If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: X.

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     .

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     .

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer,” and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One):

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

·

*Paid with initial filing.

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.

¹  Estimated solely for purposed of calculating the registration fee under Rule 457(a) and (o) of the Securities Act.

2

The information contained in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to completion __, 20 102010

1,200,000 SHARES

COMMON STOCK

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

American Business Change Agents, Inc. is offering on a best-efforts basis a minimum of 600,000 and a maximum of 1,200,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.01 per share. The shares are intended to be sold directly through the efforts of Edward A. Sundberg, our president. The intended methods of communication with potential investors include, without limitation, telephone and personal contacts. For more information, see the section of this prospectus entitled "Plan of Distribution."

The proceeds from the sale of the shares in this offering will be payable to Gary B. Wolff, P.C. - Escrow Account. All subscription funds will be held in a noninterest-bearing Account pending the achievement of the Minimum Offering, and no funds shall be released to American Business Change Agents, Inc. until such a time as the minimum proceeds are raised. If the minimum offering is not achieved within 180 days of the date of this prospectus, all subscription funds will be returned to investors promptly without interest or deduction of fees. The Company shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to extend the initial offering period an additional 180 days. Neither the Company nor any subscriber shall receive interest no matter how long subscriber funds might be held. For more information, see the section of this prospectus entitled "Plan of Distribution."

The offering may terminate on the earlier of: (i) the date when the sale of all 1,200,000 shares is completed, (ii) any time after the minimum offering of 600,000 shares of common stock is achieved, or (ii) 180 days from the effective date of this document, or any extension thereto.

There is currently no public or established market for our shares. Consequently, our shareholders will not be able to sell their shares in any organized market place and may be limited to selling their shares privately. Accordingly, an investment in our Company is an illiquid investment.

THIS INVESTMENT INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. YOU SHOULD PURCHASE ONLY IF YOU CAN AFFORD A COMPLETE LOSS OF YOUR INVESTMENT. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 3.

This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is ___, 2010 ..2010.

3

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

About American Business Change Agents, Inc.

American Business Change Agents, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 12, 2009. At  July 15 , 20 10 ,August 24, 2010, we had one employee, our founder and president, Edward A. Sundberg. For the remainder of 2010, , Edward A. Sundberg will devote between 2 020 hours a week and fulltime to us.

American Business Change Agents, Inc. is a development stage company and has no financial resources. We have not established or attempted to establish a source of equity or debt financing. Our auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their Report on our Financial Statements that says “the Company has incurred losses from operations, has negative working capital, and is in need of additional capital to grow its operations so that it can become profitable. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”

Our mission is to provide strategic business planning and management consulting services to small companies. Our president, Mr. Sundberg has more than 20 years of experience providing these types of services and has written a book on the subject entitledWhen Did I Lose My Company? p ublishedpublished July 2006 by Global Project Solutions Group LLC ..LLC.

Our auditors indicated in their Report on our Financial Statements that “the Company has not commenced operations or established a source of revenue, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern .. concern.”

We are not a blank check company, and we have no current intention of engaging in any merger or acquisition. There have been no discussions concerning a merger of any kind, and we have not authorized anyone to have such preliminary discussions on our behalf.

Our executive offices are located at 13070 Addison Road, Roswell, GA 30075, and our telephone number is 404-915-0570. We may refer to ourselves in this prospectus as "ABCA,” the “Company,” "we," or "us .."us.”

The Offering

ABCA is offering, on a best efforts, self-underwritten basis, a minimum of 600,000 and a maximum of 1,200,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.01 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the shares in this offering will be payable to Gary B. Wolff, P.C. - Escrow Account. ABCA’s escrow agent, Gary B. Wolff, P.C., acts as legal counsel for ABCA and, therefore, may not be considered to be an independent third party by purchasers of shares in the offering ..offering. All subscription agreements and checks are irrevocable and should be delivered to Gary B. Wolff, P.C. at the address provided on the Subscription Agreement.

All subscription funds will be held in a noninterest-bearing Account pending the achievement of the Minimum Offering, and no funds shall be released to ABCA until such a time as the minimum proceeds are raised. If the minimum offering is not achieved within 180 days of the date of this prospectus, all subscription funds will be returned to investors promptly without interest or deduction of fees unless the offering is extended. The Company shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to extend the initial offering period for an additional 180 days. Neither the Company nor any subscriber shall receive interest no matter how long subscriber funds might be held.

Any additional proceeds received after the minimum offering is achieved will be immediately released to the Company. The offering may terminate on the earlier of:

(i)

the date when the sale of all 1,200,000 shares is completed,

(ii)

anytime after the minimum offering of 600,000 shares of common stock is achieved, or

(iii)

180 days from the effective date of this document or any extension thereto. If the Minimum Offering is not achieved within 180 days of the date of this prospectus, all subscription funds will be returned to investors promptly without interest or deduction of fees unless the Company extends the offering period an additional 180 days. The Company will deliver stock certificates attributable to shares of common stock purchased directly to the purchasers within 90 days of the close of the offering or as soon thereafter as practicable.

The offering price of the common stock has been determined arbitrarily and bears no relationship to any objective criterion of value. The price does not bear any relationship to our assets, book value, historical earnings or net worth.

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA

The following summary financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

5

RISK FACTORS

You should be aware that there are various risks to an investment in our common stock. You should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, before you decide to invest in shares of our common stock.

If any of the following risks develop into actual events, then our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or prospects could be materially adversely affected. If that happens, the market price of our common stock, if any, could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Risks Related to the Business

1.

ABCA has virtually no financial resources. Our independent registered auditors’ report includes an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

ABCA has virtually no financial resources ..resources. We have negative working capital of $11,937 and a net stockholder’s deficit of $11,937 at January 31, 2010 (and negative working capital and a net stockholder’s deficit of $12,437 at April 30, 2010). Our independent registered auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion on our financial statements as of and for the period ended January 31, 2010 that states that this lack of resources causes substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. No assurances can be given that we will generate sufficient revenue or obtain necessary financing to continue as a going concern.

2.

ABCA is and will continue to be completely dependent on the services of our founder and president, Edward A. Sundberg, the loss of whose services may cause our business operations to cease, and we will need to engage and retain qualified employees and consultants to further implement our strategy.

ABCA’s operations and business strategy are completely dependent upon the knowledge and business connections of Edward A. Sundberg. He is under no contractual obligation to remain employed by us and experienced serious health problems in 2005. If he should choose to leave us for any reason or if he becomes ill and is unable to work for an extended period of time before we have hired additional personnel, our operations will likely fail. Even if we are able to find additional personnel, it is uncertain whether we could find someone who could develop our business along the lines described in this prospectus. We will fail without the services of Mr. Sundberg or an appropriate replacement(s).

We intend to acquire key-man life insurance on the life of Mr. Sundberg naming us as the beneficiary when and if we obtain the resources to do so and if he is insurable. We have not yet procured such insurance, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to obtain such insurance in the future. Accordingly, it is important that we are able to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified and talented personnel and independent contractors.

3.

Because we have only recently commenced business operations, we face a high risk of business failure.

We were formed in January 2009 ..2009. All of our efforts to date have related to developing our business plan and beginning business activities. Through January 31, 2010, our total revenues amounted to $8,100 and, except for $200, were earned entirely from one unrelated client. We face a high risk of business failure.

4.

Most of our competitors, which include large national consulting firms, have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than do we.

Most of our competitors, which include large national accounting and consulting firms, have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than do we. Many have sophisticated Websites and the ability to advertise in a wide variety of media. We will principally depend on the business contacts of our president and word of mouth. There are no assurances that our approach will be successful.

5.

We may face damage to our professional reputation or legal liability if our future clients are not satisfied with our services.

As a consulting service firm, we will depend to a large extent on referrals and new engagements from our clients and will attempt to establish a reputation for high–caliber professional services and integrity to attract and retain clients. As a result, if a client is not satisfied with our services such lack of satisfaction may be more damaging to our business than it may be to other businesses. Moreover, if we fail to meet our obligations, we could be subject to legal liability or loss of client relationships. Our engagements will typically include provisions to limit our exposure to legal claims relating to our services, but these provisions may not protect us or may not be enforceable in all cases. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that we will either obtain or retain clients in the foreseeable future.

6

6.

Our future engagements with clients may not be profitable.

When making proposals for engagements, we plan to estimate the costs and timing for completing the engagements with such estimates intended to reflect our best judgment. Any increased or unexpected costs or unanticipated delays in connection with the performance of these engagements, including delays caused by factors outside our control, could make these engagements less profitable or unprofitable, which would have an adverse effect on our profit margin.

In addition, as consultants, a client will most likely retain us on an engagement–by–engagement basis, rather than under long–term contracts, and a substantial majority of our contracts and engagements, if any, may be terminated by the client with short notice and generally without significant penalty. Furthermore, because large client engagements may involve multiple engagements or stages, there is a risk that a client may choose not to retain us for additional stages of an engagement or that a client will cancel or delay additional planned engagements. These terminations, cancellations or delays could result from factors unrelated to our work product or the progress of the project, but could be related to business or financial conditions of the client or the economy generally. When contracts are terminated, we lose the associated revenues and we may not be able to eliminate associated costs in a timely manner.

7.

There are significant potential conflicts of interest

Our key personnel (currently one person) are required to commit significant time to our affairs and, according­ly, these individual(s) (particularly our president) may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time among various business activities. In the course of other business activities, certain key personnel (particularly our president) may become aware of business opportu­nities which may be appropriate for presenta­tion to us, as well as the other entities with which they are affiliated. As such, there may have con­flicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.

In an effort to resolve such potential conflicts of interest, we have entered into a written agreement with Mr. Sundberg specifying that any business opportunities that he may become aware of independently or directly through his association with us (as opposed to disclosure to him of such business opportunities by management or consultants associated with other entities) would be presented by him solely to us.

We cannot provide assurances that our efforts to eliminate the potential impact of conflicts of interest will be effective.

8.

Because we have nominal assets and no significant revenue, we are considered a "shellcompany" and will be subject to more stringent reporting requirements.

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") adopted Rule 405 of the Securities Act and Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 which defines ashellcompany as a registrant that has no or nominal operations, and either (a) no or nominal assets; (b) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or (c) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets. Our balance sheet reflects that we have no cash or any other asset and, therefore, we are defined as ashellcompany. The new rules prohibit shell companies from using a Form S-8 to register securities pursuant to employee compensation plans. However, the new rules do not prevent us from registering securities pursuant to S-1 registration statements. Additionally, the new rule regarding Form 8-K requires shell companies to provide more detailed disclosure upon completion of a transaction that causes it to cease being ashellcompany. If an acquisition is undertaken (of which we have no current intention of doing), we must file a current report on Form 8-K containing the information required pursuant to Regulation S-K within four business days following completion of the transaction together with financial information of the acquired entity. In order to assist the SEC in the identification of shell companies, we are also required to check a box on Form 10-Q a ndand Form 10-K indicating that we are ashellcompany. To the extent that we are required to comply with additional disclosure because we are ashellcompany, we may be delayed in executing any mergers or acquiring other assets that would cause us to cease being ashellcompany. The SEC adopted a new Rule 144 effective February 15, 2008, which makes resales of restricted securities by shareholdersshar eholders of ashellcompany more difficult.

