As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2023

Registration Statement No. 333-333-269737______

AS FILED WITH THE UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONON OCTOBER17, 2018

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549FORM S-1/A

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

Giga-tronics Incorporated
GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED 

GIGA TRONICS INC

(Exact name of Registrantregistrant as specified in its charter)

 

California

3825

94-2656341

(State or other jurisdictionOther Jurisdiction of

of incorporationIncorporation or
organization) Organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)Number)

 

5990 Gleason Drive7272 E. Indian School Road, Suite 540

Dublin, California 94568Scottsdale, AZ85251

Telephone: 925-328-4650(833) 457-6667

(Address, Including Zip Code, and telephone numberTelephone Number, Including Area Code, of principal executive offices)Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

 

John R. Regazzi
Jonathan Read

Chief Executive Officer
5990 Gleason Drive
Dublin, California 94568
Telephone: 925-328-4650

7272 E. Indian School Road, Suite 540

Scottsdale, AZ85251

(833) 457-6667

(Name, addressAddress, Including Zip Code, and telephone numberTelephone Number, Including Area Code, of agent for service)

Copy to:

David J. Gershon, Esq.

Thomas G. Reddy, Esq.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter and Hampton LLP

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 434-9100Agent For Service)

 

Copies to:

Michael D. Harris, Esq.

Edward H. Schauder, Esq.

Constantine Christakis, Esq.

Nason, Yeager, Gerson, Harris &

Fumero, P.A.

3001 PGA Blvd., Suite 305

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410

(561) 471-3507

Henry Nisser, Esq.

President and General Counsel

Ault Alliance, Inc.

100 Park Avenue, Suite 1658

New York, New York 10017

Tel.: (646) 650-5044

Approximate Datedate of Commencementcommencement of Proposed Saleproposed sale to the Public:public:

As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.Registration Statement.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.

x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.


¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

¨

Accelerated filer

¨
 

Non-accelerated filer

x

Smaller reporting company

x
 
   

Emerging growth company

 ¨

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act Act.

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class of

Securities to be Registered

 

Shares to be

Registered (1)

 

 

  

Proposed

Maximum

Aggregate

Offering Price

per Security

   

Proposed

Maximum

Aggregate

Offering

Price

  

Amount of

Registration

Fee

 

Shares of Common Stock underlying Preferred Stock (2)

  7,000,000  $0.25 

(3)

 $1,750,000  $212.10 

Shares of Common Stock underlying Warrants (4)

  2,026,887  $0.25 

(3)

 $506,722  $61.41 

Shares of Common Stock underlying Warrants (4)

  898,634  $1.78 

(3)

 $1,599,569  $193.87 

Shares of Common Stock underlying Warrants (4)

  194,437  $1.76 

(3)

 $342,209  $41.48 

Shares of Common Stock underlying Warrants (4)

  331,636  $1.15 

(3)

 $381,381  $46.22 

Common Stock, no par value (5)

  1,172,858  $0.31 

(6)

 $363,586  $44.07 

TOTAL

  11,624,452       $4,943,467  $599.15 

(1)

Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), the shares of common stock being registered hereunder include such indeterminate number of shares of common stock as may be issuable with respect to the shares of common stock being registered hereunder as a result of stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions.

(2)

Shares issuable upon conversion of outstanding shares of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock.

(3)

Pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Act, the offering price is based upon the respective average exercise or conversion price.

(4)

Shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants.

(5)

Represents 600,000 shares of common stock potentially issuable as payment-in-kind dividends on the outstanding shares of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock and 572,858 shares of outstanding common stock issued upon exercise of warrants.

(6)

Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee and based on the average of the high and low sales prices of our common stock OTC Bulletin Board of $0.31 on October 15, 2018 pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.determine.

Explanatory Note

 

In this Prospectus, we refer to Giga-tronics, Inc. as Gresham Worldwide which is a fictitious name we have filed in Arizona and California. When we use the name Giga-tronics, we refer to our Giga-tronics Division which is not a separate subsidiary. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Gresham Holdings, Inc., (formerly Gresham Worldwide, Inc.) is referred to as “Gresham” or “GWW”. In this Prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Gresham Worldwide and its wholly-owned subsidiaries or the combined company.

Outstanding share numbers after this offering, the number of shares being registered hereunder and the related ownership percentages are calculated based on the assumption that the interest payable in certain convertible notes will be paid in cash and there will be no cashless exercise of certain outstanding warrants. If shares will be issued in lieu of interest, the Company will be obligated to register the conversion shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). If holder of our warrants exercises their warrants on a cashless basis, fewer shares of our common stock will be outstanding after such exercise. 


 

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling securityholdersNo shares of common stock may not sell these securitiesbe sold until the registration statementRegistration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities andnor does it is not solicitingseek an offer to buy these securitiesshares of common stock in any state or jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

DATED Subject to Completion dated July 31, 2023OCTOBER 17, 2018

 

11,624,452

 

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED

70,077,753 Shares of Common Stock

 

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED7272 E. Indian School Road, Suite 540

Scottsdale, AZ 85251

(833) 457-6667

This prospectus relates to the saledistribution of 6,880,128 shares of common stock, no par value per share of Giga-tronics Incorporated, a California corporation (the “Company”), to be distributed as a dividend payable to the shareholders of record of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Ault Alliance, Inc. (“AAI”), at the close of business on [_______], 2023, the record date for the distribution, on the basis of ___ share of the Company’s common stock for approximately every ___ shares of AAI common stock, owned of record at the close of business on that date (the “Distribution”). No fractional shares of the Company’s common stock will be issued in the Distribution. In lieu of receiving fractional shares, holders who would otherwise be entitled to receive fractional shares of the Company’s common stock in the Distribution will receive cash for their fractional interests. For AAI stockholders who own AAI common stock in registered form, in most cases the transfer agent, acting as the distribution agent, will credit their shares of the Company’s common stock to book-entry accounts established to hold the Company’s common stock. The distribution agent will mail these shareholders a statement reflecting the Company’s common stock ownership following the Distribution. For shareholders who own AAI common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee, their shares of the Company’s common stock will be credited to their accounts by that broker, bank or other nominee.

This Prospectus also relates to the offering and resale by the selling securityholders named in this prospectusshareholders identified herein (the “Selling Securityholders”Shareholders”) of up to 11,624,45263,197,625 shares of our common stock which consists of Giga-tronics Incorporated (we, the “Company” or “Giga-tronics”), including 7,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, which we refer to as “Series E Shares,” 3,451,594 shares of common stock issuable uponcertain notes and the exercise of common stock purchasecertain warrants 572,858in connection with our recent financing transactions (the “PIPE Securities”). The prices at which these shares of common stock that we issued upon exercise of warrantsmay be offered and 600,000 shares of common stock potentially issuable as dividends onsold to the Series E Shares. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the salepublic by the Selling SecurityholdersShareholders may be determined based on a variety of such securities. However, we will receive proceeds from the exercisepotential methods as described under “Determination of the warrants if they are exercisedOffering Price” at page 88 and “Plan of Distribution” at page 52. See also “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Our Recent Financings.” and “Selling Shareholders” for cash by the Selling Securityholders. We will bear all expenses of registration incurred in connection with this offering, but all selling and other expenses incurred by the selling shareholders will be borne by them.more information.

 

Our Common Stockcommon stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin BoardOTCQB, under the symbol GIGA.QB. The high“GIGA.” On July 26, 2023, the closing price per share of our common stock as reported by the OTCQB was $0.37 per share. See “Trading and low bid prices forDividend Information.”

The shares of our Common Stock on October 15, 2018, were $0.37the Company’s common stock, which are the subject of the Distribution are being registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), and $0.25 per share, respectively, based upon bids that represent prices quotedAAI is deemed by broker-dealers on the OTC Bulletin Board. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.SEC to be an underwriter with respect to the Distribution.

 

The Selling SecurityholdersShareholders may sell the PIPE Securities described in this Prospectus in a number of different ways and any broker-dealers that participateat varying prices. The prices at which the Selling Shareholders may sell the PIPE Securities in this offering will be determined by the distributionprevailing market price for the shares of our common stock or in negotiated transactions. See “Plan of Distribution” for more information about how the securitiesSelling Shareholders may sell the PIPE Securities being registered pursuant to this Prospectus. Each Selling Shareholder may be deemed to be “underwriters” as that term is defined inan “underwriter” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(11) of the Securities ActAct. The Selling Shareholders have informed us that they do not currently have any agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the PIPE Securities.

We have agreed to pay the expenses of 1933,the registration of the shares of our common stock offered and sold under the Registration Statement under the Distribution and by the Selling Shareholders. Each Selling Shareholder will pay any commissions and applicable to the PIPE Securities it sells as amended.will AAI stockholders who receive common stock as part of the Distribution.

________________

 

Investing in our common stock is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning onShareholders Should Be Aware Of Certain Risks Related To The Ownership Of The Company’s Common Stock. See “Risk Factors.” Beginning at page 118. of this prospectus before making a decision to purchase our common stock.

________________

 

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESETHE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ACCURACYDETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS.COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

 

The date of this prospectusProspectus is ______ ___, 2023.

October 17, 2018.TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


PAGE
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY1
RISK FACTORS8
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS30
THE DISTRIBUTION30
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE DISTRIBUTION33
USE OF PROCEEDS37
CAPITALIZATION37
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS38
SELLING SHAREHOLDER50
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION52
BUSINESS53
MANAGEMENT71
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS79
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS80
DESCRIPTION OF GIGA-TRONICS’ SECURITIES82

TRADING AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

87

DIVIDEND POLICY

87

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

88
LEGAL MATTERS88
EXPERTS88
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION88
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-1

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

In this prospectus, unless the context suggests otherwise, unless otherwise noted, referencesNo person is authorized to “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Giga-tronics Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries.

This prospectus describes the specific details regarding this offering and the terms and conditions of the common stock being offered hereby and the risks of investing in our common stock. You should read this prospectus,give any free writing prospectus and the additional information about us described in the section entitled ‘‘Where You Can Find More Information’’ before making your investment decision.

Neither we, nor any of our officers, directors, agents or representatives make any representation not contained in this Prospectus and, if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to you about the legalitysell, or a solicitation of an investmentoffer to purchase, the securities offered by this prospectus, or an offer or solicitation to any person in our common stock. You should not interpretany jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful. Neither the contentsdelivery of this prospectus to be legal, business, investmentnor any exchange or tax advice. You should consult with your own advisors forsale hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that typethere has been no change in the information contained herein or in the affairs of advice and consult with them about the legal, tax, business, financial and other issues that you should consider before investing in our common stock.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Company since the date as of which information is furnished or the date hereof. You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus and in any accompanying prospectus supplement. No one has beenProspectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different or additional information.from that contained in this Prospectus. The shares of common stockSelling Shareholders are not being offeredoffering to sell or seeking offers to buy securities in any jurisdictionjurisdictions where the offer isoffers and sales are not permitted. You should not assumeWe are responsible for updating this Prospectus to ensure that all material information is included and will update this Prospectus to the extent required by law.

________________

Market, Industry and Other Data

Unless otherwise indicated, information in this prospectus or any prospectus supplementProspectus concerning economic conditions, our industry, our markets, and our competitive position is accurate asbased on a variety of any date other thansources, including information from third-party industry analysts and publications and our own estimates and research. Some of the dateindustry and market data contained in this Prospectus are based on the frontthird-party industry publications. This information involves a number of such documents.assumptions, estimates and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to these estimates.

 

TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMESThe industry publications, surveys and forecasts and other public information generally indicate or suggest that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. None of the third-party industry publications used in this Prospectus were prepared on our behalf. The industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in this Prospectus.” These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in these publications.

i
Table of Contents

Trademarks

 

This prospectus includesProspectus contains references to our trademarks which are protected under applicable intellectual property laws and are our property or the property of our subsidiaries. This prospectus also contains trademarks, service marks trade names and/ or copyrights ofand to those belonging to other companies, which are the property of their respective owners.entities. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this prospectusProspectus may appear without the ® or TM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent possible under applicable law, our rights or the rightrights of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trade names, trademarks or service marks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by any other companies.

 

ii
Table of Contents

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

 

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this prospectus concerning our industry and the markets in which we operate, including market position and market opportunity, is based on information from our management’s estimates, as well as from industry publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. The third-party sources from which we have obtained information generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we cannot assure you that this information is accurate or complete. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources nor have we verified the underlying economic assumptions relied upon by those third parties. However, assumptions and estimates of our future performance, and the future performance of our industry, are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including those described under the heading “Risk Factors” in this prospectus and those described elsewhere in this prospectus, and the other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, from time to time. These and other important factors could result in our estimates and assumptions being materially different from future results. You should read the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this prospectus completely and with the understanding that future results may be materially different and worse from what we expect. See the information included under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements.”

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTSPROSPECTUS SUMMARY

 

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements.  These statements relate to future events or future predictions, including events or predictions relating to our future financial performance, and are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about us, our future performance, our beliefs and management’s assumptions.  They are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “feel,” “confident,” “estimate,” “intend,” “predict,” “forecast,” “project,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.  These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks described under “Risk Factors” that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  In addition to the risks described in Risk Factors, important factors to consider and evaluate in such forward-looking statements include: (i) general economic conditions and changes in the external competitive market factors which might impact our results of operations; (ii) unanticipated working capital or other cash requirements including those created by our failure to adequately anticipate the costs associated with product development and other critical activities; (iii) changes in our corporate strategy or an inability to execute our strategy due to unanticipated changes; and (iv) our failure to complete any or all sales or shipments of products or on the terms currently contemplated.  In light of these risks and uncertainties, many of which are described in greater detail elsewhere in the section titled Risk Factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus will in fact transpire.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date of this prospectus, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.  We will update or revise the forward-looking statements to the extent required by applicable law.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

6

THE OFFERING

8

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE

9

RISK FACTORS

10

USE OF PROCEEDS

15

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

15

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

16

BUSINESS

30

MANAGEMENT

42

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

46

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

49

CHANGE IN ACCOUNTANTS

49

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

50

SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

51

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

54

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

55

LEGAL MATTERS

58

EXPERTS

59

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

59

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

The following summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary mayProspectus or incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and does not contain all of the information that may be importantyou should consider before deciding to you. Youinvest in our securities. Before investing in our securities, you should carefully read this entire prospectus carefully,Prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference in this Prospectus, including the consolidated financial statements of Gresham and the related notes thereto and the information set forth under the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our historical financial statements and related notesOperations,” in each case included elsewhere in this prospectus and incorporated hereby by reference. In this prospectus, unless otherwise noted or the context requires, the terms “Company,” “Giga-tronics Incorporated,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Giga-tronics Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries.Prospectus.

 

TheOur Company

 

We are engaged in three groups serving primarily the global defense industry – the Precision Electronic Solutions group, the Radio Frequency (“RF”) Solutions Group and the Power Electronics and Display Solutions Group. We design, manufacture, and distribute specialized electronic solutions, automated test solutions, power electronics, equipmentsupply and distribution solutions, display solutions and radio, microwave and millimeter wave communication systems and components for usea variety of applications with a focus on the global defense industry for military airborne, sea and ground applications including high fidelity signal simulation and recording solutions for Electronic Warfare (“EW”) test and training applications. We also offer bespoke technology solutions for mission critical applications in military defense applications. Our operations consistthe medical, industrial, transportation and telecommunications markets.

Business Combination

On September 8, 2022, we acquired Gresham, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of two business segments, thoseAult Alliance, Inc. (“AAI”). Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Gresham and, in exchange, the Company issued AAI 2,920,085 shares of the Company’s common stock and 514.8 shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series F”) that were convertible into an aggregate of 3,960,043 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to potential adjustments, and the assumption of Gresham’s outstanding equity awards representing, on an as-assumed basis, 749,626 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Business Combination”). The parties had previously entered into a Share Exchange Agreement dated December 27, 2021 (the “Agreement”) for which the Company obtained the requisite stockholder approval on September 8, 2022.

Prior to the Distribution, AAI will convert all of the Series F into shares of the Company’s common stock, and as a result, will beneficially own 69.6% of the Company’s outstanding shares as of such date (excluding shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes and exercise of certain warrants described elsewhere in this Prospectus). However, we expect that the Distribution will occur on [  ], 2023 which we refer to as the “Distribution Date.”

Immediately following the completion of the Business Combination, Gresham became our wholly-owned subsidiary. We have changed our subsidiary MicrosourceGresham’s name to Gresham Holdings, Inc. (“Microsource”) and thoseIn connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, Gresham was deemed to be the accounting acquirer in the Business Combination based on an analysis of the criteria outlined in Accounting Standards Codification 805. While we were the legal acquirer in the Business Combination, because Gresham was deemed the accounting acquirer, the historical financial statements of Gresham became the historical financial statements of the combined company, upon the consummation of the Business Combination.

1
Table of Contents

After giving effect to the Business Combination, our Giga-tronics Division.current corporate structure is as follows: 

 

Microsource 

 

Microsource develops YIG (Yttrium, Iron, Garnet) tuned oscillators, filters, and microwave synthesizers for use in military defense applications. Microsource’s two largest customers are prime contractors for which we develop and manufacture YIG RADAR filters used in fighter jet aircrafts. Revenues from Microsource comprised a majority of our revenues for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017.

*Tabard Holdings, Inc. is an inactive corporation which owns Relec Electronics Ltd. (“Relec”)

 

Giga-tronics DivisionOur Industry

 

Our Giga-tronics Division designs, manufacturesoperations focus almost exclusively on the market for electronic solutions that support the defense industry and marketsother mission critical applications. The essential nature of these applications provides a familydegree of functional test products for the RADAR and electronic warfare, or RADAR/EW, segmentinsulation from volatility associated with other segments of the global economy while accounting for stability and steady growth of the addressable market opportunities available in segments that we serve. Demand for solutions to meet these requirements continues unaffected, and in many instances increases, in times of global crisis. Total defense electronics market.spending in the three countries in which we currently operate is estimated to total more than an estimated $836 billion in 2023 (https://www.globalfirepower.com/defense-spending-budget.asp). For more information see “Business - Our RADAR/EW test products are used to evaluate the performance of RADAR and Electronic Warfare, or EW, systems. Giga-tronics Division customers include major prime defense contractors, the United States armed services and research institutes.

Corporate OfficesIndustry”.

 

Our principal executive offices are located at 5990 Gleason Drive, Dublin, California and our telephone number at that location is (925) 328-4650. Our website address is http://www.Giga-tronics.com.

Our History

Giga-tronics was incorporated on March 5, 1980. Our original product line consisted of general purpose parametric test products used for the design, production, repair and maintenance of products in the aerospace and telecommunications equipment marketplace. In 1998 we acquired Microsource, which develops YIG tuned oscillators, filters and microwave synthesizers for use in RADAR applications.

We believe the functional RADAR/EW test market offers greater long-term opportunities for revenue growth and improved gross margins compared to the general purpose parametric test equipment marketplace. Beginning in 2011, we chose to focus on the development of RADAR/EW defense industry products. Using technological resources and industry expertise related to RADAR developed within our Microsource division, we began to develop products for RADAR/EW test applications, which together comprise our Advanced Signal Generation and Analysis (“ASGA”) systems. We also sold or eliminated the substantial majority of our original general purpose test products between 2013 and 2016 because of lack of growth potential and poor gross margins. For example, we sold our SCPM product line in 2013; we sold our Power Meters and Amplifiers business in 2015; and we sold our Switch product line to Astronics in 2016.Business Strengths

 

We have experienced significant operating losses. Developing the ASGA product platform was more expensive and took more timefollowing core strengths that we anticipated, and the operating revenue of our Giga-tronics Division decreased as we exited our legacy test equipment businesses. We have, however, continued to see increasing operating revenue from sales of Microsource’s RADAR filter products as our customers upgraded the fighter jets’ RADAR systems under the United States Government’s RADAR Modernization Program for prior generation fighter aircraft such as the F/A-18E, F-15D and F-16 jets. In addition to providing cash to help fund the development of the ASGA product platform, the sale of our legacy general-purpose test product lines has allowedbelieve give us to significantly reduce our headcount and operating expenses. For example, our operating expenses for fiscal 2018 were 15% lower than those for the 2017 fiscal year and 30% lower compared to the 2016 fiscal year.a competitive advantage:

 


·High quality, ultra-reliable bespoke technology offerings with elegant designs and precision “high touch” manufacture that stand the test of time, narrow the field of competition and command enhanced operating margins.

·Enduring relationships with “blue chip” customers in the defense market with diversity in other growth markets such as health care, industrial, transportation and telecommunications provide stable revenue growth and reduce sales cost.

·A growing and substantial backlog of orders with definite delivery dates for solutions engineered into long life cycle platforms that provide revenue base for years to come. Global operations expand our market opportunities, extend our operational reach and diversify our business base.

 

We substantially completed the development our ASGA system and began shipping in 2016. Through March 31, 2018, we have delivered our new ASGA test systems to eight customers generating approximately $10 million in revenue.

CorporateOur Strategy

 

Our objectivegoal is to maintain our position as a sole provider of RADAR filter solutions for prior generations of fighter jet aircraft and become a leadingthe supplier of electronic test systems to government facilitieschoice for the major players in the defense industry and defense prime contractors tasked with evaluating the performance of RADAR/EW systems.

We believefor customers that several aspects of our Microwave Advanced Signal Generationaddress mission critical applications in health care, transportation, manufacturing, and Analysis (ASGA) simulation platform are unique. The platform interface is digital and may be customized and scaled with relative ease compared to traditional test systems.

To sell our new specialized testing products, we are changing our approach to sales. We are developing a field salesforce, locating personnel near key military and OEM customers within the RADAR/EW marketplace. This salesforce will have the technical expertise needed to properly understand our customers’ needs and provide the optimal solution to position our complex and innovative platform. Members of our salesforce have the security clearances required to enter classified facilities and to hold the necessary conversations with customers to understand their requirements.telecommunications.

 

Our customers include the US Navy, US Air Force and US Army and prime contractors and test directorates whonear-term strategies are focused on developing the devices being tested at military bases. We believe we have the opportunity to expand into new international markets with our functional RADAR/EW test solutions. To do so, we will rely on our relationships at key prime contractors and military customers in France, Israel, Italy and the United Kingdom, for example. We also expect to use sales representative organizations that have relationships with prime contractors and technical expertise in radar testing.

Microsource provides RADAR filter solutions for the F-15, F-16 and F-18 aircraft as their RADAR systems are upgraded. We expect that our filter technology will continue to be a significant source of our revenue because a number of these aircraft have yet to be upgraded. In addition, we may be able to sell our RADAR filters internationally as the RADAR systems of foreign forces’ F-15, F-16 and F-18 aircraft are upgraded. We may also have the opportunity to develop and sell RADAR filters to customers for other types of aircrafts. We may also deploy technology from our RADAR/EW test platform, miniaturized and ruggedized with our chip and wire technology, to provide additional Microwave modules to the prime contractors to whom we currently provide our test solutions.

Recent Developments

Going Concern

We have sustained recurring operating losses, raising substantial doubt about our ability to continuesynergies as a going concern. We incurred net lossesresult of $3.1 million in fiscal 2018, and $1.5 million in fiscal 2017. These losses have contributed to an accumulated deficitthe acquisition of $28.7 million as of March 31, 2018.

The Company’s financial statements for all periods have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon us reducing expenses, raising additional capital to fund future operations and recognizing revenue from sales and other factors, as discussed in Note 2 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 attached to this prospectus. We have utilized cash in operating activities of $1.6 million and $945,000 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and the three months ended June 30, 2018 and we had $748,000 cash on hand as of our most recently completed fiscal quarter, which ended June 30, 2018.


Sales of Series E Shares

We sold shares of our 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, or Series E Shares, on March 26, 2018 in a private placement discussed elsewhere in this prospectus of which $1.1 million (in gross proceeds) was received during March 2018 and $220,000 (in gross proceeds) was received during our first fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018, resulting in cash on hand of $1.5 million at March 31, 2018 and $748,000 of cash on hand as of June 30, 2018. Since June 30, 2018, we raised an additional $531,105 of capital through September 28, 2018 through additional sales of Series E Shares and the exercise of warrants to purchase our common stock.

THE OFFERINGGresham.

 

Shares

·Gresham incurred major overhead expenses being a subsidiary of a larger company. Giga-tronics incurred large expenses being a public company with very limited sales. We plan to combine the overhead functions and greatly reduce their costs especially with our recent layoffs.

2
Table of Contents

·Combine duplicate functions and reduce the costs for finance, human resources, information technology, security, and contracts management.

·Combine the RF solutions group into one division and reduce operating costs.

In addition, we are focused on securing sufficient working capital to execute on a substantial backlog of orders with definite delivery dates, take on additional significant orders and further improve access to capital resources. In January 2023, we closed a $3.3 million convertible note offering with the notes due in early October 2023.

Our long-term strategy includes the following key elements:

·maintain, strengthen and expand relationships with current customers, including by increasing on-time delivery, diversifying solutions offered and optimizing quality of solutions;

·attract new customers through building business development, marketing and sales infrastructure to raise market awareness, identify opportunities early in the process and design in optimally tailored offerings to provide customers competitive advantage;

·take advantage of the cross-selling opportunities among our operating subsidiaries to leverage current resources, reduce time to delivery, minimize selling costs and capitalize on strong customer relationships in other vertical market segments and geographies;

·enhance our geographic footprint by increasing marketing outreach, forming alliances with leading companies located in areas beyond our current reach and acquiring businesses that expand reach into other geographies and/or contiguous market sectors;

·transfer technology developed for mission critical defense applications to contiguous commercial markets with similar requirements for high quality, ultra-reliable solutions and invest in state-of-the-art technology to enhance its product offerings and production processes; and

·acquire complementary assets and businesses. We believe there are many small well run, profitable defense contractors whose principal owner is nearing retirement which could be attractive acquisition targets.

3
Table of Contents

Summary of the Offering

Issuer:Giga-tronics Incorporated, d/b/a Gresham Worldwide, a California corporation
Distribution by AAI6,880,128 shares of our common stock to AAI’s shareholders of record at the close of business on ______ __, 2023, the record date for the distribution (the “Record Date”), on the basis of ___ share of our common stock for approximately every ___ shares of AAI common stock, owned of record at the close of business on that date.  
Securities offered by the Selling Securityholders

Shareholders:
 

Up63,197,625 shares of our common stock, which we refer to 11,624,452as “PIPE Securities” issuable upon the conversion of certain notes and the exercise of certain warrants at an assumed conversion price and exercise price, as applicable, of $0.25 (with the exception of 2,000,000 warrants held by AAI exercisable at $0.01).  To the extent that the exercise price of certain warrants is lower than $0.25, the number of shares of common stock that are issuable tounderlying the Selling Securityholders. The Selling Securityholders may acquire these shares through the exercise of warrants the conversion of Series E Shares or as payment-in-kind dividends on our Series E Shares.  This total includes 572,858 shares that we recently issued upon exercise of warrants.

Shares of common stock outstanding (1)

 10,939,011

Shares of common stock outstanding assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares (2)

 26,654,514being offered hereby will be higher. See “Selling Shareholders” for more information.

   

TermsShares of common stock outstanding after the Offering

(1)
 

The Selling Securityholders will sell their shares at a prices based on the market price at the time of sale. The Selling Securityholders will determine when and how they sell the73,089,250 shares of common stock offered in this prospectus,based on 5,931,582 shares of common stock outstanding as described in “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 54.July 14, 2023, the Distribution of 6,880,128 Distribution Shares (which assumes the conversion by AAI of 514.8 shares of Series F into 3,960,043 shares of our common stock prior to the Distribution), and the conversion and exercise of all of the PIPE Securities and the related issuance of 63,197,625 shares of our common stock,

 

Use of Proceeds

proceeds:
 

We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of sharesthe Distribution Shares that will be distributed by AAI to its shareholders and the sale of the PIPE Securities being registered in this Prospectus by the Selling Securityholders. AnyShareholders. However, we will receive gross proceeds received fromupon the exercise of warrants or options by Selling Securityholders will be used by the Companyif exercised for working capital purposes.cash. See “Use of Proceeds.”

 

Dividend Policy

Risk factors:
 

We have never declared any cash dividends onInvesting in our common stock.  We currently intend to use all available funds and any future earnings for use in financing the growth of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.  See “Dividend Policy.”

Trading Symbol

GIGA

Risk Factors

An investment in the Company’s common stocksecurities involves a high degree of risk. Yourisk and purchasers of our securities may lose their entire investment. See “Risk Factors” and the other information included in this Prospectus for a discussion of risk factors you should carefully read the “Risk Factors” beginning on page 11consider before making an investment decision.

deciding to invest in our securities.

______

(1) The numberAssumes conversion price and exercise price of shares of common stock outstanding is based on 10,939,011 shares of common stock issued$0.25 (the floor price) for the various convertible notes and outstanding as of September 28, 2018 and does not includewarrants other than the following: 2,237,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, 3,451,594 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding2,000,000 warrants 8,853,351 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of all of our outstanding preferred shares, 572,858 shares recently issued upon exercise ofthat are exercisable by Ault Lending at $0.01. Also gives effect to a provision in certain warrants and 600,000 shares of common stock potentially issuable as dividends on the Series E Shares.

(2) Reflectswhich provides that the number of shares of common stock outstanding assumingunderlying such warrants will double if the conversion or exerciseCompany does not complete an uplist transaction by October 6, 2023. Excludes placement agent warrants to acquire 1,200,000 shares of our common stock and 749,626 shares issuable upon final vesting of and restricted stock units issued and stock options to purchase 2,237,700our executive management team and shares ofissuable under outstanding stock options.

Risk Factors

Our business and an investment in our common stock warrantsare subject to purchase 3,451,594 sharesnumerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section titled “Risk Factors” immediately following this Prospectus Summary. Some of common stock, 8,853,351 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of all of our outstanding preferred shares, 572,858 shares recently issued upon exercise of warrants, and 600,000 shares of common stock potentially issuable as dividends on the Series E Shares that were outstanding as of September 28, 2018.


INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE

The SEC allows use to “incorporate by reference” the information we have filed with the SEC, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information that the Company incorporates by reference is an important part of this prospectus, and information that it files later with the SEC will automatically update and supersede this information. The documents the Company is incorporating by reference are:these risks include:

 

·

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K forBecause of the year ended March 31, 2018 filed with the SEC on June 19, 2018;

number of Distribution Shares and PIPE Securities being registered in this Prospectus, holders of our common stock will experience substantial dilution.

 

·

We have doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 14, 2018;4

Table of Contents

·We have historically incurred net losses and negative cash flow and our operating results may significantly vary from quarter to quarter, so we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability.

 

·

Our Current ReportsBecause AAI intends to end its support, we will need additional capital to fund our operations, and our inability to generate or obtain such capital on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 9, 2018, August 20, 2018, August 29, 2018acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition, and September 24, 2018; and

prospects.

 

·

Because we require AAI’s consent and our noteholders’ consent for certain debt financings and acquisitions, we may not be able to pursue these transactions if AAI and our noteholders do not consent.

·

The descriptionintegration of our common stock includedand Gresham’s business and any future acquisitions may disrupt or have a negative impact on our business.

·If the inflationary pressures in the registration statementUnited States and elsewhere where we operate continue, we could experience reduced margins and lose future business.

·Our businesses are subject to government procurement laws and regulations.

·Our sales and profitability may be affected by changes in economic, business and industry conditions.

·Our sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our sales efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, our sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause our operating results to fluctuate significantly.

·Our sales are substantially dependent on Form 8-A filedthe defense industry and a limited number of customers.

·Because our competitors have greater resources, we may not compete effectively.

·If we lose key personnel, it could have a material adverse effect on July 31, 1984our financial condition, results of operations, and any amendmentgrowth prospects.

·The sale of our products is dependent upon our ability to satisfy the proprietary requirements of our customers.

·If we fail to anticipate and adequately respond to rapid technological changes in our industry, including evolving industry-wide standards, in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

·Performance problems in our products or report filedproblems arising from the use of our products together with other vendors’ products may harm our business and reputation.

·Our business could be negatively impacted by cybersecurity threats and other security threats and disruptions.

·Failure of our information technology infrastructure to operate effectively could adversely affect our business.

·Supply chain disruptions and our inability to procure necessary component part for our products have materially and adversely affected our results of operations and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations in the purposefuture.

·Because Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd. (“Enertec”) relied upon one customer for approximately 59% of updating such description.

its revenue in 2022, if it loses this customer or orders are materially reduced, it may have a material adverse effect on our revenues and operating results.

 

Additionally, all documents filed by us with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) after (i) the date of the initial registration statement and prior to effectiveness of the registration statement, and (ii) the date of this prospectus and before the termination or completion of any offering hereunder, shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus from the respective dates of filing of such documents, except that we do not incorporate any document or portion of a document that is “furnished” to the SEC, but not deemed “filed.”

·We may not be able to procure necessary key components for our products, or we may purchase too much inventory.

 

·If Gresham is unable to successfully expand its production capacity, it could result in material delays, quality issues, increased costs and loss of business opportunities, which may negatively impact our profit margins and operating results.

We will provide, without charge, to each person to whom a copy of this prospectus is delivered, including any beneficial owner, upon the written or oral request of such person, a copy of any or all of the documents incorporated by reference herein, including exhibits. Requests should be directed to: Attention: Investor Relations, 5990 Gleason Drive, Dublin, California 94568. The documents incorporated by reference may be accessed at our website at www.Giga-tronics.com.

·Gresham’s strategic focus on its custom electronics solution competencies and concurrent cost reduction plans may be ineffective or may limit its ability to compete.

5
Table of Contents

·Gresham faces intense industry competition and product obsolescence, which, in turn, could increase our losses.

·Gresham depends on a limited number of major customers for a significant portion of its revenue. The loss of any of these customers, or the substantial reduction in the quantity of products that they purchase from Gresham, would materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

·Gresham’s financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected by potential political, economic, and military instability in Israel.

·We may not achieve the benefits expected from the Distribution and may be more susceptible to adverse events.

·Because the Distribution and the sale of the PIPE Securities will significantly increase the number of free trading shares it is likely many AAI stockholders and the Selling Shareholders will sell their common stock which may depress our stock price.

 


·Our stock price may be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors and litigation.

 

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included or referred to in this prospectus, before purchasing shares of our common stock. There are numerous and varied risks that may prevent us from achieving our goals. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In such case, the tradingThe price of our common stock could decline and investors inmay have little or no relationship to the historical bid prices of our common stock could lose all or part of their investment.

Risks Relatedon the OTCQB. There is currently only a limited trading market for the Company’s common stock and there can be no assurance as to the Company’s Business

Our recurring operating losses have raised substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have sustained recurring operating losses, raising substantial doubt aboutextent of the trading market that will develop following the Distribution and the sale of our ability to continue as a going concern. We incurred net losses of $3.1 million in fiscal 2018, $1.5 million in fiscal 2017 and $287,000 forcommon stock by the quarter ended June 30, 2018. These losses have contributed to an accumulated deficit of $28.7 million as of March 31, 2018 and $27.8 million as of June 30, 2018.Selling Shareholders.

 

The Company’s financial statementsDistribution

The Distribution

The management of AAI, after extended study and analysis, has concluded that it is in the best interests of AAI and its shareholders for all periods have been prepared assumingAAI to divest a substantial portion of its interest in the Company will continueby distributing 6,880,128 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Distribution Shares”) that AAI acquired upon the completion of the Business Combination and the conversion of the Series F in the Distribution.

Reasons for the Distribution

See “The Distribution - Reasons for the Distribution.” AAI concluded that distributing shares as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2dividend to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements at andshareholders made good business sense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018following reasons.

·Distinct Investment Options - AAI desires to establish both itself and the Company as distinct investment alternatives in the financial community.

·Unlock Stockholder Value - AAI opted to distribute its stake in the Company as a means to unlock stockholder value consistent with its corporate plan to spin out operating entities that AAI has incubated for years.

·Free the Company to Raise Capital - AAI keeping a controlling interest in the Company limits the Company’s ability to raise capital independent of AAI. The distribution of the shares to shareholders reduces AAI’s stake.

Manner of the Distribution

As soon as reasonably practical following the date of this Prospectus, AAI will distribute to holders of record of AAI common stock, the Record Date, without any consideration being paid by such holders, ____ share of the Company’s common stock for approximately every share of AAI common stock held on the Record Date. The distribution of the Company’s common stock is referred to as the “Distribution.”

For AAI stockholders who own AAI common stock in registered form, in most cases the transfer agent will credit their shares of the Company’s common stock certificates to book-entry accounts established to hold the Company’s common stock. The distribution agent will mail these shareholders a statement reflecting their Giga common stock ownership shortly after the Distribution Date. For shareholders who own AAI common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee, their shares of Giga common stock will be credited to their accounts by that broker, bank or other nominee. See “The Distribution - Manner of the Distribution.”

6
Table of Contents

Market Price and March 25, 2017Trading

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB, under the symbol “GIGA.” On July 26, 2023, the closing price per share of our common stock as reported by the OTCQB was $0.37[per share. Quotes of stock trading prices on any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and Note 2 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements atmay not necessarily represent actual transactions. See “Trading and forDividend Information.”

Results of the period ended June 30, 2018, eachDistribution

Upon consummation of which is included with this prospectus, our continuation asthe Distribution, neither AAI, nor Ault Lending LLC, a going concern depends upon our reducing expenses, raising additional capital to fund future operations and recognizing sufficient revenue from sales. We have utilized cash in operating activities of $1.6 million and $945,000 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and the three months ended June 30, 2018. As of June 30, 2018, we had a total shareholders’ equity of $1,297,000California limited liability company and an accumulated deficit of $27,793,000.We soldAAI subsidiary (“Ault Lending”), will directly own any shares of our Series E Sharescommon stock but will have the right to acquire up to 44,530,960 shares of our common stock upon the conversion of certain convertible notes that we issued to AAI and Ault Lending on March 26, 2018December 31, 2022 (assuming, for illustrative purposes only, that the conversion price when such convertible notes, in a private placement discussed elsewherethe aggregate principal amount of $11,132,740, are actually converted will be $0.25 (the floor price of the conversion price) and accrued interest thereon is paid in this prospectus, resulting in cash on handcash) and 2,000,000 shares of $1,485,000 at March 31, 2018 and we raised an additional $235,075 of capital through June 30, 2018 through additional sales of Series E Shares andthe Company’s common stock for nominal consideration upon the exercise of warrantsthe warrant that was issued to purchaseAult Lending on December 31, 2022. AAI is expected to be our largest stockholder. See “Principal Shareholders.” However, AAI is limited to owning no more than 4.99% of our common stock.

Beginning in fiscal 2012, we invested primarilystock based upon beneficial ownership limitations contained in the development of our Advanced Signal Generationconvertible notes and Analysis, or ASGA, system product platform for RADAR/EW test applications (which we formerly referred to as “Hydra”) because we believe it possesses greater long-term opportunities for revenue growth and improved gross margins compared to our previous general-purpose test product lines,warrants. For more information on the substantial majority of which have been sold. Through MarchDecember 31, 2018, we had spent over $13 million towards the development of the ASGA system product platform. Although we anticipate long-term revenue growth and improved gross margins from the new ASGA product platform, delays in completing it have also contributed to our losses. We have also experienced delays in the development of features, receipt of orders, and shipments for the new ASGA system products. These delays have significantly contributed to a decrease in working capital from $620,000 at March 25, 2017 to ($386,000) at March 31, 2018. Although ASGA system products have now shipped to several customers, potential delays in the refinement of further features, longer than anticipated sales cycles, or the ability to generate shipments in significant quantities, could significantly contribute to additional future losses.

To address these matters, our management has taken several actions to provide additional liquidity and reduce costs and expenses going forward. These actions are described in the section of this prospectus titled2022, financing (the “AAI Financing”), see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Our Recent Financings.”

Conditions to the Distribution

We expect that the Distribution will be effective on the Distribution Date if certain closing conditions are satisfied. See “The Distribution-Conditions to the Distribution” for a description of such closing conditions.

Reasons for Furnishing this Prospectus

We are furnishing this Prospectus solely to provide information to AAI’s stockholders who will receive shares of our common stock in Note 2the Distribution. You should not construe this Prospectus as an inducement or encouragement to buy, hold or sell any of AAI’s securities or any securities of the Company. We believe that the information contained in this Prospectus is accurate as of the date set forth on the cover. Changes to the information contained in this Prospectus may occur after that date, and neither we nor AAI undertakes any obligation to update the information except in the normal course of our and AAI’s public disclosure obligations and practices.

Relationship between AAI and the Company after the Distribution

After the Distribution AAI will not support us financially in the future. Nonetheless, AAI is entitled to appoint four members of our seven-member Board of Directors (“Board”) until it no longer holds the Series F. See “The Distribution-Relationship between AAI and the Company after the Distribution” and “Management-Executive Officers and Directors.”

Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Distribution

If the fair market value of the Company’s common stock distributed to AAI stockholders exceeds the tax basis of the Company’s common stock (in the hands of AAI), then AAI will recognize gain in the amount of such excess to the same extent as if the Company’s common stock were sold to AAI stockholders at fair market value. We anticipate that the Company’s common stock distributed to AAI shareholders in respect of their AAI shares will be taxable to such shareholders as a dividend to the extent of the stockholder’s pro rata share of AAI’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. In addition, such stockholder’s basis in AAI common stock would be reduced (but not below zero) to the extent the amount of the Company’s common stock received by such AAI stockholder exceeds such stockholder’s pro rate share of AAI’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. See “The Distribution-Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Distribution.” You should consult your tax advisor as to the tax consequences of the Distribution to you.

Corporate Information

The Company was incorporated on March 5, 1980. Gresham was incorporated under Delaware law on November 21, 2018. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 7272 E. Indian School Road, Suite 540, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 and its phone number at that location is (833) 457-6667. Our website address is https://www.gigatronics.com. Gresham’s website address is www.greshamworldwide.com. Neither website is incorporated into this Prospectus. 

7
Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Risk Related to Substantial Dilution

Because of the number of Distribution Shares and PIPE Securities being registered in this Prospectus, holders of our common stock will experience substantial dilution.

There are 5,931,582 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding of notes as of the date of this Prospectus, of which 2,934,985 shares are beneficially owned by AAI. We are registering a total of 70,077,753 shares of our common stock in this Prospectus comprised of 6,880,128 Distribution Shares (which includes an additional 3,960,043 shares of common stock will be issuable upon the conversion by AAI of 514.8 shares of Series F by AAI prior to the Distribution) and 63,197,625 shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of notes or exercise of warrants, as applicable, by the Selling Shareholders. See “The Distribution” and “Selling Shareholders” for more information. Upon consummation of this offering, we will have 73,089,250 shares of common stock outstanding excluding 1,200,000 shares of our common stock, issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrants and 749,626 shares issuable upon final vesting of restricted stock units issued to our Audited Consolidatedexecutive management team and shares issuable under outstanding stock options held by them.

Risks Related to our Financial Statements atCondition

We have doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.

As of March 31, 2023, we believe that there is doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern because we have incurred recurring net losses, our operations have not provided cash flows, and AAI ended its support of our operations although it did recently provide us with an additional $165,000. There was no written documentation in connection with this advance. Our inability to continue as a going concern could have a negative impact on the Company, including our ability to obtain needed financing, and could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. We owe $3.3 million to holders of our convertible notes which are due in October 2023 and do not expect we will have the funds to repay these notes without completing a financing. In additional, we have struggled to make our payroll and have relied on loans from AAI as well as one officer and one director of the Company and some of our executives have agreed to pay cuts and deferrals of their compensation. See “Related Party Transactions” for more information. Convertible notes issued to AAI and Ault Lending mature on December 31, 2024.

Because we need to engage in one or more equity linked financings, our shareholders will be subject to even more dilution

We need to raise capital to provide working capital and pay $3,300,000 of convertible notes due on October 6, 2023. We cannot borrow money from a bank or similar lender. Any new financing or modification may be even further dilutive to our shareholders. Further, the fiscal yearAAI and Ault Lending notes and the Notes and warrants each have price protection so if we enter into a new financing with a lower conversion or exercise price, those instruments will automatically be adjusted resulting in further dilution.

8
Table of Contents

Our legacy business consisting of our Giga-tronics Division and Microsource has declined and its prospects are uncertain. 

We refer to the Giga-tronics Division and Microsource Inc. (“Microsource”) as our legacy Giga-tronics business. A large Microsource customer will not place any significant new orders since it has been scaling back legacy fighter programs. While our Giga-tronics Division’s product offerings are state-of-the-art, it currently has no backlog. While it expects an order from a customer in 2023 the timing has been delayed, and there are no assurances that the order will be placed. Moreover, due to timing and the need to acquire inventory, this Division is likely only to generate $2.0 million in 2023 revenue assuming it receives the order. As a result, it is unlikely that the legacy Giga-tronics business can generate sufficient cash to cover its operating expenses and will require approximately $6.0 million to break even in 2023. While the Company believes that the legacy Giga-tronics business has prospects for growth over the next 12-24 months including sales of Microsource products to customers outside of the United States, the timing and volume of such business remains uncertain and such growth will require an influx of additional working capital to support its operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will continue to operate the legacy Giga-tronics business. 

We have historically incurred net losses and negative cash flow and our operating results may significantly vary from quarter-to-quarter, so we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability.

We have historically experienced net losses and we anticipate continuing to experience some losses in the future. Our operating results are largely determined by the results of operations of Gresham because they are more significant than our legacy Giga-tronics business. Following the closing of the Business Combination, we adopted the financial statements of Gresham as the accounting acquirer. The results for 2021 were solely of Gresham; for 2022, beginning on September 8 they reflected the operations of Gresham and the legacy Giga-tronics business. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we reported revenue of $30,255,000 and $25,580,000 and net losses of $18,418,000 and $2,863,000 respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 20182023 and March 25, 2017 attached2022, we reported revenue of $8,723,000 and $7,244,000 and net losses of $2,450,000 and $510,000, respectively. As said before, 2022 solely reflected Gresham’s results of operations. We expect to this prospectus

We have significant working capital requirements and have experienced operating losses. If we continue to experience incur substantial expenditures to develop and market our products and services and we could continue to incur losses and negative operating losses,cash flow for the foreseeable future.

In addition, our operating results have in the past been subject to quarter-to-quarter fluctuations, and we expect that these fluctuations will continue, and may increase in magnitude, in future periods. Demand for our products is driven by many factors, including the availability of funding for our products in our customers’ budgets. There is a trend for some of our customers to place large orders near the end of a quarter or fiscal year, in part to spend remaining available budget funds. Seasonal fluctuations in customer demand for our products driven by budgetary and other concerns can create corresponding fluctuations in period-to-period revenue, and we therefore cannot assure you that our results in one period are necessarily indicative of our revenue in any future period. In addition, the number and timing of large individual sales and the ability to obtain acceptances of those sales, where applicable, have been difficult for us to predict, and large individual sales have, in some cases, occurred in quarters subsequent to those we anticipated, or have not occurred at all. The loss or deferral of one or more significant sales in a quarter could harm our operating results for such quarter. It is possible that, in some quarters, our operating results will be below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. Finally, supply chain issues may affect future quarters.

With expected reductions in California expenses, it is uncertain whether our operating expenses may continue to increase. Expanding our operations may also impose significant demands on our management, finances, and other resources. Our accounting staff is presently shorthanded. Our comptroller resigned earlier this year although he is assisting on a part-time basis. We need to replace him and another staff accountant. Our ability to manage the anticipated future growth, should it occur, will depend upon expansion of our accounting and other internal management systems and the implementation and subsequent improvement of a variety of systems, procedures and controls. We cannot assure you that significant problems in these areas will not occur. Our failure to expand these areas and implement and improve such systems, procedures, and controls in an efficient manner at a pace consistent with our business could have a material adverse effect on itsour business, financial condition and results of operations. Our attempts to expand our marketing, sales, manufacturing, and customer support efforts may not succeed or generate additional sales or profits in any future period. With an increase in our operating expenses, along with the difficulty in forecasting revenue levels, we may experience significant fluctuations in our results of operations.

 

We are dependent upon obtaining revenues from sales and raising additional capital to meet our working capital needs. Since 2011, we have relied on a series of private placements, legacy product line sales, and loans to fund our operating cash flow deficits. There is no assurance that we will be able to achieve a level of revenue adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or obtain additional financings necessary to support our working capital requirements.

9
Table of Contents

Because AAI is ending its support, we will need additional capital to fund our operations, and our inability to generate or obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

AAI has publicly announced that it intends to distribute its shares of our common stock, on a pro rata basis to the necessary net income or operating cash flowsholders of AAI common stock in the Distribution, subject to meetregulatory approval. AAI will not support us financially in the future although it did recently provide us with an additional $165,000. There was no written documentation in connection with this advance. We will need to raise additional capital to pay our indebtedness and to support our working capital requirements and pay our debts as they become dueplanned growth. AAI currently has over 35,000 stockholders that will receive shares of our common stock in connection with the future due to a varietyDistribution. We estimate that the cost of factorsprinting and other factors discussedmailing of proxy materials for an annual meeting in this “Risk Factors” section.


To bringcompliance with the RADAR/EW product platform to its full potential, we maySEC rules and regulations will increase by approximately $100,000 on annual basis. This will further increase our need to seeksecure additional working capital; however, there arefinancing to fund our operations. Any other future financing may include shares of common stock, shares of preferred stock, warrants to purchase shares of common stock or preferred stock, debt securities, units consisting of the foregoing securities, equity investments from strategic development partners or some combination of the foregoing. There is no assurancesassurance that such working capitaladditional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable terms. If we are unable to us. Weraise additional capital, we may also be required to furthercurtail our operations and take additional measures to reduce expenses ifcosts, including reducing our RADAR/EW product platform sales goals are not achievedworkforce and eliminating outside consultants in order to conserve cash in amounts sufficient to sustain operations and meet our obligations. This could for example, choose to focus solelyin its turn have a material adverse effect on our profitable Microsource component business, segmentoperating results and future prospects. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate profitscomplete any future financing. 

Because we require consents for certain debt financings and cash from operating activities. As partacquisitions, we not be able to pursue these transactions if we cannot obtain the consents.

We issued AAI Series F preferred stock and common stock upon the consummation of such a restructuring, management believes the microwave componentsBusiness Combination. The terms of the Series F contain negative covenants that apply until AAI completes the Distribution. Until that occurs, we must obtain AAI’s consent before, among other things, incurring indebtedness of $1,000,000 in any individual transaction or $2,500,000 in the aggregate, or acquiring any business in which the Company developedaggregate consideration as payable by us is $1 million or more. In addition, if we issue further equity, subject to exceptions for certain excluded securities, such as limited issuances of option to our employees pursuant to equity incentive plans, AAI will have the RADAR/EW test products could be a sourceright to purchase additional equity to maintain its ownership interest. Even when AAI fully converts the Series F into shares of future growth forour common stock prior to the Microsource business segment.

To address these matters,Distribution, the Convertible Notes that we have taken several actionsissued in connection with the AAI Financing and the transaction documents that we entered into in connection with our January 2023 sale of the Notes with the two investment funds (the “Lenders”) contain similar covenants to provide additional liquidity and reduce costs and expenses going forward. These actionsthose that are describedincluded in the section of this prospectus titledSeries F. These provisions could limit our ability to raise capital or make future acquisitions, particularly larger acquisitions. For more information about these negative covenants, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources – Our Recent Financings.”

Economic, Policy and Business Risks

A large percentage of our current revenue is derived from prime defense contractors to the U.S. government and its allies, and the loss of these relationships, a reduction in Note 2government funding or a change in government spending priorities or bidding processes could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our defense programs compete with other policy needs, which may be viewed as more necessary, for limited resources and an ever-changing amount of available funding in the budget and appropriation process. For example, budget and appropriations decisions made by the governments of the United States, the UK and Israel are outside of our control and have long-term consequences for our business. Government spending priorities and levels remain uncertain and difficult to predict and are affected by numerous factors, and the purchase of our audited financial statementsproducts could be superseded by alternate arrangements. While defense budgets in countries around the world have recently increased, there can be no assurance that such increases will continue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 attached to this prospectus. We cannot assure you, however,foreseeable future, or even if they did, that we willwould be a beneficiary thereof. A change in government spending priorities or an increase in non-procurement spending at the expense of our programs, or a reduction in total defense spending, could have material adverse consequences on our future business.

If our reputation or relationships with the governments of the U.S., the UK or Israel or the limited number of defense contractors with which we work were harmed, our future revenues and cash flows would be adversely affected. 

Gresham Worldwide derives most of its revenue from the governments of the U.S., the UK and Israel as well defense contractors around the world that supply those countries and their allies. Our reputation and relationships with various government entities and agencies, in particular with the U.S. Department of Defense and Ministries of Defense in the UK and Israel, and the limited number of defense contractors serving these bodies, are key factors in maintaining and growing these revenues and winning bids for new business. Negative press reports or publicity, regardless of accuracy, could harm our reputation. If our reputation or relationships with government agencies were to be negatively affected, or if we are suspended or barred from contracting with government agencies for any reason, the amount of business with government and other customers would decrease and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

10
Table of Contents

Because we engage in fixed fee contracts with our customers, we face pressure on our gross profit margins and operating costs from inflation.

Our financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity may be negatively impacted by increased levels of inflation. We are not able to predict the timing and effect of inflation, or its duration and severity. Inflation may cause our costs to purchase inventory to be higher than we planned and reduce our gross profit margins. Also, inflation tends to increase compensation of our workforce and other costs. We may not be able to successfully takesell our products to our customers at correspondingly increased prices to cover the impact of inflation, resulting in decreased profit margins.

Governments typically may terminate our contracts at any time prior to their completion, which could lead to unexpected loss of sales and reduction in our backlog.

Under the terms of our contracts with prime defense contractors, the military may unilaterally:

·terminate or modify existing contracts;
·reduce the value of existing contracts through partial termination; and 
·delay the payment of our invoices by government payment offices and/or contractors directly serving the government. 

The government can terminate or modify any of these actions, including adjusting expenses sufficientlyits contracts with us or in a timely manner,our prime contractors either for the federal government’s convenience, or raising additional equity, increasing borrowingsif we or completing a financing on any terms or on terms that are acceptableour prime contractors default, by failing to us. Our inability to take these actions as and when necessary would materially adversely affect our liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and ability to operate. 

Holders of our Series E Shares have voting rights and preferences that may limit our access to additional capital and their interests may conflict with those of our other shareholders.

We must obtain the approval of the holders of our Series E Shares to complete certain types of transactions. For example, the Certificate of Determination for our Series E Shares prohibits us from issuing any shares having preferences that are superior to or on parity with our Series E Shares. Upon a liquidation of the Company, a sale of our Microsource business line, or sale of our Simulation and Electronic Warfare (formerly known as Hydra) business line, the holders of Series E Shares would be entitled to receive their full liquidation preference of $37.50 per Series E Share, or approximately $2.6 million in the aggregate from the liquidation or sale proceeds before we would be permitted to make distributions to holders of our common stock or other series of preferred shares. In addition,perform under the terms of our Investor Rights Agreement with the holdersapplicable contract. A termination arising out of our Series E Shares,default could expose it to liability and have a material adverse effect on its ability to compete for future government contracts and subcontracts. If the government or its prime contractors terminate and/or materially modify any of our contracts or if any applicable options are not exercised, our failure to replace sales generated from such contracts would lower sales and would adversely affect our earnings, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition. While our backlog as of March 31, 2023, was approximately $27 million, our backlog could be adversely affected if contracts are modified or terminated.

We may have liabilities that are not known, probable or estimable at this time

We remain subject to certain past, current, and future liabilities. There could be unasserted claims or assessments against or affecting us, including the failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, there may be liabilities of ours that are neither probable nor estimable at this time that may become probable or estimable in the future, including indemnification requests received from our customers relating to claims of infringement or misappropriation of third party intellectual property or other proprietary rights, tax liabilities arising in connection with ongoing or future tax audits and liabilities in connection with other past, current and future legal claims and litigation. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. We may learn additional information that adversely affects us, such as unknown, unasserted, or contingent liabilities and issues relating to compliance with applicable laws or infringement or misappropriation of third-party intellectual property or other proprietary rights.

The integration of our business and any future acquisitions may disrupt or have a negative impact on our business.

Achieving the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination will depend in significant part upon whether we are able to integrate our combined business in an efficient and effective manner. The actual integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses, and the anticipated benefits of the integration plan may not be realized. The companies may not be able to accomplish the integration process smoothly, successfully or on a timely basis. The necessity of coordinating geographically separated organizations, managements, systems of controls, and facilities and addressing possible differences in business backgrounds, corporate cultures and management philosophies may increase the difficulties of integration. The companies operate numerous systems and controls, including those involving management information, purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, billing, employee benefits, payroll and regulatory compliance. The integration of operations following the Business Combination and future acquisitions will continue to require the dedication of significant management and external resources, which may distract management’s attention from the day-to-day business of the Company and be costly. Employee uncertainty and lack of focus during the integration process may also disrupt our business. Any inability of management to successfully and timely integrate the operations of the two companies could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. For example, our former Chief Executive Officer elected to retire in January 2023, which may be perceived negatively by our legacy employees, contractors, customers, or other stakeholders.

11
Table of Contents

In addition, we plan to make additional acquisitions as part of our growth strategy. Whenever we make acquisitions, we could have difficulty integrating the acquired companies’ personnel and operations with our own. In addition, the key personnel of the acquired business may not be willing to work for us. We cannot predict the effect any expansion may have on our core business. Regardless of whether we are successful in making an acquisition, the negotiations could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees and increase our expenses. In addition to the risks described above, acquisitions are accompanied by inherent risks, including, without limitation, the following:

·difficulty of integrating acquired products, services or operations;
·integration of new employees and management into our culture while maintaining focus on operating efficiently and providing consistently high-quality goods and services;
·potential disruption of the ongoing businesses and distraction of our management and the management of acquired companies;
·complexity associated with managing our company;
·difficulty of incorporating acquired rights or products into our existing business;
·difficulties in disposing of the excess or idle facilities of an acquired company or business and expenses in maintaining such facilities;
·difficulties in maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies;
·potential impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of any integration of new management personnel;
·potential inability or failure to achieve additional sales and enhance our customer base through cross- marketing of the products to new and existing customers;
·effect of any government regulations which relate to the business acquired; and
·potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses or product lines, or the need to spend significant amounts to retool, reposition or modify the marketing and sales of acquired products or the defense of any litigation, whether or not successful, resulting from actions of the acquired company prior to our acquisition.

Our business could be severely impaired if and to the extent that we are unable to succeed in addressing any of these risks or other problems encountered in connection with these acquisitions, many of which cannot be presently identified, these risks and problems could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, increase our expenses and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our goodwill or other intangible assets may become impaired, which could result in material non-cash charges to its results of operations.

We have goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from acquisitions by Gresham of its subsidiaries in the past. At least annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment in the carrying value as defined by generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP, we will evaluate this goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment based on the fair value of each reporting unit. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, we will record an impairment charge. Determination of fair value requires considerable judgment and is sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions, estimates and market factors. Estimated fair values could change if there are changes in our capital structure, cost of debt, interest rates, capital expenditure levels, operating cash flows, or market capitalization. If we are required to obtainrecognize future non-cash charges related to impairment of goodwill, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

At December 31, 2022, we carried a significant amount of goodwill on our balance sheet. To the approvalextent any of holders representing 66.6%our acquisitions do not perform as anticipated and its underlying assumptions and estimates related to the fair value determination are not met, the value of such assets may be negatively affected and we could be required to record impairment charges. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $10.46 million associated with the deterioration of the Series E Shareslegacy Giga-tronics business. Refer to incur any additional indebtedness, other than commercial bank debt or trade debt.Note 9 - Goodwill of our consolidated financial statements included in this Prospectus.

 

These restrictions

12
Table of Contents

Our utilization of net operating loss carryforwards may be limited

As of December 31, 2022, we had a federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward of $18,384,000 and a state NOL carryforward of $22,360,000 available to reduce future taxable income, if any, prior to limitations that may be imposed under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) or otherwise. The federal and state NOL carryforwards begin to expire from year ending 2023 through 2038 and from 2031 through 2042, respectively. The federal NOL amount of $3,286,000 from year ended 2017 through 2022 will have an indefinite life. As of December 31, 2022, we had $10,206,000 of foreign NOL carryforward. 

As a result of the Business Combination, we generally continue to carry such NOLs, but we may be unable to fully use such NOLs, if at all. Under Section 382 of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” (very generally defined as a greater than 50% change, by value, in the corporation’s equity ownership by certain shareholders or groups of shareholders over a rolling three-year period), the corporation’s ability to use its pre-ownership change NOLs to offset its post-ownership change income may be limited. In addition, we may experience an ownership change in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in its stock ownership. Future regulatory changes could also limit our ability to utilize its NOLs. To the extent our NOLs are not utilized to offset future taxable income, our net income and cash flows may be adversely affected. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), as modified by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), among other things, includes changes to U.S. federal tax rates and the rules governing NOL carryforwards. For U.S. federal NOLs arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, with certain exceptions, the Tax Act as modified by the CARES Act limits a taxpayer’s ability to utilize NOL carryforwards in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020, to 80% of taxable income. In addition, U.S. federal NOLs arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, can be carried forward indefinitely. Deferred tax assets for NOLs will need to be measured at the applicable tax rate in effect when the NOLs are expected to be utilized. The new limitation on use of NOLs may significantly impact our ability to utilize our NOLs to offset taxable income in the future. In addition, for state income tax purposes, there may be periods during which the use of NOL carryforwards is suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed.

The effects of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and tensions elsewhere in the world on the capital markets and the economy is uncertain, and we may have to deal with a recessionary economy and economic uncertainty including possible adverse effects upon the capital markets.

While the effects of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the resulting international sanctions are uncertain, they have already had an immediate effect on the global economy, including the economies of the United States and the United Kingdom by causing, among other things, continued inflation and substantial increases in the prices of oil, gas and other commodities. The conflict has created increased uncertainty in the capital markets. The small and microcap markets have not rebounded. The duration of this conflict and its impacts are uncertain. Similarly, tensions in Asia with aggressive conduct in China and North Korea and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East have the potential further add to uncertainty and cause disruption in capital markets. Finally, the recent banking crisis may limit traditional bank financing and lead to more issuers seeking capital from investment bankers and institutional investors. This may make it more difficult for us to raise capital through salesand the result may be more expense and dilution. We cannot predict how these factors will affect the capital markets, but the impact may be adverse and may delay or prevent us from completing future financings or make any financings.

If the inflationary pressures in the United States and elsewhere where we operate continue, we could experience reduced margins and lose future business.

The current inflationary pressures are affecting our gross profit margins particularly since we have lacked the capital to accumulate material inventory. Most of new seriesour contracts (except with Relec) are fixed price, which reduces our margins when inflation occurs. Reducing our selling prices results in further reduction of preferred stock our margins. This customer pricing pressure may also result in the loss of contracts and/or debt withoutfuture business. Finally, we are experiencing rising labor and other costs which may further increase our losses.

We may be unable to execute our acquisition growth strategy.

Once we solve our working capital needs, we plan to make additional acquisitions as part of our growth strategy. Our acquisition growth strategy will involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We may be unable to successfully identify suitable acquisition targets and complete acquisitions. Our ability to execute our growth strategy depends in part on our ability to identify and acquire desirable acquisition candidates as well as our ability to successfully integrate any target’s operations into our business.

Additional factors may negatively impact our growth strategy. Our strategy may require spending significant amounts of capital. If we are unable to obtain additional needed financing on acceptable terms, we may need to reduce the approvalscope of our acquisition growth strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects. If any of the holdersaforementioned factors force management to alter our growth strategy, our growth prospects could be adversely affected.

13
Table of Contents

We will have to pay cash, incur debt, or issue equity as consideration in any future acquisitions, each of which could adversely affect our financial condition or the market price of our Series E Shares, who interestscommon stock. The sale of equity or issuance of equity-linked debt to finance any future acquisitions could result in dilution to our shareholders. Incurring indebtedness may result in increased fixed obligations and could limit our flexibility in managing our business due to covenants or other restrictions contained in debt instruments. In addition, AAI, prior to the Distributions and the Lenders, will have the right to approve or disapprove of any such indebtedness and certain acquisitions.

Further, we may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits of completed acquisitions. Some acquisition targets may not have a developed business or will be experiencing inefficiencies and incur losses. Additionally, small defense contractors which we consider suitable acquisition targets may be different than thoseuniquely dependent on their prior owners and the loss of such owners’ services following the completion of acquisitions may adversely affect their business. Therefore, we may lose our investment in the event that the acquired businesses do not develop as planned or that we are unable to achieve the anticipated cost efficiencies or reduction of losses. Even if we are able to do so, we may not realize the full anticipated benefits of such acquisitions, and our business, financial conditions and results of operations may suffer.

Additionally, our and Gresham’s acquisitions have previously required, and any similar future transactions may also require, significant management efforts and expenditures. Regardless of whether we are successful in making an acquisition, the negotiations could disrupt our ongoing business, divert the attention of our other shareholders who are not entitled to similar preferences or approval rights.management and key employees and increase our expenses.

 

If we lose key personnel, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.

Our success will depend on the continued contributions of key officers and employees. The loss of the services of key officers and employees, whether such loss is through resignation or other causes, or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects. Our financial difficulties and reduction in workforce, could cause employees to leave if they become insecure. Although we expect most of our employees will continue to remain as our employees, it is possible some employees may quit. Depending upon who they are and how many employees quit, we may be adversely affected. In addition we need to hire accounting executives to support our Chief Financial Officer although our cash flow issues may preclude us from doing so.

With the closing of the Business Combination, our management, with the exception of our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Technology Officer, was replaced by Gresham’s management. Our former Chief Executive Officer remained with us in the transition but elected to retire in January 2023 as a full-time employee. If we were to lose Jonathan Read, Timothy Long, and/or Lutz Henckels, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer respectively, our business would be materially and adversely affected. The loss of Zvika Avni, who manages our Israeli operations, could also materially harm our business.

Our sales and profitability may be affected by changes in economic, business and industry conditions.

If the economic climate in the United States or abroad deteriorates, customers or potential customers could reduce or delay their orders. In this environment, our customers may experience financial difficulty, reduce operations and fail to budget or reduce budgets for the purchase of our products. This may lead to longer sales cycles, delays in purchase decisions, payment and collection, and can also result in downward price pressures, causing our sales and profitability to decline. In addition, general economic uncertainty and general declines in capital spending in the defense electronics sector make it difficult to predict changes in the purchasing requirements of our customers and the markets we serve. There are many other factors which could affect our business, including:

·Political factors, which result in a reduction of defense expenditures;
·The end of the Russian war on Ukraine, easing of tensions in Asia and stability in the Middle East;
·Gas shortages and environmental issues which divert defense expenditures in the United Kingdom;
·The continuation of the banking crisis and its effects on the credit and capital markets;
·The introduction and market acceptance of new technologies, products and services; 
·New competitors and new forms of competition; 

14
Table of Contents

·The size and timing of customer orders (for retail distributed physical product); 
·The size and timing of capital expenditures by our customers; 
·Adverse changes in the credit quality of our customers and suppliers; 
·Changes in the pricing policies of, or the introduction of, new products and services by us or our competitors;
·Changes in the terms of our contracts with our customers or suppliers; 
·The availability of products and schedule for deliveries from our suppliers; and 
·Variations in product costs and the mix of products sold. 

These trends and factors could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and diminish our ability to achieve our strategic objectives.

We have been significantly short of capital needed to acquire parts for manufacture of our products to complete orders. At times, we have not had the cash available to make advance payments for the purchase of parts, and then, as a consequence, we would not receive the parts from our vendors required to finish a customer order. This would then delay the delivery of our products to customers and would also delay recognition of the resulting revenue and the receipt of cash from the customer. There can be no assurance that we will not operate at a loss during the current or future fiscal years.

Our future profitability depends upon many factors, including several that are beyond our control. These factors include, without limitation: 

·the availability of working capital;
·supply chain shortages which are in part due to our current cash flow issues;
·changes in the demand for our products and services; 
·the success of our plan to have our Microsource subsidiary help work down the backlog at Microphase Corporation (“Microphase”) to accelerate revenues;
·our loss of key customers or contracts; 
·our ability to hire engineers and other technical personnel; 
·the introduction of competitive products; 
·the failure to gain market acceptance of our new and existing products; and 
·changes in technology which cause some of our products to be obsolete. 

OSales, Business Development and Competitive Risks

urOur sales cycles can be long and unpredictable,and our sales efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, our sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period (except for Relec which is a distributor) to period, which may cause our operating results to fluctuate significantly.significantly

 

The timing of our revenues is difficult to predict. Factors that may contribute to these fluctuations include our dependence on the defense industry, a limited number of customers, the nature and length of our sales cycles for our products and services, the duration and delivery schedules within our customer contracts and our ability to timely develop, produce and upgrade our products.

Most of our revenues result from a limited number of relatively large orders that we receive from prime defense contractors.contractors and government agencies. We spend substantial time and resources on our sales efforts without any assurance that our efforts will produce any sales. In addition, purchases of our products are frequently subject to budget constraints (including constraints imposed by governmental agencies), multiple approvals, and unplanned administrative, processing and other delays. Even if we receive a purchase order from a customer, there may be circumstances or terms relating to the purchase that delay our ability to recognize revenue from that purchase, which makes our revenue difficult to forecast. Our financial condition may also cause potential customers to delay, postpone or decide against placing orders for our products. As a result, it is difficult to predict whether a sale will be completed, the particular fiscal period in which a sale will be completed or the fiscal period in which revenue from a sale will be recognized. For these reasons, our operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter. Such unpredictable operating results may adversely impact the trading price of our common stock.

 

15
Table of Contents

Our boardsales are significantly dependent on the defense industry and a limited number of directorscustomers and its Audit and Nominating Committees are comprised of directors, a majority of whom are not considered to be independent under the standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market..

 

The rules applicable to companiesA significant proportion of our current product and service offerings are directed towards the defense marketplace, which has a limited number of customers. If the defense market demand decreases, our sales may be less than projected with securities listeda resulting decline in revenues. As a result, our business depends upon continued U.S., Israeli, United Kingdom and other countries’ government expenditures on certain securities exchanges require that a listed company’s boarddefense systems for which we provide support. These expenditures have not remained constant over time and have been reduced in some periods. Our business, prospects, financial condition, operating results, and the trading price of directors meet certain independence standards. For example, the Nasdaq Stock Market, where our common stock was listed until 2017, requires thatcould be materially harmed, among other causes, by the majorityfollowing:

·Budgetary constraints, including mandated automatic spending cuts, affecting across-the-board government spending, or specific agencies in particular, and changes in availability and timing of funding
·A shift in expenditures away from defense programs that we support
·U.S. government shutdowns due to, among other reasons, a failure by elected officials to fund the government and other potential delays in the appropriations process
·Delays in the payment of our invoices
·Changes in the political climate and general economic conditions, including a slowdown of the economy or unstable economic conditions and responses to conditions, such as emergency spending, that reduce funds available for other government priorities

Additionally, the loss of any one customer may have a company’s directors be independentmaterial adverse effect on future operating results and thatfinancial condition. Our product backlog also has a company’s nominating, auditnumber of risks and compensation committee be comprised entirelyuncertainties such as the cancellation or deferral of independent directors. We are no longer required to comply with these independence standards because our common stock is no longer listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. We would not meet these standards if they applied to use because a majorityorders, dispute over performance of our board of directors would not be considered to be independent under Nasdaq’s standards and our audit and nominating and governance committees include directors who would not be considered independent under Nasdaq’s independence standards. See “Management - Committees of the Board of Directors” and “—Independence of Board of Directors.” Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that have or that are required to have a board and committees that satisfy Nasdaq’s independence standards.


Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our customers and business partners, some of which is stored on our network and some of which is stored with our third-party vendors. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to operator error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our network and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in competitive hardship, legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the confidentiality of information, disrupt our operations, and damage our reputation, which could adversely affect our business.

If we are deemed to infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties, we could incur unanticipated expense and be prevented from providing our products and services.

We could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our competitors grows and if our products or the functionality of our products overlap with patents of our competitors. While we do not believe that we have infringed or are infringing on any proprietary rights of third parties, we cannot assure you that infringement claims will not be asserted against us or that those claims will be unsuccessful. We could incur substantial costs and diversion of management resources defending any infringement claims whether or not such claims are ultimately successful. Furthermore, a party making a claim against us could secure a judgment awarding substantial damages, as well as injunctive or other equitable relief that could effectively block our ability to provide products or services. In addition, we cannot assure you that licenses for any intellectual property of third parties that might be required for our products or services will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Our business depends on our intellectual property rights, and if we are unable to protect them, our competitive position may suffer.

Our business plan is predicated on our proprietary technology. Accordingly, protecting our intellectual property rights is critical to our continued success and our ability to maintain our competitive position. Our goal iscollect amounts due under these orders. If any of these events were to protect our proprietary rights through a combination of patent, trademark, trade secretoccur, actual shipments could be lower than projected and copyright law, confidentiality agreements and technical measures. We generally enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees, consultants and suppliers and limit access to our trade secrets and technology. We cannot assure you that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology. Misappropriation of our intellectual propertyrevenues could decline which would have an adverse effect on our competitive position.operating results and liquidity.

 

IfWe face intense industry competition and product obsolescence, which, in turn, could increase our losses.

We operate in an industry that is generally characterized by intense competition. Our competitors continuously engage in efforts to expand their business relationships with the same major defense contractors and the government with whom we loseenter contracts and will continue these efforts in the servicesfuture, and the governments may choose to use other contractors. We believe that the principal bases of competition in our markets are breadth of product line, quality of products, stability, reliability, business relationships and reputation of the provider, along with cost. Quantity discounts, price erosion, and rapid product obsolescence due to technological improvements are therefore common in our industry as competitors strive to retain or expand market share. Product obsolescence can lead to increases in unsaleable inventory that may need to be written off and, therefore, could reduce our profitability. Additionally, as we are seeing with Microsource, the U.S. military’s decision to discontinue ordering certain aircraft where Microsource acts as a supplier, results in our loss of orders.

Because our competitors have greater resources, we may not compete effectively. 

Several of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officercompetitors, including, among others, K&L Microwave, Q Microwave, Amplitech, Qorvo, Northrop Grumman, Textron, Keysight, Rohde & Schwarz and National Instruments have substantially greater research and development, manufacturing, marketing, financial, technological personnel, and managerial resources than us. These resources also make these competitors better able to withstand difficult market conditions than us. We cannot provide assurance that any products developed by these competitors will not gain greater market acceptance than any developed by us.

Our products compete and will compete with similar, if not identical, products produced by our competitors. These competitive products could be marketed by well-established, successful companies that possess greater financial, marketing, distribution personnel, and other resources than we do. These companies can implement extensive advertising and promotional campaigns. They can introduce new products to new markets more rapidly. In certain instances, competitors with greater financial resources may be able to enter a market in direct competition with us, offering attractive marketing tools to encourage the sale of products that compete with our products or other key personnel,present cost features that customers may find attractive.

The markets for some of our products (such as our commercial products in the United Kingdom) are also subject to specific competitive risks because these markets are highly price sensitive. Our competitors have competed in the past by lowering prices on certain products. If they do so again, we may be forced to respond by lowering our prices or foregoing business. Either response would constrain revenue growth and/or result in losses. Failure to anticipate and respond to price competition may also further reduce our revenue and increase our losses.

16
Table of Contents

If we are unable to replace them,monetize our EW business, we may be required to discontinue its business.

We initially sold our test solutions in laboratory settings. Competing against market incumbents in this segment exposed greater than expected challenges. Consequently, our EW test sales have fallen short of our expectations due to the longer than expected time required to establish credibility and grow market share in the laboratory segment.

During fiscal 2021, we moved beyond the laboratory environment and pursued opportunities for open-air range applications for our Threat Emulation System (“TEmS”) solution. Market incumbents on these ranges offer single-purpose solutions because the applications being addressed are less data-intensive and narrower in their requirements compared to those in the laboratory environment. We successfully won sales into applications for air-crew training and air-to-ground missile testing.

Through December 31, 2022, we have spent over $24.0 million towards the development of the TEmS solution, but in calendar year 2022, we only sold $1.8 million of EW test products. Over the last four years the sales of EW test products have averaged $2.6 million annually. Our inventory of EW test products was $1.43 million and $1.44 million as of December 31, 2022, and March 31, 2023, respectively. We have no backlog for our EW test and training products as of the date of this Prospects. However, we expect a new order which continues to be delayed.

Accordingly, if we are unable to monetize our EW business, we may be forced to liquidate our remaining inventory and discontinue its operations. 

The sale of our products is dependent upon our ability to satisfy the proprietary requirements of our customers.

We depend upon a relatively narrow range of products for the majority of our revenue. Our success in marketing our products is dependent upon their continued acceptance by our customers. In some cases, our customers require that our products meet their own proprietary requirements. If we are unable to satisfy such requirements, or forecast and adapt to changes in such requirements, our business could be materially harmed.

If we fail to anticipate and adequately respond to rapid technological changes in our industry, including evolving industry-wide standards, in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Rapid technology changes in our industry require us to anticipate, sometimes years in advance, which technologies and/or distribution platforms our products must take advantage of in order to make them competitive in the market at the time they are released. Therefore, we usually start our product development with a range of technical development goals that we hope to be able to achieve for our customers. We may not be able to achieve these goals, or our competition may be able to achieve them more quickly than we can. In either case, our products may be technologically inferior to competitive products, or less appealing to consumers, or both. If we cannot achieve our technology goals for our customers within the original development schedule of our products, then our customers may opt for competitive offerings or we may delay products until these technology goals can be achieved, which may delay or reduce revenue and increase our development expenses. Alternatively, we can increase the resources employed in research and development in an attempt to accelerate our development of new technologies, either to preserve promised delivery date to our customers or to keep up with our competition, which would increase our development expenses and adversely affected.affect our results of operations.

Performance and Operational Risks

If we are unable to identify, attract, train and retain qualified personnel, especially our design and technical personnel, our business and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected and we may not be able to effectively execute our business strategy.

