As Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on JanuaryFebruary 12, 2011

2020

Registration No. 333-169701

333-        

 
UNITED STATES

United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

PRE-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO

FORM S-1/A


S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER THE

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP.

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Nevada 1040 82-0230997
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or
organization)
 
(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)
 
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

7723 North Morton Street
Spokane, WA   99208
 (509) 434-8161

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

1290 Holcomb Avenue

Reno, NV 89502

(775) 337-8057

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,

of registrant'sregistrant’s principal executive offices)

Robert E. Jorgensen,

Rick Havenstrite, CEO

8921 N. Indian Trail Road, #288
Spokane, WA   99208
 (509) 434-8161

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

1290 Holcomb Avenue

Reno, NV 89502

(775) 337-8057

rickh@odcnv.com

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number

including area code, of agentagents for service)

Copies to:

Ronald N. Vance, P.C.

Attorney at Law
1656 Reunion Avenue
Esq.

Pearson Butler, PLLC

1802 W. South Jordan Parkway

Suite 250

200

South Jordan, UT 84095

(801) 446-8802

988-5862

(801) 446-8803254-9427 (fax)

ron@pearsonbutler.com

 


Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective.


If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. x


If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨


If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨


If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ☐¨Accelerated filer ☐¨
Non-accelerated filer ☐¨

Smaller reporting company

x ☒

Emerging growth company ☐


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE 
Title of Each Class
of Securities to be
Registered
 
Amount to be
Registered
  
Proposed Maximum
Offering Price Per
Share (1)
  
Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price
  
Amount of
Registration Fee
 
Common Stock, $.001 par value  7,369,038  $0.70  $5,158,327  $367.79 
Common Stock, $.001 par value  1,437,050(2)(3) $0.70  $1,005,935  $71.72 
TOTAL  8,806,088      $6,164,262  $439.51 

(1) Estimated

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Rule 457 solely for the purpose of calculating the amountSection 7(a)(2)(B) of the registration fee. The selling stockholders will offer to sell the shares of common stock covered by this prospectus at $0.70 per share until our shares of common stock are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, or listed for trading or quoted on any other exchange, and thereafter at prices determined at the time of sale by the selling stockholders.Securities Act. ☐


(2) Represents the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of Series A Preferred Stock issued to DMRJ Group I, LLC on July 14, 2010, based on a conversion price of $0.70 per share.

(3) We are registering 150% of the number of shares presently issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock issued to DMRJ Group I, LLC on July 14, 2010, representing our good faith estimate of the number of shares that may become issuable in the future as a result of conversion price adjustments. The conversion price of the Series A Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment in the event of issuance of common stock at an issue price less than the conversion price at the time of the issuance. If the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock exceeds the registered amount, we will not rely on Rule 416 to cover the additional shares, but will instead file a new registration statement.

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered Amount to be Registered(1)  Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price Per Share(2)  Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(2)  Amount of Registration Fee 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value  6,060,824  $0.40  $2,424,330  $314.68 

(1)Pursuant to Rule 416(a) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), this registration statement shall also cover any additional shares of the registrant’s common stock that become issuable by reason of any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization or other similar transaction effected without receipt of consideration that increases the number of the registrant’s outstanding shares of common stock.

(2)Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o).

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.


 



The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securitiesWe may not be soldsell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting offersan offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.


Preliminary Prospectus

Subject to Completion, dated JanuaryFebruary 12, 2011

2020

PROSPECTUS

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

8,327,071

6,060,824 Shares of Common Stock

This prospectusProspectus relates to the resale by the selling stockholdersoffer and sale from time to time of up to 7,369,0386,060,824 shares of our common stock, including 5,997,610 outstanding shares and up to 1,371,428 shares issuable upon conversionpar value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), of outstanding promissory notesDesert Hawk Gold Corp. (“we,” “our,” “Desert Hawk,” or paymentthe “Company”). We are registering the resale of penalties on the promissory notes.  The shares being offered also include 958,033 shares reserved for issuance upon conversion of our Series A Preferred Stock. The selling stockholders, or their pledgees, donees, transferees or other successors-in-interest, may offer the6,060,824 shares of our common stockCommon Stock (the “Shares’) for resale inby Clifton Mining Company (5,810,824 shares), Keith Moeller (125,000 shares), and Scott Moeller (125,000 shares) (collectively, the over-the-counter market, in isolated transactions, or in a combination of such methods of sale.  The selling shareholders will set a price of $0.70 per share until our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices.  There will be no underwriter’s discounts or commissions, except for the charges to a selling stockholder for sales through a broker-dealer.“Selling Stockholders”). All net proceeds from a sale will go to the selling stockholderSelling Stockholders and not to us. We will payAll costs incurred in the expensesregistration of registering these shares.


Therethe Shares are being borne by the Company.

This is a public offering of our Common Stock, although there is currently no public market for our Common Stock. We intend to apply for the quotation of our Common Stock on an automated quotation system. There can be no assurance that any application for the quotation of our Common Stock on an automated quotation system will be approved. If any such application is not approved and our common stock.   Our stock ultimately is not quoted on an automated quotation system, we intend to engage a market maker to apply for quotation on the Pink SheetsOTCQB Market operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the necessary documents with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA); nor can there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will be approved.

Until such time that our common stock is listed for quotation on an automated quotation system or quoted on the OTC Bulletin BoardOTCQB Market, the Shares offered by the Selling Stockholders will be sold at a fixed price of $0.40 per Share. As of and after such time (if ever) that our Common Stock is quoted on an automated quotation system or quoted on the OTCQB Market, the Shares offered under this Prospectus by the Selling Stockholders may be sold on the public market, in negotiated transactions with a broker-dealer or market maker as principal or agent or in privately negotiated transactions not listed on any exchange.


Investing in our stock involves risks.  You should carefully considerinvolving a broker-dealer, and the Risk Factors beginning on pageprices at which the Selling Stockholders may sell the Shares may be determined by the prevailing market price of the Common Stock at the time of sale, may be different from such prevailing market price or may be determined through negotiated transactions with third parties.

Each Selling Stockholder is an “underwriter” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(11) of the Securities Act.

The offering will terminate three years from the date that the registration statement relating to the Shares is declared effective, unless earlier fully sold or terminated. The Company intends to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part and to allow the Selling Stockholders to offer and sell the Shares for a period of up to two years, unless earlier completely sold, pursuant to Rule 415 of the General Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

INVESTING IN OUR STOCK INVOLVES RISKS.YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISK FACTORS BEGINNING ON PAGE 2 of this prospectus.


OF THIS PROSPECTUS.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus.Prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


The date of this prospectusProspectus is ____________, 2011


2020



TABLE OF CONTENTS


 Page
  
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY1
  
RISK FACTORS2
  
USE OF PROCEEDSFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS118
  
USE OF PROCEEDS9
 
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS9
MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK1210
  
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS11
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS1410
  
BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES2016
  
LEGAL PROCEEDINGSMINING PROPERTIES3617
  
MANAGEMENT3622
  
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION41
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT4529
  
SELLING STOCKHOLDERSDESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK4431
  
DESCRIPTIONPLAN OF COMMON STOCKDISTRIBUTION4731
  
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTIONLEGAL MATTERS4932
  
LEGAL MATTERSEXPERTS5132
  
EXPERTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION5132
  
ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONFINANCIAL STATEMENTS52F-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this Prospectus, any prospectus supplement or in any free writing prospectus we may authorize to be delivered or made available to you. We have not, and the Selling Stockholders have not, authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus.  The selling stockholdersinformation. We and the Selling Stockholders are not offering to sell, andor seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock onlyCommon Stock in jurisdictions where offers and sales are not permitted. The information contained in this Prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this Prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this Prospectus or any sale of shares of our Common Stock.

i


Unless otherwise indicated, any reference to Desert Hawk, or as “we”, “us”, or “our” refers to Desert Hawk Gold Corp. and/or its wholly owned subsidiary, Blue Fin Capital, Inc.



ii


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

The following summary highlights selected material information contained in this prospectus.Prospectus. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before investing in the securities. Before making an investment decision, you should read the entire prospectusProspectus carefully, including the “Risk Factors” section, the financial statements and the notes to the financial statements.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Our Company

Corporate History

Desert Hawk Gold Corp. is an exploration stage company which holds(the “Company”) was incorporated on November 5, 1957, in the State of Idaho as Lucky Joe Mining Company. In 2008 we changed our corporate domicile to the State of Nevada by merging with a wholly-owned subsidiary formed solely for this purpose. Our Nevada corporation was incorporated on July 17, 2008. We have no subsidiaries.

Business Overview

We are currently engaged in the extraction of gold and related precious metals from our Kiewit mining claims in Utah and Arizona.  Through two lease agreements which encompass all of the Utah claims, we intend to conduct exploration and pilot activities on claimsproperty located in the Gold Hill Mining District in Tooele County, Utah.  Within this mining district we hold leasehold interests in 334 unpatented load and placer mining claims, including an unpatented mill site claim, 42 patented claims, and five Utah state mineral leases located on state trust lands, covering approximately 33 square miles.  We also hold eight unpatented lode mining claims in Yavapai County, Arizona, on which we have no current plans to conduct exploration.  Our primary focus will be in the Gold Hill Mining District and we intend to concentrate our activities on the Yellow Hammer lode claims, located on four of the patented claims, seven of the unpatented Kiewit lode claims, and the pilot mill located on the Cactus Mill unpatented mill site.  We intend to maintain our leasehold interest in the additional mining claims and leases in this district for future exploration, if warranted, but we have no current plans to conduct exploration on these additional claims and leases.  We have not identified any proven or probable reserves on any of our mining claims or leases.


We were originally incorporated in the State of Idaho on November 5, 1957, under the name of Lucky Joe Mining Company.  For several years the company bought and sold mining leases and claims, but in 1995 we ceased all principal business operations.  In 2001 control of the company was acquired by Robert E. Jorgensen, John Ryan, and Howard M. Crosby, who purchased a controlling number of shares and assumed management of the company for the purpose of reengaging in mining operations.  Mr. Jorgensen acquired principal stock and management control of the company from Messrs Ryan and Crosby in January 2006.  In 2008 we changed the domicile of the company from the State of Idaho to the State of Nevada by merging the Idaho corporation into a newly formed Nevada corporation which was incorporated on July 17, 2008.  Following the change of domicile, on April 3, 2009, we changed the name of the company to Desert Hawk Gold Corp.  We have one subsidiary, Blue Fin Capital, Inc., which is wholly owned by us and which holds the Arizona mining claims.

In April 2009, we affected a one-for-twelve reverse split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, all references herein to shares outstanding and share issuances have been adjusted to give effect to this stock split.

On July 14, 2010, we entered into an Investment Agreement, which was amended on November 8, 2010 (which we refer to throughout this document as the Investment Agreement) with DMRJ Group I, LLC (which we refer to as DMRJ Group).  Under the terms of the Investment Agreement, we may borrow up to $6,500,000 to fund our mining activities in the Gold Hill Mining District.  We also issued 958,033 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to the DMRJ Group as additional consideration for entering into the Investment Agreement with us.  For a discussion of the terms of the Investment Agreement, see the section heading “Business and Properties – DMRJ Group Investment Agreement” below.  

In fall 2009 we completed 116 drill holes on the Yellow Hammer claims ranging in depth from 16 to 72 feet, totaling approximately 6,000 feet of drilling.  In fall of 2010 we completed the rebuild of the pilot mill on the Cactus Mill site.

Historically, we have generated no revenues from operations, have experienced losses since inception of our current exploration stage on May 1, 2009, and currently rely upon the funds from DMRJ Group to fund our planned exploration activities.  As of January 3, 2011, our cash position was approximately $589,918 and we had received loan advances from DMRJ Group of $2,000,000, plus $313,235 for prepaid interest.  Over the next 12 months we have the following principal objectives:  to continue processing activities at our pilot plant on the Cactus Mill site using mineralized material extracted from the Yellow Hammer claims; to amend our permitted activities at the Cactus Mill property to include a heap leach facility to process material from the Yellow Hammer claims; and to continue the application process for a large mining operations permit for conducting exploration activities on the Kiewit claims and for constructing and operating a heap leach facility near the claims.  We believe that through the financing with DMRJ Group we have sufficient funds available to commence the extraction and processing of mineralized material on the Yellow Hammer project, complete the amendment process for the Cactus Mill leach pad and complete the permitting process for the Kiewit project, including construction of a heap leach facility.  However, the repayment of debt and continued operations beyond this initial stage is dependent upon generating revenue from the processing of mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims at the Cactus Mill pilot plant.

1


Through this prospectus, certain selling stockholders are offering up to 8,327,071 shares of our common stock.  Approximately 1,440,000 of these shares were purchased at $0.70 per share in two non-public offerings sold in 2009 and 2010.  Another 289,584 of these shares were sold at $0.05 per share in a non-public offering in 2008.  Also, 2,713,636 of these shares were issued by us in exchange for the outstanding stock of Blue Fin Capital, Inc. in December 2009.  Approximately 1,254,390 of these shares were issued to the selling stockholders for services preformed for us.  Finally, 300,000 of the shares were issued as bonuses to two parties in connection with loans of $600,000 to us and approximately 1,071,428 shares are issuable upon conversion of these loans and 300,000 are issuable as penalty shares if we fail to repay the loan when due.  In addition, we are registering for resale 958,033 shares issuable upon conversion of our outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

Additional Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 7723 North Morton Street, Spokane, WA 99208.  We maintain a mailing address for1290 Holcomb Ave, Reno, NV 89502, and our company at 8921 N. Indian Trail Road, #288, Spokane, WA   99208.  Our telephone number is (509) 434-8161.(775) 337-8057. We do not maintainhave a company website.


The Offering


We are registering the resale of 6,060,824 shares of Common Stock by the Selling Stockholders named in this Prospectus, or their permitted transferees.

Common stockStock offered by selling stockholders:Selling Stockholders 
Up to 5,997,610 outstanding6,060,824 shares (the “Shares”) of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) owned by the Selling Stockholders.
Common Stock outstanding before and up to 1,371,428 shares issuable upon conversion of or penalty payments under outstanding promissory notes.
Up to 958,033 shares of common stock underlying Series A Preferred Stock
after the offering
26,631,603 shares.
   
Offering Price:price All shares offered by means of this prospectus will be sold at $0.70$0.40 per share until the common stock is our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin BoardOTCQB and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices.
Common stock outstanding:
Before offering
After offering
 
7,586,411
9,915,872 (assuming issuance of 1,371,428 shares upon conversion of our outstanding promissory notes and payment of penalty shares on the promissory notes and issuance of 958,033 shares upon conversion
Term of the outstanding sharesofferingThe Selling Stockholders will determine when and how they will dispose of preferred stock)the Shares registered under this Prospectus for resale.
   
Use of proceeds:proceeds We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stockCommon Stock by the selling stockholders.Selling Stockholders.
Risk factorsWe are subject to general risks associated with mineral extraction operations.  There is also no public market for our Common Stock and no assurance that any public trading market for our shares will develop in the future.  See “Risk Factors” below.

RISK FACTORS


Investment in our common stock has a high degree of risk.  Before you invest you should carefully consider the

The following risks and uncertainties, described below andtogether with the other information set forth in this prospectus.  If anyProspectus, should be carefully considered by those who invest in our securities. Any of the following risks actually occur,could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results and financial condition could be harmed anddecrease the value of our common stock could go down.  This means you could lose all or a part of your investment.


2


Common Stock.

Risks RelatedRelating to Our Company and its Business


If we fail to repay the loan advances from DMRJ Group in a timely manner or otherwise breach our agreement with this lender, we would likely lose our interest in our mining leases and other assets.

Our loan advances from DMRJ Group under the Investment Agreement

We have obligations which are secured by all of our assets, including our mining leases and equipment.  Each separate loan advance to us pursuant toassets. If there is an occurrence of an uncured event of default, the Investment Agreement provides for a specific repayment date of principal and, to the extent interestfunding party can foreclose on the loan is not prepaid at the time of the particular loan advance, we have monthly obligations to pay interest on the amount borrowed after the first year of the loan advance.  Repayment of loan advances made for our Yellow Hammer claims commences in March 2011 and advances made for the Kiewit property must be repaid commencing seven months after the first advance.  All outstanding balances on any other advances are due upon maturity, which is July 13, 2012.  The Investment Agreement also contains numerous affirmative and negative covenants which require us to perform certain obligations or refrain from certain actions so long as any amounts are owed to DMRJ Group under the Investment Agreement.  If we fail to meet all of our covenants under the agreement or if we fail toassets, which would make any stock in the Company worthless.

We have entered into a Purchase Agreement with PDK Utah Holdings, LP, pursuant to which the obligation to deliver gold against cash advances was secured by all of our assets. We are required paymentto commence delivery of principal or interest when due, it is likely that DMRJ Group would callgold in December 2020. In the full amount of the outstanding balances on our loans immediately due.  Ifevent we are unable to repaymake delivery of the outstanding balances at this time, we anticipate that DMRJ Group wouldgold when due, PDK may foreclose on its security interest andall of our assets. In the event PDK forecloses on our assets, any stock in the Company would likely take control of or liquidate our mining leases and other assets.  Because the Investment Agreement limitshave no value. Our ability to make gold deliveries on these cash advances when due, will depend upon our ability to raise outside funds during the effective periodsuccessfully develop our Kiewit mining project.

The value of the Investment Agreement, itour property is unlikely that we would be ablesubject to obtain alternate financing to satisfy the obligations owed to DMRJ Groupvolatility in the event of foreclosure.  If we lose our mining leases and other assets to DMRJ Group in foreclosure, we would not be able to continue our business operations as currently planned and you would lose your entire investment in our common stock.


Because of our historic losses from operations since the inception of our exploration stage on May 1, 2009, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our auditor’s report on our 2009 consolidated financial statements includes an additional explanatory paragraph that states that our recurring losses from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  These consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, were prepared on the basis that our company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations.  Our ability to continue as a going concern is uncertain and dependent upon continuing to obtain the financing necessary to meet our financial commitments and to complete the exploration of our mining properties and/or realizing proceeds from the sale of mineralized material from the properties.  Our continuation as a going concern is primarily dependent upon the continued financing from DMRJ Group under the Investment Agreement and the attainment of profitable operations.  As at September 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $409,700, negative working capital of ($1,032,364), and accumulated losses of $2,968,087 since inception of our current exploration stage.  These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.  Neither our 2009 audited financial statements nor our interim unaudited financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

If we fail to meet certain milestones in our funding agreement with DMRJ Group, we will not have access to the full amount of the funds available under this arrangement, which could materially hamper our ability to continue our planned operations.

Management anticipates that the minimum cash requirements to fund our proposed exploration program can only be met through our financing arrangement with DMRJ Group.  In order to continue to borrow funds under our Investment Agreement with DMRJ Group, we are required to meet certain milestones in our operations.  For the final two $500,000 advances related to the Yellow Hammer project, we must have commenced mining of copper from the property.  For advances on the Kiewit project we must have obtained and be in compliance with all environmental and mining permits for the project and have paid our initial Yellow Hammer advance repayment amount for the month of February 2011.  This repayment amount is $511,616.  If we fail to meet these milestones, these funds will not be available to us and we have no other source for funding to continue our planned activities.

3


If we are unable to generate revenue from the sale of mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims, we will likely not be able to continue our operations.

We have no history of producing metals from any of our properties.  Our properties are all exploration stage properties in various stages of exploration and we have no proven or probable reserves on any of these properties. The first phase of our business plan is to process mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims at the pilot plant and sell any concentrate produced by us from the Cactus Mill pilot plant.  We have not completed any feasibility study of the Yellow Hammer claims and there are no known or established commercially minable deposit for extraction on these claims and no known mineral deposit which could be economically extracted.  We also have no firm off-take agreements for any concentrate produced by us.  If the mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims fails to produce concentrate that can be sold at a profit for a sufficient period to repay our outstanding debt to DMRJ Group and others, it is unlikely that we would be able to continue any operations or explore our other mining properties and it is probable that our proposed business would fail.

We have a history of losses and are dependent upon revenue from our planned operations through our Cactus Mill pilot plant to continue our proposed operations.

In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we had net losses of $518,219.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we had comprehensive losses of $2,482,403.  Since the commencement of our exploration stage on May 1, 2009, we have experienced accumulated losses of $2,968,087.  We have not commenced commercial production on any of our mineral properties.  We have no revenues from operations and anticipate we will have no operating revenues until we commence mineralized material processing operations on one or more of our properties.  All of our properties are in the exploration stage, and we have no known mineral reserves on our properties. Even if we generate revenue from mineralized material on the Yellow Hammer or other claims, we may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future.  If we do not begin to generate revenues before our current cash resources expire, we will either have to suspend or cease operations, in which case you will lose your investment.

Although we intend to commence the processing of mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims, we do not have any proven or probable reserves on this site.  As a result we may not be able to locate mineral deposits or reserves on this site which could be economically and legally extracted or produced.

Our first phase of proposed operations includes processing mineralized material from our Yellow Hammer claims at our pilot plant on our Cactus Hill property.  Nevertheless, we have not identified any proven or probable reserves on these claims which makes these extraction operations on them very speculative.  If we are not able to quickly locate mineralized material which can be economically extracted and produced, the funds we spend on these claims may be lost which could have a material negative impact on our ability to continue operations.

Changes in the market prices of copper, gold and other metals, which in the past have fluctuated widely, will affect the profitability of our proposed operations and financial condition.

Our potential profitability and long-term viability depend, in large part, upon the market price of copper, gold and other metals and minerals which may be extracted from our mining claims and leases.  The market price of copper, gold and other metals is volatile and is impacted by numerous factors beyond our control, including:
·expectations with respect to the rate of inflation;
·the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and certain other currencies;
·interest rates;
·global or regional political or economic conditions;
·supply and demand for jewelry and industrial products containing metals; and
·sales by central banks and other holders, speculators and producers of gold and other metals in response to any of the above factors.

4


We cannot predict the effect of these factors on metal prices.  In particular, gold and copper prices have fluctuated during the last several years.  The price of copper (London Fix) has ranged from approximately $1.50 to approximately $3.25 per ounce during calendar 2009, closing at approximately $3.25 on December 30, 2009; from approximately $2.78 to approximately $4.41 per ounce during 2010 to close on December 31, 2010, at approximately $4.41 per ounce.  The price of gold (London Fix) has ranged from $810 to $1,212 per ounce during calendar 2009, closing at $1,087 on December 30, 2009; from $1,052 to $1,426 per ounce during 2010 to close on December 31, 2010, at $1,410.25 per ounce.  A decreaseand any other deposits we may seek or locate.

Our profitability will be significantly affected by changes in the market price of copper, gold and silver, and other metals could affect the commercial viabilityminerals. These mineral prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors, all of which are beyond our properties and our anticipated exploration of such properties in the future.  Lower copper or gold prices could also adversely affect our ability to finance exploration of our properties.


In addition, the makeup of gold investors and users has changed significantly which has affectedcontrol. For example, the price of gold can be influenced by the sale or purchase of gold by central banks and financial institutions; interest rates; currency exchange rates; speculation; inflation or deflation; fluctuation in particularthe value of the United States dollar and other currencies; global and regional supply and demand, including investment, industrial and jewelry demand; and the political and economic conditions of major gold producing countries throughout the world, such as Russia and South Africa. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years.  Historically, the demand for gold was driven by the needs of jewelers, dentistsyears, and electronics manufacturers who used gold in their businesses.  In 1998 investors in gold accounted for only 6.9% of demand.  During 2009 they accounted for 39% anda decline in the second quarterprice of 2010, they accounted for 51%.  During the first quarter of 2009, when the stock market was at its lowest, investors accounted for 60% of the demand for gold.  This shift in demand for gold or other minerals could mean that positive changescause a significant decrease in the macro-economyvalue of our property, limit our ability to raise money, and render continued exploration and development of our property impracticable. If that happens, then we could lead investorslose our rights to our property and be compelled to sell some or all of these rights. Additionally, the future development of our mining properties is heavily dependent upon the level of metals prices remaining sufficiently high to make the development of our property economically viable. An investor may lose its investment if the price of these minerals substantially decreases. The greater the decrease in the price of gold in large quantities, whichor other minerals, the more likely it is that an investor will lose money.

To continue our operations, we may need to obtain additional financing from PDK or outside sources.

Other than future advances by PDK, we have no firm commitments or agreements to provide additional funding to have sufficient capital to fund our operations as they are currently planned or to fund the acquisition and exploration of new properties. We also may be unable to secure additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Our inability to raise additional funds on a timely basis could result in dramatically decreased demandprevent us from achieving our business objectives and lower prices for gold.  These lower prices could have a negative impact on our proposed business.


Webusiness, financial condition, results of operations and the value of our securities. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership of existing stockholders may be diluted and the securities that we may issue in the future may have significant cash commitments underrights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current holders of our lease agreements and ifcommon stock. Such securities may also be issued at a discount to the fair market value of our common stock, resulting in possible further dilution to the book value per share of common stock. If we fail to meet these obligations,raise additional funds by issuing debt, we could losebe subject to debt covenants that could place limitations on our rightoperations and financial flexibility.

2

Our management may have conflicts of interest and only devote a portion of their business time to conduct mining activities on these claims.


Underus which could materially and adversely affect us and our current lease agreementsbusiness.

Most of our management does not work for our claims in the Gold Hill Mining District, we are obligated to commence operations of the claims within three yearsus exclusively and pay annual maintenance costssome serve on the claims.  The annual claim maintenance costs, including annual maintenance fees payableboards of other companies, although we do not consider any of these other companies to the BLMbe our direct competitors. Nevertheless, these other responsibilities may take away from time and focus of these parties on their responsibilities as management of our Company. It is possible that a conflict of interest may arise based on management’s other employment or board activities. Situations may arise where members of our management are presented with business opportunities which may be desirable not only for us, but also for the unpatented claims, the annual state trust lands mineral lease fees, and property tax paymentsother companies with which they are substantial.  For 2010 and following yearsaffiliated.

We do not know if our properties contain any gold, silver, copper, tungsten, or other precious minerals that can be mined at a profit.

The properties on which we are responsible for these costs.  If we fail to make these maintenance, tax and other payments, we may losehave the right to continueexplore for and mine precious minerals are not known to have any proven or probable reserves. Whether a precious mineral deposit can be mined at a profit depends upon many factors. Some but not all of these factors include: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; operating costs and capital expenditures required to start mining activities ona deposit; the claims.  In addition, pursuantavailability and cost of financing; the price of the gold or other mineral which is highly volatile and cyclical; and government regulations, including regulations relating to the termsprices, taxes, royalties, land use, importing and exporting of our lease agreements, if we failminerals and environmental protection. We are also obligated to commence commercial scale operationspay royalties and taxes on certain of the claims priorour mining activities, which will make our ability to July 2012,operate profitably more difficult.

We are a junior mining company with limited operating mining activities, and we will be required to pay $50,000 for an annual holding fee to retain rights to these claims.  We have paid the 2010 maintenance costs in the aggregate amount of $46,760 for the unpatented claims in the Gold Hill Mining District.  We also paid $6,890 for the 2010 mineral lease fees on two of the Utah mineral leases.  We also paid $6,024 for 2010 property taxes on the Utah patented claims.  We anticipate that future annual fees will be comparable, and if we are unable to pay these fees from DMRJ Group loan advances or revenue generated from our extraction activities in the future, we would lose our interest in all of our claims and leases.


We may not be able to obtain all required permitsincrease our mining activities in the future.

Our business is mining for gold, silver and licensesother precious minerals. Mining operations in the United States are subject to commence exploration activities on our properties, or the permitting process could be delayed, which could cause delays in our proposed plan of operations or increase the cost of those planned operations.


Our current proposedmany different federal, state and future operations, including the initial extraction and processing of mineralized material from our Yellow Hammer claims, require permits from governmental authorities and such operations are and will be governed bylocal laws and regulations, governing exploration, taxes, labor standards, occupationalincluding stringent environmental, health waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mineand safety and other matters.  Companies engaged in exploration oflaws. In the event we increase operations on our mining properties, and related facilities generally experience increased costs, and delays in these activities and other schedules as a result of the needit is possible that we will be unable to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits.  Our current Small Mining Operations Permit for the Yellow Hammer claims is limited to operations in an area within five acres.  Management anticipates that this permit will be sufficient for planned extraction activities on the Yellow Hammer claims for only one to three years and would not permit commencement of operations on the Kiewit claims.  We do not have in place the necessary permits to commence operations on the Kiewit claims.  A Large Mining Operations Permit for the Kiewit claims will require an extensive environmental assessment or preparation of a Plan of Operation.  We have a permit to operate our proposed pilot plant on the Cactus Mill property, but do not have the required permits to add a planned heap leach facility near this property or for the Kiewit claims.  We cannot predict if all permits which may be required for continued exploration activities or construction of facilities will be obtainable on reasonable terms or within the periods planned by us.  Costs related to applying for and obtaining permits and licenses may be prohibitive and could delay our planned exploration activities.  Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions.

5


Our activities are subject to environmentalfuture laws and regulations, that may increase our costs of doing business and restrict our planned mineral extraction and processing activities.

All phases of our planned mineral extraction and processing activities are subject to environmental regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate, in particular Tooele County, Utah.  Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees.  These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations.  A Large Mining Operations Permit for our Kiewit claims will also require an extensive environmental assessment or preparation of a Plan of Operation.  Compliance with environmental laws and regulations and future changes in these laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays and may cause material changes or delays in our operations and future activities.can change at any time. It is possible that future changes into these laws will be adverse to our mining operations. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays and require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, adversely affecting any potential mining operations. Our future mining operations may also be subject to liability for pollution or regulations couldother environmental damage. We are not currently insured against this risk because of high insurance costs.

We have a significant adverse impact onshort operating history, have only lost money and may never achieve any meaningful revenue.

Our operating history consists of limited operations and continuation of preliminary exploration activities. Our expenses have consistently exceeded the revenue generated from our propertiesmining operations. Exploring for and mining precious minerals or some portion of our business, causing us to re-evaluate those activities at that time.


Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive.

In addition to the current reclamation bonds posted by us, we will likely have additional reclamation requirements associated with our Large Mining Operations Permit for which we have applied for the Kiewit claims.  Reclamation requirements by governmental authorities are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long-term effects of land disturbance. Reclamation may include requirements to control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents and reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance land forms and vegetation. In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with our potential exploration activities, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration programs.  If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial positionis an inherently speculative activity. Our revenue could be adversely affected.

We are dependent upon the servicesaffected by many outside influences and we may never achieve revenue in amounts sufficient to provide for payment of our President to provide the principal mining expertise for our proposed exploration activities.  The loss of Mr. Havenstrite could delay our business plan or increase the costs associated with our plan.

Other than our President, Rick Havenstrite, our officers and directors have no professional accreditation or formal training in the business of mineral exploration.  With no direct training or experience these other members of our management team may not be fully aware of many of the specific requirements related to working within this industry.  Decisions so made without this knowledge may not take into account standard engineering management approaches that experienced exploration corporations commonly make.  Consequently, our business, earnings and ultimate financial success could suffer irreparable harm as a result of management’s lack of experience in the industry.  The loss of our President could adversely affect our business.  We have an employment agreement with Mr. Havenstrite for an initial period of four years until 2014.  However, we do not maintain key-man insurance on Mr. Havenstrite.  We may not be able to hire and retain personnel in the future, or the cost to retain replacement personnel may be excessive, in the event Mr. Havenstrite becomes unavailable for any reason.

Title to our properties may be subject to other claims, which could affect ourexpenses.

Our property rights and claims.


There are risks that title to our properties may be challenged or impugned.  Our principal properties are located in Utah and may be subject to prior unrecorded transfer agreements and royalty rights and title may be affected by other undetected defects.  There may be validchallenged. We are not insured against any challenges, to the title of our properties which, if successful, could impair exploration operations on the claims.  This is particularly the case in respect of our properties through which we hold our interest solely pursuant to leases with the claim holders, as such interests are substantially based on contract as opposed to a direct interest in the property.

6


Several of the mineral rightsimpairments or defects to our properties consistmineral claims or property title.

Our property is comprised of patented and unpatented mininglode claims created and maintained in accordance with the U.S.federal General Mining Law.Law of 1872. Unpatented mininglode claims are unique U.S. property interests and are generally considered to be subject to greater title risk than other real property interests because the validity of unpatented mininglode claims is often uncertain. This uncertainty arises, in part, out of the complex federal and state laws and regulations under the U.S. General Mining Law, includingLaw. Until the requirementclaims are surveyed, the precise location of a proper physical discovery of valuable minerals within the boundaries of each claimthe claims may be in doubt and proper compliance with physical staking requirements.  Also,our claims subject to challenge. If we discover mineralization that is close to the claims’ boundaries, it is possible that some or all of the mineralization may occur outside the boundaries. In such a case we would not have the right to extract those minerals. This uncertainty leaves us exposed to potential title suits. Defending any challenges to our property title will be costly and may divert funds that could otherwise be used for exploration activities and other purposes. In addition, unpatented mininglode claims are always subject to possible challenges by third parties or validity contests by the federal government.  government, which, if successful, may prevent us from exploiting our discovery of commercially extractable gold. Challenges to our title may increase our costs of operation or limit our ability to explore on certain portions of our property. We are not insured against challenges, impairments or defects to our property title, nor do we intend to carry title insurance in the future.


We may not be able to maintain the infrastructure necessary to conduct mining activities.

Our mining activities depend upon adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources and water supply are important factors which affect capital and operating costs. Unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, sabotage, government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure could adversely affect our mining activities and financial condition.

Our mining activities may be adversely affected by the local climate.

The validitylocal climate sometimes affects our mining activities on our properties. Earthquakes, heavy rains, snowstorms, and floods could result in serious damage to or the destruction of an unpatentedfacilities, equipment or means of access to our property, or could occasionally prevent us temporarily from conducting mining or mill site claim, in termsactivities on our property. Because of both itstheir rural location and the lack of developed infrastructure in the area, our mineral properties in Utah are occasionally impassible during the winter season. During this time, it may be difficult for us to access our property, maintain production rates, make repairs, or otherwise conduct mining activities on them.

Risks Relating to the Mining Industry

Mining for precious metals is an inherently speculative business. The properties on which we have the right to mine for precious minerals are not known to have any proven or probable reserves. If we are unable to extract gold, silver, or any other resources which can be mined at a profit, our business could fail.

Natural resource mining, and precious metal mining, in particular, is a business that by its maintenance,nature is dependent on strict compliance withspeculative. There is a complex bodystrong possibility that we will not discover gold, silver, or any other resources which can be mined or extracted at a profit. Even if we do discover and mine precious metal deposits, the deposits may not be of federal and state statutory and decisional law.  In addition, there are few public records that definitively determine the issuesquality or size necessary for us or a potential purchaser of validity and ownership of unpatentedthe property to make a profit from mining claims.  Should the federal government impose a royalty or additional tax burdens on theit. Few properties that lie within public lands,are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Unusual or unexpected geological formations, geological formation pressures, fires, power outages, labor disruptions, flooding, explosions, cave-ins, landslides and the resultinginability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor are just some of the many risks involved in mineral exploration programs and the subsequent development of gold deposits. If we are unable to extract gold, silver, or any other resources which can be mined at a profit, our business could fail.

Our business is subject to extensive environmental regulations which may make exploring or mining prohibitively expensive, and which may change at any time.

All of our operations couldare subject to extensive environmental regulations which can make exploration expensive or prohibit it altogether. We may be seriously impacted, depending uponsubject to potential liabilities associated with the typepollution of the environment and the disposal of waste products that may occur as the result of exploring and other related activities on our properties. We may have to pay to remedy environmental pollution, which may reduce the amount of money that we have available to use for exploration. This may adversely affect our financial position, which may cause loss of investor investment. If we are unable to fully remedy an environmental problem, we might be required to suspend operations or to enter into interim compliance measures pending the burden.


We do not maintain insurance with respectcompletion of the required remedy. If a decision is made to certain high-risk activities, which exposes us tomine our properties our potential exposure for remediation may be significant, risk of loss.

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk.  Hazards such as unusual or unexpected formations or other conditions are often encountered.  Weand this may become subject to liability for pollution or hazards against which we cannot insure or against which we cannot maintain insurance at commercially reasonable premiums.  Any significant claim would have a material adverse effect upon our business and financial position. All of our exploration and, if warranted, development activities may be subject to regulation under one or more local, state and federal environmental impact analyses and public review processes. It is possible that future changes in applicable laws, regulations and permits or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could have significant impact on some portion of our business, which may require our business to be economically re-evaluated from time to time. These risks include, but are not limited to, the risk that regulatory authorities may increase bonding requirements beyond our financial positioncapability. Inasmuch as posting of bonding in accordance with regulatory determinations is a condition to the right to operate under all material operating permits, increases in bonding requirements could prevent operations even if we are in full compliance with all substantive environmental laws. We have been required to post substantial bonds under various laws relating to mining and prospects.the environment and may in the future be required to post further bonds to pursue additional activities. We may be unable or unwilling to post such additional bonds which could prevent us from realizing any commercial mining success or commencing mining activities.


Market forces or unforeseen developments may prevent us from obtaining the supplies, equipment and skilled manpower necessary to explore for mineral resources.

Precious metals exploration, and resource exploration in general, is a very competitive business. Competitive demands for contractors and unforeseen shortages of supplies and/or equipment could result in the disruption of our planned exploration and production activities. Current demand for exploration drilling services, equipment and supplies is robust and could result in suitable equipment and skilled manpower being unavailable at scheduled times for our exploration and production programs. Fuel prices are not currently covered by any form of environmental liability insurance, since insurance against such risks, including liabilityextremely volatile as well. We will attempt to locate suitable equipment, materials, manpower and fuel if sufficient funds are available. If we cannot find the equipment, supplies and skilled manpower needed for pollution, is prohibitively expensive.  Weour various exploration and production programs, we may have to suspend operationssome or take interim cost compliance measures if we are unable to fully fund the costall of remedying an environmental problem, if any of these uninsured events were to occur.


A shortage ofthem until equipment, and supplies, couldfunds and/or skilled manpower become available. Any such disruption in our activities may adversely affect our abilityexploration activities and financial condition.

Risks Relating to operateOur Organization and Common Stock

There is currently no market for our business.


We arecommon stock, and we cannot ensure that one will ever develop or be sustained.

There is currently no public market for our common stock. There can be no assurance that there will be an active market for our shares of common stock either now or in the future. If an active market is established, the market liquidity will be dependent on various suppliesthe perception of our operating business, among other things. We will take certain steps including utilizing investor awareness campaigns, press releases, road shows and equipmentconferences to carry outincrease awareness of our exploration activities.  These include crushing services for mineralized material from our Yellow Hammer claims, road grading services, chemicalsbusiness and maintenance equipment for our pilot plant, and parts and supplies for our extraction and hauling equipment.  We haveany steps that we might take to bring us to the awareness of investors may require we compensate consultants with cash and/or stock. There can be no long-term agreements to provide these suppliesassurance that there will be any awareness generated or services.  The shortagethe results of such supplies, equipment and parts could have a material adverse effectany efforts will result in any impact on our abilitytrading volume. Consequently, investors may not be able to carry out our operationsliquidate their investment or liquidate it at a price that reflects the value of the business and therefore limit or increase the cost of our exploration activities.


Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.

The mining industry is intensely competitive.  Significant competition exists for the acquisition of properties producing or capable of producing gold or other metals.  Wetrading may be at an inflated price relative to the performance of our company due to, among other things, availability of sellers of our shares. If a competitive disadvantage in acquiring additional mining properties evenmarket should develop, the price may be highly volatile. Because there may be a low price for our shares of common stock, many brokerage firms or clearing firms may not be willing to effect transactions in the Gold Hill Mining District because we must compete withsecurities or accept our shares for deposit in an account. Even if an investor finds a broker willing to effect a transaction in the shares of our common stock, the combination of brokerage commissions, transfer fees, taxes, if any, and any other individualsselling costs may exceed the selling price. Further, many lending institutions will not permit the use of low-priced shares of common stock as collateral for any loans.

Our principal shareholders, officers and companies, many of which have greater financial resources, operational experience and technical capabilities than we have.  We may also encounter increasing competition from other mining companiesdirectors own a substantial interest in our efforts to hire experienced mining professionals.  Competition for exploration resources at all levels is currently very intense, particularly affecting the availability of manpower, drill rigs, mining equipmentvoting stock and production equipment.  Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to attract future capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.


We compete with larger, better capitalized competitors in the mining industry.

The mining industry is competitive in all of its phases, including financing, technical resources, personnel and property acquisition.  It requires significant capital, technical resources, personnel and operational experience to effectively compete in the mining industry.  Because of the high costs associated with exploration, the expertise required to analyze a project’s potential and the capital required to explore a mine, larger companies with significant resources mayinvestors will have a competitive advantage over us.  We face strong competition from other mining companies,limited voice in particular Rio Tinto which operates a large copper mine inour management.

Our principal shareholders, including the area, some with greater financial resources, operational experience and technical capabilities than we have.  As a result of this competition, we may be unable to maintain or acquire future financing, personnel, technical resources or attractive mining properties on terms we consider acceptable or at all.


7


Increased commodity and labor costs could affect our financial condition.

We anticipate that costs at our Gold Hill projects will frequently be subject to variation from one year to the next due to a number of factors, such as changing grades of mineralized material, metallurgy and revisions to mine plans, if any, in response to the physical shape and location of the mineral body.  In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities such as fuel, chemicals and electricitySelling Stockholders, as well as labor costs.  Such commodities are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make exploration activities at certain operations less profitable.  We do not have firm contracts or commitments for the commodities or all labor in connection with the exploration or extraction activities on the mining claims.  A material increase in these costs could have a significant effect on our cost of operationsofficers and potential profitability.

Transportation difficulties and weather interruptions may affect and delay proposed activities and could impact our proposed business.
Our mining properties are accessible by road and there are no other means of transportation available such as rail or navigable water ways.  The climatedirectors, in the area is hot and dry inaggregate beneficially own a majority of our outstanding common stock, including shares of common stock issuable upon exercise or conversion within 60 days of the summer but cold and subject to snow indate of this filing.Additionally, the winter, which could at times hamper accessibility depending on the winter season precipitation levels.  Significant snowfall could make accessing our properties difficult or impossible by truck.  As a result, our exploration plans could be delayed for certain periods each year. These delays could affect our ability to process and transport mineralized material from the claims to the pilot plant which could have a material impact on our ability to generate revenue.

Our directors and officers may have conflicts of interest as a result of their relationships with other companies.

Certainholdings of our officers and directors are also directors, officers or shareholders of other companies that are similarly engaged may increasein the businessfuture upon vesting or other maturation of acquiring, exploring and exploiting mining properties.  For example, John Ryan, oneexercise rights under any of the options they currently hold or which may in the future be granted or if they otherwise acquire additional shares of our common stock.

As a result of their ownership and positions, our principal shareholders, directors also servesand executive officers collectively are able to influence all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the following matters:

election of our directors;

amendment of our articles of incorporation or bylaws; and

effecting or preventing a merger, sale of assets or other corporate transaction.

In addition, their stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company, which in turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our shareholders from realizing a premium over our stock price.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of federal securities laws, and compliance with such requirements can be expensive and may divert resources from other projects, thus impairing our ability to grow.

We are subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as a director for Gold Crest Mines, Inc., Trend Mining Company, Lucky Friday Extension Mining Company, Inc., Mineral Mountain Mining and Milling Company, Tintic Standard Gold Mines, Inc., Consolidated Goldfields, Inc.amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Silver Verde May Mining Company, Inc.  Consequently, there is a possibility thatother federal securities laws, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and the Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission and furnishing audited reports to stockholders will cause our directors and/or officersexpenses to be higher than they would have been if we were privately held.

It may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop, implement and maintain the internal controls and reporting procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act. We may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal controls and other finance personnel in a positionorder to develop and implement appropriate internal controls and reporting procedures.

If we fail to establish and maintain an effective system of conflict in the future.  In addition, our President, Rick Havenstrite, dedicates part of his time to operating his overhead door business in Reno, Nevada, which means that he is not able to devote all of his business time to our company.


We do not have water currently available in sufficient quantity to operate our planned leaching facility near the Kiewit claims, and if we are unable to produce sufficient water,internal control, we may not be able to commence planned activities on these claims.

The Kiewit claims are located in an arid high desert climate with no other water source than may be provided through a well.  We have not testedreport our financial results accurately or to prevent fraud. Any inability to report and file our financial results accurately and timely could harm our reputation and adversely impact the area near the claimstrading price of our common stock.

Effective internal control is necessary for the proposed well or any other water source sufficientus to operate the planned Kiewit leaching facility.  In addition, if the water table for the planned well is deeper than we estimate, the cost of constructingprovide reliable financial reports and maintaining the well may increase.prevent fraud. If we are unable to locate a suitable water source by means of the proposed wellcannot provide reliable financial reports or otherwise,prevent fraud, we may not be able to proceedmanage our business as effectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business and reputation with investors may be harmed. As a result, our proposed activities on the Kiewit claims, which could alsosmall size and any current internal control deficiencies may adversely affect our abilityfinancial condition, results of operation and access to secure necessary operating permitscapital. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with any policies and procedures may deteriorate.

Public company compliance may make it more difficult to attract and retain officers and directors.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. As a public company, we expect these rules and regulations to increase our compliance costs in 2020 and beyond and to make certain activities more time consuming and costly. As a public company, we also expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the leaching facilitysame or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and future loan advances from DMRJ.


8


Risks Relatedretain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers, and to maintain insurance at reasonable rates, or at all.

Our Common Stock


There is currently no public tradingstock price may be volatile.

If a market for our common stock is ever established, the market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which meansare beyond our control, including the following:

our inability to maintain existing permits;

changes in the prices of gold and silver;

changes in our industry;

competitive pricing pressures;

our ability to obtain working capital financing;

additions or departures of key personnel;

limited “public float” in the hands of a small number of persons whose sales or lack of sales could result in positive or negative pricing pressure on the market price for our common stock;

our ability to execute our business plan;

sales of our common stock;

operating results that fall below expectations;

loss of any strategic relationship;

regulatory developments;

economic and other external factors; and

period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results; and inability to develop or acquire new or needed technology.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that youare unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We have not paid cash dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future. Any return on investment may be requiredlimited to holdthe value of our common stock.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our common stock will depend on earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors affecting us at such time as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on your shares ininvestment will only occur if our companystock price appreciates.

Our common stock may be deemed a “penny stock,” which would make it more difficult for an indefinite period.


our investors to sell their shares.

Our common stock may be subject to the “penny stock” rules adopted under Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act. The penny stock rules generally apply to companies whose common stock is not quoted on either the OTC Bulletin Board or the Pink Sheets and is not listed on any exchange.  Until the common stock is quoted on an electronic quotation serviceNASDAQ Stock Market or listed on another national securities exchange it is unlikely that any public market for the common stock will be established.  It is unlikely that our company would qualify for listing on a stock exchange in the near future, if ever.  Application for quotation on an electronic quotation service requires finding a market maker willing to make the application.  The application process entails review by FINRA, the self-regulated industry processer of these applications, and may take several months.  The application process cannot commence until the registration of which this prospectus is a part is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  We have not identified any broker-dealers who may be willing to make application on our behalf.


Because our shares are designated as Penny Stock, broker-dealers will be less likely to trade in our stock in the future due to, among other items, the requirements for broker-dealers to disclose to investors the risks inherent in penny stocks and to make a determination that the investment is suitable for the purchaser.

Our shares are designated as “penny stock” as defined in Rule 3a51-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act and thus, if a public market for the stock develops in the future, may be more illiquid than shares not designated as penny stock.  The SEC has adopted rules which regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks.”  Penny stocks are defined generally as non-NASDAQ equity securities with a price oftrades at less than $5.00$4.00 per share;share, other than companies that are not traded on a “recognized” national exchange; or in issuers with net tangible assets less than $2,000,000, if the issuer has been in continuous operation forhave had average revenue of at least three years, or $10,000,000, if in continuous operation for less than three years, or with average revenues of less than $6,000,000 for the last three years.  Theyears or that have tangible net worth of at least $5,000,000 ($2,000,000 if the company has been operating for three or more years). These rules require, among other things, that brokers who trade penny stock rules requireto persons other than “established customers” complete certain documentation, make suitability inquiries of investors and provide investors with certain information concerning trading in the security, including a broker-dealer to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, to provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account, to make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction.  These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity, if any, in the secondary market for a stock that is subject to the penny stock rules.  Since our securities are subject to the penny stock rules, investors in the shares may find it more difficult to sell their shares in any market which may develop in the future.quote information under certain circumstances. Many brokers have decided not to trade in penny stocks because of the requirements of the penny stock rules and, as a result, the number of broker-dealers willing to act as market makers in such securities is limited. The reduction inIf we remain subject to the number of available market makers and other broker-dealers willing to trade in penny stocks may limit the ability of purchasers in this offering to sell their stock in any secondary market which could develop in the future.  These penny stock regulations, and the restrictions imposedrules for any significant period, it could have an adverse effect on the resale of penny stocks by these regulations, could adversely affect our stock pricemarket, if a public trading marketany, for our securities. If our securities are subject to the penny stock rules, investors will find it more difficult to dispose of our securities.

Exercise of options or future convertible instruments may have a dilutive effect on our common stock.

We have outstanding vested options to purchase 2,400,000 shares of our common stock at $0.40 per share. If the price per share of our common stock at the time of exercise of these or future options or warrants, or conversion of any future convertible notes or any other convertible securities is established in excess of the future.

various exercise or conversion prices of such convertible securities, exercise or conversion of such convertible securities would have a dilutive effect on our common stock. Further, any additional financing that we secure may require the granting of rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock and which result in additional dilution of the existing ownership interests of our common stockholders.


Our boardArticles of directors can, without stockholder approval, cause preferred stock to be issued on terms that adversely affect common stockholders.


Under our articles of incorporation,Incorporation allow for our board of directors is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 sharescreate new series of preferred stock only 958,033 of which are issued and outstanding as of the date of this prospectus, and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or actionapproval by our stockholders, except as limited by the rights under our Series A Preferred Stock.  If the board causes any additional preferred stock to be issued,which could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock could be adversely affected.  The board’s abilitystock.