9.

Edward A. Sundberg, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has no meaningful accounting or financial reporting education or experience and, accordingly, our ability to meet Exchange Act reporting requirements on a timely basis will be dependent to a significant degree upon others.

Edward A. Sundberg has no meaningful financial reporting education or experience. He is and will be heavily dependent on advisors and consultants. As such, there is risk about our ability to comply with all financial reporting requirements accurately and on a timely basis.

7

10.

We intend to become subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that will require us to incur audit fees and legal fees in connection with the preparation of such reports. These additional costs could reduce or eliminate our ability to earn a profit.

Following the effective date of our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, we will be required to file periodic reports with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. In order to comply with these requirements, our independent registered public accounting firm will have to review our financial statements on a quarterly basis and audit our financial statements on an annual basis. Moreover, our legal counsel will have to review and assist in the preparation of such reports. The costs charged by these professionals for such services cannot be accurately predicted at this time because factors such as the number and type of transactions that we engage in and the complexity of our reports cannot be determined at this time and will have a major effect on the amount of time to be spent by our auditors and attorneys. However, the incurrence of such costs will obviously be an expenseex pense to our operations and thus have a negative effect on our ability to meet our overhead requirements and earn a profit. We may be exposed to potential risks resulting from any new requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended by SEC Release 33-8889 on February 1, 2008 we will be required, beginning with our fiscal year ending January 31, 201 12011 (unless the requirement is waived for a further period of time or eliminated for smaller reporting companies), we will be required to include a report of management on our internal control over financial reporting and an attestation report from our registered accounting firm separately on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting. We expect to incur additional expenses and diversion of management’s time as a result of performing the system and process evaluation, testing and remediation required in order to comply with the management certification and auditor attestation requirements.

We do not have a sufficient number of employees to segregate responsibilities and may be unable to afford increasing our staff or engaging outside consultants or professionals to overcome our lack of employees. During the course of our testing, we may identify other deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. In addition, if we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help preve nt financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.

11.

Our internal controls may be inadequate, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

·

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

·

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and/or directors of the Company; and

·

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Our internal controls may be inadequate or ineffective, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public. Investors relying upon this misinformation may make an uninformed investment decision.

8

12.

The costs of being a public company could result in us being unable to continue as a going concern.

As a public company, we will have to comply with numerous financial reporting and legal requirements, including those pertaining to audits and internal control. The costs of this compliance could be significant. If our revenues do not increase and/or we cannot satisfy many of these costs through the issuance of our shares, we may be unable to satisfy these costs in the normal course of business which would result in our being unable to continue as a going concern.

13.

Having only two directors limits our ability to establish effective independent corporate governance procedures and increases the control of our president.

We have only two directors, who are related to each other with Lindsay Chisholm being the daughter of Edward A. Sundberg. Accordingly, we cannot establish board committees comprised of independent members to oversee functions like compensation or audit issues. In addition, a tie vote of board members is decided in favor of the chairman, which gives him significant control over all corporate issues.

Until we have a larger board of directors that would include some independent members, if ever, there will be limited oversight of our president’s decisions and activities and little ability for minority shareholders to challenge or reverse those activities and decisions, even if they are not in the best interests of minority shareholders.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

14.

The Company is selling the shares offered in this prospectus without an underwriter and may not be able to sell any of the shares offered herein.

The common shares are being offered on our behalf by Edward A. Sundberg, president of the Company, on a best-efforts basis. No broker-dealer has been retained as an underwriter and no broker-dealer is under any obligation to purchase any common shares. There are no firm commitments to purchase any of the shares in this offering. Consequently, there is no guarantee that the Company, through its president, is capable of selling all, or any, of the common shares offered hereby.

15.

The offering price of our common stock has been determined arbitrarily.

The price of our common stock in this offering has not been determined by any independent financial evaluation, market mechanism or by our auditors, and is therefore, to a large extent, arbitrary. Our audit firm has not reviewed management's valuation and, therefore, expresses no opinion as to the fairness of the offering price as determined by our management. As a result, the price of the common stock in this offering may not reflect the value perceived by the market. There can be no assurance that the shares offered hereby are worth the price for which they are offered and investors may, therefore, lose a portion or all of their investment

16.

Shareholders may be diluted significantly through our efforts to obtain financing and satisfy obligations through issuance of additional shares of our common stock.

We have no committed source of financing. Wherever possible, our board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations. In many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of restricted shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the authorized (74,000,000 shares) but unissued (63,800,000 shares) assuming the sale of 1,200,000 shares in this offering. In addition, if a trading market develops for our common stock, we may attempt to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, possibly at a discount to market. These actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders, may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material.

17.

The proposed aggregate proceeds of the offering are less than the estimated cost of the offering, so the Company will receive no economic benefits from the completion of the offering.

The proposed aggregate proceeds of the offering ($12,000) are substantially less than the proposed costs to complete the offering ($65,000). We will, therefore, receive no financial benefit from the completion of the offering and will have to pay for some of the costs of the offering from the proceeds of operations or from other sources.

9

18.

The interests of shareholders may be hurt because we can issue shares of our common stock to individuals or entities that support existing management with such issuances serving to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain control of our Company.

Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the authorized but unissued common shares. Such issuances may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management and the interests of existing management which may not be the same as the interests of other shareholders. Our ability to issue shares without shareholder approval serves to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain control of our Company.

19.

Our articles of incorporation provide for indemnification of officers and directors at our expense and limit their liability that may result in a major cost to us and hurt the interests of our shareholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of officers and/or directors.

Our Articles of Incorporation at Article VII provide for indemnification as follows: No director or officer of the Corporation shall be personally liable to the Corporation or any of its stockholders for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer; provided, however, that the foregoing provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director or officer: (i) for acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct, fraud or knowing violation of law; or (ii) the payment of dividends in violation of Section 78.300 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Any repeal or modification of an Article by the stockholders of the Corporation shall be prospective only, and shall not adversely affect any limitation of the personal liability of a director or officer of the Corporation for acts or omissions prior to such repeal or modification.

We have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with our activities, we will (unless in the opinion of our counsel, the matter has been settled by controlling precedent) submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the question whether indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The legal process relating to this matter if it were to occur is likely t o be very costly and may result in us receiving negative publicity, eitherof which factors is likely to materially reduce the market and price for our shares, if such a market ever develops.

20.

Currently, there is no established public market for our securities, and there can be no assurances that any established public market will ever develop or that our common stock will be quoted for trading and, even if quoted, it is likely to be subject to significant price fluctuations.

Prior to the date of this prospectus, there has not been any established trading market for our common stock, and there is currently no established public market whatsoever for our securities. A market maker has filed an application with FINRA on our behalf so as to be able to quote the shares of our common stock on the OTCBB maintained by FINRA commencing upon the effectiveness of our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and the subsequent closing of this offering. There can be no assurance that the market maker’s application will be accepted by FINRA nor can we estimate as to the time period that the application will require. We are not permitted to file such application on our own behalf. If the application is accepted, there can be no assurances as to whether

(i)

any market for our shares will develop;

(ii)

 the prices at which our common stock will trade; or

(i)(iii)

the extent to which investor interest in us will lead to the development of an active, liquid trading market. Active trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and more efficient execution of buy and sell orders for investors. (iv)

If we become able to have our shares of common stock quoted on the OTCBB, we will then try, through a broker-dealer and its clearing firm, to become eligible with the Depository Trust Company ("DTC") to permit our shares to trade electronically. If an issuer is not “DTC-eligible”, then its shares cannot be electronically transferred between brokerage accounts, which, based on the realities of the marketplace as it exists today (especially the OTCBB), means that shares of a company will not be traded (technically the shares can be traded manually between accounts, but this takes days and is not a realistic option for companies relying on broker dealers for stock transactions - like all the companies on the OTCBB). What this boils down to is that while DTC-eligibility is not a requirement to trade on the OTCBB, it is a necessity to process trades on the OTCBB if a company’s stock is going to trade with any volume. There are no assurancesassur ances that our shares will ever become DTC-eligible or, , if they do, how long it will take.

10

In addition, our common stock is unlikely to be followed by any market analysts, and there may be few institutions acting as market makers for our common stock. Either of these factors could adversely affect the liquidity and trading price of our common stock. Until our common stock is fully distributed and an orderly market develops in our common stock, if ever, the price at which it trades is likely to fluctuate significantly. Prices for our common stock will be determined in the marketplace and may be influenced by many factors, including the depth and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock, developments affecting our business, including the impact of the factors referred to elsewhere in these Risk Factors, investor perception of ABCA and general economic and market conditions. No assurances can be given that an orderly or liquid market will ever develop for the shares of our common stock.

Because of the anticipated low price of the securities being registered, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in these securities. Purchasers of our securities should be aware that any market that develops in our stock will be subject to the penny stock restrictions. See “Plan of Distribution” and Risk Factor # 22#22 below.

21.

Any market that develops in shares of our common stock will be subject to the penny stock regulations and restrictions pertaining to low priced stocks that will create a lack of liquidity and make trading difficult or impossible.

The trading of our securities, if any, will be in the over-the-counter market which is commonly referred to as the OTCBB as maintained by FINRA. As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the price of our securities.

Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum bid price of less than $4.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $4.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions which are not available to us. It is likely that our shares will be considered to be penny stocks for the immediately foreseeable future. This classification severely and adversely affects any market liquidity for our common stock.

For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased. In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:

·

the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination, and

·

that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stock in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Additionally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Because of these regulations, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the above-referenced necessary paperwork and disclosures and/or may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which may affect the ability of selling shareholders or other holders to sell their shares in any secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our securities, if and when our securities become publicly traded. In addition, the liquidity for our securities may decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our securities. Our shares, in all probability, will be subject to such penny stock rules for the foreseeable future and our shareholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their securities.

22.

The market for penny stocks has experienced numerous frauds and abuses that could adversely impact investors in our stock.

Company management believes that the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:

·

Control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;

·

Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;

·

"Boiler room" practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by sales persons;

11

·

Excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and

·

Wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.

23.

Any trading market that may develop may be restricted by virtue of state securities “Blue Sky” laws that prohibit trading absent compliance with individual state laws. These restrictions may make it difficult or impossible to sell shares in those states.

There is currently no established public market for our common stock, and there can be no assurance that any established public market will develop in the foreseeable future. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities or securities regulations laws promulgated by various states and foreign jurisdictions, commonly referred to as “Blue Sky” laws. Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our common stock may not be traded in such jurisdictions. Because the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the blue sky laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that there may be significant state blue sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. These restrictions prohibit the secondary trading of ou r common stock. We currently do not intend to and may not be able to qualify securities for resale in at least 17 states which do not offer manual exemptions (or may offer manual exemptions but may not to offer one to us if we are considered to be a shell company at the time of application) and require shares to be qualified before they can be resold by our shareholders. Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary market for our securities to be a limited one. See also “Plan of Distribution-State Securities-Blue Sky Laws.”

24.

Our board of directors has the authority, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with terms that may not be beneficial to common stockholders and with the ability to affect adversely stockholder voting power and perpetuate their control over us.

Our articles of incorporation allow us to issue shares of preferred stock without any vote or further action by our stockholders. Our board of directors has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our board of directors also has the authority to issue preferred stock without further stockholder approval, including large blocks of preferred stock. As a result, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders the preferred right to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common stock.

