As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November _______ 2016 January _ 17 _ , 201 6 7 Commission File No.______No. ______ 333-214786

 U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Amendment No. 1 to

FORM S-1

 Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933


AMERI METRO, INC.

(Name of issuer in its charter)


YELLOWWOOD ACQUISITION CORPORATION

(Former name of registrant)


[s120161121r1002.gif]


[s1a1201701_r1002.gif]

Delaware

485112

45-1877342

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification

No.)

2575 Eastern Blvd., Suite 101

York, PA 17402

(717) 434-0668

(Address and telephone number of principal executive office)


 

Plan Inc. Trolly Square, Suite 20C Wilmington Del 19806 1-800-462-4633

(Name, address and phone number of agent for service)


Copies of communications to:

McMurdo Law Group, LLC, 28 West 44th Street, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10036, (917) 318-2865318-2865


Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the registration statement becomes effective.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box x

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.o

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.o

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large Accelerated filer  [  ]Filer

p

Accelerated filer  [  ]Filer

p

Non-accelerated filer [  ]Filer

p

 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company [X]

x

(do not check if smaller reporting company)

1


Calculation of registration fee

Title of Each

Class Of

Securities To Be

Registered

Amount To Be

Registered

Proposed Maximum

Offering 

Price Per Share (1)

Proposed Maximum

Aggregate 

Offering Price (1)

Amount of

Registration Fee

(1)

Amount To Be

Registered

Proposed Maximum

Offering 

Price Per Share (1)

Proposed Maximum

Aggregate 

Offering Price (1)

Amount of

Registration Fee(1)

Common stock,

$.000001 par value per share

 

1,000,000

 

$

60.00

 

$

60,000,000

 

$

6,954

 

Class B Common stock,

$.000001 par value per share

 

1,000,000

 

$

60.00

 

$

60,000,000

 

$

6,954

 



























 

(1) Fee calculated in accordance with Rule 457(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. Proposed offering price used for calculating the registration fee.

 

The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on the date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on the date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

2



The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The Registrant may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

Preliminary Prospectus,   Subject to completion ______________, 2016201 6 7


AMERI METRO, INC.

[s120161121r1004.gif][s1a1201701_r1004.gif]


    1,000,000 Shares of Class B Common Stock


Ameri Metro, Inc. (ARMT or the Company) is offering a maximum of 1,000,000 Shares of our Class B common stock at , $.000001 par value per share (the Shares) at a price per share of $60.000 , in a best effort, underwritten public offering. We have yet to not engage d an underwriter. However, we may do so in the future. In the event we engage an underwriter, we will file a post-effective amendment to update our prospectus and will file the applicable underwriting agreement. There is no minimum proceeds threshold for the offering. The offering will terminate within 24 months from the date of this prospectus. The Company will retain all proceeds received from these Shares in this offering. The Company has not made any arrangements to place the proceeds in an escrow or trust account. Any proceeds received in this offering may be immediately used by the Company in its sole discretion. There are no minimum purchase requirements for each investor. All proceeds retained by the Company may not be sufficient to continue operations.


ARMT is currently an emerging growth company under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the JOBS Act). The Company has decided that it will opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b). The Company understands that this election is irrevocable.


The Company is not a blank check company because it has a specific business purpose and has no plans or intention to merge with an operating company.  None of the Companys shareholders have plans to enter a change of control or change of management.  None of our current management has previously been involved with a development stage company that did not implement its business plan, that generated no or minimal revenues or was engaged in a change of control.


There is currently no public market for our Shares of common stock.

 

The Company intends to engage a market maker to establish a public market for the Shares being offered herein apply to be listed on NASDAQ.  To be listed on NASDAQ, a market maker must file an application on the Company's behalf to make a market in the common stock.stock the Company must meet certain listing standards . There is no guarantee that the Shares will ever be listed on NASDAQ or any exchange.

3



The Shares being offered are highly speculative and they involve a high degree of risk and should be considered only by persons who can afford the loss of their entire investment. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 8.


Price to 

Public

Underwriting 

Discounts

and 

Commissions(1)

Proceeds to

Company(2)

 

Per Share

 

$

60.00

 

 

$

4.20

 

 

$

55.80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Maximum

 

$

60,000,000

 

 

$

4,200,000


 

$

55,800,000

 

 

(1) Our Shares in this offering will be sold by our officers and directors in a direct offering. However, we may engage an underwriter who would likely incur a seven percent (7%) percent underwriting commission, as reflected above. In the event we engage an underwriter, we will file a post-effective amendment to update our prospectus and will file the applicable underwriting agreement.

(2) The proceeds to us are shown before deduction for legal, accounting, printing and other offering expenses estimated at $100,000.00. ARMT will not use this offering prospectus before the effective date.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


The date of this prospectus is _______ __, 2016

4201 6 7




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

6

 

 

RISK FACTORS

1412

 

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

2119



USE OF PROCEEDS

2120



COMPANY PROJECTIONS                                                                           

2221

 

 

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

2421

 

 

DILUTION OF THE PRICE YOU PAY FOR YOUR SHARES

2421

 

 




PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

27

 

 

BUSINESS

2829

 

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS

7736

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

9040

 

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

9040

 

 

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

9141

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

9544

 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

9846

 

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

9947

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

10048

 

 

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

10149



CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL

DISCLOSURE                                                                               51

108



DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION OF INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

108



51



EXPERTS

10851

 

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

10851

 

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F1-F17X



5



You may only rely on the information contained in this prospectus or that we have referred you to. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities other than the common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any common stock in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made in connection with this prospectus shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this prospectus or that the information contained by reference to this prospectus is correct as of any time after its date.

 

Until December 28 2016 February __ , 201 6 7 all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

 

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

 

The information presented is a brief overview of the key aspects of the offering. The prospectus summary contains a summary of information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. You should carefully read all information in the prospectus, including the financial statements and the notes to the financial statements under the Financial Statements section beginning on page 31 prior to making an investment decision.

 

General Information about our Company

 

Ameri Metro, Inc. (ARMT, or the Company), prior to the merger, discussed below, (Ameri Metro 2010) was incorporated on April 13, 2010 in Delaware with an authorized capitalization of 1,500 Shares of common stock. On April 30, 2010, Ameri Metro 2010 amended its certificate of incorporation to authorize 100,000,000 Shares of common stock with a par value of $.000001 per share and 20,000,000 Shares of preferred stock with a par value of $.0001 per share. Yellowwood was incorporated on September 21, 2011 and had an authorized capitalization of 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock.  The Company has a fiscal year end of July 31.

On September 2, 2014, the Company amended the articles of incorporation to increase the authorized shares. The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have the authority to issue is 12,207,000,000 (Twelve Billion Two Hundred and Seven Million) shares, consisting of 12,007,000,000 (Twelve Billion Seven Million) shares of Common Stock having a par value of $.000001 and 200,000,000 (Two Hundred Million) shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of $.000001 per share.


Common stock is divided into four classes: Common stock class A, par value $.000001, 7,000,000 shares authorized, 1,600,000 shares issued and outstanding. Common stock class B, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 987,934,483988,602,007 shares issued and outstanding; Common stock class C, par value $.000001, 48,000,000 shares authorized, shares issued and outstanding; Common stock class D, par value $.000001, 48,000,000 shares authorized, shares issued and outstanding.


Class A 7,000,000 (Seven Million) these shares have 1000:1 voting right compared to all other Classes of shares, par value .000001. There are 1,600,000 Class A stock outstanding at April 4, 2016. Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares (EPDS) 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion) with no voting rights but with dividend rights, par value $.000001. The Company may issue these shares as it deems necessary, for the purposes including but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations. Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares (EPS) 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion) with no voting rights and no



6



dividend rights, par value $.000001. The Company may issue these shares as its currency as it deems necessary, for the following purposes but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.


The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in series and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.


The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:


A.

The number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;

B.

The dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and, if so, from what date or dates, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of that series;

C.

Whether that series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

D.

Whether that series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

E.

Whether or not that series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates;

F.

Whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of shares of that series, and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

G.

The rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of the shares of that series; and

H.

Any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.


This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect.


Preferred Shares: 200,000,000 (Two Hundred Million) par value .000001. There are 1,800,000 preferred shares outstanding at July 15, 2016.


On November 3, 2014, the Company effected a 4:1 forward stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock. We notified all shareholders by mail at the time of the 4:1 forward split, instructing them to mail a check for one hundred dollars to cover the cost of issuing the shares by the stock transfer agent.  The one hundred dollar cost was associated with fees charged by the stock transfer agent.  When the fee is paid by the shareholder to the stock transfer agent they will issue the 4:1 forward stock split in the shareholders name. The Company has set aside the shares of those associated with the outstanding balance owed in the financial statements. . As a condition of the split, all shareholders who wanted to participate were required to send $100 to the Transfer Agent to pay for the expense related to reissuance of shares due to split. The cut-off date for the return of the notification and payment to the transfer agent was December 31, 2014. If the shareholder did not return the confirmation and payment, they would not be eligible to receive the additional shares. The Company recognizes, at some point, it will be required to issue an additional 2,736,000 of Class B common stock in connection with this stock split as disclosed in the financial statement.


ARMT is currently an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act. A company loses its emerging growth company status on (i) the last day of the fiscal year during which it had total annual gross revenues of $1,000,000,000 or more; (ii) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of its first sale of common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); (iii) the date on which it has, during the previous 3-year period, issued more than $1,000,000,000 in non-convertible debt; or (iv) the date on which it is deemed to be a large accelerated filer, as defined in section 240.12b 2 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor thereto. As an emerging growth company, ARMT is exempt from certain obligations of the Exchange Act including those found in Section 14A(a) and (b) related to shareholder



7



approval of executive compensation and golden parachute compensation. Furthermore, Section 103 of the JOBS Act provides that as an emerging growth company, ARMT is not required to comply with the requirement to provide an auditors attestation of ICFR under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for as long as ARMT qualifies as an emerging growth company. However, an emerging growth company is not exempt from the requirement to perform managements assessment of internal control over financial reporting.


The Company is focused on development of transportation facilities, including but not limited to high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation related and ancillary transportation businesses, inland ports, sea ports, airports, and toll roads for the affiliated companies.


The Company is contracted to build, manufacturing facilities for composite rebar, rail road ties and Damar Corporation LLC products, truck bed liners and storage boxes for construction vehicles. in addition to fiber optic lines, any and all utilities whether underground or overhead, any and all outdoor advertisement signage, travel plazas, natural gas pipelines, distillate pipelines, motels, hotels, sewer, power grids, cell phone towers, earth stations, fast food and restaurant establishments, shops and other aspects of construction, technology parks, together with ancillary land development projects, sale of goods and services to government, civilian and commercial end users.  The Company is focused on development of transportation facilities, including but not limited to high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related and ancillary transportation businesses, inland ports, sea ports, airports, and toll roads. The Company intends to secure manufacturing and technologies together with ancillary land development projects, sale of goods and services to government, civilian and commercial end users.

On June 12, 2012, Ameri Metro 2010 merged with Yellowwood Acquisition Corporation, a public reporting company. As part of the merger, Yellowwood Acquisition Corporation, the surviving entity, changed its name to Ameri Metro, Inc. Yellowwood has an authorized capitalization of 1,000,000,000 Shares of common stock and 20,000,000 Shares of preferred stock. The

Company has a fiscal year end of July 31.Yellowwood had no ongoing business or operations and was established for the purpose of completing mergers and acquisitions with a target company, such as the former Ameri Metro 2010.  


The Company is a development stage company and has no operating history and has experienced losses since its inception. The Company has received only minimal revenue from earlier consulting work. The Companys independent auditors have issued a report questioning the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.


Since its incorporation, the Company has developed its business plan, appointed officers and directors, engaged initial project consultants and entered into negotiations and contracts for related and ancillary business. The Company is engaged in development of transportation complex which consist of toll road, inland port and airport.


On December 1, 2010, the Company formed its wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure, Inc. (GTI). in the state of Delaware with an authorized capital of 100,000,000 Shares of common stock with a par value of $.0001 and 20,000,000 Shares of preferred stock with a par value of $.0001.  GTI was formed to provide development and construction services for the Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. ("ATFI", a non-profit company supported by the State of Alabama to act as the exclusive entity as set forth in H.J.R 459 and H.J.R. 456 project developer for such a toll road an on which the former CEO of ARMT Shah Mathias served as one of its four directors) including securing financing for the design, planning, engineering and related costs for its construction and to engage in the construction of high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related transportation projects for the Company.


The Business


The Company, herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44, is focused on development of transportation facilities, including but not limited to high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related and ancillary transportation businesses, inland ports, sea ports, airports, and toll roads.roads for the affiliated companies . The Company is contracted to intends to secure manufacturingbuild, manufactur ing facilities for ing and technologies composite rebar, rail road ties and Damar Corporation LLC products, in addition to fiber optic lines, any and all utilities whether underground or overhead, any and all outdoor advertisement signage, travel plazas, natural gas pipelines, distillate pipelines, motels, hotels, sewer, power grids, cell phone towers, earth stations, fast food and restaurant establishments, shops and other aspects of  technolog construction, technology parks, ies town Centers, together with ancillary land development projects, sale of goods and services to government, civilian and commercial end users. 

The Company anticipates that it will, directly or through subsidiaries or affiliates, develop plans, and then coordinate and supervise the financing, construction and development of such transportation projects by bringing together the resources, plans, financing, approvals and technology needed to implement such transportation systems.

[s120161121r1006.gif]



8The debt offering of the projects mentioned above will be borne by each affiliated entity or entities via bond offerings. The Company will provide construction services for fee and consulting services for fee. For more information see Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44.



[s1a1201701_r1006.gif]

[s1a1201701_r1008.gif]

The Company has not yet commenced its revenue producing operations; operations . ;however, The Company it has been in joint meetings with affiliate entities and private entities, public municipalities and regional governmental agencies. The Company and affiliate entities met meeting with and making with and ma de king presentations to these parties , associated with projects it intends to be the super general contractor to develop, including parties in the United States relatedrelat ing ed to a sea port s, and a airports, rail project.corridors, toll roads, inland ports, intermodal facilities, sewer, water and power grids, all being revenue producing project s .

 The Company recognizes the $57 Trillion Dollar Infrastructure Market as identified in McKinseys report, believes that the need , demand and demand and usage of for alternative transportation , such as  high speed rail, sea ports , intermodal ports and toll roads , Boeing reports and Society of Civil Engineers are reports. It is increasingly important as the United States adopts policies to attempt to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels and to improve its infrastructure and transportation systems. systems for global competiveness . The Companys intention is to profit from such opportunities and has structured itself to be the leading provider of such services in the United States and globally. The Company intends to develop and prepare the designs and concepts for feasible and profitable regional transportation and infrastructure related projects utilizing existing and new infrastructure. The Company will prepare the complete project package including appraisals and estimates and will obtain contracts for the development of the facilities and infrastructure and purchase of the equipment. The Company will present the complete project, working as project supervisor and coordinator, to municipalities and regional government agencies. 

The current project beyond the planning stage is Port Trajan:

The following discussion is contingent on subsequent financing being obtained.

On August 8, 2016, Company entered into a M material D definitive A agreement for construction (Construction Agreement) with Port De Claudius, Inc. (PDC). Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the Company shall perform all tasks and actions required to develop and construct the Port Trajan Pa. commercial properties (the Project) and to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering, and related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project. Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the specifications, designs, construction standards, subcontractor agreements, insurance requirements, hiring and employment policies and similar items shall be developed by the Company, subject to approval by PDC. The Company shall assure that the Project is constructed according to specifications and requirements imposed by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PADOT) and the Federal Highway Administration. The Company shall supervise all phases of the construction of the Project, and it shall be responsible to PDC for all acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, agents, consultants and other parties under its control. The Company shall be responsible for assuring that the construction of the Project is performed in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the highest standards of care for the industry.

The Project consists of two phases, phase one closing to take place on or before September 21, 2016 (Phase One) and phase two to take place on or before August 31, 2017. Phase One consists of land purchase and onsite /off site improvement and its estimated cost, for both phases, is Two Billion Dollars ($2,000,000,000), at cost plus forty percent (40%), plus two percent (2%) for the increase in inflation regardless of the cost to the Company to perform the required services. In no event will the profit to the Company from the amount paid by PDC be less than Eight Hundred Million Dollars ($800,000,000). A mobilization fee of $2,729,514 shall be due and payable by PDC to the Company upon the closing of Bond funding for Phase One.

On September 11, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement of sale and or assignment of assets in Phase One (the Sale Agreement) with Jewel's Real-Estate 10-86 Master LLLP (the Seller), Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc., division of Hi Speed Rail Facilities Inc. (the Financier), PDC, and HSRF Statutory Trust as Trustee (the "Trustee"), as dictated by the Construction Agreement. The Sale Agreement was thereafter amended on September 13, 2016, in order to change the closing date of the transaction to October 14, 2016. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement, the Company and the Seller shall sell and assign all rights, title and interest in and to any contractual agreements to PDC on completion of Phase One, as governed by the Construction Agreement. The cost of Phase One is $950,000,000. The net Phase One revenue to the Company is $66,719,514. For more information see Exhibit 10.40, 10.41, 10.42, 10.43, 10.44.

Funding for individual projects of the Company  will occur from bond offerings, as noted  herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44, organized through various nonprofit entities, High Speed Rail Facilities Inc., High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc., Alabama Toll Facilities Inc., Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority Inc. and organizations sponsored or affiliated with municipal and government agencies as well as from issuances of stock and debt-financing.  Certain of these nonprofit entities or organizations may themselves be affiliated with, or related to, the Company and assist, or work in conjunction with, the Company in securing contracts and funds to develop projects.

ThroughAs to the relationship of affiliated companies, the Company holds 25% non-voting, non-control interest of each affiliated company and 75% of the ownership is under the interest of Mr. Mathias. The affiliated companies provide the work order to the Company and wholly owned subsidiary, Global Transportation Infrastructure Inc. (GTI) as super general contractor services. The Companys facilitation is limited to assisting the introduction of certain trades project package, including appraisals, estimates, obtaining contracts and sub-contractors, for the development of the facilities and infrastructure projects. The Company will assist affiliated entities at a cost plus up to forty percent fee, for presenting the complete project, working as project supervisor and coordinator between non-profit entities and affiliate entities, which are working with private entities, public municipalities and regional governmental agencies. For more information see Exhibit 10.52, 10.53, 10.54, 10.55.  

Currently also, t T hrough its its wholly owned subsidiarysubsidiary , GTI, the Company is also involved in the planning of the future development of a new toll road in the southeast United States. The Company through assignment of rights from Penndel Land Company( For more information see Exhibit 10.45, 10.46, 10.47 ) , to finance, develop and construction a 357 mile toll road in the State of Alabama as outlined in Alabama House Joint Resolution H. J. R. 459 & H. J. R. 456 .  For more information see Exhibit 10.14 herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44.10.44 . The Company acquired from Penndel Land Company (majority owned by theformer CEO of ARMT)ARMT Mr. Shah Mathias ) the contract rights to a construction agreement with the ATFI, a non-profit company supported by the State of Alabama to act as the exclusive entity as set forth in H.J.R 459 and H.J.R. 456 project developer for such a toll road an on which theformer CEO of ARMTMr. Mathias served as one of its four directors. When the Company secures financing, ATFI will effect a bond offering to purchase the land on which the toll road is to be located.


9



In support of H.J.R. 459 and H.J.R.456 the following ancillary projects are being planned.


1.

Design built inland port called Port De Claudius-Claudius - herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

2.

Design built airport called Sarah Jewel Mathias International Airport (KSJM) herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

3.

Design built air cargo port called Port of Ostia herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

4.

Design built railroad and train stations herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

5.

Design built Fiber Optic Lines herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

6.

Design built All Utilities underground or overhead herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

7.

Design built Power Grids herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

8.

Design built Cell Phone Towers herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

9.

Design built Motels, Travel Plazas, Fast Food Establishments herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

10.

Design built Outdoor Advertisements, Signage herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;

11.

Design built Natural Gas Pipelines & Distillate Pipelines herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 ;


Shah Mathias, founder , of the Company, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company, has established a series of corporations (affiliate entities) with which to effect the transactions and development of the projects envisioned by the Company including the Port Trajan Facility , herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 , high speed rail projects and the Alabama Toll Road.  The Company has envisioned long-range ideas and plans to develop currently undeveloped areas through which the planned Alabama toll road will traverse. These plans include the development of an airport, sea shipping port and a high speed rail line.


For the purpose of this Registration Statement, affiliated companies are defined as entities where the Company holds a 25% ownership interest, non-voting, non-controlling shareholder interest per the Opportunity License Agreement. For more information see Exhibit 10.51.


The Company has developed a mechanism for its sustainability and as to conducting contractual relationships with each affiliated company (s) to maintain its independence and risk mitigation.


Below are the three steps the Company interface s with the affiliate entities:

Step 1 - as consultant for fee

Step 2 - as provider for construction services for fee

Step 3 - as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue)


Post Construction Revenue: Are those revenues that are sustained per the affiliate operations and are a direct result of 25% ownership interest, non-voting, non-controlling shareholder interest, in the affiliated company or companies.


Affiliated Companies:

1.

HSR Freight line, Inc. Designed to handle all services for use of track time and trains for freight and freight forwarding services.

2.

HSR Passenger Services, Inc. Designed to handle rail ticketing booking, reservations, and food services.

3.

HSR Technologies, Inc. Designed to handle all building of suites and manufacturing of trains and rail tracks and provide fiber optics, telecommunications, and related technologies services.

4.

HSR Logistics, Inc. Designed to handle all purchasing functions.

5.

KSJM International Airport, Inc. Designed to eventually create an airport facility in inland Alabama

6.

Port Of Ostia, Inc. Designed to handle all air cargo if and when an airport facility is created.

7.

Port of De Claudius, Inc. Designed to handle sea container and port operations.

8.

AMERI Cement, Inc. Designed to handle cement needs for building projects including Alabama toll road.

9.

Lord Chauffeurs LTD: Designed to operate all passenger ground transportation.

10.

Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc. Designed to provide utility and maintenance service to above entities.

11.

Penn Insurance Services LLC. Designed to provide insurance service to above entities.

12.

Cape Horn Abstracting, Co. Designed to land title examination services.

13.

Eastern Development & Design, Inc.  Designed to provide all civil engineering and architectural service.

14.

Slater & West, Inc.  Designed to handle contract administration services and work force H R matters.

15.

Malibu Homes, Inc. Designed to establish residential home building services.

16.

Platinum Media, Inc. Designed to provide all media related services.



10



Eastern Development and Design (ED&D) (Other Related Party Agreements) to do all the civil engineering work for the toll road, Port De Claudius, KSJM and Port of Ostia. ED&D is an experienced civil engineering company that has been operating since 1993.


The Company has, via ED&D, engaged Armstrong Consulting Inc., for the airport engineering and planning. Armstrong Consulting Inc. is an experienced airport planning and engineer design company. It will engineer and design standards from FAA AC150/5300-13 airport design and FAR PART 77.


The Company has approached a major aircraft manufacturer to help launch air cargo operation at KSJM and Port of Ostia. A major aircraft manufacturer has indicated that the Company should move forward with its business plan.


Relco has been engaged by HSR Technologies, to provide exclusive use of DMU rail technologies and use its know-how for manufacturing of train sets meeting the 49 CFR Part 238 compliant DMU in current venue service that meets or exceeds new Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and America Public Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specification. Relco is a fifty year old company and has provided services for Union Pacific, CSX Transportation, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Kansas City Southern Railway, Canadian National and numerous others.


The Company will build seventeen hundred miles of railroad tracks in parallel with ATFI. The Company has plans, through its affiliates, to build four tracks north and south bound, two tracks for passenger services and two tracks for freight. Volkmann Railroad Builders has been engaged by ARMT to construct and built the railroad. Volkmann is a thirty five year old company that has built railroads for NASA, the mining industry, oil and gas exploration and freight carriers.


The Company has engaged consultants such as Transportation Economics Management System Inc. (TEMS). TEMS (Other(Other Related Party Agreements) is a global transportation consulting firm. It is responsible for the transportation planning and system analysis, which includes the development of the passenger and freight forecasting models.


The Company has engaged with Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS), herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44, to manage and act as port agent at Port Claudius and Port Of Ostia. ISS is a global operation from sixty eight countries, six hundred ports that directs traffic from sea and air cargo to and from the ports. They have been in business since 1875.


NP&G Innovations Inc. has been engaged to manufacturer railroad ties for the company, through HSR Technologies. NP&G is the original inventors of green technology railroad ties. Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) has been engaged to manufacture the composite rebar, through HSR Technologies for the company. MCT is the original developer of technology of the composite rebar. The Company will need approximately four hundred million linear feet of composite rebar to be used in building the Alabama Toll Road.


ARMT entered into a contract on June 10, 2010 for the acquisition of the patents, rights, titles, and business of Damar Corporation LLC, the inventor/developer/manufacturer of Damar TruckDeck. The Damar TruckDeck is a flexible truck deck storage and organization system with an integrated frame allowing the cargo deck to be used as a hauling surface. ARMT shall receive all rights and title to the patents, the TruckDeck system, and all related assets for a purchase price of $750,000 payable as $500,000 cash and the remaining $250,000 payable in the form of 7,500 shares of ARMTs common stock. The cash portion is payable within 90 days of the successful completion of the registration as a publicly traded company pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. The intended use of these assets will equip Company field construction vehicle fleets with the needed tool storage containment and hauling capabilities. The Company will also capitalize on the opportunity of marketing these products to the United States consumer market through existing relationships by Damar Corporation LLC and large big box retail chains.

PAYMENT: $500,000

Purchase Secured the technology to manufacture composite Re-bar. (C RB). Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) has been engaged to manufacture the composite rebar, through HSR Technologies for the Company. MCT is the original developer of technology of the composite rebar. The Company will need approximately four hundred million linear feet of composite rebar to be used in building the Alabama Toll Road. The Company will also sell the rebar to others for commercial use.

Purchase  Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) offers a plant set up and licence to manufacture the rebar contract for their Secured the technology to manufacture composite Re-bar. (C RB). The Company will pay $4,750,000 to HSR Technologies for customizing composite rebar manufacturing facilities, to meet the Alabama Toll Road Specifications. For more information see Exhibit 10.48.


PAYMENT: $4,750,000


On March 1, 2011, the Company entered into a three month agreement with Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) regarding consulting services in relation to the development of high-speed rail and other transportation



11



projects by the Company.  The agreement was initially extended until March 1, 2012 and subsequently extended until September 2013.  Compensation for services under the agreement may not exceed $135,408 unless otherwise authorized by a supplemental agreement.  Currently, the project is anticipated to cost $460,000 and will take six months to complete including presentation to potential investors.


PAYMENT: $460,000


NPG Innovations NPG. entered into an exclusive licensing agreement rights involving two US patents, to manufacture composite rail road ties to  / HSR Technologies, Inc.  The Company has agreed to purchase from HSR Technologies those exclusive licensing agreement rights for $8,000,000. The Company intends to use the rail road tie technology in the future rail projects when the projects are funded.  The Company also has the right to exploit the intellectual property in other world markets as well. For more information see Exhibit 10.49. RAIL TIE Licensing of Intellectual exclusive licensing agreement involving two US patents.patents .


PAYMENT: $8,000,000.


US Railcar Company. / HSR Technologies, Inc.

Exclusive Technology use Agreement

For exclusive use of DMU rail technologies and use of its know-how for manufacturing

Ofo O f train sets meeting the 49 CFR Part 238 compliant DMU in current revenue service .

That meets or exceeds new Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and American Public

Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specifications.

US Railcar entered into a technology use agreement with HSR Technologies, Inc. The Company has agreed to purchase those rights from HSR Technologies for $25,000,000. The Company intends to use train sets in the future rail projects when the projects are funded. The Company also has the right to exploit the sale of train sets in other world markets as well. For more information see Exhibit 10.50.


PAYMENT: $25,000,000.

12



The Terms of the Offering

                                                                 

Securities Being Offered   

Up to 1,000,000 Shares of Class B common stock


Minimum Securities Being

Offered:

There is no minimum number of Shares that need to be purchased for the Offering to be consummated.


Initial Offering Price:

We will sell our Shares at a fixed price of $60.00 per share.  This price was determined by Pro Advisor Inc.


Compensation:

No compensation will be paid to any officer or director in connection with the sale of the Shares.


Termination of Offering:

The offering will conclude when all of the1,000,000 Shares of Class B common stock have been sold or 24 months from the date of this prospectus, whichever occurs earlier.  We may decide to terminate the offering for no reason whatsoever at the discretion of our management team.


Risk Factors:

The securities offered hereby involve a high degree of risk and should not be purchased by investors who cannot afford the loss of their entire investment.  See Risk Factors.


Common Stock Issued And

Outstanding Before Offering:

987,934,483 Shares of our common stock are issued and outstanding as of the date of this Prospectus.

                                                       

Common Stock Issued And

Outstanding After Offering:

988,934,483 Shares of common stock.


Use of Proceeds:                                    

We will use the proceeds from the sale of the common stock by the Company for Project Costs including Equipment Expenditures and Working Capital.


13



Financial Summary

 

This financial summary does not contain all the financial information that may be important to you. Therefore, you should carefully read all the information in this prospectus, including the financial statements and their explanatory notes before making an investment decision.

 

We derived the summary financial information from our financial statements appearing in the section in this prospectus entitled "Financial Statements." You should read this summary financial information in conjunction with the section entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis," our financial statements and related notes to the financial statements.


Statement of Operations Information:

For the Year ended July 31, 2016 

Since Inception

Revenues

$

Operating Expenses

$

7,778,084 

Loss From Operations

$

(7,778,084)

Provision for income taxes

$

Net loss

$

(7,791,722)


 

 

 

Since Inception

Revenues

 

$

0

Expenses

 

$

      7,778,084

Profit (Loss) before income taxes

 

$

(7,778,084)

Provision for income taxes

 

$

0

Net loss

 

$

(7,791,722)

 

Balance Sheet Information:

 As of July 31, 2016 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Total Assets

 

$

41,023

 

$

41,023

Total Liabilities

 

$

16,355,273

 

$

16,355,273  

Common stock and paid in capital excluding Stock subscriptions receivable and Preferred stock

 

$

5,582,971

Common stock and paid in capital

 

$

5,581,929

Total stockholders' deficit

 

$

(16,314,250)

 

$

(16,314,250)

 


RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our securities is highly speculative and subject to numerous and substantial risks. These risks are set forth below. You should not invest in the Company unless you can afford to lose your entire investment. Readers are encouraged to review these risks carefully before making any investment decision.



Risks Relating to Ameri Metro, Inc.


The Company's independent auditors have issued a report questioning the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


The report of the Company's independent auditors contained in the Company's financial statements for the period ended July 31, 2015 includes a paragraph that explains that the Company has not establish any source of revenue to cover its operating costs and cash resources of the Company were insufficient to meet its planned business objectives. These matters raise substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern without the influx of capital through the sale of its securities, the issuance of debt or through development of its operations.


Management has no experience in the development of either railway or highway transportation systems and such inexperience may create unexpected or unanticipated problems and/or losses for the Company.




14



Management has limited prior experience in the development of transportation systems, including obtaining the necessary designs, plans, permits, development teams and capital. Such inexperience may lead to the unexpected or unanticipated problems or missteps that could cause the Company losses or delays. Management is in the process of building a team of advisors and experts to assist it in all the stages of the development of such transportation systems but there can be no assurance that those experts are sufficiently experienced to guide the Company to economic success.


We have limited operating history.

The Company has incurred net losses since inception and may continue to incur net losses while it builds its business and as such it may not achieve or maintain profitability. The Companys limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate its business and prospects, and there is no assurance that the business of the Company will grow or that it will become profitable.



The Company has limited operations and its may be unable to fully implement its business planpla n n lays out the conceptual operations of the Company which have not yet been implemented, due to the lack of capital and may face significant obstacles.obstacles requirement of governmental approvals and the restrictions from governmental regulations .


The Company has a business plan which sets out its conceptual design to plan and develop, transportation systems. In addition to the need to obtain capital for the implementation of its business plan, the Company will face significant other obstacles in planning and effecting regional transportation systems. As the Company develops its plan for developing transportation systems, it may be required to obtain governmental and environmental approvals and possibly be subject to approval by local or state voting propositions, referendums or state legislatures. There is no guarantee we will be able to obtain such approvals.  In addition, the Company may not be able to obtain the land on which transportation systems are proposed and may have to seek government condemnation of such land, which may not be possible. These and other unforeseen obstacles may present significant obstacles to the ability of the Company to implement its business plan.

The Company may be unable to fully implement its business plan due to environmental restrictions.

The Companys planned operations could have a significant impact on the environment in the areas where we plan to operate. As such, the Company may be required to get approvals from environmental agencies or amend, alter, or roll back its operations, so as to remain in compliance with environmental regulations.


The Company may not be able to purchase the land on which it plans to operate.


T In addition, t he Company may not be able to obtain the land on which transportation systems are proposed and may have to seek government condemnation of such land, which may not be possible. These and other unforeseen obstacles may present significant obstacles to the ability of the Company to implement its business plan.


Our future growth may be limited.

The Companys ability to achieve its objectives and to manage its growth effectively depends upon sufficient funding. To accommodate growth and compete effectively, the Company will need working capital to maintain adequate inventory levels, develop additional procedures and controls and increase, train, motivate and manage its work force. There is no assurance that the Companys personnel, systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support its potential future operations. There is no assurance that the Company will generate revenues .

We will need additional financing in order to grow our business and to meet the financial obligations of our joint venture agreements, especially if the cost estimates for our projects change due to their long-term nature .

The Company will need to incur additional capital expenditures to meet the financial obligations under or joint venture agreements and if the cost estimates for our projects change due to their long-term nature. These capital expenditures are intended to be funded from third party sources, including the incurring of debt and/or the sale of additional equity securities. In addition to requiring additional financing to fund capital expenditures, the Company may require additional financing to fund working capital, research and development, sales and marketing, general and administrative expenditures and operating losses. The incurrence of debt creates additional financial leverage and therefore an increase in the financial risk of the Companys operations. The sale of additional equity securities will be dilutive to the interests of current equity holders. In addition, there can be no assurance that such additional financing, whether debt or equity, will be available to the Company or that it will be available on acceptable commercial terms. Any inability to secure such additional financing on appropriate terms could have a materially adverse impact on the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company. 

No assurance of commercial feasibility.


Even if the Companys plans and projects are successfully initiated, there can be no assurance that such plans and projects will have any commercial success or advantage. Also, there is no assurance that the Companys initiatives will perform as intended in the marketplace.


The Company has limited operating history of its own and as such any prospective investor cannot assess the Companys profitability or performance.


Because the Company has limited operating history, it is impossible for an investor to assess the performance of the Company or to determine whether the Company will meet its projected business plan. The Company has limited financial results upon which an investor may judge its potential. The Company may experience under-capitalization, shortages, setbacks and many of the problems, delays and expenses encountered by any early stage business. An investor will be required to make an investment decision based solely on the Company managements history and its projected operations in light of the risks, expenses and uncertainties that may be encountered by engaging in the Companys industry.


The Company has no revenues to date.


The Company has generated no revenue to date . and has no source of on-going revenue.revenue . Most of the time of the Companys management, and most of the Companys limited resources have been spent in developing its initial plans, researching additional projects, contacting potential partners, exploring marketing contacts, establishing manufacturing sources, preparing our business plan and model, selecting professional advisors and consultants and seeking capital for the Company.


The Companys founder beneficially owns and will continue to own a majority of the Companys common stock and, as a result, can exercise control over shareholder and corporate actions.


Mr. Shah Mathias, the founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company,founder of the Company , is currently the beneficial owner of approximately 93.97% of the Companys outstanding common stock, and assuming sale of all the 1,000,000 Shares, will own approximately 93.88% of the Company's then outstanding common stock upon closing of the offering. As such, he will be able to exert significant influence and potential control over matters requiring approval by shareholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the market price of the Companys common stock or prevent shareholders from realizing a premium over the market price for their Shares.  


15Mr. Mathias has various judgments against him in regards to his prior business dealings, which could adversely affect the ability of the Company to obtain the required land, enter into joint ventures, or obtain the required financing.


Because, Shah Mathias has various previous judgments against him, third parties may be reluctant to enter into joint ventures with the Company if he is involved. Additional, Mr. Mathias history may compromise the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary government permits or to obtain financing under favorable terms.


Mr. Mathias has a controlling interest in many of the entities that the Company plans to and is doing business with.


Because Mr. Mathias has a controlling interest in entities that the Company is contacting with, the Company may not be able to take action against these entities for failure to perform, which could cause delays or total shutdowns of the Company projects


The Company may have conflicts of interest and have engaged in transactions with its officers and directors and have entered into agreements or arrangements that were not negotiated at arms length.


The Company has engaged, and may in the future engage, in transactions with its officers, directors and principal shareholders, or persons or entities affiliated with any of these persons. These transactions may not have been on terms as favorable to the Company as could have been obtained from non-affiliated persons. While an effort has been made and will continue to be made to obtain services from affiliated persons at rates as favorable as would be charged by others, there will always be an inherent conflict of interest between the interests of our Company and those of the officers, directors, principal shareholders, and affiliates. Shah Mathias has an ownership interest in many of the companies with which the Company is proposing to utilize for certain of the development and management functions of the transportation systems. Mr. Mathias may economically benefit from the use of these companies.


Reliance on third party agreements and relationships is necessary for development of the Company's business.


The Company will rely heavily on third parties to help plan, secure and execute transportation projects. Unless the Company can develop its own brand equity and consumer awareness, the Company will be substantially dependent on these third parties.


Municipalities, government agencies and other non-profit boards or groups may be unable to develop bond offerings that are sufficient to fund the transportation projects plans or other projects presented by the Company to such municipalities, agencies or groups.


When the Company presents its plans or projects to the respective regional government agency or agencies, or non-profit board or group, whether state(s), local or regional, there is no assurance that such agency will adopt the plan or if adopted whether it will be able to have effected a bond issuance sufficient to raise funds to implement the project plan


The development of high speed rail and other innovative transportation projects is uncertain and the profitability of such projects remains unclear.


The Company believes that it is a relative pioneer in developing the next generation of rail transportation and innovative transportation in the United States, e.g. high speed rail. As such, there are few, if any, examples of developed high-speed rail or other projects that can be used either as developmental models or commercial viability models. For example, although high-speed rail projects may be successful in other countries, there is no assurance that such method of transportation will be successful in the United States which historically maintains an automobile-centered transportation system.


Government regulation could negatively impact the business.


The Companys projects may be subject to government regulation in the jurisdictions in which they operate. Due to the potential wide geographic scope of the Companys operations, the Company could be subject to regulation by political and regulatory entities throughout the world. The Company may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply. The Companys sales could be adversely affected, directly or indirectly, by existing or future laws and regulations relating to its products or industry.


For example, as rail tracks will cross many differing municipal and state jurisdictions, the Company will be faced with myriad regulations from these jurisdictions as well as the federal government. The Company will need to comply with all government regulations which the Company expects will relate to items such as local zoning codes, noise regulations, track and crossing construction, maintenance and safety, environmental impact on construction and usage, rights-of-way and other matters. A failure to know the applicable regulations or to successfully abide by such regulations, could negatively impact the Company with potential fines, stoppages or other remedies.


As the Company is introducing a novel concept and innovative plan to the marketplace, the Company is unaware of any specific government regulation that could negatively affect its business. However, because this industry niche is new and



16



because there is a component of risk of loss to persons and property, the Company believes that there may ultimately be regulation affecting its projects on both a state and federal level. It is impossible to predict what such regulation would encompass, but any regulation would most likely be at least include additional reporting requirements, potential project specifications or requirements and possibly even regulation of additional aspects of the industry.


There has been no active public market for the Companys securities and the lack of such a market may make resale of the stock difficult.


No active public market has existed for the Companys securities and the Company cannot assure any investor that a market will develop subsequent to this offering. An investor must be fully aware of the long-term nature of an investment in the Company. The Company intends to apply for quotation listing of its common stock on NASDAQ as soon as possible which may be while this offering is still in process.process . However, the Company does not know if it will be successful in such application, how long such application will take, or, that if successful, that a market for the common stock will ever develop or continue on NASDAQ. If for any reason the common stock is not listed on the NASDAQ or a public trading market does not otherwise develop, investors in the offering may have difficulty selling their common stock should they desire to do so.


The Company does not intend to pay dividends to its stockholders, so investors will not receive any return on investment in the Company prior to selling their interest in it.


The Company does not project paying dividends but anticipates that it will retain future earnings for funding the Companys growth and development. Therefore, investors should not expect the Company to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, investors will not receive any return on their investment prior to selling their Shares in the Company, if and when a market for such Shares develops. Furthermore, even if a market for the Companys securities does develop, there is no guarantee that the market price for the shares would be equal to or more than the initial per share investment price paid by any investor. There is a possibility that the Shares could lose all or a significant portion of their value from the initial price paid in this offering.


The Companys stock may be considered a penny stock and any investment in the Companys stock will be considered a high-risk investment and subject to restrictions on marketability.


If the Shares commence trading, the trading price of the Company's common stock may be below $5.00 per Share. If the price of the common stock is below such level, trading in its common stock would be subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These rules require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trades generally involving any non-NASDAQ equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per Share, subject to certain exceptions. Such rules require the delivery, before any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith, and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions). For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must determine the suitability of the penny stock for the purchaser and receive the purchasers written consent to the transactions before sale. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in the Companys common stock which could impact the liquidity of the Companys common stock.


The Company has authorized the issuance of preferred stock with certain preferences.

 

The board of directors of the Company is authorized to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of $0.000001 par value preferred stock. The board of directors has the power to establish the dividend rates, liquidation preferences, and voting rights of any series of preferred stock, and these rights may be superior to the rights of holders of the Shares. The board of directors may also establish redemption and conversion terms and privileges with respect to any shares of preferred stock. Any such preferences may operate to the detriment of the rights of the holders of the Shares, and further, could be used by the board of directors as a device to prevent a change in control of the Company. To date 1,800,000 shares of preferred stock have been issued.




17



It is difficult to predict the Companys financial performance, which may fluctuate widely.


The Company has not yet generated revenues and may never do so. If the Company does generate revenues, its quarterly results of operations are likely to vary significantly. A number of factors are likely to cause these variations, some of which are outside of the Companys control. Some of these factors include (without limitation):


  The acceptance by the transportation and infrastructure industry of the solutions that the Company offers;

The amount and timing of capital expenditures and other costs relating to the expansion of the Company;

The introduction of competing projects and solutions;

Price competition or changes in the industry; and

Technical difficulties or economic conditions specific to the Company or its business.


Our Executive Officers and Directors have limited Prior Experience Managing a Public Company


Some of our officers and directors have limited experience conducting managing a public company. Consequently, we may not be able to raise any funds or run our public company successfully. If we are not able to raise sufficient funds, we may not be able to fund our operations as planned, and our business will suffer and your investment may be materially adversely affected.


Inability to Attract and Retain Qualified Personnel

  

ARMT management team currently consists of seven members. Our future success depends in significant part on our ability to attract and retain key management and marketing personnel. Competition for highly qualified professional, business development, and management and marketing personnel is intense. We may experience difficulty in attracting new personnel, may not be able to hire the necessary personnel to implement our business strategy, or we may need to pay higher compensation for employees than we may expect. A shortage in the availability of qualified personnel could limit our ability to grow. We cannot assure you that we will succeed in attracting and retaining the personnel we need to grow.


Indemnification Requirements


ARMT may be required to indemnify, among others, the officers and directors for liabilities incurred in connection with the affairs of ARMT. Such liabilities may be material. The indemnification obligations of ARMT would be payable from the assets of ARMT, thus causing a material adverse effect on the Companys operations.


Requirements to Maintain Proper and Effective Internal Controls


ARMT must ensure that adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures are in place so that it can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis. ARMT must spend considerable effort on establishing and maintaining internal controls, which is costly and time-consuming and needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Implementing any appropriate changes to the internal controls may entail substantial costs to modify ARMTs existing financial and accounting systems, take a significant period of time to complete, and distract ARMTs officers and directors from the operation of our business. These changes may not, however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of ARMTs internal controls, and any failure to maintain that adequacy, or a consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase operating costs and could materially impair ARMTs ability to operate our business. In addition, investors perceptions that ARMTs internal controls are inadequate or that it is unable to produce accurate financial statements may seriously affect the stock price.


Changes in Financial Accounting Standards or Practices


A change in accounting standards or practices can have a significant effect on ARMTs operating results and may affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying



18



interpretations of existing accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect ARMTs reported financial results or the way we conducts our business.


Significant Costs of Operating as a Public Company


As a public company, ARMT incurs significant accounting and other expenses. These expenses include increased accounting, legal and other professional fees, insurance premiums and investor relations costs. ARMTs management needs to devote a substantial amount of time to compliance issues. Moreover, ARMTs legal and financial compliance costs are material.


The Costs and Expenses of SEC Reporting and Compliance


We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. The costs of complying with such requirements may be substantial. We anticipate that such costs will be significant each year. In the event we are unable to establish a base of operations that generates sufficient cash flows or cannot obtain additional equity or debt financing, the costs of maintaining our status as a reporting entity may inhibit out ability to continue our operations.


Limited Protection against Interested Director Transactions, Conflicts of Interest and Similar Matters


While the Board of Directors has established an audit committee, we have also form a nominating committee and compensation committee. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest, if any, and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations.


We intend to comply with all corporate governance measures relating to director independence as and when required. However, we may find it very difficult or be unable to attract and retain qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in a series of rules and regulations by the SEC that increase responsibilities and liabilities of directors and executive officers. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may make it more costly or deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles.


The following is the applicable provision of our by-laws:

·            Deter litigation by investors reducing unnecessary costs of litigation

·A plaintiff must plead non-exculpated claims against each particular director for a complaint to survive dismissal with respect to that director, regardless of the standard of review applicable to the transaction - The Supreme Court held that even if plaintiffs can plead facts supporting the application of the entire fairness standard to the transaction, and thus the allegedly interested fiduciaries were automatically subject to a duty of loyalty claim, it does not follow that all of the independent directors are also subject to such a claim.  As to the independent directors who enjoy the benefit of an exculpatory provision, plaintiffs must plead facts indicating that the director breached the duty of loyalty ( i.e. , he or she was interested in the transaction or otherwise acted in bad faith) in order for the claim against such director to survive dismissal.

·Independent directors are entitled to the protection of the business judgment rule in controlling stockholder transactions unless the plaintiff pleads facts that the presumption should not apply - The Supreme Court stated that holding otherwise would "create more harm than benefit for minority stockholders" because independent directors would then be incentivized to avoid serving on special committees or to reject transactions "solely because their role in negotiating on behalf of the stockholders would cause them to remain as defendants until the end of any litigation challenging the transaction."      

This opinion emphasizes that independent directors who fulfill their fiduciary duty of care should be free to approve a transaction that is in the best interests of the stockholders, even when such transaction involves a controlling stockholder.

The Company may have to expend assets and time in defending this adopted by-law when and if future claims occur.

Possible Regulatory Changes


The SEC and other regulators, from time to time, review the public company arena and our relationship to the securities markets and investors. As a result of such reviews, the SEC and such regulators may propose additional regulations that would affect ARMT. Such regulations could increase the cost of operating ARMT and subject it to new regulatory filing or registration requirements.


Risks of Purchasing Shares


Possible Loss of Entire Investment in the Company


This offering is intended for investors who can accept the applicable risks. Prospective investors should not subscribe unless they can readily bear the consequences of the loss of their entire investment. Being that the Companys management has limited experience in this industry, such loss of investment may be more likely to occur.


Because you are Purchasing Class B shares of Common Stock of the Company, you May be in a Disadvantaged Position, as Compared to Holders of Class C and Class D Common Stock of the Company.


Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares (EPDS) with no voting rights but with dividend rights. hasdividendrights . The Company may issue these shares as it deems necessary, for the purposes including but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations. While Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares (EPS), with no voting rights and no dividend rights do not havedividend rights , they are used by the Company for special purposes and may have payment priorities. The Company may issue these shares as its currency as it deems necessary, for the following purposes but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.


Therefore, both the Class C and Class D shareholders may receive senior dividends or returns prior to the holders of Class B common stock, thereby decreasing the value of the Class B common stock.


Because you are Purchasing Class B shares of Common Stock of the Company, you May be in a Disadvantaged Position, as Compared to Holders of Class A Common Stock of the Company.


Therefore, class B com mon stock has voting rights of one vote to one share compared to Class A common stock has one thousand votes to one share. Holding Class B shares will never give y ou controlling voting power of the Company and you may be at risk .


Because we do not have an Escrow or Trust Account for Your Subscription, if we File for Bankruptcy Protection or are Forced into Bankruptcy, or a Creditor Obtains a Judgment against us and Attaches the Proceeds.


Your funds will not be placed in an escrow or trust account. All subscriptions in this offering will be available for our immediate use, and will not be returning subscriptions regardless of how many shares are sold in this offering.



19



Accordingly, if we file for bankruptcy protection or a petition for involuntary bankruptcy is filed by creditors against us, your funds will become part of the bankruptcy estate and administered according to the bankruptcy laws. If a creditor sues us and obtains a judgment against us, the creditor could garnish the bank account and take possession of the subscriptions. As such, it is possible that a creditor could attach your subscription which could preclude or delay the return of money to you.


Exchange Fluctuations May Decrease the Value of your Investment


Shares will be priced in US dollars, and persons investing by converting foreign currency will bear the risk of such conversion. The Company understands that foreign investors may be attracted to investments in infrastructure, therefore be more likely to invest in securities, such as the Companys common stock. The value of such investments may be affected favorably or unfavorably by fluctuations in exchange currencies. In addition, prospective investors whose assets and liabilities are primarily denominated in currencies other than US Dollars should take into account the potential risk of loss arising from fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the currency of the investment and such other currency.


Additional Dilution as Additional Shares are Issued

 

Additional offerings will likely have to be made in the future to raise capital to meet operating cash flow needs. Such offerings may include warrants for issuance of additional common stock, further diluting the number of shares of common stock outstanding from time to time. An increase in the number of our shares of common stock from these events or others may result in a decrease of the market price for our common stock and will dilute the ownership interest of current shareholders.  


Future Debt Financing May Involve Restrictive Covenants


Future debt financing transactions, if available, may involve restrictive covenants, which may limit the Companys operating flexibility with respect to certain business matters. If additional funds are raised through debt financing, the debt holders may require the Company to make certain agreements or covenants, which could limit or prohibit the Company from taking specific actions, such as establishing a limit on further debt, a limit on dividends, a limit on sale of assets, or specific collateral requirements. Furthermore, if the Company raises funds though debt financing, the Company would also become subject to interest and principal payment obligations. In either case, if the Company was unable to fulfill either of the covenants or the financial obligations, the Company may risk defaulting on the loan, whereby ownership of the Companys assets could be transferred from the shareholders to the debt holders.


Shares Eligible for Future Sale under Rule 144 May Adversely Affect the Market Value for our Securities

 

From time to time, certain of our stockholders who hold restricted securities may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of common stock by means of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144, promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, subject to certain limitations. Although our current stockholder has no current intention or ability to sell his shares, any substantial sales by holders of our common stock in the future pursuant to Rule 144 may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities.


If Securities or Industry Analysts do not publish Research or Reports about ARMTs Business or if they issue an Adverse or Misleading Opinion Regarding ARMT Stock, its Price and Trading Volume Could Decline


The trading market for ARMTs common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about ARMT or its business, if any. Negative reports could have a negative impact on ARMTs stock price.


If we fail to Remain Current on our Reporting Requirements, we could be removed from Listing on the NASDAQ and/or Quotation by the OTCQB or the OTCPink


Companies listed on NASDAQ or quoted on the OTCQB or OTCPink must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the



20



Exchange Act, and must be current in their reports under Section 13 of the Exchange Act, in order to maintain price listing privileges on NASDAQ or quotation on the OTCQB or OTCPink. Assuming we are ever quoted on NASDAQ or the OTCQB, if we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from NASDAQ or the OTCQB, as applicable. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.


Changes in Tax Rules or Interpretations couldc C ould Cause a Shareholder to become subject to Additional Taxes


Federal income tax legislation may be amended, or its interpretation changed, so as to alter fundamentally the tax consequences of holding or disposing of shares of common stock. The investor should consult his, her or its own tax counsel for tax matters via this investment opportunity.


There is No Minimum Purchase Amount


The Offering described herein has no minimum purchase amount required in order to consummate the Offering. Therefore, the costs of the Offering may greatly outweigh the fiscal benefit to ARMT of undertaking the Offering. This could cause ARMT to lose money by doing the Offering and cause an investor to lose his or her entire investment.



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This prospectus includes forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements.  The words "believe," "may," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "should," "plan," "expect" and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

Other sections of this prospectus may include additional factors which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a highly regulated, very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

 

We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events or performance. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We have an ongoing obligation to continually disclose material future changes in the Company and its operations.


USE OF PROCEEDS

 

We hope to raise a maximum of $60,000,000 in this offering. We are requiring no minimum offering proceeds threshold. The table below summarizes how we will utilize the proceeds of this offering, including in the event that the Company raises less than the full amount expected ($60,000,000). The actual amount of proceeds realized may differ from the amounts summarized below (1). In order to successfully carry out our stated goals, ARMT would need $60,000,000, including capital raised in this offering. In the event we engage an underwriter, we anticipate incurring up to $4,200,000.00 for underwriters commission. In addition, we expect to incur approximately $67,154 in other direct offering expenses, $100,000.00 in SEC reporting and compliance, $3,000,000.00 in operating and equipment, and $15,000,000.00 to maintain our general and administrative functions over the next twelve months. We are also hoping to accrue $19,050,000.00 in working capital. However, if we dont raise sufficient proceeds in this offering or generate



21



sufficient revenue, our working capital goal may not be met. Furthermore, without sufficient proceeds from this offering or the generation of sufficient revenue, some of our other expenses, including advertising and marketing, website design, and operating and equipment may not be incurred or undertaken.