Our board of directors has the authority to fix and determine the termsrelative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our board of directors also has the authority to issue preferred stock and to cause its issuance, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult forwithout further stockholder approval. As a third party to acquire a majority ofresult, our outstanding voting stock.  Additional preferred shares issued by the board of directors could include voting rights, or even super voting rights, which could shiftauthorize the abilityissuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to controlholders the companypreferred right to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of the preferred stock.  These preferred shares could also have conversion rights into shares of common stock at a discountand the right to the market priceredemption of the common stock which could negatively affect the market for our common stock.  In addition, preferred shares, would have preference in the event of liquidation of the corporation, which means that the holders of preferred shares would be entitled to receive the net assets of the corporation distributed in liquidation before the common stock holders receive any distribution of the liquidated assets.


9


We have not paid, and do not intend to pay, dividends on our common shares and therefore, unless our common stock appreciates in value, our investors may not benefit from holding our common stock.

We have not paid any cash dividends since inception.  We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.  In addition, provisions in our Investment Agreementtogether with DMRJ Group restrict our ability to declare and pay dividends on common stock as long as we have outstanding obligations to DMRJ Group.  Nevertheless, if our common stock is not quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or listed on a senior exchange on or before July 13, 2011, and during any period we fail to maintain a quotation or listing for our common stock, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shares are entitled to quarterly dividends equal to 10% of our consolidated net income for each quarter commencing with the quarter beginning July 1, 2011.  In addition they are entitled to dividends or distributions madepremium, prior to the holders of our common stock to the same extent as if such holders of the Series A shares had converted their preferred shares into common stock. As a result, our common stock investors will not be able to benefit from owning our common stock unless a market for our common stock develops in the future and the market price of our common stock becomes greater than the price paid for the stock by these investors.

Any public trading market for our common stock which may develop in the future will likely be a volatile one and will generally result in higher spreads in stock prices.

If a public trading market for our common stock develops in the future, it would likely be in the over-the-counter market by means of the OTC Bulletin Board.  The over-the-counter market for securities has historically experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations during certain periods.  These broad market fluctuations and other factors, such as our ability to implement our business plan pertaining to the Gold Hill properties, as well as economic conditions and quarterly variations in our results of operations, may adversely affect the market priceredemption of our common stock. In addition, our board of directors could authorize the spreads onissuance of a series of preferred stock traded through the over-the-counter market are generally unregulated and higherthat has greater voting power than on the NASDAQ or other exchanges, which means that the difference between the price at which shares could be purchased by investors on the over-the-counter market compared to the price at which they could be subsequently sold would be greater than on these exchanges.  Significant spreads between the bid and asked prices of theour common stock could continue during any period in which a sufficient volume of trading is unavailable or if the stock is quoted by an insignificant number of market makers.  We cannot insure that our trading volume will be sufficient to significantly reduce this spread, or that we will have sufficient market makers to affect this spread.  These higher spreadsis convertible into our common stock, which could adversely affect investors who purchasedecrease the shares at the higher price at which the shares are sold, but subsequently sell the shares at the lower bid prices quoted by the brokers.  Unless the bid price for the stock increases and exceeds the price paid for the shares by the investor, plus brokerage commissions or charges, the investor could lose money on the sale.  For higher spreads such as those on over-the-counter stocks, this is likely a much greater percentage of the price of the stock than for exchange listed stocks.  There is no assurance that at the time the investor wishes to sell the shares, the bid price will have sufficiently increased to create a profit on the sale.

There may be conflicts of interest between our outside legal counsel who assisted us in preparation of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and our company because of the ownership of shares of our company by him.

The attorney who prepared the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part is also a shareholder which creates the potential for a conflict of interest in his representation of our company.  He owns 15,000 sharesrelative voting power of our common stock which represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares.  Conflicts of interest create the risk that he may have an incentive to act adversely to the interests of the company, especially where he would have a pecuniary interestor result in selling his shares in the future.  Further, our attorney’s pecuniary interest may at some point compromise his fiduciary dutydilution to our company, in which event he would likely resign and we would be required to retain new counsel.

10


Rule 144 will not be available for the outstanding shares acquired after 1995 for a period of at least one year after the original filing date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, which means that these shareholders may not be able to sell their shares in the open market during this period.

Rule 144, as recently amended, does not permit reliance upon this rule for the resale of shares sold after the issuer first became a shell company, until the issuer meets certain requirements, including cessation as a shell company, the filing of a registration statement, and the filing for a period of one year periodic reports required under the Exchange Act.  We estimate that approximately 1,416,074 of our outstanding shares, excluding the shares included for resale in this prospectus, were purchased after the company first became a shell company in 1995.  In addition, we believe all of the issued and outstanding shares of the selling stockholders in this prospectus were acquired after 1995, which means that these persons would not be able to sell their shares during this waiting period except pursuant to this prospectus.  If for any reason we withdraw this registration statement or fail to file our periodic reports, these persons may not be able to publicly resell their shares.

existing stockholders.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


The statements contained in this prospectusProspectus that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to, statements found in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” are forward-looking statements that represent management’s beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, need for financing, competitive position, potential growth opportunities, potential operating performance improvements, ability to retain and recruit personnel, the effects of competition, and the effects of future legislation or regulations. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the words “believes,” “intends,” “may,” “should,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “could,” “plans,” or comparable terminology or by discussions of strategy or trends. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot give any assurances that these expectations will prove to be correct. Such statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected results, and actual future results could differ materially from those described in such forward-looking statements.


Among the factors that could cause actual future results to differ materially are the risks and uncertainties discussed in this prospectus.Prospectus. While it is not possible to identify all factors, we continue to face many risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the following:

 ·environmental hazards;

 ·metallurgical and other processing problems;

 ·unusual or unexpected geological formations;

 ·need for additional funding to continue operations;
global economic and political conditions;

 ·staffing considerations in remote locations;

disruptions in credit and financial markets;

 ·global productive capacity;

 ·changes in product costing; and

 ·competitive technology positions and operating interruptions (including, but not limited to, labor disputes, leaks, fires, flooding, landslides, power outages, explosions, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, war and terrorist activities).

Mining operations are subject to a variety of existing laws and regulations relating to exploration, permitting procedures, safety precautions, property reclamation, employee health and safety, air and water quality standards, pollution and other environmental protection controls, all of which are subject to change and are becoming more stringent and costly to comply with. Should one or more of these risks materialize (or the consequences of such a development worsen), or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from those expected. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update publicly or revise such statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


The

These risk factors discussed in “Risk Factors” above could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.  There may also be other risks and uncertainties that we are unable to predict at this time or that we do not now expect to have a material adverse impact on our business.


USE OF PROCEEDS


We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stockShares by the selling stockholders.


11

Selling Stockholders.

MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK

Market Information

There is currently no public market for our common stock and it is not currently quoted or traded on any established public trading market.SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

This Prospectus relates to the possible resale by the Selling Stockholders named below of shares of the Company’s Common Stock. We intend to make application for quotation of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board promptly following the effective date ofare filing the registration statement of which this prospectusProspectus is a part.


At January 7, 2011, we had no options or warrants outstanding, but we did have outstanding promissory notes convertible into shares of our common stock.  These three-year notes in the principal aggregated amount of $600,000 were issued on November 30, 2009, and bear interest at 15% which is payable monthly.  The principal amount of these notes and interest are convertible into our common shares at any time through November 30, 2012, at the rate of $0.70 per share.  The principal on these notes is convertible into approximately 857,143 shares as of the maturity date of the notes.  If we failpart pursuant to repay the loans at maturity, we have agreed to issue additional shares to the lenders at the rate of one share for each $2.00 owed at maturity and the maturity date will be extended for one year.  We also have outstanding 958,033 shares of Series A Preferred stock which are convertible into 958,033 shares of common stock.

We have granted registration rights only to the selling stockholders herein.  We have not proposed to publicly offer any shares of our common stock in a primary offering.

Availability of Rule 144

Rule 144 was adopted by the SEC to provide shareholders a safe harbor which, if followed, would allow shareholders an opportunity to publicly resell restricted or control securities without registration.  However, Paragraph (i) of Rule 144 states that the provisions of the rule are not available forRegistration Rights Agreement we entered into with Clifton Mining Company. References in this Prospectus to the resale“Selling Stockholders” means Clifton Mining Company, Scott Moeller, Keith Moeller, and any donees, pledgees, transferees or other successors in interest selling shares received after the date of securities initially issued bythis Prospectus from a shell company,selling stockholder as a gift, pledge or a company which atother non-sale related transfer.

Each of the time of issuance had ever been a shell company, until certain conditions are met.  These conditions include the following: the issuer had ceasedSelling Stockholders, who is deemed to be a shell company;statutory underwriter, will offer its Shares at $0.40 or, upon quotation of our Common Stock on OTCQB, at prevailing market or privately negotiated prices if a market should develop.

We do not know how long the Selling Stockholders will hold the Shares before selling them, and other than the Registration Rights Agreement we entered into with it, is subject towe currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with the reporting requirementsSelling Stockholders regarding the sale of any of the Exchange Act;Shares. The Company will not receive any portion or percentage of any of the proceeds from the sale of the Shares.

The following table sets forth ownership of shares held by the Selling Stockholders.

  Before Offering     After Offering (2)
Name Number of
Shares
Owned
  Percent
of
Class (1)
  Shares
Offered
for Sale
  Number of
Shares
Owned
  Percent
of
Class (1)
               
Clifton Mining Company  5,810,824   22%  5,810,824   0  *
Keith Moeller  125,000   0%  125,000   0  *
Scott Moeller  125,000   0%  125,000   0  *

*Less than 1%.
(1)Based on 26,631,603 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the date of this Prospectus.
(2)The columns in the table above reflecting “After Offering”: “Number of Shares Owned” and “Percent of Class” are prepared on the basis that all shares being registered in this registration statement are resold to third parties.  

Of the total shares owned by Clifton Mining, 5,500,000 were issued on or about March 8, 2019, in connection with the Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated February 7, 2019, with this Selling Stockholder. These shares were issued as partial consideration for entering into the amended lease agreement. Of the remaining shares, 60,824 were issued in 2009 in connection with the transfer of a reclamation bond and 500,000 were issued in 2009 in connection with a joint venture transaction of which 250,000 of these shares were subsequently transferred in the amounts of 125,000 to Keith Moeller and 125,000 to Scott Moeller.

Clifton Mining Company is the owner and lessor of the mining claims upon which our principal mining operations are conducted. In addition, on March 26, 2019, we were granted an option to purchase 64 additional patented mining claims from Ben Julian, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, for $500,000. On June 13, 2019, we entered into a letter agreement with Clifton whereby it has filed all reportswould purchase 44 of the optioned claims and other materials required duringwe would acquire the last 12 months, orremaining 20 claims. Each party would pay one-half of the total purchase price for the claims. The purchase price was paid by each party and the closing of the acquisition occurred on June 14, 2019.

MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK

Market Information

At the date of this Prospectus, there is no public trading market for our Common Stock. We intend to apply for the quotation of our Common Stock on an automated quotation system. There can be no assurance that any application for the quotation of our Common Stock on an automated quotation system will be approved. If any such application is not approved and our common stock ultimately is not quoted on an automated quotation system, we intend to engage a shorter period it was requiredmarket maker to apply for quotation on the OTCQB Market operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the reports; it has filed “Form 10 information;” and one year has elapsed fromnecessary documents with the date the “Form 10 information” was filed.  We ceased principal operations in 1995 and became a shell company.  Although management does not believe we are currently a shell company, as a former shell company, our shareholdersFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA); nor can there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will not be able to rely on Rule 144 until at least one year from the filing date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, except for shareholders owning shares which were issued by us prior to the time we first became a shell company in 1995.  Management estimates that approximately 1,198,729 shares were issued prior to 1995 and would be eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144.


approved.

Holders


At January 7, 2011,December 31, 2019, we had approximately 605649 holders of our common stock.  The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies.Common Stock. We have appointed Over the CounterPacific Stock Transfer 231 East 2100 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84115,Company, Las Vegas, Nevada, to act as the transfer agent of our common stock.  We act as our own transfer agent for the Series A PreferredCommon Stock.


Dividends


We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock.Common Stock since inception. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to stockholders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our Prepaid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement prohibits us from declaring, making or paying any dividends so long as any gold remains to be delivered or any amounts remain to be paid by us under the agreement. In addition, any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant.


12


So long as we have any outstanding obligations to DMRJ Group under the provisions of our Investment Agreement, we are prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends, except on our Series A Preferred Stock.  In addition, we are prohibited from declaring a dividend on our common stock if at the time any dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock are unpaid.

The holders of the Series A shares are entitled to quarterly dividends equal to 10% of our consolidated net income for each quarter commencing with the quarter beginning July 1, 2011.  Nevertheless, if our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or listed on a senior exchange on or before July 13, 2011, and so long as the common stock continues to be so quoted or listed, no quarterly dividends will be payable or accrue.  In addition they are entitled to dividends or distributions made to the holders of our common stock to the same extent as if such holders of the Series A shares had converted their preferred shares into common stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth as of the most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, certain information with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our common stock is authorized for issuance:

  
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
  
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding             
options, warrants and
rights
(b)
  
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a) and
(b))
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders1
  -0-      2,413,333 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total  -0-   -0-   2,413,333 
1
As originally adopted, our 2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan authorized the granting of up to 15,000,000 shares, either as stock options or restricted stock grants.  As a result of a stock split effective April 30, 2009, the number of shares authorized under the plan was reduced to 1,250,000, and on February 28, 2010, the plan was amended to increase the number of shares authorized under the plan to 3,000,000, of which 586,667 had been issued as stock grants under the plan prior to December 31, 2010, leaving 2,413,333 shares available for future issuance under the plan.  No options had been granted under the plan as of December 31, 2010.

In July 2008 the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in August 2008.  The purpose of the plan is to provide eligible persons an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in our company and as an incentive to remain in our service.

In February 2010 we amended the plan to increase the number of shares available from 1,250,000 to 3,000,000 shares of common stock which are authorized for nonstatutory and incentive stock options and stock grants under the plan, which are subject to adjustment in the event of further stock splits, stock dividends, and other situations. So long as we have any outstanding obligations to DMRJ Group, we are restricted to granting options or issuing shares under the plan in excess of 1,100,000 shares, of which we have issued 586,667 shares as of January 7, 2011.

The plan is administered by the Board of Directors.  The persons eligible to participate in the plan are as follows: (a) employees of our company and any of its subsidiaries; (b) non-employee members of the board or non-employee members of the Board of Directors of any of its subsidiaries; and (c) consultants and other independent advisors who provide services to us or any of our subsidiaries.  Options may be granted, or shares issued, only to consultants or advisors who are natural persons and who provide bona fide services to us or one of our subsidiaries, provided that the services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for our securities.

13


The plan will continue in effect until all of the stock available for grant or issuance has been acquired through exercise of options or grants of shares, or until July 12, 2018, whichever is earlier.  The plan may also be terminated in the event of certain corporate transactions such as a merger or consolidation or the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Management’s Discussion and analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations analyzes the major elements of our balance sheets and statements of income.  This section

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statementsfinancial statements and accompanyingrelated notes and other detailed information includedthereto contained in this prospectus.

Prospectus.

Overview

Desert Hawk Gold Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated on November 5, 1957, in the State of Idaho as Lucky Joe Mining Company. In 2008 we changed our corporate domicile to the State of Nevada by merging with a wholly owned subsidiary formed solely for this purpose. Our Nevada corporation was incorporated on July 17, 2008. We have no subsidiaries.


Overview

We are a mineral exploration company with proposed projectscurrently engaged in the extraction of gold and related precious metals from our Kiewit mining property located in the Gold Hill Mining District in Tooele County, Utah.  We are currently focused on extracting mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims for processing at the Cactus Mill pilot plant, and completing the permitting process for our Kiewit claims and construction of a heap leach facility near these claims.  We are also in the process of seeking an amendment to our current mill site permit to allow us to construct and operate a heap leach facility near the pilot mill.  We propose to extract any copper, gold, and silver from the mineralized material and sell the concentrate in readily available markets.   We also intend to extract tungsten and to attempt to locate a market to sell any product extracted from the mineralized material.


We were originally incorporated in the State of Idaho on November 5, 1957.  For several years the company bought and sold mining leases and claims, but in 1995 we ceased all principal business operations.  In 2008 we changed the domicile of the company from the State of Idaho to the State of Nevada.  In May 2009 we raised funds to recommence mining activities.  In

DMRJ Settlement

On July 2009 we entered into agreements to commence exploration activities on mining claims in the Gold Hill Mining District located in Tooele County, Utah.  We hold leasehold interests within the Gold Hill Mining District consisting of 334 unpatented mining claims, including an unpatented mill site claim, 42 patented claims, and five Utah state mineral leases located on state trust lands, all covering approximately 33 square miles.  From these claims we have centered our activities on the Yellow Hammer project located on four of the patented claims, the Kiewit project consisting of seven of the unpatented Kiewit claims, and the Cactus Mill project consisting of an unpatented mill site.  We have no current exploration plans for the remaining claims.  We also hold eight unpatented lode mining claims in Yavapai County, Arizona, on which we have no current plans to conduct exploration.  We do not have any proven or probable reserves on any of our mineral claims or mining leases.


Currently, we have no source of revenue.  Previously we funded our exploration activities through the sale of our common stock in non-public offerings and loans from investors.  In July14, 2010, we entered into an investment agreementInvestment Agreement, which was amended from time to time, (the “Investment Agreement”) with DMRJ Group I, LLC through which we can borrow up(“DMRJ”) to $6,500,000provide funding for our Yellow Hammer and Kiewit projects.  Historically,mining operations. Under the terms of the Investment Agreement, we have incurred net losses forborrowed approximately $15,000,000 through the yearsyear ended December 31, 20092017 resulting in a balance due to DMRJ of $25,511,561 including principal and 2008, and have also incurred lossesinterest. As further consideration for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  Ifloans, we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from the extraction and processing of mineralized material from our Yellow Hammer claims, we will not be able to meet our obligations to repay the loan advancesissued to DMRJ Group and will likely lose our interest in all of our assets and mining claims.

Recent Material Developments

In approximately May 2009 we began raising funds and commenced exploration activities on our Utah claims.  Since that date and during the period covered by the financial statements included herein, we have accomplished the following material activities:

·In May 2009 we offered and sold 1,000,000 shares of our common stock in a non-public offering and raised $700,000 in gross proceeds to meet our cash obligations under the agreements by which we obtained the mining claims in the Gold Hill Mining District;

14


·In July 2009 we acquired the leasehold interests in our mining claims in the Gold Hill Mining District;

·In September 2009 we conducted another non-public offering of our common stock and sold 440,000 shares and raised gross proceeds of $308,000 to conduct a drilling program on our Yellow Hammer claims;

·Also in September 2009 we filed an amendment to our mill site permit to allow us to construct and operate a heap leach facility near the pilot plant on the Cactus Mill site;

·In fall 2009 we completed approximately 6,000 feet of drilling on the Yellow Hammer claims in this district;

·In November of 2009 we borrowed an aggregate of $600,000 from two investors for operating expenses and exploration work on our Yellow Hammer claims;

·In December 2009 we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Blue Fin Capital, Inc., a Utah corporation owning unpatented mining claims in Arizona;

·In February 2010 we made application to the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for a Large Mining Operations Permit to commence exploration activities on the Kiewit claims located in the district and construct and operate a heap leach facility near the claims; and

·Since May 2009 we retained the personnel to commence exploration activities on the Utah claims and commence the rebuild of the pilot mill.

Subsequent to the period covered by the financial statements included with this prospectus, we have accomplished the following material activities:

·In July 2010 we secured the funding from DMRJ Group for the proposed exploration activities;

·In September 2010 we completed the rebuild of the pilot mill on the Cactus Mill site and commenced the testing of the pilot mill; and

·
In October 2010 we completed the testing of the pilot mill and commenced processing mineralized material at the pilot plant; and
·Since July 1, 2010, we have retained the additional personnel to test and operate the pilot mill and extract the mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims.

DMRJ Group Funding

DMRJ Group has committed to loan us up to $6,500,000 under certain terms and conditions primarily for exploration activities on the Yellow Hammer and Kiewit claims.  These loans are secured by all of our assets, including our leasehold interests in our mining claims.  Each loan advance made by DMRJ Group is evidenced by a promissory note due not later than July 14, 2012.  As of December 7, 2010, we had requested and received four loan advances from DMRJ Group for $500,000 each for a total of $2,000,000, plus a total of $352,941, in prepaid interest paid to DMRJ Group.

Each advance amount bears interest of 15% per annum from the date of borrowing.  We are required to prepay interest on any advance that would accrue during the first year following the advance, or a shorter period if the advance is less than one year prior to the maturity date of the promissory note.  This prepayment of interest is nonrefundable even if we prepay the advance.  Following this one-year period interest on the advance is payable monthly until the advance is repaid in full.  In addition, at the time we repay or prepay the advance, we are required to pay an additional amount equal to 20% of the principal amount being repaid or prepaid.  Upon an event of default, the interest rate on the outstanding principal amount increases to 25%.

15


Loan advances made for our Yellow Hammer and Kiewit projects are subject to mandatory prepayments by us.  Yellow Hammer advances must be repaid, together with prepayment interest and any outstanding monthly interest, commencing on or before the fifth business day of the month following February 2011 and each month thereafter through September 2011.  Kiewit advances must be repaid, together with prepayment interest and any outstanding monthly interest, beginning month seven after the initial advance on this project through month twelve.

As additional consideration for DMRJ Group we issued 958,033 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, 180,000 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock, and 444,529.69 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. DMRJ owned approximately 77% of stock of the Company (on a fully diluted basis). The preferred shares and debt were subsequently transferred to affiliated entities of DMRJ.

In the third quarter of 2016, control of the management of DMRJ was given to court appointed trustees of the affiliated assignees of the debt and preferred shares, Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund L.P. (“PPVA”) and Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities Master Fund, LP (“PPCO”). On December 19, 2016, the SEC filed the complaint against defendants Platinum Management, PPCO, and management of DMRJ, charging the defendants with a complex, multi-pronged, fraudulent scheme to inflate returns to investors, and cover up massive losses and liquidity problems. In July 2011, a federal jury in the Eastern District of New York convicted two executives of Platinum Partners L.P., the parent of DMRJ, of securities fraud, securities fraud conspiracy and wire fraud conspiracy. One of the defendants convicted in the lawsuit, David Levy, served as a director of our company from 2015 through April 2016.

After 2016 neither DMRJ nor its affiliates were able to provide further funding and on February 13, 2018, we entered into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement with DMRJ, PPVA, and PPCO (the “Assumption Agreement”), whereby we agreed to repurchase the debt and preferred shares for payment of $625,000. The transaction closed on or about March 8, 2018. Upon closing DMRJ also released all security interest in the assets of the Company. Following closing of the Assumption Agreement, we cancelled all of the debt owed DMRJ. We also cancelled all of the preferred shares and terminated each of the series of preferred stock. Each of the parties to the lender.  These preferredAssumption Agreement also agreed to indemnify the other for breach of any representation or covenant made under the agreement.

Funding for the closing of the Assumption Agreement was furnished by Ibearhouse, LLC and West C Street, LLC, note holders and shareholders of the Company. Under the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2018 (the “SPA”), the Company exchanged 4,500,000 shares areof common stock to the convertible debt holders for $625,000 in cash and several concessions as to the convertibility, due dates and default provisions on their outstanding debt. Under the terms of the SPA these investors waived their rights to convert under prior 2009 promissory notes to eliminate any rights to convert the amounts due under the notes into shares of our common stock or to accelerate repayment upon default. These investors also agreed to amend their prior 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated October 14, 2016, in the principal amount of $125,000, their 10% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated November 15, 2016, in the principal amount of $25,000, and their 15% Convertible Promissory Note dated November 30, 2009, as amended, in the principal amount of $300,000. Each of these promissory notes was repaid in full on March 7, 2019.

Gold Sale Funding Transaction and Amended Agreement

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company entered into and closed a Pre-Paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with PDK Utah Holdings L.P. (“PDK”) for the sale and purchase by PDK of gold produced from the Company’s mining property. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, PDK agreed to purchase a total of 73,910 ounces of gold from the Company at a reduced market price. Prepayment will be made in three tranches, with the rateinitial tranche in the amount of one$11,200,000 having been made upon execution of the Purchase Agreement on or about March 7, 2019 (the “Initial Funding”), $4,500,000 for Tranche 2 to occur at least six months following the Initial Funding date, and $5,500,000 for Tranche 3 to occur at least 10 months following the Initial Funding date, provided that all conditions precedent for funding Tranches 2 and 3 are met. From the Initial Funding, the Company paid an upfront fee of $600,000 to PDK for expenses incurred in connection with the transaction. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to sell gold at a reduced market price in certain quantities during agreed periods following prepayment of each tranche. The first gold delivery of 655 ounces is due December 2020.


The Purchase Agreement contains provisions requiring the Company to pay PDK a portion of the proceeds when gold is sold to a third party. In addition, PDK may reduce the required number of ounces to be sold in exchange for common shareshares of the Company. As security for each preferred share converted,the obligations of the Company under the Purchase Agreement, the Company has granted PDK a security interest in all of the assets of the Company and has issued and recorded a Leasehold Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases, Rents, As Extracted Collateral and Contracts, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing. The Purchase Agreement contains representations and warranties, as well as affirmative and negative covenants customary to a transaction of this nature.

The forward gold sales contract liability due under the terms of the Purchase Agreement at September 30, 2019 is $10,600,000 which is the $11,200,000 received from PDK in the initial tranche less the $600,000 upfront fee paid by the Company. On October 31, 2019, the Purchase Agreement was amended to reduce the number of gold ounces to be delivered and the amount of funding to be received in Tranches 2 and 3.

On October 31, 2019, the Company and PDK amended the Purchase Agreement and entered into the Amended Pre-Paid Forward Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) to adjust the second and third tranches paid to the Company, to reduce the total number of ounces of gold subject to adjustmentthe Purchase Agreement, and to revise other provisions therein. The second tranche was reduced from $4,500,000 to $1,600,000, and the third tranche was reduced from $5,500,000 to $1,400,000. The second tranche was received on October 31, 2019 upon execution of the Amended Agreement and the third tranche was received on December 27, 2019, with funds to be dedicated in accordance with the revised budget furnished with the Amended Agreement. The amendment also reduced the total number of ounces of gold prepaid under the agreement from 73,910 to 47,045.

Under the terms of the Amended Agreement, the Company is obligated to deliver gold in the following quantities following prepayment of each tranche:

Beginning the 21st calendar month following the Initial Funding, 655 ounces of gold per month for each of the four calendar months thereafter, 670 ounces for each the 12 calendar months thereafter, 1,155 ounces for each of the 12 calendar months thereafter, and 1,512 ounces of gold for each of the 9 calendar months thereafter.

Beginning the 14th Calendar month following the Tranche 2 funding, 129 ounces of gold per month for each of the 37 calendar months thereafter.

Beginning the 13th Calendar month following the Tranche 3 funding, 112 ounces of gold per month for each of the 37 calendar months thereafter.

The Amended Agreement also alters the total amount that PDK may reduce the number of ounces of gold to be delivered under the Amended Agreement in exchange for common shares of the Company. Under the Amended Agreement, PDK may reduce the required number of ounces by up to 8,000 ounces in exchange for common shares of the Company.

Clifton Amended Lease Agreement

In March 2019, we, The Woodman Mining Company, and Clifton Mining Company (“Clifton”) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement (the “Amended Lease”). Under the terms of the Amended Lease, we relinquished our leasehold interest in all but 10 of the patented claims, on which we retained only the surface rights, and 66 of the unpatented lode mining claims previously held by us. The mining claims retained by us represent the area of interest known as the Kiewit property, which has been the principal focus of our mining activities. The lease term is for 20 years and for so long thereafter as the mining claims are being actively used by us for commercial mining purposes. The Cactus Mill Property was returned to Clifton as part of this agreement.


Under the terms of the Amended Lease, Clifton’s right to receive a 6% royalty interest from production on the Kiewit project was terminated. We also acquired from third parties and cancelled the remaining 1% outstanding royalty interest thereon, for which we paid each of the two parties $50,000.

As consideration for entering into the Amended Lease, Clifton received $3,000,000 and we issued 5,500,000 shares of our common stock with a fair value of $2,200,000. In addition, we and Clifton entered into a Registration Rights Agreement dated February 7, 2019, to register for resale the shares issued to Clifton which requires us to register the shares within 18 months following this agreement. In the event we issue commondo not register the shares within the 18-month period, we are obligated to pay Clifton a royalty equal to 2.5% of the net smelter returns from the minerals generated from our remaining mining claims. We have agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Rights Agreement for a period of three years. The Registration Rights Agreement contains mutual indemnification provisions.

Buyer Royalty Agreement

Concurrent with the Initial Funding of the Purchase Agreement, we granted the buyer a perpetual royalty equal to 4% of the net smelter returns payable on all minerals mined, produced, or instruments exercisable or convertibleotherwise recovered from our mining properties, for which the buyer paid $2,200,000.

H&H Metals Agreement

On March 29, 2018, we entered into commona five-year Agency Agreement (the “Agency Agreement”) with H&H Metals Corp., a New York corporation (“H&H”). Under the terms of the Agency Agreement H&H agreed to provide us certain advisory services in regard to natural resources activities and to assist us in securing purchasers for minerals produced from its mining properties.

On January 16, 2019, as a condition for entering into the Purchase Agreement (Note 3), we negotiated a termination of the Agency Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with H&H. Under the terms of the Termination Agreement, we paid H&H $600,000 in cash and agreed to pay an additional $200,000 within 18 months. We also issued 250,000 shares at a price less than $0.70 per share, or if we effect a reverse or forward split of our outstanding shares or a reclassification of our common stock.stock with a fair value of $100,000 to H&H. In addition, Phillip H. Holme, a principal of H&H, became a director of the Company. We recognized a loss on settlement of consulting contract of $900,000 during the quarter ended March 31, 2019.

Acquisition of Additional Mining Claims

On March 26, 2019, we negotiated an option to purchase 64 patented mining claims from Ben Julian, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, for $500,000. The claims are located contiguous to our loansexisting leased Kiewit claims, except for one claim located in the Dugway Mining District. On June 13, 2019, we entered into a letter agreement with Clifton whereby Clifton would purchase 44 of the optioned claims and we would acquire the remaining 20 claims. Each party would pay one-half of the total purchase price for the claims. The purchase price was paid by each party and the closing of the acquisition occurred on June 14, 2019. The Company received and has recorded a quitclaim deed for the 20 patented claims.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective February 23, 2018, the Board approved and adopted the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) pursuant to which 2,400,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were authorized. On February 23, 2018, the Board approved the grant of an aggregate principal amount of $600,000 have been subordinated2,400,000 options under the 2018 Plan exercisable at $0.40 per share which terminate February 23, 2023 in the amounts and to the debtfollowing:

Rick Havenstrite – 1,000,000 options;

Howard Crosby – 1,000,000 options;

John Ryan – 200,000 options; and

Linde Havenstrite – 200,000 options.

Historically, we incurred net losses for the year ended December 31, 2017. We incurred net income for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was attributable primarily to the gain on extinguishment of DMRJ Group.

debt. We incurred net losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

During the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, we had net losses of $350,348 and $91,772, respectively. This represents an increase in net loss of $258,576. The increase in net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2019 is principally attributable to increase in expense as the Company began production. The operating loss of $331,600 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the operating loss of $44,603 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 represents an increase loss of $286,997. The increased operating loss is due to an increase in General project costs, including amortization of mineral properties.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 20102019 and 2009


We generated no revenues2018.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, we had net income(loss) of $(3,133,826) and $22,524,399, respectively. This represents an increase in loss of $25,658,225 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 or 2009.  Total operating expenses increased approximately 424%, or $1,293,052,2019. The increase in net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,2018 is attributable to the cancellation in 2018 of our agreement with DMRJ whereby we agreed to repurchase the debt and preferred shares previously owned by them. A gain on extinguishment of $24,916,561 was recognized in 2018 as a result of this transaction. The operating loss of $2,084,421, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to the recommencementoperating loss of exploration activities beginning in May 2009, with no similar prior period activities, and is evidenced by the following items:


·Consulting expenses increased approximately 124%, or $88,092, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to consultants and contract labor for mill renovation and site preparation.

·Officer and directors fees increased approximately 793%, or $356,960, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to issuing stock to a new director for accepting appointment to the board and for their services as a director, and engaging Rick Havenstrite to work on the mine site and act as President.

·Exploration expense increased approximately 488%, or $310,581, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to becoming the operator of the mining properties under the agreements with Clifton Mining and the Moeller Family Trust.

·Legal and professional expenses increased approximately 245%, or $128,339, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to legal fees associated with the DMRJ Group funding and expenses related to our S-1 filing.

·General and administrative expenses increased approximately 546%, or $398,941, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to the overall increase in spending associated with becoming the operator of the mining properties under the agreements with Clifton Mining and the Moeller Family Trust.

·Depreciation expense was $10,139 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, with no comparable expense in the prior year.  This expense is attributable to the increase in property, plant and equipment associated with becoming the operator of the mining properties under the agreements with Clifton Mining and the Moeller Family Trust.

Other expense$1,818,394 for the nine month periodmonths ended September 30, 2010, was $883,598 compared to other income of $6,619 for the comparable prior year period.  This other expense is attributable to financing expense related to the DMRJ Group funding and interest expense related to convertible notes issued in November, 2009.
Management does not believe the percentage increases in expenses is indicative of future increases.  Until the company engages in exploration activities for a sufficient time to include comparable prior year periods, management is unable to predict the anticipated increases in expenses.
16


Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

We generated no revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009 or 2008.  Total operating expenses2018 represent an increased approximately 324%, or $407,405, for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to the recommencement of exploration activities beginning in May 2009, with no similar prior period activities, and is reflectedloss in the following items:

·Consulting expenses increased approximately 611%, or $77,841, for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to the hiring of consultants to assist the company in identifying business opportunities for the company resulting in the lease agreements signed during the year.

·Officer and directorsamount of $266,027. The increased loss is due to consulting fees increased approximately 32%, or $21,181, for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to engaging Rick Havenstrite to work on the mine site and act as President.

·Exploration expense was $120,324 for the year ended December 31, 2009, with no comparable expense in the prior year.  This expense is attributable to the recommencement of exploration activities on our Utah claims in 2009.  These activities consisted of geologist fees, equipment rental and assay costs.

·Legal and professional expenses increased approximately 291%, or $55,721, for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to expenses related to the preparation and audit of our financial statements and legal fees incurred in connection with our non-public stock and note offerings.

·General and administrative expenses increased approximately 448%, or $125,234, for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the comparable prior year period.  This increase was primarily attributable to the overall increase in spending associated with becoming the operator of the mining properties under the agreements with Clifton Mining and the Moeller Family Trust.

·Depreciation expense was $7,104 for the year ended December 31, 2009, with no comparable expense in the prior year.  This expense is attributable to  the increase in property, plant and equipment associated with becoming the operator of the mining properties under the joint venture agreements with Clifton Mining and the Moeller Family Trust

Other income was $14,998 for the year ended December 31, 2009, with no comparable other income in the prior year.  This increase in other income is attributable to a prior investment by the company.  Management does not anticipate that this increase would occur in the future.

Management does not believe the percentage increases in expenses is indicative of future increases.  Until the company engages in exploration activities for a sufficient time to include comparable prior year periods, management is unable to predict the anticipated increases in expenses.

Purchase Agreement.

Liquidity and Cash Flow


At September 30, 2010, our aggregate

Net cash and short-term investments totaled $429,590, which included $409,700 of cash and $19,890 of marketable securities.  Our cash balance is significantly lower than the $888,434 in cash at December 31, 2009.  The decrease is primarily attributable to the increased explorationused by operating activities on our Gold Hill Mining claims, including rebuilding of the pilot mill.


During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and forwas $5,634,221 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, our sole means2019, compared with cash used by operating activities of meeting our$629,918 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018. This $5,004,303 increase in the amount of cash flow requirementsused by operating activities is primarily attributable an increase in inventories and to the payment of accrued expenses and accounts payable. Cash flows from operations during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018 also included a noncash adjustment for stock based compensation of $456,000.

Net cash used by investing activities was through$1,758,849 during the salenine-month period ended September 30, 2019, compared to $38,676 cash used by investing activities during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018. This increase in cash used by investing activities of our common stock$1,720,173 represents an increase in property and loans from investors. In May 2008 we generated grossequipment purchases along with the royalty buy-outs as part of the Purchase Agreement.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $8,315,330 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019, compared with $671,567 cash provided by financing activities during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018. The increase of $7,643,763 in cash provided by financing activities during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 was due primarily to proceeds of $173,750 from the sale of stock; in May 2009 we generated gross proceeds of $700,000 from the sale of stock; and in our September 2009 offering we generated gross proceeds of $308,000 from the sale of stock.  In November of 2009 we borrowed $600,000 from two outside investors.  The net proceeds from these stock offerings and borrowings was used to satisfy our initial cash obligation of $250,000 to acquire the leasehold interests in our Utah mining claims, to conduct our drilling program on the Yellow Hammer claims, to conduct pre-exploration activities on the Utah claims such as assaying portionsPurchase Agreement.

As a result of the claims, conduction further geological work, and rebuilding the pilot mill, and to meet our overhead and administrative expenses.


17


In connection with the $600,000 borrowed from outside investors, we are required to pay monthly interest on the loans of $7,500.  The promissory notes evidencing the loans are due and payable on or before November 30, 2012.

Pursuant to our agreements under which we acquired our leasehold interests in the claims located in the Gold Hill Mining District, we are obligated beginning in 2010 to pay all fees and costs to maintain our interest in the patented and unpatented mining claims and state mineral leases.  For 2010, the maintenance fees for the unpatented claims were $46,760, which were paid in August 2010.  In addition, the property taxes on the patented claims were $6,024 for 2010 and fees on the state leases for 2010 were $6,890.  We anticipate that similar fees will be payable each year so long as we maintain our interest in the claims and leases.

In July 2010 we completed our funding agreement with DMRJ Group to provide up to $6,500,000 for exploration activities on our Yellow Hammer and certain of our Kiewit claims.  All loan advances for these projects made pursuant to this funding arrangement are due not later than July 14, 2012.

Yellow Hammer Project

The maximum amount allocable from the DMRJ Group funding for our Yellow Hammer project is $2,500,000 and is subject to meeting certain milestones on the project.  The last two advances of $500,000 each with respect to the Yellow Hammer project are conditioned upon our ability to commence the extraction of copper from the project, which we have achieved.  We have received loan advances of $2,000,000, plus $352,941 for prepayment of interest, for this project and anticipate making requests for an additional $500,000above, cash increased by $922,260 during the next six months.  Loan advances on this project are repayable pursuant to the following schedule:

Date 
Yellowhammer Advances
Repayment Amount
 
Feb-2011 $511,616 
Mar-2011 $1,011,616 
Apr-2011 $818,316 
May-2011 $795,704 
Jun-2011 $139,604 
Jul-2011 $139,604 
Aug-2011 $112,954 

We estimate that direct operating expenses on the Yellow Hammer project, including operationnine-month period ended September 30, 2019, leaving us with a cash balance of the pilot mill and extraction and crushing$930,976 as of the mineralized material for the pilot mill will be approximately $1,880,000 over the next eight-month period which commenced November 2010.  We also anticipate that the capital costs of constructing the heap leach facility near the pilot plant will be approximately $437,000 and will be subject to obtaining approval for the amendment to our existing operating permit.  We believe the cost of operating this facility for the first 12 months will be approximately $776,250.  Estimated operating costs of the pilot mill are based upon the experience of our management and our outside consultants and employees, as well as actual operating costs since commencing operations at the pilot mill in October 2010.  Projected capital costs for constructing the heap leach facility are based upon initial bids solicited by management from the anticipated sources of the materials necessary to construct the facility, which bids, however, are no longer binding upon these source companies but which management believes remain accurate.  Estimated operating costs of the heap leach facility are based upon the experience of management from like projects.  Management believes that the estimated costs associated with operating the pilot mill and constructing and operating the proposed heap leach facility are accurate within 10% of these estimates.  Nevertheless, we have no firm contracts for materials or labor associated with these estimates, which means that increases or decreases in the costs of labor or materials either because of material changes in the economy or mining industry or from delays in obtaining the necessary amendment to the existing large mining operations permit for this project could affect the accuracy of these estimates.
Funds from DMRJ Group will be insufficient to meet our cash flow projections for this project.  Our Cactus Mill pilot plant commenced operations in October 2010.  We anticipate that we will generate revenue from the operation of the pilot plant commencing first quarter 2011 sufficient to provide the additional cash flow requirements.  Nevertheless, if we are unable to generate revenue sufficient, if at all, to meet the operating expenses for the project and to meet the repayment schedule to DMRJ, we will likely be unable to continue our exploration activities on this project.  In addition, since all of our assets, including our leasehold interests in the claims is pledged as security on our obligation to DMRJ Group, if we fail to generate sufficient revenue to make the repayments, it is likely that we would lose all of our assets and our leasehold interest in all of our claims.  We have no other source of funding for this project and do not anticipate being able to secure an alternative funding source until at least July 14, 2012, following the scheduled repayment by us of all loan advances from DMRJ Group.

18


Kiewit Project

The maximum amount allocable from the DMRJ Group funding for our Kiewit project is $2,750,000 and is subject to meeting certain milestones on the project.  Advances for operations on the Kiewit project are conditioned upon our ability to obtain and maintain all environmental and mining permits necessary to commence mining activities and our timely payment of the initial Yellow Hammer advances for the month of February 2011.  We have not applied for any loan advances on this project, but we anticipate making requests for $2,750,000 during the first six months after these milestones are met.  Loan advances on this project are repayable pursuant to the following schedule:

The number of months following month in
which initial Kiewit Advance is Borrowed
 
Kiewit Advances 
Repayment Amount
 
Month 7 $825,934 
Month 8 $825,934 
Month 9 $825,934 
Month 10 $825,934 
Month 11 $578,618 

We estimate that the capital costs to construct the heap leach facility for the Kiewit project will be approximately $3,300,000 and that the direct operating expenses on the project, including operation of the heap leach facility and extraction and crushing of the mineralized material for the facility will be approximately $7,150,716 over the 12-month period beginning with the completion of the heap leach facility.  We cannot commence construction of this heap leach facility until we receive operating permits from the BLM and the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining, which we anticipate completing in approximately fourth quarter of 2010.  We anticipate that the heap leach facility will be completed in approximately six months from the date we receive the necessary permits.As with the Yellow Hammer project, funds from DMRJ Group will be insufficient to meet our cash flow projections for this project.  Prior to commencement of the construction of the facility, we anticipate generating sufficient revenue from operation of the Cactus Mill pilot plant to complete construction of the facility and to commence operations.We anticipate that we will generate revenue from the operation of the heap leach facility sufficient to provide the additional cash flow requirements for continuing operations.  Nevertheless, if we are unable to generate revenue sufficient, if at all, to meet the capital costs and the operating expenses for the project and to meet the repayment schedule to DMRJ, we will likely be unable to continue our exploration activities on this project.  In addition, since all of our assets, including our leasehold interests in the claims is pledged as security on our obligation to DMRJ Group, if we fail to generate sufficient revenue to make the repayments, it is likely that we would lose all of our assets and our leasehold interest in all of our claims.  We have no other source of funding for this project and do not anticipate being able to secure an alternative funding source until at least July 14, 2012, following scheduled repayment by us of all loan advances from DMRJ Group.

As such, our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of business.  However, the budgeted amounts described above from DMRJ Group are not sufficient to fund fully the completion of the heap leach facility near the pilot plant or operations over the next 12 months for the Yellow Hammer project.  Nor are the DMRJ funds sufficient to construct the heap leach facility and operate the Kiewit project.  In order to continue as a going concern beyond 2010 and in order to continue significant advancement of the Yellow Hammer and Kiewit projects pursuant to our long-term business strategy in 2011, we will need to generate revenues from the processing of the mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims at our pilot plant.  Without these revenues we would not have the resources to execute our long-term business strategy which may result in the loss of our assets, including the Yellow Hammer and the Kiewit projects.

September 30, 2019.

Critical Accounting Policies


The selection and application of accounting policies is an important process that has developed as our business activities have evolved and as the accounting rules have changed. Accounting rules generally do not involve a selection among alternatives, but involve an implementation and interpretation of existing rules, and the use of judgment, to the specific set of circumstances existing in our business. Discussed below are the accounting policies that we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue or expense being reported. See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in our Consolidated Financial Statementsattached financial statements for a discussion of those policies.


19


Revenue Recognition

Sales of gold concentrate sold directly to customers are recorded as revenues and receivables upon completion of the performance obligations and transfer of control of the product to the customer. For concentrate sales, the performance obligation is met, the transaction price can be reasonably estimated, and revenue is recognized generally at the time of shipment at estimated forward prices for the anticipated month of settlement. Due to the time elapsed from shipment to the customer and the final settlement with the customer, prices at which sales of the Company’s concentrates will be settled are estimated. Previously recorded sales and accounts receivable are adjusted to the estimated settlement metals prices until final settlement by the customer.

Sales and accounts receivable for concentrate shipments are recorded net of charges by the customer for treatment, refining, smelting losses, and other charges negotiated with the customers. Charges are estimated upon shipment of concentrates based on contractual terms, and actual charges typically do not vary materially from estimates.

Mineral Exploration and Development Costs


We account for mineral exploration costs in accordance with ASC 932Extractive ActivitiesTopic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.. All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred, previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period the property is abandoned. Expenditures to explore new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies of mineralized material, and to expand the capacity of operating mines, are capitalized and amortized on a units of productionunits-of-production basis over proven and probable reserves.


Inventories

Inventories consist of estimated gold on the heap leach pad and in the carbon process system and are valued at the lower of production cost or market value. Gold on the heap leach pad is estimated to be 80% complete for cost purposes and gold in the process system is estimated at 95% complete.

Mineral Properties


We account for mineral properties in accordance with ASC 930Extractive Activities-MiningTopic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.. Costs of acquiring mineral properties are capitalized by project area upon purchase of the associated claims. Mineral properties are periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value.


Reclamation and Remediation

Remediation, reclamation and mine closure costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. Management estimates costs associated with reclamation of mining properties as well as remediation costs for inactive properties. We use assumptions about future costs, capital costs and reclamation costs. Such assumptions are based on our current mining plan and the best available information for making such estimates.

For non-operating properties, we accrue costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when it is probable that such costs will be incurred and that they are reasonably estimable. Such costs are based on management’s estimate of amounts expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed.

Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents as well as various notes payable. All instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity and interest rates of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at September 30, 2019 and 2018.

Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, we had an accumulated deficit of $8,808,751 through September 30, 2019 which raises doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event we cannot continue in existence.

Although production has restarted in 2019, it has not yet reached optimum levels. The timing and amount of capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including demand for products, metals market pricing, and the availability of opportunities for expansion through affiliations and other business relationships. Although management has procured funding through a Pre-Paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement they intend to continue to seek new capital from equity securities issuances to provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth, and fully implement our business plan. However, with the funding received under the Purchase Agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we believe we have the ability to meet our obligations for the next twelve months.

If the going concern assumption were not appropriate for these financial statements, then adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values of the assets and liabilities, the reported revenues and expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, result of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.


BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES


Overview


Desert Hawk Gold Corp. is an exploration stage company, which means we are engaged in the search for mineral deposits or reserves which could be economically and legally extracted or produced.  None of our mining properties has any known reserves and our proposed programs(the “Company”) was incorporated on these properties are exploratory in nature.  We were originally incorporatedNovember 5, 1957, in the State of Idaho on November 5, 1957, under the name ofas Lucky Joe Mining Company. For several years the company bought and sold mining leases and claims, but in 1995 we ceased all principal business operations.  In 2001 control of the company was acquired by Robert E. Jorgensen, John Ryan, and Howard M. Crosby, who purchased a controlling number of shares and assumed management of the company for the purpose of reengaging in mining operations.  In January 2006 Mr. Jorgensen acquired sole control of the company from Messrs Ryan and Crosby.  In 2008 we changed theour corporate domicile of the company from the State of Idaho to the State of Nevada by merging the Idaho corporation intowith a newlywholly-owned subsidiary formed solely for this purpose. Our Nevada corporation which was incorporated on July 17, 2008. FollowingWe have no subsidiaries.

We are currently engaged in the changeextraction of domicile, on April 3, 2009, we changed the name of the company to Desert Hawk Gold Corp.


Effective April 3, 2009, we also reverse split the outstanding shares ofgold and related precious metals from our common stock at the rate of one share for each 12 shares outstanding (1:12).  Unless otherwise designated in this prospectus, all common stock amounts give effect to this reverse split.

In July 2009 we entered into joint venture agreements to commence exploration activities onKiewit mining claimsproperty located in the Gold Hill Mining District located in Tooele County, Utah.  We subsequently converted these joint venture agreements into lease agreements.

In December 2009

Mining Operations

On January 7, 2014, we acquired allreceived final approval from the federal Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) of the outstanding stock of Blue Fin Capital, Inc., a Utah corporation owning eight unpatented lode mining claimsKiewit Large Mine Permit which allowed us to develop the Kiewit deposit and put it into production. Development began in Arizona.  We issued a total of 2,713,636 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Blue Fin, which included 482,236 shares to Mr. Jorgensen, our CEO, 1,000,000 shares to Rick Havenstrite, our President, and 1,131,400 shares to Eric L. Moe, who became one of our directors subsequent to this transaction, all of whom were shareholders of Blue FinJune 2014. Construction at the timesite was funded by loan advances from DMRJ under the Investment Agreement. The first sale of minerals from the mine occurred in October 2014. We suspended operations in June 2016 because of depressed metal prices and lack of funds. We resumed operations in spring 2018 and again suspended operations in October 2018 for lack of funding. Since securing funding in March 2019, we have recommenced mining operations.

Distribution, Sales, and Raw Materials

We currently sell our products solely to Asahi. We use several raw materials such as cyanide, caustic, and limestone, in processing and we are not dependent upon any single supplier for our raw materials. We also currently are dependent upon one customer for our product although other customers are available.

