QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19,May 24, 2004

Registration No. 333-            333-113760



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


AMENDMENT NO. 3
to
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


DIGIRAD CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware 3845 33-0145723
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

13950 Stowe Drive
Poway, California 92064
(858) 726-1600
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)

David M. Sheehan
Chief Executive Officer
Digirad Corporation
13950 Stowe Drive
Poway, California 92064
(858) 726-1600
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)



Copies to:
John A. de Groot, Esq.
Taylor L. Stevens, Esq.
Kristopher L. Hanson, Esq.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
3811 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 500
San Diego, California 92130
(858) 720-5100
 Vera P. Pardee, Esq.
Vice-PresidentVice President and General Counsel
Digirad Corporation
13950 Stowe Drive
Poway, California 92064
(858) 726-1600
 Charles K. Ruck, Esq.
Scott N. Wolfe, Esq.
B. Shayne Kennedy, Esq.
Latham & Watkins LLP
12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, California 92130
(858) 523-5400

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.


        If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.    o

        If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

        If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

        If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

        If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box.    o


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title of Each Class of
Securities to be Registered

 Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price(1)

 Amount of
Registration Fee


Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share $86,250,000 $10,928


Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered
 Amount to be Registered(1)
 Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share
 Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(2)
 Amount of Registration Fee

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share 6,325,000 $14.00 $88,550,000 $11,220(3)

(1)
Includes 825,000 shares subject to the underwriters' overallotment option.

(2)
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933.

(3)
Of this amount, $10,928 has been previously paid.



        The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.




The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to Completion
Preliminary Prospectus dated ,May 24, 2004

PROSPECTUS

5,500,000 Shares

DIGIRAD LOGODIGIRAD LOGO

Common Stock


        This is our initial public offering of shares of our common stock. We are offering 5,500,000 shares. We expect the initial public offering price to be between $$12.00 and $$14.00 per share.

        Currently, no public market exists for the shares. After pricing of the offering, we expect that the shares will be quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "DRAD."

        Investing in the common stock involves risks that are described in the "Risk Factors" section beginning on page 7 of this prospectus.


 
 Per shareShare
 Total
Public offering price $ $
Underwriting discounts and commissions $ $
Proceeds, before expenses, to us $ $

        The underwriters may also purchase up to an additional 825,000 shares of common stock from us at the public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus to cover over-allotments.

        Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

        The shares will be ready for delivery on or about                        , 2004.


Joint Book-Running Managers

Merrill Lynch & Co. JPMorgan

Banc of America Securities LLC William Blair & Company

The date of this prospectus is                        , 2004.


GRAPHIC



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Prospectus Summary 1
Risk Factors 7
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 28
Use of Proceeds 29
Dividend Policy 2930
Capitalization 3031
Dilution 3233
Selected Consolidated Financial Data 3435
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 3637
Business 4650
Management 6771
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 8285
Principal Stockholders 8790
Description of Capital Stock 9194
Shares Eligible for Future Sale 97100
Underwriting 99102
Legal mattersMatters 102105
Experts 102105
Where You Can Find More Information 102105
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements F-1

        You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

i




PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

        This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before buying shares of our common stock. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, especially the "Risk Factors" section and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus, before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. References in this prospectus to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws refer to the certificate of incorporation and bylaws that will be in effect upon completion of this offering.


Digirad Corporation

        We are a leader in the development, manufacture and distribution of solid-state medical imaging products and services for the detection of cardiovascular disease and other medical conditions. We designed and commercialized the first solid-state gamma camera. Our initial focus is on nuclear cardiology imaging procedures performed with gamma cameras, which we believe generate revenue of approximately $10.0 billion annually in the United States. Our target markets are primarily physician practices and outpatient clinics, which we believe constitute approximately 25% of the total market, or $2.5 billion.

        Our gamma cameras use small semiconductors to replace the bulky vacuum tubes used historically in gamma cameras. By utilizing solid-state technology, we believe that our imaging systems maintain image quality while offering significant advantages over vacuum tube-based systems, including mobility through reduced size and weight, enhanced operability and reliability and improved patient comfort and utilization. Our imaging systems, consisting of a gamma camera and accessories, easily fit into spaces as small as seven feet by eight feet. Due to the size and other limitations of vacuum tube cameras, nuclear imaging has traditionally been confined to dedicated and customized space within a hospital or imaging center. The mobility of our imaging systems enables us to deliver nuclear imaging procedures in a wide range of clinical settings—physician offices, outpatient clinics or within multiple departments in a hospital.

        We sell our imaging systems to physicians, outpatient clinics and hospitals. In addition, through our wholly-owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, Digirad Imaging Solutions, Inc. and Digirad Imaging Systems, Inc., orwhich we refer to collectively as DIS, we also offer a comprehensive and mobile imaging leasing service, called FlexImaging®, for physicians who wish to perform nuclear cardiology imaging procedures in their offices but do not have the patient volume, capital or resources to justify purchasing a gamma camera. DIS provides our physician customers with an imaging system, certified personnel, required licensure and other support for the performance of nuclear imaging procedures under the supervision of our physician customers. Physicians enter into annual contracts for imaging services delivered on a per-day basis ranging from one day per month to several days per week. DIS currently operates 2321 regional hubs and seveneight fixed sites and performs services in 17 states.states and the District of Columbia.

        Our unique dual sales and leasing distribution model offers physicians, clinics and hospitals versatile delivery options that appeal to medical establishments of all sizes, capabilities and imaging expertise. The mobility of our imaging systems and the flexibility of our DIS service allow cardiologists to provide nuclear imaging procedures in their offices to patients that they historically had to refer to hospitals or imaging centers. As a result, we provide physicians with more control over the diagnosis and treatment of their patients and enable physicians to capture revenue from procedures that would otherwise be referred to these hospitals and imaging centers.

        Nuclear imaging is a clinical diagnostic tool, with established reimbursement codes, that has been in use for over 40 years. According to industry sources, approximately 18.4 million nuclear imaging procedures were performed in the United States in 2002, of which approximately 9.9 million were cardiac procedures, a volume that is expected to grow by approximately 25% annually over the next three years. We believe the growth in nuclear cardiology imaging will be driven by an increase in coronary heart disease resulting from the aging of baby boomers and the record rate of obesity and diabetes in all age groups. We estimate that the growth rate in 2002 for nuclear imaging procedures performed in physician offices was approximately 44% and in hospitals was approximately 6%. We expect the mobility of our imaging systems

1




to continue to allow us to capitalize on this shift in the delivery of nuclear cardiology imaging services from hospitals to physician offices.

        The target market for our products is the approximately 30,000 cardiologists in the United States that perform or could perform nuclear cardiology procedures. To date, we have sold or provided imaging services through DIS to approximately 500 physicians. In 2003, DIS performed over 66,000 patient procedures.

        We sold our first gamma camera in March 2000, and we established DIS in September 2000. We had consolidated revenues and net losses of $41.5 million and $12.8 million, respectively, in fiscal 2002, and $56.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in fiscal 2003.2003 and $15.9 million and $266,000, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Revenues from DIS and from our camera sales constituted 62% and 38%, respectively, of our 2003 consolidated revenues.revenues and 66% and 34%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004. We believe DIS will continue to provide us with recurring annual contractual revenue and comprise the largest component of our consolidated revenues.

Our Competitive Strengths

        We believe that our position as a market leader in the nuclear cardiac imaging market is a product of the following competitive strengths:

Our Business Strategy

        We intend to continue to expand our business, improve our market position and increase our revenue and profits by pursuing the following business strategies:


2


Corporate Information

        Our business was originally incorporated in California in November 1985 and we reincorporated in Delaware in January 1997. Our principal executive offices are located at 13950 Stowe Drive, Poway, California 92064 and our telephone number is (858) 726-1600. We maintain a website on the Internet atwww.digirad.com. The information contained in, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of this prospectus. Unless the context requires otherwise, as used in this prospectus the terms "Digirad," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Digirad Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries.

        We have trademark registrations in the United States for 2020tc Imager®, CardiusSST®, Digirad®, Digirad Logo®, Digirad Imaging Solutions®, FlexImaging® and SPECTour®. We have trademark applications pending in the United States for the following marks: Cardius™, DigiServSM, DigiSpectSM, DigiTechSM and SolidiumSM. We have obtained and sought trademark protection for some of the above listed marks in the European Community and Japan.

3




THE OFFERING

Common stock we are offering 5,500,000 shares

Common stock to be outstanding after this offering

 

17,998,646 shares

Use of proceeds

 

We expect to use a majority of the net proceeds of this offering to manufacture and market our gamma cameras, build our sales and marketing capabilities, expand our DIS business and repay outstanding lines of credit and notes payable of approximately $9.4$9.7 million. To a lesser extent, we anticipate using the remaining net proceeds of this offering for further research and development relating to our existing products and new product opportunities, to finance regulatory approval activities and for general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to acquire products, technologies or businesses that are complementary to our own.

Proposed Nasdaq National Market symbol

 

DRAD

        The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on the shares of common stock outstanding as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. This number excludes as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003:2004:


In addition, except where we state otherwise, the information we present in this prospectus reflects:

4




SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

        The following table summarizes our consolidated financial information for the periods presented which are derived from our audited financial statements.presented. You should read this information together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" section of this prospectus. The summary financial data at March 31, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2004 are derived from our unaudited financial statements which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 
 Years ended December 31,
 
Statement of Operations Data:

 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (In thousands, except per share
amounts and operating data)

 
Revenues:          
 DIS $10,239 $23,005 $34,849 
 Product  18,065  18,527  21,388 
  
 
 
 
Total revenues  28,304  41,532  56,237 

Cost of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 DIS  8,344  16,599  24,463 
 Product  13,192  13,633  15,092 
  
 
 
 
Total cost of revenues  21,536  30,232  39,555 
  
 
 
 

Gross profit

 

 

6,768

 

 

11,300

 

 

16,682

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Research and development  3,009  2,967  2,191 
 Sales and marketing  9,974  8,066  6,008 
 General and administrative  8,161  9,497  8,097 
 Amortization and impairment of intangible assets  991  1,011  444 
 Stock-based compensation(1)  1,579  606  226 
  
 
 
 
Total operating expenses  23,714  22,147  16,966 
  
 
 
 
Loss from operations  (16,946) (10,847) (284)
Other income (expense), net  (2,965) (1,925) (1,396)
  
 
 
 
Net loss $(19,911)$(12,772)$(1,680)
  
 
 
 
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(20,041)$(13,037)$(2,006)
  
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share(2):          
 Historical $(898.86)$(409.23)$(36.46)
  
 
 
 
 Pro forma       $(0.04)
        
 

Shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share(2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Historical  22  32  55 
  
 
 
 
 Pro forma        43,610 
        
 
 
 As of December 31, 2003
 
 Actual
 As adjusted(3)
 
 (In thousands)

Balance sheet data:     
Cash and cash equivalents $7,681  
Working capital  2,578  
Total assets  35,159  
Total debt  16,441  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock  84,278  
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)  (75,703) 
 
 Years Ended December 31,
 Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
Statement of Operations Data:

 2001
 2002
 2003
 2003
 2004
 
 
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)

 
Revenues:                
 DIS $10,239 $23,005 $34,848 $7,503 $10,407 
 Product  18,065  18,527  21,388  5,476  5,461 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues  28,304  41,532  56,236  12,979  15,868 

Cost of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 DIS  8,344  16,599  24,463  5,642  7,265 
 Product  13,192  13,633  15,091  3,841  3,639 
 Stock-based compensation(1)  298  124  114  1  116 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total cost of revenues  21,834  30,356  39,668  9,484  11,020 
  
 
 
 
 
 

Gross profit

 

 

6,470

 

 

11,176

 

 

16,568

 

 

3,495

 

 

4,848

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Research and development  3,009  2,967  2,191  579  640 
 Sales and marketing  9,974  8,065  6,008  1,547  1,780 
 General and administrative  8,161  9,497  8,097  1,851  2,145 
 Amortization and impairment of intangible assets  991  1,011  444  119  16 
 Stock-based compensation(1)  1,281  483  112  1  188 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating expenses  23,416  22,023  16,852  4,097  4,769 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations  (16,946) (10,847) (284) (602) 79 
Other income (expense), net  (2,965) (1,925) (1,396) (325) (345)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss $(19,911)$(12,772)$(1,680)$(927)$(266)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(20,041)$(13,037)$(2,006)$(1,012)$(354)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share(2):                
 Historical $(3,146.16)$(1,432.31)$(127.62)$(74.63)$(10.88)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Pro forma (unaudited)       $(0.13)   $(0.02)
        
    
 

Shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share(2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Historical  6  9  16  14  33 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Pro forma (unaudited)        12,460     12,477 
        
    
 

 
 As of March 31, 2004
 
 Actual
 As Adjusted(3)
 
 (In thousands)
(unaudited)

Balance sheet data:      
Cash and cash equivalents $8,902 $64,030
Working capital  829  65,956
Total assets  38,012  93,140
Total debt  15,841  6,169
Redeemable convertible preferred stock  84,367  
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)  (75,709) 73,458

(1)
Please see our consolidated statement of operations on page F-4 and Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on stock-based compensation.

5


(2)
Please see Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for an explanation of the method used to calculate the historical and pro forma net loss per share and the number of shares used in the computation of per share amounts.

(3)
The as adjusted column in the balance sheet data reflects the automatic conversion of all of our preferred stock outstanding as of DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 into 43,555,36712,444,294 shares of our common stock in connection with this offering, the sale of 5,500,000 shares of our common stock at an assumed initial public offering price of $$13.00 per share, the mid-point of the range on the cover of this prospectus, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commission and the estimated expenses payable by us in connection with this offering, and the repayment of $9.4$9.7 million due under our short-term lines of credit.credit and notes payable.

6




RISK FACTORS

        An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, before making an investment decision. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects would likely be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

        If our imaging systems and DIS services are not accepted by physicians or hospitals, we may be unable to develop a sustainable, profitable business.

        We expect that substantially all of our revenue in the foreseeable future will be derived from sales of our products in the nuclear imaging market and our leasing services offered through our wholly owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, Digirad Imaging Solutions, Inc. and Digirad Imaging Systems, Inc., orwhich we refer to collectively as DIS. Our solid-state gamma cameras and DIS services represent a new approach in the nuclear imaging market, and we have sold our products only in limited quantities and leased our services for only a limited time.market. We began full commercial release of our imaging systems in March 2000 and established DIS in September 2000. Because of the recent commercial introduction of our nuclear imaging systems, we have limited product and brand recognition and our imaging systems have been used by a limited number of physicians and hospitals. Physicians and hospitals may generally be slow to adopt our products and leasing services for a number of reasons, including:

        Our success in the nuclear imaging market depends on whether physicians and hospitals view our imaging systems and DIS services as effective and economically beneficial. We believe that physicians and hospitals will not adopt our imaging systems or lease our DIS services unless they determine, based on experience and other factors, that our imaging systems and DIS services are an attractive alternative to vacuum tube imaging systems. We also believe that recommendations and support of our products and services by influential physicians and other health care providers are essential for market acceptance and adoption. We cannot assure you that physicians or hospitals will adopt or accept our imaging systems or DIS services. If physicians and hospitals do not adopt our imaging systems or DIS services, our operating results and business will be harmed.

        We sell our imaging systems and provide our services in a highly competitive industry, and we often compete against large, well-established competitors that have significantly greater financial resources than we have.