If 10 %

If 25 %

If 50 %

If 75 %

If 100 %


6,000,000

15,000,000

30,000,000

45,000,000

60,000,000







Administrative

1,500,000

3,750,000

7,500,000

11,250,000

15,000,000

Marketing

420,000

1,050,000

2,100,000

3,150,000

4,200,000

Legal

100,000

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

Accounting

100,000

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

Title Insurance

25,000

62,500

125,000

187,500

250,000

Insurance

50,000

125,000

250,000

375,000

500,000

Land Purchase

800,000

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

Land Improvements

400,000

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

Corp. Headquarters

100,000

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

Executed Agreements

500,000

1,250,000

2,500,000

3,750,000

5,000,000

Operating Capital Reserve

1,905,000

4,762,500

9,525,000

14,287,500

19,050,000

Equipment Purchase

100,000

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000


6,000,000

15,000,000

30,000,000

45,000,000

60,000,000




If 10 %

If 25 %

If 50 %

If 75 %

If 100 %


6,000,000

15,000,000

30,000,000

45,000,000

60,000,000







Administrative

1,500,000

3,750,000

7,500,000

11,250,000

15,000,000

Marketing

420,000

1,050,000

2,100,000

3,150,000

4,200,000

Legal

100,000

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

Accounting

100,000

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

Title Insurance

25,000

62,500

125,000

187,500

250,000

Insurance

50,000

125,000

250,000

375,000

500,000

Land Purchase

800,000

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

Land Improvements

400,000

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

Corp. Headquarters

100,000

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

Executed Agreements

500,000

1,250,000

2,500,000

3,750,000

5,000,000

Operating Capital Reserve

1,905,000

4,762,500

9,525,000

14,287,500

19,050,000

Equipment Purchase

100,000

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000


6,000,000

15,000,000

30,000,000

45,000,000

60,000,000



(1) The amounts set forth above are estimates by management for the allocations of the net proceeds of this offering based upon the current state of our business operations, our business plan and current economic and industry conditions.


(2) If sufficient funds are not raised in this offering, or through revenues of the Company, these items may not be undertaken.


(3) If less than 7% of the Shares are sold the cost of the offering, in the event we engage an underwriter, as to be paid from proceeds of the offering, will exceed the net proceeds and result in a decrease in our working capital.


(4) If less than .01% of the Shares are sold the cost of the offering, in the event of a direct offering, as to be paid from proceeds of the offering, will exceed the net proceeds and result in a decrease in our working capital.


(5) Equipment purchases will be from Caterpillar, John Deere and Volvo.

22



Company Projections 







                       Forecasted Income Statement





AMERI METRO INC.













INCOME APPROACH


Allocated Entity


7-Year 41.5%









April 6 2016


Bond offering

FN

Total Income (3)



Total Income by year for 7 years (1)





Four Non-Profits to officiate bond offerings

Exhibit

Per Projects

 

Off Bond Offering

2016-2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Total

 













 





4%

16.00%

16.00%

16.00%

16.00%

16.00%

16.00%

100%

HSR Facility Provider Inc.  (High Speed Rail)

10.24

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

HSR Facility Inc.      (Al. Pa. Port Operations)

10.22

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

ATFI                    (Alabama Toll Rd)

10.19

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

Global Infrastructure Development & Fin. Authority













 For Parallel Ancillary Infrastructure


























Parallel Ancillary Infrastructure Development Bonds













Appalachian Regional Commissions Documents

10.17

34,000,000,000

2

14,110,000,000

564,400,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

14,110,000,000

ATFI 2016 Documents

10.19

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

Atlantic Energy and Utilities Documents

10.21

40,000,000,000

2

16,600,000,000

664,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

16,600,000,000

High Speed Rail Facilities Inc. Master Trust Indenture Documents

10.22

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc. Master Trust Indenture Documents

10.24

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

HSR Freight and Passenger for Port Freeport Brazoria Texas Documents

10.23

4,000,000,000

2

1,660,000,000

66,400,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

1,660,000,000

HSR Freight Line Inc Phil. Regional Port Authority Documents

10.28

4,000,000,000

2

1,660,000,000

66,400,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

1,660,000,000

HSR Freight Line Inc. Documents

10.29

60,000,000,000

2

24,900,000,000

996,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

24,900,000,000

HSR Passenger Services and HSR Freight line Inc. Ga Resolution 948 Documents

10.14

10,000,000,000

2

4,150,000,000

166,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

4,150,000,000

HSR Passenger Services Inc. Documents

10.3

25,000,000,000

2

10,375,000,000

415,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

10,375,000,000

HSR Technologies Inc. Documents

10.31

25,000,000,000

2

10,375,000,000

415,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

10,375,000,000

KS JM International Airport Documents

10.27

15,000,000,000

2

6,225,000,000

249,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

6,225,000,000

Lord Chauffeurs LTD Documents

10.35

2,000,000,000

2

830,000,000

33,200,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

830,000,000

Malibu Homes Inc. Documents

10.32

60,000,000,000

2

24,900,000,000

996,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

24,900,000,000

Michigan COAST -to-COAST Passenger Rail Documents

10.36

4,000,000,000

2

1,660,000,000

66,400,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

1,660,000,000

New York Washington HS Rail Corridor  Documents

10.37

38,000,000,000

2

15,770,000,000

630,800,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

15,770,000,000

Platinum Media Inc. Documents

10.33

4,000,000,000

2

1,660,000,000

66,400,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

1,660,000,000

Port of De Claudius Inc. Documents

10.34

8,000,000,000

2

3,320,000,000

132,800,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

3,320,000,000

Port of Ostia Inc. Ann Charles international Cargo Airport Brazoria TX Indentures Documents

10.38

8,000,000,000

2

3,320,000,000

132,800,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

3,320,000,000

Port Ostia Air Cargo Documents

10.25

5,000,000,000

2

2,075,000,000

83,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

2,075,000,000

Portus De Jewel Mexico Documents

10.26

40,000,000,000

2

16,600,000,000

664,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

16,600,000,000

Total Revenue





8,399,600,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

209,990,000,000

Total Bond Indenture  Raise by Year


506,000,000,000


209,990,000,000

20,240,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

506,000,000,000

Expenses as a percentage of revenues:













    Operating              20%





1,679,920,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

41,998,000,000

    Salaries                  30%





2,519,880,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

62,997,000,000

    Gen and Admin    16%





1,343,936,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

33,598,400,000

Total Expenses         66%





5,543,736,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

138,593,400,000














Income from Operations Before Provision for Taxes













Total Net Income Before Taxes





2,855,864,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

71,396,600,000














Provision for Taxes





999,052,624

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

24,976,315,595






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)   (1)





1,856,811,376

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

46,420,284,405







                       Forecasted Income Statement





AMERI METRO INC.













INCOME APPROACH


Allocated Entity


7-Year 41.5%









April 6 2016


Bond offering

FN

Total Income (3)



Total Income by year for 7 years (1)





Four Non-Profits to officiate bond offerings

Exhibit

Per Projects

Off Bond Offering

2016-2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Total

















4%

16.00%

16.00%

16.00%

16.00%

16.00%

16.00%

100%

HSR Facility Provider Inc.  (High Speed Rail)

10.24

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

HSR Facility Inc.      (Al. Pa. Port Operations)

10.22

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

ATFI       (Alabama Toll Rd)

10.19

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

Global Infrastructure Development & Fin. Authority













 For Parallel Ancillary Infrastructure


























Parallel Ancillary Infrastructure Development Bonds













Appalachian Regional Commissions Documents

10.17

34,000,000,000

2

14,110,000,000

564,400,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

2,257,600,000

14,110,000,000

ATFI 2016 Documents

10.19

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

Atlantic Energy and Utilities Documents

10.21

40,000,000,000

2

16,600,000,000

664,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

16,600,000,000

High Speed Rail Facilities Inc. Master Trust Indenture Documents

10.22

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc. Master Trust Indenture Documents

10.24

20,000,000,000

2

8,300,000,000

332,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

1,328,000,000

8,300,000,000

HSR Freight and Passenger for Port Freeport Brazoria Texas Documents

10.23

4,000,000,000

2

1,660,000,000

66,400,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

1,660,000,000

HSR Freight Line Inc Phil. Regional Port Authority Documents

10.28

4,000,000,000

2

1,660,000,000

66,400,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

1,660,000,000

HSR Freight Line Inc. Documents

10.29

60,000,000,000

2

24,900,000,000

996,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

24,900,000,000

HSR Passenger Services and HSR Freight line Inc. Ga Resolution 948 Documents

10.14

10,000,000,000

2

4,150,000,000

166,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

664,000,000

4,150,000,000

HSR Passenger Services Inc. Documents

10.3

25,000,000,000

2

10,375,000,000

415,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

10,375,000,000

HSR Technologies Inc. Documents

10.31

25,000,000,000

2

10,375,000,000

415,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

1,660,000,000

10,375,000,000

KS JM International Airport Documents

10.27

15,000,000,000

2

6,225,000,000

249,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

996,000,000

6,225,000,000

Lord Chauffeurs LTD Documents

10.35

2,000,000,000

2

830,000,000

33,200,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

132,800,000

830,000,000

Malibu Homes Inc. Documents

10.32

60,000,000,000

2

24,900,000,000

996,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

3,984,000,000

24,900,000,000

Michigan COAST -to-COAST Passenger Rail Documents

10.36

4,000,000,000

2

1,660,000,000

66,400,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

1,660,000,000

New York Washington HS Rail Corridor  Documents

10.37

38,000,000,000

2

15,770,000,000

630,800,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

2,523,200,000

15,770,000,000

Platinum Media Inc. Documents

10.33

4,000,000,000

2

1,660,000,000

66,400,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

265,600,000

1,660,000,000

Port of De Claudius Inc. Documents

10.34

8,000,000,000

2

3,320,000,000

132,800,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

3,320,000,000

Port of Ostia Inc. Ann Charles international Cargo Airport Brazoria TX Indentures Documents

10.38

8,000,000,000

2

3,320,000,000

132,800,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

531,200,000

3,320,000,000

Port Ostia Air Cargo Documents

10.25

5,000,000,000

2

2,075,000,000

83,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

332,000,000

2,075,000,000

Portus De Jewel Mexico Documents

10.26

40,000,000,000

2

16,600,000,000

664,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

2,656,000,000

16,600,000,000

Total Revenue





8,399,600,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

33,598,400,000

209,990,000,000

Total Bond Indenture  Raise by Year


506,000,000,000


209,990,000,000

20,240,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

80,960,000,000

506,000,000,000

Expenses as a percentage of revenues:













    Operating          ��   20%





1,679,920,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

6,719,680,000

41,998,000,000

    Salaries                  30%





2,519,880,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

10,079,520,000

62,997,000,000

    Gen and Admin    16%





1,343,936,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

5,375,744,000

33,598,400,000

Total Expenses         66%





5,543,736,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

22,174,944,000

138,593,400,000














Income from Operations Before Provision for Taxes













Total Net Income Before Taxes





2,855,864,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

11,423,456,000

71,396,600,000














Provision for Taxes





999,052,624

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

3,996,210,495

24,976,315,595






Net Income (Loss)   (1)





1,856,811,376

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

7,427,245,505

46,420,284,405



(1)

(1)   Net income is considered bookable revenue from bond consulting fees, cash flow from bookable revenue will vary year to year and be realized in full over and beyond the 7 year projected revenue time frame.

(2)

The Company will utilize seasoned regional sub-contractors in each project market to perform work shortly after bond offering.  Each party will manage its own project independent of each other. Initial major investments in land investments, environmental studies, engineering, site improvements and land improvements will occur. Subsequent bond offerings will be issued for additional phases of the projects from Master Bond Indentures, but not limited to Parallel Ancillary Infrastructure Development. Costs are based on US Government Standards, by partnering with related parties, efficiencies will be realized translating into profits.    

(3)

41.5% breakdown is as follows: 1.5% Consulting Fee, Cost of project plus 40%

 

23



DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

 

Our initial offering price of $60.00 per share was determined based upon a valuation report from Pro Advisor, dated November 1, 2016 which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1



DILUTION OF THE PRICE YOU PAY FOR YOUR SHARES

We are offering our common stock at a price per share that is significantly more than the price per share paid by our current stockholder for our common stock. We are offering for sale up to 1,000,000 Shares of Class B common stock with proceeds going to the Company. If you purchase Shares in this offering you will experience immediate and substantial dilution.

 

Dilution represents the difference between the price per share paid by purchasers in this offering and the net tangible book value per share. Net tangible book value per share represents our net tangible assets (our total tangible assets, $41,023, less our total liabilities, ($16,355,273), divided by the number of Shares of Common Stock outstanding at the time of the offering. Based upon 1,044,134,483 issued and outstanding Shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock on July 31, 2016, our net tangible book value per share was ($0.015625) per share.


The following table illustrates the pro forma per share dilution:



July 31, 2016

Offering Sale

Stock Class

Issued and Outstanding

100%

75%

50%

25%

10%

Common A

1,600,000

1,600,000

1,600,000

1,600,000

1,600,000

1,600,000

Common B

987,934,483

987,934,483

987,934,483

987,934,483

987,934,483

987,934,483

Common C

4,800,000

4,800,000

4,800,000

4,800,000

4,800,000

4,800,000

Common D

48,000,000

48,000,000

48,000,000

48,000,000

48,000,000

48,000,000

Preferred

1,800,000

1,800,000

1,800,000

1,800,000

1,800,000

1,800,000

Total Shares

1,044,134,483

1,044,134,483

1,044,134,483

1,044,134,483

1,044,134,483

1,044,134,483

Stock sold through Offering

0

1,000,000

750,000

500,000

250,000

100,000

Total Shares after Offering

1,044,134,483

1,045,134,483

1,044,884,483

1,044,634,483

1,044,384,483

1,044,234,483















Total Assets - July 31, 2016

$41,023

$41,023

$41,023

$41,023

$41,023

$41,023

Proceeds from Offering @ Net $55.80 per share

$0

$55,800,000

$41,850,000

$27,900,000

$13,950,000

$5,580,000

Total Liabilities - July 31, 2016

-$16,355,273

-$16,355,273

-$16,355,273

-$16,355,273

-$16,355,273

-$16,355,273

Net Tangible Assets

-$16,314,250

$39,485,750

$25,535,750

$11,585,750

-$2,364,250

-$10,734,250








Net Tangible book value per share after offering

-$0.015625

$0.037817

$0.024456

$0.011096

-$0.002264

-$0.010281








Net Dilution Per Share to New Investors

$59.9622

$59.9755

$59.9889

$60.0023

$60.0103



After giving effect to the sale of the maximum of 1,000,000 Shares being offered in this offering, at $60.00 per Share, and the payment of expenses related to the offering, net $55.80 per share, our pro forma net tangible book value would increase by $55,800,000 to $39,485,750 or $0.037817 per share.

24

share


The following table illustrates the pro forma per share dilution described above assuming 1,000,000 Shares are sold:




1,000,000

 



1,000,000

Shares Sold

Shares Sold

 





 

Offering Price per share

$

60.00

 

$

60.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net tangible book value per share before the offering

 

$

-0.015625

 

$

-0.015625

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the offering

 

$

0.037817

 

$

0.037817

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dilution per share to new investors

 

$

59.9622

 

$

59.9622



After giving effect to the sale of 75% of the Shares (750,000 Shares) being offered in this offering, at $60.00 per Share, and the payment of expenses related to the offering, net $55.80 per share, our pro forma net tangible book value would increase by $41,850,000 to $25,535,750 or $0.024456 per share.


The following table illustrates the pro forma per share dilution described above assuming 750,000 shares are sold:


750,000

 


 

750,000

Shares Sold

Shares Sold

 





Offering Price per share

$

60.00

 

$

60.00

 

 

 

 


 

 


 

 

Net tangible book value per share before the offering

 

$

-0.015625

 

$

-0.015625

 

 

 

 


 

 


 

 

Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the offering

 

$

0.024456

 

$

0.024456

 

 

 

 


 

 


 

 

Dilution per share to new investors

 

$

59.9755

 

$

59.9755

 

 



After giving effect to the sale of 50% of the Shares (500,000 Shares) being offered in this offering, at $60.00 per Share, and the payment of expenses related to the offering, net $55.80 per share, our pro forma net tangible book value would increase by $27,900,000 to $11,585,750 or $0.011096 per share.


The following table illustrates the pro forma per share dilution described above assuming 500,000 shares are sold:


500,000





500,000

Shares Sold

Shares Sold





Offering Price per share

$

60.00

 

$

60.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net tangible book value per share before the offering

$

-0.015625

 

$

-0.015625

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the offering

$

0.011096

 

$

0.011096

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dilution per share to new investors

$

59.9889

 

$

59.9889



After giving effect to the sale of 25% of the Shares 250,000 Shares) being offered in this offering, at $60.00 per Share, and the payment of expenses related to the offering, net $55.80 per share, our pro forma net tangible book value would increase by $13,950,000 to -$2,364,250 or -$0.002264 per share.

 

25


The following table illustrates the pro forma per share dilution described above assuming 250,000 shares are sold:



 


250,000 Shares Sold





Offering Price per share  

$

60.00


 

 

 

Net tangible book value per share before the offering  

 

$

-0.015625

   

 

 

 

Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the offering  

 

$

-0.002264


 

 

 

Dilution per share to new investors  

 

$

60.0023 

   

250,000

 

   

Shares Sold

 

   

Offering Price per share  

 

$

60.00

 


 

 

 

 

Net tangible book value per share before the offering  

 

$

-0.015625

 

   

 

 

 

 

Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the offering  

 

$

0.002264

 


 

 

 

 

Dilution per share to new investors  

 

$

60.0023 

 



After giving effect to the sale of 10% of the Shares (100,000 Shares) being offered in this offering, at $60.00 per Share, and the payment of expenses related to the offering, net $55.80 per share, our pro forma net tangible book value would increase by $5,580,000 to -$10,734,250 or -$0.010281per share.


The following table illustrates the pro forma per share dilution described above assuming 100,000 shares are sold:





100,000 Shares Sold





Offering Price per share  

$

60.00

   

 

 

 

Net tangible book value per share before the offering  

 

$

-0.015625

   

 

 


Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the offering  

 

$

-0.010281

   

 

 


Dilution per share to new investors  

 

$

60.0103 

   

100,000

   

Shares Sold

   

Offering Price per share  

 

$

60.00

 

   

 

 

 

 

Net tangible book value per share before the offering  

 

$

-0.015625

 

   

 

 


 

Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the offering  

 

$

0.010281

 

   

 

 


 

Dilution per share to new investors  

 

$

60.0103 

 



The table below indicates the relative aggregate cash investment and stock ownership of new investors in this offering:

 


Maximum Offering of:






1,000,000 Shares


Investment


Stock Ownership


 %

Current Stockholders




1,044,134,483


99.9043%

New Investors

$

60,000,000


1,000,000

 

0.0957%

Total Shares after offering




1,045,134,483


100.0000%








75% Offering of 1,000,000 Shares







Current Stockholders

 



1,044,134,483


99.9282%

New Investors

$

45,000,000


750,000

 

0.0718%

Total Shares after offering




1,044,884,483


100.0000%








50% Offering of 1,000,000 Shares







Current Stockholders

 



1,044,134,483


99.9521%

New Investors

$

30,000,000


500,000

 

0.0479%

Total Shares after offering




1,044,634,483


100.0000%








25% Offering of 1,000,000 Shares







Current Stockholders

 



1,044,134,483


99.9761%

New Investors

$

15,000,000


250,000

 

0.0239%

Total Shares after offering




1,044,384,483


100.0000%








 

26



PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

 

The Company is currently quoted on the OTCPink under the symbol ARMT. The Company fully intends to have the Shares listed on NASDAQ or quoted on the OTCQB. If no trading market develops for our common stock, it will be difficult to sell your shares or, if sold, it may be difficult to resell the shares for a price at or above the current offering price. Even if a trading market is established, there is no assurance that such trading market can be sustained. We are offering up to a total of 1,000,000 Shares of Class B common stock in a best effort, direct public offering, by our officers and directors. We will initially sell the shares in this Offering exclusively through our officers and directors. They will receive no commission from the sale of any Shares. They will not register as broker/dealers under the 1934 Act in reliance upon Rule 3a4-1 under the 1934 Act. Our officers and directors may rely upon Rule 3a4-1 because (i) they are not subject to any statutory disqualifications, as defined in Section 3(a)(39) of the 1934 Act, (ii) they will not be compensated in connection with the sale of the Companys securities by the payment of commissions or other remuneration based either directly or indirectly on transactions in the securities, (iii) they are not associated persons of a broker or dealer, (iv) they will primarily perform, at the end of the offering, substantial duties for or on behalf of the Company, otherwise than in connection with transactions in securities, (v) they were not a broker or dealer, or associated persons thereof, within the preceding 12 months, (vi) they do not participate in selling an offering of securities for any issuer more than once every 12 months, except in reliance on (iv) and (v) above. The Company will register as the issuer-agent in those states requiring such registration.


The Company may decide to engage an underwriter in a best, efforts underwritten public offering. In the event we engage an underwriter, we will file a post-effective amendment to update our prospectus and will file the applicable underwriting agreement. In such an event, the Plan of Distribution shall be expanded to include the method of sales of such underwriter.underwriter . The offering price is $60.00 per share. The offering will terminate 24 months from the date of this prospectus or when all of the Shares are sold, whichever comes first. We also have the right to terminate this offering at any time prior to the expiration of the offering period. We will use our best efforts to sell as many Shares as possible up to the maximum offering amount of 1,000,000 Shares. There is no minimum offering amount. We may accept or reject any subscription amount from any investor in our sole discretion or we may accept only part of a subscription amount. In the event we engage an underwriter, we anticipate incurring up to $4,200,000.00 for underwriters commission. In addition, we expect to incur approximately $40,000 in other offering expenses

 

 

Procedures for Subscribing in the direct public offering:

 

If you decide to subscribe for any Shares in this offering, you must:

 

1. Execute and deliver a subscription agreement, and

 

2. Deliver a check or certified funds to us. Any subscription may be accepted or rejected, in whole or in part, in the sole discretion of management.

 

All checks for subscriptions must be made payable to "Ameri Metro, Inc."

 

Right to Reject Subscriptions

 

We have the right to accept or reject subscriptions in whole or in part, for any reason or for no reason. All monies from rejected subscriptions will be returned immediately by us to the subscriber, without interest or deductions. Subscriptions for Shares will be accepted or rejected within five business days after we receive them. Furthermore, once a subscription agreement is accepted, it will be executed without reconfirmation to or from the subscriber. Once the Company accepts a subscription, the subscriber cannot withdraw it unless otherwise dictated by state law.


27



BUSINESS

 

The Business


The Company is focused on development of transportation facilities, including but not limited to high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related and ancillary transportation businesses, inland ports, sea ports, airports, and toll roads for the affiliated companies. The Company is contracted to build, manufacturing facilities for composite rebar, rail road ties and Damar Corporation LLC products, in addition to fiber optic lines, any and all utilities whether underground or overhead, any and all outdoor advertisement signage, travel plazas, natural gas pipelines, distillate pipelines, motels, hotels, sewer, power grids, cell phone towers, earth stations, fast food and restaurant establishments, shops and other aspects of construction, technology parks, town Centers, together with ancillary land development projects, sale of goods and services to government, civilian and commercial end users.

The Company anticipates that it will, directly or through subsidiaries or affiliates, develop plans, and then coordinate and supervise the financing, construction and development of such transportation projects by bringing together the resources, plans, financing, approvals and technology needed to implement such transportation systems.

The debt offering of the projects mentioned above will be borne by each affiliated entity or entities via bond offerings. The Company will provide construction services for fee and consulting services for fee. For more information see Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44.

[s1a1201701_r1010.gif]


The Company has commenced its revenue producing operations. The Company has been in joint meetings with affiliate entities and private entities, public municipalities and regional governmental agencies. The Company and affiliate entities met with and made presentations to these parties, associated with projects it intends to be the super general contractor to develop, relating to sea ports, airports, rail corridors, toll roads, inland ports, intermodal facilities, sewer, water and power grids, all being revenue producing projects.

 The Company recognizes the $57 Trillion Dollar Infrastructure Market as identified in McKinseys report, the need and demand for alternative transportation, high speed rail, sea ports, intermodal ports and toll roads, Boeing reports and Society of Civil Engineers reports. It is increasingly important as the United States adopts policies to attempt to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels and to improve its infrastructure and transportation systems for global competiveness. The Companys intention is to profit from such opportunities and has structured itself to be the leading provider of such services in the United States and globally.

The current project beyond the planning stage is Port Trajan:

The following discussion is contingent on subsequent financing being obtained.

On August 8, 2016, Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement for construction (Construction Agreement) with Port De Claudius, Inc. (PDC). Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the Company shall perform all tasks and actions required to develop and construct the Port Trajan Pa. commercial properties (the Project) and to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering, and related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project. Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the specifications, designs, construction standards, subcontractor agreements, insurance requirements, hiring and employment policies and similar items shall be developed by the Company, subject to approval by PDC. The Company shall assure that the Project is constructed according to specifications and requirements imposed by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PADOT) and the Federal Highway Administration. The Company shall supervise all phases of the construction of the Project, and it shall be responsible to PDC for all acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, agents, consultants and other parties under its control. The Company shall be responsible for assuring that the construction of the Project is performed in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the highest standards of care for the industry.

The Project consists of two phases, phase one closing to take place on or before September 21, 2016 (Phase One) and phase two to take place on or before August 31, 2017. Phase One consists of land purchase and onsite /off site improvement and its estimated cost, for both phases, is Two Billion Dollars ($2,000,000,000), at cost plus forty percent (40%), plus two percent (2%) for the increase in inflation regardless of the cost to the Company to perform the required services. In no event will the profit to the Company from the amount paid by PDC be less than Eight Hundred Million Dollars ($800,000,000). A mobilization fee of $2,729,514 shall be due and payable by PDC to the Company upon the closing of Bond funding for Phase One.

On September 11, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement of sale and or assignment of assets in Phase One (the Sale Agreement) with Jewel's Real-Estate 10-86 Master LLLP (the Seller), Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc., division of Hi Speed Rail Facilities Inc. (the Financier), PDC, and HSRF Statutory Trust as Trustee (the "Trustee"), as dictated by the Construction Agreement. The Sale Agreement was thereafter amended on September 13, 2016, in order to change the closing date of the transaction to October 14, 2016. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement, the Company and the Seller shall sell and assign all rights, title and interest in and to any contractual agreements to PDC on completion of Phase One, as governed by the Construction Agreement. The cost of Phase One is $950,000,000. The net Phase One revenue to the Company is $66,719,514. For more information see Exhibit 10.40, 10.41, 10.42, 10.43, 10.44.

Funding for individual projects will occur from bond offerings organized through various nonprofit entities, High Speed Rail Facilities Inc., High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc., Alabama Toll Facilities Inc., Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority Inc. and organizations sponsored or affiliated with municipal and government agencies as well as from issuances of stock and debt-financing. 

As to the relationship of affiliated companies, the Company holds 25% non-voting, non-control interest of each affiliated company and 75% of the ownership is under the interest of Mr. Mathias. The affiliated companies provide the work order to the Company and wholly owned subsidiary, Global Transportation Infrastructure Inc. (GTI) as super general contractor services. The Companys facilitation is limited to assisting the introduction of certain trades project package, including appraisals, estimates, obtaining contracts and sub-contractors, for the development of the facilities and infrastructure projects. The Company will assist affiliated entities at a cost plus up to forty percent fee, for presenting the complete project, working as project supervisor and coordinator between non-profit entities and affiliate entities, which are working with private entities, public municipalities and regional governmental agencies. For more information see Exhibit 10.52, 10.53, 10.54, 10.55.

Currently also, through its wholly owned subsidiary, GTI, the Company is involved in the planning of the future development of a new toll road in the southeast United States. The Company through assignment of rights from Penndel Land Company, for more information see Exhibit 10.45, 10.46, 10.47, to finance, develop and construction a 357 mile toll road in the State of Alabama as outlined in Alabama House Joint Resolution H. J. R. 459 & H. J. R. 456. For more information see Exhibit 10.13. The Company acquired from Penndel Land Company (majority owned by Mr. Mathias) the contract rights to a construction agreement with ATFI, a non-profit company supported by the State of Alabama to act as the exclusive entity as set

forth in H.J.R 459 and H.J.R. 456 project developer for such a toll road an on which  Mr. Mathias served as one of its four directors. When the Company secures financing, ATFI will effect a bond offering to purchase the land on which the toll road is to be located.


In support of H.J.R. 459 and H.J.R.456 the following ancillary projects are being planned.


1.

Design built inland port called Port De Claudius;

2.

Design built airport called Sarah Jewel Mathias International Airport (KSJM);

3.

Design built air cargo port called Port of Ostia;

4.

Design built railroad and train stations;

5.

Design built Fiber Optic Lines;

6.

Design built All Utilities underground or overhead;

7.

Design built Power Grids;

8.

Design built Cell Phone Towers;

9.

Design built Motels, Travel Plazas, Fast Food Establishments;

10.

Design built Outdoor Advertisements, Signage;

11.

Design built Natural Gas Pipelines & Distillate Pipelines;


Shah Mathias, founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company, has established a series of corporations (affiliate entities) with which to effect the transactions and development of the projects envisioned by the Company including the Port Trajan Facility, high speed rail projects and the Alabama Toll Road.  The Company has envisioned long-range ideas and plans to develop currently undeveloped areas through which the planned Alabama toll road will traverse. These plans include the development of an airport, sea shipping port and a high speed rail line.


For the purpose of this Registration Statement, affiliated companies are defined as entities where the Company holds a 25% ownership interest, non-voting, non-controlling shareholder interest per the Opportunity License Agreement. For more information see Exhibit 10.51.


The Company has developed a mechanism for its sustainability and as to conducting contractual relationships with each affiliated company (s) to maintain its independence and risk mitigation.


Below are the three steps the Company interface s with the entity:

Step 1 - as consultant for fee

Step 2 - as provider for construction services for fee

Step 3 - as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue)


Post Construction Revenue: Are those revenues that are sustained per the affiliate operations and are a direct result of 25% ownership interest, non-voting, non-controlling shareholder interest, in the affiliated company or companies.


Affiliated Companies:


1.

HSR Freight line, Inc. Designed to handle all services for use of track time and trains for freight and freight forwarding services.

2.

HSR Passenger Services, Inc. Designed to handle rail ticketing booking, reservations, and food services.

3.

HSR Technologies, Inc. Designed to handle all building of suites and manufacturing of trains and rail tracks and provide fiber optics, telecommunications, and related technologies services.

4.

HSR Logistics, Inc. Designed to handle all purchasing functions.

5.

KSJM International Airport, Inc. Designed to eventually create an airport facility in inland Alabama

6.

Port Of Ostia, Inc. Designed to handle all air cargo if and when an airport facility is created.

7.

Port of De Claudius, Inc. Designed to handle sea container and port operations.

8.

AMERI Cement, Inc. Designed to handle cement needs for building projects including Alabama toll road.

9.

Lord Chauffeurs LTD: Designed to operate all passenger ground transportation.

10.

Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc. Designed to provide utility and maintenance service to above entities.

11.

Penn Insurance Services LLC. Designed to provide insurance service to above entities.

12.

Cape Horn Abstracting, Co. Designed to land title examination services.

13.

Eastern Development & Design, Inc.  Designed to provide all civil engineering and architectural service.

14.

Slater & West, Inc.  Designed to handle contract administration services and work force H R matters.

15.   Malibu Homes, Inc. Designed to establish residential home building services.

16.

Platinum Media, Inc. Designed to provide all media related services.

Eastern Development and Design (ED&D) (Other Related Party Agreements) to do all the civil engineering work for the toll road, Port De Claudius, KSJM and Port of Ostia. ED&D is an experienced civil engineering company that has been operating since 1993.


The Company has, via ED&D, engaged Armstrong Consulting Inc., for the airport engineering and planning. Armstrong Consulting Inc. is an experienced airport planning and engineer design company. It will engineer and design standards from FAA AC150/5300-13 airport design and FAR PART 77.


The Company has approached a major aircraft manufacturer to help launch air cargo operation at KSJM and Port of Ostia. A major aircraft manufacturer has indicated that the Company should move forward with its business plan.


Relco has been engaged by HSR Technologies, to provide exclusive use of DMU rail technologies and use its know-how for manufacturing of train sets meeting the 49 CFR Part 238 compliant DMU in current venue service that meets or exceeds new Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and America Public Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specification. Relco is a fifty year old company and has provided services for Union Pacific, CSX Transportation, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Kansas City Southern Railway, Canadian National and numerous others.


The Company will build seventeen hundred miles of railroad tracks in parallel with ATFI. The Company has plans, through its affiliates, to build four tracks north and south bound, two tracks for passenger services and two tracks for freight. Volkmann Railroad Builders has been engaged by ARMT to construct and built the railroad. Volkmann is a thirty five year old company that has built railroads for NASA, the mining industry, oil and gas exploration and freight carriers.


The Company has engaged consultants such as Transportation Economics Management System Inc. (TEMS). TEMS (Other Related Party Agreements) is a global transportation consulting firm. It is responsible for the transportation planning and system analysis, which includes the development of the passenger and freight forecasting models.


The Company has engaged with Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS) to manage and act as port agent at Port Claudius and Port Of Ostia. ISS is a global operation from sixty eight countries, six hundred ports that directs traffic from sea and air cargo to and from the ports. They have been in business since 1875.


NP&G Innovations Inc. has been engaged to manufacturer railroad ties for the company, through HSR Technologies. NP&G is the original inventors of green technology railroad ties. Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) has been engaged to manufacture the composite rebar, through HSR Technologies for the company. MCT is the original developer of technology of the composite rebar. The Company will need approximately four hundred million linear feet of composite rebar to be used in building the Alabama Toll Road.


ARMT entered into a contract on June 10, 2010 for the acquisition of the patents, rights, titles, and business of Damar Corporation LLC, the inventor/developer/manufacturer of Damar TruckDeck. The Damar TruckDeck is a flexible truck deck storage and organization system with an integrated frame allowing the cargo deck to be used as a hauling surface. ARMT shall receive all rights and title to the patents, the TruckDeck system, and all related assets for a purchase price of $750,000 payable as $500,000 cash and the remaining $250,000 payable in the form of 7,500 shares of ARMTs common stock. The cash portion is payable within 90 days of the successful completion of the registration as a publicly traded company pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. The intended use of these assets will equip Company field construction vehicle fleets with the needed tool storage containment and hauling capabilities. The Company will also capitalize on the opportunity of marketing these products to the United States consumer market through existing relationships by Damar Corporation LLC and large big box retail chains.

PAYMENT: $500,000

Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) has been engaged to manufacture the composite rebar, through HSR Technologies for the Company. MCT is the original developer of technology of the composite rebar. The Company will need approximately four hundred million linear feet of composite rebar to be used in building the Alabama Toll Road. The Company will also sell the rebar to others for commercial use. Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) offers a plant set up and licence to manufacture the rebar contract for their technology to manufacture composite Re-bar. (C RB). The Company will pay $4,750,000 to HSR Technologies for customizing composite rebar manufacturing facilities, to meet the Alabama Toll Road Specifications. For more information see Exhibit 10.48.

PAYMENT: $4,750,000


On March 1, 2011, the Company entered into a three month agreement with Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) regarding consulting services in relation to the development of high-speed rail and other transportation projects by the Company.  The agreement was initially extended until March 1, 2012 and subsequently extended until September 2013.  Compensation for services under the agreement may not exceed $135,408 unless otherwise authorized by a supplemental agreement.  Currently, the project is anticipated to cost $460,000 and will take six months to complete including presentation to potential investors.


PAYMENT: $460,000


NPG Inovations entered into an exclusive licensing agreement rights involving two US patents, to manufacture composite rail road ties to HSR Technologies, Inc.  The Company has agreed to purchase from HSR Technologies those exclusive licensing agreement rights for $8,000,000. The Company intends to use the rail road tie technology in the future rail projects when the projects are funded.  The Company also has the right to exploit the intellectual property in other wold markets as well. For more information see Exhibit 10.49.


PAYMENT: $8,000,000.


US Railcar  /HSR Technologies, Inc. Exclusive Technology use Agreement

For exclusive use of DMU rail technologies and use of its know-how for manufacturing

of train sets meeting the 49 CFR Part 238 compliant DMU in current revenue service.

That meets or exceeds new Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and American Public

Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specifications.

US Railcar entered into a technology use agreement with HSR Technologies, Inc. The Company has agreed to purchase those rights from HSR Technologies for $25,000,000. The Company intends to use train sets in the future rail projects when the projects are funded. The Company also has the right to exploit the sale of train sets in other wold markets as well. For more information see Exhibit 10.50.


PAYMENT: $25,000,000.


The Company (ARMT), as described in herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44 is focused on development of transportation facilities, including but not limited to high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related and ancillary transportation businesses, inland ports, sea ports, airports, and toll roads. The Company intends to secure manufacturing and technologies together with ancillary land development projects, sale of goods and services to government, civilian and commercial end users. 

The Company anticipates that it will, directly or through subsidiaries or affiliates, develop plans, and then coordinate and supervise the financing, construction and development of such transportation projects by bringing together the resources, plans, financing, approvals and technology needed to implement such transportation systems.

[s1a1201701_r1012.gif]

The Company has not yet commenced its revenue producing operations; however, it has been meeting with and making presentations to parties associated with projects it intends to develop, including parties in the United States related to a sea port and a rail project. The Company believes that the need, demand and usage of alternative transportation such as high speed rail, ports and toll roads are increasingly important as the United States adopts policies to attempt to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels and to improve its infrastructure and transportation systems. The Company intends to develop and prepare the designs and concepts for feasible and profitable regional transportation and infrastructure related projects utilizing existing and new infrastructure. The Company will prepare the complete project package including appraisals and estimates and will obtain contracts for the development of the facilities and infrastructure and purchase of the equipment. The Company will present the complete project, working as project supervisor and coordinator, to municipalities and regional government agencies. 

Funding for individual projects of the Company will occur from bond offerings, as noted in herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44, organized through various nonprofit entities, High Speed Rail Facilities Inc., High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc., Alabama Toll Facilities Inc., Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority Inc. and organizations sponsored or affiliated with municipal and government agencies as well as from issuances of stock and debt-financing.  Certain of these nonprofit entities or organizations may themselves be affiliated with, or related to, the Company and assist, or work in conjunction with, the Company in securing contracts and funds to develop projects.  



28



Through its subsidiary, GTI, the Company is also involved in the planning of the future development of a new toll road in the southeast United States. The Company through assignment of rights from Penndel Land Company, to finance, develop and construction a 357 mile toll road in the State of Alabama as outlined in Alabama House Joint Resolution H. J. R. 459 & H. J. R. 456, herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44.  The Company acquired from Penndel Land Company (majority owned by the former CEO of ARMT)ARMTShah Mathias) the contract rights to a construction agreement with the Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. ("ATFI", a non-profit company supported by the State of Alabama to act as the exclusive entity as set forth in H.J.R 459 and H.J.R. 456 project developer for such a toll road an on which the former CEO ofMr. Mathiasof the Company served as one of its four directors). When the Company secures financing, ATFI will effect a bond offering to purchase the land on which the toll road is to be located.


In support of H.J.R. 459 and H.J.R.456 the following ancillary projects are being planned.


1.

Design built inland port called Port De Claudius- herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

2.

Design built airport called Sarah Jewel Mathias International Airport (KSJM) herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

3.

Design built air cargo port called Port of Ostia herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

4.

Design built railroad and train stations herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

5.

Design built Fiber Optic Lines herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

6.  ��   

Design built All Utilities underground or overhead herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

7.

Design built Power Grids herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

8.

Design built Cell Phone Towers herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

9.

Design built Motels, Travel Plazas, Fast Food Establishments herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44;

10.

Design built Outdoor Advertisements, Signage herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.443;

11.

Design built Natural Gas Pipelines & Distillate Pipelines herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.443

11.  Design built Natural Gas Pipelines & Distillate Pipelines herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44

29;



Shah Mathias, Founderfounder,Head of Mergers and Acquisitionsand Business Development, and non-board member Presidentof the CompanyFounder of the Company, has established a series of corporations with which to effect the transactions and development of the projects envisioned by the Company including the Port Trajan Facility, high speed rail projects and the Alabama Toll Road.  The Company has envisioned long-range ideas and plans to develop currently undeveloped areas through which the planned Alabama toll road will traverse. These plans include the development of an airport, sea shipping port and a high speed rail line.


1.

HSR Freight line, Inc.Designed to handle all services for use of track time and trains for freight and freight forwarding services.

2.

HSR Passenger Services, Inc.Designed to handle rail ticketing booking, reservations, and food services.

3.

HSR Technologies, Inc.Designed to handle all building of suites and manufacturing of trains and rail tracks and provide fiber optics, telecommunications, and related technologies services.

4.

HSR Logistics, Inc.Designed to handle all purchasing functions.

5.

KSJM International Airport, Inc. Designed to eventually create an airport facility in inland Alabama

6.

Port Of Ostia, Inc.Designed to handle all air cargo if and when an airport facility is created.

7.

Port of De Claudius, Inc.Designed to handle sea container and port operations.

8.

AMERI Cement, Inc.Designed to handle cement needs for building Alabama toll road.

9.

Lord Chauffeurs LTD: Designed to operate all passenger ground transportation.

10.

Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc.Designed to provide utility and maintenance service to above entities.

11.

Penn Insurance Services LLC.Designed to provide insurance service to above entities.

12.

Cape Horn Abstracting, Co.Designed to land title examination services.

13.

Eastern Development & Design, Inc. Designed to provide all civil engineering and architectural service.

14.

Slater & West, Inc. Designed to handle contract administration services and work force H R matters.

15.

Malibu Homes, Inc.Designed to establish residential home building services.

16.

Platinum Media, Inc.Designed to provide all media related services.



Eastern Development and Design (ED&D) (Other Related Party Agreements) to do all the civil engineering work for the toll road, Port De Claudius, KSJM and Port of Ostia. ED&D is an experienced civil engineering company that has been operating since 1993.


The Company has, via ED&D, engaged Armstrong Consulting Inc., for the airport engineering and planning. Armstrong Consulting Inc. is an experienced airport planning and engineer design company. It will engineer and design standards from FAA AC150/5300-13 airport design and FAR PART 77.


The Company has approached a major aircraft manufacturer to help launch air cargo operation at KSJM and Port of Ostia. A major aircraft manufacturer has indicated that the Company should move forward with its business plan.


Relco has been engaged to provide exclusive use of DMU rail technologies and use its know-how for manufacturing of train sets meeting the 49 CFR Part 238 compliant DMU in current venue service that meets or exceeds new Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and America Public Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specification. Relco is a fifty year old company and has provided services for Union Pacific, CSX Transportation, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Kansas City Southern Railway, Canadian National and numerous others.


The Company will build seventeen hundred miles of railroad tracks in parallel with ATFI. The Company has plans, through its affiliates, to build four tracks north and south bound, two tracks for passenger services and two tracks for freight. Volkmann Railroad Builders has been engaged to construct and built the railroad. Volkmann is a thirty five year old company that has built railroads for NASA, the mining industry, oil and gas exploration and freight carriers.




30



The Company has engaged consultants such as Transportation Economics Management System Inc. (TEMS). TEMS (Other Related Party Agreements) is a global transportation consulting firm. It is responsible for the transportation planning and system analysis, which includes the development of the passenger and freight forecasting models.

The Company has engaged with Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS) to manage and act as port agent at Port Claudius and Port Of Ostia. ISS is a global operation from sixty eight countries, six hundred ports that directs traffic from sea and air cargo to and from the ports. They have been in business since 1875.


NP&G Innovations Inc. has been engaged to manufacturer railroad ties for the company. NP&G is the original inventors of green technology railroad ties. Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) has been engaged to manufacture the composite rebar. MCT is the original developer of technology of the composite rebar. The Company will need approximately four hundred million linear feet of composite rebar to be used in building the Alabama Toll Road.


ARMT entered into a contract on June 10, 2010 for the acquisition of the patents, rights, titles, and business of Damar Corporation LLC, the inventor/developer/manufacturer of Damar TruckDeck. The Damar TruckDeck is a flexible truck deck storage and organization system with an integrated frame allowing the cargo deck to be used as a hauling surface. ARMT shall receive all rights and title to the patents, the TruckDeck system, and all related assets for a purchase price of $750,000 payable as $500,000 cash and the remaining $250,000 payable in the form of 7,500 shares of ARMTs common stock. The cash portion is payable within 90 days of the successful completion of the registration as a publicly traded company pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.

PAYMENT: $500,000

Purchase Secured the technology to manufacture composite Re-bar. (C RB).


PAYMENT: $4,750,000


On March 1, 2011, the Company entered into a three month agreement with Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) regarding consulting services in relation to the development of high-speed rail and other transportation projects by the Company.  The agreement was initially extended until March 1, 2012 and subsequently extended until September 2013.  Compensation for services under the agreement may not exceed $135,408 unless otherwise authorized by a supplemental agreement.  Currently, the project is anticipated to cost $460,000 and will take six months to complete including presentation to potential investors.


PAYMENT: $460,000


NPG. / HSR Technologies, Inc. RAIL TIE Licensing of Intellectual exclusive licensing agreement involving two US patents.


PAYMENT: $8,000,000.


US Railcar Company. Hrs. Technologies, Inc.

Exclusive Technology use Agreement

For exclusive use of DMU rail technologies and use of its know-how for manufacturing

Of train sets meeting the 49 CFR Part 238 compliant DMU in current revenue service

That meets or exceeds new Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and American Public

Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specifications.


PAYMENT: $25,000,000.

 

31



Business Plan


The Company anticipates that it will, directly or through subsidiaries or affiliates, develop plans, and then coordinate and supervise the financing, construction and development of such transportation projects by bringing together the resources, plans, financing, approvals and technology needed to implement such transportation systems.

The Company recognizes the $57 Trillion Dollar Infrastructure Market as identified in McKinseys report, the need and demand for alternative transportation, high speed rail, sea ports, intermodal ports and toll roads, Boeing reports and Society of Civil Engineers reports. It is increasingly important as the United States adopts policies to attempt to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels and to improve its infrastructure and transportation systems for global competiveness. The Companys intention is to profit from such opportunities and has structured itself to be the leading provider of such services in the United States and globally.

The Company will facilitate the development of transportation facilities, including but not limited to high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related and ancillary transportation businesses, inland ports, sea ports, airports, and toll roads. The Company intends to secure manufacturing and technologies together with ancillary land development projects, sale of goods and services to government, civilian and commercial end users.  The high-speed rail plan to be presented by the Company will likely utilize existing rail rights-of-way to connect several metropolitan areas and states serving expanding populations.


Funding for individual projects will occur from bond offerings organized through various nonprofit entities, High Speed Rail Facilities Inc., High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc., Alabama Toll Facilities Inc., Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority Inc. and organizations sponsored or affiliated with municipal and government agencies as well as from issuances of stock and debt-financing. 

Funding for individual projects of the Company will occur from bond offerings, as noted in herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44, organized through various nonprofit entities, High Speed Rail Facilities Inc., High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc., Alabama Toll Facilities Inc., Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority Inc. and organizations sponsored or affiliated with municipal and government agencies as well as from issuances of stock and debt-financing.  Certain of these nonprofit entities or organizations may themselves be affiliated with, or related to, the Company and assist, or work in conjunction with, the Company in securing contracts and funds to develop projects. The major elements of the plan would include:


Trade and Transportation Corridors

·

Development of container ports for Class C, D and E ships

·

Development of inland transportation corridors including new greenfield highways and railroads

·

Building of inland ports and multimodal transportation centers

·

Development of new urban centers along the new infrastructure

·

Development of ancillary facilities including airport (express service), distribution centers, and logistics centers.


High Speed Rail

·

Introduction of modern rail equipment operating at speeds up to 250 mph

·

Use of existing rail rights-of-way to connect rural, small urban and major metropolitan areas

·

Track improvement, including replacement and upgrades, additional sidings, signal and communications systems, and grade-crossing improvements

·

Building of new greenfield routes

·

Construction or improvement of railroad grade crossings and passenger stations

·

Acquiring new train equipment including train sets and spares


Transportation Infrastructure


Development of new vehicles and infrastructure to support the highway and rail systems that will be used in Trade and Transportation Corridors and the High Speed Rail Systems.


Supporting Ancillary Development

·

Development or expansion of a feeder bus system linking outlying areas to railroad stations

·

Operation of a "hub-and-spoke" passenger rail system providing service to and through one or more major hubs to locations throughout the United States

·

Provision of multi-modal connections to improve system access, hotels, retail, parking garages, sorting facilities / distribution facilities


Supporting Transportation Systems

·

Ancillary development opportunities, airports, inland ports, sea ports, toll roads and technology parks


The following discussion outlines the steps that as the Company anticipates that will occur in regard to the adoption and implementation of Trade and Transportation and a high-speed rail system by a regional or local municipality.  To date, the Company has not developed any rail systems. 

The Company plans that it will prepare the feasibility studyand Investment Grade stud ies y and locate contractors and manufacturers to complete and work and provide cost estimates. BecauseTrade and Transportation corridors use technology well known to US contractors, however, B b ecause highspeed rail travel is already inplace in much of Europe and Asia, the Company anticipates working with European companies to furnish the highspeed equipment, such as locomotives and passenger cars.

The Company will put proposed contracts together with the supporting feasibility study, appraisals, cost/benefit analysis, TEMS study, transportation history and other data to create a complete regional project proposal.  The Company will then present such project proposals to the municipalities (state or local) as a complete and finished project. The local or regional municipality will then independently analyze and discuss the Company's proposal.  If accepted, the Company anticipates that, upon approval, the local municipality will effectuate a bond offering for the funding of the different high-speed rail project.project s .  The Company anticipates that the projects will be financed by bonds or indentures offered by sponsored or affiliated non-profit organizations of the applicable local or municipal government or agency.  Such non-profit entities may also be affiliates or companies related to the Company.



32



Once a proposed Trade and Transportation or high-speed rail project is accepted and a financing bond issue is effected by the municipality, the Company will act as the project manager and oversee the entire project including not only the development of the project but its continued operations as well. The Company will also serve as the main central point for coordination of and between the municipalities, contractors, and operators of the project and ,once established, the rail system.

Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc.

In 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with HSRF (one of the Company's related nonprofit companies) for the purpose of construction of projects consisting of the financing, construction and operation of Trade and Transportation and high speed rail and related projects across the United States. HSRF is designed to focus on the building of train tracks and stations.  Pursuant to the agreement between the Company and HSRF, the Company will act as the agent and representative of HSRF to perform all required tasks and actions to develop and construct such projects. The Company anticipates that having this agreement in place and by having HSRF already organized will expedite the process of commencing a project once the Company designs and develops and secures or raises funds to commence a project.

Hi Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc.

In 2010, the Company entered into a written agreement with HSRFP (one of the Company's related nonprofit companies) for the purpose of construction of projects consisting of the financing, construction and operation of various high speed rail and related projects across the United States. Pursuant to such agreement between the Company and HSRFP, the Company was appointed as the agent and representative of HSRFP to perform all required tasks and actions to develop and construct such projects. HSRFP was organized to provide a vehicle to issue bonds and help secure infrastructure projects for the Company focusing on facilities ancillary to the high speed rail such as rail yards rail, rail assembly plants maintenance facilities. The Company anticipates that having this agreement in place and by having HSRF already organized will expedite the process of commencing a project once the Company secures or raises funds to commence a project.

Master Trust Indenture Agreement

On December 1, 2010, HSRF entered into a Master Trust Indenture agreement providing that HSRF serve as trustee for a bond offering of $15,000,000,000 of HSRF Revenue Bonds Series 2010. In April 2012 this Indenture was amended to reflect a Master Indenture of $20,000,000,000. The Company will act as developer for the project financed by the Hi Speed Indenture. The Master Trust Indenture provides the basic terms and conditions of any bond issuance such as use of an escrow agent, rights of bond holders, sale of bonds, etc.   

ING Investment Management

Each of the nonprofits has entered into an investment management agreement with ING Investment Management to manage any funds raised in bond offerings and to provide its investment advisory services.  This non-binding agreement would only take effect upon the raising of revenues bonds.  ING Investment Management would serve to invest, reinvest and supervise the management of any such funds while such funds were held in an investment account and until use for the intended purposes.

Alabama Toll Road

Mobile (ATFITrade and Transportation Corridor (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.) Intermodal Corridor

A preliminary analysis of the corridor suggested that because of the opening of the Panama Canal and because Mobile is one of the only two Gulf ports that can facilitate the large container vessels that need 50 feet of water, the toll road could become part of a Mobile Trade and Transportation Corridor. As a result, an evaluation should be made of extending the corridor north along the west side of the Appalachians, a region that is today served by West Coast Ports. To assist Ameri Metro in completing an Investment Grade Study for the corridor, the following research/review team has been assembled to assess the analysis by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS).

Mobile Intermodal Corridor, Research Review Team

Team Member

Affiliation

·

Dr. Mark Burton, PhD      

    ��           University of Tennessee

·

Dr. David Clarke, PhD

University of Tennessee

·

Mr. Rick Tucker

Port of Huntsville, AL

·

Mr. Jimmy Lyons

Port of Mobile, AL

·

Dr. Craig Phillip, PhD

Vanderbilt University

·

Dr. Ted Grossardt, PhD

University of Kentucky

·

Mr. Kent Sowards

Marshall University

·

Dr. Mike Hicks, PhD

Ball State University

·

Mr. Scott Hercik

Appalachian Regional Commission

33

The Company is working to develop a project to build a toll road in the State of Alabama, per Resolution SJR-56 by Legislature of State of Alabama and is in the process of raising funding. In 2010, the Company was developing this project at the time of the merger with Yellowwood. The planned toll road is designated as a 35235 7 2 mile 4-lane road designed to be built from Orange Beach, Alabama to the Tennessee state line with the intent of connecting various rural sections of Alabama to Tennessee and more urban areas. The toll road that would connect various rural sections of Alabama to Tennessee and with its more urban areas.


As its first step, Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (ATFI) was created and obtained status as a nonprofit corporation pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.  As a nonprofit corporation, ATFI is allowed to make bond offerings in order to finance the cost of acquisition and construction and equipping of the toll road project.  Mr. Shah Mathias (the founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company)Company founder of the Company ) was one of the directors of ATFI and has subsequently resigned his position.


