AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON MAY 17, 2004 APRIL 19, 2007
REGISTRATION NOS. 333-_____; 333-104892; 333-82768; 333-100983 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 333- 


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ------------------------------ LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS,

CICERO INC. (Exact
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) DELAWARE 11-2920559 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number)
DELAWARE
11-2920559
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
7372 SERVICES, PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE ------------------------------ (PrimaryServices, Prepackaged Software

(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code) 214 CARNEGIE CENTER, SUITE 303, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 08540 (609) 987-9001 (Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant's Principal Executive Offices) ------------------------------ JOHN P. BRODERICK CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. 214 CARNEGIE CENTER, SUITE 303, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 08540 (609) 987-9001 ------------------------------ (Name,
1433 State Highway 34
Farmingdale, New Jersey 07727
(732) 919-3150
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

John P. Broderick
Chief Financial Officer
Cicero Inc.
1433 State Highway 34
Farmingdale, New Jersey 07727
(732) 919-3150

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service) COPIES OF COMMUNICATIONS TO: SCOTT D. SMITH, ESQ. POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER

Copies to:

Lawrence M. Bell, Esq.
Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & MURPHYPeskoe LLP SIXTEENTH FLOOR 191 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E. ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 (404) 572-6600 ------------------------------ APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
437 Madison Ave
New York, NY, 10022 
(212) 907-7300

Approximate Date of Commencement of Proposed Sale to the Public: From time to time or at one time after the effective date of this registration statement as determined by the selling stockholders.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. [X] x

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ] o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ] o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ] o

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. [ ] o

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED
AMOUNT TO BE
REGISTERED
PROPOSED
MAXIMUM OFFERING
PRICE PER SHARE(1)
PROPOSED MAXIMUM
AGGREGATE OFFERING
PRICE
AMOUNT OF
REGISTRATION FEE
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (2)40,641,978$1.11$45,122,595.62$1,384.96
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE - --------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- --------------------- PROPOSED PROPOSED MAXIMUM TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF SECURITIES TO AMOUNT TO BE MAXIMUM OFFERING AGGREGATE OFFERING AMOUNT OF BE REGISTERED REGISTERED PRICE PER UNIT PRICE REGISTRATION FEE - --------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------
(1)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c ) under the Securities Act of 1933 and based upon the average high and low prices of the registrant’s common stock on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board on April 16, 2007.

(2)Includes Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock), and Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (issuable upon the exercise of warrants. This Registration Statement also carries forward the registration of 449,476 shares of Level 8 Systems common stock, $.001 par value 13,307,135 (1) $ 0.29 (2) $ 3,859,069 (2) $ 595 - --------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- --------------------- on Form S-1 filed May 18, 2004. A Registration Fee $595 of was previously paid to register such securities.
(1)




The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

Pursuant to Rule 429 of the Securities Act of 1933, the prospectus which is a part of this Registration Statement is a combined prospectus and includes all the information currently required in a prospectus relating to the securities covered by Registration Statement Nos. 333-115580, 333-104892, 333-82768 and 333-100983 previously filed by Registrant. This Registration Statement, also carries forwardconstitutes a Post-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement Nos. 333-115580, 333-104892, 333-82768 and 333-100983.



The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration of 21,079,805 shares by Level 8 Systems, Inc. of common stock, $.001 par value on Form S-1,statement filed May 1, 2003, Registration Number 333-104892,with the Securities and 4,583,540 shares by Level 8 Systems, Inc. of common stock, $.001 par value, on Form S-3, filed February 14, 2002, Registration Number 333-82768Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and 7,693,058 shares of common stock, $.001 par value, on Form S-3, filed on November 4, 2002, Registration Number 33-100983. A Registration Fee of was previously paidit is not soliciting an offer to register such securities. (2) Estimated solely forbuy these securities in any jurisdiction where the purpose of computing the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) based on the average high and lowoffer or sale prices of the Company's stock on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board on May 10, 2004. THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE. PURSUANT TO RULE 429 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, THE PROSPECTUS WHICH IS A PART OF THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT IS A COMBINED PROSPECTUS AND INCLUDES ALL THE INFORMATION CURRENTLY REQUIRED IN A PROSPECTUS RELATING TO THE SECURITIES COVERED BY REGISTRATION STATEMENT NOS. 333-104892, 333-82768 AND 333-100983 PREVIOUSLY FILED BY REGISTRANT. THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT, ALSO CONSTITUTES A POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT TO REGISTRATION STATEMENT NOS. 333-104892, 333-82768 AND 333-100983. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- is not permitted.


SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MAY 17, 2004 APRIL 19, 2007

PROSPECTUS 42,018,051 SHARES LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS,

40,641,978

CICERO INC. [LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. LOGO]


This prospectus relates to the resale of up to 42,018,05140,641,978 shares of our common stock, $.001 par value, which are being offered for resale from time to time by the stockholders named in the section entitled "Selling Stockholders"“Selling Stockholders” on page 8.9. The number of shares the selling stockholders may offer and sell under this prospectus includes common shares: o the selling stockholders currently hold; o issuable to them upon the conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock; and, o issuable to them upon the exercise of warrants previously issued by us. The selling stockholders may also offer additional shares of common stock acquired upon conversion of convertible preferred stock or exercise of the warrants as a result of anti-dilution provisions, stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions. stock:

·the selling stockholders currently hold;
·issuable to them upon the conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock; and
·issuable to them upon the exercise of warrants previously issued

We are registering these shares to satisfy registration rights of the selling stockholders.

We are not offering or selling any shares under this prospectus and we will not receive any of the proceeds from any resales by the selling stockholders. We will,may, however, receive the proceeds from the exercise of the warrants issued to the selling stockholders. The selling stockholders may sell the shares of common stock from time to time in various types of transactions, including on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board and in privately negotiated transactions. For additional information on methods of sale, you should refer to the section entitled "Plan“Plan of Distribution"Distribution” on page 16. .

On May 11, 2004,April 16, 2007, the last sales price of the common stock quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board was $0.29$1.11 per share. Our company's common stock is quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol "LVEL." INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 3. “CICN.”

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 3.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY OTHER REGULATORY BODYSTATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

The date of this Prospectus is ____________


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUSi
Prospectus Summary..........................................................................1 Summary1
Risk Factors................................................................................3 Factors3
Use of Proceeds.............................................................................7 Proceeds8
Price Range of Our Common Stock.............................................................7 Stock8
Dividend Policy.............................................................................7 Policy8
Selling Stockholders........................................................................8 Stockholders9
Plan of Distribution.......................................................................16 Distribution27
Selected Consolidated Financial Data.......................................................18 Data28
Business ..................................................................................19 Properties.................................................................................28 29
Properties42
Legal Proceedings..........................................................................28 Management'sProceedings42
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.....29 Operations44
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates..............................................43 Management.................................................................................46 Estimates51
Management55
Executive Officers.........................................................................47 Executive Compensation.....................................................................49 Compensation58
Principal Stockholders.....................................................................51 Stockholders60
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.......................................53 Transactions62
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.......53 Disclosure64
Description of Capital Stock...............................................................53 Stock64
Legal Matters..............................................................................54 Experts....................................................................................54 Matters65
Experts
65
Available Information......................................................................55 Information65
Index to Financial Statements.............................................................F-1 StatementsF-1
------------------------------
_____________________________

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS This prospectus is a part of a registration statement that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission using a "shelf registration" process.

You should read this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement, as well as any post-effective amendments to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, together with the additional information described under "Available Information"“Available Information” before you make any investment decision.

The terms "Level 8," "we," "our"“Cicero,” “we,” “our” and "us"“us” refer to Level 8 Systems,Cicero Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context suggests otherwise. The term "you"“you” refers to a prospective purchaser of our common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts presented are in thousands, except per share amounts.

You should not rely only on theany information other than contained in this prospectus or any accompanying prospectus supplement. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus or any accompanying prospectus supplement. These securities are being offered for sale and offers to buy these securities are only being solicited in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement is accurate only as of the date on their respective covers, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any accompanying prospectus supplement or any sale of the securities.

i


SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains certain forward-looking statements, includingmade pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and do not relate solely to current or related tohistorical facts but address our future results, including certain projections and business trends. Assumptions relating to forward-looking statements involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. When used in this prospectus, the words "estimate," "project," "intend," "believe," "expect"“estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward- looking statements. Although we believe that assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate, and we may not realize the results contemplated by the forward-looking statement. Management decisions are subjective in many respects and susceptible to interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments, the impact of which may cause us to alter our business strategy or capital expenditure plans that may, in turn, affect our results of operations. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included in this prospectus, you should not regard the inclusion of such information as our representation that we will achieve any strategy, objective or other plans.plans, and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus speak only as of the date of this prospectus as stated on the front cover, and we have no obligation to update publicly or revise any of these forward-looking statements. These and other statements, which are not historical facts are based largely on management'smanagement’s current expectations and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplate by such forward-looking statements. These risk and uncertainties include, among others, the risks and uncertainties described in "Risk Factors" (page 3). “Risk Factors” and the following:

·There is substantial doubt as to whether we can continue as a going concern;

·We have a history of losses and expect that we will continue to experience losses at least through mid 2007;

·We develop new and unproven technology and products;

·We depend on an unproven strategy for ongoing revenue;

·Economic conditions could adversely affect our revenue growth and cause us not to achieve desired revenue;

·The so-called “penny stock rule” could make it cumbersome for brokers and dealers to trade in our common stock, making the market for our common stock less liquid which could cause the price of our stock to decline;

·Because we cannot accurately predict the amount and timing of individual sales, our quarterly operating results may vary significantly, which could adversely impact our stock price;

·Loss of key personnel associated with Cicero® development could adversely affect our business;

·Different competitive approaches or internally developed solutions to the same business problem could delay or prevent adoption of Cicero®;

·Our ability to compete may be subject to factors outside our control;

·The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, and frequent new product introductions;

·We may face damage to the reputation of our software and a loss of revenue if our software products fail to perform as intended or contain significant defects;

ii


·We may be unable to enforce or defend our ownership and use of proprietary and licensed technology;

·Our business may be adversely impacted if we do not provide professional services to implement our solutions;

·Because our software could interfere with the operations of customers, we may be subject to potential product liability and warranty claims by these customers;

·We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and it is likely that no cash dividends will be paid in the future; and

·Provisions of our charter and bylaws and Delaware law could deter takeover attempts.

iii

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” and the financial statements, before making an investment decision. References to "we," "our," "Level 8"“we,” “our,” “Cicero” and the "Company"“Company” generally refer to Level 8 Systems,Cicero Inc., a Delaware corporation.

We provide next generation applicationbusiness integration productssoftware, which enables organizations to integrate new and services that are based on open technology standards and are licensed to a varied range of customers. Our software helps organizations leverage their extensive system and business process investments, increase operational efficiencies, reduce costs and strengthen valued customer relationships by uniting disparate applications, systems,existing information and processes at the desktop. Our business integration software addresses the emerging need for companies’ information systems to deliver enterprise-wide views of their business information processes.In addition to software products, the Company also provides technical support, training and consulting services as part of its commitment to providing its customers with industry-leading integration solutions. The Company’s consulting team has in-depth experience in developing successful enterprise-class solutions as well as valuable insight into the business information needs of customers in the largest 5000 corporations worldwide (the “Global 5000”).

Our focus is on the emerginggrowing desktop integration and business process automation market with our Cicero(R)Cicero® product. CiceroCicero® is a business application integration software productplatform that maximizesenhances end-user productivity, streamlines business operations and integrates systems and applications that would not otherwise work together. CiceroCicero® software offers a proven, innovative departure from traditional, costly and labor-intensive approaches toenterprise application integration, thatwhich occurs at the server level. Cicero® provides non-invasive application integration at the desktop level. Desktop level integration provides the user with a single environment with a consistent look and feel for diverse applications across multiple operating environments, reduces enterprise integration implementation cost and time, and supports a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA).

By using Cicero® software, companies can decrease their customer management costs, improve their customer service and more efficiently cross-sell the full range of their products and services resulting in an overall increase in return on their information technology investments. In addition, Cicero® software enables clientsorganizations to transformreduce the business risks inherent in replacement or re-engineering of mission-critical applications and extend the productive life and functional reach of their application portfolio.

Cicero® software is engineered to integrate diverse business processesapplications and human expertise intoshape them to more effectively serve the people who use them. Cicero® provides an intuitive integration and development environment, which simplifies the integration of complex multi-platform applications. Cicero® can streamline end-user tasks by providing a single, seamless cost effective business solution that providesuser interface for simple access to multiple systems or be configured to display one or more composite applications to enhance productivity. Our software enables automatic information sharing among line-of-business applications and tools.

Cicero® software is ideal for deployment in contact centers where its highly productive, task-oriented user interface promotes user efficiency. By integrating diverse applications across multiple operating systems, Cicero® software is also ideal for the financial services, for which Cicero® was initially developed, insurance, telecommunications, intelligence, security, law enforcement, governmental and other industries requiring a cohesive, task-oriented and role-centric interface that is designed to work the way people think. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS cost-effective, proven application integration solution.

Recent Developments

In April 2004,February 2007, we entered intocompleted a convertible loan agreement with Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in the amountprivate sale of $100,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan is convertible into 270,270 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 270,270a group of investors, two of which are members of our Board of Directors. Under the terms of that agreement, we sold 3,723,008 shares of our common stock exercisablefor $0.1343 per share for a total of $0.5 million. Participating in this consortium were Mr. Mark Landis, who is our current Chairman and Mr. Bruce Miller, who is a Board member. Mr. Landis acquired 77,460 shares for a $10,000 investment and Mr. Miller acquired 148,920 shares for a $20,000 investment.

In December 2006, we completed our Plan of Recapitalization, approved by our stockholders at $0.37.a Special Stockholders Meeting held on November 16, 2006. The warrants expire in three years. On March 1, 2004, we entered into a consulting services agreement with Mr. Ralph F. Martino. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to issue 66,667 shares per month, up to an aggregate of 200,001 shares of our common stock, as compensation for services rendered overPlan included the following three month period. On March elements:

1 2004, we entered into a reseller/consulting agreement with Pyxislink. Under the terms of the agreement, we agreed to issue warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock quarterly, over the next four quarters. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the issue date and the exercise price is $0.38 per share.


·Provided our Board of Directors with discretionary authority, pursuant to the plan of recapitalization to effect a reverse stock at a ratio of 20:1 to 100:1, and on November 20, 2006 our Board of Directors fixed the ratio at 100:1;

·Changed the name of the Company from Level 8 Systems, Inc. to Cicero Inc.;

·Increased the authorized common stock of the Company from 85 million shares to 215 million shares;

·Converted existing preferred shares into a new Series A-1 Preferred Stock;

·Converted and cancelled senior reorganization debt in the aggregate principal amount of $2.3 million into 3,438,473 shares of common stock;

·Converted the aggregate principal amount of $3.9 million of convertible bridge notes into 30,508,448 shares of our common stock;

·Converted each share of Series A3 Preferred Stock into 4.489 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock;

·Converted each share of Series B3 Preferred Stock into 75 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock;

·Converted each share of Series C Preferred Stock into 39.64 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock;

·Converted an aggregate principal amount of $1,060,562 of Series D Preferred Stock, recorded as mezzanine financing, into 53 Preferred Stock; and

·Converted an aggregate principal amount of $992,000 of convertible promissory notes into 1,591 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

In March 2004, we entered into a convertible loan agreement with Mark and Carolyn Landis, who are related by marriage to Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan is convertible into 446,429 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 446,429 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.28. The warrants expire in three years. We also entered into convertible loan agreements with Frederick Mack and C. Glen Dugdale, each in the face amount of $50,000. Under the terms of the agreement, each loan is convertible into 135,135 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 135,135 shares of our common stock at $0.37 per share. The warrants expire in three years. In March 2004, pursuant to an existing agreement, we issued 150,000 shares of common stock to Liraz Systems Ltd. in consideration for extension of the debt guarantee to Bank Hapoalim. On January 9, 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail(R). The acquisition was completed using our common stock. The aggregate purchase price of the assets and liabilities was seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000.00). We issued 2,027,027 common shares as consideration for the purchase. The primary assets acquired in the acquisition were Critical Mail, Inc.'s federally certified Ensuredmail(R) e-mail encryption technology and products. Concurrent with the acquisition of the assets of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., we completed a common stock financing round wherein we raised $1,247,000 of capital from several new investors as well as certain investors of Critical Mass Mail. We sold 3,369,192 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. As part of the financing, we also issued warrants to purchase 3,369,192 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.37. The warrants expire three years from the date of grant. 1 On October 15, 2003, we completed a private placement of 1,894,444 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 473,611 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable at $0.45 per share of common stock and have a three year term. We received $852,500 in aggregate proceeds and used $200,000 of the proceeds to pay down our term loan. On November 15, 2003,2006, we reached an agreement with Bank Hapoalim, the holder of our term loan and Liraz, Systems Ltd. ("Liraz"), the guarantor of the term loan, to extend the maturity date of the term loan until November 14, 2004.October 31, 2007. In consideration for the extension of the guaranty, we issued 150,000to Liraz 60,000 shares of our common stock to a designated subsidiary of Liraz and agreed to issue an additional 150,000 shares on March 31, 2004. ------------------------------ stock.


We were incorporated as Level 8 Systems, Inc. in New York in 1988 and re-incorporated in Delaware in 1999. Effective January 2003,In November 2006, our stockholders approved the change of our name to Cicero Inc. Our principal executive offices were relocated to 214 Carnegie Center, Suite 303, Princeton,are located at 1433 State Highway 34, Farmingdale, New Jersey 08540, and our07727. Our telephone number is (609) 987-9001. Our(732) 380-9150 and our web site is located at www.level8.com.www.ciceroinc.com. Information contained on our web site is not a part of this prospectus.

2


RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the specific risk factors listed below together with the other information included in this prospectus before you decide whether to purchase shares of our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, including those that are not yet identified or that we currently think are immaterial, may also adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The market price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you could lose all or part of your investment. WE DEPEND ON AN UNPROVEN STRATEGY FOR ONGOING REVENUE. In 2001,

There is substantial doubt as to whether we determinedcan continue as a going concern.

Because we incurred net operating losses of approximately $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and losses from continuing operations of approximately $13.4 million for the previous two fiscal years, we experienced negative cash flows from operations, had significant working capital deficiencies as of December 31, 2006, and because we are relying on acceptance of a newly developed and marketed product, there is substantial doubt that our best possibility of long- term success would bewe can continue to concentrate our sales efforts into the customer contact centers of large companies, where the customer service representatives of our target market interact with their customers via telephone, facsimile, electronic mail and other means of communication.operate as a going concern. The success of our strategy is highlyCompany’s future revenues are entirely dependent on market acceptance of Cicero,a newly developed and marketed product, Cicero®, which we have licensed from Merrill Lynch. Cicero has no track recordhad limited success in commercial markets to date. These factors among others raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The Company is experiencing difficulty increasing sales torevenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about the financial services industry and there is no certainty that we will have strong market penetration with our Cicero offering. Cicero was officially launched in a general release version in June 2001.viability of the Company. While we have limited significant sales of Ciceroattracted some additional capital to date, we have yetcontinue to establish a predictable revenue stream. A previous version of Cicero has been in use on over 30,000 workstations at Merrill Lynch for approximately five years. We have substantially modified the version of Cicero used at Merrill Lynch to introduce a commercial product that may be implemented in our target markets. Furthermore, we have ceased our sales and marketing efforts with respect to our historical revenue producing products, the Geneva Integration Suite line of products, and our historical business of Enterprise Application Integration at the server level. We have sold all assets associated with the Geneva AppBuilder software, which represented approximately 59% of our revenue in fiscal year 2001. We also sold our Geneva Message Queuing and XIPC products in the third quarter of 2001 and our Star/SQL and CTRC products in second quarter of 2002. In October 2002, we sold our Systems Integration business, which consisted of Geneva Enterprise Integrator, and Geneva Business Process Automator. These sales represent substantially all of the products in our Messaging and Application Engineering segment and all the products in our Systems Integration Segment. Our past performance and revenues therefore provide no indication of our future prospects and revenues. Our new strategy is subject to the following specialized risks that may adversely affect our long-term revenue and profitability prospects: o Cicero was originally developed internally by Merrill Lynch and has no track record of successful sales to organizations within the financial services industry and may not gain market acceptance; o We are approaching a different segment of the financial services industry, the customer contact center, compared to our sales and marketing efforts in the past andfund operations, there can be no assurance that we can successfully sellobtain additional financing and market into this industry; and o if we do obtain financing that it will be on terms that are favorable to us or our stockholders.

We have had very limited success because the financial conditiona history of the Company has caused concern for enterprise customerslosses and expect that would be dependent on Cicero for their long-term needs. WE HAVE A HISTORY OF LOSSES AND EXPECT THAT WE WILL CONTINUE TO EXPERIENCE LOSSES AT LEAST THROUGH 2004. we will continue to experience losses at least through mid 2007.

We experienced operating losses and net losses infor each of the years from 1998 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and for the three months ended March 31, 2004.through 2006. We incurred a net loss of $25.1 million for 1998, $15.5 million for 1999, $28.4 million for 2000, $105.1 million for 2001, $18.2 million for 2002, $10.0 million for 2003, $9.8 million in 2004, $3.7 million in 2005 and $2.6$3.0 million for the three months ending March 31, 2004.in 2006. As of MarchDecember 31, 2004,2006, we had a working capital deficit of $6.7$7.9 million and an accumulated deficit of $215$234 million. Our ability to generate positive cash flow is dependent upon achieving and sustaining certain cost reductions and generating sufficient revenues.

Therefore, due to these and other factors, we expect that we will continue to experience net losses through the endfirst half of 2004.2007. We have not generated sufficient revenues to pay for all of our operating costs or other expenses and have relied on financing transactions over the last threeseveral fiscal years to pay our operating costs and other expenses. We cannot predict with accuracy our future results of operations and believe that any period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not meaningful. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that if we are unable to generate sufficient revenue from operations that we will be able to continue to access the capital markets to fund our operations, or that if we are able to do so that it will be on satisfactory terms. 3 THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT AS TO WHETHER WE CAN CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN. Because

We develop new and unproven technology and products.

Historically, the Company has been a global provider of software solutions to help companies integrate new and existing applications as well as extends those applications to the Internet. This market segment is commonly known as Enterprise Application Integration or EAI. Historically, EAI solutions work directly at the server or back-office level allowing disparate applications to communicate with each other.

Until early 2001, we incurred net operating lossesfocused primarily on the development, sale and support of $2.6 millionEAI solutions through our Geneva product suite. After extensive strategic consultation with outside advisors and an internal analysis of our products and services, we decided to focus on the growing desktop and business process automation market with our Cicero® product. Our technology and our products are unproven and we have been actively marketing them since 2001. The markets for the three months ended March 31, 2004our products are characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and $10.0 millionshort product life cycles. Our future success will depend to a substantial degree upon our ability to market and enhance our existing products and to develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products and features that meet changing customer requirements and emerging and evolving industry standards.

3


We depend on an unproven strategy for the year ended December 31, 2003, weongoing revenue.

Our future revenues are entirely dependent on acceptance of Cicero® which has had limited success in commercial markets to date. We have experienced negative cash flows from operations for the past three years. At December 31, 2006, we had significanta working capital deficiencies at March 31, 2004, and because we are relying on acceptancedeficiency of a newly developed and marketed product,approximately $7.9 million. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt that wethe Company can continue as a going concern, and the independent auditor’s report accompanying our financial statements raises doubt about our ability to operatecontinue as a going concern. WhileIn order to address these issues and to obtain adequate financing for our operations for the next twelve months, we have attracted some additional capital toare actively promoting and expanding our product line and continue to fund operations,negotiate with significant customers who have demonstrated interest in the Cicero® technology. We are experiencing difficulty increasing sales revenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about our financial viability. Cicero® software is a new “category defining” product in that most EAI projects are performed at the server level and Cicero®’s integration occurs at the desktop level without the need to open and modify the underlying code for those applications being integrated. Many companies are not aware of this new technology or tend to look toward more traditional and accepted approaches. We are attempting to solve the former problem by improving the market’s knowledge and understanding of Cicero® through increased marketing and leveraging its limited number of reference accounts while enhancing its list of resellers and system integrators to assist in the sales and marketing process. Additionally, we are seeking additional equity capital or other strategic transactions in the near term to provide additional liquidity.

Our new strategy is subject to the following specialized risks that may adversely affect our long-term revenue and profitability prospects:

·Cicero® was originally developed internally by Merrill Lynch and has no track record of successful sales to organizations within the financial services industry and may not gain market acceptance;
·We are approaching a different segment of the financial services industry, the customer contact center, compared to our sales and marketing efforts in the past and there can be no assurance that we can successfully sell and market into this industry; and
·We have had very limited success because the financial condition of the Company has caused concern for enterprise customers that would be dependent on Cicero® for their long-term needs.

Economic conditions could adversely affect our revenue growth and cause us not to achieve desired revenue.

Our ability to generate revenue depends on the overall demand for desktop integration software and services. Our business depends on overall economic conditions, the economic and business conditions in our target markets and the spending environment for information technology projects, and specifically for desktop integration in those markets. A weakening of the economy in one or more of our geographic regions, unanticipated major events and economic uncertainties may make more challenging the spending environment for our software and services, reduce capital spending on information technology projects by our customers and prospective customers, result in longer sales cycles for our software and services or cause customers or prospective customers to be no assurance that we can obtainmore cautious in undertaking larger transactions. Those situations may cause an additional financingdecrease in our revenue. A decrease in demand for our software and if we do obtain financing thatservices caused, in part, by an actual or anticipated weakening of the economy, may result in a decrease in our revenue rates.

The so-called “penny stock rule” could make it will becumbersome for brokers and dealers to trade in our common stock, making the market for our common stock less liquid which could cause the price of our stock to decline.

We were delisted from the NASDAQ SmallCap market effective January 23, 2003. Our common stock presently is quoted on terms that are favorable to us or our stockholders. THE SO-CALLED "PENNY STOCK RULE" COULD MAKE IT CUMBERSOME FOR BROKERS AND DEALERS TO TRADE IN OUR COMMON STOCK, MAKING THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK LESS LIQUID WHICH COULD CAUSE THE PRICE OF OUR STOCK TO DECLINE. the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.

Trading of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin BoardOTCBB may be subject to certain provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, commonly referred to as the "penny stock" rule. A penny stock is generally defined to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. If our stock is deemed to be a penny stock, trading in our stock will be subject to additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers. These may require a broker-dealer to: o make a special suitability determination for purchasers of our shares; o receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase; and o deliver to a prospective purchaser of our stock, prior to the first transaction, a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock market.

·make a special suitability determination for purchasers of our shares;

4


·receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase; and

·deliver to a prospective purchaser of our stock, prior to the first transaction, a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock market.

Consequently, penny stock rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to trade and/or maintain a market in our common stock. Also, prospective investors may not want to get involved with the additional administrative requirements, which may have a material adverse effect on the trading of our shares. FUNDS FROM OUR SERIES D PREFERRED STOCK FINANCING REMAIN IN ESCROW AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO THE COMPANY. In March 2003,

Because we closedcannot accurately predict the saleamount and timing of Series D Preferred Stock and warrants. Pursuant to the terms of the financing transaction, $2 million of the $3.5 million proceeds of the financing were placed in escrow. $775,900 of these proceeds remains in escrow. If we are unable to finalize arrangements for an Asian joint venture with the lead investors, the lead investors have the right to cause us to purchase $1 million of the Series D Preferred Stock with the funds that were placed in escrow and to the extent the escrow is insufficient, the Company would need to finance the rest of the repurchase right to the lead investor. BECAUSE WE CANNOT ACCURATELY PREDICT THE AMOUNT AND TIMING OF INDIVIDUAL SALES, OUR QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS MAY VARY SIGNIFICANTLY, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR STOCK PRICE. individual sales, our quarterly operating results may vary significantly, which could adversely impact our stock price.
Our quarterly operating results have varied significantly in the past, and we expect they will continue to do so in the future. We have derived, and expect to continue to derive in the near term, a significant portion of our revenue from relatively large customer contracts or arrangements. The timing of revenue recognition from those contracts and arrangements has caused and may continue to cause fluctuations in our operating results, particularly on a quarterly basis. Our quarterly revenues and operating results typically depend upon the volume and timing of customer contracts received during a given quarter and the percentage of each contract, which we are able to recognize as revenue during the quarter. Each of these factors is difficult to forecast. As is common in the software industry, the largest portion of software license revenues are typically recognized in the last month of each fiscal quarter and the third and fourth quarters of each fiscal year. We believe these patterns are partly attributable to budgeting and purchasing cycles of our customers and our sales commission policies, which compensate sales personnel for meeting or exceeding periodic quotas. 4

Furthermore, individual CiceroCicero® sales are large and each sale can or will account for a large percentage of our revenue and a single sale may have a significant impact on the results of a quarter. The sales of both our historical products and CiceroCicero® can be classified as generally large in size to a small discrete number of customers. Typically, the purchase of our products involves a significant technical evaluation by the customer and the delays frequently associated with customers’ internal procedures to approve large capital expenditures and to test, implement and accept new technologies that affect key operations. In addition, the substantial commitment of executive time and financial resources that have historically been required in connection with a customer'scustomer’s decision to purchase CiceroCicero® and our historical products increases the risk of quarter-to-quarter fluctuations. CiceroCicero® sales require a significant commitment of time and financial resources because it is an enterprise product. Typically, the purchase of our products involves a significant technical evaluation by the customer and the delays frequently associated with customers' internal procedures to approve large capital expenditures and to test, implement and accept new technologies that affect key operations. This evaluation process frequently results in a lengthy sales process of several months. It also subjects the sales cycle for our products to a number of significant risks, including our customers'customers’ budgetary constraints and internal acceptance reviews. The length of our sales cycle may vary substantially from customer to customer. We typically do not have any material backlog of unfilled software orders, and product revenue may fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to the completion or commencement of significant assignments, the number of working days in a quarter and the utilization rate of services personnel. As a result of these factors, we believe that a period-to-period comparison of our historical results of operations is not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.

In particular, our revenues in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal years may not be indicative of the revenues for the first and second quarters. Moreover, if our quarterly results do not meet the expectations of our securities analysts and investors, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline. LOSS OF KEY PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH CICERO DEVELOPMENT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.

Loss of key personnel associated with Cicero® development could adversely affect our business.

Loss of key executive personnel or the software engineers we have hired with specialized knowledge of the CiceroCicero® technology could have a significant impact on our execution of our new strategy givegiven that they have specialized knowledge developed over a long period of time with respect to the CiceroCicero® technology. Furthermore, because of our restructuring and reduction in the number of employees, we may find it difficult to recruit new employees in the future. DIFFERENT COMPETITIVE APPROACHES OR INTERNALLY DEVELOPED SOLUTIONS TO THE SAME BUSINESS PROBLEM COULD DELAY OR PREVENT ADOPTION OF CICERO.

Different competitive approaches or internally developed solutions to the same business problem could delay or prevent adoption of Cicero®.

Cicero® is designed to address in a novel way the problems that large companies face integrating the functionality of different software applications by integrating these applications at the desktop. To effectively penetrate the market for solutions to this disparate application problem, CiceroCicero® will compete with traditional Enterprise Application Integration, or EAI, solutions that attempt to solve this business problem at the server or back-office level. Server level EAI solutions are currently sold and marketed by companies such as NEON, Mercator, Vitria, and BEA. There can be no assurance that our potential customers will determine that Cicero'sCicero®’s desktop integration methodology is superior to traditional middleware EAI solutions provided by theour competitors described above in addressing this business problem. Moreover,

5


the information systems departments of our target customers, large financial institutions, are large and may elect to attempt to internally develop an internal solution to this business problem rather than to purchase the CiceroCicero® product. CiceroCicero® itself was originally developed internally by Merrill Lynch to solve these integration needs.

Accordingly, we may not be able to provide products and services that compare favorably with the products and services of our competitors or the internally developed solutions of our customers. These competitive pressures could delay or prevent adoption of CiceroCicero® or require us to reduce the price of our products, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. WE MAY BE UNABLE TO ENFORCE OR DEFEND OUR OWNERSHIP AND USE OF PROPRIETARY AND LICENSED TECHNOLOGY.

Our ability to compete may be subject to factors outside our control.

We believe that our ability to compete depends in part on a number of competitive factors outside our control, including the ability of our competitors to hire, retain and motivate senior project managers, the ownership by competitors of software used by potential clients, the development by others of software that is competitive with our products and services, the price at which others offer comparable services and the extent of our competitors’ responsiveness to customer needs.
The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions.

Our future success will depend to a substantial degree upon our ability to enhance our existing products and to develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products and features that meet changing customer requirements and emerging and evolving industry standards.

The introduction of new or enhanced products also requires us to manage the transition from older products in order to minimize disruption in customer ordering patterns, as well as ensure that adequate supplies of new products can be delivered to meet customer demand. There can be no assurance that we will successfully develop, introduce or manage the transition to new products.

We have in the past, and may in the future, experience delays in the introduction of our products, due to factors internal and external to our business. Any future delays in the introduction or shipment of new or enhanced products, the inability of such products to gain market acceptance or problems associated with new product transitions could adversely affect our results of operations, particularly on a quarterly basis.

We may face damage to the reputation of our software and a loss of revenue if our software products fail to perform as intended or contain significant defects.

Our software products are complex, and significant defects may be found following introduction of new software or enhancements to existing software or in product implementations in varied information technology environments. Internal quality assurance testing and customer testing may reveal product performance issues or desirable feature enhancements that could lead us to reallocate product development resources or postpone the release of new versions of our software. The reallocation of resources or any postponement could cause delays in the development and release of future enhancements to our currently available software, require significant additional professional services work to address operational issues, damage the reputation of our software in the marketplace and result in potential loss of revenue. Although we attempt to resolve all errors that we believe would be considered serious by our customers, our software is not error-free. Undetected errors or performance problems may be discovered in the future, and known errors that we consider minor may be considered serious by our customers. This could result in lost revenue, delays in customer deployment or legal claims and would be detrimental to our reputation. If our software experiences performance problems or ceases to demonstrate technology leadership, we may have to increase our product development costs and divert our product development resources to address the problems.

We may be unable to enforce or defend our ownership and use of proprietary and licensed technology.

We originally licensed the Cicero® technology and related patents on a worldwide basis from Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated in August of 2000 under a license agreement containing standard provisions and a two-year exclusivity period. Consideration for the original Cicero® license consisted of 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. On January 3, 2002, the license agreement was amended to extend our exclusive worldwide marketing, sales and development rights to Cicero® in perpetuity (subject to Merrill Lynch's rights to terminate in the event of bankruptcy or

6


a change in control of the Company) and to grant us ownership rights in the Cicero® trademark. Merrill Lynch indemnifies us with regard to the rights granted to us by them. In exchange for the amendment, we granted an additional 250,000 shares of common stock to MLBC, Inc., a Merrill Lynch affiliate, and entered into a royalty sharing agreement. Under the royalty sharing agreement, we pay a royalty of 3% of the sales price for each sale of Cicero® or related maintenance services. The royalties over the life of the agreement are not payable in excess of $20 million.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon our proprietary and licensed technology. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright law, contractual restrictions and passwords to protect our proprietary technology. However, these measures provide only limited protection, and there is no guarantee that our protection of our proprietary rights will be adequate. Furthermore, the laws of some jurisdictions outside the United States do not protect proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. In addition, our competitors may independently develop similar technology; duplicate our products or design around our patents or our other intellectual property rights. We may not be able to detect or police the unauthorized use of our products or technology, and litigation may be required in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights. Additionally, with respect to the CiceroCicero® line of products, there can be no assurance that Merrill Lynch will protect its patents or that we will have the resources to successfully pursue infringers. Any litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights would be expensive and time-consuming, would divert management resources and may not be adequate to protect our business. 5
We do not believe that any of our products infringe the proprietary rights of third parties. However, companies in the software industry have experienced substantial litigation regarding intellectual property and third parties could assert claims that we have infringed their intellectual property rights. In addition, we may be required to indemnify our distribution partners and end- usersend-users for similar claims made against them. Any claims against us would divert management resources, and could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation, pay damages, develop new intellectual property or acquire licenses to intellectual property that is the subject of the infringement claims. These licenses, if required, may not be available on acceptable terms. As a result, intellectual property claims against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. WE HAVE NOT PAID ANY DIVIDENDS ON OUR COMMON STOCK AND IT IS LIKELY THAT NO DIVIDENDS WILL BE PAID IN THE FUTURE.
Our business may be adversely impacted if we do not provide professional services to implement our solutions.

Customers that license our software typically engage our professional services staff or third-party consultants to assist with product implementation, training and other professional consulting services. We believe that many of our software sales depend, in part, on our ability to provide our customers with these services and to attract and educate third-party consultants to provide similar services. New professional services personnel and service providers require training and education and take time and significant resources to reach full productivity. Competition for qualified personnel and service providers is intense within our industry. Our business may be harmed if we are unable to provide professional services to our customers to effectively implement our solutions of if we are unable to establish and maintain relationships with third-party implementation providers.

Because our software could interfere with the operations of customers, we may be subject to potential product liability and warranty claims by these customers.

Our software enables customers’ software applications to integrate and is often used for mission critical functions or applications. Errors, defects or other performance problems in our software or failure to provide technical support could result in financial or other damages to our customers. Customers could seek damages for losses from us. In addition, the failure of our software and solutions to perform to customers’ expectations could give rise to warranty claims. The integration of our software with our customer’s applications increase the risk that a customer may bring a lawsuit against us. Even if our software is not at fault, a product liability claim brought against us, even if not successful, could be time consuming and costly to defend and could harm our reputation.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and it is likely that no cash dividends will be paid in the future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. PROVISIONS OF OUR CHARTER AND BYLAWS AND DELAWARE LAW COULD DETER TAKEOVER ATTEMPTS.

7


Provisions of our charter and Bylaws and Delaware law could deter takeover attempts.

Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which prohibits certain persons from engaging incontains restrictions on mergers and other business combinations with Level 8,between us and any holder of 15% of our common stock, may have anti-takeover effects and may delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt that a stockholder may consider to be in the holder'sholder’s best interests. These provisions of Delaware law also may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance, without stockholder approval, of preferred stock, with such designations, rights and preferences as the board of directors may determine preferences as from time to time. Such designations, rights and preferences established by the board may adversely affect our stockholders. In the event of issuance, the preferred stock could be used, under certain circumstances, as a means of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change of control of Level 8.the Company. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of preferred stock in addition to the currently outstanding preferred stock, we may issue preferred stock in the future. OUR STOCKHOLDERS MAY BE DILUTED BY THE EXERCISE OF OPTIONS AND WARRANTS AND CONVERSION OF PREFERRED STOCK OR BY THE REGISTRATION OF ADDITIONAL SECURITIES FOR RESALE. We have reserved 10,900,000 shares of common stock for issuance under our employee incentive plans and 120,000 shares under our outside director incentive plan. As of March 31, 2004, options to purchase an aggregate of 7,650,870 shares of common stock were outstanding pursuant to our employee and director incentive plans. As of March 31, 2004, warrants to purchase an additional 19,046,879 shares of common stock are outstanding. We have also reserved 188,528 shares of common stock for issuance upon conversion of the outstanding Series A3 Preferred Stock, 2,394,063 shares of common stock for issuance upon conversion of the outstanding Series B3 Preferred Stock, 3,068,421 shares of common stock for issuance upon conversion of the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock, and 8,411,125, shares of common stock for issuance upon the conversion of the outstanding Series D Preferred Stock. The exercise of such options and warrants or conversion of preferred stock and the subsequent sale of the underlying common stock in the public market could adversely cause the market price of our common stock to decline. 6
USE OF PROCEEDS PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders in this offering but willmay receive proceeds from the exercise of warrants held by certain of the selling stockholders. We expect to use any proceeds we receive for working capital and for other general corporate purposes, including research and product development.
PRICE RANGE OF OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock washad been traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "LVEL"''LVEL” from 1996 until December 23, 2002. From December 24, 2002, until January 23, 2003, our common stock traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. As of January 24,23, 2003, our common stock was delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market and is currently quoted on the OTCover-the-counter bulletin board. In January 2007 we formally changed our name to Cicero Inc and now trade under the ticker CICN. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin Board. TheTopic 4(c), the chart below sets forth the high and low stock prices for the quarters of 2004 and for the quarters of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 20022006 and 2001. 2004 2003 2002 2001 QUARTER High Low High Low High Low High Low First .... $0.45 $0.35 $0.40 $0.15 $3.19 $1.26 $6.38 $2.39 Second ... N/A N/A $0.35 $0.24 $1.70 $0.34 $3.25 $2.75 Third .... N/A N/A $0.77 $0.24 $0.71 $0.25 $4.99 $1.45 Fourth ... N/A N/A $0.48 $0.28 $0.56 $0.17 $3.10 $1.20 2005 as retroactively adjusted for the 100:1 reverse stock split.

  
2006
 
2005
 
Quarter
 
High
 
Low
 
High
 
Low
 
First $3.00 $1.80 $16.00 $7.00 
Second $2.50 $1.00 $9.00 $4.00 
Third $2.10 $1.10 $5.00 $2.00 
Fourth $4.50 $1.30 $5.00 $1.00 
              
   
2007 
       
Quarter
  
High
 
 
Low
       
First $2.52 $1.11       

The closing price of the common stock on May 10, 2004April 16, 2007 was $0.29$1.11 per share. As of May 10, 2004,April 13, 2007 we had 232228 registered shareholders of record.
DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We anticipate that all of our earnings will be retained for the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends for common stock in the foreseeable future. 7

8


SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

Our shares of common stock to which this prospectus relates are being registered for resale by the selling stockholders. The following shows the name and number of shares of our common stock owned by the selling stockholders who may sell shares covered by this Prospectus.

The selling stockholders may resell all, a portion or none of such shares of common stock from time to time. The table below sets forth, as of the date of this prospectus, with respect to each selling stockholder, based upon information made available to us as of May 10, 2004,by each selling stockholder, the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned, the number of shares of common stock registered by this prospectus and the number and percent of outstanding common stock that will be owned after the sale of the registered shares of common stock assuming the sale of all of the registered shares of common stock under this prospectus and all other currently effective prospectuses. Because the selling stockholders may offer all, some or none of their respective shares of common stock, no definitive estimate as to the number of shares thereof that will be held by the selling stockholders after such offering can be provided.
 
Number of Shares of
  
 
Common Stock
  
Name
Owned (1)
  
    
Landis, Mark & Carolyn P.5,143,613 (2)
    
QueeQueg Partners, L.P.(a)4,732,333 (3)
    
Steffens, Launny3,310,429 (4)
    
Kroll, Jules1,586,237 (5)
    
Paneyko, Steve1,557,159 (6)
    
Queequeg, Ltd.(a)1,504,938 (7)
    
Pizi, Anthony1,401,241 (8)
    
Ahab International, Ltd.(a)1,120,000 (9)
    
Briggs, Jason1,085,922 (10)
    
Percelay, Bruce1,032,786 (11)
    
Mack, Fredric1,018,194 (12)
    
Dugdale, Glen & Joan1,017,395 (13)
    
Miller, Bruce973,257 (14)
    
Lucas, Scott939,034 (15)
    
Ahab Partners, LP (a)880,000 (16)
    
Wagenhals, Fred802,593 (17)
    
Casey, Kenneth778,464 (18)
    
Lustgarten, Scott682,193 (19)
    
Keates, Richard M.D.558,988 (20)

9

 
Number of Shares of
  
 
Common Stock
  
Name
Owned (1)
  
    
Clement, Conrad513,145 (21)
    
Delphi Partners Limited (b)512,781 (22)
    
Stevens, Jim456,699 (23)
    
The Landis Group (c )402,134 (24)
    
The Sorgen Group (d)376,221 (25)
    
Liraz Systems (e)363,278 (26)
    
Nager , Richard344,679 (27)
    
Dugdale, William C.333,210 (28)
    
Lustgarten, Martin estate of (f)293,155 (29)
    
Dugdale, CJ & JO CRT 1/17/96 (g)265,870 (30)
    
Weitzman, Hervey249,933 (31)
    
Dugdale, Glen B/D Trust FBO (h)249,160 (32)
    
Sutro, Marina230,842 (33)
    
Leavitt, Philip227,300 (34)
    
Turner, William & Barbara224,977 (35)
    
Miller, Jeanne211,388 (36)
    
Nielsen, Kenneth201,294 (37)
    
North Sound Legacy International Ltd.(i)162,821 (38)
    
Grodko, Steven162,187 (39)
    
Wittenbach, Roger160,243 (40)
    
Mack, Earle154,248 (41)
    
Atherton, John W. Jr.148,784 (42)
    
Danko, Brett141,625 (43)
    
Spain, Bernard141,099 (44)
    
Dweck, Ike140,040 (45)
    
Howard, Joan136,640 (46)

10

 
Number of Shares of
  
 
Common Stock
  
Name
Owned (1)
  
    
Corwin, Leonard120,275 (47)
    
Advanced Systems Europe, BV (j)118,096 (48)
    
North Sound Legacy Institutnl. Fund LLC (i)112,592 (49)
    
Bank, Marvin111,522 (50)
    
Robinson, Jonathon105,382 (51)
    
Spivak, David101,914 (52)
    
Fields, John100,499 (53)
    
Harwood, Chris100,474 (54)
    
Wills, Maurice100,000 (55)
    
Koitz, Martin96,943 (56)
    
Weitzman, Hannah95,279 (57)
    
Blanck, Richard95,251 (58)
    
Haines Family Assoc LP (k)93,101 (59)
    
Emerson, Alice81,527 (60)
    
Morelli, Luciano80,534 (61)
    
Miller, William R. FBO ROTH IRA (l)80,415 (62)
    
Zinnert, William C. III80,349 (63)
    
Signorino, Salvadore80,326 (64)
    
Porciello, Charles80,286 (65)
    
Baena, Douglas67,842 (66)
    
Miller, Douglas & Anita E.64,294 (67)
    
Thinkcentric (m)60,829 (68)
    
Cohen, Jeffrey C.50,335 (69)
    
Lemery-Greisler, LLC (n)50,000 (70)
    
Cothren, Tony49,523 (71)
    
Lerner, Arthur48,952 (72)
    
Dugdale, William K46,355 (73)

11

 
Number of Shares of
  
 
Common Stock
  
Name
Owned (1)
  
    
CGA Resources, LLC (o)45,527 (74)
    
Lobada, Anna43,365 (75)
    
McNamara, William E.41,320 (76)
    
Mack, Fred Trust (Hailey Mack) (p)40,874 (77)
    
Mack, Fred Trust (Jason Mack)(p)40,874 (77)
    
Lorenzo, Val40,227 (78)
    
Brooker, James40,207 (79)
    
Sutro, Peter40,192 (80)
    
Amchris Consulting Group ,LLC (q)40,163 (81)
    
Mikroulis, Loula40,153 (82)
    
Hathaway, Devon D.39,798 (83)
    
Forman, Murray38,923 (84)
    
Ganarche, James37,621 (85)
    
Grodko, Sandra36,145 (86)
    
Perl, Jeffrey34,967 (87)
    
Levine, Robert A.34,247 (88)
    
Hasenyager, Bruce32,652 (89)
    
Seneca Capital, International (r)32,248 (90)
    
Davis, Bob28,675 (91)
    
Dalal, Pratik28,291 (92)
    
Schneider, Steven27,803 (93)
    
Seneca Capital, L.P (r)25,798 (94)
    
The Rittenhouse Group (s)24,793 (95)
    
Harwood, Brian24,105 (96)
    
Kaliroff, Joseph20,845 (97)
    
Tesker, Ron20,089 (98)
    
Shelanski, Joseph19,489 (99)

12

 
Number of Shares of
  
 
Common Stock
  
Name
Owned (1)
  
    
Critical Mass Mail (s)18,243 (100)
    
Hatalski, Nick17,018 (101)
    
Leppo, Robert D.16,985 (102)
    
Mistretta, Joseph16,076 (103)
    
Weitzman, Elizabeth16,066 (104)
    
Broderick, John3,248 (105)
    
Chugh, Narinder15,555 (106)
    
Schwartz, Andrew Living Trust (t)14,138 (107)
    
Ryan, Dennis14,125 (108)
    
Weitzman, Hervey Trustee Blackrock (u)14,118 (109)
    
Koch, June14,090 (110)
    
Seidle, Jay13,699 (111)
    
Haines, Roger13,440 (112)
    
Nappi, Joe13,434 (113)
    
Dugdale, Priscilla13,422 (114)
    
Siracusa, Richard12,363 (115)
    
Hillman, Brett12,054 (116)
    
Mack, Fredric 4-30-92 Trust (p)11,499 (117)
    
Grunstein, Leonard10,741 (118)
    
Weiss, Michael9,435 (119)
    
Leavitt, David8,831 (120)
    
Leavitt, Diane R.8,831 (120)
    
Forman, Irving8,650 (121)
    
Spivak, Bradford8,048 (122)
    
Spivak, Daniel8,048 (122)
    
Spivak, Jonathon8,048 (122)
    
Loebell, David K & Gina W7,630 (123)

13

 
Number of Shares of
  
 
Common Stock
  
Name
Owned (1)
  
    
Diamond Investments II, LLC(v )7,372 (124)
    
Phillips Giraud Naud ET Associes (w)7,084 (125)
    
Bell, Joseph D. Jr.7,061 (126)
    
Puggi, James A.6,810 (127)
    
Calandra, Joseph A.6,712 (128)
    
Grodko, Jeffrey6,712 (128)
    
Shah, Natwar6,521 (129)
    
Babcock, Clint5,649 (130)
    
Freeman, Don5,628 (131)
    
Betanov, Cemil5,508 (132)
    
Simkovitz, Phillip5,437 (133)
    
Brower, Lee5,375 (134)
    
Rutstein, Larry5,371 (135)
    
Friedman, Mark5,034 (136)
    
Zelman, Roselyn4,894 (137)
    
Martino, Ralph4,666 (138)
    
DeFranco, Joseph4,466 (139)
    
Gable, Sidney4,324 (140)
    
Whelden, Larry4,232 (141)
    
Hillman, Todd4,018 (142)
    
Pena, Roland3,813 (143)
    
Feder, Mark3,656 (144)
    
Krubiner, Paul & Marjorie3,481 (145)
    
Falik, Harold3,357 (146)
    
Orlofsky, Martin Family Trust3,356 (147)
    
Wenig, Hal3,356 (147)
    
Vegh, Robert3,326 (148)

14

 
Number of Shares of
  
 
Common Stock
  
Name
Owned (1)
  
    
Weiss, Joseph675 (149)
    
Sobol, Tziporah2,684 (150)
    
Vertical Ventures (x)2,475 (151)
    
Simpson, James2,145 (152)
    
Wolfe, Jack2,120 (153)
    
Campbell, James V.2,119 (154)
    
Roberts, John & Patricia2,114 (155)
    
Whyte, Jacqueline2,063 (156)
    
Grodko, Philip2,013 (157)
    
Wilkins, James1,789 (158)
    
Blisko, Larry1,745 (159)
    
Tamberelli, Frank1,730 (160)
    
Mack, Earl I Charitable Trust (y)1,666 (161)
    
Orlofsky, Gary1,611 (162)
    
Landis, Deborah1,579 (163)
    
Landis, Jennifer1,579 (163)
    
Landis, Jonathon1,579 (163)
    
Berger, Jerald & Sara1,342 (164)
    
Ditchek, Stuart1,342 (164)
    
Friedman, Aaron1,342 (164)
    
Garb, Eugene1,342 (164)
    
Gertz, Anna1,342 (164)
    
Husarsky, Leona1,342 (164)
    
Huszcza, Joseph1,342 (164)
    
Katz, David1,342 (164)
    
Orlofsky, Bruce1,342 (164)
    
Polin, Milton1,342 (164)
15

 
Number of Shares of
  
 
Common Stock
  
Name
Owned (1)
  
    
Popack, Israel M.1,342 (164)
    
Schwartz, Kenneth1,342 (164)
    
Waintraub, Stanley1,342 (164)
    
Gonosky, William1,341 (165)
    
Urbanski, Patty1,229 (166)
    
Landis, Meredith1,079 (167)
    
PyxisLink (z)1,000 (168)
    
Tsougarakis, Eva550 (169)
    
Gordon, Allan H. Esquire337 (170)
    
Kushner, Ron337 (170)
    
Littman, Leslie337 (170)
    
Rothbard, Norman337 (170)
    
Lemery, Joan B.337 (170)
    
SDS (aa)93 (171)
Total
40,641,978  

Number
(a)Jonathan Gallen is an investment adviser for, and exercises sole voting and investment authority with respect to the securities held by, each of Shares(i) Ahab Partners, L.P., (ii) Ahab International, Ltd., (iii) Queequeg Partners, L.P. and (iv) Queequeg, Ltd.

