QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 3,5, 2005

Registration No. 333-120187



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


AMENDMENT NO. 34 TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


CELANESE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation)
 2673
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
 98-042076
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1601 West LBJ Freeway
Dallas, TX 75234-6034
(972) 443-4000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrants' principal executive offices)
Secretary
550 U.S. Highway 202/206
Bedminster, NJ 07921-1590
(908) 901-4500

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

With copies to:

Edward P. Tolley III, Esq.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017-3954
(212) 455-2000
 Richard D. Truesdell, Jr., Esq.
Davis Polk & Wardwell
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
(212) 450-4000

        Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:    As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective.

        If any of the securities being registered on this Form are being offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.    o

        If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

        If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

        If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

        If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.    o


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title of Each Class of
Securities to be Registered

Title of Each Class of
Securities to be Registered

 Amount to be Registered
 Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price Per Share
 Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price(1)

 Amount of Registration Fee(2)
Title of Each Class of
Securities to be Registered

 Amount to be Registered
 Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share
 Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price(1)

 Amount of Registration Fee(2)

Series A Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share(3)Series A Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share(3) 57,500,000 shares $21 $1,207,500,000 $151,122.75Series A Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share(3) 57,500,000 shares $21 $1,207,500,000 $151,122.75

Preferred Stock Purchase Rights(4)Preferred Stock Purchase Rights(4)    Preferred Stock Purchase Rights(4)    

Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per shareConvertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share 8,000,000 shares $25 $200,000,000 $23,540Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share 8,000,000 shares $25 $200,000,000 $23,540

Series A Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share(5)Series A Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share(5) 8,333,333 shares   Series A Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share(5) 8,333,333 shares   

Total     $1,407,500,000 $174,662.75Total     $1,407,500,000 $174,662.75


(1)
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee under Rule 457(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act").

(2)
Includes $126,700 previouslyPreviously paid.

(3)
Includes shares of Series A common stock that the underwriters have the option to purchase to cover over-allotments, if any.

(4)
The preferred stock purchase rights initially will trade together with the common stock. The value attributable to the preferred stock purchase rights, if any, is reflected in the offering price of the common stock.

(5)
Includes shares of our Series A common stock that are issuable upon conversion or exchange of the convertible perpetual preferred stock registered hereby or otherwise issuable pursuant to the terms thereof. The estimated number of shares of Series A common stock to be issued upon conversion or exchange of the convertible perpetual preferred stock is based on an assumed initial conversion price of $24.00 per sharesshare of Series A common stock and assumes conversion or exchange of all of the shares of convertible perpetual preferred stock into shares of our Series A common stock. In addition to the shares set forth in the table, pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act the number of shares registered includes an indeterminate number of shares of our Series A common stock issuable upon conversion or exchange of the convertible perpetual preferred stock, as this amount may be adjusted as a result of stock splits, stock dividends and antidilution provisions. We will not receive additional consideration in connection with the conversion into or exchange for our Series A common stock by the holders of the convertible perpetual preferred stock, and therefore, no registration fee is required pursuant to Rule 457(i) for such shares of our Series A common stock registered hereby.

        The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.





EXPLANATORY NOTE

        This Registration Statement contains two forms of prospectus: one to be used in connection with an initial public offering of 50,000,000 shares of our Series A common stock (the "Common Stock Prospectus") and one to be used in connection with an initial public offering of $200 million aggregate liquidation preference of our convertible perpetual preferred stock (the "Preferred Stock Prospectus"). The Common Stock Prospectus and the Preferred Stock Prospectus will be identical in all respects except for the alternate pages for the Preferred Stock Prospectus included herein which are labeled "Alternate Page for Preferred Stock Prospectus."


The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell securities and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

PROSPECTUS (Subject to Completion)

Issued January ,5, 2005

50,000,000 Shares

GRAPHIC

Celanese Corporation

SERIES A COMMON STOCK


        Celanese Corporation is offering 50,000,000 shares of its Series A common stock. This offering is being made concurrently with the offering of our convertible perpetual preferred stock pursuant to a separate prospectus. This offering is not contingent on the completion of the convertible perpetual preferred stock offering. We intend to use approximately $207 million of the net proceeds from the sale of the shares being sold by us in this offering to redeem a portion of the senior discount notes of one of our subsidiaries. We intend to use approximately $566 million of the net proceeds from the sale of the shares being sold by us in this offering to redeem a portion of the senior subordinated notes of another of our subsidiaries. We intend to use borrowings under the new senior credit facilities that our subsidiaries expect to enter into prior to the consummation of this offering, together with any remaining proceeds from the sale of the shares being sold by us in this offering and from the sale of our convertible perpetual preferred stock, to repay all amounts outstanding under the existing senior credit facilities and the floating rate term loan of our subsidiaries and to pay an approximately $952 million special dividend to holders of our Series B common stock. This is our initial public offering and no public market currently exists for our shares. We anticipate that the initial public offering price will be between $19.00 and $21.00 per share.


        We intend to list the Series A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "CE."


        Investing in the Series A common stock involves risks. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 16.


PRICE$          A SHARE


 
 Price to
Public

 Underwriting
Discounts and
Commissions

 Proceeds to
Celanese
Corporation

Per Share $  $  $ 
Total $  $  $ 

        We have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an additional 7,500,000 shares of Series A common stock to cover over-allotments. We intend to use the net proceeds from any shares sold pursuant to the underwriters' over-allotment option to pay an additional dividend to holders of our Series B common stock.

        The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities, or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

        Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Lehman Brothers Inc. expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on            , 2005.


Morgan Stanley Lehman Brothers
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Banc of America Securities LLC
UBS Investment Bank

Deutsche Bank Securities

 

Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.

 

Credit Suisse First Boston

Friedman Billings Ramsey




Stephens Inc.

                    , 2005

 

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 Page

Basis of Presentation

 

ii

Market and Industry Data and Forecasts

 

iv

Prospectus Summary

 

1

Risk Factors

 

16

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

3435

Special Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

3637

The Transactions

 

3839

The Recent Restructuring

 

4546

Use of Proceeds

 

4950

Dividend Policy

 

5253

Capitalization

 

5455

Dilution

 

5657

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

 

5859

Selected Historical Financial Data

 

7172

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

7677


Industry Overview


 


135137

Business

 

140142

Management

 

173175

Principal Stockholders and Beneficial Owners

 

183185

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

 

185187

Description of Indebtedness

 

189191

Description of Capital Stock

 

198200

Description of Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock

 

207209

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

 

210212

Certain United States Federal Income and Estate Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders

 

212214

Underwriters

 

215217

Validity of the Shares

 

221223

Experts

 

221223

Where You Can Find Additional Information

 

221223

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-1

        You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. None of the Issuer nor its subsidiaries has authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. The prospectus may be used only for the purposes for which it has been published and no person has been authorized to give any information not contained in this prospectus. If you receive any other information, you should not rely on it. The Issuer is not making an offer of these securities in any state where the offer is not permitted.


        Until                        , 2005 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that buy, sell or trade our stock, whether or not participating in this offer, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

i



BASIS OF PRESENTATION

        In this prospectus, the term "the Issuer" refers to Celanese Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and not its subsidiaries and the terms "we," "our" and "us" refer to the Issuer and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The term "BCP Crystal" refers to our subsidiary BCP Crystal US Holdings Corp., and not its subsidiaries. The term "Purchaser" refers to our subsidiary, Celanese Europe Holding GmbH & Co. KG, formerly known as BCP Crystal Acquisition GmbH & Co. KG, a German limited partnership (Kommanditgesellschaft, KG), and not its subsidiaries, except where otherwise indicated. The term "Original Stockholders" refers, collectively, to Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 1, Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 2, Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 3 and BA Capital Investors Sidecar Fund, L.P. Unless we specifically state otherwise, references to "pro forma" give effect, in the manner described under "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information" and the notes thereto, to (i) the Transactions and the Recent Restructuring (each as defined in this prospectus) and (ii) the offering of our Series A common stock, the offering of our convertible perpetual preferred stock (the "preferred stock"), the entering into of the new senior credit facilities and the use of proceeds therefrom (collectively, the "Concurrent Financings").

        As of the date of this prospectus, we have one class of common stock, all of which is held by the Original Stockholders. Shortly before completion of this offering, we intend to complete a recapitalization in which we will create two series of common stock. The recapitalization, which may occur through a merger between us and a newly created wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, a share exchange by the Original Stockholders or by other means, will result in the creation of Series A common stock and Series B common stock. The shares sold in the initial public offering of our common stock will be Series A common stock. The Original Stockholders will exchange the shares of common stock that they currently hold for an equivalent number of shares of Series B common stock, which will enable them to receive dividends (the "special Series B common stock dividends") as described under "Description of Capital Stock—Authorized Capitalization—Common Stock—Dividend Rights." The amounts of the cash special Series B common stock dividends in this prospectus are based on an assumed initial public offering price of $20.00 per share of Series A common stock. Except for the special Series B common stock dividends which we expect to pay to the holders of outstanding shares of Series B common stock on or afterin April 7, 2005 (or earlier in the case of the portion of the dividend payable in shares of Series A common stock), the convertibility of Series B common stock into Series A common stock and the right of the Series B common stock to consent to any changes to our governing documents that would adversely affect the Series B common stock, shares of Series A common stock and shares of Series B common stock will be identical, including with respect to voting rights. The Series B common stock will automatically convert into Series A common stock upon payment of the special Series B common stock dividends and may also be converted into Series A common stock at any time at the option of the holder. As used in this prospectus, the term "common stock," when used in reference to our capital structure before completion of this offering, means our existing single class of common stock, and when used in reference to our capital structure following completion of this offering, means, collectively, the Series A common stock and the Series B common stock, unless otherwise specified.

        Pursuant to a voluntary tender offer commenced in February 2004, the Purchaser, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Issuer, in April 2004 acquired approximately 84% of the ordinary shares of Celanese AG (the "Celanese Shares") outstanding. All references in this prospectus to the outstanding ordinary shares of Celanese AG exclude treasury shares. As of September 30, 2004, the Issuer's indirect ownership of approximately 84% of the outstanding Celanese Shares would equate to approximately 76% of the issued Celanese Shares (including treasury shares). Pursuant to a mandatory offer commenced in September 2004 and continuing as of the date of this prospectus, the Purchaser acquired additional Celanese Shares. As a result of these acquisitions, partially offset by the issuance of additional shares of Celanese AG as a result of the exercise of options issued under the Celanese AG

ii



stock option plan, as of the date of this prospectus, we own approximately 84% of the outstanding Celanese Shares.

ii


        The Issuer is a recently-formed company which does not have, apart from the financing of the Transactions (as defined in this prospectus), any independent external operations other than through the indirect ownership of the Celanese businesses. The Issuer's unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ended September 30, 2004 and the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Celanese AG for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003 (together, the "Interim Consolidated Financial Statements"), are included elsewhere in this prospectus. For accounting purposes, the Issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to as the "Successor." See notes 2 and 4 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the basis of presentation and accounting policies of the Successor.

        Celanese AG is incorporated as a stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft, AG) organized under the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany. As used in this prospectus, the term "Celanese" refers to Celanese AG and Celanese Americas Corporation, their consolidated subsidiaries, their non-consolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures and other investments, except that with respect to shareholder and similar matters where the context indicates, "Celanese" refers to Celanese AG. For accounting purposes, "Celanese" or "Predecessor" refers to Celanese AG and its majority owned subsidiaries over which Celanese AG exercises control, as well as special purpose entities which are variable interest entities where Celanese is deemed the primary beneficiary. See note 3 to the consolidated financial statements of Celanese as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 contained in this prospectus (the "Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements").

        The Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements included in this prospectus were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP") for all periods presented. The Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, for the periods indicated, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the businesses transferred to Celanese from Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, also referred to as "Hoechst" in this prospectus, in a demerger that became effective on October 22, 1999, adjusted for acquisitions and divestitures. The Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial information included in this prospectus, unless otherwise specified, have been presented to separately show the effects of discontinued operations.

        Celanese AG is a foreign private issuer and previously filed its consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003 on Form 20-F. In accordance with German law, the reporting currency of the Celanese AG consolidated financial statements is the euro. As a result of the Purchaser's acquisition of voting control of Celanese, the financial statements of Celanese contained in this prospectus are reported in U.S. dollars to be consistent with our reporting requirements. For Celanese AG's reporting requirements, the euro continues to be the reporting currency.

        In the preparation of other information included in this prospectus, euro amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars at the applicable historical rate in effect on the date of the relevant event/period. For purposes of pro forma and prospective information, euro amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars using the rate in effect on September 30, 2004. Our inclusion of this information is not meant to suggest that the euro amounts actually represent such dollar amounts or that such amounts could have been converted into U.S. dollars at any particular rate, if at all.

iii



MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA AND FORECASTS

        This prospectus includes industry data and forecasts that the Issuer has prepared based, in part, upon industry data and forecasts obtained from industry publications and surveys and internal company surveys. Third-party industry publications and surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. In this prospectus, the terms "SRI Handbook," "CMAI Methanol Analysis," "Nexant Chem Study 2003," "Nexant Chem Study 2002" and "Tecnon Orbichem Survey" refer to the SRIInternational Chemical Economics Handbook,CMAI 2002-2003 World Methanol Analysis, Nexant Chem SystemsSeptember 2003 PERP Acetic Acid Study, Nexant Chem SystemsFebruary 2002 Vinyl Acetate Study and Tecnon OrbichemAcetic Acid and Vinyl Acetate World Survey September 2003 report, respectively. The statements regarding Celanese's market position in this prospectus are based on information derived from the SRI Handbook, CMAI Methanol Analysis, Tecnon Orbichem Survey, Nexant Chem Study 2002 and Nexant Chem Study 2003.


        AO Plus™, BuyTiconaDirect™, CelActiv™, Celanex®, Celcon®, Celstran®, Celvolit®, Compel®, GUR®, Hoecat®, Hostaform®, Impet®, Impet-HI®, Mowilith®, Nutrinova® DHA, Riteflex®, Sunett®, Topas®, Vandar®, VAntage™, Vectra®, Vectran® and certain other products and services named in this prospectus are registered trademarks and service marks of Celanese. Fortron® is a registered trademark of Fortron Industries, a joint venture of Celanese.

iv



PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

        This summary highlights selected information in this prospectus, but it may not contain all of the information that you should consider before deciding to invest in our stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the "Risk Factors" section and the financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.

        See "Market and Industry Data and Forecasts" on page iii for the sources of our leadership statements below.


CELANESE CORPORATION

        We are an integrated global producer of value-added industrial chemicals and have #1 or #2 market positions worldwide in products comprising the majority of our sales. We are also the world's largest producer of acetyl products, including acetic acid, vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) and polyacetals (POM) and a leading global producer of high-performance engineered polymers used in consumer and industrial products and designed to meet highly technical customer requirements. Our operations are located in North America, Europe and Asia, including substantial joint ventures in China. We believe we are one of the lowest-cost producers of key building block chemicals in the acetyls chain, such as acetic acid and VAM, due to our economies of scale, operating efficiencies and proprietary production technologies.

        We have a large and diverse global customer base consisting principally of major companies in a broad array of industries. In 2003, 39% of our net sales were to customers located in North America, 40% to customers in Europe and 21% to customers in Asia, Australia and the rest of the world.

Segment Overview

        We operate through four business segments: Chemical Products, Technical Polymers Ticona, Acetate Products and Performance Products. The table below illustrates each segment's net sales to external customers for the year ended December 31, 2003, as well as each segment's major products and end use markets.

 
 Chemical Products
 Technical
Polymers Ticona

 Acetate Products(2)
 Performance Products

2003 Net Sales(1)

 

$2,968 million

 

$762 million

 

$655 million

 

$169 million

Major Products

 










 

Acetic acid
Vinyl acetate monomer
(VAM)
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH)
Emulsions
Acetic anhydride
Acetate esters
Carboxylic acids
Methanol

 










 

 

Polyacetal (POM)
UHMW-PE (GUR)
Liquid crystal polymers
(Vectra)
Polyphenylene sulfide
Fortron)



 

 










 

 

Acetate tow
Acetate filament







 

 










 

 

Sunett sweetener
Sorbates







 

Major End-Use
Markets


 

 






 

Paints
Coatings
Adhesives
Lubricants
Detergents

 






 

Fuel system
components
Conveyor belts
Electronics
Seat belt mechanisms

 





 

 

Filter products
Textiles


 

 





 

 

Beverages
Confections
Baked goods
Dairy products
 

(1)
2003 net sales of $4,603 million also include $49 million in net sales from Other Activities. 2003 net sales of Chemical Products excludes $97 million in inter-segment sales.

(2)
In October 2004, we announced our plans to discontinue filament production by mid 2005 and to consolidate our flake and tow production at three sites instead of the current five.

        Our Chemical Products segment produces and supplies acetyl products, including acetic acid, acetate esters, vinyl acetate monomer, polyvinyl alcohol, and emulsions. We are a leading global producer of acetic acid, the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer and the largest North American producer of methanol, the major raw material used for the production of acetic acid. We are also the largest polyvinyl alcohol producer in North America.

        Our Technical Polymers Ticona segment develops, produces and supplies a broad portfolio of high performance technical polymers for use in automotive and electronics products and in other consumer and industrial applications, often replacing metal or glass. Together with our 45%-owned joint venture Polyplastics Co.Ltd ("Polyplastics"), our 50%-owned joint venture Korea Engineering Plastics Company Ltd., and Fortron Industries, our 50-50 joint venture with Kureha Chemicals Industry of Japan, we are a leading participant in the global technical polymers business.

        Our Acetate Products segment primarily produces and supplies acetate tow, which is used in the production of filter products and acetate filament, which is used in the apparel and home furnishing industries. We are one of the world's leading producers of acetate tow and acetate filament, including production by our joint ventures in China. In October 2004, we announced plans to consolidate our acetate flake and tow manufacturing by early 2007 and to exit the acetate filament business by mid-2005. This restructuring is being implemented to increase efficiency, reduce over-capacities in certain manufacturing areas and to focus on products and markets that provide long-term value.

        The Performance Products segment operates under the trade name of Nutrinova and produces and sells a high intensity sweetener and food protection ingredients, such as sorbates, for the food, beverage and pharmaceuticals industries.

Competitive Strengths

        We have benefited from a number of competitive strengths, including the following:


Business Strategies

        We are focused on increasing operating cash flows, profitability, return on investment and shareholder value, which we believe can be achieved through the following business strategies:



THE TRANSACTIONS

        As used in this prospectus, the term "Transactions" means, collectively, the Tender Offer, the Original Financing, the Refinancing and the Senior Discount Notes Offering described under "The Transactions" elsewhere in this prospectus.

        Pursuant to the Tender Offer, in April 2004 the Purchaser, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Issuer, acquired, at a price of €32.50 per share, a total of 41,588,227 Celanese Shares, representing approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004. Pursuant to a mandatory offer commenced in September 2004 and continuing as of the date of this prospectus, the Purchaser acquired additional Celanese Shares. As a result of these acquisitions, partially offset by the issuance of additional shares of Celanese AG as a result of the exercise of options issued under the Celanese AG stock option plan, as of the date of this prospectus, we own approximately 84% of the outstanding Celanese Shares. The Purchaser may from time to time purchase or be required to purchase any or all of the outstanding Celanese Shares not owned by it in market transactions or otherwise. Examples of instances in which the Purchaser may be required to purchase additional Celanese shares include the ongoing mandatory offer relating to the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement entered into by the Purchaser and Celanese AG, or additional mandatory offers required by actions that the Purchaser or its affiliates may take in the future, such as a possible delisting of the Celanese Shares from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, a possible squeeze-out of the minority shareholders of Celanese AG or a possible conversion of Celanese AG into a different legal form. The Purchaser's decision to pursue subsequent voluntary purchases will depend on, among other factors, the then-prevailing market prices and any negotiated terms with minority shareholders. See "The Transactions—Post-Tender Offer Events."


RECENT RESTRUCTURING

        We recently completed an internal restructuring of certain of our operations. See "The Recent Restructuring."


RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

        In October 2004, we announced plans to implement a strategic restructuring of our acetate business to increase the efficiency, reduce overcapacity in certain areas and to focus on products and markets that provide long-term value. As part of this restructuring, we plan to discontinue acetate filament production by mid-2005 and to consolidate our acetate flake and tow operations at three locations, instead of five. The restructuring resulted in $50 million of asset impairment charges recorded as a special charge and $12 million in charges to depreciation for related asset retirement obligations for the six months ended September 30, 2004. In addition, we expect to record severance liabilities of approximately $40 million in the fourth quarter of 2004, with a corresponding increase in goodwill. Sales of acetate filament were $118 million in 2003.

        On October 27, 2004 we agreed to acquire Acetex Corporation, a Canadian corporation, for approximately $261 million and the assumption by us of debt owed by Acetex, valued at approximately $231 million. Acetex has two primary businesses: the Acetyls Business and the Specialty Polymers and Films Business. The Acetyls business produces acetic acid, polyvinyl alcohol and vinyl acetate monomer. The Specialty Polymers and Films Business produces specialty polymers (used in the manufacture of a variety of plastics products, including packaging and laminating products, auto parts, adhesives and medical products) as well as products for the agricultural, horticultural and construction industries. Acetex will be operated as part of our chemicals business. Closing of the acquisition is conditioned upon Acetex shareholder approval, regulatory approvals and other customary conditions. We expect to finance this acquisition through borrowings under the new senior credit facilities.

        On November 23, 2004, we agreed to acquire Vinamul Polymers, the North American and European emulsion polymer business of National Starch and Chemical Company, for $208 million.



National Starch and Chemical Company is a subsidiary of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC. The Vinamul Polymers product line includes vinyl acetate-ethylene copolymers, vinyl acetate homopolymers and copolymers, and acrylic and vinyl acrylic emulsions. Vinamul Polymers operates manufacturing facilities in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and The Netherlands. As part of the agreement, National Starch and Chemical Company will continue to supply Vinamul Polymers with starch, dextrin and other specialty ingredients following the acquisition. We will supply the Vinamul Polymers business with vinyl acetate monomer and polyvinyl alcohols. We expect to finance this acquisition through borrowings under the new senior credit facilities.

        In December 2004, we approved a plan to dispose of the Cyclo-olefin Copolymer ("COC") business included within the Technical Polymers Ticona segment and our interest in Pemeas GmbH, the fuel cell joint venture included in Other Activities. As a result of this decision, we expect to record an impairment loss in the three months ended December 31, 2004, the amount of which has not yet been determined. The operating loss for COC was $(35) million for the year ended December 31, 2003, $(9) million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and $(18) million for the six months ended September 30, 2004. The operating loss for the fuel cell business was $(12) million for the year ended December 31, 2003, $(3) million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and $(4) million for the six months ended September 30, 2004.


        Our principal executive offices are located at 1601 West LBJ Freeway, Dallas, TX 75234-6034 and our main telephone number is +1-972-443-4000.



THE OFFERING

Common stock offered 50,000,000 shares of Series A common stock
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering 158,675,271 shares, consisting of (1) 58,937,909 shares of Series A common stock (including 7,500,000 shares that will be distributed to holders of our Series B common stock as a dividend if the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option and 1,437,909 shares to be issued to management); and (2) 99,737,362 shares of Series B common stock
Over-allotment option 7,500,000 shares of Series A common stock
Common stock Upon completion of this offering, we will have two series of common stock: Series A and Series B. Except for (i) the special Series B common stock dividends which we expect to pay to the holders of outstanding shares of Series B common stock on or afterin April 7, 2005 (or earlier in the case of the portion of the dividend payable in shares of Series A common stock), (ii) the convertibility of Series B common stock into Series A common stock and (iii) the right of the Series B common stock to consent to any changes to our governing documents that would adversely affect the Series B common stock, shares of Series A common stock and shares of Series B common stock will be identical, including with respect to voting rights. The Series B common stock will automatically convert into Series A common stock upon payment of the special Series B common stock dividends, and may also be converted into Series A common stock at any time at the option of the holder.
Use of proceeds We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses, will be approximately $949 million. This offering is being made concurrently with the offering of our preferred stock pursuant to a separate prospectus. We estimate that the net proceeds from the offering of our preferred stock, after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses, will be approximately $194 million. We intend to use (1) approximately $207 million of the net proceeds from this offering to redeem a portion of the senior discount notes and approximately $566 million to redeem a portion of the senior subordinated notes of our subsidiaries and (2) borrowings under the new senior credit facilities that our subsidiaries expect to enter into prior to the consummation of this offering, together with any remaining net proceeds from this offering and from the offering of our preferred stock, to repay the existing senior credit facilities and the floating rate term loan of our subsidiaries and to pay a $952 million dividend to holders of our Series B common stock. Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 1, Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 2, Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 3 and BA Capital Investors Sidecar Fund, L.P. (collectively, the "Original Stockholders"), will be the only holders of our Series B common stock immediately prior to the consummation of this offering. See "Use of Proceeds," "Description of Capital Stock—Authorized Capitalization—Common Stock," "Description of Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock" and "Description of Indebtedness."
   

Dividend Policy Upon the completion of this offering, our board of directors currently intends to adopt a policy of declaring, subject to legally available funds, a quarterly cash dividend on each share of our Series A common stock of 0.1875%at an annual rate initially equal to approximately 0.75% of the average of the closing sale prices of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the last ten trading days of the prior quarter, not to exceed $0.05price per share of Series A common stock per quarterin this offering unless our board of directors in its sole discretion determines otherwise, commencing with the second quarter of 2005. However, there is no assurance that sufficient cash will be available to pay such dividend. In addition, we expect to declare and pay (i) the $952 million dividend described under "—Use of Proceeds" above, (ii) a dividend with any proceeds from the underwriters' over-allotment option, (iii) a stock dividend if the underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised in full, in each case, payable to holders of our Series B common stock, and (iv) the scheduled quarterly dividends on our preferred stock. The Original Stockholders will be the only holders of our Series B common stock immediately prior to the consummation of this offering. Any change in the aggregate amount of net proceeds raised in the common stock and preferred stock offerings will either increase or decrease the cash dividend to be paid to the holders of our Series B common stock, as the case may be, but will not affect the amount of debt to be redeemed or repaid. For so long as the preferred stock remains outstanding, (1) we will not declare, pay or set apart funds for the payment of any dividend or other distribution with respect to any junior stock or parity stock and (2) neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, will, subject to certain exceptions, redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration junior stock or parity stock through a sinking fund or otherwise, in each case unless we have paid or set apart funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of preferred stock and any parity stock for all preceding dividend periods and except for the special Series B common stock dividends. See "Dividend Policy," "Description of Capital Stock—Common Stock," "Description of Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock" and "Description of Indebtedness—New Senior Credit Facilities."
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol "CE"

        Unless we specifically state otherwise, all information in this prospectus:



RISK FACTORS

        An investment in our stock involves risks. You should carefully consider all the information in this prospectus prior to investing in our stock. In particular, we urge you to consider carefully the factors set forth under the heading "Risk Factors."



SUMMARY HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

        The balance sheet data shown below for 2002 and 2003, and the statements of operations and cash flow data for 2001, 2002 and 2003, all of which are set forth below, are derived from the audited Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and the notes thereto. The balance sheet data for 2001 are unaudited and have been derived from, and translated into U.S. dollars based on, Celanese's historical euro audited financial statements.

        The summary historical financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and the three months ended March 31, 2004 have been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Celanese, which have been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited consolidated financial statements of Celanese as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. The summary historical financial data as of and for the six months ended September 30, 2004 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, such unaudited financial data reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for those periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any future period. The unaudited consolidated financial information as of September 30, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2004, six months ended September 30, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003 is included elsewhere in this prospectus.

        The following summary unaudited pro forma financial data have been prepared to give pro forma effect to the Transactions, the Recent Restructuring and the Concurrent Financings, as if they had occurred on January 1, 2003, in the case of our unaudited pro forma statements of operations data, and on September 30, 2004, in the case of our unaudited pro forma balance sheet data. The pro forma financial data are for informational purposes only and should not be considered indicative of actual results that would have been achieved had the Transactions, the Recent Restructuring, and the Concurrent Financings actually been consummated on the dates indicated and do not purport to indicate balance sheet data or results of operations as of any future date or for any future period. You should read the following data in conjunction with "The Transactions," "The Recent Restructuring," "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

        As of September 30, 2004, the Purchaser, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Issuer, owned approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares then outstanding. The Issuer is a recently-formed company which, apart from the financing of the Transactions, does not have any independent external operations other than through the indirect ownership of Celanese's business. Accordingly, financial and other information of Celanese is presented in this prospectus. This prospectus presents the financial information relating to Celanese under the caption "Predecessor" and the information relating to us under the caption "Successor." See "The Transactions."


 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 
 
  
  
  
 Unaudited
 Unaudited
 
 
 Celanese
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Pro Forma(1)
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
  
 
 
 Nine Months
Ended September 30,
2003

 Three Months Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six Months Ended September 30,
2004

 Year Ended December 31, 2003
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions, except shares and per share data)

 
Statement of Operations Data:                      
Net sales $3,970 $3,836 $4,603 $3,448 $1,243 $2,494 $4,603 $3,737 
Cost of sales  (3,409) (3,171) (3,883) (2,881) (1,002) (2,063) (3,818) (2,979)
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (489) (446) (510) (384) (137) (278) (522) (414)
Research and development expenses  (74) (65) (89) (66) (23) (45) (88) (67)
Special charges(2):                         
 Insurance recoveries associated with plumbing cases  28    107  106    1  107  1 
 Sorbates antitrust matters      (95) (95)     (95)  
 Restructuring, impairment and other special charges, net  (444) 5  (17) (2) (28) (59) (17) (66)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  1  3  (4) (3)   (2) (4) (2)
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets    11  6  5  (1) 2  6  1 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating profit (loss)  (417) 173  118  128  52  50  172  211 
Equity in net earnings of affiliates  12  21  35  29  12  35  35  47 
Interest expense  (72) (55) (49) (36) (6) (228) (238) (184)
Interest and other income (expense), net(3)  58  45  99  85  22  8  99  30 
Income tax benefit (provision)  106  (61) (60) (68) (25) (58) (60) (104)
Minority interests            (2) (6) (17)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  (313) 123  143  138  55  (195)$2 $(17)
                    
 
 
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax  (52) 27  6  (7) 23  (1)      
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, net of income tax    18  (1) (1)          
  
 
 
 
 
 
       
Net earnings (loss) $(365)$168 $148 $130 $78 $(196)      
  
 
 
 
 
 
       
Earnings (loss) per Series A and Series B common share—basic and diluted(4):                         
 Continuing operations                $(1.96)$(0.03)$(0.11)
                 
 
 
 
 Discontinued operations                $(0.01)      
                 
       
 Net earnings (loss)                $(1.97)      
                 
       
Weighted average shares—basic and diluted(4):                         
  Series A                    106,537,909  106,537,909 
                    
 
 
  Series B                 99,737,362  99,737,362  99,737,362 
                 
 
 
 
  Combined                 99,737,362  206,275,271  206,275,271 
                 
 
 
 


Other Financial Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
EBITDA (unaudited)(5) $(42)$468 $502 $420 $153 $226 $550 $473 
Unusual items included in EBITDA (unaudited)(6)  440  16  113  32  37  117  113  133 
Other non-cash charges (income) included in EBITDA (unaudited)(7)  21  97  24  17  13  37  (4) 5 
Depreciation and amortization  326  247  294  213  72  150  294  222 
Capital expenditures  191  203  211  133  44  106  211  150 
Cash distributions from cost and equity method investments (unaudited)  69  139  83  54  30  44  83  74 
Dividends paid per share(8) $0.35   $0.48           

Statement of Cash Flows Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations:                         
Operating activities $462 $363 $401 $231 $(107)$109       
Investing activities  (105) (139) (275) (178) 96  (1,724)      
Financing activities  (337) (150) (108) (135) (43) 2,448       
Balance Sheet Data (at the end of the period) (2001 unaudited):                         
Trade working capital(9) $499 $599 $641    $715 $808    $808 
Total assets  6,232  6,417  6,814     6,613  7,066     6,865 
Total debt  775  644  637     587  3,100     3,217 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock(10)                   
Shareholders' equity (deficit)  1,954  2,096  2,582     2,622  (53)    (49)

(1)
We owned approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004 and the pro forma information presented above assumes that we do not acquire any additional Celanese Shares. Assuming the Purchaser were to pay the fair cash compensation offer price required by the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (the "Domination Agreement") of €41.92, plus interest, per share for all remaining Celanese Shares, earnings from continuing operations and EBITDA would each be higher by the amount of minority interest expense.

(2)
Special charges include impairment charges, provisions for restructuring, which include costs associated with employee termination benefits and plant and office closures, certain insurance recoveries and other expenses and income incurred outside the normal course of ongoing operations. See note 25 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 14 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3)
Interest and other income (expense), net, includes interest income, dividends from cost basis investments and other non-operating income (expense).

(4)
Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing earnings (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Earnings (loss) available to common stockholders is computed by deducting preferred stock dividends from net earnings (loss). Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing earnings (loss) available to common stockholders by the sum of weighted average common shares outstanding plus dilutive common shares for the period. As both series of our common stock will share equally in future undistributed earnings and losses, we report only combined earnings (loss) per share.

Earnings
Earnings (loss) per share is calculated as follows:

 
 Successor
 
 
 Six Months
Ended
September 30, 2004

 Pro forma Year
Ended
December 31, 2003

 Pro forma Nine
Months Ended
Sept 30, 2004

 
 
 (In millions, except per share amounts)

 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $(195)$2 $(17)
Less: Preferred dividends assuming a 4% dividend rate     (8) (6)
  
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations allocable to common stockholders  (195) (6) (23)

(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

(1

)

 


 

 


 
  
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss) allocable to common stockholders $(196)$(6)$(23)
  
 
 
 
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) from continuing operations per Series A and Series B common share(a) $(1.96)$(0.03)$(0.11)
  
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per Series A and Series B common share $(1.97)      
  
       
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding(b):          
 Series A     106,537,909  106,537,909 
     
 
 
 Series B  99,737,362  99,737,362  99,737,362 
  
 
 
 
 Combined  99,737,362  206,275,271  206,275,271 
 ��
 
 
 

Antidilutive shares(c):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Series A employee stock options     12,311,718  12,311,718 
     
 
 
 Preferred stock     8,333,333  8,333,333 
     
 
 


Shares outstanding 650,494
Stock split 153.325569
  
Series B common shares 99,737,362
  
Shares of Series A common stock issued pursuant to the offering of Series A common stock 50,000,000
Shares issued to certain executive officers, key employees and directors 1,437,909
Additional shares of Series A common stock in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment option 7,500,000
  
Series A common shares 58,937,909
Shares required to generate proceeds to replace capital being withdrawn (at an assumed offering price of $20.00) 47,600,000
  
Total Series A shares for earnings (loss) per share 106,537,909
  
Total Series A and Series B for earnings (loss) per share 206,275,271
  

(5)
EBITDA, a performance measure used by management, is defined as earnings (loss) from continuing operations, plus interest expense net of interest income, income taxes and depreciation and amortization, as shown in the table below. EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry. See "Special Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures." EBITDA is not a recognized term under GAAP and does not purport to be an alternative to net earnings as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.


Additionally, EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management's discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as interest payments, tax payments and debt service requirements. The amounts shown for EBITDA as presented in this prospectus differ from the amounts calculated under the definition of EBITDA used in our debt instruments. The definition of EBITDA used in our debt instruments is further adjusted for certain cash and non-cash charges and is used to determine compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities such as incurring additional debt and making certain payments. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity—Covenants."

        EBITDA is calculated and reconciled to net earnings (loss) as follows (unaudited):

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 
 
 Celanese
  
 Pro Forma
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2003

 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions)

 
Net earnings (loss) $(365)$168 $148 $130 $78 $(196)$2 $(17)
(Earnings) loss from discontinued operations  52  (27) (6) 7  (23) 1     
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles    (18) 1  1         
Interest expense  72  55  49  36  6  228  238  184 
Interest income  (21) (18) (44) (35) (5) (15) (44) (20)
Income tax (benefit) provision  (106) 61  60  68  25  58  60  104 
Depreciation and amortization  326  247  294  213  72  150  294  222 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EBITDA $(42)$468 $502 $420 $153 $226 $550 $473 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(6)
EBITDA, as defined above, was (increased) reduced by the following unusual items, each of which is further discussed below (unaudited):

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 
 Celanese
  
 Pro Forma
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2003

 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 (in millions)

Stock appreciation rights (income) expense(a) $10 $3 $59 $41 $ $1 $59 $1
Special charges(b)  416  (5) 5  (9) 28  58  5  65
Other restructuring charges(c)      26  8  10  13  26  23
Other (income) expense(d)  9  12  5  (17) (3) 31  5  28
Other unusual items(e)  5  6  18  9  2  14  18  16
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  $440 $16 $113 $32 $37 $117 $113 $133
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Represents the expense associated with stock appreciation rights that will not be incurred subsequent to the Transactions as it is expected that the plan will be replaced with other management equity arrangements that will not result in a cash cost to Celanese.

(b)
Represents provisions for restructuring, asset impairment, transaction costs and other unusual expenses and income incurred outside the ordinary course of business. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

(c)
Represents the portion of restructuring charges (consisting of employee termination benefits) that were not included in special charges.

(d)
Represents other non-operating (income) expense (other than dividends). See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

(e)
Represents primarily the expense associated with executive contract terminations, transaction costs not included in special charges, and rent expense paid to a variable interest entity that has been consolidated since the first quarter of 2004.

(7)
EBITDA, as defined above, was also (increased) reduced by the following other non-cash items, each of which is further discussed below (unaudited):

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 
 
 Celanese
  
 Pro Forma
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2003

 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions)

 
Amortization included in pension and OPEB expense(a) $10 $15 $28 $19 $8 $2 $ $ 
Adjustment to equity earnings(b)  11  79  (12) (8) 4  (15) (12) (11)
Other non-cash charges (income)(c)    3  8  6  1    2   
Purchase accounting for inventories(d)            49     
Minority interests(e)            1  6  16 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  $21 $97 $24 $17 $13 $37 $(4)$5 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Represents the portion of pension and other postretirement ("OPEB") expense resulting from amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses, prior service costs and transition obligations. In addition, we expect Celanese's future pension expense to be reduced as a result of the pre-funding of $463 million of pension contributions in connection with the Transactions. Assuming an annual long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.93%, Celanese's annual pension expense would decrease by an additional $37 million. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information."

(b)
Represents the adjustment to reflect earnings of investments accounted for under the equity method on a cash basis.

(c)
Relates primarily to non-cash expense associated with stock option plans.

(d)
Represents the one-time charge to cost of sales resulting from purchase accounting for inventories.

(e)
Represents minority interest expense relating to the approximately 16% of the Celanese Shares outstanding at September 30, 2004 that we did not own, net of actual dividends paid during the period. See note (7).

(8)
In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, Celanese AG declared and paid a dividend of €0.12 ($0.14) per share for the year ended December 31, 2003. See "The Transactions" for information on future dividends that may be required under German law to be paid to Celanese AG's minority shareholders.

(9)
Trade working capital is defined as trade accounts receivable from third parties and affiliates net of allowance for doubtful accounts, plus inventories, less trade accounts payable to third parties and affiliates. For the calculation of trade working capital, see note (8) to "Selected Historical Financial Data."

(10)
Our mandatorily redeemable preferred stock was repaid with the proceeds of the offering of the senior subordinated notes that occurred on July 1, 2004.


RISK FACTORS

        An investment in our stock involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information in this prospectus, before deciding to purchase any stock.

Risks Related to the Acquisition of Celanese

        If the Domination Agreement ceases to be operative, the Issuer's managerial control over Celanese AG is limited.

        As of the date of this prospectus, we own 100% of the outstanding shares of Celanese Americas Corporation ("CAC") and approximately 84% of the outstanding shares of Celanese AG. Our access to cash flows of, and our control of, Celanese AG is subject to the continuing effectiveness of the Domination Agreement. See "The Transactions—Post-Tender Offer Events—Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement."

        The Domination Agreement is subject to legal challenges instituted by dissenting shareholders. Minority shareholders have filed nine actions against Celanese AG in the Frankfurt District Court (Landgericht), seeking, among other things, to set aside the shareholder resolutions passed at the extraordinary general meeting held on July 30 and 31, 2004 based, among other things, on the alleged violation of procedural requirements and information rights of the shareholders, to declare the Domination Agreement and the change in the fiscal year void and to prohibit Celanese AG from performing its obligations under the Domination Agreement. Pursuant to German law, the time period for the filing of such challenges has expired. Further, two additional minority shareholders have joined the proceedings via third party intervention in support of the plaintiffs. The Purchaser has joined the proceedings via third party intervention in support of Celanese AG. In addition, a German court could revoke the registration of the Domination Agreement in the commercial register. On August 2, 2004, two minority shareholders instituted public register proceedings with the Königstein Local Court (Amtsgericht) and the Frankfurt District Court, both with a view to have the registration of the Domination Agreement in the Commercial Register deleted (Amtslöschungsverfahren). See "Business—Legal Proceedings."

        If the Domination Agreement ceases to be operative, the Purchaser's ability, and thus our ability to control the board of management decisions of Celanese AG, will be significantly limited by German law. As a result, we may not be able to ensure that our strategy for the operation of our business can be fully implemented. In addition, our access to the operating cash flow of Celanese AG in order to fund payment requirements on our indebtedness will be limited, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of our stock.

        If the Domination Agreement ceases to be operative, certain actions taken under the Domination Agreement might have to be reversed.

        If legal challenges of the Domination Agreement by dissenting shareholders of Celanese AG are successful, some or all actions taken under the Domination Agreement, including the Recent Restructuring, may be required to be reversed and the Purchaser may be required to compensate Celanese AG for damages caused by such actions. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and on the value of our stock.

        Minority shareholders may interfere with Celanese AG's future actions, which may prevent us from causing Celanese AG to take actions which may have beneficial effects for our shareholders.

        The Purchaser currently owns approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares. Shareholders unrelated to us hold the remainder of the outstanding Celanese Shares. German law provides certain rights to minority shareholders, which could have the effect of delaying, or interfering with, corporate actions (including those requiring shareholder approval), such as the potential application for revocation of



admission of the Celanese Shares to the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, the squeeze-out and the potential conversion of Celanese AG from its current legal form of a stock corporation into a limited partnership (Kommanditgesellschaft, KG) or a limited liability company (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, GmbH) in accordance with the provisions of the German Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz, UmwG). Minority shareholders may be able to delay or prevent the implementation of Celanese AG's corporate actions irrespective of the size of their shareholding. Any challenge by minority shareholders to the validity of a corporate action may be subject to judicial resolution that may substantially delay or hinder the implementation of such action. Such delays of, or interferences with, corporate actions as well as related litigation may limit our access to Celanese AG's cash flows and make it difficult or impossible for us to take or implement corporate actions which may be desirable in view of our operating or financial requirements, including actions which may have beneficial effects for our shareholders.

        Celanese AG's board of management may refuse to comply with instructions given by the Purchaser pursuant to the Domination Agreement, which may prevent us from causing Celanese AG to take actions which may have beneficial effects for our shareholders.

        Under the Domination Agreement, the Purchaser is entitled to give instructions directly to the board of management of Celanese AG, including, but not limited to, instructions that are disadvantageous to Celanese AG, as long as such disadvantageous instructions benefit the Purchaser or the companies affiliated with either the Purchaser or Celanese AG. Celanese AG's board of management is required to comply with any such instruction, unless, at the time when such instruction is given, (i) it is, in the opinion of the board of management of Celanese AG, obviously not in the interests of the Purchaser or the companies affiliated with either the Purchaser or Celanese AG, (ii) in the event of a disadvantageous instruction, the negative consequences to Celanese AG are disproportionate to the benefits to the Purchaser or the companies affiliated with either the Purchaser or Celanese AG, (iii) compliance with the instruction would violate legal or statutory restrictions, (iv) compliance with the instruction would endanger the existence of Celanese AG or (v) it is doubtful whether the Purchaser will be able to fully compensate Celanese AG, as required by the Domination Agreement, for its annual loss (Jahresfehlbetrag) incurred during the fiscal year in which such instruction is given. The board of management of Celanese AG remains ultimately responsible for making the executive decisions for Celanese AG and the Purchaser, despite the Domination Agreement, is not entitled to act on behalf of, and has no power to legally bind, Celanese AG. The Celanese AG board of management may delay the implementation of, or refuse to implement, any of the Purchaser's instructions despite its general obligation to follow such instructions (with the exceptions mentioned above). Such delays of, or interferences with, compliance with the Purchaser's instructions by the board of management of Celanese AG may make it difficult or impossible for the Purchaser to implement corporate actions which may be desirable in view of our operating or financial requirements, including actions which may have beneficial effects for our shareholders.

        The Purchaser will be required to ensure that Celanese AG pays a guaranteed fixed annual payment to the minority shareholders of Celanese AG, which may reduce the funds the Purchaser can otherwise make available to us.

        As long as the Purchaser does not own 100% of the outstanding Celanese Shares, the Domination Agreement requires, among other things, the Purchaser to ensure that Celanese AG makes a gross guaranteed fixed annual payment (Ausgleich) to minority shareholders of €3.27 per Celanese share less certain corporate taxes in lieu of any future dividend. Taking into account the circumstances and the tax rates at the time of the entering into of the Domination Agreement, the net guaranteed fixed annual payment is €2.89 per share for a full fiscal year. As of December 6, 2004, there were approximately 7.9 million Celanese Shares held by minority shareholders. The net guaranteed fixed annual payment may, depending on applicable corporate tax rates, in the future be higher, lower or the same as €2.89. The amount of this guaranteed fixed annual payment was calculated in accordance with applicable



German law. The amount of the payment is currently under review in special award proceedings (Spruchverfahren). See "Business—Legal Proceedings." Such guaranteed fixed annual payments will be required regardless of whether the actual distributable profits per share of Celanese AG are higher, equal to, or lower than the amount of the guaranteed fixed annual payment per share. The guaranteed fixed annual payment will be payable for so long as there are minority shareholders of Celanese AG and the Domination Agreement remains in place. No dividends for the period after effectiveness of the Domination Agreement, other than the guaranteed fixed annual payment effectively paid by the Purchaser, are expected to be paid by Celanese AG. These requirements may reduce the funds the Purchaser can make available to the Issuer and its subsidiaries and, accordingly, diminish our ability to make payments, on our respective indebtedness. See "The Transactions—Post-Tender Offer Events—Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement."

        The amounts of the fair cash compensation and of the guaranteed fixed annual payment offered under the Domination Agreement may be increased, which may further reduce the funds the Purchaser can otherwise make available to us.

        As of the date of this prospectus, several minority shareholders of Celanese AG have initiated special award proceedings (Spruchverfahren) seeking the court's review of the amounts of the fair cash compensation (Abfindung) and of the guaranteed fixed annual payment (Ausgleich) offered under the Domination Agreement. So far, pleadings by several minority shareholders have been served on the Purchaser. As a result of these proceedings, the amounts of the fair cash compensation (Abfindung) and of the guaranteed fixed annual payment (Ausgleich) could be increased by the court. Any such increase may be substantial. All minority shareholders including those who have already received the fair cash compensation would be entitled to claim the respective higher amounts. This may reduce the funds the Purchaser can make available to the Issuer and its subsidiaries and, accordingly, diminish our ability to make payments on our indebtedness. See "Business—Legal Proceedings."

        The Purchaser may be required to compensate Celanese AG for annual losses, which may reduce the funds the Purchaser can otherwise make available to the Issuer.

        Under the Domination Agreement, the Purchaser is required, among other things, to compensate Celanese AG for any annual loss incurred, determined in accordance with German accounting requirements, by Celanese AG at the end of the fiscal year in which the loss was incurred. This obligation to compensate Celanese AG for annual losses will apply during the entire term of the Domination Agreement. If Celanese AG incurs losses during any period of the operative term of the Domination Agreement and if such losses lead to an annual loss of Celanese AG at the end of any given fiscal year during the term of the Domination Agreement, the Purchaser will be obligated to make a corresponding cash payment to Celanese AG to the extent that the respective annual loss is not fully compensated for by the dissolution of profit reserves (Gewinnrücklagen) accrued at the level of Celanese AG during the term of the Domination Agreement. The Purchaser may be able to reduce or avoid cash payments to Celanese AG by off-setting against such loss compensation claims by Celanese AG any valuable counterclaims against Celanese AG that the Purchaser may have. If the Purchaser was obligated to make cash payments to Celanese AG to cover an annual loss, we may not have sufficient funds to make payments on our indebtedness when due and, unless the Purchaser is able to obtain funds from a source other than annual profits of Celanese AG, the Purchaser may not be able to satisfy its obligation to fund such shortfall. See "The Transactions—Post-Tender Offer Events—Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement."

        Two of our subsidiaries have agreed to guarantee the Purchaser's obligation under the Domination Agreement, which may diminish our ability to make payments on our indebtedness.

        Our subsidiaries, BCP Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A. and BCP Crystal, have each agreed to provide the Purchaser with financing to strengthen the Purchaser's ability to fulfill its obligations under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement and to ensure that the Purchaser will perform all of



its obligations under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement when such obligations become due, including, without limitation, the obligations to make a guaranteed fixed annual payment to the outstanding minority shareholders, to offer to acquire all outstanding Celanese Shares from the minority shareholders in return for payment of fair cash consideration and to compensate Celanese AG for any annual loss incurred by Celanese AG during the term of the Domination Agreement. If BCP Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A. and/or BCP Crystal are obligated to make payments under such guarantees or other security to the Purchaser and/or the minority shareholders, we may not have sufficient funds for payments on our indebtedness when due.

        Even if the minority shareholders' challenges to the Domination Agreement are unsuccessful and the Domination Agreement continues to be operative, we may not be able to receive distributions from Celanese AG sufficient to pay our obligations.

        Even if the minority shareholders' challenges to the Domination Agreement are unsuccessful and the Domination Agreement continues to be operative, we are limited in the amount of distributions we may receive in any year from Celanese AG. Under German law, the amount of distributions to the Purchaser will be determined based on the amount of unappropriated earnings generated during the term of the Domination Agreement as shown in the unconsolidated annual financial statements of Celanese AG, prepared in accordance with German accounting principles and as adopted and approved by resolutions of the Celanese AG board of management and supervisory board, which financial statements may be different from Celanese's consolidated financial statements under U.S. GAAP. Our share of these earnings, if any, may not be in amounts and at times sufficient to allow us to pay our indebtedness as it becomes due, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of the stock.

        We must rely on payments from our subsidiaries to fund payments on our preferred stock and certain of our subsidiaries must rely on payments from their own subsidiaries to fund payments on their indebtedness. Such funds may not be available in certain circumstances.

        We must rely on payments from our subsidiaries to fund dividend, redemption and other payments on our preferred stock. In addition, our subsidiaries, BCP Crystal and Crystal US Holdings 3 L.L.C. ("Crystal LLC"), are holding companies and all of their operations are conducted through their subsidiaries. Therefore, they depend on the cash flow of their subsidiaries, including Celanese, to meet their obligations, including obligations of approximately $3.2 billion (after giving effect to the Transactions, the Recent Restructuring and the Concurrent Financings) of our indebtedness. If the Domination Agreement ceases to be operative, such subsidiaries may be unable to meet their obligations under such indebtedness. Although the Domination Agreement became operative on October 1, 2004, it is subject to legal challenges instituted by dissenting shareholders. In August 2004, minority shareholders filed nine actions against Celanese AG in the Frankfurt District Court (Landgericht) seeking, among other things, to set aside the shareholder resolutions passed at the extraordinary general meeting held on July 30 and 31, 2004 based, among other things, on the alleged violation of procedural requirements and information rights of the shareholders, to declare the Domination Agreement and the change in the fiscal year void and to prohibit Celanese AG from performing its obligations under the Domination Agreement. Pursuant to German law, the time period for the filing of such challenges has expired. Further, two additional minority shareholders have joined the proceedings via third party intervention in support of the plaintiffs. The Purchaser has joined the proceedings via third party intervention to support Celanese AG. In addition, a German court could revoke the registration of the Domination Agreement in the commercial register. On August 2, 2004, two minority shareholders instituted public register proceedings with the Königstein Local Court (Amtsgericht) and the Frankfurt District Court, both with a view to have the registration of the Domination Agreement in the Commercial Register deleted (Amtslöschungsverfahren). See "Business—Legal Proceedings."



        The ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us, BCP Crystal and Crystal LLC by way of dividends, interest, return on investments, or other payments (including loans) or distributions is subject to various restrictions, including restrictions imposed by the senior credit facilities and indentures governing their indebtedness, and the terms of future debt may also limit or prohibit such payments. In addition, the ability of the subsidiaries to make such payments may be limited by relevant provisions of German and other applicable laws.

        Our internal controls over financial reporting may not be adequate and our independent auditors may not be able to certify as to their adequacy, which could have a significant and adverse effect on our business and reputation.

        We are evaluating our internal controls over financial reporting in order to allow management to report on, and our independent auditors to attest to, our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder, which we refer to as Section 404. We are currently performing the system and process evaluation and testing required (and any necessary remediation) in an effort to comply with management certification and auditor attestation requirements of Section 404. The management certification and auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 will initially apply to Celanese Corporation as of December 31, 2005 and Celanese AG as of September 30, 2005. In the course of our ongoing evaluation, we have identified areas of internal controls requiring improvement, and plan to design enhanced processes and controls to address these and any other issues that might be identified through this review. We expect to incur additional expenses and diversion of management's time.