25.

The ability of our president to control our business may limit or eliminate minority shareholders’ ability to influence corporate affairs.

Upon the completion of this offering, our president will beneficially own an aggregate of approximately 88.2% of our outstanding common stock assuming the sale of all shares being registered. Because of his beneficial stock ownership, our president will be in a position to continue to elect our board of directors, decide all matters requiring stockholder approval and determine our policies. The interests of our president may differ from the interests of other shareholders with respect to the issuance of shares, business transactions with or sales to other companies, selection of officers and directors and other business decisions. The minority shareholders would have no way of overriding decisions made by our president. This level of control may also have an adverse impact on the market value of our shares because our president may institute or undertake transactions, policies or programs that result in losses, may not take any steps to increase our visib ility in the financial community and/or may sell sufficient numbers of shares to significantly decrease our price per share.

26.

All of our presently issued and outstanding common shares are restricted under rule 144 of the securities act, as amended. When the restriction on any or all of these shares is lifted, and the shares are sold in the open market, the price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

All of the presently outstanding shares of common stock (9,000,000 shares) are "restricted securities" as defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act and may only be sold pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from registration, if available. Rule 144 provides in essence that a person who is not an affiliate and has held restricted securities for a prescribed period of at least six months if purchased from a reporting issuer or 12 months (as is the case herein) if purchased from a non-reporting Company, may, under certain conditions, sell all or any of his shares without volume limitation, in brokerage transactions. Affiliates, however, may not sell shares in excess of 1% of the Company’s outstanding common stock each three months. As a result of revisions to Rule 144 which became effective on February 15, 2008, there is no limit on the amount of restricted securities that may be sold by a non-affili ate (i.e., a stockholder who has not been an officer, director or control person for at least 90 consecutive days) after the restricted securities have been held by the owner for the aforementioned prescribed period of time. A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the Act, if available, or pursuant to registration of shares of common stock of present stockholders, may have a depressive effect upon the price of the common stock in any market that may develop.

12

All 9,000,000 issued and outstanding shares of our common stock are owned by our president and may be sold commencing one year from the time the Company is no longer a “shell” company. See “Market for Securities.”

27.

We do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. The future payment of dividends directly depends upon our future earnings, capital requirements, financial requirements and other factors that our board of directors will consider. Since we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock, return on your investment, if any, will depend solely on an increase, if any, in the market value of our common stock.

28.

Because we are not subject to compliance with rules requiring the adoption of certain corporate governance measures, our stockholders have limited protection against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rule changes proposed and enacted by the SEC, the New York and American Stock Exchanges and the Nasdaq Stock Market, as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley, require the implementation of various measures relating to corporate governance. These measures are designed to enhance the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets and apply to securities that are listed on those exchanges or the Nasdaq Stock Market. Because we are not presently required to comply with many of the corporate governance provisions and because we chose to avoid incurring the substantial additional costs associated with such compliance any sooner than legally required, we have not yet adopted these measures.

Because none of our directors are independent directors, we do not currently have independent audit or compensation committees. As a result, these directors have the ability, among other things, to determine their own level of compensation. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest, if any, and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations.

We intend to comply with all corporate governance measures relating to director independence as and when required. However, we may find it very difficult or be unable to attract and retain qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in a series of rules and regulations by the SEC that increase responsibilities and liabilities of directors and executive officers. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may make it more costly or deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles.

29.

You may have limited access to information regarding our business because our obligations to file periodic reports with the SEC could be automatically suspended under certain circumstances.

As of effectiveness of our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, , we will be required to file periodic reports with the SEC which will be immediately available to the public for inspection and copying (see “Where You Can Find More Information” elsewhere in this prospectus). Except during the year that our registration statement becomes effective, these reporting obligations may (in our discretion) be automatically suspended under Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 if we have less than 300 shareholders and do not file a registration statement on Form 8A ..8A. If this occurs after the year in which our registration statement becomes effective, we will no longer be obligated to file periodic reports with the SEC and your access to our business information would then be even more restricted. After this registration statement on Form S-1 becomes effective, we will be required to deliver periodic reports to security holders. However, we will not be required to furnish proxy statements to security holders and our directors, officers and principal beneficial owners will not be required to report their beneficial ownership of securities to the SEC pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 until we have both 500 or more security holders and greater than $10 million in assets. This means that your access to information regarding our business will be limited.

For all of the foregoing reasons and others set forth herein, an investment in our securities in any market that may develop in the future involves a high degree of risk.

13

USE OF PROCEEDS

ABCA will apply the proceeds from the offering to pay for accounting fees, legal and professional fees associated with the offering. The total estimated costs of the offering ($65,000) exceed the maximum amount of offering proceeds ($12,000). ABCA will pay all costs relating to this offering. This amount in excess of offering proceeds ($53,000) will be paid as and when necessary and required or otherwise accrued on the books and records of ABCA until we are able to pay the full amount due either from revenues or loans from our president. Absent sufficient revenues to pay these amounts within six months of the date of this prospectus, our president has agreed to loan us the funds to cover the balance of outstanding professional and related fees relating to our prospectus to the extent that such liabilities cannot be extended or satisfied in other ways and our professionals insist upon payment. If and when loaned, the loan will be evidenced by a noninterest-bearingnoninterest - -bearing unsecured corporate note to be treated as a loan until repaid, if and when ABCA has the financial resources to do so. A formal written arrangement exists with respect to our president’s commitment to loan funds for this purpose and, accordingly, the agreement between ABCA, our president and our counsel (filed as Exhibit 10.1) is binding upon all parties.

Our plans will not change regardless of whether the minimum/maximum proceeds are raised, except to the extent that as indicated in MD&A “Liquidity” section, first paragraph, the Company’s President is responsible for all costs relating to the offering if same are not paid within six months of the effective date of the Company’s Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part.

THE OFFERING

ABCA is offering, on a best efforts, self-underwritten basis, a minimum of 600,000 and a maximum of 1,200,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.01 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the shares in this offering will be payable to “Gary B. Wolff, P.C. – Escrow Account” and will be deposited in a noninterest-bearing bank account until the minimum offering proceeds are raised. No interest shall be paid to any investor or to the Company. All subscription agreements and checks are irrevocable and should be delivered to Gary B. Wolff, P.C. at the address provided on the Subscription Agreement. Failure to do so will result in checks being returned to the investor who submitted the check. ABCA’s escrow agent, Gary B. Wolff, P.C., acts as outside legal counsel for ABCA and, therefore, may not be considered an independent third party.

All subscription funds will be held in escrow pending the achievement of the Minimum Offering, and no funds shall be released to ABCA until such a time as the minimum proceeds are raised (see the section of this prospectus entitled "Plan of Distribution"). Any additional proceeds received after the minimum offering is achieved will be immediately released to the Company. The offering may terminate on the earlier of:

If the Minimum Offering is not achieved within 180 days of the date of this prospectus, all subscription funds will be returned to investors promptly without interest or deduction of fees unless the Company extends the offering period by an additional 180 days. The Company will deliver stock certificates attributable to shares of common stock purchased directly to the purchasers within 90 days of the close of the offering.

The offering price of the common stock has been determined arbitrarily and bears no relationship to any objective criterion of value. The price does not bear any relationship to our assets, book value, historical earnings or net worth.

The purchase of the common stock in this offering involves a high degree of risk. The common stock offered in this prospectus is for investment purposes only, and currently no market for our common stock exists. While a market maker has filed a Rule 211 application with FINRA in order to apply for the inclusion of our common stock in the OTCBB, such efforts may not be successful, and our shares may never be quoted and owners of our common stock may not have a market in which to sell the shares. Also, no estimate may be given as to the time that this application process will require.

If we become able to have our shares of common stock quoted on the OTCBB, we will then try, through a broker-dealer and its clearing firm, to become eligible with the DTC to permit our shares to trade electronically. If an issuer is not “DTC-eligible”, then its shares cannot be electronically transferred between brokerage accounts, which, based on the realities of the marketplace as it exists today (especially the OTCBB), means that shares of a company will not be traded (technically the shares can be traded manually between accounts, but this takes days and is not a realistic option for companies relying on broker dealers for stock transactions - like all the companies on the OTCBB). What this boils down to is that while DTC-eligibility is not a requirement to trade on the OTCBB, it is a necessity to process trades on the OTCBB if a company’s stock is going to trade with any volume. There are no assurances that our shares will ever become DTC-eligible or, if they do, how long it will take.

14

Please refer to the sections of this prospectus entitled "Risk Factors" and "Dilution" before making an investment in this stock.

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

The offering price of the common stock has been arbitrarily determined and bears no relationship to any objective criterion of value. The price does not bear any relationship to our assets, book value, historical earnings or net worth. In determining the offering price, management considered such factors as the prospects, if any, for similar companies, anticipated results of operations, present financial resources and the likelihood of acceptance of this offering. No valuation or appraisal has been prepared for our business. We cannot assure you that a public market for our securities will develop or continue or that the securities will ever trade at a price higher than the offering price.

DILUTION

"Dilution" represents the difference between the offering price of the shares of common stock and the net book value per share of common stock immediately after completion of the offering. "Net book value" is the amount that results from subtracting total liabilities from total assets. In this offering, the level of dilution is increased as a result of the relatively low book value of our issued and outstanding stock and because the proceeds of the offering are substantially less than the estimated costs ..costs. Assuming the shares offered herein are sold, the purchasers of the common stock in this offering will lose the entire value of their share purchase in that each purchased share will have a negative book value of ($0.0072) if the minimum number of shares is sold and ($0.0062) if the maximum number of shares is sold. The book value of existing shareholders’ shares will also lose value from ($0.0011) to ($0.0072) if the minimum numbernumb er of shares is sold and ($0.0062) if the maximum number of shares is sold because the cost of the Offering will exceed the proceeds received.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never paid cash or any other form of dividend on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Moreover, any future credit facilities might contain restrictions on our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common stock. We plan to retain all earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future for use in the operation of our business and to fund the pursuit of future growth. Future dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, capital requirements and on such other factors as our board of directors, in its discretion, may consider relevant.

MARKET FOR SECURITIES

There is no established public market for our common stock, and a public market may never develop. A market maker has filed an application with FINRA so as to be able to quote the shares of our common stock on the OTCBB maintained by FINRA commencing upon the effectiveness of our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and the subsequent closing of this offering. There can be no assurance as to whether such market maker’s application will be accepted by FINRA nor can we estimate the time period that will be required for the application process. Even if our common stock were quoted in a market, there may never be substantial activity in such market. If there is substantial activity, such activity may not be maintained, and no prediction can be made as to what prices may prevail in such market.

If we become able to have our shares of common stock quoted on the OTCBB, we will then try, through a broker-dealer and its clearing firm, to become eligible with the DTC to permit our shares to trade electronically. If an issuer is not “DTC-eligible”, then its shares cannot be electronically transferred between brokerage accounts, which, based on the realities of the marketplace as it exists today (especially the OTCBB), means that shares of a company will not be traded (technically the shares can be traded manually between accounts, but this takes days and is not a realistic option for companies relying on broker dealers for stock transactions - like all the companies on the OTCBB). What this boils down to is that while DTC-eligibility is not a requirement to trade on the OTCBB, it is a necessity to process trades on the OTCBB if a company’s stock is going to trade with any volume. There are no assurances that our shares will ever become DTC-eligible or, if they do, how long it will take.

