrants reflects the difference in the fair market value of the warrants as determined using a Black-Scholes option valuation method and the proceeds received. The proceeds received from warrants issued with other instruments (such as common stock or preferred stock) are determined based upon the fair value of liability classified warrants with the residual allocated to the other instruments. The increase between years is directly related to the change in the Company’s stock price between years.

Interest Income

Interest income in 2012 and 2011 was primarily derived from interest earned on the net proceeds of our equity offerings.

Other Income

In October 2010, the Company was awarded two one-time grants from the U.S. Government under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The awards were for the Company’s diabetes and triglyceride research. As a result, in 2011 the Company recognized $51,000 in other income and a related tax expense of $14,000. No grants were recognized in 2012.

-58-

Gain on Settlement of Obligations

Income Tax Expense

The 2011 income tax expense was directly related to the above mentioned U.S. government grants in the Other Income discussion. No tax expense was incurred in 2012.

Discontinued Operations

The operations of Spherix Consulting, Inc. have been retroactively adjusted as discontinued operations as a result of the December 3, 2012 sale noted above. The Spherix Consulting segment generated nearly all of the Company’s revenue and provided technical support for the Company’s Biospherics segment.

	2012			2011
Revenue	$	728,312		$	820,925

Direct cost and operating expense		(417,428	)		(388,065	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		(1,279,875	)		(816,389	)
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes	$	(968,991	)	$	(383,529	)

Sales Backlog

None

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of the contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenue and expenses for the period reported. Estimates are based upon historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are evaluated periodically and form the basis for making judgments regarding the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported amount of revenue and expenses. Actual results may differ substantially from these estimates.

Spherix’s critical accounting policies are those it believes are the most important in determining its financial condition and results, and require significant subjective judgment by management as a result of inherent uncertainties. A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is set out in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Such policies are discussed below.

-59-

~~Accounting for Taxes~~Research and ~~Valuation Allowances~~

We currently have significant deferred tax assets, resulting from net operating loss carry forwards. These deferred tax assets may reduce taxable income in future periods. Based on the Company’s losses and its accumulated deficit, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset. Cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall assessment of valuation allowances.

Development

~~We expect~~

Research and development expenditures relate solely to ~~continue~~the Biospherics segment and consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, fees paid to ~~maintain a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until an appropriate level of profitability is sustained, or we are able~~consultants and outside service providers, and other expenses related to our efforts to develop ~~tax strategies that would enable us~~SPX106T for use in lowering triglyceride and cholesterol levels. We expense our research and development costs as they are incurred. The Company does not intend to ~~conclude that~~incur any material R&D costs for its Biospherics unit in 2013 or thereafter and currently is seeking buyers to acquire the Biospherics inventory and business in whole or in part or to joint venture or license such business. The Company believes it is ~~more likely than not~~unlikely that a ~~portion~~buyer may be identified and as a result may liquidate or dispose of ~~our deferred tax assets would~~its inventory of Tagatose for which material storage fees are being incurred. The Company may be ~~realizable.~~

~~Accounting~~required to incur costs for ~~warrants~~disposal and cessation of this segment.

The ~~Company accounts~~decrease in R & D costs in 2012 of $919,000 from 2011 reflects the completion of SPX106T preclinical studies. No further studies are presently planned.

Selling, General and Administrative

Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for executive, finance and other administrative personnel, professional fees and other corporate expenses, including facilities-related expenses. S,G&A expenses were consistent between years. Severance/retention expense for the ~~issuance of Common Stock purchase warrants issued in connection with~~continuing staff is being recognized evenly over the equity offerings in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

~~The Company assessed the classification of its Common Stock purchase warrants as of~~required performance period from the date of each ~~offering and through December 31,~~agreement, with $40,000 recognized in 2012 and ~~determined that such instruments met~~ the ~~criteria for liability classification. The warrants are reported on~~remaining $475,000 to be recognized during the ~~consolidated balance sheet as a liability at~~first half of 2013. No severance expenses were incurred in 2011.

Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants

Other Income from change in fair value of warrants is the result of decreases in the carrying amount of the warrant liability caused by changes in the fair value as determined using ~~the~~a Black-Scholes option valuation method. ~~Changes~~The difference between the other income from change in fair value of warrants realized in 2011 compared to 2012 is the result of a more pronounced change in the ~~estimated~~Company’s stock price for the year ending 2011.

Loss on Issuance of Warrants

The loss on issuance of warrants reflects the difference in the fair market value of the warrants ~~result~~as determined using a Black-Scholes option valuation method and the proceeds received. The proceeds received from warrants issued with other instruments (such as common stock or preferred stock) are determined based upon the fair value of liability classified warrants with the residual allocated to the other instruments. The increase between years is directly related to the change in the ~~recognition of other~~Company’s stock price between years.

Interest Income

Interest income ~~or expense.~~

~~New Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~In June~~in 2012 and 2011 ~~the FASB issued a new accounting standard~~was primarily derived from interest earned on the ~~presentation~~net proceeds of comprehensive income. The new standard requires the presentation of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB deferred the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income, while still requiring entities to adopt the other requirements. We adopted the new standard on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this standard had no impact on our consolidated financial statements. In February of 2013, the FASB issued a new accounting standard to improve the transparency of reporting reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income by requiring entities to present in one place information about significant amounts reclassified and, in some cases, to provide cross-references to related footnotes. We are required to adopt the requirements for reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income as of the beginning of 2013. We do not expect this adoption to have a material impact on our financial statements.equity offerings.

Other Income

In ~~May~~October 2010, the Company was awarded two one-time grants from the U.S. Government under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The awards were for the Company’s diabetes and triglyceride research. As a result, in 2011 the ~~FASB issued~~Company recognized $51,000 in other income and a ~~new accounting standard which was an amendment to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements~~related tax expense of $14,000. No grants were recognized in GAAP and international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”). The amendments explain how to measure fair value and will improve the comparability of fair value measurement presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and IFRS. The standard requires new quantitative and qualitative disclosures about the sensitivity of recurring Level 3 measurement disclosures, as well as transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. This authoritative guidance is to be applied prospectively. The standard was effective and adopted by the Company during 2012.

~~-60-~~-58-

~~Liquidity~~Gain on Settlement of Obligations

On January 14, 2011, Biospherics Incorporated, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, filed a Complaint For Injunction Relief And Damages in The United States District Court For The District Of Maryland against Inalco S.p.A. (the “Complaint”). The Complaint alleged that Inalco had breached the 2009 Manufacturing Support and ~~Capital Resources~~Supply Agreement as Inalco (i) refused to supply D-tagatose previously paid for by Biospherics, (ii) refused to provide a promised bank guarantee, and (iii) shut-down its D-tagatose production facilities. On March 16, 2011, both parties signed a settlement agreement whereby Inalco agreed to supply Spherix with 8.5 metric tons of D-tagatose, which has been received by Spherix, and both parties have agreed to release each other from any other obligations under the previous agreement. As a result, the Company recognized a gain of $600,000 in March 2011 on the release from its purchase obligation.

~~We continue~~In January 2011, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with Gilbert V. Levin and M. Karen Levin pursuant to ~~incur ongoing administrative and other expenses, including public company expenses, without any corresponding revenue. If we re-commence our pharmaceutical development efforts, we will begin~~which the Company agreed to ~~incur substantial development costs and will not likely receive any revenue for~~make a one-time lump sum payment of $450,000 to the ~~foreseeable future.~~

~~Until such time~~Levins in full satisfaction of the Company’s obligation to make a series of continuing payments to the Levins relating to their prior employment by the Company. Per the terms of the agreement, Gilbert V. Levin resigned as ~~we earn revenue from our pharmaceutical development business or from~~ a ~~new business venture, we intend~~member of the Board of Directors of the Company on January 13, 2011. The Company’s estimated liability to ~~finance our activities through:~~

·	~~the remaining proceeds of our equity offerings; and~~

·	~~additional funds we will seek to raise through the sale of additional securities in the future.~~

~~Working capital was $4.0 million and $4.6 million~~the Levins at December 31, ~~2012~~2010, and ~~December~~prior to the above agreement was approximately $695,000. The $450,000 lump sum payment was made on January 31, 2011, and ~~cash~~the Company recognized the $245,000 difference as a gain on ~~hand~~settlement of obligations in January 2011.

Income Tax Expense

The 2011 income tax expense was ~~$4.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Management believes that this cash on hand will be sufficient~~directly related to ~~sustain operations for~~ the ~~next twelve months, including payment of severances aggregating $475,000 which are to be paid~~above mentioned U.S. government grants in the ~~first half of 2013.~~Other Income discussion. No tax expense was incurred in 2012.

~~In early December 2012, we sold the stock~~Discontinued Operations

The operations of ~~our subsidiary~~ Spherix Consulting, Inc. ~~for nominal consideration. This~~have been retroactively adjusted as discontinued operations as a result of the December 3, 2012 sale ~~allows the Company to minimize its administrative and other costs pending completion~~noted above. The Spherix Consulting segment generated nearly all of the Company’s ~~review of its strategic alternatives.~~revenue and provided technical support for the Company’s Biospherics segment.

~~In November 2012, the Company obtained net proceeds~~

	2012			2011
Revenue	$	728,312		$	820,925

Direct cost and operating expense		(417,428	)		(388,065	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		(1,279,875	)		(816,389	)
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes	$	(968,991	)	$	(383,529	)

Sales Backlog

None

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of ~~approximately $2.3 million~~financial statements in ~~a private placement of common stock and warrants. The Company sold an aggregate of 483,657 shares of common stock at a price of $5.324 per share along~~conformity with warrants to purchase an additional 483,657 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.53 per share. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five years. The Company has agreed to register the common stock soldaccounting principles generally accepted in the ~~offering~~United States of America (“US GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the ~~common stock issuable upon exercise~~disclosure of the ~~warrants. Failure on~~contingent assets and liabilities at the ~~part~~date of the ~~Company~~financial statements and revenue and expenses for the period reported. Estimates are based upon historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to ~~satisfy certain registration deadlines may subject~~be reasonable under the ~~Company to payment~~circumstances. These estimates are evaluated periodically and form the basis for making judgments regarding the carrying values of certain monetary penalties. The investors have agreed to temporarily waive their right to cause the Company to register these shares. The investors have the right to participate for 100% of any future debt or equity offerings of the Company during the two years following the Closing.

~~In February 2012, the Company obtained net proceeds of approximately $1.1 million in a registered direct offering of common stock~~assets and ~~warrants. Both the common stock issued in the offering~~liabilities and the ~~underlying common stock for~~reported amount of revenue and expenses. Actual results may differ substantially from these estimates.

Spherix’s critical accounting policies are those it believes are the ~~warrants issued~~most important in ~~the offering were previously registered under a Form S-3 shelf registration statement declared effective~~determining its financial condition and results, and require significant subjective judgment by ~~the SEC in October 2009.~~

~~We believe our current capital is inadequate to pursue business opportunities via acquisition, which we may desire to pursue in the future and~~management as a result ~~we anticipate we will need to raise additional funds from time to time, which could take the form~~ of ~~debt, equity, convertible securities or a combination~~inherent uncertainties. A summary of the ~~above. We may be required to raise capital at prices that are below our current market capitalization value.~~

~~The Company cannot be assured that it will be able to attract an investor in our securities or raise the additional funds it will likely require~~Company’s significant accounting policies is set out in the ~~future; that~~notes to the Company will be able to obtain any required stockholder approval; or that the Company will be able to successfully complete additional offerings or sales of its securities. If we reach a point where weconsolidated financial statements. Such policies are unable to raise needed additional funds to continue our business activities, we will be forced to cease our business activities in which case the Company could also be required to terminate its operations and dissolve. However, we believe that the Company presently has sufficient cash balances to continue as a going concern for the next 12 months based upon its reduced requirements for salaries and other expenses following the disposition of the consulting segment and the reduced activity of its research and development program.discussed below.