        We cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or the impact of the same on our operations. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, our independent auditors may not be able to certify as to the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting and we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC. As a result, there could be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. In addition, we may be required to incur costs in improving our internal control system and the hiring of additional personnel. Any such action could negatively affect our results.

        We expect to incur expenses of an aggregate of approximately $10-15 million in the fourth quarter of 2004 and in 2005 in connection with our compliance with Section 404.

We identified significant deficiencies in our internal controls that could affect our ability to ensure timely and reliable financial reports.

        In addition to and separate from our evaluation of internal controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any areas requiring improvement that we identify as part of that process, we have identified a number of significant deficiencies in our internal controls.

        In 2004, we identified two significant deficiencies in internal controls in the computation of certain accounting adjustments. The first related to the qualifications of employees responsible for initially calculating the change from the LIFO (last-in, first-out) method of accounting for inventories to FIFO (first-in, first-out) and the second related to changes in certain employee contract terms that were not reported timely for actuarial purposes. Corrective actions taken by us included an internal audit review, the development of enhanced guidelines, the termination and reassignment of responsible persons and an elevation of the issues to the Supervisory Board of Celanese AG.

        We are in the process of implementing changes to strengthen our internal controls. In addition, while we have taken actions to address these deficiencies, additional measures may be necessary and these measures along with other measures we expect to take to improve our internal controls may not be sufficient to address the issues identified by us or ensure that our internal controls are sufficient. If we are unable to correct deficiencies in internal controls in a timely manner, our ability to record,



process, summarize and report financial information will be adversely affected. This failure could



materially and adversely impact our business, our financial condition and the market value of our securities.

We expect to record significant fourth quarter charges and may have changes related to purchase accounting that could adversely affect our fourth quarter 2004 results.

        Although we have not completed the financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2004, we expect to incur certain significant charges in the fourth quarter in addition to those that are more fully described under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," including (all figures are based on preliminary estimates):


        Our results in the fourth quarter of 2004 could also be affected by other adjustments we may record that would impact our goodwill as well as our current and deferred provision for taxes. In particular,

        We are in the process of obtaining our final valuation reports related to our benefit plans, which may result in an adjustment to our additional minimum liability, a component of other comprehensive income and shareholders' equity, the amount of which is not yet determinable.

        The foregoing is not intended to be a complete list of the charges and other items that could have an effect on our results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2004. We may identify additional adjustments in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2004. These additional adjustments may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

        Our high level of indebtedness could diminish our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or the chemicals industry and prevent us from meeting obligations under our indebtedness.



        We are highly leveraged. On a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2004 after giving effect to the Transactions, the Recent Restructuring and the Concurrent Financings, our total debt would have been approximately $3.2 billion. See "Capitalization" for additional information.

        Our substantial debt could have important consequences for you, including:

        Despite our current high leverage, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks of our high leverage.

        We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of our existing debt do not fully prohibit us from doing so. The revolving credit facilities provide commitments of up to $608 million. As of December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facilities and availability of $402 million (taking into account letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facilities). In addition, upon the occurrence of certain events, we may request an increase to the existing term loan facility in an amount not to exceed $175 million in the aggregate, subject to receipt of commitments by existing term loan lenders or other financial institutions reasonably acceptable to the administrative agent. We also expect to incur an additional $442 million of indebtedness under our new senior credit facilities to finance the acquisitions of Acetex and Vinamul.Vinamul Polymers. See "Summary—Recent Developments." If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

        We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness, and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.

        Our ability to satisfy our cash needs depends on cash on hand, receipt of additional capital, including possible additional borrowings, and receipt of cash from our subsidiaries by way of distributions, advances or cash payments. On a pro forma basis at September 30, 2004, giving pro forma effect to the Concurrent Financings, we had approximately $3.2 billion of total indebtedness. Debt service requirements consist of principal repayments aggregating $260 million in the next five



years and $3,176 million thereafter (including $221 million of accreted value on the senior discount notes) and annual cash interest payments of approximately $185 million in each of the next five years. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations."

        Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our debt obligations depends on the financial condition and operating performance of our subsidiaries, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our



control. We may not be able to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness.

        If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets (including the Celanese Shares), seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. The senior credit facilities and the indentures governing our indebtedness restrict our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from the disposition. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain the proceeds which we could realize from them and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.

        Restrictive covenants in our debt instruments may limit our ability to engage in certain transactions and may diminish our ability to make payments on our indebtedness.

        The senior credit facilities, the floating rate term loan and the indentures governing our indebtedness contain various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions. These covenants limit the ability of Crystal LLC, BCP Crystal and their restricted subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, pay dividends on or make other distributions on or repurchase their capital stock or make other restricted payments, make investments, and sell certain assets.

        In addition, the senior credit facilities contain covenants that require Celanese Holdings LLC ("Celanese Holdings") to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Celanese Holdings' ability to meet those financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond its control, and it may not be able to meet those tests at all. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the senior credit facilities. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the senior credit facilities, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under the senior credit facilities to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If Celanese Holdings were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders under the senior credit facilities could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. Celanese Holdings has pledged a significant portion of its assets as collateral under the senior credit facilities. If the lenders under the senior credit facilities accelerate the repayment of borrowings, Celanese Holdings may not have sufficient assets to repay the senior credit facilities and its other indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of our stock.

        The terms of the senior credit facilities prohibit BCP Crystal and its subsidiaries from paying dividends or otherwise transferring their assets to us.

        Our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries and our ability to pay dividends is dependent on the earnings and the distribution of funds from our subsidiaries. However, the terms of the senior credit facilities prohibit BCP Crystal and its subsidiaries from paying dividends or otherwise transferring their assets to us. Accordingly, under the terms of the senior credit facilities, BCP Crystal and its subsidiaries may not make dividends to us to enable us to pay dividends on our stock.


Risks Related to Our Business

        We are an international company and are exposed to general economic, political and regulatory conditions and risks in the countries in which we have significant operations.

        We operate in the global market and have customers in many countries. We have major facilities located in North America, Europe and Asia, including facilities in Germany, China, Japan, Korea and Saudi Arabia operated through joint ventures. Our principal customers are similarly global in scope, and the prices of our most significant products are typically world market prices. Consequently, our business and financial results are affected directly and indirectly by world economic, political and regulatory conditions.

        Conditions such as the uncertainties associated with war, terrorist activities, epidemics, pandemics or political instability in any of the countries in which we operate could affect us by causing delays or losses in the supply or delivery of raw materials and products as well as increased security costs, insurance premiums and other expenses. These conditions could also result in or lengthen economic recession in the United States, Europe, Asia or elsewhere. Moreover, changes in laws or regulations, such as unexpected changes in regulatory requirements (including import or export licensing requirements), or changes in the reporting requirements of United States, German or European Union governmental agencies, could increase the cost of doing business in these regions. Any of these conditions may have an effect on our business and financial results as a whole and may result in volatile current and future prices for our securities, including the stock.

        Cyclicality in the industrial chemicals industry has in the past and may in the future result in reduced operating margins or in operating losses.

        Consumption of the basic chemicals that we manufacture, in particular those in acetyl products, such as methanol, formaldehyde, acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer, has increased significantly over the past 30 years. Despite this growth in consumption, producers have experienced alternating periods of inadequate capacity and excess capacity for these products. Periods of inadequate capacity, including some due to raw material shortages, have usually resulted in increased selling prices and operating margins. This has often been followed by periods of capacity additions, which have resulted in declining capacity utilization rates, selling prices and operating margins.

        We expect that these cyclical trends in selling prices and operating margins relating to capacity shortfalls and additions will likely persist in the future, principally due to the continuing combined impact of five factors:

        We believe that the basic chemicals industry, particularly in the commodity chemicals manufactured by our Chemical Products segment, is currently characterized by overcapacity, and that there may be further capacity additions in the next few years.



        The length and depth of product and industry business cycles of our markets, particularly in the automotive, electrical, construction and textile industries, may result in reduced operating margins or in operating losses.

        Some of the markets in which our customers participate, such as the automotive, electrical, construction and textile industries, are cyclical in nature, thus posing a risk to us which is beyond our control. These markets are highly competitive, to a large extent driven by end-use markets, and may experience overcapacity, all of which may affect demand for and pricing of our products.

        We are subject to risks associated with the increased volatility in raw materials prices and the availability of key raw materials.

        We purchase significant amounts of natural gas, ethylene, butane, and propylene from third parties for use in our production of basic chemicals in the Chemical Products segment, principally methanol, formaldehyde, acetic acid, vinyl acetate monomer, as well as oxo products. We use a portion of our output of these chemicals, in turn, as inputs in the production of further products in all our segments. We also purchase significant amounts of cellulose or wood pulp for use in our production of cellulose acetate in the Acetate Products segment. We purchase significant amounts of natural gas, electricity, coal and fuel oil to supply the energy required in our production processes.

        Prices of natural gas, oil and other hydrocarbons have increased dramatically in 2004. To the extent this trend continues and we are unable to pass through these price increases to our customers, our operating profit and results of operations may be less favorable than expected.

        We are exposed to any volatility in the prices of our raw materials and energy. Although we have agreements providing for the supply of natural gas, ethylene, propylene, wood pulp, electricity, coal and fuel oil, the contractual prices for these raw materials and energy vary with market conditions and may be highly volatile. Factors which have caused volatility in our raw material prices in the past and which may do so in the future include:

        We strive to improve profit margins of many of our products through price increases when warranted and accepted by the market; however, our operating margins may decrease if we cannot pass on increased raw material prices to customers, or we may not be able to capture the benefit of raw material price declines if raw material prices fall to levels below those at which we are committed to purchase under forward purchase contracts. Even in periods during which raw material prices decline, we may suffer decreasing operating profit margins if raw material price reductions occur at a slower rate than decreases in the selling prices of our products.

        A substantial portion of our products and raw materials are commodities whose prices fluctuate as market supply/demand fundamentals change. We manage our exposure through the use of derivative instruments and forward purchase contracts for commodity price hedging, entering into long-term supply agreements, and multi-year purchasing and sales agreements. Our policy, for the majority of our natural gas and butane requirements, allows entering into supply agreements and forward purchase or cash-settled swap contracts, generally for up to 24 months. During the first nine months of 2004, we did not enter into any forward contracts for our butane requirements and, for natural gas, had positions covering about 35% of our North American Chemical Products segment requirements primarily as a result of forward contracts entered into in 2003. In the future, we may modify our practice of purchasing a portion of our commodity requirements forward, and consider utilizing a variety of other raw material hedging instruments in addition to forward purchase contracts in accordance with changes in market conditions. As these forward contracts expire, we may be exposed to future price fluctuations if the forward purchase contracts are not replaced, or if we elect to replace them, we may have to do



so at higher costs. Although we seek to offset increases in raw material prices with corresponding increases in the prices of our products, we may not be able to do so, and there may be periods when such product price increases lag behind raw material cost increases.

        We have a policy of maintaining, when available, multiple sources of supply for raw materials. However, some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials, such as carbon monoxide and acetaldehyde. We may not be able to obtain sufficient raw materials due to unforeseen developments that would cause an interruption in supply. Even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material, these sources may not make up for the loss of a major supplier. Nor can there be any guarantee that profitability will not be affected should we be required to qualify additional sources of supply in the event of the loss of a sole or a major supplier.

        Failure to develop new products and production technologies or to implement productivity and cost reduction initiatives successfully may harm our competitive position.

        Our operating results, especially in our Performance Products and Technical Polymers Ticona segments, depend significantly on the development of commercially viable new products, product grades and applications, as well as production technologies. If we are unsuccessful in developing new products, applications and production processes in the future, our competitive position and operating results will be negatively affected. Likewise, we have undertaken and are continuing to undertake initiatives in all segments to improve productivity and performance and to generate cost savings. These initiatives may not be completed or beneficial or the estimated cost savings from such activities may not be realized.

        Frankfurt airport expansion could require us to reduce production capacity of, limit expansion potential of, or incur relocation costs for our Kelsterbach plant which would lead to significant additional costs.

        The Frankfurt airport's expansion plans include the construction of an additional runway. One of the three sites under consideration, the northwest option, would be located in close proximity to our Kelsterbach production plant. The construction of this particular runway could have a negative effect on the plant's current production capacity and future development. While the government of the state of Hesse and the owner of the Frankfurt airport promote the expansion of the northwest option, it is uncertain whether this option is in accordance with applicable laws. Although the government of the state of Hesse expects the plan approval for the airport expansion in 2007 and the start of operations in 2009-2010, neither the final outcome of this matter nor its timing can be predicted at this time.

        Environmental regulations and other obligations relating to environmental matters could subject us to liability for fines, clean-ups and other damages, require us to incur significant costs to modify our operations and increase our manufacturing and delivery costs.

        Costs related to our compliance with environmental laws concerning, and potential obligations with respect to, contaminated sites may have a significant negative impact on our operating results. These include obligations related to sites currently or formerly owned or operated by us, or where waste from our operations was disposed. We also have obligations related to the indemnity agreement contained in the demerger and transfer agreement between Celanese and Hoechst, also referred to as the demerger agreement, for environmental matters arising out of certain divestitures that took place prior to the demerger. Our accruals for environmental remediation obligations, $147 million as of September 30, 2004, may be insufficient if the assumptions underlying those accruals prove incorrect or if we are held responsible for currently undiscovered contamination. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Environmental Liabilities," notes 23 and 24 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Our operations are subject to extensive international, national, state, local, and other supranational laws and regulations that govern environmental and health and safety matters. We incur substantial capital and other costs to comply with these requirements. If we violate them, we can be held liable for substantial fines and other sanctions, including limitations on our operations as a result of changes to or revocations of environmental permits involved. Stricter environmental, safety and health laws,



regulations and enforcement policies could result in substantial costs and liabilities to us or limitations on our operations and could subject our handling, manufacture, use, reuse or disposal of substances or pollutants to more rigorous scrutiny than at present. Consequently, compliance with these laws could result in significant capital expenditures as well as other costs and liabilities and our business and operating results may be less favorable than expected. Due to new air regulations in the United States, management expects that there will be a temporary increase in compliance costs that will total approximately $30 million to $45 million through 2007. For example, the Miscellaneous Organic National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations, and various approaches to regulating boilers and incinerators, including the NESHAPs for Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters, will impose additional requirements on our operations. Although some of these rules have been finalized, a significant portion of the NESHAPs for Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters regulation that provides for a low risk alternative method of compliance for hydrogen chloride emissions has been challenged in federal court. We cannot predict the outcome of this challenge, which could, if successful, increase our costs by, according to our estimates, approximately $50 million above the $30 to $45 million noted above through 2007 to comply with this regulation. As another example, a recent European Union directive requires a trading system for carbon dioxide emissions to be in place by January 1, 2005. Accordingly, an Emission Trading System has been introduced by German and Belgian legislation, coming into effect at the beginning of 2005. This legislation will affect our power plants at the Kelsterbach and Oberhausen sites in Germany and the Lanaken site in Belgium, as well as power plants operated by InfraServ entities on sites at which we operate. We and the InfraServ entities may be required to purchase carbon dioxide credits, which could result in increased operating costs, or may be required to develop additional cost-effective methods to reduce carbon dioxide emissions further, which could result in increased capital expenditures.

        We are also involved in several claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings relating to environmental matters. An adverse outcome in any of them may negatively affect our earnings and cash flows in a particular reporting period.

        Changes in environmental, health and safety regulatory requirements could lead to a decrease in demand for our products.

        New or revised governmental regulations relating to health, safety and the environment may also affect demand for our products.

        Pursuant to the European Union regulation on Risk Assessment of Existing Chemicals, the European Chemicals Bureau of the European Commission has been conducting risk assessments on approximately 140 major chemicals. Some of the chemicals initially being evaluated include vinyl acetate monomer or VAM, which we produce. These risk assessments entail a multi-stage process to determine to what extent the European Commission should classify the chemical as a carcinogen and, if so, whether this classification and related labeling requirements should apply only to finished products that contain specified threshold concentrations of a particular chemical. In the case of VAM, we currently do not expect a final ruling until mid-2005. We and other VAM producers are participating in this process with detailed scientific analyses supporting the industry's position that VAM is not a probable human carcinogen and that labeling of final products should not be required. If labeling is required, then it should depend on relatively high parts per million of residual VAM in these end products. We cannot predict the outcome or effect of any final ruling.

        Several recent studies have investigated possible links between formaldehyde exposure and various end points including leukemia. The International Agency for Research on Cancer or IARC recently reclassified formaldehyde from Group 2A (probable human carcinogen) to Group 1 (known human carcinogen) based on studies linking formaldehyde exposure to nasopharyngeal cancer, a rare cancer in humans. IARC also concluded that there is insufficient evidence for a causal association between leukemia and occupational exposure to formaldehyde, although it also characterized evidence for such



an association as strong. The results of IARC's review will be examined by government agencies with responsibility for setting worker and environmental exposure standards and labeling requirements. We are a producer of formaldehyde and plastics derived from formaldehyde. We are participating together with other producers and users in the evaluations of these findings. We cannot predict the final effect of IARC's reclassification.

        Other recent initiatives will potentially require toxicological testing and risk assessments of a wide variety of chemicals, including chemicals used or produced by us. These initiatives include the Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program and High Production Volume Chemical Initiative in the United States, as well as various European Commission programs, such as the new European Environment and Health Strategy, commonly known as SCALE, as well as the Proposal for the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals or REACH. REACH, which the European Commission proposed in October 2003, will establish a system to register and evaluate chemicals manufactured in, or imported to, the European Union. Depending on the final ruling, additional testing, documentation and risk assessments will occur for the chemical industry. This will affect European producers of chemicals as well as all chemical companies worldwide that export to member states of the European Union. The final ruling has not yet been decided.

        The above-mentioned assessments in the United States and Europe may result in heightened concerns about the chemicals involved and in additional requirements being placed on the production, handling, labeling or use of the subject chemicals. Such concerns and additional requirements could increase the cost incurred by our customers to use our chemical products and otherwise limit the use of these products, which could lead to a decrease in demand for these products.

        Our production facilities handle the processing of some volatile and hazardous materials that subject it to operating risks that could have a negative effect on its operating results.

        Our operations are subject to operating risks associated with chemical manufacturing, including the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and wastes. These hazards include, among other things:

        These operating risks can cause personal injury, property damage and environmental contamination, and may result in the shutdown of affected facilities and the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. The occurrence of any of these events may disrupt production and have a negative effect on the productivity and profitability of a particular manufacturing facility and our operating results and cash flows.

        We maintain property, business interruption and casualty insurance which we believe is in accordance with customary industry practices, but we cannot predict whether this insurance will be adequate to fully cover all potential hazards incidental to our business. We have established two captive insurance subsidiaries (Captives) that provide a portion of the total insurance coverage to us for certain of our lower tier property and casualty risks. They additionally provide coverage to third parties for their higher tier risk programs. If there were concurrent claims made on all policies issued by the Captives, sufficient capital may not be available for them to satisfy all claims against all such policies. As of September 30, 2004, the net retained concurrent aggregate risk of all policies written by the Captives, after reinsuring higher tier risks with third party insurance companies, net of established reserves, amounted to approximately $516 million. This amount of exposure is further offset by the underlying equity of the Captives amounting to approximately $370 million at September 30, 2004.



        Our significant non-U.S. operations expose us to global exchange rate fluctuations that could impact our profitability.

        We are exposed to market risk through commercial and financial operations. Our market risk consists principally of exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange and interest rates.

        As we conduct a significant portion of our operations outside the United States, fluctuations in currencies of other countries, especially the euro, may materially affect our operating results. For example, changes in currency exchange rates may affect:

        We use financial instruments to hedge our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. More than 90% of outstanding foreign currency contracts are used to hedge the foreign currency denominated intercompany net receivables. The net notional amounts under such foreign currency contracts outstanding at September 30, 2004 were $951 million. The hedging activity of foreign currency denominated intercompany net receivables resulted in a cash inflow of approximately $15 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. These positive effects may not be indicative of future effects.

        A substantial portion of our net sales is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In our consolidated financial statements, we translate our local currency financial results into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period or the exchange rate at the end of that period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, at a constant level of business, our reported international sales, earnings, assets and liabilities will be reduced because the local currency will translate into fewer U.S. dollars. We estimate that the translation effects of changes in the value of other currencies against the U.S. dollar increased net sales by approximately 4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, 7% for the year ended December 31, 2003 and increased net sales by approximately 2% in 2002. We estimate that the translation effects of changes in the value of other currencies against the U.S. dollar had minimal impact on total assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and increased total assets by approximately 5% in 2003.

        In addition to currency translation risks, we incur a currency transaction risk whenever one of our operating subsidiaries enters into either a purchase or a sales transaction using a currency different from the operating subsidiary's functional currency. Given the volatility of exchange rates, we may not be able to manage our currency transaction and/or translation risks effectively, or volatility in currency exchange rates may expose our financial condition or results of operations to a significant additional risk. Since a portion of our indebtedness is and will be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, a weakening of the U.S. dollar could make it more difficult for us to repay our indebtedness.

        Significant changes in pension fund investment performance or assumptions relating to pension costs may have a material effect on the valuation of pension obligations, the funded status of pension plans, and our pension cost.

        Our funding policy for pension plans is to accumulate plan assets that, over the long run, will approximate the present value of projected benefit obligations. Our pension cost is materially affected by the discount rate used to measure pension obligations, the level of plan assets available to fund those obligations at the measurement date and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Significant changes in investment performance or a change in the portfolio mix of invested assets can result in corresponding increases and decreases in the valuation of plan assets, particularly equity securities, or in a change of the expected rate of return on plan assets. A change in the discount rate would result in a significant increase or decrease in the valuation of pension obligations, affecting the reported funded status of our pension plans as well as the net periodic pension cost in the following fiscal years. Similarly, changes in the expected return on plan assets can result in significant changes in the net periodic pension cost of the following fiscal years. As of December 31, 2003, our underfunded



position related to our defined benefit pension plans was $879 million. During 2004, we voluntarily contributed approximately $457 million to the plans. In 2004, no funding is statutorily required for any of our sponsored plans.

        We have preliminarily recorded a significant amount of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets, and we may never realize the full value of our intangible assets.

        In connection with the Transactions, we have recorded a significant amount of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill and other net identifiable intangible assets were approximately $934 million as of September 30, 2004, or 13% of our total assets based on preliminary purchase accounting. Goodwill and net identifiable intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition and, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, will be reviewed at least annually for impairment. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in our performance, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations, including changes that restrict the activities of or affect the products and services sold by our business, and a variety of other factors. The amount of any quantified impairment must be expensed immediately as a charge to results of operations. Depending on future circumstances, it is possible that we may never realize the full value of our intangible assets. Any future determination of impairment of a significant portion of goodwill or other identifiable intangible assets would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

        Under its 1999 demerger agreement with Hoechst, Celanese agreed to indemnify Hoechst for environmental liabilities that Hoechst may incur with respect to Celanese's German production sites, which were transferred from Hoechst to Celanese in connection with the demerger. Celanese also has an obligation to indemnify Hoechst against liabilities for environmental damages or contamination arising under certain divestiture agreements entered into by Hoechst prior to the demerger. As the indemnification obligations depend on the occurrence of unpredictable future events, the costs associated with them are not yet determinable and may materially affect operating results.

        Celanese's obligation to indemnify Hoechst against liabilities for environmental contamination in connection with the divestiture agreements is subject to the following thresholds (translated into U.S. dollars using the September 30, 2004 exchange rate):

        Celanese has made payments through September 30, 2004 of $37 million for environmental contamination liabilities in connection with the divestiture agreements, and may be required to make additional payments in the future. As of September 30, 2004, we have reserves of approximately $47 million for this contingency, and may be required to record additional reserves in the future.

        Also, Celanese has undertaken in the demerger agreement to indemnify Hoechst to the extent that Hoechst is required to discharge liabilities, including tax liabilities, in relation to assets included in the demerger, where such liabilities have not been demerged due to transfer or other restrictions. Celanese has not made any payments to Hoechst in 2004 and did not make any payments in either 2003 or 2002 in connection with this indemnity.

        Under the demerger agreement, Celanese will also be responsible, directly or indirectly, for all of Hoechst's obligations to past employees of businesses that were demerged to Celanese. Under the



demerger agreement, Hoechst agreed to indemnify Celanese from liabilities (other than liabilities for environmental contamination) stemming from the agreements governing the divestiture of Hoechst's polyester businesses, which were demerged to Celanese, insofar as such liabilities relate to the European part of that business. Hoechst has also agreed to bear 80 percent of the financial obligations arising in connection with the government investigation and litigation associated with the sorbates industry for price fixing described in "Business—Legal Proceedings—Sorbates Antitrust Actions" and note 23 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, and Celanese has agreed to bear the remaining 20 percent.

        Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly and affect our operating results.

        Certain of our borrowings, primarily borrowings under the senior credit facilities, are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, which we expect to occur, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same, and our net income and cash available for servicing our indebtedness would decrease. On a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2004, we had $1,656 million of variable rate debt. A 1% increase in interest rates would increase annual interest expense by approximately $17 million.

        We may enter into interest rate swap agreements to reduce the exposure of interest rate risk inherent in our debt portfolio. We have, in the past, used swaps for hedging purposes only.

        Because our Sponsor controls us and will continue to control us after this offering, the influence of our public shareholders over significant corporate actions will be limited, and conflicts of interest between our Sponsor and us or you could arise in the future.

        After the consummation of this offering, our Sponsor (as defined in this prospectus) will beneficially own approximately 58.2% of our outstanding common stock and will own approximately 62.6% of our outstanding common stock if the underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised. As a result, our Sponsor, through its control over the composition of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and its control of the majority of the voting power of our common stock, has effective control over our decisions to enter into any corporate transaction and will have the ability to prevent any transaction that requires the approval of equityholders regardless of whether or not other equityholders or noteholders believe that any such transactions are in their own best interests. For example, our Sponsor effectively could cause us to make acquisitions that increase our indebtedness or sell revenue-generating assets. Additionally, our Sponsor is in the business of making investments in companies and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Our Sponsor may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. So long as our Sponsor continues to own a significant amount of our equity, even if such amount is less than 50%, it will continue to be able to significantly influence or effectively control our decisions. Under the amended and restated shareholders' agreement between us and the Original Stockholders which are affiliates of the Sponsor, such Original Stockholders will be entitled to designate all nominees for election to our board of directors for so long as they hold at least 25% of the total voting power of our common stock. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—New Arrangements—Shareholders' Agreement." Thereafter, although our Sponsor will not have an explicit contractual right to do so, it may still nominate directors in its capacity as a stockholder.

        Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will renounce any interest or expectancy that we have in, or beingright to be offered an opportunity to participate in, specified business opportunities. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that none of the Original Stockholders (including the Sponsor) or their affiliates or any director who is not employed by us (including any non-employee director who serves as one of our officers in both his director and officer capacities) or his or her affiliates will have any duty to refrain from (i) engaging in a corporate opportunity in the



opportunity in the same or similar lines of business in which we or our affiliates now engage or propose to engage or (ii) otherwise competing with us. In addition, in the event that any of the Original Stockholders (including the Sponsor) or any non-employee director acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or other business opportunity which may be a corporate opportunity for itself or himself or its or his affiliates and for us or our affiliates, such Original Stockholder or non-employee director will have no duty to communicate or offer such transaction or business opportunity to us and may take any such opportunity for themselves or offer it to other companies in which they have an investmentanother person or other business relationship.entity.

        We are a "controlled company" within the meaning of The New York Stock Exchange rules and, as a result, are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements.

        Upon completion of this offering, our Sponsor will continue to control a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. As a result, we are a "controlled company" within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards. Under the New York Stock Exchange rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by another company is a "controlled company" and need not comply with certain requirements, including (1) the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (2) the requirement that the nominating committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee's purpose and responsibilities, (3) the requirement that the compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee's purpose and responsibilities and (4) the requirement for an annual performance evaluation of the nominating/corporate governance and compensation committees. Following this offering, we intend to utilize these exemptions. As a result, we will not have a majority of independent directors nor will our nominating and compensation committees consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements.

        Our future success will depend in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, and our inability to enforce these rights could reduce our ability to maintain our market position and our margins.

        We attach great importance to patents, trademarks, copyrights and product designs in order to protect our investment in research and development, manufacturing and marketing. Our policy is to seek the widest possible protection for significant product and process developments in its major markets. Patents may cover products, processes, intermediate products and product uses. Protection for individual products extends for varying periods in accordance with the date of patent application filing and the legal life of patents in the various countries. The protection afforded, which may also vary from country to country, depends upon the type of patent and its scope of coverage. Our continued growth strategy may bring us to regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce. We are currently pursuing a number of matters relating to the infringement of our acetic acid patents. If these efforts are unsuccessful, our revenues, results of operations and cash flows in the Chemical Products segment may be adversely affected. Some of our earlier acetic acid patents will expire in 2007; other patents covering acetic acid are presently pending.

        As patents expire, the products and processes described and claimed in those patents become generally available for use by the public. Our European and U.S. patents for making Sunett, an important product in our Performance Products segment, expire in 2005, which will reduce our ability to realize revenues from making Sunett due to increased competition and potential limitations and will result in our results of operations and cash flows relating to the product being less favorable than today.

        We also seek to register trademarks extensively as a means of protecting the brand names of our products, which brand names become more important once the corresponding patents have expired. If we are not successful in protecting our trademark rights, our revenues, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.


Risks Related to this Offering

        There is no existing market for our common stock, and we do not know if one will develop to provide you with adequate liquidity.

        There has not been a public market for the Issuer's common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our company will lead to the development of a trading market on The New York Stock Exchange or otherwise or how liquid that market might become. The initial public offering price for the shares will be determined by negotiations between us and the representative of the underwriters and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market following this offering.

        Future sales of our shares could depress the market price of our common stock.

        The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of common stock in the market after the offering or the perception that such sales could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.

        We, our executive officers and directors and the Original Stockholders have agreed with the underwriters not to sell, dispose of or hedge any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, subject to specified exceptions, during the period from the date of this prospectus continuing through the date that is 180 days after the date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Lehman Brothers Inc.

        After this offering, we anticipate having 158,675,271 shares of common stock outstanding (consisting of 58,937,909 shares of Series A common stock and 99,737,362 shares of Series B common stock). Of those shares, the 50,000,000 shares of Series A common stock we are offering (excluding shares issuable under the underwriters' over-allotment option) will be freely tradeable. The 108,675,271 shares of common stock outstanding (consisting of 8,937,909 shares of Series A common stock and 99,737,362 shares of Series B common stock) will be eligible for resale from time to time after the expiration of the 180-day lock-up period, subject to contractual and Securities Act restrictions. None of those shares may be currently resold under Rule 144(k) without regard to volume limitations and approximately 108,675,271 shares may be sold subject to the volume, manner of sale, holding period and other conditions of Rule 144. After the expiration of the 180-day lock-up period, the Original Stockholders, which collectively beneficially own 107,237,362 shares (consisting of 7,500,000 shares of Series A common stock assuming no exercise of the underwriters' over allotment option to purchase additional shares of Series A common stock and 99,737,26299,737,362 shares of Series B common stock which will automatically convert to Series A common stock after the payment of the special Series B common stock dividend and may also be converted into Series A common stock at any time at the option of the holder), will have the ability to cause us to register the resale of their shares.

        The market price of our common stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

        Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of the common stock in spite of our operating performance. In addition, our operating results could be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors, and in response, the market price of our common stock could decrease significantly. You may be unable to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the initial public offering price.

        The book value of shares of common stock purchased in the offering will be immediately diluted.

        Investors who purchase common stock in the offering will suffer immediate dilution of $27.53 per share in the pro forma net tangible book value per share after giving effect to the contemplated use of proceeds from the Concurrent Financings. See "Dilution."



        Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as our shareholders' rights plan may discourage a takeover attempt.

        Provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so might be beneficial to our shareholders. Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws impose various procedural and other requirements, which could make it more difficult for shareholders to effect certain corporate actions. For example, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of unissued series of preferred stock, without any vote or action by our shareholders. Thus, our board of directors can authorize and issue shares of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting or other rights of holders of our Series A common stock. These rights may have the effect of delaying or deterring a change of control of our company. In addition, a change of control of our company may be delayed or deterred as a result of our having three classes of directors (each class elected for a three year term) or as a result of the shareholders' rights plan expected to be adopted by our board of directors prior to the consummation of this offering. In addition, we would be required to issue additional shares of our Series A common stock to holders of the preferred stock who convert following a fundamental change. See "Description of Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock." These provisions could limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. See "Description of Capital Stock."



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This prospectus contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to us that are based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, us. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our strategies, plans, objectives, expectations, intentions, expenditures, and assumptions and other statements contained in this prospectus that are not historical facts. When used in this document, words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan" and "project" and similar expressions, as they relate to us are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Further, certain forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate.

        Many factors could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things:


        Many of these factors are macroeconomic in nature and are, therefore, beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from those described in this prospectus as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, planned or projected. We neither intend nor assume any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates.



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

        The body of generally accepted accounting principles is commonly referred to as "GAAP." For this purpose, a non-GAAP financial measure is generally defined by the SEC as one that purports to measure historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows but excludes or includes amounts that would not be so adjusted in the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure. From time to time we disclose non-GAAP financial measures, primarily EBITDA, as defined below. The non-GAAP financial measures described in this prospectus should not be viewed in isolation and are not a substitute for GAAP measures of earnings and cash flows.

EBITDA

        EBITDA is defined as earnings (loss) from continuing operations, plus interest expense net of interest income, income taxes and depreciation and amortization.

        Management uses EBITDA as a basis for measuring performance:

        Management believes EBITDA is helpful in highlighting trends on an overall basis and in the business segments because EBITDA excludes the results of decisions that are outside the control of operating management and can differ significantly from company to company depending on long-term strategic decisions regarding capital structure, the tax jurisdictions in which the company operates and capital investments. In addition, EBITDA provides more comparability between the historical results of Celanese AG and our results which reflect purchase accounting and the new capital structure.

Limitations

        EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. An investor or potential investor may find any one or all of these items important in evaluating performance, results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Some of these limitations are:

        Management compensates for the limitations of using non-GAAP financial measures by using them to supplement GAAP results to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting the business than GAAP results alone. Management also uses other metrics to evaluate capital structure, tax planning and capital investment decisions. For example, management uses credit ratings


and net debt ratios to evaluate capital structure, effective tax rate by jurisdiction to evaluate tax planning, and payback period and internal rate of return to evaluate capital investments. Management also uses trade working capital to evaluate its investment in receivables and inventory, net of payables.

        EBITDA is also presented because management believes it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of issuers. Management believes that EBITDA provides useful information for comparing companies in the same industry and across different industries. For example:

        Investors or potential investors should not rely on EBITDA as a substitute for any GAAP financial measure. In addition, calculations of EBITDA contained in this prospectus may or may not be consistent with that of other companies. We strongly urge investors or potential investors to review the reconciliations of EBITDA contained in this prospectus, including the related explanations, the limitations of these exclusions described above and the other financial information contained in this prospectus. We also strongly urge investors or potential investors not to rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.



THE TRANSACTIONS

        As used in this prospectus, the term "Transactions" means, collectively, the Tender Offer, the Original Financing, the Refinancing and the Senior Discount Notes Offering described below. Our current ownership structure is summarized under "The Recent Restructuring."

The Tender Offer and the Original Financing

        Pursuant to the Tender Offer, in April 2004 the Purchaser, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Issuer, acquired, at a price of €32.50 per share, a total of 41,588,227 Celanese Shares, representing approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares outstanding on that date.

        In addition, as a part of the Tender Offer, the Purchaser agreed to refinance certain existing debt of Celanese, pre-fund certain pension obligations of Celanese, pre-fund certain contingencies and certain obligations linked to the value of the Celanese Shares, such as the payment of fair cash compensation under the Domination Agreement for the remaining Celanese Shares, and payment obligations related to outstanding stock appreciation rights, stock options and interest payments, provide additional funds for working capital and other general corporate purposes, and pay related fees and expenses. The sources and uses of funds used in connection with the Tender Offer and the Original Financing are set forth in the table below. See "Description of Indebtedness" for a description of the senior credit facilities.

Sources
 Uses
(in millions)

 (in millions)

Revolving Credit Facilities(1) $ Aggregate Tender Offer Price(5) $1,624
Term Loan Facility  608 Pension Contribution(6)  463
Senior Subordinated Bridge Loan Facilities(2)  1,565 Refinancing of Existing Debt(7)  175
Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Shares(3)  200 Available Cash(8)  555
Cash Equity Investments(4)  650 Estimated Fees and Expenses  206
  
   
 Total Sources $3,023             Total Uses $3,023
  
   

(1)
The revolving credit facilities provide for borrowings of up to $608 million. No amounts thereunder were borrowed in connection with the Tender Offer and the Original Financing.

(2)
Represents $814 million of the Senior Subordinated Bridge B and $751 million of the Senior Subordinated Bridge C Loan variable rate borrowings (which includes the U.S. dollar equivalent of a €450 million tranche). The senior subordinated bridge loan facilities were originally due in 2014, subject to certain conditions.

(3)
Represents $200 million of the Issuer's mandatorily redeemable preferred shares. The mandatorily redeemable preferred shares were redeemed on July 1, 2004. See "—The Refinancing."

(4)
Consisted of cash equity contributions of $650 million from the Original Stockholders.

(5)
Represents the U.S. dollar equivalent of the total amount of consideration at €32.50 per ordinary share for approximately 84% of the then-outstanding Celanese Shares.

(6)
Represents the amount to pre-fund certain of Celanese's pension obligations.

(7)
Represents the amount of variable rate loans of Celanese repaid subsequent to the Tender Offer.

(8)
Represents cash available to purchase remaining outstanding Celanese Shares, to pay certain contingencies and obligations of Celanese linked to the value of the Celanese Shares, to repay additional existing indebtedness, to pay interest on the senior subordinated notes and to make loans to Celanese and its subsidiaries for working capital and general corporate purposes.

The Refinancing

        BCP Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A. used the proceeds from its offerings of $1,225 million and €200 million principal amount of the senior subordinated notes in June and July 2004, together with available cash and borrowings under a $350 million senior secured floating rate term loan to repay



its two senior subordinated bridge loan facilities, plus accrued interest, to redeem the mandatorily redeemable preferred shares and to pay related fees and expenses. See "Description of Indebtedness" for a description of the senior subordinated notes and the floating rate term loan.

Sources
 Uses
(in millions)

 (in millions)

Senior Subordinated Notes(1) $1,475 Refinancing of Senior Subordinated Bridge Loan Facilities(2) $1,594
Floating Rate Term Loan  350 Redemption of the Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Shares  227
Available Cash  47 Estimated Fees and Expenses  51
  
   
 Total Sources $1,872             Total Uses $1,872
  
   

(1)
Includes the U.S. dollar equivalent of the euro notes.

(2)
Represents $814 million of the Senior Subordinated Bridge B and $751 million of Senior Subordinated Bridge C Loan variable rate borrowings, plus accrued interest on the senior subordinated bridge loan facilities.

Senior Discount Notes Offering

        In September 2004, Crystal US Holdings 3 L.L.C. ("Crystal LLC") and Crystal US Sub 3 Corp., a subsidiary of Crystal LLC, issued $853 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of their Senior Discount Notes due 2014. The issuers of the senior discount notes used the net proceeds of $500 million from the offering to make a return of capital distribution to the Issuer, which in turn made a distribution to the Original Stockholders, and to pay fees and expenses. Until October 1, 2009, interest on the senior discount notes will accrue in the form of an increase in the accreted value of such notes. See "Description of Indebtedness—Senior Discount Notes due 2014."

Post-Tender Offer Events

        After the completion of the Tender Offer and the Original Financing, we or our affiliates entered into or intend to pursue some or all of the following:

        Delisting.    The Celanese Shares were delisted from the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") on June 2, 2004. Celanese AG may also apply to revoke the admission of the Celanese Shares to the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, which would require, among other things, a resolution at the shareholders' meeting of Celanese AG with the majority of the votes cast in favor of such resolution. If the Celanese Shares were to be delisted from both the NYSE and from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, the Purchaser or Celanese AG would have to offer the then outstanding minority shareholders of Celanese AG fair cash compensation in exchange for their Celanese Shares determined as described below.

        Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement.    On June 22, 2004, the Purchaser entered into a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (Beherrschungs- und Gewinnabführungsvertrag) with Celanese AG (the "Domination Agreement"), pursuant to which Celanese AG agreed to submit itself to the direction of, and to transfer its entire profits to, the Purchaser and the Purchaser agreed to compensate Celanese AG for any annual losses (Jahresfehlbetrag) incurred during the term of the Domination Agreement. The Domination Agreement and a related change to Celanese AG's fiscal year were submitted to a shareholder vote and approved at an extraordinary general meeting held on July 30-31, 2004. The Domination Agreement was registered in the commercial register on August 2, 2004 and became operative on October 1, 2004. The Domination Agreement is subject to legal challenges instituted by dissenting shareholders. Minority shareholders have filed nine actions against Celanese AG in the Frankfurt District Court (Landgericht), seeking, among other things, to set aside the shareholder resolutions passed at the extraordinary general meeting held on July 30 and 31, 2004 based, among other things, on the alleged violation of procedural requirements and information rights of the shareholders, to declare the Domination Agreement and the change in the fiscal year void and



to prohibit Celanese AG from performing its obligations under the Domination Agreement. In addition, a German court could revoke the registration of the Domination Agreement in the commercial register. On August 2, 2004, two minority shareholders instituted public register proceedings with the Königstein Local Court (Amtsgericht) and the Frankfurt District Court, both with a view to have the registration of the Domination Agreement in the Commercial Register deleted (Amtslöschungsverfahren). See "Business—Legal Proceedings."

        Pursuant to the Domination Agreement, the entire annual statutory profits of Celanese AG, if any, less any loss carried forward from the previous fiscal year, less any amount to be allocated to the statutory capital reserve (gesetzliche Rücklage) and less any amount to be allocated to other profit reserves (andere Gewinnrücklagen) upon approval by the Purchaser, will be transferred to the Purchaser. If, however, during any fiscal year during the operative term of the Domination Agreement, Celanese AG incurs an annual loss (Jahresfehlbetrag), the Purchaser would have to pay to Celanese AG an amount equal to such loss to the extent that the respective annual loss is not fully compensated for by dissolving other profit reserves (andere Gewinnrücklagen) accrued at Celanese AG since the date on which the Domination Agreement became operative (Verlustausgleichspflicht). Such payment obligation would accrue at the end of any fiscal year of Celanese AG in which an annual loss was incurred and such accrual would be independent from the adoption of the financial statements. In the event that profits of Celanese AG (including distributable profit reserves accrued and carried forward during the term of the Domination Agreement) or valuable counterclaims by the Purchaser against Celanese AG, which can be off-set against loss compensation claims by Celanese AG, are not sufficient to cover such annual loss, the Purchaser will be required to compensate Celanese AG for any such shortfall by making a cash payment equal to the amount of such shortfall. In such event, the Purchaser may not have sufficient funds to distribute to us for payment of our obligations and, unless the Purchaser is able to obtain funds from a source other than annual profits of Celanese AG, the Purchaser may not be able to satisfy its obligation to fund such shortfall. BCP Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A. and BCP Crystal have each agreed to provide the Purchaser with financing to further strengthen the Purchaser's ability to be in a position at all times to fulfill all of its obligations when they become due under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement and to ensure that the Purchaser will perform all of its obligations under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement when such obligations become due, including, without limitation, the obligations to pay a guaranteed fixed annual payment to the outstanding minority shareholders of Celanese AG, to offer to acquire all outstanding Celanese Shares from the minority shareholders in return for payment of fair cash consideration and to compensate Celanese AG for any annual loss incurred by Celanese AG during the term of the Domination Agreement. If BCP Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A. and/or BCP Crystal are obligated to make payments under such guarantees or other security to the Purchaser and/or the minority shareholders, we may not have sufficient funds to make payments on our debt or to make funds available to the Issuer.

        As a consequence of entering into the Domination Agreement, § 305(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz) requires that, upon the Domination Agreement becoming operative, the Purchaser must at the request of each remaining minority shareholder of Celanese AG, acquire such shareholders' registered ordinary shares of Celanese AG in exchange for payment of "fair cash compensation" (angemessene Barabfindung). As required under § 305(3) sentence 3 of the German Stock Corporation Act, the Purchaser will pay to all minority shareholders who tender into such offer and whose shares are paid for after the day following the date the Domination Agreement becomes operative, interest on the offer price from such day until the day preceding the date of settlement at a rate of 2% per annum plus the base rate (as defined in § 247 of the German Civil Code (BGB)) per annum prevailing from time to time, as reduced by any guaranteed dividend payments. The mandatory offer required pursuant to § 305(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act is not a voluntary public takeover offer or any other offer under the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act (Wertpapiererwerbs-und Übernahmegesetz) or a takeover or tender offer under any other applicable German law. However, it may be considered a tender offer under applicable laws of the United States of America. Therefore, in



order to comply with applicable U.S. securities laws, the Purchaser commenced an offer on September 2, 2004, which is continuing as of the date of this prospectus. The terms of this offer are set forth in the offer document, dated September 2, 2004, which was filed with the SEC under cover of Schedule TO on the same day. As of December 6, 2004, pursuant to this offer the Purchaser had acquired over 615,000 Celanese Shares. On December 29, 2004, the closing price of the Celanese Shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange was €45.20. At the fair cash compensation offer price of €41.92 per share required by the Domination Agreement for all Celanese Shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004 not already owned by the Purchaser, the total amount of funds necessary to purchase such remaining outstanding Celanese Shares would be €348 million, plus accrued interest from October 2, 2004. The Purchaser expects to use a significant portion of its available cash to pay for any of the remaining outstanding Celanese Shares that it may acquire. In addition, if Celanese AG delists the Celanese Shares from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, the Purchaser effects a squeeze-out or Celanese AG is converted into a limited partnership or a limited liability company, as described below, the Purchaser and/or Celanese AG must in each case make another offer to the then remaining minority shareholders of Celanese AG of fair cash compensation in exchange for their Celanese Shares or, in the case of a conversion, in exchange for their equity interest in the entity that results from the conversion. The €41.92 per share fair cash compensation, plus interest, required to be offered to minority shareholders in connection with the Domination Agreement is greater than the Tender Offer price. The amount of fair cash compensation is currently under review in special award proceedings (Spruchverfahren). The amount of fair cash compensation per share to be offered upon the occurrence of any other such event may be equal to, higher or lower than, the Tender Offer price or the fair cash compensation of €41.92, plus interest, offered pursuant to the Domination Agreement.

        Any minority shareholder who elects not to sell its shares to the Purchaser will be entitled to remain a shareholder of Celanese AG and to receive a gross guaranteed fixed annual payment on its shares (Ausgleich) of €3.27 per Celanese Share less certain corporate taxes in lieu of any future dividend. Taking into account the circumstances and the tax rates at the time of entering into the Domination Agreement, the net guaranteed fixed annual payment is €2.89 per share for a full fiscal year. The net guaranteed fixed annual payment may, depending on applicable corporate tax rates, in the future be higher, lower or the same as €2.89 in lieu of any future dividends determined as described below under "—Determination of the Amount to be Paid to the Minority Shareholders."

        As described in "Risk Factors," due to legal challenges, there is no assurance that the Domination Agreement will remain operative in its current form. If the Domination Agreement ceases to be operative, the Purchaser cannot directly give instructions to the Celanese AG board of management. However, irrespective of whether a domination agreement is in place between the Purchaser and Celanese AG, under German law Celanese AG is effectively controlled by the Purchaser because of the Purchaser's 84% ownership of the Celanese Shares. The Purchaser has the ability, through a variety of means, to utilize its controlling rights to, among other things, (1) ultimately cause a domination agreement to become operative; (2) use its ability, through its 84% voting power at any shareholders' meetings of Celanese AG, to elect the shareholder representatives on the supervisory board and to thereby effectively control the appointment and removal of the members of the Celanese AG board of management; and (3) effect all decisions that a majority shareholder is permitted to make under German law. The controlling rights of the Purchaser constitute a controlling financial interest for accounting purposes and result in the Purchaser being required to consolidate Celanese AG as of the date of acquisition.

        Change in Fiscal Year.    At the extraordinary general meeting on July 30 and 31, 2004, Celanese AG shareholders also approved a change of Celanese AG's fiscal year and a corresponding change of Celanese AG's statutes in order to take advantage of the consolidated tax filing status. Therefore, from September 30, 2004 onwards, Celanese AG's fiscal year will begin on October 1 and end on September 30 of the following year. A short fiscal year ran from January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004. The Issuer's fiscal year runs from January 1 to December 31.



        Subsequent Purchases of Celanese Shares.    The Purchaser may from time to time purchase or be required to purchase any or all of the outstanding Celanese Shares not owned by it in market transactions or otherwise. Examples of instances in which the Purchaser may be required to purchase additional Celanese Shares include the ongoing mandatory offer relating to the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement entered into by the Purchaser and Celanese AG, or additional mandatory offers required by actions that the Purchaser or its affiliates may take in the future, such as a possible delisting of the Celanese Shares from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, a possible squeeze-out of the minority shareholders of Celanese AG or a possible conversion of Celanese AG into a different legal form. The Purchaser's decision to pursue subsequent voluntary purchases will depend on, among other factors, the then-prevailing market prices and any negotiated terms with minority shareholders. If the Purchaser purchases Celanese Shares in an individually negotiated purchase not over the stock exchange, and before the first anniversary of the publication of the final results of the Tender Offer for consideration higher than the Tender Offer price, it will be required to make additional compensating payments to sellers of Celanese Shares in the Tender Offer.

        Squeeze-out and Conversion.    If the Purchaser acquires Celanese Shares representing 95% or more of the registered ordinary share capital (excluding treasury shares) of Celanese AG, the Purchaser intends to require, as permitted under German law, the transfer to the Purchaser of the Celanese Shares owned by the then-outstanding minority shareholders of Celanese AG in exchange for fair cash compensation (the "Squeeze-out"), determined as described below under "—Determination of the Amount to be Paid to the Minority Shareholders." As an alternative to the Squeeze-out, the Purchaser might also consider converting Celanese AG from its current legal form of a stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft, AG) into either a limited partnership (Kommanditgesellschaft, KG) or a limited liability company (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, GmbH) in accordance with the provisions of the German Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz, UmwG). Such conversion would be subject to approval by the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the share capital of Celanese AG. The conversion would allow the Purchaser to take advantage of a more efficient governance structure as legal requirements applicable to GmbHs and KGs are in many respects less onerous than those applicable to AGs. As a result of such conversion, the Celanese Shares will be automatically delisted from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. However, if the Purchaser completely delists the Celanese Shares from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, effects a squeeze-out or converts Celanese AG into a limited partnership or a limited liability company, the Purchaser and/or Celanese AG must in each case offer the then remaining minority shareholders of Celanese AG fair cash compensation, as described below, in exchange for their Celanese Shares or, in the case of a conversion, in exchange for their equity interest in the entity that results from the conversion. The amount of the fair cash compensation per share may be equal to, higher or lower than the Tender Offer price or the fair cash compensation offered pursuant to the Domination Agreement.

        Determination of the Amount to be Paid to the Minority Shareholders.    The amount to be paid to the minority shareholders as fair cash compensation in exchange for their Celanese Shares in connection with the Domination Agreement becoming operative, the delisting from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, or a squeeze-out or, in the case of a conversion, in exchange for their equity interest in the entity resulting from such conversion, has been (in the case of the amount payable in connection with the Domination Agreement) or will be (in each other case) determined on the basis of the fair value of the enterprise of Celanese AG, determined by Celanese AG and/or the Purchaser in accordance with applicable German legal requirements, as of the date of the applicable resolution of Celanese AG's shareholders' meeting, and, except in the case of a delisting from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, examined by one or more duly qualified auditors chosen and appointed by the court. The amount of the guaranteed fixed annual payment in connection with the Domination Agreement becoming effective to minority shareholders who elect not to sell their Celanese Shares to the Purchaser but to remain a shareholder of Celanese AG was determined by the Purchaser and Celanese AG in accordance with applicable German law, on the basis of the hypothetical projected earnings of Celanese AG assuming a



full distribution of profits. The gross guaranteed fixed annual payment of €3.27 per share may be equal to, higher or lower than the actual otherwise distributable profits per share of Celanese AG. The €41.92 per share fair cash compensation, plus interest, offered to minority shareholders in connection with the Domination Agreement is greater than the Tender Offer price. The amount of cash compensation per share to be offered to minority shareholders in connection with any delisting from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, Squeeze-out or conversion, as applicable, may be equal to, higher or lower than, the Tender Offer price or the fair cash compensation of €41.92, plus interest, offered pursuant to the Domination Agreement. Furthermore, each of the guaranteed fixed annual payment and the fair cash compensation is subject to review by the court in award proceedings (Spruchverfahren) which have been instituted by several dissenting shareholders. If as a result of such award proceedings, the court increases the amount of the guaranteed fixed annual payment and/or the fair cash consideration, or if such increase is agreed between the parties in a court settlement, payments already made to minority shareholders pursuant to the offer required by the Domination Agreement would have to be increased accordingly with retroactive effect.