        The medical device industry, including the market for imaging systems and services, is highly competitive, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new product introductions and market activities of other industry participants. Our primary competitors with respect to imaging systems include several large medical device manufacturers, including Philips Medical Systems, General Electric Healthcare, Siemens Medical Systems and Toshiba Medical Systems. All of these competitors offer a full line of imaging cameras for each diagnostic imaging technology, including x-ray, magnetic resonance

7




imaging, computerized tomography, ultrasound and nuclear medicine. The existing imaging systems sold by our competitors have been in use for a longer time than our products and are more widely recognized and used by physicians and hospitals for nuclear imaging. Many of our competitors and potential competitors enjoy significant competitive advantages over us, including:

        The competitive nature of the nuclear imaging industry has had an impact on the price of our dual-head gamma cameras. For example, for the three months ended March 31, 2004 we experienced a moderate decline in the selling price for our dual-head gamma cameras when compared to the three months period ended March 31, 2003. While we anticipate demand for our dual-head gamma cameras to continue to increase, we believe these pricing pressures will continue to impact our gamma camera product revenue and gross profit.

        In providing comprehensive mobile nuclear imaging solutions, we generally compete against small businesses employing traditional vacuum tube cameras that must be transported in large vehicles and cannot be moved in and out of physician offices.

        We are aware of certain major medical device companies that are attempting to develop solid-state cameras and we believe these efforts will continue. In addition, we are aware of a privately-held company, Gamma Medica, which is currently marketing a solid-state gamma camera for breast imaging. We do not believe that this camera can be used in a cardiac application. However, we cannot assure you that Gamma Medica will not attempt to modify its existing camera for use in the cardiac segment in the future, or develop another gamma camera for cardiac applications. Because of the size of the potential market, we anticipate that companies will dedicate significant resources to developing competing products and services. Current or future competitors may develop technologies and products that demonstrate better image quality, ease of use or mobility than our imaging systems. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to develop proprietary products that reach the market in a timely manner, receive adequate reimbursement and are less expensive than alternatives available for the same purpose. If we are unable to compete effectively against our existing and future competitors our sales will decline and our business will be harmed.

        Changes in domestic and international legislation, regulation, or coverage and reimbursement policies of third-party payors may adversely impact our ability to market and sell our products and services.

        Physicians and hospitals purchasing and using our products rely on adequate third-party payor coverage and reimbursement to maintain their operations. Changes in domestic and international legislation, regulation or coverage and reimbursement policies of third-party payors may adversely affect the demand for our existing and future products and services and may limit our ability to market and sell our products and services on a profitable basis. For example, on December 8, 2003, President Bush signed into law the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, (the "Medicareor the Medicare Modernization Act"),Act, which contains a wide variety of changes that impact Medicare reimbursement to physicians and hospitals. We cannot predict what additional changes will be made to such legislation, regulation, or coverage and reimbursement policies, but we believe that future coverage and reimbursement may be subject to increased restrictions both in the United States and in international markets. Additionally, we cannot be certain that under prospective payment systems, or established fee schedule payment formulas, under which healthcare providers may be reimbursed a fixed amount based on the patient's condition or the type of procedure performed, the costs of our products and services will be



justified and incorporated into the overall payment for the procedure. Third-party payors continue to act to contain or reduce healthcare costs through various means, including the movement to managed care systems where healthcare providers contract to provide comprehensive healthcare for a fixed fee per patient. These continued efforts to reduce healthcare costs may result in third-party payors refusing to reimburse patients or healthcare providers for our imaging services or allowing only specific providers to provide imaging services. As a result, sales of our gamma cameras would suffer and we may receive

8



pressure from our customers to terminate or otherwise modify the lease arrangements for our DIS services. Under such circumstances, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

        Because our imaging systems and DIS services are not widely diversified, a decrease in sales of our products and leasing services could seriously harm our business.

        Our current product and leasing service offerings consist primarily of our line of gamma cameras, including our Cardius-1, Cardius-2, 2020tc Imager and SPECTpak PLUS camera systems, each of which is used in the nuclear imaging market segment and all of which utilize the same solid-state technology. In addition, we offer a mobile imaging leasing service through DIS, which includes an imaging system, certified personnel, required licensure and other support for nuclear imaging procedures. As such, our line of products and services is not as diversified as those of some of our competitors. Consequently, if sales of our products or leasing services decline precipitously, our business would be seriously harmed, and it would likely be difficult for us to recover because we do not have the breadth of products or services that would enable us to sustain our business while seeking to develop new types of products or services or other markets for our existing products and services. In addition, because our technical know-how and intellectual property have limited applications, we may be unable to leverage our technical know-how and intellectual property to diversify our products and services or to develop other products or sources of revenue outside of the nuclear imaging market.

        Our imaging systems and DIS services may become obsolete, and we may not be able to timely develop new products, product enhancements or services that will be accepted by the market.

        Our nuclear imaging system and DIS services may become obsolete or unmarketable if other products or services utilizing new technologies are introduced by our competitors or new industry standards emerge. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully develop or market new products and services, or enhancements to our existing products, or that our future products and enhancements will be accepted by our current or potential customers or the third-party payors who financially support many of the procedures performed with our products. Any of these circumstances may cause us to lose customers, disrupt our business operations and harm our product sales and services. To be successful, we will need to enhance our products or services and to design, develop and market new products that successfully respond to competitive developments, all of which may be expensive and time consuming.

        The success of any new product offering or enhancement to an existing product will depend on several factors, including our ability to:


        If we do not develop and obtain regulatory approvals or clearances for new products, services or product enhancements in time to meet market demand, or if there is insufficient demand for these products, services or enhancements, our business, financial condition and results of operations will likely suffer. In addition, even if our customers acquire new products, services or product enhancements we may

9



offer, the revenues from any such products, services or enhancements may not be sufficient to offset the significant costs associated with offering such products, services or enhancements to customers. In addition, any announcements of new products, services or enhancements may cause customers to decline or cancel their purchasing decisions in anticipation of such products, services or enhancements.

        If we experience problems with the technologies used in our imaging systems or if delivery of our DIS services are delayed, public perception of us could be harmed and cause us to lose customers and revenue.

        Our gamma cameras have only recently been introduced into the marketplace. Most of our cameras currently in use are less than three years old. We have experienced some reliability issues with a prior version of our detector heads. In July 2003, we began selling most of our gamma cameras with a new version of our detector heads that we believe offers increased reliability. In addition, as the period of use of our cameras increases, other significant defects may occur. If significant defects do arise with our gamma cameras, our reputation among physicians and hospitals could be damaged.

        Additionally, physicians rely on our DIS services to provide nuclear imaging procedures to their patients on the dates and at the times they have requested. Many factors could prevent us from delivering our DIS services on a timely basis, including weather and the availability of staffing, transportation and necessary supplies. If we are unable to provide physicians or hospitals our DIS services in a timely and effective manner, our reputation among physicians and hospitals could be damaged.

        The performance and reliability of our products and services are critical to our reputation and to our ability to achieve market acceptance of those products and services. Widespread or other failures of our cameras and other products to consistently meet the expectations of purchasers or customers that use our DIS services could adversely affect our reputation, our ability to provide our DIS services, our relations with current customers and our business operations. Such failures could also reduce the attractiveness of our products and services to potential customers. Equipment failures could result from any number of causes, including equipment aging, ordinary wear and tear due to regular transportation and relocation, failure to perform routine maintenance and latent hardware or software defects of which we are unaware. Such failures, whether actual or perceived, could adversely affect our business even if we correct the underlying problems.

        Our manufacturing operations are highly dependent upon third-party suppliers, making us vulnerable to supply problems and price fluctuations, which could harm our business.

        We rely on a limited number of third parties to manufacture and supply certain of the key components of our products. While many of the components used in our products are available from multiple sources, we obtain some components from single sources. For example, key components of the detector heads and the acquisition and control software utilized in our gamma cameras are manufactured or supplied by a single source. To be successful, our contract manufacturers and suppliers must provide us with the components of our systems in requisite quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements, in accordance with agreed-upon specifications, at acceptable cost and on a timely basis. Segami Corporation, or Segami, has developed image acquisition and processing software for our camera under a non-exclusive license agreement. In the event that Segami attempts to terminate the license agreement, refuses to extend the term of the license or seeks to impose unreasonable pricing or terms, we would have to find an alternative software system to use in our gamma camera. Our reliance on these outside suppliers subjects us to a number of risks that could harm our business, including:



10



        Any interruption or delay in the supply of components or materials, or our inability to obtain components or materials from alternate sources at acceptable prices in a timely manner, could impair our ability to meet the demand of our customers and cause them to cancel orders or switch to competitive procedures. These events could harm our business and operating results.

        We have limited marketing, sales and distribution capabilities, and our efforts in those areas are dependent in part on third parties.

        We began commercial production and shipped our first imaging products in 2000, and therefore have limited experience in marketing, selling and distributing our products and services. Additionally, while we have a direct sales team focused on domestic marketing, sales and distribution, we also use four independent distributors in the United States and two independent, international sales distributors to market, sell and distribute our products and services. As a result, we are dependent in part upon the marketing, sales and distribution efforts of our third-party distributors. To date, one of our domestic third-party distributors is permitted to market, sell and distribute competing imaging services and products. Additionally, one of our domestic third-party distributors, as well as one of our international distributors, is generally permitted to market, sell and distribute competing imaging products that are used or refurbished and meet specified age requirements. Our other international distributor is prohibited from promoting or distributing any other gamma camera product, but is not prohibited from offering competing services.

        Our future revenue growth will depend in large part on our success in maintaining and expanding our marketing, sales and distribution channels, which will likely be an expensive and time-consuming process. We are highly dependent upon the efforts of our sales force and third-party distributors to increase our revenue. We face intense competition for qualified sales employees and may be unable to hire, train, manage and retain such personnel, which could adversely affect our ability to maintain and expand our marketing, sales and distribution network, which would negatively affect our ability to compete effectively as a distributor of nuclear imaging devices. Additionally, even if we are able to expand our sales force and enter into agreements with additional third-party distributors on commercially reasonable terms, they may not commit the necessary resources to effectively market, sell and distribute our products and services domestically and internationally. If we are unable to maintain and expand our direct and third-party marketing, sales and distribution networks, we may be unable to sell enough of our products and imaging services for our business to be profitable and our financial condition and results of operations will likely suffer accordingly.



        If we failare unable to meet the demand forsuccessfully operate and manage our imaging systems and DIS services as we transition manufacturing operations to a singleat our new facility, we may experience a decrease in sales.

        We are currently inrecently completed the processtransition of transitioning our manufacturing operations from several separate facilities to a single facility. We must complete construction of and equipAs we scale-up operations at our new facility, and obtain U.S.

11



Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and California Food and Drug Branch approval prior to manufacturing our imaging systems at such facility. The completion of this process could be delayed bywe may encounter unforeseen circumstances, including:

        As we scale-up operations at our new facility,In addition, we may also experience difficulties in producing sufficient quantities or quality of products or in achieving sufficient quality and manufacturing yield levels. If we are unable to commencesuccessfully operate and manage our manufacturing operations at our new facility on schedule or otherwise fail to meet our manufacturing needs, we may not be able to provide our customers with the quantity or quality of products they require, and we could lose customers and suffer reduced revenues.

        We are subject to the financial risks associated with providing services through our DIS business.

        There are numerous risks associated with any leasing arrangement, including the possibility that physicians may fail to make the required payments under the terms and provisions of their lease commitments. Our DIS business is also affected by the ability of physicians to pay us, which in turn may be affected by general economic and business conditions and the availability of reimbursement for the physicians. Such circumstances could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

        If we are unable to expand our DIS business, our business could be materially harmed.

        We plan to grow our DIS business by expanding into several new states, adding new hub locations in states in which we currently operate and increasing hub utilization by adding physician customers and routes. As we undertake this expansion, we will need to hire, train and retain qualified personnel. We cannot assure you that physicians or hospitals in these new markets will accept our imaging products or services. Our expansion into additional domestic markets is subject to inherent risk, including the burden of complying with applicable state regulations, including but not limited to regulations concerning the use, storage, handling and disposal of radioactive materials, the difficulties in obtaining the necessary radioactive licensures and difficulties in staffing and managing operations. Further, certain states have regulations that willFurthermore, physician self-referral laws currently in effect in the State of New York do not allow the conduct of our DIS business as it is currently structured or at all.all, and we may find the laws of other states in which we do not currently operate to require us to change the structure of our DIS business to operate in such states.

        A loss of key executives or failure to attract qualified managers, engineers and imaging technologists could limit our growth and adversely affect our business.

        Our success is dependent on the efforts of our key technical, sales and managerial personnel and our ability to retain them, particularly David M. Sheehan, Paul J. Early, Herb Bellucci, Todd P. Clyde, Richard Conwell and Vera P. Pardee. The loss of any one or more of these individuals could place a significant strain on our remaining management team and we may have difficulty replacing any of these individuals. Furthermore, our future growth will depend in part upon our ability to identify, hire and retain additional key personnel, including nuclear imaging technologists, or CNMTs, paramedics, nurses, radiation safety officers, engineers, management, sales personnel and other highly skilled personnel. Hiring qualified management and technical personnel will be difficult due to the limited number of qualified candidates. Competition for these types of employees, particularly CNMTsnuclear imaging technologists and engineers, is intense in the medical imaging field. Given the competition for such qualified personnel, we cannot assure you that we


will be able to continue to attract, hire and retain the personnel necessary to maintain and develop our business. Failure to attract, hire and retain key personnel could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We do not have any employment agreements with, or key person insurance on, any of our employees.

12



        If we choose to acquire new or complementary businesses, products or technologies instead of developing them ourselves, we may be unable to complete those acquisitions or to successfully integrate them in a cost-effective and non-disruptive manner.

        Our success depends on our ability to continually enhance and broaden our product and service offerings in response to changing customer demands, competitive pressures and technologies. While we have no current plans or commitments regarding any acquisitions of new or complementary businesses, products or technologies, we may in the future choose to pursue such acquisitions instead of developing those businesses, products or technologies ourselves. We cannot assure you, however, that we would be able to successfully complete any acquisition we choose to pursue, or that we would be able to successfully integrate any acquired business, product or technology into our company in a cost-effective and non-disruptive manner. Furthermore, there is no certainty that we would be able to attract, hire or retain key employees associated with any acquired businesses, products or technologies.

        Integrating any acquired businesses, products or technologies could be expensive and time consuming, disrupt our ongoing business and divert the attention and resources of our management. If we are unable to integrate any acquired businesses, products or technologies effectively, our business will likely suffer. Additionally, any amortization of assets or charges resulting from the costs of acquisitions could harm our business and operating results.

        We will face additional risks as we expand into international markets.

        We have sales distributors for our imaging systems in Canada and Russia and are beginning to build an international sales organization. As we expand internationally, we will need to hire, train and retain qualified personnel in countries where language, cultural or regulatory impediments may exist. We cannot assure you that distributors, physicians or other involved parties in foreign markets will accept our nuclear imaging products, services and business practices. Our international operations will be subject to inherent risks, including:


        Our manufacturing operations and executive offices will be located at a single facility that may be at risk from fire, earthquakes or other natural or man-made disasters or crises.