~~-61-~~-59-

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012~~

~~Overview~~

Until the sale of Spherix Consulting, Inc. in December 2012, our principal segments have been Biospherics, our biotechnology research and development business, and Spherix Consulting, a technical and regulatory consulting business. On December 3, 2012, the Company sold all of the stock of Spherix Consulting, Inc. Accordingly, the operations of Spherix Consulting, Inc. are reported in the accompanying financial statements as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In 2013, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Nuta Technology Corp.

Following the sale of Spherix Consulting, the Company engaged in an examination of its business strategies and strategic alternatives. The Company has determined to augment its biotechnology research and development business with a new business segment, monetization of intellectual property assets. To that end, on April 2, 2013, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with its wholly owned subsidiary, Nuta and North South Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("North South"), the owner or assignee of certain patents, licenses and applications (the “North South Intellectual Property”), and the shareholders of North South (the "North South Shareholders"). Upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Merger Agreement (the "Merger"), North South will merge with and into Nuta with Nuta as the surviving corporation. Nuta will operate in the State of Virginia as the record owner of the North South Intellectual Property. The closing of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of a fairness opinion that the Merger Consideration (as defined below) is fair to stockholders and the Company from a financial point of view, based on, among other things, the North South Intellectual Property assets, and the approval of the Company’s shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding voting capital of the Company to issue the Merger Consideration pursuant to NASDAQ listing standards.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger, at the closing of the Merger, all outstanding shares of North South’s capital stock will be converted into the right to receive an aggregate of 118,483 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 1,488,152 shares of the Company’s newly designated Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series D Preferred Stock”), which is convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock on a one-for-ten basis (collectively with the 118,483 shares of Common Stock, the “Merger Consideration”).

The Company has filed a preliminary consent solicitation with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) seeking shareholder approval of the issuance of the Merger Consideration. Upon clearance by the SEC, the Company will forward the consent solicitation to the shareholders in an effort to obtain such approval.

~~Biospherics has been active in efforts to develop pharmaceuticals. Our strategy to achieve this development has been to:~~

·	~~utilize our clinical development experience to manage and drive drug candidates through the clinical development process to approval;~~

·	~~identify and explore licensing and partnership opportunities for drug candidates;~~

·	~~seek to acquire medically important drug candidates in early-stage to mid-stage clinical development; and~~

·	~~commercialize our drug candidates, either alone or more likely in partnership.~~

We previously conducted a Phase 3 trial to determine efficacy of D-tagatose as a treatment for Type 2 diabetes and a Phase 2 Dose Range trial to evaluate the effectiveness of lower doses of D-tagatose in treating Type 2 diabetes. In spite of favorable Phase 3 and Phase 2 results, in 2010 we determined that continued development of D-tagatose as a treatment for Type 2 diabetes required the involvement of a pharma partner with the resources needed to fund the rest of the development and bring it to market. We believe we obtained favorable Phase III results and are seeking a Pharma or other partner to fund additional Phase III clinical trials and a cardiovascular safety study requested by the FDA, which could require substantial expenditures.

~~-62-~~

More recently, the Company focused its studies on treating high triglycerides and other dyslipidemias with a combination of D-tagatose and SPX106, a licensed drug compound, which combination is referred to as SPX106T. High triglyceride levels are sometimes a symptom of conditions associated with heart disease such as obesity and metabolic syndrome, which is a condition associated with elevated glucose levels as well as excess fat around the waist, high blood pressure, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, and other dyslipidemias.

Biospherics and the University of Kentucky Research Foundation (‘UKRF”) have a License Agreement pursuant to which UKRF has granted Biospherics an exclusive worldwide license to commercialize certain compounds including SPX106. Upon commercialization, UKRF is entitled to royalties generally equal to 3% of net sales. UKRF has the right to terminate the license agreement if Biospherics fails to continue its commercialization efforts.

~~In early May 2013, the Company announced that it will explore the prospects for a more efficient process for the production of D-tagatose with a goal of selling D-tagatose as a food ingredient.~~

~~D-tagatose is a natural sweetener present in only small amounts in fruits and dairy products, but it can be commercially produced through an enzymatic process beginning with other natural sugars.~~ With the same bulk and sweetness of regular sugar (i.e., sucrose) and no after-taste, D-tagatose is an ideal solution for sweet and savory products. D-tagatose has a documented prebiotic effect and a low caloric value of 1.5 kcal per gram. D-tagatose has a glycemic and insulin index of only 3% of that of glucose.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, Spherix entered into an agreement granting Fullife, India, an exclusive, royalty bearing license for the use of Spherix's clinical data and proprietary knowledge to support the marketing and dosing of D-tagatose and is supplying D-tagatose from its inventory. Bio Foods, Chile, has exchanged a nonbinding term sheet with Spherix for D-tagatose’s introduction in Chile. Spherix entered into a nondisclosure agreement with WIO ~~Smart~~ ~~Foods LLC, Utah, and began selling D-tagatose for use in WIO~~ ~~Smart~~ Foods product line. WIO certifies bariatric clinics and diet clinics to use its proprietary meal replacement plan to promote weight loss. WIO focuses on helping people with the metabolic syndrome, which is characterized by obesity, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. The Company is seeking to expand the structure function claims for D-tagatose make it more valuable than a simple artificial sweetener.

The biggest problem with widespread adoption of tagatose is the cost of production. ChromaDex has agreed to provide support in seeking more efficient scalable processes for the production of tagatose. We selected ChromaDex in part in order to obtain the assistance of their principal investigator, the Director of New Technologies and Supply Chain Development, who brings 14 years of experience in business, operations, and R&D management to the task, and previously participated in the introduction of the Truvia ® ~~brand stevia artificial sweetener for Cargill Health and Nutrition. ChromaDex also obtained a right of first refusal for marketing and selling the new D-tagatose.~~

~~In late February, 2013, the Board of Directors appointed Harvey J. Kesner as interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company.~~

~~In early March, 2013, we issued Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for certain warrants we issued in our November, 2012 private placement transaction.~~

~~Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012~~

~~Revenue~~

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company earned $4,000 from the sale of D-tagatose and $1,760 on royalties from an oil detection licensing agreement. No substantial revenue is expected from the Biospherics segment until the Company is successful in selling or licensing its technology.

~~-63-~~

Research and Development

The decrease in R & D costs in 2012 of $919,000 from 2011 reflects the completion of SPX106T preclinical studies. No further studies are presently planned.

Selling, General and Administrative

Other Income from Change in Fair Value of Warrants

Loss on Issuance of Warrants

Interest Income

Interest income in 2012 and 2011 was primarily derived from interest earned on the net proceeds of our equity offerings.

Other Income

-58-

Gain on Settlement of Obligations

Income Tax Expense

The 2011 income tax expense was directly related to the above mentioned U.S. government grants in the Other Income discussion. No tax expense was incurred in 2012.

Discontinued Operations

	2012			2011
Revenue	$	728,312		$	820,925

Direct cost and operating expense		(417,428	)		(388,065	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		(1,279,875	)		(816,389	)
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes	$	(968,991	)	$	(383,529	)

Sales Backlog

None

Critical Accounting Estimates

-59-

Accounting for Taxes and Valuation Allowances

We expect to continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until an appropriate level of profitability is sustained, or we are able to develop tax strategies that would enable us to conclude that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets would be realizable.

Accounting for warrants

The Company assessed the classification of its Common Stock purchase warrants as of the date of each offering and through December 31, 2012 and determined that such instruments met the criteria for liability classification. The warrants are reported on the consolidated balance sheet as a liability at fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation method. Changes in the estimated fair value of the warrants result in the recognition of other income or expense.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the presentation of comprehensive income. The new standard requires the presentation of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB deferred the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income, while still requiring entities to adopt the other requirements. We adopted the new standard on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this standard had no impact on our consolidated financial statements. In February of 2013, the FASB issued a new accounting standard to improve the transparency of reporting reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income by requiring entities to present in one place information about significant amounts reclassified and, in some cases, to provide cross-references to related footnotes. We are required to adopt the requirements for reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income as of the beginning of 2013. We do not expect this adoption to have a material impact on our financial statements.

-60-

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Until such time as we earn revenue from our pharmaceutical development business or from a new business venture, we intend to finance our activities through:

·	the remaining proceeds of our equity offerings; and

·	additional funds we will seek to raise through the sale of additional securities in the future.

We believe our current capital is inadequate to pursue business opportunities via acquisition, which we may desire to pursue in the future and as a result we anticipate we will need to raise additional funds from time to time, which could take the form of debt, equity, convertible securities or a combination of the above. We may be required to raise capital at prices that are below our current market capitalization value.

-61-

Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

Overview

Biospherics has been active in efforts to develop pharmaceuticals. Our strategy to achieve this development has been to:

·	utilize our clinical development experience to manage and drive drug candidates through the clinical development process to approval;

·	identify and explore licensing and partnership opportunities for drug candidates;

·	seek to acquire medically important drug candidates in early-stage to mid-stage clinical development; and

·	commercialize our drug candidates, either alone or more likely in partnership.

-62-

In early May 2013, the Company announced that it will explore the prospects for a more efficient process for the production of D-tagatose with a goal of selling D-tagatose as a food ingredient.

D-tagatose is a natural sweetener present in only small amounts in fruits and dairy products, but it can be commercially produced through an enzymatic process beginning with other natural sugars. With the same bulk and sweetness of regular sugar (i.e., sucrose) and no after-taste, D-tagatose is an ideal solution for sweet and savory products. D-tagatose has a documented prebiotic effect and a low caloric value of 1.5 kcal per gram. D-tagatose has a glycemic and insulin index of only 3% of that of glucose.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, Spherix entered into an agreement granting Fullife, India, an exclusive, royalty bearing license for the use of Spherix's clinical data and proprietary knowledge to support the marketing and dosing of D-tagatose and is supplying D-tagatose from its inventory. Bio Foods, Chile, has exchanged a nonbinding term sheet with Spherix for D-tagatose’s introduction in Chile. Spherix entered into a nondisclosure agreement with WIO SmartFoods LLC, Utah, and began selling D-tagatose for use in WIO SmartFoods product line. WIO certifies bariatric clinics and diet clinics to use its proprietary meal replacement plan to promote weight loss. WIO focuses on helping people with the metabolic syndrome, which is characterized by obesity, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. The Company is seeking to expand the structure function claims for D-tagatose make it more valuable than a simple artificial sweetener.