Competition

The precious metal exploration and mining industry is highly fragmented. We expect to compete with many other exploration companies looking for gold, silver and other minerals. We are among the smallest of the acquisition.  The closing ofexploration companies in existence and are a very small participant in the transaction occurred on December 31, 2009, and Blue Fin became a wholly owned subsidiary of Desert Hawk.  The transaction was approved by a majority of the disinterested directors who determined thatprecious metal industry. However, we generally expect to compete favorably with other exploration companies since the claims would have value to the company at least equal to the par value at the time of the shares issued.  We have been unable to secure funding for exploration of these properties and do not consider these properties material at present because of the inability to raise funds for further exploration, but we plan to commence exploration activities on these claims after completion of our current activities on the Gold Hill projects.  Blue Fin Capital, Inc. is our sole subsidiary.


20


From 2008 through 2010 we funded our operations through the sale of our common stock and promissory notes.  In May 2008 we conducted a non-public offering of shares of our common stock.  We sold 289,584 shares and raised $173,750 in gross proceeds to recommence mining operations.  In May 2009 we offered and sold 1,000,000 shares of our common stock in a non-public offering and raised $700,000 in gross proceeds to meet our cash obligations under the joint venture agreements with Clifton Mining and Moeller Family Trust described below and to commence exploration operations on the property.  In September 2009 we conducted another non-public offering of our common stock.  We sold 440,000 shares and raised gross proceeds of $308,000 in the offering to conduct a drilling program on our mining properties.  In November of 2009 we borrowed $600,000 from two investors and issued 15% convertible promissory notes for this principal amount.  The promissory notes mature on November 30, 2012, and are convertible at $0.70 per share.  In the event we fail to repay one of these notes, or interest thereon, in full on the maturity date of the note, we have agreed to issue an additional one share of our common stock for each $2.00 of the original principal amount of the note at the maturity date and the maturity date of the Note will be extended for one year.

In July 2010, as described in more detail below, we entered into a financing arrangement with DMRJ Group I, LLC to provide up to $6,500,000 in funding for our Gold Hill mining properties.

Acquisition of Utah Mining Claims and Leases

Clifton Mining Company and Woodman Mining Company Lease Agreement

On July 24, 2009, we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the Clifton Mining Company and Woodman Mining Company under which Clifton Mining granted toheld by us exclusive possession of certain patented and unpatented mining claims and an unpatented mill site claim and certain Utah state mineral leases covering lands in the Gold Hill Mining District located in Tooele County, Utah, forconsolidate the principal mining areas and limit the ability of other exploration development and mining, and the rightcompanies to occupy the properties and to explore, develop and mine the properties for minerals.  Woodman Mining also granted us the same rights in certain of these patented mining claims owned jointly with Clifton Mining.  These combined interests included 419 unpatented load and placer mining claims, including an unpatented mill site claim, 38 patented claims, and seven Utah state mineral leases located on state trust lands.  Under the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement, we paid $250,000 to Clifton Mining on or about July 15, 2009.  Additionally, we issued 500,000 shares of our common stock to Clifton Mining for the rights on the Kiewit gold property includedcommence material exploration activities in the Joint Venture Agreement.  These sharesdistrict. Furthermore, if we are able to successfully recover gold, as well as silver and other by-products from our claims, it is likely that we will be able to sell all minerals that we are able to recover.

Government Compliance

Our operations are subject to a six-year lockupextensive federal and leak-out agreement which prevents Clifton Mining from selling shares publicly for a period of one year fromstate laws and regulations designed to conserve and prevent the original filing datedegradation of the registration statementenvironment. These laws and regulations require obtaining various permits before undertaking certain exploration or mining activities and may result in significant delays, substantial costs and the alteration of which this prospectus is a part.  Thereafter, Clifton Mining may sell upproposed operating plans. We believe we have all necessary environmental permits and authorizations to 20%support existing operations.

Some of these shares during any 12-month period.


In June 2010 the parties to the Joint Venture Agreement entered into an Amended and Restated Lease and Sublease Agreement effective as of the date of the original Joint Venture Agreement.  The Amended and Restated Lease and Sublease Agreement restated and replaced the original Joint Venture Agreement.  The amended agreement provides for the lease to us of the patented andour mining claims are unpatented claims includinglocated on federal land, which also requires compliance with applicable requirements administered by the mill site,BLM. These regulations impose specific conditions on the nature and extent of surface disturbance, the subleasemanner in which exploration and mining can be conducted, the disposition of the state mineral leases.  The amended agreement also grants to us the right to enter onto the land to conduct our exploration activities, the right to make reasonable use of the surface of the properties for these activities, the right to transport on and across the surface of the properties anyspent mineralized material, the use and the right to destroy so muchcontainment of the surfacechemical leaching agents and subsurface as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of the agreement.  The term of the amended agreement is for 20 years from its effective dateother solutions, spill prevention, liquid and for so long as we continue to produce and sell mineralized material or mineral resources from the property, unless sooner terminated as provided in the amended agreement.  We do not have the right to assign, sublease or otherwise transfer our interest in the amended agreement without the prior written consent of Clifton Mining as to those of the properties owned by it and without the prior written consent of Woodman Mining as to those of the properties owned by it.  Nevertheless we may mortgage or pledge our leasehold interest in the Kiewit Claims and the Cactus Mill Property for purposes of financing exploration, development and mining operations, but we cannot otherwise encumber the property without the written consent of Clifton Mining.

21

Under the terms of the amended agreement, we are obligated to pay a 4% net smelter royalty on base metals in all areas except for extraction of mineralized material from the Kiewit gold propertysolid waste disposition, ground water monitoring, and a net smelter royalty on goldnumber of other matters which if violated could result in fines, penalties, shutdowns and silver, except for extraction of mineralized material from the Kiewit gold property, based on a sliding scale of between 2% and 15% based on the price of gold or silver, as applicable.  attendant adverse publicity.

We are also obligated to pay a 6% net smelter return on any mineralized material extracted from the Kiewit gold property.  Beginning with 2010, we are required to make all property payments by submitting payment on or before July 15th of each year during the term of the agreement.  If we do not place the Kiewit property, the Clifton Shears-Smelter Tunnel property, and the Cane Springs property into commercial production within a three year period from the date of the agreement, we will be required to make annual payments to Clifton Mining of $50,000 to retain our rights to those properties.  The amended agreement also requires Clifton Mining to make available to us for our use all historical geological, engineering, and other data on the properties, as well as all buildings, equipment, existing permits, and water rights necessary for operations.  Clifton Mining has the right to terminate the Amended and Restated Lease and Sublease Agreement only if we fail to comply with the terms of the agreement and we fail to correct any breach of the agreement after 30 days’ notice from Clifton Mining.


We may surrender the lease as to all or any part of the leased property, after proper reclamation of all portions of the land to be surrendered affected by our operations.  The lease also provides that the lessors, Clifton Mining and Woodman Mining, will be responsible for any and all liability that may exist under certain encumbrances and will indemnify us and our affiliates, officers, directors, employees, shareholders and agents from and against loss of leasehold title or other actual losses that we may incur on account of the existence or enforcement of any rights under these potential encumbrances.

Prior to July 1, 2010, we notified Clifton Mining that we would surrender certain of the mining claims and leases originally obtained in our lease agreement with it.   For 2010 we paid the annual maintenance fees on 334 of the original 419 unpatented mining claims which were the subject of the original lease.  We determined that 112 of the original unpatented claims and two of the state leases would not fit within our overall plan for the district and these claims and leases reverted back to Clifton Mining.

In September 2009, we acquired all of the rights and interest of Clifton Mining in a $38,000 reclamation contract and a $3,777 cash surety deposit with the State of Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for certain of the property covered by the Amended and Restated Lease and Sublease Agreement.  As consideration for Clifton Mining selling us its interest in the reclamation contract and surety deposit, we issued 60,824 shares of our common stock to Clifton Mining.  For a period of two years from the original date of the transaction, we have the right to repurchase the shares for $48,000, or during the 180-day period after this two year period, Clifton Mining will have the option to put the shares to us for $48,000.

Moeller Family Trust Lease Agreement

Also on July 24, 2009, we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the Jeneane C. Moeller Family Trust under which the trust granted to us exclusive possession of four patented mining claims covering lands in the Gold Hill Mining District located in Tooele County, Utah, for exploration, development and mining, and the right to occupy the properties and to explore, develop and mine the properties for minerals.  These properties are known as the Yellow Hammer claims.  Under the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement, we issued 250,000 shares of our common stock for the rights granted to us in the Joint Venture Agreement.  These shares are subject to a six-year lockup and leak-out agreement which prevents the trust from selling shares publicly for a period of one year from the original filing date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.    Thereafter, the trust may sell up to 20% of these shares during any 12-month period.

In June 2010 the parties to this Joint Venture Agreement entered into an Amended and Restated Lease Agreement effective as of the date of the original Joint Venture Agreement.  The Amended and Restated Lease Agreement restated and replaced the original Joint Venture Agreement.  The amended agreement provides for the lease to us of the patented Yellow Hammer claims.  The amended agreement also grants to us the right to enter onto the land to conduct our exploration activities, the right to make reasonable use of the surface of the properties for these activities, the right to transport on and across the surface of the properties any mineralized material, and the right to destroy so much of the surface and subsurface as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of the agreement.  The term of the amended agreement is for 20 years from its effective date and for so long as we continue to produce and sell mineralized material or mineral resources from the property, unless sooner terminated as provided in the amended agreement.  We do not have the right to assign, sublease or otherwise transfer our interest in the amended agreement without the prior written consent of the trust.  Nevertheless we may mortgage or pledge our leasehold interest in the Yellow Hammer claims for purposes of financing exploration, development and mining operations, but we cannot otherwise encumber the property without the written consent of the trust.

22


Under the terms of the amended agreement, we are required to pay a 6% net smelter royalty on base metals and a net smelter royalty on gold and silver based on a sliding scale of between 2% and 15% based on the price of gold or silver, as applicable.  Beginning with 2010, we are required to make all property payments.  If we do not place the property into commercial production within a three year period from the date of the original agreement, we will be required to make annual payments to the trustBLM for each of $50,000our unpatented mining claims on federal land and to retainrecord an affidavit in the Tooele County Recorder’s Office reflecting the payment of the annual maintenance fees to the BLM and stating our rightsintention to those properties.hold the claims. The amended agreementmost recent annual maintenance fees paid to the BLM on our unpatented claims were $10,890 and this amount was paid in full within the required payment period. The required affidavit was also requires the trust to make available to us for our use all historical geological, engineering, and other data on the properties.  The trust has the right to terminate the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement only if we fail to complyfiled with the termsTooele County Recorder. Proposals repeatedly have been introduced in Congress that would substantially modify the Mining Law of 1872, the agreementstatute pursuant to which unpatented mining claims are located and we failmaintained. Bills have been introduced, but have not passed, that would require, among other things, the payment of production royalties to correct any breach of the agreement after 30 days’ notice fromUnited States. Personal property taxes levied by the trust.

state and collected by the local county are due each year and have been paid for the most recent tax year and for prior tax years.

Mining and exploration operations are also subject to both federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to employee health and safety. We may surrender the lease asemploy a mine safety administrator to all or any part of the leased property, after proper reclamation of all portions of the land to be surrendered affected bymonitor our operations.  The lease also provides that the lessor, the Moeller Family Trust, will be responsible for any and all liability that may exist under certain encumbrances and will indemnify us and our affiliates, officers, directors, employees, shareholders and agents from and against loss of leasehold title or other actual losses that we may incur on account of the existence or enforcement of any rightsobligations under these potential encumbrances.

laws and regulations.


DMRJ Group Investment Agreement

On July 14, 2010, we entered into an Investment Agreement with DMRJ Group I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.   Under

Intellectual Property Rights

We own the terms of the agreement, DMRJ Group has committed to loan us up to $6,500,000 under certain termsMarks “DESERT HAWK” and conditions.  Each loan advance made by DMRJ Group is evidenced by a promissory note due not later than July 14, 2012.  These loan advances can only be used by us to pay transaction fees“DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP” and expenses incurredalso own corresponding federal trademark filing Serial Nos. 85/232,815, 85,232,819, 85/232,820, and 85/232,823, for use in connection with mining extraction, consulting in the loan transaction, to purchase certainfields of mining and milling, milling of ore, mining exploration and mineral exploration, copper ore, gold ore, silver ore, and tungsten ore.

Employees

At December 31, 2019, we had 42 full-time and one part-time employees, including our President, Rick Havenstrite, who devotes approximately 90% of his time or 50 hours per week for this business. We also engage Marianne Havenstrite, wife of Rick Havenstrite, as our Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer. Our officers are based out of our Reno, Nevada office, along with other office and engineering personnel. The remaining employees work at our Gold Hill project site.

Offices and Other Facilities

Our corporate office is located in Reno, Nevada and Mr. Havenstrite, our President, operates from this office and also works on site at our mining property in Tooele County, Utah. Monthly rent for the office space in Reno is $1,000. Financial and engineering activities are performed in this office and rent includes use of the business equipment and as working capitalsupplies needed to advance our Yellow Hammerperform these functions. This office space is used primarily for RMH Overhead, LLC and Kiewit mining activities.  The maximum amounts allocable to our Yellow HammerOverhead Door Co. of Sierra Nevada/Reno, Inc., businesses owned by Mr. Havenstrite. Agreements for the use of the office space facilities with these parties are month-to-month and Kiewit projects are $2,500,000 and $2,750,000, respectively, and are subject to meeting certain milestonescan be cancelled at any time.

We rent a drill core-logging facility located on the projects.Tooele County airport grounds in Wendover, Utah. The balancefacility includes a separate core splitting and sawing room, field supply storage rooms and sufficient floor space for logging tables and racks to hold over 21,000 feet of the funds borrowed from DMRJ Group may be usedHQ core boxes. Monthly rent for capital and operating expenses.  The last two advances of $500,000 each with respect to the Yellow Hammer project are conditioned upon our ability to commence the extraction of copper from the project, which condition we have met.  Advances for operations on the Kiewit project are conditioned upon our ability to obtain and maintain all environmental and mining permits necessary to commence mining activities and our timely payment of the initial Yellow Hammer advances for the month of February 2011.  As of December 7, 2010, we had requested and received four loan advances from DMRJ Group for $500,000 each for an aggregate of $2,000,000, plus an aggregate of $352,941 in prepaid interest paid to DMRJ Group.

In November 2010 we amended the Investment Agreement to eliminate the requirement to produce 400,000 pounds of copper concentrate in order to receive the final two loan advances for the Yellow Hammer project or to avoid an event of default if this amount was not produced by mid-December 2010, and we revised the pro forma projections for the Yellow Hammer project.  At the time we entered into the original Investment Agreement in July 2010, we anticipated that the amendment to our mining permit which would authorize us to construct and operate the Cactus Mill heap leach facility would have been approved in third quarter 2010, and our projections for funding were based on this assumption.  Since the amendment to the mining permit has not been approved, we negotiated an amendment to the Investment Agreement to eliminate the requirement to produce 400,000 pounds of concentrate, which was based upon the original assumption of a combined operation of production of mineralized material from the pilot mill and from the heap leach facility.  Also, our projections furnished with the original Investment Agreement contained the projected mineral production levels, cash flows, operating expenses and debt service based upon the combined processing capabilities from the pilot millspace is $350 and the heap leach facility.  While we maintained the debt service payments of the original projections commencingrental arrangement is terminable at any time.

MINING PROPERTIES

Kiewit Project, Utah

The Kiewit gold property located in February 2011, we revised the mineral production levels, cash flows, and operating expenses based solely on the estimated mineralized material to be processed at the pilot mill.  The amendment was entered into on November 8, 2010.

Each advance amount bears interest of 15% per annum from the date of borrowing.  We are required to prepay interest on any advance that would accrue during the first year following the advance, or a shorter period if the advance is less than one year prior to the maturity date of the promissory note.  This prepayment of interest is nonrefundable even if we prepay the advance.  Following this one-year period interest on the advance is payable monthly until the advance is repaid in full.  In addition, at the time we repay or prepay the advance, we are required to pay an additional amount equal to 20% of the principal amount being repaid or prepaid.  Upon an event of default, the interest rate on the outstanding principal amount increases to 25%.

Loan advances made for our Yellow Hammer and Kiewit projects are subject to mandatory prepayments by us.  Yellow Hammer advances must be repaid, together with prepayment interest and any outstanding monthly interest, commencing on or before the fifth business day of the month following February 2011 and each month thereafter through September 2011.  Kiewit advances must be repaid, together with prepayment interest and any outstanding monthly interest, beginning month seven after the initial advance on this project through month twelve.
The Investment Agreement contains certain affirmative covenants we are required to meet in order to avoid an event of default under the agreement, including the following:
·Maintain the existence of our business and properties;
·Keep our properties insured;
·Pay and discharge promptly all material taxes;
·Furnish copies of our annual and quarterly financial statements;
·Furnish notice of any event of default under the agreement or the commencement or threat of any litigation;
·Comply with all rules and regulations applicable to our properties, including our mining claims and leases;
·Maintain proper books and records, including financial records;
·Use the proceeds of the loan advances for the purposes described in the agreement;
·Comply with all environmental laws applicable to our mining operations; and
·Keep all mining claims and leases in full force and effect.
The Investment Agreement further contains certain negative covenants which prohibit us from the following actions or activities:
·Incurring any indebtedness except in limited circumstances;
·Creating any significant liens on any of our properties or assets;
·Enter into any sale and lease-back transaction involving any of our properties;
·Make any investments in or loans or advances to other parties;
·Engage in any merger, consolidation, sale of assets or acquisition transaction, except for the purchase or sale of inventory or certain limited investments;
·Declare or pay any dividends, except for dividends to DMRJ Group;
·Engage in any business transactions with affiliates;
·Make capital expenditures except as permitted in the agreement pertaining to our current mining business;
·Create any lease obligations;
·Amend, supplement or modify any existing indebtedness;
·Enter into any swap, forward, future or derivative transaction;
·Make any change in our accounting policies or reporting practices;
·Form additional subsidiaries; or
·Modify or grant a waiver or release under or terminate any principal lease agreement or other material contract.
23

An event of default will occur under the terms of the Investment Agreement if any representation or warranty made by us in the transaction documents with DMRJ Group proves to be false or misleading in any material respect, if we fail to make required payments under the loan documents, if we fail to observe the covenants made in the agreement, if a change of control occurs, if a voluntary or involuntary insolvency action is commenced, or if a change of control of our company occurs.  In the case of an event of default, DMRJ Group may, upon prior written notice, terminate or suspend its commitment for further loan advances, declare the outstanding loan advances to be immediately due and payable, or exercise any other remedies legally available.
Pursuant to a Security Agreement dated July 14, 2010, we have secured the repayment of any advances made by DMRJ Group with all of our assets, including our shares of Blue Fin Capital, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, which shares have been pledged as collateral for the advances pursuant to a Pledge Agreement dated July 14, 2010.  As the secured party, DMRJ Group is appointed as attorney in fact to foreclose on and deal with our assets in the event of default.
As additional consideration for DMRJ Group entering into the Investment Agreement with us, we issued 958,033 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to the lender and entered into a Registration Rights Agreement dated July 14, 2010, to register, either upon demand or by piggyback, the resale of the common shares issuable upon conversion of the preferred stock.  These preferred shares are convertible into shares of our common stock at the rate of one common share for each preferred share converted, subject to adjustment in the event we issue common shares or instruments exercisable or convertible into common shares at a price less than $0.70 per share, or if we effect a reverse or forward split of our outstanding shares or a reclassification of our common stock.

In connection with the loan transaction, two of our prior lenders, West C Street LLC and Ibearhouse LLC, each of whom had loaned $300,000 to us in 2009, agreed to subordinate their debt to DMRJ Group.  In consideration for their agreement to subordinate their loans, we reduced the conversion price of the loans from $1.50 to $0.70 per share.  On July 14, 2010, we issued amended and restated promissory notes to West C Street and Ibearhouse reflecting the reduced conversion price and acknowledging the subordination to the DMRJ Group financing.

Gold Hill Projects

Overview

We hold leasehold interests within the Gold Hill Mining District in Tooele County, Utah, consisting of 334 unpatentedis our principal mineral property and is an exploration stage property. In June 2019 we also acquired 20 patented mining claims of which 302 are lode claims and 32 are placer claims, and including an unpatented mill site claim, 42 patented claims, and five Utah state mineral leases located on state trust lands, all covering approximately 33 square miles.  We intendcontiguous to concentrate our activities on our material claims, designated as the Yellow Hammer project located on four of the patented claims, the Kiewit project consisting of seven of the unpatented Kiewit claims, and the Cactus Mill project consisting of an unpatented mill site.property. We have assembled all of our claims and leases in this districtnot determined to create a sizeable, contiguous property package on whichwhat extent we will develop these new claims. We were attracted to conduct regional-scale exploration.  Therefore, we intend to maintain our leasehold interest in the remaining mining claims for future exploration, if warranted.  Over the next 12 months we intend to extract mineralized material on the Yellow Hammer lode claims and process the material at the Cactus Mill pilot plant, expand our permitted activities at the Cactus Mill property to include a heap leach facility to process material from the Yellow Hammer claims, commence extraction of mineralized material from the Kiewit lode claims and construct and operate a heap leach facility nearby to process the material from the Kiewit claims.

The first phase of our activities has included the re-habilitation and redesign of the existing mills on the Cactus Mill site to create a pilot plant facility.  The rebuilt pilot mill has been completed and testing was completed in fall of 2010.  In October 2010 we commenced processing mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims commencing in fourth quarter 2010.  Originally a smaller mill operated on this site over several decades.  A larger mill was built many years ago but required modification to accommodate the Yellow Hammer material.  The second phase will include the leaching of oxidized copper material at the existing Cactus Mill site.  We propose constructing a four acre plastic lined leach pad along with a one acre solution pond.  Material will be leached with diluted sulfuric acid and copper will be recovered through proven copper cementation methods.  The final phase of our current operating plan will include construction of an 800,000 square foot heap leach pad and process facility to accommodate disseminated gold material from the Kiewit project.  The construction of the two heap leach facilities and the proposed extraction activities on the Kiewit claims will require additional permits which we are in the process of securing from the appropriate governmental agencies.

We do not have any current plans to conduct material exploration activities on the remaining Utah claims or the mining properties in Arizona until and unless we are able to generate revenue from planned activities on our designated Utah claims.  At this time we do not consider these additional claims to be material to our current operating plan.  Nevertheless, if our extraction and processing activities on the Yellow Hammer Claims prove successful, we intend to proceed with the completion of a final feasibility study on all of the claims in the Gold Hill District.  We anticipate that this would include detailed surface mapping,Mining District because of its similarities to productive mining districts and sampling and diamond drilling of specified areas.  We are unable to predict the costs associated with completing a final feasibility study.

24


We have no proven or probable reserves for this project.  Management has decided rather than allocating funds and resources on a final feasibility study and developing proven or probable reserves, we intend to process mineralized material based on existing data supplemented with our own confirming work.  To this end, we commencedits past positive exploration activities on the Yellow Hammer claims in the summer of 2009 to confirm work done by numerous previous operators.  Approximately 6,000 feet of drilling was completed.  Samples were prepared and assayed at an independent laboratory in Reno, Nevada.  Composites were made of drill cuttings in several key areas and re-analyzed forresults. The gold silver, copper, tungsten, and other elements.  Metallurgical work is ongoing at an independent laboratory in Reno, Nevada, and by us on site.  In October 2010 we commenced processing mineralized material at the Cactus Mill pilot plant.  Initial results to date from the operationpotential of the pilot plant indicateGold Hill Mining District is enhanced by similarities to surrounding gold deposits. We believe the projections originally used on recoveriesscale, number and reagent consumptions confirm thatfrequency of the prior data is accurate Gold Hill Mining District gold-bearing exposures and we intendgeochemical anomalies compare favorably to proceed with our planned extractionsimilar attributes of other productive mining districts. 

Location, Infrastructure, and processing activities.


Project Location and Access

Geography of Kiewit

The Gold Hill Mining District is in Tooele County, Utah, located in the Gold Hill and the Clifton 7½ minute quadrangles in western Utah.at 40º 07’ 00” North latitude, 113º 49’ 40” West longitude. The Gold Hill Mining Districtdistrict includes the north end of the Deep Creek Mountains, one of the nearly north-south ranges that are common in the Great Basin. On the east and north, the mountain area is separated by gravel slopes from the flat plain of the Great Salt Lake Desert, and on the west, it is bounded by the Deep Creek Valley and groups of irregular low hills. It is approximately 190 miles west-southwest of Salt Lake City, Utah, and approximately 56 miles south southeast of Wendover, Utah. The project is reached by taking Alternate 93A south from Wendover approximately 28 miles and turning east on to the Ibapah Highway, a paved two lanetwo-lane road. Approximately 17 miles east is a maintained two lanetwo-lane county road which provides access to the property approximately 11 miles southeast to the townsmall settlement of Gold Hill, Utah. Each of the claimsThe Kiewit mine and the mill site are accessible by dirt roads maintained year-round by us and Tooele County.year-round. Access to the property is maintained all yearyear.

Power is supplied by the Company’s diesel generators and we likewise intendwater for mining operations is supplied from an existing groundwater well. Drinking water is trucked to maintain roadwaysthe site using a local vendor.


We expect to increase the number of employees by an additional 10-15 persons by the end of 2020. All employees are assigned to work at the Kiewit site, with the exception of the officers and one engineer, who work from the corporate office in Reno, NV, with periodic site visits.

The Gold Hill area lies within the region of the interior drainage that includes western Utah and most of Nevada, and, like the remaining portions of that area, is a high desert semi-arid climate. The area is composed of a highly dissected group of hills of relatively low relief. The elevation of the Kiewit Mine is approximately 5,500 feet. The Gold Hill area is bounded on the east by the Great Salt Lake Desert at an altitude of about 4,300 feet, on the north by Dutch Mountain with a higher elevation of 7,735 feet, on the west by Clifton Flat at an approximate elevation of 6,600 feet, and on the south by Montezuma Peak with an elevation of 7,369 feet.

Pronounced differences in temperatures between night and day are common, with the dryness of the air mitigating the high temperatures which predominate the summer days. Annual precipitation averages approximately 12 inches with about half falling in the months from February to May. Rainfall during summer to early fall is commonly in the form of severe thunderstorms. Snow may be expected between October and May. Fieldwork in the area is generally permitted throughout most of the year.

The higher portions of the Deep Creek Range and small areas near the summits of the adjoining mountains support a fairly heavy growth of yellow pine. The lower slopes of these mountains have a sparse covering of juniper and piñon trees. On the lower hills and on the gravel slopes surrounding them, these trees give way to sagebrush. The floor of the Great Salt Lake Desert in the north-east corner of the district is almost completely barren of vegetation.

Kiewit Mining Claims

The Kiewit mining claims consist of 66 unpatented and 10 patented mining claims, some of which are restricted to surface use only, covering approximately 18.3 square miles located in the Gold Hill Mining District in Tooele County, Utah.

The Kiewit mining claims were part of a larger group of mining claims leased from Clifton Mining Company (“Clifton”) and its affiliate, The Woodman Mining Company, in July of 2009. The original lease was amended in June of 2010. In February 2019, the lease agreement was again amended by a Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement (the “Amended Lease”). Under the terms of the Amended Lease, the Company relinquished its leasehold interest in all but the current Kiewit patented and unpatented claims. The lease term is 20 years and for so long thereafter as the mining claims are being actively used by the mill site and paved roadsCompany for commercial mining purposes. The Company is required to pay all year.


Mineral extraction activitiesproperty maintenance obligations with respect to the leased premises.

Under the terms of the Amended Lease, Clifton’s right to receive a 6% royalty interest from production on the property will be open-pitKiewit project was terminated. The Company also acquired from third parties and cancelled the remaining 1% outstanding royalty interest thereon, for which the Company paid each of two parties $50,000.

As consideration for entering into the Amended Lease, Clifton received $3,000,000, plus $13,390 in satisfaction of delinquent amounts owed Clifton, we paid $42,526 in a reclamation bond transfer, and we doissued 5,500,000 shares of our common stock to Clifton. In addition, the Company and Clifton entered into a Registration Rights Agreement to register for resale the shares issued to Clifton which requires the Company to register the shares within 18 months from the date of the Amended Lease. In the event the Company does not anticipate conductingregister the shares within the 18-month period, the Company is obligated to pay Clifton a royalty equal to 2.5% of the net smelter returns from the minerals generated from the Company’s mining claims. The Company has agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Rights Agreement for a period of three years.

Desert Hawk may mortgage or pledge its leasehold interest under the Amended Lease for purposes of financing exploration, development, and mining operations on the leased premises, including corporate overhead for such operations, but it cannot otherwise encumber the leased premises without Clifton’s prior, written discretionary consent. In connection with the PDK funding, the Company granted to PDK a security interest in all of the assets of the Company and issued and recorded a Leasehold Deed of Trust which included an assignment of leases, rents, as extracted collateral and contracts, a security agreement and fixture filing.


The Amended Lease cannot be assigned or subleased without the prior written consent of Clifton. Further, PDK may, without Clifton’s consent, hold a foreclosure sale, take title to the Company’s interest under the Amended Lease, or transfer or assign the Company’s interest under the Amended Lease. The Company may surrender the Amended Lease as to all or any underground mining.

25

part of the leased premises, after proper reclamation of all portions of the land to be surrendered affected by its operations. However, so long as any mortgage of PDK remains in effect, the Amended Lease cannot be modified, and Clifton will not accept a surrender of any of the leased premises or a termination or release of the Amended Lease, without the prior written consent of PDK, which consent cannot be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

Kiewit Geology and Mineralization

The Gold Hill area hosts lithologic units ranging in age from the Cambrian through to Quaternary Periods including six Paleozoic sedimentary formations of Carboniferous-age from the Cordilleran miogeosyncline. Geology of the Gold Hill Mining District is dominated by a large Jurassic granodiorite stock intruding the Carboniferous sedimentary package consisting of carbonates (limestone and dolomite) and lesser clastic sequences, notably shale and quartzite. The contact between the granodiorite and sediments is clearly intrusive at many localities. In other exposures, the contact is a post-intrusive fault contact or localized detachment fault.

Other lithologies in the District include silica breccias, jasperoids and assorted (locally tuffaceous) volcanics. minor small, intrusive plugs and dikes of probable Tertiary age also occur in the area. Most of the present-day surface is covered with colluvial slope wash and the canyons and narrow washes have alluvial fill of various thicknesses.

The Kiewit historic gold zone is hosted within a structural zone traceable on the surface for a distance of approximately 2.5 miles across the full length of the Kiewit project area and beyond. This structure trends north-north-easterly with a gentle westerly dip ranging 20-30 degrees, often occupying dip-slopes across the area. The zone comprises a 30 to 165 foot thick, gently westerly dipping gold bearing oxidized quartz stockwork section in granodiorite. The zone is mostly exposed on the surface and occupies the dip-slope located at the southern part of the Kiewit project area. Projected western and northern extensions of the stockwork dip under Carboniferous Sedimentary rocks, although it is ultimately truncated by the Rodenhouse Fault located approximately 2,500 feet to the west.

The Kiewit gold zone is part of a typical low-sulfidation gold bearing epithermal system. It is manifested as a zone of quartz and quartz-carbonate veining and stockworks within the more laterally extensive (2.5 miles long and up to 1,650 feet wide) Kiewit structural zone fault/fracture system. The Kiewit structural zone comprises a group of lithologies overlying a major fault zone that is manifested as a three to 16 feet thick silica breccia unit in granodiorite. A basal three to six foot thick quartz-carbonate vein overlies this basal silica breccia and is followed up-section by a fault-bounded interval of relatively unaltered granodiorite that forms the footwall of the stockworks. At some locations, this footwall granodiorite is absent and the stockwork zone is instead in fault-contact with the basal quartz-carbonate vein. The footwall of the stockwork zone is defined by faulting, with a north-north-easterly trend and shallow westerly dip. The “footwall” fault appears to have developed after the stockwork and served to juxtapose altered and mineralized rocks of the historic gold zone over relatively mineralized and fresh granodiorite. The amount of displacement along this fault is unknown and the structure may be regarded as a detachment zone.

Precious metals mineralization at Kiewit occurs primarily as electrum and is hosted in a stockwork zone associated with a low angle fault zone. The stockwork zone comprises argillic-propylitic altered granodiorite with randomly oriented to anastomosing veinlets, as well as veins with variable mix of white to grey chalcedony/quartz and white to beige carbonate and adularia. The veins are commonly less than two centimeters wide but larger veins with apparent thickness up to one meter or greater are present on surface and in diamond drill core. The larger veins display typical epithermal style open space fillings and have variable textures.

The mineralized stockwork is reported by Dumont to generally contain up to 30 randomly oriented veinlets making up 30% of the rock volume. The highest gold grades are also reported by Dumont to generally be associated with the larger veins or where vein density is greatest which suggests that the gold mineralization is spatially associated with the quartz-carbonate veins.



26


Kiewit Exploration Programs and Mining Activities

The Kiewit mining claims are without known reserves but beginning in 2014 the Company started extraction of gold without determining mineral reserves. The Kiewit mine is a small open pit, heap leach operation that produced gold and silver. Initial production at Kiewit commenced in June 2014 and was suspended in June 2016. Production was suspended due to low metal prices and undercapitalized operations. A fresh water well failure in July 2016, due to suspected sabotage, caused a complete leach pad shut-down. Fresh water pumping was re-started in mid-March 2017 mostly to reduce solution volumes as no sodium cyanide (NaCN) was being added. The mine resumed leaching activities in the spring of 2018 and recovered some gold but suspended operations again in October 2018 to secure funding for continued operations. In April 2019 we recommenced mining operations with our first sale in September 2019.

History


of Previous Mining Activities

The Gold Hill area is one of the oldest mining districts in the State of Utah. It reflects 43 known historical producing deposits mined primarily from the mid-1800s until the end of World War II. These deposits included gold, silver, copper, bismuth, lead, zinc, tungsten, arsenic, molybdenum, cobalt, and beryllium. Exploration and mining activities commenced in the mid-1800s as travel westward through the area to California was at its peak. Lead mineralization first attracted the attention of travelers prompting early prospecting. Placer gold was first discovered in the Gold Hill area in 1858. These early prospectors were hampered by repeated attacks of local Native American tribes and the area was abandoned until 1869 when the settlements of Gold Hill and Clifton were reestablished.


A lead smelter was constructed at Clifton in 1872 and relocated to Gold Hill in 1874. However, mining activity did not commence in earnest until 1892 when a mill and smelter were constructed at Gold Hill. Substantial quantities of gold and silver ore were processed at this site between 1892 and 1896. Mining activity gradually diminished until 1905 when exploration for copper revived the area. With the outbreak of World War I and the completion of the Deep Creek Railroad between Gold Hill and Wendover, a new revival of interest in the area commenced. Gold, silver, copper and lead were produced and approximately 3,000 residents lived in Gold Hill and Clifton at the time.


Tungsten was produced beginning in 1912. Significant amounts of gold and bismuth were also reportedly extracted during this period. Two mines produced tungsten in 1914 and 1917 and were operated primarily for the strategic requirement of tungsten during the two world wars. Gold and silver mining ceased completely with the beginning of World War II since the few remaining miners focused their attention on the production of strategic metals such as arsenic and tungsten to support the war effort.


Arsenic was produced beginning with the outbreak of World War I and was used primarily for pesticides in the cotton fields of the south. Two former copper producers also produced arsenic between 1923 and 1925. One of the mines reopened during World War II to produce arsenic for the war effort. None of the arsenic deposits previously mined are located on our claims.


The first large-scale geological study of the area was published in 1935 by T. B. Nolan as U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 177 and is referred to herein as the Nolan Report. The Nolan Report provided the first detailed data on the mining district.


The mining district remained largely dormant during the period after World War II through the mid-1970’s.mid-1970s. Between this period and the mid-1990s, several mining companies began to consolidate the fragmented land holdings in the area and conducted a more regional-scale exploration operation.operation was conducted. In 1993 Clifton Mining Company acquired several of the mining claims in the area and subsequently purchased Woodman Mining Company which also held claims in the district. After purchase of the claims, Clifton Mining commenced additional exploration activities and in 1997 developed road access up the Clifton Hills area. Clifton completed construction of a 50 ton per day mill at the Cactus Mill site and started construction of a 500 ton per day gravity-flotation mill at the same location. In 1999 Clifton Mining borrowed funds which financed upgrades to the mill.


Between 1994 and 1997 Kennecott Utah Copper, now owned by Rio Tinto, explored a large region of the district. In December 2002 Clifton Mining and Woodman Mining entered into an option-joint venture agreement with Dumont Nickel Inc., which in 2010 changed its name to DNI Metals Inc. The joint venture ultimately covered approximately 10.3 square miles of mineral properties but did not include the Yellow Hammer claims which were controlled by the Moeller family. In 2003 Dumont commenced exploring the properties with the objective of identifying bulk mineable gold, copper and silver targets through regional work as well as several drill programs. Beginning in 2004 Dumont completed a regional-scale grid and reconnaissance rock and soil sampling exploration program with detailed, targeted exploration work over the Clifton Shears Corridor, the Kiewit Zone and the prior zone owned by Kennecott. Ultimately, Dumont determined that the scale of the project was too small and decided to sell its interest in the project. In July 2009 Dumont completed the sale of all its mineral properties in this area to Clifton Mining Company for $255,000 cash and a 0.5% net smelter return royalty against future production proceeds from the Cane Springs Property and from portions of the Kiewit project claims. The joint venture and the option agreement were both subsequently dissolved and terminated.  Through our lease agreement with Clifton

Processing Plant and Mining we have access to all reports and core samples prepared by Dumont Nickel during the period of the joint venture.


27


Evidence of priorEquipment

The Kiewit mine is an open pit mine using conventional open pit mining activities onmethods with drilling, blasting, loading with a wheeled loader and truck haulage to the Yellow Hammer claimsore stockpile near the crusher. We recommenced operation of the mine in April 2019. We also use a top hammer drill for all blast holes and a dozer to move waste and for road building, as required. We use a grader and water truck for haul road maintenance. At the Kiewit claims is evidentleach pad we use a wheeled loader to feed the crusher and a dozer to level the pad.

The current processing facility can process approximately one million tons per year, which we plan to increase to three million tons if resource expansion dictates. We anticipate that this expansion will require an update or amendment of some permits. Ores are crushed, truck-stacked and heap-leached at the Company’s mine site.


Climate and Vegetation

The Gold Hill area lies within the region of the interior drainage that includes western Utah and most of Nevada, and, like the remaining portions of that area, is Pregnant solutions are passed through a high desert semiarid climate.  The area is composed of a highly dissected group of hills of relatively low relief.  The elevation of Gold Hill village is 5,321 feet.  The Gold Hill area is bounded on the east by the Great Salt Lake Desert at an altitude of about 4,300 feet, on the north by Dutch Mountain with a higher elevation of 7,735 feet, on the west by Clifton Flat at an approximate elevation of 6,600 feet, and on the south by Montezuma Peak with an elevation of 7,369 feet.

Pronounced differences in temperatures between night and day are common,conventional carbon column with the dryness of the air mitigating the high temperatures which predominate the summer days.  Annual precipitation averages approximately 12 inches with about half falling in the months from February to May.  Rainfall during summer to early fall is commonly in the form of severe thunderstorms.  Snow may be expected between October and May.  Fieldwork in the area is generally permitted throughout the year.

resultant gold-bearing carbon refined off-site.

Mining Permits

The higher portions of the Deep Creek Range and small areas near the summits of the adjoining mountains support a fairly heavy growth of yellow pine.  The lower slopes of these mountains have a sparse covering of juniper and piñon trees.  On the lower hills and on the gravel slopes surrounding them these trees give way to sagebrush.  The floor of the Great Salt Lake Desert in the north-east corner of the district is almost completely barren of vegetation.


Title to the Claims

Our principal focus will be on the following material properties:  the four patentedKiewit mining claims known as the Yellow Hammer claims, approximately seven of the unpatented load mining claims described as the Kiewit claims, and the unpatented mill site claim, all located in the Gold Hill Mining District of Tooele County, Utah.

There are significant differences between the ownership rights associated with patented mining claims and those associated with unpatented mining claims.  The granting of a patent is a relinquishment by the United States of its ownership of the land patented, and is the origin of private ownership of such land.  Thus, the owner of a patented mining claim has a fee simple title to the mining claim so patented.  The original locator and each subsequent owner of an unpatented mining claim,exist entirely on the other hand, has only “possessory” title which is dependent upon maintaining possession and is subject to a paramount title of the United States.  A mining claim locator’s possessory right is established by the physical act of “location” of an unpatented mining claim for minerals such as gold and silver on unappropriated public land that is open to mineral location, and remains valid so long as the unpatented mining claim is maintained in compliance with the Mining Law of 1872, as amended, and other federal and state laws and regulations.  Such laws and regulations require a mineral discovery, the making of the mining claim on the ground in a specific way, and the making of annual payments to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management referred to herein as the BLM, in order to maintain the unpatented mining claim.  Because possessory title is dependent upon the factual basis of these requirements, a determination that appropriate documents have been recorded in the county in which the mining claim is located and filed with the BLM does not ensure valid possessory title.

A valid unpatented mining claim may be held indefinitely and the mineral deposit mined without obtaining a patent from the United States.  There is no requirement that royalties be paid to the United States for minerals produced from unpatented mining claims.  However, proposals repeatedly have been introduced into Congress that would substantially modify the Mining Law of 1872 which could require, among other things, the payment of royalties to the United States.

28


We believe that we hold valid leasehold interests in all of our Utah mining claims and state leases, in particular the patented Yellow Hammer claims, the seven unpatented lode mining claims known as the Kiewit claims, and the unpatented mill site on the Cactus Mill property.  Nevertheless, there may exist conflicting interests in these claims.  In 1996 Clifton Mining obtained possessory title to the Cactus Mill site under a quitclaim deed from American Consolidated Mining Co., which had previously quitclaimed the site to another entity which recorded the deed after Clifton Mining. Because Utah has a race notice recording statute and the Clifton Mining deed was recorded first, management believes Clifton Mining holds valid possessory title to the site which has been leased to us.  In addition, a quitclaim deed recorded in 2009 from International Minerals & Metals Inc. and IMM-Dworkin Holdings, LLC to Clifton Mining references a royalty agreement granting a 0.5% royalty in favor of the grantors over a portion of the claims including the Kiewit claims.  No royalty deed has been recorded and management has been unable to locate the royalty deed.  Nevertheless, this royalty obligation may exist in favor of the original grantors.  Management does not believe that any of the exceptions to clear possessory title to the claims raises a material risk to planned operations and Clifton Mining has agreed to indemnify and hold us harmless from certain potential encumbrances.

Glossary

Archean:  Of or belonging to the earlier of the two divisions of Precambrian time, from approximately 3.8 to 2.5 billion years ago, marked by an atmosphere with little free oxygen, the formation of the first rocks and oceans, and the development of unicellular life. Of or relating to the oldest known rocks, those of the Precambrian Eon, that are predominantly igneous in composition.

Assaying:  Laboratory examination that determines the content or proportion of a specific metal (that is, gold) contained within a sample. Technique usually involves firing/smelting.

Development:  A development project is one which is undergoing preparation of an established commercially mineable deposit for its extraction, but which is not yet in production.  This stage occurs after completion of a feasibility study.

Dike:  A tabular igneous intrusion that cuts across the bedding or foliation of the country rock.

Exploration:  An exploration prospect is one which is not in either the development or production stage.

Fault:  A break in the continuity of a body of rock. It is accompanied by a movement on one side of the break or the other so that what were once parts of one continuous rock stratum or vein are now separated.  The amount of displacement of the parts may range from a few inches to thousands of feet.

Fold:  A curve or bend of a planar structure such as rock strata, bedding planes, foliation, or cleavage.

Formation:  A distinct layer of sedimentary rock of similar composition.

Geophysicist:  One who studies the earth; in particular the physics of the solid earth, the atmosphere and the earth’s magnetosphere.

Granitic:  Pertaining to or composed of granite.

Heap Leach:  A mineral processing method involving the crushing and stacking of an ore on an impermeable liner upon which solutions are sprayed that dissolve metals such as gold and copper; the solutions containing the metals are then collected and treated to recover the metals.

Intrusions:  Masses of igneous rock that, while molten, were forced into or between other rocks.

Mapped or Geological:  The recording of geologic information such as the distribution and nature of rock.

Mapping:  Units and the occurrence of structural features, mineral deposits, and fossil localities.

Mineral:  A naturally formed chemical element or compound having a definite chemical composition and, usually, a characteristic crystal form.

29


Mineralization:  A natural occurrence in rocks or soil of one or more metal yielding minerals.

Mineralized Material:  The term “mineralized material” refers to material that is not included in the reserve as it does not meet all of the criteria for adequate demonstration for economic or legal extraction.

Mining:  Mining is the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves to produce a marketable metal or mineral product. Exploration continues during the mining process and, in many cases, mineral reserves are expanded during the life of the mine operations as the exploration potential of the deposit is realized.

Pipes:  Vertical conduits.

Production Stage:  A “production stage” project is actively engaged in the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves to produce a marketable metal or mineral product.

Sedimentary:  Formed by the deposition of sediment.

Shear:  A form of strain resulting from stresses that cause or tend to cause contiguous parts of a body of rock to slide relatively to each other in a direction parallel to their plane of contact.

Vein:  A thin, sheet like crosscutting body of hydrothermal mineralization, principally quartz.

Geology

Our Gold Hill project is underlain by Carboniferous limestone and shale units of the Ochre Mountain Limestone, Manning Canyon, and Ochre Formations. Two distinctly separate igneous plutons intrude the sediments:  a Jurassic granodiorite in the north and an Oliglocene quartz-monzonite in the south.  Intense structural preparation is exhibited in different forms throughout the property with extensive primary north south fracturing exhibited in most areas.  Considerable east west fracturing exists in the center of the project area and appears to control and/or host mineral occurrences.  Generally, economic mineralization exhibits a close special relation to the Jurassic granodiorite with economic mineralization occurring both along the sediment contacts and the fractures within the intrusive. Nevertheless, there are no proven or probable reserves which would substantiate an established commercially minable deposit for extraction.  The close special relationship of the granodiorite to many of the mineral occurrences suggest it is the primary source of the mineralization.  The Nolan Report described several separate faulting, folding, and mineralizing events in the district.

The Kiewit occurrence has been characterized as a hydrothermal disseminated gold zone in a highly fractured granodiorite intrusion.   A specific horizon or low angle fault structure manifests itself as an anomalous gold blanket within the intrusion.

The Yellow Hammer mineralized material consists of several structurally controlled tabular and pipe-like copper, gold/silver, and tungsten zones hosted in the strongly altered quartz monzonite.  Copper oxides consist mostly of azurite, malachite and chrysocolla.  Sulfide copper minerals include chalcocite, chalcopyrite, covellite, and many other minerals including native copper.  Tungsten minerals are primarily sheelite.  Copper, gold, silver, and tungsten occur side by side within the shear zones.

Prior Exploration Activities

In connection with our review and assessment of the Yellow Hammer claims, we studied drill hole results from the 1960s, 1970s, and 1990s from drilling programs conducted by earlier exploration companies.  We selected certain areas of the claims where these prior drilling programs evidenced favorable results, and in fall 2009 we completed 116 drill holes on the Yellow Hammer claims ranging in depth from 16 to 72 feet, totaling approximately 6,000 feet of drilling.  The drilling was done with a leased air-track drill, which drilled 3½ inch holes using conventional compressed air.  Samples were collected on six foot spacing, bagged by company employees, and shipped by company truck to the American Assay Lab in Reno, Nevada, where the samples were wet-assayed for copper and the results sent to the company.

30


Subsequently, sample intervals from 22 of the better copper-grade drill holes were composited into 12 to 66 foot intervals and re-assayed for copper, gold, silver, and 68 other elements.

On the basis of the earlier drilling and our confirmation drilling, we calculated the mineralized material and concluded that sufficient mineralized material was present to justify removing the material by open pit and processing it at our pilot mill.  Metallurgical test work on the samples from the 2009 drilling was performed by McClellan Laboratories, Inc. in Reno, Nevada.  They performed mineralogical work to confirm that the primary sulfide copper minerals were approximately evenly split between chalcocite, covellite, bornite, and chalcopyrite, all of which would be amenable to flotation techniques.  McClelland’s baseline metallurgical test work confirmed that a +62% copper recovery at a +30% concentrate grade was attainable and that gold and silver recoveries were over 65% each.  McClelland also studied tungsten separation using a Knelson bowl but was unsuccessful.  Using the data from McClelland, we commenced optimization of the copper and tungsten and our internal results demonstrate recoveries are optimal at 90% minus 200 mesh.  Although we have no proven or probable reserves, we have calculated internally a mineralogical resource study of the mineralized material on the Yellow Hammer claims based on a cross sectional method the result of which is an estimated contained resource of approximately 25,000 tons grading 3.5% copper and 1% tungsten as WO3 and containing 0.05 ounce per ton gold and 1.5 ounce per ton silver.

In the Kiewit area, based upon our calculation of mineralized material based on drill results from prior drilling performed by Dumont Nickel Inc. from 2004 to 2006 and recent metallurgical test work by McClellan Laboratories, we also concluded that sufficient mineralized material was present to justify removing the material by open pit and processing it by leaching at a facility to be constructed near the Kiewit claims.   McClellan Laboratories completed a column leach test which resulted in 70% gold recovery on minus 1/8th material and with modest reagent consumptions due to the nature of the deposit (granodiorite).
For these reasons, we decided to concentrate our exploration activities in the Yellow Hammer and Kiewit areas for the near future.  Therefore, much of the near term exploration will be centered on known mineral occurrences on the Yellow Hammer and Kiewit claims.

Mineralization in the project area is manifested as:  contact-metasomatic in and around limestone-granodiorite contacts (skarns), as fissure quartz-carbonate-adularia veins within the intrusive body itself, and as copper-gold replacement deposits within both the limestone and the intrusion.   The Nolan Report concluded that together these styles of mineralization are indicative of epithermal and related porphyry systems.  Underlying thrust faults such as the Ochre Mountain thrust fault and the North Pass thrust fault along with numerous Mesazoic cross-cutting low-angle faults would have allowed magmatic or hydrothermal fluids emanating from the intrusion to migrate far from the intrusion and deep into surrounding wall rock.  Clastic shale units within the property may have acted to form traps where migrating fluids would have deposited metals.

We believe the structural, lithological, and geochemical signature of the Gold Hill area is favorable for a porphyry copper-gold system (and related skarns) proximal to the Jurassic granodiorite, and for sediment hosted gold deposits distal to the granodiorite intrusion.