        Our manufacturing operations and executive offices will soon beare located at a single facility in Poway, California, near known fire areas and earthquake fault zones. This facility is located a short distance from the recent wildfires that destroyed many homes and businesses in San Diego County, California. We have taken precautions to safeguard our facilities, including insurance and health and safety protocols.

13



However, any future natural disaster, such as a fire or an earthquake, could cause substantial delays in our operations, damage to or destroy our manufacturing equipment or inventory, and cause us to incur additional expenses. A disaster could significantly harm our business and results of operations. The insurance we maintain against fires, earthquakes and other natural disasters may not be adequate to cover our losses in any particular case.

        Additionally, electrical power is vital to our operations and we rely on a continuous power supply to conduct our business. California has experienced significant electrical power shortages and price volatility in recent years, and such shortages and price volatility may occur in the future. In the event of an acute power shortage, the California system operator has on some occasions implemented, and may in the future implement, rolling blackouts throughout California. If our energy costs substantially increase or blackouts interrupt our power supply frequently or for more than a few days, we may have to reduce or temporarily discontinue our normal operations. In addition, the cost of our research and development efforts may increase because of the disruption to our operations. Any such reduction or disruption of our operations at our facilities could harm our business.

        We are exposed to risks relating to product liability, product recalls, property damage and personal injury for which insurance coverage is expensive, limited and potentially inadequate, and our business may be impacted by increased insurance costs.

        Our operations entail a number of risks, including risks relating to product liability claims, product recalls, property damage and personal injury. We currently maintain insurance that we believe is adequate with respect to the nature of the risks insured against, including product liability insurance, professional liability insurance, automobile insurance, property insurance, workers compensation insurance and general liability insurance. In many cases such insurance is expensive and difficult to obtain, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain our current insurance or that we will be able to obtain or maintain comparable or additional insurance in the future on reasonable terms, if at all. Additionally, we may be negatively affected by increased costs of insurance, including workers compensation insurance. For example, in October 2003, the Governor of California signed a bill which, if it takes effect, will require California businesses with 50 or more employees either to pay at least 80% of the premiums for a basic individual health insurance package for each of its employees and their families, or to pay a fee into a state pool for the purchase of health insurance for uninsured, low income workers.

Risks Related to Our Financial Results and Need for Financing

        We have incurred significant and recurring operating losses since our inception in 1985 and we expect to incur increased operating expenses in the near term.

        We have incurred significant net losses since our inception in November 1985, including losses of approximately $19.9 million in 2001, $12.8 million in 2002, and $1.7 million in 2003.2003, and $927,000 and $266,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. As of DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 we had an accumulated deficit of $80.2$80.5 million. We expect to incur increased operating expenses in the near term as we, among other things:




        As a result of these activities, we may not be able to achieve profitability. If our revenue grows more slowly than anticipated, or if our operating expenses exceed our expectations, our ability to achieve our development and expansion goals would be adversely affected.

14



        Our quarterly financial results are difficult to predict and are likely to fluctuate significantly from period to period because our business prospects are uncertain and due to the seasonality of our DIS leasing services business.

        Our revenue and results of operations at any given time will be primarily based on the following factors, many of which we cannot control:

        Additionally,Furthermore, we have experienced seasonality in the leasing services offered by DIS. While our physicians are obligated to pay us for all lease days to which they have committed, our contracts permit some flexibility in scheduling when services are to be performed. This accounts for some of the seasonality of our DIS revenues. For example, our daily services have typically declined from our second fiscal quarter to our third fiscal quarter due to summer holidays and vacation schedules. We have also experienced declining daily services in December due to holidays and in our first quarter due to weather conditions in certain parts of the United States. We cannot predict with certainty the degree to which seasonal circumstances such as the summer slowdown, winter holiday variations and weather conditions may make our revenue unpredictable or lead to fluctuations in our quarterly operating results in the future.

        In addition, due to the way that customers in our target markets allocate and spend their budgeted funds for acquisition of our products, a large percentage of our sales of gamma cameras is booked at the end of each quarterly accounting period. As such, a sales delay of only a few days may significantly impact our quarter-to-quarter comparisons.

For these reasons, we believe that quarterly sales and operating results may vary significantly in the future and that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance. We cannot assure you that our sales will



increase or be sustained in future periods. Accordingly, we may experience significant, unanticipated quarterly losses. Because of these and other factors, our operating results in one or more future quarters may fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which could cause our stock price to decline significantly.

        Our reliance on a limited number of customers may cause our sales to be volatile.

        We currently have a small number of customers, whom we typically bill after the delivery of our products and imaging services. If orders for our gamma cameras were to be cancelled, or our leasing service customers stopped using us or do not renew their lease agreements with us, our business would be adversely affected. Furthermore, in view of our small customer base, our failure to gain additional customers, the loss of any current customers or a significant reduction in the level of leasing services

15



provided to any one customer could disrupt our business, harm our reputation and adversely affect our sales.

        The sales cycle for our gamma cameras is typically lengthy, which may result in significant fluctuations in our revenue.

        Our sales efforts for our gamma cameras are dependent on the capital expenditures budgets of the physicians and hospitals to which we market. Often physicians and hospitals require a significant amount of lead time to plan for a major acquisition such as the purchase of our imaging systems. We may spend substantial time, effort and expense long before we actually consummate a sale of our cameras and with no assurance that we will ultimately be successful in achieving any such sales. As a result, we may experience significant fluctuations in our revenues. Furthermore, evaluating and predicting our future sales and operating performance is difficult and may not be as accurate as it could be if we had shorter sales cycles.

        Our future capital needs are uncertain and we may need to raise additional funds in the future, and such funds may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all.

        We believe that the net proceeds from this offering, together with our current cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, will be sufficient to meet our projected operating requirements for at least the next 12 months. Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

        As a result of these factors, we may need to raise additional funds, and we cannot be certain that such funds will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. Furthermore, if we issue equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, our existing stockholders may experience dilution and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders. In addition, if we raise additional funds through collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish potentially valuable rights to our future products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to expand our operations, develop new products, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated customer requirements.

16



Risks Related to Government Regulation

        We must be licensed to handle and use hazardous materials and may be liable for contamination or other harm caused by hazardous materials that we use.

        We use hazardous and radioactive materials in our research and development and manufacturing processes, as well as in the provision of our imaging services. We are subject to federal, state and local regulations governing use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and waste products. We are currently licensed to handle such materials in all states in which we operate, but there can be no assurances that we will be able to retain those licenses in the future. In addition, we must become licensed in all states in which we plan to expand. Obtaining those additional licenses is an expensive and time consuming process, and in some cases we may not be able to obtain those licenses at all.

        Although we believe that our procedures for use, handling, storing and disposing of these materials comply with legally prescribed standards, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury resulting from hazardous materials and we may incur liability as a result of any such contamination or injury. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines, and the liability could exceed our resources and any applicable insurance.

        We have also incurred and may continue to incur expenses related to compliance with environmental laws. Such future expenses or liability could have a significant negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, we cannot assure you that the cost of complying with these laws and regulations will not materially increase in the future.

        Compliance with extensive product regulations could be expensive and time consuming, and any failure to comply with those regulations could harm our ability to sell and market our products and imaging services.

        U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies, including the FDA, govern the testing, marketing and registration of new medical devices or modifications to medical devices, in addition to regulating manufacturing practices, reporting, labeling and recordkeeping procedures. The regulatory process makes it longer, harder and more costly to bring our products to market, and we cannot assure you that any of our future products will be approved. All of our planned services, products and manufacturing activities, as well as the manufacturing activities of third-party medical device manufacturers who supply components to us, are subject to these regulations. Generally, we and our third-party manufacturers are or will be required to:

        Compliance with the regulations of those agencies may delay or prevent us from introducing new or improved products, which could in turn affect our ability to achieve or maintain profitability. We may be subject to sanctions, including monetary fines and criminal penalties, the temporary or permanent suspension of operations, product recalls and marketing restrictions, if we fail to comply with the laws and regulations applicable to our business. Our third-party component manufacturers may also be subject to the same sanctions and, as a result, may be unable to supply components for our products. Any failure to retain governmental approvals that we currently hold or obtain additional similar approvals could prevent us from successfully marketing our products and technology and could harm our operating results. Furthermore, changes in the applicable governmental regulations could prevent further commercialization of our products and technologies and could harm our business.

        Even if regulatory approval or clearance of a product is granted, regulatory agencies could impose limitations on uses for which the product may be labeled and promoted. Further, for a marketed product,

17




its manufacturer and manufacturing facilities are subject to periodic review and inspection. Later discovery of problems with a product, manufacturer or facility may result in restrictions on the product, manufacturer or facility, including withdrawal of the product from the market or other enforcement actions.

        Our products are subject to reporting requirements and recalls even after receiving FDA clearance or approval, which could harm our reputation, business and financial results.

        We are subject to medical device reporting regulations that require us to report to FDA or similar governmental bodies in other countries if our products cause or contribute to a death or serious injury or malfunction in a way that would be reasonably likely to contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. In addition, the FDA and similar governmental bodies in other countries have the authority to require the recall of our products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. A government mandated or voluntary recall by us could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors or design defects, including defects in labeling. Any recall would divert management attention and financial resources and harm our reputation with customers. A recall involving our product could harm the reputation of the product and our company and would be particularly harmful to our business and financial results.

        If we fail to obtain, or are significantly delayed in obtaining, FDA clearances or approvals for future products or product enhancements, or if we fail to comply with FDA's Quality System Regulation, our ability to commercially market and distribute our products will suffer.

        Our products are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA, and numerous other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. In the U.S., the FDA regulates virtually all aspects of a medical device's testing, manufacture, safety, labeling, storage, recordkeeping, reporting, promotion and distribution. Our failure to comply with those regulations could lead to the imposition of administrative or judicial sanctions, including injunctions, suspensions or the loss of regulatory approvals, product recalls, termination of distribution, or product seizures. In the most egregious cases, criminal sanctions or closure of our manufacturing facilities are possible. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals to market a medical device, particularly from the FDA, can be costly and time consuming, and there can be no assurance that such approvals will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. In particular unless exempt, the FDA permits commercial distribution of a new medical device only after the device has received 510(k) clearance or is the subject of an approved Premarket Approval Application, or PMA. The FDA will clear marketing of a medical device through the 510(k) process if it is demonstrated that the new product is substantially equivalent to other 510(k)-cleared products. The PMA approval process is more costly, lengthy and uncertain than the 510(k) clearance process, and must be supported by extensive data, including data from preclinical studies and human clinical trials. Because we cannot assure you that any new products we develop, or any product enhancements, will be subject to the shorter 510(k) clearance process, significant delays in the introduction of any new products or product enhancements may occur. There is no assurance that the FDA will not require a new product or product enhancement go through the lengthy and expensive PMA approval process. Further, pursuant to FDA regulations, we can only market our products for approved uses. If our products are used for purposes other than those approved by the FDA, the FDA could object to such off-label uses.

        Our manufacturing processes and those of our third-party manufacturers are required to comply with the FDA's Quality System Regulation, or QSR, which covers the design, testing, production processes, controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of our devices. In addition, we must engage in extensive recordkeeping and reporting and must make available our manufacturing facility and records for periodic unscheduled inspections by federal, state and foreign agencies, including the FDA. Our or our third-party manufacturers' failure to pass a QSRQuality System Regulation inspection or to comply with these and other applicable regulatory requirements could result in disruption of our operations and manufacturing delays,

18



and a failure to take adequate corrective action could result in, among other things,



withdrawal of our medical device clearances, seizure or recall of our devices, or other civil or criminal enforcement actions.

        Foreign governmental authorities that regulate the manufacture and sale of medical devices have become increasingly stringent and, to the extent we now or in the future market and sell our products in foreign countries, we may be subject to rigorous regulation by those foreign governmental authorities. In such circumstances, we would rely significantly on our foreign independent distributors to comply with the varying regulations, and any failures on their part could result in restrictions on the sale of our products in foreign countries.

        Modifications to our products may require new 510(k) clearances or premarket approvals, or may require us to cease marketing or recall the modified products until clearances are obtained.

        Any modification to a 510(k)-cleared device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, design, or manufacture, requires a new 510(k) clearance or, possibly, approval of a PMA. The FDA requires every manufacturer to make this determination in the first instance, but the FDA may review any manufacturer's decision. The FDA may not agree with our decisions regarding whether new clearances or approvals are necessary. If the FDA requires us to seek 510(k) clearance or PMA for modification of a previously cleared product for which we have concluded that new clearances or approvals are unnecessary, we may be required to cease marketing or to recall the modified product until we obtain clearance or approval, and we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties. Further, our products could be subject to recall if the FDA determines, for any reason, that our products are not safe or effective. Any recall or FDA requirement that we seek additional approvals or clearances could result in delays, fines, costs associated with modification of a product, loss of revenue and potential operating restrictions imposed by the FDA.

        We will spend considerable time and money complying with federal, state and foreign regulations and, if we are unable to fully comply with such regulations, we could face substantial penalties.

        We are directly or indirectly through our clients, subject to extensive regulation by both the federal government and the states and foreign countries in which we conduct our business. The laws that directly or indirectly affect our ability to operate our business include, but are not limited to, the following:

19



        We implemented a compliance program in 2002 to help assure that we remain in compliance with these laws. Like most companies with active and effective compliance programs, we occasionally discover compliance concerns. For example, we have discovered certain isolated arrangements that we entered into in good faith but that, upon review by our compliance personnel, raised some compliance concerns under these laws. In accordance with our compliance program, we took immediate remedial steps. We cannot assure you that these remedial steps will insulate us from liability associated with these isolated arrangements.

If our past or present operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or the other governmental regulations to which we or our customers are subject, we may be subject to the applicable penalty associated with the violation, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Similarly, if our customers are found non-compliant with applicable laws, they may be subject to sanctions, which could also have a negative impact on us. In addition, if we are required to obtain permits or licensure under these laws that we do not already possess, we may become subject to substantial additional regulation or incur significant expense. Any penalties, damages, fines, curtailment or restructuring of our operations would adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations, and additional legal or regulatory change. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses, divert our management's attention from the operation of our business and damage our reputation. For a more detailed discussion of the various state and federal regulations to which we are subject, and how they apply to our operations and activities, see "Business—Government Regulations."



        Legislative or regulatory reform of the healthcare system may affect our ability to sell our products profitably.

        In both the United States and certain other foreign jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could impact our ability to sell our products and services profitably. In the United States, federal and state lawmakers regularly propose and, at times, enact new legislation establishing significant changes in the healthcare system. Recently, President Bush signed into law the Medicare Modernization Act, which contains a wide variety of reforms that impact Medicare reimbursements to hospitals and physicians including changes to Medicare payment methodologies for radiopharmaceuticals and other drugs dispensed by hospital

20



outpatient departments and for drugs dispensed by physician offices and independent diagnostic testing facilities. These changes reduced payment amounts for some of the drugs used in conjunction with our imaging procedures, although the physician fee schedule payment rates applicable to nuclear cardiology increased slightly. Downward changes to Medicare reimbursement rates may adversely impact reimbursement to customers or potential customers that use or could use our cameras and services. We cannot predict the full impact that this new legislation will have nor whether new federal legislation will be enacted in the future. The potential for adoption of healthcare reform proposals on a state-by-state basis could require us to develop state-specific marketing and sales approaches. In addition, we may experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of our products and services due to additional legislative proposals or healthcare reform initiatives. Our results of operations and our business could therefore be adversely affected by future healthcare reforms.

