Table of Contents

​

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25,August 4, 2022

Registration No. 333-333-264474

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the shares of common stock offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. Neither we nor the placement agent have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus we have prepared. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the securities offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date. You should also read this prospectus together with the additional information described under “Additional Information.”

Unless the context otherwise requires, we use the terms “we,” “us,” “the Company,” “Mill City Ventures III,” or “our” to refer to Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.

​

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and include statements regarding, among other things, our projected revenue growth and profitability, our growth strategies and opportunity, anticipated trends in our market and our anticipated needs for working capital. They are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plans,” “potential,” “projects,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expects,” “management believes,” “we believe,” “we intend” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These statements may be found under the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business,” as well as in this prospectus generally. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective products, market acceptance, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, and the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings and financial results.

Examples of forward-looking statements in this prospectus include, but are not limited to, our expectations regarding our business strategy, business prospects, operating results, operating expenses, working capital, liquidity and capital expenditure requirements. Important assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements include, among others, assumptions regarding demand for our products, the cost, terms and availability of components, pricing levels, the timing and cost of capital expenditures, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. These statements are based on our management’s expectations, beliefs and assumptions concerning future events affecting us, which in turn are based on currently available information. These assumptions could prove inaccurate. Although we believe that the estimates and projections reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, our expectations may prove to be incorrect.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should any of the assumptions made by our management prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we do not undertake to update or revise any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for us to predict all of those risks, nor can we assess the impact of all of those risks on our business or the extent to which any factor may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. The forward-looking statements in this prospectus are based on assumptions management believes are reasonable. However, due to the uncertainties associated with forward-looking statements, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and unless required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to publicly update any of them in light of new information, future events, or otherwise.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. While this summary highlights what we consider to be important information about us, you should carefully read this entire prospectus before investing in shares of our common stock, especially the risks and other information we discuss under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” and our financial statements and related notes beginning on page F-1. Our fiscal year end is December 31 and our fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are sometimes referred to herein as fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively. Some of the statements made in this prospectus discuss future events and developments, including our future strategy and our ability to generate revenue, income and cash flow. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”. Unless otherwise indicated or the context requires otherwise, the words “we,” “us,” “our”, the “Company” or “our Company” or “Mill City Ventures III” refer to Mill City Ventures III Ltd., a Minnesota corporation.

Our Company

Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. is a Minnesota corporation incorporated in January 2006. In 2013, we elected to become a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). We operated as a BDC until we withdrew our BDC election on December 27, 2019. Since 2019, we have engaged in the business of providing short-term specialty finance solutions primarily to private businesses, micro- and small-cap public companies and high-net-worth individuals. To avoid again becoming subject to regulation under the 1940 Act, we generally seek to structure our transactions so they do not constitute “investment securities” for purposes of federal securities law, and we monitor our holdings as a whole to ensure that no more than 40% of our total assets may consist of investment securities.

The principal specialty finance solutions we provide are high-interest short-term lending arrangements. On occasion, theseThese lending arrangements ordinarily involve us obtaining collateral as security for the borrower’s repayment of funds to us. In some circles, short-term high-interest collateralized lending is referred to as “hard-money lending.”

We believe we are generally able to charge high interest for our specialty finance solutions because: (i) banks and other traditional providers of credit may have neither the expertise nor the infrastructure needed to evaluate creditworthiness and risks in a timeframe suitable for a potential borrower, preferring instead to process transactions and structures that present few novel issues or risks; and (ii) we will often be able to devote time and attention to transactions involving a smaller dollar amount than an institutional lender will view as worthwhile. These beliefs essentially explain why we refer to our business as “specialty finance”— financing that may involve structures that are unique, creative, and often bespoke; and that may involve dollar amounts that are not suitable for institutional lenders.

We generally provide specialty finance solutions that are short-term in nature. By this, we mean lending arrangements that mature or come due within nine months of the lending date. We view the provision of short-term finance as desirable for two principal reasons: (i) it helps minimize the risk of non-performance; and (ii) it helps minimize regulatory risk.

In terms of non-performance risk, short-term lending requires us to focus upon, and a potential borrower to identify to us, a near-term source of liquidity for repayment of the funds they borrow from us. This permits us to evaluate that source of repayment clearly and carefully, thus helping identify the potential risks involved in a particular transaction and how we may be able to include structural terms, such as specific collateral and collateral arrangements, guarantees, or other types of covenants that mitigate these risks.

In terms of regulatory risk, short-term lending permits us to avail ourselves of a court-recognized exception for treating promissory notes (evidencing a loan) as “investment securities” under federal securities law. In sum, this exception generally applies to promissory notes with short-term maturities of nine months or less. Our ability to avail ourselves of this exception, and to more generally structure our transactions in such a way as to avoid them being properly considered as “investment securities” under federal securities laws, is important to our ability to avoid once again becoming subject to regulation under the 1940 Act. Below we discuss our process for evaluating transactional terms and structures with a view to remaining outside of the regulatory regime of the 1940 Act (please refer to “Investment Process” below).

Examples of the kinds of the specialty finance solutions we have considered or provided to date, and may continue to provide in the future, include:

In addition, we are presently exploring and evaluating our ability to enter into other kinds of short-term specialty finance transactions. Examples include the expansion of our efforts to purchase adjudicated settlements, the purchase (at discounted rates) of receivables owing to professionals on account of certain workers’ compensation claim, and short-term consumer finance lending.

Sourcing Transactions

We believe that our management’s strong combination of experience and contacts in the securities and investment finance sector, including the experience and contacts of our independent directors, should be sufficient to continue attracting suitable prospective investment opportunities. To date, the network of contacts of our management and directors has been successful thus far in sourcing all of the transactions in which we have participated. Accordingly, we presently do not have any plans to hire any business development professionals to assist us with transactional volume.

Experience and Competitive Strengths

The market for specialty finance is competitive, largely as a result of the participation of various types of professionally managed pooled investment funds such as private equity funds, debt and mezzanine-debt funds, and other types of professional finance companies seeking the high returns that are possible in specialty finance and hard-money lending. Nevertheless, we believe we are well positioned to compete successfully in this market because of our entrepreneurial, creative and flexible approach to specialty finance opportunities, and our management’s experience in entrepreneurial ventures and finance.

Throughout our history and in particular after ceasing to be a business development company (“BDC”), we have approached investment opportunities flexibly and creatively in terms of transactional structures and terms. In part, we are able to be flexible and creative because we are not subject to many of the regulatory limitations that govern our other more traditional or institutional competitors. Those competitors are often subject to limitations on the type transactions they undertake, the amount that may be invested in a specific transaction or a particular type of transaction, the markets in which they operate, the maturity or time horizon of their investment, uses of proceeds, or otherwise. These limitations are often imposed by the agreements and documents governing the pooled investment vehicles, or otherwise self-imposed in order to facilitate the investment vetting and diligence process, and the documentation and structuring process. More rarely, these limitations may arise from governing regulations or interpretations thereof. For our part, we believe that approaching investment opportunities flexibly expands our overall transactional opportunities, diversifies our risk by avoiding dependence in any material way on a particular borrower, type of transaction, or market or industry niche permits us to avail ourselves of the maximum number of relationships from which we source investment opportunities. Moreover, we believe that this flexible approach to structuring our transactions and investments will facilitate the development of positive long-term relationships with our borrowers.

We believe that the only significant limitation on our ability to flexibly structure transactions arises from our desire to remain outside the regulation of the 1940 Act. In order to meet this goal, we intend and aim to structure the vast majority of our transactions (by dollar amount) in ways such that they are not properly considered “investment securities” under federal securities laws, including the 1940 Act.

For our investors, the freedom afforded to us through the lack of substantive regulation governing the types of transactions we enter into and our methods of operation permits us to allocate our resources, at any given point in time, to those types of transactions that we believe may lead to the highest risk-adjusted returns or the steadiest stream of such returns.

Our management team and Boardboard of Directorsdirectors has significant experience in a variety of entrepreneurial ventures, including service as management and directors for small and large public companies, private businesses, start-up and development-stage businesses, and the securities and finance industries. As a result of this diverse general experience and particular experience in transactional finance, we

believe we are able to manage the evaluation and due-diligence process involved in our investment opportunities swiftly and efficiently, by collaborating with our professional advisers and focusing on high-level and material issues.

Investment Process

We have identified several criteria that we believe are generally important guidelines for us to meet our financial objectives. These criteria are, however, only general guidelines for our investment decisions and, in the case of some transactions in which we invest, fewer than all—or even none—of these criteria will be met.