(b)Bruce Miller, general partner of NumberDelphi Partners, Ltd., exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Delphi Partners, Ltd.

(c)Alan Landis, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by The Landis Group.

(d)Howard Sorgen, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by The Sorgen Group.

(e)Iris Yahal, representative of Shares NumberLiraz Systems, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Liraz Systems.

(f)Richard Nager, trustee of Shares Common Stock To BeEstate of Common StockMartin Lustgarten exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Estate of Common Stock Which Owned After Offering Name Owned (1) May Be Offered (1) Number Percent ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- Brown Simpson 5,936,921 5,936,921 (2) -- --Martin Lustgarten.

(g)Matthew Yaakovian exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by C. Glen and Joan O. Dugdale CRT.

16


(h)Glen Dugdale, trustee of BD Trust, FBO C. Glen Dugdale exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by BD Trust FBO C. Glen Dugdale.

(i)Thomas McAuley, Chief Investment Officer of North Sound Legacy, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by North Sound Legacy.

(j)Adee Shafran, representative of Advanced Systems Europe, BV, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Advanced Systems Europe, BV.

(k)John Haines, representative of Haines Family Associates, LP, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Haines Family Associates, LP.

(l)Sterne Agee and Leach Inc. Custodian, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by William R. Miller, ROTH IRA.

(m)John Haines, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Thinkcentric LLC.

(n)John Lemery, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Lemery Greisler.

(o)Jason Edelman, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by CGA Resources.

(p)Fred Mack, trustee of 4-30-92 Trust, Fred Mack Trust - Hailey Mack, and Fred Mack Trust - Jason Mack, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by 4-30-92 Trust, Fred Mack Trust - Hailey Mack, and Fred Mack Trust - Jason Mack.

(q)Christine Sweet, owner of Amchris Consulting Group, LLC exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Amchris Consulting Group, LLC.

(r)Doug Hirsch, general partner of Seneca, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Seneca.

(s)Joseph H. Weiss, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by the Rittenhouse Group and Critical Mass Mail.

(t)Andrew P. Schwartz exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Andrew P. Schwartz Revocable Living Trust.

(u)Hervey Weitzmen, Trustee of the Blackrock Turnpike Medical Group, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Blackrock Turnpike Medical Group.

(v)Robert P. Williams, III Chief Executive Officer of Diamond Investments II, LLC, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Diamond Investments II, LLC.

(w)Marc Giruad exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Phillips Giraud Naud ET Associes.

(x)Joshua Silverman, representative of Vertical Ventures Investments, LLC, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Vertical Ventures Investments, LLC.

(y)Earle I. Mack, registered agent for Earle I Mack Charitable Trust A, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Earle I Mack Charitable Trust A.

(z)Robin Pearce, representative of Pyxis Link Corp, exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Pyxis Link Corp.

17


(aa)Steve Derby, General Counsel of SDS Merchant Fund, LP, 4,869,659 4,869,659 exercises sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by SDS Merchant Fund, LP.


(1)The number of shares of common stock owned by each selling stockholder includes the aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be obtained by each stockholder upon conversion of all of the Series A1 Preferred Stock owned by the stockholder. It also includes the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be obtained upon exercise of warrants to purchase common stock owned by such stockholder. The number of shares, if any, beneficially owned by each selling stockholder after each sale will vary depending upon the terms of the number of such shares sold.

(2)Includes 1,326,136 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 69,322 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 18,750 warrants is $8 per share of common stock. The exercise price of 50,572 warrants is $10 per share of common stock. Also includes 3,748,155 shares of common stock. Mr. Landis is the Company’s Chairman of the Board.

(3) -- -- Queequeg Partners, L.P. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 9,643 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 12,761 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 9,318 warrants is $10 per share, the exercise price of 249 warrants is $38 per share, and the exercise price of 3,194 warrants is $40 per share. Also includes 4,709,929 shares of common stock.

(4)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 14,832 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 19,628 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 14,332 warrants is $10 per share, the exercise price of 384 warrants is $38 per share, and the exercise price of 4,912 warrants is $40 per share. Also includes 3,275,969 shares of common stock.

(5)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,586,237 shares of common stock.

(6)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,557,159 shares of common stock.

(7)Queequeg Limited owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 5,193 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 6,872 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 5,018 warrants is $10 per share, the exercise price of 134 warrants is $38 per share, and the exercise price of 1,720 warrants is $40 per share. Also includes 1,492,873 shares of common stock.

(8)Includes 111,016 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 15,274 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 11,667 shares is $10 per share of common stock, 901 shares is $17 per share of common stock, and 2,706 shares exercisable at $20 per share of common stock. Also includes 1,274,951 shares of common stock. Mr. Pizi is the Chief Intelligence officer of the Company. Mr. Pizi also holds 15,000 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of this prospectus, which shares are not being registered for resale by means of this prospectus. 

(9)Ahab International Ltd. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,120,000 shares of common stock.

(10)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,085,922 shares of common stock

(11)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,032,786 shares of common stock. Mr. Percelay is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

18


(12)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 60,688 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 12,658 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 944,848 shares of common stock.

(13)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 20,731 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 5,600 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 991,064 shares of common stock.

(14)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 49,418 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 15,844 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 13,195 warrants is $10 per share, the exercise price of 192 warrants is $38 per share, and the exercise price of 2,457 warrants is $40 per share. Also includes 907,995 shares of common stock. Mr. Miller is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

(15)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 939,034 shares of common stock.

(16)Ahab Partners, L.P. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 880,000 shares of common stock.

(17)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 802,593 shares of common stock.

(18)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 778,464 shares of common stock.

(19)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 329 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 680,864 shares of common stock.

(20)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 26,941 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 8,163 warrants is $7 per share, the exercise price of 16,796 warrants is $10 per share, and the exercise price of 1,982 warrants is $20 per share. Also includes 532,047 shares of common stock.

(21)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 513,145 shares of common stock.

(22)Delphi Partners, Ltd. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 18,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,514 shares of common stock issuabl upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 491,267 shares of common stock.

(23)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 6,031 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also owns 450,668 shares of common stock.

(24)The Landis Group owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 402,134 shares of common stock.

(25)The Sorgen Group owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 376,221 shares of common stock.

(26)Liraz Systems owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 40 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,645 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 361,593 shares of common stock.

19


(27)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 658 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 344,021 shares of common stock.

(28)Owns and ay offer from time to time under this prospectus 556 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 332,654 shares of common stock.

(29)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 4,224 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 288,931 shares of common stock.

(30)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 265,870 shares of common stock.

(31)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 278 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 249,655 shares of common stock.

(32)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 249,160 shares of common stock.

(33)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 230,842 shares of common stock.

(34)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 227,300 shares of common stock.

(35)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 400 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 224,577 shares of common stock.

(36)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 7,414 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 9,811 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 7,164 warrants is $10 per share, the exercise price of 192 warrants is $38 per share, and the exercise price of 2,455 warrants is $40 per share. Also includes 194,163 shares of common stock.

(37)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 201,294 shares of common stock.

(38)North Sound Legacy International, 3,274,378 3,274,378 (4) -- -- Ltd. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 17,488 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 4,999 warrants is $7 per share, the exercise price of 10,061 warrants is $10 per share, and the exercise price of 2,428 warrants is $20 per share. Also includes 145,333 shares of common stock.

(39)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 250 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 161,937 shares of common stock.

(40)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 160,243 shares of common stock.

(41)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 833 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 153,415 shares of common stock.

(42)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 148,784 shares of common stock. Mr. Atherton is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

(43)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 141,625 shares of common stock.

(44)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 141,099 shares of common stock.

(45)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,154 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 138,886 shares of common stock.

(46)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 136,640 shares of common stock.

20


(47)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 222 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 120,053 shares of common stock.

(48)Advanced Systems Europe, B.V. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 17,740 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 100,353 shares of common stock.

(49)North Sound Legacy Institutional 3,122,596 3,122,596 (5) -- -- Landis, Mark & Carolyn P 2,092,075 2,092,075 (6) -- --Fund, L.L.C. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 19,009 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 5,776 warrants is $7 per share, the exercise price of 10,661 warrants is $10 per share, and the exercise price of 2,572 warrants is $20 per share. Also includes 93,583 shares of common stock.

(50)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,623 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 107,899 shares of common stock.

(51)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 105,382 shares of common stock.

(52)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 101,914 shares of common stock.

(53)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 100,499 shares of common stock.

(54)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 100,474 shares of common stock.

(55)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 100,000 shares of common stock.

(56)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 96,943 shares of common stock.

(57)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 95,279 shares of common stock.

(58)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 95,251 shares of common stock.

(59)The Haines Family Associates, L.P. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,858 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 88,243 shares of common stock.

(60)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 81,527 shares of common stock.

(61)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 80,534 shares of common stock.

(62)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 80,415 shares of common stock.

(63)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 80,349 shares of common stock.

(64)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 80,326 shares of common stock.

(65)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 80,286 shares of common stock. Mr. Porciello is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

(66)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 67,842 shares of common stock.

(67)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 64,294 shares of common stock.

21


(68)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 60,829 shares of common stock.

(69)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 50,355 shares of common stock.

(70)Lemery Griesler, LLC owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 50,000 shares of common stock.

(71)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 6,969 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 2,133 warrants is $7 per share, the exercise price of 4,318 warrants is $10 per share, and the exercise price of 518 warrants is $20 per share. Also includes 42,554 shares of common stock.

(72)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 48,952 shares of common stock.

(73)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 46,355 shares of common stock.

(74)CGA Resources, LLC. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 45,527 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

(75)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 43,365 shares of common stock.

(76)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 41,320 shares of common stock.

(77)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 83 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 40,791 shares of common stock.

(78)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 40,227 shares of common stock.

(79)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 40,207 shares of common stock.

(80)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 40,192 shares of common stock.

(81)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 40,163 shares of common stock.

(82)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 40,153 shares of common stock.

(83)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 39,798 shares of common stock.

(84)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 7,250 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also includes 31,673 shares of common stock.

(85)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 37,621 shares of common stock.

(86)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Also includes 33,145 shares of common stock.

(87)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 34,967 shares of common stock.

(88)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 34,247 shares of common stock.

(89)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 32,652 shares of common stock. Mr. Hasenyager, who is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, also holds 1,000 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of this prospectus, which shares are not being registered for resale by means of this prospectus.

22


(90)Seneca Capital International owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 24,430 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also includes 7,818 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at $40 per share.

(91)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 28,675 shares of common stock.

(92)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 28,291 shares of common stock.

(93)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 27,803 shares of common stock.

(94)Seneca Capital L.P. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 17,556 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Includes 5,540 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at $40 per share. Also includes 2,702 shares of common stock.

(95)The Rittenhouse Group, aka Critical Mass Mail 2,027,027 2,027,027 (7) -- -- Seneca Capital LP 1,936,235 1,936,235 (8) -- -- Seneca Capital International, LTD 1,902,771 1,902,771 (9) -- -- Advanced Systems Europe, BV 1,481,561 1,481,561 (10) -- -- Mack, Fred 1,113,937 1,113,937 (11) -- -- Miller, Bruce 977,639 977,639 (12) -- -- Stevens, Jim 797,014 797,014 (13) -- -- Forman, Murray 772,796 772,796 (14) -- -- Dugdale, Glen & Joan 687,545 687,545 (15) -- -- Chalfin, Stuart 560,810 560,810 (16) -- -- Weiss, Joseph 560,810 560,810 (16) -- -- Spain, Bernard 540,540 540,540 (17) -- -- Pizi, Anthony 1,991,489 803,691 (18) 1,187,798 3.3% Shah, Natwar 460,526 460,526 (19) -- -- Clement, Conrad 430,270 430,270 (20) -- -- Haines Family Assoc LP 424,474 424,474 (21) -- -- Vertical International Limited 400,000 400,000 (22) -- -- Mack, Fredrick 4-30-92 Trust 387,576 387,576 (23) -- -- Bank, Marvin 364,940 364,940 (24) -- -- North Sound Legacy 346,951 346,951 (25) -- -- owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 24,793 shares of common stock.

(96)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 24,105 shares of common stock.

(97)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 20,845 shares of common stock.

(98)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 20,089 shares of common stock.

(99)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,500 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also includes 17,989 shares of common stock.

(100)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 18,243 shares of common stock

(101)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 10,938 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 781 warrants exercisable at $32 per share. Includes 5,299 shares of common stock.

(102)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 10,938 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 781 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $32 per share. Includes 5,266 shares of common stock.

(103)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 16,076 shares of common stock.

(104)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 16,066 shares of common stock.

(105)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,248 shares of common stock. Mr. Broderick, who is the Company’s Chief Executor Officer and Chief Financial Officer also holds 12,609 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of this prospectus, which shares are not being registered for resale by means of this prospectus.

(106)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 15,555 shares of common stock.

(107)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 14,138 shares of common stock.

(108)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 14,125 shares of common stock.

(109)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 14,118 shares of common stock.

(110)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 14,090 shares of common stock.

23


(111)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 13,699 shares of common stock.

(112)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 13,440 shares of common stock.

(113)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 13,434 shares of common stock.

(114)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 13,422 shares of common stock.

(115)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 12,363 shares of common stock.

(116)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 12,054 shares of common stock.

(117)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,250 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 800 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Includes 7,449 shares of common stock.

(118)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 10,741 shares of common stock.

(119)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,600 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 793 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $10 per share. Includes 7,042 shares of common stock.

(120)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 8,831 shares of common stock.

(121)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also includes 6,650 shares of common stock.

(122)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 8,048 shares of common stock.

(123)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 7,630 shares of common stock.

(124)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 7,372 shares of common stock.

(125)Phillips Giraud Naud ET Associes owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 7,084 shares of common stock.

(126)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 7,061 shares of common stock.

(127)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 4,375 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 313 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $32 per share. Includes 2,122 shares of common stock.

(128)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 6,712 shares of common stock.

(129)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 5,600 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 921 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable at $38 per share.

(130)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 5,649 shares of common stock.

(131)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 5,628 shares of common stock.

(132)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 5,508 shares of common stock.

24


(133)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 5,437 shares of common stock.

(134)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 5,375 shares of common stock.

(135)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 676 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $10 per share. Also owns 4,695 shares of common stock.

(136)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 676 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $10 per share. Also owns 4,358 shares of common stock.

(137)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 4,894 shares of common stock.

(138)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 4,666 shares of common stock.

(139)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 4,466 shares of common stock.

(140)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns 3,324 shares of common stock.

(141)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 4,232 shares of common stock.

(142)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 4,018 shares of common stock.

(143)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,813 shares of common stock.

(144)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 329 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $10 per share. Also owns 3,327 shares of common stock.

(145)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,481 shares of common stock.

(146)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,357 shares of common stock.

(147)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,356 shares of common stock.

(148)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 3,326 shares of common stock.

(149)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 675 shares of common stock.

(150)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,684 shares of common stock.

(151)Vertical Ventures Investments, LLC 340,557 340,557 (26) -- -- Delphi Partners Limited 309,367 309,367 (27) -- -- Grodko, Sandra 300,000 300,000 (28) -- -- Liraz Systems 234,869 234,869 (29) -- -- Weiss, Michael 211,579 211,579 (30) -- -- Mack, Earl 208,334 208,334 (31) -- -- Martino, Ralph 200,001 200,001 (32) -- -- Feldman, Michael 189,190 189,190 (33) -- -- Bank Hapoalim Warrants 172,751 172,751 (34) -- --
8
Numberowns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus, 2,475 shares of Sharescommon stock issuable upon exercise of Numberwarrants. The exercise price of Shares Number1,767 warrants is $7 per share and the exercise price of Shares Common Stock To Be708 warrants is $20 per share.

(152)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,145 shares of Common Stockcommon stock.

(153)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,120 shares of Common Stock Which Owned After Offering Name Owned (1) May Be Offered (1) Number Percent ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- Forman, Irving 164,474 164,474 (35) -- -- Nager, Richard 164,474 164,474 (35) -- -- Shelanski, Joseph 143,250 143,250 (36) -- -- Whelden, Larry 138,889 138,889 (37) -- -- Yaakovian, Matthew (Trustee) 138,889 138,889 (37) -- -- Leavitt, Philip 135,136 135,136 (38) -- -- Turner, William & Barbara 120,000 120,000 (39) -- -- Baena, Douglas 108,108 108,108 (40) -- -- Pyxis Link Corp 100,000 100,000 (41) -- -- Simkovitz, Phillip 84,324 84,324 (42) -- -- Simpson, James 83,334 83,334 (43) -- -- Gable, Sidney 82,236 82,236 (44) -- -- Lustgarden, Scott 82,236 82,236 (44) -- -- Vegh, Robert 82,236 82,236 (44) -- -- Freeman, Don 81,082 81,082 (45) -- -- Diamond Investments II, LLC 80,000 80,000 (46) -- -- Keates, Richard M.D 80,000 80,000 (46) -- -- Emerson, Alice 69,445 69,445 (47) -- -- Robinson, John 69,445 69,445 (47) -- -- Weitzman, Hervey 69,445 69,445 (47) -- -- Wilkins, James 69,445 69,445 (47) -- -- Wittenbach, Roger 69,445 69,445 (47) -- -- Friedman, Mark 67,568 67,568 (48) -- -- Gordon, Allan 67,568 67,568 (48) -- -- Kushner, Ron 67,568 67,568 (48) -- -- Littman, Leslie 67,568 67,568 (48) -- -- Rothbard, Melvyn 67,568 67,568 (48) -- -- Rothbard, Norman 67,568 67,568 (48) -- -- Rutstein, Larry 67,568 67,568 (48) -- -- Dweck, Ike 57,697 57,697 (49) -- -- Corwin, Leonard 55,555 55,555 (50) -- -- Spivak, Virginia 55,555 55,555 (50) -- -- Blank, Richard 54,054 54,054 (51) -- -- Chugh, Narinder 54,054 54,054 (51) -- -- Krubiner, Paul & Marjorie 54,054 54,054 (51) -- -- Schneider, Steven 54,054 54,054 (51) -- -- Cleveland Overseas Ltd 53,333 53,333 (52) -- -- Lemery, John 41,666 41,666 (53) -- -- Wolfe, Jack 41,666 41,666 (53) -- -- Brooks, Marshall 37,838 37,838 (54) -- -- Tamberelli, Frank 32,895 32,895 (55) -- -- Whyte, Jacqueline 29,728 29,728 (56) -- -- Lerner, Arthur 27,028 27,028 (57) -- -- Mack, Fred Trust (Hailey Mack) 20,834 20,834 (58) -- -- Mack, Fred Trust (Jason Mack) 20,834 20,834 (58) -- -- Feder, Mark 16,447 16,447 (59) -- -- Grodko, Steven 12,500 12,500 (60) -- -- Kanevsky, Paul 100,000 100,000 -- -- DeFranco, Joseph 30,000 30,000 -- -- Seidle, Jay 30,000 30,000 -- -- Sandor, Patty 10,000 10,000 -- -- Totals 43,205,849 42,018,051 common stock.
9 - -------- (1) The number of shares of common stock owned by each selling stockholder includes the aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be obtained by each stockholder upon conversion of all of the Series A3 Preferred Stock, Series B3 Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and/or Series D Preferred Stock owned by the stockholder. It also includes the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be obtained upon exercise of warrants to purchase common stock owned by such stockholder. The shares offered by this prospectus may be sold by the selling stockholder from time to time. The number of shares, if any, offered by each selling stockholder and the corresponding number of shares beneficially owned by each selling stockholder after each sale will vary depending upon the terms of the individual sales. (2) Brown Simpson Partners I, Ltd. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,197,031 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series B3 Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 460,526 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 4,009,093 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 115,132 warrants is $0.38 per share of common stock. The exercise price of 270,270 warrants is $0.37 per share of common stock. The exercise price of 3,623,691 warrants is $0.40 per share of common stock. Also includes 270,270 shares of common stock. Brown Simpson Partners I, Ltd. is not currently the beneficial owner of all of such shares of common stock. (3) SDS Merchant Fund, L.P. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,848,625 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,625,362 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 457,813 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. The holders may not exercise the warrants into shares of our common stock or convert shares of Series D Preferred Stock, if after the exercise or conversion, such holder, together with any of its affiliates, would beneficially own over 4.99% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. This restriction may not be altered, amended, deleted or changed in any manner without the written approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and, in the case of the Series D Preferred Stock, also the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock, and in the case of any Series D-1 Warrant or Series D-2 Warrant, also the holder of such warrant. However, the 4.99% limitation would not prevent the holders from acquiring and selling in excess of 4.99% of our common stock through a series of exercises and conversions. Also includes 967,500 shares of common stock. (4) North Sound Legacy International Fund Ltd. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,359,375 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 889,484 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 113,501 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. The holders may not exercise the warrants into shares of our common stock or convert shares of Series D Preferred Stock, if after the exercise or conversion, such holder, together with any of its affiliates, would beneficially own over 4.99% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. This restriction may not be altered, amended, deleted or changed in any manner without the written approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and, in the case of the Series D Preferred Stock, also the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock, and in the case of any Series D-1 Warrant or Series D-2 Warrant, also the holder of such warrant. However, the 4.99% limitation would not prevent the holders from acquiring and selling in excess of 4.99% of our common stock through a series of exercises and conversions. Also includes 411,940 shares of common stock. 10 (5) North Sound Legacy Institutional Fund LLC owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 848,250 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 108,239 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. The holders may not exercise the warrants into shares of our common stock or convert shares of Series D Preferred Stock, if after the exercise or conversion, such holder, together with any of its affiliates, would beneficially own over 4.99% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. This restriction may not be altered, amended, deleted or changed in any manner without the written approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and, in the case of the Series D Preferred Stock, also the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock, and in the case of any Series D-1 Warrant or Series D-2 Warrant, also the holder of such warrant. However, the 4.99% limitation would not prevent the holders from acquiring and selling in excess of 4.99% of our common stock through a series of exercises and conversions. Also includes 392,854 shares of common stock. (6) Includes 263,158 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock. Also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 747,353 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 446,429 shares is $0.28 per share of common stock, 65,789 shares exercisable at $0.38 per share of common stock, 135,135 shares exercisable at $0.37 per share of common stock, and 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share of common stock. Also includes 1,081,564 shares of common stock. Currently not the beneficial owner of all such shares of common stock. (7) Critical Mass Mail owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,027,027 shares of common stock. (8) Seneca Capital, L.P. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 417,205 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series B3 Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 188,408 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series A3 Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,060,352 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 790,082 warrants is $0.40 per share of common stock. The exercise price of 270,270 warrants is $0.37 per share of common stock. Also includes 270,270 shares of common stock. Seneca Capital, L.P. is not currently the beneficial owner of all of such shares of common stock. (9) Seneca Capital International, Ltd. owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 779,826 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series B3 Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,122,945 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of the warrants is $0.40 per share of common stock. Seneca Capital International, Ltd. is not currently the beneficial owner of all of such shares of common stock. (10) Advanced Systems Europe owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 120 shares of common stock subject to adjustment, issuable upon conversion of 1 share of Series A3 Preferred Stock it currently owns. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 886,997 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 775,886 warrants is $0.40 per share of common stock. The exercise price of 111,111 warrants is $0.45 per share of common stock. Also includes 594,444 shares of common stock. Advanced Systems Europe B.V. is not currently the beneficial owner of all of such shares of common stock. (11) Includes 394,737 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 242,258 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of 202,703 shares is $0.37 per share of common stock. 22,222 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share of common stock and 17,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. Also includes 476,942 shares of common stock. (12) Includes 23,594 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. Also includes 350,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. Also includes 27,778 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share of common stock Also includes 576,267 shares of common stock. 11 (13) Includes 234,375 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock, 88,359 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share, 35,391shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise, 150,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share, and 27,778 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also includes 261,111 shares of common stock. (14) Includes 78,125 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock, 29,453 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share, 11,797 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. Also includes 394,737 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock, 98,684 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 and 26,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60. Also includes 133,333 shares of common stock. (15) Includes 93,750 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock, 35,344 shares of common stock upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 and 14,156 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. Also includes 202,703 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 and 27,778 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45. Also includes 313,814 shares of common stock. Currently is not the beneficial owner of all of such shares of common stock. (16) Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 280,405 shares of common stock. Also includes 280,405 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (17) Includes 270,270 shares of common stock and 270,270 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (18) Includes 394,737 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 98,684 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 and 270,270 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37. Also includes 40,000 shares of common stock. Mr. Pizi is the CEO and a director of the Company. He also holds common stock and 1,187,798 stock options exercisable within 60 days that are not being registered for resale by means of this prospectus. (19) Includes 368,421 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 92,105 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38. (20) Includes 135,135 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share and 26,667 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share of common stock. Also includes 268,468 shares of common stock. (21) Includes 131,579 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 32,895 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38. Also includes100,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at $0.37 per share and 10,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at a $0.60 exercise price per share. Also includes 150,000 shares of common stock. (22) Includes 66,667 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share of common stock. Also includes 33,333 shares of common stock. (23) Includes 203,125 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock, 30,672 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise and 9,334 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. Also includes 144,445 shares of common stock. 12 (24) Includes 65,789 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 16,447 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 per share of common stock. Also includes 101,352 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at $0.37 per share and 13,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at a $0.60 exercise price. Also includes 168,019 shares of common stock. (25) North Sound Legacy Fund LLC owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 94,250 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share. It also owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 12,026 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. The holders may not exercise the warrants into shares of our common stock or convert shares of Series D Preferred Stock, if after the exercise or conversion, such holder, together with any of its affiliates, would beneficially own over 4.99% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. This restriction may not be altered, amended, deleted or changed in any manner without the written approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and, in the case of the Series D Preferred Stock, also the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock, and in the case of any Series D-1 Warrant or Series D-2 Warrant, also the holder of such warrant. However, the 4.99% limitation would not prevent the holders from acquiring and selling in excess of 4.99% of our common stock through a series of exercises and conversions. Also includes 43,647 shares of common stock. (26) Includes 176,719 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share, 70,781 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise and 93,057 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. (27) Includes 11,797 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise, 50,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share and 13,889 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also includes 233,681 shares of common stock. (28) Includes 150,000 shares of common stock and 150,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (29) Liraz owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,632 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment) issuable upon conversion of 1 shares of Series C Preferred Stock it currently owns, and shares of common stock issuable upon warrants to purchase 82,237 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment) for $0.38 per share. Also includes 150,000 shares of common stock for its guaranty of Level 8's term loan effective to November 8, 2004. (30) Includes 105,263 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 26,316 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 per share of common stock. Includes 13,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share of common stock. Also includes 66,667 shares of common stock. (31) Includes 41,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also includes 166,667 shares of common stock. (32) Includes 200,001 shares. (33) Includes 94,595 shares of common stock and 94,595 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (34) Includes 172,751 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $4.342 per share. (35) Includes 131,579 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 32,895 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38. (36) Includes 93,750 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock, 35,344 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share and 14,156 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. 13 (37) Includes 27,778 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also includes 111,111 shares of common stock. (38) Includes 67,568 shares of common stock and 67,568 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (39) Includes 20,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. Also includes 100,000 shares of common stock. (40) Includes 54,054 shares of common stock and 54,054 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (41) Includes 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 per share. Pyxis Link is not currently the beneficial owner of all of such shares of common stock. (42) Includes 42,162 shares of common stock and 42,162 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (43) Includes 16,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also includes 66,667 shares of common stock. (44) Includes 65,789 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 16,447 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 per share of common stock subject to adjustment. (45) Includes 40,541 shares of common stock and 40,541 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (46) Includes 13,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share of common stock. Also includes 66,667 shares of common stock. (47) Includes 13,889 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also includes 55,556 shares of common stock. (48) Includes 33,784 shares of common stock and 33,784 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (49) Includes 16,447 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 per share of common stock subject to adjustment, 29,453 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-1 Warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 per share, 11,797 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series D-2 Warrants at an exercise price the lower of $0.20 or the trading price of Level 8's common stock at the time of exercise. (50) Includes 11,111 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also include 44,444 shares of common stock. (51) Includes 27,027 shares of common stock and 27,027 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (52) Includes 53,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. (53) Includes 8,333 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also include 33,000 shares of common stock. (54) Includes 18,919 shares of common stock and 18,919 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (55) Includes 26,316 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock and 6,579 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 per share of common stock. (56) Includes 14,864 shares of common stock and 14,864 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. (57) Includes 13,514 shares of common stock and 13,514 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 per share. 14 (58) Includes 4,167 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. Also include 16,667 shares of common stock. (59) Includes 16,477 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 per share of common stock subject to adjustment. (60) Includes 12,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.45 per share. 15

(154)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,119 shares of common stock.

(155)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,114 shares of common stock.

(156)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,063 shares of common stock.

(157)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 2,013 shares of common stock.

25


(158)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,789 shares of common stock.

(159)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,745 shares of common stock.

(160)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 400 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Also owns 1,330 shares of common stock.

(161)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,666 shares of common stock.

(162)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,611 shares of common stock.

(163)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,579 shares of common stock.

(164)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,342 shares of common stock.

(165)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,341 shares of common stock.

(166)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,229 shares of common stock.

(167)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,079 shares of common stock.

(168)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 1,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $38 per share.

(169)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 550 shares of common stock.

(170)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 337 shares of common stock.

(171)Owns and may offer from time to time under this prospectus 93 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $7 per share.

26


PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering the shares of common stock on behalf of the selling stockholders. All costs, expenses and fees in connection with the registration of the shares offered by this prospectus will be borne by us, other than brokerage commissions and similar selling expenses, if any, attributable to the sale of shares which will be borne by the selling stockholders. We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Sales of shares may be effected by selling stockholders from time to time in one or more types of transactions (which may include block transactions) on the Nasdaq National Market, the Nasdaq SmallCap Market,, in the over-the-counter market, any exchange or quotation system, in negotiated transactions, through put or call options transactions relating to the shares, through short sales of shares, or a combination of any such methods of sale, and any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices. Such transactions may or may not involve brokers or dealers. The selling stockholders have advised us that they have not entered into any agreements, understandings or arrangements with any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding the sale of their securities, nor is there an underwriter or coordinated broker acting in connection with the proposed sale of shares by the selling stockholders.

The selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions. In connection with such transactions, broker-dealers or other financial institutions may engage in short sales of the shares or of securities convertible into or exchangeable for the shares in the course of hedging positions they assume with selling stockholders. The selling stockholders may also enter into options or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions which require the delivery to such broker-dealers or other financial institutions of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as amended or supplemented to reflect such transaction). The selling stockholders may pledge and/or loan these shares to broker-dealers who may borrow the shares against their hedging short position and in turn sell these shares under the prospectus to cover such short position.

The selling stockholders may make these transactions by selling shares directly to purchasers or to or through broker-dealers, which may act as agents or principals. Such broker-dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from selling stockholders and/or the purchasers of shares for whom such broker-dealers may act as agents or to whom they sell as principal, or both (which compensation as to a particular broker-dealer is not expected to be in excess of customary commissions).

The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers that act in connection with the sale of shares may be deemed to be "underwriters"“underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act, and any commissions received by such broker-dealers or any profit on the resale of the shares sold by them while acting as principals might be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions under the Securities Act. The selling stockholders may agree to indemnify any agent, dealer or broker-dealer that participates in transactions involving sales of the shares against certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act.

Because selling stockholders may be deemed "underwriters"“underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act, the selling stockholders may be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. We have informed the selling stockholders that the anti-manipulative provisions of Regulation M promulgated under the Exchange Act may apply to their sales in the market.

Selling stockholders also may resell all or a portion of the shares in open market transactions in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act provided they meet the criteria and conform to the requirements of Rule 144.

Upon our being notified by a selling stockholder that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares through a block trade, special offering, exchange distribution or secondary distribution or a purchase by a broker or dealer, a supplement to this prospectus will be filed, if required, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act, disclosing: o the name of each such selling stockholder and of the participating broker-dealer(s); o the number of shares involved; o the initial price at which such shares were sold; 16 o the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to such broker-dealer(s), where applicable; o that such broker-dealer(s) did not conduct any investigation to verify the information set out or incorporated by reference in this prospectus; and o other facts material to the transactions.

·the name of each such selling stockholder and of the participating broker-dealer(s);

·the number of shares involved;

·the initial price at which such shares were sold;

·the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to such broker-dealer(s), where applicable;

27


·that such broker-dealer(s) did not conduct any investigation to verify the information set out or incorporated by reference in this prospectus; and

·other facts material to the transactions.

In addition, upon our being notified by a selling stockholder that a donee or pledgee intends to sell more than 500 shares, a supplement to this prospectus will be filed. The selling stockholder may from time to time pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares or common stock or warrants owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus, or under an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933 amending the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus.

The selling stockholders also may transfer the shares of common stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus. 17


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data is derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Company. The data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, related notes, and other financial information included herein.
THREE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31, ----------------------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- SELECTED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA (unaudited) Revenue ............................ $ 52,920 $ 83,729 $ 17,357 $ 3,101 $ 530 $ 143 $ 83 Loss from continuing operations .... $(15,477) $(28,367) $(58,060) $(13,142) $ (9,874) $ (2,974) $ (2,627) Loss from continuing operations per common share - basic and diluted $ (1.78) $ (2.10) $ (3.70) $ (0.75) $ (0.54) $ (0.19) $ (0.09) Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding- basic and diluted ..... 8,918 14,019 15,958 18,877 21,463 19,233 30,727
THREE MONTHS ENDED AT DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31, --------------- --------- 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA (unaudited) Working capital (deficiency) $ (36) $ 28,311 $ (4,529) $ (6,254) $ (6,555) $ (4,421) $ (6,654) Total assets ................ 133,581 169,956 35,744 11,852 5,362 11,054 4,887 Long-term debt, including current maturities ........ 27,593 27,133 4,845 2,893 2,756 2,497 2,587 Senior convertible redeemable preferred stock ........... -- -- -- -- 3,355 3,530 2,692 Loans from related companies, net of current maturities ... 4,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- Stockholders' equity (deficit) . 72,221 117,730 13,893 1,653 (6,103) (710) (5,964)
18 Weighted average shares outstanding have been restated retroactively to reflect the 100:1 reverse stock split.

  
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
  
2002
 
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
2006
 
SELECTED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA                
Revenue $3,101   $530   $775   $785   $972 
Loss from continuing operations $(13,142)$(9,874)$(9,731)$(3,681)$(2,997)
Loss from continuing operations per common share - basic and diluted $(74.89)$(54.00)$(27.05)$(8.27)$(0.25)
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding- basic and diluted  189  215  360  445  35,182 



  
December 31,
 
  
2002
 
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
2006
 
SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA                
Working capital (deficiency) $(6,254)  $(6,555)  $(10,255)  $(13,894)  $(7,894)
Total assets  11,852  5,362  530  241  597 
Long-term debt, including current maturities  2,893  2,756  5,444  7,931  2,932 
Senior convertible redeemable preferred stock  --  3,355  1,367  1,061  -- 
Stockholders' equity (deficiency)  1,653  (6,103) (11,857) (15,076) (7,912)

28


BUSINESS OVERVIEW We provide next generation application

Overview

Cicero Inc. is aprovider of business integration productssoftware, which enables organizations to integrate new and services that are based on open technology standards and are licensed to a wide range of customers. Our software helps organizations leverage their extensive system and business process investments, increase operational efficiencies, reduce costs and strengthen valued customer relationships by uniting disparate applications, systems,existing information and processes at the desktop. Our business integration software addresses the emerging need for companies’ information systems to deliver enterprise-wide views of their business information processes.In addition to software products, we also provide technical support, training and consulting services as part of its commitment to providing its customers with industry-leading integration solutions. Our consulting team has in-depth experience in developing successful enterprise-class solutions as well as valuable insight into the business information needs of customers in the Global 5000.

Our focus is on the emerginggrowing desktop integration and business process automation market with our Cicero(R)Cicero® product. CiceroCicero® is a business application integration software productplatform that maximizesenhances end-user productivity, streamlines business operations and integrates systems and applications that would not otherwise work together. Cicero software offers a proven, innovative departure from traditional, costly and labor-intensive approaches toenterprise application integration, thatwhich occurs at the server level. Cicero® provides non-invasive application integration at the desktop level. Desktop level integration provides the user with a single environment with a consistent look and feel for diverse applications across multiple operating environments, reduces enterprise integration implementation cost and time, and supports a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA). Cicero’s desktop level integration also enables clients to transform applications, business processes and human expertise into a seamless, cost effective business solution that provides a cohesive, task-oriented and role-centric interface that works the way people think.

By using Cicero,Cicero® software, companies can decrease their customer management costs, increaseimprove their customer service level and more efficiently cross-sell the full range of their products and services resulting in an overall increase in return on their information technology investments. In addition, CiceroCicero® software enables organizations to reduce the business risks inherent in replacement or re-engineering of mission-critical applications and extend the productive life and functional reach of their application portfolio. Cicero

Cicero® software is engineered to harnessintegrate diverse business applications and shape them to more effectively serve the people who use them. CiceroCicero® provides an intuitive integration and development environment, thatwhich simplifies the integration of complex multi-platform applications. CiceroCicero® provides a unique approach that allows companies to organize components of their existing applications to better align them with tasks and operational processes. In addition, Cicero streamlines all activitiescan streamline end-user tasks by providing a single, seamless user interface for simple access to allmultiple systems associated with a task. Ciceroor be configured to display one or more composite applications to enhance productivity. Cicero® software enables automatic information sharing among line-of-business applications and tools. CiceroIt is ideal for deployment in contact centers where its highly productive, task-oriented user interface promotes user efficiency. Until October 2002, weFinally, Cicero® software, by integrating diverse applications across multiple operating systems, is ideal for the financial services, for which Cicero® was initially developed, insurance, telecommunications, intelligence, security, law enforcement, governmental and other industries requiring a cost-effective, proven application integration solution. Cicero® is also offered products underan integration solution for merger and acquisition events where the sharing of data and combining of systems is imperative.

Some of the companies and other users that have implemented or are implementing our Geneva brand name to provide organizations with systems integration. Our systems integration products included Geneva Enterprise IntegratorCicero software product include Merrill Lynch, Nationwide Financial Services, IBM and Geneva Business Process Automator. These products wereN.E.W. Customer Service Companies. We have also sold to EM Software Solutionsintelligence, security, law enforcement and other government users.

In addition to our Cicero® product, our Ensuredmail email encryption products address information and security compliance requirements from the individual to the enterprise. The Ensuredmail suite of products includes the Enterprise Email Encryption Server, and Email Encryption Desktop for individual use. All of the Ensuredmail products use 3-DES or AES encryption technology and are tested and federally certified FIPS 140-1. Ensuredmail products are easy to install, use and administer. They also use rules and other utilities that allow users to flag messages including attachments for encryption. Unlike other secure email encryption software applications, Ensuredmail products do not require the recipient to install software or use special secure keys to open and read messages and attachments. In conjunction with Cicero software, Ensuredmail email encryption technology has been used to secure information shared in Cicero integration projects.

29


Some of the companies using Ensuredmail server products include the United Postal Service, E-Loan, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Science Application International Association, Wilmington Trust, Delta Dental, Truog-Ryding Company, and hundreds of individual users with the Ensuredmail Email Desktop product. Ensuredmail customers use email encryption primarily to secure outbound messages with confidential information for compliance (e.g., HIPAA) and security purposes.

Cicero Inc. in October 2002. We werewas incorporated in New York in 1988 as Level 8 Systems, Inc. and re-incorporated in Delaware in 1999. Effective January 2003, ourOur principal executive offices were relocated to 214 Carnegie Center, Suite 303, Princeton,are located at 1433 State Highway 34, Building C, Farmingdale, New Jersey 0854007727 and our telephone number is (609) 987-9001.(732) 919-3150. Our web site is located at www.level8.com. STRATEGIC REALIGNMENT www.ciceroinc.com.

Strategic Realignment

Historically, we have been a global provider of software solutions to help companies integrate new and existing applications as well as extend those applications to the Internet. This market segment is commonly known as "Enterprise“Enterprise Application Integration"Integration” or "EAI." Historically,“EAI.” EAI solutions work directly at the server or back-office level allowing disparate applications to communicate with each other.

Until early 2001, we focused primarily on the development, sale and support of EAI solutions through our Geneva product suite. After extensive strategic consultation with outside advisors and an internal analysis of our products and services, we recognized that a new market opportunity had emerged. This opportunity was represented by the increasing need to integrate applications that are physically resident on different hardware platforms, a typical situation in larger companies. In most cases, companies with large customer bases utilize numerous different, or "disparate," applications that were not designed to effectively communicate and pass information. In addition, traditional EAI is often times too costly and time-consuming to implement. It also requires a group of programmers with the necessary skills and ongoing invasive changes to application software code throughout the enterprise. With Cicero,Cicero® software, which non-invasively integrates the functionality of these disparate applications at the desktop, we believe that we have found a novelunique solution to this disparate application problem. We believe that our existing experience in and understanding of the EAI marketplace coupled with the unique CiceroCicero® software solution, which approaches traditional EAI needs in a more effective manner, position us to be a competitive provider of business integration solutions to the financial services industry and other industries with large deployed call centers. 19 contact centers, as well as our other target markets.

We originally licensed the CiceroCicero® technology and related patents on a worldwide basis from Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated in August of 2000 under a license agreement containing standard provisions and a two-year exclusivity period. On January 3, 2002, the license agreement was amended to extend our exclusive worldwide marketing, sales and development rights to CiceroCicero® in perpetuity (subject to Merrill Lynch's rights to terminate in the event of bankruptcy or a change in control of Level 8)the Company) and to grant ownership rights in the CiceroCicero® trademark. We are indemnified by Merrill Lynch indemnifies us with regard to the rights granted to us by them. Consideration for the original CiceroCicero® license consisted of 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. In exchange for the amendment, we granted an additional 250,000 shares of common stock to MLBC, Inc., a Merrill Lynch affiliate and entered into a royalty sharing agreement. Under the royalty sharing agreement, we pay a royalty of 3% of the sales price for each sale of CiceroCicero® or related maintenance services. The royalties over the life of the agreement are not payable in excess of $20,000,000. In connection with executing our strategic realignment and focusing on Cicero, we have restructured our business, reduced our number of employees and, in the fourth quarter of 2002, sold the remaining assets associated with Geneva Enterprise Integrator and Geneva Business Process Automator. In April 2001, management reassessed the methodology by which the Company would make operating decisions and allocate resources. Operating decisions and performance assessments were based on the following reportable segments: (1) Desktop Integration (Cicero), (2) System Integration (Geneva Enterprise Integrator and Geneva Business Process Automator) and (3) Messaging and Application Engineering (Geneva Integration Broker, Geneva Message Queuing, Geneva XIPC and Geneva AppBuilder).$20 million. We have sold most ofcompletely re-engineered the assets comprising the MessagingCicero® software to provide increased functionality and Application Engineering Products segment and all of the assets in the Systems Integration Segment. The Company has recognized the Systems Integration segment as a discontinued business and accordingly, has reclassified those assets and liabilities on the accompanying balance sheets for 2002 and 2003 and segregated the results of operations under gain or loss from a discontinued business on the accompanying statement of operations. As such, the Systems Integration segment has been eliminated. Geneva Integration Broker is the only current software product represented in the Messaging and Application Engineering segment. much more powerful integration capabilities.

Our future revenues are entirely dependent on acceptance of a newly developed and marketed product, Cicero,Cicero® which has limited success in commercial markets to date. We have experienced negative cash flows from operations for the past three years. At December 31, 2003, we2006, the Company had a working capital deficiency of approximately $6,555.$7.9 million. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt that the Company can continue as a going concern, and the independent auditor’s report accompanying our financial statements raises doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In order to address these issues and to obtain adequate financing for our operations for the next twelve months, we are actively promoting and expanding itsour product line and continuescontinue to negotiate with significant customers thatwho have begun or finalizeddemonstrated interest in the "proof of concept" stage with the CiceroCicero® technology. We believe that we are experiencing difficulty increasing sales revenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about the Company’s financial viabilityviability. Cicero® software is a new “category defining” product in that most EAI projects are performed at the server level and Cicero’s integration occurs at the desktop level without the need to open and modify the underlying code for those applications being integrated. Many companies are not aware of the Company.this new technology or tend to look toward more traditional and accepted approaches. We

30


are attempting to solve the former problem by improving the market'smarket’s knowledge and understanding of Cicero through increased marketing and leveraging its limited number of reference accounts.accounts while enhancing its list of resellers and system integrators to assist in the sales and marketing process. Additionally, we are continuously seeking additional equity capital or other strategic transactions in the near term to provide additional liquidity. We closed

Plan of Recapitalization

In December 2006, we completed our Plan of Recapitalization, approved by our stockholders at a Special Stockholders Meeting held on November 16, 2006. The Plan included the strategic acquisitionfollowing elements:

·Provided our Board of Directors with discretionary authority, pursuant to the plan of recapitalization to effect a reverse stock at a ratio of 20:1 to 100:1, and on November 20, 2006 our Board of Directors fixed the ratio at 100:1;

·Changed the name of the Company from Level 8 Systems, Inc. to Cicero Inc.;

·Increased the authorized common stock of the Company from 85 million shares to 215 million shares;

·Converted existing preferred shares into a new Series A-1 Preferred Stock;

·Converted and cancelled senior reorganization debt in the aggregate principal amount of $2.3 million into 3,438,473 shares of common stock;

·Converted the aggregate principal amount of $3.9 million of convertible bridge notes into 30,508,448 shares of our common stock;

·Converted each share of Series A3 Preferred Stock into 4.489 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock;

·Converted each share of Series B3 Preferred Stock into 75 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock;

·Converted each share of Series C Preferred Stock into 39.64 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock;

·Converted an aggregate principal amount of $1,060,562 of Series D Preferred Stock, recorded as mezzanine financing, into 53 Preferred Stock; and

·Converted an aggregate principal amount of $992,000 of convertible promissory notes into 1,591 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

In November 2006, we reached an agreement with Bank Hapoalim, the holder of an encryption technology asset in January 2004our term loan and a private placementLiraz, the guarantor of the term loan, to extend the maturity date of the term loan until October 31, 2007. In consideration for the extension of the guaranty, we issued to Liraz 60,000 shares of our common stock wherein we raised approximately $1,247. stock.

We expect that increased revenues will reduce our operating losses in future periods,periods; however, there can be no assurance that managementwe will be successful in executing as anticipated or in a timely manner. If these strategies are unsuccessful, we may have to pursue other means of financing that may not be on terms favorable to usthe Company or ourits stockholders. If we are unable to increase cash flow or obtain financing, itwe may not be able to generate enough capital to fund operations for the next twelve months. MARKET OPPORTUNITY DESKTOP INTEGRATION SEGMENT PRODUCTS - CICERO At our current rates of expense and assuming revenues for the next twelve months at an annualized rate of our revenue for the year ended 2006, we will be able to fund planned operations with existing capital resources for a minimum of four months and experience negative cash flow of approximately $2,000,000 during the next twelve months to maintain planned operations. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements presented herein do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

31


Market Opportunity

Contact Centers Market

Our target markets for Cicero areCicero® software include the customer contact centers of large consumer orientedconsumer-oriented businesses, such as in the financial services, insurance and telecommunications industries. Large-scale customer contact centers are characterized by large numbers of customer service agents that process phone calls, faxes, e-mailsemails and other incoming customer inquiries and requests. In today’s highly competitive markets, companies increasingly focus on the provision of customer service as a means of increasing customer satisfaction, customer retention rates and cross-selling opportunities. For most companies, the key organization involved in this effort is the company’s customer contact center, or call center, whose personnel are directly customer-facing.

To provide quality customer service, customer service representatives (“CSR”) must be able to answer a customer’s questions quickly, handle any request the customer may have, and do so in an efficient and pleasant manner. One of the significant challenges in the provision of quality customer service is the complexity of the CSR desktop. This is due to the number of software applications on the CSR’s computer desktop, to the complexity of the applications used on the desktop, and changes in business processed within the organization. Most CSRs must manage three or more applications on their desktop, including billing, inventory, delivery tracking, call tracking and customer relationship management software. In many instances, CSRs have six, eight, or ten or more applications they must learn and manage in order to provide service.

The number of applications on the typical CSR desktop is increasing due to the broader range of services that organizations are demanding of contact centers, the desire for CSRs to resolve calls during the first contact with the customer, and the need to sell additional products. These applications are often a combination of Windows, web and host centric applications that are not integrated, requiring the CSR to learn and master them to perform their jobs.

Our goal is to greatly increase the efficiency of customer service agentsCSRs in our target markets, thereby lowering operating costs and increasing customer retention and customer satisfaction.markets. This increased efficiency is attained in a non-invasive manner, allowing companies to continue using their existing applications in a more productive manner. 20

Generally, managers of customer contact centers are under pressure to provide increased customer service at the lowest possible cost while dealing withaddressing high employee turnover and training costs. Some of the primary challenges faced by customer contact centers include: o CUSTOMER SERVICE. Currently, most customer contact centers require multiple transfers to different agents to deal with diverse customer service issues. A one-call, one-contact system enhances customer service by avoiding these multiple transfers. Ideally, the customer service agent provides the call-in customer with multi-channel customer interfaces with timely access to all information that the customer needs. Increasing customer service and customer intimacy is one of the primary metrics on which contact centers are evaluated by management. o CONTACT CENTER STAFFING. The contact center industry is characterized by high training costs, operational complexity, continuous turnover and increasing costs per call. These difficulties stem from increased customer expectations, the ever-increasing complexity and diversity of the business applications used by customer service agents, and pressure to decrease training time and increase the return on investment in customer service agents. o INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION. Many industries in our target market, including the financial services industry, are in a constant state of consolidation. When companies consolidate, the customer contact centers are generally merged to lower overall costs and to reduce redundancies. This consolidation generally leads to re-training and the use of multiple applications handling similar functions that can be quite difficult to integrate successfully. OUR SOLUTION We were previously a provider of software that integrates an enterprise's applications at the server level so that disparate applications can communicate with each other, or the EAI industry. Based on our experience in the EAI industry, we determined that a compelling product would be one that integrates disparate applications at a visual level in addition to at the server level. As a result, we proceeded to procure an exclusive license to develop and market Cicero. Cicero was developed internally by Merrill Lynch to increase the efficiency of 30,000 employees that have daily contact with Merrill Lynch customers. When coupled with solutions from other EAI vendors, Cicero becomes a comprehensive business solution and provides our customers with a front-to-back integrated system that appears as a single application to the end-user. Cicero

·
Long Average Call Handling Time. Currently, most customer contact centers use several applications requiring the CSR to ask customers for account and telephone information, navigate between applications, and to retype customer information in several screens. This increases the overall call handling time and decreases customer satisfaction. In addition, many contact centers require multiple transfers to different agents to deal with diverse customer service issues. A one-call, one-contact system reduces average call handling time and enhances customer service by avoiding these multiple transfers. Ideally, the customer service representative provides the call-in customer with multi-channel customer interfaces with timely access to all information that the customer needs. Reducing average call handling time and increasing customer service and customer intimacy are some of the primary metrics on which contact centers are evaluated by management. Improving customer service through simplified processes and having access to additional information in an integrated environment also provides opportunities to cross-sell other products.

·
Training and Turnover of Contact Center Staff. The contact center industry is characterized by high training costs, operational complexity, continuous turnover and increasing costs per call. These difficulties stem from increased customer expectations, the ever-increasing complexity and diversity of the business applications used by customer service representatives, and pressure to decrease training time and increase the return on investment in customer service representatives.

·
Industry Consolidation. Many industries in our target market, including the financial services industry, are in a constant state of consolidation. When companies consolidate through mergers and acquisitions, the customer contact centers are generally merged to lower overall costs and to reduce redundancies. This consolidation generally leads to re-training and the use of multiple applications handling similar functions that can be quite difficult to integrate successfully.