The biggest problem with widespread adoption of tagatose is the cost of production. ChromaDex has agreed to provide support in seeking more efficient scalable processes for the production of tagatose. We selected ChromaDex in part in order to obtain the assistance of their principal investigator, the Director of New Technologies and Supply Chain Development, who brings 14 years of experience in business, operations, and R&D management to the task, and previously participated in the introduction of the Truvia® brand stevia artificial sweetener for Cargill Health and Nutrition. ChromaDex also obtained a right of first refusal for marketing and selling the new D-tagatose.

In late February, 2013, the Board of Directors appointed Harvey J. Kesner as interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

In early March, 2013, we issued Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for certain warrants we issued in our November, 2012 private placement transaction.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

Revenue

-63-

Research and Development

Research and development (“R&D”) expenditures relate solely to the Biospherics segment and consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, fees paid to consultants and outside service providers, and other expenses related to our efforts to develop SPX106T for use in lowering triglyceride and cholesterol levels. We expense our research and development costs as they are incurred, including the Company’s supply of D-tagatose, of which the Company maintained an estimated 8 metric tons at March 31, 2013. The decrease in R & D costs of $328,000 from $371,403 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to $43,068 for the same period in 2013 reflects the completion of SPX106T preclinical studies in late 2012.

Selling, General and Administrative

Our selling, general and administrative (“S,G&A”) expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for executive, finance and other administrative personnel, professional fees and other corporate expenses, including facilities-related expenses. S,G&A increased $181,000 to $873,240 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $692,492 in the comparable prior year period. Severance/retention expense for the continuing staff is being recognized evenly over the required performance period from the date of each agreement, with $288,000 recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and none in the corresponding period in 2012. This increase was partially offset by an otherwise general decrease in S,G&A spending during the first quarter of 2013. The remaining $146,000 in severance/retention expense will be recognized during the second quarter of 2013.

Unrealized (Loss) Gain on the Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liabilities

Unrealized (loss) gain on the change in fair value of warrant liabilities is the result of the change in the carrying amount of the warrant liability caused by changes in the fair value as determined using a Black-Scholes option valuation method. The change between years was the result of an increase in the Company’s stock price during the first quarter of 2013, which resulted in the unrealized loss in that period.

Interest

Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was consistent with the prior year and primarily derived from interest earned on the net proceeds of our equity offerings.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We continue to incur ongoing administrative and other expenses, including public company expenses, without significant corresponding revenue.

Until such time as we earn revenue from our pharmaceutical development business or from a new business venture, we intend to finance our activities through:

·	the current cash and cash equivalents on hand from our past equity offerings; and

·	additional funds we will seek to raise through the sale of additional securities in the future.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

-64-

Appendix A

SPHERIX INCORPORATED

2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

1.	PURPOSE OF PLAN

1.1 The purpose of this 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (this “Plan”) of Spherix Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), is to promote the success of the Corporation and to increase stockholder value by providing an additional means through the grant of awards to attract, motivate, retain and reward selected employees and other eligible persons.

2.	ELIGIBILITY

2.1 The Administrator (as such term is defined in Section 3.1) may grant awards under this Plan only to those persons that the Administrator determines to be Eligible Persons. An “Eligible Person” is any person who is either: (a) an officer (whether or not a director) or employee of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries; (b) a director of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries; or (c) an individual consultant who renders bona fide services (other than services in connection with the offering or sale of securities of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries in a capital-raising transaction or as a market maker or promoter of securities of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries) to the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries and who is selected to participate in this Plan by the Administrator; provided, however, that a person who is otherwise an Eligible Person under clause (c) above may participate in this Plan only if such participation would not adversely affect either the Corporation’s eligibility to use Form S-8 to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the offering and sale of shares issuable under this Plan by the Corporation, or the Corporation’s compliance with any other applicable laws. An Eligible Person who has been granted an award (a “participant”) may, if otherwise eligible, be granted additional awards if the Administrator shall so determine. As used herein, “Subsidiary” means any corporation or other entity a majority of whose outstanding voting stock or voting power is beneficially owned directly or indirectly by the Corporation; and “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

3.	PLAN ADMINISTRATION

3.1 The Administrator. This Plan shall be administered by and all awards under this Plan shall be authorized by the Administrator. The “Administrator” means the Board or one or more committees appointed by the Board or another committee (within its delegated authority) to administer all or certain aspects of this Plan. Any such committee shall be comprised solely of one or more directors or such number of directors as may be required under applicable law. A committee may delegate some or all of its authority to another committee so constituted. The Board or a committee comprised solely of directors may also delegate, to the extent permitted by Section 157 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and any other applicable law, to one or more officers of the Corporation, its powers under this Plan (a) to Eligible Persons who will receive grants of awards under this Plan, and (b) to determine the number of shares subject to, and the other terms and conditions of, such awards. The Board may delegate different levels of authority to different committees with administrative and grant authority under this Plan. Unless otherwise provided in the bylaws of the Corporation or the applicable charter of any Administrator: (a) a majority of the members of the acting Administrator shall constitute a quorum, and (b) the affirmative vote of a majority of the members present assuming the presence of a quorum or the unanimous written consent of the members of the Administrator shall constitute due authorization of an action by the acting Administrator.

With respect to awards intended to satisfy the requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), this Plan shall be administered by a committee consisting solely of two or more outside directors (as this requirement is applied under Section 162(m) of the Code); provided, however, that the failure to satisfy such requirement shall not affect the validity of the action of any committee otherwise duly authorized and acting in the matter. Award grants, and transactions in or involving awards, intended to be exempt under Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), must be duly and timely authorized by the Board or a committee consisting solely of two or more non-employee directors (as this requirement is applied under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act). To the extent required by any applicable stock exchange, this Plan shall be administered by a committee composed entirely of independent directors (within the meaning of the applicable stock exchange). Awards granted to non-employee directors shall not be subject to the discretion of any officer or employee of the Corporation and shall be administered exclusively by a committee consisting solely of independent directors.

A-1

3.2 Powers of the Administrator. Subject to the express provisions of this Plan, the Administrator is authorized and empowered to do all things necessary or desirable in connection with the authorization of awards and the administration of this Plan (in the case of a committee or delegation to one or more officers, within the authority delegated to that committee or person(s)), including, without limitation, the authority to:

(a) determine eligibility and, from among those persons determined to be eligible, the particular Eligible Persons who will receive awards under this Plan;

(b) grant awards to Eligible Persons, determine the price at which securities will be offered or awarded and the number of securities to be offered or awarded to any of such persons, determine the other specific terms and conditions of such awards consistent with the express limits of this Plan, establish the installments (if any) in which such awards shall become exercisable or shall vest (which may include, without limitation, performance and/or time-based schedules), or determine that no delayed exercisability or vesting is required, establish any applicable performance targets, and establish the events of termination or reversion of such awards;

(c) approve the forms of award agreements (which need not be identical either as to type of award or among participants);

(d) construe and interpret this Plan and any agreements defining the rights and obligations of the Corporation, its Subsidiaries, and participants under this Plan, further define the terms used in this Plan, and prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the administration of this Plan or the awards granted under this Plan;

(e) cancel, modify, or waive the Corporation’s rights with respect to, or modify, discontinue, suspend, or terminate any or all outstanding awards, subject to any required consent under Section 8.6.5;

(f) accelerate or extend the vesting or exercisability or extend the term of any or all such outstanding awards (in the case of options or stock appreciation rights, within the maximum ten-year term of such awards) in such circumstances as the Administrator may deem appropriate (including, without limitation, in connection with a termination of employment or services or other events of a personal nature) subject to any required consent under Section 8.6.5;

(g) adjust the number of shares of Common Stock subject to any award, adjust the price of any or all outstanding awards or otherwise change previously imposed terms and conditions, in such circumstances as the Administrator may deem appropriate, in each case subject to compliance with applicable stock exchange requirements, Sections 4 and 8.6 and the applicable requirements of Code Section 162(m) and treasury regulations thereunder with respect to awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), and provided that in no case (except due to an adjustment contemplated by Section 7 or any repricing that may be approved by stockholders) shall such an adjustment constitute a repricing (by amendment, cancellation and regrant, exchange or other means) of the per share exercise or base price of any stock option or stock appreciation right or other award granted under this Plan, and further provided that any adjustment or change in terms made pursuant to this Section 3.2(g) shall be made in a manner that, in the good faith determination of the Administrator will not likely result in the imposition of additional taxes or interest under Section 409A of the Code;

(h) determine the date of grant of an award, which may be a designated date after but not before the date of the Administrator’s action (unless otherwise designated by the Administrator, the date of grant of an award shall be the date upon which the Administrator took the action granting an award);

(i) determine whether, and the extent to which, adjustments are required pursuant to Section 7 hereof and authorize the termination, conversion, substitution, acceleration or succession of awards upon the occurrence of an event of the type described in Section 7;

(j) acquire or settle (subject to Sections 7 and 8.6) rights under awards in cash, stock of equivalent value, or other consideration; and

(k) determine the Fair Market Value (as defined in Section 5.6) of the Common Stock or awards under this Plan from time to time and/or the manner in which such value will be determined.

A-2

3.3 Binding Determinations. Any action taken by, or inaction of, the Corporation, any Subsidiary, or the Administrator relating or pursuant to this Plan and within its authority hereunder or under applicable law shall be within the absolute discretion of that entity or body and shall be conclusive and binding upon all persons. Neither the Board, the Administrator, nor any Board committee, nor any member thereof or person acting at the direction thereof, shall be liable for any act, omission, interpretation, construction or determination made in good faith in connection with this Plan (or any award made under this Plan), and all such persons shall be entitled to indemnification and reimbursement by the Corporation in respect of any claim, loss, damage or expense (including, without limitation, legal fees) arising or resulting therefrom to the fullest extent permitted by law and/or under any directors and officers liability insurance coverage that may be in effect from time to time.

3.4 Reliance on Experts. In making any determination or in taking or not taking any action under this Plan, the Administrator may obtain and may rely upon the advice of experts, including professional advisors to the Corporation. The Administrator shall not be liable for any such action or determination taken or made or omitted in good faith based upon such advice.

3.5 Delegation of Non-Discretionary Functions. In addition to the ability to delegate certain grant authority to officers of the Corporation as set forth in Section 3.1, the Administrator may also delegate ministerial, non-discretionary functions to individuals who are officers or employees of the Corporation or any of its Subsidiaries or to third parties.

4.	SHARES OF COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN; SHARE LIMIT

4.1 Shares Available. Subject to the provisions of Section 7.1, the capital stock available for issuance under this Plan shall be shares of the Corporation’s authorized but unissued Common Stock. For purposes of this Plan, “Common Stock” shall mean the common stock of the Corporation and such other securities or property as may become the subject of awards under this Plan, or may become subject to such awards, pursuant to an adjustment made under Section 7.1.

4.2 Share Limit. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted to Eligible Persons under this Plan may not exceed 2,800,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Share Limit”).

The foregoing Share Limit is subject to adjustment as contemplated by Section 4.3, Section 7.1, and Section 8.10.