If we believe that a potential transaction generally meets the characteristics described above or if we otherwise determine that a potential transaction may be desirable to enter into, we may perform a more rigorous due-diligence examination of the prospective borrower, the likely source or sources of liquidity for their repayment to us, and other aspects of the borrower or its assets (e.g., assets of the borrower that may serve as collateral security for the obligations that may be owing to us). Our due-diligence examination for each transaction will necessarily be unique and tailored to the specific transaction, but will generally be undertaken in light of the following facts and circumstances:

The assessments described above outline our general approach for our investment decisions, although not all of such activities will be followed in each instance, or some may be stressed more than others depending on facts and circumstances. Upon successful completion of this preliminary evaluation, we will typically (1) evaluate our own regulatory concerns (i.e., to what extent the potential transaction may properly be considered an investment in an “investment security” for purposes of the 1940 Act and, if necessary, consider alternative structures to alleviate any risks to our company relating thereto), and (2) decide whether to move forward towards negotiating a letter of intent and, thereafter, definitive documentation for our transaction. Depending on timing, we may not use a letter of intent and will instead proceed directly to definitive documentation.

Reverse Stock Split

We expect to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at an assumed 1-for-2.25 ratio to occur immediately following the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part but prior to the closing of the offering. No fractional shares will be issued in connection with the reverse stock split and all such fractional interests will be rounded up to the nearest whole number of shares of common stock. Share information presented in this prospectus, other than where noted and in our unaudited and audited financial statements and the notes thereto and other historical discussions of share issuances, such as shares issued in connection with acquisitions, have been adjusted to give effect to such reverse stock split.

Corporate Information

Our executive offices are located at 1907 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 205, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391, and our telephone number is: (952) 479-1923. Our corporate website address is www.millcityventures3.com. Our website and the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, the website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in, and is not considered part of, this prospectus. You should not rely on any such information in making your decision whether to invest in our securities.

​

Summary of the Offering

We expect to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at an assumed 1-for-2.25 ratio to occur immediately following the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part but prior to the closing of the offering. Share information below is presented on a post-reverse stock split basis.

​

​

​

Consolidated Statements of Operations

​

​

​

​

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Investing in shares of our common stock involves certain risks. Set forth below is a summary of the principal risks associated with an investment in our common stock. You should consider carefully the following discussion of risks, as well as the discussion of risks included in this prospectus including in the section “Risk Factors” starting on page 12, before you decide that an investment in our shares is appropriate for you.

​

​

​

​

​

​

RISK FACTORS

An investment in shares of our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making a decision to invest in shares of our Common Stock, you should carefully consider the risks that are described in this section, in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the other information that we file from time to time with the SEC. Additional risks not presently known or that we currently deem immaterial could also materially and adversely affect us. You should consult your own financial and legal advisors as to the risks entailed by an investment in shares of our Common Stock and the suitability of investing in our shares in light of your particular circumstances. If any of the risks contained in this prospectus develop into actual events, our assets, business, cash flows, condition (financial or otherwise), credit quality, financial performance, liquidity, long-term performance goals, prospects, and/or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment. Some statements in this prospectus, including such statements in the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. See the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” on page 4 of this prospectus.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS

We have little operating history upon which to evaluate our current business.

We withdrew our election to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act at the end of 2019, and during the two years since that time have refocused our business on providing short-term specialty finance to private businesses, small-cap public companies and high-net-worth individuals. Given that our current business has been developed and pursued over the two years prior to this prospectus, and the comparative prior-year financials included in this prospectus reflect, in part, the results of operations for a different business, investors have little means to evaluate the likelihood of our future success.

We may need to raise additional capital to fund our operations, and such capital may not be available to us in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms.

For the time being, management believes that our current cash is sufficient to continue operations for the foreseeable future, and has no potential or actual plans to seek additional financing. Nevertheless, various future developments may cause us to seek or require additional financing. For instance, we may determine to seek additional financing to avail ourselves of additional opportunities to provide specialty finance solutions to borrowers. Alternatively, we may seek additional financing in the event that a material portion of our investments default, leaving us with little means to pay for our operations and continue making investments.

In any event, additional financing could be sought from a number of sources, including but not limited to additional sales of equity or debt securities, or loans from financial institutions or our affiliates. We cannot, however, be certain that any such financing will be available on terms favorable or acceptable to us, if at all. If additional funds are raised by the issuance of our equity securities, such as through the issuance of stock, convertible securities, or the issuance and exercise of warrants, then the ownership interest of our existing shareholders will be diluted. If additional funds are raised by the issuance of debt or other equity instruments, we may become subject to certain operational limitations, and such securities may have rights senior to the rights of our common shareholders. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to consummate acquisitions or investments desired by our management and board.

If we are unable to maintain diverse and robust sources of capital, our growth prospects, business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business depends on maintaining diverse and robust sources of capital to originate loans. On January 3, 2022, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Eastman Investment, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Lyle A. Berman, as trustee of the Lyle A. Berman Revocable Trust (collectively, the “Lenders”). Mr. Berman is a director of our company. Under the Loan Agreement, the Lenders made available to us a $5 million revolving line of credit for us to use in the ordinary course of our short-term specialty finance business. Amounts drawn under the Loan Agreement accrue interest at the per annum rate of 8%, and all our obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by a grant of a collateral security interest in substantially all of our assets. As a Lender, Mr. Berman is obligated to furnish only one-half of the aggregate $5 million available under the Loan Agreement. The Loan Agreement has a five-year term ending on January 3, 2027, at which time all amounts owing under the Loan Agreement will become due and payable; subject, however, to each Lender’s right, including Mr. Berman, to terminate the Loan Agreement, solely with respect

Transactions”. We cannot be sure that this funding sources, or others, will continue to be available on reasonable terms or at all beyond the current maturity dates of our existing credit facilities.

Events of default or breaches of financial, performance or other covenants, or worse than expected performance of certain pools of loans underpinning our credit facilities, could reduce or terminate our access to funding from such facilities. The availability and capacity of sources of capital also depends on many factors that are outside of our control, such as credit market volatility and regulatory reforms. In the event that we do not maintain adequate sources of capital, we may not be able to maintain the necessary levels of funding to retain current loan volume, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our search for and ability to consummate specialty finance investment opportunities may be materially and adversely affected by COVID-19.

The global spread of the novel strain of coronavirus known as COVID-19 and its variants, declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020, has resulted in governmental impositions of mandatory closures, quarantines and other restrictions on, or advisories with respect to, travel, business operations and public gatherings or interactions. It is unclear whether the pandemic may significantly worsen during the upcoming months, which may result in further restrictions on business, travel, and other activities.

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected the domestic and global economies and financial markets, and the business of our potential borrowers could be materially and adversely affected, decreasing our appetite to consummate transactions that we might have otherwise concluded were attractive. Furthermore, we may be unable to complete an investment if continued concerns relating to COVID-19 continue to restrict travel, limit the ability to have meetings or access a potential borrower’s personnel. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our search for new investment opportunities will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 or other matters of domestic or global concern continue for an extensive period of time, our ability to consummate investments, or the operations of our potential and actual borrowers, may be materially adversely affected. Of course, materially adverse effects upon the operations of our actual borrowers could impair their ability to pay us all of the amounts owing to us, or to pay us in a timely manner.

Finally, our ability to consummate additional transactions may be dependent on our ability to raise equity and debt financing. This ability may be impacted by COVID-19 and other events, including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all. Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic may generally have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section by increasing their likelihood or amplifying their magnitude.

Changes in consumer finance and other applicable laws and regulations, as well as changes in government enforcement policies and priorities, may negatively impact the management of our business, results of operations, ability to offer certain products or the terms and conditions upon which they are offered, and ability to compete.

Consumer finance regulation is constantly changing, and new laws or regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, could have a materially adverse impact on our ability to operate as currently intended, and cause us to incur significant expense in order to ensure compliance. Federal and state financial services regulators are also enforcing existing laws, regulations, and rules aggressively and enhancing their supervisory expectations regarding the management of legal and regulatory compliance risks. These regulatory changes and uncertainties make our business planning more difficult and could result in changes to our business model and potentially adversely impact our results of operations. As to the parts of our business that operate as a non-bank lender, we are subject to state licensing and usury laws. Furthermore, to the extent applicable, these laws can impose specific statutory liabilities upon creditors who fail to comply with their provisions and may affect the enforceability of a loan. If the application of consumer protection laws were to cause our loans, or any of the terms of our loans, to be unenforceable against the relevant borrowers, our business may be materially adversely affected. Even if we seek to comply with licensing and other requirements that we believe may be applicable to us, if we are found to not have complied with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or authorizations or face other sanctions or penalties or be required to obtain a license in one or more such jurisdictions, which may have an adverse effect on our business.

and state regulators have the authority to promulgate or change regulations that could have a similar effect on our operating environment. We cannot determine with any degree of certainty whether any such legislative or regulatory proposals will be enacted and, if enacted, the ultimate impact that any such potential legislation or implementing regulations, or any such potential regulatory actions by federal or state regulators, would have upon our business.