        Dividend.    At the annual shareholders' meeting on June 15, 2004, Celanese AG shareholders approved payment of a dividend on the Celanese Shares for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of €0.12 per share. The Purchaser expects that no dividend on the Celanese Shares for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 will be paid to Celanese AG's shareholders. As part of the preparation of the financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, Celanese AG conducted a valuation of its assets, which resulted in a further non-cash impairment charge to the value of CAC as of September 30, 2004. The size of this charge will prevent Celanese AG from declaring a dividend to its shareholders for the short fiscal year 2004. Any minority shareholder of Celanese AG who elects not to sell its shares to the Purchaser in connection with the offer to the minority shareholders will be entitled to remain a shareholder of Celanese AG and to receive the guaranteed fixed annual payment on its shares, in lieu of any future dividends. The amount of the guaranteed fixed annual payment to be paid to any minority shareholder who elects to retain its Celanese Shares was based on an analysis of the fair enterprise value of Celanese as of the date of the relevant shareholders' meeting assuming a full distribution of profits. The gross guaranteed fixed annual payment is €3.27 per Celanese Share less certain corporate taxes. See "—Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement."

        Recapitalization.    As of the date of this prospectus, we have one class of common stock, all of which is held by the Original Stockholders. Shortly before completion of this offering, we intend to complete a recapitalization in which we will create two series of common stock. The recapitalization, which may occur through a merger between us and a newly created wholly owned subsidiary of ours, a share exchange by the Original Stockholders or by other means, will result in the creation of Series A common stock and Series B common stock. The shares sold in the initial public offering of our common stock will be Series A common stock. The Original Stockholders will exchange the shares of common stock that they currently hold for an equivalent number of shares of Series B common stock, which will enable them to receive dividends as described under "Description of Capital Stock—Authorized Capitalization—Common Stock—Dividend Rights." Except for the special Series B common stock dividends which we expect to pay to the holders of outstanding shares of Series B common stock on or afterin April 7, 2005 (or earlier in the case of the portion of the dividend payable in shares of Series A common stock), the convertibility of Series B common stock into Series A common stock and the right of the Series B common stock to consent to other changes to our governing documents that would adversely affect the Series B common stock, shares of Series A common stock and shares of Series B common stock will be identical, including with respect to voting rights. The Series B common stock will automatically convert into Series A common stock upon payment of the special Series B common stock dividends, and may also be converted into Series A common stock at any time at the option of the holder. As used in this prospectus, the term "common stock", when used in reference to our capital structure before completion of this offering, means our existing single class of common



stock, and when used in reference to our capital structure following



completion of this offering, means, collectively, the Series A common stock and Series B common stock, unless otherwise specified.

        Any delisting from the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, squeeze-out or conversion would require approval by the shareholders of Celanese AG. While it is to be expected that in each case, the Purchaser will have the requisite majority in such meeting to assure approval of such measures, minority shareholders, irrespective of the size of their shareholding, may, within one month from the date of any such shareholder resolution, file an action with the court to have such resolution set aside. While such action would only be successful if the resolution was passed in violation of applicable laws and cannot be based on the unfairness of the amount to be paid to the minority shareholders, a shareholder action may substantially delay the implementation of the challenged shareholder resolution pending final resolution of the action. If such action proved to be successful, the action could prevent the implementation of a delisting, Squeeze-out or conversion. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any of the steps described above can be implemented timely or at all.

The Sponsor—The Blackstone Group

        Following the consummation of the offering of our Series A common stock, certain affiliates of The Blackstone Group ("Blackstone" or the "Sponsor") will beneficially own approximately 58.2% of our outstanding common stock and will own approximately 62.6% of our outstanding common stock if the underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised. Blackstone is a leading investment and advisory firm founded in 1985, with offices in New York, London and Hamburg. Blackstone manages the largest institutional private equity fund ever raised, a $6.5 billion fund raised in 2002. Since it began private equity investing in 1987, Blackstone has raised more than $14 billion in five funds and has invested in approximately 70 companies. In addition to private equity investments, Blackstone's core businesses include real estate investments, corporate debt investments, asset management, merger and acquisition advisory services, and restructuring and reorganization advisory services.



THE RECENT RESTRUCTURING

        In October—November 2004, we completed an internal restructuring pursuant to which the Purchaser effected, by giving a corresponding instruction under the Domination Agreement, the transfer of all of the shares of CAC from Celanese Holding GmbH, a wholly owned subsidiary of Celanese AG, to BCP Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A. ("BCP Caylux") which resulted in BCP Caylux owning 100% of the equity of CAC and, indirectly, all of its assets, including subsidiary stock.

        Following the transfer of CAC to BCP Caylux, (1) BCP Crystal Holdings Ltd. 2 contributed substantially all of its assets and liabilities (including all outstanding capital stock of BCP Caylux) to BCP Crystal, in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of BCP Crystal; (2) BCP Crystal assumed substantially all obligations of BCP Caylux, including all rights and obligations of BCP Caylux under the senior credit facilities, the floating rate term loan and the senior subordinated notes; (3) BCP Caylux transferred certain assets, including its equity ownership interest in CAC, to BCP Crystal; (4) BCP Crystal Holdings Ltd. 2 was reorganized as a Delaware limited liability company and changed its name to Celanese Holdings LLC (such reorganized entity, "Celanese Holdings"); and (5) Blackstone Crystal Holdings Capital Partners (Cayman) IV Ltd. was reorganized as a Delaware corporation and changed its name to Celanese Corporation. BCP Crystal, at its discretion, may subsequently cause the liquidation of BCP Caylux.

        As a result of these transactions, BCP Crystal holds 100% of CAC's equity and, indirectly, all equity owned by CAC in its subsidiaries. In addition, BCP Crystal holds, indirectly, all of the Celanese Shares held by the Purchaser.

Corporate Structure

        The charts below summarize our ownership structure immediately before completion of the Recent Restructuring and our current ownership structure.


Pre-Restructuring Structure

FLOWCHART

Footnotes on page 4849


Current Structure

FLOWCHART

Footnotes on following page



(1)
In September 2004, Crystal US Holdings 3 L.L.C. ("Crystal LLC") and Crystal US Sub 3 Corp., a subsidiary of Crystal LLC, issued and sold $853 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of their Senior Discount Notes due 2014. Until October 1, 2009, interest on the senior discount notes will accrue in the form of an increase in the accreted value of such notes. We expect to use approximately $207 million of the net proceeds from the offering of our Series A common stock to redeem a portion of the senior discount notes. See "Description of Indebtedness—Senior Discount Notes due 2014."

(2)
The senior credit facilities provide financing of up to approximately $1.2 billion, consisting of (1) a $611 million term loan facility with a maturity of seven years; (2) a $228 million credit-linked revolving facility with a maturity of five years; and (3) a $380 million revolving credit facility with a maturity of five years. Celanese Americas Corporation ("CAC") may borrow under both revolving credit facilities. We expect to use borrowings under the new senior credit facilities, together with any remaining proceeds from the offering of our Series A common stock to repay all amounts outstanding under the senior credit facilities. See "Description of Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facilities."

(3)
In June 2004, BCP Caylux borrowed $350 million under a floating rate term loan due 2014. We expect to use borrowings under the new senior credit facilities, together with any remaining proceeds from the offering of our Series A common stock to repay all amounts outstanding under the floating rate term loan. See "Description of Indebtedness—Floating Rate Term Loan."

(4)
In June and July 2004, BCP Caylux issued and sold $1,225 million aggregate principal amount of its 95/8% U.S. Dollar-denominated Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 and €200 million principal amount of its 103/8% Euro-denominated Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014. We expect to use approximately $566 million of the net proceeds from the offering of our Series A common stock to redeem a portion of the senior subordinated notes. See "Description of Indebtedness—Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014."


USE OF PROCEEDS

        We estimate that the net proceeds from the offering of our Series A common stock, after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses, will be approximately $949 million. We estimate that the net proceeds from the offering of our preferred stock, after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses, will be approximately $194 million.

        We intend to contribute $773 million of the net proceeds from the offering of our Series A common stock to our subsidiary, Crystal LLC, which will use approximately $207 million of such net proceeds to redeem a portion of its senior discount notes. Crystal LLC will contribute the remaining proceeds to its subsidiary, Celanese Holdings, which in turn will contribute it to its subsidiary, BCP Crystal. BCP Crystal will use such proceeds to redeem a portion of its senior subordinated notes. BCP Crystal will use borrowings of approximately $1,556 million under the new senior credit facilities that it expects to enter into prior to the consummation of the Series A common stock offering to repay the amounts outstanding under the existing senior credit facilities and the floating rate term loan and to pay a $582 million dividend to Celanese Holdings, which in turn will distribute this amount to Crystal LLC. Crystal LLC will distribute this amount up to us and we will use it, together with the remaining net proceeds from the offering of our Series A common stock and the net proceeds from the offering of our preferred stock, to pay a dividend of $952 million to the holders of our Series B common stock. The Original Stockholders will be the only holders of our Series B common stock immediately prior to the consummation of this offering. The expected sources and uses of funds used in connection with the Concurrent Financings (assuming a January 2005 closing unless otherwise specified) are set forth in the table below. The actual amounts may vary depending on the time of the closing of this offering.

Sources
(in millions)

Sources
(in millions)

 Uses
(in millions)

Sources
(in millions)

 Uses
(in millions)

Series A Common StockSeries A Common Stock $1,000 Partial Redemption of Senior Discount Notes(2) $207Series A Common Stock $1,000 Partial Redemption of Senior Discount Notes(2) $207
Preferred StockPreferred Stock  200 Partial Redemption of Senior Subordinated   Preferred Stock  200 Partial Redemption of Senior Subordinated   
New Senior Credit Facilities(1)New Senior Credit Facilities(1)  1,556     Notes(3)  566New Senior Credit Facilities(1)  1,556     Notes(3)  566
    Repayment of Existing Senior Credit Facilities(4)  611     Repayment of Existing Senior Credit Facilities(4)  611
    Repayment of Floating Rate Term Loan  350     Repayment of Floating Rate Term Loan  350
    Dividend to holders of our Series B common stock  952     Dividend to Holders of Our Series B Common Stock  952
     Estimated Fees and Expenses(5)  70     Estimated Fees and Expenses(5)  70
 
   
 
   
Total Sources Total Sources $2,756     Total Uses $2,756 Total Sources $2,756     Total Uses $2,756
 
   
 
   

(1)
Sources shown exclude the delayed draw portion of the new senior credit facilities of approximately $442 million that we expect to borrow following the closing of the Series A common stock offering to fund the Acetex and Vinamul Polymers acquisitions. Prior to the consummation of the Series A common stock offering, we expect to enter into the new senior credit facilities with a syndicate of financial institutions. We expect the terms of the new senior credit facilities to be substantially similar to the terms of our existing senior credit facilities described above under "Description of Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facilities."

(2)
Represents redemption of approximately $37 million of Series A senior discount notes and approximately $151 million of Series B senior discount notes ($180 million of combined accreted value at September 30, 2004) and $19 million of premium based on the amounts required at the expected redemption date (in February 2005).

(3)
Represents redemption of $516 million of senior subordinated notes and $50 million of premium.

(4)
Includes additional borrowings made in October 2004 to finance a pension contribution.

(5)
Represents underwriting discounts and fees, bank fees and other fees and expenses.

        We intend to use the net proceeds from any shares of our Series A common stock sold pursuant to the underwriters' over-allotment option to pay an additional cash dividend to the holders of our Series B common stock.

        Any change in the aggregate amount of net proceeds raised in the Series A common stock and preferred stock offerings (assuming net proceeds of at least $773 million are raised) will either increase or decrease the cash dividend to be paid to the holders of our Series B common stock, as the case may be, but will not affect the amount of debt to be redeemed or repaid.redeemed.

        The interest rate and maturity of indebtedness that we intend to discharge using the net proceeds from the offering of our Series A common stock,Concurrent Financings, as well as the use of proceeds from such indebtedness, are described below:

        Senior Discount Notes.    In September 2004, our subsidiaries Crystal US 3 Holdings L.L.C. and Crystal US Sub 3 Corp., issued $853 million aggregate principal amount at maturity ($513 million in gross proceeds) of their Senior Discount Notes due 2014 consisting of $163 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 10% Series A Senior Discount Notes and $690 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of their 101/2% Series B Senior Discount Notes. Prior to October 1, 2009, interest will accrue on the senior discount notes in the form of an increase in their accreted value. Cash interest payments will be due and payable beginning on April 1, 2010.

        Senior Subordinated Notes.    In June and July 2004, BCP Caylux issued $1,225 million aggregate principal amount of 95/8% U.S. Dollar-denominated senior subordinated notes and €200 million principal amount of 103/8% Euro-denominated senior subordinated notes. The senior subordinated notes mature on June 15, 2014.

        Senior Credit Facilities.    In April 2004, BCP Caylux entered into senior credit facilities with a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions led by Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as global coordinator, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as joint lead arrangers, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Bank of America, N.A. and General Electric Capital Corporation, as documentation agents, and Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., The Bank of Nova Scotia, KfW and Commerzbank AG, New York and Cayman Branches, as senior managing agents. The senior credit facilities provide financing of approximately $1.2 billion. The senior credit facilities consist of (1) a term loan facility in the aggregate amount of $456 million and €125 million with a maturity of seven years; (2) a $228 million credit-linked revolving facility with a maturity of five years; and (3) a $380 million revolving credit facility with a maturity of five years.

        In addition, upon the occurrence of certain events, BCP Crystal may request, prior to April 6, 2005, an increase to the existing term loan facility in an amount not to exceed $175 million in the aggregate, subject to receipt of commitments by existing term loan lenders or other financial institutions reasonably acceptable to the administrative agent.

        The borrowings under the senior credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at BCP Crystal's option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the higher of (1) the prime rate of Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and (2) the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1% or (b) a LIBOR rate determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits in the currency of such borrowing for the interest period relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs. The applicable margin for borrowings under the credit-linked revolving facility and the revolving credit facility is 1.50% with respect to base rate borrowings and 2.50% with respect to LIBOR borrowings (in each case subject to a step-down based on a performance test). The applicable margin for borrowings under the term loan facility is 1.50% with respect to base rate borrowings and 2.50% with respect to LIBOR borrowings (in each case subject to a step-down based on a performance test). In addition to paying interest, BCP Crystal is required to pay certain fees.



        Floating Rate Term Loan.    In June 2004, BCP Caylux entered into a $350 million floating rate term loan with Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as global coordinator, and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as joint lead arrangers. BCP Crystal is the borrower under the floating rate term loan. The floating rate term loan has a maturity of seven and one-half years and provides for no amortization of principal. The borrowings under the floating rate term loan bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at BCP Crystal's option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the higher of (1) the prime rate of Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and (2) the federal funds rate plus1/2 of 1% or (b) a LIBOR rate determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits in the currency of such borrowing for the interest period relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs. The applicable margin for borrowings is (a) prior to completion of the Recent Restructuring, 3.25% with respect to base rate borrowings and 4.25% with respect to LIBOR borrowings and (b) after completion of the Recent Restructuring, 2.50% with respect to base rate borrowings and 3.50% with respect to LIBOR borrowings.

        Use of Proceeds From Indebtedness Being Discharged.    The Purchaser used the borrowings under the existing senior credit facilities, together with the borrowings under the senior subordinated bridge loan facilities, and the cash equity investment by the Original Shareholders (which included the proceeds from the issuance of the mandatorily redeemable preferred shares) to acquire Celanese Shares in connection with the Tender Offer, to refinance certain existing debt of Celanese, pre-fund certain pension obligations of Celanese, pre-fund certain contingencies and certain obligations linked to the value of the Celanese Shares, such as the payment of fair cash compensation under the Domination Agreement for the remaining Celanese Shares, and payment obligations related to outstanding stock appreciation rights, stock options and interest payments, provide additional funds for working capital and other general corporate purposes, and pay related fees and expenses.

        BCP Caylux used the proceeds from the offering of the senior subordinated notes, together with available cash and borrowings under the floating rate term loan to repay its two senior subordinated bridge loan facilities, plus accrued interest, to redeem the mandatorily redeemable preferred shares and to pay related fees and expenses. The issuers of the senior discount notes used the net proceeds from the offering to make a return of capital distribution to the Issuer, which in turn made a distribution to the Original Stockholders, and to pay fees and expenses.

        See "The Transactions" and "Description of Indebtedness."



DIVIDEND POLICY

        We intend to declare and pay the following special Series B common stock dividends to holders of our Series B common stock, which will be required by our amended and restated certificate of incorporation we expect to adopt in connection with our recapitalization:

        The Original Stockholders will be the only holders of our Series B common stock immediately prior to the consummation of the offering of our Series A common stock. We expect to declare and pay the cash dividends described above on orin April 2005 and the stock dividend described above shortly after April 7, 2005.the expiration of the underwriters' over-allotment option (assuming that option is not exercised in full). Under the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, we will be obligated to take all actions required or permitted under applicable Delaware law to permit the payment of the special Series B common stock dividends and to declare and pay these dividends to the extent there are funds legally available therefor.

        Upon the completion of the Series A common stock offering, our board of directors currently intends to adopt a policy of declaring, subject to legally available funds, a quarterly cash dividend on each share of our common stock at an annual rate initially equal to 0.1875%approximately 0.75% of the average ofprice per share in the closing sale pricesinitial public offering of our Series A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the last ten trading days of the prior quarter, not to exceed $0.05 per share of common stock per quarter unless our board of directors in its sole discretion determines otherwise, commencing the second quarter of 2005. However, there is no assurance that sufficient cash will be available to pay such dividend.

        Our board of directors may at any time modify or revoke our dividend policy on our Series A common stock.

        Upon the completion of the offering of the preferred stock, we will be required, under the terms of the preferred stock, to pay scheduled quarterly dividends, subject to legally available funds. For so long as the preferred stock remains outstanding, (1) we will not declare, pay or set apart funds for the payment of any dividend or other distribution with respect to any junior stock or parity stock and (2) neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, will, subject to certain exceptions, redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration junior stock or parity stock through a sinking fund or otherwise, in



each case unless we have paid or set apart funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of preferred stock and any parity stock for all preceding dividend periods and except for the special Series B common stock dividends.



        The amounts available to us to pay cash dividends will be restricted by our subsidiaries' debt agreements. Under the terms of the senior credit facilities, neither BCP Crystal nor its subsidiaries may pay dividends or otherwise transfer their assets to us. However, we expect that the terms of the new senior credit facilities will permit the dividends described above. The indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes also limit, but do not prohibit, the ability of BCP Crystal, Crystal LLC and their respective subsidiaries to pay dividends. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

        Under the Domination Agreement, any minority shareholder of Celanese AG who elects not to sell its shares to the Purchaser will be entitled to remain a shareholder of Celanese AG and to receive a gross guaranteed fixed annual payment on their shares (Ausgleich) of €3.27 per Celanese Share less certain corporate taxes to be paid by Celanese AG in lieu of any future dividend. See "The Transactions—Post-Tender Offer Events—Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement."

        Under Delaware law, our board of directors may declare dividends only to the extent of our "surplus" (which is defined as total assets at fair market value minus total liabilities, minimum statutory capital), or if there is no surplus, out of our net profits for the then current and/or immediately preceding fiscal years. The value of a corporation's assets can be measured in a number of ways and may not necessarily equal their book value. The value of our capital may be adjusted from time to time by our board of directors but in no event will be less than the aggregate par value of our issued stock. Our board of directors may base this determination on our financial statements, a fair valuation of our assets or another reasonable method. Our board of directors will seek to assure itself that the statutory requirements will be met before actually declaring dividends. In future periods, our board of directors may seek opinions from outside valuation firms to the effect that our solvency or assets are sufficient to allow payment of dividends, and such opinions may not be forthcoming. If we sought and were not able to obtain such an opinion, we likely would not be able to pay dividends. In addition, pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock, we are prohibited from paying a dividend on our common stock (except for the special Series B common stock dividends) unless all payments due and payable under the preferred stock have been made.



CAPITALIZATION

        The following table sets forth our capitalization as of September 30, 2004 (1) on an actual basis, (2) on an as adjusted basis to reflect the Transactions and the Recent Restructuring and (3) on a further adjusted basis to reflect:

        You should read the information in this table in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and "Selected Historical Financial Data," "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

 
 As of September 30, 2004
 
 
 Actual
 As Adjusted for the
Transactions and Recent
Restructuring(1)

 As Further Adjusted
for the Concurrent Financings

 
 
 (in millions except share data)

 
Cash and cash equivalents(1) $819 $681 $646 
  
 
 
 
Total debt:          
 Senior credit facilities(2):          
  Revolving credit facilities $ $ $ 
  Term loan facility  391  611  1,556 
 Floating rate term loan  350  350   
 Senior subordinated notes(3)  1,479  1,479  961 
 Senior discount notes  513  513  333 
 Assumed debt  367  367  367 
  
 
 
 
  Total debt  3,100  3,320  3,217 
  
 
 
 
Minority interest(4)  402  402  402 
Shareholders' equity:          
 Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, aggregate liquidation preference $200 million, 5,000,000 shares authorized, actual and as adjusted; 100,000,000 shares authorized as further adjusted; no shares outstanding actual and as adjusted; 8,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as further adjusted       
 Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized, actual and as adjusted, 500,000,000 shares authorized as further adjusted; 650,494 shares issued and outstanding, actual and as adjusted, 58,937,909 shares of Series A common stock and 99,737,362 shares of Series B common stock issued and outstanding as further adjusted       
 Additional paid-in capital  143  143  322 
 Accumulated deficit  (196) (196) (371)
 Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss)       
  
 
 
 
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)  (53) (53) (49)
  
 
 
 
Total capitalization $3,449 $3,669 $3,570 
  
 
 
 


(1)
Represents cash available to purchase remaining outstanding Celanese Shares, including any options on Celanese Shares that are exercised, to repay additional existing indebtedness, to pay interest on the notes and to make loans to Celanese and its subsidiaries for working capital and general corporate purposes. Prior to the consummation of the offering, we expect to receive $13 million from the sale of shares to management and we expect to pay (1) a $10 million monitoring fee for 2005, (2) an initial deferred compensation payment of $29 million, and (3) $8 million of retention and other executive bonuses. These amounts are not reflected as adjustments to cash and cash equivalents. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—New Arrangements—Transaction and Monitoring Fee Agreement/Sponsor Services Agreement" and "Management—Stock Incentive Plan", "—Deferred Compensation Plan" and "—Bonus".

(2)
The revolving credit facilities provide for borrowings of up to $608 million. As of December 29, 2004, no amounts have been borrowed and $402 million was available for borrowings under the revolving credit facilities (taking into account letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facilities). On an as adjusted basis for the offering, represents $830 million of available borrowings under our new senior credit facility of which no amounts are planned to be drawn in connection with the offering (this amount excludes delayed draw portion of the new senior credit facilities of approximately $442 million that we expect to borrow following the closing of this offering to fund the Acetex and Vinamul Polymers acquisitions).

(3)
Includes the U.S. dollar equivalent of the euro-denominated notes and, on an actual and as adjusted basis, $6 million premium on the $225 million aggregate principal amount of the notes issued July 1, 2004, and on a further adjusted basis, $4 million premium on the remaining notes after the use of proceeds from the offering as $2 million of the premium will be written-off on a further adjusted basis.

(4)
As of September 30, 2004, we owned approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares then outstanding. While we intend to acquire the remaining outstanding shares, there is no assurance that we will be able to do so. If we acquire more shares, our consolidated balance sheet will reflect lower cash and minority interests and our statements of operations will reflect lower minority interest expense for the percentage of the Celanese Shares that we acquire. For purposes of this pro forma financial information, we have assumed that we do not acquire onlyany of the remaining outstanding Celanese shares beyond the approximately 84% of the outstanding Celanese Shares.Shares that we already own. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information."


DILUTION

        Dilution is the amount by which the offering price paid by the purchasers of the common stock to be sold in the offering of shares of our Series A common stock will exceed the net tangible book value per share of common stock after the offering. The net tangible book value per share presented below is equal to the amount of our total tangible assets (total assets less intangible assets) less total liabilities as of September 30, 2004, divided by the number of shares of our common stock that would have been held by the Original Stockholders had (1) the 153.325569 for one common stock split we expect to effect prior to the consummation of this offering been made and (2) the stock dividend of 7,500,000 shares of our Series A common stock that we expect to issue to the holders of our Series B common stock after the expiration of the underwriters' over-allotment option, assuming no exercise of that option, been made as of September 30, 2004. As of September 30, 2004, we had a net tangible book deficit of $987 million, or ($9.20) per share on the basis described above. On a pro forma basis, after giving effect to:

        Our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2004 would have been a deficit of $1,195 million (excluding $200 million of preferred stock and including $13 million proceeds from the issuance of 1,437,909 shares to certain of our executive officers, key employees and directors), or ($7.53) per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value per share of common stock of $1.67 per share to the Original Stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $27.53 per share to new investors.

        The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share basis:

Assumed initial public offering price per share of Series A common stock    $20.00 
Net tangible book deficit per share at September 30, 2004 $(9.20)   
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors in our common stock  1.67    
  
    
Pro forma net tangible book deficit per share after the offering     (7.53)
     
 
Dilution per share to new investors in the Series A common stock    $27.53 
     
 

        We will reduce the number of shares of Series A common stock that we will issue to the holders of our Series B common stock in the stock dividend described in clause (2) above by the number of shares sold to the underwriters pursuant to their option to purchase additional shares of Series A common stock. We will also pay the holders of our Series B common stock a cash dividend equal to all net proceeds we receive from any such sale to the underwriters. As a result, our pro forma net tangible book value will not be affected by the underwriters' exercise of their over-allotment option in respect of the Series A common stock.


        The following table summarizes, on the same pro forma basis as of September 30, 2004, the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us (including shares that will be issued to the Original Stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of the offering and the stock dividend described in clause (2) above), the total consideration paid to us and the average price per share paid by Original Stockholders and by new investors purchasing shares in this offering:

 
 Shares Purchased
 Total Consideration
  
 
 Average Price
Per Share

 
 Number
 Percent
 Amount
 Percent
Original Stockholders(1) 107,237,362 67%$641,000,000 39%$5.98
Certain Officers 1,437,909 1% 12,941,181 1% 9.00
New investors 50,000,000 32% 1,000,000,000 60% 20.00
  
 
 
 
 
 Total 158,675,271 100%$1,653,941,181 100%$10.42
  
 
 
 
 

(1)
Total consideration and average price per share paid by the Original Stockholders do not give effect to the $500 million distribution made to the Original Stockholders in September 2004 using proceeds from the senior discount notes offering and the $952 million dividend we intend to distribute to the Original Stockholders in connection with the Concurrent Financings. If the table were adjusted to give effect to these payments, the Original Stockholders' total consideration for its shares would be $(811) million, with an average share price of $(7.57) which means that the Original Stockholders, in the aggregate, will have received $811 million more than they originally invested.


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

        The following unaudited pro forma financial information is based on the audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements and other unaudited financial information of Celanese and us appearing elsewhere in this prospectus as adjusted to illustrate the estimated pro forma effects of the Transactions and the Recent Restructuring (including the preliminary application of purchase accounting) and the Concurrent Financings. We are a recently-formed company which does not have, apart from financing the Transactions and the Concurrent Financings, any independent external operations other than through the indirect ownership of the Celanese businesses. As of September 30, 2004, we indirectly owned approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares then outstanding. While we intend to acquire the remaining outstanding shares, there is no assurance that we will be able to do so. If we do acquire more shares, our balance sheet will reflect lower cash and minority interests and our statements of operations will reflect lower minority interest expense for the percentage of Celanese Shares that we acquire. For purposes of this unaudited pro forma financial information, we have assumed that we acquire only approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004. See note (h) to the pro forma balance sheet. The unaudited pro forma financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Celanese and of the Issuer and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, including "Basis of Presentation," "The Transactions," "The Recent Restructuring," "Use of Proceeds" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

        The unaudited pro forma balance sheet gives effect to the Recent Restructuring and the Concurrent Financings as if they had occurred on September 30, 2004. The unaudited pro forma statements of operations data give effect to the Transactions, the Recent Restructuring and the Concurrent Financings, as if they had occurred on January 1, 2003.

        The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. However, as of the date of this prospectus, we have not completed the valuation studies necessary to finalize the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed and the related allocation of purchase price, nor have we identified all of the adjustments that may be necessary to conform Celanese's historical accounting policies to ours.

        The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect any adjustments for the recently announced restructuring of our acetate filament business or the pending acquisitions of Acetex or Vinamul Polymers. See "Recent Developments."

        The unaudited pro forma statements of operations data do not reflect certain one-time charges that we recorded or will record following the closing of the Transactions and the Concurrent Financings. These one-time charges include (1) an approximately $50 million non-cash charge for the manufacturing profit added to inventory under purchase accounting, (2) the $71 million of one-time costs related to the replacement of a portion of the Original Financing which was charged to expense in the six months ended September 30, 2004, (3) $18 million write-off of deferred financing fees and $21 million of prepayment premium associated with the July 2004 redemption of our mandatorily redeemable preferred stock described in "The Transactions" section above, (4) $62 million write-off of deferred financing fees, net of $2 million of premium, and $73 million of prepayment premium associated with the redemption of a portion of our senior discount notes and senior subordinated notes, repayment of our existing floating rate term loan and senior credit facilities with a portion of the proceeds of the Concurrent Financings and (5) $35 million one-time charge related to the termination of the monitoring services by the Advisor.

        The unaudited pro forma financial information is for informational purposes only and is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of operations or financial position that we would have reported had the Transactions been completed as of the dates presented, and should not be taken as representative of our future consolidated results of operations or financial position.



UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

 
 Historical
 Transactions
and Recent
Restructuring
Adjustments

 Concurrent
Financings
Adjustments

 Pro Forma(h)
 
 
 (In millions)

 
Assets             
Cash and cash equivalents $819 $(138)(a)$(35)(c)$646 
Trade receivables, net—third party and affiliates  826      826 
Other receivables  575      575 
Inventories  565      565 
Deferred income taxes  67      67 
Other assets  20    (5)(c) 15 
Assets of discontinued operations  5      5 
  
 
 
 
 
Total current assets  2,877  (138) (40) 2,699 

Investments

 

 

555

 

 


 

 


 

 

555

 
Property, plant and equipment, net  1,948      1,948 
Deferred income taxes  72  17  (b)   89 
Other assets  680  (6)(b) (59)(d) 615 
Intangible assets, net  934  25  (b)   959 
  
 
 
 
 
Total assets $7,066 $(102)$(99)$6,865 
  
 
 
 
 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt—third party and affiliates $127 $2  (a)$10  (e)$139 
Trade payables—third party and affiliates  583      583 
Other current liabilities  798      798 
Deferred income taxes  21      21 
Income taxes payable  201      201 
Liabilities of discontinued operations  12      12 
  
 
 
 
 
Total current liabilities  1,742  2  10  1,754 

Long-term debt

 

 

981

 

 

218

  (a)

 

585

  (e)

 

1,784

 
Senior subordinated notes  1,479    (518)(f) 961 
Senior discount notes  513    (180)(f) 333 
Deferred income taxes  244      244 
Benefit obligations  1,280  (322)(a)(b)   958 
Other liabilities  478      478 
  
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities  6,717  (102) (103) 6,512 
Minority interests  402      402 
Commitment and contingencies(i)         
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)  (53)   4  (g) (49)
  
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit) $7,066 $(102)$(99)$6,865 
  
 
 
 
 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma balance sheet.



NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET

Transactions and Recent Restructuring Adjustments

(a)
Adjustments to cash consist of the following

 
 (in millions)
 
Additional term loan borrowing(1) $220 
Additional pension contribution(2)  (358)
  
 
  $(138)
  
 

(1)
Represents additional borrowing (including $2 million reflected in current) under the term loan facility designated to finance pension contributions and repay Celanese debt. As of September 30, 2004, we had $611 million of term loan availability, including the U.S. dollar equivalent of €125 million and had drawn $391 million.

(2)
As of September 30, 2004, Celanese had contributed $105 million and held an additional $54 million in cash for future contributions to a trust out of the total $463 million expected to be contributed to Celanese pension plans in connection with the acquisition of the Celanese shares. In October 2004, Celanese contributed approximately $300 million to its U.S. pension plans.

(b)
The valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition of less than 100% of the outstanding shares of the acquired business is based on a pro rata allocation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the historical carrying amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of the acquired entity. For purposes of preparing the pro forma financial information, we have prepared preliminary ranges of value and estimated useful lives for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets on a consolidated basis. However, we have not yet been able to finalize the inputs and assumptions used at an individual legal entity basis, and therefore amounts have not been included below for CAC. We expect to finalize the allocation in the fourth quarter of 2004 at which time property, plant and equipment and intangible assets for CAC will be adjusted with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. This adjustment reflects the remaining approximate 16% adjustment to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of CAC as a result of the Recent Restructuring that occurred on October 5, 2004, as follows:

 
 (in millions)
 
Increase in employee benefits and other liabilities $(36)
Increase in deferred tax assets  17 
Decrease in other assets  (6)
Increase in excess of purchase price over current book value of net assets  25 
  
 
  $ 
  
 

We are in the process of finalizing the accounting for the transfer of CAC net assets including the allocation of historical goodwill between CAC and Celanese AG, which will be done on a relative fair value basis. Accordingly, the minority interest amount has not been finalized.

Concurrent Financings Adjustments

(c)
In connection with this offering, Blackstone Management Partners IV L.L.C. (the "Advisor"), an affiliate of the Sponsor has advised us that they intend to terminate the monitoring services provided to us by the Advisor under the Transaction and Monitoring Fee Agreement/Sponsor Services Agreement. We expect to pay a termination fee of $35 million, which we intend to fund

(d)
Reflects the write-off of $64 million of deferred financing costs associated with the debt repaid net of the capitalization of $5 million of deferred financing costs associated with our new senior credit facilities.

(e)
Reflects the borrowings of $1,556 million under our new senior credit facilities and the repayment of $611 million of our existing senior credit facilities and $350 million of our floating rate term loan.

(f)
Reflects the redemption of a portion of our senior discount notes and senior subordinated notes from the proceeds of the offering of our Series A common stock and the $2 million write-off of premium.

(g)
Reflects the changes to shareholders' equity from the proceeds from the Concurrent Financings and the dividend to the holders of our Series B common stock as follows:

 
 (in millions)
 
Gross proceeds from the offering of Series A common stock $1,000 
Gross proceeds from the offering of new preferred stock(1)  200 
Estimated fees and expenses of the offering  (69)
Dividend to the holders of our Series B common stock  (952)
Retained earnings (deficit)(2)  (175)
  
 
  $4 
  
 

(h)
The pro forma balance sheet data assumes that we acquired only approximately 84% of the Celanese shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004. The following supplemental pro forma balance sheet data provides information assuming that we acquire 100% of the Celanese Shares. As of September 30, 2004, we indirectly owned approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares outstanding on that date. In connection with the Domination Agreement, we have offered to acquire the remaining approximately 16% or approximately 8.3 million outstanding Celanese Shares at €41.92 per share, for aggregate consideration of $432 million plus interest. If we acquire

 
 (in millions)
 
Cash paid to acquire minority shares $(432)
Increase in excess of purchase price over current book value of net assets  66 
Increase in employee benefits and other liabilities  (1)
Reduction of minority interests  367 
  
 
  $ 
  
 
(i)
See note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of commitments and contingencies.


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
  
  
  
 
 
 Transactions
and Recent
Restructuring
Adjustments

  
  
 
 
 Three Months
Ended March 31,
2004

 Six Months
Ended
September 30, 2004

 Concurrent
Financings
Adjustments

 Pro Forma
 
 
 (in millions, except per share data)

 
Statement of Operations Data:                
Net sales $1,243 $2,494 $ $ $3,737 
Cost of sales  (1,002) (2,063) 86  (a)   (2,979)
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (137) (278) (7)(a) 8  (e) (414)
Research and development expenses  (23) (45) 1  (a)   (67)
Special charges:                
 Insurance recoveries associated with plumbing cases    1      1 
Other special charges, net  (28) (59) 21  (a)   (66)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)    (2)     (2)
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets  (1) 2      1 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Operating profit  52  50  101  8  211 
Equity in net earnings of affiliates  12  35      47 
Interest expense  (6) (228) 15  (b) 35  (f) (184)
Interest and other income, net  22  8      30 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  80  (135) 116  43  104 
Income tax (provision) benefit  (25) (58) (21)(c) (g) (104)
Minority interests    (2) (15)(d)   (17)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before nonrecurring charges directly attributable to the transactions(h) $55 $(195)$80 $43 $(17)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Series A and Series B Common Share Data(i):                
Earnings (loss) per share             $(0.11)
              
 
Weighted average shares:                
 Series A              106,537,909 
              
 
 Series B              99,737,362 
              
 
 Combined              206,275,271 
              
 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma statement of operations data.



UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

 
 Predecessor
Historical

 Transactions and
Recent
Restructurings
Adjustments

 Concurrent Financings
Adjustments

 Pro Forma
 
 
 (in millions)

 
Statement of Operations Data:             
Net sales $4,603 $ $ $4,603 

Cost of sales

 

 

(3,883

)

 

65

  (a)

 


 

 

(3,818

)
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (510) (22)(a) 10  (e) (522)
Research and development expenses  (89) 1  (a)   (88)
Special charges:             
 Insurance recoveries associated with plumbing cases  107      107 
 Sorbates antitrust matters  (95)     (95)
 Other special charges, net  (17)     (17)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  (4)     (4)
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets  6      6 
  
 
 
 
 
Operating profit (loss)  118  44  10  172 

Equity in net earnings of affiliates

 

 

35

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

35

 
Interest expense  (49) (233)(b) 44(f) (238)
Interest and other income, net  99      99 
  
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interest  203  (189) 54  68 

Income tax (provision) benefit

 

 

(60

)

 


(c)

 


(g)

 

(60

)
Minority interests    (6)(d)   (6)
  
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before nonrecurring charges directly attributable to the transactions(h) $143 $(195)$54 $2 
  
 
 
 
 

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Series A and Series B Common Share Data(i):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(0.03

)
           
 
Weighted average shares:             
 Series A           106,537,909 
           
 
 Series B           99,737,362 
           
 
 Combined           206,275,271 
           
 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma statement of operations data.



NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA

(a)
Reflects the adjustments to operating expenses as follows:

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2004

 
 
 (in millions)

 
Purchase accounting for pensions / OPEB(1) $11 $10 
Impact of additional pension contribution(2)  37  23 
Manufacturing profit included in cost of sales(3)    49 
Depreciation and amortization(4)     
Investment banking fees(5)    18 
Stock option expense(6)  6  1 
Acquisition reserves(7)    3 
Advisor monitoring fee(8)  (10) (3)
  
 
 
Total $44 $101 
  
 
 


        These adjustments are allocated as follows:

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended September 30,
2004

 
 
 (in millions)

 
Cost of sales $65 $86 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (22) (7)
Research and development expenses  1  1 
Other special charges, net    21 
  
 
 
  $44 $101 
  
 
 
(b)
Represents pro forma interest expense resulting from our and our subsidiaries' existing capital structure using an assumed LIBOR rate of 1.59% as follows:

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2004

 
 
 (in millions)

 
Revolving credit facilities(1) $ $ 
Term loan(2)  25  19 
Floating rate term loan(3)  18  13 
Senior subordinated notes—dollar tranche(4)  118  89 
Senior subordinated notes—euro tranche(5)  26  20 
Assumed debt(6)  19  17 
Commitment and facility fees(7)  9  6 
  
 
 
Total cash interest expense  215  164 
Senior discount notes(8)  55  45 
Amortization of capitalized debt issuance costs(9)  13  10 
Amortization of premium on notes(10)  (1)  
  
 
 
Total pro forma interest expense  282  219 
Less historical interest expense  (49) (234)
  
 
 
Net adjustment to interest expense $233 $(15)
  
 
 


        A 1/8% change in interest rates would have the following effect on pro forma interest expense:

 
 Year Ended December 31, 2003
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
 
 (in millions)

Term loan $0.8 $0.6
Floating rate term loan  0.4  0.3
  
 
Total $1.2 $0.9
  
 
(c)
Reflects the tax effect of the pro forma adjustments calculated at a 40% statutory rate on non-U.S. items. The U.S. portion of the pro forma adjustments (including interest expense) does not reflect any tax effects as a result of a 100% valuation allowance on the net U.S. deferred tax assets. See note 15 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

(d)
Reflects minority interest in the earnings of Celanese assuming we do not acquire more than the approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004 that we already own. If we do acquire more shares, minority interest expense will be lower for the percentage of Celanese Shares that we acquire. See note (h) to the pro forma balance sheet.

Concurrent Financings Adjustments

(e)
Reflects the impact of the termination of monitoring services (see note (c) to the Unaudited Pro forma Balance Sheet).

(f)
Reflects the reduction in interest expense as a result of the repayment of our existing senior credit facilities and the floating rate term loan and the redemption of a portion of the senior

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2004

 
 
 (in millions)

 
New revolving credit facilities(1) $ $ 
New term loan(2)  79  59 
Senior subordinated notes—dollar tranche(3)  77  58 
Senior subordinated notes—euro tranche(4)  17  13 
Assumed debt(5)  19  17 
Commitment and facility fees(6)  9  7 
  
 
 
Total cash interest expense  201  154 
Senior discount notes(7)  34  28 
Amortization of capitalized debt issuance costs(8)  3  2 
Amortization of premium on notes(9)     
  
 
 
Total pro forma interest expense  238  184 
Less pro forma interest expense for the Transactions (note (b))  (282) (219)
  
 
 
Net adjustment to interest expense $(44)$(35)
  
 
 


        A 1/8% change in interest rates would have the following effect on pro forma interest expense:

 
 Year Ended December 31, 2003
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
 
 (in millions)

Term Loan $1.9 $1.4
  
 
(g)
Reflects the tax effect of the pro forma adjustments calculated at a 40% statutory rate on non-U.S. items. The U.S. portion of the pro forma adjustments (including interest expense) does not reflect any tax effects as a result of a 100% valuation allowance on the net U.S. deferred tax assets. See note 15 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

(h)
The pro forma statement of operations data does not reflect (1) a $49 million ($29 million after tax) one-time non-cash charge to cost of sales that was incurred as the inventory (to which capitalized manufacturing profit was added under purchase accounting) was sold in the first quarter after closing of the Transactions, (2) the $71 million accelerated write-off of the deferred financing costs associated with the senior subordinated bridge loan facilities repaid with the proceeds from the senior subordinated notes, (3) the $21 million of redemption premium and $18 million write-off of deferred financing costs associated with the repayment of the mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, (4) $73 million of redemption premium, and $62 million accelerated write-off of deferred financing fees, net of $2 million of premium, associated with the senior discount notes and senior subordinated notes redeemed with the proceeds of the offering of our Series A common stock, the repayment of our floating rate term loan and the existing senior credit facilities, and (5) $5 million write-off of prepaid expense and a $35 million one-time charge to terminate the monitoring services of the Advisor.
(i)
Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing earnings (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Earnings (loss) available to common stockholders is computed by deducting preferred stock dividends from net earnings (loss). Pro forma diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing earnings (loss) available to common stockholders by the sum of weighted average common shares outstanding plus dilutive common shares for the period. As both series of our common stock will share equally in future undistributed earnings and losses, we report only combined earnings (loss) per share.

 
 Pro forma Year Ended
December 31, 2003

 Pro forma Nine
Months Ended
Sept 30, 2004

 
 
 (In millions, except share and per share amounts)

 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $2 $(17)
Less: Preferred dividends assuming a 4% dividend rate  (8) (6)
  
 
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations allocable to common stockholders $(6)$(23)
  
 
 

Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per Series A and Series B common share(1)

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.11

)
  
 
 

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Series A  106,537,909  106,537,909 
  
 
 
 Series B  99,737,362  99,737,362 
  
 
 
 Combined  206,275,271  206,275,271 
  
 
 

Antidilutive shares(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Series A employee stock options  12,311,718  12,311,718 
  
 
 
 Preferred stock  8,333,333  8,333,333 
  
 
 


Shares outstanding 650,494
Stock split 153.325569
  
Series B common shares 99,737,362
  
Shares issued in the offering of Series A common stock 50,000,000
Shares issued to certain executive officers, key employees
and directors
 1,437,909
Additional shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment option 7,500,000
  
Series A common shares 58,937,909
Shares required to generate proceeds to replace capital being withdrawn (at an assumed offering price of $20.00) 47,600,000
  
Total Series A shares for earnings (loss) per share 106,537,909
  
Total Series A and Series B for earnings (loss) per share 206,275,271
  


SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA

        The balance sheet data shown below for 2002 and 2003, and the statements of operations and cash flow data for 2001, 2002 and 2003, all of which are set forth below, are derived from the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and the notes thereto. The statement of operations data for 1999 and 2000 and the balance sheet data for 1999 through 2001, all of which are set forth below, are unaudited and have been derived from, and translated into U.S. Dollars based on, Celanese's historical euro audited financial statements and the underlying accounting records.

        The summary historical financial data for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003 have been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Celanese, which have been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited consolidated financial statements of Celanese as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. The summary historical financial data as of and for the six months ended September 30, 2004 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial information. In the opinion of management, such unaudited financial data reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for those periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any future period. The unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2004, the six months ended September 30, 2004 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 is included elsewhere in this prospectus. This prospectus presents the financial information relating to Celanese under the caption "Predecessor" and the information relating to the Issuer under the caption "Successor."

        As of the date of this prospectus, the Purchaser, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Issuer, owns approximately 84% of the outstanding Celanese Shares. The Issuer is a recently formed company which, apart from the financing of the Transactions, does not have any independent external operations other than through the indirect ownership of the Celanese businesses. Accordingly, financial and other information of Celanese is presented in this prospectus for periods through March 31, 2004 and our financial and other information is presented as of and for the six months ended September 30, 2004.


 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
  
 Six Months Ended September 30, 2004
 
 
 Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
 
 
 1999(1)
 2000
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (unaudited)

  
  
  
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 
 
 (in millions, except for share and per share data)

 
Statement of Operations Data:                         
Net sales $3,957 $4,120 $3,970 $3,836 $4,603 $3,448 $1,243 $2,494 
Cost of sales  (3,276) (3,403) (3,409) (3,171) (3,883) (2,881) (1,002) (2,063)
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (579) (497) (489) (446) (510) (384) (137) (278)
Research and development expenses  (68) (75) (74) (65) (89) (66) (23) (45)
Special charges(2):                         
 Insurance recoveries associated with plumbing cases  (140) 18  28    107  106    1 
 Sorbates antitrust matters  (79)       (95) (95)    
 Restructuring, impairment and other special charges, net  (353) (36) (444) 5  (17) (2) (28) (59)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  (13) 5  1  3  (4) (3)   (2)
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets  3  1    11  6  5  (1) 2 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating profit (loss)  (548) 133  (417) 173  118  128  52  50 
Equity in net earnings of affiliates  7  18  12  21  35  29  12  35 
Interest expense  (115) (68) (72) (55) (49) (36) (6) (228)
Interest and other income (expense), net(3)  9  102  58  45  99  85  22  8 
Income tax benefit (provision)  95  (100) 106  (61) (60) (68) (25) (58)
Minority interests  7              (2)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  (545) 85  (313) 123  143  138  55  (195)
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  321  1  (52) 27  6  (7) 23  (1)
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, net of income tax        18  (1) (1)    
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss) $(224)$86 $(365)$168 $148 $130 $78 $(196)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share(4)                         
Earnings (loss) per common share—basic and diluted:                         
 Continuing operations                      $(1.96)
                       
 
 Discontinued operations                      $(0.01)
                       
 
 Net earnings (loss)                      $(1.97)
                       
 
Weighted average shares—basic and diluted                       99,737,362 
                       
 

 
 Predecessor
  
 
 
 Successor
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2003

 Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
 Six Months Ended
September 30, 2004

 
 
 1999(1)
 2000
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (unaudited)

  
  
  
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 
 
 (in millions, except for share and per share data)

 
Other Financial Data:                         
EBITDA (unaudited)(5)  N/A  N/A $(42)$468 $502 $420 $153 $226 
Unusual items included in EBITDA (unaudited)(6)  N/A  N/A  440  16  113  32  37  117 
Other non-cash charges (income) included in EBITDA (unaudited)(7)  N/A  N/A  21  97  24  17  13  37 
Depreciation and amortization  306  308  326  247  294  213  72  150 
Capital expenditures  254  185  191  203  211  133  44  106 
Dividends paid per share(8)   $0.10 $0.35   $0.48       

Statement of Cash Flows Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations:                         
Operating activities  N/A  N/A $462 $363 $401 $231 $(107)$109 
Investing activities  N/A  N/A  (105) (139) (275) (178) 96  (1,724)
Financing activities  N/A  N/A  (337) (150) (108) (135) (43) 2,448 

Balance Sheet Data (at the end of period) (1999, 2000, and 2001 unaudited):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Trade working capital(9) $N/A $N/A $499 $599 $641    $715 $808 
Total assets  7,821  7,138  6,232  6,417  6,814     6,613  7,066 
Total debt  952  1,084  775  644  637     587  3,100 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock(10)                 
Shareholders' equity  2,875  2,671  1,954  2,096  2,582     2,622  (53)

(1)
The consolidated financial statements of Celanese for the period prior to the effective date of the demerger from Hoechst assume that Celanese had existed as a separate legal entity with four business segments, Chemical Products, Acetate Products, Technical Polymers Ticona and Performance Products, as well as the other businesses and activities of Hoechst transferred to Celanese in the demerger. The financial results of Celanese in 1999 prior to the effective date of the demerger have been carved out from the consolidated financial statements of Hoechst using the historical results of operations and assets and liabilities of these businesses and activities and reflect the accounting policies adopted by Hoechst in the preparation of its financial statements and thus do not necessarily reflect the accounting policies which Celanese might have adopted had it been an independent company during that period.

(2)
Special charges include impairment charges, provisions for restructuring, which include costs associated with employee termination benefits and plant and office closures certain insurance recoveries, and other expenses and income incurred outside the normal course of ongoing operations. See note 25 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 14 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3)
Interest and other income, net, includes interest income, dividends from cost basis investments and other non-operating income (expense).

(4)
Earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding after giving effect to the 153.325569 for one stock split. Net earnings (loss) per share is not applicable for the historical Predecessor periods as there were no shares outstanding during those periods.

(5)
EBITDA, a measure used by management to measure performance, is defined as earnings (loss) from continuing operations, plus interest expense net of interest income, income taxes and depreciation and amortization. Our management believes EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry. See "Special Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures." EBITDA is not a recognized term under GAAP and does not purport to be an alternative to net earnings as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

 
 Predecessor
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
 Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
 Successor
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
 
 
 Six Months
Ended September 30,
2004

 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions)

 
Net earnings (loss) $(365)$168 $148 $130 $78 $(196)
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  52  (27) (6) 7  (23) 1 
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles    (18) 1  1     
Interest expense  72  55  49  36  6  228 
Interest income  (21) (18) (44) (35) (5) (15)
Income tax (benefit) provision  (106) 61  60  68  25  58 
Depreciation and amortization  326  247  294  213  72  150 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
EBITDA $(42)$468 $502 $420 $153 $226 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
(6)
EBITDA, as defined above, was (increased) reduced by the following unusual items, each of which is further discussed below (unaudited):

 
 Predecessor
  
 
  
  
  
  
 Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
 Successor
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
 
 Six Months
Ended September 30,
2004

 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 (in millions)

Stock appreciation rights (income) expense(a) $10 $3 $59 $41 $ $1
Special charges(b)  416  (5) 5  (9) 28  58
Other restructuring charges(c)      26  8  10  13
Other (income) expenses(d)  9  12  5  (17) (3) 31
Other unusual items(e)  5  6  18  9  2  14
  
 
 
 
 
 
  $440 $16 $113 $32 $37 $117
  
 
 
 
 
 

(7)
EBITDA, as defined above, was also (increased) reduced by the following other non-cash items, each of which is further discussed below (unaudited):


 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions)

 
Amortization included in pension and OPEB expense(a) $10 $15 $28 $19 $8 $2 
Adjustment to equity earnings(b)  11  79  (12) (8) 4  (15)
Other non-cash charges (income)(c)    3  8  6  1   
Purchase accounting for inventories(d)            49 
Minority interests, net of dividends(e)            1 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  $21 $97 $24 $17 $13 $37 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Represents the portion of pension and OPEB expense resulting from amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses, prior service costs and transition obligations. In addition, we expect Celanese's future pension expense to be reduced as a result of the pre-funding of $463 million of pension contributions in connection with the Transactions. Assuming an annual long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.93%, annual pension expense would decrease by an additional $37 million. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information."

(b)
Represents the adjustment to reflect earnings of investments accounted for under the equity method on a cash basis.

(c)
Relates primarily to non-cash expense associated with stock option plans.

(d)
Represents the one-time charge to cost of sales resulting from purchase accounting for inventories

(e)
Represents minority interest expense relating to the approximately 16% of the Celanese Shares outstanding at September 30, 2004 that we did not own, net of actual dividends paid during the period. See note (7).

(8)
In the six months ended September 30, 2004, Celanese declared and paid a dividend of €0.12 ($0.14) per share for the year ended December 31, 2003. See "The Transactions" for information on future dividends that may be required under German law to be paid by Celanese to its minority shareholders.