32


Our Solution

Cicero® is a software product that allows companies to integrate their existing applications into a seamless integrated desktop. Cicero subordinates and controls most Windows-based applications and provides a seamless environment with a consistent look and feel. The end-user can navigate any number of applications whether local, client-server, mainframe legacy or web-browser in a consistent and intuitive way that is completely customizable by their firm. The CiceroCicero® software solution provides the following key features: o INTEGRATED END-USER ENVIRONMENT. The end-user can use all of the applications necessary for his or her job function from a single environment with a consistent look and feel. Cicero integrates the execution and functionality of a variety of custom or packaged Windows-based applications. If a software product is designed to provide output into a Windows environment, Cicero can subordinate its presentation and control it through the Cicero environment. The Cicero desktop is constructed at run-time, so selected applications and user interface components are dynamically created and initialized. This makes the desktop environment very flexible and easily adapted and maintained as business conditions change. o INFORMATION CENTER. The Information Center is a customizable hub of critical information that facilitates the effective execution of processes and minimizes the need to enter frequently accessed information repeatedly. The Cicero Information Center provides a configurable information hub to enable end users to interact with selected applications on a continuous basis. The information center is frequently used to support incoming message alerts, scrolling headlines, key operational statistics, interaction with Integrated Voice Response systems, and real-time video. Any information that is time-sensitive or actionable can be displayed side-by-side with the currently selected application page and information can be readily exchanged between the Information Center and other applications. 21 o CONTEXT SHARING. Cicero's unique, patented architecture enables just the right information in any workstation application to be shared with the other applications that need it. Cicero's context-sharing Application Bus largely eliminates the need for re-keying customer data, simplifies customer information updates, and reduces errors and re-work. Context is visually integrated into the Cicero desktop through the Information Center, enabling more efficient customer service. o ADVANCED INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURE. Cicero is a sophisticated application integration platform that subordinates and controls and non-invasively integrates any applications with a "footprint" in the Windows environment. Cicero's publish and subscribe bus architecture provides for efficient inter-application communication. Its event management capabilities extend the usefulness and life span of legacy architectures and provide a common architecture for events across all platforms. Cicero also supports an open platform architecture for communication and interoperability, native scripting languages and XML, and facilities to enable single sign-on solutions while respecting security standards and directory services. o MANAGEMENT TOOLS.

·
Integrated End-User Environment. The end-user can navigate any number of applications, whether local, client-server, mainframe legacy or web-browser, from a single environment with a consistent look and feel. Cicero® software integrates the execution and functionality of a variety of custom or packaged Windows-based applications. If a software product is designed to provide output into a Windows environment, Cicero® can subordinate its presentation and control it through the Cicero environment. Cicero® software can guide the user by providing assistance in tasks consisting of multiple steps, and make additional information accessible without any extra effort on the user’s part.

·
Information Center. The optional Information Center is a customizable hub of critical information that facilitates the effective execution of processes and minimizes the need to enter frequently accessed information repeatedly. The Information Center is a composite application and a subset of the Cicero Graphical User Interface Manager, and provides a configurable information hub to enable end-users to interact with selected applications on a continuous basis and access real-time information. The Information Center is frequently used to support incoming message alerts, scrolling headlines, key operational statistics, interaction with integrated voice response systems and real-time video. Any information that is time-sensitive or actionable can be displayed side-by-side with the currently selected application page and information can be readily exchanged between the optional Information Center and other applications.

·
Context Sharing. Cicero® software’s unique, patented technology enables the right information in any workstation application to be shared with the other applications that need it. Cicero® software’s Context-Sharing Manager within the Cicero Application Bus largely eliminates the need for re-keying customer data, simplifies customer information updates, and reduces errors and re-work. It also allows one subordinated application to perform processing based on a change in another application, thus causing applications to work together without end-user intervention.

·
Advanced Integration Architecture. Cicero® software is a sophisticated application integration platform that subordinates and controls and non-invasively integrates any applications with a light “footprint” in the Windows environment. The Cicero® software’s publish and subscribe bus architecture provides for efficient inter-application communication. Its event management capabilities allow applications to respond to events that occur within unrelated applications, making the integration more responsive. Cicero® software extends the usefulness and life span of legacy architectures and provides a common architecture for events across all platforms. Applications are integrated using Cicero Studio, a visual integration tool within the Cicero® software product which allows applications to be quickly integrated. Integrators are not required to understand the details of the underlying technology when integrating an application. Cicero® software also supports open platform architecture for communication and interoperability, native scripting languages and XML. Cicero® software is designed to be extendible, allowing extensions to new environments by using well-defined plug-ins or connectors. Cicero® software can also present components or elements of integration as web services and incoming web services requests can initiate Cicero® software processes without requiring any action by a user.

·
Management Tools. Comprehensive tools are built into the system for version management, automatic component updates and user preference configuration. Remote control and diagnostic tools are integrated to provide off-site help desk and troubleshooting personnel with access to assist them in their support duties. In addition, built-in trace and history mechanisms allow user’s management to obtain operational information that can detail users’ activities or point out operational problems. Furthermore, Cicero® software can enforce steps to be performed in a particular order, if needed, so as to enforce conformance with regulations, such as HIPAA, across multiple applications, or when an older, non-conformant application needs to be used in such an environment.

Deployment of the CiceroCicero® software solution can provide our customers with the following key benefits: o LOWER AVERAGE COST PER CALL AND AVERAGE CALL TIME. Cicero increases the efficiency of the customer service agent by placing all productivity applications within a few mouse clicks

·
Lower Average Cost Per Call and Average Call Time. Because Cicero® presents users with a single interface through which applications are accessed, it eliminates the need to navigate through and between applications.

33


Therefore, it eliminates redundant data entry, cuts keystrokes and consolidating all standard applications into a single integrated desktop.streamlines or even eliminates process steps, including time consuming call wrap-up processes, thereby generating greater efficiency. This enables increased first call resolution and significant reduction in average call times. Cost per call is lowered because the customer service agentrepresentative is more productive in moving between disparate applications and is able to handle different requests without having to transfer the customer to another customer service agent. o REDUCE STAFF COST. Cicero reduces staff cost in two ways. First, by increasing the efficiency of each customer service agent, a contact center can handle the same volume of customer service requests with a smaller staff. Secondly, because Cicero simplifies the use of all contact center applications, training costs and time can be reduced, placing newly hired staff into productive positions faster than other contract center applications. o INCREASE CROSS-SELLING EFFICIENCY. The consolidation of all customer data and customer specific applications can increase the efficiency of cross selling of products and services. For instance, a Cicero enabled contact center might be configured to inform the customer service agent that the customer, while a brokerage services customer, does not use bill paying or other offered services. On the other hand, Cicero can help prevent customer service agents from selling a product that is inappropriate for that customer or a product or service that the customer already has through the company. Increasing the efficiency of cross selling can both increase revenues and avoid customer dissatisfaction. o DELIVER BEST IN CLASS CUSTOMER SERVICE. Increasing customer service is one of the primary methods by which a company in highly competitive customer focused industries such as financial services can differentiate itself from its competition. By increasing the efficiency and training level of its agents, decreasing average time per call and increasing effective cross-selling, the Cicero enabled contact center presents its customers with a more intimate and satisfying customer service experience that can aid in both customer retention and as a differentiator for customer acquisition. o PRESERVE EXISTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT. Cicero integrates applications at the presentation level, which allows better use of existing custom designed applications and divergent computing platforms (e.g., midrange, client/server, LAN and Web), which are not readily compatible with each other or with legacy mainframe systems. Linking together the newer computing applications to existing systems helps preserve and increase the return on the investments made by organizations in their information technology systems. 22 productive.

·
Reduce Staff Cost. Cicero® software can reduce staff cost in two ways. First, by increasing the efficiency of each customer service representative, a contact center can handle the same volume of customer service requests with a smaller staff. Secondly, training costs and time can be reduced, placing newly hired staff into productive positions faster than other contract center applications.

·
Increase Cross-Selling Efficiency. The consolidation of all customer data and customer specific applications can increase the efficiency of cross-selling of products and services. For instance, a Cicero® enabled contact center might be configured to inform the customer service representatives that the customer, while a brokerage services customer, does not use bill paying or other offered services. On the other hand, Cicero® software can help prevent customer service representatives from selling a product that is inappropriate for that customer or a product or service that the customer already has. Increasing the efficiency of cross-selling can both increase revenues and avoid customer dissatisfaction.

·
Deliver Best in Class Customer Service. Increasing customer service is one of the primary methods by which a company in highly competitive customer focused industries such as financial services can differentiate itself from its competition. By increasing the efficiency of its customer service representatives, decreasing average time per call and increasing effective cross-selling, the Cicero-enabled contact center presents its customers with a more intimate and satisfying customer service experience that can aid in both customer retention and as a differentiator for customer acquisition. The access to multiple platforms through one user-friendly interface also improves the experience of the customer service representative, leading to improved customer service representative morale and productivity.

·
Preserve Existing Information Technology Investment. Cicero® software integrates applications at the desktop level, which allows better use of existing custom designed applications and divergent computing platforms (e.g., midrange, client/server, LAN and Web), which are not readily compatible with each other or with legacy mainframe systems. Linking together the newer computing applications to existing systems helps preserve and increase the return on the investments made by organizations in their information technology systems.

Additionally, by visually and structurally linking the flexibility and innovations available on newer computing platforms and applications to the rich databases and functions that are typically maintained on the larger mainframe computers, organizations can utilize this information in new ways. The CiceroCicero® software solution helps organizations bridge the gap between legacy systems and newer platforms and the result is the extension of existing capabilities to a modern streamlined interface in which the underlying system architectures, such as the Web, mainframe, mid-range or client-server, are transparent to the end-user customer service agent, thereby preserving the existing information technology investments and increasing efficiency between applications. o SUPPORT A BROAD RANGE OF APPLICATIONS, PLATFORMS AND STANDARDS. The IT departments of larger enterprises need solutions to integrate a broad array of applications and platforms using a wide variety of industry standards to ensure ease of implementation The Cicero solution provides visual application integration solutions that support common industry standards and can handle a wide array of disparate applications and data types while operating on a Windows NT, Windows XP or Windows 2000 platform. The Cicero

·
Support a Broad Range of Applications, Platforms and Standards. The IT departments of larger enterprises need solutions to integrate a broad array of applications and platforms using a wide variety of industry standards such as BPEL and Service-Oriented Architecture. The Cicero® software solution provides visual application integration solutions that support common industry standards and can handle a wide array of disparate applications and data types while operating on a Windows NT, Windows XP or Windows 2000 platforms. The Cicero® software solution can be used to link custom or packaged applications together regardless of the tools or programming language used to create the application by integrating those applications at the desktop level.

·
Ease of Implementation and Enhanced Information Technology Productivity. The Cicero® software solution allows customers to create comprehensive data transformation and information exchange solutions without the need for custom or packaged applications together regardless of the tools or programming language used to create the application by integrating those applications at the presentation level. o EASE OF IMPLEMENTATION AND ENHANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTIVITY. The Cicero solution allows contact center and financial services managers to create comprehensive data transformation and information exchange solutions without the need for non-standard coding. Our products provide pre-built adapters for a wide variety of systems that are pre-programmed for transforming data into the format required by that system and transporting it using the appropriate transport mechanism. This greatly simplifies and speeds implementation of new solutions into the deployed Cicero framework. For instance, while in operation at Merrill Lynch, Cicero® was updated to include software for Siebel Systems over a period of only two days when Merrill Lynch decided to implement the Siebel Systems solution. The Cicero® software solution allows users to rapidly integrate new and existing applications with little or no customization required.

34


Our products provide pre-built adapters for a wide variety of different systems that are pre-programmed for transforming data into the format required by that system and transporting it using the appropriate transport mechanism. This greatly simplifies and speeds implementation of new solutions into the deployed Cicero framework. For instance, while in operation at Merrill Lynch, Cicero was updated to include software for Siebel Systems over a period of only two days when Merrill Lynch decided to implement the Siebel Systems solution. The Cicero solution allows our target markets to rapidly integrate new and existing applications with little or no customization required. OUR STRATEGY Strategy

Our goal is to be thea recognized global leader in providing complete desktop level application integration to the financial services industry. The following are the keyour target markets. Key elements of our strategy: o LEVERAGE OUR EXISTING CUSTOMERS AND EXPERIENCE IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY. We have had success instrategy include the past with our Geneva products in the financial services industry. We intend to utilize these long-term relationships and our understanding of the business to create opportunities for sales of the Cicero solution. o BUILD ON OUR SUCCESSES TO EXPAND INTO NEW MARKETS. Our short-term goal is to gain a significant presence in the financial services industry with the Cicero solution. The financial services industry is ideal for Cicero because each entity has a large base of installed users that use the same general groups of applications. Cicero, however, can be used in any industry that has large contact centers, such as telecommunications and insurance. o DEVELOP STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS. The critical success factor for customers implementing Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solutions in their contact centers is to have the right balance of technology and service provision.following:

·
Expand into Our Target Markets. Our short-term goal is to gain a presence in contact centers, such as in the financial services industry with the Cicero® software solution. The financial services industry is ideal for Cicero® because each entity has a large base of installed users that use the same general groups of applications. However, Cicero® software can be used in any industry that needs to integrate applications and processes, such as the telecommunications and insurance industries. Additionally, we believe that state and local governments, first responders, intelligence and defense agencies are excellent target markets for integration of legacy applications. Since the beginning of 2005, we entered into an agreement to install Cicero software throughout N.E.W. Customer Service Companies, a contact center outsourcing company, to shorten call times, improve agent efficiency and improve customer satisfaction. We have recently deployed our software to Merrill Lynch’s International Wealth Management brokers. In addition, we have licensed Cicero software to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the West Windsor Township, New Jersey Police Department. The latter agency is deploying Cicero in their Public Safety Answering Point. In this environment, Cicero® software will allow for fast and accurate retrieval of National Crime Information Center (NCIC) wanted person and related information, Interstate Identification Index, and National Law Enforcement Telecommunications systems, as well as various state criminal history and warrant data bases, motor vehicle records, and local arrest records.

·
Develop Strategic Partnerships. The critical success factor for customers implementing Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solutions in their contact centers is to have the right balance of technology and service provision. Similarly, penetration into the government market requires alliances with proven government system integrators and suppliers. To supplement our direct dales efforts, are implementing a tightly focused strategic teaming approach with a selected group of well-known consultancy and systems integration firms that specialize in financial services, government and eCRM integrated solutions. Since announcing the general availability of Cicero® 6.0 in May 2004, we have entered into strategic partnerships with the following system integrators/resellers, for integrated business solutions: ThinkCentric, Hewlett Packard andHouse of Code. In addition, we have entered into strategic partnerships with Silent Systems, Inc. (a consultancy and reselling organization), ADPI LLC (a consultancy and reseller organization), and Pilar Services, Inc. (a government focused integrator and reseller). The Company has no material dependency on any of these organizations, but rather looks to build upon these relationships as additional outlets for its products. Leveraging these organizations, who will provide such integration services as architecture planning, technology integration and business workflow improvement, allows us to focus on core application system needs and how Cicero® best addresses them, while our partners will surround the technology with appropriate industry and business knowledge.

·
Leverage Our In-House Expertise in the Cicero® Software. Merrill Lynch originally developed Cicero® internally for use by approximately 30,000 professionals worldwide. To approach the market from a position of strength, we have added members of the Merrill Lynch development team to our Cicero® development team. We recruited and hired Anthony Pizi, First Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Merrill Lynch’s Private Technology’s Architecture and Service Quality Group, and the Cicero® project director as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer (currently Chief Information Officer) as well as several of the primary Cicero® engineers from Merrill Lynch to support our ongoing Cicero® development efforts.

·
Utilize Market Analyses to Demonstrate Tangible Return-On-Investment results. Most contact centers benchmark their operational and services levels against established industry norms. Metrics such as average waiting time in the call queue, call abandonment rates, after call service work and percentage of one-call completion are typically measured against norms and trends. We believe that use of Cicero® will provide tangible, demonstrable improvements to these metrics. In addition, Cicero® technology can integrate applications and processes more efficiently than other competing solutions. This reduces costs to customers and provides a faster return on investment than competing products.

·
Augment our product line with complementary product offerings. In this area, we use three strategies. The first is to acquire, when possible, complementary products that can be sold on their own and can also complement the Cicero® software product offering. In furtherance of such strategy, we have acquired the Ensuredmail

35


product, which has been licensed both on its own, as well as eCRMin conjunction with and as an integrated solutions. Leveragingfeature of Cicero® software, adding additional functionality in the nature of encrypted email capability. When we bought the Ensuredmail assets in January 2004, purchased solely for shares our common stock, Ensuredmail customers included the U.S. Air Force, UPS, leading financial services companies and other multinational corporations. We announced the general availability of a significant upgrade to Ensuredmail for the desktop in March 2004 and small business version in July 2005. Our first major customer for Ensuredmail after the acquisition was Science Applications International Corporation. In August 2005, we entered into a license of our Ensuredmail product, to ITX Corp., a business consulting and technology solutions company, as an enhancement to ITX’s existing hosted email solution. In addition, we agreed to co-market with ITX a new hosted secure email service to customers who want to outsource their email services. The second strategy is to develop Cicero® connectors that facilitate the integration of existing products under Cicero® technology. Some of these organizations, who will provideconnectors may be delivered along with Cicero®, while others may be licensed under separate product codes. The third strategy is to develop Cicero-powered solutions that address specific business challenges. These solutions such as our CTI Integrator not only addresses specific integration services as architecture planning, technologyproblems but also provides us with an opportunity to cross sell Cicero® software for future integration.

36


Products

Desktop Integration Segment

Cicero®. Cicero® software integrates disparate applications regardless of the platform, enables rapid development of effective, simple-to-maintain composite applications, accelerates time to value and deploys cost-effective, "best-of-breed" business solutions by leveraging existing IT investments. Cicero® helps the architect maintain consistent integration project design and business workflow improvement, allows us to focusimplementation by providing extensible, standardized methods for interacting with Windows applications, COM objects, web pages, commercial software packages, legacy applications, and Java applications among others. Cicero® can integrate applications running on core application system needsthe server or desktop, giving the architect complete flexibility in determining where, when, and how Cicero best addresses them, while our partners will surround theapplication integration occurs. Cicero® can also be used to capture and aggregate data from many different applications, apply business rules as needed, such as data transformation rules, and share that data bi-directionally via a composite view. An event in one application can cause processing in another unrelated application, even if these were implemented using differing technologies, such as Windows and Java.

The patented Cicero® software technology, with appropriate industry and business knowledge. o LEVERAGE OUR IN-HOUSE EXPERTISE IN THE CICERO SOFTWARE. Merrill Lynch originally developed Cicero internally for use by approximately 30,000 professionals worldwide. To approach the market from a position of strength, we have added members of the Merrill Lynch development team to our Cicero development team. We recruited and hired Anthony Pizi, First Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Merrill Lynch's Private Technology's Architecture and Service Quality Group, and the Cicero project director as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer as well as several of the primary Cicero engineersexclusively licensed from Merrill Lynch, consists of several components, including the following: The Resource Manager, which manages the starting, stopping, and status of applications; the Event Manager, a Component Object Model (COM)-based messaging service; the Context Manager which administers the “publish and subscribe” protocols; and a Graphical User Interface (GUI) manager which allows applications to supportbe presented to the user in one or more flexible formats selected by the user organization. In 2004, we released a version of the Cicero® product which included our ongoingnewly developed Cicero development efforts. o UTILIZE MARKET ANALYSES TO DEMONSTRATE TANGIBLE RETURN-ON-INVESTMENT RESULTS. Most contact centers benchmarkStudio integration tool, to allow applications to be integrated using point-and-click methods. Cicero® incorporates an Application Bus with code modules to handle the inter-application connections. There are additional tools that provide ancillary functions for the integrator including tools to debug, view history and trace logs.

Cicero Studio provides a nontraditional approach to application integration. By providing a high level of object-oriented integration, Cicero Studio eliminates the need for source code modification. It includes high-level integration objects, called genes (which translate disparate application interface protocols to one common interface used by Cicero software), an event processor, a context manager and a publish-subscribe information bus that enables applications to share data. It also includes a set of integration wizards that greatly simplify the task of application integration.

Cicero Studio is a powerful integration tool that eliminates most of the technical complexity associated with application integration. Integrators avoid the high cost and complexity of invasive code modifications and extend the scope of their operationalintegration capabilities into new and services levels against established industry norms. Metrics suchlegacy environments. Cicero Studio provides an open architecture that can be extended to incorporate new behaviors by adding genes and communicating with COM objects. This enables Cicero® software to be extended to accommodate new platforms and interface requirements as average waiting timeneeded and provides a rich paradigm for evolving integration behaviors over time. It also means that Cicero software can be implemented in both the call queue, call abandonment rates, after call service workdesktop and percentagen-tier server of one-call completion are typically measured against norms and trends. We believe that use of Cicero will provide tangible, demonstrable improvements to these metrics. 23 PRODUCTS DESKTOP INTEGRATION SEGMENT PRODUCTS - CICERO Ciceroa service-oriented architecture.

Cicero® software runs on Windows NT,Vista, Windows XP, and Windows 2000 to organize applications underin a book-chapter-section metaphorflexible graphical configuration that keeps all the application functionality that the user needs within easy reach. For instance, selecting the "memo"

37


“memo” tab might cause a Microsoft Word memo-template to be created within the CiceroCicero® desktop. The end-user need not even know that they are using Microsoft Word. Moreover, a customer-tracking database can be linked with a customer relationship management software package. Virtually any application that is used in a customer contact center can be integrated under the Cicero book-chapter metaphor and be used in conjunction with other contact center applications. The patented Cicero

Cicero® software technology as exclusively licensed from Merrill Lynch, consists of several components: The Event Manager, a Component Object Model (COM)-based messaging service; The Context Manager, which administers the "publish and subscribe" protocols; The Shell Script Interpreter, which supports communication with applications that do not support the required COM interfaces; and The Resource Manager, which starts and shuts down applications and ensures recovery from system errors. The system incorporates an application bus with underlying mechanisms to handle the inter-application connections. Cicero provides non-intrusive integration of desktop and web applications, portals, third-party business tools, and even legacy mainframe and client server applications, so all co-exist and share their information seamlessly. Cicero'sCicero’s® non-invasive technology means that clients don'tdon’t risk modifying either fragile source code or sensitive application program interfaces - and they can easily integrate off-the-shelf products and emerging technologies. Cicero

Cicero® software allows end-users to access applications in the most efficient way possible, by only allowing them to use the relevant portions of that application. For instance, a contact center customer service representative doesmay not use 90% of the functionality of Microsoft Word, but might need access to a memorandum and other custom designed forms as well as basic editing functionality. CiceroCicero® can be set to control access to only those templates and, in a sense, turn-off the unused functionality by not allowing the end-user direct access to the underlying application. Under the same CiceroCicero® implementation, however, a different CiceroCicero® configuration could allow the employees in the Marketing department full access to Word because they have need of the full functionality. The functionality of the applications that CiceroCicero® integrates can be modulated by the business goals of the ultimate client, the parent company. This ability to limit user access to certain functions within applications enables companies to reduce their training burden by limiting the portions of the applications on which they are required to train their customer service representatives. Cicero

Cicero® is an ideal product for large customer contact centers. We believe that Cicero,Cicero®, by combining ease of use, a shorter learning curve and consistent presentation of information will allow our clients to leverage their exiting investments in Customer Relationship Management or CRM applications and further increase customer services, productivity, return on investment and decrease cost both per seat and across the contact center. MESSAGING AND APPLICATION ENGINEERING SEGMENT PRODUCTS - GENEVA INTEGRATION BROKER Geneva Integration Broker is a transport independent

Messaging and Application Engineering Segment

Ensuredmail. Our Ensuredmail products provide encrypted email capabilities such as security, proof-of-delivery and non-repudiation of origination. The recipient of an Ensuredmail message broker that enables an organization to rapidly integrate diverse business systems regardless of platform, transport, format or protocol. The key feature of Geneva Integration Broker is its support for XML and other standards for open data exchange on the Internet. The product provides a robust platform for building eBusiness applications that integrate with existing back-office systems. Geneva Integration Broker's support for open data exchange and secure Internet transports make it an excellent platform for building Internet-based business-to-business solutions. Geneva Integration Broker does not representneed to be an Ensuredmail licensee or install software. When an Ensuredmail user sends a significant portionmessage to another user, the recipient receives an email message with an attached encrypted message. The recipient opens the attached, which starts their web browser, enters a password, and can read the message and attachments. If the recipient replies to the message, the message is fully encrypted and sent back securely to the original sender. Organizations typically use our server-based Ensuredmail products, whereas individuals can use a person-to-person desktop variation.

Ensuredmail is FIPS140-1 certified, and in use by agencies of the Company's current business or prospects. SERVICES Federal Government, in addition to private sector organizations.

Services
We provide a full spectrum of technical support, training and consulting services across all of our operating segments as part of our commitment to providing our customers industry-leading business integration solutions. Our services organization is staffed by experts in the field of systems integration with backgrounds in development, consulting, and business process reengineering. In addition, our services professionals have substantial industry specific backgrounds with extraordinary depth in our focus marketplace of financial services. 24 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT

Maintenance and Support
We offer customers varying levels of technical support tailored to their needs, including periodic software upgrades, and telephone supportsupport. Cicero® and twenty-four hour, seven days a week access to support-related information via the Internet. Cicero isEnsuredmail software are frequently used in mission-critical business situations, and our maintenance and support services are accustomed to the critical demands that must be meetmet to deliver world-class service to our clients. Many of the members of our staff have expertise in lights-out mission critical environments and are ready to deliver service commensurate with those unique client needs. TRAINING SERVICES

Training Services
Our training organization offers a full curriculum of courses and labs designed to help customers become proficient in the use of our products and related technology as well as enabling customers to take full advantage of our field-tested

38


best practices and methodologies. Our training organization seeks to enable client organizations to gain the proficiency needed in our products for full client self-sufficiency but retains the flexibility to tailor their curriculum to meet specific needs of our clients. CONSULTING SERVICES

Consulting Services
We offer consulting services around our product offerings in project management, applications and platform integration, application design and development and application renewal, along with expertise in a wide variety of development environments and programming languages. We also have an active partner program in which we recruit leading IT consulting and system integration firms to provide services for the design, implementation and deployment of our customer contact center solutions. Our consulting organization supports third party consultants by providing architectural and enabling services. CUSTOMERS Approximately 30,000
Customers

Our customers include both end-users to whom we sell our products and services directly and distributors and other intermediaries who either resell our products to end-users or incorporate our products into their own product offerings. Typical end-users of our products and services are large businesses with sophisticated technology requirements for contact centers, in the financial services, insurance and telecommunications industries, and intelligence, security, law enforcement and other governmental organizations.

Our customers are using our solutions to rapidly deploy applications. Some examples of customers' uses of our products include:

·
Business Process Outsourcers - use our Cicero® solution in contact centers to provide real time integration among existing back-office systems, eliminate redundant data entry, shorten call times, provide real-time data access and enhance customer service and service levels.

·
A financial institution - uses our Cicero® solution to provide real-time integration among market data, customer account information, existing back-office systems and other legacy applications, eliminate redundant data entry, provide real-time data access and processing, and enhance customer service and service levels.

·
An insurance company - uses our Cicero® solution to integrate their customer information systems with over thirty software applications including a CRM application.

·
A law enforcement organization - uses our Cicero® solution to streamline and automate support for arrests and investigations while merging federal, state and local systems within a unified process.

Other customers are systems integrators, which use our Cicero® product to develop integration solutions for their customers.

More than 6,000 Merrill Lynch personnel are currently using the Cicero technology.Cicero® software. We licensed the CiceroCicero® technology from Merrill Lynch during 2000 and have developedenhanced it to initially selllicense to contact centers and the contact center industry.financial services, insurance and telecommunications industries, as well as the intelligence, security, law enforcement and other governmental organizations. Our significant customers include Merrill Lynch, Nationwide Financial Services, Arvato Services, a division of Bertelsmann A.G.,IBM, N.E.W. Customer Service Companies and the West Windsor Township, New Jersey Police Department.

In 2004, Bank of America, Convergys, IBM, Nationwide Financial Services and Gateway Electronic Medical Management Systems (GEMMS). Merrill Lynch holds approximately three percent (3%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock. No one customerSAIC each accounted for more than ten percent (10%) of our operating revenues in 2001. Bankrevenue. In 2005, NEW Customer Service Companies and Innovative System Solutions Corporation accounted for more than ten percent (10%) of Americaour operating revenue. Merrill Lynch, N.E.W. Customer Service Companies, IBM, and Nationwide FinancialPilar Services, individuallyInc. each accounted for more than ten percent (10%) of our operating revenues in 2002. In 2003, Bank of America, Nationwide Financial Services,2006.

Sales and Gateway Electronic Medical Management Systems (GEMMS) each accounted for more than ten percent (10%) of our operating revenues SALES AND MARKETING SALES Marketing

Sales

An important element of our sales strategy is to expandsupplement our direct sales force by expanding our relationships

39


with third parties to increase market awareness and acceptance of our business integration software solutions. As part of these relationships, we willcontinue to jointly sell and implement Cicero software solutions with strategic partners such as systems integrators and embed Cicero along with other products through OEMReseller relationships. We will provide training and other support necessary to systems integrators and OEMsResellers to aid in the promotion of our products. To date we have signed partner agreementsentered into strategic partnerships with the following resellers, for integrated business solutions: ThinkCentric, Hewlett Packard and House of Code, Titan Systems Corporation,Code. In addition, we have entered into strategic partnerships with Silent Systems, Inc., ArvatoADPI LLC, and Pilar Services, Inc. These organizations have relationships with existing customers or have access to organizations requiring top secret or classified access. In addition, several of these partners can bundle Cicero® with other software to provide a divisioncomprehensive solution to customers. We are not materially dependent on any of Bertelsmann A.G, GEMMS, FI Systems Italia S.r.L. and Centrix Communications Services S.p.A. 25 MARKETING these organizations. Generally, our agreements with such partners provide for price discounts based on their sales volume, with no minimum required volume.

Marketing

The target market for our products and services are large companies providingoperating contact centers and in the financial services, insurance and or customer relationship management to a large existing customer base.telecommunications industries, as well as users in the intelligence, security and law enforcement communities and other governmental organizations. Increasing competitiveness and consolidation is driving companies in such businesses to increase the efficiency and quality of their customer contact centers. As a result, customer contact centers are compelled by both economic necessity and internal mandates to find ways to increase internal efficiency, increase customer satisfaction, increase effective cross-selling, decrease staff turnover cost and leverage their investment in current information technology.
Our marketing staff has an in-depth understanding of the financial services customer contact center software marketplace and the needs of these customers, in that marketplace, as well as experience in all of the key marketing disciplines. The staffThey also has broadhave knowledge of our productsthe financial services industry and servicesgovernment organizations that have focused on application integration solutions to address needs in mergers and how they can meet customer needs. acquisitions and homeland security.
Core marketing functions include product marketing, marketing communications and strategic alliances. We utilize focused marketing programs that are intended to attract potential customers in our target vertical industries and to promote Level 8our company and our brands. Our marketing programs are specifically directed at our target market such asmarkets, and include speaking engagements, public relations campaigns, focused trade shows and web site marketing, while devoting substantial resources to supporting the field sales team with high quality sales tools and collateral.ancillary material. As product acceptance grows and our target markets increase, we will shift to broader marketing programs.
The marketing department also produces collateralancillary material for presentation or distribution to prospects, including demonstrations, presentation materials, white papers, case studies, articles, brochures, and data sheets. We also intend to implement a high level strategic partnership program to educate

Research and support our partners with a variety of programs, incentives and support plans. As part of our increased focus on the Cicero product line and initially the financial services customer contact center market, we have significantly decreased our marketing costs while increasing our marketing focus. We intend to continue to fine-tune our sales and marketing staff through continued training to meet our revised needs. We have decreased the marketing and sales budget to conserve financial resources and appropriately direct expenditures in line with our revised business strategy RESEARCH AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Product Development
In connection with the narrowing of our strategic focus, and in light of the sale of our Systems Integration products, we have experienced an overall reduction in research and development costs. Since CiceroCicero® is a new product in a relatively untapped market, it is imperative to constantly enhance the feature sets and functionality of the product.

We incurred research and development expense of approximately $1,000, $1,900,$532,700, $891,000 and $5,400,$1,111,000 in 2003, 2002,2006, 2005 and 2001,2004, respectively. The decrease in researchcosts reflects the reduction in headcount by two employees plus associated overheads in 2006 and development coststwo employees, plus associated overheads in 2003 as compared with 2002 is the result of the impact of the closing of the Berkeley, California facility in June 2002. The decrease in research and development costs in 2002 is related to the sale of the Geneva AppBuilder line of business in October 2001. Approximately 100 employees, including the Geneva AppBuilder software development group, were transferred to the purchaser at that time. The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and short product life cycles. Our future success will depend to a substantial degree upon our ability to enhance our existing products and to develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products and features that meet changing customer requirements and emerging and evolving industry standards. 2005.

Our budgets for research and development are based on planned product introductions and enhancements. Actual expenditures, however, may significantly differ from budgeted expenditures. Inherent in the product development process are a number of risks. The development of new, technologically advanced software products is a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation, as well as the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends.

Competition

The introduction of new or enhanced products also requires us to manage the transition from older productsmarkets in order to minimize disruption in customer ordering patterns, as well as ensure that adequate supplies of new products can be delivered to meet customer demand. There can be no assurance thatwhich we will successfully develop, introduce or manage the transition to new products. 26 We have in the past,compete are highly competitive and may in the future, experience delays in the introduction of our products, due to factors internal and external to our business. Any future delays in the introduction or shipment of new or enhanced products, the inability of such products to gain market acceptance or problems associated with new product transitions could adversely affect our results of operations, particularly on a quarterly basis. COMPETITION The provision of custom contact center integration software includes a large number of participants in various segments, is subject to rapid changes, and is highly competitive.change. These markets are highly fragmented and served by numerous firms,firms. We believe that the competitive factors affecting the markets for our products and services include:

40


·Product functionality and features;

·Availability and quality of support services;

·Ease of product implementation;

·Price;

·Product reputation; and

·Our financial stability.

The relative importance of each of these factors depends upon the specific customer environment. Although we believe that our products and services can compete favorably, we may not be able to increase our competitive position against current and potential competitors. In addition, many of which address onlycompanies choose to deploy their own information technology personnel or utilize system integrators to write new code or rewrite existing applications in an effort to develop integration solutions. As a result, prospective customers may decide against purchasing and implementing externally developed and produced solutions such as ours.

We compete with companies that utilize varying approaches to modernize, web-enable and integrate existing software applications:

·Portal software offers the ability to aggregate information at a single point, but not the ability to integrate transactions from a myriad of information systems on the desktop. Plumtree is a representative company in the market.

·Middleware software provides integration of applications through messages and data exchange implemented typically in the middle tier of the application architecture. This approach requires modification of the application source code and substantial infrastructure investments and operational expense. Reuters, TIBCO and IBM MQSeries are competitors in the middleware market.

·CRM software offers application tools that allow developers to build product specific interfaces and custom applications. This approach is not designed to be product neutral and is often dependent on deep integration with our technology. Siebel is a representative product in the CRM software category.

·Recently, there have been several companies that offer capabilities similar to our Cicero software in that these companies advertise that they integrate applications without modifying the underlying code for those applications. OpenSpan is one company who advertises that they can non-invasively integrate at the point of contact or on the desktop.

Other competitors include Above All Software, Attachmate Corporation, Seagull Software Ltd. and Oracle. Our Cicero® product competes directly with other contact center problems and solutions. Clients may elect to use their internal information systems resources to satisfy their needs, rather than using thosesolutions offered by Level 8. The rapid growthMicrosoft, Corizon and long-term potential of the market for business integration solutions to the contact centers of the financial services industry make it an attractive market for new competition.Jacada. We expect additional competition from other established and emerging companies. Furthermore, our competitors may combine with each other, or other companies may enter our markets by acquiring or entering into strategic relationships with our competitors. Many of our current and possible future competitors have greater name recognition, a larger installed customer base and greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we have. REPRESENTATIVE COMPETITORS FOR CICERO o Portal software offers the ability to aggregate information at a single point, but not the ability to integrate transactions from a myriad of information systems on the desktop. Plumtree is a representative company in the Portal market. o Middleware software provides integration of applications through messages and data exchange implemented typically in the middle tier of the application architecture. This approach requires modification of the application source code and substantial infrastructure investments and operational expense. Reuters, TIBCO and IBM MQSeries are representative products in the middleware market. o CRM software offers application tools that allow developers to build product specific interfaces and custom applications. This approach is not designed to be product neutral and is often dependent on deep integration with the company's CRM technology. Siebel is a representative product in the CRM software category. We believe that our ability to compete depends in part on a number of competitive factors outside our control, including the ability of our competitors to hire, retain and motivate senior project managers, the ownership by competitors of software used by potential clients, the development by others of software that is competitive with our products and services, the price at which others offer comparable services and the extent of our competitors' responsiveness to customer needs. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Intellectual Property
Our success is dependent upon developing, protecting and maintaining our intellectual property assets. We rely upon combinations of copyright, trademark and trade secrecy protections, along with contractual provisions, to protect our intellectual property rights in software, documentation, data models, methodologies, data processing systems and related written materials in the international marketplace. In addition, Merrill Lynch holds a patent with respect to the CiceroCicero® technology. Copyright protection is generally available under United States laws and international treaties for our software and printed materials. The effectiveness of these various types of protection can be limited, however, by

41


variations in laws and enforcement procedures from country to country. We use the registered trademarks "Level 8 Systems"“Cicero®” and "Cicero", and the trademarks "Level 8", "Level 8 Technologies", and "Geneva Integration Broker"“Ensuredmail”.

All other product and company names mentioned herein are for identification purposes only and are the property of, and may be trademarks of, their respective owners. There can be no assurance that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology, and such protections do not preclude competitors from developing products with functionality or features similar to our products. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that third parties will not independently develop competing technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies. Additionally, with respect to the Cicero line of products, there can be no assurance that Merrill Lynch will protect its patents or that we will have the resources to successfully pursue infringers. 27 Although we do not believe that our products infringe the proprietary rights of any third parties, there can be no assurance that infringement claims will not be asserted against our customers or us in the future. In addition, we may be required to indemnify our distribution partners and end users for similar claims made against them. Furthermore, we may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to establish the validity of our proprietary rights. Litigation, either as a plaintiff or defendant, would cause us to incur substantial costs and divert management resources from productive tasks whether or not said litigation is resolved in our favor, which could have a material adverse effect on our business operating results and financial condition. As the number of software products in the industry increases and the functionality of these products further overlaps, we believe that software developers and licensors may become increasingly subject to infringement claims. Any such claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming and expensive to defend and could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. EMPLOYEES
Employees
As of MarchDecember 31, 2004,2006, we employed 3318 employees. Our employees are not represented by a union or a collective bargaining agreement.
We believe that to fully implement our business plan we will be required to enhance our ability to work with the Microsoft Windows NT,Vista, Windows XP, and Windows 2000 operating systems as well as the Linux operating system by adding additional development personnel as well as additional direct sales personnel to complement our sales plan. Although we believe that we will be successful in attracting and retaining qualified employees to fill these positions, no assurance can be given that we will be successful in attracting and retaining these employees now or in the future.
PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters is located in approximately 4,8821,300 square feet of office space in Princeton,Farmingdale, New Jersey, pursuant to a lease expiring in 2006. The United Statesmonth-to-month sublease from one of our resellers. Our operations group and administrative functions are based in offices of approximately 2,956 square feet in our Cary, North Carolina office pursuant to a lease expiring in 2006.2007. The research and development and customer support groups are located in the Princeton,Farmingdale, New Jersey and Cary, North Carolina facilities.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Various lawsuits and claims have been brought against the Companyus in the normal course of our business. In January 2003, an action was brought against the Companyus in the Circuit Court of Loudon County, Virginia, for a breach of a real estate lease. The case was settled in August 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Companywe agreed to assign a note receivable with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the note should the note obligor default on future payments. The unpaid balance of the note was $545$545,000, of which the current unpaid principal portion is approximately $123,000 and it matures in December 2007. TheAt the maturity date of the note, the Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions usingwill be liable for additional payments totaling approximately $31,000 which we have recognized as a weighted probability cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131. non-current liability.

In October 2003, the Company waswe were served with a summons and complaint in Superior Court of North Carolina regarding unpaid invoices for services rendered by one of itsour subcontractors. The amount in dispute iswas approximately $200$200,000 and is included in accounts payable. Subsequent to March 31, 2004, the Companywe settled this litigation. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Companywe agreed to pay a total of $189$189,000 plus interest over a nineteen month19-month period ending November 15, 2005. The Company is in the process of negotiating a series of payments for the remaining liability of approximately $80,000.

In March 2004, the Company waswe were served with a summons and complaint in Superior Court of North Carolina regarding a security deposit for a sublease in Virginia. The amount in dispute is approximately $247.$247,000. In October 2004, we reached a settlement agreement wherein we agreed to pay $160,000 over a 36-month period ending October 2007.

In August 2004, we were notified that we were in default under an existing lease agreement for office facilities in Princeton, New Jersey. The amount of the default is approximately $65,000. Under the terms of the lease agreement, we may be liable for future rents should the space remain vacant. We have reached a settlement agreement with the landlord which calls for a total payment of $200,000 over a 36-month period ending October 2007.

In October 2005, we were notified that Critical Mass Mail, Inc. had filed a claim against us for failure to pay certain liabilities under an Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 9, 2004. We in turn filed that Critical Mass Mail, Inc. failed to deliver certain assets and other documents under the same Asset purchase agreement. We had already reserved the

42


potential liability under the Agreement as part of the asset purchase accounting. In February, 2006, Critical Mass Mail amended their complaint and is seeking damages of approximately $600,000 for our failure to timely register the underlying securities issued in the Asset Purchase. In November 2006, we negotiated a settlement with Critical Mass Mail that provided for monthly payments of the amounts already accrued. In December 2006 we settled the second complaint and agreed to issue $50,000 worth of the Company’s common stock. The Company disagrees withhas recorded stock compensation expense as of December 31, 2006 in this allegation although it has reserved for this contingency. amount.

Under the indemnification clause of the Company'sCompany’s standard reseller agreements and software license agreements, the Company agrees to defend the reseller/licensee against third party claims asserting infringement by the Company'sCompany’s products of certain intellectual property rights, which may include patents, copyrights, trademarks or trade secrets, and to pay any judgments entered on such claims against the reseller/licensee. 28 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS GENERAL INFORMATION Level 8 Systems

43


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations

General Information

Cicero Inc is a global provider of business integration software that enables organizations to integrate new and existing information and processes at the desktop with our CiceroCicero® software product. Business integration software addresses the emerging need for a company's information systems to deliver enterprise-wide views of the company's business information processes. We also provide email encryption products that address information and security compliance from the individual to the enterprise.

In addition to software products, Level 8we also providesprovide technical support, training and consulting services as part of itsour commitment to providing itsour customers industry-leading integration solutions. Level 8'sOur consulting team has in-depth experience in developing successful enterprise-class solutions as well as valuable insight into the business information needs of customers in the Global 5000. Level 8 offersWe offer services around itsour integration and encryption software products.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, research and development activities, liquidity and capital resources and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of factors could cause its actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company's forward-looking statements. See "Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements." The Company's results of operations include the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries from the date of acquisition. During 2002, the Company identified the assets of the Systems Integration segment as being held for sale and thus a discontinued operation. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities have been reclassified to assets held for sale and the results of operations of that segment are now reclassified as loss from discontinued operations. In August 2000, the Company acquired the rights to Cicero, a comprehensive integrated desktop computer environment from Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch") in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of its common stock valued at $22,750. The cost of the technology acquired had been capitalized and amortized over a three-year period. In January 2002, the Company extended the exclusive perpetual license to develop and sell the Cicero application integration software from Merrill Lynch. Due to the Company's acquisition and divestiture activities, year-to-year comparisons of results of operations are not necessarily meaningful. Additionally, as a result of the Company's pursuit of a growth strategy focusing on its software product sales and synergies gained as a result of eliminating duplicative functions, the results of operations are significantly different than the result of combining the previous operations of each acquired company into Level 8. Pro forma comparisons are therefore not necessarily meaningful. In 2001, the Company began to shift its primary focus from selling multiple Enterprise Application Integration ("EAI") products to selling Cicero, a desktop integration package, to the financial services industry with a decreased focus on services. During the last two fiscal quarters of 2001, the Company sold most of the products that comprised its Messaging and Application Engineering segment. In 2002, the Company continued to reorganize and concentrate on the emerging desktop integration market and continued to dispose of non-strategic assets with the sale of the Star SQL and CTRC products from the Messaging and Application Engineering segment and the Geneva Enterprise Integrator and “Risk Factors'' page 3.

Business Process Automator from what was formerly the Systems Integration segment. BUSINESS STRATEGY During the second quarter of 2001, management reassessed how the Company would be managed and how resources would be allocated. At that time management then madeStrategy

Management makes operating decisions and assessedassesses performance of the Company'sCompany’s operations based on the following reportable segments: (1) Desktop Integration (2) System Integration and (3)(2) Messaging and Application Engineering. Previous reportable segments were: (1) software, (2) maintenance, (3) services, and (4) research and development. As noted above, the assets comprising the System Integration segment were identified as being held for resale and accordingly, the results of operations have been reclassified to gain or loss from a discontinued business and no segment information is presented. 29

The principal product in the Desktop Integration segment is Cicero. Cicerocomprised of the Cicero® product. Cicero® is a business integration software product that maximizes end-user productivity, streamlines business operations and integrates disparate systems and applications. applications, while renovating or rejuvenating older legacy systems by making them usable in the business processes.
The productsproduct that comprisecomprises the Messaging and Application Engineering segment were Geneva Integration Broker, Geneva Message Queuing, Geneva XIPC and Geneva AppBuilder. Geneva Integration Broker is a transport independent message broker that enables an organization to rapidly integrate diverse business systems regardless of platform, transport, format or protocol. Geneva Message QueuingEnsuredmail. Ensuredmail is an enterprise connectivity product for Microsoft and non-Microsoft applications. The primary use is for transactional, once and only once connectivityencrypted email technology that can reside on either the server or the desktop.

Results of Window-based Web applications to back-office information resources like mainframes and other legacy systems. Geneva XIPC provides similar delivery of information between applications. While Geneva Message Queuing is based around a Microsoft standard, Geneva XIPC is for use with Linux and other brands of UNIX operating systems. Geneva AppBuilder is a set of application engineering tools that assists customers in developing, adapting and managing enterprise-wide computer applications for the Internet/intranets and client/server networks. On October 1, 2001, the Company completed the sale of its Geneva AppBuilder product. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company sold the rights, title and interest in the Geneva AppBuilder product along with all receivables, unbilled and deferred revenues as well as all maintenance contracts. The Geneva AppBuilder product accounted for approximately 85% of total revenue within the Messaging and Application Engineering segment and approximately 99% of total revenue for all segments. As more fully described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company received approximately $19 million in cash plus a note receivable for $1 million due February 2002. The Company subsequently liquidated $22 million of its short-term debt using the proceeds received and cash on hand. As part of the sale transaction, approximately 100 employees were transferred over to the acquiring company who also assumed certain facility and operating leases and entered into a sublease arrangement at the Cary, North Carolina facility. While future revenues have been negatively impacted by the sale of Geneva AppBuilder, the associated costs of doing business have been positively impacted by the overall reduction in operating costs. During the quarter ended September 30, 2001, the Company sold two of its messaging products - Geneva Message Queuing and Geneva XIPC to Envoy Technologies, Inc. for $50 in cash and a note receivable for $400. Under the terms of the agreement, Envoy acquired all rights, title and interest to the products along with all customer and maintenance contracts. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Operations

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the Company's results of continuing operations expressed as a percentage of revenue. 30
THREE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31, ----------------------- --------- 2003 2002 2001 2004 2003 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Revenue: Software ........................ 19.3% 48.1% 9.6% 12.0% 25.2% Maintenance ..................... 59.6% 18.4% 53.3% 88.0% 58.0% Services ........................ 21.1% 33.5% 37.1% 0.0% 16.8% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total ................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of revenue: Software ........................ 783.4% 238.5% 85.3% 866.3% 585.3% Maintenance ..................... 70.4% 5.8% 18.7% 125.3% 64.3% Services ........................ 171.3% 29.0% 31.6% 337.3% 175.5% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total ................... 1,025.1% 273.3% 135.6% 1,328.9% 825.2% Gross margin (loss) ................. (925.1)% (173.3)% (35.6)% (1,228.9)% (725.2)% Operating expenses: Sales and marketing ............. 317.0% 90.6% 63.6% 403.6% 385.3% Research and product development 191.9% 61.3% 30.9% 375.9% 176.9% General and administrative ...... 482.6% 126.9% 55.5% 567.5% 548.2% Amortization of intangible assets 0.0% 0.0% 36.1% 0.0% 0.0% Impairment of intangible assets . 0.0% 0.0% 45.7% 707.2% 0.0% (Gain)/loss on disposal of assets 78.3% 14.9% (36.6)% 0.0% 340.6% Restructuring, net .............. (157.4)% 41.9% 49.8% 0.0% 0.0% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total ................... 912.4% 335.6% 245.0% 2,054.2% 1,451.0% Loss from operations ............ (1,837.5)% (508.9)% (280.6)% (3,283.1)% (2,176.2)% Other income (expense), net ..... (25.5)% 80.1% (51.0)% 118.0% 96.5% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Loss before taxes ............... (1,863.0)% (428.8)% (331.6)% (3,165.1)% (2,079.7)% Income tax provision (benefit) .. 0.0% (5.0)% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Loss from continuing operations ..... (1,863.0)% (423.8)% (334.5)% (3,165.1)% (2,079.7)% Loss from discontinued operations ... (24.9)% (162.5)% (271.2)% (10.8)% (32.2)% ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net loss ........................ (1,887.9)% (586.3)% (605.7)% (3,175.9)% (2,111.9)% ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========

  
Year Ended December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Revenue:       
Software  21.4% 51.9% 30.8%
Maintenance  12.3% 18.7% 39.5%
Services  66.3% 29.4% 29.7%
Total  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
           
Cost of revenue:          
Software  0.9% 2.0% 577.8%
Maintenance  21.8% 44.6% 49.3%
Services  56.2% 104.7% 131.0%
Total  78.9% 151.3% 758.1%
           
Gross margin (loss)  21.1% (51.3)% (658.1)%

44

        
Operating expenses:       
Sales and marketing  35.6% 79.9% 140.4%
Research and product development  54.8% 113.5% 143.3%
General and administrative  124.1% 144.8% 196.4%
Impairment of intangible assets  0.0% 0.0% 75.7%
(Gain) on disposal of assets  (2.5)% 0.0% (0.6)%
Total  212.0% 338.2% 555.2%
           
Loss from operations  (190.9)% (389.5)% (1,213.3)%
Other (expense), net  (117.5)% (79.4)% (42.3)%
Loss before taxes  (308.4)% (468.9)% (1,255.6)%
Income tax provision (benefit)  0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
           
Loss from continuing operations  (308.4)% (468.9)% (1,255.6)%
Loss from discontinued operations  0.0% 0.0% (3.9)%
Net loss  (308.4)% (468.9)% (1,259.5)%

The following table sets forth data for total revenue for continuing operations by geographic origin as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 2002 2001 2004 2003 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- United States 90% 96% 36% 94% 85% Europe ...... 9% 4% 55% 6% 15% Asia Pacific -- -- 3% -- -- Middle East . -- -- 4% -- -- Other ....... 1% -- 2% -- -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Total .... 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 31

  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
United States  100% 100% 98%
Europe  --  --  2%
Total  100% 100% 100%

The table below presentspresent’s information about reported segments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, 20022006, 2005, and 2001: MESSAGING/ DESKTOP APPLICATION INTEGRATION ENGINEERING TOTAL ----------- ----------- ----- 2003: Total revenue ................ $ 466 $ 64 $ 530 Total cost of revenue ........ 5,371 62 5,433 Gross margin (loss) .......... (4,905) 2 (4,903) Total operating expenses ..... 4,999 256 5,255 Segment profitability (loss) . $ (9,904) $ (254) $(10,158) 2002: Total revenue ................ $ 2,148 $ 953 $ 3,101 Total cost of revenue ........ 6,527 1,950 8,477 Gross margin (loss) .......... (4,379) (997) (5,376) Total operating expenses ..... 8,211 434 8,645 Segment profitability (loss) . $(12,590) $ (1,431) $(14,021) 2001: Total revenue ................ $ 134 $ 17,223 $ 17,357 Total cost of revenue ........ 9,427 14,109 23,536 Gross margin (loss) .......... (9,293) 3,114 (6,179) Total operating expenses ..... 18,858 7,179 26,037 Segment profitability (loss) . $(28,151) $ (4,065) $(32,216) The table below presents information about reported segments for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003: MESSAGING/ DESKTOP APPLICATION INTEGRATION ENGINEERING TOTAL ----------- ----------- ----- 2004: Total revenue ........................ $ 77 $ 6 $ 83 Total cost of revenue ................ 1,058 45 1,103 Gross margin (loss) .................. (981) (39) (1,020) Total operating expenses ............. 988 130 1,118 Segment profitability (loss) ......... $(1,969) $ (169) $(2,138) 2003: Total revenue ........................ $ 119 $ 24 $ 143 Total cost of revenue ................ 1,138 42 1,180 Gross margin (loss) .................. (1,019) (18) (1,037) Total operating expenses ............. 1,500 88 1,588 Segment profitability (loss) ......... $(2,519) $ (106) $(2,625) 32 (in thousands):

  
For the year ended December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
  Desktop Integration Messaging and Application Engineering Total Desktop Integration Messaging and Application Engineering Total Desktop Integration Messaging and Application Engineering Total 
Total revenue $965  $7  $972    $760  $25  $785    $707  $68  $775 
Total cost of revenue  767  --  767  1,188  --  1,188  5,662  213  5,875 
Gross margin (loss)  198  7  205  (428) 25  (403) (4,955) (145) (5,100)
Total operating expenses  1,964  121  2,085  2,536  119  2,655  3,348  373  3,721 
Segment profitability (loss) $(1,766)$(114)$(1,880)$(2,964)$(94)$(3,058)$(8,303)$(518)$(8,821)

A reconciliation of segment operating expenses to total operating expense follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31, ----------------------- --------- 2003 2002 2001 2004 2003 ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (unaudited) Segment operating expenses ...... $ 5,255 $ 8,645 $ 26,037 $ 1,118 $ 1,588 Amortization of intangible assets -- -- 6,259 -- -- Write-off of intangible assets .. -- -- 7,929 587 -- (Gain)loss on disposal of assets . 415 461 (6,345) -- 487 Restructuring, net .............. (834) 1,300 8,650 -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total operating expenses ........ $ 4,836 $ 10,406 $ 42,530 $ 1,705 $ 2,075 ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
follows (numbers are in thousands):
  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Segment operating expenses $2,085 $2,655 $3,721 
Write-off of intangible assets  --  
--
  587 
(Gain) on disposal of assets  (24) 
--
  (5)
Total operating expenses $2,061 $2,655 $4,303 


45


A reconciliation of total segment profitability to net loss as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, ----------------------- ---------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 2004 2003 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- (unaudited) Total segment profitability (loss) ....... $(10,158) $(14,021) $(32,216) $ (2,138) $ (2,625) Amortization of intangible assets ........ -- -- (6,259) -- -- Impairment of intangible assets .......... -- -- (7,929) (587) -- Gain/(loss) on disposal of assets ........ (415) (461) 6,345 -- (487) Restructuring ............................ 834 (1,300) (8,650) -- -- Interest and other income/(expense), net . (135) 2,485 (8,850) 98 138 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net loss before provision for income taxes $ (9,874) $(13,297) $(57,559) $ (2,627) $ (2,974) ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
COMPARISON OF QUARTER ENDED MARCHfor the fiscal years ended December 31 2004 TO MARCH(in thousands):

  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Total segment profitability (loss) $(1,880)$(3,058)$(8,821)
Write-off of intangible assets  --  --  (587)
Gain on disposal of assets  24  --  5 
           
Interest and other income/(expense), net  (1,141) (623) (328)
Net loss before provision for income taxes $(2,997)$(3,681)$(9,731)


Years Ended December 31, 2003 REVENUE AND GROSS MARGIN.2006, 2005, and 2004

Revenue and Gross Margin. The Company has three categories of revenue: software products, maintenance, and services. Software products revenue is comprised primarily of fees from licensing the Company'sour proprietary software products. Maintenance revenue is comprised of fees for maintaining, supporting, and providing periodic upgrades to the Company'sour software products. Services revenue is comprised of fees for consulting and training services related to the Company'sour software products. The Company's

Our revenues vary from quarter to quarter, due to market conditions, the budgeting and purchasing cycles of customers and the effectiveness of the Company'sour sales force. The Company typically doesWe do not have any material backlog of unfilled software orders and product revenue in any quarterperiod is substantially dependent upon orders received in that quarter. Because the Company'sour operating expenses are based on anticipated revenue levels and are relatively fixed over the short term, variations in the timing of the recognition of revenue can cause significant variations in operating results from quarterperiod to quarter.period. Fluctuations in operating results may result in volatility of the price of the Company'sour common stock.