New laws, regulations, policy or changes in enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business, or reexamination of current practices, could adversely impact our profitability, limit our ability to continue existing or pursue new business activities, require us to change certain of our business practices, affect retention of key personnel, or expose us to additional costs (including increased compliance costs and/or customer remediation). These changes also may require us to invest significant resources, and devote significant management attention, to make any necessary changes and could adversely affect our business.

Although we have identified general guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective investment opportunities, we may enter into transactions with borrowers that do not meet such guidelines, increasing the risk that the price of our publicly traded securities could be volatile.

Although we have identified general guidelines for evaluating prospective investment opportunities, it is possible that a borrower with which we enter into a transaction will not have all, or any, of the attributes outlined in those guidelines. If we complete transactions with borrowers that do not meet some or any of these guidelines, it is possible that such an investment may not be as successful as an alternative opportunity that were to satisfy some or all of those guidelines. Investments that do not perform as well as imagined, or as well as they otherwise might have, in combination with the public knowledge that we may stray, or have strayed, from strict implementation of our investment guidelines, could affect the volatility of the trading price of our publicly traded securities.

We may provide specialty finance solutions to early-stage companies, financially unstable businesses, or a borrower lacking an established record of revenue or earnings, which could adversely affect the price of our publicly traded securities.

While we believe that being entrepreneurial in our approach to specialty finance is a strength, we may complete investments with an early-stage company, a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenues, cash flows or earnings. These kinds of transactions present numerous risks associated with investing in a business without a proven business model and with limited historical financial data, volatile revenues, cash flows or earnings and difficulties in obtaining and retaining key personnel. Although our management endeavors to evaluate the risks inherent in each particular investment we consider and make, we may not be able to properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors and we may not have adequate time to complete a full evaluation of those risks. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business. The manifestation of any of these risks could adversely affect the trading price of our publicly traded securities.

Many of our specialty finance investment transactions involve borrowers about which little, if any, information is publicly available, which may impair our ability to identify borrowers able to repay our loans and adversely affect the price of our publicly traded securities.

In pursuing our business, we often interact with privately held companies about which very little public information exists. As a result, we are often required to make our investment decision on the basis of limited information, nearly all of which is obtained from the business itself, which may result in our consummating an investment with a borrower that is not as solvent or profitable as we suspected, if at all. These risks could affect our results of operations and, ultimately, the trading price of our publicly traded securities.

The industries in which we compete are highly competitive, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

The industries in which we compete are highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant changes. We compete against companies and financial institutions across the retail banking, financial services, consumer technology and financial technology services industries, as well as other nonbank lenders serving credit-challenged consumers, including online marketplace lenders, check cashers, point-of-sale lenders and payday lenders. We may compete with others in the market who may in the future provide offerings similar to ours, particularly companies who may provide money management, lending and other services. These and other competitors in the banking and financial technology industries are introducing innovative products and services that may compete with ours. We

our products and successfully compete with those of our competitors, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.

Many existing and potential competitors are entities substantially larger in size, have more resources, are more highly diversified in revenue and substantially more established with significantly more brand awareness than ours. As such, many of our competitors can leverage their size, robust networks, financial wherewithal, brand awareness, pricing power and technological assets to compete with us. To the extent new entrants gain market share, the demand for our services would decline. If price competition materially intensifies, we may have to decrease the prices of our products and services, which would likely adversely affect the results of operations.

Our long-term success depends on our ability to compete effectively against existing and potential competitors that seek to provide banking and financial technology services. If we fail to compete effectively against these competitors, our revenues, results of operations, prospects for future growth and overall business will be materially and adversely affected.

If we are deemed to be an investment company under the 1940 Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted. In such an event, our business would likely be materially and adversely affected.

If we are deemed to be an investment company under the 1940 Act, then our activities may be restricted, including:

In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the 1940 Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion or exemption, we must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of “investment securities”“securities” and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.

We do not believe that our principal activities will subject us to the 1940 Act. To this end, we hold in reserve un-invested assets in cash or United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the 1940 Act, which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Furthermore, we monitor our investment holdings as a whole to ensure that investments and other holdings which may be considered “investment securities” do not comprise more than 40% of our total assets. We undertake this analysis (1) on a quarterly basis and in connection with the review and preparation of our financial statements filed as part of our quarterly and annual reports with the SEC, and (2) at other times when we are considering how to structure a new transaction that is of a significant size—with “significance” largely based on the outcome of our most recent quarterly review. This review is generally undertaken by our Chief Financial Officer and may involve outside legal counsel, in particular in a case where we are considering the structure of a potential new transaction.

If, however, we do not invest as discussed above or are otherwise unsuccessful in ensuring that no more than 40% of our total assets consist of “investment securities,” then we may be deemed to be subject to the 1940 Act. If that were to be the case, compliance with the additional regulatory burdens imposed under the 1940 Act would require additional expenses for which we have not allotted funds, and would surely hinder our ability to operate as profitably as we have since the withdrawal of our BDC election. This outcome maywould likely adversely affect the trading price of our publicly traded securities.securities, potentially jeopardize the viability and enforceability of contracts to which we are a party and, depending on the circumstances could involve litigation that would likely prove costly to us financially and materially and adversely affect our prospects and the market and price for our common stock.

We may engage in transactions with businesses that may be affiliated with our officers, directors or significant shareholders, and which may involve actual or potential conflicts of interest.

We may decide to make investments in one or more businesses affiliated with our officers, directors or significant shareholders. Such investment opportunities may compete with other opportunities for our investment dollars. Although we are not specifically focusing on, or targeting, any particular transaction with any affiliates or affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such an affiliated investment were attractive from a risk-adjusted return perspective, and such transaction were approved by a majority of our independent and disinterested directors. Any such activity would involve actual or potential conflicts of interest. Although we are confident that we can navigate these conflicts consistent with best practices and applicable law, the existence or appearance of such conflicts of interest could make our publicly traded securities less attractive and thereby reduce their trading prices.

A limited number of shareholders control substantially all of our voting stock and, as a result, control the election of our board of directors. As a result, these shareholders may exert an influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.

Five shareholders own shares representing approximately 63.42% of our issued and outstanding common stock. As a result, investors in our common stock cannot reasonably expect to have any influence over the election of our directors or other matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders. Instead, our existing significant shareholders will exert a substantial influence on the election of our directors and any actions requiring or otherwise put to a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support. Examples of such voting matters, apart from the election of our directors, includes amendments to our articles of incorporation, bylaws, and approval of major corporate transactions. The concentrated amount of control over our affairs held by a relatively few number of significant investors could serve to reduce the attractiveness or liquidity of our common stock, and thereby depress its trading price.

Our ability to identify and consummate investment opportunities, and any need we may have for additional capital, may be affected by general economic conditions.

General economic conditions may impact our ability to (i) identify and pursue and consummate investment opportunities, and (ii) if necessary, seek and obtain additional financing on terms acceptable or favorable to us, if at all. Therefore, a deterioration in general economic conditions may adversely affect our business or slow the growth of our business.

Our reputation and brand are important to our success, and if we are unable to continue developing our reputation and brand, our ability to retain existing capital sources, our ability to attract borrowers and our ability to maintain and improve our relationship with regulators of our industry could be adversely affected.

We believe that maintaining a strong brand and trustworthy reputation is critical to our success and our ability to attract borrowers, attract new capital sources and maintain good relations with regulators and existing capital sources. Factors that affect our brand and reputation include: our industry and our company, including the quality and reliability of our Investment Process, see “Business – Investment Process”; the accuracy of our Investment Process; our loan funding programs; our ability to effectively manage and resolve borrower complaints; collection practices; privacy and security practices; litigation; regulatory activity; and the overall customer experience. Negative publicity or negative public perception of these factors, even if inaccurate, could adversely affect our brand and reputation.