There is no ABCAcommon equity subject to outstanding options or warrants to purchase or securities convertible into our common equity. Also, all current shares of outstanding shares are held by Edward A. Sundberg, our president. In general, under Rule 144, a holder of restricted common shares who is an affiliate at the time of the sale or any time during the three months preceding the sale can resell shares, subject to the restrictions described below.

If we have been a public reporting company under the Exchange Act for at least 90 days immediately before the sale, then at least six months must have elapsed since the shares were acquired from us or one of our affiliates, and we must remain current in our filings for an additional period of six months; in all other cases, at least one year must have elapsed since the shares were acquired from us or one of our affiliates.

15

The number of shares sold by such person within any three-month period cannot exceed the greater of:

·

1% of the total number of our common shares then outstanding; or

·

The average weekly trading volume of our common shares during the four calendar weeks preceding the date on which notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale is filed with the SEC (or, if Form 144 is not required to be filed, the four calendar weeks preceding the date the selling broker receives the sell order) This condition is not currently available to the Company because its securities do not trade on a recognized exchange.

Conditions relating to the manner of sale, notice requirements (filing of Form 144 with the SEC) and the availability of public information about us must also be satisfied.

All of the presently outstanding shares of our common stock are "restricted securities" as defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act and may only be sold pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from registration, if available. The SEC has adopted final rules amending Rule 144 which have become effective on February 15, 2008. Pursuant to the new Rule 144, one year must elapse from the time a “shellcompany”, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act and Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, ceases to be a “shellcompany” and files a Form 8-K addressing Item 5.06 with such information as may be required in a Form 10 Registration Statement with the SEC, before a restricted shareholder can resell their holdings in reliance on Rule 144. Form 10 information is equivalent to information that a company would be requi red to file if it were registering a class of securities on Form 10 under the Exchange Act. Under the amended Rule 144, restricted or unrestricted securities, that were initially issued by a reporting or non-reportingshellcompany or a company that was at anytime previously a reporting or non-reportingshellcompany, can only be resold in reliance on Rule 144 if the following conditions are met:

1)

the issuer of the securities that was formerly a reporting or non-reportingshellcompany has ceased to be ashellcompany;

2)

the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;

3)

the issuer of the securities has filed all reports and material required to be filed under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as applicable, during the preceding twelve months (or shorter period that the Issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Form 8-K reports; and

4)

at least one year has elapsed from the time the issuer filed the current Form 10 type information with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not ashellcompany.

At the present time, we are classified as a “shellcompany” under Rule 405 of the Securities Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. As such, all restricted securities presently held by the founder of our company may not be resold in reliance on Rule 144 until: (1) we file a Form 8-K addressing Item 5.06 with such information as may be required in a Form 10 Registration Statement with the SEC when we cease to be a “shellcompany”; (2) we have filed all reports as required by Section 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Act for twelve consecutive months; and (3) one year has elapsed from the time we file the Form 8-K with the SEC reflecting our status as an entity that is not ashellcompany.

Current Public Information

In general, for sales by affiliates and non-affiliates, the satisfaction of the current public information requirement depends on whether we are a public reporting company under the Exchange Act:

·

If we have been a public reporting company for at least 90 days immediately before the sale, then the current public information requirement is satisfied if we have filed all periodic reports (other than Form 8-K) required to be filed under the Exchange Act during the 12 months immediately before the sale (or such shorter period as we have been required to file those reports).

·

If we have not been a public reporting company for at least 90 days immediately before the sale, then the requirement is satisfied if specified types of basic information about us (including our business, management and our financial condition and results of operations) are publicly available.

However, no assurance can be given as to :to:

·

the likelihood of a market for our common shares developing,

·

the liquidity of any such market,

·

the ability of the shareholders to sell the shares, or

·

the prices that shareholders may obtain for any of the shares.

No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of shares or the availability of shares for future sale will have on the market price prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of the common shares.

16

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus which is a part of our registration statement involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

·

our future operating results;

·

our business prospects;

·

any contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

·

the dependence of our future success on the general economy;

·

any possible financings; and

·

the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital.

These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as we “believe," “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are described in close proximity to such statements and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this prospectus. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of this prospectus, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Operations

We were incorporated on January 12, 2009. All of the activity through January 31, 2009 involved incorporation efforts, , planning and activities discussed herein under the heading “Business – Initial Contracts.”

We began generating revenues from its planned principal operations during the six months ended July 31, 2009. We are a development stage company and have no financial resources. We have not established a source of equity or debt financing. Our independent registered auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their report emphasizing the uncertainty of our ability to remain a going concern.

Our mission is to provide strategic business planning and management consulting services to small companies. Our president, Mr. Sundberg has more than 20 years experience providing these types of services and has written a book on the subject entitledWhen Did I Lose My Company?

For the year ended January 31, 2010 and the period from January 12, 2009 (inception) to January 31, 2009, our operations were as follows:

Except for $200, all of the revenue was earned from one unrelated client. There is no way to predict the likelihood that revenues will increase significantly in future periods.

All compensation was paid to our president. For the period ended January 31, 2009, the compensation consisted of the issuance of 9,000,000 shares of our common stock.

17

For the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, our operations were as follows:

All of the revenue was earned from one unrelated client. There is no way to predict the likelihood that revenues will increase significantly in future periods.

All compensation was paid to our president.

Other

As a corporate policy,we will not incur any cash obligations that we cannot satisfy with known resources, of which there are currently none except as described in “Liquidity” below and/or elsewhere in this prospectus. We believe that the perception that many people have of a public company make it more likely that they will accept restricted securities from a public company as consideration for indebtedness to them than they would from a private company. We have not performed any studies of this matter. Our conclusion is based on our own observations. However, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in any of those efforts even if we are a public entity. Additionally, issuance of restricted shares would necessarily dilute the percentage of ownership interest of our stockholders.

Liquidity

ABCA has a loan payable of $7,220 due to an unrelated party. The loan bears interest at 4% per annum and is payable on demand. There is no commitment or likelihood that the lender will provide additional funds to us if needed.

ABCA will pay all costs relating to this offering estimated at $65,000. This amount will be paid as and when necessary and required or otherwise accrued on the books and records of ABCA until we are able to pay the full amount due either from revenues or loans from our president. Absent sufficient revenues to pay these amounts within six months of the date of this prospectus, our president has agreed to loan us the funds to cover the balance of outstanding professional and related fees relating to our prospectus to the extent that such liabilities cannot be extended or satisfied in other ways and our professionals insist upon payment. If and when loaned, the loan will be evidenced by a noninterest-bearing unsecured corporate note to be treated as a loan until repaid, if and when ABCA has the financial resources to do so. A formal written arrangement exists with respect to our president’s commitment to loan funds for this purpose and, accordingly, the agreement between ABCA, our president and our counsel (filed as Exhibit 10.1) is binding upon all parties.

Private capital, if sought, will be sought from former business associates of our founder or private investors referred to us by those business associates. To date, we have not sought any funding source and have not authorized any person or entity to seek out funding on our behalf. If a market for our shares ever develops, of which there can be no assurances, we may use restricted shares of our common stock to compensate employees/consultants and independent contractors wherever possible. We believe that operations are generating sufficient cash to continue operations for the next 12 months from the date of this prospectus provided that our costs of being a public company remain equal to or below the maximum estimate provided below.

18

We have embarked upon an effort to become a public company and, by doing so, have incurred and will continue to incur additional significant expenses for legal, accounting and related services. Once we become a public entity, subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act of '34, we will incur ongoing expenses associated with professional fees for accounting, legal and a host of other expenses including annual reports and proxy statements, if required. We estimate that these costs will range up to $50,000 per year for the next few years and will be higher if our business volume and activity increases but lower during the first year of being public because our overall business volume will be lower, and we will not yet be subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These obligations will reduce our ability and resources to expand our business. We hope to be able to use our status as a public company to increase our ability to use noncash means of settling obligations and compensate independent contractors who provide professional services to us, although there can be no assurances that we will be successful in any of those efforts. We will reduce the compensation levels paid to management if there is insufficient cash generated from operations to satisfy these costs.

There are no current plans to seek private investment. We do not have any current plans to raise funds through the sale of securities except as set forth herein. We hope to be able to use our status as a public company to enable us to use non-cash means of settling obligations and compensate persons and/or firms providing services to us, although there can be no assurances that we will be successful in any of those efforts. We believe that the perception that many people have of a public company make it more likely that they will accept restricted securities from a public company as consideration for indebtedness to them than they would from a private company. We have not performed any studies of this matter. Our conclusion is based on our own beliefs. Issuing shares of our common stock to such persons instead of paying cash to them would increase our chances to expand our business. Having shares of our common stock may also give persons a greater feeling of identity with us which may result in referrals. However, these actions, if successful, will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders, may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material. Such issuances may also serve to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain control of ABCA because the shares may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management. ABCA may offer shares of its common stock to settle a portion of the professional fees incurred in connection with its registration statement. No negotiations have taken place with any professional and no assurances can be made as to the likelihood that any professional will accept shares in settlement of obligations due them. There are no other significant liabilities outside of standard vendor obligations outstanding at April 30, 2010.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2003, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as amended by SEC Release Nos.: 33-8889 and 33-8934. Commencing with our annual report for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2011 (unless the requirement is waived for a further period of time or eliminated for smaller reporting companies), we will be required to include a report of management on our internal control over financial reporting and an attestation report from our registered accounting firm separately on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement.

§

of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting;

§

of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of year end; and

§

of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

In June 2009, the FASB approved theFASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04,Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99 which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98,Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities ... The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05,Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:

19

1. A valuation technique that uses:

a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset

b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets.

2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability.

The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08,Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99,which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53,Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42,The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock ... The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09,Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees ... This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4,Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee ... Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent), which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantiallysub stantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restricti onsrestrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whetherwheth er the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification. The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification. The correction moves guidance thattha t was previously included in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary. That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders. It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.

20

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:

The amendments in this Update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses:

If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related notes requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements.

Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. There are no critical policies or decisions that rely on judgments that are based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made. Note 2to the financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus, includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements.

Seasonality

We have not noted a significant seasonal impact in our business although having just commenced operations it is too early to tell.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, obligations under any guarantee contracts or contingent obligations. We also have no other commitments, other than the costs of being a public company that will increase our operating costs or cash requirements in the future.

BUSINESS

ABCA was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 12, 2009. At  July 15, 20 10 ,August 24, 2010, we had one employee, our founder and president, Edward A. Sundberg. For the remainder of 20 10 ,2010, Edward A. Sundberg will devote between 2 020 hours a week and fulltime to us.

21

ABCA is a development stage company and has no significant financial resources. We have not established or attempted to establish a source of equity or debt financing. Our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their report emphasizing the uncertainty of our ability to remain a going concern.

Our mission is to provide strategic business planning and management consulting services to small companies. Our president, Mr. Sundberg has more than 20 years of experience providing these types of services and has written a book on the subject entitledWhen Did I Lose My Company? ...