 

Our performance and future success largely dependsdepend on its continuing ability to identify, attract, train, retain and motivate qualified personnel, including its management, sales and marketing, finance and in particular its engineering, design and technical personnel. For example, we currently have a limited number of qualified personnel for the assembling, tuning and testing processes. Members of our technical staff are nearing retirement, and it may be difficult to replace them, given their experience and expertise. In addition, we will need additional staff to deliver on Microphase’s forecasted growth and to allow Enertec to handle more large orders. We do not know whether we can expand our workforce as needed. Our engineering, design and technical personnel represent a significant asset. The competition for qualified personnel in the defense industry in the United States, United Kingdom and Israel is intense and constrains our ability to attract qualified personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of our key employees, especially our key engineering, design and technical personnel, or its inability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

17
Table of Contents

Performance problems in our products or problems arising from the use of our products together with other vendorsproducts may harm our business and reputation.

Products as complex as those we produce may contain unknown and undetected defects or performance problems. For example, it is possible that one of our products might not comply with stipulated specifications under all circumstances. In addition, our customers generally use our products together with their own products and products from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur in a combined equipment environment, it may be difficult to identify the source of the problem. A defect or performance problem could result in lost revenues, increased warranty costs, diversion of engineering and management time and effort, impaired customer relationships and injury to our reputation generally.

Our EW test and training products are complex and could have unknown defects or errors, which may increase our costs, harm our reputation with customers, give rise to costly litigation, or divert our resources from other purposes. 

Our EW test and training systems are extremely complex. Despite testing, our initial products contained defects and errors and may in the future contain defects, errors or performance problems following the sale or when new versions or enhancements are released, or even after these products have been used by our customers for a period of time. These problems could result in expensive and time-consuming design modifications or warranty charges, delays in the introduction of new products or enhancements, significant increases in our service and maintenance costs, diversion of our personnel’s attention from our product development and sales efforts, exposure to liability for damages, damaged customer relationships, and harm to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. In addition, increased development and warranty costs could be substantial and could reduce our operating margins.

We face risks related to production delays, delays of customer orders and the relatively high selling price of our EW testing and training solutions.

Our EW test and training platform has been a primary product development focus for the legacy Giga-tronics business for the last several years. However, delays in completing its initial development, together with early design and manufacturing issues and longer than anticipated sales cycles have contributed to our inability to generate material sales. Additionally, the average selling price of our EW test and training system is considerably higher than our prior general-purpose test and measurement products, which requires additional internal approvals on the part of the customer and generally leads to longer sales cycles. Our financial condition may also cause potential customers to delay, postpone or decide against placing orders for our products. Continued longer than anticipated sales cycles in future fiscal years, or delays in production and shipping volume quantities, could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and liquidity.

Our business could be negatively impacted by cybersecurity threats and other security threats and disruptions.

As a defense contractor, we face certain security threats, including threats to our information technology infrastructure, attempts to gain access to our proprietary or classified information, threats to physical security, and domestic terrorism events. Our information technology networks and related systems are critical to the operation of our business and essential to our ability to successfully perform day-to-day operations. We are also involved with information technology systems for certain customers and other third parties, which generally face similar security threats. Cybersecurity threats in particular, are persistent, evolve quickly and include, but are not limited to, computer viruses, attempts to access information, denial of service and other electronic security breaches believe that we have implemented appropriate measures and controls and invested in skilled information technology resources to appropriately identify threats and mitigate potential risks, but there can be no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to prevent disruptions to mission critical systems, the unauthorized release of confidential information or corruption of data. A security breach or other significant disruption involving these types of information and information technology networks and related systems could: 

·disrupt the proper functioning of these networks and systems and therefore its operations and/or those of certain of its customers; 
·result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of, our proprietary, confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information, our operating companies or their customers, including trade secrets, which others could use to compete against us or for disruptive, destructive or otherwise harmful purposes and outcomes; 

18
Table of Contents

·compromise national security and other sensitive government functions; 
·require significant management attention and resources to remedy the damages that result; 
·subject us to claims for breach of contract, damages, credits, penalties or termination; and
·damage our reputation with its customers and the United States, United Kingdom and Israel, and the public generally.

Any or all of the foregoing could have a negative impact on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. 

Failure of our information technology infrastructure to operate effectively could adversely affect our business.

We depend heavily on information technology infrastructure to achieve our business objectives. If a problem occurs that impairs this infrastructure, the resulting disruption could impede our ability to communicate with our customers, to record or process orders, manufacture, and ship in a timely manner, or otherwise carry on business in the normal course. Any such events could cause us to lose customers or revenue and could require us to incur significant expense to remediate.

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we had disruptions to its business which caused a material effect on its business and results of operations. The future impacts on us, if any, are uncertain.

Our business was materially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The disruptions caused by the pandemic included temporary closures of our facilities, including a shutdown of our Microphase facility in Connecticut for three weeks in December 2020 and suspension of production operations for our Gresham Power subsidiary located in Salisbury, United Kingdom from March 19, 2020, until June 2020 and from November 2020 until the Spring of 2021. This resulted in a significant decrease of revenue in December 2020 and a decrease in January to February 2021. In addition, Gresham Power experienced substantial revenue decreases while shut down. In January 2022, Israel experienced a fifth wave of COVID-19 with the Omicron variant. Many of the workers of Enertec became ill and/or worked from home. Despite this disruption, it did not materially impact Enertec’s operations.

We also incurred expenses related to implementing the workplace safety protocols and adjusting for remote working arrangements. Some non-production employees work remotely part of the time. However, not all employees are as efficient working remotely and our business may be adversely affected as the result. Additionally, certain employees at our production facilities must continue to work on site to continue manufacture for essential government programs.

Further, lockdowns affected our sales and market strategy. This resulted in an increase in the average length of sales cycles to onboard new customers and delays in new projects, which could materially adversely impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition in future periods. 

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the American, Israeli and United Kingdom economies sustained material slowdowns during part of the pandemic. While people continue to be infected with COVID-19, serious illnesses and deaths have diminished. As new variants rise, this trend may not continue.

Because of the uncertainty surrounding COVID-19, we cannot know whether COVID-19 will adversely affect us in the future.

Earthquakes and other events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations

Our Giga-tronics facility is located in the San Francisco Bay Area near known earthquake default zones and is vulnerable to significant damage from earthquakes. We are also vulnerable to other natural disasters, epidemics, such as COVID-19, and other events that could disrupt our operations that may be beyond our control. We do not carry insurance for earthquakes and we may not carry sufficient business interruption insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur. Any losses or damages we incur could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, cash flows and success as an overall business.

19
Table of Contents

Supply chain disruptions and our inability to procure necessary component parts for our products have materially and adversely affected our results of operations and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations in the future.

We manufacture some components for our products, but we rely on contract manufacturers to supply components for many of our product offerings. Our reliance upon such contract manufacturers involves several risks, including reduced control over manufacturing costs, delivery times, reliability and quality of components, unfavorable currency exchange fluctuations, and continued inflationary pressures on many of the raw materials used in the manufacturing of our products. If we were to encounter a shortage of key manufacturing components from limited sources of supply, or experience manufacturing delays caused by reduced manufacturing capacity, the inability of our contract manufacturers to procure raw materials, the loss of key assembly subcontractors, difficulties associated with the transition to our new subcontract manufacturers or other factors, we could experience lost revenue, increased costs, and delays in, or cancellations or rescheduling of, orders or shipments, any of which would materially harm our business.

Supply chain disruptions have affected us. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, we have experienced delays in our receipt of certain components, which temporarily delayed shipments in the U.S., the UK and Israel. Extended delivery lead times have continued into the first three months ended March 31, 2023, delaying revenue realization and requiring extra management focus to work around these delays.

Our Microsource, Microphase, Enertec, Gresham Power and Relec subsidiaries and Giga-tronics’ Division all have experienced supply chain disruptions, albeit in different ways. Our Giga-tronics Division experienced a 55-week delivery lead-time for a memory card and 36-week delivery lead-time for the chassis on which to build its TEmS that constrains the revenue that it can generate and cash flow. Microphase experienced a 45-week delay in securing certain video component parts for a customer, which adversely impacted Microphase’s revenues and cash flows. While Relec experienced a spike in bookings, it encountered longer delivery lead-times for products it distributes. That in turn also delays fulfillment of orders, defers revenue recognition and increases capital requirements to finance the interval between payment for goods and release of goods from inventory to customers for payment. Enertec experienced problems with component delivery times in 2022 and during the first six months of 2023. Enertec began purchasing component parts at least nine months in advance in 2022. The current situation has put a lot of pressure on Enertec’s cash flow. As noted above, extended delivery lead times have persisted into the first three months ended March 31, 2023, delaying revenue realization and requiring extra management focus to work around these delays. [All our operating companies have implemented strategies to deal with extended delivery lead-times and manage customer expectations on delivery dates for our product offerings. We cannot assure you that these initiatives will succeed and supply chain issues will continue to cause challenges for our operating subsidiaries in the future.

The COVID-19 pandemic had significant impacts on our supply chain throughout 2021 and 2022. Many of our suppliers have indicated similar challenges in keeping their own operations running and management believes there may still be some residual delays in fulfilling orders due to limited availability of parts and services. We expect this situation to improve toward the end of 2023. 

We may not be able to procure necessary key components for our products, or we may purchase too much inventory.

The defense industry, and the electronics industry as a whole, can be subject to business cycles. During periods of growth and high demand for our products, we may not have adequate supplies of inventory on hand to satisfy our customers’ needs. Furthermore, during these periods of growth, our suppliers may also experience high demand and, therefore, may not have adequate levels of the components and other materials that we require to build products so that it can meet our customers’ needs. Our inability to secure sufficient components to build products for our customers could negatively impact our sales and operating results. We may choose to mitigate this risk by increasing the levels of inventory for certain key components assuming we have available cash resources. Increased inventory levels can increase the potential risk for excess and obsolescence should our forecasts fail to materialize or if there are negative factors impacting our customers’ end markets. If we purchase too much inventory, we may have to record additional inventory reserves or write-off the inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our gross margins and on our results of operations.

20
Table of Contents

We depend on a limited number of major customers for a significant portion of our revenue. The loss of any of these customers, or the substantial reduction in the quantity of products that they purchase from us, would materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our operating companies typically depend upon a limited number of major customers to generate a significant portion of its revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 and for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, Enertec derived close to 90% to 95% of its revenues from two customers. 83% and 87% of Microphase revenues came from the same six customers while three customers accounted for 76% and 67% of the revenues of Microphase for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, Microphase derived 75% and 66% of its revenue from the same three customers, respectively. However, there is no assurance that the customers, which account for the great proportion of sales in our operating companies will continue placing further orders beyond the backlog orders on hand now. Among the factors that affect future orders are:

·We have no intellectual property rights beyond trade secrets for the equipment we manufacture;
·We are subject to competition from many manufacturers of purpose-built electronics;
·We introduce a new upgraded version of the equipment which may not meet the customer’s needs;
·Changing technology may make our products less useful to the customer;
·The customer may decrease the size of its orders or seek to reduce our selling price at any time;
·The customer may elect to use manufacturers other than our operating companies; and

If one or more of our major customers reduce or cancel their orders scaling back some of their activities, our revenue would be significantly reduced. Furthermore, reduction or diversions in defense spending may lead to reduced demand for our products, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. If the financial condition of one or more of our major customers were to deteriorate, or if such customers have difficulty acquiring investment capital due to any of these or other factors, a substantial decrease in our revenue would likely result. 

If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business and operating results could be harmed.

We are experiencing growth in our operations. This growth will place, significant demands on our management, operational and financial infrastructure. If we do not manage our growth effectively, the quality of our products and services could suffer, which could negatively affect our operating results. To effectively manage our growth, we must continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls and reporting systems and procedures. These system improvements may require significant capital expenditures and management resources. Failure to implement these improvements could hurt our ability to effectively manage our growth and would in its turn have a material adverse impact on our business and future operating results.

If we are unable to successfully expand our production capacity, it could result in material delays, quality issues, increased costs, and loss of business opportunities, which may negatively impact our profit margins and operating results.

Part of our future growth strategy is to increase our production capacity to meet increasing demand for our products. Assuming we obtain sufficient funding to increase our production capacity, any projects to increase such capacity may not be implemented on the anticipated timetable or within budget. We may also experience quality control issues as we implement any production upgrades. Any material delay in completing these projects, or any substantial cost increases or quality issues in connection with these projects could materially delay our ability to bring our products to market and adversely affect our business, reduce our revenue, income, and available cash, all of which could harm our financial condition. 

Our strategic focus on purpose-built electronics solution competencies and concurrent cost reduction plans may be ineffective or may limit our ability to compete.

We devote significant resources to developing and manufacturing bespoke electronics solutions for our customers. Each product typically represents a uniquely tailored solution for a specific customer’s requirements. Failure to meet these customer product requirements or a failure to meet production schedules and/or product quality standards may put us at risk with one or more of these customers. Moreover, changes in market conditions and changes in the needs and requirements of our customers may affect their purchasing decisions. The loss of one or more of our significant custom electronics solution customers could have a material adverse impact on our revenue, business or financial condition.

21
Table of Contents

We have implemented a series of initiatives designed to increase efficiency and reduce costs. While we believe that these actions will have a positive impact, they may not be sufficient to achieve the required operational efficiencies that will enable us to respond more quickly to changes in the market or result in the improvements in our business that we anticipate. Early in 2023, we implemented a reduction in force by laying off 14 employees in our U.S. operations. We may be forced to take additional cost-reducing initiatives, including those involving personnel, which may negatively impact quarterly results of operations as it accounts for severance and other related costs. In addition, there is the risk that such measures could have long-term adverse effects on our business by reducing our pool of talent, decreasing or slowing improvements in our products or services, making it more difficult for us to respond to customers, limiting our ability to increase production quickly if and when the demand for its solutions increases and limiting our ability to hire and retain key personnel. These circumstances could adversely affect our operating results.

Although we depend on sales of our legacy products for a meaningful portion of our revenue, as these products mature, we risk component parts becoming obsolete.

A significant portion of our sales have historically been attributable to our legacy products. We expect that these products may continue to account for a meaningful percentage of our revenue for the foreseeable future. As products mature, however, component parts may become obsolete and to the extent we require component parts we may incur significant expenses to find acceptable substitutes for obsolete parts or to retool and/or re-design such component part. If we fail to do so, we will be unable to sell such mature products.

A significant portion of our contracts are fixed-price contracts that could subject us to losses in the event of cost overruns or a significant increase in inflation.

We negotiate most of our contracts on a fixed-price basis which allows us to benefit from cost savings but also subject us to the risk of potential cost overruns, particularly for firm fixed-price contracts, because we assume the entire cost burden. If our initial estimates are incorrect, we can lose money on these contracts. Government contracts can expose us to potentially large losses because the government can hold us responsible for completing a project or, in certain circumstances, paying the entire cost of our replacement by another provider regardless of the size or foresee ability of any cost overruns that occur over the life of the contract. Because many of these contracts involve new technologies and applications, unforeseen events such as technological difficulties, fluctuations in the price of raw materials, problems with our suppliers and cost overruns, can result in the contractual price becoming less favorable or even unprofitable to us. The United States, the United Kingdom and Israel are experiencing a significant increase in inflation, which could have a significant adverse impact on the profitability of these contracts. Furthermore, if we fail to meet contract deadlines or specifications, we may need to renegotiate contracts on less favorable terms, be forced to pay penalties or liquidated damages or suffer major losses if the customer exercises its right to terminate. In addition, some of our contracts have provisions relating to cost controls and audit rights, and if we fail to meet the terms specified in those contracts we may not realize their full benefits. Cost overruns could have an adverse impact on our operating results.

Many of our operating companies purchase a significant amount of its components and products outside of the countries in which they operate.

With the exception of Microphase and Microsource which source all of their components, and Enertec which sources most of its parts, in the United States, we purchase a majority of our components from foreign manufacturers. In addition, we have a substantial majority of our commercial products assembled, packaged, and tested by subcontractors located outside the United States. These activities are subject to the uncertainties associated with international business operations, including trade barriers and other restrictions, changes in trade policies, governmental regulations, currency exchange fluctuations, reduced protection for intellectual property, war and other military activities, terrorism, changes in social, political, pandemic, or economic conditions, and other disruptions or delays in production or shipments, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results. 

If we are unable to satisfy our customers’ specific product quality, certification or network requirements, our business could be disrupted, and our financial condition could be harmed.

Our customers demand that our products meet stringent quality, performance and reliability standards. We have, from time to time, experienced problems in satisfying such standards. Defects or failures have occurred in the past, and may occur in the future, relating to our product quality, performance and reliability. From time-to-time, our customers also require us to implement specific changes to our products to allow these products to operate within their specific network configurations. If we are unable to remedy these failures or defects or if we cannot complete such required product modifications, we could experience lost revenue, increased costs, including inventory write-offs, warranty expense and costs associated with customer support, delays in, or cancellations or rescheduling of, orders or shipments and product returns or discounts, any of which would harm our business.

22
Table of Contents

Risks Related to our Foreign Operations

We depend on international sales for a material portion of our revenue.

Sales to customers outside of North America accounted for more than two thirds of our net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. For the three month period ended March 31, 2023, sales to customers outside of North America were 73%. We expect that international sales will continue to represent a material portion of our total revenue. International sales are subject to the risks of international business operations as described above, as well as generally longer payment cycles, greater difficulty collecting accounts receivable, and currency restrictions. These risks include the following:

·unexpected changes in practices, tariffs, export quotas, custom duties, trade disputes, tax laws and treaties, particularly due to economic tensions and trade negotiations or other trade restrictions; 
·different labor laws and regulations;
·exposure to many stringent and potentially inconsistent laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection, and information security; 
·changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions; 
·risks resulting from fluctuations of currency exchange rates; 
·risks relating to the trade protection regulations and measures in the United States or in other jurisdictions;
·limitations on Gresham’s ability to reinvest earnings from operations derived from one country to fund the capital needs of its operations in other countries; 
·limited or potentially unfavorable intellectual property protection; and 
·exposure to liabilities under anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the “FCPA”), and similar applicable laws and regulations in other jurisdictions. 

International sales are also subject to the export laws and regulations of the United States and other countries. Further, our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Israel are subject to local regulation which may increase our costs.

Any one or more of these factors could increase our costs and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected by potential political, economic, and military instability in Israel.

A material portion of our business is conducted through Enertec, our Israeli subsidiary. Political, economic, and military conditions in Israel directly affect Enertec’s operations. Beginning in 2021, the state of hostility facing Israel has increased and has led to political turmoil as well as security and economic problems for Israel. Such ongoing hostilities may hinder Israel’s international trade relations and may limit the geographic markets where Enertec can sell its products and solutions. Hostilities involving or threatening Israel, or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners, could materially and adversely affect our operations. There also has been more friction between the Biden Administration and the Israeli government, particularly with the recent change in that government and the proposed judicial reforms which have caused massive protests in Israel. If this were to result in reduced U.S. aid for Israel, it is possible that Enertec’s business could be adversely affected. Further, the protests may result in operating inefficiencies.

In addition, Israel-based companies and companies doing business with Israel have been the subject of an economic boycott by members of the Arab League and certain other predominantly Muslim countries, including Iran, since Israel’s establishment. Although Israel has entered into various agreements with certain Arab countries and the Palestinian Authority, and various declarations have been signed in connection with efforts to resolve some of the economic and political problems in the Middle East, we cannot predict whether or in what manner these problems will be resolved. Wars and acts of terrorism have resulted in significant damage to the Israeli economy, including reducing the level of foreign and local investment. Damages to Enertec’s operations or injuries to employees from rockets launched from Gaza, Lebanon or Iran, — or outright war against Israel — may have a material and adverse effect upon our company.

Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with war and terrorism. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained or that it will sufficiently cover its potential damages. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business.

23
Table of Contents

Many of Enertec’s employees are obligated to perform military reserve duty in Israel, which could have a disruptive impact on our business.

Certain number of Enertec’s officers and employees may be obligated to perform annual reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces and are subject to being called up for active military duty at any time. All Israeli male citizens who have served in the army are subject to an obligation to perform reserve duty until they are between 40 and 49 years old, depending upon the nature of their military service. These military service obligations could have a disruptive impact on our business, if hostilities develop in the future, which may adversely affect our business.

If we are unable to replace Relec’s senior management, it may encounter losses of business and operating losses.

We acquired Relec on November 30, 2020, from its three owners who remained as employees following the closing. We expect that the two of three principals may resign or take a step back from the business after the three-year earn-out period expires in December 2023 or perhaps earlier.Relec relies upon its former owners’ personal relationships and skills experience,to grow and maintain relationships with customers and suppliers. Once they resign, although management believes that it has a sound succession plan in place, Relec may encounter losses of business and operating losses.

A material portion of our revenue and expenses is denominated in foreign currencies, so fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. 

We face foreign exchange risks because a significant portion of our revenue and expenses is denominated in foreign currencies. Further, some suppliers to Enertec and Relec require payment in U.S. dollars, which also exposes us to risk. Generally, U.S. dollar strength adversely impacts the translation of the portion of our revenue that is generated in foreign currencies into the U.S. dollar. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 and the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, a substantial portion of our revenue was denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Our results of operations could also be negatively impacted by a strengthening of the U.S. dollar as a large portion of our costs are U.S. dollar denominated.

We also have foreign exchange risk exposure with respect to certain of its assets that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of its subsidiaries, and its financial results are affected by the re-measurement and translation of these non-U.S. currencies into U.S. dollars, which is reflected in the effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Strengthening of the U.S. dollar could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had gains from foreign currency exchange adjustment of $45,000 and $0 respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, we had gains from foreign currency exchange adjustment of $44,000 and zero, respectively.

Legal Risks

Our limited ability to protect our proprietary information and technology may adversely affect our ability to compete, and our products could infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others, resulting in claims against us, the results of which could be costly.

Many of our products consist entirely or partly of proprietary technology owned by us. Although we seek to protect our technology through a combination of copyrights, trade secret laws and contractual obligations, these protections may not be sufficient to prevent the wrongful appropriation of our intellectual property, nor will they prevent our competitors from independently developing technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our proprietary technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. In order to defend our proprietary rights in the technology utilized in our products from third party infringement, we may be required to institute legal proceedings, which would be costly and would divert our resources from the development of our business. If we are unable to successfully assert and defend our proprietary rights in the technology utilized in our products, our future results could be adversely affected.

Although we attempt to avoid infringing known proprietary rights of third parties in our product development efforts, we may become subject to legal proceedings and policiesclaims for alleged infringement from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Any claims relating to the infringement of third-party proprietary rights, even if not meritorious, could result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention and resources, require us to reengineer or cease sales of our products or require us to enter into royalty or license agreements which are not advantageous to us. In addition, parties making claims may be able to obtain an injunction, which could prevent us from selling our products in the United States or abroad.

24
Table of Contents

We may in the future be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe on our patents, trade secrets or the patents of our licensors. To counter such infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, or we may be required to defend the validity or enforceability of such patents, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that either one or more of our patents or our licensors’ patents is not valid or is unenforceable or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue because our patents do not cover that technology. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing.

Interference proceedings filed by third parties or brought by us may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions regarding our patents or patent applications or those of our partners or licensors. An unfavorable outcome could require us to cease using the related technology or to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms. Our defense of litigation or interference proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may cause us to incur substantial costs and distract the attention of our management and other key personnelemployees. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensors, misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States.

Because of the substantial amount of discovery required in intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

Regulatory and Compliance Risks

Our businesses are subject to government procurement laws and regulations.

We must comply with certain laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of government contracts. These laws and regulations affect how we conduct business with the government, including the business that we do as a subcontractor to large prime contractors that contract directly with the government. In complying with these laws and regulations, we incur additional costs. These costs may increase in the future, thereby reducing our margins, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Failure to comply with these regulations and requirements could lead to fines, penalties, repayments, or compensatory or treble damages, or suspension or debarment from government contracting or subcontracting for a period of time. Among the causes for debarment are violations of various laws, including those related to procurement integrity, export control, government security regulations, employment practices, protection of the environment, accuracy of records, proper recording of costs and foreign corruption. The termination of a government contract or relationship as a result of any of these acts would have an adverse impact on our operations and could have an adverse effect on our standing and eligibility for future government contracts.

Some U.S. federal statutes and regulations provide for penalties, including automatic debarment based on actions such as violations of the U.S. False Claims Act or the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The suspension or debarment in any particular case may be limited to a facility, contract or subsidiary involved in the violation or could be applied to our entire Company in severe circumstances. Even a narrow scope suspension or debarment could result in negative publicity that could adversely affect our ability to continuerenew contracts and to attract, motivatesecure new contracts, both with governments and retain highly qualified employees. In particular, the services of John Regazzi, our Chief Executive Officer,private customers, which could materially and Lutz Henckels, our Chief Financial Officer, are integral to the execution of our business strategy. We believe that the loss of the services of Mr. Regazzi or Dr. Henckels could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. 

If we fail to comply with anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering laws, and similar laws, or allegations of such failure, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We are subject to various anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering laws, including the FCPA, the U.S. Travel Act, and the USA PATRIOT Act. In addition, we are subject to the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Chapter 9 (sub-chapter 5) of the Israeli Penal Law, 1977, the Israeli Prohibition on Money Laundering Law–2000, and possibly other similar laws in countries outside of the United States in which we conduct our business or seek to sell our products. Anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws have been enforced aggressively in recent years and are interpreted broadly to generally prohibit companies, their employees, agents, representatives, business partners, and third-party intermediaries from authorizing, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or benefits to recipients in the public or private sector.

25
Table of Contents

We, our employees, agents, representatives, business partners and third-party intermediaries may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or state-owned or affiliated entities and may be held liable for the corruptor other illegal activities of these employees, agents, representatives, business partners or third-party intermediaries even if we do not explicitly authorize such activities.

These laws also require that we keep accurate records and maintain internal controls and compliance procedures designed to prevent any such actions. While we have policies and procedures to address compliance with such laws, we cannot assure you that Mr. Regazzi or Dr. Henckels or our other executive officers will continue to provide services to the Company. We do not maintain key man insurance for anynone of our key personnel.

Our directors and executive officers and their affiliates beneficially own a significant number of sharesemployees, agents, representatives, business partners or third-party intermediaries will take actions in violation of our common stock.  Their interests may conflict with our outside shareholders, whopolicies and applicable law, for which we may be unableultimately held responsible. In addition, we may be held liable for violations committed of the FCPA or similar foreign laws by companies that we acquire.

Any alleged or actual violation of the FCPA or other applicable anti-bribery, anti-corruption laws, and anti-money laundering laws could result in whistleblower complaints, investigations, enforcement actions, fines and other criminal or civil sanctions, adverse media coverage, loss of export privileges, or suspension or termination of government contracts. Responding to influenceany investigation or enforcement action would require significant attention of our management and exerciseresources, including significant defense costs and other professional fees. Failure to comply with anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering laws, and similar laws, or allegations of such failure, could therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

We are subject to certain governmental regulatory restrictions and regulations relating to international sales.

Some of our products are subject to International Traffic in Arms Regulation (“ITAR”), which are interpreted, enforced and administered by the U.S. Department of State. ITAR regulation controls not only the export, import and trade of certain products specifically designed, modified, configured or adapted for military systems, but also the export of related technical data and defense services as well as foreign production. Any delays in obtaining the required export, import or trade licenses for products subject to ITAR regulation and rules could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and/or operating results. In addition, changes in United States export and import laws that require us to obtain additional export and import licenses or delays in obtaining export or import licenses currently being sought could cause significant shipment delays and, if such delays are too great, could result in the cancellation of orders. Any future restrictions or charges imposed by the United States or any other country on our international sales or foreign subsidiary could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and/or operating results. In addition, from time to time, Gresham has entered into contracts with the Israeli Ministry of Defense which were governed by the U.S. Foreign Military Financing program (“FMF”). Any such future sales would be subject to these regulations. Failure to comply with FMF rules could subject us to investigations that could lead to civil, administrative and possible criminal prosecution, which have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, operating results and/or prospects for obtaining future government business. Failure to comply with ITAR or FMF rules could also have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, and/or operating results.

We are also required to obtain export licenses before filling foreign orders for many of our products that have military or other governmental applications. United States Export Administration regulations control technology exports like our products for reasons of national security and compliance with foreign policy, to guarantee domestic reserves of products in short supply and, under certain circumstances, for the security of a destination country. Thus, any foreign sales of our products requiring export licenses must comply with these general policies. Compliance with these regulations is costly, and these regulations are subject to change, and any such change may require us to improve our technologies, incur expenses or both in order to comply with such regulations.

If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 related to accounting controls and procedures, or if we discover material weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control and accounting procedures, our stock price could decline significantly and raising capital could be more difficult.

If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 related to disclosure controls and procedures, or, if we discover material weaknesses and other deficiencies in our internal control and accounting procedures, our stock price could decline significantly and raising capital could be more difficult. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over our business.financial reporting.

 

As of the date of this prospectus, our executive officers and directors beneficially own approximately 12% of our shares of common stock.  As a result, our executive officers and directors may be able to: affect the election or defeat the election of our directors, amend or prevent amendment to our certificates of incorporation or bylaws, effect or prevent a merger, sale of assets or other corporate transaction, and control the outcome of any other matter submitted to the shareholders for vote. Accordingly, our outside shareholders may be unable to influence management and exercise control over our business.

26

Table of Contents

We do not intend to pay cash dividends to our shareholders, so you will not receive any return on your investment in our common stock prior to selling your shares.

 

We have never paid any dividendsnoted the following deficiencies that we believe to be material weaknesses: 

·At March 31, 2023, we did not have sufficient resources in our accounting department, which restricted our ability to gather, analyze and properly review information related to financial reporting in a timely manner. This weakness is continuing.
·Due to our size and nature, the Company is not able to maintain appropriate segregation of conflicting duties as it is not always possible and is not economically feasible.
·Our primary user access controls to ensure appropriate authorization and segregation of duties that would adequately restrict user and privileged access to the financially relevant systems and data to appropriate personnel were not designed and/or implemented effectively. We did not design and /or implement sufficient controls for program change management to certain financially relevant systems affecting our processes. 
·Due to the lack of appropriate personnel necessary for financial reporting, the Company has failed to properly account for complex financial instruments.

We are focused on remediating these material weaknesses, but our common shareholders and do not foresee doing so. We currently intend to retain any future earnings for funding growth and, therefore, do notmanagement has been distracted with our liquidity concerns. When we can obtain the cash resources, we expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. If we determine that we will pay cash dividends to the holders ofincrease our common stock, we cannot assure that such cash dividends will be paid on a regular basis. The success of your investment in the Company will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation.  As a result, you will not receive any return on your investment prior to selling your shares in our Company and, for the other reasons discussed in this “Risk Factors” section, you may not receive any return on your investment even when you sell your shares in our Company.

We require additional capitalaccounting staff to support our current operationsChief Financial Officer. With our recent reductions of employees, we did not lay off any accounting personnel. However, our vice president of finance recently resigned and this capital has not been readily available.

We will require additional debt or equity financing to fund our current operations. Our recent history of losses, changes to our product focus and the development of new products makes it difficult to evaluate our current business model and future prospects. Accordingly, investors should consider our prospects in light of the costs, uncertainties, delays and difficulties frequently encountered by companies developing new products as we have, in fact, encountered. Potential investors should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties that a company with limited funds and recently developed products, will face. In particular, potential investors should consider that there is a significant risk that we will not be able to:

implement or execute our current business plan, which may or may not be sound;

Successfully and timely sell, manufacture and ship our products;

maintain our anticipated management; and

raise sufficient funds in the capital markets to carry out our business plan.

If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing shareholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our existing capital stock. Any debt financing secured by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to support our current operations and to respond to business challenges would be significantly limited. If we cannot access the capital necessary to support our business, we would be forced to curtail our business activities or even shut down operations. If we cannot execute any one of the foregoing or similar matters relating to our business, the business may fail, in which case you would lose the entire amount of your investment in the Company.

If we fail to maintain anmust replace him. Moreover, effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or prevent fraud.  Any inability to report and file our financial results accurately and timely could harm our reputation and adversely impact the trading price of our common stock.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provideproduce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock could drop significantly.

Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Common Stock

We may not achieve the benefits expected from the Distribution and may be more susceptible to adverse events.

We expect that, as a company independent from AAI, we will be able to grow organically and through acquisitions. Nonetheless, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively asachieve any of these benefits. Further, by separating from AAI, there is a risk that we may be more susceptible to adverse events than we would if an effective control environment existed,have otherwise experienced as a subsidiary of AAI. As a subsidiary of AAI, we enjoyed certain benefits, including economies of scope and ourscale in securing capital, covering accounting, finance and benefits costs, and business and reputation with investors may be harmed.  With each prospective acquisition, we will conduct whatever due diligence is necessary or prudent to assure us that the acquisition target can comply with the internal controls requirements of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  Notwithstanding our diligence, certain internal controls deficienciesrelationships. These benefits may not be detected.as readily achievable as a smaller, stand-alone company.

Because the Distribution and the sale of our stock by the Selling Shareholders will significantly increase the number of free trading shares it is likely many AAI shareholders and the Selling Shareholders will sell their common stock which may depress our stock price.

Immediately after the Distribution, it is possible that there may be a larger number of sellers than purchasers of the Company’s common stock, as our new shareholders may not be interested in owning our common stock and may sell their shares of our common stock. In addition, the Selling Shareholders shall have the ability to sell their common stock upon the conversion and exercise, as applicable, of the PIPE Securities subject to the Beneficial Ownership Limitation. See “Selling Shareholders” and “Plan of Distribution.” If such a situation occurs, the price of our common stock would likely be materially reduced. 

The price of our common stock may have little or no relationship to the historical bid prices of our common stock on the OTCQB.

There has been a relatively illiquid public market for our common stock on the OTCQB. The average daily trading volume of our shares of common stock was 4,426 shares for the three months ended March 31, 2023. It is difficult to predict the broader market demand for our common stock and thus the price of our common stock after giving effect to the Distribution, sales by AAI shareholders and the sale of our common stock by the Selling Shareholders. As a result, any internal control deficienciesyou should not rely on these historical sales prices as they may differ materially from subsequent prices and the trading volume of our common stock following the Distribution and the sale of our common stock by the Selling Shareholders.

27
Table of Contents

The rights of the holders of common stock may be impaired by the potential issuance of preferred stock.

Our charter documents give our Board, the right to create new series of preferred stock. As a result, our Board may, without stockholder approval, issue preferred stock with voting, dividend, conversion, liquidation or other rights which could adversely affect the voting power and equity interest of the holders of common stock. Preferred stock, which could be issued with the right to more than one vote per share, could be utilized as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change of control. The possible impact on takeover attempts could adversely affect the price of our financial condition, resultscommon stock. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of operations and access to capital.  We have not performed an in-depth analysis to determine if historical undiscovered failures of internal controls exist, andpreferred stock, we may issue such shares in the future discover areas of our internal controls that need improvement.future.

 


Risks Related to Our Securities

Our stock price may be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the purchase price.litigation.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

our ability to execute our business plan;

changes in our industry;

competitive pricing pressures;

our ability to obtain working capital financing;

additions or departures of key personnel;

increases in the number of shares of common stock outstanding as our preferred stock converts to common stock, or as warrants are exercised, or both;

sales of our common stock by us or our shareholders;

operating results that fall below expectations;

regulatory developments;

economic and other external factors;

period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results;

the public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or third parties, including filings with the SEC;

changes in financial estimates or ratings by any securities analysts who follow our common stock, our failure to meet these estimates or failure of those analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of our common stock;

changes in expected national defense spending or budgets;

the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock; and

any future sales of our common stock by our officers, directors and shareholders.

 

In addition to changes to market prices based on our results of operations and the securitiesfactors discussed elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section, the market price of and trading volume for our common stock may change for a variety of other reasons, not necessarily related to our actual operating performance. The capital markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuationsextreme volatility that arehas often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. Our stock at any time has historically traded on low volume on the OTCQB Market and, previously, on the NASDAQ Capital Market. Market and volumeThese broad market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. In addition, the average daily trading volume of the securities of small companies can be very low, which may contribute to future volatility. Factors that could cause the market price of our common stock.stock to fluctuate significantly include:

·the results of operating and financial performance and prospects of other companies in our industry;
·strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
·announcements of innovations, increased service capabilities, new or terminated customers or new, amended or terminated contracts by our competitors;
·the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements, and filings with the SEC;
·lack of securities analyst coverage or speculation in the press or investment community about us or market opportunities in the defense electronics industry;
·changes in government policies in the United States and, as our international business increases, in other foreign countries;
·changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities or research analysts who track our common stock or failure of our actual results of operations to meet those expectations;
·market and industry perception of our success, or lack thereof, in pursuing our growth strategy;
·changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;
·any lawsuit involving us, our solutions or our product offerings;
·arrival and departure of key personnel;
·sales of common stock by us, our investors or members of our management team; and
·changes in general market, economic and political conditions in the United States and global economies or financial markets, including those resulting from natural or man-made disasters or the banking crisis.

Any of these factors, as well as broader market and industry factors, may result in large and sudden changes in the trading volume of our common stock and could seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. This may prevent you from being able to sell your shares at or above the price you paid for your shares, if at all. In addition, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s shares, shareholders often institute securities class action litigation against that company. Our involvement in any class action suit or other legal proceeding could divert our senior management’s attention and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If equity research analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade our common stock, the market price of our common stock will likely decline. 

The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the research and reports that equity research analysts, over whom we have no control, publish about our business and us. We may never obtain research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our company, the market price for our common stock could decline. In the event we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage, the market price of our common stock could decline if one or more equity analysts downgrade our common stock or if those analysts issue unfavorable commentary, even if it is inaccurate, or cease publishing reports about us or our business.

28
Table of Contents

WeIf our shares of common stock are subject to the penny stock regulationsrules, it would become more difficult to trade our shares

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or authorized for quotation on certain automated quotation systems, provided that current price and restrictionsvolume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. Unless we are listed on the NYSE American, or the Nasdaq Capital Market or if the price of our common stock is less than $5.00 (as it is now), our common stock will be a penny stock. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, before a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document containing specified information. In addition, the penny stock rules require that before effecting any transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, a broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and youreceive (i) the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement; (ii) a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks; and (iii) a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock, and therefore shareholders may have difficulty selling their shares.

We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock to date, and we do not anticipate paying any such dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that any earnings experienced by us will be retained to finance the implementation of our operational business plan and expected future growth. 

Additionally, any additional financings may be dilutive to our shareholders, and such dilution may be significant based upon the size of such financing.

29
Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Prospectus contains “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “intends,” “potential,” “proposed,” or “continue” or the negative of those terms.

Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information, and are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Future events and our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those reflected in these forward-looking statements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause these differences include, but are not limited to, the following:

·Our ability to close a financing and solve our liquidity problems;
·The successful integration of the Business Combination and the completion of the Distribution; and
·other risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Prospectus.

Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Prospectus are based on our current expectations, intentions and beliefs using information currently available to us only as of the date of such statement, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by U.S. federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

THE DISTRIBUTION

The management of AAI has concluded that it is in the best interests of AAI and its shareholders for AAI to divest all of its existing securities (but not its common stock equivalents (including the shares into which the Series F are convertible) of its interest in the Company. AAI has decided to divest such interest by distributing, based on the number of shares of our outstanding common stock on July 13, 2023, 69.6% of all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (representing the 6,880,128 shares of our common stock that AAI acquired upon the completion of the Business Combination and the conversion of the Series F) in the Distribution. We are a publicly traded company whose shares of common stock are currently quoted on the OTCQB, under the symbol “GIGA.”

Reasons for the Distribution

The principal considerations that led AAI to conclude that it should divest a substantial portion of its interest in the Company are:

·Distinct Investment Options - AAI desires to establish both itself and the Company as distinct investment alternatives in the financial community.
·Unlock Stockholder Value - AAI opted to distribute its stake in the Company as a means to unlock stockholder value consistent with its corporate plan to spin out certain operating entities that AAI has incubated for years.
·Free the Company to Raise Capital - AAI keeping a controlling interest in the Company limits the Company’s ability to raise capital independent of AAI. The distribution of the shares to shareholders reduces AAI’s stake, which should enhance our ability to raise capital based on the Company’s intrinsic value and reduce its dependence on AAI for funding support.

Manner of the Distribution

In order to effect the Distribution, on or before the Distribution Date, AAI will transfer to Broadridge, as distribution agent (the “Agent”) for holders of record of AAI common stock at the close of business on the Record Date, 6,880,128 shares of the Company’s common stock representing 69.6% of our then outstanding shares, which shares will be distributed when the Distribution occurs. Such shares will be distributed to AAI shareholders on the Record Date, without any consideration being paid by such holders, on the basis of ___ share of our common stock for approximately every ____ shares of AAI held..

30
Table of Contents

As of July 13, 2023, 6,895,127 shares of our common stock were held by AAI which includes 14,900 held by a subsidiary. No certificates or scrip representing fractional shares of the Company’s common stock will be issued as part of the Distribution. No fractional shares of the Company’s common stock will be issued in the Distribution. In lieu of receiving fractional shares, holders who would otherwise be entitled to receive fractional shares of the Company’s common stock in the Distribution will receive cash for their fractional interests.

The Distribution will be made in book-entry form. For AAI shareholders who own AAI common stock in registered form, in most cases the transfer agent will credit their shares of the Company’s common stock certificates to book-entry accounts established to hold the Company’s common stock. Book-entry refers to a method of recording stock ownership in our records in which no physical certificates are issued. The Agent will mail these shareholders a statement reflecting the Company’s common stock ownership shortly after the Distribution Date. For shareholders who own AAI common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee, their shares of the Company’s common stock will be credited to their accounts by that broker, bank or other nominee. Each share of the Company’s common stock that is distributed will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. See “Description of Our Securities.” Following the Distribution, shareholders whose shares are held in book-entry form may request the transfer of their shares of the Company’s common stock to a brokerage or other account at any time, without charge.

No holder of AAI common stock will be required to pay any cash or other consideration for the shares of the Company’s common stock to be received by them in the Distribution or to surrender or exchange their respective shares in order to receive shares of the Company’s common stock.

Market Price and Trading

 

Our common stock is subjectcurrently quoted on the OTCQB, under the symbol “GIGA.” See “Trading and Dividend Information.”

Conditions to the provisions of Section 15(g)Distribution

We expect that the Distribution will be effective on the Distribution Date, if the following conditions shall have been satisfied or waived by AAI:

·the AAI Board of Directors (the “AAI Board”) shall have approved the Distribution and not withdrawn such approval, and shall have declared the dividend of our common stock to AAI shareholders;
·the SEC shall have declared effective our Registration Statement on Form S-1, of which this Prospectus forms a part, and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement shall be in effect and no proceedings for that purpose shall be pending before or threatened by the SEC; and
·no order, injunction or decree issued by any governmental authority of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing consummation of the Distribution shall be in effect, and no other event outside the control of AAI shall have occurred or failed to occur that prevents the consummation of the Distribution.

Any of the Exchange Actabove conditions may be waived by the AAI Board to the extent such waiver is permitted by law and Rule 15g-9 thereunder, commonly referredregulation. If the AAI Board waives any condition prior to as the “penny stock rule”. Section 15(g) sets forth certain requirements for transactions in penny stock, and Rule 15g-9(d) incorporates the definition of “penny stock” that is found in Rule 3a51-1effectiveness of the Exchange Act. Registration Statement or change the terms of the Distribution, and the result of such waiver or change is material to AAI shareholders, we will file an amendment to the Registration Statement to revise the disclosure in the Prospectus accordingly. In the event that AAI waives a condition or changes the terms of the Distribution after this Registration Statement on S-1 becomes effective and such waiver or change is material to AAI shareholders, we would communicate such waiver or change to AAI’s shareholders by filing a prospectus supplement or Form 8-K describing the waiver or change.

The SEC generally defines a penny stockfulfillment of the above conditions will not create any obligation on AAI’s part to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions.complete the Distribution. We are subject tonot aware of any material federal, foreign or state regulatory requirements with which we must comply, other than SEC rules and regulations, or any material approvals that we and AAI must obtain, other than the SEC’s penny stock rules.declaration of the effectiveness of the Registration Statement, in connection with the Distribution. AAI may at any time until the Distribution decide to abandon the Distribution or modify or change the terms of the Distribution.

 

31

Table of Contents

 

Because our common stock is deemedReasons for Furnishing this Prospectus

We are furnishing this Prospectus solely to be penny stock, trading in theprovide information to AAI’s shareholders who will receive shares of our common stock in the Distribution. You should not construe this Prospectus as an inducement or encouragement to buy, hold or sell any of our securities or any securities of the Company. We believe that the information contained in this Prospectus is subjectaccurate as of the date set forth on the cover. Changes to additional sales practice requirements on brokerthe information contained in this Prospectus may occur after that date, and neither we nor AAI undertakes any obligation to update the information except in the normal course of our and AAI’s public disclosure obligations and practices.

Relationship between AAI and the Company after the Distribution

After the Distribution, AAI may for a limited period continue to perform certain administrative services for Giga. These services will include certain use of AAI’s management information system, assist in the preparation of federal and state tax returns, assist in the preparation of financial information and handling of certain cash management services.

Pursuant to the Agreement entered into in connection with the Business Combination and the Series F issued to AAI, AAI received the right to appoint four members of a seven-member Board. Its designees are Jonathan Read, Jeffrey Bentz, William Horne and Robert Smith. Except for Mr. Read, AAI’s other designees are AAI directors. Three non-AAI designees, John Regazzi, William Thompson and Thomas Vickers, are directors.

Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Distribution

The following is a summary of the material federal income tax consequences of the distribution. This summary does not discuss tax consequences to categories of holders entitled to special treatment under the code, including, without limitation, foreign persons, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, financial institutions and dealers who sell pennyin stocks and securities. No rulings will be sought from the internal revenue service with respect to the federal income tax consequences of the distribution. Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to specific tax consequences to them of the distribution.

If the fair market value of the Company’s common stock distributed to AAI shareholders exceeds the tax basis of the Company’s common stock (in the hands of AAI), then AAI will recognize gain in the amount of such excess to the same extent as if the Company’s common stock were sold to AAI shareholders at fair market value. We anticipate that the Company’s common stock distributed to AAI shareholders in respect of their AAI stock will be taxable to such shareholders as a dividend to the extent of the stockholder’s pro rata share of AAI’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. In addition, such stockholder’s basis in AAI common stock would be reduced (but not below zero) to the extent the amount of the Company’s common stock received by such AAI stockholder exceeds such stockholder’s pro rate share of AAI’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. See “The Distribution-Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Distribution.” You should consult your tax advisor as to the tax consequences of the spin-off to you.

Resale of the Company’s Common Stock received in the Distribution; Affiliates

The Company’s common stock to personsbe received in the Distribution will be freely transferable under the Securities Act, except for shares of the Company’s common stock issued to any affiliates (as such term is defined under the Securities Act) of the Company at the time of the Distribution. Affiliates may not sell the Company’s common stock acquired in connection with the Distribution except pursuant to an effective Registration Statement under the Securities Act covering such shares, in compliance with Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act or any other than established customersapplicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Persons who may be deemed to be affiliates of the Company generally include individuals or entities that control or are controlled by or under the common control with the Company and accredited investors. “Accredited investors”include executive officers and directors of the Company, as well as the principal shareholders of the Company.

We believe that AAI’s designees on the Board are generally persons with assets in excessaffiliates. See “Principal Shareholders” which discloses the beneficial ownership of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse. For transactions coveredthese affiliates.

This Prospectus may not be used by these rules, broker dealers must make a special suitability determinationsuch affiliates for the purchasepurpose of securities and must haveresale of the purchaser’s written consentCompany’s common stock that they may so receive.

32
Table of Contents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE DISTRIBUTION

The following provides only a summary of certain information regarding the Distribution. The Distribution is also referred to as a spin-off. You should read this Prospectus in its entirety for a more detailed description of the matters described below.

Q:Why am I receiving this document?

A:You are receiving this Prospectus because you are an AAI stockholder. If you are a holder of AAI common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date (as defined above), you will be entitled to receive a distribution of ___ share of the Company’s common stock for approximately every ___ shares of common stock of AAI that you hold on that date. This document will help you understand how the Distribution will result in your ownership of shares in the Company and the operations of the Company as a stand-alone entity.

Q:What are the reasons for the Distribution

A:In the opinion of the AAI Board, the Distribution is in the best interests of AAI and its stockholders. The principal considerations that led AAI to conclude that it should divest a substantial portion of its interest in the Company are: (i) AAI’s desire to establish both AAI itself and the Company as distinct investment alternatives in the financial community, (ii) the lack of an appropriate fit between our business operations, (iii) the manufacturing and high-end engineering nature of our business, in part, in its industries, and (iv) the resulting differences in the Company’s and AAI’s financing strategies.

Q:What is the Distribution?

A:The Distribution or spin-off is the method by which we will separate from AAI. On or about the “Distribution Date, AAI will distribute to holders of record of AAI common stock on the Record Date, without any consideration being paid by such holders, ___share of the Company’s common stock for approximately every ___ shares of AAI common stock held on the Record Date. The distribution of our common stock is referred to as the “Distribution.” Following the Distribution, the Company will be an independent, publicly traded company, and AAI will continue to be a publicly traded company with its own operations.

Q:Is the completion of the spin-off subject to the satisfaction or waiver of any conditions?

A:Yes, the completion of the spin-off is subject to the satisfaction, or the AAI Board’s waiver, of certain conditions. Any of these conditions may be waived by the AAI Board to the extent such waiver is permitted by law. In addition, AAI may at any time until the spin-off decide to abandon the spin-off or modify or change the terms of the spin-off. See “The Distribution - Conditions to the Distribution.”

Q:Can AAI cancel the Distribution even if all conditions have been met?

A:Yes. Until the Distribution has occurred, AAI has the right to not effect the Distribution, even if all the conditions are satisfied. See “The Distribution - Conditions to the Distribution.”

Q:Will the number of AAI shares I own change as a result of the Distribution?

A:No, the number of shares of AAI common stock you own will not change as a result of the Distribution. 

33
Table of Contents

Q:Will the Distribution affect the trading price of the Company’s common stock?

A:We believe that separation from AAI offers our stockholders the greatest long-term value. However, there can be no assurance that, following the Distribution, the trading prices of our common stock will equal or exceed what the trading price of our common stock would have been in the absence of the Distribution. After the Distribution, it is possible that there will be an increase in volume of shares of our common stock being sold. It is also possible that since there may be shareholders that are not round lot holders with 100 or more shares of our common stock after the Distribution, selling shares of our common stock by such shareholders may be cost prohibitive when taking into account broker fees and commissions and compliance with SEC regulations.

Q:What do I have to do to participate in the Distribution?

A:All holders of AAI’s common stock as of the Record Date will participate in the Distribution. You are not required to take any action in order to participate, but we urge you to read this Prospectus carefully. Holders of AAI common stock on the Record Date will not need to pay any cash or deliver any other consideration, including any AAI shares, in order to receive shares of our common stock in the Distribution. In addition, no stockholder approval of the Distribution is required. We are not asking you for a vote and request that you do not send us a proxy card.

Q:What is the record date for the Distribution?

A:AAI will determine record ownership as of the close of business on _____ __, 2023, which we refer to as the Record Date.

Q:When will the Distribution occur?

A:Subject to satisfaction of the conditions described elsewhere in this Prospectus, the Distribution will be effective as of p.m., New York, New York time, on _____ __, 2023, which we refer to as the “Distribution Date.”

Q:How will AAI distribute shares of the Company’s common stock in the Distribution?

A:In order to effect the Distribution, on or before the Distribution Date, AAI will transfer to the Agent for holders of record of AAI common stock at the close of business on the Record Date, 6,880,128 shares of the Company’s common stock. Such shares will be distributed to AAI shareholders on the Record Date, without any consideration being paid by such holders, on the basis of ___ share of the Company’s common stock for approximately each ___ shares of AAI common stock.

Assuming 5,931,582 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the Distribution Date, 6,880,128 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing 69.6% of its then outstanding shares, will be distributed when the Distribution is effected. No certificates or scrip representing fractional shares of the Company’s common stock will be issued as part of the Distribution. In lieu of receiving fractional shares, holders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share of the Company’s common stock will receive cash for such fractional interest. Such cash will be derived from the sale of fractional interests by the Agent on behalf of holders otherwise entitled to fractional shares. The Agent, as promptly as practicable after the Distribution Date, will sell all fractional share interests on the OTCQB, or under certain circumstances to the transaction priorCompany, at then prevailing prices and distribute the net proceeds to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to the first transaction, of a risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. A broker dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements mustshareholders entitled thereto.

The Distribution will be sent disclosing recent price information for penny stocks heldmade in an account and information to the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, these rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to trade and/or maintain a market in ourbook-entry form. For AAI shareholders who own AAI common stock and may affectin registered form, in most cases the ability of our shareholders to sell their shares.

Consequently, these rules may restrict the ability or willingness of a broker-dealer to trade and/or maintain a market in our common stock and may affect the ability of our shareholders to selltransfer agent will credit their shares of the Company’s common stock to book-entry accounts established to hold their shares of Company’s common stock. Book-entry refers to a method of recording stock ownership in our records in which no physical certificates are issued. The Agent will mail these shareholders a statement reflecting the Company’s common stock ownership shortly after the Distribution Date. For shareholders who own AAI common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee, their shares of the Company’s common stock will be credited to their accounts by that broker, bank or other nominee. Each share of the Company’s common stock that is distributed will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. See “Description of Our Securities.” Following the Distribution, shareholders whose shares are held in book-entry form may request the transfer of their shares of the Company’s common stock to a brokerage or other account at any time, without charge.

 

34
Table of Contents

Q:If I sell my shares of AAI common stock on or before the Distribution Date, will I still be entitled to receive shares of common stock in the Distribution?

A:If you sell your shares of AAI common stock before the Record Date, you will not be entitled to receive shares of the Company’s common stock in the spin-off. If you hold shares of AAI common stock on the Record Date and decide to sell them on or before the Distribution Date, you may have the ability to choose to sell your AAI common stock with or without your entitlement to receive our common stock in the Distribution. You should discuss the available options in this regard with your bank, broker, or other nominee.

Q:Will fractional shares be issued in the Distribution?

A:In lieu of receiving fractional shares, holders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share of the Company’s common stock will receive cash for such fractional interest. Such cash will be paid by AAI.

Q:What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences to me of the Distribution?

A:If the fair market value of the Company’s common stock distributed to AAI shareholders exceeds the tax basis of the Company’s common stock (in the hands of AAI), then AAI will recognize gain in the amount of such excess to the same extent as if the Company’s common stock were sold to AAI shareholders at fair market value. We anticipate that the Company’s common stock distributed to AAI shareholders in respect of their AAI stock will be taxable to such shareholders as a dividend to the extent of the stockholder’s pro rata share of AAI’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. In addition, such stockholder’s basis in AAI common stock would be reduced (but not below zero) to the extent the amount of the Company’s common stock received by such AAI stockholder exceeds such stockholder’s pro rate share of AAI’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. See “The Distribution-Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Distribution.” You should consult your tax advisor as to the tax consequences of the spin-off to you.

Q:Do I have appraisal rights in connection with the Distribution?

A:No. Holders of AAI common stock or common stock equivalents are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the Distribution.

Q:Where can I get more information?

A:If you have any questions relating to the mechanics of the spin-off, you should contact the Agent at:

The letter which follows has been supplied by AAI which plans to deliver it to its shareholders in connection with the Distribution.

35
Table of Contents

AULT ALLIANCE, INC.

11411 Southern Highlands Parkway, Suite 240

Las Vegas, Nevada 89141

_______ ____, 2023

To the Holders of Common Stock of Ault Alliance, Inc.:

Ault Alliance, Inc., (formerly known as BitNile Holdings, Inc.) (“AAI”) is hereby distributing shares of common stock of Giga-tronics Incorporated (to change its name to Gresham Worldwide, Inc.) (the “Company,” “Giga” or “Giga-tronics”), a publicly-traded company currently engaged in the design, manufacture, and distribution of specialized electronic solutions, automated test solutions, power electronics, supply and distribution solutions, and radio, microwave and millimeter wave communication systems and components for a variety of applications with a focus on the global defense industry for military airborne, sea and ground applications, on a pro rata basis to the holders of AAI common stock pursuant to the enclosed Prospectus (the “Distribution”).

The Prospectus sets forth information about the Company, its organization, business and properties and the background of its recent acquisition of Gresham Holdings, Inc. (formerly Gresham Worldwide, Inc.) on September 8, 2022, together with historical and pro forma financial statements. Due to the importance of the information contained in this document, you are urged to read it carefully

As explained in the Prospectus, each holder of record of AAI common stock on , 2023, the record date for the Distribution, is receiving ___ share of the Company’s common stock for approximately every ___ shares of AAI common stock held as of such date. No fractional shares of the Company’s common stock are being issued. In lieu of receiving fractional shares, holders of AAI common stock who would otherwise be entitled to receive fractional shares of the Company’s common stock will be receiving cash from AAI for their fractional interests. The Company’s stock certificate or book-entry statement and, if applicable, a check for fractional interests, are enclosed herewith.

The shares of the Company’s common stock that you are receiving have been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which permits you, subject to certain securities laws and rules discussed in the Prospectus, to sell these securities from time to time in either public or privately negotiated transactions. This Prospectus is being sent as information to all AAI stockholders of record on the record date for the Distribution. Holders on the record date are not required to do anything to become entitled to participate in this Distribution.

Sincerely,
MILTON C. (TODD) AULT III
Executive Chairman

36
Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

We will not receive any of the proceeds from the Distribution. We will not receive any proceeds upon the sale of our common stock by the Selling Shareholders in this offering. However, we will receive gross proceeds upon the exercise of the certain warrants issued to the Selling Shareholders if exercised for cash. Any proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital. See “Plan of Distribution” elsewhere in this Prospectus for more information.

CAPITALIZATION

We had 5,931,582 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2023. The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of March 31, 2023 (i) on an actual basis, and (ii) on a pro forma basis giving effect to the issuance of (a) 3,960,043 shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series F held by Ault; and (b) 63,197,625 shares of common stock upon conversion of all outstanding convertible note and warrants held by the Selling Shareholders. All numbers are in thousands except for share data.

  As of 03/31/2023    
  Actual  Pro Forma (1) (2) 
Cash and cash equivalents  2,504   3,357 
Short-term convertible notes (3)  1,660    
Long-term debt and convertible notes (4)  9,442    
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Preferred stock; no par value; Authorized - 1,000,000 shares        
Series F Preferred Stock, 520 shares designated; 514.8 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2023 and none for pro forma  4,990    
Common Stock; no par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 5,931,582 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2023; 13,333,333 shares authorized, 76,482,582 shares issued and outstanding on proforma basis  36,106   53,051 
Accumulated deficit  (30,190)  (30,190)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (1,592)  (1,592)
Non-controlling interest  729   729 
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CAPITALIZATION $10,043  $21,998 

(1) The pro forma table give effect to the issuance of shares of common stock byupon conversion of the Selling Securityholders. However, we will receive proceeds fromSeries F and 63,197,625 upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes and the exercise of the warrants if they are exercised for cash byat the Selling Securityholders, and will use such proceeds for working capital purposes.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Common Stock Market Prices

Our common stock is traded on the OTCQB market under the symbol “GIGA”. The number of record holders of our common stock as September 28, 2018 was approximately 10,939,011. A significantly larger number of shareholders may be “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares of record are held by banks, brokers and$0.25 floor price other financial institutions. The following table shows the high and low closing bid quotations for the common stock during the indicated fiscal periods. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without mark-ups, mark-downs, or commission and may not reflect actual transactions.

 

Fiscal Quarter

 

High

  

Low

 

2019 Fiscal Year

         

Third Quarter

September 30, 2018 – December 29, 2018

(through October 15, 2018)

 $0.35  $0.26 

Second Quarter

July 1, 2018 – September 29, 2018

  0.46   0.30 

First Quarter

April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018

  0.35   0.23 
          

2018 Fiscal Year

         

Fourth Quarter

December 31, 2017 – March 31, 2018

 $0.42  $0.26 

Third Quarter

October 1, 2017 – December 30, 2017

  0.85   0.37 

Second Quarter

June 25, 2017 – September 30, 2017

  0.89   0.58 

First Quarter

March 26, 2017 – June 24, 2017

  0.90   0.73 
          

2017 Fiscal Year

         

Fourth Quarter

December 25, 2016 – March 25, 2017

 $1.07  $0.65 

Third Quarter

September 25, 2016 – December 24, 2016

  0.95   0.63 

Second Quarter

June 26, 2016 – September 24, 2016

  1.15   0.93 

First Quarter

March 27, 2016 – June 25, 2016

  1.47   1.06 

Dividend Policy

We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock in the past and have no current plansthan warrants to do so in the future, believing our available capital is best used to fund our operations, including product development and enhancements. In addition, in the absence of positive retained earnings, California law permits payment of cash dividends on our common stock only to the extent total assets exceed the sum of total liabilities and the liquidation preference amounts of preferred securities. At June 30, 2018, the Company’s assets were less than this sum by $4.2 million. Our Series E Shares provide for semi-annual 6% cash dividends based on the original purchase price of $25.00 per share, however we expect that we will exercise our right to pay any such dividends inacquire 2,000,000 shares of our common stock insteadheld by Ault Lending with an exercise price of $0.01 per share. If the warrants are exercise at a higher price certain pro numbers will be higher including cash; if the warrants are exercised on a cashless basis, there will less cash forand fewer shares outstanding.

(2) No effect has been given to the foreseeable future.exercise of 1,200,000 warrants held by a placement agent or 249,875 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units held by two executive officers or upon their exercise of stock options.

(3) Consists of $3,300,000 in principal due October 11, 2023.

(4) Consists of $282,000 in notes payable and a total of $11,932,545 in convertible notes held by AAI and Ault Lending measured at Fair value (including accrued and unpaid interest as of March 31, 2023).

 

The foregoing pro forma information as adjusted is illustrative only, and our capitalization following the completion of the offerings covered by this Prospectus. You should read this table together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of this Prospectus.

37

Table of Contents

 

Penny StockMANAGEMENT

Our common stock is subject to the provisions of Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15g-9 thereunder, commonly referred to as the “penny stock rule.” Section 15(g) sets forth certain requirements for transactions in penny stock, and Rule 15g-9(d) incorporates the definition of “penny stock” that is found in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. The SEC generally defines a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. We are subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules. Because our common stock is deemed to be penny stock, trading in the shares of our common stock is subject to additional sales practice requirements on broker dealers who sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. “Accredited investors” are generally persons with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse. For transactions covered by these rules, broker dealers must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of securities and must have the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to the first transaction, of a risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. A broker dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for penny stocks held in an account and information to the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, these rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to trade and/or maintain a market in our common stock and may affect the ability of our shareholders to sell their shares. 

MANAGEMENT’SS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

On September 8, 2022, the Company acquired 100% of the capital stock of Gresham from AAI in exchange for 2,920,085 shares of the Company’s common stock and 514.8 shares of Series F that are convertible into an aggregate of 3,960,043 shares of the Company’s common stock. The following discussionCompany also assumed Gresham’s outstanding equity awards representing the right to receive up to 749,626 shares of the Company’s common stock, on an as-converted basis.

The Business Combination is accounted for as a reverse recapitalization with Gresham being the accounting acquirer and analysis should be readthe Company being the acquired company for accounting purposes. Accordingly, all historical financial information presented in conjunction with our audited (and unaudited)the consolidated financial statements represent the accounts of Gresham and its subsidiaries. The shares and net loss per common share prior to the related notes that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. All dollar amountsbusiness combination have been retroactively restated reflecting the exchange ratio established in this registration statement refer to U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.the Business Combination.

 

Overview and Refocusing of Giga-tronics

We produce YIG (Yttrium, Iron, Garnet) tuned oscillators, RADAR filters, and microwave synthesizersThe Company manufactures specialized electronic equipment for use in military defensetest and airborne operational applications. We also produce sophisticated functional test systems which are primarily used in RADAR/EW test applications. We have two reporting segments: MicrosourceOur operations consist of three business segments, the “Precision Electronic Solutions” group, the “Power Electronics & Displays” group, and the Giga-tronics Division.

Microsource develops“RF Solutions” group. The RF Solutions group consists of Microphase located in Connecticut. The group designs and manufactures custom microwave products for military applications in the air, on land and at sea and generates revenue mostly through sole-source production contracts for custom engineered components and manufactures YIG RADAR filters. Microphase produces fixed filters used in fighter jet aircraft, primarily for two prime contractors. These YIG RADAR filters are typically delivered pursuant to contracts covering multiple interim and or fiscal year periods and often include non-recurring engineering services for the design or redesign of these products prior to quantity production orders and deliveries.

Our Giga-tronics Division designs, manufactures and markets a family of functional test products for the RADAR and electronic warfare, or RADAR/EW segment of the defense electronics market. Our RADAR/EW test products are used to evaluate the performance of RADAR and Electronic Warfare (EW) systems. Giga-tronics Division customers include major prime defense contractors, the armed services (primarily in the U.S.) and research institutes.

Our Giga-tronics Division’s RADAR/EW test and simulation products have been our principal new product development initiative since 2011. Between 2013 and 2016, we sold the substantial majority of our original broad product line of general purpose parametric test products used for the design, production, repairF-35 aircraft, shipboard applications and maintenancejammer systems to counter improvised explosive devices on land and produces log-video amplifiers for European military aircraft as well as for the U.S. Air Force B1B bomber. The engineering of aerospace and telecommunications equipment because of lack of growth potential and poor gross margins. We believeeach RF device variant is typically funded by governments through the RADAR/EW test product market possesses greater long-term opportunities for revenue growth and improved gross margins compared to the general purpose test equipment marketplace. We believe that customer spending for RADAR/EW systems, including our test and simulation products, will grow in future years due to the increasing complexity of RADAR signals and foreign investment in new technology which may increase customer demand for more sophisticated test solutions.respective US or European prime contractors.


 

The salesPower Electronics & Displays group consists of our legacy general-purpose test product lines allowed us to significantly reduce our headcounttwo subsidiaries, namely Gresham Power and operating expenses during fiscal years 2018 and 2017. For example, our operating expenses for fiscal 2018 were 15% lower as compared to fiscal year 2017 and 30% lower as compared to fiscal year 2016.

Although we believe our functional RADAR/EW test products have the potential to significantly grow our sales revenue, we have experienced significant delays in developing, manufacturing, and receiving orders for these products. These RADAR/EW test products are the most technically complex and advanced products that we have developed and manufactured, and we have experienced delays in efficiently manufacturing these products and bringing them to market. These products are priced significantly higher than our previous general-purpose test products, and we have experienced longer than anticipated procurement cyclesRelec located in the RADAR/EWUnited Kingdom which primarily produce, market we service.and sell power conversion systems. The delaysPrecision Electronic Solutions group consists of Enertec located in the development, refinement and manufacturing of the RADAR/EW platform products, along with the longer than anticipated procurement cycles, contributed to the significant operating losses in fiscal years 2018 and 2017. Through March 31, 2018, we delivered our new RADAR/EW test products to multiple customers resulting in approximately $10 million in revenue. Additionally, we have recently restructured and refocused our sales force to focus on selling complete custom test solutions to defense agencies and prime contractors as opposed to selling test instruments.

We also anticipate growth in our Microsource RADAR filter business based on our order backlog as of June 30, 2018 and the potential for additional future orders for existing products and related services.

Significant Orders

Both MicrosourceIsrael and the Giga-tronics Division located in California and New Hampshire primarily producing systems and providing services for the defense and health industries. 

Microsource, which is part of the Precision Electronic Solutions group, develops and manufactures sophisticated RADAR filters used in fighter aircraft. Microsource’s primary business is the production of Ytrium-Iron-Garnet (“YIG”) based microwave components designed for a specific customer’s intended operational application. Microsource produces a line of tunable, synthesized band reject filters for solving interference problems in RADAR/EW applications as well as low noise oscillators used on shipboard and land-based self-protection systems. Microsource designs components based upon the Company’s proprietary YIG technology, for each customer’s unique requirement, generally receiveat the customer’s expense. The Giga-tronics Division including Microsource recently executed a limitedReduction in Force (”RIF”) due to its low backlog and near term revenue forecasts.

Recent Trends and Uncertainties

On January 11, 2023, the “Company” entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with two accredited investors (the Lenders pursuant to which the Company sold to the Lenders $3.3 million 10% original issue discount Senior Secured Convertible Notes (the “Notes”) and five-year warrants to purchase shares of common stock, no par value for total gross proceeds of $3,000,000. The net proceeds were used primarily for working capital.

The Notes are secured by the assets of the Company pursuant to a Security Agreement entered into for such purpose, and are senior to the indebtedness payable to AAI, pursuant to a Subordination Agreement entered into in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement.

The Notes mature nine months from the issuance date, or October 6, 2023. The Notes accrue interest at a rate of 6% per annum payable monthly, which increases to 18% upon an event of default. In addition, under the Notes upon an event of default the Company is required to pay 20% of its consolidated revenues monthly on each interest payment date in reduction of the principal amount of the Notes then outstanding.

38
Table of Contents

The warrants entitle the holders to purchase a total of 1,666,666 shares of common stock for a five-year period from issuance, at an exercise price determined equal to the lower of (A) $0.78 and (B) 90% of the lowest volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) for the 10 trading days prior to the date of the exercise, subject to adjustment including downward adjustment upon any dilutive issuance of securities. On October 6, 2023, the number of large customer orders each year. The timingshares of orders, and any associated milestones achievement, can cause significant differencescommon stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the warrants will be doubled, without an adjustment to the exercise price, since the Company will not be able to list its common stock on a national securities exchange by that date.

We are in orders received, backlog, sales, deferred revenue, inventory andthe process of aggressively managing our cash flow when comparing one fiscal period to another. Below isand reducing our expenses. As part of this endeavor, in January-February 2023 we implemented a reviewRIF of recently received significant orders at March 31, 2018:

Microsource

In fiscal 2015, Microsource received a $6.5approximately $1.7 million order for non-recurring engineering services and for delivery of a limited number of flight-qualified prototype hardware from a prime defense contractor to develop a variant ofover the next 12 months. We believe that the RIF will not affect our high performance, fast tuning YIG RADAR filters for a fighter jet aircraft platform. In fiscal 2016production capabilities, nor will it affect our Microsource business unit also finalized an associated multiyear $10.0 million YIG production order. We began shipping the shipping the 2106 YIG production order in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and anticipate shipping the remainder through fiscal 2020.accounting capabilities. 

 

In the past, AAI has allocated certain overhead charges to us. As of December 31, 2022, AAI allocated $1,090,000 of its overhead to us comprised of $230,000 for officer salaries, $90,000 director and officers’ insurance, $630,000 in audit fees and $140,000 in administrative costs. After the Business Combination, we expect to achieve a non-cash savings of approximately $1.1 million per year, as AAI will no longer allocate such expenses. However, this non-cash savings will be partially offset by cash expenses that we will now incur in 2023 for audit fees. We estimate such cash expenditures to be $550,000 in 2023.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. In reading and understanding this discussion of results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, you should be aware of key policies, judgments and assumptions that are important to the portrayal of financial conditions and results.

The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions. The Company’s management believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions used are reasonable based upon information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Key estimates include valuations of the assets and liabilities acquired in the business combination, valuation of convertible notes, reserves for inventories, accruals of certain liabilities, useful lives and the recoverability of long-lived assets and impairment analysis of goodwill.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). The core principle of ASC 606 is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle:

·Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer,
·Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract,
·Step 3: Determine the transaction price,
·Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and
·Step 5: Recognize revenue when the company satisfies a performance obligation.

Foreign Currency Translation

A substantial portion of the Company’s revenues are generated in U.S. dollars. In addition, a substantial portion of the Company’s costs are incurred in U.S. dollars. Our management has determined that the U.S. dollar is the functional currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates.

Accordingly, monetary accounts maintained in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are re-measured into U.S. dollars in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 830, Foreign Currency Matters (“ASC No. 830”). All transaction gains and losses from the re-measurement of monetary balance sheet items are reflected in the statements of operations as financial income or expenses as appropriate.

39
Table of Contents

The financial statements of Relec, Gresham Power and Enertec, whose functional currencies have been determined to be their local currencies, the British Pound (“GBP”), and the New Israeli Shekel (“NIS”), respectively, have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with ASC No. 830. All balance sheet accounts have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Statement of operations amounts have been translated using the average exchange rate in effect for the reporting period. The resulting translation adjustments are reported as other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, and accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in statement of changes in shareholders’ equity (deficit).

Business Combination

We allocate the purchase price of an acquired business to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Acquired customer relations, technology, tradenames and know-how are recognized at fair value. The purchase price allocation process requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date with respect to intangible assets. Direct transaction costs associated with the business combination are expensed as incurred. The allocation of the consideration transferred in certain cases may be subject to revision based on the final determination of fair values during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date. During the fourth quarter of 2022, our legacy Giga-tronics business experienced a lack of backlog, significant decline in sales and a drop in the trading price of its common stock. Due to these factors, we determined that a triggering event had occurred and as a result, we recognized an impairment loss of $10.5 million.

Results of Operations for the Three Months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively

Revenue

The allocation of net revenue was as follows for the periods shown (In thousands):

  Three Months Ended       
Segment March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022  $ Change  % Change 
Precision Electronic Solutions $3,941  $3,254  $686   21%
Power Electronics & Displays  2,991   2,479  $512   21%
RF Solutions  1,791   1,511   281   19%
Total $8,723  $7,244  $1,479   20%

The Precision Electronic Solutions group generated net revenue of $3.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2023, a 21% increase from the three months ended March 31, 2022. The increase was primarily due to the addition of $430,000 of GIGA revenue which was not included in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, Microsource received2022. The Power Electronics & Displays group increased revenue by 21% to $3.0 million primarily due to a $4.551% increase in shipments by Gresham Power caused by the completion of a large fixed price contract. The RF solutions group increased revenue by 19% to $1.8 million YIG RADAR filter we have been manufacturing for a fighter jet platform since fiscal 2014. We shipped approximately $4.1 million of this order in fiscal 2017 and shipped the remainder in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.2023 due to improvements in the supply chain.

 

In July 2016, Microsource receivedCost of revenue and gross profit were as follows for the periods shown (In thousands):

  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
Segment March 31, 2023  % of Segment Revenue  March 31, 2022  % of Segment Revenue 
Precision Electronic Solutions $3,210   81% $2,316   71%
Power Electronics & Displays  2,111   71%  1,593   64%
RF Solutions  1,239   69%  842   56%
Total cost of revenue $6,560   75% $4,751   66%
.                
Gross profit $2,163   25% $2,493   34%

40
Table of Contents

Gross profits for the three months ended March 31, 2023 decreased by $330,000 to $2.2 million from $2.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2022. Cost of revenue as a $1.9percentage of segment revenue increased by 10% for the Precision Electronic Solutions group due to low revenues of the Giga-tronics group and the associated absorption of manufacturing overhead expenses. The gross margins of the Power Electronics & Displays group decreased by 7% due to overruns upon completion of a fixed price contract resulting in a 5% gross margin. The RF solutions group recognized a 13% increase in its cost of revenues as a percentage of segment revenue primarily due to a $230,000 inventory obsolescence charge.

Operating expenses were as follows for the periods shown (In thousands): 

  Three Months Ended       
Category March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022  $ Change  % Change 
Research and development $723  $489  $234   48%
Selling and marketing and general and administrative  5,231   2,495   2,736   110%
Total $5,954  $2,984  $2,970   100%

Total operating expenses increased 94% or $2.8 million non-recurring engineering order associatedin the first quarter ended March 31, 2023 as compared with redesigningthe first quarter of 2022. Research and development expenses increased by $234,000 due to the business combination of Gresham with the Company. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 103% primarily due the issuance cost of $1.2 million of the Notes and warrants, as well as the added general and administrative costs of the legacy Giga-tronics business in the first quarter of 2023 which was not incurred in the first quarter of 2022, as well as the addition of approximate $400,000 for legal and audit expenses.

Other income (expenses), net were as follows for the periods shown (In thousands):

  Three Months Ended       
Category March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022  $ Change  % Change 
Interest expense, related party $  $(12) $12   (100)%
Interest expense  (213)  (67)  (146)  218%
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes, related party  566      566   %
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes and warrant liabilities  939      939   %
Foreign currency exchange adjustment  44      44   %
Other income (expense)  (2)  60   (62)  (103)%
Total other (expense) income, net $1,334  $(19) $1,353     

For the three months ended March 31, 2023, interest expense increased by $146,000 primarily due to increased borrowing and higher interest rates. The Company performed a componentfair value analysis of its high performance YIG filter used ondebts and warrant liability as of March 31, 2023 and recognized a fighter jet aircraft platform. Of this non-recurring engineering services service order, we delivered servicesnon-cash gain of approximately $884,000$566,000 for related party notes and $816,000 in fiscal years 2017 and 2018, respectively, and expect to deliver$939,000 for the remaining services during fiscal 2019.Notes.

41
Table of Contents

 

In September 2017, Microsource receivedNet Loss

Net loss was as follows for the periods shown (In thousands):

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022 
Revenue $8,723  $7,244 
Cost of revenue  6,560   4,751 
Gross profit  2,163   2,493 
.        
Operating expenses  5,954   2,984 
Other income (expense), net  1,334   (19)
Income tax (provision) benefit  7    
Net loss  (2,450)  (510)
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest  (14)  13 
Net loss available to common shareholders $(2,464) $(497)

Net loss attributable to common shareholders for the quarter ended March 31, 2023 was $2.5 million, compared to a $4.8 million order for continuing the YIG RADAR filter for a fighter jet platform. The Company expects to begin initial shipmentsnet loss of these filters$497,000 recorded in the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2022. The $2.0 million increase in losses was primarily due to the combination of fiscal 2018lower gross margins and ship the bulk of the order over the succeeding 9 to 12 month period.higher operating expenses as described above.

 

In February 2018, Microsource received a $1.6 million YIG RADAR filter order from one of our customers. We expect to start shipping this order in the second quarter of fiscal 2019.Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

Giga-tronics Division

In June 2016,A Non-GAAP financial measure is generally defined by the Giga-tronics Division receivedSEC as a $3.3 million ordernumerical measure of a company’s historical or future performance, financial position or cash flows that includes or excludes amounts from the U.S. Navy formost directly comparable measure under GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative to, our Real-Time Threat Emulation System (TEmS) which is a combination of the ASGA hardware platform, along with software developed and licensed to us from a major aerospace and defense company. The complete order included ASGA blades, along with engineering services to integrate the Real-Time TEmS product with additional third-party hardware and software for the customer. We fulfilled the order during the fourth quarter of our 2017 fiscal year. In July 2016, we received an additional order for $542,000 from the U.S. Navy for our ASG hardware only platform. We fulfilled this order in the second quarter of our 2017 fiscal year.