For example, consumer advocacy groups, politicians and certain government and media reports have, in the past, advocated governmental action to prohibit or severely restrict consumer loan arrangements where banks contract with a third-party such as ours to provide origination assistance services to bank customers. Such criticism has frequently been levied in the context of payday loan marketers, though other entities operating programs through which loans similar to loans facilitated by us are originated have also faced criticism. The perceived improper use of a bank charter by these entities has been challenged by both governmental authorities and private litigants, in part because of the higher rates and fees a bank is permitted to charge consumers in certain payday and small-dollar lending programs relative to non-bank lenders. State regulators have made statements in the past threatening regulatory action against lenders like us related to loans originated by state chartered-banks, and such statements and the perception of possible regulatory action could adversely affect our reputation and the willingness of new or existing capital sources to work with us. Bank regulators have also required banks to exit third-party programs that the regulators determined involved unsafe and unsound practices or present other risks to the bank. If we are associated with such payday or small-dollar consumer loans, or if we are associated with increased criticism of non-payday loan programs involving relationships between bank originators and non-bank lending platforms and program managers,

demand for loans facilitated by us could significantly decrease, which could cause our new or existing capital sources to terminate their arrangements with us, impede our ability to attract capital sources or reduce the number of potential borrowers. In addition, the increased focus on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues could damage our reputation or prospects if customers, prospective customers, investors or third parties assigning ESG ratings to us are of the opinion that our practices, including without limitation our lending practices, are not sufficiently robust from an ESG perspective. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Any negative publicity or negative public perception of loans facilitated by us or other similar consumer loans or the consumer lending service we provide may also result in us being subject to more restrictive interpretation or application of laws and regulations and potential investigations and enforcement actions. We may also become subject to additional lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, or other challenges such as government enforcement or arbitration. If there are changes in the laws or in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws affecting consumer loans similar to those offered by us, or our servicing of such loans, or if we become subject to such lawsuits, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Harm to our reputation can also arise from many other sources, including employee or former employee misconduct, misconduct by outsourced service providers or other counterparties, failure by us to meet minimum standards of service and quality, and inadequate protection of borrower information and compliance failures and claims. If we are unable to protect our reputation, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

We are highly dependent on the services provided by certain executives and key personnel.

Our success depends in significant part upon the continued service of our senior management personnel. In particular, we are materially dependent upon the services of Douglas M. Polinsky, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Joseph A. Geraci, II, our Chief Financial Officer and a director of our company. Although we currently have employment agreements with these individuals, these agreements will not necessarily prevent the departure of these executives, whether due to death, disability, retirement or otherwise. Any loss of the services provided by these executives would likely have a material and adverse effect on our operations and ability to execute our business plans.

Our articles of incorporation grant our board of directors the power to designate and issue additional shares and classes of common and preferred stock.

Our authorized capital consists of 250,000,000 shares of capital stock.stock (or 111,111,111 shares of capital stock on a post-split basis). Pursuant to authority granted by our articles of incorporation, our board of directors, without any action by our shareholders, may designate and issue shares in such classes or series (including other classes or series of preferred stock) as it deems appropriate, and may establish the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation and voting rights. The rights of holders of new classes or series of stock that may be so designated and issued could be superior to the rights of holders of our common shares. The designation and issuance of shares of capital stock having preferential rights could adversely affect other rights appurtenant to shares of our common stock. Furthermore, any issuances of additional stock—common or preferred—will dilute the ownership interests of then-current holders of our common stock and may dilute our book value per share.

We may issue additional common stock or preferred shares without the approval of our shareholders. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.

Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 250,000,000 shares of capital stock.stock (or 111,111,111 shares of capital stock on a post-split basis). Because we have only 10,790,4134,824,719 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of July 13, 2022, our board of directors has the power and authority to issue a substantial number of additional shares of common stock or preferred shares. The issuance of additional common stock or preferred shares:

market conditions, such as recessions, loss of investor confidence, interest rate changes, or international currency fluctuations, may negatively affect the market price of our shares.

assets after subtracting our liabilities. See “Dilution” for a more complete description of how the value of your investment will be diluted upon the completion of this offering.

There can be no assurances that our common stock, once listed on Nasdaq, will not be subject to potential delisting if we do not continue to maintain the listing requirements of Nasdaq.

We will applyhave applied to list the shares of our common stock on the Nasdaq, under the symbol “____.“MCVT.” An approval of our listing application by Nasdaq will be subject to, among other things, our fulfilling all of the listing requirements of Nasdaq. In addition, Nasdaq has rules for continued listing, including, without limitation, minimum market capitalization and other requirements. Failure to maintain our listing (i.e., being de-listed from Nasdaq), would make it more difficult for shareholders to sell our common stock and more difficult to obtain accurate price quotations on our common stock. This could have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Our ability to issue additional securities for financing or other purposes, or otherwise to arrange for any financing we may need in the future, may also be materially and adversely affected if our common stock is not traded on a national securities exchange.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Securities and industry analysts do not currently, and may never, publish research on our company. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our company, the trading price for our stock may be negatively impacted. In the event securities or industry analysts initiate coverage, if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price may decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

If our shares of common stock become subject to the penny stock rules, it would become more difficult to trade our shares.

USE OF PROCEEDS

Based upon an assumed public offering price of $$4.00 per share, we estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this offering, after deducting the underwriting discounts and the estimated offering expenses payable by us, of approximately $$4,100,000 assuming the Underwriter does not exercise its over-allotment option.

We plan to use the net proceeds we receive from this offering for the following purposes:

​

​

The foregoing represents our current intentions based upon our present plans and business conditions to use and allocate the net proceeds of this offering. However, the nature, amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly depending on numerous factors. As a result, our management has and will retain broad discretion over the allocation of the net proceeds from this offering. We may find it necessary or advisable to use the net proceeds from this offering for other purposes, and we will have broad discretion in the application of net proceeds from this offering. To the extent that the net proceeds we receive from this offering are not immediately used for the above purposes, we intend to invest our net proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing bank deposits or debt instruments.

​

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have paid cash dividends on our common stock periodically.

On December 8, 2020, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.05 per share to our shareholders of record as of December 21, 2020. The dividend was paid on January 4, 2021. On September 17, 2021, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.10 per share to our shareholders of record as of October 15, 2021. The dividend was paid on October 29, 2021.

We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the growth and development of our business, and we do not anticipate that we will declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders in the future will depend upon our liquidity and capital requirements, as well as our earnings and financial condition, the general economic climate, contractual restrictions, our ability to service any equity or debt obligations senior to our common stock, and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

​

CAPITALIZATION

Set forth below is our cash and capitalization as of ,March 31, 2022:

​

​

You should read the information in the below table together with our financial statements and related notes, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” each included elsewhere in this prospectus.

​

​

​

​

DILUTION

If you invest in our shares in this offering, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share of common stock and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock immediately after this offering.

Our historical net tangible book value as of ,March 31, 2022 was ($), or $(0. )$2.87 per share on March 31, 2022 (giving effect to the reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock.stock at an assumed 1-for-2.25 ratio expected to occur immediately following the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part but prior to the closing of the offering). Our historical net tangible book value is the amount of our total tangible assets less our liabilities. Historical net tangible book value per share of common stock is our historical net tangible book value divided by the number of outstanding shares of common stock as of ,March 31, 2022.

Our pro forma net tangible book value as of ,March 31, 2022 was $$3.12 per share of common stock.stock (giving effect to the 1-for-2.25 reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock at an assumed 1-for-2.25 ratio expected to occur immediately following the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part but prior to the closing of the offering). Pro forma net tangible

book value per share represents our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares of common stock, after giving effect to the pro forma adjustments referenced under “Capitalization.”

After giving effect to this offering, at an assumed public offering price of $$4.00 per share, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our net tangible book value on a pro forma as adjusted basis as of ,March 31, 2022

The principal specialty finance solutions we provide are high-interest short-term lending arrangements. On occasion, theseThese lending arrangements ordinarily involve us obtaining collateral as security for the borrower’s repayment of funds to us. In some circles, short-term high-interest collateralized lending is referred to as “hard-money lending.”