Exploration Plans

With the funding from DMRJ Group, we have commenced processing mineralized material from our Yellow Hammer claims at the pilot plant located on the Cactus Mill property and we intend to commence processing activities on the Kiewit Claims upon receipt of the necessary permits.  Set forth below is a brief discussion of the material plans relating to these projects:

Cactus Mill Pilot Plant Rebuild.  The Cactus Mill site is located approximately 1/3 mile north and west of the town site of Gold Hill and approximately four miles north of the Yellow Hammer claims.  All needed access roads are already in place.  Milling began on this site in about 1919.  Prior to our recently completed rebuild activities, the site consisted of two buildings with a concentrated storage area.  Water for the area comes from the Cane Springs, located approximately 1,000 feet southwest of the pilot mill site and is piped to the pilot mill.

We confirmed anomalous sulfide copper, gold, silver, and tungsten during the fall 2009 drilling program on the Yellow Hammer claims.  Based upon the results of current independent and internal metallurgical work, we have modified and converted the existing mill on the Cactus Mill property into a larger and newer pilot facility to accommodate the treatment of this complex mineralized material.  This pilot plant is comprised of a copper flotation circuit followed by flotation and gravity circuit for tungsten.  Although most of the prior mill equipment is between 15 and 25 years old, it has been upgraded and modernized during this reconstruction process.  A new feed system has been installed and all major electrical equipment has been rebuilt or replaced.  A 350 KVA generator has been added to power the pilot plant initially, while a 150 KVA generator has been rebuilt to maintain support when the main generator is down.  Two 60 KVA and one 70 KVA generators have been added as support for the water well and construction.  We tested the facility during September 2010 and commenced processing mineralized material in October 2010.  We spent approximately $1,000,000 on the remodel and reconstruction of the pilot plan.

31


Mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims is providing the initial material for feed to the pilot plant.  It is transported to the pilot mill on existing county roads and crushed and ground at the site.  It is then put through the gravity separation system, where a salable concentrate is produced.  The remaining materials are then extracted using a regular floatation process and the concentrates will then be sold “as is” to a smelter.  We have commenced production of a copper concentrate with credits for gold and silver but have not produced sufficient concentrate to ship to smelter.  In addition, we are producing a gravity and flotation tungsten concentrate, but likewise we have not yet produced sufficient concentrate to ship to smelter.  Based on our current schedule of operations, and depending upon securing off-take contracts for the copper and tungsten concentrates, we anticipate commencing shipments of copper and tungsten concentrates in first quarter 2011.
Mineralized material is removed from the Yellow Hammer pit by an excavator and a loader.  It is then crushed with an impact crusher in closed circuit with a 1” x 1” screen.  The material is crushed and stockpiled on top of an apron feeder at the pilot mill and a backhoe is used to maintain the pile during operation.  The mineralized material is transferred from the pile by an electric/hydraulic variable speed apron feeder to a newly rebuilt 30” x 40’ weight-o-meter belt.  This belt feeds a 30” x 20’ feed belt which dumps into the pilot mill feed box.  Water is added to the mill feed material to achieve a density of 50%.  The slurry is fed to the mill through an eight inch pipe and elbow, and sealed on the mill feed end by a neoprene washer which has been drilled for water injection to help with sealing and lubrication.  Mineralized material is ground in a 150 horsepower six foot by seven foot steel lined mill with minus three-inch grinding balls.  Material which passes the one-inch discharge trammel falls to a sump where water is added to achieve a density of 30-35%.  This slurry is pumped back to the pilot mill feed box where an eight-inch cyclone classifies the material to achieve a 90% passing 200 mesh grind.  Oversized material returns to the mill feed box and mixes with new mineralized material and make-up water and returns to grinding.  Undersize cyclone material reports to a set of six each flotation rougher cells.  There are two stages of cleaning to produce the copper concentrate.  Rougher tailings are pumped to a bank of four spiral classifiers.   Spiral concentrates are pumped by a 2 x 2 diaphragm pump to an agitated surge tank which feeds a six-foot by twelve-foot Wiffley concentrating table.

From approximately September 27, 2010, until mid-October 2010, the pilot mill was in the startup testing phase.  Commencing October 20, 2010, the pilot mill has operated continuously processing mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims.  It is designed to operate at 10 tons per hour, but we have found that it operates most efficiently at approximately nine tons per hour.  During October 2010 the pilot mill was operated 75 hours per week and commencing November 1, 2010, it has been operated at a rate of approximately 96 hours per week.  We anticipate that the pilot plant will process at a rate of at least 3,600 tons per month.

We continue to adjust the specifications for the pilot mill to meet the requirements of the specific mineralized material fed into the plant.  The flotation circuit is performing approximately to plan in the oxidized horizon with copper recovery of between 50-60% depending on the exact feed, but the gravity circuit with the spiral classifiers followed by a Wiffley table is capturing more tungsten than expected and greater amounts of copper than anticipated.  As a result, we are adjusting the specifications for the mill to accommodate the unexpected volume coming off the table, which we do not anticipate will materially delay our operating schedule.  We estimate that as of December 31, 2010, we had produced approximately 100,000 pounds of copper concentrate and approximately 5,000 pounds of tungsten concentrate.

We have retained a concentrate broker with contacts to several local smelters to negotiate the selling price and terms to sell our copper and tungsten concentrates.  Although our broker has had preliminary discussions with potential smelters, we have no existing off-take agreements for our concentrates.  Based upon these preliminary discussions, we anticipate that we will be able to sell our concentrates to facilities in the Salt Lake City, Utah area, which is approximately 220 miles by good roads from our property.  We believe adequate local trucking services are readily available to transport the concentrates.

Tailings from our pilot mill are being stored in an existing and historic tailings area approximately 30 yards from the plant and adjacent to the location of the proposed heap leach facility.  Under the current terms of our existing Large Mining Operations Permit for the pilot mill, we are not limited as to the amount of tailings which we can store in this area.  We believe the operating duration of the pilot mill is not limited by the capacity of the tailings area and would permit processing of all of the mineralized material at the Yellow Hammer claims.
The milling process would also allow subsequent leaching of the tailings for oxide copper mineralized material if deemed economic. We are in the process of amending our existing permit to allow us to construct and operate a heap leach facility near the pilot mill.  In the event that gold bearing material is located in sufficient quantities on these claims, this material would be transported to the proposed Kiewit leach pad for processing.
Cactus Mill Heap Leaching Facility.  Upon receipt of necessary permits as discussed below, we intend to construct an approximately four acre heap leach facility for oxide copper mineralized materials to be built near the Cactus Mill pilot plant.  Management currently estimates that leaching would commence in mid-2011.  Management estimates that approximately 75,000 tons could be leached per year through this facility with dilute sulfuric acid.  Copper will be precipitated using the copper cementation process.  While approximately $100,000 has been spent to prepare and construct the heap leaching facility, we have budgeted an additional $500,000 from the DMRJ funds and $500,000 from the sale of copper concentrate from the pilot mill to complete the project.  Management estimates that this facility will accommodate processing of mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims for approximately two years, after which we anticipate constructing a larger facility near the Yellow Hammer claims, if warranted.
Kiewit Gold Claims.  Based on prior exploration work performed by Dumont Nickel between 2004 and 2006, management believes that mineralized material located on the Kiewit claims is a highly oxidized, highly fractured, highly disseminated and cyanide amenable hydrothermal gold deposit, with very minimal silver occurrences with the gold.  Independent metallurgical testing by McClelland Laboratories in Reno, Nevada, has shown recoveries of 70% of gold are achievable with very low reagent consumptions but with the need for very fine crushing to at least minus 1/8th inch.  We intend to extract mineralized material from three open pit mines and to process the material using a cyanide heap leach operation to recover gold and silver.  Mining, haulage operations, crushing and placement of the material on the leach pad is intended to be performed by outside contractors.   The claims are located approximately two miles west of the proposed leaching facility.  Removal of mineralized material from these claims is subject to obtaining the necessary permits as discussed below.

Kiewit Heap Leaching Facility.  We intend to process any mineralized material extracted from the Kiewit claims through a heap leach facility we propose to construct approximately 3,000 feet to the southwest of the Kiewit claims on patented claims we currently lease.  We estimate that the leaching facility would cover approximately 20 acres.  The project will entail the construction of an 800,000 square foot clay and plastic lined pad and ponds and a 1,500 gallons per minute carbon column recovery facility.  We have budgeted $3,500,000 to complete this project upon receipt of necessary permits as discussed below.

Permits

The Bureau of Land Management regulations stipulate that, as long as any exploration projects on federal lands are limited to an area within five acres, there are no requirements to perform an extensive environmental assessment or compose a Plan of Operation.  Larger projects would require a Plan of Operation which would consist of a reclamation plan and bond.  The BLM has shifted some of its land management and authority to state agencies, such as the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining which also regulates mining activities on state and private lands.  The Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Minerals also shares authority with the BLM to stipulate and enforce environmental protection measures which are generally regulated by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality.  Our proposed exploration activities are located in the State of Utah and therefore require various filings with the Utah Division of Oil Gas and Mining.  The Division requires all large mining operations to have an approved notice of intention and an approved reclamation contract in place and a surety bond posted.  All small mining operations must have a complete notice of intention filed with the Division.  All exploration projects must have a complete notice of intention filed with the Division.
32


We have retained North American Exploration, Inc. of Kaysville, Utah, to assist us in obtaining the operating permits necessary for our principal projects on the Gold Hill claims.  We have also retained JBR Environmental Consultants, Inc. of Sandy, Utah, to assist us with environmental issues relating to the permitting process.  We believe that because of the location of the mining property, obtaining the necessary regulatory permits will not be difficult or cause material delays.  The property is located in an historical mining district that has existing disturbances and mine wastes and is in a very arid, desolate area. The property is also adjacent to, and uphill from, the Dugway Proving Grounds and Air Force Gunnery Range that is deemed an environmentally insensitive area.  Existing water quality is low and relations with the few existing neighbors are good.  Management believes that through our leased patented claims we have adequate private land for process facilities.  There is no material access from any metropolitan area or community.  Management believes that no previous work by any operator has been contested by regulators or others.

Set forth below is a summary of the status of the permitting process for the various segments of the project:

Yellow Hammer Small Mining Operations Permit:  We hold a Small Mining Operations Permit from the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining.  This permit was approved by the Division on October 5, 2009.  We have also posted a reclamation bond of $25,300 with the Division.  This Small Mining Operations Permit stipulates that as long as any exploration or mining operations are limited to an area within five acres, there are no requirements to perform an extensive environmental assessment or complete a Plan of Operation.

Cactus Mill Site:  We currently hold a Large Mining Operations Permit from the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for the pilot plant which allows flotation and gravity concentration.  This permit was granted in October 1995 to Ivanhoe Joint Venture and was ultimately assigned to us on April 6, 2009.  We have also entered into a Reclamation Contract with the Division which was originally effective August 9, 2002, and transferred to us on April 6, 2010.  We have also posted a reclamation bond in the amount of $48,000 for this project with the Division.  Initially, mineralized material for this pilot plant will be generated exclusively from the Yellow Hammer claims under the above–referenced Small Mining Operations Permit.

Cactus Mill Heap Leach Project:  Since September 2009 we have been working with the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining and the BLM to amend our Large Mining Operations Permit for the Cactus Mill site to allow a test copper heap leach operation.  The amendment was originally filed in September 2009.  The BLM responded in February 2010 with a request for additional information, including such items as a process flow sheet, rock characterization and handling plan, spill contingency plan, and operations schedule.  In June 2009 we filed with the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining our third amendment to the Notice of Intention to Amend the Large Mining Operations Permit.  We anticipate completing the amendment process in early 2011.

The BLM is requiring an environmental assessment be provided with the amended Large Mining Operations Permit, although representatives of the BLM have indicated that a single environmental assessment for both the Cactus Mill amendment and the Kiewit application would be acceptable.  We estimate that the cost of preparing the environmental assessment will be approximately $38,000 and that it will be completed in early 2011.  We believe that the amended Large Mining Operations Permit process could be completed by first quarter 2011.  However, there a number of factors which could require longer to complete the amended permitting process, including delays caused by untimely regulatory reviews.  In June 2010, we submitted a Ground Water Discharge Permit Application with the Utah Division of Water Quality within the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, which, if approved, will be included as an appendix to the Large Mining Operations Permit.

Kiewit Project:   This deposit exists entirely on BLM unpatented mining claims from which an environmental assessment was previously completed by Dumont Nickel, a predecessor operator, on the affected area. The heap leach pad and process area will beare located on patented mining claims approximately 3,000 feet to the southsouthwest of the Kiewit claims.  We are in the process of transferring the exploration permit which has a completed Plan of Operation and environmental assessment from Dumont Nickel to us.  We anticipate completion of the transfer during first quarter 2011.

33


In February 2010 we filed an application with Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for a Large Mining Operations Permit to commence large mining operations for three open pit mines and a heap leach gold facility. Final approval was received in November 2012. In February 2010 we also submitted a Plan of Operation to the BLM and the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for exploratory drilling.  The Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining provided its initial review of this submittal.  We have submitted our response which is under review by the Division.  The application includes reclamation and storm water management.BLM. Final approval was received in January 2014. A separate Groundwater DischargePermit through the Utah Department of Environmental Quality was issued on December 7, 2010.


In addition to completing the notice of intent filing, we anticipate that the BLM will requirerequires an analysis of our Plan of Operation in compliance with the National Environmental Protection Act, which we anticipate will consist of our notice of intent filing with the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining once it is complete, which will require an environmental analysis on the project.  JBR Environmental Consultants has likewise been engaged to prepare this analysis.  We estimate the cost to prepare this environmental analysis will be at least $47,000 and could be higher depending upon the requirementsAct. Approval of the BLM.


Yellow Hammer Exploration:  In October 2008 the Utah Division of Oil, GasEnvironmental Assessment was issued in January 2014 and Mining issued an exploration permit for explorationdevelopment of the Yellow Hammer claims which was used to conduct our drilling program on these claims last fall.  We have also executed a Reclamation Contract dated October 13, 2009, with the Division and have postedproject began in February 2014 after posting a reclamation bond with the DivisionBond in the amount of $12,300 for this project.

Parties engaged$1,348,000. The bond has since been replaced with a surety bond in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reasonthe same amount, a condition of which was the deposit of $674,000 (50% of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.  Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on our planned operations and cause increases in capital expenditures or exploration costs or reduction in levels of mineralized material from future properties, if any, or require abandonment or delays in exploitation of new mining properties.

Water and Power

Pursuant to our lease agreement with Clifton Mining, we have access to Cane Springs, a natural flowing spring approximately 1,000 feet southwest of the Cactus Mill site, as well as the Cane Springs mine shaft located approximately ¼ mile south of the Cactus Mill. We have reconstructed pipe lines from Cane Springs and the Cane Springs shaft to the Cactus Mill pilot plant.  Management believes the water from these two sources will be sufficient to operate the pilot plant and the proposed Cactus Mill leaching facility.   We have been granted a one cubic foot per second water right from the Utah Division of Water Rights to provide water to the proposed Kiewit heap leach facility, which management believes will be sufficient to operate the proposed facility.  We intend to construct a well adjacent to the facility to provide this water. Prior work on this site by Dumont Nickel has identified water at a depth of approximately 350 feet.

We believe that the generators installedbond amount) into escrow with the pilot plant will be sufficient to provide the power necessary to operate the facility.  We have installed an 8,000 gallon diesel fuel tank which we estimate will permit running time of approximately five weeks before refilling is required.  We are also negotiating with a utility to provide a permanent power source by running power lines to the property for leaching facilities and pilot mill.  We believe thatbonding company.

The Company believes it has all necessary easements are in place for installationenvironmental permits and authorizations to support existing operations. As we expand or update the current mining plan of the power lines and estimate that the cost to install the lines would be approximately $13,000.  We are also exploring additional alternatives for power to the property.


Competition

The precious metal exploration and mining industry is highly fragmented.  We expect to compete with many other exploration companies looking for copper, gold, silver, tungsten, and other minerals. We are among the smallest of the exploration companies in existence and are a very small participant in the precious metal industry. However, we generally expect to compete favorably with other exploration companies since the claims held by the company in the Gold Hill Mining District consolidate the principal mining areas and limit the ability of other exploration companies to commence material exploration activities in the district.  Furthermore, if we are able to successfully recover copper, gold and other by-products from our claims, it is likely thatoperations (the “POO”), we will be able to sell all minerals thatrequire an update or amendment of some permits and before we are able to recover.

Copper mining is a significant industrycan implement any changes in Utah.  In particular,our operating parameters, we will be competing with Rio Tinto which operates the Kennecott Copper Mine, one of the largest open pit copper mines in the world, located in Salt Lake County, Utah.  However, management believes the market for copper is sufficiently strongneed to accommodate any mineralized material which we may extract.

34


The property is located reasonably near a populated area from which it will be able to draw manpower and supplies.  Management does not currently have customers for any copper, gold, silver,modify our existing permits or other minerals which we may produce.seek new permits. We anticipate that markets for these mineralsthe following permitting modifications will be required:

POO Modification: A POO modification would be required to support our planned increased production capacity, expansion of the mine pit, and the expansion of the leach pad. The POO modification must be submitted to the BLM, and the process would require National Environmental Policy Act compliance, including public review and comment. We submitted the modification in first quarter 2020 and anticipate obtaining this modification by fourth quarter 2020.

Air Quality Permit to Construct: A modification to the Air Quality Permit to Construct would be required for production increases from the one million tons per annum to the three-million-ton level. We anticipate submitting our application in first quarter 2020 and expect permit issuance by the end of 2020.

Water Discharge Permit: A modification to our existing water discharge permit would be required for the expansion including enlargement of the heap leach facility. The permit includes monitoring of the heap leach leak detection system and groundwater monitoring wells in the vicinity of the heap leach and process area. We anticipate submitting the modification in first quarter 2020 and expect permit issuance by the end of 2020.

Reclamation Plan: A Reclamation Plan Approval would be required by the Utah DOGM Office. However, the Aggregate Mine Land Reclamation Act would require approval by the Inspectors Office of the POO amendment addressing new infrastructure and disposal facilities. We submitted the POO amendment for approval in first quarter 2020 and anticipate permit approval by the end of 2020.

We are readily available and do not anticipate difficulty in selling any concentratesthe process of mineralized material which we may extract.  Notwithstanding this, management will need to evaluate transportation methods and costs when it obtains potential customers to determine whether existing prices for the mineralized materials would make sales to such customers economically viable.


Government Compliance
Our operations are subject to extensive federal and state laws and regulations designed to conserve and prevent the degradation of the environment.  These laws and regulations require obtaining various permits before undertaking certain exploration or mining activities and may result in significant delays, substantial costs and the alteration of proposed operating plans.  As discussed above under Permits, we have retained North American Exploration, Inc. and JBR Environmental Consultants, Inc.engaging outside consultants to assist us in obtainingseeking modification or new permits to accomplish the necessaryabove.

2018 and 2019 Mining Activities

During 2018 through October of that year we mined 50,000 tons of waste but did little or no crushing or processing. From October 2018 through the end of first quarter 2019, we ceased principal mining operations and environmental permitsfocused on securing funding. During that period the mine operation was on care and clearances.  Meeting these regulatory requirements necessitates significant capital outlaysmaintenance with water and may resultair quality monitoring ongoing as required by existing permits.

Using the funds from the PDK transaction, in liabilityJanuary 2020 we commenced a drilling program on the Kiewit and JJS mining claims to determine the owner and operatordefinition of the property for damages that may result from specific operations or from contaminationmineralized body and resource classification of the environment, allresources in connection with the proposed completion of which may prevent us from continuing to operate.

Our Cactus Mill pilot plant and the Kiewit claims are located on unpatented claims located on federal land, which also requires compliance with applicable requirements administered by the BLM.  These regulations impose specific conditionsa technical report on the natureclaims. Our drilling plan includes drilling 30 holes for a total footage of 7,500 feet. This drilling began on January 14, 2020.

Planned 2020 Exploration and extentMining Activities

We intend to continue our drilling program during the first three quarters of surface disturbance, the manner in which exploration and mining can be conducted, the disposition2020 at a further cost of spentapproximately $175,000.

We also intend to continue extraction of mineralized material, the use and containment of chemical leaching agents and other solutions, spill prevention, liquid and solid waste disposition, ground water monitoring, and a number of other matters which if violated could result in fines, penalties or attendant adverse publicity.


We are also obligated to make annual payments to the BLM for each of our unpatented mining claims on federal landore and to record an affidavit inupgrade and expand the Tooele County Recorder’s Office reflecting the payment of the annual maintenance fees to the BLM and stating our intention to hold the claims.  The 2010 annual maintenance fee payable to the BLM on our unpatented claims was $46,760 and was paid in August 2010.  The required affidavit was filed with the Tooele County Recorder on August 26, 2010.  Proposals repeatedly have been introduced in Congress that would substantially modify the Mining Law of 1872, the statute pursuant to which unpatented mining claims are located and maintained.  Bills have been introduced that would require, among other things, the payment of royalties to the United States.  Property taxes on the patented claims were $6,024 for 2010.  The 2010 mineral lease fees were $6,890. We do not anticipate that these taxes and fees will significantly increase in 2011.

Mining and exploration operations are also subject to both federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to employee health and safety.  We have employed a mine safety administrator to monitor our obligations under these laws and regulations.

Insurance

We maintain property and general liability insurance with coverage we believe is reasonably satisfactory to insure against potential covered events, subject to reasonable deductible amounts, through our exploration stage.

Offices and Other Facilities

We do not maintain separate offices for the company.  Mr. Jorgensen, our CEO, provides office space in his home in Spokane, Washington, for our principal executive offices.  Monthly rent for this space is $500 and commenced October 1, 2010.  Mr. Havenstrite, our President, operates primarily on site at our mining property in Tooele County, Utah.  He also works from his office in Reno, Nevada.  Monthly rent for the office space in Reno is $500 and commenced October 1, 2009.  This office space is used primarily for RMH Overhead, LLC, a business owned by him.  Agreements for the use of the office spacecurrent facilities, with these parties are month-to-month and can be cancelled at any time.

35


We rent a core-logging facility located on the Tooele County airport grounds in Wendover, Utah.  The facility includes a separate core splitting and sawing room, field supply storage rooms and sufficient floor space for logging tables and racks to hold over 21,000 feet of HQ core boxes.  Monthly rent for this space is $350 and the rental arrangement is terminable at any time.

Employees

We currently have 12 full-time employees, including our President, Rick Havenstrite who devotes approximately 90% of his time or 36 hours per week for our business.  In addition, we employ a project manager, a mine safety administrator, two mill operators, a mill helper, an electrician/maintenance man, three mine laborers, and two tungsten processors.  We have also engaged a metalurgist and a geologist on a part-time consulting basis.  All of these employees and consultants work at our Gold Hill project site.  We also employ our CEO, Robert E. Jorgensen, who will devote approximately 75% of his time or 30 hours per week for our business.  In addition, we have a part-time consulting agreement with one of our directors, Eric L. Moe.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business.  However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.  We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

as resource expansion dictates.

MANAGEMENT


Current Management


The following table sets forth as of January 7, 2011,20, 2020, the namenames and ages of, and position or positions held by, our executive officers and directors, and the employment background of these persons:

persons, and any directorships held by the current directors during the last five years. The Board of Directors believes that all the directors named below are highly qualified and have the skills and experience required for effective service on the Board of Directors. The directors’ individual biographies below contain information about their experience, qualifications and skills that led the Board of Directors to nominate them.

Name Age Positions DirectorSince Employment Background
Howard Crosby 67 Director, Chairman 2016 Mr. Crosby served as our Chief Executive Officer from April 2016 until April 2017. Since 1989, Mr. Crosby has been president of Crosby Enterprises, Inc., a family-owned business advisory consulting firm. From 1994 to June of 2006 he served as president and director of Cadence Resources Corporation, a publicly traded oil and gas company. He served as an officer and director of Independence Resources PLC from March of 2010 until October of 2013. He served as a director of White Mountain Titanium Corporation from 2004 until March of 2016. Both Independence Resources and White Mountain Titanium were previously reporting companies with the SEC. He currently serves as President and Director of Shoshone Silver/Gold Mines, Inc. Mr. Crosby is also a director or advisor to a number of privately held companies. He received a bachelor’s degree from the University of Idaho in 1975. Mr. Crosby has extensive experience in corporate finance and strategic planning and provides valuable insight on business strategy development and strategic partnership to our Board of Directors.

Name Age Positions 
Director
Since
 Employment Background
Robert E. Jorgensen 57 Chairman, CEO, & Treasurer 2001 Mr. Jorgensen has served as our Chairman and treasurer since February 2001; as a vice-president from November 2001 until October 2004, as president from October 2004 until April 2009, and as CEO since April 2009.  He served as president of Monarch Gulf Exploration, an oil and gas exploration company, from January 2005 until late 2007.
36

Name Age Positions DirectorSince Employment Background
Rick Havenstrite 61 Director, President and Chief Executive Officer 2009 Mr. Havenstrite has served as our President since April 2009 and as Chief Executive Officer since April 2017 and has been employed by us to manage our mining operations since August 2009.  Since May 1999 he has been the co-owner, with his wife, and President of Overhead Door Company of Sierra/Nevada, Inc., a commercial and residential door installation company and since 2004 has been a partner in RMH Overhead, LLC.  From 1998 until 1999 he was employed by Nevada Star Resources, a small copper mining company, as Manager of the Nevada Star Milford Copper Project in Utah; from 1996 until 1998 he was employed by Centurion Mines Corp, a exploration mining company, as Vice-president of Operations on the Milford Copper Project; from 1992 until 1996 he was General Manager of Nevada Operations for Arimetco Mining in Yerington Nevada, a mid-size copper mining company; from 1991 until 1992 he was employed by Nevmont Minerals, a small gold mining company, as Manager of the Golden Assets Mine in Montana; from 1983 to 1990 he was employed by Silver King Mines, which subsequently changed its name to Alta Gold Corp., a mid-sized diversified mining company, beginning his employment with the company as Project Engineer at the Buckskin Mine from 1983 to 1985, subsequently moving with the company to Ely, Nevada where he was the Mine Superintendent and then Mine Manager of the Robison Mine from 1985 to 1988, and finally serving as Manager of Mining for Alta Gold’s operating mines in Nevada, Idaho, Oregon and Colorado; and from 1980 until 1983 he was employed by Utah International, a large diversified mining company, as a mine engineer of the Springer Tungsten Mine in Nevada and the Navajo Coal mine in New Mexico.  Mr. Havenstrite graduated in 1980 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mining Engineering from the University of Reno, Mackay School of Mines.  He is a registered Professional Mining Engineer with the State of Utah and is an inactive Professional Mining Engineer in the State of Nevada.
         
Marianne Havenstrite 61 Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer -- Ms. Havenstrite has been our Principal Financial Officer from May 2013 to April 2016 and since March 2017. Since May 1999 she has been the co-owner with her husband, and has served as Vice-President, of Overhead Door Company of Sierra/Nevada, Inc., a commercial and residential door installation company and since 2004 has been a partner in RMH Overhead, LLC.  She received her Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Nevada, Reno in 1980.

Rick Havenstrite
 
 52 Director & President 2009 Mr. Havenstrite has served as our President since April 2009 and has been employed by us to manage our mining operations since August 2009.  Since May 1999 he has been the co-owner and president of Overhead Door Company of Sierra/Nevada, Inc., a commercial and residential door installation company.  From 1998 until 1999 he was employed by Nevada Star Resources, a small copper mining company, as manager of the Nevada Star Milford Copper Project in Utah; from 1996 until 1998 he was employed by Centurion Mines Corp, a exploration mining company, as vice-president of operations on the Milford Copper Project; from 1992 until 1996 he was general manager of Nevada operations for Arimetco Mining Yerington Nevada, a mid-size copper mining company; from 1991 until 1992 he was employed by Nevmont Minerals, a small gold mining company, as manager of the Golden Assets Mine in Montana; from 1983 to 1990 he was employed by Silver King Mines, which subsequently changed its name to Alta Gold Corp., a Mid-sized diversified mining company,  as the mine manager and superintendent on the Alta Gold Buckskin Mine and the Robinson Mine in Utah; and from 1980 until 1983 he was employed by Utah International, a large diversified mining company, as mine engineer of the Springer Tungsten Mine in Nevada and the Navaho Coal mine in New Mexico.  Mr. Havenstrite graduated in 1980 with a Bachelor of Science degree in mining engineering from the University of Reno Mackay School of Mines.  He is a registered Professional Mining Engineer with the State of Utah and is an inactive Professional Mining Engineer in the State of Nevada.
Robert E. Knecht 59 Vice-President & Director 2007 
Mr. Knecht has been retired since 2005.  From 1989 until 2001, Mr. Knecht was employed by EBI Securities Corp as compliance officer for the Spokane Washington branch.  From 2001 until 2003 he was self-employed as a business consultant and from 2003 until 2005 he worked in the collections department  for Citigroup in Meredian, Idaho.
William McAndrews 58 Director 2008 Mr. McAndrews has been employed as a marketing representative for Ron Rothert Insurance Services since April 2008.  From February 2002 until March 2008 he was employed as an insurance agent for Northtown Insurance.
John Ryan 48 Director 2009 Mr. Ryan served as a director of our company from February 2001 until 2007and as president from 2001 until 2003.  Since January 2010 he has been the management director of Sunrise Securities Corp., a boutique investment banking firm.  From January 2001 until December 2009 he served as president and director of Fontana Capital Corp., a venture capital firm.  He also serves as a director of the following reporting companies:  Gold Crest Mines, Inc.; Trend Mining Company; Independence Brewing Company; Direct Response Media, Inc.; Lucky Friday Extension Mining Company, Inc.; Mineral Mountain Mining and Milling Company; Tintic Standard Gold Mines, Inc.; Consolidated Goldfields, Inc.; and Silver Verde May Mining Company, Inc.
37


Eric L. Moe46Director2010Mr. Moe has been the president and a director of RMJ, Inc., a small development stage oil and gas company, since 2008.  From 2005 until 2007 he was chief executive officer of Daybreak Oil & Gas, Inc., a small oil and gas company.  Since 1998 he has also been self-employed as a business consultant to public and private companies, including Desert Hawk Gold Corp. for which he provided consulting services since 2007.

Name Age Positions DirectorSince Employment Background
John P. Ryan 57 Director 2017 Mr. Ryan served as our Chief Financial Officer for a short time period beginning in April 2016 until March 2017.  He has been an active entrepreneur in the resources sector for over twenty years. Since 1995 he has been self-employed through his own company, Quest Consulting, providing consulting services for both private and public mining companies.  He has extensive experience in the natural resource sector having served as an officer and/or director of companies such as Cadence Resources from 1995 to 2005 High Plains Uranium from 2004 to 2007, U.S. Silver Corporation from 2006 to 2009, and Western Goldfields, Inc. from 2001 to 2005.  From December 2012 through April 2017 he served as a director of Mineral Mountain Mining and Milling Company.  Mr. Ryan has extensive executive experience and provides our Board of Directors with valuable insights regarding mining operations as well as public company expertise. Mr. Ryan has acted as a professional Director in a number of cases of turnaround and/or distressed company scenarios.  Mr. Ryan obtained a B.S. in Mining Engineering from the University of Idaho in 1985 and a Juris Doctor from Boston College in 1992.
         
Phillip H. Holme 31 Director 2019 Since September 2014 Mr. Holme has served as Trading Officer of H&H Metals Corp., a private company engaged in trading of non-ferrous metals and concentrates, and which specializes in commercial recycling of most residues and byproducts resulting from the mining and metallurgical industry.   From 2010 until August 2014, he was employed initially as an intern and ultimately as an associate of Newedge Financial Ltd., a derivatives brokerage firm.  Mr. Holme graduated in 2010 with a Bachelor’s Degree in international economics and international affairs from George Washington University.

Rick Havenstrite and Marianne Havenstrite are husband and wife. From March 2018 through January 2019 we engaged H&H to provide certain mining consulting services. Mr. Holme was designated by H&H Metals Corp. to be a director of the Company in accordance with Section 3 of the Termination and Settlement Agreement dated January 16, 2019 between the Company and H&H. Mr. Holme was appointed a director concurrent with the closing of the Initial Funding by PDK on March 7, 2019.

Each director is elected until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified, except as otherwise provided in the Bylaws or required by law. We did not hold an annual meeting of the shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,2018, and we have not scheduled an annual meeting for the current year. Whenever the authorized number of directors is increased between annual meetings of the stockholders, a majority of the directors then in office has the power to elect such new directors for the balance of a term and until their successors are elected and qualified.


There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or person nominated or chosen by us to become a director, other than the relationship between our President, Rick Havenstrite, and our Treasurer/Principal Financial Officer, Marianne Havenstrite, who are married.

Officers are to be elected by the Board of Directors at its first meeting after every annual meeting of stockholders. Each officer holds his office until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings


During the past ten years there have been no events under any bankruptcy act, no criminal proceedings and no judgments, injunctions, orders or decrees material to the evaluation of the ability and integrity of any of ourthe executive officers or directors, or executive officers.


We are not aware of any legal proceedings in which any director, officer or affiliate of our company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of any class of our voting securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, or affiliate of our company, or security holder is a party adverse to us or our subsidiary or has a material interest adverse to us or our subsidiary.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

On July 24, 2009, we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement, which was subsequently converted into a lease agreement, with the Clifton Mining Company and Woodman Mining Company under which we received all of our Utah mining claims and leases, except for the Yellow Hammer claims.  Under the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement, we paid $250,000 and issued 500,000 shares of our commons stock to Clifton Mining.  The shares were valued at $350,000.  As a result of this transaction, Clifton Mining became a 5% shareholder of the company.  The shares are subject to a six-year lockup and leak-out agreement which prevents Clifton Mining from selling shares publicly for a period of one year from the original filing date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.    Thereafter, Clifton Mining may sell up to 20%none of these shares duringpersons has been involved in any 12-month period.  In September 2009, we acquired all of the rights and interest of Clifton Miningjudicial or administrative proceedings resulting from involvement in a $38,000 reclamation contract and a $3,777 cash surety deposit with the State of Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for the property.  As consideration for Clifton Mining selling us its interest in the reclamation contract and surety deposit, we issued 60,824 shares of our common stock to Clifton Mining.  These shares were valued at $42,579.

On November 30, 2009, we issued promissory notes to West C Street, LLC and Ibearhouse, LLC as a result of which they each became 5% shareholders of our company.  These three-year notes were issued in the principal amount of $300,000 each and bear interest at 15% which is payable monthly.  The full amount of interest is due and payable regardless of any prepayment of the principal amount of the note.  The principal amount of these notes and interest are convertible into our common shares at any time through November 30, 2012, at the rate of $0.70 per share.  The principal on each of these notes is convertible into approximately 428,571 shares.  If we fail to repay the loans at maturity, we have agreed to issue additional shares to the lenders at the rate of one share for each $2.00 owed at maturity and the maturity date will be extended for one year.  We also issued 150,000 shares each to the lenders as a bonus for loaning us the funds.  These 150,000 shares were valued at $105,000.

In December 2009 we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Blue Fin Capital, Inc., a Utah corporation owning mining claims in Arizona, for 2,713,636 shares of our common stock which were issued pro rata to the shareholders of Blue Fin.  We exchanged our common shares on a share-for-share basis with the shareholders of Blue Fin.  The aggregated value of the transaction was recorded at $2,485.  In connection with this transaction we issued 482,236 shares to Robert E. Jorgensen and 1,000,000 shares to Rick Havenstrite, each of whom was a shareholder, officer and director of Blue Fin at the time of the acquisition.  As of the transaction date Mr. Jorgensen was the CEO, a director and principal shareholder of our company and Mr. Havenstrite was President and a director of our company.  We also issued 100,000 shares to Stuart Havenstrite, a shareholder of Blue Fin and the father of Rick Havenstrite.  Further, we issued 1,131,400 shares to Eric L. Moe, a shareholder of Blue Fin, who became a 5% shareholder as a result of the transaction.  The closing of the transaction occurred on December 31, 2009, and Blue Fin became a wholly owned subsidiary of Desert Hawk.

38


In December 2009 we entered into a consulting agreement with Stuart Havenstrite, the father of Rick Havenstrite, our President and a director.  Pursuant to the agreement Mr. Havenstrite has agreed to provide geological services for our mining project.  The term of the agreement is for one year and we have agreed to compensate him at his regular hourly fee, provided that the aggregate payable for any month shall not exceed $6,000.  Either party may terminate the agreement at any time for cause.  The agreement may be extended by the parties and thereafter cancelled without cause at any time.

From October 2009 through December 31, 2010, we paid $7,500 to RMH Overhead, LLC, an entity co-owned and controlled by Rick Havenstrite, for office rent, and we continue to pay $500 per month for use of this office space pursuant to a Rental Agreement dated effective October 1, 2009, between us and RMH Overhead, LLC.  From August 2010 through December 31, 2010, we also paid this entity $350 per month for an aggregate of $1,750 as rent for the truck used by Mr. Havenstrite on our mining property.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, we also paid $15,000 to this entity for accounting services performed by Ms. Havenstrite during the period.  We have agreed to pay $2,000 per month for these continuing accounting services which may be terminated without cause at any time.  From April through December 31, 2010, we paid $32,279 to Overhead Door Co. of Sierra Nevada/Reno, Inc., an entity co-owned and controlled by Mr. Havenstrite, for work performed by its employees either at the mine sitemail or for hauling equipment.  During 2010 we also purchased two Ford trucks and a ladder from Overhead Door Co. of Sierra Nevada/Reno, Inc. for an aggregate of $8,800 and acquired building materials for $4,174.

On July 14, 2010, we entered into an Investment Agreement with DMRJ Group under which they agreed to provide loans of up to $6,500,000 and received 958,033 Series A Preferred Shares convertible into a like number of common shares.  As a result of this transaction, DMRJ Group became a 5% shareholder.

In July 2010 we issued 25,000 shares to Marianne Havenstrite, wife of Rick Havenstrite, our President, for accounting services renderedwire fraud or fraud in connection with our funding transaction with DMRJ Group.  These shares were valued at $17,500.

In July 2010 we issued 400,000 shares to John Ryan, oneany business entity, any judicial or administrative proceedings based on violations of our directors, for accepting appointment asfederal or state securities, commodities, banking or insurance laws or regulations, or any disciplinary sanctions or orders imposed by a director and for his prior services as a director.  We valued these shares at $280,000.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we paid $55,612 and $10,250, respectively to Eric L. Moe, one of our directors, for consulting services.  Effective September 1, 2010, we entered into a written consulting agreement with Mr. Moe which provides for a monthly payment of $10,000 and requires approximately 50% of Mr. Moe’s business time be dedicated to the business of our company.  The term of the consulting agreement is for four years but may be terminated for cause.  During the year ended December 31, 2009, Mr. Moe received $4,200 for providing us the use of office space in his home.
We rent a core-logging facility from Clifton Mining, one of our 5% shareholders, which is located at the Tooele County airport grounds in Wendover.  We began renting the space in January 2010 and pay $350 per month for this space.  For 2010, we paid $4,000 to Clifton Mining for use of this space.

39


Mr. Jorgensen, our CEO and Chairman, provides office space in his home for our principal executive offices at a cost of $500 per month commencing October 1, 2010, pursuant to a Rental Agreement dated effective October 1, 2010, between us and Mr. Jorgensen.  During 2010, we paid $1,500 to Mr. Jorgensen for this space.  As of December 7, 2010, we owed Mr. Jorgensen approximately $138,000 for unpaid salary accrued during the year ended December 31, 2006.  Mr. Jorgensen has deferred payment of this accrued salary until revenue is generated from operations of the company.

Independent Directors

Our securities are not listed on a national securitiesstock, commodities or derivatives exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that directors be independent.  As a result, we have adopted the independence standards of the NYSE Amex Equities (formerly known as the American Stock Exchange) to determine the independence of our directors and those directors serving on our committees.  These standards provide that a person will be considered an independent director if he or she is not an officer of the company and is, in the view of the company’s board of directors, free of any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment.  Our board of directors has determined that Robert E. Knecht, Bill McAndrews, and John Ryan would meet this standard, and therefore, would be considered to be independent.
other self-regulatory organization.


Committees

We have created a Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed of Robert E. Jorgensen, John Ryan, and Bill McAndrews.  Mr. Jorgensen is not considered an independent member of this committee.  We have not created any other committees.

Indemnification

Nevada law expressly authorizes a Nevada corporation to indemnify its directors, officers, employees, and agents against liabilities arising out of such persons’ conduct as directors, officers, employees, or agents if they acted in good faith, in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the company, and, in the case of criminal proceedings, if they had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful.  Generally, indemnification for such persons is mandatory if such person was successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any such proceeding, or in the defense of any claim, issue, or matter in the proceeding.  In addition, as provided in the articles of incorporation, bylaws, or an agreement, the corporation may pay for or reimburse the reasonable expenses incurred by such a person who is a party to a proceeding in advance of final disposition if such person furnishes to the corporation an undertaking to repay such expenses if it is ultimately determined that he did not meet the requirements.  In order to provide indemnification, unless ordered by a court, the corporation must determine that the person meets the requirements for indemnification.  Such determination must be made by a majority of disinterested directors; by independent legal counsel; or by a majority of the shareholders.

In addition to any other rights provided by Nevada law or our Bylaws, Article IX of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation mandates that the expenses of officers and directors incurred in defending any civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding, involving alleged acts or omissions of the officer or director in his or her capacity as an officer or director of our company, must be paid by the company or through any insurance purchased and maintained by us, including payment of expenses incurred in advance of the final disposition of the action so long as the indemnified party undertakes to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he or she was not entitled to be indemnified by us.  Article VIII of our Bylaws also provides that we indemnify our directors, officers, and agents to the full extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada.

Each of our employment agreements with Messrs Jorgensen and Havenstrite, and our consulting agreement with Eric L. Moe, contain mandatory indemnification provisions similar in scope and operation as described above.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of our company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

40


In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by any director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the sale of the shares in this offering, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation also provide that no director or officer will be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law.  However, a director or officer will be liable if his act or failure to act constituted a breach of his fiduciary duty and his breach of those duties involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Compensation


The following table sets forth information concerning the annual compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officer for all services rendered in all capacities to our company and its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 20102019 and 2009:


2018:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name & Principal Position Year Salary    
All Other
Compensation
  Total 
Robert E. Jorgensen, CEO 
2010
 $80,000  $ 1,500(1) $81,500 
  
2009
 $60,000   0  $60,000 
Rick Havenstrite, President   2010 $100,615   0  $100,615 
  2009 $44,682(2)  0  $44,682 

Name & Principal Position Year  Salary and Fees
$
  Option Awards
$
  All Other Compensation
$
  Total
$
 
Rick Havenstrite, President and CEO  2019   116,692   -   -   116,692 
   2018   120,000(1)  190,000(2)  12,000(3)  322,000 

(1)Mr. JorgensenHavenstrite’s 2018 compensation consisted of $120,000 in base salary, of which $101,538 was accrued in 2018 and paid in 2019. His amended employment agreement allows for a base salary of $144,000 at December 31, 2019.  In addition, in 2019, Mr. Havenstrite received $1,500$613,231 in wages accrued prior to 2019.
(2)Mr. Havenstrite’s option award of $190,000 in 2018 consists of options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $.40. The options were fully vested on the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is valued at $.19 as estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model.
(3)Mr. Havenstrite received $12,000 and $12,000 in 2019 and 2018, respectively (paid to RMH Overhead, a company owned by Mr. Havenstrite), as rent paid by the companyus for office space in his home which we use for our principal executive office.  This space is provided at a cost of $500 per month commencing October 1, 2010, pursuant to a Rental Agreement dated effective October 1, 2010, between us and Mr. Jorgensen.Reno, Nevada.
(2)  Of the total compensation paid to Mr. Havenstrite in 2009, $27,182 was paid for services performed for us as our President and for managing our mining operations during the year and $17,500 was paid to RMJ Overhead, an entity owned by Mr. Havenstrite, for consulting services performed by him for us.
During 2009 and the first eight months of 2010 we paid Mr. Jorgensen $5,000 per month for his services as our Chief Executive Officer.  Effective September 1, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Jorgensen.  The term of the agreement is for four years, with automatic one-year extensions unless notice is given by either party.   Mr. Jorgensen is required under the terms of the agreement to devote a minimum of 75% of his business time to the affairs of our company.  Nevertheless, he may serve on the board of directors or serve as an officer of up to three companies not engaged in business which may reasonably compete with our business, provided that he would not be required to render any material services with respect to the operations or affairs of any other business which would exceed 25% of his entire business time.  He devotes not less than 30 hours per week to our business and currently has no other material business commitments to which he devotes a substantive amount of his time.  The annual base salary is $120,000 plus performance compensation of between 10% and 100% of the annual base salary based upon fulfillment of annual performance goals established by the Board or the Compensation Committee.  He is also entitled to a monthly car allowance of $500.  In the event we terminate the agreement without cause or if the agreement is constructively terminated by us, we have agreed to pay Mr. Jorgensen a severance package equal to three times the initial base salary if such termination occurs on or before August 31, 2011, and one and one-half times the largest annual base salary plus the largest annual performance compensation received by Mr. Jorgensen under the Agreement if such termination occurs after August 31, 2011, payable 75% within 30 days and the balance within 30 days of the first anniversary of the termination.
During the first eight months of 2010, we paid Mr. Havenstrite $8,000 per month for his services as our President.  

In September 2010 we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Havenstrite as President of our company. The term of the agreement iswas originally for four years, expiring September 1, 2014, with automatic one-year extensions unless notice is given by either party. The employment agreement was renewed for one-year terms beginning September 1, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. Mr. Havenstrite is required under the terms of the agreement to devote a minimum of 75% of his business time to the affairs of our company. Nevertheless, he may serve on the board of directors or serve as an officer of up to three companies not engaged in business which may reasonably compete with our business, provided that he would not be required to render any material services with respect to the operations or affairs of any other business which would exceed 25% of his entire business time. In spite of the minimum percentage of his time required in his employment agreement, Mr. Havenstrite currently devotes approximately 90% of his time, or approximately 3650 hours per week, to our business and approximately 10%, or 4five hours per week, of his business time to Overhead Door Company of Sierra/Nevada, Inc., his overhead door business in Reno, Nevada. He does not anticipate devoting more than 10%20% of his time to the business of his overhead door company during the term of his employment contract with us. The annual base salary is $120,000 plus performance compensation of between 10% and 100% of the annual base salary based upon fulfillment of annual performance goals established by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee.  InCommittee (if any). Effective May 1, 2019, the eventbase salary was increased to $144,000. No performance bonuses have been paid under the employment agreement since its commencement.

Under our employment agreement with Mr. Havenstrite, if we terminate the agreement without cause or if the agreement is constructively terminated by us, we have agreed to pay Mr. Havenstritehim a severance package equal to three times the initial base salary if such termination occurs on or before August 31, 2011, and one and one-half times the largest annual base salary plus the largest annual performance compensation received by Mr. Havenstritehim under the Agreement if such termination occurs after August 31, 2011,agreement, payable 75% within 30 days and the balance within 30 days of the first anniversary of the termination.

25

Outstanding Equity Awards


As at 2018 Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2019:

  Option Awards
Name Number of securities underlying unexercised options
(#) exercisable
  Option
exercise price
($)
  Option expiration date
Rick Havenstrite  1,000,000   0.40  February 23, 2023

Compensation of Directors

The following table sets forth the compensation of directors for the year ended December 31, 2019:

Director Compensation

Name Fees earned or
paid in cash
($)
  Total
($)
 
Howard Crosby  161,000*  72,000 
John Ryan  15,000   15,000 
Phillip H. Holme  15,000   15,000 

Director compensation for Howard Crosby of $161,000 shown above includes $94,000 accrued from previous years and $67,000 earned in 2019. Mr. Crosby’s compensation was increased from $5,000 to $6,000 per month effective June 1, 2019, and the director compensation for Mr. Ryan was set at $5,000 per quarter commencing second quarter 2019. Effective beginning second quarter 2019, we agreed to compensate Mr. Holme $5,000 per quarter for his services as a director.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Under the Amended and Restated 15% Convertible Promissory Notes entered into on July 14, 2010 there(the “Notes”), as corrected, between the Company and West C Street and Ibearhouse (the “Note Holders”), each a 5% shareholder of the Company, an agreement was made with the Note Holders to begin paying the monthly interest pursuant to the Notes in stock rather than cash. We issued 150,000 shares to each of the Note Holders for each of November 30, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 as penalty shares in connection with the extensions of the due dates of the Notes for three one-year periods. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we accrued $32,425 as interest payable to each Note Holder and accrued interest payable for each of these Notes at December 31, 2018 was $171,175.

Effective February 28, 2018, we entered into amendments to the Notes pursuant to which no interest is payable until May 31, 2019, and the interest rate on the Notes was changed to 10%. The Note Holders also waived past defaults under the Notes of non-payment of past-due interest payments and released the convertibility feature of the Notes. These Notes were no unexercised options,fully repaid by us in 2019.

Effective February 28, 2018, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with Ibearhouse and West C Street where the Company sold 4,500,000 shares of common stock that had not vested,to the convertible debt holders for $625,000 in cash and several concessions as to the convertibility, due dates and default provisions on their outstanding debt.

On October 14, 2016, the Company entered into 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes with each of the Note Holders in the principal amounts of $125,000. The notes are secured by all of the assets of the Company. Interest payments on the notes are deferred until May 31, 2019 and the notes mature on May 31, 2019. The notes were convertible by the holders at any time prior to maturity at the lesser of (i) $0.25 per share; or (ii) the price of any convertible debt or equity incentive plan awardsfunding (including the purchase of DMRJ Group’s interest by any third party.) During the year ended December 31, 2018, we accrued $12,500 as interest payable to each Note Holder and accrued interest payable for Mr. Jorgensen or Mr. Havenstrite.

each of these Notes at December 31, 2018 was $29,692. These secured notes were fully repaid by us in 2019.


On August 7, 2017, the Note Holders funded an additional aggregate of $500,000 under similar terms. These funds were used to sustain minimum operations of the Company until resolution of the DMRJ Group debt with the trustees. On February 28, 2018 both of these notes were amended to allow for the maturity date and the payment date for accrued interest to be changed to May 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we accrued $24,732 as interest payable to each Note Holder and accrued interest payable for each of these Notes at December 31, 2018 was $33,570. These notes were fully repaid by us in 2019.