In 2007, the toll road project was presented to the Alabama legislature which on June 7, 2007, adopted Act no. 2007-506 entitled "Expressing Support for the Alabama Toll Road Project".  This Act stated that it recognized the need to utilize other financial resources to meet the needs of that highways and other infrastructure items such as that offered by ATFI. The Act urged approval of the bonds offered by ATFI as special revenue bonds with the project eventually vesting to the state upon retirement of the bonds.  The Act further supports designating ATFI as the exclusive entity for creation and development of the toll road project.


As a second step, on September 23, 2009, Penndel Land Company (Penndel), a company wholly owned by Shah Mathias entered into an agreement with ATFI by which Penndel was appointed as the agent and representative of ATFI to perform all required tasks and actions to develop and construct the toll road.  


Thirdly, on December 1, 2010, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure, Inc. ("GTI") in the state of Delaware to provide development and construction services for the Alabama highway project and to include securing financing for the design, planning, engineering and related costs of construction.


In December 2010, Penndel assigned its agreements with ATFI to GTI. As such the Company, through its subsidiary, GTI, has the development rights for such toll road. Under the terms of the agreement, GTI will provide development and construction services. GTI will also act as an agent and representative to take actions necessary to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering and related soft and hard costs of the construction of a toll road in the state of Alabama and related activities.

Alabama Indenture Agreement

On December 1, 2010, ATFI entered into a Master Trust Indenture agreement with as HSRF Trustee, which has agreed to serve as the trustee for the bond offering of up to $7,000,000,000 of ATFI Revenue Bonds once it determines to effect such an offering if ever. The Alabama Indenture indicates that the developer for the project will be GTI.  In April 2012 the Alabama Indenture was amended to reflect a Master Indenture of $20,000,000,000.  The Master Agreement provides the basic terms and conditions of any bond issuance such as use of an escrow agent, rights of bond holders, sale of bonds, etc. At the time that any bonds are to be issued, the Company will engage an asset manager and trustee for the indenture.


Proposed Investment Grade Study



Alabama Trade and Transportation Corridor including Alabama Toll Road Facility

34To assess this project, Ameri Metro will complete an Investment Grade Study of the corridors potential. The following proposal outlines the study that will be taken to evaluate the project.  This proposal is the standard format that Ameri Metro will use to assess Trade and Transportation Corridors.

1

Introduction

The purpose of this Investment Grade study is to evaluate the potential for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, as an adjunct to Port Mobile to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between the Appalachians in the east, and the Mississippi in the west, and stretching as far north as the markets of mid-America including Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. The area is largely served today by West Coast Ports that rely on relatively expensive rail and truck shipments to these inland markets, but are low cost due to the large ships that can access West Coast Ports. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile corridor has the potential to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving these markets.


The reason for this is that the Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships (50 foot depth) that will be able to access the gulf and east coasts with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged, this will reduce the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from West Coast Ports to the Port of Mobile.


ARMT(               Exhibit 1: Potential Port of Mobile Hinterland with Post-Panamax Max Ships

[s1a1201701_r1013.jpg]

Exhibit 2: Mobile Trade (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.) & Transport Corridor: Population and Required Linkage

[s1a1201701_r1014.jpg] 

ARMT is proposing that new infrastructure be developed at the Port of Mobile, and for inland access to the markets that may be served by the Port of Mobile in the future. The new infrastructure will include a new toll highway, a freight rail line from the Port of Mobile to Inland Ports at key locations in the Trade and Transport Corridor, and a cargo airport to expand the capabilities of the corridor to include air freight similar to the airport in Alliance, Texas.

To assess the potential for the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, ARMT has asked Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) to prepare a scope of work that will provide the business case for the project. The project will answer the following questions

·

What is the business case for investing in rail along Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor?

·

How will the Port of Mobile and the communities along the Trade and Transport Corridor benefit?

·

Can the private sector play a role in developing the corridor, and what financial returns will be generated?

·

How can Port of Mobile support the development of Inland Ports in serving the hinterland and trade market?

·

What are the kinds and sources of private funding (revenue, loans, grants, bonds, letters of credit, etc.) that can be obtained to support and develop the project?

2

Study Approach

The purpose of the Business Plan study is to assess at an Investment Grade level of detail, the market opportunities, physical facility needs, financial and economic returns, business arrangements and implementation timeline for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor as a trade corridor for Port of Mobile between Port Mobile and inland markets.

In carrying out its initial review, TEMS has already shown there is a prima facia case for the investment.  However, the review was based on an analysis using existing data and models including the Panama Canal Route Choice model and the National Ports model.  Both models need updating to 2015 to reflect the post 2008 recession economy and the latest changes in the development of the Panama Canal, US Ports, and marine economics.

In addition, the preliminary study made a number of assumptions about the institutional structures that would be adopted by the Port and Railroads.  In the Business Plan phase these assumptions need to be evaluated and as appropriate adjustments made to accommodate the findings of direct discussions with the key stakeholders.

Finally, the upgraded market analysis and institutional assumptions will be used to develop a more detailed implementation plan, financial and funding plan, and economic cost benefit and impact plan. The financial and funding plan will develop the cash flows for the project, and the timing and sources of funds needed to complete the project.  The economic analysis will show the benefits to the communities in the Trade and Transport Corridor. The analysis will produce both the Cost Benefit Analysis required by USDOT, as well as the economic impact for the region associated with job creation, increased income, property development, and tax base enhancement.  This can be used to develop community outreach in communities along the corridor and at local and state level, to explain the costs and benefits of developing the corridor.

In undertaking this analysis TEMS will use its six step Business Planning process.  The process is shown in Exhibit 3.  For this Feasibility Study TEMS will refine the more aggregate level of analysis that was used for the preliminary study.  This will include updating the trade and traffic data that derives the forecasts, working to resolve institutional issues and ensuring the practicality of the proposed implementation process.

Exhibit 3

[s1a1201701_r1015.jpg]

ARMT

MOBILE TRADE                      (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.)AND TRANSPORT CORRIDOR: SCOPE OF WORK

1

Introduction

1

Introduction

The purpose of this Investment Grade study is to evaluate the potential for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, as an adjunct to Port Mobile to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between the Appalachians in the east, and the Mississippi in the west, and stretching as far north as the markets of mid-America including Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. The area is largely served today by West Coast Ports that rely on relatively expensive rail and truck shipments to these inland markets, but are low cost due to the large ships that can access West Coast Ports. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile corridor has the potential to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving these markets.  See Exhibits 1 and 2.

The reason for this is that the Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships (50 foot depth) that will be able to access the gulf and east coasts with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged, this will reduce the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from West Coast Ports to the Port of Mobile.

[s1a1201701_r1016.jpg]

Exhibit 1: Potential Port of Mobile Hinterland with Post-Panamax Max Ships

[s120161121r1009.jpg]

35

[s1a1201701_r1017.jpg]

Exhibit 2: 2: Mobile Trade (ATFI Alabama Toll RoadRoad Facility Inc.)& Transport Corridor: Population and Required Linkage

[s120161121r1010.jpg]


ARMT is proposing that new infrastructure be developed at the Port of Mobile, and for inland access to the markets that may be served by the Port of Mobile in the future. The new infrastructure will include a new toll highway, a freight rail line from the Port of Mobile to Inland Ports at key locations in the Trade and Transport Corridor, and a cargo airport to expand the capabilities of the corridor to include air freight similar to the airport in Alliance, Texas.

To assess the potential for the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, ARMT has asked Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) to prepare a scope of work that will provide the business case for the project. The project will answer the following questions

·

What is the business case for investing in rail along Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor?

·

How will the Port of Mobile and the communities along the Trade and Transport Corridor benefit?

·

Can the private sector play a role in developing the corridor, and what financial returns will be generated?

·

How can Port of Mobile support the development of Inland Ports in serving the hinterland and trade market?

·

What are the kinds and sources of private funding (revenue, loans, grants, bonds, letters of credit, etc.) that can be obtained to support and develop the project?


36



2

Study Approach

The purpose of the Business Plan study is to assess at an Investment Grade level of detail, the market opportunities, physical facility needs, financial and economic returns, business arrangements and implementation timeline for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor as a trade corridor for Port of Mobile between Port Mobile and inland markets.

In carrying out its initial review, TEMS has already shown there is a prima facia case for the investment.  However, the review was based on an analysis using existing data and models including the Panama Canal Route Choice model and the National Ports model.  Both models need updating to 2015 to reflect the post 2008 recession economy and the latest changes in the development of the Panama Canal, US Ports, and marine economics.

In addition, the preliminary study made a number of assumptions about the institutional structures that would be adopted by the Port and Railroads.  In the Business Plan phase these assumptions need to be evaluated and as appropriate adjustments made to accommodate the findings of direct discussions with the key stakeholders.

Finally, the upgraded market analysis and institutional assumptions will be used to develop a more detailed implementation plan, financial and funding plan, and economic cost benefit and impact plan. The financial and funding plan will develop the cash flows for the project, and the timing and sources of funds needed to complete the project.  The economic analysis will show the benefits to the communities in the Trade and Transport Corridor. The analysis will produce both the Cost Benefit Analysis required by USDOT, as well as the economic impact for the region associated with job creation, increased income, property development, and tax base enhancement.  This can be used to develop community outreach in communities along the corridor and at local and state level, to explain the costs and benefits of developing the corridor.

In undertaking this analysis TEMS will use its six step Business Planning process.  The process is shown in Exhibit 3.  For this Feasibility Study TEMS will refine the more aggregate level of analysis that was used for the preliminary study.  This will include updating the trade and traffic data that derives the forecasts, working to resolve institutional issues and ensuring the practicality of the proposed implementation process.

[s120161121r1011.jpg]


37



[s1a1201701_r1018.jpg]

The Company plans to take the following steps in implementing its business plan.

Step 1 Market Assessment

For the Business Plan analysis, TEMS will update the market data developed by TEMS for the Panama Canal, Gulf Coast Port Study, West Coast Port Study, and National Ports Model.  The data will be brought to a 2015 basis in order to identify the market potential for the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor. This will be done using the TEMS GOODS multimodal freight model.  The new database of socioeconomic data, marine markets, vessel economics, inland markets and competitive inland transport networks will be updated using the latest Port statistics, updated inland transportation data, and changes in mode competition due to oil prices, congestion and fuel efficiency.

The feasibility study will use the TEMS GOODS model framework (Exhibit 4), which is designed to analyze freight traffic flows at an International, Regional and Local level.

Exhibit 4: GOODS Model Structure

Exhibit 4: GOODS Model Structure




[s1a1201701_r1020.gif]

As can be seen in in Exhibit 4 Exhibit 4 above , the database includes not just O/D data, transport mode networks and socioeconomic data, but in addition stated preference data on shipper choices.  This data is critical in deciding how shippers select routes, modes, and carriers.  The current data was developed in 2006 for the Panama Canal and USDOT inland shipping studies.  This will be reviewed and updated to provide insight into six types of container traffic Raw Materials, Furniture, Food, Industrial Products, Finished Products, and Electronics/Computers.  Each type of container traffic will be modeled separately as each type of traffic has a different shipper response. See Exhibit 5.

[s120161121r1015.gif]

Exhibit 5: GOODS Model Commodities Categories


38[s1a1201701_r1022.gif]



The GOODS model allocates traffic to modes using a metric that reflects shipper and carrier behavior in the face of different mode and service options. A critical factor in the metric is Values of Time that are different by different commodities value added content (i.e., highest for electronics lowest for raw lowest materials). It provides a mechanism for estimating market share traffic volumes and revenue potential for each element of the traffic movement. Values of Time will be updated to 2015 values.

Forecasts will be prepared using both the economic growth forecasts and changes in transport infrastructure in the Port of Mobile and the other Gulf Ports, and the market shares of the Gulf versus both West and East coast ports.

The market analysis will be used to identify rail traffic from the Port of Mobile along the Trade and Transport Corridor for horizon years 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050.  The traffic analysis will be summarized in terms of short, medium and long term opportunities.

Step 2 Service Scenario Definition

In the second step, the Business Plan will seek to define in more detail than in the concept study the most appropriate form of port, rail, highway and air infrastructure and development strategies that might be developed for the Port of Mobile and the Trade and Transport Corridor.  Using specific market data on the potential market pairs, service needs, and the potential types of water, truck and rail operations in terms of performance and cost, an Interactive Analysis will be completed that assesses the relationship between market volumes, water, rail and truck service development options for the Port Freeport and Inland distribution networks. A key factor in this analysis will be the level of institutional cooperation that can be achieved between the communities along the route and transportation stakeholders. Specific discussions will be held with the freight railroads to identify mutually satisfactory solutions in the development of the corridor. From the evaluation of these options the analysis will identify the most effective traffic potential, intermodal interface needs, port to port services, and potential schedules and tariffs.



39



Exhibit 6 shows the Interactive Analysis process. It can be seen that data on the marine and inland transport distribution systems and on the market is required to identify the character of the transport operations that can be provided in the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor.  The analysis uses three TEMS programs: LOCOMOTION, SWITCH-IT and GOODS to evaluate the Trade-offs between alternatives.

Exhibit 6: Interactive Analysis Process

[s1a1201701_r1023.jpg]

Port and Infrastructure needs to service the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor will be identified and their operating and capital costs estimated in 2015 dollars.  The cost estimates generated in the concept study will be subject to detailed review in terms of both their engineering requirements, as well as potential environmental issues. An environmental scan will be completed to endure that environmental issues can be mitigated and that no fatal flaws exist in the development of the corridor.

The Engineering feasibility for the study will build on the earlier port and market studies and analysis and will create a representative alignment (highway, rail, airport), between Port of Mobile and its hinterland, solely for the purpose of assessing the feasibility of the project. Civil, structural and operational engineering requirements for construction of the highway and rail project, and likely related infrastructure costs, will be developed for the representative alignments. Roadway network improvements necessary due to the project will also be analyzed.  The overall analysis will include consideration of whether the project can be executed and operated safely, rail geometry issues, and the environmental feasibility of the project with a view towards the ability to secure the required licenses, approvals and permits in a timely and cost effective way.  

Furthermore, the timing of infrastructure needs will be assessed to ensure that it is timed to relate to changing traffic conditions, which could well occur in the next five to ten years due to the Panama Canal. The impact of the proposed improvements in Port Mobile services and the Trade and Transport Corridor for truck and rail will then be compared to other major Gulf ports and used in estimating the potential market that the Port can capture.

Development of a new rail line in the Trade and Transport Corridor as part of the national rail network will fall under the jurisdiction of the United States Surface Transportation Board (STB).  Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the STB must take into account the environmental impacts of its actions, including direct, indirect and



40



cumulative impacts.  The STB's environmental rules are specified in 49 CFR 1105. These rules implement various environmental statutes that include NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act.  STB requirements for environmental documentation and historic reports as detailed in the following link: http://www.stb.dot.gov/stb/environment/rules_guide.html.

The development of the toll road will come under direction of FHWA and Alabama State DOT and will need to meet their applicable regulatory standards.


As a feasibility-level assessment, the current study must complete an Environmental Scan that will anticipate and identify potential environmental issues. The environmental scan will include a preliminary consideration of at least the following areas:

o

Natural/Biological Resources

o

Water Resources/Wetlands

o

Land Use

o

GeologyAppalachian Regional Commission

The Company is working to develop a project to build a toll road in the State of Alabama, per Resolution SJR-56 by Legislature of State of Alabama and Soilsis in the process of raising funding. In 2010, the Company was developing this project at the time of the merger with Yellowwood. The planned toll road is designated as a 35 7 2 mile 4-lane road designed to be built from Orange Beach, Alabama to the Tennessee state line with the intent of connecting various rural sections of Alabama to Tennessee and more urban areas. The toll road that would connect various rural sections of Alabama to Tennessee and with its more urban areas.

o

RecreationAs its first step, Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (ATFI) was created and obtained status as a nonprofit corporation pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.  As a nonprofit corporation, ATFI is allowed to make bond offerings in order to finance the cost of acquisition and construction and equipping of the toll road project.  Mr. Shah Mathias (the founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company founder of the Company ) was one of the directors of ATFI and has subsequently resigned his position.

o

NoiseIn 2007, the toll road project was presented to the Alabama legislature which on June 7, 2007, adopted Act no. 2007-506 entitled "Expressing Support for the Alabama Toll Road Project".  This Act stated that it recognized the need to utilize other financial resources to meet the needs of that highways and Vibrationother infrastructure items such as that offered by ATFI. The Act urged approval of the bonds offered by ATFI as special revenue bonds with the project eventually vesting to the state upon retirement of the bonds.  The Act further supports designating ATFI as the exclusive entity for creation and development of the toll road project.

o

Cultural/Paleontological ResourcesAs a second step, on September 23, 2009, Penndel Land Company (Penndel), a company wholly owned by Shah Mathias entered into an agreement with ATFI by which Penndel was appointed as the agent and representative of ATFI to perform all required tasks and actions to develop and construct the toll road.  

o

Environmental JusticeThirdly, on December 1, 2010, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure, Inc. ("GTI") in the state of Delaware to provide development and construction services for the Alabama highway project and to include securing financing for the design, planning, engineering and related costs of construction.

In December 2010, Penndel assigned its agreements with ATFI to GTI. As such the Company, through its subsidiary, GTI, has the development rights for such toll road. Under the terms of the agreement, GTI will provide development and construction services. GTI will also act as an agent and representative to take actions necessary to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering and related soft and hard costs of the construction of a toll road in the state of Alabama and related activities.

An environmental constraints map will be createdAlabama Indenture Agreement

On December 1, 2010, ATFI entered into a Master Trust Indenture agreement with as HSRF Trustee, which has agreed to serve as the trustee for the bond offering of up to $7,000,000,000 of ATFI Revenue Bonds once it determines to effect such an offering if ever. The Alabama Indenture indicates that the developer for the project area that identifies the major environmental areas of concern.  This constraints map will be created using publicly available dataGTI.  In April 2012 the Alabama Indenture was amended to reflect a Master Indenture of $20,000,000,000.  The Master Agreement provides the basic terms and conditions of any bond issuance such as use of an escrow agent, rights of bond holders, sale of bonds, etc. At the time that any bonds are to be issued, the Company will engage an asset manager and trustee for the indenture.

Proposed Investment Grade Study

Alabama Trade and Transportation Corridor including Alabama Toll Road Facility

To assess this project, Ameri Metro will complete an Investment Grade Study of the corridors potential. The following proposal outlines the study that will be taken to evaluate the project.  This proposal is the standard format that Ameri Metro will use to assess Trade and Transportation Corridors.

1

Introduction

The purpose of this Investment Grade study is to evaluate the potential for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, as an adjunct to Port Mobile to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between the Appalachians in the east, and the study teams knowledgeMississippi in the west, and stretching as far north as the markets of the project area.mid-America including Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. The representative alignment will be laid out sucharea is largely served today by West Coast Ports that is does not have any fatal flaws duerely on relatively expensive rail and truck shipments to environmental impacts.  Lesser impactsthese inland markets, but are low cost due to the representative alignmentlarge ships that can access West Coast Ports. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile corridor has the potential to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving these markets.


The reason for this is that the Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships (50 foot depth) that will be used asable to access the basisgulf and east coasts with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged, this will reduce the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from West Coast Ports to the Port of Mobile.


               Exhibit 1: Potential Port of Mobile Hinterland with Post-Panamax Max Ships

[s1a1201701_r1013.jpg]

Exhibit 2: Mobile Trade (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.) & Transport Corridor: Population and Required Linkage

[s1a1201701_r1014.jpg] 

ARMT is proposing that new infrastructure be developed at the Port of Mobile, and for inland access to the markets that may be served by the Port of Mobile in the future. The new infrastructure will include a new toll highway, a freight rail line from the Port of Mobile to Inland Ports at key locations in the Trade and Transport Corridor, and a cargo airport to expand the capabilities of the corridor to include air freight similar to the airport in Alliance, Texas.

To assess the potential for the mitigation costs associated withMobile Trade and Transport Corridor, ARMT has asked Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) to prepare a scope of work that will provide the business case for the project. The project will answer the following questions

The Feasibility Study·

What is the business case for investing in rail along Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor?

·

How will not include public outreach other than with key Project stakeholders, but the feasibility study should reasonably anticipate likely community concerns.

Finally, the analysis will define the most effective way to develop both water services and inland distribution services, by assessing their performance in both financial and economic terms. Specifically, an analysis will be made of different water services to and between Mobile and other ports, and specifically the role of COB services. From the evaluation of options the most effective development plan for the Port of Mobile and the Trade and Transport Corridor will be derived. In developing the service plan, the analysis will also recognize and consider existing and potential institutional, fiscal, and policy issues that are fundamental to the success of the project.

A key element of the Business Plan assessment will be that the study teams work closely with important stakeholders such as the shippers to ensure they are comfortable with the basic concepts, market forecasts, and Port of Mobile service proposals. It is important to achieve buy-in from the freight shippers, railroads and carriers, and to identify their needs in meeting the Port of Mobile proposals. This includes competitive highway and rail service to and from the port, the character of water services from and to the Port of Mobile, and the line and yard capacity issues for rail, highway facilities and services, The rail capacity issues will be identified using the MISS-IT and SWITCH-IT models. As required, highway and rail infrastructure capacity needs and potential funding will be addressed. The service plan as finally developed will include contingencies to manage issues affecting its implementation.

Step 3 Traffic and Revenue Assessment

A traffic and revenue yield assessment will be completed to optimize the tariff systems for the final service plan for highway and rail. For each level of service, the market data and the service plan will be used to derive revenue estimates



41



that reflect the supply and demand conditions that will exist. By providing an analysis of tariffs tocommunities along the Trade and Transport Corridor benefit?

·

Can the private sector play a role in relationdeveloping the corridor, and what financial returns will be generated?

·

How can Port of Mobile support the development of Inland Ports in serving the hinterland and trade market?

·

What are the kinds and sources of private funding (revenue, loans, grants, bonds, letters of credit, etc.) that can be obtained to support and develop the supply and demand conditions (i.e., the affordabilityproject?

2

Study Approach

The purpose of the tariffBusiness Plan study is to truck companies and the freight railroads), a final setassess at an Investment Grade level of traffic volumes and revenues can be derived. These tariffs, when applied todetail, the market will optimize revenuesopportunities, physical facility needs, financial and provideeconomic returns, business arrangements and implementation timeline for developing the key input to the financial model used to assess the potential of the Corridor. The proposed tariffs will be discussed with the trucking companies and freight railroads to identify the value they place on the improvements offered by theMobile Trade and Transport Corridor.Corridor as a trade corridor for Port of Mobile between Port Mobile and inland markets.

Step 4 Implementation Plan AnalysisIn carrying out its initial review, TEMS has already shown there is a prima facia case for the investment.  However, the review was based on an analysis using existing data and models including the Panama Canal Route Choice model and the National Ports model.  Both models need updating to 2015 to reflect the post 2008 recession economy and the latest changes in the development of the Panama Canal, US Ports, and marine economics.

In addition, the preliminary study made a number of assumptions about the institutional structures that would be adopted by the Port and Railroads.  In the fourth step,Business Plan phase these assumptions need to be evaluated and as appropriate adjustments made to accommodate the findings of direct discussions with the key stakeholders.

Finally, the upgraded market analysis service plan and tariff structures developed in Steps 1 through 3institutional assumptions will be used to definedevelop a more detailed implementation plan, financial and funding plan, and economic cost benefit and impact plan. The financial and funding plan will develop the specific infrastructure, land uses,cash flows for the project, and development proposals forthe timing and sources of funds needed to complete the project.  The economic analysis will show the benefits to the communities in the Trade and Transport Corridor. The analysis will identifyproduce both the Cost Benefit Analysis required by USDOT, as well as the economic impact for the region associated with job creation, increased income, property development, and tax base enhancement.  This can be used to develop community outreach in communities along the corridor and at local and state level, to explain the costs and benefits of developing the corridor.

In undertaking this analysis TEMS will use its six step Business Planning process.  The process is shown in Exhibit 3.  For this Feasibility Study TEMS will refine the more aggregate level of analysis that was used for the preliminary study.  This will include updating the trade and traffic data that derives the forecasts, working to resolve institutional issues and ensuring the practicality of the proposed implementation process.

Exhibit 3

[s1a1201701_r1015.jpg]

ARMT

MOBILE TRADE                      (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.)AND TRANSPORT CORRIDOR: SCOPE OF WORK


1

Introduction

The purpose of this Investment Grade study is to evaluate the potential for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, as an adjunct to Port Mobile to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between the Appalachians in the east, and the Mississippi in the west, and stretching as far north as the markets of mid-America including Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. The area is largely served today by West Coast Ports that rely on relatively expensive rail and truck shipments to these critical inputs/inland markets, but are low cost due to the large ships that can access West Coast Ports. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile corridor has the potential to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving these markets.  See Exhibits 1 and 2.

The reason for this is that the Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships (50 foot depth) that will be able to access the gulf and east coasts with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged, this will reduce the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from West Coast Ports to the Port of Mobile.

[s1a1201701_r1016.jpg]

Exhibit 1: Potential Port of Mobile Hinterland with Post-Panamax Max Ships



[s1a1201701_r1017.jpg]

Exhibit 2: Mobile Trade(ATFI Alabama TollRoad Facility Inc.)& Transport Corridor: Population and Required Linkage

ARMT is proposing that new infrastructure be developed at the Port of Mobile, and for inland access to the markets that may be served by the Port of Mobile in the future. The new infrastructure will include a new toll highway, a freight rail line from the Port of Mobile to Inland Ports at key locations in the Trade and Transport Corridor, and a cargo airport to expand the capabilities of the corridor to include air freight similar to the airport in Alliance, Texas.

To assess the potential for the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, ARMT has asked Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) to prepare a scope of work that will provide the business case for the project. The project will answer the following questions

·

Port infrastructure,What is the business case for investing in rail along Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor?

·

Rail infrastructure,How will the Port of Mobile and the communities along the Trade and Transport Corridor benefit?

·

Airport facilities,Can the private sector play a role in developing the corridor, and what financial returns will be generated?

·

Highway infrastructure,How can Port of Mobile support the development of Inland Ports in serving the hinterland and trade market?

·

Inland port potential,What are the kinds and sources of private funding (revenue, loans, grants, bonds, letters of credit, etc.) that can be obtained to support and develop the project?

·

Terminal facilities,

·

2

Bulk and car load rail traffic,Study Approach

·

Maintenance facilities,

·

Interface access systems for truck and rail traffic,

AThe purpose of the Business Plan study is to assess at an Investment Grade level of detail, the market opportunities, physical facility needs, financial and economic evaluation processreturns, business arrangements and implementation timeline for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor as a trade corridor for Port of Mobile between Port Mobile and inland markets.

In carrying out its initial review, TEMS has already shown there is a prima facia case for the investment.  However, the review was based on an analysis using existing data and models including the Panama Canal Route Choice model and the National Ports model.  Both models need updating to 2015 to reflect the post 2008 recession economy and the latest changes in the development of the Panama Canal, US Ports, and marine economics.

In addition, the preliminary study made a number of assumptions about the institutional structures that would be adopted by the Port and Railroads.  In the Business Plan phase these assumptions need to be evaluated and as appropriate adjustments made to accommodate the findings of direct discussions with the key stakeholders.

Finally, the upgraded market analysis and institutional assumptions will assessbe used to develop a more detailed implementation plan, financial returnand funding plan, and economic benefits.cost benefit and impact plan. The financial and funding plan will develop the cash flows for the project, and the timing and sources of funds needed to complete the project.  The economic analysis will assess highway, truckshow the benefits to the communities in the Trade and auto tolls,Transport Corridor. The analysis will produce both the Cost Benefit Analysis required by USDOT, as well as the economic impact for the region associated with job creation, increased income, property development, and freight railroad containertax base enhancement.  This can be used to develop community outreach in communities along the corridor and car load trafficat local and provide an assessmentstate level, to explain the costs and benefits of needed facilities. These assessmentsdeveloping the corridor.

In undertaking this analysis TEMS will use its six step Business Planning process.  The process is shown in Exhibit 3.  For this Feasibility Study TEMS will refine the more aggregate level of analysis that was used for the preliminary study.  This will include net presentupdating the trade and traffic data that derives the forecasts, working to resolve institutional issues and ensuring the practicality of the proposed implementation process.



[s1a1201701_r1018.jpg]

The Company plans to take the following steps in implementing its business plan.

Step 1 Market Assessment

For the Business Plan analysis, TEMS will update the market data developed by TEMS for the Panama Canal, Gulf Coast Port Study, West Coast Port Study, and National Ports Model.  The data will be brought to a 2015 basis in order to identify the market potential for the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor. This will be done using the TEMS GOODS multimodal freight model.  The new database of socioeconomic data, marine markets, vessel economics, inland markets and competitive inland transport networks will be updated using the latest Port statistics, updated inland transportation data, and changes in mode competition due to oil prices, congestion and fuel efficiency.

The feasibility study will use the TEMS GOODS model framework (Exhibit 4), which is designed to analyze freight traffic flows at an International, Regional and Local level.

Exhibit 4: GOODS Model Structure

Exhibit 4: GOODS Model Structure




[s1a1201701_r1020.gif]

As can be seen in in Exhibit 4 Exhibit 4 above , the database includes not just O/D data, transport mode networks and socioeconomic data, but in addition stated preference data on shipper choices.  This data is critical in deciding how shippers select routes, modes, and carriers.  The current data was developed in 2006 for the Panama Canal and USDOT inland shipping studies.  This will be reviewed and updated to provide insight into six types of container traffic Raw Materials, Furniture, Food, Industrial Products, Finished Products, and Electronics/Computers.  Each type of container traffic will be modeled separately as each type of traffic has a different shipper response. See Exhibit 5.

Exhibit 5: GOODS Model Commodities Categories


[s1a1201701_r1022.gif]

The GOODS model allocates traffic to modes using a metric that reflects shipper and carrier behavior in the face of different mode and service options. A critical factor in the metric is Values of Time that are different by different commodities value internal rateadded content (i.e., highest for electronics lowest for raw lowest materials). It provides a mechanism for estimating market share traffic volumes and revenue potential for each element of return, payback period, debt coveragethe traffic movement. Values of Time will be updated to 2015 values.

Forecasts will be prepared using both the economic growth forecasts and financial risk.  A quantitative risk analysis riskchanges in transport infrastructure in the Port of Mobile and the other Gulf Ports, and the market shares of the Gulf versus both West and East coast ports.

The market analysis will be used to identify key elementsrail traffic from the Port of Mobile along the Trade and Transport Corridor for horizon years 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050.  The traffic analysis will be summarized in terms of short, medium and long term opportunities.

Step 2 Service Scenario Definition

In the second step, the Business Plan will seek to define in more detail than in the concept study the most appropriate form of port, rail, highway and air infrastructure and development strategies that could impact the financial return on the project. As the process develops, specific requirements willmight be developed for the Port of Mobile and the Trade and Transport CorridorCorridor.  Using specific market data on the potential market pairs, service needs, and the revenue processpotential types of water, truck and rail operations in terms of performance and cost, an Interactive Analysis will be examinedcompleted that assesses the relationship between market volumes, water, rail and truck service development options for the Port Freeport and Inland distribution networks. A key factor in this analysis will be the level of institutional cooperation that can be achieved between the communities along the route and transportation stakeholders. Specific discussions will be held with the freight railroads to maximizeidentify mutually satisfactory solutions in the financial and economic successdevelopment of the project.corridor. From the evaluation of these options the analysis will identify the most effective traffic potential, intermodal interface needs, port to port services, and potential schedules and tariffs.

InExhibit 6 shows the economicInteractive Analysis process. It can be seen that data on the marine and inland transport distribution systems and on the market is required to identify the character of the transport operations that can be provided in the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor.  The analysis an evaluationuses three TEMS programs: LOCOMOTION, SWITCH-IT and GOODS to evaluate the Trade-offs between alternatives.

Exhibit 6: Interactive Analysis Process

[s1a1201701_r1023.jpg]

Port and Infrastructure needs to service the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor will be madeidentified and their operating and capital costs estimated in 2015 dollars.  The cost estimates generated in the Cost Benefit returnsconcept study will be subject to detailed review in terms of both their engineering requirements, as well as potential environmental issues. An environmental scan will be completed to endure that environmental issues can be mitigated and that no fatal flaws exist in the development of the corridor.

The Engineering feasibility for the study will build on the earlier port and market studies and analysis and will create a representative alignment (highway, rail, airport), between Port of Mobile and its hinterland, solely for the purpose of assessing the feasibility of the project. Civil, structural and operational engineering requirements for construction of the highway and rail project, and likely related infrastructure costs, will be developed for the representative alignments. Roadway network improvements necessary due to the project will also be analyzed.  The overall analysis will include consideration of whether the project can be executed and operated safely, rail geometry issues, and the environmental feasibility of the project with a view towards the ability to secure the required licenses, approvals and permits in a timely and cost effective way.  

Furthermore, the timing of infrastructure needs will be assessed to ensure that it is timed to relate to changing traffic conditions, which could well occur in the next five to ten years due to the public, ports, highway operations, and freight railroads. This will be supplemented by a RENTS analysisPanama Canal. The impact of the jobs, income, property values,proposed improvements in Port Mobile services and tax base enhancement that would result from the project.

At the end of Step 4, the preliminary Implementation Plan will be developed, defining the milestones and components for implementing the Trade and Transport Corridor infrastructure.for truck and rail will then be compared to other major Gulf ports and used in estimating the potential market that the Port can capture.

Step 5 Financing and Funding Plan

In Step 5,Development of a new rail line in the aim will be to develop a full financing framework and funding plan for the project will be defined to include potential public-private partnerships, franchise potentials and others. The role of funding sources in terms of both the public and private sector will be assessed and a variety of creative financing and funding programs will be considered. Specific consideration will be given to the appropriate institutional structures for the operation and the needs of stakeholders. As required, specific cost sharing arrangements will be developed between federal, state, ports, shippers and the freight railroads. As appropriate, cost-sharing arrangements will be thoroughly defined and various cost allocation, procedures proposed.

During this step, Institutional arrangements agreements will be discussed, developed, and delivered to the partners for their acceptance. A Risk Analysis will identify key factors and issues associated with the different strategic options.




42



Step 6 Business Plan

In Step 6, a Feasibility Business Plan will be finalized that will bring together the various sub-plans and agreements that have been developed as part of Steps 1 through 5. The Feasibility Business Plan will include

·

Market Analysis

·

Operating and Service Plans

·

Capital and Operating Costs

·

Environmental Requirements

·

Land use Requirements

·

Financial Plan

·

Funding Plan

·

Implementation plan


The Business Plan will guide and support the key stakeholders throughout the implementation and financing activities of the incremental rail project. Capital needs, operating costs and potential revenues will be identified. This plan will set out a development proposals and investment program to support as necessary the provisions of updated Port of Mobile infrastructure, Trade and Transport Corridor rail, highway, air infrastructure, a full multimodal Inland Port facility to facilitate traffic movement by truck, rail, air, and water out of and into the Port of Mobile hinterland. This development will require full financial and economic justification and an understandingas part of the contributionnational rail network will fall under the facility can make tojurisdiction of the Texas economyUnited States Surface Transportation Board (STB).  Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the STB must take into account the environmental impacts of its actions, including direct, indirect and cumulative impacts.  The STB's environmental rules are specified in terms49 CFR 1105. These rules implement various environmental statutes that include NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act.  STB requirements for environmental documentation and historic reports as detailed in the following link: http://www.stb.dot.gov/stb/environment/rules_guide.html.

The development of jobs, incomethe toll road will come under direction of FHWA and transfer payments like tax base expansion and additional rents and fees.

3

Resources

Time Line: The work will take nine months to complete,Alabama State DOT and will involve eight meetings and presentations as shown in Exhibit 1, asneed to meet their applicable regulatory standards.


As a feasibility-level assessment, the current study proceeds. It is proposed that the Appalachian Regional Council (ARC) will set up a study advisory teammust complete an Environmental Scan that will meet withanticipate and identify potential environmental issues. The environmental scan will include a preliminary consideration of at least the study team at four workshops, where TEMS will present the work of the project and discuss key assumptions, issues, and input scenarios and strategies with the study team.following areas:

Study Cost: The study will cost $500,000 to complete including out of pocket travel costs.  Out of pocket travel costs will be billed as a direct expense.o

4Natural/Biological Resources

Work Plano

Water Resources/Wetlands

Mobile Trade (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.) and Transport Corridor Work PlanLand Use


o

[s120161121r1017.jpg]

43



Mobile (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.) Intermodal Corridor, Research Review Team

Team Member

Affiliation

·

Dr. Mark Burton, PhD      

University of Tennessee

·

Dr. David Clarke, PhD

University of Tennessee

·

Mr. Rick Tucker

Port of Huntsville, AL

·

Mr. Jimmy Lyons

Port of Mobile, AL

·

Dr. Craig Phillip, PhD

Vanderbilt University

·

Dr. Ted Grossardt, PhD

University of Kentucky

·

Mr. Kent Sowards

Marshall University

·

Dr. Mike Hicks, PhD

Ball State University

·

Mr. Scott Hercik

Appalachian Regional Commission

The Company is working to develop a project to build a toll road in the State of Alabama, per Resolution SJR-56 by Legislature of State of Alabama and is in the process of raising funding. In 2010, the Company was developing this project at the time of the merger with Yellowwood. The planned toll road is designated as a 35 7 2 mile 4-lane road designed to be built from Orange Beach, Alabama to the Tennessee state line with the intent of connecting various rural sections of Alabama to Tennessee and more urban areas. The toll road that would connect various rural sections of Alabama to Tennessee and with its more urban areas.


As its first step, Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (ATFI) was created and obtained status as a nonprofit corporation pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.  As a nonprofit corporation, ATFI is allowed to make bond offerings in order to finance the cost of acquisition and construction and equipping of the toll road project.  Mr. Shah Mathias (the founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company founder of the Company ) was one of the directors of ATFI and has subsequently resigned his position.


In 2007, the toll road project was presented to the Alabama legislature which on June 7, 2007, adopted Act no. 2007-506 entitled "Expressing Support for the Alabama Toll Road Project".  This Act stated that it recognized the need to utilize other financial resources to meet the needs of that highways and other infrastructure items such as that offered by ATFI. The Act urged approval of the bonds offered by ATFI as special revenue bonds with the project eventually vesting to the state upon retirement of the bonds.  The Act further supports designating ATFI as the exclusive entity for creation and development of the toll road project.


As a second step, on September 23, 2009, Penndel Land Company (Penndel), a company wholly owned by Shah Mathias entered into an agreement with ATFI by which Penndel was appointed as the agent and representative of ATFI to perform all required tasks and actions to develop and construct the toll road.  


Thirdly, on December 1, 2010, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure, Inc. ("GTI") in the state of Delaware to provide development and construction services for the Alabama highway project and to include securing financing for the design, planning, engineering and related costs of construction.

In December 2010, Penndel assigned its agreements with ATFI to GTI. As such the Company, through its subsidiary, GTI, has the development rights for such toll road. Under the terms of the agreement, GTI will provide development and construction services. GTI will also act as an agent and representative to take actions necessary to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering and related soft and hard costs of the construction of a toll road in the state of Alabama and related activities.

Alabama Indenture Agreement

On December 1, 2010, ATFI entered into a Master Trust Indenture agreement with as HSRF Trustee, which has agreed to serve as the trustee for the bond offering of up to $7,000,000,000 of ATFI Revenue Bonds once it determines to effect such an offering if ever. The Alabama Indenture indicates that the developer for the project will be GTI.  In April 2012 the Alabama Indenture was amended to reflect a Master Indenture of $20,000,000,000.  The Master Agreement provides the basic terms and conditions of any bond issuance such as use of an escrow agent, rights of bond holders, sale of bonds, etc. At the time that any bonds are to be issued, the Company will engage an asset manager and trustee for the indenture.

Proposed Investment Grade Study

Alabama Trade and Transportation Corridor including Alabama Toll Road Facility

To assess this project, Ameri Metro will complete an Investment Grade Study of the corridors potential. The following proposal outlines the study that will be taken to evaluate the project.  This proposal is the standard format that Ameri Metro will use to assess Trade and Transportation Corridors.

1

Introduction

The purpose of this Investment Grade study is to evaluate the potential for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, as an adjunct to Port Mobile to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between the Appalachians in the east, and the Mississippi in the west, and stretching as far north as the markets of mid-America including Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. The area is largely served today by West Coast Ports that rely on relatively expensive rail and truck shipments to these inland markets, but are low cost due to the large ships that can access West Coast Ports. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile corridor has the potential to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving these markets.


The reason for this is that the Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships (50 foot depth) that will be able to access the gulf and east coasts with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged, this will reduce the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from West Coast Ports to the Port of Mobile.


               Exhibit 1: Potential Port of Mobile Hinterland with Post-Panamax Max Ships

[s1a1201701_r1013.jpg]

Exhibit 2: Mobile Trade (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.) & Transport Corridor: Population and Required Linkage

[s1a1201701_r1014.jpg] 

ARMT is proposing that new infrastructure be developed at the Port of Mobile, and for inland access to the markets that may be served by the Port of Mobile in the future. The new infrastructure will include a new toll highway, a freight rail line from the Port of Mobile to Inland Ports at key locations in the Trade and Transport Corridor, and a cargo airport to expand the capabilities of the corridor to include air freight similar to the airport in Alliance, Texas.

To assess the potential for the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, ARMT has asked Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) to prepare a scope of work that will provide the business case for the project. The project will answer the following questions

·

What is the business case for investing in rail along Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor?

·

How will the Port of Mobile and the communities along the Trade and Transport Corridor benefit?

·

Can the private sector play a role in developing the corridor, and what financial returns will be generated?

·

How can Port of Mobile support the development of Inland Ports in serving the hinterland and trade market?

·

What are the kinds and sources of private funding (revenue, loans, grants, bonds, letters of credit, etc.) that can be obtained to support and develop the project?

2

Study Approach

The purpose of the Business Plan study is to assess at an Investment Grade level of detail, the market opportunities, physical facility needs, financial and economic returns, business arrangements and implementation timeline for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor as a trade corridor for Port of Mobile between Port Mobile and inland markets.

In carrying out its initial review, TEMS has already shown there is a prima facia case for the investment.  However, the review was based on an analysis using existing data and models including the Panama Canal Route Choice model and the National Ports model.  Both models need updating to 2015 to reflect the post 2008 recession economy and the latest changes in the development of the Panama Canal, US Ports, and marine economics.

In addition, the preliminary study made a number of assumptions about the institutional structures that would be adopted by the Port and Railroads.  In the Business Plan phase these assumptions need to be evaluated and as appropriate adjustments made to accommodate the findings of direct discussions with the key stakeholders.

Finally, the upgraded market analysis and institutional assumptions will be used to develop a more detailed implementation plan, financial and funding plan, and economic cost benefit and impact plan. The financial and funding plan will develop the cash flows for the project, and the timing and sources of funds needed to complete the project.  The economic analysis will show the benefits to the communities in the Trade and Transport Corridor. The analysis will produce both the Cost Benefit Analysis required by USDOT, as well as the economic impact for the region associated with job creation, increased income, property development, and tax base enhancement.  This can be used to develop community outreach in communities along the corridor and at local and state level, to explain the costs and benefits of developing the corridor.

In undertaking this analysis TEMS will use its six step Business Planning process.  The process is shown in Exhibit 3.  For this Feasibility Study TEMS will refine the more aggregate level of analysis that was used for the preliminary study.  This will include updating the trade and traffic data that derives the forecasts, working to resolve institutional issues and ensuring the practicality of the proposed implementation process.

Exhibit 3

[s1a1201701_r1015.jpg]

ARMT

MOBILE TRADE                      (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.)AND TRANSPORT CORRIDOR: SCOPE OF WORK


1

Introduction

The purpose of this Investment Grade study is to evaluate the potential for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, as an adjunct to Port Mobile to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between the Appalachians in the east, and the Mississippi in the west, and stretching as far north as the markets of mid-America including Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. The area is largely served today by West Coast Ports that rely on relatively expensive rail and truck shipments to these inland markets, but are low cost due to the large ships that can access West Coast Ports. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile corridor has the potential to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving these markets.  See Exhibits 1 and 2.

The reason for this is that the Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships (50 foot depth) that will be able to access the gulf and east coasts with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged, this will reduce the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from West Coast Ports to the Port of Mobile.

[s1a1201701_r1016.jpg]

Exhibit 1: Potential Port of Mobile Hinterland with Post-Panamax Max Ships



[s1a1201701_r1017.jpg]

Exhibit 2: Mobile Trade(ATFI Alabama TollRoad Facility Inc.)& Transport Corridor: Population and Required Linkage

ARMT is proposing that new infrastructure be developed at the Port of Mobile, and for inland access to the markets that may be served by the Port of Mobile in the future. The new infrastructure will include a new toll highway, a freight rail line from the Port of Mobile to Inland Ports at key locations in the Trade and Transport Corridor, and a cargo airport to expand the capabilities of the corridor to include air freight similar to the airport in Alliance, Texas.

To assess the potential for the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, ARMT has asked Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS) to prepare a scope of work that will provide the business case for the project. The project will answer the following questions

·

What is the business case for investing in rail along Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor?

·

How will the Port of Mobile and the communities along the Trade and Transport Corridor benefit?

·

Can the private sector play a role in developing the corridor, and what financial returns will be generated?

·

How can Port of Mobile support the development of Inland Ports in serving the hinterland and trade market?

·

What are the kinds and sources of private funding (revenue, loans, grants, bonds, letters of credit, etc.) that can be obtained to support and develop the project?



2

Study Approach

The purpose of the Business Plan study is to assess at an Investment Grade level of detail, the market opportunities, physical facility needs, financial and economic returns, business arrangements and implementation timeline for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor as a trade corridor for Port of Mobile between Port Mobile and inland markets.

In carrying out its initial review, TEMS has already shown there is a prima facia case for the investment.  However, the review was based on an analysis using existing data and models including the Panama Canal Route Choice model and the National Ports model.  Both models need updating to 2015 to reflect the post 2008 recession economy and the latest changes in the development of the Panama Canal, US Ports, and marine economics.

In addition, the preliminary study made a number of assumptions about the institutional structures that would be adopted by the Port and Railroads.  In the Business Plan phase these assumptions need to be evaluated and as appropriate adjustments made to accommodate the findings of direct discussions with the key stakeholders.

Finally, the upgraded market analysis and institutional assumptions will be used to develop a more detailed implementation plan, financial and funding plan, and economic cost benefit and impact plan. The financial and funding plan will develop the cash flows for the project, and the timing and sources of funds needed to complete the project.  The economic analysis will show the benefits to the communities in the Trade and Transport Corridor. The analysis will produce both the Cost Benefit Analysis required by USDOT, as well as the economic impact for the region associated with job creation, increased income, property development, and tax base enhancement.  This can be used to develop community outreach in communities along the corridor and at local and state level, to explain the costs and benefits of developing the corridor.

In undertaking this analysis TEMS will use its six step Business Planning process.  The process is shown in Exhibit 3.  For this Feasibility Study TEMS will refine the more aggregate level of analysis that was used for the preliminary study.  This will include updating the trade and traffic data that derives the forecasts, working to resolve institutional issues and ensuring the practicality of the proposed implementation process.



[s1a1201701_r1018.jpg]

The Company plans to take the following steps in implementing its business plan.

Step 1 Market Assessment

For the Business Plan analysis, TEMS will update the market data developed by TEMS for the Panama Canal, Gulf Coast Port Study, West Coast Port Study, and National Ports Model.  The data will be brought to a 2015 basis in order to identify the market potential for the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor. This will be done using the TEMS GOODS multimodal freight model.  The new database of socioeconomic data, marine markets, vessel economics, inland markets and competitive inland transport networks will be updated using the latest Port statistics, updated inland transportation data, and changes in mode competition due to oil prices, congestion and fuel efficiency.

The feasibility study will use the TEMS GOODS model framework (Exhibit 4), which is designed to analyze freight traffic flows at an International, Regional and Local level.

Exhibit 4: GOODS Model Structure

Exhibit 4: GOODS Model Structure




[s1a1201701_r1020.gif]

As can be seen in in Exhibit 4 Exhibit 4 above , the database includes not just O/D data, transport mode networks and socioeconomic data, but in addition stated preference data on shipper choices.  This data is critical in deciding how shippers select routes, modes, and carriers.  The current data was developed in 2006 for the Panama Canal and USDOT inland shipping studies.  This will be reviewed and updated to provide insight into six types of container traffic Raw Materials, Furniture, Food, Industrial Products, Finished Products, and Electronics/Computers.  Each type of container traffic will be modeled separately as each type of traffic has a different shipper response. See Exhibit 5.

Exhibit 5: GOODS Model Commodities Categories


[s1a1201701_r1022.gif]

The GOODS model allocates traffic to modes using a metric that reflects shipper and carrier behavior in the face of different mode and service options. A critical factor in the metric is Values of Time that are different by different commodities value added content (i.e., highest for electronics lowest for raw lowest materials). It provides a mechanism for estimating market share traffic volumes and revenue potential for each element of the traffic movement. Values of Time will be updated to 2015 values.

Forecasts will be prepared using both the economic growth forecasts and changes in transport infrastructure in the Port of Mobile and the other Gulf Ports, and the market shares of the Gulf versus both West and East coast ports.

The market analysis will be used to identify rail traffic from the Port of Mobile along the Trade and Transport Corridor for horizon years 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050.  The traffic analysis will be summarized in terms of short, medium and long term opportunities.

Step 2 Service Scenario Definition

In the second step, the Business Plan will seek to define in more detail than in the concept study the most appropriate form of port, rail, highway and air infrastructure and development strategies that might be developed for the Port of Mobile and the Trade and Transport Corridor.  Using specific market data on the potential market pairs, service needs, and the potential types of water, truck and rail operations in terms of performance and cost, an Interactive Analysis will be completed that assesses the relationship between market volumes, water, rail and truck service development options for the Port Freeport and Inland distribution networks. A key factor in this analysis will be the level of institutional cooperation that can be achieved between the communities along the route and transportation stakeholders. Specific discussions will be held with the freight railroads to identify mutually satisfactory solutions in the development of the corridor. From the evaluation of these options the analysis will identify the most effective traffic potential, intermodal interface needs, port to port services, and potential schedules and tariffs.

Exhibit 6 shows the Interactive Analysis process. It can be seen that data on the marine and inland transport distribution systems and on the market is required to identify the character of the transport operations that can be provided in the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor.  The analysis uses three TEMS programs: LOCOMOTION, SWITCH-IT and GOODS to evaluate the Trade-offs between alternatives.

Exhibit 6: Interactive Analysis Process

[s1a1201701_r1023.jpg]

Port and Infrastructure needs to service the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor will be identified and their operating and capital costs estimated in 2015 dollars.  The cost estimates generated in the concept study will be subject to detailed review in terms of both their engineering requirements, as well as potential environmental issues. An environmental scan will be completed to endure that environmental issues can be mitigated and that no fatal flaws exist in the development of the corridor.

The Engineering feasibility for the study will build on the earlier port and market studies and analysis and will create a representative alignment (highway, rail, airport), between Port of Mobile and its hinterland, solely for the purpose of assessing the feasibility of the project. Civil, structural and operational engineering requirements for construction of the highway and rail project, and likely related infrastructure costs, will be developed for the representative alignments. Roadway network improvements necessary due to the project will also be analyzed.  The overall analysis will include consideration of whether the project can be executed and operated safely, rail geometry issues, and the environmental feasibility of the project with a view towards the ability to secure the required licenses, approvals and permits in a timely and cost effective way.  

Furthermore, the timing of infrastructure needs will be assessed to ensure that it is timed to relate to changing traffic conditions, which could well occur in the next five to ten years due to the Panama Canal. The impact of the proposed improvements in Port Mobile services and the Trade and Transport Corridor for truck and rail will then be compared to other major Gulf ports and used in estimating the potential market that the Port can capture.

Development of a new rail line in the Trade and Transport Corridor as part of the national rail network will fall under the jurisdiction of the United States Surface Transportation Board (STB).  Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the STB must take into account the environmental impacts of its actions, including direct, indirect and cumulative impacts.  The STB's environmental rules are specified in 49 CFR 1105. These rules implement various environmental statutes that include NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act.  STB requirements for environmental documentation and historic reports as detailed in the following link: http://www.stb.dot.gov/stb/environment/rules_guide.html.

The development of the toll road will come under direction of FHWA and Alabama State DOT and will need to meet their applicable regulatory standards.


As a feasibility-level assessment, the current study must complete an Environmental Scan that will anticipate and identify potential environmental issues. The environmental scan will include a preliminary consideration of at least the following areas:

o

Natural/Biological Resources

o

Water Resources/Wetlands

Land Use

o

Geology and Soils

o

Recreation

o

Noise and Vibration

o

Cultural/Paleontological Resources

o

Environmental Justice

An environmental constraints map will be created for the project area that identifies the major environmental areas of concern.  This constraints map will be created using publicly available data and the study teams knowledge of the project area.  The representative alignment will be laid out such that is does not have any fatal flaws due to environmental impacts.  Lesser impacts due to the representative alignment will be used as the basis for the mitigation costs associated with the project.

The Feasibility Study will not include public outreach other than with key Project stakeholders, but the feasibility study should reasonably anticipate likely community concerns.

Finally, the analysis will define the most effective way to develop both water services and inland distribution services, by assessing their performance in both financial and economic terms. Specifically, an analysis will be made of different water services to and between Mobile and other ports, and specifically the role of COB services. From the evaluation of options the most effective development plan for the Port of Mobile and the Trade and Transport Corridor will be derived. In developing the service plan, the analysis will also recognize and consider existing and potential institutional, fiscal, and policy issues that are fundamental to the success of the project.