We believe we are generally able to charge high interest for our specialty finance solutions because (i) banks and other traditional providers of credit may have neither the expertise nor the infrastructure needed to evaluate creditworthiness and risks in a timeframe suitable for a potential borrower, preferring instead to process transactions and structures that present few novel issues or

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 compared with the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021

Our operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 were as follows:

​

​

Investment Income

We generate revenue primarily in the form of interest income and capital gains, if any, on the debt instruments we own. We may also generate revenue from dividends and capital gains on equity investments we make, if any, or on warrants or other equity interests that we may acquire. In some cases, the interest on our investments may accrue or be paid in the form of additional debt. The principal amount of the debt instruments, together with any accrued but unpaid interest thereon, will generally become due at the maturity date of those debt instruments. Finally, we may also generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, structuring, diligence, or consulting fees. Any such fees will be recognized as earned.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, our total investment income was $1,000,206 and $546,842, respectively. The increase is due to the increase in our short-term non-bank lending activity. Our loan portfolio generates interest income, with an average rate on the loans of 22.4%.

Professional Fees

For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, we had $198,518 and $142,808 of professional fees expense, respectively. The increase in 2022 is due to an increase in our short-term non-bank lending activity and the legal costs incurred to close those deals.

Net Realized Gain from Investments

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, we had $1,152,898 of proceeds from sale of investments, resulting in $138,770 of realized gains. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, we had $5,036,657 of proceeds from sale of investments, resulting in $2,907,999 of realized gains.

Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, our investments included $22,047 of unrealized depreciation. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, our investments included $513,250 of unrealized depreciation.

Changes in Net Assets from Operations

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, we recorded a net increase in net assets from operations of $412,111. Based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2022, our per-share net increase in net assets from operations was $0.04. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, we recorded a net increase in net assets from operations of $1,745,042. Based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2021, our per-share net increase in net assets from operations was $0.16.

Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 and 2021

The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of purchases, redemptions and repayments of portfolio investments, among other factors. For the three months ended March 31, 2022, net cash used in operating activities was $7,190,128. Cash flows used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2022 were primarily related to purchases of investments totaling $7,025,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, net cash used in operating activities was $4,402,126. Cash flows provided in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2021 were primarily related to purchases of investments totaling $9,430,664, offset by repayments of investments totaling $5,036,657.

Portfolio and Investment Activity

During the three months ended March 31, 2022, we made $7,025,000 of investments and had $1,152,898 of redemptions and repayments, resulting in net investments at amortized cost of $19,943,929 as of March 31, 2022.

During the three months ended March 31, 2021, we made $9,430,664 of investments and had $5,036,657 of redemptions and repayments, resulting in net investments at amortized cost of $12,276,332 as of March 31, 2021.

Our portfolio composition by major class, based on fair value at March 31, 2022, was as follows:

​

​

Results of Operations

​

Year Ended Decemeber 31, 2021 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2020

​

​

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we earned $11,480 in interest payments from one eligible portfolio companyinvestment - DBR Enclave US Investors, LLC -LLC; an aggregate of $2,099,684 from twenty-six promissory note26 other investments; an additional $25,037 in bank interest on cash balances and notes receivable; an aggregate of $467,500 in origination fees; and an additional $52,500 in late fee penalties.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we earned $44,026 in interest payments from one investment - DBR Enclave US Investors, LLC -LLC; an aggregate of $993,795 from six promissory note investments; an aggregate of $26,994 in bank interest on cash balances and notes receivable; an aggregate of $217,360 in origination fees; and an aggregate of $15,462 in dividend payments from four investments-Manning & Napier, Inc., Educational Development Corp., Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.; and Windstream Holdings, Inc.

As the table above indicates, we incurred operating expenses aggregating $1,354,751 for the year ended December 31, 2021, and $735,790 for the year ended December 31, 2020. A discussion of the various components of our operating expenses for these periods is set forth below.

General Operating Expenses. Our general operating expenses were $116,714 for the year ended December 31, 2021 and $83,447 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in the current period is primarily related to an increase in corporate franchise taxes.

Legal and Accounting Expenses. Our legal and accounting expenses were $453,440 for the year ended December 31, 2021 and $175,612 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in the current period is primarily related to increased costs incurred on consulting and underwriting endeavors, as well as an increased cost in our audit and tax services.

Executive Management Compensation. Our executive management compensation was $556,432 for the year ended December 31, 2020 and $301,494 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in the current period is primarily related to a one-time bonus payment made during the year 2021.

For the year ended December 31, 2021 our net investment gain was $1,301,450. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our net investment gain was $561,847. The increased net investment gain during 2021 was primarily the result of higher interest income earned during 2021 from the short-term specialty finance solutions we provided in the form of short-term promissory notes bearing higher rates of interest and return, including related origination fees, than we were able to obtain when operating as a BDC.

Financial Condition

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had an increase in net assets of $1,773,162. This increase in net assets was primarily due to the increase in our interest income earned from short-term specialty financing. Our net assets increased by $1,572,354 for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to the appreciation of our portfolio holdings.

obtained through maturing investments earlier made, will be sufficient for the Company to fund its operations through the entirety of fiscal 2022. Accordingly, at present we have no definitive plans to obtain other sources of liquidity through borrowing.

On February 11, 2022, we filed a registration statement on Form S-1 seeking to register an offering of five-year common stock warrants which we may distribute to our shareholders as a dividend, and up to 2,697,603 shares of our common stock purchasable upon the exercise of those warrants. The warrants are contemplated to be exercisable at a price of $4.00 per share of common stock. We intend to apply to have the warrants listed for trading on the OTC Markets.

The offering is subject to the effectiveness of the registration statement on Form S-1. At this time, no record date has been established for the dividend. The warrants will not be issued until the registration statement is declared effective, and the warrants will not be exercisable unless such registration statement remains effective. If the offering is consummated, we expect to use net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes, including but not limited to extending specialty finance solutions and credit to borrowers and repaying credit facility borrowings.

Capital Expenditures

We did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures in 2021 and we do not anticipate any such capital expenditures for 2022.

Recent Purchases of Securities

During 2020, we engaged in the following repurchases of its common stock, all of which were consummated in private transactions:

​

​

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor are we a party to any contract or other obligation not included on its balance sheet that has, or is reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition.

recognized, and include investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. Unrealized gains or losses primarily reflect the change in investment values, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains or losses when gains or losses are realized.

Investments for which market quotations are readily available are typically valued at such market quotations. In order to validate market quotations, we look at a number of factors to determine if the quotations are representative of fair value, including the source and nature of the quotations. Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded or whose market prices are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee of our Boardboard of Directors,directors, based on, among other things, the input of our executive management, Audit Committee and independent third party valuation expert that may be engaged by management to assist in the valuation of our portfolio investments. Valuation determinations are in all cases made in conformity with the written valuation policies and procedures respecting the valuation of Company investments.

Use ofCritical Accounting Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordanceconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. The application ofU.S. GAAP, which requires that weus to make estimates and assumptions that affect ourthe reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuerevenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base ourperiods. Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates on historical experienceabout the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable undermay change in subsequent periods.

In preparing the circumstances. We evaluate ourfinancial statements, management will make estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actualthat affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. In preparing the financial statements, management also will utilize available information, including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Actual results maywill almost certainly differ significantly from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. As our expected operating results occur, we will describe additional critical accounting policies in the notes to our financial statements. Our most critical accounting policies relate to the valuation of our portfolio investments, and revenue recognition.

BUSINESS

Overview

Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. is a Minnesota corporation that was incorporated in January 2006. From our inception until December 13, 2012, we were a development-stage company involved in the gaming and entertainment industry. In 2013, we elected to become a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). We operated as a BDC until we withdrew our BDC election on December 27, 2019. Since that time, we have engaged in the business of providing short-term specialty finance solutions primarily to private businesses, micro- and small-cap public companies and high-net-worth individuals. To avoid again becoming subject to regulation under the 1940 Act, we generally seek to structure our transactions so they do not constitute “investment securities” for purposes of federal securities law, and we monitor our holdings as a whole to ensure that no more than 40% of our total assets may consist of investment securities.

The principal specialty finance solutions we provide are high-interest short-term lending arrangements. On occasion, these lending arrangements involve us obtaining collateral as security for the borrower’s repayment of funds to us. In some circles, short-term high-interest collateralized lending is referred to as “hard-money lending.”

We believe we are generally able to charge high interest for our specialty finance solutions because: (i) banks and other traditional providers of credit may have neither the expertise nor the infrastructure needed to evaluate creditworthiness and risks in a timeframe suitable for a potential borrower, preferring instead to process transactions and structures that present few novel issues or risks; and (ii) we will often be able to devote time and attention to transactions involving a smaller dollar amount than an institutional lender will view as worthwhile. These beliefs essentially explain why we refer to our business as “specialty finance”— financing that may involve structures that are unique, creative, and often bespoke; and that may involve dollar amounts that are not suitable for institutional lenders.