During 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, we entered into several short-term notes payable with the Note Holders and with Rick Havenstrite, our President. Total borrowed was $91,680 during the first quarter 2019 and $249,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018. The notes bore interest at 10%, had a 2% loan initiation fee, and were due in full on March 31, 2019. These short-term notes were repaid in full, including 10% interest and a 2% loan initiation fee, in March 2019. 

Since 2009 we have leased our corporate office space from RMH Overhead, LLC (“RMH”), an entity owned and controlled by Mr. Havenstrite, our President and a director. From 2009 until February 2014 monthly rent was $500 per month and since March 2014 monthly rent has been $1,000. The rental agreement is from month-to-month and can be cancelled by either party at any time. During 2018 we paid an aggregate of $12,000 in rent for this space, $10,000 of which was paid and $2,000 was accrued, bringing the accrued rent due to RMH Overhead, LLC to $18,750. The accrued rent was fully paid by us in 2019.

On June 20, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with RMH to lease certain mining and crushing equipment, some of which was previously owned by the Company. The terms of the lease were 24 monthly payments of $9,212 which included interest at 15%. At the conclusion of the lease term, the equipment may be purchased by the Company for a nominal fee. Although the 24-month lease term had expired at December 31, 2018, $69,562 remained due on this agreement. This account, including late fees, was fully paid by us in 2019.

Marianne Havenstrite, wife of Rick Havenstrite, is employed by the Company and acts as our Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer. For the year ended December 31, 2018 Mrs. Havenstrite earned $72,000 of which $60,923 was accrued and paid in 2019, and for the year ended December 31, 2019, Mrs. Havenstrite earned $88,615. Mrs. Havenstrite currently devotes approximately 80% of her time, or approximately 50 hours per week, to our business and approximately 20%, or ten hours per week, of her business time to Overhead Door Company of Sierra/Nevada, Inc., her overhead door business in Reno, Nevada. We do not have a formal compensation agreement with Mrs. Havenstrite.

On February 23, 2018, the Board approved the grant of an aggregate of 2,400,000 options under the 2018 Plan exercisable at $0.40 per share which terminate February 23, 2023 in the amounts and to the following:

Rick Havenstrite – 1,000,000 options;

Howard Crosby – 1,000,000 options;

John Ryan – 200,000 options; and

Linde Havenstrite – 200,000 options.

On March 26, 2019, we entered into an option to purchase 64 patented mining claims for $500,000. On June 13, 2019, we entered into a letter agreement with the Clifton Mining Company whereby it would purchase 44 of the optioned claims and we would acquire the remaining 20 claims. Each party would pay one-half of the total purchase price for the claims. The purchase price was paid by each party and the closing of the acquisition occurred on June 14, 2019.


On March 29, 2018, we entered into a five-year Agency Agreement (the “Agency Agreement”) with H&H Metals Corp., a New York corporation (“H&H”) of which Phillip H Holme, one of our directors, is a principal. Under the terms of the Agency Agreement H&H agreed to provide us certain advisory services in regard to natural resources activities and to assist us in securing purchasers for minerals produced from its mining properties. As a condition for entering into the Prepaid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement, we negotiated a termination of the Agency Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”). Under the terms of the Termination Agreement, we paid H&H $600,000, agreed to pay an additional $200,000 within 18 months, and $36,000 as a payment against the final shipment of ore by the Company. In July 2008addition, we appointed Mr. Holme as a director of the Company upon the Initial Funding.

Policies and Procedures Regarding Related Party Transactions

We have not adopted a specific policy pursuant to which an actual or proposed financial transaction, arrangement or relationship with a related person is subject to review or approval or, if applicable, ratification, by our Board of Directors. Under Nevada law any contract or other transaction between the company and one or more of its officers or directors or another entity in which one or more of the directors or officers are directors or officers or are financially interested may be void or voidable unless (i) the common relationship is disclosed to the remaining disinterested directors who thereafter approve or ratify the contract or transaction; (ii) the common relationship is disclosed to shareholders and shareholders holding a majority of the voting power of the company, including shares held by the interested officer or director, approve or ratify the contract or transaction, or (iii) the contract or transaction is fair as to the company at the time it is authorized or approved.

Director Independence

Our securities are not listed on a national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that directors be independent. As a result, we have adopted the independence standards of the NYSE American (formerly known as the American Stock Exchange and more recently the NYSE MKT) to determine the independence of our directors. These standards provide that a person will be considered an independent director if he or she is not an officer of the Company and is, in the view of the Company’s Board of Directors, free of any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment. Our Board of Directors has determined that John P. Ryan would be considered independent.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information furnished by current management and others, concerning the ownership of our common stock as of January 20, 2020, of (i) each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, without regard to any limitations on conversion or exercise of convertible securities or warrants; (ii) all directors and named executive officers; and (iii) our directors, named executive officers, and executive officers as a group:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)  Percent of Class(1) 
Rick Havenstrite
1290 Holcomb Ave.
Reno, NV 89502
  5,162,066(2)  18.9%
Howard Crosby
1290 Holcomb Ave.
Reno, NV 89502
  1,000,000(3)  3.7%
John P. Ryan
5968 N. Govt. Way #305
Dalton Gardens, ID  83815
  600,000(4)  1.5%
Phillip H. Holme
509 Madisen Ave.
Suite 2210
New York, NY 10022
  1,500,000(5)  5.7%
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group
(4 Persons)
  8,262,066   29.0%
H&H Metals Corp.
509 Madison Ave., Ste. 1902
New York City, NY 10022
  1,500,000(6)  5.7%

Ibearhouse, LLC

Kelley Price

7806 NE 10th Street

Medina, WA 98039

  3,760,353   12.9%

West C Street, LLC

Richard Meadows

21838 NE 102nd Street

Redmond, WA 98053

  2,260,353   7.8%
Clifton Mining Company
705 East 50 South
American Fork, UT 84003
  5,810,824   21.8%
Marianne Havenstrite
1290 Holcomb Ave
Reno, NV 89502
  5,162,066(7)  18.9%

(1)This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders and is believed to be accurate. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of our common stock subject to options, warrants, or other conversion privileges currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of the date of this table, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such option or warrant but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Where more than one person has a beneficial ownership interest in the same shares, the sharing of beneficial ownership of these shares is designated in the footnotes to this table. As of the date of this table, we had 26,631,603 shares outstanding.
(2)Of these shares, 25,000 are owned of record by Mr. Havenstrite’s wife, Marianne Havenstrite, and 1,000,000 are owned of record jointly by Mr. and Mrs. Havenstrite.  These shares also include exercisable options to purchase 1,000,000 shares.
(3)Represents exercisable options to purchase 1,000,000 shares.
(4)Includes exercisable options to purchase 200,000 shares.
(5)The shares beneficially owned by Mr. Holme are owned of record by H&H Metal Corp., an entity controlled by Mr. Holme, who is deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares with the entity.
(6)H&H Metals Corp. is an entity controlled by Mr. Phillip H. Holme.
(7)Of these shares, 3,137,066 are owned of record by Mrs. Havenstrite’s husband, Rick Havenstrite and 1,000,000 are owned of record jointly by Mr. and Mrs. Havenstrite.  Also includes exercisable options to purchase 1,000,000 by Mr. Havenstrite.

To our knowledge, except as noted above, no person or entity is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the voting power of our Common Stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides disclosure as of December 31, 2019, ofcompensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  -0-   N/A   -0- 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  2,400,000  $0.19   -0- 
Total  2,400,000  $0.19   -0- 

On March 28, 2018 the Board of Directors adopted the 2018 Stock Option/Stock IssuanceIncentive Plan which was approved by the shareholders in August 2008.(the “Plan”). The purposepurposes of the plan isPlan are (a) to enhance our ability to attract and retain the services of qualified employees, officers, directors, consultants, and other service providers upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the successful conduct and development of our business largely depends, and (b) to provide eligibleadditional incentives to such persons or entities to devote their utmost effort and skill to the advancement and betterment of our company, by providing them an opportunity to acquire a proprietaryparticipate in the ownership of our Company and thereby have an interest in the success and increased value of our company and as an incentive to remain in our service.


Company.

There are 3,000,0002,400,000 shares of common stock authorized for nonstatutorynon-qualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock grants, and stock grantsappreciation rights under the plan,Plan, which are subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, and other situations.


41


No shares remain available for grants under the Plan.

The planPlan is administered by our board of directors; however, the Boardboard of Directors.  The persons eligibledirectors may designate administration of the Plan to participate in the plan are as follows:  (a)a committee consisting of at least two independent directors. Only employees of our company and anyCompany or of its subsidiaries; (b) non-employeean “Affiliated Company”, as defined in the Plan, (including members of the board of directors if they are employees of our Company or non-employeeof an Affiliated Company) are eligible to receive incentive stock options under the Plan. Employees of our Company or of an Affiliated Company, members of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors (whether or not employed by our company or an Affiliated Company), and “Service Providers”, as defined in the Plan, are eligible to receive non-qualified options, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights under the Plan. All awards are subject to Section 162(m) of any of its subsidiaries; and (c) consultants and other independent advisors who provide services to us or any of our subsidiaries.  Optionsthe Internal Revenue Code.

No option awards may be granted,exercisable more than ten years after the date it is granted. In the event of termination of employment for cause, the options terminate on the date of employment is terminated. In the event of termination of employment for disability or shares issued, onlydeath, the optionee or administrator of optionee’s estate or transferee has six months following the date of termination to consultantsexercise options received at the time of disability or advisors who are natural persons and who provide bona fide servicesdeath. In the event of termination for any other reason other than for cause, disability or death, the optionee has 30 days to usexercise his or one of our subsidiaries, provided that the services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for our securities.


her options.

The planPlan will continue in effect until all of the stock available for grant or issuance has been acquired through exercise of options or grants of shares, or until July 12, 2018,ten years after its adoption, whichever is earlier. The planAwards under the Plan may also be terminatedaccelerated in the event of certain corporate transactions such as a merger or consolidation or the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets.


Compensation of Directors

DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the compensation of our directors, excluding the named executive officers set forth in the Summary Compensation Table above, for the last fiscal year ended December 31, 2010:


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name Stock Awards  All Other Compensation  Total 
Robert E. Knecht  0   0   0 
William McAndrews  0   0   0 
John Ryan $280,000(1)  0  $280,000 
Eric L. Moe  0  $81,050(2) $81,050 
(1)  On July 31, 2010 we issued 400,000 fully vested shares to John Ryan, one of our directors, for accepting appointment as a director and for his prior services as a director.  We valued these shares at $280,000 based upon the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(2)  For the first eight months of 2010, we paid $5,000 per month to Eric Moe for consulting services and thereafter we paid $10,000 per month.  In addition, we paid a total of $1,050 to Mr. Moe for rent during 2010.

Effective September 1, 2010, we entered into a written consulting agreement with Mr. Moe which provides for a monthly payment of $10,000 and requires approximately 50% of Mr. Moe’s business time be dedicatedshares registered pursuant to the businessregistration statement, of our company.  The term of the consulting agreementwhich this Prospectus is for four years but may be terminated for cause. Mr. Moe is required under the terms of the agreement to devote a minimum of 50% of his business time to the affairs of our company.  Nevertheless, he must notify us if any possible conflicts of interest arise with any other endeavors.  He devotes not less than 20 hours per week to our business and the balance of his business to RMJ, Inc., a small development stage oil and gas company.  He receives $10,000 per month, or $120,000 per year, under the consulting agreement.  He is also entitled to receive performance compensation of between 10% and 100% of the annual base cash compensation based upon fulfillment of annual performance goals established by the Board or the Compensation Committee.
Directorspart, are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as directors.  The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors.  The Board has not adopted a policy to compensate directors.

42

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information furnished by current management and others, concerning the ownership of our common stock as of January 7, 2011, of (i) each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of our common stock, without regard to any limitations on conversion or exercise of convertible securities or warrants; (ii) all directors and executive officers; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group:
Name and Address of 
Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership1
  
Percent of Class1
 
Robert E. Jorgensen
8921 Indian Trail Road
No. 288
Spokane, WA  99208
  1,015,000   13.38%
Rick Havenstrite
1290 Holcomb Ave.
Reno, NV  89502
  1,025,0002  13.51%
Robert E. Knecht
250 E. James Ct. Drive #104
Meridian, ID  83646
  50,167   * 
William McAndrews
922 E. Brentwood Drive
Spokane, WA  99208
  8,333   * 
John Ryan
641 Lexington Ave. #2500
New York, NY  10022
  400,000   5.27%
Eric L. Moe
8305 N. Colton Place
Spokane, WA  99208
  1,131,400   14.91%
Executive Officers and
Directors as a Group
(6 Persons)
  3,629,900   47.85%
Clifton Mining Company3
80 West Canyon Crest Road
Alpine, UT  84004
  560,824   7.39%
Andrew and Karen Watling JTWROS
3567 Maidens Road
Powhatan, VA 23139
  391,500   5.16%
West C Street, LLC4
Richard Meadows
21838 NE 102nd Street
Redmond, WA 98053
  715,7145  8.81%
Ibearhouse, LLC6
Kelley Price
7806 NE 10th Street
Medina, WA 98039
  715,7147  8.81%
DMRJ GROUP I, LLC8
Carnegie Hall Tower
152 West 57th Street
New York, NY 10022
  958,0339  12.63%
* Less than 1%.
1 This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders and is believed to be accurate.  Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities.  Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants, or other conversion privileges currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of January 7, 2011, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such option or warrant but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.  Where more than one person has a beneficial ownership interest in the same shares, the sharing of beneficial ownership of these shares is designated in the footnotes to this table.  At January 7, 2011, we had 7,586,411 shares outstanding.
2 Includes 25,000 shares held by Mr. Havenstrite’s wife, Marianne Havenstrite.
3 Kenneth Friedman who has sole voting and investment power over these shares.
4 Richard Meadows has sole voting and investment power over these shares.

43


5 Includes 428,571 shares issuable upon conversion of the principal amount of an outstanding promissory note held by West C Street, LLC and 107,143 shares issuable upon conversion of the interest amount due for the promissory note as of December 7, 2010.
6 Kelley Price has sole voting and investment power over these shares.
7 Includes 428,571 shares issuable upon conversion of the principal amount of an outstanding promissory note held by Ibearhouse, LLC and 107,143 shares issuable upon conversion of the interest amount due for the promissory note as of December 7, 2010.
8 Mark Nordlicht  has sole voting and investment power over these shares.
9 Consists of shares issuable upon conversion of outstanding shares of Series A Preferred stock.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the shares of the Series A PreferredCommon Stock, may not be converted or exercised if the holder of the security, together with its affiliates, after such conversion or exercise would hold 4.9% of the then issued and outstanding shares of our common stock.
44

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

The table below sets forth information concerning the resale of the shares of common stock by the selling stockholders.  We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the common stock by the selling stockholders.  Assuming all the shares registered below are sold by the selling stockholders, none of the selling stockholders will continue to own any shares of our common stock.  Except for Phillip V. Renz who is a registered representative of a broker dealer unaffiliated with us, none of the selling stockholders is a registered broker-dealer or an affiliate of a broker-dealer.

The following table also sets forth the name of each person who is offering the resale of shares of common stock by this prospectus, the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person, the number of shares of common stock that may be sold in this offering and the percentage each person will own after the offering, assuming they sell all of the shares offered.
Name 
Amount
Beneficial
Ownership
Before
Offering
  
Percentage
of Common
Stock
Owned
Before
Offering1
  
Amount to be
Offered for
the Security
Holder’s
Account
  
Amount to
be
Beneficially
Owned
After
Offering1
  
Percentage
of Common
Stock
Owned After
Offering2
 
Dennis R. Allen  250,000   3.29%  250,000   0   0%
Thomas E. Anderson  16,666   *   16,666   0   0%
David J. Andrews  10,000   *   10,000   0   0%
Stacie Banks  4,167   *   4,167   0   0%
Steve Besso  14,285   *   14,285   0   0%
Thomas Black  10,000   *   10,000   0   0%
Craig Bodmer  4,167   *   4,167   0   0%
Max Burdick Family Trust3
  230,6663  3.04%  230,666   0   0%
Michael Clarke  16,666   *   16,666   0   0%
David Coombs  56,017   *   56,017   0   0%
DMRJ Group4
  958,0334  12.63%  958,033   0   0%
Milt Datsopoulos  66,667   *   66,667   0   0%
Wes Delaney  9,259   *   9,259   0   0%
Dennis Erickson  63,131   *   63,131   0   0%
C. Rick Flower  20,667   *   20,667   0   0%
George D. Hansen  43,5185  *   43,518   0   0%
Cindy Havenstrite6
  15,000   *   15,000   0   0%
Rick Havenstrite7
  1,025,0007  13.51%  1,000,000   25,000   * 
Stuart Havenstrite8
  100,000   1.32%  100,000   0   0%
Mark Huber  7,000   *   7,000   0   0%
Ibearhouse, LLC9
  715,7149  8.81%  865,7149  0   0%
Patrick Inglis  20,000   *   20,000   0   0%
Mike S. Jensen  25,000   *   25,000   0   0%
Robert Jorgensen10
  1,015,000   13.38%  1,015,000   0   0%
Mark Kamitomo  66,667   *   66,667   0   0%
Robert Knecht11
  50,167   *   50,167   0   0%
William Korum  7,000   *   7,000   0   0%
Hansen Family Trust12
  18,51812  *   18,518   0   0%
Hugh T. Lackie  28,750   *   28,750   0   0%
Mark Mackin  113,333   1.49%  113,333   0   0%
Larry Martin  4,167   *   4,167   0   0%
William McAndrews13
  8,333   *   8,333   0   0%
Daniel R. McKinney  90,500   *   90,500   0   0%
Eric L. Moe14
  1,131,400   14.91%  1,131,400   0   0%
Carole Morgan  24,000   *   24,000   0   0%
Mike Morgan  4,167   *   4,167   0   0%
William T. Morkill  40,000   *   40,000   0   0%
Ronald Noel  8,333   *   8,333   0   0%
Jack Ossello  8,333   *   8,333   0   0%
William L. Peterson  238,096   3.13%  238,096   0   0%
George Pimpl  10,000   *   10,000   0   0%
John A. Powell  10,000   *   10,000   0   0%
Martyn Powell  72,50015  *   72,500   0   0%
Rufus, LLC16
  15,00016  *   15,000   0   0%
Otto Razzler  15,000   *   15,000   0   0%
Phillip V. Renz  8,429   *   8,429   0   0%
Jim Rhoades  4,167   *   4,167   0   0%
Jon Sandstrom  87,440   1.15%  87,440   0   0%
Richard Seefried  1,852   *   1,852   0   0%
Darrell Seigler  30,333   *   30,333   0   0%
Gary Soulsby  30,000   *   30,000   0   0%
Rory T. Spellman  30,000   *   30,000   0   0%
Ronald M. Stoddard  30,000   *   30,000   0   0%
Donna Street17
  16,666   *   16,666   0   0%
James Topliff  16,250   *   16,250   0   0%
Ronald N. Vance18
  15,000   *   8,333   0   0%
West C Street, LLC19
  715,71419  8.81%  865,71419  0   0%
Andrew W. & Karen M. Watling, JTWROS  391,50020  5.16%  391,500   0   0%
David Wilson  12,500   *   12,500   0   0%
Heather Yakelly  8,000   *   8,000   0   0%
TOTAL
  8,058,738       8,327,071   25,000     
45


* Less than 1%
1 Based upon 7,586,411 shares outstanding at January 7, 2011.
2 Based upon 9,915,872  shares outstanding after the offering.
3 Sole votingsame class and investment power is held by Max Burdick.
4 In July 2010 we entered into an Investment Agreement with this selling stockholder pursuant to which it agreed to loan up to $6,500,000 to us to fund our mining projects.  As a bonus for entering into the financing arrangement with us, we issued 958,033 Series A Preferred Sharesentitled to the DMRJ Group.  The shares in this table designatedsame rights and privileges as being beneficially owned by this entity represent common shares issuable upon conversion of these Series A Preferred Shares.  Theall other shares of the Series A Preferred Stock may not be converted or exercised if the holder of the security, together with its affiliates, after such conversion or exercise would hold 4.9% of the then issued and outstanding shares of our common stock.  Mark Nordlicht has sole voting and investment power over these shares.
5 Includes 18,518 shares in the name of Hansen Family Trust with sole voting and investment power held by George D. Hansen.
6 Ms. Havenstrite is the sister of Rick Havenstrite, our President and a director.
7 Mr. Havenstrite has served as a director and President of our Company since 2009.  He has been employed by us since August 2009.  We have entered into an employment agreement effective September 1, 2010, with him to serve as our President.  Mr. Havenstrite was a shareholder of Blue Fin Capital, Inc. and received 1,000,000 shares in our company in exchange for his shares in Blue Fin in December 2009.  The number of shares beneficially owned by Mr. Havenstrite Includes 25,000 shares held by his wife, Marianne Havenstrite.
8 We have entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Havenstrite to provide geological services on a part-time basis.  Mr. Havenstrite was a shareholder of Blue Fin Capital, Inc. and received 100,000 shares in our company in exchange for his shares in Blue Fin in December 2010.  Stu Havenstrite is the father of Rick Havenstrite, a director and President of our company.
9 In November 2009 we borrowed $300,000 from this selling stockholder and issued a promissory note evidencing the loan.  In connection with the loan transaction we also issued 150,000 as a bonus for loaning the funds to us.  The amount of shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder includes 535,714 shares issuable upon conversion of the principal amount and the current outstanding interest due on a promissory note dated November 30, 2009.  Sole voting and investment power is held by Mr. Kelly Price. The amount being offered for this security’s holder’s account includes 150,000 penalty shares issuable in the event we default in the repayment of the promissory note dated November 30, 2009.
10 Mr. Jorgensen has served as a director of our company since 2001 and as our chief executive officer since 2004.  Mr. Jorgensen was a shareholder of Blue Fin Capital, Inc. and received 482,236 shares in our company in exchange for his shares in Blue Fin in December 2009.  He also received 449,431 shares for services in our management.
11 Mr. Knecht has served as a director of our company since 2007.
12 George D. Hansen also holds 43,518 in his name.  Sole voting and investment power is held by George D. Hansen.
13 Mr. McAndrews has served as a director of our company since 2008.
14 Mr. Moe was a shareholder of Blue Fin Capital, Inc. and received 1,131,400 shares in our company in exchange for his shares in Blue Fin in December 2009.  He has provided consulting services for us since 2007 and entered into a written consulting agreement with us effective September 1, 2010.
15 12,200 Shares held by Equity Trust Company FBO of Martyn Powell, of which sole voting and investment power is held by Martyn Powell.
16 Sole voting and investment power are held by James Christopherson.
17 Ms. Street has provided outside accounting services for us on an as-needed basis since 2006.
18 Mr. Vance has served as outside legal counsel since 2008.  In September 2010, we issued 6,667 shares to Mr. Vance as a bonus.
19 In November 2009 we borrowed $300,000 from this selling stockholder and issued a promissory note evidencing the loan.  In connection with the loan transaction we also issued 150,000 as a bonus for loaning the funds to us.  The amount of shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder includes 535,714 shares issuable upon conversion of the principal amount and the current outstanding interest due on a promissory note dated November 30, 2009.  Sole voting and investment power are held by Richard Meadows.  The amount being offered for this security’s holder’s account includes 150,000 penalty shares issuable in the event we default in the repayment of the promissory note dated November 30, 2009.
20 Voting and investment power are held jointly by Andrew and Karen Watling.

Except as provided in the footnotes above, each of the selling stockholders received his, her, or its shares, or part of the shares owned by the selling stockholder, in one of the prior non-public cash offerings of our common stock.  In addition, several of the selling stockholders received shares for services rendered for us or as settlement of an abandoned merger transaction in 2002.  The following table sets forth the number of shares beneficially owned by the selling stockholders which were received by the selling stockholders for services or for settlement of the abandoned merger:

46


NameNo. of SharesConsideration
Thomas E. Anderson16,666
Services (8,333 shares)
Merger settlement (8,333 shares)
Stacie Banks4,167Services
Craig Bodmer4,167Merger settlement
Michael Clarke16,666
Services (8,333 shares)
Merger settlement (8,333 shares)
David Coombs8,333Services
Milt Datsopoulos666,667Services
Wes Delaney9,259Services
George D. Hansen18,518Services
Mike S. Jensen25,000Services
Mark Kamitomo66,667Services
Robert Knecht50,167Services
Hansen Family Trust18,518Services
Hugh T. Lackie8,333Merger settlement
Larry Martin4,167Merger settlement
William McAndrews8,333Services
Mike Morgan4,167Merger settlement
Jim Rhoades4,167Merger settlement
Jon Sandstrom10,417Merger settlement
Richard Seefried1,852Services
Donna Street16,666Services
James Topliff6,250Merger settlement
Ronald N. Vance15,000Services
David Wilson12,500Merger settlement

The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.  Under such rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the selling stockholder has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares, which the selling stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

Common Stock

Stock.

We are authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share. All common shares are equal to each other with respect to voting, and dividend rights, and, are equal to each other with respect to liquidation rights. Special meetings of the shareholders may be called by the Chairman or the CEO and by the Secretary upon the request of a majority of the Board of Directors or the holders of not less than one-tenth of all the shares entitled to vote at the meeting. Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote at any meeting of the shareholders for each share of common stock they own as of the record date fixed by the Board of Directors. At any meeting of shareholders, one-third of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum. A vote of the majority of the shares represented at a meeting will govern, even if this is substantially less than a majority of the shares outstanding. Subject to the rights granted to the holders of our preferred stock, holdersHolders of common shares are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor, and upon liquidation are entitled to participate pro rata in a distribution of assets available for such a distribution to shareholders. There are no conversion, sinking fund, redemption, preemptive or other subscription rights or privileges with respect to any common shares.


47


Directors are elected by a plurality of votes, which means that the persons receiving the greatest number of votes as directors for the number of directors to be elected at the meeting are elected to serve as directors, whether or not the number of votes cast represents a majority of the votes present at the meeting. OurThe common shares do not have cumulative voting rights, which would permit a shareholder to multiply the number of shares he owns by the number of directors to be elected and to distribute those votes among the candidates in any manner he wishes.


We refer you to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, our Amended and Restated Bylaws, and the applicable statutes of the state of Nevada for a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our securities.


Series A Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue 10,000,000 preferred shares and have outstanding 958,033 preferred shares designated as Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share.  The Series A shares have the following rights and preferences:

·The holders of the Series A shares are entitled to quarterly dividends equal to 10% of our consolidated net income for each quarter commencing with the quarter beginning July 1, 2011.  Nevertheless, if our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or listed on a senior exchange on or before July 13, 2011, and so long as the common stock continues to be so quoted or listed, no quarterly dividends will be payable or accrue.  In addition they are entitled to dividends or distributions made to the holders of our common stock to the same extent as if such holders of the Series A shares had converted their preferred shares into common stock.
·In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company, or a change of control transaction or the sale or lease of all or substantially all of our assets without the majority consent of the holders of the Series A shares, the holders of the Series A shares will be entitled to receive ratably an amount of the funds available for liquidation equal to the issue price of the Series A shares plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.  Any remaining funds available for distribution will be distributed pro rata among the holders of the common stock and the Series A shares assuming conversion of the Series A shares.
·The holders of the Series A shares are entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of common stock into which the Series A shares are convertible.  The Series A shares vote together with the holders of the common stock, except as provided by law.  In addition, so long as the principal or accrued interest on any DMRJ Group loan is outstanding, we are prohibited from taking the following actions without the separate consent of persons owning a majority of the Series A preferred shares:
oAmending our Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, or the articles of incorporation or bylaws of our subsidiary;
oEntering into another business;
oAdopting a new equity compensation plan or amend our current plan;
oRedeeming, retiring or acquiring our own securities;
oEntering into any merger transaction, selling, licensing or transferring any of our assets, or pledging or granting a security interest in our assets;
oEntering into any agreement or arrangement for the purchase of capital stock or a substantial portion of the assets of another entity or any type of joint venture or strategic alliance;
oDeclaring or paying any dividends on our equity securities, except the Series A shares;
oIssuing any debt or equity securities, except in certain limited circumstances;
oEntering into any insider transactions, except for transactions in the normal course of our business, the payment of customary salaries or other standard employee benefit programs available to all employees;
oCreating any subsidiaries;
oDissolving, liquidating, or reorganizing the Company;
oCreating any new indebtedness in excess of $1,000,000 other than trade payables and the indebtedness created under the DMRJ Group Investment Agreement;

48


oMaking any loans or advances to any person other than ordinary business expenses not to exceed in the aggregate $15,000;
oGranting any registration, preemptive, anti-dilution, or redemption or repurchase rights with respect to any securities; and
oBorrowing against, pledging, assigning, modifying, cancelling or surrendering any key man insurance policy maintained by or for us.
·The Series A shares are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time.  We have the right to mandate conversion if our stock has traded on the OTC Bulletin Board or on an exchange at a volume weighted average price per share of not less than $1.40 for each day over a period of 30 consecutive days with average trading volume per day of not less than 50,000 shares.  The conversion ratio of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is determined according to a formula computed by dividing the stated value of the preferred stock, which is designated as $0.70 per share, by the conversion price of the preferred stock, which is $0.70 per share, subject to the following limitations and conditions:
oIf we issue or sell shares of our common stock, or grant options or other convertible securities which are exercisable or convertible into our common shares, at prices less than the conversion price of our Series A shares, then the conversion price of the Series A shares will be reduced to this lower sale or conversion price.
oThe Series A shares may not be converted into common shares if the beneficial owner of such shares would thereafter exceed 4.9% of the outstanding common shares.
·We have the right to create and issue additional classes or series of preferred shares so long as the new class or series does not have preferences, limitations, or relative rights which are superior or senior to the preferences, limitations and relative rights granted the holders of the Series A shares.
·The holders of the Series A shares have preemptive rights to purchase shares of our common stock in any offering by us.
·There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Series A shares.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION


 We are registering outstanding shares

General

The Selling Stockholders may seek an underwriter, broker-dealer or selling agent to sell the Shares. As of our common stock to permit the resale of such shares of common stock by the selling stockholders, from time to time after the date of this prospectus.  We have agreed to maintainProspectus, no Selling Stockholder has entered into any arrangements with any underwriter, broker-dealer or selling agent for the effectivenesssale of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part for DMRJ Group until the earlier of (i) the date on which all of the shares included for it in the registration statement may be sold pursuant to Rule 144 without volume restrictions or public information requirementsShares.

Each Selling Stockholder and any and all restrictive legends have been removed from the shares and (ii) when all of the shares have been disposed of pursuant to the registration statement.  For all other selling stockholders we have agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement for a period not to exceed two years.  We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the selling stockholders of such shares of our common stock.  We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register these shares of common stock.


The selling shareholders will set a price of $0.70 per share until our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices.  These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions, in any one or more of the following methods:

·on any national securities exchange or quotation service on which the securities may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;

·in the over-the-counter market;

·in transactions otherwise than on these exchanges or systems or in the over-the-counter market;

·through the writing of options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;

·ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

49


·block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

·purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

·an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

·privately negotiated transactions;

·short sales;

·sales pursuant to Rule 144;

·broker-dealers which have agreed with the selling security holders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;

·a combination of any such methods of sale; and

·any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

If the selling stockholders effect such transactions by selling shares of our common stock to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissionswho participate in the form of discounts, concessionssale or commissions from the selling stockholders or commissions from purchasers of the shares of common stock for whom they may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal (which discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved).  In connection with sales of the shares of our common stock or otherwise, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn engage in short sales of the shares of common stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume.  The selling stockholders may also sell shares of our common stock short and deliver shares of common stock covered by this prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales.  To the knowledge of management, no selling shareholder has taken, or plans to take, a short position in our stock prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.  The selling stockholders may also loan or pledge shares of our common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares.

The selling stockholders may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares of our common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus or any amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, amending, if necessary, the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus.  The selling stockholders also may transfer and donate the shares of common stock in other circumstances in which case the transferees, donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.

The selling stockholders and any broker-dealer participating in the distribution of the shares of common stockShares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act,Act. As a result, any profits on the sale of the Shares by a Selling Stockholder and any commission paid,discounts, commissions or any discountsagent’s commissions or concessions allowed to,received by any such broker-dealer or agents may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. AtIf a Selling Stockholder is deemed to be an “underwriter” within the time a particular offeringmeaning of Section 2(11) of the shares of common stock is made, a prospectus supplement, if required,Securities Act, it will be distributed which will set forth the aggregate amount of shares of common stock being offered and the termssubject to prospectus delivery requirements of the offering,Securities Act. Underwriters are subject to certain statutory liabilities, including, but not limited to, Sections 11, 12 and 17 of the nameSecurities Act.

There can be no assurance that the Selling Stockholders will sell any or namesall of the Shares under this Prospectus. Further, we cannot assure you that the Selling Stockholders will not transfer, devise or gift the Shares by other means not described in this Prospectus. In addition, any broker-dealersShares covered by this Prospectus that qualify for sale under Rule 144 or agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation fromRule 144A of the selling stockholders and any discounts, commissionsSecurities Act may be sold under Rule 144 or concessions allowed or reallowed or paidRule 144A in certain instances, rather than under this Prospectus.

The Shares covered by this Prospectus may also be sold to broker-dealers.


Undernon-U.S. persons outside the securities laws of some states,U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under the shares of our common stockSecurities Act rather than under this Prospectus. The Shares may be sold in suchsome states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the shares of common stockShares may not be sold unless such sharesthey have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

50


There can be no assurance that If any selling stockholder will sell any or all of the shares of common stock registeredShares offered for resale pursuant to this Prospectus are transferred other than pursuant to a sale under this Prospectus, the subsequent holders could not use this Prospectus until a post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part or a prospectus forms a part.
supplement is filed naming such holders.


The selling stockholdersSelling Stockholders and any other person participating in such distribution willthe sale of the Shares may be subject to applicable provisions of the SecuritiesExchange Act. The Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder, including,include, without limitation, Regulation M, of the Exchange Act, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares of common stockShares by the selling stockholdersSelling Stockholders and any other participatingsuch person. In addition, Regulation M may also restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the shares of common stockCommon Stock to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock.  All of the foregoingparticular Shares being distributed. This may affect the marketability of the shares of common stockShares and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the sharesShares.

The Company intends to maintain the currency and accuracy of common stock.


We will pay all expensesthis Prospectus for a period of up to three years, unless earlier completely sold, pursuant to Rule 415 of the registrationGeneral Rules and Regulations of the sharesSecurities and Exchange Commission.

Resales of common stockthe Shares under State Securities Laws

The National Securities Market Improvement Act of 1996 (“NSMIA”) limits the authority of states to impose restrictions upon resales of securities made pursuant to the registration rights provisions contained in the registration rights agreements between usSections 4(a)(1) and the selling stockholders; provided, however, that a selling stockholder will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if any.  We will indemnify the selling stockholders against liabilities, including some liabilities under4(a)(3) of the Securities Act of companies which file reports under Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Resales of the Shares in accordance with the registration rights agreements, or the selling stockholderssecondary market will be entitledmade pursuant to contribution.  We may be indemnified by the selling stockholders against civil liabilities, including liabilities underSection 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act that may arise from any written information furnished to us(sales other than by the selling stockholders specifically for use in this prospectus, in accordance with the related registration rights provisions, or we may be entitled to contribution.


The selling stockholders have advised us that they have not entered into any agreements, understandings or arrangements with any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding the sale of the shares, nor is there an issuer, underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with the proposed sale of the shares by the selling stockholders.  If we are notified by any one or more selling stockholders that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares through a block trade, special offering, exchange distribution or secondary distribution or a purchase by a broker or dealer, we will file, or cause to be filed, a supplement to this prospectus, if required, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act, disclosing (i) the name of each such selling stockholder and of the participating broker-dealer(s), (ii) the number of shares involved, (iii) the price at which such shares were sold, (iv) the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to such broker-dealer(s), where applicable, (v) that such broker-dealer(s) did not conduct any investigation to verify the information set out or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, and (vi) other facts material to the transaction.

Once sold under the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, the shares of common stock will be freely tradable in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.

The selling stockholders are not restricted as to the price or prices at which they may sell their shares once our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board.  Sales of the shares may have an adverse effect on the market price of the common stock.

broker).

LEGAL MATTERS


The validity of the shares of common stockCommon Stock offered under this prospectusProspectus is being passed upon for us by Ronald N. Vance, AttorneyPearson Butler, PLLC, Attorneys at Law.  Mr. Vance beneficially owns 15,000 shares of our common stock.


Law, South Jordan, Utah.

EXPERTS


Our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20092018 and 2008,2017, appearing in this prospectusProspectus which is part of a registration statement have been audited by Child, Van WagonerDeCoria, Maichel & Bradshaw, PLLC,Teague, P.S., and are included in reliance upon such reports given upon the authority of Child, Van WagonerDeCoria, Maichel & Bradshaw, PLLC,Teague, P.S., as experts in accounting and auditing.


51


Certain information with respect to the metallurgy of our Yellow Hammer claims incorporated in this prospectus is derived from a report by McClelland Laboratories, Inc. and has been incorporated in this prospectus upon the authority of McClelland Laboratories, Inc. as an expert with respect to the matters covered by the report.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (SEC File No. 333-169701)333-_________) relating to the shares of common stockCommon Stock being offered by this prospectus,Prospectus, and reference is made to such registration statement. This prospectusProspectus constitutes the prospectus of Desert Hawk Gold Corp., filed as part of the registration statement,statements, and it does not contain all information in the registration statement,statements, as certain portions have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Upon the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, we will be

We are required to file reports and other documents with the SEC. We do not presently intend to voluntarily furnish you with a copy of our annual report. You may read and copy any materialsdocument we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the public reference room of the Commission at 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, between the hours of 10:9:00 a.m. and 3:5:00 p.m., except federal holidays and official closings, at the Public Reference Room.100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtainshould call (202) 551-8090 for more information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to you on the Internet website for the Securities and Exchange Commission at http://www.sec.gov.



FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)

 
52


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(Formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2010 and 2009

DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
  September 30,  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  
(restated)
(unaudited)
  
(restated)
 
 
ASSETS      
       
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $409,700  $888,434 
Deposits  500   500 
Accounts receivable  21   12,334 
Prepaid expense  21,117   - 
Note receivable  -   - 
Other receivable - Bouyan stock  -   40,000 
Marketable securities  19,890   - 
Total Current Assets  451,228   941,268 
         
MINERAL LEASE  775,000   775,000 
         
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net of depreciation of $17,243 and        
$9,585, respectively  243,562   16,607 
         
OTHER ASSETS        
Reclamation bonds  80,302   80,302 
Mining claims  2,485   2,485 
Water rights  250   - 
Mill renovation  120,855   - 
Total Other Assets  203,892   82,787 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $1,673,682  $1,815,662 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable $133,795  $30,681 
Accrued liabilities - officer wages  131,259   141,259 
Accrued expenses  -   1,079 
Accrued interest  -   10,500 
Accrued payroll  -   8,349 
Payroll liabilities  1,379   6,721 
Derivative liability  26,396   26,396 
Note payable  11,995   - 
DMRJ note payable, net of debt discount of $585,938 and        
$0, respectively  1,178,767   - 
Total Current Liabilities  1,483,592   224,985 
         
LONG-TERM DEBT CONVERTIBLE DEBT, net of debt discount        
of $151,375 and $201,833, respectively  448,625   398,167 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES  1,932,217   623,152 
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY(DEFICIT)        
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized        
         958,033 and 0 shares issued and outstanding respectively  958   - 
         
Common stock,  $0.001 par value, 100,000,000  shares authorized;        
7,586,411 and 7,071,044 shares issued and outstanding,        
respectively  7,587   7,071 
Additional paid-in capital  3,718,108   2,688,224 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  (510)  - 
Accumulated deficit prior to exploration stage  (1,016,591)  (1,016,591)
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage  (2,968,087)  (486,194)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)  (258,535)  1,192,510 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) $1,673,682  $1,815,662 

  September 30,  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $930,976  $8,716 
Inventories (Note 5)  2,851,737   1,193,341 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  99,385   40,475 
Total Current Assets  3,882,098   1,242,532 
         
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net (Note 6)  5,023,587   3,415,707 
MINERAL PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS, net (Note 7)  3,770,482   879,001 
RECLAMATION BONDS (Note 4)  724,433   753,290 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $13,400,600  $6,290,530 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $210,466  $652,895 
Accrued liabilities - officer and other wages (Notes 16 and 19)  -   922,039 
Interest payable - related parties (Notes 8, 9 and 10)  -   463,993 
Short-term notes payable - related parties (Note 8)  -   249,000 
Convertible debt - related parties (Note 9)  -   1,350,000 
Obligation under capital lease - related party (Note 10)  -   69,562 
Notes payable - equipment (Note 11)  897,813   324,111 
Settlement of consulting contract payable (Note 14)  200,000   - 
 Total Current Liabilities  1,308,279   4,031,600 
         
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES        
Asset retirement obligation (Note 13)  807,964   792,747 
Forward sales gold contract liability (Note 3)  10,600,000   - 
   11,407,964   792,747 
TOTAL LIABILITIES  12,716,243   4,824,347 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 19 )        
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Note 15)        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 26,631,603 and 20,881,603 shares issued and outstanding  26,633   20,753 
Additional paid-in capital  9,466,475   7,120,355 
Accumulated deficit  (8,808,751)  (5,674,925)
Total Stockholders’ Equity  684,357   1,466,183 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $13,400,600  $6,290,530 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-1


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

 
1


(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
              Period from 
              
May 1, 2009
 
              
(Re-entry into
 
  Three Months  Three Months  Nine Months  Nine Months  Exploration 
  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended  
Stage) to
 
  September 30,  September 30,  September 30,  September 30,  September 30, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009  2010 
                
 REVENUES $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
                     
EXPENSES                    
Consulting  89,716   48,524   159,036   70,944   246,128 
Officers and directors fees  332,295   15,000   401,960   45,000   469,142 
Exploration expense  274,227   53,257   374,278   63,697   493,402 
Legal and professional  81,355   56,604   180,815   52,476   253,359 
General and administrative  306,695   56,201   472,067   73,126   617,167 
Depreciation  7,658   -   10,139   -   17,243 
Total Expenses  1,091,946   229,586   1,598,295   305,243   2,096,441 
                     
OPERATING LOSS  (1,091,946)  (229,586)  (1,598,295)  (305,243)  (2,096,441)
                     
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                    
Interest income  -   -   -   -   40,000 
Other income  -   -   3,962   -   16,296 
Gain (loss) on investment sales  (181)  825   (310)  6,721   3,365 
Financing expense  (383,281)  -   (416,281)  -   (441,281)
Interest expense  (392,307)  -   (470,969)  (102)  (490,026)
Total Other Income (Expense)  (775,769)  825   (883,598)  6,619   (871,646)
                     
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES  (1,867,715)  (228,761)  (2,481,893)  (298,624)  (2,968,087)
                     
INCOME TAXES  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
NET LOSS  (1,867,715)  (228,761)  (2,481,893)  (298,624)  (2,968,087)
                     
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)                    
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities  (1,910)  1,650   (510)  -   (510)
                     
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(1,869,625) $(227,111) $(2,482,403) $(298,624) $(2,968,597)
                     
                     
                     
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE $(0.25) $(0.12) $(0.35) $(0.16)    
                     
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF                    
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING  7,408,422   1,850,687   7,187,002   1,850,687     

  Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30,  September 30,  September 30, 
  2019  2018  2019  2018 
REVENUE:            
Concentrate sales $103,195  $195,574  $103,195  $195,574 
                 
EXPENSES:                
General project costs  263,002   98,327   1,036,539   1,060,302 
Consulting  -   -   437,617   - 
Exploration expense  3,140   -   74,294   - 
Officers and directors fees  84,096   63,000   240,941   189,000 
Legal and professional  18,199   39,736   170,320   123,878 
General and administrative  66,358   39,114   175,955   640,788 
Loss on disposal of equipment  -   -   51,950   - 
   434,795   240,177   2,187,616   2,013,968 
                 
OPERATING LOSS  (331,600)  (44,603)  (2,084,421)  (1,818,394)
                 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                
Gain on extinguishment of DMRJ debt (Note 12)  -   -   -   24,916,561 
Interest and other income  1,827   57   1,827   176 
Interest expense  (20,575)  (11,649)  (28,063)  (39,103)
Interest expense - related parties  -   (35,577)  (31,412)  (534,841)
Loss on settlement of consulting contract (Note 14)  -   -   (900,000)  - 
Loss on settlement of redeemable stock (Note 19)  -   -   (63,094)  - 
Financing expense  -   -   (28,663)  - 
   (18,748)  (47,169)  (1,049,405)  24,342,793 
                 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES  (350,348)  (91,772)  (3,133,826)  22,524,399 
INCOME TAXES  -   -   -   - 
                 
NET INCOME (LOSS)  (350,348)  (91,772)  (3,133,826)  22,524,399 
                 
DEEMED CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF PREFERRED STOCK (NOTE 12)  -   -   -   4,068,720 
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS $(350,348) $(91,772) $(3,133,826) $26,593,119 
                 
BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $(0.01) $(0.00) $(0.12) $1.42 
                 
DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $(0.01) $(0.00) $(0.12) $1.20 
                 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING-BASIC  26,631,603   20,581,603   25,241,493   18,696,072 
                 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING-DILUTED  26,631,603   20,581,603   25,241,493   22,078,058 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-2


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)

 
2

(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS            

        
Period from
 
        
May 1, 2009
 
        (Re-entry into 
        Exploration 
  Period Ended  Period Ended  Stage) to 
  September 30,  September 30,  September 30, 
  2010  2009  2010 
          
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:         
Net loss $(2,481,893) $(298,624) $(2,968,087)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:            
Depreciation  10,139   -   17,243 
Common stock issued for services  358,167   -   403,167 
Cancelled common stock issued for services  -   (42,397)  (42,397)
Accrued interest income  -   -   (40,000)
Loss (gain) on sale of securities  310   (5,896)  (3,365)
Amortization of debt discount  134,164   -   142,331 
             
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Prepaid expenses  (21,117)  32,397   11,280 
Deposits  -   -   (500)
Accounts receivable  12,313   -   (21)
Accrued liabilities - officer wages  (10,000)  -   (40,691)
Accrued payroll  (8,349)  (15,541)  (8,349)
Accounts payable  103,114   2,946   130,621 
Accrued expenses  (1,079)  -   15,070 
Accrued interest  (10,500)  -   - 
Payroll liability  (5,342)  -   (5,342)
Net cash used by operating activities  (1,920,073)  (327,115)  (2,389,040)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Purchase of fixed assets  (237,094)  -   (260,805)
Purchase of mineral lease  -   -   (250,000)
Mill renovation  (120,855)  -   (120,855)
Reclamation bond  -   -   (37,500)
Purchase of water rights  (250)  -   (250)
Note receivable  -   12,500   27,500 
Proceeds from marketable securities  19,290   2,596   29,345 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities  (338,909)  15,096   (612,565)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            
Proceeds from notes payable  1,776,700   -   2,376,700 
Proceeds from sale of common stock  2,590   393,500   1,008,000 
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock  958   -   958 
Net cash provided by financing activities  1,780,248   393,500   3,385,658 
             
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  (478,734)  81,481   384,053 
             
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  888,434   53,693   25,647 
             
CASH, END OF PERIOD $409,700  $135,174  $409,700 
             
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:            
Interest paid $48,750  $-  $56,250 
Income taxes paid $-  $-  $- 
             
NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Common stock cancelled for prepaid expense $-  $-  $32,397 
Common stock issued for mineral lease $-  $-  $525,000 
Common stock issued for reclamation bond $-  $-  $37,500 
Treasury stock cancelled $-  $-  $10,000 
Stock received in satisfaction of note receivable $40,000  $-  $40,000 
 Debt discount on preferred stock $669,644  $-  $669,644 

For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018

        Additional     Total 
  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance, June 30, 2018  20,581,603  $20,453  $7,000,655  $(4,403,252) $2,617,856 
                     
Net loss  -   -   -   (91,772)  (91,772)
                     
Balance, September 30, 2018  20,581,603  $20,453  $7,000,655  $(4,495,024) $2,526,084 
                     
Balance, June 30, 2019  26,631,603   26,633   9,466,475   (8,458,403)  1,034,705 
                     
Net loss  -   -   -   (350,348)  (350,348)
                     
Balance, September 30, 2019  26,631,603  $26,633  $9,466,475  $(8,808,751) $684,357 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-3


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (unaudited)

 

For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018

              Additional     Total 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity Deficit) 
Balance, December 31, 2017  1,582,563  $1,582   13,956,603  $13,828  $9,143,418  $(31,088,143) $(21,930,897)
                             
Extinguishment of preferred stock (Note 12)  (1,582,563) $(1,582)  -   -   (4,067,138)  4,068,720   1,582 
                             
Stock options (Note 18)          -   -   456,000   -   456,000 
                             
Common stock issued for cash at $.40 per share  -   -   2,125,000   2,125   847,875   -   850,000 
                             
Common stock issued to convertible debtholders in connection with extinguishment of DMRJ debt (Note 12)  -   -   4,500,000   4,500   620,500   -   625,000 
                             
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   22,524,399   22,524,399 
                             
Balance, September 30, 2018  -   -   20,581,603  $20,453  $7,000,655  $(4,495,024) $2,526,084 
                             
Balance, December 31, 2018  -   -   20,881,603   20,753   7,120,355   (5,674,925)  1,466,183 
                             
Common stock issued in connection with acquiring mineral proprerties and interests (Note 7)  -   -   5,750,000   5,750   2,294,250   -   2,300,000 
                             
Common stock issued in connection with settlement of consulting contract (Note 14)  -   -   -   130   51,870   -   52,000 
                             
Common stock released in settlement of redeemable stock (Note 19)  -   -   -   -   -   (3,133,826)  (3,133,826)
                             
Net loss                            
                             
Balance, September 30, 2019        26,631,603  $26,633  $9,466,475  $(8,808,751) $684,357 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

F-4


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

 

  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2019  2018 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net income (loss) $(3,133,826) $22,524,399 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  605,854   313,346 
Gain on extinguishment of DMRJ debt (Note 12)  -   (24,916,561)
Stock based compensation  -   456,000 
Accretion of asset retirement obligation  56,019   54,384 
Gain on settlement of asset retirement obligation  (20,451)  - 
Loss on disposal of equipment, net  51,950   - 
Common stock issued for consulting contract settlement  100,000   - 
Common stock issued for settlement of redeemable stock  52,000   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Inventories  (1,658,396)  63,804 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (58,910)  55,466 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (442,429)  112,605 
Accrued liabilities - officer wages  (922,039)  149,462 
Interest payable - related parties  (463,993)  105,286 
Interest payable - DMRJ  -   451,891 
Settlement of consulting contract payable  200,000   - 
Net cash used by operating activities  (5,634,221)  (629,918)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Additions to property and equipment  (844,904)  (38,500)
Additions to mineral properties and interests (Note 7)  (900,000)  - 
Additions to reclamation bonds  (13,945)  (176)
Net cash used by investing activities  (1,758,849)  (38,676)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from sale of common stock  -   1,475,000 
Proceeds from note payable - related parties  91,680   100,000 
Proceeds from forward gold contract liability, net  10,600,000   - 
Payment on note payable - DMRJ  -   (625,000)
Payment of obligation under capital lease - related party  (69,562)  (15,930)
Payment of notes payable - equipment  (616,108)  (334,503)
Proceeds from convertible debt - related parties  (340,680)  72,000 
Payment of short term note payable - related parties  -   - 
Payment of convertible debt - related parties  (1,350,000)  - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  8,315,330   671,567 
         
NET INCREASE IN CASH  922,260   2,973 
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  8,716   4,212 
         
CASH, END OF PERIOD $930,976  $7,185 
         
NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Extinguishment of preferred stock $-  $4,068,720 
Equipment acquired with notes payable - equipment  1,189,810   141,631 
Accounts payable settled with notes payable - equipment  -   131,436 
Common stock issued for mineral properties and interests  2,200,000   - 
Funds sent by buyer directly to previous owner for purchase of royalty interest (Note 8) 2,200,000   - 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


Desert Hawk Gold Corp. (the “Company”), a Nevada Corporation, was incorporated on November 5, 1957 in the State of Idaho as Lucky Joe Mining Company.  On July 17, 2008 the Company merged with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lucky Joe Mining Company, a Nevada corporation, for the sole purpose of effecting a change in domicile from the State of Idaho to the State of Nevada.  Lucky Joe Mining Company (Nevada) was the continuing and surviving corporation, each outstanding share of Lucky Joe Mining Company (Idaho) was converted into one outstanding share of Lucky Joe Mining Company (Nevada). On April 3, 2009, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the State of Nevada changing the name of the Company to Desert Hawk Gold Corp.