Total revenues decreased 42%increased 24% from $785,000 in 2005 to $972,000 in 2006. Revenues increased slightly, or 1% from $775,000 in 2004 to $785,000 in 2005. The increase in revenues in 2006 is primarily due to increased labor billings from integration contracts with our professional services staff. The small increase in revenues in 2005 over 2004 reflects a change in the mix of revenues wherein license revenues increased offset by a decrease in annual maintenance revenues. Gross profit margin (loss) was 21%, (51)% and (658)%, for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

The Desktop Integration segment had a gross margin (loss) of 21% for the quarteryear ended December 31, 2006, (56)% for the year ended December 31, 2005, and (701)% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The improvement in gross margin from 2005 to 2006 reflects a reduction in professional services headcount and an overall increase in revenues. In 2004, we had recognized a final impairment of the excess of the unamortized book value of the Cicero® technology in excess of the expected net realizable value in accordance with SFAS 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed”. A charge in the amount of $2,844,000 was recorded as cost of software revenue in the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

The Messaging and Application Engineering segment gross margin for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was 100%. The gross margin (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2004 was (213%). In January 2004 we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail, a federally certified encryption software company. The total purchase price of the assets being acquired plus certain liabilities assumed was $750,000. The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on our estimates of fair value at the acquisition date. We assessed the net realizable value of the Ensuredmail software technology acquired and determined the purchase price exceeded the amounts allocated to the software technology acquired less liabilities assumed by approximately $587,000. This excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the assets acquired less liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill, and, because it was deemed impaired, charged to the Statement of Operations for the period ended March 31, 2004. We completed an assessment of the recoverability of the Ensuredmail product technology, as of June 30, 2004 from the same period in 2003. The decrease in revenues, while insignificant in total dollars, reflects the Company's inability to successfully penetrate its key markets. The Company believes that there are a number of factors that contribute including the relatively new categoryaccordance with SFAS 86, “Accounting for the product,Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed”. This assessment was completed due to our revised cash flow projections from software revenue. These revised cash flow projections did not support the environment for IT spending as well aslong-lived asset and accordingly we impaired the fragilityexcess of the Company's financial condition. Whileunamortized book value of the Company is actively pursuing strategic partners to reselltechnology in excess of the product andexpected net realizable value as of June 30, 2004. This charge, in the Company has made significant progress on displaying the product's capabilities to targeted customers, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in this endeavor. Gross margin/ (loss)amount of $154,000, was (1,229)%recorded as software amortization for the quarterperiod ended March 31, 2004 and (725)% for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. 33 SOFTWARE PRODUCTS.June 30, 2004.

46


Software Products. Software product revenue decreased from $407,000 in 2005 to $208,000 in 2006 or approximately 72%49%. Software product revenue increased approximately 70% in 20042005 from those results achieved in 2003,2004. The decrease in software revenues in 2006 is attributed to the closing of only one significant license contract during the year. We had another pilot installation in process, however, the absolute dollar changeacceptance was immaterial. not assured by December 31, 2006. In 2005, we were able to successfully deploy our software to several smaller integration engagements.

The gross margin (loss) on software products was (7,090)%96% for the quarteryears ended MarchDecember 31, 20042006 and reflects2005, respectively and (1,773)%, for the amortization of acquired software not offset by revenues. In the similar quarter in 2003, gross margin (loss) on software products was (2,225)%.year ended December 31, 2004. Cost of software revenue is composed primarily of amortization of software product technology, amortization of capitalized software costs for internally developed software, impairment of software product technology, and royalties to third parties, and to a lesser extent, production and distribution costs. The decreaseAll software costs have been fully amortized as of December 31, 2004. We licensed the Cicero® software technology and related patents on a worldwide basis from Merrill Lynch in costAugust of software2000 under a license agreement containing standard provisions and a two-year exclusivity period. On January 3, 2002, the license agreement was primarily dueamended to extend our exclusive worldwide marketing, sales and development rights to Cicero® in perpetuity (subject to Merrill Lynch’s rights to terminate in the event of bankruptcy or a change in the amortization of capitalized software from the acquisitioncontrol of the Cicero technology, which was purchasedCompany) and to grant ownership rights in the third quarterCicero® trademark. Merrill Lynch agreed to indemnify us with regard to the rights granted to us for Cicero®. Consideration for the original Cicero® license consisted of 2000.1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In exchange for the amendment, we issued an additional 250,000 shares of common stock to MLBC, Inc., a Merrill Lynch affiliate and entered into a royalty sharing agreement. Under the royalty sharing agreement, we pay a royalty of 3% of the sales price for each sale of Cicero® software or related maintenance services. The Company expectsroyalties over the life of the agreement are not payable in excess of $20 million.

The software product gross margin (loss) for the Desktop Integration segment was 96% for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and (1,950)% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The software product gross margin (loss) on the Messaging and Application Engineering segment was 100% for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and (587)% for year ended December 31, 2004.

We expect to see significant increases in software sales related to the Desktop Integration segment coupled with improving margins on software products as CiceroCicero® gains acceptance in the marketplace. The Company'sOur expectations are based on itsour review of the sales cycle that has developed around the CiceroCicero® product since being released by the Company, itsus, our review of the pipeline of prospective customers and their anticipated capital expenditure commitments and budgeting cycles, as well as the status of in-process proof of concepts or beta sites with select corporations. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment revenue is expected to increase marginally with on-line sales of its products. MAINTENANCE.

Maintenance. Maintenance revenuerevenues for the quarteryear ended MarchDecember 31, 20042006 decreased by approximately 12%18% or $10 as compared to$27,000 from 2005. Maintenance revenues for the similar quarter for 2003.year ended December 31, 2005decreased by approximately 52% or $159,000 from 2004. The decline in overall maintenance revenues in 2006 and in 2005 is primarily due to the terminationnon-renewal of one maintenance contract for the Geneva Integration BrokerCicero® product in each of those years within the Messaging and Application EngineeringDesktop Integration segment.

The Desktop Integration segment accounted for approximately 93%95% of total maintenance revenue forand the quarter. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment accounted for approximately 7%5% of total maintenance revenues. The increaserevenues in the Desktop Integration maintenance as a percentage of the total is primarily due to amortization of deferred maintenance revenues that resulted from 2003 maintenance contracts. 2006.

Cost of maintenance revenue is comprised of personnel costs and related overhead and the cost of third-party contracts for the maintenance and support of the Company'sCompany’s software products. We experienced a gross margin (loss) on maintenance products of (77)% for 2006. Gross margin (loss) on maintenance products for the quarters ended March 31,2005 and 2004 were (138)% and March 31, 2003 was (42.5)(25)%, and (10.8%), respectively. The

Maintenance revenues are expected to increase, primarily in gross margin (loss) reflects a realignment of personnel from general and administrative duties to support for product maintenance. Thethe Desktop Integration segment hadas a negative gross margin (1,274)% forresult of our expected increase in sales of the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as amortization of software costs far exceeded revenues.Cicero® product. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment also had a negative gross marginis now composed of approximately (650)% for the quarter. Maintenancenew Ensuredmail encryption technology and maintenance revenues are expected toshould increase inas the Desktop Integration segment and increase slightly in the Messaging and Application Engineering segment.product achieves market acceptance. The cost of maintenance should remain constantincrease slightly for the Desktop Integration segment and the Messaging and Application Engineering segment. SERVICES. The Company recognized zero services

Services. Services revenue for the quarteryear ended MarchDecember 31, 2004.2006 increased by approximately 179% or $413,000 over the same period in 2005. Services revenues are expected to increaserevenue for the Desktop Integration segmentyear ended December 31, 2005 were approximately the same as the Cicero product gains acceptance.in 2004. The Messaging and Application Engineering segmentincrease in service revenues should be insignificant as compared to 2005 is attributable to the majority ofpilot engagements that were incurred during the relevant products are commercial off-the-shelf applications. past two years.

47


Cost of services revenue primarily includes personnel and travel costs related to the delivery of services. Services gross margins were (946)margin (loss) was 15%, (256)%, and (341)% for the quarteryears ended March 31, 2003. SALES AND MARKETING. 2006, 2005, and 2004 respectively.

Services revenues are expected to increase for the Desktop Integration segment as the Cicero® product gains acceptance. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment service revenues will continue to be de-minimus as the new products that comprise that segment do not require substantial service oriented work.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses primarily include personnel costs for salespeople, marketing personnel, travel and related overhead, as well as trade show participation and promotional expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 39%45% or approximately $216$281,000 in 2006 and decreased by 42% or approximately $461,000 in 2005 due to a continued reduction in the Company'sour sales and marketing workforce, decreased promotional activities and a change in the sales compensation structure. Specifically, the Company reduced its headcount within sales and marketing by two employees andwe changed the compensation structure to lower fixed costs and increase variable success-based costs. 34 The Company's

Sales and marketing expenses are expected to increase as we add additional direct sales personnel and support the sales function with collateral marketing materials. Our emphasis for the sales and marketing groups will be the Desktop Integration segment. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses primarily include personnel costs for product authors, product developers and product documentation and related overhead. Research and development expense increaseddecreased by 23.3%40% or approximately $59$358,000 in the period ended March 31, 20042006 as compared to the same period2005 and decreased by 20% or $220,000 in 2003.2005 as compared to 2004. The increasedecrease in costs in 2004 reflects the additional costs of encryption technology development personnel as well as certain other costs. The Company intendsreduction in headcount by two employees plus associated overheads in 2006 and two employees, plus associated overheads in 2005.

We intend to continue to makemaking a significant investment in research and development on its Cicero product while enhancing efficiencies in this area. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of personnel costs for the executive, legal, financial, human resources, investor relations and administrative staff, related overhead, and all non-allocable corporate costs of operating the Company. General and administrative expenses for the quarteryear ended MarchDecember 31, 2004 decreased2006 increased by 39.8%6% or $313$69,000 over the same period in the prior year. The reason for the decreaseincrease in general administrative costs is primarily due to costs associated with our recapitalization plan in 2006. In fiscal 2005, general and administrative expenses decreased by 25% or $385,000 as compared to 2004. The decline in general and administrative costs in 2005 reflects the reduction of IT service staff who have been moved to add resources for customer maintenance support and an overall reductiongeneral downsizing conducted by the Company in the costs of business fees. 2005.

General and administrative expenses are expected to decrease slightly increase going forward as our revenues increase.

Write-Off of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Write-off of goodwill was $0 for the Company continuesyears ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and $587,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. During 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail, a federally certified encryption software company. The total purchase price of the assets being acquired plus certain liabilities assumed was $750,000. The purchase price was allocated to create certain efficienciesthe assets acquired and consolidations. RESTRUCTURING. Atliabilities assumed based on the Company’s estimates of fair value at the acquisition date. We assessed the net realizable value of the Ensuredmail software technology acquired and determined the purchase price exceeded the amounts allocated to the software technology acquired less liabilities assumed by approximately $587,000. This excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the assets acquired less liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill, and, because it was deemed impaired, charged to the Statement of Operations for the period ended March 31, 2003,2004. At December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, there was no remaining goodwill on our balance sheet.

Warrants Liability. We have issued warrants to Series A3 and Series B3 preferred stockholders which contain provisions that allow the Company's accrualwarrant holders to force a cash redemption for restructuring was $633, which was primarily comprised of excess facility costs and which the Company believed represented its remaining cash obligations for the restructuring changes. Subsequent to September 30, 2003, the Company settled litigation relating to these excess facilities. Accordingly, the Company reversed the restructuring balance during the fourth quarter of 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign the note receivable from the sale of Geneva to EM Software Solutions, Inc., with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the note receivable should the note obligor, EM Software Solutions, Inc., default on future payments. The unpaid principal portion of the note receivable assigned was approximately $463 and matures December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a probability weighted cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131. CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF WARRANT LIABILITY. The Company has recorded a warrant liability for derivatives in accordance with EITF 00-19 for its common stock warrants with redemption featuresevents outside the control of the Company.our control. The fair value of the warrants is accounted for as of March 31, 2004 has been determined using valuation techniques consistent with the valuation performed asa liability and is re-measured at each balance sheet date. As of December 31, 20032006 and recorded as a warrant liability. As a result of the valuation, the Company has recorded a reduction in the fair value ofDecember 31, 2005, the warrant liability had a fair market value of $19. PROVISION FOR TAXES. The Company's$0.

Provision for Taxes. Our effective income tax rate for continuing operations differs from the statutory rate primarily because an income tax benefit was not recorded for the net loss incurred in the first quarter of 20042006, 2005, or 2003.2004. Because of the Company's recurring losses, the deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. SEGMENT PROFITABILITY. Segment profitability represents loss before income taxes, interest and other income (expense), amortization of goodwill, restructuring charges, gain (loss) on sale of assets, and impairment charges. Segment profitability for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was approximately ($2,100) as compared to ($2,600) for the same period of the previous year. The decrease in the loss before income taxes, interest and other income and expense, restructuring charges, gain or loss on sale of assets and impairment charges is primarily attributable to the reduced operations of the Company as a result of the significant restructuring of operations. Segment profitability is not a measure of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and should not be considered as a substitute for net income, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. We have included information concerning segment profitability as one measure of our cash flow and historical ability to service debt and because we believe investors find this information useful. Segment profitability as defined herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. IMPACT OF INFLATION. Inflation has not had a significant effect on the Company's operating results during the periods presented. 35 COMPARISON OF YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002, AND 2001 REVENUE AND GROSS MARGIN. The Company has three categories of revenue: software products, maintenance, and services. Software products revenue is comprised primarily of fees from licensing the Company's proprietary software products. Maintenance revenue is comprised of fees for maintaining, supporting, and providing periodic upgrades to the Company's software products. Services revenue is comprised of fees for consulting and training services related to the Company's software products. The Company's revenues vary from quarter to quarter, due to market conditions, the budgeting and purchasing cycles of customers and the effectiveness of the Company's sales force. The Company typically does not have any material backlog of unfilled software orders and product revenue in any period is substantially dependent upon orders received in that quarter. Because the Company's operating expenses are based on anticipated revenue levels and are relatively fixed over the short term, variations in the timing of the recognition of revenue can cause significant variations in operating results from period to period. Fluctuations in operating results may result in volatility of the price of the Company's common stock. Total revenues decreased 83% from $3,101 in 2002 to $530 in 2003 and decreased 82% from $17,357 in 2001 to $3,101 in 2002. During 2002, the Company executed software contracts with two major companies that totaled more than $1,200 in license revenues as well as significant integration services revenues. During 2003, no such contracts were executed. The decline in revenues may also be affected by the Company's financial condition as well as the overall economy as certain prospective customers have deferred purchasing activity. The significant decrease in revenues from 2001 to 2002 is primarily the result of the sale of substantially all of the Messaging and Application Engineering segment products (approximately $17,200 of total revenues) at the start of the fourth quarter of 2001. Gross profit margin (loss) was (925)%, (173)%, and (36)% for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Desktop Integration segment had a gross margin (loss) of (1,053)% for the year ended December 31, 2003 and a gross margin (loss) of (204)% for the year ended December 31, 2002. Cicero is still a relatively new product and the software amortization expense was being recognized over a three-year period. In July 2002, the Company reassessed the life of the Cicero technology in light of the extension of the license and exclusivity provisions in perpetuity. As a result, the Company changed the estimated useful life to be 5 years, which resulted in a reduction in 2002 amortization expense by $2,407. At each balance sheet date, the Company reassesses the recoverability of the Cicero technology in accordance with FASB 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed". This assessment was completed due to the Company's continued operating losses and the limited software revenue generated by the Cicero technology over the past twelve to eighteen months. Currently, the Company is in negotiations with numerous customers to purchase licenses, which would have a significant impact on the cash flows from the Cicero technology and the Company. Since the negotiations have been in process for several months and expected completion of the transactions has been delayed, the Company has reduced its cash flow projections. Historical cash flows generated by the Cicero technology do not support the long-lived asset and accordingly the Company has impaired the excess of the unamortized book value of the technology in excess of the expected net realizable value as of September 30, 2003 and at December 31, 2003. These charges, in the amount of $745 and $248 respectively, have been recorded as cost of software revenue. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2003 was insignificant. No future revenues are anticipated in that segment as all the products have been either sold or discontinued. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Messaging and Application Engineering segment had a gross margin (loss) of (105%). SOFTWARE PRODUCTS. Software product revenue decreased approximately 93% in 2003 from those results achieved in 2002 and decreased 10% in 2002 as compared to 2001. Software revenues in 2003 and 2002 are from the new Cicero product as the Company changed its strategic focus to the Desktop Integration segment. In 2001, software revenues primarily resulted from the Messaging and Application Engineering products, which were sold in the beginning of the fourth quarter of that year. 36 The gross margin on software products was (3,971)%, (396)% and (793)% for the 2003, 2002 and 2001 years ended, respectively. Cost of software is composed primarily of amortization of software product technology, amortization of capitalized software costs for internally developed software, impairment of software product technology, and royalties to third parties, and to a lesser extent, production and distribution costs. The decrease in cost of software for 2003 as compared with 2002 is due to the change in the amortization period from three years to five years, offset by impairment charges totaling $993. The decrease in cost of software from 2001 to 2002 reflects the impact of the sale of the AppBuilder product in the fourth quarter of 2001 of approximately $1,760, an impairment of $3,070 in the net realizable value of the CTRC technology in third quarter of 2001 and the impact of the change in the amortization period for the Cicero technology in July 2002 of $2,407. The software product gross margin (loss) for the Desktop Integration segment was (3,971)% in 2003 and (309)% in 2002. The software product gross margin (loss) on the Messaging and Application Engineering segment was zero for 2003 and (1,162)% in 2002. The Company expects to see significant increases in software sales related to the Desktop Integration segment coupled with improving margins on software products as Cicero gains acceptance in the marketplace. The Company's expectations are based on its review of the sales cycle that has developed around the Cicero product since being released by the Company, its review of the pipeline of prospective customers and their anticipated capital expenditure commitments and budgeting cycles, as well as the establishment of viable reference points in terms of an installed customer base with Fortune 500 Companies. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment revenue is expected to be deminimus as the majority of the products comprising this segment have been sold. MAINTENANCE. Maintenance revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased by approximately 45% or $255 from 2002. The decline in maintenance revenues in 2003 as compared to 2002 is the result of the sale of the CTRC and Star SQL products in June 2002. Maintenance revenues declined by approximately $8,691 or 94% in 2002 as compared to 2001. The decline in maintenance revenue is directly related to the sale of the Messaging and Application Engineering segment products in the fourth quarter of 2001. The Desktop Integration segment accounted for approximately 80% of total maintenance revenue and the Messaging and Application Engineering segment accounted for approximately 20% of total maintenance revenues in 2003. Cost of maintenance is comprised of personnel costs and related overhead and the cost of third-party contracts for the maintenance and support of the Company's software products. The Company experienced a gross margin (loss) on maintenance products of (18)% for 2003. Gross margins on maintenance products for 2002 and 2001 were 68% and 65% respectively. Maintenance revenues are expected to increase, primarily in the Desktop Integration segment. The majority of the products comprising the Messaging and Application Engineering segment have been sold and thus future revenues will be significantly lower as will the cost of maintenance associated with this segment. The cost of maintenance should increase slightly for the Desktop Integration segment. SERVICES. Services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased by approximately 89% or $927 from 2002. The decline in service revenues is directly attributed to the lack of software license revenues in 2003. Service revenues for 2002 as compared to 2001 declined by 84% or $5,398. This decline is attributed to the sale of the Messaging and Application Engineering segment products in 2001. The principal product within the Messaging and Application Engineering segment products was AppBuilder. This product enabled companies to build new applications and typically, those customers utilized the Company's consultants to assist in the application development. Cost of services primarily includes personnel and travel costs related to the delivery of services. Services gross margin (loss) was (711)%, 13% and 15% for the years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively. Services revenues are expected to increase for the Desktop Integration segment as the Cicero product gains acceptance. The Messaging and Application Engineering segment service revenues will continue to be deminimus as the majority of the relevant products have been sold. SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses primarily include personnel costs for salespeople, marketing personnel, travel and related overhead, as well as trade show participation and promotional expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 40% or approximately $1,128 in 2003 due to a reduction in the Company's sales and marketing workforce, decreased promotional activities and a reduction in the sales compensation structure. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 75% or approximately $8,234 in 2002 as a result of the Company's restructuring activities and the sale of most of the Messaging and Application Engineering segment products in the fourth quarter of 2001. 37 Sales and marketing expenses are expected to increase slightly as the Company adds additional direct sales personnel and supports the sales function with collateral marketing materials. The Company's emphasis for the sales and marketing groups will be the Desktop Integration segment. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expenses primarily include personnel costs for product authors, product developers and product documentation and related overhead. Research and development expense decreased by 47% or $885 in 2003 over the same period in 2002 and decreased by 65% or $3,463 in 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001. The decline in both periods is attributed to operational restructurings and reduction in workforce. The Company intends to continue to make a significant investment in research and development on its Cicero product while enhancing efficiencies in this area. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses consist of personnel costs for the executive, legal, financial, human resources, IT and administrative staff, related overhead, and all non-allocable corporate costs of operating the Company. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased by 35% or $1,377 over the prior year. In fiscal 2002, general and administrative expenses decreased by 59% or $5,695. The sharp decline in general and administrative costs in 2003 and 2002 reflect the restructuring program conducted by the Company during 2001 and 2002. In addition, during 2001, the Company recognized a charge of approximately $3,800 from a significant customer who filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. General and administrative expenses are expected to decrease going forward as the Company experiences the synergies of its smaller size and the cost reductions associated with previous office closings. AMORTIZATION OF GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS. Amortization of goodwill was $0 for 2003 and 2002. Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets during 2001 amounted to $6,259. The reduction in amortization expense in 2002 is primarily attributable to the sale of Geneva AppBuilder products in October 2001 as well as the effect of impairment on the intangible assets acquired from StarQuest. At December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, there was no remaining goodwill on the Company's balance sheet. RESTRUCTURING. As part of the Company's plan to focus on the emerging desktop integration marketplace with its new Cicero product, the Company has completed substantial restructurings in 2002 and 2001. As of December 31, 2002, the Company's accrual for restructuring was $772, which was primarily comprised of excess facility costs. As more fully discussed in Note 20 Contingencies, in 2003 the Company settled litigation relating to these excess facilities. Accordingly, the Company has reversed the restructuring balance. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign the note receivable from the sale of Geneva to EM Software Solutions, Inc., (see Note 2 Dispositions), with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the note receivable should the note obligor, EM Software Solutions, Inc., default on future payments. The current unpaid principal portion of the note receivable assigned is approximately $545 and matures December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a probability weighted cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company announced an additional round of restructurings to further reduce its operating costs and streamline its operations. The Company recorded a restructuring charge in the amount of $1,300, which encompassed the cost associated with the closure of the Company's Berkeley, California facility as well as a significant reduction in the Company's European personnel. During the first quarter of 2001, the Company announced and began implementation of an initial operational restructuring. The Company recorded restructuring charges of $6,650 during the quarter ended March 31, 2001 and an additional charge of $2,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. Restructuring charges have been classified in "Restructuring" on the consolidated statements of operations. These operational restructurings involved the reduction of employee staff throughout the Company in all geographical regions in sales, marketing, services, development and all administrative functions. 38 The overall restructuring plan included the termination of 236 employees. The plan included a reduction of 107 personnel in the European operations and 129 personnel in the US operations. Employee termination costs comprised severance-related payments for all employees terminated in connection with the operational restructuring. Termination benefits did not include any amounts for employment-related services prior to termination. IMPAIRMENT OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS. In May 2001, management reevaluated and modified its approach to managing the business and opted to conduct business and assess the efficiency of operations under a line-of-business approach. As such, the Company performed an assessment of the recoverability of its long-lived assets under a line-of-business approach, representing a change in accounting principle inseparate from the effect of the change in accounting estimates. This represents an accounting change from the Company's previous policy of assessing impairment of intangible assets at the enterprise level, which is accounted for as a change in estimate. The change reflects management's changed approach to managing the business. During the third quarter of 2001, the Company was notified by one of its resellers that they would no longer engage in re-sales of the Company's CTRC product, a component of the Messaging and Application Engineering segment. This reseller accounted for substantially all of the CTRC product sales. As a result, the Company performed an assessment of the recoverability of the Messaging and Application Engineering segment. The results of the Company's analysis of undiscounted cash flows indicated that an impairment charge would be appropriate. The Company estimated the fair market value of the related assets through a discounted future cash flow valuation technique. The results of this analysis indicated the carrying value of these intangible assets exceeded their fair market values. The Company reduced the carrying value of the intangible assets and software product technology by approximately $7,929 and $3,070, respectively, as of September 30, 2001. CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF WARRANT LIABILITY. The Company has issued warrants to Series A3 and Series B3 preferred stockholders which contain provisions that allow the warrant holders to force a cash redemption for events outside the control of the Company. The fair value of the warrants is accounted for as a liability and is re-measured at each balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2003, the warrant liability had a fair value of $198 and the Company had recorded the change in the fair value of the warrant liability of $133 for the year ended December 31, 2003 in the consolidated statements of operations. PROVISION FOR TAXES. The Company's effective income tax rate for continuing operations differs from the statutory rate primarily because an income tax benefit was not recorded for the net loss incurred in 2003, 2002 or 2001. Because of the Company'sCompany’s inconsistent earnings history, the deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. The income tax provision (credit) for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 is primarily related to income taxes associated with foreign operations and foreign withholding taxes. IMPACT OF INFLATION.

48


Impact of Inflation. Inflation has not had a significant effect on the Company'sour operating results during the periods presented. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES OPERATING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES For


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating and Investing Activities

We generated $281,000 of cash for the three monthsyear ended MarchDecember 31, 2004, the Company generated approximately $100 of cash. 2006.

Operating activities utilized approximately $1,000 of cash, which is primarily comprised of the loss from operations of approximately $2,600, offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of approximately $700, and an impairment of goodwill from the acquisition of the Ensuredmail technology in the amount of approximately $600. In addition, the Company's cash increased by approximately $200 from the reduction in prepaid expenses and other assets, approximately $100 for an increase in deferred revenues from maintenance contracts and $50 for the increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses to vendors for services rendered. The Company generated approximately $1,100 in cash during the quarter from financing activities from the proceeds of an additional round of investment from several new investors totaling $1,200, net short term borrowings of $100, offset by a net reduction in the Company's short-term debt in the amount of $200. By comparison, in 2003, the Company generated approximately $500 in cash during the quarter. 39 Operating activities in the first quarter of 2003 utilized approximately $1,500 of cash, which is primarily comprised of the loss from operations of $3,000, offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of approximately $800. In addition, the Company had a reduction in accounts receivable of approximately $1,200 and used approximately $1,000 in fulfillment of its obligations to its creditors through its accounts payable and other accrued liabilities. The significant reduction in accounts receivable is the result of the reduction in overall revenues resulting from the sale of substantially all of the Messaging and Application Engineering products. In the first quarter of 2003, the Company utilized approximately $1,000 in cash from investing activities, which is comprised of approximately $1,800 of cash placed in escrow from the proceeds of the sale of Senior Convertible Redeemable Preferred Shares offset by the collection of approximately $800 in Notes Receivable. In the first quarter of 2003, the Company generated approximately $3,100 in cash during the quarter from financing activities from the proceeds of the sale of senior convertible redeemable shares of approximately $3,500, offset by a reduction in the Company's short-term debt in the amount of approximately $400. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, the Company utilized $180 of cash. Operating activities utilized approximately $4,800$2,224,000 in cash, which was primarily comprised of the loss from operations of $10,000,$2,997,000, offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of approximately $3,100, an impairment$12,000, and stock compensation expense of software technology of $1,000$615,000 and a non-cash decrease in the fair valueprovision for doubtful accounts of its warrant liability of $100.$50,000. In addition, the Companywe had a reductionan increase in accounts receivable of $1,400, a reduction in assets and liabilities of discontinued operations of $100 and$202,000, offset by a reduction of prepaid expenses and other assets of $400. The Company$31,000. We generated approximately $800$311,000 in cash from investing activities, which was primarilythrough an increase in the resultamount owing its creditors.

We utilized approximately $17,000 in cash in the purchase of the collection of various notes receivable. The Companyupdating our network equipment.

We generated approximately $3,800$2,528,000 of cash during the year from financing activities as a resultfrom increases in Convertible Bridge notes of proceeds$2,148,000 and from a private placement of common stock and warrants in the amount of $800, cash proceeds from warrant exercises of $400 and cash proceedsapproximately $380,000 resulting from the saleconversion of Series D Preferred Stock of approximately $3,500 offset by cash held in escrow of $776. In addition, the Company incurred gross borrowings of $1,000 and repaid $1,200 against those borrowings. By comparison, the Companyother debt to equity.


We utilized approximately $311$78,000 in cash duringfor the year ended December 31, 2002. 2005.

Operating activities utilized approximately $7,200 of$2,564,000 in cash, which was primarily comprised of the loss from operations of $18,200,$3,681,000, offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of approximately $8,000$11,000, and a non-cash decrease in the fair valuestock compensation expense of its warrant liability of $2,900.$149,000. In addition, the Companywe had a reduction in accounts receivable of $146,000, as well as a reduction of prepaid expenses and other assets held for sale of approximately $6,400 and used approximately $2,100 in fulfillment of its obligations to its creditors through its accounts payable. The Company$55,000. We generated approximately $3,900$804,000 in cash through an increase in the amount owing its creditors. We had a decrease of $29,000 in assets and liabilities of discontinued operations, a decrease in $12,000 for its provision for uncollectible accounts, and a decrease of $7,000 in deferred revenue.

We utilized approximately $6,000 in cash from investing activities, which was primarily comprisedin the purchase of approximately $2,500 in proceeds from the collection of various notes receivable and approximately $1,000 in proceeds from the sale of a line of business. The Companyupdating our network equipment.

We generated approximately $3,200$2,487,000 of cash during the year from financing activities as a result of proceedsthe extension to its Note and Warrant offering of $944,000 and $1,615,000 of financing from a private placementour Convertible bridge notes offset by repayments of common stock and warrantsour short-term debt in the amount of $2,000 and cash proceeds of a Preferred Stock offering in the amount of $1,400. FINANCING ACTIVITIES The Company$55,000.

Financing Activities

We funded itsour cash needs during the quarteryear ended MarchDecember 31, 20042006 with cash on hand from December 31, 2003, with cash2005, as well as through the use of proceeds from operations and with the cash realized fromborrowings under convertible debt agreements.

We have a private placement of its common stock and with the cash received from short-term convertible note obligations. In March 2004, the Company converted a promissory note into a convertible loan agreement with Mark and Carolyn Landis, who are related by marriage to Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan is convertible into 446,429 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 446,429 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.28. The warrants expire in three years. The Company also entered into convertible loan agreements with two other individual investors, each in the face amount of $50,000. Under the terms of the agreement, each loan is convertible into 135,135 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 135,135 shares of common stock at $0.37 per share. The warrants expire in three years. 40 The Company has a $1,971$1,971,000 term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1%1.5% (approximately 2.2% at March6.37% as of December 31, 2004)2006), interest on which is payable quarterly. There are no financial covenants. On November 15, 2003, the Company reached an agreement with Bank Hapoalim, the holder ofcovenants and the term loan is guaranteed by Liraz Systems, Ltd., our former principal shareholder. In September 2004, the Company and Liraz Systems Ltd. ("Liraz"), the guarantor ofagreed to extend its guaranty on the term loan with Bank Hapoalim, and to extend the maturity date on the loan to November 3, 2005. Under the terms of the agreement with Liraz, we agreed to issue 39,420 shares of our common stock. In November 2005, the Company and Liraz Systems Ltd. agreed to extend its guaranty on the term loan untilwith Bank Hapoalim, and to extend the maturity date on the loan to November 14, 2004. In consideration for15, 2006. Under the extensionterms of the guaranty, the Company issued 150,000agreement with Liraz, we agreed to issue 24,000 shares of our common stock toand granted a designated subsidiary of Liraz at the time of the extension and subsequently issued an additional 150,000 shares to Liraz on March 31, 2004. The Company funded its cash needs during the year ended December 31, 2003 with cash on hand from December 31, 2002, through the use of proceeds from a private placement of common stock and warrants, a private placement of preferred stock and warrants, and with cash from operations. On March 19, 2003, the Company completed a $3,500 private placement of Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series D Preferred Stock"), convertible at a conversion ratio of $0.32 per share of common stock into an aggregate of 11,031,250 shares of common stock. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrantswarrant to purchase an aggregateadditional 36,000 shares of 4,158,780 shares ofour common stock at an exercise price of $0.07$0.2 per share ("Series D-1 Warrants"). On October 10, 2003, the Company, consistent with its obligations, also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,665,720 shares of common stock at an exercise price the lesser of $0.20 per share orshare. Based upon fair market pricevalue at the time of exercise ("Series D-2 Warrants"). The Series D-2 Warrants became exercisable on November 1, 2003, becauseissuance, we recognized $48,000 as loan amortization costs in the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. Because the warrants are contingently issuable upon an event outside the control of the Company failed(the proposed Plan of Recapitalization), we did not recognize any value to report $6,000 in gross revenues forthese warrants until the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003. Both existing and new investors participated in the financing.contingency was removed. In November 2006, The Company alsoand Liraz Systems Ltd. agreed to registerextend its guaranty on the common stock issuable upon conversion ofterm loan with Bank Hapoalim, and to extend the Series D Preferred Stock and exercise ofmaturity date on the warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.loan to October 31, 2007. Under the terms of the financing agreement a redemption event may occur if any one person, entity or group shall control more than 35%with Liraz, we agreed to issue 60,000 shares of our common stock.

49


Based upon fair market value at the voting powertime of the Company's capital stock. The Company allocated the proceeds received from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock and warrants to the preferred stock and detachable warrants on a relative fair value basis, resultingissuance, we recognized $240,000 as loan amortization costs in the allocationStatement of $2,890 toOperations for the Series D Preferred Stockyear ended December 31, 2006. In addition, since the contingency surrounding the warrants granted in the prior years’ debt extension was removed, we also recognized $72,000 as the value of these warrants and $640 toas loan amortization costs in the detachable warrants. Based uponStatement of Operations for the allocationyear ended December 31, 2006.

In 2004, we announced a Note and Warrant Offering in which warrant holders of the proceeds, the Company determined that the effectiveour common stock were offered a one-time conversion of their existing warrants at a conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock was less than the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. The beneficial conversion feature was recorded$0.10 per share as a discount on the value of the Series D Preferred Stock and an increase in additional paid-in capital. Because the Series D Preferred Stock was convertible immediately upon issuance, the Company fully amortized such beneficial conversion feature on the date of issuance. As part of the financing, the Company and the lead investors have agreed to form a joint venture to exploit the Cicero technology in the Asian market. The terms of the agreement required that the Company deposit $1,000 of the gross proceeds from the financing into escrow to fund the joint venture. The escrow agreement allows for the immediate release of funds to cover organizational costs of the joint venture. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, $225 of escrowed funds were released. Since the joint venture was not formed and operational on or by July 17, 2003, the lead investors have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium, less their pro-rata share of expenses. The Company and the lead investor have mutually agreed to extend the escrow release provisions until May 31, 2004. Another condition of the financing required the Company to place an additional $1,000 of the gross proceeds into escrow, pending the execution of a definitive agreement with Merrill Lynch providing for the sale of all right, title and interest to the Cicero technology. Since a transaction with Merrill Lynch for the sale of Cicero was not consummated by May 18, 2003, the lead investors have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium. During the second quarter, $390 of escrowed funds was released. In addition, the Company and the lead investor agreed to extend the escrow release provisions until the end of July 2003 when all remaining escrow monies were released to the Company. 41 In connection with the sale of Series D Preferred Stock, the holders of the Company's Series A3 Preferred Stock and Series B3 Preferred Stock (collectively, the "Existing Preferred Stockholders"), entered into an agreement whereby the Existing Preferred Stockholders have agreed to waive certain applicable price protection anti-dilution provisions.recapitalization plan. Under the terms of the waiver agreement, the Company is also permittedoffer, which expired on December 31, 2004, warrant holders who elected to issue equity securities representing aggregate proceedsconvert, would tender their conversion price in cash and receive a Note Payable in exchange. As of up to an additional $4,900 following the saleDecember 31, 2004 we had raised $1,615,000. Upon approval of the Series D Preferred Stock. Additionally, the Existing PreferredPlan of Recapitalization at a Stockholders have also agreed to a limited lock-up restricting their ability to sell common stock issuable upon conversion of their preferred stock and warrants and to waive the accrual of any dividends that may otherwise be payable as a result of the Company's delisting from Nasdaq. As consideration for the waiver agreement, the Company has agreed to issue on a pro rata basis up to 1,000,000 warrants to all the Existing Preferred Stockholders on a pro rata basis at such time and from time to time as the Company closes financing transactions that represent proceeds in excess of $2,900, excluding the proceeds from the Series D Preferred Stock transaction and any investments made by a strategic investor in the software business. Such warrants will have an exercise price that is the greater of $0.40 or the same exercise price as the exercise price of the warrant, or equity security, that the Company issues in connection with the Company's financing or loan transaction that exceeds the $2,900 threshold. In October 2003, the Company completed a common stock financing round wherein it raised $853 of capital. The offering closed on October 15, 2003. The Company sold 1,894,444meeting, these Notes converted into shares of common stockstock. In addition, those warrant holders who elected to convert the first $1 million of warrants would receive additional replacement warrants at a ratio of 2:1 for each warrant converted, with a strike price of $0.45$10.00 per shareshare. In addition, upon approval of the Plan of Recapitalization, each warrant holder received additional warrants to purchase our common stock. In early 2005, we announced an extension to the Note and Warrant offering and as of December 31, 2005, we had raised an additional $944,000 for a total of $853 in proceedsapproximately $2,559,000. Upon effectiveness of the Plan of Recapitalization, $2,309,000 of the Note and issued warrants to purchase 473,611Warrant holders converted into 3,438,473 shares of the Company'sour common stock at an exercise pricestock.

From July through December 2006, we entered into several Convertible Bridge Notes with a consortium of $0.45. The warrants expire three yearsinvestors. We had raised a total of $3,915,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes of which $746,000 was from the datevarious members of grant. As partour Board of an agreement with Liraz Systems Ltd, the guarantor of the Company's term loan, the Company used $200 of the proceeds to reduce the principal outstanding on the term loan to $1,971. In January 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail, a federally certified encryption software company.Directors. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, Level 8 issued 2,027,027these Notes, holders converted their Notes into 30,508,448 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.37. The total purchase priceupon effectiveness of the assets acquired plus the assumptionPlan of certain liabilities being acquired was $750 and has been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. The Company agreed to register the common stock for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Also in January 2004, and simultaneously with the asset purchase of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., the Company completed a common stock financing round wherein it raised $1,247 of capital from several new investors as well as certain investors of Critical Mass Mail, Inc. The Company sold 3,369,192 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase 3,369,192 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.37. The warrants expire three years from the date of grant. The Company also agreed to register the common stock and the warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company has incurred losses of approximately $10,000 and $18,000 in the past two years and has experienced negative cash flows from operations for each of the past three years. For the quarter ended March 31, 2004 the Company incurred an additional loss of approximately $2,600 and has a working capital deficiency of approximately $6,700. The Company's future revenues are entirely dependent on acceptance of a newly developed and marketed product, Cicero, which has limited success in commercial markets to date. Accordingly, there is substantial doubtRecapitalization.

We believe that the Company canPlan of Recapitalization has and will continue asto have a going concern. In orderpositive impact on our future operations and our ability to address these issues andraise additional capital that we will need to obtain adequate financing for the Company's operations for the next twelve months, the Company is actively promoting and expanding its product line and continues to negotiate with significant customers that have begun or finalized the "proof of concept" stage with the Cicero technology. The Company is experiencing difficulty increasing sales revenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about the financial viability of the Company. The Company is attempting to solve the former problem by improving the market's knowledge and understanding of Cicero through increased marketing and leveraging its limited number of reference accounts. Additionally, the Company is seeking additional equity capital or other strategic transactions in the near term to provide additional liquidity. The Company closed a strategic acquisition of an encryption technology asset in January 2004 and a private placement of its common stock wherein it has raised approximately $1,247. The Company expects that increased revenues will reduce its operating losses in future periods, however,continue operations. However, there can be no assurance that managementwe will be successful in executing as anticipated or in a timely enough manner. If these strategies are unsuccessful, the Companywe may have to pursue other means of financing that may not be on terms favorable to the Company or its stockholders. If the Company iswe are unable to increase cash flow or obtain financing, itwe may not be able to generate enough capital to fund operations for the next twelve months. We do not believe that we currently have sufficient cash on hand to finance operations for the next twelve months. At our current rates of expense and assuming revenues for the next twelve months at the annualized rate of revenue for the year ended 2006, we will be able to fund planned operations with existing capital resources for a minimum of four months and with sufficient resources we expect to experience negative cash flow of approximately $2.0 million during the next twelve months to maintain planned operations. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements presented herein do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should Level 8we be unable to continue as a going concern. 42 CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

In April 2005, we borrowed $30,000 from a member of our Board of Directors pursuant to a convertible loan agreement. Under the term of this agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 428,571 shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.07 per share which was the fair market value of our stock at the time of the loan ( pre reverse stock split ratio). As part of the Plan of Recapitalization, this debt along with all other convertible promissory notes totaling $992,000 was converted into 1,591 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock.

In January 2004, we completed a common stock financing round wherein we raised $1,247,000 of capital from several new investors as well as certain investors of Critical Mass Mail, Inc. We sold 3,369,192 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. As part of the financing, we also issued warrants to purchase 3,369,192 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.37. The warrants have expired. The shares issued and the conversion price reflect fair market value of our common stock on the date of the transaction and are prior to effecting the reverse stock split.

We incurred a loss from continuing operations of approximately $2,997,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 in addition to losses from continuing operations of approximately $13,412,000 for the previous two fiscal years. We have experienced negative cash flows from operations for the past three years. At December 31, 2006, we had a working capital deficiency of approximately $7,894,000. Our future revenues are entirely dependent on acceptance of Cicero®, which has had limited success in commercial markets to date. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt that the Company can continue as a going concern and the independent auditor’s report accompanying our financial statements raises doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern. In order to address these issues and to obtain adequate financing

50


for our operations for the next twelve months, we are actively promoting and expanding our product line and continue to negotiate with significant customers that have expressed interest in the Cicero® technology. We are experiencing difficulty increasing sales revenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about the financial viability of the Company. Cicero® software is a new “category defining” product in that most Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) projects are performed at the server level and Cicero’s integration occurs at the desktop level without the need to open and modify the underlying code for those applications being integrated. Many companies are not aware of this new technology or tend to look toward more traditional and accepted approaches. We are attempting to solve the former problem by improving the market’s knowledge and understanding of Cicero® software through increased marketing and leveraging our limited number of reference accounts, while enhancing our list of resellers and systems integrators to assist in the sales and marketing process. Additionally, we must seek additional equity capital or other strategic transactions in the near term to provide additional liquidity.

Contractual Obligations

Future minimum payments for all contractual obligations for years subsequent to December 31, 20032006 are as follows:
2004 2005 2006 2007 TOTAL ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ follows (in thousands):

  
2007
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
Total
 
Short and long-term debt, including interest payments $3,212 $31 $-- $-- $3,243 
Service purchase commitments  275  --  --  --  275 
Operating leases  65  6  --  --  71 
Capital leases  2  1  --  --  3 
Total $3,554 $38 $-- $-- $3,592 

Short and long-term debt, including interest payments includes an outstanding indebtedness of approximately $1,971,000 term loan with Bank Hapoalim guaranteed by Liraz Systems Ltd., and long-term debt, including interest $2,625 $ -- $ -- $ 131 $2,756 payments Service purchase commitments 400 -- -- -- 400 Operating leases 214 221 84 -- 519 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Total $3,239 $ 221 $ 84 $ 131 $3,675 ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
The Company is also obligated to file a Form S-1 registration statement for sales of Level 8 Systems securities. The Company anticipates the cost of such filing to approximate $52. At March 31, 2004, the Company had $2,692 of Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding. Under the terms of the agreement, a redemption event may occur if any one person, entity or group shall control more than 35% of the voting power of the Company's capital stock. $250,000 short-term note with SDS Merchant Fund.

Under the employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Pizi effective January 1, 2004,2006, the Company is towill pay Mr. Pizi an annual base salary of $200,$150,000 and a performance bonusbonuses in cash of up to $400$350,000 per annum based upon certain revenue goals and operating metrics, as determined by the Compensation Committee of theour Board of Directors, of the Company, in its discretion. Upon termination of Mr. Pizi's employment by the Company without cause, the Company haswe agreed to pay Mr. Pizi (a) a lump sum payment of one year of Mr. Pizi's then current base salary and all deferred but unpaid salaries and bonuses within thirty (30) days of termination, and (b) twoall then outstanding but unvested stock options shall vest one hundred thousand (200,000) shares of the Company's common stock. percent (100%).

Under the employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Broderick effective January 1, 2004,2006, the Company payswill pay Mr. Broderick aan annual base salary of $200,$150,000 and a performance bonusbonuses in cash of cash up to $100$350,000 per annum based upon certain revenue goals and operating metrics, as determined by the Compensation Committee of theour Board of Directors, of the Company, in its discretion. Upon termination of Mr. Broderick's employment by the Company without cause, the Company haswe agreed to payprovide Mr. Broderick with a lump sum payment equal to six monthsof one year of Mr. Broderick'sBroderick’s then current base salary and payment of all deferred salaries and bonuses within thirty (30) days of termination. OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS The Company doesIn addition, all then outstanding but unvested stock options shall vest one hundred percent (100%).

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements. We have no subsidiaries or other unconsolidated limited purpose entities, and we have not guaranteed or otherwise supported the obligations of any other entity.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The policies discussed below are considered by us to be critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they require us to apply the mostour judgment and make estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs. With respect to the policies discussed below, we note that because of the uncertainties inherent in forecasting, the estimates frequently require adjustment.

51


Our financial statements and related disclosures, which are prepared to conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and accounts receivable and expenses during the period reported. We are also required to disclose amounts of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Our actual results in future periods could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements in the period they are determined to be necessary.

We consider the most significant accounting policies and estimates in our financial statements to be those surrounding: (1) revenue recognition; (2) allowance for doubtful trade accounts receivable; (3) valuation of notes receivable; (4) capitalization and valuation of software product technology; (5) valuation of deferred tax assets; and (6) restructuring reserves. These accounting policies, the basis for any estimates and potential impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements, should any of the estimates change, are further described as follows: 43 REVENUE RECOGNITION.

Revenue Recognition.Our revenues are derived principally from three sources: (i) license fees for the use of our software products; (ii) fees for consulting services and training; and (iii) fees for maintenance and technical support. We generally recognize revenue from software license fees when a license agreement has been signed by both parties, the fee is fixed or determinable, collection of the fee is probable, delivery of our products has occurred and no other significant obligations remain. For multiple-element arrangements, we apply the "residual method"“residual method”. According to the residual method, revenue allocated to the undelivered elements is allocated based on vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE"(“VSOE”) of fair value of those elements. VSOE is determined by reference to the price the customer would be required to pay when the element is sold separately. Revenue applicable to the delivered elements is deemed equal to the remainder of the contract price. The revenue recognition rules pertaining to software arrangements are complicated and certain assumptions are made in determining whether the fee is fixed and determinable and whether collectability is probable. For instance, in our license arrangements with resellers, estimates are made regarding the reseller'sreseller’s ability and intent to pay the license fee. Our estimates may prove incorrect if, for instance, subsequent sales by the reseller do not materialize. Should our actual experience with respect to collections differ from our initial assessment, there could be adjustments to future results.