(9)
Trade working capital is defined as trade accounts receivable from third parties and affiliates net of allowance for doubtful accounts, plus inventories, less trade accounts payable to third parties and affiliates. Trade working capital is calculated in the table below (unaudited):

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 
 
 December 31,
  
  
 
 
 March 31,
2004

 September 30,
2004

 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions)

 
Trade receivables, net $536 $666 $722 $798 $826 
Inventories  483  505  509  516  565 
Trade payables  (520) (572) (590) (599) (583)
  
 
 
 
 
 
  $499 $599 $641 $715 $808 
  
 
 
 
 
 
(10)
Our mandatorily redeemable preferred stock was repaid with the proceeds of the offering of the senior subordinated notes that occurred on July 1, 2004.


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations covers periods prior and subsequent to the Transactions. Accordingly, except for the effect of the pro forma adjustments or unless otherwise noted, the discussion and analysis of historical periods do not reflect the significant impact that the Transactions have had and will have on the Issuer, including increased leverage and liquidity requirements. In addition, the statements in the discussion and analysis regarding industry outlook, expectations regarding the performance of Celanese's business and the other non-historical statements in the discussion and analysis are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in "Risk Factors." Actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with the sections entitled "Risk Factors," "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information," "Selected Historical Financial Data" and the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto which were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

        The results as of September 30, 2004 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the six months ended September 30, 2004 have not been audited and should not be taken as an indication of the results of operations to be reported for any subsequent period or for the full fiscal year. The unaudited pro forma results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 give effect to the Transactions, the Recent Restructuring and the Concurrent Financings (collectively the "pro forma adjustments"), as if they had occurred on January 1, 2003. The unaudited pro forma results of operations should be read in conjunction with "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information" appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

Basis of Presentation

        On April 6, 2004, pursuant to the Tender Offer, the Purchaser, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Issuer, acquired approximately 84% of the Celanese Shares then outstanding. The ordinary shares were acquired at a price of €32.50 per share or an aggregate purchase price of $1,693 million, including direct acquisition costs of approximately $69 million.

        In addition, as part of the Tender Offer, the Purchaser agreed to refinance certain existing debt of Celanese, pre-fund pension obligations of Celanese, pre-fund certain contingencies and certain obligations linked to the value of the Celanese Shares, such as the payment of fair cash compensation under the Domination Agreement for the remaining outstanding shares of Celanese and payment obligations related to outstanding stock appreciation rights, stock options and interest payments, provide additional funds for working capital and other general corporate purposes, and pay related fees and expenses.

        The funds used in connection with the Transactions were provided by equity investments from the Original Stockholders; term loans of approximately $608 million ($611 million at September 30, 2004 exchange rates) and senior subordinated bridge loan facilities of $1,565 million. The senior subordinated bridge loan facilities have since been refinanced by the senior subordinated notes and the floating rate term loan. As a result of the financing, our interest expense currently is, and will continue to be, higher than it was prior to the Transactions.

        We accounted for the acquisition of Celanese using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the acquisition of Celanese resulted in a new basis of accounting. The purchase price was preliminarily allocated based on current estimates of the fair value of the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed and we expect to make further adjustments to the preliminary allocations in the fourth quarter of 2004. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are reflected at fair value for the approximately 84% portion acquired and at historical basis for the remaining approximate 16%. The



excess of the total purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired at closing has been allocated to goodwill, and this indefinite lived asset is subject to annual impairment review. Goodwill in the transaction, based on the preliminary allocation of the purchase price, totaled $528 million. (see note 3 in the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements).

        In conjunction with the acquisition, we began formulating a plan to exit or restructure certain activities. We have not completed this analysis, but have recorded initial liabilities as of September 30, 2004 of $17 million, primarily for employee severance and related costs in connection with a preliminary plan as well as approving the continuation of all existing Celanese restructuring and exit plans. As we finalize our plans to exit or restructure activities, we may record additional liabilities for, among other things, severance and severance related costs, which would also increase the goodwill recorded.

        Successor—Represents the Issuer's unaudited consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2004 and its unaudited consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended September 30, 2004. These consolidated financial statements reflect the preliminary application of purchase accounting, described above, relating to the Transactions.

        Predecessor—Represents Celanese's audited consolidated financial position as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003 and the unaudited consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003. These consolidated financial statements relate to periods prior to the Transactions and present Celanese's historical basis of accounting without the application of purchase accounting related to the acquisition of Celanese.

        In the fourth quarter of 2003, Celanese realigned its business segments to reflect a change of how Celanese manages the business and assesses performance. This change resulted from recent transactions, including divestitures and the formation of a joint venture. A new segment, Chemical Products, has been introduced and consists primarily of the former Acetyl Products and Chemical Intermediates segments. In addition, legacy pension and other postretirement benefit costs associated with previously divested Hoechst businesses are reflected as part of Other Activities. Historically, these costs were allocated to the business segments. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

        Although we have not completed the financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2004, we expect to incur certain significant charges in the fourth quarter (or the first quarter of 2005), including (all figures are based on preliminary estimates):


        Our results in the fourth quarter of 2004 could also be affected by other adjustments we may record that would impact our goodwill as well as our current and deferred provision for taxes. In particular,

        We are in the process of obtaining our final valuation reports related to our benefit plans, which may result in an adjustment to our additional minimum liability, a component of other comprehensive income and shareholders' equity, the amount of which is not yet determinable.

        The foregoing is not intended to be a complete list of the charges and other items that could have an effect on our results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2004. We may identify additional adjustments in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2004. These additional adjustments may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004.

Prior to the consummation of the offering, we expect to receive $13 million from the sale of shares to certain of our executive officers, key employees and directors and we expect to pay (1) a $10 million monitoring fee for 2005, (2) a $35 million fee for the termination of the monitoring services, (3) an initial deferred compensation payment of $29 million, and (4) $8 million of retention and other executive bonuses. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—New Arrangements—Transaction and Monitoring Fee Agreement / Sponsor Services Agreement" and "Management—Stock Incentive Plan", "—Deferred Compensation Plan" and "—Bonus".

        In December 2004, we adopted a stock incentive plan designed to assist the company in recruiting and retaining key employees, directors or consultants and a deferred compensation plan for certain of our executive officers and key employees. See "Management—Stock Incentive Plan" and "Management—Deferred Compensation Plan." Under the Stock Incentive Plan, we expect to grant options with the exercise price equal to the initial public offering price of the Series A common stock. We expect certain of our executive officers, key employees and directors to purchase Series A common



stock at the offering price of the Series A common stock. In addition, we expect to sell shares of our Series A common stock for a price below the initial public offering price of the Series A common stock under our Stock Incentive Plan. In connection with such issuance, we expect to record a compensation expense equal to the difference between the issue price and the initial public offering price times the number of shares issued below the initial public offering price, in the aggregate amount of approximately $16 million.

        The aggregate maximum amount payable under the deferred compensation plan is $243 million.million (based on an assumed initial public offering price of $20.00 per share of Series A common stock). The



initial component of the deferred compensation plan totaling an aggregate of approximately $29 million vested in the fourth quarter of 2004 and will be paid in the first quarter of 2005. The remaining aggregate maximum amount payable of $214 million is subject to downward adjustment if the price of our Series A common stock falls below the initial public offering price and vests subject to both (1) continued employment or the achievement of certain performance criteria and (2) the disposition by the Sponsor of at least 90% of its equity interest in us with at least a 25% cash internal rate of return on their equity interest. See "Management—Deferred Compensation Plan."

        We expect to record a charge in the fourth quarter of 2004 for the first $29 million of the deferred compensation plan. We have not recorded any liabilities or accrued any expenses related to the remaining unvested portion of this deferred compensation amount. Instead, a one-time charge will be taken at the time both vesting criteria are met. We may pay less than the aggregate maximum amount if our share price falls below the initial public offering price and if the participants in the deferred compensation plan do not remain employed when vesting conditions are met.

        We expect to incur expenses of an aggregate of approximately $10-15 million in the fourth quarter of 2004 and in 2005 in connection with our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder.

Major Events In 2004

        During the second quarter of 2004, Celanese changed its inventory valuation method of accounting for its U.S. subsidiaries from last-in first-out ("LIFO") to first-in first-out ("FIFO"). This change will more closely represent the physical flow of goods resulting in ending inventory which will better represent the current cost of the inventory and the costs in income will more closely match the flow of goods. The FIFO method is now used to determine cost for all inventories of Celanese except for stores and supplies, which are generally valued using the average cost method. Information throughout this prospectus has been restated for all periods presented to reflect this change.

        In response to greater demand for Ticona's technical polymers, Celanese announced two projects to expand manufacturing capacity. Ticona plans to increase production of polyacetal in North America by about 20%, raising total capacity to 102,000 tons per year at our Bishop, Texas, facility by the end of 2004. Fortron Industries, a joint venture of Ticona and Kureha Chemicals Industries, plans to increase the capacity of its Fortron polyphenylene sulfide plant in Wilmington, North Carolina, by 25% by the end of 2005.

        In October-November 2004, we completed an organizational restructuring. See "The Recent Restructuring."

        In October 2004, we announced plans to consolidate our acetate tow production by 2007 and to discontinue the production of acetate filament by mid-2005. The restructuring is being implemented to increase efficiency, reduce overcapacity and to focus on products and markets that provide long-term value.

        In October, 2004 we agreed to acquire Acetex Corporation, a Canadian corporation, for approximately $261 million and the assumption by us of debt owed by Acetex, valued at approximately $231 million. Acetex has two primary businesses: the Acetyls Business and the Specialty Polymers and Films Business. The Acetyls business produces acetic acid, polyvinyl alcohol and vinyl acetate monomer. The Specialty Polymers and Films Business produces specialty polymers (used in the manufacture of a variety of plastics products, including packaging and laminating products, auto parts, adhesives and medical products) as well as products for the agricultural, horticultural and construction industries. Acetex will be operated as part of our chemicals business. Closing of the acquisition is conditioned



upon Acetex shareholder approval, regulatory approvals and other customary conditions. We expect to finance this acquisition through borrowings under the new senior credit facilities.



        In November 2004, we announced our plans to purchase Vinamul Polymers, the North American and European emulsion polymer business of National Starch and Chemical Company ("NSC"), for $208 million, subject to regulatory approvals and other customary conditions. NSC is a subsidiary of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC ("ICI"). Emulsion polymers enhance the performance of adhesives, paints and coatings, textiles, paper, building products and other goods. The acquisition is expected to be financed through an amendment and expansion of the senior credit facilities.

        In December 2004, we approved a plan to dispose of the Cyclo-olefin Copolymer ("COC") business included within the Technical Polymers Ticona segment and our interest in Pemeas GmbH, the fuel cell joint venture included in Other Activities. As a result of this decision, we expect to record an impairment loss in the three month period ended December 31, 2004, the amount of which has not yet been determined. The operating loss for COC was $(35) million for the year ended December 31, 2003, $(9) million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and $(18) million for the six months ended September 30, 2004. The operating loss for the fuel cell business was $(12) million for the year ended December 31, 2003, $(3) million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and $(4) million for the six months ended September 30, 2004.

Major Events In 2003

        In 2003, Celanese took major steps to enhance the value of its businesses, invest in new production capacity in growth areas, reduce costs and increase productivity.





Major Events In 2002


Financial Highlights

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 Pro forma
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
  
  
  
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 
 
 (in millions)

 
Statement of Operations Data:                      
 Net sales $3,970 $3,836 $4,603 $3,448 $1,243 $2,494 $3,737 
 Cost of sales  (3,409) (3,171) (3,883) (2,881) (1,002) (2,063) (2,979)
 Special charges  (416) 5  (5) 9  (28) (58) (65)
 Operating profit (loss)  (417) 173  118  128  52  50  211 
 Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  (419) 184  203  206  80  (135) 104 
 Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  (313) 123  143  138  55  (195) (19)
 Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  (52) 27  6  (7) 23  (1)  
 Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles    18  (1) (1)      
 Net earnings (loss)  (365) 168  148  130  78  (196) (17)
 
 Predecessor
  
 
 Successor
 
 As of December 31,
 
 As of
September 30,
2004

 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 (unaudited)

  
  
 (unaudited)

 
 (in millions)

Other Balance Sheet Data:            
 Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt—third party and affiliates $235 $204 $148 $127
 Plus: Long-term debt  540  440  489  2,973
  
 
 
 
 Total debt  775  644  637  3,100
 Less: Cash and cash equivalents  43  124  148  819
  
 
 
 
 Net debt $732 $520 $489 $2,281
  
 
 
 
 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 Pro forma
 
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
  
  
  
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Other Data:                      
 Depreciation and amortization $326 $247 $294 $213 $72 $150 $222 
 Operating margin(1)  (10.5)% 4.5% 2.6% 3.7% 4.2% 2.0% 5.6%
 Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interest as a percentage of net sales  (10.6)% 4.8% 4.4% 6.0% 6.4% (5.4)% 2.8%

(1)
Defined as operating profit (loss) divided by net sales.

Short period discussions on an actual basis—For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and the Six Months Ended September 30, 2004

        As a result of the Transactions, our actual results of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2004 are reported on a different basis after applying the purchase method of accounting and thus are not comparable to previous periods of the Predecessor, which were based on Celanese's historical cost. The following is a discussion of the results of operations of the Predecessor for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and of the Successor for the six months ended September 30, 2004 on an actual basis.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Predecessor generated net sales of $1,243 million, with cost of sales of $1,002 million or 80.6% of net sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $137 million or 11.0% of net sales. Research and development expenses were $23 million or 1.9% of net sales. Special charges were $28 million, comprised primarily of expenses for advisory services related to the Tender Offer. Operating profit was $52 million or 4.2% of net sales, which included amortization of intangible assets of $2 million and depreciation of $69 million. Income tax expense was $25 million with net earnings of $78 million.

        For the six months ended September 30, 2004, the Successor generated net sales of $2,494 million, with cost of sales of $2,063 million or 82.7% of net sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $278 million or 11.1% of net sales. Research and development expenses were $45 million or 1.8% of net sales. Special charges were $58 million, which largely represented asset impairments for the Acetate Products' restructuring. Operating profit was $50 million or 2.0% of net sales and included amortization of intangible assets of $13 million and depreciation of $133 million. Interest expense was $228 million and income tax expense was $58 million. Net loss for the period was $196 million. Included in cost of sales for the six months ended September 30, 2004 is a $49 million non-cash charge for the manufacturing profit added to inventory under purchase accounting which was charged to cost of sales as the inventory was sold in the first quarter after closing. Included in interest expense was the accelerated amortization of $89 million of deferred financing costs resulting from the refinancing of the senior subordinated bridge loan facilities and the redemption of the mandatorily redeemable preferred stock. In addition, included in interest expense was a loss of $21 million on the early redemption of the mandatorily redeemable preferred stock.

Overview—Pro Forma Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003

        All business segments experienced strong volume growth in the first nine months of 2004. The Chemical Products segment benefited from stronger overall demand and a competitor outage in Europe, while the Technical Polymers Ticona segment grew on new commercial applications and stronger demand from the automotive, electrical/electronics, household goods, and medical markets. The performance of Ticona's affiliates also reflected improved business conditions. The overall economic environment, however, remained challenging due to higher raw material and energy costs, as well as some weaker pricing in the Ticona and Performance Products segments compared to the same period last year.

        Pro forma net sales in the first nine months of 2004 rose 8% to $3,737 million compared to net sales as reported for the same period in 2003 mainly on higher volumes in all business segments and favorable currency effects, which were partially offset by changes in the composition of the Chemical Products segment and slightly lower pricing.



        Pro forma operating profit increased by 65% to $211 million compared to the same period last year. Pro forma operating profit benefited from volume increases and $40 million of lower expense for stock appreciation rights, which were partially offset by increased raw material and energy costs, higher special charges and slightly lower pricing. For the first nine months of 2004, pro forma operating profit included lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs resulting from the pro forma adjustments. The lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs were primarily driven by the effects of fair value adjustments associated with the pension and OPEB liabilities resulting from the application of purchase accounting and the pre-funding of pension contributions in connection with the pro forma adjustments.

        Pro forma earnings from continuing operations before tax and minority interests decreased to $104 million from earnings as reported of $206 million in the same period last year mainly due to an increase in pro forma interest expense of $148 million resulting from the higher debt levels and interest rates associated with the pro forma adjustments, which was partially offset by higher operating profit of $83 million.

        Investments in affiliates continued to perform well and contribute to profitability. Pro forma equity in net earnings of affiliates rose by 62% to $47 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period last year. European Oxo GmbH, Celanese's oxo chemicals joint venture is expected to record significant restructuring charges in the fourth quarter of 2004. Accordingly, we expect this will negatively impact our equity in net earnings of affiliates. Dividends from investments accounted for under the cost method increased to $38 million compared to $33 million in the same period in the prior year.

Overview—2003 Compared with 2002

        In a global business environment characterized by higher raw material and energy costs and modest growth, Celanese achieved full year 2003 net earnings of $148 million compared to net earnings of $168 million for 2002. Earnings from continuing operations increased to $143 million in 2003 compared to $123 million in 2002. Earnings from continuing operations excludes the results of the nylon and the majority of the acrylates businesses, which were divested on December 31, 2003 and February 1, 2004, respectively, and are included in earnings (loss) from discontinued operations. Net sales increased to $4.6 billion in 2003 from $3.8 billion in 2002 due to price and volume increases and favorable currency movements.

        Earnings from continuing operations before tax and minority interests increased to $203 million in 2003 compared to $184 million in 2002. This increase was primarily due to higher pricing, particularly in the Chemical Products segment, increased volumes in all segments, cost reductions, productivity improvements and favorable currency movements. Additional favorable adjustments included greater earnings from affiliates, mainly in Asia, increased interest and income from insurance companies and the demutualization of an insurance provider, as well as the addition of the emulsions business acquired at the end of 2002. Also affecting earnings from continuing operations before tax and minority interests was income of $107 million from insurance recoveries and $95 million of expense associated with antitrust matters in the Sorbates industry as discussed below in "Summary of Consolidated Results—2003 Compared with 2002—Special Charges." These increases were mainly offset by higher costs for raw materials and energy and increased expense for stock appreciation rights.



        Significant items affecting earnings from continuing operations before tax and minority interests from 2002 to 2003 were approximately:

(in millions)

  
 
Pricing and volume improvements $240 
Higher costs for raw materials and energy, net of cost reductions and productivity improvements  (180)
Interest and other income from plumbing insurance recoveries  127 
Earnings from affiliates  14 
Sorbates antitrust matters  (95)
Stock appreciation rights expense  (56)

        Although Celanese recorded special charges of only $5 million, special charges significantly affected the operating results of the Technical Polymers Ticona and Performance Products segments in 2003. Ticona's operating profit benefited from income of $107 million from insurance recoveries related to the plumbing cases. The insurance recoveries more than offset special charges related to Ticona's organizational redesign efforts and the closing of a facility in the United Kingdom. The operating profit of the Performance Products' segment was burdened by $95 million in special charges relating to a European Commission decision to fine Hoechst €99 million ($115 million) for antitrust matters in the sorbates industry that occurred prior to the demerger.

        Segment net sales in 2003 increased 21% compared to 2002 due to the inclusion of the emulsions business acquired at year-end 2002 (+8%), favorable currency effects (+5%) and higher pricing (+5%) and volumes (+4%). These increases were partly offset by the transfer of the European oxo business to a joint venture in the fourth quarter 2003 (-1%). Operating profit declined by 32% to $118 million in 2003 compared to $173 million in 2002. This decline reflected increased raw material and energy costs, as well as higher expense for stock appreciation rights and special charges discussed below. These factors outweighed increased pricing in the Chemical Products and Acetate Products segments, higher volumes in all segments, particularly in Technical Polymers Ticona and Performance Products, cost reductions, productivity improvements, increased income from the captive insurance companies and the addition of the emulsions business.

        In the Chemical Products segment, the contribution from the emulsions business, favorable currency movements and cost reductions were outweighed by higher energy costs and an increase in stock appreciation rights expense. Overall in 2003, increased selling prices offset higher raw material costs, although pricing outpaced raw material costs in the first half of the year and lagged in the second half. In Acetate Products, increased pricing and volumes as well as productivity gains only partially offset higher raw material and energy prices. Increased demand led to volume improvements in the Ticona segment on the development of new applications and entry into new markets, partially offset by organizational redesign costs. Volume increases for Performance Products' Sunett sweetener were offset by lower pricing for Sunett and sorbates.

        Celanese reduced its net debt by 6% to $489 million as of December 31, 2003 compared to $520 million as of December 31, 2002. The decrease primarily represents the net repayment of $68 million of debt offset by the addition of $38 million of debt related to the consolidation of a variable interest entity under FIN 46. Trade working capital increased to $641 million at December 31, 2003 from $599 million at December 31, 2002. This increase is primarily related to favorable foreign currency effects as lower payables more than the offset the reduction in inventory resulting from the high levels at the end of 2002, resulting from advance purchases of wood pulp in the Acetate Products segment, a key raw material, caused by the shutdown of a major supplier. Operating cash flow benefited by $180 million relating to the effects of hedging of currency exposure on intercompany funding of operations in U.S. dollars, compared to approximately $95 million in 2002. Benefit



obligations decreased by $106 million to $1,165 million in 2003 from $1,271 million primarily due to an increase in the fair value of plan assets, contributions, payments and a plan amendment related to the U.S. postretirement medical plan. These factors were partially offset by the effects of a decrease in the discount rate.

        In 2003, Celanese took major steps to concentrate on its core businesses. In September, Celanese reached an agreement to sell its acrylates business to Dow. The transaction was completed on February 1, 2004. On October 1, European Oxo GmbH, Celanese's oxo chemicals joint venture with Degussa, began operations. The joint venture is expected to enable the businesses to compete more effectively in an oversupplied industry.

        Celanese streamlined its manufacturing operations and administrative functions, mainly in the Chemical Products and Ticona segments, and, as a result, recorded termination benefit expenses of $26 million in cost of sales, primarily in the fourth quarter 2003. Celanese also continued its use of Six Sigma, a powerful tool to increase efficiency and generate additional revenue.

        During 2003, Ticona started a redesign of its operations. These efforts resulted in special charges of $12 million related to termination benefit expenses.

Overview—2002 Compared with 2001

        In a global business environment characterized by slow and uneven growth, net earnings increased significantly to $168 million in 2002 from a loss of $365 million in the prior year. The increase reflected lower special charges, lower raw material and energy costs, lower amortization expense due to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, savings from restructuring and operational excellence initiatives, improved capacity utilization rates in the Chemical Products segment, and an increase in demand in the Technical Polymers Ticona segment. Additionally, net earnings benefited from a cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles of $18 million, net of income tax, and positive effects from earnings from discontinued operations of $27 million. These effects were partially offset by lower pricing in most segments. Operating cash flow remained strong, though below the prior year's level, as trade working capital increased slightly compared to year-end 2001. 2002 capital expenditures were at similar levels to the previous year.

        Segment sales declined 3% as higher volumes (+2%) and favorable currency effects (+2%) could not offset lower pricing (-7%). Volumes increased in Ticona, on modest demand improvement from the automotive and other end-use industries, especially in Europe. In Performance Products, volumes of Nutrinova's high intensity sweetener, Sunett, continued to grow. In Chemical Products, increased demand and temporarily tight supply conditions during the second half of 2002 led to improved capacity utilization rates. Although overall selling prices were lower year on year in the Chemical Products segment, acetyl pricing rose steadily. Profitability in the Acetate Products segment declined as lower volumes in all products, mainly in filament, offset higher tow pricing and cost savings from restructuring efforts.

        Celanese reduced its net debt by 29% from $732 million as of December 31, 2001 to $520 million as of December 31, 2002. The reduction was due to debt repayment resulting from a continuing high level of cash from operations and net proceeds of $106 million for the net assets of divested businesses and the receipt of $80 million for the repayment of borrowings from a divested business, combined with the effects of currency movements of approximately $190 million. Operating cash flow declined from $462 million in 2001 to $363 million in 2002, as 2001 operating cash flow reflected the benefits of a substantial reduction in trade working capital compared to 2000. Trade working capital in 2002 increased slightly compared to year-end 2001 levels.

        Celanese had capital expenditures of $203 million in 2002, compared to $191 million in 2001. Major projects included the completion of a new 30,000 tons per year plant to produce GUR ultra-high



molecular weight polyethylene in Bishop, Texas. The plant began supplying customers in the fourth quarter of 2002. Celanese also completed the 6,000 tons per year expansion of capacity for Vectra liquid crystal polymers in Shelby, North Carolina. In addition, Celanese began construction in 2002 of a new plant for synthesis gas, an important raw material for the production of oxo and specialty chemicals, at its Oberhausen, Germany site.

        The Focus and Forward restructuring initiatives, started in 2001, generated estimated savings of approximately $95 million in 2002. In connection with these restructuring programs, most of the approximate 1,500 positions identified had been eliminated by December 31, 2002. Celanese's company-wide operational excellence efforts, including Six Sigma, continued to contribute to profitability.

        In 2002, Celanese made further progress in enhancing the value of its portfolio. Celanese acquired the European emulsions and worldwide emulsion powders businesses of Clariant AG, Switzerland in December 2002 valued at $154 million, including the assumption of related liabilities. Net of purchase price adjustments of $2 million and the assumption of liabilities of $21 million, Celanese paid $131 million of cash for the net assets of the business in 2002. In 2003, the purchase price adjustments related to the acquisition were finalized, which resulted in Celanese making an additional payment of $7 million. The acquisition of the emulsion businesses extends Celanese's acetyls value chain into higher value businesses. Additionally, Celanese divested the Trespaphan OPP films business of the Performance Products segment in December 2002 for $214 million, which included $115 million in cash, the repayment of $80 million in intercompany debt that Trespaphan owed Celanese and a purchase price adjustment for liabilities assumed by the buyer of $19 million.

        Celanese took a major step to address performance issues within the former Chemical Intermediates segment in 2002. Celanese signed an agreement with Degussa, Germany to form a 50/50 joint venture for their European oxo activities. In addition, Celanese divested its global allylamines and U.S. alkylamines business at the end of 2002.

Selected Data by Business Segment—Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
  
  
 
 Pro forma
  
 
  
 Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six
Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 Nine Months
Change
in %

 
 (in millions, except percentages, unaudited)

Net Sales              
Chemical Products $2,299 $818 $1,648 $2,466 7
Acetate Products  479  172  349  521 9
Technical Polymers Ticona  574  227  433  660 15
Performance Products  130  44  92  136 5
  
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total $3,482 $1,261 $2,522 $3,783 9
Other Activities  36  11  31  42 17
Intersegment Eliminations  (70) (29) (59) (88)26
  
 
 
 
 
 Total Net Sales $3,448 $1,243 $2,494 $3,737 8
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
  
  
 
 
 Pro forma
  
 
 
  
 Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six
Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 
 
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 Nine Months
Change
in %

 
 
 (in millions, except percentages, unaudited)

 

Special Charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Chemical Products $1 $(1)$(4)$(3)>100 
Acetate Products      (50) (50)n.m. 
Technical Polymers Ticona               
 Plumbing insurance recoveries  106    1  1 (99)
 Restructuring, impairment and other special charges, net  (3) (1) (5) (5)67 
Performance Products               
 Sorbates antitrust matters  (95)      (100)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  9  (2) (58) (57)>100 
Other Activities    (26)   (8)n.m. 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Total Special Charges $9 $(28)$(58)$(65)>100 
  
 
 
 
 
 

Operating Profit (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Chemical Products $123 $65 $119 $220 79 
Acetate Products  10  9  (29) (6)(100)
Technical Polymers Ticona  134  31  26  81 (40)
Performance Products  (55) 11  14  32 >100 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  212  116  130  327 54 
Other Activities  (84) (64) (80) (116)38 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Total Operating Profit $128 $52 $50 $211 65 
  
 
 
 
 
 

Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Tax and Minority Interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Chemical Products $147 $72 $134 $242 65 
Acetate Products  15  9  (25) (2)>100 
Technical Polymers Ticona  176  45  55  124 (30)
Performance Products  (55) 11  12  30 >100 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  283  137  176  394 39 
Other Activities  (77) (57) (311) (290)>100 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Total Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Tax and Minority Interests $206 $80 $(135)$104 (50)
  
 
 
 
 
 

Stock Appreciation Rights

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Chemical Products $(10)$ $ $ >100 
Acetate Products  (3)      >100 
Technical Polymers Ticona  (9)   (1) (1)(89)
Performance Products  (1)      >100 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  (23)   (1) (1)>(96)
Other Activities  (18)      >100 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Total Stock Appreciation Rights $(41)$ $(1)$(1)>(98)
  
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
  
  
 
 
 Pro forma
  
 
 
  
 Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six
Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 
 
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 Nine Months
Change
in %

 
 
 (in millions, except percentages, unaudited)

 
Depreciation and Amortization               
Chemical Products $116 $39 $77 $108 (7)%
Acetate Products  43  13  30  42 (2)
Technical Polymers Ticona  43  16  34  54 26 
Performance Products  6  2  5 $12 100 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  208  70  146  216 4 
Other Activities  5  2  4  6 20 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Total Depreciation and Amortization $213 $72 $150 $222 4%
  
 
 
 
 
 

Factors Affecting Pro forma Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Segment Sales

 
 Volume
 Price
 Currency
 Other
 Total
 
Chemical Products 6%3%4%(6)%7%
Acetate Products 8 1   9 
Technical Polymers Ticona 15 (5)5  15 
Performance Products 12 (15)8  5 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total 8%(1)%4%(4)%9%
  
 
 
 
 
 

Summary by Business Segment—Pro forma Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 Pro forma
  
  
 
 
  
 Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six
Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 Nine Months
 
 
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 
 Change
in $

 Change
in %

 
 
  
 (in millions, except percentages, unaudited)

  
  
 
Net sales $2,299 $818 $1,648 $2,466 167 7%
Net sales variance:                 
 Volume           6%    
 Price           3%    
 Currency           4%    
 Other           (6)%    
Operating profit  123  65  119  220 97 79%
Operating margin  5.4% 7.9% 7.2% 8.9%    
Special charges  1  (1) (4) (3)(4)>100%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  147  72  134  242 95 65%
Depreciation and amortization  116  39  77  108 (8)(7)%

        Chemical Products' pro forma net sales increased by 7% to $2,466 million compared to the same period last year as increased volumes (+6%), favorable currency movements (+4%) and higher pricing (+3%) were partially offset by changes in the composition of the segment (-6%).

        The changes in the composition of the segment result from the transfer of the European oxo business into a joint venture in the fourth quarter of 2003 (-4%) and a change in the structure of the business under which certain acrylates products, which were formerly sold into the merchant market, are now being sold under a contract manufacturing agreement (-2%). Only the margin realized under the contract manufacturing agreement is reported in net sales.

        Volumes rose for major chemical products, particularly vinyl acetate monomer, which increased due to stronger overall demand and a competitor outage. Volumes also increased for polyvinyl alcohol in North America and Europe, and emulsions in Europe. Pricing increased for most acetyl and acetyl derivative products, particularly vinyl acetate monomer in all regions, following rising costs for raw materials, particularly ethylene.

        Pro forma operating profit increased by 79% to $220 million compared to operating profit as reported for the same period in 2003. Higher volumes, higher selling prices, lower stock appreciation rights expense and the absence of a loss from the European oxo business more than offset increased raw material costs and higher special charges associated with productivity initiatives. Pro forma operating profit for the first nine months of 2004 included lower net depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the preliminary purchase price allocation and lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs resulting from the pro forma adjustments.

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 Pro forma
  
  
 
 
  
 Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six
Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 Nine Months
 
 
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 
 Change
in $

 Change
in %

 
 
  
 (in millions, except percentages, unaudited)

  
  
 
Net sales $479 $172 $349 $521 $42 9%
Net sales variance:                  
 Volume           8%     
 Price           1%     
Operating profit  10  9  (29) (6) (16)>100%
Operating margin  2.1%  5.2% (8.3)% (1.2)%     
Special charges      (50) (50) (50)100%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  15  9  (25) (2) (17)>100%
Depreciation and amortization  43  13  30  42  (1)(2)%

        Acetate Products' pro forma net sales in the first nine months of 2004 increased by 9% to $521 million compared to the same period last year due to higher volumes (+8%) and slightly higher pricing (+1).

        Volumes grew on higher tow demand in Asia, which was partly offset by lower filament sales, primarily in Mexico. Average pricing increased for both tow and filament.



        Pro forma operating profit declined to a loss of $6 million in the first nine months of 2004 from an operating profit as reported of $10 million in the same period last year reflecting special charges of $50 million for asset impairments associated with the planned consolidation of tow production and the termination of filament production around mid-2005. In addition, we recorded $8 million of depreciation expense in the first nine months of 2004 for asset retirement obligations associated with the restructuring. The Company expects to record severance liabilities of approximately $40 milllion in the fourth quarter of 2004, with a corresponding increase in goodwill. Higher volumes, savings from productivity gains, increased pricing and lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs resulting from the pro forma adjustments.

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 Pro forma
  
  
 
 
  
 Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six
Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

  
 Nine Months
 
 
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 
 Change
in $

 Change
in %

 
 
  
 (in millions, except percentages, unaudited)

  
  
 
Net sales $574 $227 $433 $660 $86 15  %
Net sales variance:                  
 Volume           15  %     
 Price           (5)%     
 Currency           5  %     
Operating profit  134  31  26  81  (53)(40)%
Operating margin  23.3% 13.7% 6.0% 12.3  %     
Special charges:                  
 Insurance recoveries associated with plumbing cases  106     1  1  (105)(99)%
 Restructuring, impairment and other special charges, net  (3) (1) (5) (5) (2)67%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  176  45  55  124  (52)(30)%
Depreciation and amortization  43  16  34  54  11 26  %

        Pro forma net sales for Ticona in the first nine months of 2004 increased by 15% to $660 million compared to the same period last year. Strong volume increases (+15%) and favorable currency effects (+5%) were partly offset by a decline in pricing (-5%).

        Volumes increased in most business lines, particularly in polyacetal, Vectra liquid crystal polymers and GUR ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Polyacetal volumes grew on stronger sales in the medical and automotive industries in North America while European sales benefited from greater demand for uses in consumer products and the commercialization of new applications. Volumes for Vectra rose in North America and Europe due to new commercial applications, such as in household goods, and stronger sales to the electrical/electronics industry. GUR volumes grew as a result of increased sales for new specialty applications. Overall pricing declined due to changes in product mix and ongoing competitive pricing pressure from Asian exports of polyacetal into North America and Europe.


        Pro forma operating profit in the first nine months of 2004 decreased to $81 million from $134 million of operating profit as reported in the prior year as insurance recoveries relating to the plumbing cases decreased significantly to $1 million in 2004 compared to $106 million in the same period last year. Pro forma operating profit in the first nine months of 2004 benefited from higher volumes, the favorable effects from a build-up of inventory in anticipation of a plant maintenance turnaround and lower average production costs for Vectra. These factors were partly offset by lower pricing and higher hydrocarbon-based raw material costs. Pro forma operating profit for the first nine months of 2004 included higher net depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the preliminary purchase price allocation which was offset by lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs resulting from the pro forma adjustments.

        Pro forma earnings from continuing operations before tax and minority interests decreased to $124 million from $176 million as reported in the same period in 2003. This decrease resulted primarily from the lower operating profit and interest income relating to insurance recoveries, which was partly offset by improved equity earnings from Asian and U.S. affiliates due to increased sales volumes.

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 Pro forma
  
  
 
 
 Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six
Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 Nine Months
 
 
 Change
in $

 Change
in %

 
 
 (in millions except percentages, unaudited)

 
Net sales $130 $44 $92 $136 $6 5%
Net sales variance:                  
 Volume           12%     
 Price           (15)%     
 Currency           8%     
Operating profit (loss)  (55) 11  14  32  87 >100%
Operating margin  (42.3)% 25.0% 15.2% 23.5%     
Special charges—Sorbates antitrust matters  (95)       95 (100)%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  (55) 11  12  30  85 >100%
Depreciation and amortization  6  2  5  12  6 100%

        Pro forma net sales for the Performance Products segment, which consists of the Nutrinova food ingredients business, increased by 5% to $136 million compared to the same period last year as increased volumes (+12%) and favorable currency effects (+8%), resulting from the significant appreciation of the euro versus the U.S. dollar, offset price decreases (-15%).

        Increased volumes for Sunett sweetener reflected strong growth from new and existing applications in the U.S. and European beverage and confectionary markets. Pricing for Sunett declined on lower unit selling prices associated with higher volumes to major customers and the anticipated expiration of the primary European and U.S. production patents in 2005.

        Pricing for sorbates, which had been under pressure from Asian producers, began to stabilize, although worldwide overcapacity still prevailed in the industry.

        Pro forma operating profit increased to $32 million compared to an operating loss of $55 million as reported in the same period last year, which included special charges of $95 million related to



antitrust actions in the sorbates industry. Pro forma operating profit in 2004 benefited from strong volumes for Sunett and favorable currency movements. For the first nine months of 2004, pro forma operating profit included higher net pro forma depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the pro forma adjustments.

        Other Activities primarily consists of corporate center costs, including financing and certain administrative activities, and certain other operating entities, including the captive insurance companies.

        Pro forma net sales for Other Activities increased by 17% to $42 million compared to the same period last year, primarily due to higher third party revenue by the captive insurance companies.

        Pro forma operating loss increased to $116 million compared to an operating loss of $84 million as reported for the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to special charges of $8 million mainly related to costs associated with severance and organization redesign projects. The operating loss in the first nine months in 2003 included $18 million in expense for stock appreciation rights.

        Pro forma earnings from continuing operations before tax and minority interests increased to a loss of $290 million from a loss of $77 million as reported in the same period last year. This increase is primarily due to higher pro forma interest expense resulting from the higher pro forma debt levels and interest rates associated with the pro forma adjustments. Also contributing to this decrease were higher operating losses and the absence of $18 million of income from the demutualization of an insurance provider.

Selected Data by Business Segment—Annual Results

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
 
 $
 % of
Segments(1)

 $
 % of
Segments(1)

 $
 % of
Segments(1)

 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Net Sales(2)                
Chemical Products $2,522 63%$2,419 63%$3,065 66%
Acetate Products  682 17  632 16  655 14 
Technical Polymers Ticona  632 16  656 17  762 16 
Performance Products  142 4  151 4  169 4 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  3,978 100% 3,858 100% 4,651 100%
     
    
    
 
Other Activities  75    52    49   
Intersegment Eliminations  (83)   (74)   (97)  
  
   
   
   
 Total Net Sales $3,970   $3,836   $4,603   
  
   
   
   


Special Charges(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Chemical Products $(377)91%$2 (50)%$1 (14)%
Acetate Products  (44)11       
Technical Polymers Ticona                
 Plumbing actions  28 (7)    107 n.m. 
 Other activities  (20)5  (6)n.m.  (20)n.m. 
Performance Products                
 Sorbates antitrust matters        (95)n.m. 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total $(413)100% (4)100% (7)100%
Other Activities  (3)   9    2   
  
   
   
   
Total Special Charges $(416)  $5   $(5)  
  
   
   
   

Operating Profit (Loss)(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Chemical Products $(358)102%$152 61%$138 60%
Acetate Products  (27)8  31 12  13 6 
Technical Polymers Ticona  (4)1  23 9  122 53 
Performance Products  39 (11) 45 18  (44)(19)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  (350)100% 251 100% 229 100%
     
    
    
 
Other Activities  (67)   (78)   (111)  
  
   
   
   
 Total Operating Profit (Loss) $(417)  $173   $118   
  
   
   
   

Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Tax And Minority Interests(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Chemical Products $(328)107%$165 57%$182 57%
Acetate Products  (15)5  43 15  17 5 
Technical Polymers Ticona  (2)1  35 12  167 52 
Performance Products  39 (13) 45 16  (44)(14)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  (306)100% 288 100% 322 100%
     
    
    
 
Other Activities  (113)   (104)   (119)  
  
   
   
   
Total Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Tax and Minority Interests $(419)  $184   $203   
  
   
   
   



Depreciation and Amortization(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Chemical Products $185 57%$130 54%$157 55%
Acetate Products  65 20  53 22  66 23 
Technical Polymers Ticona  67 21  52 21  57 20 
Performance Products  6 2  7 3  7 2 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Segment Total  323 100% 242 100% 287 100%
     
    
    
 
Other Activities  3    5    7   
  
   
   
   
 Total Net Sales $326   $247   $294   
  
   
   
   

(1)
The percentages in this column represent the percentage contribution of each segment to the total of all segments.

(2)
Derived from the accompanying audited Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.

n.m.
= not meaningful

Summary by Business Segment—2003 Compared with 2002

 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Change in $
 Change in %
 
 
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Net sales $2,419 $3,065 $646 27%
Net sales variance:            
 Volume     2%     
 Price     9%     
 Currency     5%     
 Other     11%     
Operating profit  152  138  (14)(9)%
Operating margin  6.3% 4.5%     
Special charges  2  1  (1)(50)%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  165  182  17 10%
Depreciation and amortization  130  157  27 21%

        Net sales of Chemical Products rose 27% to $3,065 million in 2003 compared to $2,419 million in 2002, due to the full year effect of the emulsions business acquired at year-end 2002 (+12%), higher selling prices (+9%), favorable currency effects (+5%) as well as increased volumes (+2%). These increases were partly offset by the transfer of the European oxo business to a joint venture in the fourth quarter 2003 (-1%).

        Compared to 2002, selling prices in 2003 increased for major products, including acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer, following the substantial rise in raw material costs, particularly natural gas, ethylene, and propylene. Volumes rose for acetic acid, particularly in Asia, as volumes were comparably higher due, in part, to an interruption in production in 2002. Vinyl acetate monomer volumes were



higher in most regions, partly due to competitor outages, while volumes declined for polyvinyl alcohol in Asia and specialties mainly in Europe due to competitive pricing.

        Chemical Products had income from special charges of $1 million in 2003 and $2 million in 2002. The income recorded in 2003 and 2002 relate to favorable adjustments to previously recorded restructuring reserves that more than offset employee severance costs related to production facility closures.

        Operating profit decreased to $138 million in 2003 from $152 million in 2002. The contribution from the emulsions business, favorable currency movements and cost reductions were outweighed by higher energy costs and an increase in stock appreciation rights expense of $13 million. Termination benefit expenses of $14 million were recorded in cost of sales, primarily in the fourth quarter of 2003, related to the streamlining of manufacturing operations and administrative functions. Overall in 2003, increased selling prices offset higher raw material costs, although pricing outpaced raw material costs in the first half of the year and lagged in the second half.

        Operating profit as a percentage of sales declined to 4.5% in 2003 compared to 6.3% in 2002.

        Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests increased to $182 million in 2003 compared to $165 million in 2002. This increase resulted from higher dividends from the Saudi Arabian investment, primarily due to higher methanol pricing partially offset by lower operating profit.

 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Change in $
 Change in %
 
 
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Net sales $632 $655 $23 4%
Net sales variance:            
 Volume     2%     
 Price     2%     
Operating profit  31  13  (18)(58)%
Operating margin  4.9% 2.0%     
Special charges         
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  43  17  (26)(60)%
Depreciation and amortization  53  66  13 25%

        Net sales for the Acetate Products segment increased by 4% to $655 million in 2003 from $632 million in 2002 largely due to higher pricing (+2%) and higher volumes (+2%).

        Average pricing rose in 2003 as higher tow prices offset slightly lower filament prices. Volumes grew as higher demand for filament and flake more than offset slightly lower tow volumes, primarily in Europe and Africa. Despite a long-term trend of declining global demand for filament, volumes improved mainly due to higher demand from the U.S. fashion industry. Volumes of acetate flake, a primary raw material in acetate filament and tow production, also increased due to higher opportunistic sales in the merchant market.

        The Acetate Products segment recorded an operating profit of $13 million in 2003, compared to $31 million in 2002 as higher pricing and volumes, as well as productivity gains, only partially offset higher raw material and energy prices. The segment also incurred costs for transitioning to new wood pulp suppliers as a primary supplier closed its U.S. facility in 2003. In accordance with SFAS No. 143, the Acetate Products segment recorded a charge of $8 million, included within depreciation expense, as



the result of a worldwide assessment of our acetate production capacity. That assessment concluded that it was probable that certain facilities would be closed in the latter half of the decade. In October 2004, we announced plans to consolidate flake and tow production by early 2007 and to discontinue production of filament by mid-2005. This decision resulted in impairment charges in the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and is expected to result in significant severance costs in the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

        Operating profit as a percentage of sales declined to 2.0% in 2003 compared to 4.9% in 2002.

        Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests declined to $17 million in 2003 compared to $43 million in 2002. This decline resulted from lower operating profit and lower dividend income from investments in China, where earnings are being reinvested for capacity expansions.

 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Change in $
 Change in %
 
 
 2002
 2003
 
 
 in millions, except percentages

 
Net sales $656 $762 $106 16%
Net sales variance:            
 Volume     11      
 Price     (3)%     
 Currency     8%     
Operating profit  23  122  99 >100%
Operating margin  3.5% 16.0%     
Special charges  (6) 87  93 >100%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  35  167  132 >100%
Depreciation and amortization  52  57  5 10%

        Net sales for Ticona increased by 16% to $762 million in 2003 from $656 million in 2002 as higher volumes (+11%) and favorable currency movements (+8%) were partly offset by lower selling prices (-3%).

        Volumes increased in most business lines, particularly in polyacetal and GUR ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. The global volume growth in polyacetals resulted from sales to new customers and end-uses. Volumes for GUR increased as the result of the commercialization of new applications in North America and Europe, as well as the exit of a major competitor in North America. Pricing declined on a higher percentage of sales from lower priced products and increased competitive pressure from Asian imports of polyacetal into North America.

        Ticona recorded income from special charges of $87 million in 2003 compared to expense of $6 million in 2002. The income in 2003 primarily resulted from insurance recoveries of $107 million associated with the plumbing cases, which was partially offset by restructuring charges for organizational redesign costs of $12 million and the closure of the Telford, UK, compounding facility of $8 million. The 2002 expense resulted from restructuring costs associated with the consolidation of manufacturing operations in Europe and the United States.

        Operating profit increased to $122 million in 2003 versus $23 million in 2002. Income from insurance recoveries, higher volumes, and reduced spending more than offset higher raw material and energy costs, lower pricing, and higher expense associated with stock appreciation rights of $13 million. Ticona continued to incur significant market development costs for cyclo-olefin copolymers in 2003.



Termination benefit expenses of $9 million were recorded in cost of sales, primarily in the fourth quarter 2003, related to the streamlining of manufacturing operations and administrative functions.

        Operating profit as a percentage of sales increased from 3.5% in 2002 to 16.0% in 2003, which included the favorable effects of $107 million of income associated with the plumbing cases.

        Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests increased to $167 million in 2003 compared to $35 million in 2002. This increase resulted from higher operating profit and higher equity earnings from Polyplastics, due to growth in the Chinese and Taiwanese economies in 2003, as well as interest income from insurance recoveries.

 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Change in $
 Change in %
 
 
 2002
 2003
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Net sales $151 $169 $18 12%
Net sales variance:            
 Volume     6%     
 Price     (11)%     
 Currency     17%     
Operating profit  45  (44) (89)>100%
Operating margin  29.8% (26.0)%     
Special charges    (95) (95)  
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  45  (44) (89)>100%
Depreciation and amortization  7  7   0%

        Net sales for the Performance Products segment, which consists of the Nutrinova food ingredients business, increased by 12% to $169 million in 2003 from $151 million in 2002 due to favorable currency movements (+17%) and increased volumes (+6%), partially offset by price decreases (-11%).

        Pricing for Sunett sweetener declined primarily as a result of lower unit selling prices associated with higher volumes to major customers and the anticipated expiration of the European and U.S. production patents in 2005. Increased Sunett volumes reflected strong growth from new applications in the U.S. and European beverage and confectionary markets. In sorbates, pricing and volume pressure from Asian producers intensified during 2003 due to worldwide overcapacity.

        Performance Products recorded special charges of $95 million in 2003, related to a decision by the European Commission on antitrust matters in the sorbates industry.

        Operating profit and earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests declined from $45 million in 2002 to a loss of $44 million in 2003, due to special charges and lower pricing. This decline was slightly offset by favorable currency movements, higher Sunett volumes, cost reductions and increased productivity.

        Net sales for Other Activities decreased by 6% to $49 million in 2003 from $52 million in 2002, primarily reflecting slightly lower third party sales by the captive insurance companies.

        Other Activities recorded $2 million of income in special charges in 2003 compared to $9 million of income in 2002. The $2 million represented higher than expected collections of a note receivable. The $9 million of income in 2002 related to a reduction in environmental reserves due to a settlement of obligations associated with former Hoechst entities.



        The operating loss of Other Activities increased to $111 million in 2003 compared to $78 million in 2002. This increase was primarily the result of higher expense for stock appreciation rights of $27 million and lower income from special charges, offset by $17 million of increased income from the captive insurance companies mainly due to a reduction in loss reserves resulting from expired policies and actuarial revaluations.

        Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests increased to a loss of $119 million in 2003 compared to a loss of $104 million in 2002. This decline resulted from higher operating losses partially offset by lower interest expense and higher interest and other income, net. Lower interest expense is primarily due to lower interest rates and currency translation effects as well as lower average debt levels. Higher interest and other income, net resulted primarily from income of $18 million from the demutualization of an insurance provider and the gain on sale of investments of $4 million, partially offset by expense of $14 million related to the unfavorable currency effects on the unhedged position of intercompany net receivables denominated in U.S. dollars.

Summary by Business Segment—2002 Compared with 2001

 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Change in $
 Change in %
 
 
 2001
 2002
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Net sales $2,522 $2,419 $(103)(4%)
Net sales variance:            
 Volume     4%     
 Price     (10)%     
 Currency     2%     
Operating profit  (358) 152  510 >100%
Operating margin  (14.2)% 6.3%   0%
Special charges  (377) 2  379 >100%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  (328) 165  493 >100%
Depreciation and amortization  185  130  (55)(30)%

        Net sales for Chemical Products decreased (-4%) to $2,419 million in 2002 from $2,522 million in 2001 primarily due to lower pricing (-10%), partially offset by higher volumes (+4%) and favorable currency effects (+2%). Selling prices for major products decreased in 2002, following the decline in raw material costs, particularly natural gas, ethylene, and propylene. Although overall selling prices were lower, acetyl pricing rose steadily throughout 2002, as a result of higher demand, temporarily tight supply conditions and a sequential quarterly increase in raw material costs. Increased demand as well as temporary supply-demand imbalances resulted in higher volumes for vinyl acetate monomer in the United States and Asia, and for acetic acid and polyvinyl alcohol, primarily in Asia.

        Chemical Products recorded income of $2 million of special charges in 2002 compared to expense of $377 million in 2001. Special charges in 2002 include employee severance costs associated with cost savings initiatives at production sites, offset by favorable adjustments to restructuring reserves recorded in 2001, due to lower than expected severance and other closure costs. The 2001 special charges resulted from the impairment of goodwill and fixed assets, as well as from 2001 restructuring initiatives.

        Of the $377 million in special charges in 2001, $218 million related to goodwill impairments, $123 million to 2001 restructuring initiatives, and $54 million to fixed asset impairments. These charges were offset by a $13 million favorable adjustment to prior year restructuring activities and in recoveries of $5 million from third party site partners. The $218 million goodwill impairment resulted primarily



from the deterioration in the outlook of the acrylates and oxo products businesses. The $123 million in restructuring initiatives included $70 million for the shutdown of the acetic acid, pentaerythritol, and vinyl acetate monomer units in Edmonton, Alberta, and $53 million relating primarily to employee severance costs at plant and administrative sites as well as closure costs associated with a research and development center in the United States. The closure of the research and development center resulted from the decision to relocate these functions to production sites. The $54 million fixed asset impairment was associated with the reassessment in the expected long-term value of the acetyl derivatives and polyol business lines.

        Operating profit for Chemical Products of $152 million in 2002 improved from an operating loss of $358 million. This improvement was primarily due to lower special charges. Operating profit also benefited from productivity improvements and cost savings from restructuring initiatives. Acetyl and acetyl derivative and polyol business lines benefited from higher sales volumes and selling prices increasing at a greater rate than raw material costs. Lower amortization expense of $45 million resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 142 also had a positive effect in 2002. Operating profit in 2001 benefited from a $34 million non-recurring compensation payment associated with operational problems experienced by the carbon monoxide supplier to Celanese's Singapore facility from July 2000 through May 2001. The carbon monoxide supplier experienced operational difficulties in the third quarter 2002, which were corrected during the fourth quarter and had minimal impact on full year 2002 operating results due to insurance recoveries.

        At the end of 2002, Celanese completed the acquisition of the European emulsions businesses of Clariant. Beginning in 2003, the businesses were integrated into the Chemical Products segment.

 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Change in $
 Change in %
 
 
 2001
 2002
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Net sales $682 $632 $(50)$(7%)
Net sales variance:             
 Volume     (7)%      
Operating profit  (27) 31  58  >100%
Operating margin  (4.0)% 4.9%    0%
Special charges  (44)   44  >100%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  (15) 43  58  >100%
Depreciation and amortization  65  53  (12) -18%

Net sales for the Acetate Products segment decreased by 7% to $632 million in 2002 from $682 million in 2001 due to lower sales volumes in 2002. Average pricing for acetate was stable in 2002 as higher tow prices offset lower filament pricing. Volumes declined mainly due to lower demand for acetate filament from the U.S. and European textile industries and ongoing fiber substitution. Volumes of acetate flake, a primary raw material in acetate filament and tow production, also decreased due to lower merchant sales. Tow volumes were slightly lower in 2002 mainly due to reduced volumes in North America and Europe, partially offset by improvements in other regions.