4.3 Awards Settled in Cash, Reissue of Awards and Shares. The Administrator may adopt reasonable counting procedures to ensure appropriate counting, avoid double counting (as, for example, in the case of tandem or substitute awards) and make adjustments in accordance with this Section 4.3. Shares shall be counted against those reserved to the extent such shares have been delivered and are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Accordingly, (i) to the extent that an award under the Plan, in whole or in part, is canceled, expired, forfeited, settled in cash, settled by delivery of fewer shares than the number of shares underlying the award, or otherwise terminated without delivery of shares to the participant, the shares retained by or returned to the Corporation will not be deemed to have been delivered under the Plan and will be deemed to remain or to become available under this Plan; and (ii) shares that are withheld from such an award or separately surrendered by the participant in payment of the exercise price or taxes relating to such an award shall be deemed to constitute shares not delivered and will be deemed to remain or to become available under the Plan. The foregoing adjustments to the Share Limit of this Plan are subject to any applicable limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code with respect to awards intended as performance-based compensation thereunder.

4.4 Reservation of Shares; No Fractional Shares. The Corporation shall at all times reserve a number of shares of Common Stock sufficient to cover the Corporation’s obligations and contingent obligations to deliver shares with respect to awards then outstanding under this Plan (exclusive of any dividend equivalent obligations to the extent the Corporation has the right to settle such rights in cash). No fractional shares shall be delivered under this Plan. The Administrator may pay cash in lieu of any fractional shares in settlements of awards under this Plan.

A-3

AWARDS

5.1 Type and Form of Awards. The Administrator shall determine the type or types of award(s) to be made to each selected Eligible Person. Awards may be granted singly, in combination or in tandem. Awards also may be made in combination or in tandem with, in replacement of, as alternatives to, or as the payment form for grants or rights under any other employee or compensation plan of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries. The types of awards that may be granted under this Plan are:

5.1.1 Stock Options. A stock option is the grant of a right to purchase a specified number of shares of Common Stock during a specified period as determined by the Administrator. An option may be intended as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code (an “ISO”) or a nonqualified stock option (an option not intended to be an ISO). The award agreement for an option will indicate if the option is intended as an ISO; otherwise it will be deemed to be a nonqualified stock option. The maximum term of each option (ISO or nonqualified) shall be ten (10) years. The per share exercise price for each option shall be not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of the option. When an option is exercised, the exercise price for the shares to be purchased shall be paid in full in cash or such other method permitted by the Administrator consistent with Section 5.5.

5.1.2 Additional Rules Applicable to ISOs. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time of grant of the applicable option) of stock with respect to which ISOs first become exercisable by a participant in any calendar year exceeds $100,000, taking into account both Common Stock subject to ISOs under this Plan and stock subject to ISOs under all other plans of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries (or any parent or predecessor corporation to the extent required by and within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder), such options shall be treated as nonqualified stock options. In reducing the number of options treated as ISOs to meet the $100,000 limit, the most recently granted options shall be reduced first. To the extent a reduction of simultaneously granted options is necessary to meet the $100,000 limit, the Administrator may, in the manner and to the extent permitted by law, designate which shares of Common Stock are to be treated as shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO. ISOs may only be granted to employees of the Corporation or one of its subsidiaries (for this purpose, the term “subsidiary” is used as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code, which generally requires an unbroken chain of ownership of at least 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of each subsidiary in the chain beginning with the Corporation and ending with the subsidiary in question). There shall be imposed in any award agreement relating to ISOs such other terms and conditions as from time to time are required in order that the option be an “incentive stock option” as that term is defined in Section 422 of the Code. No ISO may be granted to any person who, at the time the option is granted, owns (or is deemed to own under Section 424(d) of the Code) shares of outstanding Common Stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Corporation, unless the exercise price of such option is at least 110% of the Fair Market Value of the stock subject to the option and such option by its terms is not exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date such option is granted.

5.1.3 Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right or “SAR” is a right to receive a payment, in cash and/or Common Stock, equal to the number of shares of Common Stock being exercised multiplied by the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the SAR is exercised, over (ii) the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the SAR was granted as specified in the applicable award agreement (the “base price”). The maximum term of a SAR shall be ten (10) years.

5.1.4 Restricted Shares.

(a) Restrictions. Restricted shares are shares of Common Stock subject to such restrictions on transferability, risk of forfeiture and other restrictions, if any, as the Administrator may impose, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future service requirements), in such installments or otherwise, as the Administrator may determine at the date of grant or thereafter. Except to the extent restricted under the terms of this Plan and the applicable award agreement relating to the restricted stock, a participant granted restricted stock shall have all of the rights of a shareholder, including the right to vote the restricted stock and the right to receive dividends thereon (subject to any mandatory reinvestment or other requirement imposed by the Administrator).

A-4

(b) Certificates for Shares. Restricted shares granted under this Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Administrator shall determine. If certificates representing restricted stock are registered in the name of the participant, the Administrator may require that such certificates bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to such restricted stock, that the Corporation retain physical possession of the certificates, and that the participant deliver a stock power to the Corporation, endorsed in blank, relating to the restricted stock. The Administrator may require that restricted shares are held in escrow until all restrictions lapse

(c) Dividends and Splits. As a condition to the grant of an award of restricted stock, subject to applicable law, the Administrator may require or permit a participant to elect that any cash dividends paid on a share of restricted stock be automatically reinvested in additional shares of restricted stock or applied to the purchase of additional awards under this Plan. Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, stock distributed in connection with a stock split or stock dividend, and other property distributed as a dividend, shall be subject to restrictions and a risk of forfeiture to the same extent as the restricted stock with respect to which such stock or other property has been distributed.

5.1.5 Restricted Share Units.

(a) Grant of Restricted Share Units. A restricted share unit, or “RSU”, represents the right to receive from the Corporation on the respective scheduled vesting or payment date for such RSU, one Common Share. An award of RSUs may be subject to the attainment of specified performance goals or targets, forfeitability provisions and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator may determine, subject to the provisions of this Plan. At the time an award of RSUs is made, the Administrator shall establish a period of time during which the restricted share units shall vest and the timing for settlement of the RSU.

(b) Dividend Equivalent Accounts. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the applicable award agreement, as well as any procedures established by the Administrator, prior to the expiration of the applicable vesting period of an RSU, the Administrator may determine to pay dividend equivalent rights with respect to RSUs, in which case, the Corporation shall establish an account for the participant and reflect in that account any securities, cash or other property comprising any dividend or property distribution with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying each RSU. Each amount or other property credited to any such account shall be subject to the same vesting conditions as the RSU to which it relates. The participant shall have the right to be paid the amounts or other property credited to such account upon vesting of the subject RSU.

(c) Rights as a Shareholder. Subject to the restrictions imposed under the terms and conditions of this Plan and the applicable award agreement, each participant receiving RSUs shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to such RSUs until such time as shares of Common Stock are issued to the participant. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued at the time a RSU is granted, and the Company will not be required to set aside a fund for the payment of any such award. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, shares of Common Stock issuable under an RSU shall be treated as issued on the first date that the holder of the RSU is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture as determined for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, and the holder shall be the owner of such shares of Common Stock on such date. An award agreement may provide that issuance of shares of Common Stock under an RSU may be deferred beyond the first date that the RSU is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, provided that such deferral is structured in a manner that is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

5.1.6 Cash Awards. The Administrator may, from time to time, subject to the provisions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine, grant cash bonuses (including without limitation, discretionary awards, awards based on objective or subjective performance criteria, awards subject to other vesting criteria or awards granted consistent with Section 5.2 below). Cash awards shall be awarded in such amount and at such times during the term of the Plan as the Administrator shall determine.

5.1.7 Other Awards. The other types of awards that may be granted under this Plan include: (a) stock bonuses, performance stock, performance units, dividend equivalents, or similar rights to purchase or acquire shares, whether at a fixed or variable price or ratio related to the Common Stock (subject to the requirements of Section 5.1.1 and in compliance with applicable laws), upon the passage of time, the occurrence of one or more events, or the satisfaction of performance criteria or other conditions, or any combination thereof; or (b) any similar securities with a value derived from the value of or related to the Common Stock and/or returns thereon.

A-5

5.2 Section 162(m) Performance-Based Awards. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any of the types of awards listed in Sections 5.1.4 through 5.1.7 above may be, and options and SARs granted with an exercise or base price not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock at the date of grant (“Qualifying Options” and “Qualifying SARs,” respectively) typically will be, granted as awards intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code (“Performance-Based Awards”). The grant, vesting, exercisability or payment of Performance-Based Awards may depend (or, in the case of Qualifying Options or Qualifying SARs, may also depend) on the degree of achievement of one or more performance goals relative to a pre-established targeted level or levels using the Business Criteria provided for below for the Corporation on a consolidated basis or for one or more of the Corporation’s subsidiaries, segments, divisions or business units, or any combination of the foregoing. Such criteria may be evaluated on an absolute basis or relative to prior periods, industry peers, or stock market indices. Any Qualifying Option or Qualifying SAR shall be subject to the requirements of Section 5.2.1 and 5.2.3 in order for such award to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. Any other Performance-Based Award shall be subject to all of the following provisions of this Section 5.2.

5.2.1 Class; Administrator. The eligible class of persons for Performance-Based Awards under this Section 5.2 shall be officers and employees of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries. The Administrator approving Performance-Based Awards or making any certification required pursuant to Section 5.2.4 must be constituted as provided in Section 3.1 for awards that are intended as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

5.2.2 Performance Goals. The specific performance goals for Performance-Based Awards (other than Qualifying Options and Qualifying SARs) shall be, on an absolute or relative basis, established based on such business criteria as selected by the Administrator in its sole discretion (“Business Criteria”), including the following: (1) earnings per share, (2) cash flow (which means cash and cash equivalents derived from either (i) net cash flow from operations or (ii) net cash flow from operations, financing and investing activities), (3) total stockholder return, (4) price per share of Common Stock, (5) gross revenue, (6) revenue growth, (7) operating income (before or after taxes), (8) net earnings (before or after interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization), (9) return on equity, (10) capital employed, or on assets or on net investment, (11) cost containment or reduction, (12) cash cost per ounce of production, (13) operating margin, (14) debt reduction, (15) resource amounts, (16) production or production growth, (17) resource replacement or resource growth, (18) successful completion of financings, or (19) any combination of the foregoing. To qualify awards as performance-based under Section 162(m), the applicable Business Criterion (or Business Criteria, as the case may be) and specific performance goal or goals (“targets”) must be established and approved by the Administrator during the first 90 days of the performance period (and, in the case of performance periods of less than one year, in no event after 25% or more of the performance period has elapsed) and while performance relating to such target(s) remains substantially uncertain within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. Performance targets shall be adjusted to mitigate the unbudgeted impact of material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting changes or other extraordinary events not foreseen at the time the targets were set unless the Administrator provides otherwise at the time of establishing the targets; provided that the Administrator may not make any adjustment to the extent it would adversely affect the qualification of any compensation payable under such performance targets as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of Code. The applicable performance measurement period may not be less than 3 months nor more than 10 years.

5.2.3 Form of Payment. Grants or awards intended to qualify under this Section 5.2 may be paid in cash or shares of Common Stock or any combination thereof.

5.2.4 Certification of Payment. Before any Performance-Based Award under this Section 5.2 (other than Qualifying Options and Qualifying SARs) is paid and to the extent required to qualify the award as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Administrator must certify in writing that the performance target(s) and any other material terms of the Performance-Based Award were in fact timely satisfied.

5.2.5 Reservation of Discretion. The Administrator will have the discretion to determine the restrictions or other limitations of the individual awards granted under this Section 5.2 including the authority to reduce awards, payouts or vesting or to pay no awards, in its sole discretion, if the Administrator preserves such authority at the time of grant by language to this effect in its authorizing resolutions or otherwise.