Revenues from services include fees for consulting services and training. Revenues from services are recognized on either a time and materials or percentage of completion basis as the services are performed and amounts due from customers are deemed collectible and non-refundable. Revenues from fixed price service agreements are recognized on a percentage of completion basis in direct proportion to the services provided. To the extent the actual time to complete such services varies from the estimates made at any reporting date, our revenue and the related gross margins may be impacted in the following period. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.

Allowance for Doubtful Trade Accounts Receivable. In addition to assessing the probability of collection in conjunction with revenue arrangements, we continually assess the collectability of outstanding invoices. Assumptions are made regarding the customer'scustomer’s ability and intent to pay and are based on historical trends, general economic conditions, and current customer data. Should our actual experience with respect to collections differ from our initial assessment, there could be adjustments to bad debt expense. VALUATION OF NOTES RECEIVABLE. We continually assess the collectability

Capitalization and Valuation of outstanding notes receivable. Assumptions are made regarding the counter party's ability and intent to pay and are based on historical trends and general economic conditions, and current financial data. As of March 31, 2004 the Company had no notes receivable. CAPITALIZATION AND VALUATION OF SOFTWARE PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY.Software Product Technology. Our policy on capitalized software costs determines the timing of our recognition of certain development costs. In addition, this policy determines whether the cost is classified as development expense or cost of software revenue. Management is required to use professional judgment in determining whether development costs meet the criteria for immediate expense or capitalization. Additionally, we review software product technology assets for net realizable value at each balance sheet date. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded a write down of software product technology totaling $993 and as of December 31, 2003 the Company had $4,063 in capitalized software product technology. Should we experience reductions in revenues because our business or market conditions vary from our current expectations, we may not be able to realize the carrying value of these assets and will record a write down at that time. VALUATION OF DEFERRED TAX ASSETS. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a write down of software product technology totaling $3,585,000 and as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company had $0 in capitalized software product technology.

Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets.Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply

52


to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established to the extent that it is more likely than not, that we will be unable to utilize deferred income tax assets in the future. At December 31, 2003,2006, we had a valuation allowance of $80,511$97,265,000 against $80,511$97,265,000 of gross deferred tax assets. We considered all of the available evidence to arrive at our position on the net deferred tax asset; however, should circumstances change and alter our judgment in this regard, it may have an impact on future operating results.

At December 31, 2003,2006, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $186,293,$227,539,000, which may be applied against future taxable income. These carryforwards will expire at various times between 20052006 and 2023.2025. A substantial portion of these carryforwards is restricted to future taxable income of certain of the Company'sour subsidiaries or limited by Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Thus, the utilization of these carryforwards cannot be assured. 44 RESTRUCTURING RESERVES. At December 31, 2002, the Company's restructuring liabilities totaled $772, which represented estimated excess facilities costs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In August 2003, the Company settled litigation relating to these excess facilities. Accordingly, the Company has reversed the restructuring balance. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign the note receivable from the sale of Geneva to EM Software Solutions, Inc., (see Note 2 Dispositions), with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the note receivable should the note obligor, EM Software Solutions, Inc., default on future payments. The current unpaid principal portion of the note receivable at assignment is approximately $545 and matures December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a probability weighted cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS: In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 or FIN 46 "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities", an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements". In October 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 46-6, "Effective Date of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" deferring the effective date for applying the provisions of FIN 46 for public entities' interests in variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 for financial statements of interim or annual periods that end after December 15, 2003. FIN 46 establishes accounting guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities that function to support the activities of the primary beneficiary. In December 2003,July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 46 (revised December 2003), "ConsolidationNo. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - An Interpretation of Variable Interest Entities." This revised interpretation isSFAS No. 109”. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN No. 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN No. 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The provisions of FIN No. 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption of this standard. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit (or other appropriate components of equity) for that fiscal year. The provisions of FIN No. 48 are effective for all entities no later thanfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are evaluating the endimpact of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. The Company has no investment in or contractual relationship or other business relationship with a variable interest entity and thereforeadoption of FIN 48 but does not currently expect the adoption of this interpretationnew standard to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulleting (“SAB”) 108, to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 requires that the Company quantify misstatements based on their impact on each of its financial statements and related disclosures. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. We have adopted SAB 108 effective as of January 31, 2007. The adoption of this bulletin did not have anya material impact on its consolidatedour financial position, or results of operations. However, if the Company enters into any such arrangement with a variable interest entity in the future or an entity with which we have a relationship is reconsidered based on guidance in FIN 46 to be a variable interest entity, the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations, mightor cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be materially impacted. DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Asmeasured at fair value, and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by the Company has soldin the first quarter of 2008. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R).  SFAS 123R addresses the accounting for share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options.  Under the new standard, companies will no longer be able to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting For Stock Issued To Employees”.  Instead, companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the expense in the consolidated statement of income.  SFAS 123R is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and allows, but does not require, companies to restate the full fiscal year of 2005 to reflect the impact of expensing share-based payments under SFAS 123R.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock-based awards under SFAS No. 123R, consistent with that used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. We have elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123R and, accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123R. The modified prospective transition method requires that stock-based compensation expense be recorded for all new and unvested

53


stock options that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered beginning on the first day of the Company’s year ended December 31, 2006. Stock-based compensation expense for awards granted prior to 2006 is based on the grant-date fair-value as determined under the pro forma provisions of SFAS No. 123.

Disclosures about Market Risk

As we have disposed of or closed most of itsour European based businessoperations and has closed several European sales offices, the majority of revenues are generated from US sources. The Company expectsWe expect that trend to continue for the next year. As such, there is minimal foreign currency risk at present. Should the Companywe continue to develop a reseller presence in Europe and Asia, that risk will be increased. 45

54


MANAGEMENT As of May 10, 2004,

The following table sets forth certain information about our directors and executive officers:

NameAgePosition(s)
John Broderick57Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Anthony C. Pizi47Director and Chief Information Officer
Mark Landis65Director
Bruce W. Hasenyager65Director
Jay R. Kingley45Director
Charles B. Porciello71Director
Bruce D. Miller56Director
Bruce A. Percelay51Director
John W. Atherton64Director

Mark Landis

Mr. Mark Landis is the Board of DirectorsSenior Managing Member of the Security Growth Fund, a newly established private equity firm focused on the electronic security industry. Prior to joining the Security Growth Fund and since 2003, Mr. Landis was the Executive in Residence of The Jordan Company, consisteda private equity firm based in New York. Mr. Landis retired from being President of Anthony Pizi, Bruce Hasenyager, Nicholas Hatalski, Kenneth Neilsenthe North American Security Division of Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. in July of 2003, having spent 16 years with the company. Mr. Landis earned his B.A. from Cornell University and Jay Kingley. All Directors were elected at the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and will serve until the election and qualification of their successors or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Mr. Frank Artale resignedhis Juris Doctorate from the Board in January 2004.University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Artale's resignation was notLandis received his CPCU - Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriter from the result of a disagreement with the Company or its management. Set forth below with respect to each director is his name, age, principal occupationAmerican Institute for Property and business experience for the past five years and length of service as a director of the Company. ANTHONYLiability Underwriters.

Anthony C. PIZI Director since August 2000. Age: 44 Pizi

Mr. Pizi has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and as Chief Technology Officer sincefrom December 1, 2000.2000 until March 7, 2005 and from June 1, 2005 until July 22, 2005. Mr. Pizi currently is Chief Information Officer. He has served as Chief Executive Officer sinceand Chief Technology Officer from February 1, 2001.2001 to July 22, 2005. Mr. Pizi has been a director since August 2000. Until December 2000, he was First Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Merrill Lynch'sLynch’s Private Client Technology Architecture and Service Quality Group. Mr. Pizi'sPizi’s 16 years with Merrill Lynch included assignments in Corporate MIS, Investment Banking and Private Client. Mr. Pizi earned his BSB.S. in Engineering from West Virginia University. NICHOLAS HATALSKI, MBA Director since September 2002. Age: 42 Mr. Hatalski has been a director of Level 8 since September 2002. Since January 2004, Mr. Hatalski has served as the Vice President of Business Development and Product Strategy at MedSeek, Inc., a company dedicated to providing web-based solutions to the healthcare sector. Since December 2000, he was the Senior Vice President of the iServices Group of Park City Solutions, Inc. Prior to joining PCS, he was the Practice Manager for Technology Consulting at Siemens Health Services. His tenure at Siemens (and their acquisition Shared Medical Systems) was 1984-2000. BRUCE

Bruce W. HASENYAGER Director since October 2002. Age: 62 Hasenyager

Mr. Hasenyager has been a director of Level 8the Company since October 2002. Since April 2002,November 2004, Mr. Hasenyager has served as Principal of Bergen & Webster Executive Communications. Prior to that, he served as Director of Business and Technology Development at the Hart eCenter at Southern Methodist University. PriorUniversity (SMU) and Chief Operating Officer of the Guildhall at SMU. From April 1996 to that,April 2002, Mr. Hasenyager was a founder and served as Senior Vice President and CTO of Technology and Operations and Chief Technology Officer at MobilStar Network Corporation since April 1996. KENNETH W. NIELSEN Director since October 2002. Age: 44 Mr. Nielsen has been a director of Level 8 since October 2002. Since December 1998, Mr. Nielsen has served as President and CEO of Nielsen Personnel Services, inc., a personal staffing firm.Corporation. Prior to that,April 1996, Mr. Nielsen was District Operations Manager for Outsource International, Inc. JAYHasenyager held executive and senior management positions in information technology at Chemical Bank, Merrill Lynch, Kidder Peabody, and Citibank.

Jay R. KINGLEY Director since November 2002. Age: 42 Kingley

Mr. Kingley has been a director of Level 8the Company since November 2002. Since 2001,Mr. Kingley is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Kingley Institute LLC, a medical wellness company. Prior to that, Mr. Kingley has served as CEO of Warren Partners, LLC, a software development and consultancy company. Mr. Kingley is also currently the CEO of Kingley Institute LLC, a medical wellness company. Prior to that, Mr. Kingley was Managing Director of a business development function of Zurich Financial Services Group from 1999-2001. Prior to joining Zurich Financial Services Group, Mr. Kingley was Vice President of Diamond Technology Partners, Inc., a management-consulting firm. 46 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

55


Charles B. Porciello

Mr. Porciello has been a director since June 6, 2005. Since 2003, Mr. Porciello is the Chief Executive Officer of Pilar Services, Inc. From 2001 until 2003, he served as Chief Operating Officer of Enterprise Integration Corporation, a minority-owned IT services company. Prior to that Mr. Porciello worked for various IT companies, developing and facilitating in their growth. Mr. Porciello retired from the U.S. Air Force in 1982 after serving his country for twenty five years. Mr. Porciello graduated from the U.S. Military Academy with a B.S. in Engineering and received his Masters Degree in Management from the University of Nebraska.

Bruce D. Miller

Mr. Bruce D. Miller is a General Partner of Delphi Partners, Ltd. a privately-owned investment partnership since 1989. He is the treasurer and a director of American Season Corporation. Mr. Miller is a board member of Cape Air/Nantucket Airlines, Inc. Mr. Miller is a trustee of the Egan Maritime Foundation and is involved in other non-profit activities. Mr. Miller received his B.S. in Finance from Lehigh University and subsequently earned an M.B.A. from Lehigh.

Bruce A. Percelay

Mr. Percelay has been a director since January 10, 2006. Mr. Percelay is the Founder and Chairman of the Mount Vernon Company, a real estate investment company specializing in the acquisition and renovation of multi-family and commercial properties in Greater Boston Communities. Since 2000, Mr. Percelay has been President of the Board of Habitat for Humanity in Greater Boston. Mr. Percelay is currently Chairman of the Board of Make-A-Wish Foundation of Greater Boston and Eastern Massachusetts. Since 2002, Mr. Percelay has been a Board Member of the Nantucket Historic Association. Mr. Percelay received his B.S. from Boston University School of Management, and a B.A. in Business and Economics from City of London Polytechnic, Special Studies in Economics.

John P. Broderick
Mr. Broderick is currently the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Broderick has served as the Chief Operating Officer of the Company since June 2002, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since April 2001, and as Corporate Secretary since August 2001. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Broderick was Executive Vice President of Swell Inc., a sports media e-commerce company where he oversaw the development of all commerce operations and served as the organization's interim Chief Financial Officer. Previously, Mr. Broderick served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of North American Operations for Programmer's Paradise, a publicly held (NASDAQ: PROG) international software marketer. Mr. Broderick received his B.S. in accounting from Villanova University.

John W. Atherton

Mr. Atherton has been a director since May 12, 2006. Since 2005, Mr. Atherton is the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CityFed Financial, a publicly held financial holding company, based in Nantucket, Massachusetts. He served as Chairman from 1991 until 2005. Mr. Atherton received his B.A. degree from Wesleyan University (Middletown, Connecticut) and an M.B.A. with Distinction from Babson College (Wellesley, Massachusetts).

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is currentlyfor 2006 was comprised of Messrs. Hatalski, Kingley and Neilsen. Mr. Artale also served on the Committee until his resignation from the Board in January 2004.Porciello. None of the current members of the Compensation Committee has served as an executive officer of the Company, and no executive officer of the Company has served as a member of the Compensation Committee of any other entity of which Messrs. Hatalski, Kingley and NeilsenPorciello have served as executive officers. Mr. Porciello is the Chief Executive Office of Pilar Services Inc., our reseller partner. We have recognized approximately $100,000 in revenues with Pilar Services Inc. during 2006. There were no interlocking relationships between the Companyus and other entities that might affect the determination of the compensation of the directors and executive officers of the Company. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

56


Director Compensation

In May 1999, our stockholders of the Company approved the Outside Director Stock Incentive Plan of the Company.Plan. Under this plan, the outside directors may be granted an option to purchase 12,000 shares of common stock at a price equal to the fair market value of the common stock as of the grant date. In January 2002, the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors approved an amendment to the Outside Director Stock Incentive Plan to provide an increase in the number of options to be granted to outside directors to 24,000. These options vest over a three-year period in equal increments upon the eligible Director'sdirector’s election to the Board, with the initial increment vesting on the date of grant. The Outside Director Stock Incentive Plan also permits eligible directors to receive partial payment of director fees in common sharesstock in lieu of cash, subject to approval by the Boardboard of Directors.directors. In addition, the plan permits the Board of Directors to grant discretionary awards to eligible directors under the plan. None of the Company's Directorsour directors received additional monetary compensation for serving on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of the Company in 2001, other than reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings.

In October 2002, the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors approved an amendment to the stock incentive plan for all non-management directors. Under the amendment, each non-management director will receive 100,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. These shares will vest in three equal increments with the initial increment vesting on the date of grant. The option grant contains an acceleration of vesting provision should the Company incur a change in control. A change in control is defined as a merger or consolidation of the Company with or into another unaffiliated entity, or the merger of an unaffiliated entity into the Company or another subsidiary thereof with the effect that immediately after such transaction the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the transaction hold less than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of all securities generally entitled to vote in the election of directors, managers or trustees of the entity surviving such merger or consolidation. Under the amendment, there will beis no additional compensation awarded for committee participation. The shares allocated to the Board of Directors are beingwere issued out of the Level 8 Systems, Inc.our 1997 Employee Stock Plan. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The Company's current executive officers are listed below, together with their age, position with the Company and business experience for the past five years. ANTHONY C. PIZI Age: 44 Mr. Pizi currently serves as the ChairmanAll of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer of the Company since February options issued are prior to a 100:1 2001. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Pizireverse stock split which was First Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Merrill Lynch's Private Client Technology Architecture and Service Quality Group. Mr. Pizi's 16 years with Merrill Lynch included assignments in Corporate MIS, Investment Banking and Private Client. Mr. Pizi earned his BS in Engineering from West Virginia University. JOHN P. BRODERICK Age: 54 Mr. Broderick has served as the Chief Operating Officer of the Company since June 2002, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since April 2001, and as Corporate Secretary since August 2001. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Broderick was Executive Vice President of Swell Inc., a sports media e-commerce company where he oversaw the development of all commerce operations and served as the organization's interim CFO. Previously, Mr. Broderick served as chief financial officer for Programmer's Paradise, a publicly held (NASDAQ: PROG) international software marketer. Mr. Broderick received his B.S. in accounting from Villanova University. 47 affected at December 31, 2006.
Audit Committee

The Board of Directors has determined that the members of the Audit Committee are independent as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. Until his resignation in January 2004,National Association of Securities Dealers’ listing standards. Mr. Frank ArtaleJohn W. Atherton was designated the "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” as defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K. Following the resignation
Code of Mr. Artale in January 2004, the Company has not appointed a replacement "audit committee financial expert"Ethics and continues to look for a candidate to fill this role on the Board or Directors and the Audit Committee. Conduct
Our Board of Directors has adopted a code of ethics and a code of conduct that applies to all of our directors, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and employees. We will provide copies of our code of conduct and code of ethics without charge upon request. To obtain a copy of the code of ethics or code of conduct, please send your written request to Level 8 Systems,Cicero Inc., Suite 542, 8000 Regency Pkwy, Cary, North Carolina 27511, Attn: Corporate Secretary. The code of ethics is also available on the Company'sour website at www.level8.com. 48 www.ciceroinc.com.
57

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following summary compensation table sets forth the compensation earned by all persons serving as the Company'sCompany’s executive officers during fiscal year 2003, 2006,serving or having served at the end of fiscal 20032005 whose salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 for services rendered to the Company during the fiscal 2003.year 2006. The table reflects compensation earned for each of the last three years or for such shorter period of service as an executive officer as is reflected below. For the principal terms of the options granted during fiscal 2003,2006, see "Option“Option Grants in Fiscal 2003." SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE 2006.”

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position
 
Fiscal Year
 
Salary
 
Bonus
 
Stock Awards
 
Option Awards
 
Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
 
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
 
All Other Compensation
 
Total
 
Anthony C. Pizi 
Chief Information Officer
  
2006
2005
2004
 
$
$
$
150,000
150,000
200,000
(1)
(2)
(3)
$
$
$
--
--
--
  
--
--
--
  
---
--
5,000
  
--
--
--
  
--
--
--
 
$
$
$
--
--
--
 
$
$
$
150,000
150,000
200,000
 
                             
John P. Broderick 
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer,
Corporate Secretary
  
2006
2005
2004
 
$
$
$
150,000
150,000
200,000
(4)
(5)
(6)
$
$
$
--
--
60,000
  
--
--
--
  
--
--
5,000
  
--
--
--
  
--
--
--
 
$
$
$
--
--
--
 
$
$
$
150,000
150,000
200,000
 


NAME AND SECURITIES ALL OTHER PRINCIPAL ISCAL UNDERLYING ANNUAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS OPTIONS COMPENSATION -------- ---- ------ ----- ------- ------------ Anthony C.
(1)Mr. Pizi’s base salary for fiscal 2006 was $150,000. As of December 31, 2006, Mr. Pizi 2003 $ 200,000(2) $ 100,000 500,000 $ --is owed approximately $94,935 of deferred salary and $100,000 of his earned bonus from 2003.

(2)Mr. Pizi’s base salary for fiscal 2005 was $200,000. Mr. Pizi had voluntarily elected to defer $31,250 of salary from 2005. In August 2005 Mr. Pizi voluntarily reduced his annual salary to $150,000 for the year. Mr. Pizi was the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Chief 2002 $ 337,500(3) $ -- 500,000 $ -- Technology Officer and Chairman (1) 2001 $ 527,038 $ -- 500,000 $ -- John P.until July 22, 2005.

(3)Mr. Pizi’s base salary for fiscal 2004 was $200,000. Mr. Pizi had voluntarily elected to defer $50,000 of salary from 2004. In December 2004, Mr. Pizi received approximately $55,000 of deferred salary from 2004 and 2003 and used those proceeds to participate in the Note and Warrant Offering.

(4)Mr. Broderick’s base salary for fiscal 2006 was $150,000. As of December 31, 2006, Mr. Broderick 2003 $ 200,000(4) $ 60,000 500,000 $ --is owed approximately $112,500 of deferred salary and $40,000 of earned bonus from 2003.

(5)Mr. Broderick’s base salary for 2005 was $200,000. Mr. Broderick had voluntarily elected to defer $31,250 of salary from 2005. In August 2005, Mr. Broderick voluntarily reduced his annual salary to $150,000 for the year. Mr. Broderick was appointed the Company’s Chief OperatingExecutive Officer in addition to being the Chief Financial Officer in July 2005. During 2005, Mr. Broderick was paid $13,000 of his accrued bonus from 2003.

(6)Mr. Broderick’s base salary for 2004 was $200,000. Mr. Broderick voluntarily elected to defer $50,000 of salary from 2004 and Financial 2002 $ 200,000 $ 40,000 100,000 $ -- Officer, Corporate Secretary 2001 $ 146,788 $ 40,000 165,900 $ -- all of his earned bonus ($60,000) from 2003.
(1) Mr. Pizi began his service as Chief Executive Officer

58


The Company did not award any grants of stock options to the Named Executives during fiscal 2006. The Company in February 2001. (2) Mr. Pizi's base salary fordid not award any stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) during fiscal 2003 was $200,000. Mr Pizi had voluntarily elected to defer $31,2502006.


The following table sets forth information concerning the options exercised during fiscal 2006 and held at December 31, 2006 by the Named Executives.

Fiscal 2006 Year-End Option Holdings and Values
      
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at December 31, 2006
 
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at
December 31, 2006(1)
 
 Name
 
Shares Acquired on Exercise
 
Value Realized
 
Exercisable
 
Unexercisable
 
Exercisable
 
Unexercisable
 
              
Anthony C. Pizi  --  --  15,000  -0-  -0-  -0- 
                    
John P. Broderick  --  --  12,609  -0-  -0-  -0- 

(1)Based on $2.30 per share, the December 31, 2006, closing price as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board.


Employment Agreements, Termination of salary from 2003. During 2003, a salary deferral of $37,500 from 2002 was repaid to Mr. Pizi. (3) Mr. Pizi's base salary for fiscal 2002 was $300,000. Mr. Pizi had voluntarily elected to defer $75,000 of salary from 2001, which was paid in 2002,Employment and to defer $37,500 of 2002 salary. (4) Mr. Broderick's base salary for 2003 was $200,000. Mr. Broderick voluntarily elected to defer $31,250 of salary from 2003. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS Change-In-Control Arrangements

Under the employment agreement between the Companyus and Mr. Pizi effective January 1, 2004, the Company is2006, we agreed to pay Mr. Pizi an annual base salary of $200,$150,000 and a performance bonusbonuses in cash of up to $400$350,000 per annum based upon certain revenue goals and operating metrics, as determined by the Compensation Committee, of the Board of Directors of the Company, in its discretion. Upon termination of Mr. Pizi'sPizi’s employment by the Company without cause, the Company haswe agreed to pay Mr. Pizi (a) a lump sum payment of one year of Mr. Pizi'sPizi’s then current base salary within thirty (30) days of termination and (b) two hundred thousand (200,000) shares of the Company's common stockany unpaid deferred salaries and immediately vest all unvested stock options held by Mr. Pizi.bonuses. In the event there occurs a substantial change in Mr. Pizi'sPizi’s job duties, there is a decrease in or failure to provide the compensation or vested benefits under the employment agreement or there is a change in control of the Company, we agreed to pay Mr. Pizi one years salary within 30 days of such notice of termination. Mr. Pizi will have thirty (30) days from the date written notice is given about either a change in his duties or the announcement and closing of a transaction resulting in a change in control of the Company has agreed to grant Mr. Pizi five hundred thousand (500,000) shares of the Company's common stock.resign and execute his rights under this agreement. If Mr. Pizi'sPizi’s employment is terminated for any reason, Mr. Pizi has agreed that, for one (1) year after such termination, he will not directly or indirectly solicit or divert business from the Companyus or assist any business in attempting to do so or solicit or hire any person who was anour employee of the Company during the term of his employment agreement or assist any business in attempting to do so.

Under the employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Broderick effective January 1, 2004, the Company pays2006, we agreed to pay Mr. Broderick aan annual base salary of $200,$150,000 and a performance bonusbonuses in cash of cash up to $100$350,000 per annum based upon certain revenue goals and operating metrics, as determined by the Compensation Committee, of the Board of Directors of the Company, in its discretion. Upon termination of Mr. Broderick'sBroderick’s employment by the Company without cause, the Company haswe agreed to providepay Mr. Broderick with salary continuationa lump sum payment of six monthsone year of Mr. Broderick'sBroderick’s then current base salary beginning on the first payday after the datewithin 30 days of termination.termination and any unpaid deferred salaries and bonuses. In the event there occurs a substantial change in Mr. Broderick'sBroderick’s job duties, there is a decrease in or failure to provide the compensation or vested benefits under the employment agreement or there is a change in control of the Company, the Company haswe agreed to pay Mr. Broderick (a) a lump sum payment of one year of Mr. Broderick'sBroderick’s then current base salary within thirty (30) days of termination and (b) two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) shares of the Company's common stock and immediately vest all unvested stock options held by Mr. Broderick.termination. Mr. Broderick will have thirty (30) days from the date written notice is given about either a change in his duties or the announcement and closing of a transaction resulting in a change in control of the Company to resign and execute his rights under this agreement. If Mr. Broderick'sBroderick’s employment is terminated for any reason, Mr. Broderick has agreed that, for one (1) year after such termination, he will not directly or indirectly solicit or divert business from the Companyus or assist any business in attempting to do so or solicit or hire any person who was anour employee of the Company during the term of his employment agreement or assist any business in attempting to do so. 49

59


PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information as of May 10, 2004December 31, 2006 with respect to beneficial ownership of shares by (i) each person known to the Companyus to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock, (ii) each of the Company'sour directors, (iii) theour executive officers of the Company named in the Summary Compensation Table (the "Named Executives"“Named Executives”) and (iv) all of our current directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each person listed is c/o Level 8 Systems,Cicero Inc., 214 Carnegie Center Suite 303, Princeton,1433 State Highway 34, Farmingdale, New Jersey 08540. 07727.

The named person has furnished us stock ownership information to the Company.information. Beneficial ownership as reported in this section was determined in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and includes shares as to which a person possesses sole or shared voting and/or investment power and shares that may be acquired on or before June 20, 2004December 31, 2006 upon the exercise of stock options.options as well as exercise of warrants. The chart is based on 35,571,38335,294,810 common shares outstanding as of May 10, 2004.December 31, 2006. Except as otherwise stated in the footnotes below, the named persons have sole voting and investment power with regard to the shares shown as beneficially owned by such persons.

  
Common Stock
 
Name of Beneficial Owner
 
No. of Shares
 
Percent of Class
 
QueeQueg Partners, L.P. (1)  4,562,465 (2) 12.2%
Queequeg Ltd. (1)  1,504,938 (3) 5%
Mark and Carolyn P. Landis (4)  5,069,153 (5) 13.8%
Anthony C. Pizi  1,416,241 (6) 4.0%
Bruce Miller  1,337,118 (7) 3.8%
Bruce Percelay  1,032,786 (8) 2.9%
John P. Broderick  15,857 (9) * 
John W. Atherton  148,884 (10) * 
Bruce W. Hasenyager  33,652 (11) * 
Charles Porciello  80,286 (12) * 
Jay R. Kingley  1,000 (13) * 
All current directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons)  9,134,977 (14) 24.8%

_____________________
COMMON STOCK ---------------------------------------- NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER NO. OF SHARES PERCENT OF CLASS - ------------------------ ------------- ---------------- Seneca Capital International,
·Represents less than one percent of the outstanding shares.

1.The address of QueeQueg Partners and QueeQueg Ltd.(1)................................ 1,902,771 (2) 5.1% Seneca Capital, is 299 Park Avenue New York, New York 10071.

2.As of December 31, 2006, QueeQueg Partners, L.P.(3).............................................. 1,207,288 (4) 3.3% Anthony C. Pizi...................................................... 1,991,489 (5) 5.3% John owns 4,539,475 shares of common stock, 9.643 shares of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and 13,347 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise prices of the warrants are as follows: 586 at $37.00 per share, 249 at $38.00 per share 3,194 at $40.00 per share, and 9,318 at $10.00 per share. QueeQueg Partners, L.P disclaims beneficial ownership of 4,029 warrant shares because they are anti-dilutive.

3.As of December 31, 2006, QueeQueg, Ltd. owns 1,492,558 shares of common stock, 5.193 shares of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and 7,187 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise prices of the warrants are as follows: 315 at $37.00 per share, 134 at $38.00 per share 1,720 at $40.00 per share, and 5,018 at $10.00 per share. QueeQueg Ltd disclaims beneficial ownership of 2,169 warrant shares because they are anti-dilutive.

4.The address of Mark and Carolyn P. Broderick.................................................... 660,539 (6) 1.8% Nicholas Hatalski.................................................... 66,660 (7) * Kenneth W. Nielsen................................................... 66,660 (7) * Bruce W. Hasenyager.................................................. 66,660 (7) * Jay R. Kingley....................................................... 66,660 (7) * All current directorsLandis is 503 Lake Drive, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.

5.Includes 3,673,695 shares of common stock, 1,326.136 shares of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and executive officers69,322 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise prices of the warrants are as follows: 18,750 at $8.00 per share, 20,000 at $10.00 per share, and 30,572 at $10.00 per share. Disclaims beneficial ownership of 38,750 shares because they are anti-dilutive.

60


6.Includes 1,274,951 shares of common stock, 111.016 shares of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, 15,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty (60) days, and 15,274 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise price of warrants is as follows: 901 shares at $17.00 per share of common stock; 2,706 shares at $20.00 per share of common stock; and 11,667 shares at $10.00 per share of common stock. Disclaims beneficial ownership of 18,607 shares of common stock because they are anti-dilutive.

7.Consists of 758,624 shares of common stock, 49.418 shares of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and 16,295 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants. The exercise prices of the warrants are as follows: 451 at $37.00 per share, 192 at $38.00 per share 2,457 at $40.00 per share, and 13,195 at $10.00 per share. Mr. Miller has sole or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the securities held by Delphi Partners, Ltd., which holds 491,267 shares of common stock, 18.000 shares of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and 3,514 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at $10.00 per share.

8.Consists of 1,032,786 shares of common stock.

9.Includes 3,248 shares of common stock and 12,609 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty (60) days. Disclaims beneficial ownership of 12,609 shares of common stock because they are anti-dilutive.

10.Includes 148,784 shares of common stock, and 100 shares of common stock held in a group (6 persons).. 2,918,668 (8) 7.6% self-directed IRA.
* Represents less than one percent of the outstanding shares. (1) The address of Seneca Capital International, Ltd. is 527 Madison Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10022. (2) Includes 779,826 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series B3 Preferred Stock and 1,122,945 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.40. Mr. Douglas Hirsch exercises sole voting or dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Seneca Capital International, Ltd. (3) The address of Seneca Capital L.P. is 527 Madison Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10022. (4) Includes 417,205 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series B3 Preferred Stock, 188,408 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A3 Preferred Stock and 790,083 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. Mr. Douglas Hirsch exercises sole voting or dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Seneca Capital L.P. (5) Includes 1,187,798 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty (60) days, 394,737 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock, 270,270 shares of common stock exercisable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.37 and 98,684 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.38 per share of common stock subject to adjustment. (6) Consists of 660,539 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty (60) days. (7) Consists of 66,660 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty (60) days. (8) Includes shares issuable upon exercise of options and warrants exercisable within sixty (60) days as described in Notes 5-7. 50

11.Consists of 32,652 shares of common stock and 1,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty (60) days. Disclaims beneficial ownership of 1,000 shares of common stock because they are anti-dilutive.

12.Consists of 80,286 shares of common stock.

13.Consists of 1,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty (60) days. Disclaims beneficial ownership of 1,000 shares of common stock because they are anti-dilutive.

14.Includes shares issuable upon exercise of options and warrants exercisable within sixty (60) days as described in Notes 7-14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

61


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS LOAN FROM RELATED PARTIES In March 2004,

Loan from Related Parties

During 2005, we converted a promissory note into a convertible loan agreement with Mark and Carolyn Landis, who are related by marriage to Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan is convertible into 446,429 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 446,429 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.28. The warrants expire in three years. From time to time during 2003, the Company entered into short term notespayable with Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairmanour former Chief Executive Officer and current Chief ExecutiveInformation Officer, for various working capital needs. The Notes bear interest at 1% per month and are unsecured. At December 31, 2003, the Company was2006, we were indebted to Mr. Pizi in the amount of $85. $9,000.

Convertible Promissory Notes. Directors and executive officers made several loans to us and received convertible promissory notes. As part of the Plan of Recapitalization we adjusted the conversion rates and terms on these notes. These notes were automatically converted into shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Each share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock is convertible into 1,000 shares of our common stock. Because the conversion rates were adjusted, we calculated the amount of the beneficial conversion resulting from the adjusted conversion rate and recorded that amount as a deemed dividend and additional paid in capital. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In JanuaryJune, 2004, the Company repaid Mr. Pizi $75. On April 12, 2004, the Companywe entered into a short termconvertible promissory note payable with Mr. Pizi. The note, in the face amount of $100,000, bearsbore interest at 1% per month and is convertiblewas converted into common stock14 shares of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.37 per share.our Series A-1 Preferred stock. In addition, Mr. Pizi was granted 270,270 warrants to purchase the Company'sour common stock at $0.37 per share. TheseAs part of the Note and warrant Offering, Mr. Pizi elected to convert these warrants by loaning the Company the reduced exercise price

In July 2004, we entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. Pizi. The note, in the face amount of $112,000, bore interest at 1% per month and was converted into 78.4 shares of the Company’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock upon approval of the Plan of Recapitalization. In addition, at the time of the loan, Mr. Pizi was granted warrants to purchase 560,000 shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share. As part of the Note and warrant Offering, Mr. Pizi elected to convert 289,376 of these warrants by loaning the Company the reduced exercise price. Mr. Pizi elected not to exercise 270,624 warrants and after the reverse stock ratio now total 2,706 warrants with an exercise price of $20 per share. Also in July 2004, Mr. Pizi entered into a second convertible promissory note in the face amount of $15,000 which was converted into 12.62 shares of our Series A-1 preferred stock. In addition, at the time of the loan, Mr. Pizi was granted warrants to purchase 90,118 shares of our common stock at $0.17 per share. Mr. Pizi has not elected to exercise these warrants and after the reverse stock ratio now owns 901 warrants for 901 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $17.

In March 2004, we entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. and Mrs. Landis in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bore interest at 1% per month, and was converted into 62.5 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. In addition, Mr. and Mrs. Landis were granted warrants to purchase 446,429 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.28 per share. As part of the Note and Warrant Offering, Mr. and Mrs. Landis elected to convert these warrants by loaning the Company the reduced exercise price.

In June 2004, we entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. and Mrs. Landis in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bore interest at 1% per month and was converted into 113.64 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. In addition, Mr. and Mrs. Landis were granted warrants to purchase 781,250 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.16 per share. As part of the Note and Warrant Offering, Mr. and Mrs. Landis elected to convert these warrants by loaning the Company the reduced exercise price.

In October 2004, we entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. and Mrs. Landis in the amount of $100,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bore interest at 1% per month and was converted into 400 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. In addition, Mr. and Mrs. Landis were granted 2,000,000 warrants to purchase our common stock exercisable at $0.10 per share. Mr. and Mrs. Landis elected not to exercise these warrants as part of the Note and Warrant Offering and after the reverse stock split ratio owns 20,000 warrants for 20,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $10.00.

In November 2004, we entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. and Mrs. Landis in the amount of $150,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bore interest at 1% per month and was converted into 750 shares of

62


Series A-1 Preferred Stock after the reverse stock split ratio. In addition, Mr. and Mrs. Landis were granted 1,875,000 warrants to purchase our common stock exercisable at $0.08 per share. Mr. and Mrs. Landis elected not to exercise these warrants as part of the Note and Warrant Offering and after the reverse stock split ratio now owns 18,750 warrants for 18,750 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $8.00.

In June 2004, we entered into a convertible promissory note with Fredric Mack, a former director of the Company, in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bore interest at 1% per month, and was converted into 54.69 shares of Series A-1 Preferred stock. In addition, Mr. Mack was granted warrants to purchase 390,625 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.32 per share. As part of the Note and Warrant Offering, Mr. Mack elected to convert these warrants by loaning the Company the reduced exercise price.

In April 2005, we entered into a convertible promissory note with Bruce Miller, a director of the Company, in the amount of $30,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bore interest at 1% per month and was converted into 60 shares of Series A-1 Preferred stock.

In July 2004, we entered into a convertible promissory note with Nicholas Hatalski, who until July 22, 2005 (during the period when the terms of the recapitalization plan were being negotiated and at the time of approval of the plan by our board of directors), was a director of the Company, in the amount of $25,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bore interest at 1% per month and was converted into 10.94 shares of Series A-1 Preferred stock. In addition, Mr. Hatalski was granted warrants to purchase 78,125 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.32 per share. Mr. Hatalski elected not to exercise these warrants as part of the Note and Warrant Offering and after the reverse stock split ratio now owns 781.25 warrants for 781.25 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $32.

All of such warrants expire three years from the date of grant.

Senior Reorganization Notes. From March 2004 to April 2005, directors and executive officers made the following loans to us for Senior Reorganization Notes: Mr. Pizi held $423,333 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 571,659 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share.

Mr. Landis held $327,860 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 442,345 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share.

Mr. Mack held, together with his affiliates, $88,122 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 112,205 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share.

Mr. Miller held, together with his affiliates, $77,706 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 114,597 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.20.

Mr. Atherton holds $20,000 of Senior Reorganization Notes which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 289,856 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.20.

Mr. Broderick, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, held $2,300 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase 3,222 shares ofour common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share, and options to purchase 12,609 shares of common stock under the Company’s stock option plan that will convert into options to purchase our common stock.

Convertible Bridge Notes. From July 2005 to November 2006, directors and executive officers made the following loans to us for Convertible Bridge Notes:

Mr. Pizi held $85,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bore interest at 10% and matured on September 15, 2005. These notes automatically converted into 680,000 shares of our common stock upon approval of the Plan of Recapitalization by stockholders.

Mr. Landis held $395,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bore interest at 10% and matured on various dates in 2005 and 2006. These notes automatically converted into 3,160,000 shares of our common stock upon approval of the Plan of Recapitalization by stockholders.

63


Mr. Mack held, together with his affiliates, $114,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured on various dates in 2005 and 2006. These notes automatically converted into 897,564 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Miller held, together with his affiliates, $120,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured on various dates in 2005 and 2006. These notes automatically converted into 947,273 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Hasenyager, a member of our Board of Directors, held $4,061 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured on September 15, 2005. These notes automatically converted into 32,485 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Percelay, a member of our Board of Directors, held $130,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured on various dates in 2005 and 2006. These notes automatically converted into 1,027,273 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Atherton, a member of our Board of Directors, held $15,000 of convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured during 2006. These notes automatically converted into 120,000 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Porciello, a member of our Board of Directors, held $10,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured during 2006. These notes automatically converted into 80,000 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE On November 24, 2003, Deloitte & Touche LLP resigned as the Company's independent public accountants.

During the two most recent fiscal years preceding such resignation, neither of Deloitte & Touche's reports on our financial statements contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, however, both reports contained qualifications as to uncertainty. During this same period, there were no qualifications as to audit scopechanges in or accounting principles, nor were there disagreements between the Company and Deloitte & Touche on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Deloitte & Touche, would have caused them to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their reports on the financial statements for such years. There were no reportable events as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. The Company has provided Deloitte & Touche with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and Deloitte & Touche has furnished the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC indicating agreement with the statements provided therein. On February 2, 2004, Level 8 Systems appointed Margolis & Company P.C. as the Company's newCompany’s independent public accountants.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

The following descriptions of certain provisions of theour certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Level 8. are necessarily general and do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to theour certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Level 8 which have been incorporated by reference herein. COMMON STOCK The

Common Stock

Our authorized capital stock of our company consists of 85225 million shares, of which 75215 million shares have been designated common stock, par value $.001 per share. As of May 10, 2004,April 15, 2007, there were 35,571,38338,930,184 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, held by approximately 232228 holders of record. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefore, subject to the dividend and liquidation rights of any preferred stock (as described below) that may be issued, and subject to the dividend restrictions in certain credit facilities and various other agreements. In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our company, the holders of common stock are entitled to share equally and ratably in our assets, if any, remaining after provision for payment of all debts and liabilities of the Company and satisfaction of the liquidation preference of any shares of preferred stock that may be outstanding. The holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemptive or conversion rights. The outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and nonassessable. 51 PREFERRED STOCK

Preferred Stock

Our company is authorized to issue 10 million shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per share. The board of directors of our company has authority, without stockholder approval, to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to determine the number of shares, designations, dividend rights, conversion rights, voting power, redemption rights, liquidation preferences and other terms of any such series. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing

64


desired flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock and the likelihood that such holders will receive dividend payments and payments upon liquidation and could have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of our company.

As of the date of this prospectus, 21,0001,763 shares have been designated as Series A 4%A-1 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock and noneall of which are currently outstanding; 30,000 shares have been designated outstanding.

Series B 4% Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, and none of which are currently outstanding; 11,570 shares have been designated Series A1 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, and none of which are currently outstanding; 30,000 shares have been designated Series B1 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, and none of which are currently outstanding; 11,570 shares have been designated Series A2 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, and none of which are currently outstanding; 30,000 shares have been designated Series B2 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, and none of which are currently outstanding; 11,570 shares have been designated Series A3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, all of which were issued October 25, 2002, and 1,571 of which are currently outstanding; 30,000 have been designated Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, all of which were issued October 25, 2002, and all of which all are currently outstanding; 1,600 shares have been designated Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, 1,590 of which were issued August 13, 2002 and 1,166 of which are currently outstanding; 3,705 shares have been designated Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, 3,530 of which were issued March 19, 2003 and 2,692 of which are currently outstanding. Each series ofA-1 preferred stock is entitled to vote on an as-converted basis, subject to certain conversion restrictions, as to all matters presented to the stockholders of the Company. DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES


Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable. LEGAL
LEGAL MATTERS

Certain legal matters in connection with the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus have been passed on for Level 8 Systems, Inc.us by Powell, Goldstein, FrazerGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & MurphyPeskoe LLP, Atlanta, Georgia. New York, New York.
EXPERTS
The financial statements for the yearyears ended December 31, 20032006 and 2005 have been audited by Margolis & Company P.C., independent auditors, and the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 included in this prospectus, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their reports appearing herein (which reports express an unqualified opinion and include an explanatory paragraph referring to the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern), and are included in reliance upon the report of such firmsfirm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. 52
AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can receive copies of such reports, proxy and information statements, and other information, at prescribed rates, from the Securities and Exchange Commission by addressing written requests to the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a Web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants such as Level 8 Systems,Cicero Inc. that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The address of the Securities and Exchange Commission Web site is http://www.sec.gov. We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares that we will issue in this offering. This prospectus is a part of the Registration Statement. This prospectus does not include all of the information contained in the Registration Statement. For further information about us and the securities offered in this prospectus, you should review the Registration Statement. You can inspect or copy the Registration Statement, at prescribed rates, at the Securities and Exchange Commission'sCommission’s public reference facilities at the addresses listed above. 53 Index to Financial Statements



INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Report of Independent Auditors' Reports Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2 & F-3
Financial Statements:
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 20022006 and 20032005 and for the years ended December 31, 2001,2002,2006, 2005, and 2003..................... F-4 Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of March 31, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2004....................... F-33 F-3

F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Level 8 Systems,
Cicero Inc. Princeton,
Farmingdale, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cicero Inc. (formerly Level 8 Systems, Inc.) and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2003,2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), comprehensive loss and cash flows, and comprehensive loss for the yearyears then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. audits.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with auditingthe standards generally accepted inof the United States of America.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Level 8 Systems,Cicero Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003,2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the yearyears then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company's recurring losses from operations and working capital deficiency raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ Margolis & Company P.C.


/s/ Margolis & Company P.C.
Certified Public Accountants


Bala Cynwyd, PA February 12, 2004 F-2 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Level 8 Systems, Inc. Princeton, New Jersey We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Level 8 Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), cash flows, and comprehensive loss for the two years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Level 8 Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the two years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company's recurring losses from operations and working capital deficiency raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Raleigh, North Carolina
March 28, 2003 F-3 16, 2007

F-2


CICERO INC.
(Formerly LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 2003 2002 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents .......................................................... $ 19 $ 199 Cash held in escrow ................................................................ 776 -- Assets of operations to be abandoned ............................................... 149 453 Trade accounts receivable, net ..................................................... 12 1,291 Receivable from related party ...................................................... -- 73 Notes receivable, net .............................................................. -- 867 Prepaid expenses and other current assets .......................................... 270 731 --------- --------- Total current assets ........................................................ 1,226 3,614 Property and equipment, net ........................................................... 26 162 Software product technology, net ...................................................... 4,063 7,996 Other assets .......................................................................... 47 80 --------- --------- Total assets ................................................................ $ 5,362 $ 11,852 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) Current liabilities: Short term debt .................................................................... $ 2,625 $ 2,893 Accounts payable ................................................................... 2,545 3,537 Accrued expenses: Salaries, wages, and related items ............................................... 508 107 Restructuring .................................................................... -- 772 Other ............................................................................ 1,613 1,332 Liabilities of operations to be abandoned .......................................... 451 916 Deferred revenue ................................................................... 39 311 --------- --------- Total current liabilities ................................................... 7,781 9,868 Long-term debt ........................................................................ 131 -- Warrant liability ..................................................................... 198 331 Senior convertible redeemable preferred stock ......................................... 3,355 -- Commitments and contingencies (Notes 19 and 20) Stockholders' equity (deficit): Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized ......... Series A3 - 10,070 shares issued and 4,070 and 10,070 shares outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, $1,000 per share liquidation preference (aggregate liquidation value of $4,070) ...................................... -- -- Series B3 - 30,000 shares issued and outstanding, $1,000 per share liquidation preference (aggregate liquidation value of $30,000) Series C - 1,590 shares issued and 1,340 and 1,590 outstanding at December 31, 2003 -- -- and 2002, respectively, $1,000 per share liquidation preference (aggregate liquidation value of $1,340) ................................................. -- -- Common stock, $0.001 par value, 85,000,000 and 60,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively; 26,645,062 and 19,202,763 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively ...................... 27 19 Additional paid-in-capital ......................................................... 206,149 202,916 Accumulated other comprehensive loss ............................................... (6) (717) Accumulated deficit ................................................................ (212,273) (200,565) --------- --------- Total stockholders' equity (deficit) ........................................ (6,103) 1,653 --------- --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) ........................ $ 5,362 $ 11,852 ========= =========
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

  
December 31,
2006
 
December 31,
2005
 
ASSETS
     
Current assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents $310 $29 
Assets of operations to be abandoned  80  131 
Trade accounts receivable, net  170  18 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  22  53 
Total current assets  582  231 
Property and equipment, net 
  15  10 
Total assets $597 $241 
        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
       
Current liabilities:       
Senior reorganization debt (Note 2)
 $-- $2,559 
Convertible bridge notes (Note 2)  --  1,760 
Short-term debt (Note 2)
  2,899  3,481 
Accounts payable  2,360  2,528 
Accrued expenses:       
Salaries, wages, and related items  1,012  1,036 
Other  1,732  2,193 
Liabilities of operations to be abandoned  435  490 
Deferred revenue  38  78 
Total current liabilities  8,476  14,125 
Long-term debt  33  131 
Senior convertible redeemable preferred stock (Note 2)
  --  1,061 
Total liabilities  8,509  15,317 
        
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 15 and 16)       
        
Stockholders' equity (deficit):       
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized.  --  -- 
Series A-1 - 1,763.5 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006, $500 per share liquidation preference (aggregate liquidation value of $880)  --  -- 
Series A3 - no shares outstanding at December 31, 2006, 10,070 shares issued and 1,571 shares outstanding at December 31, 2005 , $1,000 per share liquidation preference (aggregate liquidation value of $1,571)  --  -- 
Series B3 - no shares outstanding at December 31, 2006, 30,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005, $1,000 per share liquidation preference (aggregate liquidation value of $30,000)  --  -- 
Series C - no shares outstanding at December 31, 2006, 1,590 shares issued and 991 outstanding at December 31, 2005, $1,000 per share liquidation preference (aggregate liquidation value of $991)  --  -- 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 215,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2006, 85,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2005; 35,182,406 and 480,399 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively (Note 2)  35  48 
Additional paid-in-capital  226,407  210,594 
        
Accumulated deficit  (234,345) (225,715)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (9) (3)
Total stockholders' (deficit)  (7,912) (15,076)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $597 $241 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-4

F-3


CICERO INC.
( FormerlyLEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 2002 2001 --------- --------- --------- Revenue: Software ............................................... $ 102 $ 1,491 $ 1,658 Maintenance ............................................ 316 571 9,262 Services ............................................... 112 1,039 6,437 --------- --------- --------- Total operating revenue .......................... 530 3,101 17,357 --------- --------- --------- Cost of revenue: Software ............................................... 4,152 7,396 14,800 Maintenance ............................................ 373 181 3,249 Services ............................................... 908 900 5,487 --------- --------- --------- Total cost of revenue ............................ 5,433 8,477 23,536 --------- --------- --------- Gross margin (loss) ...................................... (4,903) (5,376) (6,179) --------- --------- --------- Operating expenses: Sales and marketing .................................... 1,680 2,808 11,042 Research and product development ....................... 1,017 1,902 5,365 General and administrative ............................. 2,558 3,935 9,630 Amortization of intangible assets ...................... -- -- 6,259 Impairment of intangible assets ........................ -- -- 7,929 (Gain)/loss on disposal of assets ...................... 415 461 (6,345) Restructuring, net ..................................... (834) 1,300 8,650 --------- --------- --------- Total operating expenses ......................... 4,836 10,406 42,530 --------- --------- --------- Loss from operations ..................................... (9,739) (15,782) (48,709) --------- --------- --------- Other income (charges): Interest income ........................................ 33 180 820 Interest expense ....................................... (196) (471) (4,346) Other-than-temporary decline in fair value of marketable securities ............................................ -- -- (3,845) Change in fair value of warrant liability .............. 133 2,947 (885) Other expense .......................................... (105) (171) (594) -------- --------- --------- (135) 2,485 (8,850) -------- --------- --------- Loss before provision for income taxes ................... (9,874) (13,297) (57,559) Income tax provision (benefit) ........................... -- (155) 501 -------- --------- --------- Loss from continuing operations .......................... (9,874) (13,142) (58,060) Loss from discontinued operations ........................ (132) (5,040) (47,075) --------- --------- --------- Net loss ................................................. ($ 10,006) ($ 18,182) ($105,135) ========= ========= ========= Preferred dividends .................................... -- -- 926 Accretion of preferred stock and deemed dividends ...... 1,702 995 -- --------- --------- --------- Net loss applicable to common stockholders ............... ($ 11,708) ($ 19,177) ($106,061) ========= ========= ========= Loss per share: Loss from continuing operations - basic and diluted ... ($ 0.54) ($ 0.75) ($ 3.70) Loss from discontinued operations - basic and diluted . -- (0.27) (2.95) --------- --------- --------- Net loss applicable to common stockholders - basic and ... ($ 0.54) ($ 1.02) ($ 6.65) diluted ========= ========= ========= Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted .................................................. 21,463 18,877 15,958 --------- --------- ---------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

  
Years Ended December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005  
 
2004
 
Revenue:       
Software 
 $208 $407 $239 
Maintenance 
  120  147  306 
Services  
  644  231  230 
Total operating revenue  972  785  775 
Cost of revenue:  
          