        The Acetate Products segment recorded no special charges in 2002 compared to $44 million in 2001. The charges in 2001 resulted from the costs associated with the closure of acetate filament operations in Rock Hill, South Carolina and Lanaken, Belgium as well as costs incurred for with the relocation of filament operations within the United States. Additional special charges were incurred in connection with employee severance costs associated with a production facility in Mexico.


        The Acetate Products segment recorded an operating profit of $31 million in 2002, compared to an operating loss of $27 million in 2001. Operating profit in 2002 benefited from the absence of special charges and a $9 million decrease in amortization expense resulting from the implementation of SFAS No. 142. Cost reductions from the Forward program and other productivity initiatives partially offset the effects of lower sales volumes.

 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Change in $
 Change in %
 
 
 2001
 2002
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Net sales $632 $656 $24 4%
Net sales variance:            
 Volume     5%     
 Price     (3)%     
 Currency     2%     
Operating profit  (4) 23  27 >100%
Operating margin  (0.6)% 3.5%   0%
Special charges  8  (6) (14)>100%
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  (2) 35  37 >100%
Depreciation and amortization  67  52  (15)(22)%

        Net sales for the Ticona segment increased by 4% to $656 million in 2002 from $632 million in 2001 as the result of higher volumes (+5%) and favorable currency movements (+2%), which were offset by lower selling prices (-3%). Volumes increased mainly in polyacetal, reflecting some improvement in demand from the automotive and other end-use industries, especially in Europe. Volumes also improved in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, but declined or were flat in other product lines. Average selling prices declined for most product lines, primarily polyacetal. Polyacetal standard-grade pricing was reduced in response to competitive pressure, mainly from Asian suppliers.

        In special charges, the Ticona segment had expense of $6 million in 2002 compared to income of $8 million in 2001. The 2002 expense resulted from restructuring costs associated with the consolidation of manufacturing operations in Europe and the United States. The favorable adjustment in 2001 was primarily due to higher than expected insurance reimbursements associated with the plumbing cases, which were largely offset by restructuring expenses for employee severance costs in the United States and Europe. These 2001 restructuring initiatives were taken to streamline administrative and operational functions under Celanese's Forward initiative.

        The Ticona segment recorded an operating profit of $23 million in 2002 compared to an operating loss of $4 million in 2001. The major factors contributing to the earnings improvement were reduced raw material costs and increased sales volumes. Operating results in 2002 also benefited from $20 million of lower amortization expense due to the adoption of SFAS No. 142. These improvements were partially offset by costs for maintenance shutdowns and startup costs related to expansions, as well as the higher special charges noted above. The Ticona segment continued to incur market development costs for cyclo-olefin copolymers in 2002.



 
 Year Ended December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Change in $
 Change in %
 
 
 2001
 2002
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
Net sales $142 $151 $9 6%
Net sales variance:            
 Volume     10%     
 Price     (8)%     
 Currency     4%     
 Other           
Operating profit  39  45  6 15%
Operating margin  27.5% 29.8%     
Special charges         
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax and minority interests  39  45  6 15%
Depreciation and amortization  6  7  1 17%

        Net sales for the Performance Products segment, which consists of the Nutrinova food ingredients business, increased by 6% to $151 million in 2002 from $142 million in 2001 due to increased volumes (+10%) as well as favorable currency movements (+4%), which were largely offset by price decreases (-8%). Increased volumes reflected strong growth of the high intensity sweetener Sunett from new applications in the beverage and confectionary industries in the United States and Europe. Overall pricing declined, mainly in connection with higher Sunett volumes to major customers. In sorbates, pricing pressure from Asian competitors intensified in 2002, mainly in the fourth quarter, due to worldwide overcapacity.

        Operating profit for the Performance Products segment of $45 million in 2002 improved from $39 million in 2001. The increase is mainly a result of higher volumes from new applications in Sunett, increased yields from manufacturing efficiencies and cost reductions, which were mostly offset by lower pricing as noted above.

        Net sales for Other Activities decreased by 31% to $52 million in 2002 from $75 million in 2001. This decline was primarily due to the divestiture of an InfraServ subsidiary during the first quarter of 2002 and the expiration of a number of service contracts and licensing fees at Celanese Ventures GmbH.

        Other Activities recorded $9 million of income in special charges in 2002 compared to a charge of $3 million in 2001. The $9 million income in 2002 relates to a reduction in environmental reserves due to a settlement of obligations associated with former Hoechst entities. The $3 million expense in 2001 primarily consisted of corporate employee severance costs, which were partially offset by a $3 million favorable adjustment related to a net reduction in reserves associated with settlements of environmental indemnification and other obligations associated with former Hoechst entities.

        The operating loss of Other Activities increased to $78 million in 2002 from $67 million in 2001. This was primarily due to an adjustment to loss reserves at the captive insurance companies and the reduction of revenues from Celanese Ventures. This decrease was partially offset by a gain of $9 million on the sale of an InfraServ subsidiary and an increase in income related to adjustments in special charges.



Summary of Consolidated Results—Pro Forma Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003

        For the first nine months of 2004, pro forma net sales increased to $3,737 million compared to $3,448 million as reported for the same period in 2003. Volume increases in all segments and favorable currency effects resulting mainly from the stronger euro versus the U.S. dollar were partially offset by reductions due to changes in the composition of our Chemical Products segment and slightly lower pricing, primarily in the Ticona and Performance Products segments.

        Pro forma cost of sales increased by $98 million to $2,979 million for the first nine months of 2004 versus the comparable period last year. Higher raw material costs and unfavorable currency effects were partially offset by decreases due to changes in the composition of our Chemical Products segment. Pro forma cost of sales for the first nine months of 2004 also included lower depreciation expense resulting from the preliminary purchase price allocation and lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs resulting from the pro forma adjustments.

        Pro forma selling, general and administrative expense increased by $30 million to $414 million for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to organizational redesign costs and unfavorable currency movements as well as higher amortization expense resulting from the preliminary purchase price allocation, which were partially offset by $37 million of lower stock appreciation rights expense and lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs resulting from the pro forma adjustments.

        Pro forma special charges increased to expense of $65 million for the first nine months of 2004 from income of $9 million as reported in the same period last year. Pro forma special charges in the first nine months of 2004 largely represented asset impairments for the Acetate Products restructuring, while special charges for the same period in 2003 resulted mainly from income of $106 million from insurance recoveries, which were largely offset by expenses of $95 million associated with antitrust matters in the sorbates industry.

        Pro forma operating profit increased by 65% to $211 million compared to the same period last year. Pro forma operating profit for the first nine months of 2004 benefited from volume increases and $40 million of lower expense for stock appreciation rights, which were offset by higher raw material costs, higher special charges and slightly lower pricing. For the first nine months of 2004, pro forma operating profit also included lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs resulting from the pro forma adjustments. The lower net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs were primarily driven by the effects of fair value adjustments associated with the pension and OPEB liabilities resulting from the application of purchase accounting and the pre-funding of pension contributions in connection with the pro forma adjustments.

        Pro forma equity in net earnings of affiliates rose by $18 million to $47 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period last year. This increase primarily represents improved equity earnings from Asian and U.S. affiliates, due to increased sales volumes. Cash distributions received from equity affiliates were $36 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to $21 million in the same period of 2003. European Oxo GmbH, Celanese's oxo chemicals joint venture


is expected to record significant restructuring charges in the fourth quarter of 2004. Accordingly, we expect this will negatively impact our equity in net earnings of affiliates.

        Pro forma interest expense increased to $184 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $36 million as reported for the same period last year, primarily due to higher debt levels and interest rates associated with the pro forma adjustments.

        For the first nine months of 2004, pro forma interest income decreased by $15 million to $20 million compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to significantly lower interest income associated with insurance recoveries.

        Pro forma other income (expense), net decreased by $40 million to $10 million compared to the same period last year. This decrease is primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency exchange effects on cash and cash equivalents and the absence of $18 million in income from the demutualization of an insurance provider. Dividend income from investments in the first nine months of 2004 accounted for under the cost method increased to $38 million compared to $33 million in the same period in the prior year.

        We recorded pro forma income tax expense of $104 million for the first nine months of 2004, which is primarily due to the non-recognition of certain tax benefits from losses and valuation allowances applied against certain deferred tax assets and the tax effects of the pro forma adjustments. For the same period in 2003, we recognized $68 million of expense based on a projected annual effective tax rate of 33%.

        For the first nine months of 2004, pro forma minority interests increased to $17 million from $0 million as reported in the same period in the prior year. This increase primarily relates to the minority interests in the earnings of Celanese.

Summary of Consolidated Results—2003 Compared with 2002

        Net sales increased by $767 million to $4,603 million in 2003 as compared to $3,836 million in 2002 due primarily to the full year effect of the emulsions business acquired at year-end 2002, favorable currency movements resulting from the strengthening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar as well as higher selling prices and volumes. Overall, all segments had an increase in net sales.

        Cost of sales increased by 22% to $3,883 million in 2003 compared with $3,171 million in 2002. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales also increased to 84% in 2003 from 83% in 2002, reflecting significantly higher raw material and energy costs, partly offset by increased selling prices primarily in the Chemical Products segment.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 14% to $510 million in 2003 from $446 million in 2002 primarily due to a $51 million increase in expenses for stock appreciation rights,


unfavorable currency effects as well as the inclusion of the emulsions business. This increase was partially offset by cost reduction efforts.


        Research and development expenses increased by 37% to $89 million in 2003 from $65 million in 2002. This increase resulted primarily from currency movements, the inclusion of the emulsions business and expiration of cost sharing arrangements at Celanese Ventures during 2002. Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales increased to 1.9% for 2003 from 1.7% in 2002.

        Special charges include provisions for restructuring and other expenses and income incurred outside the normal course of ongoing operations. Restructuring provisions represent costs related to severance and other benefit programs related to major activities undertaken to redesign Celanese's operations, as well as costs incurred in connection with a decision to exit non-strategic businesses and the related closure of facilities. These measures are based on formal management decisions, establishment of agreements with the employees' representatives or individual agreements with the affected employees as well as the public announcement of the restructuring plan.

        The components of special charges for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were as follows:

 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
 
 (in millions)

 
Employee termination benefits $18 $8 $112 
Plant/office closures  7  6  93 
Restructuring adjustments  (6) (10) (17)
  
 
 
 
 Total Restructuring  19  4  188 
Sorbates antitrust matters  95     
Plumbing actions  (107)   (28)
Asset impairments      261 
Third-party reimbursements of restructuring charges    (1) (7)
Other  (2) (8) 2 
  
 
 
 
 Total Special Charges $5 $(5)$416 
  
 
 
 

        In 2003, Celanese recorded expenses of $5 million in special charges, which consisted of $25 million of restructuring charges, $6 million of income from favorable adjustments to restructuring reserves that were recorded previously, and $14 million of income from other special charges. The $25 million of additions to the restructuring reserve included employee severance costs of $18 million and plant and office closure costs of $7 million. Within other special charges there was income of $107 million related to insurance recoveries associated with the plumbing cases, partially offset by $95 million of expenses for antitrust matters in the sorbates industry, primarily related to a decision by the European Commission.

        In 2003, the Chemical Products segment recorded employee severance charges of $4 million, which primarily related to the shutdown of an obsolete synthesis gas unit in Germany.

        Ticona started a redesign of its operations. Approximately 160 positions are expected to be reduced by 2005, as a result of the redesign. These plans included a decision to sell the Summit, New Jersey site and to relocate administrative and research and development activities to the existing Ticona site in Florence, Kentucky in 2004. As a result of this decision, Celanese recorded termination benefit expenses of $5 million in 2003. In addition to the relocation in the United States, Ticona has streamlined its operations in Germany, primarily through offering employees early retirement benefits under an existing employee benefit arrangement. As a result of this arrangement, Ticona recorded a charge of $7 million in 2003. Additional severance costs to be recorded in special charges, related to the redesign, are expected to be approximately $1 million per quarter in 2004.



        In addition, Ticona ceased its manufacturing operations in Telford, United Kingdom during 2003, based on a 2002 restructuring initiative to concentrate its European manufacturing operations in



Germany. As a result, Ticona recorded contract termination costs and asset impairments totaling $7 million and employee severance costs of $1 million in 2003. The total costs of the Telford shutdown through 2003 are $12 million.

        The $6 million of income from favorable adjustments of previously recorded restructuring reserves consisted of a $1 million adjustment to the 2002 reserves, a $4 million adjustment to the 2001 reserves and a $1 million adjustment to the 1999 reserves. The adjustment to the 2002 reserve related to lower than expected costs related to the demolition of the GUR Bayport facility. The adjustment to the 2001 reserve was primarily due to the lower than expected decommissioning costs of the Mexican production facility. The adjustment to the 1999 reserve was due to lower than expected payments related to the closure of a former administrative facility in the United States.

        In 2002, Celanese recorded income from special charges of $5 million, which consisted of $14 million of restructuring charges, $10 million of income from favorable adjustments to previously recorded restructuring reserves, $1 million of income from reimbursements from third party site partners related to prior year initiatives, and $8 million of income from other special charges. The $14 million of restructuring charges included employee severance costs of $8 million and plant and office closure costs of $6 million.

        Project Focus, initiated in early 2001, set goals to reduce trade working capital, limit capital expenditures and improve earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization from programs to increase efficiency. Project Forward was announced in August 2001 and initiated additional restructuring and other measures to reduce costs and increase profitability. During 2002, Celanese recorded employee severance charges of $8 million, of which $3 million related to adjustments to the 2001 forward initiatives and $4 million for streamlining efforts of production facilities in Germany and the United States, and $1 million for employee severance costs in the polyvinyl alcohol business.

        Ticona recorded asset impairments of $4 million in 2002 related to a decision in 2002 to shutdown operations in Telford, United Kingdom in 2003. In addition, with the construction of a new and expanded GUR plant in Bishop, Texas, the GUR operations in Bayport, Texas, were transferred to a new facility. Decommissioning and demolition costs associated with the Bayport shutdown were $2 million.

        The $10 million of favorable adjustments of previously recorded restructuring reserves consisted of an $8 million adjustment to the 2001 reserves and a $2 million adjustment to the 2000 reserves. The 2001 adjustment was primarily due to lower than expected personnel and closure costs associated with the streamlining of chemical facilities in the United States, Canada, and Germany. The 2000 adjustment was due to lower than expected demolition costs for the Chemical Products production facility in Knapsack, Germany. The other special charges income of $8 million related to a reduction in reserves associated with settlements of environmental indemnification obligations associated with former Hoechst entities.

        Foreign exchange gain (loss) decreased to a loss of $4 million in 2003 from a gain of $3 million in 2002. This change is primarily attributable to the strengthening of the Mexican peso and Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar.

        Operating profit declined to $118 million in 2003 compared to $173 million in 2002. The favorable effects of higher selling prices primarily in the Chemical Products segment, favorable currency movements, cost reductions, and income from insurance recoveries of $107 million in the Ticona segment, were offset by expenses of $95 million in the Performance Products segment related to antitrust matters, $12 million of organizational redesign costs at Ticona, increased stock appreciation


rights expense as well as higher raw material and energy costs in most segments. Stock appreciation rights expense for 2003 was $59 million compared to $3 million in 2002. Celanese streamlined its


manufacturing operations, mainly in the Chemical Products and Ticona segments and, as a result, recorded termination benefit expenses, in cost of sales, of $26 million, primarily in the fourth quarter of 2003.

        Equity in net earnings of affiliates increased to $35 million in 2003 from $21 million in 2002. This increase was mainly attributable to an increase in the earnings from Polyplastics, an investment held by the Ticona segment, partly due to growth in the Chinese and Taiwanese economies in 2003. Cash distributions from equity affiliates were $23 million in 2003 compared to $100 million in 2002.

        Interest expense decreased by 11% to $49 million in 2003 from $55 million in 2002. This decrease is primarily related to currency translation effects and lower interest rates as well as lower average debt levels.

        Interest and other income, net increased to $99 million in 2003 from $45 million in 2002, mainly due to interest of $20 million on insurance recoveries in the Ticona segment and other income of $18 million resulting from the demutualization of an insurance provider. These increases were partially offset by expense of $14 million related to the unfavorable currency effects on the unhedged position of intercompany net receivables denominated in U.S. dollars. Investments accounted for under the cost method contributed dividend income of $60 million and $39 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in 2003 primarily resulted from higher dividends from the Saudi Arabian investment on higher methanol pricing, which were slightly offset by lower dividend income from the Acetate Products investments in China, where earnings are being reinvested for capacity expansions. Interest income increased to $44 million in 2003 from $18 million in 2002, mainly due to the interest of $20 million on insurance recoveries in the Ticona segment.

        Celanese recognized income tax expense of $60 million in 2003 compared to $61 million in 2002.

        The effective tax rate for Celanese in 2003 was 30 percent compared to 33 percent in 2002. In comparison to the German statutory rate, the 2003 effective tax rate was favorably affected by unrepatriated low-taxed earnings, favorable settlement of prior year (1996) taxes in the U.S., equity earnings from Polyplastics Co. Ltd., which are excluded from U.S. taxable income and utilization of a U.S. capital loss carryforward that had been subject to a valuation allowance. The effective tax rate was unfavorably affected in 2003 by dividend distributions from subsidiaries and writedowns of certain German corporate and trade tax benefits related to prior years.

        In comparison to the German statutory rate, the effective tax rate in 2002 was favorably affected by the utilization of certain net operating loss carryforwards in Germany, the release of certain valuation allowances on prior years' deferred tax assets, unrepatriated low-taxed earnings and a lower effective minimum tax burden in Mexico. The effective tax rate was unfavorably affected in 2002 by distributions of taxable dividends from certain equity investments and the reversal of a tax-deductible writedown in 2000 of a German investment.

        In September 2003, Celanese and Dow reached an agreement for Dow to purchase the acrylates business of Celanese. This transaction was completed in February 2004. Dow acquired Celanese's acrylates business line, including inventory, intellectual property and technology for crude acrylic acid,


glacial acrylic acid, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, methyl acrylate and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, as well as acrylates production assets at the Clear Lake, Texas facility. In related agreements, Celanese will


provide certain contract manufacturing services to Dow, and Dow will supply acrylates to Celanese for use in its emulsions production. The sale price, subject to purchase price adjustments, was $149 million. Simultaneously with the sale, Celanese repaid an unrelated obligation of $95 million to Dow. The acrylates business was part of Celanese's former Chemical Intermediates segment. As a result of this transaction, the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses related to the acrylates product lines at the Clear Lake, Texas facility are reflected as a component of discontinued operations in the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

        In December 2003, the Ticona segment completed the sale of its nylon business line to BASF. Ticona received cash proceeds of $10 million and recorded a gain of $3 million.

        In 2003, Celanese recorded $1 million in losses from operations of discontinued operations related to the acrylates and nylon business divestitures. In 2003, Celanese also recorded adjustments related to prior year discontinued operations representing a gain of $4 million.

        In December 2002, Celanese completed the sale of Trespaphan, its global oriented polypropylene ("OPP") film business, to a consortium consisting of Dor-Moplefan Group and Bain Capital, Inc. for a value of $214 million. Net of the purchase price adjustments of $19 million and the repayment of $80 million in intercompany debt that Trespaphan owed Celanese, Celanese received net proceeds of $115 million. Trespaphan was formerly part of Celanese's Performance Products segment.

        During 2002, Celanese sold its global allylamines and U.S. alkylamines businesses to U.S. Amines Ltd. These businesses were part of Celanese's former Chemical Intermediates segment.

        In 2002, Celanese received net proceeds of $106 million and recorded a pre-tax gain of $14 million on the disposal of discontinued operations relating to these divestitures. Pre-tax earnings from operations of discontinued operations in 2002 were $1 million. Celanese recognized a tax benefit of $40 million for discontinued operations, which includes a tax benefit associated with a tax deductible writedown of the tax basis for Trespaphan's subsidiary in Germany relating to tax years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. Since this tax benefit related to an entity solely engaged in a business designated as discontinued operations, this tax benefit has been correspondingly included in earnings (loss) from discontinued operations.

        In 2001, Celanese completed the sale of NADIR Filtration GmbH, formerly Celgard GmbH, and received minimal proceeds from this sale and recorded a $2 million pre-tax gain on disposal of discontinued operations. Celanese recorded an additional pre-tax gain in 2001 of $11 million on disposal of discontinued operations related to a business divested in 2000. Additionally, Celanese recognized a tax expense of $5 million for discontinued operations.

        The following table summarizes the results of the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

 
 Sales
 Operating
Profit (Loss)

 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
 
 (in millions)

 
Discontinued operations of Chemical Products $236 $246 $300 $(1)$(52)$(81)
Discontinued operations of Performance Products    257  252    10  (5)
Discontinued operations of Ticona  45  57  60    (1) (3)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total discontinued operations $281 $560 $612 $(1)$(43)$(89)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

        Celanese recorded $1 million in a cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, net of tax, on January 1, 2003, related to the adoption of SFAS 143. Celanese recognized transition amounts for existing asset retirement obligation liabilities, associated capitalized costs and accumulated depreciation.


The ongoing expense on an annual basis resulting from the initial adoption of SFAS No. 143 is not material.

        In 2002, Celanese recorded income of $18 million for the cumulative effect of two changes in accounting principles, net of tax of $5 million. The adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in 2002 resulted in income of $9 million ($0.18 per share), as it required unamortized negative goodwill (excess of fair value over cost) on the balance sheet to be written off immediately and classified as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, in 2002 Celanese changed the actuarial measurement date for its U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit plans from September 30 to December 31. As this change was accounted for as a change in accounting principle, a cumulative effect adjustment of income of $9 million ($0.18 per share), net of taxes of $5 million, was recorded in 2002.

        As a result of the factors mentioned above, the net earnings of Celanese decreased by $20 million to net earnings of $148 million in 2003 compared to $168 million in 2002.

Summary of Consolidated Results—2002 Compared with 2001

        Net sales decreased by 3% to $3,836 million in 2002 as compared to $3,970 million in 2001 primarily as a result of lower selling prices despite improved volumes in most segments and favorable currency movements. Decreases in the Chemical Products and Acetate Products segments were only slightly offset by an increase in the Ticona and Performance Products segments.

        Cost of sales decreased by 7% to $3,171 million in 2002 compared with $3,409 million in 2001. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased to 83% in 2002 from 86% in 2001, reflecting lower raw material and energy costs, primarily in the Chemical Products and Ticona segments, and cost reductions from productivity and restructuring initiatives.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by 9% to $446 million in 2002 from $489 million in 2001 driven largely by a $69 million decline in amortization expense resulting from the implementation of SFAS No. 142. Excluding the effects of this amortization expense, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales were relatively flat. Selling, general and administrative expenses were affected by lower third party commission income earned by a purchasing subsidiary of Celanese, and increased selling efforts by the Ticona segment, offset by favorable currency fluctuations and benefits from cost reduction efforts. In 2002 and 2001, Celanese had favorable adjustments of $15 million and $11 million, respectively, relating to reduction in environmental reserves due to favorable trends in environmental remediation.

        Research and development expenses decreased by 12% to $65 million in 2002 from $74 million in 2001. The reduction resulted primarily from Celanese's strategy to concentrate the research and development efforts at production sites within most businesses. Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales decreased to 1.7% in 2002 from 1.9% in 2001.


        In 2002, Celanese recorded income from special charges of $5 million, which consisted of $14 million of restructuring charges, $10 million of income from favorable adjustments to previously recorded restructuring reserves, $1 million of income from reimbursements from third party site partners related to prior year initiatives and $8 million of income from other special charges. The $14 million of restructuring charges included employee severance costs of $8 million and plant and office closure costs of $6 million.

        Project Focus, initiated in early 2001, set goals to reduce trade working capital, limit capital expenditures and improve earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization from programs to increase efficiency. Project Forward was announced in August 2001 and initiated additional restructuring and other measures to reduce costs and increase profitability. During 2002, Celanese recorded employee severance charges of $8 million, of which $3 million related to adjustments to the 2001 Forward initiatives and $4 million for streamlining efforts of production facilities in Germany and the United States, and $1 million for employee severance costs in the polyvinyl alcohol business.

        Ticona recorded asset impairments of $4 million in 2002 related to a decision in 2002 to shutdown operations in Telford, United Kingdom in 2003. In addition, with the construction of a new and expanded GUR plant in Bishop, Texas, the GUR operations in Bayport, Texas were transferred to a new facility. Decommissioning and demolition costs associated with the Bayport closure were $2 million.

        The $10 million of favorable adjustments of previously recorded restructuring reserves consisted of an $8 million adjustment to the 2001 reserves and a $2 million adjustment to the 2000 reserves. The 2001 adjustment was primarily due to lower than expected personnel and closure costs associated with the streamlining of chemical facilities in the United States, Canada, and Germany. The 2000 adjustment was due to lower than expected demolition costs for the Chemical Products production facility in Knapsack, Germany. The other special charges income of $8 million related to a reduction in reserves associated with settlements of environmental indemnification obligations associated with former Hoechst entities.

        In 2001, Celanese recorded special charges of $416 million, which consisted of $205 million of restructuring charges. These charges were reduced by $7 million of income from reimbursements from third party site partners and forfeited pension plan assets, $17 million of favorable adjustments to restructuring reserves recorded in 2001 and 2000 and $235 million of other special charges.

        The $205 million of additions to the restructuring reserve included employee severance costs primarily of $112 million and plant and office closure costs of $93 million. Employee severance costs consisted primarily of $34 million for the streamlining of chemical production and administrative positions in the United States, Germany and Singapore, $25 million for administrative and production positions at Ticona in the United States and Germany, and $20 million for the restructuring of production and administrative positions in Mexico. In addition, other related severance costs consisted of $7 million for the closure of the acetic acid, pentaerythritol and vinyl acetate monomer units and the elimination of administrative positions in Edmonton, $6 million for the elimination of corporate administrative positions, $5 million resulting from the closure of a chemical research and development center in the United States, $5 million for the shutdown of acetate filament production at Lanaken, Belgium, and $10 million for the shutdown of acetate filament production at Rock Hill, South Carolina.

        The $93 million of additions to the restructuring reserve related to plant and office closures consisting mainly of $66 million for fixed asset impairments, the cancellation of supply contracts, and other required decommissioning and environmental closure costs relating to the closure of the acetic acid, pentaerythritol and vinyl acetate monomer units in Edmonton. Also included in plant and office closure costs were $10 million for fixed asset impairments, contract cancellation and other costs



associated with the closure of the chemical research and development center in the United States, $4 million of fixed asset impairments and other closure costs related to the closure of a chemical distribution terminal in the United States, $7 million for fixed asset impairments and shutdown costs at the acetate filament facility in Lanaken, $5 million for equipment shutdown and other decommissioning costs for the acetate filament production facility at Rock Hill and $1 million associated with the cancellation of a lease associated with the closure of an administrative facility in Germany.

        The $17 million of favorable adjustments of previous year restructuring reserves consisted of a $13 million adjustment to the 2000 reserves and a $4 million adjustment to the 1999 reserves. The entire 2000 adjustment was due to lower than expected demolition and decommissioning costs for the Chemical Products production facility in Knapsack, Germany. This adjustment resulted from a third party site partner assuming ownership of an existing facility and its obligations. Of the 1999 adjustment, $2 million related to the reversal of a reserve for closure costs for a parcel of land in Celaya, Mexico, that Celanese donated to the Mexican government, which assumed the remaining liabilities. The 1999 adjustment also included $2 million relating to less than anticipated severance costs for Ticona employees in Germany.

        The other special charges of $235 million consisted of goodwill impairments of $218 million and fixed asset impairments of $27 million, related to the former Chemical Intermediates segment, $16 million of fixed asset impairments related to the former Acetyl Products segment and $5 million for the relocation of acetate filament production assets associated with restructuring initiatives. Also included in other special charges was $28 million of income from the receipt of higher than expected insurance reimbursements linked to the plumbing cases and $3 million of income related to a net reduction in reserves associated with settlements of environmental indemnification and other obligations associated with former Hoechst entities.

        Foreign exchange gain (loss) increased to $3 million in 2002 from $1 million in 2001. This change is primarily attributable to the weakening of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar as well as the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro.

        An operating profit of $173 million was generated in 2002 compared to a loss of $417 million in 2001 primarily due to a decrease in special charges from $416 million in 2001 to income of $5 million in 2002. Also contributing to the profit improvement were lower raw material and energy costs in most segments, cost reductions throughout Celanese and improved volumes. Lower amortization expense of $69 million resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 142 also had a positive effect in 2002. The profit increase was partially offset by the unfavorable effect of lower selling prices.

        Equity in net earnings of affiliates increased to $21 million in 2002 from $12 million in 2001. This increase was partially attributable to an increase in the earnings of Korea Engineering Plastics Co. Ltd. Lower goodwill amortization expense of $5 million due to the adoption of SFAS No. 142 also had a positive effect on 2002 results. Cash distributions from equity affiliates were $100 million in 2002 compared to $23 million in 2001.

        Interest expense decreased by 24% to $55 million in 2002 from $72 million in 2001, as a result of lower average financial debt and lower interest rates.


        Interest and other income, net decreased to $45 million in 2002 from $58 million in 2001, mainly due to lower dividend income from Celanese's investments, primarily from Celanese's methanol joint venture in Saudi Arabia, writedown of investments and lower interest income, partially offset by higher transaction gains on foreign currency financing. Additionally, in 2001, Celanese received gross proceeds of $9 million and recorded a gain of $5 million relating to the sale of its ownership interests in InfraServ GmbH & Co. Münchsmünster KG, Hoechst Service Gastronomie GmbH, and Covion Organic Semiconducters GmbH. Investments accounted for under the cost method contributed dividend income of $39 million and $46 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively.

        In 2002, Celanese recognized income tax expense of $61 million as compared to an income tax benefit of $106 million in 2001. Celanese also recognized in 2002 a $40 million German tax benefit relating to a tax deductible writedown of its investment in Trespaphan GmbH. This tax benefit is attributable to a discontinued business and is therefore reported as part of discontinued operations and is not included in the 2002 income tax provision.

        The effective tax rate for Celanese in 2002 was 33 percent compared to 25 percent in 2001. In comparison to the German statutory rate, the Celanese effective tax rate in 2002 was favorably affected by the utilization of certain net operating loss carryforwards in Germany, the release of certain valuation allowances on prior years' deferred tax assets, unrepatriated low-taxed earnings and a lower effective minimum tax burden in Mexico. The effective tax rate was unfavorably affected in 2002 by distributions of taxable dividends from certain equity investments and the reversal of a tax-deductible writedown in 2000 of a German investment.

        In 2001, Celanese recognized an income tax benefit of $106 million and reported an effective tax rate of 25 percent. In comparison to the German statutory rate, the effective tax rate in 2001 was favorably affected by the full recognition of previously reserved deferred tax assets of a subsidiary in Germany, the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, offset by non-deductible goodwill amortization and impairment charges.

        Celanese recorded income of $18 million for the cumulative effect of two changes in accounting principles, net of tax of $5 million, in 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 in 2002 resulted in income of $9 million ($0.18 per share), as it required unamortized negative goodwill (excess of fair value over cost) on the balance sheet to be written off immediately and classified as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, in 2002 Celanese changed the actuarial measurement date for its U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit plans from September 30 to December 31. As this change was accounted for as a change in accounting principle, a cumulative effect adjustment of income $9 million ($0.18 per share), net of taxes of $5 million, was recorded in 2002.

        As a result of the factors mentioned above, the net earnings (loss) of Celanese increased to net earnings of $168 million in 2002 from a net loss of $365 million in 2001.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Net Cash Used in/Provided by Operating Activities.    Cash flow from operating activities decreased to a cash inflow of $2 million for the first nine months of 2004 compared to a cash inflow of $231 million for the same period in 2003. This decrease primarily resulted from the payment of a $95 million obligation to a third party in the first quarter of 2004, as well as payments of $59 million associated with the exercising of stock appreciation rights in the first six months of 2004. Additionally, pension contributions increased by $53 million to $157 million compared to the same period last year. These factors were partly offset by a decline in payments associated with income taxes, bonuses and restructuring as well as lower cash consumed through changes in inventory and trade payables. The hedging of foreign currency net receivables, primarily intercompany, resulted in a $15 million cash inflow in 2004 compared to a $132 million cash inflow in 2003. Unfavorable foreign currency effects on the euro versus the U.S. dollar on cash and cash equivalents increased to $15 million for the first nine months of 2004.

        Net Cash Provided by/Used in Investing Activities.    Net cash from investing activities decreased to a cash outflow of $1,628 million for the first nine months of 2004 compared to a cash outflow of $178 million for the same period in 2003. The increased cash outflow primarily resulted from the acquisition of Celanese. Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment increased to $150 million for the first nine months of 2004 compared to $133 million in the same period in the prior year. The increase was driven by higher expenditures within the Ticona segment for an expansion of the polyacetal plant in Bishop, Texas, and the construction of a research and development and administrative building in Florence, Kentucky.

        Net Cash Used in Financing Activities.    Net cash from financing activities increased to a cash inflow of $2,405 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to a cash outflow of $135 million for the same period in 2003. The increased cash inflow primarily reflects higher net proceeds from borrowings in connection with the Transactions, partially offset by a $500 million dividend to the Original Stockholders. Refer to the Liquidity section below for additional information.

        Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities.    Net cash provided by operating activities was $401 million, $363 million, and $462 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

        Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $38 million to $401 million in 2003 as compared to 2002 primarily due to insurance recoveries of $120 million, plus interest, offset by higher net taxes paid of $143 million and lower dividends from equity investments of $41 million. In addition, higher contributions were made to Celanese's U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan of $130 million in 2003 compared to $100 million in 2002. The hedging activity of foreign currency denominated intercompany net receivables served to partially offset unfavorable currency effects on net earnings of $155 million and resulted in a $180 million cash inflow in 2003 compared to $95 million in 2002 due to the timing of settlements of these contracts.

        The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities of $99 million in 2002 as compared to 2001 is primarily due to changes in cash generated by trade working capital. In 2002, trade working capital increased slightly due to an increase in trade receivables resulting from higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2002 as compared to the fourth quarter in 2001, which was partially offset by lower inventory and increased trade accounts payable. In 2001, cash generated by trade working capital improvements related to the Project Focus initiatives was $265 million. Partially offsetting this trade



working capital effect was a reduction in the cash outflow for special charges of $27 million, a lower pension contribution to Celanese's U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan of $100 million in 2002 compared to $142 million in 2001 and an increase in dividends from equity investments of $46 million.

        Net Cash Used in Investing Activities.    Net cash used in investing activities was $275 million, $139 million and $105 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

        The increase in cash outflows of $136 million in 2003 compared to 2002 is mainly due to lower proceeds from disposal of discontinued operations of $196 million and the receipt of $39 million in returns of capital from investments in non-consolidated InfraServ companies in 2002. This increase in cash outflow for 2003 was partially offset by a $131 million cash outflow for the 2002 purchase of the net assets of the emulsions businesses. Additionally, net cash outflows increased by $41 million related to higher net purchases of marketable securities.

        Capital expenditures increased by $8 million to $211 million in 2003, primarily due to foreign currency effects. Spending in 2003 primarily related to the completion of a production facility for synthesis gas, a primary raw material at the Oberhausen site in Germany, major replacements of equipment, capacity expansions, major investments to reduce future operating costs, environmental, health and safety initiatives and the integration of a company-wide SAP platform. The spending in 2002 included the start of construction of the synthesis gas production facility at the Oberhausen site. In addition, major projects included the completion of the new GUR plant at the Bishop, Texas, facility and the capacity expansion for Vectra at Shelby, North Carolina. The Vectra expansion was built to supply the projected long-term demand of the telecommunications industry and to develop and grow emerging markets.

        The increase in cash outflows of $34 million in 2002 compared to 2001 is mainly due to a $131 million cash outflow for the fourth quarter purchase of the net assets of the emulsions businesses. Additionally, a net outflow of $22 million for the purchase of marketable securities in 2002 compared to a net inflow of $45 million on the sale of marketable securities in 2001 and an outflow of $25 million related to a long-term raw material supply contract increased the cash used compared to the prior year. Partially offsetting these effects were $206 million in proceeds from the disposal of discontinued operations in 2002 as compared to $34 million in 2001 and $39 million in distributions from investments in InfraServ companies.

        Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment increased by $12 million to $203 million in 2002, compared to $191 million in 2001. The spending in 2002 included the start of construction on a new production facility for synthesis gas, a primary raw material at the Oberhausen site in Germany. In addition, major projects included the completion of the new GUR plant at the Bishop, Texas, facility and the capacity expansion for Vectra at Shelby, North Carolina. The Vectra expansion was needed to supply the projected long-term demand of the telecommunications industry and to develop and grow emerging markets.

        Net Cash Provided By/Used in Financing Activities.    Net cash used in financing activities was $108 million, $150 million and $337 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

        Net cash used in financing activities declined by $42 million to an outflow of $108 million in 2003 compared to 2002. This decrease is primarily related to lower net payments of short-term borrowings of $121 million, offset by net payments of long-term debt in 2003 of $48 million. In addition, in 2003, Celanese paid a cash dividend of $25 million, $0.48 per share, and repurchased 749,848 of its shares, to be held in treasury, for approximately $15 million.

        Net cash used in financing activities in 2002 was primarily due to net debt repayments aggregating $144 million. In addition, Celanese repurchased 284,798 of its shares, to be held in treasury, for approximately $6 million.



        Net cash used in financing activities amounted to $337 million in 2001. The net cash used in financing activities in 2001 was primarily due to net debt repayments aggregating $319 million. In addition, Celanese paid a cash dividend of $18 million, $0.35 per share, in 2001.

        The primary source of liquidity has been cash generated from operations, which included cash inflows from currency hedging activities. Historically, the primary liquidity requirements were for capital expenditures, working capital, pension contributions and investments. Our contractual obligations, commitments and debt service requirements over the next several years are significant and are substantially higher than historical amounts. Our primary source of liquidity will continue to be cash generated from operations as well as existing cash on hand. We have availability under existing credit facilities to assist, if required, in meeting our working capital needs and other contractual obligations.

        We expect to amend or refinance the senior credit facilities to fund the Acetex and Vinamul Polymers acquisitions. In addition, we will use the available sources of liquidity noted above to fund the purchase of the remaining outstanding shares of Celanese AG.

        We believe we will have available resources to meet both our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements, including debt service. If our cash flow from operations is insufficient to fund our debt service and other obligations, we may be forced to use other means available to us such as to increase our borrowings under our lines of credit, reduce or delay capital expenditures, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness.

        As of September 30, 2004, we had total debt of $3,100 million and cash and cash equivalents of $819 million. In connection with the acquisition of Celanese, we incurred a substantial amount of debt. We entered into senior subordinated bridge loans and issued $200 million of mandatorily redeemable preferred shares, both of which were subsequently refinanced by the senior subordinated notes and the floating rate term loan. Additionally, we issued senior discount notes and additional senior subordinated notes as well as entered into senior credit facilities.

        Also in connection with the acquisition, we agreed to pre-fund $463 million of certain pension obligations, which is expected to eliminate the need for future funding for seven to ten years. As of September 30, 2004, $105 million was pre-funded and we segregated $54 million of cash to be used exclusively for the pre-funding of non-qualified pension obligations. In October 2004, we pre-funded an additional $300 million.

        Celanese cancelled its existing committed commercial paper backup facilities and revolving credit lines. We are also renegotiating our $120 million trade receivable securitization program, which is currently not available.

        During 2004, we repaid approximately $235 million of Celanese's variable rate debt that was scheduled to mature in 2005, 2008 and 2009.

        After the closing of the offerings, we will have $200 million aggregate liquidation preference of outstanding preferred stock. Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if, declared by our board of directors, out of funds legally available therefor, cash dividends at the rate of    % of liquidation preference per annum, payable quarterly in arrears on            ,            ,             and            of each year commencing            , 2005. Dividends on the preferred stock will be cumulative from the date of initial issuance. The preferred stock will be convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time into share of our Series A common stock at a conversion rate of     shares of our Series A common stock per $25.00 liquidation preference of the preferred stock. See "Description of Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock."



        We were initially capitalized by equity contributions totaling $641 million from the Original Stockholders. On a stand alone basis, the Issuer and Crystal LLC have no material assets other than the stock of their subsidiaries that they own, and no independent external operations of its own apart from the financing. As such, the Issuer and Crystal LLC generally will depend on the cash flow of their subsidiaries to meet their obligations, including their obligations under the new preferred stock, the senior discount notes, senior subordinated notes, and any revolving credit borrowings and guarantees.

        Domination Agreement.    At the Celanese AG annual shareholders' meeting on June 15, 2004, Celanese AG shareholders approved payment of a dividend on the Celanese Shares for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of €0.12 per share. The Purchaser expects that no dividend will be paid to Celanese AG's shareholders on the Celanese Shares for the fiscal year ended on September 30, 2004. Accordingly, in the near term, the Issuer and BCP Crystal will use existing cash and borrowings from its subsidiaries, subject to various restrictions, including restrictions imposed by the senior credit facilities and indentures and by relevant provisions of German and other applicable laws, to make interest payments. If the Domination Agreement ceases to be operative, the ability of the Issuer and BCP Crystal to meet their obligations will be materially and adversely affected.

        In connection with the Domination Agreement becoming operative, we are required to offer cash compensation to minority shareholders to purchase their Celanese Shares for €41.92 per share, plus interest. Any minority shareholder who elects not to sell its shares to the Purchaser will be entitled to remain a shareholder of Celanese AG and to receive a gross guaranteed fixed annual payment on its shares (Ausgleich) of €3.27 per Celanese Share less certain corporate taxes in lieu of any future dividend. Taking into account the circumstances and the tax rates at the time of entering into the Domination Agreement, the net guaranteed fixed annual payment is €2.89 per share for a full fiscal year. If the Purchaser acquires all Celanese Shares outstanding as of September 30, 2004, the total amount of funds necessary to purchase such remaining outstanding shares would be €348 million plus accrued interest from October 2, 2004. The Purchaser intends to use a significant portion of its available cash to acquire the remaining outstanding shares.

        While the Domination Agreement is operative, the Purchaser will be required to compensate Celanese AG for any future annual loss incurred by Celanese AG at the end of the fiscal year when the loss was incurred. If the Purchaser were obligated to make cash payments to Celanese AG to cover an annual loss, it may not have sufficient funds to distribute to the Issuer to pay interest on the notes when due and, unless the Purchaser is able to obtain funds from a source other than annual profits of Celanese AG, the Purchaser may not be able to satisfy its obligation to fund such shortfall. For further information about the establishment and the consequences of the Domination Agreement, see "Risk Factors—The Purchaser may be required to compensate Celanese AG for annual losses, which may reduce the funds the Purchaser can otherwise make available to the Issuer."

        Contractual Obligations.    The following table sets forth our fixed contractual debt obligations as of September 30, 2004, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the Transactions, the Recent



Restructuring and the Concurrent Financings. BCP Crystal's obligations are guaranteed by Celanese Holdings.

Fixed Contractual Debt Obligations(1)

 Total
 Less Than
1 Year

 2-3
Years

 4-5
Years

 After
5 Years

 
 (in millions)

Senior Credit Facilities:               
 Term Loans Facility $1,556 $16 $31 $31 $1,478
Senior Subordinated Notes(2)  957        957
Senior Discount Notes(3)  554        554
Assumed Debt(4)  369  123  42  17  187
  
 
 
 
 
Total Fixed Contractual Debt Obligations $3,436 $139 $73 $48 $3,176
  
 
 
 
 

(1)
Excludes the following: Cash interest obligations on debt excluding the senior discount notes and any commitment and facility fees are approximately $190 million in the next year, $370 million in years two to three, $365 million in years four to five and $1,054 million after five years. Interest payments on the term loan facility were calculated using an assumed rate of 5.00% for all periods. No cash interest is payable on the senior discount notes in years one to five and $272 million cash interest is payable after five years.

(2)
Does not include $4 million of premium on the $225 million of the senior subordinated notes issued July 1, 2004.

(3)
Reflects the accreted value of the notes at maturity.

(4)
Does not include $2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt.

        Senior Credit Facilities.    The senior credit facilities of $1,219 million consist of a term loan facility, revolving credit facility, and a credit-linked revolving facility. The term loan facility consists of commitments of $456 million and €125 million, both maturing in 2011. As of September 30, 2004, we borrowed $391 million under the term loan facility. The revolving credit facility, through a syndication of banks, provides for borrowings of up to $380 million, including the availability of letters of credit in U.S. dollars and euros. As of September 30, 2004, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility which matures in 2009. The $228 million credit-linked revolving facility, which matures in 2009, includes borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and for borrowings on same-day notice. As of September 30, 2004, there were $172 million of letters of credit issued under the credit-linked revolving facility. As of December 31, 2004, $402 million was available for borrowing under the revolving credit facilities (taking into account letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facilities). The senior credit facilities are unconditionally guaranteed by Celanese Holdings and, subject to certain exceptions, by substantially all of its existing and future domestic subsidiaries, referred to as U.S. Guarantors. These facilities are secured by substantially all of the assets of Celanese Holdings and each U.S. Guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. The borrowings under the senior credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at Celanese Holdings' option, either a base rate or a LIBOR rate. The applicable margin for borrowing under the base rate option is 1.50% and for the LIBOR option, 2.50% (in each case, subject to a step-down based on a performance test).

        BCP Crystal is the borrower under the term loan facility and BCP Crystal and CAC are the borrowers under the revolving credit facilities. The term loan facility amortizes each year in an amount equal to 1% per annum in equal quarterly installments for the first six years and nine months, with the remaining amount payable on the date that is seven years from the date of the closing of the senior credit facilities. The senior credit facilities accrue interest, are subject to prepayment requirements and



contain the covenants, defaults and other provisions as set forth under "Description of Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facilities."

        In connection with the borrowing by BCP Crystal under the term loan portion of the senior credit facilities, BCP Crystal and CAC have entered into an intercompany loan agreement whereby BCP Crystal has agreed to lend the proceeds from any borrowings under its term loan facility to CAC. The intercompany loan agreement contains the same amortization provisions as the senior credit facilities. The interest rate with respect to the loans made under the intercompany loan agreement is the same as the interest rate with respect to the loans under BCP Crystal's term loan facility plus three basis points. BCP Crystal intends to service the indebtedness under its term loan facility with the proceeds of payments made to it by CAC under the intercompany loan agreement. Prior to the consummation of this offering, we expect to enter into the new senior credit facilities with a syndicate of financial institutions. We expect the terms of the new senior credit facilities to be substantially similar to the terms of our existing senior credit facilities. We expect to use borrowings under the new senior credit facilities to repay all amounts outstanding under the senior credit facilities.

        Floating Rate Term Loan.    The $350 million floating rate term loan matures in 2011. The borrowings under the floating rate term loan bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at BCP Crystal's option, either a base rate or a LIBOR rate. Prior to the completion of the Recent Restructuring, the applicable margin for borrowings under the base rate option was 3.25% and for the LIBOR option, 4.25%. Subsequent to the completion of the Recent Restructuring, the applicable margin for borrowings under the base rate option is 2.50% and for the LIBOR option, 3.50%. The floating rate term loan accrues interest, is subject to prepayment requirements and contains the covenants, defaults and other provisions as described under "Description of Indebtedness—Floating Rate Term Loan." We expect to use borrowings under the new senior credit facilities to repay all amounts outstanding under the floating rate term loan.

        Senior Subordinated Notes.    The senior subordinated notes consist of $1,225 million of 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 and €200 million of 103/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014. From the completion of the Recent Restructuring, all of BCP Crystal's U.S. domestic, wholly owned subsidiaries that guarantee BCP Crystal's obligations under the senior credit facilities guarantee the senior subordinated notes on an unsecured senior subordinated basis. We expect to use approximately $566 million of the net proceeds of the offering of our Series A common stock to redeem a portion of the senior subordinated notes.

        Senior Discount Notes.    In September 2004, Crystal US Holdings 3 L.L.C. ("Crystal LLC") and Crystal US Sub 3 Corp., a subsidiary of Crystal LLC, issued $853 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of their Senior Discount Notes due 2014 consisting of $163 million principal amount at maturity of their 10% Series A Senior Discount Notes due 2014 and $690 million principal amount at maturity of their 101/2% Series B Senior Discount Notes due 2014 (collectively, the "senior discount notes"). Until October 1, 2009, interest on the senior discount notes will accrue in the form of an increase in the accreted value of such notes. Cash interest on the senior discount notes will accrue commencing on October 1, 2009 and be payable semiannually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing April 1, 2010. We expect to use approximately $37 million of the net proceeds of the offering of our Series A common stock to redeem a portion of the Series A senior discount notes and $151 million to redeem a portion of the Series B senior discount notes and $19 million to pay the premium associated with such redemption.

        Assumed Debt.    As a result of the Transactions, Celanese prepaid, in April 2004, $175 million of debt scheduled to mature in 2005 and 2008 and, in September 2004, prepaid $58 million of additional debt previously scheduled to mature in 2009. The remaining assumed debt of $369 million, which does not include a $2 million reduction under purchase accounting, is primarily made up of fixed rate pollution control and industrial revenue bonds, short-term borrowings from affiliated companies and



capital lease obligations. Celanese canceled its revolving credit lines and is renegotiating its $120 million trade receivable securitization program, which is currently not available. Additionally, Celanese no longer has a commercial paper program.

        Covenants.    The indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes limit the ability of the issuers of such notes and the ability of their restricted subsidiaries to:

        Subject to certain exceptions, the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness.

        The senior credit facilities contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of Celanese Holdings and it subsidiaries' ability, to:

        In addition, the senior credit facilities require BCP Crystal to maintain the following financial covenants: a maximum total leverage ratio, a maximum bank debt leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation.

        The floating rate term loan contains restrictive covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, are substantially similar to the covenants under the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes, except for the covenant related to BCP Crystal's ability to create liens on assets, which is substantially similar to the related covenant in the senior credit facilities. In addition, the floating rate term loan requires BCP Crystal to maintain a maximum bank debt leverage ratio and, after completion of the Recent Restructuring, the following financial covenants: a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.


        The breach of covenants in the approximately $1.2 billion senior credit facilities that are tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA could result in a default under the senior credit facilities and the lenders could elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Any such acceleration would also result in a default under the indentures governing approximately $2.0 billion of the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes. Additionally, under the senior credit facilities, the floating rate term loan and the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes, our ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA. As of September 30, 2004, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.

        Covenant levels and ratios for the four quarters ended September 30, 2004 are as follows:

 
 Covenant
Level

 September 30, 2004
Ratios

 
Senior credit facility(1)     
Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio 1.7x4.4x
Maximum consolidated net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio 5.5x2.2x
Maximum consolidated net bank debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio 3.0x(5) 

Floating rate term loan(2)

 

 

 

 

 
Maximum consolidated net bank debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio 3.5x(5) 
Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio required to incur additional debt pursuant to ratio provisions 2.0x3.6x

Senior subordinated notes indenture(3)

 

 

 

 

 
Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio required to incur additional debt pursuant to ratio provisions 2.0x3.6x

Discount notes indenture(4)

 

 

 

 

 
Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio required to incur additional debt pursuant to ratio provisions 2.0x2.9x

(1)
The senior credit facilities require BCP Crystal to maintain an Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio starting at a minimum of 1.7x for the period April 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005, 1.8x for the period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006, 1.85x for the period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 and 2.0x thereafter; a consolidated net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio starting at a maximum of 5.5x for the period April 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005, 5.25x for the period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006, 5.00x for the period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 and 4.75x thereafter; and a consolidated net bank debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio at a maximum of 3.0x in each case for the most recent four quarter period. Failure to satisfy these ratio requirements would constitute a default under the senior credit facilities. If lenders under the senior credit facilities failed to waive any such default, repayment obligations under the senior credit facilities could be accelerated, which would also constitute a default under the indenture.

(2)
The floating rate term loan requires BCP Crystal to maintain a consolidated net bank debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio at a maximum of 3.5x for the most recent four quarter period. Following completion of the Recent Restructuring, the floating rate term loan also requires BCP Crystal to maintain a minimum Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio and a maximum consolidated net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio, in each case at levels that are less restrictive than those under the senior credit facilities. Failure to satisfy any of these ratio requirements would constitute a default under the floating rate term loan. If the lenders under the floating rate term loan failed to waive any such default, the repayment obligations under the floating rate term loan could be accelerated, which would also constitute a default under the indenture.

(3)
BCP Crystal's ability to incur additional debt and make certain restricted payments under the senior subordinated note indenture, subject to specified exceptions, is tied to an Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio of at least 2.0 to 1.

(4)
Crystal LLC's ability to incur additional debt and make certain restricted payments under the senior discount notes indenture, subject to specified exceptions, is tied to an Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio of at least 2.0 to 1.

(5)
Not meaningful as the consolidated net bank debt as of September 30, 2004 was less than zero.

        Adjusted EBITDA is used to determine compliance with many of the covenants contained in the indentures governing our outstanding notes and in the senior credit facilities. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude unusual items, non-cash items and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant compliance under our indentures and senior credit facility, as shown in the table below. We believe that the disclosure of the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA provides information that is useful to an investor's understanding of our liquidity and financial flexibility. See "Special Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures."