A-6

5.2.6 Expiration of Grant Authority. As required pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the Administrator’s authority to grant new awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code (other than Qualifying Options and Qualifying SARs) shall terminate upon the first meeting of the Corporation’s stockholders that occurs in the fifth year following the year in which the Corporation’s stockholders first approve this Plan (the “162(m) Term”).

5.2.7 Compensation Limitations. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued to any Eligible Person during the term of this Plan pursuant to Qualifying Options and Qualifying SARs may not exceed 2,800,000 shares of Common Stock. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued to any Eligible Person pursuant to Performance-Based Awards granted during the 162(m) Term (other than cash awards granted pursuant to Section 5.1.6 and Qualifying Options or Qualifying SARs) may not exceed 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock. The maximum amount that may be paid to any Eligible Person pursuant to Performance-Based Awards granted pursuant to Sections 5.1.6 (cash awards) during the 162(m) Term may not exceed $1,000,000.

5.3 Award Agreements. Each award shall be evidenced by a written or electronic award agreement in the form approved by the Administrator and, if required by the Administrator, executed by the recipient of the award. The Administrator may authorize any officer of the Corporation (other than the particular award recipient) to execute any or all award agreements on behalf of the Corporation (electronically or otherwise). The award agreement shall set forth the material terms and conditions of the award as established by the Administrator consistent with the express limitations of this Plan.

5.4 Deferrals and Settlements. Payment of awards may be in the form of cash, Common Stock, other awards or combinations thereof as the Administrator shall determine, and with such restrictions as it may impose. The Administrator may also require or permit participants to elect to defer the issuance of shares of Common Stock or the settlement of awards in cash under such rules and procedures as it may establish under this Plan. The Administrator may also provide that deferred settlements include the payment or crediting of interest or other earnings on the deferral amounts, or the payment or crediting of dividend equivalents where the deferred amounts are denominated in shares. All mandatory or elective deferrals of the issuance of shares of Common Stock or the settlement of cash awards shall be structured in a manner that is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

5.5 Consideration for Common Stock or Awards. The purchase price for any award granted under this Plan or the Common Stock to be delivered pursuant to an award, as applicable, may be paid by means of any lawful consideration as determined by the Administrator and subject to compliance with applicable laws, including, without limitation, one or a combination of the following methods:

●

services rendered by the recipient of such award;

●

cash, check payable to the order of the Corporation, or electronic funds transfer;

●

notice and third party payment in such manner as may be authorized by the Administrator;

●

the delivery of previously owned shares of Common Stock that are fully vested and unencumbered;

●

by a reduction in the number of shares otherwise deliverable pursuant to the award; or

●

subject to such procedures as the Administrator may adopt, pursuant to a “cashless exercise” with a third party who provides financing for the purposes of (or who otherwise facilitates) the purchase or exercise of awards.

A-7

In the event that the Administrator allows a participant to exercise an award by delivering shares of Common Stock previously owned by such participant and unless otherwise expressly provided by the Administrator, any shares delivered which were initially acquired by the participant from the Corporation (upon exercise of a stock option or otherwise) must have been owned by the participant at least six months as of the date of delivery (or such other period as may be required by the Administrator in order to avoid adverse accounting treatment). Shares of Common Stock used to satisfy the exercise price of an option shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise. The Corporation will not be obligated to deliver any shares unless and until it receives full payment of the exercise or purchase price therefor and any related withholding obligations under Section 8.5 and any other conditions to exercise or purchase, as established from time to time by the Administrator, have been satisfied. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the applicable award agreement, the Administrator may at any time eliminate or limit a participant’s ability to pay the purchase or exercise price of any award by any method other than cash payment to the Corporation.

5.6 Definition of Fair Market Value. For purposes of this Plan “Fair Market Value” shall mean, unless otherwise determined or provided by the Administrator in the circumstances, the closing price for a share of Common Stock on the trading day immediately before the grant date, as furnished by the NASDAQ Stock Market or other principal stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then listed for the date in question, or if the Common Stock is no longer listed on a principal stock exchange, then by the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or OTC Markets . If the Common Stock is no longer listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market or listed on a principal stock exchange or is no longer actively traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or OTC Markets as of the applicable date, the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock shall be the value as reasonably determined by the Administrator for purposes of the award in the circumstances.

5.7 Transfer Restrictions.

5.7.1 Limitations on Exercise and Transfer. Unless otherwise expressly provided in (or pursuant to) this Section 5.7, by applicable law and by the award agreement, as the same may be amended, (a) all awards are non-transferable and shall not be subject in any manner to sale, transfer, anticipation, alienation, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or charge; (b) awards shall be exercised only by the participant; and (c) amounts payable or shares issuable pursuant to any award shall be delivered only to (or for the account of) the participant.

5.7.2 Exceptions. The Administrator may permit awards to be exercised by and paid to, or otherwise transferred to, other persons or entities pursuant to such conditions and procedures, including limitations on subsequent transfers, as the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, establish in writing (provided that any such transfers of ISOs shall be limited to the extent permitted under the federal tax laws governing ISOs). Any permitted transfer shall be subject to compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws.

5.7.3 Further Exceptions to Limits on Transfer. The exercise and transfer restrictions in Section 5.7.1 shall not apply to:

(a) transfers to the Corporation,

(b) the designation of a beneficiary to receive benefits in the event of the participant’s death or, if the participant has died, transfers to or exercise by the participant’s beneficiary, or, in the absence of a validly designated beneficiary, transfers by will or the laws of descent and distribution,

(c) subject to any applicable limitations on ISOs, transfers to a family member (or former family member) pursuant to a domestic relations order if approved or ratified by the Administrator,

(d) subject to any applicable limitations on ISOs, if the participant has suffered a disability, permitted transfers or exercises on behalf of the participant by his or her legal representative, or

(e) the authorization by the Administrator of “cashless exercise” procedures with third parties who provide financing for the purpose of (or who otherwise facilitate) the exercise of awards consistent with applicable laws and the express authorization of the Administrator.

A-8

5.8 International Awards. One or more awards may be granted to Eligible Persons who provide services to the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries outside of the United States. Any awards granted to such persons may, if deemed necessary or advisable by the Administrator, be granted pursuant to the terms and conditions of any applicable sub-plans, if any, appended to this Plan and approved by the Administrator.

5.9 Vesting. Subject to Section 5.1.2 hereof, awards shall vest at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Administrator at the time of grant; provided, however, that in the absence of any award vesting periods designated by the Administrator at the time of grant in the applicable award agreement, awards shall vest as to one-third of the total number of shares subject to the award on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.

6.	EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF SERVICE ON AWARDS

6.1 Termination of Employment.

6.1.1 The Administrator shall establish the effect of a termination of employment or service on the rights and benefits under each award under this Plan and in so doing may make distinctions based upon, inter alia, the cause of termination and type of award. If the participant is not an employee of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries and provides other services to the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries, the Administrator shall be the sole judge for purposes of this Plan (unless a contract or the award agreement otherwise provides) of whether the participant continues to render services to the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries and the date, if any, upon which such services shall be deemed to have terminated.

6.1.2 For awards of stock options or SARs, unless the award agreement provides otherwise, the exercise period of such options or SARs shall expire: (1) three months after the last day that the participant is employed by or provides services to the Corporation or a Subsidiary (provided; however, that in the event of the participant’s death during this period, those persons entitled to exercise the option or SAR pursuant to the laws of descent and distribution shall have one year following the date of death within which to exercise such option or SAR); (2) in the case of a participant whose termination of employment is due to death or disability (as defined in the applicable award agreement), 12 months after the last day that the participant is employed by or provides services to the Corporation or a Subsidiary; and (3) immediately upon a participant’s termination for “cause”. The Administrator will, in its absolute discretion, determine the effect of all matters and questions relating to a termination of employment, including, but not by way of limitation, the question of whether a leave of absence constitutes a termination of employment and whether a participant’s termination is for “cause.”

If not defined in the applicable award agreement, “Cause” shall mean:

(i) conviction of a felony or a crime involving fraud or moral turpitude; or

(ii) theft, material act of dishonesty or fraud, intentional falsification of any employment or Company records, or commission of any criminal act which impairs participant’s ability to perform appropriate employment duties for the Corporation; or

(iii) intentional or reckless conduct or gross negligence materially harmful to the Company or the successor to the Corporation after a Change in Control , including violation of a non-competition or confidentiality agreement; or

(iv) willful failure to follow lawful instructions of the person or body to which participant reports; or

(v) gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of participant’s assigned duties. Cause shall not include mere unsatisfactory performance in the achievement of participant’s job objectives.

6.1.3 For awards of restricted shares, unless the award agreement provides otherwise, restricted shares that are subject to restrictions at the time that a participant whose employment or service is terminated shall be forfeited and reacquired by the Corporation; provided that, the Administrator may provide, by rule or regulation or in any award agreement, or may determine in any individual case, that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to restricted shares shall be waived in whole or in part in the event of terminations resulting from specified causes, and the Administrator may in other cases waive in whole or in part the forfeiture of restricted shares. Similar rules shall apply in respect of RSUs.

A-9

6.2 Events Not Deemed Terminations of Service. Unless the express policy of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries, or the Administrator, otherwise provides, the employment relationship shall not be considered terminated in the case of (a) sick leave, (b) military leave, or (c) any other leave of absence authorized by the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries, or the Administrator; provided that unless reemployment upon the expiration of such leave is guaranteed by contract or law, such leave is for a period of not more than 3 months. In the case of any employee of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries on an approved leave of absence, continued vesting of the award while on leave from the employ of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries may be suspended until the employee returns to service, unless the Administrator otherwise provides or applicable law otherwise requires. In no event shall an award be exercised after the expiration of the term set forth in the award agreement.

6.3 Effect of Change of Subsidiary Status. For purposes of this Plan and any award, if an entity ceases to be a Subsidiary of the Corporation, a termination of employment or service shall be deemed to have occurred with respect to each Eligible Person in respect of such Subsidiary who does not continue as an Eligible Person in respect of another entity within the Corporation or another Subsidiary that continues as such after giving effect to the transaction or other event giving rise to the change in status.

7. ADJUSTMENTS; ACCELERATION

7.1 Adjustments. Upon or in contemplation of any of the following events described in this Section 7.1,: any reclassification, recapitalization, stock split (including a stock split in the form of a stock dividend) or reverse stock split (“stock split”); any merger, arrangement, combination, consolidation, or other reorganization; any spin-off, split-up, or similar extraordinary dividend distribution in respect of the Common Stock (whether in the form of securities or property); any exchange of Common Stock or other securities of the Corporation, or any similar, unusual or extraordinary corporate transaction in respect of the Common Stock; then the Administrator shall in such manner, to such extent and at such time as it deems appropriate and equitable in the circumstances (but subject to compliance with applicable laws and stock exchange requirements) proportionately adjust any or all of (1) the number and type of shares of Common Stock (or other securities) that thereafter may be made the subject of awards (including the number of shares provided for in this Plan), (2) the number, amount and type of shares of Common Stock (or other securities or property) subject to any or all outstanding awards, (3) the grant, purchase, or exercise price (which term includes the base price of any SAR or similar right) of any or all outstanding awards, (4) the securities, cash or other property deliverable upon exercise or payment of any outstanding awards, and (5) the 162(m) compensation limitations set forth in Section 5.2.7 and (subject to Section 8.8.3(a)) the performance standards applicable to any outstanding awards (provided that no adjustment shall be allowed to the extent inconsistent with the requirements of Code section 162(m)). Any adjustment made pursuant to this Section 7.1 shall be made in a manner that, in the good faith determination of the Administrator, will not likely result in the imposition of additional taxes or interest under Section 409A of the Code. With respect to any award of an ISO, the Administrator may make such an adjustment that causes the option to cease to qualify as an ISO without the consent of the affected participant.

