As filed with the Securities And Exchange Commission on May 5,June 17, 2005

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

____________________

Amendment No. 12
to

_____________________

WIDEPOINT CORPORATION

One Lincoln Centre
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
(630) 629-0003
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Steve L. Komar
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
WidePoint Corporation
One Lincoln Centre
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
(630) 629-0003
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, And Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent For Service)

Copies to:

Arthur H. Bill, Esq.
Thomas L. James, Esq.
Foley & Lardner LLP
3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, DC 20007

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.[x]þ

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  [  ]offering.o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.[  ]o

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.[   ]

______________________

1o

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling stockholders named in this prospectus may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and neither we nor the selling stockholders named in this prospectus are soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to completion, dated May 5,June 17, 2005

PROSPECTUS

WIDEPOINT CORPORATION
31,197,139 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

This prospectus relates to resale by the selling stockholders of up to 31,197,139 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value per share, consisting of (i) 5,000,000 outstanding shares of our common stock; (ii) 17,457,140 shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and (iii) 8,739,999 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of these shares.

Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “WDPT.” The last reported sale price for our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on April 29,June 15, 2005 was $0.745$0.77 per share. You are urged to obtain current market quotations for our common stock. The selling stockholders may offer their shares of common stock from time to time, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, or a combination of methods, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may engage brokers or dealers who may receive commissions or discounts from the selling stockholders. Any broker-dealer acquiring the common stock from the selling stockholders may sell these securities in normal market making activities, through other brokers on a principal or agency basis, in negotiated transactions, to its customers or through a combination of methods. See “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 54.68. We will bear all of the expenses and fees incurred in registering the shares offered by this prospectus.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 45 for a discussion of the risks associated with our business.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is MayJune __, 2005.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

     1

RISK FACTORS

  4

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

15

USE OF PROCEEDS

16

DILUTION

16

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

17

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

18

PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

26

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

29

BUSINESS

30

MANAGEMENT

43

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT  

48

MARKET PRICE OF COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND POLICY

51

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

52

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

54

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK  

56

LEGAL MATTERS

59

EXPERTS

60

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

61

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WIDEPOINT CORPORATION

F-2

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONAL

RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC.

F -24

i

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including “Risk Factors” beginning on page 4,5, before deciding to invest in our common stock. Unless the context otherwise requires references in this prospectus to “WidePoint,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to WidePoint Corporation.

WidePoint Corporation

We are an information technology (“IT”) services firm with established competencies in federal government and private commercial sector IT consulting services, including planning, managing and implementing IT solutions, software and secure authentication processes, and specialized outsourcing arrangements. Our staff consists of business and computer specialists who help our government and civilian customers augment and expand their resident technologic skills and competencies, drive technical innovation, and help develop and maintain a competitive edge in today'stoday’s rapidly changing technological environment in business.

On October 25, 2004, we completed the acquisition of Operational Research Consultants, Inc., or ORC. ORC specializes in IT integration and secure authentication processes and software, and providing services to the United States Government. ORC has been at the forefront of implementing Public Key Infrastructure (“PKI”) technologies. PKI technology is rapidly becoming the technology of choice to enable security services within and between different computer systems utilized by various agencies and departments of the U.S. Government. Based on asymmetric key cryptography, PKI technology uses a class of algorithms in which a user can receive two electronic keys, consisting of a public key and a private key, to encrypt any information and/or communication being transmitted to or from the user within a computer network and between different computer networks. The user provides his or her public key to any and all desired persons or entities. The user does not share the private key with anyone else. The public key will encrypt all information and/or communication from any sender and the private key will allow only the holder of the private key to unlock and decrypt such information and/or communication. Thus, the algorithms used in PKI technologies help to achieve authentication of users and information, integrity of all data and communications, non-repudiation or rejection of data and communications, and support confidentiality of data and communications. PKI also speeds up and simplifies the delivery of products and services by providing electronic approaches to processes that historically have been paper based. These electronic solutions depend on PKI for identification and authentication; data integrity; confidentiality of information and transactions; and non-repudiation to facilitate mission-related and transactions internal to an organization and with exter nalexternal organizations. ORC is currently the only entity that has been designated by the United States Government as an External Certificate Authority for the U.S. Government. As such, ORC is authorized to issue all permissible certificate types and services in accordance with Defense Information Systems Agency and National Security Agency standards, necessary for the interoperable, secure exchange of information between U.S. Governmental agencies, contractors, and international allies such as members of NATO.

We are actively seeking the acquisition of other companies with complementary technical capabilities and are focused on providing IT, software and related services to the federal government (both defense agencies and civilian agencies), state governments, local agencies, and corporate clients. If successful, we anticipate that we will become a significantly larger company with broader capabilities and resources than has been the case historically.

Corporate Information

Our executive offices are located at One Lincoln Centre, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181, and our telephone number is 630-629-0003. We maintain a website with the address www.widepoint.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this prospectus.

1

2

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes the financial data for our business obtained from our audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004.2004 and from our unaudited financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2005. You should read this information with the discussion in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

23

SELECTED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table summarizes the pro forma financial information reflecting our acquisition of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. on October 25, 2004. The proforma information reflects the acquisition of ORC by WidePoint as if the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2004 for the Statement of Operations of ORC for the year ended December 31, 2004. You should read this information with the financial statements of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. and pro forma financial information set forth elsewhere in this prospectus.

4

We may have difficulty responding to changing technology.

The IT industry is characterized by rapidly advancing technology. Our future success will depend, in large part, upon our ability to anticipate and keep pace with advancing technology and competitive innovations.

However, we may not be successful in identifying, developing and marketing new products or services or enhancing our existing products or services. In addition, we can give no assurance that new products or services may be developed that will render our current or planned products or services obsolete or inferior. Rapid technological development by competitors may result in our products or services becoming obsolete before we recover a significant portion of the research and development expenses incurred with respect to such products or services.

We may be unable to implement our acquisition program.

Demand for businesses with credible business relationships and capabilities to provide services to various government agencies at the federal, state and local levels is very competitive. To the extent that this competition causes the price for these businesses to elevate beyond reasonable levels where funding for such acquisitions is no longer available, WidePoint may not be able to implement our acquisition strategy. Any significant change in the spending pattern of the federal government could potentially have an adverse effect on acquisition targets and as such, argue against making such acquisitions.

We may have difficulty integrating acquisitions into our existing operations.

To the extent that some acquisitions may have operational complexities due to the nature of their business, the election to not fully integrate such acquisitions may be made if such integration does not quantitatively improve operational or financial efficiencies. Some integration efforts will be phased in to ensure that desired efficiencies are quickly and cost effectively realized. Any element of integration must be justified rationally on potential cost savings realized by the business. If we are unable to successfully integrate some or all of the operations of ORC or future acquisitions this could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

We may not receive the full amount of our backlog, which could harm our business.

Our total backlog includes both funded and unfunded orders for services under existing signed contracts, assuming the exercise of all options relating to those contracts that we reasonably believe will be exercised. Congress often appropriates funds for our clients on a yearly basis, even though their contracts with us may call for performance that is expected to take a number of years. As a result, contracts typically are only partially funded at any point during their term, and all or some of the work to be performed under the contracts may remain unfunded unless and until Congress makes subsequent appropriations and the procuring agency allocates funding to the contract.