        Adjusted EBITDA as calculated under our senior credit facilities, the floating rate term loan and the indentures for the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes for the four quarters ended September 30, 2004 is as follows:

 
 Senior Credit Facilities
Floating Rate Term Loan
Senior Subordinated Notes

 Senior Discount
Notes

 
 
 (unaudited)(in millions)

 
Net (loss) of Celanese Corporation $(100)$(100)
Net loss of entities not included in covenant calculation(1)  51  50 
  
 
 
Net loss for covenant purposes  (49) (50)
Earnings from discontinued operations  (35) (35)
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles     
Interest expense net:       
 Interest expense  200  201 
 Interest income  (30) (30)
 Cash interest income used by captive insurance subsidiaries to fund operations  9  9 
Taxes:       
 Income tax provision (benefit)  75  75 
 Franchise taxes  1  1 
Depreciation and amortization  303  303 
Unusual items:       
 Special charges(2)       
  Insurance recoveries associated with plumbing cases  (2) (2)
  Sorbates antitrust matters     
  Restructuring, impairment and other special charges, net  102  102 
 Severance and other restructuring charges not included in special charges  41  41 
 Unusual and non-recurring items(3)  91  91 
Other non-cash charges (income):       
 Non-cash charges(4)  71  71 
 Equity in net earnings of affiliates in excess of cash dividends received  (15) (15)
 Excess of cash dividends paid to minority shareholders in subsidiaries over the minority interest income of these subsidiaries  1  1 
Other adjustments(5)       
 Advisor monitoring fee  5  5 
 Net gain on sale of assets  (2) (2)
Pro forma cost savings(6)  35  35 
  
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA $801 $801 
  
 
 

(1)
Includes $47 million ($46 million for the senior discount notes) of interest expense, $3 million of foreign currency expense recorded in other income (expense), net and $1 million elimination of intercompany interest income.

(2)
Special charges include provisions for restructuring and other expenses and income incurred outside the normal ongoing course of operations. Restructuring provisions represent costs related to severance and other benefit programs related to major activities undertaken to fundamentally redesign the business operations, as well as costs incurred in connection with a decision to exit non-strategic businesses. These measures are based on formal management decisions, establishment of agreements with the employees' representatives or individual agreements with the affected employees, as well as the public announcement of the restructuring plan. The related reserves reflect certain estimates, including those pertaining to separation costs, settlements of contractual obligations and other closure costs. We reassess the reserve requirements to complete each individual plan under existing restructuring programs at the end of each reporting period. Actual experience may be different from these estimates. (See note 25 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 14 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.)

(3)
Consists of the following: $47 million other (income) expense excluding dividend income (which consists of $36 million of foreign currency expense on intercompany loans and swaps; $5 million write-down of investments and $6 million of other miscellaneous non-recurring expenses); $19 million of stock appreciation rights expense; $12 million of employee contract termination expense; $11 million of transaction costs; and $2 million of expense for other miscellaneous non-recurring items.

(4)
Included in the amount above is $49 million of expense relating to our inventory step-up under purchase accounting; $19 million of amortization expense included in net periodic pension and OPEB cost; and $3 million of expense associated with Celanese's stock option plan. Items that were zero for the applicable period but are required to be included per our financing agreements are any reimbursed expenses and any non-cash portion of rent expenses.

(5)
Our financing agreements require us to make other adjustments to net earnings (loss) for net gain on sale of assets and fees paid to the Sponsor. Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt was zero for the applicable period but are required to be included per our financing agreements.

(6)
Our financing agreements also permit adjustments to net earnings (loss) on a pro forma basis for certain cost savings that we expect to achieve. We expect annual cost savings of approximately $37 million from pension pre-funding ($4 million of which is already reflected in the Issuer's actual results) and approximately $2 million from lower costs associated with publicly listed equity in Germany.

        Consolidated net debt is defined as total indebtedness, consisting of borrowed money and the deferred purchase price of property or services plus net cash for receivables financing less unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of our subsidiary Celanese Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Consolidated net bank debt is defined as consolidated net debt less all other indebtedness (other than capital leases) that is not secured in whole or in part by a first priority lien on



the assets of Celanese Holdings LLC and/or its subsidiaries. Consolidated net debt and consolidated net bank debt are calculated as follows as of September 30, 2004:

 
 (in millions)
 
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt—third party and affiliates $127 
Long-term debt  2,973 
  
 
Total consolidated debt of Celanese Corporation  3,100 
 Debt of entities not included in covenant calculation-senior discount notes.  (513)
 Less: cash and cash equivalents  (819)
  
 
Consolidated net debt  1,768 
 Senior subordinated notes  (1,479)
 Other indebtedness (other than capital leases) not secured by a lien on assets  (323)
  
 
Consolidated net bank debt $(34)
  
 

At September 30, 2004, fixed contractual cash obligations other than debt were as follows:

Fixed Contractual Cash Obligations

 Total
 Less than
1 Year

 2-3 Years
 4-5 Years
 After 5 Years
 
 (in millions)

Operating Leases $176 $41 $63 $33 $39
Unconditional Purchase Obligations  869  155  161  118  435
Other Contractual Obligations  159  23  136    
  
 
 
 
 
 Fixed Contractual Cash Obligations $1,204 $219 $360 $151 $474
  
 
 
 
 

        Unconditional Purchase Obligations include take or pay contracts and fixed price forward contracts. Celanese does not expect to incur any material losses under these contractual arrangements. In addition, these contracts may include variable price components.

        Other Contractual Obligations primarily includes committed capital spending and fines associated with the U.S. antitrust settlement described in note 23 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements. Included in Other Contractual Obligations is a €99 million fine from the European Commission related to antitrust matters in the sorbates industry, which is pending an appeal. Celanese is indemnified by a third party for 80% of the expenses relating to these matters.

        At September 30, 2004, Celanese had contractual guarantees and commitments as follows:

 
  
 Expiration per Period
Contractual Guarantees and Commitments

 Total
 Less than 1 Year
 2-3 Years
 4-5 Years
 After 5 Years
 
 (in millions)

Financial Guarantees $57 $7 $14 $15 $21
Standby Letters of Credit  178  178      
  
 
 
 
 
Contractual Guarantees and Commitments $235 $185 $14 $15 $21
  
 
 
 
 

        Celanese is secondarily liable under a lease agreement pursuant to which Celanese has assigned a direct obligation to a third party. The lease assumed by the third party expires on April 30, 2012. The lease liability for the period from September 30, 2004 to April 30, 2012 is estimated to be approximately $57 million. Standby letters of credit of $178 million at September 30, 2004 are irrevocable obligations of an issuing bank that ensure payment to third parties in the event that certain Celanese subsidiaries fail to perform in accordance with specified contractual obligations. The



likelihood is remote that material payments will be required under these agreements. The stand-by letters of credit include $172 million issued under the credit-linked revolving facility.

        For additional commitments and contingencies see note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Although we cannot predict with certainty the annual spending for these matters, such matters will affect our future cash flows.

Other Obligations

 Predecessor 2003
Actual Spending

 Predecessor
Spending for
Three months ended
March 31, 2004

 Successor
Spending for
Six months ended
September 30, 2004

 2004 Remaining
Projected Spending

Environmental Matters $80 $22 $41 $21
Pension and Other Benefits  219  48  157  387
Plumbing Actions and Sorbates Litigation(1)  15  3  7  1
  
 
 
 
 Other Obligations $314 $73 $205 $409
  
 
 
 

(1)
Remaining spending in 2004 related to the sorbates litigation cannot be reasonably estimated. Receipts associated with the plumbing actions and sorbates litigation were $10 million and $125 million, plus interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Cash receipts of $35 million associated with the plumbing litigation were received from an insurance carrier in the fourth quarter of 2004.

        In the first nine months of 2004 and in the year ended December 31, 2003, worldwide expenditures, including expenditures for legal compliance, internal environmental initiatives and remediation of active, orphan, divested and U.S. Superfund sites, were $63 million and $80 million, respectively. Environmental reserves for remediation matters were $147 million as of September 30, 2004. (See notes 15 and 17 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        It is anticipated that stringent environmental regulations will continue to be imposed on the chemical industry in general. Although we cannot predict with certainty future environmental expenditures, especially expenditures beyond 2004, due to new air regulations in the U.S., there will be a temporary increase in compliance costs in 2005-2007 which could be significant depending on the outcome of challenges to aspects of those regulations.

        Due to its industrial history, Celanese has the obligation to remediate specific areas on its active sites as well as on divested, orphan or U.S. Superfund sites. In addition, as part of the demerger agreement with Hoechst, a specified proportion of the responsibility for environmental liabilities from a number of pre-demerger divestitures was transferred to Celanese. Celanese has provided for such obligations when the event of loss is probable and reasonably estimable. Management believes that the environmental costs will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, but they may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or cash flows in any given accounting period. (See note 24 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        The funding policy for pension plans is to accumulate plan assets that, over the long run, will approximate the present value of projected benefit obligations. In the first nine months of 2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, pension contributions to the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan amounted to $33 million, $130 million and $100 million, respectively.


Contributions to the German pension plans for the first nine months of 2004 were $105 million. Also in the first nine months of 2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, payments to other non-qualified plans totaled $19 million, $24 million and $14 million, respectively.

        Spending associated with other benefit plans, primarily retiree medical, defined contribution and long-term disability, amounted to $48 million, $65 million and $61 million in the first nine months of 2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Spending is expected to continue at comparable levels in 2004. (See note 10 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        In connection with the acquisition of Celanese AG, we agreed to pre-fund $463 million of certain pension obligations, which is expected to eliminate the need for future funding for seven to ten years. As of September 30, 2004, $105 million was pre-funded and we have segregated $54 million of cash to be used exclusively for the pre-funding of non-qualified pension obligations. In October 2004, we pre-funded an additional $300 million.

        Celanese is involved in a number of legal proceedings and claims incidental to the normal conduct of its business. In the first nine months of 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2003, there were net cash inflows of approximately zero and $110 million, respectively, in connection with the plumbing actions and sorbates litigation. As of September 30, 2004, there were reserves of $205 million for these matters. In addition, there were receivables from insurance companies and Hoechst in connection with the plumbing and sorbates matters of $170 million as of September 30, 2004.

        Although it is impossible at this time to determine with certainty the ultimate outcome of these matters, management believes that adequate provisions have been made and that the ultimate outcome will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, but could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or cash flows in any given accounting period. (See note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        Capital expenditures were $150 million and $211 million in the first nine months of 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003, respectively.

        These capital expenditures primarily related to the completion of a production facility for synthesis gas, a primary raw material at the Oberhausen site in Germany, major replacements of equipment, capacity expansions, major investments to reduce future operating costs, environmental, health and safety initiatives and the integration of a company-wide SAP platform. Capital expenditures remained below depreciation levels as we continued to make selective capital investments to enhance the market positions of its products.

        Capital expenditures were financed principally with cash from operations. We anticipate spending in 2004 to be between 75% and 85% of depreciation expense in 2003.

        In connection with the Transactions, we are in the process of formulating a plan to exit or restructure certain activities. We have not completed the analysis, but at September 30, 2004, we have recorded initial purchase accounting liabilities of $17 million, primarily for employee severance and related costs in connection with our preliminary plan to exit or restructure certain activities. In October 2004, we announced plans to implement a strategic restructuring of our acetate business. The restructuring is expected to result in significant severance payments.


Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

        We are exposed to market risk through commercial and financial operations. Our market risk consists principally of exposure to currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. The Predecessor has in place policies of hedging against changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices as described below. We intend to adopt the Predecessor's written policies regarding the use of derivative financial instruments. These policies are expected to be similar to those historically maintained by Celanese. These contracts are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities and SFAS No. 148, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. (See note 22 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        We and the Predecessor have receivables and payables denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies of the various subsidiaries, which create foreign exchange risk. For the purposes of this prospectus, the Predecessor's reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, the legal reporting currency of Celanese continues to be the euro. With the introduction of the euro on January 1, 1999, the exposure to exchange rate fluctuations is eliminated in relation to the euro zone countries that have adopted the euro as their common currency, leaving the U.S. dollar, the euro, Mexican peso, Japanese yen, British pound sterling, and Canadian dollar as the most significant sources of currency risk. Accordingly, we enter into foreign currency forwards and options to minimize our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. The foreign currency contracts are designated for recognized assets and liabilities and forecasted transactions. The terms of these contracts are generally under one year. The Predecessor's centralized hedging strategy states that foreign currency denominated receivables or liabilities recorded by the operating entities will be used to hedge the exposure on a consolidated basis. As a result, foreign currency forward contracts relating to this centralized strategy did not meet the criteria of SFAS No. 133 to qualify for hedge accounting. Accordingly, these contracts are accounted for as fair value hedges. Net foreign currency transaction gains or losses are recognized on the underlying transactions, which are offset by losses and gains related to foreign currency forward contracts.

        The Predecessor had contracts with net notional amounts totaling approximately $1,136 million, $765 million and $1,002 million at March 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which were denominated mainly in U.S. dollars, British pound sterling, Japanese yen, and Canadian dollars. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, foreign currency forward contracts, designated as cash flow hedges, resulted in a decrease in total assets of $29 million and a decrease in total liabilities of $1 million. During 2003, the Predecessor's foreign currency forward contracts, designated as fair value hedges, resulted in a decrease in total assets of $8 million and an increase in total liabilities of $1 million. As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, these contracts hedged a portion (approximately 85% as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003) of dollar denominated intercompany net receivables held by euro denominated entities. Related to the unhedged portion, a net gain of approximately $4 million and a net loss of approximately $14 million from foreign exchange gains or losses was recorded to other income, net and interest and other income, net in the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Predecessor hedged all of its dollar denominated intercompany net receivables held by euro denominated entities. Therefore, there was no material net effect from foreign exchange gains or losses in interest and other income, net. Hedging activities related to intercompany net receivables yielded cash flows from operating activities of approximately $180 million, $95 million and $14 million, in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and approximately $0 million and $73 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.



        In addition to the swap arrangement entered into by BCP Crystal as described below, we had contracts with notional amounts totaling approximately $618 million at September 30, 2004, which were denominated mainly in U.S. dollars, British pound sterling, Japanese yen, and Canadian dollars. During the six months ended September 30, 2004, foreign currency forward contracts, designated as cash flow hedges, resulted in a decrease in total assets of $4 million and a decrease in total liabilities of $2 million. As of September 30, 2004 these contracts hedged a portion (approximately 81%) of dollar denominated intercompany net receivables held by euro denominated entities. Related to the unhedged portion, a net loss of approximately $2 million from foreign exchange gains or losses was recorded to other income, net in the six months ended September 30, 2004. Hedging activities related to intercompany net receivables yielded cash flows from operating activities of approximately $15 million for the six months ended September 30, 2004.

        On June 16, 2004, as part of our currency risk management, BCP Crystal entered into a currency swap with certain financial institutions. Under the terms of the swap arrangement, BCP Crystal will pay approximately €13 million in interest and receive approximately $16 million in interest on each June 15 and December 15 (with interest for the first period prorated). Upon maturity of the swap agreement on June 16, 2008, BCP Crystal will pay approximately €276 million and receive $333 million. BCP Crystal has designated the swap as a cash flow hedge of a euro denominated intercompany loan. During the six months ended September 30, 2004, the effects of the swap resulted in an increase in total liabilities and shareholders' equity of $9 million and $1 million net of related income tax of $1 million, respectively.

        A substantial portion of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses is denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollar, principally the euro. Fluctuations in the value of these currencies against the U.S. dollar, particularly the value of the euro, can have, and in the past have had, a direct and material impact on the business and financial results. For example, a decline in the value of the euro versus the U.S. dollar, results in a decline in the U.S. dollar value of our sales denominated in euros and earnings due to translation effects. Likewise, an increase in the value of the euro versus the U.S. dollar would result in an opposite effect. Celanese estimates that the translation effects of changes in the value of other currencies against the U.S. dollar increased net sales by approximately 4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, 7% for the year ended December 31, 2003 and increased net sales by approximately 2% in 2002. The Predecessor estimates that the translation effects of changes in the value of other currencies against the U.S. dollar had minimal impact on total assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and increased total assets by approximately 5% in 2003. Exposure to transactional effects is further reduced by a high degree of overlap between the currencies in which sales are denominated and the currencies in which the raw material and other costs of goods sold are denominated.

        The Predecessor entered into interest rate swap agreements to reduce the exposure of interest rate risk inherent in its outstanding debt by locking in borrowing rates to achieve a desired level of fixed/floating rate debt depending on market conditions. The Predecessor had open interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $200 million at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and $300 million at December 31, 2002. In the second quarter of 2004, we recorded a loss of less than $1 million in other income, net, associated with the early termination of its $200 million interest rate swap. At September 30, 2004, we had no interest rate swap agreements in place. The Predecessor recognized net interest expense from hedging activities relating to interest rate swaps of $2 million and $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Net interest expense from hedging activities relating to interest rate swaps was recognized in the amounts of $1 million and $5 million for the six months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Predecessor recognized net interest expense from hedging activities relating to interest rate swaps of $11 million in 2003 and $12 million in 2002. During 2003, the Predecessor's interest rate swaps, designated as cash flow hedges,


resulted in a decrease in total assets and total liabilities and an increase in shareholders' equity of $4 million, $14 million and $7 million, net of related income tax of $4 million, respectively. There was no significant gain or loss recorded related to the ineffective portion of the interest rate swaps for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. During 2003, the Predecessor recorded a net gain of $2 million in interest and other income, net, for the ineffective portion of the interest rate swaps. During 2003, the Predecessor recorded a loss of $7 million in interest and other income, net, associated with the early termination of one of its interest rate swaps. During 2002, the Predecessor's interest rate swaps resulted in an increase in total assets and total liabilities and a decrease in shareholders' equity of $4 million, $17 million and $8 million, net of related income tax of $4 million, respectively. Celanese recorded a net loss of $3 million and $5 million in interest and other income, net for the ineffective portion of the interest rate swaps, during the years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.

        On a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2004, we had $1,656 million of variable rate debt. A 1% increase in interest rates would increase annual interest expense by approximately $17 million.

        Our and the Predecessor's policy for the majority of our natural gas and butane requirements allows entering into supply agreements and forward purchase or cash-settled swap contracts, generally for up to 24 months. During the first nine months of 2004, there were no forward contracts for our butane requirements and, for natural gas, we had positions covering about 35% of our North American Chemical Products segment requirements primarily as a result of forward contracts entered into in 2003. In the future, we may modify our practice of purchasing a portion of our commodity requirements forward, and consider utilizing a variety of other raw material hedging instruments in addition to forward purchase contracts in accordance with changes in market conditions. The fixed price natural gas forward contracts are principally settled through actual delivery of the physical commodity. The maturities of the cash-settled swap contracts correlate to the actual purchases of the commodity and have the effect of securing predetermined prices for the underlying commodity. Although these contracts are structured to limit our exposure to increases in commodity prices, they can also limit the potential benefit we might have otherwise received from decreases in commodity prices. These cash-settled swap contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Realized gains and losses on these contracts are included in the cost of the commodity upon settlement of the contract. The Predecessor recognized a loss of $1 million and a gain of $1 million from its derivative contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. A loss of less than $1 million and $3 million from derivative contracts was recognized for the six months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Predecessor recognized losses of $3 million and less than $1 million from natural gas and butane contracts in 2003 and 2002, respectively. There was no material impact on the balance sheet at September 30, 2004, March 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002. The effective portion of unrealized gains and losses associated with the cash-settled swap contracts are $0 million as of September 30, 2004, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and $1 million as of December 31, 2002. These amounts are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying hedged transactions are reported in earnings. There were open swaps with a notional amount of $0 million as of September 30, 2004 and March 31, 2004 and $5 million as of December 31, 2003.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        Our management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and estimates and is finalizing its evaluation of our accounting policies and may determine that different policies are preferable in the future. The critical accounting policies adopted by us are as follows:

        Our and the Predecessor's consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies. The preparation of these financial statements and application of these policies requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. However, we are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would result in materially different results.

        We believe the following accounting polices and estimates are critical to understanding the financial reporting risks present in the current economic environment. These matters, and the judgments and uncertainties affecting them, are also essential to understanding our reported and future operating results. See note 3 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 4 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for a more comprehensive discussion of the significant accounting policies.

        Our business is capital intensive and has required, and will continue to require, significant investments in property, plant and equipment. At September 30, 2004, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment was $1,948 million, $1,649 million and $1,710 million, respectively. As discussed in note 3 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 4 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, we and the Predecessor assess the recoverability of property, plant and equipment to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or group of assets. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

        As a result of the planned consolidation of tow production and the termination of filament production, the Acetate Products segment recorded impairment charges of $50 million associated with plant and equipment in the six months ended September 30, 2004.

        We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level based on a two-step approach. First, the carrying amount of the reporting unit is compared to the fair value as estimated by the future net discounted cash flows expected to be generated by the reporting unit. To the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, a second step is performed, wherein the reporting unit's assets and liabilities are fair valued. The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated as the fair value of the reporting unit in excess of the fair value of all non-goodwill assets and liabilities allocated to the reporting unit. To the extent that the reporting unit's carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, impairment exists and must be recognized. As of September 30, 2004, the Company had $934 million of goodwill and other intangible assets.

        During 2003, the Predecessor performed the annual impairment test of goodwill and determined that there was no impairment. As a result of the tender offer price of €32.50 per share announced on December 16, 2003, which would place an implicit value on Celanese at an amount below book value of the net assets, the Predecessor initiated an impairment analysis in accordance with SFAS No. 142. The impairment analysis was prepared on a reporting unit level and utilized the most recent cash flow, discount rate and growth rate assumptions. Based on the resulting analysis, the Predecessor's management concluded that goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2003.


        As of March 31, 2004 and September 30, 2004, no significant changes in the underlying business assumptions or circumstances that drive the impairment analysis led Celanese or us to believe goodwill might have been impaired. We will continue to evaluate the need for impairment if changes in circumstances or available information indicate that impairment may have occurred.

        A prolonged general economic downturn and, specifically, a continued downturn in the chemical industry as well as other market factors could intensify competitive pricing pressure, create an imbalance of industry supply and demand, or otherwise diminish volumes or profits. Such events, combined with changes in interest rates, could adversely affect estimates of future net cash flows to be generated by our long-lived assets. Consequently, it is possible that future operating results could be materially and adversely affected by additional impairment charges related to the recoverability of long-lived assets.

        Special charges include provisions for restructuring and other expenses and income incurred outside the normal ongoing course of operations. Restructuring provisions represent costs related to severance and other benefit programs related to major activities undertaken to fundamentally redesign the business operations as well as costs incurred in connection with a decision to exit non-strategic businesses. These measures are based on formal management decisions, establishment of agreements with the employees' representatives or individual agreements with the affected employees as well as the public announcement of the restructuring plan. The related reserves reflect certain estimates, including those pertaining to separation costs, settlements of contractual obligations and other closure costs. We reassess the reserve requirements to complete each individual plan under existing restructuring programs at the end of each reporting period. Actual experience has been and may continue to be different from these estimates. (See note 25 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 14 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        We manufacture and sell a diverse line of chemical products throughout the world. Accordingly, the businesses' operations are subject to various hazards incidental to the production of industrial chemicals including the use, handling, processing, storage and transportation of hazardous materials. We recognize losses and accrue liabilities relating to environmental matters if available information indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss is reasonably estimated. If the event of loss is neither probable nor reasonably estimable, but is reasonably possible, appropriate disclosure is provided in the notes to its consolidated financial statements if the contingency is material.

        Total reserves for environmental liabilities were $147 million, $153 million and $159 million at September 30, 2004, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Measurement of environmental reserves is based on the evaluation of currently available information with respect to each individual site and considers factors such as existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations and prior experience in remediation of contaminated sites. An environmental reserve related to cleanup of a contaminated site might include, for example, provision for one or more of the following types of costs: site investigation and testing costs, cleanup costs, costs related to soil and water contamination resulting from tank ruptures and post-remediation monitoring costs. These reserves do not take into account any claims or recoveries from insurance. There are no pending insurance claims for any environmental liability that are expected to be material. The measurement of environmental liabilities is based on a range of management's periodic estimate of what it will cost to perform each of the elements of the remediation effort. We use our best estimate within the range to establish our environmental reserves. We utilize third parties to assist in the management and the development of our cost estimates for our sites. Changes to environmental regulations or other factors



affecting environmental liabilities are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period in which they occur. We accrue for legal fees related to litigation matters when the costs associated with defense can be reasonably estimated and are probable to occur. All other fees are expensed as incurred. (See note 24 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        We, as of September 30, 2004, and the Predecessor, as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, had reserves for asset retirement obligations of $61 million, $48 million and $47 million, respectively. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred. The liability is measured at the discounted fair value and is adjusted to its present value in subsequent periods as accretion expense is recorded. The corresponding asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. We have identified but not recognized asset retirement obligations related to substantially all our existing operating facilities. Examples of these types of obligations include demolition, decommissioning, disposal and restoration activities. Legal obligations exist in connection with the retirement of these assets upon closure of the facilities or abandonment of the existing operations. However, operations at these facilities are expected to continue indefinitely and therefore a reasonable estimate of fair value cannot be determined at this time. In the future, we will assess strategies of the businesses acquired and may support decisions that differ from past decisions of the Predecessor's management regarding the continuing operations of existing facilities. Asset retirement obligations will be recorded if these strategies are changed and probabilities of closure are assigned to existing facilities. If certain operating facilities were to close, the related asset retirement obligations could significantly effect our results of operations and cash flows.

        In accordance with SFAS No. 143, the Acetate Products segment recorded a charge of $8 million, included within 2003 depreciation expense, related to potential asset retirement obligations, as a result of a worldwide assessment of our acetate production capacity. The assessment concluded that there was a probability that certain facilities would be closed in the latter half of the decade. In October 2004 we announced plans to consolidate flake and tow production by early 2007 and to discontinue production of filament by mid-2005. The restructuring will result in the discontinuance of acetate production at two sites, as such, we recorded a charge of $12 million included within depreciation expense, of which $8 million was recorded by the Acetate Products segment and $4 million by the Chemical Products segment, for the six months ended September 30, 2004.

        Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities) were approximately $(126) million, $576 million and $555 million at September 30, 2004, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Management regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, applicable tax strategies, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Such evaluations require significant management judgments. Valuation allowances have been established primarily for U.S. deferred tax assets, German income tax loss carryforwards and Mexican net operating loss carryforwards.

        On April 6, 2004, the closing date of the Tender Offer, Celanese had approximately $576 million in net deferred tax assets, of which $531 million were in the U.S., including $173 million arising from U.S. net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. Under U.S. tax law, the utilization of deferred tax assets related to NOL carryforwards is subject to an annual limitation if there is a more than 50 percentage point change in shareholder ownership. The acceptance of the Tender Offer triggered this limitation (which may be subject to adjustment). As a result of this limitation and the Recent Restructuring, a



valuation allowance was established against the deferred tax asset attributable to the U.S. NOL carryforwards at the closing date of the Tender Offer. In addition, as a result of the Recent Restructuring, including the transfer of CAC to BCP Crystal, we determined that it was no longer more likely than not that we would realize our other net U.S. deferred tax assets. Accordingly, we recorded a full valuation allowance on our $294 million of other net pre-acquisition U.S. deferred tax assets (reduced by deferred tax liabilities) with a corresponding increase in goodwill. In addition, the valuation allowance on U.S. deferred assets was increased by $12 million through a charge to tax expense, and $13 million through a reduction in minority interest liability, respectively, during the six months ended September 30, 2004 related to activity subsequent to the closing date of the Tender Offer. Management is currently reviewing the impact of the Tender Offer and whether it will have an impact on other deferred tax assets outside the U.S. The finalization of this assessment could result in adjustments to current and deferred tax assets liabilities.

        As a result of the conclusion of an income tax examination for the tax audit period ending December 31, 2000 and the receipt of the final tax and interest assessment, the Company reversed accrued income tax reserves attributable to that period. This resulted in a decrease in income taxes payable and goodwill of $113 million as it was a purchase accounting adjustment.

        Pension and other postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements are sponsored by CAC, our subsidiary. With respect to its U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan, minimum funding requirements are determined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. For the periods presented, the Predecessor has not been required to contribute under these minimum funding requirements. However, the Predecessor chose to contribute $130 million, $100 million, and $142 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $33 million and $98 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively. Benefits are generally based on years of service and/or compensation. Various assumptions are used in the calculation of the actuarial valuation of the employee benefit plans. These assumptions include the weighted average discount rate, rates of increase in compensation levels, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and increases or trends in health care costs. In addition to the above mentioned assumptions, actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate the projected benefit obligation. The actuarial assumptions used to estimate the projected benefit obligation may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of pension expense recorded by us in future periods.

        The amounts recognized in our and the Predecessor's consolidated financial statements related to pension and postretirement benefits are determined on an actuarial basis. A significant assumption used in determining pension expense is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. At September 30, 2004 we assumed an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.5% for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan. In 2003, the Predecessor assumed an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 9.0% for its U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan, reflecting the generally expected moderation of long-term rates of return in the financial markets. The U.S. qualified defined benefit plan represents greater than 90 percent and 80 percent of the pension plan assets and liabilities, respectively. On average, the actual return on plan assets over the long-term (15 to 20 years) has substantially exceeded 9.0%. In 2003, the plans experienced market related returns as compared to losses in 2002.

        For 2003, the Predecessor's expected long-term rate of return assumption for its U.S. plans remained at 9.0%. A 25 basis point decline in the expected long-term rate of return for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan is expected to increase pension expense by an estimated



$5 million in 2004. Another estimate that affects pension and postretirement benefit expense is the discount rate used in the annual actuarial valuations of pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations. At the end of each year, Management determines the appropriate discount rate, which represents the interest rate that should be used to determine the present value of future cash flows currently expected to be required to settle the pension and postretirement benefit obligations. The discount rate is generally based on the yield on high-quality corporate fixed-income securities. At September 30, 2004 and at December 31, 2003, the discount rate of the U.S. plans for the Successor and Predecessor, respectively, was 6.00% and 6.25%, respectively. At December 31, 2002 the discount rate was 6.75% for the U.S. plans. At December 31, 2003, a 50 basis point decline in the discount rate for the U.S. pension and postretirement medical plans is estimated to increase pension and postretirement benefit expense in 2004 by approximately $5 million and less than $1 million, respectively, and the liabilities by approximately $130 million and approximately $13 million, respectively.

        Additionally, other postretirement benefit plans provide medical and life insurance benefits to retirees who meet minimum age and service requirements. The postretirement benefit cost for 2003 and 2002 was $35 million and $39 million, respectively, and the accrued post-retirement liability was $320 million and $326 million, respectively. The post-retirement benefit cost was $22 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and $25 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, and the accrued post-retirement liability was $311 million at September 30, 2004. The key determinants of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ("APBO") are the discount rate and the healthcare cost trend rate. The healthcare cost trend rate has a significant effect on the reported amounts of APBO and related expense. For example, as estimated at December 31, 2003, increasing the healthcare cost trend rate by one percentage point in each year would increase the APBO at December 31, 2003, and the 2003 postretirement benefit cost by approximately $1 million and less than $1 million, and decreasing the healthcare cost trend rate by one percentage point in each year would decrease the APBO at December 31, 2003 and the 2003 postretirement benefit cost by approximately $2 million and less than $1 million, respectively. (See Note 18 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 10 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        We are subject to a number of lawsuits, claims, and investigations, incidental to the normal conduct of our business, relating to and including product liability, patent and intellectual property, commercial, contract, antitrust, and employment matters, which are handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. (See note 23 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.) Management routinely assesses the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as ranges of probable and reasonably estimable losses. Reasonable estimates involve judgments made by management after considering a broad range of information including: notifications, demands, settlements which have been received from a regulatory authority or private party, available facts, identification of other potentially responsible parties and their ability to contribute, as well as prior experience. A determination of the amount of loss contingency required, if any, is assessed in accordance with SFAS No. 5 "Contingencies and Commitments" and recorded if probable and estimable after careful analysis of each individual matter. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter and as additional information becomes available.

        CNA Holdings, Inc. ("CNA Holdings"), a U.S. subsidiary of ours and the Predecessor, which includes the U.S. business now conducted by Ticona, along with Shell Chemical Company ("Shell") and E. I. du Pont de Nemours ("DuPont"), among others, have been the defendants in a series of lawsuits, alleging that plastics manufactured by these companies that were utilized in the production of plumbing systems for residential property were defective or caused such plumbing systems to fail. CNA Holdings



has accrued its best estimate of its share of the plumbing actions. At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, accruals were $74 million and $76 million, respectively, for this matter, of which $12 million and $14 million, respectively, are included in current liabilities. Management believes that the plumbing actions are adequately provided for in the consolidated financial statements. However, if we were to incur an additional charge for this matter, such a charge would not be expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, but may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in any given accounting period. The Predecessor's receivables relating to the anticipated recoveries from third party insurance carriers for this product liability matter are based on the probability of collection on the settlement agreements reached with a majority of the insurance carriers whose coverage level exceeds the receivables and based on the status of current discussions with other insurance carriers. As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, insurance claims receivables were $65 million and $63 million, respectively. Collectibility could vary depending on the financial status of the insurance carriers. In 2003, the Predecessor recorded income from special charges of $107 million and interest income of $20 million, related to settlements from insurers in excess of the recorded receivable amounts. (See note 23 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        Nutrinova Inc., a U.S. subsidiary of Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours and the Predecessor, is party to various legal proceedings in the United States, Canada and Europe alleging Nutrinova Inc. engaged in unlawful, anticompetitive behavior which affected the sorbates markets while it was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hoechst. In accordance with the demerger agreement between Hoechst and Celanese, which became effective October 1999, Celanese, the successor to Hoechst's sorbates business, was assigned the obligation related to these matters. However, Hoechst agreed to indemnify Celanese for 80 percent of payments for such obligations. Expenses related to this matter are recorded gross of any such recoveries from Hoechst while the recoveries from Hoechst, which represents 80 percent of such expenses, are recorded directly to shareholders' equity, net of tax, as a contribution of capital.

        Based on a review of the existing facts and circumstances relating to the sorbates matter, including the status of governmental investigations, as well as civil claims filed and settled, we and the Predecessor had remaining accruals of $131 million and $137 million at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, for the estimated loss relative to this matter. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty, management's best estimate of the range of possible additional future losses and fines, including any that may result from governmental proceedings, as of September 30, 2004 is between $0 and $9 million. The estimated range of such possible future losses is management's best estimate taking into consideration potential fines and claims, both civil and criminal, that may be imposed or made in other jurisdictions. At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we and the Predecessor had receivables, recorded within current assets, relating to the sorbates indemnification from Hoechst of $105 million and $110 million, respectively. (See Note 23 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.)

        We and the Predecessor consolidate two wholly owned insurance companies (the "Captives"). The Captives are a key component of our global risk management program as well as a form of self-insurance for property, liability and workers' compensation risks. The Captives issue insurance policies to Predecessor subsidiaries to provide consistent coverage amid fluctuating costs in the insurance market and to lower long-term insurance costs by avoiding or reducing commercial carrier overhead and regulatory fees. The Captives issue insurance policies and coordinate claims handling services with third party service providers. They retain risk at levels approved by the Board of


Management and obtain reinsurance coverage from third parties to limit the net risk retained. One of the Captives also insures certain third party risks.

        The assets of the Captives consist primarily of marketable securities and reinsurance receivables. Marketable securities values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. The carrying value of the amounts recoverable under the reinsurance agreements approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.

        The liabilities recorded by the Captives relate to the estimated risk of loss recorded by the Captives, which is based on management estimates and actuarial valuations, and unearned premiums, which represent the portion of the premiums written applicable to the terms of the policies in force. The establishment of the provision for outstanding losses is based upon known facts and interpretation of circumstances influenced by a variety of factors. In establishing a provision, management considers facts currently known and the current state of laws and litigation where applicable. Liabilities are recognized for known claims when sufficient information has been developed to indicate involvement of a specific policy and management can reasonably estimate their liability. In addition, liabilities have been established to cover additional exposure on both known and unasserted claims. Estimates of the liabilities are reviewed and updated regularly. It is possible that actual results could differ significantly from the recorded liabilities.

        The Captives use reinsurance arrangements to reduce their risk of loss. Reinsurance arrangements however do not relieve the Captives from their obligations to policyholders. Failure of the reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to the Captives. The Captives evaluate the financial condition of their reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk to minimize their exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies and establish allowances for amounts deemed non-collectable.

        Premiums written are recognized based on the terms of the policies. Capitalization of the Captives is determined by regulatory guidelines. As of September 30, 2004, the net retained concurrent aggregate risk of all policies written by the Captives, after reinsuring higher tier risks with third party insurance companies, net of established reserves, amounted to approximately $516 million. This amount of exposure is further offset by the underlying equity of the Captives amounting to approximately $370 million at September 30, 2004.



INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

        We are a leading player in the basic chemicals and specialty chemicals markets. We compete in four primary markets: Chemical Products, Acetate Products, Technical Polymers Ticona and Performance Products.

Chemical Products

        We participate in the basic chemicals market through our sales of acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer, as well as our significant presence in acetyl derivatives. We also produce higher value-added acetyl based products, such as polyvinyl alcohol and emulsions. The Chemical Products segment consists of six business lines: Acetyls, Acetyl Derivatives and Polyols, Polyvinyl Alcohol, Emulsions, Specialties and other chemical activities.

        Acetic acid is a global, mature product that is primarily used for the production of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) as well as purified terephthalic acid solvent and acetic anhydride. The 2003 global demand was approximately 7.3 million metric tons served by a few, large producers, according to Tecnon and our estimates. Future demand for acetic acid largely depends on manufacturing growth in VAM and purified terephthalic acid, a precursor material for manufacturing polyester, and is expected to grow approximately 3-4% per annum on a global basis. Asia is projected to become an increasingly important player in acetic acid production and currently represents approximately one third of total production capacity. We have begun preparations to build a 600,000 metric ton per year acetic acid plant in Nanjing, China, with production anticipated to begin in late 2006 or early 2007. We are a leading global producer of acetic acid according to the Tecnon Orbichem Survey.

        Global demand for VAM in 2003 was estimated to be 4.4 million metric tons and is expected to grow 3-4% per annum, according to Tecnon and our estimates. VAM is used in a variety of adhesives, paints, films, coatings and textiles. We are the world's leading producer of VAM according to the Tecnon Orbichem Survey.

        Acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer, like other commodity products, are characterized by cyclicality in pricing. The principal raw materials in these products are natural gas and ethylene, which are purchased from numerous sources; carbon monoxide, which we purchase under long-term contracts; methanol, which we both manufacture and purchase under short-term contracts; and butane, which we purchase from several suppliers. All these raw materials, except carbon monoxide, are themselves commodities and are available from a wide variety of sources. We intend to purchase most of our North American methanol requirements from Southern Chemical Corporation beginning in 2005 under a multi-year agreement.

        Our acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer businesses are global and have several large customers. Generally, we supply these global customers under multi-year contracts. The customers of acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer produce polymers used in water-based paints, adhesives, paper coatings, film modifiers and textiles.

        Other products include acetic anhydride, a raw material used in the production of cellulose acetate, detergents and pharmaceuticals and acetaldehyde, a major feedstock for the production of polyols. Acetaldehyde is also used in other organic compounds such as pyridines, which are used in agricultural products.

        The acetyl derivatives and polyols business line produces a variety of solvents, polyols, formaldehyde and other chemicals, which in turn are used in the manufacture of paints, coatings,


adhesives, and other products. Many acetyl derivatives products are derived from our production of acetic acid and oxo alcohols.

      �� Acetyl derivatives and polyols are commodity products characterized by cyclicality in pricing. The principal raw materials used in the acetyl derivatives business line are acetic acid, various alcohols, methanol, acetaldehyde, propylene, ethylene and synthesis gas.

        The customers of acetyl derivatives are primarily engaged in the production of paints, coatings and adhesives. The sale of formaldehyde is based on both long and short term agreements. Polyols are sold globally to a wide variety of customers, primarily in the coatings and resins and the specialty products industries. Oxo products are sold into a wide variety of end uses, including plasticizers, acrylates and solvents/ethers. The oxo market is characterized by oversupply and numerous competitors.

        Polyvinyl alcohol ("PVOH") is a performance chemical engineered to satisfy particular customer requirements. Global demand for polyvinyl alcohol is estimated to be 840,000 metric tons, according to Tecnon and our estimates. According to Stanford Research International's December 2003 report on PVOH, we are the largest North American producer of polyvinyl alcohol and the third largest producer in the world.

        PVOH is used in adhesives, building products, paper coatings, films and textiles. The primary raw material to produce polyvinyl alcohol is vinyl acetate monomer, and acetic acid is produced as a by-product. Prices vary depending on industry segment and end use application. Products are sold on a global basis, and competition is from all regions of the world. Therefore, regional economies and supply and demand balances affect the level of competition in other regions. Polyvinyl alcohol is sold to a diverse group of regional and multinational customers. The customers of our polyvinyl alcohol business line are primarily engaged in the production of adhesives, paper, films, building products, and textiles.

        Emulsions are a key component of water-based quality surface coatings, adhesives, non-woven textiles and other applications. According to Kline & Co., a chemicals industry consultant, based on sales, we held a number two position in emulsions (excluding styrene butadiene resins) in Europe and a number one position in European VAM-based emulsions in 2001. Emulsions are made from vinyl acetate monomer, acrylate esters and styrene. Emulsions and emulsion powders are sold to a diverse group of regional and multinational customers. Customers for emulsions are manufacturers of water-based quality surface coatings, adhesives, and non-woven textiles. Customers for emulsion powders are primarily manufacturers of building products.

        Our specialties business line produces (i) carboxylic acids used in detergents, synthetic lubricants and plasticizers, (ii) amines used in agrochemicals, herbicides, and in the treatment of rubber and water and (iii) oxo derivatives and special solvents which are used as raw materials for the fragrance and food ingredients industry.

        The prices for these products are generally relatively stable due to long-term contracts with customers in industries that are not generally subject to the cyclical trends of commodity chemicals. The primary raw materials for these products are olefins and ammonia, which are purchased from world market suppliers based on international prices. The specialties business line primarily serves global markets in the synthetic lubricant, agrochemical, rubber processing and other specialty chemical areas. Much of the specialties business line involves "one customer, one product" relationships, where



the business develops customized products with the customer, but the specialties business line also sells several chemicals which are priced more like commodity chemicals.

        Our principal competitors in the Chemical Products segment include Acetex Corporation, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Atofina S.A., BASF, Borden Chemical, Inc., BP p.l.c., Chang Chun Petrochemical Co., Ltd., Daicel, Dow, Eastman Chemical Corporation ("Eastman"), E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company ("DuPont"), Methanex Corporation ("Methanex"), Millennium Chemicals Inc. ("Millennium"), Nippon Goshei, Perstorp Inc., Rohm & Haas Company, Showa Denko K.K., and Kuraray Co. Ltd.

Acetate Products

        Global demand for cellulose acetate fiber was estimated to be approximately 700,000 tons, with approximately 85% comprising cigarette filter tow and the remaining 15% textile filament, according to our 2003 estimates. While filter tow demand is expected to grow 1% per annum, acetate filament is expected to decline by 4 to 6% per annum. According to the 2002 Stanford Research InstituteInternational Chemical Economics Handbook, we are the world's leading producer of acetate fibers, including production through its joint ventures in Asia. In October 2004, we announced our plans to discontinue filament production by mid-2005 and to consolidate our flake and tow production at three sites instead of the current five.

        We produce acetate flake by processing wood pulp with acetic anhydride. We purchase wood pulp that is made from reforested trees from major suppliers and produces acetic anhydride internally. The acetate flake is then further processed into acetate fiber in the form of a tow band or filament.

        The acetate products business line produces acetate tow, which is used primarily in filter products. The acetate tow market continues to be characterized by stability and slow growth. The acetate filament business line is a supplier to the textile industry. Demand for acetate filament is dependent on fashion trends and the world economy.

        Sales in the acetate filter products industry are principally to the major tobacco companies that account for a majority of worldwide cigarette production.

        In the acetate filament industry, our sales are made to textile companies that range in size from the largest in the industry to others which are quite small. The textile companies either weave or knit the acetate filament yarns to produce greige fabrics. The greige fabrics are then dyed and finished, either by the greige fabrics manufacturer or by converters who buy the fabrics and contract with dyeing and finishing companies to process the fabrics. The finished fabrics are sold to manufacturers who cut and sew the fabrics into apparel for retail stores.

        The textile industry, in particular the apparel portion of the industry, continues to undergo structural changes as production moves from high-wage to low-wage countries. In recent years, this has resulted in a changing customer base for all participants in the textile chain.

        Principal competitors in the Acetate Products segment include Acetate Products Ltd. (Acordis), Daicel, Eastman, Mitsubishi Rayon Company, Limited, Novaceta S.p.a., and Rhodia S.A. ("Rhodia").

Technical Polymers Ticona

        Ticona develops, produces and supplies a broad portfolio of high performance technical polymers including polyacetals and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene. Polyacetals are estimated to have a



3-4% annual estimated growth in the U.S. and Western Europe, according to SRI Consulting. Ticona's technical polymers have chemical and physical properties enabling them, among other things, to withstand high temperatures, resist chemical reactions with solvents and resist fracturing or stretching. These products are used in a wide range of performance-demanding applications in the automotive and electronics sectors and in other consumer and industrial goods, often replacing metal or glass.

        Ticona's customer base consists primarily of a large number of plastic molders and component suppliers, which are often the primary suppliers to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. Ticona works with these molders and component suppliers as well as directly with the OEMs to develop and improve specialized applications and systems.

        Prices for most of these products, particularly specialized product grades for targeted applications, generally reflect the value added in complex polymer chemistry, precision formulation and compounding, and the extensive application development services provided. The specialized product lines are not particularly susceptible to cyclical swings in pricing. Polyacetals pricing, mainly in standard grades, is, however, somewhat more price competitive, with many minimum-service providers competing for volume sales.

        Polyacetals are used for mechanical parts, in automotive applications including door lock systems, seat belt mechanisms, fuel senders and in electrical, consumer, medical and industrial applications such as razors, shower handsets, medical dosage systems and gears for appliances.

        The primary raw material for polyacetals is formaldehyde, which is manufactured from methanol. Ticona currently purchases formaldehyde in the United States from our Chemical Products segment and, in Europe, manufactures formaldehyde from purchased methanol.

        Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, or PE-UHMW, is a type of high density polyethylene (HDPE) specialty material that is very tough and abrasion and impact resistant. It is therefore used in different end-markets from traditional HDPE. It can be found in sheet form, molded into stock shapes, or spun into high-strength fibers. Its most common end uses are compression-molded sheets, porous parts, ram-extruded sheets, profiles, filters and rods. GUR, a form of PE-UHMW, is an engineered material used in heavy-duty automotive and industrial applications such as car battery separator panels and industrial applications, such as flood gates and conveyor belts, as well as in specialty medical and consumer applications, such as porous tips for marker pens, sports equipment, orthopedic devices or in water filtration. The basic raw material for PE-UHMW is ethylene.

        Polyesters are used in a wide variety of automotive, electrical and consumer applications, including ignition system parts, radiator grilles, airbags, electrical switches, appliance housings, boat fittings and perfume bottle caps. Raw materials for polyesters vary.

        Liquid crystal polymers, or LCPs are used in electrical and electronics applications and for precision parts with thin walls and complex shapes. Fortron, a polyphenylene sulphide, or PPS, product, is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications, especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance, including fuel system parts, radiator pipes and halogen lamp housings, and often replaces metal in these demanding applications. Celstran and Compel are long fiber reinforced thermoplastics, which impart extra strength and stiffness, making them more suitable for larger parts than conventional thermoplastics.

        A number of Ticona's polyacetals customers, particularly in the appliance, electrical components, toys and certain sections of the electronics/telecommunications fields, have moved tooling and molding operations to Asia, particularly southern China. To meet the expected increased demand in this region, Ticona, along with Polyplastics, Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company Inc., and Korea Engineering Plastics agreed on a production joint venture to construct and operate a 60,000 metric ton polyacetals facility in China.



        Ticona's principal customers are suppliers to the automotive industries as well as industrial suppliers. These customers primarily produce engineered products, and Ticona works closely with its customers to assist them to develop and improve specialized applications and systems.

        Ticona's principal competitors include BASF, DuPont, General Electric Company DSM NV, and Solvay S.A. Other competitors include Asahi Kasei Corporation, Mitsubishi Plastics, Inc., Bayer AG, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, L.P., Braskem S.A., Teijin and Toray Industries Inc.

Performance Products

        According to SRI Consulting, sales of high-intensity sweeteners represented approximately 11% of the $9.5 billion food additive businesses in the U.S., Western Europe and Japan in 2003. Nutrinova's food ingredients business consists of the production and sale of high intensity sweeteners and food protection ingredients, such as sorbic acids and sorbates, as well as the resale of dietary fiber products worldwide and the resale of other food ingredients in Japan, Australia, Mexico and the United States. Acesulfame-K, marketed under the trademark Sunett, is used in a variety of beverages, confections and dairy products throughout the world. It is a long lasting product independent of temperature and has synergies with other sweeteners, both nutritive and non-nutritive. The primary raw materials for this product are diketene and sulfur trioxide. Sunett pricing for targeted applications reflects the value added in the precision formulations and extensive technical services provided.

        Nutrinova's food protection ingredients are used in foods, beverages and personal care products. The primary raw materials for these products are ketene and crotonaldehyde. Sorbates pricing is extremely sensitive to demand and industry capacity and is not necessarily dependent on the prices of raw materials.

        The principal competitors for Nutrinova's Sunett sweetener are Holland Sweetener Company, The Nutrasweet Company, Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Tate & Lyle and several Chinese manufacturers. In sorbates, Nutrinova competes with Nantong AA, Daicel, Chisso Corporation, Cheminova, Yu Yao/Ningbo, Yancheng AmeriPac and other Japanese and Chinese manufacturers of sorbates.



BUSINESS

Celanese Corporation

        We are an integrated global producer of value-added industrial chemicals and have #1 or #2 market positions worldwide in products comprising the majority of our sales. We are also the world's largest producer of acetyl products, including acetic acid, vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) and polyacetals (POM) and a leading global producer of high-performance engineered polymers used in consumer and industrial products and designed to meet highly technical customer requirements. Our operations are located in North America, Europe and Asia, including substantial joint ventures in China. We believe we are one of the lowest-cost producers of key building block chemicals in the acetyls chain, such as acetic acid and VAM, due to our economies of scale, operating efficiencies and proprietary production technologies.

        We have a large and diverse global customer base consisting principally of major companies in a broad array of industries. In 2003, 39% of our net sales was to customers located in North America, 40% to customers in Europe and 21% to customers in Asia, Australia and the rest of the world.

Segment Overview

        We operate through four business segments: Chemical Products, Technical Polymers Ticona, Acetate Products and Performance Products. The table below illustrates each segment's net sales to external customers for the year ended December 31, 2003, as well as each segment's major products and end use markets.

 
 Chemical Products
 Technical
Polymers Ticona

 Acetate Products(2)
 Performance Products

2003 Net Sales(1)

 

$2,968 million

 

$762 million

 

$655 million

 

$169 million

Major Products

 










 

Acetic acid
Vinyl acetate monomer
(VAM)
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH)
Emulsions
Acetic anhydride
Acetate esters
Carboxylic acids
Methanol

 










 

 

Polyacetal (POM)
UHMW-PE (GUR)
Liquid crystal polymers
(Vectra)
Polyphenylene sulfide
Fortron)



 

 










 

 

Acetate tow
Acetate filament






 

 










 

 

Sunett sweetener

Sorbates







 

Major End-Use
Markets


 

 






 

Paints
Coatings
Adhesives
Lubricants
Detergents

 






 

Fuel system
components
Conveyor belts
Electronics
Seat belt mechanisms

 





 

 

Filter products
Textiles


 

 





 

 

Beverages
Confections
Baked goods
Dairy products
 

(1)
2003 net sales of $4,603 million also include $49 million in net sales from Other Activities. 2003 net sales of Chemical Products excludes $97 million in inter-segment sales.

(2)
In October 2004, we announced our plans to discontinue filament production by mid-2005 and to consolidate our flake and tow production at three sites, instead of the current five.

        Our Chemical Products segment produces and supplies acetyl products, including acetic acid, acetate esters, vinyl acetate monomer polyvinyl alcohol and emulsions. We are a leading global producer of acetic acid, the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer and the largest North American producer of methanol, the major raw material used for the production of acetic acid. We are also the largest polyvinyl alcohol producer in North America. These products are generally used as building blocks for value-added products or in intermediate chemicals used in the paints, coatings, inks,


adhesives, films, textiles and building products industries. Other chemicals produced in this segment are organic solvents and intermediates for pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical products. In 2003, sales to external customers of acetyls were $1,297 million, acetyl derivatives and polyols were $871 million and all other business lines combined totaled $800 million.

        Our Technical Polymers Ticona segment develops, produces and supplies a broad portfolio of high performance technical polymers for use in automotive and electronics products and in other consumer and industrial applications, often replacing metal or glass. Together with our 45%-owned joint venture Polyplastics, our 50%-owned joint venture Korea Engineering Plastics Company Ltd., and Fortron Industries, our 50-50 joint venture with Kureha Chemicals Industry of Japan, we are a leading participant in the global technical polymers business. The primary products within the Ticona segment are Hostaform/Celcon, our polyacetal, or POM, offerings, and GUR, an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Hostaform and Celcon are used in a broad range of products including automotive components, electronics and appliances. GUR is used in battery separators, conveyor belts, filtration equipment, coatings and medical devices. Sales to external customers in the Technical Polymers Ticona segment totaled $762 million in 2003.