In terms of non-performance risk, short-term lending requires us to focus upon, and a potential borrower to identify to us, us a near-term source of liquidity for repayment of the funds they borrow from us. This permits us to evaluate that source of repayment clearly and carefully, thus helping identify the potential risks involved in a particular transaction and how we may be able to include structural terms, such as specific collateral and collateral arrangements, guarantees, or other types of covenants that mitigate these risks.

In terms of regulatory risk, short-term lending permits us to avail ourselves of a court-recognized exception for treating promissory notes (evidencing a loan) as “investment securities” under federal securities law. In sum, this exception generally applies to promissory notes with short-term maturities of nine months. Our ability to avail ourselves of this exception, and to more generally structure our transactions in such a way as to avoid them being properly considered as “investment securities” under federal securities laws, is important to our ability to avoid once again becoming subject to regulation under the 1940 Act. Below we discuss our process for evaluating transactional terms and structures with a view to remaining outside of the regulatory regime of the 1940 Act (please refer to “Investment Process” below).

Examples of the kinds of the specialty finance solutions we have considered or provided to date, and may continue to provide in the future, include:

​

​

In addition, we are presently exploring and evaluating our ability to enter into other kinds of short-term specialty finance transactions. Examples include the expansion of our efforts to purchase adjudicated settlements, the purchase (at discounted rates) of receivables owing to professionals on account of certain workers’ compensation claim, and short-term consumer finance lending.

Sourcing Transactions

We believe that our management’s strong combination of experience and contacts in the securities and investment finance sector, including the experience and contacts of our independent directors, should be sufficient to continue attracting suitable prospective investment opportunities. To date, the network of contacts of our management and directors has been successful thus far in sourcing all of the transactions in which we have participated. Accordingly, we presently do not have any plans to hire any business development professionals to assist us with transactional volume.

Competition

The market for specialty finance is competitive, largely as a result of the participation of various types of professionally managed pooled investment funds such as private equity funds, debt and mezzanine-debt funds, and other types of professional finance companies seeking the high returns that are possible in specialty finance and hard-money lending. Nevertheless, we believe we are well positioned to compete successfully in this market because of our entrepreneurial, creative and flexible approach to specialty finance opportunities, and our management’s experience in entrepreneurial ventures and finance.

Throughout our history and in particular after ceasing to be a BDC, we have approached investment opportunities flexibly and creatively in terms of transactional structures and terms. In part, we are able to be flexible and creative because we are not subject to many of the regulatory limitations that govern our other more traditional or institutional competitors. Those competitors are often subject to limitations on the type transactions they undertake, the amount that may be invested in a specific transaction or a particular type of transaction, the markets in which they operate, the maturity or time horizon of their investment, uses of proceeds, or otherwise. These limitations are often imposed by the agreements and documents governing the pooled investment vehicles, or otherwise self-imposed in order to facilitate the investment vetting and diligence process, and the documentation and structuring process. More rarely, these limitations may arise from governing regulations or interpretations thereof. For our part, we believe that approaching investment opportunities flexibly expands our overall transactional opportunities, diversifies our risk by avoiding dependence in any material way

We believe that the only significant limitation on our ability to flexibly structure transactions arises from our desire to remain outside the regulation of the 1940 Act. In order to meet this goal, we intend and aim to structure the vast majority of our transactions (by dollar amount) in ways such that they are not properly considered “investment securities” under federal securities laws, including the 1940 Act.

For our investors, the freedom afforded to us through the lack of substantive regulation governing the types of transactions we enter into and our methods of operation permits us to allocate our resources, at any given point in time, to those types of transactions that we believe may lead to the highest risk-adjusted returns or the steadiest stream of such returns.

Our management team and Boardboard of Directorsdirectors has significant experience in a variety of entrepreneurial ventures, including service as management and directors for small and large public companies, private businesses, start-up and development-stage businesses, and the securities and finance industries. As a result of this diverse general experience and particular experience in transactional finance, we believe we are able to manage the evaluation and due-diligence process involved in our investment opportunities swiftly and efficiently, by collaborating with our professional advisers and focusing on high-level and material issues.

Other Matters

We do not believe that we are dependent in any material way on any particular borrower, type of specialty finance transaction, or industry.

We do not own or use through license any patents, trademarks, or other intellectual properties and we do not believe that any such assets would be material to our business.

Sometimes the types of transactions we engage in are governed by particular laws, regulations, or rules. For example, lending transactions in which high-net-worth individuals are the borrower will nearly always involve state law usury limitations. Transactions in which we seek and obtain collateral as security for obligations owed to us involve legal issues arising under the Uniform Commercial Code or its various state law iterations. To date, we have not engaged in transactions that require us to obtain state licensure or a permit prior to entering into the transaction—e.g., brokering transactions or engaging in licensed consumer finance activities.

Pending the consummation of transactions and deployment of cash, we generally keep the majority of our assets in cash, cash equivalents such as money-market investments, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.

Our Investment Process

We have identified several criteria that we believe are generally important guidelines for us to meet our financial objectives. These criteria are, however, only general guidelines for our investment decisions and, in the case of some transactions in which we invest, fewer than all—or even none—of these criteria will be met.

​

​

If we believe that a potential transaction generally meets the characteristics described above or if we otherwise determine that a potential transaction may be desirable to enter into, we may perform a more rigorous due-diligence examination of the prospective borrower, the likely source or sources of liquidity for their repayment to us, and other aspects of the borrower or its assets (e.g., assets of the borrower that may serve as collateral security for the obligations that may be owing to us). Our due-diligence examination for each transaction will necessarily be unique and tailored to the specific transaction, but will generally be undertaken in light of the following facts and circumstances:

​

​

The assessments described above outlines our general approach for our investment decisions, although not all of such activities will be followed in each instance, or some may be stressed more than others depending on facts and circumstances. Upon successful completion of this preliminary evaluation, we will typically (1) evaluate our own regulatory concerns (i.e., to what extent the potential transaction may properly be considered an investment in an “investment security” for purposes of the 1940 Act and, if necessary, consider alternative structures to alleviate any risks to our company relating thereto), and (2) decide whether to move forward towards negotiating a letter of intent and, thereafter, definitive documentation for our transaction. Depending on timing, we may not use a letter of intent and will instead proceed directly to definitive documentation.

As indicated above, to avoid becoming subject to the regulatory requirements of the 1940 Act, we monitor our investment holdings as a whole to ensure that investments and other holdings which may be considered “investment securities” do not comprise more than 40% of our total assets. We undertake this analysis (1) on a quarterly basis and in connection with the review and preparation of our financial statements filed as part of our quarterly and annual reports with the SEC, and (2) at other times when we are considering how to structure a new transaction that is of a significant size—with “significance” largely based on the outcome of our most recent quarterly review. This review is generally undertaken by our Chief Financial Officer and may involve our outside legal counsel, in particular in a case where we are considering the structure of a potential new transaction.

In general, our analysis starts with the length or duration of a potential new transaction. Although federal securities laws define “securities” (and “investment securities”) in such a way as to include promissory notes, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Reves v. Ernst & Young, 110 S.

​

In addition to the types of financing arrangements noted above, court precedent indicates that there may be facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction that may cause other promissory notes to not be considered investment securities“securities” or “investment securities” under federal securities laws. For example, it is presumed that a promissory note which matures in more than nine months is a “security,” but this presumption may be rebutted (with the conclusion that such a promissory note is not a properly considered a security) upon an evaluation of the following factors:

​

​

While the application of these factors can be helpful in some instances, often the factors and the proper manner of weighting them are unclear. As a result, the analyses we periodically undertake focuses on the more bright-line types of lending arrangements enumerated above—i.e., promissory notes maturing in nine months or less, etc.

Our Prior Business as a BDC

The analysis of our transactions and transactional holdings is undertaken with a view to ensuring that we do not become subject to the 1940 Act. Generally from 2013 through 2019, we were governed by the 1940 Act. During that time, we were a business development company under the 1940 Act, or “BDC,” primarily focused on investing in or lending to private and small-cap public companies and making managerial assistance available to such companies. As a BDC, our investments included stock of or membership interests (typically referred to as units) in private companies, small-cap public company stocks, and promissory notes. In some cases, the stock or membership interests we acquired were preferred stock or units, and in other cases the stock or membership interests acquired were common stock or units. In connection with our investments in promissory notes, we frequently obtained warrants to purchase common stock.