A key element of the Business Plan assessment will be that the study teams work closely with important stakeholders such as the shippers to ensure they are comfortable with the basic concepts, market forecasts, and Port of Mobile service proposals. It is important to achieve buy-in from the freight shippers, railroads and carriers, and to identify their needs in meeting the Port of Mobile proposals. This includes competitive highway and rail service to and from the port, the character of water services from and to the Port of Mobile, and the line and yard capacity issues for rail, highway facilities and services, The rail capacity issues will be identified using the MISS-IT and SWITCH-IT models. As required, highway and rail infrastructure capacity needs and potential funding will be addressed. The service plan as finally developed will include contingencies to manage issues affecting its implementation.

Step 3 Traffic and Revenue Assessment

A traffic and revenue yield assessment will be completed to optimize the tariff systems for the final service plan for highway and rail. For each level of service, the market data and the service plan will be used to derive revenue estimates that reflect the supply and demand conditions that will exist. By providing an analysis of tariffs to the Trade and Transport Corridor in relation to the supply and demand conditions (i.e., the affordability of the tariff to truck companies and the freight railroads), a final set of traffic volumes and revenues can be derived. These tariffs, when applied to the market, will optimize revenues and provide the key input to the financial model used to assess the potential of the Corridor. The proposed tariffs will be discussed with the trucking companies and freight railroads to identify the value they place on the improvements offered by the Trade and Transport Corridor.

Step 4 Implementation Plan Analysis

In the fourth step, the market analysis, service plan and tariff structures developed in Steps 1 through 3 will be used to define the specific infrastructure, land uses, and development proposals for the Trade and Transport Corridor. The analysis will identify these critical inputs/costs

·

Port infrastructure,

·

Rail infrastructure,

·

Airport facilities,

·

Highway infrastructure,

·

Inland port potential,

·

Terminal facilities,

·

Bulk and car load rail traffic,

·    Maintenance facilities,

·

Interface access systems for truck and rail traffic,

A financial and economic evaluation process will assess financial return and economic benefits. The financial analysis will assess highway, truck and auto tolls, and freight railroad container and car load traffic and provide an assessment of needed facilities. These assessments will include net present value, internal rate of return, payback period, debt coverage and financial risk.  A quantitative risk analysis risk analysis will identify key elements that could impact the financial return on the project. As the process develops, specific requirements will be developed for the Port of Mobile and the Trade and Transport Corridor and the revenue process will be examined to maximize the financial and economic success of the project.

In the economic analysis an evaluation will be made in the Cost Benefit returns of the project to the public, ports, highway operations, and freight railroads. This will be supplemented by a RENTS analysis of the jobs, income, property values, and tax base enhancement that would result from the project.

At the end of Step 4, the preliminary Implementation Plan will be developed, defining the milestones and components for implementing the Trade and Transport Corridor infrastructure.

Step 5 Financing and Funding Plan

In Step 5, the aim will be to develop a full financing framework and funding plan for the project will be defined to include potential public-private partnerships, franchise potentials and others. The role of funding sources in terms of both the public and private sector will be assessed and a variety of creative financing and funding programs will be considered. Specific consideration will be given to the appropriate institutional structures for the operation and the needs of stakeholders. As required, specific cost sharing arrangements will be developed between federal, state, ports, shippers and the freight railroads. As appropriate, cost-sharing arrangements will be thoroughly defined and various cost allocation, procedures proposed.

During this step, Institutional arrangements agreements will be discussed, developed, and delivered to the partners for their acceptance. A Risk Analysis will identify key factors and issues associated with the different strategic options.

Step 6 Business Plan

In Step 6, a Feasibility Business Plan will be finalized that will bring together the various sub-plans and agreements that have been developed as part of Steps 1 through 5. The Feasibility Business Plan will include

·

Market Analysis

·

Operating and Service Plans

·

Capital and Operating Costs

·

Environmental Requirements

·

Land use Requirements

·

Financial Plan

·

Funding Plan

·

Implementation plan


The Business Plan will guide and support the key stakeholders throughout the implementation and financing activities of the incremental rail project. Capital needs, operating costs and potential revenues will be identified. This plan will set out a development proposals and investment program to support as necessary the provisions of updated Port of Mobile infrastructure, Trade and Transport Corridor, rail, highway, air infrastructure, a full multimodal Inland Port facility to facilitate traffic movement by truck, rail, air, and water out of and into the Port of Mobile hinterland. This development will require full financial and economic justification and an understanding of the contribution the facility can make to the Texas economy in terms of jobs, income and transfer payments like tax base expansion and additional rents and fees.

3

Resources

Time Line: The work will take nine months to complete, and will involve eight meetings and presentations as shown in Exhibit 1, as the study proceeds. It is proposed that the Appalachian Regional Council (ARC) will set up a study advisory team that will meet with the study team at four workshops, where TEMS will present the work of the project and discuss key assumptions, issues, and input scenarios and strategies with the study team.

Study Cost: The study will cost $500,000 to complete including out of pocket travel costs.  Out of pocket travel costs will be billed as a direct expense.

4

Work Plan

[s1a1201701_r1024.jpg]

Mobile Trade(ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.) and Transport Corridor Work Plan


Mobile (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.) Intermodal Corridor, Research Review Team

Team Member

Affiliation

·

Dr. Mark Burton, PhD      

University of Tennessee

·

Dr. David Clarke, PhD

University of Tennessee

·

Mr. Rick Tucker

Port of Huntsville, AL

·

Mr. Jimmy Lyons

Port of Mobile, AL

·

Dr. Craig Phillip, PhD

Vanderbilt University

·

Dr. Ted Grossardt, PhD

University of Kentucky

·

Mr. Kent Sowards

Marshall University

·

Dr. Mike Hicks, PhD

Ball State University

·

Mr. Scott Hercik

Appalachian Regional Commission




Damar TruckDeck

The Company also plans to develop projects as opportunities are presented related or ancillary to the transportation or transportation-related fields. The Company entered into a contract for the acquisition of the patents, rights, titles, and business of Damar Corporation LLC, the inventor, developer and manufacturer of Damar TruckDeck. (See www.damartruckdeck.com). The Damar Corporation was incorporated in 2007 to develop, manufacture and market the truck deck component invented and developed by its owner. The Damar Corporation has filed a patent application covering its truck deck system. The Damar TruckDeck is a flexible truck deck storage and organization system that with an integrated frame allowing the cargo deck to be used as a hauling surface. The system has many configurations to fit a wide variety of uses (hunting, construction, moving, hauling, etc.) in various truck deck sizes. The Damar TruckDeck primarily consists of lockable repositionable storage units.


The Company cannot effect this agreement until its raises the funds necessary to the acquisition of such assets as listed in the agreement.


In October 2014, HSR Technology, Inc. as the equitable owner of four tax parcels located within West Manchester Township, York, PA filed a request for landowner curative amendment with the local township, with the intent of constructing facilities on the properties for the fabrication, assembly and welding of steel, aluminum and stainless steel assemblies with no foundry or casting operations. The use will include the fabrication and assembly of composite rebar, composite rail, bed liners and rail car assemblies received pre-prepared. The rail access is critical to the procurement of the land, as the products manufactured on site will be directly related to the company purpose of creating global economic development and promoting trade by bringing people together through innovative ideas and advanced technology.  HSR Technology, Inc. proposes the initial construction of a transfer and storage building with a rail siding into the building. Manufacturing and assembly buildings would be added in stages, eventually employing up to 2,800 workers.


Port Trajan Project

Baltimore Trade and Transportation Corridor Incorporating the Port Trajan Project

The changing character of marine transportation means that with the opening of the Panama Canal, only three ports on the East Coast will be able to receive Class C, D, and E container vessels that require 50 feet of water.  Baltimore is one of the three East Coast Ports that can accommodate such ships and therefore has strong potential for developing a Trade and Transportation corridor to provide inland distribution of containers.

A key part of the development of the Baltimore Trade and Transportation Corridor is the Ameri Metro Port Trajan Project. Port Trajan will be an important Inland Port for the Port of Baltimore.

Port Trajan Project

The Port Trajan 5 project is a transportation project located in the Antrim Township, Greencastle, Pennsylvania on the Interstate 81 corridor and the railroad "Crescent Corridor", a 2,500 mile network of rail and terminals.  Norfolk Southern is operating a rail-truck facility in this corridor and the State of Pennsylvania has provided funding toward the development of additional facilities along this corridor.  The Company envisions the development of the land next to such corridor, which it has termed the Port Trajan Project.  The Company anticipates that it will construct a distribution center consisting of a terminal and a rail line between the main rail track to the highway for the transition of shipping containers from the rail line to waiting trucks.  The distribution center will provide the facility for repackaging the shipments into containers or other shipments destined for final destination by truck.  



44



The Company anticipates that such project will be completed in phases the first of which is the purchase of an initial 345 acres at $350,000 per acre.  The purchase price will include all on-site horizontal improvements.  Off-site improvements will be acquired at an additional $20,000,000. The land is currently owned by a related company and the Company has entered into a letter of intent for its purchase.


On January 9, 2013, the Company signed a letter of intent with a related party to purchase land for a potential future project.  The Company was unable to meet the deposit requirements of this contract, and so in November 2013 the deposit requirements were amended to require a cash deposit of $1,000 to hold the purchase option open for the Company until institutional funding is acquired.  Future plans are to issue in excess of 10,000,000 shares of common stock to aid in funding the land purchase.  As of January 31, 2016, the $1,000 has been deposited on this contract.


On January 13, 2013, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent with a related party.  The purpose being that the Company is contracting services for the build out of the Port Trajan 5 Terminals.

On February 19, 2014, the Company entered into a Master Agreement for Production Services with Platinum Media whereby Platinum Media will provide the Company with all of its media development needs for a 5- year term. The agreement states that the fees charged to the Company will be no less than $12,000,000 per year. As of January 31, 2016[UPDATE], the Company has not been charged by Platinum Media.

Transportation Infrastructure and Vehicles


The Company also plans to develop projects as opportunities are presented related or ancillary to the transportation or transportation-related fields.

45Infrastructure

In October 2014, HSR Technology, Inc. as the equitable owner of four tax parcels located within West Manchester Township, York, PA filed a request for landowner curative amendment with the local township, with the intent of constructing facilities on the properties for the fabrication, assembly and welding of steel, aluminum and stainless steel assemblies with no foundry or casting operations. The use will include the fabrication and assembly of composite rebar, composite rail, bed liners and rail car assemblies received pre-prepared. The rail access is critical to the procurement of the land, as the products manufactured on site will be directly related to the company purpose of creating global economic development and promoting trade by bringing people together through innovative ideas and advanced technology.  HSR Technology, Inc. proposes the initial construction of a transfer and storage building with a rail siding into the building. Manufacturing and assembly buildings would be added in stages, eventually employing up to 2,800 workers.


AMERI METRO, INC.

November 1, 2016

Introduction

INTRODUCTION: THE DEMAND FOR TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE

TheSupporting Information

To support the Companys business plan, T t he United States Census Bureau predicts that the American population will reach 420 million by 2050, a trend that will overwhelm our nations transportation infrastructure.

Current estimates suggest that overall freight demand will double over the next 40 years from 15 billion tons today to 30 billion tons. The number of trucks on the road is also expected to double. Already under unsustainable strain, the nations freight transportation infrastructure and highways will face even greater challenges as the total volume of freight increases.

Extensive infrastructure expansion, such as new ports, trade corridors and high-speed rail (HSR), is critical if rail and road transportation is to help mitigate problems associated with rising fuel costs, crowded highways, and greenhouse gas emissions. Population growth and development in the U.S. have made our nation increasingly reliant on rail and highway infrastructure to transport people and freight.

Clearly, a strong, efficient freight transportation system is vital to the nations economy. Our already-strained and out-dated railways must be upgraded to handle the projected increases in freight shipping to relieve congestion on our highways. New Trade corridors are needed to support the changes in marine shipping that will need new ports and infrastructure. Equally, new high speed rail routes are needed to increase connectivity between US cities and support the emerging new economy, and reduce auto emissions.

Company Focus

We, at ARMT, Inc. are focusing on the following means to create efficient freight transportation:

·

Increase port capacity to increase our nations ability to distribute goods, making us more competitive in the global economy.

·

Develop larger, rail-served, inland distribution centers that will encourage more efficient movement of goods and create more capacity at ports.

·

Permit increased volume and speed of inland heavy freight, allowing inland distribution points to expand into larger, national service hubs and promote economic growth.

·

Develop profitable high speed rail for the fast movement of people and goods.

ARMTs assets will consist of five critical areas of ownership agreements and expertise, as well as specific facilities and product patterns. The key areas are

I.

Projects: Ten project corridors to be developed as identified by ARMTs transportation consulting firm Transportation Economics Management Systems, Inc. Chief Economist Alex Metcalf PHD.

II.

Industrial products to be used in the development process

III.

Franchise Opportunities

IV.

Partnerships and agreements

V.

Management team



461.

Projects



1. Projects

1

1.1

PORT TRAJAN DEVELOPMENT 1,122 ACRES NEXT TO CSX/NS YARDS BETWEEN HARRISBURG AND HAGERSTOWN

2

As part of the development of the Port of Baltimore Trade and Transportation, the development of inland ports such as Port Trajan is critical. However, since the Harrisburg-Hagerstown corridor is already a major logistics center for the Northeast USA, the development of Port Trajan can begin immediately and even before the Baltimore Trade and Transport Corridor is developed.


Ø

Estimated Cost of project: $1 Billion

This land is at the center of the HarrisburgHagerstown Logistics Center. Once developed Port Trajan will be a transportation multimodal hub and logistics center located in Antrim Township, Greencastle, Pennsylvania on the Interstate 81 Corridor and the intersection of the CSX and NS freight railroad Crescent Corridor, and 2,500 mile network of rail and terminals from Pennsylvania to Alabama. Both CSX and NS are developing rail-truck facilities in this corridor. ARMT envisages developing its land holdings to provide a distribution center consisting of terminals with rail connections to NS and CSX facilities. The terminals will be used for stuffing and repackaging rail containers (40 foot) to truck (52 foot) containers, storage and warehousing, and truck distribution.


1.2

PORT MOBILE AND ALABAMA TRADE AND TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR TOLL ROAD AND RAIL ROADINLAND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Ø

Estimated Cost of project: $10 Billion

ARMT, Inc. has contracted for the rights to build a 350-mile toll road and railroad connecting Orange Beach, Port of Mobile and Huntsville Trade corridor. The corridor can be developed to Memphis, Indianapolis/Chicago, Cincinnati, and Columbus. Development of corridor to include urban areas, airport, and terminal facilities. The Port of Mobile will be improved to take the large ships capable of using the Panama Canal. It will be connected to Inland Ports and airports at locations along the corridor including Huntsville, AL, Memphis, TN, Birmingham, AL, Louisville, KY and , Knoxville, TN to Columbus, OH. The project has the support of Appalachian Regional Council and specific government development agreements with the state of Alabama.

The Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc. (ATFI) as a non-profit corporation has been granted tax exempt status under the Title 26 U.S.C. 501(C)(3) for the purpose of the project. The project will be financed by tax exempt bonds issued in accordance with the joint resolutions of the Alabama House and Senate.

Mobile Trade & Transport Corridor: Population and Required Linkage




[s1a1201701_r1025.jpg]

47



Alabama Toll Facilities Inc. (Toll Road) and Train Station

[s1a1201701_r1026.jpg]


1.31.3

SARAH JEWEL MATHIAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (KSJM) & PORT OF OSTIA

1

As part of the Mobile Trade and Transportation Corridor there is the opportunity to develop a major new air cargo airport to provide increased capacity for the Southeast USA. This project will be developed with a major e-trade company like FedEx, Amazon or UPS. The e-trade market is expanding by 12-16 percent per year. It will follow the Alliance freight cargo airport development in Fort Worth, Texas.

Ø

Estimated Cost of project: $2.5 $3.0 Billion


The Sarah Jewel Mathias International Airport (KSJM) and Port of Ostia aerotropolis will revolutionize logistics in the United States. The existing transportation and distribution infrastructure in the South has been identified as insufficient to meet the anticipated demand over the next several decades. The AMRT team has developed a plan to meet the demands of the future and to combat the existing distribution shortfalls by creating the most elaborate multi-modal distribution system the world has ever seen.


The aerotropolis will be located in west-central Alabama approximately half way between the Gulf of Mexico and the Tennessee border. High speed rail, freight rail and a toll road will connect the aerotropolis with the port to the south and connections to high density population centers to the north.

The airport component of the aerotropolis has been envisioned to accommodate the next generation of mega-sized aircraft that have not yet even been designed. Many airports around the world are finding it difficult to handle the largest aircraft that are currently in service such as the Airbus A380. Most of the existing airports around the world are constrained by physical barriers that inhibit their ability to expand to accommodate the massive size of the aircraft that operate today. This will not be an issue at KSJM. The airport will have four parallel runways 18,000 feet long and 250 feet wide as well as a crosswind runway measuring 12,000 feet long and 250 feet wide. Design criteria for the taxiway system, aircraft parking areas and the runways have been planned to accommodate the new large aircraft of today as well as the next generation aircraft of tomorrow.

State-of-the-Art Facilities

Customer Reception Center

Corporate Aircraft Ramp

Nearby Residential/Retail/Hotel

Aviation Maintenance

Aviation Manufacturing

Corporate Housing

24/7 U.S. Customs Port of Entry

Full-Service Fixed-Based Operator

Research & Development

Flight Testing Facilities

Four 18,000 x 250 Runways

24/7 Air Traffic Tower - No Curfew

Unrestricted Airspace

R & D Facilities

1,600-acre Inland Rail Port

Town Center

2,300-acre Industrial Park

Competitive Rates

Incentives

Greenfield Site

Design/Build-to-Suit (Expandable)

1,800-acre Airport Business Park

Shipping & Receiving (Logistics)

State-of-the-Art Facilities

Customer Reception Center

Corporate Aircraft Ramp

Nearby Residential/Retail/Hotel

Aviation Maintenance

Aviation Manufacturing

Corporate Housing

24/7 U.S. Customs Port of Entry

Full-Service Fixed-Based Operator

Research & Development

Flight Testing Facilities




[s1a1201701_r1028.gif]


48

AIRPORT PARK - MIXED USE INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL


Mobile Sarah Jewel Mathias International Airport (KSJM) & Port of Ostia

[s1a1201701_r1029.jpg]


[s1a1201701_r1030.jpg]


49



1.4

HIGH SPEED TRAIN CORRIDOR ATLANTA BIRMINGHAM

Ø

Estimated Cost of project: $3 Billion

ARMT has the right to develop this corridor as a high speed rail connection between the cities. The aim would be to provide high speed frequent rail service that would provide improved mobility for people and goods and at the same time provide an operating profit. The project would be developed as either a freestanding enterprise or a public-private partnership (PPP) with an array of public and private support for the project. Feasibility study for the corridor has been completed by TEMS.

Atlanta to Birmingham High Speed Train Corridor

[s1a1201701_r1031.jpg]


 

1.5

HIGH SPEED RAIL CORRIDOR PITTSBURGH TO PHILADELPHIA

Ø

Estimated Cost of project: $2 Billion

ARMT is in negotiations with the state of Pennsylvania to create a Public-Private Partnership to take over High Speed Rail operations between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. The project will seek to significantly upgrade the route and train speeds to create a profitable operation for the movement of people and parcels that can be franchised to ARMT High Speed Rail Operations Company.

1.61. 4 6

TEXAS TRADE AND TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR PORT FREEPORT/SH 36A

Ø

Estimated Cost of project: $2.5 $3.0 Billion

This project would be similar to the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor. The project would provide Texas with a Gulf port (Port Freeport) with 50 feet of water capable of taking the large ships that will use the recently expanded Panama Canal. Port Freeport would serve the Dallas-Fort Worth market, which is the third largest Logistics Center in the US after Los Angeles and New York/New Jersey. The project would combine port improvements of Freeport with a new 65-mile greenfield route from the port to give more direct access to both BNSF and UP routes to the DallasFort Worth market. TEMS has completed the Investment  feasibility Grade, feasibility and Business Planning studies for the corridor. It was found that the project would produce an 8-10 percent return on investment, and provide substantial economic benefits including generating 20-30,000 new jobs in the corridor. It is anticipated that AtheA the Company would be supported by local investors and equity partners.

50



Texas Trade and Transportation Corridor After Panama Canal Expansion


[s1a1201701_r1032.jpg]

 

1.71. 5 7

PORTUS DE JEWEL PORT


Portus De-Jewel Mexico: The Portus De- Jewel Mexico, is the new premier gateway for international commerce, is located approximately 600 miles south of Yuma Arizona Intermodal Port along the Mexican coast line. The Portus De- Jewel Mexico encompasses 176,000 acres of land and water along 26 miles of waterfront. It features 40 passenger and 384 cargo terminals, including automobile, breakbulk, container, dry and liquid bulk, multi-use, and warehouse facilities that handle billions of dollars worth of cargo each year.

The Portus De-Jewel Mexico consist 64 shipping/receiving berths at lengths of 15,000 ft. each.  The total number of ships berthed at one time is 320 ships.  The water depth is constant at 55 ft.

Portus De-Jewel Mexico will intercept the following economic base from Port of Los Angeles:

·

1.1 million jobs

·

$89.2 billion in California trade value

·

$223 billion in U.S. trade value

·

$5.1 billion in state tax revenue

·

$21.5 billion in federal tax revenue

·

Port customers contribute about $760 million to the local economy.

Economic Impact

·

We will intercept shipments going to the Los Angeles Port at approximately $500 billion dollars per year.

·

Port customers will contribute approximately $27.8 billion dollars per year to the local economy within the Portus De-Jewel Mexico complex.  The Port contributes substantially to the economy, in part, through the following activities:



51



Port Industries

Port industries are businesses involved in the moving and handling of maritime cargo.

·

Dollars: For every dollar spent by port industries - another 97 cents is generated in indirect and induced sales in the region.

·

Jobs: Accounts for approximately 32,000 direct port industry jobs (85% of which are trucking and warehousing jobs).

Port Users

The biggest contributors to the economy, port users, are businesses that use the Port to receive imports or ship exports. Export manufacturers are major port users. Other port users include local manufacturers who process imported unfinished goods.

·

Dollars: Port users generate approximately $12.1 billion and stimulate an additional $5.5 billion in local industry indirect sales. Local "re-spending" by workers employed by port users and the industries they impact amount to approximately $4.1 billion. Each dollar of spending for port user goods and services produces about 79 cents of additional industry sales in the region.

Port Customers

Port customers are the retail and other non-cargo businesses in the Port. They are most important to communities near the Port as a source of jobs, recreation and specialty consumer goods.

·

Jobs: Direct jobs associated with port customers numbered about 6,400 or roughly half of the jobs actually located in the Port. For every one of these port customer jobs, nearly 1.7 additional jobs are created elsewhere in the region.

Portus De Jewel

[s1a1201701_r1033.jpg]



52



1.8 PORT1. 6 8 P P ORT CLAUDIAS (GREATER YUMA PORT) AUTHORITY AND TRADE CORRIDOR


ARMT has the developmental rights for a new port (Claudias) in the County of Yuma, Mexico and a trade corridor to be built through the Mexico-Arizona border in coordination with Federal Authorities and agencies to establish a foreign trade zone within Yuma County Arizona and developing business zones and the trade corridor through the region.

Port De Claudius and Inland Port

[s1a1201701_r1034.jpg]


HIGH SPEED RAIL CORRIDORS

1.7

ATLANTA BIRMINGHAM

Ø

Estimated Cost of project: $3 Billion

ARMT has the right to develop this corridor as a high speed rail connection between the cities. The aim would be to provide high speed frequent rail service that would provide improved mobility for people and goods and at the same time provide an operating profit. The project would be developed as either a freestanding enterprise or a public-private partnership (PPP) with an array of public and private support for the project. Feasibility study for the corridor has been completed by TEMS.

Atlanta to Birmingham High Speed Train Corridor

[s1a1201701_r1035.jpg]

1.8

PITTSBURGH TO PHILADELPHIA

Ø

Estimated Cost of project: $2 Billion

ARMT is in negotiations with the state of Pennsylvania to create a Public-Private Partnership to take over High Speed Rail operations between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. The project will seek to significantly upgrade the route and train speeds to create a profitable operation for the movement of people and parcels that can be franchised to ARMT High Speed Rail Operations Company.

1.9

OTHER HIGH SPEED RAIL PROJECTS

The following High Speed Rail corridors have been evaluated by TEMS as being projects that can be developed profitably by ARMT as a private sector or public-sector partnership projects.



Corridor

Bus Plan

 EIS

Cost to Develop

Time

 

1

Los Angeles-Phoenix-Las Vegas

X

X

$10-12 Billion








2

Hampton Roads-Richmond-Washington

ü

X

$7 Billion








3

Dallas-Ft. Worth-Houston-Austin

X

X

$15 Billion








4

Columbus-Cleveland-Cincinnati

ü

X

In Progress, $4-6 Billion








5

Denver-I-25 Corridor

ü

X

$4-6 Billion








6

Calgary-Edmonton

ü

X

In Progress, $2-3 Billion








7

New York-Washington

ü

X

$10 Billion








8

Toronto-Montreal

ü

ü

In Progress, $4-6 Billion








9

Chicago-Detroit

ü

ü

$2-3 Billion








54CONCLUSION


The development of projects will be the result of successfully completing Investment Grade Studies that show a high level of return that can sustain revenue bonds.


At this stage it is clear that the Texas (Port Freeport) Trade and Transportation Corridor is ready to move forward given the return on investment (ROI) associated with the project.

Preliminary Analysis suggests that the Port Mobile and Port Baltimore Trade and Transport Corridors are likely to produce strong returns, but need Investment Grade Studies to provide detail cash flows and ROI results. A separate study is required to assess the potential of a freight airport in the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor.

Once the Trade and Transport corridors are moving forward then Ameri Metro will turn its attention to High Speed Rail Corridors, and will select corridors for Investment Grade Studies to create a priority list for consideration. Early projects to be considered would include New York-Washington, Rochester-Twin Cities, Philadelphia-Pittsburgh and Atlanta-Birmingham

2.

Industrial Products

2.1

INTRODUCTION

ARMT plans to develop projects as opportunities are presented, related or ancillary to the transportation or transportation-related fields.

HSR Technologies, Inc. is a related party of ARMT.

HSR Technologies, Inc. as the equitable Owner/Developer has secured certain properties by agreement with the intent of constructing manufacturing facilities on the properties for the following: Fabrication, assembly and welding of; steel, aluminum and stainless steel with no foundry or casting operations.

HSR Technologies, Inc. has chosen the properties in question for industrial development after an extensive search of York County properties.

The requirements for the proposed development proposedwere:proposedwere:

The property has 449+/- acres which will allow for the development area needed while providing future expansion capabilities. Rail service is critical to the business model, which is based on rail use. The site in question has 3,600 linear feet of rail line traversing it and provides ample areas for siding access. Access to major roadways is a critical component of any manufacturing use. The subject properties have direct access to an arterial road, West College Avenue, a state road; a collector road, Hokes Mill Road, also a state road; and three local roads, offering many potential points of access. Also, the site is within 2200 feet of PA Route 462 and the Route 30 bypass.


2.2

HIGHWAY REBAR

The Company has the right to a new rebar product that can be used in its development of highways and rail route structures. ARMT would manufacture the Rebar for use in projects like the Alabama Toll Road, and the Texas Trade Corridor, and Yuma Trade Corridor.

The Company is the only USA composite C-Rebar Company that is federally certified to meet all federal specs for use in any government funded projects. Congress gave final approval a $109- billion transportation funding bill. Included in the compromise legislation is a provision that calls for the use of total life-cycle cost analysis as part of the contract-awarding process for new federal projects. The result could be billions of dollars in new business for the composites industry.

The fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites industry has long advocated for the U.S. Congress to require the states to employ a life-cycle cost assessment when issuing contracts for infrastructure construction.

As a practical matter, such a provision will save money because new infrastructure construction would take into account both the cost of installation and long-term upkeep, rather than awarding a contract solely on the basis of lowest initial cost. According to the new bill, the engineering analysis used by the State Departments of Transportation for awarding construction contracts for highway bridge projects shall "be evaluated by the State ... on engineering and economic bases, taking into consideration. Acceptable designs for bridges ... and ... using an analysis of life-cycle costs and duration of project construction." This change paves the way for the use of composites and other high-performance materials in major infrastructure projects.

"These life-cycle cost analysis requirements should push the states toward the use of longer-life and lower-maintenance-cost designs, including projects that employ non-rusting and light-weight components


55



such as Composite C- REBAR, girders, and deck systems," says the Senior Director of Government Affairs at the American Composites Manufacturers Association, John Schweitzer. "There are over 600,000 highway bridges in the U.S., making this a very large potential market for FRP composite products." For more information about the benefits of life Dee-cycle cost assessment read this white paper by transportation policy expert and three decade veteran of the Congressional Research Service, John W. Fischer.

In February 2011, the Company issued an offer letter to purchase a rebar plant for cash of $4,750,000 and an option to purchase management services to support the operations of the plant. The Company is also engaged in development of other transportation projects, specifically the development of a toll road in the State of Alabama Company need 400 MILLION FEET of Composite C- Rebar for the toll road project in the State of Alabama. HSR Technologies, Inc. site will facilitate the manufacturing and distribution of Composite C- Rebar.

U.S. Patent Numbers: 5,702,816; 5,763,042; 5,851,468; 5,876,553; 6,485,660 B1; and 6,493,914 B2

2.3

COMPOSITE RAILROAD TIES

ARMT holds the patent for producing rail ties that will be used to build the railroad system in projects like Penn Port and the Mobile and Texas and Yuma Trade corridors.

On April 16, 2012 the Company entered into an agreement to purchase intellectual property from a related party in exchange for $8,000,000 per country license. The Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to secure contract rights. HSR Technologies, Inc. site will facilitate the manufacturing and distribution of Composite Rail Road Ties. Company will use over 40 million Composite Rail Road Ties for its current projects.

U.S. Patent Number: 5,996,901; 7,931,210


2.4

RAILCAR/LOCOMOTIVE PRODUCTION CAPABILITY

Hi Speed Rail Car Assembly Line: constructing facilities on the properties for the fabrication, assembly and welding of steel, aluminum and stainless steel assemblies The use will include the fabrication rail car assemblies received pre-prepared. The company believes that the United States suffers from an overburdened transportation infrastructure and that a fundamental overhaul of the national transportation structure is needed. The Company anticipates that it will be able to assist in this fundamental overhaul by providing both the hands-on expertise and investment resources to establish an intermodal grid comprised of transportation and support services extending to urban and outlying areas alike.

The Company is focused on the development of efficient transportation systems, primarily high-speed rail networks for passenger and freight and the ancillary transportation projects related to such high speed rail systems and the import and export of goods and services through an International Free Trade Zone for this and other properties.  The Company anticipates that it will, directly or through subsidiaries, develop plans and then coordinate and supervise the financing, construction and development of such transportation projects by bringing together the resources, plans, financing, approvals and HSR Technologies, Inc. needed to implement such transportation systems.

HSR Technologies, Inc. has chosen the properties in question for industrial development after an extensive search of York County properties. The requirements for the development proposed were:

A significant amount of adjacent land is open and undeveloped land. In this case, the 449+/- acres will allow for the development area needed while providing future expansion capabilities. Rail service is critical to the business



56



model, which is based on rail use. The site in question has 3,600 lineal feet of rail line traversing it and provides ample areas for siding access.

Access to major roadways is a critical component of any manufacturing use. The subject properties have direct access to an arterial road, West College A venue, a state road; a collector road, Hokes Mill Road, also a state road; and three local roads, offering many potential points of access. Also, the site is within 2200' of PA Route 462 and the Route 30 bypass.

The subject properties provide a rare combination of components needed to establish a world class industrial manufacturing campus.

ARMT owns the Colorado Railcar manufacturing facility that it will use to produce railroad vehicles for use on its rail corridors. These include the PittsburghPhiladelphia corridor, MobileHuntsville, BirminghamAtlanta corridor.

ARMT has entered into an agreement with RELCO Locomotives Inc., to obtain custom built equipment for both passenger and freight rail operations.

2.5

DAMAR TRUCK DECK

Damar TruckDeck: AMI entered into a contract on June 10, 2010 for the acquisition of the patents, rights, titles, and business of Damar Corporation LLC, the Inventor/developer/manufacturer of Damar TruckDeck. The Damar TruckDeck is a flexible truck deck storage and organization system with an integrated frame allowing the cargo deck to be used as a hauling surface. Damar TruckDeck. The system has many configurations to fit a wide variety of uses (hunting, construction, moving, hauling, etc.) in various truck deck sizes. The Damar TruckDeck primarily consists of lockable repositionable storage units.  

The advantages of the Damar TruckDeck system are as follows:

1.

Organize gear in removable containers with the DAMAR Load-N-Go containers, easily converting a truck's usage by quickly swapping containers.

2.

Protect items in lockable hatches. Lockable, repositionable hatches protect items in the Load-N-Go containers from theft and weather while a rear hatch allows the full length of the bed to be used for securing longer materials.

3.

Keep ability to haul large items. The recessed CargoDeck surface is built to support and haul large materials and equipment, and by maintaining some bed wall height there is no need to strap items down.

4.

Can be installed or removed in minutes by one person with no tools and no drilling. The Damar Corporation has entered into contracts for sale of its Damar TruckDeck with Lowe's, The Home Depot, Advanced Auto Parts, Sam's Club, Costco and Meyer Distributing.

ARMT plans to develop projects that are related to transportation operations and equipment. The company entered into a contract for the acquisition of the patents, rights, and business of Damar Corporation LLC. The Damar Truck deck is a flexible deck storage system that with an integrated frame allows the cargo deck to be used as a hauling surface. This allows its use in construction, hauling, equipment, moving and a variety of other uses. The system can be easily installed or removed. It is currently marketed to Lowes, Home Depot, Sams Club, Costco and Meyer Distributing.

U.S. Patent Number: 8,210,592

573.



3. Franchise


The development of the Trade and Transport Corridors and High Speed Rail Corridors will result in significant franchise operations. These include

Ø

Fuel: ARMT will franchise fuel and energy for vehicles moving in the corridors it develops.

Ø

Corridor Centers for Food/Restaurants/Hotels: Food/restaurants and hotels at major intersections and terminal areas associated with its Trade, Toll and Rail corridors.

Ø

Logistic Technology Applications: ARMT will develop advanced High Speed operations for Truck and Rail freight and passenger operations. High Speed Truck Lanes, truck trains and automatic truck operations will be included in Ameri Metro Toll Roads. High Speed Rail Freight and Passenger operations with train speeds up to 240 mph will be developed.

Ø

Pipelines: Pipeline operations will be developed where appropriate to facilitate crude oil movements to coastal refineries from inland oil fields and facilities.

Ø

Cable: Cable will be laid along ARMT corridors to increase capacity for phoneline operators.

Ø

Parking: Parking facilities will be developed at critical network locations and at network nodes.

Ø

Advertising: Advertising facilities will be developed as appropriate along ARMT corridors and key locations at Terminals and Facilities.

Ø

Franchise Zones: ARMT has developed a nationwide franchise Zone System that it will use with both projects and products. The franchise zone system allows ARMT to recognize regional differences in pricing and franchising its market products. The zone system is given on the next page.

Ø

Franchise Zones


[s1a1201701_r1037.gif]






58



ZONE 1: CA, NV, OR, WA
ZONE 2: FL, GA, NC, SC
ZONE 3: ME, NH, MA, RI, CT, VT
ZONE 4: DC, DE, MD, NJ
ZONE 5: NY, OH, PA, VA, WV
ZONE 6: AL, KY, MS, TN
ZONE 7: AR, IL, IN, LA, MO
ZONE 8: OK, TX
ZONE 9: IA, MI, MN, WI
ZONE 10: NE, MT, ND, SD
ZONE 11: CO, KS, NM, WY
ZONE 12: AZ, ID, UT

4.

Partnerships


4.1

INCHCAPE SHIPPING SERVICES (ISS) - PORT TRAJAN AGENT

Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS) is one of the worlds leading maritime services providers. Through its proprietary network of some 290 offices employing over 3,900 people across 65 countries, ISS provides its customers with an unparalleled global resourced delivered locally and tailored to each customers individual needs.  It is an independently owned and managed company not under the control of the Organizer. Its diversified customer base includes clients across the oil, cruise, container and bulk commodity sectors, and it is engaged in serving naval, governmental and inter-governmental clients. Additionally, ISS provides landside commercial and humanitarian logistics, transit, offshore support and other associated marine services. ISS also provides a growing range of outsourcing services. These include global crew and marine spares logistics; port agency management and commercial representation; and sophisticated Enterprise Resource Planning solutions through its subsidiary ShipNet and other associated organizations.

ARMT engaged agent, Inchcape Shipping Services Group as its freight operations and managers of its freight cargoes at ports and inland ports. The company has 3,900 employees worldwide to provide freight management services, shipping logistics, and freight cargo handling.


4.2

AIRPORT SERVICES

ARMT is in the process of developing agreements for four types of airport services at its airport facilities like KSJM airport.  These include:

·

Passenger Terminals

·

Air Cargo Terminals

·

Corporate Jet Services

·

Foreign Airline FAA Inspection Maintenance Service Terminals

ARMT is in discussions with several air service providers, and would expect to be able to announce a partnership once the Port Mobile Trade and Transportation Corridor moves forward.



59



4.3

EARTH MOVING AND ROUTE (HIGHWAY/RAIL) GRADING

The development of ARMT rights-of-way will involve considerable earth moving and route grading requirements. ARMT intends to enter into agreement with a major equipment supplier for vehicles to meet its construction needs. Specifically, ARMT will contract for earth moving equipment once the initial Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor moves forward.

4.4

ATLANTIC ENERGY & UTILITY PRODUCTS, INC. (AEUP)

AEUP is a related party of the Company. ARMT entered in to an agreement with non-related party a gasoline retail store to provide management services for fee. The fee schedule is base fee plus percentage of net revenue .The agreement call for Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc. the right to purchase but not obligation to purchase the operations as part of its long range plan.

4.5

HSR PASSENGER SERVICES, INC. (HPS)

HSP is a related party of ARMT. This Company was setup to handle all on site booking, reservations, and food services; as well as hotel booking services at the industrial and technology parks. HPS entered in to an agreement with non-related party a convenience retail store operator / subway shop to provide management services for fee. The fee schedule is base fee plus percentage of net revenue .The agreement call for (HPS) the right to purchase but not obligation to purchase the operations as part of its long range plan.

4.6

MALIBU HOMES, INC.  (MH)

HM is a related party of the Company. It was up Designed to establish residential home building services. MH entered in to an agreement with non-related party. The agreement is a sales agreement for property. The property is Seller financed.

4.7

PLATINUM MEDIA, INC.

Platinum Media, Inc. is a related party of ARMT. This company was to provide all media related services. On February 19, 2014 the Company entered into a Master Agreement for Production Services with Platinum Media whereby Platinum Media will provide the Company with all of its media development needs for a 5 year term.

4.8

TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. (TEMS): PROJECT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

TEMS is a specialist firm who are experts in Business Planning for Trade Corridor/High Speed Rail. TEMS will provide Investment Grade Business and Financial Plans for use with Wall Street investment banking firms.  TEMS has considerable trade corridor and high speed rail experience including:including


60



the following :

Trade Corridor Qualifications

[s1a1201701_r1038.jpg]

This study was undertaken to identify the potential of Port Freeport Texas to become a major container terminal port and the investment case for building a new rail line to avoid the railroad congestion of the City of Houston, and serve the inland markets of Dallas/Ft. Worth and a hinterland that could stretch as far north as Chicago, as far west as Denver, and as far east as Birmingham.

The analysis evaluated the traffic potential for Gulf and East Coast ports of the opening of the Panama Canal using the traffic and revenue models that TEMS developed for the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) and which is in use today by ACP to estimate container, grain, auto, and petro chemical, traffic volumes and revenues. The analysis estimated the market share for Port Freeport. This analysis was made in the environment of larger ships using the Panama Canal and the expansion and deepening to 65 foot of Port Freeport. The Port Freeport expansion included On Dock Rail Facilities and the building of a new rail link 60 miles from Port Freeport to Rosenberg where the new line would connect to the UP, BNSF, and KCS railroads and would bypass the city of Houston.

The analysis estimated the size of the hinterland of Port Freeport and prepared forecasts for traffic from Port Freeport to the hinterland 2020 to 2050. The analysis estimated the costs for developing the Port and its infrastructure and then provided a financial and economic analysis using USDOT Tiger Grant Cost Benefit methodology. The analysis also evaluated the operating and capital cost benefits to the freight railroads of using the new rail connection at a cost per mile of 29 percent of the Alameda Corridor in Los Angeles.

SERVICES PROVIDED: Container traffic market share by port and forecasts, rail and highway inland distribution from ports, operating and capital costs, financial and economic analysis.

[s1a1201701_r1039.jpg]

[s1a1201701_r1040.jpg]

MARITIME ADMINISTRATION/U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: IMPACT OF HIGH OIL PRICES ON FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION MODAL SHIFT POTENTIAL IN FIVE CORRIDORS

TEMS prepared an overview and background synopsis on the historical and potential impacts of oil price increases on the total transportation market, mode shares, and industrial distribution logistics. This included evaluating existing trends in rail, truck, and water markets, together with an assessment of the evolving market conditions and changes in modal competitiveness, particularly with respect to long distance movements using period 2008 to 2040. TEMS forecast traffic changes for water, rail and truck traffic in five corridors including the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway. The five corridors cover ninety-five percent of U.S. population. TEMS evaluated the market share impact and assessed the energy and environmental benefits of the market share changes using the GOODS model.

61



SERVICES PROVIDED: Market share analysis, energy and environmental impacts, traffic forecasts, economic analysis, and technology assessments.


[s1a1201701_r1042.gif]

SAN PEDRO PORTS: ALAMEDA FREIGHT CORRIDOR

TEMS provided financial and economic advice to PaineWebber and Goldman, Sachs in the preparation of a $2 billion bond issue to finance a 15mile freight corridor across the City of Los Angeles. TEMS performed macroeconomic analysis, port and freight traffic projections, and tolls and user fees, and assessed the economic benefits of the project. A key TEMS responsibility was preparing the West Coast Ports Competitive Model and assessing the revenue potential of the San Pedro (Los Angeles and Long Beach) port complex, the fourth largest port in the world.

The freight forecasts were based on traffic and trade data developed specifically for the project from a variety of sources, including the U.S. Department of Commerce, Piers Journal of Commerce, and WEFA macroeconomic trade forecasts. From these sources, TEMS developed a Base Year origin-destination matrix for freight flows on a commodity and mode basis.

TEMS prepared these forecasts using a range of macroeconomic scenarios and trade regulatory conditions. The analysis considered the impacts of NAFTA on North American trade and traffic, as well as the expansion of European, Asian and Latin American trade blocks. The forecasts were then disaggregated on a mode basis and were evaluated in terms of improvements to new transport technologies and systems and the impact of new infrastructure and tariff systems.

SERVICES PROVIDED:  Demand, revenue, financial analysis, economic, and cost/benefit assessment of freight feasibility, implementation and port master planning


[s1a1201701_r1043.jpg]

AUTORIDAD DEL CANAL DE PANAMAS (ACP): PANAMA CANAL ROUTE CHOICE MODEL

TEMS developed within the GOODS Model framework, a route choice model for the Panama Canal. Using a zone system designed to reflect world trade flows between North America and the rest of the world, TEMS developed a route choice model using the GOODS equilibrium model structure. The origin-destination data showed the country of origin and destination for container, vehicle, and grain flows. Container traffic was dissaggregated to include food, industrial goods, furniture, computers, raw materials, and finished goods. The North American market was broken down into thirteen regions, and connected to the major port systems such as Pacific North West, Southern California, Gulf, Northeast Ports, etc. A supplyside generalized cost model was developed linking all the major international traffic flows to North America. The analysis segmented markets on a geographic basis and over 54 individual models were calibrated to identify specific market characteristics.

The model was used to forecast a range of impacts on world trade including: oil prices, maritime costs, port congestion, and distribution costs. A full sensitivity analysis was completed showing the impact of socioeconomic growth trends, as well as the impact of specific transportation issues such as labor costs, oil prices, port charges, canal tolls, and inland distribution costs. As a result, a full range of risk factors were developed showing the likely changes in world trade and their impact on Panama Canal traffic and revenue.

SERVICES PROVIDED: Freight analysis, route choice forecasts, cargo forecasts, technology assessment and economic assessment




62



High Speed Rail Corridor Qualifications

[s1a1201701_r1045.gif]

NINE MIDWEST STATES AND THE FRA: MIDWEST REGIONAL RAIL INITIATIVE (MWRRI)

The MWRRI is an ongoing effort to improve and expand the passenger rail system in the Midwest. The program is sponsored by the Federal Railroad Administration, and the transportation agencies of nine states: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

TEMS led the consultant team and provided ridership and revenue forecasts, operations planning, technology assessment, financial and economic analysis, institutional arrangements, implementation, and business planning, and directed the work of the other members of the consultant team.

SERVICES PROVIDED: Operations analysis, demand forecasting, technology assessment, station planning, financial planning, market and economic assessment, institutional planning and public financing.

[s1a1201701_r1047.gif]

OHIO RAIL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: OHIO AND LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL OHIO HUB STUDY - BUSINESS PLAN

As part of the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative, TEMS was retained to develop a business plan for the Ohio and Lake Erie Cleveland Hub Regional Rail System. In developing the business plan, an extensive analysis of the engineering, operations, ridership, and revenues associated with the project was carried out. Using this data, TEMS built a business plan that assessed both the financial and economic potential of the system. The evaluation assessed the potential for public/private partnerships and the role of federal funding for the project. To meet this need, the economic evaluation used both US DOT, and a private sector evaluation of the economic benefits of the project.

SERVICES PROVIDED: Demand forecasting, economic analysis, market assessment, project funding


[s1a1201701_r1048.jpg]

MAJOR INTERNATIONAL RAILROAD: NORTHEAST CORRIDOR HIGH SPEED RAIL BUSINESS PLAN

TEMS has been involved in developing an evaluation of high-speed train operations in the Northeast Corridor.  TEMS has assessed the full range of potential technologies and considered the need for new routes and alignments and their impact on train performance and both ridership and revenue.  TEMS has compared its results to those of Amtraks Vision Plan and has identified ways to develop more effective operations for commuter and regional rail, and freight rail while providing improved high-speed rail timetables.  TEMS also considered the potential for integrating high-speed rail and airline operations.

SERVICES PROVIDED: Ridership and revenue forecasting, operations planning, route analysis, capital and operating costs, financial and economic impact analyses.


[s1a1201701_r1050.gif]


63



ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAIL AUTHORITY: HIGH-SPEED RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY - BUSINESS PLAN

For the Rocky Mountain Rail Authority, TEMS developed a comprehensive business plan.  The business plan was based on a market analysis for the corridor that defined base and forecast ridership and revenues for business, commuter, social and tourist travelers. The market analysis was used to evaluate three different technologies - 79 mph, 110 mph, and 125 mph. Specific operating and engineering plans were developed for each technology, and they were assessed using USDOT/FRA public-private partnership criteria. This required a positive operating ratio and cost benefit ratio. To support the public outreach for the project, TEMS completed an Economic Rent Analysis showing the benefits to each community of developing the passenger rail system.

SERVICES PROVIDED: Rail ridership, station planning, rail operation analysis, route analysis and engineering, business plan, financial and economic analysis.


[s1a1201701_r1051.jpg]

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: RIDERSHIP AND REVENUE UPDATE STUDY

TEMS recently updated the ridership and revenue forecasts for the Michigan Passenger Rail System. TEMS updated the socioeconomics, modal networks and traffic volumes for the three Michigan corridors using the MWRRI zone system, and values of time.  TEMS used the 2010 database to estimate ridership and revenue for both Phase 1 and Phase 7 of the MWRRI build out.  Forecasts were made for 2020 and 2030 on a business and non-business purpose.  The study estimated the rail ad competitive modes (auto, air, and bus) market shares and identified the impact of rail travel time, on-time performance, and frequency on ridership and revenue forecasts. The study also estimated the impact of the Chicago Hub and specifically the building of the Illinois and Wisconsin corridors.

SERVICES PROVIDED: Ridership and revenue forecast.

[s1a1201701_r1052.jpg]

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: HIGH-SPEED RAIL PLANNING SERVICES: ATLANTA-LOUISVILLE-BIRMINGHAM-JACKSONVILLE

TEMS provided the Operating Plans and Costs along with the financial and economic analysis for three Georgia corridors. Atlanta-Birmingham, Atlanta-Louisville, and Atlanta-Jacksonville.  TEMS supported HNTB and PB with the development of new alignments for both 110-mph and 220-mph steel wheel technology along with a Maglev corridor for the Birmingham-Louisville corridor. TEMS estimated operating costs considering cost drivers such as train miles, passenger miles, and fixed costs.

Once the ridership and revenue and capital costs were calculated, TEMS provided both the financial and economic analysis for each corridor and technology.  TEMS completed a sensitivity analysis using high and low estimates of ridership and capital costs.

SERVICES PROVIDED: Operating Plans, Operating Costs, Financial and Economic Analysis.



64



4.9

ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERING

EASTERN DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN, INC. (ED&D)

ED&D is a related party of ARMT This company was set-up to provide all architectural  service and civil engineering. ED&D entered in to an agreement with non-related party to provide civil engineering and architectural service for fee for the development of liquor and convenience store. Work is in progress.

ARCHITECTS

MICHAEL M. RAPHAEL - ARCHITECT

Architectural Registration:Pennsylvania / Virginia / Texas

Education:Bachelor of Architecture - Virginia Tech 1972; Master of Theology - Christian Bible College and Seminary


Experience:With more than 40 years experience in a successful Architectural career Mr. Raphael is

proficient and highly skilled in all phases of the design process including:

·

Client Relations

·

Space Programming

·

Master Planning

·

New Urbanism Code analysis

·

Schematic Design

·

Design Development

·

Contract Documents

·

Specification writing

·

Construction Administration.


Mr. Raphaels experience ranges from small commercial projects to mega-retail and mega-corporate projects including the design of:

1. Ameri Metro Port Design and Planning

2. Ameri Metro Master Planning of Jubilee Square and other Ameri Metro Towns

3. Ameri Metro Corporate Office Building

4. Medical office Buildings

5. Police Departments and other Governmental Facilities

6. Retail / Commercial Buildings / Tenant Interior Design and Build-out


Business Ownership:

Crigler Raphael Associates, PC 1985 1990 Owner / Vice-President

Raphael Architects, PC 1990 1999 Owner / President

Architectural Design Associates, PC 1999 2012 Owner / President


Current Position: Freeland Engineering and Architecture - Chief Architect.



JEFFREY CLAYTON SCHAEFFER - ARCHITECT

Education: Bachelor of Architecture, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, NC, 2006; Bachelor of Arts degree in Architecture, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 1991


Experience:With over twenty years experience in architectural design including management and three in corporate interiors, I have exceptional skills and experience in planning, detailing, designing and coordinating projects both in the public and private sectors. My excellent communication, public relations, problem-solving and leadership skills, combined with my deep knowledge of building codes, make me a highly valuable employee, team player and leader.




65



Project Types:commercial/residential design, civic centers, remodeling/renovations, and landscaping.

Responsibilities including:

·

Solely responsible for client/design/contractor coordination and contract documentations per Washington, D.C. permitting standards as well as Virginia and North Carolina.

·

Executing all phases of architectural design (including site analysis, programming, schematic design, design development, code research, construction documents, and construction administration)

·

Performed remodeling/renovations, interior design and decorating including various palette board presentations, photography, carpentry, etc. (80% of work)

·

Executing 3-D renderings (free-hand and digital), documenting all phases of architectural design, and permits (when applicable)

·

Performed hands-on construction work.


Business Ownership:

JK² Design Group LLC, Washington, D.C./Fredericksburg, VA./Charlotte, N.C. [June 2012 to present]

Owner / Principal


ENGINEER


MR. JERRY T. STAHLMAN, P.E. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

Education:Civil Engineering, University of Massachusetts, 1967


Experience:Mr. Stahlman is a Registered Professional Engineer and has over 40 years experience in Engineering Design and Construction of Infrastructure and utility projects.


Mr. Stahlmans experience includes working with the U.S. Department of Agriculture on regional flood control projects and with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection in the waste water treatment permit division.


Business Ownership:

Mr. Stahlman is owner and manager of Stahlman Engineering, a design company specializing in Infrastructural Systems. This work includes regional wastewater treatment systems, roadways and bridges and interceptor and collection systems. His experience includes Engineering reports for financing regional plants with tax free bonds.


Mr. Stahlman has served as past president of the Central Section of the Water Pollution Control Association of Pennsylvania, past chairman of the Warrington Township Board of Supervisors and as past president of the York County Association of Townships of the Second Class.

5.

Management Team


THE ARMT MANAGEMENT TEAM CONSISTS OF

SHAH MATHIAS ARMT  FOUNDING PARTNERFOUND ING PARTN ER

Mr. Shah Mathias founded ARMT and leads its Merger & Acquisitions and New Business Development team.  Mr. Mathias served as Chief Executive Officer and President of ARMT  He served as the President, Treasurer and Secretary of Yellowwood Acquisition Corp. since April 17, 2012. In 2002, he started PennDel Land Co., and is its Owner.  He serves as Secretary of Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. Mr. Mathias has an extensive background in real estate and property development. Beginning in 1988, he commenced his career in real estate with the personal acquisition and like-kind exchange sales of investment property. In 1992, Mr. Mathias started a mortgage-banking corporation underwriting loans under his own name and selling such loans on the open market. By 2000, his company had underwritten more than $1 billion in loans. He serves as Chairman of Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. He served as Director of ARMT since June 12,



66



2012. He served as a Director of Yellowwood Acquisition Corp. since April 17, 2012. Mr. Mathias received his education at Penn State Institute of Technology.

MR. HAROLD HATCHETT, III, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Mr. Harold Hatchett, III, as ARMT Director and Chief Financial Officer has worked for several major corporations such as Royal Dutch Shell, Bertelsmann Music Group, Aetna and Heritage Inks International (a Citicorp Venture Capital company) over his 30+ year career. He has recently served as Group Managing Partner and CFO for OCTCET Inc., from 08/2012 to present. Mr. Hatchet served as Shell CFO of Upstream Americas, from 04/2011 to 05/2012; Shell COO Business Services, UK from04/2000 to 07/2003. Shell VP Investor Relations Americas, from10/2003/ to 06/2011; and Shell VP External Engagement Strategy, from 07/2011 to 04/2012.     