The dollar amount of our backlog orders believed to be firm as of March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 were $8 million and $3 million, respectively. The portion of backlog reasonably expected to be filled during 2005 is $8 million.

There can be no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenues in any particular period, or at all, or that any contract included in backlog will be profitable. This is because the actual receipt and timing of any of these revenues is subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, we may never realize revenues from some of the engagements that are included in our backlog, and there is a higher degree of risk in this regard with respect to unfunded backlog. The federal government'sgovernment’s ability to select multiple winners under multiple award schedule contracts, government-wide acquisition contracts, blanket purchase agreements and other indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts, as well as its right to award subsequent task orders among such multiple winners, means that there is no assurance that unfunded contract backlog will result in actual orders. The actual rece iptreceipt of revenues on engagements included in backlog may never occur or may change because a program schedule could change or the program could be canceled, or a contract could be reduced, modified, or terminated early. Moreover, under multiple award schedule contracts, government wide acquisition contracts, blanket purchase agreements, and other indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts, the government is frequently not obligated to order more than a minimum quantity of goods or services.

6

unanticipated delay in the scheduling for, our projects may cause significant variations in operating results in any particular quarter and could have a material adverse effect on operations for that quarter.

An unanticipated termination or decrease in size or scope of a major project, a client'sclient’s decision not to proceed with a project we anticipated or the completion during a quarter of several major client projects could require us to maintain underutilized employees and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our revenues and earnings may also fluctuate from quarter to quarter because of such factors as:

·

the contractual terms and timing of completion of projects, including achievement of certain business results;

·

any delays incurred in connection with projects;

·

the adequacy of provisions for losses and bad debts;

·

the accuracy of our estimates of resources required to complete ongoing projects;

·

loss of key highly skilled personnel necessary to complete projects; and

·

	•		the contractual terms and timing of completion of projects, including achievement of certain business results;
	•		any delays incurred in connection with projects;
	•		the adequacy of provisions for losses and bad debts;
	•		the accuracy of our estimates of resources required to complete ongoing projects;
	•		loss of key highly skilled personnel necessary to complete projects; and
	•		general economic conditions.

We may lose money if we do not accurately estimate the costs of fixed-price engagements.

Some of our projects may be based on fixed-price, fixed-time contracts, rather than contracts in which payment to us is determined on a time and materials basis. Our failure to accurately estimate the resources required for a project, or our failure to complete our contractual obligations in a manner consistent with the project plan upon which our fixed-price, fixed-time contract was based, could adversely affect our overall profitability and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may fix the price for some projects at an early stage of the process, which could result in a fixed price that turns out to be too low and, therefore, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our clients could unexpectedly terminate their contracts for our services.

In both our commercial and federal sector businesses, some of our contracts can be canceled by the client with limited advance notice and without significant penalty. Termination by any client of a contract for our services could result in a loss of expected revenues and additional expenses for staff that were allocated to that client'sclient’s project. We could be required to maintain underutilized employees who were assigned to the terminated contract. The unexpected cancellation or significant reduction in the scope of any of our large projects could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be liable to our clients for damages caused by our services or by our failure to remedy system failures.

Many of our projects involve technology applications or systems that are critical to the operations of our clients'clients’ businesses. If we fail to perform our services correctly, we may be unable to deliver applications or systems to our clients with the promised functionality or within the promised time frame, or to satisfy the required service levels for support and maintenance. While we have taken precautionary actions to create redundancy and back-up systems, any such failures by us could result in claims by our clients for substantial damages against us. Although we attempt to limit the amount and type of our contractual liability for defects in the applications or systems we provide, and carry insurance coverage that mitigates this liability in certain instances, we cannot be assured that these limitations and insurance coverages will be applicable and enforceable in all cases. Even if these limitations

8

and insurance coverages are found to be applicable and enforceable, our liability to our clients for these types of claims could be material in amount and affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we do not attract and retain qualified professional staff, we may not be able to adequately perform our client engagements and could be limited in accepting new client engagements.

Our business is labor intensive, and our success depends upon our ability to attract, retain, train and motivate highly skilled employees. Intense competition exists for employees who have specialized skills or significant experience in business and technology consulting. The improvement in demand for business and technology consulting services that began in the third quarter of 2003 has also increased the need for highly skilled employees. We may not be successful in attracting enough employees to achieve our desired expansion or staffing plans. Furthermore, the industry turnover rates for these types of employees are high, and we may not be successful in retaining, training and motivating the employees we are able to attract. Any inability to attract, retain, train and motivate employees could impair our ability to adequately manage and complete existing projects and to bid for or acce ptaccept new client engagements. Such inability may also force us to hire expensive independent contractors, which could increase our costs and reduce our profitability on client engagements. We must also devote substantial managerial and financial resources to monitoring and managing our workforce and other resources. Our future

success will depend on our ability to manage the levels and related costs of our workforce and other resources effectively.

We may be unable to protect our proprietary methodology.

Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary methodology and other intellectual property rights. We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements, and copyright and trademark laws to protect our proprietary rights. We generally enter into nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements with our employees, partners, consultants, independent sales agents and clients, and limit access to and distribution of our proprietary information. We cannot be certain that the steps we take in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of our proprietary information or that we will be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual property rights. Specifically in the Government sector, statutory contracting regulations protect the rights of Federal Agencies to retain access to, and utilization of, proprietary intellectual property utilized in the delivery of contracted services to such Agencies. Although we believe that our services and products do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, infringement claims may be asserted against us in the future, and, if asserted, these claims may be successful. A successful claim against us could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our directors and officers have significant voting power and may substantially influence the outcome of any stockholder vote.

Our directors and officers, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 6,405,999 shares of our common stock, or approximately 20.1% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, they have the ability to substantially influence, and may effectively control the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of WidePoint, even if such a change in control would benefit other investors.

We have a concentrated ownership structure and our directors and officers in conjunction with Barron, upon conversion by Barron of all of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the exercise by Barron of all of its warrants, would beneficially own approximately 65% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

We are dependent on our key employees.

Our success will depend in large part upon the continued services of a number of key employees, including Steve Komar, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, James McCubbin, our Vice President, Secretary

9

and Chief Financial Officer, and Mark Mirabile, our Vice President and Chief Operations Officer. On July 1, 2002, we entered into employment arrangements with Messrs. Komar, McCubbin and Mirabile. Each of these three employment agreements was for an initial term of two years, with four renewable one-year options.

On October 25, 2004, we acquired Operational Research Consultants, Inc., or ORC, and in connection with that acquisition, we entered into an employment agreement with Daniel Turissini, the Chief Executive Officer and President of ORC. Mr. Turissini’s employment with us will continue until terminated pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.

