As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 2,September 24, 2009

Registration No. 333 -333-

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Aeroflex Incorporated*
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 3674 11-1974412
(State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification No.)

35 South Service Road
P.O. Box 6022
Plainview, N.Y.  11803
(516) 694-6700
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Leonard Borow
Chief Executive Officer and President
Aeroflex Incorporated
35 South Service Road
P.O. Box 6022
Plainview, N.Y.  11803
(516) 694-6700
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

Gary T. Moomjian, Esq.
Moomjian, Waite, Wactlar & Coleman, LLP
100 Jericho Quadrangle
Jericho, New York 11753
Ph: (516) 937-5900
Fax: (516) 937-5050

 Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effectiveness of this Registration Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are being offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.   x

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

 
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨
 
Accelerated filer ¨
   
Non-accelerated filer   x
 
Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Pursuant to Rule 429 under the Securities Act, the Prospectus contained in this Registration Statement relates to the Registrants’ Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed February 2, 2009 (File No. 333-157075).
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF
SECURITIES TO BE
REGISTERED
AMOUNT TO
BE
REGISTERED
PROPOSED
MAXIMUM
OFFERING
PRICE PER
NOTE
PROPOSED
MAXIMUM
AGGREGATE
OFFERING
PRICE
AMOUNT OF
REGISTRATION
FEE
GuaranteesN/AN/AN/A(1) 

 
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF
SECURITIES TO BE
REGISTERED
 
 
AMOUNT TO
BE
REGISTERED
  
PROPOSED
MAXIMUM
OFFERING
PRICE PER
NOTE (1)
  
PROPOSED
MAXIMUM
AGGREGATE
OFFERING
PRICE
  
AMOUNT OF
REGISTRATION
FEE
 
             
11.75% Senior Notes due February 15, 2015 $225,000,000   100% $225,000,000   (2)
Guarantees *  N/A   N/A   N/A   (3)
(1)Estimated solely for purposes
This Registration Statement has been filed to register VI Technology Inc.'s guarantee of calculating the registration fee requiredsenior notes issued by the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, computed pursuant to Rule 457(f).
(2)An indeterminate amount of securities are being registered hereby to be offered solely for market-making purposes for specified affiliates of the registrant.  Pursuant to Rule 457(q) under the Securities Act, no filing fee is required.
(3)Aeroflex Incorporated. No filing fee is required pursuant to Rule 457(n) under the Securities Act.
*Includes certain subsidiaries of Aeroflex Incorporated identified on the following page.

THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE.

ii

TABLE OF ADDITIONAL SUBSIDIARY GUARANTOR REGISTRANTS

Name of Additional Registrant 
State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or
Organization
 
Primary Standard
Industry
Classification Number
 
I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.
Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. (1) Delaware 3674 84-0822182
Aeroflex High Speed Test Solutions, Inc. (2) Ohio 3674 26-2570692
Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. (3) Michigan 3674 38-3178661
Aeroflex/KDI, Inc. (4) Michigan 3674 38-3283270
Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. (5) California 3674 94-2532962
Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc. (6) Michigan 3674 86-1079255
Aeroflex Plainview, Inc. (2) Delaware 3674 11-2774706
Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc. (7) Michigan 3674 38-3260794
Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. (8) Delaware 3674 48-0777904
Aeroflex Bloomingdale, Inc. (2) New York 3674 11-1735010
Aeroflex International Inc. (2)Delaware367466-0361729
Aeroflex Properties Corp. (2) New York 3674 11-3567221
AIF Corp. (2) Delaware 3674 80-0301369
Comar Products Inc. (2) New Jersey 3674 22-1428789
IFR Finance, Inc. (8) Kansas 3674 48-1197644
IFR Systems, Inc. (8) Delaware 3674 48-1197645
MCE Asia, Inc. (6) Michigan 3674 38-3601102
MicroMetrics, Inc. (9) New Hampshire 367402-0404118
VI Technology, Inc. (10)Texas 3674 02-0404118
74-2604744

The address and telephone number of the principal executive offices of each of the additional subsidiary co-registrants are as follows:
(1)4350 Centennial Blvd., Colorado Springs, CO 80907, (719) 594-8000.
(2)35 South Service Road, Plainview, NY 11803, (516) 694-6700.
(3)300 Dino Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, (734) 426-5553.
(4)60 South Jefferson Road, Whippany, NJ 07981, (973) 887-5700.
(5)975 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, (408) 737-8181.
(6)310 Dino Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, (734) 426-1230.
(7)5305 Spectrum Drive, Frederick, MD 21703, (301) 846-9222.
(8)10200 West York Street, Wichita, KS 67215, (316) 522-4981.
(9)54 Grenier Field Road, Londonderry, NH 03052, (603) 641-3800.
(10)3700 W. Parmer Lane, Austin Texas 78727, (512) 327-4400

 
ii
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Registration Statement is being filed to register the guarantee of VI Technology Inc. related to the 11.75% senior notes due February 15, 2015 issued by Aeroflex Incorporated and guarantees issued by the additional subsidiary guarantor registrants listed in the table above previously registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the registration statement bearing the File No. 333-­157075 (the "initial registration statement"). Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 429 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, upon effectiveness, this Registration Statement containing a combined Prospectus shall act as a post-effective amendment to the initial registration statement.

This Registration Statement is being filed, and the Prospectus that is part hereof will be used, solely in connection with offers and sales by Goldman, Sachs & Co. related to market-making transactions. We will not receive any proceeds of such sales.
iii
 
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED FEBRUARY 2,SEPTEMBER 24, 2009

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed.  These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective.  This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any state or jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

AEROFLEX INCORPORATED

$225,000,000 11.75% Senior Notes due February 15, 2015

On August 7, 2008, we issued 11.75% senior notes due February 15, 2015 (the “Original Notes”) in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  As part of the issuance of the Original Notes, holders of the Original Notes were granted benefits pursuant to an exchange and registration rights agreement (the “registration rights agreement”) among us, the initial purchaser and others.  To satisfy our obligations under the registration rights agreement, the Original Notes are currently subject to an exchange offer (the “exchange offer”) which commenced on  January 22,in March 2009 pursuant to which holders of Original Notes have the right to exchange the Original Notes for ourwe issued registered 11.75% senior notes due February 15, 2015 (the “New Notes”“Notes”) with substantially identical terms.  Theterms in exchange offer terminates on March 6, 2009, unless extended. The term “Notes,” as used in this prospectus, includes bothfor all of the Original Notes and New Notes issued inpursuant to an exchange for the Original Notes in the exchange offer.offer (the “exchange offer”).

We pay interest on the Notes on February 15 and August 15 of each year.  Interest accrues at a rate of 11.75% per annum.  It is anticipated that an interest payment will be made on the Original Notes on February 15, 2009, and the New Notes issued in the exchange offer will bear interest commencing February 16, 2009.  Accordingly, holders of the Original Notes who exchange for New Notes will be paid interest on a continuous basis from August 7, 2008, the date of original issuance.

The Notes mature on February 15, 2015.  We have the option to redeem all or part of the Notes at any time on or after August 15, 2011 at the redemption prices set forth in this prospectus.  In addition, at any time prior to August 15, 2010, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes with the proceeds of certain sales of equity securities at 111.75% of the principal amount redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.  In addition, at any time prior to August 15, 2011, we may redeem all or part of the Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus the "make-whole" redemption price described in this prospectus.  If we undergo certain changes of control, each holder of the Notes may require us to repurchase all or a part of that holder’s Notes at a price of 101% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of ours and the guarantors and rank equally with all of our and the guarantors' existing and future senior debt and senior to all of our and the guarantors' existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The Notes and the guarantees are effectively subordinated to all of our and the guarantors' secured debt, including borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness.

The Notes are guaranteed by our existing and future domestic, wholly-owned subsidiaries that guarantee certain of our other indebtedness.  Our foreign subsidiaries do not guarantee the Notes.

There is no existing public market for the Notes offered hereby.  We do not intend to list the Notes on any securities exchange or seek approval for quotation through any automated trading system.

You should carefully consider the "Risk Factors" beginning on page 98 of this prospectus before purchasing the Notes.

These securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state securities commission nor has the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state securities commission passed on the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 
iv
 

This prospectus has been prepared for and will be used by Goldman, Sachs & Co. and other affiliates of Goldman, Sachs & Co. in connection with the offers and sales of the Notes in market-making transactions effected from time to time. These transactions may occur in the open market or may be privately negotiated at prices related to prevailing market prices at the time of sales or at negotiated prices.  Goldman, Sachs & Co. and its affiliates may act as principal or agent in these transactions.  We will not receive any proceeds of such sales.

Goldman, Sachs & Co.

The date of this prospectus is ___________, 2009

 
v
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Page
Prospectus Summary1
  
Risk Factors98
  
Forward-Looking Statements2221
  
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges2322
  
Use of Proceeds2322
  
Capitalization24
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information2422
  
Selected Historical Financial Data3023
  
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations3528
  
Business5244
  
Management6860
  
Executive Compensation7163
  
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management8174
  
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions8275
  
Description of Other Indebtedness8477
  
Description of the Notes8679
  
Book-Entry, Delivery and Form133127
  
Certain U.S. Federal Income and Estate Tax Consequences136129
  
Plan of Distribution139133
  
Certain ERISA Considerations140134
  
Legal Matters140134
  
Experts140134
  
Where You Can Find More Information140134
  
Index to Financial StatementsF-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus.  We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information.  Goldman, Sachs & Co. is not making an offer of any of these securities in any state or jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.  You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front cover of this prospectus.

vi

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights important information about our business and about this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information that may be important to you. You should carefully read this prospectus in its entirety before making an investment decision. In particular, you should read the section titled "Risk Factors" and the financial statements and notes related to those statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In this prospectus, unless the context requires otherwise, references to (i) "we," "our," "the Company," “the issuer”  or "us" refer, as applicable, to Aeroflex Incorporated and  its subsidiaries, (ii) the term "parent" refers to AX Holding Corp., which owns 100% of our capital stock, (iii) the term "parent LLC" refers to VGG Holding LLC, which owns 100% of the parent, (iv) the term "Veritas Capital" refers to The Veritas Capital Fund III, L.P., (v) the term "Golden Gate" refers to Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc., (vi) the term “GS Direct” refers to GS Direct, L.L.C., (vii) the term “Sponsors” refers collectively to affiliates of or funds managed by Veritas Capital, Golden Gate and GS Direct, and to  affiliates of and funds managed by these entities, and (viii) any “fiscal” year refers to the twelve months ended June 30 of the applicable year. For example, “fiscal 2008”2009” refers to our fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.2009.
 
Our common stock was publicly traded on Nasdaq and we filed periodic and other reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, until August 2007.  On August 15, 2007, we were acquired by our parent pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger, or the merger agreement. As a result of this acquisition, which we refer to as the Acquisition, we became a private company and our SEC filing obligations terminated.  As of January 21, 2009, the date of effectiveness of our Registration Statement relating to our exchange offer of New Notes for Original Notes,offering, we again became subject to SEC public reporting requirements.
 
We issued the Original Notes on August 7, 2008 to Goldman, Sachs & Co. (the “Initial Purchaser”) in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The Initial Purchaser of the Original Notes subsequently resold the Original Notes to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A and to persons outside the United States in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act.  As part of the issuance of the Original Notes, holders of the Original Notes were granted benefits pursuant to the registration rights agreement between us and the Initial Purchaser.  The registration rights agreement obligated us to file a registration statement in connection with the exchange offer of New Notes for Original Notes.  The registration statement was declared effective on January 21, 2009 and the exchange offer commenced on January 22, 2009.  The exchange offer terminates on March 6, 2009, unless extended.  As previously described, the term ”Notes” as used in this prospectus includes bothAll of the Original Notes and New Notes issued in exchangewere exchanged for the Original Notes in the exchange offer.offer which terminated on March 6, 2009.
 
Because we are an affiliate of the Initial Purchaser, the registration rights agreement also obligated us to make a current “market-maker” prospectus, such as this prospectus, generally available to the Initial Purchaser and its affiliates to engage in market-making activities for the Notes. The Initial Purchaser advised us that they presently intend to make a market in the Notes as permitted by applicable law and this prospectus is being delivered in accordance therewith.
 
As used in this prospectus, we refer to the “Transactions” collectively as (i) the consummation of the Acquisition, (ii) the borrowings entered into in connection with the Acquisition and the application of the proceeds therefrom, and (iii) the equity investments by the Sponsors and certain members of our management.

Use of  Non-GAAP Measures

We have included certain non-GAAP financial measures in this prospectus, including income (loss) from continuing operations before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and Adjusted EBITDA (as defined herein). We believe that the presentation of EBITDA enhances an investor’s understanding of our financial performance.  We use EBITDA for business planning purposes, including to establish budgets and operational goals and manage our business, and in measuring our performance relative to that of our competitors and we use Adjusted EBITDA to determine compliance with certain debt covenants in our Senior Secured Credit Facility debt agreement. We also believe that EBITDA will provide investors with a useful financial metric for assessing the comparability of our operating performance between periods and our ability to generate cash from operations sufficient to pay taxes, to service debt and to undertake capital expenditures because, among other items, it eliminates the significant amortization expense arising from acquired intangible assets established as a part of purchase accounting as a result of the Acquisition.

Adjusted EBITDA is the basis for the calculation of certain covenants in the indentures governing our senior secured credit facilities. We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are measures commonly used by investors to evaluate our performance and, in the case of EBITDA, to evaluate the performance of our competitors. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not presentations made in accordance with U.S. GAAP and our use of the terms EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA varies from others in our industry.  EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other performance measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP as measures of operating performance or operating cash flows as measures of liquidity.

 
1
 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have important limitations as analytical tools and you should not consider them in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP.  For example, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

 ·excludeexcludes certain tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;
 ·dodoes not reflect any cash,consider capital expenditure requirements for the assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future;
 ·are impacted by reorganization of businesses and other restructuring related charges;
·dodoes not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; and
 ·dodoes not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt.

In calculating Adjusted EBITDA, we add back certain non-cash, non-recurring and other items that are included in EBITDA and/or net income (loss) as required by various covenants in the indenture governing our senior secured credit facilities.  For instance, Adjusted EBITDA:

 ·does not include share-based employee compensation expense, goodwill impairment charges and other non-cash charges;
 ·does not include restructuring, severance and relocation costs incurred to realize future cost savings and enhance our operations;
 ·does not include the impact of Acquisitionbusiness acquisition purchase accounting adjustments; and
 ·does not reflect Company Sale Transaction expenses and merger related expenses, including advisory fees that are being paid  to the Sponsors (as defined below) following the consummation of the Acquisition.  See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”Transactions”; and
·includes other adjustments required in calculating our debt covenant compliance such as  pro forma Adjusted EBITDA for companies acquired during the year.

Our Business

We are a leading provider of highly specialized microelectronics and test and measurement equipment, primarily to the global aerospace and defense and broadband communications markets. We also design application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, for CT scan equipment for the medical industry. Founded in 1937, we have developed a substantial intellectual property portfolio that includes more than 150 patents, extensive know-how, years of collaborative research and development with our customers and a demonstrated history in space.
 
Our business is characterized by the breadth and diversity of our product offerings, customer base, applications and end markets. We believe that we currently have significant market positions in the following product categories in which we compete:  (i) radiation hardened, or RadHard, “fabless” semiconductors, (ii) high performance mixed-signal ASICs, (iii) military radio test equipment and (iv) avionics test equipment. We offer a broad array of products, including custom and standard integrated circuits, or ICs, such as databuses, transceivers, microcontrollers and microprocessors, globally to a diverse group of high quality customers. We often design and develop applications through a collaborative process whereby we provide platform-specific and customized, or “spec’d,” products to our customers.
 
Headquartered in Plainview, New York, we conduct our operations from 1618 facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and China and Sweden and employ more than 2,625approximately 2,700 employees as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009.

Corporate Information

We are a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located at 35 South Service Road, Plainview, NY 11803, our telephone number is (516) 694-6700 and our website is located at www.aeroflex.com. The contents of our website are not part of this prospectus.

 
2
 

Summary Terms of Notes

The summary below describes the principal terms of the registered 11.75% senior notes due February 15, 2015. Certain of the terms and conditions described below are subject to important limitations and exceptions.

IssuerAeroflex Incorporated
  
Notes Offered$225.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11.75% senior notes due February 15, 2015.  The form and terms of the Notes are currently subject to an exchange offer.
  
Maturity DateFebruary 15, 2015.
  
Interest Payment Dates
The Notes bear cash interest at the rate of 11.75% per annum (computed on the basis of a 360-day year), payable semi-annually in arrears.
  
 Payment frequency: every six months on February 15 and August 15 to holders of record on February 1 and August 1, respectively.
It is anticipated that an interest payment will be made on the Original Notes on February 15, 2009 and the New Notes issued in the exchange offer will bear interest from February 16, 2009.  Accordingly, holders of Original Notes who exchange for New Notes will be paid interest on a continuous basis from August 7, 2008, the date of original issuance.
  
GuaranteesOur obligations under the Notes are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by the guarantors and by each of our future domestic subsidiaries.
  
RankingThe Notes are unsecured senior obligations of ours and the guarantors and rank equally with all of our and the guarantors' existing and future senior debt and senior to all of our and the guarantors' existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The Notes and the guarantees are effectively subordinated to all of our and the guarantors' secured debt, including borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness.
  
Optional RedemptionWe may, at our option, redeem all or part of the Notes at any time on or after August 15, 2011 at the redemption prices listed under "Description of Notes—Optional Redemption."
  
 Prior to August 15, 2010, we may, at our option, redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Notes with the proceeds of certain sales of equity securities at 111.75% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. See "Description of Notes—Optional Redemption."
  
 Prior to August 15, 2011, we may, at our option, redeem all or part of the Notes at 100% of the principal amount plus the "make-whole" redemption priceapplicable premium as set forth under "Description of Notes—Optional Redemption.
  
Mandatory Repurchase OfferUpon the occurrence of a change of control (as described under "Description of Notes—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control"), we must offer to repurchase the Notes at 101% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.
  
Certain CovenantsThe Indenture governing the Notes contains certain covenants limiting our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to, under certain circumstances:
  
 ·incur additional debt;
 ·pay dividends or make other distributions on, redeem or repurchase, capital stock;
3

 ·make investments or other restricted payments;
 ·enter into transactions with affiliates;
 ·issue stock of restricted subsidiaries;
 ·sell all, or substantially all, of our assets;
 ·create liens on assets to secure debt; or
 ·effect a consolidation or merger.
   
 These covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications as described in this prospectus under the caption "Description of Notes—Certain Covenants."
  
Risk FactorsYou should carefully consider the information set forth under the caption "Risk Factors" beginning on page 98 of this prospectus.

 
43
 

Summary Historical Financial Data

The following table sets forth our summary historical financial and other operating data. The summary historical financial data presented below for the yearsyear ended June 30, 2006 and  2007, and the periods from July 1, 2007 through August 14, 2007 and August 15, 2007 through June 30, 2008 and the year ended June 30, 2009 has been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.  The summary consolidated financial information for the three month period ended September 30, 2008 has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements for that period, and except as described in the notes thereto, has been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited financial statements, and in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of that information for such period.  As part of the Acquisition, we entered into the various financing arrangements described herein and, as a result, we now have a different capital structure.structure than that which existed prior to the Acquisition.  Accordingly, the results of operations for periods subsequent to the consummation of the Acquisition and related financing transactions will not necessarily be comparable to prior periods.

The selected consolidatedsummary historical financial data below should be read in conjunction with “Use of Proceeds,” “Capitalization,” “Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information,” “Selected Historical Financial Data,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 
54
 

 Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
            
 Predecessor  Successor  Successor     Period  Period    
       Period  Period        August 15,  July 1,    
       July 1,  August 15,        2007  2007    
       2007  2007  Three Months  Year Ended  through  through  Year Ended 
    through  through  Ended  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30, 
 Years Ended June 30,  August 14,  June 30,  September 30,  2009  2008  2007  2007 
 2006  2007  2007  2008  2008  (In thousands) 
 (In thousands)             
Operations Statement Data:                           
Net sales $546,243  $593,146  $38,221  $604,991  $140,845  $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 
Cost of sales  284,312   308,969   22,861   352,953   73,486   314,231   352,953   22,861   308,969 
Gross Profit  261,931   284,177   15,360   252,038   67,359   285,105   252,038   15,360   284,177 
Selling, general and administrative costs  122,871   129,621   19,031   121,086   31,484   128,356   121,086   19,031   129,621 
Research and development costs  72,055   76,717   12,178   69,898   17,029   70,106   69,898   12,178   76,717 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  13,778   13,006   1,692   73,076   17,968   62,962   73,076   1,692   13,006 
Acquired in-process research and development  -   -   -   24,975   - 
Acquired in-process research and development costs  1,665   24,975   -   - 
Company Sale Transaction expenses  -   30,584   3,717   32,493   -   -   32,493   3,717   30,584 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  41,225   -   -   - 
Operating income (loss)  53,227   34,249   (21,258)  (69,490)  878   (19,209)  (69,490)  (21,258)  34,249 
Other income (expense)                                    
Interest expense  (608)  (672)  (275)  (74,658)  (21,215)  (83,823)  (74,658)  (275)  (672)
Other income (expense)  1,669   152   294   4,617   3,086 
Other income (expense), net  11,012   4,617   294   152 
Total other income (expense)  1,061   (520)  19   (70,041)  (18,129)  (72,811)  (70,041)  19   (520)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  54,288   33,729   (21,239)  (139,531)  (17,251)  (92,020)  (139,531)  (21,239)  33,729 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  20,540   24,935   (6,831)  (38,927)  (10,354)  (15,332)  (38,927)  (6,831)  24,935 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  33,748   8,794   (14,408)  (100,604)  (6,897)  (76,688)  (100,604)  (14,408)  8,794 
Discontinued operations, net  (5,652)  (3,868)  (2,508)  (4,821)  - 
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net  (1,137)  -   -   -   - 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes  -   (4,821)  (2,508)  (3,868)
                                    
Net income (loss) $26,959  $4,926  $(16,916) $(105,425) $(6,897) $(76,688) $(105,425) $(16,916) $4,926 

We have not presented earnings (loss) per share data because all 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 20082009 and SeptemberJune 30, 2008 are held by one shareholder.

 
65
 

 Predecessor  Successor  Successor  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
 Years Ended June 30,  
Period
July 1,
2007
through
August 14,
  
Period
August 15,
2007
through
June 30,
  
 
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
             
 2006  2007  2007  2008  2008     Period  Period    
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):               
    August 15,  July 1,    
    2007  2007    
 Year Ended  through  through  Year Ended 
 June 30,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30, 
 2009  2008  2007  2007 
 (In thousands, except ratios) 
            
Balance Sheet Data            
(at end of period):            
Cash and cash equivalents $10,387  $13,000  $45,496  $54,149  $73,066  $57,748  $54,149  $45,496  $13,000 
Marketable securities (including non-current portion)  28,332   9,500   -       19,960   18,755   17,677   19,960   -   9,500 
Working capital(1)  199,780   201,603  $218,072   220,855   216,178 
Working capital (1)  221,406   220,855   218,072   201,603 
Total assets  633,391   674,936   682,776   1,478,999   1,421,929   1,361,597   1,478,999   682,776   674,396 
Long-term debt (including current portion)  4,165   3,583   3,554   878,811   881,383   889,348   878,811   3,554   3,583 
Stockholders’ equity  487,670   510,697   506,626   276,648   245,932 
Stockholder's equity  159,760   276,648   506,622   510,697 
Cash Flow Data:                                    
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities  36,697   20,802   11,293  $8,910   28,510   54,457   8,910   11,293   20,802 
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities  (42,553)  (19,113)  8,406   (1,162,376)  (3,341)  (36,213)  (1,162,376)  8,406   (19,113)
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities  3,748   (793)  12,619   1,209,045   (1,756)  (5,914)  1,209,045   12,619   (793)
Other Financial Data:                                    
Depreciation and amortization  30,371   30,142   3,662   93,032   23,497   84,426   93,032   3,662   30,142 
Capital expenditures  15,365   18,427   1,088   13,179   3,343   18,717   13,179   1,088   18,427 
EBITDA (unaudited) (2)  85,267   64,543   (17,302)  28,159   27,461   76,229   28,159   (17,302)  64,543 
Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited)(3)                   29,083 
Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited) (3)  145,340             
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges (4)		  15.4x  9.8x  *   *   *   *   *   *   9.8x
 
*
The deficit of earnings to fixed charges was $21.2$92.0 million for the period July 1, 2007 through August 14, 2007,year ended June 30, 2009, $139.5 million for the period August 15, 2007 through June 30, 2008 and $17.3$21.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
period July 1, 2007 through August 14, 2007.
 
(1)Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.
 
(2)As used herein, “EBITDA” represents income (loss) from continuing operations plus (i) interest expense, (ii) provision for income taxes and (iii) depreciation and amortization.
 
7

We have included information concerning EBITDA in this prospectus because we believe that such information is used by certain investors, securities analysts and others as one measure of an issuer’s performance and historical ability to service debt. In addition, we use EBITDA when interpreting operating trends and results of operations of our business. EBITDA is also widely used by us and others in our industry to evaluate and to price potential acquisition candidates. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, earnings from operations, cash flows from operations or other traditional GAAP indications of an issuer’s operating performance or liquidity.
 
The use of EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider this measure in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.  For additional information regarding our use of EBITDA and limitations on its usefulness as an analytical tool, see “Use of Non-GAAP Measures.”

6
 
The following table is a reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations to EBITDA for the periods indicated:
 
 Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
            
    Period  Period    
    August 15,  July 1,    
    2007  2007    
 Year Ended  through  through  Year Ended 
 Predecessor  Successor  Successor  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30, 
 Years Ended June 30,  
Period
July 1,
2007
through
August 14,
  
Period
August 15,
2007
through
June 30,
  
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
  2009  2008  2007  2007 
 2006  2007  2007  2008  2008  (In thousands) 
 (In thousands)             
Income (loss) from continuing operations $33,748  $8,794  $(14,408) $(100,604) $(6,897) $(76,688) $(100,604) $(14,408) $8,794 
Interest expense  608   672   275   74,658   21,215   83,823   74,658   275   672 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  20,540   24,935   (6,831)  (38,927)  (10,354)  (15,332)  (38,927)  (6,831)  24,935 
Depreciation and amortization  30,371   30,142   3,662   93,032     23,497   84,426   93,032   3,662   30,142 
EBITDA (unaudited) $85,267  $64,543  $(17,302) $28,159  $27,461  $76,229  $28,159  $(17,302) $64,543 

   (3)The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is based on the definitions in our debt agreements and is not defined under U.S. GAAP.  Our use of the term Adjusted EBITDA may vary from others in our industry.  Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of operating income (loss), performance or liquidity under U.S. GAAP and is subject to important limitations.  For additional information regarding our use of Adjusted EBITDA and limitations on its usefulness as an analytical tool, see “Use of Non-GAAP Measures.”  A reconciliation of EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA is as follows:
 
 Year Ended  
 June 30, 2009  
 Three Months Ended     
 September 30, 2008  (Successor Entity)  
 Successor Entity  (In thousands)  
       
EBITDA (unaudited) $27,461  $76,229  
Impact of other non-cash purchase accounting adjustments 97 
Company sale transaction expenses and merger and related costs 634 
Restructuring expenses (a) 402 
     
Non-cash purchase accounting adjustments  2,749  
     
Merger related expenses  4,283  
     
Restructuring costs (a)
  4,102  
     
Share based compensation (b)  489   1,955  
     
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  41,225  
     
Other defined items (c)
  14,797  
     
Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited) $29,083  $145,340  (d)

8

(a)
Primarily reflects costs associated with the reorganization of our U.K. operations.
(b)
Reflects non-cash share-based employee compensation expense under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payments.

 (c)Reflects other adjustments required in calculating our debt covenant compliance such as pro forma Adjusted EBITDA for companies acquired during the year and other non-cash charges.
(d)Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited) for the year ended June 30, 2008 (Predecessor and Successor combined) was $135.1 million.

7

(4)In calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of deferred financing costs and one-third of rent expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factored in those rentals.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this prospectus, you should carefully consider the following factors before deciding to invest in the Notes.  Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such a case, you may lose all or part of your original investment.

Risks Related to the Notes and Our Indebtedness

Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under the Notes.obligations.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we had $881.4$889.3 million of debt outstanding, including approximately $519.8$515.8 million of secured debt under our Senior Secured Credit Facility,senior secured credit facility, $225.0 million of principal amount of senior notes subject to the exchange offeringNotes and $135.2$147.5 million of subordinated unsecured debt under our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility.senior subordinated unsecured credit facility. Additionally, at SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 we were able to borrow an additional $50.0 million under the revolving portion of our Senior Secured Credit Facility.senior secured credit facility.
 
Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to you.consequences. For example, it could:
 
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations, including with respect to the Notes;
 
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
 
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
 
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
 
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and
 
limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
 
In addition, our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility bears interest at variable rates.  At SeptemberAs of June 30, 2008,2009, we had approximately $520$515.8 million outstanding under the term-loan portion of variable rate indebtedness under our senior secured credit facility.  Afacility, the un-hedged portion which is subject to variable interest rates. Each change of 1% increase in suchinterest rates would increaseresult in a $584,000 change in our annual interest expense by approximately $5.2 million.on the un-hedged portion of the term-loan borrowings.
 
Despite current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the Indenture governing the Notes and our Senior Secured Credit Facility and our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitydebt allow us to incur substantial amounts of additional debt, subject to certain limitations. The revolving portion of our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility permits borrowing of up to $50.0 million thereunder, and these borrowings would be effectively senior to the Notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.  If new indebtedness is added to our and our subsidiaries' current debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face would intensify.

9

To service our indebtedness and other obligations, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.
 
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness including the Notes, and to fund working capital needs and planned capital expenditures, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future.  This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control.

8
 
Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available to us under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility or otherwise in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness including the Notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness including the Notes, on or before the maturity thereof. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness including our Senior Secured Credit Facility, the Notes or our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
 
In addition, if for any reason we are unable to meet our debt service obligations, we would be in default under the terms of our agreements governing our outstanding debt. If such a default were to occur, the lenders under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility immediately due and payable, and the lenders would not be obligated to continue to advance funds to us. In addition, if such a default were to occur, the Notes and/or any amounts then outstanding under our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility or subordinated unsecured notes would become immediately due and payable. If the amounts outstanding under these debt agreements are accelerated, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full the money owed to our debt holders, including holders of the Notes.
 
Your right to receive payments on the Notes is effectively subordinated to the rights of our and the guarantors’ existing and future secured creditors.
 
Holders of our secured indebtedness and the secured indebtedness of the guarantors of our indebtedness will have claims that are prior to yourthe claims asof the holders of the Notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing that other indebtedness. Notably, we and our subsidiaries, including the guarantors, are parties to our Senior Secured Credit Facility,senior secured credit facility, which is secured by liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of the guarantors and a pledge of all of our capital stock and all of the capital stock of our domestic subsidiaries. The Notes will beare effectively subordinated to all of our secured indebtedness. In the event of any distribution or payment of our assets or any pledged capital stock in any foreclosure, dissolution, winding-up, liquidation, reorganization or other bankruptcy proceeding, holders of secured indebtedness will have prior claims to those of our assets and any pledged capital stock that constitute their collateral. Holders of the Notes will participate ratably with all other holders of our unsecured indebtedness that is deemed to be of the same class as the Notes and potentially with all of our other general creditors, based upon the respective amounts owed to each holder or creditor, in our remaining assets. In any of the foregoing events, there may not be sufficient assets to pay amounts due on the Notes. As a result, holders of the Notes may receive less, ratably, than holders of secured indebtedness.
 
If we default on our obligations to pay our other indebtedness, we may not be able to make payments on the Notes.
 
Any default under the agreements governing our indebtedness, including a default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility or our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility that is not waived by the required lenders, and the remedies sought by the holders of such indebtedness, could make us unable to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes and substantially decrease the market value of the Notes. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow and are otherwise unable to obtain funds necessary to meet required payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness, or if we otherwise fail to comply with the various covenants, including financial and operating covenants, in the instruments governing our indebtedness (including our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility and our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility)senior subordinated unsecured credit facility), we could be in default under the terms of the agreements governing such indebtedness. In the event of such default, the holders of such indebtedness could elect to declare all the funds borrowed thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, the lenders under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility could elect to terminate their commitments, cease making further loans and institute foreclosure proceedings against our assets, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. If our operating performance declines, we may in the future need to seek to obtain waivers from the required lenders under our Senior Secured Credit Facility,senior secured credit facility, our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility or other debt that we may incur in the future to avoid being in default. If we breach our covenants under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility or our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility and seek a waiver, we may not be able to obtain a waiver from the required lenders. If this occurs, we would be in default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility and/or our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility,senior subordinated unsecured credit facility, the lenders could exercise their rights as described above, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. If we are unable to repay debt, lenders having secured obligations, such as the lenders under our Senior Secured Credit Facility,senior secured credit facility, could proceed against the collateral securing the debt. Because the Indenture governing the Notes, our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility and our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility have customary cross-default provisions, if the indebtedness under the Notes, our Senior Secured Credit Facility,senior secured credit facility, our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility, or any of our other debt is accelerated, we may be unable to repay or finance the amounts due.  See “Description of Other Indebtedness” and “Description of the Notes.”

 
109
 

The Indenture governing the Notes, our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility and our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility will impose significant operating and financial restrictions, which may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and taking some actions.
 
The Indenture governing the Notes, our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility and our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility and contain customary restrictions on our activities, including covenants that restrict us and our restricted subsidiaries from:
 
incurring additional indebtedness and issuing disqualified stock or preferred stock;
 
making certain investments or other restricted payments;
 
paying dividends and making other distributions with respect to capital stock, or repurchasing, redeeming or retiring capital stock or subordinated debt;
 
selling or otherwise disposing of our assets;
 
creating liens on our assets;
 
consolidating or merging with, or acquiring, another business, or selling or disposing of all or substantially all of our assets; and
 
entering into transactions with our affiliates.
 
The restrictions in the Indenture governing the Notes, our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility and our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility and may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business, and may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. We also may incur future debt obligations that might subject us to additional restrictive covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility. We may not be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if for any reason we are unable to comply with these agreements, and we may not be able to refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us, or at all. The breach of any of these covenants and restrictions could result in a default under the Indenture governing the Notes, under our Senior Secured Credit Facility or undersenior secured credit facility and our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility.senior subordinated unsecured credit facility. An event of default under our debt agreements would permit some of our lenders to declare all amounts borrowed from them to be due and payable.

10
 
We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to finance any change of control offer required by the Indenture governing the Notes.
 
Upon the occurrence of certain kinds of change of control events, we will be required to offer to repurchase outstanding Notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. However, it is possible that we will not have sufficient funds at the time of the change of control to make the required repurchase of the Notes or that restrictions in our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility will not allow such repurchases. Our failure to purchase the tendered Notes would constitute an event of default under the Indenture governing the Notes which, in turn, would constitute a default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility and, if the lenders accelerate the debt under our Senior Secured Credit Facility,senior secured credit facility, a default under our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility.senior subordinated unsecured credit facility. In addition, the occurrence of a change of control would also constitute an event of default under our Senior Secured Credit Facility.senior secured credit facility. A default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility would result in a default under the Indenture and under our Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility,senior subordinated unsecured credit facility, if the lenders accelerate the debt under our Senior Secured Credit Facility.senior secured credit facility.
 
Moreover, our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility restricts, and any future indebtedness we incur may restrict, our ability to repurchase the Notes, including following a change of control event. As a result, following a change of control event, we would not be able to repurchase the Notes unless we first repay all indebtedness outstanding under our Senior Secured Credit Facilitysenior secured credit facility and any of our other indebtedness that contains similar provisions, or obtain a waiver from the holders of such indebtedness to permit us to repurchase the Notes. We may be unable to repay all of that indebtedness or obtain a waiver of that type. Any requirement to offer to repurchase the outstanding Notes may therefore require us to refinance our other outstanding debt, which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. These repurchase requirements may also delay or make it more difficult for others to obtain control of us.
 
11

Federal and state statutes allow courts, under certain specific circumstances, to void guarantees and/or require note holders to return payments received from guarantors.
 
Under current federal bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer or fraudulent conveyance laws, a guarantee may be voided or cancelled, or claims in respect of a guarantee may be subordinated to all other debts of that guarantor if, among other things, the guarantor, at the time it incurred the indebtedness evidenced by its guarantee:
 
issued the guarantee with the intent to delay, hinder or defraud present or future creditors; or
 
received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for the incurrence of such guarantee; and either
 
was insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of such incurrence; or
 
was engaged, or about to engage, in a business or transaction for which the guarantor’s remaining assets constituted unreasonably small capital; or
 
intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature (as all of the foregoing terms are defined in or interpreted under the fraudulent transfer or conveyance statutes); or
 
was a defendant in an action for money damages, or had a judgment for money damages docketed against it (if, in either case, after final judgment the judgment is unsatisfied).
 
In addition, any payment by that guarantor pursuant to its guarantee could be voided and required to be returned to the guarantor, or to a fund for the benefit of the creditors of the guarantor.
 
A court likely would find that a guarantor did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in exchange for its guarantee if the value received by the guarantor were found to be disproportionately small when compared with its obligations under the guarantee or, put differently, it did not benefit, directly or indirectly, from the issuance of the Notes. The measures of insolvency for purposes of fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws will vary depending upon the particular law applied in any proceeding to determine whether a fraudulent transfer or conveyance has occurred. Generally, however, a guarantor would be considered insolvent if:
 
the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, was greater than the fair saleable value of all of its assets; or
11
 
if the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or
 
it could not pay its debts as they become due.
 
On the basis of historical financial information, recent operating history and other factors, we believe that each guarantor, after giving effect to its guarantee of the Notes, will not be insolvent, will not have unreasonably small capital for the business in which it is engaged and will not have incurred debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature. We cannot assure you, however, as to what standard a court would apply in making these determinations or that a court would agree with our conclusions in this regard.
 
The Notes are structurally subordinated to all obligations of our non-guarantor subsidiaries.
 
The Notes are not guaranteed by any of our current or future foreign subsidiaries. As a result of this structure, the Notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations, including trade payables, of our non-guarantor subsidiaries. The effect of this subordination is that, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or similar proceeding involving a non-guarantor subsidiary, the assets of that subsidiary cannot be used to pay youthe holders of the Notes until all other claims against that subsidiary, including trade payables, have been fully paid. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, the aggregate total assets (based on book value) of our non-guarantor subsidiaries were $259$241 million, representing approximately 18% of our total assets. In addition, 24%23% of our total liabilities were attributable to our non-guarantor subsidiaries as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009.  For fiscal 2008, 30%2009, 29% of our net sales was attributable to our non-guarantor subsidiaries. For fiscal 2008,2009, our non-guarantor subsidiaries had a lossincome from continuing operations of $14.1$17.8 million.
 
12

Our controlling equity holders may take actions that conflict with your interests.the interests of the holders of our debt.
 
Substantially all of the voting power of our equity is held by the Sponsors. Accordingly, they control the power to elect our directors and officers, to appoint new management and to approve all actions requiring the approval of the holders of our equity, including adopting amendments to our constituent documents and approving mergers, acquisitions or sales of all or substantially all of our assets. The directors have the authority, subject to the terms of our debt, to issue additional indebtedness or equity, implement equity repurchase programs, declare dividends and make other such decisions about our equity.
 
In addition, the interests of our controlling equity holders could conflict with your interests.the interests of the holders of our debt. For example, if we encounter financial difficulties or are unable to pay our debts as they mature, the interests of our controlling equity holders might conflict with yourthe interests as a Note holder.of our debt holders. Our controlling equity holders also may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, financings or other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their equity investments, even though such transactions might involve risks to you, asthe holders of the Notes.our debt.
 
There is no public market for the Notes, and we do not know if a market will ever develop or, if a market does develop, whether it will be sustained.
 
The Notes are a new issue of securities for which there is no existing trading market.  Accordingly, we cannot assure you that a liquid market will develop for the Notes, that you will be able to sell your notes at a particular time or that the prices that you receive when you sell the Notes will be favorable.
We do not intend to apply for listing or quotation of the Notes on any securities or stock market, although we intendour Notes are eligible to apply to list our Notestrade on the PORTAL Market Trading System.  The liquidity of any market for the Notes will depend on a number of factors, including:
 
•            
the number of holders of Notes;
 
•            
our operating performance and financial condition;
 
•            
the market for similar securities;
 
•            
the interest of securities dealers in making a market in the Notes; and
 
•            
prevailing interest rates.
 
12

The Notes were issued to, and we believe the Notes are owned by, a relatively small number of beneficial owners.  Goldman, Sachs & Co., or the Initial Purchaser, was the initial purchaser of the Notes pursuant to a purchase agreement among us, the guarantors and Goldman, Sachs & Co., dated August 7, 2008.  The Initial Purchaser advised us that they presently intend to makemakes a market in the Notes as permitted by applicable law.  However, the Initial Purchaser is under no obligation to do so and may cease their market-making at any time without notice.  Accordingly, the market for the Notes may cease to exist.  Because we are an affiliate of the Initial Purchaser, the Initial Purchaser is required to deliver a current “market-maker” prospectus, such as this prospectus, and otherwise comply with the registration requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any secondary market sale of the Notes, which may affect their ability to continue market-making activities. By way of this prospectus, we are making a “market-maker” prospectus generally available to the Initial Purchaser to permit it to engage in market-making transactions. However, the exchange and registration rights agreement, dated August 7, 2008, among us, the guarantors and Goldman, Sachs & Co. provides that we may, for valid business reasons, allow the market-maker prospectus to cease to be effective and usable for a period of time as set forth in the exchange and registration rights agreement or as otherwise acceptable to the market-maker. As a result, the liquidity of the secondary market for the Notes may be materially adversely affected by the unavailability of a current “market-maker” prospectus.
 
13

Risks Relating to Our Business
 
A global recession and continued credit tightening could adversely affect us.
 
Current concerns about aThe current global recession and continued credit tightening, including failures of financial institutions, have initiated unprecedented government intervention in the U.S., Europe and other regions of the world.  To some extent, our sales have been adversely affected.  If these concerns continue or worsen, our customers could experience financial difficulties and as a result modify, delay or cancel plans to purchase our products or services or become unable to make payment to us for amounts due and owing. In addition, our suppliers could experience credit or other financial difficulties that could result in delays in their ability to supply us with necessary raw materials, components or finished products. These conditions may make it extremely difficult for our customers, our suppliers and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities and could result in an asset impairment.  The occurrence of anyany of these factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  For example, in the fourth quarter of 2009 we wrote-off approximately $41.2 million of goodwill and other intangible assets related to our RFMW reporting unit.
 
Instability in financial markets could adversely affect our ability to access capital markets.

In recent months,years, the volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets have reached unprecedented levels.  If these conditions continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience a material adverse effect on our ability to borrow money, including under our Senior Secured Credit Facility,senior secured credit facility, or have access to capital, if needed.  Although our lenders have made commitments to make funds available to us in a timely fashion, our lenders may be unable or unwilling to lend money.  In addition, if we determine that it is appropriate or necessary to raise capital in the future, the future cost of raising funds through the debt or equity markets may be more expensive or those markets may be unavailable.  If we were unable to raise funds through debt or equity markets, it could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to implement our business strategy, our future results could be adversely affected.

Our future results of operations will depend in significant part on the extent to which we can implement our business strategy, which depends on our ability to successfully operate each component of our business. Our ability to execute our business strategy is subject to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including those set forth in these “Risk Factors.” If we are unable to successfully implement our strategy, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our industry is highly competitive.

We operate in a highly competitive industry. Current and prospective customers for our products evaluate our capabilities against the merits of our direct competitors. For all of our products, we compete primarily on the basis of both performance and price. Some of our competitors are well-established and have greater market share and manufacturing, financial, research and development and marketing resources than we do. We also compete with emerging companies that are attempting to sell their products in specialized markets, and with the internal capabilities of many of our significant customers, including Honeywell and BAE. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current market share with respect to any of our products. A loss of market share to our competitors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, a significant portion of our contracts, including those with the federal government and commercial customers, are subject to commercial bidding, both upon initial issuance and recompetition. If we are unable to successfully compete in the bidding process or if we fail to obtain renewal, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

13

Dependence on contract fabrication of semiconductors and outsourcing other portions of our business may adversely affect our ability to bring products to market and damage our reputation.

As part of our efforts to minimize the amount of required capital investment in facilities, equipment and labor and increase our ability to quickly respond to changes in technology and customer requirements, we outsource our semiconductor fabrication processes and certain other manufacturing functions to third parties. If these third parties fail to perform their obligations in a timely manner or at satisfactory quality and cost levels, our ability to bring products to market and our reputation could suffer and our costs could increase. For example, during a market upturn, our contract manufacturers may be unable to meet our demand requirements, which may preclude us from fulfilling our customers’ orders on a timely basis. The ability of these manufacturers to perform is largely outside of our control.

Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, and if we cannot continue to develop, manufacture and market innovative products that meet customer requirements for performance and reliability, we may lose market share and our net sales may suffer.

The process of developing new high technology products is complex and uncertain, and failure to keep apace of technological development, to develop or obtain appropriate intellectual property and to anticipate customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends accurately could significantly harm our results of operations. We must make long-term investments and commit significant resources before knowing whether our predictions will eventually result in products that the market will accept. We must accurately forecast volumes, mix of products and configurations that meet customer requirements, and we may not succeed.
 
14

Our intellectual property rights may be inadequate to protect our business.
 
Our patents are of significant importance to us. In addition, we rely on our trademarks, trade secrets, proprietary know-how and concepts. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights, both in the United States and in foreign countries, through a combination of patent, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as third-party nondisclosure and assignment agreements. Because of the differences in foreign trademark, patent and other laws concerning proprietary rights, our intellectual property rights may not receive the same degree of protection in foreign countries as they would in the United States. Our failure to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights for any reason could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We have applied for patent protection relating to certain existing and proposed products, processes and services. While we generally apply for patents in those countries where we intend to make, have made, use or sell patented products, we may not accurately predict all of the countries where patent protection will ultimately be desirable. If we fail to timely file a patent application in any such country, we may be precluded from doing so at a later date. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that any of our patent applications will be approved. We also cannot assure you that the patents issuingissued as a result of our foreign patent applications will have the same scope of coverage as our United States patents. The patents we own could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by others and may not be of sufficient scope or strength to provide us with any meaningful protection or commercial advantage. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe our patents, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our patents.
 
Some of our proprietary technology may have been developed under, or in connection with, U.S. government contracts or other federal funding agreements. With respect to technology developed under such federal funding agreements, the U.S. government may retain a nonexclusive, non-transferable, irrevocable, paid-up license to use the technology on behalf of the United States throughout the world. In addition, the U.S. government may obtain additional rights to such technology, or our ability to exploit such technology may be limited.
 
We rely on our trademarks, trade names and brand names to distinguish our products and services from the products and services of our competitors, and have registered or applied to register many of these trademarks. In the event that our trademarks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to rebrand our products and services, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote resources marketing new brands. Further, we cannot assure you that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.
 
We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology. It is possible that others will independently develop the same or similar technology or otherwise obtain access to our unpatented technology. To protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information, we require employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements. We cannot assure you that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information. If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies, we could be materially adversely affected.

 
14

If third parties claim that we infringe upon or misappropriate their intellectual property rights, our net sales, gross margins and expenses could be adversely affected.
 
We face the risk of claims that we have infringed or misappropriated third parties’ intellectual property rights. Any claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement, even those without merit, could:
 
be expensive and time consuming to defend;
 
cause us to cease making or using products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
 
require us to redesign, reengineer or rebrand our products, if feasible;
 
divert management’s attention and resources; and
 
require us to enter into licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use a third party’s intellectual property.
 
15

Any licensing agreements, if required, may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.  A successful claim of infringement against us could result in our being required to pay significant damages, enter into costly license agreements, or stop the sale of certain products, any of which could adversely affect our net sales, gross margins and expenses and harm our future prospects.
 
Many patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy for a period of time after they are filed, and therefore there is a risk that we could adopt a technology without knowledge of a pending patent application, which technology would infringe a third party patent once that patent is issued.
 
We rely on sales to federal government entities under prime contracts and subcontracts. A loss or reduction of such contracts, a failure to obtain new contracts or a reduction of sales under such contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business.
 
We derived approximately 28%37% of our net sales for fiscal 20082009 from contracts with the federal government and its agencies or subcontracts with prime government contractors. The loss or significant curtailment of any of our significant government contracts or subcontracts, or failure to exercise renewal options or enter into new contracts or subcontracts, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  Continuation and the exercise of renewal options on our existing government contracts and subcontracts and new government contracts and subcontracts are, among other things, contingent upon the availability of adequate funding for the various federal government agencies with which we and prime government contractors do business. Changes in federal government spending could directly affect our financial performance. Among the factors that could impact federal government spending and which would reduce our federal government contracting business are:
 
a significant decline in, or reapportioning of, spending by the federal government;
 
changes, delays or cancellations of federal government programs or requirements;
 
the adoption of new laws or regulations that affect companies that provide services to the federal government;
 
federal government shutdowns or other delays in the government appropriations process;
 
curtailment of the federal government’s use of third-party service firms;
 
changes in the political climate, including with regard to the funding or operation of the services we provide; and
 
general economic conditions.

 
15

While U.S. defense spending has increased significantly in recent years due to greater homeland security and foreign military commitments, these defense spending levels may not be sustainable, particularly with the Iraq-related work. If the newcurrent presidential administration were to reorder its budgetary priorities resulting in a general decline in U.S. defense spending, it could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, exercise their rights to terminate contracts in whole or in part, to issue temporary stop work orders or decline to exercise options to renew contracts, all of which could harm our operations and significantly reduce our future revenues.

Federal government contracts may be terminated by the federal government at any time prior to their completion and contain other unfavorable provisions, which could lead to unexpected loss of sales and reduction in backlog.
 
Under the terms of federal government contracts, the federal government may unilaterally:
 
terminate or modify existing contracts;
 
reduce the value of existing contracts through partial termination;
 
delay the payment of our invoices by government payment offices;
 
audit our contract-related costs; and
 
suspend us from receiving new contracts pending resolution of any alleged violations of procurement laws or regulations.
 
16

The federal government can terminate or modify any of its contracts with us or its prime contractors either for its convenience, or if we or its prime contractors default, by failing to perform under the terms of the applicable contract. A termination arising out of our default could expose us to liability and have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and subcontracts. If the federal government or its prime contractors terminate and/or materially modify any of our contracts or if any applicable options are not exercised, our failure to replace sales generated from such contracts would result in lower sales and could adversely affect our earnings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Our backlog as of SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 was approximately $271$271.9 million, of which approximately 43%49% represented firm contracts with agencies of the U.S. government or prime defense contractors or subcontractors of the U.S. government. There can be no assurance that any of the contracts comprising our backlog will result in actual sales in any particular period or that the actual sales from such contracts will equal our backlog estimates. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any contract included in our estimated backlog that generates sales will be profitable.
 
Our business could be adversely affected by a negative audit or other actions, including suspension or debarment, by the federal government.
 
As a federal government contractor, we must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of government contracts. These laws and regulations affect how we do business with the federal government and our prime government contractors, and in some instances, impose added costs on our business. Federal government agencies routinely audit and investigate government contractors. These agencies review each contractor’s contract performance, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. Such agencies also review the adequacy of, and a contractor’s compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed.
 
In addition, government contract payments received by us for allowable direct and indirect costs are subject to adjustment after audit by government auditors and repayment to the government if the payments exceed allowable costs as defined in the government contracts.
 
As a federal government contractor, we are subject to an increased risk of investigations, criminal prosecution, civil fraud, whistleblower lawsuits and other legal actions and liabilities to which companies with solely commercial customers are not subject, the results of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. If we were suspended or prohibited from contracting with the federal government generally, or any significant federal government agency specifically, if our reputation or relationship with federal government agencies were impaired or if the federal government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

 
16

Our federal government contracts are subject to competitive bidding, both upon initial issuance and recompetition.  If we are unable to successfully compete in the bidding process or if we fail to receive renewal, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
A significant portion of our federal government contracts are awarded through a competitive bidding process, including upon renewal, and we expect that this will continue to be the case. There often is significant competition and pricing pressure as a result of this process.
 
The competitive bidding process presents a number of risks including the following:such as:
 
we must expend substantial funds and time to prepare bids and proposals for contracts, which could detract attention from other parts of our business;
 
we may be unable to estimate accurately the resources and cost that will be required to complete any contract we win, which could result in substantial cost overruns; and
 
we may encounter expense and delay if our competitors protest or challenge awards of contracts to us, and any such protest or challenge could result in a requirement to resubmit bids on modified specifications or in termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract.
 
17

The government contracts for which we compete typically have multiple option periods, and if we fail to win a contract, we generally will be unable to compete again for that contract for several years. If we fail to win new contracts or to receive renewal contracts upon recompetition, such failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Certain of our products may be controlled by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”), which may adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We are subject to International Traffic in Arms Regulation, or ITAR.  ITAR requires export licenses from the U.S. Department of State for products shipped outside the U.S. that have military or strategic applications.  During the quarter ended March 31, 2007,In this connection, we became aware thathave filed certain RadHard bidirectional multipurpose transceivers sold by us since 1999 may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with ITAR. Accordingly, we filed a Voluntary DisclosureDisclosures with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, U.S. Department of State, describing the details of the possible inadvertent misclassification. Simultaneously, we filedviolations.  See “Business – Legal Proceedings.”

The Company is involved in various other ITAR related matters, including some recently identified with the prior practices of a Commodity Jurisdiction request providing detailed information and data supporting our contention that the product is not subject to ITAR and requesting a determination that such product is not ITAR controlled. By letter dated November 15, 2007, we were informed thatrecently acquired business, which may warrant disclosure with the U.S. Department of State had determinedState.  Although we are in responsethe process of addressing these matters, we cannot assure you that we will be able to our Commodity Jurisdiction request, thatadequately correct all possible ITAR violations.  Compliance with the product is subject to the licensing jurisdictiondirectives of the U.S. Department of State may result in accordance with ITAR. We requested reconsiderationsubstantial legal and other expenses and the diversion of this determination. On February 7, 2008, we filed an addendum to the above referenced Voluntary Disclosure advising the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls that other products sold by us similar in nature to the transceiver described above may also be subject to ITAR. The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls agreed to extend our time to file such addendum to the Voluntary Disclosure until a decision was rendered with respect to our request for reconsideration of the determination in connection with the above-referenced Commodity Jurisdiction request. On August 5, 2008, we received a letter from the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (“DTCC”) requesting that we provide documentation and/or information relating to our compliance initiatives after November 15, 2007 as well as the results of any product reviews conducted by us, and indicating that a civil penalty against us could be warranted in connection with this matter following the review of such materials. We have provided all of the materials and documentation requested by the DTCC. Our request for reconsideration was denied by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls on August 19, 2008, which determined that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of State in accordance with ITAR.  Accordingly, on September 18, 2008, we filed an addendum to our Voluntary Disclosure identifying other products that may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with ITAR but were inadvertently misclassified.  At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us, or the materiality of any outcome.
During May 2008, we became further aware that a certain product sold by our KDI subsidiary may have been inadvertently misclassified as not ITAR controlled. On August 5, 2008, we filed a Voluntary Disclosure with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, U.S. Department of State, describing the inadvertent misclassification of this product. At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us, or the materiality of any outcome.
During November 2008, we became aware that our Hauppauge facility had shipped two ITAR controlled products to a foreign customer, but inadvertently had noted on the requisite paperwork that only one ITAR controlled product was included in the shipment.  We intend to file a voluntary disclosure with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, U.S. Department of State, informing them of this mistake.  At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us, or the materiality of any outcome.
During January 2009, we became aware that a certain product sold by our Powell subsidiary, for which an ITAR marketing license had been properly issued by the U.S. Department of State, mistakenly was taken out of the country by an employee without first obtaining the required U.S. Customs signature upon departure.   We intend to file a voluntary disclosure shortly advising the U.S. Department of State of this mistake. At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us, or the materiality of any outcome.

management time.  In the event that a determination is made that we have violated ITAR with respect to any of the foregoing matters, we may be subject to substantial monetary penalties that we are unable to quantify at this time, and/or a suspension or revocation of our export privileges and criminal sanctions, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

18

We are subject to unanticipated market conditions that could adversely affect our available working capital and financial position.
 
We hold investments that consist of certain auction rate securities, or ARS. Beginning in February 2008, auctions for the resale of ARS have ceased to reliably support the liquidity of these securities. We cannot be certain that liquidity will be restored in the foreseeable future or at all. We may not be able to access cash by selling these securities for which there is insufficient demand without a loss of principal until a future auction for these investments is successful, a secondary market emerges, they are redeemed by their issuer or they mature. These securities are classified as non-current assets. In addition, the value of such investments could potentially be impaired on a temporary or other-than-temporary basis. If it is determined that the value of the investment is impaired on an other-than-temporary basis, we would be required to write down the investment to its fair value and record a charge to earnings for the amount of the impairment. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we held ARS with a par value of $19.9 million and a fair value of $18.7$17.7 million.  In July 2009, the issuer redeemed $1 million of the ARS at par.

 
17

Our failure to detect unknown defects in our products could materially harm our relationship with customers, our reputation and our business.
 
Defects could be found in our existing or new products. These defects could result in significant product liability or warranty claims. In addition, any defects found in our products could result in a loss of sales or market share, failure to achieve market acceptance, injury to our reputation, indemnification claims, litigation, increased insurance costs and increased service costs, any of which could discourage customers from purchasing our products and materially harm our business.
 
General economic conditions could adversely affect our net sales, gross margins and expenses.
 
Our net sales and gross margins depend significantly on the overall demand for microelectronic products and testing solutions, in the product and service segments in which we compete. Weaker demand for our products and services caused by economic weakness may result in decreased sales, earnings levels or growth rates and problems with the saleability of inventory and realizability of customer receivables. In the past, we have observed effects of global economic downturns in many areas of our business. Delays or reductions in spending for our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
As part of our business strategy, we may complete acquisitions or divest non-strategic businesses and product lines and undertake restructuring efforts. These actions could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
As part of our business strategy, we engage in discussions with third parties regarding, and enter into agreements relating to, possible acquisitions, ventures and divestitures in order to manage our product and technology portfolios and further our strategic objectives. We also continually look for ways to increase the profitability of our operations through restructuring efforts and to consolidate operations across facilities where synergies exist. In order to pursue this strategy successfully, we must identify suitable acquisition, alliance or divestiture candidates, complete these transactions, some of which may be large and complex, and integrate acquired companies. Integration and other risks of acquisitions can be more pronounced for larger and more complicated transactions, or if multiple acquisitions are pursued simultaneously.
 
The integration of acquisitions may make the completion and integration of subsequent acquisitions more difficult. However, if we fail to identify and complete these transactions, we may be required to expend resources to internally develop products and technology or may be at a competitive disadvantage or may be adversely affected by negative market perceptions, which may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Acquisitions may require us to integrate different company cultures, management teams and business infrastructures and otherwise manage integration risks. Even if an acquisition is successfully integrated, we may not receive the expected benefits of the transaction.
 
A successful sale or divestiture depends on various factors, including our ability to effectively transfer assets and liabilities, contracts, facilities and employees to the purchaser, identify and separate the intellectual property to be divested from the intellectual property that we wish to keep and reduce fixed costs previously associated with the divested assets of the business.
 
Managing acquisitions and divestitures requires varying levels of management resources, which may divert management’s attention from our other business operations. Acquisitions, including abandoned acquisitions, also may result in significant costs and expenses and charges to earnings.
 
19

Restructuring activities may result in business disruptions and may not produce the full efficiency and cost reduction benefits anticipated. Further, the benefits may be realized later than expected and the cost of implementing these measures may be greater than anticipated. If these measures are not successful, we may need to undertake additional cost reduction efforts, which could result in future charges. Moreover, we could experience business disruptions with customers and elsewhere if our cost reduction and restructuring efforts prove ineffective and our ability to achieve our other strategic goals and business plans as well as our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

 
18

In order to be successful, we must retain and motivate key employees, and failure to do so could seriously harm us.
 
In order to be successful, we must retain and motivate executives and other key employees, including those in managerial, technical, marketing and information technology support positions. In particular, our product generation efforts depend on hiring and retaining qualified engineers. Attracting and retaining skilled workers and qualified sales representatives is also critical to us. Experienced management and technical, marketing and support personnel in the microelectronics and test solutions industries are in demand and competition for their talents is intense. Employee retention may be a particularly challenging issue following acquisitions or divestitures since we also must continue to motivate employees and keep them focused on our strategies and goals, which may be particularly difficult due to the potential distractions related to integrating the acquired operations or divesting businesses to be sold.
 
We may be required to make significant payments to members of our management in the event their employment with us is terminated.
 
We are a party to employment agreements with each of Leonard Borow, our President and Chief Executive Officer, John Buyko, our Executive Vice President and President of our AMS division, John Adamovich, our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Charles Badlato, our Vice President-Treasurer, and Carl Caruso, our Vice President-Manufacturing. In the event we terminate the employment of any of these executives, or in certain cases, if such executives terminate their employment with us, such executives will be entitled to receive certain severance and related payments. The aggregate amount payable by us to Messrs. Borow, Buyko, Adamovich, Badlato and Caruso upon the termination of their respective employment with us is $10.0 million.
We are currently involved in stockholder litigation in connection with the Transactions which may adversely affect our financial condition.
An amended class action complaint was filed against us and our board of directors on June 20, 2007 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County. The complaint alleges that our board breached its fiduciary duties to our stockholders (i) by issuing a preliminary proxy statement on June 5, 2007 in connection with seeking stockholder approval of the Acquisition and (ii) in approving certain amendments, that were allegedly beyond the scope of our corporate power, to our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the employment agreements of defendants Harvey R. Blau, our then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Leonard Borow, our then President and Chief Operating Officer. The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief with respect to the first cause of action, seeking to enjoin the July 26, 2007 special meeting of our stockholders on the grounds that we and our board of directors provided inadequate disclosures, and the recovery of money damages with respect to the second cause of action. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their motion for preliminary injunctive relief. On July 9, 2007, we and our board of directors filed a motion to dismiss the amended class action complaint and that motion is currently pending.  The July 26, 2007 stockholders meeting went forward and the Company’s stockholders approved the Merger. On August 15, 2007, the Acquisition of the Company was completed. We are currently in settlement discussions with the plaintiffs and have accrued an insignificant liability for the settlement.
Securities litigation can be costly, time-consuming and could divert funds and management and other resources away from our business and operations. While we cannot predict the outcome of this matter and this matter will take time to resolve, damages arising from this stockholder litigation, if it is resolved against us or in connection with any settlement, absent insurance coverage or damages in excess of insurance coverage, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Our operating results may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis.
 
Our sales and other operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect this trend will continue. Factors which affect our results include:
 
the timing, cancellation or rescheduling of customer estimates, orders and shipments;
 
20

the pricing and mix of products sold;
 
our ability to obtain components and subassemblies from contract manufacturers and suppliers;
 
variations in manufacturing efficiencies; and
 
research and development and new product introductions.
 
Many of these factors are beyond our control. Our performance in any one fiscal quarter is not necessarily indicative of any financial trends or future performance.
 
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks that are inherent in our sales commitments, anticipated sales, and assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. For fiscal 2008,2009, sales of our products to foreign customers accounted for approximately 46%41% of our net sales. In addition, a portion of our product and component manufacturing, along with key suppliers, are located outside of the United States. Failure to sufficiently hedge or otherwise manage foreign currency risks properly could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, the recent strengthening of the U.S. dollar associated with the global financial crisis may adversely affect the results of our international operations when those results are translated into U.S. dollars.
 
Our operations are subject to business interruptions and casualty losses.
 
Our business is subject to numerous inherent risks, particularly unplanned events such as inclement weather, explosions, fires, terrorist acts, other accidents, equipment failures and transportation interruptions. While our insurance coverage could offset losses relating to some of these types of events, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely impacted to the extent any such losses are not covered by our insurance.

 
19

Compliance with and changes in environmental, health and safety laws regulating the present and past operations of our business and the business of predecessor companies could increase the costs of producing our products and expose us to environmental claims.
 
Our business is subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations concerning environmental, health and safety matters, including those relating to air emissions, wastewater discharges and the generation, handling, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of, or exposure to, hazardous substances. Violations of such laws and regulations can lead to substantial fines and penalties and other civil or criminal sanctions. We incur costs associated with compliance with these laws and regulations and we face risks of additional costs and liabilities including those related to the investigation and remediation of, or claims for personal injuries or property damages associated with, past or present contamination, at current as well as former properties utilized by us and at third-party disposal sites, regardless of fault or the legality of the original activities that led to such contamination.
 
In addition, future developments, such as changes in laws and regulations or the enforcement thereof, more stringent enforcement or interpretation thereof and claims for property damage or personal injury could cause us to incur substantial losses or expenditures. Although we believe we are materially compliant with all applicable current laws and regulations, any new or modified laws or regulations, or the discovery of any currently unknown non-compliance or contamination, could increase the cost of producing our products, thereby adversely impacting our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We rely on our information technology systems to manage numerous aspects of our business and a disruption of these systems could adversely affect our business.
 
Our information technology, or IT, systems are an integral part of our business and a serious disruption to our IT systems could significantly limit our ability to manage and operate our business efficiently, which in turn could materially adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. We depend on our IT systems for scheduling, sales order entry, purchasing, materials management, accounting and production functions. Our IT systems also allow us to ship products to our customers on a timely basis, maintain cost-effective operations and provide a high level of customer service. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning does not account for all eventualities.
 
21

In the event that certain of our customers encounter financial difficulties and fail to pay us, it could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We manufacture products to customer specifications and generally purchase raw materials in response to customer orders. In addition, we may commit significant amounts of capital to maintain inventory in anticipation of customer orders. In the event that our customers for whom we maintain inventory experience financial difficulties, we may be unable to sell such inventory at its current profit margin, if at all. In such an event, our gross margins would decline. In addition, if the financial condition of a significant portion of our customer base deteriorates, resulting in an impairment of their ability to pay us amounts owed in respect of a significant amount of outstanding receivables, our financial condition would be adversely affected.
 
Due to the international nature of our business, political or economic changes could harm our future sales, expenses and financial condition.
 
Our future sales, costs and expenses could be adversely affected by a variety of international factors, including:
 
changes in a country’s or region’s political or economic conditions;
 
longer accounts receivable cycles;
 
trade protection measures;
 
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
 
differing technology standards and/or customer requirements; and
 
import or export licensing requirements, which could affect our ability to obtain favorable terms for components or lead to penalties or restrictions.
 
For fiscal 2008,2009, sales of our products to foreign customers accounted for approximately 46%41% of our net sales. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we employed 790over 720 employees overseas. In addition, a portion of our product and component manufacturing, along with key suppliers, is located outside of the United States, and also could be disrupted by some of the international factors described above.

20
 
Efforts to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will involve significant expenditures, and non-compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may adversely affect us.
 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission that are applicable to us as a result of registering the exchange offering of Notes in January 2009, have increased the scope, complexity and cost of our corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices.  We expect tocould experience greater outside and internal costs as a result of our continuing efforts to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
 
We are currentlywere not required to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until one year after we file our initial Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.2009; however, compliance is required for fiscal 2010. We believe that we will be able to timely meet our obligations under Section 404 and that our management will be able to certify as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. However, we may identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses that we cannot remedy in a timely manner. In such event, we may be unable to receive a positive attestation from our independent registered public accounting firm with respect to our internal control over financial reporting.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains "forward-looking statements." All statements other than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking" statements for purposes of the U.S. federal and state securities laws. These statements may be identified by the use of forward looking terminology such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "might," "plan," "potential," "predict," "should" or "will" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. In particular, statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance contained in this prospectus under the headings "Prospectus Summary," "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business" are forward-looking statements.

22

We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. While we believe these expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections are reasonable, such forward looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. These and other important factors, including those discussed in this prospectus under the headings "Prospectus Summary," "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business," may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Some of the key factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations include:

• adverse developments in general business, economic and political conditions domestically or internationally;
adverse developments in general business, economic and political conditions domestically or internationally;

our ability to remain competitive in the markets we serve;
 
our failure to comply with regulations such as International Traffic in Arms Regulations and any changes in regulations;
 
our inability to continue to develop, manufacture and market innovative products and services that meet customer requirements for performance and reliability;
 
our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risks;
 
our exposure to auction rate securities and the impact this exposure has on our liquidity;
 
our failure to realize anticipated benefits from completed acquisitions, divestitures or restructurings, or the possibility that such acquisitions, divestitures or restructurings could adversely affect us;
 
the loss of key employees;
 
• terrorist acts or acts of war; and
terrorist acts or acts of war; and

• other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the caption "Risk Factors."
other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the caption "Risk Factors."

21

Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this prospectus are made only as of the date hereof.

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

The following table sets forth our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the last five fiscal years and for the three months ended September 30, 2008:years:

  Year Ended June 30,   Three Months Ended September 30,  
  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2008 
                   
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  7.7x  8.6x  15.4x  9.8x  *   * 
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
                
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  *   *   9.8x  15.4x  8.6x

*The ratio was computed by dividing earnings by fixed charges.  For this purpose, “earnings” represents income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of deferred financing costs and one-third of rent expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factored in those rentals.
*The deficit of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $92.0 million and $160.8 million, and for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $17.3 million.respectively.

USE OF PROCEEDS

This prospectus is delivered in connection with the sale of Notes by Goldman, Sachs & Co. in market-making transactions.  We will not receive any proceeds from such transactions.

23

CAPITALIZATION
 
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and our capitalization as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009. The information in the table should be read in conjunction with “Selected Historical Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
 
As of September 30, 2008
  
As of June 30, 2009
 
 
Actual
  
Actual
 
 (in millions)  (in millions) 
Cash and cash equivalents $73.1  $57.7 
Debt:        
Senior Secured Credit Facility $519.8 
Senior notes  225.0 
Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility  135.2 
Senior Secured Term Loans $515.8 
Senior Unsecured Notes  225.0 
Senior Subordinated Unsecured Term Loan  147.5 
Other indebtedness  1.4   1.0 
Total debt  881.4   889.3 
Stockholder’s equity  245.9   159.8 
Total capitalization $1,127.3  $1,049.1 


22
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATIONDATA

The following unaudited pro formaconsolidated financial information is based ondata set forth below as of and for fiscal 2009 (Successor), the periods from August 15, 2007 through June 30, 2008 (Successor) and July 1, 2007 through August 14, 2007 (Predecessor), and fiscal 2007 (Predecessor) have been derived from our audited and unauditedconsolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, adjusted to illustrate the pro forma effectprospectus.  The consolidated financial data set forth below as of and for fiscal 2005 and 2006 (Predecessor) have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this prospectus.  As part of the Transactions consummated on August 15, 2007Acquisition, we entered into the various financing arrangements described herein and, the offering of the Notes and the payment of fees and expenses relating thereto. The unaudited pro forma statements of operations for fiscal 2008 and the three months ended September 30, 2008 give effectas a result, we now have a different capital structure than that which existed prior to the Transactions and the offering of the Notes and the payment of fees and expenses relating thereto as if they had occurred on July 1, 2007.  The unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of September 30, 2008 gives effect to the payment of fees and expenses relating to the offering of the Notes as if it had occurred on September 30, 2008.  The pro forma effects of the acquisitions of Test Evolution Corporation on October 1, 2007 and Gaisler Research AB on June 30, 2008 are not reflected in the unaudited pro forma statement of operations for fiscal 2008 as the effects are immaterial.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is for informational purposes only and is not intended to representAcquisition.  Accordingly, the results of operations or financial position that we would have reported hadfor periods subsequent to the Transactions and the offeringconsummation of the NotesAcquisition and the payment of fees and expenses relating thereto been completed as of the dates presented, and shouldrelated financing transactions (Successor Entity) will not necessarily be taken as representative of our future results of operations or financial position.comparable to prior periods (Predecessor Entity).

The unaudited pro formaselected consolidated financial informationdata below should be read in conjunction with the information contained in “Use of Proceeds,” “Capitalization,” “Selected Historical Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,”Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

  (Successor Entity)  (Successor Entity)  (Predecessor Entity) 
                   
     Period  Period          
     August 15,  July 1,          
  Year  2007  2007          
  Ended  through  through  Years Ended June 30, 
  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,          
  2009  2008  2007  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
                   
Operations Statement Data:                  
                   
Net sales $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146  $546,243  $452,984 
                         
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (76,688)  (100,604)  (14,408)  8,794   33,748   17,430 
                         
Discontinued operations, net  -   (4,821)  (2,508)  (3,868)  (5,652)  (389)
                         
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net  -   -   -   -   (1,137) (1)  - 
                         
Net income (loss)*  (76,688)  (105,425)  (16,916)  4,926   26,959   17,041 

* We have not presented earnings (loss) per share data because all 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2009 and 2008 are held by one shareholder.

(1)The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle relates to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 47, effective June 30, 2006, including the recording of a fixed asset and an asset retirement obligation liability for certain leases of $2.4 million each and $1.6 million accumulated depreciation, and an after tax charge of $1.1 million.

The comparability of the selected financial data provided above is effected by, among other things, certain accounting changes, business combinations and dispositions, which are more completely described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein.

23

The following data in the table below effects the comparability of the results of operations for each of the periods shown:

  (All items shown in this table are before income taxes) 
                   
     August 15,  July 1,          
  Fiscal Year  2007  2007  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year 
  Ended  to  to  Ended  Ended  Ended 
  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30,  June 30,  June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  2007  2006  2005 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  Entity  Entity  Entity  Entity  Entity  Entity 
  (In thousands) 
                   
Amortization of acquired intangibles $62,962  $73,076  $1,692  $13,006  $13,778  $8,896 
Share based compensation  1,955   3,123   214   4,084   6,652   - 
Restructuring charges  4,102   6,995   3,778   2,840   3,214   3,124 
Company Sale Transaction and merger related expenses  4,283   36,585   5,036   30,584   -   - 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  41,225   -   -   -   -   - 
Acquired in-process R&D costs  1,665   24,975   -   -   -   2,974 
Current period impact of acquisition related adjustments (inventory, depreciation and deferred revenue)  5,149   45,578   57   -   1,088   840 
Development contract loss accrual  -   -   -   -   3,946   - 
Interest expense  83,823   74,658   275   672   608   895 

 
24
 

 Aeroflex Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2008
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
     Adjustments    
   Historical  for the Notes    
   Aeroflex  Offering  Pro Forma 
Assets         
Current assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents $73,066  $(500) (a) $72,566 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,829  110,297   -   110,297 
Inventories  136,977   -   136,977 
Deferred income taxes  26,460   -   26,460 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  12,445   -   12,445 
Total current assets  359,245   (500)  358,745 
             
Property, plant and equipment, net  101,349   -   101,349 
Non-current marketable securities  18,755   -   18,755 
Deferred financing costs, net  29,435   -   29,435 
Other assets  15,141   -   15,141 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  321,760   -   321,760 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives  120,051   -   120,051 
Goodwill  456,193   -   456,193 
Total assets $1,421,929  $(500) $1,421,424 
             
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity            
Current liabilities:            
Current portion of long-term debt $5,570  $-  $5,570 
Accounts payable  31,882   -   31,882 
Advance payments by customers and deferred revenue  18,997   -   18,997 
Income taxes payable  2,097   -   2,097 
Accrued payroll expenses  25,754   -   25,754 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  58,767   -   58,767 
Total current liabilities  143,067   -   143,067 
Long-term debt  875,813   -   875,813 
Deferred income taxes  143,491   -   143,491 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,156   -   6,156 
Other long-term liabilities  7,470   -   7,470 
Total liabilities  1,175,997   -   1,175,997 
Stockholder’s equity:            
Common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 1,000 shares; issued and 1,000 shares  -   -   - 
Additional paid-in capital  382,214   -   382,214 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (23,960)  -   (23,960)
Accumulated deficit  (112,322)  (500) (a)  (112,822)
Total stockholder’s equity  245,932   (500)  245,432 
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity $1,421,929  $(500) $1,421,429 
(a)Reflects the payment of estimated fees and expenses to be incurred in connection with the Notes Offering.
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma financial statements.
  (Successor  (Successor             
  Entity)  Entity)  (Predecessor Entity) 
                   
     Period  Period          
     August 15,  July 1,          
  Year  2007  2007          
  Ended  through  through  Years Ended June 30, 
  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,          
  2009  2008  2007  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands, except ratios) 
                   
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):                  
Working capital (1)
 $221,406  $220,855  $218,072  $201,603  $199,780  $161,749 
Total Assets  1,361,597   1,478,999   682,776   674,396   633,391   589,849 
                         
Long-term debt (including current portion)  889,348   878,811   3,554   3,583   4,165   4,824 
Stockholders' equity  159,760   276,648   506,622   510,697   487,670   443,980 
                         
Cash Flow Data:                        
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities  54,457   8,910   11,293   20,802   36,697   36,611 
                         
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities  (36,213)  (1,162,376)  8,406   (19,113)  (42,553)  (117,646)
                         
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities  (5,914)  1,209,045   12,619   (793)  3,748   (4,039)
                         
Other Financial Data:                        
EBITDA (unaudited)(2)
 $76,229  $28,159  $(17,302) $64,543  $85,267  $56,300 
                         
Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited)(3)
 $145,340                     
                         
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (4)
  *   *   *   9.8x  15.4x  8.6x
 
*The deficit of earnings to fixed charges was $92.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009, $139.5 million for the period August 15, 2007 through June 30, 2008 and $21.2 million for the period July 1, 2007 through August 14, 2007.

(1)   Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.

(2)   As used herein, “EBITDA” represents income (loss) from continuing operations plus (i) interest expense, (ii) provision for income taxes and (iii) depreciation and amortization.

We have included information concerning EBITDA in this report because we believe that such information is used by certain investors, securities analysts and others as one measure of an issuer’s performance and historical ability to service debt.  In addition, we use EBITDA when interpreting operating trends and results of operations of our business.  EBITDA is also widely used by us and others in our industry to evaluate and to price potential acquisition candidates.  EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, earnings from operations, cash flows from operations or other traditional GAAP indications of an issuer’s operating performance or liquidity.

25

Aeroflex IncorporatedThe use of EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and Subsidiariesyou should not consider this measure in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.
Unaudited Condensed Pro Forma Consolidated Statement
The following table is a reconciliation of Operations
Forincome (loss) from continuing operations to EBITDA for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008periods indicated:
(In thousands)
  (Successor  (Successor             
  Entity)  Entity)  (Predecessor Entity) 
                   
     Period  Period          
     August 15,  July 1,          
  Year  2007  2007          
  Ended  through  through  Years Ended June 30, 
  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,          
  2009  2008  2007  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
                   
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(76,688) $(100,604) $(14,408) $8,794  $33,748  $17,430 
                         
Interest expense  83,823   74,658   275   672   608   895 
                         
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (15,332)  (38,927)  (6,831)  24,935   20,540   13,663 
                         
Depreciation and amortization  84,426   93,032   3,662   30,142   30,371   24,312 
                         
EBITDA (unaudited) $76,229  $28,159  $(17,302) $64,543  $85,267  $56,300 
     Adjustments  Adjustments    
   Historical  for the  for the Notes  Pro Forma 
   Aeroflex  Transactions  Offering  Aeroflex 
             
Net sales $643,212  $(56) (a) $-  $643,156 
Cost of sales  375,814   258  (b)  -   376,072 
Gross profit  267,398   (314)  -   267,084 
                 
Selling, general and administrative costs  140,117   275  (c)  -   139,709 
       (840) (d)  -     
       157  (b)        
Research and developments costs  82,076   124  (b)  -   82,200 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  74,768   7,862  (e)  -   82,630 
Acquired in-process research and development  24,975   (24,975) (f)  -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  36,210   -   -   36,210 
   358,146   (17,397)  -   340,749 
Operating income (loss)  (90,748)  17,083   -   (73,665)
                 
Other income (expense)                
Interest expense  (74,933)  (15,044) (g)  -   (89,977)
Other income (expense), net  4,911   -   (500) (i)  4,411 
Total other income (expense)  (70,022)  (15,044)  (500)  (85,566)
                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (160,770)  2,039   (500)  (159,231)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (45,758)  (8,489) (h)  (185) (i)  (54,432)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (115,012)  10,528   (315)  (104,799)
                 
Income (loss) from discontinued  operations, net of tax provision (benefit)  (7,329)  -   -   (7,329)
Net income (loss) $(122,341) $10,528  $(315) $(112,128)

(3)The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is based on the definitions in our debt agreements and is not defined under U.S. GAAP.  Our use of the term Adjusted EBITDA may vary from others in our industry.  Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of operating income (loss), performance or liquidity under U.S. GAAP and is subject to important limitations.  A reconciliation of EBITDA is as follows:
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma financial statements.

 
26
 


Aeroflex Incorporated
  Year Ended 
  June 30, 2009 
    
  (Successor Entity) 
  (In thousands) 
    
EBITDA (unaudited) $76,229 
     
Non-cash purchase accounting adjustments  2,749 
     
Merger related expenses  4,283 
     
Restructuring costs (a)
  4,102 
     
Share based compensation (b)
  1,955 
     
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  41,225 
     
Other defined items (c)
  14,797 
     
Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited) $145,340(d)

(a)Primarily reflects costs associated with the reorganization of our U.K. operations.
(b)Reflects non-cash share-based employee compensation expense under the provisions of SFAS 123(R),  Share-Based Payments.
(c)Reflects other adjustments required in calculating our debt covenant compliance such as pro forma Adjusted EBITDA for companies acquired during the year and other non-cash charges.
(d)Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited) for the year ended June 30, 2008 (Predecessor and Successor  combined) was $135.1 million.

(4)In calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of deferred financing costs and one-third of rent expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factored in those rentals.

27

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The statements in the discussion and Subsidiariesanalysis regarding our expectations regarding the performance of our business and any forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Selected Historical Financial Data” and our historical financial statements, including the related notes, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Unaudited Condensed Pro Forma Consolidated Statement
Overview
We are a leading provider of highly specialized microelectronics and test and measurement equipment, primarily to the global aerospace and defense and broadband communications markets. We also design application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”) for CT scan equipment for the medical industry. Founded in 1937, we have developed a substantial intellectual property portfolio that includes more than 150 patents, extensive know-how, years of collaborative research and development with our customers and a demonstrated history in space. We believe that the combination of our leading market positions, complementary portfolio of products, years of experience and engineering capabilities provides us with a competitive advantage and enables us to deliver high performance, high value products to our customers.
The Acquisition
On August 15, 2007, we were acquired by our parent pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger, or merger agreement (referred to in this section as the Acquisition or Company Sale Transaction).
The Acquisition was funded by:
equity investments in the parent of approximately $378.4 million by affiliates of, or funds managed by, the Sponsors and certain members of our management;
borrowings under a senior secured credit facility, consisting of $525.0 million under our term loan facility;
borrowings under an exchangeable senior unsecured credit facility, consisting of a $225.0 million term loan facility; and
borrowings under an exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured credit facility, consisting of a $120.0 million term loan facility.
On September 21, 2007, we entered into a $120.0 million senior subordinated unsecured credit facility to refinance our $120.0 million exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured credit facility.  On August 7, 2008, we issued 11.75% unsecured senior notes, i.e., the Original Notes, to refinance the $225.0 million exchangeable senior unsecured credit facility.  On January 21, 2009, the SEC declared effective our exchange offer registration statement, which resulted in an exchange of securities pursuant to which all of the Original Notes were exchanged for publicly registered 11.75% unsecured notes due February 15, 2015 with substantially identical terms as the exchanged notes.
Results of Operations
Refer to Notes 1 and 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for details concerning the Company’s August 15, 2007 acquisition by affiliates of or funds managed by the Sponsors and certain members of our management and the basis upon which such consolidated financial statements are presented.  For comparative purposes, in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, we combined the Three Months Ended SeptemberPredecessor period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 with the Successor period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 to form the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.  This combination is not a GAAP presentation. However, we believe this presentation is useful to the reader as a comparison to the Successor period for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.

(In thousands)
28

The following table sets forth our historical results of operations as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated below:

    Non-GAAP          
    combined          
    Predecessor          
 Successor  and Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
       Period  Period    
 Fiscal  Fiscal  August 15,  July 1,  Fiscal 
 Year  Year  2007  2007  Year 
    Adjustments     Ended  Ended  through  through  Ended 
 Historical  for the Notes  Pro Forma  June 30,  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30, 
 Aeroflex  Offering  Aeroflex  2009  2008  2008  2007  2007 
                        
Net sales $140,845  $-  $140,845  100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of sales  73,486   -   73,486 
Costs of sales  52.4   58.4   58.3   59.8   52.1 
Gross profit  67,359   -   67,359   47.6   41.6   41.7   40.2   47.9 
                    
Operating expenses:                    
Selling, general and administrative costs  31,484   -   31,484  21.4  21.8  20.0  49.8  21.8 
Research and developments costs  17,029   -   17,029 
Research and development costs 11.7  12.8  11.6  31.9  12.9 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  17,968   -   17,968  10.5  11.6  12.1  4.4  2.2 
Acquired in-process research and development costs 0.3  3.9  4.1  -  - 
Company sale transaction expenses -  5.6  5.4  9.7  5.2 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  6.9   -   -   -   - 
Total operating expenses  66,481   -   66,481   50.8   55.7   53.2   95.8   42.1 
                    
Operating income (loss)  878   -   878  (3.2) (14.1) (11.5) (55.6) 5.8 
Interest expense  (21,215)  -   (21,215)
Other income (expense)  3,086   -   3,086 
Total other income (expense)  (18,129)  -   (18,129)
Income (loss) before income taxes  (17,251)  -   (17,251)
                    
Other income (expense), net  (12.2)  (10.9)  (11.6)  -   (0.1)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes (15.4) (25.0) (23.1) (55.6) 5.7 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (10,354)  -   (10,354)  (2.6)  (7.2)  (6.5)  (17.9)  4.2 
                    
Income (loss) from continuing operations (12.8) (17.8) (16.6) (37.7) 1.5 
Discontinued operations  -   (1.1)  (0.8)  (6.6)  (0.7)
Net income (loss) $(6,897) $-  $(6,897)  (12.8) %  (18.9) %  (17.4) %  (44.3)%  0.8%

 See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma financial statements.
27
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Pro Forma Consolidated
StatementsMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The statements in the discussion and analysis regarding our expectations regarding the performance of Operations
Forour business and any forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008
(risks and uncertainties described in thousands)“Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Selected Historical Financial Data” and our historical financial statements, including the related notes, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
(a)To reflect the impact on net sales of the purchase accounting fair value adjustment to deferred revenues for the forty-five days prior to the Acquisition.

Net Sales$(56)
Overview
 
(b)To reflect the incremental depreciation expense for the  impact of the purchase accounting fair value adjustment to fixed assets for the forty-five days prior to the Acquisition.

Cost of sales $258 
Selling, general and administrative costs  157 
Research and development costs  124 
  $539 

(c)To record annual advisory fees pursuant to the merger agreement entered into in connection with the Acquisition for the forty-five days prior to the Acquisition.

Selling, general and administrative costs$275
We are a leading provider of highly specialized microelectronics and test and measurement equipment, primarily to the global aerospace and defense and broadband communications markets. We also design application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”) for CT scan equipment for the medical industry. Founded in 1937, we have developed a substantial intellectual property portfolio that includes more than 150 patents, extensive know-how, years of collaborative research and development with our customers and a demonstrated history in space. We believe that the combination of our leading market positions, complementary portfolio of products, years of experience and engineering capabilities provides us with a competitive advantage and enables us to deliver high performance, high value products to our customers.
 
(d)To record the impact of new management employment contracts that were entered into in connection with the Acquisition, including the retirement of the former CEO, the modification of our current President’s (formerly the Company’s Chief Operating Officer) contract and the elimination of the Company’s SERP for the forty-five days prior to the Acquisition.
The Acquisition
On August 15, 2007, we were acquired by our parent pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger, or merger agreement (referred to in this section as the Acquisition or Company Sale Transaction).
The Acquisition was funded by:
 
Selling, general and administrative costs$(840)
(e)Reflects the elimination of amortization expense relating to historical acquired intangible assets and the addition of amortization expense relating to acquired amortizable intangible assets of $413.4 million resulting from the Acquisition.
Pro forma amortization $82,630 
Historical amortization  74,768 
Pro forma adjustment $7,862 
(f)Reflects the elimination from the pro forma statements of operations of  charges that we have recorded in connection with the Acquisition of $25.0 million for In-Process Research and Development.

(g)Reflects the elimination of historical interest and related expenses, including on mortgage debt that was repaid on August 15, 2007 and the revolving credit facility that was terminated in connection with the Transactions and the addition of interest expense on our Senior Secured Credit Facility, the senior subordinated unsecured term loan and the Notes offered hereby.
28
equity investments in the parent of approximately $378.4 million by affiliates of, or funds managed by, the Sponsors and certain members of our management;
 
  (in thousands) 
    
Pro forma interest expense on our senior secured term loan facility, the senior subordinated unsecured term loan and senior notes:   
Cash interest $72,428 
Paid-in-kind interest  11,340 
 Amortization of debt issuance costs (1)  4,629 
 Other interest  1,580 
Pro forma interest expense  89,977 
Historical interest expense  74,933 
Pro forma adjustment $15,044 
(1)          Reflects non-cash interest expense related to capitalized debt issuance costs of $27.9 million that are being amortized over the term of the related facility (six years for the revolvingborrowings under a senior secured credit facility, seven years for the senior securedconsisting of $525.0 million under our term loan facility;
borrowings under an exchangeable senior unsecured credit facility, consisting of a $225.0 million term loan facility; and eight years for the
borrowings under an exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured credit facility, consisting of a $120.0 million term loan andfacility.
On September 21, 2007, we entered into a $120.0 million senior subordinated unsecured credit facility to refinance our $120.0 million exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured credit facility.  On August 7, 2008, we issued 11.75% unsecured senior notes, i.e., the Original Notes, to refinance the $225.0 million exchangeable senior unsecured loan).credit facility.  On January 21, 2009, the SEC declared effective our exchange offer registration statement, which resulted in an exchange of securities pursuant to which all of the Original Notes were exchanged for publicly registered 11.75% unsecured notes due February 15, 2015 with substantially identical terms as the exchanged notes.
 
(h)Reflects the estimated tax benefit on the pre-tax effect of the pro forma adjustments at our marginal rate of 37%. However, a portion of the interest expense may not be deductible for income tax purposes and would result in a reduction of the income tax benefit indicated.
Results of Operations
 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$(8,489)
(i)Reflects expense for the estimated fees and expenses to be incurred for the registration of the Notes and related tax benefit.
Estimated fees and expenses to be incurred in connection with the Notes Offering $500 
Tax benefit  (185)
  $315 
29

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA

The consolidated financial data set forth below as ofRefer to Notes 1 and 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal 2006 and 2007 anddetails concerning the periods from July 1, 2007 through August 14, 2007 andCompany’s August 15, 2007 through June 30, 2008 have been derived fromacquisition by affiliates of or funds managed by the Sponsors and certain members of our auditedmanagement and the basis upon which such consolidated financial statements included elsewhereare presented.  For comparative purposes, in this prospectus. The consolidated financial data for the three months ended September 30, 2008 has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements for that period, and except as described in the notes thereto, has been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, including usual recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of that information for such period. The financial data presented for the interim period is not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  The consolidated financial data set forth below as of and for fiscal 2004 and 2005 have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this prospectus.  As part of the Acquisition, we entered into the various financing arrangements described herein and, as a result, we now have a different capital structure. Accordingly, the results of operations for periods subsequent to the consummation of the Acquisition and related financing transactions will not necessarily be comparable to prior periods.
The selected consolidated financial data below should be read in conjunction with “Management’sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” andOperations, we combined the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere inPredecessor period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 with the Successor period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 to form the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.  This combination is not a GAAP presentation. However, we believe this prospectus.presentation is useful to the reader as a comparison to the Successor period for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.

3028

  Predecessor  Successor  Successor 
  Years Ended June 30,  
Period
July 1,
 2007
through
August 14,
  
Period
August 15,
2007
through
June 30,
  
Three Months
Ended
September
 
  2004  2005  2006  2007  2007  2008   
30, 2008
 
  (in thousands)           
Operations Statement Data:              
              
Net sales $404,478  $452,984  $546,243  $593,146  $38,221  $604,991  $140,845 
Costs of sales  216,273   238,210   284,312   308,969   22,861   352,953   73,486 
Gross Profit  188,205   214,774   261,931   284,177   15,360   252,038   67,359 
Selling, general and administrative costs    93,792     111,661     122,871     129,621     19,031   121,086   31,484 
Research and development costs  49,813   61,099   72,055   76,717   12,178   69,898   17,029 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  7,730     8,896     13,778     13,006      1,692   73,076   17,968 
Acquired in-process research and development costs    4,220     2,974     -     -     -   24,975   - 
Company Sale Transaction expenses     -      -      -      30,584      3,717   32,493   - 
Operating income (loss)   32,650    30,144    53,227    34,249   (21,258)  (69,490)  878 
Other income (expense) Interest expense  (1,403)  (895)  (608)  (672)  (275)  (74,658)  (21,215)
Other income (expense)  (1,711)   1,844    1,669    152    294   4,617   3,086 
Total other income (expense)  (3,114)   949    1,061   (520)   19   (70,041)  (18,129)
                             
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes        29,536         31,093         54,288         33,729   (21,239)  (139,531)  (17,251)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes   11,204    13,663    20,540    24,935   (6,831)  (38,927)  (10,354)
Income (loss) from continuing operations    18,332     17,430     33,748     8,794   (14,408)  (100,604)  (6,897)
Discontinued operations, net  (6,185)  (389)  (5,652)  (3,868)  (2,508)  (4,821)  - 
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net     -      -   (1,137)     -      -      -      - 
                             
Net income (loss)* $12,147  $17,041  $26,959  $4,926  $(16,916) $(105,425) $(6,897)
31
*We have not presented earnings (loss) per share data because all 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding at  September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008 is held by one shareholder.
  Predecessor  Successor  Successor 
  Years Ended June 30,  
Period
July 1,
 2007
through
August 14,
  
Period
August 15,
2007
through
June 30,
  
Three
Months
Ended
September
 
  2004  2005  2006  2007  2007  2008  30, 2008 
  (In thousands) 
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):                      
Working
Capital (1)
 $237,865  $161,749  $199,780  $201,603  $218,072  $220,855  $216,178 
Total assets  551,391   589,849   633,391   674,936   682,776   1,478,999   1,421,929 
Long-term debt (including current portion)    10,275     4,824     4,165     3,583     3,554   878,811   881,383 
Stockholders’ equity  427,097   443,980   487,670   510,697   506,626   276,648   245,932 
Cash Flow Data:                            
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities    24,100     36,611     36,697     20,802     11,293   8,910   28,510 
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities  (73,067)  (117,646)  (42,553)  (19,113)    8,406   (1,162,376)  (3,341)
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities    94,421   (4,039)    3,748   (793)    12,619   1,209,045   (1,756)
Other Financial Data:                            
EBITDA (unaudited) (2) $52,695  $56,300   85,267   64,543   (17,302)  28,159   27,461 
Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited) (3)                          29,083 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (4)  7.7x  8.6x  15.4x  9.8x  *   *   * 
*
The deficit of earnings to fixed charges was $21.2 million for the period July 1, 2007 through August 14, 2007, $139.5 million for the period August 15, 2007 through June 30, 2008 and $17.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
(1)Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.
(2)As used herein, “EBITDA” represents income (loss) from continuing operations plus (i) interest expense, (ii) provision for income taxes and (iii) depreciation and amortization.
We have included information concerning EBITDA in this prospectus because we believe that such information is used by certain investors, securities analysts and others as one measure of an issuer’s performance andThe following table sets forth our historical ability to service debt. In addition, we use EBITDA when interpreting operating trends and results of operations of our business. EBITDA is also widely used by us and others in our industry to evaluate and to price potential acquisition candidates. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, earnings from operations, cash flows from operations or other traditional GAAP indications of an issuer’s operating performance or liquidity.
32
The use of EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider this measure in isolation, or as a substitute for analysispercentage of our results as reported under GAAP. For additional information regarding our use of EBITDA and limitations on its usefulness as an analytical tool, see “Use of Non-GAAP Measures.”
The following table is a reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations to EBITDAnet sales for the periods indicated:indicated below:
  Predecessor  Successor  Successor 
  
Years Ended June 30,
  
Period
July 1,
 2007
through
August
14,
  
Period
August 15,
2007
through
June 30,
  
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
 
  2004  2005  2006  2007  2007  2008  2008 
  (In thousands)          
Income (loss) from continuing operations $18,332  $17,430  $33,748  $8,794  $(14,408) $(100,604) $(6,897)
Interest expense  1,403   895   608   672   275   74,658   21,215 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  11,204   13,663   20,540   24,935   (6,831)  (38,927)  (10,354)
Depreciation and amortization  21,756   24,312   30,371   30,142    3,662   93,032   23,497 
                             
EBITDA (unaudited). $52,695  $56,300  $85,267  $64,543  $(17,302) $28,159  $27,461 
(3)The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is based on the definitions in our debt agreements and is not defined under U.S. GAAP.  Our use of the term Adjusted EBITDA may vary from others in our industry.  Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of operating income (loss), performance or liquidity under U.S. GAAP and is subject to important limitations.  For additional information regarding our use of Adjusted EBITDA and limitations on its usefulness as an analytical tool, see “Use of Non-GAAP Measures.”  A reconciliation of EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA is as follows:
33

  Three Months Ended 
  September 30, 2008 
  Successor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
    
EBITDA (unaudited) $27,461 
Impact of other non-cash purchase accounting adjustments  97 
Company sale transaction expenses and merger related expenses  634 
Restructuring costs (a)  402 
Share based compensation (b)  489 
Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited) $29,083 
     Non-GAAP          
     combined          
     Predecessor          
  Successor  and Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
        Period  Period    
  Fiscal  Fiscal  August 15,  July 1,  Fiscal 
  Year  Year  2007  2007  Year 
  Ended  Ended  through  through  Ended 
  June 30,  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30, 
  2009  2008  2008  2007  2007 
                
Net sales  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Costs of sales  52.4   58.4   58.3   59.8   52.1 
Gross profit  47.6   41.6   41.7   40.2   47.9 
                     
Operating expenses:                    
Selling, general and administrative costs  21.4   21.8   20.0   49.8   21.8 
Research and development costs  11.7   12.8   11.6   31.9   12.9 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  10.5   11.6   12.1   4.4   2.2 
Acquired in-process research and development costs  0.3   3.9   4.1   -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  -   5.6   5.4   9.7   5.2 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  6.9   -   -   -   - 
Total operating expenses  50.8   55.7   53.2   95.8   42.1 
                     
Operating income (loss)  (3.2)  (14.1)  (11.5)  (55.6)  5.8 
                     
Other income (expense), net  (12.2)  (10.9)  (11.6)  -   (0.1)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (15.4)  (25.0)  (23.1)  (55.6)  5.7 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (2.6)  (7.2)  (6.5)  (17.9)  4.2 
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (12.8)  (17.8)  (16.6)  (37.7)  1.5 
Discontinued operations  -   (1.1)  (0.8)  (6.6)  (0.7)
Net income (loss)  (12.8) %  (18.9) %  (17.4) %  (44.3)%  0.8%

(a)Primarily reflects costs associated with the reorganization of our U.K. operations.
(b)Reflects non-cash share-based employee compensation expense under the provisions of SFAS 123(R),  Share-Based Payments.
(4)In calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of deferred financing costs and one-third of rent expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factored in those rentals.
     * The deficit of earnings to fixed charges was $21.2 million for the period July 1, 2007 through August 14, 2007, $139.5 million for the period August 15, 2007 through June 30, 2008 and $17.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
34
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The statements in the discussion and analysis regarding our expectations regarding the performance of our business and any forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information,” “Selected Historical Financial Data” and our historical financial statements, including the related notes, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
Overview
 
We are a leading provider of highly specialized microelectronics and test and measurement equipment, primarily to the global aerospace and defense and broadband communications markets. We also design ASICsapplication specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”) for CT scan equipment for the medical industry. Founded in 1937, we have developed a substantial intellectual property portfolio that includes more than 150 patents, extensive know-how, years of collaborative research and development with our customers and a demonstrated history in space. We believe that the combination of our leading market positions, complementary portfolio of products, years of experience and engineering capabilities provides us with a competitive advantage and enables us to deliver high performance, high value products to our customers.
 
The Acquisition
 
On August 15, 2007, AX Acquisition Corp. (“AX Acquisition”)we were acquired by our parent pursuant to an agreement and the parent entered into aplan of merger, agreement with us. At the effective time of theor merger AX Acquisition was merged with and into us. We were the surviving corporation in the merger and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parentagreement (referred to in this section as the Acquisition or Company Sale Transaction).
 
The Acquisition was funded by:
 
equity investments in the parent of approximately $378.4 million by affiliates of, or funds managed by, the Sponsors and certain members of our management;
 
borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility,a senior secured credit facility, consisting of $525.0 million under our term loan facility;
 
borrowings under our Exchangeable Senior Unsecured Credit Facility,an exchangeable senior unsecured credit facility, consisting of a $225.0 million term loan facility; and
 
borrowings under our Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility,an exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured credit facility, consisting of a $120.0 million term loan facility.
 
On September 21, 2007, we entered into a $120.0 million Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facilitysenior subordinated unsecured credit facility to refinance our $120.0 million Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility.exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured credit facility.  On August 7, 2008, we issued an aggregate of11.75% unsecured senior notes, i.e., the Original Notes, to refinance the $225.0 million principal amountexchangeable senior unsecured credit facility.  On January 21, 2009, the SEC declared effective our exchange offer registration statement, which resulted in an exchange of securities pursuant to which all of the Original Notes were exchanged for publicly registered 11.75% seniorunsecured notes due February 15, 2015 towith substantially identical terms as the Initial Purchaser to refinance our $225.0 million Exchangeable Senior Unsecured Credit Facility.
Selected Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
Our results of operations have been affected by the following factors, which may cause our results of operations for certain periods to not be comparable to other periods.  These are not all of the factors that have affected our results of operations.
Acquisition Related Adjustments.  In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 we recorded charges of $25.0 million for acquired in-process research and development costs and expensed  $39.0 million in cost of sales related to an inventory purchase accounting acquisition adjustment.  There were no comparable charges for the three months ended September 30, 2008 or in fiscal 2007.  In addition, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and for the three months ended September 30, 2008, revenue was reduced for the impact of a deferred revenue purchase accounting acquisition adjustment by $2.5 million and $97,000, respectively.

35
 Sale Transaction Expenses.  In the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we incurred Company Sale Transaction  and related expenses of $41.6 million (including $5.4 million reported in S,G&A), and $30.6 million, respectively, consisting primarily of merger related change of control, severance and other compensation payments, a lawsuit settlement charge, a merger termination fee and legal and other professional fees.
The following table sets forth our historical results of operations as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated below:exchanged notes.
 
Results of Operations
  Predecessor  
Successor
  
Non-GAAP
Combined
Predecessor and Successor
  
Successor
 
                    
   
Years Ended June 30,
  
Period 
July 1,
2007
through
August 14,
  
Period 
August 15,
2007
through
June 30,
  
Year
Ended
June 30,
  
Three months 
ended September
  
Three months 
ended September
 
  2006  2007  2007  2008  2008  30, 2007  30, 2008 
                        
Net sales  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Cost of sales  52.0   52.1   59.8   58.3   58.4   62.5   52.2 
Gross profit  48.0   47.9   40.2   41.7   41.6   37.5   47.8 
Operating expenses:                            
Selling, general and administrative costs  22.5   21.8   49.8   20.0   21.8   27.1   22.3 
Research and development costs  13.2   12.9   31.9   11.6   12.8   16.2   12.1 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  2.5   2.2   4.4   12.1   11.6   8.7   12.8 
Acquired in process research and development costs  —   —   —   4.1   3.9   17.3   — 
Company sale transaction expenses  —   5.2   9.7   5.4   5.6   24.2   — 
Total operating expenses  38.2   42.1   95.8   53.2   55.7   93.5   47.2 
   9.8   5.8   (55.6)  (11.5)  (14.1)  (56.0)  0.6 
Other income (expense), net  0.2   (0.1)  0.0   (11.6)  (10.9)  (8.1)  (12.9)
Income (loss) from continuing 
operations before income taxes
  10.0   5.7   (55.6)  (23.1)  (25.0)  (64.1)  (12.3)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  3.8   4.2   (17.9)  (6.5)�� (7.2)  (18.5)  (7.4)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  6.2   1.5   (37.7)  (16.6)  (17.8)  (45.6)  (4.9)
Discontinued operations  (1.0)  (0.7)  (6.6)  (0.8)  (1.1)  (2.5)  — 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  (0.2)  —   —   —   —   —   — 
Net income (loss)  5.0%  0.8%  (44.3)%  (17.4)%  (18.9)%  (48.1)%  (4.9)%
Statements of Operations
 
Refer to Notes 1 and 3 to our annual consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008Consolidated Financial Statements for details concerning the Acquisition and the Transactions which occurred onCompany’s August 15, 2007 acquisition by affiliates of or funds managed by the Sponsors and certain members of our management and the basis upon which such consolidated financial statements are presented.  For comparative purposes, in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, we combined the Predecessor period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 with the Successor period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 to form the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and we combined the Predecessor period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 with the Successor period from August 15, 2007 to September 30, 2007 to form the three months ended September 30, 2007.2008.  This combination is not a GAAP presentation. However, we believe this presentation is useful to the reader as a comparison to the PredecessorSuccessor period for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 and the Successor three months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.2009.