1957. The Company was originally incorporated to pursue thecommenced its current mining business through the acquisition of prospective mining claims in the Wallace and Kellogg mining districts of Northern Idaho.  The Company never successfully generated any revenue, or joint ventures from any of the activities it pursued and abandoned the mining business in 1995 as a viable business model when the commodity prices cycled downward. Until it recommenced its mining activities in 2009, the Company was dormant. The Company is considered an exploration stage company and its financial statements are presented in a manner similar to a development stage company as defined in ASC Topic 915.   The Company entered the exploration stage on May 1, 2009.

On

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company acquired allentered into Joint Venture Agreements with the Clifton Mining Company (“Clifton”), the Woodman Mining Company and the Moeller Family Trust for the lease of certain of their property interests in the Gold Hill Mining District of Utah.  In 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with DMRJ Group, (a Platinum Partners related entity), which allowed for long term funding of the outstanding stockKiewit project and helped to provide cash flow for operations during the period from 2009 until 2014 while the permitting process was ongoing. The final permit needed to begin development of Blue Fin Capital, Inc.the Kiewit property was received in January 2014 and development began in February 2014. Construction at the site was substantially complete at September 30, 2014. Revenue from the heap leach operation began in October 2014 with the first sales of gold concentrate. Production commenced and revenues of approximately $7,200,000 from sales of gold and other metals concentrate have been received through September 30, 2019.

On March 8, 2018, the Company successfully finalized an agreement with the trustees of DMRJ Group (“Blue Fin”DMRJ”), a Utah corporation owning mining claims which eliminated the note and interest payable balance of $25,541,561 due to DMRJ in Arizona.  The Company issued a total of 2,713,636 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of Blue Finexchange for $625,000. In addition, all of the outstanding shares of Blue Fin.  Blue Fin was acquired from a related party, sopreferred stock held by DMRJ were retired and cancelled. See Note 12.

Prior to March 2019, ongoing undercapitalization continued to hamper the acquisition was recorded at the historical costCompany’s ability to operate. Due to lack of Blue Fin.  Blue Fin became a wholly-owned subsidiary offunding, the Company was temporarily shut down since third quarter of 2017. On March 7, 2019, the Company successfully finalized a forward gold sales contract agreement (the Pre-Paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”)) that provided funding and all inter-company accounts have been eliminated.


These unaudited interim financial statements have been preparedenabled production to resume later in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for complete financial statements.  These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.  In the opinion of management, these unaudited interim financial statements include all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented.  Operating results for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.

2019. See Note 3.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES


This summaryPOLICIES

In the opinion of significant accounting policiesmanagement, the accompanying unaudited interim balance sheets and statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company is presented to assist in understandingas of September 30, 2019, and the Company’sresults of its operations and its cash flows for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. The operating and financial statements.  Theresults for the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2019.

These unaudited interim financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity.  These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.


Accounting Method
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.  This Update amends to Subtopic 855-10, Subsequent Events – Overall, to require entities to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued.
4

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820).  This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, that require new disclosures and clarify existing disclosures. The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010.

Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company maintains its cash in two commercial accounts at two major financial institutions. The financial institutions are considered creditworthy and have not experienced any losses on their deposits.  At September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 the Company’s cash balances exceeded Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) limits by $8,113 and $0, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments as defined by FASB ASC 825-10-50, include cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses.  All instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at September 30, 2010.

FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair valuemanagement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1.  Observable inputs such as quoted pricesthe United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and are presented in active markets;

Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3.  Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company measures its investments at fair value on a recurring basis.

Marketable Securities
The Company accounts for marketable securities asU.S. dollars. These unaudited interim financial statements do not include all note disclosures required by ASC Topic 320 Investments – Debt & Equity.  At acquisition,U.S. GAAP on an entity is required to classify debt securitiesannual basis, and equity securities into one oftherefore should be read in conjunction with the following three categories:
Held to Maturity – the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. Amounts are reported at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
Trading Securities – bought principally for purpose of selling themannual audited financial statements included in the near term. Amounts are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.
AvailableCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for Sale – not classified in one of the above categories. Amounts are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported separately as a component of stockholders’ equity.
Mineral Exploration and Development Costs
The Company accounts for mineral exploration costs in accordance with ASC 932 Extractive Activities Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred, previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period the property is abandoned.  Expenditures to explore new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operating mines, are capitalized and amortized on a units of production basis over proven and probable reserves.
5

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
Mineral Properties
The Company accounts for mineral properties in accordance with ASC 930 Extractive Activities-Mining Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Costs of acquiring mineral properties are capitalized by project area upon purchase of the associated claims.  Mineral properties are periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost.  Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from five to seven years.  See Note 7.
Provision for Taxes
Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to ASC Topic 740-10-25 Income Taxes – Recognition.  Under the approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end.  A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by ASC Topic 740-10-25-5 to allow recognition of such an asset.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used for income tax purposes.

Significant components of the deferred tax assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 20092018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2019.

Accounting for Stock Options and Stock Awards Granted to Employees and Nonemployees

All transactions in which goods or services are received for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock or options to purchase shares of common stock are accounted for based on the fair value of the goods or services received or the fair value of the equity interest issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. For stock options, the Company estimates the fair value of stock-based compensation using the Black-Scholes model, which requires the input of some subjective assumptions. These assumptions include estimating the length of time employees will retain their vested stock options before exercising them (“expected life”), the estimated volatility of the Company’s common stock price over the expected term (“volatility”), the risk-free interest rate and the dividend yield. Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of the fair value of stock-based compensation.

Inventories

The recovery of gold from certain oxide ores is achieved through the heap leaching process. Under this method, mineralized material is placed on a leach pad where it is treated with a chemical solution, which dissolves the gold contained in the material. The resulting “pregnant” solution is further processed in a plant where gold is recovered. The Company records ore on leach pad, solution in carbon columns in process and gold doré, at average production cost per gold ounce, less provisions required to reduce inventory to net realizable value. Production costs include the cost of mineralized material processed; direct and indirect materials and consumables; direct labor; repairs and maintenance; utilities; depreciation and amortization of property, equipment, and mineral properties; and mine administrative expenses. Revenue from the sale of silver is accounted for as follows:

by-product and is deducted from production costs. Costs are removed from ore on leach pads as ounces are recovered based on the average cost per recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pad.


  September 30, 2010  
December 31,
2009
 
Stock based compensation $393,167  $35,000 
Net operating loss carryforward  3,591,511   1,467,785 
Deferred tax asset  1,354,791   510,947 
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance $(1,354,791) $(510,947)

At

Estimates of recoverable gold on the leach pad are calculated from the quantities of material placed on the leach pad (measured tons added to the leach pad), the grade of material placed on the leach pad (based on assay data) and an estimated recovery percentage (based on ore type). The nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, actual gold ounces recovered are regularly monitored and estimates are refined based on actual results over time. As of September 30, 2010,2019, the Company had a limited operating history and actual results only over that short period of time. Due to this, estimates of recoverable gold are based primarily on initial tests and only limited refinements.

Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net operating loss carryforwardsrealizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis. The ultimate recovery of approximately $3,591,511,gold from a leach pad will not be known until the leaching process is concluded. The quantification of material inventory on the leach pad is based on estimates of the quantities of gold at each balance sheet date that the Company expects to recover during the next 12-18 months.

Revenue Recognition

Sales of gold concentrate sold directly to customers are recorded as revenues and receivables upon completion of the performance obligations and transfer of control of the product to the customer. For concentrate sales, the performance obligation is met, the transaction price can be reasonably estimated, and revenue is recognized generally at the time of shipment at estimated forward prices for the anticipated month of settlement. Due to the time elapsed from shipment to the customer and the final settlement with the customer, prices at which expiresales of the Company’s concentrates will be settled are estimated. Previously recorded sales and accounts receivable are adjusted to the estimated settlement metals prices until final settlement by the customer.

Sales and accounts receivable for concentrate shipments are recorded net of charges by the customer for treatment, refining, smelting losses, and other charges negotiated with the customers. Charges are estimated upon shipment of concentrates based on contractual terms, and actual charges typically do not vary materially from estimates. See Note 17.

Earnings (loss) Per Share

Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the years 2015 through 2030.  The change inearnings of the allowance account from September 30, 2010 to December 31, 2009 was $843,844.

Company.

  Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2019  2018  2019  2018 
             
Net income (loss) $(350,348) $(91,772) $(3,133,826) $22,524,399 
Deemed capital contribution on extinguishment of preferred stock  -   -   -   4,068,720 
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders - basic  (350,348)  (91,772)  (3,133,826)  26,593,119 
Interest expense on convertible notes payable - related parties  -   -   -   55,561 
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders - diluted $(350,348) $(91,772) $(3,133,826) $26,648,680 
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic  26,631,603   20,581,603   25,241,493   18,696,072 
Dilutive shares – convertible notes payable – related parties  -   -   -   3,381,986 
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted  26,631,603   20,581,603   25,241,493   22,078,058 
                 
Basic income (loss) per share $(0.01) $(0.00) $(0.12) $1.42 
             
Diluted income (loss) per share $(0.01) $(0.00) $(0.12) $1.21 
                 
Excluded in diluted income (loss) per share as inclusion would have an antidilutive effect:                
Convertible debt – related parties  -   3,381,986   -   - 
Stock options  2,400,000   2,400,000   2,400,000   2,400,000 
   2,400,000   5,781,986   2,400,000   2,400,000 

Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit incurredof $8,808,751 through September 30, 2010, which raises substantial2019 and net loss of $3,133,826 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Both raise doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating toHowever with the recoverabilityfunding received under the Purchase Agreement (Note 3) in March 2019 and classificationworking capital of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event$2,573,819 at September 30, 2019, the Company cannot continue in existence.


An estimated $500,000 is believed necessarybelieves it has the ability to continue operations and increase development throughmeet its obligations for the next fiscal year.twelve months.

New Accounting Pronouncements

 In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842). The timingupdate modifies the classification criteria and amount of capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including demand for products and services and the availability of opportunities for expansion through affiliations and other business relationships.  Management intendsrequires lessees to seek new capital from equity securities issuances and private lenders to provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth, and fully implement its business plan.

6

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
If the going concern assumption were not appropriate for these consolidated financial statements, then adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values ofrecognize the assets and liabilities the reported revenues and expenses, andon the balance sheet classifications used.

NOTE 3 - CAPITAL STOCK

Common Stock
for most leases. The Companyupdate is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock.  All shares have equal voting rights and have one vote per share.  Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50%effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Upon implementation of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company.

In February 2010, the Board of Directors and shareholders owning a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock approved amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation.  On March 1, 2010, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada.  These Amended and Restated Articles decreased the par value of the common shares to $0.001 per share and authorized 10,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.001 per share.  All references to par value have been updated to reflect this change in par value.

Effective April 3, 2009, the Company reverse split the outstanding shares of its common stock at the rate of one share for each 12 shares outstanding (1:12).  Unless otherwise designated in these financial statements, all common stock amounts give effect to this reverse split.

During the second quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company closed its common stock private offering and issued 3,700 shares of common stock at $0.70 per share for a total of $2,590 in cash.  The shares offered were sold pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D.

During the period ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 511,667 shares of common stock for services valued at $358,167.

Preferred Stock
In July 2010 the Company filed a Certificate of Designations with the State of Nevada to create 958,033 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  The Series A Preferred Shares have voting rights with the common stock equal to the conversion value of the preferred shares into common shares.

In July 2010 the Company issued 958,033 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock to a lender and entered into a Registration Rights Agreement dated July 14, 2010, to register, either upon demand or by piggyback, the resale of the common shares issuable upon conversion of the preferred stock.  These preferred shares are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of one common share for each preferred share converted, subject to adjustment in the event the Company issues common shares or instruments exercisable or convertible into common shares at a price less than $0.70 per share, or if the Company effects a reverse or forward split of its outstanding shares or a reclassification of our common stock.

In connection with the issuance of the preferred stock, the Company has also recorded a discount to the loan proceeds in the amount of $669,644.  At September 30, 2010, $585,938 remains as a discount which is charged to interest expense over the life of the loans received in connection with the preferred stock.

NOTE 4 - STOCK PLAN

The Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan” on July 12, 2008, pursuant to which the Company may grant incentive and non-qualified stock options or shares of common stock to employees and consultants, including directors and officers, from time to time. The Plan authorizes the issuance of 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for grants of shares or the exercise of stock options granted under the Plan.  The Plan will continue in effect until all of the stock available for grant or issuance has been acquired through exercise of options or grants of shares, or until July 12, 2018, whichever is earlier.  The Plan may also be terminated in the event of certain corporate transactions such as a merger or consolidation or the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.
7

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
The exercise price of each option is established by the plan administrator.  Additionally, the plan administrator will fix the terms of each option, but no option will be granted for a term in excess of ten years.  Stock issued under the Plan may be granted for cash or other consideration determined by the plan administrator.  Options and stock granted under the Plan may vest immediately or upon terms established by the plan administrator.

There were initially 15,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for non-statutory and incentive stock option and stock grants under the Plan, which are subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, and other situations.  On April 3, 2009, the outstanding shares of common stock were reverse split at the rate of one-for-twelve, which reduced the number of shares authorized under the Plan to 1,250,000.  In February 2010 the Company amended the Plan to increase the number of common shares available from 1,250,000 to 3,000,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company granted 50,000 shares under the Plan and during the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company granted 24,999 shares under the Plan.  Of the shares granted in 2008, 16,666 were granted for legal and accounting services rendered and 8,333 were granted to a director for accepting appointment to the Board of Directors.  The shares granted in 2009 were for mining services.  All of the shares are fully vested.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 511,667 shares of its common stock as bonuses and for services under the Plan, including 400,000 shares to a director, and 111,667 shares as bonuses to employees and consultants.

NOTE 5 – MINERAL PROPERTIES
The Company holds leasehold interests within the Gold Hill Mining District in Tooele County, Utah, consisting originally of 419 unpatented mining claims, including an unpatented mill site claim, 42 patented claims, and seven Utah state mineral leases located on state trust lands, all covering approximately 33 square miles.  In August 2010 the Company paid the maintenance fees and other costs of maintaining the mining claims and leases held by it.  As a result of further evaluation, the Company allowed certain of the claims and leases to lapse back to Clifton Mining.  The Company has retained 334 unpatented mining claims, including the unpatented mill site claim, 42 patented claims, and five Utah state mineral leases located on state trust lands.  All but four of these mining claims and leases were obtained under the terms of the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement effective July 24, 2009, with Clifton Mining Company and Woodman Mining Company as lessors.  The four Yellow Hammer patented claims were obtained under the terms of the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement effective July 24, 2009, with the Jeneane C. Moeller Family Trust.  The properties are located approximately 190 miles west-southwest of Salt Lake City, Utah, and 56 miles south southeast of Wendover, Utah.  The Company intends to concentrate its exploration activities on the four patented Yellow Hammer claims, the Kiewit project consisting of seven of the unpatented Kiewit claims, and the Cactus Mill project consisting of an unpatented mill site.  Mineral extraction activities on the property will be open-pit and the Company does not anticipate conducting any underground mining activities.

Additionally, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Blue Fin Capital, Inc., holds eight unpatented mining claims in Yavapai County, Arizona.  The Company has no current plans to explore these claims.

There are no proven or probable reserves for any of the claims or leases held by the Company.
In January 2010 the Company submitted a notice of intent to commence large mining operations for three surface mines and a heap leach gold operation on the Kiewit unpatented claims.  In February 2010 the Company submitted a Plan of Operation to the Bureau of Land Management and the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for exploratory drilling on the claims.
8

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
The Company, through its lease agreement with Clifton Mining, has purchased all data, core samples and related reports from Dumont associated with the aforementioned properties.  In addition the Company has access to all data and related information available and held by Clifton Mining. Desert Hawk has made application for a Large Mining Operations Permit to construct a heap leach facility and commence exploration activities on these claims.

Cactus Mill Pilot Plant
Located on the Cactus Mill site are two process facilities, a 150 ton per day mill built by Woodman Mining and operated until the 1980’s.  The mill has equipment used to process copper, gold, silver, and tungsten ores from the district.  In addition there is a second facility constructed in the 1990’s for custom milling precious metals concentrates.  Equipment from both mills was used to construct a 240 ton per day pilot mill capable of recovering copper, gold, silver and tungsten ores initially extracted from the Yellow Hammer claims.  In September the Company completed its rebuild of the pilot mill and testing of the pilot plan was conducted in September and commencement of processing activities is scheduled to begin in fourth quarter 2010.  Pursuant to the Company’s lease agreement with Clifton Mining, it has access to Cane Springs, a natural flowing spring approximately 1,000 feet above the Cactus Mill site, as well as the Cane Springs mine shaft located approximately one-quarter mile south of the Cactus Mill property.  The Company holds a permit from the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for the pilot plant which allows flotation and gravity concentration.  The Company has filed an application to amend its permit to operate the pilot mill to allow construction of a heap leach facility near the mill to process mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims.

Yellow Hammer Claims
The Company completed approximately 6,000 feet of drilling on the Yellow Hammer claims in fourth quarter of 2009.  Composites were made of several key areas and re-analyzed for gold, silver, copper and tungsten.  Metallurgical work is ongoing at independent labs for evaluation.  The Company holds a Small Mine Permit from the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining and has posted a reclamation bond of $25,000.  This permit stipulates that the Company may conduct exploration or mining operations on these claims so long as such activities are limited to an area within five acres.

Exploration Expenditures
Exploration expenditures incurred by the Company during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 were as follows:

  September 30, 2010  December 31, 2009 
       
Assaying $9,260  $12,307 
Drilling  32,600   5,527 
Equipment rental  83,592   12,298 
Geological consulting fees  168,794   27,250 
Maps and miscellaneous  5,854   1,674 
Metallurgy  11,734   5,918 
Site costs  39,031   44,209 
Transportation  23,413   11,141 
         
Exploration expenditures for period $374,278  $120,324 
9

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLE

The Company issued two convertible promissory notes for a total of $600,000 on November 18, 2009.  The notes bear interest at 15% per annum.  Interest only is payable in equal monthly installments of $7,500.  The notes are convertible at any time at a rate of $1.50 per share, and are due November 18, 2012 or 36 months from the date of issuance.  In addition, the holders of the notes were issued 300,000 bonus shares of the Company’s common stock at a rate of one share for each $2.00 loaned.  Also, in the event the Company fails to repay the loan or interest thereon,new guidance, the Company will be required to issuerecognize a liability and right-of-use asset for its operating leases. The Company has elected the transition option to apply the new guidance at the effective date without adjusting comparative periods presented. Adoption of the ASU on January 1, 2019 had no material impact to the Company’s financial statements as the Company has no long term leases.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07 Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The update involves simplification of several aspects of accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of Topic 718 to include nonemployee awards. The update was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this update as of January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The update removes, modifies and makes additions to certain disclosure requirements with respect to fair value measurements. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of this update on fair value measurement disclosures.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 3 – FORWARD GOLD SALES CONTRACT LIABILITY

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company entered into and closed a Pre-Paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with PDK Utah Holdings L.P. (“PDK”) for the sale and purchase by PDK of gold produced from the Company’s mining property. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, PDK agreed to purchase a total of 73,910 ounces of gold from the Company at a reduced market price. Prepayment will be made in three tranches, with the initial tranche in the amount of $11,200,000 having been made upon execution of the Purchase Agreement on March 7, 2019 (the “Initial Funding”), $4,500,000 for Tranche 2 to occur at least six months following the Initial Funding date, and $5,500,000 for Tranche 3 to occur at least 10 months following the Initial Funding date, provided that all conditions precedent for funding Tranches 2 and 3 are met. From the Initial Funding, the Company paid an additional 300,000 shares.upfront fee of $600,000 to PDK for expenses incurred in connection with the transaction. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to sell gold at a reduced market price in certain quantities during agreed periods following prepayment of each tranche. The first gold delivery of 655 ounces is due December 2020.

The Purchase Agreement contains provisions requiring the Company to pay PDK a portion of the proceeds when gold is sold to a third party. In addition, PDK may reduce the required number of ounces to be sold in exchange for common shares of the Company. As security for the obligations of the Company under the Purchase Agreement, the Company has granted PDK a security interest in all of the assets of the Company and has issued and recorded a Leasehold Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases, Rents, As Extracted Collateral and Contracts, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing. The Purchase Agreement contains representations and warranties, as well as affirmative and negative covenants customary to a transaction of this nature.

The forward gold sales contract liability due under the terms of the Purchase Agreement at June 30, 2019 is $10,600,000 which is the $11,200,000 received from PDK in the initial tranche less the $600,000 upfront fee paid by the Company. On October 31, 2019, the Purchase Agreement was amended to reduce the number of gold ounces to be delivered and the amount of funding to be received in Tranches 2 and 3 (Note 20).

F-8

NOTE 4 – RECLAMATION BONDS

At September 30, 2010,2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had incurred $78,000has a surety bond of $674,000 in an escrow account with the bonding company for reclamation of its property. This escrowed amount is held at Bank of New York, Mellon for the Company’s benefit. It may not be released to the Company without the prior consent of the surety bondholder. The escrowed amount does not earn interest.


In March 2019, as part of the Amended Lease (Note 7), the Company returned the Cactus Mill property and the reclamation bond of $42,802 on that property to Clifton Mining Company.

Total reclamation bonds posted at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are $724,433 and $753,290, respectively, which consists of the above escrowed amount along with certificate of deposits held with the state of Utah for the remaining bonds on the property, including exploration bonds.

NOTE 5 – INVENTORIES

Inventories at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 consists of the following:

  September 30,
2019
  December 31,
2018
 
Ore on leach pad $2,756,624  $1,193,341 
Carbon column in process  88,372   - 
Finished goods  6,741   - 
Total  2,851,737   1,193,341 
Less: current portion  (2,851,737)  (1,193,341)
Non-current inventories $-  $- 

Inventories at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were valued at net realizable value because inventory-related costs were greater than the amount the Company expects to receive on the sale of the estimated gold ounces contained in inventories at both period-end dates.

NOTE 7 -6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT


Property and equipment are stated at cost.  Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The useful lives of property, plant and equipment for purposes of computing depreciation are five to seven years.

The following is a summary of property and equipment at September 30, 2019 and accumulated depreciation:


  September 30, 2010  
December 31,
2009
 
Equipment $227,283  $23,711 
Furniture and fixtures  10,005   - 
Vehicles  23,517   - 
Less accumulated depreciation  (17,243)  (7,104)
  $243,562  $16,607 

Depreciation andDecember 31, 2018:

  September 30,  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Equipment $4,563,395  $3,093,690 
Furniture and fixtures  6,981   6,981 
Electronic and computer equipment  50,587   52,874 
Vehicles  211,005   108,089 
Land improvements  44,840   - 
Land  250,000   - 
   5,126,808   3,261,634 
Less accumulated depreciation  (2,069,019)  (1,856,149)
   3,057,789   1,405,485 
         
Kiewit property facilities  2,497,436   2,497,436 
Less accumulated amortization  (531,638)  (487,214)
   1,965,798   2,010,222 
         
Total $5,023,587  $3,415,707 

For the Kiewit property facilities, amortization expense is based on units of production. Amortization based on total units of production, plus an adjustment in total expected ounces expected to be produced from the facilities, resulted in an amortization adjustment of $123,506 and $83,965 for the periodthree and nine months ended September 30, 20102019, respectively. There was $10,139.  The Company evaluates no amortization in the recoverability of propertythree and equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired.  The Company determines impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts.  Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.


Replacements and betterments are capitalized.  The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of operations.

NOTE 8 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES

In March 2010, the Company received 20,000 shares of restricted common stock of Boyuan Construction Company.  These shares were valued at $40,000 and had originally been recorded as a receivable at December 31, 2009 for this same value.  During the periodnine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company sold 9,800 of these shares for gross proceeds of $19,973, with selling commissions and fees of $683, for net proceeds2018 due to the Companylack of $19,290.

NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS

During the year ended December 31, 2009production.

On June 13, 2019, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement withan agreement whereby the Moeller Family TrustCompany acquired 20 claims adjacent to the Kiewit property from Ben Julian, LLC for the leasing of the Trust’s Yellow Hammer property in the Gold Hill Mining District of Utah.  In June 2010 the parties entered into an Amended$250,000.

F-9

NOTE 7 – MINERAL PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS

Mineral properties and Restated Lease Agreement effectiveinterests as of the date of the original Joint Venture Agreement.  The Amended and Restated Lease Agreement restated and replaced the original Joint Venture Agreement.  Under the restated agreement the Family Trust granted the Company exclusive leasehold interests in the mining claims covered by the original agreement.  Pursuant to the original agreement, Moeller Family Trust received 250,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock.  Under the terms of the amended agreement, the Company will be required to pay a 6% net smelter royalty on the production of base metals and a net smelter royalty on gold and silver based on a sliding scale of between 2% and 15% based on the price of gold and silver, as applicable.  Additionally, if the Company does not place the Yellow Hammer property into commercial production within a three year period it will be required to make annual payments to the Trust of $50,000.

10

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 20102019 and 2009
Also during the year ended December 31, 2018 are as follows: 

  September 30,
2019
  December 31,
2018
 
       
Kiewit and all other sites $3,700,000  $600,000 
Less accumulated amortization  (201,215)  (36,948)
   3,498,785   563,052 
         
Asset retirement obligation        
Kiewit Site  452,193   452,193 
Kiewit Exploration  11,126   11,126 
Cactus Mill  -   26,234 
Total  463,319   489,553 
Less accumulated amortization  (191,622)  (173,604)
   271,697   315,949 
         
Total $3,770,482  $879,001 

In 2009, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the Clifton Mining Company (“Clifton”) and the Woodman Mining Company for the leasinglease of their property interests in the Gold Hill Mining District of Utah. In June 2010March 2019, the partiesCompany and Clifton entered into ana Second Amended and Restated Lease and Sublease Agreement effective as(the “Amended Lease”).   Under the terms of this Amended Lease, the Company relinquished its leasehold interest in all but 10 of the datepatented mining claims, for which it retained only the surface rights, and 66 of the original Joint Venture Agreement.unpatented lode mining claims previously held by the Company. The Amended and Restated Lease and Sublease Agreement restated and replaced the original Joint Venture Agreement.  Under the restated agreementCactus Mill property was returned to Clifton Mining and Woodman Mining grantedCompany as part of this agreement.

As consideration for entering into the Amended Lease, the Company exclusive leasehold interests in the mining claims covered by the original agreement.  Pursuantissued 5,500,000 shares of its common stock with a fair value of $2,200,000 which was added to the original agreement, Clifton received 500,000 sharescarrying value of the mineral properties and interests. In addition, the Company and Clifton entered into a Registration Rights Agreement to register for resale the shares issued to Clifton which requires the Company to register the shares within 18 months following the Initial Funding. In the event the Company does not register the shares within the 18-month period, the Company is obligated to pay Clifton a royalty equal to 2.5% of the net smelter returns from the minerals generated from the Company’s restricted stock.  mining claims.

Under the terms of the amended agreement,initial Joint Venture Agreement, the Company will bewas required to pay a 4% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) on base metals in all other areas except for production from the Kiewit gold property and a net smelter royaltyNSR on gold and silver, except for production from the Kiewit gold property, based on a sliding scale of between 2% and 15% based on the price of gold or silver, as applicable.  The Company willwas also be required to pay Clifton a 6% net smelter returnNSR on any production from the Kiewit gold property.  Additionally, if

As part of the Purchase Agreement (Note 3) finalized in March 2019, these NSRs were bought out by the Company does not placefrom Clifton and two other minority royalty holders at a cost of $900,000 which was added to the carrying value of the mineral properties and interests. The buyer of the Purchase Agreement (Note 3), PDK, acquired a 4% NSR, previously held by Clifton, on the Kiewit Clifton Shears/smelter tunnel deposit,property for $2,200,000. A 4% NSR on any production from the Kiewit gold property is now due to PDK.

Amortization of the mineral properties and interests is based on units of production. Amortization based on total units of production, plus an adjustment in total expected ounces expected to be produced from the facilities, resulted in amortization expense of $170,959 and $184,837 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. There was no amortization in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 due to lack of production.

NOTE 8 – SHORT-TERM NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTIES

During 2018 and the Cane Springs deposit into commercial production within a three year period, it will be required to make annual payments to Clifton in the amountfirst quarter of $50,000 per location.


In September 2009, the Company acquired all of the rights and interests of Clifton Mining in a $38,000 reclamation
contract and a $3,777 cash surety deposit with the State of Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for the property covered by the joint venture.  As consideration for Clifton Mining selling its interest in the reclamation contract and surety deposit, the Company issued 60,824 shares to Clifton Mining.  For a period of two years the Company has the right to repurchase the shares for $48,000, or during the 180-day period after this two year period, Clifton Mining will have the option to put the shares to the Company for $48,000.

In connection with the issuance of this put option, management concluded that the 60,824 shares should be recorded as a derivative liability, and not as equity. The Company has used the Black-Scholls pricing model to value the put option. The following assumptions were used: stock price of $0.70, strike price of $0.79, volatility of 117% (based on similar companies volatility), and risk free interest rate of 4.35%. This resulted in the Company recording a derivative liability of $26,396.

The amended and restated agreements with Clifton Mining Company and Woodman Mining Company and with the Moeller Family Trust are effective as of the date of the original agreements and the term of the restated agreements is for 20 years from the date of the original agreements.  The restated agreements also permit the Company to mortgage or pledge the leasehold interests acquired under the agreements for the purpose of financing exploration, development, and mining operations on the properties.  The leasing parties also agreed to be responsible for any liability arising under certain potential encumbrances to the mining claims and to indemnify the Company and its affiliates against the loss of leasehold title or other actual losses or expenses from the potential encumbrances.  All other material terms of the original agreements are preserved in the restated agreements.

In September 2010,2019, the Company entered into employment agreementsseveral short-term notes payable with its Chief Executive Officerthe convertible debt holders (Note 9) and its Presidentwith the Company’s president. Total borrowed was $91,680 during the first quarter 2019 and entered into$249,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018. The notes bore interest at 10%, had a consulting agreement with one2% loan initiation fee, and were due in full on March 31, 2019. Accrued interest payable to related parties on these notes at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was nil and $7,243. Interest expense recognized on these loans was nil and $5,820 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. No interest expense was recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

These short-term notes were repaid in full, including 10% interest and a 2% loan initiation fee, in March 2019 as part of the terms of the Purchase Agreement.

F-10

NOTE 9 – CONVERTIBLE DEBT – RELATED PARTIES

2009 Convertible Notes:

On November 18, 2009, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to two of its directors.  Each agreement is for an initial term of four years and providesminority shareholders, for a base salary or feestotal of $120,000$600,000. The notes bore interest at 15% per year.


annum. Interest-only was payable in equal monthly installments of $7,500. The notes were convertible at a rate of $0.70 per share.

The Company failed to repay the notes in full on the November 30, 2012 through the 2017 maturity dates, so the Company was required to issue an additional 300,000 shares of common stock to these debt holders in each of those years. In 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, the annual issuance of shares of common stock was valued at an estimated $0.04 (total $12,000) each and was accounted for as financing expense.

The Company failed to repay the notes on the November 2018 maturity date. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued shares of common stock valued at $0.40 per share based on the cash price of common stock sales during 2018 which was recognized as financing expense. The due date of the note was extended to May 31, 2019. Interest had not been paid since November 2014. Per the terms of the notes, interest on these notes is not convertible to common stock.

On February 28, 2018, the notes were amended changing the interest rate from 15% to 10% effective March 1, 2018 and allowing for accrued interest to be payable in full on May 31, 2019. The amendment further waived the default provision in the notes for past due interest. In addition, as part of the agreement, the convertible feature of the notes was removed.

2016 Convertible Notes:

On October 14, 2016, the Company issued additional convertible promissory notes to the convertible debt holders for a total of $250,000. The notes bore interest at 10% per annum and were due in full on September 30, 2018. The notes were convertible at a rate of $0.25 per share. These notes were amended in February 2018 to extend the due date of the notes and the accrued interest to May 31, 2019. Interest on these notes is convertible to common stock.

2017 Convertible Notes:

On August 7, 2017, the convertible debt holders agreed to fund up to an additional aggregate of $500,000 under terms similar to existing convertible debt agreements. At December 31, 2017, $428,000 of these funds had been advanced. The remaining $72,000 was advanced in 2018 with the final advance on February 9, 2018. On February 28, 2018, these notes were amended to postpone the maturity date and interest payment date to May 31, 2019.

Accrued interest payable to related parties on the above convertible notes payable was nil and $456,750 at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Interest expense recognized on these loans was nil and $34,027for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively and nil and $105,287 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively.

All of these notes were paid in full, including accrued interest, on March 7, 2019 with funds received under the Purchase Agreement.

NOTE 10 – DMRJ GROUP FUNDINGOBLIGATION UNDER CAPITAL LEASE — RELATED PARTY

A capital lease was entered into on June 20, 2016 with RMH Overhead, LLC for mining and crushing equipment valued at $185,618, some of which had been previously owned by the Company. RMH Overhead, LLC is an entity owned by the Company’s president, Rick Havenstrite. The equipment is being amortized over the estimated useful life of the equipment. Accumulated amortization at December 31, 2018 was $66,292.

Lease payments were paid in full, including accrued interest and late fees, in March 2019 with funds received under the Purchase Agreement.

F-11


On

NOTE 11 – NOTES PAYABLE – EQUIPMENT

The following is a summary of the equipment notes payable:

  September 30,
2019
  December 31,
2018
 
Note payable to Komatsu Financial, collateralized by a Komatsu Telehandler lift, due in 48 monthly installments of $2,441 including interest at 4.99%. $-  $27,192 
         
Note payable to CAT Financial, collateralized by used mining equipment due in 36 monthly installments of varying amounts including interest at 4.68%.  -   117,002 
         
Note payable to Wheeler Machinery, collateralized by used crushing equipment, due in 9 monthly installments of $39,009.  -   145,066 
         
Note payable to Komatsu Financial, collateralized by a Komatsu D275 dozer, due in one monthly installment of $21,000 and 47 monthly installments of $11,674 including interest at 2.99%.  -   34,851 
         
Note payable to Wheeler Machinery, collateralized by a used Metso C3054 Jaw Crusher, due in 5 monthly installments of $45,000, beginning June 2019, including interest at 8%.  44,702   - 
         
Note payable to Wheeler Machinery, collateralized by a used CAT 740 Haul truck, due in 11 monthly installments of $14,475, beginning May 2019, including interest at 8%, with a balloon payment due in April 2020 of $168,873.  245,631   - 
         
Note payable to Wheeler Machinery, collateralized by a used D8T dozer, due in 11 monthly payments of $19,125, beginning August 2019, including interest at 10%, with a balloon payment due in July 2020 of $350,281.  488,778   - 
         
Note payable to Komatsu Equipment, collateralized by a used PC490 Excavator, due in 11 monthly payments of $10,320, beginning July 2019, including interest at 9%, with a balloon payment due in March 2020 of $71,372.  118,702   - 
   897,813   324,111 
Current portion  (897,813)  (324,111)
Long term portion $-  $- 
         
Principal payments are as follows for the twelve months ended September 30, 2020 $897,813     

All of the above notes with balances due at December 31, 2018 were paid in full in March 2019 with funds received under the Purchase Agreement.

NOTE 12 – NOTE PAYABLE — DMRJ

In July 14, 2010, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with DMRJ. The Agreement had been modified numerous times and operated under theFourteenthAmendment to the Investment Agreement dated December 22, 2016. The Amendments provided for extensions of payment dates, increased funding capacity and other modifications to the debt agreement. At December 31, 2017, DMRJ Group I, LLC,beneficially owned approximately 77% of the Company (on a Delaware limited liability company.fully diluted basis) with Series A, A-2 and B preferred stock shares convertible to 47,211,002 shares of common stock (See Note 15).

In the third quarter of 2016, control of the management of DMRJ was given to court appointed trustees of the two major funds of Platinum Partners. On March 8, 2018, the Company finalized an agreement with the trustees to discharge all of the amounts owed by the Company to DMRJ and to extinguish all of DMRJ’s shares of the Company’s preferred stock in exchange for $625,000. On the date of the agreement, the principal balance of the note was $15,554,552 and accrued interest payable was $9,987,009 for a total balance due of $25,541,561. As a result of the transaction, in the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $24,916,561.

All of the preferred stock of the Company that had been issued to DMRJ in prior years was extinguished. The preferred stock was originally recorded for a total value $4,068,720. As a result of the extinguishment, the Company adjusted accumulated deficit for the value of the preferred stock. This amount is considered a capital contribution and has been added to net income attributable to common stockholders in the calculation of earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.


After the above transactions, DMRJ is no longer a shareholder (beneficially or otherwise) of the Company as of March 8, 2018.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the existing convertible debt holders funded the $625,000 and modifications to their existing convertible note terms were made in exchange for 4,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. See Notes 9 and 15.

NOTE 13 –ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

Changes in the asset retirement obligation for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

  September 30,
2019
  September 30,
2018
 
Asset retirement obligation, beginning of period $792,747  $1,046,621 
Reduction in liability due to transfer of Cactus Mill property  (40,802)  - 
Accretion expense  56,019   18,128 
Asset retirement obligation, end of period $807,964  $1,064,749 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Cactus Mill property was returned to Clifton as part of the terms of the Amended Lease (Note 7). The net asset retirement cost of $20,351 and obligation of $40,802 relating to the Cactus Mill property were eliminated resulting in a gain on settlement of asset retirement obligation of $20,451 recognized in the statement of operations.

NOTE 14 – SETTLEMENT OF CONSULTING CONTRACT

On March 29, 2018, the Company entered into a five-year Agency Agreement (the “Agency Agreement”) with H&H Metals Corp., a New York corporation (“H&H”). Under the terms of the agreement, DMRJ Group has committedAgency Agreement, H&H agreed to loanprovide certain advisory services in regard to natural resources activities and to assist in securing purchasers for minerals produced from its mining properties.

On January 16, 2019, as a condition for entering into the Purchase Agreement (Note 3), the Company upnegotiated a termination of the Agency Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with H&H. Under the terms of the Termination Agreement, the Company paid H&H $600,000 in cash and agreed to $6,500,000pay an additional $200,000 within 18 months. The Company also issued 250,000 shares of its common stock with a fair value of $100,000 to H&H. In addition, Phillip H. Holme, a principal of H&H, became a director of the Company.

The Company recognized a loss on settlement of consulting contract of $900,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2019. The balance of $200,000 is due under certain termsthe settlement agreement at September 30, 2019.

NOTE 15 – CAPITAL STOCK

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock. All shares have equal voting rights and conditions.  Each loan advance made byhave one vote per share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company.

2019 Activity

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2019, the Company had the following transactions relating to common stock. All shares issued were valued at $0.40 per share based on the most recent sale of common stock for cash:

Issued 5,500,000 shares of common stock to Clifton in connection with the Amended Lease (Note 7). The fair value of these shares was $2,200,000.

Issued 250,000 shares of common stock to H&H in connection with settlement of a consulting contract (Note 14). The fair value of these shares was $100,000.

In connection with the settlement of stock redeemable with gold proceeds issued in 2012, the Company allowed investors to retain 130,000 shares of common stock that had been issued in connection with a financing in 2012 (Note 19). The fair value of these shares was $52,000.

F-13

2018 Activity

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2018, the Company had the following transactions relating to common stock:

Sold 4,500,000 shares of common stock to the convertible debt holders for $625,000 in cash and several concessions as to the convertibility, due dates and default provisions on their outstanding debt. See Note 9.

Sold 2,125,000 shares of its common stock at $0.40 per share for cash proceeds of $850,000.

Preferred Stock

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorized 10,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value Preferred Stock available for issuance with such rights and preferences, including liquidation, dividend, conversion, and voting rights, as the Board of Directors may determine.

On March 8, 2018, the Company finalized an agreement with the trustees of DMRJ, Group is evidenced by a promissory note due not later than July 14, 2012.  These loan advances can only be usedwho owned all of the Series A, A-2 and Series B outstanding preferred stock. This agreement discharged all of the debt owed by the Company to pay transaction feesDMRJ and expenses incurred in connection withits related affiliates and returned all of the loan transaction, to purchase certain mining equipment, and as working capital to advance our Yellow Hammer and Kiewit mining activities.  The maximum amounts allocableshares of preferred stock to the Yellow Hammer and Kiewit projects are $2,500,000 and $2,750,000, respectively, and are subject to meeting certain milestones on the projects.Company in exchange for $625,000. The last two advances of $500,000 each with respect to the Yellow Hammer project are conditioned upon the Company’s ability to commence the mining of copper from the project and production of at least 400,000 pounds of copper concentrate from our ore processing operations at the Cactus Mill site.  Advances for operations on the Kiewit project are conditioned upon the Company’s ability to obtain and maintainCompany then cancelled all environmental and mining permits necessary to commence mining activities and the timely payment of the initial Yellow Hammer advances forpreferred shares of stock. As a result, DMRJ relinquished all ownership in the month of February 2011.  Company. See Note 12.

NOTE 16 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In addition to transactions disclosed in Notes 8, 9, 10 and 19, the Company had the following related party transaction.

The Company has requesteda month to month lease agreement for its office space with RMH Overhead, LLC, a company owned by Rick Havenstrite, the Company’s President and a director. The Company recognized rent expense of $3,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, under this lease. The Company recognized rent expense of $9,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, under this lease. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, amounts due to RMH Overhead, LLC of nil and $18,750, respectively, are included in in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the balance sheet.

NOTE 17 – REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company’s product consists of an unrefined gold concentrate, which is then refined offsite to become doré. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company had sales of gold concentrate in the amount of $103,195, all of which sold through Asahi Refining. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company had gold concentrate sales of $195,574, all of which sold to H&H Metals Corp. Revenue is recognized upon the completion of the performance obligations and transfer of control of the product to the customer, and when the transaction price can be determined or reasonably estimated.

Sales and accounts receivable for sales are recorded net of charges for treatment and other charges which represent components of the transaction price. Charges are estimated by management upon transfer of risk based on contractual terms, and actual charges typically do not vary materially from management’s estimates. Revenue from the sale of metals may be subject to adjustment upon final settlement of estimated metal prices, weights and assays, and are recorded as adjustments to revenue in the period of final settlement of prices, weights and assays; such adjustments are typically not material in relation to the initial invoice amounts. Costs charged by the refiner include fixed treatment, refining and costs per ton of concentrate and may include penalty charges for other metal content above a negotiated baseline as well as excessive moisture.

Management has determined the performance obligation is met and title is transferred when the Company delivers the concentrate to the customer because, at that time, (i) legal title is transferred to the customer, (ii) the customer has accepted the concentrate lot and obtained the ability to realize all of the benefits from the product, (iii) the concentrate content specifications are known, have been communicated to the customer, and the customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership to it, and (iv) the Company has the right to payment for the concentrate. The performance obligation is met, the transaction price is known, and revenue is recognized at the time of transfer of control of the agreed-upon metal quantities to the customer.

Product sales for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 are shown below. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not have a gold sales receivable balance.

  Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2019  2018  2019  2018 
Gold $119,200  $211,812  $119,200   211,812 
Silver (by-product)  970   2,715   970   2,715 
Less: Royalties, refining charges, and sales costs  (16,975)  (18,953)  (16,975)  (18,953)
Total $103,195  $195,574  $103,195  $195,574 

F-14

NOTE 18 – STOCK OPTIONS

The Company has reserved 2,400,000 shares under its 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan was adopted by the board of directors on March 28, 2018, retroactive to February 23, 2018, as a vehicle for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees, officers, directors, consultants, and other service providers. The Plan is administered by the Board of Directors. The Company may issue, to eligible persons, restricted common stock, incentive and non-statutory options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units. The terms and conditions of awards under the Plan will be determined by the Board of Directors.

On February 23, 2018, the Board approved the grant of an aggregate of 2,400,000 non-statutory options under the 2018 Plan exercisable at $0.40 per share which expire February 23, 2023 in the amounts and to the following:

Rick Havenstrite, President and CEO – 1,000,000 options

Howard Crosby, Director – 1,000,000 options

John Ryan, Director – 200,000 options

Linde Havenstrite, Project Engineer – 200,000 options

The options were fully vested on the date of grant. The fair value of the options, calculated using the Black Scholes model, of $456,000 was recognized as stock based compensation cost for the nine month period ended September 30, 2018, which was included in general and administrative expenses.

Outstanding options at September 30, 2019 are 2,400,000, have a remaining life of 3.3 years, and had no intrinsic value. No options were granted, expired, or were exercised during the three-month period ended September 30, 2019.

NOTE 19 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In addition to commitments disclosed in Notes 3 and 7, the Company had the following commitments and contingencies.

Personal property tax and other accrued liabilities

Personal property tax for Tooele County, Utah, is billed and becomes due on November 30 of each year. At September 30, 2019, the amount due to Tooele County is nil. At December 31, 2018, the balance due for these taxes was $134,687 which included delinquent taxes from prior years. The balance was paid in full in March 2019 with funds received under the Purchase Agreement.

Employment Agreements

The Company has an employment agreement with Mr. Havenstrite as President of the Company, which is ongoing. The agreement, as amended, requires Mr. Havenstrite to meet certain time requirements and limits the number of other board member obligations in which he can participate. The agreement allows for a base annual salary of $144,000 plus certain performance compensation upon fulfillment of established goals. The agreement allows the board of directors to terminate Mr. Havenstrite’s employment at any time, providing for a severance payment upon termination without cause.

Beginning in 2019, the Company’s board of directors agreed to compensate directors for their contributions to the management of the Company, with one director receiving $6,000 per month and the other two loan advances from DMRJ Groupdirectors receiving $5,000 per quarter.

At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, accrued compensation of nil and $828,039, were due to officers of the Company. Of the amounts accrued at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, accrued compensation of nil and $593,232 is due to Rick Havenstrite and nil and $234,807 is due to Marianne Havenstrite, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer. In addition, nil and $94,000 was due to directors at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The amounts due at December 31, 2018 were paid in full in March 2019 with funds received under the Purchase Agreement.

Finder’s Agreement

On May 11, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Mount Royal Consultants (Mount Royal) to assist in finding prospective investors. Mount Royal would receive a finder’s fee of 7% for $500,000 each, plus $88,235 each in prepaid interest paid to DMRJ Group.

Ina connection with this agreement,a company that resulted in a qualified investment consisting of equity securities or a fee of 3% for a connection with a company that resulted in a purchase of debt securities. On March 7, 2019, the Company closed a Purchase Agreement (Note 3) to a buyer for the purchase of gold produced from the Company’s mining property. This agreement was deemed to be subject to the finder’s fee and resulted in a payment to Mount Royal of $318,000, 3% of the $10,600,000 beneficially received by the Company in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement. On November 1, 2019, an additional payment of 3% of the Tranche 2 payment received by the Company resulted in a payment of $48,000 to Mount Royal and a third payment of $42,000 was issued 958,033after receipt of the Tranche 3 payment on December 27, 2019. Future amounts to be received from investors could also be subject to this agreement. During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019, the Company recognized nil and $318,000, respectively, as consulting expense relating to this agreement.


Stock Redeemable with Gold Proceeds

In 2012, the Company sold 130,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock.  Thecommon stock.  Under the terms of this issuance have been detailed in Note 3 – Capital Stock.

11

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Foroffering, the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
Each advance amount bears interest of 15% per annumshares could be redeemed for cash generated from the datesale of borrowing.  The Company is requiredgold. Each investor received the right to prepay interest on any advance that would accrue duringconvert a minimum of one-half and up to all of his shares (on a pro rata basis) into the first year followingvalue of the advance, ornumber of ounces represented by the total investment, determined using a shorter period if the advance is less than one year priorbase price of $1,000 per ounce.  Due to the maturity dateredemption feature of these shares, the shares were recorded as a liability and not as equity.

All investors opted to convert their shares for cash from 5% of the promissory note.  This prepayment of interest is nonrefundable even ifgold sales.  At December 31, 2018, the Company prepays the advance.  Following this one-year period interest on the advance ishad a payable monthly until the advance is repaidof $151,405 to investors for their portion of gold sales included in full.  In addition, at the time the Company repays or prepays the advance, it is required to pay an additional amount equal to 20% of the principal amount being repaid or prepaid.  Upon an event of default, the interest rate on the outstanding principal amount increases to 25%.