        Our Acetate Products segment primarily produces and supplies acetate tow, which is used in the production of filter products and acetate filament, which is used in the apparel and home furnishing industries. Our acetate products are sold into a diverse set of end market applications, including filter products, fashion apparel, linings and home furnishings. We are one of the world's leading producers of acetate tow and acetate filament, including production by our joint ventures in China. Our Acetate Products segment primarily produces and supplies acetate tow, which is used in the production of filter products, and acetate filament, which is used in the apparel and home furnishing industries. We are one of the world's leading producers of acetate tow and acetate filament, including production by our joint ventures in China. In October 2004, we announced plans to consolidate our acetate flake and tow manufacturing by early 2007 and to exit the acetate filament business by mid-2005. This restructuring is being implemented to increase efficiency, reduce over-capacities in certain manufacturing areas and to focus on products and markets that provide long-term value. Sales to external customers of filter and filament products were $537 million and $118 million, respectively, in 2003.

        The Performance Products segment operates under the trade name of Nutrinova and produces and sells a high intensity sweetener and food protection ingredients, such as sorbates, for the food, beverage and pharmaceuticals industries. Sales to external customers of Performance Products were $169 million in 2003.

Competitive Strengths

        We have benefited from a number of competitive strengths, including the following:

        We have #1 or #2 market positions globally in products that make up a majority of our sales according to SRI Handbook and Tecnon Orbichem Survey. We are a leading global producer of acetic acid and the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer. Ticona and our joint ventures, Polyplastics and KEP, are leading suppliers of polyacetals and other engineering resins in North America, Europe and the Asia/Pacific region. Our leadership positions are based on our large share of global production capacity, operating efficiencies, proprietary technology and competitive cost structures in our major products.


        Our production of acetyl products employs industry leading proprietary and licensed technologies, including our proprietary AO Plus acid-optimization technology for the production of acetic acid and VAntage vinyl acetate monomer technology. AO Plus enables plant capacity to be increased with minimal investment, while VAntage enables significant increases in production efficiencies, lower operating costs and increases in capacity at ten to fifteen percent of the cost of building a new plant.

        Our competitive cost structures are based on economies of scale, vertical integration, technical know-how and the use of advanced technologies.

        We operate 24 production facilities (excluding our joint ventures) throughout the world, with major operations in North America, Europe and Asia. Joint ventures owned by us and our partners operate nine additional facilities. Our infrastructure of manufacturing plants, terminals, and sales offices provides us with a competitive advantage in anticipating and meeting the needs of our global and local customers in well-established and growing markets, while our geographic diversity reduces the potential impact of volatility in any individual country or region. We have a strong and growing presence in Asia (particularly in China) where joint ventures owned by us and our partners operate nine additional facilities.

        Our strategic investments, including our joint ventures, have enabled us to gain access, minimize costs and accelerate growth in new markets, while also generating significant cash flow and earnings. Our joint ventures represent an important component of our growth strategy. During the three fiscal years ended 2003, we received $291 million in dividends and other distributions from our joint ventures.

        We offer our customers a broad range of products in a wide variety of end-use markets. For example, the Technical Polymers Ticona business offers customers a broad range of high-quality engineering plastics to meet the needs of customers in numerous end-use markets, such as automotive, electrical/electronics, appliance and medical. The Chemical Products business has leading market positions in an integrated chain of basic and performance-based acetyl products, sold into diverse industrial applications. This product diversity and exposure help us reduce the potential impact of volatility in any individual market segment.

Business Strategies

        We are focused on increasing operating cash flows, profitability, return on investment and shareholder value, which we believe can be achieved through the following business strategies:

        We continually seek to reduce our production and raw material costs. We announced in July 2003 that we intend to purchase most of our North American internal methanol requirements from Southern Chemical Corporation beginning in 2005 under a multi-year agreement at a lower cost than our present cost for methanol. Our advanced process control (APC) projects generate savings in energy and raw materials while increasing yields in production units. Energy and raw materials savings resulting from APC projects were approximately $10 million in 2003 and $14 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Most significantly, we intend to intensify the implementation of Six Sigma, which has become a pervasive and important tool in both operations and administration for achieving greater


productivity and growth. We are also engaged in several projects and process technology improvements focused on energy reduction. For example, by implementing modifications and improvements in the distillation systems at our Calvert City, Kentucky polyvinyl alcohol plant, we were able to achieve a 17% reduction in steam usage. Using less energy-intense technology to more efficiently reduce acetic acid impurities at our Clear Lake Plant has also enabled reductions in steam and electricity usage. We intend to continue using best practices to reduce costs and increase equipment reliability in maintenance and project engineering.

        We intend to continue investing strategically in growth areas, including new production capacity, to extend our global market leadership position. Historically, our strong market position has enabled us to initiate capacity growth to take advantage of projected demand growth. For example, we are preparing to build a 600,000 metric ton per year world-scale acetic acid plant in China, the world's fastest growing market for acetic acid and its derivatives. We also increased the capacity of our GUR ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene plant in Germany by 10,000 tons per year in the second half of 2004, which increased Ticona's worldwide capacity by 17%. We expect to continue to benefit from our investments and capacity expansion that enable us to meet increases in global demand.

        Despite a difficult operating environment over the past several years, we have generated a significant amount of operating cash flow. Between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2003, we generated over $1.2 billion of net cash provided by operating activities which we have used principally to repay debt and make capital and strategic investments. We believe there are opportunities to further improve our operating cash flow through increasing productivity, receiving cash dividends from our joint ventures and pursuing additional cost reduction efforts. We believe in a focused capital expenditure plan that is dedicated to attractive investment projects. We intend to use our free cash flow to reduce indebtedness and selectively expand our businesses. The operating cash flow generated in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $2 million. The cash flow generation from operations was affected by the one- time payment of a $95 million obligation to a third party, $59 million associated with the exercising of stock appreciation rights and pension contributions totaling $157 million and higher interest expense due to increased debt levels. As of September 30, 2004, we had total debt of $3,100 million and cash and cash equivalents of $819 million. On a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2004 after giving effect to the Transactions, the Recent Restructuring and the Concurrent Financings, our total debt would have been $3,217 million and cash and cash equivalents would have been $646 million. See "Capitalization" for additional information.

        We continually develop new products and industry leading production technologies that solve our customers' problems. For example, Ticona has worked closely with fuel system suppliers to develop an acetal copolymer with the chemical and impact resistance necessary to withstand exposure to hot diesel fuels. In our emulsions business, we pioneered a technological solution that leads the industry in product offerings for ecologically friendly emulsions for solvent-free interior paints. We believe that our customers value our expertise, and we will continue to work with them to enhance the quality of their products.

        We will continue to further optimize our business portfolio through divestitures, acquisitions and strategic investments that enable us to focus on businesses in which we can achieve market, cost and technology leadership over the long term. In addition, we intend to continue to expand our product mix into higher value-added products. For example, we have begun construction of a 600,000 metric ton acetic acid plant in China, the world's fastest growing market for acetic acid. The plant is expected to come on stream in late 2006 or early 2007. We also divested non-core businesses, such as acrylates, which we sold to Dow in February 2004, and nylon 6/6, which we sold to BASF in December 2003.


Business Segments

        The Chemical Products segment consists of six business lines: Acetyls, Acetyl Derivatives and Polyols, Polyvinyl Alcohol, Emulsions, Specialties, and other chemical activities. All business lines in this segment mainly conduct business using the "Celanese" trade name, except Polyvinyl Alcohol, which uses the trademark Celvol, and Emulsions, which uses the trademarks Mowilith and Celvolit. The following table lists key products and their major end use markets.

Key Chemical Products
 Major End Use Markets
Methanol Formaldehyde and Acetic Acid
Acetic Acid Vinyl Acetate Monomer, Acetic Anhydride and Purified Terephthalic Acid or PTA, an Intermediate used in the production of Polyester resins, films and fibers
Acetic Anhydride Cellulose Acetate and Pharmaceuticals
Vinyl Acetate Monomer Paints, Adhesives, Paper Coatings, Films and Textiles
Acetate Esters Coatings, Inks
Oxo Alcohols Plasticizers, Acrylates, Esters, Solvents and Inks
Polyvinyl Alcohol Adhesives, Building Products, Paper Coatings, Films and Textiles
Emulsions Water-Based Quality Surface Coatings, Adhesives, Non-Woven Textiles
Emulsion Powders Building Products
Carboxylic Acids Lubricants, Detergents and Specialties
Amines Agricultural Products and Water Treatments

        Acetyls.    The acetyls business line produces:

        We are a leading global producer of acetic acid and the world's leading producer of vinyl acetate monomer according to the Tecnon Orbichem Survey. According to data from the CMAI Methanol Analysis, we are the largest producer of methanol in North America.



        Acetic acid, methanol, and vinyl acetate monomer, like other commodity products, are characterized by cyclicality in pricing. The principal raw materials in these products are natural gas and ethylene, which we purchase from numerous sources; carbon monoxide, which we purchase under long-term contracts; methanol, which we both manufacture and purchase under short-term contracts; and butane, which we purchase from several suppliers. All these raw materials, except carbon monoxide, are commodities and are available from a wide variety of sources.

        Our production of acetyl products employs leading proprietary and licensed technologies, including our proprietary AO Plus acid-optimization technology for the production of acetic acid and VAntage vinyl acetate monomer technology. AO Plus enables plant capacity to be increased with minimal investment, while VAntage enables significant increases in production efficiencies, lower operating costs and increases in capacity at 10 to 15 percent of the cost of building a new plant.

        Acetyl Derivatives and Polyols.    The acetyl derivatives and polyols business line produces a variety of solvents, polyols, formaldehyde and other chemicals, which in turn are used in the manufacture of paints, coatings, adhesives, and other products.

        Many acetyl derivatives products are derived from our production of acetic acid and oxo alcohols. Primary products are:

        Polyols and formaldehyde products are derivatives of methanol and are made up of the following products:

        Oxo alcohols and intermediates are produced from propylene and ethylene and include:

        Acetyl derivatives and polyols are commodity products characterized by cyclicality in pricing. The principal raw materials used in the acetyl derivatives business line are acetic acid, various alcohols, methanol, acetaldehyde, propylene, ethylene and synthesis gas. We manufacture many of these raw materials for our own use as well as for sales to third parties, including our competitors in the acetyl derivatives business. We purchase propylene and ethylene from a variety of sources. We manufacture



acetaldehyde for our European production, but we purchase all acetaldehyde requirements for our North American operations from third parties. Acetaldehyde is also available from other sources.

        Polyvinyl Alcohol.    Polyvinyl alcohol is a performance chemical engineered to satisfy particular customer requirements. It is used in adhesives, building products, paper coatings, films and textiles. The primary raw material to produce polyvinyl alcohol is vinyl acetate monomer, while acetic acid is produced as a by-product. Prices vary depending on industry segment and end use application. Products are sold on a global basis, and competition is from all regions of the world. Therefore, regional economies and supply and demand balances affect the level of competition in other regions. According to Stanford Research International's December 2003 report on PVOH, we are the largest North American producer of polyvinyl alcohol and the third largest producer in the world.

        Emulsions.    We purchased the emulsions business of Clariant AG on December 31, 2002. The products in this business are sold under the Mowilith and Celvolit brands and include conventional emulsions, high-pressure vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions, and powders. Emulsions are made from vinyl acetate monomer, acrylate esters and styrene. Emulsions are a key component of water-based quality surface coatings, adhesives, non-woven textiles and other applications. According to Kline & Co., a chemicals industry consultant, based on sales the business held a number two position in emulsions (excluding SBRs) in Europe and a number one position in European VAM-based emulsions in 2001.

        Specialties.    The specialties business line produces:

        The prices for these products are relatively stable due to long-term contracts with customers whose industries are not generally subject to the cyclical trends of commodity chemicals.

        The primary raw materials for these products are olefins and ammonia, which are purchased from world market suppliers based on international prices.

        In March 2002, we formed Estech, a venture with Hatco Corporation, a leading producer of synthetic lubricants, for the production and marketing of neopolyol esters or NPEs. This venture, in which we hold a 51 percent interest, built and operates a 7,000 metric ton per year NPE plant at our Oberhausen, Germany site. The plant came on stream in the fourth quarter of 2003. Neopolyol esters are used as base stocks for synthetic lubricants in refrigeration, automotive, aviation and industrial applications, as well as in hydraulic fluids. We supply Estech with carboxylic acids and polyols, the main raw materials for producing NPEs.

       ��We contributed our commercial, technical and operational C3-oxo business activities in Oberhausen, Germany to European Oxo GmbH, Celanese's European oxo chemicals joint venture with Degussa. The joint venture began operations in October 2003.

        The Chemical Products segment has production sites in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Slovenia and Germany. The emulsions business line also has tolling arrangements in the United Kingdom, France and Greece. We also participate in a joint venture in Saudi Arabia that produces methanol and MTBE. Over the last few years, we have continued to shift


our production capacity to lower cost production facilities while expanding in growth markets, such as China. As a result, we shut down our formaldehyde unit in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada in mid-2004. We announced plans to build a 600,000 metric ton acetic acid plant in Nanjing, China, which is expected to come on stream in late 2005 or early 2006.

        The Chemical Products segment's capital expenditures were $109 million, $101 million, and $63 million for the years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The capital expenditures incurred during the last three years related primarily to efficiency and safety improvement-related items associated with the normal operations of the business, as well as spending for a new plant for synthesis gas, an important raw material for the production of oxo alcohols and specialties, at our Oberhausen site. The new plant, which will supply European Oxo GmbH and Celanese, came on stream in the third quarter of 2003 and is expected to improve reliability and reduce production costs. Capital expenditures in 2003 also included the integration of a company-wide SAP system.

        The following table illustrates net sales by destination of the Chemical Products segment by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.


Net Sales to External Customers by Destination—Chemical Products

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
 
 $
 % of
Segment

 $
 % of
Segment

 $
 % of
Segment

 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
North America 1,181 39%1,039 44%1,140 47%
Europe/Africa 1,183 40%817 35%858 35%
Asia/Australia 522 18%418 18%368 15%
Rest of World 82 3%71 3%73 3%

        The Chemical Products segment markets its products both directly to customers and through distributors. It also utilizes a number of "e-channels", including its website at www.chemvip.com, as well as system to system linking through its industry portal, Elemica.

        In the acetyls business line, the methanol market is regional and highly dependent on the demand for products made from methanol. In addition to our own demands for methanol, our production is sold to a few regional customers who are manufacturers of chemical intermediates and to a lesser extent, by manufacturers in the wood products industry. We typically enter into short-term contracts for the sale of methanol. Acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer are global businesses which have several large customers. Generally, we supply these global customers under multi-year contracts. The customers of acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer produce polymers used in water-based paints, adhesives, paper coatings, film modifiers and textiles. We have long-standing relationships with most of these customers.

        Polyvinyl alcohol is sold to a diverse group of regional and multinational customers mainly under single year contracts. The customers of the polyvinyl alcohol business line are primarily engaged in the production of adhesives, paper, films, building products, and textiles.

        Emulsions and emulsion powders are sold to a diverse group of regional and multinational customers. Customers for emulsions are manufacturers of water-based quality surface coatings,



adhesives, and non-woven textiles. Customers for emulsion powders are primarily manufacturers of building products.

        Acetyl derivatives and polyols are sold to a diverse group of regional and multinational customers both under multi-year contracts and on the basis of long-standing relationships. The customers of acetyl derivatives are primarily engaged in the production of paints, coatings and adhesives. In addition to our own demand for acetyl derivatives to produce cellulose acetate, we sell acetyl derivatives to other participants in the cellulose acetate industry. We manufacture formaldehyde for our own use as well as for sale to a few regional customers that include manufacturers in the wood products and chemical derivatives industries. The sale of formaldehyde is based on both long and short term agreements. Polyols are sold globally to a wide variety of customers, primarily in the coatings and resins and the specialty products industries. Oxo products are sold to a wide variety of customers, primarily in the automotive, solvents, paints, coatings and adhesive industries. The oxo market is characterized by oversupply and numerous competitors.

        The specialties business line primarily serves global markets in the synthetic lubricant, agrochemical, rubber processing and other specialty chemical areas. Much of the specialties business line involves "one customer, one product" relationships, where the business develops customized products with the customer, but the specialties business line also sells several chemicals which are priced more like commodity chemicals.

        Our principal competitors in the Chemical Products segment include Acetex Corporation, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Atofina S.A., BASF, Borden Chemical, Inc., BP p.l.c. ("BP"), Chang Chun Petrochemical Co., Ltd., Daicel, Dow, Eastman Chemical Corporation ("Eastman"), E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company ("DuPont"), Methanex Corporation, Millennium Chemicals Inc., Nippon Goshei, Perstorp Inc., Rohm & Haas Company, Showa Denko K.K., and Kuraray Co. Ltd.

        Ticona develops, produces and supplies a broad portfolio of high performance technical polymers. The following table lists key Ticona products, their trademarks, and their major end use markets.


Key Ticona Products

 

Major End Use Markets


Hostaform/Celcon (Polyacetals)

 

Automotive, Electronics, Acetate Products and Medical

GUR (Ultra High Molecular Weight

 

Profiles, Battery Separators, Industrial Specialties,

Polyethylene or PE-UHMW)

 

Filtration, Coatings and Medical

Celanex/Vandar/Riteflex/Impet (Polyester Engineering Resins)

 

Electrical, Electronics, Automotive, Appliances and Acetate Products

Vectra (Liquid Crystal Polymers)

 

Electronics, Telecommunications, Medical and Acetate Products

Fortron (Polyphenylene Sulfide or PPS)

 

Electronics, Automotive and Industrial

Celstran, Compel (long fiber reinforced thermoplastics)

 

Automotive and Industrial

        Ticona's technical polymers have chemical and physical properties enabling them, among other things, to withstand high temperatures, resist chemical reactions with solvents and resist fracturing or



stretching. These products are used in a wide range of performance-demanding applications in the automotive and electronics sectors and in other consumer and industrial goods, often replacing metal or glass.

        Ticona is a business oriented to enable innovations for its customers while closely working together with them for a new development. Ticona focuses its efforts on developing new markets and applications for its product lines, often developing custom formulations to satisfy the technical and processing requirements of a customer's applications. For example, Ticona has worked closely with fuel system suppliers to develop an acetal copolymer with the chemical and impact resistance necessary to withstand exposure to hot diesel fuels in the new generation of common rail diesel engines. The product can also be used in automotive fuel sender units where it remains stable at the high operating temperatures present in direct-injection diesel engines.

        Ticona's customer base consists primarily of a large number of plastic molders and component suppliers, which are often the primary suppliers to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. Ticona works with these molders and component suppliers as well as directly with the OEMs to develop and improve specialized applications and systems.

        Prices for most of these products, particularly specialized product grades for targeted applications, generally reflect the value added in complex polymer chemistry, precision formulation and compounding, and the extensive application development services provided. The specialized product lines are not particularly susceptible to cyclical swings in pricing. Polyacetals pricing, mainly in standard grades, is, however, somewhat more price competitive, with many minimum-service providers competing for volume sales.

        Polyacetals are sold under the trademarks Celcon in North America and Hostaform in Europe and the rest of the world. Polyplastics and Korea Engineering Plastics, in which Ticona holds 45 and 50 percent ownership interests, respectively, are leading suppliers of polyacetals and other engineering resins in the Asia/Pacific region. Polyacetals are used for mechanical parts, including door locks and seat belt mechanisms, in automotive applications and in electrical, consumer and medical applications such as drug delivery systems and gears for appliances.

        The primary raw material for polyacetals is formaldehyde, which is manufactured from methanol. Ticona currently purchases formaldehyde in the United States from our Chemical Products segment and, in Europe, manufactures formaldehyde from purchased methanol.

        GUR, an ultra high molecular weight polyethylene or PE-UHMW, is an engineered material used in heavy-duty automotive and industrial applications such as car battery separator panels and industrial conveyor belts, as well as in specialty medical and consumer applications. GUR Micro powder grades are used for high performance filters, membranes, diagnostic devices, coatings and additives for thermoplastics & elastomers. PE-UHMW fibers are also used in protective ballistic applications. The basic raw material for GUR is ethylene.

        Polyesters such as Celanex polybutylene terephthalate, or PBT, and Vandar, a series of PBT-polyester blends, are used in a wide variety of automotive, electrical and consumer applications, including ignition system parts, radiator grilles, electrical switches, appliance housings, boat fittings and perfume bottle caps. Impetpolyethylene terephthalate, or PET, is a polyester which exhibits rigidity and strength useful in large injection molded part applications, as well as high temperature resistance in automotive or electrical/electronic applications. Riteflex is a co-polyester which adds flexibility to the range of high performance properties offered by Ticona's other products. Raw materials for polyesters vary. Base monomers, such as dimethyl terephthalate or DMT and PTA, are widely available with



pricing dependent on broader polyester fiber and packaging resins market conditions. Smaller volume specialty co-monomers for these products are typically supplied by a few companies.

        Liquid crystal polymers, or LCPs, such as Vectra, are used in electrical and electronics applications and for precision parts with thin walls and complex shapes, as well as in lamp sockets and consumer applications. Fortron, a polyphenylene sulphide, or PPS, product, is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications, especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance, including fuel system parts, radiator pipes and halogen lamp housings, and often replaces metal in these demanding applications. Fortron is manufactured by Fortron Industries, Ticona's 50-50 joint venture with Kureha Chemicals Industry of Japan. Celstran and Compel are long fiber reinforced thermoplastics, which impart extra strength and stiffness, making them more suitable for larger parts than conventional thermoplastics.

        In December 2004, we approved a plan to dispose of the Cyclo-olefin Copolymer ("COC") business included within the Technical Polymers Ticona segment and our interest in Pemeas GmbH, the fuel cell joint venture included in Other Activities.

        Ticona has polymerization, compounding and research and technology centers in Germany and the United States, as well as additional compounding facilities in Brazil. Ticona's Kelsterbach, Germany production site is located in close proximity to one of the sites being considered for a new runway under the Frankfurt airport's expansion plans. The construction of this particular runway could have a negative effect on the plant's current production capacity and future development. While the state government of Hesse and the owner of the airport promote the expansion of this option, it is uncertain whether this option is in accordance with applicable laws. Although the government of the state of Hesse expects the plan approval for the airport expansion in 2007 and the start of operations in 2009-2010, neither the final outcome of this matter nor its timing can be predicted at this time.

        Ticona's capital expenditures were $56 million, $61 million, and $86 million for the years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Ticona had expenditures in each of these three years relating primarily to efficiency and safety improvement-related items associated with the normal operations of the business. In addition, Ticona had expenditures in 2001 and 2002 for significant capacity expansions at its Bishop, Texas and Shelby, North Carolina sites. Ticona doubled its U.S. capacity for GUR PE-UHMW by building a new 30,000 metric tons per year facility in Bishop, Texas, replacing the existing plant in Bayport, Texas. The new plant came on stream in the third quarter of 2002. In 2004, Ticona completed its expansion of its Oberhausen GUR PE-UHMW capacity by 10,000 metric tons per year. In the fourth quarter of 2002, Ticona increased capacity by 6,000 metric tons at its polyacetals facility in Kelsterbach, Germany and commenced a further increase of 17,000 metric tons; however, its completion is dependent upon the outcome of the Frankfurt Airport expansion described above. The capital expenditures for 2003 also include construction of a new administrative building in Florence, Kentucky and integration of a company-wide SAP system.

        The following table illustrates the destination of the net sales of the Technical Polymers Ticona segment by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.



Net Sales to External Customers by Destination—Technical Polymers Ticona

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
 
 $
 % of Segment
 $
 % of Segment
 $
 % of Segment
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
North America 350 45%319 48%316 50%
Europe/Africa 373 49%300 46%284 45%
Asia/Australia 19 3%18 3%12 2%
Rest of World 20 3%19 3%20 3%

        Ticona's sales in the Asian market are made through its joint ventures, Polyplastics, Korea Engineering Plastics and Fortron Industries, which are accounted for under the equity method and therefore not included in Ticona's consolidated net sales. If Ticona's portion of the sales made by these joint ventures were included in the chart above, the percentage of sales sold in Asia/Australia would be substantially higher. A number of Ticona's polyacetals customers, particularly in the appliance, electrical components, toys and certain sections of the electronics/telecommunications fields, have moved tooling and molding operations to Asia, particularly southern China. To meet the expected increased demand in this region, Ticona, along with Polyplastics, Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company Inc., and Korea Engineering Plastics agreed on a joint venture to construct and operate a world-scale 60,000 metric ton polyacetals facility in China. When completed, Ticona will indirectly own an approximate 38 percent interest in this joint venture. Work on the new facility commenced in July 2003, and the new plant is expected to start operations in the second quarter of 2005.

        Ticona's principal customers are suppliers to the automotive industries as well as industrial suppliers. These customers primarily produce engineered products, and Ticona works closely with its customers to assist them to develop and improve specialized applications and systems. Ticona has long-standing relationships with most of its major customers, but it also uses distributors for most of its major products, as well as a number of electronic channels, such as its BuyTiconaDirect on-line ordering system, to reach a larger customer base. For most of Ticona's product lines, contracts with customers typically have a term of one to two years. A significant swing in the economic conditions of the end markets of Ticona's principal customers could significantly affect the demand for Ticona's products.

        Ticona's principal competitors include BASF, DuPont, General Electric Company, Solvay S.A., Asahi Kasei Corporation, DSM NV, Mitsubishi Plastics, Inc., Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, L.P., Braskem S.A., Teijin and Toray Industries Inc.

        The Acetate Products segment consists of two major business lines, acetate filter products and acetate filament. Both these business lines use the "Celanese" brand to market their products. The following table lists key products of the Acetate Products segment and their major end use markets.

Key Acetate Products

 Major End Use Markets

Acetate Tow

 

Filter Products

Acetate Filament

 

Fashion Apparel, Linings and Home Furnishings

        Products from the two major business lines are found in filter products, fashion apparel, linings and home furnishings. According to the 2002 Stanford Research Institute InternationalChemical Economics Handbook, we are the world's leading producer of acetate fibers, including production of our joint ventures in Asia.

        We produce acetate flake by processing wood pulp with acetic anhydride. We purchase wood pulp that is made from reforested trees from major suppliers and produces acetic anhydride internally. The acetate flake is then further processed into acetate fiber in the form of a tow band or filament.

        The acetate products business line produces acetate tow, which is used primarily in filter products. The acetate tow market continues to be characterized by stability and slow growth.

        We have a 30% interest in three manufacturing joint ventures with Chinese state-owned enterprises that produce cellulose acetate flake and tow in China. Additionally, in 2003, 21% of our sales of acetate tow were sold to the Chinese state-owned tobacco enterprises, the largest single market for acetate tow in the world. As demand for acetate tow in China exceeds local supply, we and our Chinese partners have agreed to expand capacity at their three manufacturing joint ventures. Although increases in manufacturing capacity of the joint ventures will reduce, beginning in 2005, the volume of our future direct sales of cellulose acetate tow to China, the dividends paid by the joint ventures to us are projected to increase once the expansions are complete in 2007.

        In October 2004, we announced plans to implement a strategic restructuring of our acetate business to increase the efficiency, reduce overcapacity in certain manufacturing areas and to focus on products and markets that provide long-term value. As part of this restructuring, we plan to discontinue acetate filament production by mid-2005 and to consolidate our acetate flake and tow operations at three locations, instead of the current five. The restructuring resulted in $50 million of asset impairment charges and charges to depreciation related to $12 million in asset retirement obligations of which $8 million was recorded by the Acetate Products segment and $4 million was recorded by the Chemical Products segment. In addition, the Company expects to record severance liabilities of approximately $40 million in the fourth quarter of 2004, with a corresponding increase in goodwill. Sales of acetate filament were $118 million in 2003.

        The acetate filament business line is a supplier to the textile industry. Demand for acetate filament is dependent on fashion trends and the world economy. Although the popularity of knit garments in the U.S. fashion industry has had a positive effect on demand for acetate filament, global demand for lining and shell material has declined due to fashion trends, such as the prevalence of casual office wear. In addition, market conditions in North America and Asia have significantly affected the global textile business and negatively affected consumption of all fibers, including acetate. Product substitution from acetate filament to polyester fibers and other filaments has also occurred. We continue to work more closely with downstream apparel manufacturers and major retailers to increase awareness of acetate's suitability for high-end fashion apparel due to its breathable and luxurious qualities.

        The Acetate Products segment is continuing its cost reduction and operations improvement efforts. These efforts are directed toward reducing costs while achieving higher productivity. In addition to restructuring activities undertaken in prior periods, we outsourced the operation and maintenance of our utility operations at the Narrows, Virginia and Rock Hill, South Carolina plants in 2003. We also closed our Charlotte, North Carolina administrative and research and development facility and relocated the functions there to the Rock Hill and Narrows locations. The relocation was substantially completed during the third quarter of 2004. In October 2004, we announced a strategic restructuring to discontinue acetate filament production and consolidate our flake and tow operations at three locations.



        The Acetate Products segment has production sites in the United States, Canada, Mexico and Belgium, and participates in three manufacturing joint ventures in China. In October 2004, we announced plans to close the Rock Hill, South Carolina, production site during 2005 and to shutdown production of acetate products at the Edmonton, Alberta, Canada site by 2007. Additionally, filament production at Narrows and Ocotlan is expected to be discontinued by mid-2005 and flake production is expected to be recommissioned in 2005.

        The Acetate Products segment's capital expenditures were $39 million, $30 million, and $31 million for the years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The capital expenditures incurred during these years related primarily to efficiency, environmental and safety improvement-related items associated with the normal operations of the business. Capital expenditures in 2003 also included the integration of a company-wide SAP system.

        The following table illustrates the destination of the net sales of the Acetate Products segment by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.


Net Sales to External Customers by Destination—Acetate Products

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
 
 $
 % of Segment
 $
 % of Segment
 $
 % of Segment
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
North America 189 29%188 30%226 33%
Europe/Africa 192 29%167 26%149 22%
Asia/Australia 258 40%256 41%287 42%
Rest of World 16 2%21 3%20 3%

        Sales in the acetate filter products industry are principally to the major tobacco companies that account for a majority of worldwide cigarette production. Our contracts with most of our customers, including our largest customer, with whom we have a long-standing relationship, are entered into on an annual basis. In recent years, the cigarette industry has experienced consolidation. In the acetate filter products industry, changes in the cigarette manufacturer customer base and shifts among suppliers to those customers have had significant effects on acetate tow prices in the industry as a whole.

        In the acetate filament industry, our sales are made to textile companies that range in size from the largest in the industry to others which are quite small. The textile companies either weave or knit the acetate filament yarns to produce greige fabrics. The greige fabrics are then dyed and finished, either by the greige fabrics manufacturer or by converters who buy the fabrics and contract with dyeing and finishing companies to process the fabrics. The finished fabrics are sold to manufacturers who cut and sew the fabrics into apparel for retail stores.

        The textile industry, in particular the apparel portion of the industry, continues to undergo structural changes as production moves from high-wage to low-wage countries. In recent years, this has resulted in a changing customer base for all participants in the textile chain from the yarn manufacturer to the garment manufacturer. Market conditions in North America and Asia have reduced profitability in the global textile industry. Many North American manufacturers in the textile chain have reduced capacity, vertically integrated with other manufacturers or exited from the business. Although demand in the Asian market continues to rise, intense competition has eroded pricing and reduced profitability. Product substitution to polyester and other fibers has also occurred. Our acetate filament business has been adversely affected by these trends in the industry.


        We are participating in the expanding Asian filament market through our marketing alliance with Teijin Limited. Teijin agreed to assist us with qualifying our acetate filament with customers beginning in January 2002 and we have successfully transitioned a majority of that business. Teijin discontinued acetate filament production in March 2002.

        Principal competitors in the Acetate Products segment include Acetate Products Ltd. (Acordis), Daicel, Eastman, Mitsubishi Rayon Company, Limited, Novaceta S.p.a., and Rhodia S.A. ("Rhodia").

        The Performance Products segment consists of the food ingredients business conducted by Nutrinova. This business uses its own trade names to conduct business. The following table lists key products of the Performance Products segment and their major end use markets.

Key Performance Products

 Major End Use Markets

Sunett (Acesulfame-K) Beverages, Confections, Dairy Products and Pharmaceuticals

Sorbates

 

Dairy Products, Baked Goods, Beverages, Animal Feeds, Spreads and Delicatessen Products

        Nutrinova's food ingredients business consists of the production and sale of high intensity sweeteners and food protection ingredients, such as sorbic acids and sorbates, as well as the resale of dietary fiber products worldwide and the resale of other food ingredients in Japan, Australia, Mexico and the United States.

        Acesulfame-K, a high intensity sweetener marketed under the trademark Sunett, is used in a variety of beverages, confections and dairy products throughout the world. The primary raw materials for this product are diketene and sulfur trioxide. Sunett pricing for targeted applications reflects the value added in the precision formulations and extensive technical services provided. Nutrinova's strategy is to be the most reliable and highest quality producer of this product, to develop new applications for the product and to expand into new markets. Nutrinova maintains a strict patent enforcement strategy, which has resulted in favorable outcomes in a number of patent infringement matters in Europe and the United States. Nutrinova's European and U.S. patents for making Sunett expire in 2005.

        Nutrinova's food protection ingredients are used in foods, beverages and personal care products. The primary raw materials for these products are ketene and crotonaldehyde. Sorbates pricing is extremely sensitive to demand and industry capacity and is not necessarily dependent on the prices of raw materials.

        Nutrinova has production facilities in Germany, as well as sales and distribution facilities in all major world markets.

        The Performance Products segment's capital expenditures were $2 million, $4 million, and $2 million for the years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The capital expenditures incurred during these years related to efficiency and safety improvement items associated with the normal operation of the business.


        The following table illustrates the destination of the net sales of the Performance Products segment by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.


Net Sales to External Customers by Destination—Performance Products

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
 
 $
 % of
Segment

 $
 % of
Segment

 $
 % of
Segment

 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)

 
North America 73 43%56 37%51 36%
Europe/Africa 59 35%55 36%52 37%
Asia/Australia 28 17%25 17%23 16%
Rest of World 9 5%15 10%16 11%

        Nutrinova directly markets Sunett primarily to a limited number of large multinational and regional customers in the beverage and food industry under long-term and annual contracts. Nutrinova markets food protection ingredients primarily through regional distributors to small and medium sized customers and directly through regional sales offices to large multinational customers in the food industry. Nutrinova is currently developing markets and new applications for its omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexanoeic acid, Nutrinova—DHA. Potential application areas include functional foods and beverages, dietary supplements, clinical nutrition and pharmaceutical end-uses.

        The principal competitors for Nutrinova's Sunett sweetener are Holland Sweetener Company, The Nutrasweet Company, Ajinomoto Co., Inc. and several Chinese manufacturers. In sorbates, Nutrinova competes with Nantong AA, Daicel, Chisso Corporation, Yu Yao/Ningbo, Yancheng AmeriPac and other Japanese and Chinese manufacturers of sorbates.

        Other Activities includes revenues mainly from the captive insurance companies and Celanese Advanced Materials, Inc., which consists of high performance polymer PBI and the Vectran polymer fiber product lines. Other activities also include corporate activities, several service companies and other ancillary businesses, which do not have significant sales.

        Our two wholly-owned captive insurance companies are a key component of our global risk management program, as well as a form of self insurance for our property, liability and workers compensation risks. The captive insurance companies issue insurance policies to our subsidiaries to provide consistent coverage amid fluctuating costs in the insurance market and to lower long-term insurance costs by avoiding or reducing commercial carrier overhead and regulatory fees. The captive insurance companies issue insurance policies and coordinate claims handling services with third party service providers. They retain risk at levels approved by the board of management and obtain reinsurance coverage from third parties to limit the net risk retained. One of the captive insurance companies also insures certain third party risks.

Joint Ventures and Investments

        We have a significant portfolio of strategic investments, including a number of joint ventures, in Asia, North America, the Middle East and Europe. In aggregate, these strategic investments enjoy significant sales, earnings and cash flow. We have entered into these strategic investments in order to gain access to local markets, minimize costs and accelerate growth in areas we believe have significant



future business potential. The table below sets forth the earnings, cash flow contribution and depreciation and amortization of our strategic investments:

 
 Predecessor
 Successor
 
 Celanese
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2003

 Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2004

 Six Months
Ended
September 30,
2004

 
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
  
  
  
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 
 (in millions)

Earnings from equity investments $12 $21 $35 $29 $12 $35
Dividends from equity investments  19  61  23  21  15  20
Other distributions from equity investments  4  39      1  
Dividends from cost investments  46  39  60  33  14  24
Depreciation and amortization of equity investees (unaudited)  29  27  27         
Depreciation and amortization of cost investees (unaudited)  18  17  17         
Total depreciation and amortization equity and cost investees (unaudited)  47  44  44         

        Depreciation and amortization as presented in the table above represents the amounts recorded by the investees based on local generally accepted accounting principles, computed in proportion to our ownership percentage. These amounts are not included in the depreciation and amortization reported by Celanese Corporation.

        The following are our principal joint ventures:

Name

 Location
 Ownership
 Accounting
Method

 Partner(s)
 Description
Chemical Products          
Clear Lake Methanol Partners LP U.S. 50.0%Equity Valero Methanol production
National Methanol Company (lbn Sina) Saudi Arabia 25.0%Cost SABIC, CTE Petrochemicals Methanol production
European Oxo JV Germany 50.0%Equity Degussa AG European propylene-based oxo chemicals business
Estech Germany 51.0%Equity Hatco Neopolyol esters (NPEs)

Technical Polymers Ticona

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Korea Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd. (KEPCO) Korea 50.0%Equity Mitsubishi Gas Chemical POM
Polyplastics Co., Ltd. Japan 45.0%Equity Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd. Polyacetal products
Fortron Industries U.S. 50.0%Equity Kureha Chemical Industries PPS

Acetate Products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Kunming Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd. China 30.0%Cost China National Tobacco Corp. Acetate tow production
Nantong Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd. China 31.0%Cost China National Tobacco Corp. Acetate tow production
Zhuhai Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd. China 30.0%Cost Tobacco China National Corp. Acetate tow production

        Polyplastics Co., Ltd.    Polyplastics Co., Ltd. ("Polyplastics") is a leading supplier of engineering plastics in the Asia-Pacific region. Established in 1964 and headquartered in Japan, Polyplastics is a 45/55 joint venture between us and Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd. Polyplastics' principal production


facilities are located in Japan, Taiwan, and Malaysia (with an additional joint venture facility under construction in China). We believe Polyplastics is the largest producer and marketer of POM in the Asia-Pacific region.

        Korea Engineering Plastics Co. Ltd.    Founded in 1987, Korea Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd. ("KEPCO") is the leading producer of POM in South Korea. We acquired our 50% interest in KEPCO in 1999 from the Hyosung Corporation, a Korean conglomerate. Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company owns the remaining 50% of KEPCO. KEPCO operates a 55,000-ton annual capacity polyacetal plant in Ulsan, South Korea.

        Fortron Industries.    Fortron Industries is a 50/50 joint venture between us and Kureha Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. (KCI) of Japan. Production facilities are located in Wilmington, NC. We believe Fortron has the leading technology in linear polymer.

        European Oxo.    In October 2003, we entered into a 50/50 joint venture for European oxo operations with Degussa. Under the terms of this joint venture, we merged our commercial, technical and operational propylene-based oxo business activities, with those of Degussa's Oxeno subsidiary. European Oxo has plants in Oberhausen and Marl, Germany.

        InfraServs.    We hold ownership interests in several InfraServ groups located in Germany. InfraServs own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants.

        China Acetate Products Joint Ventures.    We hold approximately 30% ownership interests (50% board representation) in three separate joint venture acetate products production entities in China: the Nantong, Kunming, and Zhuhai Cellulose Fiber Companies. In each instance, Chinese state-owned entities control the remainder. The terms of these joint ventures were recently extended through 2020. With an estimated 30% share of the world's cigarette production and consumption, China is the world's largest and fastest growing market for acetate tow products. In combination, these ventures represent the market leader in Chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to capture future growth in the Chinese cigarette market. In March 2003, we and our partners decided to expand the manufacturing facilities at all three joint ventures in China. We expect that these expansions will be completed during 2007. The joint ventures expect to fund the required investments from operating cash flows.

        National Methanol Co. (Ibn Sina).    With production facilities in Saudi Arabia, National Methanol Co. represents 2% of the world's methanol production capacity and is the world's eighth largest Methanol producer of MTBE. Methanol and MTBE are key global commodity chemical products. We own a 25% interest in National Methanol Co., with the remainder held by the Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) (50%) and Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd. (25%). SABIC has responsibility for all product marketing.

Acquisitions and Divestitures

        We have recently acquired the following businesses:


        We have recently divested the following businesses:


        For further information on the acquisitions and divestitures discussed above, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Summary of Consolidated Results—2003 Compared with 2002—Discontinued Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001" and note 7 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.

Raw Materials and Energy

        We purchase a variety of raw materials from sources in many countries for use in our production processes. We have a policy of maintaining, when available, multiple sources of supply for materials. However, some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials, such as carbon monoxide and acetaldehyde. In 2003, a primary U.S. supplier of wood pulp to the Acetate Products segment shut down its pulp facility. This closure resulted in increased operating costs for expenses associated with qualifying wood pulp from alternative suppliers and significant increases in wood pulp inventory levels. We have secured alternative sources of wood pulp supply. Although we have been able to obtain sufficient supplies of raw materials, there can be no assurance that unforeseen developments will not affect our raw material supply. Even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material, there can be no assurance that these sources can make up for the loss of a major supplier. Nor can there be any guarantee that profitability will not be affected should we be required to qualify additional sources of supply in the event of the loss of a sole supplier. In addition, the price of raw materials varies, often substantially, from year to year.

        A substantial portion of our products and raw materials are commodities whose prices fluctuate as market supply/demand fundamentals change. For example, the volatility of prices for natural gas and ethylene (whose cost is in part linked to natural gas prices) has increased in recent years. Our production facilities rely largely on coal, fuel oil, natural gas and electricity for energy. Most of the raw materials for our European operations are centrally purchased by our subsidiary, which also buys raw materials on behalf of third parties. We manage our exposure through the use of derivative instruments and forward purchase contracts for commodity price hedging, entering into long-term supply agreements, and multi-year purchasing and sales agreements. Our policy, for the majority of our natural gas and butane requirements, allows entering into supply agreements and forward purchase or cash-settled swap contracts, generally for up to 24 months. During the first nine months of 2004, we did not enter into any forward contracts for our butane requirements and, for natural gas, had positions covering about 35% of our North American Chemical Products segment requirements primarily as a result of forward contracts entered into in 2003. As these forward contracts expire, we may be exposed



to future price fluctuations if the forward purchase contracts are not replaced, or if we elect to replace them, we may have to do so at higher costs. Although we seek to offset increases in raw material prices with corresponding increases in the prices of its products, we may not be able to do so, and there may be periods when such product price increases lag behind raw material cost increases. In the future, we may modify our practice of purchasing a portion of our commodity requirements forward, and consider utilizing a variety of other raw material hedging instruments in addition to forward purchase contracts in accordance with changes in market conditions.

Research and Development

        All of our businesses conduct research and development activities to increase competitiveness. Our Technical Polymers Ticona and Performance Products segments in particular are innovation-oriented businesses that conduct research and development activities to develop new, and optimize existing, production technologies, as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications.

        The Chemical Products segment has been focusing on improving core production technologies, such as improving catalyst development, and supporting both debottlenecking and cost reduction efforts.

        The Acetate Products segment has been concentrating on developing new fabrics using acetate filament and new applications for other acetate materials, such as their use in disposable consumer materials.

        Research in the Technical Polymers Ticona segment is focused on the development of new formulations and applications for its products, improved manufacturing processes and new polymer materials with varying chemical and physical properties in order to meet customer needs and to generate growth. This effort involves the entire value chain from new or improved monomer production, polymerization and compounding, to working closely with end-users to identify new applications that can take advantage of these high performance features. Ticona is continually improving compounding recipes to extend product properties and grades, while offering grade consistency on a global basis. In addition, Ticona is developing new polymerization and manufacturing technology in order to meet economic and ecological goals without sacrificing high quality processing.

        The research and development activities of the Performance Products segment are conducted at Nutrinova's Frankfurt, Germany location. They are directed towards expanding its existing technologies and developing new applications for existing products in close cooperation with its customers.

        Research and development costs are included in expenses as incurred. Our research and development costs for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $89 million, $65 million and $74 million, respectively. For additional information on our research and development expenses, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Summary of Consolidated Results—2003 Compared with 2002—Research and Development Expenses."

Intellectual Property

        We attach great importance to patents, trademarks, copyrights and product designs in order to protect our investment in research and development, manufacturing and marketing. Our policy is to seek the widest possible protection for significant product and process developments in our major markets. Patents may cover products, processes, intermediate products and product uses. Protection for individual products extends for varying periods in accordance with the date of patent application filing and the legal life of patents in the various countries. The protection afforded, which may also vary from country to country, depends upon the type of patent and its scope of coverage.

        In most industrial countries, patent protection exists for new substances and formulations, as well as for unique applications and production processes. However, our continued growth strategy may bring us to regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to



enforce. We maintain strict information security policies and procedures wherever we do business. Such information security policies and procedures include data encryption, controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information, as well as employee awareness training. Moreover, we monitor our competitors and vigorously challenge patent and trademark infringement. For example, the Chemical Products segment maintains a strict patent enforcement strategy, which has resulted in favorable outcomes in a number of patent infringement matters in Europe, Asia and the United States. We are currently pursuing a number of matters relating to the infringement of our acetic acid patents. Some of our earlier acetic acid patents will expire in 2007; other patents covering acetic acid are presently pending.

        As patents expire, the products and processes described and claimed in those patents become generally available for use by the public. Our European and U.S. patents for making Sunett, an important product in our Performance Products segment, expire in 2005, which will reduce our ability to realize revenues from making Sunett due to increased competition and potential limitations and will result in our results of operations and cash flows relating to the product being less favorable than today. We believe that the loss of no other single patent which may expire in the next several years will materially adversely affect our business or financial results.

        We seek to register trademarks extensively as a means of protecting the brand names of our products, which brand names become more important once the corresponding patents have expired. We protect our trademarks vigorously against infringement and also seek to register design protection where appropriate.

Environmental and Other Regulation

        Obtaining, producing and distributing many of our products involves the use, storage, transportation and disposal of toxic and hazardous materials. We are subject to extensive, evolving and increasingly stringent national and local environmental laws and regulations, which address, among other things, the following.


        We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may require us to remove or mitigate the effects of the disposal or release of chemical substances at various sites. Under some of these laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of property may be held liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances on, under, or in its property, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or caused the presence of the contaminants, and regardless of whether the practices that resulted in the contamination were legal at the time they occurred. As many of our production sites have an extended history of industrial use, it is impossible to predict precisely what effect these laws and regulations will have on us in the future. Soil and groundwater contamination has occurred at some of our sites, and might occur or be discovered at other sites. Our worldwide expenditures in 2003, including those with respect to third party and divested sites, and those for compliance with environmental control regulations and internal company initiatives totaled $80 million of which $10 million was for capital projects. It is anticipated that stringent environmental regulations will continue to be imposed on us and the industry in general. Although we cannot predict with certainty future expenditures, due to new air regulations in the U.S., management expects that there will be a temporary increase in compliance costs that will total approximately $30 million to $45 million through 2007 or, according to our estimates, approximately $50 million in addition to the


$30 to $45 million over that time depending on the outcome of the pending court challenge to the low risk alternative method of compliance allowed by recent air regulations for Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters, but thereafter management believes that the current spending trends will continue. It is difficult to estimate the future costs of environmental protection and remediation because of many uncertainties, including uncertainties about the status of laws, regulations, and information related to individual locations and sites. Subject to the foregoing, but taking into consideration our experience to date regarding environmental matters of a similar nature and facts currently known, we believe that capital expenditures and remedial actions to comply with existing laws governing environmental protection will not have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.

Air Issues

        In December 1997, the Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change drafted the Kyoto Protocol, which would establish significant emission reduction targets for six gases considered to have global warming potential (referred to as greenhouse gases) and would drive mandatory reductions in developed nations subject to the Protocol. With Russia's ratification in November 2004, the Protocol has been adopted by enough of the larger, industrialized countries (defined in Annex I to the Protocol) to come into effect, which will formally occur in February 2005, in all nations that have ratified it. The European Union or EU, including Germany and other countries where Celanese has interests, ratified the Kyoto Protocol in 2002 and is formulating applicable regulations. A recent European Union directive requires Germany and Belgium, like all EU member states, to implement a trading system covering carbon dioxide emissions to be in place by January 1, 2005. The new directive, which is already implemented into German and Belgian law, will affect our power plants at the Kelsterbach and Oberhausen sites in Germany and the Lanaken site in Belgium, as well as the power plants being operated by InfraServ entities on sites at which we operate. We and the InfraServ entities may be required to purchase carbon dioxide credits, which could result in increased operating costs, or may be required to develop additional cost-effective methods to reduce carbon dioxide emissions further, which could result in increased capital expenditures. We have not yet determined the impact of this legislation on future capital spending.

        In 2002, President Bush announced new climate change initiatives for the U.S. Among the policies to be pursued is a voluntary commitment to reduce the "greenhouse gas intensity" of the U.S. economy by 18 percent within the next ten years. The Bush Administration is seeking to partner with various industrial sectors, including the chemical industry, to reach this goal. The American Chemistry Council, of which we are a member, has committed to pursue additional reductions in greenhouse gas intensity toward an overall target of 18 percent by 2012, using 1990 emissions intensity as the baseline. We currently emit carbon dioxide and smaller amounts of methane and experience some losses of polyfluorinated hydrocarbons used as refrigerants. We have invested and continue to invest in improvements to our processes that increase energy efficiency and decrease greenhouse gas intensity.

        In some cases, compliance with environmental health and safety requirements involves our incurring capital expenditures. Due to new air regulations in the United States, management expects that there will be a temporary increase in compliance costs that will total approximately $30 million to $45 million through 2007. For example, the Miscellaneous Organic National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants regulations, and various approaches to regulating boilers and incinerators, including the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters, will impose additional requirements on our operations. Although some of these rules have been finalized, a significant portion of the NESHAP for Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters regulation that provides for a low risk alternative method of compliance for hydrogen chloride emissions has been challenged in federal court. We cannot predict the outcome of this challenge, which could, if successful, increase our costs by, according to our estimates, approximately $50 million in addition to the $30 million to $45 million noted above through 2007 to comply with this regulation.


Chemical Products Issues

        Other new or revised regulations may place additional requirements on the production, handling, labeling or use of some chemical products. Pursuant to a European Union regulation on Risk Assessment of Existing Chemicals, the European Chemicals Bureau of the European Commission has been conducting risk assessments on approximately 140 major chemicals. Some of the chemicals initially being evaluated include vinyl acetate monomer or VAM, which Celanese produces, as well as competitors' products, such as styrene and 1,3-butadiene. These risk assessments entail a multi-stage process to determine whether and to what extent the Commission should classify the chemical as a carcinogen and, if so, whether this classification, and related labeling requirements, should apply only to finished products that contain specified threshold concentrations of a particular chemical. In the case of VAM, we currently do not expect a final ruling until the end of the first half of 2005. We and other VAM producers are participating in this process with detailed scientific analyses supporting the industry's position that VAM is not a probable human carcinogen and that labeling of end products should not be required but that, if it is, should only be at relatively high parts per million of residual VAM levels in the end products. It is not possible for us to predict the outcome or effect of any final ruling.

        Several recent studies have investigated possible links between formaldehyde exposure and various medical conditions, including leukemia. The International Agency for Research on Cancer or IARC recently reclassified formaldehyde from Group 2A (probable human carcinogen) to Group 1 (known human carcinogen) based on studies linking formaldehyde exposure to nasopharyngeal cancer, a rare cancer in humans. IARC also concluded that there is insufficient evidence for a causal association between leukemia and occupational exposure to formaldehyde, although it also characterized evidence for such an association as strong. The results of IARC's review will be examined by government agencies with responsibility for setting worker and environmental exposure standards and labeling requirements.

        We are a producer of formaldehyde and plastics derived from formaldehyde. We, together with other producers and users, are evaluating these findings. We cannot predict the final effect of IARC's reclassification.

        Other recent initiatives will potentially require toxicological testing and risk assessments of a wide variety of chemicals, including chemicals used or produced by us. These initiatives include the Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program and High Production Volume Chemical Initiative in the United States, as well as various European Commission programs, such as the new European Environment and Health Strategy, commonly known as SCALE, and the Proposal for the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals or REACH. REACH, which was proposed by the European Commission in October 2003, will establish a system to register and evaluate chemicals manufactured or imported to the European Union. Depending on the final ruling, additional testing, documentation and risk assessments will occur for the chemical industry. This will affect European producers of chemicals as well as all chemical companies worldwide that export to member states of the European Union. The final ruling has not yet been decided.

        The above-mentioned assessments in the United States and Europe may result in heightened concerns about the chemicals involved, and in additional requirements being placed on the production, handling, labeling or use of the subject chemicals. Such concerns and additional requirements could increase the cost incurred by our customers to use our chemical products and otherwise limit the use of these products, which could adversely affect the demand for these products.