        The impact of regulatory changes could have a negative impact on camera sales to and leases with hospitals desiring to use our cameras and services in their outpatient facilities.

        In order for hospitals to receive certain payments for their outpatient facilities as hospital outpatient services, including services that utilize our products, these services must be furnished in a "provider- based""provider-based" organization or facility or be covered services furnished "under arrangement" with the hospital. Failure to meet these requirements may result in reduced payments to the hospitals for their services. The Medicare program has published and revised rules establishing criteria for classifying a facility as "provider-based" or a service as furnished "under arrangement." These ratesrules require an analysis of the facts and circumstances surrounding the delivery by a hospital of a particular service, and hospitals that use our products or DIS services in their outpatient facilities will need to determine if they meet the applicable "provider-based" or "under arrangement" requirements. Hospitals that cannot obtain sufficient payments for these services may not purchase a camera from us or enter into arrangements with us for provision of services.

        The application of state certificate of need regulations could harm our business and financial results.

        Some states currently require, or may require in the future, a certificate of need or similar regulatory approval prior to the acquisition of high-cost capital items, including diagnostic imaging systems, or provision of diagnostic imaging services by us or our clients. In many cases, a limited number of these certificates are available in a given state. If we or our clients are unable to obtain the applicable certificate or approval or additional certificates or approvals necessary to expand our operations, these regulations may limit or preclude our operations in the relevant jurisdictions.

        If we fail to comply with various licensure, or certification standards, we may be subject to loss of licensure or certification, which would adversely affect our operations.

        All of the states in which we operate require that the imaging technicians that operate our cameras be licensed or certified. Obtaining such licenses may take significant time as we expand into additional states. Further, we are currently enrolled by Medicare contractors, or "carriers," as an independent diagnostic testing facility or IDTF, in nine states and are seeking such enrollment by Medicare contractors in one additional state. Enrollment is essential for us to receive payment for healthcare services directly from Medicare. There can be no assurances we will be able to maintain such enrollment or that we will be able to gain such



enrollment in other states. Any lapse in our licenses or enrollment, or the licensure or certification of our technicians, could increase our costs and adversely affect our operations and financial results.

        In the healthcare industry, various types of organizations are accredited to facilitate meeting certain Medicare certification requirements, expedite third-party payment and fulfill state licensure requirements. Some managed care providers prefer to contract with accredited organizations. Thus far, we have not found it necessary to seek or obtain accreditation from any established accreditation agency. If it becomes necessary for us to do so in the future in order to satisfy the requirements of third-party payors or

21



regulatory agencies, there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain or continuously maintain this accreditation.

        Audits or denials of our claims, or claims submitted by our DIS customers, by government agencies or contractors could reduce our revenues or profits and expose us to claims.

        Under our "mixed bill" model, we submit claims directly to and receive payments directly from the Medicare program. Therefore, we are subject to extensive government regulation, including requirements for maintaining certain documentation to support our claims. Government agencies and Medicare contractors also may conduct inspections or surveys of our facilities, payment reviews and other audits of our claims and operations. For example, as part of a national audit conducted pursuant to the 2003 work plan, the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or the OIG, conducted a review of one of our IDTFindependent diagnostic testing facilities in early 2003 to review the appropriateness of Medicare payments received. This audit was concluded without any action being taken by the OIG. While we believe this audit will have no impact on us, we cannot assure you that the OIG may not take some follow-up action. We may be subject to investigations, payment reviews and audits and cannot assure you that such scrutiny will not result in material delays in payment, as well as material recoupments or denials, which could reduce our revenue or profits. Our DIS customers also submit claims to Medicare and other third-party payors, are subject to the same types of regulation and scrutiny, and may experience the same types of problems. This could adversely affect our ability to market our leases and services and to maintain existing contracts.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property and Potential Litigation

        Our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology through patents and other means is uncertain.

        Our success depends significantly on our ability to protect our proprietary rights to the technologies used in our products. We rely on patent protection, as well as a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, and nondisclosure, confidentiality and other contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary technology. However, these legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. Our pending U.S. and foreign patent applications, which include claims to material aspects of our products and procedures that are not currently protected by issued patents, may not issue as patents in a form that will be advantageous to us. Any patents we have obtained or do obtain may be challenged by re-examination or otherwise invalidated. Both the patent application process and the process of managing patent disputes can be time consuming and expensive. Competitors may attempt to challenge or invalidate our patents, or may be able to design alternative techniques or devices that avoid infringement of our patents, or develop products with functionalities that are comparable to ours. Although we have taken steps to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology, including entering into confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, advisors and corporate partners, such agreements may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements. Furthermore, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.



        In the event a competitor infringes upon our patent or other intellectual property rights, litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our patents against challenge, even if successful, could be expensive and time consuming and could require significant time and attention from our management. We may not have sufficient resources to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our patents against challenges from others.

        We have entered into a royalty-bearing license for one U.S. patent with a third-party for use in nuclear imaging, which license is co-exclusive with the U.S. government. We do not believe that our current

22



products implement the licensed patent; however, the licensor does not agree. We are currently negotiating to amend the license to resolve our dispute with the licensor. If we were to terminate the license, the licensor or subsequent licensee may allege that our current product infringes the patent, or such third-party licensee may develop and commercialize a competitive photodiode for use in gamma cameras.

        The medical device industry is characterized by patent litigation and we could become subject to litigation that could be costly, result in the diversion of our management's time and efforts, and require us to pay damages.

        The medical device industry is characterized by extensive litigation and administrative proceedings over patent and other intellectual property rights. Whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Our competitors may assert that our products, their components or the methods we employ in the use of our products are covered by U.S. or foreign patents held by them. In addition, they may claim that their patents have priority over ours because their patents were filed or invented earlier. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware, which may later result in issued patents that our products may infringe. There could also be existing patents that one or more components of our products may be infringing of which we are unaware. As the number of participants in our industry increases, the possibility of patent infringement claims against us also increases.

        Any litigation or claims against us may cause us to incur substantial costs, could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of our management from our core business and harm our reputation. If the relevant patents were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to be inadvertently infringing, we could be required to pay substantial damages and/or royalties and could be prevented from selling our products unless we could obtain a license or were able to redesign our system to avoid infringement. Any such license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. If we fail to obtain any required licenses or make any necessary changes to our products or technologies, we may be unable to commercialize one or more of our products.

        We rely significantly on a license agreement with Segami Corporation for the imaging acquisition and processing software for our digital gamma camera, and the loss of the license could result in delivery delays, loss of customers and loss of revenue.

        Segami Corporation, or Segami, has developed image acquisition and processing software for our camera under a non-exclusive license agreement. In the event that Segami attempts to terminate the license agreement, refuses to extend the term of the license or seeks to impose unreasonable pricing or terms, we would have to find an alternative software system to use in our gamma camera. To our knowledge, there are a limited number of companies that would be able to develop and implement a software system similar to what we use in our gamma camera. As a result, in the event that we were unable to continue to use the software under the license from Segami, we could have delays in the production of our gamma camera as we attempted to find a substitute software provider. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee that alternative software providers would be able to meet our requirements or that their software would be available to us at favorable prices, if at all. To the extent we were unable to find an alternative source for the software, we may have to develop our own software system. We cannot guarantee that we could internally develop such a software system or that such efforts would not divert resources away from the development of other features of our camera. As a result, locating an alternative software



system or developing our own software system could interrupt the manufacture and delivery of our products for an extended period of time and may cause the loss of customers and revenue.

        We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we, or our employees, have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

        Many of our employees were previously employed at other medical device companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although no claims against us are currently pending, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets

23



or other proprietary information of their former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management. If we fail in defending such claims, in addition to paying money damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. A loss of key research personnel or their work product could hinder or preclude our ability to commercialize our products, which could severely harm our business.

        If we become subject to product liability or warranty claims, we may experience reduced demand for our products or be required to pay damages that exceed our insurance coverage.

        The sale and support of our products entails the risk of product liability or warranty claims, such as those based on claims that the failure of one of our products resulted in a misdiagnosis, among other issues. The medical device industry has been subject to significant products liability litigation. We may incur significant liability in the event of any such litigation, regardless of the merit of the action. Although we maintain product liability insurance, we cannot be sure that this coverage is adequate or that it will continue to be available on acceptable terms, if at all. We also may face warranty exposure, which could adversely affect our operating results. Any unforeseen warranty exposure or insufficient insurance could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Finally, even a meritless or unsuccessful product liability claim could harm our reputation in the industry, lead to significant legal fees and could result in the diversion of management's attention from managing our business.

        We may be subject to lawsuits and actions brought by our employees.

        We may from time to time be subject to employment claims or disputes. Recently one former and three present employees have retained counsel and have claimed that they are due overtime pay because of an alleged misclassification of their positions as non-exempt rather than exempt employees. These employees have claimed damages equal to back pay of up to thirty days, liquidated damages of twice the amount of overtime pay found due and attorneys' fees. We deny any wrongdoing and intend to defend against these claims vigorously. However, we cannot assure you that we will be successful, or that additional former or present employees may not join in any such action. Any employment claims could significantly divert our management's time and attention and could materially affect our business.

Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of Our Common Stock

        There has been no prior public market for our common stock and an active trading market may not develop.

        Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. An active public trading market for our common stock may not develop or be sustained after the offering. We will negotiate and determine the initial public offering price with representatives of the underwriters and this price may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the trading market. As a result, you may not be able to sell your shares of common stock at or above the offering price. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares and may impair our ability to acquire other businesses, products or technologies by using our shares as consideration.



        Future sales of our common stock may cause our stock price to decline.

        Our current stockholders hold a substantial number of shares of our common stock that they will be able to sell in the public market in the near future. Significant portions of these shares are held by a small number of stockholders. Sales by our current stockholders of a substantial number of shares after this offering, or the expectation that such sale may occur, could significantly reduce the market price of our common stock. Moreover, after this offering, the holders of approximately 12,451,260 shares of common stock, including shares issued upon conversion of our preferred stock and shares issued upon the exercise of certain of our warrants, will have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements to permit the resale of their shares in the public market or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders. Although the holders of most

24



of our outstanding capital stock have agreed with the underwriters of this offering to be bound by a 180-day lock-up agreement that prohibits these holders from selling or transferring their stock, other than in specific circumstances, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., at their discretion, can waive the restrictions of the lock-up agreement at an earlier time without prior notice or announcement and allow our stockholders to sell their shares of our common stock in the public market. If the restrictions of the lock-up agreement are waived, shares of our common stock will be available for sale into the market, subject only to applicable securities rules and regulations, which may cause our stock price to decline.

        We also intend to register all common stock that we may issue under our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and 2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Program and 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.Program. Once we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to restrictions under the securities laws and the lock-up agreements described above. If any of these stockholders cause a large number of securities to be sold in the public market, the sales could reduce the trading price of our common stock. These sales also could impede our ability to raise future capital.

        Our stock price may be volatile, and you may lose all or a substantial part of your investment.

        Following this offering, the market price for our common stock is likely to be volatile, in part because our shares have not been traded publicly. In addition, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including:



        Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law may discourage or prevent a change in control, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders, which could affect our stock price adversely and prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

        Our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws contain provisions that may delay or prevent a change in control, discourage bids at a premium over the market price of our common stock and

25



adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock. These provisions include:

        We are also subject to provisions of the Delaware corporation law that, in general, prohibit any business combination with a beneficial owner of 15% or more of our common stock for five years unless the holder's acquisition of our stock was approved in advance by our board of directors. Although we believe these provisions collectively provide for an opportunity to receive higher bids by requiring potential acquirors to negotiate with our board of directors, they would apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management.

        We may become involved in securities class action litigation that could divert management's attention and harm our business.

        The stock market in general, and the Nasdaq National Market and the market for medical device companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the companies in those markets. In addition to our performance, these broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company's securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. We may become involved in this type of litigation in the future. Litigation often is expensive and diverts management's attention and resources, which could materially harm our financial condition and results of operations.

        As a new investor, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering and future equity issuances and, as a result of such dilution, our stock price could decline.

        The initial public offering price will be substantially higher than the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our outstanding common stock. As a result, investors purchasing common stock in this offering will incur immediate dilution of $$8.95 per share. This dilution is due in large part to earlier investors in our company having paid substantially less than the initial public offering price when they purchased their shares. Investors who purchase shares of common stock in this offering will contribute approximately %46% of the total amount we have raised to fund our operations but will own only



approximately %31% of our common stock. We believe that the net proceeds from this offering, together with our current cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, will be sufficient to meet our projected operating requirements for at least the next 12 months. Because we may require additional funds to develop new products and continue to expand our business, however, we may conduct substantial future offerings of equity securities. The exercise of outstanding options and warrants and future equity issuances, including future public offerings or future private placements of equity securities and any additional shares issued in connection with acquisitions, will result in further dilution to investors.

26



        If our officers, directors and principal stockholders choose to act together, they may be able to control our management and operations, acting in their best interests and not in the best interests of other stockholders.

        After this offering, our officers, directors and holders of 5% or more of our outstanding common stock will beneficially own approximately %36.4% of our common stock, after giving effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock, but assuming no exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option and no exercise of outstanding options or warrants. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, will be able to significantly influence all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions. The interests of this group of stockholders may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders, and they may act in a manner that advances their best interests and not necessarily those of other stockholders. As a result of their actions or inactions our stock price may decline.

        Our management team may invest or spend the proceeds of this offering in ways with which you may not agree or in ways which may not yield a return.

        Our management will have considerable discretion in the application of the net proceeds of this offering. We expect to use a majority of the net proceeds from this offering to manufacture and market our gamma cameras, build our sales and marketing capabilities, expand our DIS business and repay outstanding lines of credit and notes payable of approximately $9.4 million.$9.7 million as of March 31, 2004. To a lesser extent, we anticipate using the remaining net proceeds of this offering for further research and development relating to our existing products and new product opportunities, to finance regulatory approval activities and for general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to acquire or invest in complementary businesses, products, or technologies, or to obtain the right to use such complementary technologies, although we are not currently involved in any negotiations and have no commitments with respect to any such transactions. We cannot specify with certainty how we will use the net proceeds of this offering or our existing cash balance. The net proceeds may be used for corporate purposes that do not increase our operating results or market value. Until the net proceeds are used, theywe plan to invest such proceeds of this offering in short- and medium-term, interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government. These investments may be placed in investments that do not produce income or that losemaintain their value.

27




SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management's beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections entitled "Prospectus Summary," "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Use of Proceeds" and "Business." In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "anticipates," "believes," "could," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "plans," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "should," "will," "would" and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements.

        Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in this prospectus in greater detail under the heading "Risk Factors." Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management's beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

        Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

28




USE OF PROCEEDS

        We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $$64.8 million, based upon an assumed initial public offering price of $$13.00 per share, the midpoint of the range on the cover of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, we estimate that our net proceeds will be approximately $$74.8 million.

        We expect to use a majority of the net proceeds of this offering to manufacture and market our gamma cameras, build our sales and marketing capabilities, expand our DIS business and repay outstanding lines of credit and notes payable of approximately $9.4$9.7 million.

        To a lesser extent, we anticipate using the remaining net proceeds of this offering:

        In addition, we may use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to acquire products, technologies or businesses that are complementary to our own, but we currently have no commitments or agreements relating to any of these types of transactions.