Loan advances made for the Yellow Hammer and Kiewit projects are subject to mandatory prepayments by the Company.  Yellow Hammer advances must be repaid, together with prepayment interest and any outstanding monthly interest, commencing on or before the fifth business day of the month beginning February 2011 and each month thereafter through September 2011.  Kiewit advances must be repaid, together with prepayment interest and any outstanding monthly interest, beginning month seven after the initial advance on this project through month twelve.

Pursuant to a Security Agreement dated July 14, 2010, the Company has secured repayment of any advances made by DMRJ Group with all of its assets, including its shares of Blue Fin Capital, Inc., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, which shares have been pledged as collateral for the advances pursuant to a Pledge Agreement dated July 14, 2010.  As the secured party, DMRJ Group is appointed as attorney in fact to foreclose on and deal with the Company’s assets in the event of default.

In connection with the loan transaction, two of the Company’s prior lenders, each of whom had loaned $300,000accounts payable. This balance was paid to the Company on November 18, 2009, agreed to subordinate their debt to DMRJ Group.  In consideration for their agreement to subordinate their loans,investors in March 2019 fully satisfying the Company reduced the conversion price of the loans from $1.50 to $0.70 per share.  All other material terms of the loans remain unchanged.  On July 14, 2010,original offering. Upon full satisfaction of the redemption provisions, the shares of common stock should have been returned to the Company. However, the Company issued amended and restated promissory notesallowed the investors to keep the lenders reflectingshares. The Company recognized an expense of $63,094, which includes $52,000 for the reduced conversion price and acknowledging the subordination to the DMRJ Group financing.
NOTE 11 – RESTATEMENT

The balance sheet for September 30, 2010 has been restated to reclassify the derivative liability associated with the issuancefair value of the Series A Preferred Stock previously reported at $669,644 to permanent equity. The Company has determined that it did not meetshares of common stock, as loss on settlement of redeemable stock during the requirements of a derivative liability based on ASC Topic 815-15-25

quarter ended March 31, 2019.

Mining Leases

Annual claims fees are currently $155 per claim plus administrative fees.

NOTE 1220 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


Amendment of Forward Gold Sales Contract (Purchase Agreement)

On November 4, 2010, the Company received an additional loan advance from DMRJ Group I, LLC in the amount of $588,236.


In November 2010October 31, 2019, the Company and DMRJ Group I, LLCPDK amended the InvestmentPurchase Agreement and entered into the Amended Pre-Paid Forward Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) to eliminateadjust the requirementsecond and third tranches paid to produce 400,000 poundsthe Company, to reduce the total number of copper concentrateounces of gold subject to the Purchase Agreement, and to revise other provisions therein. The second tranche was reduced from $4,500,000 to $1,600,000, and the third tranche was reduced from $5,500,000 to $1,400,000. The second tranche was received on October 31, 2019 upon execution of the Amended Agreement and the third tranche was received on December 27, 2019, with funds to be dedicated in orderaccordance with the revised budget furnished with the Amended Agreement. The amendment also reduced the total number of ounces of gold prepaid under the agreement from 73,910 to receive47,045.

Under the final two loan advancesterms of the Amended Agreement, the Company is obligated to deliver gold in the following quantities following prepayment of each tranche:

Beginning the 21st calendar month following the Initial Funding, 655 ounces of gold per month for each of the four calendar months thereafter, 670 ounces for each the 12 calendar months thereafter, 1,155 ounces for each of the 12 calendar months thereafter, and 1,512 ounces of gold for each of the 9 calendar months thereafter.

Beginning the 14th Calendar month following the Tranche 2 funding, 129 ounces of gold per month for each of the 37 calendar months thereafter.

Beginning the 13th Calendar month following the Tranche 3 funding, 112 ounces of gold per month for each of the 37 calendar months thereafter.

The Amended Agreement also alters the total amount that PDK may reduce the number of ounces of gold to be delivered under the Amended Agreement in exchange for common shares of the Company. Under the Amended Agreement, PDK may reduce the required number of ounces by up to 8,000 ounces in exchange for common shares of the Company.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the shareholders and the board of directors of Desert Hawk Gold Corp

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Desert Hawk Gold Corp (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has historical net losses from operations and negative cash flows from operations. At December 31, 2018, accumulated deficit is $5,674,925. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the Yellow Hammer project or to avoidpurpose of expressing an event of default if this amount was not produced by mid-December 2010.


The Company commenced operationopinion on the effectiveness of the Cactus Mill pilot plantCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in November 2010.the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/DeCoria, Maichel & Teague, P.S.

DeCoria, Maichel & Teague, P.S.

We have served as the Company’s independent auditor since 2011.

Spokane, Washington

July 24, 2019


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

BALANCE SHEETS

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
ASSETS    Revised 
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $8,716  $4,212 
Inventories, current (Note 6)  1,193,341   371,778 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  40,475   102,251 
Total Current Assets  1,242,532   478,241 
         
INVENTORIES, non-current, (Note 6)  -   1,686,592 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net (Note 7)  3,415,707   3,621,436 
MINERAL PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS, net (Note 8)  879,001   1,205,387 
RECLAMATION BONDS (Note 5)  753,290   753,054 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $6,290,530  $7,744,710 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $652,895  $679,580 
Accrued liabilities - officer and other wages (Notes 7 and 19)  922,039   709,577 
Interest payable - related parties (Note 9 and 10)  463,993   317,436 
Short-term notes payable - related parties (Note 10)  249,000   - 
Convertible debt - related parties (Note 9)  1,350,000   1,278,000 
Obligation under capital lease - related party (Note 11)  69,562   84,110 
Notes payable - equipment, current portion (Note 12)  324,111   452,214 
Note and interests payable - DMRJ (Note 13)  -   625,000 
Total Current Liabilities  4,031,600   4,145,917 
         
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES        
Asset retirement obligation (Note 14)  792,747   1,046,621 
Note and interest payable - DMRJ (Note 13)  -   24,464,670 
Notes payable - equipment (Note 12)  -   16,817 
   792,747   25,528,108 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES  4,824,347   29,674,025 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 8, 17, 18, 19 and 20)        
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Note 4)        
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized        
Series A:0 and 958,033 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  -   958 
Series A-1: No shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Series A-2: 0 and 180,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  -   180 
Series B: 0 and 444,530 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  -   444 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 20,881,603 and 13,956,603 shares issued or to be issued and outstanding, respectively (Note 4)  20,753   13,828 
Additional paid-in capital  7,120,355   9,143,418 
Accumulated deficit  (5,674,925)  (31,088,143)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)  1,466,183   (21,929,315)
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $6,290,530  $7,744,710 

The Company has evaluated subsequent events from the balance sheet date, September 30, 2010, through the dateaccompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements were issued and has determined that therestatements.


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
     Revised 
REVENUE      
Concentrate sales $248,344  $162,762 
         
EXPENSES        
General production costs  1,587,057   707,732 
Exploration expense  3,146   1,300 
Officers and directors fees  253,752   252,000 
Legal and professional  129,135   71,349 
General and administrative  685,925   241,744 
Depreciation and amortization  421,228   430,934 
   3,080,243   1,705,059 
         
OPERATING LOSS  (2,831,899)  (1,542,297)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Gain on extinguishment of DMRJ debt (Note 13)  24,916,561   - 
Interest and other income  236   167 
Interest and financing expense  (46,760)  (93,312)
Financing expense - related parties (Note 9)  (120,000)  - 
Interest expense - related parties (Notes 9 and 10)  (151,749)  (145,691)
Interest expense - DMRJ (Note 13)  (421,891)  (2,295,508)
   24,176,397   (2,534,344)
         
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES  21,344,498   (4,076,641)
INCOME TAXES  -   - 
         
NET INCOME ( LOSS) $21,344,498  $(4,076,641)
DEEMED CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF PREFERRED STOCK (NOTE 13)  4,068,720   - 
NET INCOME ( LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS $25,413,218  $(4,076,641)
         
BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $1.32  $(0.30)
DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $1.12  $(0.30)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING-BASIC  19,196,808   13,682,082 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING-DILUTED  22,654,411   13,682,082 

The accompanying notes are no additional events that would require disclosure inan integral part of these financial statements.


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

              Additional  Accumulated  Total Stockholders’ 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Paid-in  Deficit  Equity 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  (Revised)  (Deficit) 
                      
Balance, December 31, 2016  1,582,563  $1,582   13,656,603  $13,528  $9,131,718  $(27,011,502) $(17,864,674)
                             
Common stock issued in connection with extension of convertible debt (Note 4)  -   -   300,000   300   11,700   -   12,000 
                             
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (4,076,641)  (4,076,641)
                             
Balance, December 31, 2017  1,582,563   1,582   13,956,603   13,828   9,143,418   (31,088,143)  (21,929,315)
                             
Stock based compensation
(Note 18)
  -   -   -   -   456,000   -   456,000 
                             
Common stock issued for cash at $.40 per share  -   -   2,125,000   2,125   847,875   -   850,000 
                             
Extinguishment of preferred stock (Note 13)  (1,582,563)  (1,582)  -   -   (4,067,138)  4,068,720   - 
                             
Common stock issued to convertible debtholders in connection with extinguishment of DMRJ debt (Note 13)  -   -   4,500,000   4,500   620,500   -   625,000 
                             
Common stock issued in connection with extension of convertible debt (Note 4)  -   -   300,000   300   119,700   -   120,000 
                             
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   21,344,498   21,344,498 
                             
Balance, December 31, 2018  -  $-   20,881,603  $20,753  $7,120,355  $(5,674,925) $1,466,183 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

12

 

  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
     Revised 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net income (loss) $21,344,498  $(4,076,641)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  421,228   430,934 
Gain on extinguishment of DMRJ debt (Note 13)  (24,916,561)  - 
Stock based compensation  456,000   - 
Common stock issued for financing expense  120,000   12,000 
Accretion of asset retirement obligation  80,468   72,512 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Inventories  865,029   (111,997)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  61,776   30,496 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  96,795   (65,363)
Accrued liabilities - officer and other wages  212,462   213,769 
Interest payable - related parties  146,557   124,594 
Interest payable - DMRJ  451,891   2,295,508 
Net cash (used) by operating activities  (659,857)  (1,074,188)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Additions to property and equipment  (73,868)  (30,676)
Additions to reclamation bonds  (236)  (300)
Net cash (used) by investing activities  (74,104)  (30,976)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from sale of common stock  1,475,000   - 
Proceeds from short-term notes payable - related parties  249,000   - 
Proceeds from convertible debt - related parties  72,000   428,000 
Payment on note payable - DMRJ  (625,000)  944,060 
Payment of short term notes payable - related parties  -   (34,500)
Payment of notes payable - equipment  (417,987)  (798,063)
Payment of obligation under capital lease - related party  (14,548)  (88,065)
Net cash provided by financing activities  738,465   451,432 
         
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  4,504   (653,732)
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR  4,212   657,944 
         
CASH, END OF YEAR $8,716  $4,212 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION        
Cash paid for interest $46,760  $104,944 
NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIVES:        
Equipment acquired with notes payable - equipment (Note 12) $141,631  $- 
Accounts payable settled with notes payable - equipment (Note 12) $131,436   - 
Extinguishment of preferred stock (Note 13) $4,068,720  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


F-21

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

(Formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)


December 31, 2009 and 2008


Salt Lake Office:
    5296 South Commerce Drive, Suite 300    
Salt Lake City, Utah 84107-5370
Telephone: (801)281-4700
Kaysville Office:
1284 Flint Meadow Drive, Suite D
Kaysville, Utah 84037-9590
Telephone: (801)927-1337
Hong Kong Office:
Max Share Centre, 373 King’s Road
North Point, Hong Kong
Telephone: 852-21-555-333


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(Formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)

ConsolidatedNotes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2009 and 2008

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(Formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008


Table of Contents
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm2
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets3
Consolidated Statements of Operations4
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
6
Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements7 - 15


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors  Desert Hawk Gold Corp. 2719 W. Strong Way Spokane, WA 99208

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Desert Hawk Gold Corp. (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from May 1, 2009 (re-entry to exploration stage) to December 31, 2009.  These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to expressed an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from May 1, 2009 (re-entry to exploration stage) to December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered net losses since inception arising from its planned principal operations.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to meet its obligations and to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Since our previous report dated June 21, 2010, it was determined that the consolidated financial statements needed restatement to make corrections as described in Note 10.


Child, Van Wagoner & Bradshaw, PLLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
June 21, 2010, except for Notes 5 and 10, which are dated November 9, 2010



2

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(Formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
 (An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (restated)    
       
ASSETS 
 
    
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $888,434  $53,693 
Accounts receivable  12,334   - 
Other receivable - Boyuan stock  40,000   - 
Note receivable  -   40,000 
Deposits  500   - 
Prepaid expense  -   32,398 
Total Current Assets  941,268   126,091 
         
Property and equipment, net of depreciation of $7,104 and $0, respectively  16,607   - 
Mineral leases  775,000   - 
         
OTHER ASSETS        
Reclamation bonds  80,302   - 
Mining claims  2,485   - 
Total Other Assets  82,787     
TOTAL ASSETS $1,815,662  $126,091 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable $30,681  $4,315 
Accrued expense  16,149   - 
Accrued liabilities - officer wages  141,259   172,950 
Derivative liability  26,396    - 
Accrued interest  10,500   - 
Total Current Liabilities  224,985   177,265 
         
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $201,833 and $0, respectively  398,167   - 
TOTAL LIABILITIES  623,152   177,265 
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Common stock,  $0.001 par value, 100,000,000  shares authorized; 7,071,044 and 1,867,348 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  7,071   1,867 
Additional paid-in capital  2,688,224   931,525 
Accumulated deficit prior to exploration stage  (1,016,591)  (984,566)
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage  (486,194)  - 
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)  1,192,510   (51,174)
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) $1,789,266  $126,091 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(Formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
 (An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
  Year Ended December 31, 2009  Year Ended December 31, 2008  
Period from
May 1, 2009 (Inception of Exploration Stage) to
December 31, 2009
 
  (restated)     (restated) 
          
          
REVENUES $-  $-  $- 
             
EXPENSES            
Consulting  90,591   12,750   87,092 
Officers and directors fees  87,181   66,000   67,182 
Exploration expense  120,324   -   119,124 
Legal and professional  74,847   19,126   72,544 
General and administrative  153,170   27,936   145,100 
Depreciation  7,104   -   7,104 
Total Expenses  533,217   125,812   498,146 
             
OPERATING LOSS  (533,217)  (125,812)  (498,146)
             
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)            
Interest income  40,000   -   40,000 
Other income  12,334   -   12,334 
Gain on marketable securities  6,721   -   3,675 
Financing expense  (25,000)  -   (25,000)
Interest expense  (19,057)  -   (19,057)
Total Other Income (Expense)  14,998   -   11,952 
             
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES  (518,219)  (125,812)  (486,194)
             
INCOME TAXES  -   -   - 
             
NET LOSS $(518,219) $(125,812) $(486,194)
             
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE $(0.19) $(0.07)    
             
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING  2,781,359   1,743,564     

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(Formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
 (An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2009 (restated) 2018 and 20082017

   
Common Stock
  
Additional
  
Accumulated
Deficit prior to
  
Accumulated
Deficit during
  
Total
Stockholders'
 
  Shares  Amount  
Paid-in
Capital
  
Exploration
Stage
  
Exploration
Stage
  
Equity
(Deficit)
 
                   
Balance, December 31, 2007  1,544,433  $1,544  $741,498  $(858,754) $-  $(115,712)
Common stock issued for services at $0.033 per share  16,666   17   6,583   -   -   6,600 
Common stock issued for cash at $0.05 per share  289,583   289   173,461   -   -   173,750 
Common stock issued for services at $0.05 per share  16,666   17   9,983   -   -   10,000 
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   (125,812)  -   (125,812)
                         
Balance, December 31, 2008  1,867,348   1,867   931,525   (984,566)  -   (51,174)
Common stock issued for cash at $0.70 per share  1,436,300   1,436   1,003,974   -   -   1,005,410 
Common stock cancelled for services not performed  (107,064)  (107)  (32,291)  -   -   (32,398)
Common stock issued for mineral leases at $0.70 per share  750,000   750   524,250   -   -   525,000 
Common stock issued to acquire reclamation bond at $0.70 per share  60,824   61   16,345   -   -   16,406 
Common stock issued with convertible notes as financing incentive at $0.70 per share  300,000   300   209,700   -   -   210,000 
Common stock issued for wages at $0.70 per share  50,000   50   34,950   -   -   35,000 
Common stock issued to acquire subsidiary  2,713,636   2,714   (229)  -   -   2,485 
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   (32,025)  (486,194)  (518,219)
Balance, December 31, 2009  7,071,044  $7,071  $2,688,224  $(1,016,591) $(486,194) $1,192,510 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

(Formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
  Year Ended December 31, 2009  Year Ended December 31, 2008  
Period from
May 1, 2009
(Inception of Exploration Stage) to
December 31, 2009
 
  (restated)     (restated) 
  
 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:         
Net loss $(518,219) $(125,812) $(486,194)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:            
Depreciation  7,104   -   7,104 
Cancelation of common stock for services not performed  (32,397)  -   - 
Common stock issued for services and wages  35,000   16,600   35,000 
Accretion of debt discount  8,167   -   8,167 
Accrued interest income  (40,000)  -   (40,000)
Gain on sale of marketable securities  (6,721)  -   (3,675)
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Deposits  (500)  -   (500)
Accounts receivable  (12,334)  -   (12,334)
Prepaid expenses  32,397   -   - 
Accounts payable  26,366   4,314   27,507 
Accrued liabilities - officer wages  (31,691)  22,500   (30,691)
Accrued liabilities  16,149   -   16,149 
Accrued interest  10,500   -   10,500 
Net cash used by operating activities  (506,179)  (82,398)  (468,967)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Purchase of fixed assets  (23,711)  -   (23,711)
Purchase of mineral leases  (250,000)  -   (250,000)
Reclamation bond  (37,500)  -   (37,500)
Note receivable  40,000   (40,000)  27,500 
Investment in marketable securities  (10,000)  -   - 
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  16,721   -   10,055 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities  (264,490)  (40,000)  (273,656)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            
Proceeds from convertible notes payable  600,000   -   600,000 
Proceeds from sale of common stock  1,005,410   173,750   1,005,410 
Net cash provided by financing activities  1,605,410   173,750   1,605,410 
             
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  834,741   51,352   862,787 
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  53,693   2,341   25,647 
CASH, END OF PERIOD $888,434  $53,693  $888,434 
             
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:            
Interest paid $-  $-  $- 
Income taxes paid $-  $-  $- 
NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Common stock issued for mineral lease $525,000  $-  $525,000 
Common stock issued as incentive with convertible notes $210,000  $-  $210,000 
Common stock issued for reclamation bond $42,802  $-  $42,802 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
NOTE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Desert Hawk Gold Corp (the “Company”), a Nevada Corporation, was incorporated on November 5, 1957 in the State of Idaho as Lucky Joe Mining Company.  On July 17, 2008 the Company merged with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lucky Joe Mining Company, a Nevada corporation, for the sole purpose of effecting a change in domicile from the State of Idaho to the State of Nevada.  Lucky Joe Mining Company (Nevada) was the continuing and surviving corporation, each outstanding share of Lucky Joe Mining Company (Idaho) was converted into one outstanding share of Lucky Joe Mining Company (Nevada). On April 3, 2009, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the State of Nevada changing the name of the Company to Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

1957. The Company was originally incorporated to pursue the Mining business through the acquisition of prospectivecommenced its current mining claims in the Wallace and Kellogg mining districts of Northern Idaho.  The Company never successfully generated any revenue, or joint ventures from any of the activities it pursued and abandoned the mining business as a viable business model when the commodity prices cycled downward. Until it recommenced its mining activities, the Company was dormant. The Company is considered an exploration stage company and its financial statements are presented in a manner similar to a development stage company as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 7.   The Company entered the exploration stage on May 1, 2009.

On

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company acquired allentered into Joint Venture Agreements with the Clifton Mining Company, the Woodman Mining Company and the Moeller Family Trust for the lease of certain of their property interests in the Gold Hill Mining District of Utah. In 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with DMRJ Group, (a Platinum Partners related entity), which allowed for long term funding of the outstanding stockKiewit project and helped to provide cash flow for operations during the period from 2009 until 2014 while the permitting process was ongoing. The final permit needed to begin development of Blue Fin Capital, Inc.the Kiewit property was received in January 2014 and development began in February 2014. Construction at the site was substantially complete at September 30, 2014. Revenue from the heap leach operation began in October 2014 with the first sales of gold concentrate. Production commenced and revenues of approximately $7,200,000 from sales of gold and other metals concentrate have been received through December 31, 2018.

Ongoing undercapitalization has continued to hamper the Company’s ability to operate. Due to lack of funding, the Company has been temporarily shut down since third quarter of 2017. Subsequent to year end, on March 7, 2019, the Company successfully finalized a lending agreement with PDK Utah Holdings, LLC that enabled production to resume in 2019. See Note 20.

On March 8, 2018, the Company successfully finalized an agreement with the trustees of DMRJ Group (“Blue Fin”DMRJ”), a Utah corporation owning mining claims which eliminated the note and interest payable balance of $25,541,561 due to DMRJ in Arizona.  The Company issued a total of 2,713,636 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of Blue Finexchange for $625,000. In addition, all of the outstanding shares of Blue Fin.  Blue Finpreferred stock held by DMRJ were retired and cancelled. See Notes 4 and 13.

NOTE 2 – REVISION OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR IMMATERIAL MISSTATEMENTS

In November 2018, the Company determined inventory was acquired fromoverstated since the beginning of production in 2014 based on an error in estimating the gold ounces contained in the ore on the leach pad. The valuation of inventory requires management to develop estimates of recoverable gold on the leach pad. Factors considered in this estimate include quantities of material placed on the leach pad (measured tons added to the leach pad), the grade of material placed on the leach pad (based on assay data), and an estimated recovery percentage (based on ore type). The miscalculation was primarily due to usage of an incorrect bench height measurement which resulted in an overstatement of tonnage contained in the pit. The accumulated overstatement of inventory was $1,263,566 through December 31, 2017. In addition, as a related party, so the acquisition was recorded at the historical cost of Blue Fin.  Blue Fin became a wholly-owned subsidiaryresult of the change in estimated gold ounces, amortization of mineral properties was also miscalculated because it is based on units of production. Mineral properties were understated by $90,712 at December 31, 2017.

Management assessed the materiality of the effect of the errors on the Company’s prior annual financial statements, both quantitatively and qualitatively, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 99, “Materiality” and SAB No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” Management concluded the error was not material to any previously issued financial statements. Consequently, the Company will correct this error prospectively and all inter-company accountsrevise its financial statements when the balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive income and cash flows for such prior periods are included in future filings (“the Revisions”). The Revisions have been eliminated.

no net impact on revenue or net cash provided by operating activities as previously reported.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

The adjustments at December 31, 2017 to record the cumulative amounts related to this overstatement for prior periods through December 31, 2017 were:

  

As of and for the year ended

December 31, 2017

 
  As Previously Reported  Adjustment  As Revised 
Balance Sheet            
Inventories, current $600,000  $(228,222) $371,778 
Total current assets  706,463   (228,222)  478,241 
Inventories, non-current  2,721,936   (1,035,844)  1,686,592 
Mineral properties  1,114,675   90,712   1,205,387 
Total Assets  8,917,564   (1,172,854)  7,744,710 
             
Accumulated deficit  (29,915,289)  (1,172,854)  (31,088,143)
Total shareholders’ equity  (20,756,461)  (1,172,854)  (21,929,315)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity  8,917,564   (1,172,854)  7,744,710 
             
Statement of Operations            
General production costs  591,725   (73,521)  518,204 
Operating Loss  (1,426,290)  73,521   (1,352,769)
Net Income (Loss)  (3,960,634)  73,521   (3,887,113)
             
Basic and Diluted Income (loss) per share  (0.29)  (0.01)  (0.30)
             
Statement of Cash Flows            
Net Income (Loss) $(3,960,634) $73,521  $(3,887,113)
Change in inventory  (228,004)  (73,521)  (301,525)
Cash flow from operating activities  (1,074,118)  -   (1,074,118)

NOTE 23 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES


POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies of the Company is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.


Accounting Method

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820).  This Update provides amendments to, Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, that require new disclosures and clarify existing disclosures. The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010.

In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).  This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent).  The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009.  Early application is permitted in financial statements for earlier interim and annual periods that have not been issued. The adoption of this Update will have no material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities.  The guidance provided in this Update is effective for the first reporting period beginning after issuance. The adoption of this statement will have no material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations
7

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162, which is codified in FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105”). ASC 105 establishes the Codification as the source of authoritative GAAP in the United States (the “GAAP hierarchy”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. Once the Codification is in effect, all of its content will carry the same level of authority and the GAAP hierarchy will be modified to include only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. ASC 105 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We adopted the requirements of ASC 105 in the third quarter of 2009; the adoption had no material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS No. 167”), which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The amendments will significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FASB ASC 810, Consolidation and require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity.
SFAS No. 167 has not yet been codified and in accordance with ASC 105, remains authoritative guidance until such time that it is integrated in the FASB ASC. SFAS No. 167 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009, early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this Update will have no material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In June, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). This Statement removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from Statement 140 and removes the exception from applying FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to qualifying special-purpose entities.
SFAS No. 166 has not yet been codified and in accordance with ASC 105, remains authoritative guidance until such time that it is integrated in the FASB ASC. SFAS No. 166 is effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement will have no material effect on the financial statements. The adoption of this statement will have no material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In May, 2009, FASB issued ASC Topic 855 Subsequent Events which establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 855, the Company currently evaluates subsequent events through the date the financial statements are available to be issued.  In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. This provides amendments to Subtopic 855-10 concerning when a company is required to evaluate subsequent events.  The amendments in this update are effective upon final issuance.

Accounting for Stock Options and Warrants and Stock Awards Granted to Employees and Nonemployees

All transactions in which goods or services are received for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock or options to purchase shares of common stock are accounted for based on the fair value of the goods or services received or the fair value of the equity interest issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The Company accounts forestimates the fair value of stock-based compensation using the Black-Scholes model, which requires the input of some subjective assumptions. These assumptions include estimating the length of time employees will retain their vested stock based compensation to employees as required by ASC Topic 718 Compensation-Stock Compensationoptions before exercising them (“expected life”), the estimated volatility of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification,Company’s common stock price over the expected term (“volatility”), the risk-free interest rate and stock based compensation to nonemployees as required by ASC Topic 505-50 Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees.  Stock awards have been valued atthe dividend yield. Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of the fair value using recent share issuance prices for cash, in arms length transactions ($0.70 per share). Options and warrants are valued using the Black-Scholls pricing model.  See Note 4.of stock-based compensation.


8

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2009 AND 2008

2018 and 2017

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Significant estimates used in preparing these financial statements include those assumed in estimating gold ounces in inventories, the recoverability of the cost of mining claims, asset retirement obligation, stock-based compensation, determination of the fair value of common stock issued, deferred tax assets and related valuation allowances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior periods’ amounts to the current presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on the results of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows previously reported.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the

The Company considers all highly liquid investments and short-term debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.


Concentration

Reclamation bonds

Reclamation bonds primarily represent bonds and are restricted primarily for reclamation funding which are carried at cost plus earned interest. Reclamation bonds are shown as a non-current asset and is included in the balance sheet. See Note 5.

Inventories

The recovery of Credit Risk

gold from certain oxide ores is achieved through the heap leaching process. Under this method, mineralized material is placed on a leach pad where it is treated with a chemical solution, which dissolves the gold contained in the material. The resulting “pregnant” solution is further processed in a plant where gold is recovered. The Company maintains its cashrecords ore on leach pad, solution in two commercial accountscarbon columns in process and gold concentrate, at two major financial institutions. Althoughaverage production cost per gold ounce, less provisions required to reduce inventory to net realizable value. Production costs include the financial institutionscost of mineralized material processed; direct and indirect materials and consumables; direct labor; repairs and maintenance; utilities; amortization of property, equipment, and mineral properties; and mine administrative expenses. Revenue from the sale of silver is accounted for as by-product and is deducted from production costs. Costs are considered creditworthyremoved from ore on leach pads as ounces are recovered, based on the average cost per recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pad.

Estimates of recoverable gold on the leach pad are calculated from the quantities of material placed on the leach pad (measured tons added to the leach pad), the grade of material placed on the leach pad (based on assay data) and have not experienced any lossesan estimated recovery percentage (based on their deposits, atore type). The nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, actual gold ounces recovered are regularly monitored and estimates are refined based on actual results over time. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the Company’s cash balance exceeded Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) limits by $612,590 and $0 respectively.


Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met: a)2018, the Company has entered intohad a legally binding agreementlimited operating history and actual results only over a short period of time. Due to this, estimates of recoverable gold are based primarily on initial tests with the customer; b) the products or services have been delivered; c) the Company's fee for providing the productsonly limited refinements.

Variations between actual and services is fixedestimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and determinable; and d) collection of the Company’s fee is probable.  The Company’s policy isestimates that do not result in write-downs to record revenue net of any applicable sales, use, or excise taxes.


Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company's best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company's existing receivables. The Company determines the allowance based on factors such as historical collection experience, customer's current creditworthiness, customer concentration, age of accounts receivable balance and general economic conditions that may affect a customer's ability to pay. Actual customer collections could differ from estimates. Account balances are charged to the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. Provisions to the allowance for doubtful accounts are charged to expense. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per share.  Common stock equivalents outstanding are 400,000 shares of common stock that the convertible notes can be converted into.  However, the diluted earnings per share is not presented because its effect would be anti-dilutive.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company's financial instruments as defined by FASB ASC 825-10-50, include cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses.  All instrumentsrealizable value are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due toprospective basis. The ultimate recovery of gold from a leach pad will not be known until the short maturityleaching process is concluded. The quantification of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at December 31, 2009.

FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizesmaterial inventory on the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1.  Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2.  Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3.  Unobservable inputs in which thereleach pad is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company measures its investments at fair valuebased on a recurring basis.

Loan Receivable
Loans are carried at the unpaid principal plus accrued interest. Loans considered uncollectible are written-off. Recoveries on loans previously written-off are recorded in income in the period of recovery.
9

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
Marketable Securities
The Company accounts for marketable securities as required by ASC Topic 320 Investments – Debt & Equity.  At acquisition, an entity shall classify debt securities and equity securities into oneestimates of the following three categories:
Heldquantities of gold at each balance sheet date that the Company expects to Maturity –recover during the positive intentnext 12 to 18 months. See Notes 2 and ability to hold to maturity. Amounts are reported at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
Trading Securities – bought principally for purpose of selling them in the near term. Amounts are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.
Available for Sale – not classified in one of the above categories. Amounts are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported separately as a component of stockholders’ equity.
Mineral Exploration and Development Costs
The Company accounts for mineral exploration and development costs in accordance with ASC Topic 932 Extractive Activities.  All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred, previously capitalized costs are
expensed in the period the property is abandoned.  Expenditures to develop new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operating mines, are capitalized and amortized on units of production basis over proven and probable reserves.

Mineral Properties and Leases
The Company accounts for mineral properties in accordance with ASC Topic 930 Extractive Activities-Mining.  Costs of acquiring mineral properties and leases are capitalized by project area upon purchase of the associated claims (see Note 5).  Mineral properties are periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value.

6.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from fivethree to seven years. The Company evaluates the recoverability of property and equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. The Company determines impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Replacements and betterments that extend the useful life of the property and equipment are capitalized. The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of operations. See Note 7.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Mineral Properties and Leases

The Company capitalizes costs for acquiring mineral properties and ongoing mineral lease payments and expenses costs to maintain mineral rights. Upon reaching the production stage, the capitalized costs are amortized using the units-of-production method on the basis of periodic estimates of ore reserves. Mineral properties are periodically assessed for impairment of value, and any subsequent losses are charged to operations at the time of impairment. If a property is abandoned or sold, its capitalized costs are charged to operations. Mine property costs include the building of infrastructure of the processing facility including the heap leach pad and the carbon in column process plant along with water wells, roads and fencing. These costs are capitalized until ready for their intended use at which time they are amortized using the units of production method based on projected units of production which approximates the estimated life of the facility. Additionally, interest is capitalized to mine development until such assets are ready for their intended use. The Company does not have proven and probable reserves at this time. See Note 8.

Mineral Exploration and Development Costs

Until proven and probable reserves (as defined by SEC Guide 7) are established, all exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. Once such reserves are established, expenditures to develop new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operations, are capitalized and will be amortized on units of production basis over proven and probable reserves. Previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period the property is abandoned.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the carrying amounts of its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. Estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from each mineral property are calculated using estimated future production, three-year average metals prices, operating capital and costs, and reclamations costs. An impairment loss is recognized when the estimated discounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows are subject to risks and uncertainties. It is reasonably possible that changes in estimates could occur which may affect the expected recoverability of the Company’s investments in mineral properties.

Provision for Taxes

Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to ASC Topic 740-10-25 Income Taxes – Recognition.accounting. Under thethis approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by ASC Topic 740-10-25-5 to allow recognition of such an asset.


Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used for income tax purposes.

When applicable, the Company will recognize a liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. No such interest or penalties were recognized during the periods presented. See Note 16.


Significant components of the deferred tax assets for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

  
December 31,
2009
  
December 31
2008
 
Net operating loss carryforward $1,502,785  $984,566 
         
Deferred tax asset  510,947   334,072 
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance $(510,947) $(334,072)

10

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2009 AND 2008

2018 and 2017

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of the Company.

  2018  2017 
Net income (loss) $21,344,498  $(4,076,641)
Deemed capital contribution on extinguishment of preferred stock  4,068,720   - 
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders - basic  25,413,218   (4,150,162)
Interest expense on convertible notes payable - related parties  74,465   - 
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders - diluted $25,487,683  $(4,150,162)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic  19,196,808   13,682,082 
Dilutive shares – convertible notes payable – related parties  3,457,602   - 
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted  22,654,411   13,682,082 
         
Basic income (loss) per share $1.32  $(0.30)
         
Diluted income (loss) per share $1.12  $(0.30)

At December 31, 2009,2018, the common stock equivalents of 2,400,000 associated with the Company’s outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was not lower than the average share price during the year.

At December 31, 2017, common stock equivalents included 3,728,886 shares associated with convertible debt – related parties and 47,211,002 shares associated with convertible preferred stock. These were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive.

Revenue Recognition

Sales of gold concentrate sold directly to customers are recorded as revenues and receivables upon completion of the performance obligations and transfer of control of the product to the customer. For concentrate sales, the performance obligation is met, the transaction price can be reasonably estimated, and revenue is recognized generally at the time of shipment at estimated forward prices for the anticipated month of settlement. Due to the time elapsed from shipment to the customer and the final settlement with the customer, prices at which sales of our concentrates will be settled are estimated. Previously recorded sales and accounts receivable are adjusted to the estimated settlement metals prices until final settlement by the customer.

Sales and accounts receivable for concentrate shipments are recorded net of charges by the customer for treatment, refining, smelting losses, and other charges negotiated with the customers. Charges are estimated upon shipment of concentrates based on contractual terms, and actual charges typically do not vary materially from estimates. See Note 15.

Reclamation and Remediation

The Company’s operations have been, and are subject to, standards for mine reclamation that have been established by various governmental agencies. The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which the Company incurs a legal obligation for the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. A corresponding asset is also recorded and depreciated over the life of the asset. After the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation, the liability is adjusted when there are changes in the estimated future cash flows due to change in estimated costs or change in time until reclamation will commence. Determination of any amounts recognized is based upon numerous estimates and assumptions, including future retirement costs, future inflation rates and the credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates. Such assumptions are based on the Company’s current mining plan and the best available information for making such estimates. See Note 14.

For non-operating properties, the Company accrues costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when it is probable that such costs will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable. Such costs are based on management’s estimate of amounts expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed.

Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents as well as various notes payable. All instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity and interest rates of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Fair Value Measurements

The Company discloses the following information for each class of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value:

1.the fair value measurement;
2.the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall, segregating fair value measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), significant other observable inputs (Level 2), and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3);
3.for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances, separately presenting changes during the period attributable to the following:
a.total gains or losses for the period (realized and unrealized), segregating those gains or losses included in earnings, and a description of where those gains or losses included in earnings are reported in the statement of operations;
b.the amount of these gains or losses attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets or liabilities still held at the reporting period date and a description of where those unrealized gains or losses are reported;
c.purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (net); and
d.transfers into and/or out of Level 3.
4.the amount of the total gains or losses for the period included in earnings that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date and a description of where those unrealized gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations; and
5.in annual periods only, the valuation technique(s) used to measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation techniques, if any, during the period.

At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,503,000, which expire in the years 2015 through 2029. The change in the allowance account from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2008 was $176,875.


Reverse Stock Split
Effective April 3, 2009, the Company reverse split the outstanding shares of its common stockno assets nor liabilities that require measurement at the rate of one share for each 12 shares outstanding (1:12).   All references in the accompanying financial statements to the number of common shares outstanding and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the reverse stock split.

Use of Estimates
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses.  Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements.  Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

fair value on a recurring basis.

Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit incurredof $5,674,925 through December 31, 2009,2018 and negative working capital of $2,789,068 which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.


An estimated $500,000 is believed necessary to continue operations and increase development through the next fiscal year.

Although production has restarted in 2019, it has not yet reached optimum levels. The timing and amount of capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including demand for products, and servicesmetals market pricing, and the availability of opportunities for expansion through affiliations and other business relationships. Management intendsAlthough management has procured funding through a lender (Note 20) they intend to continue to seek new capital from equity securities issuances to provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth, and fully implement its business plan.


If the going concern assumption were not appropriate for these consolidated financial statements, then adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values of the assets and liabilities, the reported revenues and expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Updates Adopted

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 Revenue Recognition, replacing guidance previously codified in Subtopic 605-10 Revenue Recognition-Overall. The new ASU establishes a five step principles-based framework in an effort to significantly enhance comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. ASU No. 2015-14 deferred the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 until annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified-retrospective transition approach. 

The Company performed an assessment of the impact of implementation of ASU No. 2014-09, and concluded it does not change the timing of revenue recognition or amounts of revenue recognized compared to how it recognized revenue under previous policies. Revenues involve a very small number of types of contracts and customers. In addition, revenue contracts do not involve multiple types of performance obligations.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Concentrate sales involve variable consideration as they are subject to changes in metals prices between the time of shipment and their final settlement. However, the Company is able to reasonably estimate the transaction price for the concentrate sales at the time of shipment using forward prices for the month of settlement, and values are adjusted each period until final settlement. Also, it is unlikely a significant reversal of revenue for any one concentrate lot will occur.

Adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 involves additional disclosures, where applicable, concerning (i) contracts with customers, (ii) significant judgments and changes in judgments in determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations and the transaction price, and (iii) assets recognized for costs to obtain or fulfill contracts. See Note 15 for information on our sales of products.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The update provides guidance on classification of cash receipts and payments related to eight specific issues. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this update as of January 1, 2018 and there were no material impacts on our financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18 Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The update requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this update as of January 1, 2018, and there were no material impacts on our financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01 Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The update clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. We adopted this update as of January 1, 2018. We will apply the applicable provisions of the update to any future acquisitions.

Accounting Standards Updates to Become Effective in Future Periods

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842). The update modifies the classification criteria and requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Upon implementation of the new guidance, we will be required to recognize a liability and right-of-use asset for our operating leases. We have elected the transition option to apply the new guidance at the effective date without adjusting comparative periods presented. Our operating leases, which will be impacted upon adoption, are not significant and we anticipate no material impact upon adoption on January 1, 2019.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 34 - CAPITAL STOCK


Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock. All shares have equal voting rights and have one vote per share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company.


During

2018 Activity

The Company sold 4,500,000 shares of common stock to the year ended December 31, 2008,convertible debt holders for $625,000 in cash and several concessions as to the convertibility, due dates and default provisions on their outstanding debt. See Note 9. The Company issued 289,583also sold 2,125,000 shares of its common stock at $.40 per share for cash proceeds of $173,750, and 33,333 shares$850,000.

The Company failed to repay the related parties’ convertible debt in full on the November 30, 2018 maturity date. See Note 9. Under the terms of common stock for services valued at $16,600.


During the year ended December 31, 2009,debt agreements, the Company issued 750,000 shares of its common stock for mineral leases valued at $525,000, 60,824 shares of its common stock for reclamation bonds valued at $42,802, 300,000 shares of its common stock as an incentive for investors to enter a convertible note agreement valued at $210,000, 50,000 shares of its common stock for wages valued at $35,000, 2,713,636 shares of its common stock for an investment in a wholly-owned subsidiary valued at $2,485 from related parties.  Additionally, in two private placements the Company issued 1,436,300 shares of common stock at $0.70 per share for a total of $1,005,410 in cash.  The shares offered were sold pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D.

NOTE 4 - STOCK PLAN

The Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan” on July 12, 2008, pursuant to which the Company may grant incentive and non-qualified stock options or shares of common stock to employeesthe note holders. The shares were valued at $0.40 per share ($120,000) which was determined by management to be the fair value of a share of common stock based upon sales of common stock shares in 2018. The issuance was accounted for as financing expense.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and consultants, including directors2017

2017 Activity

The Company failed to repay the related parties’ convertible debt in full on the November 30, 2017 maturity date. See Note 9. Under the terms of debt agreements, the Company issued a total of 300,000 shares of common stock to the note holders and officers, from timethese shares have been recorded as of November 30, 2017. This issuance was valued at an estimated $0.04 per share ($12,000) which was determined by management to time.be the fair value of a share of common stock based upon a third-party valuation performed in 2014. The Plan authorizesissuance was accounted for as financing expense.

Common stock redeemable with gold proceeds

An equity financing was initiated in September 2012 for the issuancesale of 1,250,000up to 1,150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. This offering closed December 31, 2012 with proceeds of $130,000 raised through sales of 130,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Under the terms of this offering, the shares could be redeemed for cash generated from the sale of gold for a period of 12 months after commencement of operations at the Kiewit project. Proceeds from 5% of the gold produced during the first year of production were to be allocated to fund this option. Each investor received the right to convert a minimum of one-half and up to all of his shares (on a pro rata basis) into the value of the number of ounces represented by the total investment, determined using a base price of $1,000 per ounce. Due to the redemption feature of these shares, management has concluded that the shares should be recorded as a liability and not as equity.

Once sales of concentrate began in 2014, all investors in this equity financing opted to convert their shares for cash from 5% of the gold sales. Based on the sales price of gold sold during the conversion period, $151,406 in gold proceeds was due to be paid to investors at December 31, 2016 which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2017 and 2018. Payments of these funds due to investors were not made as of December 31, 2018 and the shares were not cancelled. As a condition of the financing agreement settled on March 7, 2019, settlement was made to the four investors. Because of the extended time from investment to payment, each shareholder was paid an amount equal to $1,250 per share purchased and was also allowed to retain stock shares purchased as part of this financing.

Preferred Stock

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorized 10,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value Preferred Stock available for grantsissuance with such rights and preferences, including liquidation, dividend, conversion, and voting rights, as the Board of shares orDirectors may determine.

At December 31, 2017, DMRJ Group beneficially owned 77% of the exerciseCompany on a fully diluted basis. On March 8, 2018, the Company finalized an agreement with the trustees of stock options granted under the Plan.  The Plan will continue in effect untilDMRJ, who owned all of the stock available for grant or issuance has been acquired through exercise of options or grants of shares, or until July 12, 2018, whichever is earlier.  The Plan may also be terminated in the event of certain corporate transactions such as a merger or consolidation or the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantiallySeries A, A-2 and Series B outstanding preferred stock. This agreement discharged all of the debt owed by the Company to DMRJ and its related affiliates and returned all of the shares of preferred stock to the Company in exchange for $625,000. The Company then cancelled all of the preferred shares of stock. As a result, DMRJ relinquished all ownership in the Company. See Note 13.

NOTE 5 – RECLAMATION BONDS

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company has a surety bond of $674,000 in an escrow account with the bonding company for reclamation of its property. This escrowed amount is held at Bank of New York, Mellon for the Company’s assets.benefit. It may not be released to the Company without the prior consent of the surety bondholder. The escrowed amount does not earn interest. Total reclamation bonds posted at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are $753,290 and $753,054, respectively, which consists of the above escrowed amount along with certificate of deposits held with the state of Utah for the remaining bonds on the property, including exploration bonds.

NOTE 6 – INVENTORIES

The following table provides the components of inventories:

  December 31, 
  2018  2017
(Revised)
 
Ore on leach pad $1,193,341  $2,058,370 
Less: current portion  (1,193,341)  (371,778)
Non-current inventories $-  $1,686,592 

11

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
The exercise price of each option is established by the plan administrator.  Additionally, the plan administrator will fix the terms of each option, but no option will be granted for a term in excess of ten years.  Stock issued under the
Plan may be granted for cash or other consideration determined by the plan administrator.  Options and stock granted under the Plan may vest immediately or upon terms established by the plan administrator.

There were initially 15,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for non-statutory and incentive stock option and stock grants under the Plan, which are subject

Notes to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, and other situations.  On April 3, 2009, the outstanding shares of common stock were reverse split at the rate of one-for-twelve, which reduced the number of shares authorized under the Plan to 1,250,000.


During the year endedFinancial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2009, the Company granted 50,000 shares under the Plan2018 and during the year ended2017

Inventories at December 31, 2008, the Company granted 24,999 shares under the Plan.  Of the shares granted in 2008, 16,666 were granted for legal2017 are allocated between current and accounting services rendered and 8,333 where granted to a director for accepting appointment to the Board of Directors.  The shares granted in 2009 were for mining services.  All of the shares are fully vested.


NOTE 5 – MINERAL PROPERTIES

The Company holds operating interests within the Gold Hill Mining District in Tooele County, Utah, consisting of 419 unpatented mining claims, including an unpatented mill site claim, 42 patented claims, and seven Utah state mineral leases locatednon-current based on state trust lands, all covering approximately 33 square miles.  Rights to all but four of these mining claims and leases were obtained under the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement dated July 24, 2009, with Clifton Mining Company and Woodman Mining Company as lessors.  Rights to the four Yellow Hammer patented claims were obtained under the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement dated July 24, 2009, with the Jeneane C. Moeller Family Trust.  The properties are located approximately 190 miles west-southwest of Salt Lake City, Utah, and 56 miles south southeast of Wendover, Utah.  The Company intends to concentrate its exploration activities on the four patented Yellow Hammer claims, the Kiewit project consisting of seven of the unpatented Kiewit claims, and the Cactus Mill project consisting of an unpatented mill site.  Mineral extraction activities on the property will be open-pit and the Company does not anticipate conducting any underground mining activities.

Additionally, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Blue Fin Capital, Inc., holds eight unpatented mining claims in Yavapai County, Arizona.  The Company has no current plans to explore these claims.

There are no proven or probable reserves for any of the claims or leases held by the Company.
The Company intends to commence large mining operations for three surface mines and a heap leach gold operation on the Kiewit unpatented claims.
The Company, through its joint venture agreement with Clifton Mining, has access to all data, core samples and related reports associated with the aforementioned properties.  Desert Hawk has made application for a Large Mining Operations Permit to construct a heap leach facility and commence exploration activities on these claims.
12

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
Cactus Mill Pilot Plant
Located on the Cactus Mill site are two process facilities, a 150 ton per day mill built by Woodman Mining and operated until the 1980s.  The mill has equipment used to process copper, gold, silver, and tungsten ores from the district.  In addition there is a second facility constructed in the 1990s for custom milling precious metals
13

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
NOTE 5 – MINERAL PROPERTIES (Continued)

concentrates.  Equipment from both mills will be used to construct a 240 ton per day pilot mill capable of recovering copper, gold, silver and tungsten mineralized material initially extracted from the Yellow Hammer claims.  Pursuant to the Company’s joint venture agreement with Clifton Mining, it has access to Cane Springs, a natural flowing spring approximately 1,000 feet southwest of the Cactus Mill site, as well as the Cane Springs mine shaft located approximately one-quarter mile south of the Cactus Mill property.  The Company holds a permit from the Utah Division of Oil Gas and Miningestimated expected sales for the pilot plant which allows flotationsubsequent fiscal year. All inventory at December 31, 2018 is expected to be sold during 2019. Thus the entire balance is classified as current. Inventories at December 31, 2018 and gravity concentration.  The Company has filed an application to amend its permit to operateDecember 31, 2017 and was valued at net realizable value because costs were greater than the pilot mill to allow construction of a heap leach facility near the mill to process mineralized material from the Yellow Hammer claims.

Yellow Hammer Claims
The Company completed approximately 6,000 feet of drilling on the Yellow Hammer claims in fourth quarter of 2009.  Composites were made of several key areas and re-analyzedmarket price for gold silver, copper and tungsten.  Metallurgical work is ongoing at independent labs for evaluation.  The Company holds a Small Mining Operations Permit from the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining and has posted a reclamation bond of $25,300.  This permit stipulates that the Company may conduct exploration or mining operations on these claims so long as such activities are limited to an area within five acres.

Exploration Expenditures
Exploration expenditures incurred by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

  2009  2008 
       
Assaying $12,307  $- 
Drilling  5,527   - 
Equipment rental  12,298   - 
Geological consulting fees  27,250   - 
Maps and miscellaneous  1,674   - 
Metallurgy  5,918   - 
Site costs  44,209   - 
Transportation  11,141   - 
         
Exploration expenditures for year $120,324  $- 

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLE

The Company issued two convertible promissory notes, for a total of $600,000 on November 18, 2009.  The notes bear interest at 15% per annum.  Interest only is payable in equal monthly installments of $7,500.  The notes are convertible at any time at a rate of $1.50 per share, and are due November 18, 2012 or 36 months from the date of issuance.  In addition, the holders of the notes were issued 300,000 bonus shares at a rate of one share for each $2.00 loaned.  Also, in the event the Company fails to repay the loan or interest thereon in full on the maturity date, the Company will be required to issue an additional 300,000 shares.

both year-end dates.

NOTE 7 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT


Property and equipment are stated at cost.  Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The useful lives of property, plant and equipment for purposes of computing depreciation are five to seven years.