We generally do not have employment agreements with our other employees. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if our key employees resign from WidePoint or its subsidiaries to join a competitor or to form a competing company, the loss of such personnel and any resulting loss of existing or potential clients to any such competitor could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although we require our employees to sign agreements prohibiting them from joining a competitor, forming a competing company or soliciting our clients or employees for certain periods of time, we cannot be certain that these agreements will be effective in preventing our key employees from engaging in these actions or that courts or other adjudica tiveadjudicative entities will substantially enforce these agreements. Furthermore, for those employees whom we involuntarily terminated in connection with our restructuring actions, we have waived the non- competition clause of

their agreements in exchange for releases of claims. We granted these waivers only in connection with the restructuring actions, and our general practice is not to waive the non-competition obligations of other departing employees.

The loss of one or more significant customers could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

Historically, we have derived, and may in the future derive, a significant percentage of our total revenues from a relatively small number of clients. During 2004, two customers, Abbott Laboratories and The Department of Homeland Security, individually represented 12%, and 11% of revenues, respectively. During 2003, four customers, Abbot Laboratories, Spencer Stuart, Manpower, and Baxter Healthcare, individually represented 18%, 14%, 13%, and 13% of revenue, respectively. Although this concentration was lessened by the acquisition of ORC, in the event we lose any one of those fourfive significant customers, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We may incur substantial costs in connection with contracts awarded through a competitive procurement process, which could negatively impact our operating results.

Many federal government contracts are awarded through a competitive procurement process. We expect that much of the government business we seek in the foreseeable future will be awarded through competitive procedures. Competitive procurements impose substantial costs and present a number of risks, including:

·

	•		the substantial cost and managerial time and effort that we spend to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that may not be awarded to us; and
	•		the expense and delay that we may face if our competitors protest or challenge contract awards made to us pursuant to competitive procedures, and the risk that any such protest or challenge could result in the resubmission of offers, or in termination, reduction, or modification of the awarded contract.

the substantial cost and managerial time and effort that we spend to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that may not be awarded to us; and

·

the expense and delay that we may face if our competitors protest or challenge contract awards made to us pursuant to competitive procedures, and the risk that any such protest or challenge could result in the resubmission of offers, or in termination, reduction, or modification of the awarded contract.

The costs we incur in the competitive procurement process may be substantial and, to the extent we participate in competitive procurements and are unable to win particular contracts, these costs could negatively affect our operating results. In addition, GSA multiple award schedule contracts, government-wide acquisitions contracts, blanket purchase agreements, and other indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts do not guarantee more than a minimal amount of work for us, but instead provide us access to work generally through further competitive procedures. This competitive process may result in increased competition and pricing pressure, requiring that we make sustained post-award efforts to realize revenues under the relevant contract.

10

Unfavorable government audit results could subject us to a variety of penalties and sanctions, and could harm our reputation and relationships with our clients.

The federal government audits and reviews our performance on contracts, pricing practices, cost structure, and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards. Like most large government contractors, our contracts are audited and reviewed on a continual basis by federal agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency. An unfavorable audit of us, or of our subcontractors, could have a substantial adverse effect on our operating results. For example, any costs that were originally reimbursed could subsequently be disallowed. In this case, cash we have already collected may need to be refunded and future operating margins may be reduced.

If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with U.S. government agencies. In addition, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation if allegations of impropriety were made against us, whether or not true.

Security breaches in sensitive government systems could result in the loss of clients and negative publicity.

Many of the services we provide involve managing and protecting information involved in intelligence, national security, and other sensitive or classified government functions. A security breach in one of these systems

could cause serious harm to our business, damage our reputation, and prevent us from being eligible for further work on sensitive or classified systems for federal government clients. We could incur losses from such a security breach that could exceed the policy limits under our errors and omissions and product liability insurance. Damage to our reputation or limitations on our eligibility for additional work resulting from a security breach in one of the systems we develop, install, and maintain could materially reduce our revenues.

Our failure to obtain and maintain necessary security clearances may limit our ability to perform classified work for government clients, which could cause us to lose business.

Some government contracts require us to maintain facility security clearances, and require some of our employees to maintain individual security clearances. If our employees lose or are unable to timely obtain security clearances, or we lose a facility clearance, the government client can terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration. As a result, to the extent we cannot obtain or maintain the required security clearances for a particular contract, or we fail to obtain them on a timely basis, we may not derive the revenues anticipated from the contract, which, if not replaced with revenues from other contracts, could harm our operating results. To the extent we are not able to obtain facility security clearances or engage employees with the required security clearances for a particular contract, we will be unable to perform that contract and we may not be able to compete for o ror win new contracts for similar work.

Changes in the spending policies or budget priorities of the federal government could cause us to lose revenues.

We derive a significant amount of our revenues from contracts funded by federal government agencies. We believe that contracts with federal government agencies, and defense agencies in particular, will be a significant source of our revenues for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, changes in federal government fiscal or spending policies or the U.S. defense budget could directly affect our financial performance. For example, the reduction in the U.S. defense budget during the early 1990s caused some defense-related government contractors to experience decreased sales, reduced operating margins and, in some cases, net losses. Among the factors that could harm our business are:

·

	•		curtailment of the federal government’s use of technology services firms;
	•		a significant decline in spending by the federal government, in general, or by specific agencies such as the Department of Defense;

curtailment of the federal government's use of technology services firms;11

	•		reductions in federal government programs or requirements;
	•		a shift in spending to federal programs and agencies that we do not support or where we currently do not have contracts;
	•		delays in the payment of our invoices by government payment offices;
	•		federal governmental shutdowns, such as the shutdown that occurred during the government’s 1996 fiscal year, and other potential delays in the government appropriations process; and
	•		general economic and political conditions, including any event that results in a change in spending priorities of the federal government.

reductions in federal government programs or requirements;

·

a shift in spending to federal programs and agencies that we do not support or where we currently do not have contracts;

·

delays in the payment of our invoices by government payment offices;

·

federal governmental shutdowns, such as the shutdown that occurred during the government's 1996 fiscal year, and other potential delays in the government appropriations process; and

·

general economic and political conditions, including any event that results in a change in spending priorities of the federal government.

These or other factors could cause federal government agencies and departments to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts, or not to exercise options to renew contracts, any of which could cause us to lose revenues. In addition, any limitations imposed on spending by U.S. government agencies that result from efforts to reduce the federal deficit may limit both the continued funding of our existing contracts and our ability to obtain additional contracts.

Federal government contracts contain provisions giving government clients a variety of rights that are unfavorable to us, including the ability to terminate a contract at any time for convenience.