7.2 Change in Control. Upon a Change in Control, each then-outstanding option and SAR shall automatically become fully vested, all restricted shares then outstanding shall automatically fully vest free of restrictions, and each other award granted under this Plan that is then outstanding shall automatically become vested and payable to the holder of such award unless the Administrator has made appropriate provision for the substitution, assumption, exchange or other continuation of the award pursuant to the Change in Control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator, in its sole and absolute discretion, may choose (in an award agreement or otherwise) to provide for full or partial accelerated vesting of any award upon a Change In Control (or upon any other event or other circumstance related to the Change in Control, such as an involuntary termination of employment occurring after such Change in Control, as the Administrator may determine), irrespective of whether such any such award has been substituted, assumed, exchanged or otherwise continued pursuant to the Change in Control.

For purposes of this Plan, “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if:

(i) a tender offer (or series of related offers) shall be made and consummated for the ownership of 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation, unless as a result of such tender offer more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving or resulting corporation shall be owned in the aggregate by the stockholders of the Corporation (as of the time immediately prior to the commencement of such offer), any employee benefit plan of the Corporation or its Subsidiaries, and their affiliates;

A-10

(ii) the Corporation shall be merged or consolidated with another entity, unless as a result of such merger or consolidation more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving or resulting entity shall be owned in the aggregate by the stockholders of the Corporation (as of the time immediately prior to such transaction), any employee benefit plan of the Corporation or its Subsidiaries, and their affiliates;

(iii) the Corporation shall sell substantially all of its assets to another entity that is not wholly owned by the Corporation, unless as a result of such sale more than 50% of such assets shall be owned in the aggregate by the stockholders of the Corporation (as of the time immediately prior to such transaction), any employee benefit plan of the Corporation or its Subsidiaries and their affiliates; or

(iv) a Person (as defined below) shall acquire 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation (whether directly, indirectly, beneficially or of record), unless as a result of such acquisition more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving or resulting corporation shall be owned in the aggregate by the stockholders of the Corporation (as of the time immediately prior to the first acquisition of such securities by such Person), any employee benefit plan of the Corporation or its Subsidiaries, and their affiliates.

For purposes of this Section 5(c), ownership of voting securities shall take into account and shall include ownership as determined by applying the provisions of Rule 13d-3(d)(I)(i) (as in effect on the date hereof) under the Exchange Act. In addition, for such purposes, “Person” shall have the meaning given in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act, as modified and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof; provided, however, that a Person shall not include (A) the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; (B) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; (C) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities; or (D) a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of stock of the Company.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) the Administrator may waive the requirement described in paragraph (iv) above that a Person must acquire more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation for a Change in Control to have occurred if the Administrator determines that the percentage acquired by a person is significant (as determined by the Administrator in its discretion) and that waiving such condition is appropriate in light of all facts and circumstances, and (2) no compensation that has been deferred for purposes of Section 409A of the Code shall be payable as a result of a Change in Control unless the Change in Control qualifies as a change in ownership or effective control of the Corporation within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.

7.3 Early Termination of Awards. Any award that has been accelerated as required or permitted by Section 7.2 upon a Change in Control (or would have been so accelerated but for Section 7.4 or 7.5) shall terminate upon such event, subject to any provision that has been expressly made by the Administrator, through a plan of reorganization or otherwise, for the survival, substitution, assumption, exchange or other continuation of such award and provided that, in the case of options and SARs that will not survive, be substituted for, assumed, exchanged, or otherwise continued in the transaction, the holder of such award shall be given reasonable advance notice of the impending termination and a reasonable opportunity to exercise his or her outstanding options and SARs in accordance with their terms before the termination of such awards (except that in no case shall more than ten days’ notice of accelerated vesting and the impending termination be required and any acceleration may be made contingent upon the actual occurrence of the event).

The Administrator may make provision for payment in cash or property (or both) in respect of awards terminated pursuant to this section as a result of the Change in Control and may adopt such valuation methodologies for outstanding awards as it deems reasonable and, in the case of options, SARs or similar rights, and without limiting other methodologies, may base such settlement solely upon the excess if any of the per share amount payable upon or in respect of such event over the exercise or base price of the award.

7.4 Other Acceleration Rules. Any acceleration of awards pursuant to this Section 7 shall comply with applicable legal and stock exchange requirements and, if necessary to accomplish the purposes of the acceleration or if the circumstances require, may be deemed by the Administrator to occur a limited period of time not greater than 30 days before the event. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Administrator may deem an acceleration to occur immediately prior to the applicable event and/or reinstate the original terms of an award if an event giving rise to the acceleration does not occur. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Administrator may override the provisions of Section 7.2, 7.3, and/or 7.5 by express provision in the award agreement or otherwise. The portion of any ISO accelerated pursuant to Section 7.2 or any other action permitted hereunder shall remain exercisable as an ISO only to the extent the applicable $100,000 limitation on ISOs is not exceeded. To the extent exceeded, the accelerated portion of the option shall be exercisable as a nonqualified stock option under the Code.

A-11

7.5 Possible Rescission of Acceleration. If the vesting of an award has been accelerated expressly in anticipation of an event and the Administrator later determines that the event will not occur, the Administrator may rescind the effect of the acceleration as to any then outstanding and unexercised or otherwise unvested awards; provided, that, in the case of any compensation that has been deferred for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, the Administrator determines that such rescission will not likely result in the imposition of additional tax or interest under Code Section 409A.

8.	OTHER PROVISIONS

8.1 Compliance with Laws. This Plan, the granting and vesting of awards under this Plan, the offer, issuance and delivery of shares of Common Stock, the acceptance of promissory notes and/or the payment of money under this Plan or under awards are subject to compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations (including but not limited to state and federal securities law, federal margin requirements) and to such approvals by any applicable stock exchange listing, regulatory or governmental authority as may, in the opinion of counsel for the Corporation, be necessary or advisable in connection therewith. The person acquiring any securities under this Plan will, if requested by the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries, provide such assurances and representations to the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries as the Administrator may deem necessary or desirable to assure compliance with all applicable legal and accounting requirements.

8.2 Future Awards/Other Rights. No person shall have any claim or rights to be granted an award (or additional awards, as the case may be) under this Plan, subject to any express contractual rights (set forth in a document other than this Plan) to the contrary.

8.3 No Employment/Service Contract. Nothing contained in this Plan (or in any other documents under this Plan or in any award) shall confer upon any Eligible Person or other participant any right to continue in the employ or other service of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries, constitute any contract or agreement of employment or other service or affect an employee’s status as an employee at will, nor shall interfere in any way with the right of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries to change a person’s compensation or other benefits, or to terminate his or her employment or other service, with or without cause. Nothing in this Section 8.3, however, is intended to adversely affect any express independent right of such person under a separate employment or service contract other than an award agreement.

8.4 Plan Not Funded. Awards payable under this Plan shall be payable in shares or from the general assets of the Corporation, and no special or separate reserve, fund or deposit shall be made to assure payment of such awards. No participant, beneficiary or other person shall have any right, title or interest in any fund or in any specific asset (including shares of Common Stock, except as expressly otherwise provided) of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries by reason of any award hereunder. Neither the provisions of this Plan (or of any related documents), nor the creation or adoption of this Plan, nor any action taken pursuant to the provisions of this Plan shall create, or be construed to create, a trust of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries and any participant, beneficiary or other person. To the extent that a participant, beneficiary or other person acquires a right to receive payment pursuant to any award hereunder, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Corporation.

8.5 Tax Withholding. Upon any exercise, vesting, or payment of any award, the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries shall have the right at its option to:

(a) require the participant (or the participant’s personal representative or beneficiary, as the case may be) to pay or provide for payment of at least the minimum amount of any taxes which the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries may be required to withhold with respect to such award event or payment; or

(b) deduct from any amount otherwise payable in cash to the participant (or the participant’s personal representative or beneficiary, as the case may be) the minimum amount of any taxes which the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries may be required to withhold with respect to such cash payment.

In any case where a tax is required to be withheld in connection with the delivery of shares of Common Stock under this Plan, the Administrator may in its sole discretion (subject to Section 8.1) grant (either at the time of the award or thereafter) to the participant the right to elect, pursuant to such rules and subject to such conditions as the Administrator may establish, to have the Corporation reduce the number of shares to be delivered by (or otherwise reacquire) the appropriate number of shares, valued in a consistent manner at their Fair Market Value or at the sales price in accordance with authorized procedures for cashless exercises, necessary to satisfy the minimum applicable withholding obligation on exercise, vesting or payment. In no event shall the shares withheld exceed the minimum whole number of shares required for tax withholding under applicable law.

A-12

8.6 Effective Date, Termination and Suspension, Amendments.

8.6.1 Effective Date and Termination. This Plan was approved by the Board and became effective on April 1, 2013. Unless earlier terminated by the Board, this Plan shall terminate at the close of business on April 1, 2023. After the termination of this Plan either upon such stated expiration date or its earlier termination by the Board, no additional awards may be granted under this Plan, but previously granted awards (and the authority of the Administrator with respect thereto, including the authority to amend such awards) shall remain outstanding in accordance with their applicable terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of this Plan.

8.6.2 Board Authorization. The Board may, at any time, terminate or, from time to time, amend, modify or suspend this Plan, in whole or in part. No awards may be granted during any period that the Board suspends this Plan.

8.6.3 Stockholder Approval. To the extent then required by applicable law or any applicable stock exchange or required under Sections 162, 422 or 424 of the Code to preserve the intended tax consequences of this Plan, or deemed necessary or advisable by the Board, this Plan and any amendment to this Plan shall be subject to stockholder approval.

8.6.4 Amendments to Awards. Without limiting any other express authority of the Administrator under (but subject to) the express limits of this Plan, the Administrator by agreement or resolution may waive conditions of or limitations on awards to participants that the Administrator in the prior exercise of its discretion has imposed, without the consent of a participant, and (subject to the requirements of Sections 3.2 and 8.6.5) may make other changes to the terms and conditions of awards. Any amendment or other action that would constitute a repricing of an award is subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3.2(g).

8.6.5 Limitations on Amendments to Plan and Awards. No amendment, suspension or termination of this Plan or change of or affecting any outstanding award shall, without written consent of the participant, affect in any manner materially adverse to the participant any rights or benefits of the participant or obligations of the Corporation under any award granted under this Plan prior to the effective date of such change. Changes, settlements and other actions contemplated by Section 7 shall not be deemed to constitute changes or amendments for purposes of this Section 8.6.