Our Management and Employees

Currently, Mr. Douglas M. Polinsky, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Boardboard of Directors,directors, and Joseph A. Geraci, II, our Chief Financial Officer and a director of the company, serve as our senior management team. These are also the only two persons who are employees of our company.

Facilities

Our executive offices are located at 1907 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 205, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391, and our telephone number is: (952) 479-1923. We are parties to two operating leases for office space expiring March 31, 2022. These leases do not have significant lease escalations, holidays, concessions, leasehold improvements, or other build-out clauses; and they do not contain contingent-rent provisions. The leases do not include options to renew. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.

Legal Proceedings

There is no material litigation, arbitration or governmental proceeding currently pending against us or any members of our management team in their capacity as such.

​

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information about our directors and executive officers.

​

​

Biographies

Douglas M. Polinsky:  Mr. Polinsky co-founded Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. in January 2006 and since that time has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the company. Since 1994, Mr. Polinsky has been the President of Great North Capital Consultants, Inc., a financial advisory and investment company that he founded. Great North Capital Consultants, Inc. primarily engages in the business of investing in hard money lending with collateral on the loans being first or second mortgages in both residential and commercial properties. In addition, Great North Capital Consultants, Inc. makes direct investments into public and private companies. Since 2015, Mr. Polinsky has been an independent director of Liberated Syndication, Inc., a Nevada corporation with its operations in Pennsylvania. Liberated Syndication, Inc. is a host and publisher of podcasts. Mr. Polinsky is a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Liberated Syndication. Mr. Polinsky earned a Bachelor of Science degree in hotel administration at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in 1981.

Joseph A. Geraci, II: Mr. Geraci co-founded Mill City Ventures III, Ltd in January 2006 and has been a director and the Chief Financial Officer of the company since that time. Since February 2002 through the present time, Mr. Geraci has been managing member of Isles Capital, LLC, an advisory and consulting firm that assists small businesses, both public and private, in business development. In March 2005, Mr. Geraci also became the managing member of Mill City Advisors, LLC, the general partner of Mill City Ventures, LP, and Mill City Ventures II, LP, each a Minnesota limited partnership that invested directly into both private and public companies. From January 2005 until August 2005, Mr. Geraci served as the Director of Finance for Gelstat Corporation, a purveyor of homeopathic remedies, based in Bloomington, Minnesota. Mr. Geraci provided investment advice to clients as a stockbroker and Vice President of Oak Ridge Financial Services, Inc., a Minneapolis-based broker-dealer firm, from June 2000 to December 2004. While at Oak Ridge Financial Services, Mr. Geraci’s business was focused on structuring and negotiating debt and equity private placements with both private and publicly held companies. Mr. Geraci was employed at another Minneapolis-based brokerage firms from July 1991 to June 2000. From his career and investment experiences, Mr. Geraci has established networks of colleagues, clients, co-investors, and the officers and directors of public and private companies. These networks offer a range of contacts across a number of sectors and companies that may provide opportunities for investment, including many that meet the company’s screening criteria.

In August 2003, the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) found in an administrative hearing that Mr. Geraci, while employed by and affiliated with a NASD member, had violated NASD Conduct Rule 2110 and SEC Rule 10b-5 in August 1999, and barred him from associating with any NASD member in the future.

Howard P. Liszt: Mr. Liszt served as Chief Executive Officer of Campbell Mithun, a national marketing communications agency he joined in 1976, until 2001. Under his leadership, Campbell Mithun grew to be one of the 20 largest agencies in the world. He currently serves on the board of : Eggland’s Best. Mr. Liszt has served as a Board member for several industry-leading companies including Land O’ Lakes, ShuffleMaster, Ocular Sciences, and Coleman Natural Foods. Mr. Liszt holds a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Marketing and a Masters of Science in Marketing from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Lyle A. Berman: Mr. Berman is a 1964 graduate of the University of Minnesota with a degree in Business Administration. Mr. Berman began his career with Berman Buckskin, his family’s leather business. He helped grow the business into a major specialty retailer with 27 outlets. In 1990, Mr. Berman participated in the founding of Grand Casinos, Inc. Mr. Berman is credited as one of the early visionaries in the development of casinos outside of the traditional gaming markets of Las Vegas and Atlantic City. In less than five years, the company opened eight casino resorts in four states. In 1994, Mr. Berman financed the initial development of Rainforest

Cafe. He served as the Chairman and CEO from 1994 until 2000. In October 1995, Mr. Berman was honored with the B’nai B’rith “Great American Traditions Award.” In April 1996, he received the Gaming Executive of the Year Award; in 2004, Mr. Berman was inducted into the Poker Hall of Fame; and in 2009, he received the Casino Lifetime Achievement Award from Raving Consulting & Casino Journal. In 1998, Lakes Entertainment, Inc. was formed. In 2002, as Chairman of the Board and CEO of Lakes Entertainment, Inc., Mr. Berman was instrumental in creating the World Poker Tour. Since January 2005, Mr. Berman has also served as Chairman of the Board of Pokertek, Inc.

Laurence S. Zipkin: Mr. Zipkin is nationally recognized for his expertise in the gaming industry, restaurants, and emerging small growth companies. From 1996 to 2006, Mr. Zipkin owned Oakridge Securities, Inc. where, as an investment banker, he successfully raised capital for various early growth-stage companies and advising clients with regard to private placements, initial public offerings, mergers, debt offerings, bridge and bank financings, developing business plans and evaluating cash needs and resources. He has extensive experience in the merger and acquisition field and has represented companies on both the buy and sell side. Since 2006, Mr. Zipkin has been self-employed, engaging in various consulting activities, owning and operating two restaurant properties, and purchasing distressed real estate. Mr. Zipkin is a licensed insurance agent for both life and health insurance. Mr. Zipkin attended the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Finance.

Under the company’sCompany’s bylaws, the directors serve for indefinite terms expiring upon the next annual meeting of the company’s shareholders.

When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills to enable the board of directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the company’s business and structure, the board of directors focuses primarily on the industry and transactional experience, and other background, in addition to any unique skills or attributes associated with a director. With regard to Messrs. Polinsky and Geraci, the board of directors considered their significant experience, expertise and background with regard to investing in general and the company in particular. With regard to Mr. Berman, the board of directors considered his background and experience with the public securities markets and his former employment and experience in operational capacities. With regard to Mr. Liszt, the board of directors considered his experience on other boards of public companies, his past experience in the communications and advertising fields, and his organizational experience. With regard to Mr. Zipkin, the board of directors considered his knowledge, experience and skills in the finance, public securities and investment banking fields.

Term of Office

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Company’s Bylawsbylaws provide that the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors will consist of no less than three members. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Boardboard of Directors.directors.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or officers, or persons nominated or chosen to be a director or officer. Other than as described above, we are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executive officers or directors.

Director Independence

As of the closing of this offering, the Board will have reviewed the independence of our directors based on the listing standards of Nasdaq. At present, our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Zipkin, Liszt and Berman qualify as independent directors in accordance with the published listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market. The Nasdaq independence definition includes a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not, and has not been for at least three years, one of our employees and that neither the director, nor any of his family members has engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, our board of directors has not made a subjective determination as to each director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of our board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, though such subjective determination is required by Nasdaq rules. Had our board of directors made these determinations, our board of directors would have reviewed and discussed information provided by the directors and us with regard to each director’s business and personal activities and relationships as they may relate to us and our management.

Limitation on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Our articles of incorporation will provide that our officers and directors will be indemnified by us to the fullest extent authorized by Minnesota law, as it now exists or may in the future be amended. In addition, our articles of incorporation provide that our directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages to us or our shareholders for breaches of their fiduciary duty as directors, unless they violated their duty of loyalty to us or our shareholders, acted in bad faith, knowingly or intentionally violated the law, authorized unlawful payments of dividends, unlawful stock purchases or unlawful redemptions, or derived an improper personal benefit from their actions as directors.

Our indemnification obligations may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our officers and directors, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. Furthermore, a shareholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

We believe that these provisions are necessary to attract and retain talented and experienced officers and directors.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

Board Committees

Each of our independent directors, Laurence S. Zipkin, Howard P. Liszt and Lyle A. Berman, will serve on each committee. Our Board will adopt written charters for each of these committees. Upon completion of this offering, copies of the charters will be available on our website. Our Board may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.

Audit Committee

The audit committee will be responsible for, among other matters:

​

​

Mr. Berman will serve as chairman of our audit committee. As of the closing of this offering, the Board will have reviewed the independence of our directors based on the listing standards of the Nasdaq. Based on this review, the Board shall have determined that that each of Messrs. Zipkin, Liszt and Berman meet the definition of “independent director” for purposes of serving on an audit committee under Rule 10A-3 and the Nasdaq rules. Moreover, of the directors presently serving on the board, Messrs. Berman, Liszt and Zipkin are “independent” as that term is defined in Section 4200(a)(15) of National Association of Securities Dealers’ listing

standards. This conclusion is based upon information requested from each such director concerning his background, employment and affiliations.

Our board of directors will determine that Mr. Berman qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee

The compensation committee will be responsible for, among other matters:

​

​

Mr. Liszt will serve as chairman of our compensation committee.

​

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The purpose of the nominating and corporate governance committee is to assist the board in identifying qualified individuals to become board members, in determining the composition of the board, in monitoring the process to assess board effectiveness, in conducting annual reviews of corporate governance matters and in making related recommendations to the board of directors and its committees. Mr. Liszt will serve as chairman of our nominating and corporate governance committee.

Board Leadership Structure

Currently, Mr. Polinsky is our principal executive officer and chairman of the board of directors.

Risk Oversight

Our Board will oversee a company-wide approach to risk management. Our Board will determine the appropriate risk level for us generally, assess the specific risks faced by us and review the steps taken by management to manage those risks. While our Board will have ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, its committees will oversee risk in certain specified areas.

Specifically, our compensation committee will be responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive compensation plans and arrangements, and the incentives created by the compensation awards it administers. Our audit committee will oversee management of enterprise risks and financial risks, as well as potential conflicts of interests. Our board of directors will be responsible for overseeing the management of risks associated with the independence of our board of directors.

Controlled Company Exemption

After the completion of this offering, five of our shareholders presently holding as a group 63.42% of our issued and outstanding stock may be deemed to control in excess of 50% of the voting power of our common stock, and as a result, we may be deemed to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq.  Under these corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance standards, including the requirements (1) that a majority of our board of directors consists of independent directors, (2) that our board of directors has a compensation committee that is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities and (3) that our board of directors has a nominating/corporate governance committee that is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities.

If we were to rely on any of the above-stated exemptions, you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of these corporate governance requirements. However, whether or not we are deemed to be a “controlled company”

following this offering, we do not intend to utilize any of the corporate governance exemptions for a “controlled company”. Furthermore, in the event that we are not found to be a “controlled company” and our shares continue to be listed on the Nasdaq, we will be required to comply with these Nasdaq corporate governance standards.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors adopted a Code of Ethics on August 5, 2008, and revised March 6, 2013 in connection with our election to become a BDC. The Code of Ethics includes or covers our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as required by Sections 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We formally revised the Code of Ethics again in March 2021, to reflect the withdrawal of our BDC election. Our Code of Ethics is available at our website, www.millcityventures3.com, or without charge, to any shareholder upon written request made to Mill City Ventures III, Ltd., Attention: Chief Executive Officer, 1907 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 205, Wayzata, MN 55391.

​

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

As of DecemberMarch 31, 2021,2022, we had no outstanding options, warrants or other rights to purchase any equity securities of the Company under any equity compensation plan or “individual compensation arrangement,” as defined in Item 201 of Regulation S-K. Furthermore, as of the date of this filing, we are not a party to any equity compensation plan, nor are we obligated under any “individual compensation arrangement” to issue any options, warrants, rights or other securities. We are not required by applicable state law or the listing standards of any self-regulatory agency (e.g., the OTCQX, NASD, AMEX or NYSE) to obtain the approval of our security holders prior to issuing any such compensatory options, warrants or other rights to purchase securities of the Company.

In August 2020, the Compensation Committee approved, and the Company issued, 50,000 shares of restricted stock to each of Mr. Douglas M. Polinsky and Joseph A. Geraci, II. The shares vested on the one-year anniversary of their issuance and until such time are subject to forfeiture. In April 2022, the Compensation Committee approved, and the Company issued, an aggregate of 65,000 shares of restricted stock to all directors (15,000 shares to each independent director, and 10,000 shares to each non-independent director), which shares will remain subject to forfeiture in the event of termination of service through the one-year anniversary of their issuance.

​

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with Related Persons and Certain Conflict Disclosures

Our board of directors has adopted a Conflict of Interest and Related Party Transaction Policy to require our disclosure of related person transactions and certain other conflicts in our periodic filings with the SEC. Our related-person transactions requiring disclosure under this policy are as follows:

During fiscal 2020 through March 31, 2022, the largest aggregate amount of principal outstanding under the above-described lending arrangement with Ms. Zbikowski was $250,000, which remains the amount outstanding as of May 26, 2022.  During that same time period, the debtor has paid no principal amount owing under the promissory note, but has paid an aggregate of $56,250 in interest thereunder, of which $25,000 was paid in 2020, $25,000 was paid in 2021, and $6,250 was paid in the first quarter of 2022.

As a Lender, Mr. Berman is obligated to furnish only one-half of the aggregate $5 million available under the Loan Agreement. The Loan Agreement has a five-year term ending on January 3, 2027, at which time all amounts owing under the Loan Agreement will become due and payable; subject, however, to each Lender’s right, including Mr. Berman, to terminate the Loan Agreement, solely with respect to such Lender’s obligation to provide further credit, at any time after January 3, 2023. In the event that a Lender, including Mr. Berman, terminates its lending obligations, the Loan Agreement requires that we repay such Lender, prior to the five-year maturity date, with the proceeds derived from specified investments.

The Loan Agreement provides for us to pay a quarterly unused commitment fee equal to one-quarter of one percent of the amount of credit available but unused under the Loan Agreement, and requires us to pay such fee in the form of shares of our common stock based on our net asset value per share on the last day of the applicable fiscal quarter. The Loan Agreement grants the Lenders piggyback registration rights subject to customary terms, conditions and exceptions. The Loan Agreement contains other provisions, such as representations, warranties, terms and conditions, that are customary for revolving credit facilities. Promissory notes, evidencing amounts owing under the Loan Agreement and conforming to the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement, were also executed by us and delivered to the Lenders as contemplated under the Loan Agreement.

From the date of the Loan Agreement, January 3, 2022, through March 31, 2022, the largest aggregate amount of principal outstanding under the above-described borrowing arrangement with the Lenders was $5,325,000, and the amount outstanding under the Loan Agreement as of May 26, 2022 was $1,325,000 after giving effect to a $4,000,000 principal payment we made to the Lenders on April 20, 2022 (which is all of the principal we have paid under the Loan Agreement). Since the date of the Loan Agreement through March 31, 2022, we paid an aggregate of $70,059 in interest owing thereunder.

Related-Party Transaction Policy

The board of directors has adopted a written Conflict of Interest and Related Party Transaction Policy. That policy governs the approval of all related-party transactions, subject only to certain customary exceptions (e.g., compensation, certain charitable donations, transactions made available to all employees generally, etc.). The policy contains a minimum dollar threshold of $5,000.

The entire board of directors administers the policy and approves any related-party transactions. In general, after full disclosure of all material facts, review and discussion, the board approves or disapproves related-party transactions by a vote of a majority of the directors who have no interest in such transaction, direct or indirect. Procedurally, no director is allowed vote in any approval of a related-party transaction for which he or she is the related party, except that such a director may otherwise participate in a related discussion and shall provide to the board all material information concerning the related-party transaction and the director’s interest therein. If a related-party transaction will be ongoing, the board may establish guidelines for management to follow in its ongoing dealings with the related party.

​

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth certain information, as of February 11,July 13, 2022, with respect to any person (including any “group”, as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of any class of our voting securities, and as to those shares of our equity securities beneficially owned by each of our directors and executive officers and all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated in the table or its footnotes, the business address of each of the following persons or entities is 1907 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 205, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391, and each such person or entity has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock set forth opposite their respective name.

Unless otherwise specified in the table below, such information, other than information with respect to our directors and executive officers, is based on a review of statements filed with the Securities and Exchange commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Sections 13 (d), 13 (f), and 13 (g) of the Exchange Act with respect to our common stock.

The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person is determined under the rules of the Commission and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which such person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within sixty (60) days after the date hereof, through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole investment and voting power (or shares such power with his or her spouse) with respect to the shares set forth in the following table. The inclusion herein of any shares deemed beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares.

The following table lists, as at the date hereof, the number of shares of our common stock that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using “beneficial ownership” concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.

​We expect to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at an assumed 1-for-2.25 ratio to occur immediately following the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part but prior to the closing of the offering. Share information in the table below gives effect to our planned reverse stock split.