        Of the approximately $9.4$9.7 million of net proceeds that we intend to use to repay outstanding lines of credit and notes payable, we will use approximately $4.83$4.7 million to repay in full our outstanding balance as of DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 under our secured credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank. The secured credit facility may be used to borrow against accounts receivable and fixed assets and our outstanding balance matures in October 2004. The secured credit facility bears an interest rate equal to the lender's prime rate, plus 1.75% per annum, but in no event less than 5.75%.

        Additionally, of the approximately $9.4$9.7 million of net proceeds that we intend to use to repay outstanding lines of credit and notes payable, we will use approximately $4.53$4.5 million to repay in full our outstanding balance as of DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 under our credit facility with GE Healthcare Financial Services. The total amount outstanding under the line of credit matures in December 2004 and the interest rate under such agreement is the greater of the lender's prime rate plus 1.25% per annum, or 6%.

        Furthermore, of the approximately $9.7 million of net proceeds that we intend to use to repay outstanding lines of credit and notes payable, we intend to repay the principal amount outstanding under notes payable held by two of our stockholders which matures within 60 days of the completion of this offering. As of March 31, 2004, the outstanding principal amount under these notes was approximately $490,000 and the notes bear an interest rate of 6.35% per year. We may also enter into a similar agreement to repay the principal amount outstanding under a note held by another stockholder. As of March 31, 2004, the outstanding principal amount under such note, which bears an interest rate of 6.35% per year, was approximately $245,000.

        As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to be received upon the completion of this offering. The amount and timing of our expenditures will depend on several factors, including the amount of revenue generated from our operations, the progress of our commercialization efforts, and the amount of cash used in our operations. Accordingly, our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds and investors will be relying on the judgment of our management regarding the application of the proceeds of this offering. We reserve the right to change the use of these proceeds as a result of certain contingencies such as the results of our commercialization efforts, competitive developments, opportunities to acquire products, technologies or businesses and other factors.



        Pending the uses described above, we plan to invest the net proceeds of this offering in short- and medium-term, interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.


DIVIDEND POLICY

        We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to support operations and finance the growth and development of our business and do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors.




CAPITALIZATION

        The following table sets forth our capitalization as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003:2004:

        You should read this table together with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 
 As of December 31, 2003
 
 Actual
 As Adjusted
 
 (In thousands, except share and per share amount)

Cash and cash equivalents $7,681 $ 
  
 
Total debt:      
 Lines of credit $9,357 $ 
 Long-term debt  6,349   
 Notes payable to stockholders  735   
  
 
   16,441   
  
 
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.000001 par value:      
 46,023,000 shares authorized, 43,555,313 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted  84,278   
Stockholders' equity (deficit):      
 Preferred stock, $0.000001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted     
 Common stock, $0.001 par value: 53,000,000 shares authorized, 82,486 shares issued and outstanding, actual; 150,000,000 shares authorized,            shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted     
 Additional paid in capital  5,031   
 Deferred compensation  (554)  
 Accumulated deficit  (80,180)  
  
 
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)  (75,703)  
  
 
Total capitalization $25,016 $ 
  
 

30


 
 As of March 31, 2004
 
 
 Actual
 As Adjusted
 
 
 (In thousands, except share and per share amount)

 
Cash and cash equivalents $8,902 $64,030 
  
 
 
Total debt:       
 Lines of credit $9,182 $ 
 Long-term debt  5,924  5,924 
 Notes payable to stockholders  735  245 
  
 
 
   15,841  6,169 
  
 
 
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.000001 par value:       
 46,023,000 shares authorized, 43,555,313 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted  84,367   
Stockholders' equity (deficit):       
 Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted     
 Common stock, $0.001 par value: 53,000,000 shares authorized, 54,352 shares issued and outstanding, actual; $0.0001 par value: 150,000,000 shares authorized, 17,998,646 shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted    2 
 Additional paid in capital  6,315  155,480 
 Deferred compensation  (1,489) (1,489)
 Accumulated deficit  (80,535) (80,535)
  
 
 
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)  (75,709) 73,458 
  
 
 
Total capitalization $24,499 $79,627 
  
 
 

        The number of shares in the table above excludes, as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003:2004:

        We expect to complete a 1-for-A 1-for-3.5 reverse stock split prior to completion of this offering.our common stock was approved by our stockholders on April 30, 2004. All share amounts in this prospectus have been adjusted to give effect to this stock split.




DILUTION

        As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, we had a negative net tangible book value of $(76.2) million, or $(923.97)$(1,402.47) per share of common stock, not taking into account the conversion of our outstanding preferred stock. Net tangible book value per share is equal to our total tangible assets (total assets less intangible assets) less total liabilities (including redeemable convertible preferred stock), divided by the number of shares of our outstanding common stock. Our pro forma net tangible book value as of DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 was approximately $8.1 million, or $0.18$0.65 per share of common stock. Pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the pro forma number of shares of common stock outstanding as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. Our pro forma net tangible book value and pro forma net tangible book value per share amounts give effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into shares of common stock.

        Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the difference between the amount per share paid by purchasers of shares of common stock in this offering and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock immediately after the completion of this offering. After giving effect to our sale of 5,500,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $$13.00 per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us, our adjusted pro forma net tangible book value as of DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 would have been $$72.9 million, or $$4.05 per share. This amount represents an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value of $$3.40 per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in pro forma net tangible book value of $$8.95 per share to new investors. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:

Assumed initial public offering price per share   $    $13.00
Net tangible book value per share at December 31, 2003 $(923.97)  
Net tangible book value per share at March 31, 2004 $(1,402.47)  
Pro forma increase in tangible book value attributable to conversion of convertible preferred stock $924.15   $1,403.12  
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2003 $0.18  
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2004 $0.65  
 
   
  
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors   $  $3.40  
   
 
  
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering       4.05
   
Dilution per share to new investors   $    $8.95
   
   

        If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares in this offering, our adjusted pro forma net tangible book value at DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 will be $$82.9 million, or $$4.40 per share, representing an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value of $$3.75 per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in pro forma net tangible book value of $$8.60 per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering.

        The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, after giving effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into common stock, the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by new investors, based on an assumed initial public

32



offering price of $$13.00 per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus,



before deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us:us (consideration in millions):



 Shares Purchased
 Total Consideration
  

 Shares Purchased
 Total Consideration
  


 Average
Price Per
Share


 Average
Price Per
Share



 Number
 Percent
 Amount
 Percent

 Number
 Percent
 Amount
 Percent
Existing stockholdersExisting stockholders 43,637,853  %$   %$ Existing stockholders 12,498,646 69%$85.3 54%$6.83
New investorsNew investors          New investors 5,500,000 31 71.5 46 13.00
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Total   100.0%$  100.0%$ Total 17,998,646 100.0%$156.8 100.0%  
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
  

        If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, our existing stockholders would own %66% and our new investors would own %34% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering.

        The above discussion and tables assume no exercise of any stock options or warrants outstanding as of DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, there were:

        After this offering and assuming the exercise of all in-the-money stock options and warrants outstanding as of March 31, 2004, our pro forma net tangible book value as of March 31, 2004 would be $3.83 per share, representing an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value of $3.18 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in pro forma net tangible book value of $9.17 per share to new investors.

        The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2004, after giving effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into common stock and the exercise of all outstanding in-the-money options and warrants, the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by new investors, based on an assumed initial public offering price of $13.00 per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, before deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us (consideration in millions):

 
 Shares Purchased
 Total Consideration
  
 
 Average
Price Per
Share

 
 Number
 Percent
 Amount
 Percent
Existing stockholders 12,498,646 64%$85.3 54%$6.83
Shares subject to options and warrants 1,641,310 8  2.3 1  1.41
New investors 5,500,000 28  71.5 45  13.00
  
 
 
 
   
 Total 19,639,956 100%$159.1 100%  
  
 
 
 
   

In April 2004, our board of directors approved, effective upon the completion of this offering, our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, under which 1,400,000 shares have been reserved for future issuance, our 2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Program, under which            shares have been reserved for future issuance and our 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Program, under which            shares have been reserved for acquisition by our employees.issuance. To the extent that any outstanding options or warrants are exercised or shares acquired, there will be further dilution to new investors.

        In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to our stockholders.



SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

        The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 and 2003, are derived from the audited financial statements for such years and as of such dates, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, are derived from audited financial statements, which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent auditors, for such years and as of such dates, which are not included in this prospectus. The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2004 and the selected balance sheet data as of March 31, 2004 are derived from our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited consolidated financial statements include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, that management considers necessary for a fair statement of the results of those periods. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The following selected financial data should be read together with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected financial data in this section is not intended to replace the financial statements.

 
 Years ended December 31,
 
Statement of Operations Data:

 1999
 2000
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data amounts)

 
Revenues:                
 DIS $ $1,260 $10,239 $23,005 $34,849 
 Product  284  5,815  18,065  18,527  21,388 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  Total revenues  284  7,075  28,304  41,532  56,237 
Cost of revenues:                
 DIS    839  8,344  16,599  24,463 
 Product  265  9,834  13,192  13,633  15,092 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total cost of revenues  265  10,673  21,536  30,232  39,555 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit (loss)  19  (3,598) 6,768  11,300  16,682 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Research and development  10,063  2,372  3,009  2,967  2,191 
 Sales and marketing  1,455  3,586  9,974  8,066  6,008 
 General and administrative  1,967  2,878  8,161  9,497  8,097 
 Amortization and impairment of intangible assets    194  991  1,011  444 
 Stock-based compensation    311  1,579  606  226 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating expenses  13,485  9,341  23,714  22,147  16,966 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Loss from operations  (13,466) (12,939) (16,946) (10,847) (284)
Other income (expense), net  274  (537) (2,965) (1,925) (1,396)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss $(13,192)$(13,476)$(19,911)$(12,772)$(1,680)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(13,192)$(13,524)$(20,041)$(13,037)$(2,006)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share(1):                
 Historical $(780.49)$(722.22)$(898.86)$(409.23)$(36.46)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Pro forma             $(0.04)
              
 
Shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share(1):                
 Historical  17  19  22  32  55 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Pro forma              43,610 
              
 
The composition of stock-based compensation is as follows:                
 Cost of product revenue       $200 $72 $83 
 Cost of DIS revenue        98  51  31 
 Research and development        96  61  8 
 Sales and marketing        541  228  18 
 General and administrative        644  194  86 
        
 
 
 
        $1,579 $606 $226 
        
 
 
 

34


 
 Years Ended December 31,
 Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
Statement of Operations Data:

 1999
 2000
 2001
 2002
 2003
 2003
 2004
 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data amounts)

 
Revenues:                      
 DIS $ $1,260 $10,239 $23,005 $34,848 $7,503 $10,407 
 Product  284  5,815  18,065  18,527  21,388  5,476  5,461 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues  284  7,075  28,304  41,532  56,236  12,979  15,868 

Cost of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 DIS    839  8,344  16,599  24,463  5,642  7,265 
 Product  265  9,834  13,192  13,633  15,091  3,841  3,639 
 Stock-based compensation    65  298  124  114  1  116 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total cost of revenues  265  10,738  21,834  30,356  39,668  9,484  11,020 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit (loss)  19  (3,663) 6,470  11,176  16,568  3,495  4,848 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Research and development  10,063  2,372  3,009  2,967  2,191  579  640 
 Sales and marketing  1,455  3,586  9,974  8,065  6,008  1,547  1,780 
 General and administrative  1,967  2,878  8,161  9,497  8,097  1,851  2,145 
 Amortization and impairment of intangible assets    194  991  1,011  444  119  16 
 Stock-based compensation    246  1,281  483  112  1  188 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating expenses  13,485  9,276  23,416  22,023  16,852  4,097  4,769 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations  (13,466) (12,939) (16,946) (10,847) (284) (602) 79 
Other income (expense), net  274  (537) (2,965) (1,925) (1,396) (325) (345)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss $(13,192)$(13,476)$(19,911)$(12,772)$(1,680)$(927)$(266)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $(13,192)$(13,524)$(20,041)$(13,037)$(2,006)$(1,012)$(354)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share(1):                      
 Historical $(2,731.92)$(2,527.80)$(3,146.16)$(1,432.31)$(127.62)$(74.63)$(10.88)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Pro forma (unaudited)             $(0.13)   $(0.02)
              
    
 
Shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share(1):                      
 Historical  5  5  6  9  16  14  33 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Pro forma (unaudited)              12,460     12,477 
              
    
 
The composition of stock-based compensation is as follows:                      
 Cost of product revenue    $54 $200 $72 $83 $ $55 
 Cost of DIS revenue     10  98  52  31  1  61 
 Research and development     6  96  61  8    28 
 Sales and marketing     51  541  228  18  1  45 
 General and administrative     190  644  194  86    115 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
     $311 $1,579 $607 $226 $2 $304 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 




 

As of December 31,


 

 


 



 

As of December 31,


 
 As of March 31,
2004

 

 1999
 2000
 2001
 2002
 2003
  1999
 2000
 2001
 2002
 2003
 

 (In thousands)

  (In thousands)

 
Balance Sheet Data:                        
Cash and cash equivalents $2,626 $6,555 $1,967 $6,988 $7,681  $2,626 $6,555 $1,967 $6,988 $7,681 $8,902 
Working capital 801 5,481 (1,668) 3,781 2,578  801 5,481 (1,668) 3,781 2,578 829 
Total assets 5,699 23,050 29,922 33,119 35,159  5,699 23,050 29,922 33,119 35,159 38,012 
Total debt 2,570 8,614 14,469 13,932 16,441  2,570 8,614 14,469 13,932 16,441 15,841 
Redeemable convertible preferred stock 32,259 52,255 66,531 83,952 84,278  32,259 52,255 66,531 83,952 84,278 84,367 
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (31,050) (43,479) (61,835) (73,928) (75,703) (31,050) (43,479) (61,835) (73,928) (75,703) (75,709)

(1)
Please see Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for an explanation of the method used to calculate the historical and pro forma net loss per share the number of shares used in the computation of per share amounts.

35




MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this prospectus, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the "Risk Factors" section of this prospectus for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Overview

        We are a leader in the development, manufacture and distribution of solid-state medical imaging products and services. We were the first company to develop and commercialize a solid-state medical gamma camera for the detection of cardiovascular disease and other medical conditions. Our high performance imaging systems are mobile and provide enhanced operability and reliability and improved patient comfort and utilization when compared to traditional vacuum tube cameras. The cameras and accompanying equipment fit easily into spaces as small as seven feet by eight feet and facilitate the delivery of nuclear medicine procedures directly in a physician's office, an outpatient hospital setting or within multiple departments of a hospital. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, we had an installed base of 300326 gamma cameras, over 95% of which were in the United States, including 5459 cameras operated by our wholly-owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, Digirad Imaging Solutions, Inc. and Digirad Imaging Systems, Inc., orwhich we refer to collectively as DIS.