Harold serves on the Executive Advisory Board of the School of Business and Economics at North Carolina A&T University and Longwood University. He is a Board of Directors member of the Executive Leadership Council. Also, he is a former Board of Directors member of Affinity Health Plan in NY and served as Treasurer. He is of graduate Longwood University, BS, Finance & Accounting.

RONALD N. SILBERSTEIN CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Ronald N. Silberstein, as ARMT Chief Operating Officer and a Director. Mr. Silberstein, a Certified Public Accountant and a Certified Franchise Executive, was previously Managing Member of the Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPA firm, from 08/2010 to 07/2014 and has extensive experience with entrepreneurial companies, having worked with them either as clients or as a C-level executive for more than 30 years.  He is a 1979 graduate of the University of Michigans Stephen M. Ross School of Business.

GENERAL COUNSEL

John W. Thompson serves as Director for ARMT in York, PA.  Mr. Thompson was a judge on the York County Court of Common Pleas in York County, Pennsylvania. He was elected to the court in 1997 and was retained in 2007 for 10-year term, expiring in 2017. Thompson retired before the end of his last term on May 31, 2015 Thompson received both his undergraduate and J.D. degrees from the University of Pittsburgh.

FINANCIAL COUNSEL

Special financing counsel

Scott Dietterick, Esq.
James Smith Dietterick & Connelly, LLP. 
Hershey, PA

SEC Attorney

Matthew McMurdo, Esq

New York, NY

Infrastructure counsel

William Sundstrom, Esq.

                                                                                                                                                                     Robert Brannen, Esq
Sundstrom & Mindlin
Tallahassee, FL

Special securities counsel

Jim Cassidy, Esq.
Cassidy & Associates
Washington, DC



67



Special tax counsel

Belinda France, Esq.
France Law Firm
Tallahassee, FL

Special Financial advisor

SUSQUEHANNA MORTGAGE BANKER CORP
ING INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO.  Asset Manager
Penn Venture Capital, Inc.


BUSINESS PLANNING

Alexander Metcalf, PhD (Planning) Transportation Economics &  Management Systems, Inc.

Dr.  Alexander Metcalf, President of TEMS will serve as Project Director for ARMT Investment Grade studies. Dr. Metcalf personally directs all projects at TEMS and has built the firms reputation based on professional product and close client interaction. Dr. Metcalf is a professional transport economist with 30 years of freight and passenger planning experience. Previously, Dr. Metcalf was Chief Economist for British Rail and was responsible for the planning of a number of major rail freight passenger and port projects including the East Coast Main Line ($8 Billion), Channel Tunnel ($16 Billion), as well as the West Coast 125HST program ($5 Billion). His recent projects include the Panama Canal-ACP, Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway New Cargoes/New Vessels Market Assessment-USDOT, Port Freeport-SH 36A Rail Corridor Study, Alameda Corridor-Port of Los Angeles, Great Lakes Trade Study-Transport Canada, Great Lakes Bulk Ships Cost Benefit Study, USDOT Channel Tunnel Freight Corridor Project-Transmark, North American Ports Model-Goldman Sachs, and Northeast Corridor Freight Market Study-UBS Painewebber.  

Dr. Metcalfs recent high speed rail projects include Northeast Corridor High Speed Rail Study, Detroit-Chicago EIS Tier 1 Demand Forecasting Study, Atlanta-Charlotte EIS Tier 1 Operations Planning, Hampton Roads High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Vision Plan, Rocky Mountain High-Speed Rail Business Plan Study, Tri-State III High-Speed Rail Study, VIA Rail Feasibility Study and Business Plan, Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior High-Speed Restoration of Intercity Passenger Rail Service - Comprehensive Feasibility Study and Business Plan, Ohio and Lake Erie (Ohio Hub) Regional Rail System, Midwest Regional Rail System, Florida Intercity Passenger Rail Business Plan, Alberta High Speed Rail Investment Ridership Study.

Dr. Metcalf was Chair of the European Freight Movement Study Technical Committee that was carried out by the European Community (EEC) and a member of the Steering Committee for the EEC European Passenger Transport Study. Dr. Metcalf has completed studies for the Investment Banks, World and Asian Banks, as well as Federal and State governments across the US.

Education

PhD/1974/London University/ Transport Economics

B.S./1968/London University/ Economics




68



EMS TEAM


Key Personnel: Dr. Metcalf will be supported by two key individuals

Dr. Edwin Chip Kraft, the Director of Transport Operations at TEMS brings more than 25 years of expertise in passenger and freight transportation planning systems. Dr. Kraft has led operational, logistics, financial and planning studies, as well as management system development projects. He is currently the lead developer for the CSX Railroad, Yard of the Future project. He will lead the transport operations planning work for water, truck, and railroad analysis.  Dr. Krafts projects include the Great Lakes Bulk Ships Cost Benefit Study,

 Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway project, USDOT five corridor freight transportation analyses, Panama Canal Demand Study, and the Hamilton Ontario Container Port Study, the Yard of the Future for CSX Rail, SH 36A Corridor Study for Port Freeport. His high speed rail projects include Atlanta-Charlotte, Hampton Roads-Washington corridor, Northeast Corridor, Chicago-Twin Cities, and Florida Statewide High Speed Rail Study.

Education

PhD/1998/University of Pennsylvania/Systems EngineeringMS/Engineering

MS/1983/University of Pennsylvania/Civil Engineering

BS/1982/University of Pennsylvania/Civil and Urban Engineering / Economics


Dr. Yang He is Senior Transportation Analyst with TEMS' and leads the system modeling and analysis team. With more than 12 years experience, he has been involved in the development of the TEMS software development, in particular the development of the COMPASS passenger rail model.  He will be responsible for database development, traffic and revenue, and capacity analysis for the studies. Dr. Yang has also developed the latest versions of the GOODS model and its update to incorporate the latest Decision Choice models. Dr. Hes freight projects include the Great Lakes Bulk Ships Cost Benefit Study, Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway project, USDOT five corridor freight transportation analysis, Panama Canal Demand Study and software, and the and SH 36A Corridor Study for Port Freeport. His high speed rail projects include Hampton Roads, Chicago-Detroit, Chicago-Twin Cities, Atlanta-Birmingham, Rocky Mountain High Speed Rail Study Business Plan, and Northeast Corridor High Speed Rail Study.

Education

PhD/2007/University of Arizona/Systems and Industrial Engineering (minor in Management Information Systems)

MS/2002/University of Arizona/Systems Engineering

BE/1998/University of Beijing/Engineering Management


 

696.



6. Ameri Metro Organization and Operation


6.1

ARMT SET-UP OF OPERATION

ARMT and its wholly owned subsidiary Global Transportation and Infrastructure, Inc. are truly Pioneers of Global transportation and Infrastructure projects. Leading the world into better tomorrow by CHANGING THE WAY YOU MOVE.  As the US and World population is rapidly increasing and global Infrastructure is being surpassed in its ability to safely and adequately provide the effective transportation for sustainable economics. Infrastructure is becoming inadequate and dilapidated. Governing authorities ability to keep up with preventative maintenance and replacement is lacking funding. Studies have consistently shown that the development of Infrastructure permeates economics growth. Lacks of funding due to global financial crises have sent governments into restructuring their budgets and bail outs have further reduced the possibility for governmental funding.

ARMT management team has recognized the need for its knowhow and its ability to curb the financial burden on the governments and taxpayer alike.  ARMT has developed a sold global approach to lead the world into a better tomorrow by CHANGING THE WAY YOU MOVE.

[s120161121r1044.jpg]

Due to scale and complexity of infrastructure finance much thought has been given by ARMT to overall financial requirements, and the functionality of financial structure of ARMT operation.

[s1a1201701_r1053.jpg]


ARMT has created the private finance and foundationF f oundation for three profits entities:

1.

Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (ATFI)

2.

Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. (HSRF)

3.

Hi Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. (HSFP)

These three entities play a vital role in financing. The non-profits statues provides a vehicle to issue bonds and help secure Infrastructure projects non-profit has the discretion to turn over the Infrastructure projects to the state or the governing body having jurisdiction after it has successfully developed and paid for the projects.  However, in order to support the functionality of financial structure and manage the development of specific projects, sixteen for profit entities have been developed under ARMT umbrella:

70

1.

HSR Freight Line, Inc.

2.

HSR Passenger Services, Inc.

3.

HSR Technologies, Inc.

4.

HSR Logistics, Inc.

5.

KSJM International Airport, Inc.

6.

Port of Ostia, Inc.

7.

Port of De Claudius, Inc.

8.

Ameri Cement, Inc.

9.

Lord Chauffeurs LTD.

10.

Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc.

11.

Penn Insurance Services LLC

12.

Cape Horn Abstracting

13.

Eastern Development & Design, Inc.

14.

Slater & West, Inc.

15.

Malibu Homes, Inc.

16.

HSRF Trust


1) HSR Freight line, Inc. This company will handle all services for use of track time and trainstrain sets s for Freight. And freight and provide freight forwarding services.services , for fee . For example HSR Freight Line, Inc. intends to offer high speed rail, freight forwarding and parcel handling services to existing national and global carriers. Carriers will be able to lease train sets with their trade logos and slogans in their own color schemes for fee schedule that varies depending on am, mid-day and pm time frames, in addition to toll fees for track time, similar to carriers paying tolls on turnpikes, for the faction of the cost as opposed to independently developing a freight corridor. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).

2) HSR Passenger Services, Inc. This company will handle all ticketing , booking, reservations , food services. Hotel& beverage services , . h H otel booking and car rentalsrental s booking services. HSR Passenger Service Inc. will offer concession space at the travel plazas, technology parks and develop motels, hotels, fast food restaurant establishments and convenience stores. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).

3) HSR Technologies, Inc.  This company will handle all build to suitessuit es and manufacturing facilities for train sets of trains and rail tracks and centralized signalization services along the rail road tracks and train stations. Within the technology parks HSR Technologies, Inc. will be to sole provider of all fiber optics, telecommunication and all related technologies services including the equipment maintainers.maint enance ainers .

A.

Maintenance for train engines , and rail cars and rail track through a maintenance agreement. agreement with equipment lease holders . And track maintenance.maintenance .

B.

Total maintenance for all Industrial sites for assembly plants , rail yards, train stations, train terminals, manufacturing plants, parts distribution centers, rail roads, rail crossings, rail yards, cargo terminals, parking lot, parking garages, hotel, motels, food and beverage vending machines, all retail shopping centers , and sites. Office o O ffice complexes and sites, and all on / and off site improvements.

C.

The airline industry is congested throughout existing terminal space. The proposed KSJM International Airport in Alabama will offer services to eliminate burden on existing terminal space for airline carriers. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certified inspection stations to service the airline industry. Also providing marine services, oil platforms and petro chemical industry services due to proximity to the Gulf of Mexico. Also Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and America Public Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specification inspection services for rail industry.


The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


4) HSR Logistics, Inc. This company will handle coordination, delivery and movement of all machinery equipment, material goods and will handle all purchasing for all of the Companys entities and also lease or buy all land for the Companys use, moves machinery and equipment, operate will operate all warehousing facilities at:

1) HSR Freight Line, Inc.

2) HSR Passenger Services, Inc.

3) HSR Technologies, Inc.

4) HSR Logistics, Inc.

5) KSJM International Airport, Inc.

6) Port of Ostia, Inc.

7) Port of De Claudius, Inc.

8) Ameri Cement, Inc.

9) Lord Chauffeurs LTD.

10) Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc.

The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).

5) KSJM International Airport, Inc. This company is a master airport facility, it will provide four types of airport terminals and one foreigner airline inspection service terminals:terminals operated by HSR Technologies Inc. :

a)

Passenger Terminals. OperatedTerminals , o . O perated by HSR Passenger Services Inc. KSJM International Airport, Inc.Inc .

b)

Air Cargo Terminals. Terminals , . operated by Port of Ostia, Inc.

c)

Corporate Jet Center Terminal. OperatedTerminal , . o O perated by Lord Chauffeurs LTD

d)

Foreigner Airline.Airline , . FAA Inspectionsi I nspections maintenance Service Terminals. Operateds S ervice t T erminals . , O o perated by KSJM International Airport, Inc.

e)

f)

Domestic Airline FAA inspection maintenance service terminals, operated by HSR Technologies Inc.

g)

International Airport, Inc.

71The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


6) Port Of Ostia, Inc. This company handles all foreign and domestic Air Cargo and sportings upporting porting ground services such as freight forwarding services are provided by HSR Freight line, Inc. and air and ground logistics are provided by HSR Logistics, Inc. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


7) Port of De Claudius, Inc. This company handles all foreign and domestic inbound outbound sea container inland port operation and warehouse distribution center. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


8) Ameri Cement, Inc. This company handles all cement needs for building (357 miles four lane) Alabama Toll Road "ATFl and others future projects. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue)..


9) Lord Chauffeurs LID. This company operates all passenger ground transportation car service limo and taxi, as well as the corporate jet center. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


10) Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc. This company provides to all of above entities, electric, gas, water, sanitary sewer service, trash removal, cable TV, Dish network and ,internet service.service s . Petroleum products and service s will also be provided during and after construction, along with fuel services on the toll road, and all industrial and tech nology parks , including the airport , and inland ports and incoming and andoutgoing vessels. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


11) Penn Insurance Services LLC. This company provides all insurance service s to all of about entities including the transportation division, homeowners insurance and risk management services for inbound outbound cargo.cargo all entities, but not limited to the entities . The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


12) Cape Horn Abstracting. This company provides all-land title examination services for all of the above entities to insure against any pre closing and post-closing claims of ownership or deed restriction. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


13) Eastern Development & Design, Inc. This company provides all civil engineering and architectural service s, with very strong cost control measures in place eliminating engineering and architectural cost over runs. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue). And services are fixed prices and about 16 of cost saving over traditional service provider.


14) Slater & West, Inc. This company provides contract administration services and handles all work force

human resource HR matters, also provides provid ing es background checks , and provides lose los s e prevention services, vendor invoice verification against goods and service provider s provide d, rverification services to clear invoice for payment. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


15) Malibu Homes, Inc. This company provides residential home building services. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface as provider for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface as a 25% shareholder (post construction operations revenue).


16) HSRF Trust. This company is a statuary trust administrator of private and public funds and safeguards the bondholder's interest. No money moves to any parties without trust authorization.


[s1a1201701_r1055.gif]



72



   

[s1a1201701_r1057.gif]


The Market


The Company believes that the United States suffers from an overburdened transportation infrastructure and that a fundamental overhaul of the dilapidated national transportation structure is needed according to Society of Civil Engineering reports (http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/ ). The Company anticipates that it will be able to assist in this fundamental overhaul by providing both the hands-on expertise and investment resources to establish an intermodal grid comprised of transportation and support services extending to urban and outlying areas alike.


The infrastructure experts believe that there is a compelling need to revitalize Americas transportation infrastructure. As all levels of government are facing increasing economic crisis, the Company anticipates that such revitalization will be the result of public-private partnerships and alliances to create the basis for developing such an infrastructure. Organizations, such as the Company, are accordingly poised to play a significant role in the redevelopment and improvement of the nations transportation infrastructure.


The 2009 David R. Goode National Transportation Policy Conference held at the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, outlined the compelling need to revitalize Americas transportation infrastructure and recommended that Public private partnerships need to emerge from the laboratory of pilot programs to play a much



73



larger role as a core element of Americas transport investment strategy. Organizations, such as the Company, are accordingly poised to play a significant role in the redevelopment and improvement of the nations transportation infrastructure. The same transportation conference also noted that, Lacking a coherent vision for our transportation future and chronically short of resources, we defer new investments, fail to plan, and allow existing systems to fall into disrepair. This shortsightedness and under investmentat the planning level and on our nations roads, rails, airports and waterwayscosts the country dearly. It compromises our productivity and ability to compete internationally; transportation users pay for the systems inefficiencies in lost time, money and safety. Rural areas are cut off from economic opportunities and even urbanites suffer from inadequate public transportation options. Meanwhile, transportation-related pollution exacts a heavy toll on our environment and public health.


Furthermore, the conference report was equally insistent on the need for private sector funding. In Recommendation 8: Connecting the Dots, the co-chairs wrote: Resolving the controversy over private equity contributions to the transport system is essential to meet the nations pressing transportation challenges, as is recognizing the appropriate role of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in taking on those challenges. They added, PPPs need to emerge from the laboratory of pilot programs to play a much larger role as a core element of Americas transport investment strategy.


To resolve this crisis will require a massive infusion of capital. The National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission, in its 2009 report Paying Our Way estimates the total shortfall between what is required and what is available, at all levels of government, just for maintaining the current system range from $134 billion to $194 billion per year for the period 2008 to 2035. If the goal is to improve existing transportation systems, the shortfall is even larger: $189$262 billion per year over the same time period.


The main problem is that the funds to either maintain or improve existing transportation systems are simply not available from traditional sources. Taxpayers at all levels of government are loath to support any tax increases for infrastructure projects. New transportation systems are frequently discussed at all levels of government but the public funding for implementing such plans is usually non-existent.


The Company has met recently with Appalachian Regional Commission. Their region consists of 420 counties in 13 states, serving more than 25 million people. For more information see See Exhibit 10.17. Political pressure is increasing to find alternate transportation systems as the price of gas and environmental risk of drilling and using petroleum products rises. Highway maintenance is increasingly expensive as the price of materials and labor increases.  Highway congestion is an increasing urban problem. The Company presented a project as a total package thereby providing the municipalities with the complete overview and relieving it of the time and costs involved in studying the proposal, seeking pricing information and projecting results. In addition, the Company believes that it may be able to effect economies of scale by purchasing new and renovating existing equipment and facilities on an integrated regional basis rather than in fractured individual areas or small municipalities.  The project also creates many jobs in the areas that the facilities are located in.

The Non-Profit High speed Rail Facilities Inc., has been identified in House Resolution 948 of the 2016 Georgia Legislative Session. High speed rail will connect freight and passenger services from Georgia to Alabama and throughout Georgia. For more information see See Exhibit 10.14 .

The Company has met recently with Port of Freeport and Brazoria-Fort Bend Rail District, herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44,to expand the port operations along with passenger and freight rail. "Forecasts from the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts predict that the U.S. and Texas economies will rebound from the current recession (in terms of GSP and GDP), and grow at 2.6 percent and 3.37 percent, respectively, on average, per year between 2010 and 2035.  An efficient and well-maintained transportation system is vital to the states ability to remain economically competitive at home and abroad."

Boeing is expected to introduce 34,000 new airplanes in the next 15 years.See herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44TEMS, consultantsc C onsultants to the Company, hashasve met recently with authorities in Texas concerning a freight airport.  



74



Philadelphia, PA Governor Tom Wolf today announced his strategic plan for sustained management, maintenance, and development of the Port of Philadelphia. The governor emphasized his key priorities of investing in infrastructure, creating jobs, and keeping Pennsylvania economically competitive. See herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44. The Company has been in discussions with elected officials concerning expansion of the port.

Michigan Coast to Coast Passenger Rail Ridership and Cost Estimate Study, prepared by TEMS, consultants to the Company, is ready for design build upon funding being available. See herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44.

The New York - Washington Corridor is the highest ranking corridor in the US and is the only corridor that could be developed without or only limited government funds, according to a feasibility study prepared by TEMS, consultants to the Company. See herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44. As such, the corridor provides an operating cash flow that can pay back the 35 Billion capital cost from the fare box.

High Speed Rail Technologies Inc. to provide technology services of intellectual property use for the Company operations.  That will include composite rebar manufacturing plant and product for the Alabama Toll Way Facility and rail car technology for DMU (Diesel Multi Unit Technology) along with composite rail road ties. See herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44.

TEMS- Transportation Economics Management Systems, identified projects for the Company focus as part of the growth strategy.strategy . See herein incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K, dated 05/12/2016, as described in Exhibit 10.12 thru 10.44.10.44 .


The Company is facing solid growth for next 20 years or more. According to McKinsey Global Institute- The McKinsey Infrastructure Practice Report- January 2013; confirms that 57 to 67 trillion dollars of investment is need for infrastructure from 2013 to 2030. Due to robust infrastructure market and a tremendous back log of infrastructure projects on hand, along with anticipated projects identified by the Companys infrastructure projects consultants; TEMS, Inc. Management believes that market conditions warrants that the company reconsider its capital structure and in September 2014 it has amended its Certificate of Incorporation increase its authorized shares. Market conditions were further supported by The Boeing Current Market Outlook 2012-2013 report which shows an 80 % growth over next 20 years for cargo fleet.


Entry of the Company into the Market


The Company anticipates that it can offer a comprehensive, innovative approach to resolving the nations transportation crisis. And it proposes doing so without the necessity of the government increasing taxes at any level, or in any manner. In short, the Company suggests replacing public financing with private funding.


The primary competitive barrier most companies face in attempting to impact the nations infrastructure crisis is that they approach the overall problem in disparate segments. For example, one provider proposes building railroad cars, while another proposes laying tracks. A third is interested in depots, while a fourth focuses on accommodations. None bring a comprehensive plan for full-funding to the mix. On the other hand, the Company takes an intermodal approach to providing seamless service with a scale of economy. For example the high-speed rail plan will utilize existing rail rights-of-way to connect several metropolitan areas and states serving expanding populations.


The Company through related parties also foresees pursuing joint ventures with other industries related to the transportation industry. For example, HSR Technologies it is currently finalizing an arrangement with a major manufacturer of certain materials used in the construction of highways and other transportation systems. The discussions contemplate a two-fold transaction by which the Company would initially buy the manufacturing plant and then subsequently purchase the remaining non-cash assets of the company.




75



Competition


The Company may face significant competition from other companies that may be developing competing transportation systems.  The Company will, however, face competition in the allocation of monetary resources from governmental agencies, at the local, regional, state and federal levels. The Company believes that government agencies will strongly endorse its proposed plan for high-speed regional rail systems, but believes that, given the economic environment, there may be few or no funds available for such development.


Nevertheless, as an example, traditionally significant competition generally exists in the industry, from government agencies and entities. Due to the federal budgetary constraints, henceforth any completion would come from private or public entities. On the heels of the Department of Transportations recent request for high-speed rail proposals, its Federal Railroad Administration received 132 applications from 32 states totaling $8.8 billion. That was more than three times the $2.4 billion available. During the first round of awards in the fall of 2009, applicants submitted more than $55 billion in project proposals. That was nearly six times the initial $8 billion available from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Unfortunately, due to federal budgetary setbacks, as of 2016, very little of this has come to fruition.


Trading Market


While there currently is no market for the shares, a market maker has filed the initial Form 15c2-11 with FINRA.


Employees


In addition to the Chief Executive Officer, the Company has been accruing salaries for a few paid employees and approximatelyhas twenty six other persons who are working on behalf of the Company to assist in the development of its initial high-speed rail project. None of thesethe twenty six se people currently receive salaries or other compensation. Paid Certain employees salaries are being accrued. The Company has also issued stock to employeesindividuals, for their consulting and professional services. At the time the Company launches its planned IPO, the Company will pay the accrued salaries to the these employees.


Subsidiaries


The Company has one subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure Inc. (GTI) incorporated in the state of Delaware. GTI is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company owns 25% of each of the companies listed in the section Related Companies.  


Reports to Security Holders


The Company is a reporting company pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and files with the Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly, annual, periodic and other reports.  The Company intends to deliver a copy of its annual report to its security holders, and will voluntarily send a copy of the annual report, including audited financial statements, to any registered shareholder who requests.  The Companys documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be inspected at the Commissions principal office in Washington, D.C. Copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference rooms. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. All of the Companys filings may be located under the CIK number 0001534155.

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS


The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware and merged with ARMT 2010 on June 12, 2012.  References to the financial condition and performance of the Company below in this section Managements Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation are to financial statements of the Company.




76



Discussion of Period Ended July 31, 2016


For the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company had total operating expenses of $7,778,084 and a net loss of $7,791,722.


Related Party Note


As of July 31, 2016, $960,967 is due to the majority shareholder (2015 $528,552), of which $508,531 is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand and $11,829 is past due with an interest rate of 3%, $57,767 is due December 31, 2016, with an interest rate of 3%, $95,600 was due on October 26, 2016 with an interest rate of 2%, and $107,240 is due on March 1, 2017 with an interest rate of 7% and $180,000 is due on demand, with an interest rate of 4%.  At July 31, 2016, accrued interest on this loan is $14,068 (2015 - $506).  

Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.


Since its incorporation, the Company has developed its business plan, appointed officers and directors, engaged initial project consultants and entered into negotiations and contracts for related and ancillary business. The Company is in the process of developing proposals for high-speed rail service.

From conception to present ARMT (the Company) has contractually secured the Alabama Toll Project with Alabama Toll Facilities Inc.

·

Currently in a design phase for road and bridges.

·

Multi-Unit rail cars.

·

Secured the technology to manufacture railroad ties.

·

Relco for manufacturing train sets PRIVATE  LABEL "AMERI METRO " TRAIN SETS BUILD IN AMERICA BY AMERICAN COMPANY

·

Secured the technology to manufacture composite Rebar. (C RB).

·

Secured NASDAQ Trading the T t rading symbol ARMT

·

Successfully Merged with public company

·

Secured the technology to manufacture composite debar.

Company is engaged in development of transportation complex which consist of toll road, inland port and airport.

1.

Toll road secured the construction contract to build 35735 7 7 miles of toll road (ATFI).

2.

Design built inland port called Port De Claudius.

3.

Design built airport called Sarah Jewel Mathias International Airport (KSJM).

4.

Design built air cargo port called Port of Ostia.

5.

Design built railroad and train stations.


Since its inception, the Company has engaged Eastern Development and Design (ED&D) to do all the civil engineering work for the toll road, Port De Claudius, KSJM and Port of Ostia. ED&D is an experienced civil engineering company that has been operating since 1993. The Company has, via ED&D, engaged Armstrong

Consulting Inc., for the airport engineering and planning. Armstrong Consulting Inc. is an experienced airport planning and engineer design company. It will engineer and design standards from FAA AC150/5300-13 airport design and FAR PART 77. The Company has approached Boeing Aircraft Manufacturer to help launch air cargo operation at KSJM and Port of Ostia. Boeing has indicated that the Company should



77



move forward with its business plan. The Company has engaged HSR Technologies/Relco to provide exclusive use of DMU rail technologies and use its know-how for manufacturing of train sets meeting the 49 CFR Part 238 compliant DMU in current venue service that meets or exceeds new Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and America Public Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specification. Relco is a fifty year old company and has provided services for Union Pacific, CSXT, VNSF, KCS, CN and numerous others. The Company will build seventeen hundred miles of railroad tracks in parallel with ATFI. The Company will build four tracks north and south bound, two tracks for passengers services and two tracks for freight. The Company has engaged Volkmann Railroad Builders to construct the design built railroad. Volkmann is a thirty five year old company that has built railroads for NASA, the mining industry, oil and gas exploration and freight carriers. The Company has engaged consultants such as Transportation Economics Management System Inc. (TEMS). TEMS is a global transportation consulting firm. It is responsible for the transportation planning and system analysis, which includes the development of the passenger and freight forecasting models. The Company has engaged with Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS) to manage and act as port agent at Port Claudius and Port Of Ostia. ISS is a global operation from 65 counties, six hundred ports that directs traffic from sea and air cargo to and from the ports. They have been in business since 1875. The Company has engaged NP&G Innovations Inc. to manufacturer railroad ties for the company. NP&G is the original inventors of green technology railroad ties.

The Company has engaged HRS Technologies/Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) to manufacture the composite rebar. MCT is the original developer of technology of the composite rebar. The Company will need approximately four hundred million linear feet of composite rebar to be use in building ATFI.

Project financing via bond

There are four non-profiting organizations:

1.

ATFI

2.

High Speed Rail Facilities Inc.

3.

High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc.

4.

Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority


High-Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. , and High-Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. and Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority take a comprehensive, intermodal approach to resolving the nations transportation crisis. And they propose doing so without the necessity of increasing taxes at any level, or in any manner. In short, they replace pubic financing with private funding.

High-Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. , and High-Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. and Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority are prepared to assume a much larger role with the Company. Having brought together the necessary technical and industrial components to begin work immediately, the Company need not engage in costly, time-consuming pilot programs. Our team of experts is prepared to move expeditiously forward on the widest variety of fronts, from site selection, to trainset construction, to building cooperative ventures with ancillary components of the transportation and accommodation industries nationwide. The Company takes an intermodal approach to providing seamless service with a scale of economy. Specifically, the Companys paradigm anticipates a fundamental change in the manner in which passenger rail service will be provided. The high-speed rail plan will utilize existing rail rights-of-way to connect several metropolitan areas and states serving expanding populations. The major elements of the plan would include:

·

Use of existing rail rights-of-way to connect rural, small urban and major metropolitan areas;

·

Operation of a "hub-and-spoke" passenger rail system providing service to and through one or more major hubs to locations throughout the United States;

·

Introduction of modern trail equipment operating at speeds up to 110 mph;

·

Provision of multi-modal connections to improve system access;

·

Improvement in reliability and on-time performance;



78



·

Development or expansion of a feeder bus system linking outlying areas to railroad stations;

·

Acquiring new train equipment including train sets, including spares;

·

Communications Systems, and grade-crossing improvements;

·

Construction or improvement of railroad grade crossings and passenger stations. High-Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. and The High-Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. are currently finalizing an arrangement with the Company.

The Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to change its existing authorized preferred and common shares from the current shares to the following:

Preferred Shares: 200,000,000 (Two hundred Million) par value .000001.

Class A 7,000,000 (Seven  Million Class A common shares) these shares have 1000 : 1 voting right compared to all other Class of shares and have equal dividend rights as all other Class of  shares, par value .000001.

Class B 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class B common shares) with voting and dividend rights, par value .000001.

Special purpose share:P p urpose s S hare s :

As described below the class C and or class D shares are special purpose shares . in addition to purposes stated below company , t The c C ompany intend s to utilize mechanism to purchase private activesactiv ity bonds es and infrastructure bonds as part of the Companys services .



In the event the investment opportunity becomes available to the Company, as an investor or joint venture partner to the affiliate or Non-affiliate Company or companies projects, then it is in the best interest of the Company, to purchase the private activity bonds or infrastructure bonds. The Company will buy the bonds by offering for sale, class C or D shares to investors, for project specific investments. The issuer of bonds are affiliate or non-affiliate company or companies, not ARMT.  

Benefit to the parties:

a.

The Company will hold back onto itself a quarter of a percent of the stated annual interest rate on the bonds and distribute the balance of the stated annual interest rate on the bonds to the investors of class C shares. As an example the bonds may offer a 3% rate return and the Company will hold back .25% unto itself. The quarter of a percent held back is in the interest of the Company. The Company will exchange class C and D shares for the bonds and will enjoy the performing asset of the bond rate of return. In addition too, the Company will enjoy the profit sharing shown under the class C example.

b.

To the class C shareholders they will benefit from the bond rate percentage in addition to the profit sharing of the project as outlined as an example in the Class C table. The class D shareholders will benefit from profit sharing of the project as outlined as an example in the Class D table.

Identifying risk factors for class C and or D shares:

a.

In the event the investment opportunity becomes available to the Company for issuing class C and or D shares to purchase bonds, as an investor or joint venture partner to the affiliate or non-affiliate company or companies projects, the class C and or D shareholders prospectus or memorandum of offering, for each specific project, will identify risk factors, including the creditor and stakeholders priority position in the event of bankruptcy.

The investor of class C and or D shares, also have the choice to invest in class B shares if the investors choose to do so.  However, investors of class C and or D shares are isolated investors from the overall ARMT operations.

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of ARMT dated September 14, 2014 with the State of Delaware, Secretary of State, Division of Corporations, Under Article Four declares the following:

The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in series and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.

 

            The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:

 

A.                 The number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;

 

B.                 The dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and, if so, from what date or dates, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of that series;

 

C.                 Whether that series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

 

D.                Whether that series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

 

E.                 Whether or not that series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates;

 



79



F.                 Whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of shares of that series, and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

 

G.                The rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of the shares of that series; and

 

H.                Any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.



This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of theT the   State of Delaware. All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect. For more information see Exhibit 10. 58.


ClassC C lass C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class C common shares) with no voting rights but with dividend rights, par value $.000001. Company may issue these shares as it deems necessary, for the purposes including but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.

Issuing of Class C shares:Company for the purpose of the offering anticipates issuing of   Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shares.

Company anticipates that it will issue shares to purchasing goods and services for ARMT; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects. Collectively called the investment activities  

The Company has entered into an Agreement with HSRF Trust, a statutory as asset manager for fee HSRF Trust will hold shares for the company and will release to the market per the direction of the company.

Dividend payment policy: ARMT anticipate 23% of the  net profits  from the activities  of investment by  issuing ofclass C a/k/a equity participation dividend shares EPDS shares. Upon issuing of shares for the following purpose:

 Shares are serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate. Issuing of such shares is called the investment activities.  

Upon issuing of shares for the above purpose ARMT anticipate 23% of the net profits from the investment activities. Company will set aside 16% of the 23% net profits to the benefit of the Class Cshareholders AND retain 7% onto itself AND 6% of the 16% will be held for future investments for the EPDS shareholders and 10% will be distributed as dividend to Class Ca/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shareholders.  Class Ca/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shareholders will receive 10% profit sharing from 6% investment pool over time.



Voting rights:Class Ca/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDSshareshave no voting rights

ARMT Class "C" Shares Illustration

 

 

 

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline

 


 

$27,000,000,000

Class C shares Purchased

 

 

$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



 

$5,000,000,000

 



 



Est.  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%

$1,890,000,000

 

 

 

 


ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

 

$472,500,000

Net profit off project


 

 

$1,417,500,000

77% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

 

 

 

$1,091,475,000

23% 0f Net profit for Class C Shareholders and ARMT

 

 

 

$326,025,000

Dividend to Class C Shareholders  @ 2.75%  over 30 years

 

 

 

$4,125,000,000

23% Net Profit breakdown

 

 

 

16% 0f the 23% Net profit for benefit of Class C Shareholder and ARMT

 

69% of net profit

$224,957,250

ARMT 7% of 23% Net profits

31% of net profit

$101,067,750

Class C Shareholders profit sharing  is 10% of 16%

 

63% net profit for benefit

$141,723,068

 6 % of 16% profit sharing is held for reinvestment

 

37% net profit for benefit

$83,234,183

Earnings on remaining 6% @ 5% growth over 30 years

 

 

 

$87,395,892

10% Class C Shareholders Distribution of earnings and growth over 30 years

 

 

 

$8,739,589

90% of earnings and growth held for protection of investors

$78,656,302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C ROI

4,275,462,657

 

 

 

Principal

5,000,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C distributions over 30 years


9,275,462,657

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

over 30 years accumulated


185.51%

 

 

per year over 30 years

6.18%

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

ARMT return

$573,567,750

 

 

over 30 years accumulated

11.47%

 

 

 

 

0.38%

 

 

 

 

 



Retainage Fund

$78,656,302


Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class D common shares) with no voting rights and no dividend rights, par value $.000001. Company may issue these shares as its currency as it deems necessary, for the following purposes but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.


Issuing of Class D shares:Class Da/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS” “D common shares): Company for the purpose of the offering anticipates issuing of   Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPSa/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPS shares.


Company anticipates that it will issue shares to purchasing goods and services for ARMT; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; The Company has entered into an Agreement with HSRF Trust, a statutory as asset manager for fee. HSRF Trust will hold shares for the company and will release to the market per the direction of the Company.


Dividend Payment Policy: ARMT anticipate Issuing of Class D shareswill yield30% of the net profits from the investment activities.  Company will set aside 23% of net profits to the benefit of the Class D shareholders. And retain 7% of 30 % onto itself and 23% will be held for future investments for the shareholder, 23% reserves from the activities of investment held for future investments for the shareholder is equity appreciation.


ARMT Class "D" Shares Illustration

 

 


 

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline

 


 


$27,000,000,000

Class D shares Purchased

 

 

 


$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



 


$5,000,000,000

 



 




Est  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%


$1,890,000,000

 

 

 

 



ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

 

 

 


$472,500,000

Net profit off project


 

 


$1,417,500,000

70% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

 

 

 


$992,250,000

30 % 0f Net profit for Class D Shareholders and ARMT

 

 

 


$425,250,000

30 % Net Profit breakdown

 

 

 



23 % 0f the 30 % Net profit for benefit of Class D Shareholder

 

77% of net profit

 


$327,442,500

ARMT 7% of 30 % Net profits

 

23 % of net profit

 


$97,807,500

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Class D ROI


327,442,500

 

 

 

Principal


5,000,000,000

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Class D distributions over 30 years



5,327,442,500

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

over 30 years accumulated



106.55%

 

 

per year over 30 years

 


3.55%

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

ARMT return


$570,307,500

 

 

over 30 years accumulated

 


11.41%

 

 

 

 


0.38%

Note: Class D Shareholders will enjoy 100% of growth on their 23% of net profits

The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in series and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. 

The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:

A.

The number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;

B.

The dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and, if so, from what date or dates, and the  relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of that series;

C.

Whether that series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

D.

Whether that series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

E.

Whether or not that series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates;



80



F.

Whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of shares of that series, and , if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

G.

The rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of the shares of that series; and

H.  Any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.


1.

This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

2.

All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect.

 Issuing of Class C shares: Company for the purpose of the offering anticipates issuing of   Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shares.

Company anticipates that it will issue shares to purchasing goods and services for ARMT; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects. Collectively called the investment activities  

The Company has entered into an Agreement with HSRF Trust, a statutory as asset manager for fee HSRF Trust will hold shares for the company and will release to the market per the direction of the company.

Dividend payment policy: ARMT anticipate 23% of the  net profits  from the activities  of investment by  issuing of  class C a/k/a equity participation dividend shares EPDS shares. Upon issuing of shares for the following purpose:

 Shares are serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate. Issuing of such shares is called the investment activities.  

Upon issuing of shares for the above purpose ARMT anticipate 23% of the net profits from the investment activities. Company will set aside 16% of the 23% net profits to the benefit of the Class C shareholders AND retain 7% onto itself AND 6% of the 16% will be held for future investments for the EPDS shareholders and 10% will be distributed as dividend to Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shareholders.  Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shareholders will receive 10% profit sharing from 6% investment pool over time.

81



  Voting rights: Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shares have no voting rights

ARMT Class "C" Shares Illustration

 

 

 

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline

 


 

$27,000,000,000

Class C shares Purchased

 

 

$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



 

$5,000,000,000

 



 



Est.  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%

$1,890,000,000

 

 

 

 


ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

 

$472,500,000

Net profit off project


 

 

$1,417,500,000

77% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

 

 

 

$1,091,475,000

23% 0f Net profit for Class C Shareholders and ARMT

 

 

 

$326,025,000

Dividend to Class C Shareholders  @ 2.75%  over 30 years

 

 

 

$4,125,000,000

23% Net Profit breakdown

 

 

 

16% 0f the 23% Net profit for benefit of Class C Shareholder and ARMT

 

69% of net profit

$224,957,250

ARMT 7% of 23% Net profits

31% of net profit

$101,067,750

Class C Shareholders profit sharing  is 10% of 16%

 

63% net profit for benefit

$141,723,068

 6 % of 16% profit sharing is held for reinvestment

 

37% net profit for benefit

$83,234,183

Earnings on remaining 6% @ 5% growth over 30 years

 

 

 

$87,395,892

10% Class C Shareholders Distribution of earnings and growth over 30 years

 

 

 

$8,739,589

90% of earnings and growth held for protection of investors

$78,656,302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C ROI

4,275,462,657

 

 

 

Principal

5,000,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C distributions over 30 years


9,275,462,657

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

over 30 years accumulated


185.51%

 

 

per year over 30 years

6.18%

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

ARMT return

$573,567,750

 

 

over 30 years accumulated

11.47%

 

 

 

 

0.38%

 

 

 

 

 



Retainage Fund

$78,656,302


Issuing of Class D shares: Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS” “D common shares):Company for the purpose of the offering anticipates issuing of   Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPSa/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPS shares.


Company anticipates that it will issue shares to purchasing goods and services for ARMT; for engaging in longtermlong term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; The Company has entered into an Agreement with HSRF Trust, a statutory as asset manager for fee. HSRF Trust will hold shares for the company and will release to the market per the direction of the Company.


ARMT Class "D" Shares Illustration

 

 


 

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline

 


 


$27,000,000,000

Class D shares Purchased

 

 

 


$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



 


$5,000,000,000

 



 




Est  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%


$1,890,000,000

 

 

 

 



ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

 

 

 


$472,500,000

Net profit off project


 

 


$1,417,500,000

70% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

 

 

 


$992,250,000

30 % 0f Net profit for Class D Shareholders and ARMT

 

 

 


$425,250,000

30 % Net Profit breakdown

 

 

 



23 % 0f the 30 % Net profit for benefit of Class D Shareholder

 

77% of net profit

 


$327,442,500

ARMT 7% of 30 % Net profits

 

23 % of net profit

 


$97,807,500

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Class D ROI


327,442,500

 

 

 

Principal


5,000,000,000

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Class D distributions over 30 years



5,327,442,500

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

over 30 years accumulated



106.55%

 

 

per year over 30 years

 


3.55%

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

ARMT return


$570,307,500

 

 

over 30 years accumulated

 


11.41%

 

 

 

 


0.38%

Note: Class D Shareholders will enjoy 100% of growth on their 23% of net profits


Dividend Payment Policy: ARMT anticipate Issuing of Class D shares will yield 30% of the net profits from the investment activities.  Company will set aside 23% of net profits to the benefit of the Class D shareholders.Andshareholders. And retain 7% of 30 % onto itself and 23% will be held for future investments for the shareholder, 23% reserves from the activities of investment held for future investments for the shareholder is equity appreciation.

Voting rights:shares :Class Da/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS (D common shares)  shares havenohave no voting rights and no dividend rights30% of the net profits from the activities of investment held for future investments  for the shareholder is equity appreciation as described above the classC and class D sharesare special purposes shares in addition to purposes stated above company intend to utilize mechanism to issues shares to accredited investors the proceeds from the sale of class C and or class D shares will be used to purchase private activities and public infrastructure bonds.  Companys recent 8K filing shows that $509 billion dollars in parallel infrastructure bonds on record.  

For example:

Shares are serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible itemsforitems for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate. Issuing of such shares is called the investment activities.  

Issuing of Class C sharesa/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shares. Company may issues service of class C shares with project pacific designation in the offering memorandum or prospectus. Under the Dividend payment policy the net profits from the joint venture investment activities in the bond will pay 2.75 % annual (Annual rate to be set by the company in the class C memorandum(s) of offering or prospectus(s)   payable every 90 days to the project pacific class C series of shares to the investors

 In addition to the joint venture benefits, company will set aside 16% of the 23% net profits to the benefit of the Class Cshareholders. AND retain 7% onto itself AND 6% of the 16% will be held for future investments for the EPDS shareholders and 10% will be distributed as dividend to Class Ca/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shareholders in addition to receiving dividend form the set aside 16% of the 23%  net profits to the benefit of the Class Cshareholders. And

And Stock redemption policy for class C and D:

As noted above class C and D share are referred to as Special purpose shares in the event the shares are used to purchase privet actives and public infrastructures bonds or ancillary development bonds shares are retired and surrender to the company at same time as the retirements of the bonds. The redemption clause will be set in memorandum or offering documents.

Issuance of Bonds and benefit to the Company:

a.

Benefit to the company is that its customer is funded by the bond and the company will not have to carry the debt to finance the project. Therefore, the payment for its work is guaranteed.

b.

Company anticipates to purchase bonds with class C and D share sales. There are 506 billion dollars of bonds that are available for purchase.  Assuming Company executes on its vision, to purchase the bonds and that said bonds having an interest rate of 3% annually, the Company offers the return to the class C and D shareholders.  The interest distribution being 2.75 % to Class C and D shareholders and .25% to the Company, together with other distribution clauses as stated above.  The company will own the bonds reflecting on its financial statements as cash flow/assets. In essence the potential $509 billion dollars worth of assets will be available to the Company, in exchange for the class C and D shares.Such assets will be utilized in the execution of our main business plan,the development of transportation facilities, including but not limited to high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related and ancillary transportation businesses, inland ports, sea ports, airports, and toll roads.

85

Infrastructure Market:

Globally, according to the McKinsey report, there is a $57 Trillion dollar market in infrastructure.  In the last10last 10 years the USA has fallen to the 17th ranking in the world as opposed to number one. The Bond Markets are strong for infrastructure projects, as states continue to look for PPP (Private Public Partnerships) to finance projects.  Company has positioned itself to bridge the gap.


Other Related Party Agreements


Shah Mathias, founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company Founder of the Company , has established a series of corporations with which to effect the transactions and development of the projects envisioned by the Company including the Port Trajan Facility, high speed rail projects and the Alabama Toll Road.  The Company has envisioned long-range ideas and plans todevelopto develop currently undeveloped areas through which the planned Alabama toll road will traverse. These plans include the development of an airport, sea shipping port and a high speed rail line.


Although these companies are not subsidiaries of the Company, they are related companies as they are allunderall under common control of Mr. Mathias.  Mr. Mathias has established these companies to basically serve as subcontractors for the operations of the planned transportation systems.

 

None of these companies has any operations or any revenues. Mr. Mathias (as president of each of these companies) has executed contracts between several of these companies and the Company. In each of thesecompanies,these companies, Shah Mathias is the president and chief executive officer. No other officers or directors exist in any of these related companies. The Company owns 25% ownership interest, non-voting, non-controlling shareholder interest, of each of the companies with the remaining ownership held directly or indirectly by Mr. Mathias.


1) HSR Freight line, Inc. Designed to handle all services for use of track time and trains for freight and freight forwarding services.

2) HSR Passenger Services, Inc. Designed to handle rail ticketing booking, reservations, and food services.

3) HSR Technologies, Inc. Designed to handle all building of suites and manufacturing of trains and rail tracks and provide fiber optics, telecommunications, and related technologies services.

4) HSR Logistics, Inc. Designed to handle all purchasing functions.

5) KSJM International Airport, Inc. Designed to eventually create an airport facility in inland Alabama

6) Port Of Ostia, Inc. Designed to handle all air cargo if and when an airport facility is created.

7) Port of De Claudius, Inc. Designed to handle sea container and port operations.

 8) AMERI Cement, Inc. Designed to handle cement needs for building Alabama toll road.

9) Lord Chauffeurs LTD: Designed to operate all passenger ground transportation.

10) Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc. Designed to provide utility and maintenance service to above entities.

11) Penn Insurance Services LLC. Designed to provide insurance service to above entities.

12) Cape Horn Abstracting, Co. Designed to land title examination services.

13) Eastern Development & Design, Inc.  Designed to provide all civil engineering and architectural service.

14) Slater & West, Inc.  Designed to handle contract administration services and work force H R matters.

15) Malibu Homes, Inc. Designed to establish residential home building services.

16) Platinum Media, Inc. Designed to provide all media related services.


The Company has entered into Letter of Intents with several of the above related companies for its futureprojects.future projects. On January 13, 2013 the Company entered into a Letter of Intent, which was later turned into an agreement, with a related party.  The purpose being that the Company is contracting services for the build out of the Port Trajan 5 Terminals.




86


The following discussion is contingent on subsequent financing being obtained.

On August 8, 2016, Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement for construction (Construction Agreement) with Port De Claudius, Inc. (PDC). Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the Company shall perform all tasks and actions required to develop and construct the Port Trajan Pa. commercial properties (the Project) and to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering, and related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project. Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the specifications, designs, construction standards, subcontractor agreements, insurance requirements, hiring and employment policies and similar items shall be developed by the Company, subject to approval by PDC. The Company shall assure that the Project is constructed according to specifications and requirements imposed by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PADOT) and the Federal Highway Administration. The Company shall supervise all phases of the construction of the Project, and it shall be responsible to PDC for all acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, agents, consultants and other parties under its control. The Company shall be responsible for assuring that the construction of the Project is performed in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the highest standards of care for the industry.

The Project consists of two phases, phase one closing to take place on or before September 21, 2016 (Phase One) and phase two to take place on or before August 31, 2017. Phase One consists of land purchase andonsiteand onsite /off site improvement and its estimated cost, for both phases, is Two Billion Dollars ($2,000,000 ,000), at cost plus forty percent (40%), plus two percent (2%) for the increase in inflation regardless of the cost to the Company to perform the required services. In no event will the profit to the Company from the amount paid by PDC be less than Eight Hundred Million Dollars ($800,000,000). A mobilization fee of $2,729,514 shall be due and payable by PDC to the Company upon the closing of Bond funding for Phase One.

On September 11, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement of sale and or assignment of assets in Phase One (the Sale Agreement) with Jewel's Real-Estate 10-86 Master LLLP (the Seller), Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc., division of Hi Speed Rail Facilities Inc. (the Financier), PDC, and HSRF Statutory Trust as Trustee (the "Trustee"), as dictated by the Construction Agreement. The Sale Agreement was thereafter amended on September 13, 2016, in order to change the closing date of the transaction to October 14, 2016. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement, the Company and the Seller shall sell and assign all rights, title and interest in and to any contractual agreements to PDC on completion of Phase One, as governed by the Construction Agreement. The cost of Phase One is $950,000,000. The net Phase One revenue to the Company is $66,719,514

On September 21, 2016, the closing of the transaction took place.

Going Concern


The Company has negative working capital and has not yet received revenues from sales of products or services. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company generating cash from the sale of its common stock and/or obtaining debt financing and attaining future profitable operations.  


Managements plans include selling its equity securities and obtaining debt financing to fund its capital requirement and on-going operations; however, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in these efforts. These factors create substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.


Critical Accounting Policies


The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The preparation of these financial statements requires making estimates and judgments that



87


affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  The estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.


The Company believes that the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements:

Controls and Procedures


We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of October 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.   

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. To address the material weaknesses, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure our consolidated financial statements included in this registration statement have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.   

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The framework our management uses to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on our evaluation under the framework described above, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of October 31, 2016, due to the same material weaknesses that rendered our disclosure controls and procedures ineffective. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is not effective due to a lack of sufficient resources to hire a support staff in order to separate duties between different individuals. The Company lacks the appropriate personnel to handle all the varying recording and reporting tasks on a timely basis. The Company plans to address these material weaknesses as resources become available by hiring additional professional staff, as funding becomes available, outsourcing certain aspects of the recording and reporting functions, and separating responsibilities. We have identified the following material weaknesses.   

1.

As of October 31, 2016, we did not maintain effective controls over the control environment. Specifically, we have not developed and effectively communicated to our employees the accounting policies and procedures. This has resulted in inconsistent practices.



2.

As of October 31, 2016, we did not maintain effective controls over financial statement disclosure. Specifically, controls were not designed and in place to ensure that all disclosures required were originally addressed in our financial statements. Accordingly, management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

  Because of these material weaknesses, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in "INTERNAL CONTROL-INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK" issued by the COSO.

Change In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This registration statement does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only managements report in this registration statement.

Use of Estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Revenue recognition


The Company has commenced its revenue producing operations. The Company has yet to realize significant revenues from operations.operations . The Company recognizes revenues when delivery of goods or completion of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers, the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable is collection is reasonably assured.


Share-based payments


The Company may issue shares of common stock to employees and non-employees for services.  Stock basedStock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period.


The Company will estimate the fair value of stock options and warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the fair value of options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable.  This model requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility of the underlying stock and the expected life of stock options.  Projected data related to the expected volatility of stock options is based on the average volatility of the trading prices of comparable companies and the expected life of stock options is based upon the average term and vesting schedules of the options.  Changes in these subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair value of the estimate, and therefore the existing valuation models do not provide a precise measure of the fair value of our stock options and warrants.


The Company will estimate the fair value of shares of common stock issued for services based on the price of shares of the Companys common stock sold in contemporaneous private placements of offerings on the date shares are granted.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.


Discussion for the Fiscal Years Ended July 31, 2016 and 2015


Total assets of the Company were $41,023 as at July 31, 2016 as compared to total assets of $2,101 as at July 31, 2015.  Total current assets at July 31, 2016 was $35,838 as compared to current assets of $nil as at July 31, 2015.




88



Total operating expenses increased to $7,778,084 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016 from $5,228,813 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015.  The increase was due to additional accrual of directors fees and officer payroll and increases in professional fees during the year ended July 31, 2016. Loss from operations was $7,778,084 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016 compared to $5,228,813 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015.


Liquidity: The Company has no continuous methods of generating cash other than the sale of its stock.


Capital Resources: The Company did not incur any capital expenditures other than the purchase of office supplies and computer equipment.


Results of Operations: The Company completed no sales and received no revenues since inception other than from the sale of its securities. The Company does not anticipate that it will generate revenue sufficient to cover its operating expenses until the development of its business plan. As at July 31, 2016, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $16,319,435 and has accumulated losses of $21,850,223 since inception. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company generating cash from the sale of its common stock and/or obtaining debt financing and attaining future profitable operations.  Managements plans include selling its equity securities and obtaining debt financing to fund its capital requirement and on-going operations; however, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in these efforts. These factors create substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.







DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

 

The Companys offices are located at 2575 Eastern Blvd. York, Pennsylvania 17402. Its telephone number is (717) 434-0668. The Company has moved into these offices in February 2014.


LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

There are no threatened or pending legal actions against the Company or any of its directors / officers.

Statement by Mr. Mathias in reference to York Daily Record article dated July 12, 2012:

As to the press we all know how that goes they write as they feel what will sells .We all also know that in the court cases, courts do not always agree with you. Cases are turned over in your favor or against you, over technicalities not always over substance. We also know that when litigation starts they not only go after the business abut also others involved .Sometimes same case filings are done in multiple index such is the situation with me. My cases are more tied to my divorce that was filed on or about 2001 (divorce was finalized over 15 years ago).


One of the greatest assets I have, is my abilities to see the value in raw land and having the ability to create value; it has paid me well over the years but has also brought evenness and jealousy from all corners. Having said that, let me address each one of the opponents in the recent newspaper article dated July 12, 2012.