In July 2017, the Giga-tronics Division received a follow on $1.7 million order from the U.S. Navy for our TEmS product. We fulfilled this order during the third quarter of fiscal 2018.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and thereported results of operations are based upon our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017, which we refer to as our 2018 Audited Financial Statements, included in this prospectus and the data used to prepare them. The 2018 Audited Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted inGAAP. Users of this financial information should consider the United Statestypes of events and management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions in the course of such preparation. The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included with the 2018 Audited Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we re-evaluate our judgments, estimates and assumptions. We base our judgment and estimates on historical experience, knowledge of current conditions, and our beliefs of what could occur in the future considering available information. Actual results may differtransactions that are excluded from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the following as our critical accounting policies:

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized when there is evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. This generally occurs when products are shipped and the risk of loss has passed. Revenue related to products shipped subject to customers’ evaluation is recognized upon final acceptance. Revenue recognized under the milestone method is recognized once milestones are met. Determining whether a milestone is substantive is a matter of judgment and that assessment is performed only at the inception of the arrangement. The consideration earned from the achievement of a milestone must meet all of the following for the milestone to be considered substantive:

a.

It is commensurate with either of the following:

1.

Our performance to achieve the milestone, or

2.

The enhancement of the value of the delivered item or items as a result of a specific outcome resulting from our performance to achieve the milestone.

b.

It relates solely to past performance.

c.

It is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms (including other potential milestone consideration) within the arrangement.

Milestones for revenue recognition are agreed upon with the customer prior to the start of the contract and some milestones will be tied to product shipping while others will be tied to design review.

On certain contracts with one of our significant customers we receive payments in advance of manufacturing. Advanced payments are recorded as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria described above have been met.

Product Warranties

Our warranty policy generally provides one to three years of coverage depending on the product. We record a liability for estimated warranty obligations at the date products are sold. The estimated cost of warranty coverage is based on our actual historical experience with our current products or similar products. For new products, the required reserve is based on historical experience of similar products until sufficient historical data has been collected on the new product. Adjustments are made as new information becomes available.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are stated at their net realizable values. We have estimated an allowance for uncollectible accounts based on our analysis of specifically identified problem accounts, outstanding receivables, consideration of the age of those receivables, our historical collection experience, and adjustments for other factors management believes are necessary based on perceived credit risk.


Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis. We periodically review inventory on hand to identify and write down excess and obsolete inventory based on estimated product demand.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Future tax benefits are subject to a valuation allowance when management is unable to conclude that its deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers both positive and negative evidence and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.measures.

 

We consider allmeasure our operating performance in part based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). We also measure our operating performance based on “Adjusted EBITDA,” which we define as EBITDA adjusted for net other income or expense items, share based compensation and certain one-time income or expense items. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures that are commonly used, but neither is a recognized accounting term under GAAP. We use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to monitor and facilitate internal evaluation of the performance of our business operations, to facilitate external comparison of our business results to those of others in our industry, and to plan and evaluate our operating budgets. We believe that our measures of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide useful information to the investing public regarding our operating performance and our ability to service debt and fund capital expenditures and may help investors understand and compare our results to other companies that have different financing, capital and tax positions recognizedstructures. Neither EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, but as a supplement to, income or loss from operations, net income or loss, cash flows from operating activities, or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

In the following reconciliation, we provide amounts as reflected in our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the likelihood of realization. When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the positions taken or the amounts of the positions that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above, if any, would be reflected as unrecognized tax benefits, as applicable, along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. We also recognize accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations.unless otherwise noted.

 

Share Based CompensationThe reconciliation of our Net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is as follows (In thousands): 

 

We have stock incentive plans providing for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock to employees and directors. We calculate share based compensation expense for stock options using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model and record the fair value of stock option and restricted stock awards expected to vest over the requisite service period. In so doing, we make certain key assumptions in making estimates used in the model. We believe the estimates used, which are presented in the Notes to our 2018 Audited Financial Statements, are appropriate and reasonable.

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022 
Net loss $(2,450) $(510)
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest  (14)  13 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders  (2,464)  (497)
Depreciation and amortization  553   253 
Interest and taxes  220   67 
EBITDA  (1,691)  (177)
         
Adjustments:        
Stock-based compensation  106   41 
Compensation warrant issued in connection with senior secured convertible notes  858    
Offering costs in connection with senior secured convertible notes  653    
Change in fair value of notes payable, related parties  (566)   
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes and warrant liabilities  (939)   
Other expenses, net  (2)  60 
Foreign currency exchange adjustment  44    
Adjusted EBITDA $(1,537) $(76)

 

Going Concern

We evaluate our relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that our financial statements are issued. This includes management’s preparation and review of a forecasting process that evaluates a twelve-month horizon period post issuance of the consolidated financial statements. Management responds to the known and reasonably knowable circumstances that give rise to our initial doubt as a going concern by implementing plans that are reasonably sufficient to overcome the conditions that give rise to our ability to continue. Our 2018 Audited Financial Statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result if we were unable to do so.

Software Development Costs

We expense development costs included in the research and development of new products and enhancements to existing products as incurred, until technological feasibility in the form of a working model has been established. Development costs of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are subject to capitalization beginning when our product’s technological feasibility has been established and ending when the product is available for general release to our customers.

42

Table of Contents

 

Discontinued Operations

We review reporting and presentation requirements for discontinued operations in accordance with the guidance provided by ASC 205-20 as we move to newer technology within the test market from legacy products to the newly developed Advanced Signal Generator. The disposal of these product line sales represent an evolution of the Company’s Giga-tronics Division to a more sophisticated product offered to the same customer base. The Company has evaluated the sales of product lines concluding that each product line does not meet the definition of a “component of an entity” as defined by ASC 205-20.We are able to distinguish revenue and gross margin information as disclosed in the Notes to our 2018 Audited Financial Statements, Sale of Product Lines; however, operations and cash flow information is not clearly distinguishable and the Company is unable to present meaningful information about results of operations and cash flows from those product lines.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance-sheet arrangements (including standby letters of credit, guaranties, contingent interests in transferred assets, contingent obligations indexed to its own stock or any obligation arising out of a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides credit or other support to the Company), that have or are likely to have a material effect on its financial conditions, changes in financial conditions, revenue, expense, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. 

Results of OperationsDiscussion of Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended Marchyears ended December 31, 20182022 and March 25, 20172021, respectively

 

New orders by reporting segment are as follows for the fiscal years ended:respective periods (In thousands): 

 

New Orders             % Change 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 2018  

 

 

2017

  

 

 

2016

  

2018

vs.
2017

  

2017

vs.

2016

 

ASGA (fka “Hydra”)

 $1,813  $4,803  $2,506   (62)%  92%

Legacy Product

  238   2,724   7,182   (91)%  (62)%

Giga-tronics Division

 $2,051  $7,527  $9,688   (73)%  (22)%

Microsource

  7,550   7,567   13,739   (0.2)%  (45)%

Total

 $9,601  $15,094  $23,427   (36)%  (36)%

Total new orders received in fiscal 2018 were $9.6 million which was $5.5 million or 36% lower than the $15.1 million received in fiscal 2017. The decrease was primarily the result of lower Giga-tronics Division product orders ($5.5 million or 73%) due mainly to our recent divestures of legacy test product lines and a decrease in ASGA product orders of $3.0 million due to a longer than anticipated sales cycle.

  Year Ended       
Segment December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021  $ Change  % Change 
Precision Electronic Solutions $15,903  $11,704  $4,199   36%
Power Electronics & Displays  12,507   10,286   2,221   22%
RF Solutions  6,673   11,066   (4,393)  (40)%
Total $35,083  $33,056  $2,027   6%

 

New orders received in fiscal 2017 decreasedfor the year ended December 31, 2022 were $35.1 million as compared to $33.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Precision Electronic Solutions group increased its orders by $8.3 million or 36% from fiscal 2016. The Giga-tronics Division orders decreased by $2.2 million or 22% primarily due to the decreased orders for its catheter calibration product produced by Enertec. The Power Electronics & Displays group increased orders by 22% in dollars but was negatively impacted by the legacy and switch products whichstrengthening of the Company no longer manufactures. Our Microsource business unit sawdollar. The RF Solutions group experienced a $6.2 million or 45%40% decrease in fiscal 2017new orders primarily due to the impact of a large, multi-year $10.0orders totaling $6.3 million YIG initial production order (in which scheduled product deliveries are through 2020) and a $3.0 million ongoing production order, both received from one prime contractor in fiscal 2016, compared to a smaller $4.5 million order for YIG RADAR filters (in2021, which scheduled deliveries covered a shorter period) and a related $1.9 million order for non-recurring engineering services receiveddid not repeat in fiscal 2017. 2022.


 

The following table shows order backlog and related information at fiscal year-end for the indicated years:end of the respective periods (In thousands):

 

Backlog             % change 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2018

vs.

2017

  

2017

vs.

2016

 

ASGA (fka “Hydra”)

 $20  $562  $1,003   (96)%  (44)%

Legacy Products

  57   201   2,277   (72)%  (91)%

Giga-tronics Division

  77   763   3,280   (90)%  (77)%

Microsource

  11,088   10,601   11,280   4.6%  (6)%

Backlog of unfilled orders

 $11,165  $11,364  $14,560   (1.8)%  (22)%

ASGA (fka “Hydra”)

  20   562   1,003   (96)%  (44)%

Legacy Products

  57   201   2,277   (72)%  (91)%

Giga-tronics Division

  77   763   3,280   (90)%  (77)%

Microsource

  7,342   4,917   2,704   49%  82%

Backlog of unfilled orders shippable within one year

 $7,419  $5,680  $5,984   31%  (5)%

ASGA (fka “Hydra”)

          

    

Legacy Products

               

Giga-tronics Division

                 

Microsource

  3,746   5,684   8,576   (34)%  (34)%

Backlog of unfilled orders shippable after one year

 $3,746  $5,684  $8,576   (34)%  (34)%
  As of       
Segment December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021  $ Change  % Change 
Precision Electronic Solutions $11,682  $9,286  $2,396   26%
Power Electronics & Displays  8,890   6,558   2,332   36%
RF Solutions  10,125   9,581   544   6%
Total $30,697  $25,425  $5,272   21%

 

Backlog at the endas of fiscal 2018 decreased by $199,000 or 1.8%December 31, 2022 increased 21% compared to the end of fiscal 2017. The decrease in backlog was primarily due to a longer than anticipated sales cycle for ASGA products for the Giga-tronics Division offset by an increase in YIG RADAR filter products for Microsource.

Backlog at the end of fiscal 2017 decreased $3.2 million or 22% compared to the end of fiscal 2016. The decrease in backlog wasDecember 31, 2021 primarily due to the completion of36% increase in bookings by the non-recurring engineering services order forPrecision Electronic Solutions group, and the Microsource reporting segment as well as22 % increase in bookings by the fulfillment of ASGA orders for the Giga-tronics Division. Backlog also decreased duePower Electronics & Display group. The RF solutions group increased its backlog by 6% to the fulfillment of the legacy and switch product lines as the Company sold these products lines in fiscal 2017.$10.4 million. 

 

The allocation of net sales by reporting segmentrevenue was as follows for the fiscal years shown:periods shown (In thousands):

 

Allocation of Net Sales  

% change

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2018

vs.

2017

  

2017

vs.

2016

 

ASGA (“Hydra”) Sales

 $2,205  $5,286  $1,783   (58)%  197%

Legacy Product Sale

  532   2,735   6,896   (81)%  (60)%

Giga-tronics Division

 $2,737  $8,021  $8,679   (66)%  (8)%

Microsource

  7,063   8,246   5,917   (14)%  39%

Total

 $9,800  $16,267  $14,596   (40)%  11%
  Year Ended       
Segment December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021  $ Change  % Change 
Precision Electronic Solutions $13,950  $10,932  $3,018   28%
Power Electronics & Displays  10,175   7,854   2,321   30%
RF Solutions  6,130   6,794   (664)  (10)%
Total $30,255  $25,580  $4,675   18%

 

Net salesThe Precision Electronic Solutions group generated net revenue of $14.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, a 28% increase over the same period in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $3.0 million in shipments of Enertec’s medical catheter calibration product as well as the addition of $1.4 million of legacy Giga-tronics revenue for the fiscalperiod of September 8, 2022 through December 31, 2022 offset by a reduction in defense spending by one large military customer. 

The Power Electronics & Displays group increased revenue by 30% for the year ended MarchDecember 31, 2018 were $9.8 million, a decrease of 40%, compared2022 in comparison to $16.3 million for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2017. The majority of the sales decrease in fiscal 2018 was attributable to the Giga-tronics Division which was lower by $5.3 million or 66%December 31, 2021 primarily due to a $3.1 million or 58% decrease in ASGA product sales due to longer than anticipated sales cycles and in part, by the Company’s reduced focus on selling complete RADAR/EW test solutions in fiscal 2018, and a $2.2 million or 81% decrease in legacy product sales due to the Company’s recent legacy product line divestitures. Microsource sales decreased in fiscal 2018 by $1.2 million or 14% compared to fiscal 2017 due to lower scheduled YIG RADAR filter shipments in fiscal 2018 and the completion of certain related nonrecurring engineering (NRE) services in fiscal 2017.

Net sales for fiscal 2017 were $16.3 million, an increase of $1.7 million or 11% compared to $14.6 million in fiscal 2016. The majority of the sales135% increase in fiscal 2017 was attributable to Microsource due to anrevenue by Gresham Power as well as a 17% increase in scheduled YIG RADAR filter shipments in fiscal 2017 and the completionby Relec as a result of certain related non-recurring engineering services in fiscal 2017. Giga-tronics Divisionincreased sales decreased $658,000 or 8% in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 which was comprised of a $4.2 million or 60% decrease in legacy product sales due to recent product line divestitures which was substantially offset by a $3.5 million increase in ASGA system shipments due mainly to the orders from the US Navy in fiscal 2017.efforts.


 

The allocationRF Solutions group recognized a 10% decline in revenue by Microphase largely due to supply chain issues for its video products.

43
Table of Contents

Cost of revenue and gross margin by reporting segment wasprofit were as follows for the fiscal years shown:periods shown (In thousands):

 

Gross Margin  

% change

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2018

vs.

2017

  

2017

vs.

2016

 

Giga-tronics Division

 $(12) $1,512  $2,360   (101)%  (36)%

Microsource

  2,748   3,039   2,261   (10)%  34%

Total

 $2,736  $4,551  $4,621   (40)%  (2)%
  Year Ended  Year Ended 
Segment December 31, 2022  % of Segment
Revenue
  December 31, 2021  % of Segment
Revenue
 
Precision Electronic Solutions $10,632   76% $7,419   68%
Power Electronics & Displays  6,651   65%  5,361   68%
RF Solutions  4,497   73%  4,451   66%
Total cost of revenue $21,780   72% $17,231   67%
                 
Gross profit $8,475   28% $8,349   33%

 

OverallGross profit was $8.5 million or 28% for the year ended December 31, 2022, in comparison to $8.3 million or 33% for the year ended December 31, 2021. The primary reason for the 5% decline in gross margin decreasedmargins from the prior year was due to higher costs at Enertec in fiscal 2018 to $2.7 million from $4.6 million for fiscal 2017. Gross margin in fiscal 2018 was negatively impacted by the higher cost of ASGA product line sales in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017Israel due to the costs related to rework,strengthening of the US dollar, as well as supply chain issues at Microphase causing large production variances, and refinement of features, the adverse impact of fixed manufacturing overhead upon lower production volume in fiscal 2018inventory write-offs at Microsource and the increase in non-cash charges associated with the impact of a change in estimate of capitalized software development costs and amortizing the remaining cost thereof during fiscal 2018.

Overall gross margin for fiscal 2017 remained relatively flat with fiscal 2016. The Giga-tronics Division gross margin was negatively impacted by inventory parts which were transferred to purchasers of legacy business lines at cost, non-cash charges totaling approximately $477,000 associated with the amortization of capitalized software costs as we began started shipping our ASG TEmS units in fiscal 2017 and unabsorbed factory overhead variances. The increase in Microsource gross margin was primarily due to the increased deliveries of YIG RADAR filters during fiscal 2017 compared fiscal 2016.a decline in orders.

 

Operating expenses were as follows for the fiscal years shown:periods shown (In thousands): 

 

Operating Expenses             % change 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

2018

  

 

 

2017

  2016  

2018

vs.

2017

  

2017

vs.

2016

 

Engineering

 $1,794  $2,254  $2,806   (20)%  (20)%

Selling, general and administrative

  4,076   4,641   5,522   (12)%  (16)%

Total

 $5,870  $6,895  $8,328   (15)%  (17)%
  Year Ended       
Category December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021  $ Change  % Change 
Research and development $2,137  $1,537  $600   39%
Selling and marketing and general and administrative  12,255   9,803   2,452   25%
Impairment of goodwill  10,459      10,459   %
Total $24,851  $11,340  $13,511   119%

 

OperatingTotal operating expenses decreased 15%increased 119% or $1.0$13.5 million in fiscal 2018for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to fiscal 2017. Engineeringthe year ended December 31, 2021. Research and development expenses decreased $460,000 during fiscal 2018 when compared to fiscal 2017increased by 39% primarily due to a decrease in personnel relatedthe $403,000 of expenses duefor the legacy Giga-tronics business for the period of September 8, 2022 to lower headcount. Engineering expenses were also lower in fiscal 2018 due to certain engineers having been assigned to a Microsource nonrecurring engineering project that is recorded as cost of sales. December 31, 2022.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 12% or $565,000increased by 25% primarily due to a decrease in headcount and personnel relatedlegacy Giga-tronics business expenses a decrease in outside services related to management consulting, a decrease in bonuses and commissions as a resultfor the period of the sale of the legacy products to Astronics and Spanawave, and lower lease and facilities costs as a result of the Company’s relocation to a smaller facility in Dublin, California during May 2017.September 8, 2022 through December 31, 2022. 

 

Operating expenses decreased 17%, or $1.4The Company determined that the goodwill of $10.5 million in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. Engineering expenses decreasedassociated with the acquisition of Giga-tronics business was impaired due to lower personnelthe lack of backlog, the decline in revenue and forecasts, and recorded this non-cash impairment within operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Other income (expenses), net were as follows for the periods shown (In thousands):

  Year Ended       
Category December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021  $ Change  % Change 
Interest expense, related party $(482) $(408) $(74)  18%
Interest expense $(739) $(240) $(499)  208%
Change in fair value of marketable equity securities $  $(866) $866   (100)%
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible note $(1,092) $  $(1,092)  %
Foreign currency exchange adjustment $45  $  $45   %
Realized gain on marketable equity securities $  $1,263  $(1,263)  (100)%
Gain on extinguishment of debt $  $447  $(447)  (100)%
Other income (expense) $103  $125  $(22)  (18)%

For the year ended December 31, 2022, interest expense to related expenses as a result of the sale of our switch and other legacy product lines. Engineering expenses were also lower in fiscal 2017 due to certain engineers having been assigned to a Microsource nonrecurring engineering project that is recorded as cost of sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreasedparty was primarily due to a decrease associated with non-cash stock based compensation (primarilyinterest on existing notes at Microphase which were similar in connection with director compensation), a decrease in outside services relatedthe amounts for the year ended December 31, 2021. Interest expenses of notes payable increased by 208% primarily due to management consulting, and a decrease in bonuses and commissions as a result of the sale of the legacy productsexchange rate differences on loans from GWW to Astronics and Spanawave.


Derivative LiabilityEnertec. 

 

On March 26, 2018,September 8, 2022 Ault loaned the Company $4,250,000 and we entered intoissued a modification agreement restructuring of certain terms associated our term loan of $1.5 million from Partners For Growth (“PFG”) made on April 28, 2017, which also included modifying certain terms of outstanding warrants issued in connection with a previous loan made by PFG in 2014. As partsenior secured convertible note. The fair value of this loan modification, we agreed to eliminatenote was $4,392,000 on September 8 and had a $217,000 cash “put” provision in the warrants in exchange for issuing 150,000 shares of our common stock. Prior to the amendment to remove the put provision, the warrants were liability classified, and with market-to-market adjustments through earnings for each reporting period. We estimated the warrants’ fair value at $155,000, prior to the loan modification. The modification of the warrants, to eliminate the put provision, resulted in a reclassification of the warrant from liability to equity. The warrants’ value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model resulted in a revaluation of the warrants of zero value on March 26, 2018. Thede minimis change in fair value at September 30, 2022. The change in the fair value of $155,000this note for the period from September 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022 was recorded as a gain related to revaluation of the derivative liability (see Note 8 to our 2018 Audited Financial Statements, Term Loan, Revolving Line of Credit and Warrants).$1,092,000. 

 

In fiscal 2017, we recorded a gain of $131,000 related to revaluation of the derivative liability associated with the PFG warrants issued in 2014.

44
Table of Contents

 

GainDuring 2021, Gresham was able to extinguish its paycheck protection program loan debt of $447,000 and in addition realized gains on Salemarketable securities of Product Line

In October 2017, we recognized a gain$1.3 million partially offset by the change in the fair value of $324,000 netthese marketable securities of $51,000 of associated expenses related to the sale of legacy products. We received $375,000 from the purchaser during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 but could not recognize the gain on the sale as a result of a dispute with the purchaser. On October 16, 2017, we reached a settlement agreement with the purchaser$866,000. Gresham liquidated these marketable securities in 2021 and the net gain from the asset sale is presentedhad no further gains or losses in our 2018 Audited Financial Statements.

In fiscal 2017, we recognized a net gain of $802,000 associated with the sale of our Switch product line. (See Note 10 to our 2018 Audited Financial Statements, Sale of Product Lines.)

Net Interest Expense

Net interest expense in fiscal 2018 was $461,000, an increase of $328,000 over fiscal 2017. The increased net interest expense in fiscal 2018 was primarily due to the additional interest as a result of non-compliance with certain covenants on the PFG loan and higher loan balances in fiscal 2018.

Net interest expense in fiscal 2017 was $133,000 a decrease of $250,000 over fiscal 2016. The decreased net interest expense in fiscal 2017 was primarily due to the lower principal balances on the PFG loan during fiscal 2017.2022.

 

Net Loss

 

Net loss was $3.1as follows for the periods shown (In thousands):

  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Revenue $30,255  $25,580 
Cost of revenue  21,780   17,231 
Gross profit  8,475   8,349 
         
Operating expenses  24,851   11,340 
Other income (expense), net  (2,165)  321 
Income tax (provision) benefit  123   (193)
Net loss  (18,418)  (2,863)
Net loss (gain) attributable to non-controlling interest  680   (243)
Net loss available to common stockholders $(17,738) $(3,106)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $17.7 million, in fiscal 2018, compared to a net loss of $1.5$3.1 million recorded for the year ended December 31, 2021. The $14.6 million increase in fiscal 2017. The higher net loss recorded in fiscal 2018losses for the year ended December 31, 2022 was primarily due to decreased revenues as well as increases in costhigher operating expenses including the non-cash $10.5 million impairment of sales duegoodwill related to the impactacquisition of GIGA and the non-cash revaluation of the change in estimate related to capitalized software development costs and interest expense discussed above.convertible note of $1,092,000.

 

Net loss was $1.5 million in fiscal 2017, compared to a net loss of $4.1 million in fiscal 2016. The lower net loss recorded in fiscal 2017 was primarily due to increased revenues as well as lower operating expenses discussed above. Net loss was also lower due to the $802,000 gain recorded associated with the sale of the Switch product line in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 as discussed above.Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

Net Inventories

Inventories consistedA Non-GAAP financial measure is generally defined by the SEC as a numerical measure of the following:

Net Inventories             

% change

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 31, 2018

  

March 25, 2017

  March 26, 2016  

2018

vs.

2017

  

 

2017

vs.

2016

 

Raw materials

 $2,290  $1,775  $3,489   29%  (49)%

Work-in-progress

  2,100   2,155   2,156   (3)%   

Finished goods

  561   473   2   19%  2355%

Demonstration inventory

  536   408   47   31%  768%

Total

 $5,487  $4,811  $5,694   14%  (16)%

Net inventories increased by $676,000 in March 25, 2018 from March 25, 2017. The increase was primarily the result of higher raw materials inventory due to the timing of YIG filter production, and increased demonstration inventory to support ASGA sales efforts.


Financial Condition and Liquidity:(Dollars in thousands)

  Fiscal Year Ended 
  March 31, 2018  March 25, 2017 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $1,485  $1,421 

Total current assets

  7,423   7,638 

Total current liabilities

  7,809   7,018 

Working capital

 $(386) $620 

Current ratio

  0.95   1.09 

As of March 31, 2018, Giga-tronics had $1.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $1.4 million as of March 25, 2017. The Company had negative working capital of ($386,000) at March 31, 2018 compared to positive working capital of $620,000 at March 25, 2017. The current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) at March 31, 2018 was 0.95 compared to 1.09 at March 25, 2017. The decrease in working capital was primarily due to the declining revenues and increased net loss during fiscal 2018.

Cash Flows

The following summary of oura company’s historical or future performance, financial position or cash flows forthat includes or excludes amounts from the periods indicated has been derivedmost directly comparable measure under GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative to, our reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. Users of this financial information should consider the types of events and transactions that are excluded from our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this filing:

  

Fiscal Year Ended

 
  

March 31, 2018

  

March 25, 2017

 
         

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 $(1,617) $(56)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

  (688)  809 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 $2,369  $(663)

Cash Flows from Operating Activitiesthese measures.

 

We experienced negativemeasure our operating performance in part based on EBITDA. We also measure our operating performance based on Adjusted EBITDA, which we define as EBITDA adjusted for share based compensation and certain one-time income or expense items. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures that are commonly used, but neither is a recognized accounting term under GAAP. We use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to monitor and facilitate internal evaluation of the performance of our business operations, to facilitate external comparison of our business results to those of others in our industry, and to plan and evaluate our operating budgets. We believe that our measures of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide useful information to the investing public regarding our operating performance and our ability to service debt and fund capital expenditures and may help investors understand and compare our results to other companies that have different financing, capital and tax structures. Neither EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, but as a supplement to, income or loss from operations, net income or loss, cash flows from operating activities, for fiscal years 2018 and 2017 due primarily to operating results.or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

 

Cash used by operating activities duringIn the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 of $1.6 million was primarily attributable tofollowing reconciliation, we provide amounts as reflected in our net loss of $3.1 million and a gain on the sale of a product line of $324,000, offset by non-cash charges of $1.1 million for depreciation and amortization, $251,000 for share-based compensation and a $487,000 increase in deferred rent. Cash flow from our operating assets and liabilities decreased by $83,000 primarily as a result of increased inventories of $676,000, a decrease in accrued payroll and benefits and deferred revenue of $240,000 each, and a $111,000 decrease in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, offset by a $590,000 decrease in accounts receivable, a $365,000 decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets and a $229,000 increase in other current liabilities.


Cash used by operating activities during the fiscal year ended March 25, 2017 of $56,000 was primarily attributable to our net loss of $1.5 million, a decrease of $334,000 in capitalized software development costs, a gain on the sale of a product line of $802,000, and a decrease in accounts payable of $817,000, offset by an decrease in accounts receivable of $1.2 million, a decrease in inventories of $883,000, an increase in deferred revenue of $810,000 due to advance payment arrangements for raw materials with customers and non-cash charges of $827,000 for depreciation and amortization and $286,000 for stock-based compensation.accompanying consolidated financial statements unless otherwise noted.

 

We expect that cash flows from operating activities will fluctuate in future periods due to a number of factors including our operating results, amounts of non-cash charges, and the timingThe reconciliation of our billings, collectionsNet loss to EBITDA and disbursements.Adjusted EBITDA is as follows (In thousands): 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Net loss $(18,418) $(2,863)
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest  680   (243)
Net loss attributable to common shareholders  (17,738)  (3,106)
Depreciation and amortization  663   500 
Interest and taxes  995   716 
EBITDA  (16,080)  (1,890)
         
Adjustments:        
Stock-based compensation  605   629 
Impairment of goodwill  10,459    
Change in fair value of marketable equity securities     (866)
Change in fair value of convertible note  1,092    
Realized gain on marketable equity securities     1,263 
Gain on extinguishment of debt     447 
Adjusted EBITDA $(3,924) $(417)

 

Cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 was $688,000 as a result of leasehold improvements in connection with our facility relocation to Dublin, California.

45
Table of Contents

 

Cash provided by investing activities for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2017 was $809,000 as a result of a $850,000 cash payment from Astronics related to the sale of our Switch product line, as well as a cash payment from Spanawave of $375,000 received during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 related to the sale of our legacy product lines, partially offset by $41,000 of capital equipment expenditures.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 was $2.4 million, primarily due to net proceeds of $1.5 million from a new term loan with PFG and net proceeds of $1.0 million from our sale of Series E Shares.

Cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2017 was $663,000, primarily due to the repayment of our prior term loan with PFG and a portion of our line of credit with Bridge Bank.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We incurred a net loss of $3.1 million and $1.5 million in fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively. These losses have contributed to an accumulated deficit of $28.7 million as of March 31, 2018. We have experienced delays in the development or refinement of features, receipt of orders, and shipments for the new RADAR/EW test system products. These delays have contributed, in part, to the losses and decreases in working capital.

Our new RADAR/EW test system products have shipped to several customers, but potential delays in the development of features, longer than anticipated sales cycles, or uncertainty as to our ability to efficiently manufacture these RADAR/EW test system products, could significantly contribute to additional future losses and decreases in working capital. 

To help fund operations, we rely on advances under the line of credit with Bridge Bank. The line of credit which expired on May 7, 2017, was renewed through May 6, 2019. The credit agreement includes a subjective acceleration clause, which allows for amounts due under the facility to become immediately due in the event of a material adverse change in our business condition (financial or otherwise), operations, properties or prospects, or ability to repay the credit based on the lender’s judgement. As of March 31, 2018, outstanding borrowings and available borrowing capacity under the line of credit were $552,000 and $77,000, respectively.

During April 2017, we entered into a $1.5 million loan agreement with PFG to provide additional cash to fund our operations. As a result of experiencing continued delays in receiving RADAR/EW test system product orders in fiscal 2018, we were unable to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants required by the PFG loan and, as a result, were subject to a default interest rate between June 2017 and March 2018. On March 26, 2018, and concurrent with the execution of certain stock purchase agreements for the sale of new Series E Shares and conditional upon the sale of at least $1.0 million in gross proceeds thereof, we entered into a modification agreement with PFG which provided for the restructuring of certain terms of the PFG loan including resetting of the financial covenants for the remaining loan term (See Note 8 to our 2018 Audited Financial Statements, Term Loans, Revolving Line of Credit and Warrants).

In order to raise additional working capital and to restructure the PFG loan, on March 26, 2018, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of 43,800 shares of a newly designated series of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, or Series E Shares, to approximately 15 private investors. The purchase price for each Series E Share was $25.00. Gross proceeds received by the Company were approximately $1.095 million. Net proceeds to the Company after fees and were approximately $1.04 million. Each Series E Share is initially convertible at the option of the holder at the purchase price of $0.25 per share of common stock, which is 100 shares of the Company’s common stock per each Series E Share.


Additionally, to assist with the upfront purchases of inventory required for future product deliveries, we entered into advance payment arrangements with certain customers, whereby the customers reimburse the us for raw material purchases prior to the shipment of the finished products. We will continue to seek similar terms in future agreements with these customers and other customers.

Management will continue to review all aspects of its business including, but not limited to, the contribution of its individual business segments in an effort to improve cash flow and reduce costs and expenses, while continuing to invest, to the extent possible, in new product development for future revenue streams. Management will also continue seeking additional working capital and liquidity through debt (including debt refinancing), or equity financings, product line sales or potential cessation of unprofitable business product lines. However, there are no assurances that such financings or product line sales will be available at all, or on terms acceptable to us.

Our historical operating results and forecasting uncertainties indicate that substantial doubt exists related to our ability to continue. However, management believes that through the actions to date and possible future actions described above, we should have the necessary liquidity to continue operations at least twelve months from the issuance of the financial statements. However, we cannot predict, with certainty, the outcome of our actions to maintain or generate additional liquidity, including the availability of additional financing, or whether such actions would generate the expected liquidity as currently planned. Forecasting uncertainties also exist with respect to our RADAR/EW test system product line due to the potential longer than anticipated sales cycles, as well as with potential delays in the refinement of certain features, and/or our ability to efficiently manufacture it in a timely manner.

Therefore, the 2018 Audited Financial Statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern; however, the above conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to do so. The 2018 Audited Financial Statements do not include any adjustments that might result if we were unable to do so.

Contractual Obligations

We lease our Dublin, California facility under an operating lease agreement which expires in March 2023. We also lease certain equipment under operating leases. Total future minimum lease payments under these leases amount to approximately $2.5 million, of which $436,000 is scheduled to be paid in fiscal 2019.

We lease equipment under capital leases that expire through September 2020. The future minimum lease payments under these leases are approximately $133,000.

We are committed to purchase certain inventory under non-cancelable purchase orders. As of March 31, 2018, total non– cancelable purchase orders were approximately $1,260,000 and are scheduled to be delivered to the Company at various dates through March 2019.

Results of Operations – Discussion of Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended June 30, 2018 and June 24, 2017.

New orders received by segment are as follows:

NEW ORDERS

            
  

Three Month Periods Ended

     

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30,

2018

  

June 24,

2017

  

%

change

 

Giga-tronics Division

 $52  $   100

%

Microsource

  413   17   NM 

Total

 $465  $17   NM 


New orders received in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 increased to $465,000 from $17,000 received in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Both the Giga-tronics Division and Microsource segment saw increases in orders in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The Giga-tronics Division had minimal ASG orders in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The increase in Microsource business unit orders during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 was attributable to YIG filters orders. The timing of receipt of expected large YIG filter contracts varies from period to period.

The following table shows order backlog and related information at the end of the respective periods:

BACKLOG

            

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30,

2018

  

June 24,

2017

  

%

change

 

Backlog of unfilled orders at end of period:

            

Giga-tronics Division

 $  $444   (100

)%

Microsource

  5,824   8,924   (35

)%

Total

 $5,824  $9,368   (38

)%

             

Backlog of unfilled orders shippable within one year:

            

Giga-tronics Division

 $  $444   (100

)%

Microsource

  3,504   4,058   (14

)%

Total

 $3,504  $4502   (22

)%

Backlog at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2019 decreased 38% comparable prior year date primarily due to the impact of the adoption of ASC 606 on April 1, 2018. The Giga-tronics ASG backlog at June 30, 2018 was zero, a decrease of $444,000 from the comparable prior year date due to the fulfilment of the Navy ASG order. Microsource saw a 35% decrease in backlog in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 which was primarily due the impact of the adoption of ASC 606.

The allocation of net sales was as follows for the periods shown:

ALLOCATION OF NET SALES

            
  

Three Month Periods Ended

     

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30,

2018

  

June 24,

2017

  

%

Change

 

Giga-tronics Division

 $129  $297   (57

)%

Microsource

  2,921   1,694   72

%

Total

 $3,050  $1,991   53

%

Fiscal 2019 first quarter net sales were $3.1 million, a 53% increase as compared to $2.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Revenue allocated to our Microsource division increased 72% in part due to our required adoption of ASC 606 on April 1, 2018, the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year, using the modified retrospective method. Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized as the customer obtains control of the goods and services promised in the contract. Given the nature of our products and terms and conditions in our customer contracts, the customer typically obtains control as we perform work under such contract. Therefore, we expect to recognize revenue over time for substantially all of our contracts using the percentage-of-completion cost-to-cost method. As a result, we are recognizing revenue for these contracts as we incur costs, as opposed to when units are delivered. This change has resulted in earlier revenue recognition in the performance period as compared to the legacy method for those contracts. In addition, increased Microsource RADAR filter sales contributed to our higher revenue for the first quarter fiscal 2019 over 2018.


Net sales for our Giga-tronics Division were $129,000, a 57% decrease from $297,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The decrease was due to lower ASG product shipments. Sales for our Advanced Signal Generator, or ASG were $100,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 compared to $200,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. 

Gross profit was as follows for the periods shown:

GROSS PROFIT

            
  

Three Month Periods Ended

     

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30,

2018

  

June 24,

2017

  

%

change

 

Total

 $1,306  $466   180

%

Gross profit increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 to $1,306,000 from $466,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The higher gross profit was due to an increase in the sales of Microsource RADAR filters of 72% with only a 49% increase in Microsource cost of sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 over fiscal 2018. In addition, the increase in gross profit was partially due to the acceleration of revenue and related profit resulting from our adoption of ASC 606 as described above.

Operating expenses were as follows for the periods shown:

OPERATING EXPENSES

            
  

Three Month Periods Ended

     

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30,

2018

  

June 24,

2017

  

%

change

 

Engineering

 $375  $452   (17)%

Selling, general and administrative

  1,001   1,171   (15)%

Total

 $1,376  $1,623   (15)%

Operating expenses decreased 15% or $247,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 over fiscal 2018. Engineering expenses decreased $77,000, primarily due to a decrease in personnel related expenses due to lower headcount. Selling, general and administrative decreased by $170,000 primarily due to a decrease in headcount and personnel related expenses, a decrease in bonuses and commissions, and lower lease and facilities cost as a result of the Company’s relocation to a smaller facility in Dublin, California during May 2017.

Interest Expense

Net interest expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 was $177,000, an increase of $75,000 over the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Interest expense increased primarily due to the loan modification with PFG effective March 26, 2018, as well as additional interest accrued as a result of our sale of Series E Shares. For the first quarter of fiscal 2019, interest expense includes $50,000 of accretion of discounts on the new PFG loan compared to $22,000 recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.

Net Loss

Net loss for the first quarter of fiscal 2019 was $287,000 compared to a net loss of $1.3 million recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The decrease in net loss was primarily due to the impact of the adoption of ASC 606 as described above.

Financial Condition and Liquidity: (Dollars in thousands)

  Periods Ended 
  June 30, 2018  March 31, 2018 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $748  $1,485 

Total current assets

  5,436   7,423 

Total current liabilities

  4,613   7,809 

Working capital

 $823  $(386)

Current ratio

  1.18   0.95 


As of June 30, 2018, Giga-tronics had $748,000 in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $1.5 million as of March 31, 2018. The Company had working capital of $823,000 at June 30, 2018 compared to negative working capital of ($386,000) at March 31, 2018. The current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) at June 30, 2018 was 1.18 compared to 0.95 at March 31, 2018. The increase in working capital was primarily due to the acceleration of revenue of $596,000, an increase in prepaids and other current assets of $643,000, a decrease in inventories of $2.0 million, a decrease in deferred revenue of $2.7 million all of which resulted from the adoption of ASC 606 during the first quarter of fiscal 2019.

 

Cash Flows

 

The following summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated has been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this filing:Prospectus (In thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended

  Three Months Ended 
 

June 30, 2018

  

June 24, 2017

 
Category March 31, 2023 March 31, 2022 

Net cash used in operating activities

 $(945) $(1,107) $(2,736) $(424)

Net cash used in investing activities

 $  $(620)  (27)  (129)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 $208  $1,443   2,904   470 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  168   (619)
Net increase in cash  309   (702)
.        
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  2,195   1,599 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $2,504  $897 

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

Cash used by operating activities duringDuring the three monthsmonth ended June 30, 2018 of $945,000 was primarily attributable to our net loss, changesMarch 31, 2023, cash used in our working capital accounts, offset by other non-cash charges of $73,000 for depreciation and amortization and $57,000 for share-based compensation. Cash flow from our operating assets and liabilities decreased by $849,000 as a result of increased inventories of $468,000, a $70,000 increase in accrued payroll and benefits, and a $12,000 increase in other accrued liabilities, offset by a $550,000 decrease in deferred revenue, a $516,000 decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $94,000 decrease in accounts receivable, and a decrease in accounts payable of $240,000.

Cash used inthe operating activities was $1.1$2.7 million as compared to $424,000 for the three-month periodthree month ended June 24, 2017. Cash used in operating activities in the first quarterMarch 31, 2022. The primary use of fiscal 2018 resulted primarily from ourcash was to finance net loss of $1.3 million, a decrease of $441,000 in accounts payable, a decrease of $206,000 in accounts receivable and a decrease of $167,000 in deferred revenues. These were partially offset by non-cash charges of $247,000 for depreciation and amortization and an increase of $451,000 in deferred rent.losses.

 

We expect that cash flows from operating activities will fluctuate in future periods due to a number of factors including our level of revenue, which fluctuates significantly from one period to another primarily due to the timing of receipt of contracts, operating results, amounts of non-cash charges, and the timing of our inventory purchases, billings, collections and disbursements.

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

Cash used in investing activities for the three-monththree month period ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2023 was zero.

$27,000 which was due to the purchase of property and equipment. Cash used in investing activities for the three-monththree months period ended June 24, 2017March 31, 2022 was $620,000$129,000 which was primarily attributabledue to leasehold improvements in connection with the Company’s facility relocation to Dublin, California.purchase of property and equipment.

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

Cash provided by financing activities for the quarterthree month period ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2023 was $208,000,$2.9 million which was primarily due to net$2.7 million proceeds of $205,000 from the Company’s issuance of Series Esenior secured convertible preferred stock.

notes and $0.3 million proceeds from receivable, related party offset by $0.1 million payment on notes payable. Cash provided by financing activities for the quarterthree months period ended June 24, 2017March 31, 2022 was $1.4$470,000 which was due to the capital contributions from AAI.

Liquidity

  As of 
Category (In thousands) March 31, 2023  December 31, 2022 
Cash $2,504  $2,195 
Total current assets $20,225  $19,738 
Total current liabilities $15,798  $14,031 
Working Capital $4,427  $5,707 

46
Table of Contents

Our primary sources of liquidity have historically been funded by AAI and in January 2023 by two other lenders who lent the Company $3.3 million. We expect AAI will cease funding the Company in the near future. 

Without the availability of working capital from AAI, unless we are successful in securing additional financing from third parties, we believe that we will not have sufficient cash to meet our needs over the next 12 months including $3,300,000 of convertible notes due on October 6, 2023. Our ability to obtain additional financing is subject to several factors, including market and economic conditions, our performance and investor and lender sentiment with respect to us and our industry. If we are unable to raise additional financing in the near term as needed, our operations and production plans may be scaled back or curtailed and our operations and growth would be impeded.

Our near term fixed commitments for cash expenditures are primarily for payments for employee salaries, operating leases and inventory purchase commitments. Due to the deterioration of the Giga-tronics Division including its Microsource subsidiary, we have lacked sufficient capital to pay our payables. To assist with our liquidity issues, our executive officers have agreed to accept the minimum wage of $1,240 per week and to defer their remaining salaries for a single pay period. We also recently borrowed a total of $100,000 from our Chief Financial Officer and $50,000 from a director. As a result of our liquidity issues, we need to raise approximately $5.0 million to meet our short-term working capital needs, not including the $3.3 million we owe which is due on October 6, 2023. While we are engaged in discussions with AAI and another lender about possible solutions, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in solving our liquidity issues. In addition to risk factors disclosed in this Prospectus, one of the solutions is based upon our common stock beginning to trade actively. We cannot assure you that will occur. 

Our Recent Financings

The AAI Financing

In December 31, 2022 (the “AAI Closing Date”), we entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with AAI, to exchange the Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note due February 14, 2023 in the principal face amount of $4,250,000 dated September 8, 2022 and any accrued interest thereon for a convertible note in the principal amount of $4,382,740 due December 31, 2024 (the “Exchange Note”).

The Exchange Note bears interest at 10% per annum. The Exchange Note is, at the option of AAI, convertible into our common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.78 per share, or (ii) the VWAP Price (as defined in the Exchange Note) on such date less a 20% discount to such VWAP Price, but in no event less than $0.25 per share. In addition, all principal and outstanding interest under the Exchange Note will automatically convert to our common stock upon (i) the consummation of a public offering of securities in which we receive net proceeds (net of underwriters’ discounts and selling commissions) of at least $25 million (a “Qualified Public Offering”), in which case the conversion price shall be the price at which the common stock is sold to the public, provided, however, that no underwriters’ discounts or selling commissions shall be imposed on such conversion, (ii) the consummation of a private or public offering of shares of common stock that is not a Qualified Public Offering but that results in the net proceeds (net of underwriters’ discounts and selling commissions) to us of at least $5 million (a “Non-Qualified Offering”), in which case the conversion price shall be the price at which common stock is sold in such Non-Qualified Offering less a 25% discount or (iii) December 31, 2024, in which case the conversion price shall be the VWAP Price less a 25% discount to such VWAP Price.

Our obligations under the Exchange Agreement and the Exchange Note are secured by a lien on all of our assets and our wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to the Security Agreement dated December 31, 2022 (the “Exchange Security Agreement”), by and among us, our two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Microsource, Inc. and Gresham Holdings, Inc., and AAI.

On the AAI Closing Date, we also entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) by and between us and Ault Lending, whereby we issued Ault Lending a 10% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $6,750,000 (the “Secured Note”) and five-year warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock (the “AAI Warrants”). The AAI Warrants are exercisable for five years from December 31, 2022, at an exercise price of $0.01, subject to certain adjustments. In connection with the issuance of the Secured Note, as of the AAI Closing Date, Ault Lending surrendered for cancellation a term note dated November 12, 2021, in the principal face amount $1,300,000 previously issued by us, including accrued but unpaid interest thereon in the amount of $123,123. In addition, on the AAI Closing Date advances previously made by AAI Lending to us in the aggregate amount of $4,067,469 were rolled into the Secured Note. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, as additional consideration for the issuance of the Secured Note, Ault Lending agreed to provide us an additional $1,259,407 no later than May 31, 2023.

47
Table of Contents

The Secured Note is due December 31, 2024, and bears interest at 10% per annum. The voluntary conversion and automatic conversion price of the Secured Note are similar to the conversion price of the Exchange Note.

With a limited exception, the Senior Secured Note contains a most favored nations provision with respect to our future financings.

With limited exceptions, we also agreed to certain negative covenants that will require the prior approval of the holder of the Secured Note to incur indebtedness (other than permitted indebtedness), enter into variable rate transactions, incur indebtedness for borrowed money, purchase money indebtedness or lease obligations that would be required to be capitalized on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or guaranty the obligations of any other person, in an aggregate amount at any time outstanding in excess of $1,000,000 in any individual transaction or $2,500,000 in the aggregate. Our obligations under the Purchase Agreement and the Secured Note are secured by a lien on all of our assets of and our wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to a Security Agreement, dated December 31, 2022 (the “AAI Security Agreement”) by and among us, our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Microsource and Gresham and Ault Lending and AAI.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we and two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Microsource and Gresham, entered into a Guaranty Agreement, dated December 31, 2022 with Ault Lending. Each such subsidiary guaranteed to Ault Lending the payment of the Secured Note.

In connection with the issuance of the Exchange Note and the Secured Note, we granted AAI and Ault Lending certain mandatory and piggyback registration rights pursuant to two registration rights agreements.

On January 3, 2023 we, AAI and Ault Lending entered into a letter agreement whereby the parties agreed that notwithstanding any obligations in any of the foregoing transaction documents we shall not be required to reserve more than 150% of the shares issuable under the Exchange Note and the Secured Note using $0.78 per share (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends or combinations) plus reservation of one share for each outstanding share issuable under the warrants (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends or combinations).

AAI and Ault Lending are limited to owning no more that 4.99% of our common stock based upon beneficial ownership limitations contained in the Secured Note and the Exchange Note.

AAI has also recent advanced us an additional $165,000. No written documentation exists.

The January 2023 Private Placement

On January 11, 2023, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Lenders pursuant to which the Company sold to the Lenders $3.3 million 10% original issue discount Notes and five-year warrants to purchase a total of 1,666,666 shares of common stock, no par value for total gross proceeds of $3,000,000. The net proceeds were used primarily duefor working capital.

The Notes are secured by our assets pursuant to a Security Agreement entered into for such purpose, and are senior to the indebtedness payable to AAI, pursuant to a Subordination Agreement entered into in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement.

The Notes mature on nine months from the issuance date, or October 6, 2023. The Notes accrue interest at a rate of 6% per annum payable monthly, which increases to 18% upon an event of default. In addition, under the Notes upon an event of default we are required to pay 20% of our consolidated revenues monthly on each interest payment date in reduction of the principal amount of the Notes then outstanding.

The Notes provide for certain events of default which include failure to maintain effectiveness of the registration statement under the Registration Rights Agreement (as described below), suspension of trading of our common stock for five consecutive trading days, failure to timely deliver shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes or exercise of the Warrants, failure to timely make payments under the Notes, default under other indebtedness, and certain other customary events of default, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

48
Table of Contents

Upon an event of default, the holders will have the right to require us to prepay the Notes at a 125% premium. Further, upon a bankruptcy event of default or a change of control event, we will be required to prepay the Notes at a premium. If the conversion price falls below $0.25, we may also elect to prepay the notes at a 125% premium.

Pursuant to the Notes, upon an event of default one of the investors is entitled to cause Jonathan Read, our Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors, to resign from his positions with the Company. Mr. Read executed and delivered to the investor an undated letter of resignation to that effect, which the investor may cause to be dated and released upon the occurrence of an event of default.

The Notes are convertible at a conversion price equal to the greater of (a) 90% of the VWAP for the 10 trading days prior to the conversion date and (b) $0.25 per share, subject to adjustment including downward adjustment upon any dilutive issuance of securities. Each holder’s conversion is subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation which may be increased to 9.99% on 61 days’ notice from the holder.

The Notes contain customary restrictive covenants including covenants against incurring new indebtedness or liens, changing the nature of its business, transfers of assets, transactions with affiliates, and issuances of securities, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

We repaid our existing line of credit with Western Alliance Bank which had an existing balance of approximately $59,000. Under the Notes we can enter into a factoring agreement of $2 million using our accounts receivable as collateral.

The warrants entitle the holders to purchase a total of 1,666,666 shares of common stock for a five-year period from issuance, at an exercise price of the lower of (A) $0.78 and (B) 90% of the lowest VWAP for the 10 trading days prior to the date of the exercise, subject to adjustment including downward adjustment upon any dilutive issuance of securities. Because our common stock will not be listed on a national securities exchange by October 6, 2023, the maturity date of the Notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the warrants will be doubled on that date, without an adjustment to the exercise price.

Each holder’s exercise is subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation which may be increased to 9.99% on 61 days’ notice from the holder. The Warrants may be exercised cashlessly if the registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise is not effective as required under the Registration Rights Agreement.

We are required to maintain a reserve of authorized but unissued shares of common stock initially equal to approximately 15,000,000 shares of common stock, subject to reduction as the Notes and warrants are converted and exercised, respectively.

Spartan Capital Securities, LLC (the “Placement Agent”) served as placement agent in the offering and received a cash commission in the amount of 8% of the gross proceeds, or $240,000. In addition, we paid the Placement Agent an expense allowance of $30,000. Furthermore, we agreed to issue the Placement Agent five-year warrants to purchase a number of shares of common stock equal to 8% of the total number of shares of common stock underlying the Notes and warrants sold in the offering, or 1,200,000 shares. The placement agent warrants have an exercise price of 110% of the warrant exercise price.

Under the SPA we reimbursed the Lenders a total of $60,000 out of the proceeds from the Company’s term loan with PFGoffering for fees and expenses incurred in connection therewith.

We entered into a Registration Rights Agreement pursuant to which was fundedwe agreed to register the resale by the Lenders of the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes and warrants. The Lenders resale of the common stock underlying these Notes and warrants are being included in the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus forms a part.

Present Liquidity

We do not have sufficient working capital to meet our needs for the next 12 months. See “Risk Factors.” Even if we reduce our operations in California and possible elsewhere, we need to complete a material financing which will provide the working capital to support our meeting our backlog and future orders. In addition, we must obtain a financing to repay the $3.3 million Notes due on April 28, 2017.October 6, 2023. Any financing may have onerous terms and be very dilutive to our shareholders. As disclosed elsewhere in this Prospectus, if we default on the Notes, the consequences may be severe and include the resignation of the Chief Executive Officer.

 

49

Table of Contents

 

As of June30, 2023, the Company has approximately $1.7 million in cash mostly in foreign countries. As a result, we have struggled to meet our payroll and have relied on loans from one of our directors and one officer to meet our payroll. See “Related Party Transactions.”

We expect AAI will cease funding us in the near future. Without the availability of working capital from AAI, unless we are successful in securing additional financing from third parties, we believe that we will not have sufficient cash to meet our needs over the next 12 months as well as AAI’s position as a secured creditor or to repay the Notes. As a result of our lack of working capital, we laid off 14 employees which is expected to result in annual savings of $1.4 million.

Our ability to obtain additional financing is subject to several factors, including market and economic conditions, our performance and investor and lender sentiment with respect to us and our industry. If we are unable to raise additional financing in the near term as needed, our operations and production plans may be scaled back or curtailed and our operations and growth would be impeded.

Our near term fixed commitments for cash expenditures are primarily for payments for employee salaries, operating leases, inventory purchase commitments and public company costs. 

SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

This Prospectus covers the Distribution of the Distribution Shares by AAI, as well as the possible resale of or common by the Selling Shareholders identified below. The common stock being offered by the Selling Shareholders are those issuable to the Selling Shareholders upon conversion of various notes and exercise of the warrants. For additional information regarding the issuance of the Notes and the warrants, see “Our Recent Financings” above. We are registering the common stock in order to permit the Selling Shareholders to offer the shares for resale from time-to-time. On September 8, 2022, we acquired Gresham from AAI which had historically provided financing, accounting and financial management support, human resources support and otherwise managed Gresham. AAI has the power under the Series F to designate a majority of our Board; presently three of the seven members of our Board are directors of AAI and our Chief Executive Officer who is AAI’s fourth designee and was originally hired by Gresham at the request of AAI. Except for financing provided by AAI to us this year and the ownership of the notes and the warrants issued pursuant to the applicable Purchase Agreement or Exchange Agreement, as the case may be, the Selling Shareholders have not had any other material relationship with us within the past three years. In addition to the recent advances, AAI is providing some insurance coverage and accounting support.

The table below lists the Selling Shareholders and other information regarding the beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the rules and regulations thereunder) of the common stock held by each of the Selling Shareholders. The second column lists the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the Selling Shareholders, based on their respective ownership of common stock, Notes and warrants, as of the date of this Prospectus, assuming conversion of the notes and exercise of the warrants for cash held by each such Selling Shareholder on that date but taking account of any limitations on conversion and exercise set forth therein. All of the notes and warrants held by the Selling shareholders and the Series F held by AAI have a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation which means they cannot be the beneficial owner of more than 4.99% of our common stock on any given day (the “Beneficial Ownership Limitation”).

The third column lists the common stock being offered by this Prospectus by the Selling Shareholders and does not take in account the Beneficial Ownership Limitations.

In accordance with the terms of a Registration Rights Agreement with the holders of the notes and the warrants, this Prospectus generally covers the resale of the sum of (i) the maximum number of common stock issued or issuable pursuant to the Notes and (ii) the maximum number of common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the warrants, in each case, determined as if the outstanding notes and warrants were converted or exercised (as the case may be) in full (without regard to the Beneficial Ownership Limitations solely for the purpose of such calculation) based on an assumed conversion price and exercise price as footnoted below. Because the conversion price of the Notes and the exercise price of the warrants may be adjusted, the number of shares that will actually be issued may be more or less than the number of shares being offered by this Prospectus. The fourth column assumes the sale of all of the shares offered by the Selling Shareholders pursuant to this Prospectus.

Under the terms of the notes and the warrants, a Selling Shareholder may not convert the notes or exercise the warrants to the extent (but only to the extent) such Selling Shareholder or any of its affiliates would beneficially own a number of shares of our common stock which would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company. The number of shares in the second column reflects Beneficial Ownership Limitation. The Selling Shareholders may sell all, some or none of their shares in this offering. See “Plan of Distribution.”

50
Table of Contents

Name of Selling Shareholder Number of Shares of  Maximum Number of  Number of 
  Common Stock  Shares to be Sold upon  Common Shares 
  Beneficially Owned  Conversion of certain  Owned After 
   Prior to Offering   Notes and the Exercise   Offering and 
       of certain Warrants to   Distribution 
       be Sold Pursuant to this     
       Prospectus (5)     
             
AAI (1)  2,934,985   21,491,003   0 
Ault Lending LLC (2)  311,531   29,000,000   0 
Walleye Opportunities Master Fund Ltd (3)  311,531   8,333,333   0 
Arena Investors, LP (4)  311,531   8,333,333   0 

(1) Mr. Milton “Todd” Ault, Executive Chairman and Mr. William Horne, Executive Officer at Ault Alliance, Inc. (NYSE American: AAI), respectively, may be deemed to have voting power over AAI. The second column consists of the Distribution Shares currently held by AAI and excludes 14,900 shares of common stock held by Digital Power lending, LLC, a subsidiary of AAI. The third column includes the full 21,493,003 shares issuable upon the conversion of the Exchange Note without taking into account the Beneficial Ownership Limitation and does not include the Distribution Shares currently held by AAI, which are being distributed to AAI’s stockholders in the Distribution. The table excludes any shares of our common stock that may be personally held by Mr. Milton C. Ault, III, Executive Chairman of AAI and Mr. Horne, Chief Executive Officer of AAI.

(2)Mr. Ault and Mr. Horne may be deemed to have voting power over Ault Lending. The second column gives effect to the 4.99% Beneficial Ownership Limitation. The third column includes 2,000,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $0.01 per share and 27,000,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of a convertible note in the original principal amount of $6,750,000 at an assumed conversion price of $0.25 per share which is the floor price of the conversion price formula set forth in such note. For columns (2) and (3) we do not give effect to AAI’s beneficial ownership of Ault Lending.

(3)Roger Masi, Portfolio Manager, Walleye Capital may be deemed to have voting power of Walleye Capital. The second column includes 311,531 shares of our common stock and gives effect to the Beneficial Ownership Limitation. The third column includes (A) 6,666,668 shares issuable upon the conversion of a senior secured convertible note in the original principal amount of $1,666,667 at an assumed conversion price of $0.25 per share which is the floor price of the conversion price formula set forth in such note and (B) 833,333 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain warrants which gives effect to a provision therein that the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased thereunder will double on October 6, 2023 if the Company has not completed an uplist transaction as of such date. The exercise price of the warrants is based on a formula equal to the lower of (i) $0.78 and (B) 90% of the lowest VWAP (as defined in the warrant) for the 10 Trading Days (as defined in the warrant) prior to the date of the exercise. For the purpose of this table, we have assumed an exercise price of $0.25 for the warrants. To the extent the exercise price is lower than $0.25, the number of shares of common stock underling the warrants being offered hereby will be higher.

51
Table of Contents

(4)Patrick Vance, Managing Director of Operations may be deemed to have voting power over Arena Investors, LP. The second column includes 311,531 shares of our common stock and gives effect to the Beneficial Ownership Limitation. The third column includes (A) 6,666,668 shares issuable upon the conversion of a senior secured convertible note in the original principal amount of $1,666,667 at an assumed conversion price of $0.25 per share which is the floor price of the conversion price formula set forth in such note and (B) 1,666,666 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain warrants which gives effect to a provision therein that the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased thereunder will double on October 6, 2023 if the Company has not completed an uplist transaction as of such date. The exercise price of the warrants is based on a formula equal to the lower of (i) $0.78 and (B) 90% of the lowest VWAP (as defined in the warrant) for the 10 Trading Days (as defined in the warrant) prior to the date of the exercise. For the purpose of this table, we have assumed an exercise price of $0.25 for the warrants. To the extent the exercise price is lower than $0.25, the number of shares of common stock underling the warrants being offered hereby will be higher.

(5)Assumes conversion price and exercise price, as applicable, of $0.25 (other than the Ault Lending warrant that has an exercise price of $0.01 per share). Also gives effect to the issuance of 833,333 additional warrants to each of Walleye Opportunities Master Fund Ltd and Arena Investors, LP on October 6, 2023, as described in footnotes (3) and (4).

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

For information on the process and administration of the Distribution by AAI, see “Distribution” beginning on page30.

We are registering the common stock issuable upon conversion of certain notes and exercise of certain warrants to permit the resale of these common shares by the holders of the notes and warrants from time to time after the date of this Prospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the Selling Shareholders of the common stock, although we will receive the exercise price of any warrants not exercised by the Selling Shareholders on a cashless exercise basis. We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the common stock.

The Selling Shareholders may sell all or a portion of the common stock held by them and offered hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If the common stocks are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the Selling Shareholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions. The common stock may be sold in one or more transactions at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions, pursuant to one or more of the following methods:

·on any national securities exchange;
·on the OTCQB or any market operated by OTC Markets, Inc.;
·in transactions otherwise than on these exchanges or in the over-the-counter market;
·through the writing or settlement of options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;
·ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
·block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
·purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
·an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
·privately negotiated transactions;
·short sales made after the date the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC;
·broker-dealers may agree with a selling security holder to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
·a combination of any such methods of sale; and
·any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

52
Table of Contents

The Selling Shareholders may also sell common stock under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this Prospectus. In addition, the Selling Shareholders may transfer the common stock by other means not described in this Prospectus. If the Selling Shareholders effect such transactions by selling common stock to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the Selling Shareholders or commissions from purchasers of the common stock for whom they may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal (which discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved). Any such commissions, discounts, or other benefits payable to underwriters, broker-dealers or agents will be subject to FINRA Rules. In connection with sales of the common stock or otherwise, the Selling Shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The Selling Shareholders may also sell common stock short and deliver common stock covered by this Prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed stock in connection with such short sales. The Selling Shareholders may also loan or pledge common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares.

The Selling Shareholders may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the notes, warrants or common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the common stock from time to time pursuant to this Prospectus or any amendment to this Prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act amending, if necessary, the list of Selling Shareholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as Selling Shareholders under this Prospectus. The Selling Shareholders also may transfer and donate the common stock in other circumstances in which case the transferees, donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this Prospectus.

To the extent required by the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, the Selling Shareholders and any broker-dealer participating in the distribution of the common stock may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any commission paid, or any discounts or concessions allowed to, any such broker-dealer may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. At the time a particular offering of the common stock is made, a Prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed, which will set forth the aggregate amount of common stock being offered and the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any broker-dealers or agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation from the Selling Shareholders and any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or re-allowed or paid to broker-dealers.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale securities may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Shareholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of the common stock by the Selling Shareholders or any other person.

We will make copies of this Prospectus available to the Selling Shareholders and have informed them of the need to deliver a copy of this Prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).

Under the securities laws of some states, the common stock may be sold in such states only through registered brokers or dealers. In addition, in most states the common stock may not be sold unless such shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with. We do not intend to register or qualify the Distribution in any states since we believe it does not involve an offer or sale. We intend to file in a limited number of states in order to permit the common stock offered by the Selling Shareholders to be sold directly to market makers.

BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

Through our subsidiaries, we design, manufacture, and distribute specialized electronic solutions, automated test solutions, power electronics, supply and distribution solutions, and radio, microwave and millimeter wave communication systems and components for a variety of applications with a focus on the global defense industry for military airborne, sea and ground applications including high fidelity signal simulation and recording solutions for Electronic Warfare Test and Training applications. We manufacture specializedalso offer bespoke technology solutions for mission critical applications in the medical, industrial, transportation and telecommunications markets. In addition, Relec, is a distributor specializing in power electronics and display products.

53
Table of Contents

The Company was incorporated on March 5, 1980. We acquired Microsource on May 18, 1998.

Business Combination

On September 8, 2022, we acquired Gresham, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of AAI. Upon the consummation of the Business Combination, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Gresham and, in exchange, we issued AAI 2,920,085 shares of our common stock and 514.8 shares of Series F that are convertible into an aggregate of 3,960,043 shares of our Company’s common stock, subject to potential adjustments, and the assumption of Gresham’s outstanding equity awards representing, on an as-assumed basis, 749,620 shares of the Company’s common stock. Immediately following the completion of the Business Combination, Gresham became our wholly-owned subsidiary. In connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, Gresham was deemed to be the accounting acquirer in the Business Combination based on an analysis of the criteria outlined in Accounting Standards Codification 805. While we were the legal acquirer in the Business Combination, because Gresham was deemed the accounting acquirer, the historical financial statements of Gresham became the historical financial statements of the combined company, upon the consummation of the Business Combination.

Gresham was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on November 21, 2018.

We operate both within the United States and at three locations abroad. A summary of our leased locations and high level review of our operations at each facility is provided in the table below. 

NameLocationNature of Business
Corporate headquartersScottsdale, ArizonaOffices
Government RelationsWashington, DCOffice for Business Development and Government Relations
Microsource and Giga-tronics DivisionDublin, California and Nashua, New HampshireOffices, research and development, engineering, sourcing, assembly and testing
Microphase Corporation*Shelton, ConnecticutOffices, research and development, engineering, fabrication, sourcing, assembly, tuning and testing
Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd.Karmiel, IsraelOffices, research and development, engineering, sourcing, assembly, tuning and testing
Relec Electronics Ltd.Wareham, Dorset, England UKOffices, warehouse operations
Gresham Power Electronics Ltd.Salisbury, Wiltshire, England, UKOffices, research and development, engineering, sourcing, assembly, tuning and testing

*63.07% -owned 

Our Industry 

Our operations focus exclusively on the market for electronic solutions that support the defense industry and other mission critical applications, including medical technology, transportation, and telecommunication. The essential nature of these applications provides a degree of insulation from volatility associated with other segments of the global economy while accounting for stability and steady growth of the addressable market opportunities available in segments that we serve. Demand for solutions to meet these requirements continues unaffected, and in many instances increases, in times of global crisis. Total defense spending in the three countries in which we currently operate was expected to total more than an estimated $836 billion in 2023 (https://www.globalfirepower.com/defense-spending-budget.asp). [We sell to the militaries and defense contractors in 15 other countries as well. Overall global defense spending exceeded $2.0 trillion in 2023 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 4.9% to $2.5 trillion through 2028 with U.S. spending continuing to lead the world in the same period (ASD Report, Global Defense Budget Analysis - Forecast to 2028). The current war in the Ukraine, along with tensions with China, North Korea and in the Middle East has intensified interest and investment in defense platforms throughout the United Kingdom, and Europe.

54
Table of Contents

We believe that the drive for increased situational awareness and close coordination of air, land, sea, space and cyber operations will fuel increased investment in defense modernization and force protection, which will drive increased spending in procurement of components and systems to enable electronic warfare, countermeasures and unattended solutions with a CAGR of 5.6% projected in coming years to drive spending in the global defense electronics market to $289 billion in 2028. (Defense Electronics Market Intelligence Report, April 23, 2023). The drive for greater connectivity and analytics will in turn increase demand for RF communications, power electronics and electronic control solutions content in new major military platforms, which are the core offerings of our operating units. 

Thousands of companies compete in this market to deliver electronics solutions to meet defense and other mission critical applications. However, our operating units have longstanding relationships with dominant defense contractors in the US, in the UK, in Israel and other countries who hold contracts for major defense platforms with very long life cycles. These relationships enable us to narrow the field of competition considerably to grow based on repeat business with relatively low selling costs. 

Beyond the defense arena, initiatives to complete $62 billion in upgrades to the current National Railway System in the UK over the next three years while spending $115 billion over the next 10 years to build high speed rail to link London with the Midlands cities of Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester will generate significant opportunities for growth in demand for power electronics to upgrade and replace current infrastructure, both in rolling stock and track side controls. Relec’s current relationships and track record for supplying power solutions to the UK rail industry position us ideally to capitalize on these ongoing refurbishment and expansion efforts. A similarly robust market in the medical power supply markets with a compound annual growth rate of 6.9% to reach $1.8 billion in 2025 creates growth opportunities for Relec in the UK. Increases in contracts for the precision manufacturing of medical diagnostic and calibration tools drive growth opportunities for Enertec as well. The COVID-19 pandemic put healthcare and the medical device industry front and center in the United States, Europe and Asia, fueling interest in the type of power electronics and display solutions that Relec distributes and the health care equipment that Enertec manufactures. 

Our Business Strengths 

We have the following core strengths that we believe give us a competitive advantage: 

·High quality, ultra-reliable bespoke technology offerings with elegant designs and precision “high touch” manufacture that stand the test of time, narrow the field of competition and command enhanced operating margins.
·Enduring relationships with “blue chip” customers in the defense market with diversity in other growth markets such as health care, industrial, transportation and telecommunications provide stable revenue growth and reduce sales cost.
·Substantial backlog of orders with definite delivery dates for solutions engineered into long life cycle platforms that provide revenue base for years to come.
·Global operations expand our market opportunities, extend our operational reach and diversify our business base.

Our Strategy 

Our goal is to become the supplier of choice for usethe major players in militarythe defense industry and provide for solutions for mission critical applications in health care, transportation, manufacturing and telecommunications. 

Our near-term strategies are focused on developing synergies as a result of the acquisition of Gresham:

·Gresham incurred major overhead expenses being a subsidiary of a larger company. Giga-tronics incurred large expenses being a public company with very limited sales. We plan to combine overhead functions and greatly reduce those costs.
·Combine duplicate functions and reduce the costs of sales, human resources, information technologies, quality management and contracts administration.
·Combine the Microphase and Microsource into single subsidiary delivering RF Solutions and reduce operating costs.

In addition, we are focused on securing sufficient working capital to execute on a substantial backlog of orders with definite delivery dates, take on additional significant orders and further improve access to capital resources.

55
Table of Contents

Our long-term strategy includes the following key elements: 

·maintain, strengthen and expand relationships with current customers, by increasing on-time delivery, diversifying solutions offered and maximizing quality of solutions;
·attract new customers through building business development, marketing and sales infrastructure to raise market awareness, identify opportunities early in the process and design in optimally tailored offerings to provide customers competitive advantage;
·take advantage of the cross-selling opportunities among our operating subsidiaries to leverage current resources, reduce time to delivery, minimize selling costs and capitalize on strong customer relationships in other vertical market segments and geographies;
·enhance our geographic footprint by increasing marketing outreach, forming alliances with leading companies located in areas beyond its current reach and acquiring businesses that expand reach into other geographies;
·transfer technology developed for mission critical defense applications to contiguous commercial markets with similar requirements for high quality, ultra-reliable solutions and invest in state-of-the-art technology to enhance its product offerings and production processes; and
·acquire complementary assets and businesses. We believe there are many small well run, profitable defense contractors whose principal owner is nearing retirement which could be attractive acquisition targets.

Our Operations

We conduct our business through our subsidiaries. After the Business Combination, we aligned the operations of our subsidiaries with key market groups as follows. 

 

In the Precision Electronic Solutions group, Enertec and Giga-tronics including Microsource focus on designing, engineering, developing and producing turnkey precision electronic solutions for mission critical applications primarily focused on defense customers and medical instrumentation for large global healthcare products customer. In RF Solutions, Microphase focuses on designing, engineering, assembling, tuning and testing components, integrated assemblies and subsystems that detect, filter, analyze and process radio frequency, microwave and millimeter wave signals for defense applications. Our operations consistPower Electronics and Display Solutions Group consists of two businessGresham Power Electronics focused on providing power electronics solutions to defense customers in the UK and non-U.S. countries while Relec will provide power electronics and displays for mission critical applications to customers in health care, transportation, telecommunications, and industrial businesses. This alignment on market segments thosealso roughly aligns geographically with Precision Electronic Solutions primarily based in Israel, RF Solutions centered in the United States and Power Electronics and Displays in the UK. However, consistent with export controls and international arms regulations, all Gresham operating subsidiaries can offer customers around the world any or all of our subsidiary, Microsource Inc., and thosethe product offerings of our Giga-tronics Division.their sister operating companies. 

 

Microsource primarilyA detailed description of the market groups and associated product offerings follows. 

Precision Electronic Solutions

Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd

56
Table of Contents

Based in Israel, Enertec designs, develops, YIG (Yttrium, Iron, Garnet) tuned oscillators, filters,manufactures and microwave synthesizersmaintains advanced end-to-end high technology precision electronic solutions for military, medical and industrial markets. Those solutions include custom computer-based automated test equipment and turnkey systems to ensure combat readiness, provide command and control, and direct and deploy resources in military operations in harsh environments and battlefield conditions. 

Enertec delivers complete end-to-end project management with requirements definition, systems engineering, design/development, production, testing, integration, field support, maintenance and optimization. Its custom engineered solutions enable and support mission critical air, land and sea military platforms, e.g., missiles, UAVs, combat aircraft, boats, submarines, trailers and satellites. Enertec’s primary customers include the three major defense contractors in Israel. In addition, Enertec has a strategic partnership to build and deliver solutions for the Indian military. 

Enertec designed, developed, and provides precision manufacture for equipment to calibrate cardiac catheters for a global health care products company. This customer recently indicated an intention to have Enertec satisfy all requirements for such devices going forward. This business has grown from 7% of Enertec’s annual revenues in 2021 to 33% of revenues for 2022, with the potential to grow in 2023 and beyond. The customer also has asked Enertec to take on global maintenance, repair and post-delivery support, where Gresham Worldwide’s global presence will facilitate provision of such services which we are planning to implement in the fourth quarter of 2023.

Enertec is among Israel’s largest, most well-established manufacturers of test equipment and simulators. Enertec develops and manufacture test systems and simulators for all types of weapons systems at all levels of maintenance, development, and integration. Enertec is currently working on developing a new generation of electronics cards and assemblies to build a new generation of test systems. Enertec complies with all information security requirements included in its customer contracts as well as all the confidentiality laws that Israel mandates for work related to defense of the country. 

High tech capabilities to deliver advanced electronics solutions create opportunities for other Gresham operating subsidiaries - Microphase, Relec and Gresham Power - to supply components for Enertec solutions. Enertec also provides geographic reach into the Middle East and India to broaden Gresham’s footprint in delivering the highest quality and most advanced electronics technology solutions across the globe. 

Giga-tronics Division

Our Giga-tronics Division designs, manufactures, and markets functional test products and integrates those test products along with third-party hardware and software to deliver solutions for evaluating and validating radar and electronic warfare product performance as well as training personnel. Giga-tronics customers in the past included major United States defense prime contractors, the U.S. armed services and research institutes. Over the last 12 months its business has declined.

RADAR and EW systems are subject to extensive test and evaluation before being deployed and often require periodic re-evaluation during their system lifetime. Although field trials (ground, flight, or naval operations) are the most accurate predictor of operational effectiveness, such exercises are too expensive to rely on exclusively for design feedback. Furthermore, defects uncovered during the field trial stage usually result in major program delays and cost overruns. To reduce this risk, the defense industry relies on simulation in a laboratory setting to save development costs and to identify problems early. 

Simulating the electromagnetic environment that modern weapon systems will encounter when deployed is a challenging problem. Simulators must generate hundreds, if not thousands, of signals simultaneously to replicate the signal dense environment encountered in a modern battlespace. It is also necessary that many of the signals change dynamically over time to simulate movement. These dynamic signals are injected directly into the system under test (“SUT”) in laboratory settings or transmitted via antennas to the SUT during field trials (such as on an open range) for the purpose of predicting the SUT’s operational performance when placed in service. 

Traditional Simulation Approaches

Generating the many simultaneous signals required for a realistic simulation traditionally has been achieved by coordinating the behavior of many separate signal generators. This traditional approach usually results in physically large solutions that typically cost between $8 million and $20 million depending upon the number of emitters simulated and their waveform complexity. These large systems can take more than a year to specify and procure for installation in fixed locations since they are too unwieldy to move easily. The high cost for these systems almost always leads to a time-shared use model. Moreover, the complexity of these systems necessarily demands a large degree of support from the manufacturer to initially program scenarios and later reprogram them as requirements change. 

57
Table of Contents

Giga-tronics Division’s Solution

We constructed a TEmS using an agile, phase coherent wide bandwidth up-converter hosted within the compact industry standard AXIe modular platform. The instrument-grade up converter enables multiple emitters using a low frequency digital waveform generator in a simulator much smaller in size and cost compared to traditional solutions. In addition, the Giga-tronics Division solution includes emitter software that allows users to define their own scenarios without extensive support from us, including dynamic emitters that simulate movement. Although more limited in overall functionality than the traditionally architected solutions, the small size, relatively easy programming, and a starting price point under a million dollars, the TEmS solution greatly increases access to signal simulation capability for test engineers and open range operators in a manner analogous to the way in which the IBM PC increased the availability of computing power to everyone, even though the IBM PC was less powerful than IBM’s namesake mainframes. 

The Giga-tronics Division TEmS solution is already a proven contributor in laboratory environments, such as at prime contractors for product acceptance and at government run installations like the Naval Air Station at Point Mugu California. In addition, the component hardware may be attractive to other builders of custom simulation systems. 

The TEmS solution is smaller in size, lower in cost, and when coupled with a tracking antenna, operates at lower power levels making it an ideal solution for outdoor installations with multiple locations for simulating integrated air defense systems. We believe that outdoor government test facilities are potentially a significant additional source of revenue because our solutions are portable and can be mounted in trucks for use on military bases and in military defense applications. remote locations. Test engineers are using our equipment to generate realistic RADAR signals for air-crew training and in-flight evaluation of EW system effectiveness. We have delivered portable threat emulation solutions to both the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Air Force. This portable application represents a market expansion for our threat emulation solution. In 2022, this Division had $880,000 in revenue with no revenue through March 31, 2023.

Microsource, Inc.

Microsource’s two largest customers are prime contractors for which we developdeveloped and manufactures YIG RADAR filters used in fighter jet aircraft. Revenues from Microsource comprised a majority of our revenues for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017.

Our Giga-tronics Division designs, manufactures and markets a family of functional test products for the RADAR and electronic warfare, or RADAR/EW segment of the defense electronics market. Our RADAR/EW test products are used to evaluate the performance of RADAR/EW systems. Giga-tronics Division customers include major prime defense contractors, the armed services (primarily in the U.S.) and research institutes.

This product platform for RADAR/EW test applications, which we formerly referred to as “Hydra”, has been our principal new product development initiative since 2011 within our test business, replacing our broad product line of general purpose parametric test products.