Software 
  9  16  4,478 
Maintenance 
  212  350  382 
Services  
  546  822  1,015 
Total cost of revenue  767  1,188  5,875 
Gross margin (loss)  
  205  (403) (5,100)
Operating expenses:          
Sales and marketing 
  346  627  1,088 
Research and product development  
  533  891  1,111 
General and administrative 
  1,206  1,137  1,522 
Write-off of intangible assets 
  -  -  587 
(Gain) on disposal of assets 
  (24) -  (5)
Total operating expenses  2,061  2,655  4,303 
Loss from operations 
  (1,856) (3,058) (9,403)
Other income (charges):          
Interest expense 
  (853) (593) (264)
Change in fair value of warrant liability 
  -  -  198 
Other expense 
  (288) (30) (262)
   (1,141) (623) (328)
Loss from continuing operations 
  (2,997) (3,681) (9,731)
Loss from discontinued operations 
  -  -  (30)
Net loss   
 $(2,997)$(3,681)$(9,761)
           
Accretion of preferred stock and deemed dividends 
  5,633  -  - 
Net loss applicable to common stockholders 
 $(8,630)$(3,681)$(9,761)
Loss per share:          
Net loss applicable to common stockholders - basic and diluted 
 $(0.25)$(8.27)$(27.11)
           
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted 
  35,182  445  360 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-5

F-4


CICERO INC.
(Formerly LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (IN THOUSANDS)
COMMON STOCK PREFERRED STOCK SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT ------- ------- ------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2000............................................ 15,786 $ 16 42 $ -- Shares issued as compensation........................................... 369 -- Preferred stock dividend................................................ Reclassification of warrant liability................................... Foreign currency translation adjustment................................. Reclassification of unrealized loss included in income-other than temporary decline....................................................... Unrealized losses on marketable securities.............................. Net loss................................................................ ------- ------- ------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2001............................................ 16,155 16 42 -- Shares issued as compensation........................................... 108 -- Shares issued in private placement of common stock...................... 2,382 3 Shares issued for litigation settlement................................. 142 -- Shares issued for Cicero license agreement ............................. 250 -- Shares forfeited for repayment of notes receivable ..................... (15) -- Shares issued in private placement of series C preferred -- 2 Conversion of preferred shares to common................................ 181 -- (2) Warrants issued for financing........................................... Accretion of preferred stock............................................ Deemed dividend......................................................... Foreign currency translation adjustment................................. Net loss.................................................................. ------- ------- ------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2002............................................ 19,203 19 42 -- Conversion of preferred shares to common................................ 1,378 1 (6) Shares issued as compensation........................................... 95 -- Shares issued for bank guarantee........................................ 150 -- Exercises of stock options.............................................. 27 -- Conversion of warrants.................................................. 3,352 4 Conversion of senior convertible redeemable preferred stock............. 546 1 Accretion of preferred stock............................................ Shares issued in private placement of common stock...................... 1,894 2 Deemed dividend......................................................... Foreign currency translation adjustment................................. Reclassification of unrealized loss included in income.................. Net loss................................................................ ------- ------- ------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2003............................................ 26,645 $ 27 36 $ -- ------- ------- ------- ---------
ACCUMULATED ADDITIONAL OTHER PAID-IN ACCUMULATED COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL (DEFICIT) INCOME TOTAL ----------- ------------ ---------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2000......................................... $ 196,944 $ (75,327) $ (3,903) $ 117,730 Shares issued as compensation........................................ 1,199 1,199 Preferred stock dividend............................................. (926) (926) Reclassification of warrant liability................................ (2,100) (2,100) Foreign currency translation adjustment.............................. (287) (287) Reclassification of unrealized loss included in income-other than temporary decline.................................................... 3,765 3,765 Unrealized losses on marketable securities........................... (353) (353) Net loss............................................................. (105,135) (105,135) ----------- ------------ ---------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2001......................................... 196,043 (181,388) (778) 13,893 Shares issued as compensation........................................ 139 139 Shares issued in private placement of common stock................... 3,571 3,574 Shares issued for litigation settlement.............................. 270 270 Shares issued for Cicero license agreement .......................... 622 622 Shares forfeited for repayment of notes receivable .................. (21) (21) Shares issued in private placement of series C preferred 1,590 1,590 Conversion of preferred shares to common............................. -- -- Warrants issued for financing........................................ 373 (373) -- Accretion of preferred stock......................................... 329 (329) -- Deemed dividend...................................................... (293) (293) Foreign currency translation adjustment.............................. 61 61 Net loss............................................................. (18,182) (18,182) ----------- ------------ ---------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2002......................................... 202,916 (200,565) (717) 1,653 Conversion of preferred shares to common............................. -- 1 Shares issued as compensation........................................ 48 48 Shares issued for bank guarantee..................................... 51 51 Exercises of stock options........................................... 6 6 Conversion of warrants............................................... 402 406 Conversion of senior convertible redeemable preferred stock.......... 174 175 Accretion of preferred stock......................................... 640 (640) -- Shares issued in private placement of common stock................... 850 852 Deemed dividend...................................................... 1,062 (1,062) -- Foreign currency translation adjustment.............................. (6) (6) Reclassification of unrealized loss included in income............... 717 717 Net loss............................................................. (10,006) (10,006) ----------- ------------ ---------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2003......................................... $ 206,149 $ (212,273) $ (6) $$ (6,103) ----------- ------------ ---------- ---------
(in thousands)
  
Common Stock
 
Preferred Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
 
Accumulated
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income
   
  
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
(Deficit)
 
(Loss)
 
Total
 
Balance at December 31, 2003  26,645  
$
27
   
36
   
--
  
$
206,149
  $
(212,273
$(6$(6,103)
Conversion of preferred shares to common  824  1  (3)    --        1 
Shares issued as compensation  1,068  1        188        189 
Shares issued for bank guarantee  5,579  5        603        608 
Conversion of senior convertible redeemable preferred stock  3,792  4        1,210        1,214 
Shares issued in private placement of common stock  3,369  3        1,244        1,247 
Issuance of common stock from acquisition  2,027  2        748        750 
Foreign currency translation adjustment                    (2) (2)
Net loss                 
(9,761
)
    (9,761)
                          
Balance at December 31, 2004  43,304  43  
33
  
--
  
210,142
  
(222,034
)
 (8) 
(11,857
)
Conversion of preferred shares to common  395           --        -- 
Shares issued as compensation  961  2        101        103 
Shares issued for bank guarantee  2,400  2        45        47 
Conversion of senior convertible redeemable preferred stock  957  1        306        307 
Foreign currency translation adjustment                    5  5 
Net loss                 
(3,681
)
    (3,681)
Balance at December 31, 2005  48,017  
48
  33  
--
  210,594  (225,715) (3) (15,076)
Reverse stock split 100:1  (47,536) 
(48
)
 
(33
)
 
 
  48        -- 
Shares issued from conversion of senior reorganization debt  3,438  3        1,705        1,708 
Shares issued from conversion of convertible bridge notes  30,508  32        3,877        3,909 
Shares issued for bank guarantee  96           312        312 
Shares issued from short term debt conversion  224           190        190 
Shares issued from conversion of convertible promissory notes        2     992        992 
Conversion of senior convertible redeemable preferred stock              1,061        1,061 
Conversion of warrants  99           1,086        1,086 
Shares issued for interest conversion  211           629        629 
Shares issued as compensation  125           280        280 
Accretion of preferred stock              529  (529)    -- 
Deemed dividend              5,104  (5,104)    -- 
Foreign currency translation adjustment                    (6) (6)
Net loss                 (2,997)    (2,997)
Balance at December 31, 2006  35,182 
$
35
  2  
--
 $226,407 $(234,345)$(9)$(7,912)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-6

F-5


CICERO INC.
(Formerly LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 2003 2002 2001 --------- --------- --------- Net loss .................................................. ($ 10,006) ($ 18,182) ($105,135) --------- --------- --------- Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: Foreign currency translation adjustment ................ (6) (199) (287) Reclassification of accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments for dissolved subsidiaries .. -- 260 -- Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities ....... -- -- (353) Reclassification of unrealized loss included in income - other than temporary decline ........................ 717 -- 3,765 --------- --------- --------- Comprehensive loss ........................................ ($ 9,295) ($ 18,121) ($102,010) ========= ========= =========
(in thousands)

  
Years Ended December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
        
Net loss $(2,997)$(3,681)$(9,761)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:          
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (6) 5  
(2
)
Comprehensive loss $(3,003)$(3,676)$(9,763)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-7

F-6


CICERO INC.
(Formerly LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS)
2003 2002 2001 --------- --------- --------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss .................................................................. ($ 10,006) ($ 18,182) ($105,135) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization ........................................... 3,116 8,042 27,758 Change in fair value of warrant liability ............................... (133) (2,947) 885 Stock compensation expense .............................................. 48 139 1,199 Unrealized loss on marketable securities-other than temporary decline ... -- -- 3,845 Impairment of intangible assets and software product technology ......... 993 -- 46,923 Provision for doubtful accounts ......................................... (52) (477) 3,812 (Gain) loss on disposal of assets ....................................... (23) 461 (6,346) Other ................................................................... -- 98 (188) Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed: Trade accounts receivable and related party receivables .............. 1,404 352 10,454 Assets and liabilities held for sale - systems integration ....... -- 6,409 -- Assets and liabilities of operations to be abandoned ............. 101 473 -- Due from Liraz ....................................................... -- (56) (3) Prepaid expenses and other assets .................................... 420 803 834 Accounts payable and accrued expenses ............................ (351) (2,181) (5,284) Merger-related and restructuring ..................................... -- -- 952 Deferred revenue ..................................................... (273) (122) 657 --------- --------- --------- Net cash (used in) operating activities ............................. (4,756) (7,188) (19,637) --------- --------- --------- Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities ....................... -- 175 -- Purchases of property and equipment ....................................... (36) (11) (198) Cash payments secured through notes receivable ............................ -- -- (77) Repayment of note receivable .............................................. 867 2,460 675 Cash received from sale of property ....................................... -- -- 2,236 Cash received from sale of line of business assets ........................ -- 1,300 19,900 Additions to software product technology .................................. -- -- (2,310) --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by investing activities ........................... 831 3,924 20,226 --------- --------- --------- Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs ............ 859 1,974 -- Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares, net of issuance costs ......... -- 1,380 -- Proceeds from issuance of convertible redeemable stock, less escrow of $776 2,754 -- -- Proceeds from exercise of warrants ........................................ 406 -- -- Dividends paid for preferred shares ....................................... -- -- (1,345) Bank note guarantee ....................................................... -- -- 1,600 Payments under capital lease obligations and other liabilities ............ -- -- (133) Net borrowings on line of credit .......................................... -- -- 245 Borrowings under credit facility, term loans and notes payable ............ 980 381 -- Repayments of term loans, credit facility and notes payable ............... (1,248) (583) (24,000) --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities ................. 3,751 3,152 (23,633) --------- --------- --------- Effect of exchange rate changes on cash ..................................... (6) (199) (302) --------- --------- --------- Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ................................. (180) (311) (23,346) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year .............................. 199 510 23,856 --------- --------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year .................................... $ 19 $ 199 $ 510 ========= ========= ========= Cash paid (refunds) during the year for: Income taxes .............................................................. ($ 18) $ 117 $ 280 --------- --------- --------- Interest .................................................................. $ 218 $ 274 $ 1,339 --------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)

  
Years Ended December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Cash flows from operating activities:       
Net loss $(2,997)$(3,681)$(9,761)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization  12  11  4,287 
Change in fair value of warrant liability  --  
--
  (198)
Stock compensation expense  615  149  635 
Impairment of intangible assets and software product technology  --  --  587 
Provision (credit) for doubtful accounts  
60
  
(12
)
 (4)
Gain on disposal of assets  23  --  -- 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:          
Trade accounts receivable and related party receivables  (212) 146  (143)
Assets and liabilities of operations to be abandoned  (27) (29) 86 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  31  55  216 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  311  804  884 
Deferred revenue  (40) (7) 46 
Net cash (used in) operating activities  (2,224) (2,564) (3,365)
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Purchases of property and equipment  (17) (6) -- 
Net cash (used in) investing activities  (17) (6) -- 
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs  380  --  1,250 
Proceeds from exercise of warrants  --  --  112 
Borrowings under credit facility, term loans and notes payable  2,148  2,542  2,540 
Repayments of term loans, credit facility and notes payable  --  (55) (447)
Net cash provided by financing activities  2,528  2,487  3,455 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (6) 5  (2)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  281  (78) 88 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  29  107  19 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $310 $29 $107 
    
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION   
Cash paid (refunds) during the year for:          
Income taxes 
$
20
 
$
1
 
$
2
 
Interest 
$
865
 $645 $749 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-8

F-7


CICERO INC.
(Formerly LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities 2003

2006

During 2003,2006, the Company issued 161,438111,000 shares of common stock to vendors for outstanding liabilities valued at $73. Of this total, 66,667 shares or $25, were issued as part of the 1,894,444 shares issued in the October 2003 private placement. $237,000.

In November 2003,2006, the Company issued 150,00060,000 shares of common stock to Liraz Systems Ltd. as compensation for extension of a bank debt guaranty valued at $240,000.

In December 2006, the Company issued 224,000 shares of common stock to Liraz Systems Ltd. for its short term debt and interest of $191,000.

In December 2006, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to Brown Simpson Partners I, Ltd. as compensation for assisting in its recapitalization.

2005

During 2005, the Company issued 961,329 shares of common stock to vendors for outstanding liabilities valued at $103,000.

In November 2005, the Company issued 2,400,000 shares of common stock to a designated subsidiary of Liraz Systems Ltd. as compensation for extension of a bank debt guarantee valued at $51. $48,000.

During 2003,2005, the Company issued 546,875956,375 shares of Level 8 Systems common stock upon conversion of 1751,367 shares of Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. In October 2003, the Company issued 3,048,782 warrants to holders

During 2005, 150 shares of the Series A3C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock and Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock under an existing agreement and in consideration for the waiverwere converted into 394,737 shares of certain price protection anti-dilution provisions of the Series A3 Preferred Stock and Series B3 Preferred Stock agreements. The warrants have a strike price of $0.40 valued at $1,062. (See Note 11.) In April 2003, the Company agreed to exchange the warrants issued in the January 2002 private placement priced at $2.50 each for new warrants priced at $0.60 each and has extended the expiration date to until March 2007. This exchange was made as a result of a waiver by such warrant holders of certain terms and conditions that would trigger payments by the Company if the Company did not keep such shares registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 2002 Level 8 Systems common stock.

2004

During 2002,2004, the Company issued 109,672600,948 shares of common stock to employeesvendors for retention bonuses and severance. The bonus wasoutstanding liabilities valued at $92. (See Note 11.) In January 2002, the$92,000. The Company extended the exclusive, perpetual license to develop and sell the Cicero application integration software and obtain ownership of the registered trademark from Merrill Lynch in exchange for 250,000also issued 466,668 shares of common stock. Total consideration wasstock to contractors for compensation valued at $622. (See Note 6.) $47,000.

In June 2002,January 2004, the Company acquired substantially all assets and certain liabilities of a federally certified encryption software company. The Company issued 2,027,027 shares of common stock valued at $750,000.

During 2004, the Company issued 141,6584,092,000 shares of common stock to a former resellerdesignated subsidiary ofLiraz Systems Ltd. as compensation for extension of a bank debt guarantee valued at $447,000. 

In October 2004, 750 shares of Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock were redeemed in return for $775,000 as a condition of escrow in the event that a joint venture for the Asian market was not formed or operational by July 17, 2003. Such redemption was concluded in November 2004 and the escrowed proceeds, including $4,000 of interest, were distributed back to the holders of Series D Preferred Stock. During 2004, the Company as partissued 3,791,999 shares of a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement was valued at $270. In August 2002, as partLevel 8 Systems common stock upon conversion of the1,213 shares of Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock.

During 2004, 179 shares of Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock offering, ("Series C Preferred Stock") the Company exchanged approximately $150 of indebtedness to Anthony Pizi, the Chairman of the Company, for Series C Preferred Stock. In August 2002, the Company completed an exchange of 11,570were converted into 523,684 shares of Series A1 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A1 Preferred Stock") and 30,000 shares of Series B1 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B1 Preferred Stock") for 11,570 shares of Series A2 Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A2 Preferred Stock") and 30,000 shares of Series B2 Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series B2 Preferred Stock"), respectively. (See Note 11.) F-9 Level 8 Systems common stock.

In October 2002, the Company completed an exchange of all of the outstanding shares of Series A2 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A2 Preferred Stock") and Series B2 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B2 Preferred Stock") and related warrants for an equal number of shares of newly created Series A3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A3 Preferred Stock") and Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B3 Preferred Stock") and related warrants. This exchange was affected to correct a deficiency in the conversion price from the prior exchange of Series A1 and B1 Preferred Stock and related warrants for Series A2 and B2 Preferred Stock and related warrants. (See Note 11.) In December 2002,May 2004, the Company issued 1,462,801 warrants to holders of the Series A3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock and Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock under an existing agreement and in consideration for the waiver of certain price protection anti-dilution provisions of the Series A3 Preferred Stock and Series B3 Preferred Stock agreements. The warrants have a strike price of $0.40. (See Note 11.) In December 2002, the Company received $744 and $617 in notes receivable related to the sale of assets related to Systems Integration segment products. (See Note 2.) 2001 During 2001, the Company issued 369,591135,135 shares of common stock to employees for retention bonuses, severance and consulting. These amounts were valued at $1,199. (See Note 11.) In September and October 2001, the Company received $400 and $1,000 in notes receivable related to the sale of Message Queuing/XIPC and AppBuilder assets, respectively. (See Note 2.) During 2001, the Company recorded a $3,765 unrealized loss on marketable securities related to an other-than-temporary decline in fair value. During 2001, the Company performed consulting services valued at $750 in exchange for common sharesconversion of a strategic partner. In September 2001, the Company retired a note receivable from a related party, (director and officer) totaling $495 in exchange for the forfeiture of certain retirement benefits. On October 16, 2001, the Company completed an exchange of 11,570 shares of Series A 4% Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") and 30,000 shares of Series B 4% Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred Stock") for 11,570 shares of Series A1 Preferred Stock and 30,000 shares of Series B1 Preferred Stock, respectively. (See Note 11.) F-10 $50,000 convertible note.

F-8


CICERO INC.
(Formerly LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except share and per share data) NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS, SIGNIGICANT

NOTE 1.
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS, SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Cicero Inc., formerly Level 8 Systems, Inc. ("Level 8"(''Cicero®'' or the "Company"''Company''), is a global provider of business integration software thatwhich enables organizations to integrate new and existing information and processes at the desktop. Business integration software addresses the emerging need for a company's information systems to deliver enterprise-wide views of the company's business information processes. GOING CONCERN:

Going Concern:

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred aan operating loss of $10,006approximately $2,997,000 for the year ended December 31, 20032006 and has experienced negative cash flows from operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2003, 20022006, 2005 and 2001.2004. At December 31, 2003,2006, the Company had a working capital deficiency of approximately $6555.$7,894,000. The Company'sCompany’s future revenues are entirely dependent on acceptance of a newly developed and marketed product, Cicero,Cicero®, which has had limited success in commercial markets to date. These factors among others raise substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time time.

The financial statements presented herein do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should Level 8the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. In order to address these issues and to obtain adequate financing for the Company'sCompany’s operations for the next twelve months, the Company is actively promoting and expanding its Cicero-relatedCicero®-related product line and continues to negotiate with significant customers thatwho have begun or finalizedexpressed interest in the "proof of concept" stage with the CiceroCicero® software technology. The Company is experiencing difficulty increasing sales revenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about the financial viability of the Company. Cicero® software is a new “category defining” product in that most Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) projects are performed at the server level and Cicero®’s integration occurs at the desktop without the need to open and modify the underlying code for those applications being integrated. Many companies are not aware of this new technology or tend to look toward more traditional and accepted approaches. The Company is attempting to addresssolve the financial concernsformer problem by improving the market’s knowledge and understanding of potential customers by pursuing strategic partnerships with companies that have significant financial resources, althoughCicero® software through increased marketing and leveraging its limited number of reference accounts while enhancing its list of resellers and system integrators to assist in the sales and marketing process. Additionally, the Company has not experienced significant successis seeking additional equity capital or other strategic transactions in the near term to date with this approach.provide additional liquidity. In January 2004, the Company completedannounced a private placementNote and Warrant Offering in which warrant holders of itsthe Company’s common stock wherein itwere offered a one-time conversion of their existing warrants at a conversion price of $0.10 per share as part of a recapitalization plan. Under the terms of the Offer, warrant holders who elect to convert, would tender their conversion price in cash and receive a Note Payable in exchange. Upon approval of the recapitalization plan at a Shareholders meeting, these Notes would convert into common shares of the Company. The Company raised approximately $1,247a total of new capital.$2,559,000 from the Note and Warrant Offering. During 2005 and 2006, the Company also entered into several Convertible Bridge Notes with a consortium of investors. The Company raised a total of $3,915,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes. The Convertible Bridge Notes convert into common stock of the Company upon approval of the recapitalization plan. The Recapitalization was approved by stockholders at a special meeting on November 16, 2006. Management expects that it will be able to raise additional capital, post stockholder approval of the recapitalization plan, and to continue to fund operations and also expects that increased revenues will reduce its operating losses in future periods, however, there can be no assurance that management'smanagement’s plan will be executed as anticipated. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION:

Principles of Consolidation:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. See Note 2 regarding the sales of subsidiaries. All of the Company's subsidiaries are wholly-owned for the periods presented.

All significant inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. USE OF ESTIMATES:

F-9


Use of Estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates. F-11 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

Financial Instruments:
The carrying amount of the Company'sCompany’s financial instruments, representing accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable and debt approximate their fair value. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION:

Foreign Currency Translation:

The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders' equity. Statements of operations items are translated at average rates of exchange during each reporting period.

Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase. For these instruments, the carrying amount is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value. The Company places substantially all cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions in both the United States and several foreign countries.financial. At times, such cash and cash equivalents in the United States may be in excess of FDIC insurance limits. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

Trade Accounts Receivable:

Trade accounts receivable are stated in the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. Management provides for probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to a valuation allowance based on its assessment of the current status of individual accounts. Balances that are still outstanding after management has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to trade accounts receivable. Changes in the valuation allowance have not been material to the financial statements.

Property and Equipment:

Property and equipment purchased in the normal course of business is stated at cost, and property and equipment acquired in business combinations is stated at its fair market value at the acquisition date. All property and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives.

Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of property and equipment are removed from the accounts upon retirement or other disposition and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS:

Software Development Costs:

The Company capitalizes certain software costs after technological feasibility of the product has been established. Generally, an original estimated economic life of three years is assigned to capitalized software costs, once the product is available for general release to customers. Costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are charged to research and development expense.

Additionally, the Company has recorded software development costs for its purchases of developed technology through acquisitions. (See Note 6.3.)

F-10


Capitalized software costs are amortized over related sales on a product-by-product basis using the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product. (See Note 6.)

The establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing assessment of recoverability of capitalized software development costs requiresrequire considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors, including, but not limited to, technological feasibility, anticipated future gross revenue, estimated economic life and changes in software and hardware technologies. F-12 LONG-LIVED ASSETS:

Long-Lived Assets:

The Company reviews the recoverability of long-lived intangible assets when circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. This evaluation is based on various analyses including undiscounted cash flow projections. In the event undiscounted cash flow projections indicate impairment, the Company would record an impairment based on the fair value of the assets at the date of the impairment. Effective January 1, 2002, theThe Company accounts for impairments under the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FSAB"FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets"Assets”. Prior to the adoption of this standard, impairments were accounted for using SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" which was superceded by SFAS No. 144. During 2003,2004 the Company recorded impairments associated with its Cicero technology. During 2002, the Company recorded impairments associated with the sale of the GenevaCicero® technology and Star SQL and CTRC operations. (See Note 6.) REVENUE RECOGNITION: for its Ensuredmail technology acquired in 2004.

Revenue Recognition:

The Company recognizes license revenue from end-users and third party resellers in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-2, "Software“Software Revenue Recognition"Recognition”, as amended by SOP 98-9, "Modification''Modification of SOP 97-2, 'Software Revenue Recognition,' with Respect to Certain Transactions"Transactions''. The Company reviews each contract to identify elements included in the software arrangement. SOP 97-2 and SOP 98-9 require that an entity recognize revenue for multiple element arrangements by means of the "residual method"''residual method'' when (1) there is vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE"(''VSOE'') of the fair values of all of the undelivered elements that are not accounted for by means of long-term contract accounting, (2) VSOE of fair value does not exist for one or more of the delivered elements, and (3) all revenue recognition criteria of SOP 97-2 (other than the requirement for VSOE of the fair value of each delivered element) are satisfied. VSOE of the fair value of undelivered elements is established on the price charged for that element when sold separately. Software customers are given no rights of return and a short-term warranty that the products will comply with the written documentation. The Company has not experienced any product warranty returns.

Revenue from recurring maintenance contracts is recognized ratably over the maintenance contract period, which is typically twelve months. Maintenance revenue that is not yet earned is included in deferred revenue. Any unearned receipts from service contracts result in deferred revenue.
Revenue from consulting and training services is recognized as services are performed. Any unearned receipts from service contracts result in deferred revenue. COST OF REVENUE:

Cost of Revenue:

The primary components of the Company's cost of revenue for its software products are software amortization on internally developed and acquired technology, royalties on certain products, and packaging and distribution costs. The primary component of the Company's cost of revenue for maintenance and services is compensation expense. ADVERTISING EXPENSES:

Advertising Expenses:

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses were approximately $9, $53,$88,000, $16,000, and $1,198$7,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 20022006, 2005 and 2001,2004, respectively. RESEARCH AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT:

Research and Product Development:

Research and product development costs are expensed as incurred. F-13 INCOME TAXES:

Income Taxes:

The Company uses SFAS No. 109, "Accounting''Accounting for Income Taxes"Taxes'', to account for income taxes. This statement requires an asset and liability approach that recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax

F-11


consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, all expected future events, other than enactments of changes in the tax law or rates, are generally considered. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is "more''more likely than not"not'' that recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized. (See Note 9.8.) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: During

Stock Split:

As discussed in Note 2, the third quarterCompany’s stockholders approved a 100 to 1 reverse stock split in November 2006. The Company retained the current par value of 2002,$.001 per share for all common shares. All references in the Company made a decisionfinancial statements and notes to disposethe number of shares outstanding, per share amounts, and stock option data of the Systems Integration segment and entered into negotiations with potential buyers. The Systems Integration segment qualified for treatment as a discontinued operation in accordance with SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", and the Company reclassified the results of operations for the Systems Integration segment in 2002 and 2001 to "loss from discontinued operations" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2001 has notCompany’s common shares have been restated to reflect the discontinued operations as the information is not available and is impractical to obtain. The saleeffect of the Systems Integration segment was completed in December 2002. (See Note 2.) LOSS PER SHARE: reverse stock split for the periods presented.

Loss Per Share:

Basic loss per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and any potentially dilutive securities. During 2003, 2002,2006, 2005, and 2001,2004, potentially dilutive securities included stock options, warrants to purchase common stock, and preferred stock.

The following table sets forth the potential shares that are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 2003 2002 2001 ---------- ---------- ---------- Stock options . 5,625,878 3,834,379 4,366,153 Warrants ...... 10,926,706 5,315,939 2,568,634 Preferredpresented. The amounts have been restated in accordance with SAB Topic 4 (c ) to reflect the adjustment to the Company’s capitalization as a result of the 100:1 reverse stock 16,893,174 7,812,464 3,782,519 ---------- ---------- ---------- 33,445,758 16,962,782 10,717,306 ========== ========== ========== split which was approved by the Company in November 2006:

  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Stock options  45,315  59,009  74,886 
Warrants  323,623  193,761  199,534 
Preferred stock  1,763,478  85,046  98,557 
   2,132,416  337,816  372,977 

In 20032006, 2005 and 2002,2004, no dividends were declared on preferred stock.

Stock-Based Compensation:

During 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R”), “Share-Based Payment”, which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. In 2001, dividends totaled $926,January 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107, which provides supplemental implementation guidance for SFAS No. 123R. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and were included ininstead generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. The Company uses the loss per share calculations. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock-based awards under SFAS No. 123R, consistent with that used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. The Company has adoptedelected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123R and, accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123R. The modified prospective transition method requires that stock-based compensation expense be recorded for all new and unvested stock options that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered beginning on the first day of the Company’s year ended December 31, 2006. Stock-based compensation expense for awards granted prior to 2006 is based on the grant-date fair-value as determined under the pro forma provisions of SFAS No. 123. The Company did not grant options during 2006, therefore there were no diluted earnings per common share due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company measured compensation expense for its employee stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25. The Company

F-12


applied the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 "Accountingas amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation"Compensation - Transition and Disclosure”, and hasas if the fair-value-based method had been applied Accounting Principles Boardin measuring compensation expense. Under APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issuedwhen the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options was equal to Employees", and related Interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Had compensation cost for the Company'smarket price of the underlying stock option plans been determined based on the fair value atdate of the grant, dates for awards underno compensation expense was recognized.

The following table illustrates the plans, consistent with the method required by SFAS No. 123, the Company'seffect on net loss and diluted net loss per common share would have beenas if the pro forma amounts indicated below.
2003 2002 2001 --------- --------- --------- Net loss applicable to common stockholders, as reported ...... ($ 11,708) $ (19,177) ($106,061) Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects ............................................... (1,016) (3,387) (2,735) --------- --------- --------- Pro forma loss applicable to common stockholders ............. ($ 12,724) ($ 22,564) ($108,796) ========= ========= ========= Loss per share: Basic and diluted, as reported ............................. $ (0.54) $ (1.02) $ (6.65) Basic and diluted, pro forma ............................... $ (0.59) $ (1.20) $ (6.82)
F-14 Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based compensation during 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):

  
Years Ended December 31,
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
Net loss applicable to common stockholders, as reported 
$
(3,681
)
$
(9,761
)
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects  (180) (777)
        
Pro forma loss applicable to common stockholders 
$
(3,861
)
$
(10,538
)
        
Loss per share:       
Basic and diluted, as reported 
$
(8.27
)
$
(27.11
)
Basic and diluted, pro forma 
$
(8.68
)
$
(29.27
)

The fair value of the Company's stock-based awards to employees was estimated as of the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, using the following weighted-average assumptions: 2003 2002 2001 ---- ---- ---- Expected life (in years) 8.33 years 10 years 5 years Expected volatility .... 126% 96% 90% Risk free interest rate 4.00% 4.25% 4.50% Expected dividend yield 0% 0% 0% WARRANTS LIABILITY:

  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
        
Expected life (in years)  3.6 years  6.0 years  4.19 years 
Expected volatility  140% 149% 138%
Risk free interest rate  4.93% 4.48% 4.75%
Expected dividend yield  0% 0% 0%


Warrants Liability:

The Company hashad issued warrants to Series A3 and Series B3 preferred stockholders which contain provisions that allow the warrant holders to force a cash redemption for events outside the control of the Company. The fair value of the warrants are accounted for as a liability and are re-measured through the Consolidated Statements of Operations at each balance sheet date. RECLASSIFICATIONS: As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair value of these warrants was $0.

Reclassifications:

Certain prior year amounts in the accompanying financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 20032006 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net incomeloss or stockholder's equity. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS: stockholders’ deficit.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 or FIN 46"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities", an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements". In October 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 46-6, "Effective Date of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" deferring the effective date for applying the provisions of FIN 46 for public entities' interests in variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 for financial statements of interim or annual periods that end after December 15, 2003. FIN 46 establishes accounting guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities that function to support the activities of the primary beneficiary. In December 2003,July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 46 (revised December 2003), "ConsolidationNo. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - An Interpretation of Variable Interest Entities." This revised interpretation isSFAS No. 109”. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN No. 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN No. 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The provisions of FIN No. 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption of this standard. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit (or other appropriate components of equity) for that

F-13


fiscal year. The provisions of FIN No. 48 are effective for all entities no later thanfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is evaluating the endimpact of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. The Company has no investment in or contractual relationship or other business relationship with a variable interest entity and thereforeadoption of FIN 48 but does not currently expect the adoption of this interpretation did not have any impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, if the Company enters into any such arrangement with a variable interest entity in the future or an entity with which we have a relationship is reconsidered based on guidance in FIN 46new standard to be a variable interest entity, the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations might be materially impacted. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity". SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. Some of the provisions of this Statement are consistent with the current definition of liabilities in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, "Elements of Financial Statements". The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company'sour financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulleting (“SAB”) 108, to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial condition. F-15 In December 2002,statement misstatements. SAB 108 requires that the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an AmendmentCompany quantify misstatements based on their impact on each of FASB Statement No. 123." This Statement amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interimits financial statements about the methodand related disclosures. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company has adopted SAB 108 effective as of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. This statement requires that companies having a year-end after December 15, 2002 follow the prescribed format and provide the additional disclosures in their annual reports.31, 2006. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition. In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities". This statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statementbulletin did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial condition. NOTE 2. DISPOSITIONS SALE OF GENEVA: Effective October 1, 2002,statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by the Company soldin the first quarter of 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (“SFAS 123R”).  SFAS 123R addresses the accounting for share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options.  Under the new standard, companies will no longer be able to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”.  Instead, companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the expense in the consolidated statements of operations.  SFAS 123R is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and allows, but does not require, companies to restate the full fiscal year of 2005 to reflect the impact of expensing share-based payments under SFAS 123R.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock-based awards under SFAS No. 123R, consistent with that used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. The Company has elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123R and, accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123R. The modified prospective transition method requires that stock-based compensation expense be recorded for all new and unvested stock options that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered beginning on the first day of the Company’s year ended December 31, 2006. Stock-based compensation expense for awards granted prior to 2006 is based on the grant-date fair-value as determined under the pro forma provisions of SFAS No. 123. The Company recognized incremental stock-based compensation expense of $14,000 during 2006 as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.


NOTE 2.
RECAPITALIZATION

In November 2006, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to provide the Company’s Board of Directors with discretionary authority to effect a reverse stock split ratio from 20:1 to 100:1 and on November 20, 2006, the Board of Directors set that reverse stock ratio to be 100:1. In addition, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to change the name of the Company from Level 8 Systems, Inc. to Cicero Inc., to increase the authorized common stock of the Company from 85 million shares to 215 million shares and to convert existing preferred shares into a new Series A-1 preferred stock of Cicero Inc. The proposals at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of Level 8 comprised a proposed recapitalization of Level 8 which was also subject to the receipt of amendments to outstanding convertible promissory notes, senior reorganization notes and the convertible bridge notes.

As part of the plan of recapitalization, Senior Reorganization Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,559,000 to Senior Reorganization Noteholders who had loaned funds to the Company in exchange for Senior Reorganization Notes and Additional Warrants at a special one-time exercise price of $0.10 per share, (i) will receive and have automatically exercised Additional Warrants exercisable into shares of Common Stock, by applying the accrued interest on their Senior Reorganization Notes and by cashless exercise to the extent of the balance of the exercise

F-14


price, (ii) if a holder of existing warrants who advanced the exercise price of their warrants to the Company, will have their existing warrants automatically exercised and (iii) those Senior Reorganization Noteholders who loaned the Company the first $1,000,000 in respect of the exercise price of their existing warrants will receive Early Adopter Warrants of the Company at a ratio of 2:1 for shares issuable upon exercise of each existing warrant exercised at the special exercise price of $10.00 per share. At the time of issuance of the Senior Reorganization Notes, the trigger for conversion into exercisable warrants was an anticipated recapitalization merger. Since the recapitalization plan was amended, the Company solicited Senior Noteholders for their consent to convert upon approval of the plan of recapitalization by stockholders. Approximately $2,309,000 of the Senior Reorganization Noteholders have consented to the change in the “trigger” and have cancelled their notes and converted into 3,438,473 shares of the Company’s common stock.

In accordance with EITF 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios”, the Company has allocated the proceeds received from the Note and Warrant Offering between the warrants exercised and the future warrants granted and has employed the Black-Scholes valuation method to determine the fair value of the warrants exercised and the additional warrants issued. The Senior Reorganization Noteholders who have consented to convert their debt amounted to approximately $2,309,000. Of that amount, approximately $979,000 represents the exercise price of existing warrants that was loaned to the Company for which the warrant holders will receive both additional warrants and early adopter warrants. Using the Black-Scholes formula, the Company has determined that the fair value of the warrants granted to this tranche is approximately $440,000. The difference between the fair value of the additional warrants and the total invested in this tranche, or $539,000, is treated as a beneficial conversion and fully amortizable. The second tranche of investment that consisted of those warrant holders who loaned the exercise price of their existing warrants, and will receive additional warrants but no early adopter warrants, amounted to approximately $107,000. Using Black-Scholes, the Company has determined that the fair value of the warrants granted to this tranche is approximately $32,000 and the beneficial conversion amount is $75,000. The third tranche consisted of investors who had no existing warrants and will only receive additional warrants upon consummation of the Recapitalization. The total investment in this tranche is $1,223,000. Using Black-Scholes, the Company has determined that the fair value of the warrants granted to this tranche is approximately $570,000 and the beneficial conversion amount is $653,000. Since this beneficial conversion feature is immediately convertible upon issuance, the Company has fully amortized this beneficial conversion feature in the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Also as part of the recapitalization plan, Convertible Bridge Notes in the principal amount of $3,915,000 are automatically cancelled and converted into 30,508,448 shares of the Company’s common stock. Also in accordance with EITF 98-5, using the Black-Scholes formula, the Company has calculated the fair value of the common stock resulting from conversion of the Convertible Bridge Notes. Based upon that calculation, the fair value of the stock received was $195,000. The difference between the total of the Convertible Bridge Notes and the fair value of the stock ($3,720,000) is treated as a beneficial conversion. Since this beneficial conversion feature is immediately convertible upon issuance, the Company has fully amortized this beneficial conversion feature in the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The Company had issued $992,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Promissory Notes. As part of the recapitalization plan, these Noteholders were offered reduced conversion prices to convert their notes into shares of the Company’s new series A-1 preferred stock. All Noteholders have agreed to convert their notes into shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. The Company has cancelled these notes and issued 1,591 shares of its Systems IntegrationSeries A-1 preferred stock. In accordance with EITF 98-5 and specifically paragraph 8, the Company has utilized the Black-Scholes formula to determine the fair value of the stock received. The Company has calculated the fair value of the stock received to be $484,000 resulting in a beneficial conversion of $508,000. Since this beneficial conversion is immediately recognizable by the holders, the Company has fully amortized this conversion and recorded an accretion to preferred stock in the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Holders of the Company’s Series A-3, B-3, C and D preferred stock were offered reduced conversion rates on their existing preferred stock in exchange for shares in a new Series A-1 preferred stock for Cicero Inc. as part of the recapitalization plan. As a result of stockholder approval, the Company affected an exchange of existing preferred shares into 172.15 Series A-1 preferred shares. In exchange for the reduced conversion prices, holders of the series A-3, B-3 and D shares forfeited their anti-dilution protection along with certain other rights, ranks and privileges. The Company’s Series D preferred stock contained a redemption feature which required that the Company account for same as a liability. The Company’s Series A-1 preferred stock contains no redemption features and accordingly, upon exchange, the fair value of these shares were converted to equity. The Company employed the Black-Scholes

F-15


formula to value the shares exchanged and have determined that the reduced conversion prices and exchange has created a beneficial conversion of $21,000. As the new Series A-1 preferred shares are immediately convertible, the Company has recorded this beneficial conversion as a deemed dividend in the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.


NOTE 3.
ACQUISITIONS

In January 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail, a federally certified encryption software business to EM Software Solutions, Inc.company. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, EM Solutionsthe Company issued 2,027,027 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37. The total purchase price of the assets being acquired all rights, titleplus certain liabilities assumed was $750,000, and interesthas been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. The Company agreed to register the common stock for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The purchase price was allocated to the Geneva Enterprise Integratorassets acquired and Geneva Business Process Automator products along with certain receivables, deferred revenue, maintenance contracts, fixed assets and certain liabilities.liabilities assumed based on the Company’s estimates of fair value at the acquisition date. The Company had identified these assets as being held for sale duringassessed the third quarter of 2002 and, as such, reclassified the results of operations to "income/loss from discontinued operations". The Company received total proceeds of $1,637; $276 in cash, a short-term note in the amount of $744 and a five-year note payable monthly in the aggregate amount of $617. The short-term note was due by February 13, 2003 and was repaid subsequent to December 31, 2002. The five-year note was recorded net of an allowance of $494. The carryingrealizable value of the Ensuredmail software technology acquired and determined the purchase price exceeded the amounts allocated to the software technology acquired less liabilities assumed by approximately $587,000. This excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the assets soldacquired less liabilities assumed was approximately $374 resulting in a loss onallocated to goodwill, and, because it was deemed impaired, charged to the disposalStatements of discontinued operations of $769. RevenuesOperations for the Systems Integration segment were $3,700 in 2002 and $5,700 in 2001.year ended December 31, 2004. (See Note 6.) SALE OF STAR SQL AND CTRC: In June 2002, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with StarQuest Ventures, Inc., a California company and an affiliate of Paul Rampel, a former member of the Board of Directors of Level 8 Systems and a former executive officer. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Level 8 sold its Star SQL and CTRC products and certain fixed assets to StarQuest Ventures for $365 and the assumption of certain maintenance liabilities. The Company received $300 in cash and a note receivable of $65. The loss on sale of the assets was $74. The Company used $150 from the proceeds to repay borrowings from Mr. Rampel. SALE OF APPBUILDER ASSETS: On October 1, 2001, the Company sold its Geneva AppBuilder software business to BluePhoenix Solutions, a wholly owned subsidiary of Liraz Systems Ltd. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company sold the rights, title and interest in the AppBuilder product and certain receivables, unbilled, deferred revenue, maintenance contracts, fixed assets and certain liabilities. The AppBuilder product accounted for approximately 99% of total revenues for the year and approximately 85% of total revenues within the messaging and application engineering segment. The Company received total proceeds of $20,350; $19,000 in cash, a note receivable for $1,000 due February 2002 and a cash payment for the net assets. The carrying value of the net assets sold was approximately $15,450. The resulting gain of approximately $4,900 was recorded in the gain on disposal of asset. The Company subsequently repaid $22,000 of its short-term debt using the proceeds received and cash on hand. In March 2002, the $1,000 note was repaid with cash of $825 and settlement of other liabilities. At December 31, 2001, the $1,000 note was recorded as note receivable from related party and $863, including $57 classified as assets to be abandoned, was recorded as a receivable from a related party representing amounts due to the Company from BluePhoenix Solutions for the net asset amount noted above and the reimbursement for certain general and administrative expenses performed by the Company. F-16 SALE OF MESSAGE QUEUING AND XIPC ASSETS: Also during the quarter ended September 30, 2001, the Company sold two of its messaging products - Geneva Message Queuing and Geneva XIPC to Envoy Technologies, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, Envoy acquired all rights, title and interest to the products along with all customer and maintenance contracts. The Company retained all accounts receivable, received $50 in cash and a note receivable for $400. The resulting gain of $342 has been recorded in the gain on disposal of assets. ASSETS AND LIABILITIES TO BE ABANDONED: At December 31, 2002, the Company had made the decision to close its remaining foreign subsidiaries. In December 2002, the Company received notification of the finalization of the bankruptcy proceeding in France and recorded a gain on the closure of the subsidiary of $332 in Gain (loss) on disposal of assets. In March 2003, the Company received notification of the finalization of the bankruptcy proceeding in the United Kingdom and recorded a gain on the closure of the subsidiary of $216 in Gain (loss) on disposal of assets. In December 2003, the Company received notification of the liquidation of the Denmark subsidiary and the Company recorded a gain on the closure of the subsidiary of $62 in Gain (loss) on disposal of assets. NOTE 3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE


NOTE 4.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Trade accounts receivable was composed of the following at December 31: 2003 2002 ------- ------- Current trade accounts receivable ............ $ 20 $ 1,434 Less: allowance for doubtful accounts ........ (8) (143) ------- ------- $ 12 $ 1,291 ======= ======= Approximately $0 and $9 of current trade receivables were unbilled at December 31 2003 and 2002, respectively. (in thousands):

  
2006
 
2005
 
Current trade accounts receivable $230 $18 
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts  60  -- 
  $170 $18 


The (credit) provision for uncollectible amounts was $60,000, ($623)12,000), ($477) and $3,812($4,000) for the years ended December 31, 2003, 20022006, 2005, and 20012004, respectively. Write-offs (net of recoveries) of accounts receivable were ($488), ($437) and $6,0470) for the years ended December 31, 2003, 20022006, 2005 and 2001, respectively. Included in the write-offs for 2001 was approximately $3,800 from one customer who filed for Chapter 11 Protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy laws. NOTE 4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT 2004.


NOTE 5.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment was composed of the following at December 31: 2003 2002 ----- ----- Computer equipment ................................. $ 242 $ 206 Furniture and fixtures ............................. 8 8 Office equipment ................................... 138 138 ----- ----- 388 352 Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization .... (362) (190) ----- ----- $ 26 $ 162 ===== ===== 31 (in thousands):

  
2006
 
2005
 
Computer equipment $252 $246 
Furniture and fixtures  8  8 
Office equipment  149  140 
   409  394 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (394) (384)
        
  $15 $10 

Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment was $167, $402$12,000, $11,000, and $945$11,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002,2006, 2005, and 2001,2004, respectively. F-17 NOTE 5. NOTES RECEIVABLE As discussed in Note 2, in 2002 the Company disposed of the remaining assets of the Systems Integration segment through a sale to EM Software Solutions, Inc. As part of the proceeds, the Company received two notes receivable from the purchaser. The first note was due on February 13, 2003 in the amount of $744 and bore interest at prime plus 2.25%. This note was repaid in February 2003. The second note was in the principal amount of $617 and bears interest at prime plus 1%. Principal and interest is payable monthly and the note matures in 2007. Due to the uncertainty of the collection of the note at the time, the Company recorded the note net of an allowance of $494. As more fully discussed in Note 20, the Company had been party to litigation for breach of a real estate lease. That case was settled in August 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign the note receivable due from EM Software Solutions, with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the Note should the Note obligor default on future payments. The principal balance outstanding on the Note at the time of assignment was $545. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a weighted probability cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131. In addition, the Company wrote off the unreserved portion of the Note or $51. In conjunction with the sale of Profit Key on April 6, 1998, the Company received a note receivable from the purchaser for $2,000. The remaining balance on the note totaled $1,000 and was due in equal annual installments beginning on March 31, 2001. The note bore interest at 9% per annum. In 2002, the Company sold its remaining interest in the note to a group of investors including Nicholas Hatalski and Paul Rampel, both members of the Company's Board of Directors at the time, and Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman for $400, and recorded a loss on the sale of $100. NOTE 6. SOFTWARE PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY As of December 31, 2003, all of the Company's software product technology relates to the Cicero technology. Effective July 2002, the Company determined that the estimated asset life of the Cicero technology has been extended as a result of the January 2002 amended license agreement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch") wherein the exclusive right to modify, commercialize, and distribute the technology was extended in perpetuity. Accordingly, the Company reassessed the estimated life of the technology and extended it from three years to five years. The effect of the change in the estimated life resulted in a reduction of $4,608 and $2,407 of amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The impact on the net loss applicable to common stockholders - basic and diluted was $(0.21) per share for December 31, 2003 and $(0.13) per share for December 31, 2002.

F-16


NOTE 6.
SOFTWARE PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY

In accordance with FASBSFAS 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed",the Company periodically completed an assessment of the recoverability of the CiceroCicero® product technology as of September 30, 2003 and again at December 31, 2003.technology. This assessment was completedperformed during 2004, due to the Company'sCompany’s continued operating losses and the limited software revenue generated by the CiceroCicero® technology over the pastprevious twelve to eighteen months. Currently, theThe Company iswas in negotiations with numerous customers to purchase licenses, which would have a significant impact on the cash flows from the CiceroCicero® technology and the Company. Since the negotiations havehad been in process for several months and expected completion of the transactions hashad been delayed, the Company hashad reduced its cash flow projections. Historical cash flows generated by the CiceroCicero® technology do not support the long-lived asset and accordingly the Company has impaired the excess of the unamortized book value of the technology in excess of the expected net realizable value as of December 31, 2003. This impairment charge, in the amount of $993, has been recorded in cost of software revenue. During the third quarter of 2001, the Company reduced its carrying value by $3,070 of the capitalized software cost recorded as part of the StarQuest acquisition to its fair value based upon an evaluation of its net realizable value. In May 2002, based upon the potential sale of the assets to a third party, the Company determined that an additional impairment had occurred in the amount of $1,564, which was recorded as software amortization. The Company has been assessing its assets to determine which assets if any are to be considered non-strategic and, in May 2002, the Company received an unsolicited offer to purchase the Star/SQL and CTRC products. In June 2002, the Company sold the Star/SQL and CTRC asset. (See Note 2.) F-18 During the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company recognized $3,933 of which $993 is an impairment charge, and $7,375 and $11,600, respectively, of expense related to the amortization of these costs, which is recorded as cost of software revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. Accumulated amortization of capitalized software costs was $20,436 and $16,503 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. NOTE 7. IDENTIFIABLE AND UNIDENTIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS Identifiable and unidentifiable intangible assets primarily included goodwill, existing customer base, assembled workforce and trademarks recorded in connection with the Company's previous acquisitions. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had no identifiable and unidentifiable intangible assets. Pro forma net loss applicable to common stockholders as if the provisions of SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", had been adopted for the year ended December 31, 2001 would have been ($98,023). SALE OF SEER TECHNOLOGIES ASSETS (APPBUILDER):2004. This charge, in the amount of $2,844,000 was recorded as software amortization for the year ended December 31, 2004. As described in Note 2, Sale of AppBuilder Assets,December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company soldhas no capitalized costs for the intangible assets acquired from Seer Technologies to BluePhoenix Solutions (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Liraz Systems Ltd.)Cicero® technology.

Also in October 2001, which resulted in a net reduction of $11,052 in intangible assets. ASSET IMPAIRMENTS: During the quarter ended September 30, 2001, accordance with SFAS 86,the Company was notified by one of its resellers that they would no longer engage in re-sales of the Company's CTRC products acquired from StarQuest. This reseller accounted for substantially all of the product sales and as a result, the Company performedcompleted an assessment of the recoverability of the Message Application Engineering Segment. The resultsEnsuredmail product technology. This assessment was also completed during 2004, due to the Company’s revised cash flow projections from software revenue. These revised cash flow projections do not support the long-lived asset and accordingly the Company has impaired the excess of the Company's analysis of undiscounted cash flows indicated that an impairment had occurred. The Company estimated the fair marketunamortized book value of the related assets through a discounted future cash flow valuation technique. The resultstechnology in excess of this analysis indicated that the carrying valueexpected net realizable value. This charge, in the amount of these intangible assets exceeded their fair market values. The Company has reduced the carrying value of these intangible assets by approximately $10,999 as of September 30, 2001, of which $3,070$154,000, was recorded as software amortization costs. (See Note 6.) NOTE 8. SHORT TERM DEBT Short-termfor the year ended December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2005, the Company has no capitalized costs for the Ensuredmail software technology.


NOTE 7.
SHORT-TERM DEBT AND CONVERTIBLE NOTES

Notes payable, long-term debt, was composedand notes payable to related party consist of the following at December 31: 2003 2002 ------ ------ Term loan (a) ................................ $1,971 $2,512 Note payable; related party (b) .............. 85 -- Notes payable (c) ............................ 444 381 Short term convertible note (d) .............. 125 -- ------ ------ $2,625 $2,893 ====== ====== (a) 31(in thousands):

  
2006
 
2005
 
Term loan (a) $1,971 $1,971 
Note payable; related party (b)  9  9 
Notes payable (c)  950  509 
Short term convertible note (d)  --  265 
Short term convertible notes, related party (e)  --  727 
  $2,930 $3,481 


(a)The Company has a $1,971 term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.5% (approximately 6.38% at December 31, 2006). Interest is payable quarterly. There are no financial covenants and the term loan is guaranteed by Liraz Systems Ltd., the Company’s former principal stockholder. The loan matures on October 31, 2007. (See Note 14.)

(b)From time to time the Company borrowed money from the Company's Chief Information Officer. The notes bear interest at 12% per annum. As of December 31, 2006, the Company is indebted to Anthony Pizi, the Company’s former Chairman and CEO and current Chief Information Officer, in the amount of $9,000.