8.7 Privileges of Stock Ownership. Except as otherwise expressly authorized by the Administrator or this Plan, a participant shall not be entitled to any privilege of stock ownership as to any shares of Common Stock not actually delivered to and held of record by the participant. No adjustment will be made for dividends or other rights as a stockholder for which a record date is prior to such date of delivery.

8.8 Governing Law; Construction; Severability.

8.8.1 Choice of Law. This Plan, the awards, all documents evidencing awards and all other related documents shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware

8.8.2 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction holds any provision invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Plan shall continue in effect.

8.8.3 Plan Construction.

(a) Rule 16b-3. It is the intent of the Corporation that the awards and transactions permitted by awards be interpreted in a manner that, in the case of participants who are or may be subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, qualify, to the maximum extent compatible with the express terms of the award, for exemption from matching liability under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation shall have no liability to any participant for Section 16 consequences of awards or events under awards if an award or event does not so qualify.

A-13

(b) Section 162(m). Awards under Sections 5.1.4 through 5.1.7 to persons described in Section 5.2 that are either granted or become vested, exercisable or payable based on attainment of one or more performance goals related to the Business Criteria, as well as Qualifying Options and Qualifying SARs granted to persons described in Section 5.2, that are approved by a committee composed solely of two or more outside directors (as this requirement is applied under Section 162(m) of the Code) shall be deemed to be intended as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code unless such committee provides otherwise at the time of grant of the award. It is the further intent of the Corporation that (to the extent the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries or awards under this Plan may be or become subject to limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code) any such awards and any other Performance-Based Awards under Section 5.2 that are granted to or held by a person subject to Section 162(m) will qualify as performance-based compensation or otherwise be exempt from deductibility limitations under Section 162(m).

(c) Code Section 409A Compliance. The Board intends that, except as may be otherwise determined by the Administrator, any awards under the Plan are either exempt from or satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and related regulations and Treasury pronouncements (“Section 409A”) to avoid the imposition of any taxes, including additional income or penalty taxes, thereunder. If the Administrator determines that an award, award agreement, acceleration, adjustment to the terms of an award, payment, distribution, deferral election, transaction or any other action or arrangement contemplated by the provisions of the Plan would, if undertaken, cause a participant’s award to become subject to Section 409A, unless the Administrator expressly determines otherwise, such award, award agreement, payment, acceleration, adjustment, distribution, deferral election, transaction or other action or arrangement shall not be undertaken and the related provisions of the Plan and/or award agreement will be deemed modified or, if necessary, rescinded in order to comply with the requirements of Section 409A to the extent determined by the Administrator without the content or notice to the participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Company nor the Administrator shall have any obligation to take any action to prevent the assessment of any excise tax or penalty on any participant under Section 409A and neither the Company nor the Administrator will have any liability to any participant for such tax or penalty.

(d) No Guarantee of Favorable Tax Treatment. Although the Company intends that awards under the Plan will be exempt from, or will comply with, the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, the Company does not warrant that any award under the Plan will qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 409A of the Code or any other provision of federal, state, local or foreign law. The Company shall not be liable to any participant for any tax, interest or penalties the participant might owe as a result of the grant, holding, vesting, exercise or payment of any award under the Plan

8.9 Captions. Captions and headings are given to the sections and subsections of this Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings shall not be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction or interpretation of this Plan or any provision thereof.

8.10 Stock-Based Awards in Substitution for Stock Options or Awards Granted by Other Corporation. Awards may be granted to Eligible Persons in substitution for or in connection with an assumption of employee stock options, SARs, restricted stock or other stock-based awards granted by other entities to persons who are or who will become Eligible Persons in respect of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries, in connection with a distribution, arrangement, business combination, merger or other reorganization by or with the granting entity or an affiliated entity, or the acquisition by the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries, directly or indirectly, of all or a substantial part of the stock or assets of the employing entity. The awards so granted need not comply with other specific terms of this Plan, provided the awards reflect only adjustments giving effect to the assumption or substitution consistent with the conversion applicable to the Common Stock in the transaction and any change in the issuer of the security. Any shares that are delivered and any awards that are granted by, or become obligations of, the Corporation, as a result of the assumption by the Corporation of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by an acquired company (or previously granted by a predecessor employer (or direct or indirect parent thereof) in the case of persons that become employed by the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries in connection with a business or asset acquisition or similar transaction) shall not be counted against the Share Limit or other limits on the number of shares available for issuance under this Plan, except as may otherwise be provided by the Administrator at the time of such assumption or substitution or as may be required to comply with the requirements of any applicable stock exchange.

8.11 Non-Exclusivity of Plan. Nothing in this Plan shall limit or be deemed to limit the authority of the Board or the Administrator to grant awards or authorize any other compensation, with or without reference to the Common Stock, under any other plan or authority.

A-14

8.12 No Corporate Action Restriction. The existence of this Plan, the award agreements and the awards granted hereunder shall not limit, affect or restrict in any way the right or power of the Board or the stockholders of the Corporation to make or authorize: (a) any adjustment, recapitalization, reorganization or other change in the capital structure or business of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, (b) any merger, arrangement, business combination, amalgamation, consolidation or change in the ownership of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, (c) any issue of bonds, debentures, capital, preferred or prior preference stock ahead of or affecting the capital stock (or the rights thereof) of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, (d) any dissolution or liquidation of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, (e) any sale or transfer of all or any part of the assets or business of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, or (f) any other corporate act or proceeding by the Corporation or any Subsidiary. No participant, beneficiary or any other person shall have any claim under any award or award agreement against any member of the Board or the Administrator, or the Corporation or any employees, officers or agents of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, as a result of any such action.

8.13 Other Corporation Benefit and Compensation Programs. Payments and other benefits received by a participant under an award made pursuant to this Plan shall not be deemed a part of a participant’s compensation for purposes of the determination of benefits under any other employee welfare or benefit plans or arrangements, if any, provided by the Corporation or any Subsidiary, except where the Administrator expressly otherwise provides or authorizes in writing or except as otherwise specifically set forth in the terms and conditions of such other employee welfare or benefit plan or arrangement. Awards under this Plan may be made in addition to, in combination with, as alternatives to or in payment of grants, awards or commitments under any other plans or arrangements of the Corporation or its Subsidiaries.

8.14 Prohibition on Repricing. Subject to Section 4, the Administrator shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Corporation (i) reduce the exercise price, or cancel and reissue options so as to in effect reduce the exercise price or (ii) change the manner of determining the exercise price so that the exercise price is less than the fair market value per share of Common Stock.

As adopted by the Board of Directors of Spherix Incorporated on April 1, 2013.

A-15

Appendix B

WRITTEN CONSENT OF STOCKHOLDER OF

SPHERIX INCORPORATED

The undersigned stockholder of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Consent Solicitation and accompanying Consent Solicitation Statement, each dated [___], 2013. The undersigned hereby consents (by checking the FOR box) or declines to consent (by checking the AGAINST box or the ABSTAIN box) to the adoption of the following recitals and resolutions:

WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the stockholders to approve the issuance of an aggregate of 118,483 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and 1,488,152 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock”), which is convertible into shares of Common Stock on a one-for-ten basis, as consideration for the acquisition of North South Holdings, Inc. (“North South”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between the Company, Nuta Technology Corp., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary and North South (the “Merger Consideration”);

WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company approved the issuance of the Merger Consideration on April 1, 2013 and recommended that the stockholders vote “FOR” the below resolution, which it has deemed is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders in accordance with NASDAQ listing standards;

WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the stockholders to approve the Spherix Incorporated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) attached as Appendix A to the Consent Solicitation Statement that accompanies this Written Consent, and has referred the same to the stockholders of the Company for approval by written consent;

WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company adopted the 2013 Plan on April 1, 2013 and recommended that the stockholders vote “FOR” the below resolution, which it has deemed is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders;

WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company approved the future retention of Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP (“SRFF”) as the Company’s outside legal counsel and waived any conflict of interest relating to or arising from the association of the Company’s current interim Chef Executive Officer and SRFF;

WHEREAS, on April 1, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the future retention of SRFF and recommended that the stockholders vote “FOR” the below resolution, which it has deemed is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company hereby approve the issuance of the Merger Consideration and such Merger Consideration, when issued in accordance with the Merger Agreement, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable;

[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

and it is further

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company hereby approve the Spherix Incorporated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, in the form attached as Appendix A to the Consent Solicitation Statement;

[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

and it is further

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company hereby approve and ratify the retention of SRFF as the Company’s outside legal counsel and hereby waive any conflict of interest relating to or arising from the association of the Company’s current interim Chef Executive Officer and SRFF.

[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

B-1

This Written Consent action may be executed in counterparts. Failure of any particular stockholder(s) to execute and deliver counterparts is immaterial so long as the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of the Company do execute and deliver counterparts.

This Written Consent is solicited by the Company’s Board of Directors.

(Continued, and to be dated and signed, on the other side)

PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Consent Materials

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Written Consent on ________, 2013.

Print name(s) exactly as shown on Stock Certificate(s)

______________________________ ________________________________________

Signature (and Title, if any) Signature (if held jointly)

Sign exactly as name(s) appear(s) on stock certificate(s). If stock is held jointly, each holder must sign. If signing is by attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, give full title as such. A corporation or partnership must sign by an authorized officer or general partner, respectively.

Please sign, date and return this consent to the following address or submit the consent through the e-mail address listed below:

Spherix Incorporated

7927 Jones Branch Drive, Suite #3125

Tysons Corner, VA 22102

You may also submit your consent by facsimile to (703) 992-9348.

B-2

NORTH SOUTH HOLDINGS INC.
(A COMPANY IN THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE )
BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31,			December
	2013			31,
	(Unaudited)			2012
ASSETS
Current assets:

Cash	$	508,787		$	549,047

Total current assets		508,787			549,047

Patent portfolio, net		436,091			415,000

Total assets	$	944,878		$	964,047

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accrued expenses	$	3,000		$	-

Total current liabilities		3,000			-

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders' Equity:

Preferred stock, par value $ 0.0001 per share; 1,000 shares authorized; Series A Convertible Preferred Stock; 500 shares, issued and outstanding with an aggregate liquidation preference of $1,000,000		-			-

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 75,000 shares authorized, 500 shares issued and outstanding		-			-

Additional paid in capital		1,000,000			1,000,000

Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(58,122	)		(35,953	)

Total stockholders' equity		941,878			964,047

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	944,878		$	964,047

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

NORTH SOUTH HOLDINGS INC.
(A COMPANY IN THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE )
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 (Unaudited)			For the Period from November 9, 2012 through December 31, 2012			For the Period from November 9, 2012 through March 31, 2013 (Unaudited)

Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:

Amortization		12,969			-			12,969
Director's fees		9,000			5,100			14,100
General and administrative		200			30,853			31,053

Total operating expenses		22,169			35,953			58,122

Net loss	$	(22,169	)	$	(35,953	)	$	(58,122	)

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

NORTH SOUTH HOLDINGS INC.
(A COMPANY IN THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE )
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 (Unaudited)			For the Period from November 9, 2012 through December 31, 2012			For the Period from November 9, 2012 through March 31, 2013 (Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:

Net loss	$	(22,169	)	$	(35,953	)	$	(58,122	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Amortization		12,969			-			12,969
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued expenses		3,000			-			3,000

Net cash used in operating activities		(6,200	)		(35,953	)		(42,153	)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchase of patent portfolios		(34,060	)		(415,000	)		(449,060	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(34,060	)		(415,000	)		(449,060	)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Issuance of shares to founders in exchange for initial capital contributions		-			1,000,000			1,000,000

Net cash provided by financing activities		-			1,000,000			1,000,000

Net (decrease) increase in cash		(40,260	)		549,047			508,787

Cash, beginning of period		549,047			-			-

Cash, end of period	$	508,787		$	549,047		$	508,787

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Cash paid during the year for:

Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-

Income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

For the Years Ending December 31	Harris Patent Portfolio		Compufill Patent Portfolio		Total Amortization
2013	$	38,855	$	27,451	$	66,306
2014		48,824		41,176		90,000
2015		48,824		41,176		90,000
2016		48,824		41,176		90,000
2017		48,824		41,176		90,000
Thereafter		201,940		157,845		359,785
Total	$	436,091	$	350,000	$	786,091


U.S. federal statutory rate			(34)%
State income tax rate, net of federal benefit			(5)
Less: valuation allowance			39
Provision for income taxes			– %

	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies.