        According to industry reports, the growth rates in 2002 for procedures performed in physician offices was approximately 44% and in hospitals was approximately 6%. We believe this trend is driven by the desire of cardiologists to control their patients' diagnosis and treatment and to generate revenue that would otherwise be lost if the patient were referred to a hospital or imaging center. The mobile feature of our technology also provides us with a significant advantage in the delivery of nuclear cardiology imaging services. Through DIS, we offer FlexImaging, our mobile and comprehensive leasing service for physicians who wish to perform nuclear cardiology and nuclear medicine procedures in their offices, but do not have the patient volume, capital or personnel to justify purchasing an imaging system. DIS is currently offered in 17 states.states and the District of Columbia. Physicians enter into annual contracts for imaging services delivered on a per-day basis. Our annual lease contracts typically provide for one day of service per week. We sell our imaging systems to physician practices, outpatient clinics and hospitals primarily in the United States and have sold a limited number of imaging systems internationally. Our product revenue consists of sales of our solid-state gamma cameras, custom designed chairs and accessories, such as printers, viewing workstations, connectivity and collimators and revenue from our maintenance contracts.

        In 2000, we sold our first solid-state gamma camera and launched our DIS business. From 2000 to 2003, our consolidated revenues grew from $7.1 million to $56.2 million.million, and were $15.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. DIS and product revenues accounted for 62.0% and 38.0%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003.2003 and 65.6% and 34.4%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Given the recurring contractual revenue stream from our DIS business and our strategy to continue to expand the number of areas where we offer DIS services, we expect DIS revenue to continue to grow at a higher rate than product revenue and to continue to represent a large percentage of consolidated revenues. We attribute the overall growth of our business to geographical expansion, increased market penetration, awareness and acceptance, and the shift in the delivery of nuclear cardiology imaging procedures from hospitals to physician offices.



        We reduced our net loss by $11.1 million from $12.8 million in 2002 to $1.7 million in 2003.2003 and from $927,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 to $266,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Furthermore, we have incurred substantial operating losses since our inception. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our accumulated deficit was $80.2$80.5 million. We believe that we will achieve our first full year of profitability

36



in 2004, and intend to continue to enhance profitability through increased volume and improved margins, although we may incur losses in any given quarter.

        We experience some seasonality in our DIS business as a result of winter holidays, inclement weather and summer slowdowns principally relating to vacations. Historically, these variables have had the least impact on our second quarter operating results.

        We are currently inIn April 2004, we completed the processtransition of transitioning our manufacturing operations from several separate facilities to a single facility in Poway, California. We believe this will consolidate our operations and improve efficiencies. We currently purchase some components from sole source providers and are qualifying or seeking second source providers in an effort to diversify our providers.

Results Of Operations

        The following table sets forth our results from operations, expressed as percentages of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003:2003, and for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2004:



  
  
  
 Three Months Ended
March 31,

 


 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 2003
 2004
 
Revenues:Revenues:       Revenues:           
DIS 36.2%55.4%62.0%DIS 36.2%55.4%62.0%57.8%65.6%
Product 63.8 44.6 38.0 Product 63.8 44.6 38.0 42.2 34.4 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenuesTotal revenues 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 
Cost of revenues:Cost of revenues:           
 Total revenues 100.0 100.0 100.0 DIS 29.5 40.0 43.5 43.5 45.8 
Cost of revenues:       
DIS 29.5 40.0 43.5 Product 46.5 32.8 26.8 29.6 22.9 
Product 46.6 32.8 26.8 Stock-based compensation 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.7 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Total cost of revenuesTotal cost of revenues 76.1 72.8 70.3 Total cost of revenues 77.1 73.1 70.5 73.1 69.4 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profitGross profit 23.9 27.2 29.7 Gross profit 22.9 26.9 29.5 26.9 30.6 
Operating expenses:Operating expenses:       Operating expenses:           
Research and development 10.6 7.1 3.9 
Sales and marketing 35.3 19.4 10.7 
General and administrative 28.8 22.9 14.4 
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets 3.5 2.4 0.8 
Stock-based compensation 5.6 1.5 0.4 
 
 
 
 Research and development 10.6 7.1 3.9 4.5 4.1 
Total operating expenses 83.8 53.3 30.2 Sales and marketing 35.3 19.4 10.7 11.9 11.2 
 
 
 
 General and administrative 28.9 22.9 14.4 14.2 13.5 
Loss from operations (59.9)(26.1)(0.5)
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets 3.5 2.4 0.8 0.9 0.1 
Stock-based compensation 4.5 1.2 0.2 0.0 1.2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating expensesTotal operating expenses 82.8 53.0 30.0 31.5 30.1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operationsIncome (loss) from operations (59.9)(26.1)(0.5)(4.6)0.5 
Other income (expense)Other income (expense) (10.5)(4.6)(2.5)Other income (expense) (10.4)(4.7)(2.5)(2.5)(2.1)
Accretion of deferred issuance costs on preferred stockAccretion of deferred issuance costs on preferred stock (0.4)(0.7)(0.6)Accretion of deferred issuance costs on preferred stock (0.5)(0.6)(0.6)(0.7)(0.6)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss applicable to common stockholdersNet loss applicable to common stockholders (70.8)%(31.4)%(3.6)%Net loss applicable to common stockholders (70.8)%(31.4)%(3.6)%(7.8)%(2.2)%
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 

Comparison of YearsThree Months Ended DecemberMarch 31, 20032004 and 20022003

Revenues

        Consolidated.    Our revenues are divided between two primary operating segments: product sales and our DIS business. Our product revenues consistrevenue consists primarily of selling our solid-state gamma cameras and accessories to physicians, outpatient clinics and hospitals. DIS revenues arerevenue is comprised of performing our DIS services for physicians on a per day basis in accordance with a 12-month lease with annual commitment


levels. Our standard lease terms provide for automatic renewals for an additional 12-month period if the lease is not terminated in writing by the customer generally 90 days or more prior to the end of the term.

        Consolidated revenues increased to $15.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $13.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $2.9 million, or 22.3%, primarily as a result of increased demand for our DIS services. We believe that this increased demand was a result of increased customer awareness and acceptance of our products and services. DIS and product revenue accounted for 65.6% and 34.4%, respectively, of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to 57.8% and 42.2%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2003. We expect DIS revenue to continue to grow at a higher rate than product revenue and to continue to represent a large percentage of consolidated revenue.

        DIS.    Our DIS revenue increased to $10.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $2.9 million, or 38.7%. The increase in DIS revenue resulted from an increase in the number of DIS service days from 2,010 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 to 2,734 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, which was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of physicians purchasing our DIS services. We deployed five additional mobile systems in the first quarter of 2004. Collectively, our DIS business operated 59 mobile and fixed site systems as of March 31, 2004 as compared to 46 as of March 31, 2003. We anticipate that our DIS revenue will increase if we expand into new markets and continue to penetrate existing markets.

        Product.    Our product revenue remained flat at $5.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to the same period of the prior year. While the number of gamma cameras sold increased, our net product revenue decreased by approximately $15,000 primarily because of premiums received on international gamma camera sales for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and in part because of lower average selling prices on our dual-head gamma cameras for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Our Cardius product line represented 73.2% of our product revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to 22.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2003. While we expect pricing pressures on our gamma cameras to continue, we also anticipate demand, particularly for our Cardius product line, will continue to increase, potentially more than offsetting the effects of these pricing pressures.

Gross Profit

        Consolidated.    Consolidated gross profit increased to $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $1.4 million, or 38.7%. Consolidated gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 30.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from 26.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2003, primarily as a result of an increase in revenue, lower per unit DIS imaging service costs and product cost reductions.

        DIS.    Cost of DIS revenue consists primarily of labor, radiopharmaceuticals, equipment depreciation and other costs associated with the provision of services. Our clinical and regulatory headcount relating to our DIS business increased to 150 employees at March 31, 2004 from 121 employees at March 31, 2003. Cost of DIS revenue increased to $7.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $1.6 million, or 28.8%, primarily as a result of our increased direct headcount. DIS gross profit increased to $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $1.3 million, or 68.9%, as a result of increased volumes and reductions in the per unit cost of various items consumed in providing the imaging services. DIS gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 30.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from 24.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2003.

        Product.    Cost of goods sold primarily consists of materials, labor and overhead costs associated with the manufacturing and warranty of our products. Warranty costs are charged to cost of goods sold in the



period our cameras are sold and are based on our historical experience with failure rates and repair costs. Warranty reserves are reviewed monthly and if necessary, warranty expense is adjusted. Cost of goods sold decreased to $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents a decrease of $202,000, or 5.2%. Product gross profit increased to $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $186,000, or 11.4%, primarily as a result of the decrease in cost of goods sold and reduced costs per unit resulting from increased manufacturing volumes, fewer and lower-cost materials and more efficient manufacturing processes used to build our third-generation camera heads introduced in July 2003. Product gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 33.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from 29.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2003.

Operating Expenses

        Research and Development.    Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs associated with the design, development, testing, deployment and enhancement of our products and manufacturing capabilities. The primary costs are salaries and fringe benefits, consulting fees, facilities and overhead charges and nonrecurring engineering costs, such as tooling and other one-time costs associated with manufacturing. Research and development expenses increased to $640,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $579,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $61,000, or 10.5%. This increase was primarily attributable to increased employee headcount to develop new products. Research and development headcount increased to 17 employees at the end of March 31, 2004 from 15 employees at the end of March 31, 2003. In the future, we expect to continue to invest between approximately 10% and 12% of product revenue on research and development as we continue to improve our existing technology and innovate.

        Sales and Marketing.    Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, bonuses, recruiting costs, travel, marketing and collateral materials and tradeshow costs. Sales and marketing expenses increased to $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, from $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $234,000, or 15.1%. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of sales and marketing personnel and expansion of our marketing efforts. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, sales and marketing expenses were 11.2% of total revenue, compared to 11.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2003. We expect to increase our sales and marketing efforts, as we focus on increasing market awareness of our products and offerings.

        General and Administrative.    General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for finance and accounting, human resources and other personnel, as well as legal and other professional fees and insurance. General and administrative expenses increased to $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents an increase of $294,000, or 15.9%. Increases in headcount, insurance costs, recruiting costs and DIS billing and collection fees, all contributed to increased general and administrative expenses. General and administrative headcount was increased by seven employees by the end of March 31, 2004 to 40 employees from 33 employees at the end of March 31, 2003. At the end of March 31, 2004, general and administrative expenses amounted to 13.5% of total revenue compared to 14.3% at the end of March 31, 2003. If the offering contemplated by this prospectus is completed, we will be required to incur additional general and administrative costs to meet various public reporting and compliance requirements.

        Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets.    Intangible assets primarily represent customer contracts relating to our DIS business that we acquired from a third party in 2000 and capitalized patent and trademark portfolio costs, both of which are amortized over their respective useful life. Amortization and impairment of intangibles decreased to $16,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $119,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This decline was principally a result of impairment



charges recorded during fiscal 2003, causing reduced amortization expense in future periods, beginning in the first quarter ended March 31, 2004.

        Stock-Based Compensation Charges.    Deferred compensation for stock options granted has been determined as the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. Options or awards issued to non-employees are recorded at their fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and periodically remeasured in accordance with EITF 96-18 and recognized over the respective service or vesting period. In connection with the grant of stock options to employees, we recorded deferred stock-based compensation of $1.2 million and zero for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We recorded these amounts as a component of stockholders' equity and are amortizing the amount, on an accelerated basis, as a non-cash charge to cost of revenues and operations over the vesting period of the options. In connection with the grant of stock options to employees, we recorded as amortization of stock-based compensation of $304,000 and $2,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We expect that charges to be recognized in future periods from amortization of deferred compensation related to employee stock options grants will be $293,000, $226,000 and $185,000 for the three months ended June 30, September 30 and December 31 of 2004, respectively, and $996,000, $485,000, $231,000 and $70,000 for the years ending December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

Other Income (Expense)

        Interest expense decreased to $323,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $336,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents a decrease of $13,000, or 3.9%. The reduction is a result of a decrease in the variable interest rates on two accounts receivable credit lines and a reduction on capital leases.

        Other expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2004 represented a loss on disposals of assets.

Net Loss

        Net loss decreased to $266,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $927,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, which represents a decrease of $661,000, or 71.3%, as a result of the factors described above.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

Revenues

        Consolidated.    Consolidated revenues in 2003 increased to $56.2 million from $41.5 million in 2002, which represents an increase of $14.7 million, or 35.4%, primarily as a result of increased demand for our DIS services and our Cardius products. We believe that this growth was due to increased customer awareness and acceptance of our products and services.

37



        DIS.    Our DIS revenue increased to $34.8 million in 2003 from $23.0 million in 2002, which represents an increase of $11.8 million, or 51.5%. The increase in DIS revenue resulted from an increase in the number of DIS service days from 6,567 for the year ended December 31, 2002 to 9,425 for the year ended December 31, 2003, which was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of physicians purchasing our DIS services and increases in the amount of services purchased by existing physician customers.services. To respond to this increased demand, we deployed eight additional mobile systems. We anticipate that our DIS revenue will increase if we expand into new markets and continue to penetrate existing markets.systems in the year ended December 31, 2003. DIS revenue accounted for 62.0% of total revenues in 2003 versus 55.4% in 2002. Collectively, our DIS business operated 54 mobile and fixed site systems as of December 31, 2003.

        Product.    Our product revenue increased to $21.4 million in 2003 from $18.5 million in 2002, which represents an increase of $2.9 million, or 15.4%. This increase was due to increased sales of our gamma cameras and maintenance contract revenue. We sold 79 cameras in 2003 compared to 7475 cameras in 2002. Product revenue accounted for 38.0% of total revenues for 2003 versus 44.6% in 2002. Maintenance contract revenues were $2.1 million in 2003 and $521,000 in 2002.


Gross Profit

        Consolidated.    Consolidated gross profit increased to $16.7$16.6 million in 2003 from $11.3$11.2 million in 2002, which represents an increase of $5.4 million, or 47.6%48.2%. Consolidated gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 29.7%29.5% in 2003 from 27.2%26.9% in 2002 primarily as a result of an increase in revenue, lower per unit DIS imaging service cost and product cost reductions.

        DIS.    Cost of DIS revenue consists primarily of labor, radiopharmaceuticals, equipment depreciationOur clinical and other costs associated with the provision of services. Our directregulatory headcount relating to our DIS business increased to 137 employees at the end of 2003 from 112 employees at the end of 2002. Cost of DIS revenue increased to $24.5 million in 2003 from $16.6 million in 2002, which represents an increase of $7.9 million, or 47.4%. As a result, DIS gross profit increased to $10.4 million in 2003 from $6.4 million in 2002, which represents an increase of $4.0 million, or 62.1%., as a result of increased volumes and reductions in the per unit cost of various items consumed in providing the imaging services. DIS gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 29.8% in 2003 from 27.8% in 2002. The increase was primarily a result of increased volumes and improving the per unit cost of various items consumed in providing the imaging services.

        Product.    Cost of goods sold primarily consists of materials, labor and overhead costs associated with the manufacturing of our products.    Cost of goods sold increased to $15.1 million in 2003 from $13.6 million in 2002, which represents an increase of $1.5 million, or 10.7%. As a result, productProduct gross profit increased to $6.3 million in 2003 from $4.9 million in 2002, which represents an increase of $1.4 million, or 28.6%., as a result of the increase in the volume of cameras produced, fewer and lower-cost materials and more efficient manufacturing processes due to the introduction of our third-generation camera heads. Our third-generation camera heads consist of fewer and lower-cost materials than our earlier generation camera heads and are produced using more efficient processes that have reduced overhead and labor costs compared to historical rates. Product gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 29.4% in 2003 from 26.4% in 2002. The increase was primarily a result of the increase in the volume of cameras produced and cost reductions in manufacturing materials and manufacturing processes due to the introduction of our third-generation camera heads in July 2003.