Microsource

Microsource’s primary business is the design of custom Microwave Integrated Components, or MIC, for the communications and defense electronics markets as well as the production of MIC components using chip and wire assemblies. Modern high performance aircraft require RADAR filters to block electromagnetic inference generated by other electronic systems. Our Microsource Division offers a line of tunable, synthesized Band Reject Filters (BRF) for RADAR/EW applications. These high-speed, tunable notch filters can quickly block interference from continuous wave and narrow-band emissions. Using proprietary driver and PLL technology, these filters offer tuning speeds that are up to ten times faster than open loop YIG filters designs. We design these products specifically for each application.

  FIG 1: Multi-sphere tunable YIG band reject filter

While our RADAR filter technology may be used in a variety of operational applications and as components of a variety of microwave instruments and devices, Microsource’s two largest customers are prime contractors for whom we develop and manufacturemanufactured sophisticated RADAR filters used in fighter aircraft. Microsource’s primary business is the production of YIG based microwave components designed for a specific customer’s intended operational application. Microsource produces a line of tunable, synthesized band reject filters for solving interference problems in RADAR/EW applications as well as low noise oscillators used on shipboard and land-based self-protection systems. Microsource designs components based upon the Company’s proprietary YIG technology, for each customer’s unique requirement, generally at the customer’s expense. Microsource routinely maintains a top-quality rating as measured quarterly by its customers and over the years has received multiple “Gold Supplier” awards. 

Microsource serves the aftermarketmarket for operational hardware associated with the United StatesU.S. Government’s RADAR Modernization Program for prior generation fighter aircraft (i.e., the F/A-18E F-15D and F-16 jets) to extend their useful lives. These RADARMicrosource previously supplied the F-16 but it has recently learned that no further orders are expected. It also supplied the F-15D for which we may or may not receive “limited “end of life” orders. We design these filters are designed to withstand the rigors of operatingoperate under extreme conditions. They mustMicrosource also delivers YIG hardware for shipboard and land-based close-in weapon systems (“CIWS”) used to defend against air and missile attacks.

The U.S. military requirements for Microsource filters in new aircraft have changed and requirements in new aircraft for foreign militaries remain uncertain. Thus, Microsource seeks orders from the prime contractors that build these aircraft for new aircraft for foreign militaries and upgrades to existing aircraft as well as for spare parts and repairs for sustainment of aircraft deployed throughout the world. While the continuing need for Microsource filters appears relatively certain, the timing and volume of orders from the prime contractors remain uncertain as of the date of this Prospectus. As of the date of this Prospectus, Microsource has only a nominal backlog.

Because Microsource has an available facility with equipment and employees, we are focusing in the near term on using Microsource to assist Microphase in fulfilling current customer orders and large anticipated orders. Our plan initially contemplates temporarily deploying California employees to Microphase’s Connecticut facility to train and assist production there while acquiring the capability to make the California operation serve interchangeably as a second manufacturing facility. To date, Microsource employees have visited Microphase’s facility and have been trained.

58
Table of Contents

RF Solutions

Microphase Corporation

Microphase designs, engineers, manufactures, and distributes components, integrated assemblies and subsystems for a variety of military and telecommunications applications. Such components include RF and microwave filters, diplexers, multiplexers, detectors, switch filters, integrated assemblies and Detector Logarithmic Video Amplifiers. Microphase engineers, tunes and tests all its products under stress conditions per defined in tuning protocols and test procedures it developed as part of the production process. This approach ensures that its customers can use and incorporate Microphase products into systems with confidence that the products will perform reliably under extreme operating conditions. 

Microphase’s customers include the U.S. military, and contractors to the U.S. military and to militaries of other countries including prime contractors and sub-contractors. Microphase’s technology innovations are used in many significant U.S. Government defense programs, including the Patriot missile, the F-16, the F-18, the F-35, the JAS Gripen Fighter and the B-1B Bomber. Other notable programs in which Microphase’s products are or were used include the Patriot Missile System and other missile systems, the Ship Signals Exploitation Equipment (SSEE) program, MODI IED countermeasures programs, and drone programs including the Predator, the Reaper and the Shadow. 

Microphase’s advanced technology products enable the ultra-sensitive detection and high precision video amplification that are necessary to accurately recover the signals across wide dynamic range and facilitate use of the information received. These products include: 

filters that sort and clarify microwave signals, including multiplexers that are a series of filters combined in a single package;

solid state amplifiers that amplify microwave signals;

detectors and limiters that are semiconductor devices for detection of radar signals and protection of receivers from damage from high power signals and jamming;

detector log video amplifiers that are fully integrated, ruggedized, “mil-spec” signal detection systems; and

integrated assemblies that combine multiple functions from a range of components and devices, including transmitters, receivers, filters, amplifiers, detectors, and other functionality into single, efficient, high performance, multifunction assemblies.

Microphase recently has undertaken a comprehensive effort to upgrade its production infrastructure and to in-source more fabrication, sealing, wire bonding and finishing processes to increase control over the production processes to lower costs, enhance quality control and reduce lead times. Microphase is continually improving its internal processes to ensure the highest quality and consistent manufacturing of its power solutions. 

Customers routinely acknowledge the quality, reliability and high performance of Microphase offerings. For instance, in April 2023, BAE Systems Electronic Combat Solutions named Microphase Supplier of the Year. 

Power Electronics and Displays

Our subsidiaries in the UK design, develop, manufacture and distribute advanced electronic technology solutions which convert, regulate, purify, manage or distribute electrical power for electronic equipment. Our power solutions support mission-critical defense, health care, telecommunications and transportation applications, and generally convert AC current from the power grid to DC current, or modify the voltage being delivered (DC to DC). Our subsidiaries also offer standard off-the-shelf, modified-standard and purpose-built products. Although our subsidiaries sell standard products unmodified to its customers, those standard offerings are designed into specific customer product configurations in most instances. Our Power Electronics and Displays Group also designs, engineers and builds power systems and display solutions to specific customer requirements for mission critical applications in defense, medicine, transportation, telecommunications and manufacturing. 

59
Table of Contents

Relec

Relec was established in 1978 with the aim of providing specialist power conversion and display products to support professionals in the electronics industry. Relec markets and distributes power electronics and display solutions for mission critical rail, industrial, medical, telecoms and military applications. Gresham acquired Relec in November 2020. 

Relec develops custom solutions for various applications ranging from light industrial to heavily ruggedized for the harshest of environments. Relec customizes product selection feature functionality to achieve optimum performance and service delivery for specific customer requirements. Relec currently operates in specific fields, specializing in AC-DC Power Supplies, DC-DC Converters, Displays and EMC Filters. Approximately 78.2% of Relec’s revenue from the year ended December 31, 2021, 79.6% of its revenue from the year ended December 2022, and 4% for the three months ended March 31, 2023 came from sales to customers within the United Kingdom and the balance came throughout the world.

Gresham Power

Gresham Power is the smallest of Gresham’s operating subsidiaries. In January 1998, Gresham Power was acquired by AAI’s predecessor company. 

Gresham Power specializes in engineering, designing and developing power conversion, power supplies, uninterruptible power supplies and distribution solutions for Naval applications, with equipment installed on virtually all the UK Royal Navy’s submarine and surface fleet. Many of Gresham Power’s ultra-reliable offerings support shipboard distribution of electrical power in emergencies (such as loss of main ship’s power) to enable continued operation of weapons systems, tactical communications and lighting. 

Gresham Power manufactures frequency converters that naval warships use to convert their generated 60-cycle electricity supply to 400 cycles. This 400-cycle supply is used to power their critical equipment such as gyro, compass, and weapons systems. Gresham Power also designs and manufactures transformer rectifiers for naval use. Typically, these provide battery supported back up for critical DC systems, such as machinery and communications. In addition, higher power rectifiers are used for the starting and servicing of helicopters on naval vessels, and Gresham Power now supplies these as part of overall helicopter start and servicing systems. 

Gresham Power specializes in a comprehensive range of activities from PCB and Mechanical Design through prototype development to board and system assembly and test. Its engineers ruggedize marine power products to meet high levels of shock, vibration, harsh climate conditions and the most rigorous MIL STD requirements. In the past, Gresham Power also has deployed its equipment on vessels of the navies of 15 other countries, including Australia, Malaysia, Oman, Spain, Turkey and Japan. Since 2019, customers in the United Kingdom have accounted for most of Gresham Power’s revenues. However, it currently is delivering on a contract to supply power electronics to a large customer in Singapore and is in discussions concerning possible business from customers located in other countries such as India, Australia and Qatar. 

Gresham Power products add diversity to Gresham’s product line, provide greater access to defense customers in the United Kingdom and European markets, and strengthen Gresham’s engineering and technical resources. Customers in the United Kingdom accounted for 69% of Gresham Power’s revenues in 2021, 74% of its revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022, and 43% of its revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2023. Gresham Power’s business was materially and adversely affected by COVID-19 and its impact on the United Kingdom.

Research and Development

We historically have designed and delivered solution and product offerings with relatively long product life cycles. However, the electronics industry is subject to rapid technological changes at the component level. Our future success is dependent on our ability to steadily incorporate new functionality and advancements in component technologies into our new products. 

Our engineering and product development efforts vary with each operating subsidiary. Most of these efforts focus on designing and developing new products in connection with custom product design and modification of standard electronics offerings to provide solutions tailored to specific customer requirements. Our engineers work closely with customers and specialist partners to incorporate modifications or create custom designs for specific project requirements. In 2021, prior to the business combination, Microphase, Enertec and Gresham Power, incurred independent research and development cost in an aggregate amount of $1,537,000, or 6% of Gresham’s consolidated operating revenues. In calendar 2022, the research and development expenditures were approximately $2,137,000 or 7.1% of revenue. During the first six months of 2023 the Company’s research and development expenditures were $1,442,000 or 8.2% of revenue

60
Table of Contents

Enertec provides full-service design and development of turnkey Precision Electronic Solutions. Microphase designs custom RF solutions to meet customer unique specifications. When required, other subsidiaries modify standard products to meet specific customer requirements, including, but not limited to, redesigning commercial products to meet requirements for military applications based on commercial off-the-shelf products and for other customized product requirements, when applicable. We continually seek to improve our product offerings while anticipating changing market demands for increased functionality, customized firmware and improved EMI (electromagnetic interference) filtering. Whenever possible, we attempt to differentiate all of our products from commodity-type products by enhancing, modifying and customizing standard product offerings as well as refreshing and enhancing custom designs to meet a broader array of applications. 

The legacy Giga-tronics business historically has funded product development activities internally, through product line sales, or through outside equity investment and debt financing. Product development activities are primarily expensed as incurred except for software capitalization of labor cost of $101,000 for internally developed software as of December 31, 2022. Microsource and Microphase typically have designed, engineered and developed new product offerings in close collaboration with and funded by its customers. 

There can be no assurance that future technologies, processes, or product developments will not render our current product offerings obsolete or that we will be able to operate while exposeddevelop and introduce new products or enhancements to the shock, vibration and temperature extremes experienced during jet flight and must be ableexisting products that satisfy customer needs in a timely manner or achieve market acceptance. Failure to operate using convection and radiation cooling only with no heat sinking to aircraft.


Our customers require that Microsource be certified to the stringent AS9100D aerospace quality standard. Microsource routinely maintains a “gold supplier” rating from its customers and received the Supplier of the Year award from one ofdo so could adversely affect our systems integrator customers.business. 

 

Microsource’s revenues have grown as prime contractors have begun upgrades on additional aircraft. Initially Microsource supplied filters for one fighter jet, the F/A-18E, with an average revenue stream of $927,000 per quarter during the 2012 and 2013 fiscal years. In our 2014 fiscal year, the prime contractor added a second aircraft, the F-15, increasing the revenue to an average of $1,772,000 per quarter for the combined 2014, 2015 and 2016 fiscal year period. During our 2017 fiscal year, a second prime contractor added a third aircraft, the F-16, and Microsource’s revenue climbed again to an average of $2,026,000 per quarter for the combined period including fiscal years 2017 and 2018 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 (in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 the Company reported revenue using ASC 606. Using ASC605 accounting, the revenue for Q1FY19 would be $2.3M and the average revenue for FY17, FY18, and Q1FY19 would be $1.96M).Competition

 

The following table illustrates Microsource’s revenue growth duringdefense electronic technology solutions industry is highly fragmented and characterized by intense competition. Our competition includes thousands of companies located throughout the period including fiscal years 2012 through 2018 and the first quarterworld, some of fiscal 2019, in which we delivered approximately 500 filters during this time period (dollars in thousands).

 

We expect our filter technology will continue to be a significant source of our revenue. There are over 3,000 potential domestic and foreign F-15, F-16 and F-18 aircraft that have not been upgraded, likely requiring multiple filters per aircraft. We may also have the opportunity to develop and sell RADAR filters to customers for other types of aircraft.

Giga-tronics Division

Our Giga-tronics Division designs, manufactures and markets a family of functional test products for the RADAR and electronic warfare, or RADAR/EW segment of the defense electronics market. Our RADAR/EW test products are used to evaluate the performance of RADAR/EW systems. Giga-tronics Division customers include major prime defense contractors, the armed services (primarily in the U.S.) and research institutes.


The original Giga-tronics product line consisted of a general purpose parametric test products used for the design, production, repair and maintenance of products in the aerospace and telecommunications equipment marketplace. As the general purpose test market became a commodity business, our revenues and gross margins declined, as illustrated in the following table (revenues of commodity test business, dollars in thousands):

In 2011, we decided to divest of this declining commodity business, and to build on our Microwave expertise and our familiarity with RADAR systems by focusing on the RADAR/EW test market. We believe the RADAR/EW test product market offers greater long-term opportunities for revenue growth as the demand for testing equipment may increase as RADAR/EW systems become increasingly complex. We also believe the RADAR/EW test market offers improved gross margins compared the general purpose test equipment marketplace because our RADAR/EW test systems involve proprietary and highly specialized technology.

Today, the Giga-tronics Division designs, manufactures and markets a family of functional test products aimed primarily for testing RADAR/EW equipment. These functional products represent building blocks in the construction of test systems used to validate the performance of RADAR/EW equipment, and they comprise our Advanced Signal Generation and Analysis System or ASGA.

RADAR/EW Testing Technology

The RADAR/EW test environment is challenged today by the extreme complexity of the RADAR and countermeasure devices. RADAR and countermeasure devices may be cognizant, meaning that they recognize each other, and adaptive, meaning that they adapt to what they recognize, changing their behavior. For example, if a RADAR determines that it is being jammed, it will change its signals to avoid the jamming. This greatly adds to the challenge of testing these devices due to the nearly endless combination of possible outcomes. Our customers employ a test methodology called “Hardware-in-the-loop” (HIL) as the only means to perform meaningful tests on these devices short of field and flight trials. Adding to the complexity is that multiple RADARs from multiple aircraft may work together, while multiple jammers try to fool the multiple RADARs.


RADAR/EW designs and testing requirements are very specific and vary depending on the aircraft and its mission and developments in RADAR/EW countermeasures. This specificity and complexity require customized test solutions for each test situation. Such solutions may cost more than $10 million per test system, and have high cost of ownership, often requiring lengthy (several hours) and frequent calibration. Further, testing complex RADAR/EW devices requires a system with multiple channels; traditional test solutions were not designed for this application and do not scale welladvantages in terms of sizelabor and component costs, and some of which may offer products superior or costs.

Giga-tronics’ Solution

We developed our ASGA test systemscomparable in quality to address these challenges with three primary goals:

1.

Our solution, which combines our ASGA platform with digital processing hardware and firmware, provides a test solution that may be customized with relative ease compared to traditional test systems.

2.

Our ASGA solution was designed specifically for Hardware-in-the-Loop HIL testing and offers a real-time, dynamic, closed loop test solution that simulates theses adaptive/cognitive RADAR/EW devices for RADAR design and testing purposes.

3.

Our ASGA solution is scalable, allowing us to build test systems with multiple channels that scale well both in terms of size and costs compared to traditional systems.

We are developing our testingus. Each operating subsidiary confronts a different set of competitors depending on solutions offered, vertical markets targeted and simulation platform in phases:

Initially, we developed a subsystem that replicates the radio frequency (RF) environment that the device being tested, such as a RADAR or jammer, will experience when it is placed in service to allow an accurate assessment and improvement of its effectiveness prior to deployment. We call this subsystem an Advanced Signal Generator, or ASG.

Next, we developed subsystem solutions for recording both the RF stimulus from the infrastructure and the RF responses from the device being tested. The recordings may be used subsequently to analyze and determine whether the device is operating correctly and to improve its effectiveness. We call this subsystem an Advanced Signal Analyzer, or ASA

Next, we began to develop a complete test solution by combining our ASG with a digital generation system from a third party vendor

Finally, we are working on a closed loop solution by combining the ASGA with the digital generation and analysis systems

The developmentsgeographic scope of the ASG and ASA subsystems as well as the full system solution with digital generation are complete and have been delivered to customers. We continue to develop our closed loop solution.


We developed our ASGA solution in three phases. First, building on our microwave RADAR component expertise, we developed a Microwave Up-Converter, a Down-Converter, and a Power Amplifier. Second, we developed an open loop Radar/EW Test solution, allowing us to offer a complete test system as opposed to providing subsystems only. Finally, we are combining our ASGA solution with proprietary with digital processing hardware and firmware, to create a closed loop test solution that may be customized with relative ease compared to traditional systems.

ASGA

Building on our Microwave RADAR component expertise, we developed a custom Microwave Up-Converter, Down-Converter, and Power Amplifier as shown below:


Providing “custom” test solution requires an architecture that can easily be adapted to different test requirements. The common testing systems architecture uses an analog RF (Radio Frequency) synthesizer followed by an IQ (in-phase, quadrature) modulator. This analog architecture does not lend itself to easy customization or closed loop testing. Our Giga-tronics products employ a digital front-end at lower Intermediate Frequencies (IF) while the complex RF Microwave sub-system is isolated and remains unchanged. This paradigm shift of replacing the synthesizer with an up-converter has many other advantages: (1) It mimics the architecture of real RADARs, which makes it an optimum fit for HIL test approaches, (2) it allows the RADAR/EW engineers to work in a manner they are accustomed to and (3) it is easily upgradable to implement the latest threat scenarios.

Our microwave sub-system includes individual calibrated transmit channels called the Advanced Signal Generator (ASG) and individual calibrated receive channels called the Advanced Signal Analyzer (ASA). A System Reference Module (SRM100A) shared between the ASG and ASA modules along with an industry standard AXIe chassis completes the platform. The platform’s architecture facilitates building test systems with reduced size, weight and cost compared with traditional solutions, especially when the test system is required to have multiple transmitters and receivers.


Customers typically integrate the ASG sub-system with third party hardware and software to form a specific test solution for each RADAR/EW asset to be validated. We have sold these sub-systems to self-integrators as shown below

in $

Custom Test Solutions

In 2017, we moved into the second phase, providing complete custom test solutions rather than just sub-systems. Some examples of test solutions integrated by Giga-tronics are our Real-Time Threat Emulation System (TEmS) and the Multi-Aircraft signal generator sold to the US Navy at its Naval Air Station in Pt. Mugu, California as shown below:


Closed LoopCustom Test Solutions

We are currently entering the third phase in our 2019 fiscal year, providing a closed loop test solution. This is achieved by “mirroring” the up-converter to make a companion down-converter:

By using the identical architecture and components for the down-converter, our testing solution achieves the ability to pick out and follow a single emitter within a dense signal environment – a critical capability for building a closed loop simulation of a RADAR or Countermeasure device.

This microwave sub-system is then complemented with our customized digital processing hardware and firmware to create our closed loop test solutions where customization for a specific RADAR /EW system test is performed at the digital level, without changing the microwave subsystem.


With over $10 million of test systems installed and being utilized by 8 customers, we believe our ASGA solution has been validated.

Our Microsource RADAR filters business continues to be a reliable base business. It generated an average of $7 million in annual sales over the past three fiscal years, with 40% in average annual gross margins over the same period. As a sole source supplier with respect to the F-14s, F-15 and F-18 upgrade programs, we believe this will continue to be a reliable source of revenue over the next several years.


Summary

In summary, we have completed a difficult transition, divesting our commodity test business and investing heavily in our RADAR/EW test business. This transition is now complete. In our 2018 fiscal year, we reduced operating expenses by 30% compared to fiscal 2016, our gross margins during the last two quarters increased from the mid 20% to above 40%, resulting in an operating loss of $70,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, compared to an operating loss of $1.16 million during the same quarter one year earlier:

Corporate Strategy

Our objective is to maintain our position as a sole source provider of RADAR filter solutions for prior generation fighter jet aircraft and to become a leading supplier of electronic test systems to government facilities and defense prime contractors tasked with evaluating the performance of RADAR/EW systems. Key elements of our strategy include:

Penetrate Our Core Markets

We believe our RADAR/EW test solutions offer significant competitive advantages compared to traditional testing systems. We intend to capitalize on our technology leadership to further our market share position in our core markets, where are customers include the US Navy, US Air Force and US Army and prime contractors and test directorates who are developing the devices being tested at the military bases.


Refine our Sales Strategy

Selling custom test solutions required that we change our sales methodology, as we shifted from selling parametric test instruments “boxes” to working with potential customers in a business development approach. As such, we have changed our sales team to a business development team comprised of people who know our customers and potential customers, understand their needs and are able to propose test solutions. We are developing a field sales force, locating personnel near key military and OEM customers within the RADAR/EW marketplace. This salesforce will have the technical expertise needed to properly understand our customer’s needs and provide the optimal solution to position our highly complex, innovative platform.

Provide Proactive Customer Support

We are developing strategic relationships with on-base contractors to provide on-site support for our fielded test systems. We believe this is critical in the success of operating systems of this complexity. We plan to establish additional locations as our customer base grows.

Enter New Geographic Markets Rapidly

We intend to bring our RADAR/EW test solutions to new international markets. To do so, we will rely on our relationships at key prime contractors and military customers in France, Israel, Italy and the United Kingdom, for example.operations. We also expect to use sales representative organizations that have relationships with prime contractorsface competition from current and technical expertise in radar testing.

Expand the Microsource component business

We believe our YIG based tracking filter technology is positioned well with prime fighter aircraft manufacturers. We expect our filter technology will continue to be a major source of our revenue. Our goal is to take technology from the RADAR/EW test platform, miniaturize and ruggedize with our chip and wire technology, and provide additional Microwave modules to the same prime manufacturers to whom currently provide our test solutions.

Competition

We primarily compete in two different products markets: Microsource’s RADAR filters and Giga-tronics RADAR/EW test systems.

Microsource

Microsource is a sole source supplier serving the aftermarket for operational hardware associated with the US Government’s RADAR Modernization Program (RMP) for prior generation fighter jet aircraft (i.e., the F/A-18E, F-15D and F-16 jets) to extend their useful lives. Our Microsource division supplies YIG filters specifically designed for military aircraft to solve interference problems caused by newer, more powerful RADARs. The prime contractors responsible for integrating the new RADARs have over several years flight qualified our filters at considerable expense. Only a few other companies possess the technical know-howprospective customers who may decide to design and manufacture filterspower electronics, communications components and precision electronic solutions needed to satisfy their internal programmatic requirements. 

Consolidation in the defense technology solutions market, including through mergers, acquisitions and/or strategic alliances among major primes to whom we sell our products, has the potential to intensify the competitive pressures that it faces. Many of this nature,its existing and potential competitors may be better positioned than us is to acquire other companies, technologies or products. We compete favorably on the basis of multiple factors, including product quality and reliability, technological capabilities, service, past performance, design flexibility and ability to develop and implement complex, integrated solutions customized to its customers’ needs, and cost-effectiveness. Focusing on bespoke technology offerings with relatively low volumes and high margins enables our operating subsidiaries to compete favorably on price against larger companies with much high indirect cost structures (overhead and G&A) and cumbersome internal bureaucracies. Finally, the fragmentation of the defense technology market also creates opportunities to grow through acquiring competitors and/or potential competitors. 

Precision Electronic Solutions

Enertec faces direct competition from smaller firms than itself such as TeledyneNir Or, EPS, MER, Alexander Schneider, Symcotech and Micro-Lambda Wireless, but we believeChaban, which specialize in components of Precision Electronic Solutions. Offering end-to-end, turnkey solutions gives Enertec a competitive advantage over other private contractors competing to provide the expenseIsraeli MOD and major OEMs with electronic systems and components. That competitive advantage enables Enertec to significantly narrow the field of developingcompetition with little viable competition. Enertec’s performance in the precision manufacture of the calibration machines for cardiac catheters also has enabled it to excel against the competition and requalifyingsteadily increase its share of building the devices as well as establishing a new component is prohibitivetrack record of excellence to the point where the prime contractor would only undertake such an effort if significant issues, such as significant technical deficiencies, were to arise.build other medical devices requiring a similar level of precision. 

 

61
Table of Contents

Giga-tronics Division

 

The Giga-tronics Division serves the electronic testdefense electronics market with a microwave test platform used in the evaluation of military RADAR/EW systems. These applications representThis application represents a niche segmentssegment within the broader test equipment market. While thethis niche market segmentssegment of RADAR/EW aretesting is large enough to be meaningful to Giga-tronics,the Company, we believe they areit is too small to attract larger competitors, such as Agilent/Keysight, Rohde & Schwarz and National Instruments who, to our knowledge, do not approach these markets with new dedicated solutions.


 

We have developed a unique approacharchitecture to address the RADAR/EW test requirements that are adaptive/cognitive. Testing these new RADARresults in systems smaller in size and jamming (i.e. interference) signals is best solved by a real time, closed loop, dynamic simulation system. We believe our Giga-tronics RADAR/EW solutions present a paradigm shift providing a closed loop test capability that is unavailable elsewhere.lower in cost than available solutions. Our competitors often have greater resources in research, development and manufacturing and substantially broader product lines and channels. To compete, we place strong emphasis on maintaining a high degree of technical competence as it relates to the development of new microwave products, we are highly selective in establishing technological objectives and focus our sales and marketing activities in the selected niche areas that are weakly served or underserved by our competitors. Competitors that make alternative equipment to the Giga-tronicsCompany’s Advanced Signal Generation and Analysis (ASGA)Generator & Analyzer (“ASGA”) system include ELCOM (a division of Frequency Electronics Inc.), COMSTRON (a division of Cobham Plc)VIAVI, and EWST (a division of Ultra Electronics Plc). Compared to Giga-tronics, these competitors

Northrop Grumman’s CEESIM and Textron System’s A2PATS simulators are two examples of comparable size or have small product divisionstraditionally architected simulation equipment that compete with more limited product lines. Twothe Company’s TEmS solution, although their solutions are much larger companies, Northrop Grumman/Amherstin size and Textron/AAI sell open loop equipment that competes with the Giga-tronics ASGA solutions, albeit athave a much higher selling price. TheseAn example of a traditional fielded simulator is Northrop Grumman’s Joint Threat Emitter (“JTE”). The JTE offers a high-fidelity replica of a potential adversary’s air defense RADAR for training combat pilots and improving air-crew survivability. Each JTE is designed to replicate specific threat radar signals, transmits at high-power levels, and cannot be easily reprogrammed to different threats. At nearly multimillion price per unit, the JTE is very expensive for simulating a modern integrated air defense system and because it transmits at high power levels, its use is restricted. 

Microsource historically supplied the market for filter components associated with the U.S. military’s RADAR Modernization Program for certain prior generation fighter jet aircrafts (F-15D, F-16 and F/A-18E jets) and for oscillators in shipboard and land-based missile defense systems. With the U.S. military scaling back these fighter aircraft programs, the volume and timing of future orders of Microsource filters for these jet fighters remain uncertain as of this Prospectus. We currently have only nominal backlog for these programs. Microsource provides filters specifically designed for military aircraft to solve interference problems created when newer, more powerful RADAR systems are installed on older aircraft without a corresponding upgrade to the onboard self-protection electronics. Only a few other companies possess the technical know-how to design and manufacture YIG components of this nature, such as Teledyne and Micro-Lambda Wireless. 

RF Solutions

Many competitors for our RF Solutions group, including K&L Microwave, Qorvo, Q Microwave, and Gowanda Electronics, have substantially greater financial and marketing resources and geographic presence than we have. However, elegant designs, strong engineering and a long history of delivering high quality, ultra-reliable components and subsystems enable Microphase to compete very effectively and carve out a strong position against competitors with more resources. 

Maintaining focus on strong engineering and precision manufacture of purpose-built RF solutions for defense applications in the air, on land and at sea has enabled Microphase to compete well for requirements of the armed services and the prime contractors that serve them. In 2023, continued improvements in on-time delivery and product quality increased bookings, contributed to growth in Microphase’s backlog of orders and laid the foundation for new orders in direct competition to take market share against larger and better funded companies. Current customers have expanded business with Microphase while several large defense contractors from the ranks of former customers have returned to put new orders in with Microphase. Diversification of the business has continued into 2023 with existing customers continuing to order more products while also initiating development of new and next generation solutions.

Power Electronics and Displays

Gresham Power faces competition from Ultra Electronics and Rolls Royce. As in the case of Microphase, elegant designs, strong engineering and a long track record for delivering ultra-reliable high quality power electronics solutions enables Gresham Power to compete effectively. Customers continue to seek out Gresham Power to provide power systems for marine defense applications. Gresham Power also won a sizable contract in 2022 to provide power electronics for land-based vehicles in Singapore, representing a significant expansion into the market for power solutions beyond marine defense. Gresham Power looks to book a follow-on order with that customer in the second half of 2023. 

62
Table of Contents

Relec competes against many other distributors of power electronics and display offerings, facing competition from Fidus Power Ltd., Mouser Electronics and Avnet Abacus as well as power supply and electronics manufacturers like XP and ABB who sell direct, many of which have significantly more fiscal and marketing resources than Relec. However, a high touch, customer-focused approach enables Relec to compete effectively against high volume distributors and direct selling manufacturers. Optimizing and designing solutions into customer product lines has proven tremendously effective in building relationships with customers and suppliers alike that endure over time, generating regular repeat business and builds a reputation for customer service that provides a strong competitive advantage when pursuing new customers. 

Manufacturing and Testing

We fabricate components and performs product assembly, integration and testing of its product offerings at production facilities in Dublin, California (Microsource and the Giga-tronics Division), Shelton, Connecticut (Microphase), Karmiel, Israel (Enertec) and Salisbury, England (Gresham Power). Each of our operating business has built a robust network of trusted supply chain partners to provide components, materials and parts for assembly into products or products for resale. 

We continually strive to improve our production and test systemsprocesses, to ensure the highest quality and consistent manufacturing of its solutions. Each operating business maintains rigorous quality control to ensure that our solutions conform to all customer specifications and will perform reliably in the customer’s application. We test our products under stress operating conditions per defined test procedures we developed in conjunction with our customers. This approach ensures that our customers can use its solutions right out of the box on their production line or installed directly in the field. We offer customer specific testing services with custom designed tests to simulate operation within our customer applications. 

All operating units comply with all applicable safety and EMC standards for electronics solutions. 

Compliance with international safety agency standards is critical in every application, and power solutions play a major role in meeting these compliance requirements. Our safety engineers and quality assurance teams help ensure that our custom products are designed to meet all safety requirements and are appropriately documented to expedite safety approval processes. 

We maintain ISO 9001:2008 (Enertec), ISO 9001:2015 (Microphase, Gresham Power and Relec) and AS9100D (Enertec, Microphase, Microsource and the Giga-tronics Division) certification in our manufacturing operations. ISO 9001 and AS9100 are universally recognized and accepted international standards for quality management. 

Customer Service and Support

Our operating companies offer a “high touch” approach to optimizing and customizing solution offerings to meet customer unique requirements. Working closely with customers, we design, engineer, develop and produce offerings to the highest standards of performance, durability and reliability to meet unique customer requirements. All operating units constantly track performance against cost, quality and on-time delivery metrics with an intense focus on customer satisfaction. Following the Business Combination, regular communications and direct collaboration at all levels with customers have become hallmarks of all our operations.

Given the mission critical nature of the customer applications which our product and solution offerings support, we respond promptly and take necessary corrective action to ensure our offerings conform to the specifications and work to that specific customer’s expectations. We provide warranties on all products offered. The length and terms of the warranties vary with the product type and application in which the product gets used. In addition, even after warranties expire, our operating units will provide maintenance, repair and post-delivery support for the full expected life of the product. For instance, Gresham Power designs and builds the ruggedized power electronics that it provides to the Royal Navy to last for 25 years while Microphase and Microsource routinely design and manufacture RF solutions for military applications to have a product life typically of 15 years or more. 

Suppliers

Substantially all the components required to make our assemblies are available from Northrup Grumman and Textronmore than one source. We occasionally use sole source arrangements to obtain leading-edge technology or favorable pricing or supply terms, but not in any material volume. In our opinion, the loss of any sole source arrangement we have longwould not materially affect our operations, though we could experience production delays as we seek new suppliers or re-design components of our products. Some suppliers are also competitors of ours. In the event a competitor-supplier chooses not to sell its products to us, production delays that could significantly affect our business could occur as we seek new suppliers or re-design components of our products. 

63
Table of Contents

Although extended delays in receipt of components from our suppliers can result in longer product delivery schedules represent expensive capital investmentsfor us, we have mitigated this risk by dealing with well-established suppliers and maintaining good relationships with such suppliers. Our operating entities also build in adequate time in delivery schedule commitments to our customers to account for the longer delivery lead times. We also anticipate that ending of the COVID-19 pandemic and resolution of other factors that have roiled supply chain markets in the past three years will reduce the turmoil in the supply chain, shorten delivery lead times, increase availability of parts and allow a return to more normal supply chain patterns of operation. 

Our operating business purchase electronic components, materials, parts and assemblies, including power supplies, converters, transformers, rectifiers, inverters, housings, blocks, covers, machined parts, substrates, resistors, diodes, detectors, amplifiers, integrated circuits, printed circuit boards, cables, connectors, metal work, and capacitors, from outside suppliers. We also purchase certain precious metals used in manufacturing of our products (plating, sealing, painting, finishing). We carefully select suppliers based on their ability to provide quality parts and components which meet technical specifications and volume requirements. For defense work, our subsidiaries have built supply chain networks from sources in the U.S. (Microphase, the Giga-tronics Division and Microsource source exclusively from the U.S.), Enertec and Relec also source from the U.S.), the UK (Gresham Power, Relec) and Israel (Enertec) with no sourcing from China. Relec does work with suppliers in China for some commercial applications. 

We have put considerable effort into ensuring that the required components and raw materials are available from a variety of sources, and we typically do not depend on any one supplier for any critical work. However, for a very few components we still rely on a limited number of suppliers and certain components remain sole source. For the most part, however, parts and materials used in its offerings will have at least two approved sources. 

Customers

Prior to the Business Combination, U.S. and international defense-related agencies and their prime contractors accounted for 100% of the legacy Giga-tronics business’ net revenue in the 2021 and 2022 fiscal years. With the Business Combination the Company has a more diversified customer base comprised primarily of the U.S. military and allied militaries, including Israel and the United Kingdom, and defense contractors in the United States, Europe, Middle East, and South Asia, including prime contractors and sub-contractors, with more than 1/3 of its business coming from commercial customers.

Gresham’s defense customers include the Israeli Ministry of Defense and Israel Air Industries (“IAI”), Rafael and Elbit Systems, the three major defense contractors in Israel, the United States Department of Defense (“U.S. DOD”) and major defense contractors such as BAE Systems North America, L3Harris, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Sierra Nevada Corporation in the U.S., the UK Ministry of Defense, including the Royal Navy, and major defense contractors in the United Kingdom and Europe, including BAE Systems PLC, a British multinational defense, security, and aerospace company, Rolls Royce, Babcock and Thales, SAAB (Sweden), Indra (Spain) and Aselsan (Turkey). In addition, Enertec has a strategic partnership through IAI with Cyient to build and deliver solutions for the Indian military. 

Gresham’s commercial customers include Elma GmbH, BioSense Webster, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson (a key Enertec customer), RS Components, Farnell, Parker Hannifin, Vanderbilt, Bombardier.

On April 6, 2023, the Electronic Combat Solutions business group of BAE Systems’ Electronic System Sector named Microphase as a “Partner 2 Win” Supplier of the Year in a ceremony in Austin, Texas. 

64
Table of Contents

For the three months ended March 31, 2023, Gresham’s top six customers accounted in the aggregate for 59% of its consolidated revenues. The following table describes Gresham’s customer concentration as of March 31, 2023, based on the percentage of revenue for the three month period ended March 31, 2023:

  Revenue  % of Total 
Customer (In thousands)  Revenue 
Customer A $2,068   24%
Customer B  1,067   12%
Customer C  872   10%
Customer D  403   5%
Customer E  382   4%
Customer F  381   4%
All other customers  3,550   41%
Total $8,722   100%

Our business depends largely on defense spending and program budgets which expand and contract across fiscal year periods. Revenues from orders for our products and services often span several years with deliveries varying across both interim and annual fiscal year periods. Additionally, our EW test and training system is a relatively new product platform with many targeted customers with long sales cycles and high average solutions sales pricing. We therefore expect that buy thema major customer in one year may not be a major customer in the following year. Accordingly, our net revenue and typicallyearnings may vary significantly from one period to the next and will decline if we are shared amongunable to gain new customers or cannot increase our business with other existing customers to replace declining net revenue from the previous year’s major customers. 

Bookings*

The numbers under Bookings are pro forma for 2022 and assume the Company acquired Gresham on January 1, 2022.

New orders by reporting segment are as follows for the respective periods (In thousands): 

  Three Months Ended       
Segment March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022  $ Change  % Change 
Precision Electronic Solutions $2,632  $3,886  $(1,462)  (36)%
Power Electronics & Displays  1,815   3,409   (1,594)  (47)%
RF Solutions  832   1,940   (1,108)  (57)%
Total $5,279  $9,443  $(4,164)  (44)%

  Year Ended       
Segment December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021  $ Change  % Change 
Precision Electronic Solutions $18,580  $19,819  $(1,239)  (6)%
Power Electronics & Displays  12,507   10,286   2,221   22%
RF Solutions  6,673   11,066   (4,393)  (40)%
Total $37,760  $41,171  $(3,411)  (8)%

*Bookings represent new orders received in the period shown

New orders for the three months ended March 31, 2023 decreased by 44% to $5.3 million from $9.4 million. The Precision Electronics Solutions group decreased by 36% as majority of its business comes from a large numberdefense contractor with orders fluctuating from quarter to quarter. The three months ended March 31, 2023 bookings of users generally limiting accessthe Power Electronics & Displays group experienced a 47% decline in bookings to their testing capabilities. Giga-tronics can complement these larger test systems by uniquely addressing$1.8 million primarily due to a decrease in defense orders which fluctuate from quarter to quarter, and the new closed loop test requirementsRF solutions group experienced a decline in bookings in the three months ended March 31, 2023 of 57% to $832,000. The Company received a large order of $1.5 million from a prime contractor in the first quarter of 2022, which did not repeat in the first quarter of 2023.

New orders received for the next generation RADAR/EW devices andyear ended December 31, 2022 were $37.8 million as compared to $41.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Precision Electronic Solutions group’s order decreased by offering smaller, lower cost and more flexible testing solutions that can be delivered more quickly,6% primarily due to a reduction for orders of RF filters. The Power Electronics & Displays group increased orders by 22% in dollars but was negatively impacted by the strengthening of the dollar. The RF Solutions group experienced a 40% decrease in new orders primarily due to orders totaling $6.3 million received from one prime contractor in fiscal 2021, which greatly increases a user’s access to systems test capability and reduces the risk of program failure.did not repeat in fiscal 2022.

 

65
Table of Contents

Backlog** 

The numbers under Backlog are pro forma for 2022 and assume the Company acquired Gresham on January 1, 2022.

 Backlog includes only those customer orders for which a binding agreement exists, a delivery schedule has been agreed upon between us and our customer and, in the case of U.S. government orders, for which funding has been appropriated. Orders for our products include program orders from prime contractors with extended delivery dates. Accordingly, the backlog of orders may vary substantially from year-to-year and the backlog entering any single fiscal quarter may not be indicative of revenue for any period.

The following table shows order backlog and related information at the end of the respective periods (In thousands):

  Three Months Ended       
Segment March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022  $ Change  % Change 
Precision Electronic Solutions $9,746  $11,656  $(1,910)  (16)%
Power Electronics & Displays  7,916   7,646   270   4%
RF Solutions  9,166   10,015   (849)  (8)%
Total $26,828  $29,317  $(2,489)  (8)%

**Backlog represents orders to be fulfilled including bookings prior to the period ended March 31, 2023

Backlog as of March 31, 2023 decreased from $29.3 million to $26.8 million or by 8% compared to March 31, 2022 primarily due to decrease in bookings as shown above.

  Year Ended       
Segment December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021  $ Change  % Change 
Precision Electronic Solutions $11,682  $11,873  $(191)  (2)%
Power Electronics & Displays  8,890   6,558   2,332   36%
RF Solutions  10,125   9,581   544   6%
Total $30,697  $28,012  $2,685   10%

Backlog as of December 31, 2022 increased 10% compared to December 31, 2021 primarily due to the 22% increase in bookings by the Power Electronic & Displays group.

Proprietary Technology and Intellectual Property

 

Our competitive position is largely dependent upon our ability to provide performance specifications for our instrumentsdeliver systems and systemsproducts that (a) are easy to use and effectively and reliably meet customers’ needs and (b) selectively surpass competitors’ specifications in competing products. PatentsWhile patents may occasionally provide some short-term protection of proprietary designs. However, because ofdesigns, with the rapid progress of technological development in our industry, such protection is most often although not always, short-lived. Therefore, although we occasionally pursue patent coverage, we place major emphasis onemphasize the development of new products with superior performance specifications and the upgrading of existing products toward this same end.

 

Our trade names, trademarks, trade secrets, customer relationships, domain names, proprietary technologies and similar intellectual property are important to our success. We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, industry expertise, confidential procedures, and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property. We believe that because our products are continually updated and revised, obtaining patents would be costly and not beneficial. It is policy to enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with its employees and contractors as well as nondisclosure agreements with its suppliers and strategic partners in order to limit access to and disclosure of its proprietary information. 

66
Table of Contents

Microphase and Enertec typically design custom products to their customer specifications as “work for hire” and therefore own no intellectual property in the design. As the ultimate end user, the U.S. military and the Israeli MOD typically acquire and retain rights in all such technical data. Microphase does acquire and own intellectual property in the fabrication, assembly, tuning and testing protocols followed for its products. 

In the UK, Gresham Power typically will retain ownership of the intellectual property of the designs of products developed for defense applications. However, neither Relec nor Gresham Power typically retain intellectual property in any of the standard power products that they sell on the commercial market. 

Our Giga-tronics Division products are primarily based on our own designs, which are derived from our own engineering abilities. If our new product engineering efforts fall behind, our competitive position weakens. Conversely, effective product development greatly enhances our competitive status. While we utilize certain software licenses in certain functional aspects for some of our products, such licenses are generally readily available, non-exclusive and are obtained at either no cost or for a relatively small fee. 

Patent Portfolio

 

We have maintained four non-provisionalfive patents related to our legacy 2500B parametric signal generator product line, which was not among the legacy products that we have sold.with another pending. These patents describe advanced synthesis techniques and potentially can be extended for use with the Giga-tronicsCompany’s ASGA system and to a number of Microsource synthesizer components. Additionally, we filedIn February 2020, the Company was granted a provisional U.S. patent relating to theits ASGA system in June of 2016 and subsequently filed a non-provisional application in June of 2017.system. The patent application describes the internal design of the ASGAdvanced Signal Generator and ASAthe Advanced Signal Analyzer along with the architecture of how all the components work together to facilitate building multi-channel test systems with reduced size, weight and cost as compared to present solutions. A second patent was granted in November 2020 describing uses of the ASGA system in high channel-count situations. A third patent application which was filed in April 2020 describing how the ASGA achieves its low noise performance is in the final stage of being granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 

The applicationfollowing table summarizes our current issued patents (indicated by “Granted”) including the grant dates thereof, and patent applications (indicated by “Published”). In general, patent protection provides the patent holder with a monopoly on the invention within its scope for the non-provisional patentduration of the patent.

Patent/Application Number

TitleOwner

7,639,100 B2

RF Step AttenuatorGiga-tronics Incorporated

7,215,167 B1

Low Noise Microwave Frequency Synthesizer Having Fast SwitchingGiga-tronics Incorporated

7,514,970 B2

Decimal Frequency SynthesizerGiga-tronics Incorporated

7,208,990 B1

Low Noise Microwave Frequency Synthesizer Having Loop AccumulationGiga-tronics Incorporated

10,560,110 B1

Precision Microwave Frequency Synthesizer and Receiver with Delay Balanced Drift Cancelling LoopGiga-tronics Incorporated

10,848,163 B2

Precision Microwave Frequency Synthesizer and Receiver with Delay Balanced Drift Cancelling LoopGiga-tronics Incorporated

2020/0127672 A1

(Pending)

Precision Microwave Frequency Synthesizer and Receiver with Delay Balanced Drift Cancelling LoopGiga-tronics Incorporated

67
Table of Contents

Operating Capital 

We generally strive to maintain adequate levels of inventory and we generally sell to customers on 30-day payment terms in the U.S while allowing more time for our international customers. Typically, we receive payment terms of 30 days from our suppliers. We believe that these practices are consistent with typical industry practices. Beyond financing our primary sources of liquidity come from customer sales, which are dependent on our receipt and shipment of customer orders. 

Gresham’s liquidity was historically supported by AAI’s injection of cash consisting of contributions to capital and loans. AAI has not agreed to support us financially in the future, although it has recently provided us with an additional $165,000. There was no written documentation in connection with this advance. As a result, we need to seek additional capital to fund our operations, although we may not be successful in our efforts to do so. See, “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Financial Condition. Because AAI is ending its support, we will need additional capital to fund our operations, and our inability to generate or obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.” We also are negotiating an Equity Line Agreement. If we execute the Equity Line Agreement, we will be required to register the underlying common stock to receive any funding. Further unless our common stock begins to trade actively, we will not receive any material funding from the Equity Line Agreement. In any event, we must refinance or obtain new financing our existing convertible notes we issued in January 2023 which are due October 6, 2023.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -Liquidity and Capital Resources - Our Recent Financings” for our discussion of our recent financing activities. Under our financing agreements, we can enter into a factoring agreement of $2 million using our accounts receivable as collateral.

Sales and Marketing 

We market our products directly to our customers and rely internal sales forces within each of our operating subsidiaries primarily to identify leads and complete sales. We also engage independent sales representatives who are perceived to have expertise with targeted markets and/or customers. Our marketing and sales efforts target specific types of customers such as major defense contractors, manufacturers of industrial products, health care solutions and infrastructure components in transportation and telecommunications. 

Corporate Chief Development Officer

In connection with the Business Combination, we are relying on an experienced sales and business development executive as our Chief Development Officer whose principal role is to drive organic growth and identify prospects for further growth through mergers and/or acquisitions. We will implement Gresham’s Hub Spot to capture and track the opportunity stream within and among the operating subsidiaries. 

Precision Electronic Solutions

Much of business development and sales effort at Enertec has historically taken place at the senior executive level. Zvika Avni, Chief Executive Officer at Enertec currently pending beforeholds and maintains the key customer relationships which generate most of the revenue at Enertec. On the other hand, our Giga-tronics Division has invested in a salesforce for both the TEmS products as well as the Microsource products. Going forward, we are hopeful that our Precision Electronic Solutions will benefit from Zvika Avni’s continuing effort to develop business for turnkey precision electronic solutions along with expanded efforts of the Chief Development Officer leading our sales team although no assurances can be given. 

RF Solutions

In recent years, much of the business development effort at Microphase comes through engineer to engineer collaboration and at the senior executive levels with Timothy Long, our Chief Operating Officer, holding and maintaining most customer relationships. For the foreseeable future, operations will continue to drive business as Microphase works down a healthy backlog. 

68
Table of Contents

Power Electronics and Displays

The Power Electronics and Displays group has a high performing team of six sales professionals supported by a sales administrator and two inside sales professionals to continue drive new business and growth in the UK and European markets. If we can solve our liquidity issues, we plan to add more business development resources in 2023 focused specifically on defense customers for Power Electronics and Displays while the group also expands use of strategic operating partners in the Middle East, India and Australia in 2023. These representatives will promote our products and serve as the customer interface for Power Electronics and Displays in specific parts of the world as agreed. Typically, either we or the manufacturing representatives are entitled to terminate the manufacturer representative agreement upon 30 days’ written notice. 

Relec and Gresham Power advertise in highly targeted industry-specific publications such as Electronics Weekly, New Electronics, Electronic Product Design & Test, Electronics Specifier, Components in Electronics, Design Products & Applications, Rail Technology Magazine, Rail Engineer, Rail Professional. In addition, Relec also posts regular podcasts on topics of interest to customers and prospect as well as running an active public relations campaign to get placements of earned media and coverage in a wide range of media. We look to replicate similar campaigns in other operating subsidiaries to generate inquiries/leads, raise awareness of us and support talent recruiting efforts. 

Other Marketing Activities

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, we also promoted our products and solutions by attending trade shows such as the Association of Old Crows Conferences, Defense Manufacturing Conference, Land Forces Conference (Australia), Doha International Maritime Defense Exhibition & Conference (DIMDEX) Electronica (Europe), Southern Manufacturing and Electronics, and Railtex. Since the world has adapted to “living with COVID”, we have resumed attending trade shows to make new contacts, identify leads, assess competitive offerings and build awareness of the full range of our solution offerings.

Each of our operating businesses maintain a comprehensive website emphasizing its respective capabilities and expertise. We plan to upgrade all our websites to standardize corporate identification while adding more features and functionality to drive inquiries, generate leads from prospective customers and support recruiting efforts. 

Government Regulation 

We must meet applicable regulatory, environmental, emissions, safety, quality and other requirements where specified by the customer and accepted by it or as required by local regulatory or legal requirements. The products that we market and sell in Europe may be subject to the 2003 European Directive on Restriction of Hazardous Substances (“RoHS”), which restricts the use of six hazardous materials in the manufacture of certain electronic and electrical equipment, as well as the 2002 European Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE”), which determines collection, recycling and recovery goals for electrical goods. In July 2006, our industry began phasing in RoHS and WEEE requirements in most geographical markets with specific emphasis on consumer-based products. We believe that RoHS and WEEE-compliant components may be subject to longer lead-times and higher prices as the industry transitions to these new requirements. REACH Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals Registration, is a European Union regulation dating from December 18, 2006. REACH addresses the production and use of chemical substances, and their potential impacts on both human health and the environment. 

In addition to these requirements for our dealings with customers in the EU, similar regulatory mandates from the United States, the UK and Israel apply to all our operating subsidiaries. We have structured operations to comply with these requirements and have experienced little to no impact on lead times or prices. Given the applicability of these requirements to all competitors alike, we believe that compliance has had no impact on the competitive position of any operating subsidiary. 

Some of our products are subject to the ITAR, which is administered by the U.S. patent office.Department of State. ITAR controls not only the export of certain products specifically designed, modified, configured or adapted for military systems, but also the export of related technical data and defense services and foreign production. We obtain required export licenses for any exports subject to ITAR. Compliance with ITAR may require a prolonged period of time; if the process of obtaining required export licenses for products subject to ITAR is delayed, it could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results. Any future restrictions or charges may be imposed by the United States or any other foreign country. In addition, from time-to-time, we enter into defense contracts to supply technology and products to foreign countries for programs that are funded and governed by the U.S. Foreign Military Financing program. 

69
Table of Contents

 

We are not dependent on trademarks, licenses or franchises. We utilize certain software licenses in certain functional aspects for somealso subject to heightened government scrutiny of our products. Such licensesoperations pursuant to certain of our contracts.

Security Clearances 

As a U.S. Government contractor, we are readilyrequired to maintain facility and personnel security clearances complying with the U.S. DOD and other Federal agency requirements. All Gresham Worldwide operating companies in the United States maintain strict protocols for handling classified information and Confidential Unclassified Information associated with its work for the U.S. DOD. We have built within both our production facilities in Shelton, CT and Dublin, CA “Restricted Areas” certified for generating, storing and reviewing classified information. Our U.S. subsidiaries and Division also must obtain and maintain “authority to operate” equipment to perform classified work. The process to secure these authorities is long and laborious. After the Business Combination, our U.S. subsidiaries now have an experienced information security team to oversee applications to secure these authorities as well as ongoing monitoring to maintain the security of these systems. 

Gresham Power works on many contracts classified as “Official Sensitive” that require individual security clearances and adherence to information security protocols for receiving, handling and storing confidential information as required in the UK Official Secrets Act and its implementing regulations. Relec does not work on classified, sensitive defense work.

Enertec complies with all information security requirements included in its customer contracts as well as all the confidentiality laws that the State of Israel mandates for work related to defense of the country. 

Audits and Investigations 

As a government contractor, we are subject to audits and investigations by U.S. Government agencies including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (the “DCAA”), the Defense Contract Management Agency (the “DCMA”), the Inspector General of the U.S. DOD and other departments and agencies, the Government Accountability Office, the Department of Justice and Congressional Committees. From time-to-time, these and other agencies investigate or conduct audits to determine whether a contractor’s operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable requirements. The DCAA and DCMA also review the adequacy of, and compliance with, a contractor’s internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s accounting, purchasing, property, estimating, earned value management and material management accounting systems. Our final allowable incurred costs for each year are also subject to audit and have from time to time resulted in disputes between us and the U.S. Government. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed or must be refunded if already reimbursed. If an audit or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, which may include termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or prohibition from doing business with the U.S. Government. 

The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation, as implemented in standard contract clauses, mandates that our U.S. business establish and follow extensive detailed processes and protocols to protect classified and Confidential Unclassified Information (“CUI”) from disclosure and unauthorized access. That mandate includes a requirement that Microphase formulate and implement a System Security Plan with 110 different elements and protocols for handling and protecting classified information and CUI. Over the next two years the U.S. DOD will require all participants in the defense supply chain to demonstrate compliance with the Capability Model Maturity Cybersecurity as verified through an independent third-party auditor. Compliance with these mandates requires and will require Gresham’s U.S. subsidiaries to invest significant resources to maintain compliance. For instance, compliance requires extensive security controls on access to IT systems, strong firewalls and intrusion monitoring. We have in place an experienced team to ensure information security for all subsidiaries in the U.S. as well as oversee security of all employees and facilities in U.S. operations. These investments add to indirect cost pools that our U.S. operations must recover in the price of its products for U.S. DOD and contractors. 

Enertec conducts operations under constant supervision of the Ministry of Defense of Israel. All its contracts are subject to audits of performance, quality and price reasonableness. Enertec has implemented the strongest possible cybersecurity protections consistent with the resources available non-exclusiveto a company its size. 

Gresham Power contracts with UK Ministry of Defense, Royal Navy or major contractors serving those agencies include standard provisions which give the customer the right to audit its performance under those contracts when they see fit. Audits are part of doing business with the government and are obtained at either no cost ortypically focus on deliveries - on time project milestones as well as quality. The Royal Navy will review Gresham Power pricing of services provided under support contract every 12 months for reasonableness. 

70
Table of Contents

Gresham Power is fully certified as “Cyber Essentials Plus Compliant.” Cyber Essentials Plus is a relatively small fee.government backed, industry-supported scheme to help organizations protect themselves against common online threats. The UK Government requires all suppliers bidding for contracts involving the handling of sensitive and personal information to be certified against the Cyber Essentials program criteria. 

Other Compliance Issues 

 

In September 2015,addition, we entered into a software development agreement with a major aerospaceare subject to the local, state and defense company wherebynational laws and regulations of the aerospace company developedjurisdictions where we operate that affect companies generally, including laws and licensedregulations governing commerce, intellectual property, trade, health and safety, contracts, privacy and communications, consumer protection, web services, tax, and corporate laws and securities laws. These regulations and laws may change over time. Unfavorable changes in existing and new laws and regulations could increase our cost of doing business and impede its simulation software to us. The simulation software (also called Open Loop Simulator or OLS technology), which is owned by the aerospace company and licensed to us, allows our ASGA system to coordinate with various third-party hardware elements to generate the signals for testing RADAR/EW equipment. We license the OLS software as a bundled or integrated solution with our TEmS product.growth. 

 

Employees

 

As of June 30, 2018,July 20, 2023, we had a total of 196 employees located in the United States, the United Kingdom and June 30, 2017, weIsrael. All but eight of these employees are employed 43 and 52 individuals on a full-time basis, respectively.basis. After completing the Business Combination, the Company conducted a reduction in the workforce in January 2023 to eliminate redundancies and achieve cost savings in the U.S. operations. With additional attrition, the U.S. operations cut 14 positions to reduce payroll costs by $1.4 million on annualized basis. Additional cuts to be implemented on Monday. The reduction in force did not extend to any of the overseas operations. We believe that our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. Competition for skilled personnel in our markets is competitive. While our size and capital resources constrain our ability to attract and retain employees with cash compensation, we attempt to compensate for this constraint by offering equity awards and opportunities for training and internal promotion. None of our employees areis currently represented by a labor union, and wetrade union. We consider our employee relations with our employees to be good.


Legal Proceedings From time-to-time, we may hire additional workers on an independent contractor basis as the need arises. Presently, due to its backlog and expected orders, Microphase needs to add employees in addition to its planned use of Microsource employees.

 

From time to time, weMANAGEMENT

Our Executive Officers

Executive officers are involved in various disputeselected by and litigation matters that ariseserve at the discretion of the Board, with each executive officer serving at the discretion of our Board and holding office until his or her successor is duly appointed and qualified, or until his earlier resignation or removal. The names of our executive officers, their positions with us and their ages are set forth in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2018, we had no material pending legal proceedings.table below, followed by certain other information about them:

 

NameAgePosition
Jonathan Read (1)66Chief Executive Officer and Director
Timothy Long (2)66Chief Operating Officer
Lutz Henckels82Chief Financial Officer

MANAGEMENT

(1)Mr. Read became our Chief Executive Officer and a director upon the consummation of the Business Combination on September 8, 2022.
(2)Mr. Long became our Chief Operating Officer upon the consummation of the Business Combination on September 8, 2022.

 

Set forth below is certain information regardinga brief biographical description of each of our executive officers, including their business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years.

Jonathan Read became our Chief Executive Officer and directors. Eachwas appointed a director effective on September 8, 2022 with the closing of the directors listed belowBusiness Combination. Mr. Read has been Gresham’s Chief Executive Officer since May 2019. He was elected to our boarda director of directors to serve until our next annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor is elected and qualified. All directors hold office for one-year terms until the election and qualification of their successors. The following table sets forth information regarding the members of our board of directors and our executive officers:

Name

Age

Position

Gordon L. Almquist

68

Director

Lutz P. Henckels

77

Director, Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer

John R. Regazzi

63

Chief Executive Officer and Director

William J. Thompson

53

Director, Chairman of the Board

Armand Pantalone

53

Chief Technology Officer

Timothy Unsprang 

57

Vice President Sales and Marketing 

Jamie Weston

53

Director

Gordon L. Almquisthas served as a member of our board of directors since 2012. Mr. Almquist has more than 30 years of experience in senior financial management roles at public and private technology companies. From August 2009 until his retirement in June 2016, Mr. Almquist served as the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Keyssa,Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (formerly, formerly known as WaveConnex,Timefire VR, Inc.), a semiconductor technology company headquartered in Campbell, CA. Prior to Keyssa,from August 18, 2017 until he held similar positions at Strix Systems, where heresigned on November 3, 2022 and was also a co-founder, and at publicly-traded companies including Vertel Corporation and 3D Systems Corporation. Mr. Almquist also served on the board of directors for CAP Wireless (acquired by TriQuint Semiconductor in 2013). Mr. Almquist is a certified public accountant (inactive) in the State of California and holds a bachelor's degree in business administration (accounting) from California State University, Northridge. 

Lutz P. Henckelshas served as a member of our Board since 2011. Dr. Henckels is a managing member of Alara Capital AVI II, an investment fund. He was appointed the Executive Vice President and interim Chief Financial Officer of Giga-tronics in February 2018. Prior to joining Giga-tronics as an officer, Dr. Henckels was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HiQ Solar which produces solar invertersTimefire VR, Inc. from October 2017 through May 2019 and from November 2015 to January 2017. From July 14, 2017 through July 20, 2018, Mr. Read served as a director of BTCS, Inc., a digital asset-related company. From 2005 through 2012, Mr. Read was the Chief Executive Officer of ECOtality Inc. (“ECOtality”), a San Francisco based company that Mr. Read founded and was formed to create a network of charging stations for electric cars. In 2013, ECOtality filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In 2014, Mr. Read filed for bankruptcy. We believe that Mr. Read’s management and public company experience, his experience in the commercial market from May 2013 to December 2017. Dr. Henckels has over 40 years’ experience servingdefense industry and his role as Chief Executive Officer of the privateCompany, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.

71
Table of Contents

Timothy Long has served as our Chief Operating Officer since September 8, 2022. He also has served as the Chief Operating Officer of Gresham since December 2019 and was its Executive Vice President for Strategic Development, from April 2019 until December 2019. He also has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Microphase, a subsidiary of Gresham. Before joining Gresham, Mr. Long worked as a consultant to businesses, municipalities, and institutions of higher learning on government contracting, clean energy sustainability and government affairs for 15 years. From November 2017 to March 2019, Mr. Long worked as a consultant to Power Grow, Inc. (“Power Grow”), Spark Fund and Secure Systems through his sole proprietorship, Long View Consulting. 

Lutz Henckels has served as our Chief Financial Officer since March 2019. He was a member of our Board from 2011 through September 8, 2022. He was appointed our Interim Chief Financial Officer in February 2018. He was appointed as our Executive Vice President in March 2019. He was appointed to the additional position of Chief Operating Officer in July 2020. Effective September 8, 2022, Dr. Henckels resigned all of his positions except Chief Financial Officer. Dr. Henckels has more than 40 years’ experience in corporate leadership roles, and previously served as Chief Executive Officer of public and private technology companies, including HiQ Solar, SyntheSys Research (acquired by Tektronix/Danaher), LeCroy Corporation and HHB Systems. Dr. HenckelsHe was the founder of HBB Systems, an electronic design automation company, and took that company public with its listing on Nasdaq. As CEO of LeCroy, he focused the company on its oscilloscope business, drove a successful turnaround and guided that company though its public listing on Nasdaq.

Our Directors

The Board consists of seven directors, with each director serving a term lasting until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. The names of our directors, their positions with the recipientCompany and their ages are set forth in the table below, followed by certain other information about them:

NameAgePosition
Jonathan Read (1)66Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jeffrey Bentz (2)63Chairman of the Board of Directors
William B. Horne (3)54Director
Robert Smith (4)78Director
John R. Regazzi68Director
William J. Thompson57Director
Thomas E. Vickers58Director

(1)Mr. Read became our Chief Executive Officer and a director upon the consummation of the Business Combination on September 8, 2022.
(2)Mr. Bentz became a director upon the consummation of the Business Combination on September 8, 2022.
(3)Mr. Horne became a director upon the consummation of the Business Combination on September 8, 2022.
(4)Mr. Smith became a director upon the consummation of the Business Combination on September 8, 2022.

Set forth below is a brief biographical description of each of our directors who are not previously described above, including their business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the first John Fluke Sr. Memorial Award, along with David Packard, Joe Keithley, and Alex D’Arbeloff. The John Fluke Sr. Memorial Award was established in 1986 to honor executives who have led their companies with innovative engineering or business management. Dr. Henckels holds a Bachelorlast five years.

Jeffrey Bentz is our Chairman of Science and Master of Science in Electrical Engineering and PhD in Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.our Board since September 8, 2022. He graduated Eta Kappa Nu and Tau Beta Pi, and is also a graduate of the OMP program of Harvard Business School. Dr. Henckels has been a director of AAI since 2018. Mr. Bentz has been a director of AAI Disruptive Technologies Corp. [NYSE:ADRT] since December 2021. Mr. Bentz is an experienced businessman who has served since 1994 as President of North Star Terminal & Stevedore Company, a full-service stevedoring company located in Alaska and whose major areas of business include terminal operations and management, stevedore services, and heavy equipment operations. He also has served as a director and advisor to several private companies and agencies. We believe that Mr. Bentz’s public company director experience, executive-level experience, including his operational and financial oversight of companies with multiple publicly traded companies, including Ikos, Inframetrics,profit centers and LeCroy.his extensive experience in the real estate and commercial services industries give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.

 

72

Table of Contents

Armand Pantalone was promoted to the position of Chief Technology Officer on June 11, 2018. Mr. Pantalone joined Giga-tronics in July 2016 as the Director of RADAR/EW Test Solutions. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Pantalone worked at Raytheon’s Integrated Defense Systems Division from July 1996 to June 2016. In his 20 years at Raytheon, he held a variety of technical and leadership positions associated with RADAR and missile defense programs. Previous experience includes 10 years at Northrop Grumman/Nordeen Systems as an RF & Microwave engineer specializing in the design of RADAR systems including system integration and flight testing. Mr. Pantalone graduated from Clarkson University in Potsdam, NY with a dual degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering.

 

William Horne has served as our director since September 8, 2022. He has been the Chief Executive Officer of AAI since January 2021 and a director since October 2016. He served as AAI’s President from August 2020 until January 2021 and previously as its Chief Financial Officer since January 2018. He has been a director of Gresham since 2019. Mr. Horne served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of AAI Disruptive Technologies Corporation (NYSE:ARDT) since January 2021. He served as the Chief Financial Officer of Targeted Medical Pharma, Inc. (OTCBB: TRGM) from August 2013 to May 2019. Mr. Horne is a director and Chief Financial Officer of Avalanche International, Corp. Mr. Horne has served on the board of directors of Alzamend Neuro, Inc., a biotechnology firm dedicated to finding the treatment, prevention and cure for Alzheimer’s Disease, since 2016. We believe that Mr. Horne's extensive financial and accounting experience in diversified industries and with companies involving complex transactions give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.

Robert Smith has served as our director since September 8, 2022. Mr. Smith has been a director of AAI Disruptive Technologies Corp. [NYSE:ADRT] since December 2021. He serves as the lead independent director of AAI and has been a director since September 2016. Previously, he was a director of AAI from November 2010 until May 2015. He is currently a C-level executive consultant working with Bay Area high-tech firms on various strategic initiatives in all aspects of their business. We believe that Mr. Smith’s executive-level experience, and his service on AAI’s Board, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.

John R. Regazzihas served as a member of our Board since 2006. He has beenwas our Chief Executive Officer since February 2018.from April 2006 until he resigned with the closing of the Business Combination. Mr. Regazzi retired as a full-time employee effective January 31, 2023 and is now a part-time employee. Previously he was appointed Co-Chief Executive Officer beginning in June 2017 and Chief Technology Officer beginning in August 2016. From 2006 to August 2016, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Prior toWe believe that Mr. Regazzi heldRegazzi’s executive-level experience, including his previous service as our Chief Executive Officer, and his service on our Board, give him the following positions within the Giga-tronics Instrument Division: Presidentqualifications and General Manager, Vice Presidentskills to serve as one of Operations, and Vice President of Engineering. Mr. Regazzi also serves as the Company’s Secretary. Prior to Giga-tronics Mr. Regazzi was with Hewlett Packard and Keysight for 22 years in various design and management positions associated with their microwave sweeper and synthesizer product lines. Mr. Regazzi holds a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Rutgers University and a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from Lehigh University.our directors.

William J.William Thompson has served as Chairman of our board of directors sinceBoard from August 2016 and has been a member of our Board since 2011.2011 and until the closing of the Business Combination as a director since then. Dr. Thompson served as our Acting Chief Executive Officer from August 2016 until June 2017. Dr. Thompson serves as Chief Technology Officer of Safetonet Limited, a privately held cyber-safety business focused on protecting children from online harms that makes Net Nanny™ parental control software, and he is a Managing Member of Alara Capital AVI II and was Director of Research for Jacobi Capital Management.  Dr. Thompson co-founded Circadiant Systems (acquired by JDS Uniphase Corporation),partner at QFT Analytics, a venture capital backed testprivate company that designedoffers financial modeling and manufactured instrumentationback-office solutions for optical communication. Dr. Thompson also servedsmall companies. We believe that Mr. Thompson’s executive-level experience, including his previous service as a Member of Technical Staff at Lucent Technologies where he designed analog RF optoelectronic components for high speed optical communication,our Acting Chief Executive Officer, and his service on our Board and as a researcher with the University of Maryland. Dr. Thompson graduated summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Science in Physics from University of North Carolina at Charlotte and holds a Ph.D. in Physics from Stony Brook University. He graduated as a Palmer Scholar with an MBA in Finance from the Wharton Schoolour Chairman of the UniversityBoard give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of Pennsylvania.our directors.

 

Timothy Ursprung was appointed to the position of Vice President Sales and Marketing in July, 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ursprung worked at Rodelco Electronics Corporation as the head of sales in the RF/Microwave Integrated Microwave Assembly marketspace promoting Highly Complex solutions for Electronic Warfare and Radar applications from April 2014 to June 2018. Prior to Rodelco, from July 2005 to January 2014, Mr. Ursprung owned and operated a manufacturer’s representative firm, EOX Sales LLC, covering the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions of the United States. In addition, Mr. Ursprung was Vice President Sales and Marketing for Aeroflex Test Solutions for ten years in charge of all activities in the Americas from July 1995 to June 2005. Mr. Ursprung graduated from Clarkson University in Potsdam, NY with a degree in Engineering and Management.

Jamie WestonThomas Vickershas served as a member of our Board since 2016.September 2020. Since January 2020, Mr. WestonVickers has served as the President of Stack Financial Inc., a finance and accounting advisory firm that provides family office, Chief Financial Officer on demand, finance and accounting services to various clients. He has been a director of Veritas Farms, Inc., since October 1, 2020. From October 2012 to 2019, he served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Human Resources for OmniComm Systems Inc., a healthcare technology company, where he was a key member of the executive team that successfully completed that company’s acquisition by Anju Software. At OmniComm he had primary responsibility for planning, implementing, managing and controlling all financial activities and worked directly with the Chief Executive Officer to determine budget, disbursements and expenditures of money and capital assets. He is a Managing Director at Spring Mountain Capital,Chartered Financial Analyst®. We believe that Mr. Vicker's extensive corporate finance and operations experience in diversified industries, and with companies involving complex transactions and his role as a private equity firm,chartered financial analyst give him the qualifications and has been with the firm since 2011. Spring Mountain Capital is the largest investor in Alara Capital AVI II, the Company’s largest shareholder. Mr. Weston was previously a Partner at The Wicks Groupskills to serve as one of Companies, a private equity firm with close to $1 billion under management, focused on selected segments of the information, education, and media industries. During his 15 years at Wicks, he was an integral part of its investment and management activities, and served on the board of directors of many of its portfolio companies. While at Wicks, he directly structured and negotiated acquisitions and divestitures and other transactions. Prior to Wicks, Mr. Weston worked at IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company and National Westminster Bancorp, where he completed leveraged financings. Mr. Weston received his M.B.A. from Fordham University and graduated cum laude from Drew University with a B.A. in Economics.our directors.

 

Director or Officer Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our directors and executive officers were not involved in any legal proceedings described in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K in the past ten years.


Directors and Officers Liability Insurance

We have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance insuring our directors and officers against liability for acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers, subject to certain exclusions. Such insurance also insures us against losses, which we may incur in indemnifying our officers and directors. We have also entered into agreements with our executive officers and directors. In addition, officers and directors also have indemnification rights under applicable laws, and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

OurThe Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Corporate Governance and Nominating and Governance Committee. Committee (the “Nominating Committee”). 

Each committeeof the committees has a charter each of which postedthat is available on the investor relations section of ourthe Company’s website www.Giga-tronics.com, under the heading “Governance – Governance Documents.”at https://investor.gigatronics.com/governance-documents.

73
Table of Contents

 

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee consists of directors Gordon L. AlmquistThomas E. Vickers (Chairman), William J. Thompson,Jeffrey Bentz and Jamie Weston. While Mr. Almquist and Mr. Weston, are considered to be independent under the director independence standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market applicable to audit committee members, Dr. Thompson is not considered to be independent under this standard because he was the Company’s co-Chief Executive Officer from August 2016 to June 2017.Robert Smith. The Audit Committee serves to monitor the effectiveness of the independent audit, as well as the Company'sCompany’s accounting, financial controls and financial reports. The Audit Committee must pre-approve all non-audit services provided by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. independent public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee held four meetings during the past fiscal year. For fiscal 2018, the Board has determined that Gordon L. Almquist, as the financial expert, had:Mr. Vickers has: 

 

(i) an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements;

(i)an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements.

 

(ii) the ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves;

(ii)the ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves;

 

(iii) experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the registrant's financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities;

(iii)experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the registrant’s financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities;

 

(iv) an understanding of internal control over financial reporting; and

(iv)an understanding of internal control over financial reporting; and

 

(v) an understanding of audit committee functions.

(v)an understanding of audit committee functions.

 

Therefore, the Board determined that Mr. Almquist isVickers qualifies as the Audit Committee’s financial expert for purposes of the Nasdaq Stock Market rules and requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee consists of directors Jamie WestonJeffrey Bentz (Chairman), Gordon L. AlmquistWilliam J. Thompson and William J. Thompson. Mr. Weston and Mr. Almquist are independent under the independence standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market but Dr. Thompson is not because he served as the Company’s Acting Chief Executive Officer during 2016 and 2017.B. Horne. The Compensation Committee formulates recommendations to the Board regarding levels of compensation for management. In addition, in order to recognize the expected future contributions of key employees and provide an additional incentive for them to remain with Giga-tronicsthe Company over the long-term, the Compensation Committee awards options to purchase shares of our common stock and other forms of equity awards. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all stock options, other equity awards and executive compensation.

 

The Compensation Committee did not engage any compensation consultants in determining or recommending executive officer compensation for fiscal 2018.


Nominating and Governance Committee

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) consists of directors Jamie Weston (Chairman), William J. Thompson (Chairman), John R. Regazzi and Lutz P. Henckels. While Mr. Weston is considered to be independent under the director independence standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Dr. Henckels is not considered to be independent under this standard because he became the Company’s Acting Chief Financial Officer in February 2018 and Dr. Thompson is not considered to be independent because he served as our co-Chief Executive Officer during 2017.Thomas E. Vickers. The purpose of the Nominating Committee is to recommend persons for membership on the Board, to establish criteria and procedures for the selection of new directors, and to evaluate and recommend to our Board any revisions to our corporate governance guidelines. The Nominating Committee made no recommendations with respect to nominees for the 2018 Annual Meeting and instead, the nominees, each of whom is currently a director, were selected by our Board.

 

The Nominating Committee has no formal process for identifying and evaluating candidates. Existing directors identify suitable candidates as the need arises. The Board’s policy is to consider any director candidate nominated or recommended by a shareholder in the same manner that it would consider a candidate nominated by the Board or Nominating Committee. In the past year, the Company did not receive any recommendations for director candidates from any shareholders. Shareholder recommendations should be submitted in writing to the Company by mail at its main office at least 120 days in advance of the anniversary date of the mailing of notice of the previous year’s annual meeting and should include sufficient biographical information (including all information that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement for a shareholder meeting at which directors are to be elected) for the committee to make an initial evaluation of the candidate’s qualifications. The Company has never engaged or paid a fee to a third party search firm in connection with the nomination of a candidate for director.

 

The Nominating Committee considers the following criteria in proposing nominations for director to the full Board: independence; high personal and professional ethics and integrity; ability to devote sufficient time to fulfilling duties as a director; impact on diversity of the Board, including skills and other factors relevant to the Company’s business; overall experience in business, education, and other factors relevant to the Company’s business. At a minimum, the Nominating Committee must be satisfied that each nominee, both those recommended by the Nominating Committee and any recommended by shareholders, meets the following minimum qualifications:

The nominee should have a reputation for integrity and honesty.

The nominee should have demonstrated business experience and the ability to exercise sound judgment.

The nominee should have an understanding of the Company and its industry.

The nominee should have the ability and willingness to act in the interests of the Company and its shareholders.

The nominee should not have a conflict of interest that would impair the nominee’s ability to fulfill the responsibilities of a director.

The Nominating Committee has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all directors, officers and employees. The Company will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of such Code of Ethics upon written request mailed to the Company at its main office, to the attention of the Corporate Secretary. The Nominating Committee has no formal policy on the consideration to be given to diversity in the nomination process, other than to seek candidates who have skills and experience that are appropriate to the position and complementary to those of the other board members or candidates.

 

74
Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

No current or former executive officer or other employeeDirector Independence

Messrs. William J. Thompson and Thomas E. Vickers are considered to be independent, and the remaining directors are considered not to be independent, for purposes of Giga-tronics serves asmembership on the Board and their respective Committees under the Listing Rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a memberCode of Ethics applicable to all directors, officers and employees. The code of ethics is posted on our website under the Governance portion of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Giga-tronics Board or Compensation Committee.Investor Relations section at https://investor.gigatronics.com/governance-documents.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

The positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are currently held by different persons. The Board believes that having a separate chairman helps enable the Board to maintain an independent perspective on the activities of the Company and executive management. Periodically, the Board assesses the roles and the Board leadership structure to ensure the interests of the Company and the shareholders are best served.


 

Board Risk Oversight

 

The Company’s senior management manages the risks facing the Company under the oversight and supervision of the Board. While the full Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight at the Company, the Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk in the areas of financial reporting and internal controls. Other general business risks such as economic and regulatory risks are monitored by the full Board.

 

Director Independence

Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Almquist and Weston, are independent under the independence standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Mr. Regazzi and Dr. Henckels are not independent under this standard because of their employment with the Company. Dr. Thompson is not independent under this standard because he served as co-CEO of the Company in 2017. There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONInsider Trading Policy

 

The table below setsCompany has implemented an Insider Trading Policy applicable to its officers and directors and employees with access to material nonpublic information, as well as such persons’ family members, which generally prohibits such persons from conducting transactions involving the purchase or sale of the Company’s securities during a blackout period. For this purpose, the term “blackout period” is defined in the Policy as a quarterly period beginning on the 10th calendar day of the third month of each of the first three fiscal quarters, and the first calendar day of the third month of the fourth fiscal quarter, an in each case ending at the close of business on the second trading day following the date of public disclosure of the financial results for such fiscal quarter or year. In addition, under the Policy the Company may impose “special” blackout periods, including when there are nonpublic developments that would be considered material for insider trading law purposes. The Policy also strictly prohibits and trading on material nonpublic information, regardless of whether such a transaction occurs during a blackout period. 