Federal government contracts contain provisions and are subject to laws and regulations that provide government clients with rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts. These rights and remedies allow government clients, among other things, to:

·

	•		terminate existing contracts, with short notice, for convenience, as well as for default;
	•		reduce orders under or otherwise modify contracts;
	•		for larger contracts subject to the Truth in Negotiations Act, reduce the contract price or cost where it was increased because a contractor or subcontractor during negotiations furnished cost or pricing data that was not complete, accurate, and current;
	•		for GSA multiple award schedule contracts, government-wide acquisition agreements, and blanket purchase agreements, demand a refund, make a forward price adjustment, or terminate a contract for default if a contractor provided inaccurate or incomplete data during the contract negotiation process, or reduce the contract price under certain triggering circumstances, including the revision of pricelists or other documents upon which the contract award was predicated, the granting of more favorable discounts or terms and conditions than those contained in such documents, and the granting of certain special discounts to certain clients;
	•		terminate our facility security clearances and thereby prevent us from receiving classified contracts;
	•		cancel multi-year contracts and related orders if funds for contract performance for any subsequent year become unavailable;
	•		decline to exercise an option to renew a multi-year contract or issue task orders in connection with indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts;
	•		claim rights in solutions, systems, and technology produced by us;
	•		prohibit future procurement awards with a particular agency due to a finding of organizational conflict of interest based upon prior related work performed for the agency that would give a contractor an unfair

terminate existing contracts, with short notice, for convenience, as well as for default;12

			advantage over competing contractors or the existence of conflicting roles that might bias a contractor’s judgment;
	•		subject the award of contracts to protest by competitors, which may require the contracting federal agency or department to suspend our performance pending the outcome of the protest and may also result in a requirement to resubmit offers for the contract or in the termination, reduction, or modification of the awarded contract; and
	•		suspend or debar us from doing business with the federal government.

for larger contracts subject to the Truth in Negotiations Act, reduce the contract price or cost where it was increased because a contractor or subcontractor during negotiations furnished cost or pricing data that was not complete, accurate, and current;

·

for GSA multiple award schedule contracts, government-wide acquisition agreements, and blanket purchase agreements, demand a refund, make a forward price adjustment, or terminate a contract for default if a contractor provided inaccurate or incomplete data during the contract negotiation process, or reduce the contract price under certain triggering circumstances, including the revision of pricelists or other documents upon which the contract award was predicated, the granting of more favorable discounts or terms and conditions than those contained in such documents, and the granting of certain special discounts to certain clients;

·

terminate our facility security clearances and thereby prevent us from receiving classified contracts;

·

cancel multi-year contracts and related orders if funds for contract performance for any subsequent year become unavailable;

·

decline to exercise an option to renew a multi-year contract or issue task orders in connection with indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts;

·

claim rights in solutions, systems, and technology produced by us;

·

prohibit future procurement awards with a particular agency due to a finding of organizational conflict of interest based upon prior related work performed for the agency that would give a contractor an unfair advantage over competing contractors or the existence of conflicting roles that might bias a contractor's judgment;

·

subject the award of contracts to protest by competitors, which may require the contracting federal agency or department to suspend our performance pending the outcome of the protest and may also result in a requirement to resubmit offers for the contract or in the termination, reduction, or modification of the awarded contract; and

·

suspend or debar us from doing business with the federal government.

If a federal government client terminates one of our contracts for convenience, we may recover only our incurred or committed costs, settlement expenses, and profit on work completed prior to the termination. If a federal government client were to unexpectedly terminate, cancel, or decline to exercise an option to renew with respect to one or more of our significant contracts or suspend or debar us from doing business with the federal government, our revenues and operating results would be materially harmed.

Our failure to comply with complex procurement laws and regulations could cause us to lose business and subject us to a variety of penalties.

We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration, and performance of federal government contracts, which affect how we do business with our federal government clients and may impose added costs on our business. Among the most significant laws and regulations are:

·

	•		the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and agency regulations analogous or supplemental to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which comprehensively regulate the formation, administration, and performance of government contracts;
	•		the Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of all cost or pricing data in connection with some contract negotiations;
	•		the Cost Accounting Standards, which impose cost accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under some cost-based government contracts; and
	•		laws, regulations, and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the exportation of specified solutions and technical data.

the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and agency regulations analogous or supplemental to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which comprehensively regulate the formation, administration, and performance of government contracts;

·

the Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of all cost or pricing data in connection with some contract negotiations;

·

the Cost Accounting Standards, which impose cost accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under some cost-based government contracts; and

·

laws, regulations, and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the exportation of specified solutions and technical data.

If a government review or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including the termination of our contracts, the forfeiture of profits, the suspension of payments owed to us, fines, and our suspension or debarment from doing business with federal government agencies. In particular, the civil False Claims Act provides for treble damages and potentially substantial civil penalties where, for example, a contractor presents a false or fraudulent claim to the government for payment or approval, or makes a false statement in order to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the government. Actions under the civil False Claims Act may be brought by the government or by other persons on behalf of the government. These provisions of the civil False Claims Act permit parties, such as our employees, to su esue us on behalf of the government and share a portion of any recovery. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could result in contract termination, price or fee reductions, or suspension or debarment from contracting with the government, each of which could lead to a material reduction in our revenues.

The adoption of new procurement laws or regulations could reduce the amount of services that are outsourced by the federal government and cause us to experience reduced revenues.

New legislation, procurement regulations, or labor organization pressure could cause federal agencies to adopt restrictive procurement practices regarding the use of outside IT providers. The American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal employee union, strongly endorses legislation that may restrict the

13

procedure by which services are outsourced to government contractors. One such proposal, the Truthfulness, Responsibility, and Accountability in Contracting Act, would have effectively reduced the volume of services that is outsourced by the federal government by requiring agencies to give in-house government employees expanded opportunities to compete against contractors for work that could be outsourced. Although the legislation did not pass committee in either house of Congress last term, and it has not been reintroduced in the current term, if such legislation, or similar legi slation,legislation, were to be enacted, it would likely reduce the amount of IT services that could be outsourced by the federal government, which could materially reduce our revenues.

Risks Related To Our Common Stock and The Offering

Our stock price could be volatile, which could cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

The stock market has, from time to time, experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The market prices of the securities of IT companies have been especially volatile. Broad market fluctuations of this type may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The market price of our common stock has experienced, and may continue to be subject to volatility due to a variety of factors, including:

·

	•		public announcements concerning us, our competitors or the IT industry;
	•		fluctuations in operating results;
	•		introductions of new products or services by us or our competitors;
	•		changes in analysts’ earnings estimates; and
	•		announcements of technological innovations.

public announcements concerning us, our competitors or the IT industry;

·

fluctuations in operating results;

·

introductions of new products or services by us or our competitors;

·

changes in analysts’ earnings estimates; and

·

announcements of technological innovations.

In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the object of securities class action litigation. If we were the object of securities class action litigation, we could incur substantial costs and experience a diversion of our management’s attention and resources and such securities class action litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A third party could be prevented from acquiring your shares of stock at a premium to the market price because of our anti-takeover provisions.

Various provisions of our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so might be beneficial to you and our other stockholders.

The future sale of shares of our common stock may negatively affect our stock price.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares issuable upon the conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and options, the market price of our common stock could fall. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.

The fact that our directors and officers own 20.1% of our outstanding common stock may decrease your influence on stockholder decisions.

Our executive officers and directors, in the aggregate, beneficially own 20.1% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, our officers and directors, will have the ability to influence our management and affairs and the

14

outcome of matters submitted to stockholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors, amendments to our bylaws and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

There may not be sufficient liquidity in the market for our securities in order for investors to sell their securities.