(c)The Company does not have a revolving credit facility and from time to time has issued a series of short term promissory notes with private lenders, which provide for short term borrowings both secured and unsecured by accounts receivable. In addition, the Company has settled certain litigation and agreed to a series of promissory notes to support the obligations. The notes bear interest between 10% and 12% per annum.

(d)The Company entered into convertible notes with private lenders. The notes bear interest between 12% and 18% per annum and allow for the conversion of the principal amount due into common stock of the Company. In April 2005, the Company entered into a convertible loan in the amount of $30,000 with a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. Under the term of this agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and was convertible upon the option of the note holder into 428,571 shares of our common stock at a conversion

F-17


price of $0.07 per share. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has a $1,971 term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1% (approximately 2.13% at December 31, 2003). Interest is payable quarterly. There are no financial covenantsoffered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 60 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the term loan is guaranteed by Liraz Systems Ltd.,Note has been cancelled. In May 2004, the Company's former principal shareholder.Company entered into convertible loans aggregating $185,000 from several investors including a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. Under the terms of these agreements, the loans bear interest between 1% and 1.5% per month and are convertible upon the option of the Noteholder into an aggregate of 578,125 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 578,125 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.32. The loan matures onwarrants expire three years from grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 80.94 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 8, 2004. (See Note 16.) (b) In December 2003,2006, the Noteholders consented to the amended conversion rate and the Notes have been cancelled. Also in March 2004, the Company entered into a promissory note withconvertible loan in the Company's Chairman. The Noteamount of $50,000. Under the terms of this agreement, the loan bears interest at 12%1% per annum. (c) Themonth and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 135,135 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 135,135 shares of our common stock at an exercisable price of $0.37 per share. All such warrants expire three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company is attemptinghas offered to secure a revolving credit facilitylower that conversion rate and on an interim basisexchange the note for 19.23 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and from time to timethe Note has issued a series of short term promissory notes with private lenders, which provides for short term borrowings both unsecured and secured by accounts receivable. The Notes bear interest at 12% per annum. (d) been cancelled.

(e)The Company entered into convertible promissory notes with Anthony Pizi, the Company’s Chief Information Officer and Mark and Carolyn Landis, who are related by marriage to Anthony Pizi, and Mr. Landis is the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors.

In December 2003,June 2004, the Company entered into a convertible loan agreement with Mr. Pizi in the amount of $100,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 270,270 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 270,270 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.37. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 14 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled. In July 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with a private lender. The NoteMr. Pizi in the face amount of $112,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 12%1% per annummonth and allowsis convertible upon the option of the note holder into 560,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 560,000 shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 78.4 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled. Also in July 2004, Mr. Pizi entered into a second convertible promissory note in the face amount of $15,000 which bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into 90,118 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 90,118 shares of our common stock at $0.17 per share. All such warrants expire three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 12.62 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

In March 2004, the Company entered into a convertible loan agreement with Mark and Carolyn Landis, in the principal amount dueof $125,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 446,429 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 446,429 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.28. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant. As part of the Company. Therecapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 62.5 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled. In June 2004, we entered into a convertible loan agreement with Mark and Carolyn Landis, in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and also is convertible at $0.28 per share. F-19 NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES Income tax expense were composedupon the option of the followingnote holder into 781,250 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 781,250 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.16. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 113.64 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled. In October 2004, the Company entered into a convertible loan agreement with Mark and Carolyn Landis in the amount of $100,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 1,000,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $0.10. The warrants expire in three

F-18


years. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 400 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled. In November 2004, the Company entered into a convertible loan agreement with Mark and Carolyn Landis in the amount of $150,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 1,875,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 1,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $0.08. All such warrants expire three years ended December 31: from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 750 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.


2003 2002 2001 ----------- ----------- ----------- Federal - current ...................... $ -- $ -- $ -- State and local - current .............. -- -- -- ----------- ----------- ----------- Foreign taxes (benefit) and withholdings -- (155) 501 ----------- ----------- ----------- Current taxes .......................... -- (155) 501 Federal - deferred ..................... -- -- -- State and local - deferred ............. -- -- -- ----------- ----------- ----------- Deferred taxes ......................... -- -- -- Total income tax provision (benefit) ... $ -- $ (155) $ 501 =========== =========== ===========
NOTE 8.
INCOME TAXES

A reconciliation of expected income tax at the statutory federal rate with the actual income tax provision is as follows for the years ended December 31:
2003 2002 2001 -------- -------- -------- Expected income tax benefit at statutory rate (34%) .... $ (3,402) $ (6,235) $(35,200) State taxes, net of federal tax benefit ................ (405) (358) (5,158) Effect of foreign operations including withholding taxes (31) (68) 801 Effect of change in valuation allowance ................ 3,769 6,362 37,076 Amortization and write-off of non-deductible goodwill .. -- -- 1,906 Non-deductible expenses ................................ 69 144 1,076 -------- -------- -------- Total ........................................ $ -- $ (155) $ 501 ======== ======== ========
31 (in thousands) :

  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Expected income tax benefit at statutory rate (34%) $(1,019)$(1,251)$(3,319)
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit.  (180) (308) (219)
Effect of foreign operations including withholding taxes  --  --  12 
Effect of change in valuation allowance  1,073  1,537  3,357 
Non-deductible expenses  126  22  169 
Total $-- $-- $-- 

Significant components of the net deferred tax asset (liability) at December 31 were as follows: 2003 2002 -------- -------- Current assets: Allowance for doubtful accounts .... $ 85 $ 41 Accrued expenses, non-tax deductible 200 200 Noncurrent assets: Loss carry forwards ................ 74,517 71,448 Depreciation and amortization ...... 5,709 4,486 -------- -------- 80,511 76,175 Less: valuation allowance ............. (80,511) (76,175) -------- -------- $ -- $ -- ======== ========

  
2006
 
2005
 
      
Current assets:     
Allowance for doubtful accounts $34 $4 
Accrued expenses, non-tax deductible  279  145 
Deferred revenue  15  31 
Noncurrent assets:       
Loss carryforwards  91,016  89,528 
Depreciation and amortization  5,931  6,746 
   97,275  96,454 
        
Less: valuation allowance  (97,275) (96,454)
        
  $-- $-- 

At December 31, 2003,2006, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $186,293,$227,539,000, which may be applied against future taxable income. These carryforwards will expire at various times between 20052006 and 2023.2025. A substantial portion of these carryforwards isare restricted to future taxable income of certain of the Company's subsidiaries or limited by Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Thus, the utilization of these carryforwards cannot be assured. Net operating loss carryforwards include tax deductions for the disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options. When the Company utilizes the net operating loss related to these deductions, the tax benefit will be reflected in additional paid-in capital and not as a reduction of tax expense. The total amount of these deductions included in the net operating loss carryforwards is $21,177. F-20 $21,177,000.

The undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries are not subject to additional foreign income taxes nor considered to be subject to U.S. income taxes unless remitted as dividends. The Company intends to reinvest such undistributed earnings indefinitely; accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. taxes on those earnings. The determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to the undistributed earnings is not practicable.

F-19


The Company provided a full valuation allowance on the total amount of its deferred tax assets at December 31, 20032006 and 2005 since management does not believe that it is more likely than not that these assets will be realized. NOTE 10. SENIOR CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK On March 19, 2003,


NOTE 9.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock:

As part of the recapitalization plan described in Note 2, the Company converted outstanding convertible promissory notes, senior reorganization notes and convertible bridge notes. Senior reorganization debt amounting to $2,309,000 was cancelled and converted into 3,438,473 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company also converted $3,915,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes into 30,508,448 shares of Cicero common stock. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.

In January 2004, the Company completed a $3,500 private placementcommon stock financing round wherein it raised $1,247,000 of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series D Preferred Stock"), convertible at a conversion ratiocapital from several new investors as well as certain investors of $0.32 per shareCritical Mass Mail, Inc. The Company sold 3,369,192 shares of common stock into an aggregateat a price of 11,031,250 shares of common stock.$0.37 per share. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate3,369,192 shares of 4,158,780 shares ofthe Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share ("Series D-1 Warrants"). On October 10, 2003, the Company, consistent with its obligations, also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,665,720 shares of common stock at an exercise price the lesser of $0.20 per share or market price at the time of exercise ("Series D-2 Warrants"). The Series D-2 Warrants became exercisable on November 1, 2003, because the Company failed to report $6,000 in gross revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2003. Both existing and new investors participated in the financing. The Company also agreed to register the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock and exercise of the warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Under the terms of the financing agreement, a redemption event may occur if any one person, entity or group shall control more than 35% of the voting power of the Company's capital stock. The Company allocated the proceeds received from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock and warrants to the preferred stock and detachable warrants on a relative fair value basis, resulting in an allocation of $2,890 to the Series D Preferred Stock and $640 to the detachable warrants. Based upon the allocation of the proceeds, the Company determined that the effective conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock was less than the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. The beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a discount on the value of the Series D Preferred Stock and an increase in additional paid-in capital. Because Series D Preferred Stock was convertible immediately upon issuance, the Company fully amortized such beneficial conversion feature on the date of issuance. As part of the financing, the Company and the lead investors have agreed to form a joint venture to exploit the Cicero technology in the Asian market. The terms of the agreement require that the Company place $1,000 of the gross proceeds from the financing into escrow to fund the joint venture. The escrow agreement allows for the immediate release of funds to cover organizational costs of the joint venture. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, $225 of escrowed funds was released. Since the joint venture was not formed and operational on or by July 17, 2003, the lead investors have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium, less their pro-rata share of expenses. The Company and the lead investor have mutually agreed to extend the escrow release provisions until April 15, 2004. Another condition of the financing requires the Company to place an additional $1,000 of the gross proceeds into escrow, pending the execution of a definitive agreement with Merrill Lynch, providing for the sale of all right, title and interest to the Cicero technology. Since a transaction with Merrill Lynch for the sale of Cicero was not consummated by May 18, 2003, the lead investors have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium. During the second quarter, $390 of escrowed funds was released. In addition, the Company and the lead investor agreed to extend the escrow release provisions until the end of July 2003 when all remaining escrow monies were released to the Company. F-21 NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY COMMON STOCK: In October 2003, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with several investors wherein the Company agreed to sell 1,894,444 shares of its common stock and issue 473,611 warrants to purchase the Company's common stock at a price of $0.45 per share for a total of $853 in proceeds. This offering closed on October 15, 2003.$0.37. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. In January 2002, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with several investors wherein the Company agreed to sell up to 3,000,000 shares of its common stock

Stock Grants:

During 2006 and warrants. The common stock was valued at $1.50 per share and warrants to purchase additional shares were issued with an exercise price of $2.75 per share. This offering closed on January 16, 2002. Of the 3,000,000 shares, the Company sold 2,381,952 shares of common stock for a total of $3,574 and granted 476,396 warrants to purchase the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.75 per share. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant and have a call feature that forces exercise if the Company's common stock exceeds $5.50 per share. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. Under this Private Placement, the Company had agreed to certain terms and conditions that would trigger payments by the Company if the Company did not keep such shares registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In April 2003, in exchange for a waiver of such provisions the Company agreed to exchange the warrants from the January 2002 Private Placement priced at $2.50 for new warrants priced at $0.60 and has extended the expiration date until March 2007. Each participant is required to execute a waiver prior to receiving the repriced warrants. STOCK GRANTS: During 2002, the Company issued 109,672 shares of common stock to employees for retention bonuses and severance. The grants represented compensation for services previously performed and were valued and recorded based on the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, which totaled $92. During 2003,2005, no stock awards were made to employees. STOCK OPTIONS: employees.

Stock Options:

The Company maintains two stock option plans, the 1995 and 1997 Stock Incentive Plans, which permit the issuance of incentive and nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, and restricted and unrestricted stock to employees, officers, directors, consultants, and advisors. In July 2003, stockholders approved a proposal to increase the number of shares reserved within these plans to a combined total of 10,900,000109,000 shares of common stock for issuance upon the exercise of awards and provide that the term of each award be determined by the Board of Directors. In December 2005, the remaining options under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan expired. The Company also has a stock incentive plan for outside directors and the Company has set aside 120,0001,200 shares of common stock for issuance under this plan.

Under the terms of the Plans, the exercise price of the incentive stock options may not be less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of the award and the options are exercisable for a period not to exceed ten years from date of grant. Stock appreciation rights entitle the recipients to receive the excess of the fair market value of the Company's stock on the exercise date, as determined by the Board of Directors, over the fair market value on the date of grant. Performance shares entitle recipients to acquire Company stock upon the attainment of specific performance goals set by the Board of Directors. Restricted stock entitles recipients to acquire Company stock subject to the right of the Company to repurchase the shares in the event conditions specified by the Board are not satisfied prior to the end of the restriction period. The Board may also grant unrestricted stock to participants at a cost not less than 85% of fair market value on the date of sale. Options granted vest at varying periods up to five years and expire in ten years. F-22

F-20


Activity for stock options issued under these plans for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2003, 20022006, 2005 and 20012004 was as follows: OPTION PRICE WEIGHTED AVERAGE PLAN ACTIVITY PER SHARE EXERCISE PRICE ------------- --------- -------------- Balance at December 31, 2000.... 3,857,517 1.37-39.31 15.83 Granted...................... 3,037,581 1.74-6.13 3.60 Forfeited.................... (2,528,945) 1.37-39.31 16.38 --------------- Balance at December 31, 2001.... 4,366,153 1.37-39.31 6.92 Granted...................... 1,942,242 0.34-1.70 0.58 Forfeited.................... (2,474,016) 0.39-39.31 6.76 --------------- Balance at December 31, 2002 3,834,379 0.34-39.31 3.81 Granted.................... 2,566,126 0.22-0.57 0.24 Exercised.................. (121,434) 0.22-0.22 0.22 Forfeited................. (653,193) 0.22-39.31 2.60 --------------- Balance at December 31, 2003... 5,625,878 0.20-39.31 2.43 ===============

  
Plan Activity
 
Option Price Per Share
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
Balance at December 31, 2003  56,259  
20.00-3,931.00
  243.00 
           
Granted  31,392  12.00 -39.00  26.00 
Exercised  (5,192) 8.00 -37.00  17.00 
Forfeited  (7,572) 22.00-3,788.00  812.00 
Balance at December 31, 2004  74,887  12.00-3,931.00  111.00 
           
Granted  2,529  7.00 - 12.00  9.00 
Exercised  (2,529) 7.00 - 12.00  9.00 
Forfeited  (15,877) 22.00-3,931.00  75.00 
Balance at December 31, 2005  59,010  12.00-3,931.00  124.00 
Forfeited  (13,695) 22.00-3,931.00  137.14 
Balance at December 31, 2006  45,315  12.00-3,931.00  120.61 
There were no option grants issued during 2006. The weighted average grant date fair value of options issued during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002,2005, and 20012004 was equal to $0.24, $0.58,$9.00 and $2.59$26.00 per share, respectively. There were no option grants issued below fair market value during 2003, 2002 or 2001. 2005 and 2004.

At December 31, 2003, 20022006, 2005, and 2001,2004, options to purchase approximately 2,770,126, 1,409,461,45,315, 5,237, and 1,313,8264,775 shares of common stock were exercisable, respectively, pursuant to the plans at prices ranging from $0.22$12.00 to $39.32.$3,931.25. The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003:
REMAINING CONTRACTUAL WEIGHTED LIFE FOR OPTIONS AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE NUMBER OUTSTANDING NUMBER EXERCISE OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE PRICE - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $0.22-3.93 4,514,878 8.8 1,870,153 $ 0.62 3.94-7.86 846,650 5.4 635,623 6.27 7.87-11.79 93,650 4.3 93,650 8.92 11.80-15.72 40,000 0.5 40,000 12.29 15.73-19.66 7,500 6.6 7,500 18.81 19.67-23.59 3,000 6.5 3,000 20.00 23.60-27.52 0 0.0 0 0.00 27.53-31.45 3,000 6.0 3,000 30.25 31.46-35.38 0 0.0 0 0.00 35.39-39.32 117,200 1.0 117,200 38.03 --------------------- --------------------- 5,625,878 8.0 2,770,126 $ 4.05 ===================== =====================
PREFERRED STOCK: In connection with the sale of Series D 2006:
EXERCISE PRICE
 
NUMBER OUTSTANDING/ EXERCISABLE
 
REMAINING CONTRACTUAL LIFE FOR OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE
 
        
$    12.00 - 393.12  39,680  6.4 $48.03 
 393.13 -786.25
  5,350  4.1  586.35 
   786.26-1,179.37  165  3.0  944.41 
1,179.38-1,572.50  50  1.0  1,473.00 
1,572.60-1,965.62  40  3.6  1,881.25 
1,965.62-3,538.12  0  0.0  0.00 
3,538.13-3,931.25  30  3.2  3,931.25 
           
   45,315  6.1 $120.61 


Preferred Stock the holders of the Company's Series A3 Preferred Stock and Series B3 Preferred Stock (collectively, the "Existing Preferred Stockholders"), entered into an agreement whereby the Existing Preferred Stockholders have agreed to waive certain applicable price protection anti-dilution provisions. Under the terms of the waiver agreement, the Company is also permitted to issue equity securities representing aggregate proceeds of up to an additional $4,900 following the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock. Additionally, the Existing Preferred Stockholders have also agreed to a limited lock-up restricting their ability to sell common stock issuable upon conversion of their preferred stock and warrants and to waive the accrual of any dividends that may otherwise be payable as a result of the Company's delisting from Nasdaq. As consideration for the waiver agreement, the Company has agreed to issue on a pro rata basis up to 1,000 warrants to all the Existing Preferred Stockholders on a pro rata basis at such time and from time to time as the Company closes financing transactions that represent proceeds in excess of $2,900, excluding the proceeds from the Series D Preferred Stock transaction. Such warrants will have an exercise price that is the greater of $0.40 or the same exercise price as the exercise price of the warrant, or equity security, that the Company issues in connection with the Company's financing or loan transaction that exceeds the $2,900 threshold. F-23 On August 14, 2002, the Company completed a $1,600 private placement of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred Stock"), convertible at a conversion ratio of $0.38 per share of common stock into an aggregate of 4,184,211 shares of common stock. :

As part of the financing,recapitalization plan approved by shareholders in November 2006, the Company has also issued warrantsoffered to purchase an aggregate of 1,046,053exchange its existing Series A-3, B-3, C and D preferred shares at reduced conversion rates in exchange for shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.38 per share. As consideration for the $1,600 private placement, the Company received approximately $1,400 in cash and allowed certain debt holders to convert approximately $150 of debt and $50 accounts payable to equity. The Chairman and CEO of the Company, Anthony Pizi, converted $150 of debt owed to him into shares ofa new Series C Preferred Stock and warrants. Both existing and new investors participated in the financing. The Company also agreed to register the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock and exercise of the warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company allocated the proceeds received from the sale of the Series C Preferred Stock and warrants to theA-1 preferred stock and the detachable warrants onin Cicero Inc. This proposal also required approved by existing preferred shareholders as a relative fair value basis, resulting in the allocation $1,271class. The new conversion prices with respect to the Series C Preferred StockA-3, B-3 and $329D preferred stock were negotiated with the holders of each series based upon such factors as the current conversion price in relation to the detachable warrants. Based onmarket, the allocation of the proceeds, the Company determined that the effective conversion price of the Series C Preferred Stock was less than the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. As a result, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature in thedollar amount of $329 based on the difference between the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the closing date of the transactionrepresented by such series and, the effective conversion price of the Series C Preferred Stock. The beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a discount on the value of the Series C Preferred Stock and an increase in additional paid-in capital. Because the Series C Preferred Stock was convertible immediately upon issuance, the Company fully amortized such beneficial conversion feature on the date of issuance. In connection with the sale of Series C Preferred Stock, the Company agreed with the existing holders of its Series A1 Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series A1 Preferred Stock") and the Series B1 Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series B1 Preferred Stock"), in exchange for their waiver of certain anti-dilution, provisions, to reprice an aggregate of 1,801,022 warrants to purchase common stock from an exercise price of $1.77 to $0.38. The Company entered into an Exchange Agreement with such holders providing for the issuance of 11,570 shares of Series A2 Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A2 Preferred Stock")liquidation preferences, seniority and 30,000 Series B2 Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series B2 Preferred Stock"), respectively. Series A2 Preferred Stock and Series B2 Preferred Stock are convertible into an aggregate of 1,388,456 and 2,394,063 shares of the Company's common stock at $8.33 and $12.53 per share, respectively. The exchange is being undertaken in consideration of the temporary release of the anti-dilution provisions of the Series A1 Preferred Stockholders and Series B1 Preferred Stockholders. Based on a valuation performed by an independent valuation firm, the Company recorded a deemed dividend of $293, to reflect the increase in the fair value of the preferred stock and warrants as a result of the exchange. (See "Stock Warrants" for fair value assumptions.) The dividend increased the fair value of the warrant liability. As of December 31, 2003, no warrants had been exercised. F-24 On October 25, 2002, the Company effected an exchange of all of our outstanding shares of Series A2 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A2 Preferred Stock") and Series B2 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B2 Preferred Stock") and related warrants for an equal number of shares of newly created Series A3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A3 Preferred Stock") and Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B3 Preferred Stock") and related warrants. This exchange was made to correct a deficiency in the conversion price from the prior exchange of Series A1 and B1 Preferred Stock and related warrants for Series A2 and B2 Preferred Stock and related warrants on August 29, 2002.other senior rights. The conversion price for the Series A3 Preferred Stock andC preferred stock was determined in relation to the conversion price for the Series B3 Preferred Stock remainD preferred stock. The Board of Directors

F-21


determined the same as the previously issued Series A1 and A2 Preferred Stock and Series B1 and B2 Preferred Stock, at $8.33 and $12.53, respectively. The exercise price for the aggregate 753,640 warrants relating to the Series A3 Preferred Stock ("Series A3 Warrants") was increased from $0.38 to $0.40 per share which is a reduction from the $1.77 exercisenew conversion price of each series of Level 8 preferred stock after discussion and review of those rights, ranks and privileges that were being waived by the warrants relating to the Series A1 Preferred Stock. The exercise price for the aggregate 1,047,382 warrants relating to the Series B3 Preferred Stock ("Series B3 Warrants") was increased from $0.38 to $0.40 per share which is a reduction from the $1.77 exercise price of the warrants relating to the Series B1 Preferred Stock. The adjusted exercise price was based on the closing price of the Company's Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock and warrants on August 14, 2002, plus $0.02, to reflect accurate current market value according to relevant Nasdaq rules. This adjustment was made as part of the agreement under which thepresent holders of the Company's Preferred Stock agreed to waive their price-protectionpreferred stock. Among those rights being waived are anti-dilution protections to allow the Company to issue the Series C Preferred Stockprotection, liquidation preferences and warrants without triggering the price-protection anti-dilution provisions and excessively diluting its common stock. The Company may cause the redemption of the Series A3 Preferred Stock warrants and the Series B3 Preferred Stock warrants for $.0001 at any time if the closing price of the Company's common stock over 20 consecutive trading days is greater than $5.00 and $7.50 per share, respectively. seniority.

The holders of the Series A3A-1 preferred stock shall have the rights and preferences set forth in the Certificate of Designations filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware upon the approval of the Recapitalization. The rights and interests of the Series B3 Warrants may causeA-1 preferred stock of the warrantsCompany will be substantially similar to the rights interests of each of the series of Level 8 preferred stock other than for (i) anti-dilution protections that have been permanently waived and (ii) certain voting, redemption and other rights that holders of Series A-1 preferred stock will not be entitled to. All shares of Series A-1 preferred stock will have a liquidation preference pari passu with all other Series A-1 preferred stock.

The Series A-1 preferred stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into an initial conversion ratio of 1,000 shares of Common Stock for each share of Series A-1 preferred stock. The initial conversion ratio shall be adjusted in the event of any stock splits, stock dividends and other recapitalizations. The Series A-1 preferred stock is also convertible on a automatic basis in the event that (i) the Company closes on an additional $5,000,000 equity financing from strategic or institutional investors, or (ii) the Company has four consecutive quarters of positive cash flow as reflected on the Company’s financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals (“GAAP”) and filed with the Commission. The holders of Series A-1 preferred stock are entitled to receive equivalent dividends on an as-converted basis whenever the Company declares a dividend on its Common Stock, other than dividends payable in shares of Common Stock. The holders of the Series A-1 preferred stock are entitled to a liquidation preference of $500 per share of Series A-1 preferred stock upon the liquidation of the Company. The Series A-1 preferred stock is not redeemable.

The holders of Series A-1 preferred stock also possess the following voting rights. Each share of Series A-1 preferred stock shall represent that number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of a share of Series A-1 preferred stock. The holders of Series A-1 preferred stock and the holders of Common Stock shall vote together as a class on all matters except: (i) regarding the election of the Board of Directors of the Company (as set forth below); (ii) as required by law; or (iii) regarding certain corporate actions to be redeemedtaken by the Company (as set forth below).

The approval of at least two-thirds of the holders of Series A-1 preferred stock voting together as a class, shall be required in order for cashthe Company to: (i) merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or to recapitalize or reorganize; (ii) authorize the issuance of any equity security having any right, preference or priority superior to or on parity with the Series A-1 preferred stock; (iii) redeem, repurchase or acquire indirectly or directly any of its equity securities, or to pay any dividends on the Company’s equity securities; (iv) amend or repeal any provisions of its certificate of incorporation or bylaws that would adversely affect the rights, preferences or privileges of the Series A-1 preferred stock; (v) effectuate a significant change in the principal business of the Company as conducted at the difference betweeneffective time of the exercise price and the fair market value immediately preceding a redemption event as definedRecapitalization; (vi) make any loan or advance to any entity other than in the contract.ordinary course of business unless such entity is wholly owned by the Company; (vii) make any loan or advance to any person, including any employees or directors of the Company or any subsidiary, except in the ordinary course of business or pursuant to an approved employee stock or option plan; and (viii) guarantee, directly or indirectly any indebtedness or obligations, except for trade accounts of any subsidiary arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the unanimous vote of the board of directors is required for any liquidation, dissolution, recapitalization or reorganization of the Company. The voting rights of the holders of Series A-1 preferred stock set forth in this paragraph shall be terminated immediately upon the closing by the Company of at least an additional $5,000,000 equity financing from strategic or institutional investors.

In addition to the voting rights described above, the holders of a majority of the shares of Series A-1 preferred stock are entitled to appoint two observers to the Company’s Board of Directors who shall be entitled to receive all information received by members of the Board of Directors, and shall attend and participate without a vote at all meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors and any committees thereof. At the option of a majority of the holders of Series A-1 preferred stock, such holders may elect to temporarily or permanently exchange their board observer rights for two seats on the Company’s Board of Directors, each having all voting and other rights attendant to any member of the Company’s Board of Directors. As such,part of the Recapitalization, the right of the holders of Series A-1 preferred stock to elect a majority of the voting members of the Company’s Board of Directors shall be terminated.

F-22


As a result of the reduced conversion prices the Company exchanged all of the Series A-3, B-3, C and D preferred stock into 172 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock and using Black-Scholes, we calculated a beneficial conversion in the exchange of the Series A-3, B-3, C and D shares for Series A-1 preferred stock. The beneficial conversion of $21,000 is treated as a deemed dividend in the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.

As part of the recapitalization plan, Noteholders of $992,000 of Convertible Promissory Notes were offered reduced conversion prices to convert their notes into shares of the Company’s new series A-1 preferred stock. All Noteholders have agreed to convert their notes into shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. The Company has cancelled these notes and issued 1,591 shares of its Series A-1 preferred stock. In accordance with EITF 98-5 and specifically paragraph 8, the Company has utilized the Black-Scholes formula to determine the fair value of the warrants at issuancestock received. The Company has been classified as a warrant liability in accordance with EITF 00-19, "Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in a Company's Own Stock". As of December 31, 2003, no warrants have been exercised andcalculated the fair value of the liability is $198. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is authorizedstock received to issue equity securitiesbe $484,000 resulting in a single or seriesbeneficial conversion of financing transactions representing aggregate gross proceeds to$508,000. Since this beneficial conversion is immediately recognizable by the Company of approximately $5,000, or up to an aggregate 17,500 shares of common stock, without triggering the price-protection anti-dilution provisions in the Series A3 Preferred Stock and B3 Preferred Stock and related warrants. In exchange for the waiver of these price-protection anti-dilution provisions, the Company repriced the warrants as described above and have agreed to issue on a pro rata basis up to 4,600 warrants to the holders, of Series A3 Preferred Stock and Series B3 Preferred Stock at such time and from time to time as the Company closes subsequent financing transactions up to the $5,000 issuance cap or the 17,500 share issuance cap. As a result of the Series C Preferred Stock financing, which represented approximately $1,600 of the Company's $5,000 in allowable equity issuances, the Company is obligated to issue an aggregate of 1,462,801 warrants at an exercise price of $0.40 per share to the existing preferred stockholders. The warrants were issued on December 31, 2002 and had a fair value of $373, which was recorded as a dividend to, Preferred stockholders. As a result of the Series D preferred Stock financing which represented approximately $3,500 against the allowable equity issuances, the Company was obligated to issue an aggregate of 3,048,782 warrants at an exercise price of $0.40 per share to the existing Series A3 and Series B3 preferred shareholders. The warrants were issued on October 8, 2003 and had a fair value of $1,062, which was recorded as a deemed dividend to preferred stockholders. Additionally, the Company has agreedfully amortized this conversion and recorded an accretion to issue a warrant to purchase commonpreferred stock toin the existing preferred stockholders on a pro rata basisStatement of Operations for each warrant to purchase common stock that the Company issues to a third-party lender in connection with the closing of a qualified loan transaction. The above referenced warrants will have the same exercise price as the exercise price of the warrant, or equity security, that the Company issues in connection with the Company's subsequent financing or loan transaction or $0.40, whichever is greater. These warrants are not classified as a liability under EITF 00-19. year ended December 31, 2006.

During 20032005 and 20022004, there were 6,250456 shares of preferred stock converted into 1,377,9211,351,112 shares of the Company's common stock and 1,5004,686 shares of preferred stock converted into 180,0077,037,451 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock, respectively. There were 4,0701,571 shares of the Series A3 Preferred Stock and 30,000 shares of Series B3 Preferred Stock, 1,340991 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, and 3,3551,061 shares of Series D Preferred Stock outstanding at December 31, 2003. F-25 STOCK WARRANTS: 2005.

Stock Warrants:

The Company values warrants based on the Black-Scholes pricing model. Warrants granted in 2003, 2002,2006, 2005, and 2001were2004 were valued using the following assumptions:
EXPECTED EXPECTED RISK FREE EXPECTED FAIR VALUE OF LIFE IN YEARS VOLATILITY INTEREST RATE DIVIDEND COMMON STOCK ------------- ---------- ------------- -------- ------------ December 2000 Commercial Lender Warrants 4 87% 5% None $6.19 Preferred Series A3 and B3 Warrants 4 107.5% 4% None $1.89 2002-2003 Financing Warrants 5 97% 2% None $0.40 Preferred Series C Warrants 5 117% 3% None $0.38 Preferred Series D-1 Warrants 5 117% 3% None $0.07 Preferred Series D-2 Warrants 5 102% 3% None $0.20 Private Placement 3 102% 3% None $0.45
During December 2000, the Company issued a commercial lender rights to purchase up to 172,751 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $4.34

  
Expected Life in Years
 
Expected Volatility
 
Risk Free Interest Rate
 
Expected Dividend
 
Fair Value of Common Stock
 
            
2002-2003 Financing Warrants  5  97% 2% None $0.40 
Preferred Series C Warrants  5  117% 3% None $0.38 
Preferred Series D-1 Warrants  5  117% 3% None $0.07 
Preferred Series D-2 Warrants  5  102% 3% None $0.20 
Private Placement - January 2004  3  101% 3% None $0.36 
Early Adopter Warrants  4  104% 4% None $1.50 

Increase in connection with a new credit facility. The warrants were valued at $775 or $4.49 per share and are exercisable until December 28, 2004. As of December 31, 2003, no warrants have been exercised. INCREASE IN CAPITAL STOCK: Capital Stock:

In July 2003,November 2006, the stockholders approved a proposal to amend the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that the Company is authorized to issue from 60,000,00085,000,000 to 85,000,000. NOTE 12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS As of January 1, 2001, the215,000,000.


NOTE 10.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company sponsoredsponsors one defined contribution plan for its U.S. employees - the Level 8 Systems 401(k). On December 31, 2000,Under the terms of the Plan, the Company amended the Level 8 Systems 401(k) plan to provideprovides a 50% matching contribution up to 6% of an employee'semployee’s salary. Participants must be eligible Level 8Company plan participants and employed at December 31 of each calendar year to be eligible for employer matching contributions. Matching contributions to the Plan included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations totaled $14, $7,$0, $30,000 and $7$54,000, for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002,2006, 2005, and 2001,2004, respectively. On December 1, 2005 the company suspended further contributions to the defined contribution plan.

F-23


The Company also had employee benefit plans for each of its foreign subsidiaries, as mandated by each country's laws and regulations. There was $0, $12, and $260 in expense recognized under these plans for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The Company no longer maintains foreign subsidiaries. NOTE 13. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK


NOTE 11.
SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

In 2003, three2006, four customers accounted for 42.1%50.0%, 19.5%18.7%, 13.3% and 12.7%10.0% of operating revenue. In 2005, two customers accounted for 52.4% and 13.0% of operating revenues. In 2002, two2004, five customers accounted for 38.7%24.6%, 22.4%, 13.5%, 11.8% and 26.7%11.4% of operating revenues. NOTE 14. FOREIGN CURRENCIES As of December 31, 2003, the Company had $0 and $8 of U.S. dollar equivalent cash and trade receivable balances, respectively, denominated in foreign currencies. F-26 As of December 31, 2002, the Company had $73 and $87 of U.S. dollar equivalent cash and trade receivable balances, respectively, denominated in foreign currencies.


NOTE 12.
FOREIGN CURRENCIES

The Company'sCompany’s net foreign currency transaction losseslosses/ (gains) were $31, $171,$14,000, $(23,000), and $198$13,000 for the years ended 2003, 20022006, 2005, and 2001,2004, respectively.


NOTE 13.
SEGMENT INFORMATION AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

The more significant trade accounts receivable denominated in foreign currencies as a percentage of total trade accounts receivable were as follows: 2003 2002 ---- ---- Euro .................................... 41.2% 4.0% Pound Sterling .......................... -- 2.1% NOTE 15. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION During the first quarter of 2001, management reassessed how the Company would be managed and how resources would be allocated. Management now makes operating decisions and assesses performance of the Company'sCompany’s operations based on the following reportable segments: (1) Desktop Integration segment, and (2) Messaging and Application Engineering segment. The Company previously had three reportable segments but the Company has reported the Systems Integration segment as discontinued operations.

The principal product in the Desktop Integration segment is Cicero. CiceroCicero®. Cicero® is a business integration software product that maximizes end-user productivity, streamlines business operations and integrates disparate systems and applications.

The products that comprise the Messaging and Application Engineering segment are Ensuredmail, Geneva Integration Broker, Geneva Message Queuing, Geneva XIPC, Geneva AppBuilder, CTRC and Star/SQL. During 2001, the Company sold three of its messaging products, Geneva Message Queuing, Geneva XIPC and AppBuilder. During 2002, the Company sold its CTRC and Star/SQL products.

Segment data includes a charge allocating all corporate headquarters costs to each of its operating segments based on each segment's proportionate share of expenses. During 2002, the Company reported the operations of its Systems Integration segment as discontinued operations and has reallocated the corporate overhead for the Systems Integration segment in 2002 and 2001. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on earnings (loss) before interest and other income/(expense), taxes, in-process research and development, and restructuring. F-27 The table below presents information about reported segments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002: MESSAGING/ DESKTOP APPLICATION INTEGRATION ENGINEERING TOTAL ----------- ----------- ----- 2003: Total revenue .................. $ 466 $ 64 $ 530 Total cost of revenue .......... 5,371 62 5,433 Gross margin (loss) ............ (4,905) 2 (4,903) Total operating expenses ....... 4,999 256 5,255 Segment profitability (loss) ... $ (9,904) $ (254) $(10,158) 2002: Total revenue .................. $ 2,148 $ 953 $ 3,101 Total cost of revenue .......... 6,527 1,950 8,477 Gross margin (loss) ............ (4,379) (997) (5,376) Total operating expenses ....... 8,211 434 8,645 Segment profitability (loss) ... $(12,590) $ (1,431) $(14,021) 2001: Total revenue .................. $ 134 $ 17,223 $ 17,357 Total cost of revenue .......... 9,427 14,109 23,536 Gross margin (loss) ............ (9,293) 3,114 (6,179) Total operating expenses ....... 18,858 7,179 26,037 Segment profitability (loss) ... $(28,151) $ (4,065) $(32,216) A reconciliation of segment operating expenses to total operating expense follows: 2003 2002 2001 -------- -------- -------- Segment operating expenses ...... $ 5,255 $ 8,645 $ 26,037 Amortization of intangible assets -- -- 6,259 Write-off of intangible assets .. -- -- 7,929 (Gain)Loss on disposal of assets 415 461 (6,345) Restructuring, net .............. (834) 1,300 8,650 -------- -------- -------- Total operating expenses ........ $ 4,836 $ 10,406 $ 42,530 ======== ======== ======== A reconciliation of total segment profitability to net loss for the fiscal years ended December 31:
2003 2002 2001 -------- -------- -------- Total segment profitability (loss) ....... $(10,158) $(14,021) $(32,216) Amortization of intangible assets ........ -- -- (6,259) Impairment of intangible assets .......... -- -- (7,929) Gain/(loss) on disposal of assets ........ (415) (461) 6,345 Restructuring ............................ 834 (1,300) (8,650) Interest and other income/(expense), net . (135) 2,485 (8,850) -------- -------- -------- Net loss before provision for income taxes $ (9,874) $(13,297) $(57,559) ======== ======== ========
F-28 The following table presents a summary of long-lived assets by segment as of December 31: 2003 2002 ------ ------ Desktop Integration .......................... $4,089 $8,096 Messaging/Application Engineering ............ -- 62 ------ ------ Total assets ................................. $4,089 $8,158 ====== ====== The following table presents a summary of revenue by geographic region for the years ended December 31: 2003 2002 2001 ------- ------- ------- Australia ................ $ -- $ -- $ 141 Denmark .................. 32 20 2,333 France ................... -- 7 30 Germany .................. -- 35 757 Israel ................... -- 4 659 Italy .................... 18 32 813 Norway ................... -- 1 491 Switzerland .............. -- -- 667 United Kingdom ........... -- 13 1,929 USA ...................... 476 2,989 6,402 Other .................... 4 -- 3,135 ------- ------- ------- $ 530 $ 3,101 $17,357 ======= ======= ======= Presentation of revenue by region is based on the country in which the customer is domiciled. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, all of the long-lived assets of the Company are located in the United States. The Company reimburses the Company's foreign subsidiaries for their costs plus an appropriate mark-up for profit. Intercompany profits and losses are eliminated in consolidation. NOTE 16. RELATED PARTY INFORMATION Liraz Systems Ltd. guarantees certain debt obligations of the Company. In November 2003, the Company and Liraz agreed to extend the guarantee and with the approval of the lender, agreed to extend the maturity of the debt obligation until November 8, 2004. The Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock to Liraz in exchange for this debt extension and will issue additional stock on March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004 unless the debt is repaid before those dates. (See Note 8.) From time to time during 2003, the Company entered into short term notes payable with Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Notes bear interest at 1% per month and are unsecured. At December 31, 2003, the Company was indebted to Mr. Pizi in the amount of $85. In January 2004, the Company repaid Mr. Pizi $75. On December 26, 2003, the Company entered into a short term note payable with Mark Landis who is related by marriage to Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The note, in the amount of $125, bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.32 per share. In October 2001, the Company sold its AppBuilder assets to BluePhoenix (a wholly owned subsidiary of Liraz) for $19,000 cash, a note receivable of $1,000 and of payment for net assets of $350. See Note 2. Liraz paid the salaries and expenses of certain company employees and was reimbursed by the Company. Salaries and expenses paid by Liraz amounted to $67 during 2001. F-29 NOTE 17. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES As part of the Company's plan to focus on the emerging desktop integration marketplace with its new Cicero product, the Company completed substantial restructurings in 2002 and 2001. At December 31, 2002, the Company's accrual for restructuring was $772, which was primarily comprised of excess facility costs. As more fully discussed in Note 20 Contingencies, subsequent to September 30, 2003, the Company settled litigation relating to these excess facilities. Accordingly, the Company has reversed the restructuring balance, as of September 30, 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign the note receivable from the sale of Geneva to EM Software Solutions, Inc., (see Note 2 Dispositions), with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the note receivable should the note obligor, EM Software Solutions, Inc., default on future payments. The current unpaid principal portion of the note receivable assigned is approximately $545 and matures December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a probability weighted cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company announced an additional round of restructurings to further reduce its operating costs and streamline its operations. The Company recorded a restructuring charge in the amount of $1,300, which encompassed the cost associated with the closure of the Company's Berkeley, California facility as well as a significant reduction in the Company's European personnel. During the first quarter of 2001, the Company announced and began implementation of an initial operational restructuring. The Company recorded restructuring charges of $6,650 during the quarter ended March 31, 2001 and an additional charge of $2,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. Restructuring charges have been classified in "Restructuring" on the consolidated statements of operations. These operational restructuring involved the reduction of employee staff throughout the Company in all geographical regions in sales, marketing, services, development and all administrative functions. The overall restructuring plan included the termination of 236 employees. The plan included a reduction of 107 personnel in the European operations and 129 personnel in the US operations. Employee termination costs were comprised of severance-related payments for all employees terminated in connection with the operational restructuring. Termination benefits did not include any amounts for employment-related services prior to termination. NOTE 18. FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT In July 2001, the Company and a significant customer entered into a multi-year agreement to fund the development of the next generation of Level 8's Geneva Enterprise Integrator and Geneva Business Process Automator software. The terms of the agreement provided $6,500 in funding for research and development for 18 months in exchange for a future fully paid and discounted licensing arrangement. In May 2002, the Company and Amdocs Ltd. agreed to terminate the funded development agreement and enter into a non-exclusive license to develop and sell its Geneva J2EE technology. Under the terms of the agreement to terminate the funded research and development program, Amdocs Ltd. assumed full responsibility for the development team of professionals located in the Company's Dulles, Virginia facility. The Geneva products comprised the Systems Integration segment and were subsequently identified as being held for sale. Accordingly, the Company reclassified the Systems Integration segment to discontinued operations. The business was eventually sold to EM Software Solutions, Inc, in December 2002. NOTE 19. LEASE COMMITMENTS The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under various operating leases. Future minimum lease commitments on operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2003 were as follows: Lease Commitments ----------- 2004 ................................................ $214 2005 ................................................ 221 2006 ................................................ 84 ---- $519 ==== F-30 Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $586, $2,980 and $1,835, respectively. Sublease income was $241, $2,487 and $221 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had no sublease arrangements. NOTE 20. CONTINGENCIES Various lawsuits and claims have been brought against the Company in the normal course of business. In January 2003, an action was brought against the Company in the Circuit Court of Loudon County Virginia for a breach of a real estate lease. The case was settled in August 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign a note receivable with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the note should the note obligor default on future payments. The unpaid balance of the note being transferred was $545 and matures in December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a weighted probability cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131. In October 2003, the Company was served with a summons and complaint regarding unpaid invoices for services rendered to the Company by one of its vendors. The amount in dispute is approximately $200 and is included in accounts payable. Subsequent to 2003, the Company has been served with an additional summons and complaint regarding a security deposit for a sublease in Virginia. The amount in dispute is approximately $247. The Company disagrees with this allegation although it has reserved for this contingency. Under the indemnification clause of the Company's standard reseller agreements and software license agreements, the Company agrees to defend the reseller/licensee against third party claims asserting infringement by the Company's products of certain intellectual property rights, which may include patents, copyrights, trademarks or trade secrets, and to pay any judgments entered on such claims against the reseller/licensee. F-31 NOTE 21. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ------- ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 2003: Net revenues ............................................... $ 143 $ 177 $ 113 $ 97 Gross profit/(loss) ........................................ (1,037) (968) (1,734) (1,164) Net loss from continuing operations ........................ (2,974) (2,424) (2,468) (2,008) Net loss discontinued operations ........................ (46) (20) (58) (8) Net loss ................................................... (3,020) (2,444) (2,526) (2,016) Net loss/share continued operations - basic and diluted . $ (0.19) $ (0.12) $ (0.12) $ (0.11) Net loss/share discontinued operations -- basic and diluted -- -- -- -- Net loss/share -basic and diluted ....................... $ (0.19) $ (0.12) $ (0.12) $ (0.11) 2002: Net revenues ............................................... $ 446 $ 630 $ 823 $ 1,202 Gross profit/(loss) ........................................ (3,548) (1,749) (422) 343 Net loss from continuing operations ........................ (5,409) (5,062) (1,948) (723) Net loss discontinued operations ........................ (676) (5,481) 484 633 Net loss ................................................... (6,085) (10,543) (1,464) (90) Net loss/share continued operations - basic and diluted . $ (0.29) $ (0.26) $ (0.12) $ (0.07) Net loss/share discontinued operations -- basic and diluted $ (0.04) $ (0.29) $ 0.03 $ 0.03 Net loss/share -basic and diluted ....................... $ (0.33) $ (0.55) $ (0.09) $ (0.04)
NOTE 22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In January 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail, a federally certified encryption software company. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company issued 2,027,027 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37. The total purchase price of the assets and certain liabilities being acquired was $750 and has been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. The Company agreed to register the common stock for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Also in January 2004, and simultaneously with the asset purchase of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., the Company completed a common stock financing round wherein it raised $1,247 of capital from several new investors as well as certain investors of Critical Mass Mail, Inc. The Company sold 3,369,192 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase 3,369,192 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.37. The warrants expire three years from the date of grant. The Company also agreed to register the common stock and the warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. F-32 LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED)
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, 2004 2003 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents .............................................. $ 122 $ 19 Cash held in escrow .................................................... 777 776 Assets of operations to be abandoned ................................... 137 149 Trade accounts receivable, net ......................................... 13 12 Prepaid expenses and other current assets .............................. 146 270 --------- --------- Total current assets ....................................... 1,195 1,226 Property and equipment, net ............................................. 23 26 Software product technology, net ........................................ 3,622 4,063 Other assets ............................................................ 47 47 --------- --------- Total assets ............................................... $ 4,887 $ 5,362 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) Current liabilities: Short-term debt ......................................................... $ 2,456 $ 2,625 Accounts payable ........................................................ 2,487 2,545 Accrued expenses: Salaries, wages, and related items ................................... 668 508 Other ................................................................ 1,616 1,613 Liabilities of operations to be abandoned ............................... 442 451 Deferred revenue ........................................................ 180 39 --------- --------- Total current liabilities .................................. 7,849 7,781 Long-term debt .......................................................... 131 131 Warrant liability ....................................................... 179 198 Senior convertible redeemable preferred stock ........................... 2,692 3,355 Stockholders' equity (deficit): Preferred Stock ................................................. -- -- Common Stock ....................................................... 35 27 Additional paid-in-capital ......................................... 208,915 206,149 Accumulated other comprehensive loss ............................... (5) (6) Accumulated deficit ................................................ (214,909) (212,273) --------- --------- Total stockholders' equity (deficit) ....................... (5,964) (6,103) --------- --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) ....... $ 4,887 $ 5,362 ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-33 LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS) (UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 2003 -------- -------- Revenue: Software ............................................................ $ 10 $ 36 Maintenance ......................................................... 73 83 Services ............................................................ -- 24 -------- -------- Total operating revenue ....................................... 83 143 Cost of revenue: Software ............................................................ 719 837 Maintenance ......................................................... 104 92 Services ............................................................ 280 251 -------- -------- Total cost of revenue ......................................... 1,103 1,180 Gross margin (loss) ................................................... (1,020) (1,037) Operating expenses: Sales and marketing ................................................. 335 551 Research and product development .................................... 312 253 General and administrative .......................................... 471 784 Loss on disposal of assets .......................................... -- 487 Impairment of intangible assets ..................................... 587 -- -------- -------- Total operating expenses ...................................... 1,705 2,075 -------- -------- Loss from operations .................................................. (2,725) (3,112) Other income (expense): Interest income ..................................................... 1 18 Interest expense .................................................... (39) (47) Change in fair value of warrant liability ........................... 19 148 Other income ........................................................ 117 19 -------- -------- Loss before provision for income taxes ................................ (2,627) (2,974) Income tax provision ................................................ -- -- -------- -------- Loss from continuing operations ....................................... (2,627) (2,974) Loss from discontinued operations ..................................... (9) (46) -------- -------- Net loss .............................................................. $ (2,636) $ (3,020) ======== ======== Loss per share from continuing operations--basic and diluted .......... (0.09) (0.19) Loss per share from discontinued operations-basic and diluted ......... (0.00) (0.00) -------- -------- Net loss per share applicable to common shareholders--basic and diluted $ (0.09) $ (0.19) ======== ======== Weighted average common shares outstanding -- basic and diluted ...... 30,727 19,233
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-34 LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 2003 ------- ------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss ........................................................................... $(2,636) $(3,020) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization .................................................... 657 815 Change in fair value of warrant liability ........................................ (19) (148) Stock compensation expense ....................................................... 61 10 Impairment of intangible assets .................................................. 587 -- Provision for doubtful accounts .................................................. (8) 39 Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed: Trade accounts receivable and related party receivables ........................ 7 1,249 Assets & liabilities - discontinued operations ................................. 3 606 Prepaid expenses and other assets .............................................. 186 (13) Accounts payable and accrued expenses .......................................... 45 (968) Deferred revenue ............................................................... 141 (85) ------- ------- Net cash used in operating activities ........................................ (976) (1,515) Cash flows from investing activities: Repayment of note receivable ....................................................... -- 764 Cash held in escrow ................................................................ -- (1,775) ------- ------- Net cash used in - investing activities ...................................... -- (1,011) Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs ..................... 1,247 -- Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares ......................................... -- 3,455 Borrowings under credit facility, term loans and notes payable ..................... 100 -- Repayments of term loans, credit facility and notes payable ........................ (269) (396) ------- ------- Net cash provided by financing activities .................................... 1,078 3,059 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash .............................................. 1 (70) Net increase in cash and cash equivalents ............................................ 103 463 Cash and cash equivalents: Beginning of period ................................................................ 19 199 ------- ------- End of period ...................................................................... $ 122 $ 662 ======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-35 LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED) THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 2003 ------- ------- Net loss ................................. $(2,636) $(3,020) Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Foreign currency translation adjustment 1 (70) ------- ------- Comprehensive loss ....................... $(2,635) $(3,090) ------- ------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-36 LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (unaudited) NOTE 1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The accompanying financial statements are unaudited, and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. Accordingly, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Level 8 Systems, Inc.'s (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for other interim periods or for the full fiscal year. In the opinion of management, the information contained herein reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the interim results of operations. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, but does not include all disclosures required for financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All of the Company's subsidiaries are wholly owned for the periods presented. LIQUIDITY The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred a loss of $10,006 and $18,182 in the past two years and has experienced negative cash flows from operations for each of the past three years. For the quarter ended March 31, 2004, the Company incurred a loss of $2,636 and had a working capital deficiency of $6,654. The Company's future revenues are largely dependent on acceptance of a newly developed and marketed product, Cicero, which has had limited success in commercial markets to date. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt that the Company can continue as a going concern. In order to address these issues and to obtain adequate financing for the Company's operations for the next twelve months, the Company is actively promoting and expanding its Cicero related product line and continues to negotiate with significant customers that have begun or finalized the "proof of concept" stage with the Cicero technology. The Company is experiencing difficulty increasing sales revenue largely because of the inimitable nature of the product as well as customer concerns about the financial viability of the Company. The Company is attempting to solve the former problem by improving the market's knowledge and understanding of Cicero through increased marketing and leveraging its limited number of reference accounts. The Company is attempting to address the financial concerns of potential customers by pursuing strategic partnerships with companies that have significant financial resources although the Company has not experienced significant success to date with this approach. Additionally, the Company is seeking additional equity capital or other strategic transactions in the near term to provide additional liquidity. There can be no assurance that management will be successful in executing these strategies as anticipated or in a timely manner or that increased revenues will reduce further operating losses. If the Company is unable to significantly increase cash flow or obtain additional financing, it will likely be unable to generate sufficient capital to fund operations for the next twelve months and may be required to pursue other means of financing that may not be on terms favorable to the Company or its stockholders. These factors among others may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The financial statements presented herein do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. As discussed in Notes 3 and 8, the Company recently completed a private placement of its common stock wherein it raised $1,247 of new capital. Management expects that it will be able to raise additional capital and to continue to fund operations and also expects that increased revenues will reduce its operating losses in future periods, however, there can be no assurance that management's plan will be executed as anticipated. F-37 USE OF ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and has applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock option plan been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plan consistent with the method required by SFAS No. 123, the Company's net loss and diluted net loss per common share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below.
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 2003 ------- ------- (unaudited) Net loss applicable to common stockholders ................. $(2,636) $(3,020) Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects .................................................... (332) (202) ------- ------- Pro forma loss applicable to common stockholders ........... $(2,968) $(3,222) ======= ======= Earnings per share: Basic and diluted, as reported ............................. $ (0.09) $ (0.19) Basic and diluted, pro forma ............................... $ (0.10) $ (0.20)
The fair value of the Company's stock-based awards to employees was estimated as of the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, using the following weighted-average assumptions for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as follows: Expected life (in years)................ 4.36 years Expected volatility..................... 113.17% Risk free interest rate................. 4.00% Expected dividend yield................. 0% The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2004, about shares of Common Stock outstanding and available for issuance under the Company's existing equity compensation plans: the Level 8 Systems, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Incentive Plan, the 1995 Non-Qualified Option Plan and the Outside Director Stock Option Plan. The Company's stockholders approved all of the Company's Equity Compensation Plans. SHARES ----------- Outstanding on January 1, 2004 ....................... 5,625,878 Granted .............................................. 2,557,754 Exercised ............................................ (47,754) Forfeited ............................................ (485,008) Outstanding on March 31, 2004 ........................ 7,650,870 Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options $ 1.12 Shares available for future grants on March 31, 2004 . 2,038,319 F-38 NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 or FIN 46 "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities", an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements". In October 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 46-6, "Effective Date of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" deferring the effective date for applying the provisions of FIN 46 for public entities' interests in variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 for financial statements of interim or annual periods that end after December 15, 2003. FIN 46 establishes accounting guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities that function to support the activities of the primary beneficiary. In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46 (revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." This revised interpretation is effective for all entities no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. The Company has no investment in or contractual relationship or other business relationship with a variable interest entity and therefore the adoption of this interpretation did not have any impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, if the Company enters into any such arrangement with a variable interest entity in the future or an entity with which we have a relationship is reconsidered based on guidance in FIN 46 to be a variable interest entity, the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations might be materially impacted. NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS In January 2004, the Company acquired certain and liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail, a federally certified encryption software company. The Company has classified this acquisition in the Messaging and Application segment. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company issued 2,027,027 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37. The total purchase price of the assets and certain liabilities being acquired was $750, plus certain liabilities and has been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. The Company agreed to register the common stock for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The purchase price of $800 was allocated to software technology acquired valued at $213 of which $168 is remaining and accrued expenses of $50 based on the Company's estimates of fair value at the acquisition date. The Company assessed the net realizable value of the Ensuredmail software technology acquired. The purchase price exceeded the amounts allocated to the software technology and liabilities acquired by approximately $587. This excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the assets acquired less liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill and charged to the Statement of Operations for the period ended March 31, 2004. The results of operation are included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations as of and since January 9, 2004, the effective date of the acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of the acquisition was not material to the consolidated results of operations. NOTE 4. SOFTWARE PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY As noted above, in January 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets assumed and certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail. The purchase price of the assets, net of certain liabilities, was $750. The Company has assessed the net realizable value of the Ensuredmail software technology acquired. The purchase price exceeded the amounts allocated to the software technology and liabilities assumed by approximately $587. This excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the assets acquired less liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill and charged to the Statement of Operations for the period ended March 31, 2004. Software technology acquired will be amortized over three years. Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2004 was respectively $775 and $654. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows: 2004 (remaining 9 months) $1,873 2005 1,685 2006 59 2007 5 2008 -- F-39 NOTE 5. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES At March 31, 2003, the Company's accrual for restructuring was $633, which was primarily comprised of excess facility costs, which the Company believed represented its remaining cash obligations for the restructuring changes. Subsequent to September 30, 2003, the Company settled litigation relating to these excess facility costs. Accordingly, the Company reversed the restructuring balance during the fourth quarter of 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to assign the note receivable from the sale of Geneva to EM Software Solutions, Inc., with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the note receivable should the note obligor, EM Software Solutions, Inc., default on future payments. The unpaid principal portion of the note receivable assigned was approximately $463 and matures December 2007. The Company assessed the probability of liability under the recourse provisions using a probability weighted cash flow analysis and has recognized a long-term liability in the amount of $131. NOTE 6. SHORT TERM CONVERTIBLE NOTES In March 2004, the Company converted a promissory note into a convertible loan agreement with Mark and Carolyn Landis, who are related by marriage to Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in the amount of $125. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan is convertible into 446,429 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 446,429 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.28. The warrants expire in three years. Also in March 2004, the Company entered into convertible loan agreements with two other individual investors, each in the face amount of $50. Under the terms of the agreement, each loan is convertible into 135,135 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 135,135 shares of our common stock at $0.37 per share. The warrants expire in three years. These obligations are included in Short-term debt on the Company's Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2004. NOTE 7. SENIOR CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK On March 19, 2003, the Company completed a $3,500 private placement of Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series D Preferred Stock"), convertible at a conversion ratio of $0.32 per share of common stock into an aggregate of 11,031,250 shares of common stock. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,158,780 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share ("Series D-1 Warrants"). On October 10, 2003, the Company, consistent with its obligations, also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,665,720 shares of common stock at an exercise price the lesser of $0.20 per share or market price at the time of exercise ("Series D-2 Warrants"). The Series D-2 Warrants became exercisable on November 1, 2003 because the Company failed to report $6,000 in gross revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003. Both existing and new investors participated in the financing. The Company also agreed to register the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock and exercise of the warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Under the terms of the financing agreement, a redemption event may occur if any one person, entity or group shall control more than 35% of the voting power of the Company's capital stock. The Company allocated the proceeds received from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock and warrants to the preferred stock and detachable warrants on a relative fair value basis, resulting in the allocation of $2,890 to the Series D Preferred Stock and $640 to the detachable warrants. Based upon the allocation of the proceeds, the Company determined that the effective conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock was less than the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. The beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a discount on the value of the Series D Preferred Stock and an increase in additional paid-in capital. Because the Series D Preferred Stock was convertible immediately upon issuance, the Company fully amortized such beneficial conversion feature on the date of issuance. As part of the financing, the Company and the lead investors have agreed to form a joint venture to exploit the Cicero technology in the Asian market. The terms of the agreement required that the Company deposit $1,000 of the gross proceeds from the financing into escrow to fund the joint venture. The escrow agreement allows for the immediate release of funds to cover organizational costs of the joint venture. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, $225 of escrowed funds was released. Since the joint venture was not formed and operational on or by July 17, 2003, the lead investors have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium, less their pro-rata share of expenses. The Company and the lead investor have mutually agreed to extend the escrow release provisions until May 31, 2004. F-40 Another condition of the financing required the Company to place an additional $1,000 of the gross proceeds into escrow, pending the execution of a definitive agreement with Merrill Lynch providing for the sale of all rights, title and interest to the Cicero technology. Since a transaction with Merrill Lynch for the sale of Cicero was not consummated by May 18, 2003, the lead investors have the right, but not the obligation, to require the Company to purchase $1,000 in liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock at a 5% per annum premium. During the second quarter of 2003, $390 of escrowed funds was released. In addition, the Company and the lead investor agreed to extend the escrow release provisions until the end of July 2003 when all remaining escrow monies were released to the Company. NOTE 8. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY As described in Note 3, Acquisitions, in January 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail, a federally certified encryption software company. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company issued 2,027,027 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. The total purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, was $750 and has been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. Also in January 2004, and simultaneously with the asset purchase of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., the Company completed a Securities Purchase Agreement with several new investors as well as certain investors of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., wherein the Company raised $1,247 through the sale of 3,369,192 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase 3,369,192 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.37. The warrants expire three years from the date of grant. NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." The Company's effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the fact that no income tax benefit was recorded for the net loss for the first quarter of fiscal year 2004 or 2003. Because of the Company's recurring losses, the deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. NOTE 10. LOSS PER SHARE Basic loss per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and any potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented include stock options, warrants and preferred stock. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net loss to loss available to common stockholders:
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 2003 -------- -------- Net loss, as reported ................................... $ (2,636) $ (3,020) Accretion of preferred stock ............................ -- 640 -------- -------- Loss applicable to common stockholders, as adjusted ..... $ (2,636) $ (3,660) ======== ======== Basic and diluted loss per share: Loss per share continuing operations ............... $ (0.09) $ (0.19) Loss per share discontinued operations ............. -- -- -------- -------- Net loss per share applicable to common shareholders $ (0.09) $ (0.19) Weighted common shares outstanding - basic and diluted 30,727 19,233
F-41 The following table sets forth the potential shares that are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented: MARCH 31, 2004 2003 ---------- ---------- Stock options, common share equivalent . 7,650,870 4,982,028 Warrants, common share equivalent ...... 14,295,898 9,957,579 Preferred stock, common share equivalent 14,062,136 18,695,440 ---------- ---------- 36,008,904 33,635,047 ========== ========== Accretion of the preferred stock arises as a result of the beneficial conversion feature realized in the sale of preferred stock. NOTE 11. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Management makes operating decisions and assesses performance of the Company's operations based on the following reportable segments: Desktop Integration segment and Messaging and Application Engineering segment. The principal product in the Desktop Integration segment is Cicero. Cicero is a business integration software product that maximizes end-user productivity, streamlines business operations and integrates disparate systems and applications. The products that comprise the Messaging and Application Engineering segment is Geneva Integration Broker and the encryption technology products, Email Encryption Gateway, Software Development Kit (SDK), Digital Signature Module, Business Desktop, and Personal Desktop. Segment data includes a charge allocating all corporate-headquarters costs to each of its operating segments based on each segment's proportionate share of expenses. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on earnings (loss) before interest and other income/(expense), taxes, and in-process research and development. While segment profitability should not be construed as a substitute for operating income or a better indicator of liquidity than cash flows from operating activities, which are determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, it is included herein to provide additional information with respect to our ability to meet our future debt service, capital expendituredevelopment, and working capital requirements. Segment profitability is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. The non-GAAP measures presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. restructuring.