We anticipate that we will rely on one or a small number of engagements and clients for the indefinite future. There is no assurance that these clients will provide us with sufficient levels of revenue to generate profits or even to sustain operations.

Strategy

Our goal will be to provide management consulting services to small and midsized businesses. Our advice will principally relate to corporate structure, personnel issues and marketing. In some instances, we may serve in the role of a corporate official at a client in order to design and implement a plan, while in other cases we will issue a written business plan to our client.

We will not concentrate on any particular industry or limit ourselves to any geographic area. If necessary, we will team with other consultants if an engagement requires knowledge or resources that we do not have.

We will use the contacts of our chairman, Edward A. Sundberg, to identify initial clients. Our founder has more than 20 years of experience in providing a variety of consulting services to clients. His experience includes:

·

Preparing detailed business plans for small and midsized businesses;

·

Assisting turnaround efforts;

·

Assisting companies operate in international environments;

·

Providing organizational services to small and large entities;

·

Assisting companies prepare for financings and acquisitions; and

·

Providing extensive human resource services.

Our approach will be to focus on small and midsized companies that need structure and would benefit from our broad range of business contacts. We will:

·

work with client executives to develop risk management and business performance strategies. Among the services we intend to provide are strategic consulting with regard to the design and structure of the finance function, particularly restructuring in turnaround situations, acquisition and post-merger integration. This process, which leverages the experience of our president, will help clients to align their companies’ resources and capabilities with their business objectives. Our services will also address pricing and yield management, billing, credit risk and collection effectiveness, lending and debt recovery.

·

work with clients to solve human performance issues that are crucial to their operational success, including recruiting and motivating key employees and management. We will work to provide human resources, knowledge management, and learning and performance management solutions that increase the efficiency and effectiveness of our clients’ employees and operations, while reducing recruiting and training costs.

We expect to function with a wide array of client situations and use independent subcontractors to assist in performing engagements.

Competition

Competition in our industry is intense and most of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than do we. Competition will come from a wide variety of consulting and accounting firms, many of which have more employees, finances and other resources and greater name recognition that do we. We intend to compete based on the reputation and contacts of our founder and the creative and practical approach to services that we offer. Our founder has more than 20 years of experience in providing a variety of consulting services to corporations.

No assurances can be given that our competitive strategy will be successful.

Intellectual Property

We have no patents or trademarks.

22

Employees

At  July 15,August 24, 2010, , we had one employee, our founder and president, Edward A. Sundberg. In 2010, , Edward A. Sundberg will devote between 2 020 hours a week and fulltime to us. Mr. Sundberg will devote the time necessary to complete engagements to us, but is involved with other ventures. Various aspects of engagements may be subcontracted to independent consultants.

Lindsay Chisholm, our director, is the daughter of Edward A. Sundberg. She may perform some work for us on subcontract basis.

There is no written employment contract or agreement.

Property

Our office and mailing address is 13070 Addison Road, Roswell, GA 30075. The space is provided to us by Mr. Sundberg. Mr. Sundberg incurs no incremental costs as a result of our using the space. Therefore, he does not charge us for its use. There is no written lease agreement.

Litigation

We are not party to any pending, or to our knowledge, threatened litigation of any type.

Initial Contracts

(a)

Contract with RealEstateContacts.com, Inc.

On March 19, 2009 we entered into our initial contract to provide consulting services to RealEstateContacts.com, Inc. (“CLIENT”) an unaffiliated firm located in New Castle, PA.

CLIENT is a development stage online real estate advertising and marketing company that offers real estate professionals, offices, brokerages, agents and mortgage brokers and lenders the opportunity to reach consumers interested in buying or selling their home and property in their local or geographical area.

We, in cooperation with other firms, mutually acceptable to both parties, have agreed to arrange performance of business, consulting and strategic advisory and related services to be rendered to CLIENT, as CLIENT may reasonably request.

The Agreement which refers to us as ABCA provides in part as follows: i. ABCA Group will familiarize itself with the CLIENT platform including the operational, and financial plans of CLIENT; ii. ABCA Group will advise and assist CLIENT in developing any strategic partnership presentation, a general marketing and negotiating strategy for accomplishing the establishment of and structuring of the initial capitalization; iii. ABCA Group will advise and assist CLIENT in identifying potential Partner(s) and will, on behalf of CLIENT, contact such potential Partner(s); iv. ABCA Group will assist CLIENT in the preparation of “talking points” or marketing memorandum (the “Presentation”) for distribution to potential Partner(s) selected by ABCA and CLIENT, describing the CLIENT platform. CLIENT will review and approve the “talking points” prior to submission to any potential Partner(s); v. ABCA Group will make appointments with potenti al Partner(s) and will also respond to follow-up questions and data requests from such potential Partner(s); vi. ABCA Group will advise and assist CLIENT in the course of CLIENT’S negotiations with a potential Partner, the basic structuring of the company and outline the preparation needed for capitalization, documents, and if requested by CLIENT, will participate in such negotiations; and vii. ABCA Group will consult CLIENT regarding such other business, consulting and financial advisory and merchant banking services.

In return for such services, CLIENT has agreed to pay us $200 per month for a period of six months commencing at a date to be determined. As of January 31, 2010, we had earned and received one monthly payment.

CLIENT has agreed to additionally pay a “Success Fee” in the event that we are instrumental in the creation of a Strategic Partner, on behalf of CLIENT, with the F eeFee being equal to 7% of revenues generated from projects implemented by CLIENT through our efforts.

Notwithstanding the statements contained herein, the only fees that may be considered a certainty at this point are the aforementioned retainer fees.

The foregoing sets forth what management believes to be the pertinent points of our initial contract, but does not purport to be a complete summary thereof.

23

b)

Contract with S&S Team Sports, Inc.

On April 19, 2009, we entered into our second contract to provide consulting services to S& S Team Sports, Inc. (“S&S”), an unaffiliated company located at 11005 Jones Bridge Road, Suite 105, Alpharetta Georgia 30022 which provid esprovides retail sports merchandise to individuals and teams.

In that regard, the Issuer has agreed to identify programs to improve efficiency and effectiveness of internal controls and practices, and to provide the business, consulting and strategic advisory related aspects of the work, control systems and overall project management; such services to be provided on an exclusive basis to S&S’ particular industry and platform niche.

Issuer has agreed to provide each of the following business, consulting and strategic advisory and related services:

a.

Issuer will familiarize itself with S&S’ platform including the operational and financial plans of S&S;

b.

Issuer will advise and assist S&S in developing any strategic partnership presentation, a general marketing and negotiating strategy for accomplishing the establishment of and structuring of additional capitalization;

c.

Issuer will advise and assist S&S in determining the proper management programs needed to improve staff performance and will, on behalf of S&S work with selected employees to improve performance;

d.

Issuer will advise and assist S&S in the course of S&S’ negotiations with any potential store buyer or investor, the basic structuring of the company and outline the preparation needed for capitalization documents, and if requested by S&S, will participate in such negotiations; and

e.

Issuer will consult S&S regarding such other business, consulting and related services as requested.

It is anticipated that the scope of work will be divided into two general phases.

Phase I:

Together with S&S, Issuer will: (1) prepare a presentation summary for the comprehensive strategic plan of S&S including projected revenue streams; (ii) analyze the existing presentation material as needed for a clearer focus on the capital and financial structure of S&S and the terms of funding, and: (iii) gather structuring feedback from select financing sources.

Phase II:

During this phase, together with S&S, Issuer will arrange and conduct meetings with a number of employees, finalize the elements needed for improving performance and the financial structuring contents.

Issuer is to receive a monthly retainer fee of $700 until such time as prio rprior receivables approximating $56,618 have been paid to Issuer. The Agreement was effective as of April 19, 2009 and is scheduled to continue in effect through December 31, 2011. Substantially all of our revenues earned during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 related to this agreement.

For further information regarding S&S, reference is made to its website www.ssteamsports.com which indicates that S&S has been in business since 1999 and works with approximately 120 vendors and carries equipment and accessories for 8 major sports.

The foregoing sets forth what management believes to be the pertinent points of our second contract, but does not purport to a complete summary thereof.

c)

Operating Plan

While our operating plan is in its formative stages, the goal of the Issuer is to achieve a $10,000 a month operating plan through the development of five or fewer clients at the same time needing the services of the Issuer. The services of the Issuer specifically relate to the improvement of the performance of the businesses of its clients from their respective existing operations.

Target markets include the turnarounds of businesses that are at or near default of their loans to major banks. Before being taken over by the “work-out” group of the lending institution we plan to develop an analysis of the business operations using proprietary analytical techniques from the business operating matrix as described in the book: “When Did I Lose My Company”, page 9, authored by our President. From each analysis a plan is, or will be developed for the client detailing how to arrive at better operating results. A flat fee of $10,000 to $15,000 is, or will be charged for the analysis. If the client is not able to implement the plan on its own, Issuer will offer a structured process for improving the operations and results of the client to include setting standards, building measurements to those standards, implementing the new operating requirements or organizational changes, writing and training to new procedures, set a pa y for performance standard and goal for each employee with direct profit responsibilities, and training the employees to perform to the new procedures. The changes will be monitored to include a daily “snap shot” of the business performance, primarily a look at cash flows.

The Issuer initial clients consist of (i): a start-up business in the development of a revenue producing web-site in the real estate field; and (ii) a retail sporting goods operations. (See “Business - Initial Contracts” above.)

24

As indicated above, the Issuer has contracted with a small retail operation in sporting goods equipment and clothing to include the daily supervision of the owner’s management development to become a better leader and manager and to provide advisory services in cash management, inventory controls, store operations, new store locations, and seasonal product planning.

ABCA sends letters periodically to the area and regional banks and lending institutions offering services to support the businesses that are at risk of losing their bank loans.

ABCA had established milestones for the first six months to have two clients which it has met.

ABCA’s goal is to have four principal clients by the end of 2010, , although no assurance can be made that it will meet or come close to its targeted goals, especially if the nation’s economy does not begin expanding significantly ..significantly. We have noted from our own observations that consulting services are widely considered to be discretionary expenses. During recessionary periods and times of slow economic growth, companies tend not to incur discretionary commitments. Therefore, we do not believe that is feasible or practical to establish milestones nor or we in a position to predict or estimate the likelihood of success or the amount of time that will be necessary to achieve success with regard to initial goals.

(d)

Method of Acquiring Clients, Milestones, Anticipated Time Frame and Estimated Expenses:

ABCA has six fundamental approaches to executing its business plan:

1)

market services through the defaulted or critical loan departments in commercial banks

2)

market services through local branches of law firms who may have clients needing improvements to internal growth strategies

3)

market through accounting firms who have access to clients who may have needs for improved performance

4)

market through existing consulting firms to improve their capacity to deliver quality services

5)

market through advertising agencies who have clients needing an improved outlook on their markets.

6)

directly contact businesses with a directed program for getting their attention to profit improvement (Business Journal identifies the top ten firms in each major category in Atlanta with all contact information)

The message is intended to establish ABCA as an experienced resource to be used as needed by other professional firms to enhance their relationships with their customers. The consulting technique relies heavily on methods proven and established by David Sandler through his book…”You Can’t Teach A Kid To Ride A Bike At A Seminar” (believed to be one of the most powerful selling techniques on the market).