Truth of the matter is, some of those who stepped forward to share negative issue, are those I took a very strong standing with, for example Bill Anstine.  He is an attorney in the town I agreed to buy 400 acres of land from him/ his family. I agree to pay him in the amount of $1,800,000.00 for the farm subject to government approvals for the land development. His land did not meet the zoning for what I needed to develop it for. So I applied for zoning changes, it took forty-five (45) text amendments to the zoning ordinance and publicly held hearings. At the last and final public hearing, I was able to get through the hearing in my favor. In the final municipality hearing, the question was asked of my builder (end user) what kind of home are you planning to build, my builder boasted the types of homes he was going to build and he is paying me $14,000,000.00 for 75 acres of ground. Its was the ground that I had not yet bought from Attorney Bill Anstine that the Public hearing concluded in my favor in terms of zoning. The Builders testimony was heart burn to Mr. Anstine, seller refused to adhere to the terms and condition of our agreement. And he sued me to get out of the agreement to sell me the land and I counter sued him for $6,000,000. Events took place 13+/- years ago.

As to Mr. Thomas Cappello was summoned as defendant, in litigation as defendant in fraud litigation and  he and his named defendants, still owe my entities over $20,000,000.00. Claim is still open. Sale Events took place 11+/- years ago.

As to Mr. Smith from Fitz and smith, Inc. He is a site contractor and I dont easily roll over to site contactors. However I did not unjustly enrich myself from their work. The home builder that bought developments, went bankrupt and now Mr. Smith of Fitz and Smith is his running after me for his loses. Events took place more than 12 + years ago.

As to Mr. Milton, we agreed to buy land from his company in phases, so in the first phase I paid him $50,000 for the commercial lot. At closing, seating at the same table, with his agent, in the same room, same hour, I sold the lot to the end user for $200,000. Events took place 15 + years ago.

As to Mr. Dave Ken, My Company financed his non-conforming home loan. The Loan was sold out to another party, Events took place 15+ years ago.

The article sates judgements against the following entities in error , Jewel Real Estate, Slater & West, Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers, and PennDel Land Company. There are many misrepresentations within the article.

Risk factor: These dated claims and ligation matters tarnish the reputation of Mr. Mathias as an individual, however ARMT is not involved in any of these matters.




89



DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

 


The following table sets forth information regarding the members of the Companys board of directors and its executive officers as of November 1, 2016:


Name

Age

Position

Commencement Date

Debra Mathias

58

Director, CEO

21-Apr-14

Shah Mathias

58 [ ]

Founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company

2 Oct-14 [_________]

James Becker

55

Director, President

2-Oct-14

Steve Trout

58

Director, Secretary/Treasurer

12-Jun-12

Shahjahan C. Mathias

50

Director

12-Jun-12

Donald E. (Nick) Williams, Jr.

58

Director

12-Jun-12

Keith A. Doyle

56

Director

12-Jun-12

Robert Todd Reynold

55

Director

29-May-14

Suhail Matthias

57

Director

1-Sep-12

James Kingsborough

60

Director

19-May-14

J. Harold Hatchett III

55

Director, CFO

4-Aug-15

Ron Silberstein

59

Director, COO

4-Aug-15

John Thompson

70

Director, General Counsel

4-Aug-15

Robert Choiniere

61

Director (Independent)

19-Oct-16

Bryan Elicker

55

Director (Independent)

19-Oct-16

Joseph Hackett    

61

Director (Independent)

19-Oct-16




Comment 36

Shah Mathias, Founder / Head of - Merger & Acquisitions A New and Business Development.Development and non-Board Member President .  Mr. Mathias has an extensive background in real estate and property development.development , leading, Eastern Development and Design Inc., Jewel Real Estate 1089 Master Limited Partnership, Cape Horn Abstracting, Susquehanna Mortgage bankers Corp. (direct endorsement lender for HUD), Penndel Land Company . Beginning in 1988, Mr. Mathias commenced his career in real estate



90


with the personal acquisition and like-kind exchange sales of investment property. In 1992, Mr. Mathias started a mortgage-banking corporation , Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers Corp. underwriting loans under his own name and selling such loans on the open market. By 2000, Mr. Mathias company had underwritten more than $1 billion in loans. In 2002, Mr. Mathias started Penndel Land Co., a real estate company which now has substantial assets and property. Mr. Mathias received his education at Penn State Institute of Technology.


Debra A Mathias: Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director. Ms. Mathias has worked along with Mr. Mathias since 1986 and had held key executive positions in several of the companies over the years, including Mortgage-Banking, Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers Corp. as an officer overseeing administrative departments -Banking , Civil Engineering Eastern Development and Design Inc. , Title insurance company , Cape Horn Abstracting Land Development Company, Administrative andRegulatoryand Regulatory compliance department. Since 2010.2010 .  Ms. Mathias has worked behind the scenes for ARMTs Regulatory compliance division, the merger of Yellowwood Acquisitions and ARMT and addressing comments with SEC regulatory compliance department to bring the S1S - 1 registration statement effective.effective in 2013 .


James Becker, President and a Director. Mr. Becker is an experienced entrepreneur in the Pennsylvania area. In 1990, Mr. Becker purchased a partnership in a family style restaurant and in 1992 bought out his partner and added additional seating capacity. In 1997, he purchased a second restaurant and later sold both. In 2004, Mr. Becker became Vice President of Sales for Yorktowne Casket Company, a 14 state independent casket distributor company, where he managed the 34 sales representatives and oversaw its continued sales force. In 2007, Yorktowne Casket was sold to Matthews International.  Mr. Becker currently serves as a Regional Sales Manager for Matthews International where he manages an eight member sales force and personal accounts totaling $21 million in annual sales.  Mr. Becker brings his business knowledge and financial and personnel management skills to the Company. Mr. Becker will resign upon completion of this Registration Statements effectiveness .


Steve Trout, Secretary/Treasurer and a director. Mr. Trout has extensive experience in sales and marketing. Since 1997, he has handled all inside sales for Military and Commercial Fasteners Corporation, York, Pennsylvania. Prior to his employment with that company, Mr. Trout served as sales representative to several companies including MetLife and Dauphin Electric Supplies Co., both in Pennsylvania. Through his career Mr. Trout, has held account responsibility for over one hundred industrial accounts and increased sales to assigned industrial accounts substantially; prospected for and added new accounts and planned sales strategies for target accounts. Mr. Trout served as vice-chairman of Customer Service Committee, evaluated suggestions from coworkers and customers, created customer service survey and conducted interviews, compiled survey results and presented proposed improvements to company management. Mr. Trout received his M.B.A. degree from Syracuse University and his Bachelor of Business Administration from Pennsylvania State University.  Mr. Trout's business education and business experience provide the Company with a depth of expertise and business skills.


Shahjahan C. ("Chuck") Mathias, Executive Vice President and a director. Mr. Chuck Mathias is a recognized authority in the marketing of electrical utility power backup systems, with a long history of working with nuclear power generation facilities, communications companies, large data centers and manufacturers of Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS). Currently the Director of OEM Sales for C&D Technologies, he is responsible for having secured a $27 million contract with the government for the Minuteman Missile Launch System and increasing sales from $69 million to $83 million in a single 15-month period. In his earlier position as Utility Marketing Manager for Exide Corporation/EnerSys, Mr. Mathias was the Team Leader supporting government contract interface with the Air Force and the FAA. For the past five years, Mr. Mathias has worked in the sale and marketing design for power back up systems on an as needed basis.  Mr. Chuck Mathias is the brother of Shah Mathias , Founder of the Company.Company .  Mr. Mathias brings to the Company is knowledgeable and experienced with procuring government contracts, developing business strategies and working on complex and detailed projects.


Donald E. (Nick) Williams, Jr., an independent director. Mr. Williams has over 30 years of experience in Radiological Engineering, Environmental Safety and Health, Physics and Hazardous Material Management for both government and private industry in the U.S. and internationally. Mr. Williams holds a Bachelor of Science degree in biology from Providence College and a Master of Science degree in Radiological Sciences from the University of Massachusetts-Lowell. Over the first 10 years of his career in the nuclear industry, Mr. Williams work was centered in the areas of power reactor construction, operation, and maintenance. Over the last 20 years, his focus has turned to decommissioning major power reactors and nuclear weapons complex facilities in the United States and abroad. These tasks involved the



91



safe handling, packaging, and disposal of large quantities of radioactive and hazardous materials in accordance with stringent U.S. and international standards to ensure public and workforce safety. Mr. Williams has been a consultant to many utility companies (e.g. Exelon, Pacific Gas & Electric, British Nuclear), architect-engineers (e.g. Shaw, Westinghouse, CH2MHill), and government agencies (DOE, DOD). He was the owner of a private nuclear consulting firm with over 130 employees for 10 years, and currently holds the position of Director of Radiological Engineering for a large western U.S. company.  Mr. Williams provides the Company with a strong background in regulatory compliance, government contracts and public health and safety.  Mr. Williams will be instrumental in assisting in the development of the railroad and highway projects and dealing with environmental and waste issues.


Keith A. Doyle, a director.  Since 1995, Mr. Doyle has served as CEO and President of The Doyle Group, LTD, York, Pennsylvania, an unfranchised development company.  From 1983 to 1995, Mr. Doyle was a realtor in York County, Pennsylvania, was a multi-million dollar producer and served as President of the Board of Realtors of York County, Pennsylvania.


Suhail Matthias, a director. Mr. Matthias is the founder and CEO of Diamond Carriages, Ltd., a chauffeuringcompanychauffeuring company started with a single taxi in 2002 and developed into a limousine service in Central London. Diamond Carriages is now listed among the top five limousine services by the popular United Kingdom reference site Zettai.


James D. Kingsborough, a director. Mr. Kingsborough is a graduate of Shippensburg University BSBA degree, majored in marketing and graduated 1979. He worked for several roofing companies with responsibilities ranging from technical, to architectural calls, to sales representative. In 1991 he started Kingsborough & Associates.  Over the years he became partner is Division 7 Roof Spec. Currently he is a partner in Division 7 Roof Spec and Exterior Building Solutions LLC.  They are manufacturers representatives for several companies mostly in the commercial roofing market and some residential and cover from Altoona PA to Atlantic City NJ.  Mr. Kingsborough is also a partner in Business Airport of Carlisle, Inc.  The Carlisle Airport is a private owned, public use airport with about 60 based aircraft.


Robert Todd Reynold, Chief Risk Officer and a director. Mr. Reynold has over 33 years experience as an entrepreneur.  Over the first fifteen years, Mr. Reynold successfully built a real estate construction company in the residential and commercial market place, with sales totaling more than $2 million dollars.  He then purchased a site excavation and paving Construction Company performing work in new road construction, private and government projects.  During the last 18 years, Mr. Reynold successfully built a national sales organization in the insurance market place covering 38 states successfully writing over $15 million in premium.  He also has experience guiding large private and public firms in the setting up of Captive Insurance programs for their benefit.   


J Harold Hatchett III, Chief Financial Officer and a director.  Mr. Hatchett has worked for several major corporations such as Royal Dutch Shell, Bertelsmann Music Group, Aetna and Heritage Inks International (a Citicorp Venture Capital company) over his 30+ year career.  He has recently served as Group Managing Partner and CFO for OCTCET Inc., from August 2012 to present.  Mr. Hatchett served a Shell CFO of Upstream Americas, from April 2011 to May 2012; Shell COO Business Services, UK, from April 2000 to July 2003.  Shell VP Investor Relations Americas, from October 2003 to June 2011; and Shell VP External Engagement Strategy, from July 2011 to April 2012.  Mr. Hatchett serves on the Executive Advisory Board of the School of Business and Economics at North Carolina A&T University and Longwood University.  He is a Board of Directors member of the Executive Leadership Council.  Also, he is a former Board of Directors member of Affinity Health Plan in NY and served as Treasurer.  He is a graduate of Longwood University, BS Finance & Accounting.


Ron Silberstein, Chief Operating Officer and a director.  Mr. Silberstein, a Certified Public Accountant and a Certified Franchise Executive, is Managing Member of the Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPA firm, from August 2010 to present and has extensive experience with entrepreneurial companies, having worked with them either as clients or as a C-level executive for more than 30 years. He is a 1979 graduate of the University of Michigan.


Honorable Judge John W. Thompson, General Counsel and a director.  Mr. Thompson was a judge on the York County Court of Common Pleas in York County, Pennsylvania. He was elected to the court in 1997 and was retained in 2007 for 10-year term, expiring in 2017.  Mr. Thompson retired before the end of his last term on May 31, 2015.  Mr. Thompson received both his undergraduate and J.D. degrees from the University of Pittsburgh.



92




Robert Choiniere, CFP®, ChairpersonPresident of the Audit Committee and an independent director.Committee.  Mr. Choiniere is a Certified Financial Planner Professional®. In 2005 he founded and is President of an independent Registered Investment Advisor firm headquartered in Pennsylvania.  Previously he was Director of Planning for a national transportation engineering firm, specializing in project planning and financial feasibility for major transportation projects.  Mr. Choiniere is a NAPFA-Registered Financial Advisor, is a member of the National Association of Tax Professionals, and a 1978 graduate of Florida Institute of Technology.

Bryan Elicker  an independent director, spent 30+ years in the funeral supply industry beginning in the factory at York Casket Company in York, PA. He eventually became a principal of York Caskets biggest distributor a multi-location, York, PA based company servicing the entire Northeastern part of the United States.  Bryan nowholdsnow holds the position of Chief Operating Officer at BAPS Auto Paint & Supply based in York, PA. BAPS is a family-owned, regional distributor of PPG & 3M products servicing the auto collision industry with locations from Virginia to Massachusetts. BAPS won the highly prestigious and coveted PPG Platinum Distributor of the Year Award in 2015 which is given to the premiere PPG distributor in the United States.

Joseph Hackett, an independent director. Mr. HackettJoe created managed and supervised several private banking groups as the organizations he worked with expanded their markets.  Given Joe's 20 plus year commercial middle market lending background he focused initially on lending as a way to quick profitability then moved to the investment and planning aspects deepening the relationships and the accompanying profitability.

The planning process resulted in the identification of several new revenue sources as Joe looked for ways to bring unique ideas to their clients. These included angel investing, enterprise risk captives, and structured sales of client business and real estate holdings.  These tax deferral strategies represented up to a 20% increase in investment dollars to be managed.  

Joe continues to grow the planning and investment focus through his company AIM Advisors.



None of the officers or directors of the Company has been a convicted in a criminal proceeding or named in a pending criminal proceeding, nor has been temporarily or permanently enjoined from engaging in any type of business activity, including any securities related business.


Committees and Terms


The Board of Directors (the Board) has established an Audit Committee. The Company will notify its shareholders for an annual shareholder meeting and that they may present proposals for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement to be mailed in connection with any such annual meeting; such proposals must be received by the Company at least 90 days prior to the meeting. No other specific policy has been adopted in regard to the inclusion of shareholder nominations to the Board of Directors.


Director Independence


Pursuant to Rule 4200 of The NASDAQ Stock Market one of the definitions of an independent director is a person other than an executive officer or employee of a company.  The Company's board of directors has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of the directors has with the Company, either directly or indirectly.  Based on this review, the board has determined that there are three independent directors.


Corporate Governance  




93



The Company does not have a nominating but does have an/compensation committee and nor audit committee of the board of directors.  The board of directors consists of fifteentwelve directors.  At such time that the Company has a larger board of directors and commences activities, the Company will propose creating committees of its board of directors, including both a nominating and an audit committee.


Conflicts of Interest


There are no binding guidelines or procedures for resolving potential conflicts of interest. Failure by management to resolve conflicts of interest in favor of the Company could result in liability of management to the Company.  However, any attempt by shareholders to enforce a liability of management to the Company would most likely be prohibitively expensive and time consuming.


Code of Ethics  


The Company has not at this time adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to rules described in Regulation S-K.  The Company intends to adopt a Code of Ethics to provide a manner of conduct.



Indemnification of Executive Officers and Directors


The Delaware General Corporate Law permits indemnification of directors, officers, and employees of corporations under certain conditions subject to certain limitations. In the event that a claim for indemnification (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by our director and officer in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is appropriate and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Remuneration of Officers: Summary Compensation Table


Remuneration of Officers: Summary Compensation Table


No executive officer has received cash compensation in the Company's fiscal year. The Company started accruing salaries and fees for certain employees, officers and directors in 2013. The Company has also issued stock to employees for their consulting and professional services. At the time the Company launches its planned IPO, the Company will pay these employees, officers and directors.


Anticipated Officer and Director Remuneration


The Company has not paid any cash compensation to any officer. The Company intends to pay annual salaries to all its officers and will pay an annual stipend to its directors as soon as possible. The Company has signed employment agreements with the founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company Founder and the CEO who will receive compensation equal to $1,200,000 per annum plus stock awards, The Company is now accruing compensation to its other key executive officers, including its Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Legal Counsel Compensation equal to $500,000 per annum plus stock awards.  The Company will pay its officers their accrued salary at such time, if ever when it successfully launches its IPO. The Company issues to certain directors for their service to the Company. Although not presently offered, the Company anticipates that its officers and directors will be provided with a group health, vision and dental insurance program.  The



94



Company also accrues compensation to its directors at $150,000 per annum, except certain independent directors which may receive compensation up to $120,000 per annum. The t able below accounts for the total amounts accrued to date as of the registration statement .









No equity

Nonqualified







Stock awards

 

Option

Incentive plan

compensation

All Other


Name and Title

Year

Salary

Bonus

#

$

 awards

compensation

 earnings

compensation

Total

Shah Mathias (1)

2014

$1,200,000

$0

6,400,000(1)

$1,600

$0

$0

$0


$1,201,600

Founder

2015

$1,200,000

$0

88,000,000 (2)

$22,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,222,000

 

2016

$1,200,000

$0

 

 

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,200,000

Debra Mathias

2014

$1,200,000

$0

1,000,000


$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$1,350,000

Chairman, CEO

2015

$1,200,000

$0

4,000,000 (3)

$1,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$1,351,000

 

2016

$1,200,000

$0

0

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$34,950,000

James Becker

2014

$0

$0



$0

$0

$0

$30,000

$30,000

President and Director

2015

$290,308

$0

4,400,000 (3)

$0

$0

$0

$0

$124,418

$414,726

 

2016

$650,000

$0

-0-

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$34,400,000

Steve Trout

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Secretary/Treasurer

2015

$350,000

$0

4,500,000 (3)

$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$500,000

and Director

2016

$600,000

$0

-0-

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$34,350,000

Shahjahan Mathias

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Vice Chairman

2015

$0

$0

4,400,000 (3)

$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

and Director

2016

$750,000

$0

-0-

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$34,500,000

Donald Williams

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$150,000

Director

2015


$0

4,400,000 (3)


$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$150,000

 

2016

$0

$0

-0-

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$33,750,000

Keith Doyle,

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Director

2015

$0

$0

4,000,000 (3)

$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

 

2016

$0

$0

-0-

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$33,750,000

Suhail Matthias,

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Director

2015

$0

$0

4,440,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

 

2016

$0

$0

-0-

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$33,750,000

R. Todd Reynold,

2014

$41,014

$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$191,014

Director

2015

$60,000

$0

4,000,000(3)

$1,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$211,000

 

2016

$500,000

$0

 

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$34,250,000

James Kingsborough

2014

$0

$0

-0-


$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Director

2015

$0

$0

4,000,000(3)

$1,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

 

2016

$0

$0

-0-

$0

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$33,750,000

Ronald Silberstein

2016

$500,000

$0

1,000,000(5)

$250

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$34,250,000

Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J Harold Hatchett III

2016

$500,000

$0

1,000,000(5)

$250

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$34,250,000

Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Thompson

2016

$500,000

$0

1,000,000(5)

$250

$33,600,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$34,250,000

Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Choiniere

2016

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$120,000

Independent Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bryan Elicker  

2016

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$120,000

Independent Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joseph Hackett

2016

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$120,000

Independent Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 










No equity

Nonqualified







Stock awards

 

Option

Incentive plan

compensation

All Other


Name and Title

Year

Salary

Bonus

#

$

 Awards (Options)

compensation

 earnings

compensation

Total

Shah Mathias (1)

2014

$1,200,000

$0

6,400,000(1)

$1,600

$0

$0

$0


$1,201,600

Founder

2015

$1,200,000

$0

88,000,000 (2)

$22,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,222,000

 

2016

$1,200,000

$0

 

 

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,200,000

Debra Mathias

2014

$1,200,000

$0

1,000,000


$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$1,350,000

Chairman, CEO

2015

$1,200,000

$0

4,000,000 (3)

$1,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$1,351,000

 

2016

$1,200,000

$0

0

$0

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$1,351,000

James Becker

2014

$0

$0



$0

$0

$0

$30,000

$30,000

President and Director

2015

$290,308

$0

-0-

$0

$0

$0

$0

$124,418

$414,726

 

2016

$350,000

$0

-0-

$0

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$500,000

Steve Trout

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Secretary/Treasurer

2015

$350,000

$0


$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$500,000

and Director

2016

$350,000

$0

-0-

$0

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$500,000

Shahjahan Mathias

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Vice Chairman

2015

$0

$0

4,400,000 (3)

$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

and Director

2016

$750,000

$0

-0-

$0

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Donald Williams

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$150,000

Director

2015


$0

4,400,000 (3)


$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$150,000

 

2016

$0

$0

-0-

$0

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Keith Doyle,

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Director

2015

$0

$0

4,000,000 (3)

$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

 

2016

$0

$0

-0-

$0

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Suhail Matthias,

2014


$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Director

2015

$0

$0

4,440,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

 

2016

$0

$0

-0-

$0

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

R. Todd Reynold,

2014

$41,014

$0



$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$191,014

Director

2015

$60,000

$0

4,000,000(3)

$1,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$211,000

 

2016

$268,333

$0

 

$0

 2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$418,333

James Kingsborough

2014

$0

$0

-0-


$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Director

2015

$0

$0

4,000,000(3)

$1,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

 

2016

$0

$0

-0-

$0

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$150,000

Ronald Silberstein

2016

$421,789

$0

1,000,000(5)

$250

2,000,000(6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$572,039

Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J Harold Hatchett III

2016

$406,284

$0

1,000,000(5)

$250

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

$556,534

Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Thompson

2016

$500,000

$0

1,000,000(5)

$250

2,000,000 (6)

$0

$0

$150,000

650,200

Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Choiniere

2016

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Independent Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bryan Elicker  

2016

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Independent Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joseph Hackett

2016

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Independent Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




(1). Shah Mathias was issued 6,400,000 post-split shares of Class A common stock with a fair value of $1,600.


(2) Shah Mathias was issued 40,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock with a fair value of $10,000 as additional compensation.  Shah Mathias was also issued 48,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock with a fair value of $12,000 pursuant to his employment agreement.  


(3) The named directors were issued 4,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock as part of their compensation package for current and future services to the company.



(5) The named director was issued 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock as part of his compensation package for current and future services to the company.


(6)  The named Directors were issued stock options at $42.00 as follows:


$42.00.

1)

Grant of Options.  The Company grants the Participant 2,000,000 Options under the Plan.  This grant is conditioned upon the Participants acceptance of all of the terms and conditions of the Plan.  The grant, vesting and all other matters affecting or otherwise relevant to such Options will be governed by the Plan, and the Participant agrees that he will be bound by all of the terms and conditions of the Plan.  Moreover, by participation in the Plan, Participant shall only be entitled to participate in distributions by the Company, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Company.

2)

Grant Date.  The Grant Date of the Options granted under this Agreement is March 8, 2016 & November 1, 2016.

3)

Exercise Price. The exercise price of each Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company, but shall not be greater than the price per share registered in the initial registration statement on Form S-1 /A filed by the Company following the date hereof.

4)

Vesting. The Options granted under this Agreement shall vest according to the following schedule:

a)

800,000 on the Grant Date, described above; and

b)

200,000 annually, on the Grant Date, for six (6) years.years.




Shah Mathias will receive 10% of the face value of all revenue contracts entered into by the Company.


The stock has been issued to the named employee without consideration for such issue and without any conditions or restrictions.


Employment Agreements


The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain officers and key personnel, as described herein.

96


For more information see Exhibit 10.56 and 10.57.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth information as of the date of this report regarding the beneficial ownership of the Companys common stock by each of its executive officers and directors, individually and as a group and by each person who beneficially owns in excess of five percent of the common stock after giving effect to any exercise of warrants or options held by that person.



















Name and Position

Shares Owned

Before Offering

Percent

of Class (1)

Shares Owned

After Offering (2)

Percent

of Class(1)

Shares Owned

Before Offering

Percent

of Class (1)

Shares Owned

After Offering (2)

Percent

of Class(1)

Shah Mathias,

Founder

989,200,000

94.90%

989,200,000

94.90%

Shah Mathias,

Founder , Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President

989,200,000

94.90%

928,400,,000

89.10%

James Becker, Director,

President

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

Steve Trout, Director,

Secretary; Treasurer

4,500,000

*

4,500,000

*

4,500,000

*

4,500,000

*

J. Harold Hatchett III

1,800,000(3)

*

1,800,000

*

1,800,000(3)

*

1,800,000

*

Chief Financial Officer

& Director









Shahjahan C Mathias,

Director

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

Donald Williams,

Director

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

4,400,000

*

Keith Doyle,

Director

4,000,000

*

4,000,000

*

4,000,000

*

4,000,000

*

Suhail Matthias,

Director

Ronald Silberstein

Chief Operating Officer

& Director

Robert Todd Reynold

Chief Risk Officer

& Director

Debra A Mathias

Chief Executive Officer

& Director

John W Thompson Jr

General Counsel & Director

James D Kingsborough

Director

4,440,000


1,800,000(3)



4,884,000(3)



4,100,000



1,810,000(3)


4,268,000

*


*


*


*


*



*


*

4,440,000


1,800,000



4,884,000



4,100,000



1,810,000


4,268,000

*


*


*


*


*



*


*

4,440,000


1,800,000(3)



4,884,000(3)



4,100,000



1,810,000(3)


4,268,000

*


*


*


*


*



*


*

4,440,000


1,800,000



4,884,000



4,100,000



1,810,000


4,268,000

*


*


*


*


*



*


*















* Less than 1%

(1) Based on 987,934,483 shares of common stock outstanding.

(2)Assumes all shares offered by the beneficial owners and management are sold.

(3) Total shares include 800,000 share option.

97



CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS


Steve Trout, Secretary/Treasurer and a director, is the brother-in-law of Shah Mathias, founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company the Founder of the Company.Company . Debra A. Mathias is the ex-wife, Shahjahan Mathias is the brother, and Suhail Matthias is the cousin, of Shah Mathias.


Related Companies


The Founder of the Company, Shah Mathias, has organized and established three nonprofit corporations and is a facilitator of a forth nonprofit (ATFI) for the purpose of facilitating the development of the transportation systems. The nonprofit statutes provide a vehicle to issue bonds and to help secure infrastructure projects. The nonprofits have the discretion to turn over the infrastructure projects to a state or governing body having jurisdiction after the indebtedness has been paid. The nonprofits that Mr. Mathias has created are:


1) Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (ATFI)

2) Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. (HSRF)

3) Hi Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. (HSRFP)

4) Global Transportation Infrastructure Development and Finance Authority


Shah Mathias, founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and non-board member President of the Company Founder of the Company , has established a series of corporations with which to effect the transactions and development of the projects envisioned by the Company including the Port Trajan Facility, high speed rail projects and the Alabama Toll Road.  The Company has envisioned long-range ideas and plans to develop currently undeveloped areas through which the planned Alabama toll road will traverse. These plans include the development of an airport, sea shipping port and a high speed rail line.


Although these companies are not subsidiaries of the Company, they are related companies as they are all under common control of Mr. Mathias.  Mr. Mathias has established these companies to basically serve as subcontractors for the operations of the planned transportation systems.

 

None of these companies has any operations or any revenues. Mr. Mathias (as sole officer, president and CEO of each of these companies) has executed contracts between several of these companies and the Company. The ARMT owns 25% ownership interest, non-voting, non-controlling shareholder interest, of each of the companies with the remaining ownership held directly or indirectly by Mr. Mathias.


1) HSR Freight line, Inc. designed to handle all services for use of track time and trains for freight and freight forwarding services.  

2) HSR Passenger Services, Inc. designed to handle rail ticketing booking, reservations, and food services.

3) HSR Technologies, Inc. designed to handle all building of suites and manufacturing of trains and rail tracks and provide fiber optics, telecommunications, and related technologies services.

4) HSR Logistics, Inc. designed to handle all purchasing functions.

5) KSJM International Airport, Inc. designed to eventually create an airport facility in inland Alabama

6) Port Of Ostia, Inc. designed to handle all air cargo if and when an airport facility is created.

7) Port of De Claudius, Inc. designed to handle sea container and port operations.

 8) AMERI Cement, Inc. designed to handle cement needs for building Alabama toll road.

9) Lord Chauffeurs LTD: designed to operate all passenger ground transportation.

10) Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc. designed to provide utility and maintenance service to above entities.

11) Penn Insurance Services LLC. Designed to provide insurance service to above entities.

12) Cape Horn Abstracting, Co. designed to land title examination services.

13) Eastern Development & Design, Inc.  Designed to provide all civil engineering and architectural service.

14) Slater & West, Inc. designed to handle contract administration services and work force H R matters.

15) Malibu Homes, Inc. designed to establish residential home building services.

16) Platinum Media, Inc. designed to provide all media related services.

98



DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES


The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have the authority to issue is 12,207,000,000 (Twelve billion Two hundred and Seven million) shares, consisting of 12,007,000,000 (Twelve billion Seven million) shares of Common Stock having a par value of $.000001 and 200,000,000 (Two hundred million) shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of $.000001 per share.


Common stock is divided into four classes: Common stock class A, par value $.000001, 7,000,000 shares authorized, 1,600,000 shares issued and outstanding; Common stock class B, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 988,602,007 shares issued and outstanding; Common stock class C, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 48,000,000 shares outstanding; and Common stock class D, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 48,000,000 shares outstanding.


Class A 7,000,000 (Seven Million) these shares have 1000:1 voting right compared to all other Class of shares and have equal dividend rights as all other Class of shares, par value .000001. There are 1,600,000 Class A stock outstanding at November 15, 2016. Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares (EPDS) 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion) with no voting rights but with dividend rights, par value $.000001. Company may issue these shares as it deems necessary, for the purposes including but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations. Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares (EPS) 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion) with no voting rights and no dividend rights, par value $.000001. Company may issue these shares as its currency as it deems necessary, for the following purposes but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.


The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in series and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.

The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:

A. The number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;

B. The dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and, if so, from what date or dates, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of that series;

C. Whether that series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

D. Whether that series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

E. Whether or not that series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates;

F. Whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of shares of that series, and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

G. The rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of the shares of that series; and

H. Any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.



99



This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect.


Preferred Shares: 200,000,000 (Two hundred Million) par value .000001. There are 1,800,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding at November 15, 2016.


On November 3, 2014, the Company effected a 4:1 forward stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock. As a condition of the split, all shareholders who wanted to participate were required to send $100 to the Transfer Agent to pay for the expense related to reissuance of shares due to split. The cutoff date for the return of the notification and payment to the transfer agent was December 31, 2014. If the shareholder did not return the confirmation and payment, they would not be eligible to receive the additional shares.


MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


Market Information

 


There is no public market for the Companys common stock. No assurances can be given that a public market will develop or that, if a market does develop, it will be sustained. The Company engaged a market maker to establish a public market for the Shares being offered herein on the OTCPink Sheets. The Company plans to apply to eventually be listed on NASDAQ.  To be listed on NASDAQ, a market maker the Company must file an application on the Company's behalf to make a market in the common stock.stock with NASDAQ . There is no guarantee that the Shares will ever be listed on NASDAQ or any exchange.


The Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to change its existing stock capitalization. Company authorized the total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have the authority to issue is 12,207,000,000 (Twelve billion Two hundred and Seven million) shares, consisting of 12,007,000,000 (Twelve billion Seven million) shares of Common Stock having a par value of $.000001 and 200,000,000 (Two hundred million) shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of $.000001 per share.


The Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to change its existing authorized preferred and common shares from the current shares to the following:


Preferred Shares: 200,000,000 (Two hundred Million) par value .000001.

Class A 7,000,000 (Class A common shares) these shares have 1000:1 voting right compared to all other Class of shares and have equal dividend rights as all other Class of shares, par value $.000001.

Class B 4,000,000,000 (Class B common shares) with voting and dividend rights, par value $.000001.

Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares 4,000,000,000 (Class C common shares) with no voting rights but with dividend rights, par value $.000001.


Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares 4,000,000,000 (Class D common shares) with no voting rights and no dividend rights, par value $.000001.

 

As of November 15, 2016, there were 987,934,483 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 1,800,000 shares of preferred stock.


Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class C common shares) with no voting rights but with dividend rights, par value $.000001. Company may issue these shares as it deems necessary, for the purposes including but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.

100

Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class D common shares) with no voting rights and no dividend rights, par value $.000001. Company may issue these shares as its currency as it deems necessary, for the following purposes but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.

 

The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in series and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. 

The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:

A.

The number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;

 

B.

The dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and, if so, from what date or dates, and the  relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of that series;

 

C.

Whether that series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

 

D.

Whether that series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

 

E.

Whether or not that series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates;

 

F.

Whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of shares of that series, and , if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

 

G.

The rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of the shares of that series; and

 

H.  Any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.


1.

This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

2.

All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect.

101 

Special Purpose Shares:

As described below the class C and orclass D shares are special purpose shares., The Company intends to utilize mechanism to purchase private activity bonds and infrastructure bonds as part of the Companys services.

In the event the investment opportunity becomes available to the Company, as an investor or joint venture partner to the affiliate or Non-affiliate Company or companies projects, then it is in the best interest of the Company, to purchase the private activity bonds or infrastructure bonds. The Company will buy the bonds by offering for sale, class C or D shares to investors, for project specific investments. The issuer of bonds are affiliate or non-affiliate company or companies, not ARMT.  

Benefit to the parties:

a.

The Company will hold back onto itself a quarter of a percent of the stated annual interest rate on the bonds and distribute the balance of the stated annual interest rate on the bonds to the investors of class C shares. As an example the bonds may offer a 3% rate return and the Company will hold back .25% unto itself. The quarter of a percent held back is in the interest of the Company. The Company will exchange class C and D shares for the bonds and will enjoy the performing asset of the bond rate of return. In addition too, the Company will enjoy the profit sharing shown under the class C example.

b.

To the class C shareholders they will benefit from the bond rate percentage in addition to the profit sharing of the project as outlined as an example in the Class C table. The class D shareholders will benefit from profit sharing of the project as outlined as an example in the Class D table.

Identifying risk factors for class C and or D shares:

a.

In the event the investment opportunity becomes available to the Company for issuing class C and or D shares to purchase bonds, as an investor or joint venture partner to the affiliate or non-affiliate company or companies projects, the class C and or D shareholders prospectus or memorandum of offering, for each specific project, will identify risk factors, including the creditor and stakeholders priority position in the event of bankruptcy.

The investor of class C and or D shares, also have the choice to invest in class B shares if the investors choose to do so.  However, investors of class C and or D shares are isolated investors from the overall ARMT operations.

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of ARMT dated September 14, 2014 with the State of Delaware, Secretary of State, Division of Corporations, Under Article Four declares the following:

The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in series and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.

            The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:

A.                 The number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;

B.                 The dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and, if so, from what date or dates, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of that series;

C.                 Whether that series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

D.                Whether that series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

E.                 Whether or not that series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates;

F.                 Whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of shares of that series, and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

G.                The rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of the shares of that series; and

H.                Any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.


This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of The  State of Delaware. All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect. Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class C common shares) with no voting rights but with dividend rights, par value $.000001. Company may issue these shares as it deems necessary, for the purposes including but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.

ARMT Class "C" Shares Illustration

 

 

 

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline

 


 

$27,000,000,000

Class C shares Purchased

 

 

$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



 

$5,000,000,000

 



 



Est.  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%

$1,890,000,000

 

 

 

 


ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

 

$472,500,000

Net profit off project


 

 

$1,417,500,000

77% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

 

 

 

$1,091,475,000

23% 0f Net profit for Class C Shareholders and ARMT

 

 

 

$326,025,000

Dividend to Class C Shareholders  @ 2.75%  over 30 years

 

 

 

$4,125,000,000

23% Net Profit breakdown

 

 

 

16% 0f the 23% Net profit for benefit of Class C Shareholder and ARMT

 

69% of net profit

$224,957,250

ARMT 7% of 23% Net profits

31% of net profit

$101,067,750

Class C Shareholders profit sharing  is 10% of 16%

 

63% net profit for benefit

$141,723,068

 6 % of 16% profit sharing is held for reinvestment

 

37% net profit for benefit

$83,234,183

Earnings on remaining 6% @ 5% growth over 30 years

 

 

 

$87,395,892

10% Class C Shareholders Distribution of earnings and growth over 30 years

 

 

 

$8,739,589

90% of earnings and growth held for protection of investors

$78,656,302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C ROI

4,275,462,657

 

 

 

Principal

5,000,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C distributions over 30 years


9,275,462,657

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

over 30 years accumulated


185.51%

 

 

per year over 30 years

6.18%

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

ARMT return

$573,567,750

 

 

over 30 years accumulated

11.47%

 

 

 

 

0.38%

 

 

 

 

 



Retainage Fund

$78,656,302



Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class D common shares) with no voting rights and no dividend rights, par value $.000001. Company may issue these shares as its currency as it deems necessary, for the following purposes but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for ARMT; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations.

ARMT Class "D" Shares Illustration

 

 


 

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline

 


 


$27,000,000,000

Class D shares Purchased

 

 

 


$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



 


$5,000,000,000

 



 




Est  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%


$1,890,000,000

 

 

 

 



ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

 

 

 


$472,500,000

Net profit off project


 

 


$1,417,500,000

70% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

 

 

 


$992,250,000

30 % 0f Net profit for Class D Shareholders and ARMT

 

 

 


$425,250,000

30 % Net Profit breakdown

 

 

 



23 % 0f the 30 % Net profit for benefit of Class D Shareholder

 

77% of net profit

 


$327,442,500

ARMT 7% of 30 % Net profits

 

23 % of net profit

 


$97,807,500

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Class D ROI


327,442,500

 

 

 

Principal


5,000,000,000

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Class D distributions over 30 years



5,327,442,500

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

over 30 years accumulated



106.55%

 

 

per year over 30 years

 


3.55%

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

ARMT return


$570,307,500

 

 

over 30 years accumulated

 


11.41%

 

 

 

 


0.38%

Note: Class D Shareholders will enjoy 100% of growth on their 23% of net profits





Issuing of Class C shares:Company for the purpose of the offering anticipates issuing of   Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shares.

Company anticipates that it will issue shares to purchasing goods and services for ARMT; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects. Collectively called the investment activities  

The Company has entered into an Agreement with HSRF Trust, a statutory as asset manager for fee HSRF Trust will hold shares for the company and will release to the market per the direction of the company.

Dividend payment policy: ARMT anticipate 23% of the  net profits  from the activities  of investment by  issuing ofclass C a/k/a equity participation dividend shares EPDS shares. Upon issuing of shares for the following purpose:

 Shares are serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate. Issuing of such shares is called the investment activities.  

Upon issuing of shares for the above purpose company ARMT anticipate 23% of the net profits from the investment activities. The Company will set aside 16% of the 23% net profits to the benefit of the Class Cshareholders AND retain 7% onto itself AND 6% of the 16% will be held for future investments for the EPDSshareholders and 10% will be distributed as dividend to Class Ca/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shareholders.  Class Ca/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shareholders will receive 10% profit sharing from 6% investment pool over time.

102


Voting rights:Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shares (Have NO VOTING RIGHTS)

ARMT Class "C" Shares Illustration

 

 

 

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline

 


 

$27,000,000,000

Class C shares Purchased

 

 

$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



 

$5,000,000,000

 



 



Est.  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%

$1,890,000,000

 

 

 

 


ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

 

$472,500,000

Net profit off project


 

 

$1,417,500,000

77% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

 

 

 

$1,091,475,000

23% 0f Net profit for Class C Shareholders and ARMT

 

 

 

$326,025,000

Dividend to Class C Shareholders  @ 2.75%  over 30 years

 

 

 

$4,125,000,000

23% Net Profit breakdown

 

 

 

16% 0f the 23% Net profit for benefit of Class C Shareholder and ARMT

 

69% of net profit

$224,957,250

ARMT 7% of 23% Net profits

31% of net profit

$101,067,750

Class C Shareholders profit sharing  is 10% of 16%

 

63% net profit for benefit

$141,723,068

 6 % of 16% profit sharing is held for reinvestment

 

37% net profit for benefit

$83,234,183

Earnings on remaining 6% @ 5% growth over 30 years

 

 

 

$87,395,892

10% Class C Shareholders Distribution of earnings and growth over 30 years

 

 

 

$8,739,589

90% of earnings and growth held for protection of investors

$78,656,302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C ROI

4,275,462,657

 

 

 

Principal

5,000,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C distributions over 30 years


9,275,462,657

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

over 30 years accumulated


185.51%

 

 

per year over 30 years

6.18%

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

ARMT return

$573,567,750

 

 

over 30 years accumulated

11.47%

 

 

 

 

0.38%

 

 

 

 

 



Retainage Fund

$78,656,302

ARMT Class "C" Shares Illustration

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline


$27,000,000,000

Class C shares Purchased

$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



$5,000,000,000





Est.  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%

$1,890,000,000


ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

$472,500,000

Net profit off project


$1,417,500,000

77% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

$1,091,475,000

23% 0f Net profit for Class C Shareholders and ARMT

$326,025,000

Dividend to Class C Shareholders  @ 2.75%  over 30 years

$4,125,000,000

23% Net Profit breakdown

16% 0f the 23% Net profit for benefit of Class C Shareholder and ARMT

69% of net profit

$224,957,250

ARMT 7% of 23% Net profits

31% of net profit

$101,067,750

Class C Shareholders profit sharing  is 10% of 16%

63% net profit for benefit

$141,723,068

 6 % of 16% profit sharing is held for reinvestment

37% net profit for benefit

$83,234,183

Earnings on remaining 6% @ 5% growth over 30 years

$87,395,892

10% Class C Shareholders Distribution of earnings and growth over 30 years

$8,739,589

90% of earnings and growth held for protection of investors

$78,656,302

Class C ROI

4,275,462,657

Principal

5,000,000,000

Class C distributions over 30 years


9,275,462,657

over 30 years accumulated


185.51%

per year over 30 years

6.18%


ARMT return

$573,567,750

over 30 years accumulated

11.47%

0.38%



Retainage Fund

$78,656,302


103

Issuing of Class D shares:Class Da/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS” “D common shares): Company for the purpose of the offering anticipates issuing of   Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPSa/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPS shares.


The Company anticipates that it will issue shares to purchasing goods and services for ARMT; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; The Company has entered into an Agreement with HSRF Trust, a statutory as asset manager for fee. HSRF Trust will hold shares for the company and will release to the market per the direction of the company.


ARMT Class "D" Shares Illustration

 

 


 

Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline

 


 


$27,000,000,000

Class D shares Purchased

 

 

 


$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased



 


$5,000,000,000

 



 




Est  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%


$1,890,000,000

 

 

 

 



ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev

 

 

 


$472,500,000

Net profit off project


 

 


$1,417,500,000

70% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT

 

 

 


$992,250,000

30 % 0f Net profit for Class C Shareholders and ARMT

 

 

 


$425,250,000

30 % Net Profit breakdown

 

 

 



23 % 0f the 30 % Net profit for benefit of Class C Shareholder

 

77% of net profit

 


$327,442,500

ARMT 7% of 30 % Net profits

 

23 % of net profit

 


$97,807,500

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Class C ROI


327,442,500

 

 

 

Principal


5,000,000,000

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Class C distributions over 30 years



5,327,442,500

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

over 30 years accumulated



106.55%

 

 

per year over 30 years

 


3.55%

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

ARMT return


$570,307,500

 

 

over 30 years accumulated

 


11.41%

 

 

 

 


0.38%

Note: Class C Shareholders will enjoy 100% of growth on their 23% of net profits

104

ARMT Class "D" Shares Illustration


Revenue over 30 years off typical $5 Bill project in ARMT pipeline



$27,000,000,000

Class D shares Purchased


$5,000,000,000

Bonds purchased




$5,000,000,000






Est  Net profit of REV for 30 yrs.


7%


$1,890,000,000



ARMT lic agreement percentage 25% of gross rev


$472,500,000

Net profit off project



$1,417,500,000

70% paid  to supporting entities that constructed project for ARMT


$992,250,000

30 % 0f Net profit for Class C Shareholders and ARMT


$425,250,000

30 % Net Profit breakdown



23 % 0f the 30 % Net profit for benefit of Class C Shareholder

77% of net profit


$327,442,500

ARMT 7% of 30 % Net profits

23 % of net profit


$97,807,500


Class C ROI


327,442,500

Principal


5,000,000,000


Class C distributions over 30 years



5,327,442,500


over 30 years accumulated



106.55%

per year over 30 years


3.55%



ARMT return


$570,307,500

over 30 years accumulated


11.41%


0.38%

Note: Class C Shareholders will enjoy 100% of growth on their 23% of net profits


Dividend Payment Policy: ARMT anticipate Issuing of Class D shareswill yield30% of the net profits from the investment activities.  The Company will set aside 23% of net profits to the benefit of the Class D shareholders. And retain 7% of 30 % onto itself and 23% will be held for future investments for the shareholder, 23% reserves from the activities of investment held for future investments for the shareholder is equity appreciation.

Voting rights:shares :Class Da/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS (D common shares)  shares have no voting rights and no dividend rights 30% of the net profits from the activities of investment held for future investments  for the shareholder is equity appreciation as described above the class C and class D shares are special purposes shares in addition to purposes stated above company intend to utilize mechanism to issues shares to accredited investors the proceeds from the sale of class C and or class D shares will be used to purchase private activities and public infrastructure bonds. The Companys recent Form 8-K filing shows that $509 billion dollars in parallel infrastructure bonds on record.  

For example:

Shares are serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate. Issuing of such shares is called the investment activities.  

Issuing of Class C sharesa/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shares. The Company may issues service of class C shares with project pacific designation in the offering memorandum or prospectus. Under the Dividend payment policythe net profits from the joint venture investment activities in the bond will pay 2.75 % annual (Annual rate to be set by the company in the class C memorandum(s) of offering or prospectus(s) payable every 90 days to the project pacific class C series of shares to the investors

 In addition to the joint venture benefits, company will set aside 16% of the 23% net profits to the benefit of the Class Cshareholders. AND retain 7% onto itself AND 6% of the 16% will be held for future investments for the EPDS shareholders and 10% will be distributed as dividend to Class Ca/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS shareholders in addition to receiving dividend form the set aside 16% of the 23% net profits to the benefit of the Class Cshareholders.  

Stock redemption policy for class C and D:

As noted above class C and D share are referred to as Special purpose shares in the event the shares are used to purchase privet actives and public infrastructures bonds or ancillary development bonds shares are retired and surrender to the company at same time as the retirements of the bonds. The redemption clause will be set in memorandum or offering documents.

105


Conflict of Interest

 

The current officers and directors of the Company shall devote full-time focus to the Company. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such person may face a conflict in selecting between our business interest and their other business interests. The policy of the Board is that any personal business or corporate opportunity incurred by an officer or director of the Company must be examined by the Board and turned down by the Board in a timely basis before an officer or director can engage or take advantage of a business opportunity which could result in a conflict of interest.

 

Other than Shah Mathias, none of the following parties has, since the date of incorporation, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction with the Company or in any presently proposed transaction that has or will materially affect us:

 

 

The officers and directors; 

 

Any person proposed as a nominee for election as a director;

 

Any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, Shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to the outstanding Shares of common stock; 

 

Any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons who have the same house as such person. 

 

As per the definition of a promoter, generally defined as anyone involved in the formation of the issuer, Shah Mathias, the incorporator of the Company, would be considered a promoter.


The term promoter includes: i) any person who, acting alone or in conjunction with one or more persons, directly or indirectly takes initiative in founding and organizing the business or enterprise of an issue; or ii) any person who, in connection with the founding and organizing of the business or enterprise of an issuer, directly or indirectly receives in consideration of services or property, or both services and property, 10 percent or more of any class securities of the issuer or 10 percent or more of the proceeds from the sale of any class of such securities. However, a person who receives such securities or proceeds either solely as underwriting commissions or solely in consideration of property shall not be deemed a promoter within the meaning of this paragraph, if such person does not otherwise take part in founding and organizing the enterprise.


Other than Mr. Mathias, there are no promoters being used in relation with this offering. No persons who may, in the future, be considered a promoter will receive or expect to receive any assets, services or other consideration from the Company. No assets will be or are expected to be acquired from any promoter on behalf of the Company.


Holders


As of the date of this registration statement, we had approximately 189 stockholders of record of our common stock.


Dividends

 

We have not declared any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. We plan to retain future earnings, if any, for use in our business. Any decisions as to future payments of dividends will depend on our earnings and financial position and such other facts, as the Board of Directors deems relevant.


Reports to Stockholders

 

The Company is a reporting company pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and files with the Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly, annual, periodic and other reports.  The Company intends to deliver a copy of its annual report to its security holders, and will voluntarily send a copy of the annual report, including audited financial statements, to any registered shareholder who requests.  The Companys documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be inspected at the Commissions principal office in Washington, D.C. Copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference rooms. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. All of the Companys filings may be located under the CIK number 0001534155.


Transfer Agent


Quicksilver Stock Transfer, 6623 Las Vegas Blvd South #255, Las Vegas NV 89119 is the registrar and transfer agent for our Common Stock.

106


CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


Not applicable.



DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION OF INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

 

Our Bylaws, subject to the provisions of the Delaware General Corporate Law, contain provisions which allow the Company to indemnify any person against liabilities and other expenses incurred as the result of defending or administering any pending or anticipated legal issue in connection with service to us if it is determined that person acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed was in or not opposed to the best interest of the Company. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our director, officer and controlling person, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.




INTEREST OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

Financial Auditors


Financial Auditors


Current financial statements for the period included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of Weinberg & Baer LLC, independent public accountant, given on that firms authority as experts in auditing and accounting.


Legal Counsel Providing Legal Opinion  


The validity of the issuance of the Shares of common stock will be passed upon for the company by McMurdo Law Group, LLC Counsel has additionally consented to his opinion being included as an exhibit to this filing. Additionally, counsel has consented to being named in the prospectus.   


The legal counsel that passed their opinion on the legality of these securities is:


McMurdo Law Group, LLC

28 West 44th Street, 16th Floor

New York, NY 10036






WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 /A (File Number 000-_______)333-214786 000-_______ ) under the Securities Act of 1933 regarding the Shares of common stock offered hereby. This prospectus does not contain all of the information found in the registration statement, portions of which are omitted as permitted under the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information regarding us and the securities offered by this prospectus, please refer to the registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules. Statements made in this prospectus concerning the contents of any contract, agreement or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are summaries of the terms of those documents. The registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, including its exhibits and schedules, may be inspected and copied at the public reference room maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

 

The SEC maintains a web site on the Internet at www.sec.gov. Our registration statement and other information that we file with the SEC are available at the SEC's website.

 

We make annual reports (on Form 10-K) containing our audited consolidated financial statements and quarterly reports (on Form 10-Q) containing our unaudited interim consolidated financial information for the first three fiscal quarters of each of our fiscal years available to our stockholders.

 

If you are a stockholder, you may request a copy of these filings at no cost by contacting us at:


Ameri Metro, Inc.

2575 Eastern Blvd.

York, Pennsylvania 17402

107




AMERI METRO, INC.


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSTABLE OF CONTENTS


JULYOctober 31, 2016


INDEX

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1



Page

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)


Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2016 and July 31, 2016 (unaudited)

F-1


Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) - For the Three Months ended October 31, 2016 and 2015

F-2


Consolidated Statements of Operations forCash Flows (unaudited) - For the yearsThree Months ended JulyOctober 31, 2016 and 2015

F-3


Notes to Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity (Deficit) for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015Financial Statements

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015

F-5


Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsItem 2.

F-6 - F-14Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

11


Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

51


Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

51

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

52


Item 1A.

Risk Factors

52


Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

52


Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

52


Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

52


Item 5.

Other Information

52


Item 6.