There is currently only a limited public market for our common stock, which is traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, and there can be no assurance that a trading market will develop further or be maintained in the future. As of April 29,June 15, 2005, the closing sale price of our common stock on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board was $0.745.$0.77. As of April 29, 2005 there were approximately 176 registered holders of record not including shares held in street name. During the month of March 2005, our common stock traded an average of 7,850 shares per day with a trading range of $0.62 per share to $0.74 per share. During the past year our common stock has traded an average of 32,392 shares of common stock per day and over the past three years our common stock has traded an average of 23,022 shares of common stock per day. In addition, during the past two years our common stock has had a trading r angerange with a low price of $0.08 per share and a high price of $0.86$1.01 per share.

We could issue additional shares of common stock, which might dilute the book value of our common stock.

We have a total of 110,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, of which 30,780,949 shares were issued and outstanding as of May 2,2005. In addition, we have warrants, options and convertible preferred stock outstanding with respect to which 37,919,783 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. Our board of directors has the authority, without action or vote of our stockholders in most cases, to issue all or a part of any authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. Such stock issuances may be made at a price that reflects a discount from the then-current trading price of our common stock. In addition, in order to raise capital for acquisitions or other general corporate purposes that we may need at today’s stock prices, we would likely need to issue securities that are convertible into or exercisable for a significant number of shares of our common stock. These issu ancesissuances would dilute your percentage ownership interest, which would have the effect of reducing your influence on matters on which our stockholders vote, and might dilute the book value of our common stock. You may incur additional dilution of net tangible book value if holders of stock options or warrants, whether currently outstanding or subsequently granted, exercise their options or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.

The sale of a large number of shares of our common stock could depress our stock price.

As of May 2, 2005, we have reserved 28,360,151 shares of common stock for issuance upon exercise of stock options and warrants. We have also reserved 20,457,143 shares of common stock for issuance upon conversion of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. As of May 2, 2005, holders of warrants and options to purchase an aggregate of 12,084,176 shares of our common stock may exercise those securities and transfer the underlying common stock at any time subject, in some cases, to SEC Rule 144. In addition, in connection with our financing with Barron, a selling stockholder, as discussed in further detail in the “Business” section of this prospectus, we have agreed to register (i) all of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that we issued and sold in the financing and (ii) all of the shares of common stock that are issuable upon exe rciseexercise of the warrants issued to Barron and Westcap in connection with the financing. The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was initially convertible into 20,457,143 shares of our common stock and the warrants initially entitled the holders to acquire an additional 10,739,999 shares of our common stock. During April and May 2005, Barron converted a portion of its shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into 3,000,000 shares of common stock, exercised a portion of its warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock and transferred such shares of common stock to other institutional investors. The registration statement of which this prospectus is a part relates to all such shares of common stock. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market, or the perception that these sales could occur. These sales might also make it more difficult for us to issue equity securities in the future at a pric eprice that we think is appropriate, or at all.

15

Financial investors may have interests different than you or WidePoint, and may be able to impact corporate actions requiring stockholder approval because they own a significant amount of our common stock.

Barron presently owns securities that are convertible into or exercisable for approximately 25,685,711 shares of our common stock. If issued, such shares would constitute approximately 45% of the then outstanding shares of our common stock. In future financings, we may also issue securities that are convertible into or exercisable for a significant number of shares of our outstanding common stock. Financial investors may have short-term financial interests different from our long-term goals and the long-term goals of our management and other stockholders. In addition, based on the significant ownership of our outstanding common stock, financial investors may be able to impact corporate actions requiring stockholder approval.

1416

THE WARRANTS ISSUED BY US RELATE TO AN AGGREGATE OF 18,139,52918,220,141 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK. THESE WARRANTS ARE EXERCISABLE AT A VARIOUS PRICES BETWEEN $0.235 AND $0.45 PER SHARE, SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, WITH TERMS THAT EXTEND UNTIL AS LATE AS OCTOBER 28, 2009. EXERCISE OF THE WARRANTS MAY CAUSE DILUTION TO THE INTERESTS OF OTHER STOCKHOLDERS AS A RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMON STOCK THAT WOULD BE ISSUED UPON EXERCISE. IN ADDITION, SALES OF THE SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE OF THE WARRANTS COULD HAVE A DEPRESSIVE EFFECT ON THE PRICE OF OUR STOCK, PARTICULARLY IF THERE IS NOT A COINCIDING INCREASE IN DEMAND BY PURCHASERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK. FURTHER, THE TERMS ON WHICH WE MAY OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FINANCING DURING THE PERIOD ANY OF THE WARRANTS REMAIN OUTSTANDING MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THE EXISTENCE OF THESE WARRANTS AS WEL L.WELL.

SPECIALNOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this prospectus regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. We cannot guarantee that we actually will achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our for ward-lookingforward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important factors in the cautionary statements included in this prospectus, particularly under the heading “Risk Factors,” that we believe could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

17

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following selected consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data for the quarters ended March��31, 2004 and 2005 are derived from our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

19

contracts during any particular quarter, the schedule of the government agencies for awarding contracts, the term of each contract that we have been awarded and general economic conditions may subject our revenues and operating results to significant variation from quarter to quarter. Because a significant portion of our expenses, such as personnel and facilities costs, are fixed in the short term, successful contract performance and variation in the volume of activity as well as in the number of contracts commenced or completed during any quarter may cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter.

     With our recent acquisition of ORC we rely upon a larger portion of our revenues from the Federal Government directly or as a subcontractor. The Federal Government’s fiscal year ends September 30. If a budget for the same period,next fiscal year has not been approved by that date, our clients may have to suspend engagements that we are working on until a budget has been approved. Such suspensions may cause us to realize lower revenues in the combined total materially affects the comparabilityfourth quarter and/or first quarter of the information reflectedyear. Further, a change in presidential administrations and in senior government officials may negatively affect the selected consolidated financial information presentedrate at which the Federal Government purchases the services which we offer.

     As a result of the factors above, period-to-period comparisons of our revenues and thereforeoperating results may not be indicativemeaningful. You should not rely on these comparisons as indicators of future performance as no assurances can be given that quarterly results will not fluctuate, causing a possible material adverse effect on our futureoperating results and financial condition or results of operations.. Further, as we attempt to continue to implement our strategy of strategic growth driven both by internal growth and potential merger and acqui sitionacquisition activity, we believe that future performance may continue to affect the comparability of the information reflected in the selected consolidated financial information presented above.

In addition, most of our current costs consist primarily of the salaries and benefits paid to our technical, marketing and administrative personnel and as a result of our plan to expand our operations through a combination of internal growth initiatives and merger and acquisition opportunities, we expect such costs to increase. Our profitability also depends upon both the volume of services performed and our ability to manage costs. As a significant portion of our costs are labor related, we must effectively manage these costs to achieve and grow our profitability. To date, we have attempted to maximize our operating margins through efficiencies achieved by the use of our proprietary methodologies, and by offsetting increases in consultant salaries with increases in consultant fees received from our clients. The uncertainties relating to the ability to achieve and maintain profitability, obtain additional funding to partially fund our growth strategy and provide the necessary investment to continue to upgrade its management reporting systems to meet the continuing demands of the present regulatory changes affect the comparability of the information reflected in the selected consolidated financial information presented above.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonably based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments and assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. The significant accounting policies that we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and ev aluatingevaluating our reported financial results include the following:

•		Revenue recognition;
•		Allowance for doubtful accounts;
•		Goodwill and Other Intangibles
•		Accounting for income taxes.

·21

Allowance for doubtful accounts;

·

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

·

Accounting for income taxes.

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which contain additional information regarding accounting policies and other disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.

Revenue Recognition

The majority of our revenues are derived from cost-plus, or time-and-materials contracts. Under cost-plus contracts, revenues are recognized as costs are incurred and include an estimate of applicable fees earned. For time-and-material contracts, revenues are computed by multiplying the number of direct labor-hours expended in the performance of the contract by the contract billing rates and adding other billable direct costs. In the event of a termination of a contract, all billed and unbilled amounts associated with those task orders where work has been performed would be billed and collected. The termination provisions of the contract would be accounted for at the time of termination. Any deferred and/or amortization cost would either be billed or expensed depending upon the termination provisions of the contract. Further, we do not have a history of losses nor have we identified any specific r iskrisk of loss at December 31, 2004 or at March 31, 2005 due to termination provisions and thus we have not recorded provisions for such events.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We determine our Allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligations, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables based on these factors and provide allowances for these receivables when collections become doubtful. Provisions are made based on specific review of all significant outstanding balances.

19

Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets acquired. We have adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 142,“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”These standards require the use of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, set forth the accounting for the initial recognition of acquired intangible assets and goodwill and describe the accounting for intangible assets and goodwill subsequent to initial recognition. Under the provisions of these standards, goodwill is not subject to amortization and annual review is required for impairment. The impairment test under SFAS No. 142 is based on a two-step process involving (i) comparing the estimated fair value of the related reporting unit to its net book value and (ii) com paringcomparing the estimated implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value. Impairment losses are recognized whenever the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value. Our annual impairment testing date is December 31.

We recognize an acquired intangible apart from goodwill whenever the intangible arises from contractual or other legal rights, or when it can be separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, either individually or in combination with a related contract, asset or liability. Such intangibles are amortized over their useful lives. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible subject to amortization is not recoverable from expected future cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value.

We review our long-lived assets, including property and equipment, identifiable intangibles, and goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. To determine recoverability of our long-lived assets, we evaluate the probability that future undiscounted net cash flows will be less than the carrying amount of the assets.

As of December 31, 2004 or March 31, 2005, we are not aware of any known trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to occur and materially affect the methodology or

22

the assumptions we have used to value goodwill and other long-lived assets. Goodwill and long-lived assets are a significant item on our balance sheet and represent approximately 60% of our total assets. Any impairment as a result of the estimate utilizing net cash flows to determine the assumed value of long-lived assets could have a significant impact on our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations. Goodwill and other long-lived assets are identified on the face of the Balance Sheet as Goodwill and Intangibles. Amortization of Intangibles are identified on the face of the Statement of Operations within Amortization and Depreciation.

Our senior management has discussed the development and selection of the accounting estimate, and the MD&A disclosure regarding it, with the audit committee of the board of directors.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred income taxes are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts, and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

We have incurred historical net operating losses, or NOLs, for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no federal income tax provision has been recorded to date and there are no taxes payable. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

Based upon the level of historical losses that may limit utilization of NOL carry forwards in future periods, management is unable to predict whether these net deferred tax assets will be utilized prior to expiration. The unused NOL carry forwards expire in years 2010 through 2023. As such, we have recorded a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions. Such differences could have a material effect on the income tax provision and net income in the period in which such determination is made.

20

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment (Statement(Statement 123(R)). This Statement requires that the costs of employee share-based payments be measured at fair value on the awards’ grant date using an option-pricing model and recognized in the financial statements over the requisite service period. This Statement does not change the accounting for stock ownership plans, which are subject to American Institute of Certified Public Accountants SOP 93-6, “Employer’s Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.” Statement 123(R) supersedes Opinion 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employeesand its related interpretations, and eliminates the alternative to use Opinion 25, intrinsic value method of accounting, which we are currently using.

Statement 123(R) allows for two alternative transition methods. The first method is the modified prospective application whereby compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered that are outstanding as of the adoption date will be recognized over the remaining service period. The compensation cost for that portion of awards will be based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures under Statement 123, as originally issued. All new awards and awards that are modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the adoption date will be accounted for under the provisions of Statement 123(R). The second method is the modified retrospective application, which requires that we restate prior period financial statements. The modified retrospective application may be applied either to all prior per iodsperiods or only to prior interim periods in the year of adoption of this statement. We are currently determining which transition method we will adopt and are evaluating the impact Statement 123(R) will have on our financial position, results of operations, EPS and cash flows when the Statement is adopted. Upon making our determination of the transition method we will adopt Statement 123(R). We will adopt this Statement on January 1, 2006 in accordance with the requirements.

23

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 as Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2004

Revenue.Revenue for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 was approximately $2,670,000 as compared to approximately $723,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2004. The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to a full quarter of revenues from our acquisition of ORC in October 2004.

Cost of sales.Cost of sales for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was approximately $1,847,000, or 70% of revenues, an increase of approximately $1,281,000 over cost of sales of approximately $566,000, or 78% of revenues, for the three month period ended March 31, 2004. The percentage decrease in cost of sales was primarily attributable to lower cost of sales associated with the performance of revenues at ORC. The absolute increase in cost of sales was materially attributable to higher revenues and cost of sales as a result of our acquisition of ORC in October 2004.

Gross profit. As a result of the above, gross profit for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was approximately $822,000, or 30% of revenues, an increase of approximately $665,000 over gross profit of approximately $157,000, or 22% of revenues, for the three month period ended March 31, 2004.

Sales and marketing.Sales and marketing expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was approximately $176,000, or 7% of revenues, an increase of approximately $74,000, as compared to approximately $102,000, or 14% of revenues, for the three month period ended March 31, 2004. The increase was materially attributable to the increase in sales and marketing expenses from our acquisition of ORC in October 2004.

General and administrative.General and administrative expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, were approximately $728,000, or 27% of revenues, an increase of approximately $578,000, as compared to approximately $150,000, or 21% of revenues, incurred for the three month period ended March 31, 2004. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005, was primarily attributable to an increase of approximately $578,000 in additional general and administrative expenses associated with our acquisition of ORC in October 2004, other general and administrative costs associated with the integration of ORC with WidePoint, increases in our accounting and legal fees associated with our requisite filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and our mergers and acquisitions efforts currently underway.

Depreciation and amortization.Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was approximately $89,000, or 3% of revenues, an increase of $87,000, as compared to approximately $1,800 of such expenses, or less than 1% of revenues, recorded for the three month period ended March 31, 2004. The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was primarily attributable to greater amounts of depreciable assets as a result of the acquisition of ORC in October 2004 and an increase in amortization expense associated with the purchase accounting related to the purchase of ORC in October 2004.

Interest income.Interest income for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was $770, or less than 1% of revenues, a decrease of $1,092 as compared to $1,862, or less than 1% of revenues, for the three month period ended March 31, 2004. The decrease in interest income for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was primarily attributable to lesser amounts of cash and cash equivalents along with lower short term interest rates that were available to us on investments in overnight sweep accounts.

Interest expense.Interest expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was $52,783, or 2% of revenues, an increase of $52,668 as compared to $115, or less than 1% of revenues, for the three month period ended March 31, 2004. The increase in interest expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 was primarily attributable to our increase in interest expense associated with our recent secured senior lending facility with RBC-Centura which was utilized in association with the purchase of ORC.

Loss on Financial instrument.The loss from financial instrument for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was approximately $1,869,000. The loss on financial instrument relates to the difference between the fair value of the warrants issued to Barron Partners, LP in connection with the preferred stock financing and the market

24

price of the common stock underlying such warrants at March 31, 2005. In the event that the penalty associated with the registration rights agreement we entered into with Barron Partners, LP is cancelled, the liability associated with the warrants would be removed and applied to the value of the warrants within the equity of WidePoint. No such loss was recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

Other.Other income for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was $2,150, or less than 1% of revenues. Other income was primarily attributable to finder’s fees. There were no other income for the three month period ended March 31, 2004.

Net loss.As a result of the above, the net loss for the three month period ended March 31, 2005, was approximately $2,090,000 as compared to the net loss of approximately $95,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2003

Revenues. Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004, were approximately $5.5 million, an increase of $2.2 million, as compared to revenues of approximately $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The 68% increase in revenues in 2004 was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (“ORC”). ORC contributed approximately $2.2 million in revenues subsequent to our acquisition of ORC on October 25, 2004.

Gross profit. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2004, was approximately $1.5 million, or 27% of revenues, an increase of $0.7 million as compared to gross profit of approximately $0.8 million, or 25% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in the amount of gross profit was materially attributable to greater operating margins within the business base of our recent acquisition of ORC, which experienced gross margins in services of approximately 40%.

Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 were approximately $0.6 million, or 11% of revenues, as compared to $0.4 million, or 13% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2003. The $0.2 million increase in sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003, was primarily attributable to an increase in the amount of sales and marketing expenditures as a result of our recent acquisition of ORC.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 were approximately $1.2 million, or 24% of revenues, as compared to $0.7 million, or 21% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2003. The $0.5 million increase in general and administrative expenses in 2004 was primarily attributable to an increase in the amount of general and administrative expenses associated with the acquisitions of both Chesapeake and ORC, and the implementation of our federal sector business initiative.

21

Interest income (expense). Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $5,841, a decrease of $5,710, or 51%, as compared to $11,551 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in interest income in 2004 was primarily attributable to lesser amounts of available cash and other securities. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $38,144, an increase of $36,840, or 2,725%, as compared to $1,304 in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in interest expense in 2004 was primarily attributable to the increase in interest expense associated with our recent secured senior lending facility with RBC-Centura which was utilized in association with the purchase of ORC.

Loss from Financial Instruments.We recognized a loss from financial instruments of approximately $205,000 in the year ended December 31, 2004 which related to the difference between the fair value of the warrants issued to Barron Partners, LP in connection with the preferred stock financing and the market price of the common stock underlying such warrants at December 31, 2004. No such loss was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2003.

Net loss. As a result of the above, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 was approximately $0.6 million, an increase of $0.3 million, as compared to the net loss of approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

25

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2002

Revenues.Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003, were approximately $3.3 million, a decrease of $0.2 million, as compared to revenues of approximately $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The 6% decrease in revenues in 2003 was primarily attributable to negative pricing pressures that resulted from the highly competitive economic environment that reduced average billing rates for our consultants.

Gross profit.Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2003, was $0.8 million, or 25% of revenues, a decrease of $0.2 million as compared to gross profit of $1.0 million, or 29% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in the amount of gross profit was attributable to a reduction in revenues and a decrease in operating margins caused by our inability to completely offset lower average bill rates with a decrease in corresponding consultant costs.

Sales and marketing.Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $0.4 million, or 13% of revenues, as compared to $0.5 million, or 15% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The $0.1 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003, was primarily attributable to our attempt to match the size of our sales force with the operational requirements of our business.

General and administrative.General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $0.7 million, or 21% of revenues, as compared to $0.6 million, or 18% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The $0.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses in 2003 was primarily attributable to increases in administrative labor cost.

Interest income (expense).Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $11,551, a decrease of $6,107, or 35%, as compared to $17,658 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in interest income in 2003 was primarily attributable to lower interest rates. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $1,304, a decrease of $255, or 16%, as compared to $1,559 in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in interest expense in 2003 was primarily attributable to the elimination of the capital lease obligations.

Net loss.As a result of the above, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $0.3 million, an increase of $0.2 million, as compared to the net loss of approximately $60,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002.

22

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have, since inception, financed our operations and capital expenditures through the sale of preferred and common stock, seller notes, convertible notes, convertible exchangeable debentures, senior secured loans and the proceeds from the exercise of the warrants related to a convertible exchangeable debenture. During 2004 and 2003,the quarter ended March 31, 2005, operations were materially financed with working capital, senior debt and the proceeds from a convertible preferred stock issuance.

Cash used inprovided by operating activities for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, was approximately $0.5 million$2,300 as compared to cash used inprovided by operating activities of approximately $0.3 million$10,400 for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. The decrease in cash balances available for operating activities for the yearsquarters ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, were primarily a result of investments in which we expanded our sales and general and administrative cost structure to implement our growth strategy. Capital expenditures in property and equipment were approximately $15,000$1,000 for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, as compared to capital expenditures in property and equipment of approximately $8,000no material amount for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004.

As of DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, we had a net working capital deficit of approximately $4.0$6.3 million. Excluding the impact of the financial instruments associated with the issuance of the common stock warrants attributable to the preferred stock capital investment by Barron Partners, LP in October 2004 and discussed below, the working capital deficit would be reduced by approximately $3.8$5.7 million, resulting in a net working capital deficit of approximately $0.2$0.6 million.

26

   Our primary source of liquidity consists of approximately $0.5$0.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $3.0$2.3 million of accounts receivable. The increase in accounts receivable was primarily the result of our acquisition of ORC and is attributable to slower processing and collection times associated with the normal billing and collecting cycle of ORC as compared to WidePoint. Current liabilities include approximately $2.4$2.0 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses; $1.6$1.4 million in a line of credit with RBC Centura Bank; and $3.8$5.7 million in financial instruments which may be converted to equity upon the extinguishment of the liquidationliquidated damages clause withi nwithin the registration rights agreement we entered into with Barron Partners, LP.

The market for our servicesmaterial increase in liabilities is experiencing an environment of constrained technology investment resulting from an economic slowdown that has reduced new technology initiatives.  As apredominately the result of this negative environment, the demand for IT consultants ranging from software programmers to network engineers has been negatively affected.  This has reduced demand for consultants, as well as created anacquisition of ORC and the increase in competition from both domestic and foreign firms for the diminished amountcomputed valuation of new and ongoing IT initiatives.  We anticipate a reversalthe financial instrument as of these negative events in the future, as economic growth is restored, the constrainedMarch 31, 2005.