Operating Expenses

        Research and Development.    Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs associated with the design, development, testing, deployment and enhancement of our products and manufacturing capabilities. The primary costs are salaries and fringe benefits, consulting fees, facilities and overhead charges and nonrecurring engineering costs.    Research and development expenses decreased to $2.2 million in 2003 from $3.0 million in 2002, which represents a decrease of $776,000, or 26.2%, primarily as a result of our efforts to develop and launch our Cardius camera product line in 2002. Research and development headcount increased to 16 employees in 2003 from 14 employees in 2002. In the future, we expect to continue to invest between approximately 10% and 12% of product revenue on research and development as we continue to improve our existing technology and innovate.

        Sales and Marketing.    Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, bonuses, recruiting costs, travel, marketing and collateral materials and tradeshow costs. Sales and

38



marketing expenses decreased to $6.0 million in 2003 from $8.1 million in 2002, which represents a decrease of $2.1 million, or 25.5%. In late 2002, we restructured the management of the sales organization and modified the compensation structure, resulting in a significant reduction in sales expense both in dollars and as a percent of revenue. In 2003, sales and marketing expenses were 10.7% of total revenue versus 19.4% in 2002. We expect to increase our sales and marketing efforts in relation with any revenue growth, as we focus on increasing market awareness of our products and offerings.

        General and Administrative.    General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for finance and accounting, human resources and other personnel, as well as legal and other professional fees.    General and administrative expenses decreased to $8.1 million in 2003 from $9.5 million in 2002, which represents a decrease of $1.4 million, or 14.7%. Reduced outside legal expenses, which were partially offset by the addition of in-house general counsel, and a reduction in headquarters headcount, all contributed to lower general and administrative expenses. General and administrative headcount was reduced by one employee by the end of 2003 to 33 employees versus 34 employees at the end of 2002. In 2003, general and administrative expenses amounted to 14.4% of total revenue versus 22.9% in 2002. If the offering contemplated by this prospectus is completed, we will be required to incur additional general and administrative costs to meet various public reporting and compliance requirements.

        Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets.    Intangible assets primarily represent customer contracts relating to our DIS business that we purchased from a third party in 2000 and capitalized patent and trademark portfolio costs, both of which are amortized over their respective useful life.    Amortization and impairment of intangibles decreased to $444,000 in 2003 from $1.0 million in 2002. The significant decline from 2002 to 2003 was principally a result of impairment charges recorded in 2002 associated with these purchased contracts.

        Stock-Based Compensation Charges.    Deferred compensation for stock options granted has been determined as the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. Options or awards issued to non-employees are recorded at their fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and periodically remeasured in accordance with EITF 96-18 and recognized over the respective service or vesting period. In connection with the grant of stock options to employees, we recorded deferred stock-based compensationas amortization of $781,000 and zero for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We recorded these amounts as a component of stockholders' equity and are amortizing the amount, on an accelerated basis, as a non-cash charge to operations over the vesting period of the options. We recorded stock-based compensation of $226,000 and $606,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We expect that charges to be recognized in future periods from amortization of deferred compensation related to employee stock options grants will be $318,000, $152,000, $69,000 and $16,000 for the years ending December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. During February and March of 2004, we granted options to purchase 879,300 shares of common stock to employees and board members. We anticipate recording deferred stock compensation of approximately $1.3 million for the difference between the original exercise price per share determined by our board of directors and the revised estimate of fair value per share.



Other Income (Expense)

        Interest expense decreased to $1.4 million in 2003 from $2.0 million in 2002, which represents a decrease of $558,000, or 28.1%. The reduction is a result of a decrease in the variable interest rates on two accounts receivable credit lines and a reduction on capital leases, and $243,000 of debt discount associated with our $1.9 million bridge financing in 2002.

        Interest income decreased to $35,000 in 2003 from $65,000 in 2002, which represents a decrease of $30,000, or 45.6%, primarily due to lower interest rates in 2003 on cash and cash equivalent accounts.

39



Net Loss

        Net loss decreased to $1.7 million in 2003 from $12.8 million in 2002, which represents a decrease of $11.1 million, or 86.8%, as a result of the factors described above.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

Revenues

        Consolidated.    Our consolidated revenues increased to $41.5 million in 2002 from $28.3 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $13.2 million, or 46.7%. This increase was due primarily to a significant increase in DIS imaging services volume as DIS began to achieve more market acceptance.

        DIS.    Our DIS revenue increased to $23.0 million in 2002 compared to $10.2 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $12.8 million, or 124.7%, resulting primarily from geographical expansion and market acceptance. Our DIS revenue accounted for 55.4% of total revenues in 2002 versus 36.2% in 2001.

        Product.    Our product sales revenue increased to $18.5 million in 2002 from $18.1 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $462,000, or 2.6%, in 2002. The minor increase was a result of our decision to flatten the sales and marketing organization, resulting in a low product sales growth rate over the prior year. Product revenue accounted for 44.6% of total revenues in 2002 versus 63.8% in 2001.

Gross Profit

        Consolidated.    Consolidated gross profit increased to $11.3$11.2 million in 2002 from $6.8$6.5 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $4.5$4.7 million, or 67.0%72.8%. Consolidated gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 27.2%26.9% in 2002 from 23.9%22.9% in 2001, primarily as a result of a year-to-year increase in revenue and lower cost per day to perform our DIS services.

        DIS.    Cost of DIS revenue increased to $16.6 million in 2002 from $8.3 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $8.3 million, or 98.9%. As a result, DIS gross profit increased to $6.4 million in 2002 from $1.9 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $4.5 million, or 238.1%., as a result of increased volume and other servicing efficiencies as DIS expanded geographically within the United States. DIS gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 27.8% in 2002 from 18.5% in 2001. The increase was primarily a result of increased volume and other servicing efficiencies as DIS expanded geographically within the United States.

        Product.    Cost of goods sold increased to $13.6 million in 2002 from $13.2 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $440,000, or 3.3%. As a result, productProduct gross profit remained flat at $4.9 million from 2001 to 2002. Product gross marginprofit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 26.4% in 2002 from 27.0% in 2001.

Operating Expenses

        Research and Development.    Research and development expenses were $3.0 million in both 2001 and 2002. Although we reduced the number of employees in 2002, the launch of the Cardius camera line and associated expenses offset any reductions in research and development expenses. We reduced our research and development headcount in 2002 to 14 employees from 25 employees at the end of 2001. Research and development expenses amounted to 7.1% of consolidated revenues in 2002 versus 10.6% in 2001.


        Sales and Marketing.    Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $8.1 million in 2002 from $10.0 million in 2001, which represents a decrease of $1.9 million, or 19.1%. The decrease in sales and marketing expense was related primarily to reductions in our sales and marketing personnel in early 2002 as we repositioned ourselves to focus on profitable growth. Sales and marketing headcount was reduced to 29 employees at the end of 2002 versus 50 employees at the end of 2001. Sales and marketing expenses amounted to 19.4% of consolidated revenues in 2002 compared to 35.3%35.2% in 2001.

40



        General and Administrative.    General and administrative expenses increased to $9.5 million in 2002 from $8.2 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $1.3 million, or 16.4%. The increase resulted primarily from increases in accounting, human resource and other administrative headcount expenses and settlement fees in 2002. General and administrative expenses amounted to 22.9% of consolidated revenues in 2002, compared to 28.8% in 2001.

        Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets.    Amortization of intangible assets is primarily amortization of capitalized costs associated with purchased contracts and capitalized patent and trademark costs; both are amortized over their respective useful life. Amortization and impairment of intangible assets was constant year-to-year, $1.0 million in 2002 and 2001.

        Stock-Based Compensation Charges.    Total stock-based compensation decreased to $606,000, or 62.7%, in 2002 from $1.6 million in 2001, which represents a decrease of $972,000, or 61.6%, as the remaining deferred compensation was recorded in 2002.

Other Income (Expense)

        Interest expense increased to $2.0 million in 2002 from $1.4 million in 2001, which represents an increase of $551,000, or 38.3%. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in the accounts receivable credit line borrowings and an increase in capital equipment lease lines for DIS equipment. We also incurred $243,000 of expense in conjunction with our bridge financing in 2002.

        Interest income decreased to $65,000 in 2002 from $118,000 in 2001, which represents a decrease of $53,000, or 44.9%, due to the termination of a camerasales-type lease to a customer in 2002. The lease was entered into in 2001 and is the only sales-type lease we have ever recorded. We have no intention to enter into other sales-type lease arrangements in our forseeable future.

        Other expenses were $1.6 million in 2001, which were related to the costs incurred in connection for a proposed initial public offering which was not completed.

Net Loss

        Net loss decreased to $12.8 million in 2002 from $19.9 million in 2001, which represents a decrease of $7.1 million, or 35.9%. Net loss in 2001 decreased as a result of the factors described above.

Liquidity And Capital Resources

General

        We require capital principally for operating our DIS business, interest payments, working capital, debt service and capital expenditures. Our capital expenditures consist primarily of manufactured DIS cameras, computer hardware and software. Working capital is required principally to finance accounts receivable and inventory. Our working capital requirements vary from period to period depending on manufacturing volumes, the timing of deliveries and the payment cycles of our customers and payors.

        We have historically funded our operations principally through private equity financings supplemented with credit lines, equipment financing arrangements and cash from operations. We completed seven private placements of preferred stock between March 1995 and June 2002, yielding aggregate net proceeds of approximately $83.5 million. At DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our outstanding borrowings



totaled $16.4$15.8 million. Based upon our current level of expenditures, we believe proceeds from this offering, together with cash flows from operating activities, availability under our current or future revolving credit lines will be adequate to meet our anticipated cash requirements for interest payments, working capital, debt service and capital expenditures for the next 12 months.

        Our preferred stock is redeemable on or after July 31, 2004 upon the request of certain preferred stock investors. We must redeem all outstanding shares of our preferred stock by paying in cash its redemption value plus declared but unpaid dividends.dividends which, as of March 31, 2004, equaled a total of $119.4 million. No dividends have been declared through DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. If the funds of our company that are legally available for redemption are insufficient to redeem the total number of preferred shares to be redeemed, those funds which are legally available

41



must be used to redeem the maximum possible number of shares pro rata among the various series of preferred stock. Upon completion of this offering all of our outstanding shares of preferred stock automatically will convert into 12,444,294 shares of our common stock. If the offering contemplated by this prospectus is not completed, and the redeemable preferred shares remain outstanding, we do not anticipate having legally available funds to redeem any portion of the preferred shares in 2004.

        As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, cash and cash equivalents totaled $7.7$8.9 million compared to $7.0$7.7 million at December 31, 2002.2003. We currently invest our cash reserves in money market funds.

        Net cash provided by operations was approximately $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Net cash used in operating activities amounted to approximately $52,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Net cash provided in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was primarily a result of increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities that were expensed and accrued in March 2004 but paid in April 2004, augmented by non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization of stock-based compensation. Cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2003 resulted primarily from operating losses and net increases in accounts receivable resulting from the growth in our business.

        Net cash provided by operations was $158,000 in 2003. Net cash used in operating activities amounted to approximately $9.8 million and $16.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. For these periods, net cash used in operating activities resulted primarily from operating losses and net increases in accounts receivable resulting from the growth in our business.

        Accounts receivable were $12.6 million, $12.2 million, $7.9 million and $4.8 million at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The $452,000 or 3.7% increase at the end of March 31, 2004 compared to the end of December 31, 2003, was as a result of increased DIS revenue. The $4.3 million or 55.0% increase at the end of 2003 compared to the end of 2002, was a result of revenue growth in DIS and increased product deliveries. The $3.1 million or 63.8% increase at the end of 2002 compared to the end of 2001 was attributable primarily to the increase in product deliveries, and the significant increase in DIS revenue. Inventories were $3.7 million, $3.7 million, $5.8 million and $8.6 million at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The $2.0 million or 35.5% decrease at the end of 2003 compared to the end of 2002, was a result of the our efforts to reduce inventory levels during 2003 and the introduction of lower-cost key components that resulted in lower inventory carrying amounts. The $2.9 million, or 33.3%, decrease at the end of 2002 compared to the end of 2001 was due primarily to our carrying more inventories at the end of 2001 as we were ramping up for anticipated growth.

        Net cash used in investing activities amounted to approximately $1.3 million and $333,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Investing activities consist primarily of DIS servicing units and other capital expenditures.

Net cash used in investing activities amounted to approximately $2.0 million, $1.8 million and $7.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively. Investing activities consist primarily of DIS servicing units and other capital expenditures.



        ��Net cash used by financing activities amounted to approximately $584,000 and $593,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Repayment of credit line borrowings and capital lease obligations were primarily responsible for the net cash used by financing activities.

Net cash provided by financing activities amounted to approximately $2.5 million, $16.6 million and $20.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Private placements of our preferred stock and proceeds from bank borrowings, lease financings and credit line borrowings were primarily responsible for the net cash provided by financing activities.

Working Capital

        We believe that DIS and product revenues will continue to increase. We believe that a majority of this increase will occur in the cardiology office market from the use of DIS service, which could increase the average collection period of our consolidated accounts receivable duereceivable. The average collection period has historically been longer for DIS revenue than for product revenue. For the twelve-months ended March 31, 2004, our average days-sales-outstanding was approximately 75 days for our DIS revenue and approximately 50 days for our product revenue. During the twelve-month period ended March 31, 2004, we were able to reduce the extended payment cycles we experience in that business.DIS days-sales-outstanding by approximately 15 days. We have adoptedimproved our DIS collection efforts through the adoption of a number of policies and procedures to reduce these extended payment cycles,focused on reducing the time following the performance of our services and believe thatinvoicing the doctors or other payors. We anticipate continued reductions in collection times of DIS receivables; however, we willexpect DIS collection times to continue to improvebe longer than product sales collection turnaround times. For example, at the end of 2003, DIS revenues grew 51.5% over 2002, whereas the receivables increased 22.7% over 2002.times based on our historical experience. If consolidated accounts receivable increase, we will use available cash on hand to fund the increase. We expect, without taking into account our receipt of the estimated net proceeds of this offering, that cash on hand, cash flow from operations and additional borrowings under our new revolvingexisting lines of credit facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs over the next 12twelve months.

Debt Service

        In January 2001, we entered into a loan and security agreement for a revolving line of credit to provide working capital for our DIS business. We are authorized to draw up to $5.0 million and the borrowings under the line of credit, as amended in March 2004, accrue interest at the higher of 6.0% or prime plus 1.25%. This revolving line of credit expires in December 2004. As of March 31, 2004, our outstanding balance under this loan and security agreement totaled $4.5 million. We intend to repay this loan in full with proceeds from this offering.

        In October 2003, we renewed an agreement for a $5.0 million revolving line of credit to provide working capital for our product sales. Borrowings under this line of credit accrue interest at the bank's floating prime rate plus 1.75% and are limited based on a formula that takes into account eligible amounts of accounts receivables, inventory and other factors. We are required to make monthly interest payments on this line of credit, which expires in October 2004, with any unpaid balance due upon expiration. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, our outstanding balance under this facility was $4.8 million. We intend to repay this loan in full with proceeds from this offering.

        In January 2001, we entered into a loan and security agreement for a revolving line of credit to provide working capital for our DIS business. We are authorized to draw up to $5.0 million and the borrowings under the line of credit, as amended in March 2004, accrue interest at the higher of 6.0% or prime plus 1.25%. This revolving line of credit expires in December 2004. As of December 31, 2003, our outstanding balance under this loan and security agreement totaled $4.5$4.7 million. We intend to repay this loan in full with proceeds from this offering.