Exhibits

52


Signatures

54



108
3



REPORT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Ameri Metro Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ameri Metro Inc. as of July 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ameri Metro Inc. as of July 31, 2016 and 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs. As such, it has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as of July 31, 2016, the cash resources of the Company were insufficient to meet its planned business objectives. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. Managements plan regarding these matters is also described in Note 2 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Respectfully submitted,

[s120161121r1050.gif]

Weinberg & Baer LLC

Baltimore, Maryland

November 3, 2016


F-1







AMERI METRO, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSHEETS


July 31,
2016

July 31,
2015

ASSETS



Current assets



Cash and cash equivalents

$ 27,160 

$                      

Prepaid expenses

 8,678 




Total current assets

 35,838 




Office equipment, net

 2,245 

 601 

Prepaid expenses and deposits

 2,940 

 1,500 




Total Assets

$ 41,023 

$ 2,101 




LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT



Liabilities



Current liabilities



    Bank indebtedness

$                         

$ 528 

    Accounts payable

 1,069,608 

 272,972 

    Accrued expenses

 14,320,245 

 7,704,828 

    Due to related parties

 1,050 

 250 

    Loans payable related parties

 960,967 

 528,552 

    Loans payable

 3,403 

 3,403 




Total Liabilities

 16,355,273 

 8,510,533 




Stockholders Deficit



Preferred stock, par value $.000001, 200,000,000 shares authorized,
1,800,000 shares issued and outstanding (1,800,000 2015)

 2 

 2 

Common stock class A, par value $.000001, 7,000,000 shares authorized, 1,600,000 shares issued and outstanding (6,400,000 2015)

 1 

 6 

Common stock class B, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 987,934,483 shares issued and outstanding (1,093,876,626 2015)

 988 

 1,094 

Common stock class C, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 4,800,000 shares issued and outstanding (nil 2015)

 5 

Common stock class D, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 48,000,000 shares outstanding (nil 2015)

 48 

Additional paid in capital

 5,581,929 

 5,595,967 

Stock subscriptions receivable

 (47,000)

 (47,000)

Accumulated deficit

 (21,850,223)

 (14,058,501)




Total Stockholders Deficit

 (16,314,250)

 (8,508,432)




Total Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit

$ 41,023 

$ 2,101 

(Unaudited)






October 31,
2016

July 31,
2016

ASSETS



Current assets



Cash and cash equivalents

$

620 

$

27,160 

Prepaid expenses

5,417 

8,678 




Total current assets

6,037 

35,838 




Office equipment, net

2,114 

2,245 

Prepaid expenses and deposits

2,940 

2,940 




Total Assets

$

11,091 

$

41,023 




LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS



Liabilities



Current liabilitiesDEFICIT



    Accounts payable

$

1,048,434 

$

1,069,608 

    Accrued expenses

16,000,220 

14,320,245 

    Due to related parties

1,050 

1,050 

    Loans payable related parties

970,243 

960,967 

    Loans payable

3,403 

3,403 




Total Liabilities

18,023,350 

16,355,273 




Stockholders Deficit



Preferred stock, par value $.000001, 200,000,000 shares authorized,
1,800,000 shares issued and outstanding (1,800,000 July 31, 2016)

Common stock class A, par value $.000001, 7,000,000 shares authorized, 1,600,000 shares issued and outstanding (1,600,000 July 31, 2016)

Common stock class B, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 988,038,587 shares issued and outstanding (987,934,483 July 31, 2016)

988 

988 

Common stock class C, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 4,800,000 shares issued and outstanding (4,800,000 July 31, 2016)

Common stock class D, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 48,000,000 shares outstanding (48,000,000 July 31, 2016)

48 

48 

Additional paid in capital

5,581,975 

5,581,929 

Stock subscriptions receivable

(47,000)

(47,000)

Accumulated deficit

(23,548,278)

(21,850,223)




Total Stockholders Deficit

(18,012,259)

(16,314,250)




Total Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit

$

11,091 

$

41,023 





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2

F-1



 

AMERI METRO, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)



Year

ended

July 31, 2016

Year

ended

July 31, 2015




OPERATING EXPENSES



Professional fees

$

843,418 

$

37,400 

Directors fees

1,950,750 

1,339,868 

Depreciation

422 

319 

General & administrative

628,958 

460,918 

Officer payroll

4,354,536 

3,390,308 




TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

7,778,084 

5,228,813 




LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

(7,778,084)

(5,228,813)




OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)



Franchise tax recovery (expense)

(180,000)

Interest expense

(13,633)

(474)

Termination fee

(5)

(427)




TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

(13,638)

(180,901)




NET LOSS

$

(7,791,722)

$

(5,409,714)




LOSS PER SHARE (BASIC AND DILUTED)

$

(0.01)

$

(0.01)




WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING (BASIC AND DILUTED)

1,060,109,184 

1,016,009,671 









Three months

ended

October 31, 2016

Three months

ended

October 31, 2015





OPERATING EXPENSES




Professional fees


$          15,100         

$        775,873

Directors fees


450,000

600,750

Depreciation


131

80

General & administrative


146,760

184,137

Officer payroll


1,081,296

1,110,417





TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES


1,693,287

2,671,257





LOSS FROM OPERATIONS


(1,693,287)

(2,671,257)





OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)




Interest expense


(4,768)

(146)

Termination fee


(5)





TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)


(4,768)

(151)





NET LOSS


$   (1,698,055)

$   (2,671,408)





LOSS PER SHARE (BASIC AND DILUTED)


$            (0.00)

$            (0.00)





WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING (BASIC AND DILUTED)


1,042,634,061

1,105,352,006




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


F-3

F-2






AMERI METRO, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICITCASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 AND JULY 31, 2015(Unaudited)


Common Stock Class A

Common Stock Class B

Common Stock Class C

Common Stock Class D

Preferred Stock

Additional Paid in

Stock Subscription

Accumulated



Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Capital

Receivable

Deficit

Total
















Balance, July 31, 2014

6,400,000

$             6

934,526,724

$        935 

$             

$             

1,800,000

$             2

$ 5,554,659

$   (47,000)

$   (8,648,787)

$  (3,140,185)

Shares unissued per partial stock split

(6,051,000)

(6)

                     6

Shares issued for compensation

164,219,942

              164

            40,876

41,040

Shares issued for termination fee

1,708,960

                  2

425

427

Shares reinstated as shares were cancelled in error in 2014

2,000

                  –

                    –

Shares rescinded for services

(530,000)

                  (1)

                    1

Net loss

             –

 –

(5,409,714)

(5,409,714)












Balance, July 31, 2015

6,400,000

$             6

1,093,876,626

$      1,094

$             

$             

1,800,000

$             2

$ 5,595,967

$   (47,000)

$ (14,058,501)

$  (8,508,432)

Reclassification of Class B shares to Class D

(48,000,000)

(48)

48,000,000

48

Reclassification of Class A shares to Class C

(4,800,000)

(5)

4,800,000

5

Shares issues for partial stock-split

3,375,000

3

(3)

-

Shares reinstated as shares were cancelled in error in 2015

20,000

Shares issued for compensation

3,020,000

3

752

755

Shares cancelled

(64,357,143)

(64)

(15,156)

(15,220)

Stock-based compensation

369

369

Net loss

(7,791,722)

(7,791,722)












Balance, July 31, 2016

1,600,000

$            1

987,934,483

$        988

4,800,000

$            5

48,000,000

$          48

1,800,000

$             2

$ 5,581,929

$ (47,000)

$ (21,850,223)

$ (16,314,250)







Three months

ended

October 31, 2016

Three months

ended

October 31, 2015

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES



Net loss

 $ (1,698,055)

 $ (2,671,408)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:



   Issuance of stock for services

  750 

   Issuance of stock for termination fees

  5 

   Depreciation expense

  131 

  80 

   Stock-based compensation

  46 




Change in operating assets and liabilities:



Prepaid expense and deposits

  3,261 

  (3,000)

   Accounts payable

  (21,174)

  952,957 

   Accrued expenses

  1,679,975 

  1,675,729 




Cash flows used in operating activities

  (35,816)

  (44,887)




CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES



Bank indebtedness

  (528)

Proceeds from related party loans

  9,276 

  112,000 

Repayment of related party loans

  (26,065)

Due to related parties

  800 




Cash flows provided by financing activities

  9,276 

  86,207 




NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  (26,540)

  41,320 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

  27,160 




CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

 $ 620 

 $ 41,320 




SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:



Interest paid

$                    

$                   

Income taxes paid

$                    

$                   




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


F-4

F-3


AMERI METRO, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



Year

ended

July 31, 2016

Year

ended

July 31, 2015

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES



Net loss

$ (7,791,722)

$   (5,409,714)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:



   Issuance of stock for services

750

41,040

   Issuance of stock for termination fees

5

427

   Cancellation of stock issued for services

(15,220)

   Depreciation expense

422

319

   Stock-based compensation

369




Change in operating assets and liabilities:



Prepaid expense and deposits

(10,118)

   Accounts payable

796,636

171,478

   Accrued expenses

6,615,417

5,149,951




Cash flows used in operating activities

(403,461)

(46,499)




CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES



Purchase of property and equipment

(2,066)




Cash flows used in investing activities

(2,066)




CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES



Bank indebtedness

(528)

528

Repayment of loan payable


(600)

Proceeds from related party loans

465,193

44,130

Repayment of related party loans

(32,778)

Due to related parties

800

250




Cash flows provided by financing activities

432,687

44,308




NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

27,160

(2,191)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR

2,191




CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR

$           27,160             

$                               




SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:



Interest paid

$                    

$                   

Income taxes paid

$                    

$                   




SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:



Issuable common stock Class B

$                    

$                   6




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

AMERI METRO, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULYOCTOBER 31, 2016

(Unaudited)


NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

Ameri Metro, Inc. (Ameri Metro and the Company) was formed to engage primarily in high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related transportation projects.  The Company initially intends to develop a Midwest high-speed rail system for passengers and freight.  Currently the Company is engaged in raising capital and entering into relationships in furtherance of its planned activities.

The Companys activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties including failure to secure additional funding to properly execute the companys business plan.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Companys financial statements filed with the SEC on Form 10K.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the consolidated financial statements to be not misleading have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the consolidated financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year 2016 as reported in Form 10K, have been omitted.

NOTE 2 GOING CONCERN

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not generated any revenues since inception and is unlikely to generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. As at JulyOctober 31, 2016, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $16,319,435$18,017,313 and has accumulated losses of $21,850,223$23,548,278 since inception. The ability of Ameri Metro to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company generating cash from the sale of its common stock and/or obtaining debt financing and attaining future profitable operations.

Managements plans include selling its equity securities and obtaining debt financing to fund its capital requirement and on-going operations; however, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in these efforts. These factors create substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for Ameri Metro, Inc. (AMI) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure, Inc. (GTI).   Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for the period reported include only the results of operations for AMI as GTI was not formed until December 1, 2010, and was inactive for the period from December 1, 2010 to July 31, 2016.

Accounting Basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP accounting). The Company has adopted a July 31 fiscal year end.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars.

Financial Instruments

According to FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Guidance under ACS 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:


 F-6

Level 1:

Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2:

Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, amounts due to related parties, loans payable, and loans payable to related parties. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate fair value due either to length of maturity or interest rates that approximate prevailing rates unless otherwise disclosed in these financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all short-term debt securities purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  

Property and Equipment

The capital assets are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method of depreciation for book purposes. Office equipment has a useful life of five years.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, the balances of which at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company continually monitors its banking relationships and consequently has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions considered to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ from the estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the prior-year financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform with the presentation in the current period statements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company has yet to realize significant revenues from operations and is still in the development stage.  The Company recognizes revenues when delivery of goods or completion of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers, the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable is collection is reasonably assured.

F-7

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method.  Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws.  A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized. It is the Companys policy to classify interest and penalties on income taxes as interest expense or penalties expense. As of July 31, 2016, there have been no interest or penalties incurred on income taxes.

Basic Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Companys net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Companys net income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. Due to a loss for the year ended July 31, 2016 the outstanding options are anti-dilutive. The Company has more than one class of common stock outstanding. However, the dividend rate of each outstanding class of common stock is equal. Therefore, the net loss per common shares is the same for each class of common stock.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.  The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

The Company follows ASC Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods and Services, for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees.  In accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following as of July 31, 2016 and 2015:


July 31, 2016

July 31, 2015

Office equipment

$

3,663 

$

1,597 

Less: accumulated depreciation

(1,418)

(996)

Property and equipment, net

$

2,245 

$

601 


Depreciation expense totaled $422 and $319 for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


F-8

NOTE 5 DUE TO RELATED PARTIES

At JulyOctober 31, 2016, the Company is indebted to three directors of the Company for $1,050 (2015(July 31, 2016 - $250)$1,050) for expenditures incurred on behalf of the Company.  The amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

NOTE 6 4 LOANS PAYABLE RELATED PARTIES

As of JulyOctober 31, 2016, $960,967 (2015$970,243 (July 31, 2016 - $528,552)$960,967) is due to the majority shareholder, of which $508,531 is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand, $11,829 is past due with an interest rate of 3%, $57,767 is due December 31, 2016, with an interest at 3%, $95,600 is past due on October 26, 2016, with an interest rate of 2%, $107,240 is due on March 1, 2017, with an interest rate of 7% and, $180,000 is due on demand, with an interest rate of 4% and $9,276 is due on October 1, 2017, with an interest rate of 3%.  At JulyOctober 31, 2016, accrued interest on these loans is $14,068 (2015$18,810 (July 31, 2016 - $506)$14,068).

NOTE 7 5 LOAN PAYABLE

On January 30, 2014, the Company entered into a short-term loan with a non-related party.  The Company was loaned $6,000 from an investment company, the repayment terms are 3% interest with a maturity date of April 30, 2015.  The Company has repaid $2,597 as of JulyOctober 31, 2016. At JulyOctober 31, 2016, accrued interest on these loans is $277 (2015$303 (July 31, 2016 - $206)$277). At JulyOctober 31, 2016, this loan is past due.  

NOTE 8 6 CAPITAL STOCK

The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have the authority to issue is 12,207,000,000 (Twelve billion Two hundred and Seven million) shares, consisting of 12,007,000,000 (Twelve billion Seven million) shares of Common Stock having a par value of $.000001 per share and 200,000,000 (Two hundred million) shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of $.000001 per share.

Preferred Shares: 200,000,000 (Two hundred Million) par value $0.000001 per share. There are 1,800,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

Class A 7,000,000 (Seven Million Class A common shares) these shares have 1000:1 voting right compared to all other Class of shares and have equal dividend rights as all other Class of shares, par value $0.000001. There are 1,600,000 post-split shares of Class A common stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

Class B 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class B common shares) with voting and dividend rights, par value $0.000001 per share. There are 987,934,483 post-split shares of Class B common stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class C common shares) with no voting rights but with dividend rights, par value $0.000001 per share. The Company may issue these shares as it deems necessary, for the purposes including but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for the Company; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations. There are 4,800,000 post-split shares of Class C common stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

F-9

Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class D common shares) with no voting rights and no dividend rights, par value $0.000001 per share. The Company may issue these shares as its currency as it deems necessary, for the following purposes but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for the Company; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations. There are 48,000,000 post-split shares of Class D common stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in series and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.

The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:

A. The number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;

B. The dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and, if so, from what date or dates, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of that series;

C. Whether that series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

D. Whether that series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

E. Whether or not that series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates;

Whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of shares of that series, and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

G. The rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of the shares of that series; and

H. Any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.

On November 3, 2014, the Company effected a 4:1 forward stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock. As a condition of the split, all shareholders who wanted to participate were required to send $100 to the Transfer Agent to pay for the expense related to reissuance of shares due to split. The cutoff date for the return of the notification and payment to the transfer agent was December 31, 2014. If the shareholder did not return the confirmation and payment, they would not be eligible to receive the additional shares.

F-10

F-4


As of the date of this filing 99.71% of the shareholders participated and therefore the statements are retroactively adjusted to reflect a 3.99:1 forward split. Due to 3.99:1 forward split the shares increased to 938,192,724, the shares issuable to effect a 4:1 split is 2,736,000.  As a result, all share amounts have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented for a 3.99:1 forward split.

On December 30, 2014,August 4, 2016 the Company issued 62,000,000 post- split104,104 common shares to correct the amount of Class B common stock as a signing bonus pursuant to three employment agreements entered during the quarter ended January 31, 2015.  The Company recorded $15,500 of stock compensation for these issuances.

On December 30, 2014, the Companyshares issued 48,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to Mr. Shah Mathias (Company Founder) pursuant to the employment agreement dated October 2, 2014. The Company recorded $12,000 of stock compensation for these issuances.

On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 40,789,942 post-split shares of Class B common stock to employees as additional compensation. The fair value of these shares is $10,198 and is recorded as stock based compensation.  

On February 11, 2015, the Company issued 1,021,000 pre-split shares of Class B common stock to a director of the Company for services provided around March 27, 2014 and pursuant to the directorship agreement.  The Company recorded $1,021 as stock compensation for this issuance.  The Company also issued an additional 188,000 shares of Class B common stock on February 11, 2015 and 2,875,000 shares of Class B common stock on July 24, 2015 to account for the 4:1 stock split as the directorship agreement was entered prior to the effective date of the stock split.

On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 286,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock for services rendered to the Company in 2010.  The fair value of these shares is $71 and is recorded as stock based compensation.

On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 60,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to a shareholder who purchased shares fromas a third party.  The 60,000 post-split shares were not previously accounted for by the Company.

On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 9,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to three directorsresult of the Company pursuant to the Directorship agreements.  The fair value of these shares is $2,250 and is recorded asforward stock based compensation.

On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 1,708,960 post-split shares of Class B common stock as termination fee for an agreement in which the Company did not fully perform.  The fair value of these shares is $427 and is recorded as termination fee.

On July 24, 2015, the Company rescinded 530,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock that had been issued for services as those parties did not fully perform on their original contracts.  

During the year ended July 31, 2015, the Company reinstated 2,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock that were rescinded in error in the year ended July 31, 2014.  

On August 3, 2015, the Company reclassified 4,800,000 shares of Class A common stock to Class C common stock and reclassified 48,000,000 shares of Class B common stock to Class D common stock.

On August 3, 2015, the Company issued 20,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock as termination fee for an agreement in which the Company did not fully perform.  The fair value of these shares is $5 and is recorded as termination fee.

F-11

On August 3, 2015, the Company reinstated 20,000 shares of Class B common stock that were rescinded in error in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015.

On August 31, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to a director of the Company pursuant to directorship agreement entered on August 4, 2015.  The fair value of these shares is $250 and is recorded as directors fees.

On September 10, 2015, the Company issued 2,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to two directors of the Company pursuant to two directorship agreements entered on August 4, 2015.  The fair value of these shares is $500 and is recorded as directors fees.

On November 11, 2015, the Company rescinded 63,476,191 post-split shares of Class B common stock that had previously been issued to the former CFO for services as the former CFO did not fully perform on the original contract.

On November 11, 2015, the Company rescinded 880,952 post-split shares of Class B common stock that had previously been issued for services as the consultant did not fully perform on the original contract.split.

NOTE 9 7 STOCK OPTIONS

On March 8, 2016, the Company adopted a stock option plan named 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, the purpose of which is to help the Company secure and retain the services of employees, directors and consultants, provide incentives to exert maximum efforts for the success of the Company and any affiliate and provide a means by which the eligible recipients may benefit from increases in value of the common stock.  

On March 8, 2016, the Company granted 8,000,000 stock options to 4 officers and directors of the Company, exercisable at $42 per share and expire on March 8, 2026.  The 8,000,000 options vest according to the following schedule: 3,200,000 options vest immediately and 800,000 vest annually for the next 6 years.  The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the year ended July 31, 2016 was $0.00009.  During the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $369 (2015 - $nil), as officer payroll on the consolidated statement of operations.

A summary of the Companys stock option activity is as follow:


Number of Options

Weighted Average Exercise Price

$

Weighted Average Remaining

Contractual Term

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

$

Outstanding, July 31, 2014 and 2015








Granted

8,000,000

42.00








Outstanding, July 31, 2016

8,000,000

42.00

9.61


The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:


Year Ended

July 31,

2016

Year Ended

July 31,

2015




Expected dividend yield

0%

Expected volatility

150%

Expected life (in years)

10

Risk-free interest rate

1.83%


F-12

A summary of the status of the Companys non-vested stock options as of July 31, 2016, and changes during the year period ended July 31, 2016, is presented below:

Non-vested options

Number of Options

Weighted Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

$




Non-vested at July 31, 2014 and 2015




Granted

 8,000,000 

0.00009

Vested

 (3,200,000)

0.00009




Non-vested at July 31, 2016

 4,800,000 

0.00009


At July 31, 2016, there was $374 of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan.  There was $nil intrinsic value associated with the outstanding stock options at July 31, 2016.

NOTE 10 INCOME TAXES

For the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company has net losses in addition to prior years net taxable losses, the result is a net taxable loss carry-forward, and therefore the Company has no tax liability.  The net deferred tax asset generated by the loss carry-forward has been fully reserved. For the years ended July 31, 2016, and 2015, the cumulative net operating loss carry-forward from operations is approximately $21,786,000 and $13,995,000; respectively, and will expire beginning in the year 2030.

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:


July 31, 2016

July 31, 2015

Deferred tax asset attributable to:



  Net operating loss carryover

$

7,407,300 

$

4,758,300 

  Valuation allowance

(7,407,300)

(4,758,300)

  Net deferred tax asset

$                    

$                    


Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the net operating loss carry forwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations.

F-13

NOTE 11 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employee Agreements

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Executive Officer Debra Mathias with an effective date of April 21, 2014. The term of the employment agreements is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $1,200,000.

The Company has signed an employment agreement for the Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and as non-board member President, Mr. Shah Mathias (Company Founder), with an effective date of October 2, 2014. The term of the employment agreement is 20 years, with an annual base salary of $1,200,000 and ten percent (10%) of any revenue producing contract entered into by the Company while the Company Founder is in office, while holding any position under any title, and five percent (5%) of any such revenue producing contract afterward, for the benefit of the Company Founder or his estate, for a period of twenty (20) years. The Company Founder is also eligible to earn an annual bonus award of up to 100% of the annual base salary.  In addition, the Company Founder is entitled to receive shares of the Companys common stock as follows: when the Company issue shares for the Initial Public Offering, the Company Founder is to be issued 10% of the said shares; and if shares are issued at such time to any other party the Company Founder is to be issued an equal amount of shares.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the former Chief Financial Officer (the CFO) with an effective date of December 3, 2014.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $350,000.  The former CFO is also entitled to 60,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock as a signing bonus.  On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 60,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to the former CFO.  On November 11, 2015, the former CFO resigned and the Company rescinded 60,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock that had been issued as the former CFO did not fully perform on his employment agreement.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Engineer with an effective date of December 3, 2014.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $175,000.  The Chief Engineer is also entitled to 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock as a signing bonus.  On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to the Chief Engineer.

The Company has entered into a directorship agreement with a director of the Company with an effective date of June 30, 2015.  The initial term of the directorship agreement is one year, with an annual base salary of $150,000.  The director is also entitled to 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock. On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to the director.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreement was extended to July 31, 2021.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Financial Officer (the CFO) with an effective date of August 4, 2015.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $350,000.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreement was extended to July 31, 2021 and2021.  Effective November 1, 2016, the annual base salary was increased to $500,000.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Operating Officer (the COO) with an effective date of August 4, 2015.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $375,000.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreement was extended to July 31, 2021 and2021.  Effective November 1, 2016, the annual base salary was increased to $500,000.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with the Chief General Counsel with an effective date of August 4, 2015.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $500,000.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreement was extended to July 31, 2021.

The Company entered into eleven directorship agreements with eleven directors of the Company with an effective date of August 1, 2015.Company.  The initial term of the directorship agreements is one year, with an annual base salary of $150,000.  Each of the eleven directors is also entitled to 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock. On August 31, 2015 and September 10, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 post-split shares and 2,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to the three directors, respectively. On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreements was extended to July 31, 2021.

F-14On October 19, 2016, the Company appointed Robert Choiniere, Bryan Elicker, and Joseph Hackett as Directors of the Company and members of  its audit committee.   Effective November 1, 2016, the annual compensation for each of the members of the audit committee is $120,000.

 

F-5


NOTE 11 7 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Operating Lease

On April 30, 2014, the Company terminated its existing office space lease, and entered into a new month to month rent agreement for office space. The new agreement which commenced on November 1, 2015, calls for monthly rent payments of $1,440. The terminated lease agreement has not been resolved as to payment of existing amounts due in cash or stock, or as to any early termination fees.  As of JulyOctober 31, 2016, no stock has been issued in payment of rent.

Master Consulting Agreement

On March 20, 2016, the Company entered into a Master Consulting Agreement with Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc. (GIF&DA), a division of Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc.  Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. is a non-profit entity organized and established by the Founder of the Company.  GIF&DA has or is about to secure all necessary approvals by certain Joint Resolutions enacted by the federal and state(s) governmental agencies Legislature for the construction of a project consisting of financing, construction and operation of Hi Speed Rail Passenger, Freight, Air, Sea, Ground, Other Transportation Projects and other Parallel and Ancillary Infrastructure Projects.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company was appointed as the agent and representative of GIF&DA to facilitate GIF&DA in securing the first and future phases of financing the project and the construction of the project.  The Company shall receive 1.5% the face amount of each master trust indenture (bond indenture) in consideration for arranging financing and developing the sponsorship mechanism of the project.  The term of the Agreement shall continue until the completion of the project.  At JulyOctober 31, 2016, the Company has not secured any financing for GIF&DA.

Agreement for Construction and Agreement of Sale and or Assignment of Assets in Phase One

On August 8, 2016, Company entered into a Construction Agreement with Port De Claudius, Inc. (PDC). Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the Company shall perform all tasks and actions required to develop and construct the Port Trajan Pa. commercial properties (the Project) and to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering, and related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project.  

The Project consists of two phases, phase one closing to take place on or before October 14, 2016 (Phase One) and phase two to take place on or before August 31, 2017. Phase One consists of land purchase and onsite /off site improvement and its estimated cost, for both phases, is $2,000,000,000.  PDC agreed to pay the Company 40% of the cost (i.e $800,000,000), plus 2% over the adjustment for the increase in inflation regardless of the cost to the Company to perform the required services.  In no event will the profit to the Company from the amounts paid by PDC be less than $800,000,000.  A mobilization fee of $2,729,514 shall be due and payable by PDC to the Company upon the closing of Bond funding for Phase One. The bond proceeds from the first tranche will be $950,000,000.  

On September 11, 2016, in relation to the August 8, 2016 Construction agreement, the Company, Jewels Real-Estate 10-86 Master LLLP (Jewel), Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc. (GIF&DA), Port De Claudius, Inc., and HSRF Statutory Trust (HSRF) entered into an Agreement of Sale and or Assignment of Assets in Phase One pursuant to which the Company agreed to assign and Jewel agreed to sell all rights, title and interest in and to any contractual agreements entered among Ameri Metro, Jewel and other related parties to PDC on completion of Phase One as governed by the Construction Agreement.  The cost of Phase One is $950,000,000. The net Phase One revenue to the Company is $66,719,514 which includes $33,740,000 from the assignment of  the Land Purchase Agreement the Company entered into with Jewel on November 26, 2013, $14,250,000 in consulting fee in relation to the Master Consulting Agreement, $2,729,514 of mobilization fee and $16,000,000 of onsite / offsite improvement fee.  The $66,719,514 revenue will be paid from the proceeds from $950,000,000 bond issuance.  At October 31, 2016, the $950,000,000 bond has not been issued and the land has not been transferred from Jewel to PDC. 

 

Stock Split

In connection with the stock split, some shareholders did not respond or pay the transfer agent fee by the deadline. As a result, these shareholders were not issued the additional shares. At some point, the Company may be required to issue an additional 2,736,000 of Class B common stock in connection with this stock split.

NOTE 8 INCOME TAXES

For the period ended October 31, 2016, the Company has net losses in addition to prior years net taxable losses, the result is a net taxable loss carry-forward, and therefore the Company has no tax liability.  The net deferred tax asset generated by the loss carry-forward has been fully reserved. For the periods ended October 31 and July 31, 2016, the cumulative net operating loss carry-forward from operations is approximately $23,484,000 and $21,786,000; respectively, and will expire beginning in the year 2030.


F-6



NOTE 8 INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:









October 31, 2016

July 31,

2016

Deferred tax asset attributable to:



  Net operating loss carryover

$       7,984,700

$       7,407,300

  Valuation allowance

(7,984,700)

(7,407,300)

      Net deferred tax asset

$                    

$                    


Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the net operating loss carry forwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations.

NOTE 9 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the President of the Company with an effective date of November 1, 2016.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $650,000.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Risk Officer of the Company with an effective date of November 1, 2016.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $500,000.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the Vice CEO of the Company with an effective date of November 1, 2016.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $750,000.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the Treasurer of the Company with an effective date of November 1, 2016.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $600,000.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the Non-Executive General Manager of the Company with an effective date of November 1, 2016.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $160,000.

Effective November 1, 2016, the Company agreed to increase the base salary for the CFO of the Company from $350,000 to $500,000.

Effective November 1, 2016, the Company agreed to increase the base salary for the COO of the Company from $375,000 to $500,000.

On November 1, 2016, the Company granted 14,000,000 stock options to 7 officers and directors of the Company, exercisable at $42 per share and expire on November 1, 2026.  The 14,000,000 options vest according to the following schedule: 5,600,000 options vest immediately and 1,400,000 vest annually for the next 6 years.  


F-7


F-1



AMERI METRO, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET


July 31,
2016

July 31,
2015

ASSETS



Current assets



Cash and cash equivalents

$27,160 

$                      

Prepaid expenses

 8,678 




Total current assets

 35,838 




Office equipment, net

 2,245 

 601 

Prepaid expenses and deposits

 2,940 

 1,500 




Total Assets

$41,023 

$2,101 




LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT



Liabilities



Current liabilities



    Bank indebtedness

$                         

$528 

    Accounts payable

 1,069,608 

 272,972 

    Accrued expenses

 14,320,245 

 7,704,828 

    Due to related parties

 1,050 

 250 

    Loans payable related parties

 960,967 

 528,552 

    Loans payable

 3,403 

 3,403 




Total Liabilities

 16,355,273 

 8,510,533 




Stockholders Deficit



Preferred stock, par value $.000001, 200,000,000 shares authorized,
1,800,000 shares issued and outstanding (1,800,000 2015)

 2 

 2 

Common stock class A, par value $.000001, 7,000,000 shares authorized, 1,600,000 shares issued and outstanding (6,400,000 2015)

 1 

 6 

Common stock class B, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 987,934,483 shares issued and outstanding (1,093,876,626 2015)

 988 

 1,094 

Common stock class C, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 4,800,000 shares issued and outstanding (nil 2015)

 5 

Common stock class D, par value $.000001, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 48,000,000 shares outstanding (nil 2015)

 48 

Additional paid in capital

 5,581,929 

 5,595,967 

Stock subscriptions receivable

 (47,000)

 (47,000)

Accumulated deficit

 (21,850,223)

 (14,058,501)




Total Stockholders Deficit

 (16,314,250)

 (8,508,432)




Total Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit

$41,023 

$2,101 







The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-1






AMERI METRO, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



Year

ended

July 31, 2016

Year

ended

July 31, 2015




OPERATING EXPENSES



Professional fees

$

843,418 

$

37,400 

Directors fees

1,950,750 

1,339,868 

Depreciation

422 

319 

General & administrative

628,958 

460,918 

Officer payroll

4,354,536 

3,390,308 




TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

7,778,084 

5,228,813 




LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

(7,778,084)

(5,228,813)




OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)



Franchise tax recovery (expense)

(180,000)

Interest expense

(13,633)

(474)

Termination fee

(5)

(427)




TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

(13,638)

(180,901)




NET LOSS

$

(7,791,722)

$

(5,409,714)




LOSS PER SHARE (BASIC AND DILUTED)

$

(0.01)

$

(0.01)




WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING (BASIC AND DILUTED)

1,060,109,184 

1,016,009,671 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


F-2






AMERI METRO, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 AND JULY 31, 2015


Common Stock Class A

Common Stock Class B

Common Stock Class C

Common Stock Class D

Preferred Stock

Additional Paid in

Stock Subscription

Accumulated



Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Capital

Receivable

Deficit

Total
















Balance, July 31, 2014

6,400,000

$             6

934,526,724

$        935 

$             

$             

1,800,000

$             2

$ 5,554,659

$   (47,000)

$   (8,648,787)

$  (3,140,185)

Shares unissued per partial stock split

(6,051,000)

(6)

                     6

Shares issued for compensation

164,219,942

              164

            40,876

41,040

Shares issued for termination fee

1,708,960

                  2

425

427

Shares reinstated as shares were cancelled in error in 2014

2,000

Shares rescinded for services

(530,000)

                  (1)

                    1

Net loss

(5,409,714)

(5,409,714)












Balance, July 31, 2015

6,400,000

$             6

1,093,876,626

$      1,094

$             

$             

1,800,000

$             2

$ 5,595,967

$   (47,000)

$ (14,058,501)

$  (8,508,432)

Reclassification of Class B shares to Class D

(48,000,000)

(48)

48,000,000

48

Reclassification of Class A shares to Class C

(4,800,000)

(5)

4,800,000

5

Shares issues for partial stock-split

3,375,000

3

(3)

-

Shares reinstated as shares were cancelled in error in 2015

20,000

Shares issued for compensation

3,020,000

3

752

755

Shares cancelled

(64,357,143)

(64)

(15,156)

(15,220)

Stock-based compensation

369

369

Net loss

(7,791,722)

(7,791,722)












Balance, July 31, 2016

1,600,000

$            1

987,934,483

$        988

4,800,000

$            5

48,000,000

$          48

1,800,000

$             2

$ 5,581,929

$ (47,000)

$ (21,850,223)

$ (16,314,250)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


F-3


AMERI METRO, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



Year

ended

July 31, 2016

Year

ended

July 31, 2015

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES



Net loss

$ (7,791,722)

$   (5,409,714)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:



   Issuance of stock for services

750

41,040

   Issuance of stock for termination fees

5

427

   Cancellation of stock issued for services

(15,220)

   Depreciation expense

422

319

   Stock-based compensation

369




Change in operating assets and liabilities:



Prepaid expense and deposits

(10,118)

   Accounts payable

796,636

171,478

   Accrued expenses

6,615,417

5,149,951




Cash flows used in operating activities

(403,461)

(46,499)




CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES



Purchase of property and equipment

(2,066)




Cash flows used in investing activities

(2,066)




CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES



Bank indebtedness

(528)

528

Repayment of loan payable


(600)

Proceeds from related party loans

465,193

44,130

Repayment of related party loans

(32,778)

Due to related parties

800

250




Cash flows provided by financing activities

432,687

44,308




NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

27,160

(2,191)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR

2,191




CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR

$           27,160             

$                   




SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:



Interest paid

$                    

$                   

Income taxes paid

$                    

$                   




SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:



Issuable common stock Class B

$                    

$                   6




























The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

AMERI METRO, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016


NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

Ameri Metro, Inc. (Ameri Metro and the Company) was formed to engage primarily in high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related transportation projects.  The Company initially intends to develop a Midwest high-speed rail system for passengers and freight.  Currently the Company is engaged in raising capital and entering into relationships in furtherance of its planned activities.

The Companys activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties including failure to secure additional funding to properly execute the companys business plan.

NOTE 2 GOING CONCERN

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not generated any revenues since inception and is unlikely to generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. As at July 31, 2016, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $16,319,435 and has accumulated losses of $21,850,223 since inception. The ability of Ameri Metro to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company generating cash from the sale of its common stock and/or obtaining debt financing and attaining future profitable operations.

Managements plans include selling its equity securities and obtaining debt financing to fund its capital requirement and on-going operations; however, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in these efforts. These factors create substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for Ameri Metro, Inc. (AMI) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure, Inc. (GTI).   Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for the period reported include only the results of operations for AMI as GTI was not formed until December 1, 2010, and was inactive for the period from December 1, 2010 to July 31, 2016.

Accounting Basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP accounting). The Company has adopted a July 31 fiscal year end.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars.

Financial Instruments

According to FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Guidance under ACS 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:


 F-5

Level 1:

Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2:

Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, amounts due to related parties, loans payable, and loans payable to related parties. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate fair value due either to length of maturity or interest rates that approximate prevailing rates unless otherwise disclosed in these financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all short-term debt securities purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  

Property and Equipment

The capital assets are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method of depreciation for book purposes. Office equipment has a useful life of five years.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, the balances of which at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company continually monitors its banking relationships and consequently has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions considered to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ from the estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the prior-year financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform with the presentation in the current period statements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company has yet to realize significant revenues from operations and is still in the development stage.  The Company recognizes revenues when delivery of goods or completion of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers, the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable is collection is reasonably assured.

F-6

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method.  Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws.  A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized. It is the Companys policy to classify interest and penalties on income taxes as interest expense or penalties expense. As of July 31, 2016, there have been no interest or penalties incurred on income taxes.

Basic Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Companys net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Companys net income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. Due to a loss for the year ended July 31, 2016 the outstanding options are anti-dilutive. The Company has more than one class of common stock outstanding. However, the dividend rate of each outstanding class of common stock is equal. Therefore, the net loss per common shares is the same for each class of common stock.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensationwhich requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.  The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

The Company follows ASC Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods and Services, for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees.  In accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following as of July 31, 2016 and 2015:







July 31, 2016

July 31, 2015

Office equipment

$

3,663 

$

1,597 

Less: accumulated depreciation

(1,418)

(996)

Property and equipment, net

$

2,245 

$

601 


Depreciation expense totaled $422 and $319 for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


F-7


NOTE 5 DUE TO RELATED PARTIES

At July 31, 2016, the Company is indebted to three directors of the Company for $1,050 (2015 - $250) for expenditures incurred on behalf of the Company.  The amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

NOTE 6 LOANS PAYABLE RELATED PARTIES

As of July 31, 2016, $960,967 (2015 - $528,552) is due to the majority shareholder, of which $508,531 is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand, $11,829 is past due with an interest rate of 3%, $57,767 is due December 31, 2016, with an interest at 3%, $95,600 is due on October 26, 2016, with an interest rate of 2%, $107,240 is due on March 1, 2017, with an interest rate of 7% and $180,000 is due on demand, with an interest rate of 4%.  At July 31, 2016, accrued interest on these loans is $14,068 (2015 - $506).

NOTE 7 LOAN PAYABLE

On January 30, 2014, the Company entered into a short-term loan with a non-related party.  The Company was loaned $6,000 from an investment company, the repayment terms are 3% interest with a maturity date of April 30, 2015.  The Company has repaid $2,597 as of July 31, 2016. At July 31, 2016, accrued interest on these loans is $277 (2015 - $206). At July 31, 2016, this loan is past due.  

NOTE 8 CAPITAL STOCK

The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have the authority to issue is 12,207,000,000 (Twelve billion Two hundred and Seven million) shares, consisting of 12,007,000,000 (Twelve billion Seven million) shares of Common Stock having a par value of $.000001 per share and 200,000,000 (Two hundred million) shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of $.000001 per share.

Preferred Shares: 200,000,000 (Two hundred Million) par value $0.000001 per share. There are 1,800,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

Class A 7,000,000 (Seven Million Class A common shares) these shares have 1000:1 voting right compared to all other Class of shares and have equal dividend rights as all other Class of shares, par value $0.000001. There are 1,600,000 post-split shares of Class A common stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

Class B 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class B common shares) with voting and dividend rights, par value $0.000001 per share. There are 987,934,483 post-split shares of Class B common stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

Class C a/k/a Equity Participation Dividend Shares EPDS 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class C common shares) with no voting rights but with dividend rights, par value $0.000001 per share. The Company may issue these shares as it deems necessary, for the purposes including but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for the Company; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations. There are 4,800,000 post-split shares of Class C common stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.

Class D a/k/a Equity Participation Shares EPS 4,000,000,000 (Four Billion Class D common shares) with no voting rights and no dividend rights, par value $0.000001 per share. The Company may issue these shares as its currency as it deems necessary, for the following purposes but not limited to: purchasing goods and services for the Company; serving as an investment vehicle in acquisitions; for engaging in long term and short term joint ventures; for engaging in single purpose joint ventures; purchasing commodities, supplies, equipment and other tangible items for current and future projects; for engaging in like-kind exchanges as authorized by Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; for purchase of stocks and other securities; for purchase of real estate; for employee awards; and such other lawful purposes not in conflict with the said Board resolution, the Company Bylaws or applicable law and regulations. There are 48,000,000 post-split shares of Class D common stock outstanding at July 31, 2016.



F-8

The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in series and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.

The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of the following:

A. The number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series;

B. The dividend rate on the shares of that series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and, if so, from what date or dates, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of that series;

C. Whether that series shall have voting rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

D. Whether that series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

E. Whether or not that series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date or dates upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount per share payable in case of redemption, which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates;

Whether that series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of shares of that series, and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

G. The rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of the shares of that series; and

H. Any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.

On November 3, 2014, the Company effected a 4:1 forward stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock. As a condition of the split, all shareholders who wanted to participate were required to send $100 to the Transfer Agent to pay for the expense related to reissuance of shares due to split. The cutoff date for the return of the notification and payment to the transfer agent was December 31, 2014. If the shareholder did not return the confirmation and payment, they would not be eligible to receive the additional shares.

As of the date of this filing 99.71% of the shareholders participated and therefore the statements are retroactively adjusted to reflect a 3.99:1 forward split. Due to 3.99:1 forward split the shares increased to 938,192,724, the shares issuable to effect a 4:1 split is 2,736,000.  As a result, all share amounts have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented for a 3.99:1 forward split.

On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 62,000,000 post- split shares of Class B common stock as a signing bonus pursuant to three employment agreements entered during the quarter ended January 31, 2015.  The Company recorded $15,500 of stock compensation for these issuances.

On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 48,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to Mr. Shah Mathias (Company Founder) pursuant to the employment agreement dated October 2, 2014. The Company recorded $12,000 of stock compensation for these issuances.

On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 40,789,942 post-split shares of Class B common stock to employees as additional compensation. The fair value of these shares is $10,198 and is recorded as stock based compensation.  

On February 11, 2015, the Company issued 1,021,000 pre-split shares of Class B common stock to a director of the Company for services provided around March 27, 2014 and pursuant to the directorship agreement.  The Company recorded $1,021 as stock compensation for this issuance.  The Company also issued an additional 188,000 shares of Class B common stock on February 11, 2015 and 2,875,000 shares of Class B common stock on July 24, 2015 to account for the 4:1 stock split as the directorship agreement was entered prior to the effective date of the stock split.


F-9


On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 286,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock for services rendered to the Company in 2010.  The fair value of these shares is $71 and is recorded as stock based compensation.

On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 60,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to a shareholder who purchased shares from a third party.  The 60,000 post-split shares were not previously accounted for by the Company.

On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 9,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to three directors of the Company pursuant to the Directorship agreements.  The fair value of these shares is $2,250 and is recorded as stock based compensation.

On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 1,708,960 post-split shares of Class B common stock as termination fee for an agreement in which the Company did not fully perform.  The fair value of these shares is $427 and is recorded as termination fee.

On July 24, 2015, the Company rescinded 530,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock that had been issued for services as those parties did not fully perform on their original contracts.  

During the year ended July 31, 2015, the Company reinstated 2,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock that were rescinded in error in the year ended July 31, 2014.  

On August 3, 2015, the Company reclassified 4,800,000 shares of Class A common stock to Class C common stock and reclassified 48,000,000 shares of Class B common stock to Class D common stock.

On August 3, 2015, the Company issued 20,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock as termination fee for an agreement in which the Company did not fully perform.  The fair value of these shares is $5 and is recorded as termination fee.

On August 3, 2015, the Company reinstated 20,000 shares of Class B common stock that were rescinded in error in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015.

On August 31, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to a director of the Company pursuant to directorship agreement entered on August 4, 2015.  The fair value of these shares is $250 and is recorded as directors fees.

On September 10, 2015, the Company issued 2,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to two directors of the Company pursuant to two directorship agreements entered on August 4, 2015.  The fair value of these shares is $500 and is recorded as directors fees.

On November 11, 2015, the Company rescinded 63,476,191 post-split shares of Class B common stock that had previously been issued to the former CFO for services as the former CFO did not fully perform on the original contract.

On November 11, 2015, the Company rescinded 880,952 post-split shares of Class B common stock that had previously been issued for services as the consultant did not fully perform on the original contract.

NOTE 9 STOCK OPTIONS

On March 8, 2016, the Company adopted a stock option plan named 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, the purpose of which is to help the Company secure and retain the services of employees, directors and consultants, provide incentives to exert maximum efforts for the success of the Company and any affiliate and provide a means by which the eligible recipients may benefit from increases in value of the common stock.  

On March 8, 2016, the Company granted 8,000,000 stock options to 4 officers and directors of the Company, exercisable at $42 per share and expire on March 8, 2026.  The 8,000,000 options vest according to the following schedule: 3,200,000 options vest immediately and 800,000 vest annually for the next 6 years.  The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the year ended July 31, 2016 was $0.00009.  During the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $369 (2015 - $nil), as officer payroll on the consolidated statement of operations.


F-10


A summary of the Companys stock option activity is as follow:



Number of Options

Weighted Average Exercise Price

$

Weighted Average Remaining

Contractual Term

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

$

Outstanding, July 31, 2014 and 2015








Granted

8,000,000

42.00








Outstanding, July 31, 2016

8,000,000

42.00

9.61


The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:


Year Ended

July 31,

2016

Year Ended

July 31,

2015




Expected dividend yield

0%

Expected volatility

150%

Expected life (in years)

10

Risk-free interest rate

1.83%


A summary of the status of the Companys non-vested stock options as of July 31, 2016, and changes during the year period ended July 31, 2016, is presented below:

Non-vested options

Number of Options

Weighted Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

$




Non-vested at July 31, 2014 and 2015




Granted

8,000,000

0.00009

Vested

(3,200,000)

0.00009




Non-vested at July 31, 2016

4,800,000

0.00009


At July 31, 2016, there was $374 of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan.  There was $nil intrinsic value associated with the outstanding stock options at July 31, 2016.

NOTE 10 INCOME TAXES

For the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company has net losses in addition to prior years net taxable losses, the result is a net taxable loss carry-forward, and therefore the Company has no tax liability.  The net deferred tax asset generated by the loss carry-forward has been fully reserved. For the years ended July 31, 2016, and 2015, the cumulative net operating loss carry-forward from operations is approximately $21,786,000 and $13,995,000; respectively, and will expire beginning in the year 2030.

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:


July 31, 2016

July 31, 2015

Deferred tax asset attributable to:



  Net operating loss carryover

$

7,407,300 

$

4,758,300 

  Valuation allowance

(7,407,300)

(4,758,300)

      Net deferred tax asset

$                    

$                    


Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the net operating loss carry forwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations.

F-11

NOTE 11 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employee Agreements

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Executive Officer Debra Mathias with an effective date of April 21, 2014. The term of the employment agreements is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $1,200,000.

The Company has signed an employment agreement for the Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development, and as non-board member President, Mr. Shah Mathias (Company Founder), with an effective date of October 2, 2014. The term of the employment agreement is 20 years, with an annual base salary of $1,200,000 and ten percent (10%) of any revenue producing contract entered into by the Company while the Company Founder is in office, while holding any position under any title, and five percent (5%) of any such revenue producing contract afterward, for the benefit of the Company Founder or his estate, for a period of twenty (20) years. The Company Founder is also eligible to earn an annual bonus award of up to 100% of the annual base salary.  In addition, the Company Founder is entitled to receive shares of the Companys common stock as follows: when the Company issue shares for the Initial Public Offering, the Company Founder is to be issued 10% of the said shares; and if shares are issued at such time to any other party the Company Founder is to be issued an equal amount of shares.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the former Chief Financial Officer (the CFO) with an effective date of December 3, 2014.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $350,000.  The former CFO is also entitled to 60,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock as a signing bonus.  On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 60,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to the former CFO.  On November 11, 2015, the former CFO resigned and the Company rescinded 60,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock that had been issued as the former CFO did not fully perform on his employment agreement.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Engineer with an effective date of December 3, 2014.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $175,000.  The Chief Engineer is also entitled to 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock as a signing bonus.  On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to the Chief Engineer.

The Company has entered into a directorship agreement with a director of the Company with an effective date of June 30, 2015.  The initial term of the directorship agreement is one year, with an annual base salary of $150,000.  The director is also entitled to 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock. On July 24, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to the director.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreement was extended to July 31, 2021.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Financial Officer (the CFO) with an effective date of August 4, 2015.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $350,000.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreement was extended to July 31, 2021 and the annual base salary was increased to $500,000.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Operating Officer (the COO) with an effective date of August 4, 2015.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $375,000.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreement was extended to July 31, 2021 and the annual base salary was increased to $500,000.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with the Chief General Counsel with an effective date of August 4, 2015.  The term of the employment agreement is 3 years, with an annual base salary of $500,000.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreement was extended to July 31, 2021.

The Company entered into eleven directorship agreements with eleven directors of the Company with an effective date of August 1, 2015.  The initial term of the directorship agreements is one year, with an annual base salary of $150,000.  Each of the eleven directors is also entitled to 1,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock. On August 31, 2015 and September 10, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 post-split shares and 2,000,000 post-split shares of Class B common stock to the three directors, respectively.  On March 17, 2016, the term of the agreements was extended to July 31, 2021.


F-12

NOTE 11 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Operating Lease

On April 30, 2014, the Company terminated its existing office space lease, and entered into a new month to month rent agreement for office space. The new agreement which commenced on November 1, 2015, calls for monthly rent payments of $1,440. The terminated lease agreement has not been resolved as to payment of existing amounts due in cash or stock, or as to any early termination fees.  As of July 31, 2016, no stock has been issued in payment of rent.

Master Consulting Agreement

On March 20, 2016, the Company entered into a Master Consulting Agreement with Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc. (GIF&DA), a division of Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc.  Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. is a non-profit entity organized and established by the Founder of the Company.  GIF&DA has or is about to secure all necessary approvals by certain Joint Resolutions enacted by the federal and state(s) governmental agencies Legislature for the construction of a project consisting of financing, construction and operation of Hi Speed Rail Passenger, Freight, Air, Sea, Ground, Other Transportation Projects and other Parallel and Ancillary Infrastructure Projects.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company was appointed as the agent and representative of GIF&DA to facilitate GIF&DA in securing the first and future phases of financing the project and the construction of the project.  The Company shall receive 1.5% the face amount of each master trust indenture (bond indenture) in consideration for arranging financing and developing the sponsorship mechanism of the project.  The term of the Agreement shall continue until the completion of the project.  At July 31, 2016, the Company has not secured any financing for GIF&DA.  

Stock Split

In connection with the stock split, some shareholders did not respond or pay the transfer agent fee by the deadline. As a result, these shareholders were not issued the additional shares. At some point, the Company may be required to issue an additional 2,736,000 of Class B common stock in connection with this stock split.

NOTE 12 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On August 4, 2016 the Company issued 129,104 common shares to correct the amount of shares issued to a shareholder as a result of the forward stock split.

On August 8, 2016, Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement for construction (Construction Agreement) with Port De Claudius, Inc. (PDC). Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the Company shall perform all tasks and actions required to develop and construct the Port Trajan Pa. commercial properties (the Project) and to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering, and related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project. Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the specifications, designs, construction standards, subcontractor agreements, insurance requirements, hiring and employment policies and similar items shall be developed by the Company, subject to approval by PDC. The Company shall assure that the Project is constructed according to specifications and requirements imposed by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PADOT) and the Federal Highway Administration. The Company shall supervise all phases of the construction of the Project, and it shall be responsible to PDC for all acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, agents, consultants and other parties under its control. The Company shall be responsible for assuring that the construction of the Project is performed in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the highest standards of care for the industry.

The Project consists of two phases, phase one closing to take place on or before September 16, 2016 (Phase One) and phase two to take place on or before August 31, 2017. Phase One consists of land purchase and onsite /off site improvement and its estimated cost, for both phases, is Two Billion Dollars ($2,000,000,000), at cost plus forty percent (40%), plus two percent (2%) for the increase in inflation regardless of the cost to the Company to perform the required services. In no event will the profit to the Company from the amount paid by PDC be less than Eight Hundred Million Dollars ($800,000,000). A mobilization fee of $2,729,514 shall be due and payable by PDC to the Company upon the closing of Bond funding for Phase One.

F-15




F-13

NOTE 12 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (CONTINUED)

On September 11, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement of sale and or assignment of assets in Phase One (the Sale Agreement) with Jewel's Real-Estate 10-86 Master LLLP (the Seller), Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc., division of Hi Speed Rail Facilities Inc. (the Financier), PDC, and HSRF Statutory Trust as Trustee (the "Trustee"), as dictated by the Construction Agreement. The Sale Agreement was thereafter amended on September 13, 2016, in order to change the closing date of the transaction to October 14, 2016. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement, the Company and the Seller shall sell and assign all rights, title and interest in and to any contractual agreements to PDC on completion of Phase One, as governed by the Construction Agreement. The cost of Phase One is $950,000,000. The net Phase One revenue to the Company is $66,719,514.$66,719,514

.

On September 27, 2016, Company filed an 8K report in relation to the above transaction.


F-14


NOTE 12 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The following discussion is contingent on subsequent financing being obtained.

On August 8, 2016, Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement for construction (Construction Agreement) with Port De Claudius, Inc. (PDC). Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the Company shall perform all tasks and actions required to develop and construct the Port Trajan Pa. commercial properties (the Project) and to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering, and related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project. Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the specifications, designs, construction standards, subcontractor agreements, insurance requirements, hiring and employment policies and similar items shall be developed by the Company, subject to approval by PDC. The Company shall assure that the Project is constructed according to specifications and requirements imposed by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PADOT) and the Federal Highway Administration. The Company shall supervise all phases of the construction of the Project, and it shall be responsible to PDC for all acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, agents, consultants and other parties under its control. The Company shall be responsible for assuring that the construction of the Project is performed in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the highest standards of care for the industry.


The Project consists of two phases, phase one closing to take place on or before September 21, 2016 (Phase One) and phase two to take place on or before August 31, 2017. Phase One consists of land purchase and onsite /off site improvement and its estimated cost, for both phases, is Two Billion Dollars ($2,000,000 ,000), at cost plus forty percent (40%), plus two percent (2%) for the increase in inflation regardless of the cost to the Company to perform the required services. In no event will the profit to the Company from the amount paid by PDC be less than Eight Hundred Million Dollars ($800,000,000). A mobilization fee of $2,729,514 shall be due and payable by PDC to the Company upon the closing of Bond funding for Phase One.

On September 11, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement of sale and or assignment of assets in Phase One (the Sale Agreement) with Jewel's Real-Estate 10-86 Master LLLP (the Seller), Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc., division of Hi Speed Rail Facilities Inc. (the Financier), PDC, and HSRF Statutory Trust as Trustee (the "Trustee"), as dictated by the Construction Agreement. The Sale Agreement was thereafter amended on September 13, 2016, in order to change the closing date of the transaction to October 14, 2016. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement, the Company and the Seller shall sell and assign all rights, title and interest in and to any contractual agreements to PDC on completion of Phase One, as governed by the Construction Agreement. The cost of Phase One is $950,000,000. The net Phase One revenue to the Company is $66,719,514.

On September 21, 2016, the closing of the transaction took place.


F-15

F-16[IM NOT SURE WHY YOU EDITED THE JULY 31 FOOTNOTES WHEN WE NEED TO BE INCLUDING THE OCTOBER 31 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FOOTNOTES]


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


Not applicable.