   The business environment in new technology initiatives ebb, andwhich we execute our current mergers and acquisitions strategy.  Therefore, our business environmentoperate is characterized by rapid technological change, experiences times of high growth and contraction and is influenced by material ev entsevents such as mergers and acquisitions that can substantially change our outlook.

Since 2002, we have embarked upon several new initiatives to counter the current negative environment within our industry and expand our capacity to restore revenue growth. We require substantial working capital to fund the future growth of itsour business, particularly to finance accounts receivable, sales and marketing efforts, and capital expenditures. There are currently no commitments for capital expenditures. Future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate of revenue growth, if any, the timing and extent of spending for new product and service development, technological changes and market acceptance of our services.

On October 25 and 29, 2004, we completed financings with Barron Partners L.P. (“Barron”), a private equity fund that engages in investing primarily in private investments in publicly traded entities, for an aggregate amount of $3,580,000, under a preferred stock purchase agreement and related agreements. Net proceeds from the financing after costs and expenses, including fees of finders and agents, were approximately $3,030,000. We issued an aggregate of 2,045,714 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that are convertible into an aggregate of 20,457,143 shares of our Common Stock at a conversion rate equal to $0.175 per share. In addition, we issued to Barron a warrantwarrants to purchase up to an additional 10,228,571 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per common share. The shares of Common Stock which may be acquired by Barron upon its conversion of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and/or the exercise of its warrant are subject to contractual restrictions which restrict the ability of Barron and its affiliates to acquire shares of Common Stock which equal no more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock at any time. This contractual restriction may be removed upon 61 days notice to us from Barron, but in the event Barron elects to remove this restriction, then Barron and its affiliates agreed that Barron and its affiliates can only vote the shares of Common Stock held by Barron and its affiliates which result in Barron and its affiliates having no more than 22% of the total voting power of all outstanding shares of our Common Stock at any time. As a result of the Barron financing transaction, we issued warrants to Westcap Securities, Inc., a registered broker-dealer and our placement agent in such transaction, to purchase 511,428 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, which warrants expire in October 2009.  DuringIn April and May, of 2005, Barron converted a total of 300,000 shares of its preferred stock into 3,000,000 shares of common stock and exercised a portion of its warrants to purchasefor 2,000,000 shares, of common stock.providing us with $800,000 in gross proceeds.

23

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement we entered into with Barron, related to the stock issuances described in the preceding paragraph, we filed a registration statement on January 5, 2005, covering the resale of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion and/or exercise of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the warrants issued to Barron. If our registration statement is not declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission by April 23, 2005 and thereafter kept effective through October 20, 2007, subject to permissible blackout periods and registration maintenance periods, then we willmay be required to pay Barron a maximum penalty of up to $20,000 for each month the registration statement is not effective.

We believe that our current cash position and line of credit is sufficient to meet capital expenditure and working capital requirements for the near term. From a current trend perspective, we believe that the net working capital of $0.6 Million (excluding the loss from Financial Instrument) will improve modestly, as the investment costs of software development programs are substantially reduced and additional proceeds are realized from the exercise of warrants by investors; both of which will be partially offset by incremental working capital needs associated with the projected revenue growth of the business. We are unaware of any additional known trends or uncertainties not described herein that are reasonably likely to result in liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. However, the growth and technological change of the market make it difficult to predict future liquidity requirements with certainty. Over the longer term, we must successfully execute our plans to increase revenue and income streams that will generate significant positive cash flows if we are to sustain adequate liquidity without impairing growth or requiring the infusion of additional funds from external sources. Further, our failure to comply with the restrictive covenants under our revolving credit facilities could result in an event of default, which, if not cured, amended, or waived, could result in us being required to repay these borrowings before their due date. To date any covenants that we have not been compliant with have either been amended or waived and we continue to work with RBC-Centura to structure appropriate covenants that match our present business condition and environment. Although we currently are not in compliance with two of our covenants, which includes our ebitda to debt ratio covenant and our net income covenant, RBC-Centura has waived such violations until such time as we

27

deliver to RBC-Centura our financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 evidencing that we are in compliance with the above covenants. If we are forced to refinance these borrowings on less favorable terms, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected due to the increased cost and interest rate. Additionally, a major expansion, such as occurred with the acquisition of ORC or any other major new subsidiaries, might require external financing that could include additional debt or equity capital. We obtained a one year senior line of credit from RBC-Centura Bank in October 2004 for up to $2.5 million dollars, collateralized against accounts receivables, that also allows for the expansion of this line of credit up to $5.0 million upon the successful completion of an additional acquisition. The interest rate on the line of credit is variable, and is based upon the prime lending rate. Approximately $1.2 million dollars of the senior line of credit was utilized in the acquisition of ORC. In addition, we raised approximately $3.6 million dollars in connection with the aforementioned equity investments by Barron Partners, LP, that were used in the acquisition of ORC. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if required, will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, for future acquisitions and/or growth initiatives.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no existing off-balance sheet arrangements as defined under SEC regulations.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2004 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow in future periods.

(1)     

Other

Inflation has not had a significant effect on our operations, as increased costs have generally been offset by increased prices of products and services sold, although this has been more recently compromised by some of the competitive pricing pressures referenced under Competition in Item 1 of this document.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

28

This report contains forward-looking statements setting forthour beliefs or expectations relating to future revenues and profitability. Actual results may differ materially from projected or expected results due to changes in the demand for our products and services, uncertainties relating to the results of operations, dependence on its major customers, risks associated with rapid technological change and the emerging services market, potential fluctuations in quarterly results, and its dependence on key employees and other risks and uncertainties affecting the technology industry generally. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

29

PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

WIDEPOINT CORPORATION

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information has been prepared by WidePoint Corporation (“WidePoint”) and gives effect to the acquisition of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (“ORC”) completed on October 25, 2004.

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 has been prepared to give effect to the ORC acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2004.   The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 has been prepared to give effect to the ORC acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2004.

The pro forma adjustments, which are based on available information and certain assumptions that WidePoint believes are reasonable under the circumstances, are applied to the historical financial statements of WidePoint and ORC. WidePoint’s preliminary allocation of the ORC purchase price is based upon preliminary estimates of the fair value of net assets acquired. Management believes that the preliminary allocation of the purchase price is reasonable, however, in some cases, the final allocation will be based upon an independent valuation that is not yet complete. As a result, the allocation is subject to revision as additional information becomes available, and such revised allocation could differ from the preliminary allocation.

The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the notes thereto for WidePoint and ORC. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is provided for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what WidePoint’s financial position or results of operations would actually have been had the acquisition occurred on such dates or to project WidePoint’s results of operations or financial position for any future period.

These pro forma financial statements contain certain costs, including expenses allocated to ORC, that WidePoint’s management does not expect will continue. As a result, actual results may differ significantly from the pro forma information presented herein.

30

WIDEPOINT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Twelve months ended December 31, 2004