Remediation Issues

        We are subject to claims brought by United States federal or state regulatory agencies, regulatory agencies in other jurisdictions or private individuals regarding the cleanup of sites that we own or operate, owned or operated, or where waste or other material from its operations was disposed, treated or recycled. In particular, we have a potential liability under the United States Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, commonly known as Superfund, the United States Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and related state laws, or regulatory requirements in other jurisdictions, or through obligations retained by contractual agreements for investigation and cleanup costs. At many of these sites, numerous companies, including us, or one of our predecessor companies, have been notified that the Environmental Protection Agency or EPA, state governing body or private individuals consider such companies to be potentially responsible parties under Superfund or related laws. The proceedings relating to these sites are in various stages. The cleanup process has not been completed at most sites. We regularly review the liabilities for these sites and has accrued its best estimate of its ultimate liability for investigation or cleanup costs, but, due to the many variables involved in such estimation, the ultimate liability may vary from these estimates.

        Our wholly-owned subsidiary, InfraServ Verwaltungs GmbH, is the general partner of the InfraServ companies that provide on-site general and administrative services at German sites in Frankfurt am Main-Hoechst, Gendorf, Huerth-Knapsack, Wiesbaden, Oberhausen and Kelsterbach. Producers at the sites, including our subsidiaries, are owners of limited partnership interests in the respective InfraServ companies. The InfraServ companies are liable for any residual contamination and other pollution because they own the real estate on which the individual facilities operate. In addition, Hoechst, as the responsible party under German public law, is liable to third parties for all environmental damage that occurred while it was still the owner of the plants and real estate. However, the InfraServ companies have agreed to indemnify Hoechst from any environmental liability arising out of or in connection with environmental pollution of any InfraServ site. The partnership agreements provide that, as between the limited partners, each limited partner is responsible for any contamination caused predominantly by such partner. The limited partners have also undertaken to indemnify Hoechst against such liabilities. Any liability that cannot be attributed to an InfraServ partner and for which no third party is responsible, is required to be borne by the InfraServ company in question. In view of this potential obligation to eliminate residual contamination, the InfraServ companies in which we have an interest, have recorded provisions totaling approximately $72 million as of December 31, 2003. If the InfraServ companies default on their respective indemnification obligations to eliminate residual contamination, the limited partners in the InfraServ companies have agreed to fund such liabilities, subject to a number of limitations. To the extent that any liabilities are not satisfied by either the InfraServ companies or the limited partners, these liabilities are to be borne by us in accordance with the demerger agreement.

        As between Hoechst and Celanese, Hoechst has agreed to indemnify Celanese for two-thirds of these demerged residual liabilities. Likewise, in some circumstances Celanese could be responsible for the elimination of residual contamination on a few sites that were not transferred to Infraserv companies, in which case Hoechst must reimburse Celanese for two-thirds of any costs so incurred.

        Some of our facilities in Germany are over 100 years old, and there may be significant contamination at these facilities. Provisions are not recorded for potential soil contamination liability at facilities still under operation, as German law does not currently require owners or operators to investigate and remedy soil contamination until the facility is closed and dismantled, unless the authorities otherwise direct. However, soil contamination known to the owner or operator must be remedied if such contamination is likely to have an adverse effect on the public. If we were to terminate operations at one of our facilities or if German law were changed to require such removal or



clean up, the cost could be material to us. We cannot accurately determine the ultimate potential liability for investigation and clean up at such sites. We adjust provisions as new remedial commitments are made. See notes 23 and 24 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In the demerger agreement, Celanese agreed to indemnify Hoechst against environmental liabilities for environmental contamination that could arise under some divestiture agreements regarding chemical businesses, participations or assets that were entered into by Hoechst prior to the demerger. Celanese and Hoechst have agreed that Celanese will indemnify Hoechst against those liabilities up to an amount of €250 million (approximately $310 million). Hoechst will bear those liabilities exceeding €250 million (approximately $310 million), but Celanese will reimburse Hoechst for one-third of those liabilities for amounts that exceed €750 million (approximately $930 million). Celanese has made payments through September 30, 2004 of $37 million for environmental contamination liabilities in connection with the divestiture agreements. As of September 30, 2004, Celanese has reserves of $47 million for this contingency and may be required to record additional reserves in the future. See notes 23 and 24 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.

        At September 30, 2004, the estimated range for remediation costs is between $100 million and $150 million, with the best estimate of $147 million. Future findings or changes in estimates could have a material affect on the recorded reserves and Celanese's cash flows. As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we have reserves of $147 million and $159 million, respectively, for environmental matters worldwide.

Organizational Structure

        We operate our global businesses through subsidiaries in Europe, North America and Asia, all of which are owned indirectly through a series of holding companies. Our European and Asian subsidiaries, including Celanese Chemicals Europe GmbH, Ticona GmbH, Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH, and Celanese Singapore Pte., Ltd. are owned indirectly by Celanese AG. In North America, many of the businesses are consolidated under Celanese Americas Corporation which, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, CNA Holdings, Inc., directly or indirectly owns the North American operating companies. These include Celanese Ltd., Ticona Polymers, Inc., Celanese Acetate LLC, and Grupo Celanese S.A.

Description of Property

        As of December 31, 2003, we had numerous production and manufacturing facilities throughout the world. We also own or lease other properties, including office buildings, warehouses, pipelines, research and development facilities and sales offices.


        The following table sets forth a list of our principal production and other facilities throughout the world.

Site

 Leased/Owned
 Products/Function
Corporate Offices    
Dallas, Texas, USA Leased Corporate headquarters
Kronberg/Taunus, Germany Leased Administrative offices
Bedminster, New Jersey, USA Leased Administrative offices

Chemical Products

 

 

 

 
Bay City, Texas, USA Owned Butyl acetate
Iso-butylacetate
Propylacetate
Vinyl acetate monomer
Carboxylic acids
n/i-Butyraldehyde
Butyl alcohols
Propionaldehyde,
Propyl alcohol
Bishop, Texas, USA Owned Formaldehyde
Methanol
Pentaerythritol
Polyols
Calvert City, Kentucky, USA Owned Polyvinyl alcohol
Cangrejera, Veracruz, Mexico Owned Acetic anhydride
Acetone derivatives
Ethyl acetate
Vinyl acetate monomer
Methyl amines
Clear Lake, Texas, USA Owned Acetic acid
Vinyl acetate monomer
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Owned Methanol
Frankfurt am Main, Germany Owned by InfraServ GmbH &
Co. Hoechst KG, in which
Celanese holds a 31.2 percent
limited partnership interest
 Acetaldehyde
Butyl acetate
Conventional emulsions
Emulsion powders
Vinyl acetate
    ethylene
    emulsions
Vinyl acetate monomer
Frankfurt am Main, Germany Leased Conventional emulsions
Emulsion powders
Vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions
Oberhausen, Germany Owned by InfraServ GmbH &
Co. Oberhausen KG, in which
Celanese holds an 84.0 percent
limited partnership interest
 Amines
Carboxylic Acids
Neopentyl Glycols
Pampa, Texas, USA Owned Acetic acid
Acetic anhydride
Ethyl acetate
Pasadena, Texas, USA Owned Polyvinyl alcohol
     


Jurong Island, Singapore Owned Acetic acid
Butyl acetate
Ethyl acetate
Vinyl acetate monomer
Koper, Slovenia Owned Conventional emulsions
Tarragona, Spain Owned by Complejo Industrial
Taqsa AIE, in which Celanese
holds a 15.0 percent share
 Vinyl acetate monomer
Tarragona, Spain Owned Vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions
Tarragona, Spain Leased Conventional emulsions
Perstorp, Sweden Owned Conventional emulsions
Vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions
Acetate Products    
Lanaken, Belgium Owned Tow
Narrows, Virginia, USA(1) Owned Tow, Filament, Flake
Ocotlan, Jalisco, Mexico(1) Owned Tow, Filament

Technical Polymers Ticona

 

 

 

 
Auburn Hills, Michigan, USA Leased
Center
 Automotive Development
Bishop, Texas, USA Owned Celanex
GUR
Polyacetal Compounding
Florence, Kentucky, USA Owned Compounding, Administrative Offices
Kelsterbach, Germany Owned by InfraServ GmbH &
Co. Kelsterbach KG, in which
Celanese holds a 100.0% limited
partnership interest
 Celstran Polyacetals
Compounding
Oberhausen, Germany Owned by InfraServ GmbH &
Co. Oberhausen KG, in which
Celanese holds an 84.0% limited
partnership interest
 GUR
Norbornene
Topas(2)
Shelby, North Carolina, USA Owned
PBT Compounding
 LCP(3)
Wilmington, North Carolina, USA Leased by a non-consolidated
joint venture, in which Celanese
has a 50% interest
 Fortron PPS
Winona, Minnesota, USA Owned Celstran

Performance Products

 

 

 

 
Frankfurt am Main, Germany Owned by InfraServ GmbH &
Co. Hoechst KG, in which
Celanese holds a 31.2% limited
partnership interest
 Sorbates
Sunett

(1)
Filament production at Narrows and Ocotlan is expected to be discontinued by mid-2005. Flake production at Ocotlan is expected to be recommissioned in 2005.

(2)
Technical Polymers Ticona's leased plant for its Topas cycloolefin copolymer in Oberhausen, Germany commenced production in September 2000. As Topas continues to undergo market development, the plant is operating at significantly less than commercial capacity. For further information on Topas, see "Business—Business Segments—Technical Polymers Ticona."

(3)
Technical Polymers Ticona completed a significant expansion of its Vectra LCP plant in Shelby, North Carolina in the second quarter of 2002. Continued depressed levels in the telecommunications industry, a principal market for Vectra, coupled with the increased capacity, has resulted in this plant operating at significantly less than commercial capacity.

        Polyplastics has its principal production facilities in Japan, Taiwan and Malaysia. Korea Engineering Plastics has its principal production facilities in South Korea. Our Chemical Products segment has joint ventures with manufacturing facilities in Saudi Arabia and Germany and its Acetate Products segment has three joint ventures with production facilities in China.

        In 2003, Celanese and its consolidated subsidiaries, in the aggregate, had capital expenditures for the expansion and modernization of production, manufacturing, research and administrative facilities of $211 million. In 2002 and 2001, these expenditures amounted to $203 million and $191 million, respectively. We believe that our current facilities and those of our consolidated subsidiaries are adequate to meet the requirements of our present and foreseeable future operations. We continue to review our capacity requirements as part of our strategy to maximize our global manufacturing efficiency.

        For information on environmental issues associated with our properties, see "Business—Environmental and Other Regulation" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Environmental Matters." Additional information with respect to our property, plant and equipment, and leases is contained in notes 12 and 24 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements.

Employees

        As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately 9,500 employees worldwide from continuing operations, compared to 10,500 as of December 31, 2002. This represents a decrease of approximately 10 percent. We had approximately 5,600 employees in North America, 3,600 employees in Europe, 200 employees in Asia and 100 employees in the rest of the world. The following table sets forth the approximate number of employees on a continuing basis as of December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001.

 
 Employees as of December 31,
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
North America 5,600 6,300 6,900
 thereof USA 4,000 4,600 5,000
 thereof Canada 400 500 600
 thereof Mexico 1,200 1,200 1,300
Europe 3,600 3,900 3,400
 thereof Germany 3,000 2,800 2,900
Asia 200 200 200
Rest of World 100 100 100
  
 
 
Total Celanese Employees 9,500 10,500 10,600
  
 
 

        Many of our employees are unionized, particularly in Germany, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Belgium and France However, in the United States, less than one quarter of our employees are unionized. Moreover, in Germany and France, wages and general working conditions are often the subject of centrally negotiated collective bargaining agreements. Within the limits established by these agreements,



our various subsidiaries negotiate directly with the unions and other labor organizations, such as workers' councils, representing the employees. Collective bargaining agreements between the German chemical employers associations and unions relating to remuneration typically have a term of one year, while in the United States a three year term for collective bargaining agreements is typical. We offer comprehensive benefit plans for employees and their families and believe our relations with employees are satisfactory.

Legal Proceedings

        We are involved in a number of legal proceedings, lawsuits and claims incidental to the normal conduct of our business, relating to such matters as product liability, anti-trust, past waste disposal practices and release of chemicals into the environment. While it is impossible at this time to determine with certainty the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, lawsuits and claims, management believes that adequate provisions have been made and that the ultimate outcomes will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, but may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or cash flows in any given accounting period. See also note 23 to the Celanese Consolidated Financial Statements and note 13 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Our subsidiary, CNA Holdings, along with Shell, DuPont and others, have been the defendants in a series of lawsuits alleging that plastics manufactured by these companies that were utilized in the production of plumbing systems for residential property were defective or caused such plumbing systems to fail. Based on, among other things, the findings of outside experts and the successful use of Ticona's acetal copolymer in similar applications, CNA Holdings does not believe Ticona's acetal copolymer was defective or caused the plumbing systems to fail. In many cases CNA Holdings' exposure may be limited by invocation of the statute of limitations since Ticona ceased selling the acetal copolymer for use in the plumbing systems in site built homes during 1986 and in manufactured homes during 1990.

        CNA Holdings has been named a defendant in ten putative class actions, further described below, as well as a defendant in other non-class actions filed in ten states, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Canada. In these actions, the plaintiffs typically have sought recovery for alleged property damages and, in some cases, additional damages under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act or similar type statutes. Damage amounts have not been specified.


        In order to reduce litigation expenses and to provide relief to qualifying homeowners, in November 1995, CNA Holdings, DuPont and Shell entered into a national class action settlement, which has been approved by the courts. The settlement calls for the replacement of plumbing systems of claimants who have had qualifying leaks, as well as reimbursements for specified leak damage. Furthermore, the three companies have agreed to fund these replacements and reimbursements up to $950 million (which now amounts to $1,073 million, due to additional contributions and funding commitments of primarily other parties). There are additional pending lawsuits in approximately 10 jurisdictions not covered by this settlement; however, these cases do not involve (either individually or in the aggregate) a large number of homes and management does not expect the obligations arising from these lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on CNA Holdings.

        In 1995, CNA Holdings and Shell settled the claims relating to individuals in Texas owning a total of 110,000 property units, who are represented by a Texas law firm for an amount that will not exceed $170 million. These claimants are also eligible for a replumb of their homes in accordance with terms similar to those of the national class action settlement.


        In addition, a lawsuit filed in November 1989 in Delaware Chancery Court, between CNA Holdings and various of its insurance companies relating to all claims incurred and to be incurred for the product liability exposure led to a partial declaratory judgment in CNA Holdings' favor. As a result, settlements have been reached with a majority of CNA Holdings' insurers specifying their responsibility for these claims. However, in January 2000, CNA Holdings filed a motion in Superior State Court in Wilmington, Delaware to set a trial date with respect to this lawsuit against one insurer, asserting that the settlement is void because the insurer refused to make the required "coverage in place" payments to CNA Holdings. The insurer and CNA Holdings signed a settlement agreement in June 2003. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the insurer agreed to pay CNA Holdings $105 million in five annual installments in satisfaction of all claims incurred and to be incurred for the product liability expense previously covered by the insurer.

        Management believes that the plumbing actions are provided for in the consolidated financial statements and that they will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position. However, if we were to incur an additional charge for this matter, such a charge may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in any given accounting period. No assurance can be given that our litigation reserves will be adequate or that we will fully recover claims under our insurance policies.

        In 1998, Nutrinova, then a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hoechst, received a grand jury subpoena from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in connection with a criminal antitrust suit relating to the sorbates industry. In May 1999, Hoechst and the U.S. Federal Government entered into an agreement under which Hoechst pled guilty to a one-count indictment charging Hoechst with participating in a conspiracy to fix prices and allocate market shares of sorbates sold in the United States. Hoechst and the U.S. Federal Government agreed to recommend that the U.S. District Court fine Hoechst $36 million, payable over five years, with the last payment of $5 million being paid in June 2004. Hoechst also agreed to cooperate with the U.S. Federal Government's investigation and prosecutions related to the sorbates industry. The U.S. District Court accepted this plea in June 1999 and imposed a penalty as recommended in the plea agreement.

        Nutrinova and Hoechst have cooperated with the European Commission since 1998 in connection with matters relating to the sorbates industry. In May 2002, the European Commission informed Hoechst of its intent to officially investigate the sorbates industry, and in early January 2003, the European Commission served Hoechst, Nutrinova and a number of competitors with a statement of objections alleging unlawful, anticompetitive behavior affecting the European sorbates market. In October 2003, the European Commission ruled that Hoechst, Chisso Corporation, Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd., The Nippon Synthetic Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. and Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry Ltd. operated a cartel in the European sorbates market between 1979 and 1996. The European Commission imposed a total fine of €138.4 million (approximately $172 million), of which €99 million (approximately $123 million) was assessed against Hoechst. The case against Nutrinova was closed. The fine against Hoechst is based on the European Commission's finding that Hoechst does not qualify under the leniency policy, is a repeat violator and, together with Daicel, was a co-conspirator. In Hoechst's favor, the European Commission gave a discount for cooperating in the investigation. Hoechst appealed the European Commission's decision in December 2003.

        In addition, several civil antitrust actions by sorbates customers, seeking monetary damages and other relief for alleged conduct involving the sorbates industry, have been filed in U.S. state and federal courts naming Hoechst, Nutrinova, and our other subsidiaries, as well as other sorbates manufacturers, as defendants. Many of these actions have been settled and dismissed by the court. One private action,Kerr v. Eastman Chemical Co. et al., is still pending in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division,



Gloucester County. The plaintiff alleges violations of the New Jersey Antitrust Act and the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and seeks unspecified damages.

        In July 2001, Hoechst and Nutrinova entered into an agreement with the Attorneys General of 33 states, pursuant to which the statutes of limitations were tolled pending the states' investigations. This agreement expired in July 2003. Since October 2002, the Attorneys General for New York, Illinois, Ohio, Utah and Idaho filed suit on behalf of indirect purchasers in their respective states. The Utah, Nevada and Idaho actions have been dismissed as to Hoechst, Nutrinova and Celanese. A motion for reconsideration is pending in Nevada and an appeal is pending in Idaho. The Ohio and Illinois actions have been settled. The New York action,New York v. Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd., et al. pending in the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, is the only Attorney General action still pending; it too seeks unspecified damages. All antitrust claims in this matter were dismissed by the court in September 2004; however other state law claims are still pending. A settlement agreement with the Attorneys General of Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Maryland, South Carolina, Oregon and Washington is currently being negotiated and these Attorneys General have granted extensions of the tolling agreement.

        Although the outcome of the foregoing proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that any resulting liabilities, net of amounts recoverable from Hoechst, will not, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial position, but may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or cash flows in any given period. In the demerger agreement, Hoechst agreed to pay 80 percent of liabilities that may arise from the government investigation and the civil antitrust actions related to the sorbates industry.

        Celanese International Corporation v. China Petrochemical Development Corporation—Taiwan Kaohsiung District Court. On February 7, 2001, Celanese filed a private criminal action for patent infringement against certain employees of China Petrochemical Development Corporation, or CPDC, in the Taiwan Kaohsiung District Court. Celanese is alleging that CPDC's employees infringed its ROC Patent No. 27572 covering the manufacture of acetic acid. On February 16, 2001, Celanese filed a Supplementary Civil Brief in the same court alleging damages against CPDC in the amount of about $450 million based on a period of infringement of 10 years, 1991-2000, and based on CPDC's own data and as reported to the Taiwanese securities and exchange commission. Celanese's ROC patent was held valid by the Taiwanese Patent Office on March 8, 2001, after 14 months of legal proceedings before the patent office based on two cancellation actions by CPDC. In view of the recent changes in the Taiwanese patent laws, the supplementary civil action has been converted into an independent civil action, and the amount of damages claimed by Celanese has been reassessed at $35 million. This action is still pending.

        Celanese AG is a defendant in the following nine consolidated actions brought by minority shareholders during August 2004 in the Frankfurt District Court (Landgericht):


        Further, two minority shareholders have joined the proceedings via a third party intervention in support of the plaintiffs. The Purchaser has joined the proceedings via a third party intervention in support of Celanese AG. On September 8, 2004, the Frankfurt District Court consolidated the nine actions.

        Among other things, these actions request the court to set aside shareholder resolutions passed at the extraordinary general meeting held on July 30 and 31, 2004 based on allegations that include the alleged violation of procedural requirements and information rights of the shareholders.

        Further, on August 2, 2004, two minority shareholders instituted public register proceedings with the Königstein Local Court (Amtsgericht) and the Frankfurt District Court, both with a view to have the registration of the Domination Agreement in the Commercial Register deleted (Amtslöschungsverfahren). These actions are based on an alleged violation of procedural requirements at the extraordinary general meeting, an alleged undercapitalization of the Purchaser and Blackstone and an alleged misuse of discretion by the competent court with respect to the registration of the Domination Agreement in the Commercial Register.

        Based upon information available as of the date of this prospectus, the outcome of the foregoing proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. The time period to bring forward challenges has expired.

        The amounts of the fair cash compensation (Abfindung) and of the guaranteed fixed annual payment (Ausgleich) offered under the Domination Agreement may be increased in special award proceedings (Spruchverfahren) initiated by minority shareholders, which may further reduce the funds the Purchaser can otherwise make available to us. As of the date of this prospectus, several minority shareholders of Celanese AG have initiated special award proceedings seeking court's review of the amounts of the fair cash compensation (Abfindung) and of the guaranteed fixed annual payment (Ausgleich) offered under the Domination Agreement. As of the date of this prospectus, so far, pleadings by several minority shareholders have been served on the Purchaser. As a result of these proceedings, the amounts of the fair cash compensation (Abfindung) and of the guaranteed fixed annual payment (Ausgleich) could be increased by the court so that all minority shareholders including those who have already tendered their shares into the mandatory offer and have received the fair cash compensation could claim the respective higher amounts. This may reduce the funds the Purchaser can make available to the Issuer and its subsidiaries and, accordingly, diminish our ability to make payments on our indebtedness.

        Celanese Ltd. and/or CNA Holdings, Inc., both our U.S. subsidiaries, are defendants in approximately 800 asbestos cases, the majority of which are premises-related. Because many of these cases involve numerous plaintiffs, we are subject to claims significantly in excess of the number of actual cases. We have reserves for defense costs related to claims arising from these matters. We believe we do not have any significant exposure in these matters.



MANAGEMENT

        Set forth below are the names, ages, as of December 14, 2004, and current positions of the Issuer's present executive officers and directors and the individuals expected to be appointed as executive officers or elected as directors prior to the consummation of the offering:

Name

 Age
 Position
David N. Weidman 49 Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Corliss J. Nelson

 

60

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Lyndon B. Cole

 

51

 

Executive Vice President and President of Ticona

Andreas Pohlmann

 

46

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary

Chinh E. Chu

 

38

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors

John M. Ballbach

 

44

 

Director(1)

James Barlett

 

60

 

Director

Benjamin J. Jenkins

 

33

 

Director

William H. Joyce

 

68

 

Director

Anjan Mukherjee

 

31

 

Director

Paul H. O'Neill

 

68

 

Director

Hanns Ostmeier

 

44

 

Director

James A. Quella

 

54

 

Director

Daniel S. Sanders

 

65

 

Director

(1)
Expected to be elected prior to the consummation of this offering. Mr. Ballbach has consented to be named as a director to be elected in the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

        David N. Weidman has been our Chief Executive Officer and President and a member of the Board of Directors since December 2004. Until October 31, 2004 Mr. Weidman was a member of the board of management of Celanese AG and served as its Vice Chairman since September 23, 2003 and Celanese AG's chief operating officer since January 1, 2002. He joined Celanese AG as the chief executive officer of Celanese Chemicals on September 1, 2000. Before joining Celanese AG, he was a member of Honeywell/Allied Signal's corporate executive council and the president of its performance polymers business since 1998. Mr. Weidman joined Allied Signal in 1994 as vice president and general manager of performance additives and became president and general manager of fluorine products in 1995. Mr. Weidman began his career in the chemical industry with American Cyanamid in 1980, serving as vice president and general manager of its fibers division from 1990 to 1994, as vice president and general manager of Cyanamid Canada from 1989 to 1990, and as managing director of Cyanamid Nordiska in Stockholm, Sweden from 1987 to 1989. He is also a board member of the American



Chemistry Council and the National Advisory Council of the Marriott School of Management, and is the Honorary Treasurer of the Society of Chemical Industry.

        Corliss J. Nelson has been our Chief Financial Officer since December 2004 and our Executive Vice President since November 2004. Mr. Nelson joined our company from JM Family Enterprises, where he had been executive vice president and chief financial officer since 2003. Before that Mr. Nelson was senior executive vice president and chief financial officer of Ryder System and also served on Ryder's board of directors from 1999 to 2003. He joined Koch Industries, Inc. in 1978 and held positions in controlling and treasury and as president of their international group and capital services group. Following graduation from California State Polytechnic University with a degree in finance and accounting, he began his career in a succession of finance positions at Cessna Aircraft Company and Rockwell International.

        Dr. Lyndon Cole has been our Executive Vice President since December 2004. Since April 1, 2003 he has also been Ticona's president. Currently, he is Vice Chairman of Celanese AG's board of management, of which Dr. Cole has been a member since September 23, 2003. He has been the head of Celanese AG Growth and Excellence Council since April 1, 2003. Dr. Cole joined Celanese AG in March of 2002 as president of Celanese Chemicals. From 1998 to 2001, he had been chief executive officer of United Kingdom based Elementis PLC, a global specialty chemicals company. Prior to joining Elementis, he was general manager Global Structured Products for GE Plastics from 1990 to 1998 and previously held general management and commercial positions with GE Plastics, Dow Chemicals Europe and ICI.

        Dr. Andreas Pohlmann has been our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary since December 2004. Since November 1, 2004, he has been Chairman of the board of management of Celanese AG. Before that he had been appointed Chief Administrative Officer and a member of the board of management of Celanese AG since October 22, 2002 and has served as Celanese AG's Vice President and Corporate Secretary since October 1999, and as managing director of Celanese Ventures since February 2002. In his ten years at Hoechst, Dr. Pohlmann, an attorney, held various positions of increasing responsibility in the Corporate Law, Corporate Public and Governmental Affairs, and Corporate Controlling and Development departments, ultimately serving as Hoechst AG's Corporate Secretary from 1996 to 1999. He is also a member of the supervisory board of the Pensionskasse der Mitarbeiter der Hoechst-Gruppe VVaG (German pension fund for employees of the Hoechst Group).

        Chinh E. Chu has been our Chairman of the Board of Directors since December 2004. Mr. Chu has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 2004. He is a Senior Managing Director of The Blackstone Group, which he joined in 1990. Mr. Chu currently serves on the boards of directors of Nalco Holdings LLC and Nycomed Holdings. Mr. Chu also serves on the supervisory board of Celanese AG.

        John M. Ballbach is expected to be elected a member of our Board of Directors prior to the consummation of this offering. Until December 2003, he was president and chief operating officer of The Valspar Corporation, a company he joined in 1990. Before becoming The Valspar Corporation's president and chief operating officer in 2002, he served as its senior vice president, EPS, color corporation and operations, from 2000 to 2002 and its group vice president, packaging since 1998. He is a vice chair of the Urban Ventures Leadership Foundation.

        James Barlett has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2004. He is vice chairman of TeleTech Holdings, Inc. since October 2001. Mr. Barlett was elected to TeleTech Holdings Inc.'s board of directors in February 2000. He previously served as the chairman, president, and chief executive officer of Galileo International. Prior to joining Galileo, Barlett served as executive vice



president for MasterCard International Corporation and was executive vice president for NBD Bancorp. Mr. Barlett serves as a director of TeleTech Holdings, Inc. and Korn/Ferry International.

        Benjamin J. Jenkins has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 2004. He is a Principal of The Blackstone Group, which he joined in 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Jenkins was an associate at Saunders Karp & Megrue. Mr. Jenkins currently serves on the board of directors of Axtel S.A. de C.V., Vanguard Health Systems and on the supervisory board of Celanese AG.

        Dr. William H. Joyce has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2004. He is chairman and chief executive officer of Nalco Holdings Company since November 2003. Prior to that, Dr. Joyce was chairman and chief executive officer of Hercules Incorporated between May 2001 and November 2003 and had been chairman, president and chief executive officer of Union Carbide Corporation since 1996 through May 2001. Dr. Joyce has been a director of El Paso Corp. since May 2004 and is also a director of CVS Corporation. He serves as a trustee of the Universities Research Association, Inc. and Co-Chairman of the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable of the National Academies.

        Anjan Mukherjee has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 2004. He is a Principal of The Blackstone Group, which he joined in 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Mukherjee was with Thomas H. Lee Company where he was involved with the analysis and execution of private equity investments in a wide range of industries. Before that, Mr. Mukherjee worked in the Mergers & Acquisitions Department at Morgan Stanley.

        Paul H. O'Neill has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2004. Mr. O'Neill has been a Special Advisor at The Blackstone Group L.P. since March 2003. Prior to that, he served as U.S. Secretary of the Treasury during 2001 and 2002 and was chief executive officer of Alcoa Inc. from 1987 to 1999 and chairman of the board from 1987 to 2000. He currently also serves on the boards of directors of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp., Nalco Holdings Company and Eastman Kodak Company.

        Dr. Hanns Ostmeier has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2004. He is a Senior Managing Director of The Blackstone Group and head of Blackstone's office in Hamburg, Germany. Before joining Blackstone in September 2003, Mr.Dr. Ostmeier worked for seven years with the European private equity group, BC Partners GmbH, leaving there in December 2002 as a managing director of their German advisory office in Hamburg. Mr.Dr. Ostmeier is a member of the supervisory board of Celanese AG.

        James A. Quella has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2004. He is a Senior Managing Director and Senior Operating Partner at The Blackstone Group. Prior to joining Blackstone in 2004, Mr. Quella was a managing director and senior operating partner with DLJ Merchant Banking Partners-CSFB Private Equity. Prior to that, Mr. Quella worked at Mercer Management Consulting and Strategic Planning Associates, its predecessor firm, where he served as a senior consultant to CEOs and senior management teams, and was co-vice chairman with shared responsibility for overall management of the firm.

        Daniel S. Sanders has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2004. He was president of ExxonMobil Chemical Company and vice president of ExxonMobil Corporation since December 1999 until his retirement in August 2004. Prior to the merger of the two companies, Mr. Sanders served as president of Exxon Chemical since January 1999 and as its executive vice president since 1998. Mr. Sanders also serves as a director of Arch Chemicals Inc. Mr. Sanders is a member of the Council of Overseers of the Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management at Rice University, the Advisory Board of the University of South Carolina and Furman University and the Board of Governors of the Houston Grand Opera.



        Each officer serves at the discretion of our board of directors and holds office until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Composition of the Board of Directors After this Offering

        Immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, the Issuer's board of directors is expected to consist of eleven directors, including three independent directors. The Issuer expects to add another independent director within 12 months of the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

        Our board of directors will be divided into three classes. The members of each class serve for a three-year term. It is expected that Messrs. Ostmeier, Quella, and Sanders will serve in the class with a term expiring in 2005, Messrs. Barlett, Ballbach, Mukherjee and O'Neill will serve in the class with a term expiring in 2006, and Messrs. Chu, Jenkins, Joyce and Weidman will serve in the class with a term expiring in 2007. At each annual meeting of the stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the directors of the same class whose terms are then expiring.

        Whenever (1) dividends on any shares of the preferred stock or any other class or series of stock ranking on a parity with the preferred stock with respect to the payment of dividends shall be in arrears for dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, containing in the aggregate a number of days equivalent to six calendar quarters or (2) we fail to pay the redemption price on the date shares of preferred stock are called for redemption (whether the redemption is pursuant to the optional redemption provisions or the redemption is in connection with a designated event) then, immediately prior to the next annual meeting of shareholders, the total number of directors constituting the entire board will automatically be increased by two and, in each case, the holders of shares of preferred stock (voting separately as a class with all other series of other preferred stock on parity with the preferred stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will be entitled to vote for the election of such directors at the next annual meeting of stockholders and each subsequent meeting until the redemption price or all dividends accumulated on the preferred stock have been fully paid or set aside for payment. Directors elected by the holders of the preferred stock shall not be divided into the classes of the board of directors and the term of office of all directors elected by the holders of preferred stock will terminate immediately upon the termination of the right of the holders of preferred stock to vote for directors and upon such termination the total number of directors constituting the entire board will automatically be reduced by two.

        The Issuer intends to avail itself of the "controlled company" exception under the New York Stock Exchange rules which eliminates the requirements that a company has a majority of independent directors on its board of directors and that its compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be composed entirely of independent directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

        Our board of directors will have an executive committee, audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee.

        Immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, the Issuer's executive committee will consist of Messrs. Chu, Weidman and Jenkins. The executive committee will be responsible for exercising all of the powers of the board of directors during intervals between meetings, except for those powers delegated to other committees of the board of directors and powers which may not be delegated to a committee of the board of directors under Delaware law.


        Immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, the Issuer's audit committee will consist of Messrs. Barlett, Jenkins and Ballbach. Mr. Barlett will be our audit committee "financial expert" as such term is defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K.

        The audit committee will be responsible for (1) the hiring or termination of independent auditors and approving any non-audit work performed by such auditor, (2) approving the overall scope of the audit, (3) assisting the board of directors in monitoring the integrity of our financial statements, the independent auditors' qualifications and independence, the performance of the independent auditors and our internal audit function and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (4) annually reviewing an independent auditors' report describing the auditing firms' internal quality-control procedures, any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the auditing firm, (5) discussing the annual audited financial and quarterly statements with management and the independent auditor, (6) discussing earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies, (7) discussing policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, (8) meeting separately, periodically, with management, internal auditors and the independent auditor, (9) reviewing with the independent auditor any audit problems or difficulties and managements' response, (10) setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditors, (11) annually reviewing the adequacy of the audit committee's written charter, (12) handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the audit committee by the board of directors from time to time, (13) reporting regularly to the full board of directors and (14) evaluating the board of directors' performance.

        The board of directors shall adopt the Celanese Global Business Conduct Policy, which applies to all directors, officers and employees, and a Financial Code of Ethics, which sets forth additional ethics requirements for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. Both the Global Business Conduct Policy and the Financial Code of Ethics will be posted on our website.

        Immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, the Issuer's compensation committee will consist of Messrs. Chu, Jenkins and Mukherjee. The compensation committee will be responsible for (1) reviewing key employee compensation policies, plans and programs, (2) reviewing and approving the compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers, (3) developing and recommending to the board of directors compensation for board members, (4) reviewing and approving employment contracts and other similar arrangements between us and our executive officers, (5) reviewing and consulting with the chief executive officer on the selection of officers and evaluation of executive performance and other related matters, (6) administration of stock plans and other incentive compensation plans, (7) overseeing compliance with any applicable compensation reporting requirements of the SEC, (8) approving the appointment and removal of trustees and investment managers for pension fund assets, (9) retaining consultants to advise the committee on executive compensation practices and policies and (10) handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the compensation committee by the board of directors from time to time.

        Immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, the Issuer's nominating and corporate governance committee will consist of Messrs. Mukherjee, Quella and Weidman. The nominating and corporate governance committee will be responsible for (1) developing and recommending criteria for selecting new directors, (2) screening and recommending to the board of directors individuals qualified to become executive officers, (3) overseeing evaluations of the board of directors, its members and


committees of the board of directors and (4) handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the nominating and corporate governance committee by the board of directors from time to time.

Director Compensation

        The Issuer doesWe do not currently pay any compensation to itsour management directors for serving as a director or as a member or chair of a committee of the board of directors. The Issuer plansWe plan to pay itsour non-management directors an annual cash retainer of $125,000 and a fee of $1,250 for each board meeting and each committee meeting attended. The Issuer also plansattended and to pay a fee for acting as committee chair. In addition, we expect to sell shares of our Series A common stock and to grant options to acquire shares of our Series A common stock to our directors under our stock incentive plan described below.

Executive Compensation

        We continually review our executive compensation programs to ensure that they are competitive. We intend to establish executive compensation plans that link compensation with the performance of our company.

        The following table shows all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid in 2004 to our Chief Executive Officer and four other most highly compensated executive officers based on salary, whom we refer to as the "named executive officers."

 
  
 Annual Compensation
 Long-Term
Compensation

  
 
Name and Principal Position(1)

 Year
 Salary
 Bonus
 LTIP
Payouts(2)

 All Other
Compensation

 
David N. Weidman, Chief Executive Officer and President 2004 $1,102,581(3)$942,024 $2,493,295 $17,500(4)
Lyndon B. Cole, Executive Vice President 2004 $650,000 $559,563 $413,725 $767,622(5)
Andreas Pohlmann, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary 2004 $598,000 $689,081 $852,347 $48,413(6)
Corliss J. Nelson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer 2004 $575,000(7)      
John O'Dwyer, Vice President, Strategic Procurement and Service Management 2004 $264,211 $193,851 $1,061,984 $17,500(4)

(1)
We have provided compensation information as to 2004 for the named executive officers because 2004 is the first year in which we, as a newly established company following the Tender Offer and the Original Financing, are paying compensation to our named executive officers. Messrs. Weidman, Cole, Pohlmann and Nelson were appointed to their positions at Celanese Corporation on December 14, 2004. The amounts set forth above include, for Messrs. Weidman, Cole and Pohlmann, compensation received from other Celanese entities prior to December 14, 2004.

(2)
Includes stock appreciation rights paid out under Celanese AG's Equity Participation and Long Term Incentive Plans.

(3)
Mr. Weidman's salary includes $248,915 in 2004 deferred compensation pursuant to the Celanese Americas Corporation Management Incentive Deferral Plan which permits deferrals of compensation from any incentive plan.

(4)
Includes a $15,000 Executive Perquisite and a $2,500 special award for Mr. O'Dwyer and a $16,000 automobile allowance and a $1,500 tax preparation fee reimbursement for Mr. Weidman.

(5)
Includes a special retention incentive of €200,000 ($259,070) granted in 2003 for retention through the end of 2003 but paid in 2004, as well as a payment to compensate Messrs. Cole and Pohlmann for foregone gains on stock appreciation rights and shares such executive officers would have acquired had they not been restricted

(6)
Includes $48,413 in sundry compensation granted to Dr. Pohlmann in 2004 under the Letter of Understanding between Celanese and Dr. Pohlmann dated October 27, 2004 regarding Dr. Pohlmann's relocation to the United States.

(7)
Mr. Nelson's annualized salary is $575,000. His employment commenced on November 8, 2004. He received salary payments of $77,404 in 2004. This was the only compensation received by Mr. Nelson in 2004.

        The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 by our named executive officers. At the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, there were no unexercised options or stock appreciation rights.

Name and Principal Position

 Shares Acquired
on Exercise

 Value Realized ($)
David N. Weidman, Chief Executive Officer and President 246,800 $1,572,698
Lyndon B. Cole, Executive Vice President 55,000 $414,570
Andreas Pohlmann, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary 71,450 $359,632
Corliss J. Nelson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer   
John O'Dwyer, Vice President, Strategic Procurement and Service Management 57,750 $340,362

Stock Incentive Plan

        In December 2004, we adopted a stock incentive plan which is designed to assist us in recruiting and retaining key employees, directors or consultants of outstanding ability and to motivate such employees, directors or consultants to exert their best efforts on our behalf by providing compensation and incentives through the granting of awards. The plan will permit us to grant to our executive officers, key employees, directors and consultants stock options, stock appreciation rights, or other stock-based awards. In connection with the plan, we intend to grant stock options and enter into stock option agreements with our executive officers, key employees and directors and grant rights to purchase stock at a discount to our executive officers, key employees and directors.

        Administration.    Our compensation committee will administer the Stock Incentive Plan. The committee will determine who will receive awards under the Stock Incentive Plan, as well as the form of the awards, the number of shares underlying the awards, and the terms and conditions of the awards consistent with the terms of the plan. The committee will be authorized to interpret the Stock Incentive Plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the Stock Incentive Plan, and to make any other determinations that it deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the plan. The committee will be able to correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Stock Incentive Plan in the manner and to the extent the committee deems necessary or desirable.

        Shares Reserved for Awards, Limits on Awards and Shares Outstanding.    The total number of shares of our Series A common stock available for issuance or delivery under the Stock Incentive Plan will be 16,250,000.

        In the event of any stock dividend or split, reorganization, recapitalization, merger, share exchange or any other similar transaction, the committee will adjust (i) the number or kind of shares or other securities that may be issued or reserved for issuance pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan or pursuant



to any outstanding awards, (ii) the option price or exercise price and/or (iii) any other affected terms of such awards.

        Stock Options.    The Stock Incentive Plan will permit the committee to grant participants incentive stock options, which qualify for special tax treatment in the United States, as well as nonqualified stock options. The committee will establish the duration of each option at the time it is granted, with a maximum ten-year duration for incentive stock options. The committee will be able to establish vesting and performance requirements that must be met prior to the exercise of options.

        Stock option grants may include provisions that permit the option holder to exercise all or part of the holder's vested options, or to satisfy withholding tax liabilities, by tendering shares of Series A common stock already owned by the option holder for at least six months (or another period consistent with the applicable accounting rules) with a fair market value equal to the exercise price. Stock option grants may also include provisions that permit the option holder to exercise all or part of the holder's vested options through an exercise procedure, which requires the delivery of irrevocable instructions to a broker to sell the shares obtained upon exercise of the option and deliver promptly to us the proceeds of the sale equal to the aggregate exercise price of the Series A common stock being purchased.

        Stock Appreciation Rights.    The committee will also have the ability to grant stock appreciation rights, either alone or in tandem with underlying stock options, as well as limited stock appreciation rights, which will be exercisable upon the occurrence of certain contingent events. Stock appreciation rights will entitle the holder upon exercise to receive an amount in any combination of cash or shares of our Series A common stock (as determined by the committee) equal in value to the excess of the fair market value of the shares covered by the right over the grant price.

        Other Stock-Based Awards.    The Stock Incentive Plan permits the committee to grant awards that are valued by reference to, or otherwise based on, the fair market value of our Series A common stock. These awards will be in such form and subject to such conditions as the committee may determine, including the satisfaction of performance goals, the completion of periods of service or the occurrence of certain events.

        Expected Awards.    Prior to this offering, we expect to issue 1,437,909 shares of our Series A common stock under our stock incentive plan to certain of our executive officers, key employees and directors at an aggregate price of approximately $13 million or $9.00 per share. Such issuance is not subject to the consummation of this offering. As a result of the discounted share offering, we will take a one-time pre-tax non-cash charge of $16 million. The funds to purchase the shares to be issued prior to the offering of our Series A common stock will be paid to these executive officers and other key employees for this purpose under our deferred compensation plan described below.

        In addition, we expect to issue shares under our stock incentive plan to certain of our executive officers, key employees and directors at the price to public per share in the offering of our Series A common stock and to grant options to purchase 12,311,718 shares of Series A common stock with an exercise price equal to the price to public per share in the offering of our Series A common stock.stock to our executive officers, key employees and directors. The estimated number of shares that we expect to issue has been calculated based on the mid-point of the estimated price range for the shares of Series A common stock and, accordingly, may change in conjunction with any change in our anticipated offering price for the shares of Series A common stock.

        In connection with these stock issuances, we expect to enter into a stockholders agreement with the recipient of the shares. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—New Arrangements—Employee Stockholders Agreement."

        Change-in-Control Provisions.    The committee may, in the event of a change in control, provide that any outstanding awards that are unexercisable or otherwise unvested will become fully vested and



immediately exercisable. In addition, the committee may, in its sole discretion, provide for the termination of an award upon the consummation of the change in control and the payment of a cash amount in exchange for the cancellation of an award, and/or the issuance of substitute awards that will substantially preserve the otherwise applicable terms of any affected award.



        Amendment and Termination.    Our board of directors will have the ability to amend or terminate the Stock Incentive Plan at any time, provided that no amendment or termination will be made that diminishes the rights of the holder of any award. Our board of directors will have the ability to amend the plan in such manner as it deems necessary to permit awards to meet the requirements of applicable laws.

Deferred Compensation Plan

        Prior to the consummation of the offering,In December 2004, we intend to adoptadopted a deferred compensation plan for the named executive officers as well as certain other key employees.

        The compensation committee will administer the deferred compensation plan. Following the adoption of the deferred compensation plan, theThe compensation committee will establish a separate book entry account for each participant in the plan equal to an amount established by the compensation committee. The aggregate maximum amount payable under the deferred compensation plan will be $243 million.million (based on an assumed initial public offering price of $20.00). The initial component of the deferred compensation plan totaling an aggregate of approximately $29 million vested in 2004 and will be paid in the first quarter of 2005. The remaining aggregate maximum amount payable of $214 million is subject to downward adjustment if the price of our common stock falls below the initial public offering price and vests subject to the criteria set out below. Generally, the amount of each account will be adjusted to reflect the price per share received in connection with the offering of our Series A common stock and will be adjusted downward to reflect downward changes, if any, in the price per share of our Series A common stock following the offering of our Series A common stock. Each participant's account represents an unsecured obligation of the Issuer.

        In connection with the initial component of the deferred compensation plan totalling an aggregate of $29 million, we expect that the participants will use the cash receipts from the plan for the purchase of shares of our Series A Common Stock at an assumed price of $9.00 per share, for the purchase of shares directly from us under our directed share program at the price to the public per share in the offering of our Series A common stock and to pay taxes associated with such distribution from the plan. The estimated number of shares that we expect to issue at a price of $9.00 per share has been calculated based on the mid-point of the estimated price range for the shares of Series A common stock and accordingly, may change in conjunction with any change in our anticipated offering price for the shares of Series A common stock.

        A portion of each account will vest (i) based on (i) the participant's continued employment with us (the "time vesting criteria") and (ii) the occurrence of a sale or other disposition by Blackstone of at least ninety percent (90%) of its equity interest in the Issuer in which Blackstone receives at least a twenty-five percent (25%) cash internal rate of return on its equity interest (a "Qualifying Sale"). The remaining portion of each account will vest (i) based on (i) the achievement of performance criteria established by the compensation committee (the "performance vesting criteria") and (ii) the occurrence of a Qualifying Sale. TheExcept as set forth below, the applicable portion of the account will become payable when both vesting criteria are satisfied. In the event a participant is terminated by us without cause (as defined in the deferred compensation plan), the participant resigns with good reason (as defined in the deferred compensation plan) or the participants becomes disabled (as defined in the deferred compensation plan) or dies (each termination a "Good Termination") the vesting of a portion of the account will accelerate with respect to the time vesting criteria and the performance vesting criteria.



        Upon a termination of employment for any reason, the account shall be forfeited to the extent that the account is not vested in both vesting criteria; provided, that in the event a participant (other than a named executive officer) is terminated due to a Good Termination the portion of the participant's account vested in the time vesting criteria and performance vesting criteria will be paid, without regard to whether Blackstone has engaged in a Qualifying Sale; provided, further, that if a named executive officer is terminated due to a Good Termination, the portion of the participant's account that has



satisfied the time vesting criteria and the performance vesting criteria will be paid, if and when a Qualifying Sale occurs.

        The deferred compensation plan will be subject to the recently-enacted American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which generally imposes new requirements with respect to compensation deferred under deferred compensation plans after December 31, 2004. Under new Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, created in connection with the Act, the U.S. Treasury Department is directed to issue regulations providing guidance and provide a limited period during which deferred compensation plans may be amended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A. When the regulations are issued, we may be required to make modifications to the deferred compensation plan to comply with Section 409A.

Bonus

        Prior to the consummation of this offering, we will pay bonuses of $2 million, in the aggregate, to certain members of management. In addition, Messrs. Weidman, Pohlmann and Cole will be eligible to receive retention bonuses totaling approximately $12.8 million in the aggregate. Fifty percent of the retention bonuses will be immediately vested and paid prior to the consummation of this offering. The remaining fifty percent of the retention bonuses will vest twenty-five percent per year on December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, subject to the achievement of cost reduction targets to be determined by us. The after-tax amount received by certain members of management in connection with these bonuses can be used to purchase shares directly from us under the directed share program at the price to the public per share in the Series A common stock offering.

Employment Agreements

        Prior to the consummation of this offering, the Issuer intends to enter into employment agreements with Messrs. Weidman, Pohlmann, Cole and Nelson. The term of each agreement will be three years. The executives will be entitled to an annual base salary ($900,000 for Mr. Weidman, $650,000 for Mr. Pohlmann, $700,000 for Mr. Cole and $575,000$675,000 for Mr. Nelson) and will be eligible to earn an annual bonus targeted at 80% of base salary. In the event that an executive is terminated by the Issuer without cause (as defined in the agreement) or the executive resigns for good reason (as defined in the agreement) the executive will be entitled to, subject to continued compliance with the restrictive covenants described below, (i) continued payment of base salary and target bonus for one year and (ii) a pro rata bonus for the year of termination, based on actual Company performance. The executives will be subject to customary confidentiality, intellectual property and non-disclosure covenants. In addition, the executives will be subject to noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions during the term of employment and for a period of one year thereafter.



PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND BENEFICIAL OWNERS

        The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of common stock of the Issuer, as of the time of the expected closing of the common stock offering, by (i) each person known to own beneficially more than 5% of common stock of the Issuer, (ii) each of the Issuer's directors, (iii) each of the Issuer's named executive officers and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.

        The number of shares and percentage of beneficial ownership before the offering set forth below are based on shares of common stock of the Issuer issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the 153.325569 for one common stock split we expect to effect prior to the consummation of the Series A common stock offering. The number of shares outstanding after the Series A common stock offering and the percentages of beneficial ownership after the Series A common stock offering are based on 158,675,271 shares of common stock of the Issuer to be issued and outstanding immediately after the Series A common stock offering, including 7,500,000 shares of Series A common stock that will be either distributed to the Original Stockholders as a stock dividend assuming no exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option or sold to the underwriters pursuant to their over-allotment option assuming full exercise of that option, in each case in respect of the Series A common stock.

 
 Series A
Common Stock

 Series B
Common Stock

 Total Series A and Series B Common Stock
 
 
  
  
 Percentage of Shares
Beneficially Owned
After this Offering

  
  
  
 Percentage of Shares
Beneficially Owned
After this Offering

 
 
 Shares
Beneficially
Owned Prior
to this
Offering

 Shares
Beneficially
Owned Prior
to and After
this Offering

  
 
 
 Percentage
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Prior
to this
Offering

 
 
 Assuming the
Underwriters'
Option
Is Not
Exercised(*)

 Assuming the
Underwriters'
Option
Is Exercised
in Full(*)

 Assuming the
Underwriters'
Option
Is Not
Exercised(*)

 Assuming the
Underwriters'
Option
Is Exercised
in Full(*)

 
Name of Beneficial Owner

 
 Number
 Percent
 Number
 Percent
 
Affiliates of The Blackstone Group(1)   11.8%* 92,356,797 92.6%91.3%62.6%58.2%
BA Capital Investors Sidecar Fund, L.P.(2)   **  7,380,565 7.4%7.3%5.0%4.7%
Stephen A. Schwarzman(1)   11.8% 92,356,797 92.6%91.3%62.6%58.2%
Peter G. Peterson(1)   11.8% 92,356,797 92.6%91.3%62.6%58.2%
David N. Weidman(3) 367,822 25.6%** **   ** ** ** 
Corliss J. Nelson(3) 135,295 9.4%** **   ** ** ** 
Lyndon B. Cole(3) 143,778 10.0%** **   ** ** ** 
Andreas Pohlmann(3) 118,405 8.2%** **   ** ** ** 
John O'Dwyer(3) 50,745 3.5%** **   ** ** ** 
Chinh E. Chu(4) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
John M. Ballbach(5) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
James Barlett(3) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
Benjamin J. Jenkins(4) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
William H. Joyce(3) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
Anjan Mukherjee(4) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
Paul H. O'Neill(3) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
Hanns Ostmeier(4) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
James A. Quella(4) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
Daniel S. Sanders(3) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons) 844,800 58.8%1.9%1.9%  ** ** ** 

*
We will grant the underwriters an over-allotment option to purchase up to an additional 7,500,000 shares in the Series A common stock offering. If the underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised in full, the Series B common stock will receive a stock dividend, which we intend to declare and pay on or after April 7, 2005,shortly following the expiration of the over-allotment option, of the number of shares of Series A common stock equal to (x) 7,500,000 minus (y) the actual number of shares of Series A common stock the underwriters purchase from us pursuant to that option.

**
Less than 1 percent of shares of common stock outstanding (excluding, in the case of all directors and executive officers individually and as a group, shares beneficially owned by the affiliates of The Blackstone Group and BA Capital Investors Sidecar Fund, L.P.).

(1)
Includes shares of common stock of the Issuer owned by Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 1 ("Cayman 1"), Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 2 ("Cayman 2"), and Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 3 ("Cayman 3" and collectively with Cayman 1 and Cayman 2, the "Cayman Entities"). Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) IV L.P. ("BCP IV") owns 100% of Cayman 1. Blackstone Family Investment Partnership (Cayman) IV-A L.P. ("BFIP") and Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) IV-A L.P. ("BCP IV-A") collectively own 100% of Cayman 2. Blackstone Chemical Coinvest Partners (Cayman) L.P. ("BCCP" and, collectively with BCP IV, BFIP and BCP IV-A, the "Blackstone Funds") owns 100% of Cayman 3. Blackstone Management Associates (Cayman) IV L.P. ("BMA") is the general partner of each of the Blackstone Funds. Blackstone LR Associates (Cayman) IV Ltd. ("BLRA") is the general partner of BMA and may, therefore, be deemed to have shared voting and investment power over shares of common stock of the Issuer. Mr. Chu, who serves as a director of the Issuer and is a member of the supervisory board of Celanese AG, is a non-controlling shareholder of BLRA and disclaims any beneficial