 
3628
 

The following table sets forth our historical results of operations as a percentage of net sales and adjusted operating income by business segment and reconciles adjusted operating income to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes for the periods indicated.indicated below:

     Non-GAAP          
     combined          
     Predecessor          
  Successor  and Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
        Period  Period    
  Fiscal  Fiscal  August 15,  July 1,  Fiscal 
  Year  Year  2007  2007  Year 
  Ended  Ended  through  through  Ended 
  June 30,  June 30,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30, 
  2009  2008  2008  2007  2007 
                
Net sales  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Costs of sales  52.4   58.4   58.3   59.8   52.1 
Gross profit  47.6   41.6   41.7   40.2   47.9 
                     
Operating expenses:                    
Selling, general and administrative costs  21.4   21.8   20.0   49.8   21.8 
Research and development costs  11.7   12.8   11.6   31.9   12.9 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  10.5   11.6   12.1   4.4   2.2 
Acquired in-process research and development costs  0.3   3.9   4.1   -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  -   5.6   5.4   9.7   5.2 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  6.9   -   -   -   - 
Total operating expenses  50.8   55.7   53.2   95.8   42.1 
                     
Operating income (loss)  (3.2)  (14.1)  (11.5)  (55.6)  5.8 
                     
Other income (expense), net  (12.2)  (10.9)  (11.6)  -   (0.1)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (15.4)  (25.0)  (23.1)  (55.6)  5.7 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (2.6)  (7.2)  (6.5)  (17.9)  4.2 
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (12.8)  (17.8)  (16.6)  (37.7)  1.5 
Discontinued operations  -   (1.1)  (0.8)  (6.6)  (0.7)
Net income (loss)  (12.8) %  (18.9) %  (17.4) %  (44.3)%  0.8%
  For the Fiscal Years Ended  Three Months Ended 
   June 30, 2006  June 30, 2007  June 30, 2008  September 30, 2007  September 30, 2008 
                
Net sales:               
Microelectronic solutions ("AMS") $241,437  $266,515  $302,712  $67,413  $67,580 
Test solutions ("ATS")  304,806   326,631   340,500   72,823   73,265 
Net sales $546,243  $593,146  $643,212  $140,236  $140,845 
                     
Segment adjusted operating income:                    
- AMS $58,467  $63,908  $74,826  $15,257  $14,613 
- ATS  34,771   38,582   46,634   2,986   9,630 
General corporate expense  (15,279)  (17,727)  (10,523)  (2,827)  (2,696)
Adjusted operating income  77,959   84,763   110,937   15,416   21,547 
                     
Amortization of acquired intangibles                    
- AMS  (2,134)  (1,911)  (44,364)  (6,536)  (10,677)
- ATS  (11,644)  (11,095)  (30,404)  (5,625)  (7,291)
Share based compensation                    
- AMS  (1,488)  (965)  (83)  (83)  - 
- ATS  (1,731)  (958)  95   95   - 
- Corporate  (3,433)  (2,161)  (3,349)  (1,883)  (489)
Restructuring charges                    
- AMS  -   -   (414)  -   - 
- ATS  (3,214)  (2,840)  (10,359)  (3,809)  (402)
One-time lease termination costs                    
- ATS  -   -   (576)  (576)  - 
Merger related costs - Corporate  -   -   (5,411)  (3,501)  (634)
Acquired in-process R&D costs                    
- AMS  -   -   (16,335)  (15,700)  - 
- ATS  -   -   (8,640)  (8,640)  - 
Current period impact of acquisition                    
related adjustments:                    
Inventory - AMS  -   -   (23,874)  (7,217)  - 
Inventory - ATS  (1,088)  -   (15,151)  (5,240)  - 
Depreciation - AMS  - �� -   (1,025)  (146)  (286)
Depreciation - ATS  -   -   (2,882)  (412)  (738)
Depreciation - Corporate  -   -   (193)  (27)  (55)
Deferred revenue - ATS  -   -   (2,510)  (676)  (97)
Sale transaction expenses  -   (30,584)  (36,210)  (34,012)  - 
Operating income (loss) (GAAP)  53,227   34,249   (90,748)  (78,572)  878 
                     
Interest expense  (608)  (672)  (74,933)  (11,411)  (21,215)
Other income (expense), net  1,669   152   4,911   39   3,086 
Income (loss) from continuing                    
operations before income taxes $54,288  $33,729  $(160,770) $(89,944) $(17,251)

Statements of Operations

Management evaluates the operating results of the Company’s two segments based upon pre-tax operating income, before costs related to restructuring, lease termination charges, amortization of acquired intangibles, share-based compensation, acquired in-process research and development costs, Company Sale Transaction expenses, merger related expenses and the impact of any Acquisitionacquisition related adjustments.

 
3729
 

Three Months
     Non-GAAP          
     Combined          
     Predecessor          
  Successor  and Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  August 15, 2007     Fiscal Year 
  Ended  Ended  through  July 1, 2007  Ended 
  June 30,  June 30,  June 30,  to August 14,  June 30, 
  2009  2008  2008  2007  2007 
  (In thousands) 
Net sales:               
Microelectronic solutions ("AMS") $287,517  $302,712  $283,695  $19,017  $266,515 
Test solutions ("ATS")  311,819   340,500   321,296   19,204   326,631 
Net sales $599,336  $643,212  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 
                     
Segment adjusted operating income:                    
- AMS $63,368  $74,826  $74,802  $24  $63,908 
- ATS  50,141   46,634   54,216   (7,582)  38,582 
- General corporate expense  (11,377)  (10,523)  (8,176)  (2,347)  (17,727)
Adjusted operating income (loss)  102,132   110,937   120,842   (9,905)  84,763 
                     
Amortization of acquired intangibles                    
- AMS  (36,635)  (44,364)  (44,085)  (279)  (1,911)
- ATS  (26,327)  (30,404)  (28,991)  (1,413)  (11,095)
Share based compensation                    
- AMS  -   (83)  -   (83)  (965)
- ATS  -   95   -   95   (958)
- Corporate  (1,955)  (3,349)  (3,123)  (226)  (2,161)
Restructuring charges                    
- AMS  -   (414)  (414)  -   - 
- ATS  (4,102)  (10,359)  (6,581)  (3,778)  (2,840)
One-time lease termination costs                    
- ATS  -   (576)  -   (576)  - 
Merger related expenses - Corporate  (4,283)  (5,411)  (4,092)  (1,319)  - 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles                    
- AMS  (41,225)  -   -   -   - 
- ATS  -   -   -   -   - 
Acquired in-process R&D costs                    
- AMS  -   (16,335)  (16,335)  -   - 
- ATS  (1,665)  (8,640)  (8,640)  -   - 
Current period impact of acquisition related adjustments:                    
Inventory - AMS  -   (23,874)  (23,817)  (57)  - 
Inventory - ATS  (668)  (15,151)  (15,151)  -   - 
Depreciation - AMS  (1,143)  (1,025)  (1,025)  -   - 
Depreciation - ATS  (2,702)  (2,882)  (2,882)  -   - 
Depreciation - Corporate  (220)  (193)  (193)  -   - 
Deferred revenue - ATS  (416)  (2,510)  (2,510)  -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  -   (36,210)  (32,493)  (3,717)  (30,584)
Operating income (loss)  (19,209)  (90,748)  (69,490)  (21,258)  34,249 
                     
Interest expense  (83,823)  (74,933)  (74,658)  (275)  (672)
Other income (expense), net  11,012   4,911   4,617   294   152 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $(92,020) $(160,770) $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729 

30

Fiscal Year Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 Compared to Three MonthsFiscal Year Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20072008

Net Sales.  Net sales increaseddecreased 7% to $140.8$599.3 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 from $140.2$643.2 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2007.2008.

Net sales in the microelectronic solutions (“AMS”) segment increaseddecreased 5% to $67.6$287.5 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 from $67.4$302.7 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 primarily due to increaseda reduction in sales of components and microelectronic modules resulting from a general slowdown in the market combined with a demand surge experienced in the prior year that was not repeated in the current year.  This reduction is partially offset by an increase in sales volume of integrated circuits and motion control and integrated circuitsproducts combined with additional sales resulting from our acquisition of Gaisler in June 2008 ($1.4 million), offset by reductions in sales of microelectronics modules.$6.3 million.  Net sales in the test solutions (“ATS”) segment increaseddecreased 8% to $73.3$311.8 million in 20082009 from $72.8$340.5 million in 2007, partially2008.  The change in foreign currency exchange rates has negatively impacted 2009 U.K. sales by approximately $27 million.  Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rates, sales in the ATS segment for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 decreased approximately $1.7 million as compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.   The decrease was primarily due to increases in wireless and PXI sales, offset by reductionsa reduction in sales of radioPXI test equipment, signal generators and syntheticother test products.  Theproducts, offset by an increase in wireless product sales.  Further, the period ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009 was impacted by a purchase accounting adjustment to deferred revenue which reduced sales by $416,000, while the period ended June 30, 2008 was impacted by a purchase accounting adjustment to deferred revenue which reduced sales by $97,000; while the period ended September 30, 2007, was impacted by a purchase accounting adjustment to deferred revenue which reduced sales by $676,000.$2.5 million.

Gross Profit.  Gross profit equals net sales less cost of sales. Cost of sales includes materials, direct labor, amortization of capitalized software development costs and overhead expenses such as engineering labor, fringe benefits, depreciation, allocable occupancy costs and manufacturing supplies.

On a consolidated basis, gross margin was 47.8%47.6% for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and 37.5%41.6% for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2007.2008. In 2007,2009, gross margin was adversely affected by purchase accounting adjustments aggregating $13.4$3.1 million which (i) increased depreciation expense by $2.0 million related to acquisition date fair value adjustments (ii) increased cost of sales for the increase in the recorded value of VI Technology’s inventories by $668,000 to eliminate manufacturing profits inherent in the inventories on March 4, 2009, the date of the Company’s acquisition of VI Technology; and (iii) reduced sales for the year by $416,000 to eliminate selling profits inherent in certain acquisition date deferred revenue. In 2008, gross margin was adversely affected by purchase accounting adjustments aggregating $43.4 million which (i) increased cost of sales in the 2007 period for the increase in the recorded value of the Company’s Sale Transaction date inventories by $12.5$39.0 million to eliminate manufacturing profits inherent in the inventories at that date; (ii) increaseincreased depreciation expense by $271,000$1.9 million due to acquisition date fair value adjustments and (iii) reduced sales for the quarteryear by $676,000 related$2.5 million to eliminatingeliminate selling profits inherent in certain acquisition date deferred revenues. In 2008, gross margin was adversely affected by (i) increased depreciation expense of $516,000 related to fair value adjustments and (ii) eliminated selling profits inherent in certain deferred revenues which reduced sales for the quarter by $97,000.  IgnoringExcluding the purchase accounting adjustments, gross margin was 48.2%48.0% for the periodyear ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and 46.8%48.1% for the periodyear ended SeptemberJune 30, 2007.2008.

Three Months                  
Ended                  
September 30,    % of     % of     % of 
(In thousands) AMS  sales  ATS  sales  Total  sales 
                   
2008 $32,021   47.4% $35,338   48.2% $67,359   47.8%
2007 $25,815   38.3% $26,800   36.8% $52,615   37.5%
  Gross Profit 
Fiscal Year                  
Ended    % of     % of     % of 
June 30, AMS  Net Sales  ATS  Net Sales  Total  Net Sales 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
                   
2009 $134,239   46.7% $150,866   48.4% $285,105   47.6%
2008 $122,808   40.6% $144,590   42.5% $267,398   41.6%

Gross margins in the AMS segment were 47.4%46.7% in 20082009 and 38.3%40.6% in 2007.2008.  Gross profit in 2008 was negatively impacted by2009 included the effect of purchase accounting adjustments of $199,000 versus $7.3$796,000 as compared to $24.6 million in 2007. Ignoring2008. Excluding the purchase accounting adjustments, gross margins were 47.7%47.0% in 20082009 and 49.1%48.7% in 2007.2008.  The decrease in gross margins is principally attributable to lower sales ofdecreased margins in components and microelectronic modules and components, partially offset by a small increase in(i) increased sales of integrated circuitcircuits (which have margins which resulted from improved product mix.higher than the segment average) and (ii) decreased sales of components (which have margins lower than the segment average).

Gross margins in the ATS segment were 48.2%48.4% in 20082009 and 36.8%42.5% in 2007.2008. Gross profit in 20082009 was negatively impacted by purchase accounting adjustments of $413,000$2.3 million versus $6.1$18.9 million in 2007. Ignoring2008. Excluding the purchase accounting adjustments, gross margins were 48.7%49.0% in 20082009 and 44.7%47.6% in 2007.  Gross2008.  The increase in gross margins increasedis principally dueattributable to increased sales and margins of our wireless products and increased margins in ourfrequency synthesizers and synthetic test products due to product mix.partially offset by (i) increased sales of wireless products (which have margins lower than the segment average) and (ii) decreased sales of radio test products (which have margins higher than the segment average).

31

Selling, General and Administrative Costs.  Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) costs include office and management salaries, fringe benefits, commissions, insurance and professional fees, as well as, merger related expenses.  fees.

On a consolidated basis SGS,G&A costs decreased 47040 basis points as a percentage of sales from the quarterfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 to the quarterfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009.  Excluding merger related expenses ($634,000 in 2008 and $3.54.3 million in 2007)2009 and $5.4 million in 2008), stock compensation costs ($489,000 in 2008 and $1.92.0 million in 2007)2009 and $3.3 million in 2008), acquisition related depreciation expense ($1.2 million in 2009 and $1.3 million in 2008), restructuring costs ($1.6686,000 in 2009 and $3.7 million in 2007)2008) and a one-time lease termination cost ($575,000576,000 in 2007) the decrease2008), S,G&A was 20 basis points as a percentage of sales.

38
$120.3 million in 2009 and $125.8 million in 2008.

Three Months                     
Ended                     
September 30,    % of     % of        % of 
(In thousands) AMS  sales  ATS  sales  Corporate  Total  sales 
                      
2008 $10,362   15.3% $17,248   23.5% $3,874  $31,484   22.4%
2007 $10,380   15.4% $19,396   26.6% $8,239  $38,015   27.1%
  Selling, General and Administrative Costs 
Fiscal Year
Ended
June 30,
 AMS  
% of
Net Sales
  ATS  
% of
Net Sales
  Corporate  Total  
% of
Net Sales
 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
                      
2009 $41,822   14.5% $68,700   22.0% $17,834  $128,356   21.4%
2008 $42,513   14.0% $78,128   22.9% $19,476  $140,117   21.8%

Selling, general and administrative costs remained relatively unchanged inIn the AMS segment.  Selling,segment, selling, general and administrative costs decreased $2.1$691,000, or 2%.  As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative costs increased 50 basis points for AMS.  Excluding restructuring costs ($272,000 in 2008), stock compensation costs ($57,000 in 2008), acquisition related depreciation expense ($39,000 in 2009 and $42,000 in 2008), S,G&A was $41.8 million or 11%, in 2009 and $42.1 million in 2008.

In the ATS segment, selling, general and administrative costs decreased $9.4 million, or 12%, largely due to reductions in restructuring costs ($1.6 million) and one time lease termination fees ($575,000) incurred(incurred in 2007.2008) combined with cost savings related to the closing of our Burnham facility.  As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative costs decreased 90 basis points for ATS.  Excluding restructuring costs ($686,000 in 2009 and $3.5 million in 2008), a one-time lease termination cost of $576,000 in 2008, stock compensation costs ($89,000 favorable impact in 2008), acquisition related depreciation expense ($913,000 in 2009 and $1.0 million in 2008), S,G&A was $67.1 million in 2009 and $73.1 million in 2008.

Corporate general and administrative expenses decreased $4.4$1.6 million, primarily due to reductions inor 8%.  As a percentage of sales, corporate general and administrative expenses remained relatively unchanged.  Excluding merger related expenses ($2.9 million)4.3 million in 2009 and stock-based compensation ($1.4 million).

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 10 basis points, as a percentage of sales, for AMS and decreased 310 basis points for ATS. Ignoring the restructuring costs$5.4 million in 2007 ($1.6 million) and one-time lease termination costs in 2007 ($575,000)2008), the decrease for ATS was 10 basis points. Corporate general and administrative expenses decreased 310 basis points as a percentage of consolidated sales and excluding the merger related expenses and stock compensation costs the decrease($2.0 million in 2009 and $3.3 million in 2008) and acquisition related depreciation expense ($220,000 in 2009 and $192,000 in 2008), S,G&A was 10 basis points.$11.4 million in 2009 and $10.5 million in 2008.

Research and Development Costs. Research and development costs include materials, engineering labor and allocated overhead.

On a consolidated basis, research and development expensescosts decreased 410110 basis points as a percentage of sales.

Three Months                  
Ended                  
September 30,    % of     % of     % of 
(In thousands) AMS  sales  ATS  sales  Total  sales 
                   
2008 $7,331   10.8% $9,698   13.2% $17,029   12.1%
2007 $7,626   11.3% $15,032   20.6% $22,658   16.2%
  Research and Development Costs 
Fiscal Year                  
Ended    % of     % of     % of 
June 30, AMS  Net Sales  ATS  Net Sales  Total  Net Sales 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
                   
2009 $30,192   10.5% $39,914   12.8% $70,106   11.7%
2008 $30,865   10.2% $51,211   15.0% $82,076   12.8%

          ��       AMS segment self-funded research and development costs decreased $295,000,$673,000, or 4%2%, primarily due to a shift in resources to focuslower spending on manufacturing efforts for integrated circuit products.microelectronic modules.  As a percentage of sales, research and development costs decreased 50increased 30 basis points.

ATS segment self-funded research and development costs decreased $5.3$11.3 million, or 35%22%, primarily due to (i) a reduction of $2.1$10.3 million in our wireless business due to cost savings related to the closing of our Burnham facility and a reduction of wireless related projects and (ii) a reduction of $5.5 million in restructuring costs primarily in the UK, combined with reductions related to the completionour wireless business partially offset by increased costs of the TM500c project and eHSPA product development costs$5.1 million, aimed at enhancing existing next generation products in the wireless business.our radio test division.

32
Acquired In-Process Research and Development Costs.  During the quarterfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and in connection with the Company Sale Transaction, we recorded and immediately expensed $24.3 million of acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) costs ($15.7 million in the AMS segment and $8.6 million in the ATS segment).  There were no comparableAdditionally, in 2009 and 2008, we recorded and expensed $1.7 million and $635,000, respectively, of IPR&D costs related to our acquisition of Gaisler (AMS segment) in June 2008 based on the current quarter.final allocation of the purchase price.

Restructuring costs.Costs.  The AMS segment incurred total restructuring costs of $414,000 ($107,000 in cost of sales, $272,000 in S,G&A and $35,000 in R&D), in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 which relate to severance for personnel reductions at our Whippany, New Jersey components manufacturing facility.

The ATS segment incurred restructuring costs of $402,000$4.1 million in the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 ($306,0002.9 million in cost of sales, $32,000$686,000 in S,G&A and $64,000$496,000 in R&D) related to further consolidation and reorganization efforts in our UK operations..  In comparison, in the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20072008, the CompanyATS segment incurred total restructuring costs of $3.8$10.4 million ($1.6880,000 in cost of sales, $3.5 million in S,G&A and $2.2$6.0 million in R&D), which.  In both periods, the costs also relaterelated to consolidation and reorganization efforts in our UKU.K. operations.

Amortization of Acquired Intangibles.  Amortization of acquired intangibles increased $5.8decreased $11.8 million in 20082009 primarily due to backlog recorded in the new basisAcquisition becoming fully amortized during the first quarter of our intangible assets that was establishedfiscal 2009.  The amortization decreased $7.7 million in connection with the Company Sale Transaction on August 15, 2007. The AMS segment increasedand decreased $4.1 million andin the ATS segment increased $1.7 million.segment.

Impairment of Goodwill and Intangibles. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual impairment test of goodwill and intangible assets.  Due to a decline in the RFMW reporting unit’s operating results in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and additional revisions to internal forecasts, we recorded impairment charges to both goodwill and tradenames with indefinite lives related to the RFMW reporting unit of $35.2 million and $6.0 million, respectively.  There were no similar impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2008.

Company Sale Transaction Expenses.  In the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2007,2008, we incurred Company Sale Transaction expenses of $34.0$36.2 million, consisting primarily of mergerAcquisition related change of control, severance and other compensation payments, a break-up fee and its related lawsuit settlement charge and legal and other professional fees.  There were no comparable costs in the current quarter.fiscal 2009.

39

Other Income (Expense).  Interest expense was $21.2$83.8 million in the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and $11.4$74.9 million in the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2007.2008. The increase is due to interest expense incurred for an additional one and a half months during fiscal year 2009 related to the addition of $870$870.0 million of debt to finance the purchase of the Companyissued on August 15, 2007. Other income (expense) of $3.1$11.0 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009 consisted primarily of $9.0 million of foreign currency transaction gains and $1.5 million of interest income.  Other income (expense) of $4.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 consisted primarily of $2.3$2.5 million of foreign currency transaction gains and $741,000$2.1 million of interest income and other miscellaneous income, net. Other income (expense) of $39,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 consisted primarily of $517,000 of interest income, partially offset by $299,000 of other miscellaneous expenses and $179,000 of foreign currency losses.income.

Provision for Income Taxes. The income tax benefit was $10.4$15.3 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, an effective income tax rate of 60.0%16.7%.  We had an income tax benefit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 of $26.0$45.8 million, an effective income tax rate of 28.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2007.28.5%. The effective income tax rate for the twoboth periods differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate to income before income taxes primarily due to foreign, state and local income taxes and, for 2009, the tax benefit was decreased by $11.1 million for a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge, and for 2008, the tax benefit was increased for the utilization of certain foreign net operating loss carry forwards and, for 2007, the tax benefit was decreased by $5.9 million for the impact of certain Company Sale Transaction expenses that were not deductible for tax purposes, as well as by $8.7 million nondeductible IPR&D.  WeIn the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, we paid income taxes of $2.1$3.6 million and received a tax refund of $2.3 million and in the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008, and $814,000 inwe paid income taxes of $8.0 million.  In May 2008, we received a federal income tax refund of $27.1 million related to the three months ended September 30,carryback of tax losses for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, to fiscal years 2006 and 2007.

Income (loss) from Continuing Operations.  The loss from continuing operations was $6.9$76.7 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and $63.9$115.0 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2007.  The loss from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was adversely affected by an increase in interest expense of $9.8 million and an increase in intangible amortization of $5.8 million.  The loss from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was adversely affected by $37.5 million of Company Sale Transaction and related expenses (including $3.5 million reported in S,G&A), restructuring charges of $3.8 million, purchase accounting adjustments to inventory, depreciation and deferred revenue totaling $13.7 million and an IPR&D charge of $24.3 million.2008.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007
 
Net Sales.  Net sales increased 8% to $643.2 million in fiscal 2008 from $593.1 million in fiscal 2007.

 
33

Net sales in the AMS segment increased 14% to $302.7 million in fiscal 2008 from $266.5 million in fiscal 2007 primarily due to sales from our acquisition of MicroMetrics in April 2007 ($9.8 million), and increased sales volume of components (primarily increased demand for customer voice over IP products and isolators), integrated products and motion control products, partially offset by reductions in sales of cellular communications products.  Net sales in the ATS segment increased 4% to $340.5 million in fiscal 2008, which includes a reduction of $2.5 million for the current period impact of purchase accounting adjustments to deferred revenue, from $326.6 million in fiscal 2007 primarily due to an increase in PXI sales, partially offset by reduced sales in wireless due to market saturation of certain products and the anticipation of emerging new technologies.
 
Gross Profit.  Gross profit equals net sales less cost of sales. Cost of sales includes materials, direct labor, amortization of capitalized software development costs and overhead expenses such as engineering labor, fringe benefits, depreciation, allocable occupancy costs and manufacturing supplies.
On a consolidated basis, gross margin was 41.6% in fiscal 2008 and 47.9% in fiscal 2007. The reduction in gross margin resulted from the impact of purchase accounting adjustments aggregating $43.4 million in 2008 which (i) increased the value of the Company’s Sale Transaction date inventories by $39.0 million to eliminate manufacturing profits inherent in the inventories at that date; (ii) record Acquisitionacquisition related depreciation of $1.9 million; and (iii) reduced sales by $2.5 million to eliminate selling profits inherent in certain deferred revenues. IgnoringExcluding the purchase accounting adjustments, gross margin in fiscal 2008 was 48.1%. The purchase accounting adjustments related to depreciation and deferred revenues will impact gross margins through 2038 and 2014, respectively. However, the effect of the purchase accounting adjustments to inventory has been fully recognized at June 30, 2008 and, therefore, future gross margins are expected to return to pre-Company Sale Transaction levels.

40
 
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
 
AMS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
ATS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
Total
  
% of
Net Sales
 
 Gross Profit 
Fiscal Year                  
Ended    % of     % of     % of 
June 30, AMS  Net Sales  ATS  Net Sales  Total  Net Sales 
 (In thousands, except percentages) 
 (In thousands, except percentages)                   
2008 $122,808   40.6% $144,590   42.5% $267,398   41.6% $122,808   40.6% $144,590   42.5% $267,398   41.6%
2007 $133,863   50.2% $150,314   46.0% $284,177   47.9% $133,863   50.2% $150,314   46.0% $284,177   47.9%
 
Gross profit in the AMS segment decreased $11.1 million, or 8%, as the additional gross profit generated by the MicroMetrics acquisition ($3.4 million) and increased sales volumes related to components (largely voice over IP equipment and isolators), integrated products and motion control products were more than offset by the effect of purchase accounting adjustments to inventory ($23.9 million) and depreciation ($708,000). The aforementioned increase in sales had a favorable impact to gross profit; however a change in sales mix combined with the impact of the purchase accounting adjustments to inventory and depreciation reduced gross margins to 40.6% in fiscal 2008 from 50.2% in fiscal 2007. IgnoringExcluding the purchase accounting adjustments, the gross margin in fiscal 2008 was 48.7%.

Gross profit in the ATS segment decreased $5.7 million, or 4%, as the additional gross profit generated by higher sales volumes was more than offset by the effect of purchase accounting adjustments that aggregated $18.9 million. The ATS sales increase and a change in sales mix had a favorable impact to gross profit; however, the unfavorable impacts of purchase accounting adjustments to inventory ($15.2 million), depreciation ($1.2 million) and deferred revenue ($2.5 million) reduced gross margins to 42.5% in fiscal 2008 from 46.0% in fiscal 2007. IgnoringExcluding the purchase accounting adjustments, the gross margin in fiscal 2008 was 47.6%.

Selling, General and Administrative Costs.  Selling, general and administrative costs include office and management salaries, fringe benefits, commissions, insurance and professional fees.  On a consolidated basis, these costs decreased 10 basis points as a percentage of sales. Excluding merger related expenses included in selling, general and administrative costs, the decrease was 40 basis points as a percentage of sales.
 
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
 
AMS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
ATS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
Corporate
  
Total
  
% of
Net Sales
 
 Selling, General and Administrative Costs 
Fiscal Year                     
Ended    % of     % of        % of 
June 30, AMS  Net Sales  ATS  Net Sales  Corporate  Total  Net Sales 
 (In thousands, except percentages) 
 (In thousands, except percentages)                      
2008 $42,513   14.0% $78,128   22.9% $19,476  $140,117   21.8% $42,513   14.0% $78,128   22.9% $19,476  $140,117   21.8%
2007 $42,447   15.9% $67,286   20.6% $19,888  $129,621   21.9% $42,447   15.9% $67,286   20.6% $19,888  $129,621   21.9%

Selling, general and administrative costs remained relatively unchanged in the AMS segment, as an increase due to the acquisition of MicroMetrics ($2.1 million), was offset by lower employee related expenses in other parts of the AMS segment. Selling, general and administrative costs increased $10.8 million, or 16%, in the ATS segment primarily as a result of increases in sales and marketing costs associated with the sales organization structure in the Asia Pacific region combined with an initiative to further develop revenue opportunities for certain radio test set products and a $3.4 million increase in restructuring costs in the U.K.

34
 
Corporate general and administrative expenses decreased $413,000$412,000 due primarily to lower employee related expenses and professional fees of nearly $5.8 million, partially offset by an increase due to Company Sale Transaction related expenses of $5.4 million, of which $2.1 million is for advisory fees to the Sponsors that will continue to be paid until at least 2013.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 190 basis points, as a percentage of sales, for AMS and due largely to increased restructuring costs, increased 230 basis points for ATS. Corporate general and administrative expenses decreased 30 basis points as a percentage of consolidated sales and excluding the merger related expenses, the decrease was 117 basis points.
 
Research and Development Costs.  Research and development costs include materials, engineering labor and allocated overhead. On a consolidated basis, research and development expenses remained relatively unchanged as a percentage of sales.
 
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
 
AMS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
ATS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
Total
  
% of
Net Sales
 
 Research and Development Costs 
Fiscal Year                  
Ended    % of     % of     % of 
June 30, AMS  Net Sales  ATS  Net Sales  Total  Net Sales 
 (In thousands, except percentages) 
 (In thousands, except percentages)                   
2008 $30,865   10.2% $51,211   15.0% $82,076   12.8% $30,865   10.2% $51,211   15.0% $82,076   12.8%
2007 $28,473   10.7% $48,244   14.8% $76,717   12.9% $28,473   10.7% $48,244   14.8% $76,717   12.9%
 
AMS segment self-funded research and development costs increased $2.4 million, or 8%, primarily due to development of new technologies for integrated circuit products and for standard product development in microelectronics.  As a percentage of sales, research and development costs decreased 50 basis points.
41

ATS segment self-funded research and development costs increased $3.0 million, or 6%, primarily due to restructuring costs related to further consolidation and reorganization efforts in the UK,U.K., combined with increases in wireless eHSPA new product development costs and radio test product development and design.  As a percentage of sales, research and development costs increased 20 basis points.

Acquired In-Process Research and Development Costs.  In connection with the Company Sale Transaction we recorded and immediately expensed $24.3 million of acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”)&D costs in fiscal 2008 ($15.7 million in the AMS segment and $8.6 million in the ATS segment). Also in fiscal 2008, in connection with the acquisition of Gaisler Research, AB, we allocated $635,000 of the purchase price to IPR&D. There were no comparable costs in fiscal 2007.

Restructuring costs.  The AMS segment incurred restructuring costs of $414,000 in fiscal 2008 ($107,000 in cost of sales, $272,000 in S,G&A and $35,000 in R&D) related to severance for personnel reductions within its IP products division. Restructuring costs in ATS of $10.4 million ($880,000 in cost of sales, $3.5 million in S,G&A and $6.0 million in R&D) relate to further consolidation and reorganization efforts in our UKU.K. operations. In comparison, in fiscal 2007 we incurred total restructuring costs of $2.8 million, all of which was reported in the ATS segment as R&D expense.
 
Amortization of Acquired Intangibles.  Amortization of acquired intangibles increased $61.8 million in fiscal 2008 due to the new basis of our intangible assets that was established in connection with the Company Sale Transaction. The AMS segment increased $42.5 million and the ATS segment increased $19.3 million.
 
Sale Transaction Expenses.  In fiscal 2008 and 2007, we incurred Company Sale Transaction expenses of $36.2 million and $30.6 million, respectively, consisting primarily of merger related change of control, severance and other compensation payments, a break-up fee and its related lawsuit settlement charge and legal and other professional fees.
 
Other Income (Expense).  Interest expense was $74.9 million in fiscal 2008 and $672,000 in fiscal 2007. The increase is due to the addition of $870 million of debt to finance the sale of the Company.  Other income (expense) of $4.9 million in fiscal 2008 consisted primarily of $2.5 million of foreign currency gains and $2.4 million of interest income and other miscellaneous income, net. Other income (expense) of $152,000 in fiscal 2007 consisted primarily of $876,000 of interest income and $576,000 of other miscellaneous income, net, partially offset by $1.3 million of foreign currency losses.

 
35

Provision for Income Taxes. The income tax benefit was $45.8 million, an effective income tax rate of 28.5%, in fiscal 2008.  In fiscal 2007 we had income tax expense of $24.9 million, an effective income tax rate of 73.9%. The effective income tax rate for the two periods differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate to income before income taxes primarily due to foreign, state and local income taxes and the impact of certain Company Sale Transaction expenses that were not deductible for tax purposes in fiscal 2008 and 2007, as well as nondeductible IPR&D in fiscal 2008. We paid income taxes of $8.0 million in fiscal 2008 and $28.8 million in fiscal 2007. In May 2008, we received a federal income tax refund of $27.1 million related to the carryback of tax losses for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, to fiscal years 2006 and 2007.
 
Income (loss) from Continuing Operations.  The loss from continuing operations in fiscal 2008 was $115.0 million versus income of $8.8 million in fiscal 2007. Income (loss) from continuing operations in fiscal 2008 was adversely affected by the following pre-tax items: $41.6 million of Company Sale Transaction and related expenses (including $5.4 million reported in SGS,G&A), an increase in interest expense of $74.3 million, an increase in restructuring charges of $7.9 million, the current period impact of purchase accounting adjustments to inventory, depreciation and deferred revenue totaling $45.6 million, an IPR&D charge of $25.0 million, and an increase in intangible asset amortization of $61.8 million. Income (loss) from continuing operations in fiscal 2007 was adversely affected by $30.6 million of Company Sale Transaction expenses.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2006
Net Sales.  Net sales increased 9% to $593.1 million in fiscal 2007 from $546.2 million in fiscal 2006. On a consolidated basis, organic growth (defined as net sales for business units in operation throughout fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006) was 8%.
Net sales in the AMS segment increased 10% to $266.5 million in fiscal 2007 from $241.4 million in fiscal 2006 due to increased sales volume of components, integrated circuits and microelectronic modules. Organic growth in AMS was 9% with the balance due to the addition of sales from our fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 acquisition of MicroMetrics. Net sales in the ATS segment increased 7% to $326.6 million in fiscal 2007 from $304.8 million in fiscal 2006 due to increased volume in radio test.
42
Gross Profit.  On a consolidated basis, gross profit was 47.9% in fiscal 2007 and 48.0% in fiscal 2006.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
 
AMS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
ATS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
Total
  
% of
Net Sales
 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
2007 $133,863   50.2% $150,314   46.0% $284,177   47.9%
2006 $120,492   49.9% $141,439   46.4% $261,931   48.0%
Gross profit increased $13.4 million, or 11%, and gross margin increased 30 basis points to 50.2% in the AMS segment primarily as a result of the aforementioned increased sales volume and increased margins in our components and microelectronic modules. Gross profit increased $8.9 million, or 6%, in the ATS segment primarily as a result of the increased sales volume in radio test.
Selling, General and Administrative Costs.  On a consolidated basis, these costs decreased 60 basis points as a percentage of sales.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
 
AMS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
ATS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
Corporate
  
Total
  
% of
Net Sales
 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
2007 $42,447   15.9% $67,286   20.6% $19,888  $129,621   21.9%
2006 $38,540   16.0% $65,619   21.5% $18,712  $122,871   22.5%
Selling, general and administrative costs increased $3.9 million, or 10%, in the AMS segment due primarily to a general increase in expenses related to the increase in sales as well as additional expense for MicroMetrics ($646,000), which was acquired during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. As a percentage of sales, AMS selling, general and administrative costs decreased 10 basis points. Selling, general and administrative costs increased $1.7 million, or 3%, in the ATS segment primarily as a result of a general increase in expense related to the increase in sales. The ATS segment benefited from restructuring efforts in the U.K. in fiscal 2006. As a percentage of sales, ATS selling, general and administrative costs decreased 90 basis points. Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.2 million due primarily to increases in compensation related expenses partially offset by reduced professional fees and share based compensation.
In fiscal 2006, we initiated steps to consolidate three of our United Kingdom operations into one division in our ATS segment. Pursuant to the plan, our manufacturing operations were moved into one facility and we created a shared-services environment for all finance and administrative functions. In connection with this plan, approximately 40 employees were terminated and certain contract positions were eliminated. In fiscal 2006, we recorded charges of $3.2 million primarily for workforce reductions in all departments. During fiscal 2007, we recorded an additional charge of $100,000 for these workforce reductions. The workforce restructuring charges were allocated solely to general and administrative costs.
Research and Development Costs.  On a consolidated basis, research and development expenses decreased 30 basis points as a percentage of sales.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
 
AMS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
ATS
  
% of
Net Sales
  
Total
  
% of
Net Sales
 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
2007 $28,473   10.7% $48,244   14.8% $76,717   12.9%
2006 $24,974   10.3% $47,081   15.4% $72,055   13.2%
Self-funded research and development costs increased $3.5 million, or 14%, in the AMS segment primarily due to the increased development of microelectronic modules and integrated circuits. Research and development costs increased $1.2 million, or 2%, in the ATS segment primarily as a result of restructuring charges of $2.8 million in our Wireless division, partially offset by a general reduction in spending for research and development.
In fiscal 2007, we initiated and completed restructuring activity in our wireless business in the United Kingdom. Pursuant to the plan, 23 employees were terminated, resulting in $1.4 million of severance costs, and certain contract positions were eliminated. We also abandoned a leased facility and recorded a fixed asset impairment charge, which in the aggregate amounted to $1.3 million.
Amortization of Acquired Intangibles.  Amortization decreased $772,000, or 6%, to $13.0 million, as a result of certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.

43
Company Sale Transaction Expenses.  On March 2, 2007, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “terminated merger agreement”) to be acquired by investment entities affiliated with General Atlantic LLC (“General Atlantic”) and Francisco Partners II, L.P. (“Francisco Partners”). The terminated merger agreement contained a provision which stated that in the event we accepted a superior proposal, a breakup fee would be payable by us. On May 25, 2007, we entered into the merger agreement with the parent. The Acquisition was consummated on August 15, 2007.  In fiscal 2007 we incurred $30.6 million of Company Sale Transaction expenses, including $22.5 million for the breakup fee.
Other Income (Expense).  Interest expense was $672,000 in fiscal 2007 and $608,000 in fiscal 2006. Other income of $152,000 in fiscal 2007 consisted primarily of $876,000 of interest income and $567,000 other miscellaneous income, partially offset by $1.3 million of foreign currency losses. Other income of $1.7 million in fiscal 2006 consisted primarily of $1.1 million of interest income. The decline in interest income was due to the lower balances in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities primarily due to $17.2 million of stock repurchases and $9.2 million paid for the settlement of the earnout in connection with our acquisition of Racal Instruments Wireless Solutions Group (“RIWS”).
In connection with the Acquisition and the terminated merger agreement, through June 30, 2007 we incurred sale transaction expenses of $30.6 million, including a breakup fee of $22.5 million in the aggregate to General Atlantic and Francisco Partners, which we expensed as incurred in the fiscal 2007 consolidated statement of earnings. The remainder of such expenses primarily consisted of legal and other professional fees.
Provision for Income Taxes.  The income tax provision was $24.9 million (an effective income tax rate of 73.9%) in fiscal 2007 and $20.5 million (an effective income tax rate of 37.8%) in fiscal 2006. The effective income tax rate for the two periods differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate to income before income taxes primarily due to foreign, state and local income taxes and, for the year ended June 30, 2007, the impact of $30.6 million of Company Sale Transaction expenses, which were not deductible for tax purposes. We paid $28.8 million during fiscal 2007 and $25.7 million during fiscal 2006 for income taxes.
Income from Continuing Operations.  Income from continuing operations for fiscal 2007 was $8.8 million, versus $33.7 million in fiscal 2006. Fiscal 2007 income from continuing operations was adversely affected by $30.6 million of non-tax deductible merger related expenses.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle.  We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (FIN 47) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. The adoption of FIN 47 resulted in the recognition of a fixed asset and asset retirement obligation liability for certain leased premises of $2.4 million each, accumulated depreciation of $1.6 million and an after tax charge of $1.1 million, which is reflected as a cumulative change in accounting principle in our fiscal 2006 consolidated statement of earnings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we had $73.1$57.7 million of cash and cash equivalents $216.2, $221.4 million in working capital and our current ratio was 2.5 to 1.  As of June 30, 2008, we had $54.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, $220.9 million in working capital and our current ratio was 2.4 to 1.

At SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, our marketable securities consisted primarily of $19.9$17.7 million of auction rate securities.securities, net of a $2.3 million valuation allowance. Auction rate securities represent long-term (generally maturities of ten years to thirty-five years from the date of issuance) variable rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates that are reset through an auction process, which occurs every seven to thirty-five days, and are classified as available for sale securities. All but one (with the one security having a carrying value of $1.9$1.7 million and a AAan A rating) of our auction rate securities retain a triple-A rating by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. In addition, certain of our auction rate securities are backed by student loans whose principal and interest are federally guaranteed by the Family Federal Education Loan Program.  We have redeemed $26.5 million of auction rate securities at par since February 8, 2008.

Given the high credit quality of our auction rate securities and our intent and ability to hold these securities until liquidity returns to the market or maturity, if necessary, we believe we will recover the full principal amount of $19.9 million, in the future. However, at SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we concluded that the fair value of our auction rate securities was $18.7$17.7 million. Since many auctions are failing and given that there is currently no active secondary market for our investment in auction rate securities, the determination of fair value was based on the following:following factors:

·       continuing illiquidity;
·       lack of action by the issuers to establish different forms of financing to replace or redeem these securities; and

44

·       the credit quality of the underlying securities.

Should credit market disruptions continue or increase in magnitude, we may be required to record a further impairment on our investments or consider that an ultimate liquidity event may take longer than currently anticipated.

Auction rate securities are classified as non-current assets in the accompanying September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008 consolidated balance sheets.

Our principal liquidity requirements are to service our debt and interest and meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we had $881.4$889.3 million of debt outstanding (of which $875.8$883.8 million iswas long-term), including approximately $519.8$515.8 million under our senior secured credit facility, $225.0 million of senior unsecured debt under our unsecured senior credit facilitynotes (i.e. the Original Notes) and $135.2$147.5 million under our senior subordinated unsecured credit facility, including paid-in-kind interest. Additionally, at SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 we were able to borrow an additional $50.0 million under the revolving portion of our senior secured credit facility.


36
The following is a summary of required principal repayments of long-termour debt for the next five years and thereafter as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008:2009:

Year ended June 30, (In thousands) 
2010 $5,590 
2011  5,610 
2012  5,635 
2013  5,250 
2014  5,250 
Thereafter  862,013 
Total $889,348 
Twelve months ended
September 30,
 (In thousands) 
2009 $5,570 
2010  5,590 
2011  5,610 
2012  5,635 
2013  5,250 
Thereafter  853,728 
Total $881,383 

As of SeptemberJune 30, 3008,2009, we are in compliance with all of the covenants contained in our loan agreements. Certain loan covenants are based on Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (net income (loss) from continuing operations before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization), adjusted to add back certain non-cash, non-recurring and other items, as required by various covenants in our debt agreements.  Our use of the term Adjusted EBITDA may vary from others in our industry.  EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA isare not a measuremeasures of operating income (loss), performance or liquidity under U.S. GAAP and isare subject to important limitations.  For additional information regarding our use of Adjusted EBITDA and limitations on its usefulness as an analytical tool, see “Use of Non-GAAP Measures.”  A reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations, which is a U.S. GAAP measure of our operating results, to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in our debt agreements, is as follows:

  Year Ended  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  June 30, 2007 
     Combined    
     Predecessor and    
  Successor Entity  Successor Entities  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
          
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(76,688) $(115,012) $8,794 
Interest expense  83,823   74,933   672 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (15,332)  (45,758)  24,935 
Depreciation and amortization  84,426   96,694   30,142 
EBITDA  76,229   10,857   64,543 
             
Non-cash purchase accounting adjustments  2,749   66,510     
Company sale transaction expenses and            
   merger related expenses  4,283   41,621   30,584 
Restructuring costs (a)
  4,102   10,773   2,840 
Share based compensation (b)
  1,955   3,337   4,084 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  41,225   -   - 
Other defined items (c)
  14,797   1,979   18,133 
Adjusted EBITDA $145,340  $135,077  $120,184 
(a)Primarily reflects costs associated with the reorganization of our U.K. operations.
(b)Reflects non-cash share-based compensation expense under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payments.
(c)Reflects other adjustments required in calculating our debt covenant compliance such as pro forma Adjusted EBITDA for companies acquired during the year and other non-cash charges.
 
4537
 


  Year Ended  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
   June 30, 2008  September 30, 2007  September 30, 2008 
   Combined Predecessor and    
   Successor Entities  Successor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
          
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(115,012) $(63,944) $(6,897)
Interest expense  74,933   11,411   21,215 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (45,758)  (26,000)  (10,354)
Depreciation and amortization  96,694   16,964   23,497 
EBITDA (unaudited)  10,857   (61,569)  27,461 
Impact of non-cash purchase accounting            
   adjustments for inventory  39,025   12,457   - 
Non-cash purchase accounting adjustments            
   for in-process research and development  24,975   24,340   - 
Impact of other non-cash purchase accounting            
   adjustments  2,510   676   97 
Company sale transaction expenses and merger            
   related expenses  41,621   37,513   634 
Restructuring costs (a)  10,773   3,809   402 
Share based compensation (b)  3,337   1,871   489 
Other defined items (c)  1,979   -   - 
Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited) $135,077  $19,097  $29,083 
Financial covenants in the senior secured credit facility include (i) a maximum leverage ratio of total debt (less up to $15 million of cash) to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, and (ii) maximum consolidated capital expenditures.   The maximum leverage ratio permitted for June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 7.60 and 8.70, respectively, whereas our actual leverage ratio was 6.02 and 6.40, respectively.  For fiscal 2010 and 2011 the maximum leverage ratio permitted decreases to 6.80 and 5.90, respectively.  The maximum consolidated capital expenditures permitted for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2010 is $25.0 million.  Our actual capital expenditures were $18.7 million, $14.3 million and $18.4 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  For fiscal year 2011 and thereafter, the maximum annual consolidated capital expenditures permitted increases to $30.0 million.  We believe we will continue to be in compliance with the leverage ratio and capital expenditure limitations, as defined by the financial covenant terms in our term loan agreements, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.

(a)    Primarily reflects costs associated with the reorganization of our U.K. operations.
(b)    Reflects non-cash share-based employee compensation expense under the provisions of SFAS 123(R),
         Share-Based Payments.
(c)    Reflects other adjustments required in calculating our debt covenant compliance.

We expect that cash generated from operating activities and availability under the revolving portion of the senior secured credit facility will be our principal sources of liquidity. Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund working capital needs and planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, including those resulting from the current global recession and continued credit tightening, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control. Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our senior secured credit facility will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. We cannot assure you, however, that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or those future borrowings will be available to us under our senior secured credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before the maturity thereof. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Cash Flows
 
For the three months ended September 30, 2008,fiscal 2009, our cash flow provided by continuing operations was $28.5$54.5 million.  Our investing activities from continuing operations used cash of $3.3$36.2 million, primarily for $3.3payments for the purchase of businesses, (net of cash acquired) of $18.9 million, and for capital expenditures of capital expenditures.$18.7 million. Our financing activities used cash of $1.8$5.9 million, primarily to repay indebtedness ($1.3 million).$5.6 million of indebtedness.

For fiscal 2008, our cash flow from continuing operations was $26.0 million. Our investing activities from continuing operations used cash of $1.2 billion, primarily for payments of $1.1 billion to predecessor shareholders and option holders, $14.3 million of capital expenditures, purchase of a business (net of cash acquired) of $11.1 million and the purchase (net of sales) of marketable securities of $10.5 million. Our financing activities provided cash of $1.2 billion, primarily from borrowings under our credit facilities of $870.0 million on August 15, 2007 and proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $378.4 million, also on August 15, 2007.

In fiscal 2007, our cash flow from continuing operations provided $22.5 million, primarily from our continued profitability offset by increases in accounts receivable ($19.9 million) and inventory ($7.9 million) due to increased sales. In fiscal 2007, our investing activities from continuing operations used cash of $19.0 million, principally for the purchase of MicroMetrics ($10.7 million), the contingent payment in the final determination of the RIWS acquisition amount ($9.2 million), and capital expenditures ($18.4 million), partially offset by the proceeds from the sale of marketable securities net(net of purchasespurchases) ($18.8 million). In fiscal 2007, our financing activities from continuing operations used $793,000, principally due tofor the purchase of treasury stock ($17.2 million), partially offset by the proceeds from the exercise of stock options ($14.2 million).

46

In fiscal 2006, our cash flow from continuing operations provided $41.3 million, primarily from our continued profitability offset by increases in accounts receivable ($23.9 million) and inventory ($9.0 million) due to increased sales. In fiscal 2006, our investing activities from continuing operations used cash of $42.4 million, principally for net purchases of marketable securities ($28.3 million) and capital expenditures ($15.4 million).  In fiscal 2006, our financing activities provided $3.7 million, principally from the proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures were $3.3$18.7 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2008.  Capital expenditures were $14.3 million $18.4 million and $15.4$18.4 million in fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, and fiscal 2006, respectively.  Our capital expenditures primarily consist of equipment replacements.


38
Contractual Obligations
 
The following table summarizes our obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt, and other obligations as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008, assuming the issuance of the Notes as of September 30, 2008:2009:

Payments Due By Period (1) 

 (In millions) 
Payments Due By Period (1)
Payments Due By Period (1)
 
                (In millions) 
    Less Than        After     Less Than        After 
 Total  1 Year  1 - 3 Years  4 - 5 Years  5 Years  Total  1 Year  1 - 3 Years  4 - 5 Years  5 Years 
                              
Senior secured credit facility $519.8  $5.3  $10.5  $10.5  $493.5  $515.8  $5.2  $10.5  $10.5  $489.6 
Senior subordinated unsecured credit facility  225.0   -   -   -   225.0 
Senior unsecured notes  225.0   -   -   -   225.0 
Subordinated unsecured credit facility  135.2   -   -   -   135.2   147.5   -   -   -   147.5 
Other long-term debt  1.4   0.3   0.7   0.4   -   1.0   0.3   0.7   -   - 
Operating leases (2)  13.5   4.3   6.4   2.6   0.2   20.5   6.9   9.1   3.4   1.1 
Employment agreements  7.6   3.1   3.4   1.1   -   9.7   4.5   4.6   0.6   - 
Advisory fee (3)  11.5   2.2   4.4   4.4   0.5   9.7   2.2   4.3   3.2   - 
Total $914.0  $15.2  $25.4  $19.0  $854.4  $929.2  $19.1  $29.2  $17.7  $863.2 

(1)Amounts do not include interest payments.

(2)The Company does not expect any future minimum sub-lease rentals associated with operating lease commitments shown in the above table.

(3)The annual advisory fee is payable to our Sponsors throughout the term of an advisory agreement, which has an initial term expiring on December 31, 2013 and is automatically renewable for additional one year terms thereafter unless terminated. For purposes of this table we have assumed that such agreement terminates December 31, 2013. The annual fee will be the greater of $2.2 million or 1.8% of adjustedAdjusted EBITDA for the prior fiscal year, as defined in the agreement.

In the normal course of business, we routinely enter into binding and non-binding purchase obligations primarily covering anticipated purchases of inventory and equipment. None of these obligations are individually significant. We do not expect that these commitments, as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, will have a material adverse affect on our liquidity.

Qualitative and Quantitative Information About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk.  We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with borrowings under our senior secured credit facility.  Although we currently have interest rate swap agreements hedging portions of this debt, these will expire before the borrowings are fully repaid. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we have $519.8$515.8 million outstanding under the term-loan portion of our senior secured credit facility, some ofthe un-hedged portion which is subject to variable interest rates. Each change of 0.125%1% in interest rates would result in a $40,000$584,000 change in our annual interest expense on the un-hedged portion of the term-loan borrowings and a $63,000$500,000 change in our annual interest expense on the revolving loan borrowings, assuming the entire $50.0 million was outstanding.  Any debt we incur in the future may also bear interest at floating rates.

47

Foreign Currency Risk.   Foreign currency contracts are used to protect us from exchange rate fluctuation from the time customers are invoiced in local currency until such currency is exchanged for U.S. dollars. We periodically enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges, and the change in the fair value is included in income currently within other income (expense). As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we had $2.4$30.0 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through December 2008.July 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2008, we had $2.8 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through September 2008. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of the Company, but are used in the calculation of cash settlements under the contracts. The fair value of these contracts at SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and June 30, 2008 was immaterial.  If foreign currency exchange rates (primarily the British pound and the Euro) change by 10% from the levels at SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, the effect on our comprehensive income would be approximately $20.7$20.5 million.

Inflation Risk.  Inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition during the preceding three years.

39

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements, transactions, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities that would be expected to have material current or future effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
 
Seasonality

Historically our net sales and earnings increase sequentially from quarter to quarter within a fiscal year, but the first quarter is typically less than the previous year’s fourth quarter.

Accounting Policies Involving Significant Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. We consolidate our subsidiaries, all of which, except for Test Evolution Corporation (see Note 4), are wholly owned. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements presented as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and for the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 represent the Company subsequent to its Acquisition (the “Successor” or “Successor Entity”), whereas the consolidated financial statements as of and for periods prior to August 15, 2007 represent the Company prior to the Acquisition (the “Predecessor” or “Predecessor Entity”). The purchase method of accounting was applied effective August 15, 2007 in connection with the Acquisition. Therefore, our consolidated financial statements for periods before August 15, 2007 are presented on a different basis than those for the periods after August 14, 2007 and, as such, are not comparable.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted inU.S. GAAP requires that management of the United StatesCompany make a number of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affectrelating to the reported amountsreporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period reported. The followingreporting period. Among the more significant estimates included in our consolidated financial statements are revenue and cost recognition under long-term contracts; the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories, investments and deferred tax assets; the depreciable lives of fixed assets and useful lives of amortizable intangible assets; the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations; the recoverability of long-lived amortizable intangible assets, tradenames and goodwill; share-based compensation; restructuring charges; asset retirement obligations; fair value measurement of financial assets and liabilities and certain accrued expenses and contingencies.

We are subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic, environmental and political factors and changes in the business climate; therefore, actual results may differ from those estimates. When no estimate in a given range is deemed to be better than any other when estimating contingent liabilities, the low end of the range is accrued. Accordingly, the accounting policies require usestimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made when circumstances warrant them. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to make estimatesthe consolidated financial statements.

Cash and assumptionsCash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments having maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition are considered to be cash equivalents.

Marketable Securities

Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholder’s equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in market value judged to be other than temporary, of which there were none, for the three years ended June 30, 2009, are included in other income (expense). Interest income and dividends are also included in other income.

40

At June 30, 2009, our marketable securities consisted of $17.7 million of auction rate securities, which is net of a $2.3 million valuation allowance. Auction rate securities represent long-term (generally maturities of ten years to thirty-five years from the date of issuance) variable rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates that are reset through an auction process, which occurs every seven to thirty-five days, and are classified as available for sale securities. All but one (with the one security having a carrying value of $1.7 million and an A rating) of our auction rate securities retain a triple-A rating by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. In addition, certain of our auction rate securities are backed by student loans whose principal and interest are federally guaranteed by the Family Federal Education Loan Program.  We have collected all interest payments on all of our auction rate securities when due and since early February 2008 (when auctions began to fail) have redeemed $27.5 million of auction rate securities at par, including $1.0 million redeemed at par in July 2009.

At June 30, 2009, the par value of our auction rate securities was $19.9 million; however we have estimated that the fair value of our auction rate securities as of that date was $17.7 million.  Since many auctions are failing and given that there is currently no active secondary market for our investment in auction rate securities, the determination of fair value was based on the circumstances, information availablefollowing factors:

·continuing illiquidity;
·lack of action by the issuers to establish different forms of financing to replace or redeem these securities; and
·the credit quality of the underlying securities.

As fair values have continued to be below cost, we have considered various factors in determining whether a credit loss exists and whether to recognize an other than temporary impairment charge, including the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below the cost basis, the timely receipt of all interest payments, the rating of the security, the relatively low volatility of the security’s fair value, the current financial condition of the issuer and our experienceintent and judgment. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically andability to hold the effectsinvestment for a period of revisions are reflectedtime sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the period that they are determined to be necessary. If actual results differ significantly from our estimates, our financial statements could be materially impacted.market value.

Auction rate securities are classified as non-current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Inventories

RevenuesInventories, including amounts related to long-term contracts accounted for under percentage-of-completion accounting, are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

Financial Instruments and Cost Recognition.  Derivatives

Foreign currency contracts are used in certain circumstances to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates. We enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges. Thus the change in fair value is included in income as it occurs, within other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations.

Our interest rate swap derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges. As such, they are recorded on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities at their fair value, with changes in the fair value of such derivatives, net of taxes, recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectibilitycollectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

For arrangements other than certain long-term contracts, revenue (including shipping and handling fees) is recognized when products are shipped and title has passed to the customer. If title does not pass until the product reaches the customer’s delivery site, recognition of the revenue is deferred until that time. Certain of our sales are to distributors which have a right to return some portion of product within up to eighteen months of sale. We recognize revenue on these sales at the time of shipment to the distributor, as the returns under these arrangements have been insignificant and can be reasonably estimated. A provision for such estimated returns is recorded at the time sales are recognized.

Long-term contracts are accounted for in accordance with SOP 81-1 “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.”  We determine estimated contract profit rates and use the percentage-of-completion method to recognize revenues and associated costs as work progresses on certain long-term contracts. We measure the extent of progress toward completion generally based upon one of the following methods (based upon an assessment of which method most closely aligns to the underlying earnings process),: (i) the units-of-delivery method, (ii) the cost-to-cost method, using the ratio of contract costs incurred as a percentage of total estimated costs at contract completion (based upon engineering and production estimates), or (iii) the achievement of contractual milestones. Provisions for anticipated losses or revisions in estimated profits on contracts-in-process are recorded in the period in which such anticipated losses or revisions become evident.

 
4841
 

Revenue from sales of products where software is other than incidental to their performance, including related software support and maintenance contracts is recognized in accordance with SOP-97-2,SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” Accordingly, revenue for software is recognized when the software is delivered, providedif all of the requisiteabove criteria for revenue recognition are met.

When a customer purchases software together with post contract support, we allocate a portion of the fee to the post contract support for its fair value based on the contractual renewal rate or the amount the support is sold for on a standalone basis. Post contract support fees are deferred in Advance Payments by Customers and Deferred Revenue in the consolidated balance sheets, and recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the related contract.

Inventories.  Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.  Inventory levels are maintained in relation to expected sales volumes. We periodically evaluate the net realizable value of our inventory. Numerous analyses are applied including lower of cost or market analysis, forecasted sales requirements and forecasted warranty requirements. After taking these and other factors into consideration, such as technological changes, age and physical condition, appropriate adjustments are recorded to the inventory balance. If actual conditions differ from our expectation, then inventory balances may be over or under valued, which could have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.Acquisition Accounting

Purchase Accounting and RecoverabilityWe use the purchase method to account for business combinations, whereby the total cost of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets.  Determiningan acquisition is allocated to the fair value of certain assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination is judgmental in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. There are various methods used to estimate the value of tangible and intangible assets acquired such as discounted cash flow and market multiple approaches. Someliabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The allocation of the more significantpurchase price is dependent upon certain valuations and other studies, which contain estimates and assumptions inherent in the two approaches include: projected future cash flows (including timing); discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in the future cash flows; perpetual growth rate; determination of appropriate market comparables; and the determination of whether a premium or a discount should be applied to comparables. There are also judgments made to determine the expected useful lives assigned to each class of assets and liabilities acquired. assumptions.

Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill is measuredcalculated as the excess of the cost of acquisitionpurchased businesses over the sumfair value of their underlying net assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of tradenames. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized. Definite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of customer related intangibles and developed technology, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging up to 11 years.  

We assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles at least annually for impairment as of June 30, or more frequently if certain events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred.  We test goodwill for impairment at the amounts assigned to identifiable assets acquired less liabilities assumed.reporting unit level, which is one level below our operating segments.  We perform an assessmentidentify our reporting units by assessing whether the components of whetherour operating segments constitute businesses for which discrete financial information is available and management of each reporting unit regularly reviews the operating results of those components.  Impairment testing is performed in two steps: (i) we determine if there is an indication thatimpairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, and (ii) if there is an impairment, we measure the amount of impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is impaired on an annual basis unless events or circumstances warrant a more frequent assessment. The impairment assessment involves, among other things, an estimation(the excess of the fair value of eachthe reporting unit over the fair value of ourits net identifiable assets) with the carrying amount of that goodwill.  The impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets encompasses calculating a fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and comparing the fair value to its carrying value.  If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, impairment is recorded.
Testing goodwill for impairment requires us to estimate fair values of reporting units. This estimate isunits using significant estimates and assumptions.  The assumptions made will impact the outcome and ultimate results of the testing.  We use industry accepted valuation models and set criteria that are reviewed and approved by various levels of management and, in certain instances, we engage third-party valuation specialists to assist us in estimating fair values.  To determine fair value of the reporting unit, we generally use an independent evaluation expert using bothincome approach.  We use a market approach to assess the reasonableness of the results of the income approach.
Under the income approach, we determine fair value approach and an income based approach. Such estimates are inherently subjective, and subject to change inusing a discounted cash flow method, estimating future periods.

In response to changes in industry and market conditions, we could be required to strategically realign our resources and consider restructuring, disposingcash flows of or otherwise exiting businesses, which could result in the impairment of goodwill and other long lived assets,each reporting unit, as well as terminal value, and discounting such cash flows at a reductionrate of return that reflects the relative risk of the cash flows.
The key estimates and factors used in the useful lives of such depreciable or amortizable long lived assets. Impairment chargesincome approach include, but are not limited to, revenue growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts, terminal value and the reductionweighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows. The fiscal 2009 compound annual growth rate of sales for the first 6 years of our projections ranged between 4% and 24%.  The fiscal 2008 compound annual growth rate of sales for the first 6 years of our projections ranged between 1% and 15%. The terminal growth rates were projected at 5% after between 7 to 10 years in useful livesfiscal 2009 as compared with 5% after between 9 to 11 years in fiscal 2008, which reflects our estimate of long term market and gross domestic product growth.  The weighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows ranged from 14% to 19% in fiscal 2009 as compared with 13% to 16% in fiscal 2008.  Future changes in these estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on ourmaterially affect the results of operationsour reviews for impairment of goodwill.  Changes in the valuation assumptions from those used in the prior year primarily reflect the impact of the current economic environment on the reporting units and financial condition.their projected future results of operations.

42

Property, plantTo determine fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, we use an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method.  This method assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to obtain the rights to use the comparable asset.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets’ fair values require significant judgments in determining both the assets’ estimated cash flows as well as the appropriate discount and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the leaseroyalty rates applied to those cash flows to determine fair value.  Changes in such estimates or the estimated lifeapplication of the asset, whichever is shorter. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances or changes to our business model can result in the actual useful lives differing from our estimates. To the extent the estimated useful lives are incorrect, the value of thesealternative assumptions could produce significantly different results.
We review other long-lived assets may be over or under stated, which in turn could have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Long-lived assets other than goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of anyamount may not be recoverable.  When such asset may be impaired. We evaluate theevents or changes in circumstances occur, a recoverability of such assets by estimating future cash flows. If the sum of thetest is performed comparing projected undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition isof an asset or asset group to its carrying value.  If the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the assets, we will recognizevalue, an impairment loss to the extent ofwould be recorded for the excess of the carrying amountvalue over the fair value, which is determined by discounting future cash flows.

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, principally on a straight-line basis. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the discounted cash flow.life of the lease, including anticipated renewals, or the estimated life of the asset, whichever is shorter.

Research and Development Costs

We charge all research and development costs to expense as incurred, except those of our software products for which costs incurred between the date of product technological feasibility and the date that the software is available for general release are capitalized. We use a working model of the software or a detailed program design to assess technological feasibility. We capitalized software development costs of $209,000, $1.2 million, $0 and $593,000, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively. Capitalized software development costs are amortized to cost of sales based on the higher of a) the percentage of revenue for units delivered to total anticipated revenue for the related product, or b) on a straight-line basis.  Capitalized software development costs of $328,000 and $1.2 million were included in other assets at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Income Taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Share Based Compensation

The fair value of share based payments is recognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the related vesting periods.  Share based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the portion of share based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest and has therefore been reduced for estimated forfeitures at the time of the grant, with subsequent revisions for the differences between actual and the estimated forfeiture rates.

Foreign Currency Translations

The financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are measured in their local currency and then translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method. Under the current rate method, assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates prevailing throughout the year.

If our actual resultsGains and losses resulting from the translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are notaccumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) and presented as favorable aspart of stockholder’s equity. Realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains (losses) from the forecasted results usedsettlement of foreign currency transactions are reflected in our impairment reviews of goodwillother income (expense) and other long-lived assets, impairment charges may be necessary which could have a material effect on our results of operationsamounted to $9.0 million, $2.3 million, $193,000 and financial condition.

Restructuring Charges.  When we incur a liability related$(1.3 million) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to a restructuring charge, we estimateJune 30, 2008 and record all appropriate expenses. These expenses include severance, retention bonuses, fringe benefits, asset impairment, buyout of leasesJuly 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and inventory write-downs. To the extent that our estimates differ from actual expenses, there could be significant additional expenses or reversals of previously recorded charges in the future.fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

 
4943
 

Income Taxes.  Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide income tax provision. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of revenue sharing and cost reimbursement arrangements among related entities, the process of identifying items of revenues and expense that qualify for preferential tax treatment and segregation of foreign and domestic income and expense to avoid double taxation. No assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material effect on our income tax provision and net earnings in the period in which such determination is made.

We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount of future tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, there is no assurance that sufficient taxable income will be generated in future years or that tax strategies will continue to be prudent. Accordingly, the valuation allowance might need to be increased to cover additional deferred tax assets that may not be realizable. Any increase in the valuation allowance could have a material adverse impact on our income tax provision and net earnings in the period in which such determination is made.

Share-Based Compensation.  With the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123(R) on July 1, 2005, we are required to record the fair value of share based compensation awards as an expense. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, the Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in this model are assumptions related to expected stock price volatility, option life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our shares using daily price observations over a period consistent with the expected life. We used the safe harbor guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 107 to estimate the expected life of options granted during fiscal 2007 and 2006. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods similar to the expected life. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock price volatility and option life assumptions require a greater level of judgment which makes them critical accounting estimates.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” to clarify the definition of fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value and expand the disclosures on fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price).  SFAS 157 also stipulates that, as a market-based measurement, fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (a) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independentSee Note 1 of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (b)Notes to the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13.”  This FSP amends SFAS 157 to exclude certain leasing transactions accounted for under previously existing accounting guidance.  However, this scope exception does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, regardless of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date for FASB Statement No. 157.”  This FSP permits the delayed application of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, as defined in this FSP, except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least annually, until the beginning of our fiscal 2010.  As of July 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157 (see Note 8), with the exception of its application to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which we will defer in accordance with FSP No. FAS 157-2.  We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS 157 at the beginning of fiscal 2010 for such nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.

50
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of aConsolidated Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active,” which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.  The FSP is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued.  Revisions resulting from a change in the valuation technique or its application should be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate following the guidance in SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.”  However, the disclosure provisions in SFAS 154 for a change in accounting estimate are not required for revisions resulting from a change in valuation technique or its application.  We adopted SFAS 157 beginning in our fiscal 2009 first quarter.  We used these key considerations in evaluating the fair value measurements of our financial assets and recorded a $1.2 million valuation allowance against  our auction rate securities. 
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” to permit all entities to choose to elect, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value.  An entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date, and recognize upfront costs and fees related to those items in earnings as incurred and not deferred.  SFAS 159 became effective for us as of July 1, 2008.  As we did not elect the fair value option for our financial instruments (other than those already measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157), the adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.Statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141(R) replaces SFAS 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effectsSee Note 1 of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for us for acquisitions consummated on or after July 1, 2009.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51.” SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the provisions of SFAS 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.”  SFAS 161 requires companies to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, quantitative disclosures of the fair values and gains and losses of these derivative instruments in a tabular format, as well as more information about liquidity by requiring disclosure of a derivative contract’s credit-risk-related contingent features.  SFAS 161 also requires cross-referencing within footnotes to enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. We are currently evaluating the disclosure requirements of SFAS 161. As this is a disclosure-only standard, there will be no impact on our consolidated financial statements as a result of its adoption. SFAS 161 becomes effective for our March 2009 interim consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.”  This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This FSP also adds certain disclosures to those already prescribed in SFAS 142.  FSP 142-3 becomes effective for the annual and interim periods within the year, beginning in our fiscal 2010. The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.”  This FSP provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years.  Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions in this FSP.  Early application of this FSP is prohibited.  We have not issued any share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents.

51

BUSINESS

Company Overview

We are a leading provider of highly specialized microelectronics and test and measurement equipment, primarily to the global aerospace and defense and broadband communications markets. We also design application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, for CT scan equipment for the medical industry. Founded in 1937, we have developed a substantial intellectual property portfolio that includes more than 150 patents, extensive know-how, years of collaborative research and development with our customers and a demonstrated history in space, validating the high quality performance of our products. We believe that the combination of our leading market positions, complementary portfolio of products, years of experience and engineering capabilities provides us with a competitive advantage and enables us to deliver high performance, high value products to our customers.
 
Our business is characterized the breadth and diversity of our product offerings, customer base, applications and end markets. We believe that we currently have significant market positions in the following product categories in which we compete: (i) RadHard “fabless” semiconductors, (ii) high performance mixed-signal ASICs, (iii) military radio test equipment and (iv) avionics test equipment. We offer a broad array of products, including custom and standard ICs such as databuses, transceivers, microcontrollers and microprocessors, globally to a diverse group of high quality customers. Our customers include the five prime defense contractors (Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon), as well as the U.S. Government, BAE, Cisco, Nokia, Motorola and Teradyne. In fiscal 2008,2009, our largest customer represented approximately 8% of our net sales and our largest product offering represented approximately 7%9% of our net sales.
 
We believe there are high barriers to entry to the markets in which we compete due to the need for specialized design and development expertise and patents and the significant costs for customers to switch vendors. We often design and develop applications through a collaborative process whereby we provide “spec’d” (customer specified) products to our customers.
 
As indicated in the tables below, our products are sold to customers who are located primarily in the United States, Europe, Middle East and Asia/Australia and who compete predominantly in the aerospace and defense and the broadband communications markets.
 
Net Sales by Customer Location Fiscal 2008  Fiscal 2007  Fiscal 2006  
Fiscal
2009
  
Fiscal
2008
  
Fiscal
2007
 
United States  54%  59%  58%  59%  54%  59%
Europe and the Middle East  24%  26%  27%  23%  24%  26%
Asia/Australia  20%  14%  13%  16%  20%  14%
Other Regions  2%  1%  2%  2%  2%  1%

Fiscal 2008 Net Sales by End Market
Aerospace & Defense59%
Broadband Communications30%
Other (Primarily CT Scan and Automotive)11%
Net Sales by End Market 
Fiscal
2009
  
Fiscal
2008
  
Fiscal
2007
 
Aerospace and Defense  65%  59%  60%
Broadband Communications  26%  30%  27%
Other (Primarily CT Scan and Automotive)  9%  11%  13%

We were organized in 1937 and in 1981 became a public company in 1981, becoming subject to the requirements to file periodic and other reports with the SEC.  On August 15, 2007, we were acquired by our parent company pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger, and, as a result, became a “private” company.  Commencing as of January 21, 2009, the date of effectiveness of our registration statement relating to our exchange offeringoffer of theOriginal Notes for Notes, we again became subject to SEC public reporting requirements.

 
44

Headquartered in Plainview, New York, we conduct our operations from 1618 facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and China and Sweden and employ more than 2,625approximately 2,700 employees as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008.

2009.
52

Our Segments

We combine our proprietary technologies with advanced fabrication and manufacturing processes to design, engineer, manufacture and market a diverse range of products through two primary business segments: Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, or AMS, and Aeroflex Test Solutions, or ATS. Our business benefits from the diversity provided by our two operating segments with respect to customers, geographies and industries, which limits our exposure to any specific end market, customer or technology.  The sales and operating profits of our two industry segments and the indentifiableidentifiable assets attributable to each segment for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended June 30, 20082009 are set forth in Note 1719 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
AMS
 
ATS
 Leading provider of RadHard and other ICs and modules for the aerospace and defense and the broadband communications markets Leading provider of next generation, specialty test and measurement systems for the wireless, military, aerospace, and avionics markets
    
    % of Net
Sales for
Fiscal
2008
47% 53%
    
    % of
Gross Profit
for Fiscal
2008
46% 54%
    
Products•  RF and microwave components •  Wireless test equipment
 •  High-reliability datacom/standard and application •  Avionics test equipment
         specific MCMs •  Third party testing services and other (including
 •  RadHard fabless semiconductors         automotive)
 •  Non-RadHard fabless semiconductors •  Military radio test equipment
 •  Integrated microwave assemblies •  Private mobile radio test equipment
 •  High-performance mixed signal ASICs •  General purpose test equipment
 •  Class K/power management •  Synthetic test equipment
 •  High-reliability aerospace motion control  
    
Competitive•  Leadership positions in specialty microelectronic •  Leadership positions in specialty
Advantages        niches within satellite, broadband         communications test niches, including military/
         communications and CT scan markets         private mobile radio, broadband/wireless and
 •  Focus on large and growing markets requiring         commercial and military avionics markets
         specialized, highly qualified solutions •  Focus on delivering advanced testing
 •  High-performance, high-reliability products         technologies to large and growing markets
 •  Pioneer in RF and microwave design and development •  Key patents in RF, wireless design and expertise in frequency
 •  Proprietary technologies         synthesis
 •  State-of-the-art fabless semiconductor •  Integrated hardware/software design focus
         production capability of scale •  State-of-the-art manufacturing processes
 •  Established long-term customer •  Pioneer in synthetic testing market
         relationships •  Established long-term customer
 •  High switching costs         relationships
We engineer, manufacture and market a diverse range of products through AMS and ATS.

 
5345
 
 
Product Portfolio (% of Fiscal 2008 Net Sales by Segment)
AMS
RF Components30%
RadHard Fabless Semiconductors14%
High-Reliability Datacom/Standard & Application Specific MCMs11%
Integrated Microwave Assemblies13%
High Performance Mixed Signal8%
Non-RadHard Fabless Semiconductors10%
Class K/Power Management8%
High Reliability/Aerospace Motion Control6%
ATS
Wireless20%
Avionics19%
Military Radio9%
Third Party Service and Other (1)14%
Private Mobile Radio13%
General Purpose Test17%
Synthetic Test8%
(1) Other includes Automotive.
 
AMS
ATS
 Leading provider of RadHard and other ICs and modules for the aerospace and defense and the broadband communications marketsLeading provider of next generation, specialty test and measurement systems for the wireless, military, aerospace, and avionics markets
   
% of Net
Sales for
Fiscal
2009
48%52%
   
% of
Gross Profit
for Fiscal
2009
47%53%
   
Products•  RF and microwave components•  Wireless test equipment
 •  High-reliability datacom/standard and application•  Avionics test equipment
         specific MCMs•  Third party testing services and other (including
 •  RadHard fabless semiconductors        automotive)
 •  Non-RadHard fabless semiconductors•  Military radio test equipment
 •  Integrated microwave assemblies•  Private mobile radio test equipment
 •  High-performance mixed signal ASICs•  General purpose test equipment
 •  Class K/power management•  Synthetic test equipment
 •  High-reliability aerospace motion control 
   
Competitive•  Leadership positions in specialty microelectronic•  Leadership positions in specialty
Advantages        niches within satellite, broadband        communications test niches, including military/
         communications and CT scan markets        private mobile radio, broadband/wireless and
 •  Focus on large and growing markets requiring        commercial and military avionics markets
         specialized, highly qualified solutions•  Focus on delivering advanced testing
 •  High-performance, high-reliability products        technologies to large and growing markets
 •  Pioneer in RF and microwave design and development•  Key patents in RF, wireless design and expertise in frequency
 •  Proprietary technologies        Synthesis
 •  State-of-the-art fabless semiconductor•  Integrated hardware/software design focus
         production capability of scale•  State-of-the-art manufacturing processes
 •  Established long-term customer•  Pioneer in synthetic testing market
         relationships•  Established long-term customer relationships
 •  High switching costs 
 
Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions
 
AMS is a leading designer and manufacturer of high-performance, high-reliability specialty microelectronics products for satellite, aerospace and defense applications. Satellite components are continually bombarded by energetic plasmas and other forms of radiation in space which can degrade the performance of these electronic components. Our RadHard products are of significant importance to our customers because they are specifically designed to tolerate high radiation-level environments and have proven high performance qualities and a demonstrated history in space. We believe our extensive knowledge of analog, mixed signal and digital semiconductor technology, from the device level to the design and assembly of complete subsystems, enables us to deliver high performance, high value products to our customers.
 
We operate under a “fabless” semiconductor manufacturing model, outsourcing substantially all semiconductor fabrication activities to commercial foundries, which we believe significantly reduces our capital expenditures and labor costs and enhances our ability to respond quickly with scalability to changes in technology and customer demands. We purchase our semiconductors from a variety of foundries, which utilize our proprietary design specifications and packaging techniques to manufacture our RadHard products. We test our RadHard products in our in-house radiation simulation testing chamber.
 
In order to help meet the requirements demanded by our customers, AMS’ Plainview, NY and Colorado Springs, CO facilities are space certified and qualified by the DSCC and have been manufacturing Class K products for defense and aerospace programs for over 15 years. Class K device manufacturing provides high quality and reliability for electronic parts through a number of specifications, standards and test methods. The additional requirements that define Class K address the specific needs of space users and are intended to provide more confidence to the customers that the device is of the highest initial quality and that any defective parts have been removed.

 
46

AMS offers a broad range of complementary products that provide connectivity among products, including custom and standardized ICs, programmable logic devices, sub-assemblies, multi-function modules, microcontrollers, microprocessors, databuses, transceivers and complex RF, and microwave microelectronics that are used in satellites, communications systems and avionics systems for aircraft and missiles. AMS also designs and manufactures application-specific, high performance analog and mixed signal semiconductors for use in medical, industrial, security and intelligent sensors. Our products are used in over 100 aerospace and defense platforms, including the WGS Satellites, NPOESS, ADHF Satellites, F-16’s modular mission computer, the 777 airliner’s databus, the B-1 flight controls upgrade and the THAAD program, and are widely used in the broadband communications industry and in the medical, industrial and security markets.
 
54
For fiscal 2008,2009, AMS generated $302.7$287.5 million of net sales and $122.8$134.2 million of gross profit.
 
Aeroflex Test Solutions
 
ATS is a leading designer, developer, manufacturer and service provider of a broad line of specialized test and measurement equipment. ATS has hardware and software expertise across the aerospace and defense and broadband communications markets and has garnered specific expertise in leading-edge communications standards. ATS products include avionics, communications and general purpose test equipment, instruments and systems which enable our customers to design, build, deploy and manage their products and technologies.
 
ATS believes that its key strengths include its strong reputation in RF synthesizers, its extensive offering of testing and measurement products and its early stage development in synthetic testing. ATS is a leader in RF and wireless test equipment, with particular capability in WiMax, LTE and EDGE protocols. Our position in RF technology is supported by key intellectual property in the area of high-speed RF synthesis. We believe ATS synthesizers cover all communication frequencies, and that ATS’ proprietary technology enables its products to generate the clean and fast RF signals. With the expected growth of RF testing, increasing numbers of wireless communications equipment will be procured and will require sophisticated testing beforehand. We are poised to take advantage of this growth, as we currently supply an extensive line of wireless test equipment to test RF components.
 
As technology continues to evolve and “next generation” broadband communications, military and commercial avionics and two-way communications protocols are introduced, equipment manufacturers and network providers require test and measurement products that are compatible with the new technologies as well as products that work with older generation equipment. In addition, wireless companies need test equipment for all stages of development: research and development and conformance testing; production testing; installation and commissioning; monitoring and optimization; and service and maintenance. We have garnered specific expertise in advanced RF and additional wireless technology and have geared our research and development and product development toward such next-generation technologies. Over the years, we have been developing advanced solutions for our customers and of providing a comprehensive collection of test and measurement equipment for all stages of the network life-cycle.
 
ATS is an early-stage entrant in the developing area of synthetic testing, which we believe has significant growth potential as a new market for test equipment in the commercial and military communications arenas. Synthetic test systems test several attributes through one “box” and can take multiple complex measurements simultaneously, producing the desired results several times faster than traditional “rack and stack” systems.
 
ATS’ specialty test product portfolio includes wireless test equipment, frequency synthesizers, military radio test equipment, synthetic test equipment, avionics test equipment and other general purpose test equipment. Our products are used by wireless service providers and equipment manufacturers to test wireless handsets and base stations; by radio manufacturers and military, police, fire and emergency response units to test handheld radio units; by satellite manufacturers to test satellite-based communications systems; by avionics manufacturers to design, manufacture, test and maintain both commercial and military avionics systems; and for spectrum analysis and production testing.
 
For fiscal 2008,2009, ATS generated $340.5$311.8 million of net sales and $144.6$150.9 million of gross profit.

 
47

Industry Overview

Our products predominantly serve the aerospace and defense market and the broadband communications market. In addition, our products serve two key growth markets: the CT scan market and the synthetic test market.
 
Aerospace and Defense
 
The aerospace and defense market has experienced significant growth in recent years.  Within the aerospace and defense market, our customers predominately fall into four end-markets: (i) defense electronics; (ii) satellite (primarily military); (iii) military communications market (military(for example, military radio SINCGARS); and (iv) military/civilian avionics (systems for military and commercial aircraft).
 
Defense Electronics Market
 
The current defense budget cycle trend began in the mid-1990s under the Clinton Administration and was driven by the need to modernize the military when faced with a significant block of obsolete equipment developed in the 1970s. In addition, after the first Gulf War, there was a desire to transform the military to the next generation of technology to our armed forces.technology.  Defense electronics spending has outperformed the broader defense investment budget throughout the current defense spending cycle. The primary driver has been the “digitization” of the U.S. military.
55
 
Macro trends that we believe continue to favor us include the “war on terror,” the long-term trend for increased use of electronics in existing platforms and the drive to create a global infrastructure network for the U.S. Department of Defense.
 
Satellite Market
 
The satellite community’s needs are diverse and consist of two primary segments: commercial (large fixed satellite service providers, such as INTELSAT) and government, which consists of civilian (national/international space agencies, such as NASA) and military (Department of Defense, intelligence agencies and foreign militaries). While our customers are predominately within the military government sub-segment, through our RadHard ICs and MCMs, we have significant access to both the commercial and civilian government satellite markets. Currently, we are benefiting from a trend toward increased spending on military satellite programs and expected growth in the overall satellite market over the next several years as defense spending remains strong and intelligence initiatives, including those related to homeland security and classified applications, continue to drive increased satellite technology development and production.
 
Government satellite demand originates from both countries that have an established domestic space industry and a record of using satellite technology (i.e.(e.g., the United States, Europe, China, Japan and India) and countries that have just recently entered the satellite industry by acquiring operations and scientific satellites and developing their own industrial capabilities to manufacture them (i.e.(e.g., Israel, Brazil and South Korea). Civilian government satellite demand is fueled by increased research funding on global climate changes, Mars explorations and “Return to the Moon” initiatives. Military satellite growth is being driven primarily by the United States through a focus on maintaining U.S. space superiority, recapitalization of Cold War space assets, military demand for more bandwidth, the need for next-generation technology requiring higher power and more processing needs.
 
Many of the military and aerospace programs run by incumbent prime contractors, such as Hughes, Loral and Raytheon, continue to outsource their high-reliability micro-components to more specialized companies such as us. In an effort to reduce their own production costs and ensure state-of-the-art performance capabilities, satellite manufacturers are outsourcing an increasing amount of their component and subsystems production to global suppliers of high-reliability, RadHard semiconductors and devices. We expect to continue to benefit from this trend toward outsourcing and the movement from component-level outsourcing towards production of MCMs and board and system-level products, which represent a significantly larger proportion of satellite component costs. As a result, our strategy is to continue to increase our revenue share at the customer level and move up the “value chain”.
 
As a result of the growing satellite market, we believe that the demand for RadHard chips will increase. Satellite components are continually bombarded by energetic plasmas and other forms of radiation which can degrade the performance of these electronic components. Military space and avionics are expected to be the key net sales growth drivers as a result of:
 
increased outsourcing by the defense prime contractors and system houses driven by cost-cutting initiatives;
 
48

performance and need to assure supplier viability;
 
growth in high-end military satellites with increasing RadHard requirements; and
 
strong “aftermarket”/electronic upgrade sales in the near term due to program delays resulting in the resulting need to upgrade or enhance existing platforms and systems.
 
Military Communications Market
 
One key area of the military communications market is military radio. Demand is currently being driven by U.S. operations abroad, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan. Presently, the predominant form of military radio is the SINCGARS system. SINCGARS provides U.S. military personnel with a reliable, secure, easily maintained Combat Net Radio that handles voice and data. Active military operations continue to generate a large requirement for deployable radios. The demand for more capable and effective communication systems has fueled the development of the U.S. military’s next generation multi-service tactical radio for Army FCS, the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS). JTRS is a software-defined radio that is expected to be adopted for field use by 2010.
56
 
Replacements and upgrades to the current, aging SINCGARS radio system and the eventual roll-out of the JTRS platform are expected to drive demand in the military radio test market. Additional delays in the transition to the JTRS platform are expected to result in even more SINCGARS spending, which demands one test set for approximately every 300 SINCGARS units. In addition, there is a trend for consolidating military testing, requiring the development of a new technology allowing a single testing platform to test multiple types of radios. These drivers are expected to continue to create growth opportunities for the military radio test market.
 
Military and Commercial Avionics Market
 
Demand for avionics test systems is driven by upgrades in military and commercial avionics technologies, such as electronics warfare, control and display systems and emerging homeland defense. The military avionics market is currently experiencing budget pressure on new programs due to escalating unit costs, despite strong overall demand driven by continued military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Due to the strain on defense spending, older legacy programs are being kept alive instead of deploying replacements. As a result, the average aircraft age is expected to increase, creating the need for more upgrades. New fighter programs and maintenance and upgrades on older platforms are expected to continue to drive the military avionics market.
 
The commercial avionics market continues to experience the effects of the post-9/11 impact on the consumer airline industry, poor economic conditions, as well as potentially high fuel prices. Due to the prevalence of bankruptcy, efficiency and cost reductions have become top priorities for both low-cost and legacy carriers. Older passenger aircraft are being retired in deference to more efficient aircraft such as the Boeing 787. As the carriers return to profitability, they are expected to increase upgrades and replacements, driving demand for commercial avionics.
 
Broadband Communications
 
The broadband communications market is expected to continue to grow, as demand for high-speed access to the internet increases. Growth in the volume of communications traffic and increasing demand for services such as multimedia that require higher data rates and consequently consume greater bandwidth have resulted in more extensive use of the frequency spectrum and are driving the electronics industry to develop more creative and efficient uses of available frequency spectrum. With the continued deployment of next generation wireless infrastructure, we anticipate that equipment spending in the broadband communications market will remain strong. In the coming years, we also expect significant broadband growth in emerging markets. Growth in the broadband communications market is expected to drive increased expenditures on infrastructure. Within the broadband communications market, our customers predominately fall into the wireless communications end-market.
 
Wireless Communications
 
The desire for more sophisticated, high speed wireless services, satellite radio and television communications and greater bandwidth is helping to fuel the demand for high-speed wireless data services and newer technologies are enabling wireless exchange of data at broadband speeds. Fast growing international wireless markets, particularly in Asia, are also driving next generation infrastructure and equipment spending. ATS maintains strong relationships with leading global wireless equipment vendors and we believe that we are well-positioned to benefit from growing spending levels in these markets. Wireless communications test equipment is produced for base stations and air interfaces, mobile stations, electronic meters and other wireless communications equipment.

 
49

RF communications is a sub-segment of wireless communications and a significant area in which we compete. In addition to being a leader in RF test equipment, we also offer a range of RF products. The total available market for RF products is anticipated to expand as developing markets continue to emerge and as data-intensive networks enable new applications, such as music players, gaming and video services. Higher data rate handsets that offer higher functionality often contain multiple radios, thereby increasing the market for RF products. Multiple-input, multiple-output technology, which is used in several future standards to increase data rates, is also expected to increase the RF content of the phone. At the same time, lower-tier handsets that are optimized for emerging markets are driving new subscriber growth, which is also increasing the market for RF products. We believe that we are well-positioned to take advantage of this growth as we currently supply an extensive line of wireless test equipment to test RF components and we have garnered specific expertise in advanced RF and additional wireless technology and have focused our research and development and product development toward such next-generation technologies.
 
57
Growth Markets
 
CT Scan Market
 
We are also utilizing our expertise in mixed-signal ASICs in CT scan equipment for the medical industry into new markets and new applications. CT scanning equipment is heavily reliant on high-performance semiconductors and other electronic components. Mixed-signal ASICs are high-quality, high performance products that extract low-level signals in high noise environments. When embedded into CT medical imaging machines, this translates to better image quality and lower doses of radiation per scan. We believe these benefits coupled with the decreasing costs per channel, will help drive growth for the overall CT scan market. The trend toward decreasing costs per channel has translatedwill translate into strong growth in the number of potential uses of CT technology outside of medical environments, including security screening and non-destructive test equipment. Suppliers of ASICs into CT scan machines are expected to directly benefit from the market expansion of such technology. In addition, advances in CT scan technology, growth in procedure volume and demand for CT imaging equipment from more diverse markets like clinical trials, a growing outpatient market, and increased government healthcare expenditures are expected to result in an expansion of the CT scan.
 
Synthetic Test Market
 
We are an early entrant in the area of synthetic testing, which we believe has significant growth potential as a relatively new market for test equipment. The synthetic testing market can be categorized into three areas: (i) satellite test-market representing,test, (ii) Transmit/Receive module markettest and (iii) military test, market, which is the largest. A synthetic test system replaces the traditional “rack and stack” system that requires a separate testing device for each attribute, with a single device that can take multiple complex measurements simultaneously and can complete a series of tests several times faster than a traditional system. The synthetic test standard has been adopted by many other leading commercial market vendors.
 
The U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Navy, which instituted NxTest, are responsible for the emergence and growth of synthetic testing. The NxTest initiative is to minimize the size of the test system, thereby reducing hardware and consequently the cost of the system. Synthetic testing also addresses obsolescence issues and provides additional flexibility for easy upgrades.
 
Our Competitive Strengths

Leading Proprietary Technology Platforms
 
Our history of technological innovation and product performance has made us a leading supplier to our customers. Our team of 565800 engineers workswork with customers to develop customized solutions and we currently possess a portfolio of more than 150 patents. We pioneered the development of fabless high reliability RadHard technology and have a history of designing and manufacturing field-tested solutions that meet our military and commercial customers’ stringent performance requirements. Our design and production platform combines design expertise, proprietary intellectual property and a reliable, efficient fabrication/manufacturing processes, includingprocess that includes our “fabless” semiconductor manufacturing model. In addition, AMS is taking a leading role in expanding the market for CT scan applications through our ASIC product offerings. ATS holds key intellectual property and specialized knowledge in RF and wireless technology with a focus on leading edge communication protocols. ATS is also a leader in developing synthetic test equipment and has proven expertise in avionics and private mobile radio test equipment.

 
50

Strong, Defensible Market Positions
 
Our proven product performance and long-standing customer relationships have established us as one of the leading suppliers in the majority of the markets in which we compete. Our microelectronics products are key components in over 100 aerospace and defense platforms, and we believe we were the sole source or primary supplier for many of the products that we supply.
 
High Barriers to Entry and Customer Switching Costs
 
We are an experienced and well-respected supplier to the aerospace and defense and broadband communications industries.  Additionally, we possess a portfolio of over 150 highly specialized patents and our products are often designed into, or “spec’d”, into a customer’s production design, which creates significant switching costs for our customers. Furthermore, strict product performance requirements, Department of Defense certification and proven experience in the harsh operating environment of space create high barriers to entry tofor new market entrants. The malfunction of a component can lead to the loss of a valuable satellite or missile, causing the industry’s customers to require proven product performance and reliability before specifying inclusion of a vendor’s components into a satellite or missile program’s design. Our expertise and product performance are demonstrated by our receipt of Class K certification from the DSCC (Defense Supply Center Columbus), a distinction we have held for over 15 years.
 
58
Growing and Diverse End Markets
 
We serve a diverse group of customers who compete in several end markets. Each of our broad end markets contains several specialized niche markets, each possessing attractive growth dynamics.
 
Aerospace and Defense.  We are well positioned to gain from increased defense electronics spending and believe that our product niche helps to insulate us from defense budget cuts. Most of AMS’ sales to the U.S. government are for its RadHard high reliability components that are used in a multitude of devices including satellites, missiles and airplanes. There is a strong pipeline of business for both military avionics and classified satellite programs that we believe will help our business to remain stable and profitable even through a challenging federal budget cycle. Spending on defense electronics is the primary driver of our net sales and has historically been stable and growing irrespective of movements in the defense budget. In addition to positive growth trends in defense electronics, we also benefit from strong growth trends in the satellite industry.
 
Broadband Communications.  Global demand for mobile communication services and for real-time access to diverse types of data continues to increase, which has led to rapid adoption of a wide variety of advanced wireless and wired electronic systems to which our products are critical (e.g., cellular telephones and broadband access). Next-generation technologies are expected to enable new applications, increase RF complexity and require greater RF semiconductor content. In addition, an increasing number of automotive, industrial, military, homeland security, scientific and medical applications use RF, microwave and millimeterwave technology to perform detection, measurement and imaging functions. The wireless communications industry has grown rapidly as a result of the worldwide adoption of mobile phones. SubscribersIn addition, subscribers typically upgrade when replacing phones, asphones. As a result of which we believe the complexity of phones will likely continue to increase, requiring even more semiconductor content and testing.
 
CT Scan.  We are a leader in the production of mixed-signal ASICs for the medical CT scan market. We believe that the current high level of performance (i.e., superior image quality with low doses of radiation) and decreasing cost per channel will eventually help drive new applications for ASICs outside traditional medical imaging applications and into areas such as security screening and non-destructive testing equipment. We expect to benefit directly from the future expansion of the overall CT scan market due to our leading market share for mixed-signal ASICs in the medical CT scan market.
 
Increasing Electronic Content per Satellite and Trend Towards Outsourcing
 
We benefit directly from the increasing electronic and systems-level content of military systems, particularly within the satellite end market. As we have utilized our intellectual property to move up the “value chain” from producing semiconductors and components to system-levelboard-level and board-levelsystem-level products, the content we provide on each satellite has increased. From fiscal 2001 to 2003, our average dollar content per satellite was $1.5 million while from fiscal 2004 to 2006, our average dollar content per satellite was approximately $2.5 million and forwhile from fiscal 2007 to 2008,2009, our average dollar content per satellite was approximately $4.2$4.7 million.

 
51

In addition, in an effort to reduce their own production costs and ensure state-of-the-art performance capabilities, satellite manufacturers are outsourcing an increasing amount of their component and subsystems production to global suppliers of high-reliability RadHard semiconductors and devices. Previously, satellite manufacturers primarily outsourced lower cost semiconductor components, but they are now moving towards outsourcing a broader range of component production, including board-board-level and system-level products that contain significantly more silicon content and represent a larger percentage of component cost. We expect to continue to benefit from this trend towards outsourcing in the future and will seek to increase our content per satellite.
 
Strong Historical Financial Performance and Free Cash Flow Generation
 
From fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2008,2009, we increased net sales by a compounded annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 20%15%.  Our “fabless” semiconductor manufacturing process and assembly operations allow us to maintain low capital expenditures (2%(i.e., 3.1%, 2.2% and 3.1% as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2008)2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively) and lower labor costs. Historically, our capital expenditure needs have increased due to our growth via acquisitions and not as a result of maintenance and replacement requirements. Our low capital expenditures have resulted in significant operating cash flow.
59
 
Diverse, High Quality Customer Base
 
We have strong and long-standing relationships with top-tier defense, aerospace and broadband customers, including a significant number of defense-related technology companies. Our close customer relationships have enabled us to engage in collaborative product development over multi-year product life-cycles, build our intellectual property portfolio and develop critical product and end-market expertise, resulting in higher switching costs for our customers. We believe our long track record of design successes with our customers further benefits our ability to: (i) solidify our position as a sole source or primary supplier of products to customers across a wide array of programs; (ii) enjoy long multi-year platform relationships; (iii) maximize the effectiveness of our research and development spending; and (iv) minimize our customers’ product development time. Our customers include the five prime defense contractors (Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon), as well as BAE, Cisco, Nokia, Motorola and Teradyne. Our products are used by customers in various aerospace and defense and broadband communications programs, providing us with increased revenue diversification and stability. In fiscal 2008,2009, our largest customer represented approximately 8% of our net sales and our largest product offering represented approximately 7%9% of our net sales, demonstrating the diversity of our customer base and product offerings.base.  In addition to our diverse product base, we believe that we are well-positioned in domestic and international growth markets and believe that our geographic and product diversification helps to reduce the risk associated with the volatility of one particular region or market segment.
 
Strong and Experienced Management Team
 
We are led by an experienced, stable and well-respected management team. Since 1991, we have integrated 2326 acquisitions. We have increased net sales from $62.7 million in fiscal 1991 to $643.2$599.3 million in fiscal 2008,2009, a CAGR of 15%13.4%. Our management team has an average of 27nearly 30 years in the industry and 13nearly 15 years with us.
 
Our Business Strategy

We generate sales and cash flow from the sale of microelectronic and test solution products into the aerospace and defense and broadband communications markets. We believe that the key to our future success is a focus on performance, design and manufacturing innovation and continuing to strengthen our long-term customer relationships. To implement our strategy, we intend to do the following:
 
·
Leverage technology and sole source or primary supplier status with customers.  Our proprietary technology and strong relationships with our diverse customer base are key drivers of our continued growth. We have a history of providing value to our customers through differentiated products, which are often critical to their end products, and we possess over 150 patents. We have leveraged our proprietary technology and experience to become, in our belief, the sole source or primary supplier on many of the products that we supply.   Further, our products are often “spec’d” into our customers’ product designs. We seek to work with our customers through every aspect of their design processes as they develop new technology platforms, delivering precisely engineered products to our customers’ specifications.

Continue to focus on our “fabless” semiconductor manufacturing operations.  Our expertise is in the state-of-the-art design and engineering of highly specialized microelectronics. Unlike certain of our competitors who have invested in captive semiconductor fabrication facilities, AMS pioneered the use of third-party foundries to produce space qualified, high reliability RadHard ICs. This “fabless” operating model significantly reduces our required capital investment and labor costs and is a key component of our industry-leading capital efficiency. In addition, it allows us to quickly respond to changes in technology and customer product requirements. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, capital expenditures were only 2%
·
Continue to focus on our “fabless” semiconductor manufacturing operations.  Our expertise is in the state-of-the-art design and engineering of highly specialized microelectronics. Unlike certain of our competitors who have invested in captive semiconductor fabrication facilities, AMS pioneered the use of third-party foundries to produce space qualified, high reliability RadHard ICs. This “fabless” operating model significantly reduces our required capital investment and labor costs and is a key component of our industry-leading capital efficiency. In addition, it allows us to quickly respond to changes in technology and customer product requirements. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, capital expenditures were only 3.1% of our net sales.
Increased focus on new product development.  We continue to allocate research and development spending toward new products serving large and/or growing markets. We endeavor to introduce new products to the market that allow us to move up to more profitable systems and products. We have transitioned from providing simple components, such as semiconductors, to more integrated products, including board-level and system-level products. Examples of recent new products include ASICs, satellite power subsystems and microwave/RF modules and receivers. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, we invested 13% of our net sales into self-funded research and development efforts. Examples of new product opportunities that we are pursuing are the CT scanning market and the synthetic testing market.

 
6052
 

·
Increased focus on new product development.  We continue to allocate research and development spending toward new products serving large and/or growing markets. We endeavor to introduce new products to the market that allow us to move up to more profitable systems and products. We have transitioned from providing simple components, such as semiconductors, to more integrated products, including board-level and system-level products. Examples of recent new products include ASICs, satellite power subsystems and microwave/RF modules and receivers. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, we invested 11.7% of our net sales into self-funded research and development efforts. Examples of new product opportunities that we are pursuing are the CT scan market and the synthetic test market.

CT scanning equipment is heavily reliant on high performance semiconductors and other electronic components, including mixed-signal ASICs, to produce high quality imaging with low doses of radiation per scan.  We believe that these benefits, coupled with decreasing production costs, will help drive growth of the overall CT scan market outside of the traditional medical environments and into markets such as security screening and non-destructive test equipment.

We are also an early entrant in the area of synthetic testing, which has significant growth potential as a relatively new market for test equipment. The U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Navy, which instituted the next-generation automatic test system program “NxTest,” are responsible for the emergence and growth of synthetic testing. The NxTest initiative isaims to minimize the size of the test system, thereby reducing hardware and consequently the cost of the system. Synthetic testing also addresses obsolescence issues and provides additional flexibility for easy upgrades.

Focus on cost management.  We plan to continue to improve our fixed cost position by critically examining the profitability of our operations and consolidating operations across facilities where operational synergies exist. In fiscal 2006, we implemented a plan to restructure our European businesses by consolidating a majority of our European manufacturing operations into our Stevenage, England facility. In fiscal 2008, we continued to restructure our European operations by further rationalizing duplicative research and development and selling, general and administrative activities, which recently resulted in the closure of our Burnham, England facility and relocation of its operations to Stevenage, England. In May 2008, we sold our radar system development and manufacturing business, or the Radar Division, which had been operating at a significant loss in each of the last two fiscal years.
·
Focus on cost management.  We plan to continue to improve our fixed cost position by critically examining the profitability of our operations and consolidating operations across facilities where operational synergies exist. In fiscal 2006, we implemented a plan to restructure our European businesses by consolidating a majority of our U.K. manufacturing operations into our Stevenage, England facility. In fiscal 2008, we continued to restructure our U.K. operations by further rationalizing duplicative research and development and selling, general and administrative activities, which resulted in the closure of our Burnham, England facility and relocation of its operations to Stevenage, England. In May 2008, we sold our radar system development and manufacturing business, or the Radar Division, which had been operating at a significant loss.  We will continue to examine our operations for opportunities to further reduce costs, divest non-strategic businesses, increase cash flow and improve our margins.
 
·
Capitalize on shifting defense budget allocations.  We are well-positioned to gain from increases in defense electronic spending. Since the beginning of the Iraq war, the defense industry has increased spending on electronics, intelligence gathering operations, satellites and homeland security. If current defense spending on training and procurement were to be reduced, we believe we would continue to benefit from a significant pipeline of business and re-allocation of spending to defense electronics for both military avionics and classified satellite programs that produce stable sales and cash flow. Furthermore, we believe the digitization and networking of the U.S. military and the upgrading of old platforms will continue to drive defense electronics spending growth, even in the face of declining overall defense industry spending.

Capitalize on shifting defense budget allocations.
·
Strategic acquisitions.  We will continue to seek accretive acquisitions that provide complementary products and services, enhance our intellectual property and customer base, and provide entry into high-growth adjacent markets. We view our acquisition strategy as an extension of our research and development and marketing efforts. Recent strategic acquisitions in both the AMS and ATS segments have broadened and strengthened our product offering and technology portfolio. Since 2002, we have acquired 12 businesses and plan to opportunistically continue our disciplined approach to seeking accretive acquisitions.  For instance:  We are well-positioned to gain from increases in defense electronic spending. Since the beginning of the Iraq war, the defense industry has increased spending on electronics, intelligence gathering operations, satellites and homeland security. If current defense spending on training and procurement were to be reduced, we believe we would continue to benefit from a significant pipeline of business and re-allocation of spending to defense electronics for both military avionics and classified satellite programs that produce stable sales and cash flow. Furthermore, we believe the digitization and networking of the U.S. military and the upgrading of old platforms will continue to drive defense electronics spending growth, even in the face of declining overall defense industry spending.
 
·In April 2007, we acquired MicroMetrics, Inc., which is a design and full service manufacturer of both standard and application specific RF/Microwave diodes and semiconductor devices.

·In October 2007, we purchased 40% of the outstanding stock of Test Evolution Corporation, which develops and manufactures digital, analog and RF semiconductor automated test equipment.

Strategic acquisitions.  We will continue to seek accretive acquisitions that provide complementary products and services, enhance our intellectual property and customer base, and provide entry into high-growth adjacent markets. We view our acquisition strategy as an extension of our research and development and marketing efforts. Recent strategic acquisitions in both the AMS and ATS segments have broadened and strengthened our product offering and technology portfolio. Since 2002, we have acquired nine businesses and plan to opportunistically continue our disciplined approach to seeking accretive acquisitions.
53

·In June 2008, we acquired Gaisler Research AB, which is a provider of integrated circuit software products and services to European space system suppliers, plus other U.S., Japanese and Russian space system agencies.

·In March 2009, we acquired VI Technology, Inc., which designs and manufactures independent automated test systems.

·In June 2009, we acquired the assets of Airflyte Electronics, which designs and manufactures custom-engineered slip rings for high-performance applications.

Products Offered
 
Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions
 
AMS products provide end users in the aerospace and defense, broadband communications and medical equipment markets with high-precision, high-reliability semiconductors for mission-critical applications. AMS’ broad product portfolio has a longstanding, field-tested history of reliable performance, and is often designed into customers’ product designs.
 
AMS products, especially RadHard semiconductors, are essential components in government and commercial satellites. These satellites require high-performance and high-reliability components to function properly while simultaneously enduring harsh conditions. In order to meet the requirements demanded by our customers, AMS’ Plainview, NY and Colorado Springs, CO facilities are space certified, and they have been manufacturing Class K products for defense and aerospace programs for over 15 years. AMS products include RF components, high-reliability datacom, (standardstandard and application),application specific MCMs, RadHard fabless semiconductors, automotive, non-RadHard fabless semiconductors, integrated microwave assemblies, high-performance mixed signal ASICs, Class K/power management and high-reliability aerospace motion control.
61
 
Satellite manufacturing companies are increasingly outsourcing their component and subsystems production to global suppliers of high-reliability RadHard semiconductors and devices, such as us. Previously, these satellite companies primarily outsourced lower cost semiconductor components and MCMs, but have begun to outsource a broader range of component production, including boardboard-level and system levelsystem-level products which contain significantly more silicon content and represent a larger percentage of overall system cost. As we have utilized our intellectual property to move up from producing semiconductors and components to higher-value system-levelboard-level and board-levelsystem-level products, the content we provide on each satellite has increased. From fiscal 2001 to 2003, our average dollar content per satellite was $1.5 million while from fiscal 2004 to 2006, our average dollar content per satellite was approximately $2.5 million and forwhile from fiscal 2007 to 2008,2009, our average dollar content per satellite was approximately $4.2 million$4.7 million. We believe that we will continue to benefit from the trend toward outsourcing and the movement from component-level outsourcing toward production of MCMs and boardboard-level and system levelsystem-level products, which represent a significantly larger proportion of satellite component bill of materials.
 
AMS products are sold into the aerospace, defense and satellite markets to top-tier industry original equipment manufacturers or OEMs,(“OEMs”), and their sub-tier suppliers. AMS products are used in remote sensing, communications and motion control for GEO, Medium Earth Orbiting and Low Earth Orbiting satellites. Radio Frequency Microwave (RFMW) products are also used in military radar, airborne and ground based communication systems, Electronic Warfare programs, Identification Friend or Foe programs and Guidance/Command/Control/Communications programs across multiple platforms.
 
AMS products also serve two of the three major global providers of CT scanning equipment. AMS’ mixed-signal ASICs are high-quality, high-performance products that extract low-level signals in high-noise environments. When embedded into CT medical imaging machines, this translates to better image quality and lower doses of radiation per scan. We believe these benefits, coupled with the decreasing costs per channel, will help drive growth for the overall CT scan market. The trend toward decreasing costs per channel has translated into strong growth in the number of potential uses of CT technology outside of medical environments, including security screening and non-destructive test equipment. As a key supplier of mixed signal ASICs into CT medical machines, we believe that we are well-positioned to benefit from an increase in the market for this technology.
 
Aeroflex Test Solutions
 
ATS’ products include avionics, communications and general purpose test equipment, instruments and systems which enable our customers to design, build, deploy and manage their products and technologies.

54

ATS’ avionic test solutions are used in the design, manufacture, test and maintenance of commercial, civil and military avionics systems. As a leader in avionic testing solutions, ATS equipment provides the stimulus and signals necessary for certification, verification, fault finding and diagnostics of avionics systems on the ground. We also provide customized avionics test solutions to support manual and automatic test equipment for manufacturing, repair and ground support operations.
 
Our military communications testing systems are primarily used by the U.S. military to test complex voice and data frequency hopping radios and accessories. Our ruggedized packaging makes the system suitable for depot and field maintenance shops.
 
ATS has over 50 years of experience in providing radio test set solutions. We are the leading provider of Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) and Project 25 (P25) radio test equipment used by major manufacturers, installers, operators and repairers worldwide.  TETRA is the global standard for Private Mobile Radio (PMR), used particularly by emergency services, public transport and utilities. P25 is a standard for digital radio communications for use by federal, state/province and local public safety agencies in North America to enable them to communicate with other agencies and mutual aid response teams in emergencies.
 
We also offer a wide selection of cellular test sets addressing both mobile and base station test applications across an array of wireless standards. Research and development applications include protocol stack development, system integration and interoperability testing.
 
We also create testing solutions for 3G infrastructure developers and 3G network operators to assist them in debugging new network features, interoperability analysis, regression testing, network stress testing, acceptance testing, quality of service analysis and network performance optimization.
 
Research and Development
 
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we had 565approximately 800 engineers conducting research and development activities at 1617 of our facilities.
62
 
Our research and development efforts primarily involve engineering and design relating to:
 
developing new products;
 
improving existing products;
 
adapting existing products to new applications; and
 
developing prototype components to bid on specific programs.
 
We emphasize research and development efforts for products in both the AMS and ATS divisions. In AMS, we have geared our research and development capabilities toward continually introducing new, high value products, including the planned introduction of power subsystems and microwave/RF Modules and microreceivers between 2007 and 2009, enabling us to increase the number of our products embedded into modern satellites. In ATS, we are developing technologies that are used in the next generation of wireless infrastructure. Our research and development consists of self-funded research and development as well as research and development we conduct in collaboration with or on behalf of our customers.
 
Certain product development and similar costs are recoverable under contractual arrangements and those that are not recoverable are expensed in the year incurred. We invested $82.1$70.1 million in self-funded research and development for fiscal 2009, $82.1 million for fiscal 2008 and $76.7 million for fiscal 2007 and $72.1 million for fiscal 2006.2007.
 
Our Customers
 
AMS addresses value-added specialty markets requiring application-specific, custom engineered, high-performance microelectronic solutions. The division has strong relationships with the five prime defense contractors (Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon) as well as with several major defense-related technology companies, including Honeywell. AMS customers also include OEMs such as BAE, Cisco and Phillips. The 10 largest AMS customers represented approximately 45% of total AMS fiscal 2008 sales, with no single customer representing more than 8% of total AMS fiscal 2008 sales.

 
55

ATS addresses value-added specialty markets requiring application specific, custom engineered, high-performance testing solutions. The division has strong relationships with several major defense-related technology companies, including Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Teradyne. ATS customers also include OEMs such as AT&T, Nokia, Motorola and Sprint. The top 10 ATS customers represent approximately 41% of total ATS fiscal 2008 sales with no single customer representing more than 11% of total ATS fiscal 2008 sales.
 
Certain of our customers, such as BAE and Honeywell, are also our competitors due to their in-house capabilities. On a consolidated basis, our largest customer represented approximately 8%9% of our fiscal 20082009 net sales.
 
Government Sales
 
Approximately 28%37% of sales for fiscal 20082009 were to agencies of the U.S. government or to prime defense contractors or subcontractors of the U.S. government. These government contracts have been awarded either on a bid basis or after negotiation. These contracts generally provide for fixed prices and have customary provisions for termination at the convenience of the government without cause.
 
Marketing
 
We employ a team-based sales approach to assist our personnel to closely manage relationships at multiple levels of the customer’s organization, including management, engineering and purchasing personnel. This integrated sales approach involves a team consisting of a senior executive, a business development specialist and members of our engineering department. Our use of experienced engineering personnel as part of the sales effort enables close technical collaboration with our customers during the design and qualification phase of new technologies and equipment. We believe that this is critical to the integration of the product into the customer’s equipment. Manufacturers’ representatives and independent sales representatives are also used as needed. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we had 210approximately 200 sales people employed domestically and internationally.
63
 
Backlog
 
We include in backlog firm purchase orders or contracts providing for the delivery of products and services. Our business has experienced strong growth in our backlog. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, our order backlog was approximately $271$271.9 million, of which approximately 78%80% was scheduled to be delivered on or before June 30, 2009.2010. Approximately 57%51% of our backlog as of SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 represented commercial contracts and approximately 43%49% of this backlog represented firm contracts with agencies of the U.S. government or prime defense contractors or subcontractors of the U.S. government. Generally, government contracts are cancelable with payment to us of amounts which we have spent under the contract together with a reasonable profit, if any, while commercial contracts are not cancelable.
 
As of June 30, 2008, our order backlog was approximately $251$251.0 million.  Approximately 59% of this backlog represented commercial contracts and approximately 41% of this backlog represented firm contracts with agencies of the U.S. government or prime defense contractor or subcontractors of the U.S. government.
 
Competition
 
For all of our products, we compete primarily on the basis of both performance and price.
 
AMS primarily competes with large defense-related technology providers, including BAE and Honeywell. In addition, AMS competes with a small number of specialty semiconductor providers, including Actel, Hittite Microwave Corporation and ILC/Data Devices Corporation. We believe we are one of the largest focused providers of specialty microelectronics to our targeted markets and that we are the leading global fabless platform of scale in RadHard semiconductors.  In addition, we believe our specialized expertise in RadHard technology, RF and microwave design and development and fabrication expertise provides us with a differentiated technology and pricing position versus our most direct competitors. We characteristically maintain close and longstanding relationships with our customers and maintain sole-source/primary supplier positions with many of our customers. We believe there are high barriers to entry tointo the markets in which we compete due to the need for specialized design and development expertise and patents and the significant costs for customers to switch vendors. We design and develop applications often through a collaborative process whereby we provide “spec’d” products to our customers.
 

56

ATS primarily competes with Agilent and a small number of specialty test and measurement providers, including Anite, Anritsu, Rohde & Schwarz and Spirent. We believe our specialized expertise in high performance RF and wireless testing equipment and our focus on delivery of advanced testing platforms and optimized manufacturing capability provide us with a differentiated position versus our most direct competitors.  We believe we continue to maintain the largest installed base of any of our competitors maintainin the specialized test categories in which we compete, including many sole source/primary supplier positions with customers such as Teradyne, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon.
 
We also experience significant competition from the in-house capabilities of our current and potential customers, such as BAE and Honeywell.
 
Patents and Trademarks
 
In order to protect our intellectual property rights, we rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements. We consider the protection of our patents, proprietary technology and trademarks to be an important element of our business. We also limit access to and distribution of our proprietary information. While we believe that in the aggregate our patents and trademarks are important to our operations, we do not believe that one or any group of them is so important that its termination would materially affect us.
 
Manufacturing
 
We operate under a “fabless” semiconductor manufacturing model, outsourcing substantially all semiconductor fabrication activities to commercial foundries, which significantly reduces our capital expenditures and labor costs and enhances our ability to respond quickly with scalability to changes in technology and customer demands. We purchase our semiconductors from a variety of foundries, which utilize our proprietary design specifications and packaging techniques to manufacture our RadHard products. We test our RadHard products in our in-house radiation simulation testing chamber.
 
We manufacture products for aerospace and defense programs in compliance with stringent military specifications. Most of our manufacturing plants are ISO-9001 certified, and our Plainview, NY,New York, Hauppauge, NYNew York, and Colorado Springs, COColorado, facilities are also certified to the more stringent AS9100 standard.
 
64
AMS has nine11 primary manufacturing facilities throughout the United States and China. AMS’ largest facility, Colorado Springs, CO, designs and develops our RadHard solutions in addition to a broad range of products for avionics and space applications. AMS manufactures advanced MCMs for airborne, space, shipboard, ground based and commercial avionics and telecommunications systems in its Plainview, NYNew York, facility. The remaining facilities focus on RFMW and aerospace motion control solutions.
 
ATS has eight8 primary manufacturing facilities throughout the United States, Great Britain and France. Its largest facility, Wichita, KS, designs and develops a wide range of test instrumentation for military radio and avionics. ATS’ Stevenage, England facility focuses on wireless systems test technologies and also provides test solutions with expertise in signal generators, signal analyzers, microwaves and automatic test equipment. ATS’ Cambridge, England facilities focus exclusively on wireless system test technologies. The remaining facilities focus on synthetic testing solutions and other broadband communications testing equipment.
 
Many of the component parts we use in our products are purchased, including semiconductors, transformers, and amplifiers. Although we have several sole source arrangements, all the materials and components we use, including those purchased from a sole source, are readily available and are or can be purchased in the open market. We have no long-term purchase commitments and no supplier provided more than 10% of our raw materials during fiscal 2008.2009.
 
Seasonality

Although our business is not affected by seasonality, historically our revenues and earnings increase sequentially from quarter to quarter within a fiscal year, but the first quarter is typically less than the previous year’s fourth quarter.

Our Employees
 
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we had approximately 2,6252,700 employees, of whom 1,4501,300 were employed in a manufacturing capacity, and 1,1751,400 were employed in engineering, sales, administrative or clerical positions. Approximately 10090 of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The collective bargaining agreement expires September 30, 2010. We believe that our employee relations are satisfactory.

 
57

Regulation
 
Our operations are subject to various federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws, ordinances and regulations that limit discharges into the environment, establish standards for the handling, generation, use, emission, release, discharge, treatment, storage and disposal of, or exposure to, hazardous materials, substances and waste, and require cleanup of contaminated soil and groundwater. These laws, ordinances and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. Many of them provide for substantial fines and penalties, orders (including orders to cease operations) and criminal sanctions for violations. They may also impose liability for property damage and personal injury stemming from the presence of, or exposure to, hazardous substances.
 
We believe that we are in material compliance with all environmental laws, do not anticipate any material expenditure to meet current or pending environmental requirements, and generally believe that our processes and products do not present any unusual environmental concerns. We are unaware of any existing, pending, or threatened contingent liability that may have a material adverse effect on our ongoing business operations.
 
Our operations are also governed by laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and worker health and regulations.health.  We believe we are in material compliance with these laws and regulations and do not believe that future compliance with such laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. We also believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable labor regulations.
 
We are subject to International Traffic in Arms Regulation, or ITAR.  ITAR requires export licenses from the U.S. Department of State for products shipped outside the U.S. that have military or strategic applications.  In this connection, we have filed certain Voluntary Disclosures with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, U.S. Department of State, describing possible inadvertent violations (see “Legal Proceedings”).

The Company is involved in various other ITAR related matters, including some recently identified with the prior practices of a recently acquired business, which may warrant disclosure with the U.S. Department of State.  Although we are in the process of addressing these matters, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately correct all possible ITAR violations.  Compliance with the directives of the U.S. Department of State may result in substantial legal and other expenses and the diversion of management time.  In the event that a determination is made that we have violated ITAR with respect to any matters, we may be subject to substantial monetary penalties that we are unable to quantify at this time, and/or suspension or revocation of our export privileges and criminal sanctions, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Government Contracting Regulations
 
Because we have contracts with the federal government and its agencies, we are subject to audit from time to time for our compliance with government regulations by various agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”). The DCAA reviews the adequacy of, and a contractor’s compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. The DCAA has the right to perform audits on our incurred costs on all contracts on a yearly basis. An adverse finding under a DCAA audit could result in the disallowance of our costs under a government contract, termination of a government contract, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension and prohibition from doing business with the U.S. government. In the event that an audit by the DCAA results in disallowance of our costs under a contract, we have the right to appeal the findings of the audit under applicable dispute resolution provisions. Approval of submitted yearly contract incurred costs can take from one to three years from the date of submission of the contract costs.
 
Other governmental agencies, including the Defense Securities Service and the Defense Logistics Agency, may also, from time to time, conduct inquiries or investigations regarding a broad range of our activities.
 
65
Our principal products or services do not require any governmental approval, except for the requirement that we obtain export licenses for certain of our products.
 
Properties and Facilities

Our headquarters are located in Plainview, Long Island, New York, where we have approximately 90,000 square feet of space, including manufacturing space, that is utilized by both AMS and ATS.  We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current and presently foreseeable needs and that we will be able to renew or replace our expiring leases on our rental properties on commercially reasonable terms. The following table sets forth information concerning the significant properties owned or leased by us.

 
58

Location
 
Owned/Leased
 
Approximate
Square Footage
  
Expiration
of Lease
 
Ann Arbor, Michigan Owned  32,000  N/A 
Cambridge, England Leased  14,000  2011 
Colorado Springs, Colorado Owned  102,000 
 
N/A 
Cupertino, California Leased  16,000 
 
2009
 
Elancourt, France Leased  14,000 
 
2009
 
Frederick, Maryland Leased  32,000 
 
2011
 
Gothenburg, Sweden Leased  5,000  2011
 
Hauppauge, Long Island, New York Leased  47,000  2010 
Londonderry, New Hampshire Leased  37,000  2012 
Nanjing, China Leased  10,000  2009 
New Century, Kansas Owned  20,000  N/A 
New Century, Kansas Leased  38,000  2009
 
Plainview, Long Island, New York Owned  69,000  N/A
 
Plainview, Long Island, New York Leased  21,000  2013
 
Powell, Ohio Leased  20,000  2011
 
Stevenage, England Owned  142,000  N/A
 
Sunnyvale, California Leased  20,000  2012
 
Whippany, New Jersey Owned  57,000  N/A
 
Wichita, Kansas Owned  156,000  N/A 
    Approximate Expiration of 
Location Owned/Leased Square Footage Lease 
        
AMS Segment Properties       
Ann Arbor, Michigan Owned 32,000 N/A 
Colorado Springs, Colorado Owned 102,000 N/A 
Frederick, Maryland Leased 32,000 2011 
Gothenburg, Sweden Leased 5,000 2011 
Hauppauge, Long Island, New York Leased 47,000 2010 
Londonderry, New Hampshire Leased 43,000 2012 
Lawrence, Massachusetts Leased 57,000 2014 
Nanjing, China Leased 22,000 2009 
Naples, Florida Leased 41,000 2013 
Plainview, Long Island, New York Owned 69,000 N/A 
Plainview, Long Island, New York Leased 21,000 2013 
Sunnyvale, California Leased 20,000 2012 
Whippany, New Jersey Owned 57,000 N/A 
        
ATS Segment Properties       
Austin, Texas Leased 10,000 2010 
Cambridge, England Leased 14,000 2011 
Cupertino, California Leased 16,000 2014 
Elancourt, France Leased 14,000 2010 
Lenexa, Kansas Leased 54,000 2015 
Plainview, Long Island, New York Owned 69,000 N/A 
Plainview, Long Island, New York Leased 21,000 2013 
Powell, Ohio Leased 20,000 2011 
Stevenage, England Owned 142,000 N/A 
Wichita, Kansas Owned 156,000 N/A 

Legal Proceedings

In March 2005, we sold the net assets of our shock and vibration control device manufacturing business (“VMC”).  Under the terms of the sale agreements, we retained certain liabilities relating to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the premises occupied by VMC as of the date of sale.  We are involved in various claims and legal actionsrecorded a liability for the estimated remediation costs related to adverse environmental conditions that arise inexisted at the ordinary courseVMC premises when it was sold.  The accrued environmental liability at June 30, 2009 is $1.3 million, of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.which $322,000 is expected to be paid within one year.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we became aware that certain RadHard bidirectional multipurpose transceivers sold by us since 1999 may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”).ITAR. Accordingly, we filed a Voluntary Disclosure with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, U.S. Department of State, describing the details of the possible inadvertent misclassification. Simultaneously, we filed a Commodity Jurisdiction request providing detailed information and data supporting our contention that the product is not subject to ITAR and requesting a determination that such product is not ITAR controlled. By letter datedOn November 15, 2007, we were informed that the U.S. Department of State had determined in response to our Commodity Jurisdiction request, that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with ITAR. We requested reconsideration of this determination. On February 7, 2008, we filed an addendum to the above referenced Voluntary Disclosure advising the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls that other products sold by us, similar in nature to the transceiver described above, may also be subject to the ITAR. The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls agreed to extend our time to file such addendum to the Voluntary Disclosure until a decision was rendered with respect to our request for reconsideration of the determination in connection with the above-referenced Commodity Jurisdiction request. On August 5, 2008, we received a letter from the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (“DTCC”) requesting that we provide documentation and/or information relating to our compliance initiatives after November 15, 2007 as well as the results of any product reviews conducted by us, and indicating that a civil penalty against us could be warranted in connection with this matter following the review of such materials. We have provided all of the materials and documentation requested by the DTCC.  Our request for reconsideration was denied by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls on August 19, 2008 which determined that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of State in accordance with ITAR. Accordingly, on September 18, 2008, we filed an addendum to our Voluntary Disclosure identifying other products that may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with the ITAR but were inadvertently misclassified.  At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us or the materiality of any outcome.

 
6659
 

During May 2008, we became further aware that a certain product sold by our KDI subsidiary may have inadvertently been misclassified as notThe Company is involved in various other ITAR controlled. On August 5, 2008, we filed a Voluntary Disclosurerelated matters, including some recently identified with the Directorateprior practices of Defense Trade Controls,a recently acquired business, which have been disclosed, or may warrant disclosure, with the U.S. Department of State, describingState.  Although we are in the inadvertent misclassificationprocess of this product. At this time, it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penaltiesaddressing these matters, we cannot assure you that we will be asserted against us with respectable to the foregoing matters, or the materiality of any outcome.
During November 2008, we became aware that our Hauppauge facility had shipped twoadequately correct all possible ITAR controlled products to a foreign customer, but inadvertently had noted on the requisite paperwork that only one ITAR controlled product was included in the shipment.  We intend to file a voluntary disclosureviolations. Compliance with the Directoratedirectives of Defense Trade Controls, U.S. Department of State, informing them of this mistake.  At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us, or the materiality of any outcome.
During January 2009, we became aware that a certain product sold by our Powell subsidiary, for which an ITAR marketing license had been properly issued by the U.S. Department of State mistakenly was taken outmay result in substantial legal and other expenses and the diversion of management time.  In the country by an employee without first obtaining the required U.S. Customs signature upon departure.   We intendevent that a determination is made that we have violated ITAR with respect to file a voluntary disclosure shortly advising the U.S. Department of State of this mistake. Atany matters, we may be subject to substantial monetary penalties that we are unable to quantify at this time, it isand/or suspension or revocation of our export privileges and criminal sanctions, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us, orbelieve that the materialityultimate resolution of any outcome.of these actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

An amended class action complaint was filed against us and our board of directors on June 20, 2007 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County. The complaint alleges that our board breached its fiduciary duties to our stockholders (i) by issuing a preliminary proxy statement on June 5, 2007 that was issued in connection with seeking stockholder approval of the Acquisition and (ii) in approving certain amendments, that are allegedly beyond the scope of our corporate powers, to our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the employment agreements of defendants Harvey R. Blau, our then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Leonard Borow, our then President and Chief Operating Officer. We are currently in settlement discussions with the plaintiffs and have accrued an insignificant liability for the settlement.

67

MANAGEMENT
 
Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC. In addition, the table sets forth information regarding our senior management.
 
Name
 
Age
 
Position
Leonard Borow 61 President and Chief Executive Officer; Member of our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC
John Buyko 4849 Executive Vice President and President of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions; Member of our board of directors
John Adamovich, Jr. 5556 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary
Charles Badlato 50 Vice-President — Treasurer
Carl Caruso 65 Vice-President — Manufacturing
Robert B. McKeon 5455 Chairman of our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC
Hugh Evans 4041 Member of our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC
Ramzi M. Musallam 4041 Member of our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC
Prescott H. Ashe 4142 Member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC
Joe Benavides 3738 Member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC
Bradley J. Gross 36 Member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC
John D. Knoll 3738 Member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC
 
Leonard Borow is our President and Chief Executive Officer. He has been our employee in various executive positions since November 1989: Chief Executive Officer since August 2007, President since August 2005, Chief Operating Officer since October 1991 and a director since November 1992. Mr. Borow has served as a member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC since August 2007. From February 2004 until August 2005, Mr. Borow was one of our Vice Chairmen and from October 1991 until February 2004, Mr. Borow was our Executive Vice President. Prior to joining us, Mr. Borow was President of Comstron Corporation, a manufacturer of fast switching frequency synthesizers and components, which we acquired in November 1989.

 
60

John Buyko has been employed by us in various executive positions since January 1991 and has been our Executive Vice President since December 2006, Vice President since August 2005 and President of our AMS division since September 2001. Mr. Buyko has also served as a member of our board of directors since August 2007. From December 1998 until June 2001, Mr. Buyko was Senior Vice President-Marketing and Sales of AMS.
 
John Adamovich, Jr. has been employed by us as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since November 2005 and Secretary since August 2007. From November 2004 until May 2005, Mr. Adamovich was employed by Rainbow Media Enterprises, a subsidiary of Cablevision Systems Corporation, as its Executive Vice President and CFO. From January 1998 until November 2004, Mr. Adamovich was employed by Pall Corporation as its Group Vice President, Treasurer and CFO. From July 1975 until December 1997, Mr. Adamovich was employed by KPMG LLP, becoming a partner in 1986. Mr. Adamovich is licensed as a certified public accountant in the State of New York.
 
Charles Badlato has been employed by us in various financial positions since December 1987 and has been our Vice President since February 2004 and Treasurer since February 1994. From May 1981 until December 1987, Mr. Badlato was employed by various certified public accounting firms, most recently as an audit manager with Touche Ross & Co.  Mr. Badlato is licensed as a certified public accountant in the State of New York.
 
Carl Caruso has been employed by us as Vice President of Aeroflex Plainview, Inc. since November 1989 and has been our Vice President—Manufacturing since February 1997. Prior to joining us, Mr. Caruso was Vice President of Comstron Corporation, which we acquired in November 1989.
68
 
Robert B. McKeon has served as the Chairman of our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent, and the board of managers of the parent LLC since August 2007.  Mr. McKeon is the Founder and Chairman of Veritas Capital, a New York-based private equity investment firm he formed in 1992.  Prior to forming Veritas in 1992, Mr. McKeon served as the Chairman of Wasserstein Perella Management Partners where he was a founding partner of Wasserstein Perella & Co. in 1988, and was instrumental in raising and managing the group’s $1.1 billion private equity fund.  Mr. McKeon currently serves as Chairman of the Board of DynCorp International, Vangent Inc., and McNeil Technologies.  Mr. McKeon is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, The Bretton Woods Committee, and the Center for Strategic & International Studies.  Mr. McKeon is also on the Board of Trustees of Fordham University.  Mr. McKeon holds a B.S. from Fordham University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

Hugh Evans has served as a member of our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC since August 2007. Mr. Evans is a Partner at Veritas Capital. Prior to joining Veritas in 2005, Mr. Evans was a Partner at Falconhead Capital, a middle market private equity firm. While at Falconhead, Mr. Evans was a member of the firm’s investment committee. Prior to Falconhead, Mr. Evans was a Principal at Stonington Partners. Mr. Evans began his private equity career in 1992 at Merrill Lynch Capital Partners, the predecessor firm of Stonington, which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch. Mr. Evans received an A.B. from Harvard University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
 
Ramzi M. Musallam has served as a member of our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC since August 2007. Mr. Musallam is a partner at Veritas Capital, which he has been associated with since 1997. He is a member of the boards of directors of DynCorp International Inc., Vangent, Inc. and several private companies. Mr. Musallam holds a Bachelor’s degree from Colgate University with a major in Economics and Mathematics and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
 
Prescott H. Ashe has served as a member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC since August 2007. Since 2000, he has been a Managing Director of Golden Gate Capital. Prior to joining Golden Gate, Mr. Ashe was an investment professional at Bain Capital, which he initially joined in 1991. Prior to Bain Capital, Mr. Ashe was a consultant at Bain & Company. Mr. Ashe received his J.D. from Stanford Law School and his Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of California at Berkeley. He is currently a director of several other private companies in which Golden Gate is an investor.
 
Joe Benavides has served as a member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC since August 2007. Mr. Benavides is a Principal at Veritas Capital. Prior to joining Veritas Capital, Mr. Benavides was a Managing Director at The Blackstone Group. Prior to Blackstone, Mr. Benavides was most recently a Vice President in the Financial Sponsors Group at Credit Suisse First Boston. Mr. Benavides received a B.S. in Economics with a concentration in Finance from the Georgia Institute of Technology and an M.B.A. in Finance from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
 
61

Bradley J. Gross has served as a member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC since August 2007.  Mr. Gross is a Managing Director in the Principal Investment Area of Goldman, Sachs & Co., where he has led and executed investments in a wide range of industries, including aerospace, consumer products, retail, healthcare, and financial institutions, a position he has held since 2007. Mr. Gross also has experience investing both within and outside the U.S., including positions in both the Hong Kong and Tokyo offices of Goldman, Sachs & Co.  He first joined Goldman, Sachs & Co. in 1995.  Mr. Gross received a B.A. from Duke University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. He currently serves on the board of directors of MoneyGram International, Inc., Griffon Corporation, Capmark Financial Group, and several other private companies in which Goldman, Sachs & Co. is an investor.
 
John D. Knoll has served as a member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC since August 2007. Since 2000, Mr. Knoll has been an employee of Golden Gate Capital, where he serves as  a Principal. Prior to Golden Gate, Mr. Knoll worked at Covad Communications as a product manager. Prior to joining Covad, Mr. Knoll was a Consultant with Bain & Company, and worked in its private equity group.  Mr. Knoll holds an M.B.A. from Stanford University Graduate School of Business and a M.S. and B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Stanford University. He is currently a director of several other private companies in which Golden Gate is an investor.

 
69
Board Composition
 
The board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC isare each composed of eight directors. Pursuant to a limited liability company agreement among the Sponsors, certain members of our management and the parent LLC, (i) Veritas Capital has the right to elect four members of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC, (ii) Golden Gate has the right to elect two members of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC, (iii) GS Direct, an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., has the right to elect one member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC and (iv) our chief executive officer serves as a member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC during the term of his employment. The rights of Veritas Capital, Golden Gate and GS Direct to elect members of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC are subject to such entities holding certain specified percentages of the equity interests of the parent LLC.  All of the members of our board of directors also serve on the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC, with the exception of Mr. Buyko.
Because of these requirements, together with the parent’s and the parent LLC’s controlling ownership interest in our Company, we do not have a separately-designated standing nominating committee for the consideration of director nominees or any policies or procedures with respect to shareholder recommendations for nominees to our board of directors.
 
We provide director and officersofficer liability insurance for our officers and directors and directors of the parentparent.
Director Independence
As a result of their affiliations with the Sponsors and managersus, none of our directors are independent.
Meeting and Attendance
Our board has an active role in overseeing management.  Directors are expected to attend all board meetings.  During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, there were 4 meetings of the parent LLC.board of directors.  All of the directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate meetings of the board.
Audit and Compensation Committees
We do not have separately-designated standing compensation or audit committees. The entire board of directors functions as our compensation and audit committees, and no written charter governs the actions of the board of directors when performing the functions that would generally be performed by these respective committees.  As a closely held company with no publicly trading market for our common stock, our board of directors has not designated any member of the board an “audit committee financial expert.”
62

Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics which applies to our chief executive officer and senior financial officers.   Pursuant to the code of ethics our chief executive officer and senior financial officers agree to abide by principles governing their professional and ethical conduct.  The code of ethics is posted on our website at www.aeroflex.com.  We intend to disclose on our website any amendments to or waivers of this code of ethics.
 
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
 
Our entire board of directors functions as our compensation committee.  None of our executive officers has a relationship that would constitute an interlocking relationship with executive officers or directors of another entity or insider participation in compensation decisions.

 
70

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

On August 15, 2007, the date of the Acquisition, we ceased being a public company subject to SEC and NASDAQ rules.  Prior to that date, we had a Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors composed solely of independent directors that was responsible for the decisions regarding executive compensation.

Subsequent to the Acquisition, the new Board of Directors, or the “Board,” became responsible for the oversight of our executive compensation programs and policies.  The Board is composed of three non-employee directors and two executive officers.  The executive officers on the Board are excluded from the decision making process with respect to themselves.  Responsibilities of the Board with respect to executive compensation include the suggestion, review and approval of the following items:

-Executive compensation strategy and philosophy;
-Compensation arrangements for executive management, including salary and bonus;
-Design and implementation of our equity incentive program;
-Executive benefits and perquisites; and
-Any other executive compensation or benefit related items.

General Policies

Our compensation programs are intended to enable us to attract, motivate, reward and retain the management talent required to achieve our corporate objectives, and thereby increase shareholder value.  The Board considers that executive compensation should not only be competitive in amount, but also be closely aligned with the long-term interests of the stakeholders which the Board represents while encouraging long-term executive retention.  It is our policy to provide incentives to our senior management to achieve both short-term and long-term objectives and to reward exceptional performance and contributions to the development of our business.  To attain these objectives, our executive compensation program includes a competitive base salary, an incentive cash bonus and equity-based compensation.

From time to time, the Board may utilize the services of independent consultants to perform analyses and to make recommendations to the Board relative to executive compensation matters.  During 2008,fiscal 2009, the Board was not advised by a compensation consultant regarding compensation matters.  No compensation consultant is paid on a retainer basis.  The recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer are also solicited by the Board with respect to compensation for named executives other than the Chief Executive Officer.  “Named executives” refers to those executive officers named on the Summary Compensation Table that immediately follows this discussion, other than Harvey R. Blau, whose employment with us ceased upon the consummation of the Acquisition.discussion.

Base Salary

Each of the named executives is a party to an employment agreement with the Company.  Salary is based on an executive’s level of responsibility and experience, individual performance and vulnerability to recruitment by other companies.  In 2008,fiscal 2009, the Board adjusted the base salaries of each executive based on changes in the marketplace, the general cost of living and each executive’s individual performance.  The average base salary increase in 2008fiscal 2009 for our named executive officers was approximately 5%.
63

Incentive Bonus Plan

The purpose of the incentive bonus plan is to reward participating executives for achieving the annual goals of the Company, which in turn allow it to achieve itspromotes the Board’s long-term goal of enhancing shareholder value.  The Board uses Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization or Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in our credit agreement, to measure the performance of the Company. Adjustments to GAAP EBITDA is adjusted for certain items that the Board believes are outside of the control of the executives and therefore should not be used as a measurement of achievement.  These itemspermitted by our credit agreement include stock-based compensation, certain expenses related to the Acquisition, advisory fees paid to the Sponsors, certain adjustments arising solely as a result of the Acquisition and the impact of fair value adjustments of our assets and liabilities, restructuring costs and restructuring costs.impairment of goodwill and other intangibles.  Our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President each receive, pursuant to their employment agreements, an annual bonus of between 50% and 150% of his base salary based upon our achievement of certain Adjusted EBITDA targets established by our Board. ��Our Chief Financial Officer receives, pursuant to an amendment to his employment agreement entered into in September 2009, an annual bonus of between 33.33% and 100% of his base salary based upon our achievement of certain Adjusted EBITDA targets established by our Board.  At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Board establishes a target Adjusted EBITDA based on management projections.  Each of the aforementioned executives receivesOur Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President each  receive a bonus of 100% of base salary if the target is achieved, 50% of base salary for a minimum acceptable Adjusted EBITDA level and 150% of base salary for achievement of a maximum target Adjusted EBITDA.  Our Chief Financial Officer receives a bonus of 100% of base salary for achievement of a maximum target Adjusted EBITDA and 33.33% of base salary for achievement of  a minimum acceptable Adjusted EBITDA level. A sliding scale is used to determine bonuses when Adjusted EBITDA is between the minimum and maximum amounts. The Board believes these targets are aggressive but achievable, requiring strong performance and execution.  Other named executive officers receive discretionary annual bonuses that are based on this same Adjusted EBITDA target.  These bonuses are suggested by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Board based not only on the achievement of targets, but also the respective individual’s performance.

71

Parent LLC Class A Member Interests

In connection with the Merger,Acquisition, certain members of management were invited to invest in parent LLC, which owns all of the common stock of our parent.  This permits the executives to share in the increase in the value of the Company and is intended to focus their efforts on our long-term results.  The primary equity interest in parent LLC are the Class A member interests, of which a substantial controlling interest is owned by the Sponsors. The Class A member interests include a special distribution of up to 50% of management’s investment pursuant to the limited liability company operating agreement, providing a special incentive to management not available to the Sponsors. As a group, management owns 2.50% of the Class A membership interests.

Parent LLC Class B Member Interests

Certain members of our management have been granted Class B member interests in the parent LLC.  Pursuant to the terms of the limited liability company operating agreement governing the parent LLC, the holders of Class B member interests are entitled to receive a percentage of all distributions, if any, made by the parent LLC after (x) the holders of the Class A members in the parent LLC, including the Sponsors, have received a return of their invested capital plus a 12% per annum internal rate of return (compounded annually) on their invested capital and (y) certain members of our management that received Class A interests for their capital contributions to the parent LLC have received a special distribution in the aggregate amount of approximately $3.2 million, together with a 12% per annum internal rate of return (compounded annually). The Class B member interests are intended to provide incentive to management to keep focused on the long-term value of the Company.  The member interests were allocated based on the executive’s relative position and responsibilities.  These Class B member interests are non-transferable and vest ratably over five years, which provides a retention incentive.  If and when fully vested, the Class B shares will represent 8.73%8.6% ownership in the parent LLC.

Aeroflex Incorporated Employees’ 401(k) Plan

Generally, all employees based in the United States, including the named executive officers, are eligible to participate in the Aeroflex 401(k) plan after they have completed six months of service.  Employees contribute a portion of their salary to the 401(k) plan and, up until June 30, 2009, the Company matchesmatched 50% of the first eight percent of eligible salary an employee contributescontributed to the plan.  The discretionary match has been suspended at this time.

64

Executive Benefits and Perquisites

In order to offer a competitive package to attract and retain strong executives, we provide various benefits and perquisites to certain members of management. These include a deferred compensation plan, leased autos, car expenses or car allowances, ten hours personal use of company jet timeshare (with reimbursement by the employee of the minimum amount of income imputed for such use as determined under applicable Federal and State rules and regulations), an executive medical reimbursement plan and split dollar life insurance agreements.  Each executive receives a different package of benefits.

Post-termination Benefits

Certain of the named executives have terms in their employment contracts which provide for payments upon termination.  The Chief Executive Officer also receives a consulting agreement for three years following his termination at two-thirds of his salary plus bonus and certain benefits.  See “2008 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Tax and Accounting Implications

As part of its responsibilities with respect to executive compensation, the Board considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which, in some circumstances, limits the Company’s tax deduction for compensation to certain individuals to $1,000,000 per year.  Since the Company was privately held as of December 31, 2008, it was not subject to Section 162(m).  In past years, when the Company’s stock was publicly traded and Section 162(m) was applicable, the relevant executives were subject to employment contract terms which required them to defer any compensation in excess of the $1,000,000 to a Deferred Compensation Plan.  Such deferral would be payable to the employee upon termination of employment and under certain other circumstances.  Once we are subject to Section 162(m) again, we will once again address these limits.

72

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information with respect to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of the three other most highly compensated executive officers and the former Chief Executive Officer for fiscal 20082009 in each case excluding any pre-Acquisition equity based compensation.
 
65

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal
Position
 
Year
  
Salary
(1)
  
Bonus
($)
  
Stock
Awards
 ($) (2)
  
Option
Awards
 ($)
  
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
 ($) (3)
  
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
(4)
  
All Other
Compensation
($) (5)
  
Total ($)
 
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 
                            
Leonard Borow
President and Chief
Executive Officer
  
2008
2007
  $
522,452
  446,406
  $
-
  -
  $
3,360,688
  -
  $
-
  -
  $658,193  2,057,097  $
45,000
 636,723
  $21,734,585  33,464  $
26,320,918
 3,173,690
 
John Buyko
Executive Vice President and President of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions
  
2008
 2007
  $
422,467
  340,158
  $
-
  600,250
  $
2,800,573
  -
   
-
 -
  $
532,823
   -
  $
-
  -
  $
119,050
  7,500
  $
3,874,913 
947,908
 
John Adamovich, Jr.
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
  
2008
 2007
  $
437,114
  423,534
  $
360,000
  400,000
  $
448,092
 -
   
-
 -
   
-
  -
  $
1,183
 -
  $
68,064
  8,800
  $
1,314,453
  832,334
 
Charles Badlato
Vice-President — 
Treasurer
  
2008
 2007
  $
250,546
  251,280
  $
180,000
200,250
  $
168,034
 -
   
-
 -
   
-
 -
  $
4,257
  34,053
  $3,167,480  16,580  $
3,770,317
  502,163
 
Carl Caruso
Vice-President — 
Manufacturing
  
2008
 2007
  $
285,334
307,549
  $
215,000
240,250
  $
168,034
 -
   
-
 -
   
-
 -
  $
-
  -
  $
666,035
  19,486
  $
1,334,403
  567,285
 
Harvey R. Blau
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  
2008
  2007
  $
89,527
 350,792
  $
-
  -
  $
-
  -
  $
-
  -
  $
-
  2,057,097
  $
39,215
  532,630
  $6,723,947  30,421  $
6,852,689
  2,970,940
 
                   Change in       
                   Pension Value       
                   and Nonqualified       
                Non-Equity  Deferred       
          Stock  Option  Incentive Plan  Compensation  All Other    
Name and Principal   Salary  Bonus  Awards  Awards  Compensation  Earnings ($)  Compensation    
Position
 
Year
 
(1)
  
($) (2)
  
($) (3)
  
($)
  
($) (4)
  
(5)
  
($) (6)
  
Total ($)
 
(a) (b) (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 
                             
Leonard Borow 2009 $550,507  $-  $-  $-  Note (4)  $-  $672,463  $1,222,970 
President and Chief 2008  522,452   -   3,360,688   -   658,193   45,000   21,734,585   26,320,918 
Executive Officer 2007  446,406   -   -   -   2,057,097   636,723   33,464   3,173,690 
                                   
John Buyko 2009 $472,816  $-  $-  $-  Note (4)  $-  $8,048  $480,864 
Executive Vice 2008  422,467   -   2,800,573   -   532,823   -   119,050   3,874,913 
President and 2007  340,158   600,250   -   -   -   -   7,500   947,908 
President of Aeroflex                                  
Microelectronic                                  
Solutions                                  
                                   
John Adamovich, Jr. 2009 $455,083  Note (2)  $-�� $-  $-  $4,157  $9,446  $468,686 
Senior Vice President, 2008  437,114   360,000   448,092   -   -   1,183   68,064   1,314,453 
Chief Financial Officer 2007  423,534   400,000   -   -   -   -   8,800   832,334 
and Secretary                                  
                                   
Charles Badlato 2009 $254,324  Note (2)  $-  $-  $-  $-  $121,901  $376,225 
Vice President - 2008  250,546   180,000   168,034   -   -   4,257   3,167,480   3,770,317 
Treasurer 2007  251,280   200,250   -   -   -   34,053   16,580   502,163 
                                   
Carl Caruso 2009 $311,472  Note (2)  $-  $-  $-  $-  $603,821  $915,293 
Vice President - 2008  285,334   215,000   168,034   -   -   -   666,035   1,334,403 
Manufacturing 2007  307,549   240,250   -   -   -   -   19,486   567,285 
 
(1)
“Salary” includes contributions to our 401(k) Plan by each of the executive officers listed below for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, as follows:
 
Name
 
2008
  
2007
  2009  2008  2007 
Leonard Borow $20,500  $20,500  $22,000  $20,500  $20,500 
John Buyko  15,500   15,500   16,500   15,500   15,500 
John Adamovich, Jr.  29,115   23,587   21,347   29,115   23,587 
Charles Badlato  15,707   15,435   28,896   15,707   15,435 
Carl Caruso  19,977   21,409   25,821   19,977   21,409 
Harvey R. Blau  -   - 

(2)The final allocation of bonuses with respect to fiscal 2009 have not been determined as of the date of this filing.  The final determination is expected to occur in October 2009.

(3)“Stock Awards” includes the value of parent LLC Class B Member Interests awarded to the named executives.  The amounts disclosed for fiscal 2008 are based on the grant date fair value of the entire award as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R).  The Class B member interests vest ratably over five years.

73
(3)(4)“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” includes incentive bonuses payable to the certain executives based on operating results pursuant to their respective employment agreements.  The compensation identified in this column for fiscal 2008 was based on the achievement of a targeted level of Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by the employment agreements.  The amounts for fiscal 2009 have not been formally finalized as of the date of this filing. The final determination is expected to occur in September 2009.

66

(4)(5)“Changes in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” for Fiscal 2008 does not reflect earnings on the deferred compensation balancesbalance of Messrs.Mr. Borow, and Blau, as their balanceshis balance decreased by $35,173 and $28,641, respectively.$35,173.
 
(5)           “All Other Compensation” for fiscal 2008
(6)“All Other Compensation” for fiscal 2009 includes:
 
(i) for Mr. Borow, (a) a payment for a covenant not to compete of $3,700,000, made in connection with the Acquisition, (b) a one-time bonus award in connection with the Acquisition of $886,590, (c) a payment of $14,085,887, including interest through
(i) for Mr. Borow, (a) interest of $433,803 for the period from June 30, 2008 on a payment due in exchange for relinquishing his change in control rights under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that was terminated at the time of the Acquisition (the payment due was reported in 2008), (b) a tax gross-up, on the amount specified in (a) above, of $203,195, (c) $18,691 imputed value of a leased automobile, and (d) a tax gross-up, on the amount specified in (c) above, of $1,903,130, (e) the $1,112,248 fair value, as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of a discount on the purchase of parent LLC Class A member interests in the form of a special distribution, (f) $25,749 imputed value of a leased automobile, and (g) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000;
 
(ii) for Mr. Buyko, (a) the $111,225 fair value, as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of a discount on the purchase of parent LLC Class A member interests in the form of a special distribution and (b) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000;
(ii) for Mr. Buyko, $8,048 in company matching funds under the Aeroflex Incorporated Employees’ 401(k) Plan;
 
(iii) for Mr. Adamovich, (a) the $55,612 fair value, as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of a discount on the purchase of parent LLC Class A member interests in the form of a special distribution and (b) $12,452
(iii) for Mr. Adamovich, $9,446 in company matching funds under the Aeroflex Incorporated Employees’ 401(k) Plan;
 
 (iv)  for Mr. Badlato, (a) the $22,245 fair value, as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of a discount on the purchase of Parent LLC Class A member interest in the form of a special distribution, (b) a payment of $3,128,276, including interest through
(iv)  for Mr. Badlato, (a) interest of $99,522 for the period from June 30, 2008, on a payment due in exchange for relinquishing his change in control rights under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that was terminated at the time of the Acquisition (the payment due was reported in 2008), (b) $13,248 in company matching funds under the Aeroflex Incorporated Employees’ 401(k) Plan, and (c) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000;
 
(v) for Mr. Caruso, (a) a one-time bonus award in connection with the Acquisition of $648,450,
(v) for Mr. Caruso, (a) a one-time payment of $580,839 made in exchange for relinquishing his right to a consulting agreement at the end of his employment,  (b) $13,161 in company matching funds under the Aeroflex Incorporated Employees’ 401(k) Plan, and (b) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000; and

(vi) for Mr. Blau, (a) a severance payment of $4,266,839 in connection with the change in control which occurred as a result of the Acquisition and his subsequent retirement in accordance with his employment agreement, (b) a tax gross-up, on the amount specified in (a) above, of $2,424,028, (c) $26,794 imputed value of a leased automobile, and (d) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000.
 
“All Other Compensation” for fiscal 2008 includes:
(i) for Mr. Borow, (a) a payment for a covenant not to compete of $3,700,000, made in connection with the Acquisition, (b) a one-time bonus award in connection with the Acquisition of $886,590, (c) a payment of $14,085,887, including interest through June 30, 2008, due in exchange for relinquishing his change in control rights under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that was terminated at the time of the Acquisition, (d) a tax gross-up, on the amount specified in (c) above, of $1,903,130, (e) the $1,112,248 fair value, as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of a discount on the purchase of parent LLC Class A member interests in the form of a special distribution, (f) $25,749 imputed value of a leased automobile, and (g) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000;
(ii) for Mr. Buyko, (a) the $111,225 fair value, as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of a discount on the purchase of parent LLC Class A member interests in the form of a special distribution and (b) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000;
(iii) for Mr. Adamovich, (a) the $55,612 fair value, as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of a discount on the purchase of parent LLC Class A member interests in the form of a special distribution and (b) $12,452 in company matching funds under the Aeroflex Incorporated Employees’ 401(k) Plan;
(iv)  for Mr. Badlato, (a) the $22,245 fair value, as calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of a discount on the purchase of Parent LLC Class A member interest in the form of a special distribution, (b) a payment of $3,128,276, including interest through June 30, 2008, due in exchange for relinquishing his change in control rights under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that was terminated at the time of the Acquisition, and (c) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000;
(v) for Mr. Caruso, (a) a one-time bonus award in connection with the Acquisition of $648,450, and (b) other compensation and perquisites, none of which individually exceeded $10,000.

67

Employment Agreements
 
We are a party to employment agreements with each of our executive officers, the terms of which are set forth below.
 
Leonard Borow
 
We are a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Borow, our President and Chief Executive Officer, which expires on August 15, 2012. Mr. Borow currently receives a base salary of $555,000 and an annual bonus of between 50% and 150% of his base salary based upon our achievement of certain EBITDA targets established by our board of directors.
 
Mr. Borow’s employment agreement provides for a three-year consulting period after the termination of employment by expiration of the contract term, mutual agreement or retirement, during which time Mr. Borow will receive consulting payments in an annual amount equal to two-thirds of his last annual base salary.

74
 
In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Borow without cause or Mr. Borow terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Borow is entitled to receive his salary, an annual bonus and continuation of health benefits for the remainder of the contract term. For this purpose, the annual bonus will be calculated based on the average of Mr. Borow’s highest annual bonuses for a period not to exceed three years during the fiscal years (for a period not exceeding 10 years) commencing after August 15, 2007. In the event Mr. Borow’s employment is terminated for cause (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Borow will not be entitled to any severance benefits other than his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award. In the event of Mr. Borow’s death or disability, Mr. Borow or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award, and Mr. Borow or his beneficiary or estate is also entitled to any annual bonus for the current fiscal year based on our performance, prorated to the date of termination. In the event Mr. Borow’s employment terminates due to retirement, Mr. Borow shall be entitled to his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation, a prorated amount of any annual bonus for the fiscal year in which he retired and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award.
 
Mr. Borow is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions until the later of (i) August 15, 2012 and (ii) two years following the later of (a) the termination of his employment for any reason and (b) the three-year consulting period. In addition, we will provide Mr. Borow with a tax gross-up payment to cover any excise tax due under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
John Buyko
 
We are a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Buyko, our Executive Vice President and President of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, which provides for a term of employment endingexpires on August 15, 2012. Under the agreement, Mr. Buyko currently receives an annuala base salary of $450,000 and is eligible to receive an annual bonus of between 50% and 150% of his annualbase salary based upon theour achievement of certain EBITDA targets established by our board of directors. Our board of directors will review Mr. Buyko’s salary annually and may increase (but not decrease without his consent) Mr. Buyko’s salary in its discretion.
In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Buyko without cause or Mr. Buyko terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), heMr. Buyko is entitled to receive (i) his salary for the remainder of the employment term at the rate in effect immediately prior to such termination, (ii) continuation of health benefits until the earlier of December 31st of the second year following his termination of employment or his commencement of full-time employment with a new employer and (iii) annual bonuses for the remainder of the employment term (including a prorated bonus for any partial fiscal year) equal to the average of the highest annual bonuses for a period not to exceed three years awarded to him during the fiscal years (for a period not exceeding 10 years) commencing after August 15, 2007. In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Buyko for cause (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award. In the event of termination upon Mr. Buyko’s death or disability, Mr. Buyko or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive his salary through the date of determination,termination, unused vacation and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award, and he is also entitled to any annual bonus for the current fiscal year based on our performance, prorated to the date of termination.
 
68

In addition, Mr. Buyko is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions until the later of (i) the period during which Mr. Buyko is entitled to receive severance payments pursuant to the employment agreement and (ii) one year following the termination of his employment for any reason.
 
John Adamovich
 
We are a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Adamovich, our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary, which provides for a termone-year period of employment ending December 31, 2009.renewing daily unless either Mr. Adamovich or the Company provides notice of non-renewal, in which the employment period shall continue for one year from the date such notice is received by the non-renewing party.  Under the agreement, Mr. Adamovich currently receives an annual salary of $440,000.$440,000 and is eligible to receive an annual bonus of between 33.33% and 100% of his annual salary based upon the achievement of certain EBITDA targets established by our board of directors.  In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Adamovich within two years following a change in control (as defined in the employment agreement) without cause or Mr. Adamovich terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive (i) a lump sum severance payment, up to the maximum amount deductible under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, of 2.5 times the sum of his base salary and average annual bonuses received for our last three fiscal years, (ii) continuation of health benefits until December 31st of the second year following his termination of employment, and (iii) a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination.
 
In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Adamovich without cause, or if Mr. Adamovich terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive (i) his salary and benefits for one year following termination of employment.employment and (ii) any unpaid bonus applicable for the fiscal year in which the date of termination occurs, prorated to the date of termination, but in no event less than 50% of the bonus he would otherwise be entitled for that fiscal year had he not been terminated.  In the event of termination upon death or due to disability, Mr. Adamovich or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive 50% of his salary for one year following termination of employment.

 
The foregoing description of the employment agreement with Mr. Adamovich reflects an amendment thereto entered into in September 2009.
75
Charles Badlato
 
We are a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Badlato, our Vice President – Treasurer, under which Mr. Badlato’s term of employment will continue until we give him, or he gives us, written notice of an intention to terminate his employment upon a specified date. Under the agreement, Mr. Badlato currently receives an annual salary of $250,000.
 
In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Badlato without cause, or if  Mr. Badlato terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive his salary and benefits for one year following termination of employment. In the event of termination upon death or due to disability, Mr. Badlato or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive 50% of his salary for one year following termination of employment.
 
Carl Caruso
 
We are a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Caruso, our Vice President of Manufacturing, under which Mr. Caruso’s term of employment will continue until we give him, or he gives us, written notice of an intention to terminate his employment upon a specified date. Under the agreement, Mr. Caruso currently receives an annual salary of $290,000.  Prior to January 1, 2008, Mr. Caruso was paid the lump sum of $648,450 as consideration for the release of his option to terminate his employment upon our Acquisition by the parent on August 15, 2007.  In January 2009, Mr. Caruso received a payment of $580,839 in exchange for relinquishing his right to a consulting arrangement at the end of his employment.

In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Caruso without cause, or if Mr. Caruso terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive his salary and benefits for one year following termination of employment. In the event of termination upon death or due to disability, Mr. Caruso or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive 50% of his salary for one year following termination of employment.
 
Additional information with respect to potential payments to the executive officers pursuant to their respective employment agreements is contained below in “2008 Potential“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
 
69

FISCAL 20082009 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
 
    
Estimated future payouts under  
Estimated future payouts under
  
All other
stock
awards:
Number
of shares
  
All other
option
awards:
Number
of securities
  
Exercise
or base
price of
option
 
  Grant
non-equity incentive plan awards
  
equitynon-equity incentive plan awards
  of equity incentive plan awardsstock  underlyingoption  awardsExercise
awards:awards:or base 
Name GrantNumberNumberprice of
date Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  or unitsof shares  optionsof securities  ($/Sh)option 
    ($)  ($)  ($)  (#)  (#)  (#)  (#)of stock  underlyingawards
or unitsoptions($/Sh)
(#)
(#)
    
(a) (b) (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j)  (k) 
Leonard Borow 09/13/07-  -   -   -   -   -   -   3.00-%  -   - 
John Buyko09/13/07  -   -   -   -   -   -   2.50-%-  -   - 
John Adamovich, Jr.10/26/07  -   -   -   -   -   -   0.40-%-  -   - 
Charles Badlato10/26/07  -   -   -   -   -   -   0.15%--
Carl Caruso10/26/07-   -   -   - 
-Carl Caruso  - 0.15%--
Harvey R. Blau -  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Certain members of our management have been granted Class B member interests in parent LLC.  Pursuant to the terms of parent LLC’s limited liability operating agreement, the holders of the Class B member interests are entitled to receive a percentage of all distributions, if any, made by parent LLC after the Class A members, including the Sponsors, receive a return of their invested capital and the aforementioned special distribution, where applicable, plus a 12% annual return.  The Class B member interests are intended to provide incentive to management to keep focused on the long-term value of the Company.  These Class B member interests vest over five years.  The number of units disclosed in the table is the percentage share of overall equity interests in the parent LLC represented by these awards.

76

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT JUNE 30, 20082009

                          Equity 
                       Equity  incentive
Equityplan awards: 
        Equity              incentive  Market orplan awards: 
        incentive              plan awards:  payoutMarket or 
        plan awards:           Market  Number of  value ofpayout 
  Number of  Number  Number of        Number of  value of  unearned  unearnedvalue of 
  securities  of securities  securities  Option  Option  shares or  shares or  shares, units  shares,unearned 
Name underlying  underlying  underlying  exercise  expiration  units of  units of  or other  units orshares, 
  unexercised  unexercised  unexercised  Optionprice  date  stock that  stock that  rights that  other rightsunits or 
  options  options  unearned  exercise($)  Option  have not  have not  have not  that haveother rights 
  (#)  (#)  options  price  expiration  vested  vested  vested  not vestedthat have 
Name Exercisable  Unexercisable  (#)  ($)  date  (#)  ($)  (#)  not vested
($)
 
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 
Leonard Borow  -   -   -   -   -   3.002.40%  -   -   - 
John Buyko  -   -   -   -   -   2.502.00%  -   -   - 
John Adamovich, Jr.  -   -   -   -   -   0.400.32%  -   -   - 
Charles Badlato  -   -   -   -   -   0.150.12%  -   -   - 
Carl Caruso  -   -   -   -   -   0.150.12%---
Harvey R.Blau------  -   -   - 

CertainIn fiscal 2008, certain members of our management have beenwere granted Class B member interests in parent LLC.  Pursuant to the terms of parent LLC’s limited liability operating agreement, the holders of the Class B member interests are entitled to receive a percentage of all distributions, if any, made by parent LLC after the Class A members, including the Sponsors, receive a return of their invested capital and the aforementioned special distribution, where applicable, plus a 12% annual return.   These Class B member interests vest over five years.  The number of units disclosed in the table above is the percentage share of overall equity interests in the parent LLC represented by the unvested portion of these awards.awards as of June 30, 2009 (80% of the original award).  The number of units that vested during fiscal 2009 are presented in the table below. These Class B member interests represent profit interests in parent LLC .LLC.  The liquidation value of these interests at June 30, 20082009 was zero.

FISCAL 2008 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED 
             
  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
   Number of Shares  Value Realized  Number of Shares  Value Realized 
Name Acquired on Exercise (#)  on Exercise ($)  Acquired on Vesting (#)  on Exercise ($) 
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e) 
             
Leonard Borow  1,710,450   9,317,229   -   - 
John Buyko  908,334   4,211,943   -   - 
John Adamovich, Jr.  250,000   945,000   5,000   72,500 
Charles Badlato  292,659   1,679,002   -   - 
Carl Caruso  254,919   1,360,917   -   - 
Harvey R. Blau  2,129,653   11,536,690   -   - 

 
7770
 

2008FISCAL 2009 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

Option AwardsStock Awards
Number of SharesValue RealizedNumber of SharesValue Realized
NameAcquired on Exercise (#)on Exercise ($)Acquired on Vesting (#)on Vesting ($)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
Leonard Borow--0.60%-
John Buyko--0.50%-
John Adamovich, Jr.--0.08%-
Charles Badlato--0.03%-
Carl Caruso--0.03%-

2009 PENSION BENEFITS

       Present Value of           Present Value of    
    Number of Years  Accumulated  Payments During     Number of Years  Accumulated  Payments During 
Name Plan Name  Credited Service (#)  Benefit ($)  Last Fiscal Year ($)  Plan Name  Credited Service (#)  Benefit ($)  Last Fiscal Year ($) 
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (b)  (c)  (d)  (e) 
                        
Leonard Borow  (1)  30   -  $-   (1)  30   -  $- 
John Buyko  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
John Adamovich, Jr.  -   -   -  -   -   -   -   - 
Charles Badlato  (1)  20   -  -   (1)  20   -   - 
Carl Caruso  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Harvey R. Blau  (1)  27   -  $9,628,630 

1) Aeroflex Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Effective January 1, 1994, we established the Aeroflex Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for certain of our officers.

The Normal Retirement Age under the SERP is 70.  The SERP would provide an annual benefit of 50% of Final Average Pay. “Final Average Pay” means the average of the three highest paid calendar years out of the last ten prior to retirement.  Benefits are also payable, on a reduced basis, for early retirement after the sum of a participant’s age and years of service equals 70 and the participant attains age 55.  Retirement benefits are payable for life, with a guarantee of 10 years of payments.  In addition, the SERP provides a pre-retirement death benefit payable for 10 years to the participant’s beneficiary and a disability benefit with a guarantee of 10 years of payment; provided that any disability benefit shall be reduced by the amount of the disability benefit payable under the participant’s employment agreement, if any.

The Acquisition constituted a change in control that accelerated the vesting of benefits under our SERP in the event of   a termination of employment of the participants in the SERP on or prior to August 15, 2008. The SERP was amended to provide that no additional benefits are earned after August 31, 2007. The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Borow on August 15, 2007 and amended its employment agreement with Mr. Badlato in July 2008.  The employment agreements provide, among other terms, that if Messrs. Borow and Badlato remain employed beyond August 15, 2008, which they have, certain specified payments, approximating the benefits earned by each of them respectively, under the SERP, plus 6% interest per annum from August 15, 2007, would be payable to them in full satisfaction of the benefits payable under the SERP, payable the earlier of December 31, 2008 to January 5, 2009 or upon specified events. The aggregate liability of the company to Messrs. Borow and Badlato under the SERP, including the related interest, was $14,085,887 and $3,128,276, respectively, at June 30, 2008. These amounts have been reported asin “All Other Compensation” in fiscal 2008 in the summary compensation table.  The aggregate liability to Messrs. Borow and Badlato under the SERP, including the related accrued interest was $19,853,814, which was fully paid in fiscal 2009.

2008
71

2009 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 Executive  Registrant  Aggregate  Aggregate  Aggregate  Executive  Registrant  Aggregate  Aggregate  Aggregate 
 Contributions in  Contributions  Earnings  Withdrawals/  Balance  Contributions in  Contributions  Earnings  Withdrawals/  Balance 
Name Last FY ($)  in Last FY ($)  in Last FY ($)  Distributions ($)  at Last FYE ($)  Last FY ($)  in Last FY ($)  in Last FY ($)  Distributions ($)  at Last FYE ($) 
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f) 
                              
Leonard Borow $-  $-  $(35,173) $2,924,840  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
John Buyko  -   -   -   -  -   -   -   -   -   - 
John Adamovich, Jr.  -   50,000   4,211   -  105,648   -   50,000   5,457   -   161,105 
Charles Badlato  -   -   -  -  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Carl Caruso  -   -   -   -  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Harvey R. Blau $-  $-  $10,574  $4,278,614  $- 

The Company had a Deferred Compensation Plan for Messrs. Borow and Blau that was terminated with the consummation of the Acquisition on August 15, 2007.  This plan required them to defer any salary and bonus in excess of $1 million each year.  These deferrals were deposited in various mutual funds with income or losses being recorded to the liability.  No amounts were deferred for fiscal 2008.  During fiscal 2008, the balance for Messrs. Borow and Blau decreased in value due to changes in market valuations by $35,173 and $28,641, respectively.  The balances were paid in full in August and September of 2007.

78

In 1999, Mr. Blau deferred a portion of his bonus in the form of 118,833 shares of our common stock.  The increase in the value of these shares during fiscal 2008 was $39,215.  These shares were issued to Mr. Blau in connection with the Acquisition.

In accordance with a December 1, 2006 amendment to the employment contract of Mr. Adamovich, we have or will credit to a book reserve $50,000 beginning December 1, 2006 and each successive December 1 that he is employed by us.  This money is notionally invested in bonds, mutual funds or securities as agreed upon by our board of directors and Mr. Adamovich.  For fiscal 20082009 we credited the book reserve by $50,000 and the balance accrued $4,211$5,457 of notional interest.  The Summary Compensation Table reflects the excess of these notional earnings over earnings calculated at a market rate of 120% of the applicable federal long term rate.

2008/2009 ACTUAL PAYMENTS MADE UPON CHANGE IN CONTROL

The Acquisition was considered a change in control event, which resulted in the acceleration or payment of certain benefits.  The vesting of certain restricted stock and stock options was accelerated.  Benefits under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan became fully vested.  Previously earned, but deferred, compensation became payable and certain severance and other payments were made.

In December 2008, Mr. Borow was paid $14,519,690, including interest, in exchange for relinquishing his change in control rights under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that was terminated at the time of the Acquisition.  Further, on January 2, 2008, he received a one-time bonus award in connection with the Acquisition of $886,590 and payments totaling $2,924,840 of previously earned, but deferred, compensation in August and September 2007.  Certain of these payments arewere subject to excise tax and, in accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Borow received a tax gross-up payment of $2,106,326.$2,106,326 in December 2008.

Mr. Buyko had unvested options for which the vesting was accelerated pursuant to the change in control which provided him with a gain of $595,000.

Mr. Adamovich had unvested options and unvested restricted stock for which the vesting was accelerated pursuant to the change in control which provided him with gains of $708,750 and $72,500, respectively.

In January 2009, Mr. Badlato was paid $3,227,798, including interest, in exchange for relinquishing his change in control rights under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that was terminated at the time of the Acquisition.  Further, he had unvested options for which the vesting was accelerated pursuant to the change in control as a result of the Acquisition which provided him with a gain of $39,625.

Mr. Caruso received a one-time bonus award in connection with the Acquisition of $648,450.  Further, he had unvested options for which the vesting was accelerated pursuant to the change in control which provided him with a gain of $39,625.

Mr. Blau received a severance payment of $4,266,839 in connection with the change in control  as a result of the Acquisition and his subsequent retirement in accordance with his employment agreement.  Further, he received payments totaling $4,278,614 of previously earned, but deferred, compensation.  Certain of these payments are subject to excise tax and, in accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Blau received a tax gross-up payment of $2,424,028.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Leonard Borow

Mr. Borow’s employment agreement provides for a three-year consulting period after the termination of employment by expiration of the contract term, mutual agreement or retirement, during which time Mr. Borow will receive consulting payments in an annual amount equal to two-thirds of his last annual base salary. Based on his current salary, he would receive monthly payments of $30,833.

 
7972
 

In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Borow without cause or Mr. Borow terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Borow is entitled to receive his salary, an annual bonus and continuation of health benefits for the remainder of the contract term. For this purpose, the annual bonus will be calculated based on the average of Mr. Borow’s highest annual bonuses for a period not to exceed three years during the fiscal years (for a period not exceeding 10 years) commencing after August 15, 2007. As of June 30, 2008,2009, this lump sum severance would aggregate $5,008,991.$3,795,798.  In the event Mr. Borow’s employment is terminated for cause, Mr. Borow will not be entitled to any severance benefits other than his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award. In the event of Mr. Borow’s death or disability, Mr. Borow or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award, and Mr. Borow or his beneficiary or estate is also entitled to any annual bonus for the current fiscal year based on our performance, prorated to the date of termination. In the event Mr. Borow’s employment terminates due to retirement, Mr. Borow shall be entitled to his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation, a prorated amount of any annual bonus for the fiscal year in which he retired and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award.
 
Mr. Borow is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions until the later of (i) August 15, 2012 and (ii) two years following the later of (a) the termination of his employment for any reason and (b) the three-year consulting period. In addition, we will provide Mr. Borow with a tax gross-up payment to cover any excise tax due under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
John Buyko
 
In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Buyko without cause or Mr. Buyko terminates his employment for good reason, heMr. Buyko is entitled to receive (i) his salary for the remainder of the employment term at the rate in effect immediately prior to such termination, (ii) continuation of health benefits until the earlier of December 31st of the second year following his termination of employment or his commencement of full-time employment with a new employer and (iii) annual bonuses for the remainder of the employment term (including a prorated bonus for any partial fiscal year) equal to the average of the highest annual bonuses for a period not to exceed three years awarded to him during the fiscal years (for a period not exceeding 10 years) commencing after August 15, 2007.  As of June 30, 2008,2009, this lump sum severance would aggregate $4,057,847.$3,075,024.  In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Buyko for cause, he is entitled to receive his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award. In the event of termination upon Mr. Buyko’s death or disability, Mr. Buyko or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive his salary through the date of termination, unused vacation and any benefits that have vested in accordance with the terms of the applicable award, and he is also entitled to any annual bonus for the current fiscal year based on our performance, prorated to the date of termination.
 
In addition, Mr. Buyko is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions until the later of (i) the time period during which Mr. Buyko is entitled to receive severance payments pursuant to the employment agreement and (ii) one year following the termination of his employment for any reason.
 
John Adamovich
 
In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Adamovich within two years following a change in control without cause or Mr. Adamovich terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive (i) a lump sum severance payment, (up to the maximum amount deductible under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code), of 2.5 times the sum of his base salary and average annual bonuses received for our last three fiscal years, (ii) continuation of health benefits until December 31st of the second year following his termination of employment, and (iii) a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination.  As of June 30, 2008,2009, this lump sum severance would aggregate $1,983,333.
 
In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Adamovich without cause, or if Mr. Adamovich terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive (i) his salary and benefits for one year following termination of employment.employment and (ii) any unpaid bonus applicable for the fiscal year in which the date of termination occurs, pro rated to the date of termination, but in no event less than 50% of the bonus he would otherwise be entitled for that fiscal year had he not been terminated.  As of June 30, 2008,2009, this lump sum severance payment would aggregate $440,000.$440,000, excluding any potential bonus.
 
73

Charles Badlato
 
In the event that we terminate the employment of Mr. Badlato without cause, or if Mr. Badlato terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive his salary and benefits for one year following termination of employment.  As of June 30, 2008,2009, this lump sum severance payment would aggregate $250,000. In the event of termination upon death or due to disability, Mr. Badlato or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive 50% of his salary for one year following termination of employment.

80
 
Carl Caruso
 
In the event we terminate the employment of Mr. Caruso without cause, or if Mr. Caruso terminates employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), he is entitled to receive his salary and benefits for one year following termination of employment.  As of June 30, 2008,2009, this lump sum severance would aggregate $290,000.  In the event of termination upon death or due to disability, Mr. Caruso or his beneficiary or estate is entitled to receive 50% of his salary for one year following termination of employment.

Compensation of Directors

Our directors serve without compensation.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent, and an indirect subsidiary of the parent LLC. The parent LLC owns all of the common stock of the parent.
 
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Class A and Class B interests in the parent LLC by:
 
each person who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding equity of the parent LLC;
 
each member of our board of directors, the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC;
 
each of the named executive officers in the “Summary Compensation Table”; and
 
all executive officers and directors as a group.
 
To our knowledge, each of the holders of Class A and Class B interests in the parent LLC listed below has sole voting and investment power as to the interests owned unless otherwise noted.
 
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)
 
Percent of
Class A
Interests(2)
  
Percent of
Class B
Interests(2)
  
Percent of
Class A
Interests(2)
  
Percent of
Class B
Interests(2)
 
Veritas Capital Partners III, L.L.C.(3)(4)  45.1%  —   44.3%  — 
Affiliates of Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc.(5)  26.2%  —   25.8%  — 
GS Direct(6)  22.0%  —   21.7%  — 
Leonard Borow  2.0%  34.4%  1.9%  34.4%
John Buyko  *   28.7%  *   28.7%
John Adamovich, Jr.  *   4.6%  *   4.6%
Charles Badlato  *   1.7%  *   1.7%
Carl Caruso  *   1.7%  *   1.7%
Robert B. McKeon(7)  45.1%  — 
Robert B. McKeon(3)(7)  44.3%  — 
Hugh Evans(3)  —   —   —   — 
Ramzi M. Musallam(3)  —   —   —   — 
Joe Benavides(3)  —   —   —   — 
Prescott H. Ashe(5)  —   —   —   — 
John D. Knoll(5)  —   —   —   — 
Bradley J. Gross(6)  —   —   —   — 
All executive officers and directors as a group (12 persons)(8)  47.4%  71.1%  46.6%  71.1%
*Denotes beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

 
8174
 

(1)Except as otherwise indicated, the address for each of the named beneficial owners is 35 South Service Road, P.O. Box 6022, Plainview, New York 11803.
 
(2)Class A and Class B interests represent approximately 91% and 9% of the parent LLC’s equity interests, respectively.
 
(3)The address for Veritas Capital Partners III, L.L.C. and Messrs. McKeon, Evans, Musallam and Benavides is c/o The Veritas Capital Fund III, L.P., 590 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022. Veritas Capital Partners III, L.L.C. is the general partner of The Veritas Capital Fund III, L.P.
 
(4)Includes Class A interests held by AX Holding LLC, which is an affiliate of Veritas Capital Partners III, L.L.C.
 
(5)The address for Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc., its affiliates and its affiliatesMessrs. Ashe and Knoll is One Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111.
 
(6)The address for GS Direct and Mr. Gross is 85 Broad Street, New York, New York 10004.
 
(7)Mr. McKeon, Chairman of the board of directors of the parent LLC, is the President of Veritas Capital Partners III, L.L.C., and as such may be deemed a beneficial owner of the Class A interests owned by Veritas Capital Partners III, L.L.C. and AX Holding LLC. Mr. McKeon disclaims this beneficial ownership except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in The Veritas Capital Fund III, L.P. and the parent LLC.
 
(8)Includes Class A interests held by Veritas Capital Partners III, L.L.C. and AX Holding LLC, beneficial ownership of which may be deemed to be held by Mr. McKeon, as the President of Veritas Capital Partners III, L.L.C. See footnote 7 above. Mr. McKeon disclaims this beneficial ownership except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in The Veritas Capital Fund III, L.P. and the parent LLC.
 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Advisory Agreement
 
At the closing of the Acquisition, we entered into an advisory agreement with affiliates of the Sponsors under which the Sponsors provide certain advisory services to us. As compensation for these services, we paid the Sponsors a one-time transaction fee as of the closing of the Acquisition in the aggregate amount of $22.0 million and we pay (i) an annual advisory fee in the aggregate amount equal to the greater of $2.2 million and 1.8% of our EBITDA for the prior fiscal year (as defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility) and (ii) transaction fees on all future acquisitions, divestitures, financings and liquidity events, which will be calculated pro rata based upon aggregate equity investments at the time of such future acquisitions, divestitures, financings or liquidity events (taking into account any new investment being made at such time) or, when the Sponsors do not provide any equity investments, based on the value of the transaction. In addition to the fees described above, we also pay or reimburse the Sponsors (i) for all out-of-pocket costs incurred by the Sponsors in connection with their activities under the advisory agreement and (ii) for the reasonable costs and expenses of their respective counsel and advisers in connection with the monitoring of their respective investments in us, any requested amendment or waiver of any investment document, and the sale or disposition of their respective interests in us. The advisory agreement has an initial term expiring on December 31, 2013 and is automatically renewable for additional one year terms thereafter unless we or the Sponsors give notice of non-renewal.  The advisory fees paid to the affiliates of the Sponsors aggregated $2.3 million for fiscal 2009.
 
Limited Liability Company Agreement
 
At the closing of the Acquisition, the Sponsors and certain members of our management who purchased equity interests in the parent LLC became parties to a limited liability company agreement with the parent LLC that sets forth provisions relating to the management and ownership of the parent LLC, including the rights of the Sponsors to appoint members of the parent’s board of directors and the board of managers of the parent LLC. See “Management—Board Composition.” In addition, the limited liability company agreement provides for, among other things, restrictions on the transferability of equity of the parent LLC, tag-along rights, drag-along rights, rights of first refusal, preemptive rights and information rights.
 
75
Without the approval of the Sponsors, subject to certain stated exceptions, the parent LLC may not permit the parent to take certain actions, including:

82
 
a merger, consolidation or liquidation, dissolution or recapitalization (including dividend distributions and reorganizations), public offerings or other liquidity events, until the fifth anniversary of the closing of the Acquisition;
 
acquisitions or divestitures in excess of $25.0 million at any time prior to the expiration of the lock-up period applicable to the Sponsors following an initial public offering of the parent;
 
the grant, issuance or redemption of capital stock or options at any time prior to the expiration of the lock-up period applicable to the Sponsors following an initial public offering of the parent;
 
amendments to the parent’s certificate of incorporation, by-laws, the Senior Secured Credit Facility or the Indenture governing the Notes at any time prior to the expiration of the lock-up period applicable to the Sponsors following an initial public offering of the parent;
 
transactions with the Sponsors or affiliates or employees of the Sponsors;
 
the hiring, termination or modification of compensation arrangements of our Chief Executive Officer or any of his direct reports at any time prior to the expiration of the lock-up period applicable to the Sponsors following an initial public offering of the parent; and
 
the approval of each annual budget (including management bonus programs) and any material deviation from an approved budget at any time prior to the expiration of the lock-up period applicable to the Sponsors following an initial public offering of the parent.
 
Registration Rights Agreement
 
At the closing of the Acquisition, the parent LLC became party to a registration rights agreement with the parent. The registration rights agreement granted the parent LLC customary demand and piggyback registration rights for the benefit of the Sponsors and piggyback registration rights for the benefit of certain members of our management.
 
Issuance of Membership Interests of the Parent LLC
 
In connection with the closing of the Acquisition, the parent LLC issued an aggregate of $372.0 million of membership interests to the Sponsors. Veritas Capital and an affiliate of Veritas Capital purchased $172.0 million of membership interests, affiliates of Golden Gate purchased $100.0 million of membership interests and GS Direct purchased $100.0 million of membership interests. At the closing of the Acquisition, certain members of our management purchased an aggregate of approximately $6.4 million of membership interests from the parent LLC and after the closing, GS Direct transferred $16.0 million of membership interests to third party investors.
 
In addition, certain members of our management have been granted Class B interests in the parent LLC. See “Management—Parent LLC Class B Member Interests.”
 
Transactions with Goldman, Sachs & Co. and its Affiliates
 
Goldman, Sachs & Co. is the manager of GS Direct, L.L.C., a private equity fund which owns approximately 22% of the Class A membership interests of the parent LLC.  Bradley J. Gross, a member of the board of directors of the parent and the board of managers of the parent LLC, is a Managing Director of Goldman, Sachs & Co.’s Principal Investment Area.
 
Under the exchange and registration rights agreement, we agreed to file a market-making prospectus in order to enable Goldman, Sachs & Co. and its affiliates to engage in market-making activities for the Notes. Goldman, Sachs & Co. acted as an Initial Purchaser in the offering of the Notes and received customary fees.  Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., acted as sole lead arranger, sole bookrunner, administrative agent, collateral agent, and syndication agent under each of our senior secured and unsecured credit facilities.  In addition, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. and their affiliates may in the future engage in commercial banking, investment banking or other financial advisory transactions with us and our affiliates.


8376

DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS

Senior Secured Credit Facility
 
On August 15, 2007, we entered into a Senior Secured Credit Facility with various lenders and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as administrative agent. The following is a summary of the material terms that are contained in the Senior Secured Credit Facility. This description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
 
Structure.  The Senior Secured Credit Facility consists of a senior secured term loan, or term loan facility, of $525.0 million, and a senior secured revolving credit facility, or revolving credit facility, of $50.0 million, which facilities may be increased by an incremental facility in an aggregate amount of up to $75.0 million under certain circumstances. A portion of the revolving credit facility is available for letters of credit and swing line loans. The full amount of the term loan facility was drawn to pay a portion of the consideration for the Acquisition and fees and expenses related to the Transactions.  As of June 30, 2009, the outstanding balance due under the term loan facility was $515.8 million and there were no outstanding amounts or letters of credit issued against the revolving credit facility.  Subject to customary conditions, including the absence of defaults under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, amounts available under the revolving credit facility may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed, as applicable until the maturity date thereof. The revolving credit facility is permitted to be used for permitted capital expenditures and permitted acquisitions, to provide for ongoing working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes.
 
Maturity, Amortization and Prepayment.  The term loan facility amortizes in equal consecutive quarterly installments equal to $1,312,500 (which amount will be increased to the extent all or a portion of the incremental facility is drawn), with the balance payable on August 15, 2014. Unless terminated earlier, the revolving credit facility will mature on August 15, 2013.
 
The Senior Secured Credit Facility is subject to mandatory prepayment with: (i) 100% (subject to a reduction to 50% upon achievement of certain financial performance measures) of the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales, subject to certain exceptions and reinvestment rights; (ii) 100% of the net cash proceeds of insurance paid on account of any loss of any property or assets, subject to certain reinvestment rights; (iii) 100% of the net cash proceeds of debt incurrences (other than debt incurrences permitted under the Senior Secured Credit Facility); and (iv) a percentage of our excess cash flow, as defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility, for each year commencing with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 (which percentage ranges from 75% to 0% depending upon the ratio of our consolidated secured indebtedness to our EBITDA). Any such prepayments are required to be applied first to the term loan facility and thereafter to the revolving credit facility (without a corresponding reduction in the revolving credit commitments).
 
Interest.  The loans under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate per annum equal to either: (i) the base rate (as defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility), plus an applicable margin, or (ii) the adjusted LIBOR rate (as defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility), plus an applicable margin, which margins are based on the ratio of our consolidated secured indebtedness to our EBITDA. In the case of loans bearing interest at the adjusted LIBOR rate, the applicable margin ranges from (i) 3.00% to 3.25% in the case of certain term loans, (ii) 3.50% to 3.75% in the case of other term loans and (iii) 2.75% to 3.25% in the case of revolving loans. In the case of loans bearing interest at the base rate, the applicable margins are 1.0% less than those listed in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) above. During the continuance of any payment event of default and, at the election of the required lenders (as defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility) during the continuance of any other event of default, our Senior Secured Credit Facility loans will bear interest at the rate of 2.00% per annum in excess of the per annum rate that would otherwise be in effect.
 
Guarantees and Security.  The Senior Secured Credit Facility, and any obligations under any interest rate hedging agreements entered into between any borrower or guarantor and any counterparty that is (or was at the effective date of such hedging agreement) a lender under the Senior Secured Credit Facility (or any affiliate thereof) are guaranteed by the parent and each of its existing and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, other than us, and certain foreign subsidiaries of the parent that would not be treated as controlled foreign corporations with respect to us for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in each case, subject to certain exceptions for immaterial subsidiaries and subsidiaries prohibited by law from becoming guarantors. Subject to certain customary exceptions, the borrowers and the guarantors granted to the lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and counterparties under the hedging agreements described above a first priority security interest in and lien on substantially all of their assets.
 
77
Fees.  Certain customary fees are payable to the lenders and the agents under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, including, without limitation, a commitment fee based upon non-use of available funds, letter of credit fees, issuer fronting fees and an annual facility servicing fee.

84
 
Covenants.  The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants (subject to materiality thresholds, baskets, and customary exceptions and qualifications), including, but not limited to, restrictions on the ability of the borrowers and guarantors to (i) dispose of assets or stock; (ii) incur additional indebtedness and guarantee obligations; (iii) pay certain dividends; (iv) create liens on assets; (v) make investments, loans or advances; (vi) restrict distributions to the borrowers or guarantors from their subsidiaries; (vii) engage in mergers or consolidations; (viii) engage in certain transactions with affiliates; (ix) incur additional negative pledges; (x) incur capital expenditures; (xi) change our fiscal year or accounting practices or the lines of business in which we and our subsidiaries are involved; (xii) enter into sale-leaseback transactions; (xiii) prepay principal of, premium, or interest on, or redeem, purchase, retire, defease, or create a sinking fund or make a similar payment with respect to, any subordinated indebtedness and certain other debt; (xiv) change the conduct of business; (xv) conduct activities of any parent holding company or (xvi) amend the merger agreement or organizational documents. In addition, under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, we are required to comply with a maximum total leverage ratio test.
 
Events of Default.  The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains customary events of default (subject to mutually agreed exceptions, thresholds and grace periods), including, without limitation: (i) nonpayment of principal or interest; (ii) failure to perform or observe covenants; (iii) inaccuracy or breaches of representations and warranties; (iv) cross-defaults with certain other indebtedness; (v) certain bankruptcy related events; (vi) impairment of security interests in collateral or invalidity or unenforceability of the Senior Secured Credit Facility documents; (vii) monetary judgment defaults; (viii) certain ERISA matters; and (ix) certain change of control events.
 
Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility
 
On September 21, 2007, we entered into a Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility with various lenders and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as administrative agent. The following is a summary of the material terms that are contained in the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility. This description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility.
 
Structure.  The Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility consists of a term loan of $120.0 million, with an outstanding balance of $147.5 million as of June 30, 2009, including paid-in-kind interest of $27.5 million. The full amount of the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility was used to refinance a senior subordinated bridge loan that was drawn to pay a portion of the consideration for the Acquisition and fees and expenses related to the Transactions.
 
Maturity and Prepayment.  The Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility will mature and become due in full on February 15, 2015. The Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility will be subject to mandatory offers to prepay upon the receipt of unapplied asset sale proceeds in excess of $20.0 million and upon a change of control (with a prepayment premium of 1.0%). The Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility may be prepaid at any time, subject to the payment of certain prepayment premiums.
 
Interest.  The loans under the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to 11.75%. Interest is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year and is payable exclusively in kind until August 15, 2010. During the continuance of any payment event of default, the overdue principal and/or interest will bear interest at the rate of 1.00% per annum in excess of the per annum rate that would otherwise be in effect.
 
Guarantees.  The Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility is guaranteed by our existing direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, and will be guaranteed by all of our future domestic restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility).
 
Covenants.  The Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants (subject to materiality thresholds, baskets, and customary exceptions and qualifications), including, but not limited to, restrictions on the ability of the borrowers and guarantors to (i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) create liens on assets; (iii) make restricted payments; (iv) restrict distributions to the borrowers or guarantors from their subsidiaries or incur additional negative pledges; (v) designate unrestricted subsidiaries; (vi) engage in asset sales; (vii) engage in certain transactions with affiliates; (viii) change the lines of business in which we and our subsidiaries are involved; (ix) make payments for consents and (x) engage in mergers or consolidations.
 
78
Events of Default.  The Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility contains customary events of default (subject to certain exceptions, thresholds and grace periods), including, without limitation: (i) nonpayment of principal or interest; (ii) failure to perform or observe covenants; (iii) inaccuracy or breaches of representations and warranties; (iv) cross-acceleration with certain other indebtedness; (v) certain bankruptcy related events; (vi) invalidity or unenforceability of guarantees and (vii) monetary judgment defaults.

85

 
Subordination.  The indebtedness outstanding under the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility is subordinated to the prior payment in full of all senior debt (as defined in the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility).

DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES

General

Aeroflex issued the Notes pursuant to an Indenture (the "Indenture"), dated August 7, 2008, among the Company, the guarantors and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, as trustee (the "Trustee"). The terms of the Notes include those stated in the Indenture and those made part of the Indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the "Trust Indenture Act"). The Notes are subject to all such terms, and Holders of the Notes are referred to the Indenture and the Trust Indenture Act for a statement thereof. The following description is a summary of the material provisions of the Indenture and does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Indenture, including the definitions therein of certain terms used below. We urge you to read the Indenture because that document, and not this description, defines your rights as holders. The definitions of certain terms used in the following summary are set forth below under "—Certain Definitions" and if not defined below under "—Certain Definitions" have the meaning assigned to them in the Indenture. For purposes of this summary, (i) the term "Company" refers only to Aeroflex and not to any of its Subsidiaries and (ii) the terms "we," "our" and "us" refer to the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries.

Brief Description of the Notes

The Notes are:

·general unsecured obligations of the Company;

·effectively subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future secured Indebtedness of the Company, including borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such Indebtedness;

·structurally subordinated to any existing and future Indebtedness and other liabilities of the Company's Foreign Subsidiaries and any future Unrestricted Subsidiaries of the Company;

·pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future senior unsecured Indebtedness of the Company;

·senior in right of payment to all existing and any future subordinated Indebtedness of the Company, including borrowings under the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility; and

·unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by the guarantors.

Note Guarantees

The Notes are guaranteed by all existing Domestic Subsidiaries of the Company and any future Domestic Subsidiaries that are required to become guarantors (the “Guarantors”) under the Indenture as described below under “Certain Covenants – Additional Note Guarantee.” The Guarantors, as primary obligors, jointly and severally and unconditionally guarantee, on a senior unsecured basis, the performance and full and punctual payment when due, whether at maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the Company under the Indenture and the Notes, whether for payment of principal of, or interest on, the Notes, expenses, indemnification or otherwise, on the terms set forth in the Indenture.

Each guarantee of the Notes:
 
is a general unsecured obligation of the Guarantor;
 
79
is effectively subordinated to all existing and future secured Indebtedness of that Guarantor, including guarantees of the obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such Indebtedness;
 
is pari passu in right of payment with all existing and any future senior unsecured Indebtedness of that Guarantor; and

86
 
is senior in right of payment to all existing and any future subordinated Indebtedness of that Guarantor, including guarantees of borrowings under the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility.
 
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, Aeroflex and the Guarantors had total secured Indebtedness of approximately $519.8$515.8 million. As indicated above, payments on the Notes and under the Note Guarantees are effectively subordinated to secured Indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such Indebtedness. The Indenture permits us and the Guarantors to incur additional secured Indebtedness.
 
None of the Company’s Unrestricted Subsidiaries or Foreign Subsidiaries guarantee the Notes. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of these non-guarantor Subsidiaries, the non-guarantor Subsidiaries will pay the holders of their debt and their trade creditors before they will be able to distribute any of their assets to us. As a result, the Notes are structurally subordinated in right of payment to all Indebtedness and other liabilities and commitments (including trade payables and lease obligations) of our non-guarantor Subsidiaries. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, the aggregate total assets (based on book value) of our non-guarantor subsidiaries were $259$241 million, representing approximately 18% of our total assets. In addition, 24%23% of our total liabilities were attributable to our non-guarantor subsidiaries as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009. For fiscal 2008, 30%2009, 29% of our net sales was attributable to our non-guarantor subsidiaries. For fiscal 2008,2009, our non-guarantor subsidiaries had a lossincome from continuing operations of $14.117.8 million.
 
As of the date of the prospectus, all of our Subsidiaries are “Restricted Subsidiaries.”  However, under the circumstances described below under the caption “—Certain Covenants—Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries,” we will be permitted to designate certain of our existing and future Subsidiaries as “Unrestricted Subsidiaries.” Our Unrestricted Subsidiaries are not subject to many of the restrictive covenants in the Indenture. Our Unrestricted Subsidiaries do not guarantee the Notes.
 
The obligations of each Guarantor under its Note Guarantee are limited as necessary to prevent that Note Guarantee from constituting a fraudulent conveyance under applicable law.
 
A Guarantor may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets to, or consolidate with or merge with or into (whether or not such Guarantor is the surviving Person) another Person, other than Aeroflex or another Guarantor, unless:
 
(1)immediately after giving effect to that transaction, no Default or Event of Default exists; and
 
(2)either:
 
 (a)the Person acquiring the property in any such sale or disposition or the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger assumes all the obligations of that Guarantor under the Indenture and its Note Guarantee pursuant to a supplemental Indenture reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee; or
 
 (b)the Net Proceeds of such sale or other disposition are applied in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Indenture including, without limitation, the “Asset Sales” provisions of the Indenture.
 
The Note Guarantee of a Guarantor will be released:
 
(1)in connection with any sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of that Guarantor (including by way of merger or consolidation) to a Person that is not (either before or after giving effect to such transaction) Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex, if the sale or other disposition complies with the “Asset Sale” provisions of the Indenture;
 
(2)in connection with any sale or other disposition of Capital Stock of that Guarantor to a Person that is not (either before or after giving effect to such transaction) Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex if, following such sale or other disposition, the applicable Guarantor is no longer a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex, if the sale or other disposition complies with the applicable provisions of the Indenture, including, without limitation, the “Asset Sales” provisions of the Indenture;
 
80
(3)if Aeroflex designates any Restricted Subsidiary that is a Guarantor to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Indenture;

87
 
(4)upon legal defeasance or satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture as provided below under the captions “—Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance” and “—Satisfaction and Discharge”;
 
(5)if such Guarantor is also a guarantor or borrower under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and, at the time of release of its Note Guarantee, (x) has been or is currently being released from its guarantee of or obligations under, and all pledges and security, if any, granted in connection with the Senior Secured Credit Facility, (y) is not an obligor under any Indebtedness (other than Indebtedness permitted to be incurred pursuant to clauses (6), (7), (8), (10), (11), (13), (15) or (17) of the second paragraph of the covenant described under “—Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock”) and (z) does not guarantee any Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; or
 
(6)in the case of any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex which after the date of the Indenture is required to guarantee the Notes pursuant to the covenant described under “—Certain Covenants—Additional Note Guarantees,” the release or discharge of the guarantee by such Restricted Subsidiary of all of the Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex or the repayment of all of the Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock, in each case, which resulted in the obligation to guarantee the Notes.
 
See “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales,” “—Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries,” “—Legal Defeasances and Covenant Defeasance” and “—Satisfaction and Discharge.”
 
Principal, Maturity and Interest

Aeroflex issued $225.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Original Notes on August 7, 2008, all of which are presently subjectwere exchanged for the Notes pursuant to anthe exchange offering. Aeroflex may issue additional Notes under the Indenture from time to time after the date of the Indenture.  The Notes and any additional notes subsequently issued under the Indenture will be treated as a single class for all purposes under the Indenture, including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase. Aeroflex is issuingissued Notes in denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof. The Notes mature on February 15, 2015.  As previously described, the term “Notes” as used herein, includes both the currently outstanding Original Notes and New Notes issued in exchange for the Original Notes pursuant to the exchange offer.
 
Interest on the Notes accrues at the rate of 11.75% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15.  It is anticipated that an interest payment will be made on the Original Notes on February 15, 2009, and that the New Notes issued in the exchange offer will bear interest from February 16, 2009.  Accordingly, holders of the Original Notes who exchange for New Notes will be paid interest on a continuous basis from August 7, 2008, the date of original issuance.  Interest on overdue principal and interest accrues at a rate that is 1% higher than the then applicable interest rate on the Notes. Aeroflex will make each interest payment to the Holders of record on the February 1 and August 1 immediately preceding the applicable interest payment date.  Interest on the Notes accrues from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest is computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.
 
Methods of Receiving Payments on the Notes
 
If a Holder of Notes gives wire transfer instructions to Aeroflex, Aeroflex will pay all principal, interest and premium on that Holder’s Notes in accordance with those instructions. All other payments on the Notes will be made at the office or agency of the Paying Agent and Registrar within the City and State of New York unless Aeroflex elects to make interest payments by check mailed to the Holders of the Notes at their address set forth in the register of holders.
 
Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes

The Trustee will initially act as Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes. The Company may change the Paying Agent or Registrar without prior notice to the Holders of the Notes, and the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may act as Paying Agent or Registrar.

Transfer and Exchange

A Holder may transfer or exchange Notes in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. The Registrar and the Trustee may require a Holder, among other things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and transfer documents in connection with a transfer of Notes. Holders will be required to pay all taxes or similar government charges due on transfer or exchange. Aeroflex will not be required to transfer or exchange any Note selected for redemption. Also, Aeroflex will not be required to transfer or exchange any Note for a period of 15 days before the mailing of a notice of redemption of Notes to be redeemed.

8881

Optional Redemption
 
At any time prior to August 15, 2010, Aeroflex may on any one or more occasions redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of Notes issued under the Indenture at a redemption price of 111.75% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds of one or more Equity Offerings by Aeroflex or a contribution to Aeroflex’s common equity capital made with the net cash proceeds of one or more Equity Offerings by a direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex; provided that:
 
(1)at least 50% of the aggregate principal amount of Notes originally issued under the Indenture (excluding Notes held by Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries) remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of such redemption; and
 
(2)the redemption occurs within 90 days of the date of the closing of such Equity Offering or equity contribution.
 
At any time prior to August 15, 2011, Aeroflex may also redeem all or a part of the Notes, upon not less than 30 or more than 60 days’ prior notice mailed by first-class mail to each Holder’s registered address, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Notes redeemed plus the Applicable Premium as of, and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption (the “Redemption Date”), subject to the rights of Holders of Notes on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date.
 
Except pursuant to the preceding paragraphs, the Notes will not be redeemable at Aeroflex’s option prior to August 15, 2011. Aeroflex is not prohibited by the terms of the Indenture, however, from acquiring the Notes by means other than a redemption, whether pursuant to an issuer tender offer, in open market transactions or otherwise, assuming such acquisition does not otherwise violate the terms of the Indenture.
 
On or after August 15, 2011, Aeroflex may redeem all or a part of the Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes redeemed, to the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on August 15 of the years indicated below, subject to the rights of Holders of Notes on the relevant record date to receive interest on the relevant interest payment date:
 
Year Percentage 
2011  105.875%
2012  102.938%
2013 and thereafter  100.000%
 
Unless Aeroflex defaults in the payment of the redemption price, interest will cease to accrue on the Notes or portions thereof called for redemption on the applicable redemption date.
 
If less than all of the Notes are to be redeemed, the procedures described below under “—Selection and Notice” will apply.
 
Mandatory Redemption
 
Aeroflex is not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the Notes.
 
82
Repurchase at the Option of Holders
 
Change of Control

If a Change of Control occurs, each Holder of Notes will have the right to require Aeroflex to repurchase all or any part (equal to $2,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof) of that Holder’s Notes pursuant to a Change of Control Offer on the terms set forth in the Indenture. In the Change of Control Offer, Aeroflex will offer a payment in cash (a “Change of Control Payment”) equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes repurchased to the date of purchase, subject to the rights of holders of Notes on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date. Within 30 days following any Change of Control, Aeroflex will mail a notice to each Holder describing the transaction or transactions that constitute the Change of Control and offering to repurchase Notes on the payment date specified in the notice (a “Change of Control Payment Date”), which date will be no earlier than 30 days and no later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed, pursuant to the procedures required by the Indenture and described in such notice. Aeroflex will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent those laws and regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the Notes as a result of a Change of Control. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the Change of Control provisions of the Indenture, Aeroflex will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the Change of Control provisions of the Indenture by virtue of such compliance.
89
 
On the Change of Control Payment Date, Aeroflex will, to the extent lawful:
 
(1)accept for payment all Notes or portions of Notes validly and properly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the Change of Control Offer;
 
(2)deposit with the Paying Agent an amount equal to the Change of Control Payment in respect of all Notes or portions of Notes validly and properly tendered and not withdrawn; and
 
(3)deliver or cause to be delivered to the Trustee the Notes properly accepted together with an Officers’ Certificate stating the aggregate principal amount of Notes or portions of Notes being purchased by Aeroflex.
 
The Paying Agent will promptly mail (but in any case not later than 5 days after the Change of Control Payment Date) to each Holder of Notes validly and properly tendered and not withdrawn the Change of Control Payment for such Notes, and the Trustee will promptly authenticate and mail (or cause to be transferred by book entry) to each holder a new Note equal in principal amount to any unpurchased portion of the Notes surrendered, if any; provided that each new Note will be in denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof. Aeroflex will publicly announce the results of the Change of Control Offer on or as soon as practicable after the Change of Control Payment Date. A Change of Control Offer may be made in advance of a Change of Control, conditional upon such Change of Control, if a definitive agreement is in place for the Change of Control at the time of making of the Change of Control Offer. Notes repurchased pursuant to a Change of Control Offer will be retired and cancelled.
 
The provisions described above that require Aeroflex to make a Change of Control Offer following a Change of Control will be applicable whether or not any other provisions of the Indenture are applicable. Except as described above with respect to a Change of Control, the Holders of the Notes may not require that Aeroflex repurchase or redeem the Notes in the event of a takeover, recapitalization, spin-off or similar transaction.
 
Aeroflex will not be required to make a Change of Control Offer upon a Change of Control if (1) a third party makes the Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth in the Indenture applicable to a Change of Control Offer made by Aeroflex and purchases all Notes validly and properly tendered and not withdrawn under the Change of Control Offer, (2) notice of redemption has been given pursuant to the Indenture as described above under the caption “—Optional Redemption,” unless and until there is a default in payment of the applicable redemption price, or (3) in connection with or in contemplation of any Change of Control, they or a third party has made an offer to purchase (an “Alternate Offer”) any and all Notes validly and properly tendered at a cash price equal to or higher than the Change of Control Payment and has purchased all Notes validly and properly tendered and not withdrawn in accordance with the terms of such Alternate Offer.
 
The definition of Change of Control includes a phrase relating to the direct or indirect sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of “all or substantially all” of the properties or assets of Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole. Although there is a limited body of case law interpreting the phrase “substantially all,” there is no precise established definition of the phrase under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a Holder of Notes to require Aeroflex to repurchase its Notes as a result of a sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of less than all of the assets of Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole to another Person or group may be uncertain.
 
Asset Sales
Asset Sales
 
Aeroflex will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, consummate an Asset Sale unless:
 
(1)Aeroflex (or the Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be) receives consideration at the time of the Asset Sale at least equal to the Fair Market Value of the assets or Equity Interests issued or sold or otherwise disposed of; and

9083
 
(2)at least 75% of the consideration received in the Asset Sale by Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary is in the form of cash, Cash Equivalents or a combination thereof. For purposes of this provision (but not the definition of Net Proceeds), each of the following will be deemed to be cash:
 
 (a)any liabilities, as shown on Aeroflex’s most recent consolidated balance sheet, of Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary (other than contingent liabilities and liabilities that are by their terms subordinated to the Notes or any Note Guarantee) that are assumed by the transferee of any such assets pursuant to a customary assumption agreement that releases Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary from further liability;
 
 (b)any securities, notes or other obligations received by Aeroflex or any such Restricted Subsidiary from such transferee that are, within 180 days following receipt thereof, converted (including by way of a financing transaction) by Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary into cash, to the extent of the cash received in that conversion;
 
 (c)any stock or assets of the kind referred to in clauses (3) or (5) of the next paragraph;
 
 (d)any Designated Noncash Consideration received by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary thereof in such Asset Sale having a Fair Market Value, taken together with all other Designated Noncash Consideration received pursuant to this clause (d) that is at that time outstanding, not to exceed the greater of (i) $50.0 million and (ii) 5.0% of Total Assets at the time of receipt of such Designated Noncash Consideration, with the Fair Market Value of each item of Designated Noncash Consideration being measured at the time received without giving effect to subsequent changes in value; and
 
 (e)cash held in escrow as security for any purchase price settlement, for damages in respect of a breach of representations and warranties or certain covenants or for payment of other contingent obligations in connection with the Asset Sale.
 
Within 450 days after the receipt of any Net Proceeds from an Asset Sale (provided that with respect to clauses (3) and (5) of this paragraph, a binding commitment entered into within such 450 day period shall be treated as a permitted application of the Net Proceeds from the date of such commitment so long as such Net Proceeds are applied to satisfy such commitment within 180 days of such commitment; provided further that if any such commitment is cancelled or terminated for any reason before such Net Proceeds are applied, then such Net Proceeds shall constitute Excess Proceeds), Aeroflex (or the applicable Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be) may apply such Net Proceeds, at its option:
 
(1)
to repay Senior Debt and, if the Senior Debt repaid is revolving credit Indebtedness, to correspondingly reduce commitments with respect thereto; provided that if such Senior Debt is not secured by a Lien, Aeroflex (or the applicable Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be) will, equally and ratably, reduce Obligations under the Notes by, at its option, (A) redeeming Notes, (B) making an offer (in accordance with the procedures set forth below for an Asset Sale Offer) to all Holders to purchase their Notes at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus the amount of accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of Notes to be repurchased or (C) purchasing Notes through open market purchases (to the extent such purchases are at a price equal to or higher than 100% of the principal amount thereof) in a manner that complies with applicable securities law;
 
(2)to repay any Indebtedness of any Restricted Subsidiary that is not a Guarantor (other than any Indebtedness owed to Aeroflex or another Restricted Subsidiary);
 
(3)to acquire all or substantially all of the assets of, or any Capital Stock of any Person engaged in, another Permitted Business, if, after giving effect to any such acquisition of Capital Stock, the Permitted Business is or becomes a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex;
 
(4)to make a capital expenditure that is used or useful in a Permitted Business;
 
(5)to acquire other assets that are not classified as current assets under GAAP and that are used or useful in a Permitted Business; or
 
(6)
to make an Asset Sale Offer by designating such Net Proceeds as “Excess Proceeds” or, to the extent a Change of Control has occurred as a result of such Asset Sale, to make a Change of Control Offer.

9184
 
Pending the final application of any Net Proceeds, Aeroflex may temporarily reduce revolving credit borrowings or otherwise invest the Net Proceeds in any manner that is not prohibited by the Indenture.
 
Any Net Proceeds from Asset Sales that are not applied or invested as provided in the second paragraph of this covenant will constitute “Excess Proceeds.” When the aggregate amount of Excess Proceeds exceeds $20.0 million, within 10 days thereof, Aeroflex will make an Asset Sale Offer to all holders of Notes and all holders of other Indebtedness that is pari passu with the Notes containing provisions similar to those set forth in the Indenture with respect to offers to purchase or redeem with the proceeds of sales of assets to purchase the maximum principal amount of Notes and such other pari passu Indebtedness that may be purchased out of the Excess Proceeds. The offer price in any Asset Sale Offer will be equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase, and will be payable in cash. If any Excess Proceeds remain after consummation of an Asset Sale Offer, Aeroflex may use those Excess Proceeds for any purpose not otherwise prohibited by the Indenture. If the aggregate principal amount of Notes and other pari passu Indebtedness properly and validly tendered into such Asset Sale Offer exceeds the amount of Excess Proceeds, the Trustee will select the Notes and Aeroflex or such other applicable party shall select such other pari passu Indebtedness to be purchased on a pro rata basis. Upon completion of each Asset Sale Offer, the amount of Excess Proceeds will be reset at zero.
 
Aeroflex will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent those laws and regulations are applicable in connection with each repurchase of Notes pursuant to an Asset Sale Offer. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the Asset Sales provisions of the Indenture, Aeroflex will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the Asset Sales provisions of the Indenture by virtue of such compliance.
 
The Senior Secured Credit Facility prohibits Aeroflex from purchasing any Notes, and also provides that certain Change of Control or Asset Sale events with respect to Aeroflex would constitute a default under that agreement. Any future credit agreements or other agreements relating to Indebtedness to which Aeroflex becomes a party may contain similar restrictions and provisions. In the event a Change of Control or Asset Sale occurs at a time when Aeroflex is prohibited from purchasing Notes, Aeroflex could seek the consent of its lenders to the purchase of Notes or could attempt to refinance the borrowings that contain such prohibition. If Aeroflex does not obtain such a consent or repay such borrowings, Aeroflex will remain prohibited from purchasing Notes. In such case, Aeroflex’s failure to purchase tendered Notes would constitute an Event of Default under the Indenture which would, in turn, constitute a default under the agreements governing such Indebtedness. Finally, Aeroflex’s ability to pay cash to the Holders of Notes upon a repurchase required as a result of a Change of Control may be limited by Aeroflex’s then existing financial resources. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Notes and Our Indebtedness—We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to finance the Change of Control Offer required by the Indenture governing the Notes.”
 
Selection and Notice
 
If less than all of the Notes are to be redeemed at any time, the Trustee will select Notes for redemption on a pro rata basis, unless otherwise required by law or applicable stock exchange requirements.
 
Notes and portions of Notes selected for purchase or redemption will be in amounts of $2,000 or whole multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof. No Notes of $2,000 or less can be redeemed in part except that if all the Notes of a Holder are to be redeemed or purchased, the entire outstanding amount of Notes held by such Holder, even if not equal to $2,000 or a multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof, will be redeemed or purchased. Notices of purchase or redemption will be mailed by first class mail at least 30 but not more than 60 days before the redemption date to each Holder of Notes to be purchased or redeemed at its registered address, except that redemption notices may be mailed more than 60 days prior to a redemption date if the notice is issued in connection with a defeasance of the Notes or a satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Indenture. Failure to give notice of redemption, or any defect in such notice to any Holder selected for redemption will not impair or affect the validity of the redemption of any other Note redeemed in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. Notices of redemption may not be conditional.
 
If any Note is to be purchased or redeemed in part only, the notice of purchase or redemption that relates to that Note will state the portion of the principal amount of that Note that is to be purchased or redeemed. A new Note in principal amount equal to the unpurchased or unredeemed portion of the original Note will be issued in the name of the Holder of Notes upon cancellation of the original Note. Notes called for purchase or redemption must be surrendered to the Paying Agent to collect the purchase or redemption price and become due on the date fixed for purchase or redemption. On and after the purchase or redemption date, interest ceases to accrue on Notes or portions of Notes called for purchase or redemption.

9285
 
Certain Covenants
 
Restricted Payments
Restricted Payments
 
Aeroflex will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly:
 
(1)declare or pay any dividend or make any other payment or distribution on account of Aeroflex’s or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries’ Equity Interests (including, without limitation, any payment in connection with any merger or consolidation involving Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries) or to the direct or indirect holders of Aeroflex’s or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries’ Equity Interests in their capacity as such (other than dividends or distributions payable in Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock) of Aeroflex and other than dividends or distributions payable to Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex);
 
(2)purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire or retire for value (including, without limitation, in connection with any merger or consolidation involving Aeroflex) any Equity Interests of Aeroflex or any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex (other than in exchange for Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock) of Aeroflex or any direct or indirect parent company of Aeroflex);
 
(3)make any payment on or with respect to, or purchase, redeem, defease or otherwise acquire or retire for value any Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any Guarantor that is contractually subordinated to the Notes or to any Note Guarantee (excluding any intercompany Indebtedness between or among Aeroflex and any of its Restricted Subsidiaries), except (i) payments of interest and principal at the Stated Maturity thereof and (ii) the purchase, repurchase or other acquisition of any such Indebtedness in anticipation of satisfying a sinking fund obligation, principal installment or final maturity, in each case, due within one year of the date of such purchase, repurchase or other acquisition; or
 
(4)make any Restricted Investment
 
(all such payments and other actions set forth in these clauses (1) through (4) above being collectively referred to as “Restricted Payments”),
 
unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such Restricted Payment:
 
(1)no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence of such Restricted Payment;
 
(2)Aeroflex would, at the time of such Restricted Payment and after giving pro forma effect thereto as if such Restricted Payment had been made at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter period, have been permitted to incur at least $1.00 of additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the covenant described below under the caption “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock;” and
 
(3)such Restricted Payment, together with the aggregate amount of all other Restricted Payments made by Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries since August 15, 2007 (excluding Restricted Payments permitted by clauses (2) through (12) and (14) through (18) of the next succeeding paragraph), is less than the sum, without duplication, of:
 
 (a)
50% of the Consolidated Net Income of Aeroflex for the period (taken as one accounting period) from July 1, 2007 to the end of Aeroflex’s most recently ended fiscal quarter for which internal financial statements are available at the time of such Restricted Payment (or, if such Consolidated Net Income for such period is a deficit, less 100% of such deficit); plus
 
 (b)
100% of the aggregate Qualified Proceeds received by Aeroflex since August 15, 2007 as a contribution to its equity capital or from the issue or sale of Equity Interests of Aeroflex (other than Disqualified Stock) or from the issue or sale of convertible or exchangeable Disqualified Stock or convertible or exchangeable debt securities of Aeroflex that have been converted into or exchanged for such Equity Interests (other than Equity Interests (or Disqualified Stock or debt securities) sold to a Subsidiary of Aeroflex), together with the aggregate cash and Cash Equivalents received by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries at the time of such conversion or exchange; plus

9386
 
 (c)
to the extent that any Restricted Investment made after August 15, 2007 is sold, is otherwise disposed of or is repurchased, redeemed, liquidated or repaid, 100% of the cash and the Fair Market Value of other property so received with respect to such Restricted Investment (less the cost of disposition, if any); plus
 
 (d)
to the extent that any Unrestricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex designated as such after the date of the Indenture is redesignated as a Restricted Subsidiary after the date of the Indenture, the Fair Market Value of Aeroflex’s Investment in such Subsidiary as of the date of such redesignation; plus
 
 (e)100% of any dividends (or other distributions) received by Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex after the date of the Indenture from an Unrestricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex, to the extent that such dividends were not otherwise included in the Consolidated Net Income of Aeroflex for such period.
 
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, the amount available for Restricted Payments pursuant to the foregoing clause (3) is approximately $21.3$32.1 million.
 
The preceding provisions will not prohibit:
 
(1)the payment of any dividend (or other distribution) or the consummation of any irrevocable redemption within 60 days after the date of declaration of the dividend (or other distribution) or giving of the redemption notice, as the case may be, if at the date of declaration or notice, the dividend (or other distribution) or redemption payment would have complied with the provisions of the Indenture;
 
(2)the making of any Restricted Payment in exchange for, or out of the net cash proceeds of the substantially concurrent sale (other than to a Subsidiary of Aeroflex) of, Equity Interests of Aeroflex (other than Disqualified Stock) or from the substantially concurrent contribution of common equity capital to Aeroflex;
 
(3)the purchase, repurchase, redemption, defeasance or other acquisition or retirement for value of Indebtedness or any Disqualified Stock of Aeroflex or any Guarantor that is contractually subordinated to the Notes or to any Note Guarantee with the net cash proceeds from a substantially concurrent incurrence of (i) Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness or (ii) other Indebtedness which is incurred in compliance with the covenant described below under “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock” so long as such new Indebtedness is subordinated in right of payment to the Notes on terms that, taken as a whole, are not materially less favorable to the Holders of Notes than those contained in the documentation governing the Indebtedness being purchased, repurchased, redeemed, defeased or acquired or retired for value;
 
(4)
the declaration or payment of any dividend (or other distribution) by a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex to the holders of its Equity Interests on a pro rata basis;
 
(5)
the repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement for value of any Equity Interests of Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex and any distribution, dividend, loan or advance to parent or any direct or indirect parent of parent for the repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement for value of any Equity Interests of parent or any direct or indirect parent of parent, in each case, held by any current or former officer, director, consultant or employee of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or, in each case to the extent applicable, their respective estates, spouses, former spouses or family members or other permitted transferees, in each case, pursuant to any equity subscription agreement, stock option agreement, shareholders’ agreement or other agreement, benefit plan or arrangement of any kind; provided that the aggregate price paid for all such repurchased, redeemed, acquired or retired Equity Interests may not exceed $5.0 million in any calendar year period; provided further that Aeroflex may carry over and make in subsequent calendar year periods, in addition to the amounts permitted for such calendar year period, the amount of such repurchases, redemptions or other acquisitions or retirements for value, distributions, loans or advances permitted to have been made but not made in any preceding calendar year period up to a maximum of $10.0 million in any calendar year period; provided further that such amount in any calendar year may be increased by an amount not to exceed (i) the net cash proceeds from the sale of Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock) of Aeroflex (or any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex to the extent such net cash proceeds are contributed to the common equity of Aeroflex) to employees, officers, directors or consultants (or any permitted transferees thereof) of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries (or any direct or indirect parent company thereof), that occurs after the date of the Indenture plus (ii) the cash proceeds of key man life insurance policies received by Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries after the date of the Indenture less any amounts previously applied to the payment of Restricted Payments pursuant to this clause (5); provided further that cancellation of Indebtedness owing to Aeroflex from employees, officers, directors and consultants (or any permitted transferees thereof) of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (or any direct or indirect parent company thereof), in connection with a repurchase of Equity Interests of Aeroflex from such Persons will not be deemed to constitute a Restricted Payment for purposes of this covenant or any other provisions of the Indenture;

9487
 
(6)the repurchase of Equity Interests deemed to occur upon the exercise of options, warrants or other convertible securities to the extent such Equity Interests represent a portion of the exercise price of those options, warrants or other convertible securities;
 
(7)as long as no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing or would be caused thereby, the declaration and payment of dividends and distributions to holders of any class or series of Disqualified Stock of Aeroflex or preferred stock of any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex issued on or after the date of the Indenture in accordance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio test described below under the caption “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock;”
 
(8)payments made after August 15, 2007 in connection with, or as a result of, the Transactions and any payment solely to reimburse the Principals or their Affiliates for actual out-of-pocket expenses, not including fees paid directly or indirectly to Principals or their Affiliates, in connection with the Transactions or for the provision of third party services to Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries;
 
(9)Permitted Payments to Parent, including those payments permitted to be made pursuant to clause (7) of the covenant described below under the caption “—Transactions with Affiliates;”
 
(10)
upon the occurrence of a Change of Control and within 60 days after completion of the offer to repurchase Notes pursuant to the covenant described above under the caption “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control” (including the purchase of all Notes tendered), any purchase or redemption of Indebtedness of Aeroflex that is contractually subordinated to the Notes (including, without limitation, Indebtedness under the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility) or any Guarantee that is required to be repurchased or redeemed pursuant to the terms thereof as a result of such Change of Control, at a purchase price not greater than 101% of the outstanding principal amount thereof (plus accrued and unpaid interest); provided that, prior to such repayment or repurchase, Aeroflex shall have made the Change of Control Offer with respect to the Notes as required by the Indenture, and Aeroflex shall have repurchased all Notes validly tendered for payment and not withdrawn in connection with such Change of Control Offer;
 
(11)
within 60 days after the completion of an Asset Sale Offer pursuant to the covenant described under the caption “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales” (including the purchase of all Notes tendered), any purchase or redemption of Indebtedness of Aeroflex that is contractually subordinated to the Notes or any Guarantee that is required to be repurchased or redeemed pursuant to the terms thereof as a result of such Asset Sale, at a purchase price not greater than 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof (plus accrued and unpaid interest) with any Excess Proceeds that remain after consummation of an Asset Sale Offer; provided that, prior to such repayment or repurchase, Aeroflex shall have made the Asset Sale Offer with respect to the Notes as required by the Indenture, and Aeroflex shall have repurchased all Notes validly tendered for payment and not withdrawn in connection with such Asset Sale Offer;
 
(12)
the redemption, repurchase or other acquisition for value of any common Equity Interests of any Foreign Subsidiary of Aeroflex that are held by a Person that is not an Affiliate of Aeroflex to the extent required to satisfy applicable laws, rules or regulations in an aggregate amount since August 15, 2007 not to exceed $5.0 million; provided that the consideration for such redemption, repurchase or other acquisition is not in excess of an amount equal to the lesser of (x) the Fair Market Value of such common Equity Interests or (y) such amount required by applicable laws, rules or regulations;
 
(13)
as long as no Default has occurred and is continuing or would be caused thereby, the declaration or payments of dividends on the common Capital Stock of Aeroflex (or the payment of dividends to any direct or indirect parent company of Aeroflex) following a public equity offering of the common stock of Aeroflex or the common Capital Stock of a direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex of up to 6.0% per annum of the net cash proceeds received by or contributed to Aeroflex in or as a result of such public equity offering (other than any net cash proceeds that constitute an Excluded Contribution);
 
(14)
as long as no Default has occurred and is continuing or would be caused thereby, payments to enable Aeroflex to make payments to holders of its Capital Stock in lieu of issuance of fractional shares of its Capital Stock; provided, however, that any such cash payment shall not be for the purpose of evading the limitation of the covenant described under this subheading (as determined in the good faith by the Board of Directors of Aeroflex);

9588
 
(15)the payment of intercompany Indebtedness that is expressly subordinated to the Notes or any Guarantee, the incurrence of which is permitted under clause (6) of the second paragraph of the covenant described under the caption “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock;”
 
(16)the purchase, redemption, acquisition, cancellation or other retirement for value of Equity Interests of Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary to the extent necessary, in good faith judgment of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex, to prevent the loss or secure the renewal or reinstatement of any license, permit or eligibility held by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries under any applicable law or governmental regulation or the policies of any governmental authority or other regulatory body in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5.0 million since August 15, 2007;
 
(17)Restricted Payments that are made with Excluded Contributions;
 
(18)distributions or payments of securitization fees and purchases of Securitization Assets in connection with Qualified Receivables Transactions; and
 
(19)as long as no Default has occurred and is continuing or would be caused thereby, other Restricted Payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $20.0 million since August 15, 2007.
 
The amount of all Restricted Payments (other than cash) will be the Fair Market Value on the date of the Restricted Payment of the asset(s) or securities proposed to be transferred or issued by Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, pursuant to the Restricted Payment. The Fair Market Value of any assets or securities that are required to be valued by this covenant will be determined by the Board of Directors of Aeroflex whose resolution with respect thereto will be delivered to the Trustee. The determination of Aeroflex’s Board of Directors must be based upon an opinion or appraisal issued by an accounting, appraisal or investment banking firm of national standing if the Fair Market Value exceeds $25.0 million.
 
Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary, any net cash proceeds, marketable securities or Qualified Proceeds utilized for any Restricted Payment pursuant to clause (3)(b) of the first paragraph of this covenant or clauses (2), (5) or (17) of the third paragraph of this covenant, or that are utilized for the incurrence of Indebtedness pursuant to clause (19) of the covenant described below under the caption “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock”, shall not be utilized for any Restricted Payment or incurrence of Indebtedness under the other provisions referred to in this sentence.
 
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock
 
Aeroflex will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create, incur, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise become directly or indirectly liable, contingently or otherwise, with respect to (collectively, “incur”) any Indebtedness (including Acquired Debt), and Aeroflex will not issue any Disqualified Stock and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to issue any shares of preferred stock; provided, however, that Aeroflex may incur Indebtedness (including Acquired Debt) or issue Disqualified Stock and the Guarantors may incur Indebtedness (including Acquired Debt) or issue preferred stock, if the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for Aeroflex’s most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available immediately preceding the date on which such additional Indebtedness is incurred or such Disqualified Stock or such preferred stock is issued, as the case may be, would have been at least 2.0 to 1.0, determined on a pro forma basis (including a pro forma application of the net proceeds therefrom), as if the additional Indebtedness had been incurred or the Disqualified Stock or the preferred stock had been issued, as the case may be, at the beginning of such four-quarter period.
 
The first paragraph of this covenant will not prohibit the incurrence of any of the following items of Indebtedness (collectively, “Permitted Debt”):
 
89
(1)
(a) the incurrence by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Indebtedness and letters of credit under Credit Facilities, which excludes the Notes issued on the date of and pursuant to the Indenture, in an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding under this clause (1) (with letters of credit being deemed to have a principal amount equal to the maximum potential liability of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries thereunder) not to exceed $650.0 million less the aggregate principal amount of all Indebtedness incurred under clause (b) of this paragraph plus the amount of any fees, underwriting discounts, premiums, prepayment penalties and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with extending, refinancing, renewing, replacing or refunding any Credit Facility under which Indebtedness is incurred pursuant to this clause (a), and (b) Indebtedness incurred by a Receivables Entity in a Qualified Receivables Transaction that is not recourse to Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (except for Standard Securitization Undertakings); provided, however, that after giving effect to any such incurrence, the aggregate amount of all indebtedness incurred under this clause (b) and then outstanding does not exceed $650.0 million less the aggregate principal amount of all Indebtedness incurred under clause (a) of this paragraph;

96
 
(2)the incurrence by Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries of the Existing Indebtedness;
 
(3)the incurrence by Aeroflex and the Guarantors of Indebtedness represented by the Notes and the related Note Guarantees issued on the date of the Indenture and the Notes and the related Note Guarantees to be issued pursuant to the exchange offer;
 
(4)the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Indebtedness represented by Capital Lease Obligations, mortgage financings or purchase money obligations, in each case, incurred for the purpose of financing all or any part of the purchase price or cost of design, development, construction, installation or improvement of real or personal property, plant or equipment used in the business of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (whether through the direct acquisition or otherwise of such assets or the acquisition of Equity Interests of any Person owning such assets), in an aggregate principal amount for all Indebtedness, including all Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred to renew, refund, refinance, replace, defease or discharge any Indebtedness incurred pursuant to this clause (4), not to exceed the greater of $30.0 million and 2.0% of Total Assets at any time outstanding;
 
(5)the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness in exchange for, or the net proceeds of which are used to renew, refund, refinance, replace, defease or discharge any Indebtedness (other than intercompany Indebtedness) that was permitted by the Indenture to be incurred under the first paragraph of this covenant or clauses (2) through (5), (14), (15) or (17) through (22) of this paragraph;
 
(6)
the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of intercompany Indebtedness between or among Aeroflex and any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; provided, however, that:
 
 (a)if Aeroflex or any Guarantor is the obligor on such Indebtedness and the payee is not Aeroflex or a Guarantor, such Indebtedness must be expressly subordinated to the prior payment in full in cash of all Obligations then due with respect to the Notes, in the case of Aeroflex, or the Note Guarantee, in the case of a Guarantor; and
 
 (b)(i) any subsequent issuance or transfer of Equity Interests that results in any such Indebtedness being held by a Person other than Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary and (ii) any sale or other transfer of any such Indebtedness (other than solely as a result of the creation of a Permitted Lien upon such intercompany Indebtedness) to a Person that is not either Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary will be deemed, in each case, to constitute an incurrence of such Indebtedness by Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, that was not permitted by this clause (6);
 
(7)
the issuance by any of Aeroflex’s Restricted Subsidiaries to Aeroflex or to any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of shares of preferred stock; provided, however, that:
 
 (a)any subsequent issuance or transfer of Equity Interests that results in any such preferred stock being held by a Person other than Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary; and
 
 (b)any sale or other transfer of any such preferred stock (other than solely as a result of the creation of a Permitted Lien upon such Equity Interests) to a Person that is not either Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary,
 
will be deemed, in each case, to constitute an issuance of such preferred stock by such Restricted Subsidiary that was not permitted by this clause (7);
 
(8)the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Hedging Obligations in the ordinary course of business;
 
90
(9)
(i) the guarantee by Aeroflex or any of the Guarantors of Indebtedness of Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex that was permitted to be incurred by another provision of this covenant; and (ii) the guarantee by a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex of Indebtedness of Aeroflex or another Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex incurred in accordance with the terms of the Indenture; provided, in each case, that if the Indebtedness being guaranteed is subordinated to or pari passu with the Notes or any Note Guarantee, then the Guarantee shall be subordinated or pari passu, as applicable, to the same extent as the Indebtedness guaranteed;

97
 
(10)the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Indebtedness in respect of insurance financing arrangements, take or pay obligations contained in supply agreements, and obligations in respect of, workers’ compensation claims, self-insurance obligations, bankers’ acceptances, performance, completion and surety bonds, appeal bonds, completion guarantees and similar obligations, payment obligations in connection with self insurance or similar requirements (including Indebtedness represented by letters of credit for the account of Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, opened to provide security for any of the foregoing) in the ordinary course of business;
 
(11)the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Indebtedness arising from the honoring by a bank or other financial institution of a check, draft or similar instrument inadvertently drawn against insufficient funds, so long as such Indebtedness is covered within five business days and obligations in connection with netting services;
 
(12)
the incurrence by Aeroflex or of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Indebtedness arising from agreements of Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary providing for indemnification, adjustment of purchase price or similar obligations, in each case, incurred or assumed in connection with the sale or other disposition of any business, assets or Capital Stock of Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary, other than guarantees of Indebtedness incurred by any Person acquiring all or any portion of such business, assets or Capital Stock; provided that the maximum aggregate liability in respect of all such Indebtedness shall at no time exceed the gross proceeds, whether or not cash, actually received by Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with such disposition;
 
(13)the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of contingent liabilities arising out of endorsements of checks and other negotiable instruments for deposit or collection in the ordinary course of business;
 
(14)the incurrence by a Foreign Subsidiary of additional Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount, including all Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred to renew, refund, refinance, replace, defease or discharge any Indebtedness incurred pursuant to this clause (14), not to exceed $20.0 million at any time outstanding;
 
(15)
the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Indebtedness constituting reimbursement obligations with respect to letters of credit issued in the ordinary course of business, including, without limitation, letters of credit in respect of workers’ compensation claims or self-insurance, or other Indebtedness with respect to reimbursement type obligations regarding workers’ compensation claims or self-insurance; provided, however, that, upon the drawing of such instruments or the incurrence of such Indebtedness, such obligations are reimbursed within 30 days following such drawing or incurrence;
 
(16)Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to the extent the proceeds thereof are promptly used to redeem the Notes in full or deposited to defease or discharge the Notes, in each case, in accordance with the Indenture;
 
(17)Indebtedness consisting of Permitted Investments of the kind described in clauses (7) and (8) of the definition thereof;
 
(18)
Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock of a Person incurred and outstanding on or prior to the date on which such Person was acquired by, Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary or merged into Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary in accordance with the terms of the Indenture; provided that such Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock is not incurred in connection with or in contemplation of, or to provide all or any portion of the funds or credit support utilized to consummate, such acquisition or merger; and provided, further that, after giving effect to such incurrence of Indebtedness or issuance of Disqualified Stock, the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for Aeroflex’s most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available immediately preceding the date on which such additional Indebtedness is incurred or such Disqualified Stock is issued, as the case may be, determined on a pro forma basis (including a pro forma application of the net proceeds therefrom), as if the additional Indebtedness had been incurred or the Disqualified Stock had been issued, as the case may be, at the beginning of such four-quarter period, would not be less than such Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio immediately prior to such incurrence or issuance;
 
91
(19)the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Indebtedness in connection with the acquisition of all of the Capital Stock of a Person that becomes a Restricted Subsidiary or all or substantially all of the assets of a Person, in each case, engaged in a Permitted Business having an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding, including all Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred to renew, refund, refinance, replace, defease or discharge any Indebtedness incurred pursuant to this clause (19), not to exceed an amount equal to 100% of the net cash proceeds received by Aeroflex from the issuance or sale (other than to a Subsidiary of Aeroflex) of its Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) or as a contribution to the equity capital of Aeroflex (other than as Disqualified Stock), in each case subsequent to August 15, 2007;

98
 
(20)Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries supported by a letter of credit issued pursuant to a Credit Facility in a principal amount not in excess of the stated amount of such letter of credit;
 
(21)to the extent constituting Indebtedness, First Priority Cash Management Obligations; and
 
(22)the incurrence by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of additional Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount (or accreted value, as applicable) at any time outstanding, including all Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred to renew, refund, refinance, replace, defease or discharge any Indebtedness incurred pursuant to this clause (22), not to exceed $75.0 million.
 
For purposes of determining compliance with this “Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock” covenant, in the event that an item of Indebtedness or proposed Indebtedness (or any portion thereof) meets the criteria of more than one of the categories of Permitted Debt described in clauses (1) through (22) above, or is entitled to be incurred pursuant to the first paragraph of this covenant, Aeroflex (in its sole discretion) will be permitted to divide and classify such item of Indebtedness (or any portion thereof) on the date of its incurrence, and later, from time to time, reclassify all or a portion of such item of Indebtedness, in any manner that complies with this covenant. Indebtedness under Credit Facilities outstanding on the date on which Notes are first issued and authenticated under the Indenture will initially be deemed to have been incurred on such date in reliance on the exception provided by clause (1) of the definition of Permitted Debt. The accrual of interest, the accretion or amortization of original issue discount, the payment of interest on any Indebtedness in the form of additional Indebtedness with the same terms, the reclassification of preferred stock as Indebtedness due to a change in accounting principles, and the payment or accrual of dividends on Disqualified Stock or preferred stock will not be deemed to be an incurrence of Indebtedness or an issuance of Disqualified Stock or preferred stock for purposes of this covenant; provided, in each such case, that the amount of any such accrual, accretion or payment is included in Fixed Charges of Aeroflex as accrued. Notwithstanding any other provision of this covenant, the maximum amount of Indebtedness that Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary may incur pursuant to this covenant shall not be deemed to be exceeded solely as a result of fluctuations in exchange rates or currency values.
 
Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary, any net cash proceeds, marketable securities or Qualified Proceeds utilized for any Restricted Payment pursuant to clause (3)(b) of the first paragraph of, or clauses (2), (5) or (17) of the second paragraph of, the covenant described above under the caption “—Restricted Payments”, or that are utilized for the incurrence of Indebtedness pursuant to clause (19) of this covenant, shall not be utilized for any Restricted Payment or incurrence of Indebtedness under the other provisions referred to in this sentence. Furthermore, any net cash proceeds utilized for any redemption of Notes pursuant to the first paragraph under “Optional Redemption” shall be excluded from, and such net cash proceeds shall not include the net cash proceeds utilized to incur indebtedness under, clause (19) of this covenant.
 
The amount of any Indebtedness outstanding as of any date will be:
 
(1)the accreted value of the Indebtedness, in the case of any Indebtedness issued with original issue discount;
 
(2)the principal amount of the Indebtedness, in the case of any other Indebtedness;
 
(3)in respect of Indebtedness of another Person secured by a Lien on the assets of the specified Person, the lesser of:
 
 (a)the Fair Market Value of such assets at the date of determination; and
 
 (b)the amount of the Indebtedness subject to such Lien of the other Person;
 
92
(4)with respect to Indebtedness of others supported by a guarantee of Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary, the lesser of the amount of the primary indebtedness and any stated limit on recourse under the guarantee; and
 
(5)the amount of the Indebtedness in respect of any Hedging Obligations at any time shall be equal to the amount payable as a result of the termination of such Hedging Obligations at such time.

 
99

Aeroflex will not incur, create, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise become liable for any Indebtedness that is contractually subordinate or junior in right of payment to any Indebtedness of Aeroflex unless such Indebtedness is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes to the same extent and in the same manner as such Indebtedness is subordinated to other Indebtedness of Aeroflex. No Guarantor will incur, create, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise become liable for any Indebtedness that is contractually subordinate or junior in right of payment to any Indebtedness of such Guarantor unless such Indebtedness is expressly subordinated in right of payment to such Guarantor’s Note Guarantee to the same extent and in the same manner as such Indebtedness is subordinated to other Indebtedness of Aeroflex. No such Indebtedness will be considered to be senior by virtue of being secured on a first or junior priority basis. For purposes of the foregoing, no Indebtedness will be deemed to be contractually subordinate or junior in right of payment to any other Indebtedness of Aeroflex or a Guarantor solely by virtue of being unsecured or by virtue of the fact that the holders of secured indebtedness have entered into intercreditor agreements giving one or more of such holders priority over the other holders in the collateral held by them.
 
Liens
 
Aeroflex will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien of any kind (other than Permitted Liens) securing Indebtedness upon any asset (“Primary Lien”), now owned or hereafter acquired, unless all payments due under the Indenture and the Notes are secured on an equal and ratable basis with the obligations so secured (or, in the case of subordinated Indebtedness, prior or senior thereto, with the same relative priority as the Notes shall have with respect to such subordinated Indebtedness) until such time as such obligations are no longer secured by a Lien.
 
Any Lien created for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the immediately preceding paragraph shall automatically and unconditionally be released and discharged upon the release and discharge of the Primary Lien, without any further action on the part of any Person.
 
Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Subsidiaries
Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Subsidiaries
 
Aeroflex will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create or permit to exist or become effective any consensual encumbrance or restriction on the ability of any Restricted Subsidiary to:
 
(1)pay dividends or make any other distributions on its Capital Stock to Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or pay any Indebtedness owed to Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries;
 
(2)make loans or advances to Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; or
 
(3)transfer any of its properties or assets to Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries.
 
However, the preceding restrictions will not apply to encumbrances or restrictions existing under or by reason of:
 
(1)
agreements in effect on the date of the Indenture (including those governing Existing Indebtedness and Credit Facilities) and any amendments, restatements, modifications, renewals, increases, supplements, refundings, replacements or refinancings of those agreements; provided that the amendments, restatements, modifications, renewals, increases, supplements, refundings, replacements or refinancings are not materially more restrictive, taken as a whole, with respect to such dividend and other payment restrictions than those contained in those agreements on the date of the Indenture;
 
(2)the Indenture, the Notes and the Note Guarantees;
 
(3)applicable law, rule, regulation or order;
 
93

(4)
any agreement or instrument of a Person acquired by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries as in effect at the time of such acquisition (except to the extent such agreement or instrument was incurred or issued in connection with or in contemplation of such acquisition), which encumbrance or restriction is not applicable to any Person, or the properties or assets of any Person, other than the Person, or the property or assets of the Person, so acquired; provided that, in the case of Indebtedness, such Indebtedness was permitted by the terms of the Indenture to be incurred;
 
(5)customary non-assignment provisions in leases, contracts, licenses and other agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business;

100
 
(6)purchase money obligations for property acquired in the ordinary course of business and Capital Lease Obligations that impose restrictions on the property purchased or leased of the nature described in clause (3) of the preceding paragraph;
 
(7)any agreement for the sale or other disposition of Equity Interests or assets of a Restricted Subsidiary or an agreement entered into for the sale of assets that restricts distributions by that Restricted Subsidiary pending such sale or other disposition;
 
(8)
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness; provided that the restrictions contained in the agreements governing such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness are not materially more restrictive, taken as a whole, than those contained in the agreements governing the Indebtedness being refinanced;
 
(9)Liens permitted to be incurred under the provisions of the covenant described above under the caption “—Liens” that limit the right of the debtor to dispose of the assets subject to such Liens;
 
(10)provisions limiting the disposition or distribution of assets or property in joint venture agreements, limited liability company operating agreements, partnership agreements, asset sale agreements, sale-leaseback agreements, options, stock sale agreements, lease agreements, licenses and other similar agreements entered into with the approval of Aeroflex’s Board of Directors, which limitation is applicable only to the assets that are the subject of such agreements;
 
(11)restrictions on cash or other deposits or net worth imposed by customers, suppliers or landlords under contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business;
 
(12)
provisions in agreements or instruments that prohibit the payment of dividends or the making of other distributions with respect to any Capital Stock of a Person on other than a pro rata basis;
 
(13)any encumbrance or restriction contained in any Indebtedness incurred by a Foreign Subsidiary pursuant to the provisions of the covenant described under “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock”;
 
(14)any other Indebtedness, Disqualified Stock or preferred stock of any Restricted Subsidiary permitted to be incurred or issued, as applicable, subsequent to the date of the Indenture pursuant to the provisions of the covenant described under “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock” and any encumbrance or restriction contained in such Indebtedness does not, in the good faith judgment of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex, adversely affect the ability of Aeroflex and the Guarantors, taken as a whole, from making scheduled payments of cash interest on the Notes when due; and
 
(15)in the case of clause (3) of the first paragraph of this covenant, encumbrances or restrictions:
 
 (a)that restrict in a customary manner the subletting, assignment or transfer of any property or asset that is a lease, license, conveyance or contract or similar property or asset,
 
 (b)existing by virtue of any transfer of, agreement to transfer, option or right with respect to, or Lien on, any property or assets of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries not otherwise prohibited by the Indenture, or
 
 (c)arising or agreed to in the ordinary course of business, not relating to any Indebtedness, and that do not, individually or in the aggregate, detract from the value of property or assets of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in any manner material to Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries;
 
94

(16)
any encumbrance or restriction existing under or by reason of Indebtedness or other contractual requirement of a Receivables Entity or any Standard Securitization Undertaking, in each case in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction; provided that such restrictions apply only to such Receivables Entity and Receivables and Related Assets; and
 
(17)
any encumbrances or restrictions imposed by any amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals, increases, supplements, refundings, replacements or refinancings of the contracts, instruments or obligations referred to in clauses (1) through (16) above; provided that the encumbrances or restrictions in such amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals, increases, supplements, refundings, replacements or refinancings are not materially more restrictive, in the good faith judgment of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex, taken as a whole, than the encumbrances or restrictions prior to such amendment, modification, restatement, renewal, increase, supplement, refunding, replacement or refinancing.

101
 
 Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets
 
Aeroflex will not, directly or indirectly: (1) consolidate or merge with or into another Person; or (2) sell, assign, transfer, convey (not including any conveyance, if any, resulting solely from the creation of any Lien), lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole, in one or more related transactions, to another Person, unless:
 
(1)
either: (a) Aeroflex is the surviving corporation; or (b) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than Aeroflex) or to which such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, lease or other disposition has been made is a an entity organized or existing under the laws of the United States, any state of the United States or the District of Columbia; provided that, in the case of a Person that is not a corporation, a co-obligor of the Notes is a corporation;
 
(2)the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than Aeroflex) or the Person to which such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, lease or other disposition has been made assumes all the obligations of Aeroflex under the Notes and the Indenture pursuant to a supplemental Indenture in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee;
 
(3)immediately after such transaction, no Default or Event of Default exists;
 
(4)except in the case of a consolidation, amalgamation or merger with or into or a sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all of the property and assets of Aeroflex and any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to a wholly-owned Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex, Aeroflex, or the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than Aeroflex), or to which such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, lease or other disposition has been made would, on the date of such transaction after giving pro forma effect thereto and any related financing transactions as if the same had occurred at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter period:
 
 (a)be permitted to incur at least $1.00 of additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock,” or
 
 (b)would have a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio that is equal to or greater than the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of Aeroflex immediately prior to such transaction; and
 
(5)Aeroflex or such surviving Person shall deliver an opinion of counsel to the Trustee stating that such merger or consolidation complies with the Indenture.
 
This “Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets” covenant will not apply to:
 
(1)a merger of Aeroflex with an Affiliate solely for the purpose of reincorporating Aeroflex in another jurisdiction; or
 
(2)any consolidation or merger, or any sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, lease or other disposition of assets between or among Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries.
 
95

Upon any consolidation or merger, or any sale, assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all of the property and assets of Aeroflex in a transaction that is subject to, and complies with, the requirements of this covenant, the successor Person formed by such consolidation or into or with which Aeroflex is merged or to which such sale, assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance or other disposition is made shall succeed to, and be substituted for (so that from and after the date of such consolidation, merger, sale, assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance or such other disposition, the provisions of the Indenture shall be deemed to refer instead to such other Person and not to Aeroflex), and may exercise every right and power of Aeroflex under the Indenture with the same effect as if such successor Person had been named therein; provided, however, Aeroflex, as the predecessor, shall not be relieved from the obligation to pay the principal of, and any interest on, the Notes except in the case of a sale of all of Aeroflex’s assets in a transaction that is subject to, and complies with, the provisions of this covenant.

102
 
 Transactions with Affiliates
 
Aeroflex will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, make any payment to, or sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of any of its properties or assets to, or purchase any property or assets from, or enter into or make or amend any transaction, contract, agreement, understanding, loan, advance or guarantee with, or for the benefit of, any Affiliate of Aeroflex (each, an “Affiliate Transaction”), unless:
 
(1)the Affiliate Transaction is on terms that are not materially less favorable to Aeroflex or the relevant Restricted Subsidiary than those that would have been obtained in a comparable transaction by Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary with an unrelated Person; and
 
(2)Aeroflex delivers to the Trustee:
 
 (a)with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of related Affiliate Transactions involving aggregate consideration in excess of $10.0 million, a resolution of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex set forth in an officers’ certificate certifying that such Affiliate Transaction complies with this covenant and that such Affiliate Transaction has been approved by a majority of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex (and, if any, a majority of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex with respect to such transaction); and
 
 (b)with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of related Affiliate Transactions involving aggregate consideration in excess of $25.0 million (other than Affiliate Transactions in connection with joint bidding, joint marketing or other similar arrangements for the provision of services in the ordinary course of services in the Permitted Business), an opinion as to the fairness to Aeroflex or such Subsidiary of such Affiliate Transaction from a financial point of view issued by an accounting, appraisal or investment banking firm of national standing.
 
The following items will not be deemed to be Affiliate Transactions and, therefore, will not be subject to the provisions of the prior paragraph:
 
(1)any consulting or employment agreement or arrangement, benefit arrangement or plan, incentive compensation plan, stock option or stock ownership plan, employee benefit plan, severance arrangements, expense reimbursement arrangements, officer or director indemnification agreement or any similar arrangement entered into by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries for the benefit of directors, officers, employees and consultants of Aeroflex or a direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex and payments and transactions pursuant thereto, including, without limitation, those payments described under the captions “Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements” and “Management—Compensation of Directors” in this prospectus and otherwise in the ordinary course of business;
 
(2)transactions between or among Aeroflex and/or its Restricted Subsidiaries;
 
(3)transactions with a Person (other than an Unrestricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex) that is an Affiliate of Aeroflex solely because Aeroflex owns, directly or through a Restricted Subsidiary, an Equity Interest in, or controls, such Person;
 
(4)payment of reasonable directors fees to directors of Aeroflex or any direct or indirect parent or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex and the provision of customary indemnification and payment of other reasonable fees, compensation, benefits and indemnifications paid or entered into with directors, officers, employees and consultants of Aeroflex or any direct or indirect parent or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex;
 
96

(5)any issuance of Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock) of Aeroflex to Affiliates of Aeroflex or any contribution to the capital of Aeroflex (other than as Disqualified Stock) and the granting or performance of registration rights in respect of any such Equity Interests;
 
(6)Restricted Payments and Permitted Investments that do not violate the covenant described under the caption “—Restricted Payments;”
 
(7)payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses not in excess of the amounts specified in, or determined pursuant to, the Management Agreement as in effect on the date of the Indenture, and the other payments and agreements described above under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in this prospectus and any renewals, amendments, extensions or replacements of any such agreement or arrangements (so long as such renewals, amendments, extensions or replacements are not, taken as a whole, materially less favorable to the holders of the Notes as determined by the Board of Directors in its reasonable good faith judgment) and the transactions contemplated thereby;

103
 
(8)Permitted Payments to Parent;
 
(9)any agreement or arrangements as in effect on the date of the Indenture and any renewals, amendments, extensions or replacements of any such agreement or arrangements (as long as such renewals, amendments, extensions or replacements are not, taken as a whole, materially less favorable to the Holders of the Notes as determined by the Board of Directors of Aeroflex in its reasonable good faith judgment) and the transactions contemplated thereby;
 
(10)loans, guarantees of loans, advances, and other extensions of credit to or on behalf of current and former officers, directors, employees, and consultants of Aeroflex, a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex, or a direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex made in the ordinary course of business or for the purpose of permitting such Persons to purchase Capital Stock of Aeroflex or any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex or in connection with any relocation costs, in an amount not to exceed $2.0 million in the aggregate at any one time outstanding;
 
(11)sales or purchases of goods or provision of services in the ordinary course of business, at terms no less favorable to Aeroflex or the applicable Restricted Subsidiary, as determined in the good faith judgment of Aeroflex, than those available to third party customers or suppliers, to or with an Affiliate which would constitute an Affiliate Transaction solely as a result of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries being in or under common control with such Affiliate and otherwise in compliance with the terms of the Indenture;
 
(12)repurchases of Notes if repurchased on the same terms as offered to Persons that are not Affiliates of Aeroflex;
 
(13)
transactions with a joint venture engaged in a Permitted Business; provided that all the outstanding ownership interests of such joint venture are owned only by Aeroflex, its Restricted Subsidiaries and Persons that are not Affiliates of Aeroflex;
 
(14)any transactions with a Receivables Entity effected as part of a Qualified Receivables Transaction;
 
(15)the Transactions, and the payment of all fees and expenses related to the Transactions, in each case, as contemplated by this prospectus; and
 
(16)payments by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex to any Principal for any financial advisory, financing, underwriting or placement services, or in respect of any investment banking activities, including, without limitation, in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, which payments are approved by the majority of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex in good faith.
 
 Business Activities
 
Aeroflex will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, engage in any business other than Permitted Businesses, except to such extent as would not be material to Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole.

 
97

 Additional Note Guarantees
 
If any of Aeroflex’s Restricted Subsidiaries (i) that is a Domestic Subsidiary incurs any Indebtedness in excess of $10.0 million (other than Indebtedness permitted to be incurred pursuant to clauses (6), (7), (8), (10), (11), (13), (15) or (17) of the second paragraph of the covenant described under “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock”) or (ii) guarantees any Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of the Guarantors, then that Subsidiary will become a Guarantor and execute a supplemental Indenture and deliver an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the Trustee within 20 business days of the date on which such Indebtedness is incurred; provided that the foregoing shall not apply to any Receivables Entity or any Subsidiary that has properly been designated as an Unrestricted Subsidiary in accordance with the Indenture for so long as it continues to constitute an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
 
104
 Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries

The Board of Directors of Aeroflex may designate any Restricted Subsidiary to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary if that designation would not cause a Default. If a Restricted Subsidiary is designated as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, the aggregate Fair Market Value of all outstanding Investments owned by Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries in the Subsidiary designated as Unrestricted (after giving effect to any sale of Equity Interests of such Subsidiary in connection with such designation) will be deemed to be an Investment made as of the time of the designation and will either reduce the amount available for Restricted Payments under the covenant described above under the caption “—Restricted Payments” or under one or more clauses of the definition of Permitted Investments, as determined by Aeroflex. That designation will only be permitted if the Investment would be permitted at that time and if the Restricted Subsidiary otherwise meets the definition of an Unrestricted Subsidiary. The Board of Directors of Aeroflex may redesignate any Unrestricted Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary if that redesignation would not cause a Default.
 
Any designation of a Subsidiary of Aeroflex as an Unrestricted Subsidiary will be evidenced to the Trustee by filing with the Trustee a certified copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex giving effect to such designation and an officers’ certificate certifying that such designation complied with the preceding conditions and was permitted by the covenant described above under the caption “—Restricted Payments.” If, at any time, any Unrestricted Subsidiary would no longer meet the preceding requirements for designation as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, it will thereafter cease to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary for purposes of the Indenture and any Indebtedness of such Subsidiary will be deemed to be incurred by a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex as of such date and, if such Indebtedness is not permitted to be incurred as of such date under the covenant described under the caption “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock,” Aeroflex will be in default of such covenant. The Board of Directors of Aeroflex may at any time designate any Unrestricted Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex; provided that such designation will be deemed to be an incurrence of Indebtedness by a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex of any outstanding Indebtedness of such Unrestricted Subsidiary, and such designation will only be permitted if (1) (a) such Indebtedness is permitted under the covenant described under the caption “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock,” calculated on a pro forma basis as if such designation had occurred at the beginning of the four-quarter reference period, or (b) Aeroflex’s Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is equal to or greater immediately following such designation than Aeroflex’s Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio immediately preceding such designation, calculated on a pro forma basis as if such designation had occurred at the beginning of the four-quarter reference period; and (2) no Default or Event of Default would be in existence following such designation.
 
 Payments for Consent
 
Aeroflex will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, pay or cause to be paid any consideration to any Holder of Notes for or as an inducement to any consent, waiver or amendment of any of the terms or provisions of the Indenture or the Notes unless such consideration is offered to be paid and is paid to all Holders of the Notes that consent, waive or agree to amend in the time frame set forth in the solicitation documents relating to such consent, waiver or agreement.
 
Reports
 
Whether or not required by the rules and regulations of the SEC, so long as any Notes are outstanding, Aeroflex will furnish to the Holders of Notes or cause the Trustee to furnish to the Holders of Notes, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations (together with extensions granted by the SEC) for a filer that is a “non-accelerated filer” plus five Business Days:
 
(1)substantially the same quarterly and annual reports that would be required to be filed with the SEC on Forms 10-Q and 10-K if Aeroflex were required to file such reports; and
 
98

(2)substantially the same current reports that would be required to be filed with the SEC on Form 8-K if Aeroflex were required to file such reports.
 
All such reports will be prepared in all material respects in accordance with all of the rules and regulations applicable to such reports. Each annual report on Form 10-K will include a report on Aeroflex’s consolidated financial statements by Aeroflex’s certified independent accountants. In addition, following the consummation of the exchange offer, Aeroflex will file a copy of each of the reports referred to in clauses (1) and (2) above with the SEC for public availability within the time periods specified in the rules and regulations applicable to such reports for a person that is a “non-accelerated filer” (unless the SEC will not accept such a filing) and will post the reports on its website within those time periods.
 
If, at any time, Aeroflex is no longer subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for any reason, Aeroflex will nevertheless continue filing the reports specified in the preceding paragraphs of this covenant with the SEC within the time periods specified above unless the SEC will not accept such a filing. Aeroflex will not take any action for the purpose of causing the SEC not to accept any such filings. If, notwithstanding the foregoing, the SEC will not accept Aeroflex’s filings for any reason, Aeroflex will post the reports referred to in the preceding paragraphs on its website within the time periods that would apply if Aeroflex were required to file those reports with the SEC for a person that is a “non-accelerated filer”.

105
 
If Aeroflex has designated any of its Subsidiaries as Unrestricted Subsidiaries, then the quarterly and annual financial information required by the preceding paragraphs will include a reasonably detailed presentation, either on the face of the financial statements or in the footnotes thereto, and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries separate from the financial condition and results of operations of the Unrestricted Subsidiaries of Aeroflex.
 
In the event that (1) the rules and regulations of the SEC permit Aeroflex and any direct or indirect parent entity of Aeroflex to report at such entity’s level on a consolidated basis, (2) such direct or indirect parent entity is not engaged in any business other than the Permitted Business of Aeroflex and (3) such direct or indirect parent entity’s consolidated capitalization (including cash and cash equivalents) does not differ materially from that of Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, the information and reports required by this covenant may be those of such parent entity on a consolidated basis; provided that such information and reports distinguish in all material respects between Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries and such direct or indirect parent entity and its other subsidiaries, if any.
 
In addition, Aeroflex agrees that, for so long as any Notes remain outstanding, if at any time it is not required to file with the SEC the reports required by the preceding paragraphs, it will furnish to the Holders of Notes and to securities analysts and prospective investors, upon their request, the information required to be delivered pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act.
 
Events of Default and Remedies
 
Each of the following is an “Event of Default”:
 
(1)default for 30 days in the payment when due of interest on the Notes;
 
(2)default in the payment when due (at maturity, upon redemption or otherwise) of the principal of, or premium, if any, on, the Notes;
 
(3)failure by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries for 30 days after notice to Aeroflex by the Trustee or the Holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding voting as a single class to comply with the provisions described under the captions “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control,” “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales,” or “—Certain Covenants—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets;”
 
(4)failure by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries for 60 days after notice to Aeroflex by the Trustee or the Holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding voting as a single class to comply with any of the other agreements in the Indenture;
 
(5)default under any mortgage, indenture or instrument under which there may be issued or by which there may be secured or evidenced any Indebtedness for money borrowed by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (or the payment of which is guaranteed by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries), whether such Indebtedness or guarantee now exists, or is created after the date of the Indenture, if that default:
 
99

 (a)
is caused by a failure to make any payment when due at the final maturity of such Indebtedness (a “Payment Default”); or
 
 (b)results in the acceleration of such Indebtedness prior to its express maturity,
 
and, in each case, the principal amount of any such Indebtedness, together with the principal amount of any other such Indebtedness under which there has been a Payment Default or the maturity of which has been so accelerated, aggregates $50.0 million or more;

 
106

(6)failure by Aeroflex or any of its Significant Subsidiaries or any group of Restricted Subsidiaries that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary to pay final and non-appealable judgments entered by a court or courts of competent jurisdiction aggregating in excess of $50.0 million (net of any amounts covered by insurance or pursuant to which Aeroflex is indemnified to the extent that the third party under such agreement does not deny its obligations thereunder), which judgments are not paid, discharged or stayed for a period of 60 days and, in the event such judgment is covered by insurance, an enforcement proceeding has been commenced by any creditor upon such judgment or decree that is not promptly stayed;
 
(7)except as permitted by the Indenture, any Note Guarantee is held in any judicial proceeding to be unenforceable or invalid or ceases for any reason to be in full force and effect, or any Guarantor, or any Person acting on behalf of any Guarantor, denies or disaffirms its obligations under its Note Guarantee; and
 
(8)certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency described in the Indenture with respect to Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries that is a Significant Subsidiary or any group of Restricted Subsidiaries that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary.
 
In the case of an Event of Default arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency, with respect to Aeroflex, any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex that is a Significant Subsidiary or any group of Restricted Subsidiaries of Aeroflex that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary, all outstanding Notes will become due and payable immediately without further action or notice. If any other Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee or the Holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may declare all the Notes to be due and payable immediately and, upon any such declaration, the Notes will become due and payable immediately.
 
If an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee may pursue any available remedy to collect the payment of the principal amount of premium, if any, or interest on the Notes or to enforce the performance of any provision of the Notes or the Indenture. The Trustee may maintain a proceeding even if it does not possess any of the Notes or does not produce any of them in the proceeding.
 
Holders of the Notes may not enforce the Indenture or the Notes except as provided in the Indenture and the Trust Indenture Act. Subject to certain limitations set forth in the Indenture, Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may direct the Trustee in its exercise of any remedy available to the Trustee or any trust or power conferred on it. The Trustee may withhold from Holders of the Notes notice of any continuing Default or Event of Default if, and so long as, in good faith, it determines that withholding notice is in their interest, except a Default or Event of Default relating to the payment of principal, interest or premium.
 
Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the duties of the Trustee, the Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers under the Indenture at the request or direction of any Holders of Notes unless such Holders have offered to the Trustee indemnity or security reasonably satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or expense. Except to enforce the right to receive payment of principal, premium, if any, or interest when due, no Holder of a Note may pursue any remedy with respect to the Indenture or the Notes unless:
 
(1)such Holder has previously given the Trustee notice that an Event of Default is continuing;
 
(2)Holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes have made a written request to the Trustee to pursue the remedy;
 
100

(3)such Holders have offered, and, if requested, have provided, the Trustee security or indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or expense;
 
(4)the Trustee has not complied with such request within 60 days after the receipt of the request and the offer of security or indemnity; and
 
(5)Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes have not given the Trustee a direction inconsistent with such request within such 60-day period.
 
A Holder of a Note may not use the Indenture to prejudice the rights of another Holder of a Note or to obtain a preference or priority over another Holder of a Note.
 
The Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes by notice to the Trustee may, on behalf of the Holders of all of the Notes, rescind an acceleration or waive any existing Default or Event of Default and its consequences under the Indenture except a continuing Default or Event of Default in the payment of interest or premium on, or the principal of, the Notes.

107
 
No Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees and Stockholders
 
No past, present or future director, officer, employee, partner, manager, agent, member, incorporator (or Person forming any limited liability company) or stockholder of Aeroflex or of any Guarantor, as such, will have any liability for any obligations of Aeroflex or the Guarantors under the Notes, the Indenture, the Note Guarantees or for any claim based on, in respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their creation. Each Holder of Notes by accepting a Note and a Note Guarantee waives and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part of the consideration for issuance of the Notes and the Note Guarantees. The waiver may not be effective to waive liabilities under the federal securities laws.
 
Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance
 
Aeroflex may at any time, at the option of its Board of Directors evidenced by a resolution set forth in an Officers’ Certificate, elect to have all of its obligations discharged with respect to the outstanding Notes and all of the obligations of the Guarantors discharged with respect to their Note Guarantees subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the third paragraph hereof (“Legal Defeasance”), except for:
 
(1)the rights of Holders of outstanding Notes to receive payments in respect of the principal of, or interest or premium on, such Notes when such payments are due from the trust referred to below;
 
(2)Aeroflex’s obligations with respect to the Notes concerning issuing temporary Notes, registration of Notes, mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Notes and the maintenance of an office or agency for payment and money for security payments held in trust;
 
(3)the rights, powers, trusts, duties and immunities of the Trustee, and Aeroflex’s and the Guarantors’ obligations in connection therewith; and
 
(4)the Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance provisions of the Indenture.
 
In addition, Aeroflex may at any time, at the option of its Board of Directors evidenced by a resolutions set forth in an Officers’ Certificate, elect to have the obligations of Aeroflex and the Guarantors released with respect to certain covenants (including its obligation to make Change of Control Offers and Asset Sale Offers) that are described in the Indenture subject to the satisfaction of the conditions of the third paragraph hereof (“Covenant Defeasance”), and thereafter any omission to comply with those covenants will not constitute a Default or Event of Default with respect to the Notes. In the event Covenant Defeasance occurs, certain events (not including non-payment, bankruptcy, receivership, rehabilitation and insolvency events) described under “—Events of Default and Remedies” will no longer constitute an Event of Default with respect to the Notes.
 
In order to exercise either Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance:
 
(1)Aeroflex must irrevocably deposit with the Trustee, in trust, for the benefit of the Holders of the Notes, cash in U.S. dollars, non-callable Government Securities, or a combination of cash in U.S. dollars and non-callable Government Securities, in amounts as will be sufficient, in the opinion of a nationally recognized investment bank, appraisal firm or firm of independent public accountants, to pay the principal of, or interest and premium on, the outstanding Notes on the stated date for payment thereof or on the applicable redemption date, as the case may be, and Aeroflex must specify whether the Notes are being defeased to such stated date for payment or to a particular redemption date;
 
101

(2)in the case of Legal Defeasance, Aeroflex must deliver to the Trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably acceptable to the Trustee confirming that (a) Aeroflex has received from, or there has been published by, the Internal Revenue Service a ruling or (b) since the date of the Indenture, there has been a change in the applicable federal income tax law, in either case to the effect that, and based thereon such opinion of counsel will confirm that, the Holders of the outstanding Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of such Legal Defeasance and will be subject to federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such Legal Defeasance had not occurred;
 
(3)in the case of Covenant Defeasance, Aeroflex must deliver to the Trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably acceptable to the Trustee confirming that the Holders of the outstanding Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of such Covenant Defeasance and will be subject to federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such Covenant Defeasance had not occurred;

108
 
(4)no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing on the date of such deposit (other than a Default or Event of Default resulting from the borrowing of funds to be applied to such deposit);
 
(5)such Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance will not result in a breach or violation of, or constitute a default under, any material agreement or instrument (other than the Indenture) to which Aeroflex or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which Aeroflex or any of its Subsidiaries is bound;
 
(6)Aeroflex must deliver to the Trustee an Officers’ Certificate stating that the deposit was not made by Aeroflex with the intent of preferring the Holders of the Notes over the other creditors of Aeroflex with the intent of defeating, hindering, delaying or defrauding any creditors of Aeroflex or others; and
 
(7)Aeroflex must deliver to the Trustee an Officers’ Certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that all conditions precedent relating to the Legal Defeasance or the Covenant Defeasance have been complied with.
 
Amendment, Supplement and Waiver
 
Except as provided in the next two succeeding paragraphs, the Indenture or the Notes or the Note Guarantees may be amended or supplemented with the consent of the Holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding (including, without limitation, consents obtained in connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer for, Notes), and any existing Default or Event of Default or compliance with any provision of the Indenture or the Notes or the Note Guarantees may be waived with the consent of the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes (including, without limitation, consents obtained in connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer for, Notes).
 
Without the consent of each Holder of the Notes affected, an amendment, supplement or waiver may not (with respect to any Notes held by a non-consenting Holder):
 
(1)reduce the principal amount of Notes whose Holders must consent to an amendment, supplement or waiver;
 
(2)reduce the principal of or change the fixed maturity of any Note or alter the provisions with respect to the date of or redemption price payable in connection with the redemption of the Notes (other than provisions relating to the covenants described above under the caption “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders”);
 
(3)reduce the rate of or change the time for payment of interest, including default interest, on any Note;
 
(4)waive a Default or Event of Default in the payment of principal of, or interest or premium on, the Notes (except a rescission of acceleration of the Notes by the Holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes and a waiver of the payment default that resulted from such acceleration);
 
(5)make any Note payable in money other than that stated in the Notes;
 
102

(6)make any change in the provisions of the Indenture relating to waivers of past Defaults or the rights of holders of Notes to receive payments of principal of, or interest or premium on, the Notes;
 
(7)waive a redemption payment with respect to any Note (other than a payment required by one of the covenants described above under the caption “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders”);
 
(8)release any Guarantor from any of its obligations under its Note Guarantee or the Indenture, except in accordance with the terms of the Indenture; or
 
(9)make any change in the preceding amendment and waiver provisions.
 
Notwithstanding the preceding paragraphs, without the consent of any Holder of Notes, Aeroflex, the Guarantors and the Trustee may amend or supplement the Indenture, the Notes or the Note Guarantees:
 
(1)to cure any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency;
 
(2)to provide for uncertificated Notes in addition to or in place of certificated Notes;

109
 
(3)to provide for the assumption of Aeroflex’s or a Guarantor’s obligations to Holders of Notes and Note Guarantees in the case of a merger or consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of Aeroflex’s or such Guarantor’s assets, as applicable;
 
(4)to make any change that would provide any additional rights or benefits to the Holders of Notes or that does not adversely affect the legal rights under the Indenture of any such Holder;
 
(5)to comply with requirements of the SEC in order to effect or maintain the qualification of the Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act;
 
(6)to conform the text of the Indenture, the Note Guarantees or the Notes to any provision of this Description of Notes to the extent that an officer of Aeroflex certifies in good faith that such provision of the Indenture, the Note Guarantees or the Notes was intended to be a verbatim recitation of a provision of this Description of Notes;
 
(7)to provide for the issuance of additional Notes in accordance with the limitations set forth in the Indenture as of the date of the Indenture;
 
(8)to allow any Guarantor to execute a supplemental Indenture and/or a Note Guarantee with respect to the Notes;
 
(9)to comply with the rules of any applicable securities depositary;
 
(10)to provide for a successor trustee in accordance with the terms of the Indenture or to otherwise comply with any requirement of the Indenture; or
 
(11)to add a co-issuer or co-obligor of the Notes.
 
Where the consent of the Holders of the Notes is required to approve an amendment, supplement, waiver or consent under the Indenture, it is not necessary for the consent of the Holders of Notes to approve the particular form of any proposed amendment, supplement, waiver and consent, but it is sufficient if such consent approves the substance thereof.
 
Satisfaction and Discharge
 
The Indenture will be discharged and will cease to be of further effect as to all Notes issued thereunder, when:
 
(1)either:
 
 (a)all Notes that have been authenticated, except lost, stolen or destroyed Notes that have been replaced or paid and Notes for whose payment money has been deposited in trust and thereafter repaid to Aeroflex, have been delivered to the Trustee for cancellation; or
 
103

 (b)all Notes that have not been delivered to the Trustee for cancellation have become due and payable by reason of the mailing of a notice of redemption or otherwise or will become due and payable within one year and Aeroflex or any Guarantor has irrevocably deposited or caused to be deposited with the Trustee as trust funds in trust solely for the benefit of the Holders, cash in U.S. dollars, non-callable Government Securities, or a combination of cash in U.S. dollars and non-callable Government Securities, in amounts as will be sufficient, without consideration of any reinvestment of interest, to pay and discharge the entire Indebtedness on the Notes not delivered to the Trustee for cancellation, for principal, premium and accrued interest to the date of maturity or redemption;
 
(2)no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing on the date of the deposit (other than a Default or Event of Default resulting from the borrowing of funds to be applied to such deposit);
 
(3)Aeroflex or any Guarantor has paid or caused to be paid all sums payable by it under the Indenture; and
 
(4)Aeroflex has delivered irrevocable instructions to the Trustee under the Indenture to apply the deposited money toward the payment of the Notes at maturity or on the redemption date, as the case may be.
 
In addition, Aeroflex must deliver an Officers’ Certificate and an opinion of counsel to the Trustee stating that all conditions precedent to satisfaction and discharge have been satisfied.

 
110
Concerning the Trustee
 
If the Trustee becomes a creditor of Aeroflex or any Guarantor, the Indenture and the Trust Indenture Act limit the right of the Trustee to obtain payment of claims in certain cases, or to realize on certain property received in respect of any such claim as security or otherwise. The Trustee will be permitted to engage in other transactions; however, if it acquires any conflicting interest it must eliminate such conflict within 90 days, apply to the SEC for permission to continue as Trustee (if the Indenture has been qualified under the Trust Indenture Act) or resign.
 
The Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for exercising any remedy available to the Trustee, subject to certain exceptions to be specified in the Indenture. The Indenture provides that if an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee will exercise such of the rights and powers vested in it by the Indenture, and use the same degree of care and skill in its exercise, as a prudent person would exercise or use under the circumstances in the conduct of such person’s own affairs. Subject to such provisions, the Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the request of any Holder of Notes, unless such Holder has offered to the Trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to the Trustee against any loss, liability or expense.
 
Additional Information
 
Anyone who receives this prospectus may obtain a copy of the Indenture without charge by writing to Aeroflex Incorporated, 35 South Service Road, P.O. Box 6022, Plainview, New York 11803, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.
 
Governing Law
 
The Indenture, the Notes and the Note Guarantees will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
 
Certain Definitions
 
Set forth below are certain defined terms used in the Indenture. Reference is made to the Indenture for a full disclosure of all defined terms used therein, as well as any other capitalized terms used herein for which no definition is provided.
 
“Acquired Debt” means, with respect to any specified Person:
 
(1)Indebtedness of any other Person existing at the time such other Person is merged with or into or became a Subsidiary of such specified Person, whether or not such Indebtedness is incurred in connection with, or in contemplation of, such other Person merging with or into, or becoming a Subsidiary of, such specified Person; and
 
104

(2)Indebtedness secured by a Lien encumbering any asset acquired by such specified Person.
 
“Affiliate” of any specified Person means any other Person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with such specified Person. For purposes of this definition, “control,” as used with respect to any Person, means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise; provided that beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the Voting Stock of a Person will be deemed to be control. For purposes of this definition, the terms “controlling,” “controlled by” and “under common control with” have correlative meanings.
 
“Applicable Premium” means, as calculated by Aeroflex, with respect to any Note on any redemption date, the greater of:
 
(1)1.0% of the principal amount of the Note; or
 
(2)the excess of:
 
 (a)the present value at such redemption date of (i) the redemption price of the Note at August 15, 2011 (such redemption price being set forth in the table appearing above under the caption “—Optional Redemption”) plus (ii) all required interest payments due on the Note through August 15, 2011 (excluding accrued but unpaid interest to such redemption date), computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate as of such redemption date plus 50 basis points; over

111
 
 (b)the principal amount of the Note, if greater.
 
“Asset Sale” means:
 
(1)
the sale, lease, conveyance or other disposition of any assets or rights; provided that the sale, lease, conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole will be governed by the provisions of the Indenture described above under the caption “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control” and/or the provisions described above under the caption “—Certain Covenants—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets” and not by the provisions of the Asset Sale covenant; and
 
(2)the issuance of Equity Interests in any of Aeroflex’s Restricted Subsidiaries or the sale of Equity Interests in any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than directors’ qualifying Equity Interests or Equity Interests required by applicable law to be held by a Person other than Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary).
 
Notwithstanding the preceding, none of the following items will be deemed to be an Asset Sale:
 
(1)any single transaction or series of related transactions that involves assets having a Fair Market Value of less than $2.5 million;
 
(2)a transfer, sale or other disposition of assets (including Equity Interests) between or among Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries;
 
(3)an issuance of Equity Interests by a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex to Aeroflex or to a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex;
 
(4)the licensing of intellectual property or other general intangibles to third Persons on terms approved by the Board of Directors of Aeroflex in good faith;
 
(5)the sale, lease, sublease or other disposition of any property or equipment that is no longer used or has become damaged, worn-out, obsolete, or otherwise unsuitable or not required for the ordinary course of business of Aeroflex or its Restricted Subsidiaries;
 
(6)the sale or other disposition of cash or Cash Equivalents;
 
(7)a Restricted Payment that does not violate the covenant described above under the caption “—Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments” or a Permitted Investment;
 
105

(8)the sale, lease, sub-lease, license, sub-license, consignment, conveyance or other disposition of accounts receivable, equipment, inventory or other assets in the ordinary course of business, including leases or subleases with respect to facilities that are temporarily not in use or pending their disposition, or accounts receivable in connection with the compromise, settlement or collection thereof;
 
(9)the creation of a Lien (but not the sale or other disposition of property subject to such Lien);
 
(10)the issuance of Equity Interests by a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex in which Aeroflex’s percentage interest (direct or indirect) in the Equity Interests of such Restricted Subsidiary, after giving effect to the issuance, is at least equal to its percentage interest prior thereto;
 
(11)leases, assignments or subleases of real or personal property to third persons either not interfering in any material respect with the business of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or entered into in the ordinary course of business;
 
(12)the good faith surrender or waiver of contract rights or the settlement, release or surrender of claims of any kind;
 
(13)to the extent allowable under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, any exchange of like property for use in a Permitted Business;
 
(14)the sale or other disposal of property or assets pursuant to the exercise of any remedies pursuant to the Credit Facilities or the other security documents relating to any Indebtedness permitted under the Indenture;

112
 
(15)
the transfer or sale of Receivables and Related Assets of the type specified in the definition of “Qualified Receivables Transaction” to a Receivables Entity or to any other Person in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction or the creation of a Lien on any such Receivables or Related Assets in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction;
 
(16)the sale of accounts receivable in the ordinary course of business;
 
(17)the issuance or sale of Equity Interests in or Indebtedness of any Unrestricted Subsidiary; and
 
(18)the disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Aeroflex in a transaction permitted under the covenant described under the caption “—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets.”
 
“Asset Sale Offer” has the meaning assigned to that term in the Indenture governing the Notes.
 
“Beneficial Owner” has the meaning assigned to such term in Rule 13d-3 and Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act, except that in calculating the beneficial ownership of any particular “person” (as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act), such “person” will be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all securities that such “person” has the right to acquire by conversion or exercise of other securities, whether such right is currently exercisable or is exercisable only after the passage of time. The terms “Beneficially Owns” and “Beneficially Owned” have a corresponding meaning.
 
“Board of Directors” means:
 
(1)with respect to a corporation, the board of directors of the corporation or any committee thereof duly authorized to act on behalf of such board;
 
(2)with respect to a partnership, the Board of Directors of the general partner of the partnership;
 
(3)with respect to a limited liability company, the managing member or members or any controlling committee or Board of Directors of such company or of the sole member or of the managing member thereof; and
 
(4)with respect to any other Person, the board or committee of such Person serving a similar function.
 
 
“Business Day” means any day other than a legal holiday.
 
 
“Calculation Date” has the meaning assigned to that term in the definition of “Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio”.
 
106

“Capital Lease Obligation” means, at the time any determination is to be made, the amount of the liability in respect of a capital lease that would at that time be required to be capitalized on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the Stated Maturity thereof shall be the date of the last payment of rent or any other amount due under such lease prior to the first date upon which such lease may be prepaid by the lessee without payment of a penalty.
 
“Capital Stock” means:
 
(1)in the case of a corporation, corporate stock;
 
(2)in the case of an association or business entity, any and all shares, interests, participations, rights or other equivalents (however designated) of corporate stock;
 
(3)in the case of a partnership or limited liability company, partnership interests (whether general or limited) or membership interests; and
 
(4)any other interest or participation that confers on a Person the right to receive a share of the profits and losses of, or distributions of assets of, the issuing Person (other than earn-outs or similar consideration payable in connection with an acquisition), but excluding from all of the foregoing any debt securities convertible into Capital Stock, whether or not such debt securities include any right of participation with Capital Stock.
 
“Cash Equivalents” means:
 
(1)United States dollars;

113
 
(2)(a) euro, or any national currency of any participating member state of the EMU; or (b) in the case of any Foreign Subsidiary that is a Restricted Subsidiary, such local currencies held by them from time to time in the ordinary course of business;
 
(3)
securities issued or directly and fully guaranteed or insured by the United States government or any agency or instrumentality of the United States government (provided that the full faith and credit of the United States is pledged in support of those securities) having maturities of not more than 24 months from the date of acquisition;
 
(4)certificates of deposit, time deposits and eurodollar time deposits with maturities of one year or less from the date of acquisition, bankers’ acceptances with maturities not exceeding one year and overnight bank deposits, in each case, with any lender party to the Senior Secured Credit Facility or with any domestic commercial bank having, at the time of the acquisition thereof, capital and surplus in excess of $500.0 million or any commercial bank of any foreign country having, at the time of acquisition thereof, capital and surplus in excess of $100.0 million (or the U.S. dollar equivalent thereof as of the date of determination);
 
(5)repurchase obligations for underlying securities of the types described in clauses (3) and (4) above entered into with any financial institution meeting the qualifications specified in clause (4) above;
 
(6)commercial paper having, at the time of acquisition, one of the two highest ratings obtainable from Moody’s or S&P and, in each case, maturing within 24 months after the date of acquisition;
 
(7)marketable short-term money market and similar securities having a rating of at least P-2 or A-2 from either Moody’s or S&P, respectively (or, if at any time neither Moody’s nor S&P shall be rating such obligations, an equivalent rating from another rating agency) and in each case maturing within 24 months after the date of acquisition;
 
(8)securities issued by any state of the United States of America or any political subdivision of any such state or any public instrumentality thereof maturing within one year from the date of acquisition thereof and at the time of acquisition thereof, having one of the two highest ratings obtainable from either Moody’s or S&P (for purposes of the this clause (8), variable rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates that are reset through an auction process that occurs no less frequently than once every 45 days shall be deemed to satisfy the foregoing maturity deadline, notwithstanding such bonds having a longer nominal maturity);
 
(9)investment or money market funds at least 95% of the assets of which constitute Cash Equivalents of the kinds described in clauses (1) through (8) of this definition;
 
107

(10)readily marketable direct obligations issued by any state, commonwealth or territory of the United States or any political subdivision or taxing authority thereof having an Investment Grade Rating from either Moody’s or S&P with maturities of 24 months or less from the date of acquisition;
 
(11)Indebtedness with a rating of “A” or higher from S&P or “A2” or higher from Moody’s with maturities of 24 months or less from the date of acquisition;
 
(12)Investments with average maturities of 12 months or less from the date of acquisition in money market funds rated AAA- (or the equivalent thereof) or better by S&P or Aaa3 (or the equivalent thereof) or better by Moody’s; and
 
(13)local currencies (or investments in local currencies having correlative attributes to the foregoing) held by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, from time to time in the ordinary course of business.
 
“Change of Control” means the occurrence of any of the following:
 
(1)the sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition (other than a Lien permitted by the Indenture or by way of merger or consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole to any “person” (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) other than a Principal or a Related Party of a Principal;
 
(2)the adoption of a plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of Aeroflex;
 
(3)the consummation of any transaction (including, without limitation, any merger or consolidation), the result of which is that any “person” (as defined above), other than the Principals and their Related Parties, becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the Voting Stock of Aeroflex, measured by voting power rather than number of shares; or

114
 
(4)after an initial public offering of Equity Interests of Aeroflex or any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex, the first day on which (i) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex are not Continuing Directors, and (ii) the Principals and their Related Parties and any limited partners of the equity sponsor do not, at such time, in the aggregate, (a) Beneficially Own, directly or indirectly, Voting Stock of Aeroflex representing more than 50% of the total voting power of the Voting Stock of Aeroflex or (b) have the right or ability by voting power, contract or otherwise to elect or designate a majority of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex.
 
“Change of Control Offer” has the meaning assigned to that term in the Indenture governing the Notes.
 
“Consolidated Cash Flow” means, with respect to any specified Person for any period, the Consolidated Net Income of such Person for such period plus, without duplication:
 
(1)
provision for taxes based on income or profit or capital, including, without limitation, state, local and franchise taxes (such as the Pennsylvania capital tax and the Texas margin tax) (or the non-U.S.-equivalent thereof) of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period (including, without limitation, tax expenses of Foreign Subsidiaries and foreign withholding taxes paid or accrued for such period), to the extent that such provision for taxes was deducted (and not added back) in computing such Consolidated Net Income; plus
 
(2)
the Fixed Charges of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period (plus any non-cash interest expense attributable to the movement in the mark to market valuation of Hedging Obligations or other derivative instruments pursuant to GAAP, amortization of deferred financing fees and any loss on early extinguishment of Indebtedness excluded from the definition of the term “Fixed Charges”), to the extent that such Fixed Charges were deducted (and not added back) in computing such Consolidated Net Income; plus
 
(3)
the total amount of depreciation and amortization expenses (including amortization of goodwill and other intangibles and deferred financing costs or fees, and all expenditures in respect of licensed or purchased software or internally-developed software and software enhancements that are, or are required to be reflected as, capitalized costs, but excluding amortization of prepaid cash expenses that were paid in a prior period) of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period to the extent that such depreciation and amortization were deducted (and not added back) in computing such Consolidated Net Income, plus
 
108

(4)
any management, monitoring, consulting and advisory fees (including termination fees) and related indemnities and expenses paid or accrued by Aeroflex and/or its Restricted Subsidiaries in such period pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement and payments made pursuant to clauses (7), (8) and (15) under the caption “—Transactions with Affiliates”; to the extent deducted in computing such Consolidated Net Income; plus
 
(5)
any other non-cash charges reducing Consolidated Cash Flow for such period (provided that if any such non-cash charges represent an accrual or reserve for potential cash items in any future period, the cash payment in respect thereof in such future period shall be subtracted from Consolidated Cash Flow to such extent, and excluding amortization of a prepaid cash item that was paid in a prior period); plus
 
(6)
any costs or expense incurred by Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to any management equity plan or stock option plan or any other management or employee benefit plan or agreement or any stock subscription or shareholder agreement, to the extent that such cost or expenses are funded with cash proceeds contributed to the capital of Aeroflex or net cash proceeds of an issuance of Equity Interests of Aeroflex (other than Disqualified Stock) solely to the extent that such net cash proceeds are excluded from clause 3(b) of the first paragraph, or clauses (2), (5) or (17) of the second paragraph, under “Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments”; plus
 
(7)
cash receipts (or any netting arrangements resulting in reduced cash expenditures) not representing Consolidated Cash Flow, Consolidated Net Income or Net Income in any period to the extent non-cash gains relating to such income were deducted in the calculation of Consolidated Cash Flow pursuant to (11) below for any previous period and not added back; plus
 
(8)
the amount of any minority interest expense consisting of income of a Restricted Subsidiary attributable to minority equity interests of third parties in any non-wholly owned Subsidiary deducted (and not added back) in such period in calculating Consolidated Net Income; plus

115
 
(9)
the amount of loss on sale of Receivables and Related Assets to the Receivables Entity in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction; minus
 
(10)non-cash gains increasing such Consolidated Net Income for such period, excluding any such items to the extent they represent (a) the reversal in such period of an accrual of, or reserve for, potential cash expenses in a prior period, (b) any non-cash gains with respect to cash actually received in a prior period to the extent such cash did not increase Consolidated Cash Flow in a prior period, (c) the amortization of income that was paid in a prior period and (d) the accrual of revenue or income consistent with past practice,
 
in each case, on a consolidated basis and determined in accordance with GAAP.
 
“Consolidated Net Income” means, with respect to any specified Person for any period, the aggregate of the Net Income of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, on a consolidated basis, determined in accordance with GAAP; provided that:
 
(1)the Net Income of any Person that is not a Restricted Subsidiary will be included only to the extent of the amount of dividends, distributions or other payments paid in cash (or to the extent converted into cash) to the specified Person or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Person, and, in the case of a net loss, only to the extent of any equity in the net loss of any such Person for such period to the extent Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex has funded such net loss in cash with respect to such period;
 
(2)
solely for the purposes of calculating Consolidated Net Income to determine the amount of Restricted Payments permitted under the covenant described under the caption “Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments”, the Net Income of any Restricted Subsidiary (other than a Guarantor) will be excluded to the extent that the declaration or payment of dividends or similar distributions by that Restricted Subsidiary of its Net Income is not at the date of determination permitted without any prior governmental approval (that has not been obtained) or, directly or indirectly, by operation of the terms of its charter or any agreement, instrument, judgment, decree, order, statute, rule or governmental regulation applicable to that Restricted Subsidiary or its stockholders (a) except to the extent that such net income is actually or permitted to be paid to Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex by loans, advances, intercompany transfers, principal repayments or otherwise, and (b) unless such restriction with respect to the payment of dividends or similar distributions has been legally waived; provided that Consolidated Net Income of Aeroflex will be increased by the amount of dividends or other distributions or other payments actually paid in cash (or to the extent converted into cash) to Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary thereof in respect of such period, to the extent not already included therein;
 
109

(3)the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles and changes as a result of the adoption or modification of accounting policies during such period will be excluded;
 
(4)any impairment charge or asset write-off or write-down, including impairment charges or asset write-offs or write-downs related to intangible assets, long-lived assets, investments in debt and equity securities or as a result of a change in law or regulation, in each case, pursuant to GAAP (including the amortization of the consideration for any non-competition agreements entered into in connection with the Transactions), shall be excluded;
 
(5)any net gain or loss from discontinued operations and any net after-tax gain or loss on disposal of discontinued operations shall be excluded;
 
(6)non-cash charges relating to employee benefit or other management compensation plans of any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex (to the extent such non-cash charges relate to plans of any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex for the benefit of members of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex (in their capacity as such) or employees of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries), Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or any non-cash compensation charge and other non-cash expenses or charges arising from any grant, issuance or repricing of stock appreciation or similar rights, stock, stock options, restricted stock or other equity-based awards of any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex (to the extent such non-cash charges relate to plans of any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex for the benefit of members of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex (in their capacity as such) or employees of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries), Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (excluding in each case any non-cash charge to the extent that it represents an accrual of or reserve for cash expenses in any future period or amortization of a prepaid cash expense incurred in a prior period) in each case will be excluded;

116
 
(7)effects of adjustments (including the effects of such adjustments pushed down to Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries) pursuant to GAAP resulting from the application of purchase accounting in relation to the Transaction or any consummated acquisition, net of taxes, shall be excluded;
 
(8)any net unrealized gain or loss (after any offset) resulting in such period from currency translation gains or losses including those related to currency remeasurements of Indebtedness will be excluded;
 
(9)any restoration to income of any contingency reserve, except to the extent that provision for such reserve was made out of Net Income accrued at any time following the date of the Indenture will be excluded;
 
(10)any fees, expenses, costs or charges (including all transaction, restructuring and transition costs, fees and expenses (including diligence costs and cash severance costs)) or any amortization thereof, related to any acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness (including any refinancing transaction or amendment or modification of any debt instrument), Equity Offering, issuance of or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or other specified action (in each case, including any such transaction consummated prior to the date of the Indenture and any such transaction undertaken but not completed), including (i) such fees, expenses or charges related to the offering of the Notes and the Credit Facilities and the Transactions and (ii) any amendment or other modification of the Notes and the Credit Facilities and, in each case, deducted (and not added back) in computing Net Income, will be excluded; and
 
(11)accruals and reserves that are established within twelve months after the date of the Indenture that are so required to be established as a result of the Transaction in accordance with GAAP shall be excluded.
 
In addition, to the extent not already included in the Consolidated Net Income of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, Consolidated Net Income shall include the amount of proceeds received from business interruption insurance and reimbursements of any expenses and charges that are covered by indemnification or other reimbursement provisions in connection with any Permitted Investment or any sale, conveyance, transfer or other disposition of assets permitted under the Indenture.
 
“Consolidated Secured Debt Ratio” as of any date of determination, means the ratio of (1) Consolidated Total Indebtedness of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries that is secured by Liens as of the end of the most recent fiscal period for which internal financial statements are available immediately preceding the date on which such event for which such calculation is being made shall occur to (2) Aeroflex’s Consolidated Cash Flow for Aeroflex’s most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available immediately preceding the date on which such event for which such calculation is being made shall occur, in each case with such pro forma adjustments to Consolidated Total Indebtedness and Consolidated Cash Flow as are appropriate and consistent with the pro forma adjustment provisions set forth in the definition of “Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio.”
 
110

“Consolidated Total Indebtedness” means, as at any date of determination, an amount equal to the sum of (1) the aggregate amount of all outstanding Indebtedness of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis consisting of Indebtedness for borrowed money, Obligations in respect of Capital Lease Obligations and debt obligations evidenced by promissory notes and similar instruments (and excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, all obligations relating to Receivables financings) and (2) the aggregate amount of all outstanding Disqualified Stock of Aeroflex and all preferred stock of its Restricted Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis (other than Disqualified Stock or preferred stock owned by Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex), with the amount of such Disqualified Stock and preferred stock equal to the greater of their respective voluntary or involuntary liquidation preferences and maximum fixed repurchase prices, in each case determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP. For purposes hereof, the “maximum fixed repurchase price” of any Disqualified Stock or preferred stock that does not have a fixed repurchase price shall be calculated in accordance with the terms of such Disqualified Stock or preferred stock as if such Disqualified Stock or preferred stock were purchased on any date on which Consolidated Total Indebtedness shall be required to be determined pursuant to the Indenture, and if such price is based upon, or measured by, the fair market value of such Disqualified Stock or preferred stock, such fair market value shall be determined reasonably and in good faith by Aeroflex.
 
“Contingent Obligations” means, with respect to any Person, any obligation of such Person guaranteeing any leases, dividends or other obligations that do not constitute Indebtedness (“primary obligations”) of any other Person (the “primary obligor”) in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, including, without limitation, any obligation of such Person, whether or not contingent,
 
(1)to purchase any such primary obligation or any property constituting direct or indirect security therefor,

117
 
(2)to advance or supply funds (a) for the purchase or payment of any such primary obligation or (b) to maintain working capital or equity capital of the primary obligor or otherwise to maintain the net worth or solvency of the primary obligor, or
 
(3)to purchase property, securities or services primarily for the purpose of assuring the owner of any such primary obligation of the ability of the primary obligor to make payment of such primary obligation against loss in respect thereof.
 
“Continuing Directors” means, as of any date of determination, any member of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex who:
 
(1)was a member of such Board of Directors on the date of the Indenture;
 
(2)was nominated for election or elected to such Board of Directors with the approval of a majority of the Continuing Directors who were members of such Board of Directors at the time of such nomination or election; or
 
(3)was nominated for election or elected to such Board of Directors with the approval of a Principal or a Related Party of a Principal.
 
“Credit Facilities” means, one or more debt facilities (including, without limitation, the Senior Secured Credit Facility), indentures, or commercial paper facilities, in each case, with banks or other lenders or a trustee providing for revolving credit loans, term loans, receivables financing and securitizations (including through the sale of receivables to such lenders or to special purpose entities formed to borrow from such lenders against such receivables) or letters of credit or issuance of notes, in each case, as amended, restated, modified, renewed, refunded, replaced (whether upon or after termination or otherwise), substituted or refinanced (including by means of sales of debt securities to institutional investors) in whole or in part from time to time.
 
“Default” means any event that is, or with the passage of time or the giving of notice or both would be, an Event of Default.
 
111

“Designated Noncash Consideration” means the Fair Market Value of noncash consideration received by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with an Asset Sale that is so designated as Designated Noncash Consideration pursuant to an Officers’ Certificate, setting for the basis of such valuation delivered to the trustee.
 
“Disqualified Stock” means any Capital Stock that, by its terms (or by the terms of any security into which it is convertible, or for which it is exchangeable, in each case, at the option of the holder of the Capital Stock), or upon the happening of any event, matures or is mandatorily redeemable, pursuant to a sinking fund obligation or otherwise, or redeemable at the option of the holder of the Capital Stock, in whole or in part, for cash, on or prior to the date that is 91 days after the date on which the Notes mature. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any Capital Stock that would constitute Disqualified Stock solely because the holders of the Capital Stock have the right to require Aeroflex to repurchase such Capital Stock upon the occurrence of a change of control or an asset sale will not constitute Disqualified Stock if the terms of such Capital Stock provide that Aeroflex may not repurchase or redeem any such Capital Stock pursuant to such provisions unless such repurchase or redemption complies with the covenant described above under the caption “—Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments.” The amount of Disqualified Stock deemed to be outstanding at any time for purposes of the Indenture will be the maximum amount that Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries may become obligated to pay upon the maturity of, or pursuant to any mandatory redemption provisions of, such Disqualified Stock, exclusive of accrued dividends.
 
“Domestic Subsidiary” means any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex that was formed under the laws of the United States or any state of the United States or the District of Columbia or that guarantees or otherwise provides direct credit support for any Indebtedness of Aeroflex.
 
“Equity Interests” means Capital Stock and all warrants, options or other rights to acquire Capital Stock (but excluding any debt security that is convertible into, or exchangeable for, Capital Stock).
 
“Equity Offering” means a public or private offering of Qualified Capital Stock of Aeroflex or a direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex, as the case may be.
 
“Excluded Contribution” means net cash proceeds, marketable securities or Qualified Proceeds received by Aeroflex after the date of the Indenture from:

118
 
(1)contributions to its common equity capital, and
 
(2)the sale (other than to a Subsidiary of Aeroflex or to any management equity plan or stock option plan or any other management or employee benefit plan or agreement of Aeroflex) of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of Aeroflex,
 
in each case designated as Excluded Contributions pursuant to an Officer’s Certificate executed by the principal financial officer of Aeroflex on the date such capital contributions are made or the date such Equity Interests are sold, as the case may be, which are excluded from the calculations set forth in (a) clause (3)(b) of the first paragraph, and clauses (2) and (17) of the third paragraph, of the covenant described under “Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments” and (b) clause (19) of the second paragraph of the covenant described under “Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock.”
 
“Existing Indebtedness” means all Indebtedness of Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries (other than (a) Indebtedness under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and (b) any Indebtedness incurred since September 21, 2007, pursuant to clauses (6), (16) or (24) of Section 6.1(b) of the Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility that has not been reclassified as having been incurred under another provision of Section 6.1 thereof) in existence on the date of the Indenture.
 
“Fair Market Value” means the value that would be paid by a willing buyer to an unaffiliated willing seller in a transaction not involving distress or necessity of either party, determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of Aeroflex (unless otherwise provided in the Indenture).
 
“First Priority Cash Management Obligations” means all obligations of Aeroflex and certain of its Subsidiaries in respect of overdrafts and related liabilities owed to any other Person that arise from treasury, depositary or cash management services, including in connection with any automated clearing house transfers of funds, or any similar transactions, secured by assets of Aeroflex and certain of its Subsidiaries under the documents that secure Obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, and any other Credit Facility.

 
112

“Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio” means, with respect to any specified Person for any period, the ratio of the Consolidated Cash Flow of such Person for such period to the Fixed Charges of such Person for such period. In the event that the specified Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries incurs, assumes, guarantees, repays, repurchases, redeems, defeases, retires, extinguishes or otherwise discharges any Indebtedness (other than working capital borrowings, unless such Indebtedness has been permanently repaid) or issues, repurchases, or redeems preferred stock or Disqualified Stock subsequent to the commencement of the period for which the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is being calculated and on or prior to the date on which the event for which the calculation of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is made (the “Calculation Date”), then the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio will be calculated giving pro forma effect to such incurrence, assumption, guarantee, repayment, repurchase, redemption, defeasance, retirement, extinguishment or other discharge of Indebtedness, or such issuance, repurchase or redemption of preferred stock, and the use of the proceeds therefrom, as if the same had occurred at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter reference period.
 
In addition, for purposes of calculating the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio:
 
(1)the Transactions, future acquisitions, Investments, dispositions, issuances, incurrences or repayments of Indebtedness, Equity Offerings, issuances or dispositions of Equity Interests, recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations, disposed or discontinued operations and other specified actions that have been made by the specified Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, including through mergers or consolidations, or any Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries acquired by the specified Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, and including any related financing transactions and including increases in ownership of Restricted Subsidiaries, during the four-quarter reference period or subsequent to such reference period and on or prior to the Calculation Date (including any transaction giving rise to the need to make such calculation) will be given pro forma effect (in accordance with Regulation S-X under the Securities Act), including Pro Forma Cost Savings (and the change in any associated fixed charge obligation and change in Consolidated Cash Flow resulting therefrom), whether or not such Pro Forma Cost Savings complies with Regulation S-X, as if they had occurred on the first day of the four-quarter reference period. If since the beginning of such period any Person (that subsequently became a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex or was merged with or into Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex since the beginning of such period) shall have made any acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness, Equity Offering, issuance or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or other specified action that would have required adjustment pursuant to this definition, then the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio shall be calculated giving pro forma effect thereto for such period as if such acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness, Equity Offering, issuance or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or other specified action had occurred at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter period;

119
 
(2)the Consolidated Cash Flow attributable to discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, and operations or businesses (and ownership interests therein) disposed of prior to the Calculation Date, will be excluded (including by adding back the amount of any attributable Consolidated Cash Flow that was negative);
 
(3)the Fixed Charges attributable to discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, and operations or businesses (and ownership interests therein) disposed of prior to the Calculation Date, will be excluded, but only to the extent that the obligations giving rise to such Fixed Charges will not be obligations of the specified Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries following the Calculation Date;
 
(4)any Person that is a Restricted Subsidiary on the Calculation Date will be deemed to have been a Restricted Subsidiary at all times during such four-quarter period;
 
(5)any Person that is not a Restricted Subsidiary on the Calculation Date will be deemed not to have been a Restricted Subsidiary at any time during such four-quarter period;
 
(6)if any Indebtedness bears a floating rate of interest, the interest expense on such Indebtedness will be calculated as if the rate in effect on the Calculation Date had been the applicable rate for the entire period (after giving effect to the operation of any Hedging Obligation applicable to such Indebtedness); and
 
(7)interest on any Indebtedness under a revolving credit facility shall be computed based upon the average daily balance of such Indebtedness during such period.
 
“Fixed Charges” means, with respect to any specified Person for any period, the sum, without duplication, of:

 
113

(1)
the consolidated interest expense of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period (net of any interest income of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period), to the extent such expense was deducted and not added back in computing Consolidated Net Income, including, without limitation, amortization of original issue discount, non-cash interest payments (but excluding any non-cash interest expense attributable to the movement in the mark to market valuation of Hedging Obligations or other derivative instruments pursuant to GAAP), the interest component of any deferred payment obligations, the interest component of all payments associated with Capital Lease Obligations, commissions, discounts and other fees and charges incurred in respect of letter of credit or bankers’ acceptance financings, and net of all payments made or received pursuant to Hedging Obligations (but excluding amortization of deferred financing fees and any loss on early extinguishment of Indebtedness and, in calculating Fixed Charges for the purposes of determining the denominator of Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio only, excluding (i) the accretion of any original issue discount or any non-cash interest expense resulting from the discounting of any Indebtedness resulting from fair value adjustments resulting from purchase accounting, (ii) any financing fees, tender premiums, call premiums and other non-recurring expenses, whether or not capitalized, in connection with the Transactions and Indebtedness that is retired with the proceeds of the Notes issued on the date of the Indenture, (iii) penalties and interest relating to taxes, (iv) any expensing of bridge, commitment and other financing fees and (v) commissions, discounts, yield and other fees and charges (including any interest expense) related to any Qualified Receivables Transaction); plus
 
(2)
any interest on Indebtedness of another Person that is guaranteed by such Person or one of its Restricted Subsidiaries or secured by a Lien on assets of such Person or one of its Restricted Subsidiaries, whether or not such Guarantee or Lien is called upon; plus
 
(3)
the consolidated interest expense of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries that was capitalized during such period; plus
 
(4)the product of (a) all cash dividends or other similar distributions paid (excluding items eliminated in consolidation) on any series of preferred stock of such Person or any preferred stock of any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, other than dividends on Equity Interests payable solely in Equity Interests of Aeroflex (other than Disqualified Stock) or to Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex, times (b) a fraction, the numerator of which is one and the denominator of which is one minus the then current combined federal, state and local statutory tax rate of such Person, expressed as a decimal,
in each case, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of this definition, interest on a Capitalized Lease Obligation shall be deemed to accrue at an interest rate reasonably determined by such Person to be the rate of interest implicit in such Capitalized Lease Obligation in accordance with GAAP.

120
 
“Foreign Subsidiary” means any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex that is not a Domestic Subsidiary.
 
“GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles set forth in the opinions and pronouncements of the Accounting Principles Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and statements and pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board or in such other statements by such other entity as have been approved by a significant segment of the accounting profession or in the rules and regulations of the SEC governing the inclusion of financial statements (including pro forma financial statements) in periodic reports required to be filed pursuant to Section 13 of the Exchange Act, including opinions and pronouncements in staff accounting bulletins and similar written statements from the accounting staff of the SEC, in effect on the date of the Indenture; provided that any reports required to be delivered under the covenant described under “—Reports” shall be prepared in accordance with GAAP in effect on the date thereof.
 
“Guarantee” means a guarantee other than by endorsement of negotiable instruments for collection in the ordinary course of business, direct or indirect, in any manner including, without limitation, by way of a pledge of assets or through letters of credit or reimbursement agreements in respect thereof, of all or any part of any Indebtedness (whether arising by virtue of agreements to keep-well, to purchase assets, goods, securities or services, to take or pay or to maintain financial statement conditions or otherwise).
 
“Guarantors” means:
 
(1)each Domestic Subsidiary of Aeroflex as of the date of this prospectus; and
 
114

(2)each other Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex that executes a Note Guarantee in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture, and their respective successors and assigns, in each case, until the Note Guarantee of such Person has been released in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture.
 
“Hedging Obligations” means, with respect to any specified Person, the obligations of such Person under:
 
(1)interest rate swap agreements (whether from fixed to floating or from floating to fixed), interest rate cap agreements, interest rate collar agreements and other agreements or arrangements designed for the purpose of fixing, hedging or swapping interest rate risk and other agreements or arrangements designed to manage interest rates or interest rate risk;
 
(2)commodity swap agreements, commodity option agreements, forward contracts and other agreements or arrangements designed for the purpose of fixing, hedging or swapping commodity price risk; and
 
(3)foreign exchange contracts, currency swap agreements and other agreements or arrangements designed for the purpose of fixing, hedging or swapping foreign currency exchange rate risk.
 
 
“Holder” means a Person in whose name a Note is registered.
 
“Indebtedness” means, with respect to any specified Person, any indebtedness of such Person (excluding accrued expenses and trade payables), whether or not contingent:
 
(1)in respect of borrowed money;
 
(2)evidenced by bonds, notes, debentures or similar instruments or letters of credit (or reimbursement agreements in respect thereof) (other than letters of credit issued in respect of trade payables entered into in the ordinary course, to the extent such Obligations are cash collateralized or such letters of credit secure Obligations entered into in the normal course of business of such Person and such letters of credit are not drawn upon or, if drawn upon, to the extent any such drawing is reimbursed no later than three business days following receipt by such Person of a demand for reimbursement);
 
(3)in respect of banker’s acceptances;
 
(4)representing Capital Lease Obligations;

121
 
(5)representing the balance deferred and unpaid of the purchase price of any property or services due, other than any such balance that constitutes an accrued expense or trade payable or other expense incurred in the ordinary course of business (including, without limitation, obligations owing to customers and suppliers); or
 
(6)representing any interest rate Hedging Obligations,
 
if and to the extent any of the preceding items (other than letters of credit and Hedging Obligations) would appear as a liability upon a balance sheet of the specified Person prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the term “Indebtedness” includes all Indebtedness of others secured by a Lien on any asset of the specified Person (whether or not such Indebtedness is assumed by the specified Person) and, to the extent not otherwise included, the Guarantee by the specified Person of any Indebtedness of any other Person.
 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with the purchase by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of any business, assets or Capital Stock not in the ordinary course of business, the term “Indebtedness” will exclude (i) Contingent Obligations in the ordinary course of business, (ii) obligations in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction and (iii) post-closing payment adjustments to which the seller may become entitled to the extent such payment is determined by a final closing balance sheet or such payment depends on the performance of such business after the closing; provided, however, that at the time of closing, the amount of any such payment is not determinable and, to the extent such payment thereafter becomes fixed, determined and undisputed the amount is paid within 60 days thereafter.
 
“Investment Grade Rating” means a rating equal to or higher than Baa3 (or the equivalent) by Moody’s and BBB- (or the equivalent) by S&P, or an equivalent rating by any other rating agency.

 
115

“Investments” means, with respect to any Person, all direct or indirect investments by such Person in other Persons (including Affiliates) in the forms of loans (including Guarantees of Indebtedness), advances or capital contributions (excluding (i) commission, travel and similar advances to officers and employees made in the ordinary course of business and (ii) extensions of credit to customers or advances, deposits or payments to or with suppliers, lessors or utilities or for workers’ compensation, in each case, that are incurred in the ordinary course of business and recorded as accounts receivable, prepaid expenses or deposits on the balance sheet of such Person prepared in accordance with GAAP), purchases or other acquisitions for consideration of Indebtedness, Equity Interests or other securities, together with all items that are or would be classified as investments on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP. If Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex sells or otherwise disposes of any Equity Interests of any direct or indirect Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex such that, after giving effect to any such sale or disposition, such Person is no longer a Subsidiary of Aeroflex, Aeroflex will be deemed to have made an Investment on the date of any such sale or disposition equal to the Fair Market Value of Aeroflex’s Investments in such Subsidiary that were not sold or disposed of in an amount determined as provided in the final paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption “—Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments.” Except as otherwise provided in the Indenture, the amount of an Investment will be determined at the time the Investment is made and without giving effect to subsequent changes in value.
 
“Lien” means, with respect to any asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest or encumbrance of any kind in respect of such asset, whether or not filed, recorded or otherwise perfected under applicable law, including any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, any lease in the nature thereof, any option or other agreement to sell or give a security interest in such asset; provided that in no event shall an operating lease be deemed to constitute a Lien.
 
“Management Agreement” means that certain management agreement dated August 15, 2007, among Aeroflex, VGG Holding LLC, AX Holding Corp., Veritas Capital Fund Management, L.L.C., GGC Administration, LLC and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as amended.
 
“Moody’s” means Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
 
“Net Income” means, with respect to any specified Person, the net income (or loss) of such Person, determined in accordance with GAAP and before any reduction in respect of preferred stock dividends, excluding, however:
 
(1)any gain (or loss), together with any related provision for taxes on such gain (or loss), realized in connection with: (a) any Asset Sale (without giving effect to the $2.5 million threshold provided in the definition thereof) or other asset disposition or abandonment (other than in the ordinary course of business) and reserves relating thereto; or (b) the disposition of any securities by such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or the extinguishment of any (i) Indebtedness or (ii) other derivative instruments of such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in each case, together with any related provisions for taxes on such gains and losses;

122
 
(2)any extraordinary, non-recurring or unusual gain (or loss) or expense, (including relating to the Transactions, acquisitions, restructurings or any multi-year strategic initiatives), including, without limitation, the amount of any restructuring charges, integration costs, or other business optimization costs and expenses (including related to the closure and/or consolidation of facilities and/or reductions in headcount, severance, relocation costs and curtailments or modifications to pension and post-retirement employee benefit plans and other non-recurring payments to employees related to severance, 280G, supplemental employee retirement plan, deferred compensation, consulting, acceleration of payments of other employment related benefits or other payments related to the termination, whether for cause or not, or retirement or made to former employees or the termination of an employee agreement, retention bonuses and litigation settlements or losses), or reserves deducted, in each case, together with any related provision for taxes on such extraordinary, non-recurring or unusual gain (or loss) or expense; and
 
(3)any net unrealized gain or loss (after any offset) resulting in such period from Hedging Obligations or other derivative instruments and the application of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133.
 
“Net Proceeds” means the aggregate cash proceeds received by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in respect of any Asset Sale (including, without limitation, any cash received upon the sale or other disposition of any non-cash consideration, including Designated Noncash Consideration, received in any Asset Sale), net of the direct costs relating to such Asset Sale or disposition of such non-cash consideration, including, without limitation, legal, accounting and investment banking fees, appraisal and insurance adjuster fees and sales commissions, and any severance or relocation expenses incurred as a result of the Asset Sale, taxes paid or payable as a result of the Asset Sale, in each case, after taking into account without duplication, (1) any amounts required to be applied to the repayment of Indebtedness secured by a Lien on the assets that were the subject of such Asset Sale, (2) appropriate amounts to be maintained as a reserve for payment with respect to liabilities associated with such asset or assets and retained by Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary after such sale or other disposition thereof, including, without limitation, severance costs, pension and other post-employment benefit liabilities and liabilities related to environmental matters or against any indemnification obligations associated with such transaction, (3) any reserves for adjustment in respect of the sale price of such asset, (4) amounts required to be paid to any Person (other than Aeroflex or its Restricted Subsidiaries) owning a beneficial interest in the assets that are the subject of such transaction, and (5) any cash escrows in connection with purchase price adjustments, reserves or indemnities (until released).

 
116

“Non-Recourse Debt” means Indebtedness:
 
(1)as to which neither Aeroflex nor any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (a) provides credit support of any kind (including any undertaking, agreement or instrument that would constitute Indebtedness), (b) is directly or indirectly liable as a guarantor or otherwise, or (c) constitutes the lender;
 
(2)no default with respect to which (including any rights that the holders of the Indebtedness may have to take enforcement action against an Unrestricted Subsidiary) would permit upon notice, lapse of time or both any holder of any other Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to declare a default on such other Indebtedness or cause the payment of the Indebtedness to be accelerated or payable prior to its Stated Maturity; and
 
(3)as to which (a) the explicit terms provide that there is no recourse against any assets of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or (b) the lenders have been notified in writing that they will not have any recourse to the stock or assets of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries.
 
“Note Guarantee” means the Guarantee by each Guarantor of Aeroflex’s obligations under the Indenture and the Notes, executed pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture.
 
“Obligations” means any principal (including reimbursement obligations with respect to letters of credit whether or not drawn), interest (including all interest accrued thereon after the commencement of any insolvency or liquidation proceeding at the rate, including any applicable post-default rate, specified in the documents governing any such Indebtedness, even if such interest is not enforceable, allowable or allowed as a claim in such proceeding), premium (if any), penalties, fees, indemnifications, reimbursements, expenses, damages and other amounts, obligations and liabilities payable under the documentation governing any Indebtedness.
 
“Officers’ Certificate” means a certificate signed on behalf of Aeroflex by two officers of Aeroflex, one of whom must be the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the treasurer or the principal accounting officer of Aeroflex, that meets the requirements of the Indenture.

123
 
“Permitted Business” means any business engaged in by Aeroflex or any of its Subsidiaries on the date of the original issuance of the Notes and any business or other activities that are reasonably similar, ancillary, complementary or related to, or a reasonable extension, development or expansion of, the businesses in which Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries are engaged on the date of original issuance of the Notes.
 
“Permitted Debt” has the meaning assigned to that term in the second paragraph of the covenant described under the caption “- Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock”.
 
“Permitted Investments” means:
 
(1)any Investment in Aeroflex or in a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex;
 
(2)any Investment in Cash Equivalents;
 
(3)any Investment by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex in a Person, if as a result of such Investment:
 
 (a)such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex; or
 
 (b)such Person, in one transaction, or a series of related transactions, is merged, consolidated or amalgamated with or into, or transfers or conveys substantially all of its assets to, or is liquidated into, Aeroflex or a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex;

117

and, in each case, any Investment held by such Person; provided that such Investments were not acquired in contemplation of such merger, consolidation or transfer;
 
(4)any Investment made as a result of the receipt of non-cash consideration from (a) an Asset Sale that was made pursuant to and in compliance with the covenant described above under the caption “—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sale” or (b) a sale or other disposition of assets not constituting an Asset Sale;
 
(5)any acquisition of assets or Capital Stock solely in exchange for the issuance of Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock) of Aeroflex or a direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex;
 
(6)any Investment acquired by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries:
 
 (a)in exchange for any other Investment or accounts receivable or claim held by Aeroflex or any such Restricted Subsidiary in connection with or as a result of a bankruptcy, workout, reorganization or recapitalization of a Person or the good faith settlement of delinquent obligations of a Person or of a litigation, arbitration or other dispute, or
 
 (b)as a result of a foreclosure by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries with respect to any secured Investment or other transfer of title with respect to any secured Investment in default;
 
(7)Investments represented by Hedging Obligations;
 
(8)loans, Guarantees of loans, advances, and other extensions of credit to or on behalf of current and former officers, directors, employees, and consultants of Aeroflex, a Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex, or a direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex made in the ordinary course of business or for the purpose of permitting such Persons to purchase Capital Stock of Aeroflex or any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex or in connection with any relocation costs related to the relocation of the corporate headquarters of Aeroflex, in an amount not to exceed $2.0 million at any one time outstanding;
 
(9)repurchases of the Notes;
 
(10)any Investment of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries existing on the date of the Indenture and any extension, modification or renewal of such existing Investments, to the extent not involving any additional Investment other than as the result of the accrual or accretion of interest or original issue discount or the issuance of pay-in-kind securities, in each case pursuant to the terms of such Investments as in effect on the date of the Indenture;
 
(11)Guarantees otherwise permitted by the terms of the Indenture;

124
 
(12)Investments resulting from the acquisition of a Person, otherwise permitted by the Indenture, which Investments at the time of such acquisition were held by the acquired Person and were not acquired in contemplation of the acquisition of such Person;
 
(13)Investments in joint ventures engaged in a Permitted Business having an aggregate value (measured on the date such Investment was made and without giving effect to subsequent changes in value), when taken together with all other Investments made pursuant to this clause (13) since the date of the Indenture not to exceed $25.0 million;
 
(14)Investments consisting of the licensing or contribution of intellectual property pursuant to joint marketing arrangements with other Persons;
 
(15)Investments in Unrestricted Subsidiaries in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5.0 million measured at the time of such Investment;
 
(16)advances to suppliers and customers in the ordinary course of business;
 
(17)receivables owing to Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary, prepaid expenses and deposits, if created, acquired or entered into in the ordinary course of business;
 
118

(18)payroll, business-related travel, and similar advances to cover matters that are expected at the time of such advances to be ultimately treated as expenses for accounting purposes and that are made in the ordinary course of business;
 
(19)any Investment in a Receivables Entity or any Investment by a Receivables Entity in any other Person in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction, including, without limitation, Investments of funds held in accounts permitted or required by the arrangements governing the Qualified Receivables Transaction or any related Indebtedness;
 
(20)other Investments in any Person other than an Affiliate of Aeroflex made since the date of the Indenture having an aggregate Fair Market Value (measured on the date each such Investment was made and without giving effect to subsequent changes in value), when taken together with all other Investments made pursuant to this clause (20) that are at such time outstanding not to exceed the greater of $25.0 million and 1.5% of Total Assets; and
 
(21)Investments in deposit accounts.
 
“Permitted Liens” means:
 
(1)
Liens on assets of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries securing Indebtedness that was permitted to be incurred pursuant to clauses (1), (4), (9), (10), (16), (20), (21) and (22) of the second paragraph of the covenant described under “Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock”; provided, in the case of clause (9), that the Indebtedness being guaranteed was permitted to be secured by a Lien;
 
(2)Liens in favor of Aeroflex or the Guarantors;
 
(3)
Liens on property of a Person existing at the time such Person is merged with or into or consolidated with Aeroflex or any Subsidiary of Aeroflex; provided that such Liens were in existence prior to and were not incurred in connection with or in the contemplation of such merger or consolidation and do not extend to any assets other than those of the Person merged into or consolidated with Aeroflex or the Subsidiary and assets or property affixed or appurtenant thereto;
 
(4)
Liens on property (including Capital Stock) existing at the time of acquisition of the property by Aeroflex or any Subsidiary of Aeroflex and assets or property affixed or appurtenant thereto; provided that such Liens were in existence prior to, such acquisition, and not incurred in contemplation of, such acquisition;
 
(5)Liens to secure the performance of tenders, completion guarantees, statutory obligations, surety or appeal bonds, bids, leases, government contracts, performance bonds or other obligations of a like nature incurred in the ordinary course of business;
 
(6)Liens existing on the date of the Indenture;

125
 
(7)
Liens for taxes, assessments or governmental charges or claims that are not yet delinquent or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings promptly instituted and diligently concluded; provided that any reserve or other appropriate provision as is required in conformity with GAAP has been made therefor;
 
(8)Liens imposed by law, such as carriers’ warehousemen’s, landlords’, mechanics’, suppliers, materialmen’s and repairmen’s Liens, or in favor of customs or revenue authorities or freight forwarders or handlers to secure payment of custom duties, in each case, incurred in the ordinary course of business;
 
(9)survey exceptions (or any state of facts an accurate survey would disclose), easements or reservations of, or rights of others for or pursuant to any leases, licenses, rights-of-way, or other similar agreements or arrangements, development, air or water rights, sewers, electric lines, telegraph and telephone lines and other utility lines, pipelines, service lines, railroad lines, improvements and structures located on, over or under any property, drains, drainage ditches, culverts, electric power or gas generating or co-generation, storage and transmission facilities and other similar purposes, or zoning or other restrictions as to the use of real property or minor defects in title which were not incurred to secure the payment of Indebtedness and that do not in the aggregate materially adversely affect the value of said properties or materially impair their use in the operation of the business of such Person;
 
(10)Liens created for the benefit of (or to secure) the Notes (or the Note Guarantees) and all other monetary obligations under the Indenture;
 
119

(11)
Liens to secure any Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness permitted to be incurred under the Indenture; provided, however, that the new Lien shall be limited to all or part of the same property and assets that secured or, under the written agreements pursuant to which the Indebtedness being refinanced arose, could secure the original Lien (plus improvements and accessions to, such property or proceeds or distributions thereof);
 
(12)Liens incurred by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex with respect to Obligations that do not exceed, at any one time outstanding, the sum of (a) $20.0 million, plus (b) if, at the time of incurrence and after giving pro forma effect thereto, the Consolidated Secured Debt Ratio would be no greater than 3.0 to 1.0, an additional $20.0 million; in each case, measured at the time of incurrence thereof;
 
(13)Liens upon specific items of inventory or other goods and proceeds of any Person securing such Person’s obligations in respect of bankers’ acceptances issued or created for the account of such Person to facilitate the purchase, shipment or storage of such inventory or other goods;
 
(14)Liens incurred or pledges or deposits made in the ordinary course of business in connection with workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance and other types of social security and employee health and disability benefits, or casualty or liability insurance or self insurance including any Lien securing letters of credit issued in the ordinary course of business in connection therewith;
 
(15)
judgment and attachment Liens not giving rise to an Event of Default and notices of lis pendens and associated rights related to litigation being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves have been made in conformity with GAAP;
 
(16)Liens securing Hedging Obligations incurred pursuant to clause (8) of the definition of “Permitted Debt;”
 
(17)
any extension, renewal or replacement, in whole or in part, of any Lien described in clauses (3), (4), (6), (18), (19) or (20) of this definition” provided that any such extension, renewal or replacement is no more restrictive taken as a whole than the Lien so extended, renewed or replaced and does not extend to any additional property or assets, in conformity with GAAP;
 
(18)any interest or title of a lessor, licensor or sublicense under any operating lease, license or sublicense, as applicable (including, without limitation, precautionary financing statements filed in connection therewith) and leases, subleases and licenses granted to others that do not interfere in any material respect with the business of such Person;
 
(19)Liens in favor of collecting or payor banks having a right of setoff, revocation, refund or chargeback with respect to money or instruments of Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary thereof on deposit with or in possession of such bank;
 
(20)Liens on assets of Foreign Subsidiaries securing Indebtedness incurred in accordance with the covenant described under the caption “—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock”;

126
 
(21)Liens on Receivables and Related Assets of the type specified in the definition of “Qualified Receivables Transaction” to secure Indebtedness incurred and outstanding under clause (1)(b) of the definition of “Permitted Debt”;
 
(22)Liens securing First Priority Cash Management Obligations;
 
(23)Liens on Equity Interests in Unrestricted Subsidiaries;
 
(24)Liens of a collection bank arising under Section 4-210 of the Uniform Commercial Code on items in the course of collection;
 
(25)Liens encumbering reasonable customary initial deposits and margin deposits and similar Liens attaching to commodity trading accounts or other brokerage accounts incurred in the ordinary course of business and not for speculative purposes; and
 
120

(26)Liens that are contractual rights of set-off (i) relating to the establishment of depository relations with banks not given in connection with the issuance of Indebtedness, (ii) relating to pooled deposit or sweep accounts of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to permit satisfaction of overdraft or similar obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries, or (iii) relating to purchase order and other agreements entered into by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex in the ordinary course of business.
 
“Permitted Payments to Parent” means, without duplication as to amounts:
 
(1)payments to any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex to permit such direct or indirect parent to pay directors’ fees, reasonable accounting, legal and administrative expenses of such Person when due; and
 
(2)
for so long as Aeroflex is a member of a group filing a consolidated or combined tax return with any direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex, payments to such direct or indirect parent in respect of an allocable portion of the tax liabilities of such group that is attributable to Aeroflex and its Subsidiaries (“Tax Payments”) and to pay franchise or similar taxes and fees of such direct or indirect parent required to maintain such direct or indirect parent’s corporate existence; provided that the amount of the Tax Payments shall not exceed the lesser of (in each case, as estimated in good faith by Aeroflex) (i) the amount of the relevant tax (including any penalties and interest) that Aeroflex would owe if Aeroflex were filing a separate tax return (or a separate consolidated or combined return with its Subsidiaries that are members of the consolidated or combined group), taking into account any carryovers and carrybacks of tax attributes (such as net operating losses) of Aeroflex and such Subsidiaries from other taxable years and (ii) the net amount of the relevant tax that direct or indirect parent actually owes to the appropriate taxing authority;
 
(3)customary salary, bonus, severance, indemnification obligations and other benefits payable to officers and employees of such direct or indirect parent corporation of Aeroflex to the extent such salaries, bonuses, severance, indemnification obligations and other benefits are attributable to the ownership or operation of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries;
 
(4)general corporate overhead and operating expenses for such direct or indirect parent corporation of Aeroflex to the extent such expenses are attributable to the ownership or operation of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries;
 
(5)reasonable fees and expenses incurred in connection with any unsuccessful debt or equity offering or other financing transaction by such direct or indirect parent of Aeroflex; and
 
(6)obligations under the Management Agreement.
 
“Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness” means
 
(1)
any Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries issued in exchange for, or the net proceeds of which are used to extend, redeem, renew, refund, refinance, replace, defease or discharge other Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than intercompany Indebtedness); provided that:
 
 (a)the principal amount (or accreted value, if applicable) of such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness does not exceed the principal amount (or accreted value, if applicable) of the Indebtedness extended, redeemed, renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged (plus all accrued interest on the Indebtedness and the amount of all fees and expenses, including the amount of any reasonably determined premium and defeasance costs, incurred in connection therewith and other amounts necessary to accomplish such refinancing);

127
 
 (b)such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness has a final maturity date no earlier than the final maturity date of, and has a Weighted Average Life to Maturity equal to or greater than the Weighted Average Life to Maturity of, the Indebtedness being extended, redeemed, renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged;
 
 (c)if the Indebtedness being extended, redeemed, renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged is subordinated in right of payment to the Notes, such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is subordinated in right of payment to, the Notes on terms not materially less favorable to the Holders of Notes as those contained in the documentation governing the Indebtedness being renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged; and
 
 (d)such Indebtedness is incurred either by Aeroflex or by the Restricted Subsidiary who is the obligor on the Indebtedness being extended, redeemed, renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged, unless the Indebtedness relates to a specific asset, in which case the obligor shall be the current owner of such asset; and
 
121

(2)
any Disqualified Stock of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries issued in exchange for, or the net proceeds of which are used to extend, refinance, renew, refund, replace, defease or discharge other Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock held by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries including intercompany Indebtedness); provided that:
 
 (a)the liquidation or face value of such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness does not exceed the principal amount (or accreted value, if applicable) of the Indebtedness, or the liquidation or face value of the Disqualified Stock, as applicable, so renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged (plus all accrued interest or dividends thereon and the amount of any reasonably determined premium incurred in connection therewith);
 
 (b)such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness has a final redemption date equal to or later than the final maturity or redemption date of, and has a Weighted Average Life to Maturity equal to or greater than the Weighted Average Life to Maturity of, the Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock being renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged;
 
 (c)such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is subordinated in right of payment to the Notes on terms not materially less favorable to the Holders of Notes as those contained in the documentation governing the Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock being renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged; and
 
 (d)such Disqualified Stock is issued either by Aeroflex or by the Restricted Subsidiary who is the issuer of the Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock being renewed, refunded, refinanced, replaced, defeased or discharged.
 
“Person” means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, limited liability company or government or other entity.
 
“Principals” means (i) The Veritas Capital Fund III, L.P., Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc. and GS Direct, L.L.C, their respective Affiliates, any fund or account managed by any of the foregoing or any Affiliate thereof, (ii) any entity controlled directly or indirectly by any one or more of the foregoing or any group described in clause (iii), or (iii) any “group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or Section 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) of which any of the foregoing are members; provided that, in the case of such group and without giving effect to the existence of such group or any other group, such Principals, collectively, have beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the Voting Stock of Aeroflex, measured by voting power rather than number of shares.

 
128

“Pro Forma Cost Savings” means, with respect to any period, the reduction in net costs and related adjustments that (i) were directly attributable to an acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness, Equity Offering, issuance of or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or other specified action that occurred during the four quarter period or after the end of the four quarter period and on or prior to the Calculation Date and calculated on a basis that is consistent with Regulation S-X under the Securities Act as in effect and applied as of the date of the Indenture, (ii) were actually implemented in connection with such acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness, Equity Offering, issuance of or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or specified action, and prior to the Calculation Date that are supportable and quantifiable by the underlying accounting records or (iii) relate to such acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness, Equity Offering, issuance of or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or other specified action and that Aeroflex reasonably determines are probable based upon specifically identifiable actions to be taken within 18 months of the date of the acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness, Equity Offering, issuance of or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or specified action; provided that the aggregate amount of cost savings added pursuant to this definition shall not exceed with respect to any other acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness, Equity Offering, issuance of or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or specified action, an aggregate amount equal to $20.0 million during each twelve month period following September 21, 2007 (provided no amounts shall be carried forward to any succeeding twelve month period), which allocated amount shall be reduced each Fiscal Quarter following the date of such acquisition, Investment, disposition, issuance, incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness, Equity Offering, issuance of or disposition of Equity Interests, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, disposed or discontinued operation or specified action by twenty-five percent (25%) of such initial allocated amount with calculations certified by the chief financial officer of Aeroflex.

 
122

“Qualified Capital Stock” means any Capital Stock that is not Disqualified Stock.
 
“Qualified Proceeds” means any of the following or any combination of the following:
 
(1)Cash Equivalents; and
 
(2)the Fair Market Value of assets that are used or useful in the Permitted Business; and
 
(3)the Fair Market Value of the Capital Stock of any Person engaged primarily in a Permitted Business if, in connection with the receipt by Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of such Capital Stock, such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary or such Person is merged or consolidated into Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary.
 
The Fair Market Value of any assets or Capital Stock that are required to be valued by this definition will be determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of Aeroflex whose resolution with respect thereto will be delivered to the Trustee. The Aeroflex Board of Directors’ determination must be based upon an opinion or appraisal issued by an accounting, appraisal or investment banking firm of national standing if the Fair Market Value exceeds $25.0 million.
 
“Qualified Receivables Transaction” means any transaction or series of transactions that may be entered into by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex pursuant to which Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries may sell, convey, contribute to capital or otherwise transfer to a Receivables Entity, or may grant a security interest in or pledge, any Receivables or interests therein and any assets related thereto, including, without limitation, all collateral securing such Receivables, all contracts and contract rights, purchase orders, security interests, financing statements or other documentation in respect of such Receivables, any Guarantees, indemnities, warranties or other documentation in respect of such Receivables, any other assets that are customarily transferred or in respect of which security interests are customarily granted in connection with asset securitization transactions involving receivables similar to such Receivables and any collections or proceeds of any of the foregoing (collectively, the “Related Assets”), which transfer, grant of security interest or pledge is funded in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, by the incurrence or issuance by the transferee or any successor transferee of Indebtedness, fractional undivided interests, or other securities that are to receive payments from, or that represent interests in, the cash flow derived from such Receivables and Related Assets or interests in Receivables and Related Assets, it being understood that a Qualified Receivables Transaction may involve:
 
(1)one or more sequential transfers or pledges of the same Receivables and Related Assets, or interests therein, and
 
(2)periodic transfers or pledges of Receivables or revolving transactions in which new Receivables and Related Assets, or interests therein, are transferred or pledged upon collection of previously transferred or pledged Receivables and Related Assets, or interests therein, and provided that:
 
 (A)the Board of Directors of Aeroflex or of any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex which is party to such Qualified Receivables Transaction shall have determined in good faith that such Qualified Receivables Transaction is economically fair and reasonable to Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex as applicable, and the Receivables Entity, and

129
 
 (B)the financing terms, covenants, termination events and other provisions thereof shall be market terms (as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of Aeroflex or of any Restricted Subsidiary which is party to such Qualified Receivables Transaction).
 
The grant of a security interest in any accounts receivables of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to secure Indebtedness incurred pursuant to the Senior Secured Credit Facility shall not be deemed a Qualified Receivables Transaction.
 
“Receivables” means accounts receivable (including all rights to payment created by or arising from the sale of goods, or the rendition of services, no matter how evidenced (including in the form of chattel paper) and whether or not earned by performance) of Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex, whether now existing or arising in the future.

 
123

“Receivables Entity” means any Person formed for the purposes of engaging in a Qualified Receivables Transaction with Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries which engages in no activities other than in connection with the financing of Receivables of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries, all proceeds thereof and all rights (contractual or other), collateral and other assets relating thereto, and any business or activities incidental or related to such business, and which is designated by the Board of Directors of the Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex that is the direct parent company of such Receivables Entity, or, if the Receivables Entity is not a Subsidiary of Aeroflex, by the Board of Directors of any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex participating in such Qualified Receivables Transaction (in each case as provided below), as a Receivables Entity and:
 
(1)no portion of the Indebtedness or any other obligations (contingent or otherwise) of which:
 
 (a)is guaranteed by Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex other than a Receivables Entity (excluding any guarantees (other than guarantees of the principal of, and interest on, Indebtedness and guarantees of collection on Receivables) pursuant to Standard Securitization Undertakings);
 
 (b)is recourse to or obligates Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex (other than a Receivables Entity) in any way other than pursuant to Standard Securitization Undertakings; or
 
 (c)subjects any property or asset of Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex other than a Receivables Entity, directly or indirectly, contingently or otherwise, to the satisfaction thereof, other than pursuant to Standard Securitization Undertakings;
 
(2)with which neither Aeroflex nor any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex other than a Receivables Entity has any material contract, agreement, arrangement or understanding other than on terms which Aeroflex reasonably believes to be no less favorable to Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary than those that might be obtained at that time from Persons that are not Affiliates of Aeroflex; and
 
(3)to which neither Aeroflex nor any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex has any obligation to maintain or preserve such entity’s financial condition or cause such entity to achieve certain levels of operating results (other than pursuant to Standard Securitization Undertakings).
 
Any such designation by the Board of Directors of the applicable Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex shall be evidenced to the Trustee by filing with the Trustee a certified copy of the resolution of such Board of Directors giving effect to such designation and an Officer’s Certificate certifying that such designation complied with the foregoing conditions.
 
“Receivables Financing” means any transaction (including, without limitation, any Qualified Receivables Transaction) pursuant to which Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex may sell, convey or otherwise transfer or grant a security interest in any Receivables or Related Assets of the type specified in the definition of “Qualified Receivables Transaction.”
 
“Related Assets” shall have the meaning assigned to that term in the definition of “Qualified Receivables Transaction”.
 
“Related Party” means:

130
 
(1)any controlling stockholder, partners, member, 80% (or more) owned Subsidiary, or immediate family member (in the case of an individual) of any Principal; or
 
(2)any trust, corporation, partnership, limited liability company or other entity, the beneficiaries, stockholders, partners, members, owners or Persons beneficially holding an 80% or more controlling interest of which consist of any one or more Principals and/or such other Persons referred to in the immediately preceding clause (1).
 
“Restricted Investment” means an Investment other than a Permitted Investment.
 
“Restricted Subsidiary” of a Person means any Subsidiary of such Person that is not an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
 
“S&P” means Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group.

 
124

“Securitization Assets” means any account receivable or other revenue stream subject to a Qualified Receivables Transaction.
 
“Senior Debt” means:
 
(1)all Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any Guarantor outstanding under the Senior Secured Credit Agreement and all Hedging Obligations with respect thereto;
 
(2)any other Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any Guarantor permitted to be incurred under the terms of the Indenture, unless the instrument under which such Indebtedness is incurred expressly provides that it is on a parity with or subordinated in right of payment to the Notes or any Note Guarantee; and
 
(3)all Obligations with respect to the items listed in the preceding clauses (1) and (2).
 
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding, Senior Debt will not include:
 
(1)any liability for federal, state, local or other taxes owed or owing by Aeroflex;
 
(2)any intercompany Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of its Subsidiaries to Aeroflex or any of its Subsidiaries;
 
(3)any trade payables;
 
(4)the portion of any Indebtedness that is incurred in violation of the Indenture; or
 
(5)Indebtedness which is classified as non-recourse in accordance with GAAP or any unsecured claim arising in respect thereof by reason of the application of section 1111(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.
 
“Senior Secured Credit Facility” means the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2007, entered into by and among Aeroflex as the successor by merger to Aeroflex Acquisition Corp., AX Acquisition Corp., AX Holding Corp., certain subsidiaries of Aeroflex, as guarantors, the lenders party thereto from time to time in compliance with the Indenture, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P., as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, Sole Lead Arranger, Sole Bookrunner and Syndication Agent, as amended, extended, refinanced and replaced from time to time in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, as amended, restated, modified, renewed, refunded, replaced (whether upon or after termination or otherwise), substituted or refinanced (including by means of a receivables financing or sales of debt securities to institutional investors) in whole or in part from time to time, in compliance with the Indenture including any agreement extending the maturity of, refinancing, replacing or otherwise restructuring (including increasing the amount of available borrowings or letters of credit thereunder or adding Subsidiaries of Aeroflex as additional borrowers or guarantors thereunder) all or any portion of the Indebtedness under such agreement or any successor or replacement agreement and whether by the same or any other agent, lender or group of lenders.
 
“Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit Facility” means that certain Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2007, among Aeroflex, certain subsidiaries of Aeroflex, the various lenders party thereto, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Administrative Agent.

131
 
“Significant Subsidiary” means any Subsidiary that would be a “significant subsidiary” as defined in Article 1, Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X, promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Regulation is in effect on the date of the Indenture.
 
 “Standard Securitization Undertakings” means all representations, warranties, covenants, indemnities, performance guarantees and servicing obligations entered into by Aeroflex or any Subsidiary of Aeroflex (other than a Receivables Entity) which are customary in connection with any Qualified Receivables Transaction.
 
“Stated Maturity” means, with respect to any installment of interest or principal on any series of Indebtedness, the date on which the payment of interest or principal was scheduled to be paid in the documentation governing such Indebtedness as of the date of the Indenture, and will not include any contingent obligations to repay, redeem or repurchase any such interest or principal prior to the date originally scheduled for the payment thereof.
 
“Subsidiary” means, with respect to any specified Person:

 
125

(1)any corporation, association or other business entity of which more than 50% of the total voting power of shares of Capital Stock entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any contingency and after giving effect to any voting agreement or stockholders’ agreement that effectively transfers voting power) to vote in the election of directors, managers or trustees of the corporation, association or other business entity is at the time owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by that Person or one or more of the other Subsidiaries of that Person (or a combination thereof); and
 
(2)any partnership (a) the sole general partner or the managing general partner of which is such Person or a Subsidiary of such Person or (b) the only general partners of which are that Person or one or more Subsidiaries of that Person (or any combination thereof).
 
“Total Assets” means the total consolidated assets of Aeroflex and its Restricted Subsidiaries, as shown on the most recent internal balance sheet of Aeroflex prepared on a consolidated basis (excluding Unrestricted Subsidiaries) in accordance with GAAP.
 
“Transactions” means the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 25, 2007 among AX Holding Corp., AX Acquisition Corp. and Aeroflex, and the financing of such transactions, including the borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
 
“Treasury Rate” means, as determined by Aeroflex, as of any redemption date, the yield to maturity as of such redemption date of United States Treasury securities with a constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 (519) that has become publicly available at least two business days prior to the redemption date (or, if such Statistical Release is no longer published, any publicly available source of similar market data)) most nearly equal to the period from the redemption date to August 15, 2011; provided, however, that if the period from the redemption date to August 15, 2011, is less than one year, the weekly average yield on actually traded United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year will be used.
 
“Unrestricted Subsidiary” means any Subsidiary of Aeroflex that is designated by the Board of Directors of Aeroflex as an Unrestricted Subsidiary pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors of Aeroflex, but only to the extent that such Subsidiary:
 
(1)has no Indebtedness other than Non-Recourse Debt;
 
(2)except as permitted by the covenant described above under the caption “—Certain Covenants—Transactions with Affiliates,” is not party to any agreement, contract, arrangement or understanding with Aeroflex or any Restricted Subsidiary of Aeroflex unless the terms of any such agreement, contract, arrangement or understanding are no less favorable to Aeroflex or such Restricted Subsidiary than those that might be obtained at the time from Persons who are not Affiliates of Aeroflex;
 
(3)is a Person with respect to which neither Aeroflex nor any of its Restricted Subsidiaries has any direct or indirect obligation (a) to subscribe for additional Equity Interests or (b) to maintain or preserve such Person’s financial condition or to cause such Person to achieve any specified levels of operating results; and

132
 
(4)has not guaranteed or otherwise directly or indirectly provided credit support for any Indebtedness of Aeroflex or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries unless such guarantee or credit support is released upon its designation as an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
 
“Voting Stock” of any specified Person as of any date means the Capital Stock of such Person that is at the time entitled to vote in the election of the Board of Directors of such Person.
 
“Weighted Average Life to Maturity” means, when applied to any Indebtedness at any date, the number of years obtained by dividing:
 
(1)
the sum of the products obtained by multiplying (a) the amount of each then remaining installment, sinking fund, serial maturity or other required payments of principal, including payment at final maturity, in respect of the Indebtedness, by (b) the number of years (calculated to the nearest one-twelfth) that will elapse between such date and the making of such payment; by
 
(2)the then outstanding principal amount of such Indebtedness.
126
 
BOOK-ENTRY, DELIVERY AND FORM
 
General

The Notes will be represented by one or more global notes in registered form without interest coupons attached (collectively, the “Global Notes”). Except as set forth below, all the Notes will be exchanged in registered, global form in minimum denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess of $2,000.

Global Notes will be deposited with the Trustee as custodian for The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) in New York, New York, and registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, in each case for credit to an account of a direct or indirect participant in DTC as described below. Except as set forth below, Global Notes may be transferred only to another nominee of DTC or to a successor of DTC or its nominee, in whole and not in part. Except in the limited circumstances described below, beneficial interests in Global Notes may not be exchanged for Notes in certificated form and owners of beneficial interests in Global Notes will not be entitled to receive physical delivery of Notes in certificated form. See “—Exchange of Global Notes for Certificated Notes.”

Depository procedures

The following description of the operations and procedures of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream is provided solely as a matter of convenience. These operations and procedures are solely within the control of the respective settlement systems and are subject to changes by them. The Company takes no responsibility for these operations and procedures and urges investors to contact the system or their participants directly to discuss these matters.

The company understands that DTC is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was created to hold securities for its participating organizations (collectively, the “Participants”) and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of transactions in those securities between Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of its Participants. The Participants include securities brokers and dealers (including the initial purchasers), banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. Access to DTC’s system is also available to other entities such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Participant, either directly or indirectly (collectively, the “Indirect Participants”). Persons who are not Participants may beneficially own securities held by or on behalf of DTC only through the Participants or the Indirect Participants. The ownership interests in, and transfers of ownership interests in, each security held by or on behalf of DTC are recorded on the records of the Participants and Indirect Participants.

The Company understands that, pursuant to procedures established by DTC:

(1) upon deposit of the Global Notes for a series of Notes, DTC will credit the accounts of Participants designated by the initial purchasers with portions of the principal amount of the Global Notes for such series; and

133

(2) ownership of these interests in Global Notes will be shown on, and the transfer of ownership of these interests will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to the Participants) or by the Participants and the Indirect Participants (with respect to other owners of beneficial interests in Global Notes).

All interests in a Global Note may be subject to the procedures and requirements of DTC. Interests in a Global Note held through Euroclear or Clearstream may be subject to the procedures and requirements of those systems as well. The laws of some states require that certain persons take physical delivery in definitive form of securities that they own and the ability to transfer beneficial interests in a Global Note to Persons that are subject to those requirements will be limited to that extent. Because DTC can act only on behalf of Participants, which in turn act on behalf of Indirect Participants, the ability of a person having beneficial interests in a Global Note to pledge those interests to Persons that do not participate in the DTC system, or otherwise take actions in respect of those interests, may be affected by the lack of a physical certificate evidencing those interests.

Except as described below, owners of an interest in Global Notes will not have Notes registered in their names, will not receive physical delivery of definitive Notes in registered certificated form (“Certificated Notes”) and will not be considered the registered owners or “Holders” thereof under the Indenture for any purpose.

127

Payments in respect of the principal of and premium, interest and special interest, if any, on a Global Note registered in the name of DTC or its nominee will be payable to DTC in its capacity as the registered Holder under the applicable Indenture.

Under the terms of each Indenture, the Company and the Trustee will treat the Persons in whose names Notes, including Global Notes, are registered as the owners of such Notes for the purpose of receiving payments and for all other purposes. Consequently, neither the Company, the Trustee nor any agent of the Company or the Trustee has or will have any responsibility or liability for:

(1) any aspect of DTC’s records or any Participant’s or Indirect Participant’s records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial ownership interests in Global Notes or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any of DTC’s records or any Participant’s or Indirect Participant’s records relating to the beneficial ownership interests in Global Notes; or

(2) any other matter relating to the actions and practices of DTC or any of its Participants or Indirect Participants.

The Company understands that DTC’s current practice, upon receipt of any payment in respect of securities such as the Notes (including principal and interest), is to credit the accounts of the relevant Participants with the payment on the payment date unless DTC has reason to believe it will not receive payment on that payment date. Each relevant Participant is credited with an amount proportionate to its beneficial ownership of an interest in the principal amount of the relevant security as shown on the records of DTC. Payments by the Participants and the Indirect Participants to the beneficial owners of Notes will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices and will be the responsibility of the Participants or the Indirect Participants and will not be the responsibility of DTC, the Trustee or the Company. Neither the Company nor the Trustee will be liable for any delay by DTC or any of its Participants in identifying the beneficial owners of any Notes, and the Company and the Trustee may conclusively rely on and will be protected in relying on instructions from DTC or its nominee for all purposes.

Subject to the transfer restrictions set forth under “Notice to Investors,” transfers between Participants in DTC will be effected in accordance with DTC’s procedures, and will be settled in same-day funds and transfers between participants in Euroclear and Clearstream will be effected in accordance with their respective rules and operating procedures.

Subject to compliance with the transfer restrictions applicable to the Notes described herein, cross-market transfers between the Participants, on the one hand, and Euroclear or Clearstream participants, on the other hand, will be effected through DTC in accordance with DTC’s rules on behalf of Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, by its respective depositary; however, such cross-market transactions will require delivery of instructions to Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, by the counterparty in such system in accordance with the rules and procedures and within the established deadlines (Brussels time) of such system. Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, will, if the transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its respective depositary to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving interests in the relevant Global Note from DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Euroclear participants and Clearstream participants may not deliver instructions directly to the depositories for Euroclear or Clearstream.

134

The Company understands that DTC will take any action permitted to be taken by a Holder of a given series of Notes only at the direction of one or more Participants to whose account DTC has credited the interests in the applicable series of Global Notes and only in respect of the portion of the aggregate principal amount of the applicable series of Notes as to which that Participant or those Participants has or have given the relevant direction. However, if there is an Event of Default under such series of Notes, DTC reserves the right to exchange the applicable Global Notes for legended Notes in certificated form, and to distribute those Notes to its Participants.

Although DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream have agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of interests in Global Notes among Participants, they are under no obligation to perform those procedures, and may discontinue or change those procedures at any time. Neither the Company, the Trustee nor any of their respective agents will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC, Euroclear, Clearstream or their respective Participants or Indirect Participants of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.

Exchange of Global Notes for Certificated Notes

A Global Note is exchangeable for a Certificated Note of the same series if:

128
 
DTC (a) notifies the Company that it is unwilling or unable to continue as depositary for the applicable Global Notes or (b) has ceased to be a clearing agency registered under the Exchange Act and, in each case, a successor depositary is not appointed;

the Company, at its option, notifies the Trustee in writing that it elects to cause the issuance of Certificated Notes; or

there has occurred and is continuing a Default with respect to the Notes.

In addition, beneficial interests in a Global Note may be exchanged for Certificated Notes of the same series upon prior written notice given to the Trustee by or on behalf of DTC in accordance with the applicable Indenture. In all cases, Certificated Notes delivered in exchange for any Global Note or beneficial interests in a Global Note will be registered in the names, and issued in any approved denominations, requested by or on behalf of the depositary (in accordance with its customary procedures) and will bear the applicable restrictive legend referred to in “Notice to Investors,” unless that legend is not required by applicable law.


Exchange of Certificated Notes for Global Notes

If Certificated Notes are issued in the future, they will not be exchangeable for beneficial interests in any Global Note unless the transferor first delivers to the Trustee a written certificate (in the form provided in the applicable Indenture) to the effect that the transfer will comply with the appropriate transfer restrictions applicable to the Notes being transferred.  See “Notice to Investors.”

Same day settlement and payment

The Company will make payments in respect of Notes represented by Global Notes, including payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, by wire transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts specified by the DTC or its nominee. The Company will make all payments of principal of and premium, if any, and interest, on Certificated Notes by wire transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts specified by the Holders of the Certificated Notes or, if no account is specified, by mailing a check to each Holder’s registered address.  Notes represented by Global Notes are expected to be eligible to trade in The PORTAL Market and to trade in DTC’s Same-Day Funds Settlement System, and any permitted secondary market trading activity in Notes represented by Global Notes will, therefore, be required by DTC to be settled in immediately available funds. Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a Euroclear or Clearstream participant purchasing an interest in a Global Note from a Participant will be credited, and any such crediting will be reported to the relevant Euroclear or Clearstream participant, during the securities settlement processing day (which must be a business day for Euroclear and Clearstream) immediately following the settlement date of DTC. The Company understands that cash received in Euroclear or Clearstream as a result of sales of interests in a Global Note by or through a Euroclear or Clearstream participant to a Participant will be received with value on the settlement date of DTC but will be available in the relevant Euroclear or Clearstream cash account only as of the business day for Euroclear or Clearstream following DTC’s settlement date.

135

CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME AND ESTATE TAX CONSEQUENCES

The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income and, in the case of non-U.S. holders (as defined below), estate tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Notes as of the date hereof. Except where noted, this summary deals only with Notes that are held as capital assets.

As used herein, a "U.S. holder" means a beneficial owner of the Notes that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes any of the following:

•           an individual citizen or resident of the United States;

•           a corporation (or any other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

•           an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

129

•           a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.

The term "non-U.S. holder" means a beneficial owner of the Notes (other than a partnership or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that is not a U.S. holder.

This summary does not represent a detailed description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are a person subject to special tax treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation:

•           a dealer in securities or currencies;

•           a financial institution;

•           a regulated investment company;

•           a real estate investment trust;

•           a tax-exempt organization;

•           an insurance company;

•           a person holding the Notes as part of a hedging, integrated, conversion or constructive sale transaction or a straddle;

•           a trader in securities that has elected the mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities;

•           a person liable for alternative minimum tax;

•           a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

•           a U.S. holder whose "functional currency" is not the U.S. dollar;

•           a controlled foreign corporation;

•           a passive foreign investment company; or

•           a U.S. expatriate.

This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), United States Treasury regulations, administrative rulings and judicial decisions as of the date hereof. Those authorities may be changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, so as to result in U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences different from those summarized below.

136

If a partnership (including any entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Notes, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partnership or a partner in a partnership holding Notes, you should consult your own tax advisors.

This summary does not represent a detailed description of the U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences to you in light of your particular circumstances and does not address the effects of any state, local or non-United States tax laws. It is not intended to be, and should not be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular purchaser of notes. If you are considering the purchase of Notes, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the particular U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences to you of the ownership of the Notes, as well as the consequences to you arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.

Certain Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders

The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences that will apply to U.S. holders of the Notes.


130
Payments of Interest on Notes

Stated interest on a Note will generally be taxable to you as ordinary income at the time it is paid or accrued in accordance with your method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Market Discount

If you purchase a Note for an amount that is less than its principal amount, the amount of the difference will be treated as "market discount" for U.S. federal income tax purposes, unless that difference is less than a specified de minimis amount. Under the market discount rules, you will be required to treat any principal payment on, or any gain on the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition of, a Note as ordinary income to the extent of the market discount that you have not previously included in income and are treated as having accrued on the Note at the time of its payment or disposition.

In addition, you may be required to defer, until the maturity of the Note or its earlier disposition in a taxable transaction, the deduction of all or a portion of the interest expense on any indebtedness attributable to the Note. You may elect, on a Note-by-Note basis, to deduct the deferred interest expense in a tax year prior to the year of disposition. You should consult your own tax advisors before making this election.

Any market discount will be considered to accrue ratably during the period from the date of acquisition to the maturity date of the Note, unless you elect to accrue on a constant interest method. You may elect to include market discount in income currently as it accrues, on either a ratable or constant interest method, in which case the rule described above regarding deferral of interest deductions will not apply.

Amortizable Bond Premium

If you purchase a Note for an amount in excess of its principal amount, you will be considered to have purchased the Note at a "premium." You generally may elect to amortize the premium over the remaining term of the Note on a constant yield method as an offset to interest when includible in income under your regular accounting method. If you have elected to amortize the premium, the amortizable bond premium will reduce interest income. If you do not elect to amortize bond premium, that premium will decrease the gain or increase the loss you would otherwise recognize on disposition of the Note.

Sale, Exchange, Retirement, or Other Taxable Disposition of  Notes

Upon the sale, exchange, retirement, or other taxable disposition of a Note, you generally will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition (less an amount equal to any accrued but unpaid interest, which will be taxable as interest income as discussed above to the extent not previously included in income by you) and the adjusted tax basis of the Note. Your adjusted tax basis in a Note will, in general, be your cost for that Note increased by market discount previously included in income and reduced by any amortized premium.

Any gain or loss will be capital gain or loss. Capital gains of noncorporate U.S. holders (including individuals) derived in respect of capital assets held for more than one year are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

137

Certain Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders

The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences that will apply to non-U.S. holders of the Notes.

U.S. Federal Withholding Tax

The 30% U.S. federal withholding tax will not apply to any payment of interest on the Notes under the "portfolio interest rule," provided that:

•           interest paid on the Notes is not effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States;

•           you do not actually (or constructively) own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our voting stock within the meaning of the Code and applicable United States Treasury regulations;

131

•           you are not a controlled foreign corporation that is related to us actually or constructively through stock ownership;

•           you are not a bank whose receipt of interest on the notes is described in Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code; and

•           either (a) you provide your name and address on an IRS Form W-8BEN (or other applicable form), and certify, under penalties of perjury, that you are not a United States person as defined under the Code or (b) you hold your Notes through certain foreign intermediaries and satisfy the certification requirements of applicable United States Treasury regulations. Special certification rules apply to non-U.S. holders that are pass-through entities rather than corporations or individuals.

If you cannot satisfy the requirements described above, payments of interest made to you will be subject to the 30% U.S. federal withholding tax, unless you provide us (or our paying agent) with a properly executed:

•           IRS Form W-8BEN (or other applicable form) certifying an exemption from or reduction in withholding under the benefit of an applicable income tax treaty; or

•           IRS Form W-8ECI (or other applicable form) certifying interest paid on the notes is not subject to withholding tax because it is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States (as discussed below under "—U.S. Federal Income Tax").

The 30% U.S. federal withholding tax generally will not apply to any payment of principal or gain that you realize on the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition of a Note.

U.S. Federal Income Tax

If you are engaged in a trade or business in the United States and any gain or interest on the Notes is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a United States permanent establishment), then you will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on that gain or interest on a net income basis (although you will be exempt from the 30% U.S. federal withholding tax, provided the certification requirements discussed above in "—U.S. Federal Withholding Tax" are satisfied) in generally the same manner as if you were a United States person as defined under the Code. In addition, if you are a foreign corporation, you may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30% (or lower applicable income tax treaty rate) of such gain or interest, subject to adjustments.

Any gain realized on the disposition of a Note generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless:

•           the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a United States permanent establishment); or

•           you are an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of that disposition, and certain other conditions are met.

138

U.S. Federal Estate Tax

Your estate will not be subject to U.S. federal estate tax on Notes beneficially owned by you at the time of your death, provided that any payment to you on the Notes would be eligible for exemption from the 30% U.S. federal withholding tax under the "portfolio interest rule" described above under "—U.S. Federal Withholding Tax" without regard to the statement requirement described in the fifth bullet point of that section.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

U.S. Holders

In general, information reporting requirements will apply to certain payments of principal and interest paid on the Notes and to the proceeds of the sale or other disposition of a Note paid to you (unless you are an exempt recipient such as a corporation). Backup withholding may apply to such payments if you fail to provide a taxpayer identification number or a certification that you are not subject to backup withholding.

132

Backup withholding is not an additional tax and any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Non-U.S. Holders

Generally, we must report to the IRS and to you the amount of interest paid to you and the amount of tax, if any, withheld with respect to those payments. Copies of the information returns reporting such interest payments and any withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which you reside under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.

In general, you will not be subject to backup withholding with respect to payments of interest on the Notes that we make to you provided that we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know that you are a United States person as defined under the Code, and we have received from you the required certification that you are a non-U.S. Holder described above in the fifth bullet point under "—Certain Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders—U.S. Federal Withholding Tax."

Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale or other disposition (including a redemption) of Notes within the United States or conducted through certain United States-related financial intermediaries, unless you certify to the payor under penalties of perjury that you are a non-U.S. holder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that you are a United States person as defined under the Code), or you otherwise establish an exemption.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax and any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

This prospectus is to be used by Goldman, Sachs & Co. in connection with offers and sales of the Notes in market-making transactions effected from time to time. Goldman, Sachs & Co. may act as principal or agent in such transactions. Such sales will be made at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at prices related thereothereto or at negotiated prices. We will not receive any of the proceeds from such sales.

GS Direct, L.L.C., a private equity fund affiliated with Goldman, Sachs & Co., owns approximately 22% of the Class A interests in the parent LLC.  See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”  Under the registration rights agreement we entered into with Goldman, Sachs & Co. and others at the time of the initial issuance of the Notes pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S of the Securities Act, we agreed to file a market-making prospectus, such as this prospectus, in order to enable Goldman, Sachs & Co. and its affiliates to engage in market-making activities for the Notes. Goldman, Sachs & Co. acted as Initial Purchaser in the offering of the Notes and received customary fees in connection therewith. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., acted as sole lead arranger, sole bookrunner, administrative agent, collateral agent, and syndication agent under each of our senior secured and unsecured credit facilities.  Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. has received customary fees for its services in such capacity.  In addition, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. and their affiliates may in the future engage in commercial banking, investment banking or other financial advisory transactions with us and our affiliates.  We have been advised by Goldman, Sachs & Co. that, subject to applicable laws and regulations, it intends to make a market in the Notes. However, Goldman, Sachs & Co. is not obligated to do so, and any such market-making may be interrupted or discontinued at any time without notice.

139
 
Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we agreed to indemnify Goldman, Sachs & Co. against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to payments which Goldman, Sachs & Co. might be required to make in respect thereof.

133
 
CERTAIN ERISA CONSIDERATIONS
 
The Notes may be purchased and held by an employee benefit plan subject to Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), or by an individual retirement account or other plan subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"). A fiduciary of an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA must, however, determine that the purchase and holding of a Note is consistent with its fiduciary duties under ERISA. The fiduciary of an ERISA plan, as well as any other prospective investor subject to Section 4975 of the Code or any similar law, must also determine that the purchase and holding of Notes does not result in a non-exempt prohibited transaction as defined in Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code or any similar law. Each purchaser and transferee of a Note who is subject to Section 406 of ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code or any similar law ("Plan Investor") will be deemed to have represented to us, by its acquisition and holding of the Note, that its acquisition and holding of the Notes does not constitute or give rise to a non-exempt prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code or any similar law. The sale of any Notes to any Plan Investor is in no respect a representation by us or any of our affiliates or representatives that such an investment meets all relevant legal requirements with respect to investments by Plan Investors generally or any particular Plan Investor, or that such an investment is appropriate for Plan Investors generally or any particular Plan Investor.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity and enforceability of the Notes and the related guarantees will be passed upon for us by Moomjian, Waite, Wactlar & Coleman, LLP, Jericho, New York.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements and schedule of Aeroflex Incorporated and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 (Successor Entity) and 2007 (Predecessor Entity), and for the year ended June 30, 2009 (Successor Entity), for the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 (Successor Entity) and  July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 (Predecessor Entity) and August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 (Successor Entity) and for each of the years in the two-year periodyear ended June 30, 2007 (Predecessor Entity), have been included in this prospectus and the registration statement in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.  The audit report covering the June 30, 20082009 consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective July 1, 2007 and the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, effective June 30, 2007, the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective July 1, 2005, and the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, effective June 30, 2006.2007.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the Notes. This prospectus does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. You will find additional information about us and the Notes in the registration statement.  We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and, in accordance therewith, we file reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto, as well as other information that we file with the SEC, at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at l-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains information that registrants, including us, file electronically with the SEC. Statements made in this prospectus about legal documents may not necessarily be complete and you should read the documents, which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement or otherwise filed with the SEC. Our website address is www.aeroflex.com. The contents of our website are not incorporated by reference into this prospectus.

 
140134
 
 
AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
AND SUBSIDIARIES

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2008
INDEX PAGE
I N D E X
   
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:  
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-2
  
 
Consolidated financial statements:  
   
Balance sheets – June 30, 20082009 (Successor) and 2007 (Predecessor)2008 (Successor) F-3
   
Statements of operations –  F-4
Fiscal YearsYear Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (Predecessor)2009 (Successor)  
Periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 (Successor)
and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 (Predecessor)  
and August 15, 2007 toFiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008 (Successor)2007 (Predecessor) F-4
   
Statements of stockholder’s equity and comprehensive income (loss) -– F-5 
Fiscal YearsYear Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (Predecessor)2009 (Successor)  
Periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 (Successor)
and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 (Predecessor)  
and August 15, 2007 toFiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008 (Successor)2007 (Predecessor) F-5
   
Statements of cash flows –  F-6
Fiscal YearsYear Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (Predecessor)2009 (Successor)  
Periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 (Successor)
and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 (Predecessor)  
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007 (Predecessor) F-6
and August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 (Successor)   
 
Notes to the consolidated financial statements F-7 – F-49
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)F-50
Schdule II-Valuation and Qualifying AccountsF-51F-56
 
 
F-1
 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholder
Aeroflex Incorporated and Subsidiaries:
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aeroflex Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 (Successor Entity) and 2007 (Predecessor Entity), and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder’s equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2009 (Successor Entity), for the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 (Successor Entity) and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 (Predecessor Entity) and each of the years in the two year period ended June 30, 2007 (Predecessor Entity). In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aeroflex Incorporated and subsidiaries as of June 30, 20082009 and 2007,2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2009, for the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and each offor the years in the two year period ended June 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
 
As discussed in note 12notes 14 and 16 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – anTaxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective July 1, 2007, as discussed in note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, the Companyand adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsSFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, effective June 30, 2007, and as discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, 2007.effective July 1, 2005, and the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, effective June 30, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Melville, New York
September 1, 2009
 

F-2

Aeroflex Incorporated
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)data )

 June 30,  June 30,  June 30,  June 30, 
 2008  2007  2009  2008 
 Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Successor Entity  Successor Entity 
Assets            
Current assets:            
Cash and cash equivalents $54,149  $13,000  $57,748  $54,149 
Marketable securities -  9,500 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful        
accounts of $2,683 and $1,589 147,983  139,041 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,250 and $2,683  130,429   147,983 
Inventories 134,891  139,857   135,603   134,891 
Deferred income taxes 27,039  16,520   35,164   27,039 
Assets of discontinued operations -  6,394 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  12,184   11,104   9,938   12,184 
Total current assets 376,246  335,416   368,882   376,246 
                
Property, plant and equipment, net 104,649  81,412   100,907   104,649 
Deferred income taxes -  12,689 
Non-current marketable securities 19,960  -   17,677   19,960 
Deferred financing costs, net 30,185  36   25,754   30,185 
Other assets 18,560  16,107   15,425   18,560 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net 344,866  46,774   292,553   344,866 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives 123,378  -   112,266   123,378 
Goodwill  461,155   181,962   428,133   461,155 
                
Total assets $1,478,999  $674,396  $1,361,597  $1,478,999 
                
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                
Current liabilities:                
Current portion of long-term debt $5,574  $2,164  $5,590  $5,574 
Accounts payable  39,382  38,277   36,574   39,382 
Advance payments by customers and deferred revenue  27,144  20,272   33,418   27,144 
Income taxes payable  1,936  7,612   5,080   1,936 
Liabilities of discontinued operations  -  2,394 
Accrued payroll expenses  24,525  21,092   18,876   24,525 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  56,830   42,002   47,938   56,830 
Total current liabilities 155,391  133,813   147,476   155,391 
                
Long-term debt  873,237  1,419   883,758   873,237 
Deferred income taxes  159,457  -   143,048   159,457 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,263  17,528   6,079   6,263 
Other long-term liabilities  8,003   10,939   21,476   8,003 
Total liabilities  1,202,351   163,699   1,201,837   1,202,351 
                
Stockholder's equity:                
Predecessor preferred stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 1,000,000 shares        
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value        
$.10 per share, authorized 110,000 shares; none issued -  - 
Predecessor common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 110,000,000        
shares; issued and outstanding 75,194,000 shares -  7,519 
Successor common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 1,000        
shares; issued and outstanding 1,000 shares -  - 
Common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 1,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,000 shares  -   - 
Additional paid-in capital  381,666  388,801   396,573   381,666 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  407  27,646   (54,700)  407 
Retained earnings (deficit)  (105,425)  86,731 
Accumulated deficit  (182,113)  (105,425)
Total stockholder's equity  276,648   510,697   159,760   276,648 
              
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $1,478,999  $674,396  $1,361,597  $1,478,999 

See notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

 
F-3
 

Aeroflex Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands)

  Year Ended  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Year Ended 
  June 30, 2009  to June 30, 2008  to August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
             
Net sales $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 
Cost of sales  314,231   352,953   22,861   308,969 
Gross profit  285,105   252,038   15,360   284,177 
                 
Selling, general and administrative costs  128,356   121,086   19,031   129,621 
Research and development costs  70,106   69,898   12,178   76,717 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  62,962   73,076   1,692   13,006 
Acquired in-process research and development costs  1,665   24,975   -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  -   32,493   3,717   30,584 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  41,225   -   -   - 
   304,314   321,528   36,618   249,928 
Operating income (loss)  (19,209)  (69,490)  (21,258)  34,249 
                 
Other income (expense)                
Interest expense  (83,823)  (74,658)  (275)  (672)
Other income (expense), net  11,012   4,617   294   152 
Total other income (expense)  (72,811)  (70,041)  19   (520)
                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (92,020)  (139,531)  (21,239)  33,729 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (15,332)  (38,927)  (6,831)  24,935 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (76,688)  (100,604)  (14,408)  8,794 
                 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes  -   (4,821)  (2,508)  (3,868)
                 
Net income (loss) $(76,688) $(105,425) $(16,916)  4,926 
  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Year Ended  Year Ended 
   to June 30,  to August 14,  June 30,  June 30, 
   2008  2007  2007  2006 
   Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
             
Net sales $604,991  $38,221  $593,146  $546,243 
Cost of sales  352,953   22,861   308,969   284,312 
Gross profit  252,038   15,360   284,177   261,931 
                 
Selling, general and administrative costs  121,086   19,031   129,621   122,871 
Research and development costs  69,898   12,178   76,717   72,055 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  73,076   1,692   13,006   13,778 
Acquired in-process research and development costs  24,975   -   -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  32,493   3,717   30,584   - 
   321,528   36,618   249,928   208,704 
Operating income (loss)  (69,490)  (21,258)  34,249   53,227 
                 
Other income (expense)                
Interest expense  (74,658)  (275)  (672)  (608)
Other income (expense), net  4,617   294   152   1,669 
Total other income (expense)  (70,041)  19   (520)  1,061 
                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (139,531)  (21,239)  33,729   54,288 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (38,927)  (6,831)  24,935   20,540 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (100,604)  (14,408)  8,794   33,748 
                 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of                
tax benefit  (4,821)  (2,508)  (3,868)  (5,652)
                 
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting                
principle  (105,425)  (16,916)  4,926   28,096 
                 
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net                
of tax benefit of $490  -   -   -   (1,137)
                 
Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(16,916) $4,926  $26,959 

See notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

F-4

Aeroflex Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder's Equity
and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In thousands)

             Accumulated                         Accumulated       
          Additional  Other Comp-  Retained                   Additional  Other Comp-  Retained    
    Common Stock  Paid-in  rehensive  Earnings  Treasury Stock  Comprehensive     Common Stock  Paid-in  rehensive  Earnings  Comprehensive 
 Total  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Income(Loss)  (Deficit)  Shares  Cost  Income (Loss)  Total  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Income(Loss)  (Deficit)  Income (Loss) 
Predecessor Entity:                                                
Balance, June 30, 2005 $443,980  74,618  $7,462  $372,666  $9,020  $54,846  4  $(14)   
Stock issued upon exercise of                           
stock options, including tax benefit 5,913  691  69  5,844  -  -          
Share-based compensation 6,772  -  -  6,772  -  -  -  -    
Stock repurchase and retirement (402) (39) (4) (412) -  -  (4) 14    
Other comprehensive income 4,448  -  -  -  4,448  -  -  -  $4,448 
Net income  26,959   -   -   -   -   26,959   -   -   26,959 
Balance, June 30, 2006  487,670   75,270   7,527   384,870   13,468   81,805   -   -  $31,407  $487,670  75,270  $7,527  $384,870  $13,468  $81,805    
Stock issued upon exercise of                                                      
stock options, including tax benefit 17,031  1,678  168  16,863  -  -           17,031  1,678  168  16,863  -  -    
Share-based compensation 4,126  -  -  4,126  -  -  -  -     4,126  -  -  4,126  -  -    
Stock repurchase and retirement (17,234) (1,754) (176) (17,058) -  -  -  -     (17,234) (1,754) (176) (17,058) -  -    
Other comprehensive income 14,906  -  -  -  14,906  -  -  -  $14,906  14,906  -  -  -  14,906  -  $14,906 
Net income 4,926  -  -  -  -  4,926  -  -  4,926  4,926  -  -  -  -  4,926  4,926 
Adjustment related to adoption                                   
of FASB Statement No. 158, net of                                   
tax (Note 14)  (728)  -   -   -   (728)  -   -   -   - 
Adjustment related to adoption of FASB Statement No. 158, net of tax (Note 16)  (728)  -   -   -   (728)  -   - 
Balance, June 30, 2007  510,697   75,194   7,519   388,801   27,646   86,731   -   -  $19,832  510,697  75,194  7,519  388,801  27,646  86,731  $19,832 
Stock issued upon exercise of                           
stock options, including tax benefit 13,124  51  5  13,119  -  -          
Stock issued upon exercise of stock options, including tax benefit  13,124   51   5   13,119   -   -     
Share-based compensation 214  -  -  214  -  -  -  -     214  -  -  214  -  -     
Other comprehensive income (497) -  -  -  (497) -  -  -  $(497)
Net income (loss) - July 1, 2007 to                                   
August 14, 2007 (16,916) -  -  -  -  (16,916) -  -  (16,916)
Other comprehensive income (loss) (497) -  -  -  (497) -  $(497)
Net income (loss) - July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007  (16,916)  -   -   -   -   (16,916)  (16,916)
                                                               
Adjustments for the effects of the Merger  (506,622)  (75,245)  (7,524)  (402,134)  (27,149)  (69,815)  -   -         (506,622)  (75,245)  (7,524)  (402,134)  (27,149)  (69,815)    
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -  $(17,413) -  -  -  -  -  -  $(17,413)
Successor Entity:                                                               
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 378,350  1  -  378,350  -  -  -  -     378,350  1  -  378,350  -  -     
Share-based compensation 3,123  -  -  3,123  -  -  -  -     3,123  -  -  3,123  -  -     
Accretion of interest on equity classified                           
award 193  -  -  193  -  -  -  -    
Accretion of interest on equity classified award  193   -   -   193   -   -     
Other comprehensive income 407  -  -  -  407  -  -  -  $407  407  -  -  -  407  -  $407 
Net income (loss) - August 15, 2007 to                                   
June 30, 2008  (105,425)  -   -   -   -   (105,425)  -   -   (105,425)
Net income (loss) - August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008  (105,425)  -   -   -   -   (105,425)  (105,425)
Balance, June 30, 2008 $276,648   1  $-  $381,666  $407  $(105,425)  -  $-  $(105,018) 276,648  1  -  381,666  407  (105,425) $(105,018)
                            
Share-based compensation 1,955  -  -  1,955  -  -     
Accretion of interest on equity classified award  252   -   -   252   -   -     
Capital contribution of 71% ownership interest in VI Technology  12,700   -   -   12,700   -   -     
Other comprehensive income (loss) (55,107) -  -  -  (55,107) -  $(55,107)
                            
Net income (loss)  (76,688)  -   -   -   -   (76,688)  (76,688)
Balance, June 30, 2009 $159,760   1  $-  $396,573  $(54,700) $(182,113) $(131,795)

See notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

F-5

Aeroflex Incorporated
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)

 August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Year  Year 
 to June 30,  to August 14,  Ended June 30,  Ended June 30,  Year Ended  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Year Ended 
 2008  2007  2007  2006  June 30,  to June 30,  to August 14,  June 30, 
 Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity  
2009
  
2008
  
2007
  
2007
 
             
Successor Entity
  
Successor Entity
  
Predecessor Entity
  
Predecessor Entity
 
Cash flows from operating activities:                        
Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(16,916) $4,926  $26,959  $(76,688) $(105,425) $(16,916) $4,926 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax -  -  -  1,137 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  4,821   2,508   3,868   5,652 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes  -   4,821   2,508   3,868 
Income (loss) from continuing operations (100,604) (14,408) 8,794  33,748  (76,688) (100,604) (14,408) 8,794 
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing                
operations to net cash provided by (used in)                
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)                
to net cash provided by (used in)                
operating activities:                            
Depreciation and amortization 93,032  3,662  30,142  30,371  84,426  93,032  3,662  30,142 
Acquired in-process research and development costs 24,975  -  -  -  1,665  24,975  -  - 
Acquisition related adjustment to cost of sales 38,968  -  -  -  668  38,968  -  - 
Acquisition related adjustment to sales 2,510  -  -  -  416  2,510  -  - 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles 41,225  -  -  - 
Deferred income taxes (40,830) 5,284  (7,184) (11,904) (19,596) (40,830) 5,284  (7,184)
Non - cash share based compensation 3,123  214  4,126  6,653  1,955  3,123  214  4,126 
Non - cash restructuring charges 485  -  753  -  -  485  -  753 
Amortization of deferred financing costs 3,514  -  -  -  4,771  3,514  217  - 
Paid in kind interest 11,340  -  -  -  16,111  11,340  -  - 
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements -  (12,542) (2,870) (551)  -   -   (12,542)  (2,870)
Other, net 1,422  (24) 106  666  1,161  1,422  (24) 106 
Change in operating assets and liabilities,                
net of effects from purchases of businesses:                
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchases of businesses:                
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable (56,051) 47,889  (19,902) (23,911) 10,054  (56,051) 47,889  (19,902)
Decrease (increase) in inventories 13,509  (12,885) (7,878) (9,047) (5,329) 13,509  (12,885) (7,878)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses                
and other assets 23,677  (26,682) (760) 496 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued                
expenses and other liabilities  (4,874)  21,246   17,152   14,770 
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets  4,499   23,677   (26,899)  (760)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities  (10,881)  (4,874)  21,246   17,152 
                            
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations 14,196  11,754  22,479  41,291  54,457  14,196  11,754  22,479 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued                
operations  (5,286)  (461)  (1,677)  (4,594)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (5,286)  (461)  (1,677)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  8,910   11,293   20,802   36,697   54,457   8,910   11,293   20,802 
                                
Cash flows from investing activities:                                
Acquisition of predecessor entity, net of cash acquired (1,118,293) -  -  - 
Payment for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired (11,145) -  (10,663) - 
Acquisition of Predecessor Entity, net of cash acquired -  (1,118,293) -  - 
Payments for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired (18,935) (11,145) -  (10,663)
Contingent payment for purchase of business -  -  (9,247) -  -  -  -  (9,247)
Capital expenditures (13,179) (1,088) (18,427) (15,365) (18,717) (13,179) (1,088) (18,427)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment 229  -  480  116  1,439  229  -  480 
Purchase of marketable securities (631,805) (53,828) (589,577) (348,545) -  (631,805) (53,828) (589,577)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities 611,853  63,328  608,409  320,213   -   611,853   63,328   608,409 
Preacquisition tax refund received -  -  -  1,232 
Other, net  -   -   -   (77)
                            
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations (1,162,340) 8,412  (19,025) (42,426)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities by continuing operations  (36,213)  (1,162,340)  8,412   (19,025)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  (36)  (6)  (88)  (127)  -   (36)  (6)  (88)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (1,162,376)  8,406   (19,113)  (42,553)  (36,213)  (1,162,376)  8,406   (19,113)
                            
Cash flows from financing activities:                                
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 378,350  -  -  -  -  378,350  -  - 
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock -  -  (17,234) (402) -  -  -  (17,234)
Borrowings under debt agreements 870,000  -  -  -  -  870,000  -  - 
Debt repayments (6,083) (29) (611) (658) (5,574) (6,083) (29) (611)
Debt financing costs (33,222) (477) -  (308) (340) (33,222) (477) - 
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements -  12,542  2,870  551   -   -   12,542   2,870 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants -  583  14,182  4,565  -  -  583  14,182 
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises (14,142) (56) (3,383) (1,062) -  (14,142) (56) (3,383)
Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  14,142   56   3,383   1,062   -   14,142   56   3,383 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  1,209,045   12,619   (793)  3,748 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash                
and cash equivalents  (1,430)  178   1,717   (479)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (5,914)  1,209,045   12,619   (793)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (8,731)  (1,430)  178   1,717 
                            
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 54,149  32,496  2,613  (2,587) 3,599  54,149  32,496  2,613 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  -   13,000   10,387   12,974   54,149   -   13,000   10,387 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $54,149  $45,496  $13,000  $10,387  $57,748  $54,149  $45,496  $13,000 
 
See notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

 
F-6
 
 
AEROFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The Company and its Sale
Aeroflex Incorporated and its subsidiaries (the “Company,”“Company”, “we”, or “our”) design, engineer and manufacture microelectronics and test solution and measurement equipment that are sold primarily to the broadband communications, aerospace and defense markets. Our fiscal year ends on June 30.

On August 15, 2007, the Company was sold toacquired by affiliates of or funds managed by The Veritas Capital Fund Ill, L.P. (“Veritas”), Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc. (“Golden Gate”) and GS Direct, L.L.C. (“GS Direct”) and certain members of management (“the Merger”) (see Note 3).

Presentation and Use of Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. TheyWe consolidate our subsidiaries, all of which, except for Test Evolution Corporation (see Note 4), are wholly owned. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements presented as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and for the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 represent the Company subsequent to its acquisition (the “Successor” or “Successor Entity”), whereas the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2007 and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and the period from July 1, 2007periods prior to August 14,15, 2007 represent the Company prior to the Merger (the “Predecessor” or “Predecessor Entity”). The purchase method of accounting was applied effective August 15, 2007 in connection with the Merger. Therefore, our consolidated financial statements for periods before August 15, 2007 are presented on a different basis than those for the periods after August 14, 2007 and, as such, are not comparable.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires that management of the Company make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among the more significant estimates included in our consolidated financial statements are revenue and cost recognition under long-term contracts; the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories, investments and deferred tax assets; the depreciable lives of fixed assets and useful lives of amortizable intangible assets; the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations; the recoverability of long-lived amortizable intangible assets, tradenames and goodwill, as well as net assets of discontinued operations;goodwill; share-based compensation; restructuring charges; asset retirement obligationsobligations; fair value measurement of financial assets and liabilities and certain accrued expenses and contingencies.

The Company isWe are subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic, environmental and political factors and changes in the business climate; therefore, actual results may differ from those estimates. When no estimate in a given range is deemed to be better than any other when estimating contingent liabilities, the low end of the range is accrued. Accordingly, the accounting estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made when circumstances warrant them. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments having maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition are considered to be cash equivalents.


Marketable Securities
Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses net of taxes, reported as a separate component of stockholder’s equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in market value judged to be other than temporary, of which there were none, for the three years ended June 30, 2008,2009, are included in other income.income (expense). Interest income and dividends are also included in other income.

At June 30, 2008,2009, our marketable securities consisted primarily of $19.9$17.7 million of auction rate securities, whose carrying amount approximated their fair value.which is net of a $2.3 million valuation allowance. Auction rate securities represent long-term (generally maturities of ten years to thirty-five years from the date of issuance) variable rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates that are reset through an auction process, which occurs every seven to thirty-five days, and are classified as available for sale securities. All but one (with the one security having a carrying value of $1.9$1.7 million and a AAan A rating) of our auction rate securities retain a triple-A rating by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. In addition, certain of our auction rate securities are backed by student loans whose principal and interest are federally guaranteed by the Family Federal Education Loan Program.  To date, weWe have collected all interest payments on all of our auction rate securities when due and expectsince early February 2008 (when auctions began to do sofail) have redeemed $27.5 million of auction rate securities at par, including $1.0 million redeemed at par in the future.July 2009.

At June 30, 2008,2009, the par value of our auction rate securities was $19.9 million; however we concludedhave estimated that the fair value of our auction rate securities would not be significantly different than the cost basis. However,as of that date was $17.7 million.  Since many auctions are failing and given that there is currently no active secondary market for our investment in auction rate securities, the determination of fair value inwas based on the future could be negatively impacted by factors including, but not limited to:following factors:

·continuing illiquidity for an extended period of time;illiquidity;

·lack of action by the issuers to establish different forms of financing to replace or redeem these securities; and

·changes in the credit quality of the underlying securities.

IfAs fair values werehave continued to decreasebe below cost, for a prolonged period of time, we would considerhave considered various factors in determining whether a credit loss exists and whether to recognize an other than temporary impairment charge, including the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below the cost basis, the timely receipt of all interest payments, the rating of the security, the relatively low volatility of the security’s fair value, the current financial condition of the issuer and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

Auction rate securities are classified as non-current assets in the accompanying June 30, 2008 consolidated balance sheet.  Marketable securities at June 30, 2007 of $9.5 million consisted of auction rate securities that equaled their fair value.sheets.

Inventories

Inventories, including amounts related to long-term contracts accounted for under percentage-of-completion accounting, are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

Financial Instruments and Derivatives

Foreign currency contracts are used in certain circumstances to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates. We enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges. Thus the change in fair value is included in income as it occurs, within other income (expense). As of June 30, 2008, we had $2.8 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through September 2008. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of the Company, but are used in the calculationconsolidated statement of cash settlements under the contracts. The fair value of these contracts at June 30, 2008 and 2007 was insignificant.operations.

Our interest rate swap derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges. As such, they are recorded on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities at their fair value, with changes in the fair value of such derivatives, net of taxes, recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. The fair value of the interest rate swap derivatives as of June 30, 2008 was an asset of $2.2 million ($1.4 million, net of taxes).

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectibilitycollectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.


For arrangements other than certain long-term contracts, revenue (including shipping and handling fees) is recognized when products are shipped and title has passed to the customer. If title does not pass until the product reaches the customer’s delivery site, then recognition of the revenue is deferred until that time. Certain of our sales are to distributors which have a right to return some portion of product within up to eighteen months of sale. We recognize revenue on these sales at the time of shipment to the distributor, as the returns under these arrangements have been insignificant and can be reasonably estimated. A provision for such estimated returns is recorded at the time sales are recognized.

Long-term contracts are accounted for in accordance with SOP 81-1 “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.”  We determine estimated contract profit rates and use the percentage-of-completion method to recognize revenues and associated costs as work progresses on certain long-term contracts. We measure the extent of progress toward completion generally based upon one of the following methods (based upon an assessment of which method most closely aligns to the underlying earnings process),: (i) the units-of-delivery method, (ii) the cost-to-cost method, using the ratio of contract costs incurred as a percentage of total estimated costs at contract completion (based upon engineering and production estimates), or (iii) the achievement of contractual milestones. Provisions for anticipated losses or revisions in estimated profits on contracts-in-process are recorded in the period in which such anticipated losses or revisions become evident.

Revenue from sales of products where software is other than incidental to their performance, including related software support and maintenance contracts is recognized in accordance with SOP-97-2,SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” Accordingly, revenue for software is recognized when the software is delivered, if all of the above criteria for revenue recognition are met.

When a customer purchases software together with post contract support, we allocate a portion of the fee to the post contract support for its fair value based on the contractual renewal rate or the amount the support is sold for on a standalone basis. Post contract support fees are deferred in Advance Payments by Customers and Deferred Revenue in the consolidated balance sheets, and recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the related contract.

Acquisition Accounting

We use the purchase method to account for business combinations, whereby the total cost of an acquisition is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price is dependent upon certain valuations and other studies, which contain estimates and assumptions.

Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the cost of purchased businesses over the fair value of their underlying net assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of tradenames. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized. Definite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of customer related intangibles and developed technology, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging up to 11 years.  
We testassess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles at least annually for impairment and wheneveras of June 30, or more frequently if certain events or circumstances indicate an impairment mightmay have occurred.  We evaluate the recoverability oftest goodwill using a two-stepfor impairment test approach at the reporting unit level. In the first step,level, which is used toone level below our operating segments.  We identify potential impairments,our reporting units by assessing whether the overall fair valuecomponents of our operating segments constitute businesses for thewhich discrete financial information is available and management of each reporting unit regularly reviews the operating results of those components.  Impairment testing is compared to its carrying amount including goodwill. Ifperformed in two steps: (i) we determine if there is an impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, and (ii) if there is less thanan impairment, we measure the carrying amount a second step is performed which comparesof impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the carrying amount(the excess of the goodwill. The implied fair value for the goodwill is determined based on the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit andover the fair value of its net identifiable assets.assets) with the carrying amount of that goodwill.  The impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets encompasses calculating a fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and comparing the fair value to its carrying value.  If the impliedcarrying value exceeds the fair value, impairment is recorded.
Testing goodwill for impairment requires us to estimate fair values of reporting units using significant estimates and assumptions.  The assumptions made will impact the outcome and ultimate results of the testing.  We use industry accepted valuation models and set criteria that are reviewed and approved by various levels of management and, in certain instances, we engage third-party valuation specialists to assist us in estimating fair values.  To determine fair value of the goodwill is less than its carrying amount,reporting unit, we generally use an income approach.  We use a market approach to assess the difference is recognizedreasonableness of the results of the income approach.
Under the income approach, we determine fair value using a discounted cash flow method, estimating future cash flows of each reporting unit, as an impairment.well as terminal value, and discounting such cash flows at a rate of return that reflects the relative risk of the cash flows.

Our amortizable intangible assets, whichThe key estimates and factors used in the income approach include, but are comprised primarilynot limited to, revenue growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts, terminal value and the weighted-average cost of developed technologycapital used to discount future cash flows. The fiscal 2009 compound annual growth rate of sales for the first 6 years of our projections ranged between 4% and customer related intangibles, are subject24%.  The fiscal 2008 compound annual growth rate of sales for the first 6 years of our projections ranged between 1% and 15%. The terminal growth rates were projected at 5% after between 7 to amortization over periods ranging up10 years in fiscal 2009 as compared with 5% after between 9 to 11 years principallyin fiscal 2008, which reflects our estimate of long term market and gross domestic product growth.  The weighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows ranged from 14% to 19% in fiscal 2009 as compared with 13% to 16% in fiscal 2008.  Future changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the results of our reviews for impairment of goodwill.  Changes in the valuation assumptions from those used in the prior year primarily reflect the impact of the current economic environment on the reporting units and their projected future results of operations.
To determine fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, we use an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method.  This method assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a straight-line basis. third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to obtain the rights to use the comparable asset.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets’ fair values require significant judgments in determining both the assets’ estimated cash flows as well as the appropriate discount and royalty rates applied to those cash flows to determine fair value.  Changes in such estimates or the application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results.
We review other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  When such events or changes in circumstances occur, a recoverability test is performed comparing projected undiscounted cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of an asset or asset group to its carrying value.  If the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment would be recorded for the excess of the carrying value over the fair value, which is determined by discounting future cash flows.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, principally on thea straight-line basis. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease, including anticipated renewals, or the estimated life of the asset, whichever is shorter.

We periodically review our depreciable and amortizable long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.


In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 47 (“FIN 47”), “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143.”  FIN 47 clarified the terms of FASB Statement No. 143 and requires an entity to recognize a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation if there is sufficient information to reasonably estimate its fair value. The adoption of FIN 47 resulted in the recognition of fixed assets and an asset retirement obligation liability for certain leased premises of $2.4 million each, accumulated depreciation of $1.6 million and an after tax charge of $1.1 million which is reflected as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the fiscal 2006 statement of earnings.

Research and Development Costs

We charge all research and development costs to expense as incurred, except those of our software products for which costs incurred between the date of product technological feasibility and the date that the software is available for general release are capitalized. We use a working model of the software or a detailed program design to assess technological feasibility. We capitalized software development costs of $209,000, $1.2 million, $0 and $593,000, and $0, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively. Capitalized software development costs are amortized to cost of sales based on the higher of a) the percentage of revenue for units delivered to total anticipated revenue for the related product, or b) on a straight-line basis.  Capitalized software development costs of $328,000 and $1.2 million and $242,000 were included in other assets at June 30, 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively.

Income Taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Share Based Compensation

The fair value of share based payments is recognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the related vesting periods.  Share based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the portion of share based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest and has therefore been reduced for estimated forfeitures at the time of the grant, with subsequent revisions for the differences between actual and the estimated forfeiture rates.

Foreign Currency Translations

The financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are measured in their local currency and then translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method. Under the current rate method, assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates prevailing throughout the year.

Gains and losses resulting from the translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) and presented as part of stockholder’s equity. Realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains (losses) from the settlement of foreign currency transactions are reflected in other income (expense) and amounted to $9.0 million, $2.3 million, $193,000 and $(1.3 million) and $(23,000) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income (loss) and equity adjustments relating to foreign currency translation, changes in fair value of certain derivatives and non-current marketable securities and adjustments to the minimum pension liability and is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity and Comprehensive Income.


EarningsIncome (Loss) Per Share
We have not presented earnings (loss) per share data because all 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2008 are held by one shareholder..

Recently IssuedAdopted Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In September 2006, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”Measurements,” to clarify the definition of fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expand the disclosures abouton fair value measurements.  SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price).  SFAS No. 157 also stipulates that, as a market-based measurement, fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (a) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (b) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). SFAS 157 appliesThis statement became effective for us on July 1, 2008 with respect to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurementsfinancial assets and does not require any new fair value measurements.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13.”  This FSP amendsliabilities.  The additional disclosures required by SFAS No. 157 to exclude certain leasing transactions accounted for under previously existing accounting guidance.  However, this scope exception does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumedare included in a business combination, regardless of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases.Note 10.

SFAS No. 157 becomes effective for us in the beginning of fiscal 2009.  We are currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on our consolidated financial statements.  In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date for FASB Statement No. 157.”  This FSP permits the delayed application of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, as defined in this FSP, except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least annually, until the beginning of our fiscal 2010.  As of July 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 (see Note 10), with the exception of its application to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which we deferred in accordance with FSP No. FAS 157-2.  We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS No. 157 at the beginning of fiscal 2010 for such nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157 when there has been a significant decrease in market activity for a financial asset or liability in relation to normal activity and circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. An entity is required to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was distressed on the weight of the evidence presented.  This FSP also re-affirms that the objective of fair value, when the market for an asset is not active, is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly market (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction).  Additional enhanced disclosures are also required in accordance with this FSP.  FSP No. FAS 157-4 became effective for us for the quarter ending June 30, 2009.  The adoption of FSP No. FAS 157-4 applied to our auction rate securities and did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements (see Note 10). 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” to permit all entities to choose to elect, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  An entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date, and recognize upfront costs and fees related to those items in earnings as incurred.incurred and not deferred.  SFAS No. 159 applies to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,became effective for us as of July 1, 2008.  As we did not elect the fair value option for our financial instruments (other than those already measured at fair value in accordance with earlySFAS No. 157), the adoption permitted forof this Statement did not have an entity that has also elected to apply the provisions of SFAS 157. An entity is prohibited from retrospectively applying SFAS 159, unless it chooses early adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact if any, that the provisions of SFAS 159 will have on itsour consolidated financial statements when it becomesstatements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” principally to require publicly traded companies to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements.  FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 became effective for the fiscal yearus during our quarter ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this disclosure-only guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (“FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2”).  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 provides additional guidance on the timing of impairment recognition and greater clarity about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold.  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 also requires additional disclosures about impairments in interim and annual reporting periods.  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 became effective for us during our quarter ending June 30, 2009.  The adoption of FSP No. FAS 115/124-2 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Among other changes, under SFAS No. 141(R), the fair value of contingent consideration would be recorded on the acquisition date.  SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for acquisitions consummated by us on or after July 1, 2009.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies,” to require that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably determined.  If the fair value of such assets or liabilities cannot be reasonably determined, then they would generally be recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” and FASB Interpretation No. 14, “Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5.”  This FSP also amends the subsequent accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination and certain other disclosure requirements.  This FSP is effective for us for acquisitionsassets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations that are consummated on or after July 1, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No,No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51.” SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the provisions of SFAS No. 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.


In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.”  SFAS 161 requires companies to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, quantitative disclosures of the fair values and gains and losses of these derivative instruments in a tabular format, as well as more information about liquidity by requiring disclosure of a derivative contract’s credit-risk-related contingent features.  SFAS 161 also requires cross-referencing within footnotes to enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. The Company is currently evaluating the disclosure requirements of SFAS 161. As this is a disclosure-only standard, there will be no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a result of its adoption. SFAS 161 becomes effective for our March 2009 interim consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.”  This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This FSP also adds certain disclosures to those already proscribedprescribed in SFAS No. 142.  This FSP 142-3 becomes effective for the annual and interim periods within the year, beginning in the Company’sour fiscal 2010. The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.”  This FSP provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years.  Upon  The adoption a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions in this FSP.  Early application of this FSP is prohibited.  Wenot expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements when adopted on July 1, 2009.
In November 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on EITF Issue No. 08-6, “Accounting for Equity Method Investment Considerations.”  EITF No. 08-6 addresses questions about the potential effect of SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160 on equity-method accounting.  The primary issues include how the initial carrying value of an equity method investment should be determined, how to account for any subsequent purchases and sales of additional ownership interests, and whether the investor must separately assess its underlying share of the investee’s indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment.  The adoption of EITF No. 08-6 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements because we have no equity method investments and is effective on a prospective basis beginning in our fiscal 2010.  The adoption date of EITF No. 08-6 coincides with that of SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160. 
In June 2009, the FASB issued any share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rightsSFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162,” which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to dividends or dividend equivalents.be applied in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP.  This Statement explicitly recognizes the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  The adoption of this Statement will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements when adopted in our quarter ending September 30, 2009.

2.          Discontinued Operations

As a result of continued operating losses, in June 2007 our then boardBoard of directorsDirectors approved a formal plan to divest our radar business (“Radar”) and to seek a strategic buyer. This business had previously been included in the Test Solutions segment.��  As a result of this decision, the operating results of Radar, net of taxes, had been classified in the consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented and we recorded a $1.6 million ($1.0 million, net of tax) impairment charge in June 2007 based upon appraisals of the business performed by third parties, which resulted in the write-off of $771,000 of goodwill and $322,000 of equipment, with the balance reducing inventory. We recorded further losses on disposal of $3.7 million ($2.4 million, net of tax) in the predecessor period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, to reflect the net assets of Radar at their net realizable value based on the May 15, 2008 sale of the business for $750,000. The sale agreement provided for additional contingent consideration, which iswas not included in the calculation of the loss on disposal as realization iswas not probable.

F-14

Net sales and income (loss) from discontinued operations (including impairment charges), which were solely related to Radar, were as follows:

F-12

        Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year 
   August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended  Ended 
   June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007  June 30, 2006 
   Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
       
 Net sales $893  $120  $6,422  $6,918 
                 
Income (loss) from discontinued                
   operations before income taxes $(5,928) $(3,861) $(6,041) $(8,971)
 Income tax (benefit)  (1,107)  (1,353)  (2,173)  (3,319)
 Income (loss) from                
   discontinued operations $(4,821) $(2,508) $(3,868) $(5,652)
As of June 30, 2008 and 2007, the net assets of the discontinued operations consisted of the following:

  June 30,  June 30, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
       
Accounts receivable $-  $984 
Inventory  -   5,410 
Current assets  -   6,394 
Accounts payable  -   74 
Accrued expenses  -   2,320 
Current liabilities  -   2,394 
Net assets $-  $4,000 

In March 2005, we sold the net assets of our shock and vibration control device manufacturing business (“VMC”).  Under the terms of the sale agreements, we retained certain liabilities relating to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the premises occupied by VMC as of the date of sale.  We recorded a liability for the estimated remediation costs related to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the VMC premises when it was sold.  The accrued environmental liability at June 30, 2008 is $1.1 million, of which $322,000 is expected to be paid within one year.
        Fiscal Year 
  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
          
Net sales $893  $120  $6,422 
             
Income (loss) from discontinued            
operations before income taxes $(5,928) $(3,861) $(6,041)
Income tax (benefit)  (1,107)  (1,353)  (2,173)
Income (loss) from            
discontinued operations $(4,821) $(2,508) $(3,868)

3.         Company Sale Transaction

On March 2, 2007, we entered into an agreement to be acquired by investment entities affiliated with General Atlantic LLC and Francisco Partners II, L.P. (“GA” and “Francisco”). The agreement contained a provision under which we were permitted to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties through April 18, 2007.  In the event we accepted a superior proposal received prior to April 19, 2007, a breakup fee of $15 million plus up to $7.5 million of expenses would be payable by the Company. On May 25, 2007, upon entering into the merger agreement described below, we provided a letter of termination to affiliates of GA and Francisco that the merger with them was terminated (“Terminated Merger”).  In connection with such termination, we paid a $22.5 million breakup fee, as we determined that the acquisition proposal, that resulted in the merger agreement, constituted a superior proposal.

On June 4, 2007, an affiliate of GA and Francisco filed an action against us alleging, among other things, that we breached the terminated merger agreement by paying GA and Francisco a breakup fee of $22.5 million instead of $37.5 million (a $30.0 million termination fee plus reimbursement of $7.5 million in expenses) that GA and Francisco contended they were owed. We settled this action for $2.5 million in January 2008, which is reflected in the results of operations for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007.

F-13

On August 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by and merged with AX Acquisition Corp. (“AX Acquisition”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AX Holding Corp. (the “Parent”), (the “Merger”).  Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and each share of common stock of the Company then outstanding was converted into a right to receive $14.50 in cash. Therefore, on August 15, 2007 each holder of shares of our common stock no longer had any rights with respect to the shares, except for the right to receive the merger consideration. The merger agreement also provided that all of our stock options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment equal to the number of shares of our common stock underlying the options multiplied by the amount, if any, by which $14.50 exceeded the exercise price of the option, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. The aggregate merger consideration paid to our shareholders and stock option holders was approximately $1.1 billion.

The Merger was funded by a $378.4 million equity investment in Parent by Veritas, Golden Gate and GS Direct (collectively, the “Sponsors”) and certain members of our management.  In addition, primarily in order to finance the Merger, on August 15, 2007 the Company entered into a $575 million senior secured credit facility, which consisted of $525 million of term loans and a $50 million revolving credit facility, and two exchangeable senior unsecured credit facilities totaling $345 million (see Note 9)11).

F-15

Upon the closing of the Merger, we paid severance of approximately $6.7 million, $18.6 million of Merger transaction expenses, a $22 million advisory fee to the Sponsors or their affiliates and $18.3 million in financing costs.

Upon consummation of the Merger, we entered into a new employment agreement with one of our officers that, in addition to specified annual remuneration and bonuses, provided for a one-time bonus of $887,000 which was recorded as compensation expense in the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, plus $3.7 million for a covenant not to compete which is being amortized over the seven year term, both of which were paid in January 2008.

At the closing of the Merger, we entered into an advisory agreement with the Sponsors or their designated affiliates under which the Sponsors will provide certain advisory services to us.  We will pay an annual advisory fee in the aggregate amount of the greater of $2.2 million, or 1.8% of adjusted EBITDA for the prior fiscal year, as defined in the agreement, and transaction fees on all future financings and liquidity events. The advisory agreement has an initial term expiring on December 31, 2013 and will be automatically renewable for additional one year terms thereafter unless we or the Sponsors give notice of non-renewal.  The annual advisory fees paid amounted to $2.3 million and $2.1 million during the year ended June 30, 2009 and the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, respectively.

In connection with the Merger and Terminated Merger, for the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, we incurred company sale transaction and related expenses that we expensed as incurred of $32.5 million, $3.7 million and $30.6 million, respectively, consisting primarily of merger-related severance and other change of control related payments, a merger termination fee and the related lawsuit settlement charge and legal and other professional fees (“Company Sale Transaction expenses”).

Purchase Accounting
The Merger constituted a change in control of the Company. In accordance with GAAP, theThe Company recorded its assets and liabilities at fair value as of the date of the Merger, whereby the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Independent third-party appraisers were engaged to assist management and perform valuations of certain of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.

We allocated the purchase price, including the acquisition costs of approximately $22.9 million, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $45.5 million) $335,252 
Property, plant and equipment  111,804 
Other assets  16,537 
Developed technology  195,500 
Customer related intangible assets  211,582 
Other acquired intangible assets  6,290 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives (tradenames)  122,870 
Goodwill  452,756 
In-process research and development  24,340 
Total assets acquired  1,476,931 
Current liabilities  (137,751)
Long-term liabilities  (220,887)
Total liabilities assumed  (358,638)
Net assets acquired $1,118,293 
 
F-14F-16
 

  In thousands 
    
Current assets (excluding cash of $45.5 million) $335,252 
Property, plant and equipment  111,804 
Other assets  16,537 
Developed technology  195,500 
Customer related intangible assets  211,582 
Other acquired intangible assets  6,290 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives (tradenames)  122,870 
Goodwill  452,791 
In-process research and development  24,340 
   Total assets acquired  1,476,966 
Current liabilities  (137,751)
Long-term liabilities  (220,922)
   Total liabilities assumed  (358,673)
   Net assets acquired $1,118,293 

At the acquisition date, the acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D)(“IPR&D”) was not considered to have reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future uses. Therefore, the fair value of the IPR&D of $24.3 million was expensed at the time of the acquisition in operating costs. The allocation to in-process research and developmentIPR&D represents the estimated fair value of such incomplete research and development, at the acquisition date, based on future cash flows.  As of the acquisition date, cash flows from these projects were expected to commence in fiscal year 2009. In determining the fair values of IPR&D, risk adjusted discount rates that ranged from 17% to 25% were applied to the projects’ cash flows, which have taken into account the respective projects’ completion percentage.

The unaudited pro forma results of operations presented below for the period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 are presented as though the Merger had occurred on July 1, 2006, after giving effect to purchase accounting adjustments relating to depreciation and amortization of the revalued assets, interest expense associated with the new credit facilities and other acquisition-related adjustments in connection with the Merger and our acquisition of MicroMetrics (which was consummated on April 12, 2007) as if it occurred on July 1, 2006. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the combined results that would have occurred had the Merger and acquisition of MicroMetrics been consummated at July 1, 2006, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.

 Period from  Fiscal Year 
 Period from     July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
 July 1, 2007 to  Fiscal Year Ended  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
 August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007  Predecessor  Predecessor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
            
Net sales $38,178  $598,241  $38,178  $598,241 
Net income (loss) $(27,554) $(123,105) $(27,554) $(123,105)

4.         Acquisition of Businesses and Intangible Assets

Racal Instruments Wireless Solutions Group

On July 31, 2003, we acquired the Racal Instruments Wireless Solutions Group (“RIWS”) for cash of $38 million and a deferred payment of up to $16.5 million in either cash or Aeroflex common stock, at our option, depending on RIWS achieving certain performance goals for the year ending July 31, 2004. In October 2006, a final determination of the deferred payment was made requiring us to pay $9.2 million, which we paid in cash and recorded as an increase to goodwill. We did not include this contingent consideration in any previously issued balance sheet as the payment of this consideration was not considered to be certain beyond a reasonable doubt.


MicroMetrics, Inc.

On April 12, 2007, we purchased the outstanding stock of MicroMetrics, Inc. (“MMI”) for $9.9 million of cash and repaid approximately $700,000 of MMI’s bank debt.  MMI, located in New Hampshire, is a design and full service manufacturer of both standard and application specific RF/Microwave diodes and semiconductor devices. MMI strengthens our high-reliability, high-performance RF/Microwave product portfolio of semiconductor solutions.  MMI is included in our Microelectronic Solutions segment.

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $72,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $9,000) $3,250  $3,250 
Property, plant and equipment 1,147  1,147 
Customer related intangibles 2,600 
Non-compete arrangements 590 
Tradenames 70  70 
Customer related intangibles 3,190 
Goodwill  4,633   4,633 
Total assets acquired  12,290   12,290 
Current liabilities (1,619) (1,619)
Long term debt  (8)  (8)
Total liabilities assumed  (1,627)  (1,627)
Net assets acquired $10,663  $10,663 
 
The customer related intangibles and tradenamesnon-compete arrangements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 12 to 9.5 years.  The tradenames have an indefinite life.  The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

The operating results of MMI have been included in the consolidated statements of operations and the Microelectronics segment from the acquisition date.  On a pro forma basis, had the MMI acquisition taken place as of the beginning of fiscal 2007,the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Test Evolution Corporation

On October 1, 2007, we purchased 40% of the outstanding stock of Test Evolution Corporation (“TEC”) for $4.0 million ($2.0 million at closing and $2.0 million to be paid at a later date)in October 2008). TEC, located in Massachusetts, develops and manufactures digital, analog and RF semiconductor automated test equipment. We have determined that we have control of this company and have consolidated TEC’s assets and liabilities and results of operations, all of which were insignificant, into our financial statements commencing October 1, 2007. The non-controlling interest of 60% in each of the equity and operations of TEC are not material to our consolidated financial statements and have been included in other long-term liabilities and other income (expense), respectively.  TEC is included in our ATSTest Solutions segment.

Gaisler Research AB

On June 30, 2008, we acquired the stock of Gaisler Research AB (“Gaisler”) for $12.7$12.3 million cash (net of $2.7 million cash acquired), plus up to another $15 million over the next three years provided specified EBITDA targets are achieved. Gaisler achieved the fiscal year 2009 EBITDA target, and as such, an additional $4 million will be paid to the selling shareholders in October 2009, which has been added to goodwill in the accompanying June 30, 2009 consolidated balance sheet. Located in Sweden, Gaisler provides integrated circuit software products and services to European space system suppliers, plus other U.S., Japanese and Russian space agencies. Gaisler is included in our AMSMicroelectronic Solutions segment.

We preliminarily allocated the purchase price, including the $4 million of earned contingent consideration and acquisition costs of approximately $359,000,$432,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
 

  In thousands 
    
Current assets (excluding cash of $2.7 million) $987 
Property, plant and equipment  62 
Developed technology  2,920 
Customer related intangibles  1,650 
Tradenames  508 
Goodwill  8,261 
In-process research and development  635 
   Total assets acquired  15,023 
Current liabilities  (1,076)
Deferred taxes  (1,280)
   Total liabilities assumed  (2,356)
   Net assets acquired $12,667 

As of June 30, 2008, we are in the process of completing our assessment of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities as of the date of acquisition which is expected to be finalized upon the receipt and completion of additional information and analysis during fiscal 2009.
  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $2.7 million) $987 
Property, plant and equipment  62 
Developed technology  7,550 
Customer related intangibles  1,030 
Non-compete arrangements  1,820 
Tradenames  1,190 
Goodwill  6,122 
In-process research and development  2,300 
Total assets acquired  21,061 
Current liabilities  (1,076)
Deferred taxes  (3,245)
Total liabilities assumed  (4,321)
Net assets acquired $16,740 

The developed technology, customer related intangibles, non-compete arrangements, and developed technologytradenames are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 78 years.  The goodwill is not  deductible for tax purposes.


F-18
On a pro forma basis, had the Gaisler acquisition taken place as of the beginning of fiscal 2007,the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

VI Technology, Inc.

On March 4, 2009, we acquired 100% of the stock of VI Technology, Inc. (“VI Tech”).  We paid $5.0 million in cash for approximately 29% of the stock of VI Tech, and the remaining approximately 71% of VI Tech stock was acquired by a limited liability company (“parent LLC”), that is our ultimate parent, in exchange for Class A membership interests in parent LLC with a fair value of $12.7 million.  Immediately following the consummation of these transactions, parent LLC contributed the 71% of VI Tech stock to the Company, giving us 100% ownership in VI Tech.  VI Tech, located in Austin, Texas, designs and manufactures independent automated test systems.  VI Tech is included in our Test Solutions segment.

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $407,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $107,000) $3,022 
Property, plant and equipment  149 
Other assets  37 
Developed technology  2,990 
Customer related intangibles  4,470 
Non-compete arrangements  1,600 
Tradenames  1,190 
Goodwill  10,501 
Total assets acquired  23,959 
Current liabilities  (1,878)
Deferred taxes  (4,081)
Total liabilities assumed  (5,959)
Net assets acquired $18,000 

The developed technology, customer related intangibles, non-compete arrangements, and tradenames are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 6 years.  The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

On a pro forma basis, had the VI Tech acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Airflyte Electronics Company

On June 26, 2009, we acquired the net assets of Airflyte Electronics Company (“Airflyte”) for $11.0 million cash plus up to another $3 million provided specified EBITDA targets are achieved in fiscal 2010.  Airflyte, located in Naples, Florida, designs and manufactures custom-engineered slip rings for high-performance defense, commercial and industrial applications. Airflyte is included in our Microelectronic Solutions segment.

F-19

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $270,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets $4,724 
Property, plant and equipment  76 
Other assets  47 
Customer related intangibles  4,020 
Tradenames  1,200 
Goodwill  1,758 
Total assets acquired  11,825 
Current liabilities assumed  (555)
Net assets acquired $11,270 

The customer related intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 6 years.  The tradenames have an indefinite life.  The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

On a pro forma basis, had the Airflyte acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Intangible Assets with Definite Lives

The components of amortizable intangible assets are as follows:

 June 30, 2008  June 30, 2007  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008 
 (Successor)  (Predecessor)  (Successor)  (Successor) 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                        
 Gross     Gross     Gross     Gross    
 Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying  Accumulated 
 Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amortization 
                        
Developed technology $198,420  $29,631  $87,931  $47,403  $197,684  $62,021  $198,420  $29,631 
Customer related intangibles 213,232  42,433  12,161  5,915  216,956  69,339  213,232  42,433 
Non-compete arrangements  6,290   1,012   -   -  10,090  2,692  6,290  1,012 
Tradenames  2,105   230   -   - 
Total $417,942  $73,076  $100,092  $53,318  $426,835  $134,282  $417,942  $73,076 

The aggregate amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets was $63.0 million, $73.1 million, $1.7 million and $13.0 million and $13.8 millionfor the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, for the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years ending June 30, is as follows:

  (In thousands) 
    
2010 $61,949 
2011  60,748 
2012  60,479 
2013  54,525 
2014  27,833 
Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives

  (In thousands) 
    
2009 $63,475 
2010  59,385 
2011  58,987 
2012  58,718 
2013  52,424 
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual impairment test of indefinite lived intangible assets and, due to a decline in the Radar Frequency Microwave reporting unit’s (“RFMW”)  operating results during fiscal 2009 and additional revisions to internal forecasts, we wrote-off approximately $6.0 million of tradenames with indefinite lives related to the RFMW reporting unit.

Goodwill

The carrying amount of goodwill is as follows:

 AMS  ATS  Total  AMS  ATS  Total 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                  
Balance at July 1, 2006 (predecessor entity) $46,688  $115,778  $162,466 
Acquisition of MicroMetrics  4,633   -  4,633 
Final determination of RIWS acquisition earnout            
payment  -   9,247  9,247 
Adjustment (1)  -   (1,740) (1,740)
Impact of foreign currency translation  -   7,356   7,356 
Balance at June 30, 2007 (predecessor entity)  51,321   130,641  181,962  $51,321  $130,641  $181,962 
Goodwill adjustment recorded in purchase                        
accounting from allocation of purchase price (2)  243,456   27,373   270,829 
accounting from allocation of purchase price (1)
  243,456   27,373   270,829 
Balance at August 15, 2007 (successor entity) 294,777  158,014  452,791   294,777   158,014   452,791 
Acquisition of Test Evolution Corporation -  1,868  1,868   -   1,868   1,868 
Acquisition of Gaisler Research, AB 8,261  -  8,261 
Acquisition of Gaisler  8,261   -   8,261 
Impact of foreign currency translation  (268)  (1,497)  (1,765)  (268)  (1,497)  (1,765)
Balance at June 30, 2008 (successor entity) $302,770  $158,385  $461,155   302,770   158,385   461,155 
Final adjustment to goodwill related to the Merger  494   (529)  (35)
Adjustment to goodwill for acquisitions (2)
  (4,206)  10,501   6,295 
Gaisler 2009 earned contingent consideration  4,000   -   4,000 
Impairment of goodwill  (35,200)  -   (35,200)
Impact of foreign currency translation  (1,045)  (7,037)  (8,082)
Balance at June 30, 2009 (successor entity) $266,813  $161,320  $428,133 

(1) These adjustments to goodwill are primarily the result of the tax adjustments pertaining to pre-acquisition tax periods related to the acquisitions of Aeroflex International Ltd. and RIWS.

(2) (1)The predecessor entity goodwill has been written off in purchase accounting for the Merger.
(2)Goodwill in the AMS segment was adjusted primarily due to the finalization of purchase accounting for the Gaisler acquisition in the amount of $(6.2) million offset by goodwill recorded for the Airflyte acquisition of $1.8 million. Goodwill in the ATS segment was adjusted due to purchase accounting for the VI Tech acquisition in the amount of $10.5 million.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual impairment test of goodwill and, due to a decline in the RFMW reporting unit’s operating results and additional revisions to internal forecasts during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge related to the RFMW reporting unit of $35.2 million.

5.      Restructuring Charges

In fiscal 2006, we initiated steps to consolidate our three Test Solutions businesses in the United Kingdom.  Pursuant to the plan, our manufacturing operations were moved into one facility and we created a shared-services environment for all finance and administrative functions.  In connection with this plan, approximately 40 employees were terminated and certain contract positions were eliminated.  In fiscal 2006, we recorded charges of $3.2 million primarily for workforce reductions in all departments.  During fiscal 2007, we recorded an additional charge of $100,000 for these workforce reductions.   The workforce restructuring charges were allocated solely to general and administrative costs.

In fiscal 2007, we initiated and completed restructuring activity in the Wireless division of our Test Solutions businesses in the United Kingdom.  Pursuant to the plan, 23 employees were terminated, resulting in $1.4 million of severance costs, and certain contract positions were eliminated.  We also abandoned a leased facility and recorded a fixed asset impairment charge, which in the aggregate amounted to $1.3 million.  During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, we recorded approximately $2.8 million in restructuring costs including the write-off of $753,000 of net fixed assets, all in research and development costs except for $35,000 allocated to selling, general and administrative costs, and all of which was paid as of June 30, 2007.


In fiscal 2008, we initiated additional actions to restructure our United KingdomU.K. business units by further consolidating our manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative activities. In addition, we initiated a restructuring in our Whippany, New Jersey, component manufacturing facility to address a slowdown in sales of its integrated products line.  These actions resulted in the termination of approximately 120 employees, which resulted in restructuring costs, principally severance, for the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 of $6.5$7.0 million ($0.9 million987,000 in cost of sales, $2.1 million in selling, general and administrative costs and $3.9 million in research and development costs) and $3.8 million ($1.6 million in selling, general and administrative costs and $2.2 million in research and development costs), respectively. Substantially all of the workforce reduction costs were paid prior to June 30, 2008. Other restructuring chargesFacility closure costs include $2.6 million of accrued contractual commitments under operating leases for two facilities in the U.K. that we exited in May 2008, which will be paid through December 2010. In addition,Included in the restructuring costs was approximately $485,000 of fixed asset impairment charges that were recorded in selling, general and administrative costs in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 for the write-off of leasehold improvements in the abandoned facilities.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, in connection with continued restructuring activities of certain manufacturing operations, we incurred $3.8 million of severance costs for an additional 103 employees terminated primarily in our U.K. business unit and $294,000 of facility closure costs ($2.9 million in cost of sales, $686,000 in selling, general and administrative costs and $496,000 in research and development costs).

The following table sets forth the charges and payments related to the restructuring liability for the periods indicated:

     Year Ended June 30, 2008       
  Balance  July 1,  August 15,  July 1,  August 15,     Balance 
   June 30,  2007 to  2007 to  2007 to  2007 to     June 30, 
   2007  August 14,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30,  Effect of  2008 
   Restructuring  2007  2008  2007  2008  foreign  Restructuring 
  Liability  Net Additions  Cash Payments  currency  Liability 
      Predecessor  Successor  Predecessor  Successor       
        (In thousands)          
Work force                     
   reduction $-  $3,778  $3,270  $(1,186) $(5,850) $-  $12 
                             
Other  -   -   3,230   -   -   12   3,242 
Total $-  $3,778  $6,500  $(1,186) $(5,850) $12  $3,254 
  Balance           Balance 
  June 30,     June 30, 
  
2008
  
Year Ended June 30, 2009
  
2009
 
     (Successor)    
           Effect of    
  Restructuring        foreign  Restructuring 
  
Liability
  
Net Additions
  
Cash Payments
  
currency
  
Liability
 
  (In thousands) 
Work force               
reduction $12  $3,808  $(3,092) $28  $756 
                     
Closure of                    
facilities  3,242   294   (1,166)  (648)  1,722 
                     
Total $3,254  $4,102  $(4,258) $(620) $2,478 

     
Year Ended June 30, 20 08
       
  Balance  July 1,  August 15,  July 1,  August 15,     Balance 
  June 30,  2007 to  2007 to  2007 to  2007 to     June 30, 
  
2007
  August 14,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30,  Effect of  
2008
 
  Restructuring  2007  2008  2007  2008  foreign  Restructuring 
  
Liability
  
Net Additions
  
Cash Payments
  
currency
  
Liability
 
     
Predecessor
  
Successor
  
Predecessor
  
Successor
       
        (In thousands)          
Work force                     
reduction $-  $3,778  $3,270  $(1,186) $(5,850) $-  $12 
                             
Closure of                            
facilities  -   -   3,230   -   -   12   3,242 
                             
Total $-  $3,778  $6,500  $(1,186) $(5,850) $12  $3,254 
 

6. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

 June 30,  June 30, 
 June 30,  June 30,  2009  2008 
 2008  2007  Successor  Successor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
            
Raw materials $64,533  $65,006  $67,388  $64,533 
Work in process 41,056  50,485  47,185  41,056 
Finished goods  29,302   24,366   21,030   29,302 
 $134,891  $139,857  $135,603  $134,891 

7. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

 June 30, Estimated
 June 30, Estimated 2009  2008 Useful Life
 2008  2007 Useful Life Successor  Successor In Years
 (In thousands) In Years (In thousands)  
              
Land $17,120  $12,078   $16,846  $17,120  
Buildings and leasehold improvements 30,303  34,629 1 to 40 32,461  31,541 1 to 40
Machinery and equipment 64,304  120,877 2 to 10 79,836  63,469 2 to 12
Furniture and fixtures 12,925  20,192 1 to 10  13,836   12,925 2 to 10
Assets recorded under capital leases  403   6,110 2 to 30
 125,055  193,886   142,979  125,055  
Less accumulated depreciation and         
amortization  20,406   112,474  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  42,072   20,406  
 $104,649  $81,412   $100,907  $104,649  

Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment was $21.4 million, $20.0 million, $2.0 million and $17.0 million for the periodfiscal year ended June 30, 2009, for the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 $2.0 million for the periodand July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $17.0 million and $16.6 million for the yearsfiscal year ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

8.        Product Warranty
We warrant our products against defects in design, materials and workmanship, generally for one year from their date of shipment. A provision for estimated future costs relating to these warranties is recorded when the related revenue is recognized and is included in cost of sales. Quarterly we analyze our warranty liability for reasonableness based on a 15-month history of warranty costs incurred, the nature of the products shipped subject to warranty and anticipated warranty trends.

Activity related to our product warranty liability, which is reflected in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, was as follows:

  Fiscal Year       
   Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to 
   June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007 
   Successor  Successor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
          
Balance at beginning of period $2,944  $3,002  $2,929 
Provision for warranty obligations  3,081   2,192   469 
Cost of warranty obligations  (3,207)  (2,259)  (394)
Foreign currency impact  (173)  9   (2)
Balance at end of period $2,645  $2,944  $3,002 

9.        Derivative Financial Instruments

We adopted SFAS No. 161 “Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” as of January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements as it is a disclosure-only standard. We address certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. We enter into interest rate swap derivatives to manage the effects of interest rate movements on portions of our debt. We also enter into foreign currency forward contracts, not designated as hedging instruments, to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates.

The fair values of our derivative financial instruments included in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 are presented as follows:

  Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives 
  Balance Sheet   Balance Sheet   
(In thousands) Location 
Fair Value(1)
 Location 
Fair Value(1)
 
Derivatives designated as hedging         
   instruments:         
   Interest rate swap contracts     Other long-term   
  Not applicable $-    liabilities $15,621 
            
Derivatives not designated as hedging           
   instruments:           
   Foreign currency forward contracts      Accrued expenses and    
  Not applicable  -    other current liabilities  195 
            
          Total Derivatives   $-   $15,816 
(1) See Note 10 for further information about how the fair values of derivative assets and liabilities are determined.
The amounts of the gains and losses related to our derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:

    Location of Gain or (Loss) Amount of Gain or (Loss) 
  Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Reclassified from 
  Recognized in OCI on Derivative Accumulated OCI into Accumulated OCI into 
(In thousands) 
(Effective Portion) (1)
 Income (Effective Portion) Income (Effective Portion) 
  Fiscal Year   Fiscal Year 
Derivatives in Cash Flow Ended   Ended 
Hedging Relationships June 30, 2009   June 30, 2009 
        
Interest rate swap contracts $(17,862) Interest expense $(7,061) 

(1)  See Note 13 for additional information on changes to other accumulated comprehensive income (loss).

The amounts of the gains and losses related to our derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:

  Location of Gain or (Loss) Amount of Gain or (Loss) 
  Recognized in Earnings on Recognized in Earnings on 
(In thousands) Derivative Derivative 
    Fiscal Year 
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging   Ended 
Instruments:   June 30, 2009 
      
Foreign currency forward contracts Other income (expense) $(208) 

Interest Rate Swap Cash-Flow Hedges

We enter into interest rate swap contracts to manage the effects of interest rate movements on portions of our debt. Such contracts effectively fix the borrowing rates on floating rate debt to limit the exposure against the risk of rising rates.  We do not enter into interest rate swap contracts for speculative purposes and we have entered into transactions with counterparties that are rated investment grade. Our interest rate swap contracts, all of which were entered into in fiscal 2008 for an aggregate notional amount of $475 million, have varying maturities through February 2011.

Foreign Currency Contract Derivatives

Foreign currency contracts are used to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates. We enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges. The change in fair value is included in income as it occurs, within other income (expense). As of June 30, 2009, we had $30.0 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through July 31, 2009. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of the Company, but are used in the calculation of cash settlements under the contracts.

10.     Fair Value Measurements

We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities as of July 1, 2008 and, as of June 30, 2009, have recorded a $2.3 million valuation allowance against the cost of our auction rate securities.  SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

F-25
 
SFAS 157 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1:Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level 2:Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3:Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.  The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instruments valuation.

The following table presents for each hierarchy level, financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009:

  Quoted Prices in          
  Active Markets  Significant Other  Significant    
  for Identical  Observable  Unobservable    
  Assets  Inputs  Inputs    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Assets:            
Non-current marketable securities $-  $-  $17,677  $17,677 
Liabilities:                
Foreign currency forward                
contracts $-  $195  $-  $195 
Interest rate swap contracts  -   15,621   -   15,621 
Total Liabilities $-  $15,816  $-  $15,816 

The following table presents the changes in the carrying value of the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), as defined in SFAS No. 157, for the year ended June 30, 2009:

        Fiscal Year 
   August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
   June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
   Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
               
Balance at beginning of period $3,002  $2,929  $2,536 
Provision for warranty obligations  2,192   469   3,734 
Cost of warranty obligations  (2,259)  (394)  (3,405)
Foreign currency impact  9   (2)  64 
Balance at end of period $2,944  $3,002  $2,929 
  Fair Value Measurements 
  Using Significant 
  Unobservable Inputs 
  (Level 3) 
  Auction 
  Rate 
  Securities 
  (In thousands) 
    
Balance at June 30, 2008 $- 
Transfers to Level 3  19,945 
Total unrealized losses in accumulated    
other comprehensive income (loss)  (2,268)
Balance at June 30, 2009 $17,677 

F-26

Non-Current Marketable Securities – Non-current marketable securities consist of auction rate securities that currently have no active market from which we could obtain pricing.  Since we adopted SFAS 157 on July 1, 2008, auction rate securities have been classified as Level 3 as their valuation requires substantial judgment and estimation of factors that are not currently observable in the market due to the lack of trading in the securities.  Since February 2008, when auctions for these securities began to fail, we have redeemed $27.5 million of auction rate securities at par, including $1.0 million owned at June 30, 2009, which were redeemed at par in July 2009. The $1.0 million redeemed in July 2009 are classified as non-current marketable securities as of June 30, 2009, as we were not aware at the balance sheet date that these auction rate securities would be redeemed.  To date, we have collected all interest payments on all of our auction rate securities when due. Furthermore, we have the intent and are able to hold these securities until the credit markets recover, or until their maturities, which range from 2029 through 2042, if necessary.   However, based on a discounted cash flow analysis, which considered, among other items, the collateral underlying the securities, the credit worthiness of the issuer, the timing of future cash flows and liquidity risks, we have recorded a $2.3 million valuation allowance against the auction rate securities.

9.Foreign Currency Forward Contracts – The fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts were valued using a pricing model with all significant inputs based on observable market data such as measurement date spot and forward rates.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts – The fair value of our outstanding interest rate swap contracts were based on valuations received from the counterparties and corroborated by measurement date equivalent swap rates.

11.        Long Term Debt and Credit Agreements

On August 15, 2007, we entered into a $575 million senior secured credit facility, which consisted of $525 million of term loans and a $50 million revolving credit facility, and two exchangeable senior unsecured credit facilities totaling $345 million.  Total long term debt, outstanding as of June 30, 20082009 and 2007,2008, consists of the following:

  June 30, 2008  June 30, 2007   June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008 
  (In thousands)   Successor  Successor 
         (In thousands) 
Revolving credit facility(a) $-  $- (a) $-  $- 
Senior secured B-1 term loan(b) 397,000  - (b)  393,000   397,000 
Senior secured B-2 term loan(c)  124,063   - (c)  122,813   124,063 
Total senior secured debt  521,063  -    515,813   521,063 
Exchangeable senior unsecured loan(d) 225,000  - 
Senior unsecured notes(d)  225,000   225,000 
Senior subordinated unsecured term loan(e) 131,340  - (e)  147,450   131,340 
Other   1,408   3,583    1,085   1,408 
Total Debt  878,811  3,583 
Less Current Maturities   5,574   2,164 
Total Long Term Debt  $873,237  $1,419 
Total debt   889,348   878,811 
Less current maturities   5,590   5,574 
Total long term debt  $883,758  $873,237 

The following is a summary of required principal repayments of long-termour debt for the next five years and thereafter as of June 30, 2008:2009:

Year ending June 30, (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
2009 $5,574 
2010 5,590  $5,590 
2011 5,610  5,610 
2012 5,635  5,635 
2013 5,250  5,250 
2014 5,250 
Thereafter  851,152   862,013 
 $878,811  $889,348 

 (a)The revolving credit facility provides for borrowings of up to $50 million through August 15, 2013 at a rate based on the LIBOR rate (3 month period) plus 325 basis points (6.04%(4.125% at June 30, 2008)2009). The senior secured credit facility allows us to utilize up to $25 million of the revolving credit facility for letters of credit and up to $5 million for a swing loan.  At June 30, 2008,2009, there are no outstanding amounts or letters of credit issued against the facility.  Any borrowings would be secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.  We are obligated to pay a 0.5% fee on any undrawn revolver commitments.

 
F-21F-27
 

 (b)The B-1 term loan in the original amount of $400 million matures on August 15, 2014 and bears interest at a rate based on the selected LIBOR rate.  At June 30, 2009, $375 million is at the 3 month LIBOR rate (3 month period) plus 325 basis points (5.94%(4.125% at June 30, 2008)2009) and $18 million is at the 1 month LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points (3.625% at June 30, 2009). The B-1 term loan has scheduled quarterly repayments of $1 million that commenced December 31, 2007 and continue through June 30, 2014, with $373 million due on August 15, 2014.  The borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, excluding those of our foreign subsidiaries.

In October 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the last $125 million of this loan, which expires November 15, 2010, effectively fixing the interest rate on this portion of the loan at 8.21% for that period. In April 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for an additional $250 million which expires February 15, 2011, effectively fixing the interest rate on this portion of the loan at 6.23%.  After considering the swaps, the effective interest rate on the total amount outstanding under the B-1 term loan is 6.84%6.74% at June 30, 2008.2009.

 (c)The B-2 term loan in the original amount of $125 million matures on August 15, 2014 and bears interest at a rate based on the selected LIBOR rate.  At June 30, 2009, $100 million is at the 3 month LIBOR rate (3 month period) plus 375 basis points (6.44%(4.625% at June 30, 2008)2009) and $23 million is at the 1 month LIBOR rate plus 375 basis points (4.125% at June 30, 2009). The B-2 term loan has scheduled quarterly repayments of $312,500 that commenced December 31, 2007 and continue through June 30, 2014, with $116.6 million due on August 15, 2014.  The borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, excluding those of our foreign subsidiaries.

In April 2008, the Company entered into two additional$50 million interest rate swap agreements for $50 million expiringthat expire February 16, 2010 and February 15, 2011, effectively fixing the interest rate on the respective portions of the loan at 6.46% and 6.74%, respectively.  After considering the swaps, the effective interest rate on the total amount outstanding for the B-2 term loan is 6.57%6.14% at June 30, 2008.2009.

 (d)On August 7, 2008, theour 11.75% exchangeable senior unsecured loan in the amount of $225 million with an ultimate maturity on February 15, 2015 was refinanced with an unsecured senior notenotes with the same interest rate and maturity date.  We may prepay the senior notes commencing August 15, 2011 at 105.875% of the principal amount prepaid, which decreases to 102.938% on August 15, 2012 and to 100% on or after August 15, 2013.  In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal balance of the senior notes, at any time prior to August 15, 2010, with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings at 111.75% of the principal amount redeemed.  We have entered into an agreement to file anOn January 21, 2009, the SEC declared effective our exchange offer registration statement withwhich resulted in the SEC by February 3, 2009 to publicly register debt securities with similar terms toexchange of the unregistered unsecured senior notes and to use commercially reasonable efforts to have such registration statement declared effective on or prior to May 4, 2009.  If we fail to timely file the registration statement or it is not timely declared effective, then we will pay special interest on thefor publicly registered 11.75% unsecured senior notes equal to 0.25% ondue February 15, 2015 with substantially identical terms as the outstanding principal amount of the notes with respect to the first ninety days following the registration default event, which will increase by an additional 0.25% with respect to each subsequent ninety day period until all registration defaults have been cured, up to a maximum of 1%.exchanged notes.

 (e)The senior subordinated unsecured term loan in the original amount of $120 million bears interest at 11.75% and matures on February 15, 2015.  On September 21, 2007 we repaid an exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured loan with the proceeds from this term loan.  Interest on the loan is payable entirely by adding such interest to the unpaid principal amount of the loan through August 15, 2010, which through June 30, 20082009 amounted to $11.3$27.5 million. Subsequent to August 15, 2010 interest on the term loan is payable in cash.   We may prepay the term loan commencing August 15, 2011 at 105.875% of the principal amount prepaid, which decreases to 102.9375% on August 15, 2012 and to 100% on or after August 15, 2013.

 
F-22F-28
 

The senior secured credit facility agreement provides that if the Company sells assets (with certain exceptions, including the sale of the Radar business)exceptions) or issues new debt or equity securities to unrelated parties, the proceeds must be used to prepay term or revolving credit loans.  If such a prepayment event occurs, or the term loans are voluntarily prepaid, prior to August 15, 2009, a prepayment premium of 1% must be paid on the amount of the B-2 term loans repaid.  In addition, commencing October 1, 2008, to the extent we have consolidated excess cash flows, as defined in the senior secured credit agreement, we must use specified portions of the excess cash flows to prepay senior secured debt.

Financial covenants in the senior secured credit facility consist of a maximum leverage ratio of total debt (less up to $15 million of cash) to adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, and maximum consolidated capital expenditures. Additional covenants include restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, dividends, disposition of assets, acquisitions and transactions with shareholders and affiliates.

The senior unsecured notes and loan agreements have similar terms to the senior secured credit facility regarding mandatory prepayment events and restrictive covenants and contain no financial covenants.

As of June 30, 2008,2009, we are in compliance with all of the covenants contained in the above described loan agreements.

In connection with the credit facilities discussed above, we capitalized deferred financing costs of  $340,000, $33.2 million and $477,000 for the periodyear ended June 30, 2009 and the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, respectively, primarily consisting of facility, legal and advisory fees.  We are amortizing these costs over the terms of the related facilities.  For the periodyear ended June 30, 2009 and the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, we amortized $4.8 million, $3.5 million and $217,000, respectively, to interest expense.

Interest paid was $52.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2009, $53.9 million for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, $57,000 for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $674,000 and $597,000 for the yearsyear ended June 30, 20072007.

Accrued interest of $14.0 million and 2006,$4.5 million was included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The fair value of our debt instruments are summarized as follows:

 June 30, 2008  June 30, 2009 
 Carrying  Estimated  Carrying  Estimated 
 Amount  Fair Value  Amount  Fair Value 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
            
Senior secured B-1 term loan $397,000  $376,158  $393,000  $314,400 
Senior secured B-2 term loan 124,063  114,758   122,813   84,741 
Exchangeable senior unsecured loan 225,000  200,250 
Senior unsecured notes  225,000   173,250 
Senior subordinated unsecured term loan 131,340  111,639   147,450   88,470 
Other  1,408   1,408   1,085   1,085 
Total debt $878,811  $804,213  $889,348  $661,946 

The carrying value of debt of $3.6$878.8 million as of June 30, 2007 approximated2008 had a fair value.value of $804.2 million.

F-29

The estimated fair values of each of our debt instruments are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. Fair value estimates related to our debt instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information.  These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgments and therefore cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

F-23
10.           Stockholders’12.           Stockholder’s Equity

Stock Repurchase Program

During fiscal 2005, our then Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program.  During fiscal 2007, and 2006, a total of 1,753,838 and 35,000 shares respectively, were repurchased for $17.2 million and $402,000, respectively, and retired.

Share Based Compensation
 
Stock Options

All of our Predecessor Entity stock option plans were terminated on August 15, 2007. The mergerMerger agreement provided that all stock options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment equal to the number of shares of our common stock underlying the options multiplied by that amount, if any, by which $14.50 exceeded the exercise price, without interest and less any withholding taxes.  On August 15, 2007 the Companywe paid $43.9 million to option holders to cancel all options outstanding in connection with the Merger.

Under our stock option plans that were in effect until August 15, 2007, the exercise period for all stock options did not exceed ten years from the date of grant.  Stock option grants to individuals generally became exercisable in substantially equal tranches over a service period of up to five years and the exercise price was equal to the market value of the common stock at the grant date for all plans.  We have elected to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Our stock option plans allowed employees to use shares received from the exercise of options only to satisfy the minimum tax withholding requirements.  During the fiscal yearsyear 2007 and 2006 no payroll taxes on stock option exercises were withheld from employees in shares of the Company’s common stock.  In fiscal 2007, one employee tendered 55,951 previously owned common shares upon the exercise of options to pay for the exercise price.

The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted for the yearsyear ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $7.96 and $8.86, respectively.$7.96.  The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the yearsyear ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $9.0 million and $3.6 million, respectively.million.

The fair value of each share option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table.  Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our shares using daily price observations over a period consistent with the expected life.  Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.

We used the Securities and Exchange Commission’s safe harbor guidance in SAB 107 (the average of the vesting period and the option term) to estimate the expected life of options granted during fiscal 2007 and 2006.2007.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods similar to the expected life of the option.

F-30

  Years Ended June 30, 
  2007  2006 
       
Weighted average expected stock price volatility  66%  92%
Weighted average expected option life 5.5 years  6.1 years 
Average risk free interest rate  4.6%  4.5%
Average dividend yield  -   - 
Discount for post-vesting restrictions  N/A   N/A 
F-24
Year Ended June 30,
2007
Weighted average expected stock price volatility66%
Weighted average expected option life5.5 years
Average risk free interest rate4.6%
Average dividend yield-
Discount for post-vesting restrictionsN/A
 
Member Interests

On August 15, 2007 certain members of our management were granted Class B member interests in a limited liability company (parent LLC) that is the ultimate parent of the Company, and which owns all of the common stock of the Parent. The parent LLC is a holding company with no operations or employees of its own. The parent LLC has two classes of membership interests. Theinterests, Class A members include the Sponsorsand Class B. Our non-management equity investors, or their affiliates, and Company employees that made equity investments to partially fund the Merger andare Class A members.  In addition, the former shareholders of VI Tech (see Note 4) are also Class A members.  Class B members consist of certain Company employees. Pursuant to the terms of the limited liability company operating agreement governing the parent LLC, the holders of Class B member interests are entitled to receive a percentage of all distributions, if any, made by the parent LLC after (x) the holders of the Class A membersmember interests in the parent LLC have received a return of their invested capital, plus a 12% per annum internal rate of return (compounded annually) on their invested capital and (y) certain members of our management that received Class A interests for their capital contributions have received a special distribution in the aggregate amount of $3.2 million, together with a 12% per annum internal rate of return (compounded annually). The Class B member interests are non-transferable and vest ratably over five years, with any unvested interests reverting to the holders of Class A interests in the event they are forfeited or repurchased. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” and FSP FAS No. 123(R)-4, “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event”, the Class B members interests are equity classified awards and, therefore, the $9.8 million fair value of the Class B members’ interests at the grant date is being recorded as compensation expense over the respective five year vesting period,periods, which amounted to $2.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 and $1.7 million for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008. In addition, since the Class A employee members that made equity investments to partially fund the Merger paid less than fair value for their Class A member interests, as only they are entitled to the $3.2 million special distribution and there is no vesting associated with the special distribution, the present value of the discount from fair value of $1.4 million was recorded by the Company as compensation expense on August 15, 2007.  The accretion of $252,000 and $193,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, respectively, was recorded as interest expense.

Compensation expense attributable to share based compensation was $2.0 million ($1.2 million after tax) for the year ended June 30, 2009, $3.1 million ($2.0 million after tax) for the successor period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, $214,000 ($135,000 after tax) for the predecessor period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $4.1 million ($2.6 million after tax) and $6.8 million ($4.2 million after tax) for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.2007.

F-31

A summary of the changes to outstanding stock options from July 1, 2007 to August 15, 2007 is presented below:

     Weighted 
     Average 
     Exercise 
  Shares  Price 
  (In thousands)    
       
Outstanding at June 30, 2007  13,003  $12.37 
Granted  -   - 
Forfeited  (27)  19.30 
Expired  -   - 
Exercised  (51)  11.39 
Cancelled  (3,825)  18.74 
Paid out on Merger  (9,100)  9.68 
Outstanding at August 15, 2007  -     
 
As no stock options were granted fromsince August 15, 2007, to June 30, 2008, there are also no stock options outstanding at June 30, 2008.2009.

Cash received from stock option exercises was none for the successor period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, $583,000 for the predecessor period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $14.2 million and $4.6 million for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.2007.  The tax benefit received from stock option exercises was $16.1 million for the successor period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, $41,000 for the predecessor period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $3.3 million and $1.3 million for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.2007.

F-25
11.13.           Comprehensive Income
 
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

       Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
 August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended  Ended  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
 June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007  June 30, 2006  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
 Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                        
Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(16,916) $4,926  $26,959  $(76,688) $(105,425) $(16,916) $4,926 
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate                                
swap agreements, net of tax provision                
(benefit) of $829, $0, $3 and $37 1,411  -  5  63 
swap contracts, net of tax provision                
(benefit) of $(6,849), $829, $0 and $3  (11,013)  1,411   -   5 
Valuation allowance against                
non-current marketable securities  (2,268)  -   -   - 
Minimum pension liability adjustment                                
net of tax of $(4), $0, $(160) and $(349) (6) -  (267) (548)
net of tax of $(363), $(4), $0 and $(160)  (493)  (6)  -   (267)
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (998)  (497)  15,168   4,933   (41,333)  (998)  (497)  15,168 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $(105,018) $(17,413) $19,832  $31,407  $(131,795) $(105,018) $(17,413) $19,832 


F-32
 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:

 Unrealized           Unrealized             
 Gain (Loss)  Minimum        Gain (Loss)  Valuation  Minimum       
 on Interest  Pension  Foreign     on Interest  Allowance Against  Pension  Foreign    
 Rate Swap  Liability  Currency     Rate Swap  Non-Current  Liability  Currency    
 Agreements  Adjustment  Translation  Total  Contracts  Marketable  Adjustment  Translation  Total 
 (net of tax)  (net of tax)  Adjustment  (net of tax)  (net of tax)  Securities  (net of tax)  Adjustment  (net of tax) 
    (In thousands)     (In thousands) 
                           
Balance, June 30, 2005 $(75) $(3,632) $12,727  $9,020 
Annual change  63   (548)  4,933   4,448 
Balance June 30, 2006 (12) (4,180) 17,660  13,468 
Balance, June 30, 2006 $(12) $-  $(4,180) $17,660  $13,468 
Annual change 5  (267) 15,168  14,906   5   -   (267)  15,168   14,906 
Adjustment related to                                    
initial adoption of SFAS 158  -   (728)  -   (728)  -   -   (728)  -   (728)
Balance, June 30, 2007 (7) (5,175) 32,828  27,646   (7)  -   (5,175)  32,828   27,646 
Predecessor period -  -  (497) (497)  -   -   -   (497)  (497)
Adjustments for the effect                                    
of the Merger  7   5,175   (32,331)  (27,149)  7   -   5,175   (32,331)  (27,149)
 -  -  -  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Successor period  1,411   (6)  (998)  407   1,411   -   (6)  (998)  407 
Balance, June 30, 2008 $1,411  $(6) $(998) $407   1,411   -   (6)  (998)  407 
Annual change  (11,013)  (2,268)  (493)  (41,333)  (55,107)
Balance, June 30, 2009 $(9,602) $(2,268) $(499) $(42,331) $(54,700)

The foreign currency translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to indefinite investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.  The valuation allowance for non-current marketable securities is not adjusted for income taxes as it would create a capital loss carryforward upon realization for which we would record a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset.

F-26

12.           
14.Income Taxes

The amount of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes attributable to domestic and foreign operations are as follows:

       Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
 August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended  Ended  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
 June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007  June 30, 2006  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
 Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                        
Domestic $(134,861) $(10,199) $41,710  $59,898  $(110,168) $(134,861) $(10,199) $41,710 
                                
Foreign  (4,670)  (11,040)  (7,981)  (5,610)  18,148   (4,670)  (11,040)  (7,981)
 $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729  $54,288  $(92,020) $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729 


F-33
The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:

       Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
 August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended  Ended  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
 June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007  June 30, 2006  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
 Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                        
Current:                        
Federal $2,024  $(12,245) $28,800  $28,003  $49  $2,024  $(12,245) $28,800 
State and local  -  -  2,973  3,075   217   -   -   2,973 
Foreign  (121)  130   346   1,366   3,998   (121)  130   346 
  1,903   (12,115)  32,119   32,444   4,264   1,903   (12,115)  32,119 
                                
Deferred:                                
Federal  (40,355) 9,503  (4,356) (7,635)  (18,986)  (40,355)  9,503   (4,356)
State and local  (1,783) (1,256) (48) 105   2,882   (1,783)  (1,256)  (48)
Foreign  1,308   (2,963)  (2,780)  (4,374)  (3,492)  1,308   (2,963)  (2,780)
  (40,830)  5,284   (7,184)  (11,904)  (19,596)  (40,830)  5,284   (7,184)
 $(38,927) $(6,831) $24,935  $20,540  $(15,332) $(38,927) $(6,831) $24,935 

The provision for income taxes varies from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes as a result of the following:

  
Fiscal Year
Ended
  
August 15, 2007
to
  July 1, 2007 to  
Fiscal Year
Ended
 
  June 30, 2009  June 30 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Tax at federal statutory rate $(32,207) $(48,836) $(7,434) $11,805 
                 
Non-deductible acquired in-process research                
and development charge  665   8,744   -   - 
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries  8,138   -   -   - 
Foreign tax rate differential  (1,547)   (334)   664   (504) 
Foreign tax credits  (6,766)  -   -   - 
Increase in valuation allowance  6,190   5,420   237   2,772 
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit  2,735   (1,783)  (1,256)  1,951 
Impairment of goodwill  11,088   -   -   - 
Domestic manufacturing credit  -   (210)  -   (550)
Non-deductible merger expenses  403   5,861   1,111   10,704 
Research and development credit and deduction  (3,182)  (2,148)  (53)  (721)
Settlement of and change in tax contingencies  734   (3,416)  -   1,000 
Other, net  (1,583)  (2,225)  (100)  (1,522)
  $(15,332) $(38,927) $(6,831) $24,935 
 
F-27F-34
 
 
  
August 15, 2007
to
  July 1, 2007 to  
Fiscal Year
Ended
  
Fiscal Year
Ended
 
   June 30 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007  June 30, 2006 
   Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Tax at federal statutory rate $(48,836) $(7,434) $11,805  $19,001 
                 
Non-deductible acquired in-process research                
   and development charge  8,744   -   -   - 
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries  (1,265)  (184)  (1,342)  (1,306)
Increase in valuation allowance  5,420   237   2,772   546 
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit  (1,783)  (1,256)  1,951   2,105 
Domestic manufacturing credit  (210)  -   (550)  (664)
Non-deductible merger expenses  5,861   1,111   10,704   - 
Foreign tax rate differential  931   848   838   221 
Research and development credit and deduction  (2,148)  (53)  (721)  (170)
Settlement of and change in tax contingencies  (3,416)  -   1,000   353 
Other, net  (2,225)  (100)  (1,522)  454 
  $(38,927) $(6,831) $24,935  $20,540 

The tax effects of temporary differences which give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of:

  June 30, 
  2008  2007 
  Successor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
       
Accounts receivable $250  $381 
Inventories  17,191   12,573 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  20,652   12,466 
Other long-term liabilities  3,440   20,061 
Capital loss carryforwards  11,145   8,192 
Tax loss carryforwards  10,396   6,424 
Tax credit carryforwards  -   44 
Gross deferred tax assets  63,074   60,141 
Less:  valuation allowance  (23,131)  (15,800)
Net deferred tax assets  39,943   44,341 
Property, plant and equipment  (8,249)  (1,359)
Intangible assets  (164,112)  (13,773)
Gross deferred tax liabilities  (172,361)  (15,132)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $(132,418) $29,209 

We recorded increases of $0, $12.5 million, $2.9 million and $1.3 million to additional paid-in capital during the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, in connection with the excess of the realized tax benefit related to compensation deductions on the exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares over the deferred tax asset attributable to stock compensation costs for such awards.
F-28

As of June 30, 2008, we have capital loss carryforwards of $30.0 million, of which $21.6 million expires in 2010 and $8.4 million expires in 2013, and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $12.7 million in the UK, $11.8 million in France and $6.0 million in China which have no expiration.  We have state net operating loss carryforwards that create a utilizable net tax benefit of $1.6 million. We have provided a valuation allowance against all our capital loss carryforwards, all net operating loss carryforwards in France and China, $10.6 million net operating loss carryforwards in the UK, and certain other deferred tax assets that are not deemed realizable.
  June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  Successor  Successor 
  (In thousands) 
       
Accounts receivable $203  $250 
Inventories  20,926   17,191 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  14,625   20,652 
Other long-term liabilities  12,660   3,440 
Capital loss carryforwards  -   11,145 
Tax loss carryforwards  15,656   10,396 
Tax credit carryforwards  7,590   - 
Gross deferred tax assets  71,660   63,074 
Less:  valuation allowance  (17,300)  (23,131)
Net deferred tax assets  54,360   39,943 
Property, plant and equipment  (8,235)  (8,249)
Non-distributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries  (8,138)  - 
Intangible assets  (145,871)  (164,112)
Gross deferred tax liabilities  (162,244)  (172,361)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $(107,884) $(132,418)

Deferred tax assets have resulted primarily from our future deductible temporary differences and net operating loss, tax credit and capital loss carryforwards.  In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets depends upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income to allow for the utilization of its deductible temporary differences and loss and credit carryforwards.  If such estimates and related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in our consolidated statements of operations.  Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets and the need for additional valuation allowances quarterly. At this time, based on current facts and circumstances, management believes that it is more likely than not that we will realize benefit for our gross deferred tax assets, except those deferred tax assets against which a valuation allowance has been recorded.

Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been provided on undistributed foreign earnings through June 30, 2008 since we expect that substantially all of these earnings will be permanently reinvested in foreign operations.  Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries.  Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred

Deferred U.S. income taxes have been provided on undistributed foreign earnings for the year ended June 30, 2009 since we expect that substantially all of these earnings will be distributed to the US. During the year ended June 30, 2009, we repatriated $6.8 million of foreign earnings to fund interest payments required by our credit agreements.  Such repatriations will continue for the foreseeable future.  As such, effective in fiscal 2009, we provide U.S. income taxes on foreign income in the year earned.

In the year ended June 30, 2009 we utilized capital loss carryforwards of $7.3 million and had capital loss carryforwards of $14.0 million that expired unused.

F-35
As of June 30, 2009, we have domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $17.5 million which expire in fiscal 2029 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $4.3 million in the U.K., $15.6 million in France and $7.3 million in China which have no expiration.  We have state net operating loss carryforwards that create an available net tax liabilitiesbenefit of $2.1 million. We have provided a valuation allowance against all net operating loss carryforwards in France and potentialChina, $3.0 million net operating loss carryforwards in the U.K., $287,000 of state net tax benefits, $6.8 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards and certain other deferred tax assets that are not deemed realizable.

As of June 30, 2009, we have U.S. research and development tax credit carryforwards of $765,000 which have been claimed and expire in fiscal 2029 and U.S. foreign tax credits isof $1.1 million which have been claimed and expire in fiscal 2019. The Company also has foreign tax credits of $5.6 million that relate to foreign source income upon which U.S. taxes have been provided, but are not practicalyet subject to calculate because of the complexity of this hypothetical calculation.

In June 2006 we repatriated $1.5 million ofcurrent U.S. income taxes.  We have provided a valuation allowance against all claimed and unclaimed foreign earnings.  This $1.5 million dividend was an extraordinary dividend that qualified under the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act for the 85 percent dividend received deduction.tax credits.

We made income tax payments of $3.6 million, $7.8 million, $191,000 $28.8 million and $25.7$28.8 million and received refunds of $2.3 million, $27.1 million, $0 and $284,000 and $2.9 million during the year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the yearsyear ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively.  As a result of the Merger and the payments to option holders, we had a taxable loss for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 of $78.9 million.  This net operating loss was carried back to fiscal years 2007 and 2006, resulting in a $27.1 million Federal tax refund, which we received in May 2008.

On July 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-anTaxes - an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109.”  This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsSFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”  FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return.  FIN 48 provides that unrecognized tax benefits should be based on the facts, circumstances and information available at each balance sheet date and that subsequent changes in judgment should be based on new facts and circumstances and any resulting change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefit should be accounted for in the interim period in which the change occurs.  The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The aggregate amount of unrecognized tax benefits included in liabilities was as follows (in thousands):follows:

F-29
Balance at June 30, 2007 $4,421 
Gross increase related to tax positions taken    
   prior to fiscal year  495 
Gross decrease related to tax positions taken    
  prior to fiscal year  (58)
 Reduction as a result of a lapse of the    
  applicable statute of limitations  (3,853)
     
Balance at June 30, 2008 $1,005 
  Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
       
Balance at beginning of year $1,005  $4,421 
Gross increase related to tax positions taken prior to fiscal year  817   495 
Gross decrease related to tax positions taken prior to fiscal year  (83)  (58)
Reduction as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations  -   (3,853)
Balance at end of year $1,739  $1,005 

Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities recognized in accordance with the provisions of FIN 48 are included in income tax expense, consistent with our historical policy and amounted to $401,000, $124,000 and $0 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to July 14, 2007, respectively.  At June 30, 20082009 and 20072008 accrued interest on uncertain tax positions was $188,000$474,000 and $815,000,$188,000, respectively, net of the Federal benefit.

F-36

In September 2007, we settled a New York State income tax audit for the fiscal years 2002 through 2004. The decrease in the liability of $58,000 in fiscal 2008 was for the reversal of a liability previously recognized.

In April 2009, we settled a New York State income tax audit for the fiscal years 2005 and 2006 with no payment of taxes. The decrease in liability of $83,000 in fiscal 2009 was for a reversal of a liability previously recognized.

Currently, we are being audited by the Internal Revenue Service for the fiscal years 2006 and 2007 and the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007; the state of New York for fiscal years 2005 and 2006; and the state of Kansas for the fiscal years 2004 through 2007. Management does not believe that the resolution of the ongoing income tax examinations described above will have a material adverse impact on our financial position.  Changes in the liabilities for uncertain tax positions will be recognized in the interim period in which the positions are effectively settled or there is a change in factual circumstances. The statute of limitations for our fiscal year 20042005 Federal and the majority of our State tax returns has expired.

13.We recorded increases of $0, $0, $12.5 million and $2.9 million to additional paid-in capital during the year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the year ended June 30, 2007, respectively, in connection with the excess of the realized tax benefit related to compensation deductions on the exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares over the deferred tax asset attributable to stock compensation costs for such awards.

15.     Employment Contracts

We have employment agreements with our officers and certain other key employees for varying periods through December 31, 20132014 with annual remuneration ranging from $108,000$80,000 to $525,000,$555,000, plus cost of living adjustments and, in some cases, additional compensation based upon earnings of the Company.  Future aggregate minimum payments under these contracts are $7.7$9.7 million.  Certain of the contracts provide for a three-year consulting period at the expiration of the employment term at two-thirds of salary.  In addition, certain of these officers have the option to terminate their employment agreements upon a change in control of the Company, as defined, and receive lump sum payments equal to the salary and bonus, if any, for the remainder of the term.

14.16.     Employee Benefit Plans

401(k) and Profit Sharing Plans

All employees of the Company and certain subsidiaries who are not members of a collective bargaining agreement are eligible to participate in a Company sponsored 401(k) plan. Each participant has the option to contribute a portion of his or her compensation and through June 30, 2009 (when the discretionary match was suspended), to receive a discretionary employer matching contribution.  Furthermore, employees of one subsidiary are eligible to participate in a qualified profit sharing plan and receive an allocation of a discretionary share of the subsidiary’s profits.  For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007, and 2006,respectively, aggregate expenses related to these 401(k) and profit sharing plans were $5.3 million, $4.7 million, $413,000 and $4.7 million, and $3.9 million, respectively.

 
F-30F-37
 

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Effective January 1, 1994, we established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) which provides retirement, death and disability benefits to certain of our current and former officers.  As of June 30, 2008, the SERP is unfunded, however, there are funds being held in a rabbi trust for the SERP consisting primarily of cash surrender value of life insurance policies that specify the SERP as the beneficiary.  Those assets (which are included in other assets) totaled $8.0 million and $7.1 million at June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and are not considered in the fair value of plan assets.  The measurement date for the SERP is June 30.  Due to the retirement in 2005 of one of our officers we made payments of $523,000, $105,000, $674,000 and $267,000 in the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively, and are required to make payments of $628,000 in each fiscal year hereafter pursuant to the SERP.  Payments to this officer cease December 31, 2015 or upon death, whichever is later.

The Merger constituted a change in control of the Company that accelerated the vesting of benefits under our SERP in the event of termination of employment of theits three remaining active participants on or prior to August 15, 2008.  TheAdditionally, soon after the Merger, the SERP was amended to provide that no additional benefits are earned after August 31, 2007.  Accordingly, if a participant’s employment was terminated prior to August 15, 2008, the participant would have received a lump sum payment of the present value of the benefits at retirement age based on average pay through August 31, 2007.  The additional benefits payable under the SERP resulting from the change of control of $16.6 million was recorded as compensation expense (included in sale transaction expenses) in August 2007 (Successor period).

The Company entered into amended employment agreements with certain participants in the SERP which, among other terms, provided that if such participants remain employed beyond August 15, 2008, which they have, specified payments, approximating the benefits earned under the SERP, plus 6% interest per annum from August 15, 2007, would be payable to those participants in full satisfaction of the benefits payable under the SERP, payable the earlier of December 31, 2008 to January 5, 2009, or upon specified events, including an additional change of control of the Company or termination.  The aggregate liability to these participants under the SERP, including the related interest, was $19.9 million (of which $19.1 million was included in Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities at June 30, 2008.  Thus the amounts payable under the SERP have been fixed, except for the payments due one retired employee for which an actuarially determined liability of $6.9 million is recorded as of June 30, 2008.2008) and was paid in December 2008 and January 2009.  In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, we paid $10.3 million of benefits to participants in ourthe SERP.

As of June 30, 2009, the SERP andis unfunded, however, there are funds (primarily the remaining liability related tocash surrender value of life insurance policies that specify the SERP as the beneficiary) being held in a rabbi trust for the one remaining individual in the SERP, an officer who retired in 2005.  Those assets (which are included in other assets) totaled $8.6 million and $8.0 million at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are not considered in the fair value of plan assets.  An actuarially determined liability of $6.7 million for the one remaining SERP participant is $26.0 million,recorded as of June 30, 2009, of which the $19.1$628,000 and $6.1 million that is payable no later than December 2008 or January 2009 is included in Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities.  We expect to pay $628,000Defined Benefit Plan Obligations, respectively.  Payments to the one remaining participant in the SERP planretired officer of $628,000, $523,000, $105,000 and $674,000 were made in the fiscal year ending2009, the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year 2007, respectively.  We are required to make payments of $628,000 in each fiscal year pursuant to the SERP to this retired officer through December 31, 2015 or upon death, whichever is later.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and $6.3 million thereafter, which is included in accrued expenses and long-term defined benefit obligations, respectively, in the June 30, 2008 balance sheet.  In the Successor period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, we recorded $544,000 and $858,000, respectively, of interest expense incurred on the SERP liabilities and $444,000 and $343,000 of pension expense, included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations, for an increase in the SERP liability.

Adoption of FASB Statement No. 158

Effective June 30, 2007, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” which requires employers to recognize in their balance sheets the overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit postretirement plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation (the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement plans).  Employers must recognize the change in the funded status of the plan in the year in which the change occurs through accumulated other comprehensive income. SFAS No. 158 also requires plan assets and obligations to be measured as of the employer’s balance sheet date.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158, changes in the funded status of our plans were not immediately recognized, rather they were deferred and recognized ratably over future periods.  Upon adoption of SFAS No. 158, we recognized the amounts of prior changes in the funded status of our SERP through accumulated other comprehensive income which had the following impact on the individual line items in the June 30, 2007 balance sheet:income.

 
F-31F-38
 

Effect of Applying SFAS No. 158
on Individual Line Items in the Statement of Financial Position
June 30, 2007
(In thousands)

  Before     After 
  Application of     Application of 
   Statement 158  Adjustments  Statement 158 
          
Deferred income taxes $12,261  $428  $12,689 
Other assets  16,456   (349)  16,107 
Total assets  674,317   79   674,396 
             
Defined benefit plan and other            
   postretirement plan obligations  16,721   807   17,528 
Total liabilities  162,892   807   163,699 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  28,374   (728)  27,646 
Total stockholders' equity  511,425   (728)  510,697 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity  674,317   79   674,396 

Obligations and Funded Status of the SERP:

  Year Ended 
  June 30, 
  2007 
  (In thousands) 
    
Change in projected benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $17,158 
Service cost  151 
Interest cost  1,051 
Actuarial loss  470 
Benefits paid  (674)
Benefit obligation at end of year $18,156 
     
Change in plan assets    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $- 
Actual return on plan assets  - 
Employer contributions  674 
Benefits paid  (674)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $- 
     
Unfunded status at end of year $(18,156)
F-32

Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of:

  June 30, 
  2007 
  (In thousands) 
    
Accrued benefit cost $(18,215)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  8,159 
     
Net amount recognized $(10,056)
The Company’s net unfunded liability relating to its defined benefit and other postretirement benefit plans at June 30, 2007 is as follows:

  June 30, 
  2007 
  (In thousands) 
    
SERP $(18,156)
Less:  Current portion  628 
Long-term defined benefit plan    
   obligations $(17,528)
     

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

 Years Ended June 30,  Year Ended June 30, 
 2007  2006  2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
         
Service cost $151  $147  $151 
Interest cost 1,051  923   1,051 
Expected return on plan assets -  -   - 
Amortization of net transition (asset) obligation 38  38   38 
Recognized actuarial loss  537   687   537 
Net periodic benefit cost $1,777  $1,795  $1,777 

Additional Information

  Year Ended June 30, 
  2007 
  (In thousands) 
    
Increase (decrease) in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income $394 

Assumptions

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations

  SERP 
  Years Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007 
          
Discount rate  5.00%  5.00%  6.25%
Rate of compensation increase  *   *   3.00%
 Years Ended June 30,
 2007 2006
 (In thousands)
    
Increase (decrease) in minimum liability included   
   in other comprehensive income$  394 $1,095

F-33

Assumptions

  Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations

  SERP 
  Years Ended June 30, 
  2008  2007  2006 
          
          
Discount rate  5.00%  6.25%  6.25%
Rate of compensation increase  *   3.00%  3.00%

           Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost

  SERP 
 Years Ended June 30,  SERP 
 2008  2007  2006  Years Ended June 30, 
       2009  2008  2007 
                  
Discount rate  5.00%  6.25%  5.25%  5.00%  5.00%  6.25%
Expected long-term return on plan assets  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Rate of compensation increase  *   3.00%  3.00%  *   *   3.00%

*Not applicable as the one participant in the SERP whose liability is actuarially determined atJuneat June 30, 2009 and 2008 is an inactive retired employee.

Plan Assets

As of June 30, 20082009 and 20072008 the SERP is unfunded.

15.
F-39
17.     Legal Matters

As discussed in Note 3,In March 2005, we settledsold the action with GAnet assets of our shock and Franciscovibration control device manufacturing business (“VMC”).  Under the terms of the sale agreements, we retained certain liabilities relating to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the premises occupied by VMC as of the date of sale and recorded a liability for $2.5the estimated remediation costs.  The accrued environmental liability at June 30, 2009 is $1.3 million, in January
2008.of which $322,000 is expected to be paid within one year.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we became aware that certain RadHard bidirectional multipurpose transceivers sold by us since 1999 may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”).ITAR. Accordingly, we filed a Voluntary Disclosure with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State, describing the details of the possible inadvertent misclassification. Simultaneously, we fliedfiled a Commodity Jurisdiction request providing detailed information and data supporting our contention that the product is not subject to ITAR and requestedrequesting a determination that such product is not ITAR controlled. By letter datedOn November 15, 2007, we were informed that the U.S. Department of State had determined in response to our Commodity Jurisdiction request, that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with ITAR. We requested reconsideration of this determination. On February 7, 2008, we filed an addendum to the above referenced Voluntary Disclosure advising the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls that other products sold by us, similar in nature to the transceiver described above, may also be subject to the ITAR. The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls has agreed to extend the Company’sour time to file such addendum to the Voluntary Disclosure until there is a decision was rendered with respect to the Company’sour request for reconsideration of the determination in connection with the above-referenced Commodity Jurisdiction request. On August 5, 2008, the Companywe received a letter from the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (“DTCC”) requesting that the Companywe provide documentation and/or information relating to the Company’s ITARour compliance initiatives after November 15, 2007 as well as the results of any product reviews conducted by the Company,us, and indicating that a civil penalty against the Companyus could be warranted in connection with this matter following the review of such materials. The Company has complied withWe have provided all of the materials and documentation requested by the DTCC.  Our request by DTCC and has provided the detailed information requested.  In August 2008, the Company received the determinationfor reconsideration was denied by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls with respect to the request for reconsideration of the Commodity Jurisdiction determination.  The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls denied the Company’s request for reconsideration andon August 19, 2008 which determined that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of State in accordance with the ITAR. Accordingly, on September 18, 2008, the Companywe filed an addendum to itsour Voluntary Disclosure identifying other products that may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with the ITAR but were inadvertently misclassified.  At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us or the materiality of any outcome.

F-34

DuringThe Company is involved in various other ITAR related matters, including some recently identified with the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we became aware that certain components that our Plainview subsidiary manufactures and sells toprior practices of a customer in Canada mayrecently acquired business, which have been subject to the ITAR. Additionally, we have recently learned that a shipment of upgrade kits for a product sold by the Company to the United States Air Force was inadvertently shipped directly to Canada and incorrectly exported under the authority of the Export Administration Regulations. Accordingly, we filed a Voluntary Disclosuredisclosed, or may warrant disclosure, with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,U.S. Department of State, describingState.  Although we are in the detailsprocess of theaddressing these matters, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to adequately correct all possible inadvertent misclassifications. We were notified that this matter was closed without the assessment of fines or any other penalties.

In October, 2007, we were advised that United States Customs had held up the export of a component part of a test system sold by us. After extensive analysis of the component, we have determined that a General Purpose Communications Test Set sold by our Wichita subsidiary may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of State in accordance with the ITAR. Accordingly, on May 5, 2008, a Voluntary Disclosure was filed with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State, with respect to this product.  Included as part of this Voluntary Disclosure was a shipment made by our KDI subsidiary which failed to properly demarcate a previously approved ITAR export license. We were notified on May 13, 2008 that this matter was closed without the assessment of fines or any other penalties.

During May 2008, we became further aware that a certain product sold by our KDI subsidiary may have inadvertently been misclassified as not ITAR controlled. On August 5, 2008, the Company filed a Voluntary Disclosure with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State, describing the inadvertent misclassification of this product.violations. At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us related to these other ITAR matters, or the materiality of any outcome.

An amended class action complaint was filed against us and ourthe Predecessor Entity’s board of directors on June 20, 2007 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County. The complaint alleges that ourthe board breached its fiduciary duties to our stockholders (i) by issuing a preliminary proxy statement on June 5, 2007 that was issued in connection with seeking stockholder approval of the Merger and (ii) in approving certain amendments, that were allegedly beyond the scope of our corporate powerpowers, to our Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanSERP and the employment agreements of defendants Harvey R. Blau, our then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Leonard Borow, our then President and Chief Operating Officer and currently, the Successor Entity’s President and Chief Executive Officer. The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief with respect to the first cause of action, seeking to enjoin the July 26, 2007 special meeting of our stockholders on the grounds that we and our board of directors provided inadequate disclosures, and the recovery of money damages with respect to the second cause of action. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their motion for preliminary injunctive relief. On July 9, 2007, we and our board of directors filedWe have reached a motion to dismiss the amended class action complaint and that motion is currently pending. We are currently in settlement discussions with the plaintiffs and have accrued an insignificant liability for the settlement. The July 26, 2007 stockholders meeting went forward and the Company’s stockholders approved the Merger.  On August 15, 2007, the acquisition of the Company was completed.

F-40
We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

F-35

16.18.      Other Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

Several of our operating facilities and certain machinery and equipment are leased under agreements expiring through 2020.  The leases for machinery and equipment generally contain purchase options at the then fair value of the related leased assets at the end of their lease term.

Future minimum payments under operating leases as of June 30, 20082009 are as follows for the fiscal years:

 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
2009 $5,492 
2010  4,512  $6,864 
2011  3,187   5,390 
2012  1,757   3,724 
2013  764   2,205 
2014  1,196 
Thereafter  1,029   1,114 
Future minimum lease payments $16,741  $20,493 

Rental expense was $7.4 million, $7.0 million, $1.1 million, $9.5 million, and $9.5 million for the periods August 15, 2007 tofiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and for the fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively.  Sub-lease rental income was $486,000, $145,000, $1.2 million and $1.1 million for2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007, respectively.  Sub-lease rental income was $84,000, $486,000, $145,000, and $1.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and 2006,the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
17.
19.      Business Segments

Our business segments and major products included in each segment, are as follows:

Microelectronic Solutions (“AMS”)

 ·Microelectronic Components, Sub-assemblies and Modules

·Integrated Circuits
 ·Motion Control Systems

Test Solutions (“ATS”)

 ·Instrument Products and Test Systems

We are a manufacturer of advanced technology systems and components for commercial industry, government and defense contractors. Approximately 29%37% of our sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, 29% for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, 21% for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and 30% and 29% for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were to agencies of the United States government or to prime defense contractors or subcontractors of the United States government. No one customer constituted more than 10% of sales during any of the periods presented. Inter-segment sales were not material and have been eliminated from the tables below.

F-41
The majority of our operations are located in the United States; however, we also have operations in Europe and Asia, with our most significant international operations in the United Kingdom.U.K. Net sales from facilities located in the United KingdomU.K. were approximately $129.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, $167.7 million for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, and $11.7 million for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $166.7 million and $152.9 million for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.2007. Total assets of the United Kingdom operations were $188.2 million as of June 30, 2009 and $237.5 million as of June 30, 2008 and $230.0 million as of June 30, 2007.2008.

F-36
Revenues,Net sales, based on the customers’ locations, attributed to the United States and other regions are as follows:

 Period  Period  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
 August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended  Ended  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
 June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007  June 30, 2006  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
 Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                        
United States of America $329,226  $21,183  $346,235  $318,244  $350,844  $329,226  $21,183  $346,235 
Europe and Middle East 141,422  10,357  155,905  148,517   140,458   141,422   10,357   155,905 
Asia and Australia 123,887  6,242  84,779  71,866   98,621   123,887   6,242   84,779 
Other regions  10,456   439   6,227   7,616   9,413   10,456   439   6,227 
 $604,991  $38,221  $593,146  $546,243  $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 
 
F-37F-42
 
Selected financial data by segment is as follows:

  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year 
   to June 30,  to August 14,  Ended June 30,  Ended June 30, 
  2008  2007  2007  2006 
  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Net sales:            
   Microelectronic solutions ("AMS") $283,695  $19,017  $266,515  $241,437 
   Test solutions ("ATS")  321,296   19,204   326,631   304,806 
   Net sales $604,991  $38,221  $593,146  $546,243 
                 
Segment adjusted operating income:                
    - AMS $74,802  $24  $63,908  $58,467 
    - ATS  54,216   (7,582)  38,582   34,771 
   General corporate expense  (8,176)  (2,347)  (17,727)  (15,279)
Adjusted operating income (loss)  120,842   (9,905)  84,763   77,959 
                 
Amortization of acquired intangibles                
   - AMS  (44,085)  (279)  (1,911)  (2,134)
   - ATS  (28,991)  (1,413)  (11,095)  (11,644)
Share based compensation                
   - AMS  -   (83)  (965)  (1,488)
   - ATS  -   95   (958)  (1,731)
   - Corporate  (3,123)  (226)  (2,161)  (3,433)
Restructuring charges                
   - AMS  (414)  -   -   - 
   - ATS  (6,581)  (3,778)  (2,840)  (3,214)
One-time lease termination costs                
   - ATS  -   (576)  -   - 
Merger related expenses - Corporate  (4,092)  (1,319)  -   - 
Acquired in-process R&D costs                
   - AMS  (16,335)  -   -   - 
   - ATS  (8,640)  -   -   - 
Current period impact of acquisition                
   related adjustments:                
   Inventory - AMS  (23,817)  (57)  -   - 
   Inventory - ATS  (15,151)  -   -   (1,088)
   Depreciation - AMS  (1,025)  -   -   - 
   Depreciation - ATS  (2,882)  -   -   - 
   Depreciation - Corporate  (193)  -   -   - 
   Deferred revenue - ATS  (2,510)  -   -   - 
Sale transaction expenses  (32,493)  (3,717)  (30,584)  - 
Operating income (loss) (GAAP)  (69,490)  (21,258)  34,249   53,227 
                 
Interest expense  (74,658)  (275)  (672)  (608)
Other income (expense), net  4,617   294   152   1,669 
Income (loss) from continuing                
   operations before income taxes $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729  $54,288 
F-38
  Fiscal Year  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Fiscal Year 
  Ended June 30,  to June 30,  to August 14,  Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  2007 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Net sales:            
Microelectronic solutions ("AMS") $287,517  $283,695  $19,017  $266,515 
Test solutions ("ATS")  311,819   321,296   19,204   326,631 
Net sales $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 
                 
Segment adjusted operating income:                
- AMS $63,368  $74,802  $24  $63,908 
- ATS  50,141   54,216   (7,582)  38,582 
General corporate expense  (11,377)  (8,176)  (2,347)  (17,727)
Adjusted operating income (loss)  102,132   120,842   (9,905)  84,763 
                 
Amortization of acquired intangibles                
- AMS  (36,635)  (44,085)  (279)  (1,911)
- ATS  (26,327)  (28,991)  (1,413)  (11,095)
Share based compensation                
- AMS  -   -   (83)  (965)
- ATS  -   -   95   (958)
- Corporate  (1,955)  (3,123)  (226)  (2,161)
Restructuring charges                
- AMS  -   (414)  -   - 
- ATS  (4,102)  (6,581)  (3,778)  (2,840)
One-time lease termination costs                
- ATS  -   -   (576)  - 
Merger related expenses - Corporate  (4,283)  (4,092)  (1,319)  - 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles                
- AMS  (41,225)  -   -   - 
- ATS  -   -   -     
Acquired in-process R&D costs              - 
- AMS  (1,665)  (16,335)  -   - 
- ATS  -   (8,640)  -   - 
Current period impact of acquisition related adjustments:                
Inventory - AMS  -   (23,817)  (57)  - 
Inventory - ATS  (668)  (15,151)  -   - 
Depreciation - AMS  (1,143)  (1,025)  -   - 
Depreciation - ATS  (2,702)  (2,882)  -   - 
Depreciation - Corporate  (220)  (193)  -   - 
Deferred revenue - ATS  (416)  (2,510)  -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  -   (32,493)  (3,717)  (30,584)
Operating income (loss) (GAAP)  (19,209)  (69,490)  (21,258)  34,249 
                 
Interest expense  (83,823)  (74,658)  (275)  (672)
Other income (expense), net  11,012   4,617   294   152 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $(92,020) $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729 
F-43
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Total assets:      
- AMS $689,487  $754,451 
- ATS  566,120   605,120 
- Corporate  105,990   119,428 
- Assets of discontinued operations  -   - 
Total assets: $1,361,597  $1,478,999 
  As of     As of June 30, 
  June 30, 2008     2007  2006 
  
(In thousands)
 
             
Total Assets:            
   AMS $754,451     $229,046  $186,531 
   ATS  605,120      404,548   377,190 
   Corporate  119,428      34,408   59,700 
   Assets of discontinued operations  -      6,394   9,970 
          Total assets $1,478,999     $674,396  $633,391 
                
  August, 15, 2007  July 1, 2007 to  For the Year Ended June 30, 
   to June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  2007  2006 
Capital expenditures: (In thousands) 
   AMS $7,087  $338  $9,942  $6,255 
   ATS  5,950   501   7,155   8,777 
   Corporate  142   249   1,330   333 
          Total capital expenditures $13,179  $1,088  $18,427  $15,365 
                 
Depreciation and amortization expense:             
   AMS $51,419  $1,137  $8,675  $8,949 
   ATS  41,060   2,509   21,258   21,249 
   Corporate  553   16   209   173 
         Total depreciation and                
             amortization expense $93,032  $3,662  $30,142  $30,371 
  Fiscal Year  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Fiscal Year 
  Ended June 30,  to June 30,  to August 14,  Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  2007 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Capital expenditures:            
- AMS $6,792  $7,087  $338  $9,942 
- ATS  11,914   5,950   501   7,155 
- Corporate  11   142   249   1,330 
Total capital expenditures $18,717  $13,179  $1,088  $18,427 
                 
Depreciation and amortization expense:                
- AMS  45,471   51,419   1,137   8,675 
- ATS  38,257   41,060   2,509   21,258 
- Corporate  698   553   16   209 
Total depreciation and amortization expense $84,426  $93,032  $3,662  $30,142 

Management evaluatedevaluates the operating results of the two segments based upon pre-tax operating income, before costs related to restructuring, lease termination charges, amortization of acquired intangibles, share-based compensation, acquired in-process research and development costs, Company Sale Transaction expenses, merger related expenses and the impact of any acquisition related adjustments.

18.20.        Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Financial Information

The following supplemental condensed consolidating financial information sets forth, on an unconsolidated basis, the balance sheets at June 30, 20082009 and June 30, 20072008 and the statements of operations and cash flows for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the yearsfiscal year ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 for Aeroflex Incorporated (the “Parent Company”), and for the Guarantor Subsidiaries and, on a combined basis, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.  The supplemental condensed consolidating financial information reflects for all fiscal periods presented, the investments of the Parent Company in the Guarantor Subsidiaries as well as the investments of the Parent Company and the Guarantor Subsidiaries in the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, in all cases using the equity method.  The Parent Company’s purchase price allocation adjustments, including applicable intangible assets, arising from business acquisitions have been pushed down to the applicable subsidiary columns (see Notes 3 and 4).

 
F-39F-44
 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from August 15, 2007 toYear Ended June 30, 20082009
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $429,372  $180,832  $(5,213) $604,991 
Cost of sales  -   253,291   104,857   (5,195)  352,953 
   Gross profit  -   176,081   75,975   (18)  252,038 
Selling, general and administrative costs  15,584   66,265   39,237   -   121,086 
Research and development costs  -   40,097   29,801   -   69,898 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   63,477   9,599   -   73,076 
Acquired in-process R&D costs  -   21,820   3,155   -   24,975 
Company sale transaction expenses  32,493   -   -   -   32,493 
Operating income (loss)  (48,077)  (15,578)  (5,817)  (18)  (69,490)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
   Interest expense  (74,563)  (95)  -   -   (74,658)
   Other income (expense), net  1,943   147   2,527   -   4,617 
Intercompany charges  81,994   (80,482)  (1,512)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations                    
   before income taxes  (38,703)  (96,008)  (4,802)  (18)  (139,531)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (11,525)  (28,589)  1,187   -   (38,927)
Income (loss) from continuing                    
   operations  (27,178)  (67,419)  (5,989)  (18)  (100,604)
Loss from discontinued operations,                    
   net of tax  -   (4,821)  -   -   (4,821)
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries  (78,247)  (5,712)  -   83,959   - 
Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(77,952) $(5,989) $83,941  $(105,425)
F-40

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $25,858  $12,809  $(446) $38,221 
Cost of sales  -   15,066   8,074   (279)  22,861 
   Gross profit  -   10,792   4,735   (167)  15,360 
Selling, general and administrative costs  3,892   7,571   7,568   -   19,031 
Research and development costs  -   5,526   6,652   -   12,178 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   601   1,091   -   1,692 
Company sale transaction expenses  3,717   -   -   -   3,717 
Operating income (loss)  (7,609)  (2,906)  (10,576)  (167)  (21,258)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
   Interest expense  (261)  (14)  -   -   (275)
   Other income (expense), net  157   27   110   -   294 
Intercompany charges  5,544   (5,109)  (435)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations                    
   before income taxes  (2,169)  (8,002)  (10,901)  (167)  (21,239)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (853)  (3,145)  (2,833)  -   (6,831)
Income (loss) from continuing                    
   operations  (1,316)  (4,857)  (8,068)  (167)  (14,408)
Loss from discontinued operations,                    
   net of tax  -   (2,508)  -   -   (2,508)
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries  (15,600)  (7,814)  -   23,414   - 
Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $431,581  $175,317  $(7,562) $599,336 
Cost of sales  -   227,200   94,195   (7,164)  314,231 
Gross profit  -   204,381   81,122   (398)  285,105 
Selling, general and administrative costs  17,835   73,384   37,137   -   128,356 
Research and development costs  -   46,272   23,834   -   70,106 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   53,862   9,100   -   62,962 
Acquired in-process R&D costs  -   -   1,665   -   1,665 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  -   41,225   -   -   41,225 
Operating income (loss)  (17,835)  (10,362)  9,386   (398)  (19,209)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (83,724)  (88)  (11)  -   (83,823)
Other income (expense), net  (319)  907   10,424   -   11,012 
Intercompany charges  80,026   (77,524)  (2,502)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  (21,852)  (87,067)  17,297   (398)  (92,020)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (1,570)  (13,307)  (455)�� -   (15,332)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  (20,282)  (73,760)  17,752   (398)  (76,688)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (56,406)  18,605   -   37,801   - 
Net income (loss) $(76,688) $(55,155) $17,752  $37,403  $(76,688)
 
F-41F-45
 


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $429,372  $180,832  $(5,213) $604,991 
Cost of sales  -   253,291   104,857   (5,195)  352,953 
Gross profit  -   176,081   75,975   (18)  252,038 
Selling, general and administrative costs  15,584   66,265   39,237   -   121,086 
Research and development costs  -   40,097   29,801   -   69,898 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   63,477   9,599   -   73,076 
Acquired in-process R&D costs  -   21,820   3,155   -   24,975 
Company sale transaction expenses  32,493   -   -   -   32,493 
Operating income (loss)  (48,077)  (15,578)  (5,817)  (18)  (69,490)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (74,563)  (95)  -   -   (74,658)
Other income (expense), net  1,943   147   2,527   -   4,617 
Intercompany charges  81,994   (80,482)  (1,512)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (38,703)  (96,008)  (4,802)  (18)  (139,531)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (11,525)  (28,589)  1,187   -   (38,927)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (27,178)  (67,419)  (5,989)  (18)  (100,604)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (4,821)  -   -   (4,821)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (78,247)  (5,712)  -   83,959   - 
Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(77,952) $(5,989) $83,941  $(105,425)
F-46

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $25,858  $12,809  $(446) $38,221 
Cost of sales  -   15,066   8,074   (279)  22,861 
Gross profit  -   10,792   4,735   (167)  15,360 
Selling, general and administrative costs  3,892   7,571   7,568   -   19,031 
Research and development costs  -   5,526   6,652   -   12,178 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   601   1,091   -   1,692 
Company sale transaction expenses  3,717   -   -   -   3,717 
Operating income (loss)  (7,609)  (2,906)  (10,576)  (167)  (21,258)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (261)  (14)  -   -   (275)
Other income (expense), net  157   27   110   -   294 
Intercompany charges  5,544   (5,109)  (435)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (2,169)  (8,002)  (10,901)  (167)  (21,239)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (853)  (3,145)  (2,833)  -   (6,831)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (1,316)  (4,857)  (8,068)  (167)  (14,408)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (2,508)  -   -   (2,508)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (15,600)  (7,814)  -   23,414   - 
Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)
F-47

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended June 30, 2007
(In thousands)

    Subsidiary  Subsidiary           Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
 Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                              
Net sales $-  $422,347  $177,586  $(6,787) $593,146  $-  $422,347  $177,586  $(6,787) $593,146 
Cost of sales  -   217,025   98,927   (6,983)  308,969   -   217,025   98,927   (6,983)  308,969 
Gross profit -  205,322  78,659  196  284,177   -   205,322   78,659   196   284,177 
Selling, general and administrative costs 19,888  71,125  38,608  -  129,621   19,888   71,125   38,608   -   129,621 
Research and development costs -  42,241  34,476  -  76,717   -   42,241   34,476   -   76,717 
Amortization of acquired intangibles -  4,498  8,508  -  13,006   -   4,498   8,508   -   13,006 
Company sale transaction expenses  30,584   -   -   -   30,584   30,584   -   -   -   30,584 
Operating income (loss) (50,472) 87,458  (2,933) 196  34,249   (50,472)  87,458   (2,933)  196   34,249 
                                        
Other income (expense):                                        
Interest expense (534) (127) (11) -  (672)  (534)  (127)  (11)  -   (672)
Other income (expense), net 1,479  205  (1,532) -  152   1,479   205   (1,532)  -   152 
Intercompany charges  45,158   (41,672)  (3,486)  -   -   45,158   (41,672)  (3,486)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (4,369)  45,864   (7,962)  196   33,729 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (2,882)  30,251   (2,434)  -   24,935 
Income (loss) from continuing operations                      (1,487)  15,613   (5,528)  196   8,794 
before income taxes (4,369) 45,864  (7,962) 196  33,729 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (2,882)  30,251   (2,434)  -   24,935 
Income (loss) from continuing                    
operations (1,487) 15,613  (5,528) 196  8,794 
Loss from discontinued operations,                    
net of tax -  (3,868) -  -  (3,868)
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries  6,413   (4,629)  -   (1,784)  - 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (3,868)  -   -   (3,868)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  6,413   (4,629)  -   (1,784)  - 
Net income (loss) $4,926  $7,116  $(5,528) $(1,588) $4,926  $4,926  $7,116  $(5,528) $(1,588) $4,926 
 
F-42

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended June 30, 2006
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $378,283  $174,509  $(6,549) $546,243 
Cost of sales  -   196,093   94,877   (6,658)  284,312 
   Gross profit  -   182,190   79,632   109   261,931 
Selling, general and administrative costs  18,712   63,188   40,971   -   122,871 
Research and development costs  -   38,317   33,738   -   72,055 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   4,722   9,056   -   13,778 
Operating income (loss)  (18,712)  75,963   (4,133)  109   53,227 
                     
Other income (expense):                    
   Interest expense  (403)  (144)  (61)  -   (608)
   Other income (expense), net  779   832   58   -   1,669 
Intercompany charges  38,829   (36,443)  (2,386)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations                    
   before income taxes  20,493   40,208   (6,522)  109   54,288 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  7,950   15,598   (3,008)  -   20,540 
Income (loss) from continuing                    
   operations  12,543   24,610   (3,514)  109   33,748 
Loss from discontinued operations,                    
   net of tax  -   (5,652)  -   -   (5,652)
Change in accounting principle  12,543   18,958   (3,514)  109   28,096 
Cumulative effect of a change in                    
   accounting principle, net of tax benefit  -   (15)  (1,122)  -   (1,137)
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries  14,416   (4,274)  -   (10,142)  - 
Net income (loss) $26,959  $14,669  $(4,636) $(10,033) $26,959 
F-43

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $39,285  $(2,379) $17,243  $-  $54,149 
Accounts receivable, net  -   90,343   57,640   -   147,983 
Inventories  -   91,856   43,537   (502)  134,891 
Deferred income taxes  (2,352)  23,539   5,852   -   27,039 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,464   2,616   7,104   -   12,184 
Total current assets  39,397   205,975   131,376   (502)  376,246 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  13,406   63,964   27,279   -   104,649 
Non-current marketable securities  19,960   -   -   -   19,960 
Deferred financing costs  30,185   -   -   -   30,185 
Other assets  16,480   2,474   (394)  -   18,560 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   297,408   47,458   -   344,866 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives  -   90,229   33,149   -   123,378 
Goodwill  -   435,570   25,101   484   461,155 
Total assets $119,428  $1,095,620  $263,969  $(18) $1,478,999 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $5,250  $324  $-  $-  $5,574 
Accounts payable  554   19,882   18,946   -   39,382 
Deferred revenue, including advance payments  -   8,621   18,523   -   27,144 
Income taxes payable  409   -   1,527   -   1,936 
Accrued payroll expense  2,106   18,200   4,219   -   24,525 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  31,205   12,272   13,353   -   56,830 
Total current liabilities  39,524   59,299   56,568   -   155,391 
                     
Long-term debt  872,152   1,085   -   -   873,237 
Deferred income taxes  (12,254)  150,400   21,311   -   159,457 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,263   -   -   -   6,263 
Other long-term liabilities  1,368   487   6,148   -   8,003 
Intercompany investment  (248,051)  2,944   245,107   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (895,004)  953,623   (58,619)  -   - 
Total liabilities  (236,002)  1,167,838   270,515   -   1,202,351 
                     
Stockholder's equity  355,430   (72,218)  (6,546)  (18)  276,648 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $119,428  $1,095,620  $263,969  $(18) $1,478,999 

F-44

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2007
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $6,807  $(1,573) $7,766  $-  $13,000 
Marketable securities  9,500   -   -   -   9,500 
Accounts receivable, net  -   81,041   58,000   -   139,041 
Inventories  -   94,756   45,417   (316)  139,857 
Deferred income taxes  (13,554)  29,994   80   -   16,520 
Assets of discontinued operations  -   6,394   -   -   6,394 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,970   2,431   6,703   -   11,104 
Total current assets  4,723   213,043   117,966   (316)  335,416 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  2,446   53,021   25,945   -   81,412 
Deferred income taxes  12,689   -   -   -   12,689 
Deferred financing costs  36   -   -   -   36 
Other assets  14,513   563   1,031   -   16,107 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   23,358   23,416   -   46,774 
Goodwill  84   90,268   91,610   -   181,962 
Total assets $34,491  $380,253  $259,968  $(316) $674,396 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $1,835  $329  $-  $-  $2,164 
Accounts payable  3,774   15,733   18,770   -   38,277 
Deferred revenue, including advance payments  -   6,946   13,326   -   20,272 
Income taxes payable  (3,171)  14,888   (4,105)  -   7,612 
Liabilities of discontinued operations  -   2,394   -   -   2,394 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  11,406   28,167   23,521   -   63,094 
Total current liabilities  13,844   68,457   51,512   -   133,813 
                     
Long-term liabilities  12,837   10,145   6,904   -   29,886 
Investment in subsidiaries  (229,783)  4,853   224,930   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (204,844)  176,079   28,765   -   - 
Total liabilities  (407,946)  259,534   312,111   -   163,699 
                     
Stockholder's equity:  442,437   120,719   (52,143)  (316)  510,697 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $34,491  $380,253  $259,968  $(316) $674,396 

F-45

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
   Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(77,952) $(5,989) $83,941  $(105,425)
   Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   4,821   -   -   4,821 
   Income (loss) from continuing operations  (105,425)  (73,131)  (5,989)  83,941   (100,604)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  95,482   88,036   15,223   (83,941)  114,800 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  (9,943)  14,905   9,234   -   14,196 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (5,286)  -   -   (5,286)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (9,943)  9,619   9,234   -   8,910 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
   Acquisition of predecessor entity, net of cash acquired  (1,128,915)  (2,593)  13,215   -   (1,118,293)
   Payment for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired  (11,145)  -   -   -   (11,145)
   Capital expenditures  (142)  (9,386)  (3,651)  -   (13,179)
   Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   52   177   -   229 
   Purchase of marketable securities  (631,805)  -   -   -   (631,805)
   Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  611,853   -   -   -   611,853 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (1,160,154)  (11,927)  9,741   -   (1,162,340)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (36)  -   -   (36)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (1,160,154)  (11,963)  9,741   -   (1,162,376)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
   Proceeds from issuance of common stock  378,350   -   -   -   378,350 
   Borrowings under debt agreements  870,000   -   -   -   870,000 
   Debt repayments  (5,746)  (35)  (302)  -   (6,083)
   Debt financing costs  (33,222)  -   -   -   (33,222)
   Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (14,142)  -   -   -   (14,142)
   Witholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  14,142   -   -   -   14,142 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  1,209,382   (35)  (302)  -   1,209,045 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   (1,430)  -   (1,430)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  39,285   (2,379)  17,243   -   54,149 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  -   -   -   -   - 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $39,285  $(2,379) $17,243  $-  $54,149 

F-46

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
   Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)
   Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   2,508   -   -   2,508 
   Income (loss) from continuing operations  (16,916)  (12,671)  (8,068)  23,247   (14,408)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  23,110   12,708   13,591   (23,247)  26,162 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  6,194   37   5,523   -   11,754 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (461)  -   -   (461)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  6,194   (424)  5,523   -   11,293 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
   Capital expenditures  (249)  (587)  (252)  -   (1,088)
   Purchase of marketable securities  (53,828)  -   -   -   (53,828)
   Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  63,328   -   -   -   63,328 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  9,251   (587)  (252)  -   8,412 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (6)  -   -   (6)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  9,251   (593)  (252)  -   8,406 
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
   Debt repayments  (26)  (3)  -   -   (29)
   Debt financing costs  (477)  -   -   -   (477)
   Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  12,542   -   -   -   12,542 
   Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  583   -   -   -   583 
   Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (56)  -   -   -   (56)
   Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  56   -   -   -   56 
   Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  12,622   (3)  -   -   12,619 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   178   -   178 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  28,067   (1,020)  5,449   -   32,496 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  6,807   (1,573)  7,766   -   13,000 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $34,874  $(2,593) $13,215  $-  $45,496 

F-47

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2007
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
   Net income (loss) $4,926  $7,116  $(5,528) $(1,588) $4,926 
   Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   3,868   -   -   3,868 
   Income (loss) from continuing operations  4,926   10,984   (5,528)  (1,588)  8,794 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  2,779   726   8,592   1,588   13,685 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  7,705   11,710   3,064   -   22,479 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (1,677)  -   -   (1,677)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  7,705   10,033   3,064   -   20,802 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
   Payment for purchase of business, net of cash acquired  (10,663)  -   -   -   (10,663)
   Contingent payment for purchase of business  (9,247)  -   -   -   (9,247)
   Capital expenditures  (1,331)  (12,766)  (4,330)  -   (18,427)
   Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   382   98   -   480 
   Purchase of marketable securities  (589,577)  -   -   -   (589,577)
   Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  608,409   -   -   -   608,409 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (2,409)  (12,384)  (4,232)  -   (19,025)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (88)  -   -   (88)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (2,409)  (12,472)  (4,232)  -   (19,113)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
   Purchase and retirement of treasury stock  (17,234)  -   -   -   (17,234)
   Debt repayments  (315)  (11)  (285)  -   (611)
   Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  2,870   -   -   -   2,870 
   Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  14,182   -   -   -   14,182 
   Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (3,383)  -   -   -   (3,383)
   Withholding taxes collected for stock options exercises  3,383   -   -   -   3,383 
   Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  (497)  (11)  (285)  -   (793)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   1,717   -   1,717 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  4,799   (2,450)  264   -   2,613 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  2,008   877   7,502   -   10,387 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $6,807  $(1,573) $7,766  $-  $13,000 

 
F-48
 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2006
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiary  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
   Net income (loss) $26,959  $14,669  $(4,636) $(10,033) $26,959 
   Cumulative effect in accounting principle, net of tax  -   15   1,122   -   1,137 
   Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   5,652   -   -   5,652 
   Income (loss) from continuing operations  26,959   20,336   (3,514)  (10,033)  33,748 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  (4,148)  (6,878)  8,536   10,033   7,543 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  22,811   13,458   5,022   -   41,291 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (4,594)  -   -   (4,594)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  22,811   8,864   5,022   -   36,697 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
   Capital expenditures  (334)  (9,006)  (6,025)  -   (15,365)
   Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   11   105   -   116 
   Purchase of marketable securities  (348,545)  -   -   -   (348,545)
   Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  320,213   -   -   -   320,213 
   Preacquisition tax refund received  -   -   1,232   -   1,232 
   Other, net  -   234   (311)  -   (77)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (28,666)  (8,761)  (4,999)  -   (42,426)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (127)  -   -   (127)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (28,666)  (8,888)  (4,999)  -   (42,553)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
   Purchase and retirement of treasury stock  (402)  -   -   -   (402)
   Debt repayments  (325)  (333)  -   -   (658)
   Debt financing costs  (308)  -   -   -   (308)
   Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  551   -   -   -   551 
   Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  4,565   -   -   -   4,565 
   Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (1,062)  -   -   -   (1,062)
   Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  1,062   -   -   -   1,062 
   Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  4,081   (333)  -   -   3,748 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   (479)  -   (479)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  (1,774)  (357)  (456)  -   (2,587)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  3,782   1,234   7,958   -   12,974 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $2,008  $877  $7,502  $-  $10,387 
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet 
As of June 30, 2009 
(In thousands) 
                
     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $31,221  $(15) $26,542  $-  $57,748 
Accounts receivable, net  -   86,530   43,899   -   130,429 
Inventories  -   103,674   32,827   (898)  135,603 
Deferred income taxes  3,452   25,681   6,031   -   35,164 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,623   2,542   4,773   -   9,938 
Total current assets  37,296   218,412   114,072   (898)  368,882 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  12,720   67,624   20,563   -   100,907 
Non-current marketable securities  17,677   -   -   -   17,677 
Deferred financing costs  25,754   -   -   -   25,754 
Other assets  12,551   2,243   631   -   15,425 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   253,225   39,328   -   292,553 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives, net  -   85,404   26,862   -   112,266 
Goodwill  (10)  388,913   39,230   -   428,133 
Total assets $105,988  $1,015,821  $240,686  $(898) $1,361,597 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $5,250  $340  $-  $-  $5,590 
Accounts payable  285   20,553   15,736   -   36,574 
Advanced payments by customers and deferred revenue  -   17,433   15,985   -   33,418 
Income taxes payable  587   -   4,493   -   5,080 
Accrued payroll expenses  1,600   15,148   2,128   -   18,876 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  25,418   11,079   11,441   -   47,938 
Total current liabilities  33,140   64,553   49,783   -   147,476 
                     
Long-term debt  883,013   745   -   -   883,758 
Deferred income taxes  (11,453)  138,725   15,776   -   143,048 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,079   -   -   -   6,079 
Other long-term liabilities  16,825   1,271   3,380   -   21,476 
Intercompany investment  (268,635)  41,022   227,613   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (880,752)  902,126   (20,891)  (483)  - 
Total liabilities  (221,783)  1,148,442   275,661   (483)  1,201,837 
                     
Stockholder's equity:  327,771   (132,621)  (34,975)  (415)  159,760 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $105,988  $1,015,821  $240,686  $(898) $1,361,597 

 
F-49
 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $39,285  $(2,379) $17,243  $-  $54,149 
Accounts receivable, net  -   90,343   57,640   -   147,983 
Inventories  -   91,856   43,537   (502)  134,891 
Deferred income taxes  (2,352)  23,539   5,852   -   27,039 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,464   2,616   7,104   -   12,184 
Total current assets  39,397   205,975   131,376   (502)  376,246 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  13,406   63,964   27,279   -   104,649 
Non-current marketable securities  19,960   -   -   -   19,960 
Deferred financing costs  30,185   -   -   -   30,185 
Other assets  16,480   2,474   (394)  -   18,560 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   297,408   47,458   -   344,866 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives  -   90,229   33,149   -   123,378 
Goodwill  -   435,570   25,101   484   461,155 
Total assets $119,428  $1,095,620  $263,969  $(18) $1,478,999 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $5,250  $324  $-  $-  $5,574 
Accounts payable  554   19,882   18,946   -   39,382 
Deferred revenue, including advance payments  -   8,621   18,523   -   27,144 
Income taxes payable  409   -   1,527   -   1,936 
Accrued payroll expense  2,106   18,200   4,219   -   24,525 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  31,205   12,272   13,353   -   56,830 
Total current liabilities  39,524   59,299   56,568   -   155,391 
                     
Long-term debt  872,152   1,085   -   -   873,237 
Deferred income taxes  (12,254)  150,400   21,311   -   159,457 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,263   -   -   -   6,263 
Other long-term liabilities  1,368   487   6,148   -   8,003 
Intercompany investment  (248,051)  2,944   245,107   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (895,004)  953,623   (58,619)  -   - 
Total liabilities  (236,002)  1,167,838   270,515   -   1,202,351 
                     
Stockholder's equity  355,430   (72,218)  (6,546)  (18)  276,648 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $119,428  $1,095,620  $263,969  $(18) $1,478,999 

F-50

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiary  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $(76,688) $(55,155) $17,752  $37,403  $(76,688)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non-cash items, included in net income (loss)  93,160   70,023   5,365   (37,403)  131,145 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  16,472   14,868   23,117   -   54,457 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Payment for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired
  (18,935) $-  $-  $-  $(18,935)
Capital expenditures  (11)  (13,377)  (5,329)  -   (18,717)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   1,197   242   -   1,439 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (18,946) $(12,180) $(5,087) $-  $(36,213)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Debt repayments  (5,250)  (324)  -   -   (5,574)
Debt financing costs  (340)  -   -   -   (340)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  (5,590)  (324)  -   -   (5,914)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   (8,731)  -   (8,731)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (8,064)  2,364   9,299   -   3,599 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  39,285   (2,379)  17,243   -   54,149 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $31,221  $(15) $26,542  $-  $57,748 
F-51

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

  Quarter  Year Ended 
2008 First  Second  Third  Fourth  June 30, 
Net sales $140,236  $160,757  $157,304  $184,915  $643,212 
Gross profit  52,615   54,633   69,236   90,914   267,398 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (63,944)  (29,068)  (15,437)  (6,563)  (115,012)
        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(77,952) $(5,989) $83,941  $(105,425)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   4,821   -   -   4,821 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (105,425)  (73,131)  (5,989)  83,941   (100,604)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  95,482   88,036   15,223   (83,941)  114,800 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  (9,943)  14,905   9,234   -   14,196 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (5,286)  -   -   (5,286)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (9,943)  9,619   9,234   -   8,910 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Acquisition of predecessor entity, net of cash acquired  (1,128,915)  (2,593)  13,215   -   (1,118,293)
Payment for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired  (11,145)  -   -   -   (11,145)
Capital expenditures  (142)  (9,386)  (3,651)  -   (13,179)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   52   177   -   229 
Purchase of marketable securities  (631,805)  -   -   -   (631,805)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  611,853   -   -   -   611,853 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (1,160,154)  (11,927)  9,741   -   (1,162,340)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (36)  -   -   (36)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (1,160,154)  (11,963)  9,741   -   (1,162,376)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  378,350   -   -   -   378,350 
Borrowings under debt agreements  870,000   -   -   -   870,000 
Debt repayments  (5,746)  (35)  (302)  -   (6,083)
Debt financing costs  (33,222)  -   -   -   (33,222)
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (14,142)  -   -   -   (14,142)
Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  14,142   -   -   -   14,142 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  1,209,382   (35)  (302)  -   1,209,045 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   (1,430)  -   (1,430)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  39,285   (2,379)  17,243   -   54,149 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  -   -   -   -   - 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $39,285  $(2,379) $17,243  $-  $54,149 
F-52

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)

  Quarter  Year Ended 
2007 First  Second  Third  Fourth  June 30, 
Net sales $135,330  $143,047  $149,854  $164,915  $593,146 
Gross profit  64,030   68,783   71,401   79,963   284,177 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  7,903   10,093   6,573   (15,775)  8,794 
        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   2,508   -   -   2,508 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (16,916)  (12,671)  (8,068)  23,247   (14,408)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  23,110   12,708   13,591   (23,247)  26,162 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  6,194   37   5,523   -   11,754 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (461)  -   -   (461)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  6,194   (424)  5,523   -   11,293 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Capital expenditures  (249)  (587)  (252)  -   (1,088)
Purchase of marketable securities  (53,828)  -   -   -   (53,828)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  63,328   -   -   -   63,328 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  9,251   (587)  (252)  -   8,412 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (6)  -   -   (6)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  9,251   (593)  (252)  -   8,406 
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Debt repayments  (26)  (3)  -   -   (29)
Debt financing costs  (477)  -   -   -   (477)
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  12,542   -   -   -   12,542 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  583   -   -   -   583 
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (56)  -   -   -   (56)
Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  56   -   -   -   56 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  12,622   (3)  -   -   12,619 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   178   -   178 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  28,067   (1,020)  5,449   -   32,496 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  6,807   (1,573)  7,766   -   13,000 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $34,874  $(2,593) $13,215  $-  $45,496 
F-53

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2007
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $4,926  $7,116  $(5,528) $(1,588) $4,926 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   3,868   -   -   3,868 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  4,926   10,984   (5,528)  (1,588)  8,794 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  2,779   726   8,592   1,588   13,685 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  7,705   11,710   3,064   -   22,479 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (1,677)  -   -   (1,677)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  7,705   10,033   3,064   -   20,802 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Payment for purchase of business, net of cash acquired  (10,663)  -   -   -   (10,663)
Contingent payment for purchase of business  (9,247)  -   -   -   (9,247)
Capital expenditures  (1,331)  (12,766)  (4,330)  -   (18,427)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   382   98   -   480 
Purchase of marketable securities  (589,577)  -   -   -   (589,577)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  608,409   -   -   -   608,409 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (2,409)  (12,384)  (4,232)  -   (19,025)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (88)  -   -   (88)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (2,409)  (12,472)  (4,232)  -   (19,113)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock  (17,234)  -   -   -   (17,234)
Debt repayments  (315)  (11)  (285)  -   (611)
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  2,870   -   -   -   2,870 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  14,182   -   -   -   14,182 
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (3,383)  -   -   -   (3,383)
Withholding taxes collected for stock options exercises  3,383   -   -   -   3,383 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  (497)  (11)  (285)  -   (793)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   1,717   -   1,717 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  4,799   (2,450)  264   -   2,613 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  2,008   877   7,502   -   10,387 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $6,807  $(1,573) $7,766  $-  $13,000 
F-54

21.Subsequent Events

In accordance with the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” the Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2009 up through September 1, 2009, the date the Company issued these consolidated financial statements.  Based on that evaluation, we have determined no material events or transactions occurred after June 30, 2009 up through September 1, 2009 that would affect the June 30, 2009 consolidated financial statements.

22. 
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):

(In thousands)
  Quarter  Year Ended 
2009 First  Second  Third  Fourth  June 30, 
                
Net sales $140,845  $156,815  $139,439  $162,237  $599,336 
Gross profit  67,359   73,159   66,605   77,982   285,105 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (6,897)  (4,107)  (13,734)  (51,950)  (76,688)

  Quarter  Year Ended 
2008 First  Second  Third  Fourth  June 30, 
                
Net sales $140,236  $160,757  $157,304  $184,915  $643,212 
Gross profit  52,615   54,633   69,236   90,914   267,398 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (63,944)  (29,068)  (15,437)  (6,563)  (115,012)

Note:  We are not presenting per share data here as we currently only have one shareholder.

F-50F-55

AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTSThe Company and its Sale
(
Aeroflex Incorporated and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, or “our”) design, engineer and manufacture microelectronics and test solution and measurement equipment that are sold primarily to the broadband communications, aerospace and defense markets. Our fiscal year ends on June 30.

On August 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by affiliates of or funds managed by The Veritas Capital Fund Ill, L.P. (“Veritas”), Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc. (“Golden Gate”) and GS Direct, L.L.C. (“GS Direct”) and certain members of management (“the Merger”) (see Note 3).

Presentation and Use of Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. We consolidate our subsidiaries, all of which, except for Test Evolution Corporation (see Note 4), are wholly owned. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements presented as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and for the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 represent the Company subsequent to its acquisition (the “Successor” or “Successor Entity”), whereas the consolidated financial statements as of and for periods prior to August 15, 2007 represent the Company prior to the Merger (the “Predecessor” or “Predecessor Entity”). The purchase method of accounting was applied effective August 15, 2007 in connection with the Merger. Therefore, our consolidated financial statements for periods before August 15, 2007 are presented on a different basis than those for the periods after August 14, 2007 and, as such, are not comparable.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires that management of the Company make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among the more significant estimates included in our consolidated financial statements are revenue and cost recognition under long-term contracts; the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories, investments and deferred tax assets; the depreciable lives of fixed assets and useful lives of amortizable intangible assets; the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations; the recoverability of long-lived amortizable intangible assets, tradenames and goodwill; share-based compensation; restructuring charges; asset retirement obligations; fair value measurement of financial assets and liabilities and certain accrued expenses and contingencies.

We are subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic, environmental and political factors and changes in the business climate; therefore, actual results may differ from those estimates. When no estimate in a given range is deemed to be better than any other when estimating contingent liabilities, the low end of the range is accrued. Accordingly, the accounting estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made when circumstances warrant them. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments having maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition are considered to be cash equivalents.

Marketable Securities
Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholder’s equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in market value judged to be other than temporary, of which there were none, for the three years ended June 30, 2009, are included in other income (expense). Interest income and dividends are also included in other income.

At June 30, 2009, our marketable securities consisted of $17.7 million of auction rate securities, which is net of a $2.3 million valuation allowance. Auction rate securities represent long-term (generally maturities of ten years to thirty-five years from the date of issuance) variable rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates that are reset through an auction process, which occurs every seven to thirty-five days, and are classified as available for sale securities. All but one (with the one security having a carrying value of $1.7 million and an A rating) of our auction rate securities retain a triple-A rating by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. In thousands)addition, certain of our auction rate securities are backed by student loans whose principal and interest are federally guaranteed by the Family Federal Education Loan Program.  We have collected all interest payments on all of our auction rate securities when due and since early February 2008 (when auctions began to fail) have redeemed $27.5 million of auction rate securities at par, including $1.0 million redeemed at par in July 2009.

At June 30, 2009, the par value of our auction rate securities was $19.9 million; however we have estimated that the fair value of our auction rate securities as of that date was $17.7 million.  Since many auctions are failing and given that there is currently no active secondary market for our investment in auction rate securities, the determination of fair value was based on the following factors:

·continuing illiquidity;
·lack of action by the issuers to establish different forms of financing to replace or redeem these securities; and
·the credit quality of the underlying securities.

As fair values have continued to be below cost, we have considered various factors in determining whether a credit loss exists and whether to recognize an other than temporary impairment charge, including the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below the cost basis, the timely receipt of all interest payments, the rating of the security, the relatively low volatility of the security’s fair value, the current financial condition of the issuer and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

Auction rate securities are classified as non-current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Inventories

Inventories, including amounts related to long-term contracts accounted for under percentage-of-completion accounting, are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.
F-8
Financial Instruments and Derivatives

Foreign currency contracts are used in certain circumstances to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates. We enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges. Thus the change in fair value is included in income as it occurs, within other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations.
Our interest rate swap derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges. As such, they are recorded on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities at their fair value, with changes in the fair value of such derivatives, net of taxes, recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

For arrangements other than certain long-term contracts, revenue (including shipping and handling fees) is recognized when products are shipped and title has passed to the customer. If title does not pass until the product reaches the customer’s delivery site, recognition of the revenue is deferred until that time. Certain of our sales are to distributors which have a right to return some portion of product within up to eighteen months of sale. We recognize revenue on these sales at the time of shipment to the distributor, as the returns under these arrangements have been insignificant and can be reasonably estimated. A provision for such estimated returns is recorded at the time sales are recognized.

Long-term contracts are accounted for in accordance with SOP 81-1 “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.”  We determine estimated contract profit rates and use the percentage-of-completion method to recognize revenues and associated costs as work progresses on certain long-term contracts. We measure the extent of progress toward completion generally based upon one of the following methods (based upon an assessment of which method most closely aligns to the underlying earnings process): (i) the units-of-delivery method, (ii) the cost-to-cost method, using the ratio of contract costs incurred as a percentage of total estimated costs at contract completion (based upon engineering and production estimates), or (iii) the achievement of contractual milestones. Provisions for anticipated losses or revisions in estimated profits on contracts-in-process are recorded in the period in which such anticipated losses or revisions become evident.

Revenue from sales of products where software is other than incidental to their performance, including related software support and maintenance contracts is recognized in accordance with SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” Accordingly, revenue for software is recognized when the software is delivered, if all of the above criteria for revenue recognition are met.

When a customer purchases software together with post contract support, we allocate a portion of the fee to the post contract support for its fair value based on the contractual renewal rate or the amount the support is sold for on a standalone basis. Post contract support fees are deferred in Advance Payments by Customers and Deferred Revenue in the consolidated balance sheets, and recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the related contract.

Acquisition Accounting

We use the purchase method to account for business combinations, whereby the total cost of an acquisition is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price is dependent upon certain valuations and other studies, which contain estimates and assumptions.
F-9
Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the cost of purchased businesses over the fair value of their underlying net assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of tradenames. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized. Definite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of customer related intangibles and developed technology, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging up to 11 years.  
We assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles at least annually for impairment as of June 30, or more frequently if certain events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred.  We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is one level below our operating segments.  We identify our reporting units by assessing whether the components of our operating segments constitute businesses for which discrete financial information is available and management of each reporting unit regularly reviews the operating results of those components.  Impairment testing is performed in two steps: (i) we determine if there is an impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, and (ii) if there is an impairment, we measure the amount of impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill (the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the fair value of its net identifiable assets) with the carrying amount of that goodwill.  The impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets encompasses calculating a fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and comparing the fair value to its carrying value.  If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, impairment is recorded.
Testing goodwill for impairment requires us to estimate fair values of reporting units using significant estimates and assumptions.  The assumptions made will impact the outcome and ultimate results of the testing.  We use industry accepted valuation models and set criteria that are reviewed and approved by various levels of management and, in certain instances, we engage third-party valuation specialists to assist us in estimating fair values.  To determine fair value of the reporting unit, we generally use an income approach.  We use a market approach to assess the reasonableness of the results of the income approach.
Under the income approach, we determine fair value using a discounted cash flow method, estimating future cash flows of each reporting unit, as well as terminal value, and discounting such cash flows at a rate of return that reflects the relative risk of the cash flows.
The key estimates and factors used in the income approach include, but are not limited to, revenue growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts, terminal value and the weighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows. The fiscal 2009 compound annual growth rate of sales for the first 6 years of our projections ranged between 4% and 24%.  The fiscal 2008 compound annual growth rate of sales for the first 6 years of our projections ranged between 1% and 15%. The terminal growth rates were projected at 5% after between 7 to 10 years in fiscal 2009 as compared with 5% after between 9 to 11 years in fiscal 2008, which reflects our estimate of long term market and gross domestic product growth.  The weighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows ranged from 14% to 19% in fiscal 2009 as compared with 13% to 16% in fiscal 2008.  Future changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the results of our reviews for impairment of goodwill.  Changes in the valuation assumptions from those used in the prior year primarily reflect the impact of the current economic environment on the reporting units and their projected future results of operations.
To determine fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, we use an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method.  This method assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to obtain the rights to use the comparable asset.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets’ fair values require significant judgments in determining both the assets’ estimated cash flows as well as the appropriate discount and royalty rates applied to those cash flows to determine fair value.  Changes in such estimates or the application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results.
F-10
We review other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  When such events or changes in circumstances occur, a recoverability test is performed comparing projected undiscounted cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of an asset or asset group to its carrying value.  If the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment would be recorded for the excess of the carrying value over the fair value, which is determined by discounting future cash flows.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, principally on a straight-line basis. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease, including anticipated renewals, or the estimated life of the asset, whichever is shorter.

Research and Development Costs

We charge all research and development costs to expense as incurred, except those of our software products for which costs incurred between the date of product technological feasibility and the date that the software is available for general release are capitalized. We use a working model of the software or a detailed program design to assess technological feasibility. We capitalized software development costs of $209,000, $1.2 million, $0 and $593,000, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively. Capitalized software development costs are amortized to cost of sales based on the higher of a) the percentage of revenue for units delivered to total anticipated revenue for the related product, or b) on a straight-line basis.  Capitalized software development costs of $328,000 and $1.2 million were included in other assets at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Income Taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Share Based Compensation

The fair value of share based payments is recognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the related vesting periods.  Share based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the portion of share based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest and has therefore been reduced for estimated forfeitures at the time of the grant, with subsequent revisions for the differences between actual and the estimated forfeiture rates.

Foreign Currency Translations

The financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are measured in their local currency and then translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method. Under the current rate method, assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates prevailing throughout the year.

Gains and losses resulting from the translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) and presented as part of stockholder’s equity. Realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains (losses) from the settlement of foreign currency transactions are reflected in other income (expense) and amounted to $9.0 million, $2.3 million, $193,000 and $(1.3 million) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

F-11
Column A Column B  Column C  Column D  Column E 
     Additions       
        Charged       
  Balance at  Charged to  to other     Balance at 
  beginning of  costs and  accounts -  Deductions -  end of 
Description period  expenses  describe  describe  period 
                
PERIOD FROM AUGUST 15, 2007               
  THROUGH JUNE 30, 2008 (SUCCESSOR ENTITY)
               
                
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,531  $1,295  $-  $143(B) $2,683 
                     
PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2007                    
  THROUGH AUGUST 14, 2007 (PREDECESSOR ENTITY)                    
                     
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,589  $(33) $-  $25(B) $1,531 
                     
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2007:
                    
                     
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,273  $416  $25(A) $125(B) $1,589 
                     
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2006:
                    
                     
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,118  $292  $-  $137(B) $1,273 
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income (loss) and equity adjustments relating to foreign currency translation, changes in fair value of certain derivatives and non-current marketable securities and adjustments to the minimum pension liability and is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Note:   (A) - - AcquiredRecently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” to clarify the definition of fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value and expand the disclosures on fair value measurements.  SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in purchasean orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price).  SFAS No. 157 also stipulates that, as a market-based measurement, fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (a) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of businesses.the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (b) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). This statement became effective for us on July 1, 2008 with respect to financial assets and liabilities.  The additional disclosures required by SFAS No. 157 are included in Note 10.
 (B) - Net write-offs
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date for FASB Statement No. 157.”  This FSP permits the delayed application of uncollectible amounts.SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, as defined in this FSP, except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least annually, until the beginning of our fiscal 2010.  As of July 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 (see Note 10), with the exception of its application to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which we deferred in accordance with FSP No. FAS 157-2.  We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS No. 157 at the beginning of fiscal 2010 for such nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157 when there has been a significant decrease in market activity for a financial asset or liability in relation to normal activity and circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. An entity is required to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was distressed on the weight of the evidence presented.  This FSP also re-affirms that the objective of fair value, when the market for an asset is not active, is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly market (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction).  Additional enhanced disclosures are also required in accordance with this FSP.  FSP No. FAS 157-4 became effective for us for the quarter ending June 30, 2009.  The adoption of FSP No. FAS 157-4 applied to our auction rate securities and did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements (see Note 10). 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” to permit all entities to choose to elect, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value.  An entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date, and recognize upfront costs and fees related to those items in earnings as incurred and not deferred.  SFAS No. 159 became effective for us as of July 1, 2008.  As we did not elect the fair value option for our financial instruments (other than those already measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157), the adoption of this Statement did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
F-51F-12
 

AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
AND SUBSIDIARIESIn April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” principally to require publicly traded companies to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements.  FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 became effective for us during our quarter ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this disclosure-only guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIn April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (“FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2”).  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 provides additional guidance on the timing of impairment recognition and greater clarity about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold.  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 also requires additional disclosures about impairments in interim and annual reporting periods.  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 became effective for us during our quarter ending June 30, 2009.  The adoption of FSP No. FAS 115/124-2 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Among other changes, under SFAS No. 141(R), the fair value of contingent consideration would be recorded on the acquisition date.  SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for acquisitions consummated by us on or after July 1, 2009.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies,” to require that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably determined.  If the fair value of such assets or liabilities cannot be reasonably determined, then they would generally be recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” and FASB Interpretation No. 14, “Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5.”  This FSP also amends the subsequent accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination and certain other disclosure requirements.  This FSP is effective for us for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations that are consummated on or after July 1, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51.” SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the provisions of SFAS No. 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

F-13
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.”  This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This FSP also adds certain disclosures to those already prescribed in SFAS No. 142.  This FSP becomes effective for the annual and interim periods within the year, beginning in our fiscal 2010. The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date.  The adoption of this FSP is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements when adopted on July 1, 2009.
In November 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on EITF Issue No. 08-6, “Accounting for Equity Method Investment Considerations.”  EITF No. 08-6 addresses questions about the potential effect of SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160 on equity-method accounting.  The primary issues include how the initial carrying value of an equity method investment should be determined, how to account for any subsequent purchases and sales of additional ownership interests, and whether the investor must separately assess its underlying share of the investee’s indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment.  The adoption of EITF No. 08-6 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements because we have no equity method investments and is effective on a prospective basis beginning in our fiscal 2010.  The adoption date of EITF No. 08-6 coincides with that of SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160. 
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162,” which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP.  This Statement explicitly recognizes the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  The adoption of this Statement will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements when adopted in our quarter ending September 30, 2009.

2.          Discontinued Operations

As a result of continued operating losses, in June 2007 our then Board of Directors approved a formal plan to divest our radar business (“Radar”) and to seek a strategic buyer. This business had previously been included in the Test Solutions segment.  As a result of this decision, the operating results of Radar, net of taxes, had been classified in the consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented and we recorded a $1.6 million ($1.0 million, net of tax) impairment charge in June 2007 based upon appraisals of the business performed by third parties, which resulted in the write-off of $771,000 of goodwill and $322,000 of equipment, with the balance reducing inventory. We recorded further losses on disposal of $3.7 million ($2.4 million, net of tax) in the predecessor period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, to reflect the net assets of Radar at their net realizable value based on the May 15, 2008 sale of the business for $750,000. The sale agreement provided for additional contingent consideration, which was not included in the calculation of the loss on disposal as realization was not probable.

F-14

Net sales and income (loss) from discontinued operations (including impairment charges), which were solely related to Radar, were as follows:

        Fiscal Year 
  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
          
Net sales $893  $120  $6,422 
             
Income (loss) from discontinued            
operations before income taxes $(5,928) $(3,861) $(6,041)
Income tax (benefit)  (1,107)  (1,353)  (2,173)
Income (loss) from            
discontinued operations $(4,821) $(2,508) $(3,868)

3.         Company Sale Transaction

On March 2, 2007, we entered into an agreement to be acquired by investment entities affiliated with General Atlantic LLC and Francisco Partners II, L.P. (“GA” and “Francisco”). The agreement contained a provision under which we were permitted to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties through April 18, 2007.  In the event we accepted a superior proposal received prior to April 19, 2007, a breakup fee of $15 million plus up to $7.5 million of expenses would be payable by the Company. On May 25, 2007, upon entering into the merger agreement described below, we provided a letter of termination to affiliates of GA and Francisco that the merger with them was terminated (“Terminated Merger”).  In connection with such termination, we paid a $22.5 million breakup fee, as we determined that the acquisition proposal, that resulted in the merger agreement, constituted a superior proposal.

On June 4, 2007, an affiliate of GA and Francisco filed an action against us alleging, among other things, that we breached the terminated merger agreement by paying GA and Francisco a breakup fee of $22.5 million instead of $37.5 million that GA and Francisco contended they were owed. We settled this action for $2.5 million in January 2008, which is reflected in the results of operations for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007.

On August 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by and merged with AX Acquisition Corp. (“AX Acquisition”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AX Holding Corp. (the “Parent”), (the “Merger”).  Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and each share of common stock of the Company then outstanding was converted into a right to receive $14.50 in cash. Therefore, on August 15, 2007 each holder of shares of our common stock no longer had any rights with respect to the shares, except for the right to receive the merger consideration. The merger agreement also provided that all of our stock options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment equal to the number of shares of our common stock underlying the options multiplied by the amount, if any, by which $14.50 exceeded the exercise price of the option, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. The aggregate merger consideration paid to our shareholders and stock option holders was approximately $1.1 billion.

The Merger was funded by a $378.4 million equity investment in Parent by Veritas, Golden Gate and GS Direct (collectively, the “Sponsors”) and certain members of our management.  In addition, primarily in order to finance the Merger, on August 15, 2007 the Company entered into a $575 million senior secured credit facility, which consisted of $525 million of term loans and a $50 million revolving credit facility, and two exchangeable senior unsecured credit facilities totaling $345 million (see Note 11).

F-15

Upon the closing of the Merger, we paid severance of approximately $6.7 million, $18.6 million of Merger transaction expenses, a $22 million advisory fee to the Sponsors or their affiliates and $18.3 million in financing costs.

Upon consummation of the Merger, we entered into a new employment agreement with one of our officers that, in addition to specified annual remuneration and bonuses, provided for a one-time bonus of $887,000 which was recorded as compensation expense in the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, plus $3.7 million for a covenant not to compete which is being amortized over the seven year term, both of which were paid in January 2008.

At the closing of the Merger, we entered into an advisory agreement with the Sponsors or their designated affiliates under which the Sponsors will provide certain advisory services to us.  We will pay an annual advisory fee in the aggregate amount of the greater of $2.2 million, or 1.8% of adjusted EBITDA for the prior fiscal year, as defined in the agreement, and transaction fees on all future financings and liquidity events. The advisory agreement has an initial term expiring on December 31, 2013 and will be automatically renewable for additional one year terms thereafter unless we or the Sponsors give notice of non-renewal.  The annual advisory fees paid amounted to $2.3 million and $2.1 million during the year ended June 30, 2009 and the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, respectively.

In connection with the Merger and Terminated Merger, for the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, we incurred company sale transaction and related expenses that we expensed as incurred of $32.5 million, $3.7 million and $30.6 million, respectively, consisting primarily of merger-related severance and other change of control related payments, a merger termination fee and the related lawsuit settlement charge and legal and other professional fees (“Company Sale Transaction expenses”).

The Merger constituted a change in control of the Company. The Company recorded its assets and liabilities at fair value as of the date of the Merger, whereby the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Independent third-party appraisers were engaged to assist management and perform valuations of certain of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.

We allocated the purchase price, including the acquisition costs of approximately $22.9 million, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $45.5 million) $335,252 
Property, plant and equipment  111,804 
Other assets  16,537 
Developed technology  195,500 
Customer related intangible assets  211,582 
Other acquired intangible assets  6,290 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives (tradenames)  122,870 
Goodwill  452,756 
In-process research and development  24,340 
Total assets acquired  1,476,931 
Current liabilities  (137,751)
Long-term liabilities  (220,887)
Total liabilities assumed  (358,638)
Net assets acquired $1,118,293 
F-16

At the acquisition date, the acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) was not considered to have reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future uses. Therefore, the fair value of the IPR&D of $24.3 million was expensed at the time of the acquisition in operating costs. The allocation to IPR&D represents the estimated fair value of such incomplete research and development, at the acquisition date, based on future cash flows.  As of the acquisition date, cash flows from these projects were expected to commence in fiscal year 2009. In determining the fair values of IPR&D, risk adjusted discount rates that ranged from 17% to 25% were applied to the projects’ cash flows, which have taken into account the respective projects’ completion percentage.

The unaudited pro forma results of operations presented below for the period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 are presented as though the Merger had occurred on July 1, 2006, after giving effect to purchase accounting adjustments relating to depreciation and amortization of the revalued assets, interest expense associated with the new credit facilities and other acquisition-related adjustments in connection with the Merger and our acquisition of MicroMetrics (which was consummated on April 12, 2007) as if it occurred on July 1, 2006. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the combined results that would have occurred had the Merger been consummated at July 1, 2006, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.

  Period from  Fiscal Year 
  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
       
Net sales $38,178  $598,241 
Net income (loss) $(27,554) $(123,105)

4.         Acquisition of Businesses and Intangible Assets

MicroMetrics, Inc.

On April 12, 2007, we purchased the outstanding stock of MicroMetrics, Inc. (“MMI”) for $9.9 million of cash and repaid approximately $700,000 of MMI’s bank debt.  MMI, located in New Hampshire, is a design and full service manufacturer of both standard and application specific RF/Microwave diodes and semiconductor devices. MMI strengthens our high-reliability, high-performance RF/Microwave product portfolio of semiconductor solutions.  MMI is included in our Microelectronic Solutions segment.

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $72,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $9,000) $3,250 
Property, plant and equipment  1,147 
Customer related intangibles  2,600 
Non-compete arrangements  590 
Tradenames  70 
Goodwill  4,633 
Total assets acquired  12,290 
Current liabilities  (1,619)
Long term debt  (8)
Total liabilities assumed  (1,627)
Net assets acquired $10,663 
F-17
The customer related intangibles and non-compete arrangements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 2 to 9.5 years.  The tradenames have an indefinite life.  The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

On a pro forma basis, had the MMI acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Test Evolution Corporation

On October 1, 2007, we purchased 40% of the outstanding stock of Test Evolution Corporation (“TEC”) for $4.0 million ($2.0 million at closing and $2.0 million paid in October 2008). TEC, located in Massachusetts, develops and manufactures digital, analog and RF semiconductor automated test equipment. We have determined that we have control of this company and have consolidated TEC’s assets and liabilities and results of operations, all of which were insignificant, into our financial statements commencing October 1, 2007. The non-controlling interest of 60% in each of the equity and operations of TEC are not material to our consolidated financial statements and have been included in other long-term liabilities and other income (expense), respectively.  TEC is included in our Test Solutions segment.

Gaisler Research AB

On June 30, 2008, we acquired the stock of Gaisler Research AB (“Gaisler”) for $12.3 million cash (net of $2.7 million cash acquired), plus up to another $15 million over the next three years provided specified EBITDA targets are achieved. Gaisler achieved the fiscal year 2009 EBITDA target, and as such, an additional $4 million will be paid to the selling shareholders in October 2009, which has been added to goodwill in the accompanying June 30, 2009 consolidated balance sheet. Located in Sweden, Gaisler provides integrated circuit software products and services to European space system suppliers, plus other U.S., Japanese and Russian space agencies. Gaisler is included in our Microelectronic Solutions segment.

We allocated the purchase price, including the $4 million of earned contingent consideration and acquisition costs of approximately $432,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $2.7 million) $987 
Property, plant and equipment  62 
Developed technology  7,550 
Customer related intangibles  1,030 
Non-compete arrangements  1,820 
Tradenames  1,190 
Goodwill  6,122 
In-process research and development  2,300 
Total assets acquired  21,061 
Current liabilities  (1,076)
Deferred taxes  (3,245)
Total liabilities assumed  (4,321)
Net assets acquired $16,740 

The developed technology, customer related intangibles, non-compete arrangements, and tradenames are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 8 years.  The goodwill is not  deductible for tax purposes.

F-18
On a pro forma basis, had the Gaisler acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

VI Technology, Inc.

On March 4, 2009, we acquired 100% of the stock of VI Technology, Inc. (“VI Tech”).  We paid $5.0 million in cash for approximately 29% of the stock of VI Tech, and the remaining approximately 71% of VI Tech stock was acquired by a limited liability company (“parent LLC”), that is our ultimate parent, in exchange for Class A membership interests in parent LLC with a fair value of $12.7 million.  Immediately following the consummation of these transactions, parent LLC contributed the 71% of VI Tech stock to the Company, giving us 100% ownership in VI Tech.  VI Tech, located in Austin, Texas, designs and manufactures independent automated test systems.  VI Tech is included in our Test Solutions segment.

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $407,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $107,000) $3,022 
Property, plant and equipment  149 
Other assets  37 
Developed technology  2,990 
Customer related intangibles  4,470 
Non-compete arrangements  1,600 
Tradenames  1,190 
Goodwill  10,501 
Total assets acquired  23,959 
Current liabilities  (1,878)
Deferred taxes  (4,081)
Total liabilities assumed  (5,959)
Net assets acquired $18,000 

The developed technology, customer related intangibles, non-compete arrangements, and tradenames are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 6 years.  The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

On a pro forma basis, had the VI Tech acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Airflyte Electronics Company

On June 26, 2009, we acquired the net assets of Airflyte Electronics Company (“Airflyte”) for $11.0 million cash plus up to another $3 million provided specified EBITDA targets are achieved in fiscal 2010.  Airflyte, located in Naples, Florida, designs and manufactures custom-engineered slip rings for high-performance defense, commercial and industrial applications. Airflyte is included in our Microelectronic Solutions segment.

F-19

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $270,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets $4,724 
Property, plant and equipment  76 
Other assets  47 
Customer related intangibles  4,020 
Tradenames  1,200 
Goodwill  1,758 
Total assets acquired  11,825 
Current liabilities assumed  (555)
Net assets acquired $11,270 

The customer related intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 6 years.  The tradenames have an indefinite life.  The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

On a pro forma basis, had the Airflyte acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Intangible Assets with Definite Lives

The components of amortizable intangible assets are as follows:

  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008 
  (Successor)  (Successor) 
  (In thousands) 
             
  Gross     Gross    
  Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying  Accumulated 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amortization 
             
Developed technology $197,684  $62,021  $198,420  $29,631 
Customer related intangibles  216,956   69,339   213,232   42,433 
Non-compete arrangements  10,090   2,692   6,290   1,012 
Tradenames  2,105   230   -   - 
Total $426,835  $134,282  $417,942  $73,076 

The aggregate amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets was $63.0 million, $73.1 million, $1.7 million and $13.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, for the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years ending June 30, is as follows:

  (In thousands) 
    
2010 $61,949 
2011  60,748 
2012  60,479 
2013  54,525 
2014  27,833 
F-20
Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual impairment test of indefinite lived intangible assets and, due to a decline in the Radar Frequency Microwave reporting unit’s (“RFMW”)  operating results during fiscal 2009 and additional revisions to internal forecasts, we wrote-off approximately $6.0 million of tradenames with indefinite lives related to the RFMW reporting unit.

Goodwill

The carrying amount of goodwill is as follows:

  AMS  ATS  Total 
  (In thousands) 
          
Balance at June 30, 2007 (predecessor entity) $51,321  $130,641  $181,962 
Goodwill adjustment recorded in purchase            
accounting from allocation of purchase price (1)
  243,456   27,373   270,829 
Balance at August 15, 2007 (successor entity)  294,777   158,014   452,791 
Acquisition of Test Evolution Corporation  -   1,868   1,868 
Acquisition of Gaisler  8,261   -   8,261 
Impact of foreign currency translation  (268)  (1,497)  (1,765)
Balance at June 30, 2008 (successor entity)  302,770   158,385   461,155 
Final adjustment to goodwill related to the Merger  494   (529)  (35)
Adjustment to goodwill for acquisitions (2)
  (4,206)  10,501   6,295 
Gaisler 2009 earned contingent consideration  4,000   -   4,000 
Impairment of goodwill  (35,200)  -   (35,200)
Impact of foreign currency translation  (1,045)  (7,037)  (8,082)
Balance at June 30, 2009 (successor entity) $266,813  $161,320  $428,133 

INDEX(1)PAGE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSF-53
September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSF-54
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Periods from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
and August 15, 2007 to September 30, 2007
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSF-55
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Periods from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
and August 15, 2007 to September 30, 2007
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-56  –  F-81The predecessor entity goodwill has been written off in purchase accounting for the Merger.
(2)Goodwill in the AMS segment was adjusted primarily due to the finalization of purchase accounting for the Gaisler acquisition in the amount of $(6.2) million offset by goodwill recorded for the Airflyte acquisition of $1.8 million. Goodwill in the ATS segment was adjusted due to purchase accounting for the VI Tech acquisition in the amount of $10.5 million.
F-52
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual impairment test of goodwill and, due to a decline in the RFMW reporting unit’s operating results and additional revisions to internal forecasts during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge related to the RFMW reporting unit of $35.2 million.

5.      Restructuring Charges

In fiscal 2007, we initiated and completed restructuring activity in the Wireless division of our Test Solutions businesses in the United Kingdom.  Pursuant to the plan, 23 employees were terminated, resulting in $1.4 million of severance costs, and certain contract positions were eliminated.  We also abandoned a leased facility and recorded a fixed asset impairment charge, which in the aggregate amounted to $1.3 million.  During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, we recorded approximately $2.8 million in restructuring costs including the write-off of $753,000 of net fixed assets, all in research and development costs except for $35,000 allocated to selling, general and administrative costs, and all of which was paid as of June 30, 2007.

F-21

In fiscal 2008, we initiated additional actions to restructure our U.K. business units by further consolidating our manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative activities. In addition, we initiated a restructuring in our Whippany, New Jersey, component manufacturing facility to address a slowdown in sales of its integrated products line.  These actions resulted in the termination of approximately 120 employees, which resulted in restructuring costs, principally severance, for the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 of $7.0 million ($987,000 in cost of sales, $2.1 million in selling, general and administrative costs and $3.9 million in research and development costs) and $3.8 million ($1.6 million in selling, general and administrative costs and $2.2 million in research and development costs), respectively. Substantially all of the workforce reduction costs were paid prior to June 30, 2008. Facility closure costs include $2.6 million of accrued contractual commitments under operating leases for two facilities in the U.K. that we exited in May 2008, which will be paid through December 2010. Included in the restructuring costs was approximately $485,000 of fixed asset impairment charges that were recorded in selling, general and administrative costs in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 for the write-off of leasehold improvements in the abandoned facilities.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, in connection with continued restructuring activities of certain manufacturing operations, we incurred $3.8 million of severance costs for an additional 103 employees terminated primarily in our U.K. business unit and $294,000 of facility closure costs ($2.9 million in cost of sales, $686,000 in selling, general and administrative costs and $496,000 in research and development costs).

The following table sets forth the charges and payments related to the restructuring liability for the periods indicated:


Aeroflex Incorporated
and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands except share and per share data)
  Balance           Balance 
  June 30,     June 30, 
  
2008
  
Year Ended June 30, 2009
  
2009
 
     (Successor)    
           Effect of    
  Restructuring        foreign  Restructuring 
  
Liability
  
Net Additions
  
Cash Payments
  
currency
  
Liability
 
  (In thousands) 
Work force               
reduction $12  $3,808  $(3,092) $28  $756 
                     
Closure of                    
facilities  3,242   294   (1,166)  (648)  1,722 
                     
Total $3,254  $4,102  $(4,258) $(620) $2,478 

  September 30,  June 30, 
   2008  2008 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity 
Assets      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $73,066  $54,149 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful        
accounts of $2,829 and $2,683  110,297   147,983 
Inventories  136,977   134,891 
Deferred income taxes  26,460   27,039 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  12,445   12,184 
Total current assets  359,245   376,246 
         
Property, plant and equipment, net  101,349   104,649 
Non-current marketable securities  18,755   19,960 
Deferred financing costs, net  29,435   30,185 
Other assets  15,141   18,560 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  321,760   344,866 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives  120,051   123,378 
Goodwill  456,193   461,155 
         
Total assets $1,421,929  $1,478,999 
         
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity        
Current liabilities:        
Current portion of long-term debt $5,570  $5,574 
Accounts payable  31,882   39,382 
Advance payments by customers and deferred revenue  18,997   27,144 
Income taxes payable  2,097   1,936 
Accrued payroll expenses  25,754   24,525 
         
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  58,767   56,830 
Total current liabilities  143,067   155,391 
Long-term debt  875,813   873,237 
Deferred income taxes  143,491   159,457 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,156   6,263 
Other long-term liabilities  7,470   8,003 
Total liabilities  1,175,997   1,202,351 
         
Stockholder's equity:        
Common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 1,000        
  shares; issued and outstanding 1,000 shares  -   - 
Additional paid-in capital  382,214   381,666 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  (23,960)  407 
Accumulated deficit  (112,322)  (105,425)
Total stockholder's equity  245,932   276,648 
         
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $1,421,929  $1,478,999 
     
Year Ended June 30, 20 08
       
  Balance  July 1,  August 15,  July 1,  August 15,     Balance 
  June 30,  2007 to  2007 to  2007 to  2007 to     June 30, 
  
2007
  August 14,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30,  Effect of  
2008
 
  Restructuring  2007  2008  2007  2008  foreign  Restructuring 
  
Liability
  
Net Additions
  
Cash Payments
  
currency
  
Liability
 
     
Predecessor
  
Successor
  
Predecessor
  
Successor
       
        (In thousands)          
Work force                     
reduction $-  $3,778  $3,270  $(1,186) $(5,850) $-  $12 
                             
Closure of                            
facilities  -   -   3,230   -   -   12   3,242 
                             
Total $-  $3,778  $6,500  $(1,186) $(5,850) $12  $3,254 
F-22

6. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

  June 30,  June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  Successor  Successor 
  (In thousands) 
       
Raw materials $67,388  $64,533 
Work in process  47,185   41,056 
Finished goods  21,030   29,302 
  $135,603  $134,891 

7.  Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

  June 30, Estimated
  2009  2008 Useful Life
  Successor  Successor In Years
  (In thousands)  
        
Land $16,846  $17,120  
Buildings and leasehold improvements  32,461   31,541 1 to 40
Machinery and equipment  79,836   63,469 2 to 12
Furniture and fixtures  13,836   12,925 2 to 10
   142,979   125,055  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  42,072   20,406  
  $100,907  $104,649  

Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment was $21.4 million, $20.0 million, $2.0 million and $17.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, for the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

8.        Product Warranty
We warrant our products against defects in design, materials and workmanship, generally for one year from their date of shipment. A provision for estimated future costs relating to these warranties is recorded when the related revenue is recognized and is included in cost of sales. Quarterly we analyze our warranty liability for reasonableness based on a 15-month history of warranty costs incurred, the nature of the products shipped subject to warranty and anticipated warranty trends.

F-23
Activity related to our product warranty liability, which is reflected in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, was as follows:

  Fiscal Year       
   Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to 
   June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007 
   Successor  Successor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
          
Balance at beginning of period $2,944  $3,002  $2,929 
Provision for warranty obligations  3,081   2,192   469 
Cost of warranty obligations  (3,207)  (2,259)  (394)
Foreign currency impact  (173)  9   (2)
Balance at end of period $2,645  $2,944  $3,002 

9.        Derivative Financial Instruments

We adopted SFAS No. 161 “Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” as of January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements as it is a disclosure-only standard. We address certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. We enter into interest rate swap derivatives to manage the effects of interest rate movements on portions of our debt. We also enter into foreign currency forward contracts, not designated as hedging instruments, to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates.

The fair values of our derivative financial instruments included in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 are presented as follows:

  Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives 
  Balance Sheet   Balance Sheet   
(In thousands) Location 
Fair Value(1)
 Location 
Fair Value(1)
 
Derivatives designated as hedging         
   instruments:         
   Interest rate swap contracts     Other long-term   
  Not applicable $-    liabilities $15,621 
            
Derivatives not designated as hedging           
   instruments:           
   Foreign currency forward contracts      Accrued expenses and    
  Not applicable  -    other current liabilities  195 
            
          Total Derivatives   $-   $15,816 
(1) See Note 10 for further information about how the fair values of derivative assets and liabilities are determined.
F-24
The amounts of the gains and losses related to our derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:

    Location of Gain or (Loss) Amount of Gain or (Loss) 
  Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Reclassified from 
  Recognized in OCI on Derivative Accumulated OCI into Accumulated OCI into 
(In thousands) 
(Effective Portion) (1)
 Income (Effective Portion) Income (Effective Portion) 
  Fiscal Year   Fiscal Year 
Derivatives in Cash Flow Ended   Ended 
Hedging Relationships June 30, 2009   June 30, 2009 
        
Interest rate swap contracts $(17,862) Interest expense $(7,061) 

(1)  See Note 13 for additional information on changes to other accumulated comprehensive income (loss).

The amounts of the gains and losses related to our derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:

  Location of Gain or (Loss) Amount of Gain or (Loss) 
  Recognized in Earnings on Recognized in Earnings on 
(In thousands) Derivative Derivative 
    Fiscal Year 
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging   Ended 
Instruments:   June 30, 2009 
      
Foreign currency forward contracts Other income (expense) $(208) 

Interest Rate Swap Cash-Flow Hedges

We enter into interest rate swap contracts to manage the effects of interest rate movements on portions of our debt. Such contracts effectively fix the borrowing rates on floating rate debt to limit the exposure against the risk of rising rates.  We do not enter into interest rate swap contracts for speculative purposes and we have entered into transactions with counterparties that are rated investment grade. Our interest rate swap contracts, all of which were entered into in fiscal 2008 for an aggregate notional amount of $475 million, have varying maturities through February 2011.

Foreign Currency Contract Derivatives

Foreign currency contracts are used to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates. We enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges. The change in fair value is included in income as it occurs, within other income (expense). As of June 30, 2009, we had $30.0 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through July 31, 2009. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of the Company, but are used in the calculation of cash settlements under the contracts.

10.     Fair Value Measurements

We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities as of July 1, 2008 and, as of June 30, 2009, have recorded a $2.3 million valuation allowance against the cost of our auction rate securities.  SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

F-25
SFAS 157 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1:Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level 2:Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3:Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.  The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instruments valuation.

The following table presents for each hierarchy level, financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009:

  Quoted Prices in          
  Active Markets  Significant Other  Significant    
  for Identical  Observable  Unobservable    
  Assets  Inputs  Inputs    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Assets:            
Non-current marketable securities $-  $-  $17,677  $17,677 
Liabilities:                
Foreign currency forward                
contracts $-  $195  $-  $195 
Interest rate swap contracts  -   15,621   -   15,621 
Total Liabilities $-  $15,816  $-  $15,816 

The following table presents the changes in the carrying value of the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), as defined in SFAS No. 157, for the year ended June 30, 2009:

  Fair Value Measurements 
  Using Significant 
  Unobservable Inputs 
  (Level 3) 
  Auction 
  Rate 
  Securities 
  (In thousands) 
    
Balance at June 30, 2008 $- 
Transfers to Level 3  19,945 
Total unrealized losses in accumulated    
other comprehensive income (loss)  (2,268)
Balance at June 30, 2009 $17,677 

F-26

Non-Current Marketable Securities – Non-current marketable securities consist of auction rate securities that currently have no active market from which we could obtain pricing.  Since we adopted SFAS 157 on July 1, 2008, auction rate securities have been classified as Level 3 as their valuation requires substantial judgment and estimation of factors that are not currently observable in the market due to the lack of trading in the securities.  Since February 2008, when auctions for these securities began to fail, we have redeemed $27.5 million of auction rate securities at par, including $1.0 million owned at June 30, 2009, which were redeemed at par in July 2009. The $1.0 million redeemed in July 2009 are classified as non-current marketable securities as of June 30, 2009, as we were not aware at the balance sheet date that these auction rate securities would be redeemed.  To date, we have collected all interest payments on all of our auction rate securities when due. Furthermore, we have the intent and are able to hold these securities until the credit markets recover, or until their maturities, which range from 2029 through 2042, if necessary.   However, based on a discounted cash flow analysis, which considered, among other items, the collateral underlying the securities, the credit worthiness of the issuer, the timing of future cash flows and liquidity risks, we have recorded a $2.3 million valuation allowance against the auction rate securities.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts – The fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts were valued using a pricing model with all significant inputs based on observable market data such as measurement date spot and forward rates.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts – The fair value of our outstanding interest rate swap contracts were based on valuations received from the counterparties and corroborated by measurement date equivalent swap rates.

11.        Long Term Debt and Credit Agreements

On August 15, 2007, we entered into a $575 million senior secured credit facility, which consisted of $525 million of term loans and a $50 million revolving credit facility, and two exchangeable senior unsecured credit facilities totaling $345 million.  Total long term debt, outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, consists of the following:

   June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008 
   Successor  Successor 
   (In thousands) 
Revolving credit facility(a) $-  $- 
Senior secured B-1 term loan(b)  393,000   397,000 
Senior secured B-2 term loan(c)  122,813   124,063 
Total senior secured debt   515,813   521,063 
Senior unsecured notes(d)  225,000   225,000 
Senior subordinated unsecured term loan(e)  147,450   131,340 
Other   1,085   1,408 
Total debt   889,348   878,811 
Less current maturities   5,590   5,574 
Total long term debt  $883,758  $873,237 

The following is a summary of required principal repayments of our debt for the next five years and thereafter as of June 30, 2009:

Year ending June 30, (In thousands) 
2010 $5,590 
2011  5,610 
2012  5,635 
2013  5,250 
2014  5,250 
Thereafter  862,013 
  $889,348 

(a)The revolving credit facility provides for borrowings of up to $50 million through August 15, 2013 at a rate based on the LIBOR rate (3 month period) plus 325 basis points (4.125% at June 30, 2009). The senior secured credit facility allows us to utilize up to $25 million of the revolving credit facility for letters of credit and up to $5 million for a swing loan.  At June 30, 2009, there are no outstanding amounts or letters of credit issued against the facility.  Any borrowings would be secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.  We are obligated to pay a 0.5% fee on any undrawn revolver commitments.

F-27

(b)The B-1 term loan in the original amount of $400 million matures on August 15, 2014 and bears interest at a rate based on the selected LIBOR rate.  At June 30, 2009, $375 million is at the 3 month LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points (4.125% at June 30, 2009) and $18 million is at the 1 month LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points (3.625% at June 30, 2009). The B-1 term loan has scheduled quarterly repayments of $1 million that commenced December 31, 2007 and continue through June 30, 2014, with $373 million due on August 15, 2014.  The borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, excluding those of our foreign subsidiaries.

In October 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for $125 million of this loan, which expires November 15, 2010, effectively fixing the interest rate on this portion of the loan at 8.21% for that period. In April 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for an additional $250 million which expires February 15, 2011, effectively fixing the interest rate on this portion of the loan at 6.23%.  After considering the swaps, the effective interest rate on the total amount outstanding under the B-1 term loan is 6.74% at June 30, 2009.

(c)The B-2 term loan in the original amount of $125 million matures on August 15, 2014 and bears interest at a rate based on the selected LIBOR rate.  At June 30, 2009, $100 million is at the 3 month LIBOR rate plus 375 basis points (4.625% at June 30, 2009) and $23 million is at the 1 month LIBOR rate plus 375 basis points (4.125% at June 30, 2009). The B-2 term loan has scheduled quarterly repayments of $312,500 that commenced December 31, 2007 and continue through June 30, 2014, with $116.6 million due on August 15, 2014.  The borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, excluding those of our foreign subsidiaries.

In April 2008, the Company entered into two $50 million interest rate swap agreements that expire February 16, 2010 and February 15, 2011, effectively fixing the interest rate on the respective portions of the loan at 6.46% and 6.74%, respectively.  After considering the swaps, the effective interest rate on the total amount outstanding for the B-2 term loan is 6.14% at June 30, 2009.

(d)On August 7, 2008, our 11.75% exchangeable senior unsecured loan in the amount of $225 million with an ultimate maturity on February 15, 2015 was refinanced with unsecured senior notes with the same interest rate and maturity date.  We may prepay the senior notes commencing August 15, 2011 at 105.875% of the principal amount prepaid, which decreases to 102.938% on August 15, 2012 and to 100% on or after August 15, 2013.  In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal balance of the senior notes, at any time prior to August 15, 2010, with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings at 111.75% of the principal amount redeemed.  On January 21, 2009, the SEC declared effective our exchange offer registration statement which resulted in the exchange of the unregistered unsecured senior notes for publicly registered 11.75% unsecured senior notes due February 15, 2015 with substantially identical terms as the exchanged notes.

(e)The senior subordinated unsecured term loan in the original amount of $120 million bears interest at 11.75% and matures on February 15, 2015.  On September 21, 2007 we repaid an exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured loan with the proceeds from this term loan.  Interest on the loan is payable entirely by adding such interest to the unpaid principal amount of the loan through August 15, 2010, which through June 30, 2009 amounted to $27.5 million. Subsequent to August 15, 2010 interest on the term loan is payable in cash.   We may prepay the term loan commencing August 15, 2011 at 105.875% of the principal amount prepaid, which decreases to 102.9375% on August 15, 2012 and to 100% on or after August 15, 2013.

F-28

The senior secured credit facility agreement provides that if the Company sells assets (with certain exceptions) or issues new debt or equity securities to unrelated parties, the proceeds must be used to prepay term or revolving credit loans.  In addition, commencing October 1, 2008, to the extent we have consolidated excess cash flows, as defined in the senior secured credit agreement, we must use specified portions of the excess cash flows to prepay senior secured debt.

Financial covenants in the senior secured credit facility consist of a maximum leverage ratio of total debt (less up to $15 million of cash) to adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, and maximum consolidated capital expenditures. Additional covenants include restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, dividends, disposition of assets, acquisitions and transactions with shareholders and affiliates.

The senior unsecured notes and loan agreements have similar terms to the senior secured credit facility regarding mandatory prepayment events and restrictive covenants and contain no financial covenants.

As of June 30, 2009, we are in compliance with all of the covenants contained in the above described loan agreements.

In connection with the credit facilities discussed above, we capitalized deferred financing costs of  $340,000, $33.2 million and $477,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, respectively, primarily consisting of facility, legal and advisory fees.  We are amortizing these costs over the terms of the related facilities.  For the year ended June 30, 2009 and the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, we amortized $4.8 million, $3.5 million and $217,000, respectively, to interest expense.

Interest paid was $52.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2009, $53.9 million for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, $57,000 for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $674,000 for the year ended June 30, 2007.

Accrued interest of $14.0 million and $4.5 million was included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The fair value of our debt instruments are summarized as follows:

  June 30, 2009 
  Carrying  Estimated 
  Amount  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
       
Senior secured B-1 term loan $393,000  $314,400 
Senior secured B-2 term loan  122,813   84,741 
Senior unsecured notes  225,000   173,250 
Senior subordinated unsecured term loan  147,450   88,470 
Other  1,085   1,085 
Total debt $889,348  $661,946 

The carrying value of debt of $878.8 million as of June 30, 2008 had a fair value of $804.2 million.

F-29

The estimated fair values of each of our debt instruments are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. Fair value estimates related to our debt instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information.  These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgments and therefore cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

12.           Stockholder’s Equity

Stock Repurchase Program

During fiscal 2005, our then Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program.  During fiscal 2007, a total of 1,753,838 shares were repurchased for $17.2 million and retired.

Share Based Compensation
Stock Options

All of our Predecessor Entity stock option plans were terminated on August 15, 2007. The Merger agreement provided that all stock options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment equal to the number of shares of our common stock underlying the options multiplied by that amount, if any, by which $14.50 exceeded the exercise price, without interest and less any withholding taxes.  On August 15, 2007 we paid $43.9 million to option holders to cancel all options outstanding in connection with the Merger.

Under our stock option plans that were in effect until August 15, 2007, the exercise period for all stock options did not exceed ten years from the date of grant.  Stock option grants to individuals generally became exercisable in substantially equal tranches over a service period of up to five years and the exercise price was equal to the market value of the common stock at the grant date for all plans.  We have elected to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Our stock option plans allowed employees to use shares received from the exercise of options only to satisfy the minimum tax withholding requirements.  During the fiscal year 2007 no payroll taxes on stock option exercises were withheld from employees in shares of the Company’s common stock.  In fiscal 2007, one employee tendered 55,951 previously owned common shares upon the exercise of options to pay for the exercise price.

The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted for the year ended June 30, 2007 was $7.96.  The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the year ended June 30, 2007 was $9.0 million.

The fair value of each share option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table.  Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our shares using daily price observations over a period consistent with the expected life.  Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.

We used the Securities and Exchange Commission’s safe harbor guidance in SAB 107 (the average of the vesting period and the option term) to estimate the expected life of options granted during fiscal 2007.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods similar to the expected life of the option.

F-30

Year Ended June 30,
2007
Weighted average expected stock price volatility66%
Weighted average expected option life5.5 years
Average risk free interest rate4.6%
Average dividend yield-
Discount for post-vesting restrictionsN/A
Member Interests

On August 15, 2007 certain members of our management were granted Class B member interests in a limited liability company (parent LLC) that is the ultimate parent of the Company, and which owns all of the common stock of the Parent. The parent LLC is a holding company with no operations or employees of its own. The parent LLC has two classes of membership interests, Class A and Class B. Our non-management equity investors, or their affiliates, and Company employees that made equity investments to partially fund the Merger are Class A members.  In addition, the former shareholders of VI Tech (see Note 4) are also Class A members.  Class B members consist of certain Company employees. Pursuant to the terms of the limited liability company operating agreement governing the parent LLC, the holders of Class B member interests are entitled to receive a percentage of all distributions, if any, made by the parent LLC after (x) the holders of the Class A member interests in the parent LLC have received a return of their invested capital, plus a 12% per annum internal rate of return (compounded annually) on their invested capital and (y) certain members of our management that received Class A interests for their capital contributions have received a special distribution in the aggregate amount of $3.2 million, together with a 12% per annum internal rate of return (compounded annually). The Class B member interests are non-transferable and vest ratably over five years, with any unvested interests reverting to the holders of Class A interests in the event they are forfeited or repurchased. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” and FSP FAS No. 123(R)-4, “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event”, the Class B members interests are equity classified awards and, therefore, the fair value of the Class B members’ interests at the grant date is being recorded as compensation expense over the respective five year vesting periods, which amounted to $2.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 and $1.7 million for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008. In addition, since the Class A employee members that made equity investments to partially fund the Merger paid less than fair value for their Class A member interests, as only they are entitled to the $3.2 million special distribution and there is no vesting associated with the special distribution, the present value of the discount from fair value of $1.4 million was recorded by the Company as compensation expense on August 15, 2007.  The accretion of $252,000 and $193,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, respectively, was recorded as interest expense.

Compensation expense attributable to share based compensation was $2.0 million ($1.2 million after tax) for the year ended June 30, 2009, $3.1 million ($2.0 million after tax) for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, $214,000 ($135,000 after tax) for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $4.1 million ($2.6 million after tax) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.

F-31

A summary of the changes to outstanding stock options from July 1, 2007 to August 15, 2007 is presented below:
     Weighted 
     Average 
     Exercise 
  Shares  Price 
  (In thousands)    
       
Outstanding at June 30, 2007  13,003  $12.37 
Granted  -   - 
Forfeited  (27)  19.30 
Expired  -   - 
Exercised  (51)  11.39 
Cancelled  (3,825)  18.74 
Paid out on Merger  (9,100)  9.68 
Outstanding at August 15, 2007  -     
As no stock options were granted since August 15, 2007, there are also no stock options outstanding at June 30, 2009.

Cash received from stock option exercises was $583,000 for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $14.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.  The tax benefit received from stock option exercises was $16.1 million for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, $41,000 for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $3.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.

13.           Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Net income (loss) $(76,688) $(105,425) $(16,916) $4,926 
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate                
swap contracts, net of tax provision                
(benefit) of $(6,849), $829, $0 and $3  (11,013)  1,411   -   5 
Valuation allowance against                
non-current marketable securities  (2,268)  -   -   - 
Minimum pension liability adjustment                
net of tax of $(363), $(4), $0 and $(160)  (493)  (6)  -   (267)
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (41,333)  (998)  (497)  15,168 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $(131,795) $(105,018) $(17,413) $19,832 

F-32
 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:

  Unrealized             
  Gain (Loss)  Valuation  Minimum       
  on Interest  Allowance Against  Pension  Foreign    
  Rate Swap  Non-Current  Liability  Currency    
  Contracts  Marketable  Adjustment  Translation  Total 
  (net of tax)  Securities  (net of tax)  Adjustment  (net of tax) 
  (In thousands) 
                
Balance, June 30, 2006 $(12) $-  $(4,180) $17,660  $13,468 
Annual change  5   -   (267)  15,168   14,906 
Adjustment related to                    
initial adoption of SFAS 158  -   -   (728)  -   (728)
Balance, June 30, 2007  (7)  -   (5,175)  32,828   27,646 
Predecessor period  -   -   -   (497)  (497)
Adjustments for the effect                    
of the Merger  7   -   5,175   (32,331)  (27,149)
   -   -   -   -   - 
Successor period  1,411   -   (6)  (998)  407 
Balance, June 30, 2008  1,411   -   (6)  (998)  407 
Annual change  (11,013)  (2,268)  (493)  (41,333)  (55,107)
Balance, June 30, 2009 $(9,602) $(2,268) $(499) $(42,331) $(54,700)

The foreign currency translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to indefinite investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.  The valuation allowance for non-current marketable securities is not adjusted for income taxes as it would create a capital loss carryforward upon realization for which we would record a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset.

14.Income Taxes

The amount of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes attributable to domestic and foreign operations are as follows:

  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Domestic $(110,168) $(134,861) $(10,199) $41,710 
                 
Foreign  18,148   (4,670)  (11,040)  (7,981)
  $(92,020) $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729 

F-33
The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:

  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Current:            
Federal $49  $2,024  $(12,245) $28,800 
State and local  217   -   -   2,973 
Foreign  3,998   (121)  130   346 
   4,264   1,903   (12,115)  32,119 
                 
Deferred:                
Federal  (18,986)  (40,355)  9,503   (4,356)
State and local  2,882   (1,783)  (1,256)  (48)
Foreign  (3,492)  1,308   (2,963)  (2,780)
   (19,596)  (40,830)  5,284   (7,184)
  $(15,332) $(38,927) $(6,831) $24,935 

The provision for income taxes varies from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes as a result of the following:
  
Fiscal Year
Ended
  
August 15, 2007
to
  July 1, 2007 to  
Fiscal Year
Ended
 
  June 30, 2009  June 30 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Tax at federal statutory rate $(32,207) $(48,836) $(7,434) $11,805 
                 
Non-deductible acquired in-process research                
and development charge  665   8,744   -   - 
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries  8,138   -   -   - 
Foreign tax rate differential  (1,547)   (334)   664   (504) 
Foreign tax credits  (6,766)  -   -   - 
Increase in valuation allowance  6,190   5,420   237   2,772 
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit  2,735   (1,783)  (1,256)  1,951 
Impairment of goodwill  11,088   -   -   - 
Domestic manufacturing credit  -   (210)  -   (550)
Non-deductible merger expenses  403   5,861   1,111   10,704 
Research and development credit and deduction  (3,182)  (2,148)  (53)  (721)
Settlement of and change in tax contingencies  734   (3,416)  -   1,000 
Other, net  (1,583)  (2,225)  (100)  (1,522)
  $(15,332) $(38,927) $(6,831) $24,935 
F-34
The tax effects of temporary differences which give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of:

  June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  Successor  Successor 
  (In thousands) 
       
Accounts receivable $203  $250 
Inventories  20,926   17,191 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  14,625   20,652 
Other long-term liabilities  12,660   3,440 
Capital loss carryforwards  -   11,145 
Tax loss carryforwards  15,656   10,396 
Tax credit carryforwards  7,590   - 
Gross deferred tax assets  71,660   63,074 
Less:  valuation allowance  (17,300)  (23,131)
Net deferred tax assets  54,360   39,943 
Property, plant and equipment  (8,235)  (8,249)
Non-distributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries  (8,138)  - 
Intangible assets  (145,871)  (164,112)
Gross deferred tax liabilities  (162,244)  (172,361)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $(107,884) $(132,418)

Deferred tax assets have resulted primarily from our future deductible temporary differences and net operating loss, tax credit and capital loss carryforwards.  In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets depends upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income to allow for the utilization of its deductible temporary differences and loss and credit carryforwards.  If such estimates and related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in our consolidated statements of operations.  Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets and the need for additional valuation allowances quarterly. At this time, based on current facts and circumstances, management believes that it is more likely than not that we will realize benefit for our gross deferred tax assets, except those deferred tax assets against which a valuation allowance has been recorded.

Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been provided on undistributed foreign earnings through June 30, 2008 since we expect that substantially all of these earnings will be permanently reinvested in foreign operations.  Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries.

Deferred U.S. income taxes have been provided on undistributed foreign earnings for the year ended June 30, 2009 since we expect that substantially all of these earnings will be distributed to the US. During the year ended June 30, 2009, we repatriated $6.8 million of foreign earnings to fund interest payments required by our credit agreements.  Such repatriations will continue for the foreseeable future.  As such, effective in fiscal 2009, we provide U.S. income taxes on foreign income in the year earned.

In the year ended June 30, 2009 we utilized capital loss carryforwards of $7.3 million and had capital loss carryforwards of $14.0 million that expired unused.

F-35
As of June 30, 2009, we have domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $17.5 million which expire in fiscal 2029 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $4.3 million in the U.K., $15.6 million in France and $7.3 million in China which have no expiration.  We have state net operating loss carryforwards that create an available net tax benefit of $2.1 million. We have provided a valuation allowance against all net operating loss carryforwards in France and China, $3.0 million net operating loss carryforwards in the U.K., $287,000 of state net tax benefits, $6.8 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards and certain other deferred tax assets that are not deemed realizable.

As of June 30, 2009, we have U.S. research and development tax credit carryforwards of $765,000 which have been claimed and expire in fiscal 2029 and U.S. foreign tax credits of $1.1 million which have been claimed and expire in fiscal 2019. The Company also has foreign tax credits of $5.6 million that relate to foreign source income upon which U.S. taxes have been provided, but are not yet subject to current U.S. income taxes.  We have provided a valuation allowance against all claimed and unclaimed foreign tax credits.

We made income tax payments of $3.6 million, $7.8 million, $191,000 and $28.8 million and received refunds of $2.3 million, $27.1 million, $0 and $284,000 during the year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.  As a result of the Merger and the payments to option holders, we had a taxable loss for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 of $78.9 million.  This net operating loss was carried back to fiscal years 2007 and 2006, resulting in a $27.1 million Federal tax refund, which we received in May 2008.

On July 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109.”  This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”  FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return.  FIN 48 provides that unrecognized tax benefits should be based on the facts, circumstances and information available at each balance sheet date and that subsequent changes in judgment should be based on new facts and circumstances and any resulting change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefit should be accounted for in the interim period in which the change occurs.  The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The aggregate amount of unrecognized tax benefits included in liabilities was as follows:

  Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
       
Balance at beginning of year $1,005  $4,421 
Gross increase related to tax positions taken prior to fiscal year  817   495 
Gross decrease related to tax positions taken prior to fiscal year  (83)  (58)
Reduction as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations  -   (3,853)
Balance at end of year $1,739  $1,005 

Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities recognized in accordance with the provisions of FIN 48 are included in income tax expense, consistent with our historical policy and amounted to $401,000, $124,000 and $0 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to July 14, 2007, respectively.  At June 30, 2009 and 2008 accrued interest on uncertain tax positions was $474,000 and $188,000, respectively, net of the Federal benefit.

F-36

In September 2007, we settled a New York State income tax audit for the fiscal years 2002 through 2004. The decrease in the liability of $58,000 in fiscal 2008 was for the reversal of a liability previously recognized.

In April 2009, we settled a New York State income tax audit for the fiscal years 2005 and 2006 with no payment of taxes. The decrease in liability of $83,000 in fiscal 2009 was for a reversal of a liability previously recognized.

Currently, we are being audited by the Internal Revenue Service for fiscal years 2006 and 2007 and the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007; and the state of Kansas for the fiscal years 2004 through 2007. Management does not believe that the resolution of the ongoing income tax examinations described above will have a material adverse impact on our financial position.  Changes in the liabilities for uncertain tax positions will be recognized in the interim period in which the positions are effectively settled or there is a change in factual circumstances. The statute of limitations for our fiscal year 2005 Federal and the majority of our State tax returns has expired.

We recorded increases of $0, $0, $12.5 million and $2.9 million to additional paid-in capital during the year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the year ended June 30, 2007, respectively, in connection with the excess of the realized tax benefit related to compensation deductions on the exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares over the deferred tax asset attributable to stock compensation costs for such awards.

15.     Employment Contracts

We have employment agreements with our officers and certain other key employees for varying periods through 2014 with annual remuneration ranging from $80,000 to $555,000, plus cost of living adjustments and, in some cases, additional compensation based upon earnings of the Company.  Future aggregate minimum payments under these contracts are $9.7 million.  Certain of the contracts provide for a three-year consulting period at the expiration of the employment term at two-thirds of salary.  In addition, certain of these officers have the option to terminate their employment agreements upon a change in control of the Company, as defined, and receive lump sum payments equal to the salary and bonus, if any, for the remainder of the term.

16.     Employee Benefit Plans

401(k) and Profit Sharing Plans

All employees of the Company and certain subsidiaries who are not members of a collective bargaining agreement are eligible to participate in a Company sponsored 401(k) plan. Each participant has the option to contribute a portion of his or her compensation and through June 30, 2009 (when the discretionary match was suspended), to receive a discretionary employer matching contribution.  Furthermore, employees of one subsidiary are eligible to participate in a qualified profit sharing plan and receive an allocation of a discretionary share of the subsidiary’s profits.  For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively, aggregate expenses related to these 401(k) and profit sharing plans were $5.3 million, $4.7 million, $413,000 and $4.7 million, respectively.

F-37

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Merger constituted a change in control of the Company that accelerated the vesting of benefits under our SERP in the event of termination of employment of its three remaining active participants on or prior to August 15, 2008.  Additionally, soon after the Merger, the SERP was amended to provide that no additional benefits are earned after August 31, 2007.  Accordingly, if a participant’s employment was terminated prior to August 15, 2008, the participant would have received a lump sum payment of the present value of the benefits at retirement age based on average pay through August 31, 2007.  The additional benefits payable under the SERP resulting from the change of control of $16.6 million was recorded as compensation expense (included in sale transaction expenses) in August 2007 (Successor period).

The Company entered into amended employment agreements with certain participants in the SERP which, among other terms, provided that if such participants remain employed beyond August 15, 2008, which they have, specified payments, approximating the benefits earned under the SERP, plus 6% interest per annum from August 15, 2007, would be payable to those participants in full satisfaction of the benefits payable under the SERP, payable the earlier of December 31, 2008 to January 5, 2009, or upon specified events, including an additional change of control of the Company or termination.  The aggregate liability to these participants under the SERP, including the related interest, was $19.9 million (of which $19.1 million was included in Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities at June 30, 2008) and was paid in December 2008 and January 2009.  In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, we paid $10.3 million of benefits to participants in the SERP.

As of June 30, 2009, the SERP is unfunded, however, there are funds (primarily the cash surrender value of life insurance policies that specify the SERP as the beneficiary) being held in a rabbi trust for the one remaining individual in the SERP, an officer who retired in 2005.  Those assets (which are included in other assets) totaled $8.6 million and $8.0 million at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are not considered in the fair value of plan assets.  An actuarially determined liability of $6.7 million for the one remaining SERP participant is recorded as of June 30, 2009, of which $628,000 and $6.1 million is included in Accrued Expenses and Defined Benefit Plan Obligations, respectively.  Payments to the retired officer of $628,000, $523,000, $105,000 and $674,000 were made in the fiscal year 2009, the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year 2007, respectively.  We are required to make payments of $628,000 in each fiscal year pursuant to the SERP to this retired officer through December 31, 2015 or upon death, whichever is later.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, we recorded $544,000 and $858,000, respectively, of interest expense incurred on the SERP liabilities and $444,000 and $343,000 of pension expense, included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations, for an increase in the SERP liability.

Effective June 30, 2007, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” which requires employers to recognize in their balance sheets the overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit postretirement plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation (the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement plans).  Employers must recognize the change in the funded status of the plan in the year in which the change occurs through accumulated other comprehensive income. SFAS No. 158 also requires plan assets and obligations to be measured as of the employer’s balance sheet date.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158, changes in the funded status of our plans were not immediately recognized, rather they were deferred and recognized ratably over future periods.  Upon adoption of SFAS No. 158, we recognized the amounts of prior changes in the funded status of our SERP through accumulated other comprehensive income.

F-38

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

  Year Ended June 30, 
  2007 
  (In thousands) 
    
Service cost $151 
Interest cost  1,051 
Expected return on plan assets  - 
Amortization of net transition (asset) obligation  38 
Recognized actuarial loss  537 
Net periodic benefit cost $1,777 

Additional Information

  Year Ended June 30, 
  2007 
  (In thousands) 
    
Increase (decrease) in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income $394 

Assumptions

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations

  SERP 
  Years Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007 
          
Discount rate  5.00%  5.00%  6.25%
Rate of compensation increase  *   *   3.00%
           Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost

  SERP 
  Years Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007 
          
Discount rate  5.00%  5.00%  6.25%
Expected long-term return on plan assets  N/A   N/A   N/A 
Rate of compensation increase  *   *   3.00%

*Not applicable as the one participant in the SERP whose liability is actuarially determined at June 30, 2009 and 2008 is an inactive retired employee.

Plan Assets

As of June 30, 2009 and 2008 the SERP is unfunded.

F-39
17.     Legal Matters

In March 2005, we sold the net assets of our shock and vibration control device manufacturing business (“VMC”).  Under the terms of the sale agreements, we retained certain liabilities relating to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the premises occupied by VMC as of the date of sale and recorded a liability for the estimated remediation costs.  The accrued environmental liability at June 30, 2009 is $1.3 million, of which $322,000 is expected to be paid within one year.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we became aware that certain RadHard bidirectional multipurpose transceivers sold by us since 1999 may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with the ITAR. Accordingly, we filed a Voluntary Disclosure with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State, describing the details of the possible inadvertent misclassification. Simultaneously, we filed a Commodity Jurisdiction request providing detailed information and data supporting our contention that the product is not subject to ITAR and requesting a determination that such product is not ITAR controlled. On November 15, 2007, we were informed that the U.S. Department of State had determined in response to our Commodity Jurisdiction request, that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with ITAR. We requested reconsideration of this determination. On February 7, 2008, we filed an addendum to the above referenced Voluntary Disclosure advising the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls that other products sold by us, similar in nature to the transceiver described above, may also be subject to the ITAR. The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls agreed to extend our time to file such addendum to the Voluntary Disclosure until a decision was rendered with respect to our request for reconsideration of the determination in connection with the above-referenced Commodity Jurisdiction request. On August 5, 2008, we received a letter from the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (“DTCC”) requesting that we provide documentation and/or information relating to our compliance initiatives after November 15, 2007 as well as the results of any product reviews conducted by us, and indicating that a civil penalty against us could be warranted in connection with this matter following the review of such materials. We have provided all of the materials and documentation requested by the DTCC.  Our request for reconsideration was denied by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls on August 19, 2008 which determined that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of State in accordance with ITAR. Accordingly, on September 18, 2008, we filed an addendum to our Voluntary Disclosure identifying other products that may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with the ITAR but were inadvertently misclassified.  At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us or the materiality of any outcome.

The Company is involved in various other ITAR related matters, including some recently identified with the prior practices of a recently acquired business, which have been disclosed, or may warrant disclosure, with the U.S. Department of State.  Although we are in the process of addressing these matters, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to adequately correct all possible ITAR violations. At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us related to these other ITAR matters, or the materiality of any outcome.

An amended class action complaint was filed against us and the Predecessor Entity’s board of directors on June 20, 2007 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County. The complaint alleges that the board breached its fiduciary duties to our stockholders (i) by issuing a preliminary proxy statement on June 5, 2007 that was issued in connection with seeking stockholder approval of the Merger and (ii) in approving certain amendments, that were allegedly beyond the scope of our corporate powers, to our SERP and the employment agreements of defendants Harvey R. Blau, our then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Leonard Borow, our then President and Chief Operating Officer and currently, the Successor Entity’s President and Chief Executive Officer. We have reached a settlement with the plaintiffs and have accrued an insignificant liability for the settlement.

F-40
We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

18.      Other Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

Several of our operating facilities and certain machinery and equipment are leased under agreements expiring through 2020.  The leases for machinery and equipment generally contain purchase options at the then fair value of the related leased assets at the end of their lease term.

Future minimum payments under operating leases as of June 30, 2009 are as follows for the fiscal years:
  (In thousands) 
2010 $6,864 
2011  5,390 
2012  3,724 
2013  2,205 
2014  1,196 
Thereafter  1,114 
Future minimum lease payments $20,493 

Rental expense was $7.4 million, $7.0 million, $1.1 million, and $9.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.  Sub-lease rental income was $84,000, $486,000, $145,000, and $1.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

19.      Business Segments

Our business segments and major products included in each segment, are as follows:

Microelectronic Solutions (“AMS”)

·Microelectronic Components, Sub-assemblies and Modules
·Integrated Circuits
·Motion Control Systems

Test Solutions (“ATS”)

·Instrument Products and Test Systems

We are a manufacturer of advanced technology systems and components for commercial industry, government and defense contractors. Approximately 37% of our sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, 29% for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, 21% for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and 30% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 were to agencies of the United States government or to prime defense contractors or subcontractors of the United States government. No customer constituted more than 10% of sales during any of the periods presented. Inter-segment sales were not material and have been eliminated from the tables below.

F-41
The majority of our operations are located in the United States; however, we also have operations in Europe and Asia, with our most significant operations in the U.K. Net sales from facilities located in the U.K. were approximately $129.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, $167.7 million for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, $11.7 million for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $166.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. Total assets of the United Kingdom operations were $188.2 million as of June 30, 2009 and $237.5 million as of June 30, 2008.

Net sales, based on the customers’ locations, attributed to the United States and other regions are as follows:

  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
United States of America $350,844  $329,226  $21,183  $346,235 
Europe and Middle East  140,458   141,422   10,357   155,905 
Asia and Australia  98,621   123,887   6,242   84,779 
Other regions  9,413   10,456   439   6,227 
  $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 
F-42
Selected financial data by segment is as follows:

  Fiscal Year  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Fiscal Year 
  Ended June 30,  to June 30,  to August 14,  Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  2007 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Net sales:            
Microelectronic solutions ("AMS") $287,517  $283,695  $19,017  $266,515 
Test solutions ("ATS")  311,819   321,296   19,204   326,631 
Net sales $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 
                 
Segment adjusted operating income:                
- AMS $63,368  $74,802  $24  $63,908 
- ATS  50,141   54,216   (7,582)  38,582 
General corporate expense  (11,377)  (8,176)  (2,347)  (17,727)
Adjusted operating income (loss)  102,132   120,842   (9,905)  84,763 
                 
Amortization of acquired intangibles                
- AMS  (36,635)  (44,085)  (279)  (1,911)
- ATS  (26,327)  (28,991)  (1,413)  (11,095)
Share based compensation                
- AMS  -   -   (83)  (965)
- ATS  -   -   95   (958)
- Corporate  (1,955)  (3,123)  (226)  (2,161)
Restructuring charges                
- AMS  -   (414)  -   - 
- ATS  (4,102)  (6,581)  (3,778)  (2,840)
One-time lease termination costs                
- ATS  -   -   (576)  - 
Merger related expenses - Corporate  (4,283)  (4,092)  (1,319)  - 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles                
- AMS  (41,225)  -   -   - 
- ATS  -   -   -     
Acquired in-process R&D costs              - 
- AMS  (1,665)  (16,335)  -   - 
- ATS  -   (8,640)  -   - 
Current period impact of acquisition related adjustments:                
Inventory - AMS  -   (23,817)  (57)  - 
Inventory - ATS  (668)  (15,151)  -   - 
Depreciation - AMS  (1,143)  (1,025)  -   - 
Depreciation - ATS  (2,702)  (2,882)  -   - 
Depreciation - Corporate  (220)  (193)  -   - 
Deferred revenue - ATS  (416)  (2,510)  -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  -   (32,493)  (3,717)  (30,584)
Operating income (loss) (GAAP)  (19,209)  (69,490)  (21,258)  34,249 
                 
Interest expense  (83,823)  (74,658)  (275)  (672)
Other income (expense), net  11,012   4,617   294   152 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $(92,020) $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729 
F-43
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Total assets:      
- AMS $689,487  $754,451 
- ATS  566,120   605,120 
- Corporate  105,990   119,428 
- Assets of discontinued operations  -   - 
Total assets: $1,361,597  $1,478,999 
  Fiscal Year  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Fiscal Year 
  Ended June 30,  to June 30,  to August 14,  Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  2007 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Capital expenditures:            
- AMS $6,792  $7,087  $338  $9,942 
- ATS  11,914   5,950   501   7,155 
- Corporate  11   142   249   1,330 
Total capital expenditures $18,717  $13,179  $1,088  $18,427 
                 
Depreciation and amortization expense:                
- AMS  45,471   51,419   1,137   8,675 
- ATS  38,257   41,060   2,509   21,258 
- Corporate  698   553   16   209 
Total depreciation and amortization expense $84,426  $93,032  $3,662  $30,142 
Management evaluates the operating results of the two segments based upon pre-tax operating income, before costs related to restructuring, lease termination charges, amortization of acquired intangibles, share-based compensation, acquired in-process research and development costs, Company Sale Transaction expenses, merger related expenses and the impact of any acquisition related adjustments.

20.        Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Financial Information

The following supplemental condensed consolidating financial information sets forth, on an unconsolidated basis, the balance sheets at June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 and the statements of operations and cash flows for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 for Aeroflex Incorporated (the “Parent Company”), the Guarantor Subsidiaries and, on a combined basis, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.  The supplemental condensed consolidating financial information reflects for all fiscal periods presented, the investments of the Parent Company in the Guarantor Subsidiaries as well as the investments of the Parent Company and the Guarantor Subsidiaries in the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, in all cases using the equity method.  The Parent Company’s purchase price allocation adjustments, including applicable intangible assets, arising from business acquisitions have been pushed down to the applicable subsidiary columns (see Notes 3 and 4).

F-44

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $431,581  $175,317  $(7,562) $599,336 
Cost of sales  -   227,200   94,195   (7,164)  314,231 
Gross profit  -   204,381   81,122   (398)  285,105 
Selling, general and administrative costs  17,835   73,384   37,137   -   128,356 
Research and development costs  -   46,272   23,834   -   70,106 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   53,862   9,100   -   62,962 
Acquired in-process R&D costs  -   -   1,665   -   1,665 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  -   41,225   -   -   41,225 
Operating income (loss)  (17,835)  (10,362)  9,386   (398)  (19,209)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (83,724)  (88)  (11)  -   (83,823)
Other income (expense), net  (319)  907   10,424   -   11,012 
Intercompany charges  80,026   (77,524)  (2,502)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  (21,852)  (87,067)  17,297   (398)  (92,020)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (1,570)  (13,307)  (455)�� -   (15,332)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  (20,282)  (73,760)  17,752   (398)  (76,688)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (56,406)  18,605   -   37,801   - 
Net income (loss) $(76,688) $(55,155) $17,752  $37,403  $(76,688)
F-45


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $429,372  $180,832  $(5,213) $604,991 
Cost of sales  -   253,291   104,857   (5,195)  352,953 
Gross profit  -   176,081   75,975   (18)  252,038 
Selling, general and administrative costs  15,584   66,265   39,237   -   121,086 
Research and development costs  -   40,097   29,801   -   69,898 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   63,477   9,599   -   73,076 
Acquired in-process R&D costs  -   21,820   3,155   -   24,975 
Company sale transaction expenses  32,493   -   -   -   32,493 
Operating income (loss)  (48,077)  (15,578)  (5,817)  (18)  (69,490)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (74,563)  (95)  -   -   (74,658)
Other income (expense), net  1,943   147   2,527   -   4,617 
Intercompany charges  81,994   (80,482)  (1,512)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (38,703)  (96,008)  (4,802)  (18)  (139,531)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (11,525)  (28,589)  1,187   -   (38,927)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (27,178)  (67,419)  (5,989)  (18)  (100,604)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (4,821)  -   -   (4,821)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (78,247)  (5,712)  -   83,959   - 
Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(77,952) $(5,989) $83,941  $(105,425)
F-46

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $25,858  $12,809  $(446) $38,221 
Cost of sales  -   15,066   8,074   (279)  22,861 
Gross profit  -   10,792   4,735   (167)  15,360 
Selling, general and administrative costs  3,892   7,571   7,568   -   19,031 
Research and development costs  -   5,526   6,652   -   12,178 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   601   1,091   -   1,692 
Company sale transaction expenses  3,717   -   -   -   3,717 
Operating income (loss)  (7,609)  (2,906)  (10,576)  (167)  (21,258)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (261)  (14)  -   -   (275)
Other income (expense), net  157   27   110   -   294 
Intercompany charges  5,544   (5,109)  (435)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (2,169)  (8,002)  (10,901)  (167)  (21,239)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (853)  (3,145)  (2,833)  -   (6,831)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (1,316)  (4,857)  (8,068)  (167)  (14,408)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (2,508)  -   -   (2,508)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (15,600)  (7,814)  -   23,414   - 
Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)
F-47

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended June 30, 2007
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $422,347  $177,586  $(6,787) $593,146 
Cost of sales  -   217,025   98,927   (6,983)  308,969 
Gross profit  -   205,322   78,659   196   284,177 
Selling, general and administrative costs  19,888   71,125   38,608   -   129,621 
Research and development costs  -   42,241   34,476   -   76,717 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   4,498   8,508   -   13,006 
Company sale transaction expenses  30,584   -   -   -   30,584 
Operating income (loss)  (50,472)  87,458   (2,933)  196   34,249 
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (534)  (127)  (11)  -   (672)
Other income (expense), net  1,479   205   (1,532)  -   152 
Intercompany charges  45,158   (41,672)  (3,486)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (4,369)  45,864   (7,962)  196   33,729 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (2,882)  30,251   (2,434)  -   24,935 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (1,487)  15,613   (5,528)  196   8,794 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (3,868)  -   -   (3,868)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  6,413   (4,629)  -   (1,784)  - 
Net income (loss) $4,926  $7,116  $(5,528) $(1,588) $4,926 
F-48

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet 
As of June 30, 2009 
(In thousands) 
                
     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $31,221  $(15) $26,542  $-  $57,748 
Accounts receivable, net  -   86,530   43,899   -   130,429 
Inventories  -   103,674   32,827   (898)  135,603 
Deferred income taxes  3,452   25,681   6,031   -   35,164 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,623   2,542   4,773   -   9,938 
Total current assets  37,296   218,412   114,072   (898)  368,882 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  12,720   67,624   20,563   -   100,907 
Non-current marketable securities  17,677   -   -   -   17,677 
Deferred financing costs  25,754   -   -   -   25,754 
Other assets  12,551   2,243   631   -   15,425 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   253,225   39,328   -   292,553 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives, net  -   85,404   26,862   -   112,266 
Goodwill  (10)  388,913   39,230   -   428,133 
Total assets $105,988  $1,015,821  $240,686  $(898) $1,361,597 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $5,250  $340  $-  $-  $5,590 
Accounts payable  285   20,553   15,736   -   36,574 
Advanced payments by customers and deferred revenue  -   17,433   15,985   -   33,418 
Income taxes payable  587   -   4,493   -   5,080 
Accrued payroll expenses  1,600   15,148   2,128   -   18,876 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  25,418   11,079   11,441   -   47,938 
Total current liabilities  33,140   64,553   49,783   -   147,476 
                     
Long-term debt  883,013   745   -   -   883,758 
Deferred income taxes  (11,453)  138,725   15,776   -   143,048 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,079   -   -   -   6,079 
Other long-term liabilities  16,825   1,271   3,380   -   21,476 
Intercompany investment  (268,635)  41,022   227,613   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (880,752)  902,126   (20,891)  (483)  - 
Total liabilities  (221,783)  1,148,442   275,661   (483)  1,201,837 
                     
Stockholder's equity:  327,771   (132,621)  (34,975)  (415)  159,760 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $105,988  $1,015,821  $240,686  $(898) $1,361,597 
F-49

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $39,285  $(2,379) $17,243  $-  $54,149 
Accounts receivable, net  -   90,343   57,640   -   147,983 
Inventories  -   91,856   43,537   (502)  134,891 
Deferred income taxes  (2,352)  23,539   5,852   -   27,039 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,464   2,616   7,104   -   12,184 
Total current assets  39,397   205,975   131,376   (502)  376,246 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  13,406   63,964   27,279   -   104,649 
Non-current marketable securities  19,960   -   -   -   19,960 
Deferred financing costs  30,185   -   -   -   30,185 
Other assets  16,480   2,474   (394)  -   18,560 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   297,408   47,458   -   344,866 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives  -   90,229   33,149   -   123,378 
Goodwill  -   435,570   25,101   484   461,155 
Total assets $119,428  $1,095,620  $263,969  $(18) $1,478,999 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $5,250  $324  $-  $-  $5,574 
Accounts payable  554   19,882   18,946   -   39,382 
Deferred revenue, including advance payments  -   8,621   18,523   -   27,144 
Income taxes payable  409   -   1,527   -   1,936 
Accrued payroll expense  2,106   18,200   4,219   -   24,525 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  31,205   12,272   13,353   -   56,830 
Total current liabilities  39,524   59,299   56,568   -   155,391 
                     
Long-term debt  872,152   1,085   -   -   873,237 
Deferred income taxes  (12,254)  150,400   21,311   -   159,457 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,263   -   -   -   6,263 
Other long-term liabilities  1,368   487   6,148   -   8,003 
Intercompany investment  (248,051)  2,944   245,107   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (895,004)  953,623   (58,619)  -   - 
Total liabilities  (236,002)  1,167,838   270,515   -   1,202,351 
                     
Stockholder's equity  355,430   (72,218)  (6,546)  (18)  276,648 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $119,428  $1,095,620  $263,969  $(18) $1,478,999 

F-50

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiary  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $(76,688) $(55,155) $17,752  $37,403  $(76,688)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non-cash items, included in net income (loss)  93,160   70,023   5,365   (37,403)  131,145 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  16,472   14,868   23,117   -   54,457 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Payment for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired
  (18,935) $-  $-  $-  $(18,935)
Capital expenditures  (11)  (13,377)  (5,329)  -   (18,717)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   1,197   242   -   1,439 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (18,946) $(12,180) $(5,087) $-  $(36,213)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Debt repayments  (5,250)  (324)  -   -   (5,574)
Debt financing costs  (340)  -   -   -   (340)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  (5,590)  (324)  -   -   (5,914)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   (8,731)  -   (8,731)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (8,064)  2,364   9,299   -   3,599 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  39,285   (2,379)  17,243   -   54,149 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $31,221  $(15) $26,542  $-  $57,748 
F-51

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $(105,425) $(77,952) $(5,989) $83,941  $(105,425)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   4,821   -   -   4,821 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (105,425)  (73,131)  (5,989)  83,941   (100,604)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  95,482   88,036   15,223   (83,941)  114,800 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  (9,943)  14,905   9,234   -   14,196 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (5,286)  -   -   (5,286)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (9,943)  9,619   9,234   -   8,910 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Acquisition of predecessor entity, net of cash acquired  (1,128,915)  (2,593)  13,215   -   (1,118,293)
Payment for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired  (11,145)  -   -   -   (11,145)
Capital expenditures  (142)  (9,386)  (3,651)  -   (13,179)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   52   177   -   229 
Purchase of marketable securities  (631,805)  -   -   -   (631,805)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  611,853   -   -   -   611,853 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (1,160,154)  (11,927)  9,741   -   (1,162,340)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (36)  -   -   (36)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (1,160,154)  (11,963)  9,741   -   (1,162,376)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  378,350   -   -   -   378,350 
Borrowings under debt agreements  870,000   -   -   -   870,000 
Debt repayments  (5,746)  (35)  (302)  -   (6,083)
Debt financing costs  (33,222)  -   -   -   (33,222)
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (14,142)  -   -   -   (14,142)
Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  14,142   -   -   -   14,142 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  1,209,382   (35)  (302)  -   1,209,045 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   (1,430)  -   (1,430)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  39,285   (2,379)  17,243   -   54,149 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  -   -   -   -   - 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $39,285  $(2,379) $17,243  $-  $54,149 
F-52

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   2,508   -   -   2,508 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (16,916)  (12,671)  (8,068)  23,247   (14,408)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  23,110   12,708   13,591   (23,247)  26,162 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  6,194   37   5,523   -   11,754 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (461)  -   -   (461)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  6,194   (424)  5,523   -   11,293 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Capital expenditures  (249)  (587)  (252)  -   (1,088)
Purchase of marketable securities  (53,828)  -   -   -   (53,828)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  63,328   -   -   -   63,328 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  9,251   (587)  (252)  -   8,412 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (6)  -   -   (6)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  9,251   (593)  (252)  -   8,406 
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Debt repayments  (26)  (3)  -   -   (29)
Debt financing costs  (477)  -   -   -   (477)
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  12,542   -   -   -   12,542 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  583   -   -   -   583 
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (56)  -   -   -   (56)
Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  56   -   -   -   56 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  12,622   (3)  -   -   12,619 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   178   -   178 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  28,067   (1,020)  5,449   -   32,496 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  6,807   (1,573)  7,766   -   13,000 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $34,874  $(2,593) $13,215  $-  $45,496 
 
 
F-53
 

Aeroflex Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2007
(In thousands)

  Three Months Ended  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007 
   September 30, 2008  to September 30, 2007  to August 14, 2007 
   Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
          
Net sales $140,845  $102,015  $38,221 
Cost of sales  73,486   64,760   22,861 
Gross profit  67,359   37,255   15,360 
             
             
Selling, general and administrative costs  31,484   18,984   19,031 
Research and development costs  17,029   10,480   12,178 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  17,968   10,470   1,692 
Acquired in-process research and development costs  -   24,340   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  -   30,295   3,717 
   66,481   94,569   36,618 
Operating income (loss)  878   (57,314)  (21,258)
             
Other income (expense)            
Interest expense  (21,215)  (11,136)  (275)
Other income (expense), net  3,086   (255)  294 
Total other income (expense)  (18,129)  (11,391)  19 
             
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (17,251)  (68,705)  (21,239)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (10,354)  (19,169)  (6,831)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (6,897)  (49,536)  (14,408)
             
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of            
tax provision (benefit)  -   (962)  (2,508)
             
Net income (loss) $(6,897) $(50,498) $(16,916)
        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $4,926  $7,116  $(5,528) $(1,588) $4,926 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   3,868   -   -   3,868 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  4,926   10,984   (5,528)  (1,588)  8,794 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  2,779   726   8,592   1,588   13,685 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  7,705   11,710   3,064   -   22,479 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (1,677)  -   -   (1,677)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  7,705   10,033   3,064   -   20,802 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Payment for purchase of business, net of cash acquired  (10,663)  -   -   -   (10,663)
Contingent payment for purchase of business  (9,247)  -   -   -   (9,247)
Capital expenditures  (1,331)  (12,766)  (4,330)  -   (18,427)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   382   98   -   480 
Purchase of marketable securities  (589,577)  -   -   -   (589,577)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  608,409   -   -   -   608,409 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (2,409)  (12,384)  (4,232)  -   (19,025)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (88)  -   -   (88)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (2,409)  (12,472)  (4,232)  -   (19,113)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock  (17,234)  -   -   -   (17,234)
Debt repayments  (315)  (11)  (285)  -   (611)
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  2,870   -   -   -   2,870 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  14,182   -   -   -   14,182 
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (3,383)  -   -   -   (3,383)
Withholding taxes collected for stock options exercises  3,383   -   -   -   3,383 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  (497)  (11)  (285)  -   (793)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   1,717   -   1,717 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  4,799   (2,450)  264   -   2,613 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  2,008   877   7,502   -   10,387 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $6,807  $(1,573) $7,766  $-  $13,000 
 
 
F-54
 

Aeroflex Incorporated
and Subsidiaries
21.Subsequent Events
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements
In accordance with the Company’s adoption of Cash FlowsSFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” the Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2009 up through September 1, 2009, the date the Company issued these consolidated financial statements.  Based on that evaluation, we have determined no material events or transactions occurred after June 30, 2009 up through September 1, 2009 that would affect the June 30, 2009 consolidated financial statements.

22. 
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):

(In thousands)

  Quarter  Year Ended 
2009 First  Second  Third  Fourth  June 30, 
                
Net sales $140,845  $156,815  $139,439  $162,237  $599,336 
Gross profit  67,359   73,159   66,605   77,982   285,105 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (6,897)  (4,107)  (13,734)  (51,950)  (76,688)

  Three Months Ended  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007 
   September 30,  to September 30,  to August 14, 
   2008  2007  2007 
   Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
Cash flows from operating activities:         
Net income (loss) $(6,897) $(50,498) $(16,916)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   962   2,508 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (6,897)  (49,536)  (14,408)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  23,497   13,302   3,662 
Acquired in-process research and development costs  -   24,340   - 
Acquisition related adjustment to cost of sales  -   12,400   - 
Acquisition related adjustment to sales  97   676   - 
Deferred income taxes  (12,444)  11,142   5,284 
Non - cash share based compensation  489   1,657   214 
Amortization of deferred financing costs  1,189   267   217 
Paid in kind interest  3,888   -   - 
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements      -   -   (12,542)
Other, net  508   72   (24)
Change in operating assets and liabilities,            
net of effects from purchases of businesses:            
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable  32,411   (36,848)  47,889 
Decrease (increase) in inventories  (7,024)  7,579   (12,885)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses            
and other assets  (9)  31,319   (26,899)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities  (7,195)  (45,433)  21,246 
             
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  28,510   (29,063)  11,754 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (1,325)  (461)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  28,510   (30,388)  11,293 
             
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Acquisition of Predecessor Entity, net of cash acquired  -   (1,118,293)  - 
Capital expenditures  (3,343)  (1,422)  (1,088)
Purchase of marketable securities  -   (317,104)  (53,828)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  -   267,426   63,328 
Other  2   15   - 
             
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities by continuing operations      (3,341)  (1,169,378)  8,412 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (2)  (6)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (3,341)  (1,169,380)  8,406 
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  -   378,350   - 
Borrowings under debt agreements  -   870,000   - 
Debt repayments  (1,317)  (1,814)  (29)
Debt financing costs  (439)  (27,145)  (477)
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements      -   -   12,542 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  -   -   583 
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  -   (14,142)  (56)
Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  -   14,142   56 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (1,756)  1,219,391   12,619 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents    (4,496)  (564)  178 
             
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  18,917   19,059   32,496 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  54,149   -   13,000 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $73,066  $19,059  $45,496 
  Quarter  Year Ended 
2008 First  Second  Third  Fourth  June 30, 
                
Net sales $140,236  $160,757  $157,304  $184,915  $643,212 
Gross profit  52,615   54,633   69,236   90,914   267,398 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (63,944)  (29,068)  (15,437)  (6,563)  (115,012)

Note:  We are not presenting per share data here as we currently only have one shareholder.
 
F-55
 
AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.           Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements of Aeroflex Incorporated and Subsidiaries (the “Company”,”we”, or “our’’) presented herein are unaudited.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for all periods presented have been made.  Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been omitted.  These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s June 30, 2008 audited financial statements and notes thereto.

Results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for future interim periods or for the full fiscal year ending June 30, 2009.

The Company and its Sale
We
Aeroflex Incorporated and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, or “our”) design, engineer and manufacture microelectronics and test solution and measurement equipment that are sold primarily to the broadband communications, aerospace and defense markets. Our fiscal year ends on June 30.

On August 15, 2007, the Company was sold toacquired by affiliates of or funds managed by The Veritas Capital Fund Ill, L.P. (“Veritas”), Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc. (“Golden Gate”) and GS Direct, L.L.C. (“GS Direct”) and certain members of management (“the Merger”) (see Note 3).

Presentation and Use of Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. We consolidate our subsidiaries, all of which, except for Test Evolution Corporation (see Note 4), are wholly owned. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The condensed consolidated financial statements presented as of SeptemberJune 30, 2009 and 2008, and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20082009 and the three months ended September 30, 2008 andfor the period from August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 represent the Company subsequent to its acquisition (the “Successor” or “Successor Entity”), whereas the consolidated financial statements as of and for the period from July 1, 2007periods prior to August 14,15, 2007 represent the Company prior to the Merger (the “Predecessor” or “Predecessor Entity”). The purchase method of accounting was applied effective August 15, 2007 in connection with the Merger. Therefore, our consolidated financial statements for periods before August 15, 2007 are presented on a different basis than those for the periods after August 14, 2007 and, as such, are not comparable.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires that management of the Company make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among the more significant estimates included in our consolidated financial statements are revenue and cost recognition under long-term contracts; the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories, investments and deferred tax assets; the depreciable lives of fixed assets and useful lives of amortizable intangible assets; the valuation of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations; the recoverability of long-lived amortizable intangible assets, tradenames and goodwill, as well as net assets of discontinued operations;goodwill; share-based compensation; restructuring charges; asset retirement obligationsobligations; fair value measurement of financial assets and liabilities and certain accrued expenses and contingencies.

F-56

We are subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic, environmental and political factors and changes in the business climate; therefore, actual results may differ from those estimates. When no estimate in a given range is deemed to be better than any other when estimating contingent liabilities, the low end of the range is accrued. TheAccordingly, the accounting estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made when circumstances warrant them. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations. Ifoperations; if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-7
Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments having maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition are considered to be cash equivalents.

Marketable Securities
Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses net of taxes, reported as a separate component of stockholder’s equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in market value judged to be other than temporary, of which there were none, for the three years ended June 30, 2009, are included in other income.income (expense). Interest income isand dividends are also included in other income.

At SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, our marketable securities consisted primarily of $19.9$17.7 million of auction rate securities, at par value.which is net of a $2.3 million valuation allowance. Auction rate securities represent long-term (generally maturities of ten years to thirty-five years from the date of issuance) variable rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates that are reset through an auction process, which occurs every seven to thirty-five days, and are classified as available for sale securities. All but one (with the one security having a carrying value of $1.9$1.7 million and a AAan A rating) of our auction rate securities retain a triple-A rating by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. In addition, certain of our auction rate securities are backed by student loans whose principal and interest are federally guaranteed by the Family Federal Education Loan Program.  To date, weWe have collected all interest payments on all of our auction rate securities when due and since early February 2008 (when auctions began to fail) have redeemed $26.5$27.5 million of auction rate securities at par.par, including $1.0 million redeemed at par in July 2009.

At SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, the par value of our auction rate securities was $19.9 million; however we concludedhave estimated that the fair value of our auction rate securities as of that date was $18.7$17.7 million.  Since many auctions are failing and given that there is currently no active secondary market for our investment in auction rate securities, the determination of fair value was based on the following factors:

·continuing illiquidity;
·lack of action by the issuers to establish different forms of financing to replace or redeem these securities; and
·the credit quality of the underlying securities.

IfAs fair values were to continuehave continued to be below cost, for a prolonged period of time, we would considerhave considered various factors in determining whether a credit loss exists and whether to recognize an other than temporary impairment charge, including the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below the cost basis, the timely receipt of all interest payments, the rating of the security, the relatively low volatility of the security’s fair value, the current financial condition of the issuer and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

Auction rate securities are classified as non-current assets in the accompanying September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008 consolidated balance sheets.

Inventories

Inventories, including amounts related to long-term contracts accounted for under percentage-of-completion accounting, are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

F-8
Financial Instruments and Derivatives

Foreign currency contracts are used in certain circumstances to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates. We enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges. Thus the change in fair value is included in income as it occurs, within other income (expense). As of September 30, 2008, we had $2.4 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through December 2008. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of the Company, but are used in the calculationconsolidated statement of cash settlements under the contracts. The fair value of these contracts at September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008 was insignificant.operations.

F-57

Our interest rate swap derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges. As such, they are recorded on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities at their fair value, with changes in the fair value of such derivatives, net of taxes, recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. The fair value of the interest rate swap derivatives as of September 30, 2008 was a liability of $665,000 ($419,000, net of taxes) and as of June 30, 2008 was an asset of $2.2 million ($1.4 million, net of taxes).

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectibilitycollectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

For arrangements other than certain long-term contracts, revenue (including shipping and handling fees) is recognized when products are shipped and title has passed to the customer. If title does not pass until the product reaches the customer’s delivery site, recognition of the revenue is deferred until that time. Certain of our sales are to distributors which have a right to return some portion of product within up to eighteen months of sale. We recognize revenue on these sales at the time of shipment to the distributor, as the returns under these arrangements have been insignificant and can be reasonably estimated. A provision for such estimated returns is recorded at the time sales are recognized.

Long-term contracts are accounted for in accordance with SOP 81-1 “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.”  We determine estimated contract profit rates and use the percentage-of-completion method to recognize revenues and associated costs as work progresses on certain long-term contracts. We measure the extent of progress toward completion generally based upon one of the following methods (based upon an assessment of which method most closely aligns to the underlying earnings process),: (i) the units-of-delivery method, (ii) the cost-to-cost method, using the ratio of contract costs incurred as a percentage of total estimated costs at contract completion (based upon engineering and production estimates), or (iii) the achievement of contractual milestones. Provisions for anticipated losses or revisions in estimated profits on contracts-in-process are recorded in the period in which such anticipated losses or revisions become evident.

Revenue from sales of products where software is other than incidental to their performance, including related software support and maintenance contracts is recognized in accordance with SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” Accordingly, revenue for software is recognized when the software is delivered, if all of the above criteria for revenue recognition are met.

When a customer purchases software together with post contract support, we allocate a portion of the fee to the post contract support for its fair value based on the contractual renewal rate or the amount the support is sold for on a standalone basis. Post contract support fees are deferred in Advance Payments by Customers and Deferred Revenue in the consolidated balance sheets, and recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the related contract.

Acquisition Accounting

We use the purchase method to account for business combinations, whereby the total cost of an acquisition is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price is dependent upon certain valuations and other studies, which contain estimates and assumptions.

F-9
Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the cost of purchased businesses over the fair value of their underlying net assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of tradenames. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized. Definite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of customer related intangibles and developed technology, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging up to 11 years.  
We testassess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles at least annually for impairment and wheneveras of June 30, or more frequently if certain events or circumstances indicate an impairment mightmay have occurred.  We evaluate the recoverability oftest goodwill using a two-stepfor impairment test approach at the reporting unit level. In the first step,level, which is used toone level below our operating segments.  We identify potential impairments,our reporting units by assessing whether the overall fair valuecomponents of our operating segments constitute businesses for thewhich discrete financial information is available and management of each reporting unit regularly reviews the operating results of those components.  Impairment testing is compared to its carrying amount including goodwill. Ifperformed in two steps: (i) we determine if there is an impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, and (ii) if there is less thanan impairment, we measure the carrying amount a second step is performed which comparesof impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the carrying amount(the excess of the goodwill. The implied fair value for the goodwill is determined based on the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit andover the fair value of its net identifiable assets.assets) with the carrying amount of that goodwill.  The impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets encompasses calculating a fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and comparing the fair value to its carrying value.  If the impliedcarrying value exceeds the fair value, impairment is recorded.
Testing goodwill for impairment requires us to estimate fair values of reporting units using significant estimates and assumptions.  The assumptions made will impact the outcome and ultimate results of the testing.  We use industry accepted valuation models and set criteria that are reviewed and approved by various levels of management and, in certain instances, we engage third-party valuation specialists to assist us in estimating fair values.  To determine fair value of the goodwill is less than its carrying amount,reporting unit, we generally use an income approach.  We use a market approach to assess the difference is recognizedreasonableness of the results of the income approach.
Under the income approach, we determine fair value using a discounted cash flow method, estimating future cash flows of each reporting unit, as well as terminal value, and discounting such cash flows at a rate of return that reflects the relative risk of the cash flows.
The key estimates and factors used in the income approach include, but are not limited to, revenue growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts, terminal value and the weighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows. The fiscal 2009 compound annual growth rate of sales for the first 6 years of our projections ranged between 4% and 24%.  The fiscal 2008 compound annual growth rate of sales for the first 6 years of our projections ranged between 1% and 15%. The terminal growth rates were projected at 5% after between 7 to 10 years in fiscal 2009 as compared with 5% after between 9 to 11 years in fiscal 2008, which reflects our estimate of long term market and gross domestic product growth.  The weighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows ranged from 14% to 19% in fiscal 2009 as compared with 13% to 16% in fiscal 2008.  Future changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the results of our reviews for impairment of goodwill.  Changes in the valuation assumptions from those used in the prior year primarily reflect the impact of the current economic environment on the reporting units and their projected future results of operations.
To determine fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, we use an impairment.income approach, the relief-from-royalty method.  This method assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to obtain the rights to use the comparable asset.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets’ fair values require significant judgments in determining both the assets’ estimated cash flows as well as the appropriate discount and royalty rates applied to those cash flows to determine fair value.  Changes in such estimates or the application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results.

F-58F-10

Our amortizable intangibleWe review other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  When such events or changes in circumstances occur, a recoverability test is performed comparing projected undiscounted cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of an asset or asset group to its carrying value.  If the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment would be recorded for the excess of the carrying value over the fair value, which are comprised primarily of developed technology and customer related intangibles, are subject to amortization over periods ranging up to 11 years, on a straight-line basis. is determined by discounting future cash flows.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, principally on a straight-line basis. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease, including anticipated renewals, or the estimated life of the asset, whichever is shorter.

We periodically review our depreciable and amortizable long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Research and Development Costs

We charge all research and development costs to expense as incurred, except those of our software products for which costs incurred between the date of product technological feasibility and the date that the software is available for general release are capitalized. We use a working model of the software or a detailed program design to assess technological feasibility. We capitalized software development costs of $209,000, $1.2 million, $0 and $0$593,000, for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008 and2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively. Capitalized software development costs are amortized to cost of sales based on the higher of a) the percentage of revenue for units delivered to total anticipated revenue for the related product, or b) on a straight-line basis.  Capitalized software development costs of $727,000$328,000 and $1.2 million were included in Other Assetsother assets at SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and June 30, 2008, respectively.

Income Taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Share Based Compensation

The fair value of share based payments is recognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the related vesting periods.  Share based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the portion of share based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest and has therefore been reduced for estimated forfeitures at the time of the grant, with subsequent revisions for the differences between actual and the estimated forfeiture rates.

Foreign Currency Translations

The financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are measured in their local currency and then translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method. Under the current rate method, assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates prevailing throughout the year.

Gains and losses resulting from the translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) and presented as part of stockholder’s equity. Realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains (losses) from the settlement of foreign currency transactions are reflected in other income (expense) and amounted to $9.0 million, $2.3 million, $(372,000)$193,000 and $193,000$(1.3 million) for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008 and2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

F-11
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income (loss) and equity adjustments relating to foreign currency translation, changes in fair value of certain derivatives and non-current marketable securities and adjustments to the minimum pension liability.

Earningsliability and is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) Per Share
We have not presented earnings (loss) per share data because all 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008 are held by one shareholder.
F-59
.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” to clarify the definition of fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value and expand the disclosures on fair value measurements.  SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price).  SFAS No. 157 also stipulates that, as a market-based measurement, fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (a) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (b) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).
In February This statement became effective for us on July 1, 2008 the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statementwith respect to financial assets and liabilities.  The additional disclosures required by SFAS No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13.”  This FSP amends SFAS 157 to exclude certain leasing transactions accounted for under previously existing accounting guidance.  However, this scope exception does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumedare included in a business combination, regardless of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases.Note 10.
 
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date for FASB Statement No. 157.”  This FSP permits the delayed application of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, as defined in this FSP, except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least annually, until the beginning of our fiscal 2010.  As of July 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 (see Note 8)10), with the exception of its application to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which we will deferdeferred in accordance with FSP No. FAS 157-2.  We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS No. 157 at the beginning of fiscal 2010 for such nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.

In October 2008,April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3,157-4, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the MarketVolume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Asset IsAre Not Active,Orderly.” which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active andThis FSP provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining theadditional guidance for estimating fair value ofin accordance with SFAS No. 157 when there has been a significant decrease in market activity for a financial asset or liability in relation to normal activity and circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. An entity is required to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was distressed on the weight of the evidence presented.  This FSP also re-affirms that the objective of fair value, when the market for that financialan asset is not active.active, is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly market (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction).  Additional enhanced disclosures are also required in accordance with this FSP.  FSP No. FAS 157-4 became effective for us for the quarter ending June 30, 2009.  The adoption of FSP is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued.  Revisions resulting from a change in the valuation technique or its application should be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate following the guidance in SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.”  However, the disclosure provisions in SFAS 154 for a change in accounting estimate are not required for revisions resulting from a change in valuation technique or its application.  We adopted SFAS 157 beginning in our fiscal 2009 first quarter.  We used these key considerations in evaluating the fair value measurements of our financial assets (see Note 8) and recorded a $1.2 million valuation allowance against the value ofNo. FAS 157-4 applied to our auction rate securities.securities and did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements (see Note 10). 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” to permit all entities to choose to elect, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value.  An entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date, and recognize upfront costs and fees related to those items in earnings as incurred and not deferred.  SFAS No. 159 became effective for us as of July 1, 2008.  As we did not elect the fair value option for our financial instruments (other than those already measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157), the adoption of this standardStatement did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
F-12

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” principally to require publicly traded companies to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements.  FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 became effective for us during our quarter ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this disclosure-only guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (“FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2”).  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 provides additional guidance on the timing of impairment recognition and greater clarity about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold.  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 also requires additional disclosures about impairments in interim and annual reporting periods.  FSP No. FAS 115-2/124-2 became effective for us during our quarter ending June 30, 2009.  The adoption of FSP No. FAS 115/124-2 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Among other changes, under SFAS No. 141(R), the fair value of contingent consideration would be recorded on the acquisition date.  SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for acquisitions consummated by us on or after July 1, 2009.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies,” to require that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably determined.  If the fair value of such assets or liabilities cannot be reasonably determined, then they would generally be recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” and FASB Interpretation No. 14, “Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5.”  This FSP also amends the subsequent accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination and certain other disclosure requirements.  This FSP is effective for us for acquisitionsassets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations that are consummated on or after July 1, 2009.

F-60

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51.” SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the provisions of SFAS No. 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.”  SFAS 161 requires companies to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, quantitative disclosures of the fair values and gains and losses of these derivative instruments in a tabular format, as well as more information about liquidity by requiring disclosure of a derivative contract’s credit-risk-related contingent features.  SFAS 161 also requires cross-referencing within footnotes to enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. We are currently evaluating the disclosure requirements of SFAS 161. As this is a disclosure-only standard, there will be no impact on our consolidated financial statements as a result of its adoption. SFAS 161 becomes effective for our March 2009 interim consolidated financial statements.

F-13
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.”  This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This FSP also adds certain disclosures to those already prescribed in SFAS No. 142.  This FSP 142-3 becomes effective for the annual and interim periods within the year, beginning in our fiscal 2010. The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.”  This FSP provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years.  Upon  The adoption a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions in this FSP.  Early application of this FSP is prohibited.  Wenot expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements when adopted on July 1, 2009.
In November 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on EITF Issue No. 08-6, “Accounting for Equity Method Investment Considerations.”  EITF No. 08-6 addresses questions about the potential effect of SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160 on equity-method accounting.  The primary issues include how the initial carrying value of an equity method investment should be determined, how to account for any subsequent purchases and sales of additional ownership interests, and whether the investor must separately assess its underlying share of the investee’s indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment.  The adoption of EITF No. 08-6 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements because we have no equity method investments and is effective on a prospective basis beginning in our fiscal 2010.  The adoption date of EITF No. 08-6 coincides with that of SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160. 
In June 2009, the FASB issued any share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rightsSFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162,” which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to dividends or dividend equivalents.be applied in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP.  This Statement explicitly recognizes the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  The adoption of this Statement will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements when adopted in our quarter ending September 30, 2009.

2.          Discontinued Operations

As a result of continued operating losses, in June 2007 our then boardBoard of directorsDirectors approved a formal plan to divest our radar business (“Radar”) and to seek a strategic buyer. This business had previously been included in the Test Solutions segment.  As a result of this decision, the operating results of Radar, net of taxes, had been classified in the consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.presented and we recorded a $1.6 million ($1.0 million, net of tax) impairment charge in June 2007 based upon appraisals of the business performed by third parties, which resulted in the write-off of $771,000 of goodwill and $322,000 of equipment, with the balance reducing inventory. We recorded a lossfurther losses on disposal of $3.7 million ($2.4 million, net of tax) in the predecessor period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, to reflect the net assets of Radar at their net realizable value based on the May 15, 2008 sale of the business for $750,000. The sale agreement provided for additional contingent consideration, which iswas not included in the calculation of the loss on disposal as realization iswas not probable.

F-14

Net sales and income (loss) from discontinued operations (including impairment charges), which were solely related to Radar, were as follows:

F-61

  Three Months Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to 
  September 30, 2008  September 30, 2007  August 14, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
          
 Net sales $-  $207  $120 
             
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes $-  $(1,182) $(3,861)
 Income tax (benefit)  -   (220)  (1,353)
 Income (loss) from discontinued operations $-  $(962) $(2,508)

In March 2005, we sold the net assets of our shock and vibration control device manufacturing business (“VMC”).  Under the terms of the sale agreements, we retained certain liabilities relating to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the premises occupied by VMC as of the date of sale.  We recorded a liability for the estimated remediation costs related to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the VMC premises when it was sold.  The accrued environmental liability at September 30, 2008 is $1.2 million, of which $322,000 is expected to be paid within one year.
        Fiscal Year 
  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
          
Net sales $893  $120  $6,422 
             
Income (loss) from discontinued            
operations before income taxes $(5,928) $(3,861) $(6,041)
Income tax (benefit)  (1,107)  (1,353)  (2,173)
Income (loss) from            
discontinued operations $(4,821) $(2,508) $(3,868)

3.         Company Sale Transaction

On March 2, 2007, we entered into an agreement to be acquired by investment entities affiliated with General Atlantic LLC and Francisco Partners II, L.P. (“GA” and “Francisco”). The agreement contained a provision under which we were permitted to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties through April 18, 2007.  In the event we accepted a superior proposal received prior to April 19, 2007, a breakup fee of $15 million plus up to $7.5 million of expenses would be payable by the Company. On May 25, 2007, upon entering into the merger agreement described below, we provided a letter of termination to affiliates of GA and Francisco that the merger with them was terminated (“Terminated Merger”).  In connection with such termination, we paid a $22.5 million breakup fee, as we determined that the acquisition proposal, that resulted in the merger agreement, constituted a superior proposal.

On June 4, 2007, an affiliate of GA and Francisco filed an action against us alleging, among other things, that we breached the terminated merger agreement by paying GA and Francisco a breakup fee of $22.5 million instead of $37.5 million that GA and Francisco contended they were owed. We settled this action for $2.5 million in January 2008, which is reflected in the results of operations for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007.

On August 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by and merged with AX Acquisition Corp. (“AX Acquisition”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AX Holding Corp. (the “Parent”), (the “Merger”).  Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and each share of common stock of the Company then outstanding was converted into a right to receive $14.50 in cash. Therefore, on August 15, 2007 each holder of shares of our common stock no longer had any rights with respect to the shares, except for the right to receive the merger consideration. The merger agreement also provided that all of our stock options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment equal to the number of shares of our common stock underlying the options multiplied by the amount, if any, by which $14.50 exceeded the exercise price of the option, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. The aggregate merger consideration paid to our shareholders and stock option holders was approximately $1.1 billion.

The Merger was funded by a $378.4 million equity investment in Parent by Veritas, Golden Gate and GS Direct (collectively, the “Sponsors”) and certain members of our management andmanagement.  In addition, primarily in order to finance the majorityMerger, on August 15, 2007 the Company entered into a $575 million senior secured credit facility, which consisted of the proceeds from$525 million of term loans aggregating $525and a $50 million revolving credit facility, and two exchangeable senior unsecured credit facilities totaling $345 million.  Anmillion (see Note 11).

F-15

Upon the closing of the Merger, we paid severance of approximately $6.7 million, $18.6 million of Merger transaction expenses, a $22 million advisory fee to the Sponsors or their affiliates and $18.3 million in financing costs.

Upon consummation of the Merger, we entered into a new employment agreement with one of our officers that, in addition to specified annual remuneration and bonuses, provided for a one-time bonus of $887,000 which was recorded as compensation expense in the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, plus $3.7 million for a covenant not to compete which is being amortized over the seven year term, both of which were paid in January 2008.

At the closing of the Merger, we entered into an advisory agreement with the non-management equity investorsSponsors or their designated affiliates requires us to payunder which the Sponsors will provide certain advisory services to us.  We will pay an annual advisory fee in the aggregate amount of the greater of $2.2 million, or 1.8% of adjusted EBITDA for the prior fiscal year, as defined in the agreement, and transaction fees on all future financings and liquidity events. The advisory agreement has an initial term expiring on December 31, 2013 and will be automatically renewable for additional one year terms thereafter unless we or the Sponsors give notice of non-renewal.  The annual advisory fees paid amounted to $2.3 million for fiscal 2009.  Referand $2.1 million during the year ended June 30, 2009 and the period from August 15, 2007 to Note 3 to our June 30, 2008, annual financial statements for complete details of our Merger and a terminated merger.respectively.

In connection with the Merger and Terminated Merger, for the periods from August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, we incurred company sale transaction and related expenses that we expensed as incurred of $30.3$32.5 million, $3.7 million and $3.7$30.6 million, respectively, consisting primarily of merger-related severance and other change of control related payments, a merger termination fee and the related lawsuit settlement charge and legal and other professional fees (“Company Sale Transaction expenses”).

The Merger constituted a change in control of the Company. In accordance with GAAP, weThe Company recorded its assets and liabilities at fair value as of the date of the Merger, whereby the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Independent third-party appraisers were engaged to assist management and perform valuations of certain of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. We allocated the purchase price based on the appraisals associated with the valuation of certain acquired assets and assumed liabilities.

We allocated the purchase price, including the acquisition costs of approximately $22.9 million, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $45.5 million) $335,252 
Property, plant and equipment  111,804 
Other assets  16,537 
Developed technology  195,500 
Customer related intangible assets  211,582 
Other acquired intangible assets  6,290 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives (tradenames)  122,870 
Goodwill  452,756 
In-process research and development  24,340 
Total assets acquired  1,476,931 
Current liabilities  (137,751)
Long-term liabilities  (220,887)
Total liabilities assumed  (358,638)
Net assets acquired $1,118,293 
 
F-62F-16
 


  In thousands 
    
Current assets (excluding cash of $45.5 million) $335,252 
Property, plant and equipment  111,804 
Other assets  16,537 
Developed technology  195,500 
Customer related intangible assets  211,582 
Other acquired intangible assets  6,290 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives (tradenames)  122,870 
Goodwill  452,756 
In-process research and development  24,340 
   Total assets acquired  1,476,931 
Current liabilities  (137,751)
Long-term liabilities  (220,887)
   Total liabilities assumed  (358,638)
   Net assets acquired $1,118,293 

At the acquisition date, the acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D)(“IPR&D”) was not considered to have reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future uses. Therefore, the fair value of the IPR&D of $24.3 million was expensed at the time of the acquisition in operating costs. The allocation to in-process research and developmentIPR&D represents the estimated fair value of such incomplete research and development, at the acquisition date, based on future cash flows.  As of the acquisition date, cash flows from these projects were expected to commence in fiscal year 2009. In determining the fair values of IPR&D, risk adjusted discount rates that ranged from 17% to 25% were applied to the projects’ cash flows, which have taken into account the respective projects’ completion percentage.

The unaudited pro forma results of operations presented below for the period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 are presented as though the Merger had occurred on July 1, 2006, after giving effect to purchase accounting adjustments relating to depreciation and amortization of the revalued assets, interest expense associated with the new credit facilities and other acquisition-related adjustments in connection with the Merger.Merger and our acquisition of MicroMetrics (which was consummated on April 12, 2007) as if it occurred on July 1, 2006. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the combined results that would have occurred had the Merger been consummated at July 1, 2006, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.

 Period from  Period from  Fiscal Year 
 July 1, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
 August 14, 2007  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
 Predecessor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
         
Net sales $38,178  $38,178  $598,241 
Net income (loss) $(27,554) $(27,554) $(123,105)

4.         Acquisition of Businesses and Intangible Assets

MicroMetrics, Inc.

On April 12, 2007, we purchased the outstanding stock of MicroMetrics, Inc. (“MMI”) for $9.9 million of cash and repaid approximately $700,000 of MMI’s bank debt.  MMI, located in New Hampshire, is a design and full service manufacturer of both standard and application specific RF/Microwave diodes and semiconductor devices. MMI strengthens our high-reliability, high-performance RF/Microwave product portfolio of semiconductor solutions.  MMI is included in our Microelectronic Solutions segment.

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $72,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $9,000) $3,250 
Property, plant and equipment  1,147 
Customer related intangibles  2,600 
Non-compete arrangements  590 
Tradenames  70 
Goodwill  4,633 
Total assets acquired  12,290 
Current liabilities  (1,619)
Long term debt  (8)
Total liabilities assumed  (1,627)
Net assets acquired $10,663 
F-17
The customer related intangibles and non-compete arrangements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 2 to 9.5 years.  The tradenames have an indefinite life.  The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

On a pro forma basis, had the MMI acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Test Evolution Corporation

On October 1, 2007, we purchased 40% of the outstanding stock of Test Evolution Corporation (“TEC”) for $4.0 million ($2.0 million at closing and $2.0 million paid in October 2008). TEC, located in Massachusetts, develops and manufactures digital, analog and RF semiconductor automated test equipment. We have determined that we have control of this company and have consolidated TEC’s assets and liabilities and results of operations, all of which were insignificant, into our financial statements commencing October 1, 2007. The non-controlling interest of 60% in each of the equity and operations of TEC are not material to our consolidated financial statements and have been included in other long-term liabilities and other income (expense), respectively.  TEC is included in our Test Solutions segment.

F-63
Gaisler Research AB

On June 30, 2008, we acquired the stock of Gaisler Research AB (“Gaisler”) for $12.7$12.3 million cash (net of $2.7 million cash acquired), plus up to another $15 million over the next three years provided specified EBITDA targets are achieved. Gaisler achieved the fiscal year 2009 EBITDA target, and as such, an additional $4 million will be paid to the selling shareholders in October 2009, which has been added to goodwill in the accompanying June 30, 2009 consolidated balance sheet. Located in Sweden, Gaisler provides integrated circuit software products and services to European space system suppliers, plus other U.S., Japanese and Russian space agencies. Gaisler is included in our Microelectronic Solutions segment.

We preliminarilyallocated the purchase price, including the $4 million of earned contingent consideration and acquisition costs of approximately $432,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $2.7 million) $987 
Property, plant and equipment  62 
Developed technology  7,550 
Customer related intangibles  1,030 
Non-compete arrangements  1,820 
Tradenames  1,190 
Goodwill  6,122 
In-process research and development  2,300 
Total assets acquired  21,061 
Current liabilities  (1,076)
Deferred taxes  (3,245)
Total liabilities assumed  (4,321)
Net assets acquired $16,740 

The developed technology, customer related intangibles, non-compete arrangements, and tradenames are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 8 years.  The goodwill is not  deductible for tax purposes.

F-18
On a pro forma basis, had the Gaisler acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

VI Technology, Inc.

On March 4, 2009, we acquired 100% of the stock of VI Technology, Inc. (“VI Tech”).  We paid $5.0 million in cash for approximately 29% of the stock of VI Tech, and the remaining approximately 71% of VI Tech stock was acquired by a limited liability company (“parent LLC”), that is our ultimate parent, in exchange for Class A membership interests in parent LLC with a fair value of $12.7 million.  Immediately following the consummation of these transactions, parent LLC contributed the 71% of VI Tech stock to the Company, giving us 100% ownership in VI Tech.  VI Tech, located in Austin, Texas, designs and manufactures independent automated test systems.  VI Tech is included in our Test Solutions segment.

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $379,000,$407,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  In thousands 
    
Current assets (excluding cash of $2.7 million) $987 
Property, plant and equipment  62 
Developed technology  2,920 
Customer related intangibles  1,650 
Tradenames  508 
Goodwill  8,424 
In-process research and development  635 
   Total assets acquired  15,186 
Current liabilities  (1,096)
Deferred taxes  (1,423)
   Total liabilities assumed  (2,519)
   Net assets acquired $12,667 
As of September 30, 2008, we were in the process of completing our assessment of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities as of the date of acquisition which is expected to be finalized upon the receipt and completion of additional information and analysis during fiscal 2009.
  (In thousands) 
Current assets (excluding cash of $107,000) $3,022 
Property, plant and equipment  149 
Other assets  37 
Developed technology  2,990 
Customer related intangibles  4,470 
Non-compete arrangements  1,600 
Tradenames  1,190 
Goodwill  10,501 
Total assets acquired  23,959 
Current liabilities  (1,878)
Deferred taxes  (4,081)
Total liabilities assumed  (5,959)
Net assets acquired $18,000 

The developed technology, customer related intangibles, non-compete arrangements, and developed technologytradenames are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 76 years.  The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

On a pro forma basis, had the GaislerVI Tech acquisition taken place as of the beginning of fiscal 2008,the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Airflyte Electronics Company

On June 26, 2009, we acquired the net assets of Airflyte Electronics Company (“Airflyte”) for $11.0 million cash plus up to another $3 million provided specified EBITDA targets are achieved in fiscal 2010.  Airflyte, located in Naples, Florida, designs and manufactures custom-engineered slip rings for high-performance defense, commercial and industrial applications. Airflyte is included in our Microelectronic Solutions segment.

F-19

We allocated the purchase price, including acquisition costs of approximately $270,000, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

  (In thousands) 
Current assets $4,724 
Property, plant and equipment  76 
Other assets  47 
Customer related intangibles  4,020 
Tradenames  1,200 
Goodwill  1,758 
Total assets acquired  11,825 
Current liabilities assumed  (555)
Net assets acquired $11,270 

The customer related intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a range of 1 to 6 years.  The tradenames have an indefinite life.  The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

On a pro forma basis, had the Airflyte acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, our results of operations for those periods would not have been materially affected.

Intangible Assets with Definite Lives

The components of amortizable intangible assets are as follows:

 June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008 
 (Successor)  (Successor) 
 September 30, 2008  June 30, 2008  (In thousands) 
 (In thousands)             
 Gross     Gross     Gross     Gross    
 Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying  Accumulated 
 Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amortization 
                        
Developed technology $194,561  $37,419  $198,420  $29,631  $197,684  $62,021  $198,420  $29,631 
Customer related intangibles  210,881   51,251   213,232   42,433  216,956  69,339  213,232  42,433 
Non-compete arrangements  6,290   1,302   6,290   1,012  10,090  2,692  6,290  1,012 
Tradenames  2,105   230   -   - 
Total $411,732  $89,972  $417,942  $73,076  $426,835  $134,282  $417,942  $73,076 
F-64

The aggregate amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets was $18.0$63.0 million, $10.5$73.1 million, $1.7 million and $1.7$13.0 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008 and2009, for the periods August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the twelve-month periodsnext five fiscal years ending SeptemberJune 30, is as follows:

 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
      
2009 $59,282 
2010  58,255  $61,949 
2011  57,964   60,748 
2012  56,824   60,479 
2013  47,910   54,525 
2014  27,833 
F-20
Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual impairment test of indefinite lived intangible assets and, due to a decline in the Radar Frequency Microwave reporting unit’s (“RFMW”)  operating results during fiscal 2009 and additional revisions to internal forecasts, we wrote-off approximately $6.0 million of tradenames with indefinite lives related to the RFMW reporting unit.

Goodwill

The carrying amount of goodwill is as follows:

 AMS  ATS  Total  AMS  ATS  Total 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                  
Balance at June 30, 2007 (predecessor entity) $51,321  $130,641  $181,962  $51,321  $130,641  $181,962 
Goodwill adjustment recorded in purchase accounting from allocation of purchase price (1)  243,456   27,373   270,829 
Goodwill adjustment recorded in purchase            
accounting from allocation of purchase price (1)
  243,456   27,373   270,829 
Balance at August 15, 2007 (successor entity)  294,777   158,014   452,791   294,777   158,014   452,791 
Acquisition of Test Evolution Corporation  -   1,868   1,868   -   1,868   1,868 
Acquisition of Gaisler  8,261   -   8,261   8,261   -   8,261 
Impact of foreign currency translation  (268)  (1,497)  (1,765)  (268)  (1,497)  (1,765)
Balance at June 30, 2008 (successor entity)  302,770   158,385   461,155   302,770   158,385   461,155 
Final adjustment to goodwill recorded in purchase accounting  494   (529)  (35)
Adjustment to goodwill for acquisition of Gaisler  163   -   163 
Final adjustment to goodwill related to the Merger  494   (529)  (35)
Adjustment to goodwill for acquisitions (2)
  (4,206)  10,501   6,295 
Gaisler 2009 earned contingent consideration  4,000   -   4,000 
Impairment of goodwill  (35,200)  -   (35,200)
Impact of foreign currency translation  (1,175)  (3,915)  (5,090)  (1,045)  (7,037)  (8,082)
Balance at September 30, 2008 (successor entity) $302,252  $153,941  $456,193 
Balance at June 30, 2009 (successor entity) $266,813  $161,320  $428,133 

 (1)  
(1)The predecessor entity goodwill has been written off in purchase accounting for the Merger.
(2)Goodwill in the AMS segment was adjusted primarily due to the finalization of purchase accounting for the Gaisler acquisition in the amount of $(6.2) million offset by goodwill recorded for the Airflyte acquisition of $1.8 million. Goodwill in the ATS segment was adjusted due to purchase accounting for the VI Tech acquisition in the amount of $10.5 million.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual impairment test of goodwill has been written offand, due to a decline in purchase accounting for the Merger.
RFMW reporting unit’s operating results and additional revisions to internal forecasts during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge related to the RFMW reporting unit of $35.2 million.

5.      Restructuring Charges

In fiscal 2007, we initiated and completed restructuring activity in the Wireless division of our Test Solutions businesses in the United Kingdom.  Pursuant to the plan, 23 employees were terminated, resulting in $1.4 million of severance costs, and certain contract positions were eliminated.  We also abandoned a leased facility and recorded a fixed asset impairment charge, which in the aggregate amounted to $1.3 million.  During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, we recorded approximately $2.8 million in restructuring costs including the write-off of $753,000 of net fixed assets, all in research and development costs except for $35,000 allocated to selling, general and administrative costs, and all of which was paid as of June 30, 2007.

F-21

In fiscal 2008, we initiated additional actions to restructure our United KingdomU.K. business units by further consolidating our manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative activities. In addition, we initiated a restructuring in our Whippany, New Jersey, component manufacturing facility to address a slowdown in sales of its integrated products line.  These actions resulted in the termination of approximately 120 employees, which resulted in restructuring costs, principally severance, for the periods from August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 of $31,000 (all$7.0 million ($987,000 in cost of sales, $2.1 million in selling, general and administrative costs and $3.9 million in research and development costs) and $3.8 million ($1.6 million in selling, general and administrative costs and $2.2 million in research and development costs), respectively. Substantially all of the workforce reduction costs were paid prior to June 30, 2008. Other restructuring chargesFacility closure costs include $2.6 million of accrued contractual commitments under operating leases for two facilities in the U.K. that we exited in May 2008, which will be paid through December 2010. In addition,Included in the restructuring costs was approximately $485,000 of fixed asset impairment charges that were recorded in selling, general and administrative costs in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 for the write-off of leasehold improvements in the abandoned facilities.

F-65

InFor the first quarterfiscal year ended June 30, 2009, in connection with continued restructuring activities of fiscal 2009,certain manufacturing operations, we incurred $402,000$3.8 million of severance costs for an additional eleven103 employees terminated primarily in our U.K. business unit and $294,000 of facility closure costs ($306,0002.9 million in cost of sales, $32,000$686,000 in S,G&Aselling, general and $64,000administrative costs and $496,000 in research and development)development costs).

The following table sets forth the charges and payments related to the restructuring liability for the periods indicated:

  Balance           Balance 
  June 30,           September 30, 
  2008  Three Months Ended September 30, 2008     2008 
           Effect of    
  Restructuring        foreign  Restructuring 
  Liability  Net Additions  Cash Payments  currency  Liability 
  (In thousands) 
Work force reduction $12  $402  $(414) $-  $- 
                     
Other  3,242   -   (334)  (315)  2,593 
                     
Total $3,254  $402  $(748) $(315) $2,593 
  Balance           Balance 
  June 30,     June 30, 
  
2008
  
Year Ended June 30, 2009
  
2009
 
     (Successor)    
           Effect of    
  Restructuring        foreign  Restructuring 
  
Liability
  
Net Additions
  
Cash Payments
  
currency
  
Liability
 
  (In thousands) 
Work force               
reduction $12  $3,808  $(3,092) $28  $756 
                     
Closure of                    
facilities  3,242   294   (1,166)  (648)  1,722 
                     
Total $3,254  $4,102  $(4,258) $(620) $2,478 

     
Year Ended June 30, 20 08
       
  Balance  July 1,  August 15,  July 1,  August 15,     Balance 
  June 30,  2007 to  2007 to  2007 to  2007 to     June 30, 
  
2007
  August 14,  June 30,  August 14,  June 30,  Effect of  
2008
 
  Restructuring  2007  2008  2007  2008  foreign  Restructuring 
  
Liability
  
Net Additions
  
Cash Payments
  
currency
  
Liability
 
     
Predecessor
  
Successor
  
Predecessor
  
Successor
       
        (In thousands)          
Work force                     
reduction $-  $3,778  $3,270  $(1,186) $(5,850) $-  $12 
                             
Closure of                            
facilities  -   -   3,230   -   -   12   3,242 
                             
Total $-  $3,778  $6,500  $(1,186) $(5,850) $12  $3,254 
F-22

6. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

 June 30,  June 30, 
 September 30,  June 30,  2009  2008 
 2008  2008  Successor  Successor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
            
Raw materials $60,632  $64,533  $67,388  $64,533 
Work in process  52,182   41,056  47,185  41,056 
Finished goods  24,163   29,302   21,030   29,302 
 $136,977  $134,891  $135,603  $134,891 

7. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

  June 30, Estimated
  2009  2008 Useful Life
  Successor  Successor In Years
  (In thousands)  
        
Land $16,846  $17,120  
Buildings and leasehold improvements  32,461   31,541 1 to 40
Machinery and equipment  79,836   63,469 2 to 12
Furniture and fixtures  13,836   12,925 2 to 10
   142,979   125,055  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  42,072   20,406  
  $100,907  $104,649  

Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment was $21.4 million, $20.0 million, $2.0 million and $17.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, for the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

8.        Product Warranty
 
We warrant our products against defects in design, materials and workmanship, generally for one year from their date of shipment. A provision for estimated future costs relating to these warranties is recorded when the related revenue is recognized and is included in cost of sales. Quarterly we analyze our warranty liability for reasonableness based on a 15-month history of warranty costs incurred, the nature of the products shipped subject to warranty and anticipated warranty trends.

F-66F-23

Activity related to our product warranty liability, which is reflected in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, was as follows:

 Fiscal Year       
 Three Months Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to 
 September 30, 2008  September 30, 2007  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007 
 Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Successor  Successor  Predecessor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                  
Balance at beginning of period $2,944  $3,002  $2,929  $2,944  $3,002  $2,929 
Provision for warranty obligations  618   629   469  3,081  2,192  469 
Cost of warranty obligations  (654)  (576)  (394) (3,207) (2,259) (394)
Foreign currency impact  (100)  12   (2)  (173)  9   (2)
Balance at end of period $2,808  $3,067  $3,002  $2,645  $2,944  $3,002 

8.9.        Derivative Financial Instruments

We adopted SFAS No. 161 “Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” as of January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements as it is a disclosure-only standard. We address certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. We enter into interest rate swap derivatives to manage the effects of interest rate movements on portions of our debt. We also enter into foreign currency forward contracts, not designated as hedging instruments, to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates.

The fair values of our derivative financial instruments included in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 are presented as follows:

  Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives 
  Balance Sheet   Balance Sheet   
(In thousands) Location 
Fair Value(1)
 Location 
Fair Value(1)
 
Derivatives designated as hedging         
   instruments:         
   Interest rate swap contracts     Other long-term   
  Not applicable $-    liabilities $15,621 
            
Derivatives not designated as hedging           
   instruments:           
   Foreign currency forward contracts      Accrued expenses and    
  Not applicable  -    other current liabilities  195 
            
          Total Derivatives   $-   $15,816 
(1) See Note 10 for further information about how the fair values of derivative assets and liabilities are determined.
F-24
The amounts of the gains and losses related to our derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:

    Location of Gain or (Loss) Amount of Gain or (Loss) 
  Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Reclassified from 
  Recognized in OCI on Derivative Accumulated OCI into Accumulated OCI into 
(In thousands) 
(Effective Portion) (1)
 Income (Effective Portion) Income (Effective Portion) 
  Fiscal Year   Fiscal Year 
Derivatives in Cash Flow Ended   Ended 
Hedging Relationships June 30, 2009   June 30, 2009 
        
Interest rate swap contracts $(17,862) Interest expense $(7,061) 

(1)  See Note 13 for additional information on changes to other accumulated comprehensive income (loss).

The amounts of the gains and losses related to our derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:

  Location of Gain or (Loss) Amount of Gain or (Loss) 
  Recognized in Earnings on Recognized in Earnings on 
(In thousands) Derivative Derivative 
    Fiscal Year 
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging   Ended 
Instruments:   June 30, 2009 
      
Foreign currency forward contracts Other income (expense) $(208) 

Interest Rate Swap Cash-Flow Hedges

We enter into interest rate swap contracts to manage the effects of interest rate movements on portions of our debt. Such contracts effectively fix the borrowing rates on floating rate debt to limit the exposure against the risk of rising rates.  We do not enter into interest rate swap contracts for speculative purposes and we have entered into transactions with counterparties that are rated investment grade. Our interest rate swap contracts, all of which were entered into in fiscal 2008 for an aggregate notional amount of $475 million, have varying maturities through February 2011.

Foreign Currency Contract Derivatives

Foreign currency contracts are used to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates. We enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges. The change in fair value is included in income as it occurs, within other income (expense). As of June 30, 2009, we had $30.0 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through July 31, 2009. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of the Company, but are used in the calculation of cash settlements under the contracts.

10.     Fair Value Measurements

We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities as of July 1, 2008.  In connection with the adoption2008 and, as of SFAS 157, weJune 30, 2009, have recorded a $1.2$2.3 million valuation allowance against the valuecost of our auction rate securities.  SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires thean entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.


F-25
SFAS 157 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 2:Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3:Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.  The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instruments valuation.

The following table presents for each hierarchy level, financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of SeptemberJune 30, 2008:2009:

  Quoted Prices in          
  Active Markets  Significant Other  Significant    
  for Identical  Observable  Unobservable    
  Assets  Inputs  Inputs    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Assets:            
Non-current marketable securities $-  $-  $17,677  $17,677 
Liabilities:                
Foreign currency forward                
contracts $-  $195  $-  $195 
Interest rate swap contracts  -   15,621   -   15,621 
Total Liabilities $-  $15,816  $-  $15,816 

The following table presents the changes in the carrying value of the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), as defined in SFAS No. 157, for the year ended June 30, 2009:

  Quoted Prices in          
  Active Markets  Significant Other  Significant    
  for Identical  Observable  Unobservable    
  Assets  Inputs  Inputs    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Assets:            
Non-current marketable securities $-  $-  $18,755  $18,755 
Liabilities:                
Foreign currency forward contracts $-  $152  $-  $152 
Interest rate swap contracts  -   665   -   665 
   Total Liabilities $-  $817  $-  $817 
  Fair Value Measurements 
  Using Significant 
  Unobservable Inputs 
  (Level 3) 
  Auction 
  Rate 
  Securities 
  (In thousands) 
    
Balance at June 30, 2008 $- 
Transfers to Level 3  19,945 
Total unrealized losses in accumulated    
other comprehensive income (loss)  (2,268)
Balance at June 30, 2009 $17,677 

 
F-67F-26
 

The change in the fair value of Level 3 financial assets impacted net income (loss) and Other Comprehensive Income by $0 and $755,000, net of tax, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts – The fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts were valued using a pricing model with all significant inputs based on observable market data such as measurement date spot and forward rates.

Non-Current Marketable Securities – Non-current marketable securities consist of auction rate securities that currently have no active market from which we could obtain pricing.  Since we adopted SFAS 157 on July 1, 2008, auction rate securities have been classified as Level 3 as their valuation requires substantial judgment and estimation of factors that are not currently observable in the market due to the lack of trading in the securities.  Since February 2008, when auctions for these securities began to fail, we have redeemed $26.5$27.5 million of Auction Rate Securitiesauction rate securities at par.par, including $1.0 million owned at June 30, 2009, which were redeemed at par in July 2009. The $1.0 million redeemed in July 2009 are classified as non-current marketable securities as of June 30, 2009, as we were not aware at the balance sheet date that these auction rate securities would be redeemed.  To date, we have collected all interest payments on all of our Auction Rate Securitiesauction rate securities when due. Furthermore, we have the intent and are able to hold these securities until the credit markets recover, or until maturity,their maturities, which range from 2029 through 2042, if necessary.   However, based on a discounted cash flow analysis, which considered, among other items, the collateral underlying the securities, the credit worthiness of the issuer, the timing of future cash flows and liquidity risks, we have recorded a $1.2$2.3 million valuation allowance against the auction rate securities.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts – The fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts were valued using a pricing model with all significant inputs based on observable market data such as measurement date spot and forward rates.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts – The fair value of our outstanding interest rate swap contracts were based on valuations received from the counterparties and corroborated by measurement date equivalent swap rates.

9.11.        Long Term Debt and Credit Agreements

On August 7, 2008, the 11.75%15, 2007, we entered into a $575 million senior secured credit facility, which consisted of $525 million of term loans and a $50 million revolving credit facility, and two exchangeable senior unsecured loan in the amountcredit facilities totaling $345 million.  Total long term debt, outstanding as of $225 million with an ultimate maturity on February 15, 2015 was refinanced with an unsecured senior note with the same interest rateJune 30, 2009 and maturity date.  We may prepay the senior notes commencing August 15, 2011 at 105.875%2008, consists of the following:

   June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008 
   Successor  Successor 
   (In thousands) 
Revolving credit facility(a) $-  $- 
Senior secured B-1 term loan(b)  393,000   397,000 
Senior secured B-2 term loan(c)  122,813   124,063 
Total senior secured debt   515,813   521,063 
Senior unsecured notes(d)  225,000   225,000 
Senior subordinated unsecured term loan(e)  147,450   131,340 
Other   1,085   1,408 
Total debt   889,348   878,811 
Less current maturities   5,590   5,574 
Total long term debt  $883,758  $873,237 

The following is a summary of required principal amount prepaid, which decreases to 102.938% on August 15, 2012repayments of our debt for the next five years and to 100% on or after August 15, 2013.  thereafter as of June 30, 2009:

Year ending June 30, (In thousands) 
2010 $5,590 
2011  5,610 
2012  5,635 
2013  5,250 
2014  5,250 
Thereafter  862,013 
  $889,348 

(a)The revolving credit facility provides for borrowings of up to $50 million through August 15, 2013 at a rate based on the LIBOR rate (3 month period) plus 325 basis points (4.125% at June 30, 2009). The senior secured credit facility allows us to utilize up to $25 million of the revolving credit facility for letters of credit and up to $5 million for a swing loan.  At June 30, 2009, there are no outstanding amounts or letters of credit issued against the facility.  Any borrowings would be secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.  We are obligated to pay a 0.5% fee on any undrawn revolver commitments.

F-27

(b)The B-1 term loan in the original amount of $400 million matures on August 15, 2014 and bears interest at a rate based on the selected LIBOR rate.  At June 30, 2009, $375 million is at the 3 month LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points (4.125% at June 30, 2009) and $18 million is at the 1 month LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points (3.625% at June 30, 2009). The B-1 term loan has scheduled quarterly repayments of $1 million that commenced December 31, 2007 and continue through June 30, 2014, with $373 million due on August 15, 2014.  The borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, excluding those of our foreign subsidiaries.

In addition, we may redeem up to 35% ofOctober 2007, the original aggregate principal balance of the senior notes, at any time prior to August 15, 2010, with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings at 111.75% of the principal amount redeemed.  We haveCompany entered into an interest rate swap agreement for $125 million of this loan, which expires November 15, 2010, effectively fixing the interest rate on this portion of the loan at 8.21% for that period. In April 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for an additional $250 million which expires February 15, 2011, effectively fixing the interest rate on this portion of the loan at 6.23%.  After considering the swaps, the effective interest rate on the total amount outstanding under the B-1 term loan is 6.74% at June 30, 2009.

(c)The B-2 term loan in the original amount of $125 million matures on August 15, 2014 and bears interest at a rate based on the selected LIBOR rate.  At June 30, 2009, $100 million is at the 3 month LIBOR rate plus 375 basis points (4.625% at June 30, 2009) and $23 million is at the 1 month LIBOR rate plus 375 basis points (4.125% at June 30, 2009). The B-2 term loan has scheduled quarterly repayments of $312,500 that commenced December 31, 2007 and continue through June 30, 2014, with $116.6 million due on August 15, 2014.  The borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, excluding those of our foreign subsidiaries.

In April 2008, the Company entered into two $50 million interest rate swap agreements that expire February 16, 2010 and February 15, 2011, effectively fixing the interest rate on the respective portions of the loan at 6.46% and 6.74%, respectively.  After considering the swaps, the effective interest rate on the total amount outstanding for the B-2 term loan is 6.14% at June 30, 2009.

(d)On August 7, 2008, our 11.75% exchangeable senior unsecured loan in the amount of $225 million with an ultimate maturity on February 15, 2015 was refinanced with unsecured senior notes with the same interest rate and maturity date.  We may prepay the senior notes commencing August 15, 2011 at 105.875% of the principal amount prepaid, which decreases to 102.938% on August 15, 2012 and to 100% on or after August 15, 2013.  In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal balance of the senior notes, at any time prior to August 15, 2010, with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings at 111.75% of the principal amount redeemed.  On January 21, 2009, the SEC declared effective our exchange offer registration statement which resulted in the exchange of the unregistered unsecured senior notes for publicly registered 11.75% unsecured senior notes due February 15, 2015 with substantially identical terms as the exchanged notes.

(e)The senior subordinated unsecured term loan in the original amount of $120 million bears interest at 11.75% and matures on February 15, 2015.  On September 21, 2007 we repaid an exchangeable senior subordinated unsecured loan with the proceeds from this term loan.  Interest on the loan is payable entirely by adding such interest to the unpaid principal amount of the loan through August 15, 2010, which through June 30, 2009 amounted to $27.5 million. Subsequent to August 15, 2010 interest on the term loan is payable in cash.   We may prepay the term loan commencing August 15, 2011 at 105.875% of the principal amount prepaid, which decreases to 102.9375% on August 15, 2012 and to 100% on or after August 15, 2013.

F-28

The senior secured credit facility agreement provides that if the Company sells assets (with certain exceptions) or issues new debt or equity securities to file an exchange offer registration statementunrelated parties, the proceeds must be used to prepay term or revolving credit loans.  In addition, commencing October 1, 2008, to the extent we have consolidated excess cash flows, as defined in the senior secured credit agreement, we must use specified portions of the excess cash flows to prepay senior secured debt.

Financial covenants in the senior secured credit facility consist of a maximum leverage ratio of total debt (less up to $15 million of cash) to adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, and maximum consolidated capital expenditures. Additional covenants include restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, dividends, disposition of assets, acquisitions and transactions with the SEC by February 3, 2009 to publicly register debt securities withshareholders and affiliates.

The senior unsecured notes and loan agreements have similar terms to the senior notessecured credit facility regarding mandatory prepayment events and to use commercially reasonable efforts to have such registration statement declared effective on or prior to May 4, 2009.  If we fail to timely file the registration statement or it is not timely declared effective, then we will pay special interest on the senior notes equal to 0.25% on the outstanding principal amount of the notes with respect to the first ninety days following the registration default event, which will increase by an additional 0.25% with respect to each subsequent ninety day period until all registration defaults have been cured, up to a maximum of 1%.restrictive covenants and contain no financial covenants.

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, we are in compliance with all of the covenants contained in ourthe above described loan agreements.

In connection with ourthe credit facilities discussed above, we capitalized deferred financing costs of  $439,000, $27.1$340,000, $33.2 million and $477,000 for the three monthsyear ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and the periods August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, respectively, primarily consisting of facility, legal and advisory fees.  We are amortizing these costs over the terms of the related facilities.  For the three monthsyear ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009 and the periods August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007, we amortized $1.2$4.8 million, $267,000$3.5 million and $217,000, respectively, to interest expense.

Interest paid was $11.9$52.7 million for the three monthsyear ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008, $44,0002009, $53.9 million for the period August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 2007, and2008, $57,000 for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $674,000 for the year ended June 30, 2007.

           10.Accrued interest of $14.0 million and $4.5 million was included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The fair value of our debt instruments are summarized as follows:

  June 30, 2009 
  Carrying  Estimated 
  Amount  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
       
Senior secured B-1 term loan $393,000  $314,400 
Senior secured B-2 term loan  122,813   84,741 
Senior unsecured notes  225,000   173,250 
Senior subordinated unsecured term loan  147,450   88,470 
Other  1,085   1,085 
Total debt $889,348  $661,946 

The carrying value of debt of $878.8 million as of June 30, 2008 had a fair value of $804.2 million.

F-29

The estimated fair values of each of our debt instruments are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. Fair value estimates related to our debt instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information.  These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgments and therefore cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

12.           Stockholder’s Equity

Stock Repurchase Program

During fiscal 2005, our then Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program.  During fiscal 2007, a total of 1,753,838 shares were repurchased for $17.2 million and retired.

Share Based Compensation
 
Stock Options

F-68
All of our Predecessor Entity stock option plans were terminated on August 15, 2007. The Merger agreement provided that all stock options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment equal to the number of shares of our common stock underlying the options multiplied by that amount, if any, by which $14.50 exceeded the exercise price, without interest and less any withholding taxes.  On August 15, 2007 we paid $43.9 million to option holders to cancel all options outstanding in connection with the Merger.

Under our stock option plans that were in effect until August 15, 2007, the exercise period for all stock options did not exceed ten years from the date of grant.  Stock option grants to individuals generally became exercisable in substantially equal tranches over a service period of up to five years and the exercise price was equal to the market value of the common stock at the grant date for all plans.  We have elected to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Our stock option plans allowed employees to use shares received from the exercise of options only to satisfy the minimum tax withholding requirements.  During the fiscal year 2007 no payroll taxes on stock option exercises were withheld from employees in shares of the Company’s common stock.  In fiscal 2007, one employee tendered 55,951 previously owned common shares upon the exercise of options to pay for the exercise price.

The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted for the year ended June 30, 2007 was $7.96.  The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the year ended June 30, 2007 was $9.0 million.

The fair value of each share option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table.  Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our shares using daily price observations over a period consistent with the expected life.  Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.

We used the Securities and Exchange Commission’s safe harbor guidance in SAB 107 (the average of the vesting period and the option term) to estimate the expected life of options granted during fiscal 2007.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods similar to the expected life of the option.

F-30

Year Ended June 30,
2007
Weighted average expected stock price volatility66%
Weighted average expected option life5.5 years
Average risk free interest rate4.6%
Average dividend yield-
Discount for post-vesting restrictionsN/A
Member Interests

On August 15, 2007 certain members of our management were granted Class B member interests in a limited liability company (parent LLC) that is the ultimate parent of the Company, and which owns all of the common stock of the Parent. The parent LLC is a holding company with no operations or employees of its own. The parent LLC has two classes of membership interests.interests, Class A and Class B. Our non-management equity investors, or their affiliates, and Company employees that made equity investments to partially fund the Merger andare Class A members.  In addition, the former shareholders of VI Tech (see Note 4) are also Class A members.  Class B members consist of certain Company employees. Pursuant to the terms of the limited liability company operating agreement governing the parent LLC, the holders of Class B member interests are entitled to receive a percentage of all distributions, if any, made by the parent LLC after (x) the holders of the Class A membersmember interests in the parent LLC have received a return of their invested capital, plus a 12% per annum internal rate of return (compounded annually) on their invested capital and (y) certain members of our management that received Class A interests for their capital contributions have received a special distribution in the aggregate amount of $3.2 million, together with a 12% per annum internal rate of return (compounded annually). The Class B member interests are non-transferable and vest ratably over five years, with any unvested interests reverting to the holders of Class A interests in the event they are forfeited or repurchased.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” and FSP FAS No. 123(R)-4, “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event”, the Class B members interests are equity classified awards and, therefore, the fair value of the Class B members’ interests at the grant date is being recorded as compensation expense over the respective five year vesting periods, which amounted to $2.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 and $1.7 million for the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008. In addition, since the Class A employee members that made equity investments to partially fund the Merger paid less than fair value for their Class A member interests, as only they are entitled to the $3.2 million special distribution and there is no vesting associated with the special distribution, the present value of the discount from fair value of $1.4 million was recorded by the Company as compensation expense on August 15, 2007.  The accretion of $252,000 and $193,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, respectively, was recorded as interest expense.

Compensation expense attributable to share based compensation was $489,000$2.0 million ($308,0001.2 million after tax) for the three monthsyear ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008, $1.72009, $3.1 million ($1.02.0 million after tax) for the period August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 2007 and2008, $214,000 ($135,000 after tax) for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $4.1 million ($2.6 million after tax) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.

F-31

A summary of the changes to outstanding stock options from July 1, 2007 to August 15, 2007 is presented below:

    Weighted 
    Average 
    Exercise 
 Shares  Price  Shares  Price 
 (In thousands)     (In thousands)    
            
Outstanding at June 30, 2007  13,003  $12.37   13,003  $12.37 
Granted  -   -   -   - 
Forfeited  (27)  19.30   (27)  19.30 
Expired  -   -   -   - 
Exercised  (51)  11.39   (51)  11.39 
Cancelled  (3,825)  18.74   (3,825)  18.74 
Paid out on Merger  (9,100)  9.68   (9,100)  9.68 
Outstanding at August 15, 2007  -       -     


As no stock options were granted subsequent tosince August 15, 2007, there are also no stock options outstanding at SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009.

Cash received from stock option exercises was $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, $0 for the period August 15, 2007 to September 30, 2007 and $583,000 for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $14.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.  The tax benefit received from stock option exercises was $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, $16.1 million for the period August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 2007 and2008, $41,000 for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $3.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.

F-69

11.13.           Comprehensive Income
 
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Net income (loss) $(76,688) $(105,425) $(16,916) $4,926 
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate                
swap contracts, net of tax provision                
(benefit) of $(6,849), $829, $0 and $3  (11,013)  1,411   -   5 
Valuation allowance against                
non-current marketable securities  (2,268)  -   -   - 
Minimum pension liability adjustment                
net of tax of $(363), $(4), $0 and $(160)  (493)  (6)  -   (267)
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (41,333)  (998)  (497)  15,168 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $(131,795) $(105,018) $(17,413) $19,832 

          
  Three Months Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to 
  September 30, 2008  September 30, 2007  August 14, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
          
Net income (loss) $(6,897) $(50,498) $(16,916)
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate            
   swap agreements, net of tax provision            
   (benefit) of ($1.1 million), $0, and $0  (1,831)  -   - 
Valuation allowance against            
   non-current marketable securities, net            
   of tax benefit of $443,000  (755)  -   - 
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (21,781)  4,315   (497)
Total comprehensive income (loss) $(31,264) $(46,183) $(17,413)
F-32
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:

  Unrealized  Valuation          
  Gain (Loss)  Allowance Against  Minimum       
  on Interest  Non-Current  Pension  Foreign    
  Rate Swap  Marketable  Liability  Currency    
  Agreements  Securities  Adjustment  Translation  Total 
  (net of tax)  (net of tax)  (net of tax)  Adjustment  (net of tax) 
        (In thousands)       
Balance, June 30, 2008 $1,411  $-  $(6) $(998) $407 
Three months' activity  (1,831)  (755)  -   (21,781)  (24,367)
Balance, September 30, 2008 $(420) $(755) $(6) $(22,779) $(23,960)
  Unrealized             
  Gain (Loss)  Valuation  Minimum       
  on Interest  Allowance Against  Pension  Foreign    
  Rate Swap  Non-Current  Liability  Currency    
  Contracts  Marketable  Adjustment  Translation  Total 
  (net of tax)  Securities  (net of tax)  Adjustment  (net of tax) 
  (In thousands) 
                
Balance, June 30, 2006 $(12) $-  $(4,180) $17,660  $13,468 
Annual change  5   -   (267)  15,168   14,906 
Adjustment related to                    
initial adoption of SFAS 158  -   -   (728)  -   (728)
Balance, June 30, 2007  (7)  -   (5,175)  32,828   27,646 
Predecessor period  -   -   -   (497)  (497)
Adjustments for the effect                    
of the Merger  7   -   5,175   (32,331)  (27,149)
   -   -   -   -   - 
Successor period  1,411   -   (6)  (998)  407 
Balance, June 30, 2008  1,411   -   (6)  (998)  407 
Annual change  (11,013)  (2,268)  (493)  (41,333)  (55,107)
Balance, June 30, 2009 $(9,602) $(2,268) $(499) $(42,331) $(54,700)

The foreign currency translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to indefinite investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.  The valuation allowance for non-current marketable securities is not adjusted for income taxes as it would create a capital loss carryforward upon realization for which we would record a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset.

14.Income Taxes

The amount of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes attributable to domestic and foreign operations are as follows:

  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Domestic $(110,168) $(134,861) $(10,199) $41,710 
                 
Foreign  18,148   (4,670)  (11,040)  (7,981)
  $(92,020) $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729 

 
F-70F-33
 
The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:

  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Current:            
Federal $49  $2,024  $(12,245) $28,800 
State and local  217   -   -   2,973 
Foreign  3,998   (121)  130   346 
   4,264   1,903   (12,115)  32,119 
                 
Deferred:                
Federal  (18,986)  (40,355)  9,503   (4,356)
State and local  2,882   (1,783)  (1,256)  (48)
Foreign  (3,492)  1,308   (2,963)  (2,780)
   (19,596)  (40,830)  5,284   (7,184)
  $(15,332) $(38,927) $(6,831) $24,935 

The provision for income taxes varies from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes as a result of the following:
 
12.
  
Fiscal Year
Ended
  
August 15, 2007
to
  July 1, 2007 to  
Fiscal Year
Ended
 
  June 30, 2009  June 30 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
  (In thousands) 
             
Tax at federal statutory rate $(32,207) $(48,836) $(7,434) $11,805 
                 
Non-deductible acquired in-process research                
and development charge  665   8,744   -   - 
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries  8,138   -   -   - 
Foreign tax rate differential  (1,547)   (334)   664   (504) 
Foreign tax credits  (6,766)  -   -   - 
Increase in valuation allowance  6,190   5,420   237   2,772 
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit  2,735   (1,783)  (1,256)  1,951 
Impairment of goodwill  11,088   -   -   - 
Domestic manufacturing credit  -   (210)  -   (550)
Non-deductible merger expenses  403   5,861   1,111   10,704 
Research and development credit and deduction  (3,182)  (2,148)  (53)  (721)
Settlement of and change in tax contingencies  734   (3,416)  -   1,000 
Other, net  (1,583)  (2,225)  (100)  (1,522)
  $(15,332) $(38,927) $(6,831) $24,935 
F-34
The tax effects of temporary differences which give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of:

  June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  Successor  Successor 
  (In thousands) 
       
Accounts receivable $203  $250 
Inventories  20,926   17,191 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  14,625   20,652 
Other long-term liabilities  12,660   3,440 
Capital loss carryforwards  -   11,145 
Tax loss carryforwards  15,656   10,396 
Tax credit carryforwards  7,590   - 
Gross deferred tax assets  71,660   63,074 
Less:  valuation allowance  (17,300)  (23,131)
Net deferred tax assets  54,360   39,943 
Property, plant and equipment  (8,235)  (8,249)
Non-distributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries  (8,138)  - 
Intangible assets  (145,871)  (164,112)
Gross deferred tax liabilities  (162,244)  (172,361)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $(107,884) $(132,418)

Deferred tax assets have resulted primarily from our future deductible temporary differences and net operating loss, tax credit and capital loss carryforwards.  In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets depends upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income to allow for the utilization of its deductible temporary differences and loss and credit carryforwards.  If such estimates and related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in our consolidated statements of operations.  Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets and the need for additional valuation allowances quarterly. At this time, based on current facts and circumstances, management believes that it is more likely than not that we will realize benefit for our gross deferred tax assets, except those deferred tax assets against which a valuation allowance has been recorded.

Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been provided on undistributed foreign earnings through June 30, 2008 since we expect that substantially all of these earnings will be permanently reinvested in foreign operations.  Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries.

Deferred U.S. income taxes have been provided on undistributed foreign earnings for the year ended June 30, 2009 since we expect that substantially all of these earnings will be distributed to the US. During the year ended June 30, 2009, we repatriated $6.8 million of foreign earnings to fund interest payments required by our credit agreements.  Such repatriations will continue for the foreseeable future.  As such, effective in fiscal 2009, we provide U.S. income taxes on foreign income in the year earned.

In the year ended June 30, 2009 we utilized capital loss carryforwards of $7.3 million and had capital loss carryforwards of $14.0 million that expired unused.

F-35
As of June 30, 2009, we have domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $17.5 million which expire in fiscal 2029 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $4.3 million in the U.K., $15.6 million in France and $7.3 million in China which have no expiration.  We have state net operating loss carryforwards that create an available net tax benefit of $2.1 million. We have provided a valuation allowance against all net operating loss carryforwards in France and China, $3.0 million net operating loss carryforwards in the U.K., $287,000 of state net tax benefits, $6.8 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards and certain other deferred tax assets that are not deemed realizable.

As of June 30, 2009, we have U.S. research and development tax credit carryforwards of $765,000 which have been claimed and expire in fiscal 2029 and U.S. foreign tax credits of $1.1 million which have been claimed and expire in fiscal 2019. The Company also has foreign tax credits of $5.6 million that relate to foreign source income upon which U.S. taxes have been provided, but are not yet subject to current U.S. income taxes.  We have provided a valuation allowance against all claimed and unclaimed foreign tax credits.

We made income tax payments of $3.6 million, $7.8 million, $191,000 and $28.8 million and received refunds of $2.3 million, $27.1 million, $0 and $284,000 during the year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.  As a result of the Merger and the payments to option holders, we had a taxable loss for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 of $78.9 million.  This net operating loss was carried back to fiscal years 2007 and 2006, resulting in a $27.1 million Federal tax refund, which we received in May 2008.

On July 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109.”  This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”  FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return.  FIN 48 provides that unrecognized tax benefits should be based on the facts, circumstances and information available at each balance sheet date and that subsequent changes in judgment should be based on new facts and circumstances and any resulting change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefit should be accounted for in the interim period in which the change occurs.  The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The aggregate amount of unrecognized tax benefits included in liabilities was as follows:

  Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
       
Balance at beginning of year $1,005  $4,421 
Gross increase related to tax positions taken prior to fiscal year  817   495 
Gross decrease related to tax positions taken prior to fiscal year  (83)  (58)
Reduction as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations  -   (3,853)
Balance at end of year $1,739  $1,005 

Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities recognized in accordance with the provisions of FIN 48 are included in income tax expense, consistent with our historical policy and amounted to $401,000, $124,000 and $0 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the periods from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to July 14, 2007, respectively.  At June 30, 2009 and 2008 accrued interest on uncertain tax positions was $474,000 and $188,000, respectively, net of the Federal benefit.

F-36

In September 2007, we settled a New York State income tax audit for the fiscal years 2002 through 2004. The decrease in the liability of $58,000 in fiscal 2008 was for the reversal of a liability previously recognized.

In April 2009, we settled a New York State income tax audit for the fiscal years 2005 and 2006 with no payment of taxes. The decrease in liability of $83,000 in fiscal 2009 was for a reversal of a liability previously recognized.

Currently, we are being audited by the Internal Revenue Service for fiscal years 2006 and 2007 and the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007; and the state of Kansas for the fiscal years 2004 through 2007. Management does not believe that the resolution of the ongoing income tax examinations described above will have a material adverse impact on our financial position.  Changes in the liabilities for uncertain tax positions will be recognized in the interim period in which the positions are effectively settled or there is a change in factual circumstances. The statute of limitations for our fiscal year 2005 Federal and the majority of our State tax returns has expired.

We recorded increases of $0, $0, $12.5 million and $2.9 million to additional paid-in capital during the year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the year ended June 30, 2007, respectively, in connection with the excess of the realized tax benefit related to compensation deductions on the exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares over the deferred tax asset attributable to stock compensation costs for such awards.

15.     Employment Contracts

We have employment agreements with our officers and certain other key employees for varying periods through 2014 with annual remuneration ranging from $80,000 to $555,000, plus cost of living adjustments and, in some cases, additional compensation based upon earnings of the Company.  Future aggregate minimum payments under these contracts are $9.7 million.  Certain of the contracts provide for a three-year consulting period at the expiration of the employment term at two-thirds of salary.  In addition, certain of these officers have the option to terminate their employment agreements upon a change in control of the Company, as defined, and receive lump sum payments equal to the salary and bonus, if any, for the remainder of the term.

16.     Employee Benefit Plans

401(k) and Profit Sharing Plans

All employees of the Company and certain subsidiaries who are not members of a collective bargaining agreement are eligible to participate in a Company sponsored 401(k) plan. Each participant has the option to contribute a portion of his or her compensation and through June 30, 2009 (when the discretionary match was suspended), to receive a discretionary employer matching contribution.  Furthermore, employees of one subsidiary are eligible to participate in a qualified profit sharing plan and receive an allocation of a discretionary share of the subsidiary’s profits.  For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively, aggregate expenses related to these 401(k) and profit sharing plans were $5.3 million, $4.7 million, $413,000 and $4.7 million, respectively.

F-37

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Merger constituted a change in control of the Company that accelerated the vesting of benefits under our SERP in the event of termination of employment of its three remaining active participants on or prior to August 15, 2008.  Additionally, soon after the Merger, the SERP was amended to provide that no additional benefits are earned after August 31, 2007.  Accordingly, if a participant’s employment was terminated prior to August 15, 2008, the participant would have received a lump sum payment of the present value of the benefits at retirement age based on average pay through August 31, 2007.  The additional benefits payable under the SERP resulting from the change of control of $16.6 million was recorded as compensation expense (included in sale transaction expenses) in August 2007 (Successor period).

The Company entered into amended employment agreements with certain participants in the SERP which, among other terms, provided that if such participants remain employed beyond August 15, 2008, which they have, specified payments, approximating the benefits earned under the SERP, plus 6% interest per annum from August 15, 2007, would be payable to those participants in full satisfaction of the benefits payable under the SERP, payable the earlier of December 31, 2008 to January 5, 2009, or upon specified events, including an additional change of control of the Company or termination.  The aggregate liability to these participants under the SERP, including the related interest, was $19.9 million (of which $19.1 million was included in Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities at June 30, 2008) and was paid in December 2008 and January 2009.  In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, we paid $10.3 million of benefits to participants in the SERP.

As of June 30, 2009, the SERP is unfunded, however, there are funds (primarily the cash surrender value of life insurance policies that specify the SERP as the beneficiary) being held in a rabbi trust for the one remaining individual in the SERP, an officer who retired in 2005.  Those assets (which are included in other assets) totaled $8.6 million and $8.0 million at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are not considered in the fair value of plan assets.  An actuarially determined liability of $6.7 million for the one remaining SERP participant is recorded as of June 30, 2009, of which $628,000 and $6.1 million is included in Accrued Expenses and Defined Benefit Plan Obligations, respectively.  Payments to the retired officer of $628,000, $523,000, $105,000 and $674,000 were made in the fiscal year 2009, the period August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year 2007, respectively.  We are required to make payments of $628,000 in each fiscal year pursuant to the SERP to this retired officer through December 31, 2015 or upon death, whichever is later.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and the period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008, we recorded $544,000 and $858,000, respectively, of interest expense incurred on the SERP liabilities and $444,000 and $343,000 of pension expense, included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations, for an increase in the SERP liability.

Effective June 30, 2007, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” which requires employers to recognize in their balance sheets the overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit postretirement plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation (the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement plans).  Employers must recognize the change in the funded status of the plan in the year in which the change occurs through accumulated other comprehensive income. SFAS No. 158 also requires plan assets and obligations to be measured as of the employer’s balance sheet date.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158, changes in the funded status of our plans were not immediately recognized, rather they were deferred and recognized ratably over future periods.  Upon adoption of SFAS No. 158, we recognized the amounts of prior changes in the funded status of our SERP through accumulated other comprehensive income.

F-38

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

  Year Ended June 30, 
  2007 
  (In thousands) 
    
Service cost $151 
Interest cost  1,051 
Expected return on plan assets  - 
Amortization of net transition (asset) obligation  38 
Recognized actuarial loss  537 
Net periodic benefit cost $1,777 

Additional Information

  Year Ended June 30, 
  2007 
  (In thousands) 
    
Increase (decrease) in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income $394 

Assumptions

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations

  SERP 
  Years Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007 
          
Discount rate  5.00%  5.00%  6.25%
Rate of compensation increase  *   *   3.00%
           Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost

  SERP 
  Years Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007 
          
Discount rate  5.00%  5.00%  6.25%
Expected long-term return on plan assets  N/A   N/A   N/A 
Rate of compensation increase  *   *   3.00%

*Not applicable as the one participant in the SERP whose liability is actuarially determined at June 30, 2009 and 2008 is an inactive retired employee.

Plan Assets

As of June 30, 2009 and 2008 the SERP is unfunded.

F-39
17.     Legal Matters

In March 2005, we sold the net assets of our shock and vibration control device manufacturing business (“VMC”).  Under the terms of the sale agreements, we retained certain liabilities relating to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the premises occupied by VMC as of the date of sale and recorded a liability for the estimated remediation costs.  The accrued environmental liability at June 30, 2009 is $1.3 million, of which $322,000 is expected to be paid within one year.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we became aware that certain RadHard bidirectional multipurpose transceivers sold by us since 1999 may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”).ITAR. Accordingly, we filed a Voluntary Disclosure with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State, describing the details of the possible inadvertent misclassification. Simultaneously, we fliedfiled a Commodity Jurisdiction request providing detailed information and data supporting our contention that the product is not subject to ITAR and requestedrequesting a determination that such product is not ITAR controlled. By letter datedOn November 15, 2007, we were informed that the U.S. Department of State had determined in response to our Commodity Jurisdiction request, that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with ITAR. We requested reconsideration of this determination. On February 7, 2008, we filed an addendum to the above referenced Voluntary Disclosure advising the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls that other products sold by us, similar in nature to the transceiver described above, may also be subject to the ITAR. The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls agreed to extend theour time for us to file such addendum to the Voluntary Disclosure until therea decision was a decisionrendered with respect to our request for reconsideration of the determination in connection with the above-referenced Commodity Jurisdiction request. On August 5, 2008, we received a letter from the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (“DTCC”) requesting that we provide documentation and/or information relating to our ITAR compliance initiatives after November 15, 2007 as well as the results of any product reviews conducted by us, and indicating that a civil penalty against us could be warranted in connection with this matter following the review of such materials. We have complied withprovided all of the materials and documentation requested by the DTCC.  Our request by DTCC and have provided the detailed information requested.  In August 2008, we received the determinationfor reconsideration was denied by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls with respect to the request for reconsideration of the Commodity Jurisdiction determination.  The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls denied our request for reconsideration andon August 19, 2008 which determined that the product is subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of State in accordance with the ITAR. Accordingly, on September 18, 2008, we filed an addendum to our Voluntary Disclosure identifying other products that may have been subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State in accordance with the ITAR but were inadvertently misclassified.  At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us or the materiality of any outcome.

During May 2008, we became further aware that a certain product sold by our KDI subsidiary may have inadvertently been misclassified as notThe Company is involved in various other ITAR controlled. On August 5, 2008, we filed a Voluntary Disclosurerelated matters, including some recently identified with the Directorateprior practices of Defense Trade Controls,a recently acquired business, which have been disclosed, or may warrant disclosure, with the U.S. Department of State, describingState.  Although we are in the inadvertent misclassificationprocess of this product.addressing these matters, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to adequately correct all possible ITAR violations. At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be asserted against us related to these other ITAR matters, or the materiality of any outcome.

An amended class action complaint was filed against us and ourthe Predecessor Entity’s board of directors on June 20, 2007 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County. The complaint alleges that ourthe board breached its fiduciary duties to our stockholders (i) by issuing a preliminary proxy statement on June 5, 2007 that was issued in connection with seeking stockholder approval of the Merger and (ii) in approving certain amendments, that were allegedly beyond the scope of our corporate powerpowers, to our Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanSERP and the employment agreements of defendants Harvey R. Blau, our then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Leonard Borow, our then President and Chief Operating Officer and currently, the Successor Entity’s President and Chief Executive Officer. The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief with respect to the first cause of action, seeking to enjoin the July 26, 2007 special meeting of our stockholders on the grounds that we and our board of directors provided inadequate disclosures, and the recovery of money damages with respect to the second cause of action. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their motion for preliminary injunctive relief. On July 9, 2007, we and our board of directors filedWe have reached a motion to dismiss the amended class action complaint and that motion is currently pending. The July 26, 2007 stockholders meeting went forward and our stockholders approved the Merger.  On August 15, 2007, the acquisition of the Company was completed. We are currently in settlement discussions with the plaintiffs and have accrued an insignificant liability for the settlement.

F-40
We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.


13.      Commitment18.      Other Commitments and Contingencies

Our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) is unfunded.  Excluding
Operating Leases

Several of our operating facilities and certain machinery and equipment are leased under agreements expiring through 2020.  The leases for machinery and equipment generally contain purchase options at the monthlythen fair value of the related leased assets at the end of their lease term.

Future minimum payments due one retired participant through at least December 31, 2015, weunder operating leases as of June 30, 2009 are required to make $18.3as follows for the fiscal years:
  (In thousands) 
2010 $6,864 
2011  5,390 
2012  3,724 
2013  2,205 
2014  1,196 
Thereafter  1,114 
Future minimum lease payments $20,493 

Rental expense was $7.4 million, of payments, plus 6% interest per annum from$7.0 million, $1.1 million, and $9.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 in full satisfaction ofto June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the benefits payable underfiscal year ended June 30, 2007, respectively.  Sub-lease rental income was $84,000, $486,000, $145,000, and $1.2 million for the SERPfiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the periods August 15, 2007 to all remaining participantsJune 30, 2008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the earlier of December 31, 2008 to January 5, 2009 or upon specified events, including an additional change of control of the Company or termination.  The aggregate accrued liability to those participants, including the related interest, was $19.4 million at Septemberfiscal year ended June 30, 2008.2007, respectively.

F-71
14.19.      Business Segments

Our business segments and major products included in each segment, are as follows:

Microelectronic Solutions (“AMS”)

 ·Microelectronic Components, Sub-assemblies and Modules
 ·Integrated Circuits
 ·Motion Control Systems

Test Solutions (“ATS”)

 ·Instrument Products and Test Systems

We are a manufacturer of advanced technology systems and components for commercial industry, government and defense contractors. Approximately 32.6%37% of our sales for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008, 27.8% of our sales2009, 29% for the period August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 2007 and2008, 21% for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and 30% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 were to agencies of the United States government or to prime defense contractors or subcontractors of the United States government. No one customer constituted more than 10% of sales during any of the periods presented. Inter-segment sales were not material and have been eliminated from the tables below.

F-41
The majority of our operations are located in the United States; however, we also have operations in Europe and Asia, with our most significant international operations in the United Kingdom.U.K. Net sales from facilities located in the United KingdomU.K. were approximately $34.4$129.1 million for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008, $28.22009, $167.7 million for the period August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 2007 and2008, $11.7 million for the period July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and $166.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. Total assets of the United Kingdom operations were $200.3$188.2 million as of June 30, 2009 and $237.5 million as of September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively.2008.

Revenues,Net sales, based on the customers’ locations, attributed to the United States and other regions are as follows:

    Period  Period  Fiscal Year        Fiscal Year 
 Three Months Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended  August 15, 2007 to  July 1, 2007 to  Ended 
 September 30, 2008  September 30, 2007  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2009  June 30, 2008  August 14, 2007  June 30, 2007 
 Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Successor  Successor  Predecessor  Predecessor 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                     
United States of America $75,015  $56,227  $21,183  $350,844  $329,226  $21,183  $346,235 
Europe and Middle East  37,121   23,787   10,357   140,458   141,422   10,357   155,905 
Asia and Australia  26,886   20,622   6,242   98,621   123,887   6,242   84,779 
Other regions  1,823   1,379   439   9,413   10,456   439   6,227 
 $140,845  $102,015  $38,221  $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 


F-72F-42
 
Selected financial data by segment is as follows:

  Three Months Ended  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007 
  September 30,  to September 30,  to August 14, 
  2008  2007  2007 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Net sales:         
   Microelectronic solutions ("AMS") $67,580  $48,396  $19,017 
   Test solutions ("ATS")  73,265   53,619   19,204 
   Net sales $140,845  $102,015  $38,221 
             
Segment adjusted operating income:            
    - AMS $14,613  $15,233  $24 
    - ATS  9,630   10,568   (7,582)
    - General corporate expense  (2,696)  (480)  (2,347)
Adjusted operating income (loss)  21,547   25,321   (9,905)
             
Amortization of acquired intangibles            
   - AMS  (10,677)  (6,257)  (279)
   - ATS  (7,291)  (4,212)  (1,413)
Share based compensation            
   - AMS  -   -   (83)
   - ATS  -   -   95 
   - Corporate  (489)  (1,657)  (226)
Restructuring charges            
   - AMS  -   -   - 
   - ATS  (402)  (31)  (3,778)
One-time lease termination costs            
   - ATS  -   -   (576)
Merger related expenses - Corporate  (634)  (2,182)  (1,319)
Acquired in-process R&D costs            
   - AMS  -   (15,700)  - 
   - ATS  -   (8,640)  - 
Current period impact of acquisition related adjustments:            
   Inventory - AMS  -   (7,160)  (57)
   Inventory - ATS  -   (5,240)  - 
   Depreciation - AMS  (286)  (146)  - 
   Depreciation - ATS  (738)  (412)  - 
   Depreciation - Corporate  (55)  (27)  - 
   Deferred revenue - ATS  (97)  (676)  - 
Sale transaction expenses  -   (30,295)  (3,717)
Operating income (loss) (GAAP)  878   (57,314)  (21,258)
             
Interest expense  (21,215)  (11,136)  (275)
Other income (expense), net  3,086   (255)  294 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $(17,251) $(68,705) $(21,239)

  Fiscal Year  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Fiscal Year 
  Ended June 30,  to June 30,  to August 14,  Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  2007 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Net sales:            
Microelectronic solutions ("AMS") $287,517  $283,695  $19,017  $266,515 
Test solutions ("ATS")  311,819   321,296   19,204   326,631 
Net sales $599,336  $604,991  $38,221  $593,146 
                 
Segment adjusted operating income:                
- AMS $63,368  $74,802  $24  $63,908 
- ATS  50,141   54,216   (7,582)  38,582 
General corporate expense  (11,377)  (8,176)  (2,347)  (17,727)
Adjusted operating income (loss)  102,132   120,842   (9,905)  84,763 
                 
Amortization of acquired intangibles                
- AMS  (36,635)  (44,085)  (279)  (1,911)
- ATS  (26,327)  (28,991)  (1,413)  (11,095)
Share based compensation                
- AMS  -   -   (83)  (965)
- ATS  -   -   95   (958)
- Corporate  (1,955)  (3,123)  (226)  (2,161)
Restructuring charges                
- AMS  -   (414)  -   - 
- ATS  (4,102)  (6,581)  (3,778)  (2,840)
One-time lease termination costs                
- ATS  -   -   (576)  - 
Merger related expenses - Corporate  (4,283)  (4,092)  (1,319)  - 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles                
- AMS  (41,225)  -   -   - 
- ATS  -   -   -     
Acquired in-process R&D costs              - 
- AMS  (1,665)  (16,335)  -   - 
- ATS  -   (8,640)  -   - 
Current period impact of acquisition related adjustments:                
Inventory - AMS  -   (23,817)  (57)  - 
Inventory - ATS  (668)  (15,151)  -   - 
Depreciation - AMS  (1,143)  (1,025)  -   - 
Depreciation - ATS  (2,702)  (2,882)  -   - 
Depreciation - Corporate  (220)  (193)  -   - 
Deferred revenue - ATS  (416)  (2,510)  -   - 
Company sale transaction expenses  -   (32,493)  (3,717)  (30,584)
Operating income (loss) (GAAP)  (19,209)  (69,490)  (21,258)  34,249 
                 
Interest expense  (83,823)  (74,658)  (275)  (672)
Other income (expense), net  11,012   4,617   294   152 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $(92,020) $(139,531) $(21,239) $33,729 
F-43
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2009  2008 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Total assets:      
- AMS $689,487  $754,451 
- ATS  566,120   605,120 
- Corporate  105,990   119,428 
- Assets of discontinued operations  -   - 
Total assets: $1,361,597  $1,478,999 
  Fiscal Year  August 15, 2007  July 1, 2007  Fiscal Year 
  Ended June 30,  to June 30,  to August 14,  Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  2007 
  Successor Entity  Successor Entity  Predecessor Entity  Predecessor Entity 
  (In thousands) 
Capital expenditures:            
- AMS $6,792  $7,087  $338  $9,942 
- ATS  11,914   5,950   501   7,155 
- Corporate  11   142   249   1,330 
Total capital expenditures $18,717  $13,179  $1,088  $18,427 
                 
Depreciation and amortization expense:                
- AMS  45,471   51,419   1,137   8,675 
- ATS  38,257   41,060   2,509   21,258 
- Corporate  698   553   16   209 
Total depreciation and amortization expense $84,426  $93,032  $3,662  $30,142 
Management evaluatedevaluates the operating results of the two segments based upon pre-tax operating income, before costs related to restructuring, lease termination charges, amortization of acquired intangibles, share-based compensation, acquired in-process research and development costs, Company Sale Transaction expenses, merger related expenses and the impact of any acquisition related adjustments.

F-73
15.20.        Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Financial Information

The following supplemental condensed consolidating financial information sets forth, on an unconsolidated basis, the balance sheets at SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and June 30, 2008 and the statements of operations and cash flows for the three monthsfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008 and2009, the periods from August 15, 2007 to SeptemberJune 30, 20072008 and July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 for Aeroflex Incorporated (the “Parent Company”), and for the Guarantor Subsidiaries and, on a combined basis, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.  The supplemental condensed consolidating financial information reflects for all fiscal periods presented, the investments of the Parent Company in the Guarantor Subsidiaries as well as the investments of the Parent Company and the Guarantor Subsidiaries in the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, in all cases using the equity method.  The Parent Company’s purchase price allocation adjustments, including applicable intangible assets, arising from business acquisitions have been pushed down to the applicable subsidiary columns (see Notes 3 and 4).

F-44

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three MonthsYear Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009
(In thousands)

    Subsidiary  Subsidiary           Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
 Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                              
Net sales $-  $95,641  $46,807  $(1,603) $140,845  $-  $431,581  $175,317  $(7,562) $599,336 
Cost of sales  -   50,454   24,686   (1,654)  73,486   -   227,200   94,195   (7,164)  314,231 
Gross profit  -   45,187   22,121   51   67,359   -   204,381   81,122   (398)  285,105 
Selling, general and administrative costs  3,873   17,985   9,626   -   31,484   17,835   73,384   37,137   -   128,356 
Research and development costs  -   11,167   5,862   -   17,029   -   46,272   23,834   -   70,106 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   15,313   2,655   -   17,968   -   53,862   9,100   -   62,962 
Acquired in-process R&D costs  -   -   1,665   -   1,665 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  -   41,225   -   -   41,225 
Operating income (loss)  (3,873)  722   3,978   51   878   (17,835)  (10,362)  9,386   (398)  (19,209)
                                        
Other income (expense):                                        
Interest expense  (21,183)  (22)  (10)  -   (21,215)  (83,724)  (88)  (11)  -   (83,823)
Other income (expense), net  63   242   2,781   -   3,086   (319)  907   10,424   -   11,012 
Intercompany charges  22,186   (21,573)  (613)  -   -   80,026   (77,524)  (2,502)  -   - 
Income (loss) before income taxes  (2,807)  (20,631)  6,136   51   (17,251)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  (21,852)  (87,067)  17,297   (398)  (92,020)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (1,047)  (7,843)  1,196   (2,660)  (10,354)  (1,570)  (13,307)  (455)�� -   (15,332)
Equity in income(loss) of subsidiaries  (5,137)  5,228   -   (91)  - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  (20,282)  (73,760)  17,752   (398)  (76,688)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (56,406)  18,605   -   37,801   - 
Net income (loss) $(6,897) $(7,560) $4,940  $2,620  $(6,897) $(76,688) $(55,155) $17,752  $37,403  $(76,688)

 
F-74F-45
 



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to September 30, 2007
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

    Subsidiary  Subsidiary           Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
 Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                              
Net sales $-  $72,458  $31,015  $(1,458) $102,015  $-  $429,372  $180,832  $(5,213) $604,991 
Cost of sales  -   46,288   20,077   (1,605)  64,760   -   253,291   104,857   (5,195)  352,953 
Gross profit  -   26,170   10,938   147   37,255  -  176,081  75,975  (18) 252,038 
Selling, general and administrative costs  4,347   9,494   5,143   -   18,984  15,584  66,265  39,237  -  121,086 
Research and development costs  -   6,343   4,137   -   10,480  -  40,097  29,801  -  69,898 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   9,098   1,372   -   10,470  -  63,477  9,599  -  73,076 
Acquired in-process R&D costs  -   21,820   2,520   -   24,340  -  21,820  3,155  -  24,975 
Company sale transaction expenses  30,295   -   -   -   30,295   32,493   -   -   -   32,493 
Operating income (loss)  (34,642)  (20,585)  (2,234)  147   (57,314) (48,077) (15,578) (5,817) (18) (69,490)
                                        
Other income (expense):                                        
Interest expense  (11,124)  (14)  2   -   (11,136) (74,563) (95) -  -  (74,658)
Other income (expense), net  325   (22)  (558)  -   (255) 1,943  147  2,527  -  4,617 
Intercompany charges  5,924   (5,485)  (439)  -   -   81,994   (80,482)  (1,512)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (39,517)  (26,106)  (3,229)  147   (68,705)  (38,703)  (96,008)  (4,802)  (18)  (139,531)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (11,767)  (7,774)  798   (426)  (19,169)  (11,525)  (28,589)  1,187   -   (38,927)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (27,750)  (18,332)  (4,027)  573   (49,536)  (27,178)  (67,419)  (5,989)  (18)  (100,604)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (962)  -   -   (962)  -   (4,821)  -   -   (4,821)
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries  (22,748)  (4,035)  -   26,783   - 
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (78,247)  (5,712)  -   83,959   - 
Net income (loss) $(50,498) $(23,329) $(4,027) $27,356  $(50,498) $(105,425) $(77,952) $(5,989) $83,941  $(105,425)


 
F-75F-46
 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $25,858  $12,809  $(446) $38,221 
Cost of sales  -   15,066   8,074   (279)  22,861 
Gross profit  -   10,792   4,735   (167)  15,360 
Selling, general and administrative costs  3,892   7,571   7,568   -   19,031 
Research and development costs  -   5,526   6,652   -   12,178 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   601   1,091   -   1,692 
Company sale transaction expenses  3,717   -   -   -   3,717 
Operating income (loss)  (7,609)  (2,906)  (10,576)  (167)  (21,258)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (261)  (14)  -   -   (275)
Other income (expense), net  157   27   110   -   294 
Intercompany charges  5,544   (5,109)  (435)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (2,169)  (8,002)  (10,901)  (167)  (21,239)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (853)  (3,145)  (2,833)  -   (6,831)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (1,316)  (4,857)  (8,068)  (167)  (14,408)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (2,508)  -   -   (2,508)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  (15,600)  (7,814)  -   23,414   - 
Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)
F-47

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Period from July 1,Year Ended June 30, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)


     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $25,858  $12,809  $(446) $38,221 
Cost of sales  -   15,066   8,074   (279)  22,861 
   Gross profit  -   10,792   4,735   (167)  15,360 
Selling, general and administrative costs  3,892   7,571   7,568   -   19,031 
Research and development costs  -   5,526   6,652   -   12,178 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   601   1,091   -   1,692 
Company sale transaction expenses  3,717   -   -   -   3,717 
Operating income (loss)  (7,609)  (2,906)  (10,576)  (167)  (21,258)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
   Interest expense  (261)  (14)  -   -   (275)
   Other income (expense), net  157   27   110   -   294 
Intercompany charges  5,544   (5,109)  (435)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (2,169)  (8,002)  (10,901)  (167)  (21,239)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (853)  (3,145)  (2,833)  -   (6,831)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (1,316)  (4,857)  (8,068)  (167)  (14,408)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (2,508)  -   -   (2,508)
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries  (15,600)  (7,814)  -   23,414   - 
Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)


F-76


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2008
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $49,739  $(1,292) $24,619  $-  $73,066 
Accounts receivable, net  -   70,660   39,637   -   110,297 
Inventories  -   97,275   40,152   (450)  136,977 
Deferred income taxes  (2,333)  23,753   5,040   -   26,460 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  4,590   2,697   5,158   -   12,445 
Total current assets  51,996   193,093   114,606   (450)  359,245 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  13,237   63,682   24,430   -   101,349 
Non-current marketable securities  18,755   -   -   -   18,755 
Deferred financing costs  29,435   -   -   -   29,435 
Deferred income taxes  (42)  -   42   -   - 
Other assets  11,792   2,357   992   -   15,141 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   276,704   45,056   -   321,760 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives  -   90,229   29,822   -   120,051 
Goodwill  -   411,426   44,283   484   456,193 
Total assets $125,173  $1,037,491  $259,231  $34  $1,421,929 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $5,250  $320  $-  $-  $5,570 
Accounts payable  740   17,129   14,013   -   31,882 
Deferred revenue, including advance payments  -   7,645   11,352   -   18,997 
Income taxes payable  (605)  (387)  3,089   -   2,097 
Accrued payroll expense  2,303   20,896   2,555       25,754 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  34,555   13,253   10,959   -   58,767 
Total current liabilities  42,243   58,856   41,968   -   143,067 
                     
Long-term debt  874,728   1,085   -   -   875,813 
Deferred income taxes  (14,844)  142,437   18,558   (2,660)  143,491 
Other long-term liabilities  7,545   468   5,613   -   13,626 
Intercompany investment  (250,070)  4,126   245,944   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (886,062)  915,879   (29,817)  -   - 
Total liabilities  (226,460)  1,122,851   282,266   (2,660)  1,175,997 
                     
Stockholder's equity  351,633   (85,360)  (23,035)  2,694   245,932 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $125,173  $1,037,491  $259,231  $34  $1,421,929 
     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
                
Net sales $-  $422,347  $177,586  $(6,787) $593,146 
Cost of sales  -   217,025   98,927   (6,983)  308,969 
Gross profit  -   205,322   78,659   196   284,177 
Selling, general and administrative costs  19,888   71,125   38,608   -   129,621 
Research and development costs  -   42,241   34,476   -   76,717 
Amortization of acquired intangibles  -   4,498   8,508   -   13,006 
Company sale transaction expenses  30,584   -   -   -   30,584 
Operating income (loss)  (50,472)  87,458   (2,933)  196   34,249 
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Interest expense  (534)  (127)  (11)  -   (672)
Other income (expense), net  1,479   205   (1,532)  -   152 
Intercompany charges  45,158   (41,672)  (3,486)  -   - 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  (4,369)  45,864   (7,962)  196   33,729 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (2,882)  30,251   (2,434)  -   24,935 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (1,487)  15,613   (5,528)  196   8,794 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   (3,868)  -   -   (3,868)
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries  6,413   (4,629)  -   (1,784)  - 
Net income (loss) $4,926  $7,116  $(5,528) $(1,588) $4,926 


 
F-77F-48
 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet 
As of June 30, 2009 
(In thousands) 
                
     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $31,221  $(15) $26,542  $-  $57,748 
Accounts receivable, net  -   86,530   43,899   -   130,429 
Inventories  -   103,674   32,827   (898)  135,603 
Deferred income taxes  3,452   25,681   6,031   -   35,164 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,623   2,542   4,773   -   9,938 
Total current assets  37,296   218,412   114,072   (898)  368,882 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  12,720   67,624   20,563   -   100,907 
Non-current marketable securities  17,677   -   -   -   17,677 
Deferred financing costs  25,754   -   -   -   25,754 
Other assets  12,551   2,243   631   -   15,425 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   253,225   39,328   -   292,553 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives, net  -   85,404   26,862   -   112,266 
Goodwill  (10)  388,913   39,230   -   428,133 
Total assets $105,988  $1,015,821  $240,686  $(898) $1,361,597 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $5,250  $340  $-  $-  $5,590 
Accounts payable  285   20,553   15,736   -   36,574 
Advanced payments by customers and deferred revenue  -   17,433   15,985   -   33,418 
Income taxes payable  587   -   4,493   -   5,080 
Accrued payroll expenses  1,600   15,148   2,128   -   18,876 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  25,418   11,079   11,441   -   47,938 
Total current liabilities  33,140   64,553   49,783   -   147,476 
                     
Long-term debt  883,013   745   -   -   883,758 
Deferred income taxes  (11,453)  138,725   15,776   -   143,048 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,079   -   -   -   6,079 
Other long-term liabilities  16,825   1,271   3,380   -   21,476 
Intercompany investment  (268,635)  41,022   227,613   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (880,752)  902,126   (20,891)  (483)  - 
Total liabilities  (221,783)  1,148,442   275,661   (483)  1,201,837 
                     
Stockholder's equity:  327,771   (132,621)  (34,975)  (415)  159,760 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $105,988  $1,015,821  $240,686  $(898) $1,361,597 
F-49


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2008
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

     Subsidiary  Subsidiary       
  Parent  Guarantors  Non-Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $39,285  $(2,379) $17,243  $-  $54,149 
Accounts receivable, net  -   90,343   57,640   -   147,983 
Inventories  -   91,856   43,537   (502)  134,891 
Deferred income taxes  (2,352)  23,539   5,852   -   27,039 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,464   2,616   7,104   -   12,184 
Total current assets  39,397   205,975   131,376   (502)  376,246 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net  13,406   63,964   27,279   -   104,649 
Non-current marketable securities  19,960   -   -   -   19,960 
Deferred financing costs  30,185   -   -   -   30,185 
Other assets  16,480   2,474   (394)  -   18,560 
Intangible assets with definite lives, net  -   297,408   47,458   -   344,866 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives  -   90,229   33,149   -   123,378 
Goodwill  -   435,570   25,101   484   461,155 
Total assets $119,428  $1,095,620  $263,969  $(18) $1,478,999 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Current portion of long-term debt $5,250  $324  $-  $-  $5,574 
Accounts payable  554   19,882   18,946   -   39,382 
Deferred revenue, including advance payments  -   8,621   18,523   -   27,144 
Income taxes payable  409   -   1,527   -   1,936 
Accrued payroll expense  2,106   18,200   4,219   -   24,525 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  31,205   12,272   13,353   -   56,830 
Total current liabilities  39,524   59,299   56,568   -   155,391 
                     
Long-term debt  872,152   1,085   -   -   873,237 
Deferred income taxes  (12,254)  150,400   21,311   -   159,457 
Defined benefit plan obligations  6,263   -   -   -   6,263 
Other long-term liabilities  1,368   487   6,148   -   8,003 
Intercompany investment  (248,051)  2,944   245,107   -   - 
Intercompany receivable/payable  (895,004)  953,623   (58,619)  -   - 
Total liabilities  (236,002)  1,167,838   270,515   -   1,202,351 
                     
Stockholder's equity  355,430   (72,218)  (6,546)  (18)  276,648 
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $119,428  $1,095,620  $263,969  $(18) $1,478,999 


 
F-78F-50
 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands)

       Non-              Non-       
    Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating        Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
 Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated  Parent  Subsidiary  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                              
Cash flows from operating activities:                              
Net income (loss) $(6,897) $(7,560) $4,940  $2,620  $(6,897) $(76,688) $(55,155) $17,752  $37,403  $(76,688)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  19,121   10,397   8,509   (2,620)  35,407 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non-cash items, included in net income (loss)  93,160   70,023   5,365   (37,403)  131,145 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  12,224   2,837   13,449   -   28,510   16,472   14,868   23,117   -   54,457 
Cash flows from investing activities:                                        
Payment for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired
 (18,935) $-  $-  $-  $(18,935)
Capital expenditures  (5)  (1,746)  (1,592)      (3,343) (11) (13,377) (5,329) -  (18,717)
Other  (13)  -   15   -   2 
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   1,197   242   -   1,439 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (18)  (1,746)  (1,577)  -   (3,341)  (18,946) $(12,180) $(5,087) $-  $(36,213)
Cash flows from financing activities:                                        
Debt repayments  (1,313)  (4)          (1,317) (5,250) (324) -  -  (5,574)
Debt financing costs  (439)  -   -   -   (439)  (340)  -   -   -   (340)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (1,752)  (4)  -   -   (1,756)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  (5,590)  (324)  -   -   (5,914)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   (4,496)      (4,496)  -   -   (8,731)  -   (8,731)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  10,454   1,087   7,376   -   18,917 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (8,064) 2,364  9,299  -  3,599 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  39,285   (2,379)  17,243   -   54,149   39,285   (2,379)  17,243   -   54,149 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $49,739  $(1,292) $24,619  $-  $73,066  $31,221  $(15) $26,542  $-  $57,748 

 
F-79F-51
 


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to September 30, 2007
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from August 15, 2007 to June 30, 2008
(In thousands)

       Non-              Non-       
    Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating        Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
 Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                              
Cash flows from operating activities:                              
Net income (loss) $(50,498) $(23,329) $(4,027) $27,356  $(50,498) $(105,425) $(77,952) $(5,989) $83,941  $(105,425)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   962   -   -   962   -   4,821   -   -   4,821 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (50,498)  (22,367)  (4,027)  27,356   (49,536) (105,425) (73,131) (5,989) 83,941  (100,604)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  18,690   24,058   439   (22,714)  20,473   95,482   88,036   15,223   (83,941)  114,800 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  (31,808)  1,691   (3,588)  4,642   (29,063) (9,943) 14,905  9,234  -  14,196 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (1,325)  -   -   (1,325)  -   (5,286)  -   -   (5,286)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (31,808)  366   (3,588)  4,642   (30,388)  (9,943)  9,619   9,234   -   8,910 
Cash flows from investing activities:                                        
Acquisition of predecessor entity, net of cash acquired  (1,128,915)  (2,593)  13,215   -   (1,118,293)  (1,128,915)  (2,593)  13,215   -   (1,118,293)
Payment for purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired  (11,145)  -   -   -   (11,145)
Capital expenditures  (57)  (1,161)  (204)  -   (1,422) (142) (9,386) (3,651) -  (13,179)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   -   15   -   15   -   52   177   -   229 
Purchase of marketable securities  (317,104)  -   -   -   (317,104) (631,805) -  -  -  (631,805)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  267,426   -   -   -   267,426   611,853   -   -   -   611,853 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (1,178,650)  (3,754)  13,026   -   (1,169,378)  (1,160,154)  (11,927)  9,741   -   (1,162,340)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (2)  -   -   (2)  -   (36)  -   -   (36)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (1,178,650)  (3,756)  13,026   -   (1,169,380)  (1,160,154)  (11,963)  9,741   -   (1,162,376)
Cash flows from financing activities:                                        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  378,350   -   -   -   378,350  378,350  -  -  -  378,350 
Borrowings under debt agreements  870,000   -   -   -   870,000  870,000  -  -  -  870,000 
Debt repayments  (1,809)  (5)  -   -   (1,814) (5,746) (35) (302) -  (6,083)
Debt financing costs  (27,145)  -   -   -   (27,145) (33,222) -  -  -  (33,222)
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (14,142)  -   -   -   (14,142)  (14,142)  -   -   -   (14,142)
Witholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  14,142   -   -   -   14,142 
Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  14,142   -   -   -   14,142 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  1,219,396   (5)  -   -   1,219,391   1,209,382   (35)  (302)  -   1,209,045 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   (564)  -   (564)  -   -   (1,430)  -   (1,430)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  8,938   (3,395)  8,874   4,642   19,059  39,285  (2,379) 17,243  -  54,149 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $8,938  $(3,395) $8,874  $4,642  $19,059  $39,285  $(2,379) $17,243  $-  $54,149 


 
F-80F-52
 


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Period from July 1, 2007 to August 14, 2007
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $(16,916) $(15,179) $(8,068) $23,247  $(16,916)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   2,508   -   -   2,508 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (16,916)  (12,671)  (8,068)  23,247   (14,408)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  23,110   12,708   13,591   (23,247)  26,162 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  6,194   37   5,523   -   11,754 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (461)  -   -   (461)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  6,194   (424)  5,523   -   11,293 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Capital expenditures  (249)  (587)  (252)  -   (1,088)
Purchase of marketable securities  (53,828)  -   -   -   (53,828)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  63,328   -   -   -   63,328 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  9,251   (587)  (252)  -   8,412 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (6)  -   -   (6)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  9,251   (593)  (252)  -   8,406 
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Debt repayments  (26)  (3)  -   -   (29)
Debt financing costs  (477)  -   -   -   (477)
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  12,542   -   -   -   12,542 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  583   -   -   -   583 
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (56)  -   -   -   (56)
Withholding taxes collected for stock option exercises  56   -   -   -   56 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  12,622   (3)  -   -   12,619 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   178   -   178 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  28,067   (1,020)  5,449   -   32,496 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  6,807   (1,573)  7,766   -   13,000 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $34,874  $(2,593) $13,215  $-  $45,496 
 
F-81F-53

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2007
(In thousands)

        Non-       
     Guarantor  Guarantor  Consolidating    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net income (loss) $4,926  $7,116  $(5,528) $(1,588) $4,926 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  -   3,868   -   -   3,868 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  4,926   10,984   (5,528)  (1,588)  8,794 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non cash items, included in net income (loss)  2,779   726   8,592   1,588   13,685 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations  7,705   11,710   3,064   -   22,479 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (1,677)  -   -   (1,677)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  7,705   10,033   3,064   -   20,802 
Cash flows from investing activities:                    
Payment for purchase of business, net of cash acquired  (10,663)  -   -   -   (10,663)
Contingent payment for purchase of business  (9,247)  -   -   -   (9,247)
Capital expenditures  (1,331)  (12,766)  (4,330)  -   (18,427)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  -   382   98   -   480 
Purchase of marketable securities  (589,577)  -   -   -   (589,577)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  608,409   -   -   -   608,409 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  (2,409)  (12,384)  (4,232)  -   (19,025)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  -   (88)  -   -   (88)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (2,409)  (12,472)  (4,232)  -   (19,113)
Cash flows from financing activities:                    
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock  (17,234)  -   -   -   (17,234)
Debt repayments  (315)  (11)  (285)  -   (611)
Excess tax benefits from share based compensation arrangements  2,870   -   -   -   2,870 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  14,182   -   -   -   14,182 
Amounts paid for withholding taxes on stock option exercises  (3,383)  -   -   -   (3,383)
Withholding taxes collected for stock options exercises  3,383   -   -   -   3,383 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  (497)  (11)  (285)  -   (793)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  -   -   1,717   -   1,717 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  4,799   (2,450)  264   -   2,613 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  2,008   877   7,502   -   10,387 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $6,807  $(1,573) $7,766  $-  $13,000 
F-54

21.Subsequent Events

In accordance with the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” the Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2009 up through September 1, 2009, the date the Company issued these consolidated financial statements.  Based on that evaluation, we have determined no material events or transactions occurred after June 30, 2009 up through September 1, 2009 that would affect the June 30, 2009 consolidated financial statements.

22. 
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):

(In thousands)
  Quarter  Year Ended 
2009 First  Second  Third  Fourth  June 30, 
                
Net sales $140,845  $156,815  $139,439  $162,237  $599,336 
Gross profit  67,359   73,159   66,605   77,982   285,105 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (6,897)  (4,107)  (13,734)  (51,950)  (76,688)

  Quarter  Year Ended 
2008 First  Second  Third  Fourth  June 30, 
                
Net sales $140,236  $160,757  $157,304  $184,915  $643,212 
Gross profit  52,615   54,633   69,236   90,914   267,398 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  (63,944)  (29,068)  (15,437)  (6,563)  (115,012)

Note:  We are not presenting per share data here as we currently only have one shareholder.
F-55
 
AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In thousands)
Column A Column B  Column C  Column D  Column E 
     Additions       
                
Description Balance at beginning of period  Charged to costs and expenses  Charged to other accounts - describe  Deductions - describe  Balance at end of period 
                
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009:
               
(Successor Entity)               
                
Allowance for doubtful accounts $2,683  $1,591  $-  $2,024(B)  $2,250 
                     
PERIOD FROM AUGUST 15, 2007 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2008:
                    
(Successor Entity)                    
                     
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,531  $1,295  $-  $143(B)  $2,683 
                     
PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2007 THROUGH AUGUST 14, 2007:
                    
(Predecessor Entity)                    
                     
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,589  $(33) $-  $25(B)  $1,531 
                     
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2007:
                    
(Predecessor Entity)                    
                     
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,273  $416  $25(A)  $125(B)  $1,589 
Note:  (A)  Acquired in purchase of businesses.
                  (B)  Primarily net write-offs of uncollectible amounts.
F-56

PROSPECTUS DATED ________________, 2009

AEROFLEX INCORPORATED

$225,000,000 11.75% Senior Notes due February 15, 2015


PROSPECTUS

 
The issuer has not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to give you written information other than this prospectus or to make representations as to matters not stated in this prospectus. You must not rely on unauthorized information. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities or the issuer's solicitation of your offer to buy the securities in any jurisdiction where that would not be permitted or legal. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sales made hereunder after the date of this prospectus shall create an implication that the information contained herein or the affairs of our company have not changed since the date hereof.


PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 13.Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

The following table sets forth the estimated expenses incurred or expected to be incurred in connection with this registration statement and the transactions contemplated hereby:

ITEM AMOUNT  AMOUNT 
SEC registration fee $(1) $–        (1)
Printing and engraving expenses $5,000 
Legal fees and expenses $38,750  $30,000 
Trustee fees $7,500 
Accounting fees and expenses $38,750  $25,000 
Miscellaneous expenses $10,000  $10,000 
 $ 100,000  $65,000 
 ____________
 (1)   Pursuant to Rule 457(q) of the Securities Act, no filing fee is required.
(1)Pursuant to Rule 457(q) of the Securities Act, no filing fee is required.

Item 14.Indemnification of Directors and Officers

California Registrant
 
Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California.
 
Section 204(a)(10) of the California General Corporation Law, or the CGCL, allows a corporation to include a provision in its articles of incorporation eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a director for monetary damages in an action brought by or in the right of the corporation for breach of the director's duties to the corporation and its shareholders, except for the liability of a director resulting from (i) acts or omissions involving intentional misconduct or a knowing and culpable violation of law, (ii) acts or omissions that a director believes to be contrary to the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders or that involve the absence of good faith on the part of the director, (iii) any transaction from which a director derived an improper personal benefit, (iv) acts or omissions showing a reckless disregard for the director's duty to the corporation or its shareholders in circumstances in which the director was aware, or should have been aware, in the ordinary course of performing a director’s duties, or a risk of serious injury to the corporation or its shareholders, (v) acts or omissions constituting an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts to an abdication of the director’s duty to the corporation or its shareholders, (vi) liability under California law relating to the interests of directors in certain contracts or other transactions between the corporation and the director, (vii) the making of an illegal distribution or loan to shareholders, (viii) acts or omissions occurring prior to the date when such provision became effective, (ix) acts or omissions of an officer who is also a director or (x) acts or omissions of an officer that have been ratified by the directors.
 
Section 317 of the CGCL provides that a corporation shall have power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor) by reason of the fact that the person is or was an agent of the corporation, against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the proceeding if that person acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and, in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct of the person was unlawful.  This section also provides that a corporation shall have power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that the person is or was an agent of the corporation, against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by that person in connection with the defense or settlement of the action if the person acted in good faith, in a manner the person believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders, so long as such indemnification is subject to certain limitations and conditions as provided therein.

II-1
 
The articles of incorporation of Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. provide that the liability of directors for monetary damages shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under the CGCL and that the corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of agents through bylaw provisions, agreements with agents, vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, in excess of the indemnification otherwise permitted by Section 317 of the CGCL, subject only to the applicable limits set forth in Section 204 of the CGCL with respect to actions for breach of duty to the corporation and its shareholders.

II-1
 
 The bylaws of Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. provide that Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. shall provide indemnification to directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under California law.  The bylaws further provide that Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. may also provide indemnification to its employees and agents.  Any such indemnification is subject to the terms of any agreement between Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. and any such director, officer, employee, or agent, and the limitations and qualifications more fully described in the bylaws of Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc.
 
Delaware Registrants
 
The following registrants are corporations organized under the laws of the State of Delaware: Aeroflex Incorporated, Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Plainview, Inc., Aeroflex Wichita, Inc., IFR Systems, Inc., and AIF Corp., and Aeroflex International Inc.
 
Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, enables a Delaware corporation to provide in its certificate of incorporation for the elimination or limitation of the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. However, no such provision can eliminate or limit a director's liability for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, for unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock purchase or redemption, or for any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit.
 
Section 145 of the DGCL authorizes a corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party, to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the person's conduct was unlawful. In addition, the DGCL does not permit indemnification in any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability, but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses, which such court shall deem proper. To the extent that a present or former director or officer of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to above, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter, such person shall be indemnified against expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and reasonably incurred by such person. Indemnity is mandatory to the extent a claim, issue or matter has been successfully defended.

These provisions will not limit the liability of directors or officers under the federal securities laws of the United States.

II-2

The certificate of incorporation of Aeroflex Incorporated provides the corporation shall indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any person (a "Covered Person") who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person for whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the Corporation or, while a director or officer of the Corporation, is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, enterprise or nonprofit entity, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, against all liability and loss suffered and expenses (including attorneys' fees) reasonably incurred by such Covered Person. The corporation shall be required to indemnify a Covered Person in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) commenced by such Covered Person only if the commencement of such proceeding (or part thereof) by the Covered Person was authorized by the board. The rights conferred on any Covered Person shall not be exclusive of any other rights that such Covered Person may have under any statute, provision of this certificate of incorporation, the by-laws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.

II-2
The bylaws of Aeroflex Incorporated provide that to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the corporation shall indemnify, and advance expenses to, each and every person who is or was a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of the corporation or of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise in which such person is or was serving at the request of the corporation and who, because of any such position or status, is directly or indirectly involved in any action, suit, arbitration, alternate dispute resolution mechanism, investigation, administrative hearing or any other proceeding whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative.  The bylaws further provide the corporation the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such capacity or arising out of his status as such whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify him against such liability under applicable law.

The certificates of incorporation of Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., and Aeroflex Plainview, Inc. and Aeroflex International Inc do not contain any provisions, sections, or articles relating to indemnification.
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. state that the company shall indemnify its officers, directors, employees and agents to the extent permitted by the DGCL.
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex Plainview, Inc., and Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. and Aeroflex International Inc.  do not contain any articles, sections, or provisions relating to indemnification.
 
The certificate of incorporation of Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. provides that a director will not be liable to the company or any of its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the DGCL.
 
The certificates of incorporation of IFR Systems, Inc. and AIF Corp. essentially contain the same rights of indemnification as Aeroflex Incorporated.
 
The bylaws of IFR Systems, Inc. and AIF Corp. provide that the company shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the company) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the company, or is or was a director or officer of the company serving at the request of the company as a director or officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the company, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful.

II-3
 
The bylaws of IFR Systems, Inc. and AIF Corp. further provide that the company shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the company to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the company, or is or was a director or officer of the company serving at the request of the company as a director or officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action and or suit if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the company; except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the company unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.

II-3
 
The bylaws of IFR Systems, Inc. and AIF Corp. further provide that any indemnification as described above is to be made by the company only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director or officer is proper in the circumstances because such person has met the applicable standard of conduct, which is set forth in Sections 1 and 2 of Article VIII of the bylaws.  If, however, a present or former director or officer of the company is successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding described above, he shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith, without the necessity of authorization in the specific case.   The bylaws further provide that any director or officer may apply to the Court of Chancery in Delaware for indemnification to the extent permissible by Sections 1 and 2 of Article VIII of the bylaws.  The indemnification provided by or granted under the bylaws is not exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled under the certificate of incorporation, any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in such person’s official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office, it being the policy of the company that indemnification of persons specified in Sections 1 and 2 of Article VIII of the bylaws shall be made to the fullest extent permitted by law.  This does not preclude indemnification of any person who is not specified in Sections 1 and 2 of Article VIII of the bylaws but whom the company has the power or obligation to indemnify under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
 
The bylaws of IFR Systems, Inc. and AIF Corp. permit the company to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director or officer of the company, or is or was a director or officer of the company serving at the request of the company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person’s status as such, whether or  not the company would have the power or obligation to indemnify such person against liability.
 
The bylaws of IFR Systems, Inc. and AIF Corp. provide that notwithstanding anything contained in Article VIII of the bylaws to the contrary, except for proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, the company shall not be obligated to indemnify any director or officer in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized or consented to by the Board of Directors of the company.  The bylaws state that the company may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors, provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to employees and agents of the company similar to those conferred in Article VIII of the bylaws to directors and officers of the company.

 
II-4
Kansas Registrant
 
IFR Finance, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Kansas.

Under Section 17-6305 of the Kansas General Corporation Code, or the KGCC, a corporation may indemnify a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation (or other entity if such person is serving in such capacity at the corporation’s request) against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. In the case of an action brought by or in the right of a corporation, the corporation may indemnify a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation (or other entity if such person is serving in such capacity at the corporation’s request) against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless a court determines that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for such expenses as the court shall deem proper. Expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by an officer or director in defending any civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation.
 
The certificate of incorporation of IFR Finance, Inc. states that no director shall be held personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for breach of fiduciary duty as a director except for liability (A) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, policyholders or members, (B) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (C) under the provisions of Section 17-6424 of the KGCC, or (D) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.  The certificate further provides that it shall indemnify any director or officer of the corporation who was, is, or is threatened to be made a party, to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (collectively, a “Proceeding”), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee, trustee, partner or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, to the fullest extent permitted by the KGCC, now in effect and as hereafter amended. The certificate also provides that any such right to indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other right to indemnification which a person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, bylaw, agreement, contract, resolution of the board of directors or stockholders of the company, or otherwise.

II-4
 
The bylaws of IFR Finance, Inc. contain no provisions, sections, or articles pertaining to indemnification.
 
Michigan Registrants
 
The following registrants are corporations organized under the laws of the State of Michigan: Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc., Aeroflex/KDI, Inc., Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc., Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc., and MCE Asia, Inc.
 
Section 450.1561 of the Michigan Business Corporation Act, or MBCA, permits a corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to a threatened, pending or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative and whether formal or informal, other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, whether for profit or not, against expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the action, suit, or proceeding, if the person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders, and with respect to a criminal action or proceeding, if the person had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

II-5
 
Section 450.1562 of the MBCA provides that a corporation may indemnify a person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to a threatened, pending, or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, whether for profit or not, against expenses, including attorneys' fees, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the action or suit, if the person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders, except that no indemnification shall be made for a claim, issue or matter in which the person has been found liable to the corporation, except to the extent authorized in Section 450.1564c.
 
Section 450.1563 of the MBCA provides that to the extent that a director or officer of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of an action, suit, or proceeding referred to in Section 450.1561 or Section 450.1562, or in defense of a claim, issue, or matter in the action, suit, or proceeding, the corporation shall indemnify him or her against actual and reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred by him or her in connection with the action, suit, or proceeding and an action, suit, or proceeding brought to enforce the mandatory indemnification provided in such Section 450.1563.
 
Section 450.1567 of the MBCA provides that a corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation, or who is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise against any liability asserted against him or her and incurred by him or her in any such capacity or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation would have power to indemnify him or her against liability under Sections 450.1561 to 450.1565.
 
The certificates of incorporation of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc., Aeroflex/KDI, Inc., MCE Asia, Inc. and Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc. provide that no director shall be personally liable to the corporations or their shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided that the foregoing shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director for any of the following: (i) breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders; (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law; (iii) a violation of Section 551(1) of the MBCA; or (iv) a transaction from which a director derived an improper personal benefit.  The certificates of incorporation further provide that the liability of directors, the liability of directors of the corporations will be limited to the fullest extent permitted by the MBCA.

II-5
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. provide that the corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to a threatened, pending or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative and whether formal or informal (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including actual and reasonable attorneys' fees), judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the action, suit, or proceeding if the person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders, and with respect to a criminal action or proceeding, if the person had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

II-6
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. further state that the corporation shall indemnify a person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to a threatened, pending, or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, whether for profit or not, against expenses (including attorneys' fees) and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the action or suit, if the person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders, except that no indemnification shall be made for a claim, issue or matter in which the person has been found liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which such action or suit was brought has determined upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for the reasonable expenses incurred.
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex/KDI, Inc., Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc., and MCE Asia, Inc. essentially contain the similar indemnification provisions as Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. except that if the director is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, he must be serving in such position at the time he was serving as a director of officer of the respective corporation.
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc., Aeroflex/KDI, Inc., Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc., and MCE Asia, Inc. further provide that if a person has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to above, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter in the action, suit or proceeding, the person shall be indemnified against actual and reasonable expenses (including attorney’s fees) incurred by such person in connection with the action, suit or proceeding any action, suit or proceeding brought to enforce the mandatory indemnification provided therein.
 
The right to indemnification conferred in Article XI of the bylaws of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc., Aeroflex/KDI, Inc., Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc., and MCE Asia, Inc. is a contractual right and applies to services of a director or officer as an employee or agent of the corporation as well as in such person’s capacity as a director or officer.  Except as provided in Section 11.03 of the bylaws, the companies have no obligation to indemnify any person in connection with any proceeding, initiated by such person without authorization by the board of directors.  Such indemnification is not exclusive of other rights to which a person seeking indemnification may be entitled under a contractual arrangement with the corporation.  However, the total amount of indemnification sought from all sources combined shall not exceed the amount of actual expenses incurred by the person seeking indemnification.
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc., Aeroflex/KDI, Inc., Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc., and MCE Asia, Inc. also provide that the corporations may, to the extent authorized by their respective boards of directors, grant rights to indemnification to any employee or agent of the corporation to the fullest extent of Article XI of the bylaws with respect to the indemnification to directors and officers of the company.  The bylaws permit the corporations to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the company, or is or was serving at the request of the corporations as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability asserted against the person and incurred by him in any such capacity or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the corporations would have the power to indemnify the person against such liability under the bylaws or MBCA.
 
The certificate of incorporation of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc. does not contain any provisions, sections, or articles regarding indemnification.

 
II-6II-7
 
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc. state that the corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to a threatened, pending or completed action, suit, or proceeding by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the company or is or was serving at the  request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against all expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of such action, suit or proceeding, to the fullest extent permitted by the MBCA.  This right of indemnification is not exclusive of any other rights to which such director, officer, employee or agent is or may be entitled and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of each such person.
 
New Jersey Registrant
 
Comar Products, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey.

Section 14A:3-5 of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act, or the NJBCA, sets forth the extent to which a corporation is authorized to indemnify its directors, officers and other corporate agents in various proceedings. Generally, the NJBCA authorizes a New Jersey corporation to indemnify a corporate agent (including an officer or director) against expenses and liabilities incurred in connection with any proceeding involving the corporate agent by reason of being or having been a corporate agent if (a) the corporate agent acted in good faith or in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, and (b) with respect to any criminal proceeding, the corporate agent had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. In any proceeding by the corporation or in the right of the corporation, the corporation is authorized to indemnify a corporate agent against his expenses if the agent acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, but the corporation is not authorized to indemnify a corporate agent against expenses with respect to any claim, issue or matter as to which the agent was adjudged liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that a court deems such indemnification would be proper.

If the corporation is authorized but not required to indemnify a corporate agent, the corporation may only do so if a determination is made that the applicable standard of conduct was met by such corporate agent. The determination may be made by the board of directors of the corporation, or a committee thereof, acting by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of disinterested directors; by independent legal counsel, if there is not a quorum of disinterested directors or if the disinterested quorum directs such counsel to make the determination; or by the shareholders of the corporation.   A New Jersey corporation is required to indemnify a corporate agent to the extent that the corporate agent is successful on the merits or otherwise in any proceeding of the types described above, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter in the proceeding. If a corporation fails or refuses to indemnify a corporate agent, whether the indemnification is permissive or mandatory, the agent may apply to a court to grant him the requested indemnification. In advance of the final disposition of any proceeding, the board of directors may direct the corporation to pay an agent's expenses if the agent agrees to repay the expenses in the event that it is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to indemnification.

The indemnification and advance of expenses authorized or required by the NJBCA do not exclude any other rights to which a corporate agent may be entitled under a certificate of incorporation, bylaw, agreement, vote of shareholders, or otherwise; provided that no indemnification may be made to or on behalf of a corporate agent if a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to the corporate agent establishes that his or her acts or omissions (a) were in breach of his or her duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders, (b) were not in good faith or involved a knowing violation of law or (c) resulted in receipt by the corporate agent of an improper personal benefit.

The power to indemnify corporate agents granted to New Jersey corporations pursuant to the NJBCA may be exercised notwithstanding the absence of any provision in a corporation's certificate of incorporation or bylaws authorizing the exercise of such powers.

II-8

Neither the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Comar Products, Inc. contains any provisions, articles, or sections relating to indemnification.

New Hampshire Registrant

Micro-Metrics,MicroMetrics, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Hampshire.

II-7

Chapter 293-A:8.51 of the New Hampshire Business Corporation Act, or NHBCA, provides that a corporation may indemnify an individual made a party to a proceeding because he is or was a director, against liability incurred in the proceeding if:  (1) he conducted himself in good faith; and (2) he reasonably believed (i) in the case of conduct in his official capacity with the corporation, that his conduct was in its best interests, and (ii) in all other cases, that his conduct was at least not opposed to its best interests; and (3) in the case of any criminal proceeding, he had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.  A corporation may not indemnify a director (1) in connection with a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation in which the director was adjudged liable to the corporation or (2) in connection with any other proceeding charging improper personal benefit to him, whether or not involving action in his official capacity, in which he was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received by him.  Chapter 293-A:8.52 of the NHBCA provides that unless limited by its articles of incorporation, a corporation shall indemnify a director who was wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he was a party because he is or was a director of the corporation against reasonable expenses incurred by him in connection with the proceeding.

Chapter 293-A:8.56 of the NHBCA states that unless a corporation's articles of incorporation provide otherwise: (1) an officer of the corporation who is not a director is entitled to mandatory indemnification under Chapter 293-A:8.52, and is entitled to apply for court-ordered indemnification under Chapter 293-A:8.54, in each case to the same extent as a director; (2) the corporation may indemnify and advance expenses under this subdivision to an officer, employee or agent of the corporation who is not a director, to the same extent as to a director; and (3) a corporation may also indemnify and advance expenses to an officer, employee, or agent who is not a director to the extent, consistent with public policy, that may be provided by its articles of incorporation, bylaws, general or specific action of its board of directors, or contract.

The certificate of incorporation of Micro-Metrics,MicroMetrics, Inc. does not contain any sections, provisions, or articles relating to indemnification.

The bylaws of Micro-Metrics,MicroMetrics, Inc. provide that to the fullest extent permitted by law, no director or officer of the company shall be personally liable to the company or its shareholders for any action or failure to take any action as a director or officer except for any claims or actions related to acts or omissions concerning professional liability or malpractice.  The bylaws do not eliminate or limit the liability of a director or officer for any act or omission occurring prior to the effective date of its adoption.

New York Registrants

Aeroflex Bloomingdale Inc. and Aeroflex Properties Corp. are corporations organized under the laws of the State of New York.

Section 722(a) of the New York Business Corporation Law, or NYBCL, provides that a corporation may indemnify any officer or director, made or threatened to be made, a party to an action or proceeding, other than one by or in the right of the corporation, including an action by or on the right of any other corporation or other enterprise, which any director or officer of the corporation served in any capacity at the request of the corporation, because he was a director or officer of the corporation, or served such other corporation or other enterprise in any capacity, against judgments, fines, amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees actually and necessarily incurred as a result of such action or proceeding, or any appeal therein, if such director or officer acted, in good faith, for a purpose which he reasonably believed to be in, or in the case of service for any other corporation or other enterprise, not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, in criminal actions or proceedings, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

II-9

Section 722(c) of the NYBCL provides that a corporation may indemnify any officer or director made, or threatened to be made, a party to an action by or in the right of the corporation by reason of the fact that he is or was a director or officer of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director or officer of any other corporation of any type or kind, or other enterprise, against amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and necessarily incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of such action, or in connection with an appeal therein, if such director or officer acted, in good faith, for a purpose which he reasonably believed to be in, or, in the case of service for another corporation or other enterprise, not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation. The corporation may not, however, indemnify any officer or director pursuant to Section 722(c) in respect of (1) a threatened action, or a pending action which is settled or otherwise disposed of, or (2) any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action was brought or, if no action was brought, any court of competent jurisdiction, determines upon application, that the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such portion of the settlement and expenses as the court deems proper.

II-8

Section 723 of the NYBCL provides that an officer or director who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of a civil or criminal action of the character set forth in Section 722 is entitled to indemnification as permitted in such Section. Section 724 of the NYBCL permits a court to award the indemnification required by Section 722.
 
The Certificates of Incorporation of Aeroflex Bloomingdale Inc. and Aeroflex Properties Corp. do not contain any provision, section, or articles pertaining to indemnification.
 
The bylaws of Aeroflex Bloomingdale Inc. provide that the corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit or proceeding, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against all expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of such action, suit or proceeding, to the fullest extent and in the manner set forth in and permitted by the NYBCLaw.  The bylaws further state that such right of indemnification shall not be deemed exclusive of any rights to which such current or past director, officer, employee or agent may be entitled to and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of such person.

The bylaws of Aeroflex Properties Corp. provide for indemnification and reimbursement to the fullest extent permitted by law for any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit or proceeding, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise.

Ohio Registrant

Aeroflex High Speed Test Solutions, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Ohio.  Under Section 1701.13 of the Ohio General Corporation Law, or OGCL, Ohio corporations are permitted to indemnify directors, officers, employees and agents within prescribed limits and must indemnify them under certain circumstances.  The OGCL does not authorize the payment by a corporation of judgments against a director, officer, employee or agent after a finding of negligence or misconduct in a derivative suit absent a court order determining that such person succeeds on the merits. In all other cases, if it is determined that a director, officer, employee or agent acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the corporation, indemnification is discretionary except as otherwise provided by a corporation's articles of incorporation, code of regulations or contract, and except with respect to the advancement of expenses of directors.

II-10

With respect to the advancement of expenses, the OGCL provides that a director (but not an officer, employee or agent) is entitled to mandatory advancement of expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred in defending any action, including derivative actions, brought against the director, provided that the director agrees to cooperate with the corporation concerning the matter and to repay the amount advanced if it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that his or her act or failure to act was done with deliberate intent to cause injury to the corporation or with reckless disregard for the corporation's best interests.

Neither the Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws of Aeroflex High Speed Test Solutions, Inc. contains any articles, provisions, or sections pertaining to indemnification.

 
Texas Registrant
II-9
 
VI Technology, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas.


Item 15.         Recent SalesUnder Section 2.02-1 of Unregistered Securities.the Texas Business Corporation Act, or the TBCA, a corporation may indemnify a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation (or other entity if such person is serving in such capacity at the corporation’s request) against expenses (including attorneys’ fees and court costs), if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.  No person may be indemnified in respect of a proceeding in which he is found liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received or in which he is found liable to the corporation.

The certificate of incorporation of VI Technology, Inc. does not contain articles, provisions, or sections pertaining to indemnification.
The bylaws of VI Technology, Inc. state that the corporation shall indemnify any director or officer or former director or officer, or any person who may have served at its request as a director or officer or former director or officer of another corporation in which it owns shares of capital stock or of which it is a creditor, against expenses actually incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of any suit or proceeding in which he is a party by reason of being or having been such director or officer, except if he shall be liable for negligence or misconduct in performance of duty.
Item 15.Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

During the three years preceding the filing of this registration statement, the Registrants have not sold their securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as described below:

On August 7, 2008, Aeroflex Incorporated (the “Company”) issued $225,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of its 11.75% senior notes due February 15, 2015 (the “Notes”).  The Notes are guaranteed by the guarantors listed on page iiiii of this registration statement.  The initial sale of the Notes was made to Goldman, Sachs & Co. in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  Thereafter, Goldman, Sachs & Co. resold all of the Notes to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act.   The Notes are presently subject to an exchange offering.

On August 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by affiliates of or funds managed by the Sponsors pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger, dated as of May 25, 2007.  As consideration for the merger, all shares of common stock of the Company were converted into the right to receive $14.50 in cash per share, without interest and less any applicable withholding tax.  Also pursuant to the merger agreement all of our stock option plans were terminated and all stock options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment equal to the number of shares of our common stock underlying the options multiplied by that amount, if any, by which $14.50 exceeded the exercise price, without interest and less any withholding taxes.  The aggregate purchase price paid to shareholders and holders of options was approximately $1.1 billion.

II-11

During fiscal 2005, the Company’s then Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program.  During fiscal 2007, and 2006, a total of 1,753,838 and 35,000common shares respectively, were repurchased for $17.2 million and $402,000, respectively, and retired.

Item 16.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibit No. Exhibit Description
   
1.1 Purchase Agreement, dated August 4, 2008, among Aeroflex Incorporated, the Guarantors set forth therein (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”), and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-156061) filed December 11, 2008, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement filed on January 16, 2009 (the “Registration Statement on Form S-4”)).
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 25, 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated, AX Holding Corp. and AX Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 29, 2007).
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2007).
3.2 Bylaws of Aeroflex Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2007).
3.3 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.4 Bylaws of Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.5 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex High Speed Test Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.6 Bylaws of Aeroflex High Speed Test Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.7 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.8 Bylaws of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.9 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex/KDI, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.10 Bylaws of Aeroflex/KDI, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).

II-10

3.11 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.12 Bylaws of Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.13 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.14 Bylaws of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.14 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.15 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Plainview, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.15 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.16 Bylaws of Aeroflex Plainview, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
II-12

3.17 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.17 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.18 Bylaws of Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.19 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.19 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.20 Bylaws of Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.20 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.21 Articles of Incorporation of IFR Finance, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.22 Bylaws of IFR Finance, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.22 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.23 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of IFR Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.24 Bylaws of IFR Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.24 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.25 Articles of Organization of MCE Asia, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.25 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.26 Bylaws of MCE Asia, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.26 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.27 Certificate of Incorporation of AIF Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.27 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.28 Bylaws of AIF Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.28 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.29 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Bloomingdale, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.29 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.30 Bylaws of Aeroflex Bloomingdale, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.30 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.31 Articles of Incorporation of Micro-Metrics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.31 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.32 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Micro-Metrics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.32 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.33 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Properties Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.33 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.34 Bylaws of Aeroflex Properties Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.34 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.35 Certificate of Incorporation of Comar Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.35 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.36 Bylaws of Comar Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.36 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.373.37* Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex InternationalVI Technology, Inc. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 3.37 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).
3.383.38* Bylaws of Aeroflex InternationalVI Technology, Inc. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 3.38 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).
4.1 Indenture, dated as of August 7, 2008, by and among Aeroflex Incorporated, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).

II-11

4.2 Form of 11.75% Senior Notes due February 15, 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
4.3 Form of Regulation S Temporary Global 11.75% Senior Notes due February 15, 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
4.4 Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 7, 2008, by and among Aeroflex Incorporated, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).
4.5 Form of Notation of Guarantee (included in Exhibit 4.1).
5.1* Opinion of Moomjian, Waite, Wactlar & Coleman, LLPLLP.
10.1 Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999).

II-13

10.2 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective September 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000).
10.3 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective August 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001).
10.4 Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective November 8, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001).
10.5 Executive Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., dated November 9, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’ s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2005).
10.6 Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Charles Badlato, dated November 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003).
10.7 Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, dated November 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003).
10.8 Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective as of May 13, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004).
10.9 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, dated March 11, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2005).
10.10 Amendment No. 5 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective August 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2005).
10.11 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., effective November 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 22, 2006).
10.12 Amendment No. 6 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective November 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 22, 2006).
10.13 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., effective December 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 2, 2007).
10.14 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated, Micro-Metrics, Inc. and the stockholders set forth therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.15 Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Leonard Borow, dated August 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.16 Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John E. Buyko, dated August 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.17 Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated (as successor to AX Acquisition Corp.), AX Holding Corp., the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the lenders party thereto and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
II-12

10.18 Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2007, by the grantors party thereto in favor of Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
II-14

10.19 Exchangeable Senior Unsecured Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated August 15, 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated (as successor to AX Acquisition Corp.), AX Holding Corp., the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the lenders party thereto, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.20 Advisory Services Agreement, dated August 15, 2007, by and among VGG Holding LLC, AX Holding Corp., Aeroflex Incorporated, Veritas Captial Fund Management, L.L.C., GGC Administration and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.21 Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated, certain subsidiaries of Aeroflex Incorporated, the lenders party thereto and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.22 Series A-1 Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2007, by and between Test Evolution Corporation, Lev Alperovich, and Aeroflex Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.23 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, effective December 17, 2007 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.24 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2008, between Aeroflex Incorporated and STAR Dynamics Holdings, LLC and TAZ Ventures, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.25 Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2008, between Aeroflex Incorporated and the Sellers named therein regarding the shares in Gaisler Research ABAB. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.26 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Charles Badlato, effective July 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.27 Amendment No.3 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, effective December 24, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.28 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Leonard Borow, effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.29 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Buyko, effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.30 Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.31 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Charles Badlato, effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.32 Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
12.110.33Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., effective September 17, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's current report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2009).
12.1* Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 12.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).Charges.
21.121.1* Subsidiaries of Aeroflex Incorporated (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).Incorporated.
23.1 Consent of Moomjian, Waite, Wactlar & Coleman, LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
23.2* Consent of KPMG LLP.
II-13

24.1 Powers of Attorney (included on signature pages of Part II to this Registration Statement).
25.1 Statement of Eligibility and Qualification on Form T-1 of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, as Trustee (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 25.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).

II-15

___________________________
*     Filed herewith

Item  17.Undertakings

(a)           The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:

(1)           To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:

(i)            To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii)           To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the Registration Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement;

(iii)           To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or any material change to such information in the Registration Statement;

            (2)           That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof; and

(3)           To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering;

(4)           that, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use; and

(b)           The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
II-16

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonChairman of the Board
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *Director, President and Chief
 Leonard BorowExecutive Officer
                   *Director, Executive Vice President,
 John E. BuykoPresident, Aeroflex Microelectronic
Solutions

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact
II-17

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary
* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

 
II-14II-18
 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2,September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX INCORPORATEDHIGH SPEED TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.
  
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
  
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Senior Vice President Chief Financial
 (Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-19

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX/INMET, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
 (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary
* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-20

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX/KDI, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary
* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-21

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX/METELICS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary
* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact
II-22

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX MICROELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary
* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-23

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX PLAINVIEW, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary
* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-24

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX/WEINSCHEL, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary
* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact
II-25

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX WICHITA, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-26

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

IFR FINANCE, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
 Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
 Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
 Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
 John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
 Leonard BorowSecretary
* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact
II-27

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

IFR SYSTEMS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
Leonard BorowSecretary

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-28

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

MCE ASIA, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
Leonard BorowSecretary


* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-29

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AIF CORP.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Charles Badlato
Name:Charles Badlato
Title:Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
Leonard BorowSecretary

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-30

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX BLOOMINGDALE, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
Leonard BorowSecretary

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-31

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

MICROMETRICS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
Leonard BorowSecretary

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-32

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

AEROFLEX PROPERTIES CORP.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Charles Badlato
Name:Charles Badlato
Title:Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
Leonard BorowSecretary

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-33

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

COMAR PRODUCTS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Charles Badlato
Name:Charles Badlato
Title:Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities indicated on September 22, 2009.

SignatureTitle
                   *
Robert B. McKeonDirector
                   *
Hugh D. EvansDirector
                   *
Ramzi M. MusallamDirector
                   *
John E. BuykoDirector
                   *Director, President and
Leonard BorowSecretary

* /s/ Leonard Borow
Leonard Borow
Attorney-in-Fact

II-34

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City Plainview, State of New York, on September 22, 2009.

VI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr..
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex IncorporatedVI Technology, Inc.  hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities andindicated on the dates indicated.September 22, 2009.

Signature TitleDate
   
/s/ Robert B. McKeon Chairman of the BoardFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon Director
   
/s/ Hugh D. Evans DirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans Director
   
/s/ Ramzi M. Musallam DirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam
/s/ Leonard Borow
Director, President and ChiefFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow
Executive Officer 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirector, Executive ViceFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko President 

II-15

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. Musallam DirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam    
/s/ John E. Buyko DirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President and  February 2, 2009
Leonard Borow Secretary 

II-16

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX HIGH SPEED TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex High Speed Test Solutions, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. Buyko DirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, PresidentFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow  

II-17

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX/INMET, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, Vice President andFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow Secretary

II-18

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX/KDI, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex/KDI, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, Vice President andFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow Secretary 

II-19

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX/METELICS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich,  Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, Vice President andFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow Secretary

II-20

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX MICROELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, Vice President andFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard BorowSecretary 

II-21

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX PLAINVIEW, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name: Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex Plainview, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko    
/s/ Leonard Borow Director, President andFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow Secretary

 
II-22

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.
AEROFLEX/WEINSCHEL, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, Vice President andFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow Secretary 

II-23

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX WICHITA, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President and SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 

II-24

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

IFR FINANCE, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of IFR Finance, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President and SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 
II-25

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

IFR SYSTEMS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of IFR Systems, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President and SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 

II-26

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

MCE ASIA, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of MCE Asia, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President and SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 

II-27

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AIF CORP.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Charles Badlato
Name:Charles Badlato
Title:Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of AIF Corp. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and Charles Badlato or either of them, as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President and SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 

II-28

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX BLOOMINGDALE, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex Bloomingdale, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President and SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 

II-29

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

MICROMETRICS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.
Name:John Adamovich, Jr.
Title:Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of MicroMetrics, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and John Adamovich, Jr. or either of them as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President and SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 

II-30

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX PROPERTIES CORP.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Charles Badlato
Name:Charles Badlato
Title:Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer )

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex Properties Corp. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and Charles Badlato or either of them, as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 

II-31

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

COMAR PRODUCTS, INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Charles Badlato
Name:Charles Badlato
Title:Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer )

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Comar Products, Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and Charles Badlato or either of them, as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, President andFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow Secretary 

II-32

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Plainview, State of New York, on February 2, 2009.

AEROFLEX INTERNATIONAL INC.
By:/s/ Leonard Borow
Name:Leonard Borow
Title:Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Charles Badlato
Name:Charles Badlato
Title:Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer )

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors and officers of Aeroflex International Inc. hereby appoint Leonard Borow and Charles Badlato or either of them, as attorney-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for, and in the name, place and stead of, the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) and exhibits to this registration statement on Form S-1 and any and all applications and other documents to be filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of the securities covered hereby, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Hugh D. EvansDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Hugh D. Evans 
/s/ Robert B. McKeonDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Robert B. McKeon 
/s/ Ramzi M. MusallamDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
Ramzi M. Musallam 
/s/ John E. BuykoDirectorFebruary 2, 2009
John E. Buyko 
/s/ Leonard BorowDirector, SecretaryFebruary 2, 2009
Leonard Borow 

II-33II-35
 

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No. Exhibit Description
   
1.1 Purchase Agreement, dated August 4, 2008, among Aeroflex Incorporated, the Guarantors set forth therein (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”), and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-156061) filed December 11, 2008, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement filed on January 16, 2009 (the “Registration Statement on Form S-4”)).
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 25, 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated, AX Holding Corp. and AX Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 29, 2007).
3.1 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed August 17, 2007).
3.2 Bylaws of Aeroflex Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2007).
3.3 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.4 Bylaws of Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.5 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex High Speed Test Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.6 Bylaws of Aeroflex High Speed Test Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.7 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.8 Bylaws of Aeroflex/Inmet, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.9 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex/KDI, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.10 Bylaws of Aeroflex/KDI, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.11 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.12 Bylaws of Aeroflex/Metelics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.13 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.14 Bylaws of Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.14 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.15 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Plainview, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.15 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.16 Bylaws of Aeroflex Plainview, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.17 Articles of Incorporation of Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.17 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.18 Bylaws of Aeroflex/Weinschel, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.19 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.19 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.20 Bylaws of Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.20 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.21 Articles of Incorporation of IFR Finance, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).

II-36

3.22 Bylaws of IFR Finance, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.22 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).


II-34


3.23 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of IFR Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.24 Bylaws of IFR Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.24 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.25 Articles of Organization of MCE Asia, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.25 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.26 Bylaws of MCE Asia, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.26 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.27 Certificate of Incorporation of AIF Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.27 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.28 Bylaws of AIF Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.28 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.29 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Bloomingdale, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.29 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.30 Bylaws of Aeroflex Bloomingdale, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.30 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.31 Articles of Incorporation of Micro-Metrics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.31 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.32 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Micro-Metrics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.32 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.33 Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex Properties Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.33 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.34 Bylaws of Aeroflex Properties Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.34 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.35 Certificate of Incorporation of Comar Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.35 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.36 Bylaws of Comar Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.36 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
3.373.37* Certificate of Incorporation of Aeroflex InternationalVI Technology, Inc. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 3.37 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).
3.383.38* Bylaws of Aeroflex InternationalVI Technology, Inc. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 3.38 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).
4.1 Indenture, dated as of August 7, 2008, by and among Aeroflex Incorporated, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
4.2 Form of 11.75% Senior Notes due February 15, 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
4.3 Form of Regulation S Temporary Global 11.75% Senior Notes due February 15, 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
4.4 Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 7, 2008, by and among Aeroflex Incorporated, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).
4.5 Form of Notation of Guarantee (included in Exhibit 4.1).
5.1* Opinion of Moomjian, Waite, Wactlar & Coleman, LLPLLP.
10.1  Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999).
10.2 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective September 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000).
10.3 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective August 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001).
10.4 Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective November 8, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001).

II-37

10.5 Executive Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., dated November 9, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’ s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2005).

II-35

10.6 Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Charles Badlato, dated November 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003).
10.7 Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, dated November 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003).
10.8 Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective as of May 13, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004).
10.9 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, dated March 11, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2005).
10.10 Amendment No. 5 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective August 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2005).
10.11 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John
Adamovich, Jr., effective November 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 22, 2006).
10.12 Amendment No. 6 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Harvey R. Blau, effective November 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 22, 2006).
10.13 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., effective December 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 2, 2007).
10.14 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated, Micro-Metrics, Inc. and the stockholders set forth therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.15��Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Leonard Borow, dated August 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.16 Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John E. Buyko, dated August 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.17 Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated (as successor to AX Acquisition Corp.), AX Holding Corp., the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the lenders party thereto and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.18 Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2007, by the grantors party thereto in favor of Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.19 Exchangeable Senior Unsecured Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated August 15, 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated (as successor to AX Acquisition Corp.), AX Holding Corp., the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the lenders party thereto, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.20 Advisory Services Agreement, dated August 15, 2007, by and among VGG Holding LLC, AX Holding Corp., Aeroflex Incorporated, Veritas CapitalCaptial Fund Management, L.L.C., GGC Administration and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.21 Senior Subordinated Unsecured Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2007, among Aeroflex Incorporated, certain subsidiaries of Aeroflex Incorporated, the lenders party thereto and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).

II-38

10.22 Series A-1 Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2007, by and between Test Evolution Corporation, Lev Alperovich, and Aeroflex Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.23 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, effective December 17, 2007 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).

II-36

10.24
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2008, between Aeroflex Incorporated and STAR Dynamics Holdings, LLC and TAZ Ventures, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.25Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2008, between Aeroflex Incorporated and the Sellers named therein regarding the shares in Gaisler Research ABAB. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.26Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Charles Badlato, effective July 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.27Amendment No.3 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, effective December 24, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.28Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Leonard Borow, effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.29Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Buyko, effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.30Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.31
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Charles Badlato, effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
10.32
Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and Carl Caruso, effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).S-4).
12.110.33Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr., effective September 17, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2009).
21.1*Subsidiaries of Aeroflex Incorporated.
12.1*Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 12.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).
21.1Subsidiaries of Aeroflex Incorporated (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).Charges.
23.1Consent of Moomjian, Waite, Wactlar & Coleman, LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
23.2*Consent of KPMG LLP.
24.1Powers of Attorney (included on signature pages of Part II to this Registration Statement).
25.1Statement of Eligibility and Qualification on Form T-1 of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, as Trustee (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 25.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 ).
___________________________
*     Filed herewith

 
II-37II-39