The goal is to single out three firms or contacts a week in the local Atlanta area to minimize costs. Develop client contact profiles and establish a first meeting to present the program to them.

To date, ABCA has contacted and begun working with The Titan Agency (an advertising firm), Open Ocean Advisors (a consulting firm) and HWH CPA (an accounting firm), A proposal through Open Ocean is being crafted to one of their clients for an introductory review of their Business Plan to be followed by a detailed program for improving their “Go To Market” Strategy.

Monthly cost is approximately $450 for telephones and travel.

Monthly revenue currently ranges from $200 to $900 with $400 in receivables.

This description as to acquiring clients is as complete as possible when considering that we are in the development stage and are operating in a very volatile economy. These factors make it premature to indicate milestones accurately or predict timeframes for the achievement of milestones. While we cannot fully estimate expenses, our president has agreed to pay expenses for us if revenues are insufficient to meet the obligations.

e)

Source of Funds

With respect to all information referred to under sub-heading “Initial Contracts” (a through c inclusive) it is the Issuer’s intention to keep expenses in line with revenues (approximating $900 per month). If additional funding is needed, Issuer’s President has orally agreed to provide any additional required funds personally and Issuer will keep a running account for repayment if and when revenue stream increases.

25

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

Our management consists of:

Edward A. Sundberg –founded us in January 2009. He has been performing consulting work for a variety of firms owned by him since 1988. Since 2002, he has been a managing partner of Titan International LLC, an Atlanta based project management and business strategy advisory firm and the owner, since 1992, of Sundberg Communications Co. Inc., a private consulting company. He was chairman and president of ConsultAmerica, Inc., a consulting firm that went public in April 2005. In August 2005, Mr. Sundberg underwent open heart bypass surgery shortly after which ConsultAmerica, Inc. was sold. Upon recovery, Mr. Sundberg resumed consulting for firms owned by him. He is a graduate of the United States Naval Academy and holds an MBA from Boston University.

Lindsay Chisholm – became a director in January 2009. She was an officer and director in ConsultAmerica, Inc. in 2005. She is a graduate of Connecticut College and received a JD from Massachusetts School of Law in 2008. Since 2005, she has performed various contract services for businesses owned by Edward A. Sundberg. Lindsay Chisholm is the daughter of Edward A. Sundberg.

Possible Potential Conflicts

The OTCBB on which we plan to have our shares of common stock quoted does not have any director independence requirements.

No member of management will be required by us to work on a full time basis, although our president currently devotes at least 30 hours a week to us. Accordingly, certain conflicts of interest may arise between us and our officer(s) and director(s) in that they may have other business interests in the future to which they devote their attention, and they may be expected to continue to do so although management time must also be devoted to our business. As a result, conflicts of interest may arise that can be resolved only through their exercise of such judgment as is consistent with each officer's understanding of his/her fiduciary duties to us.

Currently we have only two officers and two directors (the same persons), who are related to each other, and will seek to add additional officer(s) and/or director(s) as and when the proper personnel are located and terms of employment are mutually negotiated and agreed, and we have sufficient capital resources and cash flow to make such offers.

In an effort to resolve potential conflicts of interest, we have entered into a written agreement with Mr. Sundberg specifying that any business opportunities that he may become aware of independently or directly through his association with us (as opposed to disclosure to him of such business opportunities by management or consultants associated with other entities) would be presented by him solely to us.

We cannot provide assurances that our efforts to eliminate the potential impact of conflicts of interest will be effective.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

In January 2009 we adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct which is applicable to our future employees and which also includes a Code of Ethics for our CEO and principal financial officers and persons performing similar functions. A code of ethics is a written standard designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

·

honest and ethical conduct,

·

full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in regulatory filings and public statements,

·

compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations,

·

the prompt reporting violation of the code, and

·

accountability for adherence to the code.

A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibit 14.1 to our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

26

Board of Directors

All directors hold office until the completion of their term of office, which is not longer than one year, or until their successors have been elected. Both directors’ terms of office expire on January 31, 201 1 ..2011. All officers are appointed annually by the board of directors and, subject to existing employment agreements (of which there are currently none) and serve at the discretion of the board. Currently, directors receive no compensation for their role as directors but may receive compensation for their role as officers.

As long as we have an even number of directors, tie votes on issues are resolved in favor of the chairman’s vote.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Except as described below, during the past five years, no present director, executive officer or person nominated to become a director or an executive officer of ABCA:

1.

had a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

2.

was convicted in a criminal proceeding or subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3.

was subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from or otherwise limiting his involvement in any of the following activities:

i.

acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

ii.

engaging in any type of business practice; or

iii.

engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state securities laws or federal commodities laws; or

4.

was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of an federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (3) (i), above, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity; or

5.

was found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and for which the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Concurrent with having sufficient members and resources, the ABCA board of directors will establish an audit committee and a compensation committee. We believe that we will need a minimum of five directors to have effective committee systems. The audit committee will review the results and scope of the audit and other services provided by the independent auditors and review and evaluate the system of internal controls. The compensation committee will manage any stock option plan we may establish and review and recommend compensation arrangements for the officers. No final determination has yet been made as to the memberships of these committees or when we will have sufficient members to establish committees. See “Executive Compensation” hereinafter.

All directors will be reimbursed by ABCA for any expenses incurred in attending directors' meetings provided that ABCA has the resources to pay these fees. ABCA will consider applying for officers and directors liability insurance at such time when it has the resources to do so.

27

Summary Executive Compensation Table

The following table shows, for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 and the period January 6, , 2009 (inception) to January 31, 2009, compensation awarded to or paid to, or earned by, our Chief Executive Officer (the “Named Executive Officer”).

The compensation in 2009 was paid through the issuance of 9,000,000 shares of common stock.

There is no employment contract with Mr. Sundberg at this time; nor are there any agreements for compensation in the future. Mr. Sundberg’s compensation has not been fixed or based on any percentage calculations. He will make all decisions determining the amount and timing of his compensation and, for the immediate future, will receive the level of compensation each month that permits us to meet our obligations. Mr. Sundberg’s compensation amounts will be more formalized if and when his annual compensation reaches $150,000.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

There are no outstanding equity awards.

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

As of  July 15, 2010weAugust 24, 2010 we had 9,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding which are held by one shareholder. The chart below sets forth the ownership, or claimed ownership, of certain individuals and entities. This chart discloses those persons known by the board of directors to have, or claim to have, beneficial ownership of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of  July 15,August 24, 2010; of all directors and executive officers of ABCA; and of our directors and officers as a group.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The sole promoter of ABCA is Edward A. Sundberg, our chief executive officer.

Our office and mailing address is 13070 Addison Road, Roswell, GA 30075. The space is provided to us by Mr. Sundberg. Mr. Sundberg incurs no incremental costs as a result of our using the space. Therefore, he does not charge us for its use. There is no written lease agreement.

The Company issued 9,000,000 shares of its common stock to its President in exchange for organizational costs incurred upon incorporation in January 2009.

28

ABCA has entered into an agreement regarding our president lending funds to us if necessary (Exhibit 10.1). No amounts were outstanding under this agreement as of January 31, 2009. A summary of Exhibit 10.1 may be found in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” section of this prospectus. Exhibit 10.1 is filed as part of our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Introduction

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 12, 2009. ABCA is authorized to issue 74,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

Preferred Stock

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with designations, rights and preferences determined from time to time by our board of directors. No shares of preferred stock have been designated, issued or are outstanding. Accordingly, our board of directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with voting, liquidation, conversion, or other rights that could adversely affect the rights of the holders of the common stock. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of preferred stock, there can be no assurance that we will not do so in the future.

Among other rights, our board of directors may determine, without further vote or action by our stockholders:

·

the number of shares and the designation of the series;

·

whether to pay dividends on the series and, if so, the dividend rate, whether dividends will be cumulative and, if so, from which date or dates, and the relative rights of priority of payment of dividends on shares of the series;

·

whether the series will have voting rights in addition to the voting rights provided by law and, if so, the terms of the voting rights;

·

whether the series will be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of any other class or series of stock and, if so, the terms and conditions of conversion or exchange;

·

whether or not the shares of the series will be redeemable and, if so, the dates, terms and conditions of redemption and whether there will be a sinking fund for the redemption of that series and, if so, the terms and amount of the sinking fund; and

·

the rights of the shares of the series in the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up and the relative rights or priority, if any, of payment of shares of the series.

We presently do not have plans to issue any shares of preferred stock. However, preferred stock could be used to dilute a potential hostile acquirer. Accordingly, any future issuance of preferred stock or any rights to purchase preferred shares may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. This may delay, defer or prevent a change of control in our Company or an unsolicited acquisition proposal. The issuance of preferred stock also could decrease the amount of earnings attributable to, and assets available for distribution to, the holders of our common stock and could adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the holders of our common stock.

Common Stock

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 74,000,000 shares of common stock. There are 9,000,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding at  July 15,August 24, 2010 that are held by one shareholder. The holders of our common stock:

·

have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available for payment of dividends when, as and if declared by the board of directors;

·

are entitled to share ratably in all of the assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs;

·

do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights, or redemption or access to any sinking fund; and

·

are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters submitted to stockholders for a vote at any meeting of stockholders

See also Plan of Distribution regarding negative implications of being classified as a “Penny Stock.”

29

Authorized but Un-issued Capital Stock

Nevada law does not require stockholder approval for any issuance of authorized shares. These additional shares may be used for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital or to facilitate corporate acquisitions.

One of the effects of the existence of un-issued and unreserved common stock may be to enable our board of directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management, which issuance could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of our board by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and thereby protect the continuity of our management and possibly deprive the stockholders of opportunities to sell their shares of our common stock at prices higher than prevailing market prices.

Shareholder Matters

As an issuer of "penny stock" the protection provided by the federal securities laws relating to forward looking statements does not apply to us if our shares are considered to be penny stocks which they currently are and probably will be for the foreseeable future. Although the federal securities law provide a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by a public company that files reports under the federal securities laws, this safe harbor is not available to issuers of penny stocks. As a result, we will not have the benefit of this safe harbor protection in the event of any claim that the material provided by us, including this prospectus, contained a material misstatement of fact or was misleading in any material respect because of our failure to include any statements necessary to make the statements not misleading.

As a Nevada corporation, we are subject to theNevada Revised Statutes ("NRS" or "Nevada law"). Certain provisions ofNevada law create rights that might be deemed material to our shareholders. Other provisions might delay or make more difficult acquisitions of our stock or changes in our control or might also have the effect of preventing changes in our management or might make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that some of our shareholders may believe to be in their best interests.

Directors' Duties. Section 78.138 of the Nevada law allows our directors and officers, in exercising their powers to further our interests, to consider the interests of our employees, suppliers, creditors and customers. They can also consider the economy of the state and the nation, the interests of the community and of society and our long-term and short-term interests and shareholders, including the possibility that these interests may be best served by our continued independence. Our directors may resist a change or potential change in control if they, by a majority vote of a quorum, determine that the change or potential change is opposed to or not in our best interest. Our board of directors may consider these interests or have reasonable grounds to believe that, within a reasonable time, any debt which might be created as a result of the change in control would cause our assets to be less than our liabilities, render us insolvent, or cause us to file for bankr uptcy protection

Amendments to Bylaws -Our articles of incorporation provide that the power to adopt, alter, amend, or repeal our bylaws is vested exclusively with the board of directors. In exercising this discretion, our board of directors could conceivably alter our bylaws in ways that would affect the rights of our shareholders and the ability of any shareholder or group to effect a change in our control; however, the board would not have the right to do so in a way that would violate law or the applicable terms of our articles of incorporation.