The table below presents information about reported segments for the threetwelve months ended MarchDecember 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and 2003: MESSAGING AND DESKTOP APPLICATION INTEGRATION ENGINEERING TOTAL ----------- ----------- ----- 2004: Total revenue ........................ $ 77 $ 6 $ 83 Total cost of revenue ................ 1,058 45 1,103 Gross margin (loss) .................. (981) (39) (1,020) Total operating expenses ............. 988 130 1,118 Segment profitability (loss) ......... $(1,969) $ (169) $(2,138) 2003: Total revenue ........................ $ 119 $ 24 $ 143 Total cost of revenue ................ 1,138 42 1,180 Gross margin (loss) .................. (1,019) (18) (1,037) Total operating expenses ............. 1,500 88 1,588 Segment profitability (loss) ......... $(2,519) $ (106) $(2,625) F-42 (in thousands):

  
For the year ended December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
  Desktop Integration Messaging and Application Engineering Total Desktop Integration Messaging and Application Engineering Total Desktop Integration Messaging and Application Engineering Total 
Total revenue $965   $7   $972   $760   $25   $785   $707   $68   $775 
Total cost of revenue  767  --  767  1,188  --  1,188  5,662  213  5,875 
Gross margin (loss)  198  7  205  (428) 25  (403) (4,955) (145) (5,100)
Total operating expenses  1,964  121  2,085  2,536  119  2,655  3,348  373  3,721 
Segment profitability (loss) $(1,766)$(114)$(1,880)$(2,964)$(94)$(3,058)$(8,303)$(518)$(8,821)

F-24

A reconciliation of total segment operating expenses to total operating expenses for the quarters ended March 31: THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, ----------------------- 2004 2003 ------ ------ Total segment operating expenses ............. $1,118 $1,588 Loss on disposal of assets ................... -- 487 Impairment of intangible assets .............. 587 -- ------ ------ Total operating expenses ..................... $1,705 $2,075 ====== ====== expense follows (numbers are in thousands):

  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Segment operating expenses $2,085 $2,655 $3,721 
Write-off of intangible assets  --  
--
  587 
(Gain) on disposal of assets  (24) 
--
  (5)
Total operating expenses $2,061 $2,655 $4,303 

A reconciliation of total segment profitability (loss) to net loss before provision for income taxes for the quartersfiscal years ended March 31: THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, ------------------------ 2004 2003 ------- ------- Total segment profitability (loss) ........... $(2,138) $(2,625) Change December 31(in fair value of warrant liability .... 19 148 Loss on disposal of assets ................... -- (487) Impairment of intangible assets .............. (587) -- Interest and other income/(expense), net ..... 79 (10) ------- ------- Total loss before income taxes ............... $(2,627) $(2,974) ======= ======= thousands):

  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Total segment profitability (loss) $(1,880)$(3,058)$(8,821)
Write-off of intangible assets  --  --  (587)
Gain/ on disposal of assets  24  --  5 
           
Interest and other income/(expense), net  (1,141) (623) (328)
Net loss before provision for income taxes $(2,997)$(3,681)$(9,731)


The following table presents a summary of long-lived assets by segment: MARCHsegment as of December 31 ----------------------(in thousands):

  
2006
 
2005
 
Desktop Integration 
$
15
 
$
10
 
Messaging/Application Engineering  -  - 
        
Total assets 
$
15
 
$
10
 

The following table presents a summary of revenue by geographic region for the years ended December 31(in thousands):

  
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
        
Denmark $- $- $7 
Italy  -  2  4 
United Kingdom  -  -  1 
USA  972  783  762 
Other  -  -  1 
           
  
$
972
 
$
785
 
$
775
 

Presentation of revenue by region is based on the country in which the customer is domiciled. As of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, 2003 ------ ------ Desktop Integration ............................ $3,477 $7,312 Messagingall of the long-lived assets of the Company are located in the United States.


NOTE 14.
RELATED PARTY INFORMATION

Liraz Systems Ltd., the Company’s former principal stockholder guarantees certain debt obligations of the Company. In November 2006, the Company and Application Engineering .......... 168Liraz agreed to extend the guarantee and with the approval of the lender, agreed to extend the maturity of the debt obligation until October 31, ------ ------ Total assets ................................... $3,645 $7,343 ====== ====== NOTE 12. CONTINGENCIES Litigation. 2007. The Company issued 6,000,000 shares of common stock (pre reverse stock split) to Liraz in exchange for this debt extension. In November 2005, the Company and Liraz agreed to extend the guarantee and with the approval of the lender, agreed to extend the maturity of the debt obligation until October 30, 2006. The Company issued 2,400,000 shares of common stock and granted a warrant to purchase an additional 3,600,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.002 per

F-25


share to Liraz in exchange for this debt extension. In 2004, the Company and Liraz also agreed to extend the guarantee and maturity of the debt obligation until November 2005. The Company agreed to issue Liraz 3,942,000 shares of stock for that extension.

During 2006, under an existing reseller agreement, the Company recognized $100,000 of software revenue with Pilar Services, Inc. Pilar Services is presently owned and managed by Charles Porciello who is a member of our Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2006, the receivable was still outstanding and the Company has reserved for possible doubtful accounts.

From time to time during 2005 and 2004, the Company entered into short term notes payable with Anthony Pizi, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and current Chief Information Officer. The Notes bear interest at 1% per month and are unsecured. At December 31, 2006, the Company was indebted to Mr. Pizi in the amount of $9,000.

Convertible Promissory Notes: Directors and executive officers made the following loans to the Company for convertible promissory notes: In June 2004, the Company entered into a convertible loan agreement with Mr. Pizi in the amount of $100,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 270,270 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 270,270 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.37. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 14 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock.In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

In July 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. Pizi in the face amount of $112,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 560,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 560,000 shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 78.4 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock.In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled. Also in July 2004, Mr. Pizi entered into a second convertible promissory note in the face amount of $15,000 which bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into 90,118 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 90,118 shares of our common stock at $0.17 per share. All such warrants expire three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 12.62 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

In March 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. and Mrs. Mark Landis in the amount of $125,000. Mr. Landis is the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Mr. and Mrs. Landis are parents-in-law to Mr. Pizi, the Company’s Chief Information Officer.Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible upon the option of the note holder into 446,429 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 446,429 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.28. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 62.5 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock.In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

In June 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. and Mrs. Landis in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into 781,250 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 781,250 shares of Level 8 common stock exercisable at $0.16 per share. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 113.64 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

In October 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Mr. and Mrs. Landis in the amount of $100,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into 1,000,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $0.10 per share. The warrants expire in three years. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 400 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

F-26


In November 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Mark and Carolyn Landis, in the amount of $150,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into 1,875,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 1,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $0.08 per share. All such warrants expire three years from the date of grant. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 750 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

In June 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Fredric Mack, a former director of the Company, in the amount of $125,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bears interest at 1% per month, and is convertible into 390,625 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 390,625 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $0.32 per share. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 54.69 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

In April 2005, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Bruce Miller, a director of the Company, in the amount of $30,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into 428,571 shares of the Company’s common stock. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 60 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock.In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

In July 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Nicholas Hatalski, who until July 22, 2005 (during the period when the terms of the recapitalization merger were being negotiated and at the time of approval of the recapitalization merger by our board of directors), was a director of the Company, in the amount of $25,000. Under the terms of the note, the loan bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into 78,125 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 78,125 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $0.32 per share. As part of the recapitalization plan, the Company has offered to lower that conversion rate and exchange the note for 10.94 shares of Series A-1 preferred stock.In November 2006, the Noteholder consented to the amended conversion rate and the Note has been cancelled.

All of such warrants expire three years from date of grant.

Senior Reorganization Notes. From March 2004 to April 2005, directors and executive officers made the following loans to us for Senior Reorganization Notes: Mr. Pizi held $423,333 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 571,659 shares of Cicero common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share.

Mr. Landis held $327,860 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 442,345 shares of Cicero common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share.

Mr. Mack held, together with his affiliates, $88,122 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 112,205 shares of Cicero common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share.

Mr. Miller held, together with his affiliates, $77,706 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 114,597 shares of Cicero common stock at a purchase price of $0.20.

Mr. Atherton held, together with his affiliates, $20,000 of Senior Reorganization Notes which were converted into warrants to purchase an additional 289,856 shares of Cicero common stock at a purchase price of $0.20.

Mr. Broderick, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, held $2,300 of Senior Reorganization Notes, which were converted into warrants to purchase 3,222 shares of the Cicero Inc. common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share, and options to purchase 12,609 shares of common stock under the Company’s stock option plan that will convert into options to purchase Cicero common stock.

Such warrants are only issuable upon approval of the recapitalization merger, and were automatically exercised in connection with the consummation of the recapitalization plan.

F-27


Convertible Bridge Notes. From July 2005 to December 2006, directors and executive officers made the following loans to the Company for Convertible Bridge Notes:

Mr. Pizi held $85,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bore interest at 10% and matured on September 15, 2005. These notes automatically converted into 680,000 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Landis held $395,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bore interest at 10% and matured on various dates in 2005 and 2006. These notes automatically converted into 3,160,000 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Mack held, together with his affiliates, $114,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured on various dates in 2005 and 2006. These notes automatically converted into 897,564 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Miller held, together with his affiliates, $120,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured on various dates in 2005 and 2006. These notes automatically converted into 947,273 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Bruce Hasenyager, a member of our Board of Directors, held $4,061 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured on September 15, 2005. These notes automatically converted into 32,485 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Bruce Percelay, a member of our Board of Directors, held $130,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured on various dates in 2005 and 2006. These notes automatically converted into 1,027,273 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. John W. Atherton, a member of our Board of Directors, held $15,000 of convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured during 2006. These notes automatically converted into 120,000 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.

Mr. Charles Porciello, a member of our Board of Directors, held $10,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes which bear interest at 10% and matured during 2006. These notes automatically converted into 80,000 shares of Cicero common stock upon approval of the recapitalization plan by stockholders.
NOTE 15.
LEASE COMMITMENTS

The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under various operating leases. Future minimum lease commitments on operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2006 consisted of only one lease as follows (in thousands):

  Lease Commitments 
    
2007 
$
59
 
2008  6 
  $65 

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $60,000, $122,000, and $197,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company had no sublease arrangements.
NOTE 16.
CONTINGENCIES

Various lawsuits and claims have been brought against the Companyus in the normal course of our business. In January 2003, an action was brought against us in the Circuit Court of Loudon County, Virginia, for a breach of a real estate lease. The case was settled in August 2003. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, we agreed to assign a note receivable with recourse equal to the unpaid portion of the note should the note obligor default on future payments. The unpaid balance of the note was $545,000, of which the current unpaid principal portion is approximately

F-28


$123,000 and it matures in December 2007. At the maturity of the Note, the Company will be liable for approximately $31,000 which we have recognized in our non current debt.

In October 2003, the Company waswe were served with a summons and complaint in Superior Court of North Carolina regarding unpaid invoices for services rendered to the Company by one of its vendors.our subcontractors. The amount in dispute iswas approximately $200$200,000 and is included in accounts payable. Subsequent to March 31, 2004, we settled this litigation was settled.litigation. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Companywe agreed to pay a total of $189$189,000 plus interest over a nineteen month19-month period ending November 15, 2005. The Company is in the process of negotiating a series of payments for the remaining liability of approximately $80,000.

In March 2004, the Company waswe were served with a summons and complaint in Superior Court of North Carolina regarding a security deposit for a sublease in Virginia. The amount in dispute is approximately $247.$247,000. In October 2004, we reached a settlement agreement wherein we agreed to pay $160,000 over a 36-month period ending October 2007.

In August 2004, we were notified that we were in default under an existing lease agreement for office facilities in Princeton, New Jersey. The amount of the default is approximately $65,000. Under the terms of the lease agreement, we may be liable for future rents should the space remain vacant. We have reached a settlement agreement with the landlord which calls for a total payment of $200,000 over a 36-month period ending October 2007.

In October 2005, we were notified that Critical Mass Mail, Inc. had filed a claim against us in the amount of $45,000 for failure to pay certain liabilities under an Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 9, 2004. We in turn filed a counter claim that Critical Mass Mail, Inc. failed to deliver certain assets and other documents under the same Asset Purchase Agreement. We had already reserved the potential liability under this action as part of the asset purchase accounting. In February, 2006, Critical Mass Mail amended their complaint and is seeking damages of approximately $600,000 for our failure to timely register the underlying securities issued in the Asset Purchase Agreement. In November 2006, we negotiated a settlement with Critical Mass Mail that provides for monthly payments of the amounts already accrued. In December 2006 we settled the amended complaint and agreed to issue $50,000 worth of the Company’s common stock. The Company disagrees withhas recorded stock compensation expense as of December 31, 2006 in this allegation although it has reserved for this contingency. amount.

Under the indemnification clause of the Company'sCompany’s standard reseller agreements and software license agreements, the Company agrees to defend the reseller/licensee against third party claims asserting infringement by the Company'sCompany’s products of certain intellectual property rights, which may include patents, copyrights, trademarks or trade secrets, and to pay any judgementsjudgments entered on such claims against the reseller/licensee. NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS On April 12, 2004,


NOTE 17.
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
  
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
  
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
2006:         
Net revenues 
 
$
281
 
$
320
 
$
248
 
$
123
 
Gross margin/(loss)  
75
  
114
  
60
  
(44
)
Net loss  
(576
)
 
(515
)
 
(647
)
 
(1,259
)
Net loss/share -basic and diluted 
$
(1.20
)
$
(1.07
)
$
(1.35
)
$
(0.25
)
              
2005:             
Net revenues 
 
$
153
 $461 $84 $87 
Gross margin/(loss)  (179) 106  (201) (129)
Net loss  (1,031) (738) (943) (969)
Net loss/share -basic and diluted $(2.37)$(1.70)$(2.12)$(2.08)

F-29

NOTE 18.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In February 2007, the Company entered intoraised a short term note payable with Anthony Pizi,total of $500,000 from a private sale of its common stock. Under the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The note, interms of the face amountsale, the Company issued 3,723,008 shares of $100, bears interest at 1% per month and is convertible into common stock to a consortium of investors.These securities were issued under the exemption offered by Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Company at a conversion rateSecurities Act of $0.37 per share. In addition, Mr. Pizi was granted 270,270 warrants to purchase the Company's common stock at $0.37 per share. These warrants expire three years from the date of grant. F-43 1933.

F-30


PART II INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS ITEM 13: OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

Item 13:
Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses to be paid in connection with the common stock being registered, all of which will be paid by Level 8 Systems,Cicero Inc. (on behalf of itself and the selling stockholders) in connection with this offering. All amounts are estimates except for the registration fee. SEC Registration Fee ..................... $ 548 Accounting Fees and Expenses ............. 20,000 Legal Fees and Expenses .................. 30,000 Miscellaneous ............................ 1,452 Total .................................... $52,000 ITEM 14: INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
SEC Registration Fee $1,385 
Accounting Fees and Expenses  5,000 
Legal Fees and Expenses  30,000 
Miscellaneous  1,590 
Total $37,975 

Item 14:
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits indemnification of directors, officers, employees and agents of corporations for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The registrant'sregistrant’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for indemnification of the registrant'sregistrant’s directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Statutory Provisions Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law enables a corporation in its certificate of incorporation to eliminate or limit the personal liability of members of its board of directors to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for violations of a director'sdirector’s fiduciary duty of care. The provision would have no effect on the availability of equitable remedies, such as an injunction or rescission, for breach of fiduciary duty. In addition, no provision may eliminate or limit the liability of a director for breaching his duty of loyalty, failing to act in good faith, engaging in intentional misconduct or knowingly violating a law, paying an unlawful dividend or approving an illegal stock repurchase, or obtaining an improper personal benefit.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law empowers a corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party to or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, against expenses (including attorney'sattorney’s fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. No indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for expenses which the court shall deem proper. Additionally, a corporation is required to indemnify its directors and officers against expenses to the extent that the directors or officers have been successful on the merits or otherwise in any action, suit or proceeding or in defense of any claim, issue or matter.
An indemnification can be made by the corporation only upon a determination that indemnification is proper in the circumstances because the party seeking indemnification has met the applicable standard of conduct as set forth in the Delaware General Corporation Law. The indemnification provided by the Delaware General Corporation Law shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise. A corporation also has the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify him against such liability. The indemnification provided by the Delaware General Corporation Law shall, unless otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of the person. The Company'sCompany’s certificate of incorporation limits a director'sdirector’s liability for monetary damages to our company and our stockholders for breaches of fiduciary duty except under the circumstances outlined in the Delaware General Corporation Law as described above.

II-1


The registrant'sregistrant’s certificate of incorporation extends indemnification rights to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law to directors and officers involved in any action, suit or proceeding where the basis of the involvement is the person'sperson’s alleged action in an official capacity or in any other capacity while serving as a director or officer of the registrant. ITEM 15: RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
Item 15:
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

In April 2004,February 2007, we entered intocompleted a convertible loan agreement with Anthony Pizi, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in the amountprivate sale of $100,000.shares of our common stock to a group of investors, two of which are members of our Board of Directors. Under the terms of that agreement, we sold 3,723,008 shares of our common stock for $0.1343 per share for a total of $0.5 million. Participating in this consortium was Mr. Mark Landis, who is our current Chairman and Mr. Bruce Miller, who is a Board member. Mr. Landis acquired 77,460 shares for a $10,000 investment and Mr. Miller acquired 148,920 shares for a $20,000 investment.
During 2005 and 2006, we entered into several Convertible Bridge Notes with a consortium of investors. These notes bear interest at 10% and matured at various dates beginning on September 15, 2005. The Notes converted into shares of the agreement,Company’s common stock at conversion rates of $0.125 and $0.133. As of December 31, 2006, we had raised $3,915,000 of Convertible Bridge Notes of which $746,000 was from various members of the loan is convertibleour Board of Directors. These notes automatically converted into 270,27030,508,448 shares of the common stock upon approval of the Plan of Recapitalization. Accordingly, this conversion has been reflected in our accompanying Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006.

As part of the Plan of Recapitalization, Senior Reorganization Notes were offered at a special one-time exercise price of $0.10 per share, (i) received and exercised Additional Warrants exercisable into shares of Common Stock, by applying the accrued interest on their Senior Reorganization Notes and by cashless exercise to the extent of the balance of the exercise price, (ii) holders of existing warrants who advanced the exercise price of their warrants to us, exercised their existing warrants automatically and (iii) those Senior Reorganization Noteholders who loaned us the first $1,000,000 in respect of the exercise price of their existing warrants received our Early Adopter at a ratio of 2:1 for shares issuable upon exercise of each existing warrant exercised at the special exercise price of $10.00 per share. Approximately $2,309,000 of the Senior Reorganization Noteholders received 3,438,473 shares of our common stock and 201,115 warrants to purchase 270,270 shares of our common stock exercisable at $0.37. The warrants expire in three years. These shares are being issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. On March 1, 2004, we entered into a consulting services agreement with Mr. Ralph F. Martino. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to issue 66,667 shares per month, up to an aggregate of 200,001 shares of our common stock, as compensation for services rendered over the following three month period. These shares are being issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. On March 1, 2004, we entered into a reseller/consulting agreement with Pyxislink. Under the terms of the agreement, we agreed to issue warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock quarterly, over the next four quarters. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the issue date and the exercise price is $0.38 per share. These shares are being issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. In January 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., d/b/a Ensuredmail, a federally certified encryption software company. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, Level 8 issued 2,027,027 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. Also in January 2004, and simultaneously with the asset purchase of Critical Mass Mail, Inc., the Company completed a common stock financing round wherein it raised $1,247 of capital from several new investors as well as certain investors of Critical Mass Mail, Inc. The Company sold 3,369,192 shares of common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase 3,369,192 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.37. The warrants expire three years from the date of grant. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. On March 19, 2003, the Company completed a $3.7 million private placement of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series D Preferred Stock"), convertible at a conversion ratio of $0.32 per share of common stock into an aggregate of 11,578,125 shares of common stock. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,364,952201,115 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.07$10 per share ("share.

During 2004 and 2005 we issued $992,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Promissory Notes. As part of the recapitalization plan, these Noteholders were offered reduced conversion prices to convert their notes into shares of our Series D-1 Warrants").A-1 preferred stock. All Noteholders agreed to convert their notes into shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. The Company is also obligated to issuehas cancelled these notes and issued 1,591 shares of its Series A-1 preferred stock and 44,232 warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,748,298for 44,232 shares of common stock exercisable at ana range of $8 to $37 per share. The exercise price the greater of $0.2018,750 warrants is $8 per share, or market price at the time of issuance on or before September 1, 2003 ("Series D-2 Warrants"). The Series D-2 Warrants will become exercisable on November 1, 2003, but only if the Company fails to report $6 million in gross revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2003. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. On December 31, 2002, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,462,801 warrants to purchase common stock to the holders of Series A3 Preferred Stock and Series B3 Preferred Stock. These shares were issued pursuant to our agreement with such stockholders to issue warrants upon the closing of the sale of Series C Preferred Stock on August 14, 2002. The20,000 warrants are exercisable at $0.40$10 per share, 901 warrants are exercisable at $17 per share, 2,706 are exercisable at $20 per share, and are1,875 exercisable for 5 years. Such warrants were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. The Company did not receive proceeds from the issuance of the warrants. When the warrants are exercised, the Company expects to use the proceeds from the exercise for general corporate purposes. II-2 On October 25, 2002, the Company effected an exchange of all of our outstanding shares of Series A2 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A2 Preferred Stock") and Series B2 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B2 Preferred Stock") and related warrants for an equal number of shares of newly created Series A3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A3 Preferred Stock") and Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B3 Preferred Stock") and related warrants. This exchange was made to correct a deficiency in the conversion price from the prior exchange of Series A1 and B1 Preferred Stock and related warrants for Series A2 and B2 Preferred Stock and related warrants on August 29, 2002. The conversion price for the Series A3 Preferred Stock and the conversion price for the Series B3 Preferred Stock remain the same as the previously issued Series A1 and A2 Preferred Stock and Series B1 and B2 Preferred Stock, at $8.333 and $12.531, respectively. The exercise price for the aggregate 753,640 warrants relating to the Series A3 Preferred Stock was increased from $0.38 to $0.40 per share which is a reduction from the $1.77 exercise price of the warrants relating to the Series A1 Preferred Stock. The exercise price for the aggregate 1,047,382 warrants relating to the Series B3 Preferred Stock was increased from $0.38 to $0.40 per share which is a reduction from the $1.77 exercise price of the warrants relating to the Series B1 Preferred Stock. The adjusted exercise price was based on the closing price of the Company's Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock and warrants on August 14, 2002, plus $0.02, to reflect accurate current market value according to relevant Nasdaq rules. This adjustment was made as part of the agreement under which the holders of the Company's Preferred Stock agreed to waive their price-protection anti-dilution protections to allow the Company to issue the Series C Preferred Stock and warrants without triggering the price-protection anti-dilution provisions and excessively diluting its common stock. The shares issued pursuant to the exchange agreement were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933 for an exchange by an issuer with its exiting security holders. On August 29, 2002, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with its existing preferred shareholders. Under the terms of the agreement, the holders of the Series A1 and Series B1 4% convertible redeemable preferred stock and related common stock warrants received an equal number of preferred shares of the new Series A2 and Series B2 convertible redeemable preferred stock and related warrants. The conversion price of both the Series A1 and Series B1 preferred stock remained the same. The exercise price for the warrants received in the exchange was reduced to $0.38$37 per share. A total of 1,801,022 warrants were exchanged. The shares issued pursuant to the exchange agreement were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933 for an exchange by an issuer with its exiting security holders. On August 14, 2002, the Company completed a $1.6 million private placement of Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred Stock"), convertible at a conversion ratio of $0.38 per share of common stock into an aggregate of 4,184,211 shares of common stock. As part of the financing, the Company has also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,046,053 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.38 per share. As consideration for the $1.6 million private placement, the Company received approximately $1.4 million in cash and allowed certain debt holders to convert approximately $200,000 of debt to equity. The Chairman and CEO of the Company, Tony Pizi, converted $150,000 of debt owed to Mr. Pizi into shares of Series C Preferred Stock and warrants. Both existing and new investors participated in the financing. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. On June 27, 2002, the Company issued 60,901 shares of common stock to a former executive officer of the company as part of a separation agreement. These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. On January 16, 2002, the Company issued 141,658 shares of common stock to a former reseller of the company as part of a settlement agreement with that company. Such shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. II-3 On January 16, 2002, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with several investors wherein the Company agreed to sell up to three million shares of its common stock and warrants. The common stock was valued at $1.50 per share and warrants to purchase additional shares were issued with an 14 exercise price of $2.75 per share. This offering closed on January 16, 2002. Of the 3,000,000 shares, the Company sold 2,381,952 shares of common stock for a total of $3.5 million and granted 476,396 warrants to purchase the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.75 per share. The warrants expire in three years from the date of grant and have a call feature that forces exercise if the Company's common stock exceeds $5.50 per share. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. On January 3, 2002, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with MLBC, Inc., an affiliate of Merrill Lynch. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock to MLBC, Inc. These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. In December 2001, the Company issued 141,658 shares of common stock to a former reseller of the company as part of a settlement agreement with that company. Such shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. In October 2001, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with its existing preferred shareholders. Under the terms of the agreement, the holders of the Series A and Series B 4% convertible redeemable preferred stock and related common stock warrants received an equal number of preferred shares of the new Series A1 and Series B1 convertible redeemable preferred stock and related warrants. The conversion price of both the Series A1 and Series B1 preferred stock was reduced by 16.7% and 50% respectively, which increased the number of shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion of the preferred shares by 1,428,512 shares to a total of 3,782,519 shares. Additionally, the exercise price for the warrants received in the exchange was reduced to $1.77 per share and the call prices have been reduced accordingly to $5.00 per share for the Series A1 warrants and $7.50 per share for the Series B1 warrants. At total of 1,801,022 warrants were exchanged. The shares issued pursuant to the exchange agreement were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933 for an exchange by an issuer with its exiting security holders. On May 21, 2001, the Company issued Arik Kilman, former CEO and Chairman of the Company, 250,000 shares of common stock as part of Mr. Kilman's severance agreement with the Company. Such shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D and on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. ITEM 16: EXHIBITS AND


Item 16:
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE Financial Statement Schedules SCHEDULES
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted. II-4 Exhibits
EXHIBITS

The exhibits listed under here below are filed as part of this Form S-1 : EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION - ------ ----------- 2.1 S-1:
Exhibit Number
Description
2.1Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2004, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Critical Mass Mail, Inc. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.1 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed January 23, 2004).

II-2

3.1Certificate of Incorporation of Level 8 Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as amended and restated December 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007).
3.2Certificate of Designation relating to Series A1 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007).
3.3Certificate of Designation relating to Series A3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, as amended December 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.3 to Level 8’s Level 8’s Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007).
3.4Certificate of Designation relating to Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred as amended December 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.4 to Level 8’s Level 8’s Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007).
3.5Certificate of designation relating to Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock as amended December 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.5 to Level 8’s Level 8’s Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007).
3.6Certificate of designation relating to Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock as amended December 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.5 to Level 8’s Level 8’s Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007).

II-3


3.7Certificate of Incorporation of Level 8 Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as amended August 4, 2003 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8’s Form 10-K filed March 31, 2004).
3.8Bylaws of Level 8 Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to Level 8’s Form 10-K filed April 2, 2002).
3.9Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights dated March 19, 2003 relating to Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003).
3.10Certificate of Designation relating to Series A3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8’s Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002).
3.11Certificate of Designation relating to Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8’s Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002).
3.12Certificate of designation relating to Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8’d Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002).
Registration Rights Agreement dated February 2007, by and among Cicero Inc. and the Purchasers in the 2007 Private Placement listed on Schedule I thereto relating to the Security Purchasers Agreement dated as of December 13, 2002, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc., Level 8 Technologies, Inc. and EMSoftware Solutions, Inc. (exhibits and schedules omitted but will be furnished supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed December 30, 2002). 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Level 8 Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as amended August 4, 2003 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8's Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004). 3.2 Bylaws of Level 8 Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to Level 8's Form 10-K filed April 2, 2002). 3.3 Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights dated March 19, 2003 relating to Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003). 3.4 Certificate of Designation relating to Series A3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002). 3.5 Certificate of Designation relating to Series B3 Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002). 3.6 Certificate of designation relating to Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002). 4.1 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 19, 2003 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers listed on Schedule I thereto relating to the Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003). 4.2 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 15, 2003 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the October Private Placement listed on schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to Level 8's Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004) 4.3 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2002, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the January Private Placement listed on Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 25, 2002). 4.4 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2002, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and MLBC, Inc. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2002). 4.5 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002, entered into by and between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the holders of Series A2/A3 Preferred Stock and Series B2/B3 Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed August 30, 2002). 4.5A First Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2002, entered into by and between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the holders of Series A2/A3 Preferred Stock and Series B2/B3 Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002). 4.7 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2002, entered into by and between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the investors in Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002). 4.8 Form of Registration Rights Agreement issued to Purchasers in the January 2004 Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2004). 4.9 Form of Registration Rights Agreement issued to Purchasers of Convertible Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2004). 4.10 Form of Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Purchasers in the January 2004 Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2004). 4.11 Form of Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Purchasers of Convertible Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.4 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2004). II-5 4.12 Form of Warrant issued to the Purchasers in the Series D Preferred Stock transaction dated as of March 19, 2003 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003) 4.12A Form of Warrant issued to the Purchasers in the Series D Preferred Stock transaction dated as of March 19, 2003 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003). 4.13 Form of Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Purchasers in the October 2003 Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.9 to Level 8's Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004). 4.14 Form of Stock Purchase Warrant issued to the Purchasers in the January Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 25, 2002). 4.15 Form of Series A3 Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of Level 8's Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002). 4.16 Form of Series B3 Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 of Level 8's Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002). 4.17 Form of Series C Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002). 5.1 Legal Opinion of Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy LLP (filed herewith). 10.1 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 2004 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the January Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2004). 10.2 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 2004 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers of Convertible Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2004). 10.3 Form of Convertible Promissory Note dated March 2004 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers of Convertible Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2004). 10.4 Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 19, 2003 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003). 10.5 Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of October 15, 2003 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the October Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004). 10.6 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2002, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the January Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 25, 2002). 10.7 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2002, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the purchasers of the Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002). 10.8 Agreement by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the holders of Series A1/A2/A3 and B1/B2/B3 Preferred Stock, dated as of August 14, 2002 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002). 10.9 Exchange Agreement among Level 8 Systems, Inc., and the various stockholders identified and listed on Schedule I, dated as of August 29, 2002 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed August 30, 2002). II-6 10.9A First Amendment to Exchange Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2002, among Level 8 Systems, Inc., and the various stockholders identified and listed on Schedule I to that certain Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002). 10.9B Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 1999, among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the investors named on the signature pages thereof for the purchase of Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed July 23, 1999). 10.9C Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2000, among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the investors named on the signature pages thereof for the purchase of Series B Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K filed July 31, 2000). 10.10 Amended PCA Shell License Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2002, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2002). 10.10A PCA Shell License Agreement between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed September 11, 2000). 10.11 Promissory Note of Level 8 Systems, Inc., dated as of September 28, 2001, among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Bank Hapoalim (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Form 10-K filed April 2, 2002). 10.11 A Amendment to Promissory Note of Level 8 Systems, Inc., dated as of November 15,2003 among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Bank Hapoalim (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10A to Level 8's Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004). 10.12 Employment Agreement between Anthony Pizi and the Company effective January 1, 2004 (filed herewith).
4.2Registration Rights Agreement dated July 2006, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the Convertible Bridge Notes listed on Schedule I thereto relating to the Security Purchasers Agreement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Cicero’s Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2007).
4.3Registration Rights Agreement dated July 2006, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the Senior Placement listed on Schedule I thereto relating to the Security Purchasers Agreement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Cicero’s Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2007).
4.4Registration Rights Agreement, dated January 2004, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the January 2004 Private Placement listed on Schedule I thereto relating to the Security Purchasers Agreement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8’s Form 10-K/A filed April 21, 2004).
4.5Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 19, 2003 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers listed on Schedule I thereto relating to the Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8’s Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003).
4.6Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 15, 2003 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the October Private Placement listed on schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to Level 8’s Form 10-K, filed March 31, 2004).
4.7Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2002, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the January Private Placement listed on Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 25, 2002).
4.8Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2002, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and MLBC, Inc. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2002).
4.9Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002, entered into by and between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the holders of Series A2/A3 Preferred Stock and Series B2/B3 Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed August 30, 2002).

II-4

4.9AFirst Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2002, entered into by and between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the holders of Series A2/A3 Preferred Stock and Series B2/B3 Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to Level 8’s Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002).
4.10Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 13, 1995, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Liraz Systems Ltd. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.24 to Across Data Systems, Inc.'s (Level 8's predecessor) Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed May 12, 1995, File No. 33-92230).
4.10AFirst Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2001, to the Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 13, 1995, by and between Across Data Systems, Inc. (Level 8's predecessor) and Liraz Systems Ltd. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed August 14, 2001).
4.11Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2002, entered into by and between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the investors in Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002).
4.12Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated January 2004, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers of Convertible Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to Level 8's Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2004).
4.13Form of Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Purchasers in the January 2004 Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to Level 8's Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2004).
4.14Form of Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Purchasers of Convertible Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to Level 8's Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2004).
4.15Form of Warrant issued to the Purchasers in the Series D Preferred Stock transaction dated as of March 19, 2003 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003).
4.16Form of Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Purchasers in the October 2003 Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.9 to Level 8’s Form 10-K, filed March31, 2004).
4.17Form of Stock Purchase Warrant issued to the Purchasers in the January Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 25, 2002).
4.18Form of Series A3 Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of Level 8’s Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002).
4.19Form of Series B3 Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 of Level 8’s Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002).
4.20Form of Series C Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002)
5.1Legal Opinion of Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP **.
Securities Purchase Agreement for 2007 Private Placement (filed herewith).
10.2Securities Purchase Agreement for Consortium IV (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Cicero’s Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2007).

II-5

10.3Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 2004 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the January 2004 Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8’s Form 10-K/A filed April 21, 2004).
10.4Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 2004 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers of Convertible Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2004).
10.5Form of Convertible Promissory Note dated March 2004 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers of Convertible Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to Level 8's Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2004).
10.6Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 19, 2003 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2003).
10.7Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of October 15, 2003 by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the October Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8’s Form 10-K, filed March 31, 2004).
10.8Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2002, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the Purchasers in the January Private Placement (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 25, 2002).
10.9Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2002, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and MLBC, Inc. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2002).
10.9APurchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2000, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K, filed August 11, 2000).
10.10Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2002, by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the purchasers of the Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002).
10.11Agreement by and among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the holders of Series A1/A2/A3 and B1/B2/B3 Preferred Stock, dated as of August 14, 2002 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed August 27, 2002).
10.12Exchange Agreement among Level 8 Systems, Inc., and the various stockholders identified and listed on Schedule I, dated as of August 29, 2002 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8’s Form 8-K filed August 30, 2002).
10.12AFirst Amendment to Exchange Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2002, among Level 8 Systems, Inc., and the various stockholders identified and listed on Schedule I to that certain Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8’s Form 10-Q filed November 15, 2002).
10.12BSecurities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 1999, among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the investors named on the signature pages thereof for the purchase of Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Form 8-K filed July 23, 1999).
10.12CSecurities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2000, among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and the investors named on the signature pages thereof for the purchase of Series B Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Level 8's Report on Form 8-K filed July 31, 2000).

II-6

10.13Amended PCA Shell License Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2002, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2002).
10.13APCA Shell License Agreement between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8’s Report on Form 8-K, filed September 11, 2000).
10.14Promissory Note of Level 8 Systems, Inc., dated as of September 28, 2001, among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Bank Hapoalim (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8’s Form 10-K filed April 2, 2002).
10.14 AAmendment No. 1 to Promissory Note of Level 8 Systems, Inc., dated as of October 30, 2006, letter dated October 30, 2006, and Late Payment Rider among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Bank Hapoalim (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 A to Cicero’s Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2007).
10.14 AAmendment No. 2 to Promissory Note of Level 8 Systems, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2005 and letter dated November 3, 2005 among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Bank Hapoalim (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 A to Cicero’s Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2007).
10.14 BAmendment No. 1 to Promissory Note of Level 8 Systems, Inc., dated as of November 8, 2004 and letter dated November 8, 2004 among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Bank Hapoalim (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14A to Level 8’s Form 10-K/A filed April 21, 2004).
10.14 CAmendment to Promissory Note of Level 8 Systems, Inc., dated as of November 15, 2003 among Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Bank Hapoalim (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10 A to Level 8’s Form 10-K, filed March 31, 2004).
10.15Employment Agreement between Anthony Pizi and the Company effective January 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to Cicero’s Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2007).*
10.16Employment Agreement between John P. Broderick and the Company effective January 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 to Cicero’s Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2007).*
10.17Level 8 Systems Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, as Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8’s Registration Statement of Form S-1/A, filed September 22, 2000, File No. 333-44588).*
10.17AFifth Amendment to Level 8 Systems Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.9A to Level 8’s Form 10-K filed April 2, 2002).*
10.17BSeventh Amendment to Level 8 Systems Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 B to Level 8’s Form 10-K, filed March 31, 2004).*
10.18Lease Agreement for Cary, N.C. offices, dated March 31, 1997, between Seer Technologies, Inc. and Regency Park Corporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.47 to Seer Technologies, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1997, File No. 000-26194).
10.18AAddendum #1 to the Lease Agreement for Cary, N.C. offices, dated July 6, 1998 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.58 to Seer Technology Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1998, File No. 000-26194).
10.18BAmendment to Lease Agreement for Cary, N.C. offices, dated January 21, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21A to Level 8's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).

II-7

10.19Lease Agreement for Cary, N.C. offices, dated November 7, 2003, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Regency Park Corporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 to Level 8’s Form 10-K, filed March 31, 2004).
10.20Office Lease Agreement, dated April 25, 1996, between Template Software, Inc. and Vintage Park Two Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Template Software, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-17063).
10.20AAmendment to Office Lease Agreement, dated August 18, 1997, between Template Software, Inc. and Vintage Park Two Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Template Software, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 000-21921).
10.20Lease Agreement, dated February 23, 2001, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Carnegie 214 Associates Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to Level 8's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 29, 2001).
14.1Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to exhibit 14.1 to Level 8’s Form 10-K/A, filed March 31, 2004).
16.1Letter from Margolis & Company PC regarding change of accountant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to Level 8’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 6, 2004).
21.1List of subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated by reference to exhibit 21.1 to Cicero’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2007).
Consent of Margolis & Company P.C. (filed herewith).
23.2Consent of Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP **.
_____________________________________
* 10.13 Employment Agreement between John P. Broderick and the Company effective January 1, 2004 (filed herewith).* 10.14 Level 8 Systems Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, as Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Level 8's Registration Statement of Form S-1/A, filed September 22, 2000, File No. 333-44588).* 10.14A Seventh Amendment to Level 8 Systems Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14B to Level 8's Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004).* 10.15 Level 8's February 2, 1995 Non-Qualified Option Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Across Data Systems, Inc.'s (Level 8's predecessor) Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed May 12, 1995, File No. 33-92230).* 10.16 Lease Agreement for Cary, N.C. offices, dated November 7, 2003, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Regency Park Corporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 to Level 8's Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004).). 10.17 Lease Agreement, dated February 23, 2001, between Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Carnegie 214 Associates Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to Level 8's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 29, 2001). 16.1 Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding change of accountant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 to Level 8's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 26, 2003). II-7 21.1 List of subsidiaries of the Company (filed herewith). 23.1 Consent of Margolis & Company LLP (filed herewith). 23.2 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (filed herewith). 23.3 Consent of Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy LLP (included in exhibit 5.1 filed herewith). 24.1 Power of Attorney (included on signature page). * Management contract or compensatory agreement. ITEM 17: UNDERTAKINGS
** To be filed by Amendment to this Registration Statement.


Item 17:
Undertakings

(a) (1) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i) To include any Prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii) To reflect in the Prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in this registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high and of the estimated maximum offering price may be reflected in the form of Prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation“Calculation of Registration Fee"Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

II-8


(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this registration statement or any material change to such information in this registration statement.

(2) That for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered herein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered that remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. II-8

II-9

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Princeton,Farmingdale, State of New Jersey, on May 17, 2004. LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. By: /S/ ANTHONY C. PIZI ------------------------- Anthony C. Pizi Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the persons whose signature appears below appoints and constitutes Anthony C. Pizi and John P. Broderick, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to execute any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to the within registration statement, and to file the same, together with all exhibits thereto and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and such other agencies, offices and persons as may be required by applicable law, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each said attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. April 19, 2007.
CICERO INC.
By:  /s/ John P. Broderick
John P. Broderick
Chief Executive Officer

II-10


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE /S/ ANTHONY C. PIZI
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Mark LandisChairman of the Board and April 19, 2007
Mark Landis
/s/ John P. BroderickChief Executive May 17, 2004 - -----------------------------Officer/Chief Financial OfficerApril 19, 2007
John P. Broderick(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Anthony C. PiziChief Information Officer (Principal Executive Officer) /S/ JOHN P. BRODERICK Chief Financial and Operating Officer May 17, 2004 - ----------------------------- John P. Broderick (Principal Accounting Officer) /S/ NICHOLAS HATALSKI Director May 17, 2004 - ----------------------------- Nicholas Hatalski /S/ BRUCE HASENYAGER Director May 17, 2004 - -----------------------------April 19, 2007
Anthony C. Pizi
/s/ Bruce Hasenyager /S/ KENNETH NEILSEN Director May 17, 2004 - ----------------------------- Kenneth Neilsen /S/ JAY KINGLEY Director May 17, 2004 - -----------------------------April 19, 2007
Bruce Hasenyager
/s/ Jay KingleyDirectorApril 19, 2007
Jay Kingley
/s/ Bruce D. MillerDirectorApril 19, 2007
Bruce D. Miller
/s/ Charles PorcielloDirectorApril 19, 2007
Charles Porciello
/s/ Bruce PercelayDirectorApril 19, 2007
Bruce Percelay
/s/ John W. AthertonDirectorApril 19, 2007
John W. Atherton
II-9