        In the event we are unable to complete the offering, we believe we can renew our credit lines or access alternate sources of financing based on the improvement in our operating results and our cash flow.

        We have notes payable to our stockholders totaling $735,000, which bear interest at 6.35% per year. WeBeginning March 31, 2004, we are obligated to repay these notes equally over the 12 quarters, beginningwith the first payment payable on May 15, 2004 and subsequent payments due on the 45th day after the end of each following quarter. On May 7, 2004, we entered into an agreement with the holders of certain of the notes payable in which we agreed to make the first quarterly payment under their respective notes on May 10, 2004. We also agreed to repay the principal amount outstanding under their respective notes within 60 days of the completion of this offering. As of March 31, 2004.2004, the outstanding principal balance under these notes was approximately $490,000. We may also enter into a similar agreement to repay the principal

42




amount outstanding under a note held by another stockholder. As of March 31, 2004, the outstanding principal balance under this note was approximately $245,000.

        As of DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, we had capital lease obligations totaling $6.3$5.9 million. These obligations are secured by the specific equipment financed under each lease and will be repaid monthly over the lease terms, which range from 48 to 63 months. Our DIS subsidiary entered into the majority of these capital lease obligations.

        We are committed to making future cash payments on notes payable to our stockholders, capital leases (including interest), operating leases and lines of credit. We have not guaranteed the debt of any other party. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):


 Payments due by period
 Payments Due by Period
Contractual obligations

 Total
 Current
 1-3 years
 3-5 years
 More than
5 years

 Total
 Current
 1-3 years
 3-5 years
 More than
5 years

Notes payable to stockholders $735 $245 $245 $245 $ $735 $245 $245 $245 $
Capital lease obligations 7,505 2,741 4,197 567  7,505 2,741 4,197 567 
Operating lease obligations 3,861 696 1,376 1,170 619 3,861 696 1,376 1,170 619
Lines of credit 9,357 9,357     9,357 9,357   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total $21,458 $13,039 $5,818 $1,982 $619 $21,458 $13,039 $5,818 $1,982 $619
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        Our exposure to market risk due to changes in interest rates relates primarily to the increase or decrease in the amount of interest income we can earn on our investment portfolio and on the increase or decrease in the amount of interest expense we must pay on our various outstanding debt instruments. Our risk associated with fluctuating interest rates is limited, however, to certain of our long-term debt and capital lease obligations, all of which have interest rates that are closely tied to market rates, and our investments in interest rate sensitive financial instruments. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. We attempt to increase the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities. A hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments. Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce our interest income while increases in interest rates over time will increase our interest expense.

Inflation

        We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our business or operating results during the periods presented.

Related Party Transactions

        For a description of our related party transactions, see the section of this prospectus entitled "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."

Critical Accounting Policies

        The Securities and Exchange Commission defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in management's opinion, very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. In preparing our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, we must often make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses



and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Some of those judgments can be subjective and complex. Consequently, actual results could differ from our

43



estimates. The accounting policies that are most subject to important estimates or assumptions include those described below.

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 when each of the following four criteria are met:

        For our product revenue, these criteria are usually met upon delivery. Our DIS revenue is recorded once the services and disposables are provided and consumed, which is normally on the day of the service. Reductions to product revenue are recorded to provide for payment adjustments and credit memos.memos and historically have not been significant. Reductions to our DIS revenue are recorded to provide for payment adjustments and credit memos. In addition, we establish reserves against our DIS revenue to allow for uncollectible items relating to patient co-payments and contractual allowances and other adjustments, based on historical collection experience.

Accounts Receivable and AllowanceReserves for Doubtful Accounts, Billing Adjustments and Contractual Allowances

        Historically, the need to estimate reserves for accounts receivable has been limited to our DIS business. We provide reserves for billing adjustments, contractual allowances and doubtful accounts. DIS payment adjustments and credit memos are adjustments for billing errors that are normally adjusted within the first 90 days subsequent to the performance of service, with the majority occurring within the first 30 days. Reserves are provided as a percentage of DIS revenue based on historical experience rate. We primarily bill the physicians under contract directly, and in a minority of cases, we are reimbursed under government programs, Medicare or by private insurance companies. We provide reserves for contractual allowances for billings to Medicare and insurance companies based on our collection experience rates. We use a combination of factors in evaluating the collectibility of accounts receivable. We generally establish reserves for bad debt based on the length of time that the receivables are past due. Each account is reviewed on at least a quarterly basis and a percentage varying from zero to 100% for each account is established. We do not establish reserves for accounts with a history of payment without disputes. We generally reserve between 20% and 50% of the outstanding balance for accounts that are more than 180 days late and under dispute. We reserve 100% of the outstanding balance for accounts that we believe constitute a high risk of default based on factors such as level of dispute, payment history and our knowledge of a customer's inability to meet its obligations. We also consider bad debt write-off history. Our estimates of collectibility could be reduced by material amounts by changed circumstances, such as a higher number of defaults or material adverse changes in a payor's ability to meet its obligations.

        In 2003, we provided approximately 2% of our DIS revenues to establish our reserves. The provisions for billing adjustments and contractual allowances are charged against DIS revenues and the provision for doubtful accounts is charged to general and administrative expenses.

Long-Lived Assets

        We state property and equipment and purchased contracts at cost. We capitalize betterments, which extend the useful life of the equipment. We calculate depreciation on property and equipment and purchased contracts on the straight-line method over the estimated useful live (three to seven years for property and equipment and five years for purchased contracts) of the assets. We follow Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which requires impairment losses to be



recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount. If such assets are considered to be impaired, we measure the impairment be recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. We have taken impairment charges on certain customer contracts purchased during 2000 from Nuclear Imaging Systems, Inc. and Florida Cardiology, Inc. Assets are examined for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that may indicate a potential asset impairment.

Inventory

        We state inventories at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market (net realizable value). Costs include material, labor and manufacturing overhead costs. Inventory expected to be converted into equipment to be used as mobile imaging units in DIS is classified as property and equipment. We review our inventory balances monthly for excess sale products or obsolete inventory levels. Except where firm

44



orders are on-hand, we consider inventory quantities of sale products in excess of the last 12 months' demand as excess and reserve for them at levels between 20% and 50% of cost, depending on our knowledge and forecast for the product. We establish obsolescence reserves on an increasing basis from 0% for active, high-demand products, to 100% for obsolete products. We review the reserve periodically and, if necessary, make adjustments. We rely on historical information to support our reserve and utilize management's business judgment. Once the inventory is written down, we do not adjust the reserve balance until the inventory is sold.

Warranty

        We provide a warranty on certain of our products and accrue the estimated cost at the time revenue is recorded. Historically, the warranty periods have ranged from up to 24 months. Since July 2002, substantially all of the warranty periods have been 12 months before customer-sponsored maintenance begins. Warranty reserves are established based on historical experience with failure rates and repair costs and the number of units at customers covered by warranty. We review warranty reserves monthly and, if necessary, make adjustments.

New Accounting Pronouncements

        In November 2002, the FASB issued FIN 45,Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures required in financial statements concerning obligations under certain guarantees. We adopted the disclosure requirements of this interpretation that were effective on December 31, 2002. The recognition provisions of the interpretation are effective in 2003 and are applicable only to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. We have not issued or modified any such guarantees and accordingly the interpretation did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. FIN No. 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46R, a revision to FIN No. 46. FIN No. 46R provides a broad deferral of the latest date by which all public entities must apply FIN No. 46 to certain variable interest entities to the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. We do not expect the adoption of FIN No. 46 or FIN No. 46R to have a material impact upon our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150,Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

45




BUSINESS

Overview

        We are a leader in the development, manufacture and distribution of solid-state medical imaging products and services for the detection of cardiovascular disease and other medical conditions. We designed and commercialized the first solid-state gamma camera. Our initial focus is nuclear cardiology imaging procedures performed with gamma cameras, which we believe generate revenue of approximately $10.0 billion annually. Our target markets are primarily physician practices and outpatient clinics, which we believe constitute approximately 25% of this total market, or $2.5 billion.

        By utilizing solid-state technology rather than bulky vacuum tubes, we believe that our imaging systems maintain image quality while offering significant advantages over vacuum tube-based systems, including mobility through reduced size and weight, enhanced operability and reliability, and improved patient comfort and utilization. Due to size and other limitations of vacuum tube cameras, nuclear imaging has traditionally been confined to dedicated and customized space within a hospital or imaging center. The mobility of our imaging systems enables us to deliver nuclear imaging procedures in a wide range of clinical settings—physician offices, outpatient clinics or within multiple departments in a hospital.

        We sell our imaging systems to physicians, outpatient clinics and hospitals. In addition, through our wholly-owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, Digirad Imaging Solutions, Inc. and Digirad Imaging Systems, Inc., orwhich we refer to collectively as DIS, we also offer a comprehensive and mobile imaging leasing and services program, called FlexImaging, for physicians who wish to perform nuclear cardiology imaging procedures in their offices but do not have the patient volume, capital or resources to justify purchasing a gamma camera. DIS provides physician customers with an imaging system, certified personnel, required licensure and other support for the performance of nuclear imaging procedures under the supervision of our physician customers. Physicians enter into annual contracts for imaging services delivered on a per-day basis. DIS currently operates 2321 regional hubs and seveneight fixed sites and performs services in 17 states.states and the District of Columbia.

        The mobility of our imaging systems and the flexibility of our leasing service allow cardiologists to provide nuclear imaging procedures in their offices to patients that they historically had to refer to hospitals or imaging centers. As a result, we provide physicians with more control over the diagnosis and treatment of their patients and enable physicians to capture revenue from procedures that would otherwise be referred to these hospitals and imaging centers.

        Nuclear imaging is a clinical diagnostic tool that has been in use for over 40 years with reimbursement codes established since 1971. According to industry sources, approximately 18.4 million nuclear imaging procedures were performed in the United States in 2002, of which 9.9 million procedures were cardiac applications, a volume that is expected to grow by approximately 25% annually over the next three years. We estimate that the growth rate in 2002 for nuclear imaging procedures performed in physician offices was approximately 44% and in hospitals was approximately 6%. We expect the mobility of our imaging systems will continue to allow us to capitalize on this shift in the delivery of nuclear cardiology imaging services from hospitals to physician offices.

        The target market for our products is the approximately 30,000 cardiologists in the United States that perform or could perform nuclear cardiology procedures. To date, we have sold or provided imaging services through DIS to approximately 500 physicians. In 2003, DIS performed over 66,000 patient procedures.

        We sold our first gamma camera in March 2000 and we established DIS in September 2000. We had consolidated revenues and net losses of $41.5 million and $12.8 million, respectively, in fiscal 2002, and $56.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in fiscal 2003.2003 and $15.9 million and $266,000, respectively, in the three months ended March 31, 2004. Revenue from DIS and from our camera sales constituted 62% and 38%, respectively, of our 2003 consolidated revenues.revenues and 66% and 34%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004. We believe DIS will continue to



provide us with recurring annual contractual revenue and comprise the largest component of our consolidated revenue.

46



Market Opportunity

Nuclear Imaging

        Nuclear imaging is a form of diagnostic imaging in which depictions of the internal anatomy or physiology are generated primarily through non-invasive means. Diagnostic imaging facilitates the early diagnosis of diseases and disorders, often minimizing the scope, cost and amount of care required and reducing the need for more invasive procedures. Currently, five major types of non-invasive diagnostic imaging technologies are available: x-ray; magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI;imaging; computerized tomography, or CT;tomography; ultrasound; and nuclear imaging.

        Nuclear imaging measures varying degrees of physiological activity. Physicians use the images and related clinical information to determine whether to refer patients to more invasive diagnostic or therapeutic treatments. Nuclear imaging is provided through two primary technologies, gamma cameras and dedicated positron emission tomography, or PET, machines. According to industry sources, despite the improved image quality from PET machines, gamma cameras are used for a substantial majority of nuclear imaging procedures. We believe this preference is due to the lower purchase and maintenance costs, smaller physical footprint and easier service logistics of gamma cameras. The most widely used imaging acquisition technology utilized in gamma cameras is single photon emission computed tomography, or SPECT. All of our current cardiac gamma cameras utilize SPECT.

Clinical Applications for Nuclear Imaging

        Nuclear imaging is used primarily in cardiovascular, oncological and neurological applications. Nuclear imaging involves the introduction of very low-level radioactive chemicals, called radiopharmaceuticals, into the patient's body. The radiopharmaceuticals are specially formulated to concentrate temporarily in the specific part of the body to be studied. A system comprised of a gamma camera detector and computer is then used to detect the radiation signal emitted by the chemicals and to convert that signal into an image of the body part or organ. Nuclear imaging, in contrast to other diagnostic imaging modalities, shows not only the anatomy or structure of an organ or body part, but also its function—including blood flow, organ function, metabolic activity and biochemical activity. According to industry sources, the following nuclear imaging procedures were performed with gamma cameras in the United States in 2002:


Nuclear Cardiology

        We believe that the 9.9 million nuclear cardiology procedures performed annually in the United States with gamma cameras generate revenue of approximately $10.0 billion. Our target market for DIS services is primarily physician practices and outpatient clinics, which we believe constitute approximately 25% of this total market, or $2.5 billion. In addition, the market for gamma camera sales across all care settings in the United States is estimated to be over $450approximately $440 million annually.

        According to industry sources, nuclear cardiology procedures are expected to grow by approximately 25% annually over the next three years. We believe the growth of these procedures will be driven by the expected increase in coronary heart disease. According to the American Heart Association, this increase in



heart disease will result from the aging of baby boomers and the record rate of obesity and diabetes in all age groups.

47



        Increasingly, a nuclear cardiology procedure is the first non-invasive, diagnostic imaging procedure performed on patients with suspected heart disease. Following the imaging study, the physician will determine the need for more invasive and expensive diagnostic procedures or therapeutic treatments. These treatments may include angiography, which is an x-ray procedure by which catheters are inserted into an artery or vein to take pictures of blood vessels; angioplasty, which is a procedure by which catheters with balloon tips are used to widen narrowed arteries; or open heart surgery. Given the clinical advantages of nuclear cardiac images, many payors require patients to complete a nuclear cardiology procedure before undergoing more invasive diagnostic procedures and therapeutic treatments.

        The target market for our gamma camera sales and the FlexImaging services offered by DIS are the approximately 30,000 cardiologists in the United States that perform nuclear cardiology procedures. We have sold cameras or leased our services through DIS to approximately 500 physicians. In 2003, DIS performed over 66,000 patient procedures. We sell our imaging systems and provide our FlexImaging services to hospitals that provide nuclear cardiology procedures on either an outpatient or inpatient basis, and to physicians that provide these procedures in their offices. According to industry reports, the growth rate in 2002 for procedures performed in physician offices was approximately 44%, and in hospitals was approximately 6%. We believe this trend is driven by the desire of cardiologists to control their patients' diagnosis and treatment and to capture revenues from procedures that would otherwise be referred to hospitals or imaging centers. The unique mobility of our imaging systems allows us to capitalize on this shift from hospital-based imaging to physician office-based imaging.

Competitive Strengths

        We believe that our position as a market leader in the nuclear cardiac imaging market is a product of the following competitive strengths: