As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on January 20, 2011October 13, 2020

Registration No.       333-

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORMForm S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

CORTEXRESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 2834 33-0303583

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

15241 Barranca Parkway126 Valley Road, Suite C

Irvine, California 92618Glen Rock, New Jersey 07452

(949) 727-3157(201) 444-4947

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.

President and Jeff E. Margolis

Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.P.O. Box 1167

15241 Barranca ParkwayBridgehampton, NY 11932

Irvine, California 92618(917) 834-7206

(949) 727-3157

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copies to:

Elizabeth A. Diffley

Lawrence B. CohnAriel Greenstein

Marc G. AlcserFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Stradling Yocca Carlson & RauthOne Logan Square, Suite 2000

660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

Newport Beach, California 92660

(949) 725-4000Telephone: (215) 988-2700

 


Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:As soon as practicable From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement becomes effective.registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box. ¨[X]

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨[  ]

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨[  ]

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨[  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer¨ [  ]Accelerated filer¨
[  ]
Non-accelerated filer¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) [  ]Smaller reporting company [X]
 xEmerging growth company [  ]

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. [  ]

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

Title of each class of

securities to be registered

 

Proposed

maximum

aggregate

offering price

 Amount of
registration fee(1)

Units, consisting of Common Stock (par value $0.001 per share)(2) and Warrants to purchase Common Stock

    

Common Stock included in the Units

    

Warrants included in the Units

   (3)

Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of Warrants included in the Units(4)

   (3)

Placement Agent Warrants

    

Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of Placement Agent Warrants(4)

    

Total

 $3,000,000 $348.30
 
 
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered Amount to be registered(1)  Proposed maximum offering price per share(2)  Proposed maximum aggregate offering price  Amount of registration fee 
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share(3)  115,000,000  $0.005  $575,000  $

62.73

 

 

(1)

CalculatedRepresents up to 115,000,000 shares of common stock of RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”), $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”) to be sold to White Lion Capital, LLC pursuant to Rule 457(o) on the basis of the maximum aggregate offering price of all of the securities to be registered. In no event will the aggregate offering price of all securities issued in the offering pursuant to this registration statement exceed $3,000,000, inclusive of any exercise price thereof.

a put right granted under an equity purchase agreement dated July 28, 2020.
(2)

SharesEstimated solely for the purpose of our common stock being registered hereunder are accompanied by our preferred stock purchase rights described incalculating the Rights Agreement dated February 8, 2002,registration fee under Rule 457(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended to date, between us(the “Securities Act”), based on the average of the high and Americanlow price per share for the Company’s Common Stock Transfer & Trust Companyon October 7, 2020, as rights agent. Untilreported by the occurrence of certain prescribed events, such rights are not exercisable, are evidenced by each certificate for our common stock and will be transferred along and only with our common stock.OTC Markets Group.

(3)

No fee required pursuant to Rule 457(g).

(4)

Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act, the shares of 1933, this registration statementCommon Stock registered hereby also coversinclude an indeterminate number of additional shares of common stockCommon Stock as may from time to time become issuable upon the exercise of the warrants to purchase shares of our common stock and the placement agent warrants as a resultby reason of stock splits,split, stock dividends, recapitalizations, or other similar events.

transactions.

 

THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OFThe registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A)as amended, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.may determine.

 

 


The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be subject to change.changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities, in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUSSUBJECT TO COMPLETIONDATE : October 13, 2020

Subject to Completion, Dated January 20, 2011

Prospectus

LOGO

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Units

Each Consisting of

115,000,000 Shares of Common Stock

and

Warrants to purchaseShares of Common Stock

 

RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.

 

We are offering

This prospectus relates to the resale of up tounits, each unit consisting of 115,000,000 shares of our common stock, andwarrants$0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), issuable to White Lion Capital, LLC (the “Selling Stockholder”), pursuant to a “put right” under an equity purchase agreement, dated July 28, 2020, by and between us and the Selling Stockholder (the “Purchase Agreement”). The Purchase Agreement permits us to “put” up to $2,000,000 in shares of Common Stock to the Selling Stockholder under certain circumstances over a period of time expiring on June 30, 2021, unless earlier terminated by the Selling Stockholder’s purchase of all shares of Common Stock issuable under the Purchase Agreement or the termination of the Purchase Agreement. The purchase price per share to be paid by the Selling Stockholder is equal to 85% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of Common Stock for the five trading days prior to the date that is five trading days after the entire trading day that the Selling Stockholder holds the purchased shares in its brokerage account and is eligible to trade the shares.

The Selling Stockholder may sell all or a portion of the shares being offered pursuant to this prospectus at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at varying prices or at negotiated prices.

The Selling Stockholder is an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Additionally, any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by the broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.

Our Common Stock is quoted by the OTCQB Venture Market operated by the OTC Markets Group, Inc. (“OTCQB”) under the symbol “RSPI.” On October 7, 2020, the closing price of our Common Stock was 0.005 per share.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of our Common Stock by the Selling Stockholder. However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock. SubjectCommon Stock pursuant to certain ownership limitations, each warrant entitles the holder to purchaseshares of our common stock at an exercise price of $per share. The units will not be issued or certificated. The units will separate immediately and the common stock and warrants will be issued separately and will trade separately. We are not required to sell any specific dollar amount or number of units, but will use our best efforts to sell all of the units being offered. This prospectus also relatesput right offered by the Selling Stockholder. We will pay for expenses of this offering, except that the Selling Stockholder will pay any broker discounts or commissions or equivalent expenses or expenses of its legal counsel applicable to the warrants issuable to the placement agent as described below and to the sharessale of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of those warrants.

You should read this prospectus and any prospectus supplement carefully before you invest. This prospectus contains information you should consider when making your investment decision.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “CORX.OB”. On January 19, 2011, the last reported closing sale price of our common stock was $0.18 per share. We do not intend to apply for listing the warrants on any securities exchange.its shares.

 

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk FactorsYou should review carefully the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page 47 of this prospectus, for certain risks you should consider before purchasingand under similar headings in any securities.amendments or supplements to this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined ifpassed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus is truthful or complete.prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

has agreed to act as our exclusive placement agent in connection with this offering. In addition, the placement agent may engage one or more sub placement agents or selected dealers. The placement agent is not purchasing the securities offered by us, and is not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of units, but will assist us in this offering on a reasonable “best efforts” basis. We have agreed to pay the placement agent a cash fee equal to% of the gross proceeds of the offering of units. In addition, we have agreed to issue to the placement agent, or its designees, warrants exercisable for an aggregate ofpercent of the units issued in this offering. We estimate the total expenses of this offering, excluding the placement agent fees, will be approximately $. Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to closing in this offering, the actual public offering amount, placement agent fees, and proceeds to us, if any, are not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the total maximum offering amounts set forth above. See “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 59 of this prospectus for more information on this offering and the placement agent arrangements.

   Per
Unit
   Maximum
Offering Amount
 

Public offering price

  $     $3,000,000  

Placement Agent fees

  $     $   

Proceeds, before expenses, to us

  $     $   

The closing of this offering is subject to certain conditions. We expect that delivery of the units being offered pursuant to this prospectus will be made to purchasers on or about, 2011, against payment in immediately available funds.

The date of this prospectus is, 2011.2020


TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

 

Page

PROSPECTUS SUMMARYProspectus Summary

1
SUMMARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA6

SUMMARY OF THE OFFERINGRisk Factors

27

RISK FACTORSCAUTIONARY Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

418

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSUse of Proceeds

1119

USE OF PROCEEDSDilution

1120

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSMarket for common Equity and Dividend Policy

1221

CAPITALIZATIONThe Offering

1322

DILUTIONSelling Stockholder

1423

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSPlan of Distribution

1524

BUSINESS

27

MANAGEMENT

39

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

44

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

53

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

55

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES WE ARE OFFERINGSecurities

5626

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

59

LEGAL MATTERS

6328

EXPERTS

28
THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY29
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations44
directors and executive officers53
Executive Compensation57
Related Party Transactions59
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners AND Management61
Where You Can Find More Information63

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

63

INDEX TOIndex to Consolidated FINANCIAL STATEMENTS and Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

F-1

 

This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should rely only rely on the information contained in this prospectus or to which weprospectus. We have referred you. Neithernot, and the Company nor the placement agentSelling Stockholder has not, authorized anyone to provide you with any information or to make any representation on behalf of Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that is different fromother than that contained in this prospectus. You should not rely onWe take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any unauthorizedother information or representation.that others may give you. This prospectus is an offer to sellmay only the securities offered by this prospectus under the circumstances and in jurisdictionsbe used where it is lawfullegal to do so.offer and sell our securities. The information in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the datetime of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of any sales of theseour securities. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date. We are not, and the dateSelling Stockholder is not, making an offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.

For investors outside the United States: We have not and the Selling Stockholder has not done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus. This prospectus may be used only in jurisdictions were itany jurisdiction where action for that purpose is legal to sell these securities.required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of the securities and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States.

This prospectus includes statistical and other industry and market data that we obtained from industry publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. Industry publications and third-party research, surveys and studies generally indicate that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. We believe that the data obtained from these industry publications and third-party research, surveys and studies are reliable. We are not making any representation to you regarding the legality of an investmentultimately responsible for all disclosure included in the securities offered hereby under applicable law. this prospectus.

You should consult with your own legal advisors as torely only on the legal, tax, business, financial and related aspect of a purchase of such securities.

Industry and Market Data

Unless otherwise indicated, the market data and certain other statistical information used throughout this prospectus are based on independent industry publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or other published independent sources. Although we believe these third-party sources are reliable, we have not independently verified the information. None of the sources citedcontained in this prospectus, has consentedas supplemented and amended. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different. This prospectus may only be used where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in this prospectus may only be accurate on the inclusion of any data from its reports, nor have we sought their consent. In addition, some data are based on our good faith estimates. Such estimates are derived from publicly available information released by independent industry analysts and third-party sources, as well as our own management’s experience in the industry, and are based on assumptions made by us based on such data and our knowledge of such industry and markets, which we believe to be reasonable. However, none of our estimates have been verified by any independent source. Our estimates and assumptions involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed in the “Risk Factors” sectiondate of this prospectus and the other information contained herein. These and other factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates and assumptions.

prospectus.

 

iWe urge you to read carefully this prospectus, as supplemented and amended, before deciding whether to invest in any of the securities being offered.


i

PROSPECTUS SUMMARYProspectus Summary

About This Prospectus

This summary highlights the information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Because this is only a summary, itprospectus and does not contain all of the information that you should consider before buying thein making your investment decision. Before investing in our securities, of the Company. Youyou should carefully read thethis entire prospectus, carefully, especiallyincluding our financial statements and the sections entitled “Caution Regarding Forward Looking Statements,”related notes and the information set forth under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,Operations” in each case included elsewhere in this prospectus. Unless otherwise stated or the context requires otherwise, references in this prospectus to “RespireRx”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our” and similar references refer to RespireRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Pier Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Pier”).

Business Overview

The mission of the Company is to develop innovative and revolutionary treatments to combat disorders that are caused by disruption of neuronal signaling and that affect millions of people but for which there are few or poor treatment options.

To this end, we are developing a pipeline of new drug product candidates based on our broad patent portfolios for two drug platforms: (i) our cannabinoid platform (which we refer to as ResolutionRx), including dronabinol (a synthetic form of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (“Δ9-THC”)), which acts upon the nervous system’s endogenous cannabinoid receptors and (ii) our neuromodulators platform (which we refer to as EndeavourRx), which includes two programs: (a) AMPAkines, proprietary compounds that are positive allosteric modulators (“PAMs”) of AMPA-type glutamate receptors to promote neuronal function and (b) GABAkines, PAMs of the Type A gamma-amino-butyric acid (“GABAA) receptors, which program was recently established pursuant to our entry with the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Research Foundation, Inc., an affiliate of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (“UWMRF”), into a patent license agreement (the “UWMRF Patent License Agreement”).

In our cannabinoid platform, we are developing treatment options to address obstructive sleep apnea (“OSA”). In our AMPAkine program, we are developing patient treatment options for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”), spinal cord injury (“SCI”), Autism Spectrum Disorder (“ASD”), and certain neurological orphan diseases such as Fragile X Syndrome (“FXS”). With the addition of the GABAkine program, we are developing therapeutic options for treatment-resistant epilepsy and other convulsant disorders, and potentially migraine, inflammatory, neuropathic pain, and other central nervous system (“CNS”) driven disorders. At this time, due to insufficient funding, we do not have any active clinical trials and our development operations are limited to planning activities.

Recent Developments

We are assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our discovery, research and clinical programs, including impacts on their expected timelines and costs. Because we are not actively pursuing any clinical trials at this time due to insufficient funding, the pandemic has not impacted our operations; however, if we are able to secure financing from our exercise of our put right to the Selling Stockholder or otherwise and can proceed with activity under our programs, these impacts could ultimately be severe. On March 18, 2020 and July 2, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued updated industry guidance for conducting clinical trials, in which the FDA emphasized that safety of trial participants is critically important. This guidance may lead to the implementation of additional protocols such as COVID-19 screening procedures, resulting in potential delays and additional costs. The risks, strategic and operational challenges and costs of conducting such trials as a result of the global pandemic have exacerbated an already challenging clinical trial process. See “Risk Factors” for more information regarding the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and operations. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock, and as of September 30, 2020, there were 577,842,003 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. Additionally, the Company is obligated to reserve from its authorized shares of Common Stock: (i) a multiple of the number of shares of Common Stock into which certain of its promissory notes, preferred stock, and warrants are convertible or exercisable, as applicable; and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable under its equity plans. Given the number of shares of Common Stock that has been issued, and without obtaining waivers releasing the Company from certain of these share reserve obligations, there may be an insufficient number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance pursuant to the full purchase commitment under the Purchase Agreement or for issuance pursuant to future equity financings.

To address this potential insufficiency, the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) on September 14, 2020, authorized and recommended that the holders of Common Stock approve an increase in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 1,000,000,000 (1 billion) to 3,000,000,000 (3 billion). The Company intends to seek stockholder approval by calling for and holding a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders and engaging in a proxy solicitation process pursuant to section 14(a) of the Exchange Act.

Also, on September 14, 2020, the Board authorized and recommended that the holders of Series H Preferred Stock approve an increase in the number of authorized shares of Series H Preferred Stock from 1,200 (one thousand two-hundred) to 3,000 (three thousand) by amendment to the Certificate of Designation, Preferences, Rights and Limitations, Series H 2% Voting, Non-Participating, Convertible Preferred Stock (“Amendment”). On September 30, 2020, holders of all shares of Series H Preferred Stock approved such amendment by written consent. The Company filed the Amendment with the Secretary of State of Delaware on September 30, 2020.

Also, on September 14, 2020, the Board authorized the conversion of all shares of Series H Preferred Stock, upon request of the holders of the Series H Preferred Stock.

On September 30, 2020, each of Arnold S. Lippa, the Company’s Executive Chairman and Chief Scientific Officer and a director, and Jeff Eliot Margolis, the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary and a director, offered to forgive $100,000 and $150,000 respectively, of accrued compensation and related benefits accrued on or prior to September 30, 2020 in exchange for 100 and 150 shares of Series H Preferred Stock, respectively. On September 30, 2020, Timothy Jones, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and a director, offered to forgive $28,218 of accrued Board advisory fees and non-employee Board fees in exchange for 28.218 shares of Series H Preferred Stock. The Company accepted all such offers on September 30, 2020, and entered into exchange agreements with each of these individuals related thereto. Arnold S. Lippa and Jeff Eliot Margolis transferred their newly received Series H Preferred Stock to their respective family trusts. On September 30, 2020, the trusts converted all of their Series H Preferred Stock, inclusive of 4.8277778 shares of Series H Preferred Stock representing accrued but unpaid dividends, into 211,691,840 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 211,691,840 shares of Common Stock. On September 30, 2020, Timothy Jones converted all of his Series H Preferred Stock into 4,409,063 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 4,409,063 shares of Common Stock.

On September 30, 2020, the Company entered into exchange agreements with two vendors pursuant to which the Company settled certain accounts payable and accrued expense payment obligations with Series H Preferred Stock in lieu of cash. In the aggregate $241,109 of liabilities were settled with the issuance of 241.10948 shares of Series H Preferred Stock issued directly to designees of such vendors. On September 30, 2020, the designees of such vendors converted their Series H Preferred Stock into 37,673,357 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 37,673,357 shares of Common Stock.

On September 30, 2020, all holders of Series H Preferred Stock, including the designees noted above, Timothy Jones and the four trusts of Arnold S. Lippa and Jeff Eliot Margolis described above, converted all of their Series H Preferred Stock into an aggregate of 253,774,260 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 253,774,260 shares of Common Stock.

On September 30, 2020, the Company received affirmative written confirmations from holders (each, a “Noteholder”) of several of the Company’s outstanding convertible notes and related warrants of their agreement to waive, until November 25, 2020, share reserve requirements under the notes and warrants. As of September 30, 2020, taking into account the waivers and the transactions effected on that date, the Company was required to reserve 251,011,042 shares of its authorized and unissued Common Stock with respect to such notes and warrants that were not subject to such waivers and after reserving for outstanding options and other outstanding warrants, and had 422,157,977 shares of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, including 87,036,986 authorized, unissued and unreserved shares of Common Stock available. The waivers were necessary to permit the issuances of the Series H Preferred Stock and the Series H Preferred Stock conversions and warrant exercises discussed above.

Risks Associated with Our Business

Our business is subject to many risks, as more fully described in the section titled “Risk Factors” immediately following this prospectus summary. You should read and carefully consider these risks, together with ourthe risks set forth under the section titled “Risk Factors” and all of the other information in this prospectus, including the financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus, before deciding whether to purchaseinvest in our securities. If any securities of the Company.

Unless we state otherwise or the context indicates otherwise, references to “Cortex,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”risks discussed in this prospectus referactually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially and adversely affected. In particular, such risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

Our business is subject to risks arising from epidemic diseases, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a result of our current negative net worth, lack of cash and other liquid resources, the magnitude of our liabilities and the difficulties we have historically experienced raising capital, we and our auditors have expressed substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a “going concern.”
Our independent registered public accounting firm has identified material weaknesses in our financial reporting process.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders and restrict our operations.
We have received temporary waivers of certain of the Common Stock reserve requirements associated with certain of our convertible notes and certain related warrants.  As described above in the section titled “Recent Developments,” such waivers are necessary to ensure that we do not default on those notes or the terms of such warrants while we are seeking to increase the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock.  If we breach the contractual reserve requirements we will be in default of our contractual obligations, which may have material adverse consequences and may make it more difficult to raise additional necessary capital.
Our success, at least in part, will be dependent upon the strength of our intellectual property, including, but not limited to licensed and owned patents, patent applications, continuations-in-part, provisional patent applications, know-how, trade secrets and other forms of intellectual property. The issuance of patents with relevant claims is subject to varying degrees of uncertainty. Our ability to defend our intellectual property or challenge third party intellectual property infringement claims is expensive, time-consuming and uncertain. If our patent applications do not issue with relevant claims or if we cannot defend our patents, or, as appropriate, challenge interfering patents or actions of third parties, or otherwise maintain our intellectual property, our business and operations will be adversely affected.
Our success may be dependent upon our ability to enter into strategic alliances with larger companies in our industry or with companies that have specific expertise.  We may not be able to enter into such alliances on terms acceptable to us and our inability to do so would have a material adverse effect on our business.
The markets for our product candidates are highly competitive and are subject to change due to scientific advancements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
One of our product candidates is based, at least in part, on the development of one or more new formulations and the repurposing of an approved drug, the development of which is inherently risky while others of our product candidates have never been approved for marketing by any regulatory bodies and are subject to substantial research and development risks. Concerns about the safety and efficacy of our product candidates could limit our future success.
Clinical trials required for our product candidates are expensive and time-consuming, and their outcome is highly uncertain. If we are able to commence our planned clinical trials and any of those clinical trials are delayed or yield unfavorable results, we may have to delay application for or may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for the marketing of our product candidates.
Due to our reliance on third parties to conduct clinical trials on our behalf, we are unable to directly control the timing, conduct, expense and quality of our clinical trials, which could adversely affect our clinical data and results and related regulatory approvals.
Our Common Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange and is considered a “penny stock,” with a low market capitalization, all of which makes it more difficult for our stock to trade in the financial markets, for research analysts at securities brokerage firms to write research reports about us, for investment banks to contract with us for services, and ultimately making it difficult for us to obtain necessary capital required to execute our business plan, which could restrict our ability to continue as a going concern and to grow.

Regulatory and legal uncertainties could result in significant costs or otherwise harm our business.
Our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders have substantial control over us and could limit stockholders’ ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including changes of control.

Implications of Being a Smaller Reporting Company

We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and have elected to take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosure available to smaller reporting companies.

Corporate History

The Company was formed in 1987 under the name Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

About Cortex Pharmaceuticals

We are engaged to engage in the discovery, development and developmentcommercialization of innovative pharmaceuticals for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, neurological diseases and sleep apnea. Our primary focus is to develop novel small molecule compounds that positively modulate AMPA-type glutamate receptors, a complex of proteins that is involved in communication between nerve cells in the mammalian brain. We are developing a family of proprietary pharmaceuticals known as AMPAKINE® compounds, which enhance the activity of this receptor. We believe that AMPAKINE compounds hold promise for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric diseasesdisorders. On December 16, 2015, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended to date, our “Certificate of Incorporation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to change its name from Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.

In August 2012, the Company acquired Pier Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Pier”), which is now a wholly owned subsidiary. Pier was a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company developing a pharmacologic treatment for OSA and disorders that are known, or thought, to involve depressed functioning of pathwayshad been engaged, in the brain that use glutamate as a neurotransmitter. Our most advanced clinical compound is CX1739, which currently is in Phase II clinical development.

The AMPAKINE platform addresses large potential markets. Our business plan involves partnering with larger pharmaceutical companies for research, development, clinical testing, manufacturing and global marketing of specific AMPAKINE compounds for those indications that require sizable, expensive Phase III clinical trials — and very large sales forces to achieve significant market penetration. At the same time, we plan to develop compounds internally for a selected set of indications, many of which will allow us to apply for “Orphan Drug” status. These indications typically require more modest investment in the development stages, follow a quicker regulatory path to approval, and involve a more concentrated and smaller sales force targeted at selected medical centers in the U.S. and Europe. If we are successful in the pursuit of this operating strategy, we may be in a position to contain our costs over the next few years, to maintain our focus on the research and earlyclinical development of novel pharmaceuticals (where we believe that we have the ability to compete) and eventually to participate more fully in the commercial development of AMPAKINE products in the United States.

In March 2010, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Biovail Laboratories International SRL, or Biovail. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, Biovail acquired our interests in CX717, CX1763, CX1942 and the injectable dosage form of CX1739, as well as certain of our other AMPAKINE compounds and related intellectual property for use in the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. In connection with the transaction, Biovail paid us a lump sum of $9,000,000 upon execution of the asset purchase agreement and an additional $1,000,000 upon completion of the specified transfer plan in September 2010.

As part of the transaction, Biovail licensed back to us certain exclusive and irrevocable rights to some acquired AMPAKINE compounds, other than CX717, an injectable dosage form of CX1739, CX1763 and CX1942, for use outside of the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. Accordingly, following the transaction with Biovail, we retain rights for the majority of patented compounds in our AMPAKINE drug library, as well as all rights to the non-acquired AMPAKINE compounds for the treatment of neurological diseases and psychiatric disorders that have historically been a focus of our portfolio. Additionally, we retain our rights to develop and commercialize AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders, including an oral dosage form of CX1739. In September 2010, Biovail merged with Valeantactivities which are now being conducted by RespireRx Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., or Valeant. As a result of the merger and changes in strategic directions for the combined company, Valeant announced its intent to exit several therapeutic development programs, including the respiratory depression project acquired from us. We are in discussions with Valeant regarding the future of the project and under our agreement with Biovail, all contractual obligations remain in place.

Pier’s parent company.

For a more complete description of our business, please see “Business,” beginning on page 27.

An investment in the securities of the Company is speculative and involves substantial risks. You should read the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus for a discussion of certain factors to consider carefully before deciding to invest in the securities of the Company.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 15241 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, California 92618, and ourcorporate mailing address is 126 Valley Road, Suite C, Glen Rock, NJ 07452. Our telephone number is (949) 727-3157. Our(201) 444-4947, and our website is http://www.cortexpharm.com.

www.respirerx.com. The contents ofinformation on our website areis not part of this prospectus. The information contained in or connected to our website is not incorporated by reference into, and should not be considered part of, this prospectus. Any information about us on LinkedIn, Twitter or other social media platforms should not be considered part of this prospectus, nor should any information about us posted by others on blogs, bulletin boards, in chat rooms or in similar media.

SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING

The RespireRx logo and certain trademarks of RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. of or relating to any of its product candidates or program and platform names appearing in this prospectus are our property.

Offering Summary

 

Common Stock offered by the Selling Stockholder

Securities Offered:

Up tounits. Each unit will consist of 115,000,000 shares of our common stock andwarrantsCommon Stock, issuable to purchase upthe Selling Stockholder pursuant toshares of our common stock. a put right under the Purchase Agreement

Description of Warrants:

Common Stock outstanding before this offering (1)
577,842,003 shares
 The warrants will be exercisable at any time after the date of issuance and ending on theanniversary of the issuance date at an exercise price of $per share. This prospectus also relates to the offering of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants.

Common stock outstanding prior to this offering:

78,858,197 shares.

Common stockStock to be outstanding immediately after this offering:offering (1)(2)

692,842,003 shares

 shares.

Use of proceeds:

proceeds
The netWe are not selling any shares of Common Stock in this offering and, as a result, will not receive any proceeds from this offering, although we will be addedreceive proceeds from the sale of shares of our Common Stock pursuant to our working capital and used to accelerateexercise of the development of our AMPAKINE technology, licensing activities, working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. Please seeput right offered by the Selling Stockholder under the Purchase Agreement. See “Use of Proceeds” on page 11.19.

Risk Factors:

Terms of the Offering
The Selling Stockholder will determine when and how it will sell the Common Stock offered in this prospectus
 
An investmentTermination of the OfferingThe offering will conclude upon such time as all of the Common Stock offered in our securitiesthis prospectus has been sold or the offering is speculative and involves substantial risks. earlier terminated pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.
Risk FactorsYou should read the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus beginning on page 47 for a discussion of factors to consider carefully before deciding to invest in our securities.securities

OTC Bulletin Board Symbol:

OTCQB symbol
CORX.OB“RSPI”

(1) The number of shares of our common stock that will beCommon Stock outstanding immediatelybefore and after thethis offering is based on 78,858,197577,842,003 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of September 30, 2010. Unless we specifically state otherwise, the share information in this prospectus excludes:2020, and excludes, as of such date:

12,553,089 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding prior to this offering under our equity incentive plans, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.32 per share;

2,897,178 shares of common stock available for future grants under our equity incentive plans;

350,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding prior to this offering granted outside of our equity incentive plans, at a weighted average exercise price of $2.59 per share;

3,679 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock, at a conversion price of $6.795 per share;

24,126,952 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding prior to this offering, at a weighted average exercise price of $0.74 per share;

 

 

71,660,938 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants to be issued to purchasers in this offering,outstanding stock options at ana weighted average exercise price of $$0.19695 per share;

87,033,715 additional shares of Common Stock reserved and available for future issuances under our equity plans;
288,093,580 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrants at a weighted average exercise price of $0.01474 per share;
47,239,857 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of convertible promissory notes at a weighted average exercise price of $0.01052 per share; and

11 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock convertible at $2,208.375 per share of Common Stock plus 6,497 shares identified as “Pier Contingent Shares”.

(2) Assumes 115,000,000 shares of Common Stock sold to the Selling Stockholder upon the Company’s exercise of its put option under the Purchase Agreement.

Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes no exercise of the outstanding options or warrants or the conversion of the outstanding convertible notes or convertible preferred stock.

Summary Condensed Consolidated Financial Data

The following summary historical condensed consolidated financial information is derived from our condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements, including the accompanying notes thereto, beginning on page F-1. Our historical results for any period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any other period, including the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. You should read this information together with the sections titled “Capitalization”, “Dilution” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Summary of Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

  Six-months ended  Year ended 
  June 30,  December 31, 
  2020  2019  2019  2018 
Operating expenses:                
General and administrative $829,019  $594,904  $1,137,175  $1,488,238 
Research and development  308,466   297,350   599,329   688,286 
Total operating expenses  1,137,485   892,254   1,736,504   2,176,524 
Loss from operations  (1,137,485)  (892,254)  (1,736,504)  (2,176,524)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other liabilities in exchange for equity  (323,996)  -   -   (166,382)
Interest expense  (331,316)  (151,645)  (404,661)  (136,243)
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)  29,942   26,354   26,132   (112,641)
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(1,762,855) $(1,017,545) $(2,115,033) $(2,591,790)
                 
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.04) $(0.26) $(0.54) $(0.77)
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  49,320,761   3,872,076   3,908,479   3,351,105 

Summary Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Information

  June 30, 2020  December 31, 2019 
  (unaudited)    
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $1,492  $16,690 
Prepaid expenses  84,191   28,638 
         
Total current assets  85,683   45,328 
         
Total assets $85,683  $45,328 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including accrued compensation and related expenses $6,577,312  $5,855,871 
Notes payable  1,355,119   1,634,276 
         
Total current liabilities  7,932,431   7,490,147 
         
Stockholders’ deficiency:        
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; $0.6667 per share liquidation preference  21,703   21,703 
Common stock, $0.001 par value  222,307   4,175 
Additional paid-in capital  160,181,182   159,038,388 
Accumulated deficit  (168,271,940)  (166,509,085)
         
Total stockholders’ deficiency  (7,846,748)  (7,444,819)
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency $85,683  $45,328 

 6 

shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants to be issued to the placement agent in connection with this offering, at an exercise price of $per share.

RISK FACTORSRisk Factors

YourAny investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. YouInvestors should carefully consider the risks described below and all of the other information contained in this prospectus carefully before deciding whether to invest inpurchase our securities. IfOur business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by these risks if any of them actually occur. This prospectus also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the following risks actually occur,we face as described below and elsewhere in this prospectus.

Risks Related to the COVID-19 pandemic

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic may negatively impact our ability to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates and technologies and may ultimately affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, and governmental authorities around the world have implemented measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19. These measures have adversely affected workforces, customers, supply chains, consumer sentiment, economies, and financial markets, and, along with decreased consumer spending, have led to an economic downturn across many global economies. The COVID-19 pandemic rapidly escalated in the United States and continues to evolve, creating significant uncertainty and economic disruption, and leading to record levels of unemployment nationally. Numerous state and local jurisdictions had imposed, and those and others in the future may impose, shelter-in-place orders, quarantines, shut-downs of non-essential businesses, and similar government orders and restrictions on their residents to control the spread of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic and government responses thereto have made it very difficult to recruit clinical trial subjects and patients and to conduct clinical trials in general. We expect the life sciences industry and clinical trial activity to continue to face challenges arising from quarantines, site closures, travel limitations, interruptions to the supply chain for investigational products and other considerations if site personnel or trial subjects become infected with or are significantly at risk of contracting COVID-19. These challenges may lead to difficulties in meeting protocol-specified procedures. Further, in response to the public health emergency, the FDA issued guidance in March and July 2020 emphasizing that safety of trial participants is critically important. Decisions to continue or discontinue individual patients or the trial are expected to be made by trial sponsors in consultation with clinical investors and Institutional Review Boards, which may lead to the implementation of additional protocols such as COVID-19 screening procedures, resulting in potential delays and additional costs. The risks, strategic and operational challenges and costs of conducting such trials as a result of the global pandemic have exacerbated an already challenging clinical trial process, which may negatively impact our ability to plan or conduct trials if we secure sufficient financing to enable us to pursue such activity.

In addition, we expect to be impacted by the downturn in the U.S. economy, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to raise capital and our business operations.

The extent to which COVID-19 ultimately impacts our business, financial condition and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and unpredictable, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effectiveness of actions taken to contain the COVID-19 pandemic or treat its impact, among others. Additionally, the extent to which COVID-19 ultimately impacts our operations will depend on a number of factors, many of which will be outside of our control. The COVID-19 pandemic is evolving and new information emerges regularly; accordingly, the ultimate consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be predicted with certainty. In addition to the disruptions adversely impacting our business and financial results, they may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in these risk factors, including risks relating to our ability to begin to generate revenue, to generate positive cash flow, our relationships with third parties, and operating results couldmany other factors. We will attempt to minimize these impacts, but there can be harmed. Asno assurance that we will be successful in doing so.

7

Risks Related to Our Business and Our Need for Financing

Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a result,going concern.

In its audit opinion issued in connection with our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, our independent registered public accounting firm expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern given our limited working capital, recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2020 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the trading pricerealization of our common stockassets and the valuesatisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the securities offerednormal course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in existence. While we have relied principally in the past on external financing to provide liquidity and capital resources for our operations, we can provide no assurance that cash generated from our operations together with cash received in the future from external financing, if any, will be sufficient to enable us to continue as a going concern.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has identified material weaknesses in our financial reporting process.

At December 31, 2019, our independent registered public accounting firm identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully implement our plans to remediate the material weaknesses in our financial reporting process. Our failure to successfully implement our plans to remediate these material weaknesses could decline,cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, to produce timely and youreliable financial information, and to effectively prevent fraud. Additionally, such failure, or other weaknesses that we may experience in our financial reporting process or other internal controls, could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a part or all of your investment.negative impact on our financial condition and stock price.

Risks Related To Our Business

We have a history of net losses; we expect to continue to incur net losses and we may never achieve or maintain profitability.

Since our formation on February 10, 1987 through the end of our most recent fiscal quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2020, we have generated only modestminimal operating revenues and we have incurred net losses approximating $113,151,000.revenues. For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2020, our net incomeloss was approximately $2,613,000, due primarily to revenues from our March 2010 sale$1,762,855 and as of select AMPAKINE assets to Biovail. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, our net losses were approximately $8,441,000, $14,596,000, and $12,969,000, respectively. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2020, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $117,530,000.$168,271,940. We have not generated any revenue from product sales to date, we do not expect to generate revenue in the near term, and it is possible that we will never generate revenues from product sales in the future. Even if we do achieve significant revenues from product sales, we expect to continue to incur significant operatingnet losses over the next several years. As with other biopharmaceutical companies, in the biotechnology industry, it is possible that we will never achieve profitable operations.

We will need additional capital in the near term and the future and, if such capital is not available on terms acceptable to us or available to us at all, we may need to scale back our research and development efforts and may be unable to continue our business operations.

We require additional cash resources for basic operations and will require substantial additional funds to advance our research and development programs and to continue our operations, particularly if we decide to independently conduct later-stage clinical testing and apply for regulatory approval of any of our proposed products,product candidates, and if we decide to independently undertake the marketing and promotion of our products.product candidates if they are approved for commercialization. Additionally, we may require additional funds in the event that we decide to pursue strategic acquisitions of or licenses forto use other products or businesses. Based on our current operating plan, including planned clinical trials and other product research and development costs, we estimate that ourOur existing cash resources will not be sufficient to meet our requirements intofor the second quarterrest of 2011.2020. We believe that we will requirealso need additional capital in the near term to fund on-goingongoing operations, beyond that time.including basic operations. Additional funds may come from the sale of common equity, preferred equity, convertible preferred equity or equity-linked securities, debt, including debt convertible into equity, or may result from milestone payments related to our agreements with Les Laboratoires Servier,larger pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, biotechnology, specialty pharmaceutical, or Servier,other healthcare companies that include the license or rights to the technologies and Biovail, butproduct candidates that we are currently developing, although there is no assurance that we will receivesecure any such milestone payments within the desired timeframe,funding or if such payments will be receivedother transaction in a timely manner, or at all. Additional funds also mayAs a result, from the exercise of warrants to purchaseour outstanding shares of our common stock. AsCommon Stock may be significantly diluted and/or subject to senior rights of September 30, 2010, warrants to purchase up to approximately 24.1 million shares of our common stock were outstanding at exercise prices ranging from $0.21 to $3.96 per share. If these warrants are fully exercised, of which there can be no assurance, such exercise would provide approximately $17,800,000 of additional capital.preferred equity holders.

Our cash requirements in the future may differ significantly from our current estimates, depending on a number of factors, including:

 

the results of our clinical trials;

our ability to raise equity or debt capital, or our ability to obtain in-kind services which may be more difficult during the COVID-19 pandemic;
the results of any preclinical studies and clinical trials we may conduct;
the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals;
the costs of setting up and operating our own marketing and sales organization;
the ability to obtain funding under contractual and licensing agreements or grants;
the costs involved in obtaining and enforcing patents or engaging in litigation with third parties regarding intellectual property;
the costs involved in meeting our contractual obligations including employment agreements; and
our success in entering into collaborative relationships with other parties.

 

the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals;

the costs of setting up and operating our own marketing and sales organization;

the ability to obtain funding under contractual and licensing agreements;

the costs involved in obtaining and enforcing patents or any litigation by third parties regarding intellectual property; and

our success in entering into collaborative relationships with other parties.

To finance our future activities, we may seek funds through additional rounds of financing, including private or public equity or debt offerings and collaborative arrangements with corporate partners. We may also seek to exchange or restructure some of our outstanding securities to provide liquidity, strengthen our balance sheet and provide flexibility. We cannot say with any certainty that these measures will be successful, or that we will be able to obtain the additional needed funds on reasonable terms, or at all. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional and possibly substantial dilution to our stockholders. If we issued preferred equity or debt securities, these securities could have rights superior to holders of our common stock,Common Stock, and such instruments entered into in connection with the issuance of securities could contain covenants that will restrict our operations. We might have to obtain funds or in-kind services through arrangements with collaborative partners or others that may require us to relinquish certain or all rights to certain of our technologies, product candidates or products that we otherwise would not relinquish. As previously announced, in early March 2009, we reduced our workforce in an effort to conserve our capital resources. If adequate funds are not available in the future, as required, we could lose our key employees and might have to further delay, scale back or eliminate one or more of our research and development programs, which would impair our future prospects. In addition, we may be unable to meet our research spending obligations under our existing licensing agreements and may be unable to continue our business operations.

Common Stock reserve requirements may restrict our ability to raise capital and continue to operate our business

Common Stock reserve requirements may restrict our ability to raise capital and continue to operate our business. We have received temporary waivers of certain of the Common Stock reserve requirements associated with certain of our convertible notes and certain related warrants. These waivers are necessary to ensure that we do not default on such notes or the terms of such warrants while we are seeking to increase the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock. As of September 30, 2020 taking into account the waivers and the transactions effected on that date, the Company was required to reserve 251,011,042 shares of its authorized and unissued Common Stock with respect to such notes and warrants that were not subject to such waivers and after reserving for outstanding options and other outstanding warrants, and had 422,157,997 shares of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, including 87,036,986 authorized, unissued and unreserved shares of Common Stock available. If we breach the contractual reserve requirements we will be in default of such contractual obligations which may have material adverse consequences which may make it more difficult to raise additional necessary capital.

Our productsproduct opportunities rely on licenses from research institutions and if we lose access to these technologies or applications, our business wouldcould be substantially impaired.

Under

Through our agreements with The Regentsacquisition of Pier, we gained access to a pre-existing relationship between Pier and the University of California, we haveIllinois at Chicago (the “UIC”). Effective in September 2014, the Company entered into an exclusive license agreement (the “UIC License Agreement”) with the UIC, which gave the Company certain exclusive rights with respect to AMPAKINE compounds for allcertain patents and patent applications for which the University has patent rights, other than endocrine modulation and except for Biovail’s limited rights described below.

In connection with our March 2010 transaction with Biovail, we consented to The Regents of the University of California providing Biovail a non-exclusive license to the University’s patent rights for AMPAKINE compounds for use in the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease.

Under a patent license agreement with The Governors of the University of Alberta, we had exclusive rights toUnited States and other countries claiming the use of AMPAKINE compoundsdronabinol and other cannabinoids for the treatment of sleep-related breathing disorders, including sleep apnea. The UIC License Agreement obligates the Company to preventcomply with various commercialization and treat respiratory depression induced by opiate analgesics, barbituratesreporting requirements and anesthetic and sedative agents. In connection with our transaction with Biovail, we assigned our rights under our patent license agreement with the University of Alberta to Biovail. However, we retained our ability to continue to pursue AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders.

Our rights to certain of the AMPAKINE compounds are secured by patents or patent applications owned wholly by The Regents of the University of California or by the University as a co-owner with us. Our existing agreements with The Regents of the University of California require the University to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain patent applications related to our licensed rights at our expense. Such agreements also require us to make certain minimum annualvarious royalty payments, meet certain milestones or diligently seek to commercialize the underlying technology.

Under such agreements, we are required to make minimumincluding potential one-time and annual royalty payments, as well as payments upon the achievement of approximately $70,000. Separately,certain development milestones.

The Company and UWMRF executed the UWMRF Patent License Agreement effective August 1, 2020 pursuant to which RespireRx licensed the intellectual property identified therein, including with respect to GABAkines. In consideration for the licenses granted, the Company will pay to UWMRF patent filing and prosecution costs, annual license maintenance fees, one-time milestone payments, and annual royalties.

If we are requiredunable to spend a minimum of $250,000 per year to advancecomply with the AMPAKINE compounds until we begin marketing an AMPAKINE compound. The commercialization efforts in the agreements require us to file for regulatory approval of an AMPAKINE compound before October 2012.

Although we currently are in compliance with our obligations under the agreements with The Regents of the University of California, including minimum annual payments and diligence milestones, our failure to meet anyterms of these requirements could allow the University to terminate that particular agreement. Management believes that it maintains a strong relationship with The Regents of the University of California.

licenses, such as required payments thereunder, these licenses might be terminated.

9

We are at an early stage of development and we may not be able to successfully develop and commercialize our productsproduct candidates and technologies.

The development of AMPAKINE productsour product candidates is subject to the risks of failure commonly experienced in the development of products based upon innovative technologies and the expense and difficulty of obtaining approvals from regulatory agencies. Drug discovery and development is time consuming, expensive and unpredictable. On average, only one out of many thousands of chemical compounds discovered by researchers proves to be both medically effective and safe enough to become an approved medicine. In the fields that we target, approximately one in five compounds placed in clinical trials generally reaches the market. All of our proposed productsproduct candidates are in the preclinical or early clinicalto mid-clinical stage of development and although we have previously completed certain Phase 2 trials, and although we are planning for additional preclinical and clinical trials, including potentially an advanced-clinical stage trial, we do not have any currently active trials. Accordingly, we will require significant additional funding for research, development and clinical testing of our product candidates, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all, before we are able to submit them to any of the regulatory agencies for clearances for commercial use. Our trials that are subject to our collaborative research arrangements are being funded by third parties and do not involve financial commitments from us.

The process from discovery to development to regulatory approval can take several years and drug candidates can fail at any stage of the process. Late stage clinical trials often fail to replicate results achieved in earlier studies. Historically, in our industry more than half of all compounds in development failed during Phase II trials and 30% failed during Phase III trials. We cannot assure yoube certain that we will be able to successfully complete successfully any of our research and development activities.

Even if we do complete them,our research and development activities, we may not be able to successfully market successfully any of the productsproduct candidates or be able to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals or assure that healthcare providers and payors will accept our products.product candidates. We also face the risk that any or all of our productsproduct candidates will not work as intended or that they will be unsafe, or that, even if they do work and are safe, that our productsproduct candidates will be uneconomical to manufacture and market on a large scale. Due to the extended testing and regulatory review process required before we can obtain marketing clearance, we do not expect to be able to commercialize any therapeutic drug for several years, either directly or through our corporate partners or licensees.

We may not be able to enter into the strategic alliances necessary to fully develop and commercialize our productsproduct candidates and technologies, and we will be dependent on our corporatestrategic partners if we do.

In addition to our agreements with Servier and Biovail, we

We are seeking other pharmaceutical company and other strategic partners to develop otherparticipate with us in the development of major indications for the AMPAKINEour cannabinoid and neuromodulator compounds. These relationships may be structured as agreements that would potentially provide us with additional funds or in-kind services in exchange for exclusive or non-exclusive license or other rights to the technologies and products that we are currently developing. Competition between biopharmaceutical companies for these types of arrangements is intense. Although we have been engaged in discussions with candidate companies for some time, weWe cannot give any assurance that theseour discussions with candidate companies will result in an agreement or agreements in a timely manner, or at all. Additionally, we cannot assure you that any resulting agreement will generate sufficient revenues to offset our operating expenses and longer-term funding requirements.

If we are unable to maintain our relationships with academic consultants and the University of California, Irvine, our business could suffer.

We depend upon our relationships with academic consultants, particularly Dr. Gary S. Lynch of the University of California, Irvine. In addition, we sponsored preclinical research in Dr. Lynch’s laboratories at the University of California, Irvine that is part of our product development and corporate partnering profile. If our relationship with Dr. Lynch or the University of California, Irvine, is disrupted, our AMPA- receptor research program could be adversely affected. The term of our consulting agreement with Dr. Lynch commenced in November 1987 and will continue until terminated by either party to the agreement upon at least 60 days’ prior written notice to the other party. Our agreements with our other consultants are generally also terminable by the consultant on short notice.

Risks Related to Our Industry

If we fail to secure adequate intellectual property protection, it could significantly harm our financial results and ability to compete.

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to get patent protection for our products and processes in the U.S. and elsewhere. We have filed and intend to continue to file patent applications as we need them. However, additional patents that may issue from any of these applications may not be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Also, any patents issued to us or licensed by us may be designed around or challenged by others, and if such challenge is successful, it may diminish our rights.

If we are unable to obtain sufficient protection of our proprietary rights in our products or processes prior to or after obtaining regulatory clearances, our competitors may be able to obtain regulatory clearance and market competing products by demonstrating the equivalency of their products to our products. If they are successful at demonstrating the equivalency between the products, our competitors would not have to conduct the same lengthy clinical tests that we have conducted.

We also rely on trade secrets and confidential information that we try to protect by entering into confidentiality agreements with other parties. Those confidentiality agreements may be breached, and our remedies may be insufficient to protect the confidential information. Further, our competitors may independently learn our trade secrets or develop similar or superior technologies. To the extent that our consultants, key employees or others apply technological information independently developed by them or by others to our projects, disputes may arise regarding the proprietary rights to such information. We cannot assure you that such disputes will be resolved in our favor.

We may not be subjectable to potential product liability claims. Onecompete with other biopharmaceutical or more successful claims brought against us could materially impactpharmaceutical companies in research, development or the marketing our business and financial condition.products.

The clinical testing, manufacturing and marketing of our products may expose us to product liability claims. We maintain liability insurance with coverage limits of $10 million per occurrence and $10 million in the annual aggregate. We have never been subject to a product liability claim, and we require each patient in our clinical trials to sign an informed consent agreement that describes the risks related to the trials, but we cannot assure you that the coverage limits of our insurance policies will be adequate or that one or more successful claims brought against us would not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and result of operations. Further, if one of our AMPAKINE compounds is approved by the FDA for marketing, we cannot assure you that adequate product liability insurance will be available, or if available, that it will be available at a reasonable cost. Any adverse outcome resulting from a product liability claim could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face intense competition that could result in products that are superior to the products that we are developing.

Our businessThe pharmaceutical industry is characterized by intensive research efforts.efforts, rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary therapeutics. Our competitors include many companies, research institutes and universities that are working in a number of pharmaceutical or biotechnology disciplines to develop therapeutic products similar to those we are currently investigating. Most of these competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, distribution or other resources than we do. In addition, many of our competitors have experience in performing human clinical trials of new or improved therapeutic products and obtaining approvals from the FDA and other regulatory agencies. We have no experience in conducting and managing later-stage clinical testing or in preparing applications necessary to obtain regulatory approvals. We expect that competition in this field will continue to intensify.

Our patents and patent applications do not cover the entire world, thus limiting the potential exclusive commercialization of our products to those countries in which we have intellectual property protection. We are aware of at least one company that may be developing a product or product similar to one of our prospective products for our proposed indication in countries where we do not have intellectual property protection. Such company or companies may choose to compete with us in countries where we do have intellectual property protection and cause us to expend resources defending our intellectual property. A liberal regulatory environment or unenforced or poorly enforced regulations may encourage competition from non-drug products such as medical marijuana or dietary supplements and similar products containing cannabis-derived molecules making claims that would be competitive with our proposed regulatory-approved claims. Since our target markets are very large, there is a great deal of economic incentive for others to enter and compete in those markets. We must compete with other companies with respect to their research and development efforts and for capital and other forms of funding. An inability to compete would have a material adverse impact on our business operations.

If our third-party manufacturers’ facilities do not follow current good manufacturing practices, our product development and commercialization efforts may be harmed.

There are a limited number of manufacturers that operate under the FDA’s and European Union’s good manufacturing practices regulations and are capable of manufacturing products like those we are developing. Third-party manufacturers may encounter difficulties in achieving quality control and quality assurance and may experience shortages of qualified personnel. A failure of third-party manufacturers to follow current good manufacturing practices or other regulatory requirements and to document their adherence to such practices may lead to significant delays in the availability of products for clinical study or commercial use, the termination of, or the placing of a hold on a clinical study, or may delay or prevent filing or approval of marketing applications for our product candidates. In addition, we could be subject to sanctions, including fines, injunctions and civil penalties. Changing manufacturers may require additional clinical trials and the revalidation of the manufacturing process and procedures in accordance with FDA-mandated current good manufacturing practices and would require FDA approval. This revalidation may be costly and time consuming. If we are unable to arrange for third-party manufacturing of our product candidates, or to do so on commercially reasonable terms, we may not be able to complete development or marketing of our product candidates.

We have announced a restructuring plan to facilitate the financing of our business initiatives. We may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits of our restructuring plan and the restructuring may adversely affect our business.

As further discussed in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this prospectus, the Company is considering an internal restructuring plan that contemplates spinning out our two drug platforms under ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx into separate operating businesses or subsidiaries. The intent of this restructuring is to facilitate financing of the programs and platforms underlying ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx, and to better align our human resources with our clinical development strategy.

Implementation of a restructuring plan is costly and disruptive to our business, and we may encounter unexpected costs while implementing the restructuring plan. Even if implemented, may not be successful in attracting the necessary sources of financing or recruiting the necessary human resources to achieve the intended results. As such, we may not be able to obtain the estimated benefits that are initially anticipated in connection with our restructuring in a timely manner or at all. We may need to undertake additional restructurings in the future. As a result of any restructuring, we may experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge and/or inefficiency during transitional periods and may lose momentum in the development of our product candidates. Additionally, reorganization and restructuring can require a significant amount of management and other employees’ time and focus, which may divert attention from operating and growing our business. Any failure to properly execute the restructuring plans could result in total costs that are greater than expected and cause us not to achieve the expected long-term operational benefits, and might adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and future operations.

11

Our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards will be subject to limitations upon a change in ownership, which could reduce our ability to use those loss carry forwards following any change in Company ownership.

Generally, a change of more than 50% in the ownership of a Company’s stock, by value, over a three-year period constitutes an ownership change for U.S. federal income tax purposes. An ownership change may limit our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards attributable to the period prior to such change. We have sold or otherwise issued shares of our Common Stock in various transactions sufficient to constitute an ownership change. As a result, if we earn net taxable income in the future, our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carry forwards to offset U.S. federal taxable income will be subject to limitations, which would restrict our ability to reduce future tax liability. Future shifts in our ownership, including transactions in which we may engage, may cause additional ownership changes, which could have the effect of imposing additional limitations on our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carry forwards.

We have not voluntarily implemented various corporate governance measures, in the absence of which stockholders may have more limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interests and similar matters.

We have not adopted any corporate governance measures, since our securities are not yet listed on a national securities exchange and we are not required to do so. We have not adopted corporate governance measures such as separate audit or other independent committees of our Board as we presently have only one independent director. If we expand our board membership in future periods to include additional independent directors, we may seek to establish an audit and other committees of our Board. It is possible that if our Board included additional independent directors and if we were to adopt some or all of these corporate governance measures, stockholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. For example, in the Pharmaceutical Researchabsence of audit, nominating and Manufacturerscompensation committees comprised of America recently estimatedat least a majority of independent directors, decisions concerning matters such as compensation packages to our senior officers and recommendations for director nominees may be made by a majority of directors who have an interest in the outcome of the matters being decided. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current lack of corporate governance measures in formulating their investment decisions.

Risks Related to this Offering

The Selling Stockholder will pay less than the then-prevailing market price for our Common Stock.

Our Common Stock to be sold to the Selling Stockholder pursuant to the Purchase Agreement will be purchased at a price equal to eighty-five percent (85%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price during a pricing period of five consecutive days after the entire trading day that the Selling Stockholder holds the purchased shares in its brokerage account and is eligible to trade the shares. The Selling Stockholder has a financial incentive to sell our Common Stock immediately upon receiving the shares to realize the profit equal to the difference between the discounted price and the market price. If the Selling Stockholder sells the shares, the price of our Common Stock could decrease. Regardless of whether our stock price decreases, the Selling Stockholder may continue to have incentive to sell the shares of our Common Stock that it holds, due to the ongoing discount. These sales may have a further impact on our stock price. If the price of our Common Stock falls to par value of $0.001 per share, we may be unable to utilize the put options and access the equity line.

12

We may not be able to access sufficient funds under the Purchase Agreement when needed.

Our ability to put shares to the Selling Stockholder and obtain funds under the Purchase Agreement is limited by the terms and conditions in the Purchase Agreement, including restrictions on when we may exercise our put rights, restrictions on the amount we may put to the Selling Stockholder at any one time, which is determined in part by the trading volume of our Common Stock, and a limitation on our ability to put shares to the Selling Stockholder to the extent that it would cause the Selling Stockholder to beneficially own more than 100 pharmaceutical4.99% of our outstanding shares. In addition, we do not expect the commitment under the Purchase Agreement to satisfy all of our funding needs, even if we are able and biotechnology companies are conducting researchchoose to take full advantage of the commitment.

Certain restrictions on the extent of put exercises and the delivery of advance notices may have little, if any, mitigating effect on the adverse impact resulting from of our issuance of shares in connection with the Purchase Agreement, and as such, the Selling Stockholder may sell a large number of shares, resulting in substantial dilution to the value of shares held by existing stockholders.

The Selling Stockholder has agreed, subject to certain exceptions listed in the fieldPurchase Agreement, to refrain from holding a number of neurological disorders, with over 25 drugs under clinical investigationshares which would result in the U.S.Selling Stockholder or its affiliates owning more than 4.99% of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock at any one time. These restrictions, however, do not prevent the Selling Stockholder from selling shares of our Common Stock received in connection with a put exercise, and then receiving additional shares of our Common Stock in connection with a subsequent put exercise. In this way, the Selling Stockholder could sell more than 4.99% of the outstanding Common Stock in a relatively short time frame while never holding more than 4.99% at one time.

Risks Related to the Trading and Ownership of our Common Stock and our Capital Structure

Our stock price is volatile and our Common Stock could decline in value.

Our Common Stock is currently quoted for public trading on the OTCQB Venture Market. The trading price of our Common Stock has been subject to wide fluctuations and may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, many of which will be beyond our control.

The market price of securities of life sciences companies in general has been very unpredictable. Broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs for us and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

The range of sales prices of our Common Stock for the period between January 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020 and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, as quoted on the OTCQB, was $0.0033 to $0.1499 and $0.0771 to $0.8500, respectively. The following factors, in addition to factors that affect the market generally, could significantly affect our business, and may cause volatility or a decline in the market price of our Common Stock:

competitors announcing technological innovations or new commercial products;
competitors’ publicity regarding actual or potential products under development;
regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;
legal developments regarding cannabinoids and cannabis products in the United States and foreign countries;
developments concerning proprietary rights, including patent litigation;
public concern over the safety of therapeutic products;
changes in healthcare reimbursement policies and healthcare regulations; and
future issuances and sales of our Common Stock, including pursuant to conversions of our outstanding convertible instruments and this offering.

At times, our Common Stock is thinly traded and you may be unable to sell some or all of your shares at the price you would like, or at all, and sales of large blocks of shares may depress the price of our Common Stock.

Our Common Stock has historically been sporadically or “thinly” traded, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing shares of our Common Stock at prevailing prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. Recently, our Common Stock has been more “broadly” traded, meaning that it has been trading in higher volumes; however, there can be no assurance that this attribute will continue. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in shares of our Common Stock is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer that has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. This could lead to wide fluctuations in our share price. You may be unable to sell our Common Stock at or above your purchase price, which may result in substantial losses to you. Also, as a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our stockholders may disproportionately influence the price of shares of our Common Stock in either direction. The price of shares of our Common Stock could, for example, decline precipitously in the event a large number of shares of our Common Stock are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer which could better absorb those sales with a lesser or no adverse impact on its share price.

Future sales could depress the market price for our Common Stock.

If we issue additional equity or equity-based securities, the number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding could increase substantially, which could substantially dilute the holdings of existing stockholders, adversely affect the prevailing market price of our Common Stock and make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of Common Stock.

As of September 30, 2020, we had 577,842,003 shares of our Common Stock outstanding, and we are registering the resale of up to 115,000,000 shares of Common Stock under the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. As of the date of this prospectus, none of the 115,000,000 shares are included in the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock as of September 30, 2020.

If all warrants and options outstanding as of September 30, 2020 were exercised prior to their respective expiration dates, up to 288,093,580 additional shares of our Common Stock could become freely tradable. As of September 30, 2020, there were remaining outstanding convertible notes totaling $538,224 inclusive of accrued interest. Of that amount, $497,009 was convertible into 47,239,857 shares of Common Stock and the remainder into an indeterminate number of shares of Common Stock as such notes may convert, at the option of each note holder, acting separately and independently of the other note holders, into the next exempt private securities offering of equity securities. As is referenced elsewhere in this filing, parties to which we have issued such convertible instruments include Power Up Lending Group Ltd., Crown Bridge Partners, LLC, FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund LLC, EMA Financial, LLC, and the Selling Stockholder.

14

A large percentage of the Company’s shares are held by a few stockholders, some of whom are affiliated with members of the Company’s management and our board of directors. As these principal stockholders substantially control the Company’s corporate actions, our other stockholders may face difficulty in exerting any influence over matters not supported by these principal stockholders.

The Company’s principal stockholders include (i) the Arnold Lippa Family Trust of 2007 (the “Lippa Trust”), (ii) the Jeff Eliot Margolis 2016 Trust, (iii) the Jeff Eliot Margolis Trust for the Benefit of Matthew Shane Margolis, (iv) Jeff Eliot Margolis Trust for the Benefit of Emily Alexa Margolis, (v) Dawn Gross Margolis 2016 Trust, (vi) Dawn Gross Margolis Trust for the Benefit of Matthew Shane Margolis, and (vii) Dawn Gross Margolis Trust for the Benefit of Emily Alexa Margolis (collectively, (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) and (vii) the “Margolis Trusts” and with the Lippa Trust, the “Trusts”). The trustee of the Margolis trusts is the spouse of Jeff E. Margolis. Mr. Margolis, the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, is affiliated with the Margolis Trusts and may be deemed to have an indirect beneficial ownership interest in the stock owned by the Trusts. Arnold S. Lippa is neither the trustee nor the beneficiary of the Lippa Trust. In addition, Timothy L. Jones, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and a director, owns 4,409,063 shares of Common Stock. As of September 30, 2020, these principal stockholders collectively owned 225,175,088 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase an additional 216,100,903 shares of Common Stock. These stockholders, acting individually or as a group, may be able to exert control or significant influence over matters such as electing directors, amending the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, or approving mergers or other business combinations or transactions. In addition, because of the percentage of ownership and voting concentration in these principal stockholders, elections of the directors on the Board may be within the control of these stockholders. While all of the Company’s stockholders are entitled to vote on matters submitted to the Company’s stockholders for approval, the concentration of shares and voting influence or control presently lies with these principal stockholders. As such, it would be difficult for stockholders to propose and have approved proposals not supported by these principal stockholders. There can be no assurance that matters voted upon by the Company’s officers and directors in their capacity as stockholders will be viewed favorably by all stockholders of the Company. The stock ownership of the Company’s principal stockholders may discourage a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock which, in turn, could reduce the Company’s stock price or prevent the Company’s stockholders from realizing a premium over the Company’s stock price.

Our Certificate of Incorporation, Series H Preferred Stock and other governing documents may prevent or delay an attempt by our stockholders to replace or remove management.

Certain provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of our business, even if such change in control would be beneficial to our stockholders. Our Certificate of Incorporation allows the Board to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with characteristics to be determined by the Board, without stockholder approval. The ability of our Board to issue additional preferred stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing an attempt by our stockholders to replace or remove existing directors and management.

Historically, warrants to purchase Common Stock have been issued as compensation for professional services, typically related to fund raising or in connection with the issuance of promissory notes.

In addition, certain executive officers, members of the Board and certain vendors have offered to forgive accrued compensation and other amounts due to them, and the Board accepted such offers in exchange for either shares of Common Stock, options to purchase Common Stock, or preferred stock convertible into Common Stock. Specifically, in fiscal year 2020, three officers and directors of the Company exchanged the right to receive payment of accrued compensation in return for shares of Common Stock and for shares of Series H 2% Voting, Non-Participating, Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series H Preferred Stock”), which entitles these officers to that number of votes equal to two times the number of Common Stock into which such holder’s Series H Preferred Stock would be convertible.

If executive officers offer and if the Board accepts such offers in the future, a significant number of shares of Common Stock or one or more options to purchase, or shares of preferred stock convertible into, a significant number of shares of Common Stock could be issued or granted. The ability of our Board to issue additional shares of Common Stock, options to purchase shares of Common Stock, warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock, or preferred stock convertible into Common Stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing an attempt by our stockholders to replace or remove existing directors and management.

Our Common Stock is deemed a “penny stock,” which a broker-dealer may find more difficult to trade and an investor may find more difficult to acquire or dispose of in the secondary market.

Our Common Stock is subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price per share of less than $5.00, subject to certain exceptions, such as any securities listed on a national securities exchange. For any transaction involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions. If our Common Stock remains a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our Common Stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our Common Stock on the secondary market. Recently, our Common Stock has been trading below a penny. Many broker-dealers do not accept for deposit shares of common stock that trade below a penny, and those that do accept such shares for deposit place limitations on the deposit or charge higher fees associated with the deposit, the transactions in the shares of common stock or with respect to the account in general. Taking these additional factors together, and investor may find it even more difficult to acquire or dispose of our Common Stock.

We may issue additional shares of our Common Stock, and investment in our company is likely to be subject to substantial dilution.

Investors’ interests in the Company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share when we issue additional shares, including pursuant to this offering. Dilution is the difference between what investors pay for their stock and the net tangible book value per share immediately after the additional shares are purchased. We are authorized to issue up to 1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock and our Board has authorized an increase to 3,000,000,000, subject to stockholder approval. Our financing activities in the past focused on convertible note financing that requires us to issue shares of Common Stock to satisfy principal, interest and any applicable penalties related to these convertible notes. When required under the terms and conditions of the convertible notes, we issue additional shares of Common Stock that have a dilutive effect on our stockholders. We anticipate that all or at least a substantial portion of our future funding, if any, will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our Common Stock and so any investment in the Company will likely be diluted, with a resulting decline in the value of our Common Stock.

Additional financing may not be available on terms acceptable to us, and our ability to raise capital through equity financing may be limited by the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock. In order to raise significant additional amounts from equity financing, we will need to seek stockholder approval to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock, and any such amendment would require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. If we are unable to obtain needed financing on acceptable terms, we may not be able to implement our business plan, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our Common Stock may be subject to removal from the OTC Markets OTCQB quotation service if our stock closes at a price below $0.01 for a period of 90 days.

Our Common Stock currently trades, and for a period in excess of 30 calendar days has traded, below $0.01 per share on the OTCQB Venture Market. To continue to meet the OTCQB Venture Market Standards for Continued Eligibility for OTCQB as per the OTCQB Standards, Section 2.3(2), our Common Stock must have a closing bid of $0.01 per share for more for 10 consecutive trading days. We have received an extension of time until November 25, 2020 to cure the deficiency. If we do not cure the deficiency, our Common Stock would no longer be eligible to trade on the OTCQB Venture Market. A downgrade to a lower OTC Pink market would likely have a material adverse impact on the trading of our Common Stock because fewer brokerage firms would be making markets in our Common Stock or eligible to transact business in our Common Stock. Stocks that trade on OTC Pink are often considered to be stocks of companies in financial distress, not current or less transparent in their financial reporting. Management believes that strategies are available to bring the Company’s stock price back into compliance, including potentially effectuating a reverse share split, although there is no assurance that any of those strategies will have the desired result.

Furthermore, we may not issue shares for consideration of less than par value of $0.001, and should the share price of our Common Stock fall below par value, our ability to exercise put options to the Selling Stockholder would be materially impacted, which could render the equity line unavailable to us and impact our operations.

Delaware law, our Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws provides for the indemnification of our officers and directors at our expense, and correspondingly limits their liability, which may result in a major cost to us and hurt the interests of our shareholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of officers and/or directors.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Company, as amended (the “Bylaws”) include provisions that eliminate the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. These provisions eliminate the personal liability of our directors and our shareholders for monetary damages arising out of any violation of a director of his fiduciary duty of due care, but do not affect a director’s liabilities under the federal securities laws or the recovery of damages by third parties.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on any investment in the shares of stock of our Company and any gain on an investment in our Company will need to come through an increase in our stock’s price, which may never happen.

We have never paid any cash dividends and currently do not intend to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. To the extent that we require additional funding currently not provided for, our funding sources may prohibit the payment of a dividend. Because we do not currently intend to declare dividends, any gain on an investment in our Company will need to come through an increase in our Common Stock’s price. This may never happen, and investors may lose all of their investment in our Company.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our Common Stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Costs and expenses of being a reporting company under the Exchange Act are substantial and prevent us from achieving profitability.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and aspects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to comprise a substantial portion of our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, and to make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, placing significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

There could be unidentified risks involved with an investment in our securities.

The foregoing risk factors are not a complete list or explanation of the risks involved with an investment in the securities. Additional risks will likely be experienced that are not presently foreseen by the Company. Prospective investors must not construe this the information provided herein as constituting investment, legal, tax or other professional advice. Before making any decision to invest in our securities, you should read this entire prospectus and consult with your own investment, legal, tax and other professional advisors. An investment in our securities is suitable only for investors who can assume the financial risks of an investment in the Company for an indefinite period of time and who can afford to lose their entire investment. The Company makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to the likelihood of the success or the business of the Company, the value of our securities, any financial returns that may be generated or any tax benefits or consequences that may result from an investment in the Company.

CAUTIONARY Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the following words: “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words, and such statements may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding (i) future research plans, expenditures and results, (ii) potential collaborative arrangements, (iii) the potential utility of the Company’s product candidates, (iv) reorganization plans, and (v) the need for, and availability of, additional financing. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time the statements are made and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this report.

These factors include but are not limited to, regulatory policies or changes thereto, available cash, research and development results, issuance of patents, competition from other similar businesses, interest of third parties in collaborations with us, and market and general economic factors, and other risk factors included under the caption “Risk Factors” starting on page 7 of this prospectus.

You should read the matters described in “Risk Factors” and the other cautionary statements made in this prospectus as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this prospectus. We cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this prospectus will prove to be accurate and therefore prospective investors are encouraged not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. You should read this prospectus completely. Other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future.

We caution investors not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement that speaks only as of the date made and to recognize that forward-looking statements are predictions of future results, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described under the caption “Risk Factors” of this prospectus, as well as others that we may consider immaterial or do not anticipate at this time. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions regarding the Company’s business and technology, which involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future scientific, economic, regulatory and competitive conditions, collaborations with third parties, and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not know whether our expectations will prove correct. Our expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions that we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties, including those described in the section titled “Risk Factors” of this prospectus. The risks and uncertainties described in that section are not exclusive and further information concerning us and our business, including factors that potentially could materially affect our financial results or condition, may emerge from time to time. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements. We advise investors to consult any further disclosures we may make on related subjects in our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K that we file with or furnish to the SEC.

18

Use of Proceeds

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our Common Stock by the Selling Stockholder. However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of shares of our Common Stock pursuant to our exercise of the put right offered by the Selling Stockholder under the Purchase Agreement.

Although the Purchase Agreement between the Company and the Selling Stockholder provides for an equity line of up to $2,000,000 of gross proceeds to the Company upon exercise of its put right, this registration statement registers the resale by the Selling Stockholder of only 115,000,000 shares of Common Stock. Assuming a price of $0.0039797, which is 85% of the lowest VWAP during the five-day period from October 1, 2020 to October 7, 2020 and sale of all of the 115,000,000 shares that would then be resold in this Offering, and taking into consideration the Company’s estimated expenses, the Company would achieve gross proceeds of approximately $450,000 and net proceeds of approximately $300,000. In order to make full use of the equity line, the Company expects it will need to file subsequent resale registration statements before it will be permitted to exercise its put rights under the Purchase Agreement.

The Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby on the following:

1.To manufacture, on a pilot scale, one or more new proprietary formulations of dronabinol with the enhanced properties described in our patent applications, for which we would spend approximately $150,000 to bench test in vitro several versions of dronabinol formulations in order to determine those with the best physico-chemical properties.
2.To initiate clinical testing of our AMPAkines in the treatment of SCI, approximately $145,000 would be utilized to assess the purity of our existing drug supplies and finalize a clinical trial protocol for a Phase 2A clinical trial to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic properties of one of our lead AMPAkines in patients who have had SCI. These tasks are critical for applying to the FDA for permission to amend our existing IND or initiate a new IND enabling the commencement of clinical trials.
3.Any remaining balance of the net proceeds after investing in 1 and 2 above would be for general corporate purposes and partial settlement of outstanding liabilities.

We will pay for expenses of this offering, except that the Selling Stockholder will pay any broker discounts or commissions or equivalent expenses and expenses of their legal counsel applicable to the sale of their shares.

The full execution of the Company’s business plan is dependent on adequate funds being available, which will require additional third party financings, the success of which cannot be assured. See sections titled “The Business of the Company” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this prospectus for more information on the Company’s business plan.

19

Dilution

If you purchase shares in this offering your interest will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share you will pay in this offering and the adjusted net tangible book value per share of our Common Stock immediately following this offering.

Net tangible book value per share is determined by dividing our total tangible assets less total tangible liabilities (excluding goodwill and other intangibles) by the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the measurement date. The Company had no intangible assets as of the measurement date.

Our negative net tangible book value as of June 30, 2020 was $7,846,748, and the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of June 30, 2020 was 222,307,381 which excludes, as of such date:

4,188,630 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of our outstanding stock options, with a weighted average exercise price of $3.3031 per share;
 ●

54,490,578 shares of Common Stock reserved and available for future issuances under our equity plans;

124,514,653 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of our outstanding stock purchase warrants, with a weighted average exercise price of $0.03272 per share;

55,578,272 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of our outstanding convertible promissory notes; and
11 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of our outstanding convertible preferred stock, and 6,497 shares identified as Pier Contingent Shares, at a conversion price of $2,208.375 per share.

Using our negative tangible book value as of June 30, 2020 and the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of June 30, 2020 (subject to the exclusions described above), our negative net tangible book value per share would be $0.019340.

Dilution per share to new investors represents the difference between the public offering price per share paid by investors in this offering and the adjusted net tangible book value per share of Common Stock immediately after giving effect to this offering.

Our adjusted negative net tangible book value is our negative net tangible book value after giving further effect to the sale of 115,000,000 shares of our Common Stock in this offering by the Selling Stockholder at the assumed public offering price of $0.005 per share, which is the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on October 7, 2020, as reported by the OTCQB, and after deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The following table illustrates this per share dilution to investors participating in this offering:

Assumed public offering price per share  $0.005 
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2020, before giving effect to the offering $(0.035297)
Increase in net tangible book value per share from new investors participating in this offering $307,666 
Adjusted net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2020 after giving effect to the offering $(0.022351)
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to investors participating in this offering $

0.027351

Because a material change in the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock occurred since June 30, 2020, below is also a calculation of dilution using our negative net tangible book value as of June 30, 2020, which was approximately $7,846,748, and the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of September 30, 2020, which was 577,842,003 and which excludes, as of such date:

71,660,938 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of our outstanding stock options, with a weighted average exercise price of $0.19695 per share;
 ●87,033,715 shares of Common Stock reserved and available for future issuances under our equity plans;
288,093,580 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of our outstanding stock purchase warrants, with a weighted average exercise price of $0.01474 per share;
47,239,857 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of our outstanding convertible promissory notes, with a weighted average conversion price of $0.01052 per share; and
11 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of our outstanding convertible preferred stock, and 6,497 shares identified as Pier Contingent Shares, at a conversion price of $2,208.375 per share.

Assumed public offering price per share  $0.005 
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2020, before giving effect to the offering, assuming the number of shares Common Stock outstanding at September 30, 2020 $(0.013579)
Increase in net tangible book value per share from new investors participating in this offering  $307,666 
Adjusted net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2020 after giving effect to the offering $(0.010881)
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to investors participating in this offering, assuming the number of shares Common Stock outstanding at September 30, 2020 $

0.015881

The information discussed above is illustrative only, and the dilution information following this offering will be adjusted based on the actual public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing. The lower our stock price is at the time we exercise our put right under the Purchase Agreement, the more shares of our Common Stock we will have to issue to the Selling Stockholder to draw down pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. If our stock price decreases during the pricing period, then our existing stockholders will experience further dilution. Further, the above illustration assumes no exercise of outstanding options to purchase our common stock or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock or conversion of outstanding promissory notes or outstanding shares of preferred stock that will be outstanding after this offering. The exercise of outstanding options and warrants and the conversion of outstanding promissory notes and shares of preferred stock that will be outstanding after this offering having an exercise price or conversion price, as applicable, less than the offering price will increase dilution to the new investors.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY ANDDividend Policy

Market Information, Holders, and Dividends

Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “RSPI”. The quotations on the OTCQB reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

As of September 30, 2020, there were 118 stockholders of record of our Common Stock. On October 7, 2020, the high and low sales prices as quoted on the OTCQB market were $0.0053 and $0.0046 respectively, and 2,066,112 shares of Common Stock were traded on that day.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 through the date of this filing, we did not repurchase any of our securities.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future. Following the completion of this offering, we intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to finance the further development and expansion of our business and do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs, outstanding indebtedness, plans for expansion, restrictions imposed by lenders or by other financing arrangements, if any, and the limitations on payment of dividends under the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding options, warrants and rights and shares reserved for future issuance under our existing equity compensation plans as of September 30, 2020. In March 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved, by written consent, the Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2014 Equity, Equity-Linked and Equity Derivative Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”), filed as exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 24, 2014, which provides for the issuance of shares of Common Stock, in the form of stock grants and options to directors, officers, employees, consultants and other service providers of the Company. On June 30, 2015, the Board adopted the 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan (the “2015 Plan”), filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 8, 2015, which similarly provides for the issuance of equity and equity derivative securities such as options.

The Company amended the 2015 Plan on March 31, 2016, January 17, 2017, December 9, 2017, December 28, 2018, May 5, 2020, and July 31, 2020 and filed descriptions of such amendments on the Company’s Current Reports on Form 8-K on April 6, 2016, January 23, 2017, December 14, 2017, January 4, 2019, May 6, 2020, and August 3, 2020, respectively. The amendments discussed above primarily increased the number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued under the 2015 Plan as approved by the Board, with the latest amendment expanding the number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued under the 2015 plan to 158,985,260 shares. The Company has not presented, nor does it intend to present, the 2015 Plan, as amended, to shareholders for approval.

Plan Category Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise
of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)
  Weighted
average
exercise price of
outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
  Number of securities
remaining available for
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a)) (c)
 
Equity compensation plan approved by security holders (i)  15,635  $6.40300   63,245 
             
Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders (including non-plan options) and other options granted not subject to any plans (ii)  71,645,303   $0.19560   87,033,715 
             
Total  71,660,938   $0.19695   87,096,960 

(i)Under the equity compensation plan approved by security holders, (A) 199,988 shares of restricted stock have been issued, (B) 29,623 of incentive stock options have been granted of which 13,988 have expired unexercised, leaving 15,635 granted and available for exercise and (C) 32,169 non-qualified stock options have been granted, all of which have expired. 63,245 shares of Common Stock remain available for issuance under this equity compensation plan.
(ii) Under the equity compensation plan not approved by security holders 71,623,559 securities are issuable upon exercise of outstanding options. An additional 21,744 securities are issuable upon the exercise of options that are not the subject of any plan. 87,033,715 securities are issuable under the equity compensation plan not approved by security holders.

21

The Offering

On July 28, 2020, we entered into the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Selling Stockholder committed to purchase an aggregate of up to $2,000,000 of our Common Stock over a period of time expiring on June 30, 2021, unless earlier terminated by the Selling Stockholder’s purchase of all shares of Common Stock allotted under the Purchase Agreement or the termination of the Purchase Agreement. From time to time during that period commencing from the effectiveness of this registration statement, we may deliver a purchase notice to the Selling Stockholder which states the number of shares of Common Stock that we intend to sell to the Selling Stockholder on a date pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. The number of shares per purchase notice must be no more than 250% of the average daily trading volume of our Common Stock for the five consecutive trading days immediately prior to date of the applicable purchase notice, and the purchase notice must be for more than $25,000 unless waived by the Selling Stockholder. No later than the second trading day following the delivery of the purchase notice, the Selling Stockholder must deposit into escrow 150% of the closing price of the Common Stock on the date the purchase notice is delivered multiplied by the number of shares listed in the purchase notice. No later than the second trading day following the deposit, the Company must deliver the shares of Common Stock to the Selling Stockholder. Five trading days after the entire trading day that the Selling Stockholder holds the purchased shares in its brokerage account and is eligible to trade the shares (the “Closing Date”), the purchase price, minus any fees and expenses owing to the escrow agent, must be released from escrow to the Company with the remainder to the Selling Stockholder. The purchase price per share to be paid by the Selling Stockholder is equal to 85% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of Common Stock for the five trading days prior to the Closing Date. The Purchase Agreement is not transferable and any benefits attached thereto may not be assigned.

In connection with the Purchase Agreement, we entered into a registration rights agreement with the Selling Stockholder, pursuant to which we agreed to use our best efforts to, within 30 trading days of execution of the Purchase Agreement, file with the SEC this registration statement, covering the shares of our Common Stock issued or that the Company is entitled to issue pursuant to purchase notices delivered under the Purchase Agreement, so as to permit the resale of such shares by the Selling Stockholder.

At an assumed purchase price under the Purchase Agreement of $0.0039797 (equal to 85% of 0.004682, the lowest volume weighted average price during the five trading days ending on October 7, 2020, as reported on the OTCQB), the 115,000,000 shares being offered pursuant to this prospectus represent approximately 23% of the shares issuable pursuant to the Company’s put right under the Purchase Agreement at the same assumed purchase price. Assuming the sale of all 115,000,000 shares being registered hereby at that purchase price, we would receive $457,666 in gross proceeds from the issuance and sale of such shares to the Selling Stockholder. At that purchase price, we would be required to register for resale 387,550,318 additional shares to obtain $1,542,334, the balance of the $2,000,000 commitment amount under the Purchase Agreement. Due to the floating offering price, we are not able to determine the exact number of shares issuable under the Purchase Agreement. If our stock price were to increase, we would be able to issue a lesser number of shares and if our stock price were to decrease, we would need to issue a greater number of shares . To the extent necessary to fulfill our obligations under the Purchase Agreement, we will file additional registration statements relating to additional shares issuable to the Selling Stockholder under the Purchase Agreement.

The aggregate maximum investment amount of $2,000,000 was determined based on numerous factors, including its intended use for general corporate and working capital purposes or for other purposes that our Board in its good faith deem to be in the best interest of the Company.

We intend to periodically sell to the Selling Stockholder our Common Stock under the Purchase Agreement and we believe that it is the intent of the Selling Stockholder, in turn, to sell such shares to investors in the market at the market price. This may cause our stock price to decline, which will require us to subsequently issue increasing numbers of shares of Common Stock to the Selling Stockholder to raise the same amount of funds we would have raised if our stock price did not decline. We are not obligated to sell additional shares to the Selling Stockholder, but it is currently our intent to do so. If our stock price declines to a level at which we are no longer willing to sell shares to the Selling Stockholder, we may not sell such shares until our stock price and/or trading volume increases. We may have to increase the number of our authorized shares in order to issue the shares to the Selling Stockholder if we reach the limit of our current amount of authorized shares of Common Stock. Increasing the number of our authorized shares will require Board and stockholder approval. Further, because our ability to draw down any amounts under the Purchase Agreement is subject to a number of conditions, there is no guarantee that we will be able to draw down any portion or all of the proceeds of the $2,000,000 commitment under the Purchase Agreement. Accordingly, investors may be exposed to risks that include dilution of stockholders’ percentage ownership, significant decline in our stock price and our inability to draw sufficient funds when needed. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 in this registration statement for more information.

22

Selling Stockholder

This prospectus relates to the resale of up to 115,000,000 shares of Common Stock, issuable to the Selling Stockholder, pursuant to our put right under the Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Agreement permits us to put an aggregate of up to $2,000,000 in shares of Common Stock to the Selling Stockholder over a period of time expiring on June 30, 2021, unless earlier terminated by the Selling Stockholder’s purchase of all shares of Common Stock issuable under the Purchase Agreement or the termination of the Purchase Agreement. The Selling Stockholder may offer and sell, from time to time, any or all of shares of our Common Stock to be put to this stockholder under the Purchase Agreement.

As of September 30, 2020, the Selling Stockholder does not beneficially own any shares of Common Stock and, following the completion of the offering, assuming that the Selling Stockholder will sell all of its shares of our Common Stock being offered in the offering, the Selling Stockholder will not beneficially own any shares of Common Stock. The Selling Stockholder may offer and sell all or only some portion of the 115,000,000 shares of our Common Stock being offered pursuant to this prospectus.

In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to the Selling Stockholder a convertible note with a face amount of $25,000, which becomes convertible into shares of Common Stock in January 2021 at a per share conversion price equal to $0.02.

The Selling Stockholder has not had any position or office, or other material relationship with us or any of our affiliates over the past three years. To our knowledge, the Selling Stockholder is not a broker-dealer or an affiliate of a broker-dealer. We may require the Selling Stockholder to suspend sales of the shares of our Common Stock being offered pursuant to this prospectus upon the occurrence of any event that makes any statement in this prospectus or the related registration statement untrue in any material respect or that requires the changing of statements in these documents in order to make statements in these documents not misleading.

Yash Thukral has the voting and dispositive power over securities owned by the Selling Stockholder.

23

Plan of Distribution

This prospectus relates to the resale of 115,000,000 shares of our Common Stock issuable to the Selling Stockholder pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Agreement permits us to issue, from time to time, purchase notices for an aggregate of up to $2,000,000 in shares of our Common Stock to the Selling Stockholder over a period of time expiring on June 30, 2021, unless earlier terminated by the Selling Stockholder’s purchase of all shares of Common Stock allotted under the Purchase Agreement or the termination of the Purchase Agreement. The purchase price per share to be paid by the Selling Stockholder is equal to 85% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of Common Stock for the five trading days prior to the date that is five trading days after the entire trading day that the Selling Stockholder holds the purchased shares in its brokerage account and is eligible to trade the shares. The Purchase Agreement is not transferable. Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company indemnifies the Selling Stockholder from and against any damages or actions to which the Selling Stockholder becomes subject resulting from, among other causes of action, any violation or alleged violation by the Company of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, any state securities law or any rule or regulation thereunder, as such damages are incurred, except to the extent such damages result primarily from the Selling Stockholder’s breach of the Purchase Agreement or the Selling Stockholder’s negligence, recklessness or bad faith in performing its obligations under the Purchase Agreement.

At the assumed purchase price of $0.0039797 and assuming the sale of all 115,000,000 shares being registered hereby, we would receive $457,666 in gross proceeds from the issuance and sale of such shares to the Selling Stockholder. At that same assumed purchase price, we would be required to register 387,550,318 additional shares to obtain $1,542,334, the balance of the $2,000,000 commitment amount under the Purchase Agreement. Due to the floating offering price under the Purchase Agreement, we are not able to determine the exact number of shares issuable thereunder. If our stock price were to increase, we would be able to issue a lesser number of shares and if our stock price were to decrease, we would need to issue a greater number of shares.

The Selling Stockholder may, from time to time, sell any or all of shares of our Common Stock covered hereby on the OTCQB, any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions, and may do so at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at varying prices or at negotiated prices. The Selling Stockholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling securities:

ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which a broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
block trades in which a broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
privately negotiated transactions;
transactions through broker-dealers that agree with the selling stockholder to sell a specified number of such securities at a stipulated price per security;
the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;
a combination of any such methods of sale; or
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The Selling Stockholder may also sell securities under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus. The Selling Stockholder has indicated that it does not intend to engage in passive market making transactions permitted under Rule 103 of Regulation M.

Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Stockholder may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the Selling Stockholder (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but except as set forth in a supplement to this prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440, and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.

In connection with the sale of the securities or interests therein, the Selling Stockholder may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Stockholder may also sell securities short and deliver these securities to close out its short positions, or loan or pledge the securities to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Stockholder may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or may create one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of securities offered by this prospectus, which securities such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

We intend to periodically sell to the Selling Stockholder our Common Stock under the Purchase Agreement and we believe that it is the intent of the Selling Stockholder, in turn, to sell such shares to investors in the market at the market price. This may cause our stock price to decline, which will require us to subsequently issue increasing numbers of shares of Common Stock to the Selling Stockholder to raise the same amount of funds we would have raised if our stock price did not decline. We are not obligated to sell additional shares to the Selling Stockholder, but it is currently our intent to do so. If our stock price declines to a level at which we are no longer willing to sell shares to the Selling Stockholder, we may not sell such shares until our stock price and/or trading volume increases. We may have to increase the number of our authorized shares in order to issue the shares to the Selling Stockholder if we reach the limit of our current amount of authorized shares of Common Stock. Increasing the number of our authorized shares will require Board and stockholder approval.

The Selling Stockholder is an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. We are required to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by us incident to the registration of the securities.

The Selling Stockholder will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act, including Rule 172 thereunder.

The resale securities will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale securities covered hereby may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale securities may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the Common Stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholder will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of securities of the Common Stock by the Selling Stockholder or any other person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the Selling Stockholder and will inform it of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).

25

DESCRIPTION OF Securities

The following is a general description of the Common Stock of the Company and does not purport to be complete. For a complete description of the terms and provisions of the Common Stock, refer to our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to these documents.

Authorized and Outstanding Capital Stock

The Company is authorized to issue a total of 1,005,000,000 shares of capital stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. Of the authorized amount, 1,000,000,000 of the shares are designated as Common Stock and 5,000,000 of the shares are designated as preferred stock. The Board has authorized an increase in authorized share capital to 3,000,000,000 shares of capital stock, subject to stockholder approval. The Company’s Common Stock is registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. No other security of the Company is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

As of September 30, 2020, there were 577,842,003 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, approximately 351,808,801 of which were held by non-affiliates of the Company.

Common Stock

General. Each share of the Company’s Common Stock has the same rights and privileges. Holders of the Common Stock do not have any preferences or any preemptive, redemption, subscription, conversion or exchange rights. All outstanding shares of Common Stock are fully paid and non-assessable. The Company’s Common Stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “RSPI.”

Voting Rights. The holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote upon all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held. There is no cumulative voting.

Dividends. The Company has never paid cash dividends on its Common Stock and does not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends, if any, will be determined by the Board in light of conditions then existing and may be paid on the Common Stock subject to the prior rights and preferences, if any, applicable to shares of preferred stock or any series of preferred stock, when and if declared by the Board, out of funds legally available therefor.

Liquidation and Distribution. If the Company voluntarily or involuntarily liquidates, dissolves or winds-up, or upon any distribution of assets, the holders of Common Stock will be entitled to receive, after distribution in full of the preferential amounts, if any, to be distributed to the holders of preferred stock or any series of preferred stock, all of the remaining assets available for distribution equally and ratably in proportion to the number of shares of Common Stock held by them.

Material Limitation or Qualification of Rights of Common Stock

Preferred Stock, Generally. The Company may issue preferred stock with such powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations, and restrictions as the Board may, without prior stockholder approval, establish. The existence, and potential future issuance, of shares of preferred stock by the Company could result in substantial dilution of the economic and governance rights of holders of Common Stock.

As of September 30, 2020, the Company’s authorized shares of preferred stock are designated into series as follows: 3,000 shares are designated Series H 2% Voting, Non-Participating, Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series H Preferred Stock”); 37,500 shares are designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”); 1,700 shares are designated Series G 1.5% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series G Preferred Stock”); 1,250,000 shares are designated 9% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“9% Preferred Stock”); 205,000 shares are designated Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”); and 3,504,600 shares are undesignated and may be issued with such rights and powers as the Board may designate.

Series H Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2020, there were no shares of Series H Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding or accrued as dividends as all outstanding shares of Series H Preferred Stock inclusive of accrued dividends converted into units that resulted in the issuance of 253,774,260 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 253,774,260 shares of Common Stock. Each share of Series H Preferred Stock is convertible into 156,250 units at an effective conversion price of $0.0064 per unit, with each unit comprising one share of Common Stock and one warrant exercisable for one share of Common Stock. Each share of Series H Preferred Stock entitles the holder to that number of votes equal to two times the number of shares of Common Stock into which it is convertible. In the event of any liquidation or winding up of the Company prior to and in preference to any junior securities, the holders of the Series H Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive in preference to the holders of any junior securities a per share amount equal to the $0.001, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.

26

Series B Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2020, 37,500 shares of Series B Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into approximately 0.00030 shares of Common Stock at an effective conversion price of $2,208.375 per share of Common Stock, which is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. As of September 30, 2020, the shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding are convertible into 11 shares of Common Stock. Shares of Series B Preferred Stock do not entitle the holder to voting rights. The Company may redeem the Series B Preferred Stock for $25,001, equivalent to $0.6667 per share, an amount equal to the liquidation preference, at any time upon 30 days prior notice.

Series G Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2020, no shares of Series G Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding. If issued, each share of Series G Preferred Stock would be convertible into that number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing $1,000 by an initial conversion price of $0.0033. The conversion price with respect to a share of Series G Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment upon certain events that occur while such share is outstanding, pursuant to Section 7 of the Certificate of Designation for the Series G Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2020, the conversion price with respect to Series G Preferred Stock is not subject to adjustment because no shares of Series G Preferred Stock are outstanding. If issued, each outstanding share of Series G Preferred Stock, prior to the date such share is eligible for conversion, entitles the holder to 303,030 votes per share (which may be subject to adjustment as described above), and thereafter, each share entitles the holder to voting rights on an as-converted basis.

9% Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2020, no shares of 9% Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding. If issued, each share of 9% Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of Common Stock according to a conversion rate subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including a reverse stock split, as set forth under our Certificate of Incorporation. Thereunder, each share of 9% Preferred Stock is convertible into that number of shares of Common Stock determined by $325.00 ($1.00 before adjustment for the reverse stock split) by a conversion rate of $487.50 ($1.50 before adjustment for the reverse stock split), which is after adjustment for the reverse stock split effected by the Company on September 1, 2016, whereby each 325 shares of Common Stock was exchanged and combined into one share of Common Stock. Shares of 9% Preferred Stock do not entitle the holder to voting rights.

Series A Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2020, no shares of Series A Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding. Shares of Series A Preferred Stock do not entitle the holder to voting rights, except to the extent the holder would be entitled to vote with the holders of Common Stock as set forth in the Certificate of Designation for the Series A Preferred Stock.

Contemplated Corporate Actions. The Company is seeking to amend its Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of its authorized shares of Common Stock and to possibly effect a reverse split of its shares of Common Stock. See the section titled “Prospectus Summary—Recent Developments” for more information on these contemplated corporate actions. In addition, the Company intends to form two subsidiaries, ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx, the former to develop the cannabinoid platform and the latter to develop the neuromodulator platform, as more fully described in the section “Prospectus Summary – Business Overview as well as in the section that follows entitled THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY.

Anti-Takeover Provisions in the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

Certain provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws summarized below may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt, including attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the Company’s securities.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that: (i) the Company may issue preferred stock with such powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations, and restrictions as the Board may, without prior stockholder approval, establish, as described above; and (ii) special meetings of stockholders may only be called by the chairman of the Board, the president, the secretary, a majority of the members of the Board or the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding.

27

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the shares of Common Stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

As of September 30, 2020, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP owns stock options of the Company exercisable at $3.90 per share of Common Stock until January 17, 2022 for 10,000 shares of Common Stock which, as of September 30, 2020, have an aggregate value of $54.

EXPERTS

The condensed financial statements of the Company included in this prospectus for the six-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2020, have not been audited by the Company’s auditors, Haskell & White LLP. The consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were audited by Haskell & White LLP. Any condensed financial statements included herein are derived either from the condensed financial statements or audited financial statements noted above and included herein. Our financial statements are included in reliance of Haskell & White LLP’s report, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

28

THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY

Description of Business

Overview

The Company was formed in 1987 under the name Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to engage in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative pharmaceuticals for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Virtually allneurological and psychiatric disorders. On December 16, 2015, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to change its name from Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. In August 2012, the Company acquired Pier Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Pier”), which is now a wholly owned subsidiary. Pier was a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company developing a pharmacologic treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (“OSA”) and had been engaged in research and clinical development activities, which activities are now in the Company, rather than Pier.

The mission of the Company is to develop innovative and revolutionary treatments to combat diseases caused by disruption of neuronal signaling. We are developing treatment options that address conditions affecting millions of people, but for which there are few or poor treatment options, including OSA, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”), epilepsy, chronic pain and recovery from spinal cord injury (“SCI”). The Company is developing a pipeline of new drug products based on our broad patent portfolios for two drug platforms: (i) pharmaceutical cannabinoids, which include dronabinol, a synthetic form of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) that acts upon the nervous system’s endogenous cannabinoid receptors and (ii) neuromodulators, which include ampakines and GABAkines, proprietary compounds that, as positive allosteric modulators (“PAMs”), positively modulate AMPA-type glutamate receptors and GABAA receptors, respectively. At this time, due to insufficient funding, we do not have any active clinical trials and our development operations are limited to planning activities.

The Company is also engaged in a number of business development efforts (licensing/sub-licensing, joint venture and other commercial structures) with a view to securing strategic partnerships that represent strategic and operational infrastructure additions, as well as cash and in-kind funding opportunities. These efforts have focused on, but have not been limited to, transacting with brand and generic pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies as well as companies with potentially useful formulation or manufacturing capabilities, significant subject matter expertise and financial resources. No assurance can be given that any transaction will come to fruition and that if it does, that the terms will be favorable to the Company.

Product Development Plans

In order to facilitate our business activities and product development, we are organizing our drug platforms into two separate business units. The business unit focused on pharmaceutical cannabinoids is named ResolutionRx and the business unit focused on neuromodulators is named EndeavourRx. It is anticipated that the Company will use, at least initially, its management personnel to provide management, operational and oversight services to these two business units. Below is a description of the Company’s product development plans within these business units, and further below is background information on these business units.

ResolutionRx – Dronabinol program

For the dronabinol program within our ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform, the Company plans to manufacture, on a pilot scale, one or more new proprietary formulations of dronabinol with the enhanced properties described in our patent applications, for which we plan to spend approximately $150,000 to bench test in vitro several versions of dronabinol formulations in order to determine those with the best physico-chemical properties. To finance these efforts, the Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” of this prospectus for more information.

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company intends to spend approximately $450,000 to $600,000 of these funds on the continued development of a proprietary formulation of dronabinol. This development would include (i) improvements to the Company’s intellectual property position, (ii) improvements to our dronabinol formulation’s PK profile, (iii) improvements to regulatory compliance, and (iv) expenditures for the initial stocking of clinical supply, packaging and distribution in anticipation of a Phase 2 PK/PD clinical trial and a pivotal Phase 3 clinical study. The performance of the Phase 2 PK/PD clinical trial and Phase 3 clinical study, however, would need yet additional funds either from separate financings or a collaboration with a strategic partner.

EndeavourRx – AMPAkines program

For the AMPAkines program within our EndeavourRx neuromodulators platform, the Company plans to initiate clinical testing of our AMPAkines in the treatment of SCI. To this end, approximately $145,000 would be utilized to assess the purity of our existing drug supplies and finalize a clinical trial protocol for a Phase 2A clinical trial to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic (“PK”) properties of one of our lead AMPAkines in patients who have had SCI. These tasks are critical for applying to the FDA for permission to amend our existing IND or initiate a new IND enabling the commencement of clinical trials. To finance these efforts, the Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” of this prospectus for more information.

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company would continue to focus on SCI, as we believe it would be the most efficient expenditure of our resources and yield an actionable result in the shortest period of time. Expenditures would include: (i) an estimated spend of $200,000 for chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) efforts, depending on the assessment of our drug supplies, (ii) an estimated spend of $400,000 on an initial Phase 2A single ascending dose safety and PK and pharmacodynamic (“PD”) study in human SCI patients, (iii) an estimated spend of $600,000 on a Phase 2A multiple ascending dose safety and PK and PD study in SCI patients, and (iv) an estimated spend of $650,000 on a Phase 2B efficacy study in SCI patients. Our anticipated spend for ADHD would be approximately $100,000 with the larger spends occurring later dependent upon availability of financing.

EndeavourRx – GABAkines program

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company plans to finance efforts with respect to the GABAkines program within our EndeavourRx neuromodulators platform. These efforts would be in preparation of an IND to be submitted to the FDA to commence human studies of KRM-II-81, our lead GABAkine drug candidate, for treatment-resistant epilepsy, and expenditures would include (i) an estimated spend of $530,000 for CMC efforts, (ii) an estimated spend of $450,000 for pre-clinical pharmacology, safety and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (“ADME”) studies, (iii) an estimated spend of $225,000 for animal safety studies and (iv) an estimated spend of $65,000 for regulatory consultants.

Neurotransmission

The brain is composed of specialized nerve cells called neurons that communicate information with each other via a process known as neurotransmission.

Neurotransmission

As illustrated in this figure, during neurotransmission, neurons release chemicals called neurotransmitters which attach to receptors, very specific protein structures residing on adjacent neurons. This enables neurons to communicate with one another by either increasing or decreasing the excitability of the neuron receiving the communication. For example, glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, while gamma-amino-butyric acid (“GABA”) is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter. Neurons also contain receptors for the brain’s own natural cannabinoid (endocannabinoid) substances.

ResolutionRx – Pharmaceutical Cannabinoids

Background

Cannabinoids are pharmacologically active substances found within the marijuana plant. Due to the liberalization of state laws regulating the use and sales of marijuana over the last 5 years, a major multinationalindustry has grown around the commercialization of marijuana for both medical and recreational use. However, while personal marijuana use has been legalized in certain states, it still is not legal under federal statutes and regulations. The medical use of any pharmacological agent must be approved by the FDA and, to date, the FDA has not recognized or approved the marijuana plant as medicine nor is it federally legal to sell products that contain cannabinoids as drugs or dietary supplements without its approval.

Worldwide clinical research efforts have established the cannabinoid class of compounds as bona fide pharmaceutical products, or “pharmaceutical cannabinoids,” that are being developed and commercialized according to FDA regulatory and industry guidelines. Scientific research and commercial development to date has focused primarily on two major cannabinoids, THC and cannabidiol (“CBD”). This research and development began in 1985 when dronabinol, a synthetic form of THC, was approved as Marinol® by the FDA for the treatment of AIDS-related anorexia and later for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Dronabinol, in its Marinol® formulation as well as numerous generic formulations, is available in 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg capsules, with a maximum labelled dosage of 20 mg/day for the AIDS indication, or 15 mg/m2 per dose for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

This initial breakthrough subsequently led to the recent FDA approval of Epidiolex®, a proprietary oral solution of highly purified, plant-derived CBD sold by GW Pharmaceuticals plc (“GW Pharma”) for the treatment of certain rare, treatment-resistant forms of epilepsy. Nabiximol®, an oromucosal spray containing THC and CBD, was approved under the tradename Sativex® by applicable regulatory authorities in 25 countries outside the United States and is sold by GW Pharma in those countries for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

The commercialization of these pharmaceutical cannabinoids has opened the door to an expanding market sector. In order to capitalize upon this opportunity, the Company is implementing an internal restructuring plan by forming ResolutionRx as a stand-alone business focused on the pharmaceutical cannabinoid market. ResolutionRx’s initial primary focus has been and will be the re-purposing of dronabinol using new proprietary formulations and therapeutic indications. Because dronabinol already is an approved drug, we intend to use publicly available information, particularly safety data, in support of a 505(b)(2) New Drug Application (“NDA”), a much more rapid route to FDA approval than a standard 505(b)(1) NDA.

OSA and Existing Treatments

The Company is developing dronabinol for the treatment of OSA, a sleep-related breathing disorder that afflicts an estimated 29 million people in the United States according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (“AASM”), and an additional 26 million in Germany and 8 million in the United Kingdom, as presented at the European Respiratory Society’s annual Congress in Paris, France in September 2018. OSA involves a decrease or complete halt in airflow despite an ongoing effort to breathe during sleep. When the muscles relax during sleep, soft tissue in the back of the throat collapses and obstructs the upper airway. OSA remains significantly under-recognized, as only 20% of cases in the United States according to the AASM and 20% of cases globally have been properly diagnosed. About 24 percent of adult men and 9 percent of adult women are believed to have the breathing symptoms of OSA with or without daytime sleepiness. OSA significantly impacts the lives of sufferers who do not get enough sleep; their quality of sleep is deteriorated such that daily function is compromised and limited. OSA is associated with decreased quality of life, significant functional impairment, and increased risk of road traffic accidents, especially in professions like road and rail transportation and shipping.

Research has established links between OSA and several important co-morbidities, including hypertension, type II diabetes, obesity, stroke, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmias, and even early mortality. The consequences of undiagnosed and untreated OSA are medically serious and economically costly. According to the AASM, the estimated economic burden of OSA in the United States is approximately $162 billion annually. All current treatment options have serious drawbacks. We believe that a new drug therapy that is effective in reducing the medical and economic burden of OSA would have major benefits for the treatment of this costly disease indication.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (“CPAP”) is the most common treatment for OSA. CPAP devices work by blowing pressurized air into the nose (or mouth and nose), which keeps the pharyngeal airway open. Patients must use the device whenever they sleep. Reduction of the apnea/hypopnea index (“AHI”) is the standard objective measure of therapeutic response in OSA. Apnea is the cessation of breathing for 10 seconds or more and hypopnea is a reduction in breathing. AHI is the sum of apnea and hypopnea events per hour. In the sleep laboratory, CPAP is highly effective at reducing AHI. However, the device is cumbersome and difficult for many patients to tolerate. Most studies describe that 25-50% of patients refuse to initiate or completely discontinue CPAP use within the first several months and that most patients who continue to use the device do so only intermittently.

Oral devices may be an option for patients who cannot tolerate CPAP. Several dental devices are available. The cost of these devices tends to be high and side effects associated with them include night-time pain, dry lips, tooth discomfort, and excessive salivation.

Patients with clinically significant OSA who cannot be treated adequately with CPAP or oral devices may elect to undergo surgery, the most common form of which involves the removal of excess tissue in the throat to make the airway wider. Patients who undergo surgery for the treatment of OSA risk complications. Surgery is often unsuccessful, and at present, no method exists to reliably predict therapeutic outcome from surgery.

Recently, another surgical option has become available based on upper airway stimulation. It is a combination of an implantable nerve stimulator and an external remote controlled by the patient. The implanted device stimulates the hypoglossal nerve, which controls the tongue, with every attempted breath, regardless of whether such stimulation is needed for that breath. The device is turned on at night and off in the morning by the patient with the remote.

The Company’s Rights and Research Efforts Regarding the Treatment of OSA with Cannabinoids

The poor tolerance and long-term adherence to CPAP, as well as the limitations of mechanical devices and surgery, make discovery of pharmaco-therapeutic alternatives, like cannabinoids, clinically relevant and important. In order to expand the Company’s respiratory disorders program and develop cannabinoids for the treatment of OSA, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding equity securities of Pier, now its wholly owned subsidiary, effective August 10, 2012. Through the Company’s acquisition of Pier, the Company gained access to a pre-existing relationship Pier had with the UIC. Effective June 27, 2014, the Company entered into the UIC License Agreement with UIC, which became effective when certain conditions were met in September 2014. The agreement gave the Company certain exclusive rights with respect to certain patents and patent applications in the United States and other countries claiming the use of dronabinol and other cannabinoids for the treatment of sleep-related breathing disorders, including sleep apnea.

These rights empowered the Company’s translational research on dronabinol, the results of which demonstrate that dronabinol has the potential to become the first FDA-approved drug to specifically treat this condition in this large and underserved market of OSA patients. The Company conducted a 21-day, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation Phase 2A clinical study in 22 patients with OSA, in which dronabinol produced a statistically significant reduction in AHI, the primary therapeutic end point, and was observed to be safe and well tolerated, with the frequency of side effects no different from placebo. This clinical trial provided data supporting the submission of patent applications claiming unique dosage strengths and controlled release formulations optimized for use in the treatment of OSA. If approved, these pending patents would extend market exclusivity from 2025 until at least 2031.

With approximately $5 million in funding from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), Dr. David Carley of the UIC, along with his colleagues at the UIC and Northwestern University, completed a Phase 2B multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of dronabinol in patients with OSA. This study, named “Pharmacotherapy of Apnea with Cannabimimetic Enhancement” (“PACE”) replicated the results of the earlier Phase 2A study. The authors reported that, in a dose-dependent fashion, treatment with 2.5 mg and 10 mg of dronabinol once per day at night, significantly reduced, compared to placebo, AHI during sleep in the 56 evaluable patients with moderate to severe OSA who completed the study. Additionally, treatment with 10 mg of dronabinol significantly improved daytime sleepiness as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and achieved the greatest overall patient satisfaction. As in the previous Phase 2A study, dronabinol was observed to be safe and well tolerated, with the frequency of side effects no different from placebo. The Company did not manage this clinical trial, which was funded entirely by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of NIH.

32

EndeavourRx - Neuromodulators

Background

As described above, during the neurotransmission process, neurons release neurotransmitters that attach to specific receptors residing on adjacent neurons, enabling them to communicate with one another and produce excitatory or inhibitory effects. For example, glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain and GABA is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter. While the neurotransmitter attachment site on each of these receptors does not change, the receptor protein subunit structures can vary so that the receptors can produce a variety of effects. With the AMPA glutamate receptor, the binding of glutamate or an artificial agonist to its attachment site causes a change in the structure of the AMPA receptor resulting in an increased excitability. Likewise, in the case of the GABAA receptor, the binding of GABA or an artificial agonist to its attachment site causes a change in the structure of the GABAA receptor ion channel and increases the flow of chloride ions (negatively charged anion) into the cell, resulting in a decreased excitability.

Neurotransmitter receptor proteins also may contain auxiliary “allosteric” binding sites, which are located adjacent to the agonist binding sites at which neurotransmitters act. Unlike neurotransmitters, neuromodulators are drugs that act at these allosteric binding sites rather than directly at the agonist binding site. They can act either as PAMs, which enhance, or as negative allosteric modulators (“NAMs”), which reduce, the actions of neurotransmitters at their primary receptor sites. Neuromodulators have no intrinsic activity of their own. We have coined the terms “ampakines” and “GABAkines” to refer to drugs that act as PAMs at the AMPA and GABAA receptors, respectively. By enhancing the effects of neurotransmitters without altering the normal pattern of neuronal activity, neuromodulators offer the possibility of developing “kinder and gentler” neuropharmacological drugs effective in certain neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, with greater pharmacological specificity and reduced side effects.

In order to capitalize upon a possible market opportunity with respect to neuromodulators, the Company is implementing an internal restructuring plan by forming EndeavourRx as a stand-alone business focused on the neuromodulator market. EndeavourRx will comprise our ampakine program and our GABAkine program.

AMPAkines

The Company is developing a class of proprietary compounds known as ampakines, which are PAMs of the AMPA glutamate receptor. Ampakines are small molecule compounds that enhance the excitatory actions of glutamate at the AMPA receptor complex, which mediates most excitatory transmission in the CNS. Through an extensive translational research effort from the cellular level through Phase 2 clinical trials, we have developed a family of ampakines, including CX717, CX1739 and CX1942 that may have clinical application in the treatment of CNS-driven neurobehavioral and cognitive disorders, SCI, neurological diseases, and certain orphan indications. CX717 and CX1739, our lead clinical compounds, have successfully completed multiple Phase 1 safety trials with no drug-associated serious adverse events. Both compounds have also completed Phase 2 efficacy trials demonstrating target engagement, by antagonizing the process of opioid-induced respiratory depression (“OIRD”). CX717 has successfully completed a Phase 2 trial demonstrating the ability to significantly reduce the symptoms of adult ADHD. In an early Phase 2 study, CX1739 improved breathing in patients with central sleep apnea. Preclinical studies have highlighted the potential ability of these ampakines to improve motor function in animals with SCI. Subject to raising sufficient financing (of which no assurance can be provided), we believe that we will be able to initiate a human Phase 2 study with CX1739 or CX717 in patients with SCI and a human Phase 2B study in patients with ADHD using either CX1739 or CX717.

33

AMPAkines as Treatment for ADHD

ADHD is one of the most common neurobehavioral disorders. Currently available treatments for ADHD include amphetamine-type stimulants and non-stimulant agents targeting monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems in the brain. However, these neurotransmitter systems are not restricted to the brain and are widely found throughout the body. Thus, while these agents can be effective in ameliorating ADHD symptoms, they also can produce adverse cardiovascular effects, such as increased heart rate and blood pressure. Existing treatments also affect eating habits and can reduce weight gain and growth in children and have been associated with suicidal ideation in adolescents and adults. In addition, approved stimulant treatments are DEA classified as controlled substances and present logistical issues for distribution and protection from diversion. Approved non-stimulant treatments, such as atomoxetine (Strattera® and its generic equivalents), can take four to eight weeks to become effective and undesirable side effects also have been observed.

Various investigators have generated data supporting the concept that alterations in AMPA receptor function might underlie the production of some of the symptoms of ADHD. In rodent and primate models of cognition, ampakines have been demonstrated to reduce inattention and impulsivity, two of the cardinal symptoms of ADHD. Furthermore, ampakines do not stimulate spontaneous locomotor activity in either mice or rats, unlike the stimulants presently used for the treatment of ADHD, nor do they increase the stimulation produced by amphetamine or cocaine. These preclinical considerations prompted us to conduct a randomized, double- blind, placebo controlled, two period crossover study to assess the efficacy and safety of CX717 in adults with ADHD.

In a repeated measures analysis, a statistically significant treatment effect on ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), the primary outcome measure, was observed after a three-week administration of CX717, 800 mg BID. Differences between this dose of CX717 and placebo were observed as early as week one of treatment and continued throughout the remainder of the study. The low dose of CX717, 200 mg BID, did not differ from placebo. In general, results from both the ADHD-RS hyperactivity and inattentiveness subscales, which were secondary efficacy variables, paralleled the results of the total score. CX717 was considered safe and well tolerated.

Based on these clinical results, ampakines such as CX717 or CX1739 might represent a breakthrough opportunity to develop a non-stimulating therapeutic for ADHD with the rapidity of onset normally seen with stimulants. Subject to raising sufficient financing (of which no assurance can be provided), we are planning to continue this program with a Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with adult ADHD using one of our two lead ampakine compounds.

AMPAkines as Treatment for SCI

Ampakines also may have potential utility in the treatment and management of SCI to enhance motor functions and improve the quality of life for SCI patients. An estimated 17,000 new cases of SCI occur each year in the United States, most a result of automobile accidents. Currently, there are roughly 282,000 people living with spinal cord injuries, which often produce impaired motor function.

SCI can profoundly impair neural plasticity leading to significant morbidity and mortality in human accident victims. Plasticity is a fundamental property of the nervous system that enables continuous alteration of neural pathways and synapses in response to experience or injury. A large body of literature exists regarding the ability of ampakines to stimulate neural plasticity, possibly due to an enhanced synthesis and secretion of various growth factors.

Recently, studies of acute intermittent hypoxia (“AIH”), exposure to short periods of low oxygen, in patients with SCI demonstrate that neural plasticity can be induced to improve motor function. This is based on the ability of spinal circuitry to learn how to adjust spinal and brainstem synaptic strength following repeated hypoxic bouts. Because AIH induces spinal plasticity, the potential exists to harness repetitive AIH as a means of inducing functional recovery of motor function following SCI.

The Company has been working with Dr. David Fuller, at the University of Florida with funding from NIH, to evaluate the use of ampakines for the treatment of compromised motor function in SCI. Using mice that have received spinal hemi-sections, CX717 was observed to increase motor nerve activity bilaterally. The effect on the hemisected side was greater than that measured on the intact side, with the recovery approximating that seen on the intact side prior to administration of ampakine. The doses of ampakines active in SCI were comparable to those demonstrating antagonism of OIRD, indicating target engagement of the AMPA receptors.

These animal models of motor nerve function following SCI support proof of concept for a new treatment paradigm using ampakines to improve motor functions in patients with SCI. With additional funding granted by NIH to Dr. Fuller, the Company is continuing its collaborative preclinical research with him while it is planning a clinical trial program focused on developing ampakines for the restoration of certain motor functions in patients with SCI. The Company is working with researchers at highly regarded clinical sites to finalize a Phase 2 clinical trial protocol. We believe that a clinical study could be initiated within several months of raising sufficient financing (of which no assurance can be provided).

34

GABAkines

The GABAkine program was recently established pursuant to the UWMRF Patent License Agreement that the Company entered into with UWMRF. At present, the program is focused on developing certain GABAkines with certain GABAA receptor subtype selectivity. We believe that there is a considerable degree of receptor subtype heterogeneity, making subtype selectivity of our compounds a desirable attribute.

Benzodiazepines (“BDZs”), such as Valium® (diazepam), Librium® (chlordiazepoxide) and Xanax® (alprazolam) were the first major class of drugs reported to act as GABAA PAMs, by binding at a site distinct from the binding site for GABA. These drugs produced a wide range of pharmacological properties, including anxiety reduction, sedation, hypnosis, anti-convulsant, muscle relaxation, respiratory depression, cognitive impairment, as well as tolerance, abuse and withdrawal. For this reason, it was not surprising that BDZs were observed to act as GABAA PAMs indiscriminately across all GABAAreceptor subtypes. Following the identification of BDZ binding sites on GABAA receptors, Dr. Lippa described CL218,872, the first non-BDZ to demonstrate that these receptors were heterogeneous by binding selectively to a subtype of GABAAreceptor. This demonstration of receptor heterogeneity led to the hypothesis that the various pharmacological actions of the BDZs might be separable depending on the receptor subtype involved. In animal testing, CL218,872 provided the proof of principle that such a separation could be achieved by displaying anti-anxiety and anti-convulsant properties in the absence of sedation, amnesia and muscular incoordination. These findings gave impetus to the search for novel therapeutic drugs for neurological and psychiatric illnesses that display improvements in efficacy and reductions in side effects.

Over the last several years, a group of scientists led by Dr. James Cook of the University of Wisconsin and Dr. Jeffrey Witkin affiliated with the Indiana University School of Medicine, who are advising us, have synthesized and tested a broad series of novel drugs that display GABAA receptor subtype selectivity and pharmacological specificity.

Certain of these chemical compounds are the subject of the UWMRF Patent License Agreement. Of these compounds, we have identified KRM-II-81 as a clinical lead. KRM-II-81 is the most advanced and druggable of a series of compounds that display certain receptor subtype selective and pharmacological specificity. In studies using cell cultures, brain tissues and whole animals, KRM-II-81 acts as a GABAA PAM at selective GABAA receptor subtypes that we feel are intimately involved in neuronal processes underlying epilepsy, pain, anxiety and certain other indications. KRM-II-81 has demonstrated highly desirable properties in animal models of these and other potential therapeutic indications, in the absence of or with greatly reduced liability to produce sedation, motor incoordination, cognitive impairments, respiratory depression, tolerance, abuse and withdrawal seizures, all side effects associated with BDZs. We currently are focused on the potential treatment of epilepsy and pain.

Epilepsy and Existing Treatments

Epilepsy is a chronic and highly prevalent neurological disorder that affects millions of people world-wide and has serious consequences for the life of the affected individual. A first-line approach to the control of epilepsy is through the administration of anticonvulsant drugs. Repeated, uncontrolled seizures and the side effects arising from seizure medications have a negative effect on the developing brain and can lead to brain cell loss and severe impairment of neurocognitive function. The continued occurrence of seizure activity also increases the probability of subsequent epileptic events through sensitization mechanisms called seizure kindling. Seizures that are unresponsive to anti-epileptic treatments are life-disrupting and life-threatening with broad health, life, and economic consequences.

Like many diseases, epilepsy is still remarkably underserved by currently available medicines. Pharmaco-resistance to anticonvulsant therapy continues to be one of the key obstacles to the treatment of epilepsy. Although many anticonvulsant drugs are approved to decrease seizure probability, seizures frequently are not fully controlled and patients are generally maintained daily on multiple antiepileptic drugs with the hope of enhancing the probability of seizure control. Despite this polypharmacy approach, as many as 60% to 70% of patients continue to have seizures. As a result of the lack of seizure control, pharmaco-resistant epilepsy patients, including young children, sometimes require and elect to have invasive therapeutic procedures such as surgical resection.

Despite the availability of a host of marketed drugs of different mechanistic classes, the lack of seizure control in patients is the primary factor driving the need for improved antiepileptic drugs emphasized by researchers and patient advocacy communities. Increasing inhibitory tone in the CNS through enhancement of GABAergic inhibition is a proven mechanism for seizure control. However, GABAergic medications also exhibit liabilities that limit their antiepileptic potential. Tolerance develops to GABAergic drugs such as BDZs, limiting their use in a chronic setting. These drugs can produce cognitive impairment, somnolence, sedation, tolerance and withdrawal seizures that create dosing limitations such that they are generally used only for acute convulsive episodes.

GABAkines as Treatments for Epilepsy

KRM-II-81 has demonstrated efficacy in multiple rodent models and measures of antiepileptic drug efficacy in vivo. This includes nine acute seizure provocation models in mice and rats, four seizure sensitization models in rats and mice, two models of chronic epilepsy, and three models specifically testing pharmaco-resistant antiepileptic drug efficacy. Because it appears to have a greatly reduced side effect liability, it might be possible to use higher, more effective doses that standard of care medications. Predictions of superior efficacy of KRM-II-81 over standard of care anti-epileptics comes from the efficacy of this compound across a broad range of animal models of epilepsy. Importantly, KRM-II-81 has been shown to be effective in models assessing pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. Under these conditions, KRM-II-81 is efficacious in cases where standard of care medicines do not work.

In the absence of seizure control by anti-epileptics, surgical resection of affected brain tissue is one potential alternative to help with the control of seizures. In the process of this surgery, epileptic brain tissue can become available for research into epileptic mechanisms and the identification of novel antiepileptic drugs. The anticonvulsant action of KRM-II-81 was confirmed by microelectrode recordings from slices obtained from freshly excised cortex from epileptic patients where KRM-II-81 suppressed epileptiform electrical activity. While preliminary, these translational data lend considerable support to the further development of KRM-II-81 for the treatment of epilepsy.

GABAkines as Treatments for Pain

It is impossible not to be aware of the crisis that the opioid epidemic has created in the treatment of chronic pain. While there is no question as to their efficacy, the clinical use of opioids is severely limited due to the rapid development of tolerance and the production of OIRD, the major cause of opioid-induced lethality. Research programs are underway nationwide to discover and develop new non-opioid drugs that are effective analgesics without the tolerance and abuse liability ascribed to opioids. Chronic pain is especially difficult to treat due to its complex nature with a variety of different etiologies. For example, chronic pain may be produced by injury, surgery, neuropathy, the inflammation produced by arthritis or by certain drugs such as cancer chemotherapeutics. For these reasons, better management and control of chronic pain continues to be a serious need in medical practice.

Data from both preclinical and clinical studies are consistent with the idea that GABAergic neurotransmission is an important regulatory mechanism for the control of pain. gabapentin (Neurontin®) and pregabalin (Lyrica®) two commonly used drugs for the treatment of chronic pain are believed to produce their analgesic effects by enhancing GABAergic neurotransmission. However, although they have received FDA approval, the clinical results have not been overwhelming. In a published review of 37 clinical trials with a total of 5,914 patients experiencing neuropathic pain there was no difference in the percentage of patients experiencing pain reduction of greater than 50% when comparing gabapentin to placebo. The most common side effects produced by gabapentin were sedation, dizziness and problems walking. It is uncertain whether greater efficacy was not observed because of poor intrinsic pharmacological efficacy or insufficient dosages due to dose limiting side effects.

An alternate approach to enhancing GABAergic neurotransmission is the use of GABAA PAMs. This approach has been under-utilized because of the general lack of efficacy of the BDZ PAMs. However, a strong case for the potential value of subtype selective GABAAPAMs for the treatment of pain can be made. First, GABAA receptor regulated pathways are integral to pain processing with α2/3 containing GABAA receptor subtypes present on nerve pathways modulating pain sensation and perception. Second, we believe that the analgesic properties of BDZs may be masked by concurrent activation of other receptor subtypes that mediate the side effects. Diazepam has been reported to produce maximal analgesia if the side effects are attenuated by GABAAsubtype genetic manipulation. Third, predecessor GABAkines, made by Dr. Cook, that selectively amplify GABAA receptor subtype signaling are effective in pain models in rodents at doses lower than those producing motor side effects.

In a number of laboratory procedures and animal studies, KRM-II-81 has been shown to selectively bind to GABAA receptor subtypes and enhance GABAergic neurotransmission. Sub-chronic dosing for 22 days with KRM-II-81 and the structural analogue, MP-III-80, demonstrated enduring analgesic efficacy without tolerance development. In contrast, tolerance developed to the analgesic effects of gabapentin. At a dose that produces maximal analgesic effect in an inflammatory chronic pain model, KRM-II-81 does not substitute for the BDZ midazolam in a drug discrimination assay, suggesting a reduced abuse liability. Furthermore, KRM-II-81 did not produce the respiratory depression observed with alprazolam, a major problem with BDZs leading to emergency room visits and overdose.

We believe that the ability to attenuate both acute and chronic pain combined with a greatly reduced side effect profile, a lack of tolerance and a reduced abuse potential makes KRM-II-81 a promising clinical lead and a potential advance in pain therapeutics. Results from preliminary chemistry, metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies support its further development.

Financing our Business Units

Our major challenge has been to raise substantial equity or equity-linked financing to support research and development plans for our cannabinoid and neuromodulator platforms under ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx, respectively, while minimizing the dilutive effect to pre-existing stockholders. At present, we believe that we are hindered primarily by our public corporate structure, our OTCQB listing, and low market capitalization as a result of our low stock price.

For this reason, the Company is considering an internal restructuring plan that contemplates spinning out our two drug platforms under ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx into separate operating businesses or subsidiaries. We believe that by creating one or more subsidiaries, it may be possible, through separate finance channels, to optimize the asset values of both the cannabinoid platform and the neuromodulator platform. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Development Plan for ResolutionRx” for a discussion of our proposed ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform subsidiary.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $1,762,855 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $2,115,033 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 respectively, as well as negative operating cash flows of $106,448 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $487,745 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The Company also had a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,846,748 at June 30, 2020 and expects to continue to incur net losses and negative operating cash flows for at least the next few years. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its audit report on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is currently, and has for some time, been in significant financial distress. It has extremely limited cash resources and current assets and has no ongoing source of sustainable revenue. Management is continuing to address various aspects of the Company’s operations and obligations, including, without limitation, debt obligations, financing requirements, establishment of new and maintenance and improvement of existing and in-process intellectual property, licensing agreements, legal and patent matters and regulatory compliance, and has taken steps to continue to raise new debt and equity capital to fund the Company’s business activities from both related and unrelated parties to fund the Company’s business activities.

The Company is continuing its efforts to raise additional capital in order to be able to pay its liabilities and fund its business activities on a going forward basis, including the pursuit of the Company’s planned research and development activities. The Company regularly evaluates various measures to satisfy the Company’s liquidity needs, including development and other agreements with collaborative partners and, when necessary, seeking to exchange or restructure the Company’s outstanding securities. The Company is evaluating certain changes to its operations and structure to facilitate raising capital from sources that may be interested in financing only discrete aspects of the Company’s development programs. Such changes could include a significant reorganization, which may include the formation of one or more subsidiaries into which one or more of our programs may be contributed. As a result of the Company’s current financial situation, the Company has limited access to external sources of debt and equity financing. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to secure additional financing in the amounts necessary to fully fund its operating and debt service requirements. If the Company is unable to access sufficient cash resources, the Company may be forced to discontinue its operations entirely and liquidate.

37

Competition

The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by intensive research efforts, rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary therapeutics. Our competitors include many companies, have active projectsresearch institutes and universities that are working in these areas.a number of pharmaceutical or biotechnology disciplines to develop therapeutic products similar to those we are currently investigating. Most of these competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and/or other resources than we do. In addition, many of our competitors have experience in performing human clinical trials of new or improved therapeutic products and obtaining approvals from the FDA and other regulatory agencies. We have no experience in conducting and managing later-stage clinical testing or in preparing applications necessary to obtain regulatory approvals. Accordingly, it is possible that our competitors may succeed in developing products that are safer or more effective than those that we are developing and may obtain FDA approvals for their products faster than we can. We expect that competition in this field will continue to intensify.

We may be unable to recruit and retain our senior management and other key technical personnel on whom we are dependent.Regulation

We are highly dependent upon senior management and key technical personnel and currently do not carry any insurance policies on such persons. In particular, we are highly dependent on our Executive Chairman, Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.; our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.; our Vice President of Preclinical Development, Steven A. Johnson, Ph.D.; and our Senior Director of Medicinal Chemistry, Leslie J. Street, Ph.D., all of whom have entered into employment agreements with us. Competition for qualified employees among pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies is intense. The loss of any of our senior management, or our inability to attract, retain and motivate the additional highly-skilled employees and consultants that our business requires, could substantially hurt our business and prospects.

The regulatory approval process is expensive, time consuming, uncertain and may prevent us from obtaining required approvals for the commercialization of some of our products.

The FDA and other similar agencies in foreign countries have substantial requirements for therapeutic products. Such requirements often involve lengthy and detailed laboratory, clinical and post-clinical testing procedures and are expensive to complete. It often takes companies many years to satisfy these requirements, depending on the complexity and novelty of the product. The review process is also extensive, which may delay the approval process even more. Accordingfurther. Failure to comply with applicable FDA or other requirements may subject a company to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, a clinical hold, warning letters, recall or seizure of products, partial or total suspension of production, withdrawal of the product from the market, injunctions, fines, civil penalties or criminal prosecution.

FDA approval is required before any new drug or dosage form, including the new use of a previously approved drug, can be marketed in the United States. Other similar agencies in foreign countries also impose substantial requirements.

The process of developing drug candidates normally begins with a discovery process of potential candidates that are then initially tested in in vitro and in vivo non-human animal (preclinical) studies which include, but are not limited to toxicity and other safety related studies, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion). Once sufficient preclinical data are obtained, a company must submit an IND and receive authorization from the FDA in order to begin clinical trials in the United States. Successful drug candidates then move into human studies that are characterized generally as Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3. Phase 1 studies seeking safety and other data normally utilize healthy volunteers. Phase 2 studies utilize one or more prospective patient populations and are designed to establish safety and preliminary measures of efficacy. Sometimes studies may be referred to as Phase 2A and 2B depending on the size of the patient population. Phase 3 studies are large trials in the targeted patient population, performed in multiple centers, often for longer periods of time and are designed to establish statistically significant efficacy as well as safety in the larger population. Most often the FDA and similar regulatory agencies in other countries require two confirmatory Phase 3 or pivotal studies. Upon completion of both the preclinical and clinical phases, a New Drug Application (“NDA”) is filed with the FDA or a similar filing is made to the Pharmaceutical Researchregulatory authority in other countries. NDA filings are extensive and Manufacturersinclude the data from all prior studies. These filings are reviewed by the FDA and, only if approved, may the company or its partners commence marketing of America, historically the costnew drug in the United States.

There also are variations of developingthese procedures. For example, companies seeking approval for new indications for an already approved drug may choose to pursue an abbreviated approval process such as the filing for an NDA under Section 505(b)(2). Another example would be a new pharmaceutical from discoverySupplementary NDA (“SNDA”). A third example would be an Abbreviated NDA (“ANDA”) claiming bio-equivalence to an already approved drug and claiming the same indications such as in the case of generic drugs. Other opportunities allow for accelerated review and approval was approximately $800 million,based upon several factors, including potential fast-track status for serious medical conditions and this amountunmet medical needs, potential breakthrough therapy designation of the drug for serious conditions where preliminary evidence shows that the drug may show substantial improvement over available therapy or orphan designation (generally, an orphan indication in the United States is expected to increase annually.one with a patient population of less than 200,000).

As of yet, we have not obtained any approvals to market our products. Further, we cannot assure you that the FDA or other regulatory agency will grant us approval for any of our products on a timely basis, if at all. Even if regulatory clearances are obtained, a marketed product is subject to continual review, and later discovery of previously unknown problems may result in restrictions on marketing or withdrawal of the product from the market.

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has made it very difficult to recruit subjects and patients and to conduct clinical trials in general. Given the public health emergency during the winter and spring of 2020, the FDA issued guidance to be implemented without the normal prior public comment period as the FDA had concluded that public participation would not be feasible or appropriate. Guidance is not legally enforceable, but the FDA recommends the following of its guidance. Challenges are expected to arise from quarantines, site closures, travel limitations, interruptions to the supply chain for investigational products, or other considerations if site personnel or trial subjects become infected with COVID-19. These challenges may lead to difficulties in meeting protocol-specified procedures. The FDA emphasized that safety of trial participants is critically important. Decisions to continue or discontinue individual patients or the trial are expected to be made by trial sponsors in consultation with clinical investors and Institutional Review Boards. COVID-19 screening procedures may need to be implemented. As challenging as the clinical trial process is during normal times, the risks, strategic and operational challenges and the costs of conducting such trials has increased substantially during the pandemic. See the section titled “Risk Factors” for more information on this and other risks to the Company.

Manufacturing

We have no experience or capability to either manufacture bulk quantities of the new compounds that we develop, or to produce finished dosage forms of the compounds, such as tablets or capsules. We rely, and presently intend to continue to rely, on the manufacturing and quality control expertise of contract manufacturing organizations (see below with respect to dronabinol) or current and prospective corporate partners. There is no assurance that we will be able to enter into manufacturing arrangements to produce bulk quantities of our compounds on favorable financial terms. There is generally, absent any disruptions that may be caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, substantial availability of both bulk chemical manufacturing and dosage form manufacturing capability throughout the world that we believe we can readily access.

On September 4, 2018, the Company entered into a dronabinol Development and Supply Agreement with Noramco Inc., one of the world’s major dronabinol manufacturers. Noramco subsequently assigned this agreement (as assigned, the “Purisys Agreement”) to its subsidiary, Purisys, LLC (“Purisys”). Under the terms of the Purisys Agreement, Purisys agreed to (i) provide all of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) estimated to be needed for the clinical development process for both the first- and second-generation products (each a “Product” and collectively, the “Products”), three validation batches for New Drug Application (“NDA”) filing(s) and adequate supply for the initial inventory stocking for the wholesale and retail channels, subject to certain limitations, (ii) maintain or file valid drug master files (“DMFs”) with the FDA or any other regulatory authority and provide the Company with access or a right of reference letter entitling the Company to make continuing reference to the DMFs during the term of the agreement in connection with any regulatory filings made with the FDA by the Company, (iii) participate on a development committee, and (iv) make available its regulatory consultants, collaborate with any regulatory consulting firms engaged by the Company and participate in all FDA or Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) meetings as appropriate and as related to the API.

In consideration for these supplies and services, the Company has agreed to purchase exclusively from Purisys during the commercialization phase all API for its Products as defined in the Purisys Agreement at a pre-determined price subject to certain producer price adjustments and agreed to Purisys’s participation in the economic success of the commercialized Products up to the earlier of the achievement of a maximum dollar amount or the expiration of a period of time.

See “Risk Factors—Risks Related To Our Securitiesrelated to our business—We are at an early stage of development and we may not be able to successfully develop and commercialize our products and technologies” for a discussion of certain risks related to the development and commercialization of our products.

39

Our stock price may be volatile and our common stock could decline in value.Marketing

Our common stock is currently quoted on

We have no experience in the OTC Bulletin Boardmarketing of pharmaceutical products and isdo not actively traded, whichanticipate having the resources to distribute and broadly market any products that we may increase price quotation volatility and could limitdevelop. We will therefore continue to seek commercial development arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies for our product candidates for those indications that require significant sales forces to effectively market. In entering into such arrangements, we may seek to retain the liquidityright to promote or co-promote products for certain of the common stock, allorphan drug indications in North America. We believe that there is a significant expertise base for such marketing and sales functions within the pharmaceutical industry and expect that we could recruit such expertise if we choose to directly market a drug.

See “Risk Factors—Risks related to our business—We are at an early stage of whichdevelopment and we may adversely affectnot be able to successfully develop and commercialize our products and technologies” for a discussion of certain risks related to the market price of the common stock and our ability to raise additional capital.

The market price of securities of life sciences companies in general has been very unpredictable. The range of sales pricesmarketing of our common stock for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, as quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board and NYSE Amex (formerly The American Stock Exchange), was $0.09 to $0.25, $0.07 to $0.63, and $0.41 to $1.24, respectively. The following factors, in addition to factors that affect that market generally, could significantly impact our business, and the market price of our common stock could decline:products.

 

competitors announcing technological innovations or new commercial products;

competitors’ publicity regarding actual or potential products under development;

regulatory developments in the U.S. and foreign countries;

developments concerning proprietary rights, including patent litigation;

public concern over the safety of therapeutic products; and

changes in healthcare reimbursement policies and healthcare regulations.

You may experience dilution of your ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock.Employees

As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately 78.9 million shares2020, the Company employed five people (all officers), three of our common stock outstanding.

whom were full time. The Company periodically engages certain contractors with domain expertise who provide services such as biostatistics, regulatory consulting and other services, to the Company.

If all warrantsTechnology Rights

University of Illinois License Agreement

On June 27, 2014, the Company entered into the UIC License Agreement with the UIC. The UIC License Agreement granted the Company (i) exclusive rights to several issued and options outstandingpending patents in several jurisdictions and (ii) the non-exclusive right to certain technical information that is generated by UIC in connection with certain clinical trials as of September 30, 2010 are exercised prior to their expiration, up to approximately 37 million additional shares of our common stock could become freely tradable. Sales of substantial amounts of common stockspecified in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market priceUIC License Agreement, all of our common stock and could also make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of common stock.

Our charter document and shareholder rights plan may prevent or delay an attempt by our stockholders to replace or remove management.

Certain provisions of our second restated certificate of incorporation could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if such change in control would be beneficial to our stockholders. Our second restated certificate of incorporation allows our Board of Directors, referred to as the Board or Board of Directors, to issue up to 3,507,500 shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval. Pursuant to this authority, in February 2002 our Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan and declared a dividend of a right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of preferred stock for each outstanding share of our common stock. The ability of our Board of Directors to issue additional preferred stock and our shareholder rights plan may have the effect of delaying or preventing an attempt by our stockholders to replace or remove existing directors and management.

Applicable SEC rules governing the trading of “penny stocks” limits the trading and liquidity of our common stock which may affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, and trades below $5.00 per share; therefore, the common stock is considered a “penny stock” and subject to SEC rules and regulations which impose limitations upon the manner in which such shares may be publicly traded. These regulations require the delivery, before any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure explaining the penny stock market and the associated risks. Under these regulations, certain brokers who recommend such securities to persons other than established customers or certain accredited investors must make a special written suitability determination regarding such purchaser and receive such purchaser’s written agreement of a transaction before a sale. In addition, margin regulations prevent low-priced stocks such as ours from being used as collateral for brokers’ margin loans to investors. These regulations have the effect of limiting the trading activity of our common stock and reducing the liquidity of an investment in our common stock.

We do not expect any cash dividends to be paid on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our common stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future. We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fund business growth. Consequently, stockholders’ only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment is if the price of our common stock appreciates and they sell their shares at a profit. We cannot assure stockholders of a positive return on their investment when they sell their shares, nor can we assure that stockholders will not lose the entire amount of their investment.

Risks Related To This Offering

Since we have broad discretion in how we use the proceeds from this offering, we may use the proceeds in ways in which you disagree.

We have not allocated specific amounts of the net proceeds from this offering for any specific purpose. Accordingly, our management will have significant flexibility in applying the net proceeds of this offering. You will be relying on the judgment of our management with regardrelate to the use of thesecannabinoids for the treatment of sleep-related breathing disorders. As discussed above, the Company is developing dronabinol (a synthetic form of Δ9-THC) for the treatment of OSA, the most common form of sleep apnea.

The UIC License Agreement provides for various commercialization and reporting requirements that commenced on June 30, 2015. In addition, the UIC License Agreement provides for various royalty payments, including a royalty on net proceeds,sales of 4%, payment on sub-licensee revenues of 12.5%, and you will not havea minimum annual royalty beginning in 2015 of $100,000, which is due and payable on December 31 of each year beginning on December 31, 2015. The minimum annual royalty obligation of $100,000 due on December 31, 2019, was extended to June 30, 2020 and further extended to July 7, 2020 when the opportunity, as partobligation was paid. One-time milestone payments may become due based upon the achievement of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. It is possible that the net proceedscertain development milestones. $350,000 will be investeddue within five days after the dosing of the first patient is a Phase III human clinical trial anywhere in the world. $500,000 will be due within five days after the first NDA filing with FDA or a foreign equivalent. $1,000,000 will be due within twelve months of the first commercial sale. One-time royalty payments may also become due and payable. Annual royalty payments may also become due. In the year after the first application for market approval is submitted to the FDA or a foreign equivalent and until approval is obtained, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $150,000. In the year after the first market approval is obtained from the FDA or a foreign equivalent and until the first sale of a product, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $200,000. In the year after the first commercial sale of a product, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $250,000.

UWMRF Patent License Agreement

On August 1, 2020, the Company exercised its option pursuant to its option agreement dated March 2, 2020, between the Company and UWMRF. Upon exercise, the Company and UWMRF executed the UWMRF Patent License Agreement, effective August 1, 2020, pursuant to which the Company licensed the intellectual property identified therein, including patent rights, technology rights and improvements, on a worldwide basis.

In consideration for the licenses granted, the Company will pay to UWMRF the following: (i) patent filing and prosecution costs incurred by UWMRF prior to the effective date, which totaled $60,370 as of January 14, 2020, paid in three yearly installments with 25% payable twelve months after the effective date, 25% payable twenty-four months after the effective date, and the remaining 50% payable thirty-six months after the effective date; (ii) annual license maintenance fees, beginning on the second anniversary of the effective date, which annual maintenance fees vary from year-to-year from the second anniversary date through the fifth anniversary date, with the amount due on the fifth anniversary being due each anniversary date thereafter until such payments terminate upon the Company’s payment of royalties pursuant to clause (iv) below; (iii) one-time milestone payments, paid upon the occurrence of certain dosing events of patients during clinical trials and certain approvals by the FDA, with the first to be paid upon the dosing of the first patient in a wayPhase II clinical trial, the second to be paid upon the dosing of the first patient in a Phase III clinical trial, and the final milestone payment to be paid upon approval by the FDA of a NDA; and (iv) annual royalties on net sales of patented products and other products as described and defined in the UWMRF Patent License Agreement, subject to reduction due to royalty stacking provisions, and subject also to annual minimum royalties after the first commercial sale of a licensed product, which annual minimums increase in two year increments until they reach a fixed amount in year six and thereafter. The Company has also granted UWMRF stock appreciation rights providing UWMRF with the right to receive an amount equal to 4.9% of the consideration received upon the sale or assignment of one or more of the neuromodulator programs above $1 per program. The Company must provide UWMRF with an annual development plan by September 30, 2021 and each September 30th thereafter. The UWMRF Patent License Agreement will expand the Company’s neuromodulator platform, which has historically included the Company’s AMPAkine program and now includes a GABAkine program as well. That platform, as expanded, is now called EndeavourRx.

Transactions with Bausch Health Companies

Beginning in March 2010, the Company entered into a series of asset purchase and license agreements with Biovail Laboratories International SRL, which after its merger with Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. was later renamed Bausch Health Companies Inc. (“Bausch”).

In March 2011, the Company entered into a new agreement with Bausch to re-acquire the AMPAkine compounds, patents and rights that Bausch had acquired from the Company in March 2010. The new agreement provided for potential future payments of up to $15,150,000 by the Company based upon the achievement of certain developments, including NDA submissions and approval milestones pertaining to an intravenous dosage form of the AMPAkine compounds for respiratory depression, a therapeutic area not currently pursued by the Company. Bausch is also eligible to receive additional payments of up to $15,000,000 from the Company based upon the Company’s net sales of an intravenous dosage form of these compounds for respiratory depression.

University of Alberta License Agreement and Research Agreement

By letter dated May 18, 2018, the Company received notice from counsel claiming to represent TEC Edmonton and The Governors of the University of Alberta, which purported to terminate, effective December 12, 2017, the license agreement dated May 9, 2007 between the Company and The Governors of the University of Alberta. The Company, through its counsel, disputed any grounds for termination and notified the representative that it invoked Section 13 of that license agreement, which mandates a meeting to be attended by individuals with decision-making authority to attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution to the dispute. In February 2019, the Company and TEC Edmonton tentatively agreed to terms acceptable to all parties to establish a new license agreement and the form of a new license agreement. However, after reaching that tentative Agreement, the Company re-evaluated that portion of its AMPAkine program and has decided not to enter into a new agreement at this time. The lack of entry into a new agreement at this time does not yield a favorable, or any, return for us. The failure of our managementaffect the Company’s other AMPAkine programs and permits the Company to use such funds effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

You will experience immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering.

You will incur immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering. After giving effectreallocate resources to the sale by us of up tounits offered in this offering at an assumed offering price of $per unit, and after deducting the placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us, investors in this offering can expect an immediate dilution of $per share, or%, at the assumed public offering price, assuming no exercise of the warrants. See “Dilution” on page 14 for a more detailed discussion of the dilution you will incur in this offering.

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the statements contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and we intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. These statements are based on the current expectations, forecasts, and assumptions of our management and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are sometimes identified by language such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “projects,” “future” and similar expressions and may also include references to plans, strategies, objectives, and anticipated future performance as well as other statements that are not strictly historical in nature. The risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in this prospectus include,programs, including, but are not limited to those noted underADHD, SCI, FXS and CNS-driven disorders.

Research and Development Expenses

The Company invested $308,466 in research and development in the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 4 ofsix months ended June 30, 2020. Of that amount, $244,800 was incurred with related parties. See our condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2020, included in this prospectus. Readers should carefully review this information as well the risks

The Company invested $599,329 and other uncertainties described$688,285 in other filings we may make after the date of this prospectusresearch and development in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Of those amounts, $490,908 and $495,638 were incurred with the Securitiesrelated parties in 2019 and Exchange Commission.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. They reflect opinions, assumptions, and estimates only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking2018, respectively. See our consolidated financial statements in this prospectus, whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances, or otherwise.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds of this offering, after deducting placements agent fees and our estimated offering expenses, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the warrants issued in this offering, will be approximately $if we sell the maximum number of units.

We currently intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and for general corporate purposes, which may include, among other things, funding development of our AMPAKINE technology, licensing activities and capital expenditures.

We cannot estimate precisely the allocation of the net proceeds from this offering among these uses. The amounts and timing of the expenditures may vary significantly, depending on numerous factors, including the progress of our clinical trials and other development efforts as well as the amount of cash used in our operations. Accordingly, our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds of this offering. We reserve the right to change the use of proceeds as a result of certain contingencies such as competitive developments, opportunities to acquire technologies or products and other factors. Pending the uses described above, we may temporarily invest the net proceeds of this offering in short- and medium-term interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Effective December 4, 2009, our common stock began quoting on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, referred to as OTC Bulletin Board or OTCBB, under the symbol “CORX.OB”. Prior to that date, our common stock traded on the NYSE Amex (formerly The American Stock Exchange) under the symbol “COR”. The following table presents quarterly information on the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 (through January 19, 2011, December 31, 20102019 and 2009, as furnished by the OTCBB or NYSE Amex, as applicable. The quotations on the OTCBB reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.2018, included in this prospectus.

 

   High   Low 

Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2011

    

First Quarter (through January 19, 2011)

  $0.19    $0.17  

Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2010

    

Fourth Quarter

  $0.21    $0.15  

Third Quarter

   0.18     0.14  

Second Quarter

   0.24     0.16  

First Quarter

   0.25     0.09  

Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2009

    

Fourth Quarter

  $0.22    $0.07  

Third Quarter

   0.32     0.18  

Second Quarter

   0.44     0.19  

First Quarter

   0.63     0.25  
41

The high and low sales prices for our common stock on January 19, 2011, as quoted on the OTCBB, were $0.17 and $0.19, respectively.

HoldersDescription of Property

As of January 13, 2011, there were 402 record holders of our common stock,September 30, 2020, the Company did not own any real property or maintain any leases with respect to real property. The Company periodically contracts for services provided at the facilities owned by third parties and approximately 10,000 beneficial owners.may, from time-to-time, have employees who work in these facilities.

DividendsLegal Proceedings

We

By letter dated February 5, 2016, the Company received a demand from a law firm representing Salamandra, LLC (“Salamandra”) alleging $146,082 due and owing for unpaid services rendered. On January 18, 2017, following an arbitration proceeding in the Superior Court of New Jersey, an arbitrator awarded Salamandra the full amount sought. Additionally, the arbitrator granted Salamandra’s attorneys’ fees and costs of $47,937. All such amounts have never paid or declaredbeen accrued at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, including accrued interest at 4.5% annually from February 26, 2018, the date of the judgment, through June 30, 2020, totaling $20,736.

On December 16, 2019, the Company and Salamandra entered into an amendment to the settlement agreement and release, executed August 21, 2019 (the “Original Settlement Agreement” and as amended, the “Amended Settlement Agreement”) regarding $202,395 owed by the Company to Salamandra (as reduced by any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intendfurther payments by the Company to retain any future earnings to financeSalamandra, the growth and development“Full Amount”) in connection with the arbitration award previously granted in favor of our business, and we do not expectSalamandra. Under the terms of the Original Settlement Agreement, the Company was to pay any cash dividendsSalamandra $125,000 on our common stockor before November 30, 2019 in full satisfaction of the Full Amount owed, subject to conditions regarding the Company’s ability to raise certain dollar amounts of working capital. Under the Amended Settlement Agreement, (i) the Company was to pay and the Company paid to Salamandra $25,000 on or before December 21, 2019, (ii) upon such payment, Salamandra ceased all collection efforts against the Company until March 31, 2020 (the “Threshold Date”), and (iii) the Company was to pay to Salamandra $100,000 on or before the Threshold Date if the Company had at that time raised $600,000 in working capital. Such payments by the Company would have constituted satisfaction of the Full Amount owed and would have served as consideration for the dismissal of the action underlying the arbitration award and the mutual releases set forth in the foreseeable future. PaymentAmended Settlement Agreement. If the Company had raised less than $600,000 in working capital before the Threshold Date, the Company was to pay to Salamandra an amount equal to 21% of future dividends,the working capital amount raised, in which case such payment would have reduced the Full Amount owed on a dollar-for-dollar basis, and Salamandra would then have been able to seek collection on the remainder of the debt. The Company made the initial payment of $25,000 in December 2019, but did not make the subsequent required payment on March 31, 2020, nor has any payment been made during the three-months ended June 30, 2020. The Company has initiated further discussions with the intent of reaching a revised settlement agreement which cannot be assured.

By email dated July 21, 2016, the Company received a demand from an investment banking consulting firm that represented the Company in 2012 in conjunction with the Pier transaction alleging that $225,000 is due and payable for investment banking services rendered. Such amount has been included in accrued expenses at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

On February 21, 2020, Sharp Clinical Services, Inc. ("Sharp"), a vendor of the Company, filed a complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Bergen County related to a December 16, 2019 demand for payment of past due invoices inclusive of late fees totaling $103,890 of which $3,631 relates to late fees, seeking $100,259 plus 1.5% interest per month on outstanding unpaid invoices. Amid settlement discussions, the vendor stated on March 13, 2020 its intent to proceed to a default judgment against the Company, and the Company stated on March 14, 2020 its intent to continue settlement discussions. On May 29, 2020, a default was entered against the Company, and on September 4, 2020, a final judgment by default was entered against the Company in the amount of $104,217.37.

The Company is periodically the subject of various pending and threatened legal actions and claims. In the opinion of management of the Company, adequate provision has been made in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 with respect to such matters, including, specifically, the matters noted above. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself if any will be atof the discretionmatters described above results in the filing of our Board of Directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, restrictions under Delaware law and in currenta lawsuit or future financing instruments and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.

formal claim.

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of September 30, 2010:

on an actual basis; and

 43 

on an as adjusted basis to reflect our sale of theunits offered by us at an assumed public offering price of $per unit, after deducting estimated placement agent discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs payable by us.

You should read the following table in conjunction with “Management’s

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

   As of September 30, 2010 
   Actual  Pro Forma 
   (unaudited) 
   (in thousands, except share data) 

Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments

  $4,508   $   
         

Long-term obligations, less current portion

  $19   $   

Stockholders’ equity:

   

Common stock; $0.001 par value per share; 205,000,000 shares authorized and 78,858,197 issued and outstanding, actual; 205,000,000 shares authorized and            shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted

   79   

Preferred stock; $0.001 par value per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized and 37,500 issued and outstanding, actual

   21   

Additional paid-in capital

   120,774   

Unrealized gain, available for sale marketable securities

   1   

Deficit accumulated during development stage

   (117,530 
         

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

   3,345   
         

Total capitalization

  $3,364   $   
         

The table above excludes:

12,553,089 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding prior to this offering under our equity incentive plans, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.32 per share;

2,897,178 shares of common stock available for future grants under our equity incentive plans;

350,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding prior to this offering granted outside of our equity incentive plans, at a weighted average exercise price of $2.59 per share;

3,679 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock, at a conversion price of $6.795 per share;

24,126,952 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding prior to this offering, at a weighted average exercise price of $0.74 per share;

shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants to be issued to purchasers in this offering, at an exercise price of $per share; andOperations

shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants to be issued to the placement agent in connection with this offering, at an exercise price of $per share.

DILUTION

Purchasers of units offered by this prospectus will suffer immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book value per share of common stock. Our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2010 was approximately $3,345,000, or approximately $0.04 per share of common stock. Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2010.

Dilution in net tangible book value per share represents the difference between the amount per unit paid by purchasers in this offering, assuming no value is attributed to the warrants, and the net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering. After giving effect to our sale ofunits in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $, and after deducting the placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2010 would have been approximately $, or $per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase of $in net tangible book value per share of common stock to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value ofper share of common stock to purchasers of units in this offering. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:

 

Assumed public offering price per unit

  

Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010

  $0.04  

Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to this offering

  

Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010, after giving effect to this offering

  

Dilution in net tangible book value per share to new investors

  

Investors may experience additional dilution upon exerciseOverview

The mission of the warrants offered by us.

The above table is based on 78,858,197 shares of our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and excludes, as of September 30, 2010:

12,533,089 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding prior to this offering under our equity incentive plans, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.32 per share;

2,897,178 shares of common stock available for future grants under our equity incentive plans;

350,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding prior to this offering granted outside of our equity incentive plans, at a weighted average exercise price of $2.59 per share;

3,679 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock, at a conversion price of $6.795 per share;

24,126,952 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding prior to this offering, at a weighted average exercise price of $0.74 per share;

shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants to be issued to purchasers in this offering, at an exercise price of $per share; and

shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants to be issued to the placement agent in connection with this offering, at an exercise price of $per share.

To the extent that any existing options or warrants are exercised, new options are issued under our equity incentive plans, or we otherwise issue additional shares of common stock in the future, there may be further dilution to new investors in this offering.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

About Cortex Pharmaceuticals

We are engaged in the discovery and development of innovative pharmaceuticals for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, neurological diseases and sleep apnea. Our primary focusCompany is to develop novel small moleculesinnovative and revolutionary treatments to combat diseases caused by disruption of neuronal signaling. We are developing treatment options that address conditions affecting millions of people, but for which there are few or poor treatment options, including OSA, ADHD, epilepsy, chronic pain and recovery from SCI. The Company is developing a pipeline of new drug product candidates based on our broad patent portfolios for two drug platforms: (i) pharmaceutical cannabinoids, which include dronabinol, a synthetic form of THC that acts upon the nervous system’s endogenous cannabinoid receptors and (ii) neuromodulators, which include ampakines and GABAkines, proprietary compounds that, as PAMs, positively modulate AMPA-type glutamate receptors and GABAAreceptors, respectively. Due to insufficient funding, we do not currently have any active clinical trials and only limited operations.

Product Development Plans

In order to facilitate our business activities and product development, we are organizing our drug platforms into two separate business units. The business unit focused on pharmaceutical cannabinoids is named ResolutionRx and the business unit focused on neuromodulators is named EndeavourRx. It is anticipated that the Company will use, at least initially, its management personnel to provide management, operational and oversight services to these two business units. Below is a complexdescription of proteins involvedthe Company’s product development plans within these business units. Please see the section titled “The Business of the Company” in communication between nerve cellsthis prospectus for background information on these business units.

ResolutionRx – Dronabinol program

For the dronabinol program within our ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform, the Company plans to manufacture, on a pilot scale, one or more new proprietary formulations of dronabinol with the enhanced properties described in our patent applications, for which we plan to spend approximately $150,000 to bench test in vitro several versions of dronabinol formulations in order to determine those with the best physico-chemical properties. To finance these efforts, the Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” of this prospectus for more information.

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company intends to spend approximately $450,000 to $600,000 of these funds on the continued development of a proprietary formulation of dronabinol. This development would include (i) improvements to the Company’s intellectual property position, (ii) improvements to our dronabinol formulation’s PK profile, (iii) improvements to regulatory compliance, and (iv) expenditures for the initial stocking of clinical supply, packaging and distribution in anticipation of a Phase 2 PK/PD clinical trial and a pivotal Phase 3 clinical study. The performance of the Phase 2 PK/PD clinical trial and Phase 3 clinical study, however, would need yet additional funds either from separate financings or a collaboration with a strategic partner.

EndeavourRx – AMPAkines program

For the AMPAkines program within our EndeavourRx neuromodulators platform, the Company plans to initiate clinical testing of our AMPAkines in the mammalian brain. Wetreatment of SCI. To this end, approximately $145,000 would be utilized to assess the purity of our existing drug supplies and finalize a clinical trial protocol for a Phase 2A clinical trial to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic (“PK”) properties of one of our lead AMPAkines in patients who have had SCI. These tasks are developingcritical for applying to the FDA for permission to amend our existing IND or initiate a familynew IND enabling the commencement of proprietary pharmaceuticals knownclinical trials. To finance these efforts, the Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” of this prospectus for more information.

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company would continue to focus on SCI, as AMPAKINE® compounds, which enhancewe believe it would be the activitymost efficient expenditure of our resources and yield an actionable result in the shortest period of time. Expenditures would include: (i) an estimated spend of $200,000 for chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) efforts, depending on the assessment of our drug supplies, (ii) an estimated spend of $400,000 on an initial Phase 2A single ascending dose safety and PK and pharmacodynamic (“PD”) study in human SCI patients, (iii) an estimated spend of $600,000 on a Phase 2A multiple ascending dose safety and PK and PD study in SCI patients, and (iv) an estimated spend of $650,000 on a Phase 2B efficacy study in SCI patients. Our anticipated spend for ADHD would be approximately $100,000 with the larger spends occurring later dependent upon availability of financing.

EndeavourRx – GABAkines program

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company plans to finance efforts with respect to the GABAkines program within our EndeavourRx neuromodulators platform. These efforts would be in preparation of an IND to be submitted to the FDA to commence human studies of KRM-II-81, our lead GABAkine drug candidate, for treatment-resistant epilepsy, and expenditures would include (i) an estimated spend of $530,000 for CMC efforts, (ii) an estimated spend of $450,000 for pre-clinical pharmacology, safety and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (“ADME”) studies, (iii) an estimated spend of $225,000 for animal safety studies and (iv) an estimated spend of $65,000 for regulatory consultants.

In connection with the organization and development of the AMPA receptor. We believeResolutionRx and EndeavourRx business units, we are planning certain corporate and development actions as summarized below. All of the below are subject to raising additional financing and/or entering into strategic relationships, of which no assurance can be given.

Proposed Creation of Subsidiaries

Pending approval by the Board, management intends to organize our ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx business units into two subsidiaries: (i) a ResolutionRx subsidiary, into which we intend to contribute our pharmaceutical cannabinoid platform and its related tangible and intangible assets and certain of its liabilities and (ii) an EndeavourRx subsidiary, into which we plan to contribute our neuromodulator platform, including both the AMPAkine and GABAkine programs and their related tangible and intangible assets and certain of their liabilities.

Management believes that AMPAKINE compounds hold promisethere are several advantages to separating these platforms formally into newly formed subsidiaries, including but not limited to optimizing their asset values through separate finance channels and making them more attractive for capital raising as well as for strategic deal making.

Employee/Consultant Infrastructure Build-out

In order to broaden our operational expertise, we are planning to hire a number of highly qualified individuals, either as employees or consultants and, in tandem, increase our administrative support function.

Our relationship with Drs. Cook and Witkin has been highly cooperative to date. Our intent is to contractually formalize these relationships as consultants to the Company.

Key contracts

The Purisys Agreement and the UIC License Agreement will need to be transferred or otherwise made available to the ResolutionRx subsidiary. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Manufacturing” and “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Technology Rights—University of Illinois License Agreement” for more information on these agreements. While this subsidiary’s initial, primary focus will be on repurposing dronabinol for the treatment of neurologicalOSA, we believe that our broad enabling patents and psychiatric diseasesa new proprietary formulation may provide a framework for expanding into the larger burgeoning pharmaceutical cannabinoid industry. We believe that by creating this subsidiary, it may be possible, through separate finance channels and disorders that are known, or thought,potential strategic transactions, to involve depressed functioningoptimize the asset value not only of pathwaysthe ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform, but our EndeavourRx neuromodulator platform as well.

Prospective Investors

We have had discussions with a number of potential cannabinoid investors and strategic partners who have expressed interest, mostly in the braindevelopment of a new, proprietary formulation with extended patent life. Forming a new subsidiary for our cannabinoid platform or our neuromodulator platform may allow us to attract financing from investors with a desire to invest in one platform but not the other.

Intellectual Property

The Company has exclusive rights to issued and pending patents claiming cannabinoid compositions and methods for treating cannabinoid-sensitive disorders, including sleep apnea, pain, glaucoma, muscular spasticity, anorexia and other conditions. In October 2019, we filed a continuation-in-part for our pending patent that describes and claims novel doses, controlled release compositions and methods of use glutamatefor cannabinoids, as well as a neurotransmitter. Our most advanced clinical compound is CX1739, which currently isnew U.S. provisional patent application further disclosing novel dosage and controlled release compositions and methods of use for cannabinoids, alone or in Phase II clinical development.combination, including with cannabinoid and non-cannabinoid molecules. Specific claims describe low dosage strengths and controlled release formulations for attaining a therapeutic window of cannabinoid blood levels that produce the desired therapeutic effects for a controlled period of time, while minimizing undesirable side effects. As previously disclosed, the original patents were filed by the Company and are now included in the UIC License Agreement. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Technology Rights—University of Illinois License Agreement” for more information on the UIC License Agreement. While no assurance can be provided that the claims in this continuation-in-part or the U.S. provisional patent application will be allowed in whole or in part, or that the patents will ultimately issue, we believe that these new filings, if allowed, will provide market protections through at least 2031.

We previously reported statisticallybelieve our intellectual property initiatives may afford expanding strategic options and clinically positive results with CX717market exclusivity in the burgeoning pharmaceutical cannabinoid business sector. New cannabinoid formulation technology is headed in the direction of enhanced absorption. These technologies, including nano- and micro-emulsions and thin films, have been shown to bypass the normal route of absorption and liver metabolism of cannabinoids, thus dramatically increasing blood levels and allowing for the use of low doses. Similarly, technologies may be used to achieve a controlled release of dronabinol, and we believe that our pending patent priority relating back to 2010 predates the efforts of others seeking to develop low-dose or extended release formulations of cannabinoids. Thus, to the extent that new technologies result in lower doses and/or controlled release formulations, we believe they would infringe on our pending patents once issued, not only for use in the treatment of adult patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, or ADHD. CX717 was included in the assets acquired by Biovail in March 2010.OSA but potentially a wide variety of other indications as well.

Our AMPAKINE compound CX1739 is substantially more potent than CX717 in animal studies. CX1739 has successfully completed human

Data from our Phase I2 clinical trials has allowed us to design new proprietary formulations of dronabinol, disclosed in our patent filings and more recently completed testing in a Phase II trial in the U.K.optimized for the treatment of not only OSA, but also other indications. Within the past 12 to 24 months, new formulation technology has emerged potentially allowing for the creation of a proprietary dronabinol formulation with optimized dose and duration of action for treating OSA. We have discussions in progress with a number of companies that have existing cannabinoid formulation technologies, expertise, and licensure capabilities, which may lead to the development of a proprietary formulation of dronabinol for the Company based on our pending patents for low-dose and extended release dronabinol and may lead to the development of a marketable proprietary formulation of dronabinol. We believe that the development of a novel, proprietary formulation of dronabinol would only extend time to market entry by approximately 12 months compared to the currently available generic soft gel capsules, but would dramatically extend market exclusivity; however, no assurance can be provided that any of the formulation technologies that we are currently analyzing will result in viable products or that formulation agreements will be consummated on terms acceptable to us. The failure to consummate a formulation agreement would materially and adversely affect the Company.

The Opportunity to Improve Dronabinol Formulations

Dronabinol is currently marketed as a soft gelatin capsule that suffers from several major deficiencies.

First, dronabinol exhibits poor and erratic absorption. Δ9-THC is not water soluble. The market dominant commercial gelcap dronabinol is currently formulated as a sesame oil-based liquid within a soft gelatin capsule. The absorption of dronabinol after oral administration is poor and highly variable with some patients achieving very high levels and others achieving very low levels. This erratic absorption may be responsible for the variable therapeutic responses observed in dronabinol clinical trials. Syndros®, on the other hand, is formulated as a solution in dehydrated alcohol, polyethylene glycol and other materials and exhibits its own challenges and deficiencies, including but not limited to it being Schedule II as compared to the capsule that is Schedule III.

Second, dronabinol is rapidly and extensively (approximately 80%) metabolized upon first pass through the liver, resulting in low blood levels. Additionally, dronabinol has a relatively short half-life (approximately 3 – 4 hours) and, in its present formulation, is not optimally suited for therapeutic indications requiring blood levels to be sustained for 6 hours or longer.

Third, in order to achieve sustained, therapeutic blood levels, we have found it necessary to use higher doses of dronabinol in our OSA clinical trials. For example, over an 8-hour period, the 2.5 mg and 10 mg doses produced therapeutically equivalent effects during the first 4 hours, but only the 10 mg dose produced therapeutic effects during the second 4 hours. Unfortunately, the 10 mg dose produces a higher occurrence of side effects than the 2.5 mg dose (as described in the Marinol® package insert). We anticipate focusing on new formulations that would achieve the blood levels produced by the lower doses for a sustained time period, resulting in the desired therapeutic effect(s) while minimizing undesirable side effects.

Large Commercial Opportunity

As a serious public health issue, the important need for diagnosing and ultimately treating OSA has recently been highlighted by the FDA clearance of several sleep apnea home test kits that are now third party reimbursed. Further highlighting this need, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE: CVS) announced the implementation of a program to diagnose and treat OSA initially within their own in-store, walk-in MinuteClinics. If implemented throughout their HealthHUB store network, the number of people diagnosed with sleep apnea and eligible for treatment should increase dramatically. Fitbit (NYSE: FIT), the health oriented smart watch company is seeking clearance from the FDA to diagnose sleep apnea. We believe that the combination of more efficient and patient friendly diagnostic procedures and, ultimately, pharmaceutical treatments such as those we are currently analyzing the results from the sleep apnea trial. Given the positive results previously demonstrated with CX717 in adults with ADHD, we plandeveloping will encourage more patients to initiate a Phase II study with CX1739 as a potential treatment for ADHD.

Although CX1739 was acquired by Biovail in our March 2010 transaction, certain rights to AMPAKINE compounds sold to Biovail were retained by us through a grant back license from Biovail. Specifically, Biovail’s rights to CX1739seek diagnosis and treatment. As noted above, there are limited to an intravenous dosage form to treat respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. Consequently, following the transaction we retained our exclusive rights to pursue the development of CX1739 in a non-intravenous dosage form and certain of the other subject AMPAKINE compounds for indications other than the treatment of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease.

The structure of the transaction with Biovail permits us to pursue the development of CX1739 and certain other of the acquired AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders, ADHD and other indications. Additionally, we retained all composition of matter patent rights for the compounds in the 2007 and 2076 patent series.

Additional drug candidates are being readied for further development, including AMPAKINE compounds CX2007 and CX2076. These compounds exhibit a significantly increased metabolic half-life in animals, which may ultimately result in a once-a-day treatment potential in humans. This further development will be dependent upon obtaining additional financial resources to conduct such studies.

We have filed several new patents for our AMPAKINE compounds that, if granted, will provide patent protection for our new compounds up to 2028.

The AMPAKINE platform addresses large potential markets. Our business plan involves partnering with larger pharmaceutical companies for research, development, clinical testing, manufacturing and global marketing of AMPAKINE compounds for those indications that require sizable, expensive Phase III clinical trials and very large sales forces to achieve significant market penetration.

At the same time, subject to availability of sufficient resources, we plan to develop compounds internally for a selected set of indications, many of which will allow us to apply for orphan drug status. Such designation by the Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, is usually applied to products where the number ofapproximately 29 million OSA patients in the United States and an additional 26 million in the given disease category is typically less than 200,000. These orphan drug indications typically require more modest investment in the development stages, follow a quicker regulatory path to approval,Germany and involve a more concentrated and smaller sales force targeted at selected medical centers and a limited number of medical specialists8 million in the United StatesKingdom. There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of OSA.

As noted below in “—Proposed Regulatory Process,” there are several ways to achieve market exclusivity with respect to this large and Europe.

underserved patient population.

Proposed Regulatory Process

In conjunction with its management and consultants, the Company intends to file a new NDA under Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (as amended, the “FDCA” and such NDA a “505(b)(2) NDA”), claiming the efficacy and safety of our licensing discussions, we seekproposed proprietary dronabinol formulation in the treatment of OSA. We believe the use of dronabinol for the treatment of OSA is a novel indication for an already approved drug, making it eligible for a 505(b)(2) NDA, as opposed to reserve rights that may be viewedthe submission and approval of a full 505(b)(1) NDA.

The 505(b)(2) NDA was created by the Hatch-Waxman Act, as amended (the “Hatch-Waxman Act”), which amended the FDCA to help avoid unnecessary duplication of studies already performed on a natural expansion beyondpreviously approved drug. As amended, the FDCA gives the FDA express permission to rely on data not developed by the NDA applicant. Accordingly, a 505(b)(2) NDA contains full safety and effectiveness reports but allows at least some of the orphan drug usesinformation required for NDA approval, such as safety and efficacy information on the active ingredient, to selected larger areascome from studies not conducted by or for the applicant. This can result in a less expensive and faster route to approval, compared with a traditional development path, such as 505(b)(1), while still allowing for the creation of therapynew, differentiated products. The 505(b)(2) NDA regulatory path offers the applicant market protections, such as market exclusivity, under the Hatch-Waxman Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. Other, international regulatory routes are available to thereby allow uspursue proprietary formulations of dronabinol and would provide further market protections. For example, in Europe, a regulatory approval route similar to potentially further develop our compounds for such larger non-orphan drug indications.the 505(b)(2) pathway is the hybrid procedure based on Article 10 of Directive 2001/83/EC.

We have worked with regulatory consultants who will assist with FDA filings and regulatory strategy. If we are successfulcan secure sufficient financing, of which no assurance can be provided, we anticipate requesting a pre-IND meeting with the FDA. This meeting also could create the type of dialogue with the FDA that is normally communicated at an end-of Phase 2 meeting. The FDA responses to this meeting will be incorporated into an IND.

If we can secure sufficient financing, of which no assurance can be provided, we plan to propose conducting the appropriate clinical studies with our proprietary controlled release formulation in OSA patients to determine safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy, as well as a standard Phase 1 clinical study to determine potential abuse liability. When a Phase 3 study is required for a 505(b)(2), usually only one study with fewer patients is necessary versus the pursuittwo, large scale, confirmatory studies generally required for the standard 505(b)(1) NDA. While no assurance can be provided, with an extensive safety database tracking chronic, long-term use of this operating strategy, we may be in a position to contain our costs over the next few years, to maintain our focus on the researchMarinol® and early development of novel pharmaceuticals (wheregenerics, we believe that wethe FDA should not have the ability to compete) and eventually to participate more fullymajor safety concerns with dronabinol in the commercial developmenttreatment of AMPAKINE productsOSA.

The Company has worked with the investigators who conducted the Phase 2B clinical trial, as well as with our Clinical Advisory Panel to design a draft Phase 3 protocol that, based on the experience and results from the Phase 2A and Phase 2B trials, we believe will provide sufficient data for FDA approval of a RespireRx dronabinol controlled release formulation for OSA. The current version of the protocol is designed as a 90-day randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study of dronabinol in the United States.treatment of OSA. Depending on feedback from the FDA, the Company estimates that the Phase 3 trial would require between 120 and 300 patients at 15 to 20 sites, and take 18 to 24 months to complete, at a cost of between $10 million and $14 million.

Critical Accounting Policies

We believe our rights under the Purisys Agreement would help facilitate regulatory approval. Under the Purisys Agreement, Purisys has agreed to (i) provide all of the API estimated to be needed for the clinical development process for first- and Management Estimates

The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in management’s view, most importantsecond-generation products, three validation batches for NDA filings and adequate supply for the initial inventory stocking for the wholesale and retail channels, subject to certain limitations, (ii) maintain or file valid DMFs with the FDA or any other regulatory authority and provide the Company with access or a right of reference letter entitling the Company to make continuing reference to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and most demanding of our judgment. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted inDMFs during the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities.

We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. This process forms the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when all four of the following criteria are met: (i) pervasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii) the fees earned can be readily determined; and (iv) collectibility of the fees is reasonably assured.

Amounts received for upfront technology license fees under multiple-element arrangements are deferred and recognized over the period of committed services or performance, if such arrangements require our on-going services or performance.

Revenues from milestone payments are recognized when earned, as evidenced by written acknowledgement from the collaborator, provided that (i) the milestone event is substantive and its achievement was not reasonably assured at the inceptionterm of the agreement and (ii)in connection with any regulatory filings made with the Company’s performance obligations, if any, after the milestone achievement will continue to be fundedFDA by the collaborator atCompany, (iii) participate on a comparable level to that beforedevelopment committee, and (iv) make available its regulatory consultants, collaborate with any regulatory consulting firms engaged by the milestone was achieved. If both of these criteria are not met, the milestone payment would be recognized over the remaining minimum period of the Company’s performance obligations under the arrangement.

We record grant revenuesCompany and participate in all FDA or DEA meetings as the expensesappropriate and as related to the grant projects are incurred. Amounts received under research grants are nonrefundable, regardless ofAPI.

In consideration for these supplies and services, the Company has agreed to (i) purchase exclusively from Purisys, during the commercialization phase, all API for these products at a pre-determined price subject to certain producer price adjustments and (ii) allow Purisys’s participation in the economic success of the underlying research,commercialized products up to the extent that such amounts are expended in accordanceearlier of the achievement of a maximum dollar amount or the expiration of a period of time. See “Information with the approved grant project.

Employee Stock Options and Stock-Based Compensation

We measureRespect to our share-based compensation cost at the grant date basedCompany—Description of Business—Manufacturing” for information on the estimated value of the award and recognize it as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment in estimating the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.

As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $233,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements. These non-cash costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.

Stock options and warrants issued to our consultants and other non-employees as compensation for services to be provided to us are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. We recognize this expense over the period the services are provided.

Convertible Debt and Equity InstrumentsPurisys Agreement.

We review the features of our issued financing instruments to determine whether such instruments are appropriately measured and classified as either debt or equity in our financial statements. Generally, instruments that include a provision that may require settlement in cash are recorded as a liability.

The conversion features within our issued convertible instruments are valued separately from the preferred stock or debt securities. We allocate the proceeds received from a financing transaction that includes a convertible instrument to the convertible preferred stock or debt and any detachable instruments, such as warrants, on a relative fair value basis.

The value allocated to the convertible instrument is used to estimate an effective conversion price for the convertible preferred stock or debt, and to measure the intrinsic value, if any, of the conversion feature on the date that we issue the securities.

The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with no need for our judgment in their application. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Results of Operations

The Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discussed herein are presented below.

  Six-months ended  Year ended 
  June 30,  

December 31,

 
  2020  2019  2019  2018 
Operating expenses:                
General and administrative $829,019  $594,904  $1,137,175  $1,488,238 
Research and development  308,466   297,350   599,329   688,286 
Total operating expenses  1,137,485   892,254   

1,736,504

   2,176,524 
Loss from operations  (1,137,485)  (892,254)  (1,736,504)  (2,176,524)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other liabilities in exchange for equity  (323,996)  -   -  (166,382)
Interest expense  (331,316)  (151,645)  (404,661)  (136,243)
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)  29,942  26,354   26,132   (112,641)
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(1,762,855) $(1,017,545) $(2,115,033) $(2,591,790)
                 
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.04) $(0.26) $(0.54) $(0.77)
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  49,320,761   3,872,076   3,908,479   3,351,105 

GeneralSix-months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

In January 1999, we entered into a research collaborationRevenues. The Company had no revenues during the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and exclusive worldwide license agreement with NV Organon, or Organon,2019.

General and Administrative. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, general and administrative expenses were $829,019, an increase of $234,115, as compared to enable Organon to develop and commercialize our AMPAKINE technology$594,904 for the treatmentsix-months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the six-months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to an increase in general and administrative salaries of schizophrenia and depression. In connection$49,525 with the agreement, we received payments approximating $14,000,000, includingaddition of compensation and benefits for our new Chief Executive Officer and President effective May 6, 2020, an up-front payment, research support and milestone payments. In November 2007, Organon was acquired by Schering-Plough Corporation. Subsequently, in November 2009, Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp., or Merck, acquired Schering-Plough Corporation. Following the merger with Schering-Plough, in September 2010 Merck notified us that it would not be proceeding furtherincrease general legal fees of $154,326, primarily related to legal fees associated with the AMPAKINE technology.

As a result, rights toApril 2020 and June 2020 convertible note financings, the use of AMPAKINE compounds forincrease in the treatment of schizophrenia and depression were returned to us. Merck retains ownership of compounds developed by Organon or developed jointly by Organon and us during the collaboration, but no longer has rights to use our patents or know-how. We are free to pursue strategic opportunities for allnumber of our other AMPAKINE compounds in schizophreniaauthorized shares that required the filing of a Form DEF 14C with the Securities and depression.

In October 2000, we entered into a research collaboration agreementExchange Commission and a license agreementfiling with Les Laboratoires Servier, or Servier. The agreements will allow Servier to developthe State of Delaware, and commercialize select AMPAKINE compounds in defined territories of Europe, Asia the Middle East and certain South American countries as a treatment for (i) declines in cognitive performance associated with aging, (ii) neurodegenerative diseases and (iii) anxiety disorders. The indications covered include, but are not limited to, Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, sexual dysfunction and the dementia associated with multiple sclerosis and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. The research collaboration agreement, as amended, included an up-front payment by Servier of $5,000,000 and research support payments of approximately $2,025,000 per year through early December 2006 (subject to us providing agreed-upon levels of research personnel). In early December 2006, we terminated the research collaboration with Servier and as a result the worldwide rights for the AMPAKINE technology for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases were returned to us, other than three compounds selected by Servier for commercialization in its territory. In November 2010, Servier selected a jointly discovered AMPAKINE compound to advance into Phase I clinical testing. Should the compound be successfully commercialized by Servier, the Company would receive payments based upon key clinical development milestones and royalty payments on sales in licensed territories.

In March 2010, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Biovail. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, Biovail acquired our interests in CX717, CX1763, CX1942 and the injectable dosage form of CX1739,general matters as well as certainan increase in patent legal fees of our other AMPAKINE compounds and related intellectual property for use in the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. In connection with the transaction, Biovail paid us a lump sum of $9,000,000 upon execution of the asset purchase agreement$13,659 and an additional $1,000,000 upon completionincrease in directors and officers liability insurance and other insurance costs of $10,162, offset by the specified transfer plannet effect of increases and decreases in September 2010. In addition, we will have the right to receive up to three milestone paymentsother general and administrative expenses. There was no stock-based compensation in an aggregate amount of up to $15,000,000 plus the reimbursement of certain relatedgeneral and administrative expenses each conditioned upon the occurrence of particular events relating to the clinical development of certain assets that Biovail acquired.

As part of the transaction, Biovail licensed back to us certain exclusive and irrevocable rights to some acquired AMPAKINE compounds, other than CX717, an injectable dosage form of CX1739, CX1763 and CX1942, for use outside of the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. Accordingly, following the transaction with Biovail, we retain rights for the majoritysix-months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.

Research and Development. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, research and development expenses were $308,466, an increase of patented compounds in our AMPAKINE drug library,$11,116, as well as all rightscompared to the non-acquired AMPAKINE compounds$297,350 for the treatment of neurological diseases and psychiatric disorders that have historically been a focus of our portfolio. Additionally, we retain our rights to develop and commercialize AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders, including an oral dosage form of CX1739.

In September 2010, Biovail merged with Valeant. As a result of Valeant’s merger and changessix-months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in strategic directions for the combined company, Valeant announced its intent to exit several therapeutic development programs, including the respiratory depression project acquired from the Company. The Company is in discussions with Valeant regarding the future of the project and under the agreement between the Company and Biovail, all contractual obligations remain in place.

From inception (February 10, 1987) through the quarter ended on September 30, 2010, we have sustained losses aggregating approximately $113,151,000. Continuing losses are anticipated over the next several years. During that time, our ongoing operating expenses will only be offset, if at all, by proceeds from governmental and other grants and by possible milestone payments from Servier and Biovail. Ongoing operating expenses may also be funded by payments under planned strategic alliances that we are seeking with other pharmaceutical companies for the clinical development, manufacturing and marketing of our products. The nature and timing of payments to us under the Servier and Biovail agreements or other planned strategic alliances, if and when entered into, are likely to significantly affect our operations and financing activities and to produce substantial period-to-period fluctuations in reported financial results. Over the longer term, we will be dependent upon the successful introduction of a new product into the North American market from our internal development, as well as the successful commercial development of our products by Servier or our other prospective partners to attain profitable operations from royalties or other product-based revenues.

Comparison of the Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

For the three months ended September 30, 2010, our net loss applicable to common stock of approximately $528,000 compares with a net loss applicable to common stock of approximately $3,243,000 for the corresponding prior year period, a decrease of approximately 84%.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our net income applicable to common stock of approximately $2,613,000 compares with a net loss applicable to common stock of approximately $9,189,000 for the corresponding prior year period.

Revenues for the current year periods include amounts related to our March 2010 transaction with Biovail. As detailed above, we received $10,000,000 in connection with the transaction, including $9,000,000 upon execution of the asset purchase agreement and an additional $1,000,000 upon completion of the specified transfer plan in September 2010.

Revenues for the current year periods also include amounts awarded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research in July 2010. The related grant will provide funding to test select AMPAKINE compounds for their ability to restore brain function in animal models of Parkinson’s disease.

Our research and development expenses for the three-month periodsix-months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010 decreased from approximately $846,0002020, as compared to approximately $777,000, or by 8%, from the corresponding prior year period duesix-months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily a result of an adjustment to a decreaseone research contract, an increase in non-cash stockresearch and development related insurance and the payment of option fee associated with the option agreement related to the UWMRF Patent License Agreement. There was no stock-based compensation charges, as explained more fully below.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, ourin research and development expenses decreased from approximately $4,009,000for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.

Interest Expense. During the six-months ended June 30, 2020, interest expense was $331,316 as compared to approximately $3,347,000, or by 17%,$151,645 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The increase of $179,671 is primarily the result of interest and amortization of note discounts to interest expense with respect to the convertible notes arising in August, October and November 2019 that were included sublicense payments approximating $940,000 related to our transaction with Biovail. Excluding such sublicense payments, our research and development expenses decreased significantly relative toin the current year three-month period but did not exist in the prior year period duecomparable three-month period.

Foreign Currency Transaction (Loss) Gain. Foreign currency transaction gain was $29,942 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to a foreign currency transaction gain of $26,354 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The foreign currency transaction (loss) gain relates to the reduction$399,774 loan from SY Corporation made in force that we implementedJune 2012, which is denominated in mid-March 2009the South Korean Won.

Loss on Extinguishment of Convertible Debt. The loss on extinguishment of convertible debt during the six-months ended June 30, 2020 was $323,996 as compared to $0 in the six-months ended June 30, 2019. On March 21, 2020, the Company entered into exchange agreements with several note holders and as a resultexchanged an aggregate of decreased clinical development expenses.$255,786 of principal and accrued interest for 17,052,424 shares of the Company’s stock with an exchange price of $0.015 per share which was less than the closing price of $0.034 per share. There was no loss on extinguishment of convertible debt during the six-months ended June 30, 2019.

Our expensesNet Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, the Company incurred a net loss of $816,137 as compared to a net loss of $477,213 for the prior year period included amounts for Phase I clinical testing of AMPAKINE CX1739, as well as initiation of a Phase IIa proof of concept study with the compound in sleep apnea. We recently completed testing with the compoundsix-months ended June 30, 2019. Included in the sleep apnea studynet loss is a loss on extinguishment of convertible debt of $323,996.

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and are analyzingsatisfaction of liabilities in the related data. Total external preclinical and clinical development expenses for CX1739 totaled approximately $258,000 and $964,000normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $1,762,855 for the nine monthssix-months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102020 and 2009, respectively.

Our AMPAKINE CX717 was included in our transaction that we completed with Biovail in March 2010. External preclinical and clinical development costs$2,115,033 for CX717 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 totaled approximately $100,000 and $105,000, respectively, with amounts for the 2010 period reflecting costs triggered by our transaction with Biovail. External preclinical expenses to date through September 30, 2010 for CX717 and CX1739 amounted to approximately $16,000,000 and $3,000,000, respectively.

Other external preclinical expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 for less advanced AMPAKINE compounds totaled approximately $30,000 and $15,000, respectively. In total, our external clinical and preclinical expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 approximated $388,000 and $1,084,000, respectively.

Amounts incurred for all internal research and development costs, including personnel costs and indirect amounts allocated to research and development, as well as costs for retaining outside experts for consulting and research activities are deemed to benefit the entire AMPAKINE platform and are not separately evaluated by compound. Such costs, excluding amounts for non-cash stock compensation charges, totaled approximately $2,901,000 and $2,703,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Of these totals, as mentioned above, amounts for the 2010 period include $940,000 of sublicense fees related to our transaction with Biovail. Other costs related to the access and protection of our AMPAKINE technology totaled approximately $479,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, which amounts were materially consistent with those for the corresponding prior year period. Expenses for personnel, outside experts and consultants approximated $1,100,000 and $1,670,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, costs for laboratory facility and supply expenses were approximately $382,000 and $557,000, respectively.

At this time, we are just beginning the clinical development of CX1739 and developing other preclinical backup candidates. As the clinical development of CX1739 expands, our research and development costs are anticipated to increase significantly.

Our non-cash stock compensation charges related to research and development decreased from approximately $84,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to a credit of approximately $5,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the non-cash stock compensation charges for research and development decreased from approximately $222,000 to approximately $58,000, or by 74%, compared with the corresponding prior year period, reflecting fluctuations in our stock price, the vesting schedules of earlier granted stock options and a decrease in options granted relative to the corresponding prior year period.

Our general and administrative expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 increased from approximately $883,000 to approximately $947,000, or by 7%, compared to the corresponding prior year period, due primarily to an increased use of advisory consultants to assist us in identifying strategic opportunities for the Company. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our general and administrative expenses increased from approximately $2,851,000 to approximately $3,677,000, or by 29% compared to the corresponding prior year period, mostly reflecting legal and investment banking fees related to the March 2010 transaction that we completed with Biovail, along with fees for the increased use of advisory consultants mentioned above.

For the three months ended September 30, 2010, our non-cash stock compensation charges within general and administrative expenses decreased from approximately $116,000 to approximately $62,000, or by 47%, relative to the corresponding prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, these charges decreased from approximately $234,000 to approximately $208,000, or by 11%, relative to the corresponding prior year period, primarily due to the vesting schedules of earlier granted options.

Our net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 of approximately $3,000 compares with net interest income of approximately $1,000 for the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net interest expense of approximately $555,000 compares with net interest income of approximately $18,000 for the corresponding prior year period.

Net interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 includes interest on our convertible promissory note that we issued to Samyang Optics Co., Ltd., or Samyang, in January 2010, and charges for the amortization of capitalized offering costs and the beneficial conversion feature recorded in connection with the transaction.

Accelerated amortization charges for the offering costs and the beneficial conversion feature were recorded upon Samyang’s conversion of the promissory note in June 2010, along with non-cash charges for the allocated value of warrants issued to Samyang upon the note’s conversion. See Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Financial Statements, dated September 30, 2010.

The net losses applicable to common stock for the 2009 periods included charges of approximately $832,000 related to the beneficial conversion feature of our 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock that we issued in April 2009 and $1,515,000 related to the beneficial conversion feature of our Series F Convertible Preferred Stock that we issued in July 2009. These non-cash charges relate to the accounting requirements for the difference between the fair value of our common stock and the conversion price of the preferred stock on the date the preferred stock was issued.

Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, our net loss applicable to common stock decreased by 26% to approximately $10,788,000 compared to a net loss applicable to common stock2019 respectively, as well as negative operating cash flows of approximately $14,596,000$106,448 for the prior year. Consistent withsix-months ended June 30, 2020 and $487,745 for the priorfiscal year weended December 31, 2019. The Company also had no revenuesa stockholders’ deficiency of $7,846,748 at June 30, 2020 and expects to continue to incur net losses and negative operating cash flows for at least the next few years. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its audit report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.2019, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The net loss applicableCompany is currently, and has for some time, been in significant financial distress. It has extremely limited cash resources and current assets and has no ongoing source of sustainable revenue. Management is continuing to common stockaddress various aspects of the Company’s operations and obligations, including, without limitation, debt obligations, financing requirements, establishment of new and maintenance and improvement of existing and in-process intellectual property, licensing agreements, legal and patent matters and regulatory compliance, and has taken steps to continue to raise new debt and equity capital to fund the Company’s business activities from both related and unrelated parties to fund the Company’s business activities.

The Company is continuing its efforts to raise additional capital in order to be able to pay its liabilities and fund its business activities on a going forward basis, including the pursuit of the Company’s planned research and development activities. The Company regularly evaluates various measures to satisfy the Company’s liquidity needs, including development and other agreements with collaborative partners and, when necessary, seeking to exchange or restructure the Company’s outstanding securities. The Company is evaluating certain changes to its operations and structure to facilitate raising capital from sources that may be interested in financing only discrete aspects of the Company’s development programs. Such changes could include a significant reorganization, which may include the formation of one or more subsidiaries into which one or more of our programs may be contributed. As a result of the Company’s current financial situation, the Company has limited access to external sources of debt and equity financing. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to secure additional financing in the amounts necessary to fully fund its operating and debt service requirements. If the Company is unable to access sufficient cash resources, the Company may be forced to discontinue its operations entirely and liquidate.

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

Revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had no revenues.

General and Administrative. For the year ended December 31, 2019, general and administrative expenses were $1,137,175, a decrease of $351,063, as compared to $1,488,238 for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes charges of approximately $2,347,000 related to the beneficial conversion feature of our 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock2018.

Stock-based compensation costs and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock that we issuedfees included in April 2009general and July 2009, respectively. These non-cash charges relate to the accounting requirementsadministrative expenses were $0 for the difference between the fair value of our common stock and the effective conversion price of the preferred stock on the date of issuance of the preferred stock. Excluding these non-cash charges, the decrease in net loss applicableDecember 31, 2019, as compared to common stock$14,248 for the year ended December 31, 2009 reflects decreased research2018, reflecting a decrease of $14,248. The decrease is the result of the fact that no stock-based compensation was granted to general and developmentadministrative employees of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2019. Salaries and employee benefits included in general and administrative expenses as explained more fully below.

Our research and development expenseswere $439,807 for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased from approximately $10,780,0002019 as compared to approximately $4,598,000, or by 57% from the prior year. The most significant decrease reflects external expenses during the prior year for clinical studies with AMPAKINE CX717 as a treatment for respiratory depression and preclinical development expenses for our AMPAKINE CX1739, which is now in human clinical testing. More specifically, the development of CX717 was slowed because of some potential preclinical toxicology effects that might limit its clinical applications to very short-term uses in humans. At the same time, we started development of a new compound with longer patent life, CX1739.

The total external preclinical and clinical development expenses for CX717$685,884 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20092018, a decrease of $246,077. The decrease is primarily due to the full year elimination of the salary and 2008 were approximately $106,000employee benefits of the former Chief Executive Officer and $1,473,000, respectively, with amounts for 2008 reflectingPresident in the substantial clinical work still underway at that time. For CX1739, total external preclinical and clinical development expenses totaled approximately $1,021,000 and $2,061,000 during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Other external preclinical2019 as compared to the elimination of only one quarter of a year of such expenses forin the yearsyear ended December 31, 2009 and 20082018. Legal fees for less advanced AMPAKINE compounds totaled approximately $16,000 and $337,000, respectively. In total, our external clinical and preclinical expensesgeneral corporate purposes were $213,289 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximated $1,143,000 and $3,871,000, respectively.

Amounts incurred for all internal research and development costs, including personnel costs and indirect amounts allocated2019 as compared to research and development, as well as costs for retaining outside experts for consulting and research activities are deemed to benefit the entire AMPAKINE platform and are not separately evaluated by compound. Such costs, excluding amounts for non-cash stock compensation charges, totaled approximately $3,229,000 and $6,187,000$278,373 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20092018, a decrease of $65,084. Legal fees for patents and 2008, respectively.

Of these totals, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,other patent expenses for personnel, outside experts and consultants approximated $1,956,000 and $4,331,000, respectively. Salary and related expenses for our research and development personnel decreased relative to the prior year due to expenses for our President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Mark Varney. Before his appointment to President and Chief Executive Officer in August 2008, Dr. Varney served as our Chief Scientific Officer and Chief Operating Officer and his salary-related expenses were included in research and development. After his appointment in August 2008, Dr. Varney’s salary related expenses have been recorded in general and administrative expenses. Salaryexpenses were $147,722 for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $51,641 as compared to $199,363 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decreases in both general legal fees and related expenses for our researchlegal fees associated with patents and development personnel further decreased asother patent costs is a result of oura reduction in force that we implementedutilization of professional resources as part of the Company’s cost control efforts, partially offset by patent legal fees associated with patent filings made in mid-March 2009.October 2019.

The remaining $25,987 of increases in general and administrative expenses is due to a number of increases partially offset by decreases in a number of other expense categories.

Indirect costs allocated to researchResearch and development include laboratory facility and supply expenses, along with amounts related to the access and protection of our AMPAKINE technology. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, laboratory facility and supply expenses totaled approximately $684,000 and $1,272,000, respectively.Development. For the year ended December 31, 2009, costs related to the access and protection of our AMPAKINE technology approximated $589,000 and were materially unchanged from such expenses for the prior year period.

The difference in unallocated costs between 2009 and 2008 reflects the reduction in the clinical development of CX717 and the start-up of the new compound, CX1739, as well as early work on preclinical development of other potential drug candidates. Early preclinical development costs are usually much lower than when a compound is moved into clinical development, where costs to conduct human trials are substantially greater. At this time, we are just beginning the clinical development of CX1739 and developing other preclinical back candidates. As the clinical development of CX1739 expands, our2019, research and development costs are anticipatedexpenses were $599,329, a decrease of $88,957, as compared to increase significantly.

Our non-cash stock compensation charges related to research and development$688,286 for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased from approximately $722,0002018, primarily due to approximately $226,000,a decrease in the utilization of consultants and a decrease in research contract expenses.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt and other Liabilities in Exchange for Equity. There was no loss on extinguishment of debt or by 69% compared to the prior year, as a result of fluctuations in our stock price and the vesting schedules of granted stock options.

Our general and administrative expensesother liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased from approximately $4,259,0002019 as compared to approximately $3,737,000, or by 12%, relative to the prior year. The decrease in expenses primarily reflects decreased non-cash stock-based compensation charges, savings from earlier implemented salary reductions for our executive officers and prior year consulting fees for market research in the fielda loss of respiratory depression.

Our non-cash stock compensation charges related to general and administration$166,382 for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased from approximately $577,0002018.

Interest Expense. During the year ended December 31, 2019, interest expense was $404,661 (including $60,135 to approximately $347,000, or by 40%related parties of which $49,863 is to a single vendor that is also a related party representing interest on invoices subject to delayed payment), relativean increase of $268,418, as compared to the prior year, as a result of fluctuations in our stock price.

Net interest income$136,243 (including $42,821 to related parties) for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased to approximately $17,0002018. The increase in interest expense resulted primarily from approximately $443,000, or by 96%, comparedinterest on five new convertible notes issued from January through March 2019 totaling $110,000 of principal amount in 2019, and five additional new convertible notes issued in April, May, August, October and November 2019 totaling $393,500 of principal and additional interest with respect to the prior year dueSalamandra legal settlement as well as from a single vendor associated with the delay of cash remittances to a decrease in cash available for investing activity.that vendor.

Comparison ofForeign Currency Transaction Loss or Gain. The foreign currency transaction gain was $26,132 for the Years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, our2019, as compared to a foreign currency transaction loss of $112,641 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The foreign currency transaction loss or gain relates to the $399,774 loan from SY Corporation Co., Ltd., formerly known as Samyang Optics Co. Ltd. (“SY Corporation”), made in June 2012, which is denominated in the South Korean Won.

Net Loss. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred a net loss increased by 13% to approximately $14,596,000of $2,115,033, as compared to a net loss of approximately $12,969,000 for the prior year. Consistent with the prior year, we had no revenues$2,591,790 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Our research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased from approximately $9,327,000 to approximately $10,780,000, or by 16% from the prior year. Most of the increase represented clinical development expenses for our two Phase IIa trials of AMPAKINE CX717 as a treatment for respiratory depression and the initiation of clinical development of AMPAKINE CX1739. Total clinical development expenses for CX717 approximated $1,201,000 and $102,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the same periods, preclinical development expenses for CX717 totaled approximately $272,000 and $415,000, respectively.2018.

Early preclinical and clinical development for CX1739 totaled approximately $2,061,000 and $118,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Other external preclinical expenses for less advanced AMPAKINE compounds totaled approximately $337,000 and $1,368,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

In total, our external clinical and preclinical expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 approximated $3,871,000 and $2,003,000, respectively.

Amounts incurred for all internal research and development costs, including personnel costs and indirect amounts allocated to research and development, as well as costs for retaining outside experts for consulting and research activities are deemed to benefit the entire AMPAKINE platform and are not separately evaluated by compound. Such costs, excluding amounts for non-cash stock compensation charges, totaled approximately $6,187,000 and $5,953,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Of these totals, for the year ended December 31, 2008 expenses for personnel, outside experts and consultants approximated $4,331,000, and were materially unchanged from such expenses for the prior year period. Indirect costs allocated to research and development include laboratory facility and supply expenses, along with amounts related to the access and protection of our AMPAKINE technology. Costs for laboratory facilities and supply expenses totaled approximately $1,272,000 and $1,152,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Expenses related to the access and protection of our AMPAKINE technology amounted to approximately $584,000 and $514,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Our non-cash stock compensation charges related to research and development for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased from approximately $1,371,000 to approximately $722,000, or by 47%, relative to the prior year, which partially offset our increased clinical development expenses. The decreased non-cash stock compensation charges resulted from fluctuations in our stock price and the vesting schedules of granted stock options.

Our general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased slightly from approximately $4,320,000 to approximately $4,259,000, or by 1%, compared to the prior year. Our non-cash stock compensation charges produced most of this decrease. Our related charges decreased from approximately $866,000 in the year ended December 31, 2007 to approximately $577,000 in 2008. Increased personnel-related expenses partially offset the decrease and resulted from the appointment of our new President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Mark Varney, in mid-August 2008. Dr. Varney’s salary and related expenses were previously included in research and development expenses while he served as our former Chief Scientific Officer and Chief Operating Officer.

Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased to approximately $443,000 from approximately $678,000, or by 35%, relative to the prior year, due to a decrease in cash available for investing.

Liquidity and Capital ResourcesLegal Proceedings

Sources

By letter dated February 5, 2016, the Company received a demand from a law firm representing Salamandra, LLC (“Salamandra”) alleging $146,082 due and Usesowing for unpaid services rendered. On January 18, 2017, following an arbitration proceeding in the Superior Court of CashNew Jersey, an arbitrator awarded Salamandra the full amount sought. Additionally, the arbitrator granted Salamandra’s attorneys’ fees and costs of $47,937. All such amounts have been accrued at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, including accrued interest at 4.5% annually from February 26, 2018, the date of the judgment, through June 30, 2020, totaling $20,736.

Pursuant

On December 16, 2019, the Company and Salamandra entered into an amendment to the terms of our transaction with Biovail in March 2010, Biovail paid us $10,000,000, including $1,000,000 received duringsettlement agreement and release, executed August 21, 2019 (the “Original Settlement Agreement” and as amended, the quarter ended September 30, 2010. In addition, we have“Amended Settlement Agreement”) regarding $202,395 owed by the rightCompany to receive upSalamandra (as reduced by any further payments by the Company to three milestone payments in an aggregate amount of up to $15,000,000 plusSalamandra, the reimbursement of certain related expenses, all of which are conditioned upon the occurrence of particular events relating to the clinical development of those certain assets that were transferred to Biovail“Full Amount”) in connection with the transaction.

arbitration award previously granted in favor of Salamandra. Under the agreements signed with Servier in October 2000, as amended to date, in November 2010 Servier selected the jointly discovered high impact AMPAKINE compound, S47445, to advance into Phase I clinical trials. We remain eligible to receive payments based upon defined clinical development milestonesterms of the licensed compoundOriginal Settlement Agreement, the Company was to pay Salamandra $125,000 on or before November 30, 2019 in full satisfaction of the Full Amount owed, subject to conditions regarding the Company’s ability to raise certain dollar amounts of working capital. Under the Amended Settlement Agreement, (i) the Company was to pay and royaltiesthe Company paid to Salamandra $25,000 on salesor before December 21, 2019, (ii) upon such payment, Salamandra ceased all collection efforts against the Company until March 31, 2020 (the “Threshold Date”), and (iii) the Company was to pay to Salamandra $100,000 on or before the Threshold Date if the Company had at that time raised $600,000 in licensed territories.working capital. Such payments by the Company would have constituted satisfaction of the Full Amount owed and would have served as consideration for the dismissal of the action underlying the arbitration award and the mutual releases set forth in the Amended Settlement Agreement. If the Company had raised less than $600,000 in working capital before the Threshold Date, the Company was to pay to Salamandra an amount equal to 21% of the working capital amount raised, in which case such payment would have reduced the Full Amount owed on a dollar-for-dollar basis, and Salamandra would then have been able to seek collection on the remainder of the debt. The Company made the initial payment of $25,000 in December 2019, but did not make the subsequent required payment on March 31, 2020, nor has any payment been made during the three-months ended June 30, 2020. The Company has initiated further discussions with the intent of reaching a revised settlement agreement which cannot be assured.

By email dated July 21, 2016, the Company received a demand from an investment banking consulting firm that represented the Company in 2012 in conjunction with the Pier transaction alleging that $225,000 is due and payable for investment banking services rendered. Such amount has been included in accrued expenses at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

On February 21, 2020, Sharp Clinical Services, Inc. ("Sharp"), a vendor of the Company, filed a complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Bergen County related to a December 16, 2019 demand for payment of past due invoices inclusive of late fees totaling $103,890 of which $3,631 relates to late fees, seeking $100,259 plus 1.5% interest per month on outstanding unpaid invoices. Amid settlement discussions, the vendor stated on March 13, 2020 its intent to proceed to a default judgment against the Company, and the Company stated on March 14, 2020 its intent to continue settlement discussions. On May 29, 2020, a default was entered against the Company, and on September 4, 2020, a final judgment by default was entered against the Company in the amount of $104,217.37.

The Company is periodically the subject of various pending and threatened legal actions and claims. In the opinion of management of the Company, adequate provision has been made in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 with respect to such matters, including, specifically, the matters noted above. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself if any of the matters described above results in the filing of a lawsuit or formal claim.

43

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The mission of the Company is to develop innovative and revolutionary treatments to combat diseases caused by disruption of neuronal signaling. We also may receiveare developing treatment options that address conditions affecting millions of people, but for which there are few or poor treatment options, including OSA, ADHD, epilepsy, chronic pain and recovery from SCI. The Company is developing a pipeline of new drug product candidates based on our broad patent portfolios for two drug platforms: (i) pharmaceutical cannabinoids, which include dronabinol, a synthetic form of THC that acts upon the nervous system’s endogenous cannabinoid receptors and (ii) neuromodulators, which include ampakines and GABAkines, proprietary compounds that, as PAMs, positively modulate AMPA-type glutamate receptors and GABAAreceptors, respectively. Due to insufficient funding, we do not currently have any active clinical trials and only limited operations.

Product Development Plans

In order to facilitate our business activities and product development, we are organizing our drug platforms into two separate business units. The business unit focused on pharmaceutical cannabinoids is named ResolutionRx and the business unit focused on neuromodulators is named EndeavourRx. It is anticipated that the Company will use, at least initially, its management personnel to provide management, operational and oversight services to these two business units. Below is a description of the Company’s product development plans within these business units. Please see the section titled “The Business of the Company” in this prospectus for background information on these business units.

ResolutionRx – Dronabinol program

For the dronabinol program within our ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform, the Company plans to manufacture, on a pilot scale, one or more new proprietary formulations of dronabinol with the enhanced properties described in our patent applications, for which we plan to spend approximately $150,000 to bench test in vitro several versions of dronabinol formulations in order to determine those with the best physico-chemical properties. To finance these efforts, the Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” of this prospectus for more information.

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of previously issued warrantsits put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company intends to purchase sharesspend approximately $450,000 to $600,000 of these funds on the continued development of a proprietary formulation of dronabinol. This development would include (i) improvements to the Company’s intellectual property position, (ii) improvements to our dronabinol formulation’s PK profile, (iii) improvements to regulatory compliance, and (iv) expenditures for the initial stocking of clinical supply, packaging and distribution in anticipation of a Phase 2 PK/PD clinical trial and a pivotal Phase 3 clinical study. The performance of the Phase 2 PK/PD clinical trial and Phase 3 clinical study, however, would need yet additional funds either from separate financings or a collaboration with a strategic partner.

EndeavourRx – AMPAkines program

For the AMPAkines program within our EndeavourRx neuromodulators platform, the Company plans to initiate clinical testing of our common stock. The table below summarizesAMPAkines in the warrants outstanding astreatment of September 30, 2010 that were issued in connection with prior offerings and placementsSCI. To this end, approximately $145,000 would be utilized to assess the purity of our common stock.existing drug supplies and finalize a clinical trial protocol for a Phase 2A clinical trial to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic (“PK”) properties of one of our lead AMPAkines in patients who have had SCI. These tasks are critical for applying to the FDA for permission to amend our existing IND or initiate a new IND enabling the commencement of clinical trials. To finance these efforts, the Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” of this prospectus for more information.

 

Date of Issuance

  Exercise Price  per
Share
   Number of Warrants
Outstanding as of
September 30, 2010
   

Expiration Date

  Approximate Potential
Proceeds, if Fully
Exercised
 

January 2007(1)

  $1.66     2,996,927    January 21, 2012  $4,975,000  

August 2007(1)

  $2.64     2,830,000    August 28, 2012  $7,471,000  

August 2007(2)

  $3.96     176,875    August 28, 2012  $700,000  

April 2009(1)

  $0.27     6,941,176    October 17, 2012  $1,889,000  

April 2009(2)

  $0.26     433,824    October 17, 2012  $113,000  

July 2009(1)

  $0.27     6,060,470    January 31, 2013  $1,636,000  

July 2009(2)

  $0.37     606,047    January 31, 2013  $222,000  

June 2010(1)(3)

  $0.21     4,081,633    June 7, 2012  $841,000  

(1)

Represents warrants issued to the investor(s) in the related transaction.

(2)

Represents warrants issued to the placement agent(s) in the related transaction.

(3)

See Note 2 to Notes to Condensed Financial Statements, dated September 30, 2010.

The warrants issuedAssuming financing is obtained in addition to the investornet proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company would continue to focus on SCI, as we believe it would be the most efficient expenditure of our resources and yield an actionable result in April 2009 were originally issued atthe shortest period of time. Expenditures would include: (i) an estimated spend of $200,000 for chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) efforts, depending on the assessment of our drug supplies, (ii) an estimated spend of $400,000 on an initial Phase 2A single ascending dose safety and PK and pharmacodynamic (“PD”) study in human SCI patients, (iii) an estimated spend of $600,000 on a Phase 2A multiple ascending dose safety and PK and PD study in SCI patients, and (iv) an estimated spend of $650,000 on a Phase 2B efficacy study in SCI patients. Our anticipated spend for ADHD would be approximately $100,000 with the larger spends occurring later dependent upon availability of financing.

EndeavourRx – GABAkines program

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise price of $0.3401 per share. In February 2010,its put right under the exercise price of these warrants was reducedPurchase Agreement, the Company plans to $0.2721 in exchange for the investor’s consent and waiverfinance efforts with respect to the Company’s completed financing transactionGABAkines program within our EndeavourRx neuromodulators platform. These efforts would be in preparation of an IND to be submitted to the FDA to commence human studies of KRM-II-81, our lead GABAkine drug candidate, for treatment-resistant epilepsy, and expenditures would include (i) an estimated spend of $530,000 for CMC efforts, (ii) an estimated spend of $450,000 for pre-clinical pharmacology, safety and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (“ADME”) studies, (iii) an estimated spend of $225,000 for animal safety studies and (iv) an estimated spend of $65,000 for regulatory consultants.

In connection with Samyang in January 2010 (see Note 2 to Notes to Condensed Financial Statements, dated September 30, 2010).

the organization and development of the ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx business units, we are planning certain corporate and development actions as summarized below. All of the warrants outstanding frombelow are subject to raising additional financing and/or entering into strategic relationships, of which no assurance can be given.

Proposed Creation of Subsidiaries

Pending approval by the January 2007 transactionBoard, management intends to organize our ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx business units into two subsidiaries: (i) a ResolutionRx subsidiary, into which we intend to contribute our pharmaceutical cannabinoid platform and its related tangible and intangible assets and certain of its liabilities and (ii) an EndeavourRx subsidiary, into which we plan to contribute our neuromodulator platform, including both the AMPAkine and GABAkine programs and their related tangible and intangible assets and certain of their liabilities.

Management believes that there are several advantages to separating these platforms formally into newly formed subsidiaries, including but not limited to optimizing their asset values through separate finance channels and making them more attractive for capital raising as well as for strategic deal making.

Employee/Consultant Infrastructure Build-out

In order to broaden our operational expertise, we are planning to hire a number of highly qualified individuals, either as employees or consultants and, in tandem, increase our administrative support function.

Our relationship with Drs. Cook and Witkin has been highly cooperative to date. Our intent is to contractually formalize these relationships as consultants to the Company.

Key contracts

The Purisys Agreement and the UIC License Agreement will need to be transferred or otherwise made available to the ResolutionRx subsidiary. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Manufacturing” and “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Technology Rights—University of Illinois License Agreement” for more information on these agreements. While this subsidiary’s initial, primary focus will be on repurposing dronabinol for the treatment of OSA, we believe that our broad enabling patents and a new proprietary formulation may provide a call rightframework for expanding into the larger burgeoning pharmaceutical cannabinoid industry. We believe that by creating this subsidiary, it may be possible, through separate finance channels and potential strategic transactions, to optimize the asset value not only of the ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform, but our EndeavourRx neuromodulator platform as well.

Prospective Investors

We have had discussions with a number of potential cannabinoid investors and strategic partners who have expressed interest, mostly in the development of a new, proprietary formulation with extended patent life. Forming a new subsidiary for our favorcannabinoid platform or our neuromodulator platform may allow us to attract financing from investors with a desire to invest in one platform but not the other.

Intellectual Property

The Company has exclusive rights to issued and pending patents claiming cannabinoid compositions and methods for treating cannabinoid-sensitive disorders, including sleep apnea, pain, glaucoma, muscular spasticity, anorexia and other conditions. In October 2019, we filed a continuation-in-part for our pending patent that describes and claims novel doses, controlled release compositions and methods of use for cannabinoids, as well as a new U.S. provisional patent application further disclosing novel dosage and controlled release compositions and methods of use for cannabinoids, alone or in combination, including with cannabinoid and non-cannabinoid molecules. Specific claims describe low dosage strengths and controlled release formulations for attaining a therapeutic window of cannabinoid blood levels that produce the desired therapeutic effects for a controlled period of time, while minimizing undesirable side effects. As previously disclosed, the original patents were filed by the Company and are now included in the UIC License Agreement. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Technology Rights—University of Illinois License Agreement” for more information on the UIC License Agreement. While no assurance can be provided that the claims in this continuation-in-part or the U.S. provisional patent application will be allowed in whole or in part, or that the patents will ultimately issue, we believe that these new filings, if allowed, will provide market protections through at least 2031.

We believe our intellectual property initiatives may afford expanding strategic options and market exclusivity in the burgeoning pharmaceutical cannabinoid business sector. New cannabinoid formulation technology is headed in the direction of enhanced absorption. These technologies, including nano- and micro-emulsions and thin films, have been shown to bypass the normal route of absorption and liver metabolism of cannabinoids, thus dramatically increasing blood levels and allowing for the use of low doses. Similarly, technologies may be used to achieve a controlled release of dronabinol, and we believe that our pending patent priority relating back to 2010 predates the efforts of others seeking to develop low-dose or extended release formulations of cannabinoids. Thus, to the extent that new technologies result in lower doses and/or controlled release formulations, we believe they would infringe on our pending patents once issued, not only for use in the closing pricetreatment of OSA but potentially a wide variety of other indications as well.

Data from our Phase 2 clinical trials has allowed us to design new proprietary formulations of dronabinol, disclosed in our patent filings and optimized for the treatment of not only OSA, but also other indications. Within the past 12 to 24 months, new formulation technology has emerged potentially allowing for the creation of a proprietary dronabinol formulation with optimized dose and duration of action for treating OSA. We have discussions in progress with a number of companies that have existing cannabinoid formulation technologies, expertise, and licensure capabilities, which may lead to the development of a proprietary formulation of dronabinol for the Company based on our pending patents for low-dose and extended release dronabinol and may lead to the development of a marketable proprietary formulation of dronabinol. We believe that the development of a novel, proprietary formulation of dronabinol would only extend time to market entry by approximately 12 months compared to the currently available generic soft gel capsules, but would dramatically extend market exclusivity; however, no assurance can be provided that any of the formulation technologies that we are currently analyzing will result in viable products or that formulation agreements will be consummated on terms acceptable to us. The failure to consummate a formulation agreement would materially and adversely affect the Company.

The Opportunity to Improve Dronabinol Formulations

Dronabinol is currently marketed as a soft gelatin capsule that suffers from several major deficiencies.

First, dronabinol exhibits poor and erratic absorption. Δ9-THC is not water soluble. The market dominant commercial gelcap dronabinol is currently formulated as a sesame oil-based liquid within a soft gelatin capsule. The absorption of dronabinol after oral administration is poor and highly variable with some patients achieving very high levels and others achieving very low levels. This erratic absorption may be responsible for the variable therapeutic responses observed in dronabinol clinical trials. Syndros®, on the other hand, is formulated as a solution in dehydrated alcohol, polyethylene glycol and other materials and exhibits its own challenges and deficiencies, including but not limited to it being Schedule II as compared to the capsule that is Schedule III.

Second, dronabinol is rapidly and extensively (approximately 80%) metabolized upon first pass through the liver, resulting in low blood levels. Additionally, dronabinol has a relatively short half-life (approximately 3 – 4 hours) and, in its present formulation, is not optimally suited for therapeutic indications requiring blood levels to be sustained for 6 hours or longer.

Third, in order to achieve sustained, therapeutic blood levels, we have found it necessary to use higher doses of dronabinol in our OSA clinical trials. For example, over an 8-hour period, the 2.5 mg and 10 mg doses produced therapeutically equivalent effects during the first 4 hours, but only the 10 mg dose produced therapeutic effects during the second 4 hours. Unfortunately, the 10 mg dose produces a higher occurrence of side effects than the 2.5 mg dose (as described in the Marinol® package insert). We anticipate focusing on new formulations that would achieve the blood levels produced by the lower doses for a sustained time period, resulting in the desired therapeutic effect(s) while minimizing undesirable side effects.

Large Commercial Opportunity

As a serious public health issue, the important need for diagnosing and ultimately treating OSA has recently been highlighted by the FDA clearance of several sleep apnea home test kits that are now third party reimbursed. Further highlighting this need, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE: CVS) announced the implementation of a program to diagnose and treat OSA initially within their own in-store, walk-in MinuteClinics. If implemented throughout their HealthHUB store network, the number of people diagnosed with sleep apnea and eligible for treatment should increase dramatically. Fitbit (NYSE: FIT), the health oriented smart watch company is seeking clearance from the FDA to diagnose sleep apnea. We believe that the combination of more efficient and patient friendly diagnostic procedures and, ultimately, pharmaceutical treatments such as those we are developing will encourage more patients to seek diagnosis and treatment. As noted above, there are approximately 29 million OSA patients in the United States and an additional 26 million in Germany and 8 million in the United Kingdom. There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of OSA.

As noted below in “—Proposed Regulatory Process,” there are several ways to achieve market exclusivity with respect to this large and underserved patient population.

Proposed Regulatory Process

In conjunction with its management and consultants, the Company intends to file a new NDA under Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (as amended, the “FDCA” and such NDA a “505(b)(2) NDA”), claiming the efficacy and safety of our common stock exceeds $3.35 per shareproposed proprietary dronabinol formulation in the treatment of OSA. We believe the use of dronabinol for 13 consecutive trading days,the treatment of OSA is a novel indication for an already approved drug, making it eligible for a 505(b)(2) NDA, as opposed to the submission and approval of a full 505(b)(1) NDA.

The 505(b)(2) NDA was created by the Hatch-Waxman Act, as amended (the “Hatch-Waxman Act”), which amended the FDCA to help avoid unnecessary duplication of studies already performed on a previously approved drug. As amended, the FDCA gives the FDA express permission to rely on data not developed by the NDA applicant. Accordingly, a 505(b)(2) NDA contains full safety and effectiveness reports but allows at least some of the information required for NDA approval, such as safety and efficacy information on the active ingredient, to come from studies not conducted by or for the applicant. This can result in a less expensive and faster route to approval, compared with a traditional development path, such as 505(b)(1), while still allowing for the creation of new, differentiated products. The 505(b)(2) NDA regulatory path offers the applicant market protections, such as market exclusivity, under the Hatch-Waxman Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. Other, international regulatory routes are available to pursue proprietary formulations of dronabinol and would provide further market protections. For example, in Europe, a regulatory approval route similar to the 505(b)(2) pathway is the hybrid procedure based on Article 10 of Directive 2001/83/EC.

We have worked with regulatory consultants who will assist with FDA filings and regulatory strategy. If we can secure sufficient financing, of which no assurance can be provided, we anticipate requesting a pre-IND meeting with the FDA. This meeting also could create the type of dialogue with the FDA that is normally communicated at an end-of Phase 2 meeting. The FDA responses to this meeting will be incorporated into an IND.

If we can secure sufficient financing, of which no assurance can be provided, we plan to propose conducting the appropriate clinical studies with our proprietary controlled release formulation in OSA patients to determine safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy, as well as a standard Phase 1 clinical study to determine potential abuse liability. When a Phase 3 study is required for a 505(b)(2), usually only one study with fewer patients is necessary versus the two, large scale, confirmatory studies generally required for the standard 505(b)(1) NDA. While no assurance can be provided, with an extensive safety database tracking chronic, long-term use of Marinol® and generics, we believe that the FDA should not have major safety concerns with dronabinol in the treatment of OSA.

The Company has worked with the investigators who conducted the Phase 2B clinical trial, as well as with our Clinical Advisory Panel to design a draft Phase 3 protocol that, based on the experience and results from the Phase 2A and Phase 2B trials, we believe will provide sufficient data for FDA approval of a RespireRx dronabinol controlled release formulation for OSA. The current version of the protocol is designed as a 90-day randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study of dronabinol in the treatment of OSA. Depending on feedback from the FDA, the Company estimates that the Phase 3 trial would require between 120 and 300 patients at 15 to 20 sites, and take 18 to 24 months to complete, at a cost of between $10 million and $14 million.

We believe our rights under the Purisys Agreement would help facilitate regulatory approval. Under the Purisys Agreement, Purisys has agreed to (i) provide all of the API estimated to be needed for the clinical development process for first- and second-generation products, three validation batches for NDA filings and adequate supply for the initial inventory stocking for the wholesale and retail channels, subject to certain circumstances.

limitations, (ii) maintain or file valid DMFs with the FDA or any other regulatory authority and provide the Company with access or a right of reference letter entitling the Company to make continuing reference to the DMFs during the term of the agreement in connection with any regulatory filings made with the FDA by the Company, (iii) participate on a development committee, and (iv) make available its regulatory consultants, collaborate with any regulatory consulting firms engaged by the Company and participate in all FDA or DEA meetings as appropriate and as related to the API.

Similarly,In consideration for these supplies and services, the Company has agreed to (i) purchase exclusively from Purisys, during the commercialization phase, all API for these products at a pre-determined price subject to certain circumstances,producer price adjustments and (ii) allow Purisys’s participation in the warrants issuedeconomic success of the commercialized products up to the investorearlier of the achievement of a maximum dollar amount or the expiration of a period of time. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Manufacturing” for information on the Purisys Agreement.

Results of Operations

The Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discussed herein are presented below.

  Six-months ended  Year ended 
  June 30,  

December 31,

 
  2020  2019  2019  2018 
Operating expenses:                
General and administrative $829,019  $594,904  $1,137,175  $1,488,238 
Research and development  308,466   297,350   599,329   688,286 
Total operating expenses  1,137,485   892,254   

1,736,504

   2,176,524 
Loss from operations  (1,137,485)  (892,254)  (1,736,504)  (2,176,524)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other liabilities in exchange for equity  (323,996)  -   -  (166,382)
Interest expense  (331,316)  (151,645)  (404,661)  (136,243)
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)  29,942  26,354   26,132   (112,641)
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(1,762,855) $(1,017,545) $(2,115,033) $(2,591,790)
                 
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.04) $(0.26) $(0.54) $(0.77)
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  49,320,761   3,872,076   3,908,479   3,351,105 

Six-months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

Revenues. The Company had no revenues during the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

General and Administrative. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, general and administrative expenses were $829,019, an increase of $234,115, as compared to $594,904 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the six-months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to an increase in general and administrative salaries of $49,525 with the addition of compensation and benefits for our new Chief Executive Officer and President effective May 6, 2020, an increase general legal fees of $154,326, primarily related to legal fees associated with the April 20092020 and July 2009 transactions provide a call right in our favor toJune 2020 convertible note financings, the extent that the closing price of our common stock exceeds $0.68 per share and $0.54 per share, respectively, for 20 consecutive trading days. Warrants issued to the placement agent for the April 2009 and July 2009 transactions provide a call right in our favor to the extent that the closing price of our common stock exceeds $0.52 per share and $0.54 per share, respectively, for 20 consecutive trading days, subject to certain circumstances. Warrants issued to Samyang in connection with the conversion of its promissory note in June 2010 provide a call right in our favor to the extent that the weighted average closing price of our common stock exceeds $0.309 per share for each of ten consecutive trading days, subject to certain circumstances.

None of the warrants detailed above are “in-the-money” as of September 30, 2010. We can give no assurance that we will receive proceeds from the exercise of any of the outstanding warrants.

As of September 30, 2010, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaling approximately $4,508,000 and working capital of approximately $3,047,000. In comparison, as of December 31, 2009, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of approximately $226,000 and a working capital deficit of approximately $1,976,000. The increases in cash and working capital primarily reflect amounts received from our March 2010 transaction with Biovail, as detailed above, as partially offset by amounts required to fund our operations.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $2,810,000 and included our net income for the period of approximately $2,613,000, adjusted for non-cash expenses for depreciation, amortization, warrants and stock compensation approximating $867,000, and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $6,003,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and included our net loss for the period of approximately $6,842,000, adjusted for non-cash expenses for depreciation and stock compensation approximating $602,000, and changes in operating assets and liabilities.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash used in investing activities approximated $2,250,000 and primarily represented the purchases of marketable securities, partially offset by some maturities of such marketable securities. Net cash provided by investing activities approximated $2,714,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and represented the proceeds from the sales and maturities of marketable securities, partially offset by minimal fixed asset purchase and sale activity.

Net cash provided by financing activities approximated $1,472,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and resulted from our private placement of a convertible promissory note in January 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net cash provided by financing activities approximated $2,940,000 due to our registered direct offering of our 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock in April 2009 and our private placement of our Series F Convertible Preferred Stock in July 2009.

In October 2010, we were awarded a grant of approximately $245,000 under a program created by the U.S. Congress in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. The grant reimburses certain qualifying research expenses related to our AMPAKINE CX1739.

Commitments

We lease approximately 32,000 square feet of research laboratory, office and expansion space under an operating lease that expires May 31, 2012. The commitments under the lease agreement for the remaining three months of the year ended December 31, 2010, the year ending December 31, 2011 and the five months ending May 31, 2012 are approximately $141,000, $581,000 and $248,000, respectively.

In addition to amounts reflected on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2010, our remaining commitments for preclinical and clinical studies amount to approximately $423,000, including approximately $155,000 for research related to the grant from the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, which costs will be covered by funds awarded but not yet received under the grant.

In March 2009, each of our executive officers agreed to a 20% reduction in their base salary in an effort to conserve our available financial resources. Following the closing of the transaction with Biovail in March 2010 (see Note 3 to Notes to Condensed Financial Statements, dated September 30, 2010), the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved the reinstatement of the prior base salary for each of the executive officers, effective June 1, 2010. However, the Compensation Committee did not approve the payment of any shortfall in salaries for such executive officers from the time the reductions were implemented to the date the base salary levels were reinstated. Subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee, it is possible that some of the shortfall amounts will be paid to the executive officers in the future, but the timing and amount of any such payments cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

In June 2000, we received approximately $247,000 from the Institute for the Study of Aging, or the Institute, a non-profit foundation supported by the Estee Lauder Trust. The advance partially offset our limited costs for our testing in patients with mild cognitive impairment that we conducted with our partner, Servier. Provided that we comply with the conditions of the funding agreement, including the restricted use of the amounts received, we will not be required to repay the advance unless we enter an AMPAKINE compound into Phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. Upon such potential clinical trials, repayment would include interest computed at a rate equal to one-half of the prime lending rate. In lieu of cash, in the event of repayment the Institute may elect to receive the balance of outstanding principal and accrued interest as shares of our common stock. The conversion price for such form of repayment shall initially equal $4.50 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances.

Staffing

We currently have 11 full-time employees. We do not anticipate significant increasesincrease in the number of our full-time employees withinauthorized shares that required the coming year.

Outlook

Withfiling of a Form DEF 14C with the proceeds from our transactionSecurities and Exchange Commission and a filing with Biovail in March 2010, as discussed more fully above, we believe that we have adequate financial resources to conduct our operations into the second quarterState of 2011. Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is forward-looking information, and actual results could vary.

Our ongoing cash requirements will depend on numerous factors, particularly the progress of our clinical trials involving CX1739 and our ability to negotiate and complete collaborative agreements or out-licensing arrangements. In order to help fund our on-going operating cash requirements, we intend to seek new collaborations for our “low impact” and “high impact” AMPAKINE programs that include initial cash payments and on-going development support. We may also seek to raise additional funds and explore other strategic and financial alternatives, such as a merger or sale of assets transaction.

There are significant uncertainties as to our ability to access potential sources of capital. We may not be able to enter into any collaboration on terms acceptable to us, or at all, due to conditions in the pharmaceutical industry or in the economy in general. Competition for such arrangements is intense, with a large number of biopharmaceutical companies attempting to secure alliances with more established pharmaceutical companies. Although we have been engaged in discussions with candidate companies, there is no assurance that an agreement or agreements will arise from these discussions in a timely manner, or at all, or that revenues that may be generated thereby will offset operating expenses sufficiently to reduce our short-term funding requirements.

Even if we are successful in obtaining a collaboration for our AMPAKINE program, we may have to relinquish rights to technologies, product candidates or markets that we might otherwise seek to develop ourselves. These same risks apply to any attempt to out-license our compounds.

Similarly, due to market conditionsDelaware, and other possible limitations on equity offerings, we may not be able to sell additional securities or raise other funds on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any additional equity financing, if available, would likely result in substantial dilution to existing stockholders.

Additional Risks and Uncertainties

Our proposed products are in the preclinical or early clinical stage of development and will require significant further research, development, clinical testing and regulatory clearances. They are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of products based on innovative technologies. These risks include, but are not limited to, the possibilities that any or all of the proposed products will be found to be ineffective or unsafe, or otherwise fail to receive necessary regulatory clearances; that the proposed products, although effective, will be uneconomical to market; that third parties may now or in the future hold proprietary rights that preclude us from marketing them; or that third parties will market superior or equivalent products. Accordingly, we are unable to predict whether our research and development activities will result in any commercially viable products or applications. Further, due to the extended testing and regulatory review process required before marketing clearance can be obtained, we do not expect to be able to commercialize any therapeutic drug for at least four years, either directly or through our current or prospective partners or licensees. There can be no assurance that our proposed products will prove to be safe or effective or receive regulatory approvals that are required for commercial sale.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not engaged in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

BUSINESS

We were incorporated in Delaware on February 10, 1987 under our original name, X-Age, Inc. On February 8, 2002, we changed our name to Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

We are engaged in the discovery and development of innovative pharmaceuticals for the treatment of psychiatric disorders and neurological diseases. Our primary focus is to develop novel small molecule compounds that positively modulate AMPA-type glutamate receptors, a complex of proteins involved in the communication between nerve cells in the mammalian brain. These compounds, termed AMPAKINE® compounds, enhance the activity of the AMPA receptor. These molecules are designed and developed as proprietary pharmaceuticals because we believe they hold promise for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric diseases and disorders that are known, or thought, to involve depressed functioning of pathways in the brain that use glutamate as a neurotransmitter. Our most advanced clinical compound is CX1739, which is in Phase II clinical development.

The AMPAKINE platform addresses large potential markets. According to research data from IMS Health, in 2008 worldwide sales for central nervous system products to treat brain-related disorders and diseases exceeded $112 billion. Our business plan involves partnering with larger pharmaceutical companies for research, development, clinical testing, manufacturing and global marketing of specific AMPAKINE compounds for those indications that require sizable, expensive Phase III clinical trials — and very large sales forces to achieve significant market penetration. Diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, or MCI, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, or ADHD, schizophrenia, depression, respiratory depression caused by opiate analgesics, and sleep apnea may benefit from treatment with AMPAKINE drugs and require a large market presence.

At the same time, we plan to develop compounds internally for a selected set of indications, some of which will allow us to apply for “Orphan Drug” status. Such designation by the Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, is usually applied to products where the number of patients in the United States, or the U.S., in the given disease category is typically less than 200,000. The European Medicines Agency adopted a similar system termed “The Regulation of Orphan Medicinal Products.” These Orphan Drug indications typically require more modest investment in the development stages, follow a quicker regulatory path to approval, and involve a more concentrated and smaller sales force targeted at selected medical centers in the U.S. and Europe. Such Orphan Drug indications that we plan to pursue internally may include Huntington’s disease, Fragile X syndrome and Rett syndrome.

We also may pursue other Orphan Drug indications and upon any related approval, may expand our clinical potential into non-Orphan Drug indications. As an example, if we obtain approval for an indication related to Fragile X syndrome, expansion into treatment of autism-spectrum disorders may follow. While the market potential in the U.S. for most of the listed Orphan Drug indications varies between $100 million and $500 million per indication, we estimate that the consolidated potential for all indications that we may pursue, including expansion into non-Orphan Drug indications, provides us with a market potential of over $3 billion. This amount does not include any revenues from any potential license of our intellectual property. We will continue to seek one or more significant license or collaboration arrangements with larger pharmaceutical companies, while we prepare ourselves for potential entrance into the pharmaceutical market with our own products. These arrangements may permit other applications of the AMPAKINE compounds to be advanced into later stages of clinical development and may provide access to the extensive clinical trials management, manufacturing and marketing expertise of such companies.

In January 1999, we entered into a research collaboration and exclusive worldwide license agreement with Organon, at that time a subsidiary of Akzo Nobel. The agreement granted Organon worldwide rights to develop and commercialize our AMPAKINE technology for the treatment of schizophrenia and depression. In November 2007, Organon was acquired by Schering-Plough Corporation. Subsequently, in November 2009, Merck acquired Schering Plough. Following its merger with Shering-Plough, in September 2010 Merck notified us that it would not be proceeding further with the licensed AMPAKINE technology.

As a result, rights to the use of AMPAKINE compounds for the treatment of schizophrenia and depression were returned to us. Merck retains ownership of the compounds developed by Organon or developed jointly by Organon with us during the collaboration, but no longer has license rights to our patents or know-how. We are free to pursue strategic opportunities for all of our other AMPAKINE compounds in schizophrenia and depression.

In October 2000, we entered into a research collaboration agreement and a license agreement with Servier. The license agreement, as amended to date, will allow Servier to develop and commercialize three AMPAKINE compounds selected at the end of the research collaboration in defined territories of Europe, Asia, the Middle East and certain South American countries as a treatment for (i) declines in cognitive performance associated with aging, (ii) neurodegenerative diseases and (iii) anxiety disorders. The indications covered include, but are not limited to, Alzheimer’s disease, MCI, sexual dysfunction and anxiety disorders. The research collaboration with Servier was terminated at the end of 2006; accordingly, the worldwide rights for (a) treatment of declines in cognitive performance associated with aging, (b) neurodegenerative diseases, (c) anxiety disorders, and (d) sexual dysfunction have been returned to us. In November 2010, Servier selected a jointly discovered high impact AMPAKINE compound to advance into Phase I clinical testing. Should the compound be successfully commercialized by Servier, the Company would receive payments based upon key clinical development milestones and royalty payments on sales in licensed territories.

On March 25, 2010, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Biovail. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, Biovail acquired our interests in CX717, CX1763, CX1942 and the injectable dosage form of CX1739,general matters as well as certainan increase in patent legal fees of our other AMPAKINE compounds and related intellectual property for use in the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. In connection with the transaction, Biovail paid us the lump sum of $9,000,000 upon the execution of the asset purchase agreement$13,659 and an additional $1,000,000 upon completionincrease in directors and officers liability insurance and other insurance costs of $10,162, offset by the specified transfer plannet effect of increases and decreases in September 2010. In addition, we will have the right to receive up to three milestone paymentsother general and administrative expenses. There was no stock-based compensation in an aggregate amount of up to $15,000,000 plus the reimbursement of certain relatedgeneral and administrative expenses each conditioned upon the occurrence of particular events relating to the clinical development of certain assets that Biovail acquired. As part of the transaction, Biovail licensed back to us certain exclusive and irrevocable rights to some acquired AMPAKINE compounds, other than CX717, an injectable dosage form of CX1739, CX1763 and CX1942, for use outside of the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. Accordingly, following the transaction with Biovail, we retain rights for the majority of patented compounds in our AMPAKINE drug library, as well as all rights to the non-acquired AMPAKINE compounds for the treatment of neurological diseasessix-months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.

Research and psychiatric disorders that have historically been a focus of our portfolio. Additionally, we retain our rights to develop and commercialize AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders, including an oral dosage form of CX1739.

In September 2010, Biovail merged with Valeant. As a result of Valeant’s merger and changes in strategic directions for the combined company, Valeant announced its intent to exit several therapeutic development programs, including the respiratory depression project acquired from the Company. The Company is in discussions with Valeant regarding the future of the project and under the agreement between the Company and Biovail, all contractual obligations remain in place.

Development. For the yearssix-months ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, ourJune 30, 2020, research and development expenses were approximately $4,598,000, $10,780,000$308,466, an increase of $11,116, as compared to $297,350 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in research and $9,327,000, respectively.development expenses for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the six-months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily a result of an adjustment to one research contract, an increase in research and development related insurance and the payment of option fee associated with the option agreement related to the UWMRF Patent License Agreement. There was no stock-based compensation in research and development expenses for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.

Interest Expense. During the six-months ended June 30, 2020, interest expense was $331,316 as compared to $151,645 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The significant decreaseincrease of $179,671 is primarily the result of interest and amortization of note discounts to interest expense with respect to the convertible notes arising in expensesAugust, October and November 2019 that were included in the current year three-month period but did not exist in the prior year comparable three-month period.

Foreign Currency Transaction (Loss) Gain. Foreign currency transaction gain was $29,942 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to a foreign currency transaction gain of $26,354 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The foreign currency transaction (loss) gain relates to the $399,774 loan from SY Corporation made in June 2012, which is denominated in the South Korean Won.

Loss on Extinguishment of Convertible Debt. The loss on extinguishment of convertible debt during the six-months ended June 30, 2020 was $323,996 as compared to $0 in the six-months ended June 30, 2019. On March 21, 2020, the Company entered into exchange agreements with several note holders and exchanged an aggregate of $255,786 of principal and accrued interest for 17,052,424 shares of the Company’s stock with an exchange price of $0.015 per share which was less than the closing price of $0.034 per share. There was no loss on extinguishment of convertible debt during the six-months ended June 30, 2019.

Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, the Company incurred a net loss of $816,137 as compared to a net loss of $477,213 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. Included in the net loss is a loss on extinguishment of convertible debt of $323,996.

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $1,762,855 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $2,115,033 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 respectively, as well as negative operating cash flows of $106,448 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $487,745 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The Company also had a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,846,748 at June 30, 2020 and expects to continue to incur net losses and negative operating cash flows for at least the next few years. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its audit report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 reflects our reduction2019, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is currently, and has for some time, been in forcesignificant financial distress. It has extremely limited cash resources and current assets and has no ongoing source of sustainable revenue. Management is continuing to address various aspects of the Company’s operations and obligations, including, without limitation, debt obligations, financing requirements, establishment of new and maintenance and improvement of existing and in-process intellectual property, licensing agreements, legal and patent matters and regulatory compliance, and has taken steps to continue to raise new debt and equity capital to fund the Company’s business activities from both related and unrelated parties to fund the Company’s business activities.

The Company is continuing its efforts to raise additional capital in order to be able to pay its liabilities and fund its business activities on a going forward basis, including the pursuit of the Company’s planned research and development activities. The Company regularly evaluates various measures to satisfy the Company’s liquidity needs, including development and other agreements with collaborative partners and, when necessary, seeking to exchange or restructure the Company’s outstanding securities. The Company is evaluating certain changes to its operations and structure to facilitate raising capital from sources that was implementedmay be interested in March 2009, in an effort to reduce our operating expenses and focus our resources onfinancing only discrete aspects of the clinicalCompany’s development programs. Such changes could include a significant reorganization, which may include the formation of one or more subsidiaries into which one or more of our AMPAKINE platform. Expensesprograms may be contributed. As a result of the Company’s current financial situation, the Company has limited access to external sources of debt and equity financing. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to secure additional financing in the amounts necessary to fully fund its operating and debt service requirements. If the Company is unable to access sufficient cash resources, the Company may be forced to discontinue its operations entirely and liquidate.

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

Revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had no revenues.

General and Administrative. For the year ended December 31, 2019, general and administrative expenses were $1,137,175, a decrease of $351,063, as compared to $1,488,238 for the year ended December 31, 2008 reflect an increase2018.

Stock-based compensation costs and fees included in clinical developmentgeneral and administrative expenses including our two Phase IIa studies with CX717were $0 for the acute treatmentDecember 31, 2019, as compared to $14,248 for the year ended December 31, 2018, reflecting a decrease of respiratory depression induced$14,248. The decrease is the result of the fact that no stock-based compensation was granted to general and administrative employees of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2019. Salaries and employee benefits included in general and administrative expenses were $439,807 for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to $685,884 for the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease of $246,077. The decrease is primarily due to the full year elimination of the salary and employee benefits of the former Chief Executive Officer and President in the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the elimination of only one quarter of a year of such expenses in the year ended December 31, 2018. Legal fees for general corporate purposes were $213,289 for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to $278,373 for the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease of $65,084. Legal fees for patents and other patent expenses included in general and administrative expenses were $147,722 for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $51,641 as compared to $199,363 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decreases in both general legal fees and legal fees associated with patents and other patent costs is a result of a reduction in utilization of professional resources as part of the Company’s cost control efforts, partially offset by an opioidpatent legal fees associated with patent filings made in October 2019.

The remaining $25,987 of increases in general and the initiation of clinical development of CX1739.

We faceadministrative expenses is due to a number of risks in moving our technology through research, development and commercialization. We have never had revenues from commercial sales, have never been profitable on an annual basis and have incurred cumulative net losses from inception approximating $113,151,000 through September 30, 2010. We do not anticipate profitability in the short term and will continue to require external funding, either from key corporate partnerships and licenses of our technology or from the private or public equity markets, debt from banking arrangements or some combination of these financing vehicles. As of yet, neither we nor any of our corporate partners have obtained regulatory approval to market any of our products. All of these risks, and others, are described in “Risk Factors” starting on page 4.

Our executive offices are located at 15241 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, California 92618, and our telephone number is (949) 727-3157.

Our website is www.cortexpharm.com. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The contents of our website are not incorporatedincreases partially offset by reference into this prospectus.

AMPA Receptor Modulator Program

In June 1993, we licensed a new class of molecules and technology, the AMPAKINE technology, from the University of California. We have subsequently been working to develop and patent new AMPAKINE molecules and to demonstrate efficacy and safetydecreases in a number of potential indications.other expense categories.

AMPAKINE compounds facilitateResearch and Development. For the activityyear ended December 31, 2019, research and development expenses were $599,329, a decrease of $88,957, as compared to $688,286 for the AMPA receptor, which is activated by the endogenous neurotransmitter glutamate. The AMPAKINE compounds interact inyear ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a highly specific manner with the AMPA receptor, lowering the amount of neurotransmitter required to generate a response, and increasing the magnitude and/or duration of the response to any given amount of glutamate. We believe that this selective amplification of the normal glutamate signal may eventually find utilitydecrease in the treatmentutilization of neurologicalconsultants and psychological diseases and disorders characterized by depressed functioninga decrease in research contract expenses.

Loss on Extinguishment of brain pathways.

Our AMPAKINE technology is composed of two groups of compounds that we have designated as “low impact” and “high impact.” Compounds from these two groups bind at different sites on the AMPA receptor complex and affect the subsequent cellular responses in different ways. Both types of compounds positively modulate the AMPA receptor function; low impact compounds generally increase the amplitude of the neuronal action potential, while the high impact compounds increase both the amplitude and the half-width of the neuronal action potential. Additionally, high impact compounds activate the expression of certain genes in the neuron, including the production of certain growth factors such as Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, or BDNF. BDNF mediates the differentiation and survival of neurons by providing the necessary trophic support, and modulates synaptic transmission and plasticity. We believe that this action of AMPAKINE molecules imparts these compounds with the potential for disease-modifying activity, since deficits in BDNF have been observed in psychiatric diseases such as anxiety and depression, and in neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Rett’s syndrome.

The vast majority of excitatory synaptic connections in the brain utilize glutamate, and those synaptic connections decline with age. Thus, brain disorders associated with aging may be amenable to treatment with AMPAKINE compounds. Such disorders include MCI, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Schizophrenia, depressionDebt and other psychiatric disorders may involve imbalancesLiabilities in Exchange for Equity. There was no loss on extinguishment of neurotransmitters in the brain, such as dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine and norepinephrine. Given that glutamate modulates many of thesedebt or other neurotransmitters, it may play a role in the rebalancing of neurotransmission.

We continue to design, synthesize and test new AMPAKINE molecules. Significant progress has been made with both our “low impact” and “high impact” programs, resulting in the recent filing of patent applications that, if granted, will provide patent protection for our new molecules through 2029.

“Low Impact” AMPAKINE Platform

Prior to the transaction we entered into with Biovail on March 25, 2010, we had two low impact AMPAKINE compounds being tested in clinical studies: CX717 and CX1739. Following the sale of CX717 to Biovail, our most advanced low impact AMPAKINE compound is CX1739, which is a new generation low impact AMPAKINE molecule. The pending patent application that specifically covers CX1739, if approved, will provide a patent term until 2028.

CX1739 completed pre-clinical safety and toxicology studies in 2008 and, importantly, the toxicological artifact previously observed in animals with CX717 was not seen with CX1739. Phase I clinical studies with CX1739 were initiated in 2008 and completed in early 2009. In the Phase I clinical studies, the safety and tolerability of CX1739 was evaluated in 80 healthy, male volunteers. No changes were seen in vital signs, and there were no cardiovascular changes or changes in blood chemistry at any of the doses tested, including single doses of up to 1200mg and doses of 600mg twice-a-day (for a 1200mg total daily dose) for 7 days. The maximum well-tolerated single dose was identified at 900mg and 450 mg twice-a-day (for a 900mg total daily dose) for 7 days.

The pharmacokinetic results to date from the volunteers who have taken CX1739 show that the half-life of the drug averages 7.2 hours, and the amount of drug absorbed over the range of 50mg to 1200mg was linear and predictable. Very high plasma drug levels were found in the volunteers, indicating an excellent absorption profileliabilities for the drug. In summary, CX1739 exhibited an excellent safety profile in healthy male volunteers.

In early 2009, we initiatedyear ended December 31, 2019 as compared to a Phase IIa study with CX1739 in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 20 subjects with moderate to severe sleep apnea in the UK. Enrollment in the study was slower than expected due to several factors, including variability in sleep apnea scores, fairly strict enrollment criteria and financial constraints. We recently completed testing in this study and are currently analyzing the related results.

Given the positive results previously demonstrated with CX717 in adults with ADHD, we plan to commence a Phase II study with CX1739 as a potential treatment for ADHD.

Although CX1739 was acquired by Biovail in our March 2010 transaction, certain rights to AMPAKINE compounds sold to Biovail were retained by the Company through a grant back license from Biovail. Specifically, Biovail’s rights to CX1739 are limited to an intravenous dosage form to treat respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. Consequently, following the transaction we retained our exclusive rights to pursue the developmentloss of CX1739 in a non-intravenous dosage form and certain of the other subject AMPAKINE compounds for indications other than the treatment of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. The structure of the transaction with Biovail permits us to pursue the development of CX1739 and certain other of the acquired AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders, ADHD and other indications.

In-house research activities have led to the identification of a chemically distinct series of low impact AMPAKINE molecules, and in 2008 we filed an application for patent protection$166,382 for the core scaffoldyear ended December 31, 2018.

Interest Expense. During the year ended December 31, 2019, interest expense was $404,661 (including $60,135 to related parties of these molecules. The lead molecules in this series, CX2007 and CX2076, have successfully undergone initial early preclinical testing, and additional resources will be invested in selectingwhich $49,863 is to a lead compound from this series for further preclinical and clinical development activities. If the related application is approved, we will have patent protection for this compound series through 2028.

“High Impact” AMPAKINE Platform

Several of our “high impact” compounds have been tested in animal behavioral models. In genetic mouse models of Huntington’s disease, the high impact molecule CX929 has demonstrated the potential to restore depressed levels of the growth factor BDNF, and improve deficits in a process known as long-term potentiation, a cellular mechanism thought to underlie learning and memory. Furthermore, the use of CX929 to treat these mice has demonstrated an improvement in motor deficits that occur in mice that have not been treated with CX929. This preclinical data suggests that high impact AMPAKINE molecules might have beneficial effects in patients with Huntington’s disease.

We have also looked at the effect of AMPAKINE molecules on two different genetically altered mouse models of central nervous system disease: Rett syndrome and Fragile X syndrome. The Rett syndrome mice exhibit many of the same characteristics as the disease that occurs in girls. One aspect of the disease, the irregular breathing patterns with bouts of apnea, is a disturbing aspect of the disease in patientssingle vendor that is also seena related party representing interest on invoices subject to delayed payment), an increase of $268,418, as compared to $136,243 (including $42,821 to related parties) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in the genetically altered mice. We have found that AMPAKINE molecules can restore the breathing patterninterest expense resulted primarily from interest on five new convertible notes issued from January through March 2019 totaling $110,000 of Rett syndrome mice to a more normal, regular breathing pattern. With regard to mice that demonstrate characteristicsprincipal amount in 2019, and five additional new convertible notes issued in April, May, August, October and November 2019 totaling $393,500 of Fragile X syndrome, the current data suggests that AMPAKINE molecules, such as CX929, augment levels of the growth factor BDNF, which could be valuable for correcting abnormalities in dendritic spinesprincipal and synaptic function associatedadditional interest with Fragile X syndrome.

As noted under the caption “Risk Related to Our Business” under the “Risk Factors” section, we are at an early stage of development and we may not be able to successfully develop and commercialize our products and technologies, and there are certain risks relatedrespect to the development and commercialization of our products, including, without limitation, risks related to our clinical trials.

Potential Applications for AMPAKINE Compounds

ADHD

ADHD isSalamandra legal settlement as well as from a common psychiatric disorder in both children and adults. The National Institute of Mental Health, or the NIMH, estimates that ADHD affects three to five percent of school-age children, with about one child in every classroom in the U.S. in need of help for this disorder. ADHD is characterized by inattentiveness, poor impulse control and hyperactivity. Although the disorder has historically been thought of as a childhood illness, longitudinal studies have documented the persistence of symptoms into adulthood in a large percentage of individuals that suffered ADHD as children. The prevalence of ADHD in adults is estimated at between two to four percent. ADHD exacts a significant toll on social relationships, education, and vocational attainment.

Psychostimulants, including amphetamine and methylphenidate, represent the most widely researched and commonly prescribed treatments for ADHD. Based upon research data from IMS Health, psychostimulants accounted for a global market of approximately $5 billion in 2008. Given the availability and frequent prescribing of psychostimulants, concerns over their potential overuse and abuse have intensified. In addition to the potential for abuse with psychostimulants, the use of psychostimulants may result in side effects. According to the National Institutes of Health, some children on these medications may lose weight, have less appetite and temporarily grow more slowly, whereas others may experience problems falling asleep. Given the lack of consistent improvement beyond the disorder’s core symptoms and the deficit of long-term studies conducted, the need remains for additional testing with medications and behavioral treatments. Most of the psychostimulants also carry black box warnings related to the cardiovascular riskssingle vendor associated with the increases in blood pressure and heart rate caused by these agents.delay of cash remittances to that vendor.

We believe that AMPAKINE compounds, such as CX1739, may represent a novel, non-stimulant approach for treating ADHD patients.

Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive ImpairmentForeign Currency Transaction Loss or Gain.

Impairment The foreign currency transaction gain was $26,132 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to a foreign currency transaction loss of memory and cognition$112,641 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The foreign currency transaction loss or gain relates to the $399,774 loan from SY Corporation Co., Ltd., formerly known as Samyang Optics Co. Ltd. (“SY Corporation”), made in June 2012, which is a significant health care problem that grows as the elderly population continues to increase. Dementia can be diagnosed in those individuals who develop persistent memory and cognitive deficits as well as in those individuals who suffer from difficulties in their social, occupational and other activities of daily living. With advanced dementia, many elderly individuals become confined to nursing homes because of psychological disorientation and profound functional difficulties. Pharmaceuticals used to alleviate deficits in memory and cognition could potentially enable elderly individuals with dementia to regain some functional abilities that may help them remain independent longer, which may result in an improved quality of life and substantial savings in health care costs.

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common form of dementia, currently afflicting approximately four million peopledenominated in the U.S. and 12 million people worldwide. UnlessSouth Korean Won.

Net Loss. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease is found, the numbernet loss of people in the U.S. with the disease is expected$2,115,033, as compared to reach 14 million by the middlea net loss of this century. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, the U.S. spends at least $100 billion a year on costs associated with Alzheimer’s disease, at an average lifetime cost per patient of $174,000. Medicare and most private health insurance will not cover all costs associated with the long-term care of an Alzheimer’s patient. Accordingly, an effective treatment, even a symptomatic one, likely will have an enormous impact.

We believe that during the early to middle stages of Alzheimer’s disease AMPAKINE molecules may play a valuable role in enhancing the effectiveness of the brain cells and brain circuits that have not yet succumbed to the disease. The enhancement AMPAKINE molecules may provide may help to alleviate the memory and cognitive deficits that constitute the major symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease.

There is also a possibility that treatment with high impact AMPAKINE compounds may slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain cells, or neurons, require continued input from other brain cells to remain alive. As neurons die, other neurons begin to lose their inputs, hastening their own death. AMPAKINE compounds may slow the rate at which functional levels of input from other neurons are lost. In animal models, selected AMPAKINE compounds have been shown to increase the production of BDNF, which is a protein associated with the formation of synapses by neurons. This possible mode of action may also prove beneficial to patients with Alzheimer’s disease, although it has not been demonstrated whether the same mechanism may produce similar results in humans.

Patients with MCI represent the earliest clinically-defined group that have memory impairment beyond the level expected for “normal” individuals of the same age and education, but do not meet the clinical criteria for Alzheimer’s disease.

It is estimated that there are between three and four million people with MCI. The memory deficits in the MCI population are clinically discernible and can interfere with daily functioning. MCI patients also appear to have a greatly increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease; whereas approximately one to two percent of the normal elderly population will be diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease every year, 10-15% or more of MCI patients will progress to Alzheimer’s disease per year.

Given the lack of consensus by the FDA on the diagnostic and outcome for success in MCI, we believe that the AMPAKINE compounds must first demonstrate efficacy in treating Alzheimer’s disease before undertaking studies to determine the efficacy of the compounds in MCI. Yet, given the potential size of the MCI market, we remain interested in this indication.

Under the agreements that we signed with Servier in October 2000, as amended to date, the collaborative research phase of the agreement ended in December 2006. As a result of this termination, we regained the worldwide rights$2,591,790 for the use of AMPAKINE compounds for treatment of (i) declines in cognitive performance associated with aging, (ii) neurodegenerative disorders and (iii) anxiety disorders. Servier subsequently selected three AMPAKINE compounds for potential development and commercialization. In November 2010, Servier selected a jointly discovered high impact AMPAKINE compound to advance into Phase I clinical testing. Should the compound be successfully commercialized by Servier, the Company would receive payments based upon key clinical development milestones and royalty payments on sales in licensed territories.

Depression

It is estimated that major depression affects over 18.8 million people in the U.S. and over 121 million people worldwide, with approximately 20% of the global population at risk of developing major depression at some point in their lives. Women are almost twice as likely to suffer from depression as men (9.5% versus 5.8%), but prevalence figures vary from country to country. Depression costs the U.S. an estimated $44 billion each year. The World Health Organization predicts depression will become the leading cause of disability by the year 2020.

In the U.S., the depression market is considered the largest segment of the central nervous system market with global sales in excess of $20 billion in 2008. This is a mature market with a number of the leading brands facing patent expiration in the next five to six years.

The primary drug therapy for depression is the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, such as Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Celexa and Lexapro. In addition, dual reuptake inhibitors that also affect norepinephrine, or SNRIs, such as Cymbalta and Effexor, are also commonly prescribed. However, these antidepressant molecules only work for 30% to 45% of the depressed population, and all antidepressants acting via the monoaminergic pathways have received a black box warning from the FDA for suicidality. There is much room for improvement in developing new antidepressants, such as improved efficacy, a faster onset of action (current treatments require 4-6 weeks to see efficacy), and fewer side effects (current treatments produce sexual dysfunction, weight gain, gastrointestinal and sleep disturbances).

Animal studies have demonstrated antidepressant effects of AMPAKINE molecules. For example, AMPAKINE molecules have demonstrated efficacy comparable to that of SSRI and tricyclic antidepressants in the forced swim and tail suspension tests, both models of “behavioral despair.” AMPAKINE compounds also produced synergistic effects when combined with clinically effective antidepressants. In the mouse forced swim test, an ineffective dose of the AMPAKINE significantly augmented the potency of several other antidepressant compounds. These observations of synergy are consistent with the idea that AMPAKINE molecules produce their antidepressant-like effects through a mechanism that, although distinct, ultimately converges upon a common final pathway.

Although the SSRIs and SNRIs are widely used today, there is clearly room in the market for new therapies that act via different mechanisms that may address treatment-resistant patients, have a faster onset of action, and do not have the same side-effect profiles.

Schizophrenia

The worldwide incidence of schizophrenia is approximately one percent of the population, regardless of ethnic, cultural or socioeconomic status. Schizophrenia typically develops in late adolescence or early adulthood and involves a collection of symptoms. These are generally characterized as positive symptoms (delusions and hallucinations), negative symptoms (social withdrawal and loss of emotional responsiveness) and cognitive symptoms (disordered thought and attention deficits).

The first conventional anti-psychotics for schizophrenia were developed in the 1950s and 1960s. These drugs helped to reduce the positive symptoms of the disease and greatly reduced the need for chronic hospitalization but can be difficult to use because of safety and tolerability issues. Newer agents achieve good control of positive symptoms, partial control of negative symptoms and better patient compliance with medication due to lower frequency of side effects. However, clinicians agree that there are still substantial side effects and that the cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia are not greatly improved by any available agent. The persistence of cognitive symptoms prevents many patients from successfully reintegrating into society.

Schizophrenia has long been thought to have its biochemical basis in an over-activity of dopamine pathways projecting into an area of the brain known as the striatum. More recently, a developing body of evidence suggests that schizophrenia also involves reduced activity of glutamate pathways projecting into the same area. We began studying whether AMPAKINE compounds, which increase current flow through the AMPA subtype of glutamate receptor, might have relevance to the treatment of schizophrenia.

In animal models where cognitive function is impaired by agents known to produce schizophrenia-like symptoms in humans, AMPAKINE compounds restore cognitive deficits, suggesting that in schizophrenia patients AMPAKINE compounds may improve the cognitive deficits when combined with current antipsychotic therapies.

Sleep Apnea

Sleep apnea is a serious disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops long enough to disrupt sleep, and temporarily decrease the amount of oxygen and increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the blood. Sleep apnea is defined by more than five periods per hour of ten seconds or longer without breathing. The most common type of sleep apnea is obstructive sleep apnea, which occurs by repetitive narrowing or collapse of the pharyngeal airway during sleep. Central sleep apnea, a much rarer type, is caused by a problem with the control of breathing in the brain (which is accomplished in the brain stem). Mixed sleep apnea, the third type, is a combination of central and obstructive factors occurring in the same episode of sleep apnea. Sleep apnea is often made worse by central nervous system depressants such as alcohol and opioid analgesics.

The repetitive cessation of breathing during sleep has substantial impact on the affected individuals. The disorder is associated with major co-morbidities including excessive daytime sleepiness and increased risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and weight gain. It is therefore important for these patients to seek therapy. However, there is currently no approved pharmacotherapy, and the most common treatment is to use continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, delivered via a nasal or full-face mask, as long as patients are able to tolerate the treatment. It is estimated that in more than 50% of cases, patients stop using the CPAP device on a regular basis. Given the large patient population of greater than 17 million in the U.S. alone, and a lack of suitable treatment options, there is a very large opportunity for pharmacotherapy to treat this disorder.

In 2009, we initiated a pilot clinical study in patients previously diagnosed with sleep apnea to evaluate the ability of CX1739 to reduce the number of apnea events and improve blood oxygen saturation. Due to our financial constraints, enrollment in the study was slower than expected. We recently completed testing in the sleep apnea trial and are currently analyzing the related results.

Other Indications

We may conduct studies in various other indications that have not been discussed above. In recent years, we have developed a number of new patent applications for new composition of matter patents for both high and low impact compounds. If these applications are granted, they will provide patent protection for our new AMPAKINE molecules through 2028.

Manufacturing

We have no experience or capability to either manufacture bulk quantities of the new compounds that we develop, or to produce finished dosage forms of the compounds, such as tablets or capsules. We rely, and presently intend to rely, on the manufacturing and quality control expertise of contract manufacturing organizations or current and prospective corporate partners. There is no assurance that we will be able to enter into manufacturing arrangements to produce bulk quantities of our compounds on favorable financial terms. There is, however, substantial availability of both bulk chemical manufacturing and dosage form manufacturing capability in the U.S. and international pharmaceutical industry that we believe that we can readily access.

Marketing

We have no experience in the marketing of pharmaceutical products and do not anticipate having the resources to distribute and broadly market any products that we may develop for indications such as Alzheimer’s disease and ADHD. We will therefore continue to seek commercial development arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies for our proposed products for those indications that require significant sales forces to effectively market. In entering into such arrangements, we may seek to retain the right to promote or co-promote products for certain of the Orphan Drug indications in North America. We believe that there is a significant expertise base for such marketing and sales functions within the pharmaceutical industry and expect that we could recruit such expertise if we pursue to directly market a drug. With respect to Orphan Drugs, we may distribute and market such products directly.

As noted under the caption “Risk Related to Our Business” under the “Risk Factors” section, we are at an early stage of development and we may not be able to successfully develop and commercialize our products and technologies, and there are certain risks related to the development and commercialization of our products.

Technology Rights

In 1993, we entered into an agreement with the Regents of the University of California, or the University, under which we secured exclusive commercial rights to AMPA-receptor modulating technology and compounds (the AMPAKINE technology) for the treatment of deficits of memory and cognition. The relationship later was expanded to include additional agreements for other indications. We paid an initial license fee and are obligated to make additional payments, including license maintenance fees and patent expense reimbursements creditable against future royalties, over the course of initiating and conducting human clinical testing and obtaining regulatory approvals. When and if sales of licensed products commence, we will pay royalties on net sales. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, we amended the agreement with the University to exclude the treatment of disease areas outside of the central nervous system that we would not have the resources or the capability to develop in a timely manner. Additionally, in connection with our March 2010 transaction with Biovail, with our consent, the University and Biovail entered an agreement to provide Biovail with non-exclusive commercial rights to the AMPAKINE technology for use for the treatment of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. As a result of our transaction with Biovail, we incurred certain license fees payable to the University. Of the patents licensed from the University, the date for the last to expire issued patent is January 2025.December 31, 2018.

As noted under the caption “Risk Related to Our Business” under the “Risk Factors” section, our products rely on licenses from research institutions, and if we lose access to these technologies, our business would be substantially impaired.

Patents and Proprietary Rights

We are aggressively pursuing patent protection of our technologies. We own or have exclusive rights (within our areas of product development) to more than 25 patent families comprising over 250 issued or allowed U.S. and foreign patents and over 200 additional U.S. patent applications and their international counterparts pending. These patents form the foundation of our business and the pharmaceutical industry in general. Additionally, we are consistently filing new disclosures and patents for new structures and new uses, and in 2008 we filed new patent applications covering hundreds of new compounds. If these applications are granted as filed, they will provide patent protection for our new molecules through 2028.

One of our licensed patents covers the method of use for our AMPAKINE compounds — as well as compounds made by others — and describes the mechanism by which AMPAKINE compounds may affect the treatment of memory and cognition. This patent was issued to the University in the U.S. in 1999, and provides protection through 2016. We believe that this patent provides coverage in the U.S. that extends to both neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease as well as psychiatric conditions with cognitive disturbances including depression, obsessive compulsive disorder and phobic disorders. Similar method of use patents have been issued in Mexico, Australia and New Zealand and we have licenses to such patents.

In November 2003, a similar patent, licensed by us, was issued to the University by the European Patent Office, or the EPO, that provides protection through 2013. Upon issuance of the patent, an opposition was filed by Eli Lilly and Company and in August 2004, an opposition also was filed by GlaxoSmithKline. In cooperation with the University, we responded to the oppositions. At an oral hearing in January 2008, the EPO decided to revoke this patent. One of the reasons cited for the revocation was a filing technicality related to matter added to the original patent application. The EPO decided that the parent application as filed did not provide sufficient basis for several terms that appeared in the final claims of the patent. We have subsequently filed a formal appeal of the EPO’s decision. The revocation decision does not take effect until any appeal is concluded, and that process may take several years to resolve.

Another method of use patent licensed by us contains a broad claim for any AMPA-modulating compound to treat schizophrenia. This patent was issued to the University in the U.S. in 1998, and subsequently has been issued in Australia. An additional method of use patent containing a broad claim for any AMPA-modulating compounds combined with antipsychotic medications to treat schizophrenia has issued in Europe. However, in December 2006 we were notified by the EPO that oppositions to this patent were filed by Eli Lilly and Company and another by GlaxoSmithKline. In April 2007, we submitted our written response to the EPO to counter these objections. An oral hearing was held in October 2008. The EPO ruled in our favor, to maintain the claims of the patent. However, both opponents filed a formal appeal to the EPO’s decision. The patent remains enforced throughout the appeal process, and would continue to provide protection through 2018, unless during the appeal process, the patent is overturned.

For both patent appeals, there are no timeframes available for a decision from the EPO. As a result, the process to determine whether the oppositions filed for this patent will or will not prevail in Europe may take several years to resolve. The legal process may continue for most of the remaining life of the earlier patent, given that the European patent expires in 2013. We do not believe that the European decisions for either patent are material to the future of our AMPAKINE technology given these patents’ limited life for commercial protection.

Most importantly, we own or have exclusive rights to a large portfolio of composition of matter patents or pending patent applications with much longer patent lives that we believe are fundamental to pharmaceuticals in general and more critical to our commercial protection worldwide. AMPAKINE CX717 was acquired by Biovail in our March 2010 transaction, along with certain rights to CX1739. Specifically, Biovail’s rights to CX1739 are limited to an intravenous dosage form to treat respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. The structure of the transaction with Biovail permits us to pursue the development of CX1739 as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders, ADHD and other indications. CX1739 is included in composition of matter claims in pending applications filed in the U.S. and worldwide. If issued, this patent family would expire in May 2028.

CX2007 and CX2076, part of a chemically distinct series of low impact AMPAKINE compounds, are included in other patent applications filed in the U.S. and worldwide. If issued, this patent family would expire in August 2028.

Similarly, our high impact AMPAKINE, CX929, is included in a composition of matter patent issued in the U.S. and in pending applications filed worldwide. The patent issued in the U.S. and the patents for the worldwide applications, if issued, would expire in November 2022.

Furthermore, because patent rules and regulations, and burden of proof requirements differ substantially between the U.S. and Europe, specifically in regards to the revocation reason cited by the EPO above, we believe that the decision by the EPO is not likely to impact the patents that have issued in the U.S.

Our rights under the University patents are contingent upon us making certain minimum annual payments to the University, meeting certain milestones and diligently seeking to commercialize the underlying technology. Over the past five years, we believe that we have demonstrated such diligence.

Since issuance of a patent does not guarantee the right to practice the claimed invention, others may obtain patents that we would then need to license or design around in order to practice our patented technologies. We may not be able to obtain licenses that might be required to practice these technologies due to patents of others on reasonable terms or at all. Additionally, any unpatented manufacture, use or sale of our technology, processes or products may infringe on patents or proprietary rights of others, and we may be unable to obtain licenses or other rights to these other technologies that may be required for commercialization of our proposed products or processes.

Also, we rely to a certain extent upon unpatented proprietary technology and may determine in some cases that our interests would be better served by reliance on trade secrets or confidentiality agreements rather than patents.

As noted under the caption “Risk Related to Our Industry” under the “Risk Factors” section, if we fail to secure adequate intellectual property protection, it could significantly harm our financial results and ability to compete.

Government Regulation

In order to test, produce and market human therapeutic products in the U.S., mandatory procedures and safety standards established by the FDA must be satisfied. Obtaining FDA approval is a costly and time-consuming process. We have initiated Phase I and early Phase II testing in the U.S. and Europe. Some clinical trials were and are performed in the U.S. under Notices of Claimed Investigational Exemption for a New Drug, or IND, filed with the FDA by our clinical collaborators. We plan to file an IND for CX1739. It is our intent that Servier, Biovail or another pharmaceutical company partner or partners that we are seeking, will pursue other required regulatory approvals to conduct further clinical testing with AMPAKINE compounds. However, we intend to file other IND’s (and equivalent regulatory filings outside of the U.S.) for additional AMPAKINE compounds to facilitate the development of our Orphan Drug strategy.

Clinical trials are normally conducted in three phases. Phase I trials are concerned primarily with safety of the drug, involve fewer than 100 subjects, and may take from six months to over a year. Phase II trials normally involve a few hundred patients. Phase II trials are designed to demonstrate effectiveness and to determine optimal dosing in treating or diagnosing the disease or condition for which the drug is intended. Short-term side effects and risks in people whose health is impaired also may be examined. Phase III trials may involve up to several thousand patients who have the disease or condition for which the drug is intended, to approximate more closely the conditions of ordinary medical practice. Phase III trials also are designed to clarify the drug’s benefit-risk relationship, to uncover less common side effects and adverse reactions, and to generate information for proper labeling of the drug. The FDA receives reports on the progress of each phase of clinical testing, and may require the modification, suspension, or termination of clinical trials if an unwarranted risk is presented to patients. The FDA estimates that the clinical trial period of drug development can take up to ten years, and typically averages six years. With certain exceptions, once clinical testing is completed, the sponsor can submit a New Drug Application for approval to market a drug. The FDA’s review of a New Drug Application can also be lengthy.

Therapeutic products that may be developed and sold by us outside the U.S. will be subject to regulation by the various countries in which they are to be distributed. In addition, products manufactured in the U.S. that have not yet been cleared for domestic distribution will require FDA approval in order to be exported to foreign countries for distribution there. Also, as noted under the caption “Risk Related to Our Industry” under the “Risk Factors” section, the regulatory approval process is expensive, time consuming, uncertain and may prevent us from obtaining required approvals for the commercialization of some of our products.

We plan to seek additional financing to support our development of selected AMPAKINE compounds for Orphan Drug indications. Without such financing, we may be severely restricted in our overall development. We would be dependent upon our sub-licensees and might be unable to maintain our current core technical and management capabilities. Under such circumstances, we would be dependent upon entering into partnerships or other collaborative arrangements with third parties with the required resources to obtain the needed approvals. Along with our agreements with Servier and Biovail, we intend to enter into license or other arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies under which those companies would conduct the required clinical trials and seek FDA approval for most or all of our proposed products. As noted under the caption “Risks Related to Our Business” under the “Risk Factors” section, there are certain risks related to the proposed strategic alliances we are seeking, as we may not be able to enter into the strategic alliances necessary to fully develop and commercialize our products and technologies, and we will be dependent on our corporate partners if we do.

Competition

The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapidly evolving technology and intense competition. Many companies of all sizes, including both major pharmaceutical companies and specialized biotechnology companies, are engaged in activities similar to ours. A large number of drugs intended for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, MCI, schizophrenia, depression, ADHD and other neurological and psychiatric diseases and disorders are on the market or in the later stages of clinical testing. For example, approximately 15 drugs are in development in the U.S. for schizophrenia and over 25 drugs are under clinical investigation in the U.S. for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Most of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources and larger research and development staffs. Larger pharmaceutical company competitors also have significant experience in preclinical testing, human clinical trials and regulatory approval procedures.

In addition, colleges, universities, governmental agencies and other public and private research organizations will continue to conduct research. These institutions are becoming more active in seeking patent protection and licensing arrangements to collect license fees, milestone payments and royalties in exchange for license rights to technology that they have developed, some of which may be directly competitive with us.

We expect technological developments in the neuropharmacology field to continue to occur at a rapid rate and expect that competition will remain intense as those advances continue. Based on the technical qualifications, expertise and reputations of our Scientific Directors, consultants and other key scientists, we believe that our operating strategy to develop AMPAKINE compounds for the treatment of selected Orphan Drug indications and to out-license the technology to larger pharmaceutical companies for major chronic indications is appropriate.

Product Liability Insurance

The clinical testing, manufacturing and marketing of our products may expose us to product liability claims, against which we maintain liability insurance. As noted under the caption “Risks Related to Our Industry” of the “Risk Factors” section, there are certain risks to us related to product liability claims that may be brought against us.

Employees

We currently have 11 full-time employees, including five Ph.D.-level or equivalent employees. Of the full-time employees, seven are engaged in management and administrative support and the remainder is engaged in research and development.

We do not anticipate significant increases in our employee levels during the next twelve months. We will continue to outsource a substantial amount of our development activities to qualified vendors.

Legal Proceedings

Currently,

By letter dated February 5, 2016, the Company received a demand from a law firm representing Salamandra, LLC (“Salamandra”) alleging $146,082 due and owing for unpaid services rendered. On January 18, 2017, following an arbitration proceeding in the Superior Court of New Jersey, an arbitrator awarded Salamandra the full amount sought. Additionally, the arbitrator granted Salamandra’s attorneys’ fees and costs of $47,937. All such amounts have been accrued at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, including accrued interest at 4.5% annually from February 26, 2018, the date of the judgment, through June 30, 2020, totaling $20,736.

On December 16, 2019, the Company and Salamandra entered into an amendment to the settlement agreement and release, executed August 21, 2019 (the “Original Settlement Agreement” and as amended, the “Amended Settlement Agreement”) regarding $202,395 owed by the Company to Salamandra (as reduced by any further payments by the Company to Salamandra, the “Full Amount”) in connection with the arbitration award previously granted in favor of Salamandra. Under the terms of the Original Settlement Agreement, the Company was to pay Salamandra $125,000 on or before November 30, 2019 in full satisfaction of the Full Amount owed, subject to conditions regarding the Company’s ability to raise certain dollar amounts of working capital. Under the Amended Settlement Agreement, (i) the Company was to pay and the Company paid to Salamandra $25,000 on or before December 21, 2019, (ii) upon such payment, Salamandra ceased all collection efforts against the Company until March 31, 2020 (the “Threshold Date”), and (iii) the Company was to pay to Salamandra $100,000 on or before the Threshold Date if the Company had at that time raised $600,000 in working capital. Such payments by the Company would have constituted satisfaction of the Full Amount owed and would have served as consideration for the dismissal of the action underlying the arbitration award and the mutual releases set forth in the Amended Settlement Agreement. If the Company had raised less than $600,000 in working capital before the Threshold Date, the Company was to pay to Salamandra an amount equal to 21% of the working capital amount raised, in which case such payment would have reduced the Full Amount owed on a dollar-for-dollar basis, and Salamandra would then have been able to seek collection on the remainder of the debt. The Company made the initial payment of $25,000 in December 2019, but did not make the subsequent required payment on March 31, 2020, nor has any payment been made during the three-months ended June 30, 2020. The Company has initiated further discussions with the intent of reaching a revised settlement agreement which cannot be assured.

By email dated July 21, 2016, the Company received a demand from an investment banking consulting firm that represented the Company in 2012 in conjunction with the Pier transaction alleging that $225,000 is due and payable for investment banking services rendered. Such amount has been included in accrued expenses at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

On February 21, 2020, Sharp Clinical Services, Inc. ("Sharp"), a vendor of the Company, filed a complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Bergen County related to a December 16, 2019 demand for payment of past due invoices inclusive of late fees totaling $103,890 of which $3,631 relates to late fees, seeking $100,259 plus 1.5% interest per month on outstanding unpaid invoices. Amid settlement discussions, the vendor stated on March 13, 2020 its intent to proceed to a default judgment against the Company, and the Company stated on March 14, 2020 its intent to continue settlement discussions. On May 29, 2020, a default was entered against the Company, and on September 4, 2020, a final judgment by default was entered against the Company in the amount of $104,217.37.

The Company is periodically the subject of various pending and threatened legal actions and claims. In the opinion of management of the Company, adequate provision has been made in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 with respect to such matters, including, specifically, the matters noted above. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself if any of the matters described above results in the filing of a lawsuit or formal claim.

43

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The mission of the Company is to develop innovative and revolutionary treatments to combat diseases caused by disruption of neuronal signaling. We are developing treatment options that address conditions affecting millions of people, but for which there are few or poor treatment options, including OSA, ADHD, epilepsy, chronic pain and recovery from SCI. The Company is developing a pipeline of new drug product candidates based on our broad patent portfolios for two drug platforms: (i) pharmaceutical cannabinoids, which include dronabinol, a synthetic form of THC that acts upon the nervous system’s endogenous cannabinoid receptors and (ii) neuromodulators, which include ampakines and GABAkines, proprietary compounds that, as PAMs, positively modulate AMPA-type glutamate receptors and GABAAreceptors, respectively. Due to insufficient funding, we do not currently have any active clinical trials and only limited operations.

Product Development Plans

In order to facilitate our business activities and product development, we are organizing our drug platforms into two separate business units. The business unit focused on pharmaceutical cannabinoids is named ResolutionRx and the business unit focused on neuromodulators is named EndeavourRx. It is anticipated that the Company will use, at least initially, its management personnel to provide management, operational and oversight services to these two business units. Below is a description of the Company’s product development plans within these business units. Please see the section titled “The Business of the Company” in this prospectus for background information on these business units.

ResolutionRx – Dronabinol program

For the dronabinol program within our ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform, the Company plans to manufacture, on a pilot scale, one or more new proprietary formulations of dronabinol with the enhanced properties described in our patent applications, for which we plan to spend approximately $150,000 to bench test in vitro several versions of dronabinol formulations in order to determine those with the best physico-chemical properties. To finance these efforts, the Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” of this prospectus for more information.

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company intends to spend approximately $450,000 to $600,000 of these funds on the continued development of a proprietary formulation of dronabinol. This development would include (i) improvements to the Company’s intellectual property position, (ii) improvements to our dronabinol formulation’s PK profile, (iii) improvements to regulatory compliance, and (iv) expenditures for the initial stocking of clinical supply, packaging and distribution in anticipation of a Phase 2 PK/PD clinical trial and a pivotal Phase 3 clinical study. The performance of the Phase 2 PK/PD clinical trial and Phase 3 clinical study, however, would need yet additional funds either from separate financings or a collaboration with a strategic partner.

EndeavourRx – AMPAkines program

For the AMPAkines program within our EndeavourRx neuromodulators platform, the Company plans to initiate clinical testing of our AMPAkines in the treatment of SCI. To this end, approximately $145,000 would be utilized to assess the purity of our existing drug supplies and finalize a clinical trial protocol for a Phase 2A clinical trial to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic (“PK”) properties of one of our lead AMPAkines in patients who have had SCI. These tasks are critical for applying to the FDA for permission to amend our existing IND or initiate a new IND enabling the commencement of clinical trials. To finance these efforts, the Company intends to use the estimated net proceeds to it from exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement related to the 115,000,000 shares registered hereby. See the section titled “Use of Proceeds” of this prospectus for more information.

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company would continue to focus on SCI, as we believe it would be the most efficient expenditure of our resources and yield an actionable result in the shortest period of time. Expenditures would include: (i) an estimated spend of $200,000 for chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) efforts, depending on the assessment of our drug supplies, (ii) an estimated spend of $400,000 on an initial Phase 2A single ascending dose safety and PK and pharmacodynamic (“PD”) study in human SCI patients, (iii) an estimated spend of $600,000 on a Phase 2A multiple ascending dose safety and PK and PD study in SCI patients, and (iv) an estimated spend of $650,000 on a Phase 2B efficacy study in SCI patients. Our anticipated spend for ADHD would be approximately $100,000 with the larger spends occurring later dependent upon availability of financing.

EndeavourRx – GABAkines program

Assuming financing is obtained in addition to the net proceeds from the Company’s exercise of its put right under the Purchase Agreement, the Company plans to finance efforts with respect to the GABAkines program within our EndeavourRx neuromodulators platform. These efforts would be in preparation of an IND to be submitted to the FDA to commence human studies of KRM-II-81, our lead GABAkine drug candidate, for treatment-resistant epilepsy, and expenditures would include (i) an estimated spend of $530,000 for CMC efforts, (ii) an estimated spend of $450,000 for pre-clinical pharmacology, safety and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (“ADME”) studies, (iii) an estimated spend of $225,000 for animal safety studies and (iv) an estimated spend of $65,000 for regulatory consultants.

In connection with the organization and development of the ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx business units, we are planning certain corporate and development actions as summarized below. All of the below are subject to raising additional financing and/or entering into strategic relationships, of which no legal proceedingsassurance can be given.

Proposed Creation of Subsidiaries

Pending approval by the Board, management intends to organize our ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx business units into two subsidiaries: (i) a ResolutionRx subsidiary, into which we intend to contribute our pharmaceutical cannabinoid platform and its related tangible and intangible assets and certain of its liabilities and (ii) an EndeavourRx subsidiary, into which we plan to contribute our neuromodulator platform, including both the AMPAkine and GABAkine programs and their related tangible and intangible assets and certain of their liabilities.

Management believes that there are several advantages to separating these platforms formally into newly formed subsidiaries, including but not limited to optimizing their asset values through separate finance channels and making them more attractive for capital raising as well as for strategic deal making.

Employee/Consultant Infrastructure Build-out

In order to broaden our operational expertise, we are planning to hire a number of highly qualified individuals, either as employees or claims are pending against or involve us.

consultants and, in tandem, increase our administrative support function.

Our relationship with Drs. Cook and Witkin has been highly cooperative to date. Our intent is to contractually formalize these relationships as consultants to the Company.

MANAGEMENTKey contracts

Directors

The Purisys Agreement and the UIC License Agreement will need to be transferred or otherwise made available to the ResolutionRx subsidiary. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Manufacturing” and “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Technology Rights—University of Illinois License Agreement” for more information on these agreements. While this subsidiary’s initial, primary focus will be on repurposing dronabinol for the treatment of OSA, we believe that our broad enabling patents and a new proprietary formulation may provide a framework for expanding into the larger burgeoning pharmaceutical cannabinoid industry. We believe that by creating this subsidiary, it may be possible, through separate finance channels and potential strategic transactions, to optimize the asset value not only of the ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform, but our EndeavourRx neuromodulator platform as well.

Prospective Investors

We have had discussions with a number of potential cannabinoid investors and strategic partners who have expressed interest, mostly in the development of a new, proprietary formulation with extended patent life. Forming a new subsidiary for our cannabinoid platform or our neuromodulator platform may allow us to attract financing from investors with a desire to invest in one platform but not the other.

Intellectual Property

The Company has exclusive rights to issued and pending patents claiming cannabinoid compositions and methods for treating cannabinoid-sensitive disorders, including sleep apnea, pain, glaucoma, muscular spasticity, anorexia and other conditions. In October 2019, we filed a continuation-in-part for our pending patent that describes and claims novel doses, controlled release compositions and methods of use for cannabinoids, as well as a new U.S. provisional patent application further disclosing novel dosage and controlled release compositions and methods of use for cannabinoids, alone or in combination, including with cannabinoid and non-cannabinoid molecules. Specific claims describe low dosage strengths and controlled release formulations for attaining a therapeutic window of cannabinoid blood levels that produce the desired therapeutic effects for a controlled period of time, while minimizing undesirable side effects. As previously disclosed, the original patents were filed by the Company and are now included in the UIC License Agreement. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Technology Rights—University of Illinois License Agreement” for more information on the UIC License Agreement. While no assurance can be provided that the claims in this continuation-in-part or the U.S. provisional patent application will be allowed in whole or in part, or that the patents will ultimately issue, we believe that these new filings, if allowed, will provide market protections through at least 2031.

We believe our intellectual property initiatives may afford expanding strategic options and market exclusivity in the burgeoning pharmaceutical cannabinoid business sector. New cannabinoid formulation technology is headed in the direction of enhanced absorption. These technologies, including nano- and micro-emulsions and thin films, have been shown to bypass the normal route of absorption and liver metabolism of cannabinoids, thus dramatically increasing blood levels and allowing for the use of low doses. Similarly, technologies may be used to achieve a controlled release of dronabinol, and we believe that our pending patent priority relating back to 2010 predates the efforts of others seeking to develop low-dose or extended release formulations of cannabinoids. Thus, to the extent that new technologies result in lower doses and/or controlled release formulations, we believe they would infringe on our pending patents once issued, not only for use in the treatment of OSA but potentially a wide variety of other indications as well.

Data from our Phase 2 clinical trials has allowed us to design new proprietary formulations of dronabinol, disclosed in our patent filings and optimized for the treatment of not only OSA, but also other indications. Within the past 12 to 24 months, new formulation technology has emerged potentially allowing for the creation of a proprietary dronabinol formulation with optimized dose and duration of action for treating OSA. We have discussions in progress with a number of companies that have existing cannabinoid formulation technologies, expertise, and licensure capabilities, which may lead to the development of a proprietary formulation of dronabinol for the Company based on our pending patents for low-dose and extended release dronabinol and may lead to the development of a marketable proprietary formulation of dronabinol. We believe that the development of a novel, proprietary formulation of dronabinol would only extend time to market entry by approximately 12 months compared to the currently available generic soft gel capsules, but would dramatically extend market exclusivity; however, no assurance can be provided that any of the formulation technologies that we are currently analyzing will result in viable products or that formulation agreements will be consummated on terms acceptable to us. The failure to consummate a formulation agreement would materially and adversely affect the Company.

The Opportunity to Improve Dronabinol Formulations

Dronabinol is currently marketed as a soft gelatin capsule that suffers from several major deficiencies.

First, dronabinol exhibits poor and erratic absorption. Δ9-THC is not water soluble. The market dominant commercial gelcap dronabinol is currently formulated as a sesame oil-based liquid within a soft gelatin capsule. The absorption of dronabinol after oral administration is poor and highly variable with some patients achieving very high levels and others achieving very low levels. This erratic absorption may be responsible for the variable therapeutic responses observed in dronabinol clinical trials. Syndros®, on the other hand, is formulated as a solution in dehydrated alcohol, polyethylene glycol and other materials and exhibits its own challenges and deficiencies, including but not limited to it being Schedule II as compared to the capsule that is Schedule III.

Second, dronabinol is rapidly and extensively (approximately 80%) metabolized upon first pass through the liver, resulting in low blood levels. Additionally, dronabinol has a relatively short half-life (approximately 3 – 4 hours) and, in its present formulation, is not optimally suited for therapeutic indications requiring blood levels to be sustained for 6 hours or longer.

Third, in order to achieve sustained, therapeutic blood levels, we have found it necessary to use higher doses of dronabinol in our OSA clinical trials. For example, over an 8-hour period, the 2.5 mg and 10 mg doses produced therapeutically equivalent effects during the first 4 hours, but only the 10 mg dose produced therapeutic effects during the second 4 hours. Unfortunately, the 10 mg dose produces a higher occurrence of side effects than the 2.5 mg dose (as described in the Marinol® package insert). We anticipate focusing on new formulations that would achieve the blood levels produced by the lower doses for a sustained time period, resulting in the desired therapeutic effect(s) while minimizing undesirable side effects.

Large Commercial Opportunity

As a serious public health issue, the important need for diagnosing and ultimately treating OSA has recently been highlighted by the FDA clearance of several sleep apnea home test kits that are now third party reimbursed. Further highlighting this need, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE: CVS) announced the implementation of a program to diagnose and treat OSA initially within their own in-store, walk-in MinuteClinics. If implemented throughout their HealthHUB store network, the number of people diagnosed with sleep apnea and eligible for treatment should increase dramatically. Fitbit (NYSE: FIT), the health oriented smart watch company is seeking clearance from the FDA to diagnose sleep apnea. We believe that the combination of more efficient and patient friendly diagnostic procedures and, ultimately, pharmaceutical treatments such as those we are developing will encourage more patients to seek diagnosis and treatment. As noted above, there are approximately 29 million OSA patients in the United States and an additional 26 million in Germany and 8 million in the United Kingdom. There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of OSA.

As noted below in “—Proposed Regulatory Process,” there are several ways to achieve market exclusivity with respect to this large and underserved patient population.

Proposed Regulatory Process

In conjunction with its management and consultants, the Company intends to file a new NDA under Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (as amended, the “FDCA” and such NDA a “505(b)(2) NDA”), claiming the efficacy and safety of our proposed proprietary dronabinol formulation in the treatment of OSA. We believe the use of dronabinol for the treatment of OSA is a novel indication for an already approved drug, making it eligible for a 505(b)(2) NDA, as opposed to the submission and approval of a full 505(b)(1) NDA.

The names505(b)(2) NDA was created by the Hatch-Waxman Act, as amended (the “Hatch-Waxman Act”), which amended the FDCA to help avoid unnecessary duplication of studies already performed on a previously approved drug. As amended, the FDCA gives the FDA express permission to rely on data not developed by the NDA applicant. Accordingly, a 505(b)(2) NDA contains full safety and effectiveness reports but allows at least some of the information required for NDA approval, such as safety and efficacy information on the active ingredient, to come from studies not conducted by or for the applicant. This can result in a less expensive and faster route to approval, compared with a traditional development path, such as 505(b)(1), while still allowing for the creation of new, differentiated products. The 505(b)(2) NDA regulatory path offers the applicant market protections, such as market exclusivity, under the Hatch-Waxman Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. Other, international regulatory routes are available to pursue proprietary formulations of dronabinol and would provide further market protections. For example, in Europe, a regulatory approval route similar to the 505(b)(2) pathway is the hybrid procedure based on Article 10 of Directive 2001/83/EC.

We have worked with regulatory consultants who will assist with FDA filings and regulatory strategy. If we can secure sufficient financing, of which no assurance can be provided, we anticipate requesting a pre-IND meeting with the FDA. This meeting also could create the type of dialogue with the FDA that is normally communicated at an end-of Phase 2 meeting. The FDA responses to this meeting will be incorporated into an IND.

If we can secure sufficient financing, of which no assurance can be provided, we plan to propose conducting the appropriate clinical studies with our proprietary controlled release formulation in OSA patients to determine safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy, as well as a standard Phase 1 clinical study to determine potential abuse liability. When a Phase 3 study is required for a 505(b)(2), usually only one study with fewer patients is necessary versus the two, large scale, confirmatory studies generally required for the standard 505(b)(1) NDA. While no assurance can be provided, with an extensive safety database tracking chronic, long-term use of Marinol® and generics, we believe that the FDA should not have major safety concerns with dronabinol in the treatment of OSA.

The Company has worked with the investigators who conducted the Phase 2B clinical trial, as well as with our Clinical Advisory Panel to design a draft Phase 3 protocol that, based on the experience and results from the Phase 2A and Phase 2B trials, we believe will provide sufficient data for FDA approval of a RespireRx dronabinol controlled release formulation for OSA. The current version of the protocol is designed as a 90-day randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study of dronabinol in the treatment of OSA. Depending on feedback from the FDA, the Company estimates that the Phase 3 trial would require between 120 and 300 patients at 15 to 20 sites, and take 18 to 24 months to complete, at a cost of between $10 million and $14 million.

We believe our rights under the Purisys Agreement would help facilitate regulatory approval. Under the Purisys Agreement, Purisys has agreed to (i) provide all of the API estimated to be needed for the clinical development process for first- and second-generation products, three validation batches for NDA filings and adequate supply for the initial inventory stocking for the wholesale and retail channels, subject to certain limitations, (ii) maintain or file valid DMFs with the FDA or any other regulatory authority and provide the Company with access or a right of reference letter entitling the Company to make continuing reference to the DMFs during the term of the agreement in connection with any regulatory filings made with the FDA by the Company, (iii) participate on a development committee, and (iv) make available its regulatory consultants, collaborate with any regulatory consulting firms engaged by the Company and participate in all FDA or DEA meetings as appropriate and as related to the API.

In consideration for these supplies and services, the Company has agreed to (i) purchase exclusively from Purisys, during the commercialization phase, all API for these products at a pre-determined price subject to certain producer price adjustments and (ii) allow Purisys’s participation in the economic success of the commercialized products up to the earlier of the achievement of a maximum dollar amount or the expiration of a period of time. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Manufacturing” for information on the Purisys Agreement.

Results of Operations

The Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discussed herein are presented below.

  Six-months ended  Year ended 
  June 30,  

December 31,

 
  2020  2019  2019  2018 
Operating expenses:                
General and administrative $829,019  $594,904  $1,137,175  $1,488,238 
Research and development  308,466   297,350   599,329   688,286 
Total operating expenses  1,137,485   892,254   

1,736,504

   2,176,524 
Loss from operations  (1,137,485)  (892,254)  (1,736,504)  (2,176,524)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other liabilities in exchange for equity  (323,996)  -   -  (166,382)
Interest expense  (331,316)  (151,645)  (404,661)  (136,243)
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)  29,942  26,354   26,132   (112,641)
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(1,762,855) $(1,017,545) $(2,115,033) $(2,591,790)
                 
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.04) $(0.26) $(0.54) $(0.77)
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  49,320,761   3,872,076   3,908,479   3,351,105 

Six-months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

Revenues. The Company had no revenues during the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

General and Administrative. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, general and administrative expenses were $829,019, an increase of $234,115, as compared to $594,904 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the six-months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to an increase in general and administrative salaries of $49,525 with the addition of compensation and benefits for our new Chief Executive Officer and President effective May 6, 2020, an increase general legal fees of $154,326, primarily related to legal fees associated with the April 2020 and June 2020 convertible note financings, the increase in the number of our authorized shares that required the filing of a Form DEF 14C with the Securities and Exchange Commission and a filing with the State of Delaware, and other general matters as well as an increase in patent legal fees of $13,659 and an increase in directors and officers liability insurance and other insurance costs of $10,162, offset by the net effect of increases and decreases in other general and administrative expenses. There was no stock-based compensation in general and administrative expenses for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.

Research and Development. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, research and development expenses were $308,466, an increase of $11,116, as compared to $297,350 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in research and development expenses for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the six-months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily a result of an adjustment to one research contract, an increase in research and development related insurance and the payment of option fee associated with the option agreement related to the UWMRF Patent License Agreement. There was no stock-based compensation in research and development expenses for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.

Interest Expense. During the six-months ended June 30, 2020, interest expense was $331,316 as compared to $151,645 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The increase of $179,671 is primarily the result of interest and amortization of note discounts to interest expense with respect to the convertible notes arising in August, October and November 2019 that were included in the current year three-month period but did not exist in the prior year comparable three-month period.

Foreign Currency Transaction (Loss) Gain. Foreign currency transaction gain was $29,942 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to a foreign currency transaction gain of $26,354 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. The foreign currency transaction (loss) gain relates to the $399,774 loan from SY Corporation made in June 2012, which is denominated in the South Korean Won.

Loss on Extinguishment of Convertible Debt. The loss on extinguishment of convertible debt during the six-months ended June 30, 2020 was $323,996 as compared to $0 in the six-months ended June 30, 2019. On March 21, 2020, the Company entered into exchange agreements with several note holders and exchanged an aggregate of $255,786 of principal and accrued interest for 17,052,424 shares of the Company’s stock with an exchange price of $0.015 per share which was less than the closing price of $0.034 per share. There was no loss on extinguishment of convertible debt during the six-months ended June 30, 2019.

Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, the Company incurred a net loss of $816,137 as compared to a net loss of $477,213 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019. Included in the net loss is a loss on extinguishment of convertible debt of $323,996.

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $1,762,855 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $2,115,033 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 respectively, as well as negative operating cash flows of $106,448 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $487,745 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The Company also had a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,846,748 at June 30, 2020 and expects to continue to incur net losses and negative operating cash flows for at least the next few years. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its audit report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is currently, and has for some time, been in significant financial distress. It has extremely limited cash resources and current assets and has no ongoing source of sustainable revenue. Management is continuing to address various aspects of the Company’s operations and obligations, including, without limitation, debt obligations, financing requirements, establishment of new and maintenance and improvement of existing and in-process intellectual property, licensing agreements, legal and patent matters and regulatory compliance, and has taken steps to continue to raise new debt and equity capital to fund the Company’s business activities from both related and unrelated parties to fund the Company’s business activities.

The Company is continuing its efforts to raise additional capital in order to be able to pay its liabilities and fund its business activities on a going forward basis, including the pursuit of the Company’s planned research and development activities. The Company regularly evaluates various measures to satisfy the Company’s liquidity needs, including development and other agreements with collaborative partners and, when necessary, seeking to exchange or restructure the Company’s outstanding securities. The Company is evaluating certain changes to its operations and structure to facilitate raising capital from sources that may be interested in financing only discrete aspects of the Company’s development programs. Such changes could include a significant reorganization, which may include the formation of one or more subsidiaries into which one or more of our programs may be contributed. As a result of the Company’s current financial situation, the Company has limited access to external sources of debt and equity financing. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to secure additional financing in the amounts necessary to fully fund its operating and debt service requirements. If the Company is unable to access sufficient cash resources, the Company may be forced to discontinue its operations entirely and liquidate.

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

Revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had no revenues.

General and Administrative. For the year ended December 31, 2019, general and administrative expenses were $1,137,175, a decrease of $351,063, as compared to $1,488,238 for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Stock-based compensation costs and fees included in general and administrative expenses were $0 for the December 31, 2019, as compared to $14,248 for the year ended December 31, 2018, reflecting a decrease of $14,248. The decrease is the result of the fact that no stock-based compensation was granted to general and administrative employees of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2019. Salaries and employee benefits included in general and administrative expenses were $439,807 for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to $685,884 for the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease of $246,077. The decrease is primarily due to the full year elimination of the salary and employee benefits of the former Chief Executive Officer and President in the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the elimination of only one quarter of a year of such expenses in the year ended December 31, 2018. Legal fees for general corporate purposes were $213,289 for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to $278,373 for the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease of $65,084. Legal fees for patents and other patent expenses included in general and administrative expenses were $147,722 for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $51,641 as compared to $199,363 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decreases in both general legal fees and legal fees associated with patents and other patent costs is a result of a reduction in utilization of professional resources as part of the Company’s cost control efforts, partially offset by patent legal fees associated with patent filings made in October 2019.

The remaining $25,987 of increases in general and administrative expenses is due to a number of increases partially offset by decreases in a number of other expense categories.

Research and Development. For the year ended December 31, 2019, research and development expenses were $599,329, a decrease of $88,957, as compared to $688,286 for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a decrease in the utilization of consultants and a decrease in research contract expenses.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt and other Liabilities in Exchange for Equity. There was no loss on extinguishment of debt or other liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to a loss of $166,382 for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Interest Expense. During the year ended December 31, 2019, interest expense was $404,661 (including $60,135 to related parties of which $49,863 is to a single vendor that is also a related party representing interest on invoices subject to delayed payment), an increase of $268,418, as compared to $136,243 (including $42,821 to related parties) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in interest expense resulted primarily from interest on five new convertible notes issued from January through March 2019 totaling $110,000 of principal amount in 2019, and five additional new convertible notes issued in April, May, August, October and November 2019 totaling $393,500 of principal and additional interest with respect to the Salamandra legal settlement as well as from a single vendor associated with the delay of cash remittances to that vendor.

Foreign Currency Transaction Loss or Gain. The foreign currency transaction gain was $26,132 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to a foreign currency transaction loss of $112,641 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The foreign currency transaction loss or gain relates to the $399,774 loan from SY Corporation Co., Ltd., formerly known as Samyang Optics Co. Ltd. (“SY Corporation”), made in June 2012, which is denominated in the South Korean Won.

Net Loss. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred a net loss of $2,115,033, as compared to a net loss of $2,591,790 for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

June 30, 2020

Working Capital and Cash. The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $1,762,854 and net losses from operations of $1,137,484 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $2,115,033 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, and negative operating cash flows of $106,448 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $487,745 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, had a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,846,748 at June 30, 2020, and expects to continue to incur net losses and negative operating cash flows for at least the next few years. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had a working capital deficit of $7,846,748, as compared to a working capital deficit of $7,444,819 at December 31, 2019 reflecting an increase in the working capital deficit of $401,929 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020. The increase in the working capital deficit is due to an increase in current liabilities of $442,284 and a decrease in cash of $15,198 offset by an increase in prepaid expenses of $55,553.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had cash aggregating $1,492, as compared to $16,690 at December 31, 2019, reflecting a decrease in cash of $15,198 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020.

The Company is currently, and has for some time, been in significant financial distress. It has extremely limited cash resources and current assets and has no ongoing source of revenue. Management is continuing to address numerous aspects of the Company’s operations and obligations, including, without limitation, debt obligations, financing requirements, intellectual property, licensing agreements, legal and patent matters and regulatory compliance. See Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies and Note 9. Subsequent Events in notes to condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of June 30, 2020 for information on these commitments and obligations.

The Company is continuing its efforts to raise additional capital in order to be able to pay its liabilities and fund its business activities on a going forward basis and regularly evaluates various measures to satisfy the Company’s liquidity needs, including development and other agreements with collaborative partners and seeking to exchange or restructure some of the Company’s outstanding securities. The Company is evaluating certain changes to its operations and structure to facilitate raising capital from sources that may be interested in financing only discrete aspects of the Company’s development programs. Such changes could include a significant reorganization. Though the Company actively pursues opportunities to finance its operations through external sources of debt and equity financing, it has limited access to such financing and there can be no assurance that such financing will be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. See “—Principal Sources of Liquidity” for more information on certain existing and potential financing opportunities.

Operating Activities. For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, operating activities utilized cash of $106,448, as compared to utilizing cash of $266,278 for the six-months ended June 30, 2019, to support the Company’s ongoing general and administrative expenses as well as its research and development activities.

Principal Sources of Liquidity

For the six-months ended June 30, 2020, financing activities consisted of a $1,250 advance from an executive officer, net proceeds of $50,000 after payment of $3,000 of capitalized note costs from the Power Up April 2020 Note financing and net proceeds of $40,000 after payment of $3,000 of capitalized note costs from the Power Up June 2020 Note financing. For the six-months ended June 30, 2019, financing activities consisted of borrowings on convertible notes with warrants of $213,500 less debt issuance costs of $5,500 for net proceeds of $208,000 and the proceeds from a note payable to an officer of $25,000. Financing activities since June 30, 2020 that provided sources of liquidity consisted of net proceeds of $125,000 from the FirstFire SPA, net proceeds of $68,250 from the EMA SPA. See Note 9. Subsequent Events in notes to condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of June 30, 2020 for more information on these financing activities.

The Company intends to continue its efforts to finance its research and development efforts and general and administrative expenses and in doing so, anticipates taking additional steps as necessary to access the full availability of is its equity line under the Purchase Agreement with the Selling Stockholder, which is likely to include the filing of one or more subsequent resale registration statements. No assurance can be provided, however, that the Company will be able to access the full potential gross proceeds under the Purchase Agreement. The Company will also seek financing from the sale of common equity securities, equity-linked securities, convertible debt, preferred stock, convertible preferred stock, debt or other forms of financing, but no assurance can be provided that such financing will be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company or at all.

Additionally, the Company has issued, and may issue in the future, its preferred stock to its executive officers in exchange for the extinguishment of those executive officers’ rights to the payment of certain accrued compensation. See “—Compensation Forgiveness by Arnold S. Lippa and Jeff Margolis and Related Issuance of Series H Preferred Stock” in Note 9. Subsequent Events to notes to condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of June 30, 2020 and “Executive Compensation—Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Transactions with Related Persons” for information on these exchanges.

December 31, 2019

Working Capital and Cash. The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $2,115,033 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and $2,591,790 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, and negative operating cash flows of $487,745 and $427,368 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively. The Company had a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,444,819 at December 31, 2019 and expects to continue to incur net losses and negative operating cash flows for at least the next few years. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, has expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern (see “Going Concern” below).

At December 31, 2019, the Company had a working capital deficit of $7,444,819, as compared to a working capital deficit of $5,736,369 at December 31, 2018, reflecting an increase in the working capital deficit of $1,708,450 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. This increase is comprised of an increase in total current liabilities of $1,632,702, and a decrease in current assets of $78,862. The increase in total current liabilities consists of a net increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $468,910, an increase in accrued compensation and related expenses of $779,407, an increase in convertible notes payable of $311,925, an increase in the note payable to SY Corporation of $21,795, an increase in notes payable to officers and former officers of $54,938 partially offset by a decrease in other short-term notes payable of $4,273. At December 31, 2019, the Company had cash aggregating $16,690 as compared to $33,284 at December 31, 2018, reflecting a decrease in cash of $16,594 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Operating Activities. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, operating activities utilized cash of $487,745 as compared to utilizing cash of $427,368 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, to support the Company’s ongoing operations and research and development activities.

Financing Activities. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, financing activities consisted of ten convertible note financings. In January, February and March 2019, the Company issued new 10% convertible notes, due on either February 28, 2019 or April 30, 2019 with face amounts of $110,000 in the aggregate. Common stock purchase warrants were issued in connection with such notes. The Company valued the warrants and recorded an original issue discount associated with the new 10% convertible notes which was then amortized in its entirety during 2019. On March 22, 2020 the principal and accrued interest related to four of the five notes was exchanged for shares of common stock. In April, May, August, October and November 2019, the Company issued five new convertible notes due on dates ranging from 9 months to 12 months from the issue date. The aggregate amounts payable at maturity of these notes was $393,500. Certain of these notes were partially settled through conversions of portions of the maturity amounts into shares of common stock.

Going Concern. The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $2,115,033 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and $2,591,790 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, and negative operating cash flows of $487,745 and $427,368 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company had a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,444,819 at December 31, 2019 and expects to continue to incur net losses and negative operating cash flows for at least the next few years. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 2020, the Company did not have any transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered off-balance sheet arrangements.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

The Company engaged Haskell & White LLP to audit its 2019 financial statements on January 14, 2020. Since that time, there have been no disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(4) of Regulation S-K) with Haskell & White LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Haskell & White LLP, would have caused Haskell & White LLP to make reference on the subject matter of the disagreements in its reports.

directors and executive officers

The name, age and position of each of our directors and certain biographical information about themexecutive officers as of the date of this prospectus are set forth below:as follows. Each of our directors serves until his or her resignation or until a successor is appointed.

 

Name

  

Age

  

Director
Since

  

Principal Occupation

Robert F. Allnutt(1)(3)  74  1995  Senior Counselor, APCO Worldwide, Inc.
John F. Benedik(2)(3)  62  2005  Retired Senior Partner, Arthur Andersen LLP
Charles J. Casamento(1)(2)  64  1997  Principal and Executive Director, The Sage Group, Inc.
Carl W. Cotman, Ph.D.(4)  70  1991  Professor of Neurology and Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California at Irvine; Co-Founder, Scientific Director and Consultant to the Company
Peter F. Drake, Ph.D.(2)(3)  56  2003  Managing General Partner, Mayflower Partners
M. Ross Johnson, Ph.D.(1) (4)  65  2002  President and Chief Executive Officer, Parion Sciences, Inc.
Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.  68  2002  Executive Chairman of the Company
Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.(4)  44  2007  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Name Age Director Since Position
Arnold S. Lippa 73 2013 Director, Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman of the Board
Timothy Jones 47 2020 Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Jeff E. Margolis 64 2013 Director, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
Kathryn MacFarlane, PharmD 54 2014 Director
Richard Purcell 60 N/A Senior Vice President of Research and Development
David Dickason 57 N/A Senior Vice President Pre-clinical Product Development

 

(1)

Member of Compensation Committee

(2)

Member of Audit Committee

(3)

Member of Governance and Nominations Committee

(4)

Member of Research and Development Committee

Robert F. Allnutt has beenAt September 30, 2020, each of our executive officers except Richard Purcell was also a director since December 1995member of our Board, and each executive officer of the Company serves at the discretion of the Board. See “—Significant Agreements and Contracts—Employment Agreements” in Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies to notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) of the Company as of June 30, 2020 for information on the term of service for each of Dr. Lippa, Mr. Margolis, and Mr. Jones. Mr. Purcell provides his services to the Company on a month-to-month basis through his consulting firm, DNA Healthlink, Inc. for a monthly fee of $12,500. See “Executive Compensation” for information on the compensation of our executive officers for fiscal year 2019.

Arnold S. Lippa, Ph.D. Dr. Lippa is a Senior Managing Director and founder of T Morgen Capital LLC through which he administers his family’s assets. T Morgen Capital LLC is a significant equity owner and managing member of Aurora Capital LLC (“Aurora”), a boutique investment bank and securities firm of which Mr. Margolis is the president and founder, which has served as Chairmana placement agent with respect to certain of the Board from February 1999 untilCompany’s prior financings. Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis jointly manage, since 2004, Atypical BioCapital Management LLC and Atypical BioVentures Fund LLC, a life sciences fund management company and venture fund, respectively. Since 2006, Dr. Lippa has also been the appointment of Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D. in August 2002. Since February 1995, Mr. Allnutt has been a senior counselor for APCO Worldwide, Inc., a public affairs and strategic communications company. Mr. Allnutt was Executive Vice President of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, or PhRMA, from 1985 until 1995 and was Vice President for Governmental Relations of Communications Satellite Corporation from 1984 until 1985. Prior to 1984, Mr. Allnutt held numerous positions in the federal government for over 25 years, including 15 years at National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA, where he attained the position of Associate Deputy Administrator, the third highest ranking position in the agency headquarters. Mr. Allnutt currently serves as Vice ChairChairman of the board of directors of the American Hospice Foundation. He previously servedXintria Pharmaceutical Corporation, a Delaware corporation, as a director of several pharmaceutical-related public and private companies, and of numerous charitable organizations including the National Health Council, the National Council on Aging, the National Medals of Science and Technology Foundation, and the NASA Alumni League. Mr. Allnutt holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and J.D. (with distinction) and L.L.M. degrees from George Washington University.

We believe that Mr. Allnutt’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include valuable business and management insights based on his past experience as a senior staff member of PhRMA, along with his significant experience in both public and private health care organizations and his work within a federal agency at NASA for 15 years. His broad range of experience and knowledge of the U.S. legal environment provides unique expertise and perspectivewell as a member of the Board of Directors. Mr. Allnutt currently serves on both our Compensation Committee and our Governance and Nominations Committee.

John F. Benedik was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Company in December 2005. From 1970 to May 2003, Mr. Benedik worked at Arthur Andersen LLP, where he was admitted to the firm’s partnership in 1980. During his tenure with Arthur Andersen LLP, Mr. Benedik held a number of positions, including Division Head for the Consumer Products and Services audit division of the New York area offices from 1994 to 1998, Managing Partner of the New Jersey office from 1999 to 2002 and Practice Director of the New York area offices from 1998 to 2002. From September 2002 to May 2003, Mr. Benedik was a Managing Director of Arthur Andersen LLP. Mr. Benedik served on theits board of directors and the audit committee of the board of Aeroflex Incorporated, a global provider of high technology solutions to aerospace, defense, cellular and broadband communications markets, from June 2004 until it was acquired in August 2007 by Veritas Capital in a transaction valued at approximately $1.1 billion. He currently serves as a board member and treasurer of the American Conference on Diversity. Mr. Benedik, a retired Certified Public Accountant in New York and New Jersey, received a B.A. in English from Fordham College and an M.B.A from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business with a concentration in accounting.

We believe that Mr. Benedik’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his more than 30-years of experience working as a certified public accountant in the audit division at Arthur Andersen LLP, and his experience as a Managing Director of Arthur Andersen LLP. His experience and insights also help the Company assess risk management and overall financial risks. Mr. Benedik’s financial expertise has proven invaluable to the Company, and he currently serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Governance and Nominations Committee.

Charles J. Casamento has served as a director of the Company since July 1997. Since May 2007, Mr. Casamento has been a Principal and Executive Director of The Sage Group, Inc., a provider of strategic and transactional assistance to healthcare companies in the pharmaceutical, diagnostic, medical device, biotechnology and life science fields. From October 2004 to April 2007, Mr. Casamento was President and Chief Executive Officer of Osteologix, Inc. a publicly held pharmaceutical company that develops products for potential use in treating osteoporosis. From 1999 to August 2004, Mr. Casamento served as Chairman of the board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a publicly held biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Casamento formerly served as RiboGene, Inc.’s Chairman of the board, President and Chief Executive Officer from 1993 through 1999 until it merged with Cypros to form Questcor. He was co-founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, a biopharmaceutical company, from March 1989 until May 1993. Prior to that, Mr. Casamento has held senior management positions at a number of companies, including Senior Vice President, Pharmaceuticals and Strategic Planning for the Critical Care Division of American Hospital Supply; and finance, marketing and business development positions with Johnson & Johnson, Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. and Sandoz Inc. Mr. Casamento currently serves on the board of directors and as Chairman of the audit committee of Supergen, Inc., a publicly held pharmaceutical company, and he serves on the board of directors and compensation committee of Vivus, Inc., a publicly held pharmaceutical company. He holds a B.S. in Pharmacy from Fordham University and an M.B.A. from Iona College.

We believe that Mr. Casamento’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his significant experience in operational and management roles within both large and small pharmaceutical companies, including Osteologix, Inc., Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Interneuron Pharmaceuticals and Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. He also has extensive prior experience working in business development and provides the Company with extremely useful expertise in developing its business base, as highlighted by his position as Executive Director at The Sage Group, a consulting company specializing in the pharmaceutical space. Mr. Casamento also provides broad financial expertise that assists the Company in his current role on both our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.

Carl W. Cotman, Ph.D.directors. Dr. Lippa is a co-founder of the Company. He has been a Scientific Director of and consultant to the Company since October 1987, and has served as a director of the Company from March 1989 to October 1990 and since November 1991. Dr. Cotman is currently a Professor of Neurology and Neurobiology and Behavior at the University of California, Irvine, where he also held various other teaching and research positions since he began his career there in 1968. Since 1995 he has also been the Director of the Institute for Brain Aging and Dementia at the University of California, Irvine. He has chaired the Scientific Advisory Council of the Alzheimer’s Association and is currently a member of numerous professional associations and committees, including the National Institute of Aging Task Force and the Bayer Consumer Care Nutrition Advisory Board. Dr. Cotman also serves on editorial boards of publications such as the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias. Dr. Cotman received his B.A. in Chemistry from Wooster College, an M.A. in Analytical Chemistry from Wesleyan University, and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from Indiana University.

We believe that Dr. Cotman’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his extensive scientific knowledge and understanding of drug discovery and potential pathways contributing to diseases of the central nervous system. His extensive scientific background includes more than 40 years in various teaching and research positions at the University of California, Irvine, working in the fields of neurobiology, memory and cognition, and the basic mechanisms causing brain dysfunction in aging and the development of Alzheimer’s disease. He currently is Chairman of our Research and Development Committee.

Peter F. Drake, Ph.D. has served as a director of the Company since October 2003. Dr. Drake is currently the Managing General Partner of Mayflower Partners, a healthcare investment fund. From 1999 to 2002, he served as a Managing Director in the Equity Research Department of Prudential Securities, Inc., after Prudential acquired Vector Securities International, an investment banking firm co-founded by Dr. Drake in 1988. Vector specialized in raising capital for emerging healthcare companies and acted as an advisor in merger and alliance transactions in the healthcare area. Dr. Drake also co-founded Deerfield Management and Vector Fund Management, both of which are healthcare hedge funds. Dr. Drake joined the investment banking firm of Kidder, Peabody & Co. as a Biotechnology Analyst in 1983, becoming a partner in 1986. He currently serves on the board of directors of Trustmark Insurance Co., a healthcare insurance provider, Penwest Pharmaceuticals, a publicly traded drug delivery company, Sequoia Sciences, a private biotechnology company, and Rodman & Renshaw Capital Group, an investment bank that provides corporate finance, strategic advisory and related services to public and private companies. Dr. Drake received a B.A. degree in Biology from Bowdoin College and attended the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania. After receiving his Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Neurobiology from Bryn Mawr College, he spent three years as a Senior Research Associate in the Department of Developmental Biology and Anatomy at Case Western Reserve University.

We believe that Dr. Drake’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his extensive experience working as an executive in the investment banking industry and his understanding of corporate finance and capital markets that he gained through his work at Kidder Peabody & Co., Vector Securities International, which he co-founded, and Prudential Securities, Inc. With a Ph.D. in the neurosciences plus his capital markets expertise and experience, Dr. Drake provides a very unique set of qualifications and perspectives to assist with the development of the Company. He currently serves as Chairman of our Governance and Nominations Committees and as a member of our Audit Committee.

M. Ross Johnson, Ph.D. has served as a director of the Company since April 2002. Dr. Johnson is currently Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and President of Parion Sciences, Inc., a privately held pharmaceutical company that he co-founded in 1999. From 2002 to 2008, Dr. Johnson served on the board of directors of ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals, a biopharmaceutical company focused on the clinical development of antiviral and anticancer technologies. From 1995 to 1999, Dr. Johnson served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific Officer of Trimeris Inc., a pharmaceutical company that he took public in 1997. From 1987 to 1994, he served as Vice President of Chemistry at Glaxo Inc., where he was part of the original scientific founding team for Glaxo’s research entry into the United States. From 1971 to 1987, Dr. Johnson served in key scientific and research management positions with Pfizer Central Research. Dr. Johnson currently holds board positions with Parion Sciences, Inc. and the University of North Carolina Education Advancement Board. He also serves on the Advisory Boards of the College of Chemistry at the University of California at Berkeley, the Department of Chemistry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Biomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise (BRITE) Center for Excellence located at North Carolina Central University and the Graduate Education Advisory Board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He received his B.S. in Chemistry from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry from the University of California, Santa Barbara.

We believe that Dr. Johnson’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his extensive contributions to drug discovery and development, which have resulted in over 300 scientific publications, patents and invited presentations, of which include 119 issued patents, and his experience working on several advisory boards, as a chief executive officer and chief scientific officer of other private and public companies. His work experience at very large pharmaceutical companies and his expertise and success in the biotech start-up environment all lend to his considerable ability to help guide the Company. He currently serves as Chairman of our Compensation Committee and as a member of our Research and Development Committee.

Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D. has served as a director of the Company since April 2002, and served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from August 2002 to August 2008. In August 2008, Dr. Stoll became Executive Chairman of the Company. From 2001 to 2002, Dr. Stoll served as a consultant to the venture capital industry. From 1998 to January 2001, Dr. Stoll served as Executive Vice President at Fresenius Medical Care-North America, with responsibility for the Dialysis Products Division, Spectra Medical Services Division (diagnostic services), and the North American CIS group (computer information systems). From 1991 to 1998, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Ohmeda Inc., a pharmaceutical and medical products company with worldwide sales of approximately $1 billion. He also was a member of the board of directors of BOC Group, PLC, now partHepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly, ContraVir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) since December 2015 where he is a member of The Linde Group. From 1986 to 1991,the audit committee, the compensation committee and the corporate governance/nominating committee. Dr. StollLippa was co-founder of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc., where he served as a senior executive at Bayer AG, where he rose to the position of Executive Vice President and General Managerchairman of the worldwide diagnostic business group that managed direct sales, manufacturing, researchboard and development and serviceschief executive officer from its inception in over 60 countries. From 1976 to 1986,1995 through 2005. Dr. Stoll held positionsLippa stepped down as a director of increasing responsibility at the American Critical Care division of American Hospital Supply Corporation (now Baxter), including President of American Critical Care from 1981 to 1986. He started his industrial careerDOV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 1972 at The Upjohn Company, where he conducted Phase I – IV clinical pharmacology studies in humans. Dr. Stoll serves on the board of directors of Chelsea Therapeutics, a publicly held company focusing on the acquisition, development and commercialization of products for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases and cancer. Dr. Stoll also serves on the board of directors of Delcath Systems, Inc., a publicly held company engaged in the development and testing of systems for the treatment of liver cancer. Additionally, Dr. Stoll serves on the Alumni Advisory Board for the School of Pharmacy for the University of Connecticut. He obtained his B.S. in pharmacy from Ferris State University and a Ph.D. in biopharmaceutics from the University of Connecticut. He also carried out post-doctoral studies in pharmacokinetics at the University of Michigan and has published over 30 scientific papers and contributed chapters in textbooks in the field of drug kinetics.

2006. We believe that Dr. Stoll’sLippa’s qualifications to serve on theour Board of Directors include his substantial experience working as a consultant to the venture capital industry, his tenure as an executive officer at several large pharmaceutical and medical products companies, and his service on the boardformer positions of directors of other public biotechnology companies. Dr. Stoll provides the Board of Directors with valuable operational, strategic, leadership and management experience, and his varied experience allows him to provide financial and capital raising expertise to the Board and an important perspective on issues facing biopharmaceutical companies. In addition, his service on the board of directors of other companies and his international business experience provide substantial corporate governance expertise.

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D. has served as a director since May 2007. Dr. Varney was appointed Chief Scientific Officer and Chief Operating Officer in January 2006, and appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in August 2008. Prior to joining the Company Dr. Varney held the senior level position of Viceand President and Head of Discovery at Sepracor, Inc., a publicly held pharmaceutical company, from June 2004 to January 2006. From July 2003 to June 2004, Dr. Varney was ViceInterim Chief Executive Officer and Interim President of Drug Discovery at Bionomics, Ltd., a publicly held biotechnology company that focuses on drugs to treat cancer and disorders of the central nervous system. From October 1994 to September 1999, Dr. Varney held positions of increasing responsibilities overas well as his five-year tenure at SIBIA Neurosciences, Inc., a biotechnology company, including his most recent position as Director of Neuropharmacology. Upon the acquisition of SIBIA by Merck, Inc. in September 1999, he was appointed a Director at Merck’s San Diego facility until April 2003. Prior to SIBIA, he held research positions at Servier in France and Merck Sharp & Dohme in the U.K. Dr. Varney received his B.Sc. in Biochemistry with honors from Surrey University, U.K. and completed his Ph.D. and postdoctoral training at Oxford University, U.K.

We believe that Dr. Varney’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include hiscurrent position as the Company’s President and Chief ExecutiveScientific Officer, and his experience working in senior level positions at Sepracor, Inc., Bionomics, Inc.management roles in other pharmaceutical companies as described above. We also believe that Dr. Lippa’s qualifications also include his experiences as a financier of both biopharmaceutical and SIBIA (later as part of Merck, Inc).other companies. Dr. VarneyLippa provides the Board with both technical and scientific expertise in drug discovery and drug development, research management, governmental regulations and strategic planning expertise that is important to the advancement of our research platformplatforms as well as to the overall success of the Company.

Executive Officers Dr. Lippa was appointed to our Board in March 2013.

Each

Jeff E. Margolis. Mr. Margolis is the president and founder of Aurora, and has been since its inception in 1994. Aurora Capital Corp., a corporation wholly owned by Mr. Margolis, is a significant equity owner and managing member of Aurora. Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis jointly manage, since 2004, Atypical BioCapital Management LLC and Atypical BioVentures Fund LLC, a life sciences fund management company and venture fund, respectively. Since 2006, Mr. Margolis has also been the chief financial officer of Xintria Pharmaceutical Corporation, a Delaware corporation, as well as a member of its board of directors. We believe that Mr. Margolis’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his significant experience in financial, operational and management roles within pharmaceutical companies and within the financial industry as described above. He also has extensive prior experience working in business development and provides the Company with extremely useful expertise in financing and capital markets, knowledge gained though his position as president of Aurora. Mr. Margolis also provides broad financial expertise. Mr. Margolis was appointed to our Board in March 2013.

Kathryn MacFarlane, PharmD. Ms. MacFarlane is the co-founder and managing partner of SmartPharma, LLC (“SmartPharma”), where she has contracted to serve as the chief commercial officer of Agile Therapeutics and the senior vice president of commercial development for Napo Pharmaceuticals. SmartPharma performs market assessments and develops forecasts and commercial plans for pharmaceutical products. Ms. MacFarlane has provided advice to over 75 companies and investors on financing, licensing, and acquisition of drug products and technologies. She is an experienced pharmaceutical executive officers serveswith over 25 years in the industry, including senior level roles in drug development, marketing, and sales management at Parke-Davis, Pfizer, and Warner Chilcott, where she was the discretionvice president of sales, marketing, and new product planning. Ms. MacFarlane played a key role in the launch of several leading brands, most notably Lipitor®, Celexa®, and Loestrin® 24. Ms. MacFarlane earned a B.S. and PharmD from Purdue University and completed a Postdoctoral Fellowship with Rutgers University and Hoffmann-LaRoche. She was named a Distinguished Alumna and was awarded the Eaton Entrepreneur of the Year by the Purdue University School of Pharmacy, where she currently is an Affiliate Faculty member. Ms. MacFarlane is chairwoman on the finance committee for the board of directors of INMED Partnerships for Children, and a member of the executive committee of the Woodley Park Community Association. We believe Ms. MacFarlane’s qualifications to serve on our Board include both her biopharmaceutical consulting background and her familiarity with the biopharmaceutical regulatory and commercialization environment, as well as the breadth of Directors. The names ofher technical and therapeutic knowledge, as discussed above. Ms. Macfarlane has also served in numerous senior executive positions at various biopharmaceutical companies. Ms. MacFarlane was appointed to our executive officers and certain biographical information about them are set forth below:Board in September 2014.

 

Name

Age

Position with Company

Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.

68Executive Chairman

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.

44President and Chief Executive Officer

Maria S. Messinger

43Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

James H. Coleman

69Senior Vice President, Business Development

Steven A. Johnson

59Vice President, Preclinical Development

The biographical summaries for Drs. StollTimothy Jones. Until April 10, 2020, Mr. Jones was the vice president global pharmaceutical and Varney have been presented earlier. There are no family relationships between any directormedical OTC at Purisys, an affiliate of Noramco formed in September 2019. Mr. Jones received approval from Purisys to join the Board subject to (i) Mr. Jones’ recusal from Company discussions about Noramco or Purisys, and (ii) Mr. Jones’ relinquishment of responsibility of the Company’s account representation to the chief executive officer and any other director or executive officer.

Maria S. Messingerpresident of Purisys. Mr. Jones’ experience includes 15 years of API (active pharmaceutical ingredient) sales, business development, and sourcing in the niche, controlled substances space. He is recognized in the industry for his expertise in the strategic development and growth of active pharmaceutical ingredient categories, through partnerships with a broad cross section of brand and generic companies worldwide. His extensive knowledge base and expertise across multiple pharmaceutical disciplines have contributed to his successful track record of financial growth. He previously held leadership roles with QuVa Pharma, Par Sterile Products, and Johnson Matthey. We believe Mr. Jones’ qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive background in biopharmaceutical business development and supply chain as well as his familiarity with business involving controlled substances, particularly cannabinoid controlled substances, as well as the breadth of his industry network. Mr. Jones has also served in numerous leadership positions at various biopharmaceutical companies. Mr. Jones was appointed to our Board in January 2020.

Richard Purcell. In addition to his role at the Company, Richard Purcell (Age: 59) has managed a consulting firm, DNA Healthlink, Inc. Since 2005, Mr. Purcell has been advising emerging biopharmaceutical and technology companies on new business strategy, operations management, and clinical development of novel compounds. In his role as executive vice president of research and development for Generex Biotechnology Corporation, he is active in strategic planning, business development, clinical operations, R&D, and M&A. Mr. Purcell has over 30 years of experience in consulting and advising emerging biopharmaceutical and technology companies on new business strategy, operations management, clinical development of novel compounds, data solutions for clinical and medical applications, patient engagement and communication, medical education for professionals and consumers, and data analytics for outcomes research. He is a biopharmaceutical development specialist, with extensive experience in providing consulting services to financial, venture capital, and start-up companies to concentrate on new business strategy and clinical development of novel compounds. From 2011 to 2017, Mr. Purcell was the president and founder of a healthcare IT startup, IntelliSanté. Previously, Mr. Purcell was President of ClinPro, Inc., a mid-sized clinical research organization (CRO). At ClinPro, Mr. Purcell was responsible for the company’s business development, strategic planning, sales and IT operations. His significant expertise in designing and executing clinical studies for the marketing of drugs was critical to expand the company’s operations into the global marketplace. Prior to joining ClinPro, Mr. Purcell worked for SCP Communications (“SCP”), a medical communications company, where he served as corporate vice president and general manager of the clinical programs division. During his time at SCP, he founded SCP Clinical Programs, a CRO specializing in Phase IIIb and Phase IV clinical research studies. At SCP, Mr. Purcell designed and managed a number of clinical programs for such drugs as Lipitor, Avandia, Accolate, Meridia, and Tequin. In addition, he participated in the startup of the medical website, Medscape, through sales and business development initiatives. Early in his career, Mr. Purcell was the business manager of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology practice at a management consulting firm, the Kline Group, after beginning his career as a scientist at Hoffmann-LaRoche and Integrated Genetics.

David Dickason. Mr. Dickason is a is a highly experienced senior executive with over 30 years of pharmaceutical development experience and 9 approved NDAs. He has broad experience in product development and cGMP manufacturing for a variety of products including parenteral, inhalable, topical, solid and liquid oral dosage forms and specialized expertise in drug product development using innovative technologies for both existing and new chemical entities.

Mr. Dickason has held senior technical roles at multiple companies including iCeutica, Inc., Iroko Pharmaceuticals LLC, GTx, Inc. Alkermes, Inc. and Cephalon, Inc. He was Director of Formulation Development at GTx, Inc. from 2006 to 2010. At Iroko Pharmaceuticals, LLC, he was Vice President Chief Financial Officerof Technical Development from 2010 to 2016 where he established and Corporate Secretary ofled the Companydevelopment team which successfully completed full drug product formulation and process development from Phase 1 through NDA filing and approval in December 1999. She has served as Controller of the Company since September 1994. From August 1989 to September 1994, Ms. Messinger servedless than 36 months for 3 products in a progression of positions at Ernst & Young LLP, including her most recent position as an Audit Manager. She holds a B.A. from the School of Business Administration and Economics at California State University, Fullerton and maintains an active license as a Certified Public Accountant in California.

James H. Coleman was appointed Senior Vice President, Business Development in May 2000.parallel. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Colemanhe was President and Senior PartnerFellow of Diversified Healthcare Management, Inc., or DHM, a biopharmaceutical and biotechnology consulting firm that he founded in 1997. From March 1999 to May 2000, the Company was a client of DHM. During 1996, Mr. Coleman served as Vice President of CommercialTechnology Development at CoCensys,iCeutica, Inc., a biotechnology company, where he directed from 2016 to 2020.

Mr. Dickason has extensive experience in strategic planning and external business development. Mr. Coleman was also employedmanaging internal and outsourced drug product and process development activities as an executive at Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. for over 25 years, where he acquired extensive managementwell as Commercial manufacturing technical activities from early phase through approval. Experience includes full development of drug products and establishment of first-of-kind multi-million dollar manufacturing equipment and facilities. He has broad expertise in new product development, global strategic marketing, sales, CNS researchRegulatory CMC filings from initial strategy through final submission to the FDA and clinical research trial methodologies. Mr. Coleman holds a B.S.International Regulatory Agencies.

 Committees of the Board

The Board does not maintain any separate standing board committees. Instead, the functions of each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nomination Committee have been and are currently being addressed by the full Board. This arrangement was initially implemented in Applied Biology from2013 when current management was put in place. At that time there were no independent directors. Since that time, the UniversityCompany has added two independent directors, one in 2014 and one in 2020; however, because of Rhode Island.the small size of the Board generally and because the Board includes only one independent director, the Company has not appointed standing committees.

Steven A. Johnson, Ph.DAudit Committee., was appointed Vice President of Preclinical Development in January 2004

The Board meets with the Company’s independent registered public accountants and appointed as an executive officermanagement to prepare for and to review the results of the Companyannual audit and to discuss the annual and quarterly financial statements, earnings releases and related matters. The Board, among other things, (i) selects and retains the independent registered public accountants, (ii) reviews with the independent registered public accountants the scope and anticipated cost of their audit, and their independence and performance, (iii) reviews accounting practices, financial structure and financial reporting, (iv) receives and considers the independent registered public accountants’ comments as to controls, adequacy of staff and management performance and procedures in February 2007. Dr. Johnson has served as Director, Clinical Research from 2000 to 2003, Director, Biological Research from 1995 to 2000,connection with audit and Senior Scientist of the Company from 1994 to 1995. From 1989 to 1994, Dr. Johnson was a Research Assistant Professor in the School of Gerontology at the University of Southern California. Prior to that, he conducted research in the field of the molecular biology of development at the California Institute of Technology,financial controls, (v) reviews and conducted research in the field of molecular biology of Alzheimer’s disease at the University of Southern California. A recipient of numerous federal, statepre-approves all audit and private grants, Dr. Johnson has published more than 50 scientific papers. He received his B.S. in Food Science from Oregon State University and his Ph.D. in Molecular Biology from Purdue University.

Other Key Employees

Leslie J. Street, Ph.D., was appointed Senior Director of Medicinal Chemistry in March 2007. From October 2006 to January 2007, Dr. Street was the Senior Director and Head of Medicinal Chemistry at Renovis, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery and development of drugs to address neurological conditions and neuroinflammatory disorders. From March 2006 to August 2006, he served as a consultant to Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of therapeutics to treat diseases and disorders of the central nervous system. From October 1985 to March 2006, Dr. Street conducted research at Merck’s Neuroscience Research Center in the U.K., a division of Merck, Inc., with his most recent position as Distinguished Senior Investigator of Medicinal Chemistry. During his tenure at Merck, Dr. Street was focused on drug discovery programs for treating migraine, cognitive disorders, anxiety and schizophrenia. He led medicinal chemistry teams that were successful in advancing several clinical candidates in the central nervous system disease area, including the anti-migraine drug Rizatriptan (MAXALT®), which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1998. Dr. Street has published nearly 50 peer-reviewed manuscripts and over 80 patents. He received his B.S. and his Ph.D. in Chemistry from Leeds University in the U.K.

Scientific Consultants

The key scientific consultantnon-audit services provided to the Company by the independent registered public accountants, and (vi) reviews and pre-approves all related-party transactions. The Board does not itself prepare financial statements or perform audits, and its members are not auditors or certifiers of the Company’s financial statements.

Since the change in composition of our Board in March 2013, the composition of an Audit Committee has not been determined, nor has the current Board adopted an amended written charter. When an Audit Committee is Gary S. Lynch, Ph.D. Arvid M. Carlsson, M.D., Ph.D. servesre-established along with a written charter, such charter will be made available on the Company’s website at www.respirerx.com.

Compensation Committee

The traditional functions of the Compensation Committee include, without limitation, administering the Company’s incentive ownership programs and approving the compensation to be paid to the Company’s directors and executive officers. The Board acting in the capacity of a Compensation Committee typically meets no less frequently than annually as a consultantcircumstances dictate to discuss and determine executive officer and director compensation. Historically, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer annually reviews the performance of each executive officer (other than the Chief Executive Officer, whose performance is reviewed by the Board). The conclusions reached and recommendations based on these reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and annual award amounts, are presented to the Board, which can exercise its discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments or awards to executive officers. The Board is entitled to, but generally does not, retain the services of Directors.any compensation consultants. Neither the Board nor management has engaged a compensation consultant for fiscal year 2019.

Gary S. Lynch, Ph.D., 66, is a co-founder

Since the change in composition of the Company. He has been a Scientific Director of and consultant to the Company since October 1987 and served as a director of the Company fromour Board in March 1988 to March 1989 and again from December 1994 to December 1995. Dr. Lynch has been a Professor in2013, the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California, Irvine since 1981, and has held various other teaching and research positions at that University since 1969. Dr. Lynch has authored or co-authored nearly 600 research publications in the areas of neurobiology, cognition and memory. Dr. Lynch holds a B.A. from the University of Delaware and a Ph.D. from Princeton University.

Arvid Carlsson, M.D., Ph.D., 87, has been a consultant to the Company since April 2002. A co-recipient of the 2000 Nobel Prize for Medicine, Dr. Carlsson is Professor Emeritus at the University of Göteborg, and is a member of the Swedish Academy of Sciences and a foreign affiliate of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Carlsson has authored several hundred articles, which have helped to form the basis of modern neuropsychopharmacology. In 1975, he was elected as a Foreign Corresponding Fellow of The American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. In addition to the Nobel Prize, he has been the recipient of The Japan Prize in Psychology and Psychiatry, The Research Prize of the Lundbeck Foundation (Denmark) and the Lieber Prize (USA) for research in schizophrenia. He was also the recipient of the Legion of Honour (France). Dr. Carlsson’s memberships include Member of the Academia Europaea, Member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Honorary Fellow of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry, Honorary Foreign Associate of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. and Honorary Member of the German Society of Biological Psychiatry. Dr. Carlsson received his M.D. and Ph.D. in Pharmacology from the University of Lund, Sweden.

Director Independence

A majority of members of the Board have performed the functions of Directors are “independent” directors, as that terma Compensation Committee and the composition of a Compensation Committee has not been determined nor has the current Board adopted a written committee charter. When a Compensation Committee is defined under Section 803re-established along with a written charter, such charter will be made available on the Company’s website at www.respirerx.com.

Governance and Nominating Committee

The traditional functions of the NYSE Amex Company Guide.Governance and Nominations Committee include, without limitation, (i) identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board, (ii) recommending director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders and to fill vacancies that may be created by the expansion of the number of directors serving on the Board and by resignation, retirement or other termination of services of incumbent directors, (iii) developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance guidelines and changes thereto, (iv) ensuring that the Board and the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws are structured in a way that best serves the Company’s practices and objectives, (v) leading the Board in its annual review of the Board’ performance; and (vi) recommending to the Board nominees for each committee. Accordingly, the Board, acting in the capacity of a Governance and Nominations Committee, annually reviews the composition of the Board as a whole and makes recommendations, if deemed necessary, to enhance the composition of the Board. The Board first considers a candidate’s management experience and then considers issues of Directors has affirmatively determined thatjudgment, background, conflicts of interest, integrity, ethics and commitment to the following six directors are independent: Robert F. Allnutt, John F. Benedik, Charles J. Casamento, Carl W. Cotman, Peter F. Drakegoal of maximizing stockholder value when considering director candidates. The Board also focuses on issues of diversity, such as diversity of gender, race and M. Ross Johnson.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

national origin, education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by each of the named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The information under the heading, “Stock Awards” for all applicable named executive officers includes the fair market value of shares of our common stock issued in exchange for accrued paid time off in excess of fifty (50) days, as explained more fully below. The information contained under the heading, “Option Awards” for all named executive officers includes the estimated value of equity awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as of the grant date of such awards, as explained more fully below, andBoard does not reflect actual cash payments or actual dollars awarded.

Name and Principal Position

  Year   Salary
($)
   Bonus
($)
   Stock
Awards

($)(1)
   Option
Awards

($)(2)
   All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
  Total
($)
 

Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.

   2010    $338,218     —       —      $—       —     $338,218  

Executive Chairman

   2009    $305,250     —       —      $93,552     —     $398,802  
   2008    $370,000     —       —      $87,280    $—     $457,280  

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.

   2010    $330,905    $30,000     —      $—      $49,600(4)  $410,505  

President and Chief

   2009    $298,650     —       —      $97,706    $68,800(5)  $465,156  

Executive Officer

   2008    $347,277     —       —      $241,933    $88,000(6)  $677,210  

Maria S. Messinger, CPA

   2010    $222,127    $30,000     —      $—       —     $252,127  

Vice President, Chief

   2009    $200,475     —       —      $63,143     —     $263,618  

Financial Officer and

   2008    $243,000     —      $14,870    $43,640     —     $301,510  

Corporate Secretary

             

James H. Coleman

   2010    $228,526     —       —      $—      $9,279(7)  $237,805  

Senior Vice President,

   2009    $206,250     —       —      $45,696    $9,280(7)  $261,226  

Business Development

   2008    $250,000     —      $5,464    $43,640    $9,280(7)  $308,384  

Steven A. Johnson, Ph.D.

   2010    $202,017    $30,000     —      $—      $—     $232,017  

Senior Vice President,

   2009    $182,325     —       —      $43,536    $—     $225,861  

Business Development

   2008    $221,000     —      $8,589    $43,640    $—     $273,229  

(1)

Amounts represent the fair market value of shares issued in exchange for cancellation of accrued paid time off in excess of fifty (50) days as of the end of May 2008, based upon the employee’s current rate of compensation per day. The exchange took place on May 30, 2008 based on the closing price per share of our common stock on the NYSE Amex of $0.78 on such date and rounded to the nearest whole share. In connection with the transaction, Ms. Messinger, Mr. Coleman and Dr. Johnson received 19,064, 7,005 and 11,012 shares of our common stock, respectively. The shares of our common stock were issued under our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.

(2)

Amounts represent the aggregate grant date estimated fair value of the option award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in footnote 1 to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.

(3)

In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules, “Other Annual Compensation” in the form of perquisites and other personal benefits has been omitted where the aggregate amount of such perquisites and other personal benefits was less than $10,000.

(4)

Represents payments by us to Dr. Varney under the terms of his employment agreement and related to his relocation to southern California, including $31,000 for a mortgage subsidy, subject to a gross-up of $18,600 to cover his additional income tax liabilities. See “Employment and Consulting Agreements” on page 51.

(5)

Represents payments by us to Dr. Varney under the terms of his employment agreement and related to his relocation to southern California, including $43,000 for a mortgage subsidy, subject to and also including a gross-up of $25,800, to cover his additional income tax liabilities. See “Employment and Consulting Agreements” on page 51.

(6)

Represents payments by us to Dr. Varney under the terms of his employment agreement and related to his relocation to southern California, including $55,000 for a mortgage subsidy, subject to and also including a gross-up of $33,000, to cover his additional income tax liabilities. See “Employment and Consulting Agreements” on page 51.

(7)

Represents premiums for life insurance for Mr. Coleman, in lieu of participation in our medical benefit plans.

The table below details the cash and estimated values for the non-cash components of the above summary compensation information for each named executive officer for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The non-cash components include the estimated value of equity awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, as described more fully in the table above.

Name and Principal Position

  Year   Total Cash
Compensation ($)
   Total Non-cash
Compensation ($)
   Total ($) 

Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.

   2010    $338,218    $—      $338,218  

Executive Chairman

   2009    $305,250    $93,552    $398,802  
   2008    $370,000    $87,280    $457,280  

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.

   2010    $410,505    $—      $410,505  

President and Chief Executive Officer

   2009    $367,450    $97,706    $465,156  
   2008    $435,277    $241,933    $677,210  

Maria S. Messinger, CPA

   2010    $252,127    $—      $252,127  

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

   2009    $200,475    $63,143    $263,618  

and Corporate Secretary

   2008    $243,000    $58,510    $301,510  

James H. Coleman

   2010    $237,805    $—      $237,805  

Senior Vice President, Business

   2009    $215,530    $45,696    $261,226  

Development

   2008    $259,280    $49,104    $308,384  

Steven A. Johnson, Ph.D.

   2010    $232,017    $—      $232,017  

Vice President, Preclinical

   2009    $182,325    $43,536    $225,861  

Development

   2008    $221,000    $52,229    $273,229  

Grants of Plan Based Awards

There were no grants of plan-based equity awards to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. The amounts shown below reflect the target and maximum amounts based on the individual’s current salary and position that can be received under the Company’s performance-based incentive compensation program and the terms of such individual’s employment agreement, if applicable.

Name

      Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units

(#)
   All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)
   Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
   Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)
 
  Grant Date   Threshold
($)
   Target
($)
   Maximum
($)
         

Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.

   N/A     —      $74,000    $74,000     —       —       —       N/A  

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.

   N/A     —      $72,400    $72,400     —       —       —       N/A  

Maria S. Messinger, CPA

   N/A     —      $48,600    $48,600     —       —       —       N/A  

James H. Coleman

   N/A     —      $50,000    $125,000     —       —       —       N/A  

Steven A. Johnson, Ph.D.

   N/A     —      $44,200    $44,200     —       —       —       N/A  

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan Based Awards

In June 2004, the Board of Directors approved a performance-based incentive compensation program for named executive officers that included cash bonus targets of 20% of respective annual base salaries. Actual bonus amounts may differ from the established targets based upon our performance, as well as that of the individual named executive officer, as compared to established goals. For the year ended December 31, 2010, performance bonuses of $30,000 were awarded to each of Dr. Mark A. Varney, Ms. Maria S. Messinger and Dr. Steven A. Johnson. These performance bonuses represented less than 20% of the annual base salary for each of the respective named executive officers. There were no performance bonuses awarded to the named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

The exercise price for the stock options granted to the named executive officers is no less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant. Options vest at a rate of 33 1/3% per year starting on the anniversary date of the option grant and are contingent upon the officer’s continued employment. Accordingly, the option will provide a return to the named executive officer only if he or she remains our employee and the market price of our common stock appreciates over the option term. There were no stock options granted to the named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2010.

To better align the interests of our named executive officers with those of its stockholders, to create ownership focus and to build long-term commitment, we have adopted a common stock ownership policy for our named executive officers. The policy requires named executive officers to acquire and maintain ownership of at least 30,000 shares of our common stock before December 16, 2007, or within three years of commencement of service as a named executive officer, whichever is later. Thereafter, the policy provides for the withholding of salary increases and bonus payments, until the share ownership level has been achieved and maintained by such named executive officer. The Board of Directors has determined that all named executive officers are currently in compliance with the above common stock ownership policy.

See also “Employment and Consulting Agreements” for further discussion of compensation arrangements pursuant to which the amounts listed under the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan Based Awards Table were paid or awarded and the criteria for such payment or award.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

There were no outstanding unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2010. The table below relates solely to outstanding option awards as of December 31, 2010. Except as noted in the footnotes below, the options listed below vest at a rate of 33 1/3% per year commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and have a ten-year term.

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned Options
(#)
   Option
Exercise
Price
   Option
Expiration Date
 

Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.

   187,667    375,333     —      $0.20     08/22/2019  
   133,334    66,666     —      $0.54     01/18/2018  
   300,000    —       —      $1.30     12/18/2016  
   205,017(1)   —       —      $2.95     02/09/2016  
   300,000    —       —      $2.35     12/01/2015  
   300,000    —       —      $2.68     12/16/2014  
   600,000    —       —      $2.76     12/09/2013  
   14,545(2)   —     �� —      $4.40     09/02/2013  
   1,061(3)   —       —      $3.77     08/29/2013  
   2,326(3)   —       —      $1.72     07/31/2013  
   2,222(3)   —       —      $1.80     06/30/2013  
   2,247(3)   —       —      $1.78     05/30/2013  
   3,604(3)   —       —      $1.11     04/30/2013  
   5,556(3)   —       —      $0.72     03/31/2013  
   5,634(3)   —       —      $0.71     02/28/2013  
   600,000(4)   —       —      $0.78     08/13/2012  
   30,000    —       —      $2.68     04/09/2012  

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.

   196,000    392,000     —      $0.20     08/22/2019  
   133,334    66,666     —      $0.97     08/13/2018  
   133,334    66,666     —      $0.54     01/18/2018  
   250,000    —       —      $1.30     12/18/2016  
   750,000(5)   —       —      $2.95     01/30/2016  

Maria S. Messinger, CPA

   126,667    253,333     —      $0.20     08/22/2019  
   66,667    33,333     —      $0.54     01/18/2018  
   125,000    —       —      $1.30     12/18/2016  
   100,000    —       —      $2.35     12/01/2015  
   100,000    —       —      $2.68     12/16/2014  
   75,000    —       —      $2.76     12/09/2013  
   663(3)   —       —      $3.77     08/29/2013  
   1,453(3)   —       —      $1.72     07/31/2013  
   1,389(3)   —       —      $1.80     06/30/2013  
   1,404(3)   —       —      $1.78     05/30/2013  
   2,252(3)   —       —      $1.11     04/30/2013  
   3,472(3)   —       —      $0.72     03/31/2013  
   3,521(3)   —       —      $0.71     02/28/2013  
   50,000    —       —      $0.75     12/16/2012  
   40,000    —       —      $2.27     04/24/2011  

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned Options
(#)
   Option
Exercise
Price
   Option
Expiration Date
 

James H. Coleman

   91,667    183,333     —      $0.20     08/22/2019  
   66,667    33,333     —      $0.54     01/18/2018  
   125,000    —       —      $1.30     12/18/2016  
   100,000    —       —      $2.35     12/01/2015  
   100,000    —       —      $2.68     12/16/2014  
   75,000    —       —      $2.76     12/09/2013  
   840(3)   —       —      $3.77     08/29/2013  
   1,841(3)   —       —      $1.72     07/31/2013  
   1,759(3)   —       —      $1.80     06/30/2013  
   1,779(3)   —       —      $1.78     05/30/2013  
   2,853(3)   —       —      $1.11     04/30/2013  
   4,398(3)   —       —      $0.72     03/31/2013  
   4,460(3)   —       —      $0.71     02/28/2013  
   50,000(6)   —       —      $0.80     02/11/2013  
   100,000    —       —      $0.75     12/16/2012  
   50,000    —       —      $2.11     10/09/2011  

Steven A. Johnson, Ph.D.

   87,334    174,666     —      $0.20     08/22/2019  
   66,667    33,333     —      $0.54     01/18/2018  
   150,000    —       —      $1.30     12/18/2016  
   100,000    —       —      $2.35     12/01/2015  
   100,000    —       —      $2.68     12/16/2014  
   50,000    —       —      $2.76     12/09/2013  
   30,000    —       —      $0.75     12/16/2012  

(1)

Dr. Stoll received options in lieu of cash reimbursement of real estate expenses incurred in connection with the relocation of his principal residence to southern California. These options were fully vested on the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to $2.95, representing the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE Amex on the grant date.

(2)

Beginning in May 2003, Dr. Stoll voluntarily deferred his entire base salary, as previously reduced. In September 2003, Dr. Stoll agreed to accept stock options to purchase 14,545 shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of this deferred salary. The number of options issued represents $64,000 of his deferred salary divided by the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE Amex on the date that Dr. Stoll’s salary was re-instated in September 2003. These options were fully vested on the date of grant.

(3)

Represents stock options issued in lieu of a portion of base salary. The number of options issued represents the dollar value of base salary not received by the named executive officer divided by the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE Amex on the last trading day of the month during which the portion of base salary was not received by the named executive officer. These options were fully vested on the date of grant.

(4)

In connection with his employment, Dr. Stoll was granted options to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.78 per share, representing the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE Amex on the date of grant. Of the 600,000 options granted, 200,000 options vested immediately. Another 200,000 options vested upon securing the amendment to the Company’s agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier in October 2002. The remaining 200,000 options vested upon the achievement of pre-determined milestones, all of which were met by the beginning of 2007.

(5)

In connection with his employment, Dr. Varney was granted options to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.95 per share, representing the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Of the 750,000 options granted, 100,000 options vested upon his first date of employment on January 30, 2006; 100,000 options vested one-year from his initial date of employment, or January 30, 2007; and 550,000 options vested in equal annual installments over a three-year period from the date of grant.

(6)

During 2003, Mr. Coleman agreed to accept stock options in lieu of the cash bonus provided in his employment agreement. These options were fully vested on the date of grant and have an exercise price per share equal to $0.80, representing the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE Amex on the grant date.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

None of the Company’s named executive officers exercised any options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock or had any outstanding unvested stock awards during the year ended December 31, 2010.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control

The named executive officers have each entered into employment agreements and/or severance agreements governing payments upon termination or in the event we are subject to a change-in-control. See “Employment and Consulting Agreements” on page 51. In March 2009, the named executive officers also entered into retention agreements, the impact of which is included in this section titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.” The terms of such agreements are discussed under the heading “Related Party Transactions” on page 53.

Payments Made Upon Termination

Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer’s employment terminates, he or she shall be entitled to receive amounts earned during the term of his or her employment. Such amounts may include stock options awarded under our 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and independent of such plans, a portion of which may be subject to accelerated vesting, accrued obligations (including unused vacation pay), and a pro-rated bonus, if applicable. In the event that Dr. Stoll, Dr. Varney, Mr. Coleman or Ms. Messinger’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by such named executive officer for good reason (as defined in their respective agreements), such person shall be entitled to receive a severance payment of twelve (12) months of his or her base salary (with the exception of Dr. Varney who shall be entitled to receive a severance payment of twelve (12) months of his base salary based upon his average monthly base salary for the twelve (12) months immediately prior to the termination event). Additionally, in such instance Ms. Messinger may be entitled to twelve (12) months continued health and benefits coverage.

Payments Made Upon Termination Due to Death or Disability

In the event of termination of employment due to the death or disability of a named executive officer, in addition to the payment of accrued obligations, the named executive officer will receive benefits under our disability plan or payments under our life insurance plan, as appropriate. Additionally,formal policy with respect to Dr. Stoll, Dr. Varney and Mr. Coleman,diversity; however, the Board believes that it is essential that the members of the Board represent diverse viewpoints. In considering candidates for the Board, the board considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the eventcontext of disability such named executive officers will receive a salary benefit equalthese standards. With respect to the difference between any insurance proceeds received and twelve (12) months salary.

Payments Made Upon a Change-In-Control Without Termination

If we are subject to a change-in-control, irrespectivenomination of whether a termination of employment occurs, all stock options held bycontinuing directors for re-election, the named executive officer will automatically vest and become exercisable (with the exception of Mr. Coleman who will receive accelerated vesting for one additional year and only if he is terminated). Additionally, pursuantindividual’s contributions to the terms ofBoard are also considered.

Since the March 2009 retention agreements, under certain circumstances each named executive officer will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash bonus equal to six (6) months of the executive’s base salary.

Payments Made Upon Terminationchange in Connection With a Change-In-Control

If a named executive officer’s employment is terminated in connection with or, for Dr. Johnson within six (6) months following, a change of control without cause or for good reason (other than Dr. Johnson whose agreement does not include termination for good reason), then the named executive officers shall be entitled to the benefits listed under the headings “Payments Made Upon Termination” and “Payments Made Upon a Change-In-Control Without Termination,” included above. Additionally, in connection with such event, Dr. Johnson will receive a severance payment of twelve (12) months of his base salary and twelve (12) months continued health and benefits coverage. Further, pursuant to the terms of the March 2009 retention agreements, under certain circumstances each named executive officer will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash bonus equal to six (6) months of the executive’s base salary.

Employment and Consulting Agreements

Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D. has served as a director since April 2002 and became our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in August 2002. In August 2008, Dr. Stoll became our Executive Chairman and Dr. Varney became our President and Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Stoll’s employment agreement originally included a three-year term, was subsequently amended to include another three-year term expiring in August 2008, a one-year term expiring in August 2009, a one-year term expiring in August 2010 and another one-year term expiring in August 2011. As of December 31, 2010, his employment agreement called for a base salary of $370,000 per year. Dr. Stoll’s base salary is subject to annual review by our Compensation Committee. In connection with the original offer for his employment, Dr. Stoll was granted options to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.78 per share, representing 100% of the fair market value as of the date of grant. Of the 600,000 options granted, 200,000 options vested immediately. Another 200,000 options vested upon securing the amendment to our agreement with our collaborative partner, Servier, in October 2002. The remaining 200,000 options vested upon achievement of pre-determined milestones, all of which were met by the beginning of 2007. Under the terms of his employment agreement, in the event of termination of his employment, under certain circumstances Dr. Stoll is entitled to compensation equal to twelve (12) months of his then current salary. In addition, in the event of his termination of employment, in certain circumstances, any vested options granted to Dr. Stoll remain exercisable for the remainder of the original option term and any unvested options granted to Dr. Stoll in connection with his employment, as detailed above, may be subject to accelerated vesting and remain exercisable for the remainder of the original option term. In the event of termination due to disability, Dr. Stoll will be entitled to receive a salary benefit equal to the difference between any insurance proceeds received and twelve (12) months salary. Further, in the event that we are subject to a change-in-control, all unvested options then held by Dr. Stoll shall be subject to accelerated vesting.

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D. joined us as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Scientific Officer in January 2006 and was named President and Chief Executive Officer in August 2008. His employment agreement provides for a three-year term through August 2011 and calls for a base salary of $362,000 per year as of December 31, 2010. Dr. Varney’s employment agreement includes an annual bonus, at the discretioncomposition of our Board of Directors. In connection with his employment, Dr. Varney was granted options to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.95 per share, representing 100%in March 2013, the members of the fair market value asBoard have performed the functions of a Governance and Nominations Committee and the datecomposition of grant. The options have a ten-year termGovernance and vested according toNominations Committee has not been determined nor has the following schedule: (i) 100,000 upon the date of employment; (ii) 100,000 one year from the date of employmentcurrent Board adopted a written charter. When a Governance and (iii) 550,000 in equal annual installments over a three-year period. In connection with his naming as President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Varney was granted options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.97 per share, representing 100% of the fair market value as of the date of grant. The options have a ten-year term and vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, we will provide Dr. VarneyNominations Committee is re-established along with a mortgage subsidy over five years, terminatingwritten committee charter, such charter will be made available on the earlier of the date of his termination of employment or July 2011, in the form of a monthly payment, whereby we will pay 6% of the principal amount of a mortgage (which principal amount shall not to exceed $1,200,000) on his primary residence during the first year, which amount declines by 1% each year thereafter, and which amount is grossed up by a factor of 1.6 to cover Dr. Varney’s additional income tax liabilities. In addition to the foregoing, Dr. Varney received a $25,000 hiring bonus, $15,000 to cover miscellaneous relocation expenses, temporary housing and reimbursement of real estate closing fees, sales commissions and moving costs. In the event of termination of Dr. Varney’s employment without cause or for good reason, under certain circumstances he is entitled to receive compensation of twelve (12) months of his base salary based upon the average monthly base salary for the twelve (12) months immediately prior to the termination event and his vested options will remain exercisable for the balance of their original terms. In the event of termination due to disability, Dr. Varney will be entitled to receive a salary benefit equal to the difference between any insurance proceeds received and twelve (12) months salary. In addition, in the event that we are subject to a change-in-control, any unvested options then held by Dr. Varney shall be subject to accelerated vesting.Company’s website at www.respirerx.com.

Maria S. Messinger joined us as Controller in September 1994 and was named as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary in December 1999. Under the terms of her severance agreement, in the event of termination of her employment, under certain circumstances Ms. Messinger is entitled to receive compensation of twelve (12) months of her then current annual base salary, which as of December 31, 2010 was $243,000. Ms. Messinger’s severance agreement also includes a pro-rated bonus (if applicable) and continued employee benefits for a period of twelve (12) months following termination. Additionally, in the event that we are subject to a change-in-control, any unvested options then held by Ms. Messinger shall be subject to accelerated vesting.

James H. Coleman joined us as Senior Vice President, Business Development in May 2000. His employment agreement, as amended to date, provides a base salary of $250,000 per year as of December 31, 2010. Mr. Coleman’s employment agreement also provides an annual bonus between 0 and 50% of his annual base salary, at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer and subject to approval by our Compensation Committee. In connection with his employment, Mr. Coleman was granted options to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.02 per share, representing 100% of the fair market value as of the date of grant. The options vested in equal annual installments over a three-year period and had a ten-year term. In the event of termination of his employment, Mr. Coleman is entitled, under certain circumstances, to receive compensation of twelve (12) months of his then current salary and any unvested options then held by Mr. Coleman shall be subject to accelerated vesting for an additional one year period. Additionally, in the event of termination due to disability, Mr. Coleman will be entitled to receive a salary benefit equal to the difference between any insurance proceeds received and twelve (12) months salary.

Steven A. Johnson, Ph.D. joined us as a Senior Scientist in June 1994 and was named as Vice President, Preclinical Development in January 2004 and appointed as an executive officer in February 2007. Under the terms of his severance agreement, in the event of termination of Dr. Johnson’s employment without cause in connection with or within six (6) months following the date that we are subject to a change-in-control, under certain circumstances he is entitled to receive compensation of twelve (12) months of his then current salary, which as of December 31, 2010 was $221,000 per year. Dr. Johnson’s severance agreement also provides continued employee benefits for a period of twelve (12) months following termination. In addition, in the event that we are subject to a change-in-control, any unvested options then held by Dr. Johnson shall be subject to accelerated vesting.

Under the consulting agreement with Dr. Gary Lynch, a co-founder and Scientific Director of the Company, Dr. Lynch currently receives a consulting fee of $30,000 per year. The term of Dr. Lynch’s consulting agreement commenced in November 1987 and will continue until terminated by the respective parties thereto. The consulting agreement with Dr. Lynch obligates him to make himself available to us for consulting and advisory services for an average of three days per month.

Director Compensation

The

When the Compensation Committee useswas standing, it had used a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board of Directors.Board. In setting director compensation, the Compensation Committee considersconsidered the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties to usthe Company, as well as the skill-level required by usthe Company of members of the Board. The Board, sitting as a Compensation Committee has continued these policies in carrying out the duties of Directors. Similarthe previous Compensation Committee.

There were no option grants to executive officers, directors are subject toeither James Sapirstein (resigned as a minimum share ownership requirement. member of the Board in December 2019) or Kathryn MacFarlane during 2019 and 2018. Ms. MacFarlane earned $60,000 during 2019 in cash compensation and Mr. Sapirstein earned $58,207 in 2019 through the date of his resignation from the Board. Such amounts have not yet been paid.

Non-Employee Director Compensation for 2019

The policy requires directors to acquire and maintain ownership of at least 30,000 sharesfollowing table shows the compensation accrued by the non-employee members of our common stock beforeBoard for the year ended December 16, 2007, or within three years31, 2019. Directors who are also employees/officers of commencement of servicethe Company did not receive any additional compensation for services as a director, whichever is later. Thereafter, the policy providesdirector.

Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) ($)  Total ($) 
James Sapirstein  58,207   58,207 
Kathryn MacFarlane  60,000   60,000 

Changes to Non-Employee Director Compensation for the withholding of fees until the ownership level has been achieved by such director. 2020

The Board, of Directors has determined that all directors serving us have met the minimum share ownership requirement.

During 2009, each non-employee director was entitled to receive $4,000 at each in-person Board of Directors meeting attended and $2,000 for each related Board of Directors meeting attended by telephone. Beginning in February 2009, the Board of Directors waived the fees related to its telephonic meetings in an effort to conserve our financial resources. In May 2010, the Board reinstated the fees for Board of Directors meetings attended by telephone.

Also, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee,acting as the Governance and NominationsNominating Committee, did not change or adjust any components of director compensation during fiscal year 2020.

Executive Compensation

The following disclosure focuses on our named executive officers. For fiscal year 2019, our “named executive officers” consisted of: Arnold S. Lippa, Ph.D., Jeff E. Margolis, and Richard Purcell. Timothy Jones was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer effective May 6, 2020, and David Dickason was appointed Senior Vice President Pre-clinical Product Development effective September 15, 2020, in each case after the Research and Development Committee is entitled to receive $2,000 for each committee meeting attended and other membersend of the respective committees are entitled to receive $1,000most recent fiscal year, and as such, information on compensation of Mr. Jones and Mr. Dickason is not reflected in “—Summary Compensation Table for each committee meeting attended. The Chairman of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive $3,000 for each committee meeting attended and the remaining members of the Audit Committee are entitled to receive $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. In September 2009, the Board of Directors deferred payment of its committee fees in an effort to conserve our financial resources. In May 2010, the Board reinstated the payment of committee fees.

Each non-employee director is automatically granted options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock upon commencement of service as a director. Additionally, each non-employee director is granted options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock on the date of the first meeting of the Board of Directors for the relative calendar year. These nonqualified options described above each have an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, have a ten-year term and vest in equal increments of 33 1/3% on each anniversary date of the dates of grant, and are otherwise subject to the terms and provisions of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.

The above cash compensation and nonqualified option grant provisions do not apply to non-employee directors who serve on the Board of Directors to oversee an investment in us. Compensation for such non-employee directors, if appropriate, is determined separately. As of2019” or “—Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2010, none of our directors served on the Board of Directors in such capacity.2019” below.

Director Summary Compensation Table for 2019

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by each of the non-employee directorsnamed executive officers for the fiscal yearyears ended December 31, 2010. Directors who are also our employees did2019 and 2018. The information contained under the heading “Stock Awards” for all named executive officers includes the estimated value of equity awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and does not receive any additional compensation for services as a director.reflect actual cash payments or actual dollars awarded.:

 

Name

  Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash

($)
   Option  Awards
($)(1)
  All Other
Compensation

($)(2)
   Total
($)
 

Robert F. Allnutt

  $18,000    $4,122(3)   —      $22,122  

John F. Benedik, CPA

  $22,000    $4,122(4)   —      $26,122  

Charles J. Casamento

  $20,000    $4,122(5)   —      $24,122  

Carl W. Cotman, Ph.D.

  $16,000    $4,122(6)   —      $20,122  

Peter F. Drake, Ph.D.

  $12,000    $4,122(7)   —      $16,122  

M. Ross Johnson, Ph.D.

  $18,000    $4,122(8)   —      $22,122  
Name and principal position Fiscal Year(1) Salary ($)  All Other Compensation
($) (2)
  Total ($) 
Arnold S. Lippa, Ph.D. 2019  339,600   -   339,600 
Interim President, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman and Chief Scientific Officer(3) 2018  339,600   -   339,600 
Jeff E. Margolis 2019  321,600   -   321,600 
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary 2018  321,600   -   321,600 
Richard Purcell 2019  150,000   49,863   199,863 
Senior Vice President of Research and Development 2018  150,000   17,682   167,682 

 

(1)

Amounts representThe 2019 and 2018 salary amounts in the aggregate grant date estimated fair value of thetable above reflect contractual salary amounts plus employee benefits. There were no bonuses, stock or stock option awards usingor other compensation during the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions used inyears ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Mr. Purcell has been the calculationSenior Vice President of these amounts includeResearch and Development for the Company since October 15, 2014 and provides services to the Company on a weighted-average risk free interestmonth-to-month basis through DNA Healthlink, Inc. at the rate of 3.2%; .a dividend yield of 0%; a weighted average life of 6.9 years and a volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 108%.

$12,500 per month.
(2)

In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules, “All Other“Other Annual Compensation” in the form of perquisites and other personal benefits has been omitted where the aggregate amount of such perquisites and other personal benefits was less than $10,000. The amountsamount reflected in this column represent fees paid to such directors in their capacities as consultants to us.

for Richard Purcell is the amount of interest charged by DNA Healthlink, Inc. for delayed payment of invoices.
(3)

Mr. Allnutt had an aggregateEffective May 6, 2020, with the appointment of 300,000 option awards outstandingTimothy Jones as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Lippa resigned the interim officer positions of December 31, 2010.

(4)

Mr. Benedik had an aggregateInterim Chief Executive Officer and Interim President, positions that Dr. Lippa assumed on October 12, 2018 after the resignation of 175,000 option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

(5)

Mr. Casamento had an aggregate of 315,000 option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

(6)

Dr. Cotman had an aggregate of 260,000 option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

(7)

Dr. Drake had an aggregate of 250,000 option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

(8)

Dr. Johnson had an aggregate of 320,000 option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

James Manuso on September 30, 2018.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSIn 2019 and 2018, no cash bonuses (performance or otherwise), stock awards or option awards were awarded. See “—Significant Agreements and Contracts—Employment Agreements” in Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies to notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) of the Company as of June 30, 2020, above, and “—Employment Agreements” below for information on about the compensation terms under the employment agreements of Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis.

Except

In connection with the recent changes to our board membership and taking into account the Company’s current operating structure and business plans, management is currently reevaluating the compensation policies of the Company and, as set forth below,a result of that reassessment and in light of the Company’s current financial circumstances, has made departures from the Company’s historic compensation policies and will likely make substantial adjustments to such policies, including the termination of such policies, in the future.

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2019

The following table shows information concerning outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2019, made by the Company to its named executive officers.

  Option Awards
Name Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable  Option exercise
price ($)
  Option
expiration Date
Arnold S. Lippa  46,154   8.125  6/30/22
   30,769   6.396  8/18/22
   73,847   7.3775  3/31/21
   50,000   3.90  1/17/22
   50,000   2.00  6/30/22
   559,595   1.45  12/9/27
Jeff E. Margolis  46,154   8.125  6/30/22
   30,769   6.396  8/18/22
   73,847   7.3775  3/31/21
   50,000   3.90  1/17/22
   50,000   2.00  6/30/22
   25,000   2.00  7/26/22
   388,687   1.45  12/9/27
Richard Purcell  6,154   8.125  6/30/22
   9,231   6.396  8/18/22
   61,359   7.3775  3/31/21
   40,000   3.90  1/17/22
   40,000   2.00  6/30/22
   100,000   1.45  12/9/27

At December 31, 2019, there were no disclosable transactions1,731,746 options outstanding to named executive officers all of which had vested.

Employment Agreements

Two of the Company’s named executive officers, Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis, entered into employment agreements with related persons under Item 404the Company on August 18, 2015. Upon entering into such agreements, the Company disclosed these agreements and filed them as exhibits on a Current Report on Form 8-K on August 19, 2015. The employment agreements that would have terminated on September 30, 2018 for the two named executive officers above were automatically extended for periods of Regulation S-K duringone year pursuant to the terms of such agreements on September 30, 2018 and 2019.

One of the Company’s executive officers, Timothy Jones (together with Arnold S. Lippa Ph.D. and Jeff E. Margolis, the “Executives”), entered into an employment agreement with the Company on May 6, 2020, which was amended on July 31, 2020. Upon entering into this agreement, the Company disclosed this agreement and filed it as an exhibit on a Current Report on Form 8-K on May 6, 2020. Upon entering into the amendment to the agreement, the Company disclosed this amendment and filed it as an exhibit on a Current Report on Form 8-K on August 3, 2020. Mr. Jones was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer effective May 6, 2020, after the end of the most recent fiscal year, endedand as such, information on compensation of Mr. Jones is not reflected in “—Summary Compensation Table for 2019” or “—Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20092019” above.

Following is a summary of the arrangements that provide for payment to the Executive at, following or currently proposed.

in connection with any termination, including resignation, retirement or other termination, or in connection with a change of control or a change in the Executive’s responsibilities following a change in control.

In March 2009, our executive officers and other key personnel entered into retention bonusEach of the Executive employment agreements to fosterprovide that if the continuous employmentExecutive is terminated by the Company for cause, or by the Executive without good reason, or as a result of such individuals. Under such agreements, each executive officer willdeath or disability, Executive (or his estate) would be entitled to receive (i) any base salary earned but not paid through the date of such termination, paid on the next regularly scheduled payroll date following such termination and (ii) all other benefits, if any, due Executive, as determined in accordance with the plans, policies and practices of the Company. There are currently no plans policies or practices of the Company under clause (ii) of the prior sentence that would provide any additional benefits.

Each of the Executive employment agreements provide that if the Executive is terminated by the Company without cause, or by the Executive for good reason, the Executive Officer would be entitled to (i) a lump sum cash bonuspayment equal to six (6)twelve months of the executive’sExecutive’s then current base salary and (ii) full acceleration of the vesting of any then unvested stock options or other equity compensation awards held by the Executive (with any unvested performance-based awards accelerated at 100% of target performance levels).

If the Executive were to breach any of section of the employment agreement related to confidentiality, inventions or restrictive covenants, or the Company determines that Executive engaged in an act or omission that, if discovered during Executive’s employment, would have entitled the Company to terminate Executive’s employment hereunder for Cause, the Executive would forfeit the right to any unpaid severance and any unexercised options.

As used in the eventemployment agreements, “cause” means (i) any act of personal dishonesty taken by the Executive in connection with his employment hereunder, (ii) the Executive’s conviction or plea of nolo contendere to a felony, (iii) any act by the Executive that constitutes material misconduct and is injurious to the Company, (iv) continued violations by the Executive of the Executive’s obligations to the Company, (v) material breach of the employment agreement, (vi) commission of any act of serious moral turpitude, or (vii) material failure to comply with the lawful direction of the Board. As used in the employment agreements, “for good reason” means without Executive’s express written consent (i) a material diminution of Executive’s duties, position or responsibilities relative to Executive’s duties, position or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to such reduction; (ii) a material diminution by the Company of Executive’s base salary as in effect immediately prior to such reduction, other than a general reduction in base salary that affects all of the Company’s executive officers; (iii) any material breach by the Company of the employment agreement; or (iv) the relocation of Executive to a facility or a location more than fifty (50) miles from the current location of the Executive’s principal office, which the Company and Executive agree would constitute a material change in control, as defined in our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, occurs and the geographic location at which Executive must perform services to the Company.

The Company entered into an agreement with DNA Healthlink, Inc. effective on October 15, 2014 pursuant to which Richard Purcell, the third named executive remains continuously employed with us, our successor or, if applicable, the ultimate parent of any such successor (collectively referred toofficer, serves as the Surviving Entity), or any subsidiary thereof, throughCompany’s Senior Vice President of Research and Development on a month-to-month basis at the date occurring three (3) months post-changerate of control, or such shorter period as deemed necessary by the Surviving Entity (referred$12,500 per month.

The Company entered into a consulting contract with David Dickason effective September 15, 2020 pursuant to which Mr. Dickason serves as the Payment Date), to allow forCompany’s Senior Vice President of Pre-Clinical Product Development on an orderly transitionat - will basis at the rate of personnel and information and to allow for an appropriate integration process, as needed. The amount$250 per hour. Mr. Dickason was appointed Senior Vice President of Pre-Clinical Product Development after the end of the bonusmost recent fiscal year, and as such, information on compensation of Mr. Dickason is not reflected in “—Summary Compensation Table for executive officers, based on base salaries2019” or “—Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2019” above.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

Director Independence

As noted above, as of December 31, 2019, all of the functions of the Audit, Compensation and Governance and Nominations Committees were being performed by the full Board. As of September 30, 2020, Kathryn MacFarlane, PharmD. was an “independent director”, as that term is defined under Section 803 of the NYSE Amex Company Guide. As of September 30, 2020, Dr. Lippa, Mr. Margolis, and Mr. Jones were not “independent directors” as defined above.

Transactions with Related Persons

On September 30, 2020, the Company entered into Exchange Agreements with Mr. Margolis, Dr. Lippa, Mr. Jones and two vendors, one of which is considered a related party, that being Marc M. Radin PC whereby each of Mr. Margolis, Dr. Lippa and Mr. Jones forgave $150,000, $100,000 and $28,218 of accrued compensation , respectively, and, in the case of Marc M Radin, PC, $135,659.48 of accounts payable was settled with 150, 100, 28.218 and 135.65948 shares of Series H Preferred Stock, respectively. Mr. Margolis and Dr. Lippa transferred such shares to family trusts which trusts converted such Series H Preferred Stock to Common Stock and warrants to purchase Common Stock. Mr. Jones converted his Series H Preferred Stock to Common Stock and warrants to purchase Common Stock. Marc M. Radin PC designated Marc M. Radin individually to be the recipient of its Series H Preferred Stock. Mr. Radin converted his Series H Preferred Stock to Common Stock and warrants to purchase Common Stock. For a more detailed description of the Series H issuances and conversion, see the section entitled “Recent Developments” in the “Prospectus Summary.”

On July 13, 2020, the Company entered into two Exchange Agreements with Mr. Margolis and Dr. Lippa in which they exchanged their right to receive accrued compensation in the aggregate of $1,100,000 for shares of Series H Preferred Stock. See “—Compensation Forgiveness by Arnold S. Lippa and Jeff Margolis and Related Issuance of Series H Preferred Stock” in Note 9. Subsequent Events to notes to condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of June 30, 2020 for information on these exchanges.

On March 22, 2020, Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis each forgave $153,000 of accrued compensation, for an aggregate of $306,000 of accrued compensation, and received an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

During fiscal year 2019, Dr. Lippa advanced on an interest free basis the Company $38,000 of which $13,000 was repaid to Dr. Lippa. The outstanding balance of the advance is payable on demand. For fiscal year 2019, $10,272 was charged to interest expense with respect to promissory notes issued by the Company in favor of Dr. Lippa.

Dr. Lippa has extended credit to the Company on April 15, 2019 for operating expenses by making a payment of $25,000 to the Company’s auditors which amount has been accounted for by the Company as an advance by Dr. Lippa payable on demand. The balance of the amount payable to the auditors has been paid directly by the Company.

During fiscal year 2019, the Company repaid $1,000 to Jeff Margolis related to $6,500 of interest free advances Mr. Margolis made to the Company during fiscal year 2018. The outstanding balance of the advance is payable on demand.

For the fiscal year 2019, $15,416 was charged to interest expense with respect to promissory notes issued by the Company in favor of Dr. James S. Manuso. As of September 30, 2018, Dr. James S. Manuso resigned his executive officer positions and as a member of the Board. All of the interest expense noted above for 2019 was incurred while Dr. Manuso was no longer an officer.

Dr. Lippa has extended credit to the Company on April 15, 2019 for operating expenses by making a payment of $25,000 to the Company’s auditors which amount has been accounted for by the Company as an interest free advance by Dr. Lippa payable on demand. The balance of the amount payable to the auditors has been paid directly by the Company.

On September 4, 2018, the Company entered into the Purisys Agreement. See “Information with Respect to our Company—Description of Business—Manufacturing” for information on the Purisys Agreement. On January 28, 2020, Mr. Timothy Jones was appointed to the Board to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Mr. James Sapirstein. Until April 9, 2020, Mr. Jones was the vice president global pharmaceutical and medical OTC at Purisys. Mr. Jones received approval to join the Board of the Company from Purisys subject to (i) Mr. Jones’ recusal from Company discussions about Noramco or Purisys, and (ii) Mr. Jones’ relinquishment of responsibility of the Company’s account representation to the chief executive officer and president of Purisys. As of April 9, 2020, Mr. Jones was no longer employed by and has accepted a severance package from Purisys. Periodically, Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis make short term advances to the Company or are repaid advances previously made. As of December 31, 2018, December 31, 2019 and June 30, 2010, the amount due to Dr. Lippa was $18,648. As of December 31, 2018, December 31, 2019 and June 30, 2020, amounts due to Mr. Margolis were $5,500, $5,500 and 6,500 respectively.  Short term advances are repaid without interest. On April 22, 2020, advances to the Company made by Mr. Margolis were repaid to Mr. Margolis, the total repayment being $10,775.

On April 9, 2018, Dr. Lippa and Dr. James S. Manuso, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board, advanced $50,000 each, for a total of $100,000, to the Company for working capital purposes. Each note was payable on demand after June 30, 2018. Each note was subject to a mandatory exchange provision that provided that the principal amount of the note would be as follows: Dr. Stoll - $185,000, Dr. Varney - $181,000, Ms. Messinger - $121,500, Mr. Coleman - $125,000 and Dr. Johnson - $110,500. The retention bonus agreements provide thatmandatorily exchanged into a board approved offering of the bonus shall be payable by the Surviving EntityCompany’s securities, if such offering held its first closing on or as soon as practicable followingbefore June 30, 2018 and the Payment Date,amount of proceeds from such first closing was at least $150,000, not including the principal amounts of the notes that would be exchanged, or $250,000 including the principal amounts of such notes. Upon such exchange, the notes would be deemed repaid and terminated. Any accrued but no later than 15 days thereafter, and shallunpaid interest outstanding at the time of such exchange will be determined without regard to any reduction of base salary applicable to our executives subsequent to March 13, 2009 and prior to a change in control. In the event that the executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Surviving Entity or a subsidiary thereof after a change in control and prior(i) repaid to the Payment Date,note holder or (ii) invested in certain circumstances where the termination is without causeoffering, at the note holder’s election. A first closing did not occur on or for good reason,before June 30, 2018. Dr. Lippa agreed to exchange his note into the bonus shall be payable byboard approved offering that had its initial closing on September 12, 2018. Accrued interest on Dr. Lippa’s note was not exchanged. As of September 30, 2020, Dr. James S. Manuso had not exchanged his note. For the Surviving Entityfiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, $11,268 and $7,760 was charged to interest expense with respect to Dr. Lippa’s notes, respectively. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, $12,769 and $7,760 was charged to interest expense with respect to Dr. James S. Manuso’s notes, respectively. As of September 30, 2018, Dr. James S. Manuso resigned his executive officer positions and as soon as practicable following the date of terminationa member of the executive officer’s employment (butBoard. Of the $12,769 of interest expense noted above, $3,564 was incurred while Dr. Manuso was no later than sixty (60) days thereafter)longer an officer.

In connection with a 2017 Unit Offering, Aurora Capital LLC (“Aurora”) served as a placement agent and earned $20,000 fees and 8,000 placement agent common stock warrants. All but $5,000 of these fees were unpaid as of September 30, 2020 and have been accrued in accounts payable and accrued expenses and charged against additional paid-in capital as of September 30, 2020. The placement agent common stock warrants were valued at $27,648 and were accounted for in additional paid-in capital as of March 31, 2017 which value has not been adjusted through September 30, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, a total of $105,000 was due to Aurora, of which an aggregate of $5,000 was paid on August 5th and August 6th, subject to the executive officer executing and not revoking a general release2020.

Security Ownership of all claims against the Surviving Entity in a form acceptable to the Surviving Entity within sixty (60) days following such termination of employment.

Certain Beneficial Owners AND Management

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth to our knowledge, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stockthe Company’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2010,September 30, 2020, the latest date practicable for the preparation of this table, by (i) each person known by usthe Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock,Common Stock, (ii) each of ourthe Company’s directors and nominees,as of September 30, 2020, (iii) each of the Company’s named executive officers, in the Summary Compensation Table and (iv) all of ourthe Company’s executive officers and directors as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believethe Company believes that the persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stockCommon Stock indicated. In computing the number and percentage ownership of shares beneficially owned by a person, shares of Common Stock that a person has a right to acquire within sixty (60) days of September 30, 2020, pursuant to options, warrants or other rights are considered as outstanding, while these shares are not considered as outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person or group.

  Shares Beneficially Owned 
Directors, Officers and 5% Stockholders Number  Percentage 
       
Arnold Lippa Family Trust of 2007  225,213,997(a)  32.71%
         
Jeff Margolis Trusts  209,026,631(b)  30.72%
         
Directors and Officers:        
         
Jeff E. Margolis  209,026,631(b)  30.72%
         
Arnold S. Lippa, Ph.D.  1,416(c)  0.00%
         
Timothy Jones  25,818,126(d)  4.31%
         
Kathryn MacFarlane  12,640,421(e)  2.14%
         
Richard Purcell  5,263,077(f)  0.90%
         
David Dickason  2,000,000(g)  0.34%
         
All directors and current executive officers as a group (6 persons)  254,749,671   50.03%

 

(a)

All of these holdings were acquired by Dr. Arnold Lippa and subsequently transferred to the Trust, or are held by an entity owned by the Trust. Dr. Lippa is neither the trustee nor the beneficiary of the Trust. Linda Lippa, his wife, is a beneficiary of the Trust. Included in the total are 109,786,458 warrants to purchase an equal number of shares of common stock ignoring any blocker provisions that may prevent exercise, resulting from the conversion of the trust’s Series H Preferred Stock options to acquire an additional 810,365 shares of Common Stock.

Directors, Officers(b)

All of these holdings were acquired by Mr. Margolis and 5% Stockholders(1)

Shares
Beneficially Owned(2)
Percentsubsequently transferred to six family trusts. Mr. Margolis’ wife is the trustee of three trusts. Mr. Margolis is the trustee of three trusts. Mr. Margolis is not a beneficiary of any of the trusts for which his wife is trustee. Mr. Margolis is the beneficiary of one trust of which he is also the trustee. The one trust of which Mr. Margolis is both the beneficiary and the trustee owns 3,076 shares of common stock and 43,076 options. All other shares of common stock, options warrants are owned by one or more of the other five trusts. In the aggregate, the holdings of the trusts include: (i) 106,451,947 shares of Common Stock,
Beneficially Owned(2)

Robert F. Allnutt

295,500(3)*

John F. Benedik

135,000(4)*

Charles J. Casamento

260,000(5)*

James H. Coleman

1,017,184(6)  1.3

Carl W. Cotman, Ph.D.

264,500(7)*

Peter F. Drake, Ph.D.

230,000(8)*

M. Ross Johnson, Ph.D.

280,000(9)*

Steven A. Johnson, Ph.D.

648,096(10)*

Maria S. Messinger, CPA

779,885(11)*

Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.

2,859,879(12)  3.5

Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.

1,559,334(13)  1.9

All executive officers and directors (ii) options to acquire an additional 664,457 shares of Common Stock, (iii) warrants exercisable into 101,905,382 shares of Common Stock , resulting from the conversion of the trusts’ Series H Preferred Stock on September 30, 2020 (iv) the 4,845 warrants to purchase shares of common received as an owner of Aurora Capital LLC from the warrants Aurora received as a group (11 persons)

8,329,378(14)  9.6

Samyang Optics Co., Ltd.

14,527,212(15)17.5

*Less than one percentplacement agent in the sale of the Company’s Common Stock and Warrant Financing.
(1)(c)

ExceptDr. Lippa’s holdings include: (i) 598 shares of Common Stock, and (ii) 818 warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock. In addition, Dr. Lippa no longer beneficially owns many of the shares of the Company that were initially awarded to him because he has transferred these shares into family trusts, of which he is neither the trustee nor the beneficiary, including the Arnold Lippa Family Trust of 2007 as otherwise indicated,noted in footnote (a) above. In addition, Dr. Lippa has been awarded options to acquire an additional 15,385 shares of Common Stock which have been assigned to another family trust for the addressbenefit of such beneficial ownerother family members. Dr. Lippa is atneither the Company’s principal executive offices, 15231 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, California 92618.

trustee nor the beneficiary of that trust.
(2)(d)

Applicable percentage of ownership at December 31, 2010 is based upon 78,858,197Timothy Jones was appointed to the Board on January 28, 2020. Mr. Jones was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer on May 6, 2020. Mr. Jones owns 4,409,063 shares of common stock outstanding. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance withCommon Stock resulting from the rulesconversion of the SecuritiesMr. Jones’ Series H Preferred Stock and Exchange Commission and includes voting and investment power with respect toalso owns options exercisable into 17,000,000 shares shown as beneficially owned. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2010 are deemed outstanding for computing the shares and percentage ownership of the person holding such options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person or entity.

Common Stock.
(3)(e)

Includes 230,000Dr. MacFarlane’s holdings include: (i) 6,154 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of Common Stock, and (ii) options within 60 daysto purchase 12,634,267 shares of December 31, 2010.

Common Stock.
(4)(f)

Includes 105,000Mr. Purcell’s holdings include: (i) 6,154 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of Common Stock, and (ii) options within 60 daysto purchase 5,256,923 shares of December 31, 2010.

Common Stock.
(5)(g)

Includes 245,000Mr. Dickason’s holdings include options to purchase 2,000,000 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010. Excludes 17,653 shares held by Mr. Casamento in a trust over which he does not exercise control.

(6)

Includes 809,597 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010. Beneficial ownership of these shares is shared and held by the James Henry and Nancy Irene Coleman III Revocable Trust.

(7)

Includes 190,000 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

(8)

Includes 180,000 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

(9)

Includes 250,000 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

(10)

Includes 617,334 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

(11)

Includes 730,821 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

(12)

Includes 2,759,879 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

(13)

Includes 1,529,334 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

(14)

Includes 7,646,965 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

(15)

Includes 4,081,633 shares that may be purchase upon exercise of warrants within 60 days of December 31, 2010.

Common Stock.

We are

The Company is not aware of any arrangements that may at a subsequent date result in us being subject to a change of control.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES WE ARE OFFERING

In this offering, we are offering a maximum ofunits, each consisting ofshares of common stock andwarrants to purchaseshares of common stock. This prospectus also relates to the offering of shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued to the investors in this offering.

The units consisting of shares of our common stock, warrants convertible into shares of common stock and the common stock issuable upon exercisecontrol of the warrants, and the placement agent warrants and shares ofCompany.

Where You Can Find More Information

We are not required to deliver an annual report to our common stock issuable upon exercise of the placement agent warrants,stockholders unless our directors are collectively referred to herein as the securities.

General Background

Our authorized capital stock currently consists of 205,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.

Common Stock

As of December 31, 2010, we had issued and outstanding 78,858,197 shares of common stock, held by 402 stockholders of record. In addition, as of September 30, 2010, we had outstanding options to acquire 12,883,089 shares of common stock, outstanding warrants to acquire 24,126,952 shares of common stock and Series B convertible preferred stock convertible into 3,679 shares of common stock.

Except as required by law, holders of our common stock are entitled to vote on all matters as a single class, and each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock owned. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably any dividends that may be declared by the board of directors out of legally available funds, subject to any preferential dividend rights of any outstanding preferred stock. Upon any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any outstanding preferred stock.

Holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. Our outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of holders of shares of any series of preferred stock which we may designate and issue in the future.

Our common stock is not currently traded on any national securities exchange and instead is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “CORX.OB.”

Stockholder Rights Plan

On February 5, 2002, our board of directors approved the adoption of a stockholder rights plan and declared a divided distribution of one right for each outstanding share of our common stock on February 15, 2002. Each share of our common stock presently issued and outstanding includes one right and each share of our common stock that may be issued after the date hereof will also include one right. The rights automatically attach to outstanding shares of our common stock and no separate certificates are issued. The rights trade only together with shares of our common stock.

Each right allows its holder to purchase a unit consisting of one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A junior participating preferred stockelected at a purchase price of $75.00 per unit, subject to adjustment. The rights are not currently exercisable, but will become exercisable upon the earlier of (i) 10 days following a public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock or (ii) 10 business days following the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in a person or group beneficially owning 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. Once the rights become exercisable, each holder of a right may purchase shares of our common stock, or, under certain circumstances, shares of the common stock of the acquiring person or group, having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the right.

Our board of directors may redeem the rights in whole, at a redemption price of $0.001 per right, at any time until 10 days following the acquisition of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock by a person or group. Unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by us, the rights will expire on February 15, 2012.

Warrants

The following is a brief summary of the material terms and provisions of the warrants issuable in this offering. The summary of the warrants is subject to and qualified in its entirety by the form of warrant. We urge you to review the form of warrant, which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part with the SEC in connection with this offering, for a complete description of the terms and conditions applicable to the warrants. This prospectus also relates to the shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise, if any, of the warrants issued to the investors in this offering.

Each purchaser of units will receive, for each unit purchased, _____ shares of our common stock and _____ warrants representing the right to purchase _____ shares of common stock at an exercise price of $_____ per share. The warrants are exercisable on or after the date of issuance and will expire on the ______ anniversary of the date the warrants are issued. The exercise price is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits, reorganizations or similar events affecting our common stock and the exercise price and number of warrants held by a purchaser (or such purchaser’s direct or indirect transferee) are subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of cash dividends or other distributions to holders of shares of our common stock.

There is no established public trading market for the warrants, and we do not expect a market to develop. We do not intend to apply to list the warrants on any securities exchange. Without an active market, the liquidity of the warrants will be limited. In addition, in the event our common stock price does not exceed the per share exercise price of the warrants during the period when the warrants are exercisable, the warrants will not have any value.

Holders of the warrants may exercise their warrants to purchase shares of our common stock on or before the expiration date by delivering an exercise notice, appropriately completed and duly signed, and payment of the exercise price for the number of shares for which the warrant is being exercised. In the event that the registration statement relating to the shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not effective and another exemption from registration is not available, a holder of warrants will have the right, in its sole discretion, to exercise its warrants for a net number of warrant shares pursuant to the cashless exercise procedures specified in the warrants. Warrants may be exercised in whole or in part, and any portion of a warrant not exercised prior to the expiration date shall be and become void and of no value. The absence of an effective registration statement or applicable exemption from registration does not alleviate our obligation to deliver common stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant.

Upon the holder’s exercise of a warrant, we will issue the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant within three trading days of our receipt of notice of exercise and payment of the aggregate exercise price, subject to surrender of the warrant.

The shares of common stock issuable on exercise of the warrants will be, when issued in accordance with the warrants, duly and validly authorized, issued and fully paid and non-assessable. We will authorize and reserve at least that number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of all outstanding warrants.

The exercisability of the warrants may be limited in certain circumstances if, upon exercise, the holder (together with the holder’s affiliates and any other persons or entities acting together with the holder as a group) would hold more than 4.99% of our total common stock issued and outstanding. The holder of the warrant has the ability, upon providing us not less than 61 days’ prior written notice, to increase or decrease the foregoing percentage, provided that the percentage cannot at any time exceed 9.99%. The absence of an effective registration statement relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant will not provide the holder with the right to net-settle the warrant in cash.

Amendments and waivers of the terms of the warrants require the written consent of the holders of warrants representing at least a majority of the shares issuable upon the then outstanding warrants, except that no such action may increase the exercise price of a warrant or decrease the number of shares or class of stock obtainable upon exercise of a warrant without the written consent of the holder. No amendment will be effective unless it applies to all of the warrants then outstanding.

THE HOLDER OF A WARRANT WILL NOT POSSESS ANY RIGHTS AS A STOCKHOLDER UNDER THAT WARRANT UNTIL THE HOLDER EXERCISES THE WARRANT. THE WARRANTS MAY BE TRANSFERRED INDEPENDENT OF THE COMMON STOCK WITH WHICH THEY WERE ISSUED, SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE LAWS

Anti-takeover Effects of Provisions of Delaware Law and our Charter

Certain provisions of our second restated certificate of incorporation may make it more difficult to acquire control of us by various means. These provisions could deprive our stockholders of opportunities to realize a premium on the shares of common stock owned by them. In addition, these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our stock. These provisions are intended to:

enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of the board and in the policies formulated by the board;

discourage certain types of transactions which may involve an actual or threatened change in control of Cortex Pharmaceuticals;

discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights;

encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to consult first with the board of directors to negotiate the terms of any proposed business combination or offer; and

reduce our vulnerability to an unsolicited proposal for a takeover that does not contemplate the acquisition of all our outstanding shares or that is otherwise unfair to our stockholders.

Our second restated certificate of incorporation provides that special meetingsmeeting of our stockholders may be called onlyor by the boardwritten consents of our stockholders. If our directors or an officer authorized by it to do so. This limitation on the right of stockholders to call a special meeting could make it more difficult for stockholders to initiate actions that are opposed by the board of directors. These actions could include the removal of an incumbent director or the election of a stockholder nominee as a director. They could also include the implementation of a rule requiring stockholder ratification of specific defensive strategies that have been adopted by the board of directors with respect to unsolicited takeover bids. In addition, the limited ability of the stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders may make it more difficult to change the existing board and management.

Our authorized but unissued shares of common stocknot elected in such manner, we are available for future issuance without stockholder approval. These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

The Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, provides generally that the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote isnot required to amend a corporation’s certificate of incorporation.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

The DGCL permits a corporation to indemnify its current and former directors and officers against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in connection with a legal proceeding. To be indemnified, the person must have acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in, and not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation. With respect to any criminal action or proceeding, the person must not have had reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful.

The DGCL permits a present or former director or officer of a corporation to be indemnified against certain expenses if the person has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in defense of any proceeding brought against such person by virtue of the fact that such person is or wasdeliver an officer or director of the corporation. In addition, the DGCL permits the advancement of expenses relating to the defense of any proceeding to directors and officers contingent upon the person’s commitment to repay advances for expenses against such person is not ultimately entitled to be indemnified.

The DGCL provides that the indemnification provisions contained in the DGCL are not exclusive of any other right that a person seeking indemnification may have or later acquire under any provision of a corporation’s by-laws, by any agreement, by any vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. Furthermore, the DGCL provides that a corporation may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect its directors and officers against any expense, liability or loss, regardless of whether the corporation has the power to indemnify such persons under the DGCL.

Our second restated certificate of incorporation provides that, to the extent permitted by the DGCL, we will indemnify our current and former directors and officers against all expenses actually and reasonably incurred by them as a result of their being threatened with or otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding by virtue of the fact that they are or were one of our officers or directors.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permittedannual report to our directorsstockholders and officers, we have been advised that, although the validity and scope of the governing statute havewill not been tested in court, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In addition, indemnification may be limited by state securities laws.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

, which we refer to as the placement agent, has agreed to act as the exclusive placement agent in connection with this offering subject to the terms and conditions of a placement agency agreement, which we will enter into prior to the closing of the offering. The placement agent may engage selected dealers to assist in the placement of the securities. The placement agent is not purchasing or selling any securities offered by this prospectus, nor is it required to arrange the purchase or sale of any specific number or dollar amount of the securities, but has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to arrange for the sale of all of the securities offered hereby. We will enter into purchase agreements directly with investors in connection with this offering and we may not sell the entire amount of securities offered pursuant to this prospectus. The price per securities has been determined based upon arm’s-length negotiations between the purchasers and us.

The placement agent proposes to arrange for the sale to one or more purchasers of the securities offered pursuant to this prospectus through direct purchase agreements between the purchasers and us.

Commissions and Expenses

We have agreed to pay the placement agent a fee equal topercent in cash pluspercent in form of warrants of the gross proceeds from the sale of securities in this offering, excluding any proceeds received by us after the consummation of the offering upon the exercise of any warrants or similar rights.

The following table shows the per unit and total cash placement agent’s fees we will pay to the placement agent in connection with the sale of the units offered pursuant to this prospectus assuming the purchase of all of the units offered hereby:voluntarily send an annual report.

 

Per Unit

$

Total

$

In addition, we have agreed to issue to the placement agent, or its designees, warrants exercisable for an aggregate ofpercent of the gross proceeds received from the securities sold in this offering. The placement agent warrants will be exercisable at any time beginning on the date that is six months from the date hereof until 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on the date that isyears following the date hereof at an exercise price of $per share. This prospectus also covers the sale of the placement agent warrants and the shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the placement agent warrants. As required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA, neither the placement agent warrants nor any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the placement agent warrants may be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, or hypothecated, or be the subject of any hedging, short sale, derivative, put, or call transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of such securities by any person for a period of 180 days immediately following the date hereof, except the transfer of any security:

by operation of law or by reason of our reorganization;

to any FINRA member firm participating in the offering and the officers or partners thereof, if all securities so transferred remain subject to the lock-up restriction described above for the remainder of the time period;

if the aggregate amount of our securities held by the placement agent or related person do not exceed 1% of the securities being offered;

that is beneficially owned on a pro-rata basis by all equity owners of an investment fund, provided that no participating member manages or otherwise directs investments by the fund, and participating members in the aggregate do not own more than 10% of the equity in the fund; or

the exercise or conversion of any security, if all securities received remain subject to the lock-up restriction set forth above for the remainder of the time period.

Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to closing in this offering, the actual total offering commissions, if any, are not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the maximum amount set forth above. We have also agreed to reimburse the placement agent for its out-of-pocket expenses in an aggregate amount not to exceed $35,000.

Our obligation to issue and sell securities to the purchasers is subject to the conditions set forth in the purchase agreements, which may be waived by us at our discretion. A purchaser’s obligation to purchase securities is subject to the conditions set forth in his or her purchase agreement as well, which may also be waived.

We currently anticipate that the sale of the units will be completed on or about, 2011. We estimate the total offering expenses of this offering that will be payable by us, excluding the placement agent’s fee, will be approximately $, which includes legal and printing costs, various other fees and reimbursement of the placements agent’s expenses. At the closing, The Depository Trust Company will credit the shares of common stock to the respective accounts of the investors.

Indemnification

We have agreed to indemnify the placement agent against liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We have also agreed to contribute to payments the placement agent may be required to make in respect of such liabilities.

Lock-up Agreements

Wefile annual, quarterly and our officers and directors have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, for a period of 30 days after the date of this prospectus, not to offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, grant any option to purchase, make any short sale or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly any common shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common shares either owned as of the date hereof or thereafter acquired without the prior written consent of the placement agent. This 30-day period may be extended if (1) during the last 17 days of the 30-day period, we issue an earnings release or material news or a material event regarding us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the 30-day period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the 30-day period, then the period of such extension will be 18-days, beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or material event. If after any announcement described in clause (2) of the preceding sentence, we announce that we will not release earnings results during the 16-day period, the lock-up period shall expire the later of the expiration of the 30-day period and the end of any extension of such period made pursuant to clause (1) of the preceding sentence. The placement agent may, in its sole discretion and at any time or from time to time before the termination of the lock-up period, without notice, release all or any portion of the securities subject to lock-up agreements.

Electronic Distribution

This prospectus may be made available in electronic format on websites or through other online services maintained by the placement agent, or by an affiliate. Other than this prospectus in electronic format, the information on the placement agent’s website and any information contained in any other website maintained by the placement agent is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or the placement agent, and should not be relied upon by investors.

The foregoing does not purport to be a complete statement of the terms and conditions of the placement agency agreement and purchase agreements. A copy of the placement agency agreement and the form of purchase agreement with the investors are included as exhibits to our current report on Form 8-K that will be filed with the SEC. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” on page 63.

Regulation M Restrictions

The placement agent may be deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Section 2(a)(11) of the Securities Act, and any commissions received by it and any profit realized on the resale of the units sold by them while acting as principals might be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions under the Securities Act. As an underwriter, the placement agent would be required to comply with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limitation, Rule 415(a)(4) under the Securities Act and Rule 10b-5 and Regulation M under the Exchange Act. These rules and regulations may limit the timing of purchases and sales of our securities by the placement agent acting as a principal. Under these rules and regulations, the placement agent:

must not engage in any stabilization activity in connection with our securities; and

must not bid for or purchase any of our securities or attempt to induce any person to purchase any of our securities, other than as permitted under the Exchange Act, until it has completed its participation in the distribution.

Affiliations

The placement agent and its affiliates may provide various investment banking, financial advisory and other services to us and our affiliates for which services they have received, and may in the future receive, customary fees. In the course of their businesses, the placement agent and its affiliates may actively trade our securities or loans for their own account or for the accounts of customers, and, accordingly, the placement agent and its affiliates may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities or loans.

Notice to Investors in the United Kingdom

In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive, each referred to as a Relevant Member State, an offer to the public of any securities which are the subject of the offering contemplated by this prospectus may not be made in that Relevant Member State except that an offer to the public in that Relevant Member State of any such securities may be made at any time under the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive, if they have been implemented in that Relevant Member State:

(a) to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;

(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average of at least 250 employees during the last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than €43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more than €50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts;

(c) by the placement agent to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive); or

(d) in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, provided that no such offer of shares shall result in a requirement for the publication by the issuer or the placement agent of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer to the public” in relation to any security in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and any securities to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase such securities, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State and the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State.

The placement agent has represented, warranted and agreed that:

(a) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the FSMA)) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of any of our securities in circumstances in which section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the issuer; and

(b) it has complied with and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to our securities in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.

European Economic Area

In particular, this document does not constitute an approved prospectus in accordance with European Commission’s Regulation on Prospectuses no. 809/2004 and no such prospectus is to be prepared and approved in connection with this offering. Accordingly, in relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (being the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2003/71/EC and including any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State) (each, a Relevant Member State), with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the Relevant Implementation Date) an offer of securities to the public may not be made in that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to such securities which has been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that the placement agent may, with effect from and including the Relative Implementation Date, make an offer of securities to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:

to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;

to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average of at least 250 employees during the last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 euros; and (3) an annual net turnover of

more than 50,000,000 euros, as shown in the last annual or consolidated accounts; orin any other circumstances which do not require the publication by the issuer of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer of securities to the public” in relation to any common shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the securities to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe such securities, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State. For these purposes theare “securities.”

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the securities being offered hereby and certain other legal matters will be passed on by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California. Lowenstein Sandler, PC, Roseland, New Jersey, is representing the placement agent in this offering.

EXPERTS

Haskell & White LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which are included in this prospectus and registration statement. Our financial statements are included in reliance on Haskell & White LLP’s report, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC relating to the securities offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. We have omitted parts of the registration statement, as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. For further information with respect to us and the securities offered hereby, reference is made to such registration statement, exhibits and schedules.

We are subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and in accordance therewith file periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements, other information andfilings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

We have filed with the SEC a copy of the registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the securities offered under this prospectus. This prospectus, which forms a part of that registration statement, does not contain all information included in the registration statement. Certain information is omitted, and you should refer to the registration statement and its exhibits.

Our filings and the registration statement can also be reviewed by accessing the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be inspected by anyone without charge and copies ofchanged. The Selling Stockholder may not sell these materials may be obtained uponsecurities until the payment of the fees prescribed byregistration statement filed with the SEC atis effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the Public Reference Room maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The registration statement on Form S-1 and the periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and other information filed by us are also available through the Internet web site maintained by the SEC at the following address:http://www.sec.gov.

offer or sale is not permitted.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Audited Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheetsconsolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 20082019 and 2007

F-42018: 

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) from December 31, 2006 through December  31, 2009

F-5 

StatementsReport of Cash Flowsindependent registered public accounting firm

F-2
Consolidated balance sheetsF-3
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive lossF-4
Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equityF-5
Consolidated statements of cash flowsF-6
Notes to consolidated financial statementsF-8

Unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020 and for the yearsthree months ended December 31, 2009, 2008June 30, 2020 and 2007

F-72019: 

Notes to Financial Statements

F-8 
Consolidated balance sheetsF-39

Interim Financial Statements

Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss
F-40

Condensed Balance Sheets asConsolidated statements of September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009changes in stockholders’ equity

F-23F-41

Condensed StatementsConsolidated statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September  30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)cash flows

F-24F-42

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)

F-25

Notes to Condensed Financial Statementsinterim consolidated financial statements

F-26F-44

REPORTREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

CortexRespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Subsidiary

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CortexRespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20092019 and 2008, and2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss,(deficiency), and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009. Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s management is responsibleUnited States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has experienced recurring losses, negative cash flows from operations, has limited capital resources, and a net stockholders’ deficiency. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for theseOpinion

These consolidated financial statements.statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audits, included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/
HASKELL & WHITE LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2004.

Irvine, California

April 7, 2010

14, 2020

F-2

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
       
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $16,690  $33,284 
Advance payment on research contract  -   48,912 
Prepaid expenses, including current portion of long-term prepaid insurance of $10,586 at December 31, 2019 and $14,945 at December 31, 2018  28,638   38,880 
         
Total current assets  45,328   121,076 
Long-term prepaid insurance, net of current portion of $10,586 and $14,945 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 respectively  -   3,114 
         
Total assets $45,328  $124,190 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including $476,671 and $400,229 payable to related parties at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively $3,772,030  $3,303,120 
Accrued compensation and related expenses  2,083,841   1,304,434 
Convertible notes payable, currently due and payable on demand, including accrued interest of $113,304 and $62,635 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, (of which $43,666, including accrued interest of $18,666, was deemed to be in default at December 31, 2019) (Note 4)  551,591   239,666 
Note payable to SY Corporation, including accrued interest of $363,280 and $315,307 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (payment obligation currently in default – Note 4)  766,236   744,441 
Notes and advances payable to officers, including accrued interest of $35,388 and $25,116 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (Note 4)  142,238   102,716 
Notes payable to former officer, including accrued interest of $41,977 and $26,561 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively (Note 4)  169,577   154,161 
Other short-term notes payable  4,634   8,907 
         
Total current liabilities  7,490,147   5,857,445 
         
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)        
         
Stockholders’ deficiency: (Note 6)        
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; $0.6667 per share liquidation preference; aggregate liquidation preference $25,001; shares authorized: 37,500; shares issued and outstanding: 37,500; common shares issuable upon conversion at 0.00030 common shares per Series B share: 11  21,703   21,703 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; shares authorized: 65,000,000; shares issued and outstanding: 4,175,072 and 3,872,076 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively  4,175   3,872 
Additional paid-in capital  159,038,388   158,635,222 
Accumulated deficit  (166,509,085)  (164,394,052)
         
Total stockholders’ deficiency  (7,444,819)  (5,733,225)
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency $45,328  $124,190 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements and

report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F-3

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
       
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative, including $485,332 and $740,975 to related parties for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively $1,137,175  $1,488,238 
Research and development, including $490,908 and $495,638 to related parties for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively  599,329   688,286 
         
Total operating costs and expenses  1,736,504   2,176,524 
         
Loss from operations  (1,736,504)  (2,176,524)
         
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other liabilities in exchange for equity  -   (166,382)
Interest expense, including $60,135 and $42,821 to related parties for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively  (404,661)  (136,243)
Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain  26,132   (112,641)
         
Net loss $(2,115,033) $(2,591,790)
         
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.54) $(0.77)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  3,908,479   3,351,105 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements and

report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F-4

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

  Series B                
  Convertible                
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Additional     Total 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Par Value  

Paid-in

Capital

  

Accumulated

Deficit

  

Stockholders’

Deficiency

 
                      
Balance at December 31, 2017  37,500  $21,703   3,065,261  $3,065  $157,422,110  $(161,802,262) $(4,355,384)
Fair value of common stock options issued for services  -   -   -   -   29,248       29,248 
Fair value of common stock options issued in exchange for accrued compensation and accounts payable                  335,529       335,529 
Common stock issued related to extinguishment of convertible notes  -   -   284,358   284   318,236       318,520 
Sale of common stock units in private placement, net of escrow fees of $5,000  -   -   191,194   191   195,559       195,750 
Issuance of common stock units in exchange for note payable to officer  -   -   47,620   48   49,952       50,000 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection issuance of units in exchange for note payable to officer                  49,975       49,975 
Issuance of common stock to patent counsel          283,643   284   198,266       198,550 
Fair value of original issue discount associated with warrants issued with convertible notes                  36,347       36,347 
Net Loss                     $(2,591,790) $(2,591,790)
Balance at December 31, 2018  37,500  $21,703   3,872,076  $3,872  $158,635,222  $(164,394,052) $(5,733,255)
Warrants issued with respect to convertible notes issued from January through March 2019                  45,812       45,812 
Common stock issued related to convertible notes          17,500   17   3,316       3,333 
Discounts associated with convertible note issuances from April through November 2019                  329,019       329,019 
Common stock issued as partial settlement of convertible notes issued from April through May 2019          285,496   286   25,019       25,305 
Net Loss                     $(2,115,033) $(2,115,033)
Balance at December 31, 2019  37,500  $21,703   4,175,072  $4,175  $159,038,388  $(166,509,085) $(7,444,819)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements and

report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F-5

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
       
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(2,115,033) $(2,591,790)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Amortization of debt discounts related to convertible notes payable  215,575   8,378 
Costs associated with convertible note conversion paid with common stock  750     
Loss on extinguishment of debt  -   105,254 
Loss on extinguishment of other liabilities  -   11,154 
Loss on exchange of officer note  -   49,974 
Stock-based compensation and fees included in -        
General and administrative expenses  -   14,248 
Research and development expenses  -   15,000 
Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)  (26,132)  112,641 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) decrease in -        
Prepaid expenses and advanced clinical research payments  13,355   18,962 
Increase (decrease) in -        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  524,324   703,682 
Accrued compensation and related expenses  779,407   1,025,484 
Accrued interest payable  120,009   99,645 
Net cash used in operating activities  (487,745)  (427,368)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from sale of common stock units and issuance of restricted stock, net of fees  -   195,750 
Proceeds from officer notes  22,751   100,000 
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable  478,150   80,000 
Capitalized note costs  (29,750)    
Net cash provided by financing activities  471,151   375,750 
         
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Net decrease  (16,594)  (51,618)
Balance at beginning of period  33,284   84,902 
Balance at end of period $16,690  $33,284 

(Continued)

F-6

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Continued)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
       
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:      
Cash paid for -        
Interest $5,130  $3,345 
         
Non-cash financing activities:        
10% convertible notes payable, including accrued interest of $62,267 exchanged for common stock $-  $213,266 
Principal on convertible notes payable paid with common stock $24,554  $- 
Conversion fees paid with common stock upon principal payment on convertible notes payable $750  $- 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses extinguished with common stock options $-  $138,273 
Accrued compensation extinguished with option to purchase common stock options $-   200,350 
Officer note payable, exchanged for common stock and warrants $-   50,000 
Short-term note payable issued in connection with financing of directors and officers insurance policy $61,746  $63,750 
Short-term note payable issued in connection with financing of clinical trial and other office insurance policies $9,322  $9,322 
Fair value of common stock issued to service provider $-  $198,550 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements and

report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F-7

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization

RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“RespireRx,” the “Company,” “we” or “our” includes our wholly-owned subsidiary, Pier Pharmacuticals, Inc., unless the context indicates otherwise) was formed in 1987 under the name Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

BALANCE SHEETS

   December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2008
 

Assets

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $226,466   $1,430,886  

Marketable securities

   —      2,710,434  

Other current assets

   19,578    154,884  
         

Total current assets

   246,044    4,296,204  

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net

   383,347    809,458  

Deferred offering costs

   29,917    —    

Other

   46,667    46,667  
         
  $705,975   $5,152,329  
         

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $1,575,240   $1,123,015  

Accrued wages, salaries and related expenses

   331,414    293,746  

Advance for MCI project

   315,742    311,723  

Deferred rent

   —      27,123  
         

Total current liabilities

   2,222,396    1,755,607  

Other non-current liability

   11,288    —    
         

Total liabilities

   2,233,684    1,755,607  
         

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 7)

   

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

   

Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; $0.6667 per share liquidation preference; shares authorized: 3,200,000; shares issued and outstanding: 37,500; common shares issuable upon conversion: 3,679

   21,703    21,703  

Common stock, $0.001 par value; shares authorized: 205,000,000; shares issued and outstanding: 68,412,618 (December 31, 2009) and 47,615,209 (December 31, 2008)

   68,413    47,615  

Additional paid-in capital

   118,525,140    112,686,078  

Unrealized loss, available for sale marketable securities

   —      (3,884

Accumulated deficit

   (120,142,965  (109,354,790
         

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

   (1,527,709  3,396,722  
         
  $705,975   $5,152,329  
         

See accompanying notes.

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

STATEMENTSOF OPERATIONS

   Year ended
December 31,
2009
  Year ended
December 31,
2008
  Year ended
December 31,
2007
 

Revenues:

    

Research and license revenue

  $—     $—     $—    

Grant revenue

   —      —      —    

Total revenues

   —      —      —    

Operating expenses (A):

    

Research and development

   4,597,522    10,780,324    9,327,298  

General and administrative

   3,737,235    4,258,603    4,319,918  
             

Total operating expenses

   8,334,757    15,038,927    13,647,216  
             

Loss from operations

   (8,334,757  (15,038,927  (13,647,216

Interest income, net

   16,580    443,061    678,053  

Loss on sale of fixed assets

   (123,177  —      —    
             

Net loss

  $(8,441,354 $(14,595,866 $(12,969,163

Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock

   (831,704  —      —    

Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

   (1,515,117  —      —    
             

Net loss applicable to common stock

  $(10,788,175 $(14,595,866 $(12,969,163
             

Net loss per share, basic and diluted

  $(0.19 $(0.31 $(0.31
             

Shares used in basic and diluted calculation

   55,782,949    47,571,680    42,133,152  
             

(A)    Operating expenses include the following non-cash stock-based compensation charges:

    

Research and development

  $226,007   $721,668   $1,371,351  

General and administrative

   347,167    577,417    865,831  
             
  $573,174   $1,299,085   $2,237,182  
             

See accompanying notes.

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

STATEMENTSOF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

  Series B
convertible
preferred
stock
  0% Series E
convertible
preferred
stock
  Series F
convertible
preferred
stock
  Common
stock
  Additional
paid-in capital
  Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
  Accumulated
deficit
  Total 

Balance, December 31, 2006

 $21,703   $—     $—     $34,953   $90,056,734   $(3,205 $(81,789,761 $8,320,424  

Sale of 5,021,427 shares of common stock, $1.12 per share, net of expenses

  —      —      —      5,022    5,075,279    —      —      5,080,301  

Sale of 7,075,000 shares of common stock, $2.00 per share, net of expenses

  —      —      —      7,075    13,128,336    —      —      13,135,411  

Issuance of 333,667 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants

  —      —      —      333    612,887    —      —      613,220  

Issuance of 159,311 shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options

  —      —      —      159    229,091    —      —      229,250  

Issuance and vesting of stock options and warrants for consultants and other service providers

  —      —      —      —      77,039    —      —      77,039  

Non-cash stock-based employee compensation charges

  —      —      —      —      2,160,142    —      —      2,160,142  

Comprehensive loss

        

Net loss

  —      —      —      —      —      —      (12,969,163  (12,969,163

Unrealized gain on available for sale U.S. Government and other marketable securities

  —      —      —      —      —      30,278    —      30,278  
                 

Comprehensive loss

  —      —      —      —      —      30,278    (12,969,163  (12,938,885
                                

Balance, December 31, 2007

 $21,703   $—     $—     $47,542   $111,339,508   $27,073   $(94,758,924 $16,676,902  
                                

Issuance of 22,750 shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options

  —      —      —      23    8,509    —      —      8,532  

Issuance of 50,033 shares of common stock to employees in exchange for accrued paid time off

  —      —      —      50    38,976    —      —      39,026  

Issuance and vesting of stock options and warrants for consultants and other service providers

  —      —      —      —      49,619    —      —      49,619  

Non-cash stock-based employee compensation charges

  —      —      —      —      1,249,466    —      —      1,249,466  

Comprehensive loss

        

Net loss

  —      —��     —      —      —      —      (14,595,866  (14,595,866

Unrealized loss on available for sale U.S. Government and other marketable securities

  —      —      —      —      —      (30,957  —      (30,957
                 

Comprehensive loss

  —      —      —      —      —      (30,957  (14,595,866  (14,626,823
                                

Balance, December 31, 2008

 $21,703   $—     $—     $47,615   $112,686,078   $(3,884 $(109,354,790 $3,396,722  
                                

Continued…

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

STATEMENTSOF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(CONTINUED)

  Series B
convertible
preferred
stock
  0% Series E
convertible
preferred
stock
  Series F
convertible
preferred
stock
  Common
stock
  Additional
paid-in capital
  Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
  Accumulated
deficit
  Total 

Balance, December 31, 2008

 $21,703   $—     $—     $47,615   $112,686,078   $(3,884 $(109,354,790 $3,396,722  

Sale of 1,475 shares of 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, net of expenses

  —      831,704    —      —      412,984    —      —      1,244,688  

Beneficial conversion feature of 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock

  —      —      —      —      831,704    —      (831,704  —    

Issuance of 8,676,471 shares of common stock upon exercise of 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock

  —      (831,704  —      8,676    823,028    —      —      —    

Sale of 4,029 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, net of expenses

  —      —      1,284,225    —      410,952    —      —      1,695,177  

Beneficial conversion feature of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

  —      —      —      —      1,515,117    —      (1,515,117  —    

Issuance of 12,120,938 shares of common stock upon exercise of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

  —      —      (1,284,225  12,122    1,272,103    —      —      —    

Issuance and vesting of stock options and warrants for consultants and other service providers

  —      —      —      —      3,346    —      —      3,346  

Non-cash stock-based employee compensation charges

  —      —      —      —      569,828    —      —      569,828  

Comprehensive loss

        

Net loss

  —      —      —      —      —      —      (8,441,354  (8,441,354

Realized gain on available for sale U.S. Government and other marketable securities

  —      —      —      —      —      3,884    —      3,884  
                 

Comprehensive loss

  —      —      —      —      —      —      (8,441,354  (8,437,470
                                

Balance, December 31, 2009

 $21,703   $—     $—     $68,413   $118,525,140   $—     $(120,142,965 $(1,527,709
                                

See accompanying notes.

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

STATEMENTSOF CASH FLOWS

   Year ended
December 31,
2009
  Year ended
December 31,
2008
  Year ended
December 31,
2007
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net loss

  $(8,441,354 $(14,595,866 $(12,969,163

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   186,940    164,890    126,851  

Stock option compensation expense

   573,174    1,299,085    2,237,182  

Loss on sale of fixed assets

   123,177    —      —    

Changes in operating assets/liabilities:

    

Accrued interest on marketable securities

   68    (39,260  (32,699

Accounts receivable

   —      —      160,088  

Other current assets

   135,306    92,076    117,859  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   462,770    61,638    (339,679

Changes in other assets and other liabilities

   15,898    (28,644  (42,766
             

Net cash used in operating activities

   (6,944,021  (13,046,081  (10,742,327
             

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Purchase of marketable securities

   —      (3,186,104  (17,059,966

Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities

   2,713,659    13,757,359    11,665,800  

Purchase of fixed assets

   (1,491  (123,701  (550,222

Proceeds from sales of fixed assets

   117,485    —      —    
             

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   2,829,653    10,447,554    (5,944,388
             

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock in January 2007 registered direct offering, net

   —      —      5,080,301  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock in August 2007 registered direct offering, net

   —      —      13,135,411  

Proceeds from issuance of 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock in April 2009 registered direct offering, net

   1,244,688    —      —    

Proceeds from issuance of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock in July 2009 private placement, net

   1,695,177    —      —    

Capitalized financing costs for private placement of convertible promissory note payable in January 2010

   (29,917  —      —    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants

   —      —      613,220  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

   —      8,532    229,250  
             

Net cash provided by financing activities

   2,909,948    8,532    19,058,182  
             

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (1,204,420  (2,589,995  2,371,467  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

   1,430,886    4,020,881    1,649,414  
             

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  $226,466   $1,430,886   $4,020,881  
             

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:

    

Accretion of fair value of beneficial conversion feature on 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock

  $831,704   $—     $—    

Accretion of fair value of beneficial conversion feature on Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

  $1,515,117   $—     $—    

See accompanying notes.

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

NOTESTO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business — Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed to engage in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative pharmaceuticals for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. SinceOn December 16, 2015, RespireRx filed a Certificate of Amendment to its formationSecond Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to amend its Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation to change its name from Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. While previously developing potential applications for respiratory disorders, RespireRx has retained and expanded its neuromodulator intellectual property and data with respect to neurological and psychiatric disorders and is considering developing certain potential products in 1987, the Company has been engaged in research and early clinical development activities.this platform, if it is able to obtain additional financing and/or strategic relationships.

In January 1999, the Company entered into a research collaboration and exclusive worldwide license agreement with NV OrganonAugust 2012, RespireRx acquired Pier Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Organon”Pier”) that will enable Organon to develop and commercialize the Company’s AMPAKINE® technology for the treatment of schizophrenia and depression (Note 5)., which is now its wholly-owned subsidiary.

In October 2000, the Company entered into a research collaboration agreement and an exclusive license agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier (“Servier”) (Note 4). The agreements, as amended to date, will enable Servier to develop and commercialize select AMPAKINE compounds for the treatment of (i) declines in cognitive performance associated with aging, (ii) neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, and (iii) anxiety disorders. In early December 2006, the Company terminated the research collaboration with Servier. The license agreement with Servier, as amended to date, continues in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

In March 2010,2020, RespireRx and UWM Research Foundation, an affiliate of the CompanyUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, entered into an asset purchaseoption agreement with Biovail Laboratories International SRL (“Biovail”UWMRF Option Agreement”) pursuant to which Biovail acquiredRespireRx has a six-month option to license the identified intellectual property pursuant to license terms substantially in the Form of a Patent License Agreement (“UWMRF License Agreement”) that is attached to the UWMRF Option Agreement as Appendix I. The UWMRF License Agreement, if it becomes effective, will expand the Company’s rightsneuromodulator program which has historically included the Company’s AMPAkine program to certain AMPAKINE compoundsinclude a GABA-A program as well. See Note 10. Subsequent Events.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements are of RespireRx and related intellectual property, including CX717, for use in the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. As partits wholly-owned subsidiary, Pier.

2. Business

The mission of the transaction, Biovail licensed backCompany is to develop innovative and revolutionary treatments to combat disorders caused by disruption of neuronal signaling. We are developing treatment options that address conditions that affect millions of people, but for which there are few or poor treatment options, including obstructive sleep apnea (“OSA”), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”) and recovery from spinal cord injury (“SCI”), as well as certain neurological orphan diseases such as Fragile X Syndrome. RespireRx is developing a pipeline of new drug products based on our broad patent portfolios for two drug platforms: (i) cannabinoids, including dronabinol (a synthetic form of Δ9-THC) that act upon the nervous system’s endogenous cannabinoid receptors and (ii) neuromodulators, which we now call EndeavourRx, including (a) AMPAkines, proprietary compounds that positively modulate AMPA-type glutamate receptors to promote neuronal function and (b) positive allosteric modulators (“PAMs”) of the gamma-amino-butyric acid subunit A (“GABA-A”) receptors that are the subject of an option agreement dated March 2, 2020 between the Company and the UWM Research Foundation, Inc. (“UWMRF”), an affiliate of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. See Note 10. Subsequent Events.

Cannabinoids

With respect to the Company exclusive and irrevocable rightscannabinoid platform, two Phase 2 clinical trials have been completed demonstrating the ability of dronabinol to certainstatistically significantly reduce the symptoms of OSA, which management believes is potentially a multi-billion-dollar market. Subject to raising sufficient financing (of which no assurance can be provided), we believe that we have put most of the acquired AMPAKINE compounds for use outsidenecessary pieces into place to rapidly initiate a Phase 3 clinical trial program. By way of definition, when a new drug is allowed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to be tested in humans, Phase 1 clinical trials are conducted in healthy people to determine safety and pharmacokinetics. If successful, Phase 2 clinical trials are conducted in patients to determine safety and preliminary efficacy. Phase 3 trials, large scale studies to determine efficacy and safety, are the final step prior to seeking FDA approval to market a drug.

With the cannabinoid platform, we plan to create a wholly-owned private subsidiary of RespireRx (“Newco”, official name not yet determined) with its own management team and board of directors.

Neuromodulators – EndeavourRx - AMPAkines and GABA-A

Neuromodulators are chemicals released by neurons that enable neurons to communicate with one another. This process is called neurotransmission. Neurons release neurotransmitters that attach to a very specific protein structure, termed a receptor, residing on an adjacent neuron. This neurotransmission process can either increase or decrease the excitability of the fieldneuron receiving the message.

Neuromodulators do not act directly at the neurotransmitter binding site, but instead act at accessory sites that enhance (Positive Allosteric Modulators – “PAMs”) or reduce (Negative Allosteric Modulators – “NAMs”) the actions of respiratory depressionneurotransmitters at their primary receptor sites. Neuromodulators have no intrinsic activity of their own. We believe that neuromodulators offer the possibility of developing “kinder and gentler” neuropharmacological drugs with greater pharmacological specificity and reduced side effects compared to present drugs, especially in disorders for which there is a significant unmet or vaso-occlusive crises associatedpoorly met clinical need such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”), Autism Spectrum Disorder (“ASD”), Fragile X Syndrome (“FSX”) and CNS-driven disorders. We are focused presently on developing drugs that act as positive allosteric modulators (“PAM”) at the AMPA and GABA-A receptors.

Building upon our AMPAkine platform as a foundation, we also are planning the establishment of a second business unit, which we now call collectively with sickle cell disease (Note 10)the AMPAkines, EndeavourRx, that will focus on developing novel neuromodulators for disorders due to alterations in neurotransmission. Through an extensive series of translational studies over a number of years, but numerous researchers and from the cellular level up to human Phase 2 clinical trials, selected AMPAkines have demonstrated target site engagement and positive results in patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (see below).

From inception

Through an extensive AMPAkine translational research effort from the cellular level through December 31, 2009,Phase 2 clinical trials, the Company has generated only modestdeveloped a family of novel, low impact AMPAkines, including CX717, CX1739 and CX1942 that may have clinical application in the treatment of CNS-driven neurobehavioral and cognitive disorders, spinal cord injury, neurological diseases, and certain orphan indications. From our AMPAkine platform, our lead clinical compounds, CX717 and CX1739, have successfully completed multiple Phase 1 safety trials. Both compounds have also completed Phase 2 efficacy trials demonstrating target engagement, by antagonizing the ability of opioids to induce respiratory depression. CX717 has successfully completed a Phase 2 trial demonstrating the ability to statistically significantly reduce the symptoms of adult ADHD. In an early Phase 2 study, CX1739 improved breathing in patients with central sleep apnea. Preclinical studies have highlighted the potential ability of these AMPAkines to improve motor function in animals with spinal injury. Subject to raising sufficient financing (of which no assurance can be provided), we believe that we will be able to rapidly initiate a human Phase 2 study with CX1739 and/or CX717 in patients with spinal cord injury and a human Phase 2B study in patients with ADHD with either CX717 or CX1739.

In order to expand the asset base of EndeavourRx, we have entered into an option agreement with UWMRF whereby RespireRx has a six-month option commencing on March 2, 2020, to license, certain intellectual property regarding chemical compounds that act as positive allosteric modulators (“PAMs”) at certain specific receptors for gamma-amino-butyric acid type A (“GABA-A”), a major inhibitory transmitter in the brain (see Subsequent Events). Certain of these compounds have shown impressive activity in a broad range of animal models of refractory/resistant epilepsy and other convulsant disorders, as well as in brain tissue samples obtained from epileptic patients in pre-clinical research conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee by Drs. James Cook and Jeffrey Witkin among others and at collaborating institutions. Epilepsy is a chronic and highly prevalent neurological disorder that affects millions of people world-wide. While many anticonvulsant drugs have been approved to decrease seizure probability, seizures are not well controlled and, in as many as 60-70% of patients, existing drugs are not efficacious at some point in the disease progression. We believe that the medical and patient community are in clear agreement that there is desperate need for improved antiepileptic drugs. In addition, these compounds have shown positive activity in animal models of migraine, inflammatory and neuropathic pain, as well as other areas of interest. Because of their GABA receptor subunit specificity, the compounds have a greatly reduced liability to produce sedation, motor incoordination, memory impairments and tolerance, side effects commonly associated with non-specific GABA PAMs, such as benzodiazepines.

Our major challenge has been to raise substantial equity or equity-linked financing to support research and development programs for our two drug platforms, while minimizing the dilutive effect to pre-existing stockholders. At present, we believe that we are hindered primarily by our public corporate structure, our OTCQB listing, limited float and low market capitalization as a result of our low stock price. For this reason, RespireRx is considering an internal restructuring plan that contemplates spinning out our two drug platforms into separate operating revenues,businesses.

We believe that by creating EndeavourRx and ResolutionRx, it may be possible, through separate finance channels, to optimize the majorityasset values of both the cannabinoid platform and the neuromodulation platform.

Going Concern

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which it derived from its agreements with Serviercontemplates the realization of assets and Organon, as further describedsatisfaction of liabilities in Notes 4the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $2,115,033 and 5, respectively. There were no revenues$2,591,790 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 20082019 and 2007.

Going Concern2018, respectively, and negative operating cash flows of $487,745 and $427,368 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company will require substantial additional funds to advance its researchalso had a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,444,819 at December 31, 2019 and development programs andexpects to continue its operations, particularly if it decides to independently conduct later-stage clinical testingincur net losses and applynegative operating cash flows for regulatory approval of any of its proposed products, and if it independently undertakes marketing and promotion of its products. Additionally,at least the Company may require additional funds innext few years. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the event that it decides to pursue strategic acquisitions or licenses for other products or businesses. Based on its current operating plan, including planned clinical trials and other product research and development costs, the Company estimates that its existing cash resources, along with $1,500,000 of proceeds from its private placement of a convertible promissory note in January 2010 and the proceeds of $10,000,000 from the transaction to sell selected AMPAKINE compounds and rights to respiratory depression to Biovail in March 2010, will be sufficient to meet its requirements into the second quarter of 2011 and allow the CompanyCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company believes that it will require additional capital to fund on-going operations beyond that time.

Cash Equivalents —The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments with maturities of less than three months when acquired to be cash equivalents.

Marketable Securities — Marketable securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gainsconcern, and losses, net of any tax, reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Company utilizes observable inputs based on quoted pricesthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in active markets for identical assets to record the fair value of its marketable securities. Authoritative guidance that establishes a framework for fair value for generally accepted accounting principles in the United States deems observable inputs for identical assets as Level 1 inputs, the most reliable in the hierarchy of inputs for determining fair value measurements.

The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in interest income. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on short-term investments are included in interest income. The cost of securities sold is basedreport on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in interest income.

Concentrations of Credit Risk — Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by investing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements — Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of their estimated useful lives, ranging from five to ten years, or the life of the lease, as appropriate.

Long-Lived Assets — The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the total amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and the eventual disposition are less than the asset’s carrying amount. The Company did not recognize any significant impairment losses during any of the periods presented.

Revenue Recognition — The Company recognizes revenue when all four of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii) the fees earned can be readily determined; and (iv) collectibility of the fees is reasonably assured.

Revenues from milestone payments are recognized when earned, as evidenced by written acknowledgement from the collaborator, provided that (i) the milestone event is substantive and its achievement was not reasonably assured at the inception of the agreement, and (ii) the Company’s performance obligations, if any, after the milestone achievement will continue to be funded by the collaborator at a comparable level to that before the milestone was achieved. If both of these criteria are not met, the milestone payment would be recognized over the remaining minimum period of the Company’s performance obligations under the arrangement.

If a collaborator develops and markets a product that utilizes the Company’s technology, the Company will be eligible to receive royalties based on net sales of the product, as defined by the relative agreement. The Company will recognize such royalties, if any, at the time that the royalties become payable to the Company from the collaborator.

For arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets, we recognize revenue from milestone payments over the remaining minimum period of performance obligations under such multiple element arrangements.

Amounts received for upfront technology license fees under multiple-element arrangements are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the period of committed services or performance, which approximates the level of efforts provided, if such arrangements require the Company’s on-going services or performance.

Employee Stock Options and Stock-Based Compensation —All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized in theconsolidated financial statements based on their fair values. For options granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of each option award was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:

   Year ended December 31, 
   2009  2008  2007 

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

   2.8  3.0  3.9

Dividend yield

   0  0  0

Volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock

   101  97  95

Weighted average life

   6.9 years    6.7 years    5.7 years  

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company also uses historical data to estimate the expected term of options granted and employee termination rates. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected useful life of the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The estimated weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $0.17, $0.52 and $0.71, respectively.

As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately $558,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based employee compensation arrangements. That non-cash cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.

Stock options and warrants issued to non-employees as compensation for services to be provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. The Company recognizes this expense over the period in which the services are provided. The Company’s net loss for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 includes expenses of approximately $3,000, $50,000 and $77,000, respectively, for non-cash stock-based compensation for options issued to consultants and other non-employees.

The Company issues new shares to satisfy stock option and warrant exercises. There were no options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009. During2019, expressed substantial doubt about the years ended December 31, 2008Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is currently, and 2007,has for some time, been in significant financial distress. It has extremely limited cash resources and current assets and has no ongoing source of sustainable revenue. Management is continuing to address various aspects of the total intrinsic valueCompany’s operations and obligations, including, without limitation, debt obligations, financing requirements, intellectual property, licensing agreements, legal and patent matters and regulatory compliance, and has taken steps to continue to raise new debt and equity capital to fund the Company’s business activities from both related and unrelated parties.

The Company is continuing its efforts to raise additional capital in order to be able to pay its liabilities and fund its business activities on a going forward basis, including the pursuit of options exercised was approximately $7,000 and $105,000, respectively. The effect of potentially issuable shares of common stock was not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share given that the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Research and Development Costs — All costs related toCompany’s planned research and development activities are treated as expensesactivities. The Company regularly evaluates various measures to satisfy the Company’s liquidity needs, including development and other agreements with collaborative partners and, when necessary, seeking to exchange or restructure the Company’s outstanding securities. The Company is evaluating certain changes to its operations and structure to facilitate raising capital from sources that may be interested in financing only discrete aspects of the Company’s development programs. Such changes could include a significant reorganization, which may include the formation of one or more subsidiaries into which one or more programs may be contributed. As a result of the Company’s current financial situation, the Company has limited access to external sources of debt and equity financing. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to secure additional financing in the period incurred.amounts necessary to fully fund its operating and debt service requirements. If the Company is unable to access sufficient cash resources, the Company may be forced to discontinue its operations entirely and liquidate.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Comprehensive Loss —All componentsPrinciples of comprehensive loss, including net loss,Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are reportedprepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and include the financial statements of RespireRx and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pier. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the period in which they are recognized. Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Net loss and other comprehensive loss, including unrealized gains and losses on investments, are reported net of any related tax effect to arrive at comprehensive loss.consolidation.

Net Loss Per Share — Net loss per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company has reserved approximately 33.7 million shares of common stock for issuance upon exercise of outstanding stock options and stock purchase warrants, as well as for conversion of the Company’s Series B preferred stock, as further described in Note 3. The effect of the potentially issuable shares of common stock was not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share given that the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesGAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include, among other things, accounting for potential liabilities, and the assumptions used in valuing stock-based compensation issued for services. Actual amounts may differ from those estimates.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company limits its exposure to credit risk by investing its cash with high quality financial institutions. The Company’s cash balances may periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced a loss in such accounts to date.

NoteFair Value of Financial Instruments

The authoritative guidance with respect to fair value of financial instruments established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels and requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of three categories, as presented below. Disclosure as to transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2, — Detailand activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, is also required.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for an identical asset or liability that the Company has the ability to access as of Selected Balance Sheet Accountsthe measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include active-exchange traded securities and exchange-based derivatives.

Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include fixed income securities, non-exchange-based derivatives, mutual funds, and fair-value hedges.

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data for the asset or liability which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include infrequently-traded, non-exchange-based derivatives and commingled investment funds, and are measured using present value pricing models.

The Company did not hold any marketable securities asdetermines the level in the fair value hierarchy within which each fair value measurement falls in its entirety, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs an analysis of December 31, 2009. The following is a summary of marketable securities as of December 31, 2008:the assets and liabilities at each reporting period end.

 

   Cost   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
 

Corporate obligations

  $1,202,511    $1,195    $(3,960 $1,199,746  

Mortgage backed government securities

   748,046     1,994     (157  749,883  

Other asset backed securities

   514,357     —       (2,967  511,390  

Commercial paper

   249,404     11     —      249,415  
                   

Total marketable securities

  $2,714,318    $3,200    $(7,084 $2,710,434  
                   

The carrying amounts of financial instruments (consisting of cash, advances on research grants and accounts payable and accrued expenses) are considered by the Company to be representative of the respective fair values of these instruments due to the short-term nature of those instruments. With respect to the note payable to SY Corporation and the convertible notes payable, management does not believe that the credit markets have materially changed for these types of borrowings since the original borrowing date. The Company considers the carrying amounts of the notes payable to officers, inclusive of accrued interest, to be representative of the respective fair values of such instruments due to the short-term nature of those instruments and their terms.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs incurred in connection with ongoing debt and equity financings, including legal fees, are deferred until the related financing is either completed or abandoned.

Costs related to abandoned debt or equity financings are charged to operations in the period of abandonment. Costs related to completed equity financings are netted against the proceeds.

Capitalized Financing Costs

The Company presents debt issuance costs related to debt liability in its consolidated balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation for debt discounts.

Convertible Notes Payable

Convertible notes are evaluated to determine if they should be recorded at amortized costcost. To the extent that there are associated warrants, commitment shares or a beneficial conversion feature, the convertible notes and estimatedwarrants are evaluated to determine if there are embedded derivatives to be identified, bifurcated and valued at fair value in connection with and at the time of such financing.

Extinguishment of Debt

The Company accounts for the extinguishment of debt in accordance with GAAP by comparing the carrying value of the debt to the fair value of available-for-sale marketable securities asconsideration paid or assets given up and recognizing a loss or gain in the consolidated statement of December 31, 2008, by contractual maturity, are as follows:operations in the amount of the difference in the period in which such transaction occurs.

 

   Cost   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
 

Maturities

       

Within one year

  $2,199,961    $3,200    $(4,117 $2,199,044  

After one year through five years

   514,357     —       (2,967  511,390  
                   

Total marketable securities

  $2,714,318    $3,200    $(7,084 $2,710,434  
                   
F-12

Gross realized gains

Prepaid Insurance

Prepaid insurance represents the premium paid in March 2019 for directors’ and lossesofficers’ insurance as well as the amount paid in April 2019 for office-related insurances and clinical trial coverage. Directors’ and officers’ insurance tail coverage, purchased in March 2013 and which is a seven-year policy, is being amortized on sales of marketable securities were not significanta straight-line basis over the policy period and all amounts due within one year are reclassified as current prepaid insurance. The amount amortizable in the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008ensuing twelve-month period is recorded as prepaid insurance in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at each reporting date and 2007. The Company manages risk on its investment portfolio by matching scheduled investment maturities with its cash requirements.

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements consistamortized to the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for each reporting period. Amounts due after the following:ensuing year are recorded as long-term prepaid insurance.

 

   December 31, 
   2009  2008 

Laboratory equipment

  $1,733,461   $2,247,215  

Leasehold improvements

   773,871    773,871  

Furniture and equipment

   183,549    183,549  

Computers and software

   332,557    418,858  
         
   3,023,438    3,623,493  

Accumulated depreciation

   (2,640,091  (2,814,035
         
  $383,347   $809,458  
         

Note 3 — Stockholders’ EquityStock-Based Awards

Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized a totalperiodically issues common stock and stock options to officers, directors, Scientific Advisory Board members, consultants and other vendors for services rendered. Such issuances vest and expire according to terms established at the issuance date of 5,000,000 shareseach grant.

The Company accounts for stock-based payments to officers and directors by measuring the value of preferredthe equity awards based on the grant date fair value of the awards, with the cost recognized as compensation expense on the straight-line basis in the Company’s consolidated financial statements over the vesting period of the awards.

Stock grants, which are sometimes subject to time-based vesting, are measured at the grant date fair value and charged to operations ratably over the vesting period.

Stock options granted to members of the Company’s outside consultants and other vendors are valued on the grant date. As the stock paroptions vest, the Company recognizes this expense over the period in which the services are provided.

The fair value $0.001 per share,of stock options granted as stock-based compensation is determined utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, and is affected by several variables, the most significant of which as of December 31, 2009, 1,250,000 shares have been designated as 9% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (non-voting, “9% Preferred”); 3,200,000 shares have been designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (non-voting, “Series B Preferred”); 500 shares have been designated as Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (non-voting, “Series D Preferred”); 35,000 have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (non-voting, “Series A Junior Participating”) and 514,500 shares were undesignated and may be issued with such rights and powers asare the Board of Directors may designate. No shareslife of the 9% Preferred or Series D Preferred were outstanding duringequity award, the years ended December 31, 2008exercise price of the stock option as compared to the fair value of the common stock on the grant date, and 2009.

Series B Preferred outstanding asthe estimated volatility of December 31, 2009 and 2008 consistedthe common stock over the estimated life of 37,500 shares issuedthe equity award. Estimated volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in a May 1991 private placement. Each shareeffect at the time of Series B Preferred is convertible into approximately 0.09812 sharesgrant. The fair value of common stock at an effective conversionis determined by reference to the quoted market price of $6.795 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2009, the remaining shares of Series B Preferred outstanding are convertible into 3,679 shares of common stock. The Company may redeem the Series B Preferred at a price of $0.6667 per share, an amount equal to its liquidation preference, at any time upon 30 days’ prior notice.

In April 2009, the Company completed a registered direct offering of 1,475 shares of its newly designated 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock with a stated value of $1,000 per share (the “Series E Preferred”) and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,941,176 shares of its common stock to a single institutional investor in exchange for gross proceeds of $1,475,000. Net proceeds from the offering were approximately $1,250,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.2721 per share (reduced from $0.3401 per share in February 2010) and are exercisable on or before October 17, 2012.

The Company evaluated the exercise and conversion features for the Series E Preferred and the related warrants issued in the transaction and deemed both securities to be equity instruments indexed to the Company’s common stock.

In recording the proceeds from this offering, the Company estimated the fair value of the

Stock options and warrants issued to non-employees as compensation for services to be provided to the investor using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The valueCompany or in settlement of the Series E Preferred was estimateddebt are accounted for based upon the fair value of the underlying common stock issuable upon conversion. The Company then usedservices provided or the relativeestimated fair value method to allocate the proceeds to the investor warrants and the Series E Preferred.

The Company calculated an effective conversion price for the Series E Preferred based upon the allocated proceeds and then measured the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion right embedded within such Preferred Stock. The beneficial conversion right is based onstock option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. Management uses the difference betweenBlack-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of the Company’s common stock options and warrants issued by the effective conversion price ofCompany. The Company recognizes this expense over the Series E Preferred onperiod in which the closing date ofservices are provided.

During the offering.

Given that the Series E Preferred was immediately convertible, the value of the beneficial conversion right was fully amortized at the date of issuance of such Preferred Stock through a charge to the Company’s accumulated deficit. That charge is reflected in the accompanying statement of operations as an increase in the net loss for purposes of determining the net loss applicable to common stock for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

The Series E Preferred was subsequently fully converted into 8,676,471 shares of the Company’s common2019, there were no stock at a conversion price of $0.17 per share. Upon the conversion, shares of the Series E Preferred resumed the status of authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock and are no longer designated as Series E Preferred.

In July 2009, the Company completed a private placement of 4,029 shares of its newly designated Series F Convertible Preferred Stock with a stated value of $1,000 per share (the “Series F Preferred”) and warrantsoptions granted to purchase an aggregate of 6,060,470 shares of its common stock to a single institutional investor in exchange for gross proceeds of $4,029,000, of which $2,029,000 was placed in an escrow account. For conversions of the Series F Preferred prior to July 29, 2014, the Company agreed to pay the holder an amount from the escrow account equal to approximately $504 per $1,000 of stated value of the Series F Preferred converted. The warrants issued to the investor have an exercise price of $0.2699 per share and are exercisable onofficers, directors, Scientific Advisory Board members, consultants or before January 31, 2013.

The proceeds placed in the escrow account were recorded as a liability until such amounts were released to the investor in connection with conversions of the Series F Preferred. The Company evaluated the exercise and conversion features for the Series F Preferred and the related warrants issued in the transaction and deemed both securities to be equity instruments indexed to the Company’s common stock.

In recording the proceeds from this offering, the Company estimated the fair value of the warrants issued to the investor using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The value of the Series F Preferred was estimated based upon the fair value of the underlying common stock issuable upon conversion. The Company then used the relative fair value method to allocate the proceeds to the investor warrants and the Series F Preferred.

The Company calculated an effective conversion price for the Series F Preferred based upon the allocated proceeds and then measured the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion right embedded within such Preferred Stock. The beneficial conversion right is based on the difference between the fair value of the Company’s common stock and the effective conversion price of the Series F Preferred on the closing date of the offering.

Given that the Series F Preferred was convertible upon effectiveness of the registration statement for the underlying shares of the Company’s common stock, which occurred during August 2009, the value of the beneficial conversion right has been fully amortized as of December 31, 2009 through a charge to the Company’s accumulated deficit. That charge is reflected in the accompanying statement of operations as an increase in the net loss for purposes of determining the net loss applicable to common stock for theother vendors. During fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

As of December 31, 2009, the Series F Preferred has fully converted into 12,120,938 shares of the Company’s common2018, there were stock at a conversion price of $0.3324 per share and the $2,029,000 held in the escrow account has been released to the investor. Upon the conversion, shares of the Series F Preferred resumed the status of authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock and are no longer designated as Series F Preferred.

Common Stock and Common Stock Purchase Warrants

On January 22, 2007, the Company completed a registered direct offering with several institutional investors for shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5,624,000. Net proceeds from the offering were approximately $5,080,000. Under the terms of the transaction, the Company sold an aggregate of 5,021,427 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 3,263,927 shares of its common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.66 per share and are exercisable on or before January 21, 2012. The warrants are subject to a call provision in favor of the Company to the extent that the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $3.35 for any 13 consecutive trading-day period. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company received approximately $443,000 from the exercise of related warrants. No other related warrants were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. If the remaining 2,996,927 warrants are fully exercised, of which there can be no assurance, these warrants would provide approximately $4,975,000 of additional capital.

On August 29, 2007, the Company completed a registered direct offering with several institutional investors for shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $14,150,000. Net proceeds from the offering were approximately $13,135,000. Under the terms of the transaction, the Company sold an aggregate of 7,075,000 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 2,830,000 shares of its common stock to the investors. The investors’ warrants have an exercise price of $2.64 per share and are exercisable on or before August 28, 2012. In addition, the Company issued warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 176,875 shares of its common stock to the placement agents in the offering. The placement agents’ warrants have an exercise price of $3.96 per share and are exercisable on or before August 28, 2012. No related warrants were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. If the investor and placement agents warrants’ are fully exercised, of which there can be no assurance, these warrants would provide approximately $8,172,000 of additional capital.

In connection with the registered direct offering of the Company’s 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock in April 2009, as described more fully above, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,941,176 shares of its common stock to a single institutional investor. The warrants were issued with an exercise price of $0.3401 per share and are exercisable on or before October 17, 2012. In February 2010, the exercise price of these warrants was reduced to $0.2721 in exchange for the investor’s consent and waiver with respect to the Company’s completed financing transaction with Samyang Optics Co., Ltd. in January 2010, as explained more fully in Note 10. The warrants also are subject to a call provision in favor of the Company to the extent that the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $0.6802 for any 20 consecutive trading days. If the warrants are fully exercised, of which there can be no assurance, these warrants would provide approximately $1,889,000 of additional capital. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an additional aggregate of 433,824 shares of the Company’s common stock to the placement agent for the transaction. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.26 per share and are subject to the same term of exercisability as the warrants issued to the investor. The warrants issued to the placement agent are subject to a call provision in favor of the Company to the extent that the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $0.52 for any 20 consecutive trading days. If the warrants are fully exercised, of which there can be no assurance, these warrants would provide approximately $113,000 of additional capital. No related warrants were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009.

In connection with the private placement of the Company’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock in July 2009, as described more fully above, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,060,470 shares of its common stock to a single institutional investor. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.2699 per share and are exercisable on or before January 31, 2013. If the warrants are fully exercised, of which there can be no assurance, these warrants would provide approximately $1,636,000 of additional capital. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an additional aggregate of 606,047 shares of the Company’s common stock to the placement agent for the transaction. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.3656 per share and are subject to the same term of exercisability as the warrants issued to the investor. The warrants issued to the investor and the placement agent are subject to a call provision in favor of the Company to the extent that the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $0.5398 for any 20 consecutive trading days. If the warrants issued to the placement agent are fully exercised, of which there can be no assurance, these warrants would provide approximately $222,000 of additional capital.

In connection with the engagement of a consultant for investor relations purposes, from February 2003 through December 2004, the Company issued five-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 188,000 shares of its common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $1.59 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued warrants to purchase another 8,000 shares of its common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $2.77 per share. The applicable exercise prices for these warrants were derived from the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance and the warrants were fully exercisable when issued. During the year ended December 31, 2008, in exchange for ongoing services, the exercisability of previously issued warrants to purchase 42,000grants totaling 283,643 shares of common stock was extended to early September 2010. In connectiondesignees of one vendor with the term extensions, during the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company recorded non-cash stock compensation charges of approximately $7,000. As of December 31, 2009, warrants to purchase a total of 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock remained outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $2.83 per share. The expiration dates for the outstanding warrants, as amended, range from early January 2010 to early September 2010. No related warrants were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009.

In connection with business development activities, in July 2005 the Company issued a five-year warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $2.75 per share. The warrant is subject to certain conditions in order to become exercisable, which conditions remain unmet as of December 31, 2009.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had reserved an aggregate of 3,679 shares for issuance upon conversion of the Series B Preferred; 20,195,319 shares for issuance upon exercise of warrants; 13,538,498 shares for issuance upon exercise of outstanding stock options; and 411,969 shares for issuance upon exercise of stock options available for future grant.

Warrant transactions by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are summarized below:

   Number of
underlying shares
  Weighted
average exercise
price per share
 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2006

   8,311,409   $3.02  

Issued

   6,270,802    2.17  

Exercised

   (333,667  1.84  

Expired

   (437,248  3.46  
         

Outstanding as of December 31, 2007

   13,811,296   $2.65  

Issued

   —      —    

Exercised

   —      —    

Expired

   (1,890,668  2.50  
         

Outstanding as of December 31, 2008

   11,920,628   $2.67  

Issued

   14,041,517    0.31  

Exercised

   —      —    

Expired

   (5,766,826  3.25  
         

Outstanding as of December 31, 2009

   20,195,319   $0.89  
         

Information regarding warrants outstanding at December 31, 2009 is as follows:

Range of

exercise prices

  Number outstanding
and exercisable at
December 31, 2009
   

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual life

  Weighted average
exercise price
 

$0.26 - $0.37

   14,041,517    2.9 years  $0.31  

$1.65 - $2.41

   3,014,927    2.0 years   1.66  

$2.64 - $4.29

   3,138,875    2.6 years   2.72  
         
   20,195,319      
         

Stock Option and Stock Purchase Plan

The Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1996 Plan”), which terminated pursuant to its terms on October 25, 2006, provided for the granting of options and rights to purchase up to an aggregate of 10,213,474 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock to qualified employees, officers, directors, consultants and other service providers. Options previously granted under the 1996 Plan generally vest over a three-year period, although some options granted to officers included more accelerated vesting. Options previously granted under the 1996 Plan generally expire ten years from the date of grant, but some options granted to consultants expire five years from the date of grant.

On March 30, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), which subsequently was approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 10, 2006. Since the approval of the 2006 Plan, no further options have been or will be granted under the 1996 Plan. The 2006 Plan provides for the granting of options and rights to purchase up to an aggregate of 7,363,799 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock (subject to adjustment under certain circumstances, such as stock splits, recapitalizations and reorganization) to qualified employees, officers, directors, consultants and other service providers.

Under the 2006 Plan, the Company may issue a variety of equity vehicles to provide flexibility in implementing equity awards, including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock grants, stock appreciation rights, stock payment awards, restricted stock units and dividend equivalents. The exercise price of stock options offered under the 2006 Plan must be at least 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. If the person to whom an incentive stock option is granted is a 10% stockholder of the Company on the date of grant, the exercise price per share shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant. Vesting and expiration provisions for options granted under the 2006 Plan are similargrant of $198,550 which amount paid $198,550 of account payable to those under the 1996 Plan.

that vendor. There was no gain or loss on such stock grant.

Subject to any restrictions under federal or securities laws, the Chief Executive Officer may awardFor stock options to new non executive-officer employeesrequiring an assessment of value during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and consultants, with a market2018, the fair value at the time of hire equivalent to up to 100% of the employee’s annual salary or the consultant’s anticipated annual consulting fees. The Chief Executive Officer shall have the discretion to increase or decrease such awards based on market and recruiting factors subject to a limit per person in each case of options to purchase 50,000 shares. Additionally, on an annual basis, the Chief Executive Officer may grant continuing employees and consultants, based upon performance and objectives, a stock option for that number of shares upaward was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:

  2019  2018 
         
Risk-free interest rate  -%  2.64-2.89%
Expected dividend yield  -%  0%
Expected volatility  -%  186.07-222.64%
Expected life at date of issuance  -   5 years 

The expected life is estimated to 40% of the employee’s annual salary or the consultant’s annual fees, but not to exceed 50,000 shares per person per year. Any option grant exceeding 50,000 shares per person per year requires approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. These options shall be granted with an exercise price equal to the term of the common stock options issued in 2018.

The Company recognizes the fair market value of stock-based awards in general and administrative costs and in research and development costs, as appropriate, in the Company’s common stock on the dateconsolidated statements of issuance, have a ten-year term, vest annually over a three-year period from the dates of grant and have other terms consistent with the 2006 Plan.

Each non-employee director (other than those who serve on the Board of Directors to oversee an investment in the Company) is automatically granted options to purchase 30,000operations. The Company issues new shares of common stock upon commencement of service as a director and, each non-employee director is automatically granted additional options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock on the date of the first meeting of the Board of Directors for the relative calendar year. During 2009, the automatic annual grants to the non-employee directors were not issued until the stockholders approved an increase in the authorized shares available under the 2006 Plan at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in June 2009. Options to purchase an additional 30,000 shares of common stock were granted to the non-employee directors in August 2009. Stock option issuances to non-employee directors who serve on the Board of Directors to oversee an investment in the Company are determined separately. No non-employee directors currently serve in that capacity. The nonqualified options to non-employee directors have an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, have a ten-year term and vest annually over a three-year period from the dates of grant.

As of December 31, 2009, options to purchase an aggregate of 8,984,592 shares of common stock were exercisable under the Company’ssatisfy stock option plans. Duringand warrant exercises. There were no stock options exercised during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 20082019 and 2007,2018.

There were no warrants issued as compensation or for services during the Company did not issue options to purchase shares of common stock with exercise prices below the fair market value of the common stock on the dates of grant.

Stock option transactions under the Company’s stock option plans for thefiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 20082019 and 20092018 requiring such assessment. Warrants, if issued for services, are summarized below:

   Shares  Weighted Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
   

Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term

  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Balance, December 31, 2006

   9,767,156   $2.04      

Granted

   1,237,130    0.97      

Exercised

   (159,311  1.44      

Expired

   (484,814  1.99      

Forfeited

   (218,665  2.03      
          

Balance, December 31, 2007

   10,141,496   $1.92      

Granted

   1,817,000    0.64      

Exercised

   (22,750  0.38      

Expired

   (236,428  2.05      

Forfeited

   (144,999  1.23      
          

Balance, December 31, 2008

   11,554,319   $1.73      
          

Granted

   3,160,000    0.21      

Exercised

   —      —        

Expired

   (890,744  1.35      

Forfeited

   (285,077  1.09      
          

Balance, December 31, 2009

   13,538,498   $1.41    6.3 years  $0  
          

Exercisable, December 31, 2009

   8,984,592   $1.95    4.9 years  $0  
          

As of December 31, 2009, options availabletypically issued to placement agents or brokers for future grant under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan amounted to 411,969.

Information regarding stock options outstanding at December 31, 2009 is as follows:

       

Options Outstanding

   Options Exercisable 

Range of

exercise prices

  Number
outstanding at
December 31, 2009
   

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual life

  Weighted
average
exercise
price
   Number
exercisable at
December 31, 2009
   Weighted
average
exercise
price
 

$0.20 - $0.29

   3,160,000    9.6 years  $0.21     1,000    $0.29  

0.30 - 0.66

   1,887,630    8.0 years   0.59     880,220     0.61  

0.71 - 1.06

   1,725,899    3.9 years   0.82     1,472,566     0.80  

1.07 - 1.56

   1,472,229    6.9 years   1.26     1,373,899     1.27  

1.57 - 2.35

   1,489,624    4.7 years   2.24     1,453,791     2.26  

2.38 - 3.38

   3,773,167    4.3 years   2.81     3,773,167     2.81  

3.39 - 4.44

   29,949    2.3 years   4.34     29,949     4.34  
                
   13,538,498    6.3 years   1.41     8,984,592     1.95  
                

Stockholder Rights Plan

On February 5, 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the adoption of a Stockholder Rights Plan to protect stockholder interests against takeover strategies that mayfund raising services and are not provide maximum stockholder value. A dividend of one Right (each, a “Right” and, collectively, the “Rights”) for each outstanding shareissued from any of the Company’s common stock was distributedand option plans, from which options issued to stockholders of record on February 15, 2002. Each share of common stock presently outstanding and issued since February 15, 2002 also includes one Right. Each share of common stock that may be issued after the date hereof but prior to the Distribution Date (as defined below) will also include one Right. The Rights automatically attach to outstanding shares of common stock detailed above and no separate certificatesnon-employees for services are typically issued. The Rights trade only together with the Company’s common stock.

Each Right allows its holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share (a “Unit”) of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $75.00 per Unit. The Rights are not currently exercisable, but will become exercisable on the 10Income Taxesth business day following the occurrence of certain events relating to a person or group (“Acquiring Person”) acquiring or attempting to acquire fifteen percent (15%) or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Distribution Date”). If the Rights become exercisable, then any Rights held by the Acquiring Person are void. In such event, each other holder of a Right that has not been exercised will have the right upon exercise to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock (or common stock of the Acquiring Person in certain situations) having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. Unless redeemed or exchanged earlier by the Company, the Rights expire on February 15, 2012.

The Company has 35,000 shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock authorized (35,000,000 Units), of which no shares or Units are issued or outstanding at December 31, 2009. Each Unit would entitle the holder to (A) one vote, voting together with the shares of common stock; (B) in the event that the Company’s assets are liquidated, a payment of $1.00 or an amount equal to the payment to be distributed per share of common stock, whichever is greater; and (C) in the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which shares of common stock are exchanged, a payment in the amount equal to the payment received per share of common stock. The number of Rights per share of common stock, and the purchase price, are subject to adjustment in the event of each and any stock split, stock dividend or similar event.

Note 4 — Research and License Agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier

In October 2000, the Company entered into a research collaboration agreement and an exclusive license agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier. The agreements will allow Servier to develop and commercialize select AMPAKINE compounds for the treatment of (i) declines in cognitive performance associated with aging, (ii) neurodegenerative diseases and (iii) anxiety disorders. The indications covered include, but are not limited to, Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, sexual dysfunction, and the dementia associated with multiple sclerosis and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. In early December 2006, the Company terminated the research collaboration with Servier. However, the exclusive license agreement with Servier, as amended to date, will continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms for the three compounds selected by Servier at termination. The Company remains eligible for milestone payments based upon clinical development of the licensed compounds by Servier, and ultimately, royalties on worldwide product sales, if any. The territory covered by the exclusive license excludes North America, allowing the Company to retain commercialization rights in its domestic market. The territory covered by the exclusive license agreement also excludes South America (except Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela), Australia and New Zealand. The Company, as a result of the termination, recovered worldwide marketing rights for all of the indications originally licensed to Servier, other than three compounds retained by Servier for commercialization.

In connection with the agreements, Servier paid the Company a nonrefundable, up-front payment of $5,000,000. The upfront payment was amortized as revenue over the research support period, as extended by the amendments entered into in October 2002 and December 2003. The October 2000 agreements included research support through early December 2006, subject to the Company providing agreed-upon levels of research. The amount of support was subject to annual adjustment based upon the increase in the U.S. Department of Labor’s Consumer Price Index. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded research support from Servier of approximately $1,025,000. The agreements also include milestone payments based upon clinical development and royalty payments on sales in licensed territories.

In October 2002, Servier agreed to provide the Company with $4,000,000 of additional research support, in exchange for rights to the Company’s AMPAKINE compounds for the potential treatment of anxiety disorders, in Servier’s licensed territories. The $4,000,000 was received in quarterly installments of $500,000 over a two-year period, with the final payment received during the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

Note 5 — Research and License Agreement with NV Organon

In January 1999, the Company entered into a research collaboration and exclusive worldwide license agreement with NV Organon. The agreement will enable Organon to develop and commercialize the Company’s proprietary AMPAKINE technology for the treatment of schizophrenia and depression.

In connection with the Organon agreement, the Company received an up-front payment of $2,000,000. The agreement also included support of approximately $3,000,000 per year for the period from January 1999 through January 2001, during which time the Company provided research services to Organon.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000, the Company received its first milestone under the agreement, triggered when Organon selected an AMPAKINE compound to pursue in Phase I clinical testing as a potential treatment for schizophrenia. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, Organon notified the Company of its intent to continue developing the selected compound by entering Phase II clinical testing, triggering a second milestone payment of $2,000,000, which the Company received in September 2001. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, Organon paid the Company another $2,000,000 milestone in order to retain its rights to the Company’s AMPAKINE technology in the field of depression. The Company remains eligible for additional milestone payments based upon further clinical development of the licensed technology by Organon, and ultimately, royalties on worldwide product sales, if any. Unless terminated earlier, the agreement continues until the expiration of all of Organon’s royalty obligations, which continue until the expiration of patents covering the AMPAKINE technology or compounds licensed under the agreement.

In November 2007, Organon was acquired by Schering-Plough Corporation. Subsequently, in November 2009, Schering-Plough Corporation was acquired by Merck & Co. Inc.

Note 6 — Advance from the Institute for the Study of Aging

In June 2000, the Company received $247,300 from the Institute for the Study of Aging (the “Institute”) to fund testing of the Company’s AMPAKINE CX516 in patients with mild cognitive impairment (“MCI”). Patients with MCI represent the earliest clinically-defined group with memory impairment beyond that expected for normal individuals of the same age and education, but such patients do not meet the clinical criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. The Institute is a non-profit foundation based in New York City and dedicated to the improvement in quality of life for the elderly.

Provided that the Company complies with the conditions of the funding agreement, repayment of the advance shall be forgiven unless the Company enters one of its AMPAKINE compounds into Phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. Upon such potential clinical trials, repayment would include the principal amount plus accrued interest computed at a rate equal to one-half of the prime lending rate. In lieu of cash, in the event of repayment the Institute may elect to receive the outstanding principal balance and any accrued interest thereon as shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price for such form of repayment shall initially equal $4.50 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. Included in the balance sheet is accrued principal and interest of approximately $316,000 and $312,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Note 7 — Commitments

The Company leases its offices and research laboratories under an operating lease that expires May 31, 2012. The related lease agreement includes scheduled rent increases that are recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Subject to certain conditions, the lease provides the Company an option to extend the term of the lease for three one-year periods at the prevailing market rental rate at the time any extension is set to commence. Rent expense under this lease for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $536,000, $500,000 and $511,000, respectively. Commitments under the lease for the years ending December 31, 2010, 2011 and the five months ending May 31, 2012 are approximately $556,000, $581,000 and $248,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company has employment agreements with three of its executive officers that involve annual salary payments approximating $786,000 and provide for bonuses under certain circumstances. The agreements expire in May 2010, August 2010 and August 2011.

The Company has entered into severance agreements with each of its executive officers. In the event of a termination of employment, under certain circumstances, these severance agreements provide defined benefits to the executive officers, including compensation equal to 12 months of the executive officer’s then current salary.

In March 2009, each of the Company’s executive officers agreed to a 20% reduction in their base salary in an effort to conserve the Company’s financial resources. Following the proceeds from the transaction with Biovail in March 2010 (see Note 10), the Company believes it is reasonably possible that some of the reduced salary amounts will be restored to the executive officers, but at this time the amount of such restoration cannot be reasonably estimated and such determination is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Additionally, in March 2009 the Company’s executive officers and other key personnel entered into retention bonus agreements to foster the continuous employment of such individuals. Under such agreements, the employee will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash bonus equal to an additional six (6) months of the employee’s base salary in the event of a change in control of the Company, subject to certain circumstances. Such payments would be based upon the employee’s base salary prior to the voluntary adjustments made by each of the Company’s executive officers, as explained more fully above.

Commitments for services to be rendered for preclinical and clinical studies amount to approximately $1,225,000. Separately, commitments under sponsored research agreements for services to be rendered approximated $47,000, all of which is payable within the next twelve months.

The Company has entered agreements with an academic institution that provide the Company exclusive rights to certain of the technologies that the Company is developing. Under the terms of the agreements, the Company is committed to royalty payments. These payments include minimum annual royalties of approximately $70,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for each year thereafter for the remaining life of the patents covering the subject technologies. The date of the last to expire patent related to the subject technologies currently is April 2019. The agreements commit the Company to spend a minimum of $250,000 per year to advance the AMPAKINE compounds until the Company begins marketing an AMPAKINE compound. The agreements also commit the Company to pay up to an additional $875,000 upon achievement of certain clinical testing and regulatory approval milestones, and to remit a portion of certain remuneration received in connection with sublicensing agreements.

Note 8 — Related Party Transactions

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company paid or accrued scientific and other consulting fees to directors and/or stockholders aggregating approximately $91,000, $160,000 and $160,000, respectively. Under certain circumstances, the Company is obligated to make royalty payments to certain of its scientific consultants, some of whom are stockholders, upon successful commercialization of certain of its products by the Company or its licensees.

Note 9 — Income Taxes

The Company uses the liability method of accountingaccounts for income taxes as set forth in ASC 740 (formerly Statementunder an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected impact of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”)). Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on differences between the financial statementstatements and the tax basesbasis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had federal and California tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $85,677,000 and $73,231,000, respectively. The difference between the federal and California tax loss carryforwards is primarily attributable to the capitalization of research and development expenses for California franchise tax purposes. The federal and California net operating loss carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2010 through 2029. liabilities.

The Company also has federal and California research and development tax credit carryforwards totaling approximately $2,269,000 and $1,931,000, respectively. The federal research and development tax credit carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2010 through 2029. The California research and development tax credit carryforward does not expire and will carry forward indefinitely until utilized.

The Company’s effective tax rate is different from the federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to operating losses that receive no tax benefit as a result ofrecords a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded foramount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be credited to operations in the period such losses.determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383, use of the Company’s net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be limited if a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% occurs within any three-year period since the last ownership change. The Company may have had a change in control under these Sections. However, the Company does not anticipate performing a complete analysis of the limitation on the annual use of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards until the time that it projectsanticipates it will be able to utilize these tax attributes.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are shown below. A valuation allowance of $41,198,000 as of December 31, 2009 has been established against the Company’s deferred tax assets as realization of such assets is uncertain. The increase in the valuation allowance of $1,976,000 from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009 relates primarily to continuing net operating losses.

Deferred tax assets consist of the following:

 

   December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2008
 

Net operating loss carryforwards

  $34,182,000   $32,519,000  

Research and development credits

   3,524,000    3,037,000  

Capitalized research and development costs

   1,082,000    1,286,000  

Non-cash stock-based compensation

   2,238,000    2,136,000  

Depreciation

   —      81,000  

Other, net

   172,000    163,000  
         

Net deferred tax assets

   41,198,000    39,222,000  

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

   (41,198,000  (39,222,000
         

Total deferred tax assets

  $—     $—    
         

In July 2006, the FASB issued guidance which clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”). This guidance prescribed a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance also addressed derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. These provisions were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The cumulative effect, if any, of applying these provisions is to be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption. The impact of the Company’s reassessment of its tax positions in accordance with this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. The provisions of this guidance have been incorporated into ASC 740-10.

As of December 31, 2009,2019, the Company doesdid not have any unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters. The Company will recognize accrued interestmatters and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state tax jurisdictions. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2006 through 2009. The Company and its subsidiaries’ state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ended December 31, 2005 through 2009. The Company does not anticipate any material amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income taxes and income taxes of various state tax jurisdictions. As the Company’s net operating losses have yet to be utilized, all previous tax years remain open to examination by Federal authorities and other jurisdictions in which the Company currently operates or has operated in the past.

The Company accounts for uncertainties in income tax law under a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns as prescribed by GAAP. The tax effects of a position are recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority as of the reporting date. If the tax position is not considered “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, then no benefits of the position are recognized. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had not recorded any liability for uncertain tax positions. In subsequent periods, any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be recognized as a component of income tax expense.

F-14

Note 10 — Subsequent Event

Foreign Currency Transactions

The note payable to SY Corporation, which is denominated in a foreign currency (the South Korean Won), is translated into the Company’s functional currency (the United States Dollar) at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. The foreign currency exchange gain or loss resulting from translation is recognized in the related consolidated statements of operations.

Research and Development

Research and development costs include compensation paid to management directing the Company’s research and development activities, including but not limited to compensation paid to our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim President who is also our Chief Scientific Officer and fees paid to consultants and outside service providers and organizations (including research institutes at universities), and other expenses relating to the acquisition, design, development and clinical testing of the Company’s treatments and product candidates.

License Agreements

Obligations incurred with respect to mandatory payments provided for in license agreements are recognized ratably over the appropriate period, as specified in the underlying license agreement, and are recorded as liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding charge to research and development costs in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. Obligations incurred with respect to milestone payments provided for in license agreements are recognized when it is probable that such milestone will be reached and are recorded as liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding charge to research and development costs in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. Payments of such liabilities are made in the ordinary course of business.

Patent Costs

Due to the significant uncertainty associated with the successful development of one or more commercially viable products based on the Company’s research efforts and any related patent applications, all patent costs, including patent-related legal and filing fees, are expensed as incurred and are charged to general and administrative expenses.

Earnings per Share

The Company’s computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) includes basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (e.g., warrants and options) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders consists of net income or loss, as adjusted for actual and deemed preferred stock dividends declared, amortized or accumulated.

Loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted loss per common share is the same for all periods presented because all warrants and stock options outstanding are anti-dilutive.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company excluded the outstanding securities summarized below, which entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock, from its calculation of earnings per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Series B convertible preferred stock  11   11 
Convertible notes payable  7,017,896   16,319 
Common stock warrants  2,191,043   1,783,229 
Common stock options  4,344,994   4,344,994 
Total  13,553,944   6,144,553 

Reclassifications

Certain comparative figures in 2018 have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications were immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010,March 2020, The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-03, Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments. There are seven issues addressed in this update. Issues 1 – 5 were clarifications and codifications of previous updates. Issue 3 relates only to depository and lending institutions and therefore would not be applicable to the Company. Issue 6 was a clarification on determining the contractual term of a net investment in a lease for purposes of measuring expected credit losses, an issue not applicable to the Company. Issue 7 relates to the regaining control of financial assets sold and the recordation of an allowance for credit losses. The amendment related to issues 1, 2, 4 and 5 become effective immediately upon adoption of the update. Issue 3 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Issues 6 and 7 become effective on varying dates that relate to the dates of adoption other updates. Management’s initial analysis is that it does not believe the new guidance will substantially impact the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2019, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2019-08, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)-Codification Improvements-Share-Based Consideration Payable to a Customer. The update provides measurement guidance that when share-based consideration is granted to a customer, it is treated as a reduction is the transaction price and that the amount recorded as the reduction should be based on the grant-date fair value of the share-based payment award. For entities that have not yet adopted the amendments in Accounting Standards Update 2018-07, the amendments of this update are effective for public entities in fiscal years beginning after December 14, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management’s initial analysis is that it does not believe the new guidance will substantially impact the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” The amendments in this update modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. These amendments affect the disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments. See Note 3. Summary of Significant Account Policies – Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Management has not concluded its evaluation of the guidance. Its initial analysis is that it does not believe the new guidance will substantially impact the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-07 (“ASU 2018-07”), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718)—Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2018-07 are amendments to Topic 718 that become effective for public entities like the Company completedfor fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. This update applies to nonemployee share-based awards within the scope of Topic 718. Consistent with the accounting requirement for employee share-based payment awards, nonemployee share-based payment awards are measured at grant-date fair value of the equity instruments that an entity is obligated to issue when the good has been delivered or the service has been rendered and any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied. Equity- classified nonemployee share- based payment awards are measured at the grant date. The definition of the term grant date has been amended to generally state the date at which a private placementgrantor and a grantee reach a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of a share- based payment award. An entity considers the probability of satisfying performance conditions when nonemployee share-based payment awards contain such conditions. This is consistent with the treatment for employee-based awards. Generally, the classification of equity- classified nonemployee share-based payment awards will continue to be subject to the requirements of Topic 718 unless modified after the good has been delivered, the service has been rendered, any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied, and the nonemployee is no longer providing goods or services. This eliminates the requirement to reassess classification of such awards upon vesting. This standard will change the valuation of applicable awards granted in subsequent periods.

4. Notes Payable

Convertible Notes Payable

On November 4, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note (the “November 2019 Convertible Note”) bearing interest at 10% per year. The maturity amount is $170,000 and it matures on November 4, 2020. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $14,000, which included $8,500 of lender legal fees and $5,500 in placement agency fees paid to Aurora Capital LLC, a registered broker-dealer and an affiliate of the Company. The transaction included a $13,600 original issue discount. The transaction did not include any warrants or commitment shares. The net proceeds to the Company directly from the lender was $147,900, from which the Company then directly paid the $5,500 placement agency fee for final net proceeds of $142,400. Subject to certain limitations and adjustments as described in the November 2019 Convertible Note, the holder may convert the November 2019 Convertible Note at a fixed conversion price of $0.50 per share of common stock, provided that from the date that is six months after the issuance date, the conversion price shall be 60% multiplied by the lowest closing price of the common stock during the twenty (20) consecutive trading days prior to conversion. The Company evaluated all of the terms of the November 2019 Convertible Note and determined that, in accordance with ASC 815, there were no derivatives to be bifurcated or separately valued. However, there were three features of the November 2019 Convertible Note and the related securities purchase agreement that required valuation. They were: (i) the debt issuance costs of $14,000, (ii) the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature, and (iii) the original issue discount of $13,600. The amount to be recorded initially as the amount of the November 2019 Convertible Note was calculated by determining the relative values as percentages of the net proceeds of the November 2019 Convertible Note ($142,400), the beneficial conversion feature ($142,400) The debt issuance costs, original issue discount and the amount recorded as the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature each are being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the life the November 2019 Convertible Note.

F-16

The table below provides a summary of the November 2019 Convertible Note as of December 31, 2019.

Principal amount of note payable $170,000 
Debt discounts, net of amortization of $26,940  (143,060)
Accrued coupon interest  2,701 
  $29,641 

On October 22, 2019, the Company issued a convertible note (the “October 2019 Convertible Note”) bearing interest at 10% per year. The maturity amount is $60,000 and it matures on July 22, 2020. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $3,750 for lender legal fees and due diligence fees. The transaction included a $1,750 original issue discount, a warrant to purchase 175,000 shares of common stock and 10,000 Commitment Shares (as such term is defined in the definitive transaction documents), which were issued in connection with the October 2019 Convertible Note. The net proceeds to the Company were $54,500. Subject to certain limitations and adjustments as described in the October 2019 Convertible Note, the holder may convert the October 2019 Convertible Note at a fixed conversion price of $0.50 per share of common stock, provided that from the date that is six months after the issuance date, the conversion price shall be 60% multiplied by the lowest trading price of the common stock during the twenty (20) consecutive trading days prior to conversion considering only trades of 100 shares of common stock or more. The Company evaluated all of the terms of the October 2019 Convertible Note and determined that, in accordance with ASC 815, there were no derivatives to be bifurcated or separately valued. However, there were five features of the October 2019 Convertible Note and the related securities purchase agreement that required valuation. They were: (i) the debt issuance costs of $3,750, (ii) the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature, (iii) the value of the warrant, (iv) the original issue discount of $1,750, and (v) the value of the Commitment Shares. The Company valued the warrant using the Black-Scholes valuation method utilizing the following assumptions: (i) exercise price of $0.50, (ii) stock price of $0.31, (iii) life of five years, (iv) five-year risk free rate of 1.60% and (v) volatility of 476.01% that results in the value of one warrant of $0.310 and a total warrant value of $54,250. The amount to be recorded initially as the amount of the October 2019 Convertible Note was then calculated by determining the relative values as percentages of the net proceeds of the October 2019 Convertible Note ($54,500), and the warrant (46.23% or $27,738) and the Commitment Shares (2.64% or $1,585). The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature was then calculated based on the value attributed to the October 2019 Convertible Note. The debt issuance costs, original issue discount and the amount recorded as the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature each are being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the life the October 2019 Convertible Note.

The table below provides a summary of the October 2019 Convertible Note as of December 31, 2019.

Principal amount of note payable $60,000 
Debt discounts, net of amortization of $16,490  (47,512)
Accrued coupon interest  1,167 
  $13,655 

On August 19, 2019, the Company issued a convertible note (the “August 2019 Convertible Note”) bearing interest at 10% per year. The maturity amount is $55,000 and it matures on May 19, 2020. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $2,500 for lender legal fees. The transaction included a $5,000 original issue discount, a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock and 7,500 Commitment Shares (as such term is defined in the definitive transaction documents), which were issued in connection with the August 2019 Convertible Note. The net proceeds to the Company were $47,500. Subject to certain limitations and adjustments as described in the August 2019 Convertible Note, the holder may convert the August 2019 Convertible Note at a fixed conversion price of $0.50 per share of common stock, provided that from the date that is six months after the issuance date, the conversion price shall be the lower of (a) $0.50 or (b) 60% multiplied by the lowest closing price of the common stock during the twenty (20) consecutive trading days prior to conversion. The Company evaluated all of the terms of the August 2019 Convertible Note and determined that, in accordance with ASC 815, there were no derivatives to be bifurcated or separately valued. However, there were five features of the August 2019 Convertible Note and the related securities purchase agreement that required valuation. They were: (i) the debt issuance costs of $2,500, (ii) the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature, (iii) the value of the warrant, (iv) the original issue discount of $5,000, and (v) the value of the Commitment Shares. The Company amortizes each of these five on a straight-line basis over the life of the August 2019 Convertible Note. The Company valued the warrant using the Black-Scholes valuation method utilizing the following assumptions: (i) exercise price of $0.50, (ii) stock price of $0.65, (iii) life of five years, (iv) five-year risk free rate of 1.47% and (v) volatility of 175.5% that results in the value of one warrant of $0.623 and a total warrant value of $93,450. The amount to be recorded initially as the amount of the August 2019 Convertible Note was then calculated by determining the relative values as percentages of the net proceeds of the August 2019 Convertible Note ($47,500) and the warrant (64.08% or $30,440) and the Commitment Shares (3.34% or $1,588). The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature was then calculated based on the value attributed to the August 2019 Convertible Note. The debt issuance costs, original issue discount and the amount recorded as the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature each are being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the life the August 2019 Convertible Note.

The table below provides a summary of the August 2019 Convertible Note as of December 31, 2019.

Principal amount of note payable $55,000 
Debt discounts, net of amortization of $27,781  (27,218)
Accrued coupon interest  2,034 
  $29,816 

On May 17, 2019, the Company issued a master convertible note (the “May 2019 Convertible Note”) issuable in tranches, bearing interest at 10% per year, bearing a maximum maturity amount of $150,000. The first tranche has a maturity amount of $50,000 and matures on May 17, 2020. There was a stated original issue discount of $5,000 and the Company incurred debt issuance costs of $2,000 for lender legal fees. The net proceeds to the Company were $43,000. Subject to certain limitations and adjustments as described in the May 2019 Convertible Note, the holder may convert from the date of issuance to the maturity date, part or all of the May 2019 Convertible Note, inclusive of accrued interest, into the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion price that is the lesser of (i) lowest trading price as such term is defined in the May 2019 Convertible Note (the lowest closing bid price) in the twenty five day trading period prior to the date of the May 2019 Convertible Note (which price is now fixed at $0.25, the closing bid price on May 16, 2019), or (ii) the variable conversion price (as defined in the May 2019 Convertible Note) which is 61% of the market price (as defined in the May 2019 Convertible Note). The market price is the lowest trading price (closing bid) in the twenty-five day trading day period up to the day prior to the conversion. If at any time while the May 2019 Convertible Note is outstanding, the conversion price is equal to or lower than $0.35, then an additional eleven percent (11%) discount is to be factored into the conversion price until the May 2019 Convertible Note is no longer outstanding (resulting in a discount rate of 50% assuming no other adjustments are triggered). The lowest trading price on the date of inception of the May 2019 Convertible Note ($0.25) and the lowest market price were both below $0.35, the effective conversion rate on the inception date was $0.125. Therefore, on the inception date, the first tranche would have converted into 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company evaluated all of the terms of the May 2019 Convertible Note and determined that, in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 815, there were no derivatives to be bifurcated or separately valued. However, there were four features of the May 2019 Convertible Note, the related securities purchase agreement and the warrant that was issued in connection therewith that required valuation. They were: (i) the original issue discount of $5,000, (ii) the debt issuance costs of $2,000, (iii) the beneficial conversion feature and (iv) the value of the warrant. The Company evaluated (iii) the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature for a calculated value of $286,000 (($0.84 closing price minus $0.125 conversion price) x 400,000 shares). The Company calculated the warrant value using the Black-Scholes valuation method, utilizing the following assumptions: (a) exercise price of $1.18 per share, (b) stock price $0.84, (c) three year life (d) three year risk free rate of 2.15% and (e) volatility of 210.19% and determined that the value of one warrant was $0.774 and the total warrant value was $32,796 for the warrant exercisable into 42,373 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001. The amount to be recorded initially as the amount of the May 2019 Convertible Note was then calculated by determining the relative values as percentages of the net proceeds of the May 2019 Convertible Note ($50,000)and the warrant ($32,796). The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature was then calculated based on the value attributed to the May 2019 Convertible Note. The original issue discount, debt issuance costs, the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature and proceeds allocated to the value of the warrant are being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the life the May 2019 Convertible Note. On December 9, 2019 the holder of the May 2019 Convertible Note converted $4,554 of principal amount into 130,000 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.0408 per share).

The table below provides a summary of the May 2019 Convertible Note as of December 31, 2019.

Principal amount of note payable after payment of $4,554 of principal $45,446 
Debt discounts, net of amortization of $33,040  (17,181)
Accrued coupon interest  3,108 
  $31,373 

On April 24, 2019, the Company issued a convertible note (“the April 2019 Convertible Note”) bearing interest at 10% per year. The maturity amount is $58,500 and matures on the one-year anniversary which is April 24, 2020. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $3,500 for lender legal and due diligence fees. There was no stated original issue discount and no warrants were issued in connection with the April 2019 Convertible Note. The net proceeds to the Company were $55,000. Subject to certain limitations and adjustments as described in the April 2019 Convertible Note, the holder may, from the date that is one hundred eighty (180) days after the issuance to the maturity date, convert part or all of the April 2019 Convertible Note, inclusive of accrued interest, into the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion price that is 61% of the market price as defined in the April 2019 Convertible Note. The market price is the lowest trading price, which in turn is the lowest closing bid price in the twenty (20) trading days prior to conversion. The lowest closing bid price in the twenty (20) day period prior to inception was $0.65 which would calculate to a $0.3964 conversion price and further calculate to 147,541 conversion shares to be issued. The Company evaluated all of the terms of the April 2019 Convertible Note and determined that, in accordance with ASC 815, there were no derivatives to be bifurcated or separately valued. However, there were two features of the April 2019 Convertible Note and the related securities purchase agreement that required valuation. They were: (i) the debt issuance costs of $3,500, and (ii) the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature. The Company evaluated (ii) as the closing price on the inception date minus the conversion price multiplied by the number of conversion shares and determined that the beneficial conversion feature had an intrinsic value of $44,950 (($0.701 closing price minus $0.3964 conversion price) x 147,541 shares). The debt issuance costs and the amount recorded as the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature are each being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the life the April 2019 Convertible Note. On November 12, 2019 the holder of the April 2019 Convertible Note converted $10,000 of principal amount into 81,967 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.1220 per share). On October 28, 2019 the same holder converted $10,000 of principal amount of $1,500,000the April 2019 Convertible Note into 73,529 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.1360 per share). (See Note 10. Subsequent Events).

The table below provides a summary of the April 2019 Convertible Note as of December 31, 2019.

Principal amount of note payable after payment of $20,000 of principal $38,500 
Debt discounts, net of amortization of $37,762  (10,688)
Accrued coupon interest  4,257 
  $32,069 

On January 2, 2019, February 27, 2019, March 6, 2019 and March 14, 2019, the Company issued convertible notes (each a “2019 Q1 Convertible Note and collectively, the “2019 Q1 Convertible Notes”) bearing interest at 10% per year. The 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes issued on January 2, 2019 matured on February 28, 2019 with a single accredited institutionalface amount of $10,000. The 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes issued on February 27, 2019, March 6, 2019 and March 14, 2019 matured on April 30, 2019 with an aggregate face amount of $100,000. Investors who purchased 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes also received an aggregate of 110,000 common stock purchase warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black Scholes option pricing model calculated on the date of each grant and had an aggregate value of $78,780. Total value received by the investors was $188,780, the sum of the face value of the convertible note and the value of the warrant. Therefore, the Company recorded a debt discount associated with the warrant issuance of $45,812 and an initial value of the convertible notes of $64,188 using the relative fair value method. An additional $9,464 of interest expense was recorded based upon the 10% annual rate for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, none of the 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes were paid and each remained outstanding and continued to accrue interest. Although the 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes are in default, the Company has not received any notices of default from any of the note holders. The 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes have no reset rights or other protections based on subsequent equity transactions, equity-linked transactions or other events other than the right, but not the obligation, for each investor to convert or exchange his or her 2019 Q1 Convertible Note, but not the warrant, into the next exempt private securities offering. The April 2019 Convertible Note, the May 2019 Convertible Note, the August 2019 Convertible Note, the October 2019 Convertible Note and the November 2019 Convertible Note, which the Company does not consider to have arisen from offerings, may be interpreted in such a way that the 2019 Q1 Convertible Note Holders have the right to convert or exchange. However, no holders of 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes requested a conversion or exchange in connection with the issuance of such notes. The Company does not believe that an offering occurred as of December 31, 2019 or as of the date of the issuance of these financial statements. Therefore, the number of shares of common stock (or preferred stock) into which the 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes may convert is not determinable and the Company has not accounted for any additional consideration. The warrants to purchase 110,000 shares of common stock issued in connection with the sale of the 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes are exercisable at a fixed price of $1.50 per share of common stock, provide no right to receive a cash payment, and included no reset rights or other protections based on subsequent equity transactions, equity-linked transactions or other events. The Company determined that there were no embedded derivatives to be identified, bifurcated and valued in connection with the 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes.

During December 2018, convertible notes (“2018 Convertible Notes”) bearing interest at 10% per year and maturing on February 28, 2019 and warrants were sold to investors with an aggregate face amount of $80,000. Investors also received 80,000 common stock purchase warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black Scholes option pricing model calculated on the date of each grant and had an aggregate value of $68,025. Total value received by the investors was $148,025, the sum of the face value of the 2018 Convertible Notes and the value of the warrant. Therefore, the Company recorded a debt discount associated with the issuance of the warrants of $36,347 and an initial value of the 2018 Convertible Notes of $43,653 using the relative fair value method. An additional $8,111 and $401 of interest expense was recorded based upon the 10% annual rate for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively. The 2018 Convertible Notes matured on February 28, 2019, were not paid, remain outstanding and continue to accrue interest. Although the 2018 Convertible Notes are in default, the Company has not received any notices of default from any of the note holders. The 2018 Convertible Notes have no reset rights or other protections based on subsequent equity transactions, equity-linked transactions or other events other than the right, but not the obligation for each investor to convert or exchange his or her 2018 Convertible Note, but not the warrant, into the next exempt private securities offering. The May 2019 Convertible Note and April 2019 Convertible Note, which the Company does not consider to have arisen from an offering, may be interpreted in such a way that the 2019 Q1 Convertible Note Holders have the right to convert or exchange. However, no holders of such notes have requested a conversion or exchange. The Company does not believe that an offering occurred as of December 31, 2019 or as of the date of the issuance of these financial statements. Therefore, the number of shares of common stock (or preferred stock) into which the 2018 Convertible Notes may convert is not determinable and the Company has not accounted for any additional consideration. The warrants to purchase 80,000 shares of common stock issued in connection with the sale of the 2018 Convertible Notes are exercisable at a fixed price of $1.50 per share of common stock, provide no right to receive a cash payment, and included no reset rights or other protections based on subsequent equity transactions, equity-linked transactions or other events. The Company determined that there were no embedded derivatives to be identified, bifurcated and valued in connection with this financing.

The 2018 Convertible Notes and 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes consist of the following at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

  

December 31, 2019

  

December 31, 2018

 
Principal amount of notes payable $190,000  $80,000 
Discount associated with issuance of warrants net of amortization of $82,159 as of December 31, 2019 and $8,379 as of December 31, 2018  -   (27,968)
Accrued interest payable  17,976   401 
  $207,976  $52,433 

Convertible notes were also sold to investors in 2014 and 2015 (“Original Convertible Notes), which aggregated a total of $579,500, had a fixed interest rate of 10% per annum and those that remain outstanding are convertible into common stock at a fixed price of $11.3750 per share. The Original Convertible Notes have no reset rights or other protections based on subsequent equity transactions, equity-linked transactions or other events. The warrants to purchase 50,945 shares of common stock issued in connection with the sale of the convertible notes have either been exchanged as part of April and May 2016 note and warrant exchange agreements or expired on September 15, 2016.

The maturity date of the Original Convertible Notes was extended to September 15, 2016 and included the issuance of 27,936 additional warrants to purchase common stock, exercisable at $11.375 per share of common stock, which expired on September 15, 2016.

The remaining outstanding Original Convertible Notes (including those for which default notices have been received) consist of the following at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Principal amount of notes payable $125,000  $125,000 
Accrued interest payable  82,060   62,233 
  $207,060  $187,233 

As of December 31, 2019, principal and accrued interest on the Original Convertible Note that is subject to a default notice accrues annual interest at 12% instead of 10%, totaled $43,666, of which $18,666 was accrued interest. As of December 31, 2018, principal and accrued interest on Original Convertible Notes subject to default notices totaled $38,292 of which $13,292 was accrued interest.

As of December 31, 2019 all of the outstanding Original Convertible Notes, inclusive of accrued interest, were convertible into an aggregate of 18,204 shares of the Company’s common stock, including 7,217 shares attributable to accrued interest of $82,060 payable as of such date. As of December 31, 2018, the outstanding Original Convertible Notes were convertible into 16,460 shares of the Company’s common stock, including 5,471 shares attributable to accrued interest of $62,233 payable as of such date. Such Original Convertible Notes will continue to accrue interest until exchanged, paid or otherwise discharged. There can be no assurance that any of the additional holders of the remaining Original Convertible Notes will exchange their notes.

Note Payable to SY Corporation Co., Ltd.

On June 25, 2012, the Company borrowed 465,000,000 Won (the currency of South Korea, equivalent to approximately $400,000 United States Dollars) from and executed a secured note payable to SY Corporation Co., Ltd., formerly known as Samyang Optics Co., Ltd. (“Samyang”SY Corporation”), an approximately 20% common stockholder of Korea.the Company at that time. SY Corporation was a significant stockholder and a related party at the time of the transaction, but has not been a significant stockholder or related party of the Company subsequent to December 31, 2014. The promissory note accrues simple interest at the rate of 6%12% per annum and may be converted into unregisteredhad a maturity date of June 25, 2013. The Company has not made any payments on the promissory note. At June 30, 2013 and subsequently, the promissory note was outstanding and in default, although SY Corporation has not issued a notice of default or a demand for repayment. The Company believes that SY Corporation is in default of its obligations under its January 2012 license agreement, as amended, with the Company, but the Company has not yet issued a notice of default. The Company intends to continue efforts towards a comprehensive resolution of the aforementioned matters involving SY Corporation.

The promissory note is secured by collateral that represents a lien on certain patents owned by the Company, including composition of matter patents for certain of the Company’s high impact AMPAkine compounds and the low impact AMPAkine compounds CX2007 and CX2076, and other related compounds. The security interest does not extend to the Company’s patents for its AMPAkine compounds CX1739 and CX1942, or to the patent for the use of AMPAkine compounds for the treatment of respiratory depression.

Note payable to SY Corporation consists of the following at December 31, 2019 and 2018:

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Principal amount of note payable $399,774  $399,774 
Accrued interest payable  363,280   315,307 
Foreign currency transaction adjustment  3,182   29,360 
  $766,236  $744,441 

Interest expense with respect to this promissory note was $47,971 and $47,973 for years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Advances from and Notes Payable to Officers

On January 29, 2016, Dr. Arnold S. Lippa, the Company’s Interim President, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, advanced $52,600 to the Company for working capital purposes under a demand promissory note with interest at 10% per annum. On September 23, 2016, Dr. Lippa advanced $25,000 to the Company for working capital purposes under a second demand promissory note with interest at 10% per annum. The notes are secured by the assets of the Company. Additionally, on April 9, 2018, Dr. Lippa advanced another $50,000 to the Company as discussed in more detail below. In connection with the loans, Dr. Lippa was issued fully vested warrants to purchase 15,464 shares of the Company’s common stock, at Samyang’s election at any time after April 15, 2010 and on or before the January 15, 2011 maturity date (the “maturity date”).

Prior to and no less than three months before the maturity date, Samyang has the option to elect repayment10,309 of the note in cash, which repayment would be made by the Company within three months after the maturity date. Additionally, the Company may elect to prepay any portionhave an exercise price of the amount due under the note prior to the maturity date, however, any prepaid principal amount will include a prepayment fee equal to the difference between the interest accrued on such amount to the prepayment date and the interest that would have accrued to the maturity date if such amount had not been prepaid. Any amounts outstanding under the note that have not been converted or elected to be repaid shall automatically convert into unregistered shares of common stock after the close of business on the maturity date. The number of common shares issuable upon conversion of the promissory note shall be based upon the greater of: (i) $0.134$5.1025 per share or (ii)and 5,155 of which have an amount representing a 15% discount toexercise price of $4.85 which were the five-day volume weighted average closing priceprices of the Company’s common stock immediately prioron the respective dates of grant. The warrants expired on January 29, 2019 and September 23, 2019, respectively.

On February 2, 2016, Dr. James S. Manuso, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, advanced $52,600 to the conversion dateCompany for working capital purposes under a demand promissory note with interest at 10% per annum. On September 22, 2016, Dr. Manuso, advanced $25,000 to the Company for working capital purposes under a demand promissory note with interest at 10% per annum. The notes are secured by the assets of the promissory note.

Company. Additionally, on April 9, 2018, Dr. Manuso advanced another $50,000 to the Company as discussed in more detail below. In connection with any conversion of the promissory note, the Company is obligated to issue to Samyang two-yearloans, Dr. Manuso was issued fully vested warrants to purchase additional unregistered13,092 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing 40%8,092 of which have an exercise price of $6.50 per share and 5,000 of which have an exercise price of $5.00, which were the closing market prices of the Company’s common stock on the respective dates of grant. The warrants expired on February 2, 2019 and September 22, 2019, respectively.

On April 9, 2018, Dr. Arnold S. Lippa, the Company’s Interim President, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors and Dr. James S. Manuso, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, advanced $50,000 each, for a total of $100,000, to the Company for working capital purposes. Each note is payable on demand after June 30, 2018. Each note was subject to a mandatory exchange provision that provided that the principal amount of the note would be mandatorily exchanged into a board approved offering of the Company’s securities, if such offering held its first closing on or before June 30, 2018 and the amount of proceeds from such first closing was at least $150,000, not including the principal amounts of the notes that would be exchanged, or $250,000 including the principal amounts of such notes. Upon such exchange, the notes would be deemed repaid and terminated. Any accrued but unpaid interest outstanding at the time of such exchange will be (i) repaid to the note holder or (ii) invested in the offering, at the note holder’s election. A first closing did not occur on or before June 30, 2018. Dr. Arnold S. Lippa agreed to exchange his note into the board approved offering that had its initial closing on September 12, 2018. Accrued interest on Dr. Lippa’s note was not exchanged. As of December 31, 2019, Dr. James S. Manuso had not exchanged his note.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, Dr. Lippa advanced on an interest free basis the Company $38,000 of which $13,000 was repaid to Dr. Lippa. The outstanding balance of the advance is payable on demand.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repaid $1,000 to Jeff Margolis related to $6,500 of interest free advances Mr. Margolis made to the Company during the year ended December 2018. The outstanding balance of the advance is payable on demand.

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, $10,272 and $11,268 was charged to interest expense with respect to Dr. Lippa’s notes, respectively.

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, $15,416 and $12,769 was charged to interest expense with respect to Dr. James S. Manuso’s notes, respectively.

As of September 30, 2018, Dr. James S. Manuso resigned his executive officer positions and as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. All of the interest expense noted above for 2019 was incurred while Dr. Manuso was no longer an officer. With respect to the year ended December 31, 2019, of the $12,769 of interest expense noted above, $3,564 was incurred while Dr. Manuso was no longer an officer.

Other Short-Term Notes Payable

Other short-term notes payable at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 consisted of premium financing agreements with respect to various insurance policies. At December 31, 2019, a premium financing agreement was payable in the initial amount of $61,746, with interest at 9% per annum, in ten monthly installments of $7,120, and another premium financing arrangement was payable in the initial amount of $9,322 payable in equal quarterly installments. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the aggregate amount of the short-term notes payable was $4,635 and $8,907 respectively.

5. Settlement and Payment Agreements

On December 16, 2019, RespireRx and Salamandra, LLC (“Salamandra”) entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the settlement agreement and release, executed August 21, 2019 (the “Original Settlement Agreement” and as amended, the “Amended Settlement Agreement”) regarding $202,395 owed by the Company to Salamandra (as reduced by any further payments by the Company to Salamandra, the “Full Amount”) in connection with an arbitration award previously granted in favor of Salamandra in the Superior Court of New Jersey. Under the terms of the Original Settlement Agreement, the Company was to pay Salamandra $125,000 on or before November 30, 2019 in full satisfaction of the Full Amount owed, subject to conditions regarding the Company’s ability to raise certain dollar amounts of working capital. Under the Amended Settlement Agreement, (i) the Company must pay and the Company paid to Salamandra $25,000 on or before December 21, 2019, (ii) upon such payment, Salamandra ceased all collection efforts against the Company until March 31, 2020 (the “Threshold Date”), and (iii) the Company must pay to Salamandra $100,000 on or before the Threshold Date if the Company has at that time raised $600,000 in working capital. Such payments by the Company would constitute satisfaction of the Full Amount owed and would serve as consideration for the dismissal of the action underlying the arbitration award and the mutual releases set forth in the Amended Settlement Agreement. If the Company raises less than $600,000 in working capital before the Threshold Date, the Company may pay to Salamandra an amount equal to 21% of the working capital amount raised, in which case such payment will reduce the Full Amount owed on a dollar-for-dollar basis, and Salamandra may then seek collection on the remainder of the debt. The Company did not make the requirement payment on March 31, 2020 and has initiated further discussions with the intent of reaching a revised settlement agreement which cannot be assured.

In February 2020, the Company and a vendor agreed to discuss amendments to an agreement in principal reached on September 23, 2019, whereby the Company and a vendor agreed in principle to a proposed settlement agreement, which has not resulted in a formal agreement. The discussions included, among other things, an extension of time to raise the amount discussed below. The September 23, 2019 agreement in principal calls for no reduction in the overall amount to be paid by the Company, which amount is not in dispute, but addresses only a payment schedule. The agreement in principal calls for a payment of a minimum of $100,000 on or before November 30, 2019 assuming the Company has raised at least $600,000 by that date and thereafter calls for a payment of $50,000 per month until paid in full. If the Company does not make a scheduled payment, the agreement in principal would be deemed null and void.

On April 5, 2018, the Company issued 185,388 common stock purchase options to Robert N. Weingarten, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer and 125,000 common stock purchase options to Pharmaland Executive Consulting Services LLC (“Pharmaland”) exercisable until April 5, 2023 at $1.12 per share of common stock, which was the closing price of the common stock as quoted on the OTC QB on that date. All of these common stock purchase options vested immediately. Each of the common stock purchase options were valued on the issuance date based upon a Black-Scholes valuation method at $1.081. Mr. Weingarten simultaneously with the issuance of the common stock purchase options, agreed to forgive $200,350 of accrued compensation owed to him. The value of the options granted to Mr. Weingarten was $200,404. The resulting loss on extinguishment of the accrued liability was $54. The common stock purchase options issued to Pharmaland was in partial payment of accounts payable owed. The common stock purchase options issued to Pharmaland had a value of $135,125 and the accounts payable extinguished was $124,025. The loss on extinguishment of this accounts payable was $11,100.

On November 21, 2018, the Company issued 283,643 shares of common stock with a value of $198,550 to designees of one of its intellectual property law firms as partial settlement of accounts payable due to the law firm. There was no gain or loss on the settlement of this accounts payable.

On November 21, 2018, the Company granted a non-qualified stock option (“NQSO”) to purchase 21,677 shares of common stock to a vendor to settle $15,000 of accounts payable due to that vendor. The NQSO vested immediately with respect to 14,452 shares of common stock and on November 30, 2018 with respect to an additional 7,225 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2018, the NQSO has vested with respect to all shares. The NQSO has a term of 5 years and have an exercise price of $0.70 per share, which was the closing price on the trading day of the grant date. The NQSO was valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model resulting value was $0.692 per NQSO. There was no gain or loss on the extinguishment of the accounts payable.

The Company continues to explore ways to reduce its obligations and indebtedness and might in the future enter into additional settlement and payment agreements.

6. Stockholders’ Deficiency

Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized a total of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, 1,250,000 shares were designated as 9% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (non-voting, “9% Preferred Stock”); 37,500 shares were designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (non-voting, “Series B Preferred Stock”); 205,000 shares were designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (non-voting, “Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock”); and 1,700 shares were designated as Series G 1.5% Convertible Preferred Stock. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2019, 3,505,800 shares of preferred stock were undesignated and may be issued with such rights and powers as the Board of Directors may designate.

There were no shares of 9% Preferred Stock or Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock or Series G 1.5% Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Series B Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of 37,500 shares issued in a May 1991 private placement. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into approximately 0.00030 shares of common stock at an effective conversion price of $2,208.375 per share of common stock, which is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding are convertible into 11 shares of common stock. The Company may redeem the Series B Preferred Stock for $25,001, equivalent to $0.6667 per share, an amount equal to its liquidation preference, at any time upon 30 days prior notice.

Common Stock

There are 4,175,072 shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019. After reserving for conversions of convertible debt as well as common stock purchase options and warrants exercises, there were 42,831,291 shares of the Company’s Common Stock available for future issuances as of December 31, 2019. After accounting for excess reserves required by the April 2019 Convertible Note, the May 2019 Convertible Note, the August 2019 Convertible Note, the October 2019 Convertible Note and the November 2019 Convertible Note, there were 3,438,021 available for future issuances as of December 31, 2019. Each conversion of such 2019 Convertible Notes reduces the excess reserve requirements.

2018 Unit Offering

On September 12, 2018, the Company consummated an initial closing on an offering (“2018 Unit Offering”) of Units comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock and one common stock purchase warrant. The 2018 Unit Offering was for up to $1.5 million and had a final termination date of October 15, 2018. The initial closing was for $250,750 of which $200,750 was the gross cash proceeds. The additional $50,000 was represented by the conversion into the 2018 Unit Offering of the principal amount of the Arnold S. Lippa, Demand Promissory Note described below. With the exchange of Dr. Lippa’s Demand Promissory Note into the 2018 Unit Offering, 47,620 warrants exercisable at 150% of the unit price ($1.575) per share of common stock and expiring on April 30, 2023 were issued with a value of $49,975 which amount was considered a loss on the extinguishment of that officer note and which amount was credited to additional paid-in capital. Units were sold for $1.05 per unit and the warrants issued in connection with the units are exercisable through April 30, 2023 at a fixed price of 150% of the unit purchase price. The warrants contain a cashless exercise provision and certain blocker provisions preventing exercise if the investor would beneficially own more than 4.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock as a result of such exercise. The warrants are also subject to redemption by the Company at $0.001 per share upon ten (10) days written notice if the Company’s common stock closes at $3.00 or more for any five (5) consecutive trading days. In total, 238,814 shares of the Company’s common stock and 238,814 common stock purchase warrants were purchased. Other than Arnold S. Lippa, the investors in the offering were not affiliates of the Company. Investors also received an unlimited number of piggy-back registration rights in respect to the shares of common stock and the shares of common stock underlying the common stock purchase warrants, unless such common stock is eligible to be sold with volume limits under an exemption from registration under any rule or regulation of the SEC that permits the holder to sell securities of the Company to the public without registration and without volume limits (assuming the holder is not an affiliate).

The shares of common stock and common stock purchase warrants were offered and sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as provided in Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. None of the shares of common stock issued as part of the units, the common stock purchase warrants, the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the common stock purchase warrants or any warrants issued to a qualified referral source (of which there were none in the initial closing) have been registered under the Securities Act or any other applicable securities laws, and unless so registered, may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

In addition, as set forth in the Purchase Agreements, each Purchaser had an unlimited number of exchange rights, which were options and not obligations, to exchange such Purchaser’s entire investment as defined (but not less than the entire investment) into one or more subsequent equity financings (consisting solely of convertible preferred stock or common stock or units containing preferred stock or common stock and warrants exercisable only into preferred stock or common stock) that would be considered as “permanent equity” under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and therefore classified within stockholders’ equity, and excluding any form of debt or convertible debt or preferred stock redeemable at the discretion of the holder (each such financing a “Subsequent Equity Financing”). The exchange rights expired on December 31, 2018.

F-25

Common Stock Warrants

In October 2019, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 175,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the issuance of the October 2019 Convertible Note exercisable at $0.50 per share and expiring on October 22, 2024.

In August 2019, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the issuance of the August 2019 Convertible Note exercisable at $0.50 per share and expiring on August 19, 2024.

In May 2019, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 42,372 shares of common stock in conjunction with the issuance of the May 2019 Convertible Note exercisable at $1.18 per share and expiring on May 17, 2022.

In January 2019, February 2019 and March 2019, the Company issued warrants to purchase 110,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the issuance of the 2019 Q1 Convertible Notes exercisable at $1.50 per share and expiring on December 30, 2023.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, warrants to purchase 69,558 shares of common stock expired.

In December 2018, the Company issued warrants to purchase 80,000 of common stock in conjunction with the issuance of the December 2018 10% Convertible Notes exercisable at $1.50 per share and expiring on December 30, 2023.

Although not considered stock-based compensation, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 47,620 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share and expiring on December 30, 2023 as part of an officer note exchange into the 2018 Unit Offering. The warrants were valued at $49,925 as of September 12, 2018, the date of issuance and were accounted for in Additional paid-in capital as of December 31, 2018.

A summary of warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2019 is presented below.

  

Number of

Shares

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (in Years)

 
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2018  1,783,229  $2.20393   3.06 
Issued  477,372   0.79079   4.36 
Expired  (69,558)  2.98989   - 
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2019  2,191,043  $1.87109   3.44 
             
Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2018  1,783,229  $2.20393   3.06 
Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2019  2,191,043  $1.87109   3.44 

The exercise prices of common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable are as follows at December 31, 2019:

Exercise Price  Warrants Outstanding
(Shares)
  Warrants Exercisable
(Shares)
  Expiration Date
$0.5000   175,000   175,000  October 22, 2024
$0.5000   150,000   150,000  August 19, 2024
$1.0000   916,217   916,217  September 20, 2022
$1.1800   42,372   42,372  May 17, 2022
$1.5000   190,000   190,000  December 30, 2023
$1.5620   130,284   130,284  December 31, 2021
$1.5750   238,814   238,814  April 30, 2023
$2.7500   8,000   8000  September 20, 2022
$4.8750   108,594   108,594  September 30, 2020
$6.8348   145,758   145,758  September 30, 2020
$7.9300   86,004   86,004  February 28, 2021
     2,191,043   2,191,043   

Based on a fair value of $0.10 per share on December 31, 2019, there were no exercisable in-the money common stock warrants as of December 31, 2019.

A summary of warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2018 is presented below.

  

Number of

Shares

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (in Years)

 
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2017  1,464,415  $2.68146   3.73 
Issued  318,814   1.55618   4.50 
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2018  1,783,229  $2.20393   3.06 
             
Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2017  1,464,415  $2,68146   3.73 
Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2018  1,783,229  $2.20393   3.06 

Stock Options

On March 18, 2014, the stockholders of the Company holding a majority of the votes to be cast on the issue approved the adoption of the Company’s 2014 Equity, Equity-Linked and Equity Derivative Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which had been previously adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company, subject to stockholder approval. The Plan permits the grant of options and restricted stock with respect to up to 325,025 shares of common stock, in addition to stock appreciation rights and phantom stock, to directors, officers, employees, consultants and other service providers of the Company.

On June 30, 2015, the Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The 2015 Plan initially provided for, among other things, the issuance of either or any combination of restricted shares of common stock and non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 461,538 shares of the Company’s common stock for periods up to ten years to management, members of the Board of Directors, consultants and advisors. The Company has not and does not intend to present the 2015 Plan to stockholders for approval. On December 28, 2018, the Board of Directors further increased the number of shares that may be issued under the 2015 Plan to 8,985,260 shares of the Company’s common stock.

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, there were three grants of options to purchase an aggregate of 348,827 shares of the Company’s common stock to a vendor. The value of these options on the grant date was approximately equal to the amount payable to the vendor that was to be paid with the options. The cumulative loss on extinguishment of three liabilities totaling $353,623 was $11,154. The remaining amount payable to the vendor is due in cash.

Information with respect to the Black-Scholes variables used in connection with the evaluation of the fair value of stock-based compensation costs and fees is provided at Note 3.

A summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2019 is presented below.

  

Number of

Shares

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (in Years)

 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2018  4,344,994  $3.5414   5.90 
Expired  (57,385)  15.6139   - 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2019  4,287,609  $3.3798   4.98 
             
Options exercisable at December 31, 2018  4,344,994  $3.5414   5.90 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2019  4,287,609  $3.3789   4.98 

The exercise prices of common stock options outstanding and exercisable were as follows at December 31, 2019:

Exercise Price  Options Outstanding (Shares)  Options Exercisable (Shares)  Expiration Date
$0.7000   21,677   21,677  November 21, 2023
$1.1200   310,388   310,388  April 5, 2023
$1.2500   16,762   16,762  December 7, 2022
$1.3500   34,000   34,000  July 28, 2022
$1.4500   1,849,418   1,849,418  December 9, 2027
$1.4500   100,000   100,000  December 9, 2027
$2.0000   285,000   285,000  June 30, 2022
$2.0000   25,000   25,000  July 26, 2022
$3.9000   395,000   395,000  January 17, 2022
$4.5000   7,222   7,222  September 2, 2021
$5.6875   89,686   89,686  June 30, 2020
$5.7500   2,608   2,608  September 12, 2021
$6.4025   27,692   27,692  August 18, 2020
$6.4025   129,231   129,231  August 18, 2022
$6.4025   261,789   261,789  August 18, 2025
$6.8250   8,791   8,791  December 11, 2020
$7.3775   523,077   523,077  March 31, 2021
$8.1250   169,231   169,231  June 30, 2022
$13.9750   3,385   3,385  March 14, 2024
$15.4700   7,755   7,755  April 8, 2020
$15.9250   2,462   2,462  February 28, 2024
$16.6400   1,538   1,538  January 29, 2020
$19.5000   9,487   9,487  July 17, 2022
$19.5000   6,410   6,410  August 10, 2022
     4,287,609   4,287,609   

There was no deferred compensation expense for the outstanding and unvested stock options at December 31, 2019.

Based on a fair value of $0.10 per share on December 31, 2019, there were no exercisable in-the-money common stock options as of December 31, 2019.

A summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2018 is presented below.

  

Number of

Shares

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (in Years)

 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2017  3,996,167  $3.7634   6.30 
Granted  348,827   1.1002   4.29 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2018  4,344,994  $3.5414   5.90 
             
Options exercisable at December 31, 2017  3,996,167  $3.7634   6.30 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2018  4,344,994  $3.5414   5.90 

The exercise prices of common stock options outstanding and exercisable were as follows at December 31, 2018:

Exercise Price  Options Outstanding (Shares)  Options Exercisable (Shares)  Expiration Date
$0.7000   21,677   21,677  November 21, 2023
$1.1200   310,388   310,388  April 5, 2023
$1.2500   16,762   16,762  December 7, 2022
$1.3500   34,000   34,000  July 28, 2022
$1.4500   1,849,418   1,849,418  December 9, 2027
$1.4500   100,000   100,000  December 9, 2027
$2.0000   285,000   285,000  June 30, 2022
$2.0000   25,000   25,000  July 26, 2022
$3.9000   395,000   395,000  January 17, 2022
$4.5000   7,222   7,222  September 2, 2021
$5.6875   89,686   89,686  June 30, 2020
$5.7500   2,608   2,608  September 12, 2021
$6.4025   27,692   27,692  August 18, 2020
$6.4025   129,231   129,231  August 18, 2022
$6.4025   261,789   261,789  August 18, 2025
$6.8250   8,791   8,791  December 11, 2020
$7.3775   523,077   523,077  March 31, 2021
$8.1250   169,231   169,231  June 30, 2022
$13.0000   7,385   7,385  March 13, 2019
$13.0000   3,846   3,846  April 14, 2019
$13.9750   3,385   3,385  March 14, 2024
$15.4700   7,755   7,755  April 8, 2020
$15.9250   2,462   2,462  February 28, 2024
$16.0500   46,154   46,154  July 17, 2019
$16.6400   1,538   1,538  January 29, 2020
$19.5000   9,487   9,487  July 17, 2022
$19.5000   6,410   6,410  August 10, 2022
     4,344,994   4,344,994   

There was no deferred compensation expense for the outstanding and unvested stock options at December 31, 2018.

Based on a fair value of $0.65 per share on December 31, 2018, there were no exercisable in-the-money common stock options as of December 31, 2018.

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, stock-based compensation costs and fees included in the consolidated statements of operations consisted of general and administrative expenses of $0 and $14,248 respectively, and research and development expenses of $0 and $15,000, respectively.

Pier Contingent Stock Consideration

In connection with the merger transaction with Pier effective August 10, 2012, RespireRx issued 179,747 newly issued shares of its common stock with an aggregate fair value of $3,271,402 ($18.2000 per share), based upon the closing price of RespireRx’s common stock on August 10, 2012. The shares of common stock were distributed to stockholders, convertible note holders, warrant holders, option holders, and certain employees and vendors of Pier in satisfaction of their interests and claims. The common stock issued by RespireRx represented approximately 41% of the 443,205 common shares outstanding immediately following the closing of the transaction.

The Company concluded that the issuance of any of the contingent shares to the Pier Stock Recipients was remote, as a result of the large spread between the exercise prices of these stock options and warrants as compared to the common stock trading range, the subsequent expiration or forfeiture of most of the options and warrants, the Company’s distressed financial condition and capital requirements, and that these stock options and warrants have remained significantly out-of-the-money through December 31, 2019. Accordingly, the Company considered the fair value of the contingent consideration to be immaterial and therefore did not ascribe any value to such contingent consideration. If any such shares are ultimately issued to the former Pier stockholders, the Company will recognize the fair value of such shares as a charge to operations at that time.

Reserved and Unreserved Shares of Common Stock

On January 17, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the adoption of an amendment of the Amended and Restated RespireRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan (as amended, the “2015 Plan”). That amendment increases the shares issuable under the plan by 1,500,000, from 1,538,461 to 3,038,461. On December 9, and December 28, 2018, the Board of Directors further amended the 2015 Plan to increase the number of shares that may be issued under the 2015 Plan to 6,985,260 and 8,985,260 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Other than the change in the number of shares available under the 2015 Plan, no other changes were made to the 2015 Plan by these amendments noted above.

At December 31, 2019, the Company had 65,000,000 shares of common stock authorized and 4,175,072 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The Company has reserved 11 shares of common stock for the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock. The Company has reserved an aggregate of 7,035,706 for the calculated amount of shares of common stock into which convertible notes may convert and an additional 39,375,462 shares of common stock for contractual reserves. In addition, The Company has reserved 6,478,652 shares of the Company’s common stock for exercises of common stock purchase options granted and warrants issued. There are 4,490,578 shares reserved for future issuances under the Company’s 2014 Plan and 2015 Plan. Accordingly, after taking into consideration the shares of common stock reserved for all conversions, exercises and contingent share issuances, there were 42,813,484 shares of the Company’s common stock available for future issuances as of December 31, 2019. After accounting for additional contractual reserves, which amount declines with each actual conversion, there are 3,438,022 shares of the Company’s common stock available for future issuances as of December 31, 2019. The Company has taken steps to increase the number of authorized shares. See Note 10. Subsequent Events. The Company expects to satisfy its future common stock commitments through the issuance of authorized but unissued shares of common stock.

7. Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are summarized below.

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Capitalized research and development costs $-  $183,000 
Research and development credits  3,017,000   3,017,000 
Stock-based compensation  3,787,000   3,787,000 
Stock options issued in connection with the payment of debt  202,000   202,000 
Net operating loss carryforwards  19,982,000   20,424,000 
Accrued compensation  586,000   367,000 
Accrued interest due to related party  217,000   103,000 
Other, net  8,000   8,000 
Total deferred tax assets  27,799,000   28,091,000 
Valuation allowance  (27,799,000)  (28,091,000)
Net deferred tax assets $-  $- 

In assessing the potential realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company attaining future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, management was unable to determine that it was more likely than not that the Company’s deferred tax assets will be realized, and has therefore recorded an appropriate valuation allowance against deferred tax assets at such dates.

No federal tax provision has been provided for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 due to the losses incurred during such periods. Reconciled below is the difference between the income tax rate computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
       
U. S. federal statutory tax rate  (21.0)%  (21.0)%
Forgiveness of indebtedness  -%  -%
Change in valuation allowance  (1.0)%  (14.4)%
Adjustment to deferred tax asset  22.0%  35.4%
Other  -%  -%
Effective tax rate  0.0%  0.0%

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had federal and state tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $102,216,000 and $46,645,000, respectively. The state tax net operating loss carryforward consists of $19,673,000 for California purposes and $26,972,000 for New Jersey purposes. The difference between the federal and state tax loss carryforwards was primarily attributable to the capitalization of research and development expenses for California franchise tax purposes. The federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2020 through 2039. State net operating losses expire at various dates from 2020 through 2029 for California and through 2039 for New Jersey. The Company also had federal and California research and development tax credit carryforwards that totaled approximately $1,871,000 and $1,146,000, respectively, at December 31, 2019. The federal research and development tax credit carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2020 through 2031. The California research and development tax credit carryforward does not expire and will carryforward indefinitely until utilized.

While the Company has not performed a formal analysis of the availability of its net operating loss carryforwards under Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383, management expects that the Company’s ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards will be limited in future periods.

The Company did not file its federal or state tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2017 or 2018 and has not yet filed such returns for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company does not expect there to be any material non-filing penalties. The Company intends to file such returns as soon as practical.

8. Related Party Transactions

Dr. Arnold S. Lippa and Jeff E. Margolis, officers and directors of the Company since March 22, 2013, have indirect ownership interests and managing memberships in Aurora Capital LLC (“Aurora”) through interests held in its members, and Jeff. E. Margolis is also an officer of Aurora. Aurora is a boutique investment banking firm specializing in the life sciences sector that is also a full-service brokerage firm.

A description of advances and notes payable to officers is provided at Note 4. Notes Payable – Advances from and Notes Payable to Officer.

Dr. James S. Manuso resigned as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer as well as Vice Chairman and member of the Board of Directors effective as of September 30, 2018. Having been the principal executive officer of the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, Dr. Manuso is considered a named executive officer for the year ended December 31, 2018, but not for the year ended December 31, 2019. Dr. Manuso remains an affiliate due to his equity ownership and option grants.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Pending or Threatened Legal Action and Claims

On March 10, 2020, Sharp Clinical Services, Inc. filed a complaint and summons dated February 21, 2020 in Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Bergen County against the Company related to a December 16, 2019 demand for payment of past due invoices inclusive of late fees totaling $103,890 of which $3,631 relates to late fees. The complaint and summons seeks $100,259 plus 1.5% interest per month on outstanding unpaid invoices. On Friday On Friday March 13, 2020, the RespireRx and its counsel communicated with counsel to this vendor and discussed why a settlement of such matter would be in the best interests of both parties, but has not yet received a response from this vendor or it’s counsel. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had recorded accounts payable of $99,959 to such vendor an amount considered by the Company to be reasonable given the ongoing settlement discussions.

By letter dated May 18, 2018, the Company received notice from counsel claiming to represent TEC Edmonton and The Governors of the University of Alberta, which purports to terminate, effective December 12, 2017, the license agreement dated May 9, 2007 between the Company and The Governors of the University of Alberta. The Company, through its counsel, disputed any grounds for termination and notified the representative that it invoked Section 13 of that license agreement, which mandates a meeting to be attended by individuals with decision-making authority to attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution to the dispute. In February 2019, the Company and TEC Edmonton tentatively agreed to terms acceptable to all parties to establish a new license agreement and the form of a new license agreement. However, the Company has re-evaluated that portion of its AMPAkine program and has decided not to enter into a new agreement at this time. The lack of entry into a new agreement at this time does not affect the Company’s other AMPAkine programs and permits the Company to reallocate resources to those programs, including, but not limited to ADHD, SCI, FXS and others.

By e-mail dated July 21, 2016, the Company received a demand from an investment banking consulting firm that represented the Company in 2012 in conjunction with the Pier transaction alleging that $225,000 is due and payable for investment banking services rendered. Such amount has been included in accrued expenses at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The Company is periodically the subject of various pending and threatened legal actions and claims. In the opinion of management of the Company, adequate provision has been made in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 with respect to such matters, including, specifically, the matters noted above. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself if any of the matters described above results in the filing of a lawsuit or formal claim. See Note 5. Settlement and Payment Agreements for additional items and details.

F-33

Significant Agreements and Contracts

Consulting Agreement

Richard Purcell, the Company’s Senior Vice President of Research and Development since October 15, 2014, provides his services to the Company on a month-to-month basis through his consulting firm, DNA Healthlink, Inc., through which the Company has contracted for his services, for a monthly cash fee of $12,500. Additional information with respect to shares of common stock that have been issued to Mr. Purcell is provided at Note 6. Cash compensation expense pursuant to this agreement totaled $150,000 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, which is included in research and development expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for such periods.

Employment Agreements

Employment Agreements

On October 12, 2018, after the resignation of Dr. James Manuso effective September 30, 2018, Dr. Lippa was named Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer (see Note 9 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018). Dr. Lippa has continued to serve as the Company’s Executive Chairman and as a member of the Board of Directors. On August 18, 2015, Dr. Lippa was named Chief Scientific Officer of the Company, and the Company entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Lippa in that capacity. Pursuant to the agreement, which was for an initial term through September 30, 2018 (and which automatically extended on September 30, 2018 and 2019 and will automatically extend annually, upon the same terms and conditions, for successive periods of one year, unless either party provides written notice of its intention not to extend the term of the agreement at least 90 days prior to the applicable renewal date), Dr. Lippa earned an annual base salary of $300,000. Dr. Lippa is also eligible to earn a performance-based annual bonus award of up to 50% of his base salary, based upon the achievement of annual performance goals established by the Board of Directors in consultation with the executive prior to the start of such fiscal year, or any amount at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Additionally, Dr. Lippa has been granted stock options on several occasions and is eligible to receive additional awards under the Company’s Plans at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Dr. Lippa did not receive any option to purchase shares of common stock during fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Dr. Lippa is also entitled to receive, until such time as the Company establishes a group health plan for its employees, $1,200 per month, on a tax-equalized basis, as additional compensation to cover the cost of health coverage and up to $1,000 per month, on a tax-equalized basis, as reimbursement for a term life insurance policy and disability insurance policy. Dr. Lippa is also entitled to be reimbursed for business expenses. Additional information with respect to the stock options granted to Dr. Lippa is provided at Note 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Cash compensation inclusive of employee benefits accrued pursuant to this agreement totaled $339,600 for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which amounts are included in accrued compensation and related expenses in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and in research and development expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Dr. Lippa does not receive any additional compensation for serving as Executive Chairman and on the Board of Directors.

On August 18, 2015, the Company also entered into an employment agreement with Jeff E. Margolis, in his role at that time as Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer. Pursuant to the agreement, which was for an initial term through September 30, 2016 and later amended (and which automatically extended on September 30, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 and will automatically extend annually, upon the same terms and conditions for successive periods of one year, unless either party provides written notice of its intention not to extend the term of the agreement at least 90 days prior to the applicable renewal date), Mr. Margolis currently receives an annual base salary of $300,000, and is eligible to receive performance-based annual bonus awards based upon the achievement of annual performance goals established by the Board of Directors in consultation with the executive prior to the start of such fiscal year. Additionally, Mr. Margolis has granted stock options on several occasions and is eligible to receive additional awards under the Company’s Plans at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Mr. Margolis is also entitled to receive, until such time as the Company establishes a group health plan for its employees, $1,200 per month, on a tax-equalized basis, as additional compensation to cover the cost of health coverage and up to $1,000 per month, on a tax-equalized basis, as reimbursement for a term life insurance policy and disability insurance policy. Mr. Margolis is also entitled to be reimbursed for business expenses. Additional information with respect to the stock options granted to Mr. Margolis is provided at Note 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Recurring cash compensation accrued pursuant to this amended agreement totaled $321,600 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 which amounts are included in accrued compensation and related expenses in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet December 31, 2019 and 2018, and in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.

The employment agreements between the Company and Dr. Lippa, and Mr. Margolis (prior to the 2017 amendment), respectively, provided that the payment obligations associated with the first year base salary were to accrue, but no payments were to be made, until at least $2,000,000 of net proceeds from any offering or financing of debt or equity, or a combination thereof, was received by the Company, at which time scheduled payments were to commence. Dr. Lippa, and Mr. Margolis (who are each also directors of the Company) have each agreed, effective as of August 11, 2016, to continue to defer the payment of such amounts indefinitely, until such time as the Board of Directors of the Company determines that sufficient capital has been raised by the Company or is otherwise available to fund the Company’s operations on an ongoing basis.

University of Illinois 2014 Exclusive License Agreement

On June 27, 2014, the Company entered into an Exclusive License Agreement (the “2014 License Agreement”) with the University of Illinois, the material terms of which were similar to a License Agreement between the parties that had been previously terminated on March 21, 2013. The 2014 License Agreement became effective on September 18, 2014, upon the completion of certain conditions set forth in the 2014 License Agreement, including: (i) the payment by the Company of a $25,000 licensing fee, (ii) the payment by the Company of outstanding patent costs aggregating $15,840, and (iii) the assignment to the University of Illinois of rights the Company held in certain patent applications, all of which conditions were fulfilled.

The 2014 License Agreement granted the Company (i) exclusive rights to several issued and pending patents in numerous jurisdictions and (ii) the non-exclusive right to certain technical information that is generated by the University of Illinois in connection with certain clinical trials as specified in the 2014 License Agreement, all of which relate to the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of sleep related breathing disorders. The Company is developing dronabinol (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol), a cannabinoid, for the treatment of OSA, the most common form of sleep apnea.

The 2014 License Agreement provides for various commercialization and reporting requirements commencing on June 30, 2015. In addition, the 2014 License Agreement provides for various royalty payments, including a royalty on net sales of 4%, payment on sub-licensee revenues of 12.5%, and a minimum annual royalty beginning in 2015 of $100,000, which is due and payable on December 31 of each year beginning on December 31, 2015. The minimum annual royalty obligation of $100,000 due on December 31, 2019, was extended to June 30, 2020. One-time milestone payments may become due based upon the achievement of certain development milestones. $350,000 will be due within five days after the dosing of the first patient is a Phase III human clinical trial anywhere in the world. $500,000 will be due within five days after the first NDA filing with FDA or a foreign equivalent. $1,000,000 will be due within twelve months of the first commercial sale. One-time royalty payments may also become due and payable. Annual royalty payments may also become due. In the year after the first application for market approval is submitted to the FDA or a foreign equivalent and until approval is obtained, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $150,000. In the year after the first market approval is obtained from the FDA or a foreign equivalent and until the first sale of a product, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $200,000. In the year after the first commercial sale of a product, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $250,000.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded charges to operations of $100,000, respectively, with respect to its 2019 and 2018 minimum annual royalty obligation, which is included in research and development expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Company did not pay the amount due on December 31, 2019 for which the Company was granted an extension until June 30, 2020.

University of Alberta License Agreement

On May 18, 2018, the Company received a letter from counsel claiming to represent TEC Edmonton and The Governors of the University of Alberta, which purported to terminate, effective December 12, 2017, the license agreement dated May 9, 2007 (as subsequently amended) between the Company and The Governors of the University of Alberta. The Company, through its counsel, disputed any grounds for termination and notified the representative that it invoked Section 13 of that license agreement, which mandates a meeting to be attended by individuals with decision-making authority to attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution to the dispute. In February 2019, the Company and TEC Edmonton tentatively agreed to terms acceptable to all parties to establish a new license agreement and the form of a new license agreement. However, after reaching that tentative agreement, the Company has re-evaluated that portion of its AMPAkine program and has decided not to enter into a new agreement at this time. The lack of entry into a new agreement at this time does not affect the Company’s other AMPAkine programs and permits the Company to reallocate resources to those programs, including, but not limited to ADHD, FXS, SCI and CNS-driven Disorders.

Noramco Inc. - Dronabinol Development and Supply Agreement

On September 4, 2018, RespireRx entered into a dronabinol Development and Supply Agreement with Noramco Inc., one of the world’s major dronabinol manufacturers. Under the terms of the Agreement, Noramco agreed to (i) provide all of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) estimated to be needed for the clinical development process for both the first- and second-generation products (each a “Product” and collectively, the “Products”), three validation batches for New Drug Application (“NDA”) filing(s) and adequate supply for the initial inventory stocking for the wholesale and retail channels, subject to certain limitations, (ii) maintain or file valid drug master files (“DMFs”) with the FDA or any other regulatory authority and provide the Company with access or a right of reference letter entitling the Company to make continuing reference to the DMFs during the term of the agreement in connection with any regulatory filings made with the FDA by the Company, (iii) participate on a development committee, and (iv) make available its regulatory consultants, collaborate with any regulatory consulting firms engaged by the Company and participate in all FDA or Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) meetings as appropriate and as related to the API.

In consideration for these supplies and services, the Company has agreed to purchase exclusively from Noramco during the commercialization phase all API for its Products as defined in the Development and Supply Agreement at a pre-determined price subject to certain producer price adjustments and agreed to Noramco’s participation in the economic success of the commercialized Product or Products up to the earlier of the achievement of a maximum dollar amount or the expiration of a period of time.

Transactions with Biovail Laboratories International SRL

Beginning in March 2010, the Company entered into a series of asset purchase and license agreements with Biovail Laboratories International SRL later merged with Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. which was later renamed Bausch Health Companies Inc. (“Biovail”).

In March 2011, the Company entered into a new agreement with Biovail to reacquire the AMPAkine compounds, patents and rights that Biovail had acquired from the Company in March 2010. The new agreement provided for potential future payments of up to $15,150,000 by the Company based upon the achievement of certain developments, including new drug application submissions and approval milestones pertaining to an intravenous dosage form of the AMPAkine compounds for respiratory depression, a therapeutic area not currently pursued by the Company. Biovail is also eligible to receive additional payments of up to $15,000,000 from the Company based upon the Company’s net sales of an intravenous dosage form of the compounds for respiratory depression.

At any time following the completion of Phase 1 clinical studies and prior to the end of Phase 2A clinical studies, Biovail retains an option to co-develop and co-market intravenous dosage forms of an AMPAkine compound as a treatment for respiratory depression and vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. In such an event, the Company would be reimbursed for certain development expenses to date and Biovail would share in all such future development costs with the Company. If Biovail makes the co-marketing election, the Company would owe no further milestone payments to Biovail and the Company would be eligible to receive a royalty on net sales of the compound by Biovail or its affiliates and licensees.

Summary of Principal Cash Obligations and Commitments

The following table sets forth the Company’s principal cash obligations and commitments for the next five fiscal years as of December 31, 2019, aggregating $995,900. Employment agreement amounts included in the 2020 column represent amounts contractually due at from January 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020 when such contracts expire unless extended pursuant to the terms of the contracts.

     Payments Due By Year 
  Total  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
License agreements $500,000  $100,000  $100,000  $100,000  $100,000  $100,000 
Employment agreements (1)  495,900   495,900   -   -   -   - 
Total $995,900  $595,900  $100,000  $100,000  $100,000  $100,000 

(1) The payment of such amounts has been deferred indefinitely, as described above at “Employment Agreements”.

10. Subsequent Events

On March 10, 2020, RespireRx was served a complaint and summons dated February 21, 2020 related to a December 16, 2019 demand for payment of past due invoices inclusive of late fees totaling $103,890 of which $3,631 relates to late fees which seeks $100,259 plus 1.5% interest per month on outstanding unpaid invoices. On Friday March 13, 2020, RespireRx and its counsel communicated with vendor’s counsel and discussed why a settlement of such matter would be in the best interests of both parties. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had recorded accounts payable of $99,959 to such vendor an amount considered by the Company to be reasonable given the ongoing settlement discussions.

The due date of the $100,000 annual amount payable to the University of Illinois that was originally due on December 31, 2019 pursuant to the 2014 License Agreement, was extended to June 30, 2020.

On March 2, 2020, RespireRx and UWM Research Foundation, an affiliate of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, entered into an option agreement (“UWMRF Option Agreement”) pursuant to which RespireRx has a six-month option to license the identified intellectual property pursuant to license terms substantially in the Form of a Patent License Agreement (“UWMRF License Agreement”) that is attached to the UWMRF Option Agreement as Appendix I. The UWMRF License Agreement, if it becomes effective, will expand the Company’s neuromodulator program which has historically included the Company’s AMPAkine program to include a GABA-A program as well.

On March 20, 2020, the holder of the August 2019 Convertible Note converted $1,000 of principal and $866 of reimbursable costs into 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On March 16, 2020 the same holder converted $1,000 principal amount and $866 of reimbursable conversion costs into 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On February 24, 2020 the same holder converted $6,150 principal amount and $1,200 of reimbursable costs into 175,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. There remains $46,850 of principal amount plus accrued interest due on the August 2019 Convertible Note (See Note 4. Notes Payable – Convertible Notes Payable).

On March 20, 2020, the holder of the May 2019 Convertible Note converted $493 of principal and $750 of reimbursable costs into 259,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. There remains $44,953 of principal amount plus accrued interest due on the May 2019 Convertible Note. (See Note 4. Notes Payable – Convertible Notes Payable).

On March 26, 2020 the holder of the April 2019 Convertible Note converted $5,600 principal amount and $3,510 of interest into 1,247,945 shares of the Company’s common stock which resulted in the full repayment of all amounts owed pursuant to the April 2019 Convertible Note. On March 24, 2020 and March 20, 2019, the holder of the April 2019 Convertible Note converted $1,800 principal amount on each date into 246,575 shares of the Company’s common stock on each date. Similarly, on March 19, 2020 the holder of the April 2019 Convertible Note converted $1,800 principal amount into 246,575 shares of the Company’s common stock. On January 6, 2020, February 18, 2020 and March 4, 2020 the holder of the April 2019 Convertible Note converted $9,800, $9,400 and $8,300 respectively, of principal amount into 200,820, 217,090 and 226,776 shares of the Company’s common stock respectively. There remains no principal amount or accrued interest due on the April 2019 Convertible Note. (See Note 4. Notes Payable – Convertible Notes Payable).

On March 21, 2020, the Company entered into five separately negotiated Exchange Agreements (each an “Exchange Agreement” and collectively, the “Exchange Agreements”) with certain existing holders (the “Noteholders”) of Convertible Promissory Notes of the Company (the “Notes”). On March 22, 2020 (the “Closing Date”), each Noteholder exchanged his, her or its Note or Notes for shares of common stock of the Company as contemplated by the respective Exchange Agreement. The Noteholders were issued the Notes by the Company on one or more of the following dates: December 31, 2014, December 6, 2018, December 7, 2018, February 27, 2019, March 6, 2019 and March 14, 2019. Under the Exchange Agreements, an aggregate of $255,786.37 principal amount and accrued interest with respect to the Notes were exchanged and cancelled in return for an aggregate of 17,052,424 shares of Common Stock.

On March 21, 2020, two directors and officers of the Company, agreed to forgive a portion of the accrued but unpaid compensation to which each was entitled pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company, equal to $153,000 each. On March 22, 2020, the Company issued to each of them 4,500,000 shares of Common Stock in exchange for this forgiveness, which equates to a per share value of $0.034 per share, the closing share price of Common Stock on Friday, March 20, 2020, the last business day prior to the transaction.

Under the terms of the April 2019 Convertible Note, the May 2019 Convertible Note, the August 2019 Convertible Note, the October 2019 Convertible Note and the November 2019 Convertible Note (each a “Subsequent Note” and collectively, the “Subsequent Notes”), the Company is subject to covenants to maintain a number of reserved shares of common stock with respect to these Subsequent Notes. The reserve requirement is generally a multiple of the number of shares of common stock that would be issued uponif there were a conversion pursuant to the terms of the principalapplicable Subsequent Note. A breach by the Company of these covenants is an event of default under the promissory note.terms of the April, August and October Subsequent Notes that generally increases the applicable note’s principal amount and interest rate, and accelerates its maturity date, making the debt immediately due and payable. For the May Subsequent Note, the provisions are similar, but a notice of default is required before such increases and acceleration. For the November Subsequent Note, an event of default will only occur if the holder requests replenishment of the reserves, and that request is not met within three days or a subsequent five-day cure period. The warrant to purchase additionalholder of the November Subsequent Note has not yet made such request. (See Note 4. Notes Payable – Convertible Notes Payable).

On March 21 and 22, 2020, the board of directors of Company approved, and on March 22, 2020 the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares shall include an exercise price per share representingof the Company’s common stock executed written consents approving a 40% premiumCertificate of Amendment to the price per shareCompany’s Certificate of Incorporation. When filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware, the Certificate of Amendment will increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock of the Company from 65,000,000 to 1,000,000,000. The Company as required, filed a Form DEF 14C Information Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The filing was made on April 10, 2020. The Company is required to provide (generally by mail), the DEF 14C to its shareholders who did not consent to the action. Twenty days after the commencement of the distribution of the Form DEF 14C, the Company is eligible to file the Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of Delaware. The Company has taken this action primarily to increase the number of authorized shares available and to bring it back into compliance with the covenants in the Subsequent Notes regarding the required number of reserved shares of common stock. As described above, the outstanding principal of certain of the Subsequent Notes has been reduced as the holders of these notes have converted a portion of the outstanding principal in exchange for Common Shares, pursuant to the term of the applicable Subsequent Note. With respect to those Subsequent Notes for which conversions have occurred, interest continues to accrue based upon the reduced principal amount of the relevant Subsequent Note. The Company has received waivers of the reserve requirements from several of the Subsequent Note holders until April 30, 2020. The Company is in discussions with the relevant remaining holders of the Subsequent Notes with respect to this recent action, seeking waivers regarding the technical breach of the reserve provisions until such time as the increase in authorized shares is effective, which the Company currently expects will be on or about April 30, 2020, at which time the common stock is issued upon conversionCompany expects that the number of the promissory note.

Costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2009reserved shares will again be in connectioncompliance with the private placementapplicable covenants.

Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis have been recorded as deferred offering costs in the accompanying Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009.

On March 25, 2010, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Biovail. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, Biovail acquired the Company’s interests in CX717, CX1763, CX1942 and the injectable dosage form of CX1739, as well as certain of its other AMPAKINE compounds and related intellectual property for use in the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. In connection with the transaction, Biovail paid the Company the lump sum of $9,000,000 upon the execution of the asset purchase agreement and will pay it an additional $1,000,000 upon the later of the completion of the specified transfer plan or September 25, 2010. In addition, the Company will have the right to receive up to three milestone payments in an aggregate amount of up to $15,000,000 plus the reimbursement of certain related expenses, each conditioned upon the occurrence of particular events relating to the clinical development of certain assets that Biovail acquired. As part of the transaction, Biovail licensed backmade advances to the Company certain exclusive and irrevocable rightson April 13, 2020 totaling $18,500 in the aggregate, which funds were utilized to some acquired AMPAKINE compounds, other than CX717, an injectable dosage formmake a payment of CX1739, CX1763 and CX1942, for use outside of$18,000 to the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. Accordingly, following the transaction with Biovail, the Company retains its rightsCompany’s auditors.

F-38

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  June 30, 2020  December 31, 2019 
  (unaudited)    
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $1,492  $16,690 
Prepaid expenses  84,191   28,638 
         
Total current assets  85,683   45,328 
         
Total assets $85,683  $45,328 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including $574,226 and $476,671 payable to related parties at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively $4,307,228  $3,772,030 
Accrued compensation and related expenses  2,270,084   2,083,841 
Convertible notes payable, currently due and payable on demand, including accrued interest of $69,297 and $113,304 at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively of which $46,230 and $43,666, was deemed to be in default at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (Note 4)  201,754   551,591 
Note payable to SY Corporation, including accrued interest of $387,201 and $363,280 at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively (payment obligation currently in default – Note 4)  760,215   766,236 
Notes payable to officer, including accrued interest of $41,021 and $35,388 as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively (Note 4)  147,871   142,238 
Notes payable to former officer, including accrued interest of $50,417 and $41,977 as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively (Note 4)  178,017   169,577 
         
Other short-term notes payable  67,262   4,634 
         
Total current liabilities  7,932,431   7,490,147 
         
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)        
         
Stockholders’ deficiency: (Note 6)        
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; $0.6667 per share liquidation preference; aggregate liquidation preference $25,001; shares authorized: 37,500; shares issued and outstanding: 11; common shares issuable upon conversion at 0.00030 common shares per Series B share  21,703   21,703 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; shares authorized: 1,000,000,000; shares issued and outstanding: 222,307,381 at June 30, 2020 and 4,175,072 at December 31, 2019, respectively (Note 2 and Note 9)  222,307   4,175 
Additional paid-in capital  160,181,182   159,038,388 
Accumulated deficit  (168,271,940)  (166,509,085)
         
Total stockholders’ deficiency  (7,846,748)  (7,444,819)
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency $85,683  $45,328 

See accompanying notes to develop and commercialize the non-acquired AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for neurological diseases and psychiatric disorders. Additionally, the Company retains its rightscondensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2020   2019  2020  2019 
Operating expenses:                
General and administrative, including $147,255 and $122,025 to related parties for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and $249,614 and $243,225 to related parties for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively $463,739   $270,391  $829,019  $594,904 
Research and development, including $121,900 and $122,400 to related parties for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and $244,800 to related parties for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively  153,176    148,000   308,466   297,350 
Total operating expenses  616,915    418,391   1,137,485   892,254 
Loss from operations  (616,915)   (418,391)  (1,137,485)  (892,254)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other liabilities in exchange for equity  (-)   -   (323,996)  - 
Interest expense, including $2,817 and $2,561 to related parties for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and $5,633 and $5,094 to related parties for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively  (190,606)   (70,533)  (331,316)  (151,645)
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)  (8,616)   11,711   29,942   26,354 
                  
Net loss attributable to Common Stockholders $(816,137)  $(477,213) $(1,762,855) $(1,017,545)
                  
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.01)  $(0.12) $(0.04) $(0.26)
                  
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  86,606,705    3,872,076   49,320,761   3,872,076 

See accompanying notes to develop commercialize the AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders, including an oral dosage form of AMPAKINE CX1739.condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

   (Unaudited)
September 30,  2010
  (Note)
December 31,  2009
 

Assets

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $2,259,201   $226,466  

Marketable securities

   2,248,492    —    

Other current assets

   54,933    19,578  
         

Total current assets

   4,562,626    246,044  

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net

   276,462    383,347  

Capitalized offering costs

   —      29,917  

Other

   41,373    46,667  
         
  $4,880,461   $705,975  
         

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $809,991   $1,575,240  

Accrued wages, salaries and related expenses

   386,930    331,414  

Advance for MCI project

   318,756    315,742  
         

Total current liabilities

   1,515,677    2,222,396  

Deferred rent

   19,351    11,288  
         

Total liabilities

   1,535,028    2,233,684  
         

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

   

Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; $0.6667 per share liquidation preference; shares authorized: 37,500; shares issued and outstanding: 37,500; shares issuable upon conversion: 3,679

   21,703    21,703  

Common stock, $0.001 par value; shares authorized: 205,000,000; shares issued and outstanding: 78,858,197 (September 30, 2010) and 68,412,618 (December 31, 2009)

   78,858    68,413  

Additional paid-in capital

   120,774,020    118,525,140  

Unrealized gain, available for sale marketable securities

   623    —    

Accumulated deficit

   (117,529,771  (120,142,965
         

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

   3,345,433    (1,527,709
         
  $4,880,461   $705,975  
         

See accompanying notes.

Note: The balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

CONDENSED STATEMENTSCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

   Three months ended  Nine months ended 
   September 30,  September 30, 
   2010  2009  2010  2009 

Revenues:

     

Sale of AMPAKINE® assets

  $1,000,000   $—     $10,000,000   $—    

Grant revenues

   192,607    —      192,607    —    
                 

Total revenues

   1,192,607    —      10,192,607    —    
                 

Operating expenses (A):

     

Research and development

   776,701    846,088    3,346,988    4,009,359  

General and administrative

   946,720    882,554    3,677,408    2,851,140  
                 

Total operating expenses

   1,723,421    1,728,642    7,024,396    6,860,499  
                 

Income (loss) from operations

   (530,814  (1,728,642  3,168,211    (6,860,499

Interest income (expense), net

   2,609    983    (555,017  18,158  
                 

Net income (loss)

  $(528,205 $(1,727,659 $2,613,194   $(6,842,341
                 

Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock

   —      —      —      (831,704

Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

   —      (1,515,117  —      (1,515,117
                 

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

  $(528,205 $(3,242,776 $2,613,194   $(9,189,162
                 

Net income (loss) per share (Note 1):

     

Basic and diluted

  $(0.01 $(0.06 $0.04   $(0.18
                 

Shares used in calculating per share amounts (Note 1):

     

Basic

   78,858,197    57,255,030    72,851,033    51,526,797  
                 

Diluted

   78,858,197    57,255,030    78,291,865    51,526,797  
                 

(A) Operating expenses include the following non-cash stock compensation charges:

     

Research and development

  $(5,271 $83,559   $58,191   $221,987  

General and administrative

   61,567    115,796    207,988    233,558  
                 
  $56,296   $199,355   $266,179   $455,545  
                 

See accompanying notes.

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

CONDENSED STATEMENTSOF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

   Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   2010  2009 

Cash flows from operating activities:

   

Net income (loss)

  $2,613,194   $(6,842,341

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

   

Depreciation expense

   85,844    146,342  

Stock option compensation expense

   266,179    455,545  

Amortization of beneficial conversion feature

   223,880    —    

Amortization of capitalized offering costs

   57,698    —    

Warrant issued upon conversion of promissory note

   233,767    —    

Changes in operating assets/liabilities:

   

Accrued interest on marketable securities

   14,517    68  

Other current assets

   (35,355  99,838  

Other non-current assets

   5,294    —    

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   (709,733  127,990  

Accrued interest on convertible promissory note

   35,500    —    

Deferred rent

   8,063    6,450  

Other

   11,508    2,842  
         

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   2,810,356    (6,003,266
         

Cash flows from investing activities:

   

Purchases of marketable securities

   (2,622,386  —    

Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities

   360,000    2,713,659  

Purchases of fixed assets

   (50,889  (1,491

Proceeds from sales of fixed assets

   63,435    1,785  
         

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

   (2,249,840  2,713,953  
         

Cash flows from financing activities:

   

Proceeds from issuance of convertible promissory note

   1,500,000    —    

Costs related to issuance of convertible promissory note

   (27,781  —    

Proceeds from issued of preferred stock in July 2009 private placement, gross

   —      2,000,000  

Costs related to issuance of preferred stock in July 2009 private placement

   —      (304,823

Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock in April 2009 registered direct offering, gross

   —      1,475,000  

Costs related to issuance of preferred stock in April 2009 registered direct offering

   —      (230,312
         

Net cash provided by financing activities

   1,472,219    2,939,865  
         

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   2,032,735    (349,448

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

   226,466    1,430,886  
         

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  $2,259,201   $1,081,438  
         

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:

   

Issuance of common stock upon conversion of promissory note

  $1,535,500   $—    

Accretion of fair value of beneficial conversion feature on 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock

   —      831,704  

Accretion of fair value of beneficial conversion feature on Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

   —      1,515,117  

See accompanying notes.

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

NOTESTO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

(Unaudited)

Note 1 —Six-months Ended June, 2020

  Series B                
  Convertible        Additional     Total 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Deficit  Deficiency 
                      
Balance, December 31, 2019  37,500  $21,703   4,175,072  $4,175  $159,038,388  $(166,509,085) $(7,444,819)
Issuances of Common Stock  -   -   29,518,781   29,519   910,599   -   940,118 
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2020                      (946,718)  (946,718)
Balance at March 31, 2020  37,500  $21,703   33,693,853  $33,694  $159,948,987  $(167,455,803  $(7,451,419)
Issuances of Common Stock  -   -   188,613,528   188,613   142,195   -   330,808 
Note discounts                  90,000       90,000 
Net loss                      (816,137)  (816,137)
Balance, June 30, 2020  37,500  $21,703   222,307,381  $222,307  $160,181,182  $(168,271,940) $(7,846,748)

Three-months Ended June, 2020

  Series B                
  Convertible        Additional     Total 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Deficit  Deficiency 
                      
Balance, March 31, 2020  37,500  $21,703   33,693,853,  $33,694  $159,948,987  $(167,455,803) $(7,451,419)
Issuances of Common Stock  -   -   188,613,528   188,613   232,195   -   420,808 
Net loss                      (816,137)  (816,137)
Balance, June 30, 2020  37,500  $21,703   222,307,381  $222,307  $160,181,182  $(168,271,940) $(7,846,748)

Six-months Ended June 30, 2019

  Series B             
  Convertible     Additional     Total 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Deficit  Deficiency 
Balance, December 31, 2018  37,500  $21,703   3,872,076  $3,872  $158,635,222  $(164,394,052) $(5,733,255)
Fair value of Common Stock warrants issued in connection with convertible notes  -   -   -   -   45,812   -   45,812 
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2019                     $(540,332) $(540,332)
Balance at March 31, 2019  37,500  $21,703   3,872,076  $3,872  $158,681,034  $(164,934,384) $(6,227,775)
Fair value of Common Stock warrants and beneficial conversion feature associated with convertible notes                 $87,950      $87,950 
Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2019                      (477,213)  (477,213)
Balance, June 30, 2019  37,500  $21,703   3,872,076  $3,872  $158,768,984  $(165,411,597) $(6,617,038)

Three-months Ended June 30, 2019

  Series B                
  Convertible        Additional     Total 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Deficit  Deficiency 
                      
Balance, March 31, 2019  37,500  $21,703   3,872,076,  $3,872  $158,681,034  $(164,934,384) $(6,227,775)
Fair value of Common Stock warrants and beneficial conversion feature associated with convertible notes  -   -           87,950   -   87,950 
Net loss                      (477,213)  (477,213)
Balance, June 30, 2019  37,500  $21,703   3,872,076  $3,872  $158,768,984  $(165,411,597) $(6,617,038)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2020  2019 
         
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(1,762,855) $(1,017,545)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Amortization of debt discounts  237,615   89,000 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  323,996   - 
Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss  (29,942)  (26,354)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Prepaid expenses  (55,552)  (59,250)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  535,198   261,889 
Accrued compensation and related expenses  492,243   390,600 
Accrued interest payable  152,849   95,382 
Net cash used in operating activities  (106,448)  (266,278)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from convertible notes borrowings  90,000   213,500 
Debt issuance costs  -   (5,500)
Proceeds from issuance of note payable to officer  1,250   25,000 
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  91,250   233,000 
         
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Net decrease  (15,198)  (33,278)
Balance at beginning of period  16,690   33,284 
Balance at end of period $1,492  $6 

(Continued)

  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2020  2019 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for -        
Interest $1,498  $932 
         
Non-cash financing activities:        
Beneficial Conversion Feature and Warrants issued with convertible debt $90,000   50,258 
Debt and accrued interest converted to Common Stock $950,421  $- 
Issuance of Common Stock for accrued compensation and benefits $306,000  $- 
Cashless warrant exercises $15,638  $- 
Original issue discounts associated with convertible debt $-  $10,500 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization

RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“RespireRx”) was formed in 1987 under the name Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to engage in the discovery, development and Significant Accounting Principlescommercialization of innovative pharmaceuticals for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. On December 16, 2015, RespireRx filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended, the “Certificate of Incorporation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to amend its Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation to change its name from Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. In August 2012, RespireRx acquired Pier Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Pier”), which is now a wholly owned subsidiary. Pier was a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company developing a pharmacologic treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (“OSA”) and had been engaged in research and clinical development activities which activities are now in RespireRx.

While developing potential applications for respiratory disorders, notably dronabinol (a cannabinoid that is a synthetic form of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (“Δ9-THC”)), for the treatment of OSA, the Company has retained and expanded its AMPAkine intellectual property and data with respect to neurological and psychiatric disorders and is considering developing certain potential products in this platform, subject to raising additional financing and/or entering into strategic relationships, of which no assurance can be provided. On August 1, 2020, RespireRx and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Research Foundation, Inc. (“UWMRF”), an affiliate of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, entered into a Patent License Agreement (the “UWMRF Patent License Agreement”), pursuant to which UWMRF licensed to RespireRx certain patent and technology rights held by UWMRF for RespireRx’s use in developing commercial products (See Note 9. Subsequent Events). The licensed intellectual property is associated with a program involving GABAkines, positive allosteric modulators (“PAMs”) of the Type A gamma-amino-butyric acid (“GABAA”) receptors. Together, the AMPAkine and GABAkine programs are the foundation of the Company’s neuromodulator platform called EndeavourRx.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted inare of RespireRx and its wholly owned subsidiary, Pier (collectively referred to herein as the United States for interim“Company,” “we” or “our,” unless the context indicates otherwise). The condensed consolidated financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include allstatements of the informationCompany at June 30, 2020 and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted infor the United States for complete financial statements.three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of(including normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentationadjustments) have been included. Operatingmade that are necessary to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2020, the results of its condensed consolidated operations for the three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, changes in its condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ deficiency for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 and its condensed consolidated cash flows for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Condensed consolidated operating results for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that mayto be expected for thea full fiscal year. For further information, refer toThe consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements at such date.

The condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes theretohave been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and other information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.2019, as filed with the SEC.

In January 1999,2. Business

The mission of the Company entered into a research collaboration and exclusive worldwide license agreement with NV Organon (“Organon”) to enable Organonis to develop innovative and commercializerevolutionary treatments to combat disorders caused by disruption of neuronal signalling. We are developing treatment options that address conditions that affect millions of people, but for which there are few or poor treatment options, including obstructive sleep apnea (“OSA”), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”) and recovery from spinal cord injury (“SCI”), as well as certain neurological orphan diseases such as Fragile X Syndrome (“FXS”). With the Company’s addition of the GABAkine program we have added development programs for treatment resistant epilepsy and other convulsant disorders, and potentially migraine, inflammatory and neuropathic pain, as well as other areas of interest based on results of animal studies to date. We are developing a pipeline of new drug products based on our broad patent portfolios for two drug platforms: (i) our cannabinoids platform (which we refer to as ResolutionRx), including dronabinol (a synthetic form of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (“Δ9-THC”)), which acts upon the nervous system’s endogenous cannabinoid receptors and (ii) our neuromodulators platform (which we refer to as EndeavourRx), which platform includes two programs: (a) our AMPAkines program, proprietary compounds that positively modulate AMPA-type glutamate receptors to promote neuronal function and (b) our GABAkines program, PAMs of GABAAMPAKINE receptors that are the subject of the UWMRF Patent License Agreement.

With the ResolutionRx cannabinoid platform, we plan to create a wholly owned private subsidiary of RespireRx with its own board of directors.

With the EndeavourRx neuromodulator platform, we are considering creating another wholly owned private subsidiary of RespireRx with its own board of directors.

®Cannabinoids technology

With respect to the cannabinoid platform, two Phase 2 clinical trials have been completed demonstrating the ability of dronabinol to significantly reduce the symptoms of OSA, which management believes is potentially a multi-billion-dollar market. Subject to raising sufficient financing (of which no assurance can be provided), we believe that we have put most of the necessary pieces into place to rapidly initiate a Phase 3 clinical trial program. By way of definition, when a new drug is allowed by FDA to be tested in humans, Phase 1 clinical trials are conducted in healthy people to determine safety and pharmacokinetics. If successful, Phase 2 clinical trials are conducted in patients to determine safety and preliminary efficacy. Phase 3 trials, large scale studies to determine efficacy and safety, are the final step prior to seeking FDA approval to market a drug.

Neuromodulators – EndeavourRx - AMPAkines and GABAkines

Neurotransmitters are chemicals released by neurons that enable neurons to communicate with one another. This process is called neurotransmission. Neurons release neurotransmitters that attach to a very specific protein structure, termed a receptor, residing on an adjacent neuron. This neurotransmission process can either increase or decrease the excitability of the neuron receiving the message.

Neuromodulators do not act directly at the neurotransmitter binding site, but instead act at accessory sites that enhance (Positive Allosteric Modulators – “PAMs”) or reduce (Negative Allosteric Modulators – “NAMs”) the actions of neurotransmitters at their primary receptor sites. Neuromodulators have no intrinsic activity of their own. We believe that neuromodulators offer the possibility of developing “kinder and gentler” neuropharmacological drugs with greater pharmacological specificity and reduced side effects compared to present drugs, especially in disorders for which there is a significant unmet or poorly met clinical need such as ADHD, SCI, Autism Spectrum Disorder (“ASD”), FXS, treatment resistant epilepsy, neuropathic pain and additional CNS-driven disorders. We are focused presently on developing drugs known as AMPAkines (PAMs at AMPA receptors) and GABAkines (PAMs at GABAA receptors).

Through an extensive AMPAkine translational research effort from the cellular level through Phase 2 clinical trials, the Company has developed a family of novel, low impact AMPAkines, including CX717, CX1739 and CX1942 that may have clinical application in the treatment of schizophreniaCNS-driven neurobehavioral and cognitive disorders, SCI, neurological diseases, and certain orphan indications. From our AMPAkine program, our lead clinical compounds, CX717 and CX1739, have successfully completed multiple Phase 1 safety trials. Both compounds have also completed Phase 2 efficacy trials demonstrating target engagement, by antagonizing the ability of opioids to induce respiratory depression. CX717 has successfully completed a Phase 2 trial demonstrating the ability to significantly reduce the symptoms of adult ADHD. In November 2007, Organon was acquired by Schering-Plough Corporationan early Phase 2 study, CX1739 improved breathing in patients with central sleep apnea (“Schering-Plough”CSA”). Preclinical studies have highlighted the potential ability of these AMPAkines to improve motor function in animals with SCI. Subject to raising sufficient financing (of which no assurance can be provided), we believe that we will be able to rapidly initiate a human Phase 2 study with CX1739 or CX717 in patients with spinal cord injury and a human Phase 2B study in patients with ADHD with either CX1739 or CX717.

In November 2009, Schering-Plough was acquired by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (“Merck”). Followingorder to expand our neuromodulator asset base, we entered into an option agreement with UWMRF which option we exercised effective August 1, 2020 resulting in the merger with Schering-Plough, in September 2010, Merck notifiedestablishment of the UWMRF Patent License Agreement. Under the UWMRF Patent License Agreement, UWMRF granted to the Company an exclusive license to commercialize GABAkine products based on UWMRF’s rights in certain patents and patent applications, and a non-exclusive license to commercialize products based on UWMRF’s rights in certain technology that is not the subject of the patents or patent applications. See Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies – Significant Agreements and Contracts – UWMRF Patent License Agreement.

Certain of these GABAkines have shown impressive activity in a broad range of animal models of treatment resistant epilepsy and other convulsant disorders, as well as in brain tissue samples obtained from epileptic patients in research conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee by Dr. James Cook and by Dr. Jeffrey Witkin of the Indiana University School of Medicine, among others at collaborating institutions. Epilepsy is a chronic and highly prevalent neurological disorder that affects millions of people world-wide. While many anticonvulsant drugs have been approved to decrease seizure probability, seizures are not well controlled and, in as many as 60-70% of patients, existing drugs are not efficacious at some point in the disease progression. We believe that the medical and patient community are in clear agreement that there is desperate need for improved antiepileptic drugs. In addition, these GABAkines have shown positive activity in animal models of migraine, inflammatory and neuropathic pain, as well as other areas of interest. Because of these compounds’ GABA receptor subunit specificity, we believe the compounds have a greatly reduced liability to produce sedation, motor incoordination, memory impairments and tolerance, side effects commonly associated with non-specific GABA PAMs, such as benzodiazepines.

Building upon the AMPAkine and GABAkine programs as a foundation, we established a second business unit called EndeavourRx which focuses on developing novel neuromodulators for disorders resulting from alterations in neurotransmission.

Financing our Platforms

Our major challenge has been to raise substantial equity or equity-linked financing to support research and development plans for our cannabinoid and neuromodulator platforms, while minimizing the dilutive effect to pre-existing stockholders. At present, we believe that we are hindered primarily by our public corporate structure, our OTCQB listing, and low market capitalization as a result of our low stock price. For this reason, the Company is considering an internal restructuring plan that contemplates spinning out our two drug platforms into separate operating businesses or subsidiaries.

We believe that by creating one or more subsidiaries to further the aims of ResolutionRx and EndeavourRx, it may be possible, through separate finance channels, to optimize the asset values of both the cannabinoid platform and the neuromodulator platform.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it would not be proceeding further withis a going concern, which contemplates the AMPAKINE technology.

realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses of $1,762,855 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $2,115,033 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 respectively, as well as negative operating cash flows of $106,448 for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and $487,745 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The Company also had a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,846,748 at June 30, 2020 and expects to continue to incur net losses and negative operating cash flows for at least the next few years. As a result, rightsmanagement has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the use of AMPAKINE compoundsCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its audit report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the treatment of schizophrenia and depression were returned to the Company. Merck no longer has license rights to useyear ended December 31, 2019, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s patents or know-how. Merck retains ownership of compounds developed by Organon or developed jointly by Organon and the Company during the collaboration. ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is freecurrently, and has for some time, been in significant financial distress. It has extremely limited cash resources and current assets and has no ongoing source of sustainable revenue. Management is continuing to pursue strategic opportunities for alladdress various aspects of its other AMPAKINE compounds in schizophrenia and depression.

In October 2000, the Company entered into a research collaboration agreement and an exclusive license agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier (“Servier”). The agreements, as amended to date, will enable Servier to develop and commercialize select AMPAKINE compounds for the treatment of (i) declines in cognitive performance associated with aging, (ii) neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, and (iii) anxiety disorders. In early December 2006, the Company terminated the research collaboration with Servier. The license agreement with Servier, as amended to date, continues in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. In November 2010, Servier selected a jointly discovered AMPAKINE compound to advance into Phase I clinical testing. Should the compound be successfully commercialized by Servier, the Company would receive payments based upon key clinical development milestones and royalty payments on sales in licensed territories.

In March 2010, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Biovail pursuant to which Biovail acquired the Company’s rights to certain AMPAKINE compoundsoperations and relatedobligations, including, without limitation, debt obligations, financing requirements, establishment of new and maintenance and improvement of existing and in-process intellectual property, licensing agreements, legal and patent matters and regulatory compliance, and has taken steps to continue to raise new debt and equity capital to fund the Company’s business activities from both related and unrelated parties to fund the Company’s business activities.

The Company is continuing its efforts to raise additional capital in order to be able to pay its liabilities and fund its business activities on a going forward basis, including CX717, for use in the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. As partpursuit of the transaction, Biovail licensed backCompany’s planned research and development activities. The Company regularly evaluates various measures to satisfy the Company’s liquidity needs, including development and other agreements with collaborative partners and, when necessary, seeking to exchange or restructure the Company’s outstanding securities. The Company exclusiveis evaluating certain changes to its operations and irrevocable rightsstructure to certainfacilitate raising capital from sources that may be interested in financing only discrete aspects of the acquired AMPAKINE compounds for use outsideCompany’s development programs. Such changes could include a significant reorganization, which may include the formation of the fieldone or more subsidiaries into which one or more of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. In September 2010, Biovail merged with Valeant.our programs may be contributed. As a result of Valeant’s mergerthe Company’s current financial situation, the Company has limited access to external sources of debt and changesequity financing. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to secure additional financing in strategic directions for the combined company, Valeant announcedamounts necessary to fully fund its intent to exit several therapeutic development programs, includingoperating and debt service requirements. If the respiratory depression project acquired from the Company. The Company is in discussions with Valeant regarding the future of the project and under the agreement between the Company and Biovail, all contractual obligations remain in place.

To supplement its existingunable to access sufficient cash resources, in addition to seeking licensing arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies, the Company may seekbe forced to raise additional capitaldiscontinue its operations entirely and liquidate.

F-47

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and include the financial statements of RespireRx and its wholly owned subsidiary, Pier. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include, among other things, accounting for potential liabilities, and the assumptions used in valuing stock-based compensation issued for services. Actual amounts may differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company limits its exposure to credit risk by investing its cash with high quality financial institutions. The Company’s cash balances may periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced a loss in such accounts to date.

Value of Financial Instruments

The authoritative guidance with respect to value of financial instruments established a value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure value into three levels and requires that assets and liabilities carried at value be classified and disclosed in one of three categories, as presented below. Disclosure as to transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 value measurements, is also required.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for an identical asset or liability that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include active-exchange traded securities and exchange-based derivatives.

Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include fixed income securities, non-exchange based derivatives, mutual funds, and fair-value hedges.

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data for the sale of debtasset or equity. There can be no assurance that such capital will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If additionalliability which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include infrequently traded, non-exchange-based derivatives and commingled investment funds, and are raised by issuing equity securities, dilution to existing stockholders is likely to result.

measured using present value pricing models.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when all fourdetermines the level in the value hierarchy within which each value measurement falls in its entirety, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the value measurement in its entirety. In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs an analysis of the following criteriaassets and liabilities at each reporting period end.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments (consisting of cash, cash equivalents, and accounts payable and accrued expenses) are met: (i) pervasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) deliveryconsidered by the Company to be representative of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii)respective values of these instruments due to the fees earned can be readily determined;short-term nature of those instruments. With respect to the note payable to SY Corporation (as defined below) and (iv) collectibilitythe convertible notes payable, management does not believe that the credit markets have materially changed for these types of borrowings since the original borrowing date. The Company considers the carrying amounts of the fees is reasonably assured.notes payable to officers, inclusive of accrued interest, to be representative of the respective values of such instruments due to the short-term nature of those instruments and their terms.

Amounts received for upfront technology license

F-48

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs incurred in connection with ongoing debt and equity financings, including legal fees, under multiple-element arrangements are deferred until the related financing is either completed or abandoned.

Costs related to abandoned debt or equity financings are charged to operations in the period of abandonment. Costs related to completed equity financings are netted against the proceeds.

Capitalized Financing Costs

The Company presents debt issuance costs related to debt obligations in its consolidated balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt obligation, consistent with the presentation for debt discounts.

Convertible Notes Payable

Convertible notes are evaluated to determine if they should be recorded at amortized cost. To the extent that there are associated warrants or a beneficial conversion feature, the convertible notes and warrants are evaluated to determine if there are embedded derivatives to be identified, bifurcated and valued in connection with and at the time of such financing.

Notes Exchanges

In cases where debt or other liabilities are exchanged for equity, the Company compares the carrying value of debt, inclusive of accrued interest, if applicable, being exchanged, to the value of the equity issued and records any loss or gain as a result of such exchange. See Note 4. Notes Payable.

Extinguishment of Debt and Settlement of Liabilities

The Company accounts for the extinguishment of debt and settlement of liabilities by comparing the carrying value of the debt or liability to the value of consideration paid or assets given up and recognizing a loss or gain in the condensed consolidated statement of operations in the amount of the difference in the period in which such transaction occurs.

Prepaid Insurance

Prepaid insurance represents the premium paid in March 2020 for directors and officers insurance, as well as the amortized amount of an April 2020 premium payment for office-related insurances and clinical trial coverage. Directors’ and Officers’ insurance tail coverage, purchased in March 2013 expired in March 2020 and all prepaid amounts have been fully amortized. The amounts of prepaid insurance amortizable in the ensuing twelve-month period are recorded as prepaid insurance in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at each reporting date and amortized to the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for each reporting period.

Stock-Based Awards

The Company periodically issues common stock and stock options to officers, directors, Scientific Advisory Board members, consultants and vendors for services rendered. Such issuances vest and expire according to terms established at the issuance date of each grant.

The Company accounts for stock-based payments to officers, directors, outside consultants and vendors by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant date value of the awards, with the cost recognized as compensation expense on the straight-line basis in the Company’s consolidated financial statements over the vesting period of the awards.

Stock grants, which are sometimes subject to time-based vesting, are measured at the grant date fair value and charged to operations ratably over the vesting period.

Stock options granted to members of the Company’s outside consultants and other vendors are valued on the grant date. As the stock options vest, the Company recognizes this expense over the period in which the services are provided.

The value of committed services or performance, if such arrangements requirestock options granted as stock-based payments is determined utilizing the Company’s on-going services or performance.

Revenues from milestone paymentsBlack-Scholes option-pricing model, and is affected by several variables, the most significant of which are recognized when earned, as evidenced by written acknowledgement from the collaborator, provided that (i) the milestone event is substantive and its achievement was not reasonably assured at the inceptionlife of the agreement, and (ii)equity award, the Company’s performance obligations, if any, after the milestone achievement will continue to be funded by the collaborator at a comparable level to that before the milestone was achieved. If both of these criteria are not met, the milestone payment would be recognized over the remaining minimum period of the Company’s performance obligations under the arrangement.

The Company records grant revenues as the expenses related to the grant projects are incurred. Amounts received under research grants are nonrefundable, regardless of the success of the underlying research, to the extent that such amounts are expended in accordance with the approved grant project.

Employee Stock Options and Stock-based Compensation

The Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) provides for a variety of equity vehicles to allow flexibility in implementing equity awards, including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock grants, stock appreciation rights, stock payment awards, restricted stock units and dividend equivalents to qualified employees, officers, directors, consultants and other service providers. In March 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an increase in the number of shares authorized under the 2006 Plan of 2,500,000 shares, bringing the total authorized shares purchasable thereunder to 9,863,799. In May 2010, this increase was approved by the Company’s stockholders.

The exercise price of the stock options offered under the 2006 Plan must be at least 100% ofoption as compared to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date, of grant. Ifand the person to whom an incentive stock option is granted is a 10% stockholderestimated volatility of the Company oncommon stock over the date of grant, the exercise price per share shall not be less than 110%term of the fair market value on the date of grant. Options granted generally vest over a three-year period, although options granted to officers may include more accelerated vesting. Options generally expire ten years from the date of grant, but options granted to consultants may expire five years from the date of grant.

The Company recognizes expense in its financial statements for all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, based on their fair values, over the vesting period.

There were no employee stock options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2010. For options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the fair value of each option award was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:

   Three months  ended
September 30, 2009
  Nine months ended September 30, 
   2010  2009 

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

   2.7  3.2  2.8

Dividend yield

   0  0  0

Volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock

   102  108  101

Weighted average life

   6.9 years    6.9 years    6.9 years  

Expectedequity award. Estimated volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The Company also uses historical data to estimate the expected term of options granted and employee termination rates. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the estimated life of the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The weighted-average grant-date fair market value per share of options granted duringcommon stock is determined by reference to the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $0.17. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the weighted-average grant-date fair value per sharequoted market price of options granted was $0.14 and $0.17, respectively.

A summary of option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 for the 2006 Plan and the Company’s prior stock option plans is as follows:common stock.

 

   Shares  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Balance, December 31, 2009

   13,538,498   $1.41      

Granted

   280,000   $0.16      

Exercised

   —      —        

Forfeited

   (238,542 $0.56      

Expired

   (696,867 $2.33      
          

Balance, September 30, 2010

   12,883,089   $1.35     5.6 years     —    

Exercisable, September 30, 2010

   10,042,767   $1.66     4.7 years     —    

As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $233,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements. That non-cash cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.

Stock options and warrants issued to non-employees as compensation for services to be provided to the Company by non-employeesor in settlement of debt are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair value of the stock option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. Management uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of the stock options and warrants issued by the Company. The Company recognizes this expense over the period in which the services are provided. This expense is a non-cash charge

The Company recognizes the value of stock-based payments in general and has no impact onadministrative costs and in research and development costs, as appropriate, in the Company’s available cash or working capital.

There were no stock option exercises during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 or 2009.condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company issues new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option and warrant exercises.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be credited to operations in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383, use of the Company’s net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be limited if a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% occurs within any three-year period since the last ownership change. The Company may have had a change in control under these Sections. However, the Company does not anticipate performing a complete analysis of the limitation on the annual use of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards until the time that it anticipates it will be able to utilize these tax attributes.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters and does not anticipate any material amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income taxes and income taxes of various state tax jurisdictions. As the Company’s net operating losses have yet to be utilized, all previous tax years remain open to examination by Federal authorities and other jurisdictions in which the Company currently operates or has operated in the past.

The Company accounts for uncertainties in income tax law under a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns as prescribed by GAAP. The tax effects of a position are recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority as of the reporting date. If the tax position is not considered “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, then no benefits of the position are recognized. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had not recorded any liability for uncertain tax positions. In subsequent periods, any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be recognized as a component of income tax expense.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The note payable to SY Corporation (as defined below), which is denominated in a foreign currency (the South Korean Won), is translated into the Company’s functional currency (the United States Dollar) at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. The foreign currency exchange gain or loss resulting from translation is recognized in the related condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Research and Development

Research and development costs include compensation paid to management directing the Company’s research and development activities, including but not limited to compensation paid to our former Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim President who is also our Chief Scientific Officer and fees paid to consultants and outside service providers and organizations (including research institutes at universities), and other expenses relating to the acquisition, design, development and clinical testing of the Company’s treatments and product candidates.

License Agreements

Obligations incurred with respect to mandatory payments provided for in license agreements are recognized ratably over the appropriate period, as specified in the underlying license agreement, and are recorded as liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding charge to research and development costs in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations. Obligations incurred with respect to milestone payments provided for in license agreements are recognized when it is probable that such milestone will be reached and are recorded as liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding charge to research and development costs in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations. Payments of such liabilities are made in the ordinary course of business.

Patent Costs

Due to the significant uncertainty associated with the successful development of one or more commercially viable products based on the Company’s research efforts and any related patent applications, all patent costs, including patent-related legal and filing fees, are expensed as incurred and recorded as general and administrative expenses.

Earnings per Share

The Company’s computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) includes basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (e.g., warrants and options) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.

Net loss attributable to common stockholders consists of net loss, as adjusted for actual and deemed preferred stock dividends declared, amortized or accumulated.

Loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted loss per common share is the same for all periods presented because all warrants and stock options outstanding are anti-dilutive.

At June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company excluded the outstanding securities summarized below, which entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock, from its calculation of earnings per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

  June 30, 
  2020  2019 
Series B convertible preferred stock  11   11 
Convertible notes payable  55,578,272   564,797 
Common stock warrants  124,514,653   1,876,198 
Common stock options  4,188,630   4,333,763 
Total  184,281,566   6,774,769 

Reclassifications

Certain comparative figures in 2019 have been reclassified to conform to the current quarter’s presentation. These reclassifications were immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-06, Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The subtitle is Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. This Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) addresses complex financial instruments that have characteristics of both debt and equity. The application of this ASU would reduce the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock. Limiting the accounting models would result in fewer embedded conversion features being separately recognized from the host contract as compared with current GAAP. Convertible instruments that continue to be subject to separation models are (1) those with embedded conversion features that are not clearly and closely related to the host contract, that meet the definition of a derivative, and that do not qualify for a scope exception from derivative accounting and (2) convertible debt instruments issued with substantial premiums for which the premiums are recorded as paid-in capital. The Company has historically issued complex financial instruments and has considered whether embedded conversion features have existed within those contracts or whether derivatives would appropriately be bifurcated. To date, no such bifurcation has been necessary. However, it is possible that this ASU may have a substantial impact on the Company’s financial statements. Management is evaluating the potential impact. This ASU becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023.

In March 2020, The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-03, Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments. There are seven issues addressed in this update. Issues 1 through 5 were clarifications and codifications of previous updates. Issue 3 relates only to depository and lending institutions and therefore would not be applicable to the Company. Issue 6 was a clarification on determining the contractual term of a net investment in a lease for purposes of measuring expected credit losses, an issue not applicable to the Company. Issue 7 relates to the regaining control of financial assets sold and the recordation of an allowance for credit losses. The amendment related to issues 1, 2, 4 and 5 become effective immediately upon adoption of the update. Issue 3 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Issues 6 and 7 become effective on varying dates that relate to the dates of adoption other updates. Management’s initial analysis is that it does not believe the new guidance will substantially impact the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued an amendment to the guidance on income taxes which is intended to simplify the accounting for income taxes. The amendment eliminates certain exceptions related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period, and the recognition of the deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The amendment also clarifies existing guidance related to the recognition of franchise tax, the evaluation of a step up in the tax basis of goodwill, and the effects of enacted changes in tax laws or rates in the effective tax rate computation, among other clarifications. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Management is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued an amendment to the guidance on the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. The amendment updates the guidance for measuring and recording credit losses on financial assets measured and amortized cost by replacing the “incurred loss” model with an “expected loss” model. Accordingly, these financial assets will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The amendment also requires that credit losses related to available-for-sale debt securities be recorded as an allowance through net income rather than reducing the carrying amount under the current, other-than-temporary-impairment model. The guidance is effective for smaller reporting companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

4. Notes Payable

Convertible Notes Payable

Q2 2020 Convertible Notes

RespireRx and Power Up Lending Group Ltd. (the “Lender”) entered into Securities Purchase Agreements, dated as of April 15, 2020 and June 7, 2020 (each, a “Power Up Agreement”), by which the Lender loaned $53,000 and $43,000, respectively, to RespireRx in return for two convertible promissory notes (the “April 2020 Note” and the “June 2020 Note” respectively), a limited guaranty associated with the April 2020 Note, and the delivery into escrow of a confession of judgment in favor of the Lender for the amount of the April 2020 Note plus fees and costs to be filed by the Lender upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in the April 2020 Note) and other transaction-related documents associated with both the April 2020 Note and the June 2020 Note. The proceeds of the loans, which equal $90,000 after payment of $5,000 in legal fees and $1,000 in due diligence fees, are being used for general corporate purposes.

The April 2020 Note and the June 2020 Note will be payable on April 15, 2021 and June 7, 2021, respectively (each, a “Maturity Date”), and bear interest at a rate equal to 12% per annum, with any amount of principal or interest which is not paid when due bearing interest at the rate of 22% per annum.

The Lender has the right, at any time during the period beginning on the date that is 180 days following the date of each of the notes and ending on the later of (i) the applicable Maturity Date and (ii) the date of payment of the Default Amount (as defined in the notes), to convert any outstanding and unpaid amount of the notes into shares of RespireRx’s common stock or securities convertible into RespireRx’s common stock (“2020 Note Conversion Shares”), provided that such conversion would not result in the Lender beneficially owning more than 4.99% of RespireRx’s common stock. Subject to certain limitations and adjustments as described in the notes, the Lender may convert at a per share conversion price equal to 61% of the lowest trading price of the common stock as reported by the exchange on which RespireRx’s shares are traded, for the twenty trading days prior to, but excluding, the day upon which a notice of conversion is received by RespireRx. Upon the conversion of all amounts due under each of the April 2020 Note and the June 2020 Note, each would be deemed repaid and terminated.

RespireRx may prepay the outstanding principal amount under the April 2020 Note and the June 2020 Note by paying a certain percentage of the sum of the outstanding principal, interest, default interest and other amounts owed. Such percentage varies from 120% to 145% depending on the period in which the prepayment occurs, as set forth in the April 2020 Note and June 2020 Note, respectively. During the period in which each note is outstanding, subject to certain limited exceptions, RespireRx must notify the Lender in advance of closing of any financing transactions with third party investors. At the Lender’s discretion, RespireRx must amend and restate each note, including its conversion terms, and the 2020 Note Conversion Shares to be identical to the instruments evidencing such financing transaction.

In consideration of and to induce the Lender to consummate the April 2020 Note referenced herein, the Chief Financial Officer of RespireRx (the “CFO”), on April 15, 2020, issued a limited guaranty in favor of the Lender whereby the CFO guaranteed to the Lender the prompt and full performance and observance by RespireRx of its obligation to promptly cooperate in processing all notices of conversions issued pursuant to the April 2020 Note.

Both the April 2020 Note and the June 2020 Note and the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion thereof were offered and sold to the Lender in reliance upon specific exemptions from the registration requirements of United States federal and state securities laws, which include Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and Rule 506 promulgated by the SEC under the 1933 Act. Pursuant to these exemptions, the Lender represented to RespireRx under each Power Up Agreement, among other representations, that it was an “accredited investor” as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the 1933 Act.

The outstanding amounts of the April 2020 Note and June 2020 Note consist of the following at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

  June 30, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Principal amount of notes payable $96,000  $               -  
Unamortized portion of note discounts  (82,254)    
Accrued interest payable  1,649   - 
  $15,395  $- 

2019 Convertible Notes

On November 4, 2019, October 22, 2019, August 19, 2019, May 17, 2019 and April 24, 2019, the Company issued a series of convertible notes (“2019 Convertible Notes”), all similar in nature, all subject to debt issuance costs (“DIC”) and original issue discount (“OID”) and beneficial conversion (“BCF”) features and some subject to the issuance of warrants (“NW”) and/or commitment shares (“CS”) and placement agent fees. Two of the notes had maturity dates nine months after issuance and three were for one year. One note was a master note agreement in the amount of $150,000, but with an initial drawdown of $50,000. The Company evaluated all of the terms of the 2019 Convertible Notes and determined that, in accordance with ASC 815, there were no derivatives to be bifurcated or separately valued. Each of the April, 24, 2019, August 19, 2019 and October 22, 2019 Convertible Notes was satisfied in full by the lenders electing to convert the outstanding balances to common stock during the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and the May 17, 2019 Convertible Note, the maturity date of which was extended to November 17, 2020, was satisfied in full by the lenders electing to convert the outstanding balances to common stock during the three-months ended June 30, 2020, except for $2,747 of accrued interest that remains outstanding. The 2019 Convertible Notes that have balances outstanding as of June 30, 2020 are summarized in the table below.

Inception date Maturity date Original principal amount  Interest rate  Original aggregate DIC, OID, BCF, NW and CS  Cumulative amortization of DIC, OID, BCF, NW and CS  Principal remaining at June 30, 2020  Accrued Interest at June 30, 2020  Balance sheet carrying amount at June 30, 2020 inclusive of accrued interest 
November 4, 2019 November 4, 2020 $170,000   10% $170,000  $148,211  $30,500  $1,964  $10,675 
May 17, 2019 May 17, 2020, extended to November 17, 2020 $50,000   10% $50,000  $50,000  $-  $2,747  $2,747 
                               
  Total $220,000      $220,000  $198,211  $30,500  $4,711  $13,422 

2018 Q4 and 2019 Q1 Notes and Original Convertible Notes

On December 6, 2018, December 7, 2018 and December 31, 2018 the Company issued convertible notes (each a “2018 Q4 Note”) and on January 2, 2019, February 27, 2019, March 6, 2019 and March 14, 2019, the Company issued additional convertible notes (each a “2019 Q1 Note”, respectively and collectively with the “2018 Q4, the “2018 Q4 and 2019 Q1 Notes”) bearing interest at 10% per year. All of the 2018 Q4 and 2019 Q1 Notes matured on either February 28, 2019 or April 30, 2019. The original aggregate principal amount was $190,000. None of the 2018 Q4 and 2019 Q1 Notes were repaid at maturity. The 2018 Q4 and 2019 Q1 Note investors also received an aggregate of 190,000 common stock purchase warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black Scholes option pricing model calculated on the date of each grant and had an aggregate value of $146,805. Total value received by the investors was $336,805, the sum of the face value of the convertible note and the value of the warrant. Therefore, the Company recorded a debt discount associated with the warrant issuance of $82,159 and an initial value of the convertible notes of $107,841 using the relative fair value method. All debt discounts were fully amortized by the original maturity dates. On March 21, 2020, all except one of the 2018 Q4 and 2019 Q1 Note holders exchanged the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest for shares of common stock. The exchange price was $0.015 per share of common stock. The closing price on March 20, 2020, the last trading day before the closing of the exchange agreements which took place on a Saturday, was $0.034 per share of common stock. An aggregate of $155,000 of principal and $17,911 of accrued interest was exchanged for 11,527,407 shares of common stock. The Company recorded a loss on the extinguishment of the exchanged 2018 Q4 Notes and 2019 Q1 Notes of $219,021. As of June 30, 2020, there remains one outstanding 2018 Q4 Note and one outstanding 2019 Q1 Note, both held by the same single investor, with an aggregate principal amount of $35,000 and aggregate accrued interest of $5,321 as of June 30, 2020. The 2019 Convertible Notes discussed above, which the Company does not consider to have arisen from one or more offerings, may be interpreted in such a way that the remaining 2018 Q4 Note and 2019 Q1 Note holders had the right to convert or exchange into such notes. However, no holder of the Q4 2018 and 2019 Notes has requested such a conversion or exchange. The Company does not believe that an offering occurred as of June 30, 2020 or as of the date of the issuance of these financial statements. Therefore, the number of shares of common stock (or preferred stock) into which the remaining 2018 Q4 Note and the remaining 2019 Q1 Note may convert is not determinable and the Company has not accounted for any additional consideration. The warrants to purchase 190,000 shares of common stock issued in connection with the sale of the 2018 Q4 and 2019 Q1 Notes are exercisable at a fixed price of $1.50 per share of common stock, provide no right to receive a cash payment, and included no reset rights or other protections based on subsequent equity transactions, equity-linked transactions or other events. The warrants issued to the Q4 2018 and Q1 2019 Note holders expire on December 30, 2023. The Company determined that there were no embedded derivatives to be identified, bifurcated and valued in connection with this financing.

The 2018 Q4 Notes and 2019 Q1 Notes consist of the following at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

  June 30, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Principal amount of notes payable $35,000  $190,000 
Accrued interest payable  5,321   17,976 
  $40,321  $207,976 

Other convertible notes were also sold to investors in 2014 and 2015 (the “Original Convertible Notes), which aggregated a total of $579,500, and had a fixed interest rate of 10% per annum. The Original Convertible Notes have no reset rights or other protections based on subsequent equity transactions, equity-linked transactions or other events. The warrants to purchase shares of common stock issued in connection with the sale of the Original Convertible Notes have either been exchanged for common stock or expired.

On March 21, 2020, the holder of one of the Original Convertible Notes exchanged $50,000 of principal and $32,875 of accrued interest for 5,525,017 shares of the Company’s common stock. The exchange price was $0.015 per share of common stock. The closing price on March 20, 2020, the last trading day before the closing of the exchange agreements, was $0.034 per share of common stock. The Company recorded a loss on the extinguishment of the exchanged Original Convertible Note of $104,975.

The remaining outstanding Original Convertible Notes (including that for which a default notice has been received) consist of the following at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

  June 30, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Principal amount of notes payable $75,000  $125,000 
Accrued interest payable  57,616   82,060 
  $132,616  $207,060 

As of June 30, 2020, principal and accrued interest on the Original Convertible Note that is subject to a default notice accrues annual interest at 12% instead of 10%, totalled $46,230, of which $21,230 was accrued interest. As of December 31, 2019, principal and accrued interest on Original Convertible Notes subject to default notices totalled $43,666 of which $18,666 was accrued interest.

As of June 30,2020 all of the outstanding Original Convertible Notes, inclusive of accrued interest, were convertible into an aggregate of 11,658 shares of the Company’s common stock. Such Original Convertible Notes will continue to accrue interest until exchanged, paid or otherwise discharged. There can be no assurance that any of the additional holders of the remaining Original Convertible Notes will exchange their Original Convertible Notes.

Note Payable to SY Corporation Co., Ltd.

On June 25, 2012, the Company borrowed 465,000,000 Won (the currency of South Korea, equivalent to approximately $400,000 United States Dollars as of that date) from and executed a secured note payable to SY Corporation Co., Ltd., formerly known as Samyang Optics Co. Ltd. (“SY Corporation”), an approximately 20% common stockholder of the Company at that time. SY Corporation was a significant stockholder and a related party at the time of the transaction but has not been a significant stockholder or related party of the Company subsequent to December 31, 2014. The note accrues simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum and had a maturity date of June 25, 2013. The Company has not made any payments on the promissory note. At June 30, 2013 and subsequently, the promissory note was outstanding and in default, although SY Corporation has not issued a notice of default or a demand for repayment. Management believes that SY Corporation is in default of its obligations under its January 2012 license agreement, as amended, with the Company, but the Company has not yet issued a notice of default. The Company has in the past made several efforts towards a comprehensive resolution of the aforementioned matters involving SY Corporation. During the six-months ended June 30, 2020, there were no further communications between the Company and SY Corporation.

The promissory note is secured by collateral that represents a lien on certain patents owned by the Company, including composition of matter patents for certain of the Company’s high impact AMPAkine compounds and the low impact AMPAkine compounds CX2007 and CX2076, and other related compounds. The security interest does not extend to the Company’s patents for its AMPAkine compounds CX1739 and CX1942, or to the patent for the use of AMPAkine compounds for the treatment of respiratory depression.

Note payable to SY Corporation consists of the following at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

  June 30, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Principal amount of note payable $399,774  $399,774 
Accrued interest payable  387,201   363,280 
Foreign currency transaction adjustment  (26,760)  3,182 
  $760,215  $766,236 

Interest expense with respect to this promissory note was $11,960 and $11,829 for the three-months and was $23,921 and $23,789 for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Notes Payable to Officers and Former Officers

For the three-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, $2,817 and $2,561 and for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, $5,633 and $5,094 was charged to interest expense with respect to Dr. Arnold S. Lippa’s notes, respectively.

For the three-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, $4,228 and $3,843 and for the six-months ended June 30, 2020, $8,439 and $7,645 was charged to interest expense with respect to Dr. James S. Manuso’s notes, respectively.

As of September 30, 2018, Dr. James S. Manuso resigned as executive officer in all capacities and as a member of the Board. All of the interest expense noted above for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, was incurred while Dr. Manuso was no longer an officer.

Other Short-Term Notes Payable

Other short-term notes payable at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 consisted of premium financing agreements with respect to various insurance policies. At June 30, 2020, a premium financing agreement was payable in the initial amount of $70,762, with interest at11% per annum, in nine monthly installments of $8,256. In addition, there is a balance of $11,532 of short-term financing of office and clinical trials insurance premiums that includes a prior period premium financing of $2,317. At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the aggregate amount of the short-term notes payable was $67,262 and $4,635 respectively.

5. Settlement and Payment Agreements

On December 16, 2019, RespireRx and Salamandra, LLC (“Salamandra”) entered into an amendment to the settlement agreement and release, executed August 21, 2019 (the “Original Settlement Agreement” and as amended, the “Amended Settlement Agreement”) regarding $202,395 owed by the Company to Salamandra (as reduced by any further payments by the Company to Salamandra, the “Full Amount”) in connection with an arbitration award previously granted in favor of Salamandra in the Superior Court of New Jersey. Under the terms of the Original Settlement Agreement, the Company was to pay Salamandra $125,000 on or before November 30, 2019 in full satisfaction of the Full Amount owed, subject to conditions regarding the Company’s ability to raise certain dollar amounts of working capital. Under the Amended Settlement Agreement, (i) the Company was to pay and the Company paid to Salamandra $25,000 on or before December 21, 2019, (ii) upon such payment, Salamandra ceased all collection efforts against the Company until March 31, 2020 (the “Threshold Date”), and (iii) the Company was to pay to Salamandra $100,000 on or before the Threshold Date if the Company had at that time raised $600,000 in working capital. Such payments by the Company would have constituted satisfaction of the Full Amount owed and would have served as consideration for the dismissal of the action underlying the arbitration award and the mutual releases set forth in the Amended Settlement Agreement. If the Company had raised less than $600,000 in working capital before the Threshold Date, the Company was to pay to Salamandra an amount equal to 21% of the working capital amount raised, in which case such payment would have reduced the Full Amount owed on a dollar-for-dollar basis, and Salamandra would then have been able to seek collection on the remainder of the debt. The Company made the initial payment of $25,000 in December 2019, but did not make the subsequent required payment on March 31, 2020, nor has any payment been made during the three-months ended June 30, 2020. The Company has initiated further discussions with the intent of reaching a revised settlement agreement which cannot be assured.

In June 2020, the Company made a settlement proposal to a vendor, the terms of which, if accepted by the vendor would supersede a prior agreement in principle originally reached on September 23, 2019 regarding the payment schedule of undisputed amounts owed by the Company to the vendor. The current proposal includes, among other things, an extension of time until December 31, 2020 to raise the amounts owed. Neither the original agreement in principle nor the discussion of amendments has resulted in a formal agreement. The original agreement in principle called for a payment of a minimum of $100,000 on or before November 30, 2019 assuming the Company had raised at least $600,000 by that date and thereafter called for a payment of $50,000 per month until paid in full. No payments had been made through June 30, 2020 with respect to the original agreement in principle. The currently proposed settlement has not yet been accepted and is being reviewed by the vendor and calls for a payment of $100,000 if RespireRx is able to raise $700,000 by December 31, 2020 with subsequent settlement payments of $50,000 per month with a residual final payment of less than $50,000 representing the remaining balance. Under the proposal, if RespireRx raises less than $700,000 by December 31, 2020, the Company may cancel a portion of the amount owed to the vendor by paying at least 21% of the working capital raised which amount would reduce the amount owed dollar-for-dollar and the vendor would be able to seek collection of the balance.

The due date of the $100,000 annual amount payable to the University of Illinois that was originally due on December 31, 2019 pursuant to the 2014 License Agreement (as defined below), was extended to June 30, 2020 and further extended to July 7, 2020 when it was paid in full (See Note 9. Subsequent Events).

6. Stockholders’ Deficiency

Reserved and Unreserved Shares of Common Stock

At June 30, 2020, RespireRx had 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock authorized and 222,307,381 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. RespireRx has reserved 11 shares of common stock for conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock, 55,578,263 shares of common stock for conversion of various convertible notes, 124,514,653 for warrant exercises and 4,188,630 for the exercise of outstanding options. RespireRx has reserved 63,236 shares of common stock with respect unissued shares available for issuance from the 2014 Plan and 54,427,342 shares of common stock with respect to unissued shares available for issuance from the 2015 Plan. RespireRx has reserved 6,497 Pier Contingent shares. There are 538,913,987 shares of common stock available for issuance. The above amounts do not include contractual reserve requirements of certain convertible notes and exercisable warrants in excess of actual conversion or exercise amounts. RespireRx believes that the common stock available for issuance is adequate to meet the contractual reserve requirements at all times.

Preferred Stock

RespireRx has authorized a total of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, 1,250,000 shares were designated as 9% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock; 37,500 shares were designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (non-voting, “Series B Preferred Stock”); 205,000 shares were designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock; and 1,700 shares were designated as Series G 1.5% Convertible Preferred Stock. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, 3,505,800 shares of preferred stock were undesignated and were able to be issued with such rights and powers as the Board of Directors may designate. On July 13, 2020, RespireRx designated 1,200 shares of Series H, Voting, Non-participating, Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series H Preferred Stock”) reducing the number of shares of preferred stock that were undesignated to 3,504,600 as of July 13, 2020 (See Note 9. Subsequent Events).

Series B Preferred Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2020 and 2019 consisted of 37,500 shares issued in a May 1991 private placement. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into approximately 0.00030 shares of common stock at an effective conversion price of $2,208.375 per share of common stock, which is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding are convertible into 11 shares of common stock. RespireRx may redeem the Series B Preferred Stock for $25,001, equivalent to $0.6667 per share, an amount equal to its liquidation preference, at any time upon 30 days prior notice.

Common Stock

There were 222,307,381 shares of RespireRx’s Common Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2020. As of March 31, 2020, RespireRx did not have enough authorized shares to reserve for all conversions of convertible debt as well as common stock purchase options and warrants exercises. Assuming everything had been reserved, there would have been no shares of RespireRx’s common stock available for future issuances. On March 21, 2020, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of common stock from 65,000,000 shares to 1,000,000,000 (one billion) shares subject to approval by the holders of a majority of voting stock of RespireRx, appropriate notification of all shareholders and subject to the authorized officers making the appropriate filings with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. On March 22, 2020, holders of a majority of voting stock of RespireRx consented to this increase in writing without a meeting. The amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation and increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock became effective on April 30, 2020 when RespireRx filed the amendment with the Secretary of State of Delaware.

Common Stock Warrants

Information with respect to the issuance and exercise of common stock purchase warrants in connection with the Convertible Note Payable and Warrant Purchase Agreement, and Notes Payable to Officers, is provided at Note 4 Notes Payable.

A summary of warrant activity for the ninesix-months ended June 30, 2020 is presented below.

  Number of Shares  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years) 
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2019  2,191,043  $1.87109   3.44000 
Warrants issued due to anti-dilution provisions increasing number of originally issued warrants included in December 31, 2019 balance  138,824,795   0.00153   3.70650 
Exercised  (16,501,185)  0.00157   - 
Warrants outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2020  124,514,653  $0.03272   3.78506 

The exercise prices of common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable are as follows at June 30, 2020:

Exercise Price  Warrants Outstanding (Shares)  

Warrants Exercisable

(Shares)

  Expiration Date
$0.001485   58,922,559   58,922,559  October 22, 2024
$0.001530   41,643,423   41,643,423  August 19, 2024
$0.001600   22,125,000   22,125,000  May 17, 2022
$1.000000   916,217   916,217  September 20, 2022
$1.500000   190,000   190,000  December 30, 2023
$1.562000   130,284   130,284  December 31, 2021
$1.575000   238,814   238,814  April 30, 2023
$2.750000   8,000   8000  September 20, 2022
$4.875000   108,594   108,594  September 30, 2020
$6.834800   145,758   145,758  September 30, 2020
$7.930000   86,004   86,004  February 28, 2021
     124,514,653   124,514,653   

Based on a value of $0.0064 per share on June 30, 2020, there were 122,690,982 exercisable in-the-money common stock warrants as of June 30, 2020.

A summary of warrant activity for the six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102019 is as follows:presented below.

 

   Shares  Weighted Average Per
Share Exercise Price
 

Balance, December 31, 2009

   20,195,319   $0.89  

Granted

   4,081,633   $0.21  

Exercised

   —      —    

Expired

   (150,000 $2.78  
      

Balance, September 30, 2010

   24,126,952   $0.74  
      
         Weighted 
         Average 
      Weighted  Remaining 
   Number of  Average  Contractual 
   Shares  Exercise Price  Life (in Years) 
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2018   1,783,229  $2.20393   3.06 
Issued   152,372   1.41101     
Expired   (59,403)  2.65928     
Warrants outstanding at June 30, 2019   1,876,198  $2.12512   2.79 
              
Warrants exercisable at June 30, 2019   1,876,198  $2.12512   2.79 

Warrants granted

The exercise prices of common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable are as follows at June 30, 2019:

Exercise Price  Warrants Outstanding (Shares)  Warrants Exercisable (Shares)  Expiration Date
$1.0000   916,217   916,217  September 20, 2022
$1.1800   42,372   42,372  May 17, 2022
$1.5000   190,000   190,000  December 30, 2023
$1.5620   130,284   130,284  December 31, 2021
$1.5750   238,814   238,814  April 30, 2023
$2.7500   8,000   8,000  September 20, 2022
$4.8500   5,155   5,155  September 23, 2019
$4.8750   108,594   108,594  September 30, 2020
$5.0000   5,000   5,000  September 22, 2019
$6.8348   145,758   145,758  September 30, 2020
$7.9300   86,004   86,004  February 28, 2021
     1,876,198   1,876,198   

Based on a fair market value of $0.70 per share on June 30, 2019, there was no intrinsic value of exercisable in-the-money common stock warrants as of June 30, 2019.

Stock Options

On March 18, 2014, RespireRx adopted its 2014 Equity, Equity-Linked and Equity Derivative Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”). The Plan permits the grant of options and restricted stock with respect to up to 325,025 shares of common stock, in addition to stock appreciation rights and phantom stock, to directors, officers, employees, consultants and other service providers of the Company.

On June 30, 2015, the Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan (as amended, the “2015 Plan”). As of March 31, 2020, there were 8,985,260 shares that may be issued under the 2015 Plan. On May 5, 2020 the Board of Directors increased the number of shares that may be issued under the 2015 Plan to 58,985,260. On July 31, 2020 the Board of Directors increased the number of shares that may be issued under the 2015 Plan to 158,985, 260. (See Note 9. Subsequent Events). The Company has not and does not intend to present the 2015 Plan to stockholders for approval.

Other than the change in the number of shares available under the 2015 Plan, no other changes were made to the 2015 Plan by these amendments noted above.

There were no stock or stock option grants during the ninethree-months and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010 were issued2020 or in the three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2019.

See Note 9. Subsequent Events for a description of stock options granted on July 31, 2020.

Information with respect to the Black-Scholes variables used in connection with the conversionevaluation of the promissory notefair value of stock-based compensation costs and fees is provided at Note 3 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

A summary of stock option activity for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 is presented below.

   

Number of

Shares

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted

Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)

 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2019   4,287,609  $3.3798   4.98 
Expired   (98,979)  6.6242   - 
Options outstanding at June 30, 2020   4,188,630  $3.3031   4.59 
              
Options exercisable at June 30, 2020   4,188,630  $3.3031   4.59 

The exercise prices of common stock options outstanding and exercisable were as follows at June 30, 2020:

Exercise Price  Options Outstanding (Shares)  

Options

Exercisable

(Shares)

  Expiration Date
$0.7000   21,677   21,677  November 21, 2023
$1.1200   310,388   310,388  April 5, 2023
$1.2500   16,762   16,762  December 7, 2022
$1.3500   34,000   34,000  July 28, 2022
$1.4500   1,849,418   1,849,418  December 9, 2027
$1.4500   100,000   100,000  December 9, 2027
$2.0000   285,000   285,000  June 30, 2022
$2.0000   25,000   25,000  July 26, 2022
$3.9000   395,000   395,000  January 17, 2022
$4.5000   7,222   7,222  September 2, 2021
$5.7500   2,608   2,608  September 12, 2021
$6.4025   27,692   27,692  August 18, 2020
$6.4025   129,231   129,231  August 18, 2022
$6.4025   261,789   261,789  August 18, 2025
$6.8250   8,791   8,791  December 11, 2020
$7.3775   523,077   523,077  March 31, 2021
$8.1250   169,231   169,231  June 30, 2022
$13.9750   3,385   3,385  March 14, 2024
$15.9250   2,462   2,462  February 28, 2024
$19.5000   9,487   9,487  July 17, 2022
$19.5000   6,410   6,410  August 10, 2022
     4,188,630   4,188,630   

There was no deferred compensation expense for the outstanding and unvested stock options at June 30, 2020.

Based on a fair value of $0.0064 per share on June 30, 2020, there were no exercisable in-the-money common stock options as of June 30, 2020.

7. Related Party Transactions

Dr. Arnold S. Lippa and Jeff E. Margolis, officers and directors of RespireRx since March 22, 2013, have indirect ownership and managing membership interests in Aurora Capital LLC (“Aurora”) through interests held in its members, and Jeff. E. Margolis is also an officer of Aurora. Aurora is a boutique investment banking firm specializing in the life sciences sector that is also a full-service brokerage firm.

A description of advances and notes payable to officers is provided at Note 4. Notes Payable.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Pending or Threatened Legal Action and Claims

On February 21, 2020, Sharp Clinical Services, Inc., a vendor of RespireRx, filed a complaint against RespireRx in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Bergen County related to a December 16, 2019 demand for payment of past due invoices inclusive of late fees totaling $103,890 of which $3,631 relates to late fees, seeking $100,259 plus 1.5% interest per month on outstanding unpaid invoices. Amid settlement discussions, the vendor stated on March 13, 2020 its intent to proceed to a default judgment against the Company, and the Company stated on March 14, 2020 its intent to continue settlement discussions. On May 29, 2020, a default was entered against RespireRx. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had recorded accounts payable of $99,959 to such vendor, an amount considered by Samyang Optics Co., Ltd., as discussed more fullythe Company to be reasonable given the settlement discussions that were ongoing at that time. On August 18, 2020, RespireRx communicated with Sharp Clinical Services, Inc. in an attempt to continue settlement discussions.

Related to the Salamandra matter described in Note 25. Settlements and Payments Agreements, and preceding the settlement discussions, by letter dated February 5, 2016, the Company received a demand from a law firm representing Salamandra alleging an amount due and owing for unpaid services rendered. On January 18, 2017, following an arbitration proceeding, an arbitrator awarded the vendor the full amount sought in arbitration of $146,082. Additionally, the arbitrator granted the vendor attorneys’ fees and costs of $47,937. All such amounts have been accrued at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, including accrued interest at 4.5% annually from February 26, 2018, the date of the Notesjudgment, through June 30, 2020, totalling $20,736.

By letter dated May 18, 2018, the Company received notice from counsel claiming to represent TEC Edmonton and The Governors of the University of Alberta, which purported to terminate, effective December 12, 2017, the license agreement dated May 9, 2007 between the Company and The Governors of the University of Alberta. The Company, through its counsel, disputed any grounds for termination and notified the representative that it invoked Section 13 of that license agreement, which mandates a meeting to be attended by individuals with decision-making authority to attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution to the Condensed Financial Statements,dispute. In February 2019, the Company and TEC Edmonton tentatively agreed to terms acceptable to all parties to establish a new license agreement and the form of a new license agreement. However, the Company has re-evaluated that portion of its AMPAkine program and has decided not to enter into a new agreement at this time. The lack of entry into a new agreement at this time does not affect the Company’s other AMPAkine programs and permits the Company to reallocate resources to those programs, including, but not limited to ADHD, SCI, FXS and others.

By email dated SeptemberJuly 21, 2016, the Company received a demand from an investment banking consulting firm that represented the Company in 2012 in conjunction with the Pier transaction alleging that $225,000 is due and payable for investment banking services rendered. Such amount has been included in accrued expenses at June 30, 2010.2020 and December 31, 2019.

All

The Company is periodically the subject of various pending and threatened legal actions and claims. In the opinion of management of the warrants outstandingCompany, adequate provision has been made in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of SeptemberJune 30, 2010 are immediately exercisable.

2020 and December 31, 2019 with respect to such matters, including, specifically, the matters noted above. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself if any of the matters described above results in the filing of a lawsuit or formal claim. See Note 5. Settlement and Payment Agreements for additional items and details.

Net Income (Loss) per ShareSignificant Agreements and Contracts

For

Consulting Agreement

Richard Purcell, the three months ended September 30, 2010Company’s Senior Vice President of Research and 2009 andDevelopment since October 15, 2014, provides his services to the nine months ended September 30, 2009,Company on a month-to-month basis through his consulting firm, DNA Healthlink, Inc., through which the effectCompany has contracted for his services, for a monthly cash fee of potentially issuable$12,500. Additional information with respect to shares of common stock was notthat have been issued to Mr. Purcell is provided at Note 6. Stockholders’ Deficiency. Cash compensation expense pursuant to this agreement totalled $37,500 and $75,000 for the three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, which is included in research and development expenses in the calculationCompany’s consolidated statements of diluted lossoperations for such periods.

Employment Agreements

Effective on May 6, 2020, Timothy Jones was appointed as RespireRx’s President and Chief Executive Officer and entered into an employment agreement as of that date. In addition, Mr. Jones has continued to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, a position he has held since January 28, 2020. On November 19, 2019, Mr. Jones became an advisor to the Company’s Board of Directors, a position he held until January 27, 2020. Under the employment agreement, a provisional period of “at will” employment was to expire on July 31, 2020. Neither party terminated the employment agreement prior to July 31, 2020, and on that date all rights and obligations under the agreement were deemed effective, including with respect to the certain economic obligations of the Company upon termination of Mr. Jones’ employment. The Board of Directors and Mr. Jones agreed to continue the employment agreement after the initial provisional period. The employment agreement has a termination date of September 30, 2023 and will automatically extend annually, upon the same terms and conditions, for successive periods of one year, unless either party provides written notice of its intention not to extend the term of the agreement at least 90 days prior to the applicable renewal date. On July 31, 2020, the employment agreement was amended. The terms of the amended agreement call for a base salary through September 30, 2020 of $300,000 per share given thatyear which may remain accrued but unpaid at the effectdiscretion of the Board of Directors until such time as at least $2,500,000 has been raised. If $10,000,000 or more has been raised by September 30, 2021, Mr. Jones’ base salary would be anti-dilutive.

Forincreased to $375,000 per year. Otherwise, it would remain at $300,000 annually unless increased pursuant to the nine months ended September 30, 2010,employment agreement or by the following table reconcilesBoard of Directors. Mr. Jones’ base salary is subject to cost of living increases. Since the numerators and denominatorsexpiration of the basicprovisional period, Mr. Jones is eligible for a guaranteed bonus of $200,000 on October 31,2020, $200,000 on March 31, 2021 and diluted income per share computations.

   For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 
   Income
(Numerator)
   Shares
(Denominator)
   Per-Share
Amount
 

Basic Earnings per Share:

      

Income applicable to common stock

  $2,613,194     72,851,033    $0.04  

Effect of Dilutive Securities:

      

Convertible promissory note

   550,845     5,433,232    

Options to purchase common stock

   —       7,600    
            

Diluted Earnings per Share:

      

Income applicable to common stock + assumed conversions

  $3,164,039     78,291,865    $0.04  
               

In calculating diluted earnings per share, amounts added$150,000 each six months thereafter on each March 31st and September 30th thereafter, unless the agreement is earlier terminated. At the end of the provisional period, pursuant to the numerator represent charges recordedemployment agreement, Mr. Jones was granted an option grant for the convertible promissory note (see Note 2purchase of the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements, dated September 30, 2010), including non-cash charges related to the beneficial conversion feature within the promissory note and the allocated fair value of warrants issued upon such note’s conversion.

Shares issued upon conversion of the convertible promissory note have been included in the denominator of diluted earnings per shares using the “if converted” method. As a result, shares assumed issued are weighted for the period the convertible securities were outstanding prior to conversion, and common shares actually issued are weighted for the period the shares were outstanding after conversion.

Options to purchase up to 12,703,0891,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon the expiration of the provisional period. In addition, until such time as the Company establishes comparable benefits, Mr. Jones is entitled to $1,200 per month on a tax equalized basis for health insurance and $1,000 per month on a tax equalized basis for term life insurance plus a disability policy. Mr. Jones is entitled to be reimbursed for business expenses. Mr. Jones would be entitled to a $12,000 tax equalized annual automobile allowance after the Company has raised $10,000,000. In addition, on July 31, 2020, the Board of Directors granted Mr. Jones a discretionary bonus that was a grant of an option to purchase 16,000,000 shares of common stock expiring on July 31, 2025 at a weighted average price of $1.37 per share were outstanding as of September 30, 2010, but were excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share given that the options’an exercise price exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock. Similarly, warrants to purchase up to 24,126,952 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average price of $0.74 per share were outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and were excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share given that the exercise price of the warrants exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock.

Marketable Securities

Marketable securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of any tax, reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Company utilizes observable inputs based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets to record the fair value of its marketable securities. Authoritative guidance that establishes a framework for fair value for generally accepted accounting principles in the United States deems observable inputs for identical assets as Level 1 inputs, the most reliable in the hierarchy of inputs for determining fair value measurements.

The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in interest income. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on short-term investments are included in interest income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in interest income.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company presents unrealized gains and losses on its marketable securities, classified as “available for sale,” in its statement of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income or loss on an annual basis and in a note disclosure in its quarterly reports. Other comprehensive income or loss consists of unrealized gains or losses on the Company’s marketable securities, which are comprised of corporate and foreign bonds and securities of the U.S. government or its agencies.

During the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, total comprehensive loss was approximately $526,000 and $1,728,000, respectively, and included an unrealized gain and an unrealized loss on the Company’s marketable securities of approximately $2,000 and less than $1,000, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, total comprehensive income was approximately $2,614,000 and included an unrealized gain on the Company’s marketable securities of approximately $1,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, total comprehensive loss was approximately $6,838,000, which included unrealized gains on the Company’s marketable securities of approximately $4,000.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been madeequal to the Statement of Cash Flows as of September 30, 2009 to conform to the 2010 presentation.

New Accounting Standards

In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method” (ASU 2010-17). ASU 2010-17 includes revenue-related guidance for companies that provide research or development deliverables in an arrangement in which one or more payments are contingent upon achieving uncertain future events or circumstances.

The amendments in the update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted and a company may elect, but is not required, to adopt the amendments in the update retrospectively for all prior periods.

Given that the guidance within the update is generally consistent with the Company’s existing revenue recognition considerations for its milestone payments, the Company does not believe that adoption of the update will have a material impact on either its financial position or its result of operations.

Note 2 — Convertible Promissory Note

In January 2010, the Company completed a private placement of a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $1,500,000 with a single accredited institutional investor, Samyang Optics Co., Ltd. (“Samyang”) of Korea. The promissory note accrued simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum and was convertible into unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock at Samyang’s election at any time on or after April 15, 2010 and on or before the January 15, 2011 maturity date.

In June 2010, the promissory note and the related accrued interest were converted by Samyang into a total of 10,445,579 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock at an effective conversion price of $0.147 per share.

The number of common shares issuable upon conversion of the promissory note was based upon the greater of: (i) $0.134 per share or (ii) an amount representing a 15% discount to the five-day volume weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock on July 31, 2020 of $0.0072, 25% of which vested immediately and 25% of which will vest on each of September 30, 2020, December 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Upon commencement of Mr. Jones’ employment agreement on May 6, 2020, Mr. Jones was no longer eligible to receive fees for his participation as a member of the Board of Directors. From January 1, 2020 to January 27, 2020, while Mr. Jones was an advisor to the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company accrued $3,484 for Mr. Jones’ advisory fees. From January 28, 2020 to May 5, 2020, the Company accrued $16,734 of fees for Mr. Jones’ participation as a member of the Board of Directors and $0 thereafter. From May 6, 2020 to June 30, 2020, the Company accrued $49,525 for Mr. Jones’ compensation and related benefits. These amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and in accrued compensation in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2020.

Effective May 6, 2020, with the appointment of Timothy Jones as RespireRx’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Lippa resigned the interim officer positions of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim President, positions that Dr. Lippa has assumed on October 12, 2018 after the resignation of Dr. James Manuso on September 30, 2018. Dr. Lippa continues to serve as RespireRx’s Executive Chairman and as a member of the Board of Directors as well as the Company’s Chief Scientific Officer. Dr. Lippa has been granted stock options on several occasions and is eligible to receive additional awards under RespireRx’s 2014 Plan and 2015 Plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Dr. Lippa did not receive any option to purchase shares of common stock during the three-month and six-month periods ending June 30, 2020. Additional information with respect to the stock options granted to Dr. Lippa is provided at Note 6 Stockholders’ Deficiency. Dr. Lippa is also entitled to receive, until such time as RespireRx establishes a group health plan for its employees, $1,200 per month, on a tax-equalized basis, as additional compensation to cover the cost of health coverage and up to $1,000 per month, on a tax-equalized basis, as reimbursement for a term life insurance policy and disability insurance policy. Dr. Lippa is also entitled to be reimbursed for business expenses. Cash compensation inclusive of employee benefits accrued pursuant to this agreement totalled $84,900 and $169,800 for each of the three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Dr. Lippa’s cash compensation is included in accrued compensation and related expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2020 and in research and development expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Dr. Lippa does not receive any additional compensation for serving as Executive Chairman and on the Board of Directors. On July 13, 2020, Dr. Lippa forgave $600,000 of accrued compensation and benefits and in exchange received 600 shares of Series H Preferred Stock (See Note 9. Subsequent Events).

Jeff E. Margolis currently serves as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. On August 18, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Margolis in his role at that time as Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer. Pursuant to the agreement, which was for an initial term through September 30, 2016 and later amended (and which automatically extended on September 30, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 and will automatically extend annually, upon the same terms and conditions for successive periods of one year, unless either party provides written notice of its intention not to extend the term of the agreement at least 90 days prior to the conversion date.applicable renewal date). Mr. Margolis receives an annual base salary of $300,000, and is eligible to receive performance-based annual bonus awards based upon the achievement of annual performance goals established by the Board of Directors in consultation with the executive prior to the start of such fiscal year. Additionally, Mr. Margolis has been granted stock options on several occasions and is eligible to receive additional awards under the Company’s Plans at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Mr. Margolis is also entitled to receive, until such time as the Company establishes a group health plan for its employees, $1,200 per month, on a tax-equalized basis, as additional compensation to cover the cost of health coverage and up to $1,000 per month, on a tax-equalized basis, as reimbursement for a term life insurance policy and disability insurance policy, which $1,000 per month obligation has been waived by Mr. Margolis until Mr. Margolis notifies the Company of the rescission of the waiver. Mr. Margolis is also entitled to be reimbursed for business expenses. Additional information with respect to the stock options granted to Mr. Margolis is provided at Note 6 Stockholders’ Deficiency. Recurring cash compensation accrued pursuant to this amended agreement totalled $80,400 and $169,800 for the three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, Mr. Margolis’ cash compensation is included in accrued compensation and related expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, and in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations. Mr. Margolis does not receive any additional compensation for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. On July 13, 2020, Mr. Margolis forgave $500,000 of accrued compensation and benefits and in exchange received 500 shares of Series H Preferred Stock (See Note 9. Subsequent Events).

The employment agreements between the Company and each of Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis (prior to the 2017 amendment), respectively, provided that the payment obligations associated with the first year base salary were to accrue, but no payments were to be made, until at least $2,000,000 of net proceeds from any offering or financing of debt or equity, or a combination thereof, was received by the Company, at which time scheduled payments were to commence. Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis (who are each also directors of the Company), have each agreed, effective as of August 11, 2016, to continue to defer the payment of such amounts indefinitely, until such time as the Board of Directors of the Company determines that sufficient capital has been raised by the Company or is otherwise available to fund the Company’s operations on an ongoing basis.

University of Illinois 2014 Exclusive License Agreement

On June 27, 2014, the Company entered into an Exclusive License Agreement (the “2014 License Agreement”) with the University of Illinois. The 2014 License Agreement granted the Company (i) exclusive rights to several issued and pending patents in several jurisdictions and (ii) the non-exclusive right to certain technical information that is generated by the University of Illinois in connection with certain clinical trials as specified in the 2014 License Agreement, all of which relate to the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of sleep related breathing disorders. The Company is developing dronabinol (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol), a cannabinoid, for the treatment of OSA, the most common form of sleep apnea.

The 2014 License Agreement provides for various commercialization and reporting requirements that commenced on June 30, 2015. In addition, the 2014 License Agreement provides for various royalty payments, including a royalty on net sales of 4%, payment on sub-licensee revenues of 12.5%, and a minimum annual royalty beginning in 2015 of $100,000, which is due and payable on December 31 of each year beginning on December 31, 2015. The minimum annual royalty obligation of $100,000 due on December 31, 2019, was extended to June 30, 2020 and further extended to July 7, 2020 when the obligation was paid (See Note 9. Subsequent Events). One-time milestone payments may become due based upon the achievement of certain development milestones. $350,000 will be due within five days after the dosing of the first patient is a Phase III human clinical trial anywhere in the world. $500,000 will be due within five days after the first NDA filing with FDA or a foreign equivalent. $1,000,000 will be due within twelve months of the first commercial sale. One-time royalty payments may also become due and payable. Annual royalty payments may also become due. In the year after the first application for market approval is submitted to the FDA or a foreign equivalent and until approval is obtained, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $150,000. In the year after the first market approval is obtained from the FDA or a foreign equivalent and until the first sale of a product, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $200,000. In the year after the first commercial sale of a product, the minimum annual royalty will increase to $250,000.

During each of the three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded charges to operations of $25,000, respectively, with respect to its 2020 and 2019 minimum annual royalty obligation, which is included in research and development expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three-months and six-months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

UWM Research Foundation Patent License Agreement

On August 1, 2020, RespireRx exercised its option pursuant to its option agreement dated March 2, 2020, between RespireRx and UWM Research Foundation, an affiliate of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (“UWMRF”). Upon exercise RespireRx and UWMRF executed the UWMRF Patent License Agreement effective August 1, 2020 pursuant to which RespireRx licensed the identified intellectual property.

Under the UWMRF Patent License Agreement, the Company has an exclusive license to commercialize GABAkine products based on UWMRF’s rights in certain patents and patent applications, and a non-exclusive license to commercialize products based on UWMRF’s rights in certain technology that is not the subject of the patents or patent applications. UWMRF maintains the right to use, and, upon the approval of the Company, to license, these patent and technology rights for any non-commercial purpose, including research and education. The UWMRF Patent License Agreement expires upon the later of the expiration of the Company’s payment obligations to UWMRF or the expiration of the last remaining licensed patent granted thereunder, subject to early termination upon the occurrence of certain events. The License Agreement also contains a standard indemnification provision in favor of UWMRF and confidentiality provisions obligating both parties. For additional details, see Note 9. Subsequent Events - Exercise of Option pursuant to Option Agreement with UWMRF and Commencement of UWMRF Patent License Agreement.

Noramco Inc./Purisys, LLC - Dronabinol Development and Supply Agreement

On September 4, 2018, RespireRx entered into a dronabinol Development and Supply Agreement with Noramco Inc., one of the world’s major dronabinol manufacturers. Noramco subsequently assigned this agreement (as assigned, the “Purisys Agreement”) to its subsidiary, Purisys, LLC (“Purisys”). Under the terms of the Purisys Agreement, Purisys agreed to (i) provide all of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) estimated to be needed for the clinical development process for both the first- and second-generation products (each a “Product” and collectively, the “Products”), three validation batches for New Drug Application (“NDA”) filing(s) and adequate supply for the initial inventory stocking for the wholesale and retail channels, subject to certain limitations, (ii) maintain or file valid drug master files (“DMFs”) with the FDA or any other regulatory authority and provide the Company with access or a right of reference letter entitling the Company to make continuing reference to the DMFs during the term of the agreement in connection with any regulatory filings made with the FDA by the Company, (iii) participate on a development committee, and (iv) make available its regulatory consultants, collaborate with any regulatory consulting firms engaged by the Company and participate in all FDA or Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) meetings as appropriate and as related to the API.

In connection withconsideration for these supplies and services, the conversionCompany has agreed to purchase exclusively from Purisys during the commercialization phase all API for its Products as defined in the Development and Supply Agreement at a pre-determined price subject to certain producer price adjustments and agreed to Purisys’s participation in the economic success of the commercialized Product or Products up to the earlier of the achievement of a maximum dollar amount or the expiration of a period of time.

Transactions with Bausch Health Companies Inc.

Beginning in March 2010, the Company entered into a series of asset purchase and license agreements with Biovail Laboratories International SRL, which after its merger with Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. was later renamed Bausch Health Companies Inc. (“Bausch”).

In March 2011, the Company entered into a new agreement with Bausch to re-acquire the AMPAkine compounds, patents and rights that Bausch had acquired from the Company in March 2010. The new agreement provided for potential future payments of up to $15,150,000 by the Company based upon the achievement of certain developments, including NDA submissions and approval milestones pertaining to an intravenous dosage form of the AMPAkine compounds for respiratory depression, a therapeutic area not currently pursued by the Company. Bausch is also eligible to receive additional payments of up to $15,000,000 from the Company based upon the Company’s net sales of an intravenous dosage form of these compounds for respiratory depression.

Summary of Principal Cash Obligations and Commitments

The following table sets forth the Company’s principal cash obligations and commitments for the next five fiscal years as of June 30, 2020, aggregating $2,289,770. License agreement amounts included in the 2020 column represents amounts contractually due from July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (six months) and in each of the subsequent years, represents the full year. Employment agreement amounts included in the 2020 column represent amounts contractually due from July 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020 (three months) and in one case through September 30, 2023 when such contracts expire unless extended pursuant to the terms of the contracts.

     Payments Due By Year 
  Total  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
License agreements $510,370  $50,000  $115,092  $115,093  $130,185  $100,000 
Employment agreements (1)  1,779,400   450,200   689,600   639,600   554,700   - 
Total $2,289,770  $500,200  $739,600  $654,700  $100,000  $100,000 

(1) The payment of amounts related to Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis have been deferred indefinitely, as described above at “Employment Agreements.” The payment amounts to Mr. Jones have been deferred pending the Company achieving certain financing thresholds as described above at “Employment Agreements.” The 2020 amounts include three-months of employment agreement obligations for Dr. Lippa, Mr. Jones and Mr. Margolis as their employment contracts renewed on September 30, 2019 and the 2020 obligations include the three months of obligations through September 30, 2020. In the case of Mr. Jones, the obligations extend through the first renewal date of his employment contract which is September 30, 2023. Also, in the case of Mr. Jones, guaranteed bonus obligations are included in the periods in which such amounts are due.

9. Subsequent Events

Convertible Notes

FirstFire Global Opportunties Fund LLC

On July 2, 2020, RespireRx and FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund LLC (“FF”) entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “FF SPA”) by which FF provided a sum of $125,000 to the Company, in return for a convertible promissory note with a face amount of $137,500 (which difference in value as compared to the Company was obligatedconsideration is due to an original issue to Samyang two-year warrants todiscount of $12,500), a common stock purchase up to 4,081,633 additional unregisteredwarrant for 6,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “FF Warrant”), and the Confession of Judgment (as defined below), among other agreements and obligations.

The note obligates the Company to pay interest at a rate of 10% per annum on any unpaid principal since July 2, 2020, and to make five monthly amortization payments in the amount of $30,250 each, with the first such payment due on December 2, 2020, and the final such payment, along with any unpaid principal and any accrued and unpaid interest and other fees, due on April 2, 2021. Any amount of principal or interest that is not paid when due bears interest at the rate of the lesser of 24% and the maximum amount permitted by law, from the due date to the date such amount is paid.

FF has the right, at any time, to convert any outstanding and unpaid amount of the note into shares of the Company’s common stock or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock, provided that such conversion would not result in FF beneficially owning more than 4.99% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock. Subject to certain limitations and adjustments as described in the note, FF may convert at a per share conversion price equal to $0.02, provided that upon any event of default (as defined in the note), the conversion price will equal the lower of (i) the fixed conversion price, (ii) discount to market based upon subsequent financings with other investors, or (iii) 60% multiplied by the lowest traded price of the common stock of the Company during the twenty-one consecutive trading day (as defined in the note) period immediately preceding the date of such conversion. Upon such conversion, all rights with respect to the portion of the note being so converted terminate, except for the right to receive the Company’s common stock or other securities, cash or other assets as provided in the note due upon such conversion.

The Company may, with prior written notice to FF, prepay the outstanding principal amount under the note during the initial 180 day period after the Effective Date by making a payment to FF of an amount in cash equal to a certain percentage of the outstanding principal, interest, default interest and other amounts owed. Such percentage varies from 105% to 115% depending on the period in which the prepayment occurs, as set forth in the note.

The FF SPA provides FF with certain participation rights in any subsequent offering of debt or equity. Under the FF SPA, the Company may not enter into an offering of its securities with terms that would benefit an investor more than FF is benefited under the FF SPA and the agreements ancillary thereto, unless the Company offers FF those same terms. The FF SPA also grants FF certain registration rights.

The FF Warrant is a common stock purchase warrant to purchase 6,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, for value received in connection with the issuance of the note, from the date of issuance of the FF Warrant until September 30, 2023, at an exercise price of $0.206$0.007 (subject to adjustment as provided therein) per share. The warrants includeshare of common stock.

Additionally, the Company provided a call right,confession of judgment (the “Confession of Judgment”) in favor of FF for the Company,amount of the note plus fees and costs, to be filed pursuant to the extentterms and conditions of the weighted average closing priceFF SPA and the note.

The note and the shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon its conversion were offered and sold to FF in reliance upon specific exemptions from the registration requirements of United States federal and state securities laws, which include Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act, and Rule 506(b) promulgated by the SEC under the 1933 Act. Pursuant to these exemptions, FF represented to the Company under the FF SPA, among other representations, that it was an “accredited investor” as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the 1933 Act.

EMA Financial, LLC

On July 30, 2020, the Company and EMA Financial, LLC (“EMA”) entered into a securities purchase Agreement (the “EMA SPA”) by which EMA provided a sum of $68,250 to the Company, in return for a convertible note with a face amount of $75,000, and a common stock purchase warrant (the “EMA Warrant”) for 3,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The note obligates the Company to pay by October 30, 2021 a principal amount of $75,000 together with interest at a rate equal to 10% per annum, which principal exceeds $0.309the consideration by the amount of an original issue discount of $6,750. Any amount of principal or interest that is not paid by the maturity date would bear interest at the rate of 24% from the maturity date to the date such amount is paid.

EMA has the right, in its discretion, at any time, to convert any outstanding and unpaid amount of the note into shares of common stock, provided that such conversion would not result in EMA beneficially owning more than 4.99% of the Company’s then outstanding common stock. In the absence of an event of default (as defined in the note), EMA may convert at a per share forconversion price equal to $0.02, subject to a retroactive downward adjustment if the lowest traded price on each of tenthe three consecutive trading days following such conversion is lower than $0.02. Upon an event of default, the conversion price is to be adjusted downward based on a discount to market with respect to subsequent financings or a percentage of the lowest traded price during the twenty-one day period prior to the conversion, if lower than $0.02. Upon such conversion, all rights with respect to the portion of the note being so converted terminate, except for the right to receive common stock or other securities, cash or other assets as provided in the note due upon such conversion.

The Company may, with prior written notice to EMA, prepay the outstanding principal amount under the Note during the initial 180 day period after July 30, 2020 by making a payment to EMA of an amount in cash equal to a certain percentage of the outstanding principal, interest, default interest and other amounts owed. Such percentage varies from 110% to 115% depending on the period in which the prepayment occurs, as set forth in the note.

If, prior to the repayment or conversion of the note, the Company consummates a registered, qualified or unregistered primary offering of its securities for capital raising purposes with aggregate net proceeds in excess of $2,500,000, EMA will have the right, in its discretion, to demand repayment in full of any outstanding principal, interest (including default interest) under the note as of the closing date of such offering.

The EMA SPA includes, among other things: (1) an automatic adjustment to the terms of the EMA SPA and related documents to the terms of a future financing if those terms are more beneficial to an investor than the terms of the EMA SPA and related documents are to EMA, subject to limited exceptions; and (2) certain circumstances.

registration rights. In addition, any subsidiary to which the Company transfers a material amount of assets must guarantee certain obligations of the Company under the note.

In recordingThe EMA Warrant is a common stock purchase warrant to purchase 3,750,000 shares of common stock, for value received in connection with the proceedsissuance of the note, from the private placement,date of issuance of the EMA Warrant until September 30, 2023, at an exercise price of $0.007 (subject to adjustment as provided therein) per share of common stock.

The note and the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion thereof are offered and sold to EMA in reliance upon specific exemptions from the registration requirements of United States federal and state securities laws, which include Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Pursuant to these exemptions, EMA represented to the Company evaluatedunder the conversion feature withinEMA SPA, among other representations, that it was an “accredited investor” as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the promissory note1933 Act.

2014 License Agreement Extension of Time to Meet December 31, 2019 Payment Obligation

RespireRx received an extension of time to meet the $100,000 per year payment obligation that was originally due on December 31, 2019, until July 7, 2020 when the payment obligation was met by RespireRx. The next annual payment obligation due with respect to the 2014 License Agreement is due on December 31, 2020. See Note 8. Significant Agreements and determined that such embedded featureContracts – University of Illinois 2014 Exclusive License Agreement.

Compensation Forgiveness by Arnold S. Lippa and Jeff Margolis and Related Issuance of Series H Preferred Stock.

On July 13, 2020, RespireRx entered into two Exchange Agreements (each an “Exchange Agreement” and collectively, the “Exchange Agreements”) with Mr. Margolis, and Dr. Lippa (each an “Employee” and collectively, the “Employees”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreements, each Employee exchanged his right to receive certain accrued compensation from the Company in exchange for shares of Series H 2% Voting, Non-Participating, Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series H Preferred Stock”) of the Company. Mr. Margolis exchanged his right to receive $500,000 of accrued compensation for 500 shares of the Series H Preferred Stock, and Dr. Lippa exchanged his right to receive $600,000 of accrued compensation for 600 shares of the Series H Preferred Stock. The Series H Preferred Stock is indexedconvertible into units consisting of one share of common stock of the Company and a warrant exercisable into one share of common stock of the Company (such warrant having an initial exercise price of $0.007 per share).

The agreement to accept the Employees’ offers to forgive compensation and to enter into Exchange Agreements was approved by disinterested members of the Company’s Board of Directors; Mr. Margolis and Dr. Lippa recused themselves from voting. The Company’s entry into the Exchange Agreements and resulting forgiveness of compensation reduced the accrued compensation liabilities of the Company by $1,100,000.

Also, on July 13, 2020, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation, Preferences, Rights and Limitations (the “Certificate of Designation”) of its Series H Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to amend the Company’s certificate of incorporation. The filing of the Certificate of Designation was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Certificate of Designation sets forth the preferences, rights and limitations of the Series H Preferred Stock.

Entry into Equity Purchase Agreement

On July 28, 2020, RespireRx entered into an equity purchase agreement (the “EPA”) and a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with White Lion Capital, LLC (the “Investor”) pursuant to which the Investor agreed to invest up to $2,000,000 to purchase the Company’s common stock and should not be separated fromat a purchase price of 85% of the promissory note and accounted for as a derivative instrument. The Company also evaluatedlowest daily volume weighted average price of the exercise featurecommon stock for the potentially issuable warrants and deemed the instruments indexedfive trading days prior to a given closing date related to such purchase. Additionally, RespireRx issued to the Company’s common stock and subject to equity classification within the Company’s balance sheet.Investor a convertible note (the “Commitment Note”) with a face amount of $25,000.

The valueRegistration Rights Agreement was entered into as an inducement to the Investor to execute and deliver the EPA, whereby RespireRx agreed to provide certain registration rights under the 1933 Act with respect to the shares of the promissory note was estimated as of the issuance date based upon the fair value of the underlying common stock issuable upon its conversion. At the same time, the fair value of the warrants potentially issuable to the investor was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company then used the relative fair value method to allocate the proceedsInvestor pursuant to the promissory note and the potentially issuable warrants.

Based upon the allocated proceeds, the Company calculated an effective conversion price for the promissory note and then measured the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion right embedded within the promissory note.EPA. The beneficial conversion right is basedEPA terminates on the difference betweenearlier of (i) June 30, 2021, (ii) the fair valuedate on which the Investor has purchased $2,000,000 of the Company’s common stock, and(iii) the effective conversion pricedate on which the registration statement agreed to in the Registration Rights Agreement is no longer in effect, (iv) upon Investor’s material breach of the promissory note onEPA, (v) in the closing dateevent a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed with respect to RespireRx, or (vi) if a custodian is appointed for RespireRx for all or substantially all of its property or RespireRx makes a general assignment for the offering.benefit of its creditors.

The value of the beneficial conversion right of approximately $224,000Commitment Note was originally amortized as interest expense over the 15-month period until potential redemption of the promissory note, or April 15, 2011, along with capitalized offering costs incurredissued in connection with the transaction. Uponexecution of the EPA and pursuant to the terms thereof, and obligates RespireRx to pay by July 28, 2021 a principal amount of $25,000, together with a guaranteed interest payment of $2,000 representing an 8% per annum interest rate applied regardless of any payments or prepayments other than payments made by conversion of the promissory noteCommitment Note. Upon an event of default, any amount of outstanding principal or interest would bear interest at the lower of 18% or the highest rate permitted by law.

The Investor has the right, at any time after the first 180 days, to convert any outstanding and unpaid amount (including accrued interest and other fees) into shares of common stock, provided that such conversion would not result in June 2010, the unamortized balances forInvestor beneficially owning more than 9.99% of RespireRx’s then outstanding common stock. Unless an event of default has occurred, the beneficialInvestor may convert at a per share conversion right andprice equal to $0.02. Upon such conversion, all rights with respect to the capitalized offering costs were immediately amortized as interest expense.

Upon issuanceportion of the warrants resulting from conversion of the promissory note, the previously estimated relative fair value allocated to the warrants was recorded as interest expense, with an offsetting entry to additional paid-in capital.

Commitment Note 3 — Sale of AMPAKINE Assets

On March 25, 2010, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Biovail. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, Biovail acquired the Company’s interests in CX717, CX1763, CX1942 and the injectable dosage form of CX1739, as well as certain of its other AMPAKINE compounds and related intellectual propertybeing so converted terminate, except for use in the field of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease.

In connection with the transaction, Biovail paid the Company the lump sum of $9,000,000 upon the execution of the asset purchase agreement, which amount the Company recorded as revenue during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Biovail subsequently paid the Company an additional $1,000,000 upon completion of the specified transfer plan, which the Company recorded as revenue upon its receipt during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

In addition, the Company has the right to receive upcommon stock.

The Investor also has the right, at any time the Commitment Note is outstanding, to three milestone paymentsapply any outstanding principal or interest as consideration for any equity, equity-linked and/or debt securities offered by RespireRx in an aggregate amount of up to $15,000,000 plus the reimbursement of certain related expenses, each conditioned upon the occurrence of particular events relatingany public offering or private placement, subject to the clinical development of certain assets that Biovail acquired.

As partterms of the transaction, Biovail licensed backCommitment Note.

RespireRx may, with prior written notice to the Investor, prepay the entire outstanding principal amount under the Commitment Note at any time by making a payment to the Investor of an amount in cash equal to 110% of the outstanding principal, guaranteed interest amount, and any default interest or other amounts owed.

The shares of common stock to be issued and sold to the Investor pursuant to the EPA, or issuable upon conversion of the Commitment Note, and the Commitment Note are issued in reliance upon specific exemptions from the registration requirements of United States federal and state securities laws, which include Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Pursuant to these exemptions, the Investor represented to the Company certain exclusiveunder the EPA, among other representations, that it was an “accredited investor” as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the 1933 Act.

Approval of Amendment of the Amended and irrevocable rightsRestated 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan

On July 31, 2020, the Board of Directors amended the 2015 Plan to all dosage forms of CX1739, otherincrease the shares issuable under the 2015 Plan by 100,000,000, from 58,985,260 shares to 158,985,260. Other than the injectable dosage form. Biovail’s rightschange in the number of shares available under the 2015 Plan, no other changes were made to the injectable dosage form2015 Plan by this amendment. See Note 6. Stockholders’ Deficiency – Stock Options.

Stock options granted to Executive Officers and Others

On July 31, 2020, the Board of CX1739 are limited to use in the fieldDirectors of respiratory depression or vaso-occlusive crises associated with sickle cell disease. The Company is free to develop all other dosage forms of CX1739 for all uses outside of those indications. Accordingly, following the transaction with Biovail, the Company retains its rightsgranted non-qualified options to develop and commercializetwo executive officers of the majorityCompany.

RespireRx granted a non-qualified stock option to Mr. Jones to purchase 16,000,000 shares of its AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for neurological diseases and psychiatric disorders. Additionally, the Company retains its rights to develop and commercialize the AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for sleep apnea disorders.

In September 2010, Biovail merged with Valeant. As a resultcommon stock of Valeant’s merger and changes in strategic directions for the combined company, Valeant announced its intent to exit several therapeutic programs, including the respiratory depression project acquired from the Company. The Company isoptions vested or will vest, as applicable, in discussions with Valeant regarding the futurefour installments: 25% on issuance, 25% on September 30, 2020, 25% on December 31, 2020, and 25% on March 31, 2021. The options will expire on July 31, 2025. The exercise price of the projectoptions is the closing per share market price of shares of common stock of RespireRx as of the date of issuance, which was $0.0072 per share. The option contains a cashless exercise provision.

RespireRx granted non-qualified options to Richard Purcell to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company. The options vested or will vest, as applicable, in four installments: 25% on issuance, 25% on September 30, 2020, 25% on December 31, 2020, and under25% on March 31, 2020. The options will expire on July 31, 2025. The exercise price of the agreement betweenoptions is the closing per share market price of shares of Common Stock of the Company as of the date of issuance, which was $0.0072 per share. The option contains a cashless exercise provision.

On July 31, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company granted a non-qualified option exercisable into 7,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company to Kathryn MacFarlane, a member of the Board of Directors and Biovail, all contractual obligations remainadditional non-qualified options exercisable into 21,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company in place.

the aggregate to vendors, or assignees of vendors, in each case on either a discretionary basis or for services rendered. The options vested on issuance and will expire on July 31, 2025. The exercise price of the options is the closing per share market price of shares of common stock of RespireRx as of the date of issuance, which was $0.0072 per share. These options contain a cashless exercise provision.

UnitsAmendment to Timothy Jones Employment Contract and Extension Beyond Provisional Period

LOGO

On July 31, 2020, the employment agreement of Mr. Jones was amended to (i) decrease the threshold financing amount above which the Board of Directors may exercise its discretion to withhold payment to Mr. Jones of his salary and bonus and (ii) adjust bonus amounts paid without adjusting the aggregate dollar amount of these bonus amounts.

On that same date, pursuant to employment agreement, (i) Mr. Jones’s employment with the Company was no longer considered “at will” and all rights and obligations set forth in the Employment Agreement were deemed effective as of that date and (ii) Mr. Jones was granted options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock of RespireRx.

ProspectusSee “Note 8. Significant Agreements and Contracts—Employment Agreements.” Also, see See Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies – Significant Agreements and Contracts – Employment Agreements to our condensed consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2020 for more information on the employment agreement of Mr. Jones.

Exercise of Option pursuant to Option Agreement with UWMRF and Commencement of UWMRF Patent License Agreement.


On August 1, 2020, RespireRx exercised its option pursuant to its option agreement dated March 2, 2020, between RespireRx and UWM Research Foundation, an affiliate of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (“UWMRF”). Upon exercise RespireRx and UWMRF executed the UWMRF Patent License Agreement effective August 1, 2020 pursuant to which RespireRx licensed the identified intellectual property. Under the terms of the exclusive, royalty bearing UWMRF Patent License Agreement, RespireRx licensed from UWMRF, the Licensed Subject Matter which includes the patent rights, technology rights and improvements on a worldwide basis. RespireRx is responsible to pay UWMRF 25% of past patent costs twelve months after the effective date of the UWMRF Patent License Agreement and 25% twenty-four months after the effective and the balance of past patent costs thirty-six months after the effective date. As of January 14, 2020, such past patent costs totaled $60,370. RespireRx is obligated to pay annual license maintenance fees that very from year-to-year from the second anniversary date through the fifth anniversary date and the amount due on the fifth anniversary date is due each anniversary date thereafter. Additionally, RespireRx is obligated to pay UWMRF one-time milestones (i) upon the dosing of the first patient is a Phase II clinical trial, (ii) upon the dosing of the first patient in a Phase III clinical trial and (iii) upon approval by the FDA” of a NDA. RespireRx is also obligated to pay annual royalties on net sales of patented products, and other products as described and defined in the UWMRF Patent License Agreement, subject to reduction due to royalty stacking provisions. The royalty percentages are also subject to annual minimum amounts after first commercial sale of a licensed product of which annual minimums increase in two-year increments until they reach a fixed amount in year six and thereafter. UWMRF was granted stock appreciation rights providing UWMRF with the right to receive an amount equal to 4.9% of the consideration received upon the sale or assignment of one or more of the neuromodulator programs above $1 per program. The Company must provide UWMRF with an annual development plan by September 30, 2021 and each September 30th thereafter. The UWMRF Patent License Agreement will expand the Company’s neuromodulator platform which has historically included the Company’s AMPAkine program and now includes a GABAA program as well. That platform, as expanded, is now called EndeavourRx.

Conversions of Certain Convertible Notes

The table below summarizes the conversions of several convertible notes after June 30, 2020.

 Date  Principal   Interest      Total   No. Shares 
2020  converted   converted    Costs   converted   issued 
Convertible note issued in November 2019                
 July 1 $20,500  $1,348  $-  $21,848   9,103,313 
 July 7 $10,000  $674   -  $10,674   4,447,488 
Total  $30,500  $2,022  $-  $32,522   13,550,801 

Exercises of Certain Warrants on a Cashless Basis

The table below summarizes the exercise of warrants after June 30, 2020.

Warrant exercises 

Date

2020

 Number of warrants
exercised on a cashless basis
  Number of shares issued 
        
Warrants Associated With August 2019 Convertible Note July 1  10,063,627   9,490,000 
  July 7  10,604,454   10,000,000 
  July 10  10,604,454   10,000,000 
  July 23  2,997,219   2,826,861 
           
Warrants Associated With October 2019 Convertible Note July 31  13,300,000   12,641,650 
  August 7  14,000,000   13,307,000 
  August 12  14,000,000   13,307,000 
           
Total    75,569,754   71,572,511 

Reimbursement of Advances made by Officers to the Company

Advances to the Company, included in Notes payable to officers in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2020, made by Jeff E. Margolis, were repaid, in part, such repayment being $4,000.

F-73

115,000,000 Shares of Common Stock

RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

, 2020

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 

Item 13.Other Expenses of Issuance and DistributionDistribution.

The following table sets forth allthe costs and expenses other than underwriting discounts and commissions, to be paidpayable by RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”) in connection with the sale of the securitiesits Common Stock being registered hereunder, all of which will be paid by us.registered. All of the amounts shown are estimates, except for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee.fee and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) filing fee, if applicable.

 

SEC registration fee

  $348.30  

Printing fees and expenses

  $—  

Legal fees and expenses

  $—  

Accounting fees and expenses

  $—  

Miscellaneous expenses

  $—  

Total

  $—  
     

*To be filed by amendment.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee $ 63 
Accounting fees and expenses $10,000 
Legal fees and expenses $ 135,000 
Miscellaneous $4,937 
Total $150,000 

 

Item 14.Indemnification of Directors and OfficersOfficers.

Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law or the DGCL, enables(the “DGCL”), allows a corporation to provide in its original certificate of incorporation or an amendment thereto to eliminate or limitthat a director of the personal liability of a directorcorporation will not be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of the director’s fiduciary duty as a director, except where the director breached the duty of loyalty, failed to act in good faith, engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated a law, authorized the payment of a dividend or approved a stock repurchase in violation of Delaware corporate law or obtained an improper personal benefit. Section 174 of the DGCL provides, among other things, that a director, who willfully or negligently approves of an unlawful payment of dividends or an unlawful stock purchase or redemption, may be held jointly and severally liable for such actions. A director who was either absent when the unlawful actions were approved or dissented at the time may avoid liability by causing his or her dissent to such actions to be entered in the books containing the minutes of the meetings of the board of directors at the time such action occurred or immediately after such absent director receives notice of the unlawful acts.

Accordingly, our Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended to date, our “Certificate of Incorporation”) includes a provision that eliminates the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporationCompany or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) pursuant tounder Section 174 of the DGCL, (providing for liability of directors for unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock purchases or redemptions) or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. These provisions eliminate the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages arising out of any violation by a director of his fiduciary duty of due care, but do not affect a director’s liabilities under the federal securities laws or the recovery of damages by third parties.

Section 145(a)145 of the DGCL empowersprovides, among other things, that a Delaware corporation tomay indemnify any present or former director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or any individual who served or is serving at the corporation’s request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another organization,person who was, or is a party or is threatened to be made, a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of thesuch corporation), againstby reason of the fact that such person is or was an officer, director, employee or agent of such corporation or is or was serving at the request of such corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by thesuch person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, provided that such director, officer, employee or agentperson acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, provided further that such director, officer, employee or agent had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful.

Section 145(b) of the DGCL empowers aillegal. A Delaware corporation tomay indemnify any presentpersons who were or former director, officer, employee or agent or the corporation, or any individual who served or is serving at the corporation’s request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, who was or is a party or is threatened to be madeare a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person acted in anyis or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the capacities set forth above, againstanother corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by thesuch person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit, provided that such director, officer, employee or agentperson acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, of the corporation, exceptprovided further that no indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which suchis permitted without judicial approval if the officer, director, officer, employee or agent shall have beenis adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancerycorporation. Where an officer or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the circumstances of the case, such director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.

II-1


Section 145 of the DGCL further provides that (i) to the extent a present or former director or officer has been successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action suit or proceeding referred to in subsections (a) and (b) of Section 145 ofabove, the DGCL,corporation must indemnify him against the expenses which such officer or in the defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he or she shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys’ fees)director has actually and reasonably incurredincurred.

II-1

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by him or her in connection therewith; (ii) the DGCL.

The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided for, by, or granted pursuant to, Section 145 of the DGCLrights set forth above shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights toright which the persons seeking indemnificationan indemnified person may be entitled; and (iii) thehave or hereafter acquire under any statute, provision of our Certificate of Incorporation, our By-Laws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.

Section 145 further authorizes a corporation is empowered to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of a presentany person who is or formerwas a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation or any individual who is or was serving at the corporation’s request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or employeeagent of another organization,corporation or enterprise, against any liability asserted against him or her orand incurred by him or her in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation would otherwise have the power to indemnify him or her against such liabilities under Section 145145.

We maintain standard policies of the DGCL.

As permitted by the DGCL, our second restated certificate of incorporation eliminates the liability ofinsurance that provide coverage (1) to our directors to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent otherwise prohibited by the DGCL.

Our second restated certificate of incorporation provides that we will indemnify each person who was or isand officers against losses arising from claims made a party to any proceeding by reason of the factbreach of duty or other wrongful act and (2) to us with respect to indemnification payments that such person is or was our director or officer against all expense, liability and loss reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewithwe may make to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL.

Our second restated certificate of incorporation also gives us the ability to enter into indemnification agreements with each of oursuch directors and officers. We have entered into such indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements provide for the indemnification of our directors and executive officers against any and all expenses, judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement, to the fullest extent permitted by law.

 

Item 15.Recent Sales of Unregistered SecuritiesSecurities.

Convertible Promissory Note Transaction

In January 2010, we completedDuring the past three years, the Company made the following sales of unregistered securities:

On September 30, 2020, the Company entered into Exchange Agreements with Mr. Margolis, Dr. Lippa, Mr. Jones and two vendors, one of which is considered a private placementrelated party, that being Marc M. Radin, PC whereby each of a convertible promissory noteMr. Margolis, Dr. Lippa and Mr. Jones forgave $150,000, $100,000 and $28,218 of accrued compensation, respectively, and, in the principal amountcase of $1,500,000Marc M. Radin, PC, $135,659.48 of accounts payable was settled, with a single accredited institutional investor, Samyang Optics Co., Ltd. of Korea, or Samyang. The promissory note accrued simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum150, 100, 28.218 and was convertible into unregistered135.65948 shares of our common stock at Samyang’s election at any time on or after April 15, 2010 and on or before the January 15, 2011 maturity date.

In June 2010, the promissory note and the related accrued interest were converted by Samyang into a total of 10,445,579 unregistered shares of our common stock at an effective conversion price of $0.147 per share.

The number of common shares issuable upon conversion of the promissory note was based upon the greater of: (i) $0.134 per share or (ii) an amount representing a 15% discount to the five-day volume weighted average closing price of our common stock immediately prior to the conversion date.

In connection with the conversion of the promissory note, we were obligated to issue to Samyang two-year warrants to purchase up to 4,081,633 additional unregistered shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.206 per share. The warrants include a call right, in our favor, to the extent the weighted average closing price of our common stock exceeds $0.309 per share for each of ten consecutive trading days, subject to certain circumstances.

Series F ConvertibleH Preferred Stock, Transaction

In July 2009, we issued 4,029respectively. Mr. Margolis and Dr. Lippa transferred such shares of our newly designated Series F Convertible Preferredto family trusts, which converted the shares to Common Stock and warrants to purchase upCommon Stock. Mr. Jones converted his Series H Preferred Stock to an aggregateCommon Stock and warrants to purchase Common Stock. Marc M. Radin PC designated Marc M. Radin individually to be the recipient of 6,060,470 sharesits Series H Preferred Stock. Mr. Radin converted his Series H Preferred Stock to Common Stock and warrants to purchase Common Stock. For a more detailed description of our common stockthe Series H Preferred Stock issuances and conversion, see the section entitled “Prospectus Summary” in this prospectus. In addition, on september 30, 2020, $105,450 of accounts payable due to the second vendor, not considered a private placement to a single accredited investor (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act). Therelated party, was settled with 105,450 shares of Series F ConvertibleH Prefered Stock issued to two designers of such vendor, Jeffrey Joseph King and the Revocable Blind Living Trust of Breanna Maree Keller - Flauigan, which shares of Series H Preferred Stock withwere then converted to Common Stock and warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock.

On July 30, 2020, the Company issued to EMA Financial, LLC (“EMA”) a stated valuepromissory note in the amount of $1,000 per share, were$75,000 convertible into shares of common stock atCommon Stock and a pricewarrant exercisable into 3,750,000 shares of $0.3324 per shareCommon Stock, in return for a loan from EMA of $68,250.

On July 28, 2020, the Company entered into an equity purchase agreement with White Lion Capital, LLC (“the Selling Stockholder”) under which the Selling Stockholder agreed to invest up to $2,000,000 to purchase Common Stock subject to a put right held by the Company. In consideration for the Selling Stockholder entering into the equity purchase agreement, the Company issued to the Selling Stockholder a promissory note in the amount of $25,000 convertible into Common Stock.

On July 13, 2020, the Company entered into exchange agreements with each of Dr. Arnold S. Lippa and were fully-convertedJeff E. Margolis. Pursuant to the exchange agreement with Jeff E. Margolis, his right to receive $500,000 of accrued compensation was exchanged for 500 shares of Series H 2% Voting, Non-Participating, Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series H Preferred Stock”). Pursuant to the exchange agreement with Dr. Arnold S. Lippa, his right to receive $600,000 of accrued compensation was exchanged for 600 shares of Series H Preferred Stock. See “Description of Securities” within this prospectus for further information on Series H Preferred Stock.

On July 2, 2020, the Company issued to FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund LLC (“FirstFire”) a promissory note in the amount of $137,500 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 6,875,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from FirstFire of $125,000.

II-2

On June 7, 2020, the Company issued to Power Up a promissory note in the amount of $43,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from Power Up in the same amount.

On April 15, 2020, the Company issued to Power Up Lending Group Ltd. (“Power Up”) a promissory note in the amount of $53,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from Power Up in the same amount.

On March 22, 2020, the Company issued to Dr. Lippa and Mr. Margolis an aggregate of 12,120,9389,000,000 shares of common stock asCommon Stock, and in return each forgave $153,000 of September 30, 2009. The resaleaccrued compensation for an aggregate of $306,000 of accrued compensation.

On March 21, 2020, the Company entered into five separately negotiated exchange agreements with Todd Binder, John Safranek, Brian Frenzel, Dariusz Nasiek and Jeffrey Harvey, and on March 22, 2020, these parties exchanged an aggregate of $255,786.37 principal amount and accrued interest with respect to convertible promissory notes held by them in return for an aggregate of 17,052,424 shares of common stock underlyingCommon Stock.

On November 4, 2019, the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock was registered pursuantCompany issued to Odyssey Funding, LLC (“Odyssey”) a registration on Form S-3 (No. 333-161143) that the SEC declared effective on August 20, 2009. The related warrants have an exercise price of $0.2699 per share and are exercisable on or after January 31, 2010 and on or before January 31, 2013. The warrants are subject to a call provision that permits us to cancel the warrants (unless earlier exercise by the holder)promissory note in the event the volume weighted average priceamount of our common stock exceeds $0.5398$170,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock, in return for a periodloan from Odyssey of 20 consecutive trading days, the average daily volume of our common stock during such 20 trading day period exceeds $100,000 per trading day and certain other conditions are satisfied. The gross proceeds of the offering were $4,029,000, of which $2,029,000 was placed into escrow at the closing and subsequently paid to the investor upon conversion of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock.

$156,400.

 

II-2On October 22, 2019, the Company issued to EMA a promissory note in the amount of $60,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 175,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from EMA of $58,250.


Additionally, weOn August 27, 2019, the Company issued unregisteredto FirstFire a promissory note in the amount of $55,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 7,500 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from FirstFire of $50,000.

On May 17, 2019, the Company issued to Crown Bridge Partners, LLC (“Crown”) a promissory note in the amount of $150,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 42,372 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from Crown of $135,000.

On April 24, 2019, the Company issued to Power Up a promissory note in the amount of $58,500 convertible into shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from Power Up in the same amount.

On February 27, 2019, the Company issued to Dariusz and Sara Nasiek a promissory note in the amount of $50,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 50,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from them in the same amount.

On February 27, 2019, the Company issued to Brian Frenzel a promissory note in the amount of $20,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 20,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from them in the same amount.

On January 2, 2019, the Company issued to Stephen Safranek a promissory note in the amount of $10,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 10,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from him of $10,000.

On March 6, 2019, the Company issued to Jeffrey Harvey a promissory note in the amount of $10,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 10,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from him of $10,000.

On March 14, 2019, the Company issued to Dariusz and Sara Nasiek a promissory note in the amount of $20,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 20,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from them of $10,000.

On December 7, 2018, the Company issued to Jeffrey Harvey a promissory note in the amount of $10,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 10,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from him in the same amount.

On December 6, 2018, the Company issued to John Safranek a promissory note in the amount of $45,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 45,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from him in the same amount.

II-3

On December 31, 2018, the Company issued to Stephen Safranek a promissory note in the amount of $25,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock and a warrant exercisable into 25,000 shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from him in the same amount.

On September 12, 2018, the Company issued to Dr. Lippa 47,620 units comprised of 47,260 shares of Common Stock and 47,620 warrants to purchase upone share of Common Stock, and to Jeffrey B. Harvey, Marc M. Radin, Alden H. Wolfe, Damarys Alvarez, Stephen Safranek, Williams Family Trust UA Dec 4, 2000, The David Drew Neer MD JD Trust UA Aug 11, 2006 Arash Nikkar & Edie Nicole Visco JT, and Frank R Golden & Sharon Golden Fam Tr UA Sept 23 2016, none of which were officers or directors of the Company, 191,190 additional units each consisting of (i) one share of Common Stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase an additional share of Common Stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $250,750 of which $200,750 was paid in cash and $50,000 was the conversion of a promissory note in the amount of $50,000 issued by the Company to Dr. Lippa.

On May 31, 2018, the Company entered into four separately negotiated exchange agreements with Eric Sichel, Hugh Bases, Richard Marcus and Barton Asset Management LLC, none of which were officers or directors of the Company, by which these parties exchanged an aggregate of 606,047 shares of our common stock$169,715 principal amount and accrued interest with respect to the placement agentconvertible promissory notes held by them in return for the transaction, Rodman & Renshaw, LLC. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.3656 per share, are exercisable on or after January 31, 2010 and on or before January 31, 2013, and contain the same call rights as the warrants issued to the investor.

0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock Transaction

In connection with our April 2009 registered issuance of our newly designated 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants, we also issued unregistered warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 433,824226,288 shares of our common stockCommon Stock.

On April 9, 2018, the Company issued to Dr. Lippa a promissory note in the placement agentamount of $50,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from Dr. Lippa in the transaction, Rodman & Renshaw, LLC. These warrants have an exercise pricesame amount.

On April 9, 2018, the Company issued to James Manuso a promissory note in the amount of $0.26 per share and are exercisable on or after October 17, 2009 and on or before October 17, 2012.$50,000 convertible into shares of Common Stock, in return for a loan from James Manuso in the same amount.

The issuance

For all of the foregoing securitiestransactions, we relied on exemptions from registration set forth in each of the transactions described above was made in reliance upon the exemption from the registration provisionsSection 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, set forth in Section 4(2) thereof as a transaction by an issuer not involvingwithout the use of any public offering. The respective transaction documents contain representationsgeneral solicitations or advertising to support our reasonable belief that each investor is anmarket or otherwise offer the securities for sale and all participants were “accredited investor”investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D as promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act, and that such investor is acquiring such securities for investment and not with a view to the distribution thereof. At the time of their issuance, the securities described above were deemed to be restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act and such securities (and shares issued upon exercise of the unregistered warrants will) bear legends to that effect.Act.

II-4

 

Item 16.Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesSchedules.

 

(a)

(a) Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

 1.1 Form of Placement Agency Agreement to be entered into by the Company and the Placement Agent.**
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 10, 2012, by and among Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pier Acquisition Corp. and Pier Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 1.2 Form of the Purchase Agreement to be entered into by the Company and the purchasers in the offering.**
3.1 Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated May 19, 2010, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 24, 2010.
 3.2 
3.2Certificate of Amendment of the (Second Restated) Certificate of Incorporation of Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
3.3Second Certificate of Amendment of the (Second Restated) Certificate of Incorporation of Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
3.4Third Certificate of Amendment of the Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.
3.5Fourth Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.
3.6By-Laws of the Company, as adopted March 4, 1987, and amended on October 8, 1996, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed October 15, 1996.
 3.5 
3.7Certificate of Amendment of By-Laws of the Company incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed November 15, 2007.
 4.1 Rights Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2002, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, which includes as Exhibit A thereto a form of
3.8Certificate of Designation, for thePreferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Junior ParticipatingG 1.5% Convertible Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B thereto the Form of Rights Certificate and as Exhibit C thereto a Summary of Terms of Stockholder Rights Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed May 26, 2010.
Stock.
 4.2 Placement Agency Agreement, dated January 16, 2007, by and between Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC, Form of Subscription Agreement and Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibits 1.1, 1.2 and 4.1, respectively, to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2007.

II-3


Exhibit
Number
3.9

Certificate of Designation, Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series H 2% Voting, Non-Participating, Convertible Preferred Stock.
3.10 

DescriptionAmendment to Certificate of Designation, Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series H 2% Voting, Non-Participating, Convertible Preferred Stock.

  4.3 
4.1Placement Agency Agreement, dated August 24, 2007, by and between Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and JMP Securities LLC and Rodman and Renshaw, LLC, Form of Subscription Agreement and Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibits 1.1, 1.2 and 4.1, respectively, to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed August 27, 2007.
 4.4 
4.2Placement Agency Agreement, dated April 13, 2009, by and between the Company and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, Form of Securities Purchase Agreement and Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 1.1, 1.2 and 4.1, respectively, to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 17, 2009.
Company.
 4.5 Form of Warrant.**
  5.15.1* Opinion of Stradling Yocca CarlsonFaegre Drinker Biddle & Rauth, a Professional Corporation.Reath LLP.
10.3 Consulting Agreement, dated as October 30, 1987, between the Company and Gary S. Lynch, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-28284, effective on July 18, 1989.*
10.1910.1† License Agreement dated March 27, 1991 between the Company and the Regents of the University of California, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Amendment on Form 8 filed November 27, 1991 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed September 30, 1991. (Portions of this Exhibit are omitted and were filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
10.31 License Agreement dated June 25, 1993, as amended, between the Company and the Regents of the University of California, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed February 12, 2004. (Portions of this exhibit are omitted and were filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
10.4410.2† Lease Agreement, dated January 31, 1994, for the Company’s facilities in Irvine, California, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed May 16, 1994.
10.60Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed on November 14, 2002.*
10.65Amendment No. 1 to the Lease Agreement for the Company’s facilities in Irvine, California, dated February 1, 1999, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed September 28, 1999.
10.67Collaborative Research, Joint Clinical Research and Licensing Agreements with Les Laboratoires Servier dated October 13, 2000, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed November 14, 2000. (Portions of this Exhibit were omitted and filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Act of 1934).
10.69Employment agreement dated May 17, 2000, between the Company and James H. Coleman, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-QSB filed February 12, 2001.*
10.70Severance agreement dated October 26, 2000, between the Company and Maria S. Messinger, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed February 12, 2001.*

II-4


Exhibit
Number

Description

10.73Amendment dated October 3, 2002 to the Collaboration Research Agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier dated October 13, 2000, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed October 15, 2002.
10.74Employment agreement dated October 29, 2002 between the Company and Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed on November 14, 2002.*
10.76First Amendment dated August 8, 2003 to the employment agreement between the Company and Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed September 19, 2003.*
10.77Amendment dated December 16, 2003 to the Collaboration Research Agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier dated October 13, 2000, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed February 12, 2004. (Portions of this Exhibit are omitted and were filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
10.79Amendment No. 2 to the Lease Agreement for the Company’s facilities in Irvine, California, dated March 9, 2004, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on September 27, 2004.
10.80Form of Incentive/Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on September 27, 2004.*
10.81Form of Restricted Stock Award under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on September 27, 2004.*
10.82Amendment dated January 1, 2004 to the employment agreement dated May 17, 2000 between the Company and James H. Coleman, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on September 27, 2004.*
10.86Second Amendment dated November 10, 2004 to the employment agreement dated October 29, 2002 between the Company and Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 15, 2004.*
10.88Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Stock Option Agreement under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 21, 2005.*
10.89Stock Ownership Policy for the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers as adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors on December 16, 2004, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 21, 2005.*
10.90Third Amendment dated August 13, 2005 to the employment agreement dated October 29, 2002 between the Company and Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2005.*

II-5


Exhibit
Number

Description

10.92Employment letter of agreement dated January 9, 2006 between the Company and Mark Varney, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2006.*
10.93Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement dated January 30, 2006 between the Company and Mark Varney, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2006.*
10.94Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed May 11, 2006.*
10.96Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Stock Option Agreement under the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2006.*Plan.
10.97 
10.3†Form of Incentive/Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Company’s 2006 Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2006.*Incentive Plan.

II-5

10.9810.4† Amendment No. 3, dated April 1, 2006, to the Lease Agreement for the Company’s facilities in Irvine, California, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2006.
10.100Negative Equity Agreement dated February 1, 2007 between the Company and Mark A. Varney, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2007.*
10.101Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibitdated May 9, 2007.
10.5†Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 2007.*
10.102Amendment to the Exclusive License Agreement between the Company and The Regents of the University of California, dated2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of June 1, 2007, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit5, 2009.
10.6†Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2007.2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 19, 2010.
10.105 
10.7Patent License Agreement between the Company and the University of Alberta, dated as of May 9, 2007, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 17, 2008 (Portions of this Exhibit are omitted and were filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).2007.
10.107 Severance Agreement dated May 2, 2008, between the Company and Steven A. Johnson, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 8, 2008.*
10.10810.8 Amendment No. 4, dated June 6, 2008, to the Lease Agreement for the Company’s facilities in Irvine, California, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed June 10, 2008.
10.109Fourth Amendment, dated July 11, 2008, to the employment agreement dated October 29, 2002 between the Company and Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same Numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed July 17, 2008.*

II-6


Exhibit
Number

Description

10.110Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2008, between the Company and James H. Coleman, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2008.*
10.111Amendment No. 1 Severance Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2008, between the Company and Maria S. Messinger, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2008.*
10.112Employment Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2008, between the Company and Mark A. Varney, Ph.D., incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2008.*
10.113Form of Retention Bonus Agreement, dated March 13, 2009, between the Company and each of its executive officers, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 19, 2009.*
10.114Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 29, 2009, by and between the Company and the investor,Investors named therein.
10.9Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 15, 2011, by and between the Company and Biovail Laboratories International SRL.
10.10Patent Assignment and Option and Amended and Restated Agreement, dated June 10, 2011, between the Company and Les Laboratoires Servier.
10.11Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, by and between the Company and Samyang Optics Co., Ltd., including a form of Registration Rights AgreementConvertible Promissory Note attached as Exhibit BA thereto and a form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant attached as Exhibit C thereto, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 29, 2009.B thereto.
10.115 Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of June 5, 2009, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2009.*
10.11610.12 AssetSecurities Purchase Agreement, dated March 25, 2010,October 20, 2011, by and between the Company and Biovail Laboratories International SRL, incorporated by reference toSamyang Value Partners Co., Ltd., including the same numberedCommon Stock Purchase Warrant attached as Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 17, 2010. (Portions of this Exhibit are omitted and were filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)A thereto.
10.117 License
10.13Securities Purchase Agreement, dated MarchJune 25, 2010,2012, by and between the Company and Biovail Laboratories International SRL, incorporatedSamyang Optics Co., Ltd., including a form of Secured Promissory Note attached as Exhibit A thereto, a form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant attached as Exhibit B thereto, and a form of Patent Security Agreement attached as Exhibit C thereto.
10.14Form of Securities Purchase Agreement.
10.15†Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2014 Equity, Equity-Linked and Equity Derivative Incentive Plan, established March 14, 2014.
10.16Exclusive License Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2014, by reference toand between the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 17, 2010. (PortionsBoard of this Exhibit are omitted and were filed separately with the SecretaryTrustees of the Commission pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2University of Illinois, a body corporate and politic of the Securities Exchange ActState of 1934.)Illinois, and Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
10.118 Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 24, 2010.*
10.11910.17 Sixth Amendment dated August 12, 2010 to the employment agreementStandard Agreement for Submitting Compounds for Preclinical Pharmacological, Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Evaluation, dated October 29, 200219, 2015, by and between the National Institute on Drug Abuse (hereinafter referred to as “NIDA”), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH); and Cortex Pharmaceuticals.
10.18†Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement.
10.19†Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement.
10.20†Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
10.21Release Agreement, dated September 2, 2014, between the Company and Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D., incorporatedthe Institute for the Study of Aging Inc.

II-6

10.22Form of Convertible Note and Warrant Agreement, including a form of 10% Convertible Note due September 15, 2012 attached as Exhibit A thereto and a Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock attached as Exhibit B thereto.
10.23Demand Promissory Note, dated June 16, 2015, held by referenceArnold S. Lippa on behalf of the Company.
10.24Form of Demand Promissory Note.
10.25Form of Warrant to the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Purchase Common Stock.
10.26†2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan, dated June 30, 2015.
10.27†Amended and Restated RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan.
10.28†First Amendment of Amended and Restated RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan.
10.29Form 8-K filedof Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement.
10.30†Employment Agreement, dated August 18, 2010.*
10.120Amendment to the License Agreement2015, between the Company and The RegentsJames S. J. Manuso.
10.31†Employment Agreement, dated August 18, 2015, between the Company and Arnold S. Lippa.
10.32†Employment Agreement, dated August 18, 2015, between the Company and Robert N. Weingarten.*
10.33†Employment Agreement, dated August 18, 2015, between the Company and Jeff E. Margolis.
10.34Form of Second Amended and Restated Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement.
10.35Form of Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, including a Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock attached as Exhibit A thereto.
10.36Form of Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, including a Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock attached as Exhibit A thereto.
10.37Form of Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, including a Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock attached as Exhibit A thereto.
10.38Form of Exchange Agreement, including a Form of New Warrant attached as Exhibit A thereto.
10.39Form of Exchange Agreement.
10.40Form of Purchase Agreement (including a Form of Warrant).
10.41Form of Purchase Agreement (including a Form of Warrant)
10.42†Amendment No. One of the UniversityEmployment Agreement of California,Jeff E. Margolis, effective July 1, 2017.
10.43Form of Purchase Agreement (including a Form of Warrant)

II-7

10.44Form of Purchase Agreement (including a Form of Warrant)
10.45†Second Amendment of the Amended and Restated RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan
10.46Form of Demand Promissory Note.
10.47Form of Note Exchange Agreement.
10.48Form of Purchase Agreement (including a Form of Warrant).
10.49Development and Supply Agreement, dated September 4, 2018.
10.50Form of Convertible Promissory Note (including a Form of Warrant).
10.51Form of Convertible Promissory Note (including the Form of Warrant).
10.52Securities Purchase Agreement, dated April 24, 2019, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Power Up Lending Group Ltd.
10.53Convertible Promissory Note, dated April 24, 2019.
10.54Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 17, 2019, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Crown Bridge Partners, LLC.
10.55Convertible Promissory Note, dated May 17, 2019.
10.56Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated May 17, 2019.
10.57Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 19, 2019, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC.
10.58Convertible Promissory Note, dated August 19, 2019.
10.59Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated August 19, 2019.
10.60Settlement Agreement and Release, dated August 21, 2019, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Salamandra, LLC.
10.61Securities Purchase Agreement, dated October 22, 2019, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and EMA Financial, LLC.
10.6210% Convertible Note, dated October 22, 2019.
10.63Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated October 22, 2019.
10.64Securities Purchase Agreement, dated November 4, 2019, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Odyssey Funding, LLC.
10.65RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. 10% Convertible Redeemable Note due November 4, 2020, dated November 4, 2019.
10.66First Amendment to Settlement Agreement and Release, dated as of December 16, 2019, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Salamandra, LLC.

II-8

10.67+Company Option Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2020, by and between the UWM Research Foundation, Inc. and RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.
10.68Form of Exchange Agreement.
10.69Securities Purchase Agreement, dated April 15, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Power Up Lending Group Ltd.
10.70Convertible Promissory Note, dated April 15, 2020, in favor of Power Up Lending Group Ltd.
10.71Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 7, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Power Up Lending Group Ltd.
10.72Convertible Promissory Note, dated June 7, 2020, in favor of Power Up Lending Group Ltd.
10.73Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 2, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC.
10.74Convertible Promissory Note, dated July 2, 2020, in favor of FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC.
10.75Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated July 2, 2020, in favor of FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC.
10.76Exchange Agreement, dated July 13, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Jeff Eliot Margolis.
10.77Exchange Agreement, dated July 13, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Arnold S. Lippa.
10.78†Employment Agreement, dated May 6, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.and Timothy Jones.
��
10.79†Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement of Timothy Jones, effective July 31, 2020.
10.80Fourth Amendment of Amended and Restated RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan.
10.81Fifth Amendment of Amended and Restated RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2015 Stock and Stock Option Plan.
10.82Equity Purchase Agreement, dated July 28, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and White Lion Capital, LLC.
10.83Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 28, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and White Lion Capital, LLC.
10.848% Fixed Promissory Note, dated July 28, 2020, in favor of White Lion Capital, LLC.
10.85Patent License Agreement, dated as of August 24, 2010, incorporated1, 2020, by reference toand between the same numbered Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 30, 2010.University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Research Foundation, Inc. and RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc..
21 
10.86Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 30, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and EMA Financial, LLC.
10.8710% Convertible Note, dated July 30, 2020, in favor of EMA Financial, LLC.

10.88Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated July 30, 2020, in favor of EMA Financial, LLC.
10.89

Exchange Agreement, dated September 30, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Timothy Jones.

10.90Exchange Agreement, dated September 30, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Jeff Eliot Margolis.
10.91Exchange Agreement, dated September 30, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Arnold S. Lippa.
10.92Exchange Agreement, dated September 30, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Marc Radin PC.
10.93Exchange Agreement, dated September 30, 2020, between RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Patent Network Law Group.
10.94Amendment No. 1 to 8% Fixed Promissory Note, dated September 30, 2020.

II-9

21Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

II-7


Exhibit
Number

 

Description

23.1 Consent of Haskell & White LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
23.223.2* Consent of Stradling Yocca CarlsonFaegre Drinker Biddle & RauthReath LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)
24 
24Power of Attorney (included as part of the signature page of this registration statementRegistration Statement on Form S-1).

101.INSXBRL Instance Document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
*To be filed by amendment.
Each of these Exhibits constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.
**+ToCertain information was omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K because it is both not material and would be filed by amendment.competitively harmful if publicly disclosed. When filing the document with the Current Report on Form 8-K, the Company undertook to furnish, supplementally, a copy of the unredacted exhibit to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

(b)Financial Statement SchedulesII-10

All schedules have been omitted because the information required to be presented in them is not applicable or is shown in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

 

Item 17.Undertakings.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

1. For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

2. For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

undertakes:

 

(1)To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
(i)To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;
(ii)To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement;
(iii)To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this registration statement or any material change to such information in this registration statement;
provided, however, that no post-effective amendment will be made pursuant to this undertaking if the information set forth in this undertaking to be included in a post-effective amendment is contained in reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference in this registration statement.
(2)That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered herein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3)To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(4)Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(5)Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

II-8

II-11


(6)That, in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
(i)Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 ;
(ii)Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii)The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv)Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

II-12

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, of 1933, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Irvine, State of California,Glen Rock, New Jersey, on the 1913th day of January, 2011.October, 2020.

 

RESPIRERX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
CORTEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
By:/s/ Timothy Jones
 

/s/ Maria S. MessingerTimothy Jones

President, Chief FinancialExecutive Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Director

POWER OF ATTORNEYPower of Attorney

We, the undersigned directors

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and officers of Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., do hereby constituteappoints Timothy Jones and appoint Roger G. Stoll Ph.D., Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.Jeff E. Margolis, and Maria S. Messinger, or anyeach of them ouracting individually, as his or her true and lawful attorneysattorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of each to doact alone, with full powers of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all actscapacities, to sign the Registration Statement filed herewith and things in our name and behalf in our capacities as directors and officers and to execute any and all instruments for usamendments to said Registration Statement (including post-effective amendments and any related registration statements thereto filed pursuant to Rule 461 and otherwise), and file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in our names inconnection therewith, with the capacities indicated below, whichSEC, granting unto said attorneysattorneys-in-fact and agents, or anywith full power of them, may deem necessary or advisableeach to enable said corporation to comply with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any rules, regulations, and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with this registration statement, including specifically, but without limitation,act alone, full power and authority to sign for us or any of us in our namesdo and in the capacities indicated below, anyperform each and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this registration statement, or any related registration statement that isevery act and thing requisite and necessary to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933,done in connection therewith, as amended;fully for all intents and wepurposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifyratifying and confirmconfirming all that the said attorneysattorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, shallhis or her or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, of 1933, as amended, this registration statementRegistration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

/s/ Mark A. Varney

 
/s/ Timothy JonesPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director January 19, 2011October 13, 2020
Mark A. Varney, Ph.D.Timothy Jones (Principal Executive Officer) 

/s/ Maria S. Messinger

 
/s/ Arnold S. Lippa, Ph.D.Chief Scientific Officer, Director and Executive Chairman ofOctober 13, 2020
Arnold S. Lippa Ph.D.the Board
/s/ Jeff E. MargolisSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, January 19, 2011October 13, 2020
Maria S. MessingerJeff E. Margolis (Principal FinancialTreasurer and Accounting Officer)Director 

/s/ Roger G. Stoll

 Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors January 19, 2011
Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D./s/ Kathryn MacFarlane Director October 13, 2020

/s/ Robert F. Allnutt

Kathryn MacFarlane
 Director January 19, 2011

Robert F. Allnutt 

/s/ John F. Benedik

DirectorJanuary 19, 2011
John F. Benedik

/s/ Charles J. Casamento

DirectorJanuary 19, 2011
Charles J. Casamento

/s/ Carl W. Cotman

DirectorJanuary 19, 2011
Carl W. Cotman, Ph.D.

/s/ Peter F. Drake

DirectorJanuary 19, 2011
Peter F. Drake, Ph.D.

/s/ M. Ross Johnson

DirectorJanuary 19, 2011
M. Ross Johnson, Ph.D.

II-9