While the granting of options and other equity awards to officers, directors and other employees is not expressly addressed in the Insider Trading Policy described above, the Company follows the same principles set forth in such Policy when granting equity awards, including options, to its officers, directors and other employees with access to material nonpublic information. Generally, the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee does not approve grants of such awards during a blackout period and does not take material nonpublic information into account when determining the timing and terms of such an award. Further, the Company does not have a policy or practice of timing the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the last two fiscal years,purpose of affecting the compensation earned by (i) each individual who served as our principalvalue of executive officer or principal financial officer,compensation. 

Policy Against Hedging Transactions

Under the Company’s Insider Trading Policy, all officers, directors and (ii) our most highly compensated executive officers, other than those listedcertain identified employees are prohibited from engaging in clause (i) above, who were serving as executive officers at the end of the last fiscal year (together, the “Named Executive Officers”). No other executive officer had annual compensation in excess of $100,000 during the last fiscal year. hedging transactions.

75
Table of Contents

 

Compensation of Officers

 

The following table provides information concerning compensation paid to, earned by or accrued with respect to (i) the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, (ii) and the two other most highly compensated executive officers during the last fiscal year who were serving as of December 31, 2022 and whose total compensation exceeded $100,000, and (iii) up to two additional individuals who would qualify under (ii) above but for the indicated fiscal years concerning compensationfact that such individuals were not serving as executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 2022. We refer to these persons as the “Named Executive Officers.” The determination of Named Executive Officers and the amounts reflected in the table give effect to the Business Combination which closed on September 8, 2022, and for this purpose reflect amounts paid, accrued or earned by or with respect to Gresham and its subsidiaries as if the Business Combination had occurred as of January 1, 2021, in accordance with SEC rules. 

Name and Position Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock Awards
($)
  Options
($)
  All Other
($)
  Total
($)
 
(a) (b) (c)  (d) (4)  (e) (5)  (f) (6)  (g) (7)    
Jonathan Read 2022  256,000   50,000         14,980   320,980 
Chief Executive Officer (1) 2021  256,000   52,500   231,800   635,185   16,896   1,192,381 
                           
Timothy Long 2022  236,000   50,000         34,105   320,105 
Chief Operating Officer (2) 2021  177,250   52,500   154,533   423,456   30,576   838,315 
                           
John R. Regazzi (3) 2022  176,400   100,000            276,400 
Former Chief Executive Officer, Director (3) 2021  260,000               260,000 
                           
Lutz P. Henckels 2022  187,938               187,938 
Chief Financial Officer 2021  280,000               280,000 

(1) Mr. Read was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer effective September 8, 2022 in connection with the Business Combination. Also includes amounts paid, accrued or earned by or with respect to Gresham and its subsidiaries prior to the closing of the Business Combination from January 1, 2021 to September 8, 2022, in accordance with SEC rules.

(2) Mr. Long was appointed as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer effective September 8, 2022 in connection with the Business Combination. Also includes amounts paid, accrued or earned by or with respect to Gresham and its subsidiaries prior to the closing of the Business Combination from January 1, 2021 to September 8, 2022, in accordance with SEC rules.

(3) Mr. Regazzi served as our Chief Executive Officer from April 2006 until January 31, 2023, when he entered into a Termination and Release Agreement with the Company pursuant to which he resigned as a full-time employee and officer of the Company and its subsidiaries. Mr. Regazzi remains a director of the Company.

(4) For each person serving as Giga-tronics’ chief executive officerof Messrs. Read and Long, represents cash bonuses paid by Gresham prior to the Business Combination. For Mr. Regazzi, represents a retention bonus earned in 2022 for remaining with the Company through the closing of the Business Combination. 

(5) Represents the fair market value of restricted stock units originally granted by Gresham and assumed in the Business Combination.

(6) Represents the fair market value of stock options which were originally granted by Gresham during the most recent fiscal year, which ended March 31, 2018,periods covered and each other executive officer who earned more than $100,000 during such fiscal year.were subsequently assumed by Giga in the Business Combination, calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 718 and SEC rules. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown disregard the impact of potential forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.

(7) The amounts in “All Other Compensation” consist of health insurance benefits, vehicle allowance, long-term and short-term disability insurance benefits, car allowance, and 401K matching amounts.

 

Name and Fiscal         Option  All Other     
Position Year Salary ($)  Bonus ($)  Awards($)(1)  Compensation ($)  Total ($)(2) 

John R. Regazzi

 

2018

 $217,691  $  $63,841  $1,144  $282,676 

Chief Executive Officer

 

2017

  250,000         1,795   251,795 

Suresh Nair

 

2018

  169,495         1,641   171,136 

Former Co-Chief Executive Officer (3)

 

2017

  0             

William J. Thompson

 

2018

  67,134            67,134 

Former Acting Chief Executive Officer (4)

 

2017

  146,154            146,154 

Lutz P. Henckels

 

2018

  20,000      132,000   35,078   187,078 

EVP and Interim Chief Financial Officer

 

2017

  0             
(Principal Accounting Officer) (5)                      

Michael R. Penta (6)

 

2018

  72,987   54,713      637   128,337 

Former Vice President, Sales

 

2017

  200,000   80,426      3,183   283,609 

James Taber

 

2018

  166,076   8,848      1,425   176,349 

Former Vice President, Sales and Marketing (7)

 

2017

  0             

Temi Oduozor (8)

 

2018

  161,515         1,504   163,019 

Former Corporate Controller

 

2017

  95,684         806   96,490 

(1) Mr. Regazzi was granted 100,000 new stock options exercisable at $0.33 per share on March 30, 2018. On March 30, 2018, the Company repriced Mr. Regazzi’s option for 100,000 shares expiring December 14, 2021 with an original exercise price

76
Table of $1.64 per share, his option for 99,750 shares expiring on August 22, 2022 with an exercise price of $1.42 per share and his option for 100,000 shares expiring March 13, 2023 with an exercise price of $1.65 per share. As repriced, the exercise price for each option is $0.33 per share, which was the fair market value per share on March 30, 2018. In connection with his appointment as Interim Chief Financial Officer, Dr. Henckels received a special grant of a non-qualified option for 400,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $0.33 per share on March 30, 2018.

(2) Includes consulting fees for Dr. Henckels of $35,078 during the 2018 fiscal year and matching contributions made by Giga-tronics to its 401(k) Plan. 

(3) Employment terminated as of December 22, 2017.

(4) Employment terminated on June 21, 2017.

(5) Appointed Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer as of February 22, 2018.

(6) Employment terminated on July 7, 2017.

(7) Employment terminated on May 4, 2018.

(8) Employment terminated as of February 23, 2018.

Contents


The Company does not have employment agreements with any of its executive officers, though it has entered into to change in control agreements with certain officers as described below.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table sets forth information about stock options held by the named executive officersoptions; unexercised options; stock that has not vested; and equity incentive plan awards for each Named Executive Officers outstanding as of March 31, 2018,at the end of the Company’s 2018 fiscal year.year 2022. All option exercise prices were based on market price on the date of grant. Equity incentive plan awards reflect non-plan awards the Company assumed in the Business Combination.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

 

Name

 

Shares subject to

Unexercised

Options

(#) Exercisable

  

Shares subject to
Unexercised

Options

(#) Unexercisable

  

Option Exercise

Price ($)

 

Expiration Date

(a)

 

(b)

  

(c)

  

(d)

 

(e) (1)

John R. Regazzi (2)

     100,000  $0.33 

3/30/2028

   100,000     $0.33 

12/15/2021

   99,750     $0.33 

8/22/2022

   100,000     $0.33 

3/13/2023

Suresh Nair

  10,000   40,000  $1.26 

4/27/2026

William J. Thompson

  15,000     $1.64 

12/15/2021

   18,000     $1.53 

4/24/2023

   4,400   1,100  $2.47 

7/1/2024

   3,300   2,200  $1.84 

2/25/2025

Lutz P. Henckels

  2,200   3,300  $2.47 

7/1/2024

      400,000  $0.33 

3/30/2028

Jim Taber

  5,000   20,000  $0.84 

2/22/2027

Temi Oduozor

  21,000   14,000  $1.48 

12/17/2024

    Shares subject to  Shares subject to      
Name Award Unexercised Options  Unexercised Options  Option Exercise  Expiration Date
  Type # Exercisable  # Unexercisable  Price ($)   
(a) (b) (c)  (d)  (e)  (f) (1)
Jonathan Read Option  229,053   70,798   2.97  05/25/26
Jonathan Read Restricted Stock Unit  79,127   70,798      
                 
Timothy Long Option  152,701   47,199   2.97  05/25/26
Timothy Long Restricted Stock Unit  52,751   47,199      
                 
John R. Regazzi Option  6,665      4.95  03/13/23
John R. Regazzi Option  6,671      4.95  03/30/28
John R. Regazzi Option  13,341      4.05  12/18/28
John R. Regazzi Option  13,341      4.95  04/14/29
John R. Regazzi Option  7,200      3.51  12/29/30
                 
Lutz P. Henckels Option  365      37.05  07/01/24
Lutz P. Henckels Option  26,683      4.50  09/30/28
Lutz P. Henckels Option  13,341      4.05  12/18/28
Lutz P. Henckels Option  13,341      4.95  04/14/29
Lutz P. Henckels Option  13,000      3.51  12/29/30

 

Employment Agreements

Upon the consummation of the Business Combination, Gresham’s obligations under Employment Agreements and Offer Letters with its officers were assumed by the Company. The following describes such agreements as well as oral employment arrangements with our Named Executive Officers. 

Jonathan Read. Effective on September 15, 2020, Gresham entered into a four-year Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Read (“Read’s Employment Agreement”) to serve as its Chief Executive Officer. Read’s Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Read receives a base salary of $250,000 per year, which will be subject to an upward adjustment as shall be determined by Gresham’s Board, plus a $500 per month car allowance. In addition to a base salary and a car allowance, in the event Gresham achieves annual revenue of no less than $25,000,000, Mr. Read is eligible to receive an executive performance bonus for each such year based on Gresham’s net income. 

Upon the termination of Mr. Read’s employment, he will be entitled to receive any earned but unpaid base salary through the termination date, and any accrued but unused vacation. Further, unless Mr. Read’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or disability or for “Cause” or Mr. Read terminates his Employment Agreement without “Good Reason” (as defined in Read’s Employment Agreement) Mr. Read would be entitled to severance payments as follows: (i) 12 months of Mr. Read’s base salary and (ii) a prorated bonus amount.

Timothy Long. Effective April 1, 2021, Gresham entered into a three-year Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Long (“Long’s Employment Agreement”) to serve as its Chief Operating Officer. Long’s Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Long receives a base salary of $250,000 per year. In addition to a base salary and a car allowance of $1,000 per month, in the event Gresham achieves annual revenue of no less than $25,000,000, Mr. Long is eligible to receive an executive performance bonus for each such year based on Gresham’s net income. Moreover, Mr. Long may be entitled to an annual revenue bonus if Gresham achieves annual gross margins of no less than 35%.

 

(1)

77

Column (e) shows the contractually scheduled expiration date. In case of the termination of employment of Messrs. Nair, Taber and Ms. Oduozor, the exercise period expires 90 days after termination of employment rather than on the original contractually scheduled expiration dates. 

(2)

On March 30, 2018, the Company repriced Mr. Regazzi’s option for 100,000 shares expiring December 14, 2021 with an original exercise priceTable of $1.64 per share, his option for 99,750 shares expiring on August 22, 2022 with an exercise price of $1.42 per share and his option for 100,000 shares expiring March 13, 2023 with an exercise price of $1.65 per share. As repriced, the exercise price for each option is $0.33 per share, which was the fair market value per share on March 30, 2018.

Contents


 

Equity Compensation Plan InformationUpon the termination of Mr. Long’s employment, he will be entitled to receive any earned but unpaid base salary, and any accrued but unused vacation. Further, unless Mr. Long’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or disability or for “Cause” or Mr. Long terminates his Employment Agreement without “Good Reason” (as defined in Long’s Employment Agreement), Mr. Long would be entitled to severance payments as follows: (i) six months of Mr. Long’s base salary and (ii) a prorated bonus amount.

 

The following table provides information on optionsLutz Henckels. Mr. Henckels is employed under an oral agreement that pays him a salary of $280,000 per year. Moreover, in connection with the commencement of his employment with us and otheroutside of our equity rights outstanding and available at March 31, 2018.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 
  


No. of securities to

be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

stock awards,

warrants and rights

  

Weighted average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

stock awards,

warrants and rights

  

No. of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under

equity compensation

plans (excluding

securities reflected in

column (a)

 

Plan Category

 

(a)

  

(b)

  

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  1,478,700  $0.56   456,677 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders-options (1)

  400,000   0.33   n/a 

Total

  1,878,700  $0.51   456,677 

(1)         Reflects a grant of nonqualified options forincentive plans, Mr. Henckels was granted an option to acquire 400,000 shares of common stock to Dr. Henckels in considerationat the price of employment of an employee and officer. The exercise price is $0.33 per shareshare.

John Regazzi. On January 31, 2023 (the “Effective Date”) we entered into a Termination and Release Agreement with Mr. John Regazzi a director, who served as our Chief Executive Officer until the vesting schedule is 25% after one year and 1/48thclosing of the original grant each month thereafter.Business Combination, whereby Mr. Regazzi agreed to resign as a full-time employee effective as of the Effective Date. We agreed to pay Mr. Regazzi (a) $17,500 in unpaid expenses, payable on the Effective Date, (b) $82,266 in unpaid deferred salary payable on the Effective Date; (c) $100,000 in an unpaid bonus related to the acquisition of Gresham payable in essentially equal installments over an 18-month initially commencing in January 2024;(d) $325,000 in retirement compensation payable over an 18-month period commencing in January 2024; and (e) COBRA reimbursement until such time as Mr. Regazzi can transition to Medicare. In addition, to this compensation, we owe Mr. Regazzi $36,000 in paid time off compensation, which will be payable over 12 months. Mr. Regazzi is remaining as a part-time employee at the rate of $125 per hour for up to 20 hours per month.

 

On September 20, 2018, our shareholders approved our new 2018 Equity Incentive Plan under which we may issue up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise options, stock awards and grants. With the adoption of the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, no further awards will be issued under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, though all awards under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan that are outstanding will continue to be governed by the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the plan and any applicable award agreement.

Change-In-Control Arrangements

All outstanding options may accelerate and become exercisable for fully vested shares of common stock upon a change in control of Giga-tronics, whether effected through merger, sale of substantially all of Giga-tronics’ assets, the successful completion of a hostile tender offer for 30% or more of Giga-tronics’ outstanding common stock, or a change in the majority of the Board as a result of one or more contested elections for Board membership.

 

In order to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of certain key members of management, we have entered into change in control agreements and severance agreementsSeverance Agreements with certain executive officers including Mr. Regazzi (our then Chief Executive Officer), Mr. Henckels, Mr. Armand Pantalone, our Chief technology Officer, and Mr. Ursprung.  Underone other executive. The Severance Agreements are, among other things, designed to avoid the Company’s terminationloss of employment andthese employees in the event of a potential or following a change of control agreements, officers are entitled to receive some or all of the following benefits: severance pay, payment of coverage premiums for health, dental, and vision benefits for and executive officers and their covered dependents, if any, pursuant to COBRA and accelerated vesting of any unvested restricted stock awards or options to purchasein our common stock as of the date of termination.

Company. Under Mr. Regazzi’sHenckels’ agreement, he receiveswill receive such salary and other benefits described below for 1512 months and acceleration of all unvested equity awards if he is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, as defined in his Agreement, within 12 months following a change of control. Each would receive 12 months of salary and payment of COBRA premiums following an involuntary termination if made prior to 12 months following a change in control. Under their respective Agreements, Mr. Pantalone and the other executive would be entitled to six months of base salary if either of them resigns for good reason, as defined in his agreement, in connection with a change of control and 12 months for an involuntary termination other than for cause. Pursuant to Mr. Ursprung’s offer letter, the Company intends to enter into its standard form written severance agreementor is terminated without cause, whether or not in connection with Mr. Ursprung, providing severance of nine months base salary for an involuntary termination other than for cause.a change in control.

 


Consummation of the Business Combination on September 8, 2022, constitutes a change of control for this purpose. However, in connection with our entry into the Share Exchange Agreement, each of our then executive officers agreed to waive his right to receive severance benefits under his existing Severance Agreement as a result of a change in his title or responsibilities or reporting structure. In exchange for the waivers, on December 24, 2021, we agreed to grant each of Mr. Regazzi and Mr. Henckels 10 restricted shares of our common stock and each of Mr. Pantalone and the other executive 10,000 restricted shares of our common stock, all of which vested on December 24, 2022. 

 

Compensation of Directors

 

ForThe following table sets forth information about the compensation paid to the Company’s non-employee directors in fiscal year 2018, no director received cash payment2022. 

  Fees    
Name Earned or    
  Cash paid  Total 
(a) (1) (2)($)  ($) 
Jeffrey Bentz      
Robert Smith      
William B. Horne      
John R. Regazzi      
William J. Thompson      
Thomas E. Vickers  11,000   11,000 

78

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following chart reflects the number of securities granted and the weighted average exercise price for servicesour compensation plans as a director. Mr. Almquist received annual fees of $89,900 consisting of $44,000 in cash fees for serving as the Audit Committee Chair; a restricted share award of 26,000 common shares; an option grant for 11,000 common shares which vests at the rate of 20% per year; and $25,000 in cash for consulting fees. Mr. Henckels earned consulting fees prior to his appointment as our Chief Financial Officer, as reflected in the table below. From time to time, Giga-tronics makes discretionary grants of options to purchase shares of its common stock to directors in consideration for services they provide to Giga-tronics as members of the Board. For fiscal year 2018 no directors other than Mr. Almquist, received a discretionary grant of options. The restricted stock award described above vested fully on MarchDecember 31, 2018.2022:

     No. of securities to be  Weighted Average 
  No. of restricted stock  issued upon exercise of  exercise price of 
  units and awards  outstanding options  outstanding options 
Plan Category outstanding  (a)  (b) 

Equity compensation plans approved by security

holders:

         
2023 Equity Incentive Plan  249,875   499,751  $2.97 
2018 Equity Incentive Plan  10,000   238,443  $4.29 
2005 Equity Incentive Plan     58,764  $5.90 
Total  259,875   796,958  $3.58 

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

 

The following table summarizes compensation paid to directors (other than Mr. Regazzi, whose compensation in all capacities is included in the Executive Compensation Tablesets forth, as previously set forth) in fiscal year 2018.

Director Compensation

Name

 

Fees

Earned or

Cash Paid

($)

  

Option

Awards

(1) ($)

  

Restricted

Stock

Awards

(2) ($)

  

Change in

Pension

Value and Non-

qualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

  

All Other

Compensation

(3) ($)

  

Total ($)

 
                         

Gordon L. Almquist

 $44,000  $3,740  $17,160   --  $25,000  $89,900 

John R. Regazzi

    $  $   --  $--  $ 

Lutz P. Henckels

    $  $   --  $25,000  $25,000 

Jamie Weston

    $  $   --  $--  $ 

William J. Thompson

    $  $   --  $43,269  $43,269 

(1)

The value for stock option awards in the table above represents grant date fair value of stock option awards. For option awards, the dollar amount for each individual varies depending on the number of options granted, the fair value of such options, and the vesting terms of such options. See Note 1 of the 2018 Audited Financial Statements for information on the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of option awards and the expense recognized under ASC 718. At March 31, 2018, Dr. Henckels held options to purchase 405,500 shares of common stock, Dr. Thompson held options to purchase 44,000 shares of common stock, Mr. Almquist held options to purchase 71,500 shares of common stock, and Mr. Weston held no options.

(2)

Restricted shares were granted in lieu of cash compensation for fiscal year 2018 with the weighted average grant date fair value of $0.66 per share.

(3)

Consulting Fees in fiscal year 2018 were $25,000 for Mr. Almquist and $25,000 for Dr. Henckels. Cash compensation in fiscal year 2018 of $43,269 for Dr. Thompson was earnings in capacity as co-Chief Executive Officer.  

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

CHANGE IN ACCOUNTANTS

Armanino LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 fiscal year. Crowe LLP (“Crowe”) served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2017 fiscal year.

On January 4, 2018, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of Armanino LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018, after completing a competitive bid process. As a result of the engagement of Armanino LLP, the Company dismissed Crowe from that role on that date.


During the Company’s two preceding fiscal years and through January 4, 2018, (i) there were no disagreements with Crowe on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to Crowe’s satisfaction, would have caused Crowe to make reference to the subject matter in connection with their reports on the Company’s financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no reportable events, within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of SEC Regulation S-K. Crowe’s report on the financial statements of the Company for the Company’s 2017 fiscal year included a qualification based on the Company’s disclosure that certain matters raised substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Crowe’s reports stated that the consolidated financial statements did not include any adjustments that might result from the outcomedate of this uncertainty.

The Company provided CroweProspectus, certain information with a copy of the disclosures in its Form 8-K describing its change in independent accountants and requested that Crowe furnish it with a letter addressedrespect to the SEC stating whether or not Crowe agreed with these statements. Crowe provided such a letter, which the Company included with its Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 8, 2018.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table includes information as of September 28, 2018, concerning the beneficial ownership of Giga-tronics’our common stock for each person known by Giga-tronics to own beneficially more than 5% of Giga-tronics’ outstanding common stock and common stock equivalents; each director; each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table above; and all directors and executive officers of Giga-tronics as a group. In accordance with SEC rules, beneficial ownership includes shares that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days. The address of all officers and directors of Giga-tronics is c/o Giga-tronics Incorporated, 5990 Gleason Drive, Dublin, California 94568.by:

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

Name of Beneficial Owner and Position(s) with the Company

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

Percentage of Total

Outstanding Common

Stock

Gordon L. Almquist, Director

233,500

 

(1)

2.12%

Lutz P. Henckels, EVP, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director

 4,117,660

 (2)

29.39%

John R. Regazzi, Chief Executive Officer and Director

809,450

 

(3)

7.04%

William J. Thompson, Chairman of the Board

4,089,776

 

(4)

29.37%

Jamie Weston, Director

3,956,456

 

(5)

28.49%

Armand Pantalone, Chief Technology Officer

4,000

 

(6)

 0.40%

Timothy Ursprung, Vice President Sales and Marketing

60,000

 

(7)

0.55%

All executive officers and directors as a group

1,397,474

 

(8)

12.33%

(7 persons, including those above)

 

 

 

 

Alara Capital AVI II, LC

3,956,456 

 

(9)

28.49%

1045 First Avenue

 

 

 

 

King of Prussia, PA 19406

 

 

 

 

Thomas Leonard

2,207,000 

 

(10)

17.88%

1617 John F. Kennedy Blvd 19th Floor

 

 

 

 

Philadelphia, PA 19103

 

 

 

 

Porter Capital Management

1,250,000

 

(11)

10.26%

300 Drakes Landing Road

    

Greenbrae, CA 94904

    

 

*

Indicates lesseach shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 1%

(1)

Includes 30,000 shares5% of our common stock, issuable upon conversion of 300 Series E Shares.

(2)

Includes 120,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 1,200 Series E Shares. Also includes 3,956,456 shares beneficially owned by Alara Capital AVI II, LLC with respect to which Dr. Henckels shares voting and dispositive power as a managing member of Alara Capital AVI II, LLC.

(3)

Includes 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 2,000 Series E Shares.

(4)

Includes 3,956,456 shares beneficially owned by Alara Capital AVI II, LLC with respect to which Dr. Thompson shares voting and dispositive power as a managing member of Alara Capital AVI II, LLC.

(5)

Includes 3,956,456 shares beneficially owned by Alara Capital AVI II, LLC with respect to which Mr. Weston shares voting and dispositive power as a managing member of Spring Mountain Capital.

(6)

Includes 40,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 400 Series E Shares.

(7)

Includes 60,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 600 Series E Shares.

 


each of our current directors and named executive officers, and

 

(8)

Excludes 3,956,456 shares beneficially owned by Alara Capital AVI II, LLC.

(9)

Includes 1,010,034 common shares, preferred shares convertible to 1,853,351all of common sharesour executive officers and warrants exercisable into 1,093,071 common shares, totaling 3,956,456 of beneficially owned shares.

(10)

Includes 804,000 common shares and warrants exercisable for 603,000 common shares, and 800,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 8,000 Series E Shares, totaling 2,207,000 of beneficially owned shares.

(11)

Information is based ondirectors as a Schedule 13G filed by Porter Capital Management Co (“PCMC”) on April 2, 2018. Includes 950,000 of common stock issuable upon conversion of 9,500 Series E Shares and warrants exercisable for 300,000 common shares, totaling 1,250,000 of beneficially owned shares.  Of this total, Porter Partners, L.P. holds 8,000 Series E Shares and warrants exercisable into 255,000 common shares and EDJ Limited holds 1,500 Series E Shares and warrants exercisable into 45,000 common shares. PCMC is a general partnership and is the general partner of Porter Partners, L.P. and the investment manager of EDJ Limited. Jeffrey H. Porter is the managing partner of PCMC. 

group.

 

SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

Up to 11,624,452 shares of common stock are being offered by this prospectus, all of which are being registered for sale for the accounts of the Selling Securityholders. No shares are being sold by the Company. Although the Selling Securityholders may sell their shares at any time the Registration Statement, of which the prospectus is a part is effective, there is no way for the Company to determine when shares will be sold.

Each of the transactions by which the Selling Securityholders acquired their securities from us was exempt under the registration provisions of the Securities Act. The shares of common stock referred to above are being registered to permit public resales of the shares and the Selling Securityholders may offer the shares for resale from time to time pursuant to this prospectus. The Selling Securityholders may also sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or a portion of their shares in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. We may from time to time include additional Selling Securityholders in supplements or amendments to this prospectus.

The table below sets forth certain information regarding the Selling Securityholders and the shares of our common stock offered by them in this prospectus. None of the Selling Securityholders have had a material relationship with us within the past three years other than as described elsewhere in this prospectus. To our knowledge, subject to community property laws where applicable, each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock set forth opposite such person’s name. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to such securities. Except as otherwise indicated, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days and underlying and convertible securities, are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such option or warrants but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The address of all officers and directors is c/o Giga-tronics Incorporated, 7272 E. Indian School Rd, Suite 540, Scottsdale, Arizona.

 

79

Each Selling Securityholder’s percentage of ownership of our outstanding shares in the table below is based on 14,390,605

  As of the Date of this Prospectus  After the Distribution 
Beneficial Owner Number of
shares of
Common Stock
  Percentage of Class  Number of shares
of Common Stock
  Percentage of Class 
Jonathan Read, Chief Executive Officer and Director(1)  266,534   4.30%  266,534   * 
Timothy Long, Chief Operating Officer(2)  177,689   2.91%  177,689   * 
Lutz P. Henckels, Chief Financial Officer(3)  114,373   1.91%  114,373   * 
William B. Horne, Director(4)  2,934,985   49.48%  3,838,708   4.99%
John Regazzi, Director(5)  90,290   1.51%  90,290   * 
Jeffrey Bentz, Director     *      * 
Robert Smith, Director     *      * 
William J. Thompson, Director(6)  28,214   *   28,214   * 
Thomas E. Vickers, Director(7)  25,909   *   25,909   * 
All executive officers and directors as a group of 9 individuals  3,637,994   56.03%  4,541,717   5.86%
Laurence Lytton(8)  603,700   10.18%  603,700   * 
Ault Alliance, Inc.(4)  2,934,985   49.48%  311,531   * 
Milton C. Ault, III(9)  2,934,985   49.48%  311,531   * 

* Indicates less than 1% beneficial ownership.

(1) Includes 266,534 shares of common stock outstanding asissuable under options exercisable within 60 days of September 28, 2018, except where noted. The number ofJuly 21, 2023. Excludes 149,925 shares beneficially owned after the after this offering assumes that all shares offered hereby are sold.


 

Shares of

Common

Stock

That May

be Sold in

this Offering

Shares of Common

Beneficially Owned

After this Offering

 

Name

 Shares

Shares

Shares

Percent

John R. Regazzi (1)

 549,150 

260,300

809,450

5.63%

Thomas Leonard (2)

       804,000

1,403,000

2,207,000

15.34%

Porter Partners, L.P. (3)

 400,000 

1,250,000

1,650,000

11.47%

Gordon L. Almquist (4)

 203,500

30,000

233,500

1.62%

Bruce L. and Kathryn M. Evans JTWROS (5)

 40,200 

130,150

170,150

1.18%

Jon D. and Linda W. Gruber Trust (6)

402,011 

1,501,508

1,903,519

13.23%

Peter G. Stanley and Susan H. Stanley (7) JTWROS

201,000 

650,750

851,750

5.92%

Lutz P. Henckels (8)

    3,997,660

120,000

4,117,660

28.62%

Scott R. McQueen Revocable Trust (9)

241,200 

780,900

1,022,100

7.10%

Jay D. Seid (10)

40,200 

130,150

170,350

1.18%

The Kingdom Trust Company Custodian FBO McBee Butcher, Jr. IRA (11)

32,160 

104,120

136,280

*

Burt Spottiswoode and Cheri Griffiths JTWROS (12)

 64,320 

128,240

192,560

1.34%

Thomas Tourish (13)

40,200 

130,150

170,350

1.18%

VFT Special Ventures LTD (14)

-

580,477

580,477

4.03%

Rene M. Haas (15)

-

800,000

800,000

5.56%

Ernesto K. Halim and Joan-Ina Rosario (16)

-

120,000

120,000

*

Daniel Kirby (17)

-

200,000

200,000

1.39%

Timothy F. and Kathleen F. Ursprung Joint Tenants (18)

-

60,000

60,000

*

Jeffrey Henckels (19)

-

40,000

40,000

*

Claire Barresi (20)

-

60,000

60,000

*

Robert Cutler (21)

-

60,000

60,000

*

Joseph D. Ross (22)

-

100,000

100,000

*

Joan Plastiras Revocable Living Trust (23)

-

200,000

200,000

1.39%

Jorge A. Briones, Jr. (24)

-

24,000

24,000

*

Albert P. Guarino (25)

-

60,000

60,000

*

Troy O. and Traci K. Mitchell (26)

-

30,000

30,000

*

Steven F. Foster (27)

-

100,000

100,000

*

John and Barbara Oppenheimer Family Trust dtd May 28, 1996 (28)

-

60,000

60,000

*

Juan S. Utreras and Maria A. Castro (29)

 -

60,000

60,000

*

Jacqueline W. Barr, GST Exempt Trust (30)

-

60,000

60,000

*

Maria Castro (31)

-

26,000

26,000

*

Ligia Cortez (32)

-

40,000

40,000

*

Armand Pantalone (33)

4,000

40,000

44,000

*

Officers and Directors

    

Total:

 

7,019,601

9,339,745

16,359,346

 

* less than 1%.

(1)

Mr. Regazzi has served as the Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company since April 2006. Securities to be offered include 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 60,300 shares of common stock issued upon exercise of warrants.

(2)

Securities to be offered include 800,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 603,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(3)

Securities to be offered include 950,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 300,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. Of this total, Porter Partners, L.P. holds 800,000 shares of common stock and 255,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants and EDJ Limited holds 150,000 shares of common stock and 45,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.


(4)

Securities to be offered include 30,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(5)

Securities to be offered include 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 30,150 shares of common stock issued upon exercise of warrants.

(6)

Securities to be offered include 1,200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 301,508 shares of common stock issued upon exercise of warrants.

(7)

Securities to be offered include 500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 150,750 shares of common stock issued upon exercise of warrants.

(8)

Securities to be offered include 120,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares. Also includes 3,956,456 shares beneficially owned by Alara Capital AVI II, LLC with respect to which Mr. Henckels shares voting and dispositive power as a managing member of Alara Capital AVI II, LLC

(9)

Securities to be offered include 600,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 180,900 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(10)

Securities to be offered include 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 30,150 shares of common stock issued upon exercise of warrants.

(11)

Securities to be offered include 80,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 24,120 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(12)

Securities to be offered include 80,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares and 48,240 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(13)

Securities to be offered include 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series E Shares and 30,150 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(14)

Securities to be offered include 580,477 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. VFT Special Ventures LTD is a wholly owned subsidiary of Emerging Growth Equities, Ltd, a registered broker-dealer. Emerging Growth Equities, Ltd received these warrants as part of its consideration for serving as placement agent in connection with the private placement. Emerging Growth Equities, Ltd did not receive its warrants as compensation for underwriting activities. Of this total, VFT Special Ventures LTD holds 517,954 shares of common stock, and Daniel C. Gardner 31,261 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants and Cheri Lee Griffiths 31,262 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(15)

Securities to be offered include 800,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(16)

Securities to be offered include 120,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(17)

Securities to be offered include 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(18)

Securities to be offered include 60,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(19)

Securities to be offered include 40,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(20)

Securities to be offered include 60,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(21)

Securities to be offered include 60,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(22)

Securities to be offered include 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(23)

Securities to be offered include 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(24)

Securities to be offered include 24,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(25)

Securities to be offered include 60,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(26)

Securities to be offered include 30,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(27)

Securities to be offered include 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(28)

Securities to be offered include 60,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(29)

Securities to be offered include 60,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(30)

Securities to be offered include 60,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(31)

Securities to be offered include 26,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(32)

Securities to be offered include 40,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.

(33)

Securities to be offered include 40,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion Series E Shares.


PLAN OF DISTRIBUTIONissuable under restricted stock units issued on May 25, 2021.

 

Up to 11,624,452(2)Includes 177,689 shares of common stock are being offered by this prospectus, allissuable under options exercisable within 60 days of which are being registered for sale for the accounts of the Selling Securityholders. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the Selling Securityholders of theJuly 21, 2023. Excludes 99,950 shares of common stock. If we receive proceeds from the exercise of warrants by Selling Securityholders, we will use the proceeds for working capital purposes. The Company will bear all fees and expenses incident to this registration.issuable under restricted stock units issued on May 25, 2021.

 

The Selling Securityholders may sell all or a portion of the(3)Includes 66,286 shares of common stock beneficially owned by them and offered hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. Ifissuable under options exercisable within 60 days of July 21, 2023.

(4)As of the date of this Prospectus, includes 2,920,085 shares of common stock are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the Selling Securityholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions. heand excludes 3,960,043 shares of common stock issuable on conversion of 514.8 shares of Series F and shares of common stock issuable upon conversion and exercise of notes and warrants. These shares will be distributed to AAI’s stockholders as part of the Distribution. Also includes 14,900 shares of our common stock held by a subsidiary of AAI. Consists of shares held by AAI, of which Mr. Horne may be solddeemed the beneficial owner since he is the Chief Executive Officer of AAI. Following the Distribution, AAI’s shares, subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation, will consist of 46,545,860 shares issuable from conversion of Convertible Notes at $0.25 per share, and the exercise of 2,000,000 Warrants at $0.01 per share. The numbers reported post Distribution for Mr. Horne and all officers and directors as a group vary slightly from Mr. Milton C. Ault III’s beneficial ownership as reflected in oneNote (9).

(5)Includes 40,553 shares of common stock issuable under options exercisable within 60 days of July 21, 2023

(6)Includes 7,040 shares of common stock issuable under options exercisable within 60 days of July 21, 2023

(7)Includes 2,412 shares of common stock issuable under options exercisable within 60 days of July 21, 2023

(8)Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Laurence W. Lytton on February 3, 2023. Excludes 230,769 shares issuable under exercise of prefunded warrant. Mr. Lytton’s address is 467 Central Park West, New York, NY 10025

(9)Information is based on a Schedule 13D filed by Mr. Milton C. Ault, III, Executive Chairman of Ault and Mr. Horne, Chief Executive Officer of Ault. The principal business address of Messrs. Ault and Horne is c/o Ault Alliance, Inc., 11411 Southern Highlands Parkway, Suite 240, Las Vegas, Nevada 89141

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We describe below each transaction or moreseries of similar transactions, at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale (ifother than compensation arrangements for our executive officers and directors, since January 1, 2021, to which we were a public market exists), at varying prices determined at the time of sale,party or at negotiated prices. All sales maywill be effecteda party, in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions:which:

 

 

on any national securities exchange or quotation service on which the securities may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;

 

in the over-the-counter market;

in transactions otherwise than on these exchangesamounts involved exceeded or systemswill exceed the lesser of (i) $120,000 or in(ii) one percent of the over-the-counter market;

average of our total assets as of the end of our last two fiscal years; and

 

 

through the writing of options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;

 

ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell theany of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our securities, as agent but may position and resell a portionor any member of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

an exchange distribution in accordance with the rulesimmediate family of the applicable exchange;

privately negotiated transactions;

short sales;

sales pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act;

broker-dealers may agree with the selling security holders to sellforegoing persons, had or will have a specified number of such securities at a stipulated price per share;

a combination of any such methods of sale; and

any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

direct or indirect material interest.

 

80

If

AAI Financing

On December 31, 2022, we entered into an Exchange Agreement and a Securities Purchase Agreement with AAI and Ault Lending issuing them convertible notes and warrants.

Under the Selling Securityholders effect such transactions by sellingSecured Note, Ault Lending advanced us an additional $1,259,407. More recently, AAI has advanced us an additional $165,000. No written note has been executed. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations – Our Recent Financings.”

Upon consummation of the Distribution, neither AAI, nor Ault Lending, will directly own any shares of our common stock but will have the right to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions inacquire up to 44,530,960 shares of our common stock upon the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the Selling Securityholders or commissions from purchasersconversion of the Convertible Notes (assuming, for illustrative purposes only, that the Conversion Price when the Convertible Notes are actually converted will be $0.25 and accrued interest thereon is paid in cash) and 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for whom they may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal (which discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may be in excess of those customary inupon the types of transactions involved). In connection with salesexercise of the shares of common stock or otherwise, the Selling Securityholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn engage in short sales of shares of common stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The Selling Securityholders may also sell shares of common stock short and deliver shares of common stock covered by this prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed common stock in connection with such short sales. The Selling Securityholders may also loan or pledge common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares of common stock.warrant.

 


Allocation of General Corporate Expenses

 

We provide this information using our new December 31 fiscal year we adopted following the Business Combination. AAI provided human resources, accounting, and other services to Gresham and after September 8th to us. Gresham obtained its business insurance under AAI’s policies. The Selling Securityholdersaccompanying financial statements of Gresham include allocations of these expenses. The allocation method calculates the appropriate share of overhead costs to Gresham by using Gresham’s revenue as a percentage of total revenue of AAI. Gresham believes the allocation methodology used is reasonable and has been consistently applied, and results in an appropriate allocation of costs incurred. However, these allocations may pledge or grant a security interest in some or allnot be indicative of the sharescost had Gresham been a stand-alone entity or of common stock owned by themfuture costs. AAI allocated $1.39 million and if they default$1.09 million for years ended December 31, 2021 and 2022 and zero dollars for the three months ended March 21, 2023.

Net Transfers from AAI

In addition to the AAI Financing described above, Gresham received funding from AAI to cover any shortfalls on operating cash requirements which are summarized below. Including the allocation of general corporate expenses and cash advances beyond the Secured Note, Gresham owed AAI a total of zero dollars at March 31, 2023.

AAI’s Historical Bridge Loan to us

As our negotiations with Gresham and AAI became serious, in November 2021, Ault Lending us $500,000 (the “Bridge Loan”) for general corporate purposes, including operating expenses. We borrowed an additional $300,000 on January 7, 2022, and an additional $500,000 on April 5, 2022, and the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus or any amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provisionoutstanding principal amount of the Securities Act, amending, if necessary, the list of Selling Securityholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as Selling Securityholders under this prospectus. The Selling Securityholders also may transfer and donate the shares of common stock in other circumstances in which case the transferees, donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.Bridge Loan totaled $1,300,000.

 

The Selling Securityholderspromissory note evidencing the Bridge Loan was exchanged for the Exchange Note on December 31, 2022. See “Management’s Discussion and any broker-dealer participating inAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Our Recent Financings.

AAI’s Closing Date Loan to us upon the distributionClosing of the shares of common stock may be deemed to be “underwriters” withinBusiness Combination

On September 8, 2022, AAI loaned us $4,250,000 upon the meaningclosing of the Securities Act,Business Combination. The loan was evidenced by a convertible note, that was issued to AAI. We refer to this loan as the “Closing Date Loan.” The promissory note evidencing the Closing Date Loan was exchanged for the Exchange Note on December 31, 2022. See “Management’s Discussion and any commission paid, or any discounts or concessions allowedAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Our recent Financings.

Advances made from AAI to any such broker-dealer may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. At the time a particular offering of the shares of common stock is made, a prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed which will set forthUs and Gresham

Through December 31, 2022, AAI advanced Gresham money for working capital purposes in the aggregate amount of shares of common stock being offered and$9,873,332 (which following September 8, 2022, were advanced to us). Of this amount prior to the termsclosing of the offering, includingBusiness Combination, $4,067,409 was classified as a capital contribution and advances previously made by Ault Lending to us in the name or namesaggregate amount of any broker-dealers or agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation from the Selling Securityholders and any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to broker-dealers. $4,067,469 were rolled into a secured note on December 31, 2022.

81

Recent AAI Financing

 

UnderFor a discussion on our recent financing transactions with AAI on December 31, 2022, see above under “AAI Financing,” which is described in more detail under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources -Our Recent Financings - AAI Financings.”

Recent Loans

Beginning in the securities lawsSpring 2023, we borrowed $50,000 from Lutz Henckels, our Chief Financial Officer and $50,000 from William B. Horne, a director and Chief Executive Officer of AAI. These loans are not documented by any writing and effectively are due on demand.

Beginning on June 2, 2023, Jonathan Read, our Chief Executive Officer, Timothy Long, our Chief Operating Officer and Lutz Henckels, our Chief Financial Officer deferred a total of $8,289, $2,328 and $8,289 respectively, in salary which sums are accrued.

Interest of Executive Officers and Directors in the Transaction with Giga-tronics

In connection with the closing of the Business Combination and as required by the Share Exchange Agreement, we repurchased and redeemed outstanding preferred stock (other than the Series F), (the “Outstanding Preferred Shares”) at the stated liquidation preference amount of such shares. Our Chief Financial Officer (Lutz Henckels) and one of our directors (Thomas E. Vickers) held some states,of the outstanding preferred stock that we purchased on the same terms and price as shares of commonthe outstanding preferred stock may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the shares of common stock may not be sold unless such securities have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

There can be no assurance that any Selling Securityholder will sell any or all of the shares of common stock registered pursuantheld by other shareholders. We paid Mr. Henckels $246,000 to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

The Selling Securityholders and any other person participating in such distribution will be subject to applicable provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, Regulation M of the Exchange Act, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares of common stock by the Selling Securityholders and any other participating person. Regulation M may also restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the shares of common stock to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the shares of commonredeem his outstanding preferred stock and the ability of any person or entitypaid Mr. Vickers $116,000 to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of commonredeem his outstanding preferred stock.

 

Severance Agreements

We had entered into Severance Agreements with each of John Regazzi, our former Chief Executive Officer and a current director; Lutz Henckels, our Chief Financial Officer; Armand Pantalone, our Chief Technology Officer; and one other executive. See “Management.”

DESCRIPTION OF OUR SECURITIES

General

 

We have 40,000,000100,000,000 shares of authorized common stock, no par value, of which 10,939,011 (including 250,0005,931,582 shares of unvested restricted stock) shares wereare outstanding as of September 28, 2018.the date of this Prospectus. We have 1,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock, of which 250,000 are designated asis more fully described below. Since the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (“F will be converted prior to the Distribution the Series A Preferred Stock”), none of which are outstanding; 10,000 are designated as Series B Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, or “Series B Preferred Stock,” of which 9,997 are outstanding; 3,500 shares of Series C Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, or “Series C Preferred Stock,” of which 3,424.65 are outstanding, 6,000 shares of Series D Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, or Series D Preferred Stock, of which 5,111.86 are outstanding, and 70,000 Series E Shares of which 70,000 are outstanding. Holders of our preferred stock are entitled to vote on an as-converted basis together with holders of our common stock on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. F is not described below.

As of September 28, 2018,July 21, 2023, our executive officers and directors held options covering 396,850619,109 shares of common stock which they had not yet exercised and zero249,875 shares of unvested restricted stock. We had approximately 10,939,011100 shareholders of record of our common stock at September 28, 2018.July 21, 2023. As of September 28, 2018July 21, 2023, we had outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate 3,450,5945,166,111 shares of our common stock at prices ranging from $0.25$0.01 per share to $1.78$4.50 per share, with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.82$0.51 per share. We also will issue the Lenders a total of 1,666,666 additional warrants of October 6, 2023.

 


Common Stock

 

Holders of our common stock are entitled to vote at all elections of directors and to vote or consent on all questions at the rate of one vote for each share. Shareholders may vote cumulatively in the election of directors. Under cumulative voting, every shareholderstockholder entitled to vote may give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of shares held or, the shareholderstockholder may distribute these votes on the same principle among as many candidates as the shareholderstockholder desires. However, at our annual meeting on September 8, 2022, our shareholders approved us changing our state of incorporation from California to Delaware. For reasons unrelated to the Company, we were unable to obtain FINRA’s approval to reincorporate in Delaware.

 

Subject to the rights, privileges, preferences, restrictions and conditions attaching to any other class or series of shares of the Company, holders of common stock have the right to receive any dividends we declare and pay on our common stock. They also have the right to receive our remaining assets and funds upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, if any, after we pay to the holders of any series of preferred stock the amounts they are entitled to, and after we pay all our debts and liabilities.

 

82

Our common stock is subject and subordinate to any rights and preferences granted under our Articles of Incorporation and any rights and preferences which may be granted to any series of preferred stock by our board pursuant to the authority conferred upon our board under theour Articles of Incorporation.

 

Subject to the participation rights of our outstanding preferred stock, our board of directorsBoard may declare dividends on our common stock out of the surplus or net profits as in their discretion may seem proper. During 2014 and 2015, we didWe have not paypaid dividends on our common stock. To date, our policy has been to use our capital toward enhancement of our product position rather than paying dividends on our common stock. As long as the Series F is outstanding, we may not pay dividends to holders of our common stock.

 

The shares of common stock offered by this prospectus and any related prospectus supplementto be issued to AAI stockholders are fully paid and non-assessable and do not have and are not subject to any preemptive or similar rights.

 

Our common stock is traded on the OTCQB market under the symbol “GIGA”.

 

Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

We designated 250,000Our Board is authorized, subject to limitations prescribed by California law, to issue preferred stock in one or more series, to establish from time-to-time the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stockto be included in connection with our adoption of a shareholdereach series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights plan. The shareholder rights plan expired on February 4, 2018 and is no longer in effect. We have not issued any shares of our Series A Preferred stock and the shares remain available for issuance. Shares of Series A Preferred Stock are not be redeemable. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is generally be entitled to a minimum preferential dividend payment of 100 times the dividend declared per share of common stock. In the event of liquidation, the holders of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to a minimum preferentialeach series and any of its qualifications, limitations or restrictions, in each case without further vote or action by our shareholders. Our Board may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with voting, liquidation paymentor conversion rights that could adversely affect the rights of $100.00 per share but will be entitled to an aggregate payment of 100 times the payment made per share of common stock. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock will have 100 votes, voting together with our common stock. Finally, in the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which sharesholders of our common stock are exchanged, each shareor other series of preferred stock.

All of our then outstanding preferred stock (except AAI’s Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive 100 timesF) was redeemed in connection with the amount received perclosing of the Business Combination.

On September 8, 2022, we issued AAI the 514.8 shares of common stock. These rights are protected by customary anti-dilution provisions. Becausestock and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. Prior to the Distribution AAI will convert all of the nature of theits Series A Preferred Stock’s dividend, liquidation and voting rights, the value of the one one-hundredth interest in a share of Series AF Preferred Stock purchasable upon exercise of a right should approximate the value of one shareinto 3,960,043 shares of common stock.

 

Series B Preferred Stock2023 Equity Incentive Plan

 

ThereOn January 26, 2023, the Board approved the Company’s 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”). The 2023 Plan enables the Company to provide stock-based incentives that align the interests of employees, consultants and directors with those of the shareholders of the Company by motivating these persons to achieve long-term results and rewarding them for their achievements; to attract and retain the types of employees, consultants and directors who will contribute to the Company’s long-range success; and to promote the success of the Company’s business.

The following is a summary of the material terms of the 2023 Plan, which is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2023 Plan, a copy of which will be filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Duration of the 2023 Plan

The 2023 Plan became effective upon approval by the Board and will remain in effect until January 26, 2033, unless terminated earlier by the Board.

Plan Administration

The 2023 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) or, in the Board’s sole discretion, by the Board. The Committee will have the authority to, among other things, interpret the 2023 Plan, determine who will be granted awards under the 2023 Plan, determine the terms and conditions of each award, and take action as it determines to be necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2023 Plan.

83

Eligibility

The Committee may grant awards to any employee, consultant or director of the Company and its affiliates. However, only employees are 9,997eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”) as defined by the Internal Revenue Code.

Shares Available for Awards; Limits on Awards

The 2023 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock outstanding. Each share of Series B Preferred Stockthe Company’s common stock. If any outstanding award expires or is convertible at the optioncancelled, forfeited, or terminated without issuance of the holder into 100 shares of our common stock, subject to customary adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar transactions. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $231, which is equal to 105% of the purchase price. If we paid a dividend on our common stock prior to December 31, 2013, we would have been required to pay a dividend on the Series B Preferred Stock equal to 110% and if we pay a dividend on our common stock on or after December 31, 2013, we are required to pay a dividend on the Series B Preferred stock equal to 100% of the cash dividend that would be payable on thefull number of shares of common stock intoto which each sharethe award related, then the shares subject to such award will again become available for future grant under the 2023 Plan.

Types of Series B Preferred Stock is then convertible. The Series B Preferred Stock generally votes together with the common stock, the Series C Preferred Stock, the Series D Preferred Stock and the Series E Shares, on an as-converted basis, on each matter submittedAwards That May Be Granted

Subject to the votelimits in the 2023 Plan, the Committee has the authority to set the size and type of award and any vesting or approvalperformance conditions. The types of awards that may be granted under the holders2023 Plan are: stock options (including both ISOs and non-qualified stock options), restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”).

Stock Options

A stock option is the right to purchase shares of common stock at a future date at a specified price per share called the exercise price. An option may be either an ISO or a non-qualified stock option. Except in the case of options granted pursuant to an assumption or substitution for another option, the exercise price of a stock option may not be less than the fair market value (or in the case of an ISO granted to a 10% stockholder, 110% of the fair market value) of a share of common stock on the grant date.

Stock Appreciation Rights

A stock appreciation right (“SAR”) is the right to receive payment of an amount of cash or shares of common stock having a value equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of exercise of the SAR over the exercise price. The exercise price of a SAR may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date. SARs may be granted alone or in tandem with an option granted under the 2023 Plan. SARs may be settled in cash or in common stock at the discretion of the Committee.

Restricted Stock

A restricted stock award is an award of actual shares of common stock which is subject to certain restrictions on sale for a period of time determined by the Committee. Restricted stock may be held by the Company or in escrow or delivered to the participant pending the release of the restrictions. Participants who receive restricted stock awards generally have the rights and votes as a separate classprivileges of shareholders regarding the shares of restricted stock during the restricted period, including the right to vote and the right to receive dividends, provided that any cash or stock dividends with respect to certain actions that adversely affect the rights ofrestricted stock will be withheld by the Series B Preferred StockCompany for the participant’s account, and on other matters as required by law.


Series C Preferred Stock

There are 3,424.65 shares of our Series C Preferred Stock outstanding. Each share of Series C Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holder into 100 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar transactions. Each share of Series C Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of approximately $146. If we paid a dividend on our common stock prior to January 1, 2014 or if we pay a dividend on our common stock on or after January 1, 2014, we are required to pay a dividendinterest may be credited on the Series C Preferred Stock equal to 110% or 100%, respectively,amount of the cash dividend that woulddividends withheld at a rate and subject to such terms as determined by the Committee. The cash dividends or stock dividends so withheld will be payabledistributed to the participant in cash or, at the discretion of the Committee, in shares of common stock having a fair market value equal to the amount of such dividends upon the release of restrictions on such restricted stock, unless such restricted stock is forfeited.

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

An RSU is an award of hypothetical common stock units having a value equal to the fair market value of an identical number of shares of common stock, into which each sharemay be subject to certain restrictions for a period of Series C Preferred Stocktime determined by the Committee. One feature of an RSU is then convertible. Holdersthat delivery of our Series C Preferred Stock generally votes on an as-converted basis together with holders of ourthe underlying common stock Series B Preferred Stock, Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Shares on each matter submitted to the voteis delayed until vesting or approval of the holdersa later date. No shares of common stock are issued at the time an RSU is granted, and would votethe Company is not required to set aside any funds for the payment of any RSU award. Because no shares are outstanding, the participant does not have any rights as a separate classstockholder. The Committee may grant RSUs with a deferral feature, which defers settlement of the RSU beyond the vesting date until a future payment date or event set out in the participant’s award agreement. The Committee has the discretion to credit RSUs with dividend equivalents.

84

Adjustments Upon Changes in Stock

In the event of changes in the outstanding common stock or in the capital structure of the Company by reason of any stock or extraordinary cash dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, an extraordinary corporate transaction such as any recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, combination, exchange, or other relevant change in capitalization occurring after the grant date of any award, awards granted under the 2023 Plan and any award agreements, the exercise price of options and SARs, the maximum number of shares of common stock subject to all awards and the maximum number of shares of common stock with respect to certain actions that adversely affectwhich any one person may be granted awards during any period will be equitably adjusted or substituted, as to the rightsnumber, price or kind of a share of common stock or other consideration subject to such awards to the extent necessary to preserve the economic intent of the Series C Preferred Stock and on other matters as required by law.award.

 

Series D Preferred StockChange of Control

 

There are 5,111.86 sharesIn the event of our Series D Preferred Stock outstanding. Each sharea change of Series D Preferred Stockcontrol, the vesting of all awards will fully accelerate and all outstanding options and SARs will become immediately exercisable only if the successor corporation refuses to assume or substitute for the outstanding awards. The change of control is convertibledefined as (i) the consummation of the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets in a transaction which requires stockholder approval under applicable state law; or (ii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent) at least 50% of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.

Limitation on Awards

The exercise price of options or SARs granted under the 2023 Plan shall not be less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the optiontime of grant. In the case of ISOs, the exercise price may not be less than 110% of the holder into 100fair market value in the case of 10% shareholders. Options and SARs may not be exercisable for a period of more than 10 years after the date of grant, except that the exercise period of ISOs granted to 10% shareholders is limited to five years. The exercise price may be paid by check or wire transfer or, at the discretion of the Committee, by delivery of shares of our common stock subjecthaving a fair market value equal, determined as provided for in the 2023 Plan or otherwise as approved by the Committee, as of the date of exercise to customarythe cash exercise price, or a combination thereof.

Amendment or Termination of the 2023 Plan

The Board may amend or terminate the 2023 Plan at any time. However, except in the case of adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar transactions. Each share of Series D Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $143.00. If we paid a dividend on ourupon changes in common stock, prior to June 1, 2014, we would have been required to pay a dividend on the Series D Preferred Stock equal to 110% and if we pay a dividend on our common stock on or after June 1, 2014, weno amendment will be required to pay a dividend oneffective unless approved by the Series D Preferred Stock equal to 100%,shareholders of the cash dividend that would be payableCompany to the extent stockholder approval is necessary to satisfy applicable laws or the rules of any stock exchange or quotation system on which the shares of common stock into which each shareare listed or quoted, and the applicable laws of Series D Preferred Stockany foreign country or jurisdiction where Awards are granted under the 2023 Plan. Further, any amendment to the 2023 Plan that impairs the rights of participants who received outstanding grants under the 2023 Plan must be approved by such participants.

Amendment of Awards

The Committee may amend the terms of any one or more awards. However, the Committee may not amend an award that would impair a participant’s rights under the award without the participant’s written consent.

Forfeiture and Recoupment

Each award and the applicable participant’s rights, payments and benefits with respect to an award are subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment upon the occurrence of the participant’s: (i) breach of a duty of confidentiality, (ii) purchasing or selling securities of the Company in violation of the Company’s insider trading guidelines, (iii) competing with the Company, (iv) soliciting Company personnel after employment is then convertible. Holdersterminated, (v) failure to assign any invention or technology to the Company if such assignment is a condition of our Series D Preferred Stock generally vote togetheremployment or any other agreements between the Company and the participant, (vi) being terminated for cause, (vii) violating of the Company’s insider trading policy, or (viii) engaging in other conduct that is disloyal or detrimental to the interests of the Company as determined by the Board.

85

Transfer of Awards

Except for ISOs, all awards are transferable subject to compliance with holdersthe securities laws and the 2023 Plan. ISOs are only transferable by will or by the laws of ourdescent and distribution.

2018 Equity Incentive Plan

As of July 14, 2023, there were 228,464 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and 10,000 shares subject to unvested restricted stock awards. The outstanding stock options have exercise prices ranging from $3.10 to $37.05.

No further awards will be made.

2005 Equity Incentive Plan

As of July 14, we had 58,764 shares of common stock Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stockissuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and no shares subject to unvested restricted stock awards under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The outstanding stock options have exercise prices ranging from $4.05 to $22.95.

No further awards will be made.

Warrants

At July 31, 2023, there were 5,166,111 warrants outstanding at exercised prices ranging from $0.01 to $4.50 per share:

       
Warrants Outstanding No. Outstanding  Exercise Price 
EGE Investors  24,620  $3.75 
Roth Capital  20,980   4.50 
Roth Capital  23,076   3.58 
Laurence Lytton Prefunded Warrants  230,769   0.01 
Placement Agent        
AAI Warrants  2,000,000   0.01 
Warrants  1,200,000   0.86 
Walleye Capital (1)  833,333   0.78 
Arena Investors (1)  833,333   0.78 
         
Total  5,166,111  $0.51 

(1) The exercise prices of these warrants are subject to downward adjustment to 90% of the Series E Shareslowest volume weighted average price for the 10 trading days prior to the date of the exercise. We will issue to each of Walleye Capital and Arena Investors an additional 833,333 warrants on October 6, 2023.

Assumption of Gresham’s Equity Awards

Under the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, we agreed to assume Gresham’s outstanding equity awards representing the right to receive up to 749,626 shares of Giga-tronics common stock on an as-converted basis. These equity awards consist of, on an as-converted basis, on each matter submitted249,875 RSUs and 499,751 stock options exercisable at $2.97 per share held by Gresham’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The RSUs were 50% vested as of the grant date in May 2021 and vest semiannually through May 2024, subject to the voteexecutive officer’s continued employment as of each applicable vesting date. The underlying common stock will be delivered in May 2024 or approvalearlier if an executive officer is no longer employed at which time the vested shares will be delivered. The stock options were 50% vested as of the holdersMay 2021 grant date and vest monthly through the final May 2024 vesting date, subject to the executive officer’s continued employment as of common stock,each applicable vesting date.

86

Anti-Takeover Provisions

Our Charter and votes asBylaws do not contain any provisions which would operate to delay, defer or prevent a separate classchange of control of the Company and that would operate solely with respect to certain actions that adversely affect the rightsan extraordinary corporate transaction such as a merger, reorganization, tender offer or sale of the Series D Preferred Stock and on other matters as required by law.

Series E Preferred Stock

There are 68,340 Series E Shares outstanding, each of which we sold for price of $25.00 per share. Each Series E Share is convertible at the option of the holder into 100 sharesall or substantially all of our common stock, subject to customary adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar transactions. Each Series E Share has a liquidation preference of $37.50. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, a merger, or a saleassets. However, certain provisions of our Microsource DivisionCharter and Bylaws could make it more difficult or our Giga-tronics RADAR/EW business line or their related assets, before any payment or distributiondelay the process necessary to holders of junior shares (including our common stock and our Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock), holders of Series E Shares will be entitled to receive an amount of cash per Series E Share up to the liquidation preference plus all accumulated accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. If a liquidation payment per Series E Share is less than the Series E Shares’ liquidation preference, the liquidation preference will be reduced and the Series E Shares’ redemption priceacquire us by the amount of the payment received. If we pay a dividend on our common stock, we are required to pay a dividend on the Series E Shares equal to 100% of the cash dividend that would be payable on the shares of common stock into which each share of Series E Shares is then convertible.

Holders of Series E Shares generally vote together with the holders of our common stock, the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock on an as-converted basis, on each matter submitted to the vote or approval of the holders of common stock, and votes as a separate class with respect to certain actions that adversely affect the Series E Preferred Stock. In addition, the approval of the holders of the Series E shares is required prior to the Company’s issuance of any securities having rights senior to or in parity with the Series E Shares with respect to dividends or liquidation preferences; provided that we may sell preferred shares ranking on parity with the Series E Shares without such approval if the proceeds are used to repay the Company’s indebtedness to Partners For Growth V, L.P. outstanding as of March 28, 2018 (the date the Series E Shares were first issued), including any interest accrued on such indebtedness, provided further that the liquidation preference of such preferred shares does not exceed the price per preferred share. The Series E Shares’ right to approve parity securities will terminate at such time that (1) fewer than 22,300 Series E Shares, which is 50% of the number of Series E Shares first issued, remain outstanding or (2) the volume weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock for any 20 trading days within any 30 trading day period is $0.75 or more, the average daily trading volume over such 30 trading day period is 100,000 shares or more and there is either an effective registration statement covering resale of the shares common stock that holders of Series E Shares would be entitled to receive upon conversion and any shares received as pay-in-kind dividends, or such shares could be freely sold pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


Holders of Series E Shares are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by our board of directors, cumulative preferential dividends, payable semiannual in cash at a rate per annum equal to 6.0% of the initial purchase price of $25.00 per share, provided that the Company may pay dividends in-kind through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, based on the 10 day volume weighted average price of the common stock.

Remaining Authorized Preferred Stock

The remaining undesignated shares of preferred stock authorized under our Articles of Incorporation are typically referred to as “blank check” preferred stock. This term refers to stock for which the rights and restrictions are determined by the board of directorsmeans of a corporation. Except in limited circumstances,tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise, or to remove incumbent officers and directors. Specifically, the Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorize the Company’s board of directors to issue new shares of common stock or preferred stock without further shareholder action. Our Articles of Incorporation give our board of directors the authority at any time to:following provisions may have anti-takeover effects:

 

 

divide

Our Bylaws contain advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals wherein shareholders seeking to propose a matter for consideration at an annual meeting must deliver detailed notice to us no earlier than the remaining authorized but unissued shares120th calendar day, nor later than the 90th calendar day, prior to the anniversary date of preferred stock into series;

the immediately preceding annual meeting, or if the current year’s meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days of the anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting, such notice must be received no later than 10 calendar days following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made;

 

 

Our Charter authorizes “blank check” preferred stock which may have such rights and preferences, including super voting rights, as the Board may determine, which could be issued to affiliates or other persons whose interests align with incumbent control persons of the designations, number of shares, relative rights, preferences and limitations of any series of preferred stock;

Company;

 

 

increase

If we are able to reincorporate in Delaware, our Delaware Charter provides that lawsuits involving the numberCompany and its internal affairs, including derivative actions brought on behalf of sharesthe Company by its shareholders under state corporate law, be governed by the laws of any preferred series;Delaware and

providing those resulting proceedings be heard exclusively in state courts located within Delaware, which may make actions against or on behalf of the Company more difficult to litigate by shareholders; and

 

 

decrease

Similarly, our proposed Delaware Charter provides that actions brought under the numberSecurities Act or the Securities Exchange Act of shares1934, as amended, be brought exclusively in a preferred series, but notfederal court in Delaware, and that federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over Securities Act litigation relating to a number less than the number of shares outstanding.

Company.

 

The issuance of additional common or preferred stock may be viewed as having adverse effects upon the holders of common stock. Holders of our common stock will not have preemptive rights with respect to any newly issued stock. Our board of directors could adversely affect the voting power of holders of stock in our Company by issuing shares of preferred stock with certain voting, conversion and/or redemption rights. In the event of a proposed merger, tender offer or other attempt to gain control of our Company that the board of directors does not believe to be in the best interests of our shareholders, the board of directors could issue additional preferred stock, which could make any such takeover attempt more difficult to complete. The Company’s board of directors does not intend to issue any preferred stock except on terms that the board deems to be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

 

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, 59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level, New York, NY 10038.

 

USE OF PROCEEDSTRADING AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

 

All securities sold pursuant to this prospectus will be offered and sold byOur common stock is currently quoted on the selling shareholder. We will not receive any ofOTCQB, under the proceeds from such sales. However, we will generate proceeds in the event of a cash exercise of the warrants by the selling shareholders.symbol “GIGA.”

 

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity ofOn July 26, 2023, the sharesclosing price per share of our common stock as reported by the OTCQB was $0.37 per share. Quotes of stock trading prices on any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

As of July 26, 2023, there were an estimated 100 holders of record of our common stock. A total of 2,199,502 shares of common stock are held in street name and are held by additional beneficial owners.

We have never declared or paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings and do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board, subject to applicable laws, and will depend on a number of factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions (including under any future debt financing arrangement we enter into), general business or financial market conditions, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

87

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

No consideration will be paid by AAI’s shareholders for the Distribution Shares to be distributed by AAI in the Distribution. The AAI stockholders will be able to hold the shares or sell them at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices. With respect to the PIPE Securities, each Selling Shareholder will determine at what price(s) such Selling Shareholder may sell the PIPE Securities, and such sales may be made at prevailing market prices, or at privately negotiated prices.

LEGAL MATTERS

Certain legal matters in connection with the validity of the Company’s common stock to be received in the Distribution and offered herebyby the Selling Shareholders will be passed upon for us by Sheppard, Mullin, RichterNason Yeager Gerson Harris & Hampton LLP, San Francisco, California.Fumero, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.

 


EXPERTS

 

The combined consolidated financial statements of Gresham Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and for each of the yearyears in the two-year period ended MarchDecember 31, 20182022, have been audited by Armaninoincluded in this Prospectus and in the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus forms a part in reliance upon the report of Marcum LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as set forthand based in theirpart on the report of Ziv Haft, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given asthe authority of such firmsaid firms as experts in accounting and auditing.

The report of Ziv Haft on the financial statements of Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd., as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, and for each of the yeartwo years in the period ended March 25, 2017December 31, 2022, not included herein, incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and in the Registration Statement have been so includedincorporated in reliance on the report of Crowe LLP,Ziv Haft, a member firm of BDO, an independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated herein by reference given on the authority of said firm as experts in accountingauditing and auditing.accounting.

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC a registration statementRegistration Statement on Form S-1 (including exhibits and schedules) under the Securities Act, with respect to the shares of common stock being offered hereby.by this Prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement,Prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules filed therewith.Registration Statement. For further information about uswith respect to the Company and the common stock offered hereby, we refer youby this Prospectus, reference is made to the registration statement andRegistration Statement, including the exhibits and schedules filed thereto. Statements contained in this prospectus regardingWith respect to each such document filed with the contents of any contract or any other document that is filedSEC as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statementRegistration Statement, reference is qualified in all respects by referencemade to the full text of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. A copyfor a more complete description of the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith may be inspected without charge at the public reference room maintained by the SEC, located at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from such offices upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference room. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website address is www.sec.gov.matter involved.

 

We are subject to the informationfile annual, quarterly and periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance therewith, we will file periodiccurrent reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Our SEC somefilings, including the Registration Statement, of which this Prospectus forms a part, are available to the public at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, including any amendments to those reports, and other information that we file with or furnish to the SEC pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, can also be accessed free of charge in the Investor Relations SEC filings section of our website, which is located at www.https://investor.gigatronics.com/sec-filings. These filings are generally available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Information contained on our website or Gresham’s website are not incorporated by reference into this prospectus. Such periodicProspectus and you should not consider information contained on these websites to be part of this Prospectus. We do not voluntarily deliver physical copies of our SEC reports to security holders, except if and when required by the SEC’s proxy statements and other information will be available for inspection and copying at the public reference room and website of the SEC referred to above. rules in connection with shareholders’ meetings or actions.

 

88

GRESHAM WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Giga-tronics Incorporated

Page

Unaudited Financial Statements as of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and June 24, 2017

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022

F-2

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022

F-3

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022

F-4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022

F-4

F-6

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

F-5

F-7

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Marcum LLP (PCAOB ID Number 688)

F-18

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017

Consolidated Balance Sheets

F-18

Consolidated Statements of Operations

F-19

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity 

F-20

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

F-21

Notes to Financial Statements

F-22

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

- BDO Ziv Haft; Tel-Aviv; (PCAOB ID Number 1185)

F-44

F-19

ReportConsolidated Balance Sheets as of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDecember 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021

F-21
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021F-22
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021F-23
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021F-24
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-25

F-1 

F-45

Table of Contents


 

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(Unaudited)

(In thousands except share data)

(In thousands except share data)

 

June 30,

2018

  

March 31,

2018**

 

Assets

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash-equivalents

 $748  $1,485 

Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $8 and $8, respectively

  458   364 

Inventories, net

  3,438   5,487 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  792   87 

Total current assets

  5,436   7,423 

Property and equipment, net

  760   833 

Other long term assets

  175   175 

Total assets

 $6,371  $8,431 

Liabilities and shareholders' equity

        

Current liabilities:

        

Line of credit

 $552  $552 

Accounts payable

  756   996 

Loan payable, net of discounts and issuance costs

  1,523   1447 

Accrued payroll and benefits

  413   343 

Deferred revenue

  257   3,374 

Deferred rent, net of long term portion

  62   58 

Capital lease obligations

  40   40 

Deferred liability related to asset sale

  51   52 

Other current liabilities

  959   947 

Total current liabilities

  4,613   7,809 

Long term deferred rent

  411   429 

Long term obligations - capital lease

  50   62 

Total liabilities

  5,074   8,300 

Commitments and contingencies

        

Shareholders' equity:

        

Convertible preferred stock no par value Authorized - 1,000,000 shares Series A designated 250,000 shares; no shares at June 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018 issued and outstanding

      

Series B, C, D designated 19,500 shares; 18,533.51 shares at June 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018 issued and outstanding; (liquidation preference of $3,540 at June 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018)

  2,911   2,911 

Series E designated 60,000 shares; 53,400 shares at June 30, 2018 and 43,800 shares at March 31, 2018 issued and outstanding; (liquidation preference of $2,003 at June 30, 2018 and $1,643 at March 31, 2018)

  907   702 

Common stock no par value; Authorized - 40,000,000 shares; 10,418,953 shares at June 30, 2018 and 10,312,653 shares at March 31, 2018 issued and outstanding

  25,272   25,200 

Accumulated deficit

  (27,793)  (28,682)

Total shareholders' equity

  1,297   131 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $6,371  $8,431 
       
  March 31, 2023  December 31, 2022 
ASSETS        
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash and cash equivalents $2,504  $2,195 
Accounts receivable, net  5,396   5,502 
Accrued revenue  2,695   2,479 
Receivable, related party  941   1,242 
Inventories  7,963   7,695 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  726   625 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS  20,225   19,738 
         
Intangible assets, net  3,405   3,476 
Goodwill  8,948   9,054 
Property and equipment, net  2,073   2,240 
Right-of-use assets  3,593   3,940 
Other assets  507   506 
TOTAL ASSETS $38,751  $38,954 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $6,723  $6,913 
Senior secured convertible notes  1,660    
Notes payable  1,715   1,797 
Warrant liabilities  734    
Operating lease liability, current  942   1,067 
Other current liabilities  4,024   4,254 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES  15,798   14,031 
         
LONG TERM LIABILITIES        
Operating lease liability, non-current  2,787   3,014 
Notes payable  282   322 
Senior secured convertible notes, related party  9,442   10,008 
Other liabilities  399   238 
TOTAL LIABILITIES  28,708   27,613 
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Preferred stock; no par value; Authorized - 1,000,000 shares        
Series F Preferred Stock, 520 shares designated; 514.8 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 (liquidation preference of $12,870 at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022) $4,990  $4,990 
Common Stock; no par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 5,931,582 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2023; 13,333,333 shares authorized, 5,931,582 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022  36,106   35,141 
Accumulated deficit  (30,190)  (27,726)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (1,592)  (1,779)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY  9,314   10,626 
         
Non-controlling interest  729   715 
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY  10,043   11,341 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $38,751  $38,954 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

F-2

 

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsGIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

As the Company adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) as of April 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, there is a lack of comparability to the prior periods presented. See Note 1.

** Derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands except per share data)

  

Three Months Ended

 

(In thousands except per share data)

 

June 30,

2018

 

  

June 24,

2017

 

 

Revenue

        

Goods

 $207  $316 

Services

  2,843   1,675 

Total revenue

  3,050   1,991 
         

Cost of goods and services

  1,744   1,525 

Gross margin

  1,306   466 
         

Operating expenses:

        

Engineering

  375   452 

Selling, general and administrative

  1,001   1,171 

Total operating expenses

  1,376   1,623 
         

Operating loss

  (70)  (1,157)
         

Interest expense:

        

Interest expense, net

  (127)  (79)

Interest expense from accretion of loan discount

  (50)  (22)

Total interest expense, net

  (177)  (101)

Loss before income taxes

  (247)  (1,258)

Provision for income taxes

  40    

Net loss

 $(287) $(1,258)
         

Loss per common share - basic

 $(0.03) $(0.13)

Loss per common share - diluted

 $(0.03) $(0.13)
         

Weighted average common shares used in per share calculation:

        

Basic

  10,419   9,715 

Diluted

  10,419   9,715 

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

         
  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2023  2022 
Revenues $8,723  $7,244 
Cost of revenues  6,560   4,751 
Gross profit  2,163   2,493 
Operating expenses        
General and administrative  4,688   2,197 
Research and development  723   489 
Selling and marketing  543   298 
Total operating expenses  5,954   2,984 
Loss from continuing operations  (3,791)  (491)
Other (expense) income        
Interest expense, related party     (12)
Interest expense  (213)  (67)
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes, related party  566    
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes and warrant liabilities  939    
Foreign currency exchange adjustment  44    
Other income (expense)  (2)  60 
Total other (expense) income, net  1,334   (19)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (2,457)  (510)
Income tax benefit (provision)  7    
Net loss  (2,450)  (510)
Net loss (gain) attributable to non-controlling interest  (14)  13 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(2,464) $(497)
         
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted $(0.42) $(0.17)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted  5,932   2,920 
         
Comprehensive loss        
Loss available to common stockholders $(2,464) $(497)
Foreign currency translation adjustments  187   (391)
Total comprehensive loss $(2,277) $(888)

 

As the Company adopted the requirementsThe accompanying notes are an integral part of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statementsASC 606) as of April 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, there is a lack of comparability to the prior periods presented. See Note 1.

 

F-3

Table of Contents

 

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERSEQUITY

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2023

(In thousands except share data)

                                 
  Preferred
Stock
  Common Stock                 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Non-
Controlling
Interest
  Total
Stockholder's
Equity
 
Balance at January 1, 2023  515  $4,990   5,931,582  $35,141  $(27,726) $(1,779) $715  $11,341 
Stock-based compensation           106            106 
Warrant issued with notes payable           859            859 
Net loss              (2,464)        (2,464)
Foreign currency translation adjustments                 187      187 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest                    14   14 
Balance at March 31, 2023  515  $4,990   5,931,582  $36,106  $(30,190) $(1,592) $729  $10,043 

F-4

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERSEQUITY

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2022

(In thousands except share data)

  Preferred Stock  Common Stock                 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Non-
Controlling
Interest
  Total
Stockholder's
Equity
 
Balance at January 1, 2022  515  $4,990   2,920,085  $26,682  $(9,988) $(240) $1,056  $22,500 
Stock-based compensation           41            41 
Capital contribution from parent           517            517 
Net loss              (497)        (497)
Foreign currency translation adjustments                 (391)     (391)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest                    (13)  (13)
Balance at March 31, 2022  515  $4,990   2,920,085  $27,240  $(10,485) $(631) $1,043  $22,157 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

F-5

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

  

Three Months Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

June 30,

2018

 

  

June 24,

2017

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net loss

 $(287) $(1,258)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

        

Depreciation and amortization

  73   247 

Stock based compensation

  57   46 

Estimated equity forward

     46 

Accretion of discounts on debt

  50   22 

Accrued interest and fees on loan payable

  25    

Change in deferred rent

  (14)  451 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Trade accounts receivable

  (94)  206 

Inventories

  468   (178)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  (516)  75 

Accounts payable

  (240)  (441)

Accrued payroll and benefits

  70   (156)

Deferred revenue

  (550)  (167)

Other current liabilities

  12    

Net cash used in operating activities

  (945)  (1,107)
         

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Purchases of property and equipment

     (620)

Net cash used in investing activities

     (620)
         

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Principal payments on capital leases

  (12)  (13)

Proceeds from borrowings, net of issuance costs

     1,456 

Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs

  205    

Exercise of warrants

  15    

Net cash provided by financing activities

  208   1,443 
         

Decrease in cash and cash-equivalents

  (737)  (284)
         

Beginning cash and cash-equivalents

  1,485   1,421 

Ending cash and cash-equivalents

 $748  $1,137 
         

Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:

        

Cash paid for income taxes

 $  $ 

Cash paid for interest

 $61  $39 
         

Supplementary disclosure of noncash activities:

        

Cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 606 on inventory

 $(1,581)   

Cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 606 on prepaid expenses and other current assets

 $189    

Cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 606 on deferred revenue

 $2,567    

Common stock issued in connection with debt issuance

 $  $156 

Fully depreciated equipment disposal

 $  $377 
         
  For the Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022 
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(2,450) $(510)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation  181   142 
Amortization  73   80 
Amortization of right-of-use assets  299   31 
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes, related party  (566)   
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes  (143)   
Change in fair value of warrants issued with senior secured convertible notes  (796)   
Increase in capital contribution from parent for corporate overhead     340 
Stock-based compensation  106   41 
Compensation warrant issued in connection with senior secured convertible notes  858    
Offering costs in connection with senior secured convertible notes  653    
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  58   (348)
Accrued revenue  (274)  (326)
Inventories  (235)  (475)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (98)  222 
Other assets     (409)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (40)  1,531 
Accounts payable, related parties      (53)
Other current liabilities  (211)  (657)
Other non-current liabilities  154    
Lease liabilities  (305)  (33)
Net cash used in operating activities  (2,736)  (424)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (27)  (129)
Net cash used in investing activities  (27)  (129)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Capital contribution from parent     177 
Proceeds from accounts receivables, related party  301    
Proceeds from senior secured convertible notes, net of issuance costs  2,680    
Proceeds from notes payable     294 
Payments on notes payable  (77)   
Payments on revolving credit facilities, net     (1)
Net cash provided by financing activities  2,904   470 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  168   (619)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  309   (702)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  2,195   1,599 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $2,504  $897 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid during the period for interest $213  $49 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

F-6

 

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

As the Company adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) as of April 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, there is a lack of comparability to the prior periods presented. See Note 1.


NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)          Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Note 1. Description of Business

Giga-tronics Incorporated (“Giga-tronics” orGIGA”) through its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), pursuant todesigns, manufactures and distributes specialized electronics equipment, automated test solutions, power electronics, supply and distribution solutions, as well as radio, microwave and millimeter wave communication systems and components for a variety of applications with a focus on the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The consolidated results of operationsglobal defense industry. GIGA also offers bespoke technology solutions for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the fiscal year. In the opinion of management, the information contained herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring entries) necessary to make the consolidated results of operations for the interim periods a fair statement of such operations. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto, includedmission critical applications in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securitiesmedical, industrial, transportation and Exchange Commission for the year ended March 31, 2018.telecommunications markets.

 

Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Giga-tronics and its wholly-owned subsidiary,GIGA has two subsidiaries Microsource Inc. (“Microsource”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation

Derivatives The Company accounts for certain of its warrants and embedded debt features as derivatives. Changes in fair values are reported in earnings as gain or loss on adjustment of these instruments to fair value. 

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue Beginning April 1, 2018, the Company follows the provisions of ASU 2014-09 as subsequently amended by the FASB between 2015 and 2017 and collectivelyGresham Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with CustomersGresham Worldwide, Inc.) (“ASC 606”GWW”). Amounts for prior periods are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the Company’s historic accounting practices. The guidance providesGIGA manages its acquired operations through its wholly owned subsidiary GWW. GIGA is a unified model to determine how revenue is recognized. In addition, the standard requires disclosuremajority owned subsidiary of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under its agreements, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identifies the promised goodsAAI Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“AAI” or services in the contract; (ii) determines whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measures the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations based on estimated selling prices; and (v) recognizes revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation.

The Company generates revenue through the design, manufacture, and sale of products used in defense industry to major prime defense contractors, the armed services (primarily in the U.S.“Parent”) and research institutes. There is generallycurrently operates as an operating segment of AAI. GWW has three wholly-owned subsidiaries, Gresham Power Electronics Ltd. (“Gresham Power”), Relec Electronics Ltd. (“Relec”), and Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd. (“Enertec”), and one performance obligationmajority owned subsidiary, Microphase Corporation (“Microphase”). GIGA manufactures specialized electronic equipment for use in the Company’s contracts with its customers. For highly engineered products, the customer typically controls the work in process as evidenced either by contractual termination clauses or by the Company’s right to payment for costs incurred to date plus a reasonable profit for products or services that do not have an alternative use. In these circumstances, the performance obligation is the designmilitary test and manufacturing service. As control transfers continuously over time on these contracts, revenue is recognized based on the extentairborne operational applications. Our operations consist of progress towards completion of the performance obligation using a cost-to-cost method. Engineering services are also satisfied over time and recognized on the cost-to-cost method. These types of revenue arrangements are typical for our defense contracts within the Microsource segment for its YIG RADAR filter products used in fighter jet aircrafts.

For the sale of standard or minimally customized products, the performance obligation is the series of finished products which are recognized at the points in time the units are transferred to the control of the customer, typically upon shipment. This type of revenue arrangement is typical for our commercial contracts within the Giga-tronics segment for its Advanced Signal Generation and Analysis system products used for testing RADAR and Electronic Warfare (“EW”) equipment.

Performance Obligations

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of account in ASC Topic 606. The Company’s performance obligations include:three business segments:

 

·

DesignRadio Frequency (”RF”) Solutions (”RF Solutions”) – consists of Microphase which is located in Connecticut. Microphase designs and manufacturing services

Product supply – Distinct goods or services that are substantially the same

Engineering services

manufactures custom microwave products for military applications and generates revenue primarily through sole-source production contracts for custom engineered components and RADAR filters.

 


·Power Electronics & Displays - consists of two subsidiaries, namely Gresham Power and Relec located in the United Kingdom which primarily produce power conversion systems.

·Precision Electronic Solutions – consists of one subsidiary and one division, namely Enertec located in Israel and the Giga-tronics Division including Microsource located in California and New Hampshire, primarily producing test systems and RF filters for the defense industries.

 

The majority of the Company’s contracts have a single performance obligation as the promise to transfer the individual goods or services is not separately identifiable from other promises in the contractsNote 2. Liquidity and therefore, not distinct. The Company’s revenue in fiscal 2019 under ASC 606 primarily relates to design and manufacturing services, there was no product supply, and engineering services were $56,000.

Transaction Price

The Company has both fixed and variable consideration. Under the Company’s highly engineered design and manufacturing arrangements, advance payments and unit prices are considered fixed, as product is not returnable and the Company has an enforceable right to reimbursement in the event of a cancellation. For standard and minimally customized products, payments can include variable consideration, such as product returns and sales allowances. The transaction price in engineering services arrangements may include estimated amounts of variable consideration, including award fees, incentive fees, or other provisions that can either increase or decrease the transaction price. Milestone payments are identified as variable consideration when determining the transaction price. At the inception of each arrangement that includes milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being achieved and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. The Company estimates variable consideration at the amount to which they expect to be entitled, and determines whether to include estimated amounts as a reduction in the transaction price based largely on an assessment of the conditions that might trigger an adjustment to the transaction price and all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available to the Company. The Company includes estimated amounts in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the estimation uncertainty is resolved.

Allocation of Consideration

As part of the accounting for arrangements that contain multiple performance obligations, the Company must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the stand-alone selling price of each performance obligation identified in the contract. When a contract contains more than one performance obligation, the Company uses key assumptions to determine the stand-alone selling price of each performance obligation. Because of the customized nature of products and services, estimated stand-alone selling prices for most performance obligations are estimated using a cost-plus margin approach. For non-customized products, list prices generally represent the standalone selling price. The Company allocates the total transaction price to each performance obligation based on the estimated relative stand-alone selling prices of the promised goods or service underlying each performance obligation.

Timing of Recognition

Significant management judgment is required to determine the level of effort required under an arrangement and the period over which the Company expects to complete its performance obligations under the arrangement. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and is based on the nature of the products or services to be provided. The Company generally uses the cost-to-cost measure of progress as this measure best depicts the transfer of control to the customer which occurs as we incur costs on our contracts. Under the cost-to-cost method, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion of the performance obligation. Revenue is recognized for design and manufacturing services and for engineering services over time proportionate to the costs that the Company has incurred to perform the services using the cost-to-cost input method and for products at a point in time. Approximately 99% of the Company’s revenue is recognized over time, with the remaining 1% recognized at a point in time.

Changes in Estimates

The effect of a contract modification on the transaction price and the measure of progress for the performance obligation to which it relates, is recognized as an adjustment to revenue (either as an increase in or a reduction of revenue) on a cumulative catch-up basis.

For contracts using the cost-to-cost method, management reviews the progress and execution of the performance obligations. This process requires management judgment relative to estimating contract revenue and cost, and making assumptions for delivery schedule. This process requires management’s judgment to make reasonably dependable cost estimates. Since certain contracts extend over a longer period of time, the impact of revisions in cost and revenue estimates during the progress of work may adjust the current period earnings through a cumulative catch-up basis. This method recognizes, in the current period, the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior quarters. Contract cost and revenue estimates for significant contracts are generally reviewed and reassessed quarterly. Revenue recognized over time using the cost-to-cost method represented approximately 99% of revenue for the first quarter of 2019.

The aggregate effects of these changes on contracts in the first quarter of 2019 was nominal.


Balance Sheet Presentation

The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections results in billed accounts receivable, unbilled receivables (contract assets), and deferred revenue (contract liabilities) on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Under the typical payment terms of over time contracts, the customer pays either performance-based payments or progress payments. Amounts billed and due from customers are classified as receivables on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Interim payments may be made as work progresses, and for some contracts, an advance payment may be made. A liability is recognized for these interim and advance payments in excess of revenue recognized and is presented as a contract liability which is included within accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Contract liabilities typically are not considered a significant financing component because these cash advances are used to meet working capital demands that can be higher in the early stages of a contract. When revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer, an unbilled receivable (contract asset) is recorded for the amount the Company is entitled to receive based on its enforceable right to payment.

Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of firm orders for which work has not been performed as of the period end date and excludes unexercised contract options and potential orders under ordering-type contracts (e.g., indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity).

Recognition Prior to April 1, 2018

Prior to April 1, 2018 under the legacy GAAP, the Company recorded revenue when there was persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery had occurred, the price was fixed and determinable, and collectability was reasonably assured. This occurred when products were shipped or the customer accepted title transfer. If the arrangement involved acceptance terms, the Company deferred revenue until product acceptance was received. On certain large development contracts, revenue was recognized upon achievement of substantive milestones.  Advanced payments were recorded as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria described above had been met. Amounts for periods ending prior to April 1, 2018 have not been adjusted for ASC 606 and continue to be reported in accordance with the Company’s previous accounting practices.

New Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires that lessees recognize assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations for leases with a lease term of more than one year. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 (“ASC 606”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In August 2015 and March, April, May and December 2016, the FASB issued additional amendments to the new revenue guidance relating to reporting revenue on a gross versus net basis, identifying performance obligations, licensing arrangements, collectability, noncash consideration, presentation of sales tax, transition, and clarifying examples. Collectively these are referred to as ASC Topic 606, which replaces all legacy GAAP guidance on revenue recognition and eliminates all industry-specific guidance. ASC 606 establishes a broad principle that would require an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this principle, an entity identifies the contract with a customer, identifies the separate performance obligations in the contract, determines the transaction price, allocates the transaction price to the separate performance obligations and recognizes revenue when each separate performance obligation is satisfied. ASU ASC 606 was further updated to provide clarification on a number of specific issues as well as requiring additional disclosures. ASC 606 may be applied either retrospectively or through the use of a modified-retrospective method. The full retrospective method requires companies to recast each prior reporting period presented as if the new guidance had always existed. Under the modified retrospective method, companies would recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard as an adjustment to opening retained earnings at the date of initial application. ASC 606 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2017.

The Company adopted ASC 606 on April 1, 2018 (beginning of the Company’s fiscal year) using the modified retrospective method. Under this approach, no restatement of fiscal years 2017 or 2018 was required. Rather, the effect of the adoption was recorded as a cumulative adjustment decreasing the opening balance of accumulated deficit at April 1, 2018.

The most significant change relates to the timing of revenue and cost recognition on the Company’s customer contracts. Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized as the customer obtains control of the goods and services promised in the contract. Given the nature of the Company’s products and terms and conditions in the contracts, the customer typically obtains control as the Company performs work under such contract. Therefore, the Company expects to recognize revenue over time for substantially all of its contracts using the percentage-of-completion cost-to-cost method. As a result, the Company now recognizes revenue for these contracts as it incurs costs, as opposed to when units are delivered. This change has generally resulted in earlier revenue recognition in the performance period as compared to the legacy method for those contracts, giving rise to a decrease to the Company’s opening balance of accumulated deficit as of April 1, 2018.


Adopting ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, involves significant new estimates and judgments such as estimating stand-alone selling prices, variable consideration, and total costs to complete the contract. All of the estimates are subject to change during the performance of the contract which may cause more variability due to significant estimates involved in the new accounting.

The cumulative effect of the changes made to the Company’s consolidated April 1, 2018 balance sheet for the adoption of Topic 606 were as follows (in thousands):

  

Balance at

March 31, 2018

  

Topic ASC 606

Adjustments

  

Balance at

April 1, 2018

 

Assets

            

Prepaid and other current assets

 $87  $188  $275 

Inventories, net

  5,487   (1,581)  3,906 

Liabilities

            

Deferred revenue

 $3,374  $(2,568) $806 

Stockholders' Equity

            

Accumulated deficit

 $(28,682) $1,176  $(27,506)

In accordance with the requirements of Topic 606, the disclosure of the impact of adoption on our condensed consolidated income statement and balance sheet for the first quarter ended June 30, 2018 was as follows (in thousands except for net loss per share):

For the first quarter ended June 30, 2018

 

Without ASC

606 Adoption

  

Topic ASC 606

Adjustments

  

As Reported

 

Assets

            
             

Prepaid and other current assets

 $149  $643  $792 

Inventories, net

  5,406   (1,968)  3,438 

Liabilities

            

Deferred revenue

 $2,966  $(2,709)  257 

Stockholders' Equity

            

Accumulated deficit

 $(29,177) $1,384   (27,793)

Revenue

            

Revenue

 $2,247  $596  $2,843 

Costs of services

            

Costs of services

 $416  $358   774 

Net loss

 $(525) $(238)  (287)

Net loss per share, basic and fully diluted

 $(0.05) $0.02  $(0.03)

(2)          Going Concern and Management’s PlanFinancial Condition

The Company incurred net losses of $287,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and $3.1 million in fiscal year 2018. These losses have contributed to an accumulated deficit of $27.8 million as of June 30, 2018. The Company used cash flow in operations totaling $945,000 and $1.1 million in the first quarters of fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company has also experienced delays in the development of features, receipt of orders, and shipments for our new EW test system products. These delays have significantly contributed to our continued losses, liquidity concerns and accumulated deficits.

Our EW test system products have shipped to several customers, but potential delays in the refinement of features, longer than anticipated sales cycles, or the ability to efficiently manufacture our EW test system products, could significantly contribute to additional future losses and decreases in working capital.

To help fund operations, the Company relies on advances under the line of credit with Bridge Bank which expires on May 6, 2019. The agreement includes a subjective acceleration clause, which allows for amounts due under the facility to become immediately due in the event of a material adverse change in the Company’s business condition (financial or otherwise), operations, properties or prospects, or ability to repay the credit based on the lender’s judgement. As of June 30, 2018, the line of credit had an outstanding balance of $582,000, and additional borrowing capacity of $143,000.


In April 2017, we entered into a $1.5 million loan agreement with Partners For Growth, V L.P. (“PFG”) to provide additional cash to fund our operations. As a result of experiencing continued delays in receiving EW test system product orders in fiscal 2018, we were unable to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants required by the PFG loan and, as a result, were subject to a default interest rate between June 2017 and March 2018. On March 26, 2018, and concurrent with the execution of certain stock purchase agreements for the sale of new Series E Convertible Preferred Stock and conditional upon the sale of at least $1.0 million in gross proceeds thereof, the Company and PFG entered into a modification agreement which provided for the restructuring of certain terms of the PFG loan including resetting of the financial covenants for the remaining loan term (see Note 6, Term Loans, Revolving Line of Credit and Warrants).

In order to raise additional working capital and to restructure the PFG loan, on March 26, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of 43,800 shares of a newly designated series of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series E Shares”) to approximately 15 private investors. The purchase price for each Series E Share was $25.00. Gross proceeds received by the Company were approximately $1.095 million (the “Placement”). Net proceeds to the Company after fees and expenses of the placement agent were approximately $1.0 million. Each Series E Share is initially convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at the conversion price of $0.25 per share, which is equivalent to 100 shares of the Company’s common stock for each Series E Share (see Note 13, Preferred Stock and Warrants – Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock).

To assist with the upfront purchases of inventory required for future product deliveries, the Company entered into advance payment arrangements with certain customers, whereby the customers reimburse the Company for raw material purchases prior to the shipment of the finished products. The Company will continue to seek similar terms in future agreements with these customers and other customers.

Management will continue to review all aspects of its business including, but not limited to, the contribution of its individual business segments, in an effort to improve cash flow and reduce costs and expenses, while continuing to invest, to the extent possible, in new product development for future revenue streams.

Management will also continue to seek additional working capital and liquidity through debt (including debt refinancing), equity financing or possible product line sales or cessation of unprofitable business product lines, however there are no assurances that such financings or product line sales will be available at all, or on terms acceptable to the Company.

Our historical operating results and forecasting uncertainties indicate that substantial doubt exists related to our ability to continue as a going concern. Management believes that through the actions to date and possible future actions described above, we should have the necessary liquidity to continue operations at least twelve months from the issuance of the financial statements. However, we cannot predict, with certainty, the outcome of our actions to maintain or generate additional liquidity, including the availability of additional financing, or whether such actions would generate the expected liquidity as currently planned. Forecasting uncertainties also exist with respect to our EW test system product line due to the potential longer than anticipated sales cycles, as well as with potential delays in the refinement of certain features or requisition of certain components and/or our ability to efficiently manufacture it in a timely manner.

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concernconcern. The Company has incurred recurring net losses and operations have not provided cash flows. In view of these matters, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely through the sale of equity securities with some additional funding from other sources, including term notes until such time as funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might result ifbe necessary should the Company werebe unable to do so.continue as a going concern.

 

Our primary sources of liquidity have historically been funded by our parent company, AAI. The extent of continued support from AAI is not assured as we seek additional financing from third parties. There is substantial doubt that we will have sufficient cash to meet our needs over the next 12 months. Our ability to obtain additional financing is subject to several factors, including market and economic conditions, our performance and investor and lender sentiment with respect to us and our industry. If we are unable to raise additional financing in the near term as needed, our operations and production plans may be scaled back or curtailed and our operations and growth would be impeded.

Our near term fixed commitments for cash expenditures are primarily for payments for employee salaries, operating leases, accounts payables, and inventory purchase commitments.

(3)         Revenue RecognitionNote 3. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

 

The following table presents changesaccompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X and do not include all the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (”US”), (“GAAP”). The Company has made estimates and judgments affecting the amounts reported in the Company’s contract assetsunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and liabilitiesthe accompanying notes. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially from the Company’s estimates. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial information is unaudited but reflects all normal adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to provide a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Annual Report”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 11, 2023. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2022 included in this report was derived from the Company’s audited 2022 financial statements contained in the above referenced 2022 Annual Report. Results of the three months ended June 30, 2018.

  

Balance at

Beginning

of the Period

  

Additions

  

Deductions

  

Balance at

the end

of the Period

 
  

(in thousands)

 

Contract Assets

 $189  $466  $12  $643 

Contract Liabilities: Deferred Revenue

 $(806) $(248) $787  $257 

During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recognized the following revenues (in thousands).

Revenue recognized in the period from:

    

Amounts included in contract liabilities at the beginning of the period:

    

Performance obligations satisfied

 $559 

New activities in the period:

    

Changes in estimates

  (29)

Performance obligations satisfied

  2,313 

Total services revenue

 $2,843 


As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate amountMarch 31, 2023, are not necessarily indicative of the transaction price allocatedresults to remaining performance obligations was $257,000, whichbe expected for the Company expects to recognize into revenue within the next twelve months.full year ending December 31, 2023.

 

(4)          Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

(In thousands)

 

June 30,

2018

  

March 31,

2018

 

Raw materials

 $1,147  $2,290 

Work-in-progress

  1,749   2,100 

Finished goods

  81   561 

Demonstration inventory

  461   536 

Total

 $3,438  $5,487 

(5)      Accounts Receivable Line of Credit

On June 1, 2015 the Company entered into a $2.5 million Revolving Accounts Receivable Line of Credit agreement with Bridge Bank. The agreement provides for a maximum borrowing capacity of $2.5 million of which $2.0 million is subject to a borrowing base calculation and $500,000 is non-formula based. On May 23, 2017, the Company renewed this credit line (which expired on May 7, 2017) through May 6, 2019.

The loan agreement is secured by all assets of the Company including intellectual property and general intangibles and provides for a borrowing capacity equal to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. The loan matures on May 6, 2019 and bears an interest rate, equal to 1.5% over the bank’s prime rate of interest. Interest is payable monthly with principal due upon maturity. The Company paid an annual commitment fee of $12,500 in May 2017. The loan agreement contains financial and non-financial covenants that are customary for this type of lending and includes a covenant to maintain an asset coverage ratio of at least 150% (defined as unrestricted cash and cash equivalents maintained with Bridge Bank, plus eligible accounts receivable aged less than 90 days from the invoice date, divided by the total amount of outstanding principal of all obligations under the loan agreement).

As of June 30, 2018, the Company was in compliance with all the financial covenants under the agreement. The line of credit requires a lockbox arrangement, which provides for receipts to be swept daily to reduce borrowings outstanding at the discretion of Bridge Bank. This arrangement, combined with the existence of the subjective acceleration clause in the line of credit agreement, necessitates the line of credit be classified as a current liability on the balance sheet. The acceleration clause allows for amounts due under the facility to become immediately due in the event of a material adverse change in the Company’s business condition (financial or otherwise), operations, properties or prospects, or ability to repay the credit based on the lender's judgment. As of June 30, 2018, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $552,000 under the line of credit.

(6)       Term Loans, Revolving Line of Credit and Warrants

On April 27, 2017, the Company entered into a $1,500,000 loan agreement with Partners For Growth V, L.P. (“PFG”), which was funded by PFG on April 28, 2017 (the “2017 Loan”). The 2017 Loan, which matures on April 27, 2019, provides for interest only payments during the term of the loan with principal and any accrued interest and fees due upon maturity. The 2017 Loan bears interest at a fixed aggregate per annum rate equal to 16% per annum, of which 9.5% per annum rate is payable monthly in cash and 6.5% per annum rate is accrued monthly and due upon maturity. In addition, the Company agreed to pay PFG a cash fee of up to $100,000 payable upon maturity (the “back-end fee”), $76,000 of which was earned on April 27, 2017, and $24,000 of which is earned at the rate of $1,000 per month on the first day of each month if the loan principal (or any amount thereof) is outstanding during any day of the prior month.

Additionally, the 2017 Loan provides for the Company’s issuance of up to 250,000 common shares to PFG, of which 190,000 was eaned by PFG upon signing (April 27, 2017) and 60,000 of which is earned at the rate of 2,500 per month on the first day of each month if the loan principal (or any amount thereof) is outstanding during any day of the prior month. The 2017 Loan provided for certain financial covenants related to the revenue achievement and maintenance of tangible net worth. PFG can accelerate the maturity of the loan in case of a default and the Company can prepay the loan before maturity without interest prepayments or penalty. The Company has pledged all of its assets as collateral for the 2017 Loan, including all its accounts, inventory, equipment, deposit accounts, intellectual property and all other personal property. The 2017 Loan is subordinate to the Bridge Bank line of credit (see Note 5, Accounts Receivable Line of Credit).


The requirement to issue 60,000 shares of the Company’s common stock over the term of the loan is an embedded derivative (an embedded equity forward). The Company evaluated the embedded derivative in accordance with ASC 815-15-25. The embedded derivative is not clearly and closely related to the debt host instrument and therefore is being separately measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value being recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.

The proceeds received upon issuing the loan were allocated to: i) common stock, for the fair value of the 190,000 shares of common stock initially issued to the lender; ii) the fair value of the embedded derivative; and iii) the loan host instrument. Upon issuance of the loan, the Company recognized $1,576,000 of principal payable to PFG, representing the stated principal balance of $1,500,000 plus the initial back-end fee of $76,000. The initial carrying value of the loan was recognized net of debt discount aggregating approximately $326,000, which is comprised of the following:

Fees paid to the lender and third parties $44,000 
Back-end fee  76,000 
Estimated fair value of embedded equity forward  49,000 
Fair value of 190,000 shares of common stock issued to lender  157,000 
Aggregate discount amount $326,000 

The bifurcated embedded derivative and the debt discount are presented net with the related loan balance in the consolidated balance sheets. The debt discount is being amortized to interest expense over the loan’s term using the effective interest method. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, the Company amortized discounts of approximately $127,000 to interest expense. As of June 30, 2018, the Company had issued to PFG 375,000 common shares under the loans.

PFG’s ability to call the debt on default (contingent put) and its ability to assess interest rate at a default rate (contingent interest) are embedded derivatives, which the Company evaluated. The fair value of these embedded features was determined to be immaterial and was not bifurcated from the debt host for accounting purposes.

Between June 24, 2017 and March 25, 2018, the Company was not in compliance with the loan’s revenue and tangible net worth financial covenants and was subject to a default interest rate of 22% per annum which it accrued and paid when due during this period.

On March 26, 2018, concurrent with the execution of the Securities Purchase Agreement for the Series E Shares (see Note 13 – Preferred Stock and Warrants - Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock), the Company and PFG entered into a modification agreement providing for the restructuring of certain terms associated with approximately $1.7 million in indebtedness under the 2017 Loan. Subject to the sale of at least $1.0 million in Series E Shares, PFG agreed to waive all current defaults and cease applying the applicable default interest rate, returning to the stated non-default rate of 16%, and to lower the revenue and tangible net worth covenants for the remaining term of the loan. As consideration for the modifications, the Company reduced the exercise price of outstanding warrants previously granted to PFG pursuant to the 2014 Loan Agreement and Credit Line to purchase 260,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from $1.42 to $0.25 per share and extended the exercisability of the warrants by one year to March 13, 2020.

The amendments to the 2017 Loan were recognized as a loan modification. The change in fair value of the warrants of $43,700, resulting from the reduced strike price and extension of term, was recognized as a discount to the 2017 Loan and is being amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the 2017 Loan.

The Company anticipates it will need to seek additional funds through the issuance of new debt, equity securities or product line sales in order to repay the 2017 Loan (including accrued interest and back end fees) in full upon maturity or otherwise enter into a refinancing agreement with PFG. However, there can be no assurances that such financings, re-financing or product line sales will be available at all, or on terms acceptable to the Company.

(7)Fair Value

Pursuant to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and its subsequent updates, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The accounting guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring the use of observable market data when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on active market data. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances.  


The fair value hierarchy is broken down into the three input levels summarized below:

•  

Level 1  —Valuations are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and readily accessible by us at the reporting date. Examples of assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs are certain money market funds, U.S. Treasuries and trading securities with quoted prices on active markets.

•  

Level 2  —Valuations based on inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly in active markets. Examples of assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs are U.S. government agency bonds, corporate bonds, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and over-the- counter derivatives.

•  

Level 3  —Valuations based on unobservable inputs in which there are little or no market data, which require us to develop our own assumptions.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash and cash-equivalents and line of credit approximate their fair values at each balance sheet date due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments, and generally result in inputs categorized as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value of the outstanding PFG loan approximates the estimated aggregate fair value and classified with the loan host. The fair value estimate of the embedded equity forward is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the measurement date, the risk-free rate, the date of expiration, and any expected cash distributions of the underlying asset before expiration. The estimated fair value of the embedded equity forward represents a Level 2 measurement.

On March 26, 2018, the Company and PFG agreed to eliminate the cash put provision contained in warrants in exchange for the Company issuing 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon removal of the put, the warrants were re-valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) remaining term of 0.96 years, (ii) expected volatility of 85%, (iii) risk-free interest rate of 2.12%, and (iv) no expected dividends. The resulting change in fair value of the warrants, along with the fair value of the common stock issued to PFG, was recognized as an adjustment of warrant liability in the consolidated statements of operations.

There were no assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and there were no assets or liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018.

(8)         Loss Per Share

Basic loss per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the net incremental shares that would be issued if unvested restricted shares became vested and dilutive outstanding stock options were exercised, using the treasury stock method. In the case of a net loss, it is assumed that no incremental shares would be issued because they would be antidilutive. In addition, certain options are considered antidilutive because assumed proceeds from exercise price, related tax benefits and average future compensation was greater than the weighted average number of options outstanding multiplied by the average market price during the period. Shares excluded from the diluted EPS calculation because they would be anti-dilutive are as follows:

  

Three Months Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

June 30,

2018

  

June 24,

2017

 
(in thousands):        

Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options

  1,498   1,104 

Restricted stock awards

  262   350 

Issuable shares for interest on loan

  25   60 

Common shares issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred stock

  7,113   1,853 

Common shares issuable upon exercise of warrants

  3,960   3,737 

The stock options, restricted stock, convertible preferred stocks and warrants not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share (EPS) for the three month period ended June 30, 2018 and June 24, 2017 is a result of the Company’s net loss and, therefore, the effect of these instruments would be anti-dilutive.


(9)          Stock Based Compensation

The Company has established the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, which provide for the granting of options and restricted stock for up to 2,850,000 shares of common stock at 100% of fair market value at the date of grant, with each grant requiring approval by the Board of Directors of the Company. The 2005 Plan has been extended to be effective until 2025. Option grants under the 2000 Stock Option Plan are no longer available. Options granted generally vest in one or more installments in a four or five year period and must be exercised while the grantee is employed by the Company or within a certain period after termination of employment or service arrangement. Options granted to employees shall not have terms in excess of 10 years from the grant date. Holders of options may be granted stock appreciation rights (SARs), which entitle them to surrender outstanding awards for a cash distribution under certain changes in ownership of the Company, as defined in the stock option plan. As of June 30, 2018, no SAR’s have been granted under the option plan. As of June 30, 2018, the total number of shares of common stock available for issuance was 437,677. All outstanding options have a ten year life from the date of grant. The Company records compensation cost associated with share-based compensation equivalent to the estimated fair value of the awards over the requisite service period.

StockOptions

In calculating compensation related to stock option grants, the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model and the following weighted average assumptions: 

 

Three Months Ended

F-7
 

June 30,

2018

June 24,

2017

Dividend yield

Expected volatility

92.55%

Risk-free interest rate

2.82%

Expected term (years)

8.36Table of Contents

 

The computationBasis of expected volatility usedPresentation

Other than as noted below, there have been no material changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies previously disclosed in the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s share price. The expected term is estimated based on a review of historical employee exercise behavior with respect to option grants. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rates with maturity similar to the expected term of the option on the date of grant.2022 Annual Report.

 

 A summaryPrinciples of the changes in stock options outstanding for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended March 31, 2018 is as follows:    

      

Weighted

Average

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

  

Aggregate

 
  

Shares

  

Exercise Price

per share

  

Contractual

Terms (Years)

  

Intrinsic

Value

 

Outstanding at March 25, 2017

  1,104,500  $1.41   6.1  $3 

Granted

  856,000   0.34   10.0     

Forfeited / Expired

  (481,800

)

  1.34         

Outstanding at March 31, 2018

  1,478,700  $0.56   8.0  $ 

Granted

  50,000   0.27   10.0     

Forfeited / Expired

  (31,000)  1.41         

Outstanding at June 30, 2018

  1,497,700  $0.53   7.8  $ 
                 

Exercisable at June 30, 2018

  500,650  $0.79   4.4  $ 
                 

At June 30, 2018 expected to vest in the future

  702,491  $0.40   9.6  $ 

As of June 30, 2018, there was $205,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.71 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. There were 7,200 options that vested during the quarter ended June 30, 2018, and 26,500 options that vested during the quarter ended June 24, 2017. The total fair value of options vested during each of the quarters ended June 30, 2018 and June 24, 2017 was $9,052 and $33,000 respectively. There were no options exercised in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 and June 24, 2017. Share based compensation cost related to stock options recognized in operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and June 24, 2017 totaled $20,000 and $37,000, respectively.


Restricted StockConsolidation

 

The Company granted no restricted awards (“RSAs”) duringAcquisition was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization with GWW being the first quarteraccounting acquirer and GIGA being the acquired company for accounting purposes. All historical financial information presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements represents the accounts of fiscal 2019. No RSAs were granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2018.GWW and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries. The RSAs are considered fixed awards as the number of shares and fair value at the grant date is amortized over the requisite service period net of estimated forfeitures. As of June 30, 2018, there was $61,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSAs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.87 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. Compensation cost recognized for RSAs and unrestricted stock awards in operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and June 24, 2017 totaled $37,000 and $9,000, respectively

A summaryunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements after completion of the changes in non-vested RSAs outstanding forAcquisition will include the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 is as follows:

  

Shares

  

Weighted

Average

Fair Value

 

Non-Vested at March 25, 2017

    $ 

Granted

  586,950   0.66 

Vested

  (51,000)  (0.60)

Forfeited or cancelled

  (236,000

)

  (0.68)

Non-Vested at March 31, 2018

  299,950  $0.65 

Vested

  (37,500)  (0.39)

Non-Vested at June 30, 2018

  262,450  $0.68 

(10)          Significant Customer andIndustry Segment Information

The Company has two reportable segments: Giga-tronics Division and Microsource.

The Giga-tronics Division historically produced a broad line of test and measurement equipment used primarily for the design, production, repair and maintenance of products in aerospace, telecommunications, RADAR, and electronic warfare. The Company completed the divestiture of its switch and legacy product lines, and is now solely focused on producing the ASG and the ASA.

Microsource primarily develops and manufactures YIG RADAR filters used in fighter jet aircraft for two prime contractors. 

The tables below present information for the two reportable segments:

  

Three Month Periods

Ended

      

Three Month Periods

Ended

     

(In thousands)

 

At June 30 ,

2018

  

June 30,

2018

      

At June 24,

2017

  

June 24,

2017

     
  

Assets

  

Net Sales

  

Net Income

(Loss)

  

Assets

  

Net Sales

  

Net Income

(Loss)

 

Giga-tronics Division

 $4,418  $38  $(1559) $6,153  $297  $(1,849

)

Microsource

  1,953   1,061   1,272   2,907   1,694   591 

Total

 $6,371  $1,099  $(287) $9,060  $1,991  $(1,258

)

During the first quarter of fiscal 2019, one customer accounted for 64% of the Company’s consolidated revenues and was included in the Microsource segment. A second customer accounted for 31% and was also included in the Microsource segment. During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, one customer accounted for 43% of the Company’s consolidated revenues and was included in the Microsource segment. A second customer accounted for 37% and was also included in the Microsource segment.

(11)          Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method as codified in Topic 740. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basesoperations of GIGA and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards.

The Company recorded $62,000 income tax expense forits subsidiaries from the three months ended June 30, 2018 and no income tax expense for the three months ended June 24, 2017. In April 2018, the Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) issued its response to the Appeal filed by the Company to dispute the original audit findings related an ongoing audit. As a result of this development, the accrued state tax liability was increased by $62,000, from $45,000 to $107,000. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and June 24, 2017 was 0% each year, primarily due to a valuation allowance recorded against the net deferred tax asset balance.


As of June 30, 2018, the Company had recorded $122,000 for unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions. The unrecognized tax benefit is netted against the non-current deferred tax asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company does not expect the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change materially within the next 12 months.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), which significantly changed U.S. tax law. The Act lowered the Company’s U.S. statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, and imposes new limitations on the utilization of losses incurred in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, the enactmentClosing Date of the legislative changes has not affected the Company’s overall effective tax rate of 0%, due to, as previously noted, a full valuation allowance recorded against the net deferred tax asset balance.

(12)       Warranty Obligations

The Company records a liability in cost of sales for estimated warranty obligations at the date products are sold. Adjustments are made as new information becomes available. The following provides a reconciliation of changes in the Company’s warranty reserve. The Company provides no other guarantees.

(In thousands)

 

Three Months

Ended

June 30,

2018

  

Three Months

Ended

June 24,

2017

 

Balance at beginning of period

 $164  $123 

Provision, net

  6   1 

Warranty costs incurred

  (29

)

  (33

)

Balance at end of period

 $141  $91 

(13)       Preferred StockAcquisition. All intercompany transactions and Warrants

Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock

On March 26, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of 43,800 shares of a newly designated series of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series E Shares”) to approximately 15 private investors. The sale was completed and the Series E Shares were issued on March 28, 2018.

The purchase price for each Series E Share was $25.00. Gross proceeds received by the Company were approximately $1.095 million (the “Placement”). Net proceeds to the Company after fees and expenses of the Placement were approximately $1.0 million. Placement agent fees incurred in connection with the transaction were 5% of gross proceeds or approximately $57,000 in cash, plus warrants to purchase 5% of the number of common shares into which the Series E shares can be converted (223,000 shares) at an exercise price of $0.25 per share.

Each Series E Share is initially convertible (at the option of the holder) at a conversion price of $0.25 per share of common stock, representing 100 shares of the Company’s common stock per each Series E Share. The conversion ratio is subject to adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar transactions. As of March 31, 2018, if all 43,800 issued Series E Shares were immediately converted, holders of such shares would acquire 4,380,000 shares of common stock of the Company, or 31% of the pro forma number of shares of common stock that would be outstanding if the conversion had occurred on this date, 27% of the pro forma number of shares of common stock that would be outstanding upon the conversion of the Company’s outstanding shares of Series B, Series C and Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (collectively, the “Previously Issued Preferred Shares”) and 22% of the pro forma number of shares of common stock that would be outstanding if all shares of preferred stock were converted and all warrants exercised as of this date. The Company is entitled to redeem Series E Shares at a price equal to 300% of the Series E Share purchase price, or $75.00 per share, subject to potential adjustment, but the right to redeem is subject to satisfaction of certain conditions related to the market price and trading volume of the Company’s common stock.

Each Series E Share has a liquidation preference of 150% of the purchase price or $37.50, subject to adjustment. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, a merger, or a sale of the Company’s MSI business line or Simulation and Electronics Warfare business line or their related assets, before any payment or distribution to holders of junior shares (including common stock and Previously Issued Preferred Stock), holders of Series E Shares will be entitled to receive an amount of cash per share of Series E Shares up to the liquidation preference plus all accumulated accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. Upon a sale of the Company’s MSI business line or Simulation and Electronics Warfare business line or their related assets, holders of Series E Shares shall be entitled to receive a pro rata portion of the net sale proceeds after reasonable transaction expenses and amount payable to the Company’s secured creditors for releases of their liens on such assets, up to the liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends. If the payment per Series E Shares is less than the Series E Shares’ liquidation preference, the liquidation preference and the Series E Share redemption price will be reduced by the amount of the payment received.


Holders of Series E Shares are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, cumulative preferential dividends, payable semiannual in cash at a rate per annum equal to 6.0% of the initial purchase price of $25.00 per share or in-kind (at the Company’s election) through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, based on the 10 day volume weighted average price of the common stock.

Holders of Series E Shares generally vote together with the common stock on an as-converted basis on each matter submitted to the vote or approval of the holders of common stock, and vote as a separate class with respect to certain actions that adversely affect the rights of the holders of Series E Shares and on other matters as required by law. In addition, the approval of the Holders of the Series E shares is generally required prior to the Company’s issuance of any securities having rights senior to or in parity with the Series E Shares with respect to dividends or liquidation preferences. The Series E Shares’ right to approve parity securities will terminate at such time that (1) fewer than 22,300 Series E Shares, which is 50% of the number of Series E Shares first issued, remain outstanding or (2) the volume weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock for any 20 trading days within any 30 trading day period is $0.75 or more, the average daily trading volume over such 30 trading day period is 100,000 shares or more and there is either an effective registration statement covering resale of the shares of common stock that holders of Series E Shares would be entitled to receive upon conversion and any shares received as pay-in-kind dividends, or such share could be freely sold pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The Company and each Series E investor entered into an Investor Rights Agreement. Under this agreement, the Company agreed to, among other things, use best efforts to file certain registration statements for the resale of common stock of the Company that the investor may acquire upon conversion of the Series E Shares and may potentially receive as payment-in-kind dividends during the two years following the date of the agreement. The Company also agreed that it would not issue additional debt without the approval by holders of at least 66.6% of the Series E Shares, other than trade debt incurred in the normal course and commercial bank working capital debt, whether revolving or term debt. Concurrent with the execution of the Securities Purchase Agreement for the Series E Shares, the Company and PFG entered into a modification agreement providing for the restructuring of certain terms associated with approximately $1.7 million in indebtedness owed to PFG (see Note 8 – Term Loans, Revolving Line of Credit and Warrants).

In connection with the sale of Series E Shares, the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of certain warrants issued in connection with the Company’s private placement in January 2016 (see Note 18 – Private Placement Offering), in which the Company sold (in part) 2,787,872 warrants (a “2016 Warrant”). Each 2016 Warrant entitled the holder to purchase 0.75 shares of the Company’s common stock at the price of $1.15 per whole share. The Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of 2016 Warrants that are held by the 2016 Investors purchasing Series E Shares from $1.15 to $0.25 per share as follows: A 2016 Investor purchasing an amount equal to or exceeding the lesser of $200,000 or 50% of the amount it invested in the 2016 Private Placement will have the exercise price of all of its 2016 Warrants reduced to $0.25, and 2016 Investors purchasing less than the lesser of $200,000 or 50% of the amount it invested in the January 2016 Private Placement will have the exercise price of a ratable percentage of the 2016 Warrants reduced to $0.25. In connection with its sale of the Series E Shares, the Company reduced the exercise price of 1,759,268 of the outstanding 2016 Warrants to $0.25.

The fair value attributable to re-pricing the 2016 Warrants, provided to the participating 2016 Investors, of approximately $203,000, was deducted from the Series E gross proceeds to arrive at the initial discounted carrying value of the Series E Shares. The initial discounted carrying value resulted in recognition of a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $557,000, further reducing the initial carrying value of the Series E Shares. The discount to the aggregate stated value of the Series E Shares, resulting from recognition of the beneficial conversion feature, was immediately accreted as a reduction of common stock and an increase in the carrying value of the Series E Shares. The accretion is presented as a deemed dividend in the consolidated statements of operations.

In addition, warrants to purchase 292,727 shares of common stock held by the placement agent, as a result of a prior transaction, were amended to reduce the exercise price from $1.15 per share to $0.25 per share. The fair value attributable to re-pricing the placement agent warrants of approximately $53,000 was recognized as additional Series E issuance costs and recognized net in the carrying value of Series E Shares.

For the three months ending June 30, 2018, the Company issued an additional 8,800 shares of Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $25.00 per share for total gross proceeds of $220,000.


The table below presents information as of June 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018:

Preferred Stock

                
  

 

Shares

  

 

Shares

  

 

Shares

  

Liquidation

Preference

 
  

Designated

  

Issued

  

Outstanding

  

(in thousands)

 

Series B

  10,000.00   9,997.00   9,997.00  $2,309 

Series C

  3,500.00   3,424.65   3,424.65   500 

Series D

  6,000.00   5,111.86   5,111.86   731 

Series E

  60,000.00   43,800.00   43,800.00   1,643 

Total at March 31, 2018

  79,500.00   62,333.51   62,333.51  $5,183 
Series E      9,600.00   9,600.00   360 
Total at June 30, 2018  79,500.00   71,933.51   71,933.51  $5,413 

(14)Subsequent Events

During August 2018, the Company issued an additional 1,400 shares of Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock at a purchase of $25.00 per share for total gross proceeds of $35,000.


GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands except share data)

  

March 31,

  

March 25,

 
  

2018

  

2017

 

Assets

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash-equivalents

 $1,485  $1,421 

Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $8 and $45, respectively

  364   954 

Inventories, net

  5,487   4,811 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  87   452 

Total current assets

  7,423   7,638 

Property and equipment, net

  833   528 

Other long term assets

  175   175 

Capitalized software development costs, net

     733 

Total assets

 $8,431  $9,074 

Liabilities and shareholders' equity

        

Current liabilities:

        

Line of credit

 $552  $582 

Loan payable, net of discounts and issuance costs

  1,447    

Accounts payable

  996   1,107 

Accrued payroll and benefits

  343   583 

Deferred revenue

  3,374   3,614 

Deferred rent

  58    

Capital lease obligations

  52   50 

Deferred liability related to asset sale

  40   375 

Other current liabilities

  947   707 

Total current liabilities

  7,809   7,018 

Warrant liability, at estimated fair value

     222 

Long term deferred rent

  429    

Long term obligations - capital lease

  62   114 

Total liabilities

  8,300   7,354 

Commitments and contingencies

        

Shareholders' equity:

        

Convertible preferred stock of no par value; Authorized - 1,000,000 shares

        

Series A - designated 250,000 shares; no shares at March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 issued and outstanding

      

Series B, C, D- designated 19,500 shares; 18,533.51 shares at March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 issued and outstanding; (liquidation preference of $3,540 at March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017)

  2,911   2,911 

Series E- designated 60,000 shares; 43,800 shares at March 31, 2018 issued and outstanding; (liquidation preference of $1,643 at March 31, 2018)

  702    

Common stock of no par value; Authorized - 40,000,000 shares; 10,312,653 shares at March 31, 2018 and 9,594,203 at March 25, 2017 issued and outstanding

  25,200   24,390 

Accumulated deficit

  (28,682)  (25,581)

Total shareholders' equity

  131   1,720 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $8,431  $9,074 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands except per share data)

  

Years Ended

 
  

March 31,

  

March 25,

 
  

2018

  

2017

 
         

Net sales

 $9,800   16,267 

Cost of sales

  7,064   11,716 

Gross profit

  2,736   4,551 
         

Operating expenses:

        

Engineering

  1,794   2,254 

Selling, general and administrative

  4,076   4,641 

Total operating expenses

  5,870   6,895 
         

Operating loss

  (3,134)  (2,344)
         

Gain on adjustment of warrant liability to fair value

  172   131 

Gain on sale of product line

  324   802 

Interest expense:

        

Interest expense, net

  (461)  (111)

Interest expense from accretion of loan discount

  -   (22)

Total interest expense, net

  (461)  (133)

Loss before income taxes

  (3,099)  (1,544)

Provision for income taxes

  2   2 

Net loss

 $(3,101) $(1,546)

Deemed dividend on Series E shares

  (557)   
         

Net loss attributable to common shareholders

 $(3,658) $(1,546)
         

Loss per common share – basic

 $(0.38) $(0.16)

Loss per common share – diluted

 $(0.38) $(0.16)

Weighted average common shares used in per share calculation:

        

Basic

  9,738   9,550 

Diluted

  9,738   9,550 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In thousands except share data)

  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Accumulated     
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Deficit  Total 

Balance at March 26, 2016

  18,534  $2,911   9,549,703  $24,104  $(24,035) $2,980 

Net loss

                  (1,546)  (1,546)

Restricted stock granted

          44,500            

Share based compensation

              286       286 

Balance at March 25, 2017

  18,534   2,911   9,594,203   24,390   (25,581)  1,720 

Net loss

                  (3,101)  (3,101)

Restricted stock granted

          586,950            
Restricted stock forfeited          (236,000)            
Share based compensation              251       251 
Shares issued related to loan agreement          367,500   224       224 
Proceeds from issuance of Series E preferred stock, net of issuance costs of $102  43,800   993               993 
Repriced 2016 investor warrants      (203)      203        
Fair value of the warrants issued to EGE as issuance cost of Series E      (54)      54        
Repricing of warrants issued to EGE related to 2016 private placement      (34)      34        
Fair value of modified PFG warrants              44       44 
Beneficial Conversion Feature (BCF) upon issuance of Series E preferred shares      (557)      557        
Deemed dividend of discount to Series E preferred shares resulting from recognition of BCF      557       (557)       

Balance at March 31, 2018

  62,334  $3,613   10,312,653   25,200  $(28,682) $131 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

  

 

March 31,

2018

  

 

March 25,

2017

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net loss

 $(3,101) $(1,546)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

        

Depreciation and amortization

  1,116   827 

Share based compensation

  251   286 

Accretion of discounts and issuance costs on debt

  127   30 

Adjustment of warrant liability to fair value

  (172)  (131)
Change in fair value of equity forward  (16)   

Capitalized software development costs

     (334)

Change in other long term assets

     (167)

Gain on sale of product line

  (324)  (802)
Accrued interest and fees on loan payable  98    

Change in deferred rent

  487   (110)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Trade accounts receivable

  590   1,175 

Inventories

  (676)  883 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  365   (134)

Accounts payable

  (111)  (817)

Accrued payroll and benefits

  (240)  (64)

Deferred revenue

  (240)  810 

Other current liabilities

  229   38 

Net cash used in operating activities

  (1,617)  (56)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        

Purchases of property and equipment

  (688)  (41)

Cash received from sale of product line

     1,225 

Cash returned related to sale of product line

     (375)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

  (688)  809 
         

Cash flows from financing activities:

        
         

Payments on capital leases

  (50)  (45)

Repayments of line of credit

  (30)  (218)

Proceeds from loan payable, net of issuance costs

  1,456    

Repayments of loan payable

     (400)

Proceeds from issuance of Series E preferred stock, net of issuance costs of $102

  993    

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

  2,369   (663)
         

Increase in cash and cash-equivalents

  64   90 
         

Beginning cash and cash-equivalents

  1,421   1,331 

Ending cash and cash-equivalents

 $1,485  $1,421 
         

Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:

        

Cash paid for income taxes

 $2  $2 

Cash paid for interest

 $282  $77 

Supplementary disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:

        

Fair value of warrants issued to EGE as issuance costs for Series E

 $54  $ 

Fair value of modified warrants

 $281  $ 
Common stock issued in connection with debt issuance $224  $ 

Fully depreciated equipment disposal

 $380  $174 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1

Summary of Significant AccountingPolicies

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Giga-tronics Incorporated (“Giga-tronics”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Microsource Incorporated (“Microsource”), collectively the “Company”. The Company’s corporate office and manufacturing facilities are located in Dublin, California.

Microsource develops and manufactures a broad line of YIG (Yttrium, Iron, Garnet) tuned oscillators, filters and microwave synthesizers, which are used by its customers in operational applications and in manufacturing a wide variety of microwave instruments and devices. Microsource’s two largest customers are prime contractors for which it develops and manufactures YIG RADAR filters used in fighter jet aircraft.

The Giga-tronics Division designs, manufactures and markets a family of modular test products for use primarily in the electronic warfare (EW) segment of the defense electronics market. These modular test products are used for the construction of test and emulation systems used to validate the performance of EW equipment. Giga-tronics Division customers include major prime defense contractors, the armed services (primarily in the U.S) and research institutes. This product platform for EW test & simulation applications (formerly referred to as “Hydra”) has been the Company’s principal new product development initiative since 2011 within the test & measurement equipment marketplace, replacing its broad product line of general purpose benchtop test & measurement products used for the design, production, repair and maintenance of products in the aerospace and telecommunications equipment marketplace. The substantial majority of these legacy product lines which the Company produced over the previous 35 years were sold by the Company between 2013 and 2016 in order to fund, in part, the Company’s operations and to develop the EW test product platform. For example, we sold our SCPM product line to Teradyne in 2013; in December 2015, we sold our Power Meters and Amplifiers to Spanawave Corporation; and in June 2016, we sold our Switch product line to Astronics (see Note 10, Sale of Product Lines). The Company believes the EW test and simulation product market possesses greater long-term opportunities for revenue growth and improved gross margins compared to the general purpose test & measurement equipment marketplace.

PrinciplesofConsolidationThe consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Giga-tronics and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimatesshares and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

FiscalYearThe Company’s financial reporting year consists of either a 52 week or 53 week period ending on the last Saturday of the month of March. Fiscal year 2018 ended on March 31, 2018 resulting in a 53 week year. Fiscal year 2017 ended on March 25, 2017, which resulted in a 52 week year. All references to years in the consolidated financial statements relate to fiscal years rather than calendar years.

Revenue Recognition and Deferred RevenueThe Company records revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. This occurs when products are shipped or the customer accepts title transfer. If the arrangement involves acceptance terms, the Company defers revenue until product acceptance is received. On certain large development contracts, revenue is recognized upon achievement of substantive milestones. Determining whether a milestone is substantive is a matter of judgment and that assessment is performed only at the inception of the arrangement. The consideration earned from the achievement of a milestone must meet all of the following for the milestone to be considered substantive:

a.

It is commensurate with either of the following:

1.

The Company’s performance to achieve the milestone.

2.

The enhancement of the value of the delivered item or items as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the Company's performance to achieve the milestone.

b.

It relates solely to past performance.

c.

It is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms (including other potential milestone consideration) within the arrangement.


Milestones for revenue recognition are agreed upon with the customer prior to the start of the contract and some milestones are based on product shipping while others are based on design review. In fiscal 2015 the Company’s Microsource business unit received a $6.5 million order from a major aerospace company for non-recurring engineering services to develop a variant of its high performance fast tuning YIG filters for an aircraft platform and to deliver a limited number of flight-qualified prototype hardware units (the “NRE Order”) which is being accounted for on a milestone basis. The Company considered factors such as estimated completion dates and product acceptance of the order prior to accounting for the NRE Order as milestone revenue. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017, revenue recognized on a milestone basis were zero and $478,000, respectively.

On certain contracts with several of the Company’s significant customers the Company receives payments in advance of manufacturing. Advanced payments are recorded as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria described above has been met.

Accounts receivable are stated at their net realizable value. The Company has estimated an allowance for uncollectable accounts based on analysis of specifically identified accounts, outstanding receivables, consideration of the age of those receivables, the Company’s historical collection experience, and adjustments for other factors management believes are necessary based on perceived credit risk.

The activity in the allowance account for doubtful accounts is as follows for the years ended:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 31,

2018

  

March 25,

2017

 

Beginning balance

 $45  $45 

Provisions for doubtful accounts

  (37)   

Write-off of doubtful accounts

      

Ending balance

 $8  $45 

Accrued Warranty The Company’s warranty policy generally provides one to three years of coverage depending on the product. The Company records a liability for estimated warranty obligations at the date products are sold. The estimated cost of warranty coverage is based on the Company’s actual historical experience with its current products or similar products. For new products, the required reserve is based on historical experience of similar products until such time as sufficient historical data has been collected on the new product. Adjustments are made as new information becomes available.

Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or fair value using full absorption and standard costing. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Standard costing and overhead allocation rates are reviewed by management periodically, but not less than annually. Overhead rates are recorded to inventory based on capacity management expects for the period the inventory will be held. Reserves are recorded within cost of sales for impaired or obsolete inventory when the cost of inventory exceeds its estimated fair value. Management evaluates the need for inventory reserves based on its estimate of the amount realizable through projected sales including an evaluation of whether a product is reaching the end of its life cycle. When inventory is discarded it is written off against the inventory reserve, as inventory generally has already been fully reserved for at the time it is discarded.

Research and Development Research and development expenditures, which include the cost of materials consumed in research and development activities, salaries, wages and other costs of personnel engaged in research and development, costs of services performed by others for research and development on the Company’s behalf and indirect costs are expensed as operating expenses when incurred. Research and development costs totaled approximately $1.8 million and $2.3 million for the years ended March 25, 2018 and March 26, 2017, respectively.

PropertyandEquipmentProperty and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from three to ten years for machinery and equipment and office fixtures. Leasehold improvements and assets acquired under capital leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the respective assets or the lease term.

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If such review indicates that the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of its expected future cash flows on an undiscounted basis, the asset’s carrying amount would be written down to fair value. Additionally, the Company reports long-lived assets to be disposed of at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. As of March 31, 2018, and March 25, 2017, management believes there has been no impairment of the Company’s long-lived assets.


Warrants to Purchase Common StockWarrants are accounted for in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance provided in ASC 815 - Derivatives and Hedging as either derivative liabilities or as equity instruments depending on the specific terms of the agreements.  Liability-classified instruments are recorded at fair value at each reporting period with any change in fair value recognized as a component of change in fair value of derivative liabilities in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company estimates liability-classified instruments using either a Monte Carlo simulation or the Black Scholes option-pricing model, depending on the nature of the warrant’s terms. The valuation methodologies require management to develop assumptions and inputs that have significant impact on such valuations. The Company periodically evaluates changes in facts and circumstances that could impact the classification of warrants from liability to equity, or vice versa.

On March 26, 2018, the Company and holders of the Company’s liability-classified warrants, Partners For Growth, V L.P. (“PFG”), agreed to eliminate the $217,000 cash “put” provision contained in warrants in exchange for the Company issuing 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon removal of the put, the warrants were re-valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model prior to being reclassified to equity. The resulting change in fair value of the warrants, along with the fair value of the common stock of approximately of $50,000 issued to PFG, was recognized as gain on adjustment of warrant liability in the consolidated statements of operations.

Embedded Derivatives Embedded derivatives must be separately measured from the host contract if all the requirements for bifurcation are met. The assessment of the conditions surrounding the bifurcation of embedded derivatives depends on the nature of the host contract. Bifurcated embedded derivatives are recognized at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in the statement of operations each period. Bifurcated embedded derivatives are classified with the related host contract in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Deferred Rent Rent expense is recognized in an amount equal to the guaranteed base rent plus contractual future minimum rental increases amortized on the straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, including free rent periods.

Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Future tax benefits are subject to a valuation allowance when management is unable to conclude that its deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers both positive and negative evidence and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

The Company considers all tax positions recognized in its financial statements for the likelihood of realization. When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the positions taken or the amounts of the positions that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above, if any, would be reflected as unrecognized tax benefits, as applicable, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations.

ProductDevelopmentCostsThe Company incurs pre-production costs on certain long-term supply arrangements. The costs, which represent non-recurring engineering and tooling costs, are capitalized as other assets and amortized over their useful life when reimbursable by the customer. All other product development costs are charged to operations as incurred. Capitalized pre-production costs included in inventory were immaterial as of March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017.

Software Development Costs Development costs included in the research and development of new software products and enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred, until technological feasibility in the form of a working model has been established. Capitalized development costs are amortized over the expected life of the product and evaluated each reporting period for impairment.


Discontinued Operations The Company reviews its reporting and presentation requirements for discontinued operations as it moves to newer technology within the test and measurement market from legacy products to the newly developed Advanced Signal Generator. The disposal of these product line sales represents an evolution of the Company’s Giga-tronics Division to a more sophisticated product offered to the same customer base. The Company has evaluated the sales of product lines (see Note 10, Sale of Product Lines) concluding that each product line does not meet the definition of a “component of an entity” as defined by ASC 205-20.The Company is able to distinguish revenue and gross margin information as disclosed in Note 10, Sale of Product Lines to the accompanying financial statements; however, operations and cash flow information is not clearly distinguishable and the company is unable to present meaningful information about results of operations and cash flows from those product lines.

Share-based Compensation The Company records share-based compensation expense for the fair value of all stock options and restricted stock that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered. In fiscal 2018, the Company provided a special grant of nonqualified options to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock at the price of $0.33 per share based on reliance on the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  One fourth of the option vests on the first anniversary of the grant date and 1/48 of the option vests on each of the 36 months thereafter.

The cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) are classified as cash flows from financing in the statements of cash flows. These excess tax benefits were not significant for the Company for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 or March 25, 2017.

In calculating compensation related to stock option grants, the fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The computation of expected volatility used in the Black-Scholes- Merton option-pricing model is based on the historical volatility of Giga-tronics’ share price. The expected term is estimated based on a review of historical employee exercise behavior with respect to option grants. The risk free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since the Company has not paid dividends and has no current plans to do so in the future.

The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the fair value of the underlying shares at the date of the grant. Management makes estimates regarding pre-vesting forfeitures that will impact timing of compensation expense recognized for stock option and restricted stock awards.

Earnings or Loss Per Common Share Basic earnings or loss per common share is computed usingprior to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding duringmerger have been retroactively restated to reflect the period. Diluted earnings per share incorporate the incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method. Anti-dilutive options are not includedexchange ratio established in the computation of diluted earnings per share. Non-vested shares of restricted stock have non-forfeitable dividend rights and are considered participating securities for the purpose of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share under the two-class method.merger.

 

Comprehensive Income or Loss There are no items of comprehensive income or loss other than net income or loss.

FinancialInstrumentsandConcentrationofCreditRiskFinancial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist of cash, cash-equivalents and trade accounts receivable. The Company’s cash-equivalents consist of overnight deposits with federally insured financial institutions. Concentration of credit risk in trade accounts receivable results primarily from sales to major customers. The Company individually evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and generally does not require collateral or other security. At March 31, 2018, one customer accounted for 79% of consolidated gross accounts receivable. At March 25, 2017, three customers combined accounted for 67% of consolidated gross accounts receivable.

FairValueofFinancialInstrumentsandFairValueMeasurementsThe Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash-equivalents, line of credit, term debt, and warrant derivative liability. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability. The Company uses fair value measurements based on quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity can access as of the measurement date (Level 1), significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2), or significant unobservable inputs reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability (Level 3), depending on the nature of the item being valued.


Recently IssuedAdopted Accounting Standards

 

In April 2015,In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2015-03, “InterestNo. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) – Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance CostsCredit Losses (Topic 326),” or (“ASU 2015-03. ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring2016-13”) to improve information on credit losses for financial assets and net investment in leases that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this ASU. The amendments in thisaccounted for at fair value through net income. ASU are2016-13 replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses. This guidance was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal yearsthe Company beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years.on January 1, 2023. The adoption of this ASU by the Company changed the presentation of certain debt issuance costs, which are reported asguidance did not have a direct offset to the applicable debtmaterial impact on the balance sheet.Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In November 2015, theJanuary 2017, FASB issued ASU 2015-17 – Income Taxes2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 740)350): “Balance Sheet ClassificationSimplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminated the calculation of Deferred Taxes”. Topic 740 isimplied goodwill fair value. Instead, companies will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount of goodwill over its fair value. This guidance was effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for annual periodsthe Company beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018.on January 1, 2023. The amendments may be applied prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. The amendments in ASU 2015-17 eliminates the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this accounting standard update may have on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires that lessees recognize assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations for leases with a lease term of more than one year. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02this guidance did not have a material impact on itsthe Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”),

F-8

Note 4. Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 establishes a broad principle that would require an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this principle, an entity identifies the contract with a customer, identifies the separate performance obligations in the contract, determines the transaction price, allocates the transaction price to the separate performance obligations and recognizes revenue when each separate performance obligation is satisfied. ASU 2014-09 was further updated to provide clarification on a number of specific issues as well as requiring additional disclosures. ASU 2014-09 may be applied either retrospectively or through the use of a modified-retrospective method. The full retrospective method requires companies to recast each prior reporting period presented as if the new guidance had always existed. Under the modified retrospective method, companies would recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard as an adjustment to opening retained earnings at the date of initial application. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2017.Disaggregation

 

The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 on April 1, 2018 (beginningCompany’s disaggregated revenues are comprised of the Company’s fiscal year) using the modified retrospective method. Under this approach, no restatement of fiscal years 2017 or 2018 was required. Rather, the effect of the adoption was recorded as a cumulative adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at April 1, 2018.following (In thousands):

Schedule of disaggregated revenues        
  Three Months Ended 
Category March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022 
Primary Geographical Markets        
North America $2,328  $1,511 
Europe  2,832   2,179 
Middle East and other  3,563   3,554 
Total revenue $8,723  $7,244 
         
Major Goods        
RF/microwave filters $1,247  $1,511 
Detector logarithmic video amplifiers  545    
Power supply units and systems  2,694   2,479 
Healthcare diagnostic systems  1,193    
Defense systems  3,044   3,254 
Total revenue $8,723  $7,244 
         
Timing of Revenue Recognition        
Goods transferred at a point in time $5,087  $3,511 
Services transferred over time  3,636   3,733 
Revenue from contracts with customers $8,723  $7,244 

 

WhileNote 5. Accounts receivables, related party

The following table summarizes the Company is stillchanges in the process of finalizingCompany’s accounts receivables, related party for the impact of adoption of the new standard on its financial statements, the Company has identified that the most significant change relates to the timing of its revenue recognition on its customer contracts.

Under the legacy GAAP, the Company recorded revenue when there was persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery had occurred, the price was fixed and determinable, and collectability was reasonably assured. This occurred when products were shipped or the customer accepted title transfer. If the arrangement involved acceptance terms, the Company deferred revenue until product acceptance was received. On certain large development contracts, revenue was recognized upon achievement of substantive milestones.  Advanced payments were recorded as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria described above had been met.

Under ASU 2014-09, revenue is recognized as the customer obtains control of the goods and services promised in the contract. Given the nature of the Company’s products and terms and conditions in the contracts, the customer typically obtains control as the Company performs work under such contract. Therefore, the Company expects to recognize revenue over time for substantially all of its contracts using the percentage-of-completion cost-to-cost method. As a result, the Company anticipates recognizing revenue for these contracts as it incurs costs, as opposed to when units are delivered. This change has generally resulted in earlier revenue recognition in the performance period as compared to the legacy method for those contracts, giving rise to an increase to the Company’s opening balance of retained earnings as of April 1, 2018.


Adopting ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, involves significant new estimates and judgments such as estimating stand-alone selling prices, variable consideration, and total costs to complete the contract. All of the estimates are subject to change during the performance of the contract which may cause more variability due to significant estimates involved in the new accounting.

2

Going Concern and Management’s Plan

The Company incurred net losses of $3.1 million and $1.5 million in the fiscal yearsthree months ended March 31, 20182023 (In thousands):

Summary of changes in accounts receivables, related party    
Description Accounts
receivables,
related party
 
Balance as of January 1, 2023 $1,242 
Receipts during the period  (301)
Balance as of March 31, 2023 $941 

Note 6. Inventories, net

Inventories, net, are comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of inventories, net        
Category March 31, 2023  December 31,
2022
 
Raw materials $3,120  $2,758 
Work-in-progress  3,195   3,186 
Finished goods  1,648   1,751 
Total $7,963  $7,695 

Note 7. Property and March 25, 2017, respectively. These losses have contributedEquipment, net

Property and Equipment, net, are comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of property and equipment, net        
Category March 31, 2023  December 31,
2022
 
Machinery and equipment $6,920  $6,912 
Computer, software and related equipment  1,877   1,858 
Leasehold improvements and office equipment  2,160   2,148 
Total  10,957   10,918 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (8,884)  (8,678)
Property and equipment, net $2,073  $2,240 

Depreciation expenses related to an accumulated deficit of $28.7 million as ofthe property and equipment for the three month periods ended March 31, 2018. The Company has also experienced delays in2023 and 2022 was $181,000 and $142,000, respectively.

F-9

Note 8. Intangible Assets, net

Intangible assets, net, are comprised of the development of features, orders, and shipmentsfollowing (In thousands):

Schedule of intangible assets, net          
Category Useful Life March 31, 2023  December 31, 2022 
Trademark Indefinite life $1,503  $1,493 
Customer list 10-14 years  3,787   3,825 
Total    5,290   5,318 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization    (1,885)  (1,842)
Intangible assets, net   $3,405  $3,476 

Amortization expense for the new EW test system products. These delays have significantly contributed to a decrease in working capital (deficit) from $620,000 on March 25, 2017, to ($386,000) onthree month periods ended March 31, 2018.2023 and 2022 was $73,000 and $80,000, respectively.

 

The new EW test system products have now shipped to several customers, but potential delays infollowing table presents estimated amortization expense for each of the refinement of features, longer than anticipated sales cycles, or the ability to efficiently manufacture our EW test system products, could significantly contribute to additional future lossessucceeding five calendar years and decreases in working capital.thereafter (In thousands):

Schedule of estimated amortization expense    
Fiscal Year March 31, 2023 
2023 (remainder) $242 
2024  323 
2025  323 
2026  323 
2027  323 
2028  323 
Thereafter  45 
 $1,902 

 

To help fund operations,Note 9. Goodwill

The following table summarizes the Company relies on advances under the line of credit with Bridge Bank. The line of credit which expired on May 7, 2017, was renewed through May 6, 2019. The credit agreement includes a subjective acceleration clause, which allows for amounts due under the facility to become immediately due in the event of a material adverse changechanges in the Company’s business condition (financial or otherwise), operations, properties or prospects, or ability to repaygoodwill for the credit based on the lender’s judgement. As ofthree months ended March 31, 2018, the line of credit had a balance of $552,000, and additional borrowing capacity of $77,000, respectively.2023 (In thousands):

Schedule of changes in goodwill    
Description Goodwill 
Balance as of January 1, 2023 $9,054 
Effect of exchange rate changes  (106)
Balance as of March 31, 2023 $8,948 

 

During April 2017, we entered into a $1.5 million loan agreement with Partners For Growth, V L.P. (“PFG”) to provide additional cash to fund our operations. As a result of experiencing continued delays in receiving EW test system product orders in fiscal 2018, we were unable to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants required by the PFG loan and, as a result, were subject to a default interest rate between June 2017 and March 2018. On March 26, 2018, and concurrent with the execution of certain stock purchase agreements for the sale of new Series E Convertible Preferred Stock and conditional upon the sale of at least $1.0 million in gross proceeds thereof, the Company and PFG entered into a modification agreement which provided for the restructuring of certain terms of the PFG loan including resetting of the financial covenants for the remaining loan term (see

Note 8, Term Loans, Revolving Line of Credit and Warrants).

In order to raise additional working capital and to restructure the PFG loan, on March 26, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of 43,800 shares of a newly designated series of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series E Shares”) to approximately 15 private investors. The purchase price for each Series E Share was $25.00. Gross proceeds received by the Company were approximately $1.095 million (the “Placement”). Net proceeds to the Company after fees and expenses of the Placement was approximately $1.0 million. Each Series E Share is initially convertible at the option of the holder at the purchase price of $0.25 per share of common stock, which is 100 shares of the Company’s common stock per each Series E Share (see Note 19, Private Preferred Stock and Warrants – Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock).

To assist with the upfront purchases of inventory required for future product deliveries, the Company entered into advance payment arrangements with certain customers, whereby the customers reimburse the Company for raw material purchases prior to the shipment of the finished products. The Company will continue to seek similar terms in future agreements with these customers and other customers.

Management will continue to review all aspects of its business including, but not limited to, the contribution of its individual business segments, in an effort to improve cash flow and reduce costs and expenses, while continuing to invest, to the extent possible, in new product development for future revenue streams.

Management will also continue to seek additional working capital and liquidity through debt (including debt refinancing), equity financing or possible product line sales or cessation of unprofitable business product lines, however there are no assurances that such financings or product line sales will be available at all, or on terms acceptable to the Company.


Our historical operating results and forecasting uncertainties indicate that substantial doubt exists related to our ability to continue as a going concern. Management believes that through the actions to date and possible future actions described above, we should have the necessary liquidity to continue operations at least twelve months from the issuance of the financial statements. However, we cannot predict, with certainty, the outcome of our actions to maintain or generate additional liquidity, including the availability of additional financing, or whether such actions would generate the expected liquidity as currently planned. Forecasting uncertainties also exist with respect to our EW test system product line due to the potential longer than anticipated sales cycles, as well as with potential delays in the refinement of certain features, and/or our ability to efficiently manufacture it in a timely manner.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result if the Company were unable to do so.

3

Cash and Cash-Equivalents

Cash and cash-equivalents of $1.5 million and $1.4 million at March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017, respectively, consisted of demand deposits with a financial institution that is a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). At March 31, 2018, $1.2 million of the Company’s demand deposits exceeded FDIC insurance limits.

4

Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 31,

2018

  

March 25,

2017

 

Raw materials

 $2,290  $1,775 

Work-in-progress

  2,100   2,155 

Finished goods

  561   473 

Demonstration inventory

  536   408 

Total

 $5,487  $4,811 

5

Property, Plant and Equipment,net10. Other Current Liabilities

Property, plant and equipment, net is comprised of the following:

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

March 31,

2018

  

 

March 25,

2017

 

Leasehold improvements

 $633   327 

Machinery and equipment

  4,333   4,330 

Computer and software

  681   678 

Furniture and office equipment

  227   231 

Subtotal

  5,874   5,566 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (5,041)  (5,038)

Total

 $833  $528 

6

Software DevelopmentCosts

On September 3, 2015, the Company entered into a software development agreement with a major aerospace and defense company whereby the aerospace company developed and licensed its simulation software to the Company. The simulation software (also called Open Loop Simulator or OLS technology) is currently the aerospace company’s intellectual property. The OLS technology generates threat simulations and enables various hardware to generate signals for performing threat analysis on systems under test. The Company licenses the OLS software as a bundled or integrated solution with its Advanced Signal Generator system.

The Company paid the aerospace company software development costs and fees for OLS of $1.2 million in the aggregate (this includes an amendment to the software development agreement for additional features and functionality), which was paid in monthly installments as the work was performed by the aerospace company through the third quarter of fiscal 2017. The OLS technology is a perpetual license agreement that may be terminated by the Company at any time as long as the Company provides a notice to the aerospace company and pays for the development costs incurred through the notice termination date. The Company is also obligated to pay royalties to the aerospace company on net sales of its Advanced Signal Generator product sold with the OLS software equal to seven percent of net sales price of each ASG system sold and subject to certain minimums. The Company expenses research and development costs as they are incurred. Development costs of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are subject to capitalization beginning when a product’s technological feasibility has been established and ending when a product is available for general release to customers.


 

As of March 31, 2018,2023 and March 25, 2017, capitalized software costs were zero and $733,000, respectively. The Company began amortizing the costs of capitalized software to cost of sales in fiscal 2017 using the percentage of revenue approach. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company revised its estimates in accounting for the amortizationDecember 31, 2022, other current liabilities consist of the capitalized software costs due to the long procurement cycle associated with the product. The Company had previously elected to amortize the capitalized software costs on a straight-line basis over a three year period, however, the Company revised its estimates based on the percentage of revenue associated with the current period revenues. This change in estimate and remaining amortization increased the Company’s cost of sales by $733,000 in fiscal 2018.following (In thousands):

Schedule of other current liabilities        
Category March 31, 2023  December 31, 2022 
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes $2,412  $2,401 
Deferred revenue  1,256   1,028 
Other accrued expense  356   825 
Other current liabilities $4,024  $4,254 

Note 11. Leases

 

7

Operating leases

Accounts Receivable Line of Credit

 

On June 1, 2015, the Company entered into a $2.5 million Revolving Accounts Receivable Line of Credit agreement with Bridge Bank. The agreement providesWe have operating leases for a maximum borrowing capacity of $2.5 millionoffice space. Our leases have remaining lease terms from 6 months to 8.5 years, some of which $2.0 million is subjectmay include options to a borrowing base calculationextend the leases perpetually, and $500,000 is non-formula based. On May 23, 2017,some of which may include options to terminate the Company renewed this credit line (which expired on May 7, 2017) through May 6, 2019.leases within 1 year.

 

The loan agreement is secured by all assetscomponents of the Company including intellectual property and general intangibles and provides for a borrowing capacity equal to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. The loan matures on May 6, 2019 and bears an interest rate equal to 1.5% over the bank’s prime rate of interest (which was 4.50% at March 31, 2018 resulting in an interest rate of 6.0%). Interest is payable monthly with principal due upon maturity. The Company paid an annual commitment fee of $12,500 in May 2017. The loan agreement contains financial and non-financial covenants that are customary for this type of lending and includes a covenant to maintain an asset coverage ratio of at least 150% (defined as unrestricted cash and cash equivalents maintained with Bridge Bank, plus eligible accounts receivable aged less than 90 days from the invoice date, divided by the total amount of outstanding principal of all obligations under the loan agreement). While the Company maintained the asset coverage ratio, the Company was in a cross default during the period in which it was in non-compliance with its loan with PFG (see Note 8 below).

The line of credit requires a lockbox arrangement, which provides for receipts to be swept daily to reduce borrowings outstanding at the discretion of Bridge Bank. This arrangement, combined with the existence of the subjective acceleration clause in the line of credit agreement, necessitates the line of credit be classified as a current liability on the balance sheet. The acceleration clause allows for amounts due under the facility to become immediately due in the event of a material adverse change in the Company’s business condition (financial or otherwise), operations, properties or prospects, or ability to repay the credit based on the lender's judgment. As of March 31, 2018, the line of credit had a balance of $552,000, and additional borrowing capacity of $77,000, respectively.

8

Term Loans, Revolving Line of Credit and Warrants

2017 Loan Agreement

On April 27, 2017, the Company entered into a $1,500,000 loan agreement with Partners For Growth V, L.P. (“PFG”), which was funded by PFG on April 28, 2017 (the “2017 Loan”). The 2017 Loan, which matures on April 27, 2019, provides for interest only payments during the term of the loan with principal and any accrued interest and fees due upon maturity. The 2017 Loan bears interest at a fixed aggregate per annum rate equal to 16% per annum, of which 9.5% per annum rate is payable monthly in cash and 6.5% per annum rate is accrued monthly and due upon maturity. In addition, the Company agreed to pay PFG a cash fee of up to $100,000 payable upon maturity (the “back-end fee”), $76,000 of which was earned on April 27, 2017, and $24,000 of which is earned at the rate of $1,000 per month on the first day of each month if the loan principal (or any amount thereof) is outstanding during any day of the prior month. If the Company meets or exceeds certain revenue and net income minimums in fiscal 2018, the amount could be reduced by 25 percent.

Additionally, the 2017 Loan provideslease expenses for the Company’s issuance of up to 250,000 common shares to PFG, of which 190,000 was earned by PFG upon signing (April 27, 2017) and 60,000 of which is earned at the rate of 2,500 per month on the first day of each month if the loan principal (or any amount thereof) is outstanding during any day of the prior month. The 2017 Loan provided for certain financial covenants related to the revenue achievement and maintenance of tangible net worth. PFG can accelerate the maturity of the loan in case of a default and the Company can prepay the loan before maturity without interest prepayments or penalty. The Company has pledged all of its assets as collateral for the 2017 Loan, including all its accounts, inventory, equipment, deposit accounts, intellectual property and all other personal property. The 2017 Loan is subordinate to the Bridge Bank line of credit (see Note 7, Accounts Receivable Line of Credit).


The requirement to issue 60,000 shares of the Company’s common stock over the term of the loan is an embedded derivative (an embedded equity forward). The Company evaluated the embedded derivative in accordance with ASC 815-15-25. The embedded derivative is not clearly and closely related to the debt host instrument and therefore has been separately measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.

The proceeds received upon issuing the loan was allocated to: i) common stock, for the fair value of the 190,000 shares of common stock initially issued to the lender; ii) the fair value of the embedded derivative; and iii) the loan host instrument. Upon issuance of the loan, the Company recognized $1,576,000 of principal payable to PFG, representing the stated principal balance of $1,500,000 plus the initial back-end fee of $76,000. The initial carrying value of the loan was recognized net of debt discount aggregating approximately $326,000, which is comprised of the following:

Fees paid to the lender and third parties $44,000 
Back-end fee  76,000 
Estimated fair value of embedded equity forward  49,000 
Fair value of 190,000 shares of common stock issued to lender  157,000 
Aggregate discount amount $326,000 

The bifurcated embedded derivative and the debt discount are presented net with the related loan balance in the consolidated balance sheets. The debt discount is amortized to interest expense over the loan’s term using the effective interest method. During the fiscal yearthree months ended March 31, 2018, the Company amortized discounts of approximately $127,000 to interest expense. As of March 31, 2018, the Company had issued to PFG 367,500 common shares under the loans.2023 and 2022 were as follow (In thousands):

 

PFG’s ability to call the debt on default (contingent put) and its ability to assess interest rate at a default rate (contingent interest) are embedded derivatives, which the Company evaluated. The fair value of these embedded features was determined to be immaterial and was not bifurcated from the debt host for accounting purposes.

Between June 24, 2017 and March 25, 2018, the Company was not in compliance with the loan’s revenue and tangible net worth financial covenants and was subject to a default interest rate of 22% per annum which it accrued and paid when due during this period.

On March 26, 2018, concurrent with the execution of the Securities Purchase Agreement for the Series E Shares (see Note 19 – Preferred Stock and Warrants - Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock), the Company and PFG entered into a modification agreement providing for the restructuring of certain terms associated with approximately $1.7 million in indebtedness under the 2017 Loan. Subject to the sale of at least $1.0 million in Series E Shares, PFG agreed to waive all current defaults and cease applying the applicable default interest rate, returning to the stated non-default rate of 16%, and to lower the revenue and tangible net worth covenants for the remaining term of the loan. As consideration for the modifications, the Company reduced the exercise price of outstanding warrants previously granted to PFG pursuant to the 2014 Loan Agreement and Credit Line to purchase 260,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (see 2014 Loan Agreement, Line Credit and Warrants below) from $1.42 to $0.25 per share and extended the exercisability of the warrants by one year to March 13, 2020.

The amendments to the 2017 Loan were recognized as a loan modification. The change in fair value of the warrants of $43,700, resulting from the reduced strike price and extension of term, was recognized as a discount to the 2017 Loan and is being amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the 2017 Loan.

The Company anticipates it will need to seek additional funds through the issuance of new debt, equity securities or product line sales in order to repay the 2017 Loan (including accrued interest and back end fees) in full upon maturity or otherwise enter into a refinancing agreement with PFG. However, there can be no assurances that such financings, re-financing or product line sales will be available at all, or on terms acceptable to the Company.

2014 Loan Agreement, Line of Credit and Warrants

On March 13, 2014, the Company entered into a three year, $2.0 million term loan agreement with PFG under which the Company received $1.0 million on March 14, 2014.


On June 16, 2014, the Company amended its loan agreement with PFG (the “Amendment”). Under the terms of the Amendment, PFG made a revolving credit line available to Giga-tronics in the amount of $500,000, which the Company borrowed the entire amount on June 17, 2014. The revolving credit line had a thirty-three month term. The Amendment also reduced the remaining borrowing capacity under the PFG Loan agreement from $1.0 million to $500,000. Interest on the initial $1.0 million term loan was fixed at 9.75% and required monthly interest only payments during the first six months of the agreement followed by monthly principal and interest payments over the remaining thirty months. The interest on the PFG revolving credit line was fixed, calculated on a daily basis at a rate of 12.50% per annum. The Company was allowed to prepay the loan at any time prior to its March 13, 2017 maturity date without a penalty.

On June 3, 2015, the Company further amended its loan agreement with PFG (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment cancelled the Company’s $500,000 of borrowing availability under the June 2014 Amendment and required the Company to pay PFG $150,000 towards its existing $500,000 outstanding balance under the revolving line of credit, which the Company paid in July 2015. The Company also agreed to pay PFG an additional $10,000 per month towards its remaining credit line balance until repaid, followed by like payments towards its term loan balance until repaid. As of March 26, 2016, the $500,000 borrowed with the June 2014 Amendment had been fully repaid. The $500,000 credit line and the $1.0 million term loan were fully repaid by the Company as of March 25, 2017.

The Company paid a loan fee of $30,000 upon the initial draw (“First Draw”) and $15,000 for the June 2014 Amendment. The loan fees paid were recorded as prepaid expenses and amortized to interest expense over the term of the PFG amended loan agreement. In addition, the loan agreement provided for the issuance of warrants convertible into 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which 180,000 were exercisable upon receipt of the initial $1.0 million from the First Draw, 80,000 became exercisable with the First Amendment and 40,000 were cancelled as a result of the Second Amendment. Each warrant issued under the loan agreement has a term of five years and an exercise price of $1.42 per common share.

If the warrants are not exercised before expiration on March 13, 2019, the Company would be required to pay PFG $150,000 and $67,000 as settlement for warrants associated with the First Draw and the Amendment, respectively. The warrants could be settled for cash at an earlier date in the event of any acquisition or other change in control of the Company, future public issuance of Company securities or liquidation (or substantially similar event) of the Company. The cash “put” provision results in the warrants being recognized as a derivative liability measured at fair value each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded in the accompanying statement of operations as a gain on adjustment of derivative liability to fair value.

As of March 25, 2017, the estimated fair values of the derivative liabilities associated with the warrants issued in connection with the First Draw and Amendment were $133,000 and $89,000, respectively, for a combined value of $222,000. On March 26, 2018, the Company and PFG agreed to eliminate the cash put provision contained in warrants in exchange for the Company issuing 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon removal of the put, the warrants were re-valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model prior to being reclassified to equity. The resulting change in fair value of the warrants, along with the fair value of the common stock approximately $50,000 issued to PFG, was recognized as gain on adjustment of warrant liability in the consolidated statements of operations.

The initial $1.0 million in proceeds under the term loan agreement were allocated between the PFG Loan and the warrants based on their relative fair values on the date of issuance, which resulted in initial carrying values of $822,000 and $178,000, respectively. The resulting discount of $178,000 on the PFG Loan was accreted to interest expense under the effective interest method over the term of the PFG Loan, and as of March 25, 2017 had been fully accreted since the $1.0 million had been fully repaid.

The proceeds from the $500,000 credit line issued in connection with the Amendment were allocated between the PFG Loan and the warrants based on their relative fair values on the date of issuance, which resulted in initial carrying values of $365,000 and $135,000, respectively. The resulting discount of $135,000 on the PFG Loan was accreted to interest expense under the effective interest method over the term of the PFG Loan, and as of March 26, 2016 had been fully accreted since the $500,000 from the Amendment had been fully repaid.

For the fiscal year ended March 25, 2017, the Company recorded accretion of discount expense associated with the warrants issued with the PFG Loan of $22,000.

9

Fair Value

Pursuant to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and its subsequent updates, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The accounting guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring the use of observable market data when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on active market data. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances.


The fair value hierarchy is broken down into the three input levels summarized below:

 

Level 1 —Valuations are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and readily accessible by us at the reporting date. Examples of assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs are certain money market funds, U.S. Treasuries and trading securities with quoted prices on active markets.

Level 2 —Valuations based on inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly in active markets. Examples of assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs are U.S. government agency bonds, corporate bonds, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and over-the-counter derivatives.

Level 3 —Valuations based on unobservable inputs in which there are little or no market data, which require us to develop our own assumptions.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash and cash-equivalents and line of credit approximate their fair values at each balance sheet date due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments, and generally result in inputs categorized as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value of the outstanding PFG loan approximates the estimated aggregate fair value and classified with the loan host. The fair value estimate of the embedded equity forward is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the measurement date, the risk-free rate, the date of expiration, and any expected cash distributions of the underlying asset before expiration. The estimated fair value of the embedded equity forward represents a Level 2 measurement.

The Company’s derivative warrant liability is measured at fair value on a recurring basis and is categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. As of March 25, 2017, the warrant liability is valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model, which used the following assumptions as of March 25, 2017: (i) remaining term of 2.0 years, (ii) expected volatility of 101.1%, (iii) risk-free interest rate of 1.26%, and (iv) a discount rate of 24%. The Monte Carlo simulation model simulated the Company’s stock price through the maturity date of March 31, 2019. At the end of the simulated period, the value of the warrant was determined based on the greater of (1) the net share settlement value, (2) the net exercise value, or (3) the fixed cash put value.

On March 26, 2018, the Company and PFG agreed to eliminate the cash put provision contained in warrants in exchange for the Company issuing 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon removal of the put, the warrants were re-valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) remaining term of 0.96 years, (ii) expected volatility of 85%, (iii) risk-free interest rate of 2.12%, and (iv) no expected dividends. The resulting change in fair value of the warrants, along with the fair value of the common stock issued to PFG, was recognized as an adjustment of warrant liability in the consolidated statements of operations.


The aforementioned warrant liability and equity forward are the Company’s only asset and liability recognized and measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis and are as follows:

Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2018F-10 
(In Thousands):Table of Contents

Schedule of components of lease expenses        
  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022 
Operating lease cost $356  $273 

Supplemental unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet information related to operating leases was as follows:

Summary of supplemental unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet information related to operating leases      
  Level1Three Months EndedThree Months Ended
March 31, 2023March 31, 2022
Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases5.6 years  Level28.5 years
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leasesN/A%  Level38%

Maturity of lease liabilities under our non-cancellable operating leases as of March 31, 2023 are as follow (In thousands):

Maturity of lease liabilities under non-cancellable operating leases    
Fiscal Year Operating leases 
2023 (remaining) $963 
2024  932 
2025  770 
2026  509 
2027  357 
2028  357 
Thereafter  760 
Total future minimum lease payments  4,648 
Less: imputed interest  (919)
Present value of lease liabilities $3,729 

Note 12. Fair value of financial instruments

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The fair value hierarchy table for the periods indicated is as follows:

Schedule of recurring basis fair value measurements                
  Fair value measurement on a recurring basis at reporting
date using (1)
 
(In thousands) Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Balance at March 31, 2023                
Senior Secured Convertible Note (2), related party $  $  $3,717  $3,717 
Senior Secured Convertible Note (3), related party        5,725   5,725 
Senior Secured Convertible Note (4)        1,660   1,660 
Warrant liability        734   734 
Total liabilities measured at fair value $  $  $11,836  $11,836 
Balance at December 31, 2022                
Senior Secured Convertible Note (2), related party $  $  $3,940  $3,940 
Senior Secured Convertible Note (3), related party        6,068   6,068 
Total liabilities measured at fair value $  $  $10,008  $10,008 

Warrant Liability1There were no transfers between the respective Levels during the three month period ended March 31, 2023 and the year ended December 21, 2022.

The Company assesses the inputs used to measure fair value using the three-tier hierarchy based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. For investments where little or no public market exists, management’s determination of fair value is based on the best available information which may incorporate management’s own assumptions and involves a significant degree of judgment, taking into consideration various factors including earnings history, financial condition, recent sales prices of the issuer’s securities and liquidity risks.

 $$
Total$$F-11 

Fair Value Measurements as of March 25, 2017            
(In Thousands):            
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Warrant Liability $     $222 
Total $  $  $222 
Table of Contents

 

There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or LevelBelow are the changes to level 3 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017.measured liabilities:

Schedule of changes to level 3 measured liabilities Level 3 measured 
  liabilities 
Fair value at December 31, 2022 $10,008 
Fair value of senior secured convertible notes issued  1,803 
Fair value of  warrants issued with senior secured convertible notes  1,530 
Change in fair value  (1,505)
Fair value at March 31, 2023 $11,836 

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the warrant liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended March 25, 2017Note 13. Senior Secured Convertible Notes (4) and March 31, 2018:Warrants

  Years Ended 

 

(In thousands)

 

Mar. 31,

2018

  

Mar. 25,

2017

 

Warrant liability at beginning of year

 $222  $353 

Change in fair value of warrant liability

  (222)  (131)

Warrant liability at end of period

 $  $222 


10

Sale of Product Lines

 

On June 20, 2016,January 11, 2023, the Company entered into an Asseta Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of its Switch product line(“SPA”) pursuant to Astronics Test Systems Inc. (Astronics). Upon signing the agreement, Astronics paid $850,000 for the intellectual property of the product line. The Company recognized a net gain of $802,000 in the first quarter ended June 25, 2016 after related expenses were subtracted from the sales price. The following table presents the breakdown of the gain recognized related to the asset sale:

(In thousands)

    

Cash received from Astronics

 $850 

Cash paid to buy out future commission obligation

  (170)

Employee severance

  (97)

Legal fees

  (13)

Commissions

  (46)
Warranty liability released  278 
Net gain recognized $802 

In calculating the gain included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company released $278,000 of deferred warranty obligations related to the Switch asset. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Astronics assumed all the warranty obligations for the Switch product line, including the products sold prior to the asset being transferred to Astronics. The deferred warranty obligation was previously included in other current liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. The Company also had an existing agreement with a consultant supporting the Switch product line which included a three percent commission on the sales of the Switch product line for a period of 4 years ending in January 2020. The agreement allowed for a buyout of future commissions associated with the Switch product which the Company exercisedissued $3.3 million 10% original issue discount Senior Secured Convertible Notes (4) (the “Notes”) and five-year common stock purchase warrants, for total gross proceeds of $3,000,000.

Senior Secured Convertible Notes (4)

Notes payable at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, were comprised of the following:

Summary of notes payable at fair value    
Fair value (In thousands) Total 
Balance as of December 31, 2022 $ 
Issuance of Senior Secured Convertible Notes (4) at January 11, 2023  1,803 
Change in fair value of Senior Secured Convertible Notes  (143)
Balance as of March 31, 2023 $1,660 

The Notes are secured by the assets of the Company pursuant to a Security Agreement entered into for such purpose, and are senior to the indebtedness payable to AAI and Ault Lending, pursuant to a Subordination Agreement entered into in connection with the Astronics transaction in June 2016 resulting inSPA.

The Notes mature on the earlier of (i) October 6, 2023, or (ii) completion of an uplisting to a payment bynational securities exchange (an “Uplist Transaction”).

The Notes accrue interest at a rate of 6% per annum payable monthly, which increases to 18% upon an event of default. In addition, under the Notes upon an event of default the Company during Juneis required to pay 20% of $170,000. Astronicsits consolidated revenues monthly on each interest payment date in reduction of the principal amount of the Notes then outstanding.

The Notes provide for certain events of default which include:

·failure of the Uplist Transaction to occur by the maturity date;

·failure to maintain effectiveness of the registration statement under the Registration Rights Agreement;

·suspension of trading of the Company’s common stock for five consecutive trading days;

·failure to timely deliver shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes or exercise of the Warrants;

·failure to timely make payments under the Notes;

·default under other indebtedness, and

·certain other customary events of default, subject to certain exceptions and limitations

Upon an event of default, the holders will have the right to require the Company to prepay the Notes at a 125% premium (“Premium”). Further, upon a bankruptcy event of default or a change of control event, the Company will be required to prepay the Notes at a Premium. If the conversion price falls below $0.25, the Company may also purchased approximately $500,000elect to prepay the notes at a 125% Premium.

The Notes contain customary restrictive covenants including covenants against incurring new indebtedness or liens, changing the nature of related materials inventory from Giga-tronics between Julyits business, transfers of assets, transactions with affiliates, and Augustissuances of 2016.securities, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

Senior Secured Convertible Notes, Fair Value

 

The Company had no revenues or gross marginelected the fair value option with respect to the Senior Secured Convertible notes. The fair value of the Notes liability was determined based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The Company used the probability-weighted expected return method ("PWERM") to value the Notes liability. This approach involved the estimation of future potential outcomes for the Notes holders, as well as values and probabilities associated with the Switch product line during fiscal 2018. During fiscal 2017, the Switch product line accounted for approximately $2.1 million in Giga-tronics Division product revenue and $437,000 related gross margin. While the Company is able to distinguish revenue and gross margin information related to the sale of the Switch product line to Astronics, the Company is unable to present meaningful information about results of operations and cash flows from the Switch product line.each respective potential outcome.

F-12

 

On December 15, 2015,January 11, 2023, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Spanawave Corporation, whereby Spanawave agreedascribed following probabilities to purchase the Giga-tronics Division product lines for its Power Meters, Amplifiers, and Legacy Signal Generators for $1.5 million. Although the asset purchase agreement was for $1.5 million, the Company never realized this amount as a result of the dispute with Spanawave as discussed below. The agreement provided for the transfer of these product lines to Spanawave sequentially in six phases beginning with certain sensor and amplifier products. The Company had transferred the Power Meters and Amplifiers in phases one through five, but still holds the rights to phase 6 (Legacy Signal Generators). During the second quarter ended September 24, 2016, the Company and Spanawave became engaged in a dispute, including litigation initiated by Spanawave and an arbitration proceeding initiated by Spanawave’s affiliate Liberty Test Equipment, Inc. (“Liberty Test”), as to whether the Company had fulfilled all the requirements to close phases one through five and become entitled to the $375,000 received by the Company during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 (see below).four possible scenarios:

 

The complaint sought specific performance of the agreement and damages. Spanawave’s affiliate Liberty Test also filed an arbitration claim for $440,000 under a distribution agreement between the Company and Liberty. The Company filed cross-complaints in both the litigation and arbitration asserting breach of the respective agreements by Spanawave and Liberty. The Company had previously asserted that the distribution agreement did not extend to the products with respect to which the claim has been made. The parties negotiated in an effort to settle the dispute notwithstanding the filings. On October 16, 2017, the Company reached a settlement agreement with Spanawave and Liberty Test whereby all parties exchanged mutual releases and agreed that phases one through five of the Asset Purchase Agreement were concluded and the sale of the remaining phase (Phase 6) to Spanawave (which was in dispute) was abandoned. The abandoned Phase 6 Legacy Signal Generators product line (and related inventory) remains an asset of the Company. The Company, Spanawave and Liberty Test also dismissed all arbitration claims as part of the settlement.


During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company received $375,000 from Spanawave. In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company received an additional $375,000 from Spanawave under the agreement, for a combined total of $750,000. Of this amount, the Company returned $375,000 to Spanawave on July 28, 2016 resulting from the dispute regarding the status of phases one through five. The remaining $375,000 was included in deferred liability related to asset sales in the consolidated balance sheet during the dispute. However, as a result of the settlement of the dispute in the third quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company recognized a net gain of $324,000, which is net of approximately $51,000 in expenses associated with the Spanawave asset sale. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017, these product lines accounted for approximately zero and $437,000 in revenue, respectively. In addition, in June 2016, the Company received approximately $275,000 in exchange for raw material purchases. The purchase price of the raw materials approximated its carrying value, therefore no gain or loss was recognized. While the Company is able to distinguish revenue and gross margin information related to the sale of these product lines, the Company is unable to present meaningful information about results of operations and cash flows from these product lines.

11

Selling and Advertising Expenses

Selling expenses consist primarily of salaries to employees and commissions paid to various sales representatives and marketing agencies. Commission expense totaled $43,000 and $121,000 for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. Advertising costs, which are expensed as incurred, totaled $23,000 and $58,000 for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.

12

Significant Customers and Industry Segment Information

Summary of estimated probability and estimated date of notes payable        
  March 31, 2023 January 11, 2023
Scenario description Estimated
probability
 Estimated date Estimated
probability
 Estimated date
Uplist transaction 10.0% September 30, 2023 60.0% June 30, 2023
Held to maturity 60.0% October 6, 2023 10.0% October 6, 2023
Change of control 5.0% September 30, 2023 5.0% September 30, 2023
Default/ dissolution 25.0% September 1, 2023 25.0% September 1, 2023
Total 100.0%   100.0%  

 

The Company has two reportable segments: Microsourcefiled an S-1 registration statement on February 13, 2023, for AAI to distribute its common and preferred shares of GIGA as a dividend to its stockholders, which was a critical step for the Uplist Transaction scenario. By March 31, 2023, the approval of the S-1 registration statement was delayed and the Giga-tronics Division. Microsource developsCompany reduced the probability to complete the Uplist prior to September 30, 2023 to 10%, and manufactures a broad line of Yttrium, Iron and Garnet (YIG) tuned oscillators, filters and microwave synthesizers, which are used in a wide variety of microwave instruments or devices. Microsource’s two largest customers are prime contractors for which it develops and manufactures YIG RADAR filters used in fighter jet aircraft.increased the likelihood that the Notes liability will remain outstanding until maturity to 60%.

 

The Giga-tronics Division designs, manufactures and markets a family of modular test products for use primarily inBased on these estimates, the electronic warfare (EW) segmentCompany arrived at the fair value of the defense electronics market. These modular test products are used for the construction of test and emulation systems used to validate the performance of EW equipment. Giga-tronics Division customers include major prime defense contractors, the armed services (primarily in the U.S) and research institutes. This product platform for EW test & simulation applications (formerly referred toNotes liability as “Hydra”) has been the Company’s principal new product development initiative since 2011 within the test & measurement equipment marketplace, replacing its broad product line of general purpose benchtop test & measurement products used for the design, production, repair and maintenance of products in the aerospace and telecommunications equipment marketplace. The substantial majority of these legacy product lines which the Company produced over the previous 35 years were sold by the Company between 2013 and 2016 in order to fund, in part, the Company’s operations and to develop the EW test product platform.

The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those described in the "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies". The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on earnings before income taxes. Segment net sales include sales to external customers. Inter-segment activities are eliminated in consolidation. Assets include accounts receivable, inventories, equipment, cash, deferred income taxes, prepaid expenses and other long- term assets. The Company accounts for inter-segment sales and transfers at terms that allow a reasonable profit to the seller. During the periods reported there were no significant inter-segment sales or transfers.

The Company's reportable operating segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each business utilizes different technology and requires different accounting systems. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is considered to be the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The CEO reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues and pre-tax income or loss by operating segment.

The tables below present information for the fiscal years ended in 2018 and 2017.

 

March 31, 2018 (Dollars in thousands)

 

Giga-tronics

Division

  

 

Microsource

  

 

Total

 

Revenue

 $2,737  $7,063  $9,800 

Interest expense, net

  (461)     (461)

Depreciation and amortization

  1,116   1   1,117 

Capital expenditures

  (688)     (688)

Income/(Loss) before income taxes

  (5,847)  2,748   (3,099)

Assets

  5,253   3,178   8,431 


 

March 25, 2017 (Dollars in thousands)

 

Giga-tronics

Division

  

 

Microsource

  

 

Total

 

Revenue

 $8,021  $8,246  $16,267 

Interest expense, net

  133      133 

Depreciation and amortization

  820   7   827 

Capital expenditures

  41      41 

Income/(Loss) before income taxes

  (2,702)  1,158   (1,544)

Assets

  6,433   2,641   9,074 

The Company’s Giga-tronics Division and Microsource segments sell to agencies of the U.S. government and U.S. defense- related customers. In fiscal 2018 and 2017, U.S. government and U.S. defense-related customers accounted for 88% and 78% of sales, respectively. During fiscal 2018, the Boeing Company accounted for 29% of the Company’s consolidated revenues and was included in the Microsource segment. A second customer, CSRA LLC (CSRA acted as Prime Contractor for the United States Navy) accounted for 20% of the Company’s consolidated revenues during fiscal 2018 and was included in the Giga-tronics Division reporting segment. A third customer, Lockheed Martin accounted for 41% of the Company’s revenue and was included in the Microsource segment.

During fiscal 2017, the Boeing Company accounted for 33% of our consolidated revenues and was included in the Microsource reporting segment. A second customer, CSRA LLC (CSRA acted as Prime Contractor for the United States Navy) accounted for 20% of our consolidated revenues during fiscal 2017 and was included in the Giga-tronics Division reporting segment. A third customer, Lockheed Martin accounted for 14% of the Company’s revenue and was included in the Microsource segment.

Export sales accounted for 8% and 2% of the Company’s sales in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. Export sales by geographical area for these fiscal years are shown below:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 31,

2018

  

March 25,

2017

 

Americas

 $  $ 

Europe

  40   249 

Asia

     15 

Rest of world

  702   64 

Total

 $742  $328 

13

Loss per Common Share

The stock options, restricted stock, convertible preferred stocks and warrants not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share (EPS) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 is a result of the Company’s net loss and, therefore, the effect of these instruments would be anti-dilutive.

Stock options not included in computation that could potentially dilute EPS in the future

  1,479   1,105 

Restricted stock awards not included in computation that could potentially dilute EPS in the future

  300    

Convertible preferred stock not included in computation that could potentially dilute EPS in the future

  1,858   1,853 

Warrants not included in computation that could potentially dilute EPS in the future

  3,960   3,737 
   7,597   6,695 


The stock options, restricted stock, convertible preferred stocks and warrants not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share (EPS) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 is a result of the Company’s net loss and, therefore, the effect of these instruments would be anti-dilutive.

14

Income Taxes 

Following are the components of the provision for income taxes for fiscal years ended:

  March 31,  March 25, 

(in thousands)

 

2018

  

2017

 
         
Current        

Federal

 $  $ 

State

  2   2 
   2   2 
Deferred        

Federal

  5,547   (496)

State

  (393)  (6)
   5,154   (502)
         

Change in liability for uncertain tax positions

  2   14 

Change in valuation allowance

  (5,156)  488 

Provision for income taxes

 $2  $2 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets are as follows:

 

Fiscal years ended (In thousands)

 

March 31,

2018

  

March 25,

2017

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 $11,472  $15,984 

Income tax credits

  347   323 

Inventory reserves and additional costs capitalized

  787   1,450 

Accrued vacation

  40   109 
Deferred rent  136    

Non-qualified stock options and restricted stock

  2   5 

Other

  77   146 

Total deferred tax assets

  12,861   18,017 
         

Valuation allowance

  (12,861)  (18,017)

Net deferred tax assets

 $  $ 

On December 22, 2017, the President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJ Act”), following its passage by the United States Congress. The TCJ Act provides for significant changes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that impact corporate taxation requirements, such as the reduction of the federal tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21% and changes or limitations to certain tax deductions. These changes are generally effective after December 31, 2017. If the taxable year includes the effective date of any rate changes, taxes should be calculated by applying a blended rate to the taxable income for the year. The Company’s taxable year runs from March 26, 2017 through March 31, 2018, therefore a blended corporate rate of 31.55% will apply to its 2017 Tax Year.

As a result of the enactment of the TCJ Act, the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured using the new corporate tax rate, resulting in a $5.2 million decrease in gross deferred tax assets with a corresponding decrease in the valuation allowance.

The following summarizes the difference between the income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rates of 31.55% and 34%, respectively, for the years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017, to income before income tax. The items comprising these differences consisted of the following for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017:

Fiscal years ended                
(In thousands except percentages) March 31, 2018  March 25, 2017 
Statutory federal income tax (benefit) $(955)  31.6% $(525)  34.0%

Valuation allowance

  (5,156)  170.1   488   (31.6)

Effect of reduced corporate tax rates

  6,207   (205.3)      

State income tax, net of federal benefit

  (177)  5.9   (90)  5.8 

Net operating loss expiration

        86   (5.6)

Non-tax deductible expenses

  46   (1.5)  77   (5.0)

Tax credits

  (4)  0.1   (40)  2.6 

Liability for uncertain tax positions

        14   (0.9)

Other

  41   (0.9)  (8)  0.5 

Effective income tax

 $2     $2   (0.2)%


The decrease in valuation allowance from March 25, 2017 to March 31, 2018 was $5,156,000.

As of March 31, 2018, the Company had pre-tax federal net operating loss carryforwards of $46,539,000 and state net operating loss carryforwards of $24,322,000 available to reduce future taxable income.  The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire from fiscal 2023 through 2038 and from 2028 through 2038, respectively.  Utilization of net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations due to certain ownership change limitations as required by Internal Revenue Code Section 382.  In addition, the TCJ Act imposes new limitations on the utilization of losses incurred in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The federal income tax credits begin to expire from 2032 through 2038 and state income tax credit carryforwards are carried forward indefinitely.

Schedule of senior secured convertible note        
Senior Secured Convertible Notes (4): March 31, 2023  January 11, 2023 
Fair Value (In thousands) $1,660  $1,803 
Face value principle payment (In thousands) $3,333  $3,333 
Face value at Premium (In thousands) $4,166  $4,166 
Conversion Price $0.25  $0.78 
Maturity Date  October 6, 2023   October 6, 2023 
Interest rate  6.00%  6.00%
Valuation technique  PWERM   PWERM 

 

The Company has recorded a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amountchange in the fair value of deferred tax assets, which may not be realized. The ultimate realizationthe Notes of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generation of future taxable$143,000 on March 31, 2023 in “Other income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers both positive and negative evidence and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.expense”.

 

AsWarrants

The Warrants entitle the holders to purchase a total of March 31, 2018,1,666,666 shares of common stock for a five-year period from issuance, at an exercise price determined as follows: (i) beginning on the issuance date and for a period of 90 days thereafter, $0.78, (ii) if the Uplist Transaction has occurred as of the date of exercise, the lower of (A) $0.78 and (B) 110% of the per share offering price to the public in the Uplist Transaction, and (iii) if neither of (i) and (ii) apply, the lower of (A) $0.78 and (B) 90% of the lowest VWAP for the 10 trading days prior to the date of the exercise, subject to adjustment including downward adjustment upon any dilutive issuance of securities. If the Uplist Transaction is not completed prior to the maturity date of the Notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the Warrants will be doubled, without an adjustment to the exercise price.

The Warrants are liability classified and the Company recorded unrecognized tax benefits of $122,000 related to uncertain tax positions. The unrecognized tax benefit is netted against the non-current deferred tax asset on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company has not recordedperformed a liability for any penalties or interest related to the unrecognized tax benefits.fair value analysis as shown below:

Schedule of warranty liability and fair value analysis        
Warrant liability, current: March 31, 2023  January 11, 2023 
Fair Value (In thousands) $734  $1,530 
Number of warrants $1,666,667  $1,666,667 
Closing price (OTCB: GIGA) $0.30  $0.80 
Volatility  143.30%  133.60%
Risk-free discount rate  3.60%  3.72%
Term  5 years   5 years 
Expiration date  January 11, 2028   January 11, 2028 
Valuation technique  Monte Carlo simulation   Monte Carlo simulation 

 

The Company files U.S federal and California state tax returns. The Company is generally no longer subject to tax examinations for years prior torecorded the fiscal year 2013 for federal purposes and fiscal year 2012 for California purposes, exceptchange in certain limited circumstances. The Company does have a California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) audit currently in process. The Company has worked with the FTB to resolve all audit issues and does not believe any material taxes or penalties are due. However,fair value of the warrants of $796,000 on March 31, 2023 as a resultgain in “Other income and expense”.

F-13

Placement Agent Warrant

Spartan Capital Securities, LLC (the “Placement Agent”) served as placement agent in the offering and received a cash commission in the amount of 8% of the ongoing examination,gross proceeds, or $240,000. In addition, we paid the Company eliminated certain income tax credit carryovers. The write-offPlacement Agent an expense allowance of these income tax credit carryovers had no impact on total income tax expense as$30,000. Furthermore, we issued the majority had an uncertain tax position reserve with the balance havingPlacement Agent five-year warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset.

A reconciliationnumber of the beginning and ending amount of the liability for uncertain tax positions, excluding potential interest and penalties, is as follows:

  Fiscal Years 

(In thousands)

 

2018

  

2017

 

Balance as of beginning of year

 $120  $106 

Additions based on current year tax positions

  2   14 

(Reductions) additions for prior year tax positions

      

Balance as of end of year

 $122  $120 

The total amount of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2018 is not material. The amount of tax benefits that would impact the effective rate, if recognized, is not expected to be material. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes with respect to unrecognized tax benefits within next twelve (12) months.

15

Share-based Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans

Share-based Compensation The Company has established the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, which provides for the granting of stock options and restricted stock for up to 2,850,000 shares of common stock at 100%equal to 8% of fair market value at the date of grant, with each grant requiring approval by the Board of Directors of the Company. In 2014, the term of the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan was extended to 2025. Options granted generally vest in one or more installments in a four or five year period and must be exercised while the grantee is employed by the Company or within a certain period after termination of employment. Options granted to employees shall not have terms in excess of 10 years from the grant date. Holders of options may be granted stock appreciation rights (SAR), which entitle them to surrender outstanding options for a cash distribution under certain changes in ownership of the Company, as defined in the stock option plan. As of March 31, 2018, no SAR’s have been granted under the option plan. As of March 31, 2018, the total number of shares of common stock availableunderlying the Notes and Warrants sold in the offering, or 1,200,000 shares. The Placement Agent Warrants have an exercise price of 110% of the Warrant exercise price. The Company performed a fair value analysis for issuance is 456,677. All outstanding options havethe 1,200,000 warrants similarly to the warrants analysis described above, and ascribed a ten-year life from the datefair value of grant.$858,000 as of January 11, 2023. The warrants are classified as equity:

Schedule of warranty liability and fair value analysis January 11, 2023 
Fair value (In thousands) $858 
Number of warrants  1,200,000 
Closing price (OTCB: GIGA) $0.80 
Volatility  133.6%
Risk-free discount rate  3.72%
Contractual term in years  5 years 
Expiration date  January 11, 2028 
Valuation technique  Monte Carlo simulation 

Note 14. Notes Payable

 


Notes payable at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, were comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of notes payable              
  Due date Interest
rate
  March 31, 2023  December 31,
2022
 
Bank credit    3.7%  1,580   1,623 
Other short-term notes payable    3.0%  417   425 
Financed receivables Cancelled January 10, 2023  8.5%     71 
Total notes payable        1,997   2,119 
Less: current portion        (1,715)  (1,797)
Notes payable - long-term portion       $282  $322 

 

Stock OptionsNote 15. Senior Secured Convertible Notes, Related Party

The following table summarizes the changes in the Senior secured convertible notes, related party for the three months ended March 31, 2023 (In thousands):

Summary of changes in the senior secured convertible notes, related party            
  Senior Secured  Senior Secured    
  Convertible
Note (2)
  Convertible Note
(3)
  Total 
Fair value at December 31, 2022 $3,940  $6,068  $10,008 
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes, related party  (223)  (343)  (566)
Balance at March 31, 2023 $3,717  $5,725  $9,442 

The change of $566,000 in the fair value of the Senior secured convertible notes as of March 31, 2023 compared to December 31, 2022 was recorded as a change in fair value of senior secured convertible notes and warrant liabilities within Other (expense) income on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.


The significant assumptions associated with the fair value of the Notes payable, related party as of the dates indicated, are as follows:

Schedule of assumptions associated with the fair value calculations of notes payable to related party        
  March 31, 2023  December 31, 2022 
Face value principle payment (In thousands) $11,133  $11,133 
Conversion Price $0.78  $0.78 
Maturity Date  December 31, 2024   December 31, 2024 
Interest rate  10.00%  10.00%
Discount rate  27.30%  27.30%
Valuation technique  PWERM   PWERM 
Fair Value (In thousands) $9,442  $10,008 

F-14

Note 16. Related Party Transactions

Allocation of General Corporate Expenses

AAI provided human resources, accounting, and other services to Gresham until September 8, 2022. Gresham obtained its business insurance under AAI’s policies. The accompanying financial statements of Gresham include allocations of these expenses. The allocation method calculates the appropriate share of overhead costs to Gresham by using Gresham’s revenue as a percentage of total revenue of AAI. Gresham believes the allocation methodology used is reasonable and has been consistently applied, and results in an appropriate allocation of costs incurred. However, these allocations may not be indicative of the cost that would have been incurred had Gresham been a stand-alone entity or of future costs. After the Business Combination on September 8, 2022, GIGA absorbed these costs and no expenses were allocated by AAI. AAI allocated $340,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands):

Schedule of related party transactions        
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022 
Related party transactions $  $340 

Net Transfers From AAI

 

The weighted average grant date fair valueCompany received funding from AAI to cover any shortfalls on operating cash requirements. In addition to the allocation of stock options granted duringgeneral corporate expenses, the fiscal yearsCompany received $0 and $177,000 from AAI for the quarters ended March 31, 20182023 and March 25, 2017 was $0.93 and $0.83, respectively, and was calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions:2022, respectively.

 

 

Fiscal years ended

 

March 31,

2018

  

March 25,

2017

 

Dividend yield

      

Expected volatility

  91%  99%

Risk-free interest rate

  2.40%  1.45%

Expected term (years)

  8.35   8.36 

Note 17. Stock-based Compensation

 

A summary of the changesThe stock-based compensation expense included in stock options outstandingnet loss for the fiscal yearsthree month period ended March 31, 20182023 and March 25, 2017 is presented below:2022 was $106,000 and $41,000, respectively recognized in general and administrative expenses.

      

Weighted

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

     

 

 

(Dollars in thousands except share prices)

 

 

 

Shares

  

Average

Exercise

Price per share

  

Contractual

Term

(Years)

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 

Outstanding at March 26, 2016

  1,592,200  $1.52   6.8  $69 

Granted

  148,000   0.97         

Exercised

              

Forfeited / Expired

  (635,700)  1.57         

Outstanding at March 25, 2017

  1,104,500  $1.41   6.1  $3 

Granted

  856,000   0.34   10.0     

Exercised

              

Forfeited / Expired

  (481,800)  1.34         

Outstanding at March 31, 2018

  1,478,700  $0.56   8.0  $ 
                 

Exercisable at March 31, 2018

  524,450  $0.81   4.8  $ 
                 

At March 31, 2018, expected to vest in the future

  671,805  $0.42   9.8  $ 

 

As of March 31, 2018,2023, there was $215,000$509,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options granted under the 2005 Plan and outside of the 2005 Plan. That cost isstock-based compensation arrangements expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.9 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. There were 143,900 and 272,500 options vested during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017, respectively. The total fair value of options vested during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 was $163,000 and $315,000, respectively. There were no exercises in fiscal 2018 and 2017. Share based compensation cost recognized in operating results for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 totaled $251,000 and $257,000, respectively.1.2 years.

 

Restricted StockNote 18. Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and trade receivables. Trade receivables of the Company and its subsidiaries are mainly derived from sales to customers located primarily in the U.S., Europe and Israel. The Company granted 586,950 restricted awards duringperforms ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and to date has not experienced any material losses. An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined with respect to those amounts that the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The Company granted 44,500 restricted awards during fiscal 2017. The restricted stock awards are considered fixed awards as the number of shares and fair value at the grant date are amortized over the requisite service period net of estimated forfeitures. As of March 31, 2018, there was $97,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards. That cost is expectedhave determined to be recognized over a weighted average perioddoubtful of 0.89 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. Compensation cost recognized for restricted and unrestricted stock for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 totaled $107,000 and $29,000, respectively.


A summary of the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards outstanding for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017 is presented below:

  

 

 

Shares

  

Weighted

Average Grant

Date Fair Value

 

Non-vested at March 26, 2016

    $ 

Granted

  44,500   0.66 

Vested

  (44,500)  0.66 

Forfeited or cancelled

      

Non-vested at March 25, 2017

    $ 

Granted

  586,950   0.66 

Vested

  (51,000)  (0.60)

Forfeited or cancelled

  (236,000)  (0.68)

Non-vested at March 31, 2018

  299,950  $0.65 

401(k) Plans The Company has established 401(k) plans which cover substantially all employees. Participants may make voluntary contributions to the plans for up to 100% of their defined compensation. The Company matches a percentage of the participant’s contributions in accordance with the plan. Participants vest ratably in Company contributions over a four- year period. Company contributions to the plans for fiscal 2018 and 2017 were approximately $27,000 and $33,000, respectively.

16

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company leased a 47,300 square foot facility located in San Ramon, California that expired in April 2017. On January 5, 2017, the Company entered a seventy-seven-month commercial building lease agreement for a 23,873 square feet facility in Dublin, California. The new lease began on April 1, 2017. The Company’s operations were in the Dublin facility as of March 31, 2018.collection.

 

The Company also leases certain other equipment under operating leases.following table provides the percentage of total revenues attributable to a single customer from which 10% or more of total revenues are derived:

Percentage of total revenues attributable to single customer from which 10% or more of total revenues                
  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
Segment March 31,
2023
  % of
Total
Revenue
  March 31,
2022
  % of
Total
Revenue
 
Customer A $2,068   24% $2,505   35%
Customer B $1,052   12% $   %
Customer C $872   10% $760   10.0%

F-15

 

Total future minimum lease payments under the new building lease and certain equipment are as follows.

Fiscal year (Dollars in thousands)    
2019 $436 
2020  450 
2021  464 
2022  472 
Thereafter  696 
Total $2,518 

The aggregate rental expense was $460,000 and $523,000 in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.Note 19. Net Loss Per Share

 

The Company leases certain equipment under capital leases that expire through May 2021. Capital leases with costs totaling $249,000 and $249,000 are reportedBasic net of accumulated depreciation of $174,000 and $113,000 at March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017, respectively.

Total future minimum lease payments under these capital leases are as follows.

Fiscal year (Dollars in thousands)

 

Principal

  

Interest

  

Total

 

2019

 $52  $12  $64 

2020

  40   5   45 

2021

  22   1   23 

Total

 $114  $18  $132 

The Company is committed to purchase certain inventory under non-cancelable purchase orders. As of March 31, 2018, total non–cancelable purchase orders were approximately $1,260,000 and are scheduled to be delivered to the Company at various dates through March 2019.


17

Warranty Obligations

The Company records a liability in cost of sales for estimated warranty obligations at the date products are sold. Adjustments are made as new information becomes available. The following provides a reconciliation of changes in the Company’s warranty reserve. The Company provides no other guarantees.

 

(In thousands)

 

March 31,

2018

  

March 25,

2017

 

Balance as of beginning of year

 $123  $60 

Provision, net

  291   234 

Warranty costs incurred

  (250)  (171)

Balance as of end of year

 $164  $123 

18

Private Placement Offering

On January 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of 2,787,872 Units, each consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.75 shares of common stock, to approximately 20 private investors. The purchase price for each Unit was $1.24375. Gross proceeds were approximately $3.5 million. Net proceeds to the Company after fees was approximately $3.1 million. The portion of the purchase price attributable to the common shares included in each Unit was $1.15, the consolidated closing bid price for the Company’s common stock on January 15, 2016. The warrant price was $.09375 per Unit (equivalent to $0.125 per whole warrant share), with an exercise price of $1.15 per share. The term of the warrants is five years from the date of completion of the transaction. Emerging Growth Equities, Ltd also received warrants to purchase 292,727 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.15loss per share as part of its consideration for serving as placement agent in connection with the private placement.

19

Preferred Stock and Warrants

Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock

On March 26, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of 43,800 shares of a newly designated series of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series E Shares”) to approximately 15 private investors. The sale was completed and the Series E Shares were issued on March 28, 2018.

The purchase price for each Series E Share was $25.00. Gross proceeds receivedis computed by the Company were approximately $1.095 million (the “Placement”). Net proceeds to the Company after fees and expenses of the Placement were approximately $1.0 million. Placement agent fees incurred in connection with the transaction were 5% of gross proceeds or approximately $57,000 in cash, plus warrants to purchase 5% of thedividing net loss by weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (excluding outstanding stock options). Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the potential effect of dilutive securities which are convertible into common shares (using the treasury stock method), except in cases in which the Series Eeffect would be anti-dilutive. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share:

Schedule of earnings per share, basic and diluted        
(In thousands except share data) Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022 
Numerator      
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(2,464) $(497)
Denominator        
Basic weighted average shares outstanding  5,932   2,920 
Effect of dilutive securities      
Diluted weighted-average shares  5,932   2,920 
         
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted $(0.42) $(0.17)

For the three month periods ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, because the Company was in a loss position, basic net loss per share is the same as diluted net loss per share as the inclusion of the potential common shares can be converted (223,000 shares) at an exercise price of $0.25 per share.would have been anti-dilutive.

 

Each Series E Share is initially convertible (at the option of the holder) at a conversion price of $0.25 per share of common stock, representing 100 shares of the Company’s common stock per each Series E Share. The conversion ratio is subject to adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar transactions. As of March 31, 2018, if all 43,800 issued Series E Shares were immediately converted, holders of such shares would acquire 4,380,000 shares of common stock of the Company, or 31% of the pro forma number offollowing table sets forth potential shares of common stock that are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation above because to do so would be outstanding ifanti-dilutive for the conversion had occurred on this date, 27% ofperiods indicated:

Schedule of antidilutive securities        
Anti-dilutive securities March 31, 2023  March 31, 2022 
Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options  789   500 
Common shares issuable on conversion of series F preferred stock  3,960   3,960 
Common shares issuable upon exercise of warrants  6,833    
Restricted stock awards  250   250 
Common shares issuable upon conversion of senior secured convertible notes  27,590    
Total  39,422   4,710 

Note 20. Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, the pro forma number of shares of common stock that would be outstanding upon the conversion of the Company’s outstanding shares of Series B, Series C and Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (collectively, the “Previously Issued Preferred Shares”) and 22% of the pro forma number of shares of common stock that would be outstanding if all shares of preferred stock were converted and all warrants exercised as of this date. The Company is entitled to redeem Series E Shares at a price equal to 300% of the Series E Share purchase price, or $75.00 per share, subject to potential adjustment, but the right to redeem is subject to satisfactionvarious claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of certain conditionsbusiness. The Company accrues for losses related to litigation when a potential loss is probable, and the market priceloss can be reasonably estimated. As of March 31, 2023, the Company was not party to any material legal proceedings for which a loss was probable or an amount was accrued.

As of March 31, 2023 and trading volume2022, Enertec’s guarantees balance from Hapoalim bank was $3.8 million and $4.2 million, respectively for project implementation fees which are released upon delivery of the Company’s common stock.project products to the customer.

 

Each Series E Share has a liquidation preference of 150% of the purchase price or $37.50, subject to adjustment. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, a merger, or a sale of the Company’s MSI business line or Simulation and Electronics Warfare business line or their related assets, before any payment or distribution to holders of junior shares (including common stock and Previously Issued Preferred Stock), holders of Series E Shares will be entitled to receive an amount of cash per share of Series E Shares up to the liquidation preference plus all accumulated accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. Upon a sale of the Company’s MSI business line or Simulation and Electronics Warfare business line or their related assets, holders of Series E Shares shall be entitled to receive a pro rata portion of the net sale proceeds after reasonable transaction expenses and amount payable to the Company’s secured creditors for releases of their liens on such assets, up to the liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends. If the payment per Series E Shares is less than the Series E Shares’ liquidation preference, the liquidation preference and the Series E Share redemption price will be reduced by the amount of the payment received.


Holders of Series E Shares are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, cumulative preferential dividends, payable semiannual in cash at a rate per annum equal to 6.0% of the initial purchase price of $25.00 per share or in-kind (at the Company’s election) through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, based on the 10 day volume weighted average price of the common stock.

Holders of Series E Shares generally vote together with the common stock on an as-converted basis on each matter submitted to the vote or approval of the holders of common stock, and vote as a separate class with respect to certain actions that adversely affect the rights of the holders of Series E Shares and on other matters as required by law. In addition, the approval of the Holders of the Series E shares is generally required prior to the Company’s issuance of any securities having rights senior to or in parity with the Series E Shares with respect to dividends or liquidation preferences. The Series E Shares’ right to approve parity securities will terminate at such time that (1) fewer than 22,300 Series E Shares, which is 50% of the number of Series E Shares first issued, remain outstanding or (2) the volume weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock for any 20 trading days within any 30 trading day period is $0.75 or more, the average daily trading volume over such 30 trading day period is 100,000 shares or more and there is either an effective registration statement covering resale of the shares of common stock that holders of Series E Shares would be entitled to receive upon conversion and any shares received as pay-in-kind dividends, or such share could be freely sold pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.Note 21. Segment Information

 

The Company has three reportable segments as of March 31, 2023. Prior to the Acquisition, GWW operated as two operating segments but aggregated its results into one reportable segment based on similarity in economic characteristics, other qualitative factors and each Series E investor entered into an Investor Rights Agreement. Under this agreement, the Company agreed to, amongobjectives and principals of Accounting Standards Codification 280, Segment Reporting.

F-16

The following data presents the revenues, expenditures and other things, use best efforts to file certain registration statementsoperating data of the Company’s operating segments for the resale of common stockthree months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 (In thousands):

Schedule of revenues, expenditures and other operating data of company's operating segments                                
  Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2023  Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2022 
Description Precision
Electronic
Solutions
  Power
Electronics
& Displays
  RF
Solutions
  Total  Precision
Electronic
Solutions
  Power
Electronics
& Displays
  RF Solutions  Total 
Revenue $3,941  $2,991  $1,791  $8,723  $3,254  $2,479  $1,511  $7,244 
Cost of revenue  3,210   2,112   1,238   6,560   2,316   1,594   842   4,751 
Gross profit  730   879   554   2,163   939   886   669   2,493 
Operating expenses  2,791   1,682   1,481   5,954   1,117   1,028   839   2,984 
Other income (expense), net and income tax benefit (provision)  (560)  (587)  (187)  (1,334)  26   (15)  8   19 
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes $(1,502) $(215) $(740) $(2,457) $(203) $(128) $(178) $(510)
Assets (at period end) $19,402  $8,697  $10,652  $38,751  $17,206  $7,564  $9,781  $34,550 

Note 22. Consolidated Proforma Unaudited Financial Statements

The following unaudited proforma combined financial information is based on the historical financial statements of the Company thatand Giga-tronics and subsidiaries after giving effect to the investor may acquire upon conversionCompany’s acquisition of the Series E Shares and may potentially receivecompanies as payment-in-kind dividends duringif the two years following the date of the agreement. The Company also agreed that it would not issue additional debt without the approval by holders of at least 66.6% of the Series E Shares, other than trade debt incurred in the normal course and commercial bank working capital debt, whether revolving or term debt. Concurrent with the execution of the Securities Purchase Agreement for the Series E Shares, the Company and PFG entered into a modification agreement providing for the restructuring of certain terms associated with approximately $1.7 million in indebtedness owed to PFG (see Note 8 – Term Loans, Revolving Line of Credit and Warrants).

In connection with the sale of Series E Shares, the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of certain warrants issued in connection with the Company’s private placement inacquisition occurred on January 2016 (see Note 18 – Private Placement Offering), in which the Company sold (in part) 2,787,872 warrants (a “2016 Warrant”). Each 2016 Warrant entitled the holder to purchase 0.75 shares of the Company’s common stock at the price of $1.15 per whole share. The Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of 2016 Warrants that are held by the 2016 Investors purchasing Series E Shares from $1.15 to $0.25 per share as follows: A 2016 Investor purchasing an amount equal to or exceeding the lesser of $200,000 or 50% of the amount it invested in the 2016 Private Placement will have the exercise price of all of its 2016 Warrants reduced to $0.25, and 2016 Investors purchasing less than the lesser of $200,000 or 50% of the amount it invested in the January 2016 Private Placement will have the exercise price of a ratable percentage of the 2016 Warrants reduced to $0.25. In connection with its sale of the Series E Shares, the Company reduced the exercise price of 1,759,268 of the outstanding 2016 Warrants to $0.25.1, 2022.

 

The fair value attributablefollowing unaudited proforma information does not purport to re-pricingpresent what the 2016 Warrants, provided toCompany’s actual results would have been had the participating 2016 Investors, of approximately $203,000, was deducted fromacquisition occurred on January 1, 2022, nor is the Series E gross proceeds to arrive at the initial discounted carrying valuefinancial information indicative of the Series E Shares.results of future operations. The initial discounted carrying value resulted in recognition of a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $557,000, further reducing the initial carrying value of the Series E Shares. The discount to the aggregate stated value of the Series E Shares, resulting from recognition of the beneficial conversion feature, was immediately accreted as a reduction of common stock and an increase in the carrying value of the Series E Shares. The accretion is presented as a deemed dividend in the consolidated statements of operations.

In addition, warrants to purchase 292,727 shares of common stock held by the placement agent, as a result of a prior transaction, were amended to reduce the exercise price from $1.15 per share to $0.25 per share. The fair value attributable to re-pricing the placement agent warrants of approximately $53,000 was recognized as additional Series E issuance costs and recognized net in the carrying value of Series E Shares.


Series B, C, D Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock and Warrants

On November 10, 2011, the Company received $2,199,000 in cash proceeds from Alara Capital AVI II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Investor”), an investment vehicle sponsored by Active Value Investors, LLC, under a Securities Purchase Agreement entered into on October 31, 2011. Under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 9,997 shares of its Series B Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”) to the Investor at a price of $220 per share. The Company has recorded $2.0 million as Series B Preferred Stock on the consolidated balance sheet which is net of stock offering costs of approximately $202,000 andfollowing table represents the value attributable to both the convertible preferred stock and warrants issued to the Investor. After considering the valueunaudited consolidated proforma results of the warrants, the effective conversion price of the preferred stock was greater than the common stock price on date of issue and therefore no beneficial conversion feature was present.

On February 19, 2013, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell 3,424.65 shares of its Series C Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”) to the Investor, for aggregate consideration of $500,000, which is approximately $146.00 per share. The Company has recorded $457,000 as Series C Preferred Stock on the consolidated balance sheet, which is net of stock offering costs of approximately $43,000. As part of this transaction, the Company and the Investor agreed to reduce the number of shares exercisable under the previously issued warrant, and after considering the reduction in the value of the warrant, the effective conversion price of the preferred stock was greater than the common stock price on the date of issue and therefore no beneficial conversion feature was present.

On July 8, 2013 the Company received $817,000 in net cash proceeds from the Investor under a Securities Purchase Agreement. The Company sold to the Investor 5,111.86 shares of its Series D Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (Series D Preferred Stock) and a warrant to purchase up to 511,186 additional shares of common stock at the price of $1.43 per share. The allocation of the $858,000 in gross proceeds from issuance of Series D Preferred Stock based on the relative fair values resulted in an allocation of $498,000 (which was recorded net of $41,000 of issuance costs) to Series D Preferred Stock and $360,000 to Common Stock. In addition, because the effective conversion rate based on the $498,000 allocated to Series D Preferred Stock was $0.97 per common share which was less than the Company’s stock price on the date of issuance, a beneficial conversion feature was present at the issuance date. The beneficial conversion feature totaled $238,000 and was recorded as a reduction of common stock and an increase to accumulated deficit.

Each share of Series B, Series C and Series D Preferred Stock is convertible into one hundred shares of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the preferred stock issuance described above, the Company issued to the investor warrants to purchase a total of 1,017,405 common shares at an exercise price of $1.43 per share. These warrants were exercised in February 2015, and May 2015. The Company received funds from Alara in separate closings dated February 16, 2015 and February 23, 2015. Alara exercised a total of 1,002,818 of its existing Series C and Series D warrants to purchase common shares, all of which had an exercise price of $1.43 per share for total cash proceeds of $1,434,000, which was recorded net of $42,000 of stock issuance costs. As part of the consideration for this exercise, the Company sold to Alara two new warrants to purchase an additional 898,634 and 194,437 common shares at an exercise price of $1.78 and $1.76 per share, respectively, for a total purchase price of $137,000 or $0.125 per share. The new warrants have a term of five years and may be paid in cash or through a cashless net share settlement. The Company and Alara amended the remaining 14,587 warrants as part of the February closings. On May 14, 2015, Alara exercised the remaining 14,587 warrants by acquiring 7,216 of shares of the Company’s common stock through a cashless net share settlement.

The table below presents informationoperations for the fiscal yearsthree months ended March 31, 20182023 and March 25, 2017:31, 2022, as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2022.

Summary of unaudited pro forma financial information                
Proforma, unaudited (In thousands) Gresham          
Three months ended March 31, 2023 Worldwide,
Inc.
  Giga-tronics  Proforma
Adjustments
  Proforma
Unaudited
 
Net Sales $8,293  $430  $  $8,723 
Cost of Sales  5,880   680      6,560 
Operating expenses  4,284   1,670      5,954 
Other income (expense)  807   527      1,334 
Income tax benefit  7         7 
Net gain attributable to non-controlling interest  14         14 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(1,070) $(1,394) $  $(2,464)

                 
Proforma, unaudited (In thousands) Gresham          
Three months ended March 31, 2022 Worldwide,
Inc.
  Giga-tronics  Proforma
Adjustments
  Proforma
Unaudited
 
Net Sales $7,244  $1,436  $  $8,680 
Cost of Sales  4,751   1,036      5,787 
Operating expenses  2,984   1,555      4,539 
Other income (expense)  (19)  (17)     (36)
Income tax provision            
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest  (13)        (13)
Deemed dividend on Series E preferred stock     (2)      (2)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(497) $(1,174) $  $(1,671)

 

Preferred Stock

                
                 

As of March 31, 2018 and March 25, 2017

                
                 
  

 

Designated

  

 

Shares

  

 

Shares

  

Liquidation Preference

 
  

Shares

  

Issued

  

Outstanding

  

(in thousands)

 

Series B

  10,000.00   9,997.00   9,997.00  $2,309 

Series C

  3,500.00   3,424.65   3,424.65   500 

Series D

  6,000.00   5,111.86   5,111.86   731 

Total at March 25, 2017

  19,500.00   18,533.51   18,533.51   3,540 
Series E  60,000.00   43,800.00   43,800.00   1,643 
Total at March 31, 2018  79,500.00   62,333.51   62,333.51  $5,183 

Note 23. Subsequent Events

 

AULT provided payments totaling $774,077, from April 1, 2023 through June 26, 2023 on account of receivables, related party.

Related party loans of $100,000 with zero percent interest and no due date were issued in May 2023.

F-17

20

Subsequent Events

Table of Contents

 

During April 2018, the Company issued an additional 6,000 shares of Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $25.00 per share for total gross proceeds of $150,000.REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

During May 2018,To the Company issued an additional 2,400 shares of Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $25.00 per share for total gross proceeds of $60,000.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TheShareholders and Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Giga-tronics Incorporated

Dublin, California and Subsidiaries

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Giga-tronics Incorporated and subsidiarySubsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of MarchDecember 31, 2018,2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations shareholders'and comprehensive loss, statements of changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the year thentwo years in the period ended December 31, 2022 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"“financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2018,December 331, 2022 and 2021, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the year thentwo years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America. 

 

The Company's AbilityWe did not audit the December 31, 2022 and 2021 financial statements of Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary, which statements reflect 39% and 46% of the total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and 41% and 43% of the total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to Continueus, and our opinion, insofar as ait relates to the amounts included for Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd., is based solely on the report of other auditors.

Explanatory Paragraph – Going Concern

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussedmore fully described in Note 2, to the consolidated financial statements, the Company'sCompany has incurred significant recurring losses and accumulated deficitneeds to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about itsthe Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit.audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. We determined that there are no critical audit matters. 

/s/ Marcum llp 

Marcum llp

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.

New York, New York 

May 11, 2023

F-18

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors and Management of Enertec systems 2001 Ltd. 

Karmiel, Israel.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the statements of financial position of Enertec systems 2001 Ltd. ("the Company") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related statements of comprehensive profit /(loss), changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements (not presented herein)). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our auditaudits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our auditaudits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2018.

/s/ArmaninoLLP
San Ramon, California

June 19, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Giga-tronics Incorporated

Dublin, California

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Giga-tronics Incorporated (the "Company") as of March 25, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended March 25, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 25, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended March 25, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our auditaudits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Estimation of total contract costs to be incurred for fixed-price long-term contract revenue

As described in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company recognizes a significant portion of its revenue over time using the cost-to-cost measure of progress, which measures a contract’s progress toward completion based on the ratio of actual contract costs incurred to date to the Company’s estimated costs at completion. The cost estimation process for these contracts is based on the knowledge and experience of the Company’s project managers, engineers, and financial professionals. Changes in job performance, job conditions and management’s assessment of expected variable consideration are factors that influence estimates of the total contract transaction price, total costs to complete those contracts and the Company’s revenue recognition. 

 /s/ Crowe Horwath LLPF-19

We identified estimated costs to complete on certain revenue contracts as a critical audit matter. The determination of the total estimated cost and progress toward completion requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions. Total estimated costs to complete projects include various costs such as direct labor, material, and subcontract costs. Changes in these estimates can have a significant impact on the revenue recognized each period. Auditing these estimates involved especially challenging auditor judgment in evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assumptions and estimates over the duration of these contracts.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

•Examining a sample of revenue contracts to evaluate the appropriateness of the Company’s identification of performance obligations and the determination of method for measuring contract progress.

•Assessing the reasonableness of the estimated costs to complete by selecting a sample of open projects and (i) testing consistency of the estimated total contract costs projected in the current year versus the original or prior period, (ii) assessing the status of completion by testing of a sample of project costs incurred to date and interviewing the Company’s management to evaluate progress to date, the estimate of remaining costs to be incurred, and factors impacting the amount of time and cost to complete.

•Assessing the reasonableness of changes in estimated costs to complete by comparing project profitability estimates in the current period to historical estimates and actual performance and investigating reasons for changes in expected costs and project margins.

•Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s budgeting process by selecting a sample of contract budgets for projects that were completed during the period and performing a retrospective review of budget to actual variances.

/S/ Ziv Haft.

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

BDO Member Firm

 

 

We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor from 2005 to January 4, 2018.since 2012.

Tel-Aviv, Israel

 

San Francisco,April 17, 2023, except for footnote 17 which is dated May 11, 2023

F-20

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands except share data)

         
  December 31,
2022
  December 31,
2021
 
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $2,195  $1,599 
Accounts receivable, net  5,502   4,554 
Accrued revenue  2,479   2,283 
Receivable, related party  1,242    
Inventories, net  7,695   4,206 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  625   890 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS  19,738   13,532 
         
Intangible assets, net  3,476   4,035 
Goodwill  9,054   9,812 
Property and equipment, net  2,240   2,052 
Right-of-use assets  3,940   4,333 
Other assets  506   141 
TOTAL ASSETS $38,954  $33,905 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $6,913  $4,125 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses, related party     53 
Notes payable  1,797   961 
Operating lease liability, current  1,067   659 
Other current liabilities  4,254   1,895 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES  14,031   7,693 
         
LONG TERM LIABILITIES        
Operating lease liability, non-current  3,014   3,712 
Notes payable  322    
Notes payable, related party  10,008    
Other liabilities  238    
TOTAL LIABILITIES  27,613   11,405 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Preferred stock; no par value; Authorized - 1,000,000 shares        
Series A Preferred Stock, 250,000 shares authorized; Nil 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021      
Series F Preferred Stock, 520 shares designated; 514.8 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021  4,990   4,990 
Common Stock; no par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 5,931,582 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022; 13,333,333 shares authorized, 2,920,085 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021  35,141   26,682 
Accumulated deficit  (27,726)  (9,988)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (1,779)  (240)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY  10,626   21,444 
         
Non-controlling interest  715   1,056 
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY  11,341   22,500 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $38,954  $33,905 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-21

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSANDCOMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands except per share data)

         
  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2022  2021 
Revenues $30,255  $25,580 
Cost of revenues  21,780   17,231 
Gross profit  8,475   8,349 
Operating expenses        
Research and development  2,137   1,537 
Selling and marketing  1,712   1,066 
General and administrative  10,543   8,737 
Impairment of goodwill  10,459    
Total operating expenses  24,851   11,340 
         
Loss from continuing operations  (16,376)  (2,991)
Other (expense) income        
Interest expense, related party  (482)  (408)
Interest expense  (739)  (240)
Change in fair value of marketable equity securities     (866)
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible note  (1,092)   
Foreign currency exchange adjustment  45    
Realized gain on marketable equity securities     1,263 
Gain on extinguishment of debt     447 
Other income (expense)  103   125 
Total other (expense) income, net  (2,165)  321 
         
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (18,541)  (2,670)
Income tax benefit (provision)  123   (193)
Net loss  (18,418)  (2,863)
Net (loss) gain attributable to non-controlling interest  680   (243)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(17,738) $(3,106)
         
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted $(3.20) $(1.06)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted  5,552   2,920 
         
Comprehensive (loss) income        
Loss available to common stockholders  (17,738)  (3,106)
Foreign currency translation adjustments  (1,539)  87 
Total comprehensive loss $(19,277) $(3,019)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-22

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERSEQUITY

(In thousands except share data)

                                 
           Accumulated
Other
  Non-  Total 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Accumulated  Comprehensive  Controlling  Stockholder's 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Deficit  Loss  Interest  Equity 
Balance at January 1, 2021  515  $4,990   2,920,085  $19,915  $(6,882) $(327) $813  $18,509 
Stock-based compensation           629            629 
Capital contribution from parent           6,138            6,138 
Net loss              (3,106)        (3,106)
Foreign currency translation adjustments                 87      87 
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest                    243   243 
Balance at December 31, 2021  515   4,990   2,920,085   26,682   (9,988)  (240)  1,056   22,500 
Stock-based compensation           605            605 
Capital contribution from parent           1,570            1,570 
Shares acquired in reverse capitalization        2,782,229   4,404            4,404 
Gain on extinguishment of related party debt              1,544               1,544 
Warrant issued in exchange of related party debt              682               682 
Common stock issued on warrant exercise        229,268                
Net loss              (17,738)        (17,738)
Foreign currency translation adjustments                 (1,539)  (7)  (1,546)
Increase in Microphase ownership           (346)        346    
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest                    (680)  (680)
Balance at December 31, 2022  515  $4,990   5,931,582  $35,141  $(27,726) $(1,779) $715  $11,341 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-23

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

         
  For the Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss $(18,418) $(2,863)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation  663   500 
Impairment of goodwill  10,459    
Amortization of intangibles  308   375 
Amortization of right-of-use assets  588   436 
Gain on extinguishment of debt     (447)
Change in fair value of senior secured convertible note  1,357    
Increase in capital contribution from parent for corporate overhead  1,090   1,390 
Stock-based compensation  605   629 
Realized gains on sale of marketable securities     (1,263)
Unrealized losses on marketable equity securities     866 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (867)  (1,434)
Accounts receivables, related parties  (5)   
Accrued revenue  (98)  (473)
Inventories  (1,209)  (1,082)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  156   (325)
Other assets  31   (76)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  289   398 
Accounts payable, related parties  23   17 
Other current liabilities  601   330 
Lease liabilities  (607)  (135)
Net cash used in operating activities  (5,034)  (3,157)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (638)  (949)
Acquisition of GIGA, net of cash received  (3,687)   
Sales of marketable equity securities     1,467 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (4,325)  518 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Capital contribution from parent  480   4,748 
Proceeds from notes payable, related party  9,617    
Proceeds from notes payable  1,198    
Payments on notes payable     (455)
Payments on notes payable, related party     (239)
Payments on revolving credit facilities, net  (1,616)  (660)
Net cash provided by financing activities  9,679   3,394 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash  276   (346)
Net increase in cash  596   409 
Cash  at beginning of period  1,599   1,190 
Cash  at end of period $2,195  $1,599 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid during the period for interest $739  $49 
Cash paid during the period for income tax $  $ 
         
Non-cash investing and financing activities        
Gain on extinguishment of related party debt $1,544  $ 
Warrants issued in exchange of related party debt $682  $ 
Shares acquired in reverse capitalization $4,404  $ 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-24

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Description of Business

Giga-tronics Incorporated (“GIGA”) through its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), designs, manufactures, and distributes specialized electronics equipment, automated test solutions, power electronics, supply and distribution solutions, and radio, microwave and millimeter wave communication systems and components for a variety of applications with a focus on the global defense industry. GIGA also offers bespoke technology solutions for mission critical applications in the medical, industrial, transportation and telecommunications markets.

GIGA is a California corporation incorporated on March 5, 1980. GIGA has two subsidiaries Microsource Inc. (“Microsource”) and Gresham Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Gresham Worldwide, Inc.) (“GWW”). GIGA’s manages its acquired operations through its wholly owned subsidiary GWW. GIGA is a majority owned subsidiary of Ault Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ault” or “Parent”) and currently operates as an operating segment of Ault. GWW has three wholly-owned subsidiaries, Gresham Power Electronics Ltd. (“Gresham Power”), Relec Electronics Ltd. (“Relec”), and Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd. (“Enertec”), and one majority owned subsidiary, Microphase Corporation (“Microphase”). GIGA manufactures specialized electronic equipment for use in military test and airborne operational applications. Our operations consist of three business segments:

•RF Solutions – consists of Microphase located in Connecticut. Microphase designs and manufactures custom microwave products for military applications and generate revenue mostly through sole-source production contracts for custom engineered components and RADAR filters.

•Power Electronics & Displays - consists of two subsidiaries, namely Gresham Power and Relec located in the United Kingdom which primarily produce power conversion systems

•Precision Electronic Solutions – consists of one subsidiary and one division, namely Enertec located in Israel and the Giga-tronics Division including Microsource located in California and New Hampshire primarily producing test systems and RF filters for the defense industries.

Recapitalization and Reorganization

On September 8, 2022 (the “Closing Date”), GIGA acquired 100% of the capital stock of GWW from Ault in exchange for 2,920,085 shares of GIGA’s common stock and 514.8 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series F”) that are convertible into an aggregate of 3,960,043 shares of GIGA’s common stock (the "Acquisition"). The parties had previously entered into a Share Exchange Agreement dated December 27, 2021 (the “Agreement”) but as a California corporation, GIGA required shareholder approval which occurred on September 8, 2022. GIGA also assumed GWW’s outstanding equity awards representing the right to receive up to 749,626 shares of GIGA’s common stock, on an as-converted basis. The transaction described above resulted in a change of control of GIGA. Assuming Ault were to convert all of the Series F, the common stock issuable to Ault would be approximately 69.6% of outstanding shares. Immediately following the above transaction, GWW became wholly owned subsidiary of GIGA and GIGA became a majority-owned subsidiary of Ault. GIGA’s outstanding shares of Common Stock and outstanding warrants and options to purchase Common Stock remain outstanding and unaffected upon completion of the Acquisition. The historical financial statements, outstanding shares and all other historical share information have been adjusted by multiplying the respective share amount by the exchange ratio as noted in the Agreement if the exchange ratio had been in effect for all periods presented.

Note 2. Going Concern and Management’s Plan

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred recurring net losses and operations have not provided cash flows. In view of these matters, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely through the sale of equity securities with some additional funding from other sources, including term notes until such time as funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. 

Our primary sources of liquidity has historically been funding by our parent company Ault. The extent of continued support from Ault is not assured as we seek additional financing from third parties. There is substantial doubt that we will have sufficient cash to meet our needs over the next 12 months. Our ability to obtain additional financing is subject to several factors, including market and economic conditions, our performance and investor and lender sentiment with respect to us and our industry. If we are unable to raise additional financing in the near term as needed, our operations and production plans may be scaled back or curtailed and our operations and growth would be impeded.

Our near term fixed commitments for cash expenditures are primarily for payments for employee salaries, operating leases, accounts payables, and inventory purchase commitments.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $2.2 million and working capital of $5.8 million but has had recurring net losses and is not expected to have continued support from Ault to fund operating expenses. Management made plans to increase revenue, reduce costs, and raise needed capital, however there can be no assurance that we can successfully implement these plans. As a result, the Company may be forced to scale back its operations or cease operations altogether.

F-25

Note 3. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Principles of Consolidation

The Acquisition is accounted for as a reverse recapitalization with GWW being the accounting acquirer and GIGA being the acquired company for accounting purposes. All historical financial information presented in the consolidated financial statements represents the accounts of GWW and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements after completion of the Acquisition will include the assets and liabilities and operations of GIGA and its subsidiaries from the Closing Date of the Acquisition. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The shares and net loss per common share prior to the merger have been retroactively restated as shares reflecting the exchange ratio established in the merger.

Change in Fiscal Year

As a result of the Acquisition, the Company changed our fiscal year-end from March 25, 2023 to December 31, 2022, effective September 8, 2022.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions. The Company’s management believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions used are reasonable based upon information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Key estimates include valuations of the assets and liabilities acquired in the business combination, valuation of convertible notes, reserves for inventories, accruals of certain liabilities, useful lives and the recoverability of long-lived assets and impairment analysis of goodwill.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the current-year financial statement presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations. The impact on any prior period disclosures was immaterial. 

Significant Accounting Policies

Business Combinations

The Company allocates the purchase price of an acquired business to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Acquired customer relations, developed technology and tradenames are recognized at fair value. The purchase price allocation process requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions as of the acquisition date with respect to intangible assets. The allocation of the consideration transferred in certain cases may be subject to revision based on the final determination of fair values during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date. The Company includes the results of operations of the business that it has acquired in its consolidated results prospectively from date of acquisition. Direct transaction costs associated with the business combination are expensed as incurred.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (”FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Codification (”ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). The core principle of ASC 606 is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle:

•Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer,

•Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract,

•Step 3: Determine the transaction price,

•Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and

•Step 5: Recognize revenue when the company satisfies a performance obligation.

F-26

Sales of Products

The Company enters into contracts directly with its customers and generates revenues from the sale of its products through a direct and indirect sales force. The Company’s performance obligations to deliver products are satisfied at the point in time when products are received by the customer, which is when the customer obtains control over the goods. The Company provides standard assurance warranties, which are not separately priced, that the products function as intended. The Company primarily receives fixed consideration for sales of product. Some of the Company’s contracts with distributors include stock rotation rights after six months for slow moving inventory, which represents variable consideration. The Company uses an expected value method to estimate variable consideration and constrains revenue for estimated stock rotations until it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. To date, returns have been insignificant.

Because the Company’s product sales agreements have an expected duration of one year or less, the Company has elected to adopt the practical expedient in ASC606-10-50-14(a) of not disclosing information about its remaining performance obligations.

Manufacturing Services

The Company’s principal business is providing manufacturing services in exchange primarily for fixed fees. For manufacturing services, which include revenues generated by Enertec, Microsource and Microphase and in certain instances revenues generated by Gresham Power, the Company’s performance obligation for manufacturing services is satisfied over time as the Company creates or enhances an asset based on criteria that are unique to the customer and that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced. Generally, the Company recognizes revenue based upon proportional performance over time using a cost-to-cost method which measures progress based on the costs incurred to total expected costs in satisfying its performance obligation. This method provides a depiction of the progress in providing the manufacturing service because there is a direct relationship between the costs incurred by the Company and the transfer of the manufacturing service to the customer. Manufacturing services are recognized based upon the proportional performance method as services transferred over time and to the extent the customer has not been invoiced for these revenues, as accrued revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Revisions to the Company’s estimates may result in increases or decreases to revenues and income and are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the periods in which they are first identified.

The Company has elected the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-50-14(a) to not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component to the extent that the period between when the Company transfers its promised good or service to the customer and when the customer pays in one year or less.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company’s receivables are recorded when billed and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash. The carrying amount of the Company’s receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, represents their estimated net realizable value. The Company individually reviews all accounts receivable balances and based upon an assessment of current creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical collection trends, age of outstanding receivables and existing economic conditions. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that a specific receivable balance may be impaired, further consideration is given to the collectability of those balances and the allowance is adjusted accordingly. A customer’s receivable balance is considered past-due based on its contractual terms. Past-due receivable balances are written-off when the Company’s internal collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting the amount due. 

Based on an assessment of the collectability of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, an allowance was provided for doubtful accounts of $64,000 and $54,000, respectively.

Accrued Revenue

Manufacturing services that are recognized as revenue based upon the proportional performance method are considered revenue based on services transferred over time and to the extent the customer has not been invoiced for these revenues, are recorded as accrued revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. 

As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, accrued revenue was $2.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

Fair value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with ASC No. 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received for the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date.

The guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs include those that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. The guidance establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

F-27

Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or model-derived valuations. All significant inputs used in our valuations are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs also include quoted prices that were adjusted for security-specific restrictions which are compared to output from internally developed models such as a discounted cash flow model.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments carried at cost, including cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivables, approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturities of such instruments. The categorization of a financial instrument within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. 

Foreign Currency Translation

A substantial portion of the Company’s revenues are generated in U.S. dollars (“U.S. dollar”). In addition, a substantial portion of the Company’s costs are incurred in U.S. dollars. Company management has determined that the U.S. dollar is the functional currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates.

Accordingly, monetary accounts maintained in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are re-measured into U.S. dollars in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters (“ASC 830”). All transaction gains and losses from the re-measurement of monetary balance sheet items are reflected in the statements of operations as financial income or expenses as appropriate.

The financial statements of Relec, Gresham Power and Enertec, whose functional currencies have been determined to be their local currencies, the British Pound (“GBP”), and the New Israeli Shekel (“ILS”), respectively, have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with ASC 830. All balance sheet accounts have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Statement of operations amounts have been translated using the average exchange rate in effect for the reporting period. The resulting translation adjustments are reported as other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive (loss) income and as accumulated comprehensive loss in the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash is maintained in checking accounts, money market funds and certificates of deposits with reputable financial institutions in banks in the U.S., UK and Israel. Such deposits in the United States may exceed the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits and are not insured in other jurisdictions.

The Company had total cash of $2,195,000 and $1,599,000 at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, with $1,473,000 and $933,000 in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), respectively and $631,000 and $61,000 in Israel, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses on deposits of cash and cash equivalents.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Inventory write-offs are provided to cover risks arising from technological obsolescence as the Company’s products are mostly original equipment manufactured for its clients.

Cost of inventories is determined as follows: 

•Raw materials, parts and supplies—using the “first-in, first-out” method.

•Work-in-progress and finished products—using the “first-in, first-out” method on the basis of direct manufacturing costs with the addition of indirect manufacturing costs.

The Company periodically assesses its inventories valuation in respect of obsolete items by reviewing revenue forecasts and technological obsolescence and moving such items into a reserve allowance for obsolescence. When inventories on hand exceed the foreseeable demand or become obsolete, the value of excess inventory, which at the time of the review was not expected to be sold, is written off. 

Property and Equipment, Net

We record property and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Acquisitions and improvements are capitalized, and maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. As we dispose of assets, we remove the cost and related accumulated depreciation from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is included within loss on disposal or impairment of assets, net. Depreciation expense is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, at the following rates:

Estimated useful lives of assets
AssetsUseful Lives (In Years)
Computer software and office and computer equipment3-5
Machinery and equipment, automobile, furniture and fixtures5-10
Leasehold improvementsOver the term of the lease or life of the asset, whichever is shorter

F-28

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill has a carrying value of $9.1 million and $9.8 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consist of the Company’s acquired trademarks, have a carrying value of $1.5 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but are assessed annually for impairment as of December 31, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying value.

Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. When conducting annual or interim impairment assessments, if applicable, a two-step process is used. First, an optional qualitative evaluation is performed as to whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the Company's each reporting unit is less than its carrying value, using an assessment of relevant events and circumstances. In performing this assessment, the Company is required to make assumptions and judgments including, but not limited to, an evaluation of macroeconomic conditions as they relate to the business, industry and market trends, as well as the overall future financial performance of the reporting unit. If it is determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, no additional tests are performed. However, if the Company concludes otherwise or elects not to perform the qualitative assessment, the Company performs a second step consisting of a quantitative assessment of goodwill impairment. This assessment requires the Company to compare the fair value of its reporting unit with its carrying value. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge will be recognized. In performing this assessment, the Company is required to make assumptions and judgments including, but not limited to, financial projections, discount rate, and future market conditions.

See Note 9 —Goodwill for further information on valuation methodology and impairment of goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2022.

For indefinite-lived intangible assets with indefinite lives, the Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors of the indefinite-lived intangible assets. If the result of a qualitative test indicates that it is more likely that not that the asset is impaired a quantitative test is performed. When a quantitative test is performed, the estimated fair value of an asset is compared to its carrying value. If the carrying value of such asset exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value. No impairment charges related to Indefinite-lived intangible assets were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2022 or 2021.

Intangible Assets

The Company records intangible assets subject to amortization at fair value at the date of acquisition. The Company has trademarks which were determined to have an indefinite life. Intangibles with definite lives consist of Customer relationships, which are amortized on a straight line bases over their estimated useful lives from 10-14 years.

The Company reviews intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable. The factors that the Company considers in deciding when to perform an impairment review include significant underperformance of the business in relation to expectations, significant negative industry or economic trends, and significant changes or planned changes in the use of the assets. When an impairment review is performed to evaluate a long-lived asset for recoverability, the Company compares forecasts of undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the long-lived asset to its carrying value. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset are less than its carrying amount. The impairment loss would be based on the excess of the carrying value of the impaired asset over its fair value, determined based on discounted cash flows. 

Long-Lived Assets

The long-lived assets of the Company are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Management reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted expected future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by comparing the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets to their fair value. 

Note Payable

The Company has elected to record certain notes payable at fair value on the date of issuance, with gains and losses arising from changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations at each period end while such notes payable are outstanding. Issuance costs are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in the period in which they are incurred. The fair value of the notes payable was determined using a probability weighted expected return model, a scenario-based valuation model in which discrete future outcome scenarios for the Company are projected and discounted to present value (See Note 13. Notes payable, related party, net).

F-29

Warranty

The Company offers a warranty period of twelve months for all its manufactured products. The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under its warranty and records a warranty liability in the amount of such costs at the time product revenue is recognized. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of units sold, historical rates of warranty claims and cost per claim. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amount, as necessary.

Contingencies

The Company is periodically involved in litigation arising from other matters in the ordinary course of business. The Company is regularly subject to claims, suits, regulatory and government investigations, and other proceedings involving labor and employment, commercial disputes, and other matters. Such claims, suits, regulatory and government investigations, and other proceedings could result in fines, civil penalties, or other adverse consequences.

Certain of these outstanding matters include speculative, substantial or indeterminate monetary amounts. The Company records a liability when it believes that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the Company determines that a loss is reasonably possible and the loss or range of loss can be estimated, the Company discloses the reasonably possible loss. The Company evaluates developments in its legal matters that could affect the amount of liability that has been previously accrued, and the matters and related reasonably possible losses disclosed, and makes adjustments as appropriate. Significant judgment is required to determine both likelihood of there being and the estimated amount of a loss related to such matters. 

Income Taxes

The Company determines its income taxes under the asset and liability method in accordance with FASB (“ASC No. 740”), Income Taxes, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amount recorded, such differences impact income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made. Interest and penalties, if any, related to accrued liabilities for potential tax assessments are included in income tax expense. ASC No. 740 also requires management to evaluate tax positions taken by the Company and recognize a liability if the Company has taken uncertain tax positions that more likely than not would not be sustained upon examination by applicable taxing authorities. 

Management of the Company has evaluated tax positions taken by the Company and has concluded that as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, there are no uncertain tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, that would require recognition of a liability that would require disclosure in the financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). Under ASC 718:

•the Company recognizes stock-based expenses related to stock option awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting term of two to four years,

•the expected term assumption, using the simplified method, reflects the period for which the Company believes the option will remain outstanding,

•the Company determines the volatility of its stock by looking at the historic volatility of its stock estimated over the expected term of the stock options, and

•the risk-free rate reflects the U.S. Treasury yield for a similar expected life instrument in effect at the time of the grant.

F-30

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model for determining the estimated fair value for stock-based awards. The Black-Scholes model requires the use of assumptions which determine the fair value of stock-based awards, including the option’s expected term and the price volatility of the underlying stock. Forfeitures are accounted for as they occur.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and trade receivables.

Trade receivables of the Company and its subsidiaries are mainly derived from sales to customers located primarily in the U.S., Europe and Israel. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and to date has not experienced any material losses. An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined with respect to those amounts that the Company have determined to be doubtful of collection.

The following table provides the percentage of total revenues attributable to a single customer from which 10% or more of total revenues are derived:

Schedule of percentage of total revenues                
  Year Ended  Year Ended 
Segment December 31, 2022  % of Total Revenue  December 31, 2021  % of Total Revenue 
Customer A $7,408   24% $6,788   27%
Customer B  3,775   12%  7,492   29%
Customer C  3,769   12%  10,803   42%

As of December 31, 2022, one customer accounted for 31% of our total gross accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2021, one customer accounted for 49% of our total gross accounts receivable.
 

Net Loss per Share

Basic net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted Earnings per Share (”EPS”) incorporates the incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method. Anti-dilutive securities are not included in the computation of diluted EPS. 

Comprehensive Loss

The Company reports comprehensive loss in accordance with ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. This statement establishes standards for the reporting and presentation of comprehensive loss and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements. Comprehensive loss generally represents all changes in equity during the period except those resulting from investments by, or distributions to, stockholders.

Leases

The Company accounts for its leases under ASC 842, Leases. Under this guidance, arrangements meeting the definition of a lease are classified as operating or financing leases. Operating leases are recognized as Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, Operating lease liability, current, and Operating lease liability, non-current on our consolidated balance sheets. Lease assets and liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. In certain of our lease agreements, we receive rent holidays and other incentives. We recognize lease costs on a straight-line basis over the lease term without regard to deferred payment terms, such as rent holidays, that defer the commencement date of required payments. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Leasehold improvements are capitalized at cost and amortized over the lesser of their expected useful life or the remaining life of the lease, without assuming renewal features, if any, are exercised. We elected the practical expedient in ASC 842 and do not separate lease and non-lease components for our leases.

Recent Accounting Standards

In November 2021, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2021-10, “Government Assistance (Topic 832),” which requires annual disclosures that increase the transparency of transactions involving government grants, including (1) the types of transactions, (2) the accounting for those transactions, and (3) the effect of those transactions on an entity’s financial statements. The amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021. The adoption of ASU 2021-10 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, “Business Combinations (Topic 805), Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers,” which requires contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination to be recognized and measured by the acquirer on the acquisition date in accordance with ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The guidance will result in the acquirer recognizing contract assets and contract liabilities at the same amounts recorded by the acquiree. The guidance should be applied prospectively to acquisitions occurring on or after the effective date. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including in interim periods, for any financial statements that have not yet been issued. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements.

F-31

In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815- 40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options.” The guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2022. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2022, and has concluded the adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40)—Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity” (“ASU 2020-06”). ASU 2020-06 simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. ASU 2020-06 removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for it. ASU 2020-06 also simplifies the diluted net income per share calculation in certain areas. The amendments in ASU 2020-06 are effective for smaller reporting companies as defined by the SEC for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Effective January 1, 2022, the Company early adopted ASU 2020-06 using the modified retrospective approach, which resulted in no impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminated the calculation of implied goodwill fair value. Instead, companies will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount of goodwill over its fair value. The Company has not elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2017-04. If early adoption had been selected, the goodwill impairment recorded and analysis performed at December 31, 2022 would have been materially different given that one of the reporting units had negative carrying value.

In June 20, 20172016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses”, (“ASU No. 2016-13”) to improve information on credit losses for financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. ASU 2016-13 replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses. This guidance is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2023, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures

Note 4. Revenue Disaggregation

The Company’s disaggregated revenues are comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of disaggregated revenues        
  Year Ended 
Category December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Primary Geographical Markets      
North America $7,317  $6,788 
Europe  9,907   7,492 
Middle East  12,520   10,802 
Other  511   498 
Total revenue $30,255  $25,580 
         
Major Goods        
RF/microwave filters $5,070  $4,905 
Detector logarithmic video amplifiers  1,060   1,888 
Power supply units and systems  11,605   7,854 
Healthcare diagnostic systems  4,073   794 
Defense systems  8,447   10,139 
Total revenue $30,255  $25,580 
         
Timing of Revenue Recognition        
Goods transferred at a point in time $18,430  $13,824 
Services transferred over time  11,825   11,756 
Revenue from contracts with customers $30,255  $25,580 

F-32

Note 5. Inventories, net

Inventories, net, are comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of inventories, net        
  As of 
Category December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Raw materials $2,758  $1,771 
Work-in-progress  3,186   1,115 
Finished goods  1,751   1,320 
Total $7,695  $4,206 

Note 6. Property and Equipment, net

Property and Equipment, net, are comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of property and equipment, net        
  As of 
Category December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Machinery and equipment $6,912  $1,804 
Computer, software and related equipment  1,858   700 
Office furniture and equipment  270   667 
Leasehold improvements  1,878   1,338 
   10,918   4,509 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (8,678)  (2,457)
Property and equipment, net $2,240  $2,052 

Depreciation and amortization expenses related to the property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

Note 7. Business Combination

On September 8, 2022, GIGA acquired 100% of the capital stock of GWW from Ault in exchange for 2.92 million shares of GIGA’s common stock and 514.8 shares of GIGA’s Series F preferred that are convertible into an aggregate of 3.96 million shares of GIGA’s common stock. GIGA also assumed GWW’s outstanding equity awards representing the right to receive up to 749,626 shares of GIGA’s common stock, on an as-converted basis. The transaction described above resulted in a change of control of GIGA. Assuming Ault was to convert all of the Series F, it would own approximately 69.6% of GIGA’ outstanding shares. The Series F Certificate of Determination contains an exchange cap which requires GIGA’s shareholders to approve the issuance of more than 19.99% of GIGA’s outstanding common stock that would apply as of the time of any future conversion (the “Exchange Cap”). On September 8, 2022 the GIGA’s shareholders approved issuances of its common stock upon conversion of the Series F in excess of the Exchange Cap.

We acquired GIGA to gain access to the public capital markets, drive growth, both organically and through strategic combinations with providers of bespoke technology solutions for defense customers, expand GWW’s presence in the US defense market by adding strong management, innovative technology, and more engineering resources and to unlock synergies across operating subsidiaries.

On September 8, 2022, Ault loaned GIGA $4.2 million by purchasing a convertible note that carries an interest rate of 10% per annum and matures on February 14, 2023. This note was exchanged to Exchange Note on December 31, 2022 as described in Note 13. Notes Payable, Related Parties, net.

In respect of the above transactions, the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, together with acquired processes and employees, represent a business as defined in ASC 805, Business Combinations. The transactions were accounted for as a reverse acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting with GIGA treated as the legal acquirer and GWW treated as the accounting acquirer. In identifying GWW as the acquiring entity for accounting purposes, GIGA and GWW took into account a number of factors, including the relative voting rights, executive management and the corporate governance structure of the Company. GWW is considered the accounting acquirer since the Company controls the board of directors of GIGA following the transactions and received a 71.2% beneficial ownership interest in GIGA. However, no single factor was the sole determinant in the overall conclusion that GWW is the acquirer for accounting purposes; rather all relevant factors were considered in arriving at such conclusion.

The fair value of the purchase consideration is $8.2 million, consisting of $4.0 million for GIGA’s common stock and prefunded warrants, $0.4 million fair value of vested stock incentives and $3.8 million for cash consideration paid to existing preferred stockholders 

The Company estimated the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed using valuation techniques, such as the income, cost and market approaches. The fair values are based on available historical information and on future expectations and assumptions deemed reasonable by management but are inherently uncertain. The income method to measure the fair value of intangible assets, is based on forecasts of the expected future cash flows attributable to the respective assets. Significant estimates and assumptions inherent in the valuations reflected a consideration of other marketplace participants and included the amount and timing of future cash flows (including expected growth rates and profitability), the underlying product or technology life cycles, economic barriers to entry and the discount rate applied to the cash flows. Unanticipated market or macroeconomic events and circumstances could affect the accuracy or validity of the estimates and assumptions.

F-33

We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values at the date of the business combination. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Such valuations require us to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Significant estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, estimated replacement costs and future expected cash flows from acquired customers, acquired technology, acquired patents, and trade names from a market participant perspective, useful lives and discount rates. The estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. Allocation of purchase consideration to identifiable assets and liabilities affects our amortization expense, as acquired finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful life, whereas any indefinite lived intangible assets, including trademark and goodwill, are not amortized. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. During the three months ended December 31, 2022, the measurement period adjustment increased the preliminary allocation of goodwill by $9.2 million due to revised forecasts resulting from the lack of sales and backlog, with the offset to trademark, developed technologies, customer lists, inventory and other assets by $1.0 million, $1.4 million, $3.9 million, $2.7 million and $0.2 million respectively. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments will be recorded to earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

The purchase price allocation is as follows (In thousands):

Summary of purchase price allocation    
Allocation of purchase price: Amount 
Common stock exchanged $4,055 
Fair value of GIGA equity awards  349 
Cash consideration paid to existing preferred stockholders  3,794 
Total consideration $8,198 
     
Identifiable net assets acquired (liabilities assumed)    
Cash $107 
Trade accounts receivables  536 
Inventories  2,529 
Prepaid expenses  116 
Accrued revenue  363 
Property and equipment  331 
Right-of-use asset  370 
Other long-term assets  269 
Accounts payable  (2,831)
Loans payable, net of discounts and issuance costs  (1,687)
Accrued payroll and benefits  (1,488)
Lease obligations  (491)
Other current liabilities  (368)
Other non-current liabilities  (17)
Net assets acquired  (2,261)
Goodwill $10,459 

Consolidated proforma unaudited financial statements

The following unaudited proforma combined financial information is based on the historical financial statements of the Company and Giga-tronics and subsidiaries after giving effect to the Company’s acquisition of the companies as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2021.

F-34

The following unaudited proforma information does not purport to present what the Company’s actual results would have been had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2021, nor is the financial information indicative of the results of future operations. The following table represents the unaudited consolidated proforma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2021.

Summary of unaudited pro forma financial information                
Proforma, unaudited (In thousands) Gresham  Giga-tronics  Proforma  Proforma 
Year ended December 31, 2022 Worldwide, Inc.     Adjustments  Unaudited 
Net Sales $28,825  $5,651  $  $34,476 
Cost of Sales  20,227   5,151      25,378 
Operating expenses  12,136   18,426      30,562 
Other expense  987   1,276      2,263 
Income tax benefit  123         123 
Net gain attributable to non-controlling interest  680          680 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(3,722) $(19,202) $  $(22,924)
Basic and diluted loss per common share $(1.27) $(6.90) $  $(4.02)
Weighted average shares outstanding  2,920   2,782      5,702 

                 
Proforma, unaudited (In thousands) Gresham  Giga-tronics  Proforma  Proforma 
Year ended December 31, 2021 Worldwide, Inc.     Adjustments  Unaudited 
Net Sales $25,580  $10,319  $  $35,899 
Cost of Sales  17,231   6,633      23,864 
Operating expenses  11,340   5,944      17,284 
Other income  (321)  115      (206)
Income tax provision  (193)        (193)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest  (243)         (243)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(3,106) $(2,373) $  $(5,479)
Basic and diluted loss per common share $(1.06) $(0.85) $  $(0.96)
Weighted average shares outstanding  2,920   2,782      5,702 

Note 8. Intangible Assets, net

Intangible assets, net, are comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of intangible assets, net          
Category Useful Life December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Trademark Indefinite life $1,493  $1,546 
Customer relationships 10-14 years  3,825   4,201 
     5,318   5,747 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization    (1,842)  (1,712)
Intangible assets, net   $3,476  $4,035 

No impairment charges related to Indefinite-lived intangible assets were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2022 or 2021.

Amortization expense on the definite lived intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

The following table presents estimated amortization expense for each of the succeeding five calendar years and thereafter (In thousands):

Schedule of estimated amortization expense    
Fiscal Year December 31, 2022 
2023  323 
2024  323 
2025  323 
2026  323 
2027  323 
Thereafter  368 
  $1,983 

F-35

Note 9. Goodwill

The Company’s goodwill decreased by $0.8 million due to the effects of exchange rate changes. The following table summarizes the changes in our goodwill for the twelve months period ended December 31, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021 (In thousands):

Schedule of changes in goodwill    
Description Goodwill 
Balance as of January 1, 2021 $9,645 
Effect of exchange rate changes  167 
Balance as of December 31, 2021  9,812 
Acquisition of GIGA on September 8, 2022  10,459 
Impairment  (10,459)
Effect of exchange rate changes  (758)
Balance as of December 31, 2022 $9,054 

The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually on December 31 or more frequently if there are indicators that the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value. 

The Giga-tronics reporting unit experienced a significant decline in sale during the fourth quarter of 2022 and is projecting a negative growth rate due to customers scaling back on programs, a lack of backlog, a highly competitive industry and certain operational challenges that have affected our expectations such that future growth and profitability is significantly lower than previous estimates. Furthermore, during the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company’s market capitalization declined steadily which, although not a determinant on its own, when combined with the other factors indicated that Giga-tronics reporting unit goodwill was determined to be impaired.

For Enertec, Relec and Microphase reporting units, the Company has determined that despite a declining market capitalization, the reporting units themselves benefit from a continued positive forecast within the industry, a significant backlog of contracted work, a history of and projected positive earnings and have not experience any technological, market or operational circumstances which indicate that the carrying values of reporting units goodwill may not be recoverable. Based on the qualitative assessment, it was concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units is less than its carrying amount. Management concluded that no quantitative testing was needed as it was not more likely than not that reporting units fair value are less than its carrying value as of December 31, 2022. 

Because the qualitative test indicated that Giga-tronics reporting unit goodwill was determined to be impaired a second phase of the goodwill impairment test ("Step 2") was performed specific to Giga-tronics reporting unit. Under Step 2, the fair value of the reporting unit was estimated for the purpose of deriving an estimate of the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of the goodwill was then compared to the recorded goodwill to determine the amount of the impairment. The Company utilized an enterprise value-based income approach to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. The income approach discounts projected free cashflows of the reporting unit at a computed weighted average cost of capital of 17.5% as the discount rate. The income approach requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, which include a zero revenue growth assumption and negative future operating margins used to calculate projected future cashflows, weighted average cost of capital, and future economic and market conditions. The Company bases the forecasts on its knowledge of the industry, recent performance and expected future performance of the reporting unit, and other assumptions management believes to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates.

As a result, the entire $10.5 million carrying amount of Giga-tronics reporting unit goodwill was recognized as a non-cash impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2022. There were no impairments of goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Note 10. Other Current Liabilities

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, other current liabilities consist of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of other current liabilities        
Category December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes $2,401  $1,317 
Deferred revenue  1,028   401 
Warranty liability  51   47 
Other accrued expense  774   130 
Other current liabilities $4,254  $1,895 

Note 11. Leases

Operating leases

We have operating leases for office space. Our leases have remaining lease terms from 2 months to 8.5 years, some of which may include options to extend the leases perpetually, and some of which may include options to terminate the leases within 1 year.

F-36

The following table provides a summary of leases by balance sheet category as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 (In thousands):

Summary of leases by balance sheet category        
Description December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Operating right-of-use assets $3,940  $4,333 
Operating lease liability - current $1,067  $659 
Operating lease liability - non-current $3,014  $3,712 

The components of lease expenses for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follow (In thousands):

Components of lease expenses        
  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Operating lease cost $1,125  $957 

The following table provides a summary of other information related to leases for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (In thousands):

Summary of supplemental unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet information related to operating leases        
  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:        
Operating cash flows from operating leases $1,135  $983 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange of new operating lease liabilities  275    
Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases  5.6 years   8.8 years 
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases  7%  12%

The Company determined that using a discount rate between 7% and 12% is reasonable, as this is consistent with the mortgage rates for commercial properties for the time period commensurate with the terms of the leases. 

Maturity of lease liabilities under our non-cancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2022 are as follow (In thousands):

Maturity of lease liabilities under non-cancellable operating leases    
Fiscal Year Operating leases 
2023 $1,359 
2024  938 
2025  756 
2026  516 
2027  364 
Thereafter  1,144 
Total future minimum lease payments  5,077 
Less: imputed interest  (996)
Present value of lease liabilities $4,081 

Note 12. Notes Payable

Notes payable on December 31, 2022 and 2021, were comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of notes payable        
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Short-term bank credit $1,623  $949 
Financed receivables  71    
Other short-term notes payable  425   12 
Total notes payable  2,119   961 
Less: current portion  (1,797)  (961)
Notes payable - long-term portion $322  $ 

Short-term bank credit

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, Enertec had short-term bank credit of $1.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively, that bears 6%interest, and is paid either on a monthly or weekly basis.

Financed receivables

The Company has a business financing agreement (”Financing Agreement”) with Western Alliance Bank. Under the Financing Agreement, the Company may borrow up to 85% of the amounts of customer invoices issued by the Company, up to a maximum of $2.5 million in aggregate advances outstanding at any time. 

Interest accrues on amounts outstanding under the Financing Agreement at an annual rate equal to the greater of prime or 4.5% plus one percent. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the annual interest rate was 8.5% per annum and 5.5% per annum, respectively. The Company is required to pay certain fees, including an annual facility fee of $14,700, to be paid in two equal semiannual installments. The Company’s obligations under the Financing Agreement are secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company and any domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain customary exceptions. The Financing Agreement has no specified term and may be terminated by either the Company or Western Alliance Bank at any time. 

F-37

The Financing Agreement contains customary events of default, including, among others: non-payment of principal, interest or other amounts when due; providing false or misleading representations and information; Western Alliance Bank failing to have an enforceable first lien on the collateral; cross-defaults with certain other indebtedness; certain undischarged judgments; bankruptcy, insolvency or inability to pay debts; and a change of control of the Company. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, the interest rate on the outstanding borrowings increases by 500 basis points and the bank maydeclare the loans and all other obligations under the Financing Agreement immediately due and payable. Western Alliance Bank waived the potential change in control default in relation to the Acquisition.

At December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021,the Company’s total outstanding borrowings under the Financing Agreement were $71,000 and $0, respectively, and are included under current liabilities in notes payable on the consolidated balance sheets.

On January 11, 2023, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with two accredited investors (the “Lenders”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Lenders $3.3 million of convertible notes. The Lenders required us to terminate the Financing Agreement as a condition of issuance of the notes (see Note 22. Subsequent Events).

Other short-term notes payable

Microphase has business financing agreements for equipment leases with several lenders. Under these financing agreements Microphase has short-term notes outstanding of $103,000 and long term notes outstanding of $322,000 paid monthly.

Note 13. Notes Payable, Related Parties, net

Notes payable, related parties, net on December 31, 2022 and 2021, were comprised of the following (In thousands):

Schedule of notes payable related parties, net            
  Interest rate  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Senior Secured Convertible Note (2)  10.0% $3,940  $ 
Senior Secured Convertible Note (3)  10.0%  6,068    
Notes payable, related parties, net     $10,008  $ 

Senior Secured Convertible Note (1)

On September 8, 2022, Ault loaned the Company $4,250,000 by purchasing a Senior Secured Convertible Note (1) (the “Convertible Note”) pursuant to a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) upon the closing of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Business Combination”).  The Convertible Note carries an interest rate of 10% per annum and matures on February 14, 2023.

The holder may at any time elect to convert in whole or in part, the outstanding principal and interest under the Convertible Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $3.25 per share (the “Conversion Shares”). In addition, all principal and outstanding interest under the Convertible Note will automatically convert to the Company’s common stock upon the closing of an underwritten public offering of common stock with net proceeds (net of underwriters’ discounts and selling commissions) of at least $25 million (the “Proposed Offering”). The Convertible Note may not be converted to the extent the holder would, as a result of such conversion, beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s common stock. The holder may increase this limit to 9.99% on 61 days’ notice to us.

The Convertible Note is secured by all of the Company’s assets and the assets of the Company’s subsidiaries pursuant to a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”). The Convertible Note contains customary events of default (each an “Event of Default”). If an Event of Default occurs, interest under the Convertible Note will accrue at a rate of 18% per annum and the outstanding principal amount of the Convertible Note, plus accrued but unpaid interest, liquidated damages and other amounts owing with respect to the Convertible Note will become, at the Convertible Note holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash.

The Company may prepay all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Convertible Note at a premium that increases over the term, ranging from 5% to 25%. If the Company completes a public or private offering of $5.0 million or more of its common stock (net of underwriting discounts and commission) prior to the maturity date, the Company must prepay all or part of the principal amount of the Convertible Note outstanding at a premium that increases over the term, ranging from 5% to 25% using up to 50% of the proceeds from the Proposed Offering. However, if the Company closes the Proposed Offering, the principal of the Convertible Note will be applied toward Ault’s $10 million purchase of the Company’s common stock.

F-38

The Company accounts for its Convertible note under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. Under ASC 815-15-25, an election can be made at the inception of a financial instrument to account for the instrument under the fair value option under ASC 825. The Company has made such election for its Convertible note. Using the fair value option, the Convertible note is recorded at its initial fair value on the date of issuance, and each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of the Convertible note are recognized as a non-cash gain or loss on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair value of the Convertible note liability was determined based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The Company used the probability-weighted expected term method (“PWERM”) to value the Convertible note liability. This approach involved the estimation of future potential outcomes for the Company, as well as values and probabilities associated with each respective potential outcome. The Company assigned 82.5% probability to the Convertible note liability remaining outstanding until maturity and 17.5% probability of default on Convertible note, since the probability of a qualified or non-qualified financing in the near-term was assessed at 0%. The Company calculated the present value of the Convertible note payoff on the maturity date using the income approach, which focuses on the income-producing capability of a business and estimated value based on the expectation of future cash flows. Key assumption used in the calculation included the discount rate of 29%, which was calculated using term-matched market yields for CCC rated corporate paper and an incremental company specific risk premium. The Company also considered the probability of GIGA shares trading above the conversion price of $3.25 (fixed price conversion option), in which case voluntary conversion was assessed to be likely just before maturity. The incremental value of such conversion was assessed using a Black-Scholes model. Significant assumptions used in Black-Scholes model include volatility of 127.3%, risk-free rate of 3.3% and expected term of 0.43 year. After taking into consideration the PWERM of this scenario, the Company arrived at the fair value of the Convertible note liability.

In addition, the Company agreed to indemnify Ault against losses from its breach of its covenants, representations and warranties under the Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company issued the Convertible Note.

The Company also entered into Registration Rights Agreement with Ault requiring the Company to file a registration statement with the SEC within 15 days of the voluntary conversion of the Convertible Note by Ault or in connection with a non-qualified public offering. The Registration Rights Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, certain liquidated damages provisions for failing to comply with the timing obligations for the filing and effectiveness of the registration statement, and certain customary indemnification obligations.

Of the $4,250,000 loaned to the Company, it used $3,794,000 to redeem all of its preferred stock that was outstanding prior to the Closing Date. The Company previously entered into repurchase agreements with the holders of the outstanding shares of its preferred stock. The preferred stock holders included Lutz Henckels, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer who received $246,000 and Thomas Vickers, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors who received $116,000.

Based upon the fair value of the Convertible Note at September 8, 2022, which was $4,392,000 using the probability-weighted present value on such date, we recorded a realized loss of $1,092,000 related to the revaluation of the Convertible Note to $5,484,000 on December 31,2022, which was recorded as “Other income & expense” before exchange of this note for the Exchange Note noted below.

Senior Secured Convertible Note (2)

On December 31, 2022 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into an exchange agreement with Ault to exchange the Senior Secured Convertible Note (1) due February 14, 2023 in the principal face amount of $4,250,000 dated September 8, 2022 and any accrued interest thereon for a Senior Secured Convertible Note (2) in the principal amount of $4,382,740 due December 31, 2024 (the “Exchange Note”).

The Exchange Note bears interest at 10% per annum. The Exchange Note is, at the option of Ault, convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.78 per share, or (ii) the VWAP Price (as defined in the Exchange Note) on such date less a 20% discount to such VWAP Price, but in no event less than $0.25 per share. In addition, all principal and outstanding interest under the Exchange Note will automatically convert to the Company’s common stock upon (i) the consummation of a public offering of securities in which the Company receives net proceeds (net of underwriters’ discounts and selling commissions) of at least $25 million (a “Qualified Public Offering”), in which case the conversion price shall be the price at which the Common Stock is sold to the public, provided, however, that no underwriters’ discounts or selling commissions shall be imposed on such conversion, (ii) the consummation of a private or public offering of shares of Common Stock that is not a Qualified Public Offering but that results in the net proceeds (net of underwriters’ discounts and selling commissions) to the Company of at least $5 million (a “Non-Qualified Offering”), in which case the conversion price shall be the price at which Common Stock is sold in such Non-Qualified Offering less a twenty-five percent (25%) discount or (iii) December 31, 2024, in which case the conversion price shall be the VWAP Price less a 25% discount to such VWAP Price.

The Company’s obligations under the Exchange Agreement and the Exchange Note are secured by a lien on all of the assets of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to the Security Agreement dated December 31, 2022 (the “Exchange Security Agreement”), by and among the Company, its two of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Microsource. and Gresham, and Ault. 

F-39

The Company performed a fair value analysis on the Exchange Note. The fair value of the Exchange note liability was determined based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The Company used the PWERM to value the Exchange note liability. This approach involved the estimation of future potential outcomes for the Company, as well as values and probabilities associated with each respective potential outcome. The Company assigned 35% probability for non-qualified financing, 25% probability for qualified financing, 15% probability to the Exchange note liability remaining outstanding until maturity and 25% probability of default on Exchange note. The Company calculated the present value of the Exchange note payoff on the maturity date using the income approach, which focuses on the income-producing capability of a business and estimated value based on the expectation of future cash flows. Key assumption used in the calculation included the discount rate of 23%, which was calculated using term-matched market yields for CCC rated corporate paper and an incremental company specific risk premium. The Company also considered the probability of GIGA shares trading above the conversion price of $3.25 (fixed price conversion option), in which case voluntary conversion was assessed to be likely just before maturity. The incremental value of such conversion was assessed using a Black-Scholes model. Significant assumptions used in Black-Scholes model include volatility of 131.4%, risk-free rate of 4.4% and expected term of 2 years. After taking into consideration the PWERM of this scenario, the Company arrived at the fair value of the Exchange note liability as a Long term liability with a fair value of $3,940,000. The change in the fair values of $1,544,000 between Convertible Note valued at $5,484,000, which was exchanged for the Exchange Note valued at $3,940,000, was recorded as Common Stock, and had no impact on the net loss to common stockholders of the Company.

Senior Secured Convertible Note (3) and Warrant

On the Closing Date, the Company also entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) by and between the Company and Ault Lending, LLC, (“Ault Lending”), whereby the Company issued Ault Lending a 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note in the principal amount of $6,750,000 (the “Secured Note”) and five-year Warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Warrants are exercisable for five years from December 31, 2022, at an exercise price of $0.01, subject to certain adjustments. In connection with the issuance of the Secured Note, as of the Closing Date, Ault Lending agreed to surrender for cancellation a term note dated November 12, 2021, in the principal face amount $1,300,000 previously issued by the Company to Ault Lending, including accrued but unpaid interest thereon in the amount of $123,123. In addition, on the Closing Date advances previously made by Ault Lending to the Company in the aggregate amount of $4,067,469 were rolled into the Secured Note . Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, as additional consideration for the issuance of the Secured Note, Ault Lending agreed to provide the Company an additional $1,259,407 no later than May 31, 2023, which is recorded as a Receivable, related party at December 31, 2022.

The Secured Note is due December 31, 2024, and bears interest at 10% per annum. The voluntary conversion and automatic conversion price of the Secured Note are similar to the conversion price of the Exchange Note. 

With a limited exception, the Secured Note contains a most favored nations provision with respect to future financings of the Company. With limited exceptions, the Company also agreed to certain negative covenants that will require the prior approval of the holder of the Secured Note to incur indebtedness (other than permitted indebtedness), enter into variable rate transactions, incur indebtedness for borrowed money, purchase money indebtedness or lease obligations that would be required to be capitalized on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or guaranty the obligations of any other person, in an aggregate amount at any time outstanding in excess of $1,000,000 in any individual transaction or $2,500,000 in the aggregate. The Company’s obligations under the Purchase Agreement and the Secured Note are secured by a lien on all of the assets of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to a Security Agreement, dated December 31, 2022 by and among the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Microsource and Gresham, and Ault Lending and Ault. 

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company and two of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Microsource, Inc. and Gresham Holdings, Inc., entered into a Guaranty Agreement, dated December 31, 2022 with Ault Lending. Each such subsidiary guaranteed to Ault Lending the payment of the Secured Note. 

In connection with the issuance of the Exchange Note and the Secured Note, the Company granted Ault and Ault Lending certain mandatory and piggy back registration rights pursuant to two Registration Rights Agreements. 

On January 3, 2023 the Company, Ault and Ault Lending entered into a letter agreement whereby the parties agree that notwithstanding any obligations in any of the foregoing transaction documents the Company shall not be required to reserve more than 150% of the shares issuable under the Exchange Note and the Secured Note using $0.78 per share (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends or combinations) plus reservation of one share for each outstanding share issuable under the warrants (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends or combinations).

The Company performed a fair value analysis on the Secured Note and the Warrants. The fair value of the Secured note liability was determined based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The Company used the PWERM to value the Secured note liability. This approach involved the estimation of future potential outcomes for the Company, as well as values and probabilities associated with each respective potential outcome. The Company assigned 35% probability for non-qualified financing, 25% probability for qualified financing, 15% probability to the Secured note liability remaining outstanding until maturity and 25% probability of default on Secured note. The Company calculated the present value of the Secured note payoff on the maturity date using the income approach, which focuses on the income-producing capability of a business and estimated value based on the expectation of future cash flows. Key assumption used in the calculation included the discount rate of 23%, which was calculated using term-matched market yields for CCC rated corporate paper and an incremental company specific risk premium. The Company also considered the probability of GIGA shares trading above the conversion price of $3.25 (fixed price conversion option), in which case voluntary conversion was assessed to be likely just before maturity. The incremental value of such conversion was assessed using a Black-Scholes model. Significant assumptions used in Black-Scholes model include volatility of 131.4%, risk-free rate of 4.4% and expected term of 2 years. After taking into consideration the PWERM of this scenario, the Company arrived at the fair value of the Secured note liability as a Long term liability with a fair value of $6,068,000. The fair value of the “Penny” warrants was based on the residual value of $682,000 remaining after allocating fair value to the Secured Note from the proceed of $6,750,000. The fair value of the warrants was recorded as common stock.

F-40

Note 14. Related Party Transactions

Allocation of General Corporate Expenses

Ault provided human resources, accounting, and other services to Gresham and after September 8th to us. Gresham obtained its business insurance under Ault’s policies. The accompanying financial statements of Gresham include allocations of these expenses. The allocation method calculates the appropriate share of overhead costs to Gresham by using Gresham’s revenue as a percentage of total revenue of Ault. Gresham believes the allocation methodology used is reasonable and has been consistently applied, and results in an appropriate allocation of costs incurred. However, these allocations may not be indicative of the cost had Gresham been a stand-alone entity or of future costs. Ault allocated $1.09 million for the year ended December 30, 2022, and $1.39 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Ault allocated these costs as follows (In thousands):

Schedule of related party transactions        
  Years Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Related party transactions $1,090  $1,390 

Net Transfers From Ault

The Company received funding from Ault to cover any shortfalls on operating cash requirements. In addition to the allocation of general corporate expenses, the Company received $0.5 million and $4.7 million from Ault for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Note 15. Stock-based Compensation

On May 25, 2021, GWW issued its executives options to purchase an aggregate total of 100,000 shares of GWW Class A common stock, at an exercise price per share of $14.84, with 50% of these options vested immediately. The remaining 50% vest pro-rata monthly over 3 years. Additionally, the executives were granted RSUs to acquire an aggregate of 50,000 shares of GWW Class A common stock, vesting annually over a three-year term. Upon the Business Combination on September 8, 2022 the 100,000 shares of GWW options converted to 499,751 options to purchase common shares of the Company with an exercise price of $2.97 per share and 50,000 RSUs of GWW were converted to 249,875 RSUs for common shares of the Company with no change in vesting terms. Additionally, 301,380 stock options granted and outstanding under GIGA’s Equity Incentive Plans were unaffected by the Business Combination except for revaluation on September 8, 2022. All options expires ten years from the grant date.

The stock-based compensation expense included in net loss for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $605,000 and $629,000, respectively, based on the estimated fair value of the stock awards on the date of issuance. As these stock awards were issued prior to the business combination, the estimated fair value of the stock awards were based on observable market prices of Ault’s common stock and extrapolated to GWW based upon its relative fair value within Ault as determined by equal weighting of revenues, operating income, and net tangible assets between Ault’s subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2022, there was $612,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

As of December 31, 2022, a total of 796,958 stock options are outstanding at weighted average exercise price of $3.58 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.71 years. Of the options outstanding, 658,219 options are fully vested with an weighted average exercise price of $3.67 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.59 years.

As of December 31, 2021, a total of 499,751 stock options are outstanding at weighted average exercise price of $2.97 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 9.4 years. Of the options outstanding, 298,462 options are fully vested with an weighted average exercise price of $2.97 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 9.4 years.

4,173 and nil options were cancelled for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. There were no exercises of options for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a total of 249,875 restricted stock awards were outstanding. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a total of 48,587 and 131,878 restricted stock awards were vested.

Note 16. Increase in Ownership Interest of Subsidiary

On July 1, 2022, GWW acquired an additional 444,444 newly issued shares of Microphase to increase its ownership interest in Microphase from 54.56% of 63.07% in exchange for consideration of $1 million.

F-41

Note 17. Stockholder’s Equity

Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation

On September 22, 2022, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) with the California Secretary of State to increase the number of shares the Company is authorized to issue to 101,000,000 shares by increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock from 13,333,333 shares to 100,000,000 shares.

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock with no par value. 

The Company had authorized Series A convertible preferred stock of 250,000. No shares are issued and outstanding.

The Company had issued series B through E preferred stock which were redeemed with the business combination (See Note 7. Business Combination). 

On September 8, 2022, the Company issued Ault, as part of the consideration for the acquisition of GWW, 514.8 shares of Series F preferred stock. The terms, preferences and rights of holders of the Series F are set forth in the Certificate of Determination which was filed with the California Secretary of State, on August 23, 2022.

Seniority and Liquidation Preference

The Series F ranks senior to the shares of the Company’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights on the distribution of assets on any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of its affairs. The Series F has a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. The 514.8 shares of Series F have an aggregate liquidation preference of $12,870,140

Conversion Right

The shares of Series F are convertible into the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option at a conversion price of $3.25 per share, subject to customary adjustments for stock splits (including the reverse split). The 514.8 shares of Series F that were issued to Ault upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement are convertible into an aggregate of 3,960,043 shares of the Company’s common stock. If converted in a public offering of the Company’s stock, the conversion price will be at the public offering price less underwriting discounts and commissions. 

Dividend Rights

The holders of Series F are entitled to participate with the Company’s common stock and receive such dividends and distributions as they would receive if their shares of Series F are converted to common stock. The Company may not pay dividends without the consent of the holders of the Series F. Holders of Series F are also entitled to such dividends as the Board may declare on shares from time to time, if any. 

Voting Rights; Board Representation

Holders of Series F have the right to vote on matters submitted to a vote of the holders of common stock on an as-converted basis unless required by applicable law. In addition, holders of Series F are entitled to elect four of the Company’s seven directors. Upon the closing of the Business Combination, Ault exercised its right adding four directors to our board of directors including our Chief Executive Officer and three persons who are Ault directors.

Approval Rights for Certain Matters

For so long as Ault consolidates the Company as a subsidiary of Ault for financial reporting purposes, the Company will require prior approval of the holders of the Series F to incur indebtedness in excess of $1 million per individual transaction or $2.5 million in the aggregate or to complete a merger, acquisition or purchase of assets where the aggregate consideration is valued at more than $1 million. Holders of the Series F have separate class approval rights over certain specified actions that would affect the rights of holders of the Series F (see Note 22. Subsequent Events).

Preemptive/Participation Rights

If the Company sells any voting stock, or securities representing the right to acquire its voting stock, holders of Series F have the right to purchase, at the same price as other participants in the offering, a pro rata portion of such securities based on their aggregate voting power held such that they may maintain the percentage of voting power held. This participation right does not apply to certain exercises and conversions of outstanding securities, certain issuances pursuant to equity incentive plans and certain public offerings of the Company’s common stock of $25 million or more. This participation right terminates upon the earlier of the date that holders of Series F cease to beneficially own at least 50% of the Company’s common stock or September 8, 2027.

Common Stock

Common stock confers upon the holders the rights to receive notice to participate and vote at any meeting of stockholders of the Company, to receive dividends, if and when declared, and to participate in a distribution of any surplus of assets upon liquidation of the Company. 

F-42

Note 18. Income Taxes

The following is a geographical breakdown of income/loss before the provision for income tax, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands)

Schedule of geographical breakdown of income/loss before provision for income tax        
  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
United States $(19,150) $(3,470)
International  609   800 
Total $(18,541) $(2,670)

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects or (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts or assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and (b) operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. 

The tax effects of significant items comprising the Company’s deferred taxes as of December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of tax effects of significant comprising deferred taxes        
  Year Ended 
Deferred tax assets: December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Accrued compensation $247  $20 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  1  $1 
Inventory adjustments  1,654  $339 
Unrealized gains/losses  233  $233 
Other carryforwards  317  $18 
Net operating loss carryforward  6,542  $2,391 
Lease liability  668  $737 
Stock option expense  670  $176 
Other accrued expenses  276  $258 
Fixed assets  17  $29 
Total deferred tax assets $10,625  $4,202 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
ROU assets $(628) $(722)
Intangible assets  (467)  (752)
Total deferred tax liabilities $(1,095) $(1,474)
         
Valuation allowance $9,530  $2,728 
Net deferred taxes $  $ 

The federal and state income tax provision (benefit) is summarized as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of federal and state income tax provision benefit        
  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Current      
Federal $(191) $123 
State  (27) $44 
International  95   26 
Total current tax expense  (123)  193 
Deferred        
Federal      
State      
International      
Total deferred tax expense $  $ 
         
Total tax (benefit) expense $(123) $193 

ASC 740 requires that the tax benefit of net operating losses, temporary differences and credit carryforwards be recorded as an asset to the extent that management assesses that realization is "more likely than not." Realization of the future tax benefits is dependent on the Company's ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carryforward period. Because of the Company's recent history of operating losses, management believes that recognition of the deferred tax assets arising from the above-mentioned future tax benefits is currently not likely to be realized and, accordingly, has provided a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance increased by $6,803,000 and $1,026,000 for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

F-43

Net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards as of December 31, 2022 are as follows:

Schedule of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards      
  Amount  Expiration
     Years
Net operating losses, federal (post December 31, 2017) $15,098  Do not expire
Net operating losses, federal (pre January 1, 2018)  3,286  2023 to 2037
Net operating losses, state  22,360  2021 to 2042
Tax credits federal  46  2040
Tax credits, state  175  Do not expire
Net operating losses, foreign  10,206  Do not expire

The effective tax rate of the company’s provision (benefit) for income taxes differs from the federal statutory rate as follows:

Schedule of effective tax rate for income taxes differs from federal statutory rate        
  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Statutory rate  21.00%  21.00%
State tax  2.83%  10.00%
Permanent differences  (0.07)%  (0.23)%
Changes in valuation allowance  (9.82)%  (38.82)%
Change in foreign tax rate  0.30%  %
Impairment of goodwill  (11.84)%  %
Foreign tax rate differential  0.04%  3.14%
General intangible low tax income  (1.77)%  (5.97)%
Prior period and other adjustments  1.28%  3.54%
Unrealized gain on convertible note  (1.28)%  %
Total  0.67%  (7.34)%

In January 2018, the FASB released guidance on the accounting for tax on the global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) provisions of the Tax Act. The GILTI provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. The Company elected to treat any potential GILTI inclusions as a period cost.

The Company is subject to tax in the U.K. and Israel and is subject to audit by tax authorities in the U.K. and Israel for which returns are subject to examination for various years dependent on the jurisdiction.

Note 19. Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (excluding outstanding stock options). Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the potential effect of dilutive securities which are convertible into common shares (using the treasury stock method), except in cases in which the effect would be anti-dilutive. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share:

Schedule of earnings per share, basic and diluted        
(In thousands except per share data) Year Ended 
  December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Numerator:      
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(17,738) $(3,106)
Denominator:        
Basic weighted average shares outstanding  5,552   2,920 
Effect of dilutive securities      
Diluted weighted-average shares  5,552   2,920 
         
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted $(3.20) $(1.06)

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, because the Company was in a loss position, basic net loss per share is the same as diluted net loss per share as the inclusion of the potential common shares would have been anti-dilutive.

F-44

The following table sets forth potential shares of common stock that are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation above because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods indicated:

Schedule of antidilutive securities        
Anti-dilutive securities (In thousands) December 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options  797   500 
Common shares issuable on conversion of series F preferred stock  3,960   3,960 
Common shares issuable upon exercise of warrants  2,299    
Restricted stock awards  250   250 
Common shares issuable upon conversion of senior secured convertible notes  14,256    
Total  21,562   4,710 

Note 20. Commitments and Contingencies

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Enertec’s guarantees balance from Hapoalim bank was $3.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively for project implementation fees which are released upon delivery of the project products to the customer. 

Note 21. Segment Information

The Company hasthree reportable segments as of December 31, 2022. Prior to the Business Combination, GWW operated as two operating segments but aggregated its results into one reportable segment based on similarity in economic characteristics, other qualitative factors and the objectives and principals of ASC 280, Segment Reporting.

The following data presents the revenues, expenditures and other operating data of the Company’s operating segments for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:

Schedule of revenues, expenditures and other operating data of company's operating segments                                
  Year Ended December 31, 2022  Year Ended December 31, 2021 
Description Precision
Electronic
Solutions
  Power
Electronics
& Display
  RF
Solutions
  Total  Precision
Electronic
Solutions
  Power
Electronics &
Display
  RF
Solutions
  Total 
Revenue $13,950  $10,175  $6,130  $30,255  $10,932  $7,854  $6,794  $25,580 
Cost of revenue  10,632   6,651   4,497   21,780   7,419   5,361   4,451  $17,231 
Gross profit  3,318   3,524   1,633   8,475   3,513   2,493   2,343   8,349 
Operating expenses  6,686   4,022   3,684   14,392   4,316   3,629   3,395   11,340 
Impairment of goodwill  10,459         10,459             
Other (expense) income, net  (1,781)  (26)  (358)  (2,165)  (83)  23   381   321 
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (15,608)  (524)  (2,409)  (18,541)  (886)  (1,113)  (671)  (2,670)
Assets (at period end)  20,076   8,316   10,562   38,954   16,614   7,308   9,983   33,905 

Note 22. Subsequent Events

On January 11, 2023, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with two accredited investors (the “Lenders”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Lenders $3.3 million 10% original issue discount Senior Secured Convertible Notes (the “Notes”) and five-year Warrants to purchase shares of common stock, no par value for total gross proceeds of $3,000,000. The net proceeds shall be used primarily for working capital. 

The Notes are secured by the assets of the Company pursuant to a Security Agreement entered into for such purpose, and are senior to the indebtedness payable to Ault and Ault Lending, pursuant to a Subordination Agreement entered into in connection with the SPA. 

The Notes mature on the earlier of (i) nine months from the issuance date, or October 11, 2023, or (ii) completion of the uplist transaction pursuant to which the Company’s common stock becomes listed for trading on a national securities exchange operated by The Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange (an “Uplist Transaction”). The Notes accrue interest at a rate of 6% per annum payable monthly, which increases to 18% upon an event of default. In addition, under the Notes upon an event of default the Company is required to pay 20% of its consolidated revenues monthly on each interest payment date in reduction of the principal amount of the Notes then outstanding. 

The Notes provide for certain events of default which include failure of the Uplist Transaction to occur by the maturity date, failure to maintain effectiveness of the registration statement under the Registration Rights Agreement (as described below), suspension of trading of the Company’s common stock for five consecutive trading days, failure to timely deliver shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes or exercise of the Warrants, failure to timely make payments under the Notes, default under other indebtedness, and certain other customary events of default, subject to certain exceptions and limitations. 

F-45

Upon an event of default, the holders will have the right to require the Company to prepay the Notes at a 125% premium. Further, upon a bankruptcy event of default or a change of control event, the Company will be required to prepay the Notes at a premium. If the conversion price falls below $0.25, the Company may also elect to prepay the notes at a 125% premium. 

Pursuant to the Notes, upon an event of default one of the investors is entitled to cause Jonathan Read, the Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company, to resign from his positions with the Company. Mr. Read executed and delivered to the investor an undated letter of resignation to that effect, which the investor may cause to be dated and released upon the occurrence of an event of default. 

The Notes are convertible upon the earlier of the Uplist Transaction and an event of default at a conversion price equal to the greater of (a) 90% of the lowest volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) for the 10 trading days prior to the conversion date and (b) $0.25 per share, subject to adjustment including downward adjustment upon any dilutive issuance of securities. Each holder’s conversion is subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation which may be increased to 9.99% on 61 days’ notice from the holder. 

The Notes contain customary restrictive covenants including covenants against incurring new indebtedness or liens, changing the nature of its business, transfers of assets, transactions with affiliates, and issuances of securities, subject to certain exceptions and limitations. 

The Company repaid its existing line of credit with Western Alliance Bank which had an existing balance of approximately $59,000. Under the Notes the Company can enter into a factoring agreement of $2 million using the Company’s accounts receivable as collateral. 

The Warrants entitle the holders to purchase a total of 1,666,666 shares of common stock for a five-year period from issuance, at an exercise price determined as follows: (i) beginning on the issuance date and for a period of 90 days thereafter, $0.78, (ii) if the Uplist Transaction has occurred as of the date of exercise, the lower of (A) $0.78 and (B) 110% of the per share offering price to the public in the Uplist Transaction, and (iii) if neither of (i) and (ii) apply, the lower of (A) $0.78 and (B) 90% of the lowest VWAP for the 10 trading days prior to the date of the exercise, subject to adjustment including downward adjustment upon any dilutive issuance of securities. If the Uplist Transaction is not completed prior to the maturity date of the Notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the Warrants will be doubled, without an adjustment to the exercise price. 

Each holder’s exercise is subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation which may be increased to 9.99% on 61 days’ notice from the holder. The Warrants may be exercised cashlessly if the registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise is not effective as required under the Registration Rights Agreement. 

The SPA, Warrants and Notes require a reserve of authorized but unissued shares of common stock initially equal to approximately 15,000,000 shares of common stock, subject to reduction as the Notes and Warrants are converted and exercised, respectively. 

Spartan Capital Securities, LLC (the “Placement Agent”) served as placement agent in the offering and received a cash commission in the amount of 8% of the gross proceeds, or $240,000. In addition, we have agreed to pay the Placement Agent an expense allowance of $30,000. Furthermore, we agreed to issue the Placement Agent five-year warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock equal to 8% of the total number of shares of common stock underlying the Notes and Warrants sold in the offering, or 1,200,000 shares. The Placement Agent Warrants have an exercise price of 110% of the Warrant exercise price. 

Under the SPA the Company reimbursed the Buyers a total of $60,000 out of the proceeds from the offering for fees and expenses incurred in connection therewith. 

In connection with the SPA, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement pursuant to which it agreed to register the resale by the Buyers of the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes and Warrants. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the initial registration statement on Form S-1 must be filed 30 days after the Notes become convertible, and to cause the registration statement to be declared effective within 90 days thereafter, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. The Lenders required us to terminate the Financing Agreement as a condition of lending us the $3 million and our issuance of the Notes.

In early January 2023 the Company executed a reduction in force benefiting from the synergies of its two US operation and incurred nominal termination costs as a result.

On January 31, 2023, the Company entered into a Termination and Release Agreement (“Agreement”) with John Regazzi, in which Mr. Regazzi resigned as a full-time employee and officer of the Company, effective immediately. Mr. Regazzi remains a director of the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company has paid or agreed to pay Mr. Regazzi (i) $17,500 in unpaid expenses, (ii) $82,266 in unpaid deferred salary, (iii) $100,000 in an unpaid bonus related to the acquisition of GWW payable in essentially equal installments over an 18-month commencing in January 2024, (iv) $325,000 in retirement compensation payable over an 18-month period commencing in January 2024, and (v) COBRA reimbursement until such time as he can transition to Medicare. Mr. Regazzi is remaining as a part-time employee though June 30, 2025 at a rate of $125 per hour and will be paid the $36,000 he is owed for paid time-off over next 12 months ending on January 31, 2024.

On February 13, 2023, the company filed an S-1 registration statement for Ault Alliance, Inc. to distribute shares of common stock of the Company on a pro rata basis to the holders of Ault common stock.

F-46

On March 6, 2023, Ault provided to the Company $249,500 towards the outstanding balance of the Secured Note (see Note 13. Notes Payable, Related Parties, net)

On March 24, 2023, Ault provided to the Company $31,930 towards the outstanding balance of the Secured Note (see Note 13. Notes Payable, Related Parties, net)

On April 6, 2023, Ault provided to the Company $250,000 towards the outstanding balance of the Secured Note (see Note 13. Notes Payable, Related Parties, net)

On April 7, 2023, Ault provided to the Company $103,000 towards the outstanding balance of the Secured Note (see Note 13. Notes Payable, Related Parties, net)

On April 21, 2023, Ault provided to the Company $50,000 towards the outstanding balance of the Secured Note (see Note 13. Notes Payable, Related Parties, net)

On April 21, 2023 Will Horne and Lutz Henckels each provided to the Company a $50,000 loan at zero percent interest. The notes are due on May 15, 2023.

On May 11, 2023, Ault provided to the Company $150,000 towards the outstanding balance of the Secured Note (see Note 13. Notes Payable, Related Parties, net)

F-47

70,077,753 Shares of Common Stock

 

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED

 


PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

The date of this Prospectus is _______, 2023

 

 

F-48

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 

ITEMItem 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

 

The following table sets forthprovides information regarding the costsvarious actual and anticipated expenses payable by us in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being registered. None of the following expenses are payable by the Selling Securityholders.registered hereby. All of the amounts shown are estimates except for the SEC registration fee.

 

Nature of Expense Amount 
SEC registration fee $599.15  $3,243.72 
Accounting fees and expenses  * 

Legal fees and expenses

  30,000.00   * 

Accounting fees and expenses

  5,000.00 
Printing expenses  * 

Miscellaneous

      * 

TOTAL

 $35,599.15 
    
Total $* 

*To be completed by amendment.

 

ITEMItem 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

 

The Company’sforegoing discussion relates to California law since we are a California corporation. On September 8, 2022, our shareholders approved reincorporation in Delaware. That reincorporation is pending FINRA approval.

Under Section 317 of the California Corporations Code, or the CGCL, a California corporation has the power to indemnify any person who was or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor) by reason, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that he or she is or was an agent of the corporation, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the proceeding if that person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and, in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

In addition, an California corporation shall have power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that the person is or was an agent of the corporation, against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by that person in connection with the defense or settlement of the action if the person acted in good faith, in a manner the person believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders, provided that no indemnification shall be made for any of the following (1) with respect to any claim, issue, or matter as to which such person has been adjudged to have been liable to the corporation in the performance of that person’s duty to the corporation and its shareholders, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the proceeding is or was pending shall determine upon application that, in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for expenses and then only to the extent that the court shall determine; (2) of amounts paid in settling or otherwise disposing of a pending action without court approval; or (3) of expenses incurred in defending a pending action which is settled or otherwise disposed of without court approval.

Section 317 of the CGCL also provides that, to the extent that an agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits in the defense of any proceeding referred to in either of the foregoing paragraphs or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, the agent shall be indemnified against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the agent in connection therewith.

Section 317 of the CGCL also provides that to the extent that an agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits in defense of any proceeding referred to above or in defense of any claim, issue, or matter therein, the agent shall be indemnified against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the agent in connection therewith.

II-1

Except as provided in the paragraph above, any indemnification shall be made by the corporation only if authorized in the specific case, upon a determination that indemnification of the agent is proper in the circumstances because the agent has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth above, by any of the following: (1) a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who are not parties to such proceeding, (2) if such a quorum of directors is not obtainable, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, (3) approval of the shareholders (Section 153), with the shares owned by the person to be indemnified not being entitled to vote thereon, or (4) The court in which the proceeding is or was pending upon application made by the corporation or the agent or the attorney or other person rendering services in connection with the defense, whether or not the application by the agent, attorney or other person is opposed by the corporation.

Our Articles of Incorporation provide that the liability of our directors for monetary damages shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California law. Our Articles of Incorporation also provide that we are authorized to provide indemnification of directors and other agents for breach of duty to the corporation and its shareholders through bylaw provisions or through agreements with the agents, or both, in excess of the indemnification otherwise permitted by Section 317 of the California Corporations Code,CGCL, subject only to the limitations on excess indemnification set forth in Section 204 of the California Corporations CodeCGCL with respect to actions for breach of duty to the corporation and its shareholders. The Company’s bylaws

Our Bylaws provide that the Companywe shall indemnify any person who is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding by reason of the fact that that person is or was an agentour agent.

In addition, we have entered into agreements with each of directors and executive officers in which we agree to indemnify them for certain expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by them in any action or proceeding, including any action by us or in our right, arising out of the Company. The Company also maintains officers and director’s liability insurance.person’s services as a director or officer of ours or any other company or enterprise to which the person provides services at our request, to fullest extent permitted until California law, subject to certain exceptions.

 

ITEMItem 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

 

The followingSet forth below is a summary of transactions in the past three years involving sales of our securities that were soldnot registered under the Securities Act, all of which were consummated pursuant to the exemption afforded under Section 4(a)(2) ofnoted in the Securities Act of 1933.  Proceeds are or will be used for general corporate purposes.

On September 28, 2018, we sold 400 Series E Shares to approximately five investors at the price of $25.00 per share. We also issued to Emerging Growth Equities Ltd a warrant purchase 1,000 shares of common stock at the price of $0.25 per share.

On September 21, 2018, we sold 1,260 Series E Shares to approximately five investors at the price of $25.00 per share. We also issued to Emerging Growth Equities Ltd a warrant purchase 3,150 shares of common stock at the price of $0.25 per share.

On August 27, 2018, we sold 6,500 Series E Shares to approximately five investors at the price of $25.00 per share. We also issued to Emerging Growth Equities Ltd a warrant purchase 16,250 shares of common stock at the price of $0.25 per share.

On August 17, 2018, we sold 7,840 Series E Shares to approximately five investors at the price of $25.00 per share. We also issued to Emerging Growth Equities Ltd a warrant purchase 29,600 shares of common stock at the price of $0.25 per share.

On August 2, 2018, we sold 1,400 Series E Shares to approximately five investors at the price of $25.00 per share. We also issued to Emerging Growth Equities Ltd a warrant purchase 3,500 shares of common stock at the price of $0.25 per share.

On June 7, 2018, we sold 400 Series E Shares to approximately two investors at the price of $25.00 per share. We also issued to Emerging Growth Equities Ltd a warrant purchase 1,000 shares of common stock at the price of $0.25 per share.

On May 9, 2018, we sold 2,400 Series E Shares to approximately two investors at the price of $25.00 per share. We also issued to Emerging Growth Equities Ltd a warrant purchase 6,000 shares of common stock at the price of $0.25 per share.

On April 6, 2018 we sold 6,000 Series E Shares to approximately three investors at the price of $25.00 per share. We also issued to Emerging Growth Equities Ltd a warrant purchase 13,000 shares of common stock at the price of $0.25 per share.

II-1

On March 26, 2018, we issued 150,000 shares of our common stock to Partners for Growth V, L.P. (“PFG”) in exchange for PFG’s agreement to eliminate the “put” feature of certain warrants that we had previously issued. 

On March 20, 2018, in consideration of his agreement to join us an executive officer and employee, we granted Lutz P. Henckels, a director and our acting chief financial officer, an option to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock at the price of $0.33 per share based on reliance on the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  One fourth of the option vests on the first anniversary of the grant date and 1/48 of the option vests on each of the 36 months thereafter.

On January 29, 2016, we sold 2,787,872 units, each consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.75 shares of common stock, to approximately 20 investors. The purchase price for each unit was $1.24375. Each warrant represented the right to purchase one share of our common stock at the price of $1.15 per share.

ITEM 16.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.footnotes.

 

 

3.1Name or
Class of

Investor

Articles

Date of IncorporationSaleNo. of SecuritiesReason for
Issuance
An executive officerJanuary __, 202310Waiver of severance due to the Business Combination
An executive officerJanuary __, 202310Waiver of severance due to the Business Combination
Two accredited investorsJanuary 11, 2023$3,300,000 10% original issue discount Senior Secured Convertible notes and 5 year Warrants (1)Securities Purchase Agreement
Ault Alliance, Inc.December 31, 2022$4,382,740 Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note (2)Exchange Agreement
Ault Lending, LLCDecember 31, 2022$6,750,000 10% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note and five-year warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock (1)Securities Purchase Agreement
InvestorSeptember 15, 2022229,268 shares of common stock (3)Cashless exercise of pre-funded warrants
Ault Alliance, Inc.September 8, 20222,920,085 shares of common stock and 514.8 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock (1)Share Exchange Agreement
September 8, 2022$4,250,000 convertible note (1)Securities Purchase Agreement

II-2

Jonathan ReadSeptember 8, 2022299,851 stock options (3)Compensation
Timothy LongSeptember 8, 2022199,900 stock options (3)Compensation
InvestorJuly 1, 20225,000 shares of common stock (3)Issuance
EmployeeApril 25, 202210,000 shares of common stock (3)Compensation
Officers of the Company as amended, incorporated by referenceMarch 7, 2022 and March 8, 202220,200 shares of common stock (3)Compensation for services/Performance awards
Officers of the CompanyDecember 24, 202120,020 shares of common stock (3)Compensation for services/Performance awards
InvestorJune 4, 202181,153 shares of common stock (3)Issuance
Accredited investorsApril 27, 2021Pre-funded warrants to Exhibit 3.1 topurchase an aggregate of 461,538 shares of common stock (3)Securities Purchase Agreement

Name or Class of

Investor

Date of SaleNo. of SecuritiesReason for
Issuance
Directors of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KCompanyApril 16, 202118,000 shares of common stock (3)Compensation for the fiscal year ended services/Performance awards
Two directorsMarch 27, 1999.

21, 2020
10,000 shares of common stock (3)Compensation for services/Performance awards
Two investorsMarch 11, 2020146,668 shares of common stock (1)Securities Purchase Agreement
InvestorMarch 3, 2020805 shares of common stock (3)Issuance
Two investorsMarch 2, 20201,482 shares of common stock (3)Issuance

 

3.2

(1)

Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Preferred Stock Series AExempt under Section 4(a)(2) of the Company, incorporated by referenceSecurities Act and Regulation 506(b) thereunder. The securities were issued to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 27, 1999.

accredited investors and there was no general solicitation.

 

3.3

(2)

Certificate of Determination of Series B Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred StockExempt under Rule 3(a)(9) of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 14, 2011.

Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

3.4

(3)

Certificate of Determination of Series C Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred StockExempt under Section 4(a)(2) of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 25, 2013.

Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

3.5

(4)

Certificate of Determination of Series D Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred StockExempt under Section 4(a)(2) of the Company, incorporated by referenceSecurities Act of 1933, as amended on the basis that the issuance was to Exhibit 3.1a single accredited investor without the use of any general solicitation or advertising to market or otherwise offer the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2013.

securities for sale.

 

3.6

Certificate of Determination of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2018.

107Filing Fee TableFiled

 

3.7

*

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Determination of 6.0% Series E Senior Convertible Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock of the Company, incorporatedTo be filed by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2018.

amendment.

 

3.8

**

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, incorporated by reference toContained in Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2008.

5.1.

 

5.1

Opinion+

Certain exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Sheppard, Mullin, RichterRegulation S-K. The registrant agrees to furnish a copy of the omitted exhibits and Hampton, LLP asschedules to the securities being registered.

SEC on a supplemental basis upon its request.

 

10.1

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its directors and officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 27, 2010.

++
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

10.2

2005 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Attachment A to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on July 21, 2005. *

10.3

Amended and Restated Warrant between the Company and Partners for Growth IV, L.P. dated June 16, 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2014.

10.4

Amended and Restated Warrant between the Company and SVB Financial Group dated June 16, 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2014.

II-2

10.5

Amended and Restated Warrant between the Company and PFG Equity Investors, LLC dated June 16, 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2014.

10.6

Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Alara Capital AVI II, LLC dated June 27, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2013.

10.7

Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Alara Capital AVI II, LLC dated February 16, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2015.

10.8

Warrant to Purchase 898,634 Shares of Common Stock between the Company and Alara Capital AVI II, LLC dated February 16, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8- K filed on February 20, 2015.

10.9

Warrant to Purchase 194,437 Shares of Common Stock between the Company and Alara Capital AVI II, LLC dated February 23, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8- K filed on February 27, 2015.

10.10

Investor Rights Agreement between the Company and Alara Capital AVI II, LLC dated November 10, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 14, 2011.

10.11

Investor Rights Agreement between the Company and Alara Capital AVI II, LLC dated July 8, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 12, 2013.

10.12

Investor Rights Agreement between the Company and Alara Capital AVI II, LLC dated February 16, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2015.

10.13

Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement and Investor Rights Agreement between the Company and Alara Capital AVI II, LLC dated February 23, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2015.

10.14

Severance Agreement between the Company and John R. Regazzi dated June 3, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2010. *

10.15

Lease Agreement between the Company and SF II Creekside LLC dated January 5, 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018.

10.16

Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and Partners for Growth V, L.P. dated April 27, 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018.

10.17

Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and Spanawave Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 8, 2016.

10.18

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 19, 2016, between the Company and individual investors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333- 210157) filed on March 14, 2016.

10.19

Form of Warrant Agreement dated January 29, 2016, between the Company and individual investors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-210157) filed on March 14, 2016.

10.20

Investor Rights Agreement dated January 15, 2016, between the Company and individual investors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018.

II-3

10.21

Investor Rights Agreement dated March 26, 2018, between the Company and the investor parties thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2018.

10.22

Conditional Waiver and Modification to Loan and Security Agreement dated March 26, 2018 between the Company and Partners For Growth incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018.

10.23

Stock Option Award Agreement between the Company and Lutz Henckels dated June 6, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018.*

10.24

2018 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Attachment A to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on July 30, 2018. *

16

Letter from the Company’s former certifying accountants dated January 9, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2018.

19

Significant Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on June 19, 2018)

23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Crowe LLP.

23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Armanino LLP.

23.3

Consent of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter and Hampton, LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).

24

Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

(b) Financial Statements. The financial statements filed as part of this Registration Statement are listed in the index to the financial statements immediately preceding such financials.

 

II-3

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Exhibits

    Incorporated by
Reference
 Filed or
Furnished
Herewith
Exhibit # Exhibit Description Form Date Number  
2.1 Share Exchange Agreement dated as of December 27, 2021 by and among Giga-tronics Incorporated, BitNile Holdings, Inc. and Gresham Worldwide, Inc. 8-K 12/29/2021 10.1  
2.2 Amendment No. 1 to Share Exchange Agreement dated as of December 27, 2021 by and among Giga-tronics Incorporated, BitNile Holdings, Inc. and Gresham Worldwide, Inc. dated April 5, 2022 8-K 4/11/2022 2.2  
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended 10-K 6/21/1999 3.1  
3.1(a) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company 8-K 12/13/2019 3.1  
3.1(b) Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation 8-K 9/27/2022 3.1  
3.1(c) Certificate of Determination of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock 8-K 8/29/2022 3.1  
3.1(d) Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation 8-K 9/27/2022 3.1  
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company 10-K 6/12/2008 3.2  
4.1 Rights Agreement between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC dated as of October 12, 2020 8-K 10/13/2020 4.1  
4.2 Form of Pre-Funded Warrant 8-K 4/30/2021 4.1  
4.3 Form of Amended and Restated Prefunded Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated as of July 29, 2021 10-Q 8/10/2021 10.1  
4.4 Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Gresham Worldwide, Inc. 8-K 4/11/2022 4.1  
4.5 Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of September 6, 2022 between Giga-tronics Incorporated and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC 8-K 9/7/2022 4.2  
4.6 Form of Note* 8-K 1/11/2023 4.1  
4.7 Form of Warrant* 8-K 1/11/2023 4.2  
5.1 Opinion of Nason, Yeager, Gerson, Harris & Fumero, P.A.       Filed
10.1 Share Exchange Agreement dated as of December 27, 2021 by and among Giga-tronics Incorporated, AAI Holdings, Inc. and GWW Worldwide, Inc. 8-K 12/29/2021 10.1  
10.2 Amendment No. 1 to Share Exchange Agreement by and among Giga-tronics Incorporated, AAI Holdings, Inc. and GWW Worldwide, Inc. dated as of April 5, 2022 8-K 4/11/2022 2.2  
10.3 Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its directors and officers 8-K 5/25/2010 10.1  
10.4 2005 Equity Incentive Plan++ DEF 14A 7/21/2005 Attachment A  
10.5 2018 Equity Incentive Plan++ DEF 14A 7/30/2018 Attachment A  
10.6 2023 Equity Incentive Plan++ 10-K 5/11/2023 10.5  
10.7 Stock Option Award Agreement between the Company and Lutz Henckels dated June 6, 2018 10-K 3/31/2018 10.25  
10.8 Form of Option Agreement for Directors under 2018 Equity Incentive Plan 8-K 2/6/2019 10.1  
10.9 Form of Option Agreement for Certain Grants to Executive Officers under 2018 Equity Incentive Plan 8-K 2/6/2019 10.2  
10.10 Form of Option Agreement under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan 8-K 2/6/2019 10.3  
10.11 Form of Option Agreement for Certain Grants to executive Officers under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (one year vesting) 8-K 12/31/2020 10.1  
10.12 Form of Option Agreement under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (one year vesting) 8-K 12/31/2020 10.2  
10.13 Severance Agreement between the Company and John Regazzi dated June 23, 2020 8-K 6/24/2020 10.1  
10.14 Severance Agreement between the Company and Lutz Henckels dated June 23, 2020 8-K 6/24/2020 10.2  

II-4

10.15 Severance Agreement between the Company and Daniel Kirby dated November 26, 2019 10-K 3/28/2020 10.7  
10.16 Severance Agreement between the Company and Armand Pantalone dated March 21, 2019 8-K 3/26/2019 10.2  
10.17 Lease Agreement between the Company and SF II Creekside LLC dated January 5, 2017 10-K 3/31/2018 10.17  
10.18 Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and Certain Investors dated as of April 29, 2021 8-K 4/30/2021 10.2  
10.19 Securities Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and Certain Investors dated as of April 29, 2021 8-K 4/30/2021 10.1  
10.20 Amended and Restated Business Financing Agreement between the Company, MicroSource, Inc. and Western Alliance Bank 8-K 3/14/2019 10.2  
10.21 Secured Promissory Note dated November 12, 2021 8-K 11/18/2021 10.1  
10.22 Security and Pledge Agreement dated November 12, 2021 8-K 11/18/2021 10.2  
10.23 Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note dates as of April 5, 2022 8-K 4/11/2022 10.3  
10.24 Amendment to Security and Pledge Agreement dated April 5, 2022 8-K 4/11/2022 10.4  
10.25 Waiver letter agreement concerning Severance Agreement between Giga-tronics and John Regazzi dated as of December 26, 2021 8-K 12/29/2021 10.4  
10.26 Waiver letter agreement concerning Severance Agreement between Giga-tronics and Lutz P. Henckels dated as of December 22, 2021 8-K 12/29/2021 10.5  
10.27 Waiver letter agreement concerning Severance Agreement between Giga-tronics and Armand Pantalone dated as of December 21, 2021 8-K 12/29/2021 10.6  
10.28 Waiver letter agreement concerning Severance Agreement between Giga-tronics and Daniel Kirby dated as of December 19, 2021 8-K 12/29/2021 10.7  
10.29 Convertible Note 8-K 9/14/2022 10.2  
10.30 Securities Purchase Agreement+ 8-K 9/14/2022 10.3  
10.31 Security Agreement+ 8-K 9/14/2022 10.4  
10.32 Registration Rights Agreement+ 8-K 9/14/2022 10.5  
10.33 Form of Preferred Share Repurchase Agreement+ 8-K 9/14/2022 10.7  
10.34 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement+ 8-K 1/11/2023 10.1  
10.35 Form of Security Agreement+ 8-K 1/11/2023 10.2  
10.36 Form of Subordination Agreement+ 8-K 1/11/2023 10.3  
10.37 Form of Registration Rights Agreement 8-K 1/11/2023 10.4  
10.38 Form of Termination and Release Agreement - Regazzi 8-K 2/7/2023 10.1  
10.39 Form of Exchange Agreement 10-K 5/11/2023 10.38  
10.40 Form of Exchange Note 10-K 5/11/2023 10.39  
10.41 Form of Exchange Security Agreement 10-K 5/11/2023 10.40  
10.42 Form of Exchange Registration Rights Agreement 10-K 5/11/2023 10.41  
10.43 Form of Warrant 10-K 5/11/2023 10.42  
10.44 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement 10-K 5/11/2023 10.43  
10.45 Form of Registration Rights Agreement 10-K 5/11/2023 10.44  
10.46 Form of Secured Convertible Note 10-K 5/11/2023 10.45  
10.47 Form of Security Agreement 10-K 5/11/2023 10.46  
10.48 Form of Guaranty 10-K 5/11/2023 10.47  
10.49 Form of Letter Agreement 10-K 5/11/2023 10.48  
10.50 Form of Stock Option Agreement – Jonathan Read and Tim Long 10-K 5/11/2023 10.49  
10.51 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement – Jonathan Read and Timothy Long 10-K 5/11/2023 10.50  
10.52 Employment Agreement – Jonathan Read++ 10-K 5/11/2023 10.51  
10.53 Employment Agreement – Timothy Long++ 10-K 5/11/2023 10.52  
10.54 Form of Warrant – Zvika Avni 10-K 5/11/2023 10.53  

II-5

10.55 Form of Note – Microphase 10-K 5/11/2023 10.54  
10.56 Form of Warrant – Microphase 10-K 5/11/2023 10.55  
10.57 Stock Purchase Agreement – Relec Electronics Ltd. 10-K 5/11/2023 10.56  
10.58 Email extending November 12, 20221 Note due date 10-K 5/11/2023 10.57  
10.59 Note – Microphase and DPL 10-K 5/11/2023 10.58  
16.1 Letter from Armamino LLP dated August 23, 2022 8-K 8/23/2022 16.1  
21.1 List of Subsidiaries S-1 2/13/2023 21.1  
23.1 Consent of Marcum LLP       Filed
23.2 Consent of Nason, Yeager, Gerson, Harris & Fumero, P.A.       *
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document.        
101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.        
101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.        
101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.        
101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.        
101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.        
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).        
107 Filing Fee Table        

* Contained in Exhibit 5.1. 

+     Certain exhibits and

schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The registrant agrees to furnish a copy of the omitted exhibits and schedules to the SEC on a supplemental basis upon its request.

++ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

(b)   Financial Statements. The financial statements filed as part of this Registration Statement are listed in the index to the financial statements immediately preceding such financial statements, which index to the financial statements is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM

II-6

Item 17. UNDERTAKINGS.Undertakings.

 

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

 

(1)

(1)

To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

 

 

(i)

To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;

Act of 1933;

 

(ii)

To reflect in the prospectusProspectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectusProspectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20%20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.

 

 

(iii)

To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;

 

(2)

(2)

That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

(3)

(3)

To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

 

II-4

(4)

(4)

That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, ifpurchaser:

(i)If the registrant is subjectrelying on Rule 430B:

(A)Each Prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 430C, each prospectus424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the filed Prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration statement; and

(B)Each Prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering other than registration statements relying onmade pursuant to Rule 430B415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A,(x) for the purpose of providing the information required by section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of the date itsuch form of Prospectus is first used after effectiveness.effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the Prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the securities in the registration statement to which that Prospectus relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fi de offering thereof. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectusProspectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectusProspectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use,effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectusProspectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

effective date.

 

 

(5)

II-7

(5)That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, thesecurities:

The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

 

 

(i)

Any preliminary prospectusProspectus or prospectusProspectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

 

 

(ii)

Any free writing prospectusProspectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

 

 

(iii)

The portion of any other free writing prospectusProspectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

 

 

(iv)

Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. 

(6)Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreements certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

(7)The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

 

 

(1)

For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectusProspectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectusProspectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b) (1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

 

 

(2)

For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectusProspectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fidefi de offering thereof.

 

II-8
II-5

Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-3 andregistrant has duly caused this Registration Statementamendment No. 1 to this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Dublin,Scottsdale, State of California,Arizona, on October 17, 2018. July 31, 2023.

 

Giga-tronics Incorporated

GIGA-TRONICS INCORPORATED

By

/s/ John R. Regazzi

By:

/s/ Jonathan Read

John R. RegazziJonathan Read

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each of the undersigned officers and directors does hereby constitute and appoint John R. Regazzi and Lutz P. Henckels, and each of them, or their substitute or substitutes, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power and authorityPursuant to do any and all acts and things and to execute and file or cause to be filed any and all instruments, documents or exhibits which said attorneys and agents, or either one of them, determine may be necessary or advisable or required to enable said corporation to comply with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any rules or regulations or requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this registration statement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing power and authority, the powers granted include the power and authority to sign the names of the undersigned officers and directors in the capacities indicated below to this registration statement, to any and all amendments, both pre-effective and post-effective, and supplements to this registration statement and to any and all instruments, documents or exhibits filed as part of or in conjunction with this registration statement or amendments or supplements thereof, with the powers of substitution and revocation, and each of the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys and agents, or either one of them, or their substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. In witness whereof, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney as of the dates indicated below.

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act, of 1933, as amended, this amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated.July 31, 2023.

 

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Gordon L. Almquist

Director

October 17, 2018

Gordon L. Almquist

   
NamePosition

/s/ Lutz P. Henckels

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

 October 17, 2018

Lutz P. Henckels

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

and Director

  

/s/ Jeffrey Bentz

Jeffrey Bentz

 Director
  

/s/ John R. RegazziWilliam B. Horne

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive

 October 17, 2018

John R. Regazzi

Officer) and DirectorWilliam B. Horne

 Director
  

/s/ William J. ThompsonJonathan Read

Jonathan Read

Director and Chairman of the Board

 October 17, 2018

William J. Thompson

 Director
  

/s/ Jamie WestonJohn R. Regazzi

John R. Regazzi

Director

 October 17, 2018

Jamie Weston /s/ Robert Smith

Robert Smith

Director

 

William J. Thompson

Director

 

Thomas E. Vickers

Director

 

II-6

II-9