Transfer Agent

The Transfer Agent for our common stock is Action Stock Transfer Corp., 7069 S. Highland Drive, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, UT 84121. Its telephone number is 801-274-1088.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

There is no public market for our common stock. Our common stock is currently held by one shareholder. Therefore, the current and potential market for our common stock is limited and the liquidity of our shares may be severely limited. A market maker has filed an application with FINRA so as to be able to quote the shares of our common stock on the OTCBB maintained by FINRA commencing upon the effectiveness of our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and the subsequent closing of this offering. There can be no assurance as to whether such market maker’s application will be accepted by FINRA nor can we estimate the time period that will be required for the application process. In the absence of quotation or listing, no market is available for investors in our common stock to sell their shares. We cannot provide any assurance that a meaningful trading market will ever develop or that our common stock will ever be quoted or listed forf or trading.

If the shares of our common stock ever become tradable, the trading price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various events or factors, many of which are beyond our control. As a result, investors may be unable to sell their shares at or greater than the price at which they are being offered.

30

This offering will be conducted on a best-efforts basis utilizing the efforts of Edward A. Sundberg, president of the Company. Potential investors include, but are not limited to, family, friends and acquaintances of Edward A. Sundberg. The intended methods of communication include, without limitation, telephone calls and personal contact. In his endeavors to sell this offering, Mr. Sundberg will not use any mass advertising methods such as the internet or print media.

Funds received by the sales agent in connection with sales of our securities will be transmitted immediately into an escrow account until the minimum sales threshold is reached. There can be no assurance that all, or any, of the shares will be sold.

Edward A. Sundberg will not receive commissions for any sales originated on our behalf. We believe that Mr. Sundberg is exempt from registration as a broker under the provisions of Rule 3a4-1 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In particular, Mr. Sundberg:

1

Is not subject to a statutory disqualification, as that term is defined in Section 3(a)39 of the Act, at the time of his participation;

a.

Is not to be compensated in connection with his participation by the payment of commissions or other remuneration based either directly or indirectly on transactions in securities;

b.

Is not an associated person of a broker or dealer; and

c.

Meets the conditions of the following:

i.

Primarily performs, or is intended primarily to perform at the end of the offering, substantial duties for or on behalf of the issuer otherwise than in connection with transactions in securities;

ii.

Was not a broker or dealer, or associated persons of a broker or dealer, within the preceding 12 months; and

iii.

Did not participate in selling an offering of securities for any issuer more than once every 12 months other than in reliance on paragraphs within this section, except that for securities issued pursuant to rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, the 12 months shall begin with the last sale of any security included within one rule 415 registration.

No officers or directors of the Company may purchase any securities in this offering.

There can be no assurance that all, or any, of the shares will be sold. As of this date, we have not entered into any agreements or arrangements for the sale of the shares with any broker/dealer or sales agent. However, if we were to enter into such arrangements, we will file a post effective amendment to disclose those arrangements because any broker/dealer participating in the offering would be acting as an underwriter and would have to be so named herein. In order to comply with the applicable securities laws of certain states, the securities may not be offered or sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in such states or an exemption from such registration or qualification requirement is available and with which we have complied. The purchasers in this offering and in any subsequent trading market must be residents of such states where the shares have been registered or qualified for sale or an exemption from such registration or qu alification requirement is available. As of this date, we have not identified the specific states where the offering will be sold.

The proceeds from the sale of the shares in this offering will be payable to Gary B. Wolff, P.C. – Escrow Account. ("Escrow Account") and will be deposited in a noninterest-bearing bank account until the minimum offering proceeds are raised. Failure to do so will result in checks being returned to the investor who submitted the check. No interest will be paid to any shareholder or the Company. All subscription agreements and checks are irrevocable. All subscription funds will be held in the Escrow Account pending achievement of the Minimum Offering, and no funds shall be released to ABCA until such a time as the minimum proceeds are raised. The escrow agent will continue to receive funds and perform additional disbursements until either the Maximum Offering is achieved or a period of 180 days from the effective date of this offering expires (or an additional 180 days if so extended by the Company), whichever event first occurs. Thereafter, this escrow agreement shall terminate. If the Minimum Offering is not achieved within 180 days of the date of this prospectus (or an additional 180 days if so extended by the Company), all subscription funds will be returned to investors promptly without interest or deduction of fees.

Investors can purchase common stock in this offering by completing a Subscription Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, and sending it together with payment in full. All payments must be made in United States currency either by personal check, bank draft, or cashier check. There is no minimum subscription requirement. All subscription agreements and checks are irrevocable. The Company expressly reserves the right to either accept or reject any subscription. Any subscription rejected will be returned to the subscriber within five business days of the rejection date. Furthermore, once a subscription agreement is accepted, it will be executed without reconfirmation to or from the subscriber. Once we accept a subscription, the subscriber cannot withdraw it.

Any purchasers of our securities should be aware that any market that develops in our common stock will be subject to “penny stock” restrictions.

31

We will pay all expenses incident to the registration, offering and sale of the shares other than commissions or discounts of underwriters, broker-dealers or agents.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Any purchasers of our securities should be aware that any market that develops in our stock will be subject to the penny stock restrictions.

The trading of our securities, if any, will be in the over-the-counter markets which are commonly referred to as the OTCBB as maintained by FINRA (once and if and when quoting thereon has occurred). As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the price of, our securities.

OTCBB Considerations

OTCBB securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTCBB securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers in stocks. OTCBB stocks are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a regional or national stock exchange.

To be quoted on the OTCBB, a market maker must file an application on our behalf in order to make a market for our common stock. We are not permitted to file such application on our own behalf. A market maker has filed an application with FINRA on our behalf so as to be able to quote the shares of our common stock on the OTCBB maintained by FINRA commencing upon the effectiveness of our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. There can be no assurance that the market maker’s application will be accepted by FINRA, nor can we estimate as to the time period that the application will require.

The OTCBB is separate and distinct from the NASDAQ stock market. NASDAQ has no business relationship with issuers of securities quoted on the OTCBB. The SEC’s order handling rules, which apply to NASDAQ-listed securities, do not apply to securities quoted on the OTCBB.

Although the NASDAQ stock market has rigorous listing standards to ensure the high quality of its issuers, and can delist issuers for not meeting those standards, the OTCBB has no listing standards. Rather, it is the market maker who chooses to quote a security on the system, files the application, and is obligated to comply with keeping information about the issuer in its files. FINRA cannot deny an application by a market maker to quote the stock of a company assuming all FINRA questions relating to its Rule 211 process are answered accurately and satisfactorily. The only requirement for ongoing inclusion in the OTCBB is that the issuer be current in its reporting requirements with the SEC.

Although we anticipate that quotation on the OTCBB will increase liquidity for our stock, investors may have difficulty in getting orders filled because trading activity on the OTCBB in general is not conducted as efficiently and effectively as with NASDAQ-listed securities. As a result, investors’ orders may be filled at a price much different than expected when an order is placed.

Investors must contact a broker-dealer to trade OTCBB securities. Investors do not have direct access to the bulletin board service. For bulletin board securities, there only has to be one market maker.

OTCBB transactions are conducted almost entirely manually. Because there are no automated systems for negotiating trades on the OTCBB, they are conducted via telephone. In times of heavy market volume, the limitations of this process may result in a significant increase in the time it takes to execute investor orders. Therefore, when investors place market orders - an order to buy or sell a specific number of shares at the current market price - it is possible for the price of a stock to go up or down significantly during the lapse of time between placing a market order and getting execution.

If we become able to have our shares of common stock quoted on the OTCBB, we will then try, through a broker-dealer and its clearing firm, to become eligible with the DTC to permit our shares to trade electronically. If an issuer is not “DTC-eligible”, then its shares cannot be electronically transferred between brokerage accounts, which, based on the realities of the marketplace as it exists today (especially the OTCBB), means that shares of a company will not be traded (technically the shares can be traded manually between accounts, but this takes days and is not a realistic option for companies relying on broker dealers for stock transactions - like all the companies on the OTCBB). What this boils down to is that while DTC-eligibility is not a requirement to trade on the OTCBB, it is a necessity to process trades on the OTCBB if a company’s stock is going to trade with any volume. There are no assurances that our shares will ever become DTC-eligible or, if they do, how long it will take.

32

Because OTCBB stocks are usually not followed by analysts, there may be lower trading volume than for NASDAQ-listed securities.

Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act

Our shares will be covered by Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 15g-1 through 15g-6 promulgated thereunder. They impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouses).

Rule 15g-1 exempts a number of specific transactions from the scope of the penny stock rules (but is not applicable to us).

Rule 15g-2 declares unlawful broker-dealer transactions in penny stocks unless the broker-dealer has first provided to the customer a standardized disclosure document.

Rule 15g-3 provides that it is unlawful for a broker-dealer to engage in a penny stock transaction unless the broker-dealer first discloses and subsequently confirms to the customer current quotation prices or similar market information concerning the penny stock in question.

Rule 15g-4 prohibits broker-dealers from completing penny stock transactions for a customer unless the broker-dealer first discloses to the customer the amount of compensation or other remuneration received as a result of the penny stock transaction.

Rule 15g-5 requires that a broker-dealer executing a penny stock transaction, other than one exempt under Rule 15g-1, disclose to its customer, at the time of or prior to the transaction, information about the sales persons compensation.

Rule 15g-6 requires broker-dealers selling penny stocks to provide their customers with monthly account statements.

Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum bid price of less than $4.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $4.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions. It is likely that our shares will be considered to be penny stocks for the immediately foreseeable future. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:

·

the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination, and

·

that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stock in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Additionally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. The above-referenced requirements may create a lack of liquidity, making trading difficult or impossible, and accordingly, shareholders may find it difficult to dispose of our shares.

33

State Securities – Blue Sky Laws

There is no established public market for our common stock, and there can be no assurance that any market will develop in the foreseeable future. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities or securities regulations laws promulgated by various states and foreign jurisdictions, commonly referred to as "Blue Sky" laws. Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our common stock may not be traded in such jurisdictions. Because the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the blue sky laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that there may be significant state blue-sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. Accordingly, investors may not be able to liquidate their investments and should be prepared to hold the common stock for an indefinite period of time.

We will consider applying for listing in Mergent, Inc., a leading provider of business and financial information on publicly listed companies, which, once published, will provide ABCA with “manual” exemptions in approximately 33 states as indicated in CCH Blue Sky Law Desk Reference at Section 6301 entitled “Standard Manuals Exemptions.” However, we may not be accepted for listing in Mergent or similar services designed to obtain manual exemptions if we are considered to be a "shell" at the time of application.

Thirty-three states have what is commonly referred to as a "manual exemption" for secondary trading of securities such as those to be resold by selling stockholders under this registration statement. In these states, so long as we obtain and maintain a listing in Mergent, Inc. or Standard and Poor's Corporate Manual, secondary trading of our common stock can occur without any filing, review or approval by state regulatory authorities in these states. These states are: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. We cannot secure this listing, and thus this qualification, until after our registration statement is declared effective. Once we se cure this listing, secondary trading can occur in these states without further action.