The following is a summary of property, equipment, and accumulated depreciation:

14

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
NOTE 7 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)

  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
Equipment $23,711  $- 
Less accumulated depreciation  (7,104) $- 
  $16,607  $- 

Depreciation and amortization expense for the year endeddepreciation at December 31, 2009 was $7,104.  The Company evaluates the recoverability of property2018 and equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired.  The Company determines impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts.  Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.  Replacements and betterments are capitalized.  The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of operations.

December 31, 2017:

  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
Equipment $3,093,690  $2,919,165 
Furniture and fixtures  6,981   6,981 
Electronic and computerized equipment  52,874   52,874 
Vehicles  108,089   67,115 
   3,261,634   3,046,135 
Less accumulated depreciation  (1,856,149)  (1,434,921)
   1,405,485   1,611,214 
         
Kiewit property improvements  2,497,436   2,497,436 
Less accumulated amortization  (487,214)  (487,214)
   2,010,222   2,010,222 
         
Total $3,415,707  $3,621,436 

NOTE 8 – NOTE RECEIVABLE


On October 21, 2008, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement/ Senior Promissory Note with S3 Investment Company, Inc in the amountMINERAL PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS

Mineral properties and interests as of $40,000. The note is due within 30 days of the closing of the Company’s RTP/PIPE transaction.  The note carries a guaranteed minimum return of $40,000 in cash and $40,000 in stock.  The cash portion of this note was fully repaid during the year ended December 31, 2009.


NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS

During the year ended2018 and December 31, 2009 the2017 are as follows:

  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
Initial lease fee      
Kiewit, Cactus Mill and all other sites $600,000  $600,000 
   600,000   600,000 
Asset retirement costs        
Kiewit Site  452,193   789,026 
Kiewit Exploration  11,126   10,780 
Cactus Mill  26,234   16,133 
   489,553   815,939 
   1,089,553   1,415,939 
Accumulated amortization  (210,552)  (210,552)
Total $879,001  $1,205,387 

The Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the Moeller Family Trust for the leasing of the Trust’s Yellow Hammer property inholds operating interests within the Gold Hill Mining District in Tooele County, Utah, consisting of Utah.  Pursuant to247 unpatented claims, including the agreement, Moeller Family Trust received 250,000 sharesunpatented mill site claim, and two Utah state mineral leases located on state trust lands. Annual claims fees are currently $155 per claim plus administrative fees. As part of the Company’s restricted common stock.  UnderPre-paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement finalized in March 2019, the termsnumber of the Joint Venture agreement, the Company will be requiredclaims held was reduced to pay a 6% net smelter royalty on the productiontotal of base metals and a net smelter royalty on gold and silver based on a sliding scale of between 2% and 15% based on the price of gold and silver, as applicable.  Additionally, if the Company does not place the Yellow Hammer property into commercial production within a three year period it will be required to make annual payments to the Trust of $50,000.  The Company is designated as the operator of the property.


Also during the year ended December 31,76 claims. See Note 20.

In 2009, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the Clifton Mining Company and the Woodman Mining Company for the leasinglease of their property interests in the Gold Hill Mining District of Utah. Pursuant to the agreement, Clifton received 500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted stock.  Under the terms of the Joint Venture agreement,Agreement, the Company will beis required to pay a 4% net smelter royalty on base metals in all other areas except for production from the Kiewit gold property and a net smelter royalty on gold and silver, except for production from the Kiewit gold property, based on a sliding scale of between 2% and 15% based on the price of gold or silver, as applicable. The Company willis also be required to pay a 6% net smelter return on any production from the Kiewit gold property. Additionally, ifRoyalty expense of $13,424 and $9,785 was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Amortization expense is based on units of production resulting in no amortization in the year ended December 31, 2018 due to the lack of production. Amortization expense of $18,193 was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

On August 24, 2018, a letter of default on the Clifton Shears properties was received by the Company doeswith a 30-day period for curing the default.

As part of the Pre-paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement finalized in March 2019, these royalties were bought out by the Company from Clifton Mining Company and two other minority royalty holders. During first quarter of 2019, the Company and Clifton Mining Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement (the “Amended Lease”). Under the terms of this Amended Lease, the Company relinquished its leasehold interest in all but 10 of the patented mining claims, for which it retained only the surface rights, and 66 of the unpatented lode mining claims previously held by the Company. See Note 20.

NOTE 9 –CONVERTIBLE NOTES - RELATED PARTIES

2009 Convertible Notes:

On November 18, 2009, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to two of its minority shareholders, for a total of $600,000. The notes bore interest at 15% per annum. Interest-only was payable in equal monthly installments of $7,500. The notes were convertible at a rate of $0.70 per share.

The Company failed to repay the notes in full on the November 30, 2012 through the 2018 maturity dates, so the Company was required to issue an additional 300,000 shares of common stock to these debt holders in each of those years. In 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, the annual issuance of shares of common stock was valued at an estimated $0.04 (total $12,000) each and was accounted for as financing expense. In 2018, the issuance of shares of common stock was valued at $.40 per share based on the cash price of common stock sales during 2018. The due date of the note was extended each year and has now been extended to May 31, 2019. Interest has not placebeen paid since November 2014. Per the Kiewit, Clifton Shears/smelter tunnel deposit,terms of the notes, interest on these notes is not convertible to common stock.

On February 28, 2018, the notes were amended changing the interest rate from 15% to 10% effective March 1, 2018 and allowing for accrued interest to be payable in full on May 31, 2019. The amendment further waived the default provision in the notes for past due interest. In addition, as part of the agreement, the convertible feature of the notes was removed.

2016 Convertible Notes:

On October 14, 2016, the Company issued additional convertible promissory notes to the convertible debt holders for a total of $250,000. The notes bore interest at 10% per annum and were due in full on September 30, 2018. The notes were convertible at a rate of $0.25 per share. These notes were amended in February 2018 to extend the due date of the notes and the Cane Springs depositaccrued interest to May 31, 2019. Interest on these notes is convertible to common stock.

2017 Convertible Notes:

On August 7, 2017, the convertible debt holders agreed to fund up to an additional aggregate of $500,000 under terms similar to existing convertible debt agreements. At December 31, 2017, $428,000 of these funds had been advanced. The remaining $72,000 was advanced in 2018 with the final advance on February 9, 2018. On February 28, 2018, these notes were amended to postpone the maturity date and interest payment date to May 31, 2019.

Accrued interest payable to related parties on the above convertible notes payable was $456,750 and $317,436 at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Interest expense recognized on these loans was $139,314 and 124,594 during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These loans were paid in full, including accrued interest, on March 7, 2019. See Note 20.

NOTE 10 – SHORT-TERM NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTIES

During 2018, the Company entered into commercial production withinseveral short-term notes payable with the convertible debt holders (See Note 9) for a three year period, it will be requiredtotal of $201,000 and with the Company’s president for $48,000 for a total amount of $249,000. The notes bear interest at 10%, had a 2% loan initiation fee, and are due in full on March 31, 2019. Accrued interest payable to make annualrelated parties on these notes at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $7,243 and nil, respectively. Interest expense recognized on these notes was $7,243 and nil during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These short-term notes were repaid in full to the lenders, including 10% interest and a 2% loan initiation fee, in March 2019. See Note 20.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

NOTE 11 – OBLIGATION UNDER CAPITAL LEASE – RELATED PARTY

A capital lease was entered into on June 20, 2016 with RMH Overhead, LLC for mining and crushing equipment, some of which had been previously owned by the Company. RMH Overhead, LLC is an entity owned by the Company’s president, Rick Havenstrite. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, equipment includes assets under capital lease amounting to $185,618 and $185,618, respectively. The equipment is being amortized over the estimated useful life of the equipment. Accumulated amortization at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $66,292 and $39,775. At December 31, 2018, the estimated future minimum lease payments under the capital lease was $72,000 of which $2,438 is implied interest. The initial lease term was for 24 months, which expired June 20, 2018. The eight future minimum lease payments of $9,000 each plus financing costs were overdue at December 31, 2018. These lease payments were paid in full, including accrued interest and late fees, in March 2019. See Note 20.

NOTE 12 – NOTES PAYABLE – EQUIPMENT

The following is a summary of the equipment notes payable:

  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 
Note payable to Komatsu Financial, collateralized by a Komatsu Telehandler lift, due in 48 monthly installments of $2,441 including interest at 4.99%. $27,192  $47,154 
         
Note payable to CAT Financial, collateralized by crushing equipment, due in 7 monthly installments of $39,000, beginning in May 2018, including interest at 4.0%.  145,067   -0- 
         
Note payable to CAT Financial, collateralized by used mining equipment due in 36 monthly installments of varying amounts including interest at 4.68%.  117,002   266,675 
         
Note payable to Komatsu Financial, collateralized by a Komatsu D275 dozer, due in monthly installments of $11,674 including interest at 2.99%.  34,851   149,687 
         
Note payable to Star Capital, LLC, collateralized by a 2009 Multiquip generator, due in 24 monthly installments of $1,412, beginning in March 2016, including interest at 11.4%.  -0-   5,515 
         
  $324,111  $469,031 
Current portion  (324,111)  (452,214)
Long term portion $-0-  $16,817 

In November 2016, five pieces of mining equipment financed by CAT Financial were repossessed by CAT. The note payable due to CliftonCAT at the time of disposition was $960,585. The loss on impairment of equipment in the amount of $50,000 per location.$147,214 was recognized in the 2016. On July 31, 2017, a new agreement was made with Wheeler Machinery and CAT Financial for the return of four pieces of this equipment to the Company. The Company is designated asequipment temporarily remained in the operatorpossession of Wheeler Machinery and a new payment schedule was established. In May 2018, a note for the remaining payments due for $273,067 was formalized. Of this amount, $141,631 represented the value of the property.

equipment and the remaining amount of $131,436 was to settle accounts payable for past due rent. The equipment was refurbished and returned to the site in 2019.

All of the above notes were paid in full in March 2019 as part of funding from a Pre-paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement. See Note 20.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

NOTE 13 – NOTE PAYABLE – DMRJ

In September 2009,July 2010, the Company acquiredentered into an Investment Agreement with DMRJ. The Agreement had been modified numerous times and operated under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Investment Agreement dated December 22, 2016. The Amendments provided for extensions of payment dates, increased funding capacity and other modifications to the debt agreement. At December 31, 2017, DMRJ beneficially owned approximately 77% of the Company (on a fully-diluted basis) with Series A, A-2 and B preferred stock shares convertible to 47,211,002 shares of common stock (See Note 4).

The total due to DMRJ at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is as follows:

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
       
Principal $-  $15,554,552 
Interest payable  -   9,535,118 
  $-  $25,089,670 

2018 Activity

In the third quarter of 2016, control of the management of DMRJ was given to court appointed trustees of the two major funds of Platinum Partners. On March 8, 2018, the Company finalized an agreement with the trustees to discharge all of the rights and interests of Clifton Mining in a $38,000 reclamation contract and a $3,777 cash surety deposit with the State of Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for the property coveredamounts owed by the joint venture.  As consideration for Clifton Mining selling its interest in the reclamation contractCompany to DMRJ and surety deposit, the Company issued 60,824to extinguish all of DMRJ’s shares to Clifton Mining.  For a period of two years the Company has the right to repurchase the shares for $48,000, or during the 180-day period after this two year period, Clifton Mining will have the option to put the shares to the Company for $48,000.

15

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
NOTE 10 - RESTATEMENT

On September 20, 2010, the management of Desert Hawk Gold Corp. concluded that the information provided in Note 5 of the December 31, 2009 financial statements was inappropriateCompany’s preferred stock in exchange for financial based notes. Management decided to scale back$625,000. On the date of the agreement, the principal balance of the note in which the narrative was modified to remove all technical$15,554,552 and non finance-based information. There were no changes to the financial statements.

In addition, on November 3, 2010, the managementaccrued interest payable was $9,987,009 for a total balance due of Desert Hawk Gold Corp. concluded that the original equity classification of the put option discussed in Note 9 of the December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements was incorrect.  Management has subsequently determined that the put option in connection with the issuance of 60,824 shares should have recorded as a derivative liability, and not as equity under ASC Topic 480-10-25-8.$25,541,561. As a result of the previouslytransaction, the Company recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $24,916,561.

All of the preferred stock of the Company that had been issued consolidated financial statementsto DMRJ in prior years was extinguished. The preferred stock was originally recorded for a total value $4,068,720. As a result of the extinguishment, the Company adjusted accumulated deficit for the value of the preferred stock. This amount is considered a capital contribution and has been added to net income attributable to common stockholders in the calculation of earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been amended2018.

After the above transactions, DMRJ is no longer a shareholder (beneficially or otherwise) of the Company.

The existing convertible debt holders funded the $625,000 and modifications to restatetheir existing convertible note terms were made in exchange for 4,500,000 shares of the financial statementsCompany’s common stock. See Notes 4 and 9.

NOTE 14 – ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

Changes in the asset retirement obligation for the derivative liability classification.  .years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:

  2018  2017 
Asset retirement obligation, beginning of year $1,046,621  $974,109 
Changes to estimated costs and timing to reclaim  (334,342)  - 
Accretion expense  80,468   72,512 
Asset retirement obligation, end of year $792,747  $1,046,621 

In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company updated the asset retirement obligation to reflect a plan for reclamation and closure of the mine at the end of its life having estimated undiscounted costs of approximately $1,369,115, an increase of $30,586 from the $1,338,529 in the previous plan. However, the asset retirement asset and obligation decreased by $334,342 as a result of a change in the estimated timing of costs and the impact of discounting the costs to present value. The Company has used the Black-Scholls pricing model to value the put option. The following assumptionsestimated reclamation costs were used: stock price of $0.70, strike price of $0.79, volatility of 117% (based on similar companies volatility), and risk freediscounted using credit adjusted, risk-free interest rate of 4.35%. This resulted10% from the time we incurred the obligation to the time we expect to pay the retirement obligation.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

NOTE 15 – REVENUE RECOGNITION

Our product consists of an unrefined gold concentrate, which is then refined offsite to become doré, which in 2018 was all sold to H & H Metals Corp. who then traded it to Asahi Refining USA, Inc. (Asahi), a precious metal refinery. In 2017, we sold all of our gold concentrate directly to Asahi. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we discontinued our agreement with H & H Metals Corp. and plan to sell directly to Asahi. See Note 20. Revenue is recognized upon the completion of the performance obligations and transfer of control of the product to the customer, and the transaction price can be determined or reasonably estimated.

Sales and accounts receivable for sales are recorded net of charges for treatment and other charges which represent components of the transaction price. Charges are estimated by us upon transfer of risk based on contractual terms, and actual charges typically do not vary materially from our estimates. Revenue from the sale of metals may be subject to adjustment upon final settlement of estimated metal prices, weights and assays, and are recorded as adjustments to revenue in the period of final settlement of prices, weights and assays; such adjustments are typically not material in relation to the initial invoice amounts. Costs charged by the refiner include fixed treatment, refining and costs per ton of concentrate and may include penalty charges for other metal content above a negotiated baseline as well as excessive moisture.

We have determined the performance obligation is met and title is transferred when the Company recording a derivative liabilitydelivers the concentrate to the customer because, at that time, (i) legal title is transferred to the customer, (ii) the customer has accepted the concentrate lot and obtained the ability to realize all of $26,396.


Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated balance sheetbenefits from the product, (iii) the concentrate content specifications are known, have been communicated to the customer, and the customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership to it, and (iv) we have the right to payment for the period describedconcentrate. The performance obligation is met, the transaction price is known, and revenue is recognized at the time of transfer of control of the agreed-upon metal quantities to the customer.

Sales of products by metal for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Gold $248,344  $162,762 
Silver (by-product)  3,060   4,860 
Less: Smelter and refining charges  (21,432)  (5,038)
Total $229,972  $162,584 

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, we did not have a gold sales receivable balance.

NOTE 16 – INCOME TAXES

There was no income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. The components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets are as follows:

  2018  2017 
Deferred tax asset:        
Net operating loss carryforward $952,000  $5,531,000 
Property and equipment  37,000   37,000 
Exploration costs  85,000   113,000 
Stock based compensation  96,000   - 
Financing costs  23,000   1,000 
Asset retirement obligation  42,000   27,000 
Total deferred tax assets  1,235,000   5,709,000 
Valuation allowance  (1,235,000)  (5,709,000)
Net deferred tax assets $-  $- 

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Deferred income taxes arise from timing differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. A deferred tax asset valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized. As management of the preceding sentenceCompany cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance equal to 100% of the deferred tax assets has been retroactively adjusted as summarized below. There has been no changerecorded at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) resulting in significant modifications to existing law. The Company did not incur any net income tax benefit or provision for the statement of operationsyear ended December 31, 2018 as a result of the change.


Effect of Correction of Derivative Liability As Previously Reported  As Restated  Adjustment 
          
At December 31, 2009         
LIABILITIES         
- Derivative liability $-  $26,396  $26,396(1) 
- Total current liabilities $198,589  $224,985  $26,396(1) 
- Total liabilities $596,756  $623,152  $26,396(1) 
             
RETAINED EARNINGS/EQUITY            
- Additional paid in capital $2,714,620  $2,688,224  $(26,396)(2)
- Total stockholders' equity $1,218,906  $1,192,510  $(26,396)(1)
- Total liabilities/stockholders' equity $1,815,662  $1,789,266  $(26,396)(1)
(1) Cumulative effect of change in derivative liability aschanges to tax laws and tax rates under the Act. The Company’s net deferred tax asset was reduced by approximately $3.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, which consisted primarily of the periodre-measurement of federal deferred tax assets from 35% to 21%.

A reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and the Company’s tax benefit (provision) is as follow:

  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
Amount computed using the statutory rate $4,482,000   (21%) $(1,387,000)  (35%)
Other  (8,000)  -   -   - 
Impact of change in statutory tax rate  -   -   3,805,000   96%
Change in valuation allowance  (4,474,000)  21%  (2,418,000)  (61%)
Total income tax provision (benefit) $-   -% $-   -%

At December 31, 2018, the Company had a federal net operating loss carry forward of approximately $4.5 million which expires in 2037.

During the years ended

(2) Cumulative effect December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no material uncertain tax positions taken by the Company. It is not anticipated that unrecognized tax benefits would significantly increase or decrease within 12 months of reclassifying the derivativereporting date. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. No such interest or penalties were recognized during the periods presented. The Company had no accruals for interest and penalties at December 31, 2018 and 2017. The Company’s federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2014 through 2018 remain open and subject to examination.

NOTE 17 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In addition to transactions disclosed in Note 9, 10, 11 and 13, the Company had the following related party transactions.

The Company recognized rent expense for rental of office space of $12,000 each for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, paid to RMH Overhead, LLC, a company owned by Rick Havenstrite, the Company’s President and CEO. Of the amounts recognized as expense, RMH Overhead, LLC was paid $10,000 and $12,000 during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, leaving a total of $18,750 and $16,750 remaining in accounts payable at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, including amounts from equityprior years. The accounts payable was paid in full in March 2019.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, accrued compensation of $922,039 and $709,577 was due to liabilitiesdirectors and officers. Of the amounts accrued at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, accrued compensation of $593,232 and $491,693 is due to Rick Havenstrite and $234,807 and $173,884 is due to Marianne Havenstrite, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer, respectively. In addition, $94,000 and $44,000 was due to other directors and employees at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The amount due at December 31, 2018 was paid in full in March 2019.

NOTE 18 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has reserved 2,400,000 shares under its 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan was adopted by the board of directors on March 28, 2018, retroactive to February 23, 2018, as a vehicle for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees, officers, directors, consultants, and other service providers. The Plan is administered by the Board of Directors. The Company may issue, to eligible persons, restricted common stock, incentive and non-statutory options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units. The terms and conditions of awards under the Plan will be determined by the Board of Directors.


16

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

(formerly Lucky Joe Mining Company)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In2018 and 2017

On February 2010,23, 2018, the Board approved the grant of Directorsan aggregate of 2,400,000 non-statutory options under the 2018 Plan exercisable at $0.40 per share which expire February 23, 2023 in the amounts and shareholders owning a majorityto the following:

Rick Havenstrite, President and CEO – 1,000,000 options
Howard Crosby, Director – 1,000,000 options
John Ryan, Director – 200,000 options
Linde Havenstrite, Project Engineer – 200,000 options

The options were fully vested on the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Assumptions used in calculating the fair value during the year ended December 31, 2018 were as follows:

  Weighted
Average
Inputs Used
 
    
Annual dividend yield  - 
Expected life (years)  5.0 
Risk-free interest rate  2.54%
Expected volatility based on comparable peers  51.2%
Common stock price based on most recent sale of common stock for cash $0.40 

Stock based compensation cost for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $456,000, which was included in general and administrative expenses. Option activity for the year ended December 31, 2018 consists of the outstanding shares of common stock approved an increase in the number of shares authorized in the Company’s 2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan to 3,000,000.


Also in February 2010, the Board of Directors and shareholders owning a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock approved amendmentsfollowing:

  Stock Options  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted
Average
Life Remaining
(years)
 
          
Outstanding, December 31, 2017  -   -   - 
Issued  2,400,000  $0.40   4.2 
Exercised  -0-   -   - 
Expired  -0-   -     
Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2018  2,400,000  $0.40   4.2 

No options were issued prior to the Company’s Articlesyear ended December 31, 2018. The options have intrinsic value of Incorporation.  On March 1, 2010,nil at December 31, 2018.

NOTE 19 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In addition to commitments disclosed in Notes 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13, the Company filed Amendedhad the following commitments and Restated Articlescontingencies.

Personal property tax and other accrued liabilities

Personal property tax for Tooele County, Utah is billed and becomes due on November 30 of Incorporationeach year. At December 31, 2018, $25,693 was due for 2018, $26,894 was due for 2017, and $82,100 was due for 2016, including interest and penalties, for a total of $134,687 due to Tooele County at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018 this amount remains unpaid and is included in Accounts payable and accrued expenses on the balance sheet. These amounts were paid in full in March 2019.

Proceeds of $130,000 were raised in 2012 from the sale of stock, with shares redeemable for cash generated from the Statesale of Nevada.  These Amendedgold. Based on gold prices during the conversion period in 2014, conversion amounts due to shareholders is $151,406. At December 31, 2018 and Restated Articles decreased2017, this amount remains unpaid and is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the par valuebalance sheet. Settlement of the common shares to $0.001 per share and authorized 10,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.001 per share.  All references to par values have been changedthese amounts was made in the consolidated financial statements presented.

full in June 2019.


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Employment agreements

In FebruarySeptember 2010, the Company entered into a Term Sheetan employment agreement with an investor to provide up to $6,500,000 in loans to the Company.  Under the proposed terms of the funding, the credit facility would provide for minimum traunches of $500,000, would bear interest at 15% per annum, and would mature in two years from the closing date of the transaction.  At the maturity date the Company would be required to repay 120% of the principal amount borrowed.  All funds loaned to the Company would be senior to existing or future debt and would be secured by all assets of the Company.  In addition, at closing the Company would issue preferred shares to the investor convertible into common stockMr. Havenstrite as President of the Company, representing 9.99%which is ongoing. The agreement requires Mr. Havenstrite to meet certain time requirements and limits the number of other board member obligations in which he can participate. The agreement allows for a base annual salary of $120,000 plus certain performance compensation upon fulfillment of established goals. The agreement allows the equityBoard to terminate Mr. Havenstrite’s employment at any time, providing for a severance payment upon termination without cause. This agreement was amended in 2019 to allow for a rate increase for Mr. Havenstrite to an annual rate of $144,000. The Board also agreed in 2019 to compensate it’s directors for their contributions to the management of the Company, onwith one director receiving $5,000 per month and the other two directors receiving $5,000 per quarter.

Finder’s Agreement

On May 11, 2018, the Company agreed to an agreement with Mount Royal Consultants (Mount Royal) to assist in finding prospective investors. Mount Royal would receive a fully diluted basis at closing.  The preferred shares wouldfinder’s fee of 7% for a connection with a company that resulted in a qualified investment consisting of equity securities or a fee of 3% for a connection with a company that resulted in a purchase of debt securities. On March 8, 2019, the Company closed a Pre-paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) to a buyer for the purchase of gold produced from the Company’s mining property. This investment was considered to be entitleda debt agreement and resulted in a payment to preemptive rights, would be entitled to full ratchet anti-dilution protection and would be convertible at the optionMount Royal of $318,000, 3% of the holder.  The Company is responsible for all legal and due diligence costs incurred$10,600,000 beneficially received by the investor.


On March 31, 2010, the company received 20,000 shares of stock valued at $40,000Company from PDK Utah Holdings, LLC in payment of its outstanding Loan Receivable. See Note 8.

In June 2010, the Company entered into amended and restated agreements with Clifton Mining Company and Woodman Mining Company and with the Moeller Family Trust.  The Amended and Restated and Sublease Agreements restate and replace the prior Mining Venture Agreements between the Company and these parties.  Under the restated agreements Clifton Mining and Woodman Mining and Moeller Family Trust granted the Company exclusive leasehold interests in the mining claims covered by the original agreements.  The restated agreements are effective as of the date of the original agreements and the term of the restated agreements is for 20 years from the date of the original agreements.  The restated agreements also permit the Company to mortgage or pledge the leasehold interests acquired under the agreements for the purpose of financing exploration, development, and mining operations on the properties.  The leasing parties also agreed2019. Future amounts to be responsible for any liability arising under certain potential encumbrancesreceived from PDK Utah Holdings, LLC would also be subject to the mining claims and to indemnify the Company and its affiliates against the loss of leasehold title or other actual losses or expenses from the potential encumbrances.  All other material terms of the original agreements are preserved in the restated agreements.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events from the balance sheet date, December 31, 2009, through the date these financial statements were issued and has determined that there are no additional events that would require disclosure in these financial statements.
17



[OUTSIDE BACK COVER]

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
[A Nevada Corporation]

8,327,071  Shares

Common Stock


PROSPECTUS


DESERT HAWK GOLD CORP.

8921 N. Indian Trail Road, #288
Spokane, WA   99208

Telephone (509) 434-8161

_______________, 2011


Until                            , 2011, all dealers that effect transactions in our shares, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus.  This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.



PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS

agreement.

NOTE 20 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Mining Leases

During first quarter of 2019, the Company and Clifton Mining Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement (the “Amended Lease”). Under the terms of the Amended Lease, the Company relinquished its leasehold interest in all but 10 of the patented mining claims, for which it retained only the surface rights, and 66 of the unpatented lode mining claims previously held by the Company. The mining claims retained by the Company represent the Kiewit area of interest. The Amended Lease term is 20 years and for so long thereafter as the mining claims are being actively used by the Company for commercial mining purposes.

Under the terms of the Amended Lease the Company acquired and cancelled Clifton’s 5% royalty interest from production on the Kiewit project. The Company also acquired from third parties and cancelled the remaining 1% outstanding royalty interest thereon, for which the Company paid each party $50,000.

As consideration for entering into the Amended Lease, the Company paid Clifton $3,000,000 and issued 5,500,000 shares of its common stock. In addition, the Company and Clifton entered into a Registration Rights Agreement to register for resale the shares issued to Clifton which requires the Company to register the shares within 18 months following the Initial Funding (see below). In the event the Company does not register the shares within the 18-month period, the Company is obligated to pay Clifton a royalty equal to 2.5% of the net smelter returns from the minerals generated from the Company’s mining claims.

Gold Sale Funding Transaction

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company closed a Pre-paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) to a buyer for the purchase of gold produced from the Company’s mining property. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the buyer has agreed to purchase 73,910 ounces of gold from the Company in three tranches, with prepayment of the initial tranche in the amount of $11,200,000 having been made upon execution of the Purchase Agreement (the “Initial Funding”), $4,500,000 for Tranche 2 to occur at least six months following the Initial Funding date, and $5,500,000 for Tranche 3 to occur at least 10 months following the Initial Funding date, provided that all conditions precedent for funding Tranches 2 and 3 are met. From the initial funds, the Company paid an upfront fee of $600,000 to buyer for expenses incurred in connection with the transaction. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement the Company is obligated to deliver gold in the following quantities following prepayment of each tranche:

Beginning the 21st calendar month following the Initial Funding, 655 ounces of gold per month for each of the four calendar months thereafter, 670 ounces for each the 12 calendar months thereafter, and 1,155 ounces for each of the 24 calendar months thereafter.

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

Notes to Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Beginning the 15th Calendar month following the Tranche 2 funding, 50 ounces of gold per month for each of the four calendar months thereafter, 220 ounces for each the 12 calendar months thereafter, 370 ounces for each of the 24 months thereafter, and 600 ounces for each of the six calendar months thereafter.

Beginning the 15th Calendar month following the Tranche 3 funding, 90 ounces of gold per month for each of the 12 calendar months thereafter, 270 ounces for each the 24 calendar months thereafter, 1,025 ounces for each of the six calendar months thereafter, and 1,625 ounces for each of the four calendar months thereafter.

If during the term of the Purchase Agreement, the gold spot price falls below $1,134 per ounce, the buyer may require the Company to sell an additional 10 ounces of gold to the buyer for each scheduled delivery month thereafter at a discounted amount as determined by the Purchase Agreement.

As security for the obligations of the Company under the Purchase Agreement, the Company has granted the buyer a security interest in all of the assets of the Company and has issued and recorded a Leasehold Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases, Rents, As Extracted Collateral and Contracts, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing.

Concurrent with the Initial Funding, the Company granted a perpetual royalty to the buyer equal to 4% of the net smelter returns payable on all minerals mined, produced, or otherwise recovered from the Company’s mining properties, for which the buyer paid $2,200,000 to the Company.

Consultant Settlement Agreement

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company terminated a consulting agreement and paid $600,000 to the consultant, with an agreement to pay an additional $200,000 within 18 months, and further agreed to pay $36,000 as a payment against the final shipment of ore by the Company. In addition, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock to the consultant. A principal of the consulting company was also appointed a director of the Company.

Repayment of Notes

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company repaid convertible promissory notes and short-term notes payable to two of its minority shareholders in the amount of $2,103,289 including interest and fees. In addition, all of the notes payable – equipment and the leased equipment liability note were paid in full.

Claim Acquisition

The Company entered into an agreement dated March 26, 2019 with Ben Julian, LLC for an option to purchase 64 claims adjacent to the Kiewit property for a purchase price of $500,000. On June 13, 2019, an agreement between the Company, Clifton Mining Company and Ben Julian, LLC was signed in which the purchase option was exercised. The Company acquired 20 claims and Clifton Mining Company acquired the remaining 44 claims at a cost of $250,000 to each company.


[OUTSIDE BACK COVER]

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

[A Nevada Corporation]

6,060,824 Shares

Common Stock

PROSPECTUS

Desert Hawk Gold Corp.

1290 Holcomb Ave.

Reno, NV 89502

Telephone (775) 337-8057

_______________, 2020

Until                            , 2020, all dealers that effect transactions in our shares, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution


The following is an itemized statement of the estimated amounts of all expenses payable by us in connection with the registration of the common stock,Common Stock, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. All amounts are estimates except the SEC registration fee.


Securities and Exchange Commission - Registration Fee $440 
State filing Fees $2,500 
Printing and Engraving Expenses $1,000 
Edgarizing Costs $10,000 
Accounting Fees and Expenses $15,000 
Legal Fees and Expenses $35,000 
Miscellaneous $6,060 
Total $70,000 

Securities and Exchange Commission - Registration Fee $315 
State filing Fees $2,500 
Edgarizing Costs $5,000 
Accounting Fees and Expenses $10,000 
Legal Fees and Expenses $20,000 
Miscellaneous $5,000 
Total $42,815 

None of the expenses of the offering will be paid by the selling security holders.


Selling Stockholders.

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers


Nevada law expressly authorizes a Nevada corporation to indemnify its directors, officers, employees, and agents against liabilities arising out of such persons’ conduct as directors, officers, employees, or agents if they acted in good faith, in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the company, and, in the case of criminal proceedings, if they had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. Generally, indemnification for such persons is mandatory if such person was successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any such proceeding, or in the defense of any claim, issue, or matter in the proceeding. In addition, as provided in the articles of incorporation, bylaws, or an agreement, the corporation may pay for or reimburse the reasonable expenses incurred by such a person who is a party to a proceeding in advance of final disposition if such person furnishes to the corporation an undertaking to repay such expenses if it is ultimately determined that he did not meet the requirements. In order to provide indemnification, unless ordered by a court, the corporation must determine that the person meets the requirements for indemnification. Such determination must be made by a majority of disinterested directors; by independent legal counsel; or by a majority of the shareholders.


Article IX of our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Article VIII of our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that the corporation shall indemnify its directors, officers, and agents to the full extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada. Our employment agreements with Robert E. Jorgensen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Rick Havenstrite, our President and CEO, also provideprovides for mandatory indemnification.


Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of our company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.


Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the past three years the registrant has sold the following securities which were not registered under the Securities Act:

Under the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated February 7, 2019, with Clifton Mining Company (“Clifton”), on or about March 7, 2019, we issued 5,500,000 shares of common stock to Clifton as partial consideration for entering into the amended lease agreement. Also, on or about March 7, 2019, we issued 250,000 shares to H&H Metals Corp. (“H&H”) for termination of a five-year agency agreement entered into on March 29, 2018. The shares issued to Clifton and H&H were issued without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(a)(5) and Section 4(a)(2) thereof, and Rule 506(b) promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering. At the time of the sale of the shares, the Company reasonably believed that each purchaser was an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the transactions.

II-1


In May 2008

During the past three-year period we commencedissued 300,000 shares each to West C Street LLC and Iberhouse LLC to satisfy penalty requirements under the loan documents with these entities. These shares were issued pursuant to Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Act. Management reasonably believed that at the time of issuance each investor was an offering“accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a) of 5,000,000 pre-reverse splitRegulation D. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the transaction.

From March through June 2018 we sold 2,125,000 shares of our common stock at $0.05$0.40 per share.  We completed the offering in September 2008 and sold 289,583 shares (3,475,008 pre-reverse split shares)share for gross proceeds of $173,750.$850,000. These shares were sold without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(6) and/or4(a)(5) and Section 4(2)4(a)(2) thereof, and Rule 506506(c) promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering. We filed a Form D withAt the Commission on May 30, 2008, for this offering.  Sales were made to a totaltime of 10 investors,the sale of the shares, we reasonably believed that each of whompurchaser was an accredited investor“accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D.  Each investor delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to these issuances and consented to the imposition of restrictive legends upon the stock certificates representing the shares.  Each investor represented that he or she had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting.  Each investor was afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the transaction. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock sale.


II-1


In July 2008,sales.

On March 8, 2018, we issued 8,3332,250,000 shares to each of common stockIbearhouse and West C Street in exchange for $312,500 from each to Ronald N. Vance, our outside legal counsel, Donna Street, our outside accountant, and William McAndrews, one of our directors, for services rendered.  All of the investors. This transaction also included concessions on their notes with the Company. Sales of these shares were issued under our 2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan without registration under the Securities Act by reasonmade pursuant to Rule 506(b) of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Rule 701Regulation D promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.   Each participantSEC under the Act. Management reasonably believed that at the time of sale each investor was an “accredited investor” as defined in the plan who received the sharesRule 501(a) of Regulation D. No selling commissions or other remuneration was a natural person who provided bona fide services to the company, which services were not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital raising transaction and not directly or indirectly used to promote or maintain a market for the company’s securities.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock award.


In May 2009 we commencedsales of these securities.

Effective February 23, 2018, our Board approved and adopted the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) pursuant to which 2,400,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were authorized. On February 23, 2018, the Board approved the grant of an offeringaggregate of 1,000,000 shares our common stock at $0.70 per share.  We completed the offering in August 2009 and sold 1,000,000 shares for gross proceeds of $700,000.  These shares were sold without registration2,400,000 options under the Securities Act by reason2018 Plan exercisable at $0.40 per share which terminate February 23, 2023 in the amounts and to the following:

Rick Havenstrite – 1,000,000 options;

Howard Crosby – 1,000,000 options;

John Ryan – 200,000 options; and

Linde Havenstrite – 200,000 options.

The issuances of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(6) and/or Section 4(2) thereof, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.  We filed a Form D with the Commission on May 12, 2009 for this offering.  Salesthese securities were made pursuant to a total of 28 investors, each of whom was an accredited investor as defined in Regulation D.  Each investor delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to these issuances and consented to the imposition of restrictive legends upon the stock certificates representing the shares.  Each investor represented that he or she had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting.  Each investor was afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the transaction.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock sale.


In July 2009 we entered into joint venture agreements with Clifton Mining and Moeller Family Trust for the rights to certain mining claims and issued 500,000 shares to Clifton Mining and 250,000 shares to Moeller Family Trust as consideration for entering into the mining ventures.  In September 2009 we also issued 60,824 to Clifton Mining for the transfer of surety bonds on the mining claims.  These shares were issued without registrationRule 701 under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(6) and/or Section 4(2) thereof, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.  We filed a Form D with the Commission on September 14, 2009 for this transaction.   Both Clifton Mining and Moeller Family Trust were accredited investors as defined in Regulation D.  Each party delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to these issuances and consented to the imposition of restrictive legends upon the stock certificates representing the shares.  Each party represented that it had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting.  Representatives of each party were afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the transaction.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock issuance.Act.

II-2


In September 2009 we commenced an offering of 440,000 shares our common stock at $0.70 per share.  We completed the offering in January 2010 and sold 436,300 shares for gross proceeds of $305,410.  These shares were sold without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(6) and/or Section 4(2) thereof, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.  We filed a Form D with the Commission on September 17, 2009 for this offering.  Sales were made to a total of eight investors, each of whom was an accredited investor as defined in Regulation D.  Each investor delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to these issuances and consented to the imposition of restrictive legends upon the stock certificates representing the shares.  Each investor represented that he or she had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting.  Each investor was afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the transaction.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock sale.

II-2


In November 2009 we issued 15% convertible promissory notes to Ibearhouse, LLC and West C Street, LLC in the principal amounts of $300,000 each.  Each note is due and payable on November 30, 2012.   Interest on each note is payable in monthly installments of $3,750.  Each note was originally convertible at $1.50 per share and on July 14, 2010, the conversion price was reduced to $0.70 per share.  The notes are convertible at any time prior to maturity.  In consideration of each loan, we issued 150,000 shares each to lenders.  The notes and shares were issued without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(6) and/or Section 4(2) thereof, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.  We filed a Form D with the Commission on November 30, 2009 for the original transaction to reflect a reduction in the conversion price to from $1.50 to $0.70 per share.  Each of the parties was an accredited investors as defined in Regulation D.  Each party delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to these issuances and consented to the imposition of restrictive legends upon the promissory notes and the stock certificates representing the shares.  Each party represented that it had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting.  Representatives of each party were afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the transaction.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the issuances of the notes and stock.

In November 2009 we awarded 25,000 shares each to Dave Jensen and Stan Kendall, two of our employees, as bonuses for their services.  These shares were issued under our 2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Rule 701 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.   Each participant in the plan who received the shares was a natural person who provided bona fide services to the company, which services were not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital raising transaction and not directly or indirectly used to promote or maintain a market for the company’s securities.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock award.

In December 2009 we completed the purchase of Blue Fin Capital, Inc. through the exchange of 2,713,636 shares of our common stock for all of the outstanding shares of Blue Fin.  These shares were issued without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(6) and/or Section 4(2) thereof, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.  We filed a Form D with the Commission on January 21, 2010.  Issuances were made to a total of 5 shareholders of Blue Fin, each of whom was an accredited investor as defined in Regulation D.  Each shareholder of Blue Fin delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to these issuances and consented to the imposition of restrictive legends upon the stock certificates representing the shares.  Each shareholder of Blue Fin represented that he or she had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting.  Each shareholder of Blue Fin was afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the transaction.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock exchange transaction.

In July 2010 we issued 958,033 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to DMRJ Group I, LLC under the terms of our Investment Agreement dated July 14, 2010.  These preferred shares are convertible into an equal number of common shares.  These shares were issued without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(6) and/or Section 4(2) thereof, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.  We filed a Form D with the Commission on July 19, 2010 for this transaction and filed an amended Form D on July 28, 2010, to correct a typographical error.  DMRJ Group was an accredited investor as defined in Regulation D at the time of the transaction.  DMRJ Group delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to the shares and consented to the imposition of restrictive legends upon the stock certificate representing the shares.  It had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting.  Representatives of DMRJ Group were afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the transaction.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the preferred stock transaction.

II-3


In July 2010 we issued 25,000 shares to Marianne Havenstrite, wife of Rick Havenstrite, our president, for accounting services.  We also issued 15,000 shares to Linda Miller as a bonus for services performed on our Gold Hill project.  Further, we issued 60,000 shares to O. Jay Gatten, Brian G. Vinton, Oren S. Gatten, and Douglas D. Jensen, principals and employees of North American Exploration as incentive to perform permitting services for us on our Gold Hill project.  We further issued 400,000 shares to John Ryan, one of our directors, for accepting appointment as a director and for his prior services as a director.  All of the shares were issued under our 2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Rule 701 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.   Each participant in the plan who received the shares was a natural person who provided bona fide services to the company, which services were not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital raising transaction and not directly or indirectly used to promote or maintain a market for the company’s securities.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock awards.

In September 2010 we issued 5,000 shares to Jamie Lloyd, legal assistant to Ronald N. Vance, our outside legal counsel, and 6,667 shares to Mr. Vance as bonuses for assisting management of the company with maintaining its corporate books and records.  All of the shares were issued under our 2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Rule 701 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.   Each participant in the plan who received the shares was a natural person who provided bona fide services to the company, which services were not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital raising transaction and not directly or indirectly used to promote or maintain a market for the company’s securities.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with the stock awards.

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

    Incorporated by Reference 
Exhibit Number
 
 
Exhibit Description
 Form  File No.  Exhibit 
 
Filing Date
Filed Here-with
2.1 & 10.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 30, 2009, with Blue Fin Capital, Inc.  S-1   333-169701  2.1 &10.1 9/30/10 
 3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation  S-1   333-169701   3.1 9/30/10 
 3.2 Certificate of Designations for Series A Preferred Stock  S-1   333-169701   3.2 9/30/10 
 3.3 Current Bylaws  S-1   333-169701   3.3 9/30/10 
 4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate  S-1   333-169701   4.1 9/30/10 
 4.2 Form of Registration Rights Agreements, including list of selling shareholders  S-1   333-169701   4.2 9/30/10 
4.3 & 10.2 2008 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, including grant forms  S-1   333-169701  4.3 &10.2 9/30/10 
 4.4 Series A Preferred Stock Certificate  S-1   333-169701   4.4 9/30/10 
 4.5 Registration Rights Agreement dated July 14, 2010, with DMRJ Group I, LLC  S-1   333-169701   4.5 9/30/10 
 4.6 Lockup and Leak-Out Agreement dated July 24, 2009, with Clifton Mining Company  S-1   333-169701   5.6 9/30/10 
 4.7 Lockup and Leak-Out Agreement dated July 24, 2009, with Moeller Family Trust  S-1   333-169701   4.7 9/30/10 
 5.1 Opinion re Legality of Shares  S-1   333-169701   5.1 9/30/10 
II-4

     
Incorporated by Reference
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
  
Form
   
File No.
   
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
Filed Here-with
 10.3 Amended and Restated Lease and Sublease Agreement effective July 24, 2009, with Clifton Mining Company and Woodman Mining Company  S-1   333-169701   10.3 9/30/10 
 10.4 Contract Assignment and Surety Transfer Agreement dated September 30, 2009, with Clifton Mining Company  S-1   333-169701   10.4 9/30/10 
 10.5 Amended and Restated Lease Agreement effective July 24, 2009, with Moeller Family Trust  S-1   333-169701   10.5 9/30/10 
 10.6 Investment Agreement dated July 14, 2010, with DMRJ Group I, LLC   S-1/A    333-169701    10.6 11/12/10 
 10.7 Form of Promissory Note dated July 14, 2010, to DMRJ Group I, LLC  S-1   333-169701   10.7 9/30/10 
 10.8 Security Agreement dated July 14, 2010, with DMRJ Group I, LLC  S-1   333-169701   10.8 9/30/10 
 10.9 Pledge Agreement dated July 14, 2010, with DMRJ Group I, LLC  S-1   333-169701   10.9 9/30/10 
 10.10 Loan Agreement dated November 18, 2009, with West C Street LLC and Ibearhouse LLC  S-1   333-169701   10.10 9/30/10 
 10.11 Amended Loan Agreement dated July 14, 2010, with West C Street LLC and Ibearhouse LLC  S-1   333-169701   10.11 9/30/10 
 10.12 Amended and Restated 15% Convertible Promissory Note dated July 14, 2010 with West C Street LLC  S-1   333-169701   10.12 9/30/10 
 10.13 Amended and Restated 15% Convertible Promissory Note dated July 14, 2010 with Ibearhouse LLC  S-1   333-169701   10.13 9/30/10 
 10.14 Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2010, with Robert E. Jorgensen*  S-1   333-169701   10.14 9/30/10 
 10.15 Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2010, with Rick Havenstrite*  S-1   333-169701   10.15 9/30/10 
 10.16 Consulting Agreement dated September 1, 2010, with Eric L. Moe*  S-1   333-169701   10.16 9/30/10 
 10.17 Consulting Agreement dated December 28, 2009 with Stuart Havenstrite  S-1   333-169701   10.17 9/30/10 
 10.18 Rental Agreement effective October 1, 2010, with Robert E. Jorgensen   S-1/A    333-169701    10.18 11/12/10 
 10.19 Rental Agreement effective October 1, 2009, with RMH Overhead, LLC   S-1/A    333-169701    10.19  
11/12/10
 
 10.20 Amendment dated November 8, 2010 to Investment Agreement dated July 14, 2010, with DMRJ Group I, LLC   S-1/A    333-169701    10.20  
11/12/10
 
 21.1 List of Subsidiaries  S-1   333-169701   21.1 9/30/10 
 23.1 Consent of Child, Van Wagoner & Bradshaw, PLLC, independent registered public accounting firm             X
 23.2 Consent of Attorney (included in Exhibit 5.1)             --
 23.3 Consent of McClelland Laboratories   S-1/A    333-169701    23.3  
11/12/10
 

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed Herewith
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation filed March 1, 2010 S-1 333-169701 3.1 9/30/10  
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws dated May 3, 2011 8-K 333-169701 3.2 5/9/11  
5.1 Opinion re Legality of Shares         X
10.1 Pre-paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement dated March 7, 2019 (confidential information has been redacted) 10-K  333-169701 10.1   7/30/19  
10.2 Leasehold Deed of Trust dated March 7, 2019 10-K  333-169701  10.2  7/30/19  
10.3 Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement effective March 7, 2019 10-K  333-169701  10.3  7/30/19  
10.4 Registration Rights Agreement effective March 7, 2019 10-K  333-169701  10.4  7/30/19  
10.5 Conveyance of Net Smelter Returns Royalty Interest effective March 7, 2019 10-Q 333-169701 99.1 2/3/20  
10.6 Agency Agreement dated March 29, 2018, with H&H Metals Corp. 8-K 333-169701  99.6 3/13/19  
10.7 Termination Agreement dated January 16, 2019, with H&H Metals Corp. 8-K 333-169701  99.7 3/13/19  
10.8 Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2010, with Rick Havenstrite* S-1 333-169701 10.15 9/30/10  
10.9 Amendment No. 1 dated effective May 1, 2019 to the Employment Agreement with Rick Havenstrite* 8-K 333-169701 99.1 7/22/19  
10.10 Rental Agreement effective October 1, 2009, with RMH Overhead, LLC S-1A 333-169701 10.19 11/12/10  
10.11 Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated February 13, 2018 10-K  333-169701 10.11   7/30/19  
10.12 Equipment Lease Agreement dated June 20, 2016 with RMH Overhead, LLC 10-K 333-169701 10.36 6/29/18  
10.13 Ben Julian LLC Option Agreement dated March 26, 2019 10-K  333-169701  10.13  7/30/19  
10.14 Letter Agreement dated June 7, 2019, with Clifton Mining Company 10-K  333-169701  10.14  7/30/19  
10.15 Amendment No.1 to the Pre-Paid Forward Gold Purchase Agreement dated October 31, 2019 (confidential information has been redacted)         X
23.1 Consent of DeCoria, Maichel & Teague, P.S., independent registered public accounting firm         X
23.2 Consent of Attorney (included in Exhibit 5.1)         --

*Management contract, or compensatory plan or arrangement, required to be filed as an exhibit.


II-3

II-5



Item 17. Undertakings


The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:


(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:


(i) Include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;


(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high and of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the CommissionSEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.


(iii) Include any material or changed information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or ana material change to such information in the registration statement.


(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.


(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.


(4) Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness.Provided,however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.


(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 of Regulation C of the Securities Act;


(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;


(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and


II-6


(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.


Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

II-4


[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]

II-7

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act, of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has duly causedreasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-1 and authorized this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Spokane, Washington,Reno, Nevada, on JanuaryFebruary 12, 2011.


2020.

 Desert Hawk Gold Corp.
By:/s/ Robert E. JorgensenDESERT HAWK GOLD CORP.
  Robert E. Jorgensen, CEO
Date: February 12, 2020By:/s/ Rick Havenstrite
Rick Havenstrite, Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated.


Name
NAME
 
Title
TITLE
 
Date
DATE
     
/s/ Robert E. Jorgensen
Howard Crosby
 Director and Chairman & CEO (Principal 
JanuaryFebruary 12, 2011
2020
Robert E. JorgensenExecutive, Financial, and Accounting
Officer)
/s/ Rick Havenstrite
President & Director
January 12, 2011
Rick HavenstriteHoward Crosby    
     
/s/ Robert E. Knecht
Rick Havenstrite
 Director, President, and CEO 
JanuaryFebruary 12, 2011
2020
Robert E. KnechtRick Havenstrite (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ William  McAndrews
John P. Ryan
 Director 
JanuaryFebruary 12, 2011
William McAndrews
/s/ John Ryan
Director
January 12, 2011
2020
John P. Ryan    
     
/s/ Eric L. Moe
Phillip H. Holme
 Director 
JanuaryFebruary 12, 2011
2020
Eric L. MoePhillip H. Holme    
/s/ Marianne HavenstriteTreasurerFebruary 12, 2020
Marianne Havenstrite(Principle Financial and Accounting Officer)

II-5

 
II-8