ITEM 9A.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Pursuant to Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules.  This evaluation was done as of the end of the fiscal year under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys principal financial officer.  There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation.  Based upon that evaluation, the CFO believes that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are not totally effective in gathering, analyzing and disclosing information needed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its periodic reports is recorded, summarized and processed timely.  The officer is directly involved in operations of the Company.  The Company has hired outside professionals to assist in such preparation, analysis and filing.

Managements Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting


The Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys chief financial officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting  as of July 31, 2016, based on the criteria establish in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of July 31, 2016, based on those criteria. The Companys management has identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting related to the following matters:


A lack of sufficient segregation of duties. Specifically, this material weakness is such that the design over these areas relies primarily on defective controls and could be strengthened by adding preventative controls to properly safeguard company assets.


A lack of sufficient personnel in the accounting function due to the Companys limited resources with appropriate skills, training and experience to perform certain tasks as it relates to financial reporting.


The Companys plan to remediate those material weaknesses remaining is as follows:


Improve the effectiveness of the accounting group by continuing to augment existing resources with additional consultants or employees to improve segregation procedures and to assist in the analysis and recording of complex accounting transactions. The Company plans to mitigate the segregation of duties issues by hiring additional personnel in the accounting department once it generates significantly more revenue, or raises significant additional working capital.


Improve segregation procedures by strengthening cross approval of various functions including quarterly internal audit procedures where appropriate.


The independent registered public accounting firm has not issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting.


F-17








PART II


INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS




 ITEM 13   OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION


The following are our expenses related to our offering:

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee

 

$

6,954

 

 

$

6,954

 

Legal Fees

 

30,000

 

 

30,000.00

 

Accounting Fees

 

19,000

 

 

19,000

 

Printing and Engraving

 

1,200

 

 

1,200

 

Blue Sky Qualification Fees and Expenses

 

3,000

 

 

3,000

 

Transfer Agent Fee

 

2,000

 

 

2,000

 

Miscellaneous*

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 

$

67,154

 

 

$

67,154

 

* Estimated



ITEM 14.   INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

 

The Registrant is a Delaware corporation and the provisions of the Delaware General Corporate Law will be applicable to the indemnification the Registrant offers to its officer, director and agents. In its By-laws the Registrant generally agrees to indemnify each person who is a director or officer of the Registrant, or serves at the request of a director or officer as a director, officer, employee or agent of another company, in accordance with the Registrant's By-laws, to the fullest extent permissible by the Delaware General Corporate Law or other applicable laws. In its By-laws the Registrant indicates that, in connection with any such indemnification, it is within the discretion of the Board of Directors whether to advance any funds in advance of disposition of any action, suit or proceeding.

 

Under the Articles of Incorporation, the By-laws, and the Delaware General Corporate Law, no director of the Registrant will be personally liable to the Registrant or its stockholders for monetary damages, or expenses in defense of an action, for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Registrant, or serving in such capacity for another entity at the request of the Registrant, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the Registrant or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or there is reasonable cause to believe it was unlawful, or (iii) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. The Registrant has the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any persons potentially eligible for indemnification. The rights to indemnification are also applicable to those persons entitled to such rights by virtue of the Registrant's consummation of a business combination, including such consummations wherein the Registrant is merged into or reorganized as a new entity.


The foregoing description of available indemnification is a summary only, and is qualified in its entirety by the complete terms and provisions of the Delaware General Corporate Law and also the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation and By-laws, filed herewith as exhibits.


ITEM 15.    RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES


There have been no sales.


The Company has issued the following securities in the last three (3) years. All such securities were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering, as noted below.

127



ITEM 16.   EXHIBITS


3.1

Articles of Incorporation (filed with the Form 10 November 9, 2011)

3.2

Amended by-laws (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013)

*5.1

Opinion of Counsel on legality of securities being registered

10.1

Master Indenture Agreement of Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (filed with the Form 8-K January 18, 2013)

10.2

Master Indenture Agreement of Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. (filed with the Form 8-K January 18, 2013)

10.3

Master Indenture Agreement of Hi Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. (filed with the Form 8-K January 18, 2013)

10.4

June 12, 2012 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013)

10.5

TEMS engagement (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013)

10.6

Alabama Indenture Agreement (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013)

10.7

High Speed Rail Indenture Agreement (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013)

10.8

Damar Agreement (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013)

10.9

Alabama Legislative Act 506 (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013)

10.10

Form of subscription agreement for sale of the shares (filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed June 13, 2013)

10.11

Letter of Intent for Port Trajan property (filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed June 13, 2013)

*10.12

Intended use of Master Trust Indentures (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)Indentur

*10.13

Economic Impact Surface Transportation(filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)Transportation

10.13

Alabama House Joint Resolution H. J. R. 459 & H. J. R. 456 (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)Cost feasible plan modification

10.13

Fl Al LRTP summary report

10.13

Florida 2013

*10.14

Government Resolutions (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.14

ATFI joint resolution

10.14

GA House Resolution

10.14

Yuma

*10.15

Market Conditions for Bond Portfolio (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.15

Bain Brief 8 macro trends

10.15

Building Americas Future

10.15

Economic Mega Trends

10.15

Infrastructure 14 UK

10.15

Infrastructure 2013

*10.16

ARMT Pipeline TEMS Report (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)Ameri Metro Inc.

*10.17

Appalachian Regional Commission Corridor Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

*10.18

HSR Passenger Services Inc. for Florida-Alabama TPO Indenture (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

*10.19

ATFI 2016 Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

*10.20

Mobil Trade Corridor (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

*10.21

Atlantic Energy and Utilities Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.21

Energy Report

10.21

Hazardous Waste Report

10.21

Solid Waste Report

10.21

Waste Water Report

*10.22

High Speed Rail Facilities Inc. Master Trust Indenture Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

*10.23

HSR Freight and Passenger for Port Freeport Brazoria Texas Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.23

Free Port Attach Part A

10.23

Free Port Attach Part B

*10.24

High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc. Master Trust Indenture Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

*10.25

Port Ostia Air Cargo Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.25

Ameri Metro Oct 2014

10.25

Boeing Current Market Outlook

10.25

Boeing WCF

10.25

Port De Ostia Inc.

*10.26

Portus De Jewel Mexico Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.26

Ameri Metro Oct 2014

10.26

Final Report Yuma Rail

10.26

National Geo Spatial

10.26     Portus De Jewel Sept 2013

10.26

Yuma County

*10.27

KSJM International Airport Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.27

Aviation Report

10.27

KJS Airport Alabama

10.27

KJS Sarh Jewel Profile

*10.28

HSR Freight Line Inc Phil. Regional Port Authority Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.28

Governor Wolf announces next step in port Philadelphia Port Development

**10.29

HSR Freight Line Inc. Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.29

Highway Report

10.29

Ports Report

10.29

Rail Freight Civil Engine

**10.30

HSR Passenger Services, Inc. Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.30

Passenger Services

**10.31

HSR Technologies Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.31

Bridges Report

10.31

Composite C-Bar July 2012

10.31

Electricity Report

10.31

York Plant verses Rail Car

10.31

York Plant verses Rail Ties

**10.32

Malibu Homes Inc. Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.32

Port of Mobil

10.32

Town Center 28 Feb 2012

**10.33

Platinum Media Inc Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.33

Port of Mobile

10.33

Town Center 28 2012

**10.34

Port of De Claudius Inc Documents (filed with

10.34

Ameri Metro 2014

10.34

The emergence of the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)inland Port

10.34

Inland Port Views

10.34

Panama Canal Authority

10.34

Port of Mobile

10.34

Port Trajan

**10.35

Lord Chauffeurs LTD Documents (filed with the Form 8-K May 12, 2016)

10.35

KJS Airport Alabama

**10.36

Michigan COAST-TO-COAST PASSENGER RAIL Documents (filed with the Form 8-K/A May 12, 2016)

10.36

Coast to Coast Passenger Rail Ridership and Cost Study

**10.37

New York Washington HS Rail Corridor Documents (filed with the Form 8-K/A May 12, 2016)

**10.38

Port of Ostia Inc. Ann Charles International Cargo Airport Brazoria TxTax Indentures Documents (filed with the Form 8-K/A May 12, 2016)

10.38

New York to Wash DC

10.38

Ameri Metro 2014

10.38

Boeing Current Market

10.38

Boeing WACF

10.38

Port of Ostia Ann Charles

**10.39

Texas International Trade Corridor Documents (filed with the Form 8-K/A May 12, 2016)

10.39

Ameri Metro 2014

10.39

ATM Feasibility Assessment

10.39

HSR Logistic Inc. and HSRF

**10.40

Ameri Metro ARMT Overview Report (filed with the Form 8-K/A May 12, 2016)AMGTI

10.40

8K20160927 Period 20160806

**10.41

Land Purchase Agreement (filed with the Form 8-K/A May 12, 2016)

10.41

Agreement for Construction, Dated August 8, 2016

**10.42  

Master Consulting Agreement (filed with the Form 8-K/A May 12, 2016)

10.42

Agreement of Sale and or Assignment of Assets in Phase One Dated S

**10.43

Master Trustee Agreement

10.43

Exhibit A Material Asset of Acquisition

**10.44

Virginia Crescent Line Intercity Passenger

10.44

Exhibit B Summary of Closing Statement

**10.45

Agreement for Construction Ala. Toll Road.

**10.46

 Assignment agreement For Construction Alabama

**10.47

Payment Agreement to Penndel Land Co Alabama

**10.48

Marshall Technologies LLC Composite Rebar Manufacturing

**10.49

NPG Innovations Rail (filedRoad Tie Licensing Agreements

**10.50

US Rail Car Technology Use Agreement

**10.51

Opportunity License Agreements with the Form 8-K/A May 12, 2016)Affiliate Companies

**10.52

Master Agreement for Construction Cartel to ARMT

**10.53

Master Agreement for Construction Entities to ARMT

**10.54

Master Agreement for Consulting Agreement HSRFP to ARMT

**10.55

Master Agreement for Consulting Agreement HSRF to ARMT

**10.56

Employment Agreements

**10.57

Directorship Agreements

**10.58

Delaware Certificate of Amendment ARMT

**23.1

Consent of Accountants

*23.2

Consent of Counsel (included in Exhibit 5.1)

**99.1

ProAdvisor Valuation report, dated December 30, 2015 and(filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registration statement

                 on Form S-1, filed on November 23, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

**99.2

ProAdvisor Consent Letterconsent letter


128

*

Filed herewith


**

To be Filed on January 17, 2017 with S-1 Amendment 2

 

ITEM 17.   UNDERTAKINGS 

 

UNDERTAKINGS


The Registrant undertakes:


1.   Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to the director, officer and controlling person of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.


The Registrant is registering securities under Rule 415 of the Securities Act and hereby undertakes:


1.   To file, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:


(i)

Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;


(ii)

Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement; and notwithstanding the forgoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospects filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in the volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement.


(iii)

Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution.


2.   That, for the purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.


3.   To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.


4.   The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:

 

A.   For determining liability of the undersigned issuer under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned issuer undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned issuer pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned issuer will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

 

129

i.

Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned issuer relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

 

ii.

Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned issuer or used or referred to by the undersigned issuer;

iii.

The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned  issuer or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned issuer; and

 

iv.

Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned issuer to the purchaser.


B. That for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act to any purchaser:

 

Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

 

"Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") may be permitted to the director, officer and controlling person of the issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable."


In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the issuer of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the issuer in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the issuer will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

130



SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized in York, Pennsylvania on  November 23, 2016.January ____17_____, 201 6 7 .

 

AMERI METRO, INC.

By:  

/s/ Debra A. Mathias

Debra Mathias, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement was signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated.


/s/ Debra A. Mathias

Dated:  November 23,January ____ 17 _____, 2017 _________, 2016

Debra A. Mathias, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Principal Executive Officer





/s/ J. Harold Hatchett III

  J. Harold Hatchett III, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer





Dated: November 23,January ___ 17 ______, 2017 _________, 2016

/s/ James Becker

Dated:  November 23,January ___ 17 ______, 2017 _________, 2016

James Becker, Director


/s/ Shahjahan C. Mathias

Dated:  November 23,January ___ 17 ______, 2017 _________, 2016

Shahjahan C. Mathias, Director


/s/ Donald E. Williams, Jr.

Dated:  November 23,January ___ 17 ______, 2017 _________, 2016

Donald E. Williams, Jr., Director


/s/ Suhail Matthias

Dated:  November 23,January ____ 17 _____, 2017 _________, 2016

Suhail Matthias, Director


/s/ Steve Trout

Dated:  November 23,January _____ 17 ____, 2017 _________, 2016

Steve Trout, Director


/s/ Robert Todd Reynold

Dated:  November 23January ____ 17 _____, 2017 _________, 2016

Robert Todd Reynold, Director


/s/ Keith A. Doyle

Dated:  November 23,January ___ 17 ______, 2017 _________, 2016

Keith A. Doyle, Director


/s/ James Kingsborough

Dated:  November 23,January ___ 17 ______, 2017 _________, 2016

James Kingsborough, Director


/s/ J. Harold Hatchett III

Dated:  November 23January ___ 17 ______, 2017 _________, 2016

Harold Hatchett III, Director



/s/ Ronald Silberstein

Ronald Silberstein, Director



Dated:  November 23,January ____ 17 _____, 2017 _________, 2016

Ronald Silberstein, Director



/s/ John Thompson

Dated:  November 23,January ____ 13 _____, 2017 _________, 2016

John Thompson, Director



MCMURDO LAW GROUP, LLC

Matthew C. McMurdo | 917 318 2865 | matt@nannaronelaw.com



28 West 44 th Street, 16 th Floor

New York, NY 10036


131Exhibit 5.1



November 18, 2016 January __ 17 , 2017

Ameri Metro, Inc.

2575 Eastern Blvd. Suite 211

York, Pennsylvania 17402


Re:   Registration Statement on Form S-1 /A

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I am counsel for Ameri Metro, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), in connection with the proposed public offering by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of up to 1,000,000 Shares of its Class B common stock, $0.000001 par value per share (Common Stock), under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, through a Registration Statement on Form S-1 /A (the Registration Statement) as to which this opinion is a part, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In connection with rendering my opinion as set forth below, I have reviewed and examined originals or copies identified to my satisfaction of the following:

(1)   Articles of Incorporation, of the Company as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware;

(2)  By-laws of the Company;

(3)   Corporate minutes containing the written resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company;

(4)   The Registration Statement and the prospectus contained within the Registration Statement; and

(5)   The other exhibits of the Registration Statement.

I have examined such other documents and records, instruments and certificates of public officials, officers and representatives of the Company, and have made such other investigations as I have deemed necessary or appropriate under the circumstances.

In my examination, I have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of all natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to me as original documents and the conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to me as certified, conformed, facsimile, electronic or photostatic copies. I have relied upon the statements contained in the Registration Statement and certificates of officers of the Company, and I have made no independent investigation with regard thereto.

Based upon the foregoing and in reliance thereon, it is my opinion that the 1,000,000 Shares of Common Stock being offered by the Company under the Registration Statement, when sold, will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware and the laws of the United States of America.

I hereby consent to this opinion being included as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the use of my name under the caption EXPERTS in the prospectus constituting a part thereof.  

/s/ Matthew McMurdo, Esq.

Matthew McMurdo, Esq.


Exhibit 23.1



Weinberg & Baer LLC

115 Sudbrook Lane, Baltimore, MD 21208

Phone (410) 702-5660

Ms. Debra A. Mathias, Chief Executive Officer

Ameri Metro, Inc.

2575 Eastern Blvd., Suite 101

York, PA 17402

Dear Ms. Mathias:


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


We have issued our report dated November 3, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Ameri Metro, Inc. contained in the Registration Statement and Prospectus of Ameri Metro, Inc. on Form S-1 /A . We hereby consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the heading Experts.


Respectfully submitted,

[s1a1201701_r1059.gif]

Weinberg & Baer LLC

Baltimore, Maryland

November 16, 2016________________



Exhibit 99.1




[s1a1201701_r1060.jpg]

Business Valuation Report Prepared for:
Ameri Metro Inc. (ARMT)

Report prepared By:
Rocco Capuano Jr.
Investment Advisor Representative
ProAdvisor Investment Corp/ProAdvisor Capital Management
A Registered Investment Advisory Firm
1413 W. Market St.
York, PA 17404

Table of Contents


Letter of Engagement……………………..2

Information Source……………………….3

Company Overview………………..…….13
Industry Outlook…………………………15

Valuation Methodologies………………...17

Opinion of Value………………………....20

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1534155/000153415516000067/0001534155-16-000067-index.htm

Re: Letter of Engagement

November 1, 2016



Dear Mr. Mathias,

We have been engaged by your firm for the purpose of rendering a fair market value of your common stock for the purpose of bringing your company to market and likely the NASDAQ exchange. We will be evaluating your company supplied financial forecasts and projections going forward, exhibits you provided on projects that the company has in pipeline, as well as related industry qualitative reports and quantitative data in order to accuratly determine the value of your company.

ProAdvisor hereby gives full consent to the use of our valuat ion and other reports for the
u se of Am eri - Metro and it's management f or its professional use. Regards,

Rocco Capuano Jr.

Rocco Capuano Jr.
Investment Advisor Representative
ProAdvisor Capital / ProAdvisor Investment Corp
A Registered Investment Advisory Firm
1413 W. Market St.
York, PA 17404

Description of Valuation Assignment

ProAdvisor Investment Corp/ProAdvisor Capital has been retained by ARMT , to estimate the fair market value of the ARMT Common Stock for the purpose of being offered on a secondary market exchange.


The Scope of the Report

The Company considered the following in our valuation analysis:


·

Company provided financial projections and public filings and documents


·

The general economic outlook, the position of the industry in the existing economy, and the position of the business within its industry.


·

Related credible third party reports on industry specific data and projections


·

The book value and general financial condition of the business.


·

The earnings capacity of the business.


·

The companys capital structure, economic and control rights of various stake-holders.


·

The market price of stocks or assets of companies engaged in related activities where such stocks are traded on an exchange or over-the-counter.


Information Sources

The following sources of information were used in preparing the valuation:

1.

Company supplied financial statements and projections, SEC filings and other publicly available documents. Contracts and Letters of Intent both internally and from third parties to the Company and its subsidiaries (Alabama Toll Road Authority, Georgia State, and PA)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1534155/000153415516000067/ex1017hsrfreightincandhsrpas.htm
http://ameri-metro.com/files/SEC/ATFI%20RESOLUTION%20S%20J%20R%2056.pdf

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1534155/000153415516000067/ex1034porttrajanci81_pointof.pdf

https://trackbill.com/bill/ga-hr948-fulton-carroll-and-douglas-counties-high-speed-rail-transit-encourage/1171261/

2.

Global, national, regional, and local economic data were compiled and reviewed. The sources used included:

a.

ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) Infrastructure Report Card (2013)

http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/

b.

TEMS feasibility and research reports (2010-2015) http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1534155/000153415516000067/ex1034porttrajanci81_pointof.htm

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1534155/000153415516000067/ex1034porttrajanci81_pointof.pdf

c.

Boeing market outlook


http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1534155/000153415516000067/ex1025boeingcurrentmarketou.pdf

d.

KPMG Infrastructure Report

https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2012/11/infra100-world-markets.html

e.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Economic Report (2015)

http://www.pwc.com/us/en/capital-projects-infrastructure/publications/2014and2015outlook.html

f.

McKinsey Infrastructure Report (2014)

http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/infrastructure

http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/engineering_construction/new_horizons_for_infrastructure_investing

g.

Oxford Economics (2015-2025)

h.

BAIN & Company Inc. Brief (2011-2020)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1534155/000153415516000067/ex1015bainbreif8macrotrendsr.pdf

i.

Complete ARMT 8-K exhibits considered for this report but not necessarily included physically in this report for redundancy sake.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1534155/000153415516000067/0001534155-16-000067-index.htm

2

EXHIBIT 10.12 INTENDED USE OF MASTER TRUST INDENTURES

exhibit1012intendeduseofmast.htm

3

EXHIBIT 10.13 ECONOMIC IMPACT SURFACE TRANSPORTATION

ex1013hsrpassengerservicesin.htm

4

EXHIBIT 10.13

ex1013costfeasibleplanmodifi.htm

5

EXHIBIT 10.13 COST FEASIBLE PLAN MODIFICATION

ex1013costfeasibleplanmodifi.pdf

6

EXHIBIT 10.13

ex1013economicimpactsurfacet.htm

7

EXHIBIT 10.13 ECONOMIC IMPACT SURFACE

ex1013economicimpactsurfacet.pdf

8

EXHIBIT 10.13

ex1013flallrtpsummaryreporta.htm

9

EXHIBIT 10.13 FL AL LRTP SUMMARY REPORT

ex1013flallrtpsummaryreporta.pdf

10

EXHIBIT 10.13

ex1013florida201307231107078.htm

11

EXHIBIT 10.13 FLORIDA 2013

ex1013florida201307231107078.pdf

12

EXHIBIT 10.14 GOVERNMENT RESOLUTIONS

ex1014atfijointresolution459.htm

13

EXHIBIT 10.14 ATFI JOINT RESOLUTION

ex1014atfijointresolution459.pdf

14

EXHIBIT 10.14

ex1014gahouseresolution94815.htm

15

EXHIBIT 10.14 GA HOUSE RESOLUTION

ex1014gahouseresolution94815.pdf

16

EXHIBIT 10.14

ex1014yuma912ymposdemandresp.htm

17

EXHIBIT 10.14 YUMA

ex1014yuma912ymposdemandresp.pdf

18

EXHIBIT 10.15 MARKET CONDITIONS FOR BOND PORTFOLIO

ex1015bainbreif8macrotrendsr.htm

19

EXHIBIT 10.15 BAIN BRIEF 8 MACRO TRENDS

ex1015bainbreif8macrotrendsr.pdf

20

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex1015buildingamericasfuture.htm

21

EXHIBIT 10.15 BUILDING AMERICAS FUTURE

ex1015buildingamericasfuture.pdf

22

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex1015economicmegatrendsupto.htm

23

EXHIBIT 10.15 ECONOMIC MEGATRENDS

ex1015economicmegatrendsupto.pdf

24

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex1015infrastructure14uk.htm

25

EXHIBIT 10.15 INFRASTRUCTURE 14 UK

ex1015infrastructure14uk.pdf

26

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex1015infrastructure2013eyou.htm

27

EXHIBIT 10.15 INFASTRUCTURE 2013

ex1015infrastructure2013eyou.pdf

28

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex1015mgiinfrastructurefullr.htm

29

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex1015mgiinfrastructurefullr.pdf

30

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex1015rethinkinginfrastructu.htm

31

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex1015rethinkinginfrastructu.pdf

32

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex10152014northamerican3plce.htm

33

EXHIBIT 10.15

ex10152014northamerican3plce.pdf

34

EXHIBIT 10.16 AMERI METRO INC. PIPELINE TEMS REPORT

ex1016pipelineprojects_shahm.htm

35

EXHIBIT 10.17 APPLACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION CORRIDOR DOCUMENTS

ex1017hsrfreightincandhsrpas.htm

36

EXHIBIT 10.17

ex1017mobiletradeandtranspor.htm

37

EXHIBIT 10.17

ex1017mobiletradeandtranspor.pdf

38

EXHIBIT 10.18 HSR PASSENGER SERVICES INC. FOR FLORIDA-ALABAMA TPO INDENTURE

exhibit1018hsrpassengerservi.htm

39

EXHIBIT 10.19 ATFI 2016 DOCUMENTS

exhibit1019alabamatollfacili.htm

40

EXHIBIT 10.19

ex1019atfijointresolution45.htm

41

EXHIBIT 10.19

ex1019atfijointresolution45.pdf

42

EXHIBIT 10.19

ex1019roadsreport.htm

43

EXHIBIT 10.19

ex1019roadsreport.pdf

44

EXHIBIT 10.20 MOBILE TRADE CORRIDOR

ex1020hsrfreightincandhsrpas.htm

45

EXHIBIT 10.20

ex1020mobileetradeandtranspor.htm

46

EXHIBIT 10.20

ex1020mobileetradeandtranspor.pdf

47

EXHIBIT 10.21 ATLANTIC ENERGY AND UTILITIES DOCUMENTS

ex1021atlanicenergyandutitie.htm

48

EXHIBIT 10.21

ex1021drinkingwaterreport.htm

49

EXHIBIT 10.21

ex1021drinkingwaterreport.pdf

50

EXHIBIT 10.21

ex1021energyreport.htm

51

EXHIBIT 10.21 ENERGY REPORT

ex1021energyreport.pdf

52

EXHIBIT 10.21

ex1021hazardouswastereport.htm

53

EXHIBIT 10.21 HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORT

ex1021hazardouswastereport.pdf

54

EXHIBIT 10.21

ex1021solidwastereport.htm

55

EXHIBIT 10.21SOLID WASTE REPORT

ex1021solidwastereport.pdf

56

EXHIBIT 10.21

ex1021wastewaterreport.htm

57

EXHIBIT 10.21 WASTER WATER REPORT

ex1021wastewaterreport.pdf

58

EXHIBIT 10.22 HIGH SPEED RAIL FACILITIES INC. MASTER TRUST INDENTURE DOCUMENTS

ex1022highspeedrailfacilitie.htm

59

EXHIBIT 10.23 HSR FREIGHT AND PASSENGER FOR PORT FREEPORT BRAZORIA TEXAS DOCUMEN

ex1023hsrfreightandpassenger.htm

60

EXHIBIT 10.23

ex1023txfreeportattachparta.htm

61

EXHIBIT 10.23 FREEPORT ATTACH PART A

ex1023txfreeportattachparta.pdf

62

EXHIBIT 10.23

ex1023txfreeportattachpartb.htm

63

EXHIBIT 10.23 FREEPORT ATTACH PART B

ex1023txfreeportattachpartb.pdf

64

EXHIBIT 10.24 HIGH SPEED RAIL FACILITIES PROVIDER INC. MASTER TRUST INDENTURE DO

ex1024highspeedrailfacilitie.htm

65

EXHIBIT 10.25 PORT OSTIA AIR CARGO DOCUMENTS

ex1025gifdamastertrustindent.htm

66

EXHIBIT 10.25

ex1025amerimetrooctober2014.htm

67

EXHIBIT 10.25 AMERI METRO OCTOBER 2014

ex1025amerimetrooctober2014.pdf

68

EXHIBIT 10.25

ex1025boeingcurrentmarketou.htm

69

EXHIBIT 10.25 BOEING CURRENT MARKET OUTLOOK

ex1025boeingcurrentmarketou.pdf

70

EXHIBIT 10.25

ex1025boeingwacf.htm

71

EXHIBIT 10.25 BOEING WACF

ex1025boeingwacf.pdf

72

EXHIBIT 10.25

ex1025portdeostiainc0001.htm

73

EXHIBIT 10.25 PORT DE OSTIA INC

ex1025portdeostiainc0001.pdf

74

EXHIBIT 10.26 PORTUS DE JEWEL MEXICO DOCUMENTS

ex1026gifdamastertrustindent.htm

75

EXHIBIT 10.26

ex1026amerimetrooctober2014.htm

76

EXHIBIT 10.26 AMERI METRO OCTOBER 2014

ex1026amerimetrooctober2014.pdf

77

EXHIBIT 10.26

ex1026finalreportyumarailcor.htm

78

EXHIBIT 10.26 FINAL REPORT YUMA RAIL

ex1026finalreportyumarailcor.pdf

79

EXHIBIT 10.26

ex1026nationalgeospatialinte.htm

80

EXHIBIT 10.26 NATIONAL GEO SPATIAL

ex1026nationalgeospatialinte.pdf

81

EXHIBIT 10.26

ex1026portusdejewelsept2013.htm

82

EXHIBIT 10.26 PORTUS DE JEWEL SEPT 2013

ex1026portusdejewelsept2013.pdf

83

EXHIBIT 10.26

ex1026yaumacountyiga.htm

84

EXHIBIT 10.26 YAUMA COUNTY

ex1026yaumacountyiga.pdf

85

EXHIBIT 10.27 KSJM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DOCUMENTS

ex1027gifdamastertrustindent.htm

86

EXHIBIT 10.27

ex1027aviationreport.htm

87

EXHIBIT 10.27 AVIATION REPORT

ex1027aviationreport.pdf

88

EXHIBIT 10.27

ex1027ksjairportalabamaco001.jpg

89

EXHIBIT 10.27 KJS AIRPORT ALABAMA

ex1027ksjairportalabamaconce.htm

90

EXHIBIT 10.27

ex1027ksjsarahjewelprofileff.htm

91

EXHIBIT 10.27 KJS SARAH JEWEL PROFILE

ex1027ksjsarahjewelprofileff.pdf

92

EXHIBIT 10.28 HSR FREIGHT LINE INC PHIL. REGIONAL PORT AUTHORITY DOCUMENTS

ex1028gifdamastertrustindent.htm

93

EXHIBIT 10.28 GOVERNOR WOLF ANNOUNCES NEXT STEP IN PORT OF PHILADELPHIA DEVELOPM

ex1028governorwolfannouncesn.htm

94

EXHIBIT 10.28

ex1028governorwolfannounc001.jpg

95

EXHIBIT 10.29HSR FREIGHT LINE INC. DOCUMENTS

ex1029gifdamastertrustindent.htm

96

EXHIBIT 10.29

ex1029highwayreportnchrpsynt.htm

97

EXHIBIT 10.29 HIGHWAY REPORT

ex1029highwayreportnchrpsynt.pdf

98

EXHIBIT 10.29

ex1029portsreport.htm

99

EXHIBIT 10.29 PORTS REPORT

ex1029portsreport.pdf

100

EXHIBIT 10.29

ex1029railfreightcivilengine.htm

101

EXHIBIT 10.29 RAIL FREIGHT CIVIL ENGINE

ex1029railfreightcivilengine.pdf

102

EXHIBIT 10.30 HSR PASSENGER SERVICES, INC. DOCUMENTS

ex1030gifdamastertrustindent.htm

103

EXHIBIT 10.30

ex1030passengerservicestrans.htm

104

EXHIBIT 10.30 PASSENGER SERVICES

ex1030passengerservicestrans.pdf

105

EXHIBIT 10.31 HSR TECHNOLOGIES DOCUMENTS

ex1031gifdamastertrustindent.htm

106

EXHIBIT 10.31

ex1031bridgesreport.htm

107

EXHIBIT 10.31 BRIDGES REPORT

ex1031bridgesreport.pdf

108

EXHIBIT 10.31

ex1031compoitecbarjuly2012.htm

109

EXHIBIT 10.31 COMPOSITE C=BAR JULY2012

ex1031compoitecbarjuly2012.pdf

110

EXHIBIT 10.31

ex1031electricityreport.htm

111

EXHIBIT 10.31 ELECTRICITY REPORT

ex1031electricityreport.pdf

112

EXHIBIT 10.31

ex1031yorkpalntusrailcaramer.htm

113

EXHIBIT 10.31 YORK PLANT US RAILCAR

ex1031yorkpalntusrailcaramer.pdf

114

EXHIBIT 10.31

ex1031yorkplantrailties2010n.htm

115

EXHIBIT 10.31 YORK PLANT US RAIL TIES

ex1031yorkplantrailties2010n.pdf

116

EXHIBIT 10.32 MALIBU HOMES INC. DOCUMENTS

ex1032gifdamastertrustindent.htm

117

EXHIBIT 10.32

ex1032portofmobile.htm

118

EXHIBIT 10.32 PORT OF MOBILE

ex1032portofmobile.pdf

119

EXHIBIT 10.32

ex1032towncenter28feb2012.htm

120

EXHIBIT 10.32 TOWN CENTER 28FEB2012

ex1032towncenter28feb2012.pdf

121

EXHIBIT 10.33 PLATINUM MEDIA INC DOCUMENTS

ex1033gifdamastertrustindent.htm

122

EXHIBIT 10.33

ex1033portofmobile.htm

123

EXHIBIT 10.33 PORT OF MOBILE

ex1033portofmobile.pdf

124

EXHIBIT 10.33

ex1033towncenter28feb2012.htm

125

EXHIBIT 10.33 TOWN CENTER 28FEB2012

ex1033towncenter28feb2012.pdf

126

EXHIBIT 10.34 PORT OF DE CLAUDIUS INC DOCUMENTS

ex1034gifdamastertrustindent.htm

127

EXHIBIT 10.34

ex1034amerimetrooctober2014.htm

128

EXHIBIT 10.34 AMERI METRO 2014

ex1034amerimetrooctober2014.pdf

129

EXHIBIT 10.34

ex1034inlandporttheemergence.htm

130

EXHIBIT 10.34 THE EMERGENCE OF THE INLAND PORT

ex1034inlandporttheemergence.pdf

131

EXHIBIT 10.34 INLAND PORT VIEWS

ex1034inlandportviews.htm

132

EXHIBIT 10.34

ex1034inlandportviews001.jpg

133

EXHIBIT 10.34

ex1034panamacanalauthorityan.htm

134

EXHIBIT 10.34 PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY

ex1034panamacanalauthorityan.pdf

135

EXHIBIT 10.34

ex1034portofmobile.htm

136

EXHIBIT 10.34 PORT OF MOBILE

ex1034portofmobile.pdf

137

EXHIBIT 10.34

ex1034porttrajanci81_pointof.htm

138

EXHIBIT 10.34 PORT TRAJAN

ex1034porttrajanci81_pointof.pdf

139

EXHIBIT 10.35 LORD CHAUFFEURS LTD DOCUMENTS

ex1035gifdamastertrustindent.htm

140

EXHIBIT 10.35 KJS AIRPORT ALABAMA

ex1035ksjairportalabamaconce.htm

141

EXHIBIT 10.35

ex1035ksjairportalabamaco001.jpg

Complete submission text file

0001534155-16-000067.txt



Report Narrative

The purpose of this narrative is to walk the reader through the valuation report and to give both background and explanation to the seemingly unrelated pages. Thus giving cohesion to the myriad of projections, reports and helping paint a full picture of what this report is trying to convey in its entirety.

Business description is an encapsulation, and gives a 10,000-foot view of ARMT. The next few pages give corporate structure background as to the formation of the company and its reverse merger with Yellowwood. Also, the subsidiaries within the corporate umbrella and the non-profits (501 C-3s) within the fold to engage governmental agencies. ARMT owns 25% of each of its sixteen subsidiaries and acts as a manager for all projects, thereby having very low fixed and variable overhead comparatively (salaries, equipment payments, and insurance) while managing and ensuring completion of the project.

Segueing into the industry outlook are several excerpts from industry recognized expert opinions (both engineering and financial opinions) on the state of country wide infrastructure. The extreme lack of a viable and probable government funding to meet the growing demands of our infrastructure nationally. Additionally, an excerpt from Cranes about the P3 for LaGuardia Airport and their $5.3Bil
funding, bringing to light the resurgence of the P3 marketplace.

Following the industry supporting excerpts is our valuation methodologies and our overall opinion of value. Notwithstanding our valuation was based primarily on the Forward Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF) basis in large part due to the companys non-revenue generating status and non-traded basis. The companys work and contract pipeline is quite extensive with a pipeline of over $506 Billion in work to be performed and invoiced, which is expected to start in 2016/2017.

The opinion of value has been calculated primarily from the forward projections of the company with particular focus on the pipeline documents and contracts to support such a valuation. Using the FCFF formula: Total Business Value (under FCFF model) =FCFF Next Year/WACC g X 3.5 plus assets under contract (Mark to Market) applying the discount rate of 25% to the aggregate we have determined the stock value going forward.

The master consulting agreement is pivotal in providing the necessary cash flow to ARMT as the manager of all the projects for a 1.5% management fee and totaling over $506 billion in projects in the pipeline. Giving ARMT immediate income once the projects are booked and invoiced.

Along with the master consulting agreement is the most recent company 8-K summary, giving further explanation of upcoming projects in negotiation, and/or in process to start.

Following the 8-K summary are the numerous projects in the pipeline with substantial size to be commenced and completed (see 8-K exhibits).

Sheer size and scope of the ambition of ARMT and is undertaking with is staggering $506 Billion in P3 financing and projects in their pipeline. It would be understated if we did not explore the vastness of the P3 marketplace and the overwhelming need for the private sector to bring these enormous yet infrastructural necessary projects to market.

  ARMT has politically aligned and positioned itself as direct recipient of the Alabama and Georgia highway and HSR contracts. The State House of Representatives Resolutions actually naming ATFI  as the recipient of the contracts for both toll roads and HSR paving the way for High Speed Rail. Furthering the ARMT foothold to both legally, and politically propagate their pipeline.  Replicating this template, yet again ARMT has engaged the ARC (Appalachian Regional Commission) which includes 13 states, to discuss their project needs and is currently under negotiation and planning.

Port de Jewel, Yuma County Arizona/Baja Mexico is also a project in the pipeline and is probably the most massive in scale with exception to Port Ostia (KSJM airport). Together with Inchcape, a world class shipping company with offices in 112 countries and 1,533 ports of call are also in negotiation with ARMT for shipping contracts for the ports ARMT is proposing. Including Port de Jewel on the Baja peninsula of Mexico and a railway system to transport the cargo into the United States. This will be the most advanced shipping port in the world with the largest ship slips and water depth, to accommodate the new class of Panama Canal ships being used and designed for the future. Gaining priority and preference over Port of Longbeach south of Los Angeles.

The master indenture agreement and master consulting agreement for the company are cornerstones for the projects in the pipeline. One of the major contract vehicles to generate revenue for ARMT. An exhibit is taken from the most recent 8-K, as an example for all the pipeline projects as described in the company projections.

As with any venture, investors want to know what their investment will be used for. The Use of Proceeds table explains the use of funds raised during the IPO and beyond as part of the business plan, it lays out the funds according to the percentage of subscription of stock, which gives transparency and accountability to the investor.

The remainder of the report exhibits is a plethora of supporting documents from industry expert reports (Bain, Boeing, Mckinsey, PricewaterhouseCoopers etc.) to substantiate our findings.

The accumulation of the industry reports (contained herein and in the 8-K exhibits) and the needs for infrastructure investment and development give a better compositional and compelling picture of what ARMT has put in place to accomplish its goal of Changing the Way You Move.

Business Description

The enigmatic and nebulous term of infrastructure is widely used and often misunderstood.  ARMT is comprised of 14 different and distinct subsidiaries and 4 strategic non-profit entities to interact and engage with federal, state and local governments. Each non-profit with a specific purpose to perform as a standalone entity and also to feed the corporate whole.  Bringing about a Public/Private Partnership (PPP) approach to privately finance, design, develop, and manage a traditionally government funded arena, in a massively underserved and anemically funded industry as a whole.

A Standard Industrial Code (SIC) of 1600 for Heavy Construction, the company is structured to design, finance, develop, supply, and complete the infrastructure transportation projects it undertakes utilizing Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP). Then in most cases to turn over said project to the municipality upon maturity of the bonds, but retain certain rights and both ancillary and adjoining business interests developed by the project. Therefore, creating a Private-Public-Partnership win-win; creating jobs, easing congestion on road ways, rail ways, and shipping ports, while reducing carbon emissions and leaving a better economic footprint behind for that area to thrive.  

According to the company website, The company is designed as a multi-faceted development company committed to bringing innovative design and independent financing to the construction of high-speed rail for passenger and freight transportation and related projects nationwide. ARMT anticipates that it will, directly or through subsidiaries, and affiliated companies develop plans, and then coordinate and supervise the financing, construction and development of such transportation projects by bringing together the resources, plans, financing, approvals and technology needed to implement the high-speed rail services.

To summarize ARMT, they are a bridge between governments and the private sector servicing both by designing, building, financing, and managing large transportation construction needs with innovative and modern technological transportation solutions from High Speed Rail (HSR) to state of the art intermodal ports (Port Trajan, Portus de Jewel, Port Ostia, etc.).

Limited Distribution

The company prepared the valuation from its own internal sources.


Company Overview

ARMT is a mezzanine stage developmental company designed to focus on high-speed rail and other transportation services for passenger and freight transportation as well as related and ancillary transportation businesses. The Company anticipates that it will provide various services for high-speed rail throughout the United States. ARMT intends to secure manufacturing and technologies together with ancillary land development projects, sale of goods and services to government, civilian and commercial end users.

The company was incorporated on April 13, 2010. The company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes 113,000,000 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share.

Public Status

On June 12, 2012, ARMT , a Delaware corporation, merged with Yellowwood Acquisition Corporation. As part of the merger, Yellowwood Acquisition Corporation, the surviving entity, changed its name to ARMT. Yellowwood has an authorized capitalization of 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Prior to the merger, Yellowwood had no ongoing business or operations and was established for the purpose of completing mergers and acquisitions with a target company, such as the former ARMT. Pursuant to the merger, all the outstanding shares of ARMT  common stock were exchanged for an aggregate of 12,667,421 shares of Yellowwood common stock on a pro rata basis in accordance with each holder's relative ownership of ARMT.


Since its incorporation, the Company has developed its business plan, appointed officers and directors, engaged initial project consultants and entered into negotiations and contracts for related and ancillary business. The company is currently developing proposals for the high-speed rail services in both Alabama and Georgia. The company believes that the need, demand and usage of alternative transportation such as high speed rail are increasingly important as the United States adopts policies to attempt to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels, particularly from the automobile.


ARMT and its wholly owned subsidiary, Global Transportation and Infrastructure, Inc., were formed to provide a global economic engine to supply the know-how and to curb the financial burden on the governments and tax payer alike to keep up with provide maintenance and replacement of the countrys transportation infrastructure.

The Founder of the Company, Shah Mathias, has organized and established three nonprofit corporations and is a facilitator of a forth nonprofit (ATFI) for the purpose of facilitating the development of the transportation systems. The nonprofit statutes provide a vehicle to issue bonds and to help secure infrastructure projects. The nonprofits have the discretion to turn over the infrastructure projects to a state or governing body having jurisdiction after the indebtedness has been paid. The nonprofits that Mr. Mathias has created are:


1) Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (ATFI)

2) Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. (HSRF)

3) Hi Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. (HSRFP)

4) Global Transportation Infrastructure Development and Finance Authority

:

To support the functionality of financial structure, sixteen for profit entities have been placed under the ARMT umbrella to carry out its defined task for each segment of operation. The company will act as a facilitator for the four not-for-profit entities. In return for these management services, the company will receive a payment of 30% on top of all payment made by ATFI, HSRF, HSRFP, and GIF & DA to the sixteen for profit entities. The company will also receive a facilitation fee of 1.5% of each bond issuance for ATFI, HSRF, HSRFP, and GIF & DA totaling.

Toll Highways

In 2007, and again in 2015, the toll road project was presented to the Alabama legislature which on June 7, 2007, adopted Act No. 2007- 506 entitled "Expressing Support for the Alabama Toll Road Project". This Act stated that it recognized the need to utilize other financial resources to meet the needs of highways and other infrastructure items such as that offered by ATFI. The Act urged approval of the bonds offered by ATFI as special revenue bonds with the project eventually vesting to the state upon maturity/calling of the bonds. The Act further supports designating ATFI as the exclusive entity for creation and development of the toll road project. The Act was revisited and resigned in 2015 furthering the need for the project and fortifying the companys position.

Industry Outlook

With the current fall in energy prices and relatively lax government constraints, the current Infrastructure environment is rebounding. Albeit, a bleakly funded market from a governmental standpoint, the public-private- partnership arena is the only way foreseeable to accomplish the infrastructure needs of the affected states, municipalities and this country.

The following are excerpts from several highly credible reports to substantiate and codify the necessity for infrastructure improvement as well as the market size and scope in the US and Globally.

Current example of the success of Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) landscape

Port Authority Approves Plans To Rebuild LaGuardia Airport, East Elmhurst

BY:REID WILSON 6:00 AM ON MARCH 25, 2016

In the summer of 2015, plans to build a new LaGuardia Airport were revealed along with other transportation infrastructure, including a 24-hour ferry service and an AirTrain, that would serve to link the East Elmhurst airport to the rest of the city. The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (PANYNJ) has officially approved the project, which was recently estimated tocost upwards of $5.3 billion, Crains reported. As part of the deal to approve the project, the Port Authority agreed that it redevelop the Port Authority Bus Terminal in Manhattan, shooting down any chance that it would be rebuilt for much cheaper in New Jersey. As for the airport, the Central Terminal Building is phase one of the greater redevelopment and is expected to be finished by 2021. Terminals C and D will be built after that.

ASCE Report Card on our current Infrastructure (pg. 1)

Every four years, the American Society of Civil Engineers Report Card for Americas Infrastructure depicts the condition and performance of the nations infrastructure in the familiar form of a school report cardassigning letter grades based on the physical condition and needed investments for improvement. The 2013 Report Card grades show we have a significant backlog of overdue maintenance across our infrastructure systems, a pressing need for modernization, and an immense opportunity to create reliable, long-term funding, but they also show that we can improve the current condition of our nations infrastructure.


Bain Brief (pg. 3)

Macro trend: Old infrastructure, new investments. In the advanced economies, renewed economic vitality will require refurbishing and expanding critical infrastructure, much of which was built more than a half century ago. But with public finances under strain, the job will increasingly present opportunities for public private partnerships. In emerging economies, continued infrastructure development will be needed to accommodate growth and lay a foundation for future expansion. Estimated contribution to global GDP by2020: $1 trillion.


KPMG Infrastructure 100 Report (pg. 13)

Historically, economic powerhouses have used public money or some form of debt security issued by the state to fund developments. However, the scale of the required investment means that government finance alone is insufficient and public institutions lack the critical capacity of qualified people needed to deliver. Therefore, the private sector needs to play an increasingly important role in delivering and financing critical projects. Whether the conditions exist to attract international private capital is open to question. Current flows are often limited by strong domestic competition, a lack of transparent tenders and considerable restrictions on inward investment, with further fears over resource nationalism. As a result, there are fewer direct greenfield opportunities in these markets for international private investors to consider. This is an issue economic powerhouses need to address if they are serious about attracting international investment and expanding the role of the private sector and the use of public-private partnership (PPP) models.


PwC Infrastructure 2014 & 2015 Outlook (pg. 9)

Investors continued to find P3 deals scarce in 2014, but generally feel positive about 2015 because of new states starting to participate in P3s. Its a year that has great potential as the market expands to new geographies and new asset classes, says Dionisio of Meridiam Infrastructure. Road transportation will continue to be fruitful, and were hoping that the rail marketwith the Purple Line in Marylandwill help diversify the market. We will also see selected social infrastructure deals emerge as well in the short- to mid-term.3

In a January 16, 2015, blog post, the White House said America certainly needs more private investment in its aging roads, bridges, rail lines, and water and sewer systems. The White House said an estimated $3.6 trillion would be required to update Americas infrastructure by 2020.6

But political risks continue to make many investors wary of P3s, some of which get derailed before the deal can be closed. Hastings Funds Management has invested in P3s in Australia and other countries, but not the US because of such risk and uncertainty. We would like to see more certainty around the transaction processes in the US, says Mavroyannis of Hastings. That means providing certainty around political risk upfront through the structuring of the transaction.


Oxford Economics

Capital project and infrastructure spending Outlook to 2025 (pg. 2)

By 2025, annual investment in infrastructure across our sectors in the US should top $1trn, having grown by an average of just over 3.5%a year. But the US will likely have been long since left behind by China, where we expect annual spending will reach over three times this level. We estimate that the USs share of global spending will likely decline gradually over the coming decade to just over a tenth of total global spending by 2025.


Valuation Methods

Three primary approaches that we used to determine the value of the Company are: the net asset approach, the income approach, and the capitalized earnings approach. The factors that contributed to the valuation methodology selection and weightings include Companys business, industry, and availability of the relevant market data or Companys financial information. We weighed heavily on primarily the Income Valuation due to the companys non-traded status as of yet.


Net Asset Approach

The net asset value approach is used in an entity which primarily owns assets. The net asset value is calculated by total assets minus intangible assets and liabilities. The Company reached an agreement to purchase 1132 acres with Rail and I-81 access.  After exercising the right to purchase the land, the property will be recorded as an asset. Conservatively estimating the per acre value at $350,000 per acre with current horizontal improvements we calculate the property to have a value of $396,250,000.


Income Approach

We utilized the Discounted Cash Flow Method, a form of Income Approach, to estimate the equity value of the Company. The Discounted Cash Flow Method is an income-based approach rooted in the theory that the total value of a business is the present value of its projected future earnings, plus the present value of the terminal value. The projected future earnings and the terminal value are discounted back to the Valuation Date using an appropriate discount rate of 25%.


Capitalized Earnings Approach

The capitalized earnings approach utilizes the return on investment that is expected by an investor to discount the earnings of a company. The capitalization rate is directly proportional to the level of perceived risk by investors. The company has no earning, there for the value given using this approach is $0.


Total assets of the company are $18,306 as of this report as compared to total assets of $4,611 as of July 31, 2014. Total current assets on July 31, 2015 was $16,365 as compared to assets of $2,191 as of July 31, 2014.

Total assets of the Company were $2,101 as at July 31, 2015 as compared to total assets of $4,611 as at July 31, 2014.  Total current assets at July 31, 2015 was $ nil, as compared to current assets of $2,191 as at July 31, 2014.

Total operating expenses increased to $5,228,813 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015 from $2,792,479 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014.  The increase was due to additional accrual of directors fees and officer payroll during the year ended July 31, 2015. Loss from operations was $5,228,813 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015 compared to $2,792,479 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2014.


Liquidity: the company has no continuous methods of generating cash until operations of Port Trajan are realized, and the sale of its stock.

Capital Resources: the company did not incur any capital expenditures other than the purchase of office supplies and computer equipment.

Results of Operations: the company completed no sales and received no revenues since inception other than from the sale of its securities. The Company does not anticipate that it will generate revenue sufficient to cover its operating expenses until a capital infusion for its first project, slated for 2016. As of July 31, 2015, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $8,510,533 and has accumulated losses of $14,058,501 since inception.


Projected Financial Information

Management completed financial projections for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2015 to July 31, 2022. The Companys revenue is projected to increase from $8.39 billion in FY2016 to $33.59 billion in FY2022. While the Companys gross profit is projected to rise from a net income of $1.85 billion in 2016 to $7.42 billion in FY2022. Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) is projected to change as stated above, Taxes, estimated at a combined rate of 35% in years of operating profit, were deducted from EBIT.



Discounted Cash Flows

The goal of the Discounted Cash Flow Method is to arrive at net cash flow to invested capital, which is calculated as net operating income after taxes; plus, non-cash charges (such as depreciation and amortization); less capital expenditures; and less (plus) increases (decreases) in net working capital. Depreciation, capital expenditures, and net working capital requirements were estimated through the use of industry averages because the Company determined its revenue projections. The value of projected cash flows from year ended July 31, 2015 to year ended July 31, 2017, is approximately $7.38 billion (EBITDA) using a discount rate of 25.0%.


Terminal Value

We calculated the Companys terminal value based on Gordon Growth formula that estimates the value of terminal free cash flows in perpetuity. Assuming the terminal growth rate remains constant, the value of the free cash flows equals to the value of free cash flows in the first terminal year capitalized at the Discount Rate minus terminal growth rate of return. Given the industry dynamic and the long-term economic outlook we selected the terminal growth rate at 3.0%. With the free cash flows of $1.246 billion and capitalization rate of 20.0%, the Terminal Value in FY2018 was calculated at $24.9 billion.


Equity Asset Value

Management calculated the equity value of the company as the sum of the present value of future cash flows and the present value of the terminal value, plus an estimated net loss from inception of ($1.6 million), minus a contractual payment to a related party of upfront investment required of $65,000,000. In conclusion, the equity value under Discount Cash Flow Method on the marketable non-controlling basis is projected as FY 2016/17 of $6.245 Billion.


The value of projected cash flows from year ended July 31, 2016 to year ended July 31, 2023, plus the prior accumulated deficit from inception, is approximately $25.198 billion, applying a discount rate of 25.0%.


Discount Rate

Management examined published data on the expected rate of return by venture capitalists investing in companies at different stages of their development (see table below). Management classified the company as being beyond the start-up stage. The Seiffer Software Study2 and Scherlis and Sahlman3 Study reported rates of return ranging from 40-80% for start-up stage companies. The Plummer Study4 reported rates ranging from 50-70% for those companies that are in the development stage. Based on an analysis of the risks facing the company, the revenue projections provided and our classification of the company, management believes that the appropriate discount rate [value] for the Company is 25% because of the overall structure and margins for profit as well as its mezzanine stage.


[s1a1201701_r1062.gif]



Market for Securities


Following the registration of the company's common stock for public trading, the Company will apply for admission to quotation of its securities on the NASDAQ (National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations Board). There currently are public markets for the companys securities as their competitors exhibit. (Notably FLR, GLDD, CBI, & SHAW)


We have also been made aware of several private sales, the most recent on 10/6/16 of company stock from an original investor in ARMT. The stock was offered and accepted at $60.00 per share. Demonstrating the perceived value and not only market acceptance, but the burgeoning of a resurgence in infrastructure as a whole and the company stock.

Opinion Of Value

Assumptions:

1.

That the initial bonds in the portfolio are rated A+, A1 or better.

2.

That ARMT projections are accurate and can be executed in the time frames given.

3.

That the governing bodies ARMT (or their subsidiaries) are engaging can move in a efficient and expedious manor and in the timelines provided herein.


Several factors were considered during this opinion; the extensive partnerships and plans ARMT has in place, and according to GAP the ability to invoice and book the projects when they execute the master indentures. According to management, are projecting a FCFF of $2.85 Billion in 2016 & 2017.  Also a 7 year FCFF of $209.9 billion (total). Considering the overall financial projections of the Company over the next 7 years with a projected net FCFF of $42.2 Billion.  
Applying a discount rate of 25% equates to a FCFF of $2.137 Billion in 2016/17 and a 7 year FCFF of $157.425 Billion overall. The P3 Bond Indenture contracts in the pipeline of over $506 Billion already under the Master Indenture, that coupled with the physical asset under contract of $396,250,000.00 from the Port Trajan Project (Phase 1). Anticipating a bond rating of A+ - AA+  for the underlying project indenture bonds, supplanting the current book value, and using an industry conservative average multiple of 3.5 X future earnings, and it is our opinion that the Class B common shares (113,000,000) have a value of thirty eight ($38.00) dollars per share on a Forward Cash Flow For Firm basis.