	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): Unit price of $8.4650 estimated pursuant to Rules 457(c) under the Securities Act solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee, based on the average of the high and low prices of the Registrant’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market on May 7, 2013


		Page

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		11

BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND MARCH 31, 2013 (Unaudited)		12

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 9, 2012 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2012, FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 (Unaudited), AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 9, 2012 (INCEPTION) THROUGH MARCH 31, 2013 (Unaudited)		13

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 9, 2012 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2012, FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 (Unaudited), AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 9, 2012 (INCEPTION) THROUGH MARCH 31, 2013 (Unaudited)		14

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 9, 2012 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2012, FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 (Unaudited), AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 9, 2012 (INCEPTION) THROUGH MARCH 31, 2013 (Unaudited)		15

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		16

NORTH SOUTH HOLDINGS INC.
(A COMPANY IN THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
	Series A Convertible Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional Paid In		Accumulated During theDevelopment			Deficit
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital		Stage			Total

Balance at November 9, 2012		-	$	-		-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-

Issuance of shares to founders in exchange for initial capital contributions (500 shares of common stock at $0.0001 per share and 500 shares of convertible preferred stock at $2,000 per share)		500		-		500		-		1,000,000		-			1,000,000

Net loss		-		-		-		-		-		(35,953	)		(35,953	)

Balance at December 31, 2012		500		-		500		-		1,000,000		(35,953	)		964,047

Net loss (unaudited)		-		-		-		-		-		(22,169	)		(22,169	)

Balance at March 31, 2013 (Unaudited)		500	$	-		500	$	-	$	1,000,000	$	(58,122	)	$	941,878

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these statements.

Current	December 31, 2012
Federal	$	–
State		–
		–
Deferred
Federal		(12,224	)
State		(1,798	)
		(14,022	)
Change in valuation allowance		14,022
Total income tax provision	$	–

Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforward	$	2,200
Deferred start-up and organizational expenses		11,822
Valuation allowance		(14,022)
Net deferred tax asset	$	–


	Historical						North South April 2013 (1)			Spherix June 2013 (2)			Pro Forma Adjustments (3), (4)			Pro Forma Consolidated
ASSETS	Spherix Incorporated			North South Holdings, Inc.			North South April 2013 (1)			Spherix June 2013 (2)			Pro Forma Adjustments (3), (4)			Pro Forma Consolidated
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,448,526		$	508,787		$	2,234,880		$	500,000		$	2,000,000		$	5,948,526
								(350,000	)		(500,000	)		(1,893,667	)
Trade accounts receivable		1,315			-			-			-						1,315
Other receivables		3,508			-			-			-						3,508
Prepaid expenses and other assets		82,206			-			-			-						82,206
Total current assets		3,535,555			508,787			1,884,880			-			106,333			6,035,555

Investment in Spherix by North South											500,000			(500,000	)		-
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		7,930			-			-			-						7,930
Patent portfolios, net		-			436,091			350,000			-			1,100,000			1,100,000
														(786,091	)
Deposit		29,504			-			-			-						29,504
Total assets	$	3,572,989		$	944,878		$	2,234,880		$	500,000		$	(79,758	)	$	7,172,989

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	358,376		$	3,000		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	358,376
														(3,000	)
Accrued salaries and benefits		85,277			-			-			-						85,277
Liabilities of segment held for sale		10,205			-			-			-						10,205
Total current liabilities		453,858			3,000			-			-			(3,000	)		453,858

Deferred rent		45,285			-			-			-						45,285
Warrant liabilities		215,853			-			-			-						215,853
Total liabilities		714,996			3,000			-			-			(3,000	)		714,996

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity
Convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 500 shares authorized; Series A: 500 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013;					-
Convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; Series B: 1 share issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013; liquidation preference $1,000 per share		-			-			-			-						-
Series C: 229,337 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013; liquidation preference $0.0001 per share		23			-			-			-						23
Series D: no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013; liquidation preference $0.0001 per share		-			-			-			-			149			149
Series E: no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013; liquidation preference $0.0001 per share											10			(10	)		-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 814,114 issued at at March 31, 2013 and 813,713 outstanding at March 31, 2013		82			-			-			-			12			94
Paid-in capital in excess of par value		42,330,462			1,000,000			2,234,880			499,990			3,099,839			45,930,301
														(499,990	)
														(2,734,880	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 401 shares at March 31, 2013		(464,786	)		-			-			-						(464,786	)
Accumulated deficit		(39,007,788	)		(58,122	)		-			-			58,122			(39,007,788	)
Total stockholders' equity		2,857,993			941,878			2,234,880			500,000			(76,758	)		6,457,993
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	3,572,989		$	944,878		$	2,234,880		$	500,000		$	(79,758	)	$	7,172,989

Payment for North South’s Intangible Assets	$	1,100,000
Payment for North South’s Cash Balance		2,000,000
Estimated Purchase Price	$	3,100,000

Fair value of Common Stock	$	26,102
Fair value of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock		3,073,520
Rounding		378
Fair value of consideration for North South	$	3,100,000

	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

	(3)	Filing Party:

	DR		CR
Patent portfolios		350,000
Cash and cash equivalents				350,000

	DR		CR
Cash and cash equivalents		500,000
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock			10
Additional paid in capital				499,990

	DR		CR
Cash and cash equivalents		2,000,000
Intangible assets, net		1,100,000
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock				149
Common Stock				12
Additional paid in capital				3,099,839

	DR		CR
Additional paid in capital		2,734,880
Accounts payable		3,000
Cash and cash equivalents				1,893,667
Intangible assets, net				786,091
Accumulated deficit				58,122

	DR		CR
Amortization expense		129,412
Accumulated amortization				129,412

	DR		CR
Amortization expense		19,384
Accumulated amortization				19,384

Name and Position	Number of Options
Douglas Brown		75,000
Edward Karr		75,000
Harvey Kesner		1,000,000
Robert Vander Zander		75,000
Robert Clayton (resigned on June 28, 2013)		5,000
Executive Group		1,230,000

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a )			Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)			Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)			Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		7,163	1	$	22.34		2,750	3		7,163	1	$	22.34		2,750	3
Equity compensation plans not approved by securities holders		1,399	2	$	97.27		N/A			1,399	2	$	97.27		N/A
Total		8,562					2,750			8,562					2,750

	●	each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5.0% of any class of our voting securities;
	●	each of our directors;
	●	each of our named executive officers; and
	●	all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

	Beneficially Owned Amount (1)			% of Class

Principal Stockholders

Four Kids Investment Funds, LLC (5)		46,957	(5)	5.21	%
Hudson Bay IP Opportunities Master Fund L.P. (4)		51,653	(4)	5.73	%
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd. (6)		46,957	(6)	5.21	%
US Commonwealth Life A.I. (7)		110,000		12.21	%

All Principal Stockholders as a Group		255,567		28.36	%

Executive Officers and Directors

Douglas T. Brown		1,353	(2)	*
Edward M. Karr		1,013	(2)	*
Harvey J. Kesner		29,795	(2)(3)	3.27	%
Robert J. Vander Zanden		1,308	(2)	*

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (4 persons)		33,469	(2)	3.66	%

												Change in
												Pension
												Value
										Non-Equity		and Non-
										Incentive		Qualified		All Other
Name and						Stock		Option		Plan		Deferred		Compen-
Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Award ($)		Award ($) (1)		Compensation ($) (2)		Compensation Earnings ($)		sation ($) (3)		Total ($)
C. Kruger (3)	2012		262,573		-		-		3,919		143,222		-		286,443		696,157
Former CEO and COO	2011		278,100		-		-		531		139,050		-		-		417,681

R. Lodder	2012		233,398		-		-		2,138		93,359		-		-		328,895
Principal Executive Officer and President	2011		226,600		-		-		273		90,640		-		-		317,513

R. Clayton	2012		212,180		-		-		2,138		74,263		-		-		288,581
CFO, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary	2011		206,000		-		-		273		72,100		-		-		278,373

(1)	On November 15, 2011, C. Kruger, R. Lodder and R. Clayton were granted stock options for 500, 250, and 250 shares, respectively. On February 17, 2006, R. Clayton was granted stock options for 100 shares. Information regarding forfeiture and assumptions made in the valuation are disclosed in Note 10 of the consolidated financial statements included herein.
(2)	Awards pursuant to the Spherix Incorporated Incentive Compensation Plan.

Completed Service Years	Severance Pay
> 1 year	10 days
1 but less than 2 years	15 days
2 but less than 3 years	20 days
3 but less than 4 years	25 days
4 or more years	30 days

Name	Fees Earned Paid in Cash ($)		Options ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Douglas T. Brown	$	22,000	$	8,084	$	-	$	30,084
Edward M. Karr		3,600		6,980		-		10,580
Harvey J. Kesner (2)		3,600		6,980		-		10,580
Aris Melissaratos (1)		22,000		8,084		10,500		40,584
Thomas B. Peter(1)		17,300		8,084		3,500		28,884
Robert J. Vander Zanden		32,900		8,084		-		40,984

(1)	Aris Melissaratos and Thomas B. Peter resigned their positions as Directors of the Company on November 30, 2012.
(2)	On February 29, 2013, Mr. Kesner was elected as interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Annual Retainer	$	5,000	To be paid in cash at May Board Meeting annually.
Stock Options	$	10,000	To be calculated by dividing $10,000 by the closing stock price the day the Stock Options are awarded; and at the May Board Meeting annually thereafter. The Options will vest in full on the day of award and will be exercisable for a period of five (5) years.
Board Meeting Fees	$	2,500	To be paid for all in-person Board Meetings. Members must be present to be paid.
Committee Meeting Fees	$	800	To be paid for all in-person Committee Meetings. Members must be present to be paid.
Teleconference Fees	$	300	To be paid for all teleconferences called by either the Chairman of the Board, the President, or by the Chairman of the relevant Committee. Members must be on-line to be paid.
Additional Retainer	$	5,000	To be paid to the Chairman of the Board upon election annually.
Additional Retainer	$	1,000	To be paid to the Chairman of the Audit Committee at May Board Meeting annually.