Upon effectiveness of this Prospectus, the Company intends to consider becoming a “reporting issuer” under Section 12(g) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by way of filing a Form 8-A with the SEC. A Form 8-A is a “short form” of registration whereby information about the Company will be incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, of which this prospectus is a part. Upon filing of the Form 8-A, if done, the Company’s shares of common stock will become “covered securities,” or “federally covered securities” as described in some states’ laws, which means that unless you are an “underwriter” or “dealer,” you will have a “secondary trading” exemption under the laws of most states (and the District of Columbia, Guam, the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico) to resell the shares of common stock you purchase in this offering. However, four statesst ates do impose filing requirements on the Company: Michigan, New Hampshire, Texas and Vermont. The Company intends, at its own cost, to make the required notice filings in Michigan, New Hampshire, Texas and Vermont immediately after filings its Form 8-A with the SEC.

We currently do not intend to and may not be able to qualify securities for resale in other states which require shares to be qualified before they can be resold by our shareholders.

Limitations Imposed by Regulation M

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to our common stock for a period of two business days prior to the commencement of such distribution.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the issuance of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Gary B. Wolff, P.C., 488 Madison Avenue, Suite 1100, New York, New York 10022.

EXPERTS

The financial statements of ABCA as of January 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 and for the period from January 12, 2009 (inception) to January 31, 2009, included in this prospectus have been audited by independent registered public accountants and have been so included in reliance upon the report of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC  given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

34

(a) Dismissal of Moore & Associates, Chartered

On August 27, 2009, the Board of Directors of ABCA dismissed Moore & Associates Chartered (“Moore & Associates”), its independent registered public accounting firm.

On August 27, 2009, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") revoked the registration of Moore & Associates because of violations of PCAOB rules and auditing standards in auditing financial statements, PCAOB rules and quality control standards, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and noncooperation with a Board investigation. There had been no disagreements with Moore & Associates prior to or at the time of its dismissal.

(b) Dismissal of Seale and Beers, CPAs

On September 25, 2009 (the "Dismissal Date"), the Board of Directors of ABCA dismissed Seale and Beers, CPAs (“Seale”), its independent registered public accounting firm which it had previously engaged on August 27, 2009, but which firm has not provided any services to date.

During ABCA's most recent fiscal year and the subsequent interim periods through to the Dismissal Date, there were no disagreements as defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K) with Seale on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Seale, would have caused it to make reference in connection with any opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement. Further, during ABCA's most recent fiscal year and the subsequent interim periods through to the Dismissal Date, there were no reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

(c) Dismissal of Li & Company, PC

On June 22, 2010 (the "Dismissal Date"), the Board of Directors of ABCA dismissed Li & Company, PC (“Li”), its independent registered public accounting firm which it had previously engaged on September 25, 2009, but which firm has not provided any services to date.

During the ABCA's most recent fiscal year and the subsequent interim periods through to the Dismissal Date, there were no disagreements as defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K) with Li on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Li, would have caused it to make reference in connection with any opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement. Further, during ABCA's most recent fiscal year and the subsequent interim periods through to the Dismissal Date, there were no reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

(d) Engagement of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

On June 22, 2010 (the "Engagement Date"), ABCA's Board of Directors approved the appointment of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC (“Silberstein”), an independent registered public accounting firm which is registered with, and governed by the rules of, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, as the Registrant's independent registered public accounting firm. During ABCA's two most recent fiscal years, the subsequent interim periods thereto, and through the Engagement Date, neither the ABCA nor anyone on its behalf consulted Silberstein regarding either (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction regarding the Company, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements; or (2) any matter regarding the Company that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and related instructions to Item 304 of RegulationR egulation S-K) or a reportable event (as defined in It emItem 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

UNAUDITED INTERIM STATEMENTS

The information for the interim period ended April 30, 2010 is unaudited; however, it includes all adjustments considered necessary by management for a fair presentation of our financial condition and results of operations.

35

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S1, including exhibits, schedules and amendments, under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock to be sold in this offering. This prospectus does not contain all the information included in the registration statement. For further information about us and the shares of our common stock to be sold in this offering, please refer to our registration statement.

As of the effective date of this prospectus, ABCA became subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, we will file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N. E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You should call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. Our SEC filings will also be available to the public at the SEC's web site at "http:/www.sec.gov."

You may request, and we will voluntarily provide, a copy of our filings, including our annual report which will contain audited financial statements, at no cost to you, by writing or telephoning us at the following address:

American Business Change Agents, Inc.

13070 Addison Road

Roswell, GA 30075

404-915-0570

36

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

January 31, 2010

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

American Business Change Agents, Inc.

Roswell, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets ofAmerican Business Change Agents, Inc. as of January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholder’s deficit, and cash flows for the periods then ended and the period from January 12, 2009 (date of inception) to January 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimatesestima tes made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of American Business Change Agents, Inc., as of January 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods then ended and the period from January 12, 2009 (date of inception) to January 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that American Business Change Agents, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations, has negative working capital, and is in need of additional capital to grow its operations so that it can become profitable. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans with regard to these matters are described in Note 8. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Bingham Farms, Michigan

July 7, 2010

F-2

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF JANUARY 31, 2010 AND 2009

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-3

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE PERIODS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2010 AND 2009

PERIOD FROM JANUARY 12, 2009 (INCEPTION) TO JANUARY 31, 2010

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-4

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT

PERIOD FROM JANUARY 12, 2009 (INCEPTION) TO JANUARY 31, 2010

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-5

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE PERIODS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2010 AND 2009

PERIOD FROM JANUARY 12, 2009 (INCEPTION) TO JANUARY 31, 2010

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-6

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JANUARY 31, 2010

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION

American Business Change Agents, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 12, 2009.

The Company provides strategic business planning and management consulting services to small companies.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Basis

These financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company has elected a fiscal year ending on January 31.

·

Development Stage Company

·

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles related to development-stage companies. A development-stage company is one in which planned principal operations have not commenced or, if its operations have commenced, there have been no significant revenues therefrom.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain accounts and financial statement captions in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the presentation in the current period financial statements.

Advertising

Advertising will be expensed in the period in which it is incurred. There were no advertising expenses in either reporting period.

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Net Loss Per Common Share

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic and diluted net income per common share has been calculated by dividing the net income for the period by the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding assuming that the Company incorporated as of the beginning of the first period presented. There were no dilutive shares or securities outstanding as of January 31, 2010.

F-7

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JANUARY 31, 2010

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilitieslia bilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-8934 on June 26, 2008. Commencing with the Company’s Annual Report for the year ending January 31, 2011 (unless the requirement is waived for a further period of time or eliminated for smaller reporting companies), the Company will be required to include a report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company; of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of year end; and of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.rep orting. The Company’s independent accounting firm may also be required to issue an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which report may also be required to be filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In June 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04,Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99, which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98,Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities ... The Company does notexpect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05,Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:

1. A valuation technique that uses:

a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset

F-8

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JANUARY 31, 2010

b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets.

2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability.

The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08,Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99,which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53,Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42,The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock ... The Company does notexpect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09,Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees ... This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4,Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee ... Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent), which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent).

The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investorinves tor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a futu refuture date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

F-9

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JANUARY 31, 2010

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification. The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification. The correction moves guidance that was previously includedi ncluded in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary. That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders. It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:

The amendments in this Update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses

If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3– ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of $4,500 due to the company’s independent auditors and accrued interest in the amount of $217 (See note 5) as of January 31, 2010.

NOTE 4– LOAN PAYABLE

The Company has a loan payable of $7,220 due to an unrelated party. The loan bears interest at 4% per annum and is payable on demand.

NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT

The Company is authorized to issue 74,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

F-10

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JANUARY 31, 2010

During the period ended January 31, 2009 the Company issued 9,000,000 shares of its common stock to its president for services provided and expenses incurred during the period.

There were no additional shares issued during the year ended January 31, 2010.

There were 9,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2010.

NOTE 6– INCOME TAXES

As of January 31, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $20,937 that may be available to reduce future years’ taxable income through 2029. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have not been recognized in these financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carry-forwards.

The provision for Federal income tax consists of the following:

The cumulative tax effect at the expected statutory rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:

Because of the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards of $20,937 for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur in the future, net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to their use in future years.

NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. An officer has provided office services without charge. There is no obligation for the officer to continue this arrangement. Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and, accordingly, are not reflected herein.

The officers and directors are involved in other business activities and most likely will become involved in other business activities in the future.

F-11

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JANUARY 31, 2010

NOTE 8 – GOING CONCERN

The Company was formed in January 2009. It has negative working capital of $11,937 and a net stockholders’ deficit of $11,937 at January 31, 2010. It generated total revenue of $8,100 during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, all but $200 of which came from one unrelated client, and has no sources of financing. While the Company is attempting to expand operations and produce revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by seeking funds from private investors known to its President after consistent revenue generation has commenced. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. There are no assurances that the Company will complete the engagements successfully or that these engagements will be extended. While the Company believes in the v iabilityviability of its strategy to increase revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that its business plan will succeed.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date on which the financial statements were submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission and has determined it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose.

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND JANUARY 31, 2010

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 AND 2009 AND THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 12, 2009 (INCEPTION) TO APRIL 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 AND 2009 AND THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 12, 2009 (INCEPTION) TO APRIL 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-15

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

APRIL 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION

American Business Change Agents, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 12, 2009.

The Company provides strategic business planning and management consulting services to small companies.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Basis

These financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company has elected a fiscal year ending on January 31.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations realized during an interim period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010.

Development Stage Company

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles related to development-stage companies. A development-stage company is one in which planned principal operations have not commenced or, if its operations have commenced, there have been no significant revenues therefrom.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain accounts and financial statement captions in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the presentation in the current period financial statements.

Advertising

Advertising will be expensed in the period in which it is incurred. There were no advertising expenses in either reporting period.

F-16

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

APRIL 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Net Loss Per Common Share

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic and diluted net income per common share has been calculated by dividing the net income for the period by the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding assuming that the Company incorporated as of the beginning of the first period presented. There were no dilutive shares or securities outstanding as of April 30, 2010.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilitieslia bilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-8934 on June 26, 2008. Commencing with the Company’s Annual Report for the year ending January 31, 2011 (unless the requirement is waived for a further period of time or eliminated for smaller reporting companies), the Company will be required to include a report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company; of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of year end; and of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.rep orting. The Company’s independent accounting firm may also be required to issue an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which report may also be required to be filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In June 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended tosimplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

F-17

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

APRIL 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04,Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99, which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98,Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities ... The Company does notexpect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05,Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:

1. A valuation technique that uses:

a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset

b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets.

2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability.

The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. Theamendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quotedprice of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08,Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99,which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53,Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42,The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock ... The Company does notexpect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09,Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees ... This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4,Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee ... Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent), which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent).

F-18

AMERICAN BUSINESS CHANGE AGENTS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

APRIL 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investmentabout the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by theinvestor to i nvestinvest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification. The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification. The correction moves guidance that was previously includedi ncluded in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary. That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders. It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following: