As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 20162, 2020.

Registration No. 333-211045333-             

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Amendment No. 3 to

FormFORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada 36743089 39-207569330-0680177
(State or other jurisdiction of
(Primary Standard Industrial(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)No.)

 

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.5899 Preston Road #505, Frisco, TX

3333 Pinnacle Hills Parkway I Suite 220(479) 259-2977

Rogers, AR 72758

(479) 259-2979

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

Randy S. May

Chief Executive Officer

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.

3333 Pinnacle Hills Parkway I Suite 2205899 Preston Road #505, Frisco, TX

Rogers, AR 72758(479) 259-2977

(479) 259-2979

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copies to:

Peter DiChiara,Ross D. Carmel, Esq.

Arif Soto, Esq.

Carmel, Milazzo & DiChiaraFeil LLP

261 Madison Avenue, 955 W 39th Street, 18th Floor

New York, NY 10016New York 10018

(212) 658-0458

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:

As soon as practicalpracticable after this registration statement becomesRegistration Statement is declared effective.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Formform are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box.box:

 

If this Formform is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

 

If this Formform is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

 

If this Formform is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company” and “company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer ☐Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered Amount to be Registered (1)  Proposed Maximum Offering Price per Share (2)  Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price  Amount of Registration Fee 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share  4,336,625  $18.00  $78,059,250  $7,860.57 
Total Common Stock underlying Warrants  4,336,625  $18.00  $78,059,250  $7,860.57 
Total Registration Fee         $156,118,500  $15,721.14#
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered 

Amount to be

Registered(1)

  

Proposed

Maximum

Offering
Price per

Share(2)

  

Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate
Offering

Price(2)

  

Amount of

Registration
Fee

 
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share, upon exercise of warrants(3)  5,882,358  $1.10  $6,470,593.80  $839.88 
                 
Total:  5,882,358  $1.10  $6,470,593.80  $839.88 

 

(1)This Registration Statement covers the resale by certain selling securityholders named herein of (i) up to 4,336,625 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and (ii) up to 4,336,6255,882,358 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants that were issued to the selling securityholders in connection with a private placement. securityholders.

(2)Calculated in accordance withEstimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

#(3)$4,176.17 previously paidRepresents 5,882,358 shares of common stock that the Registrant expects could be issuable upon exercise of certain warrants to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share.

 

The registrantRegistrant hereby amends this registration statementRegistration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrantRegistrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statementRegistration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, or until this registration statementthe Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securitiesThe selling stockholders may not be soldsell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities nor doesand it seekis not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdictionstate where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUSSUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JULY 6, 2016

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JULY 2, 2020

 

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.PROSPECTUS

8,673,250 Shares of Common Stock

 

Up to 5,882,358 Shares

Common Stock

This prospectus relates to the resaleoffer and sale from time to time by the selling securityholdersstockholders identified in this prospectus, or the Selling Stockholders, of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. named herein purchased in an offeringup to5,882,358 shares, or the Warrant Shares, of units which ended on April 28, 2016. In this offering, we offered units for $4.00 per unit, consisting of one share ofour common stock and a warrant to purchase one shareissuable upon exercise of common stock for $5.00. The selling securityholders may sell up to 8,673,250 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. These shares include (i) 4,336,625 shares of issued andcertain outstanding common stock currently held by the selling securityholders and (ii) 4,336,625 shares of common stock currently underlying certain warrants held by the selling securityholders which, in each case, were initially issued and sold in a private placement offering that closed on April 28, 2016 (collectively the “Private Offering”). The Company received $17.3 million from the Private Offering which it is using for general working capital purposes. The warrants entitle the holders thereof to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to $5.00 per share, subject to adjustment for stock splits or corporate reorganizations.warrants.

 

The registrationshares of our common stock registered hereby may be offered and sold by the Selling Stockholders from time to time in the over-the-counter market or other national securities exchange or automated interdealer quotation system on which our common stock is then listed or quoted, or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If the shares of common stock hereunder does not mean that any ofare sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling securityholdersSelling Stockholders will actually offerbe responsible for underwriting discounts or sell the full number of shares being registered pursuant to this prospectus.commissions or agent’s commissions. The selling securityholders may sell the shares of common stock tomay be registered hereby fromsold in one or more transactions at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time to time. We will, however, receive the exercise price of the warrants if and when the warrants are exercised for cash by the securityholders. The selling securityholders may offer and sell the shares in a variety of transactions described under the heading “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 16, including transactions on any stock exchange, market or facility on which the common stock may be traded, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwisesale, at marketvarying prices prevailingdetermined at the time of sale, at prices related to such market prices or at negotiated prices. See “Plan of Distribution.”

 

We are not selling any securities covered byshares of common stock under this prospectus, and we will not receive any of the proceeds from the offer and sale of shares of our common stock by the selling securityholders.Selling Stockholders. We will, however, receive approximately $21.683 millionproceeds from the selling securityholders if they exercise all of the warrants on a cash basis (assuming, in each case, no adjustments are made to the exercise price or number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants),Warrants if and when they are exercised in cash. See “Use of Proceeds.”

This prospectus describes the general manner in which we expect we would use primarily for working capital purposes. We are registering the common stock on behalf of the selling securityholders. We are bearing all of the expenses in connection with the registration of the shares of common stock but all sellingmay be offered and other expenses incurredsold by any Selling Stockholders. When the selling securityholders, including commissionsSelling Stockholders sell shares of common stock under this prospectus, we may, if necessary and discounts, ifrequired by law, provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that offering. Any prospectus supplement may also add to, update, modify or replace information contained in this prospectus. We urge you to read carefully this prospectus, any attributable to the sale or dispositionaccompanying prospectus supplement and any documents we incorporate by such selling securityholders will be borne by them.

reference into this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement before you make your investment decision.

 

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB which is maintained by the OTC Market Group Inc. under the symbol “EARK”.“ZEST.” On July 1, 2016,June 30, 2020, the closinglast reported sale price as reported by the OTC Market Group Inc. was $18.00 per share. This price will fluctuate based on the demand for our common stock. We filed an application forof our common stock to be listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market.was $3.10 per share.

 

Investing in our common stock and warrants involves a high degree of risk. SeePlease read “Risk Factors” beginning on page 48 of thisthe prospectus.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined ifpassed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus is truthful or complete.prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

Prospectus datedThe date of this prospectus is July            , 20162020

 

 

Business to Business Products and Services Provider

 

 

AppliedRetailKnowledge.

Intelleflex– Intelligent, On-Demand Solutions for Retailers and Companies that Ship and Store Products

Eco3D- 3D Mapping, Modeling, and Consulting Services for Retailers and Other Clients

Pioneer Products - Recovering Plastic Waste from Retail Supply Chains and Creating New Consumer Products with the Reclaimed Material

Magnolia Solar – Leveraging Nanotechnology to Increase the Performance of Retail Products

Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY1
RISK FACTORS48
SPECIALCAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA1024
SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS11
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE16
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION16
USE OF PROCEEDS1725
MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCKDIVIDEND POLICY1825
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS25
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS1927
BUSINESS2436
PROPERTIES30
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS30
MANAGEMENT3139
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEEXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND MANAGEMENT3440
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION3744
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS47
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSONPARTY TRANSACTIONS3848
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT39
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCKSECURITIES3949
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION50
LEGAL MATTERS4051
EXPERTS4051
ADDITIONALWHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION4151
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-1

You should rely only onNeither we nor the selling stockholders have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus andor in any free writing prospectus supplement prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized anyoneNeither we nor the selling stockholders take responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to provide you withthe reliability of, any other information that is different. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistentothers may give you. The information you should not rely upon it. This prospectus is not an offer to sell, nor are the selling securityholders seeking an offer to buy, securities in any state where such offer or solicitation is not permitted. The informationcontained in this prospectus or in any applicable free writing prospectus is complete and accuratecurrent only as of theits date, on the front cover of this prospectus, regardless of theits time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our common stock.shares. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since these dates.that date.

 

For investors outside the United States: neither we nor any of the selling securityholders have done anything that would permitWe use our registered trademarks and trade names, such as Zest™, in this offering or possession or distribution ofprospectus. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action forappear without the ® and ™ symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relatingwe will not assert, to the offeringfullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or that the applicable owner will not assert its rights, to these trademarks and trade names. We do not intend our use or display of sharesother companies’ trade names or trademarks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of our common stock and warrants and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States.us by, any other companies.

 

Except as otherwise indicated herein or asUnless the context requires otherwise, requires, references in this prospectus to “Ecoark Holdings,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and“our,” “our company,” “Ecoark Holdings,” or similar referencesterminology refer to Ecoark Holdings, Inc.

 

On March 18, 2016, we effected a 1-for-250 reverse stock split. Unless context indicates or otherwise requires, all share numbers and share price data included in this prospectus have been adjusted to give effect to that reverse stock split.i

 

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

 

The followingThis summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus, and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information and financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in our common stock. Before you decide to investThis summary is qualified in our common stock, youits entirety by, and should be read and carefully consider the following summary togetherin conjunction with, the entire prospectus, including our financial statements and the related notes theretomore detailed information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read this entire prospectus andcarefully, including the matters discussedinformation set forth in the sections in this prospectus entitledtitled “Risk Factors,” “Summary Consolidated Financial Data”Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Some of theOperations” and our financial statements and related notes thereto contained in this prospectus, constitute forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See the section in this prospectus entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those discussed in the “Risk Factors” and other sections of this prospectus.(Note: All dollar amounts, except for shares, included in this Prospectus are rounded to thousands.)before making an investment decision.

Our Company

 

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.Dollar amounts and number of shares below are expressed in thousands, except per share amounts.

General Corporate History

 

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 19, 2007 under the name Magnolia Star Corporation (“Magnolia Star”). On March 24, 2016, Magnolia consummated a reverse merger with Ecoark, Holdings”Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ecoark”), pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January 29, 2016 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among, Magnolia Solar, Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Magnolia Star (the “Merger Sub”), and Ecoark. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Ecoark with Ecoark surviving the Merger and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). At the effective time of the Merger, each share of issued and outstanding Ecoark common stock was automatically converted into 0.5 shares of Magnolia Star common stock. On March 18, 2016, Magnolia Star filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada thereby changing its name to Ecoark Holdings, Inc.

The Merger was intended to constitute a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In accordance with the accounting treatment for a “reverse merger,” the Company’s historical financial statements prior to the Merger was replaced with the historical financial statements of Ecoark prior to the Merger. The financial statements after completion of the reverse merger include the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the combined company from and after the closing date of the reverse merger, with only certain aspects of pre-consummation stockholders’ equity remaining in the consolidated financial statements.

On March 31, 2020, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada therein increasing the number of its authorized shares of common stock from 100,000 to 200,000 shares, effective March 31, 2020. The increase was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its annual stockholders meeting held on February 27, 2020. The 5,000 authorized shares of “blank check” preferred stock were unchanged.

Overview

Ecoark Holdings is a diversified holding company incorporated in the state of Nevada corporation incorporated on November 19, 2007. Ecoark Holdings is an innovative, emerging growth company focused on the development and deployment of business solutions and products to the retail, agriculture, food service, commercial real estate and architecture, engineering and construction end markets. Ecoark Holdings has assembled a team and portfolio of proprietary, patented technologies to address the waste in operations, logistics and supply chain. Ecoark Holdings accomplishes this through twofour wholly-owned operating subsidiaries,subsidiaries: Ecoark, Inc. (“Ecoark”), a Delaware corporation which is the parent of Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs”), 440IoT Inc., a Nevada corporation (“440IoT”), Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”), and Magnolia Solar, IncTrend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Magnolia Solar”Trend Holdings”). Further, Ecoark has three operating entities: Intelleflex, Eco3D and Pioneer Products.

 

Our principal executive offices are located at 3333 Pinnacle Hills Parkway, Suite 220, Rogers, Arkansas 72758,Through its subsidiaries, the Company is engaged in three separate and our telephonedistinct business segments: (i) technology; (ii) commodities; and (iii) financial.

Zest Labs offers the Zest Fresh solution, a breakthrough approach to quality management of fresh food, is specifically designed to help substantially reduce the $161 billion amount of food loss the U.S. experiences each year.

Banner Midstream is engaged in oil and gas exploration, production and drilling operations on over 10,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Banner Midstream also provides transportation and logistics services and procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors.

Trend Holding’s primary asset is Trend Discovery Capital Management. Trend Discovery Capital Management provides services and collects fees from entities. Trend Holdings invests in a select number is (479) 259-2979. Our website address is http://ecoarkusa.com/. Our website and the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in, and are not consideredof early stage startups each year as part of this prospectus. You should not rely on any such information in making your decision to purchase our common stock.the fund’s Venture Capital strategy.

 

On December 31, 2009, Ecoark Holdings, originally known as Mobilis Relocation Services, Inc. (“Mobilis”), entered into an Agreement440IoTis a cloud and mobile software developer based near Boston, Massachusetts and is a software development and information solutions provider for cloud, mobile, and IoT (Internet of Merger and Plan of Reorganization with Magnolia Solar, a privately held Delaware corporation and Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corp. Upon closing of the transaction, under the Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization, Magnolia Solar became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mobilis. Thereafter, Mobilis changed its name to Magnolia Solar Corporation. The name was later changed to Ecoark Holdings, Inc. as described below.Things) applications.

1

Developments During Fiscal 2020

 

Acquisition of Ecoark, Inc.Trend Discovery

 

Prior toOn May 31, 2019, the acquisition of Ecoark, Ecoark Holdings’ operations were through Magnolia Solar which operations are described below.

On January 29, 2016, Ecoark HoldingsCompany entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Ecoark.Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) for the Company to acquire 100% of Trend Holdings pursuant to a merger of Trend Holdings with and into the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed on the May 31, 2019 and as agreed in the Merger Agreement, the Company is the surviving entity in the Merger and the separate corporate existence of Trend Holdings has ceased to exist.

Trend Holding’s primary asset is Trend Discovery Capital Management. Trend Discovery Capital Management provides services and collects fees from entities including Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I. Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I invest in securities. Neither Trend Holdings nor Trend Discovery Capital Management invest in securities or have any role in the purchase of securities by Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I. In the near-term, Trend Discovery LP’s performance will be driven by its investment in Volans-i, a fully autonomous vertical takeoff and landing (“VTOL”) drone delivery platform. Trend Discovery LP currently owns approximately 1% of Volans-i and has participation rights to future financings to maintain its ownership at 1% indefinitely. More information can be found at flyvoly.com.

The Company does not intend to acquire any other companies in the financial services industry.

Acquisition of Banner Midstream Corp.

On March 27, 2020, the Company acquired Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”), pursuant a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 27, 2020 (the “Banner Purchase Agreement”), between the Company and Banner Energy Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation and former parent company of Banner Midstream (“Banner Parent”). Pursuant to the MergerBanner Purchase Agreement, Ecoark merged withthe Company acquired 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Banner Midstream in consideration for 8,945 shares of common stock of the Company valued at $0.544 per share and into a subsidiaryassumed up to $11,774 in short-term and long-term debt of Ecoark Holdings (the “Merger”). EcoarkBanner Midstream and Magnolia Solar, Inc. continue as the subsidiaries and businesses of Ecoark Holdings.its subsidiaries.

 

PriorBanner Midstream has four operating subsidiaries: Pinnacle Frac Transport LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Pinnacle Frac”); Capstone Equipment Leasing LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Capstone”); White River Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation (“White River”); and Shamrock Upstream Energy LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Shamrock”). Pinnacle Frac provides transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations. Capstone procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors. These two operating subsidiaries of Banner Midstream are revenue producing entities. White River and Shamrock are engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, and drilling operations on over 10,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

The Company issued 8,945 shares of common stock (which Banner Parent issued to certain of its noteholders) and assumed $11,774 in debt and lease liabilities of Banner Midstream, per the completionBanner Purchase Agreement. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and another director recused themselves from all board discussions on the acquisition of Banner Midstream as they are stockholders and/or noteholders of Banner Midstream. The transaction was approved by all of the Mergerdisinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Chairman and CEO of Banner Parent is a former officer of the Company and is currently the Principal Accounting Officer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer and President of Banner Midstream.

Commitment on Secured Funding

The Company has secured a commitment for a $35 million long-term loan from an institutional lender to make additional investments in the energy sector. The supply-side shock from OPEC production increases coupled with the demand-side impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is continuing to drive oil prices to historic lows, resulting in unprecedented investment opportunities. This financing positions the Company to take advantage of these unique investment opportunities in the energy market. The loan commitment specifies a 20-year term and will carry a 6.25% interest rate. The agreement is pending final review and is not guaranteed to close.

Conversion of Credit Facility to Common Shares

The Company converted all principal and interest in Trend SPV’s credit facility into shares of the Company’s common stock on March 24, 2016,31, 2020. The conversion of approximately $2,525 of principal and $290 of accrued interest resulted in the issuance of 3,855 shares of common stock at a value of $0.59 per share. This transaction resulted in a special shareholder meeting on March 18, 2016, the following actions to amend the Articlesgain of Incorporation were undertaken by Ecoark Holdings to:$541 upon conversion.

Recent Developments

 

 1.effect a changeOn April 15, 2020, the Company issued 200 warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company for $0.73 per share in consideration for extending the maturity date of the senior secured debt assumed by the Company in the name of our company from Magnolia Solar Corporation to Ecoark Holdings Inc.;Banner Midstream acquisition consummated on March 27, 2020.

 

 2.effectOn April 15, 2020, the Company granted 50 warrants with an exercise price of $0.73 per share in consideration for extending the maturity date of the senior secured debt assumed by the Company in the Banner Midstream acquisition to March 27, 2020. The Company does not believe this transaction constitutes an accounting extinguishment of debt due to a reverse stock splitmaterial modification of our common stock by a ratiothe debt instrument.

2

On April 16, 2020, the Company received $386 in Payroll Protection Program (“PPP”) established as part of one-for-two hundred fifty shares (1the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) relating to Ecoark Holdings. On April 13, 2020, the Company received $1,482 in PPP funds under the CARES Act for 250);Pinnacle Frac.

 

 3.effectOn May 1, 2020, an increase in the numberinstitutional investor elected to convert its remaining shares of our authorizedSeries B Preferred Stock into an aggregate of 161 shares of common stock par value $0.001 per share, to 100,000,000; andof the Company.

 

 4.effectOn April 1 and May 5, 2020, two institutional investors elected to convert their 1 share of Series C Preferred Stock of the creation of 5,000,000Company into 1,379 shares of “blank check” preferred stock.common stock of the Company.

 

After giving effect to the Merger and the issuance of common stock to the shareholders of Ecoark, the shareholders of Ecoark received 95.34% of the shares of Ecoark Holding’s common stock (27,696,066 shares out of 29,047,062 shares).

On May 6, 2020, the Company granted 100 non-qualified stock options to a consultant.

On May 8 and May 14, the Company issued 25 and 35 shares of common stock for the extension of this not and accrued interest valued at $45. The Company recognized a loss of $13 on this issuance and conversion.

On May 10, 2020, the Company entered into letter agreements with accredited institutional investors holding an aggregate of 1,379 warrants issued on November 13, 2019 with an exercise price of $0.725 per share and aggregate of 5,882 warrants with and exercise price of $0.90 per share (collectively, the “Existing Warrants”). The shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Existing Warrants were registered for resale pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-235456) declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2020. In consideration for the investors exercising in full all of the Existing Warrants on or before May 18, 2020, the Company issued to the investors new warrants to purchase up to 5,882 shares of common stock (the number of shares issued upon the exercise of the $0.90 warrants) and substantially in the form of the original $0.90 warrants, except that the exercise price is $1.10 per share. Between May 11, 2020 and May 18, 2020, the Company received $6,294 from the investors’ cash exercise of the Existing Warrants.

On May 18, 2020, the Company granted 50 warrants with an exercise price of $0.73 per share in consideration for extending the maturity date of the senior secured debt assumed by the Company in the Banner Midstream acquisition to March 27, 2020. The Company does not believe this transaction constitutes an accounting extinguishment of debt due to a material modification of the debt instrument.

Between May 11 and June 15, 2020, (a) the Company repaid long-term debt of $2,851 in cash; (b) converted $397 in long-term debt, plus $35 in accrued interest into 592 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $408 on this transaction; (c) repaid $140 in cash and converted $17 of amounts due to prior owners into 23 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $16 on this transaction; (d) converted $200 in long-term debt and $15 in accrued interest into 295 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $213 on this transaction; (e) repaid $3 and converted $507 of a vendor payable into 461 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $161 on this transaction; and (f) repaid $75 in cash and converted $825 in amounts due to prior owners into 1,130 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $350 on this transaction.

Between May 29, 2020 and June 1, 2020, the Company issued an aggregate of 319 shares of common stock upon the exercise of non-qualified stock options for aggregate proceeds of $203.

Between May 29, 2020 and June 3, 2020, an aggregate of 127 stock options granted under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan were exercised for aggregate proceeds of $117.

On June 11, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SR Acquisition I, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction, includes the transfer of 262 total wells in Mississippi and Louisiana, approximately 9,000 acres of active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment. The 262 total wells include 57 active producing wells, 19 active disposal wells, 136 shut-in with future utility wells, and 50 shut-in pending plugging wells. Included in the assignment are 4 wells in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale formation.

On June 18, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SN TMS, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of wells, active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment.

Between June 19 and June 22, 2020, there were 395 warrants exercised for $399. Of these 400 warrants, 187 of them were cashless exercises.

 

1

3

 

Description of Business Model

Ecoark Holdings

Ecoark Holdings operates through four subsidiaries:

 

Intelleflex®Zest Labs

 

Intelleflex's ZEST Data ServicesZest Labs offers freshness management solutions for fresh food growers, suppliers, processors, distributors, grocers and restaurants. Its Zest Fresh solution is a secure, multi-tenant cloud-based data collection platform for aggregatingpost-harvest shelf-life and real-time permission-based sharing and analysis of information. ZEST Fresh, a fresh foodfreshness management solution that utilizesimproves delivered freshness of produce and protein and reduces post-harvest losses at the ZEST Data Service platform,retailer due to temperature handling and processing by 50% or more by intelligently matching customer freshness requirements with actual product freshness. It focuses on threefour primary value propositions – operational efficiency, consistent food quality,freshness, reduced waste, and improved food safety. ZESTZest Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence on every pallet. ZESTat a pallet level. Zest Labs also offers its Zest Delivery solution that provides real-time monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food.

 

On June 6, 2019, Zest Labsannounced a strategic collaboration between AgroFresh and Zest Labs to strengthen their end-to-end solutions. AgroFresh will incorporate Zest Labs’ Zest Fresh™ solution into its FreshCloud™ Transit Insights platform. The agreement will utilize both companies’ resources and strengths to provide customers with a comprehensive solution that improves operations, increases visibility into produce shelf-life and reduces food waste.

Zest Labs was incorporated in the State of Delaware on September 23, 2004 under the name Intelleflex Corporation. Effective on October 28, 2016, Intelleflex Corporation changed its name to Zest Labs, Inc. to align its corporate name with its mission and the brand name of its products and services.

The Zest Fresh value proposition is to reduce fresh food loss by improving quality consistency. In the U.S. produce market, it is reported that roughly 30% of post-harvest fresh food is lost or wasted and therefore not consumed. Both fresh food producers and retailers bear significant expense when harvested food is either rejected due to early spoilage or reduced in value due to early ripening. Zest Labs believes that a significant portion of this waste can be attributed to inconsistent quality or freshness based on variable post-harvest processing and handling. Fresh food producers and retailers manage food distribution and inventory based on the harvest date, with the assumption that all food harvested on the same day will have the same freshness. However, studies have shown that harvest conditions and post-harvest handling can have a significant effect on the actual remaining freshness and, if not properly accounted for, can result in food loss or spoilage ahead of expectations. Zest Fresh empowers fresh food producers and retailers to significantly reduce the post-harvest loss by providing real-time guidance to process adherence, intelligent distribution and best handling practices, with a goal of providing significant financial savings to fresh food producers and retailers.

Zest Labs has developed the industry’s first freshness metric called the Zest Intelligent Pallet Routing Code (“ZIPR Code”). The ZIPR Code has three main components: (i) Harvest Quality which sets total freshness capacity (for example, 12 days for strawberries), (ii) Handling Impact which reflects aging acceleration due to improper handling, and (iii) Future Handling which accurately reflects how the product will be handled (for example, store shelf temperature may be 40 degrees Fahrenheit instead of the ideal 34 degrees Fahrenheit).

Zest Fresh is offered to fresh food producers, processors, distributors, restaurants and grocers with pricing based on the number of pallets managed by Zest Fresh, typically from the field harvest through retail grocery delivery. The Zest Fresh service includes a re-usable wireless Internet of Things (“IoT”) condition sensor that travels with the pallet of fresh food from the field or processor through retail delivery, continuously collecting product condition data. The collected pallet product data is analyzed, using artificial intelligence-based predictive analytics in real time by the Zest Fresh cloud-based solution, with the fresh food producers and retailers accessing data through Zest Fresh web and mobile applications. Zest Fresh provides workers with real-time feedback on the current handling or processing of each pallet, empowering best practice adherence to achieve maximum freshness. Zest Fresh also provides dynamic updates as to actual product freshness for each pallet, enabling intelligent routing and inventory management of each pallet in a manner that ensures optimum delivered freshness. Zest Fresh also includes integrated blockchain support to grower and shipper customers via the Zest Fresh platform.

Zest Labs’ Zest Delivery solution helps to manage prepared food delivery from the restaurant through to the customer. Zest Delivery manages the delivery container environment, both monitoring and controlling the product condition. The value of Zest Delivery is to manage prepared meals in an ideal state for consumption, while accommodating extended pre-staging or delivery times. Extended pre-staging times are associated with “instant delivery” services of prepared meals, where the meals are often pre-staged in a delivery area ahead of demand. While pre-staging enables fast demand response time, it can result in prepared meals being staged for extended periods, which can potentially impact quality, value and safety. Zest Delivery monitors and controls the delivery container environment to preserve the prepared meal in ideal, ready to consume condition. Zest Delivery also provides the dispatcher with real-time remote visibility to the condition of available meals and confirming quality prior to dispatch. Zest Delivery provides automated, real-time visibility for a very distributed fleet of drivers, reflecting prepared meal food safety, quality and availability. Zest Delivery is offered to meal delivery companies based on the quantity of delivery containers and frequency of use.

Zest Labs currently holds rights to 69 U.S. patents (with additional patents pending), numerous related foreign patents, and U.S. copyrights relating to certain aspects of its Zest software, hardware devices including Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”) technology, software, and services. In addition, Zest Labs has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services,” and the Zest, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery logos, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Many of Zest Labs’ products have been designed to include licensed intellectual property obtained from third-parties. Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates.

4

Although most components essential to Zest Labs’ business are generally available from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID or other wireless custom integrated circuits, and application-specific integrated circuits are currently obtained by Zest Labs from single or limited sources, principally in Asia.

Zest Labs is part of a very competitive industry that markets solutions to fresh food supply chain users, such as fresh food growers, producers and retailers. Many other companies that are both more established and command much greater resources compete in this market. While Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery offer new technical approaches and new user value, it remains uncertain if Zest Labs will gain sufficient adoption of its products to make them viable in the market. Further, it is unclear what industry competitors are developing that might address similar user needs. Zest Labs’ products provide a new approach for industry participants, and as with any new approach, adoption is uncertain as many in the industry can be slow to embrace new technology and/or new approaches. These market challenges can lead to extended sales cycles that may include extended pilot testing often at Zest Labs’ expense, for which the outcome remains unclear until the completion of each test. For these reasons, and others, forecasting new business adoption and future revenue can be very difficult and volatile; however, the Company believes that Zest Fresh offers fresh food retailers, growers, shippers, processors and distributors an opportunity to differentiate their businesses in ways that the shipment of canned and boxed food products cannot, as competition in the agriculture, grocery, food service and restaurant markets continues to accelerate.

The acquisition of 440labs in May 2017 allowed Zest Labs to internally maintain its software development and information solutions for cloud, mobile, and IoT applications. 440labs had been a key development partner with Zest Labs for more than four years prior to the May 2017 acquisition, contributing its expertise in scalable enterprise cloud solutions and mobile applications.

Eco3D™Trend Capital Management

 

Eco3DBefore we acquired Trend Holdings in May 2019 by merging Trend Holdings with and into the Company, Trend Holdings was a financial services holding company with two primary subsidiaries: Trend Discovery Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Trend Capital Management”), and Barrier Crest, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Barrier Crest”).

Trend Capital Management was founded in 2011 and was Trend Holding’s primary asset. Trend Capital Management provides services and collects fees from entities including Trend LP and Trend SPV, both of which invest in securities.Trend Capital Management neither invests in securities nor have any role in Tend LP and Trend SPV’s purchase of securities.The investment capital in Trend LP and Trend SPV is focusedfrom individual limited partners, and not from the Company.

In the near-term, Trend LP’s performance will be driven by its investment in Volans-i, a fully autonomous vertical takeoff and landing drone delivery platform (“Volans”). Trend LP currently owns approximately 1% of Volans and has participation rights to future financings to maintain such ownership at 1% indefinitely. More information can be found at website. www.flyvoly.com, the contents of which are not incorporated into this report.

Barrier Crest provides fund administration and fund formation services to institutional investors. Barrier Crest provides fund administration services to Trend LP and Trend SPV.

Banner Midstream Corp.

Banner Midstream has four operating subsidiaries: Pinnacle Frac, Capstone, White River, and Shamrock. Pinnacle Frac provides transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations. Capstone procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors. These two operating subsidiaries of Banner Midstream are revenue producing entities. White River and Shamrock are engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, and drilling operations on transitioning businesses from 2D technology that has existed for hundredsover 10,000 cumulative acres of years,active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Discontinued Operations of Ecoark Holdings Inc (prior to a worldacquisition of digital 3D. Eco3D incorporates a variety of 3D technologies to achieve customer goals and objectives. Utilizing several techniques, Eco3D can capture existing conditions – topography, buildings, exterior/interior spaces, etc. – in highly accurate detail that allows for 2D and 3D measurement. These measurements form the basis for analysis, design, documentation, and quality control. Eco3D offers solutions in multiple industries throughout the United States.Banner Midstream):

 

Pioneer Products

 

Pioneer Products, began by creatingLLC, an Arkansas limited liability company (“Pioneer Products”) was located in Rogers, Arkansas and was involved in the selling of recycled plastic products and other products. Pioneer Products recovered plastic waste from retail supply chains and converted the reclaimed material into new consumer products using plastic reclaimed from post-consumerwhich completed a closed loop and retailer’sreduced waste streams. One of these products is Pioneer Products’ “close looped” 45-gallon trash can.sent to landfills. Pioneer Products generates revenue from the sale of products such as plastic trash cans to 3,700 retail stores, including the largest retailerswas purchased by Ecoark, Inc. in the continental U.S. Pioneer Products’ competitors include large consumer products companies such as Rubbermaid and Hefty. A new product, office chairs, was introduced in 2016.

Building on a platform of proven retail success,2012. Pioneer Products now leverages its solidified reputation and strategic network by acting as a broker for other products and companies that fit into its brand portfolio. Pioneer owns direct vendor relationships and vendor numbers with some of the largest retailers in the U.S. This vendor number facilitates introduction of a new product to a retailer. Pioneer Products recently announced a new strategic alliance with a large distributor of family brands that strengthens its platform. Additionally, Pioneer’s offerings enable Ecoark to play a key role in supporting and making good on some of the world’s largest retailer’s goals of retail-level sustainability: reduction of waste within its supply chain and operations.

On May 3, 2016,acquired Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC was acquired by(“Sable”) in a stock transaction on May 3, 2016. In May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board of Directors (“Board”) approved a plan to sell Pioneer and Sable. Pioneer Productsconcluded operations in February 2019, and the sale of Sable’s assets was completed in March 2019. Relevant assets and liabilities are classified as held for 2,000,000 shares of Ecoark Holdings common stock. Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products.Sable Polymer Solutions specializessale and operations are classified as discontinued in the sale, purchase and processing of quality post-consumer and post-industrial plastic materials. It provides services to a variety of suppliers and customers throughout the plastics processing industry, from small extruders, molders and scrap collectors to multinational corporations. It has a reputation of consistent quality and service in the market place today.consolidated financial statements.

 

Magnolia Solar, Inc.

 

Magnolia Solar, Inc. is located in Albany, New York and was principally engaged in the development and commercialization of its nanotechnology-based, high-efficiency, thin-film technology that can be deposited on a variety of substrates, including glass and flexible structures. Magnolia Solar believes that this technology has the potential to capturewas a larger partsubsidiary of the solar spectrum to produce high-efficiency solar cells, and incorporates a unique nanostructure-based antireflection coating technology to possibly further increase the solar cell's performance. If these goals are met, there is the potential of significantly reducing the cost per watt. Since its inception, Magnolia Solar has not generated material revenues or earningsCorporation that merged with Ecoark Inc. (“Ecoark”) on March 24, 2016 to create Ecoark Holdings and continued as a resultsubsidiary of its activities. Ecoark Holdings. In May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Magnolia Solar, and the sale was completed in May 2019. Relevant assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale and operations are classified as discontinued in the consolidated financial statements.

 

5

2

 

Risks Associated with Our Business

Before you invest in our common stock and warrants, you should carefully consider all the information in this prospectus, including matters set forth under the heading “Risk Factors.”  We believe that the following are someDiscontinued Operations of the major risks and uncertainties that may affect us: 

We have a short operating history, a relatively new business model, and have not produced significant revenues, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and increases the risk that we will not be successful;
We have a history of operating losses, which may continue and may harm our ability to obtain financing and continue our operations;
It is possible that we may require additional financing to continue to grow our business operations, which would dilute the ownership held by our stockholders. If we are unable to obtain additional financing our business operations may be harmed or discontinued, and if we do obtain additional financing our stockholders may suffer substantial dilution;
General economic conditions may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition;
If our existing products and services are not accepted by potential customers or we fail to introduce new products and services, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be harmed;
We rely heavily on sales to a small group of customers, and the loss of a significant number of contracts would impact our ability to reach profitability;
If we are unable to adequately compete with our competitors, some of whom may have greater resources with which to compete, it may impact our ability to effectively market and sell our products;
If we are unable to retain the services of key personnel, we may not be able to continue our operations; and,
Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services and brand.

The Offering

Common stock outstanding prior to this
offering (1)
36,021,210 shares, including shares registered hereunder to be sold by the selling securityholders.
Common Stock Offered by the Selling Securityholders8,673,250 including 4,336,625 shares underlying warrants.
Common stock to be outstanding assuming full exercise of the warrants (2)40,357,835 shares.
Use of proceedsWe will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares in this offering by the selling securityholders. We will, however, receive approximately $21,683 from the selling securityholders if they exercise all of the warrants on a cash basis. The Company did receive $17,347 from the initial offering to the selling securityholders which it is using for general working capital purposes. See “Use of Proceeds” beginning on page 12.
OTCQB Trading SymbolEARK
Terms of the WarrantsThe exercise price of each warrant is $5.00 per share, subject to adjustment for stock splits and corporate reorganizations.  Each warrant is exercisable on or before December 31, 2018.  Ecoark Holdings may require a warrant holder to exercise all, but not less than all of the unexercised portion of the warrant, upon written notice that (i) the last reported sale price of common stock on each of 60 consecutive trading days exceeded $7.50 and (ii) the average daily trading volume (as reported on Bloomberg) of the common stock over the 60 consecutive trading period was not less than 100,000 shares on the trading market on which the common stock is listed or designated for quotation.  In the event that the holder does not exercise the warrant, the holder shall forfeit any rights under the warrant, including the right to exercise the warrant to the extent not previously exercised and the warrant shall be treated as canceled for all purposes.
Risk factorsYou should read the section of this prospectus entitled “Risk Factors” for a discussion of factors to carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock and warrants.

In this offering, we offered units for $4.00 per unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock for $5.00. Through March 31, 2016, we received proceeds from subscriptions equal to $9,555 for 2,388,750 units. From April 1, 2016 through April 28, 2016, we received proceeds of $7,792 for 1,947,875 units. In total, we received proceeds of $17,347 for 4,336,625 units, consisting of 4,336,625 shares and 4,336,625 units.

(1)        The number of shares of our common stock outstanding prior to this offering is based on 29,672,062 shares of common stock outstanding after the Merger, 2,000,000 shares issued to the holders of Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC and 4,336,625 shares issued to the selling securityholders. 

(2)        The total number of shares of our common stock underlying the warrants is 4,336,625. 

3

RISK FACTORSBanner Midstream

 

Pinnacle Vac, LLC

Banner Midstream made the decision to discontinue the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Pinnacle Vac Service LLC (“Pinnacle Vac”) effective October 31, 2018 due to the inability of Pinnacle Vac’s management to develop a sustainable, profitable business model. All of the non-managerial staff of Pinnacle Vac were terminated on October 23, 2018 and all of its oilfield services operations were terminated on October 23, 2018.

The managerial staff of Pinnacle Vac was terminated on November 15, 2018 and Pinnacle Vac’s rental facility at Sligo Rd was vacated on November 15, 2018.

Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) ASC 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements – Discontinued Operations, ASC-20-45-1B, paragraph 360-10-45-15, Pinnacle Vac will be disposed of other than by sale via an abandonment and termination of operations with no intent to classify the entity or assets as Available for Sale. Pursuant to ASC 205-20-45-3A, the results of operations of Pinnacle Vac from inception to discontinuation of operations will be reclassified to a separate component of income, below Net Income/(Loss), as a Loss on Discontinued Operations.

All of the equipment assets of Pinnacle Vac and the related loan liabilities will be subsequently transitioned into Capstone to continue servicing the debt. The remaining current assets of Pinnacle Vac will be used to settle any outstanding current liabilities of Pinnacle Vac. A loss contingency will be recorded if any of the outstanding liabilities or obligations of Pinnacle Vac resulting from this abandonment are reasonably estimable and likely to be incurred.

Competition

Zest Labs operates in markets for products and services that are highly competitive and face aggressive competition in all areas of their business. The market for cloud-based, real-time supply chain analytic solutions—the market in which Zest Labs competes—is rapidly evolving. There are several new competitors with competing technologies, including companies that have greater resources than Ecoark Holdings, which operate in this space. Some of these companies are subsidiaries of large publicly traded companies that have brand recognition, established relationships with retailers, and own the manufacturing process.

Trend Holdings and its subsidiaries have significant competition from larger companies with greater assets and resources.

Banner Midstream expects to encounter intense competition from entities having a business objective similar to theirs. Some of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources than they do and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe that there are numerous riskspotential target businesses that we could acquire, our ability to compete in acquiring certain sizable target businesses will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses.

Sales and Marketing

Zest Labs sells its products and services principally through direct sales efforts and the utilization of third-party agents. Zest Labs has marketing operations and programs for demand generation, public relations, and branding/messaging that are scaled based on market engagement and available resources.

Trend Holdings and its subsidiaries provide fund administration and fund formation services to institutional investors and market their services through private marketing.

Banner Midstream sells and provides services to its customers via a blanket master services agreement (MSA). Banner Midstream sells hydrocarbon to midstream providers such as Plains Marketing L.P.

Government Regulations

Zest Labs

Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates. The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”), is responsible for the assignment of spectrum for non-government use in the United States in accordance with regulations established by an international organization known as the International Telecommunications Union (the “ITU”). Any ITU or FCC reallocation of radio frequency spectrum, including frequency band segmentation or sharing of spectrum, could cause interference with the reception of GPS signals and may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of Zest Labs’ products, which would, in turn, cause a material adverse effect on our operating results.

6

Banner Midstream

Oil and gas production are regulated under a wide range of federal and state statutes, rules, orders and regulations. State and federal statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. The states in which we operate, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico (the “Territory”), have regulations governing conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells, the regulation of spacing, and requirements for plugging and abandonment of wells. Also, states in the Territory impose a severance tax on production and sales of oil, and gas within its jurisdiction. Failure to comply with these rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. Our competitors in the oil and gas industry are subject to the same regulatory requirements and restrictions that affect our operations.

Environmental Compliance Expenses

We are currently not experiencing any material expenses related to the environmental compliance. Please review Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report with regard to potential environmental compliance expenses.

Research and Development

We have devoted a substantial amount of our resources to software and hardware development activities in recent years, principally for the Zest Labs initiatives. Ecoark Holdings believes that, analyzing the competitive factors affecting the market for the solutions and services its subsidiaries provide, its products and services compete favorably by offering integrated solutions to customers. The Company has incurred research and development expenses of $2,472 and $3,320 in the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, to develop its solutions and differentiate those solutions from competitive offerings. We incurred no capitalized software development costs in the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.

Intellectual Property

The Company, through Zest Labs, currently holds rights to 69 U.S. patents (with additional patents pending), numerous related foreign patents, and U.S. copyrights relating to certain aspects of its Zest software, hardware devices including Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”) technology, software, and services. In addition, Zest Labs has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services,” and the Zest, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery logos, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Many of Zest Labs’ products have been designed to include licensed intellectual property obtained from third-parties. Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates.

Equipment

Banner Midstream is pursuing additional purchases of machinery and equipment to become a fully vertically integrated exploration and production company.

No Foreign Operations

No foreign operations are expected in connection with the Company’s business.

Seasonality

Our business experiences a certain level of seasonality due to Banner Midstream’s oil and gas exploration and transportation business. Demand for oil, natural gas and energy is typically higher in the third and fourth quarters resulting in higher prices. Due to these seasonal fluctuations, results of operations for individual quarterly periods may not be indicative of the results that may be realized on an annual basis. Seasonal weather conditions and lease stipulations can limit drilling and producing activities and other oil and natural gas operations in a portion of our business, someoperating areas of trucking business. These seasonal anomalies can pose challenges for the drilling objectives and can increase competition for equipment, supplies and personnel during the spring and summer months, which could lead to shortages and increase costs or delay operations, thus, lowering the demand for trucking services.

Dependence on One or Few Major Customers

From time to time we may have customers generating 10 percent or more of the Company’s consolidated revenues, and loss of such customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Employees

At March 31, 2020, we had 36 full time employees, and 98 owner-operator truck drivers leased on to Pinnacle Frac. None of our employees are beyondrepresented by a labor union or a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our control. An investmentemployee relations to be positive.

7

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of riskrisk. You should carefully consider the following information about these risks, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, including our financial statements, the notes thereto and may not be appropriate for investors who cannot affordthe section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” before deciding to lose their entire investment. Ifinvest in our common stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks actually occur,could have a material and adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, or operating results could be materially harmed. This could causeof operations and future growth prospects, as well as our ability to accomplish our strategic objectives. As a result, the trading price of our common stock tocould decline and you maycould lose all or part of your investment. In addition to the risks outlined below,Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently considerdeem immaterial may also impair our business operations. Potential risksoperations and uncertainties that could affect our operating results and financial condition include, without limitation, the following:stock price.

 

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR OPERATIONSCOMPANY

We have experienced losses since our founding. A failure to obtain profitability and achieve consistent positive cash flows would have a significant adverse effect on our business.

 

We have incurred operating losses since our inception, including a reported net loss of $10,473 and $14,264$12,137 for the yearsyear ended DecemberMarch 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Cash2020 as compared to $13,650 for the year ended March 31, 2019. Net cash used in operating activities was $5,490 for the yearsyear ended DecemberMarch 31, 2015 and 2014 were $7,671 and $8,012, respectively. We expect2020, as compared to continue to incurnet cash used in operating losses through at least fiscal 2016.activities of $9,040 for the year ended March 31, 2019. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2015,2020, we had cash and cash equivalents(including restricted cash) of $1,962,$406, a working capital deficit of $2,153,$16,689, and an accumulated deficit of $36,587,$128,023. Some of our debt and a stockholders’equity instruments may contain derivative liabilities which may result in variability in our working capital deficit as these liabilities are re-measured each reporting period. Prior to the acquisition of $913. To date,Banner Midstream, we have funded our operations principally through the sale of our capital stock and debt instruments. We will need

In their audit report for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, our independent auditors reported that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to generate significant revenuescontinue as a going concern to achieve profitability,carry out our business plan. Although, we alleviated the substantial doubt for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 as a result of the Company raising over $6 million in the exercise of warrants and we cannot assure you that we will ever realize revenues at such levels. If we do achieve profitability in any period, we may not be ablethe entering into a $35 million secured funding for our new business venture with Banner Midstream, the global pandemic caused by COVID-19 has brought uncertainty to sustain or increase our profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.the global workforce as well as the capital markets.

 

We may require additional financing to support our operations. Such financing may only be available on disadvantageous terms, or may not be available at all. Any new equity financing could have a substantial dilutive effect on our existing stockholders.The COVID-19 worldwide pandemic has disrupted the global economy and supply chains.

 

At December 31, 2015, we had cashThe short-term and cash equivalentslong-term effects of $1,962, a working capital deficit of $2,153the COVID-19 pandemic, including actions taken by businesses and an accumulated deficit of $36,587. While we closed a $17,347 Private Offering on April 28, 2016, our cash position may declinegovernments, have adversely affected the global economy, disrupted global supply chains and created significant volatility in the financial markets. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operation and liquidity will depend on future developments, which are uncertain and we may notcannot be successfulpredicted. Disruptions and/or uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic for a sustained period of time could result in maintaining an adequate level of cash resources. We may be requireddelays or modifications to seek additional debt or equity financing in order to support our growing operations. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms, or at all,the Company’s strategic plans and any new equity financing could have a substantial dilutive effect on our existing stockholders. If we cannot obtain additional financing, we will not be ableinitiatives and hinder the Company’s ability to achieve the sales growth that we need to cover our costs, and our results of operations would be negatively affected.

its strategic goals.

 

We cannot predict our future results because we have a limited operating history.

 

Our direct wholly-owned subsidiaries, Ecoark and Magnolia Solar were formed on November 28, 2011 and January 8, 2008, respectively. Ecoark began realizing revenues from operations in 2012. Given our limited operating history, it may be difficult for you to evaluate our performance or prospects. You should consider the uncertainties that we may encounter as a company that should still be considered an early stage company. These uncertainties include:

 

our ability to market our services and products for a profit;

our ability to recruit and retain skilled personnel;

our ability to secure and retain key customers; and

our evolving business model.

 

If we are not able to address successfully some or all of these uncertainties, we may not be able to expand our business, compete effectively or achieve profitability.

We may require additional financing to support our operations. Any new equity financing could have a substantial dilutive effect on our existing stockholders.

As of March 31, 2020, we had cash (including restricted cash) of $406, a working capital deficit of $16,689, and an accumulated deficit of $128,023. While we expect cash can be provided by a $35,000 secured debt financing, the final agreement is still pending and not guaranteed to close. The Company has also raised substantial operating cash through the exercise of our warrants issued in capital raises over the past two years. We continue to seek additional financing in order to support current operations as well as potential vertical integration of existing assets or operations of similar companies. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms, or at all, and any new equity financing could have a substantial dilutive effect on our existing stockholders and or contain complex terms subject to derivative accounting. Our operating results from our commodities segment and financial segment should be in position to provide for positive cash flow to assist in the support of our technology segment and holding company related costs.

8

Banner Midstream has devoted substantially all of their financial resources to purchase new equipment and to acquire existing businesses in the states of Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico (the “Territory”). Banner Midstream had financed their operations primarily through the issuance of debt securities. The amount of their future net losses will depend, in part, on successful implementation of their business strategy, continuous increase in demand of tracking and freight services to maintain the oil-related enterprises, the rate of our future expenditures and our ability to obtain funding through the issuance of our securities, strategic collaborations with key customers. Trucking business development is a highly speculative undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk. Banner Midstream is in the early stages of acquiring existing businesses and establishing operations of our wholly owned subsidiaries on the Territory. It may be several years, if ever, before the Company becomes profitable.

Our future revenue will depend upon the size of the markets which we target and our ability to achieve continuous and sufficient market acceptance.

Even if we enter all necessary agreements with key customers in the oil industry and purchase enough equipment to satisfy the demand for freight services in the market, our future revenue will depend upon the size of the markets which we target and our ability to achieve continuous and sufficient market acceptance, and such factors as pricing, reimbursement from third-party payors and adequate market share for our services at the target markets.

We anticipate that the Banner Midstream expenses will increase substantially if and as they:

continue the research of the market and potential private companies to acquire;
expand the scope of our operations on the Territory;
establish a supply-demand chain and a respective trucking infrastructure to commercialize our market opportunities;
acquire existing businesses and revitalize their operations with the Companies framework;
seek to maintain, protect, and expand the Territory;
seek to attract and retain skilled personnel; and
create additional infrastructure to support our operations as a public company and plan future commercialization efforts.

Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to control the operational costs.

We cannot guarantee that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Moreover, the terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of holders of our securities and the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our shares to decline. The incurrence of indebtedness could result in increased fixed payment obligations, and we may be required to agree to certain restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, limitations on our ability to acquire or sell other entities and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. We could also be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or otherwise at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable, and we may be required to relinquish rights to some of our current master service agreements or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects. Even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations.

If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue one or more of the lines of operations of our wholly owned subsidiaries or be unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We will not be able to develop or continue our business if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain a number of highly skilled employees and on the service and performance of our senior management team and other key personnel. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees could adversely affect our business. Competition for qualified personnel possessing the skills necessary to implement our strategy is intense, and we may fail to attract or retain the employees necessary to execute our business model successfully. We have obtained “key person” life insurance policies covering certain employees.

Our success will depend to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our key management, engineering and other personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. In particular, we believe that our future success is highly dependent on Randy May, our Chief Executive Officer, and Peter Mehring, President of Zest Labs. If Messrs. May or Mehring, or any other key members of our management team, leave our employment, our business could suffer, and the share price of our common stock could decline.

9

Our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks.

We intend to pursue continued growth through opportunities to acquire companies or assets that will enable us to expand our product and service offerings and to increase our geographic footprint. We routinely review potential acquisitions. However, we may be unable to implement this growth strategy if we cannot reach agreement on potential strategic acquisitions on acceptable terms or for other reasons. Moreover, our acquisition strategy involves certain risks, including:

difficulties in the post-acquisition integration of operations and systems;
the termination of relationships with key personnel and customers of the acquired company;
a failure to add additional employees to manage the increased volume of business;
additional post acquisition challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning, treasury management, financial reporting and legal compliance;
risks and liabilities from our acquisitions, some of which may not be discovered during the pre-acquisition due diligence process;
a disruption of our ongoing business or an inability of our ongoing business to receive sufficient management attention; and
a failure to realize the cost savings or other financial benefits we anticipated prior to acquisition.

Future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on current attractive market terms.

Risks Factors Relating to Zest Labs

 

If we are unable to develop and generate additional demand for our services or products, we will likely suffer serious harm to our business.

 

We have invested significant resources in developing and marketing our services and products. Some of our services and products are often considered complex and often involve a new approach to the conduct of business by our customers. As a result, intensive marketing and sales efforts may be necessary to educate prospective customers regarding the uses and benefits of our services and products in order to generate additional demand. The market for our services and products may weaken, competitors may develop superior offerings, or we may fail to develop acceptable solutions to address new market conditions. Any one of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

 

4

Undetected errors or failures in our software, products or services could result in loss or delay in the market acceptance for our products or lost sales.

 

Because our software services and products, and the environments in which they operate, are complex, our software and products may contain errors that can be detected at any point in its lifecycle. While we continually test our services and products for errors, errors may be found at any time in the future. Detection of any significant errors may result in, among other things, loss of, or delay in, market acceptance and sales of our services and products, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation, increased service and warranty costs, license terminations or renegotiations or costly litigation. Additionally, because our services and products support or rely on other systems and applications, any software or hardware errors or bugsdefects in these systems or applications may result in errors in the performance of our service or products, and it may be difficult or impossible to determine where the error resides.

 

We may not be competitive, and increased competition could seriously harm our business.

 

Relative to us, some of our current competitors or potential competitors of our products and services may have one or more of the following advantages:

 

longer operating histories;

greater financial, technical, marketing, sales and other resources;

positive cash flows from operations;

greater name recognition;

a broader range of products to offer;

an established intellectual property portfolio;

a larger installed base of customers; and,
superior customer service;

 

10

higher levels of quality and reliability;
dependable and efficient distribution networks; and
competitive product and services pricing.

 

Although no single competitive factor is dominant, current and potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to enhance their offerings that are competitive with our products and services, which may result in increased competition. We cannot assure that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors. Increased competition in mobile data capture products, software, and related products and solutions, or supplies may result in price reductions, low gross profit margins, and loss of market share, and could require increased spending on research and development, sales and marketing, and customer support. Some competitors may make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships with suppliers or companies that produce complementary products, which may create additional pressures on our competitive position in the marketplace.

 

Sales to many of our target customers involve long sales and implementation cycles, which may cause revenues and operating results to vary significantly.

 

A prospective customer’s decision to purchase our services or products may often involve lengthy evaluation and product qualification processes. Throughout the sales cycle, we anticipate often spending considerable time educating and providing information to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of our services and products. Budget constraints and the need for multiple approvals within these organizations may also delay the purchase decision. Failure to obtain the timely required approval for a particular project or purchase decision may delay the purchase of our services or products. As a result, we expect that the sales cycle for some of our services and products will typically range from 90 days to more than 360 days, depending on the availability of funding to the prospective customer. These long cycles may cause delays in any potential sale, and we may spend a large amount of time and resources on prospective customers who decide not to purchase our services or products, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

 

Additionally, some of our services and products are designed for corporate customers, which requires us to maintain a sales force that understands the needs of these customers, engages in extensive negotiations and provides high-level support to complete sales. If we do not successfully market our services and products to these targeted customers, our operating results will be below our expectations and the expectations of investors and market analysts, which would likely cause the price of our common stock to decline.

 

We will not be ablePatents, trademarks, copyrights and licenses are important to developthe Company’s business, and the inability to defend, obtain or continue our business if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.renew such intellectual property could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

 

Our future success depends on our abilityThrough Zest Labs, the Company currently holds rights to attract, hire, trainpatents and retaincopyrights relating to certain aspects of its RFID technology, software, and services. In addition, the Company has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of highly skilled employeesforeign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services”, the Zest logo, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Although the Company believes the ownership of such patents, copyrights, trademarks and service marks is an important factor in its business and that its success does depend in part on the serviceownership thereof, the Company relies primarily on the innovative skills, technical competence, and performancemarketing abilities of our senior management team and other keyits personnel. The lossLoss of a significant number of licenses may have an adverse effect of the services of our executive officers or other key employees could adversely affect our business. Competition for qualified personnel possessing the skills necessary to implement our strategy is intense, and we may fail to attract or retain the employees necessary to execute our business model successfully. We have obtained “key person” life insurance policies covering three of our employees.Company’s operations.

 

5

Our success will dependZest Labs’ products are designed to a significant degreeinclude intellectual property obtained from third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods, the Company believes, based upon the continued contributions of our key management, engineeringpast experience and other personnel, many of whom wouldindustry practice, such licenses generally could be difficult to replace. In particular, we believeobtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that our future success is highly dependent on Randy May, our Chief Executive Officer, Peter Mehring, President of Intelleflex and Ken Smerz, President of Eco3D. If Messrs. May, Mehring or Smerz, or any other key members of our management team, leave our employment, our businesssuch licenses could suffer and the share price of our common stock would likely decline. Although we have entered into an employment agreement with each of Messrs. May, Mehring and Smerz, one or more of them may voluntarily terminate his servicesbe obtained at any time.all.

 

The Company relies on licenses to third-party patents and intellectual property, and the Company’s future results could be materially adversely affected if it is alleged or found to have infringed intellectual property rights.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to use third-party intellectual property, and it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods. Although the Company believes that, based on past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, there is no assurance that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable terms or at all.

If we do not protect our proprietary information and prevent third parties from making unauthorized use of our products and technology, our financial results could be harmed.

 

MostMuch of our software and underlying technology is proprietary. We seek to protect our proprietary rights through a combination of confidentiality agreements and through copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws. However, all of these measures afford only limited protection and may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented by third parties. Any patent licensed by us or issued to us could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or rights granted there underthereunder may not provide a competitive advantage to us. Furthermore, patent applications that we file may not result in issuance of a patent or, if a patent is issued, the patent may not be issued in a form that is advantageous to us. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights, others may independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around our patents and other rights. In addition, it is difficult to monitor compliance with, and enforce, our intellectual property in a cost-effective manner.

11

 

Third parties claiming that we infringe their proprietary rights could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and prevent us from selling our products and services.

 

From time to time, we might receive claims that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of others, including claims regarding patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Because of constant technological change in the markets in which we compete, the extensive patent coverage of existing technologies, and the rapid rate of issuance of new patents, it is possible that the number of these claims may grow.In addition, former employers of our former, current, or future employees may assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosed to us the confidential or proprietary information of these former employers. Any such claim, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation and distract management from day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in defending such claims, we could be required to stop selling, delay shipments of, or redesign our products, pay monetary amounts as damages, enter into royalty or licensing arrangements, or satisfy indemnification obligations that we have with some of our customers. We cannot assure you that any royalty or licensing arrangements that we may seek in such circumstances will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We may incur significant expenditures to investigate, defend and settle claims related to the use of technology and intellectual property rights as part of our strategy to manage this risk.

 

Periods of sustained economic adversity and uncertainty could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Demand for our services and products depend in large part upon the level of capital and maintenance expenditures by many of our customers. Lower budgets could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our services and products, and our business, results of operations, cash flow and overall financial condition would suffer.

 

Disruptions in the financial markets may have an adverse impact on regional and world economies and credit markets, which could negatively impact the availability and cost of capital for us and our customers. These conditions may reduce the willingness or ability of our customers and prospective customers to commit funds to purchase our services or products, or their ability to pay for our services after purchase. These conditions could result in bankruptcy or insolvency for some customers, which would impact our revenue and cash collections. These conditions could also result in pricing pressure and less favorable financial terms in our contracts and our ability to access capital to fund our operations.

 

Patents, trademarks, copyrights and licenses are importantFinal assembly of certain products is performed by third-party manufacturers. We may be dependent on these third-party manufacturers as a sole-source of supply for the manufacture of such products.

A failure by such manufacturers to provide manufacturing services to us, or any disruption in such manufacturing services, may adversely affect our business results. We may incur increased business disruption risk due to the Company’sdependence on these third-party manufacturers, as we are not able to exercise direct control over the assembly or related operations of certain of our products. If these third-party manufacturers experience business and the inabilitydifficulties or fail to defend, obtain or renew such intellectual property could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

The Company currently holds rights to patents and copyrights relating to certain aspects of its solar panel technology, Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”) technology, software, and services. In addition, the Company has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for "Intelleflex," the Intelleflex logo, "ZEST," "ZEST Data Services," "ZEST Fresh," and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Although the Company believes the ownership of such patents, copyrights, trademarks and service marks is an important factor in its business and that its success does depend in part on the ownership thereof, the Company relies primarily on the innovative skills, technical competence, and marketing abilities of its personnel.

6

Many of the Company's products are designed to include intellectual property obtained from third-parties. While itmeet our manufacturing needs, then we may be necessaryunable to satisfy customer product demands, lose sales, and be unable to maintain customer relationships. Longer production lead times may result in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspectsshortages of itscertain products and business methods,inadequate inventories during periods of unanticipated higher demand. Without such third parties continuing to manufacture our products, we may have no other means of final assembly of certain of our products until we are able to secure the Company believes, based upon past experience and industry practice, such licenses generallymanufacturing capability at another facility or develop an alternative manufacturing facility. This transition could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that such licenses could be obtained at all.costly and time consuming.

Failure of information technology systems and breaches in data security could adversely affect the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and operating results.

Information technology system failures and breaches of data security could disrupt the Company'sCompany’s operations by causing delays or cancellation of customer orders, impeding the manufacture or shipment of products, or resulting in the unintentional disclosure of customer or Company information. Management has taken steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security and internal control measures. There can be no assurance, however, that a system failure or data security breach will not have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and operating results.

Failure in our operational systems or cyber security attacks on any of our facilities, or those of third parties, may adversely affect our financial results.

Our business is dependent upon our operational systems to process a large amount of data and complex transactions. If any of our financial, operational, or other data processing systems fail or have other significant shortcomings, our financial results could be adversely affected. Our financial results could also be adversely affected if an employee causes our operational systems to fail, either as a result of inadvertent error or by deliberately tampering with or manipulating our operational systems. Due to increased technology advances, we have become more reliant on technology to help increase efficiency in our business. We use computer programs to help run our financial and operations sectors, and this may subject our business to increased risks. Any future cyber security attacks that affect our facilities, our customers and any financial data could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, cyber-attacks on our customer and employee data may result in a financial loss, including potential fines for failure to safeguard data, and may negatively impact our reputation. Third-party systems on which we rely could also suffer operational system failure. Any of these occurrences could disrupt our business, result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise have an adverse effect on our financial results.

12

 

The Company is subject to risks associated with laws, regulations and industry-imposed standards related to wireless communications devices.

 

Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the many jurisdictions in which the CompanyZest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Such changes, which could include but are not limited to restrictions on production, manufacture, distribution, and use of the device, may have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and operating results.

 

Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and operating results.

The Company relies on access to third-party patents and intellectual property, and the Company's future results could be materially adversely affected if it is alleged or found to have infringed intellectual property rights.

Many of the Company's products are designed to include third-party intellectual property, and it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods. Although the Company believes that, based on past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, there is no assurance that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable terms or at all.

 

Because of technological changes in the business software, web and device applications, sensors and sensor-based devices, and RFID and wireless communication industries, current extensive patent coverage, and the rapid issuance of new patents, it is possible that certain components of the Company'sZest Labs’ products and business methods may unknowingly infringe the patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. From time to time, the Company has beenZest Labs may be notified that it may be infringing such rights. Responding to such claims, regardless of their merit, can consume significant time and expense. In certain cases, the Company may consider the desirability of entering into licensing agreements, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. If there is a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting the Company from marketing or selling certain products or a successful claim of infringement against the Company requires it to pay royalties to a third party, the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

 

The inability to obtain certain raw materialscomponents could adversely impact the Company’s ability to deliver on its contractual commitments which could negatively impact operations and cash flows.

Although most components essential to the Company'sCompany’s business are generally available from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID custom integrated circuits, and application-specific integrated circuits ("ASICs") are currently obtained by the Company from single or limited sources. Magnolia Solar is also developing nanostructured optical coating technology to improve the solar cell performance. The raw materials for this effort are glass, quartz, silicon wafers and nitrogen gas. Some key components, while currently available to the Company from multiple sources, are at times subject to industry-wide availability constraints and pricing pressures. If the supply of a key or single-sourced component to the Company were to be delayed or curtailed or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delayed shipment of completed products to the Company, the Company'sCompany’s ability to ship related products in desired quantities, and in a timely manner, could be adversely affected. The Company'sCompany’s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source, or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source. Continued availability of these components may be affected if suppliers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the Company'sCompany’s requirements. The Company attempts to mitigate these potential risks by working closely with these and other key suppliers on product introduction plans, strategic inventories, coordinated product introductions, and internal and external manufacturing schedules and levels. Consistent with industry practice, the Company acquires components through a combination of formal purchase orders, supplier contracts, and open orders based on projected demand information. However, adverse changes in the supply chain of the Company’s vendors may adversely impact the supply of key components.

 

7

Risk Factors Relating to Banner Midstream

 

Our solar products have never been sold on a commercial basis,near-term success is dependent upon our ability to grow our oilfield services and we do not know whether they will be accepted by the market.transportation operations.

 

According to the BP Statistical Review of World Energy publishedOur success will depend, in 2015, the installed solar PV capacity was about 180 Gigawatt hours at the end of 2014. Total global production of electricity was about 23,536 terawatt hours in 2014. Thus, at the end of 2014 less than 1 percent electric power came from solar photovoltaic sources. Even with many advances in the solar photovoltaic technology, adoption of solar photovoltaic power technology by energy users remains low and the total solar electricity production capacity remains well below one percent of the world consumption of electricity. Thus, the solar energy market is at a relatively early stage of development and the extent to which solar modules will be widely adopted is uncertain. If our products are not accepted by the market, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition will suffer. Moreover, demand for solar modules in our targeted markets may not develop or may develop to a lesser extent than we anticipate. The development of a successful market for our proposed products andpart, upon our ability to sell them at a lower price per watt may be affected by a numbercommence operation of our oilfield and transportation services operations. Attracting new customers and joining networks and demand-supply chains requires substantial time and expense. Any failure to commence operations timely would adversely affect our operating results. Many factors manycould affect the market acceptance and commercial success of which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to:services, including:

 

 failureour ability to produce solar power products that compete favorably against other solar power products onconvince our potential customers of the basisadvantages, logistic and economic benefits of cost, quality and performance;our services over competitors;
   
 competition from conventional energy sources and alternative distributed generation technologies, such as wind energy;the niche scope of our product menu relative to competitors;
   
 failurechanges to developpolicies, procedures or currently accepted best practices in transportation business, cargo, and maintain successful relationships with suppliers, distributorstransportation sectors;
changes to policies, procedures or currently accepted best practices in the transportation and strategic partners;logistics-industry
the extent and success of our marketing and sales efforts; and
   
 customer acceptanceour ability to commence operations of our products. all acquired private companies in a timely fashion.

 

The transportation industry is affected by economic and business risks that are largely beyond our control.

The transportation industry is highly cyclical, and our business is dependent on a number of factors that may have a negative impact on our operating results, many of which are beyond our control. Our revenue is from customers in the oil exploration and production industry. As such, our volumes are largely dependent on the economy and our results may be more susceptible to trends in unemployment and how it affects oil prices than carriers that do not have this focus. We believe that some of the most significant factors beyond our control that may negatively impact our operating results are economic changes that affect supply and demand in transportation markets.

13

The risks associated with these factors are heightened when the United States economy is weakened. Some of the principal risks during such times are as follows:

low overall demand levels, which may impair our asset utilization;

customers with credit issues and cash flow problems we are not currently aware of;

customers bidding out our services or selecting competitors that offer lower rates, in an attempt to lower their costs, forcing us to lower our rates or lose revenue; and

more unbilled miles incurred to obtain loads.

Economic conditions that decrease shipping demand or increase the supply of capacity in the trucking transportation industry on the Territory can exert downward pressure on rates and equipment utilization, thereby decreasing asset productivity. Declining freight levels and rates, a prolonged recession or general economic instability could result in declines in our results of operations, which declines may be material.

We also are subject to cost increases outside our control that could materially reduce our profitability if we are unable to increase our rates sufficiently. Such cost increases include, but are not limited to, fuel and energy prices, driver wages, taxes and interest rates, tolls, license and registration fees, insurance premiums, regulations, revenue equipment and related maintenance costs and healthcare and other benefits for our associates. We cannot predict whether, or in what form, any such cost increase or event could occur. Any such cost increase or event could adversely affect our profitability.

In addition, events outside our control, such as strikes or other work stoppages at our facilities or at customer, port, border or other shipping locations, weather, actual or threatened armed conflicts or terrorist attacks, efforts to combat terrorism, military action against a foreign state or group located in a foreign state or heightened security requirements could lead to reduced economic demand, reduced availability of credit or temporary closing of shipping locations or United States borders. Such events or enhanced security measures in connection with such events could impair our operations and result in higher operating costs.

The transportation industry is highly competitive and fragmented, which subjects us to competitive pressures pertaining to pricing, capacity and service.

Our operating segments compete with many trucking carriers. The trucking industry in our Territory is highly competitive and fragmented. Some of our customers may utilize their own private fleets rather than outsourcing loads to us. Some of our competitors may have greater access to equipment, a larger fleet, a wider range of services, preferential dedicated customer contracts, greater capital resources or other competitive advantages. Numerous competitive factors could impair our ability to maintain or improve our profitability. These factors include the following:

Many of our competitors periodically reduce their freight rates to gain business, especially during times of reduced growth in the economy. This may make it difficult for us to maintain or increase freight rates, or may require us to reduce our freight rates. Additionally, it may limit our ability to maintain or expand our business.
We face competition in this market from competitors that have operated in this market for several years, which may hinder our ability to compete and gain market share.
Since some of our customers also operate their own private trucking fleets, they may decide to transport more of their own freight.
Some shippers have selected core carriers for their shipping needs, for which we may not be selected.
Many customers periodically solicit bids from multiple carriers for their shipping needs, despite the existence of dedicated contracts (Master Service Agreements), which may depress freight rates or result in a loss of business to our competitors.
The continuing trend toward consolidation in the trucking industry may result in more large carriers with greater financial resources and other competitive advantages, with which we may have difficulty competing.
Higher fuel prices and higher fuel surcharges to our customers may cause some of our customers to consider freight transportation alternatives, including rail transportation, if available.
Advancements in technology may necessitate that we increase investments in order to remain competitive, and our customers may not be willing to accept higher freight rates to cover the cost of these investments.
Competition from freight logistics and brokerage companies may negatively impact our customer relationships and freight rates.
Smaller carriers may build economies of scale with procurement aggregation providers, which may improve such carriers’ abilities to compete with us.

14

We may be affected by labor issues in the broader transportation industry.

Difficulty in attracting drivers could affect our profitability and ability to grow. Periodically, the trucking industry experiences difficulty in attracting and retaining qualified drivers, including independent contractors, resulting in intense competition for drivers. We have from time to time experienced underutilization and increased expenses due to a shortage of qualified drivers. If we are unable to attract drivers when needed or contract with independent contractors when needed, we could be required to further adjust our proposed productsdriver compensation packages or let trucks sit idle, which could adversely affect our growth and profitability. If we are unable to retain drivers, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

We have several major customers, the loss of one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

A significant portion of our operating revenue is generated from a number of major customers, the loss of one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Economic and capital markets conditions may adversely affect our customers and their ability to remain solvent. Our customers’ financial difficulties can negatively impact our business and operating results and financial condition. Generally, we do not have contractual relationships with our customers that guarantee any minimum volumes, and our customer relationships may not continue as presently in effect. We generally do not have long-term contractual relationships with our customers, including our dedicated customers, and certain of these contracts contain clauses that permit cancellation on a short-term basis without cause, and accordingly any of our customers may not continue to utilize our services, renew our existing contracts or continue at the same volume levels. Despite the existence of contract arrangements with our customers, certain of our customers may nonetheless engage in competitive bidding processes that could negatively impact our contractual relationship. In addition, certain of our major customers may increasingly use their own trucking and delivery fleets, which would reduce our freight volumes. A reduction in or termination of our services by one or more of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Fluctuations in the price or availability of fuel, the volume and terms of diesel fuel purchase commitments and surcharge collection may increase our costs of operation, which could materially and adversely affect our margins.

Fuel represents a significant expense for us. Diesel fuel prices fluctuate greatly due to factors beyond our control, such as political events, terrorist activities, armed conflicts, depreciation of the dollar against other currencies and weather, such as hurricanes, and other natural or man-made disasters, each of which may lead to an increase in the cost of fuel. Fuel prices also are affected by the rising demand in developing countries, and could be adversely impacted by diminished drilling activity and by the use of crude oil and oil reserves for other purposes. Such events may lead not only to increases in fuel prices, but also to fuel shortages and disruptions in the fuel supply chain. Because our operations are dependent upon diesel fuel, and a portion of our business is based on fuel purchased on the spot market at prevailing market rates, significant diesel fuel cost increases, shortages or supply disruptions could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Increases in fuel costs, to the extent not offset by rate per mile increases or fuel surcharges, have an adverse effect on our operations and profitability. While a portion of our fuel costs are covered by pass-through provisions in customer contracts and compensatory fuel surcharge programs, we also incur fuel costs that cannot be recovered even with respect to customers with which we maintain fuel surcharge programs, such as those associated with unbilled miles, or the time when our engines are idling. Because our fuel surcharge recovery lags behind changes in fuel prices, our fuel surcharge recovery may not capture the increased costs we pay for fuel, especially when prices are rising, leading to fluctuations in our levels of reimbursement. Further, during periods of low freight volumes, shippers can use their negotiating leverage to impose less compensatory fuel surcharge policies. In addition, the terms of each customer’s fuel surcharge agreement vary, and customers may seek to modify the terms of their fuel surcharge agreements to minimize recoverability for fuel price increases. Such fuel surcharges may not be maintained indefinitely or may not be sufficiently effective. As of the date of this prospectus, we had no derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to fuel price fluctuations, nor are we aware of existence thereof.

Difficulties attracting and retaining qualified drivers, including through owner-operators, could materially adversely affect our profitability and ability to maintain or grow our fleet.

Like many carriers, from time to time we may experience difficulty in attracting and retaining sufficient numbers of qualified drivers, including through owner-operators, and driver shortages may recur in the future. Our challenge with attracting and retaining qualified drivers stems from intense market competition and our driver quality standards, which subjects us to increased payments for driver compensation and owner-operator contracted rates. Our specialty equipment services targeting servicing oil exploration and oil development industries require special training to handle unique operating requirements. We may be legally obligated or otherwise subjected by the industry standards to use physical function tests and hair follicle and urine testing to screen and test all driver applicants, which we believe is a rigorous standard and could decrease the pool of qualified applicants available to us. Failure to recruit high-quality, safe drivers that meet our testing standards could diminish the safety of our fleet and could have a materially adverse effect on our customer relationships and our business.

Our Company drivers are generally compensated on a per-mile basis, and the rate per-mile generally increases with the drivers’ length of service. Owner-operators contracting with us are generally compensated on a percentage of revenue basis. The compensation we offer our drivers and owner-operators is also subject to market conditions and labor supply. We may in future periods increase company driver and owner-operator compensation, which will be more likely to the extent that economic conditions improve and industry regulation exacerbates driver shortages forcing driver compensation higher. The recent electronic logging device regulations, requiring compliance by nearly all carriers has further tightened the market for eligible drivers. In addition, with any driver voluntary turnover rate, we may suffer a loss of company drivers. Such turnover rate could require us to continually recruit a substantial number of drivers in order to operate our revenue-producing fleet equipment, including trucks, chassis and specialty equipment. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain a sufficient number of high-quality company drivers, and contract with suitable owner-operators, we could be required to adjust our compensation packages, or operate with fewer trucks and face difficulty meeting shipper demands, all of which could adversely affect our profitability and ability to maintain our size or grow.

15

Our use of owner-operators to provide a portion of our truck fleet exposes us to different risks than we face with our owned trucks.

We may contract with owner-operators and use more owner-operator trucks than some of our competitors. We are therefore more dependent on owner-operator trucks than some of our competitors. Failure to maintain owner-operator business and relationships and increased industry competition for owner-operators could have a materially adverse effect on our operating results. During times of increased economic activity, we face heightened competition for owner-operators from other carriers. To the extent our turnover increases, we may be required to increase owner-operator compensation or take other measures to remain an attractive option for owner-operators. If we cannot attract sufficient owner-operators, or it becomes economically difficult for owner-operators to survive, we may not be able to maintain the percentage of our fleet provided by owner-operators or maintain our delivery schedules.

We may provide financing to certain qualified owner-operators who qualify for financing in order to lease trucks from us. If we are unable to provide such financing in the future, due to liquidity constraints or other restrictions, we may experience a decrease in the number of owner-operators available to fully operate our assets. Further, if owner-operators operating the trucks we finance default under or otherwise terminate the financing arrangement and we are unable to find a replacement owner-operator, we may incur losses on amounts owed to us with respect to the truck in addition to any losses we may incur as a result of idling the truck.

Our lease contracts with owner-operators may be governed by the federal and other leasing regulations, which impose specific requirements on us and/or on owner-operators. It is possible that we could face lawsuits alleging the violation of leasing obligations or failure to follow the contractual terms, which could result in liability.

We may utilize owner-operators to complete our services. These owner-operators are subject to similar regulation requirements, such as the electronic on-board recording and driver Hours of Service (HOS) requirements that apply to larger carriers, which may have a more significant impact on their operations, causing them to exit the transportation industry. Aside from when these third parties may use our trailing equipment to fulfill loads, we do not own the revenue equipment or control the drivers delivering these loads. The inability to obtain reliable third-party owner-operators could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and business growth.

If we are unable to recruit, develop and retain our key associates, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.

We are highly dependent upon the services of certain key employees, including our team of managers. We currently do not have employment agreements with any of our managers, and the loss of any of their services could negatively impact our operations and future profitability. Inadequate succession planning or unexpected departure of key managers could cause substantial disruption to our business operations, deplete our institutional knowledge base and erode our competitive advantage. Additionally, we may have to continue to recruit, develop and retain skilled and experienced service center managers if we are to realize our goal of expanding our operations and continuing our growth. Failure to recruit, develop and retain a core group of service center managers could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

Efforts by labor unions could divert management’s attention and could have a materially adverse effect on our operating results.

We face the risk that Congress or one or more states will issue or approve legislation significantly affecting our business and our relationship with our associates. We also face the risk that our associates, including drivers, may attempt to organize. Any attempt to organize by our associates could result in increased legal and other associated costs. In addition, if we were to enter into a collective bargaining agreement, the terms could negatively affect our costs, efficiency and ability to generate acceptable returns on the affected operations. Moreover, any labor disputes or work stoppages, whether or not our other associates unionize, could disrupt our operations and reduce our revenues.

Insurance and claims expenses could significantly reduce our earnings.

Our future insurance and claims expense might exceed historical levels, which could reduce our earnings. We self-insure or maintain a high deductible for a portion of our claims exposure resulting from workers’ compensation, auto liability, general liability, cargo and property damage claims, as well as associate health insurance. Estimating the number and severity of claims, as well as related judgment or settlement amounts is inherently difficult. This, along with legal expenses, incurred but not reported claims and other uncertainties can cause unfavorable differences between actual claim costs and our reserve estimates. We plan to reserve for anticipated losses and expenses and periodically evaluate and adjust our claims reserves to reflect our experience. However, ultimate results may differ from our estimates, which could result in losses over our reserved amounts.

We maintain insurance with licensed insurance carriers above the amounts which we retain. Although we believe our aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, it is possible that the amount of one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. If any claim were to exceed our coverage, we would bear the excess, in addition to our other self-insured/retained amounts. Insurance carriers have raised premiums for many businesses, including transportation companies. As a result, our insurance and claims expense could increase, or we could raise our self-insured retention or deductible when our policies are renewed or replaced. Our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if (i) cost per claim, premiums, or the number of claims significantly exceeds our estimates, (ii) we experience a claim in excess of our coverage limits, (iii) our insurance carriers fail to gain sufficient market acceptance,pay on our insurance claims or (iv) we experience a claim for which coverage is not provided.

16

Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations, the violation of which could result in substantial fines or penalties.

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations dealing with the hauling and handling of hazardous materials, waste and other oil, fuel storage tanks, air emissions from our vehicles and facilities, engine idling and discharge and retention of storm water. Our truck terminals often are located in industrial areas where groundwater or other forms of environmental contamination could occur. Our operations involve the risks of fuel spillage or seepage, environmental damage and hazardous waste disposal, among others. Certain of our facilities have waste oil or fuel storage tanks and fueling islands. If we are involved in a spill or other accident involving hazardous substances, if there are releases of hazardous substances we transport, if soil or groundwater contamination is found at our facilities or results from our operations, or if we are found to be in violation of applicable environmental laws or regulations, we could owe cleanup costs and incur related liabilities, including substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results.

We have significant ongoing capital requirements that could affect our profitability if we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms.

The trucking industry generally, and our trucking business in particular, are capital intensive and asset heavy, and our policy of maintaining a young, technology-equipped fleet requires us to expend significant amounts in capital expenditures annually. We expect to pay for projected capital expenditures with cash flows from operations, proceeds from equity sales or financing available under our existing debt instruments. If we were unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, we would need to seek alternative sources of capital, including financing, to meet our capital requirements. In the event that we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms in the future, we may have to limit our fleet size, enter into less favorable financing arrangements or operate our revenue equipment for longer periods, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our profitability.

The seasonal pattern generally experienced in the trucking industry may affect our periodic results during traditionally slower shipping periods and winter months.

In the trucking industry, revenue generally follows a seasonal pattern which may affect our operating results. Operating levels of the oil industry have historically been lower in the winter months because of adverse winter weather conditions. Revenue can also be affected by other adverse weather conditions, holidays and the number of business days during a given period because revenue is directly related to the available working days. From time to time, we may also suffer short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, earthquakes, and explosions that could harm our results of operations or make our results of operations more volatile.

We may be subject to various claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, and increases in the amount or severity of these claims and lawsuits could adversely affect us.

We are exposed to various claims and litigation related to commercial disputes, personal injury, property damage, environmental liability and other matters. Proceedings include claims by third parties, and certain proceedings have been certified or purport to be class actions. Developments in regulatory, legislative or judicial standards, material changes to litigation trends, or a catastrophic accident or series of accidents, involving any or all of property damage, personal injury, and environmental liability could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.

If we commence operations and produce oil from a drilling, then unless we replace our reserves with new reserves and develop those reserves, our reserves and production will decline, which would adversely affect our future cash flows and results of operations.

Once we start oil production, then producing oil reservoirs generally are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. Unless we conduct successful ongoing exploration and development activities or continually acquire properties containing proved reserves, our proved reserves will decline as those reserves are produced. Our future reserves and production, and therefore our future cash flow and results of operations, are highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing our current reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable reserves. We may not be able to develop, find or acquire sufficient additional reserves to replace our current and future production. If we are unable to replace our current and future production, the value of our reserves will decrease, and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Drilling for and producing crude oil are high risk activities with many uncertainties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our proposed drilling and operating activities will be subject to many risks, including the risk that we will not discover commercially productive reservoirs. Drilling for crude oil can be unprofitable, not only from dry holes, but from productive wells that do not produce sufficient revenues to return a profit. In addition, our drilling and producing operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of other factors, including:

unusual or unexpected geological formations and miscalculations;
fires;
explosions and blowouts;
pipe or cement failures;

17

environmental hazards, such as natural gas leaks, oil spills, pipeline and tank ruptures, encountering naturally occurring radioactive materials, and unauthorized discharges of toxic gases, brine, well stimulation and completion fluids, or other pollutants into the surface and subsurface environment;
loss of drilling fluid circulation;
title problems for the properties on which we drill and resulting restrictions or termination of lease for oil drilling and production operations;

facility or equipment malfunctions;
unexpected operational events, especially the need to drill significantly deeper than originally contemplated or finding, despite an engineering study to the contrary, that the drilling site is a dry hole that produces no appreciable amounts of crude oil or no crude oil;
shortages of skilled personnel or unexpected loss of key drilling and production workers;
shortages or delivery delays of equipment and services or of water used in hydraulic fracturing activities;
compliance with environmental and other regulatory requirements and any unexpected remedial requirements for violations of environmental or other regulatory requirements;
shareholder activism and activities by non-governmental organizations to restrict the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas so as to minimize emissions of greenhouse gases of “GHG’s”;
natural disasters; and
adverse weather conditions.

Any of these risks can cause substantial losses, including personal injury or loss of life; severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution, environmental contamination, clean-up responsibilities, loss of wells, repairs to resume operations; and regulatory fines or penalties.

Insurance against all operational risks may not be available to us or not affordable for us. Additionally, we may elect not to obtain insurance if we believe that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the perceived risks presented. The occurrence of an event that is not covered in full or in part by insurance could have a material adverse impact on our business activities, financial condition and results of operations. We only have standard business liability and casualty insurance as of the date of this prospectus. We will not pay for or require, and cannot afford, insurance covering drilling, production and storage of oil and establishing oil rigs until we receive sufficient funding from this Offering.

The extension of our active oil and gas mineral leases may be subject to performing continuous drilling operations.

Our oil and gas mineral leases may contain acreage that is either held by production or not. In order to extend the leased acreage not held by production, the Company must maintain minimum continuous drilling operations in order to extend these leases to future periods. The Company’s inability to perform operations during any given period could result in the Company’s losing the rights to future operations on that lease.

The potential lack of availability of, or cost of, drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and crude oil field services could adversely affect our ability to execute on a timely basis our exploration and development plans prospects,within our budget.

When the prices of crude oil increase, or the demand for equipment and services is greater than the supply in certain areas, we could encounter an increase in the cost of securing drilling rigs, equipment and supplies. In addition, larger producers may be more likely to secure access to such equipment by offering more lucrative terms. If we are unable to acquire access to such resources, or can obtain access only at higher prices, our ability to convert our reserves into cash flow could be delayed and the cost of producing those reserves could increase significantly, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.condition.

 

Our abilityWe are subject to manufactureenvironmental, health and distribute commercially viable solar cells is unproven, which could have a detrimental effect on our ability to generate or sustain revenues.safety laws and regulations and related compliance expenditures and liabilities.

 

The technologiesOnce commenced, our oil drilling and production operations will be subject to numerous and significant federal, state, local and foreign laws, and other requirements governing or relating to the environment. Our facilities could experience incidents, malfunctions and other unplanned events, such as spills of hazardous materials that may result in personal injury, penalties and property damage. In addition, certain environmental laws may result in liability, regardless of fault, concerning contamination at a range of properties, including properties currently leased or operated by us and properties where we disposed of, or arranged for disposal of, waste and other hazardous materials. As such, the operation of our facilities carries an inherent risk of environmental liabilities and may result in our involvement from time to time in administrative and judicial proceedings relating to such matters. While we will useimplement environmental management programs designed to manufacture solar cellscontinually improve environmental, health and safety performance, we cannot assure you that such liabilities including significant required capital expenditures, as well as the costs for complying with environmental laws and regulations, will not have never been utilizeda material adverse effect on a commercial basis. Our technology, while intended to create a highly efficient solar cells may never achieve technical or commercial viability. Allour business, financial condition, results of the tests conducted to date by us with respect to the technology have been performed in a limited scale environmentoperations and the same or similar results may not be obtainable at competitive costs on a large-scale commercial basis. We have never utilized technology under the conditions or in the volumes that will be required for us to be profitable and cannot predict all of the difficulties that may arise. Accordingly, our technology may not perform successfully on a commercial basis and may never generate any revenues or be profitable.cash flows.

18

 

Oil prices are volatile. Once we commence oil production, any sustained decline in oil prices could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our capital expenditure obligations and financial commitments.

The prices we receive for our oil production will heavily influence our revenue, profitability, access to capital, future rate of growth and carrying value of our properties. Oil is a commodity and its price may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and market uncertainty.Lower commodity prices may reduce our cash flows and borrowing ability. If we are unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms, our ability to develop future reserves could be adversely affected. Also, using lower prices in estimating proved reserves may result in a reduction in proved reserve volumes due to economic limits.

If we are required to curtail our drilling program, we may be unable to continue to hold leases that are scheduled to expire, which may further reduce our reserves. As a result, a substantial or eliminationextended decline in commodity prices may materially and adversely affect our future business, financial condition, results of government subsidiesoperations, liquidity and economic incentivesability to finance planned capital expenditures.

Historically, oil prices have been volatile. The prices we receive for on-grid solar electricity applicationsour production, and the levels of our production, depend on numerous factors beyond our control, which include the following:

worldwide and regional economic conditions impacting the global supply and demand for oil;

the price and quantity of foreign imports of oil;

political and economic conditions in or affecting other producing regions or countries, including the Middle East, Africa, South America and Russia;

actions of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, its members and other state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and production controls;

the level of global exploration, development and production;

the level of global inventories;

prevailing prices on local price indexes in the area in which we operate;

the proximity, capacity, cost and availability of gathering and transportation facilities;

localized and global supply and demand fundamentals and transportation availability;

the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and transporting reserves;

weather conditions and other natural disasters;

technological advances affecting energy consumption;

the price and availability of alternative fuels;

expectations about future commodity prices; and

U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. governmental regulation and taxes.

Conservation measures and technological advances could reduce demand for our solar modulesoil and harm our business plans.natural gas.

 

Fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements, increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas, technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices could reduce demand for oil. The reduction, eliminationimpact of the changing demand for oil may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Climate change legislation and regulations restricting or expirationregulating emissions of government subsidies and economic incentives for solar electricitygreenhouse gases (“GHGs”) could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the diminished competitivenessoil and natural gas while the potential physical effects of solar energy relativeclimate change could disrupt our production and cause us to conventionalincur significant costs in preparing for or responding to those effects.

Climate change continues to attract considerable public and non-solar renewable sources of energy, which would negatively affect the growth of the solar energy industry overall. We believe that the near-term growth of the market for on-grid applications, where solar energy is used to supplement the electricity a consumer purchases from the utility network, depends significantly on the availability and size of government and economic incentives. Currently the cost of solar electricity substantially exceeds the retail price of electricity in every significant market in the world.scientific attention. As a result, numerous proposals have been made and are likely to continue to be made at the international, national, regional, and state levels of government to monitor and limit emissions of GHGs. While no comprehensive climate change legislation has been implemented at the federal statelevel, the Environmental Protection Agency or “EPA” and local governmental bodiesstates or groupings of states have pursued legal initiatives in many countries have provided subsidiesrecent years that seek to reduce GHG emissions through efforts that include consideration of cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting and tracking programs and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. In particular, the EPA has adopted rules under authority of the U.S. Clean Air Act of “CAA” that, among other things, establish certain permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources, which reviews could require securing permits at covered facilities emitting GHGs and meeting defined technological standards for those GHG emissions.

19

The EPA has also adopted rules requiring the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain petroleum and natural gas system sources in the formUnited States, including, among others, onshore production.

Federal agencies also have begun directly regulating emissions of tariffs, rebates, tax write-offsmethane, a GHG, from oil and natural gas operations. In June 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing NSPS Subpart OOOOa, that requires certain new, modified or reconstructed facilities in the oil and natural gas sector to reduce these methane gas and VOC emissions. However, in April 2017, the EPA announced that it would review this 2016 methane rule and would initiate reconsideration proceedings to potentially revise or rescind portions of the rule. Subsequently, effective June 2, 2017, the EPA issued a 90-day stay of certain requirements under the methane rule, but this stay was vacated by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on July 3, 2017 and on August 10, 2017, the D.C. Circuit rejected petitions for anen banc review of its July 3, 2017 ruling. In the interim, on July 16, 2017, the EPA issued a proposed rule that would stay subpart OOOOa for two years, but this proposed rule is not yet final and may be subject to legal challenges.The court affirmed that the EPA must go through the formal rule change procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) to amend the 2016 rule on methane gas emissions.The EPA continued to evaluate the rule and proposed additional amendments. OnOctober 15, 2018, EPA proposed rule changes to reduce restrictions on methane emissions from oil and gas production.

The Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) also finalized rules regarding the control of methane emissions rules in November 2016 (“Revision Rule”) that apply to oil and natural gas exploration and development activities on public and tribal lands. The rules seek to minimize venting and flaring of emissions from storage tanks and other incentivesequipment, and also impose leak detection and repair requirements. The U.S. Department of the Interior attempted to end-users, distributors, systems integratorssuspend this rule, however on February 22, 2018, a U.S. District Court blocked the suspension. On September 18, 2018, BLM releases the final version of the Revision Rule, which was published in the Federal Register on September 28, 2018 and manufacturerswas to go into effect on November 27, 2018. On November 27, 2018, the attorneys general for California and New Mexico filed suit alleging BLM violated the Administrative Procedure Act, Mineral Leasing Act, and National Environmental Policy Act. On September 28, 2018, 18 environmental groups also legally challenged the Revision Rule.

The BLM rules on rolling back methane gas emissions under the Revision Rule remains in place at this time, but the future status of photovoltaic products. Manythe rule change is unclear.

President Trump’s Administration has rolled back, cancelled or sought to roll back or cancel numerous rules restricting GHGs in the energy industry. These efforts have been mostly challenged in court. Whether the roll back of environmental regulations to cap or reduce GHGs will continue or survive legal challenges, as well as the impact on these government incentives could expire, phase-out over time, exhaustrollback efforts by Democratic Party taking control of the allocated funding or require renewalU.S. House of Representatives in 2019, is uncertain as of the date of this prospectus. Company believes there is growing public support for the anti-GHG/environmental movement that may result in future changes in regulation, more anti-GHG rulings in courts and legal requirements for oil and gas production that may reduce the demand for oil and gas in the future, perhaps near future, as well as making oil and gas production more expensive and difficult in terms of regulation to conduct. The success of President Trump appointing conservative jurists to federal courts since 2017 presents another possible factor in future GHG regulation, which factor is not possible to ascertain in terms of impact on GHG regulation as of the date of this prospectus. In December 2015, the United States joined the international community at the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France that prepared an agreement requiring member countries to review and “represent a progression” in their intended nationally determined contributions, which set GHG emission reduction goals every five years beginning in 2020. This “Paris Agreement” was signed by the applicable authority. Even thoughUnited States in April 2016 and entered into force in November 2016; however, this agreement does not create any binding obligations for nations to limit their GHG emissions. On June 1, 2017, President Donald Trump announced that the priceUnited States plans to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and to seek negotiations either to re-enter the Paris Agreement on different terms or to establish a new framework agreement. The Paris Agreement provides for a four-year exit date of electricity from conventional sources continuesNovember 2020. The United States’ adherence to rise,the exit process and/or the terms on which the United States may re-enter the Paris Agreement or a reduction, eliminationseparately negotiated agreement are unclear at this time.

The adoption and implementation of any international, federal or expirationstate legislation or regulations that require reporting of government subsidies and economic incentives for solar electricityGHGs or otherwise restrict emissions of GHGs could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Increasing concentrations of GHG in the diminished competitivenessEarth’s atmosphere may in all likelihood and based on current and widespread scientific opinion produce climate changes that have significant, perhaps catastrophic, physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of solarstorms, droughts, floods and other climatic events. If any such climatic events were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and the financial condition and operations of our end user customers and oil and gas product consumers. Climate changes may force radical, unexpected changes in regulation of GHG and energy which would in turn hurt our salesindustries like oil and financial condition.gas.

 

8

20

  

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS

WeOur common stock is quoted on the OTCQB, which may have a substantial number of authorized commonan unfavorable impact on our stock price and preferred shares available for future issuance that could cause dilution of our stockholders’ interest and adversely impact the rights of holders of our common stock.liquidity.

 

We have a total of 100,000,000 shares ofOur common stock and 5,000,000is quoted on the OTCQB, which is a significantly more limited trading market than the New York Stock Exchange, or the NASDAQ Stock Market. The quotation of the Company’s shares of preferred stock authorized for issuance. As of July 1, 2016, we have 36,021,210 shares of common stock issued and outstanding (includingon the shares of common stock soldOTCQB may result in the Offering) and no preferred shares issued or outstanding. As of July 1, 2016, we had 63,978,790 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stocka less liquid market available for issuance. Further, out of the 63,978,790 unissued shares of common stock, as of July 1, 2016, we have reserved 4,336,625existing and potential shareholders to trade shares of our common stock, for issuance uponcould depress the exercisetrading price of outstanding warrants, 1,500,000our common stock and could have a long-term adverse impact on our ability to raise capital in the future.

There is limited liquidity on the OTCQB, which may result in stock price volatility and inaccurate quote information.

When fewer shares of a security are being traded on the OTCQB, price volatility may increase and price movement may outpace the ability to deliver accurate quote information. Due to lower trading volumes in shares of our common stock, upon conversionthere may be a lower likelihood of outstanding convertible notes, and 5,497,142 additionalone’s orders for shares available for future grants under our stock incentive plan and no shares reserved for conversion of our preferred stock. We may seek financing that could result in the issuance of additional shares of our capital stock and/or rights to acquire additional shares of our capital stock. We may also make acquisitions that result in issuances of additional shares of our capital stock. Those additional issuances of capital stock would result in a significant reduction of your percentage interest in us. Furthermore, the book value per share of our common stock being executed, and current prices may differ significantly from the price one was quoted at the time of one’s order entry.

If we are unable to adequately fund our operations, we may be reduced. This reduction would occur if the exercise price of any issued warrants, the conversion price of any convertible notes or the conversion ratio of any issued preferred stock is lower than the book value per shareforced to voluntarily file for deregistration of our common stock atwith the time of such exercise or conversion.SEC.

 

The additionCompliance with the periodic reporting requirements required by the SEC consumes a considerable amount of both internal, as well external, resources and represents a significant cost for us. If we are unable to continue to devote adequate funding and the resources needed to maintain such compliance, while continuing our operations, we could be forced to deregister with the SEC. After the deregistration process, our common stock would only be tradable on the “Pink Sheets” and could suffer a decrease in or absence of liquidity.

Because we became public by means of a “reverse merger”, we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.

Additional risks may exist since we became public through a “reverse merger.” Securities analysts of major brokerage firms may not provide coverage of us since there is little incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock. We cannot assure you that brokerage firms will want to conduct any secondary offerings on behalf of our Company in the future.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market could lower the price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise funds in future securities offerings.

Future sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock intoin the public market, or by the registration of any of our other securities under the Securities Actperception that such sales may significantly and negatively affect the prevailing market price for our common stock. The future sales of shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and options may have a depressive effect on the market price of our common stock, as such warrants and options would be more likely to be exercised at a time when the price of our common stock is greater than the exercise price.

We effected our 1-for-250 reverse stock split on March 18, 2016. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to comply with the minimum price requirements of the NASDAQ Capital Market.

We effected our 1-for-250 reverse stock split on March 18, 2016, with the intent to list the common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market. We effectuated the reverse stock split in order to achieve the requisite increase in the market price of our common stock to be in compliance with the minimum price requirements of the NASDAQ Capital Market. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock following the reverse stock split will remain at the level required for continuing compliance with that requirement. It is not uncommon for the market price of a company’s common stock to decline in the period following a reverse stock split. If the market price of our common stock declines following the effectuation of the reverse stock split, the percentage decline may be greater than would occur, in the absence of the reverse stock split. In any event, other factors unrelated to the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, such as negative financial or operational results, could adversely affect the then prevailing market price of our common stock and jeopardizecould make it more difficult for us to raise funds in the future through a public offering of our securities.

Our common stock is thinly traded, so you may be unable to sell at or near asking prices or at all if you need to sell your shares to raise money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.

Currently, the Company’s common stock is quoted in the OTCQB and future trading volume may be limited by the fact that many major institutional investment funds, including mutual funds, as well as individual investors follow a policy of not investing in OTCQB stocks and certain major brokerage firms restrict their brokers from recommending OTCQB stocks because they are considered speculative, volatile and thinly traded. The OTCQB market is an inter-dealer market much less regulated than the major exchanges and our common stock is subject to abuses, volatility and shorting. Thus, there is currently no broadly followed and established trading market for the Company’s common stock. An established trading market may never develop or be maintained. Active trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and more efficient execution of buy and sell orders. Absence of an active trading market reduces the liquidity of the shares traded there.

Our common stock is subject to price volatility unrelated to our operations.

The market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, including market perception of our ability to maintainachieve our planned growth, quarterly operating results of other companies in the NASDAQ Capital Market’s minimumsame industry, trading volume in our common stock, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets or other developments affecting the Company’s competitors or the Company itself. In addition, the OTCQB is subject to extreme price requirements.and volume fluctuations in general. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our common stock.

21

 

ThereWe are subject to penny stock regulations and restrictions and you may not be an active market forhave difficulty selling shares of our common stock.

 

Our common stock is currently quoted OTCQB maintained byon the OTC Market Group Inc.OTCQB. Our common stock is subject to the requirements of Rule 15(g)-9, promulgated under the symbol “EARK”. However,Securities Exchange Act as long as the price of our common stock is below $5.00 per share. Under such rule, broker-dealers who recommend low-priced securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must satisfy special sales practice requirements, including a requirement that they make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s consent prior to the transaction. The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 also requires additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock. Generally, the Commission defines a penny stock as any equity security not traded on a national exchange that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. The required penny stock disclosures include the delivery, prior to any transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with it. Such requirements could severely limit the market liquidity of the securities and the ability of purchasers to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Because we do not intend to pay dividends, shareholders will benefit from an investment in our common stock only if it appreciates in value.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our preferred stock or common stock. For the foreseeable future, it is expected that earnings, if any, generated from our operations will be used to finance the growth of our business, and that no assurance candividends will be given thatpaid to holders of the Company’s common stock. As a result, the success of an active trading market forinvestment in our common stock will develop and continue. As a result, you may find it more difficult to purchase, dispose of and obtain accurate quotations as to the value of our common stock. If we are unable to achieve the NASDAQ Capital Market listing requirements,depend upon any future appreciation in its value. There can be no guarantee that our common stock would continue to trade on the OTCQB.

will appreciate in value.

 

The reverseprice of our common stock split may decreasebecome volatile, which could lead to losses by investors and costly securities litigation.

The trading price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate in response to factors such as:

actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;
announcements of developments by us or our competitors;
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
adoption of new accounting standards affecting our industry;
additions or departures of key personnel;
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
sales of our common stock or other securities in the open market; and
other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

The stock market is subject to significant price and volume fluctuations. In the liquiditypast, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against such a company. Litigation initiated against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and Company resources, which could harm our business and financial condition.

Investors may experience dilution of their ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock.

 

The liquidityWe intend to continue to seek financing through the issuance of equity or convertible securities to fund our operations. In the future, we may also issue additional equity securities resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present shareholders. We may also issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions or for other business purposes. The future issuance of any such additional shares of common stock will result in dilution to our shareholders and may be affected adversely bycreate downward pressure on the 1-for-250 reverse stock split given the reduced number of shares outstanding following the reverse stock split, especially if the markettrading price of our common stock does not increase as a result of the reverse stock split.stock.

9

 

Following the reverse stock split, the resultingThe market price of our common stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not improve.

 

Although we believe that a higher market price of our common stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, we cannot assure youthere can be no assurance that the reverse stock splitwe will attract new investors, including institutional investors. In addition, there can be no assurance that the market price of our common stock will satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. As a result, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not necessarily improve.

22

 

Our stock could be subject to volatility.

 

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

 

 actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results;
   
 changes in market valuations of companies in our industry;
   
 announcements by us or our competitors of new strategies, significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic relationships, joint ventures, capital commitments or other material developments that may affect our prospects;
   
 shortfalls in our operating results from levels forecasted by company management;
   
 additions or departures of our key personnel;
   
 sales of our capital stock in the future;
   
 liquidity or cash flow constraints; and
   
 fluctuations in stock market prices and volume, which are particularly common for the securities of emerging technology companies, such as us.

 

We may not pay dividends on our common stockFuture changes in the foreseeable future.fair value of outstanding warrants could result in income volatility.

 

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock. We might pay dividendsChanges in the future atfair value of the discretionwarrant liabilities caused by stock price volatility or other factors impacting the fair value determined by the Black Scholes model will impact other income or expense.

Our board of our Boarddirectors has authorized the designation of Directors.  We are unlikely to pay dividends at any time inpreferred stock without shareholder approval that have voting rights that adversely affect the foreseeable future; rather, we are likely to retain earnings, if any, to fund our operationsvoting power of holders of the Company’s common stock and to develop and expand our business.may have an adverse effect on its stock price.

 

Future sales and issuances of our capitalWe are authorized to issue “blank check” preferred stock orwithout stockholder approval, which could adversely impact the rights to purchase capital stock could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our stock price to decline.

We may issue additional securities following the completion of this offering. Future sales and issuances of our capital stock or rights to purchase our capital stock could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders. We may sell common stock, convertible securities and other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner as we may determine from time to time. If we sell any such securities in subsequent transactions, our stockholders may be materially diluted. New investors in such subsequent transactions could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock.

 

Our Articles of Incorporation authorize us to issue up to 5,000 shares of “blank check: preferred stock. Any additional preferred stock that we issue in the future may rank ahead of our common stock in terms of dividend priority or liquidation premiums and may have greater voting rights than our common stock. In addition, such preferred stock may contain provisions allowing those shares to be converted into shares of common stock, which could dilute the value of common stock to current stockholders and could adversely affect the market price, if any, of our common stock. In addition, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of our company. Although we have no present intention to issue any additional shares of authorized preferred stock, there can be no assurance that we will not do so in the future.

23

SPECIALCAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY AND
MARKET DATA

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This prospectusregistration statement on Form S-1 contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaningforward-looking statements under Section 21E of the Private Securities Litigation ReformExchange Act of 1995 (PSLRA). All statementsand other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws including:that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control including without limitation the following: (i) our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions are subject to change at any projectionstime at our discretion; (ii) our plans and results of earnings, revenuesoperations will be affected by our ability to manage growth; and (iii) other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or “SEC”).

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,’’ “will,’’ “should,’’ “could,’’ “expects,’’ “plans,’’ “intends,’’ “anticipates,’’ “believes,’’ “estimates,’’ “predicts,’’ “seeks,” “potential,’’ or “continue’’ or the negative of such terms or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new products, services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan” or “anticipate” and other similar words. Such forward-looking statements may be contained in the sections “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business,” among other places in this prospectus.

comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in ourthe forward-looking statements are reasonable, actualwe cannot guarantee future results, could differ materially from those projectedlevels of activity, performance or assumed. Our future financial conditionachievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and resultscompleteness of operations, as well as anysuch statements.

These forward-looking statements are subject to change and to inherent risks and uncertainties, such as those disclosed in this prospectus. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement.

10

SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

We sold units to the selling securityholders for $4.00 per unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock for $5.00. Through March 31, 2016, we received proceeds from subscriptions equal to $9,555 for 2,388,750 units. From April 1, 2016 through April 28, 2016, we received proceeds of $7,792 for 1,947,875 units. In total, we received proceeds of $17,347 for 4,336,625 units, consisting of 4,336,625 shares and 4,336,625 warrants.

This prospectus covers the resale from time to time by the selling securityholders identified in the table below of up to an aggregate of (i) 4,336,625 shares issued pursuant to the conversion of certain convertible promissory notes and (ii) 4,336,625 issuable upon the exercise of warrants, in each case, issued in the Private Offering.

The exercise price of each warrant is $5.00 per share, subject to adjustment for stock splits and corporate reorganizations. Each warrant is exercisable on or before December 31, 2018. Ecoark Holdings may require a warrant holder to exercise all, but not less than all of the unexercised portion of the warrant, upon written notice that (i) the last reported sale price of common stock on each of 60 consecutive trading days exceeded $7.50 and (ii) the average daily trading volume (as reported on Bloomberg) of the common stock over the 60 consecutive trading period was not less than 100,000 shares on the trading market on which the common stock is listed or designated for quotation. In the event that the holder does not exercise the warrant, the holder shall forfeit any rights under the warrant, including the right to exercise the warrant to the extent not previously exercised and the warrant shall be treated as canceled for all purposes.

We are registering the shares of common stock hereby pursuant to the terms of the subscription agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) among us and the investors in the Private Offering in order to permit the selling securityholders identified in the table below to offer the shares for resale from time to time. Because the shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of our warrants are subject to adjustment if our shares of common stock are subdivided or combined (by any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, scheme, arrangement or otherwise) the number of shares that will actually be issuable upon any exercise thereof may be more or less than the number of shares being offered by this prospectus.

None of the selling securityholders are licensed broker-dealers or affiliates of licensed broker-dealers. 

The table below (i) lists the selling securityholders and other information regarding the beneficial ownership (except with respect to the totals in Column 2, as determined under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder) of our common stock by each of the selling securityholders (including securities issued in transactions unrelated to the Private Offerings, if any); (ii) have been prepared based upon information furnished to us by the selling securityholders; and (iii) to our knowledge, is accuratemade only as of the date of this prospectus. The selling securityholders may sell all, some or none of their shares in this offering. The selling securityholders identified in the table below may have sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of some or all of theirs shares since the date of this prospectus in transactions exempt from or not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Information concerning the selling securityholders may change from time to time and, if necessary, we will amend or supplement this prospectus accordingly and as required.

11

  Common Shares Being Registered    
  Shares Shares Underlying Warrants Total Shares Being Registered Common Shares Owned After Sale
Stephen L. O'Bryan Declaration of Trust, 3-23-89  300,000   300,000   600,000   600,000   0 
AMB Financial, LLC  200,000   200,000   400,000   400,000   0 
The Stephen D. Kleppe and Shirley R. Kleppe Trust Dated August 20, 2013  200,000   200,000   400,000   400,000   0 
Well of Oath, LLC  125,000   125,000   250,000   250,000   0 
Dennis J. Loudermilk  100,000   100,000   200,000   200,000   0 
Kelly & Barry Schmidt JTWRS  93,750   93,750   187,500   187,500   0 
EA 2015 LLC  75,000   75,000   150,000   150,000   0 
The Verna Mae Gift Trust  71,250   71,250   142,500   142,500   0 
Matthews Family Revocable Trust  65,000   65,000   130,000   130,000   0 
John C. Thompson  65,000   65,000   130,000   130,000   0 
Lakeshore Capital, LLC  62,500   62,500   125,000   125,000   0 
Buckner Family Trust  62,500   62,500   125,000   125,000   0 
Roland and Lisa Emanuel  62,500   62,500   125,000   125,000   0 
Greg Dollarhyde  50,000   50,000   100,000   100,000   0 
Bryan S. Mick and Kelly S. Mick JTWRS  50,000   50,000   100,000   100,000   0 
Bryan & Carrie McDermott  50,000   50,000   100,000   100,000   0 
Kevin Olson  50,000   50,000   100,000   100,000   0 
Betaroan, LLC  50,000   50,000   100,000   100,000   0 
Laura Duke Revocable Trust  50,000   50,000   100,000   100,000   0 
Hames Family Trust  50,000   50,000   100,000   100,000   0 
MJ Strategies, LLC  48,750   48,750   97,500   97,500   0 
Jeffrey L. Augspurgor Trust UAD 10-23-03  42,500   42,500   85,000   85,000   0 
LGMG, LLC  37,500   37,500   75,000   75,000   0 
The Oreste & Marie Living Trust  37,500   37,500   75,000   75,000   0 
Edward O. Battaglia TOD  37,500   37,500   75,000   75,000   0 
David Tyner  31,250   31,250   62,500   62,500   0 
Brian Brogger  31,250   31,250   62,500   62,500   0 
Jeffrey Rockacy  31,250   31,250   62,500   62,500   0 
Levlo Legacy, LLC  30,000   30,000   60,000   60,000   0 
Jonathan Lane Jeanes  30,000   30,000   60,000   60,000   0 
J & T Meadows Ltd  30,000   30,000   60,000   60,000   0 
Baisch Revocable Living Trust  27,000   27,000   54,000   54,000   0 
Marsh Revocable Trust  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Charles M. Beck Von Peccoz  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Giardino Family Trust  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
John Spadar & Julia Singer JTWRS  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Michael Schultz  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Richard Adler  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Deborah A. Harwood  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Jill J. McCracken  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
My voices, LLC  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
John P. Fitzgerald  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Philip Lee Keesling  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Patrick & Brneda Simpkins  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
William R. Taylor  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Timothy Doherty  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
IRA Services Trust Company FBO David Rourke Sr.  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
One Tree Hill Revocable Trust  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Richard G. Whittier  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Ling Family Trust 7-16-2009  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Michael &  Margo Hamsher  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Bowen Family Revocable Trust  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
W-Y Transport Inc. Profit Sharing Trust  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Lewis Yarborough  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
Parkhill Clinic For Women Profit Sharing Plan Acct #460695937  25,000   25,000   50,000   50,000   0 
David Scott Smith  22,500   22,500   45,000   45,000   0 
Deborah A. Thomas  20,000   20,000   40,000   40,000   0 
Gary D. Post & Mary H. Post  20,000   20,000   40,000   40,000   0 
James & Mary Kate Dillon  20,000   20,000   40,000   40,000   0 
IRA Services Trust Company FBO Jarrod Sherman  20,000   20,000   40,000   40,000   0 

12

  Common Shares Being Registered    
  Shares Shares Underlying Warrants Total Shares Being Registered Common Shares Owned After Sale
Kelly Lawson  20,000   20,000   40,000   40,000   0 
Stephen & Colleen Blauer  20,000   20,000   40,000   40,000   0 
Roger Kraig Kemp  19,625   19,625   39,250   39,250   0 
Daniel & Julie Nelson  18,750   18,750   37,500   37,500   0 
Henry Cleve Stubblefield  18,750   18,750   37,500   37,500   0 
Monroe P. Guest  18,750   18,750   37,500   37,500   0 
The Jere and Marian Chrispens CRUT  18,750   18,750   37,500   37,500   0 
Zackery Holley  18,750   18,750   37,500   37,500   0 
BF or Rebecca C. Gibbons  15,000   15,000   30,000   30,000   0 
Closed Loop Waste, LLC  13,750   13,750   27,500   27,500   0 
Joseph & Janet Spano JTWRS  13,750   13,750   27,500   27,500   0 
Joseph L. Geierman Jr. and Joyce C. Geierman  13,000   13,000   26,000   26,000   0 
The Hordynski Family Trust  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Todd & Jenny Laddusaw  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Mark Hancock  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Jerry D. Reed  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
James Peterson & Jennifer A. Peterson  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Kevin Nichols  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Andrea J. Morneau Family Trust 9-12-06  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Piece O'Cake LLC  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Cerebral Output, LLC  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Nancy Coleman  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Dean F. Eisma  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
IRA Services Trust Company CFBO James E. Cassidy  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Jason Rex Rivers  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
David Matthew Wilkett Cynthia Wilkett JT TEN TOD DTD  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Stephen L. Kass  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Capital Plus, LLC  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Steven & Carolyn Taraborelli  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
DWC Consultants, Inc  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Leonard E. & Susan J. Hinton  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
KGKBKR Inc.  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Lawrence Edmund Krynski  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Larry D. Durham  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Neil Adcock  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Carabello Family LLC  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
RC Moore  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Dean I. Creviston and Brenda S. Creviston Trust UA 5-17-09  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
William W Cutter Trust  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Smith Family Revocable Living Trust  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
James S. Hodson  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 

13

  Common Shares Being Registered    
  Shares Shares Underlying Warrants Total Shares Being Registered Common Shares Owned After Sale
RWT Trust  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
David Harris  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
The Kasner Revocable Living Trust  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Ashley Erin Mason & George L. Mallory Joint Tentants JT TEN  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Andrew Clemons  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Matt L. Mawby  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Frank E. French Jr. 1994 Trust  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
RJM Ventures, LLC  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Paul W. Mullins  12,500   12,500   25,000   25,000   0 
Darwin Jay McManus  12,000   12,000   24,000   24,000   0 
Paul Hagen  11,000   11,000   22,000   22,000   0 
The Diana Lyn Kietzman Living Trust UA 6-25-1998  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Dawn Weerasinghe  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Barry Carter  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Millers Supermarket, Inc  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Jeffrey K. Latham  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Mark Breneman and Alyce Breneman  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Larry R. Thompson  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Shannon L. Clark  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Mark B. Schwanz  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Harlin F. or Lilla M. Hames  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Paul Reichert  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Don & Stacey Carter  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
Robert & Martha Buhler  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
P L J Investments, LLC  10,000   10,000   20,000   20,000   0 
N. Lee Dillow  8,000   8,000   16,000   16,000   0 
The JH Revocable Trust dated 1/14/2014  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Dustin Weaver  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Kimberly R. Fairchild  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Corey Eschweiler  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Domenico Iriti  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Thomas A. Erdmier  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Oldham Properties Ltd.  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Thomas Kent Kelsay  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
IRA Services Trust Company CFBO David Johnson IRA 346019  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Gerald David Adkisson and Joel Adkisson Joint Tenants in Common  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
William M. Wilson  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Tim & Mari Maroushek  7,500   7,500   15,000   15,000   0 
Marian L. Beck Von Peccoz  7,000   7,000   14,000   14,000   0 
Michael A. Simons 2002 Rev Trust 5/11/2002  7,000   7,000   14,000   14,000   0 
Blue Oak Trust  7,000   7,000   14,000   14,000   0 
Donald Lovering  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Timothy L. Shugrue  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Ryan Coleman  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Sandra G. Williams  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Juliet McIver  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Jeremy Sanders and Melanie Phipps Sanders  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Susan Sullivan  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
The Margaret J. Baurer Living Trust Dated 2/27/2013  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
IRA Services Trust Company CFBO Phillip Kuehne  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Hyland Family Trust  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
IRA Services Trust Company CFBO Lawrence Kistler Roth IRA  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Dennis Bridges  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Marie Hayman  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Cathy L. Aust Trust DTD 10-14-13  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 

14

  Common Shares Being Registered    
  Shares Shares Underlying Warrants Total Shares Being Registered Common Shares Owned After Sale
Gail H. Van Kleek Rev. Trust  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Richard A. Mickelsen  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Kurt Bachmayer & Lisa Dalke JTWRS  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Jordan Sherman  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Ralph Viscomi  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Shell Family Trust  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
John P Gannon Trust  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Troy & Kathleen Miller JTWRS  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Robert Munson & Kathy Munson  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Terry A. Merritt  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Kirk R. Mickelsen  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Brian J. Leonard & Jennifer A. Leonard  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Derek M Guirand  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
James Horosky  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Peter & Laura Burke JTWRS  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Martha J Leiby Rev Trsut 6-14-2005  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
The Nanni Investment Tust 10/10/2008  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
B& E Family, LLC  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Tom Sheehan  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Charles R. Bauer  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Charlotte Roehr  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Thomas M. O'Neill  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Dwain L. Owens & Jill A. Owens  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Paul A. Cohen  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Thomas Ryan & Mary Ann Cugini JTWRS  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Ruth A. Lorsung Revocable Trust Dtd. 2-17-2006  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
IRA Services Trust Company CFBO: Jay Oliphant IRA Account No. IRA544978  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Patsy and Michael Cluatre Joint Tennants  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Evan Kass SEP FBO Evan Kass  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Charles A. Lundby & Nancy M. Olsen  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Ryan E. Lawrence  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
The Rick & Christine Williams Family Trust  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Phil A. Albrecht Jr.  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Mark Lenhart  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
PENSCO Trust Company LLC Custodian FBO: Robert M. Sherba  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Matthew C. Johnson  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Joel A. Adkisson  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Richard Bacchiocchi IRA FBO IRA Services Trust Company Custodian  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Steven R. Batchelor  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Joseph Guidi  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Joe Don & Jennifer Joyce Irrevocable Trust  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Stephen M. Ford  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
The Elias E. Aupperle Trust  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Brevived, LLC  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Kenneth Harpell  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Scott Clark and Leslie Clark JTWRS  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Raymond D. Saenz III  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Diane Sutch  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Raymond Bills  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Thomas Liberis  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Arthur C. Hoover  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Lombardo Family Trust 11-08-2005  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Lorenz Finison & Carmen Fields JTWRS  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Gallagher Family Trust  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Paul Arema  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
IRA Services Trust Company CFBO Robin Tanner  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Savvy Capital, LLC  6,250   6,250   12,500   12,500   0 
Gary Metzger (1)  2,500   2,500   5,000   5,000   3,668,043 
Total  4,336,625   4,336,625   8,673,250   8,673,250   3,668,043 

(1) Gary Metzger is a director of the Ecoark Holdings and shall own 10.2% of Ecoark Holdings common stock before and after the sale of the shares registered for him in this registration statement.

15

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

The selling securityholders will determine at what price they may sell the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus, and such sales may be made at prevailing market prices, at prices related to the prevailing market price or at privately negotiated prices.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

hereof. We are registering (i) the shares of common stock issued pursuantunder no duty to the conversion of certain convertible promissory notes; and (ii) the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, in each case, issued in connection with the Private Offerings to permit the resaleupdate or revise any of these shares of common stock by the selling securityholders from time to timeforward-looking statements after the date of this prospectus. We willreport or to provide any assurance with respect to future performance or results. You are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not receive anyguarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and should read this report thoroughly with the understanding that the actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including, without limitation, unforeseen events beyond management’s control and assumptions that prove to be inaccurate or unfounded. The following list of examples, while not exclusive or exhaustive, includes some of the proceedsmany possible unforeseen developments that may cause actual results to differ from the sale by the selling securityholders of the shares of common stock. We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the shares of common stock.

The selling securityholders may sell allanticipated or a portion of the shares of common stock held by them and offered hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If the shares of common stock are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling securityholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions. The shares of common stock may be sold in one or more transactions at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions, pursuant to one or more of the following methods:desired results:

 

 on any national securities exchange or quotation service on which the securities may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;Overall economic and business conditions;
   
 Increased competition in the over-the-counter market;sustainability consumer and retail markets and the industries in which we compete;
   
 in transactions other than on these exchanges or systems orChanges in the over-the-counter market;economic, competitive, legal, and business conditions in local and regional markets and in the national and international marketplace;
   
 through the writing or settlementThe actions of options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;national, state and local legislative, regulatory, and judicial bodies and authorities;
   
 ordinary brokerage transactions and transactionsDelays or interruptions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;entering into contracts or acquiring necessary assets;
   
 block trades in which the broker-dealer will attemptThe necessity to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;expand or curtail operations, obtain additional capital, or change business strategy;
   
 purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
an exchange distributionChanges in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
privately negotiated transactions;
short sales effected after the date the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part is declared effective by the SEC;
broker-dealers may agree with a selling securityholder to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
a combination of any such methods of sale;technology; and,
   
 anyAny of the other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.factors discussed in this report, including those factors discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors”.

 

The selling securityholders may also sell shares of common stock under Rule 144 promulgated underYou should read this prospectus, including the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus. In addition,section titled “Risk Factors,” and the selling securityholders may transfer the shares of common stock by other means not describeddocuments that we reference elsewhere in this prospectus. If the selling securityholders effect such transactions by selling shares of common stock to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling securityholders or commissions from purchasers of the shares of common stock for whom they may actprospectus and have filed as agent or to whom they may sell as principal (which discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved but, except as set forth in a supplement to this prospectus to the extent required, in the case of an agency transaction, will not be in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 5110).

In connection with sales of the shares of common stock or otherwise, the selling securityholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn engage in short sales of the shares of common stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The selling securityholders may also sell shares of common stock short and deliver shares of common stock covered by this prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales. The selling securityholders may also loan or pledge shares of common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares.

16

The selling securityholders may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the warrants or shares of common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus or any amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act amending, if necessary, the list of selling securityholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling securityholders under this prospectus. The selling securityholders also may transfer and donate the shares of common stock in other circumstances as permitted by their respective Subscription Agreement, the warrants and all applicable law, in which case the transferees, donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.

To the extent required by the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, the selling securityholders and any broker-dealer participating in the distribution of the shares of common stock may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act. In such event, any commission paid, or any discounts or concessions allowed to, any such broker-dealer may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Selling securityholders who are deemed to be “underwriters” under the Securities Act (if any) will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act and may be subject to certain statutory liabilities of, including but not limited to, Sections 11, 12 and 17 of the Securities Act and Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act.

Each selling securityholder has informed us that it is not a registered broker-dealer and does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to engage in a distribution of the common stock. Upon us being notified in writing by a selling securityholder that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the distribution of common stock, a prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed, which will set forth the aggregate amount of shares of common stock being distributed and the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any broker-dealers or agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation from the selling securityholders and any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or re-allowed or paid to broker-dealers.

Under the securities laws of some states, the shares of common stock may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the shares of common stock may not be sold unless such shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

Each selling securityholder may sell all, some or none of the shares of common stock registered pursuantexhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus formsis a part. If sold underpart, completely and with the registration statementunderstanding that our actual results may differ materially from what we expect as expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of whichthe significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame, or at all.

These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus formsregardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of our common stock. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a part,result of new information, future events or otherwise after the sharesdate of common stock registered hereunder will be freely tradablethis prospectus. All subsequent forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the hands of persons other than our affiliates that acquire such shares.cautionary statements contained or referred to herein.

24

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

The selling securityholders and any other person participating in such distribution will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, to the extent applicable, Regulation M of the Exchange Act, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares of common stock by the selling securityholders and any other participating person. To the extent applicable, Regulation M may also restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the shares of common stock to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the shares of common stock and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock.

We will indemnify the selling shareholders against liabilities, including some liabilities under the Securities Act, in accordance with the applicable registration rights agreements to which they are a party, or the selling shareholders will be entitled to contribution. We may be indemnified by the selling shareholders against civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, that may arise from any written information furnished to us by the selling shareholder specifically for use in this prospectus, in accordance with the applicable registration rights agreement to which they are a party, or we may be entitled to contribution.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive proceeds from the sale of common stock underthe shares offered pursuant to this prospectus are solely for the accounts of the Selling Stockholders. Accordingly, we will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares offered by this prospectus. We will, however, receive approximately $21,683 from the selling securityholders if they exercise all of the warrants (assuming, in each case, no adjustments are made to the exercise price or number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants), which we expect we would use primarily for working capital purposes. The Company did receive $17,347 from the initial offering to the selling securityholders which it is using for general working capital purposes.

The holders of the warrants may exercise their warrants at any time at their own discretion, if at all, in accordance with the terms thereof until their expiration. As a result, we cannot plan on receiving any proceeds from the exercise of any of the warrants, nor can we plan on any specific uses of any proceeds we may receive beyond the purposes described herein. We have agreed to bear the expense (other than any underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions)Warrants if and when they are exercised in connection with the registration of the common stock being offered hereby by the selling securityholders.

17


MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock, from April 22, 2016, is quoted on the OTCQB market maintained by the OTC Market Group Inc. under the symbol “EARK”. We filed an application for our common stock to be listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market. Our common stock was quoted on the over the counter market from September 5, 2008 through February 5, 2010 under the symbol MBSV.OB. From February 6, 2010 to April 21, 2016, our common stock has been listed on the over the counter market under the symbol MGLT. Prior to February 8, 2010, there was no active market for our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low prices for our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the OTCQB. These prices have been retroactively adjusted for the reverse 1-for-250 stock split that occurred on March 18, 2016, in accordance with SAB Topic 4:C.

2016 HIGH  LOW 
First Quarter $25.025  $8.65 
Second Quarter $22.00  $12.00 
Third Quarter (through July 5, 2016) $18.00  $18.00 

2015 HIGH  LOW 
First Quarter $18.75  $6.25 
Second Quarter $

18.125

  $

7.50

 
Third Quarter $12.50  $3.75 
Fourth Quarter $17.50  $2.50 

FISCAL YEAR 2014 HIGH  LOW 
First Quarter $20.00  $6.75 
Second Quarter $17.125  $6.25 
Third Quarter $20.00  $7.875 
Fourth Quarter $18.75  $3.75 

Holders

As of July 5, 2016, the last reported sales price reported on the OTC Markets Inc. for our common stock was $18.00 per share. As of the date of this prospectus, we had approximately 625 holders of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is Island Stock Transfer, located at 15550 Roosevelt Boulevard, Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida 33760.cash.

 

DividendsDIVIDEND POLICY

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. The payment of dividends on our common stock in the future will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, operating and financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors may consider appropriate.  We currently expect to use all available funds to finance the future development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to support our operations and finance the growth and development of our business. Any future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other factors, our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects, the requirements of current or then-existing debt instruments and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

 

The followingcommon stock being offered by the selling shareholders are those issuable to the selling shareholders, upon exercise of the warrants. For additional information regarding the issuances of those warrants, please refer to the description of the private placement and the description warrants that were issued in that private placement. We are registering the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants in order to permit the selling shareholders to offer the shares for resale from time to time. Except for the ownership of the shares of common stock, preferred stock and the warrants as well as prior investment transactions with certain selling shareholders, the selling shareholders have not had any material relationship with us within the past three years.

The table sets forth equity compensation planbelow lists the selling shareholders and other information regarding the beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock by each of the selling shareholders. The second column lists the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each selling shareholder, based on its ownership of the warrants, as of December 31, 2015.July 2, 2020, assuming exercise of the warrants held by the selling shareholders on that date, without regard to any limitations exercises.

 

Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (a)  Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options (b)  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) 
          
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  659,000  $2.50   4,838,142 
Total     $     

The third column lists the shares of common stock being offered by this prospectus by the selling shareholders.

In accordance with the terms of a letter agreement with the selling shareholders, this prospectus generally covers the resale of the number of shares of common stock issuable to the selling shareholders upon exercise of the related warrants, as provided in the letter agreement, without regard to any limitations on the exercise of the warrants. The fourth column assumes the sale of all of the shares offered by the selling shareholders pursuant to this prospectus.

Under the terms of the warrants, a selling shareholder may not exercise the warrants to the extent such exercise would cause such selling shareholder, together with its affiliates and attribution parties, to beneficially own a number of shares of common stock which would exceed 4.99% of our then outstanding common stock following exercise, excluding for purposes of such determination shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants which have not been exercised. The number of shares in the second column does not reflect these limitations. The selling shareholders may sell all, some or none of their shares in this offering. See “Plan of Distribution.”

 

25

Name of Selling Stockholder Number of
shares of Common Stock
Owned Prior
to Offering(1)
  Maximum
Number of
shares of Common Stock to be Sold
Pursuant to
this
Prospectus
  Number of
shares of Common Stock
Owned After
Offering
 
Empery Asset Master, LTD (2)  1,147,059   1,147,059          - 
Empery Tax Efficient, LP (3)  223,530   223,530   - 
Empery Tax Efficient II, LP (4)  1,570,589   1,570,589   - 
Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd. (5)  1,470,590   1,470,590   - 
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. (6)  1,470,590   1,470,590   - 

(1)Number of shares of common stock owned prior to offering includes shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. The warrants owned by each of the selling shareholders have a beneficial ownership limitation such that the number of shares of common stock cannot exceed 4.99% of the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of Common Stock the exercise of any warrant. Each selling shareholder may, individually, increase or decrease the beneficial ownership limitation provisions, provided that the beneficial ownership limitation shall, in no event, exceed 9.99% of the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of any warrant.

(2)Empery Asset Management LP, the authorized agent of Empery Asset Master, LTD (“EAM”), has discretionary authority to vote and dispose of the shares held by EAM and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares. Martin Hoe and Ryan Lane, in their capacity as investment managers of Empery Asset Management LP, may also be deemed to have investment discretion and voting power over the shares held by EAM. EAM, Mr. Hoe and Mr. Lane each disclaim any beneficial ownership of these shares. The Company is registering 1,147,059 shares of the Company’s common stock underlying EAM’s warrants.

(3)Empery Asset Management LP, the authorized agent of Empery Tax Efficient, LP (“ETE”), has discretionary authority to vote and dispose of the shares held by ETE and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares. Martin Hoe and Ryan Lane, in their capacity as investment managers of Empery Asset Management LP, may also be deemed to have investment discretion and voting over the shares held by ETE. ETE, Mr. Hoe and Mr. Lane each disclaim any beneficial ownership of these shares. The Company is registering 223,530 shares of the Company’s common stock underlying ETE’s warrants.
 18
(4)Empery Asset Management LP, the authorized agent of Empery Tax Efficient II, LP (“ETE II”), has discretionary authority to vote and dispose of the shares held by ETE II and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares. Martin Hoe and Ryan Lane, in their capacity as investment managers of Empery Asset Management LP, may also be deemed to have investment discretion and voting over the shares held by ETE II. ETE II, Mr. Hoe and Mr. Lane each disclaim any beneficial ownership of these shares. The Company is registering 1,570,589 shares of the Company’s common stock underlying ETE II’s warrants.
 
(5)Sabby Management, LLC serves as the investment manager of Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd. (“SHMF”). Hal Mintz is the manager of Sabby Management, LLC and has voting and investment control of the securities held by SHMF. Each of Sabby Management, LLC and Hal Mintz disclaims beneficial ownership over the securities beneficially owned by SHMF except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interest therein. The Company is also registering 1,470,590 shares of the Company’s common stock underlying SHMF’s warrants.
(6)Sabby Management, LLC serves as the investment manager of Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. (“SVWMF”). Hal Mintz is the manager of Sabby Management, LLC and has voting and investment control of the securities held by SVWMF. Each of Sabby Management, LLC and Hal Mintz disclaims beneficial ownership over the securities beneficially owned by SVWMF except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interest therein. The Company is registering 1,470,590 shares of the Company’s common stock underlying SVWMF’s warrants.

26

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations describes the principal factors affecting the results of our operations, financial condition, and changes in financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited financial statements, and related notes thereto, included elsewhere in this prospectus.report. The information contained below may bein this discussion is subject to risk factors.a number of risks and uncertainties. We urge you to review carefully the sectionsections of this prospectusreport entitled “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” for a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with an investment in our securities. See “Special Note on Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

We sellDollar amounts and numbers of shares that follow in this report are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.

OVERVIEW

Ecoark Holdings is a diversified holding company incorporated in the state of Nevada on November 19, 2007. Ecoark Holdings has four wholly-owned subsidiaries: Ecoark, Inc. (“Ecoark”), a Delaware corporation which is the parent of Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs”), 440IoT Inc., a Nevada corporation (“440IoT”), Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”), and Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”).

Through its subsidiaries, the Company is engaged in three separate and distinct business segments: (i) technology; (ii) commodities; and (iii) financial.

Zest Labs offers the Zest Fresh solution, a breakthrough approach to quality management of fresh food, is specifically designed to help substantially reduce the $161 billion amount of food loss the U.S. experiences each year.
Banner Midstreamis engaged in oil and gas exploration, production and drilling operations on over 10,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Banner Midstream also provides transportation and logistics services and procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors.
Trend Holding’sprimary asset is Trend Discovery Capital Management. Trend Discovery Capital Management provides services and collects fees from entities. Trend Holdings invests in a select number of early stage startups each year as part of the fund’s Venture Capital strategy.
440IoT is a cloud and mobile software developer based near Boston, Massachusetts and is a software development and information solutions provider for cloud, mobile, and IoT (Internet of Things) applications.

On May 31, 2019, the Company a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”), pursuant to which the Trend Holdings merged with and into the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was consummated on the May 31, 2019.

Pursuant to the Merger, the Company acquired Trend Holding’s primary asset, Trend Discovery Capital Management, LLC (“Trend Capital Management”). Trend Capital Management provides services and products discussed undercollects fees from entities including Trend Discovery LP (“Trend LP”) and Trend Discovery SPV I (“Trend SPV”). Trend Discovery and Trend SPV invest in securities. Trend Capital Management does not invest in securities or have any role in the sectionpurchase of securities by Trend LP and Trend SPV.

In the near-term, Trend LP’s performance will be driven by its investment in Volans-i, a fully autonomous vertical takeoff and landing drone delivery platform (“Volans”). Trend LP currently owns approximately 1% of Volans and has participation rights to future financings to maintain its ownership at 1% indefinitely. More information can be found at flyvoly.com. Our principal executive offices are located at 5899 Preston Road #505, Frisco, Texas 75034, and our telephone number is (479) 259-2977. Our website address is http://ecoarkusa.com/. Our website and the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in and are not considered part of this prospectus entitled “Business.”  report.

On March 27, 2020, the Company and Banner Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Banner Parent”), entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Banner Purchase Agreement”) to acquire Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”). Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Banner Midstream has four operating subsidiaries: Pinnacle Frac Transport LLC (“Pinnacle Frac”), Capstone Equipment Leasing LLC (“Capstone”), White River Holdings Corp. (“White River”), and Shamrock Upstream Energy LLC (“Shamrock”). Pinnacle Frac provides transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations. Capstone procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors. These two operating subsidiaries of Banner Midstream are revenue producing entities.

White River and Shamrock are engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, and drilling operations on over 10,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Commitment on Secured Funding

The Company has secured a commitment for a $35 million long-term loan from an institutional lender to make additional investments in the energy sector. The supply-side shock from OPEC production increases coupled with the demand-side impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is continuing to drive oil prices to historic lows, resulting in unprecedented investment opportunities. This financing positions the Company to take advantage of these unique investment opportunities in the energy market. The loan commitment specifies a 20-year term and will carry a 6.25% interest rate. The agreement is pending final review and is not guaranteed to close.

27

Conversion of Credit Facility to Common Shares

The Company converted all principal and interest in the Trend SPV credit facility into shares of the Company’s common stock on March 31, 2020. The conversion of approximately $2,525 of principal and $290 of accrued interest resulted in the issuance of 3,855 shares of common stock at a value of $0.59 per share. This transaction resulted in a $541 gain upon conversion.

Increase in Authorized Common Shares

On March 31, 2020, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of common stock from 100 million to 200 million shares. The increase was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its annual meeting on February 27, 2020.

Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONSPrinciples of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ecoark Holdings and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “the Company”. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810Consolidation of the ASC to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—are consolidated except when control does not rest with the parent. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8, the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or the “SEC”). It is management’s opinion that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, management’s estimate of provisions required for uncollectible accounts receivable, fair value of assets held for sale and assets and liabilities acquired, impaired value of equipment and intangible assets, including goodwill, asset retirement obligations, estimates of discount rates in leases, liabilities to accrue, fair value of derivative liabilities associated with warrants, cost incurred in the satisfaction of performance obligations, permanent and temporary differences related to income taxes and determination of the fair value of stock awards. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The estimates of proved, probable and possible oil and gas reserves are used as significant inputs in determining the depletion of oil and gas properties and the impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proven, probable and possible reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. Similarly, evaluations for impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties are subject to numerous uncertainties including, among others, estimates of future recoverable reserves and commodity price outlooks. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions utilized.

Cash

Cash consists of cash, demand deposits and money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less. The Company holds no cash equivalents as of March 31, 2020. The Company occasionally maintains cash balances in excess of the FDIC insured limit. The Company does not consider this risk to be material.

Property and Equipment and Long-Lived Assets

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation on property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to ten years for all classes of property and equipment, except leasehold improvements which are depreciated over the term of the lease, which is shorter than the estimated useful life of the improvements.

ASC 360 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company has early adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2017-04Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment effective April 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

28

The Company reviews recoverability of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

ASC 360-10 addresses criteria to be considered for long-lived assets expected to be disposed of by sale. Six criteria are listed in ASC 360-10-45-9 that must be met in order for assets to be classified as held for sale. Once the criteria are met, long-lived assets classified as held for sale are to be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

These intangible assets are being amortized over estimated flows over the estimated useful lives of ten years for the customer relationships and on a straight-line basis over five years for the non-compete agreements. These intangible assets will be amortized commencing April 1, 2020. Any expenditures on intangible assets through the Company’s filing of patent and trademark protection for Company-owned inventions are expensed as incurred.

The Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

1.Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;

2.Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and

3.Significant negative industry or economic trends.

When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows.

Oil and Gas Properties

The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for its investment in oil and natural gas properties. Under the full cost method of accounting, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including directly related overhead costs are capitalized. General and administrative costs related to production and general overhead are expensed as incurred.

All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized on the unit of production method using estimates of proved reserves. Disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction of capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized unless such adjustment would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in operations. Unproved properties and development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the loss from operations before income taxes and the adjusted carrying amount of the unproved properties is amortized on the unit-of-production method.

Limitation on Capitalized Costs

Under the full-cost method of accounting, we are required, at the end of each reporting date, to perform a test to determine the limit on the book value of our oil and gas properties (the “Ceiling” test). If the capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties, net of accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, exceed the Ceiling, the excess or impairment is charged to expense. The expense may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher oil and gas prices may subsequently increase the Ceiling. The Ceiling is defined as the sum of: (a) the present value, discounted at 10% and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions, of (1) estimated future gross revenues from proved reserves, which is computed using oil and gas prices determined as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month hedging arrangements pursuant to SAB 103, less (2) estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves; plus, (b) the cost of properties being amortized; plus, (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized, net of (d) the related tax effects related to the difference between the book and tax basis of our oil and natural gas properties. A ceiling test was performed as of March 31, 2020 and there was no indication of impairment on the oil and gas properties.

Oil and Gas Reserves

Reserve engineering is a subjective process that is dependent upon the quality of available data and interpretation thereof, including evaluations and extrapolations of well flow rates and reservoir pressure. Estimates by different engineers often vary sometimes significantly. In addition, physical factors such as results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of an estimate, as well as economic factors such as changes in product prices, may justify revision of such estimates. Because proved reserves are required to be estimated using recent prices of the evaluation, estimated reserve quantities can be significantly impacted by changes in product prices.

29

Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation

Asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) primarily represent the estimated present value of the amount the Company will incur to plug, abandon and remediate its producing properties at the projected end of their productive lives, in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws. The Company determined its ARO by calculating the present value of the estimated cash flows related to the obligation. The retirement obligation is recorded as a liability at its estimated present value as of the obligation’s inception, with an offsetting increase to proved properties.

Software Costs

 

ResultsThe Company accounts for software development costs in accordance with ASC 985-730Software Research and Development, and ASC 985-20Costs of OperationsSoftware to be Sold, Leased or Marketed. ASC 985-20 requires that costs related to the development of the Company’s products be capitalized as an asset when incurred subsequent to the point at which technological feasibility of the enhancement is established and prior to when a product is available for general release to customers. ASC 985-20 specifies that technological feasibility can be established by the completion of a detailed program design. Costs incurred prior to achieving technological feasibility are expensed. The Company does utilize detailed program designs; however, the Company’s products are released soon after technological feasibility has been established and as a result software development costs have been expensed as incurred.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These costs include internal salaries and related costs and professional fees for activities related to development. These costs relate to the Zest Data Services platform, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent events were evaluated through the date the consolidated financial statements were filed.

Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which the Company early adopted effective April 1, 2017. No cumulative adjustment to accumulated deficit was required as a result of this adoption, and the early adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements as no material arrangements prior to the adoption were impacted under the new pronouncement.

The Company accounts for a contract when it has been approved and committed to, each party’s rights regarding the goods or services to be transferred have been identified, the payment terms have been identified, the contract has commercial substance, and collectability is probable. Revenue is generally recognized net of allowances for returns and any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities. Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the fair value for each of the elements.

Revenue from software license agreements of Zest Labs is recognized over time or at a point in time depending on the evaluation of when the customer obtains control of the promised goods or services over the term of the agreement. For agreements where the software requires continuous updates to provide the intended functionality, revenue is recognized over the term of the agreement. For Software as a Service (“SaaS”) contracts that include multiple performance obligations, including hardware, perpetual software licenses, subscriptions, term licenses, maintenance and other services, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on estimates of the price that would be charged to the customer for each promised product or service if it were sold on a standalone basis. For contracts for new products and services where standalone pricing has not been established, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on estimates using the adjusted market assessment approach, the expected cost plus a margin approach or the residual approach as appropriate under the circumstances. Contracts are typically on thirty-day payment terms from when the Company satisfies the performance obligation in the contract.

Revenue under master service agreements is recorded upon the performance obligation being satisfied. Typically, the satisfaction of the performance obligation occurs upon the frac sand load being delivered to the customer site and this load being successfully invoiced and accepted by the Company’s factoring agent.

The Company accounts for contract costs in accordance with ASC Topic 340-40,Contracts with Customers. The Company recognizes the cost of sales of a contract as expense when incurred or at the time a performance obligation is satisfied. The Company recognizes an asset from the costs to fulfill a contract only if the costs relate directly to a contract, the costs generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying a performance obligation in the future and the costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are capitalized unless the costs would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract was obtained.

Cost of sales for Pinnacle Frac includes all direct expenses incurred to produce the revenue for the Three Months Endedperiod. This includes, but is not limited to, direct employee labor, direct contract labor and fuel.

30

Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company considers accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, to be fully collectible. The allowance is based on management’s estimate of the overall collectability of accounts receivable, considering historical losses, credit insurance and economic conditions. Based on these same factors, individual accounts are charged off against the allowance when management determines those individual accounts are uncollectible. Credit extended to customers is generally uncollateralized, however credit insurance is obtained for some customers. Past-due status is based on contractual terms.

For Pinnacle Frac, accounts receivable is comprised of unsecured amounts due from customers that have been conveyed to a factoring agent without recourse. Pinnacle Frac receives an advance from the factoring agent of 98% of the amount invoiced to the customer within one business day. The Company recognizes revenue for 100% of the gross amount invoiced, records an expense for the 2% finance charge by the factoring agent, and realizes cash for the 98% net proceeds received.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company follows ASC 740-10Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This requires recognition and measurement of uncertain income tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” approach. Management evaluates their tax positions on an annual basis.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction and various state tax jurisdictions. The federal and state income tax returns of the Company are subject to examination by the IRS and state taxing authorities, generally for three years after they were filed.

Vacation and Paid-Time-Off Compensation

The Company follows ASC 710-10Compensation – General. The Company records liabilities and expense when obligations are attributable to services already rendered, will be paid even if an employee is terminated, payment is probable, and the amount can be estimated.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company follows ASC 718 Compensation – Stock Compensation and has early adopted ASU 2017-09Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting as of July 1, 2017. The Company calculates compensation expense for all awards granted, but not yet vested, based on the grant-date fair values. Share-based compensation expense for all awards granted is based on the grant-date fair values. The Company recognizes these compensation costs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, on a pro rata basis over the requisite service period of each vesting tranche of each award. The Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as trends of actual option forfeitures when estimating the forfeiture rate.

The Company facilitates payment of the employee tax withholdings resulting from the issuances of these awards by remitting the employee taxes and recovering the resulting amounts due from the employee either via payments from employees or from the sale of shares issued sufficient to cover the amounts due the Company.

The Company measured compensation expense for its non-employee share-based compensation under ASC 505-50Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employeesthrough March 31, 2019. The fair value of the options and shares issued is used to measure the transactions, as this is more reliable than the fair value of the services received. The fair value is measured at the value of the Company’s common stock on the date that the commitment for performance by the counterparty has been reached or the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to expense, or to a prepaid expense if shares of common stock are issued in advance of services being rendered, and additional paid-in capital.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-09Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting effective April 1, 2017. Cash paid when shares were directly withheld for tax withholding purposes is classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. There were no other impacts from this adoption.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU is intended to simplify aspects of share-based compensation issued to non-employees by making the guidance consistent with accounting for employee share-based compensation. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2018-07 effective April 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 825Financial Instruments requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments: The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and amounts payable to related parties, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s debt instruments also approximates fair value.

Leases

The Company followed ASC 840Leasesin accounting for leased properties through March 31, 2019. Effective April 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842Leases.

31

Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) include additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as convertible notes, preferred stock, stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants. Common stock equivalents are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reports a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for periods presented, so only basic weighted average number of common shares are used in the computations.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Management evaluates all of the Company’s financial instruments, including warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. The Company generally uses a Black-Scholes model, as applicable, to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates when needed. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is remeasured at the end of each reporting period. The Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of the derivative liabilities.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

Related-Party Transactions

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal stockholders of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal stockholders of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal where one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all material related-party transactions. All transactions shall be recorded at fair value of the goods or services exchanged.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 and 2015later updated with ASU 2019-01 in March 2019Leases (Topic 842).The ASU’s change the accounting for leased assets, principally by requiring balance sheet recognition of assets under lease arrangements. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. On adoption, the Company recognized additional operating liabilities of approximately $99, with corresponding right of use assets of $99 based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under leasing standards for existing operating leases.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU is intended to simplify aspects of share-based compensation issued to non-employees by making the guidance consistent accounting for employee share-based compensation. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2018-07 effective April 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

There were updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Segment Information

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10Segment Reporting.This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which management disaggregates the Company in making internal operating decisions. The Company and its Chief Operating Decision Makers determined that the Company’s operations effective with the May 31, 2019, acquisition of Trend Holdings and the March 27, 2020 acquisition of Banner Midstream now consist of three segments, Trend Holdings (Finance), Banner Midstream (Commodities) and Zest Labs (Technology).

32

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019

As the Company acquired Trend Holdings and Banner Midstream during the year ended March 31, 2020 and sold Pioneer, Sable and Magnolia, the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 periods are not comparable. Accordingly, many of the variances between operating revenues and operating expenditures are the result of these acquisitions and disposals.

 

Revenues

Revenues for the three monthsfiscal year ended March 31, 20162020 were $1,964$581 as compared to $2,225$1,062 for the three monthsfiscal year ended March 31, 2015. The 12% decrease was principally due to lower shipments2019. Revenues were comprised of recycled plastic trash cans by Pioneer Products, offset by sales of a new product, office chairs$175 and a small increase in service revenues. The lower shipments of plastic products were principally due to a difference$0 in the timingfinancing segment; $173 and $1,062 in the technology segment; and $233 and $0 in the commodity segment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Revenues of shipments at year-end 2015 versus 2014. Sales$1,000 for 2019 were from a project with Walmart related to freshness solutions. The acquisitions of Trend Discovery and Banner Midstream generated segment reporting in the office chairs introduced in 2016 partially offset the decrease in sales of plastic products. Revenue from services of $757 in 2016 increased 2% from $742 achieved in 2015. Expansion of the 3D mapping, modeling and consulting business along with certain commission income drove the increase in service revenues.year ended March 31, 2020.

 

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

 

Cost of revenues for the quarterfiscal year ended March 31, 20162020 was $1,459$259 as compared to $1,641$699 for the quarterfiscal year ended March 31, 2015. The decrease was directly related2019. Cost of Revenues were comprised of $0 and $0 in the financing segment; $165 and $699 in the technology segment; and $94 and $0 in the commodity segment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Gross margins increased from 34% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 to 55% for the decrease in revenues. The decrease in gross profit from $584 in 2015 to $505 in 2016 was principally a result of lower margins on service revenues as Eco3D expanded its mix of projects, some of which were executed at lower margins. Services achieved a gross margin of 70% in 2015 and 63% in 2016, with the decrease partlyfiscal year ended March 31, 2020 due to lower costs involved with executing the mix of new projects. Total gross margin for the Company was steady at 26% in both 2016 and 2015. Margins for products decreased from 5% in 2015 to 2% in 2016 due to costs incurred for the introduction of the new products.

 

Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 were $10,129 as compared to $14,511 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. Operating expenses were comprised of $729 and $0 in the financing segment; $9,330 and $14,511 in the technology segment; and $70 and $0 in the commodity segment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Pioneer Products operational activities described above required relatively limited home office support. Therefore, most$4,382 decrease, or approximately 30%, was due principally to changes in operations for Zest Labs in their selling expenses as well as reductions in depreciation, amortization and impairment expenses as many of the operating expenses below were allocated to the services segment. The services segment includes activities relating to Intelleflex for which the Company has invested considerable resources for support and funding.intangible assets had been impaired in 2019.

 

Salaries and Salary Related Costs

 

Salaries and related costs for 2016the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 were $1,020, up 26%$3,668, decreasing $1,180 from $812$4,848 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in 2015. The increaseshare-based compensation that did not require cash payments. A portion of that cost was related toderived from estimates of stock option expense calculated using a numberBlack-Scholes model which can vary based on assumptions utilized and share-based compensation expense from awards of individuals who became employees comparedstock grants. Additional information on that equity expense can be found in the consolidated financial statements, which complies with previous contractor status and the expansion of staff at each operation.critical accounting policies driven by ASC 718-10.

 

Professional Fees and Consulting

 

Professional fees and consulting expenses for 2016the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 of $267 were down 64%$2,333, increased $1,018, or 43%, from $750$1,315 incurred for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The increase in 2015 as aprofessional fees was the result of increases in share-based compensation and consulting expenses due to the conversionreliance of contractors toconsultants rather than employees and a decreaseduring the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.

Share-based non-cash compensation of $1,692 in consulting expense. The reductionthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 increased $1,287 from $405 recorded in consultingthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. Additional information on that equity expense was achieved despite a number of costs incurred associatedcan be found in the consolidated financial statements, which complies with the Company becoming a public entity in 2016.critical accounting policies driven by ASC 505-50.

 

Selling, General and Administrative

 

OtherSelling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 were $1,370 compared with $1,671 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. Cost reduction initiatives were focused on salary related and professional fees costs. Spending in 2016other areas included sales and business development efforts were $517 down from $590 in 2015, partially due to lower marketing expenditures.not reduced.

 

Depreciation, Amortization and AmortizationImpairment

 

Depreciation, amortization and amortization expenseimpairment expenses for 2016 was $75,the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 were $286 compared to $416$3,357 for 2015.the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. Depreciation, amortization and impairment expenses were comprised of $0 and $0 in the financing segment; $282 and $3,357 in the technology segment; and $4 and $0 in the commodity segment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The 82%$3,071 decrease resulted primarily from certain customer list intangibles becoming fully amortizedimpairment of long-lived tangible and intangible assets related to Zest Labs following loss of the expected contract from Walmart offset by charges related to the acquisition of Banner Midstream. We anticipate large increases in September 2015.the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021 in depreciation due to this acquisition as opposed to having only 4 days’ worth of expenses in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses were down slightly from $777expense decreased 26% to $2,472 in 2015 to $752the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 compared with $3,320 in 2016.the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The majority of these expenses$848 reduction in costs related primarily to the ZEST initiatives at Intelleflex.maturing of development of the Zest Labs freshness solutions.

19

33

 

Interest and Other Expense

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 was a loss of ($369) as compared to income of $3,160 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The $3,529 decrease was a result of the volatility in the stock price in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. In addition, there was a loss in 2020 from the extinguishment of the derivative liabilities that when converted to shares of common stock of $2,099.

 

Interest expense, net of interest income, for 2016the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 was $95$422 as compared to $206$417 for 2015.the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The 54% decreaseincrease was a result of lower interest accruingincurred on a $10,000 credit facility established in December 2018 offset by the related partyinterest for 4 days in the debt assumed in 2016 becausethe Banner acquisition. We anticipate for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021 interest expense to be higher than the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 as a result of a decrease in interest ratesthis acquisition and lower outstanding balances.the assumed debt.

 

Net Loss

 

Net loss for 2016the year ended March 31, 2020 was $2,221$12,137 as compared to $2,967 in 2015.$13,650 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The $746$1,513 decrease in net loss was primarily due to athe decrease in total operating expenses described above offset the change in the fair value of $714derivative liabilities. As described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward for income tax purposes totaling approximately 109,794 at March 31, 2020 that can be utilized to reduce future income taxes. A valuation allowance has been estimated such that no deferred tax assets have been recognized in the financial statements. The net loss was comprised of $554 and a decrease$0 in the financing segment; $11,637 and $13,650 in the technology segment; and net interest expenseincome of $111, offset by a decrease of $79$52 and $0 in gross profit.the commodity segment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2014Results of Discontinued Operations

 

Magnolia Solar Results of Operations

Our revenues are derived from research and development grants and contracts awarded to the company by government and private sector.

Revenues

Currently we are in an early stage in our development and have recorded $160 of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $218 of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 a decrease of $58 or 26.8%. We anticipate emerging from the development stage in fiscal 2017. The revenue recorded is from research and development grants or contracts to develop solar cells using Magnolia’s technology.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $102 as compared to $135 for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $33 or 24.6%. Cost of revenues was comprised of direct labor, direct travel, materials, and subcontractors for the solar cell development. The decrease in cost of revenues for this period was attributable to reductions in direct labor due to work on some contracts being completed.

Operating Expenses

Indirect and Administrative Labor

Indirect and administrative labor expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $160 as compared to $199 for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $39 or 19.3%. Indirect labor and benefits were comprised of wages for the administrative staff, payroll taxes, health insurance, disability insurance, indirect travel, other administrative expenses, provision for vacation time, and stock compensation expense. The decrease in indirect and administrative expenses for this period was primarily attributable to a decrease in indirect labor, benefits and travel costs.

Professional Fees

Professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $150 as compared to $138 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $12 or 8.6%. Professional fees were comprised of accounting, business services, public relations, audit, and legal fees. The increase in professional fees for this period was attributable primarily to an increase in legal counsel costs incurred with the Ecoark transaction.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $36 as compared to $36 for the year ended December 31, 2014, representing no increase or decrease. Depreciation and amortization expense was comprised of amortization of the license fee paid for the technology license, amortization of the debt issue, and depreciation on the property and equipment.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $37 as compared to $44 for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $7 or 14.9%. General and administrative expense was comprised of expenses for office lease, computer, office supplies, dues and subscriptions, worker’s compensation, disability insurance, printing, telephone, business meals, repairs and maintenance, public relations, advertising, state taxes, business gifts and other miscellaneous items. The decrease in general and administrative expense for this period was attributable to general costs cuts, offset by bad debts expenses incurred. 

20

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $240 as compared to $240 for the year ended December 31, 2014. Interest expense was comprised of interest incurred on outstanding long-term debt.

Net Loss

As a result of the aforesaid, our net loss was $566 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to a loss of $574 for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $8 or 1.4%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations, and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. Significant factors in the management of liquidity are funds generated by operations, levels of accounts receivable and accounts payable and capital expenditures.

To date we have financed our operations through government grants, the sale of our common stock and the issuance of debt.

At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 we had cash of $46 and $25, respectively, and working capital deficit of $3,026 and $2,767, respectively. The decrease in working capital was due to decrease in accounts receivable and an increase in accrued expenses. The opinion of our independent registered public accounting firm on our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 contains an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon raising capital from financing transactions.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $21 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $93 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was attributable to a decrease in accounts receivable and an increase in accounts payable.

There were no investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. There was no cash used in investing activities because we did not add to plant and equipment.

There were no financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. There were no capital raising transactions during the reporting period.

Since our inception, we have experienced negative cash flow from operations and expect to experience significant negative cash flow from operations in the future. In addition, we have $2,400 of original issue discount senior secured convertible notes that originally matured on December 31, 2014. On January 29, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with holders of the notes to extend the maturity to June 30, 2016. Also on January 29, 2016, we entered into a Merger Agreement with Ecoark providing, among other things, for the acquisition of Ecoark by the Company in a share for share exchange pursuant to which it is contemplated that, immediately following the closing, Ecoark shareholders owned approximately 95% of the outstanding shares of the Company. The Company filed a 14A Proxy Statement to hold a shareholder meeting to vote on certain proposals to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase of the authorized shares of common stock to 100,000,000 shares, to effect the creation of 5,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock, to approve a reverse stock split of the common stock 1 for 250, and to change the name of the corporation to “Ecoark Holdings Inc.” After receiving the approval of the Company’s shareholders, the Merger was completed in March 2016. Under the January 29, 2016 agreement with their holders, the notes were converted to equity after the Merger was completed.

We will need to raise additional funds in the future so that we can expand our operations and repay our indebtedness due under the original issue senior secured notes. Therefore our continuation as a going concern is dependent on our ability to obtain necessary equity funding to continue operations.  Financing transactions may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, government grants or other financing mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and a downturn in the U.S. equity and debt markets could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Furthermore, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. The inability to obtain additional capital may restrict our ability to grow and may reduce our ability to continue to conduct business operations. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may have to curtail our development plans and possibly cease our operations altogether. 

21

The following management’s discussion and analysis addresses the financial condition and results of operations of Ecoark, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Consistent with the financial statements included in Section F below, no amounts relating to Magnolia Solar are included.

Ecoark Results of Continuing Operations

Revenues

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $7,868 as compared to $6,017 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The 31% increase was related to expanded operations, including a significant increase in service revenues and product sales. Product sales of $5,167 in 2015 increased 18% from the $4,378 achieved in 2014. The increase was principally due to increased sales of Pioneer Products’ plastic products manufactured from recycled and other material. Revenue from services of $2,701 in 2015 increased 65% from the $1,639 recorded in 2014. Expansion of the 3D mapping, modeling and consulting business drove the increase in service revenues as Eco3D increased the number of employees and projects completed for customers.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $6,138 as compared to $5,024 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was directly related to the increase in revenues. The improvement in gross profit from $993 in 2014 to $1,730 was principally achieved as a result of higher margin service revenues. Services achieved a gross margin of 56% in both 2015 and 2014. The increase in those revenues resulted in an increase in total gross margin from 17% in 2014 to 22% in 2015. Margins for products were 4% or less.

Operating Expenses

The Pioneer Products operational activities described above required relatively limited home office support. Therefore, most of the operating expenses below were allocated to the services segment. The services segment includes activities relating to Intelleflex for which the Company has invested considerable resources for support and funding.

Salaries and Salary Related Costs

Salaries for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $3,791, up 34% from $2,836 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was related to the expanded operations referred to above regarding the increase in sales and an increase in stock based compensation. In addition, a number of individuals became employees compared with previous contractor status.

Professional Fees and Consulting

Professional fees and consulting expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 of $3,651, were down 31% from $5,311 incurred for the year ended December 31, 2014 as a result of the conversion of contractors to employees and a decrease in consulting expense.

General and Administrative

Other general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $1,636 in line with $1,630 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $1,226, compared to $1,708 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The 28% decrease resulted from certain customer list intangibles relating to Pioneer Products becoming fully amortized in September 2015 while 2014 included a full year of amortization.

Interest Expense

Interest expense, net of interest income, for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $785 as compared to $1,270 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The 38% decrease was a result of lower interest accruing on the related party debt in 2015 because of a decrease in interest rates.

Net Loss

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $10,473 as compared to $14,264 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The $3,791 decrease in net loss was primarily from an increase of $737 in gross profit, a decrease in total operating expenses of $1,120, a decrease in interest expense of $485 and the $1,449 loss from discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 was $2,300, an improvement from the loss of $4,181 incurred in 2014 that did not exist in 2015.

22

In November 2014, Ecoark sold its subsidiary, SA Concepts. In the sale, Ecoark sold the net assets in exchange for 2,000,000 Class A shares of stock. The value of the treasury stock in this transaction of $616 was equal to the value of the net assets of SA Concepts sold. Therefore, there was no gain or loss attributable to the disposal of this subsidiary. The operations of SA Concepts are reflected as lossfiscal year ended March 31, 2018. Revenues from discontinued operations were $9,883 up slightly from $9,541 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. Sable increased revenues by 20% due to a 10% increase in shipments and achieving higher selling prices per pound. Pioneer had a 30% decrease in sales due to a 23% decrease in shipments and a lower price per unit. The discontinued operations as of March 31, 2020 relates to a segment of the consolidated statements of operations.Banner Midstream business, Pinnacle Vac which had nominal activity in 2020.

 

Liquidity and Capital ResourcesLIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations, and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. Significant factors in the management of liquidity are funds generated by operations, levels of accounts receivable and accounts payable and capital expenditures.

 

To date we have financed our operations through sales of common stock and the issuance of debt. Significant capital raising during the year consisted of the following:

(a)On August 21, 2019, the Company and two accredited investors entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the investors an aggregate of 2 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share at a price of $1,000 per share. Each share of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $1,000 and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $0.51, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

On October 15, 2019, nearly all the Series B Preferred Stock shares were converted into 3,761 shares of Common Stock.

On January 26, 2020, the Company entered into letter agreements (the “Letter Agreements”) with accredited institutional investors (the “Investors”) holding the warrants issued with the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock on August 21, 2019 (the “Warrants”). Pursuant to the Letter Agreements, the Investors agreed to a cash exercise of the Warrants at a price of $0.51. The Company additionally, granted 5,882 warrants at $0.90. On January 27, 2020, the Company received approximately $2,000 in cash from the exercise of the August 2019 warrants and issued the January 2020 warrants to the investors, which have an exercise price of $0.90 and may be exercised within five years of issuance.

(b)On October 28, 2019, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement with investors (the “Investors”) that are the holders of warrants issued in the Company’s purchase agreements entered into on (i) March 17, 2017 (the “March Purchase Agreement” and such warrants, the “March Warrants”) and (ii) May 26, 2017 (the “May Purchase Agreement” and such warrants, the “May Warrants”. The March Warrants and the May Warrants (collectively, the “Existing Securities”) were amended to, among other amendments, reduce the exercise price of the Existing Securities to $0.51.

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Exchange Agreement and in reliance on Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the Company issued 2,243 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Investors in exchange for the 2,875 of the Existing Securities. Upon the issuance of the 2,243 shares, the 2,875 Existing Securities were extinguished.

34

(c)On November 11, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), the Company and two institutional accredited investors (each an “Investor” and, collectively, the “Investors”) entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the Investors an aggregate of 1,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), at a price of $1,000 per share (the “Private Placement”).

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to each Investor a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock purchased by the Investor. Each Warrant has an exercise price equal to $0.73, subject to full ratchet price only anti-dilution provisions in accordance with the terms of the Warrants (the “Exercise Price”) and is exercisable for five years after the Effective Date. In addition, if the market price of the Common Stock for the five trading days prior to July 22, 2020 is less than $0.73, holder of the warrants shall be entitled to receive additional shares of common stock based on the number of shares of common stock that would have been issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock had the initial conversion price been equal to the market price at such time (but not less than $0.25) less the number of shares of common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock based on the $0.73 conversion price.

Each share of the Series C Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $1,000 (the “Stated Value”) and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $0.73, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

In addition to these transactions, the Company in the period April 1, 2020 through June 25, 2020, entered into the following transactions:

(a)On April 16, 2020, the Company received $386 in Payroll Protection Program funding related to Ecoark Holdings, and the Company also received on April 13, 2020, $1,482 in Payroll Protection Program funds for Pinnacle Frac LLC, a subsidiary of Banner Midstream.
(b)On May 1, 2020, an institutional investor elected to convert its remaining shares of Series B Preferred shares into 161 common shares.

(c)On April 1 and May 5, 2020, two institutional investors elected to convert their 1 Series C Preferred share into 1,379 common shares.

(d)On May 10, 2020, the Company received approximately $6,294 from accredited institutional investors holding 1,379 warrants issued on November 13, 2019 with an exercise price of $0.73 and holding 5,882 warrants with an exercise price of $0.90. The Company agreed to issue to these investors an additional number of warrants as a condition of their agreement to exercise the November 2019 warrants.

 

At DecemberMarch 31, 20152020 and December 31, 20142019 we had cash (including restricted cash) of $1,962$406 and $2,220,$244, respectively, and a working capital deficit of $2,153$16,689 and $6,636,$5,045 as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The increase in the working capital was principally due todeficit is the decreaseresult of the liabilities assumed in the current portion of long-term debt-related parties resulting from the conversion of debt to equity. EcoarkBanner Midstream acquisition. The Company is dependent upon raising additional capital from future financing transactions.transactions and had raised approximately $6,294 in a warrant exercise in the first quarter of fiscal 2021. The revenue generating operations of Banner Midstream will continue to improve the liquidity of the Company moving forward. The COVID-19 pandemic has had minimal impact on our operations to date, but the effect of this pandemic on the capital markets may affect some of our operations. The Company was successful in the repayment of a large portion of the debt assumed in the Banner Midstream acquisition in the first fiscal quarter of 2021.

 

Net cash used byin operating activities was $7,671$5,490 for the fiscal year ended DecemberMarch 31, 2015,2020, as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $8,012$9,040 for the fiscal year ended DecemberMarch 31, 2014.2019. Cash used in operating activities is related to Ecoark’sthe Company’s net loss partially offset by non-cash expenses.expenses, including share-based compensation and depreciation, amortization and impairments. The decrease in operating cash burn was impacted favorably by collections of receivables and lower cash used by discontinued operations as a result of concerted efforts to improve those operations prior to sale.

Net cash used in investing activities was $775 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020, as compared to $536 net cash provided for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. Net cash provided by investing activities in 2019 related to proceeds from the sale of Sable assets and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 related to the proceeds from the sale of Magnolia. Both the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 uses are related to purchases of property and equipment. In addition, the Company loaned $1,000 to Banner Midstream prior to the acquisition, which is now reflected as an intercompany advance and is eliminated in consolidation as of March 31, 2020.

 

Net cash provided inby financing activities in 2015for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 was $7,388, including $8,461 from the$6,427 that included $2,980 (net of fees) raised via issuance of commonpreferred stock less netand warrants, $2,000 raised in the exchange of warrants, $1,137 provided through the credit facility, $403 raised from proceeds from notes payable from related parties offset by a $75 repayment, and $18 of repayments of long-term debt and amounts due prior owners. This compared with 2019 amounts of $1,073. In 2014, $5,143 was received from$5,018 provided by financing that included $4,221 (net of fees) raised via issuance of stock, $1,350 provided through the salecredit facility, offset by a $500 repayment of common stockdebt and $5,034 from net issuancespurchases of long-term debt. treasury shares of $53.

 

Since our inception, Ecoark has experienced negative cash flow from operationsOther commitments and expectscontingencies are disclosed in Note 12 to experience significant negative cash flow from operations in the future. It will need to raise additional funds in the future so that it can expand its operations and repay its indebtedness. The inability to obtain additional capital may restrict its ability to grow and may reduce its ability to continue to conduct business operations.

At December 31, 2015 maturities of Ecoark’s long-term debt-related parties and long-term debt of $4,504 are due in 2016 and thus are included in current liabilities.

From March 28, 2016 to April 28, 2016, we sold 4,336,625 shares to 214 accredited investors through the Private Offering, which raised a total of $17,347 which it is using to retire debt, make capital investments and for general working capital purposes.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2015, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

For information regarding the impact of recently issued accounting standards, see Note 1 to ourconsolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, included in this prospectus.statements.

 

23

35

 

BUSINESS

 

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.

 

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (“Ecoark Holdings”) is a Nevada corporation incorporated on November 19, 2007. Ecoark Holdings is an innovative emerging growthAgTech company focused on the developmentsolutions that reduce food waste and deploymentimprove delivered freshness and product margins for fresh and perishable foods for a wide range of business solutionsorganizations including growers, processors, distributors and products to the retail, agriculture, food service, commercial real estate and architecture, engineering and construction end markets.retailers. Ecoark Holdings has assembled a team and portfolio of proprietary, patented technologies to address the waste in operations, logistics and supply chain. Ecoark Holdings accomplishesaddresses this through twoits indirect wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Ecoark,subsidiary: Zest Labs, Inc. (“Ecoark”Zest Labs” or “Zest”). The Company committed to a plan to focus its business on Zest Labs and divested non-core assets in 2019 that included assets of Pioneer Products, LLC (“Pioneer Products” or “Pioneer”) and Magnolia Solar, Inc. (“Magnolia Solar”). Further, EcoarkThose assets are reported as held for sale and their operations are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The subsidiary Eco3d, LLC (“Eco3d”) was sold on April 14, 2017 and is also reported as held for sale and discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. All discontinued operations have been sold or ceased operations by December 31, 2019, so there are no remaining assets or liabilities of the discontinued operations. The Company has three operating entities: Intelleflex, Eco3D and Pioneer Products.13 employees of continuing operations as of the date of this filing.

 

Our principal executive officesOn September 26, 2017, the Company announced that its Board of Directors unanimously approved a new corporate strategy. The Company has transitioned from a diversified holding company into a company focused on its Zest Labs asset. The Company has divested all non-core holdings. In May 2018, the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell key assets of Pioneer (including the assets of Sable) and Magnolia Solar. The sales were completed in 2019. Relevant assets and liabilities are located at 3333 Pinnacle Hills Parkway, Suite 220, Rogers, Arkansas 72758,classified as held for sale and our telephone number is (479) 259-2979. Our website address is http://ecoarkusa.com/. Our websiteoperations are classified as discontinued in the consolidated financial statements. The Company will be focusing on three separate areas: the primary focus will continue to be the commercialization of the Zest Fresh solution across the country and abroad. The next area will be on licensing, partnerships, or joint ventures to apply a branding of the information contained on,Zest Fresh certification to various perishable consumer goods and products. The final area will be to identify any bolt-on technologies or operations that can be accessed through, our website will not be deemedacquired to be incorporated by reference in,open up new sales and are not considered part of, this prospectus. You should not rely on any such information in making your decision to purchase our common stock.distribution channels for the Zest solution.

 

On DecemberMay 31, 2009, Ecoark Holdings, originally known as Mobilis Relocation Services, Inc. (“Mobilis”), entered into an Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization with Magnolia Solar, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corp. Upon closing of2019, the transaction, under the Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization, Magnolia Solar, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mobilis. Thereafter, Mobilis changed its name to Magnolia Solar Corporation. The name was later changed to Ecoark Holdings, Inc. as described below.

Acquisition of Ecoark, Inc.

Prior to the acquisition of Ecoark, Ecoark Holdings’ operations were through Magnolia Solar which operations are described below.

On January 29, 2016, Ecoark HoldingsCompany entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Ecoark. PursuantTrend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) for the Company to acquire 100% of Trend Holdings pursuant to a merger of Trend Holdings with and into the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed on the May 31, 2019 and as agreed in the Merger Agreement, Ecoark merged with and into a subsidiary of Ecoark Holdings (the “Merger”). Ecoark and Magnolia Solar, Inc. continue as the subsidiaries and businesses of Ecoark Holdings.

Prior toCompany is the completion of the Merger on March 24, 2016,surviving entity in a special shareholder meeting on March 18, 2016, the following actions to amend the Articles of Incorporation were undertaken by Ecoark Holdings to:

1.effect a change in the name of our company from Magnolia Solar Corporation to Ecoark Holdings Inc.;

2.effect a reverse stock split of our common stock by a ratio of one-for-two hundred fifty shares (1 for 250);

3.effect an increase in the number of our authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to 100,000,000; and

4.effect the creation of 5,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock.

After giving effect to the Merger and the issuanceseparate corporate existence of common stockTrend Holdings has ceased to the shareholders of Ecoark, the shareholders of Ecoark received 95.34% of the shares of Ecoark Holding’s common stock (27,696,066 shares out of 29,047,062 shares).

24

Business Modelexist.

 

EcoarkTrend Holding’s primary asset is Trend Discovery Capital Management. Trend Discovery Capital Management provides services and collects fees from entities including Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I. Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I invest in securities. Neither Trend Holdings nor Trend Discovery Capital Management invest in securities or have any role in the purchase of securities by Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I. In the near-term, Trend Discovery LP’s performance will be driven by its investment in Volans-i, a fully autonomous vertical takeoff and landing (“VTOL”) drone delivery platform. Trend Discovery LP currently owns approximately 1% of Volans-i and has participation rights to future financings to maintain its ownership at 1% indefinitely. More information can be found at flyvoly.com.

 

Ecoark Holdings operates through four subsidiaries:Description of Business

 

Intelleflex®Zest Labs

 

Intelleflex's ZEST Data ServicesZest Labs offers freshness management solutions for fresh food growers, suppliers, processors, distributors, grocers and restaurants. Its Zest Fresh solution is a secure, multi-tenant cloud-based data collection platform for aggregatingpost-harvest shelf-life and real-time permission-based sharing and analysis of information. ZEST Fresh, a fresh foodfreshness management solution that utilizesimproves delivered freshness of produce and protein and reduces post-harvest losses at the ZEST Data Service platform,retailer due to temperature handling and processing by 50% or more by intelligently matching customer freshness requirements with actual product freshness. It focuses on threefour primary value propositions – operational efficiency, consistent food quality,freshness, reduced waste, and improved food safety. ZESTZest Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence on everyat a pallet of delivered fresh food. ZESTlevel. Zest Labs also offers its Zest Delivery solution that provides real-time monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food.

 

Zest Labs was previously known as Intelleflex Corporation. Effective on October 28, 2016, Intelleflex Corporation changed its name to Zest Labs, Inc. to align its corporate name with its mission and the brand name of its products and services.

The ZESTZest Fresh value proposition is to reduce fresh food loss by improving quality consistency. In the US groceryU.S. produce market, it is reported that roughly 30% of post-harvest fresh food is lost or wasted and therefore not consumed. Both fresh food producers and retailers bear significant expense when harvested food is either rejected due to early spoilage or reduced in value due to early ripening. IntelleflexZest Labs believes that a significant portion of this waste can be attributed to inconsistent quality or freshness based on variable post-harvest processing and handling. Fresh food producers and retailers manage food distribution and inventory based on the harvest date, with the assumption that all food harvested on the same day will have the same freshness. However, studies have shown that harvest conditions and post-harvest handling can have a significant effect on the actual remaining freshness and, if not properly accounted for, can result in food loss or spoilage ahead of expectations. ZESTZest Fresh empowers fresh food producers and retailers to significantly reduce the post-harvest loss by providing real timereal-time guidance to process adherence, intelligent distribution and best handling practices, therebywith a goal of providing significant financial savings to fresh food producers and retailers.

 

ZEST

36

Zest Labs has developed the industry’s first freshness metric called the Zest Intelligent Pallet Routing Code (“ZIPR Code”). The ZIPR Code has three main components: Harvest Quality which sets total freshness capacity (for example, 12 days for strawberries), Handling Impact which reflects aging acceleration due to improper handling, and Future Handling which accurately reflects how the product will be handled (for example, store shelf temperature may be 40 degrees Fahrenheit instead of the ideal 34 degrees Fahrenheit).

Zest Fresh is offered to fresh food producers, processors, distributors, restaurants and retailersgrocers with pricing based on the number of pallets managed by ZEST,Zest Fresh, typically from the field harvest through retail grocery delivery. The ZESTZest Fresh service includes a re-usable wireless Internet of Things (“IoT”) condition sensor device that travels with the pallet of fresh food from the field or processor through retail delivery, continuously collecting product condition data. The collected pallet product data is analyzed, using artificial intelligence-based predictive analytics in real time by the ZESTZest Fresh cloud application,cloud-based solution, with the fresh food producers and retailers accessing data through ZESTZest Fresh web and mobile applications. ZESTZest Fresh provides workers with real timereal-time feedback on the current handling or processing of each pallet, empowering best practice adherence to achieve maximum freshness. ZESTZest Fresh also provides real timedynamic updates as to actual product freshness for each pallet, enabling intelligent routing and inventory management of each pallet in a manner that ensures optimum delivered freshness. Zest Fresh also includes integrated blockchain support to grower and shipper customers via the Zest Fresh platform.

 

ZESTZest Labs’ Zest Delivery managessolution helps to manage prepared food delivery from the restaurant through to the customer. ZESTZest Delivery manages the delivery container environment, both monitoring and controlling the product condition. The value of ZESTZest Delivery is to manage prepared meals in an ideal state for consumption, while accommodating extended pre-staging or delivery times. Extended pre-staging times are associated with “instant delivery” services of prepared meals, where the meals are often pre-staged in a delivery area ahead of demand. While pre-staging enables fast demand response time, it can result in prepared meals being staged for extended periods. ZESTperiods, which can potentially impact quality, value and safety. Zest Delivery monitors and controls the delivery container environment to preserve the prepared meal in ideal, ready to consume condition. ZESTZest Delivery also provides the dispatcher with real timereal-time remote visibility to the condition of available meals and confirming quality prior to dispatch. ZESTZest Delivery provides automated, real timereal-time visibility for a very distributed fleet of drivers, reflecting prepared meal food safety, quality and availability. ZESTZest Delivery is offered to meal delivery companies based on the quantity of delivery containers and frequency of use.

 

Eco3D™

Eco3d is a services based company that utilizes LiDAR laser scanningZest Labs currently holds rights to 69 U.S. patents (with additional patents pending), numerous related foreign patents, and U.S. copyrights relating to certain aspects of its Zest software, hardware devices including Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”) technology, fromsoftware, and services. In addition, Zest Labs has registered, and/or has applied to capture existing conditions from natural or man-made structures by creating a 3d data point cloud. These point clouds represent highly accurate dimensional data clearly identifying the X, Y,register trademarks and Z location from the scanner that emitted millions of points of light from a single position. Eco3d then scans the same subject area from different positions to provide even more 3d data. The raw data is registered/meshed together to create a federated data set that is then used to create 2d deliverables or 3d models.

This process literally represents the fastest and most accurate form of non-contact 3d measurement known to man-kind. The value proposition that Eco3d provides it utilizing this technology to ultimately save money on labor and materials expense as it relates to project costs. Secondary, but significant additional propositions include measuring at a distance to maintain the safety of the workforce; helping QA/QC the structure for overall asset management over the life of the project; providing meta-data to be used in the maintenance of the structure; providing virtual design validation; and communicating the existing conditions to allow for prototype solutions.

Eco3d provides this measuring service throughout North America to any client who wants to improve their short term and long term operational efficiency. The primary markets are construction, manufacturing, real estate, retail, oil/gas, energy, high purity, and healthcare. All of these industries are at their infancy of utilizing this technology which also makes Eco3d, as the largest provider in America, their consultant on the integration of this new technology and proprietary processes. The revenue sources from these existing and target industries represent trillion dollar plus market opportunity. Furthermore, this technology will form the basis for the upcoming democratization of augmented reality and virtual reality. The opportunities for integration know no boundaries geographically, politically, or economically. As human beings we live in a 3 dimensional world and this is the fastest, least expensive, form or digitizing/computerizing technology.

25

Pioneer Products

Pioneer Products began by creating new consumer products using plastic reclaimed from post-consumer and retailer’s waste streams. One of these products is Pioneer Products’ “close looped” 45-gallon trash can. Pioneer Products generates revenue from the sale of products such as plastic trash cans to 3,700 retail stores, including the largest retailers in the continental U.S. Pioneer Products’ competitors include large consumer products companies such as Rubbermaid and Hefty. A new product, office chairs, was introduced in 2016.

Building on a platform of proven retail success, Pioneer Products now leverages its solidified reputation and strategic network by acting as a broker for other products and companies that fit into its brand portfolio. Pioneer owns direct vendor relationships and vendor numbers with some of the largest retailersmarks in the U.S. This vendor number facilitates introduction of a new product to a retailer. Pioneer Products recently announced a new strategic alliance with a large distributor of family brands that strengthens its platform. Additionally, Pioneer’s offerings enable Ecoark to play a key role in supporting and making good on some of the world’s largest retailer’s goals of retail-level sustainability: reduction of waste within its supply chain and operations.

On May 3, 2016, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC was acquired by Ecoark Holdings and Pioneer Products for 2,000,000 shares of Ecoark Holdings common stock. Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products. Sable Polymer Solutions specializes in the sale, purchase and processing of quality post-consumer and post-industrial plastic materials. It provides services to a variety of suppliers and customers throughout the plastics processing industry, from small extruders, molders and scrap collectors to multinational corporations. It has a reputation of consistent quality and service in the market place today.

Magnolia Solar Inc.

Magnolia Solar, Inc. is principally engaged in the development and commercialization of its nanotechnology-based, high-efficiency, thin-film technology that can be deposited on a variety of substrates, including glass and flexible structures. Magnolia Solar believes that this technology has the potential to capture a larger part of the solar spectrum to produce high-efficiency solar cells, and incorporates a unique nanostructure-based antireflection coating technology to possibly further increase the solar cell's performance. If these goals are met, there is the potential of significantly reducing the cost per watt. Since its inception, Magnolia Solar, Inc. has not generated material revenues or earnings as a result of its activities. 

Description of Magnolia Solar, Inc.

Magnolia Solar Inc.’s (“Magnolia Solar”) mission is to commercialize its nanotechnology-based, high efficiency, thin film solar cell technology that can be deposited on glass and other flexible substrates to convert sun’s energy to electricity. This photovoltaic (PV) technology has the ability to capture a larger part of the solar spectrum to produce high efficiency solar cells, and incorporates a unique nanostructure-based antireflection coating technology to further increase the solar cell’s efficiency thereby reducing the cost per watt.

Magnolia Solar has been issued five patents. In addition, Magnolia Solar has filed several patents to protect intellectual property and are adding key technical personnel to validate and commercialize these solar cell technologies. The goal is to increase our solar cells’ efficiency from the present thin film solar cell efficiency of about 11%-13% to those rivaling efficiencies of crystalline photovoltaic cells in a commercial environment at a cost potentially reaching $0.50 per watt.
Technology development is in part supported by various government grants and Magnolia Solar has received multiple awards to advance the development of the technology:

In addition to these developmental activities, Magnolia Solar also benefits from the critical technologies being developed by Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc. (“Magnolia Optical”), a company controlled by two executive officers Ashok Sood and Yash Puri. Magnolia Optical has been at the forefront of pioneering the development of thin film, optical, and advanced solar cell technologies for high efficiency solar cells using nano-materials and technologies to use Ultraviolet, Visible and Infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum for imaging sensors and solar cell applications for Defense and Terrestrial Application. Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, has been in business since May 2000 and is a government-approved contractor for advanced technology developments. Magnolia Optical has, to date, received over $13 million of funding support from Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and other Department of Defense (DOD) agencies, NASA and NSF to fund the development of the advanced nanostructure-based technologies for optical and solar cell applications.

Magnolia Solar currently licenses core technology under development from Magnolia Optical. Under the license, Magnolia Solar has been granted an exclusive, fully paid, royalty free, worldwide license to use the intellectual property of Magnolia Optical relating to the design and fabrication of thin-film solar photovoltaic solar cells for the manufacture and sale of thin-film photovoltaic solar cell products and services. In consideration for the license grant, Magnolia Optical shareholders received, after giving effect to the Reverse Merger and Forward Split, 28,520 shares of common stock. The license has an initial term of ten years ending April 30, 2018 and shall automatically continue in effect thereafter unless terminated by either party. The license may be terminated for cause by either party.

26

Technology

Magnolia Solar has developed thin-film photovoltaic technology that includes the use of nanotechnology-based components to substantially enhance solar cell efficiency. This technology utilizes higher absorption of the solar spectrum to produce high-efficiency solar cells. The goal is to increase solar cell efficiency while using lower cost processes to minimize future production costs, with a goal of reaching less than one dollar per watt. Magnolia Solar plans to use low-cost substrates for solar cell fabrication that are substantially cheaper than conventional silicon substrates. Magnolia Solar plans to use either glass or polymer-based flexible substrates that are low cost and are available in large sizes, thereby bringing down the cost of thin film solar cells compared to those with silicon substrates.

Magnolia Solar has filed a series of U.S. utility and provisional patent applications. The utility patent applications claim the benefits of previously filed provisional applications. The utility and provisional patent applications filed over the past year detail a number of photovoltaic solar cell device designsforeign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services,” and methodsthe Zest, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery logos, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Many of manufacturing. The technologies related to these patent filings address the fundamental performance limitations in existing thin-film solar cells. The engineering employed in patent-pending technology isZest Labs’ products have been designed to increase the photovoltaic operating voltage while capturing a larger part of the solar spectrum, and the unique nanostructure-based optical coatings minimize reflection losses which enhances the light trapping within the photovoltaic devices. These technologies result in higher solar electric conversion efficiency by increasing both the voltage and current output of thin-film solar cells.

Government funding of some of research and development efforts imposed certain restrictions on the ability to commercialize results and could grant commercialization rights to the government. In some funding awards, the government is entitled toinclude licensed intellectual property rights arisingobtained from the related research. Such rights include a nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license to practice or have practiced each subject invention developed under an award throughout the world by or on behalf of the government. Other rights include the right to require us to grant a license to the developed technology or products to a third party or, in some cases, if Magnolia Solar refuses, the government may grant the license itself, if the government determines that action is necessary because Magnolia Solar fails to achieve practical application of the technology, because action is necessary to alleviate health or safety needs, to meet requirements of federal regulations, or to give the United States industry preference. Accepting government funding can also require that manufacturing of products developed with federal funding be conducted in the United States.

Industry Overview and Market Opportunity

Solar electric power or photovoltaic (PV) technology is the conversion of sunlight directly into electricity. The solar cells available today use semiconducting materials (similar to those used in computer chips and flat panel displays) such as silicon. These cells are the basic building blocks of complete systems. To provide useful amounts of power, the cells are wired together in varying numbers to create solar modules (also called solar panels).

A typical rooftop residential system may have one or two dozen modules. PV converts sunlight into electricity, with no moving parts, consuming no fuel, and creating no pollution. It is a distributed energy resource that can improve grid reliability, lower distribution and transmission costs, and be sited at the point of use with minimal or no environmental impact. In 2012, the worldwide solar PV module production was slightly below 30 GW. About 85% of these are made from silicon.

Magnolia Solar Cell and Anti-Reflection Coating Approach

Energetic radiation from the sun, reaching the Earth’s surface, includes ultra-violet, infrared and visible light. Our thin film solar cell design is being designed to enhance absorption in the UV spectrum and will be able to provide electricity more efficiently in hazy weather and very hot days using IR energy. Magnolia Solar is developing high-efficiency, thin-film solar cells employing nanostructured-based materials that can be used for producing high performance solar panels. The proprietary technology incorporates nano-materials and technologies that were developed under sponsorship by NYSERDA, DARPA, NASA, and the US Department of Defense. Magnolia Solar utilizes a nanostructure-based approach in the development of high-efficiency thin film solar cells. The technology is designed to permit absorption across a broad spectrum of light.

Optical reflection losses limit the performance of a wide variety of photonic and photovoltaic devices.  Magnolia Solar has demonstrated nanostructured optical coatings that can reduce reflection losses and enhance the performance of solar cells. Nanostructured optical coatings can be applied to the top surface of semiconductor solar cells to reduce reflection losses over a wide range of wavelengths and incident angles.  Anti-reflection (AR) coatings are an indispensable component of solar cell devices to reduce or suppress reflection losses, thus increasing the amount of light entering the solar cells device and enhancing the power conversion efficiency. Magnolia Solar demonstrated antireflection coatings comprised of step-graded, nanostructured SiO2 have been shown to significantly increase the transmittance through the optical glass windows. The double-sided, nanostructured SiO2 coatings outperform conventional MgF2 coatings, achieving average transmittance values in excess of 98% over a broad spectrum and wide range of incident angles. The demonstrated ultra-high broadband performance of nanostructured SiO2 anti-reflection coatings can benefit high performance single- and multi-junction solar cells.

Light trapping can dramatically improve solar cell performance by increasing the optical path length of photons within the thin film absorber layers. To further enhance the performance of the thin film solar cell, the bottom contact should also reflect unabsorbed light back into the CIGS thin film solar cell. Internal reflectors and light trapping structures on the underside of a semiconductor structure can improve the performance of a variety of photovoltaic devices and thin-film solar cells. By incorporating a high-performance back reflector, unabsorbed photons can be recycled and scattered back into the active region of a solar cell device. Magnolia Solar is developing a conductive omnidirectional back reflector employing nanostructured indium tin oxide (ITO). This is intended to diffuse the light as well, maximize the optical path length in the absorber layers.

27

Magnolia Solar is developing next generation nanostructure based CIGS thin film solar cells. Our cell design takes advantage of quantum structures such as quantum dots to enhance the solar cell efficiency beyond what is achievable today in CIGS thin film solar cells. Conventional solar cell modules are both heavy and rigid, typically employing fragile silicon wafers and thick panes of protective glass.  While these panels are suitable for fixed installations on rooftops and fields, flexible photovoltaic modules can provide a mobile source of electrical power for a wide variety of emerging applications in both terrestrial and space environments.  Magnolia Solar is developing flexible solar cell technologies for mobile and portable power applications.  The goal is to demonstrate solar cell efficiency in flexible CIGS greater than 20 percent.

Intellectual Property

Success depends, in part, on the ability to maintain and protect proprietary technology and to conduct business without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. Magnolia Solar relies primarily on a combination of patents and trade secrets, as well as associate and third party confidentiality agreements, to safeguard intellectual property. Since January 2010 Magnolia Solar has filed several patent applications to protect inventions arising from research and development, and are currently pursuing patent applications in the U.S. Five patents have been issued by the United States Patent Office. These patents are listed below:

Patent No.Title
8,865,506Roll-to-roll solution process method for fabricating CIGS solar cells and system for the same
8,895,838Multijunction solar cell employing extended heterojunction and step graded antireflection structures and methods for constructing the same
8,921,687High efficiency quantum well waveguide solar cells and methods for constructing the same
8,969,711Solar cell employing nanocrystalline superlattice material and amorphous structure and method of constructing the same
8,981,207High efficiency quantum dot sensitized thin film solar cell with absorber layer

Remaining patent applications and any future patent applications might not result in a patent being issued with the scope of the claims Magnolia Solar seeks, or at all, and any patents Magnolia Solar may receive or have received may be challenged, invalidated, or declared unenforceable.

With respect to proprietary know-how that is not patentable and processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, Magnolia Solar relies on, among other things, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to safeguard our interests. Magnolia Solar believes that many elements of the PV technology involve proprietary know-how, technology, or data that are not covered by patents or patent applications, including technical processes, equipment designs, algorithms, and procedures. Magnolia Solar has taken security measures to protect these elements. All research and development personnel have entered into confidentiality and proprietary information agreements with us. Magnolia Solar also requires business partners to enter into confidentiality agreements before Magnolia Solar discloses any sensitive aspects of our technology or business plans.

Magnolia Solar has not been subject to any material intellectual property claims.

Competition

Magnolia Solar is currently in the development stage and does not sell a finished product. Since the end product will provide an energy source to convert the renewable solar energy to electricity, Magnolia Solar will face competition from all forms of renewable energy technologies, including wind, hydropower, geothermal, biomass, and tidal technologies, as well as from other approaches to convert sun light to electricity. There is intense competition in the renewable energy market, specifically in the solar photovoltaic sector. There are already many established companies that sell solar cells and modules. During 2015, Magnolia Solar estimates that there were several hundred manufacturers of solar cells and modules with aggregate installed capacity exceeding global demand. This had the result of a significant drop in the prices of solar modules throughout the year. One of the principal drivers of competition is price per watt, which is a function of the underlying technology and production capacity. In addition, some sovereign nations actively support competitors located in those countries. This allows competitors from those countries to sometimes price finished products below their costs. While some countries are taking steps to offset these subsidies by imposing tariffs on imports, the global competition remains very intense. Success in this highly competitive environment will depend on attaining high efficiencies at low costs, without the use of sustained government subsidies.

Customers

Magnolia Solar is still in the development stage and does not presently have any customers. Magnolia Solar has used samples of anti-reflection coatings for evaluation. Magnolia Solar continues to pursue establishing relationships with various companies and explore collaborations with them. As Magnolia Solar exits the development stage, which is expected to occur in 2016, and commence the production of solar cells and/or anti-reflective coatings, Magnolia Solar expects to target federal civilian and military agencies and commercial customers including large corporations, non-governmental organizations, universities and solar powered electric generating stations.

Raw Materials

Magnolia Solar is developing high efficiency solar cells for defense and commercial applications. Under the Air Force Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Programs it has demonstrated thin film flexible solar cells using GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) based technology with very high efficiencies. Magnolia Solar is also developing nanostructured optical coating technology to improve the solar cell performance. The raw materials for this effort are glass, quartz, silicon wafers and nitrogen gas. The raw materials for growth and fabrication of these solar cells and the nanostructured optical coatings are also commonly used in the semiconductor industry and there are several suppliers of these materials and gases in the United States and overseas.

28

Environmental, Health and Safety Regulations

Solar Energy Industry

Magnolia Solar believes that economic and national security issues, technological advances, environmental regulations seeking to limit emissions by fossil fuel, air pollution regulations restricting the release of greenhouse gasses, aging electricity transmission infrastructure and depletion and limited supply of fossil fuels, has made reliance on traditional sources of fuel for generating electricity less attractive. Government policies, in the form of both regulation and incentives, have accelerated the adoption of solar technologies by businesses and consumers. For example, in the U.S., California now requires that 33% of the retail demand for electricity provided by utilities must be procured from renewable energy sources by 2020.

Government Subsidies and Incentives

Various subsidies and tax incentive programs exist at the federal and state level to encourage the adoption of solar power including capital cost rebates, performance-based incentives, feed-in tariffs, tax credits and net metering. Capital cost rebates provide funds to customers based on the cost of size of a customer's solar power system. Performance-based incentives provide funding to a customer based on the energy produced by their solar system. Under a feed-in tariff subsidy, the government sets prices that regulated utilities are required to pay for renewable electricity generated by end-users. The prices are set above market rates and may be differentiated based on system size or application. Feed-in tariffs pay customers for solar power system generation based on kilowatt-hours produced, at a rate generally guaranteed for a period of time. Tax credits reduce a customer's taxes at the time the taxes are due. Under net metering programs, a customer can generate more energy than used, during which periods the electricity meter will spin backwards. During these periods, the customer “lends” electricity to the grid, retrieving an equal amount of power at a later time. Net metering programs enable end-users to sell excess solar electricity to their local utility in exchange for a credit against their utility bills. Net metering programs are usually combined with rebates, and do not provide cash payments if delivered solar electricity exceeds their utility bills. In addition, several states have adopted renewable portfolio standards, which mandate that a certain portion of electricity delivered to customers come from a set of eligible renewable energy resources. Under a renewable portfolio standard, the government requires regulated utilities to supply a portion of their total electricity in the form of renewable electricity. Some programs further specify that a portion of the renewable energy quota must be from solar electricity. Since Magnolia Solar is still in the development stage, and products are not yet ready to benefit from any of these programs.

Despite the benefits of solar power, there are also certain risks and challenges faced by solar power. Solar power is heavily dependent on government subsidies to promote acceptance by mass markets. Magnolia Solar believes that the near-term growth in the solar energy industry depends significantly on the availability and size of these government subsidies and on the ability of the industry to reduce the cost of generating solar electricity. The market for solar energy products is, and will continue to be, heavily dependent on public policies that support growth of solar energy. There can be no assurances that such policies will continue. Decrease in the level of rebates, incentives or other governmental support for solar energy would have an adverse effect on the ability to sell products.

Description of Ecoark

Sales and Marketing

We sell our products and services through direct sales efforts and indirectly through distributors and resellers. Virtually all of our sales to-date have been derived from our direct sales efforts. However, we continue our efforts to establish a network of indirect sales channels.

Research and Development

We have devoted a substantial amount of our resources to software and hardware development activities in recent years. Total research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $1,114 and $1,053, respectively, and $752 in the first quarter of 2016. We incurred no capitalized software development costs in the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 nor in 2016 to date.

Competition

The market for cloud-based, real-time supply chain analytic solutions is rapidly evolving with new competitors with competing technologies, including companies that have greater resources than Ecoark. Some of these companies have brand recognition, established relationships with retailers, and own the manufacturing process. There are currently hundreds of sustainability programs available in the market. These programs are offered through retailers, manufacturers, and service providers. Ecoark believes that, analyzing the competitive factors affecting the market for its solutions, its products compete favorably by offering an integrated supply chain solution, with other companies offering real-time supply chain analytic solutions.

29


Intellectual Property

Ecoark and its subsidiaries have had 62 patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, with an additional 17 patent applications currently pending.

Employees

We had 91 full-time employees as of July 1, 2016, a substantial majority of whom are non-management personnel. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We have not experienced any work stoppages and believe that we have satisfactory employee relations. 

Government Regulation

The Company is subject to laws and regulations affecting its operations in a number of areas. These U.S. and foreign laws and regulations affect the Company’s activities including, but not limited to, in areas of labor, advertising, digital content, consumer protection, real estate, billing, e- commerce, promotions, quality of services, telecommunications, wireless communications and media, television, intellectual property ownership and infringement, tax, import and export requirements, anti-corruption, foreign exchange controls and cash repatriation restrictions, data privacy requirements, anti-competition, environmental, health and safety.

By way of example, lawsthird-parties. Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the many jurisdictions in which the CompanyZest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Such changes could include, among others, restrictions on the production, manufacture, distribution and use of devices. TheseWireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are also subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates,dates.

Although most components essential to Zest Labs’ business are generally available from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID or could precludeother wireless custom integrated circuits, and application-specific integrated circuits are currently obtained by Zest Labs from single or limited sources, principally in Asia.

Zest Labs is part of a very competitive industry that markets solutions to fresh food supply chain users, such as fresh food growers, producers and retailers. Many other companies that are both more established and command much greater resources compete in this market. While Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery offer new technical approaches and new user value, it remains uncertain if Zest Labs will gain sufficient adoption of its products to make them viable in the market. Further, it is unclear what industry competitors are developing that might address similar user needs. Zest Labs’ products provide a new approach for industry participants, and as with any new approach, adoption is uncertain as many in the industry can be slow to embrace new technology and/or new approaches. These market challenges can lead to extended sales cycles that may include extended pilot testing often at Zest Labs’ expense, for which the outcome remains unclear until the completion of each test. For these reasons, and others, forecasting new business adoption and future revenue can be very difficult and volatile. However, the Company from selling certain products.believes that Zest Fresh offers fresh food retailers, growers, shippers, processors and distributors an opportunity to differentiate their businesses in ways that the shipment of canned and boxed food products cannot, as competition in the agriculture, grocery, food service and restaurant markets continues to accelerate.

 

ComplianceAcquisition of 440 Labs

On May 18, 2017, the Company entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with these laws, regulationsZest Labs, 440labs, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (“440labs”), SphereIt, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company (“SphereIt”) and similar requirements may be onerousthree of 440labs’ executive employees. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, on May 23, 2017 the Company acquired all of the shares of 440labs in exchange for 300 shares of the Company’s common stock issued to SphereIt. 440labs is a cloud and expensive,mobile software developer which is now a subsidiary of Zest Labs. 440labs’ three executive employees signed employment agreements pursuant to which each of the three executive employees received 100 shares of the Company’s common stock and they may be inconsistent from jurisdictionbecame employed by Zest Labs. One of those employees resigned, and that position was filled with a new employee.

The acquisition of 440labs in May 2017 allowed Zest Labs to jurisdiction, further increasinginternally maintain its software development and information solutions for cloud, mobile, and IoT applications. 440labs had been a key development partner with Zest Labs for more than four years prior to the costMay 2017 acquisition, contributing its expertise in scalable enterprise cloud solutions and mobile applications.

37

Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc.

On May 31, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of complianceMerger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) for the Company to acquire 100% of Trend Holdings pursuant to a merger of Trend Holdings with and doing business. Any such costs, which may riseinto the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed as agreed in the Merger Agreement, the Company is the surviving entity in the Merger and the separate corporate existence of Trend Holdings has ceased to exist. Pursuant to the Merger, each of the 1,000 issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Trend Holdings was converted into 5,500 shares of the Company’s common stock. No cash was paid relating to the acquisition.

Discontinued Operations

Significant transactions related to discontinued operations include the following transactions.

Sale of Eco3d

On April 14, 2017, the Company sold the assets, liabilities and membership interests in Eco3d to a group led by executives of Eco3d after the Company’s Board concluded that Eco3d did not fit the future strategic direction of the Company. The Company received $2,029 in cash and 560 shares of the Company’s common stock that were held by executives of Eco3d, which shares were canceled. In accordance with ASC 205-20 and having met the criteria for “held for sale”, the Company reflected amounts relating to Eco3d as a resultdisposal group classified as held for sale at March 31, 2017 and included them as part of changes in these laws and regulations or in their interpretation, could individually ordiscontinued operations for the all periods presented. There was no significant continuing involvement with Eco3d following the sale. Gain on the sale of $636 was recognized in the aggregate makeCompany’s quarter ended June 30, 2017.

Sable

On May 3, 2016, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement by and among the Company, Pioneer Products, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company (“Sable”), and the holder of all of Sable’s membership interests. The Company issued 2,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of Sable’s membership interests. Sable has since been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products. In May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Pioneer and Sable.

On March 12, 2019 Sable sold substantially all of its assets other than cash and receivables to Kal-Polymers Americas, LLC (“Kal”) for $1,553, $825 of which was paid at closing and $726 was paid subsequent to March 31, 2019. Kal assumed the lease obligations of Sable, and the Company agreed to perform certain transition services for Kal for up to six months, principally accounting and systems support. That support has now been completed.

Magnolia Solar

In May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Magnolia Solar, and the sale was completed in May 2019.

Competition

Zest Labs operates in markets for products and services less attractivethat are highly competitive and face aggressive competition in all areas of their business.

The market for cloud-based, real-time supply chain analytic solutions—the market in which Zest Labs competes—is rapidly evolving. There are several new competitors with competing technologies, including companies that have greater resources than Ecoark Holdings, which operate in this space. Some of these companies are subsidiaries of large publicly traded companies that have brand recognition, established relationships with retailers, and own the manufacturing process.

Trend Holdings and its subsidiaries have significant competition from larger companies with greater assets and resources.

Sales and Marketing

We sell our products and services principally through direct sales efforts and the utilization of third-party agents. Zest Labs has marketing operations and programs for demand generation, public relations, and branding/messaging.

Trend Holdings and its subsidiaries provide fund administration and fund formation services to institutional investors and market their services through private marketing.

Research and Development

We have devoted a substantial amount of our resources to software and hardware development activities in recent years, principally for the Company’s customers, delayZest Labs initiatives. Ecoark Holdings believes that, analyzing the introduction of newcompetitive factors affecting the market for the solutions and services its subsidiaries provide, its products in one or more regions, or cause the Companyand services compete favorably by offering integrated solutions to change or limit its business practices.customers. The Company has implemented policiesincurred research and procedures designeddevelopment expenses of $2,109 and $2,541 in the nine months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, to ensure compliance with applicable lawsdevelop its solutions and regulations, but there can bedifferentiate those solutions from competitive offerings. Expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $424 and $900, respectively. We incurred no assurance thatcapitalized software development costs in the Company’s employees, contractors, or agents will not violate such lawsnine months ended December 31, 2019 and regulations or the Company’s policies and procedures.2018.

 

PROPERTIES

Magnolia Solar leases its Woburn, Massachusetts headquarters. Ecoark does not own any properties. It currently leases office and production space at the following locations: Rogers, Arkansas; Phoenix, Arizona; Salt Lake City, Utah; Flowery Branch, Georgia; Albany, New York and San Jose, California. The current property leases are considered adequate for its operations. 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGSIntellectual Property

 

Ecoark Holdings Ecoark and Magnolia Solar, Inc.its subsidiaries have had 69 patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and additional patent applications are not parties to any lawsuit or administrative proceeding as of the date hereof. Its management is not aware of any lawsuits or administrative proceedings that are threatened or anticipated, and we are not considering the institution or prosecution of any legal proceeding as of the date hereof.currently pending.

 

Trend Holdings does not have any patents or trademarks.

30

38

 

MANAGEMENT

 

Directors and Executive OfficersBOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our directors and executive officers as of July 1, 2016.

      Director of the
Name Age Positions Held with the Company Company Since
Randy S. May 56 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 2016*
John P. Cahill 64 Director 2016  
Peter Mehring 58 President, CEO and President of Zest Labs, Inc. and Director 2017  
Gary Metzger 68 Lead Director 2016*
Steven K. Nelson 62 Director 2017  

 

Name Age Position Year First Elected Director
Directors      
Randy May 52 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board 2016
Yash Puri 68 Chief Financial Officer and Director 2009
Greg Landis 54 Secretary and Director 2016
Gary Metzger 64 Director 2016
John P. Cahill 57 Director 2016
Terrence D. Matthews 57 Director 2016
Charles Rateliff 63 Director 2016
*Messrs. May and Metzger served on the board of directors of Ecoark, Inc. from 2011 and 2013, respectively, until it effected a reverse acquisition of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (“Ecoark” or “the Company”, formerly known as Magnolia Solar Corporation) on March 24, 2016. Messrs. May and Metzger joined the Board effective on April 11, 2016.

 

The following includes a brief biography for eachAll directors shall serve until the next annual meeting of our directorsstockholders and executive officers, with each director biography including information regardinguntil successors are duly elected or until the experiences, qualifications, attributesearliest of their removal or skills that caused our Board of Directors to determine that each member of our Board of Directors should serve as a director as of the date of this prospectus. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.resignation.

 

Directors

Randy S. May, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the BoardMay.

Ecoark, Inc. was incorporated on November 28, 2011. Since then, Randy Mr. May has servedbeen serving as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. As CEO, Randy leads a strong management team that is workingsince March 2016 and served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from March 2016 through March 28, 2017 and then from September 21, 2017 to deliver Ecoark’s missionthe present. He previously served as chairman of sustainable solutions throughthe board of directors and as chief executive officer of Ecoark, Inc. from its subsidiaries and strategic partners. Under his leadership, Ecoark has completed three strategic acquisitions since 2012. Randyincorporation until its reverse merger with Magnolia Solar in March 2016. Mr. May is a 25-year retail and supply-chain veteran with extensive experience in marketing, operational and executive roles.

Prior to Ecoark, RandyMr. May held a number of roles with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”), the world'sworld’s largest retailer based in Bentonville, Arkansas. From 1998-2004 Randy1998 to 2004, Mr. May served as Divisional Manager for half the United States for one of such company’sWalmart’s specialty divisions. There,divisions, where he was responsible for all aspects of strategic planning, finance, and operations for more than 18001,800 stores. He had complete P&Lprofit and loss responsibility for more than $4 billion dollars of sales at the time. Under Randy’sMr. May’s leadership, the business grew sales and market share in a strong competitive market. As founder of EcoarkMr. May’s qualifications and Ecoark’s primary innovator, it is essentialbackground that qualify him to have Mr. Mayserve on the Board include his strong managerial and leadership experience, his extensive knowledge of Directors.

31

Dr. Yash R. Puri, Chief Financial Officerstrategic planning, finance and Directoroperations, as well his ability to guide the Company.

 

Dr. Yash R. Puri was appointed our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and as a Director on December 31, 2009.  He brings many years of photovoltaic technology and applications experience both in the private sector and in academia. Dr. Puri brings experience in startup environment and growth management to the Magnolia team.

Previously from 1997 until 1999 Dr. Puri was VP of Finance for GT Equipment Technologies, Inc., (presently known as GT Advanced Technologies, Inc., NASDAQ: GTAT), equipment manufacturer serving the semiconductor and the photovoltaic industries. He helped this high technology startup, formed in 1994, to grow to revenue of about $20 million. The company won many rewards and much recognition; it was a New England finalist in the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year award. In this position, he was actively involved in running a high-technology business, and he successfully negotiated a $3.5 million line of credit with a major bank, established an audit relationship with one of the big-five accounting firms, established a foreign sales corporation, implemented a R&D credit program to reduce tax liabilities, and established company-wide management software to integrate manufacturing and financial operations. Near the end of his term there, he also successfully negotiated the company’s first subordinated debt issue.

Until recently, Dr. Puri was also a Professor of Finance and Chairman of the Finance Department at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. Dr. Puri was Principal Investigator of a photovoltaic commercialization project as well as several other grants, andJohn P. Cahill. Mr. Cahill has been a director of a technology commercialization program for engineering students, Chairman of the Management and Finance Department, and acting Associate Dean. In these positions, he successfully managed several externally funded projects and developed many years of experience in technology and growth management.

Dr. Puri holds a B.S. in Physics, a M.S. in Solid State Physics, and a M.B.A. from the University of Delhi. He also holds a M.B.A. in Finance and a D.B.A. in International Business from Indiana University, Bloomington. He has published many papers and has made numerous conference presentations.

As a co-founder of our subsidiary, Magnolia Solar, and many years of financial expertise in the photovoltaic industry, Dr. Puri’s experience and qualifications are essential to the Board of Directors.

Greg Landis:

Mr. Landis has servedserving on the Board of Directors of Ecoark since 2011. Mr. Landis is a Certified Public Accountant and, since August 2009, has served as the principal of the accounting firm of Landis & Associates, PLLC in Bentonville, Arkansas. Mr. Landis is licensed as a CPA in Arkansas and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Arkansas Society of Certified Public Accountants. Previously, Mr. Landis has served as the Chief Financial Officer of banks in Kansas, Arkansas and Texas including organizations with over $2 billion in assets. Prior to these positions, he was a manager in the largest CPA firm in Kansas. Mr. Landis graduated from Wichita State University in 1985 with a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration and a major in Accounting.

Gary Metzger:

Mr. Metzger has served on the Board of Directors of Ecoark since 2013. Mr. Metzger offers 40 years of product development, strategic planning, management, business development, and operational expertise. He had served as an executive at Amco International, Inc. and Amco Plastics Materials, Inc., where in 1986 he was named President for 24 years until Amco was sold to resin distribution giant Ravago Americas in December of 2011 at which time, he retired until joining the board of Ecoark. Mr. Metzger was co-owner of Amco Plastics Materials, Inc.

Mr. Metzger leadership and knowledge of manufacturing companies are an asset to the Board of Directors. In addition to his leadership functions, Mr. Metzger spearheaded research and development for recycled polymers, new alloy and bio-based polymer development, and introducing fragrance into polymer applications. He also developed encrypted item level bar code identification technology, anti-counterfeiting technologies, and antimicrobial technologies.

John P. Cahill:

May 2016. Mr. Cahill is currently Chief of Staff and Special Counsel to the Archbishop of New York. He has held this position since April of 2019. Previously he was Senior Counsel at the law firm of Norton Rose Fulbright (formerly Chadbourne & Parke LLPLLP) and has served in that capacity fromsince 2007. He is also a Principalprincipal at the Pataki-Cahill Group LLC, a strategic consulting firm focusing on the economic and policy implications of domestic energy needs, which he co-founded in March 2007. He served in various capacities in the administration of the Governor of New York, George E. Pataki (fromfrom 1997 to 2006),2006, including Secretary and Chief of Staff to the Governor (2002from 2002 to 2006).2006. He also serves on the board of directors of Sterling Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company tradedlisted on the New York Stock Exchange.  HisExchange (“NYSE”). Mr. Cahill’s extensive experience as an attorney in government and in business, as well as his extensive knowledge of and high-level experience in energy and economic policy, qualifies him as a member of the board.Board.

 

Terrence D. Matthews:Peter Mehring.

Mr. MatthewsMehring has been serving as the Chief Executive Vice President of JB Hunt Transport Services Inc.Officer and President of their Intermodal segmentEcoark’s subsidiary, Zest Labs, Inc. since January 1, 2012.  Mr. Matthews started with JB Hunt in 1986 where he was instrumental in the start-up of the Automotive Division. In 1989, he was responsible for the formation of the International Division overseeing operations in Canada2009 and Mexico. From 1994 to 1996, he was appointed President of TMM/Hunt in Mexico City overseeing J.B. Hunt's Mexican joint venture. Returning to J.B. Hunt's corporate office in Lowell, Arkansas in 1996, Mr. Matthews was appointed to positions of increasing responsibility until appointed to the position he now holds. Mr. Matthew’s expertise in the logistics and the supply chain qualifies him to serve asbecame a member of the board.

32

Charles Rateliff:

Mr. Rateliff retiredDirectors in 2005 from Walmart Stores Inc., as a Senior Vice President after a twenty-five year career. Since then, he has been an independent consultant for private investment firms. After receiving an MBA from the University of Arkansas, Mr. RateliffJanuary 2017. He was hired as an internal auditor for Walmart and within five years was promoted to assistant treasurer and treasurer. Over the course of Mr. Rateliff’s career at Walmart he worked across different departments including compliance, risk management, profit sharing and associate benefits.  His financial expertise and broad business knowledge highly qualify him as a board member for our Company.

Significant Employees

Dr. Ashok K. Sood, President

Dr. Ashok Sood held the roles of President, Chief Executive Officer and as a Director of Magnolia Solar since its inception. Prior to joining Magnolia Solar, Dr. Sood had over 35-years’ experience in developing and managing solar cells, optical, and optoelectronics technology and products for a start-up company and several major corporations, including Lockheed-Martin, BAE Systems, Loral, Honeywell, and Mobil-Tyco Solar Energy Corporation ( Joint Venture between Mobil Oil and Tyco). Dr. Sood was instrumental in development and managed optical and optoelectronics technology/ Programs.

Recently, Dr. Sood has managed the development of new technologies for anti-reflective coatings for solar cells and defense applications. He has also been actively engaged in working with several solar cell technologies that broaden the solar spectrum absorption and improve both voltage and current output of the cells to enhance their efficiency. Previously, he has been leading design and development of optoelectronics devices using CdS, CdTe, HgCdTe, GaN, AlGaN, InGaN and ZnO for various defense applications, solar cells for space, and commercial applications. Dr. Sood has led many efforts resulting in DoD/NASA programs developing the technology / products and supporting their transition to manufacturing. He also led various industry and university teams bridging centers of excellence across the United States with industry led programs.

Since joining Magnolia, Dr. Sood has focused his efforts on using nanotechnology for developing high performance thin film detectors and solar cells. His understanding of technology and funding opportunities is an asset to Magnolia Solar.

Dr. Sood received his Ph.D. and M.S. in Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania and has an M.S. and a B.S. in Physics (Honors) from Delhi University in India. At the University of Pennsylvania, he attended Physics courses given by two Nobel Laureates. His Ph.D. dissertation was on the study of optoelectronic properties of PbS/CdS for detector and laser applications in the visible to near infrared spectral bands. Dr. Sood has also taken several management courses and also attended professional development programs organized by the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

Dr. Sood is a member of IEEE and the SPIE. He has chaired sessions on optical and nanotechnology at conferences of those organizations. He has also been on several expert panels for future direction of thin-film solar cells.

Roshan Weerasinghe – Chief Operations Officer

Mr. Weerasinghe started with Ecoark in 2014 and was promoted to Chief Operations Officer in 2015. He has experience that spans over 18 years at Wal-Mart, Ingersoll Rand Asia Pacific and Climate Control Technologies. Prior to joining Ecoark, he was the Senior Director of Compliance and Food Safety for Walmart China, working out of an office in Shenzhen, China. In 2011 and 2012, Mr. Weerasinghe had his own consulting business advising big box and small regional retailers.

He is an innovative, assertive and goal oriented executive who offers a distinguished background of successfully propelling quality programs and initiatives that spur operational growth and profitability. Mr. Weerasinghe has excellent cross-cultural communication skills honed through years of experience operating in diverse countries including United States, China, Brazil, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Mexico, and Vietnam.

Troy Richards – Chief Administrative Officer

Mr. Richards has served as an advisor to the Company since 2013. He became an employee in June 2016 serving as Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Richards has extensive management and systems experience which includes 25 years as a franchisee of  the Wendy’s Company. At the height of the business, Richard had over 400 employees throughout the state of Arizona and owned and operated over 30 restaurants.

Mr. Richards actively serves on the foundation board of the Translational Genomics Research Institute (“TGen”) and has been involved in TGen’s growth in many areas, including advanced adrenal cancer research and institution-wide marketing. Mr. Richards received the Karl Eller Fellowship Business Award at the University of Arizona. Other past recipients include the current governor of Arizona.

33

Peter Mehring - President, Intelleflex

Mr. Mehring serves aselected President of Intelleflex Corporation since July 2009. PeterEcoark on September 25, 2017. Mr. Mehring brings extensive experience in engineering, operations and general management at emerging companies and large enterprises. As PresidentChief Executive Officer of Intelleflex,Zest Labs, Inc., he has led the company’sCompany’s efforts in pioneering on-demand data visibility and condition monitoring solutions for the fresh produce and pharmaceutical markets.

Hemarket. Prior to joining Zest Labs, Inc., from 2004 to 2006, Mr. Mehring was formerlythe Vice President of Macintosh hardware group at Apple Computer, Senior Vice President of Engineering at Echelon, and founder, General Manager and Vice President of R&D at UMAX. Mr. Mehring held Engineering Management positions at Radius, Power Computing Corporation, Sun Microsystems and Wang Laboratories. Mr. Mehring’s knowledge and experience in engineering, operations, management, product and service development and technological innovation are among the many qualifications that have led to the conclusion that Mr. Mehring is qualified to serve on the Board.

 

Ken Smerz –Gary Metzger. Mr. Metzger has been serving on the Board of Directors since March 2016 and served on the Board of Directors of Ecoark, Inc. from 2013 until its reverse merger with Magnolia Solar in March 2016. Mr. Metzger offers 40 years of product development, strategic planning, management, business development and operational expertise to the Board. He served as an executive at Amco International, Inc. and Amco Plastics Materials, Inc., where in 1986 he was named President Eco3Dand served in such role for 24 years until Amco was sold to global resin distribution company, Ravago Americas, in December 2011, where he remains a product developer and product manager. Mr. Metzger was co-owner of Amco Plastics Materials, Inc. and Amco International. Mr. Metzger’s leadership and knowledge of manufacturing companies, product development, strategic planning, management and business development are an asset to the Board of Directors. In addition to his leadership functions, Mr. Metzger spearheaded research and development for recycled polymers, new alloy and bio-based polymer development, and introduced fragrance into polymer applications. He also developed encrypted item level bar code identification technology, anti-counterfeiting technologies, and antimicrobial technologies. Taken together, these are among the many qualifications and the significant experience that have led to the conclusion that Mr. Metzger is qualified to serve on the Board.

Steven K. Nelson.Mr. SmerzNelson has been serving on the Board of Directors since April 2017. Since 2015, Mr. Nelson has been a lecturer for the Department of Accounting at the University of Central Arkansas. In 2015, Mr. Nelson retired as Vice-President, Controller of Dillard’s, Inc., where he was responsible for administering all aspects of financial accounting and reporting. Mr. Nelson began his career in 1980 as a staff accountant for Ernst & Young and attained the title of audit manager by the time he left the firm in 1984. Mr. Nelson maintains an active license as a Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) in the State of Arkansas. Mr. Nelson’s 35-year career as a CPA and his extensive experience as controller of a publicly traded company qualify him to serve on the Board and its Audit Committee. His broad experience as the former controller of a public company uniquely qualifies Mr. Nelson to advise Ecoark not only on general accounting and financial matters but also on various technical accounting, corporate governance and risk management matters that the Board may address from time to time. He possesses key insight on financial reporting processes and external reporting issues. The Board has determined that Mr. Nelson qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

39

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND MANAGEMENT

Set forth below is biographical information with respect to each current executive officer of the Company. Mr. May and Mr. Mehring also serve as directors of the Company. Officers are elected by the board of directors to hold office until their successors are elected and qualified.

NameAgePositions Held with the Company
Randy S. May56Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Peter Mehring58President, CEO and President of Zest Labs, Inc. and Director
William B. Hoagland38Secretary, Principal Financial Officer
Jay Puchir44Principal Accounting Officer, CEO and President of Banner Midstream Corp.

Jay Oliphant resigned as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer on May 15, 2019. Pursuant to a Separation Agreement with the Company (the “Separation Agreement”), Mr. Oliphant received his normal monthly salary through May 15, 2019. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Oliphant entered into a consulting agreement with the Company for a term of six months beginning May 16, 2019. Under the consulting agreement, Mr. Oliphant has agreed to assist the Company with financial reporting and related matters. William B. Hoagland was appointed as the Principal Financial Officer to succeed Mr. Oliphant. Mr. Hoagland has served as the Managing Member of Trend Capital Management, an investment fund, since 2011.

Executive Officers

Randy May. See “—Board of Directors” above for Mr. May’s biographical information.

Peter Mehring. See “—Board of Directors” above for Mr. Mehring’s biographical information.

William B. Hoagland. Mr. Hoagland is Principal Financial Officer of the Company. Immediately prior to joining Ecoark, Inc. in 2019, Mr. Hoagland spent the previous eight years as Managing Member of Trend Discovery Capital Management (“Trend Discovery”), a hybrid hedge fund since inception with a track record of outperforming the S&P 500. Prior to founding Trend Discovery in 2011, Mr. Hoagland spent six years as a Senior Associate at Prudential Global Investment Management (PGIM), working in both PGIM’s Newark, NJ and London, England offices. He has a Bachelor in Economics degree from Bucknell University. Mr. Hoagland holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a Level III candidate in the Chartered Market Technician Program.

Jay Puchir. Mr. Puchir is Principal Accounting Officer of the Company and the CEO and President of Eco 3D since December 2013. Prior to this appointmentBanner Midstream Corp. Mr. Puchir is currently serving a dual role as the Chairman and CEO of Banner Energy Services Corp (OTC: BANM). Mr. Puchir has also served as the CEO and President of Eco3D,Banner Midstream Corp from its formation in April 2018 to present. Mr. Puchir served in various roles as an Executive at the Company from December 2016 to April 2018 including Director of Finance, Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Puchir started his career as an auditor at PricewaterhouseCoopers and a consultant at Ernst & Young, ultimately achieving the position of Senior Manager at Ernst & Young. Mr. Puchir held the role of Associate Chief Financial Officer with HCA, and from March 2010 to February 2016 he served as Presidentboth the Accounting Manager and Director of Precision 3DFinance/Controller at The Citadel. Mr. Puchir is a licensed Certified Public Accountant. He received a Bachelor of Arts from December 2009the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Master of Business Administration from Rutgers University.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers, except that Mr. Metzger is Mr. Hoagland’s stepfather-in-law.

Involvement in Legal Proceedings

None of our directors, persons nominated to November 2013. Mr. Smerz has worked successfullybecome a director, executive officers or control persons have been involved in any of the following events during the past 26 years within the commercial/industrial construction industry as a contractor and business executive throughout the western U.S. His ability to build a strong team and provide outstanding leadership has been the cornerstone to his success. He has also continually identified new business opportunities and utilizing his entrepreneurial spirit, he’s injected new bolt-on opportunities to his existing business platforms.10 years:

 

Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; or

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences); or


40

 

Being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil violation), the SEC or the Commodity Future Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodity law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated; or

Being the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity. This violation does not apply to any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants; or

Being the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Board of Directors and CommitteesComposition

 

Our business and affairs are organized under the direction of our board of directors, which currently consists of five members. Our directors hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation, removal or disqualification, or until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our board of directors does not have a formal policy on whether the roles of a Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors should be separate. The primary responsibilities of our board of directors are to provide oversight, strategic guidance, counseling and direction to our management. Our board of directors meets on a regular basis. Our bylaws will be amended and restated to provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors.

We have no formal policy regarding board diversity. Our priority in selection of board members is identification of members who will further the interests of our stockholders through his or her established record of professional accomplishment, the ability to contribute positively to the collaborative culture among board members, knowledge of our business and understanding of the competitive landscape.

At each annual meeting of stockholders to be held after the initial classification, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will serve until the third annual meeting following their election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The authorized size of our board of directors is currently six members. The authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors.

Director Independence

While our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange that requires our independent board members, a majority of our directors and each member of our audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees are independent. A director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

After reviewing all relevant relationships, the Board of Directors currently consists of seven members. Members of our Board of Directors are elected annually and serve until a successor has been elected and qualified or their earlier death, resignation or removal. Our Board of Directors has determinedconcluded that each of Messrs. Cahill, Matthews, Metzger, and RateliffNelson are “independent," as defined byindependent under the SEC rules adopted pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and in accordance with Rule 4200(a)(15)NYSE Corporate Governance Rules. No director or executive officer of the Marketplace RulesCompany is related to any other director or executive officer of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Company by blood, marriage or adoption. In making its independence determination, the Board considered all relevant transactions, relationships, or arrangements, including those disclosed under the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Board Leadership Structure. The Board of Directors has no fixed policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board retains the discretion to determine, at any time, whether to combine or separate the positions as it deems to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The roles of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are currently performed by one individual.

 

Our Board of Directors established an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating committee, each of which operates pursuant to a separate charter adopted by our Board of Directors. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board of Directors, and those committees are chaired by “independent directors”.

Director

Audit

Committee

Compensation

Committee

Nominating
Committee
Gary MetzgerXXX
John P. Cahill*X
Terrence D. MatthewsXXX
Charles RateliffX

Furthermore, for our audit committee, Charles Rateliff shall serve as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined underbylaws provide that the applicable rulesChairman of the SEC and he has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. We have also establishedBoard may be elected by a corporate governance committee on our board of directors.

34

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of “independent," directors as defined by SEC rules adopted pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (“SOX”).

The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter. The Audit Committee oversees the financial reporting process for the Company on behalfmajority vote of the Board of Directors and has other duties and functions as described in its charter.

The Company’s management hasshall serve until the primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements and the reporting process. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Our Audit Committee serves to monitor our financial reporting process and internal control system; retains and pre-approves audit and any non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered accounting firm; directly consults with our independent registered public accounting firm; reviews and appraises the efforts of our independent registered public accounting firm; and provides an open avenue of communication among our independent registered public accounting firm, financial and senior management and the Board of Directors.

As of June 30, 2016 the Company’s unaffiliated market capitalization as defined by SEC Rule 12b-2 exceeded $75,000. As such the Company now has accelerated filer status beginning with its annual report to be filed on Form 10-K by March 16, 2017. In addition the Company is now subject to additional requirements of SOX section 404 which addresses internal controls over financial reporting (“ICFR”). The additional requirements include attestation by an independent auditor with respect to the Company’s ICFR.

Item 308 of SEC Regulation S-K addresses the SOX requirements described above including the responsibility of management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. Management has undertaken several initiatives to improve its ICFR including implementation of a standard chart of accounts and a centralized, cloud-based accounting and Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system from NetSuite. That system was implemented at six Company entities in the first half of 2016 and is currently being implemented at the new subsidiary Sable Polymer Solutions.

In addition to the implementation of NetSuite, the Company hired additional experienced accounting staff and has scheduled a specific program to ensure compliance with SOX section 404 and further strengthen ICFR. The Company will more formally document risks relating to ICFR, design additional controls to address those risks, document the execution of the controls and have this tested by its independent registered public accounting firm. These activities will take place in the second half of 2016 with reporting to the Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of “independent," directors as defined by SEC rules adopted pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in the Compensation Committee’s charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

Among its duties, our Compensation Committee determines the compensation and benefits paid to our executive officers, including our President, Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Chairman. Our Compensation Committee reviews and determines salaries, bonuses and other forms of compensation paid to our executive officers and management, approves recipients of stock option awards and establishes the number of shares and other terms applicable to such awards. Our Compensation Committee also determines the compensation paid to our Board of Directors, including equity-based awards. More information about the compensation of our non-employee directors is set forth in the section of this annual report titled “Director Compensation.”

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee is currently comprised of “independent," directors as defined by SEC rules adopted pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating Committee are set forth in the Nominating Committee’s charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

Our Nominating Committee is charged with recommending the slate of director nominees for election to the Board of Directors, identifying and recommending candidates to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors. Among its duties and responsibilities, the Nominating Committee periodically evaluates and assesses the performancemeeting of the Board of Directors; reviewsfollowing the qualifications of candidates for director positions; assists in identifying, interviewing and recruiting candidates for the Board of Directors; reviews the composition of each committee of the Board of Directors and presents recommendations for committee memberships; and reviews and recommends changes to the charter of the Nominating Committee and to the charters of other Board of Director committees.

The process followed by the Nominating Committee to identify and evaluate candidates includes (i) requests to Board of Director members, our Chief Executive Officer, and others for recommendations; (ii) meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates and their qualifications; and (iii) interviews of selected candidates. The Nominating Committee also considers recommendations for nomination to the Board of Directors submitted by shareholders.

In evaluating the suitability of candidates to serve on the Board of Directors, including shareholder nominees, the Nominating Committee seeks candidates who are “independent," as defined by SEC rules adopted pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and who meet certain selection criteria established by the Nominating Committee.

35

Board Attendance

Our Board held four meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. All of our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of our Board held in 2015. We encourage each of our directors to attend eachnext annual meeting of stockholders at which such Chairman is re-elected. The Chairman of the Board shall preside at all meetings. Otherwise, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) provide that a lead director selected by the non-management directors (the “Lead Director”) shall preside at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present. The Guidelines require that the Lead Director shall preside at executive sessions of the non-management directors. The non-management directors will meet in executive session, no less frequently than quarterly, as determined by the Lead Director, or when such meetings are held. We did not hold an annual meetinga director makes a request of stockholders in 2015.the Lead Director. Gary Metzger currently serves as the Lead Director.

 

41

The Board believes that maintaining a healthy mix of qualified independent and management directors on the Board is an integral part of effective corporate governance and management of the Company. The Board also believes that the current leadership structure strikes an appropriate balance between independent directors and directors, which allows the Board to effectively represent the best interests of the Company’s entire stockholder base.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

We face a number of risks, including those described under the caption “Risk FactorsOversight.” contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Our The Board of Directors believes that risk management is an important part of establishing, updating and executing on our business strategy. OurThe Board of Directors has oversight responsibility relating to risks that could affect the corporate strategy, business objectives, compliance, operations, and the financial condition and performance of the company. Our Board of DirectorsCompany, and focuses its oversight on the most significant risks facing us and, on our processes, to identify, prioritize, assess, manage and mitigate those risks. OurThe Board of Directors receives regular reports from members of the company’sCompany’s senior management on areas of material risk to us, including strategic, operational, financial, legal and regulatory risks. While ourthe Board of Directors has an oversight role, management is principally tasked with direct responsibility for management and assessment of risks and the implementation of processes and controls to mitigate their effects on us.

 

Stockholder Communications withCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee (“Nominating Committee”). The duties and responsibilities of the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may make their concerns known confidentiallyNominating Committee are set forth in the charter of the Nominating Committee adopted by the Board. The Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to serve on the Board of Directors or the independent directors by sending an email to Brad Hoagland, CFA at bhoagland@ecoarkusa.com. Each communication should specify the applicable addressee or addresseesand recommending individuals to be contactednominated by the Board for election by stockholders or appointed by the Board to fill vacancies. Among its duties and responsibilities, the Nominating Committee is responsible for shaping corporate governance, reviewing and assessing the Guidelines, recommending Board compensation, and overseeing the annual evaluation of the Board. The Nominating Committee has the authority to retain compensation or other consultants as well as search firms for director candidates. In accordance with its charter, the general topic of the communication. The Company will initially receive and process communications before forwarding them to the addressee. The Company generally will not forward to the directors a communication thatNominating Committee meets as often as it determines to be primarily commercial in nature or related to an improper or irrelevant topic, or that requests general information about the Company.necessary, but at least four times each year.

 

CodeThe Nominating Committee currently consists of Ethics

All Company employeesMessrs. Cahill, as chair, Metzger, and directors, includingNelson. The process followed by the Nominating Committee to identify and evaluate candidates includes (i) requesting recommendations from the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, and other parties, (ii) meeting to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates and their qualifications, and (iii) interviewing selected candidates. The Nominating Committee also considers recommendations for nomination to the Chief Financial Officer,Board submitted by stockholders. A stockholder who desires to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board should notify the Secretary of the Company or any member of the Nominating Committee in writing with supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate. The Nominating Committee has the authority and ability to retain compensation or other consultants and search firms to identify or evaluate director candidates.

In evaluating the suitability of candidates to serve on the Board, including stockholder nominees, the Nominating Committee seeks candidates who are required to abideindependent, as defined by the Company’s Sarbanes-Oxley Act, related SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, and who meet certain selection criteria established by the Nominating Committee. The selection criteria include many factors, including a candidate’s general understanding of elements relevant to the success of a publicly traded company in the current business environment, understanding of our business, and educational and professional background. The Nominating Committee also considers a candidate’s judgment, competence, anticipated participation in Board activities, experience, geographic location and special talents or personal attributes. The guidelines provide that the composition of the Board should encompass a broad range of skills, expertise, industry knowledge, diversity, and contacts relevant to our business. Moreover, with respect to incumbent directors, the Nominating Committee also considers past performance, including attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board, and the director’s ability to make contributions after any significant change in circumstances (including changes in employment or professional status).

Board Leadership Structure

Our board of directors is free to select the Chairman of the board of directors and a Chief Executive Officer in a manner that it considers to be in the best interests of our company at the time of selection. Currently, Randy May serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors. Our board of directors, as a whole and also at the committee level, plays an active role overseeing the overall management of our risks. Our Audit Committee reviews risks related to financial and operational items with our management and our independent registered public accounting firm. Our board of directors is in regular contact with our Chief Executive Officer, who reports directly to our board of directors, and Principal Financial Officer.

Board Committees

Our board of directors has established three standing committees—audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance—each of which operates under a charter that has been approved by our board of directors. Prior to the completion of this offering, copies of each committee’s charter will be posted on the Investors section of our website, which is located at www.zestlabs.com. Each committee has the composition and responsibilities described below. Our board of directors may from time to time establish other committees.

Audit Committee

The current members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Nelson, as chair, Cahill, and Metzger, each of whom is a non-employee member of our board of directors. Mr. Nelson is our audit committee chairman and financial expert, as that term is defined under the SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and possesses financial sophistication, as defined under the rules of The Nasdaq Global Select Market.

The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the charter of the Audit Committee adopted by the Board. The Audit Committee generally assists the Board in its oversight of the relationship with our independent registered public accounting firm, financial statement and disclosure matters, the internal audit function, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee meets as often as it determines necessary, and at least four times each year.

42

Management has the primary responsibility for our financial statements and the reporting process, and our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Audit Committee also monitors our financial reporting process and internal control system, retains and pre-approves audit and any non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered accounting firm, directly consults with our independent registered public accounting firm, reviews and appraises the efforts of our independent registered public accounting firm, and provides an open avenue of communication among our independent registered public accounting firm, financial and senior management and the Board. The Audit Committee has the authority to retain independent legal, accounting, and other advisors.

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an independent director under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, related SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards related to audit committees, and that each satisfies all other applicable standards for service on the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that Mr. Nelson meets the requirements adopted by the SEC for qualification as an audit committee financial expert. The identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than those that are imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board in the absence of such identification. Moreover, the identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert for purposes of the regulations of the SEC does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or the Board. Finally, a person who is determined to be an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an “expert” for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.

The Audit Committee held seven meetings in fiscal 2020. The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act and operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC A copy of the audit committee charter is available on our website athttps://www.zestlabs.com/downloads/Audit-Commitee.pdf.

Code of ConductEthics

We have a Code of Ethics as defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K, which code applies to ensure thatall of our directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. All directors, officers, and other employees are expected to be familiar with the Company’s business is conducted in a consistently legalCode of Ethics and ethical manner.to adhere to the principles and procedures set forth therein. The Code of ConductEthics forms the foundation of a comprehensive program that requires compliance with all corporate policies and procedures and seeks to foster an open relationship among colleagues that contributes to good business conduct and an abiding belief in the integrity of our employees. The Company’sOur policies and procedures cover all areas of professional conduct, including employment policies, conflicts of interest, intellectual property, and the protection of confidential information, as well as strict adherence to all laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of the Company’sour business.

 

EmployeesDirectors, officers, and other employees are required to report any conduct that they believe in good faith to be an actual or apparent violation of the Code of Conduct.Ethics. The full text of the Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.ecoarkusa.com.https://www.zestlabs.com/downloads/Code-of-Ethics-2016.pdf. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, any provision of our Code of Ethics by posting such amendment or waiver on our website.

 

Corporate Governance GuidelinesRole of Board in Risk Oversight Process

 

We face a number of risks, including those described under the caption “Risk Factors” contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Our board of directors believes that risk management is an important part of establishing, updating and executing on our business strategy. Our board of directors has oversight responsibility relating to risks that could affect the corporate governance guidelines are designed to help ensure effective corporate governance. Our corporate governance guidelines cover topics including, but not limited to, director qualification criteria, director responsibilities, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, communications from stockholders to the board, succession planningstrategy, business objectives, compliance, operations, and the annual evaluations of the boardfinancial condition and its committees. Our corporate governance guidelines are reviewed by the corporate governance committeeperformance of our company. Our board of directors focuses its oversight on the most significant risks facing us and revised when appropriate. The full texton our processes to identify, prioritize, assess, manage and mitigate those risks. Our board of directors receives regular reports from members of our Corporate Governance Policysenior management on areas of material risk to us, including strategic, operational, financial, legal and regulatory risks. While our board of directors has an oversight role, management is availableprincipally tasked with direct responsibility for management and assessment of risks and the implementation of processes and controls to mitigate their effects on our website at www.ecoarkusa.com.us.

 

36

43

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table below sets forth, for the last two fiscal years,provides information regarding the compensation earned by each of our principalnamed executive officer and principal financial officers during the last fiscal year (“named executive officers”). No other executive officer hadyears ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.

Name and Principal Position Fiscal Year  Salary(1)  Stock
Awards(2)
  Option
Awards(2)
  Total 
Randy S. May(3)  2020  $200,000  $-  $-  $200,000 
Chairman of the Board  2019  $200,000  $-  $-  $200,000 
and Chief Executive Officer                    
                     
Peter Mehring  2020  $200,000  $-  $-  $200,000 
President, Chief Executive Officer  2019  $200,000  $-  $-  $200,000 
and President of Zest Labs, Inc.                    
                     
William B. Hoagland(4)  2020  $115,156  $-  $-  $115,156 
Secretary, Principal Financial Officer  2019   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
                     
Jay Puchir(5)  2020  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Principal Accounting Officer and CEO and
President of Banner Midstream
  2019   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
                     
Jay Oliphant(6)  2020  $36,098  $-  $-  $36,098 
Former Principal Financial Officer  2019  $170,000  $-  $-  $170,000 

(1)We periodically review, and may increase, base salaries in accordance with the Company’s normal annual compensation review for each of our named executive officers.

(2)Stock and option awards are based on the grant date fair values and are calculated utilizing the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” See Notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements of the Company contained in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 for further information regarding assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards.

(3)Mr. May served as Chief Executive Officer of Ecoark from March 2016 through March 28, 2017 and then from September 21, 2017 to the present.

(4)Mr. Hoagland replaced Mr. Oliphant on June 1, 2019.

(5)Mr. Puchir was named Principal Accounting Officer on March 27, 2020.

(6)Jay Oliphant resigned as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer on May 15, 2019. Pursuant to a Separation Agreement with the Company (the “Separation Agreement”), Mr. Oliphant received his normal monthly salary through May 15, 2019. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Oliphant entered into a consulting agreement with the Company for a term of six months beginning May 16, 2019. Under the consulting agreement, Mr. Oliphant has agreed to assist the Company with financial reporting and related matters. William B. Hoagland was appointed as the Principal Financial Officer to succeed Mr. Oliphant. Mr. Hoagland has served as the Managing Member of Trend Discovery Capital Management, an investment fund, since 2011.

Employment, Severance, Separation and Change in excess of $100,000 during the last fiscal year.Control Agreements

 

           Option  All Other    
     Salary  Bonus  Awards  Compensation  Total 
Name and Principal Position Year  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($) 
Dr. Ashok K. Sood  2015   17,850           44,850(1)  62,700 
President  2014   43,160           37,550(1)  80,710 
                         
Dr. Yash R. Puri,  2015   17,850           44,850(1)  62,700 
CFO  2014   33,920           45,310(1)  78,230 
                         

Randy May

  2015   207,692               207,692 
Chief Executive Officer  2014   200,000               200,000 
                         

Greg Landis

  2015   20,192           173,000(2)  192,192 
Corporate Secretary  2014   -           245,000(2)  245,000 

Executive Employment Arrangements

 

(1)Represents accrued but unpaid salary.
(2)Represents payments to Landis & Associates PLLC for accounting services.

Peter Mehring

 

The terms of Mr. Mehring’s employment with Ecoark are set forth in an offer letter accepted on August 15, 2013. Pursuant to the offer letter, Mr. Mehring received an annual base salary of $300,000 (subsequently adjusted and accepted) and is eligible to participate in regular health insurance, bonus, and other employee benefit plans established by Ecoark. The offer letter also includes standard confidentiality and non-complete obligations. The parties are permitted to terminate employment for any reason, at any time, with or without notice and without cause. The offer letter also contains severance benefit provisions in the event that Mr. Mehring’s employment is terminated without “Cause” (as defined in the offer letter) or Mr. Mehring terminates his employment for “Good Reason” within 12 months following a “Change in Control” (as defined in the offer letter). If Mr. Mehring is terminated without “Cause,” then he is entitled to receive an amount equal to six months base salary. If he terminates his employment for “Good Reason” within 12 months following a “Change in Control,” then Mr. Mehring is entitled to receive an amount equal to six months base salary and accelerated vesting of a portion of the non-vested options or shares. In order to receive severance benefits under the offer letter, Mr. Mehring is required to sign a release and waiver of all claims. Finally, Ecoark reserves the right to change or otherwise modify, in its sole discretion, the terms of the offer letter.

Potential Payments Upon Change of Control

We have no liabilities under termination or change in control conditions. We do not have a formal policy to determine executive severance benefits. Each executive severance arrangement is negotiated on an individual basis.

44

Option Grants and Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-EndMarch 31, 2020

 

ThereEffective October 13, 2017, the Compensation Committee issued new options awards (the “Replacement Options”) in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards (the “Existing Awards”) previously granted to Peter Mehring. In addition, the Committee approved new option awards to Mr. Mehring that vest over a four-year period (the “New Options”) to induce them to accept the Replacement Options; to compensate them for diminution in value of their Existing Awards as compared to the Replacement Options; and in consideration of a number of other factors, including each individual’s role and responsibility with the Company, their years of service to the Company, and market precedents and standards for modification of equity awards.

The Replacement Options and New Options are designed to better align Mr. Mehring’s potentially realizable equity compensation with Company performance. Because the incentive value of stock options is tied to future appreciation in stock price, the Committee believes stock option grants will better align our executive officers and employees’ interests with those of the Company and its stockholders and, as a result, the Compensation Committee intends to continue to utilize options to a greater extent in our equity compensation program on a going forward basis.

With respect to the Replacement Options, Mr. Mehring has agreed to forfeit Existing Awards covering 1,345 shares of the Company’s common stock, and was granted Replacement Options to purchase an equal number of shares of Company common stock. The exercise price for the Replacement Options was set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants (October 13, 2017). In consideration of Mr. Mehring’s agreement to forfeit their Existing Awards, the Committee, after careful deliberation, determined that 100% of Mr. Mehring’s Replacement Options would vest immediately upon grant.

With respect to the New Options, Mr. Mehring was granted options to purchase 2,018 shares of Company common stock, that vest at a rate of 25% per year on October 13th of each year from 2018 to 2021, subject to Mr. Mehring’s continued employment by the Company. As with the Replacement Options, the New Options have an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grant. The New Options were no outstanding unexercisednot granted under any of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans. On June 6, 2020, the Compensation Committee approved the modification of these stock options unvestedas allowable by the Company’s 2013 Incentive Stock Option Plan and 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan to amend the strike price of the executive’s stock and/oroption grant from $2.60 per share to $0.73 per share.

On October 3, 2019, the Company granted 1,000 options to Mr. Mehring that vest over four years at an exercise price of $0.50.

The following table presents information concerning equity incentive plan awards issued toheld by our named executive officers as of DecemberMarch 31, 2015.2020 (not in thousands).

    

Number of

Securities

  

Number of

Securities

  Option Awards
Name Vesting
Commencement
Date
 Underlying
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Underlying
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
Peter Mehring 10/13/2017  2,353,750   1,258,750   0.73  10/23/2027
  10/3/2019  250,000   750,000   0.73  10/23/2027

2020 Director Compensation Table

 

Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control

None of the principal executive officers listed above are under employment contracts.

Director Compensation

Our directors did not receive monetary compensation for their service on the Board of Directors for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Directors may receive compensation for their services and reimbursement for their expenses as shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board. Beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2018, directors will receive each quarter a stock option with a Black-Scholes value of $25,000. Additional options are granted for placement and attendance at committee meetings. Options will be granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Ecoark’s common stock.

 

The following table sets forth the compensation earned to our non-employee directors for service during the year ended March 31, 2020:

37
Name 

Fees
Earned

($)

  

Stock
Awards

($)

  

Total

($)

 
John P. Cahill  9,000   130,000   139,000 
Gary Metzger  9,000   160,000   169,000 
Steven K. Nelson  9,000   160,000   169,000 
Michael Green  4,500   121,000   125,500 

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONSSee additional information on compensation above in Summary Compensation Table for directors Randy May and Peter Mehring.

 

We do not believeCompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our Compensation Committee consists of three directors, each of whom is a non-employee director: Messrs. Cahill (formerly Green), as chair, Metzger and Nelson. None of the aforementioned individuals was an officer or employee of ours, was formerly an officer of ours or had any relationship requiring disclosure by us under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No interlocking relationship as described in Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K exists between any of our non-employeeexecutive officers or Compensation Committee members, on the one hand, and the executive officers or compensation committee members of any other entity, on the other hand, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past. 

45

Employee Benefit Plans

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

2013 Incentive Stock Plan

The 2013 Incentive Stock Plan of Ecoark Holdings (previously Magnolia Solar Corporation) (the “2013 Incentive Stock Plan”) was registered on February 7, 2013. Under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan, the Company may grant incentive stock in the form of Stock Options, Stock Awards and Stock Purchase Offers of up to 5,500,000 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, has a material relationship with us that could interfere with his abilityconsultants and advisors. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his responsibilities. The Company’s Board of Directors has reviewed and approved of each of the following transactions. The Company’s Code of Conduct governs the Board’s consideration of transactions which could give rise to a conflict of interest, mandating that each director disclose any potential conflict of interest and permittingbe established by the Board to determine that such director may not participate in deliberations relating toat the considerationdate of the transaction giving rise to such conflict of interest. The full text of the Code of Conduct is available on our website at www.ecoarkusa.com.grant.

 

2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan

The 2017 Ecoark Holdings Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan”) was registered on June 14, 2017. Under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company may grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, and other awards. Awards of up to 4,000,000 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are available under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following is a summary of long-term debt with Randy May,table contains information about the Chief Executive Officer,2013 Incentive Stock Plan and entities he controls,the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan as of DecemberMarch 31, 2015 and 2014:2020:

 

     2015  2014 
Promissory note #1 – CEO  (a)   62   227 
Promissory note #2 – CEO  (b)      2,500 
Promissory note #3 – CEO  (c)   1,217    
Note payable – Goldenhawk  (d)      3,674 
Note payable - other  (e)      1,600 
       1,279   8,001 
Plan category 

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options, warrants
and rights

  

Weighted-
average exercise
price of

outstanding
options,

warrants and rights

  

Number of securities

available for future issuance under equity compensation

plans (excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:         
2013 Incentive Stock Plan  1,732,500  $2.52   454,000 
2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan  2,671,084  $1.54   1,226,000 
Equity compensation not approved by stockholders  8,222,270(1) $1.22   - 
Total  12,625,854  $2.30   1,680,000 

(1)Represents non-qualified stock options not granted under any existing equity compensation plans.

 

The highest balanceLimitation on liability of these notes during the 2015 fiscal year was $9,097.officers and directors

 

(a) Note payableNevada law provides that subject to certain very limited statutory exceptions, a director or officer is not individually liable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Randy May. In 2013corporation or its stockholders or creditors for any damages as a result of any act or failure to act in his or her capacity as a director or officer, unless it is proven that the act or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer and 2014 the note was accruing interest at the ratesuch breach of 10% through November 16, 2014. On November 16, 2014, the then outstanding principalthose duties involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of $1,174 and the accrued interestlaw. The statutory standard of $493 were combined with the outstanding balances of other shareholder notesliability established by NRS Section 78.138 controls even if there is a provision in the principal amountcorporation’s articles of $1,100incorporation unless a provision in the corporation’s articles of incorporation provides for greater individual liability.

Indemnification

Nevada law permits broad provisions for indemnification of officers and accrued interestdirectors.

Our bylaws provide that each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved (including, without limitation, as a witness) in any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether formal or informal, civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”), by reason of $908 (see note (a)the fact that he or she is or was a director of or who is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of this or another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, other enterprise, or employee benefit plan (a “covered person”), whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a covered person shall be indemnified and held harmless by us to createthe fullest extent permitted by applicable law, as then in effect, against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees, costs, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and amounts to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith, and such indemnification shall continue as to a new noteperson who ceased to be a covered person and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and administrators.

However, no indemnification shall be provided hereunder to any covered person to the extent that such indemnification would be prohibited by Nevada state law or other applicable law as then in effect, nor, with respect to proceedings seeking to enforce rights to indemnification, shall we indemnify any covered person seeking indemnification in connection with a related company “Goldenhawk” referredproceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person except where such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by our board of directors, nor shall we indemnify any covered person who shall be adjudged in any action, suit or proceeding for which indemnification is sought, to below. The new note payable from November 17, 2014 through December 31, 2014 was an unsecured note bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum, maturing in November 2015. On November 30, 2015, after monthly payments were being made, and additional amounts funded in March 2015 and May 2015 totaling $600, the Company along with the $2,500 note, combined these amounts into a new one year promissory notebe liable for any negligence or intentional misconduct in the amountperformance of $3,197 due November 30, 2016. Paymentsa duty.

SEC Policy on Indemnification for Securities Act liabilities

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of $30 were made on this note1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the first quarter of 2016.

(b) Unsecured note payable with the Company’s CEO, bearing interest at 6% per annum. Quarterly interest payments were due commencing February 2015, with the note maturing in November 2015. Note was the resultopinion of the value of the 5,000 Class A Common Shares re-acquired on November 16, 2014 from the CEO in an effort to raise capital without further dilution to the current shareholders. See (c) above for details on the extension of this note.

(c) Note payable with the Company’s CEO commencing November 30, 2015 at an interest rate of 6% per annum (see note c). The beginning principal balance of $3,197 was reduced by $1,980 on December 31, 2015 in exchange for 550 shares of Series A General Common Shares that were Treasury Shares owned by the Company. The remaining principal balance matures in November 2016.

(d) Commencing November 16, 2014, this note had interest at the rate of 6% per annum, unsecured, with quarterly interest payments due commencing February 2015Securities and the note maturing in November 2015. Interest on this note was paid for the first 6 months, then the accrued interest was added to the principal and a new note was entered into on November 18, 2015, for a period of one year. This note along with the balanceExchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the note referenced in (j) was converted to 1,503 shares of Series A General Common Shares that were Treasury Shares owned by the Company on December 31, 2015.Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

46

 

(e) Unsecured advances from related party Goldenhawk. This note was converted to Series A General Common Shares that were Treasury Shares owned by the Company (see (h)) on December 31, 2015.

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, Ecoark outsourced the accounting and finance function to Landis & Associates PLLC. Landis & Associates PLLC (“Landis PLLC”) is a professional limited liability company which is licensed as an Arkansas certified public accounting firm and is wholly owned by Greg Landis, our director and secretary. All payments to Landis PLLC were for accounting and finance work performed for Ecoark and its subsidiaries. In December 2015, Ecoark hired additional accounting staff and discontinued using the services provided by Landis PLLC.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities with the SEC on a timely basis. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments to these forms furnished to us, we believe all parties subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act filed on a timely basis all such required reports during and with respect to our 2015 fiscal year.

38

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTPRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

 

The following table provides information as of July 1, 2016,June 25, 2020, concerning beneficial ownership of our capital stock held by (1) each of our directors, (2) each of our named executive officers, (3) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group, and (4) each group, person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, (2) each of our directors, (3) each of our named executive officers, and (4) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.securities. Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Percentages are calculated based on 36,021,21098,606,884 shares of our common stock outstanding on July 1, 2016. The address for our officers and directors is 3333 Pinnacle Hills Parkway, Suite 220, Rogers, Arkansas 72758.as of June 25, 2020.

 

Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership  Percentage Voting Power 
Randy S. May  5,500,000   15.3%
Greg Landis  505,248   1.4%
Gary Metzger (1)  3,673,043   10.2%
Dr. Ashok Sood (2)  128,428   * 
Dr. Yash R. Puri  140,540   * 
Terrence D. Matthews (3)  130,000   * 
John P. Cahill  -   * 
Charles Rateliff  -   * 
Total Directors and Officers (8 persons)  10,077,259   27.9%
         
5% Holders        
The Hames Family Trust (4)  2,050,000   5.7%
         
Total  12,127,259   33.6%

(1) Includes 2,500 warrants with an exercise priceThe amounts and percentages of $5.00 per share.

(2) Includes 126,606common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares owned by Dr. Sood and 1,822 shares owned by his wife.

(3) Consists“voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of the security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities held by the Matthews Family Revocable Trust. Includes 65,000 warrants with an exercise price of $5.00 per share.

(4) Danny R. Hames is the trusteewhich that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of The Hames Family Trust, theJune 25, 2020. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the securities.

* Less than 1%.same securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which that person has no economic interest.

 

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

We currently have two classes of outstanding equity securities,Except as more fully described below.

Common Stock

Holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to: (i) one vote per share on all matters requiring a shareholder vote; (ii) a ratable distribution of dividends, ifotherwise noted, the persons and when, declared by our Board of Directors; and (iii)entities listed in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Ecoark Holdings,table below have sole voting and investing power with respect to share ratable in all assets remaining after all of our indebtedness has been provided for or satisfied. Holders of Common Stock do not have preemptive rights to acquire any of our additional, unissued or treasury shares or our securities convertible into or carrying a right to subscribe for or acquire our shares of capital stock. Holders of Common Stock are not entitled to cumulative voting.

As of July 1, 2016, 36,021,210 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.

Preferred Stock

Our authorized capital also consists of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001. The unissued preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series, and our Board of Directors is authorized to issue such stock in one or more series and to fix from time to time the number of shares to be included in any series and the designations, powers, preferences and relative, participating, option or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of all shares of such series.

Options

As of July 1, 2016, there are options outstanding that have been issued to our officers, directors, employees and independent contractors to purchase 659,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the Ecoark, Inc. 2013 Stock Option Plan.

Registration Rights

In connection with the Private Offering, we granted registration rights to the purchasers of our securities in the Private Offering. Pursuant to the terms of this Private Offering, we are required to file a registration statement with the SEC that covers all of the securities sold in the Public Offering.

Anti-takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

Our certificate of incorporation contains provisions that could make it more difficult to acquire control of our company by means of a tender offer, open market purchases, a proxy contest or otherwise. A description of these provisions is set forth below.

39

Preferred Stock

We believe that the availability of the preferred stock under our certificate of incorporation provides us with flexibility in addressing corporate issues that may arise. Having these authorized shares available for issuance allows us to issue shares of preferred stock without the expense and delay of a special stockholders’ meeting. The authorized shares of preferred stock, as well as shares of common stock, will be available for issuance without further action by our stockholders, unless action is required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange on which our securities may be listed. The Board of Directors has the power, subject to applicable law, to issue series of preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of the series, impede the completion of a merger, tender offer or other takeover attempt that some, or a majority, of the stockholders might believe to be in their best interests or in which stockholders might receive a premium for their stock over the then prevailing market price of the stock.

Special Meetings of Stockholders

Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of the Board or the President.

Anti-takeover Effects of Nevada Law

Business Combinations

The “business combination” provisions of Sections 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, of the Nevada Revised Statutes, or NRS, prohibit a Nevada corporation with at least 200 stockholders from engaging in various “combination” transactions with any interested stockholder: for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the transaction is approved by the board of directors prior to the date the interested stockholder obtained such status; or after the expiration of the three-year period, unless:

-the transaction is approved by the board of directors or a majority of the voting power held by disinterested stockholders, or
-if the consideration to be paid by the interested stockholder is at least equal to the highest of: (a) the highest price per share paid by the interested stockholder within the three years immediately preceding the date of the announcement of the combination or in the transaction in which it became an interested stockholder, whichever is higher, (b) the market value per share of common stock on the date of announcement of the combination and the date the interested stockholder acquired the shares, whichever is higher, or (c) for holders of preferred stock, the highest liquidation value of the preferred stock, if it is higher.

A “combination” is defined to include mergers or consolidations or any sale, lease exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition, in one transaction or a series of transactions, with an “interested stockholder” having: (a) an aggregate market value equal to 5% or more of the aggregate market value of the assets of the corporation, (b) an aggregate market value equal to 5% or more of the aggregate market value of all outstanding shares of the corporation, or (c) 10% or more of the earning power or net income of the corporation. 

In general, an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or within three years, did own) 10% or more of a corporation’s voting stock. The statute could prohibit or delay mergers or other takeover or change in control attempts and, accordingly, may discourage attempts to acquire our company even though such a transaction may offer our stockholders the opportunity to sell their stock at a price above the prevailing market price.

Control Share Acquisitions

The “control share” provisions of Sections 78.378 to 78.3793, inclusive, of the NRS, which apply only to Nevada corporations with at least 200 stockholders, including at least 100 stockholders of record who are Nevada residents, and which conduct business directly or indirectly in Nevada, prohibit an acquirer, under certain circumstances, from voting its shares of a target corporation’s stock after crossing certain ownership threshold percentages, unless the acquirer obtains approval of the target corporation’s disinterested stockholders. The statute specifies three thresholds: one-fifth or more but less than one-third, one-third but less than a majority, and a majority or more, of the outstanding voting power. Once an acquirer crosses one of the above thresholds, those shares in an offer or acquisition and acquired within 90 days thereof become “control shares” and such control shares are deprived of the right to vote until disinterested stockholders restore the right. These provisions also provide that if control shares are accorded full voting rights and the acquiring person has acquired a majority or more of all voting power, all other stockholders who do not vote in favor of authorizing voting rights to the control shares are entitled to demand payment for the fair value of their shares in accordance with statutory procedures established for dissenters’ rights.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Our independent stock transfer agent is Island Stock Transfer, Inc., 15500 Roosevelt Blvd., Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida  33760. Phone (727) 289-0010.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable. Except as otherwise set forth below, the address of the beneficial owner is c/o Ecoark Holdings, Inc., 5899 Preston Road #505, Frisco, Texas, 75034.

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership  Percent 
Randy S. May      3,050,000   3.1%
John P. Cahill (1)      1,284,021   1.3%
Peter Mehring (2)      2,441,254   2.5%
Gary Metzger (3)      4,293,796   4.43%
Steven K. Nelson (3)      490,825   0.5%
William B. Hoagland      2,750,000   2.8%
Jay Puchir (5)      4,214,057   4.3%
Directors & Executive Officers as a Group (7 persons)      18,523,953   18.8%
         
5% or Greater Stockholders:            
Nepsis Capital Management, Inc. (5)      12,596,486   12.8%

Notes:

(1)Includes 4,591 shares held by the Pataki-Cahill Group, LLC, 868,612 shares of common stock from Banner Energy Services Corp, and options to purchase 409,818 shares.
(2)Includes vested options to purchase 603,750 shares.
(3)Includes options to purchase 455,075 shares.
(4)Includes options to purchase 450,000 shares, as well as the control of 1,000,000 shares held by Banner Energy Services Corp, and 2,739,726 shares of common stock.
(5)The address to this shareholder is 8692 Eagle Creek Circle, Minneapolis, MN 55378. Based solely upon the information contained in a Schedule 13D filed on January 24, 2019. According to that Schedule 13D, Nepsis Capital Management, Inc. disclaims all dispositive power and voting power over all reported shares.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Existing Equity Compensation Plans

On October 11, 2018, the Company filed a Form S-8 amending the Company’s 2017 Equity incentive plan, described in detail in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Meeting filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2017. The amendment authorized an additional 5,000,000 shares to be added to the 2017 Equity incentive plan pool.

The Company does not have any individual compensation arrangements with respect to its common or preferred stock. The issuance of any of our common or preferred stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, which has the power to issue any or all of our authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval.

47

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Board of Directors has adopted a written policy regarding the review and approval of any related party transaction required to be disclosed under SEC rules. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the review and approval of transactions covered by the policy. As provided in the policy, in reviewing the proposed transaction, the Audit Committee will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including without limitation the commercial reasonableness of the terms, the benefit and perceived benefit, or lack thereof, to the Company, opportunity costs of alternate transactions, the materiality and character of the related party’s direct or indirect interest, and the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related party.

The Audit Committee will not approve or ratify a related party transaction unless it will have determined that, upon consideration of all relevant information, the proposed transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Except as noted below, there were no commercial transactions between related parties and the Company that required disclosure in this Proxy Statement.

There were no transactions occurring since April 1, 2018, or that are currently proposed, (i) in which the Company was or is to be a participant, (ii) where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and (iii) in which the Company’s executive officers, directors, principal stockholders and other related parties had a direct or indirect material interest, except the following:

Gary Metzger advanced $328 to the Company through March 31, 2020, under the terms of a note payable that bears 10% simple interest per annum, and the principal balance along with accrued interest is payable July 30, 2020 or upon demand. Interest expense on the note for the year ended March 31, 2020 was $27. In addition, the Company assumed $250 in notes entered into in March 2020 via the acquisition of Banner Midstream from the same board member at 15% interest.

The Company issued 8,945 shares of common stock (which Banner Parent issued to certain of its noteholders) and assumed $11,774 in debt and lease liabilities of Banner Midstream. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and another director, John Cahill, recused themselves from all board discussions on the acquisition of Banner Midstream as they are stockholders and/or noteholders of Banner Midstream. The transaction was approved by all of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Chairman and CEO of Banner Parent is a former officer of the Company and is currently the Principal Accounting Officer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer and President of Banner Midstream. Included in the shares issued in this transaction, John Cahill received 821,918 shares of common stock and Jay Puchir received 2,739,726 shares of common stock.

Other Transactions

We have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers that, among other things, provide for certain severance and change of control benefits. For a description of these agreements, see “Executive Compensation—Executive Employment Arrangements.”

We have granted stock options to our executive officers. Pursuant to our outside director compensation policy, we have paid cash compensation and granted restricted stock units to our non-employee directors. For a description of these arrangements, see “Executive Compensation.”

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers.

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

All future transactions between us and our officers, directors or five percent stockholders, and respective affiliates will be on terms no less favorable than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties and will be approved by a majority of our independent directors who do not have an interest in the transactions and who had access, at our expense, to our legal counsel or independent legal counsel.

48

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

The following is a summary of the rights of our capital stock, certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws as they became in effect upon completion of our initial public offering and applicable law. This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement and are incorporated by reference to our registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

Capital Stock

Our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 5,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.

Common Stock

As of July 1, 2020, we have 98,606 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. As of July 1, 2020, we had 101,393 shares of common stock available for issuance. Further, out of the unissued shares of common stock, as of July 1, 2020, we have unexercised options for 11,756 shares. Up to 7,593 shares may be issued upon the exercise of warrants. All shares in this paragraph are represented in thousands.

Under the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors, and do not have cumulative voting rights. The holders of outstanding shares of common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of assets or funds legally available for the payment of dividends of such times and in such amounts as our board of directors from time to time may determine. Our common stock is not entitled to pre-emptive rights and is not subject to conversion or redemption. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company, the assets legally available for distribution to stockholders are distributable ratably among the holders of our common stock after payment of liquidation preferences, if any, on any outstanding payment of other claims of creditors. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to and may be adversely affected by the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that we may designate and issue in the future.

Preferred Stock

On November 11, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), the Company and two institutional accredited investors (each an “Investor” and, collectively, the “Investors”) entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the Investors an aggregate of 1,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), at a price of $1,000 per share (the “Private Placement”). Each share of the Series C Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $1,000 (the “Stated Value”) and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $0.725, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

Our board of directors may, among other rights, determine, without further vote or action by our stockholders:

the number of shares constituting the series and the distinctive designation of the series;
the dividend rate on the shares of the series, whether dividends will be cumulative, and if so, from which date or dates, and the relative rights of priority, if any, of payment of dividends on shares of the series;
whether the series will have voting rights in addition to the voting rights provided by law and, if so, the terms of the voting rights;
whether the series will have conversion privileges and, if so, the terms and conditions of conversion;
whether or not the shares of the series will be redeemable or exchangeable, and, if so, the dates, terms and conditions of redemption or exchange, as the case may be;
whether the series will have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of that series, and, if so, the terms and amount of the sinking fund; and
the rights of the shares of the series in the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up and the relative rights or priority, if any, of payment of shares of the series.

Although we presently have no plans to issue any shares of preferred stock upon completion of the offering, any future issuance of shares of preferred stock, or the issuance of rights to purchase preferred shares, could, among other things, decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to the holders of common stock or could adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the holders of the common stock.

Options

As of July 1, 2020, we had outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 11,755,423 shares of our common stock, with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.00 per share.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent of our common stock is Philadelphia Stock Transfer, located at 2320 Haverford Road, Suite 230, Ardmore, Pennsylvania 19003.

49

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

Each Selling Stockholder (the “Selling Stockholders”) of the securities and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their securities covered hereby on the principal Trading Market or any other stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the securities are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. A Selling Stockholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling securities:

ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the securities as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

privately negotiated transactions;

settlement of short sales;

in transactions through broker-dealers that agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such securities at a stipulated price per security;

through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;

a combination of any such methods of sale; or

any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The Selling Stockholders may also sell securities under Rule 144 or any other exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), if available, rather than under this prospectus.

Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.

In connection with the sale of the securities or interests therein, the Selling Stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Stockholders may also sell securities short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge the securities to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or create one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of securities offered by this prospectus, which securities such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

The Selling Stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the securities may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the securities purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Each Selling Stockholder has informed the Company that it does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the securities.

The Company is required to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by the Company incident to the registration of the securities. The Company has agreed to indemnify the Selling Stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

50

We agreed to keep this prospectus effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the securities may be resold by the Selling Stockholders without registration and without regard to any volume or manner-of-sale limitations by reason of Rule 144, without the requirement for the Company to be in compliance with the current public information under Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect or (ii) all of the securities have been sold pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect. The resale securities will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale securities covered hereby may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale securities may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of the common stock by the Selling Stockholders or any other person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the Selling Stockholders and have informed them of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).

LEGAL MATTERS

Certain legal matters with respect to the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by our counsel, Carmel, Milazzo & DiChiaraFeil LLP, New York, New York.

EXPERTS

KBL,

The financial statements of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. as of March 31, 2020 and 2019 and for each of the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 have been audited by RBSM, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited Magnolia Solar’s and Ecoark’sas stated in their report appearing herein. Such financial statements at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015, as set forth in their report. We haveare included our financial statements in this prospectus and elsewhere in this registration statement in reliance on KBL, LLP’supon the report given on theirof RBSM, LLP, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

40

 

ADDITIONALWHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of our common stock and warrants offered byin this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of thatthe registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the accompanyingand its exhibits and schedules. Some items included in the registration statement areschedules, portions of which have been omitted from this prospectus in accordance withas permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information with respect toabout us and theour common stock, offered in this prospectus, we refer you to the registration statement and the accompanyingto its exhibits and schedules. Statements contained in this prospectus regardingabout the contents of any contract, agreement or any other document are summariesnot necessarily complete and, in each instance, we refer you to the copy of the material terms of these contracts, agreementssuch contract, agreement or other documents. With respect to each of these contracts, agreements or other documentsdocument filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, with each such statement being qualified in all respects by reference is made to such exhibit for a more complete description of the matter involved.

Adocument to which it refers. Anyone may inspect and copy of the registration statement and the accompanyingits exhibits and schedules and any other document we file may be inspected without charge and copied at the SEC’s public reference roomPublic Reference Room the SEC maintains at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The publicYou may obtain further information onabout the operation of the public reference roomSEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxyYou may also inspect the registration statement and information statementsits exhibits and schedules and other information regarding registrants that file electronically withwithout charge at the website maintained by the SEC. The address of the SEC’s websitethis site is http://www.sec.gov.

 

We are subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and we file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These periodic reports, proxy statements and other information are available for inspection and copying at the public reference room and website of the SEC referred to above. Wealso maintain a website at www.ecoarkusa.com. You will be able towww.zestlabs.com, at which you may access our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, proxy statements and other information to be filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC filings free of charge at our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material will bethey are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The information contained in, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference in, and is not part of, this prospectus. You may also request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing to us at Ecoark Holdings, Inc., 5899 Preston Road #505, Frisco, Texas, 75034.

 

41

51

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014; MARCH 31, 20162020

 

Table of Contents

 

Magnolia Solar Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirmsF-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014F-4
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7

Ecoark, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-27
Balance SheetsF-28F-3
Statements of OperationsF-29F-4
StatementsStatement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)F-30F-5
Statements of Cash FlowsF-31F-6
Notes to Financial StatementsF-32

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016(Unaudited)

Balance Sheets

F-47
Statements of OperationsF-48
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

F-49

Statements of Cash FlowsF-50
Notes to Financial StatementsF-51

Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC Financial Statements for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-64
Balance SheetsF-65
Statements of OperationsF-66
Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity (Deficit)F-67
Statements of Cash FlowsF-68
Notes to Financial StatementsF-69

Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 (Unaudited)

Balance SheetsF-75
Statements of OperationsF-76
Statements of Cash FlowsF-77
Notes to Financial StatementsF-78

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. Pro Forma Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited Proforma Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2016F-86
Unaudited Proforma Consolidated Statement of OperationsF-7Three Months Ended March 31, 2016F-87
Unaudited Proforma Consolidated Statement of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2015F-88
Notes to Unaudited Proforma Consolidated Financial StatementsF-89F-39

 

F-1

F-1

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Audit Committee and Board of Directors of

Magnolia Solar CorporationEcoark Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Magnolia Solar CorporationEcoark Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of DecemberMarch 31, 20152020 and 2014,2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficitstockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. in the two-year period ended March 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two-year ended March 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Change in Accounting Principles

As discussed the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as amended, effective April 1, 2019.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Wemisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were notwe engaged to perform, an audit of the Company’sits internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audits, included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Magnolia Solar Corporation as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is in process of completing a merger with another entity while they are continuing their development of their thin film solar cell technology and has incurred substantial losses as a result of this. The lack of profitable operations raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in this regard are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The consolidated financial statements were restated to reflect the retroactive treatment of the Company’s common stock in accordance with SAB Topic 4:C. This restatement had no effect on the Company’s net loss or total stockholders’ deficit.

KBL,/s/ RBSM LLP

 

/s/ KBL, LLPWe have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.

New York, NYLarkspur, California

February 26, 2016, except for Note 12 which is dated June 15, 201629, 2020

 

F-2

F-2

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBERAS OF MARCH 31 2015 AND 2014

 

  DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31, 
  2015  2014 
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $45,870  $25,127 
Accounts receivable  10,513   185,455 
Prepaid expense  -   1,417 
Total current assets  56,383   211,999 
         
Fixed assets, net  311   623 
         
OTHER ASSETS        
License with related party, net of accumulated amortization  83,183   118,833 
Total other assets  83,183   118,833 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $139,877  $331,455 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $682,029  $578,810 
Current portion of Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note, net of discount  2,400,000   2,400,000 
Total current liabilities  3,082,029   2,978,810 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES  3,082,029   2,978,810 
         
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT        
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 189,737 and 158,909 shares issued and outstanding (Restated)  190   159 
Additional paid-in capital (Restated)  2,539,048   2,267,935 
Additional paid-in capital - warrants  962,297   962,297 
Accumulated deficit  (6,443,687)  (5,877,746)
Total stockholders' deficit  (2,942,152)  (2,647,355)
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT $139,877  $331,455 
  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 
  2020  2019 
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash ($85 and $35 pledged as collateral for credit as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively) $406  $244 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $500 and $573 as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  172   520 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  676   900 
Current assets held for sale – (Note 2)  -   23 
Total current assets  1,254   1,687 
NON-CURRENT ASSETS        
Property and equipment, net  3,965   824 
Intangible assets, net  2,350   - 
Goodwill  10,225   - 
Right of use assets  731   - 
Oil and gas properties, full cost method  6,135   - 
Non-current assets held for sale – (Note 2)  249   - 
Other assets  7   27 
Total non-current assets  23,662   851 
TOTAL ASSETS $24,916  $2,538 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable $751  $1,416 
Accrued liabilities  3,036   828 
Due to prior owners  2,358   - 
Current portion of long-term debt  6,401   1,350 
Notes payable – related parties  2,172   - 
Derivative liabilities  2,775   3,104 
Current portion of lease liability  222   - 
Current liabilities of discontinued operations  228   - 
Current liabilities held for sale – (Note 2)  -   34 
Total current liabilities  17,943   6,732 
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Lease liability, net of current portion  510     
Long-term debt, net of current portion  421   - 
Asset retirement obligation  295   - 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
Total liabilities  19,169   6,732 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Numbers of shares rounded to thousands)        
         
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; 1 and 0 (Series C) issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000 and 100,000 shares authorized, 85,876 shares issued and 85,291 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2020 and 52,571 shares issued and 51,986 outstanding as of March 31, 2019  86   53 
Additional paid-in-capital  135,355   113,310 
Accumulated deficit  (128,023)  (115,886)
Treasury stock, at cost  (1,671)  (1,671)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  5,747   (4,194)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $24,916  $2,538 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.statements

 

F-3

F-3

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THEFISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBERMARCH 31 2015 AND 2014

 

  YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2015
  YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2014
 
       
REVENUE – net $159,882  $218,270 
         
COST OF REVENUES  102,069   135,356 
         
GROSS PROFIT  57,813   82,914 
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Indirect and administrative labor  160,483   198,800 
Professional fees  150,179   138,260 
Depreciation and amortization expense  35,962   35,962 
General and administrative  37,145   43,629 
Total operating expenses  383,769   416,651 
         
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE        
Interest expense  239,985   239,981 
Total other (income) expense  239,985   239,981 
         
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (565,941)  (573,718)
         
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  -   - 
         
NET LOSS $(565,941) $(573,718)
         
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING (RESTATED)  171,932   149,880 
         
NET LOSS PER SHARE (RESTATED) $(3.29) $(3.83)
  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 
  2020  2019 
       
CONTINUING OPERATIONS:      
REVENUES (Note 4) $581  $1,062 
         
COST OF REVENUES  259   699 
         
GROSS PROFIT  322   363 
OPERATING EXPENSES:        
Salaries and salary related costs, including non-cash share-based compensation of $2,124 and $2,722 for 2020 and 2019, respectively (Note 11)  3,668   4,848 
Professional fees and consulting, including non-cash share-based compensation of $1,692 and $405 for 2020 and 2019, respectively (Note 11)  2,333   1,315 
Other selling, general and administrative  1,370   1,671 
Depreciation, amortization, and impairment  286   3,357 
Research and development  2,472   3,320 
Total operating expenses  10,129   14,511 
Loss from continuing operations before other expenses  (9,807)  (14,148)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):        
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (369)  3,160 
Loss on exchange of warrants for common stock  (2,099)  - 
Gain on conversion of credit facility  541   - 
Gain on sale of equipment  17   - 
Interest expense, net of interest income  (422)  (417)
Total other income  (2,332)  2,743 
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (12,139)  (11,405)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:        
Loss from discontinued operations   (- )   (2,300)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations  2   57 
Total discontinued operations  2   (2,243)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  -   (2)
NET LOSS $(12,137) $(13,650)
         
NET LOSS PER SHARE        
Basic and diluted: Continuing operations $(0.18) $(0.23)
Discontinued operations $(0.00) $(0.04)
Total $(0.18) $(0.27)
         
SHARES USED IN CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE        
Basic and diluted  64,054   51,010 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.statements

 

F-4

F-4

 

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITSTOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBERMARCH 31, 20152020 AND 20142019

(Dollar amounts and number of shares in thousands)

 

         Additional  Additional       
  Common Stock   Paid-In  Paid-In       
  (Restated)  Capital  Capital -  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  (Restated)  Warrants  Deficits  Total 
                   
Balance - December 31, 2013  135,341  $135  $1,991,275  $962,297  $(5,304,028) $(2,350,321)
                         
Common shares issued for payment of interest  22,546   23   239,977   -   -   240,000 
                         
Common shares issued for services rendered  1,022   1   8,999   -   -   9,000 
                         
Stock based compensation  -   -   27,684   -   -   27,684 
                         
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2014  -   -   -   -   (573,718)  (573,718)
                         
Balance - December 31, 2014  158,909   159   2,267,935   962,297   (5,877,746)  (2,647,355)
                         
Common shares issued for payment of interest  30,828   31   239,969   -   -   240,000 
                         
Common shares issued for services rendered  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                         
Stock based compensation  -   -   31,144   -   -   31,144 
                         
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015  -   -   -   -   (565,941)  (565,941)
                         
Balance - December 31, 2015  189,737  $190  $2,539,048  $962,297  $(6,443,687) $(2,942,152)
  Preferred  Common  Additional
Paid-In-
  Accumulated  Treasury    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Stock  Total 
Balances at March 31, 2018  -  $        -   49,468  $49  $108,585  $(102,236) $(1,618) $4,780 
                                 
Shares issued for cash in private placement, net of expenses  -   -   2,969   3   1,648   -   -   1,651 
                                 
Share-based compensation – options – Board of Directors  -   -   -   -   400   -   -   400 
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock – services rendered  -   -   -   -   (14)  -   -   (14)
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock, options – employees  -   -   134   1   2,691   -   -   2,692 
                                 
Purchase shares from employees in lieu of taxes  -   -   -   -   -   -   (53)  (53)
                                 
Net loss for the period  -   -   -   -   -   (13,650)  -   (13,650)
                                 
Balances at March 31, 2019  -   -   52,571   53   113,310   (115,886)  (1,671)  (4,194)
                                 
Shares issued in acquisition of Trend Holdings  -   -   5,500   5   3,232   -   -   3,237 
                                 
Shares issued in the exercise of warrants, net of adjustments to derivative liabilities  -   -   6,520   6   5,473   -   -   5,479 
                                 
Shares issued in exercise of warrants for cash  -   -   3,922   4   1,996   -   -   2,000 
                                 
Shares issued for services rendered  -   -   802   1   716   -   -   717 
                                 
Shares issued in conversion of debt and accrued interest  -   -   3,855   4   2,271   -   -   2,275 
                                 
Shares issued in acquisition of Banner Midstream  -   -   8,945   9   4,857   -   -   4,866 
                                 
Shares issued for cash (Series B), net of expenses and adjustments to derivative liabilities  2   -   --   -   405   -   -   405 
                                 
Shares issued for cash (Series C), net of expenses and adjustments to derivative liabilities  1   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                 
Conversion of preferred shares (Series B) to common shares  (2)  -   3,761   4   (4)  -   -   - 
                                 
Stock based compensation  -   -   -   -   3,099   -   -   3,099 
                                 
Net loss for the period  -   -       -   -   (12,137)  -   (12,137)
                                 
Balances at March 31, 2020  1  $-   85,876  $86  $135,355  $(128,023) $(1,671) $5,747 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.statements

 

F-5

F-5

 

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

FOR THEFLOWS
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBERMARCH 31 2015 AND 2014

 

  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net loss $(565,941) $(573,718)
         
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization expense  35,962   35,962 
Stock based compensation  31,144   27,684 
Common stock issued for services rendered  -   9,000 
Common stock issued for payment of interest  240,000   240,000 
         
Change in assets and liabilities:        
Decrease in accounts receivable  174,942   41,170 
Decrease in prepaid expenses  1,417   - 
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses  103,219   126,857 
Total adjustments  586,684   480,673 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  20,743   (93,045)
         
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  20,743   (93,045)
         
CASH - BEGINNING OF YEAR  25,127   118,172 
         
CASH - END OF YEAR $45,870  $25,127 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid during the period for:        
Interest $-  $- 
Income taxes $912  $1,222 
         
NON-CASH SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:        
Stock issued for services rendered $-  $9,000 
Stock issued for payment of interest $240,000  $240,000 
Stock based compensation $31,144  $27,684 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2020  2019 
       
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss $(12,137)  $(13,650) 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation, amortization and impairment  286   3,357 
Gain on sale of assets  (17)  - 
Bad debt expense  -   486 
Interest expense on warrant derivative liabilities  107   - 
Share-based compensation - services rendered  717   400 
Share-based compensation - employees  3,099   2,673 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  369   (3,160)
Gain on exchange of warrants  2,099   - 
Gain on conversion of debt  (541)  - 
Commitment fee on credit facility  38   - 
Adjusted loss from discontinued operations  -   1,848 
Gain on sale of discontinued operations  -   (57)
Loss on retirement of assets  -   5 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  475   1,611 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  537   (36)
Other assets  21   (26)
Accounts payable  (838)  (934)
Accrued liabilities  329   291 
Deferred revenue  (23)  - 
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations  (5,479)  (7,192)
Net cash used in discontinued operations  (11)  (1,848)
Net cash used in operating activities  (5,490)  (9,040)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations  -   825 
Purchases of property and equipment  -   (289)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets  17   - 
Cash acquired in acquisition of Trend Discovery  3   - 
Cash acquired in acquisition of Banner Midstream  205   - 
Investment in Banner Midstream (pre-acquisition)  (1,000)  - 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (775)  536 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, net of fees  -   4,221 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrants, net of fees  2,980   - 
Proceeds from the exercise of warrants into common stock  2,000   - 
Proceeds from credit facility  1,137   1,350 
Purchase of treasury shares from employees  -   (53)
Proceeds from notes payable – related parties  403   - 
Repayments of amounts due to prior owners  (4)  - 
Repayments of notes payable - related parties  (75)  - 
Repayments of debt  (14)  (500)
Net cash provided by financing activities  6,427   5,018 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  162   (3,486)
Cash and restricted cash - beginning of period  244   3,730 
Cash and restricted cash - end of period $406  $244 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:        
Cash paid for interest $295  $382 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $2 
         
SUMMARY OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:        
Assets and liabilities acquired via acquisition of companies:        
Acquisition of Trend Discovery:        
Other receivables $10  $- 
Goodwill $3,222  $- 
Other assets $1  $- 
Acquisition of Banner Midstream:        
Accounts receivable $110  $- 
Oil and gas receivables $7  $- 
Prepaid expenses $578  $- 
Property and equipment $3,426  $- 
Right of use assets $731  $- 
Oil and gas properties $6,135  $- 
Customer relationships $2,100  $- 
Non-compete agreements $250  $- 
Goodwill $7,003  $- 
Assets of discontinued operations $249  $- 
Accounts payable $268  $- 
Accrued expenses $1,721  $- 
Due to prior owners $2,362  $- 
Accrued interest $640  $- 
Other current liabilities $1  $- 
Lease liability $732  $- 
Liabilities of discontinued operations $228  $- 
Asset retirement obligation $295  $- 
Notes payable – related parties $1,844  $- 
Long-term debt $6,836  $- 
         
Conversion of long-term debt and accrued interest for common stock $2,275  $- 
Shares issued for warrant exercise and derivative liability $5,479  $- 
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock $4  $- 
Issuance of shares for prepaid services $247  $- 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-6

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Ecoark Holdings is a diversified holding company, incorporated in the state of Nevada on November 19, 2007. Ecoark Holdings has four wholly owned subsidiaries: Ecoark, Inc. (“Ecoark”), a Delaware corporation which is the parent of Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs”), 440IoT Inc., a Nevada corporation (“440IoT”), Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream” and Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”). Zest Labs, offers the Zest Fresh solution, a breakthrough approach to quality management of fresh food, specifically designed to help substantially reduce the $161 billion amount of food loss the U.S. experiences each year. Banner Midstream is engaged in oil and gas exploration, production and drilling operations on over 10,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Banner Midstream also provides transportation and logistics services and procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors. Trend Holdings invests in a select number of early stage startups each year as part of the fund’s Venture Capital strategy.

Trend Capital Management provides services and collects fees from entities including Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I. Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I invest in securities. Neither Trend Holdings nor Trend Capital Management invest in securities or have any role in the purchase of securities by Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I. In the near-term, Trend Discovery LP’s performance will be driven by its investment in Volans-i, a fully autonomous vertical takeoff and landing (“VTOL”) drone delivery platform. Trend Discovery LP currently owns approximately 1% of Volans-i and has participation rights to future financings to maintain its ownership at 1% indefinitely. More information can be found at flyvoly.com.

440IoT Inc. was incorporated in 2019 and is located near Boston, Massachusetts and is a software development and information solutions provider for cloud, mobile, and IoT (Internet of Things) applications.

On March 27, 2020, the Company and Banner Energy Services Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Banner Parent”), entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Banner Purchase Agreement”) to acquire Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”). Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and Banner Parent received shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Banner Midstream.

Banner Midstream has four operating subsidiaries: Pinnacle Frac Transport LLC (“Pinnacle Frac”), Capstone Equipment Leasing LLC (“Capstone”), White River Holdings Corp. (“White River”), and Shamrock Upstream Energy LLC (“Shamrock”). Pinnacle Frac provides transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations. Capstone procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors. These two operating subsidiaries of Banner Midstream are revenue producing entities White River and Shamrock are engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, and drilling operations on over 10,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ecoark Holdings and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “the Company”. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Ecoark Holdings is a holding company that holds 100% of Ecoark and Magnolia Solar. Ecoark holds 100% of Eco360, Pioneer Products (which owned 100% of Sable), Zest Labs.

In May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell key assets of Pioneer (including the assets of Sable) and Magnolia Solar. Both of these subsidiaries were sold in May 2019.

On May 31, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) for the Company to acquire 100% of Trend Holdings pursuant to a merger of Trend Holdings with and into the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed, and Trend Holdings is now included in the consolidated financial statements.

 

On March 27, 2020, the Company and Banner Energy Services Corp, a Nevada corporation (“Banner Parent”), entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Banner Purchase Agreement”) to acquire Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”). Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and Banner Parent received shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Banner Midstream.

F-6

F-7

 

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATIONECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2015 AND 20142020

 

Note 1 – Organization and Nature of Business

Magnolia Solar Corporation (the “Registrant”) through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Magnolia Solar, Inc. (“Magnolia Solar” and together with the Registrant, “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company”) is focused on developing and commercializing thin film solar cell technologies that employ nanostructured materials and designs.

The Company is pioneering the development of thin film, high efficiency solar cells for applications such as power generation for electrical grids as well as for local applications, including lighting, heating, traffic control, irrigation, water distillation, and other residential, agricultural and commercial uses.

The Company’s technology takes multiple approaches to bringing cell efficiencies close to those realized in silicon based solar cells while also lowering manufacturing costs. The technology uses a different composition of materials than those used by competing thin film cell manufacturers; incorporates additional layers of material to absorb a wider spectrum of light; uses inexpensive substrate materials, such as glass and polymers, lowering the cost of the completed cell compared to silicon based solar cells; and is based on non-toxic materials that do not have adverse environmental effects.

Since 2010, the Company filed a series of U.S. utility patents relating to the technologies under development.

Reverse Merger

On November 19, 2007, the Registrant, formerly known as Mobilis Relocation Services, Inc. (“Mobilis”), was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada. Mobilis formed Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in the State of Delaware. Mobilis filed a Certificate of Change to its Articles of Incorporation in order to affect a forward split of the number of authorized shares of common stock which they were authorized to issue, and of the then issued and outstanding shares in a ratio of 1.3157895:1. The forward split occurred in February 2010. All share and per share amounts have been reflected herein post-split.

On December 31, 2009, Mobilis entered into an Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement”) with Magnolia Solar, Inc., a privately held Delaware corporation incorporated on January 8, 2008, and Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corp. (“Acquisition Sub”). Upon closing of the transaction, under the Merger Agreement, Acquisition Sub merged with and into Magnolia Solar, and Magnolia Solar, as the surviving corporation, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mobilis. Thereafter, Mobilis changed its name to Magnolia Solar Corporation. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger, and the historical financial information is that of Magnolia Solar, Inc.

F-7

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 1 – Organization and Nature of Business (continued)

Going Concern

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has been generating revenues from various development contracts with governmental agencies; however the Company has generated losses totaling $565,941 and $573,718 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. While the Company raised funds in a private placement that it consummated in 2009 (raising $990,000 in $2,660,000 of Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (the “2009 Notes”)), at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, it had cash of $45,870 and $25,127, respectively, and will need to raise additional funds to carry out its business plan.

The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations.

On December 29, 2011, the 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,660,000 were amended. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment agreements, (i) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $260,000 converted into an aggregate of 4,160 shares of common stock of the Company at an adjusted conversion price of $62.50 per share, (ii) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 were amended to extend the maturity dates from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 and 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of the remaining $400,000 were amended to extend the maturity date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013, (iii) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 were amended to adjust the conversion price of such notes from $250.00 per share to $62.50 per share, (iv) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $400,000 were amended to provide that such notes shall, from January 1, 2012 onwards, bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum payable on a quarterly basis, upon conversion and at maturity and that such interest may, at the option of the Company, be paid in cash or in shares of common stock of the Company at the interest conversion rate of 90% of the volume weighted average price of the common stock of the Company during the 20 trading days prior to the interest payment date, (v) an aggregate of 5,200 shares of common stock of the Company were issued to certain holders of the 2009 Notes, and (vi) the exercise price of the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 13,541 shares of common stock was adjusted from $312.50 per share to $125.00 per share.

F-8

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 1 – Organization and Nature of Business (continued)

Going Concern (continued)

On December 21, 2012 and June 27, 2013 the 2009 Notes as described in the preceding paragraph were amended. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment agreements, (i) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 were amended to extend the maturity dates from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013, (ii) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 were amended to provide that such notes shall, from January 1, 2013 onwards, bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum payable on a quarterly basis, upon conversion and at maturity and that such interest may, at the option of the Company, be paid in cash or in shares of common stock of the Company at the interest conversion rate of 90% of the volume weighted average price of the common stock of the Company during the 20 trading days prior to the interest payment date, and (iii) the exercise price of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 13,541 shares of common stock was adjusted from $125.00 per share to $62.50 per share.

On December 29 and 31, 2013, the 2009 Notes as described in the preceding paragraphs were amended. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment agreements, (i) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,400,000 were amended to extend the maturity dates from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014, and (ii) the exercise price of the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 13,541 shares of common stock was adjusted from $62.50 per share to $25.00 per share. Additionally, the Company also agreed to extend the expiration date of the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,640 shares of common stock from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2016.

There can be no assurance that additional funds will be available when needed from any source or, if available, will be available on terms that are acceptable to the Company. If the Company were to default on its indebtedness, then holders of the notes may foreclose on the debt and seize the Company's assets which may force the Company to suspend or cease operations altogether. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

On January 29, 2016, the Company entered into a Merger Agreement with Ecoark, Inc. ("Ecoark") providing, among other things, for the acquisition of Ecoark by the Company in a share for share exchange pursuant to which it was contemplated that at the closing Ecoark shareholders would own approximately 95% of the outstanding shares of the Company. The Company filed a preliminary 14A Proxy Statement informing its shareholders of the Company’s intent to hold a shareholder meeting in order to vote on certain proposals to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase of the authorized shares of common stock to 100,000,000 shares, to effect the creation of 5,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock, to approve a reverse stock split of the common stock 1 for 250, and to change the name of the corporation to Ecoark Holdings Inc., the approval of which were conditions to closing the merger with Ecoark. The Company’s shareholders approved the proposals, and the merger was completed in March 2016. In accordance with SEC SAB Topic 4:C, the Company has given retroactive effect to the reverse split of the common stock 1 for 250 (see Note 12).

F-9

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 1 – Organization and Nature of Business (continued)

Going Concern (continued)

The Company may need to raise additional capital to expand operations to the point at which the Company can achieve profitability. The terms of equity or debt that may be raised may not be on terms acceptable by the Company. If adequate funds cannot be raised outside of the Company, the Company may suspend or cease operations altogether.

The development of renewable energy and energy efficiency marks a new era of energy exploration in the United States. The Company continues to explore low cost alternatives for energy solutions which are in line with United States government initiatives for renewable energy sources. The Company hopes that these factors will mitigate the current unstable factors in the United States economy.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Accounting

The financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation”Consolidation of the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8, the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.

The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the entities at December 31, 2015 as follows:

Name of consolidated
subsidiary or entity
State or other
jurisdiction of
incorporation or
organization
Date of incorporation
or formation
(date of acquisition,
if applicable)
Attributable interest
at December 31,
2015 and 2014
Magnolia Solar Inc.Delaware, U.S.A. January 8, 2008100%

All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

F-10

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounts Receivable

For financial reporting, current earnings are charged and an allowance is credited with a provision for doubtful accounts based on experience. Accounts deemed uncollectible are charged against this allowance. Receivables are reported on the balance sheet net of such allowance. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses. The Company believes no allowance for doubtful accounts is necessary at December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (from three to seven years). Additions, renewals, and betterments, unless of a minor amount, are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews their recoverability of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment will be based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fixed assets to be disposed of by sale will be carried at the lower of the then current carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. The Company’s management has determined that the fair value of long-lived assets exceeds the book value and thus no impairment charge is necessary as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, the carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments.

F-11

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes utilizing the liability method of accounting. Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on differences between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates in effect in years in which differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts that are expected to be realized.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized from private and public sector contracts that are time and material type contracts. These revenues are recognized in accordance with ASC 605,Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when; (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company assesses whether fees are fixed or determinable at the time of sale and recognizes revenue if all other revenue recognition requirements are met. The Company's standard payment terms are net 30 days. Payments that extend beyond 30 days from the contract date but that are due within twelve months are generally deemed to be fixed or determinable based on the Company's successful collection history on such arrangements, and thereby satisfy the required criteria for revenue recognition.

Revenue from inception to December 31, 2015 has been primarily from research and development grants or contracts to develop solar cells using the Company’s technology.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The Company follows ASC 740-10,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This interpretation requires recognition and measurement of uncertain income tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” approach. Management evaluates their tax positions on an annual basis. The Company’s policy is to recognize both interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits expected to result in payment of cash within one year are classified as accrued liabilities, while those expected beyond one year are classified as other liabilities. The Company has not recorded any interest or penalties since its inception.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction and various state tax jurisdictions. The tax years for 2012 to 2014 remain open for examination by federal and/or state tax jurisdictions. The Company is currently not under examination by any other tax jurisdictions for any tax year.

F-12

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Loss Per Share of Common Stock

Basic net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) include additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants. Common stock equivalents are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reports a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for periods presented. The following is a reconciliation of the computation for basic and diluted EPS:

   December 31,  December 31, 
   2015  2014 
          
 Net loss $(565,941) $(573,718)
          
 Restated Weighted-average common shares outstanding (Basic)  171,932   149,880 
          
 Weighted-average common stock        
 Equivalents        
 Stock options  9,800   6,921 
 Warrants  15,141   15,141 
          
 Weighted-average common shares outstanding (Diluted)  196,873   171,942 

Stock based compensation

The Company applies ASC No. 718 and ASC Subtopic No. 505-50,Equity-Based Payments to Non Employees, to options and other stock based awards issued to nonemployees. In accordance with ASC No. 718 and ASC Subtopic No. 505-50, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of the options at the measurement date.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

During August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern.” The provisions of ASU No. 2014-15 require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-13

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued)

During May 2014, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)". The objective of ASU 2014-09 is to (1) remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements, (2) provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, (3) improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets, (4) provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements, and (5) simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The effective date of this ASU was subsequently changed with the issuance of ASU 2015-14 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this standard on its financial statements.

There were other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 3 - Stockholders’ Deficit

The Company has 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 per share authorized.

Shares

Prior to the Reverse Merger as discussed in Note 1, the Company issued 17,895 shares of common stock between January and March 2008 at prices ranging from $2.50 to $5.00 per share for a total of $53,000 cash.

In accordance with the Reverse Merger, the Company cancelled 7,895 shares of common stock and issued 85,230 shares to the former shareholders of Magnolia Solar, Inc. As a result of these transactions, as of December 31, 2009, there were 95,320 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

The Company effectuated a 1.3157895 forward stock split in February 2010, in accordance with the Merger Agreement which resulted in 95,320 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

F-14

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 3 - Stockholders’ Deficit (continued)

Shares (continued)

In February 2014, the Company issued 4,196 shares of common stock at its fair value price ($15.00 per share) in lieu of interest payment for a value of $60,000.

In March 2014, the Company issued 379 shares of common stock for consulting services for a value of $4,500 at a fair market value price of $12.50 per share.

In April 2014, the Company issued 8,276 shares of common stock at its fair value price ($7.50 per share) in lieu of interest payment for a value of $60,000.

In April 2014, the Company issued 643 shares of common stock for consulting services for a value of $4,500 at a fair market value price of $7.50 per share.

In August 2014, the Company issued 5,275 shares of common stock at its fair value price ($12.50 per share) in lieu of interest payment for a value of $60,000.

In October 2014, the Company issued 4,800 shares of common stock at its fair value price ($12.50 per share) in lieu of interest payment for a value of $60,000.

In March 2015, the Company issued 4,781 shares of common stock at its fair value price ($12.50 per share) in lieu of interest payment for a value of $60,000.

In April 2015, the Company issued 6,138 shares of common stock at its fair value price ($10.00 per share) in lieu of interest payment for a value of $60,000.

In July 2015, the Company issued 6,575 shares of common stock at its fair value price ($10.00 per share) in lieu of interest payment for a value of $60,000.

In October 2015, the Company issued 13,333 shares of common stock at its fair value price ($5.00 per share) in lieu of interest payment for a value of $60,000.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had 189,737 shares issued and outstanding.

Warrants

Following the closing of the Reverse Merger in December 2009, the Company issued five-year callable warrants (the “2009 Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of 10,640 shares of common stock exercisable at $312.50 per share to investors in a private placement (the “2009 Private Placement”) and further issued seven year placement agent warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,901 shares of common stock exercisable at $262.50 per share. On December 29, 2011, the exercise price of both the 2009 Warrants and placement agent warrants was reduced to $125.00 per share.

F-15

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 3 - Stockholders’ Deficit (continued)

Warrants (continued)

On December 21, 2012, the exercise price of the 2009 Warrants and placement agent warrants were reduced to $62.50 per share. On December 23, 2013, the exercise price of the 2009 Warrants and placement agent warrants were further reduced to $25.00 per share. Additionally, the Company also agreed to extend the expiration date of the 2009 Warrants from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2016.

On August 15, 2011, the Company issued 1,600 warrants for public relations services. The warrants vest immediately, and are for a term of 5 years with a strike price of $125.00 per share. The warrants have been valued at $59,534 and are reflected in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014.

As of December 31, 2015, the following warrants are outstanding:

 Balance – December 31, 2008  -    
 Issued – in the 26.6 units  10,640  $25.00 
 Issued – to Placement Agent  2,901  $25.00 
 Balance – December 31, 2009  13,541  $25.00 
 Balance – December 31, 2010  13,541  $25.00 
 Issued – for public relations  1,600  $125.00 
 Balance – December 31, 2011  15,541  $35.00 
 Balance – December 31, 2012  15,541  $35.00 
 Balance – December 31, 2013  15,541  $35.00 
 Balance – December 31, 2014  15,541  $35.00 
 Balance – December 31, 2015  15,541  $35.00 

Stock Options

In May 2014, the Company granted 9,800 shares of common stock under the 2013 Incentive Stock Option Plan. Under the 2013 Plan, the Company may grant options to purchase up to 22,000 shares of common stock to be granted to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. The vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates will be established by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Company at the date of grant, but incentive stock options may be subject to earlier termination, as provided in the 2013 Plan. As of December 31, 2015, there were 9,343 shares available for future grant.

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using theBlack-Scholes option-pricing model.

F-16

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 3 - Stockholders’ Deficit (continued)

Stock Options (continued)

Expected volatility was calculated based upon the company’s observed median volatility. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon the United States Treasury Bond yield curve in effect at the time of grant for instruments with a similar expected life.

The Company recognized compensation cost related to stock-based compensation in the amount of $31,144, for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company has not recognized any tax benefits or deductions related to the effects of employee stock-based compensation.

In addition, as of December 31, 2015, approximately $10,382 was related to non-vested options which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.42 years.

No options were exercised under all share-based compensation arrangements for the period ending December 31, 2015.

The following is a summary of stock option activity under the Company's stock option plan:

   Number of Options/Shares  Range of Exercise Prices  Weighted- Average Exercise Price 
              
 Outstanding as of December 31, 2014  9,800  $12.50  $12.50 
 Options granted  -  $0.00  $0.00 
 Options exercised  -  $0.00  $0.00 
 Options forfeited/expired/cancelled  -  $0.00  $0.00 
 Outstanding as of December 31, 2015  9,800  $12.50  $12.50 
 Exercisable as of December 31, 2015  8,330  $12.50  $12.50 
 Exercisable as of December 31, 2014  3,920  $12.50  $12.50 

F-17

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 3 - Stockholders’ Deficit (continued)

Stock Options (continued)

Information about stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2015 is as follows:

 Exercise Price  Number of
Options
Outstanding
  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(years)
  Number of
Options
Exercisable
 
 $12.50   9,800   3.42   8,330 
      9,800   3.42   8,330 

Note 4 - Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

   December 31,  December 31, 
   2015  2014 
        
 Office equipment and computers $6,106  $6,106 
 Furniture and fixtures  2,182   2,182 
    8,288   8,288 
 Accumulated depreciation  (7,977)  (7,665)
          
   $311  $623 

The Company incurred $312 and $312, respectively, in depreciation expense for the periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Note 5 - License Agreement with Related Party

The Company has entered into a 10-year, renewable, exclusive license with Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc. (“Magnolia Optical”) on April 30, 2008 for the exclusive rights of the technology related to the application of Optical’s solar cell technology. Magnolia Optical shares common ownership with the Company.

The Company is amortizing the license fee of $356,500 over the 120 month term of the Agreement. Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $273,317 and $237,667, respectively. Amortization expense for each of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $35,650, respectively. The Company’s management has determined that the fair value of the license exceeds the book value and thus no further impairment or amortization is necessary as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

F-18

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 6 – Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note

Original Notes

Following the closing of the Reverse Merger in December 2009, the Company issued 26.6 units in the 2009 Private Placement consisting of an aggregate of $2,660,000 of 2009 Notes and 2009 Warrants exercisable into an aggregate of 10,640 shares of common stock exercisable at $312.50 per share, for $50,000 per unit for aggregate proceeds to the Company of $990,000. In addition, placement agent warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,901 shares of common stock exercisable at $262.50 per share were issued. The 2009 Notes are secured by a first-priority security interest in the assets of the Company. Holders of the 2009 Notes and warrants issued in the 2009 Private Placement also have the right to “piggyback” registration of the shares underlying the 2009 Notes and warrants.

Prior to the amendment and restatement of the 2009 Notes, the 2009 Notes were originally due December 31, 2011 and convertible at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion rate of $250.00 per share.

Amended Notes

On December 29, 2011, the Company entered into amendment agreements with holders of the 2009 Notes and 2009 Warrants. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment agreements, (i) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $260,000 were converted into an aggregate of 4,160 shares of common stock of the Company at an adjusted conversion price of $62.50 per share, (ii) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 were amended to extend the maturity dates from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 and 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of the remaining $400,000 were amended to extend the maturity date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013, (iii) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 were amended to adjust the conversion price of such notes from $250.00 per share to $62.50 per share, (iv) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $400,000 were amended to provide that such notes shall, from January 1, 2012 onwards, bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum payable on a quarterly basis, upon conversion and at maturity and that such interest may, at the option of the Company, be paid in cash or in shares of common stock of the Company at the interest conversion rate of 90% of the volume weighted average price of the common stock of the Company during the 20 trading days prior to the interest payment date, (v) an aggregate of 5,200 shares of common stock of the Company were issued to certain holders of the 2009 Notes, and (vi) the exercise price of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 13,540 shares of common stock was adjusted from $312.50 per share to $125.00 per share.

F-19

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 6 – Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note (continued)

Amended Notes (continued)

On December 21, 2012 and on June 27, 2013 the 2009 Notes as described in the preceding paragraph were amended. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment agreements, (i) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 were amended to extend the maturity dates from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013, (ii) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 were amended to provide that such notes shall, from January 1, 2013 onwards, bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum payable on a quarterly basis, upon conversion and at maturity and that such interest may, at the option of the Company, be paid in cash or in shares of common stock of the Company at the interest conversion rate of 90% of the volume weighted average price of the common stock of the Company during the 20 trading days prior to the interest payment date, and (iii) the exercise price of the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 13,541 shares of common stock was adjusted from $125.0 per share to $62.50 per share. Upon amendment of the notes, interest was calculated on the entire $2,400,000 of promissory notes at a rate of 10% per year. Interest expense was accrued in the amount of $60,000 per quarter and shares are issued in lieu of cash payments.

On December 29 and 31, 2013 the 2009 Notes as described in the preceding paragraph were amended. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment agreements, (i) 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $2,400,000 were amended to extend the maturity dates from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014, (ii) the exercise price of the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 13,541 shares of common stock was adjusted from $62.50 per share to $25.00 per share. Additionally, the Company also agreed to extend the expiration date of the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,640 shares of common stock from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2016.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company issued 75,180 shares of its common stock in lieu of interest payments in the aggregate of $700,000 relating to the 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal of $2,400,000.

As of December 31, 2015, the entire $2,400,000 balance of the amended 2009 Notes remains outstanding. In the transaction, the Company recognized a discount of $1,670,000 which was amortized over the original life of the 2009 Notes. The discount represented the original issue discount. In addition, the Company determined that the value of the warrants in the transaction of $412,830 as a discount to the 2009 Notes. This discount was being amortized as well over the original life of the 2009 Notes.

The 2009 Notes mature on June 30, 2016 (these notes were extended on January 29, 2016 and will convert to equity if the merger is completed - see Note 11).

As of December 31, 2015, $2,400,000 of the 2009 Notes are classified as a current liability and the amounts have not been repaid as of the issuance of these financial statements. The modifications made to the debt instruments did not constitute a material modification under ASC 470-50.

F-20

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 7 – Provision for Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are determined using the liability method for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are measured based on the tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences are included in the Company’s tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

As of December 31, 2015, there is no provision for income taxes, current or deferred.

    December 31, 2015 
 Net operating losses $1,371,196 
 Valuation allowance  (1,371,196)
   $

-

 

At December 31, 2015, the Company had a net operating loss carry forward in the amount of approximately $4,000,000 available to offset future taxable income through 2035. The Company established valuation allowances equal to the full amount of the deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of the utilization of the operating losses in future periods.

A reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate as a percentage of income before taxes and federal statutory rate for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is summarized below.

Federal statutory rate(34.0)%
State income taxes, net of federal0.0
Valuation allowance34.0
0.0%

F-21

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies

Office Lease

The Company leases office facilities located in Woburn, MA under a lease agreement that expires December 30, 2016. The Company leased additional office facilities at a second location in Albany, NY under a lease agreement that was canceled effective October 31, 2015. Rent expense for the Company’s facilities for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 totaled $15,009 and $18,143, respectively.

The future minimum lease payments due under the above mentioned non-cancelable lease agreement is as follows:

 Year ending December 31,    
 2016 $4,212 
   $4,212 

Contract Related Fees

As part of the contract to develop its products, the Company has agreed to pay the contractor 1.5% of future New York state manufactured sales, and 5% of future non-New York state manufactured sales until the entire funds paid by the contractor have been repaid, or 15 years, whichever comes first. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has $1,251,885 of contract related expenses, all of which will be owed to the contractor, contingent upon the sale of the Company’s product. The Company has not accrued a liability as management has determined that it is not probable sales will occur prior to the 15 year expiration of the obligation.

Note 9 - Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash in one bank deposit account, which at times may exceed the federally insured limits of $250,000 that exist through December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2015, the Company did not have any uninsured deposits.

F-22

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 9 - Concentration of Credit Risk (continued)

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. The Company extends credit based on the customers’ financial conditions. The Company does not require collateral or other security to support customer receivables. Credit losses, when realized, have been within the range of management’s expectations. To further reduce credit risk associated with accounts receivable, the Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers.

December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Concentrations in accounts receivable:
Customer A100%*
Customer B*60%
Customer C*40%

   December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Concentrations in net revenue:      
 Customer A  93%  90%

* Customer did not exceed 10% for the respective year.

Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements

The Company adopted certain provisions of ASC Topic 820. ASC 820 defines fair value, provides a consistent framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and expands fair value financial statement disclosure requirements. ASC 820’s valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company's Level 1 assets consist of cash and cash equivalents.
Level 2Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.  
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

F-23

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

 

December 31, 2015

            
   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
              
 Cash $45,870  $-  $-  $45,870 
 Total assets $45,870  $-  $-  $45,870 
 Original Issue Discount  Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes $-  $-  $2,400,000  $2,400,000 
 Total liabilities $-  $-  $2,400,000  $2,400,000 

 

December 31, 2014

            
   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
              
 Cash $25,127  $-  $-  $25,127 
 Total assets $25,127  $-  $-  $25,127 
 Original Issue Discount  Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes $-  $-  $2,400,000  $2,400,000 
 Total liabilities $-  $-  $2,400,000  $2,400,000 

F-24

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements (continued)

   Original Issue Discount Senior
Secured Convertible
Promissory
Notes
 
     
 Balance, January 1, 2014 $2,400,000 
 Realized gains (losses)  - 
  Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments still held at the reporting date - 
 Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net  - 
 Discount on notes  - 
 Amortization of discount on notes  - 
 Conversion of notes to common stock  - 
 Balance, December 31, 2014 $2,400,000 
 Realized gains (losses)  - 
 Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments still held at the reporting date  -
 Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net  - 
 Discount on notes  - 
 Amortization of discount on notes  - 
 Balance, December 31, 2015 $2,400,000 

F-25

MAGNOLIA SOLAR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

On January 19, 2016, the Company issued 6,283 shares of common stock for payment in lieu of cash of interest equal to $60,000.

On January 29, 2016, the Company entered into a Merger Agreement with Ecoark providing, among other things, for the acquisition of Ecoark by the Company in a share for share exchange pursuant to which it is contemplated that at the closing Ecoark shareholders will own approximately 95% of the outstanding share of the Company. The Company filed a 14A and is awaiting approval from the SEC on certain proposals to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase of the authorized shares of common stock to 100,000,000 shares, to effect the creation of 5,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock, to approve a reverse stock split of the common stock 1 for 250, and to change the name of the corporation to Ecoark Holdings Inc. Upon approval by the SEC, it is anticipated that the merger will be completed in March 2016. 

On January 29, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with holders of the Notes Payable as mentioned in Note 6 to extend the term of the note to June 30, 2016. The notes will convert to equity if the merger is completed.

Management has evaluated subsequent events for the disclosure and/or recognition in the financial statements through February 26, 2016 except Note 12 which is dated June 15, 2016, the date that the financial statements were issued.

Note 12 – Restatement of Financial Statements

On March 18, 2016, the Company effected the reverse stock split of its common stock by a ratio of 1 for 250 described in Note 11. In accordance with SEC SAB Topic 4:C, the Company has given retroactive effect to the reverse split by adjusting the number of shares in the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ deficit and accompanying notes. The retroactive treatment changed the reported common stock and additional paid-in capital in the balance sheets, the weighted average number of shares outstanding and resulting net loss per share in the statements of operations, the number of shares and related dollar amounts in the statement of changes in stockholders’ deficit, and various disclosures regarding number of shares and related amounts in these notes to consolidated financial statements.There was no effect on the net loss or total stockholders’ deficit as a result of the restatement.

The change became effective on March 18, 2016 when the reverse split was approved.

The merger with Ecoark described in Notes 1 and 11 was completed on March 24, 2016. 

F-26

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Directors of

EcoArk, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Rogers, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EcoArk, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of EcoArk, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has sustained operating losses and needs to obtain additional financing to continue the development of their products. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The consolidated financial statements were restated to reflect the retroactive treatment of the Company’s Class A, B, C, and D Common Shares in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 805-40-45. This restatement had no effect on the Company’s net loss or total stockholders’ equity (deficit).

/s/ KBL, LLP

New York, NY

March 28, 2016,except for Note 15 which is dated June 15, 2016

F-27

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

  (Dollars in thousands,
except per share, data)
 
  2015  2014 
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $1,962  $2,220 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance  972   884 
Inventory, net of reserves  743   903 
Prepaid expenses  161   151 
Related party receivable  -   100 
Other current assets  130   25 
Total current assets  3,968   4,283 
Property and equipment, net  363   462 
Intangible assets, net  852   1,904 
Other assets  25   - 
Total non-current assets  1,240   2,366 
TOTAL ASSETS $5,208  $6,649 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Current portion of long-term debt $3,175  $3,027 
Current portion of long-term debt - related parties  1,329   6,176 
Note payable – bank  -   250 
Accounts payable  1,074   967 
Accrued expenses  503   209 
Accrued interest  40   148 
Deferred revenue  -   142 
Total current liabilities  6,121   10,919 
         
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Long-term debt, net of current portion  -   171 
Long-term debt - related parties, net of current portion  -   3,111 
Total non-current liabilities  -   3,282 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  -   - 
Total liabilities  6,121   14,201 
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Numbers of shares rounded to thousands) (Restated)        
Series A General Common Shares - $0.001 par value; 38,000 shares authorized and issued, 17,229 and 12,300 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively  19   19 
Series B Common Shares - $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, 4,931 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively  5   5 
Series C Common Shares - $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized, 1,738 and 1,675 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively  2   2 
Series D Common Shares - $0.001 par value; 8,000 shares authorized, 3,723 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively  4   4 
Additional paid-in-capital  36,722   22,172 
Subscription receivable  (55)  (31)
Accumulated deficit  (36,587)  (26,085)
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,771 and 6,700 Series A General Common Shares as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively  (928)  (3,514)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) before non-controlling interest  (818)  (7,428)
Non-controlling interest  (95)  (124)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)  (913)  (7,552)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY  (DEFICIT) $5,208  $6,649 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-28


ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

  (Dollars in thousands,
except per share, data)
 
  2015  2014 
REVENUES   
Revenue from product sales $5,167  $4,378 
Revenue from services  2,701   1,639 
   7,868   6,017 
COST OF REVENUES        
Cost of product sales  4,960   4,298 
Cost of services  1,178   726 
   6,138   5,024 
GROSS PROFIT  1,730   993 
OPERATING EXPENSES:        
Salaries and salary related costs, including stock based compensation  3,791   2,836 
Professional fees and consulting  3,651   5,311 
General and administrative  1,636   1,630 
Depreciation and amortization  1,226   1,708 
Research and development  1,114   1,053 
Total operating expenses  11,418   12,538 
Loss from operations  (9,688)  (11,545)
         
OTHER EXPENSE:        
Interest expense, net of interest income  (785)  (1,270)
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes  (10,473)  (12,815)
         
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  -   - 
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS  (10,473)  (12,815)
         
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS        
Loss from discontinued operations  -   (1,449)
Gain (loss) on disposal  of operations  -   - 
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS  -   (1,449)
NET LOSS  (10,473)  (14,264)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST  29   (129)
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST $(10,502) $(14,135)
         
NET LOSS PER SHARE (RESTATED)        
Basic $(0.36) $(0.51)
Diluted $(0.36) $(0.51)
         
SHARES USED IN CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE (RESTATED)  (Number of shares in thousands) 
Basic  29,344   27,575 
Diluted  29,395   27,922 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-29

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014 (RESTATED)

(Dollar amounts and number of shares in thousand)                               
  Series A General Common  Series B Common  Series C Common  Series D Common  Additional Paid-In-  Subscription  Accumulated  Treasury  Non-controlling    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Receivable  Deficit  Stock  Interest  Total 
                                           
Balance at January 1, 2014  19,000  $19   4,931  $5   1,000  $1   890  $1  $13,872   -  $(11,950) $(994) $5  $959 
                                                         
Shares issued for cash, net of expenses  -   -   -   -   -   -   2,333   2   5,172  $(31)  -   -   -   5,143 
                                                         
Shares issued for services rendered  -   -   -   -   675   1   500   1   2,936   -   -   -   -   2,938 
                                                         
Repurchase of treasury shares  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,116)  -   (3,116)
                                                         
Re-issuance of treasury shares for company formation  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   28   -   28 
                                                         
Re-issuance of treasury shares for services rendered  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   568   -   568 
                                                         
Stock based compensation - options  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   192   -   -   -   -   192 
                                                         
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (14,135)  -   (129)  (14,264)
                                                         
Balance at December 31, 2014  19,000   19   4,931   5   1,675   2   3,723   4   22,172   (31)  (26,085)  (3,514)  (124)  (7,552)
                                                         
Re-issuance of treasury shares for cash, net of expenses  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   7,301   (55)  -   1,184   -   8,430 
                                                         
Shares issued for services rendered  -   -   -   -   63   -   -   -   175   -   -       -   175 
                                                         
Repurchase of treasury shares for release of guarantee  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   393   -   -   (393)  -   - 
                                                         
Collection of subscription receivable  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   31   -       -   31 
                                                         
Re-issuance of treasury shares for services rendered  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   719   -   719 
                                                         
Re-issuance of treasury shares for debt conversion  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   6,315   -   -   1,076   -   7,391 
                                                         
Stock based compensation - options  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   366   -   -   -   -   366 
                                                         
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (10,502)  -   29   (10,473)
                                                         
Balance at December 31, 2015  19,000  $19   4,931  $5   1,738  $2   3,723  $4  $36,722  $(55) $(36,587) $(928) $(95) $(913)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-30

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2015  2014 
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss attributable to controlling interest $(10,502) $(14,135)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  1,226   1,708 
Stock-based compensation - options  366   192 
Shares of common stock issued for services rendered  175   2,938 
Shares of treasury stock re-issued for services rendered, company formation  719   596 
Change in non-controlling interest on cash  29   (129)
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (88)  (671)
Inventory  160   93 
Prepaid expenses  (10)  13 
Other assets  (130)  38 
Accounts payable  107   123 
Accrued expenses  294   103 
Accrued interest  125   977 
Deferred revenue  (142)  142 
Net cash used in operating activities  (7,671)  (8,012)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchases of property and equipment  (60)  (197)
Collections (advances) on notes receivable - related party  100   (100)
Acquisition of intangible assets  (15)  - 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  25   (297)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of fees  31   5,143 
Re-issuance of treasury shares for cash, net of expenses  8,430   - 
Proceeds from the issuances of long-term debt  -   3,000 
Repayments of debt  (273)  (26)
Proceeds from the issuances of long-term debt - related parties  1,875   5,259 
Repayments of long-term debt - related parties  (2,675)  (3,199)
Net cash provided by financing activities  7,388   10,177 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  (258)  1,868 
Cash - beginning of the year  2,220   352 
Cash - end of the year $1,962  $2,220 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:        
Cash paid for interest $551  $23 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $1 
         
SUMMARY OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:        
Treasury stock re-purchased for long-term debt related parties $-  $2,500 
Treasury stock re-purchased for release of guarantee $393  $- 
Treasury stock re-purchased for sale of net assets - SA Concepts $-  $616 
Treasury stock re-issued for debt conversion - related parties $7,391  $- 
Accrued interest converted into debt - related parties $235  $1,400 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-31

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business and Organization

EcoArk Inc. and Subsidiaries is an innovative and growth-oriented company founded in 2011 that develops and deploys intelligent technologies and products in order to meet the demand for sustainable, integrated solutions to contemporary business needs. EcoArk Inc. is a holding company that integrates the business of its subsidiaries (see detail below).

Eco3D, LLC (“Eco3D”) is located in Phoenix, Arizona and provides customers with the latest 3D technologies. Eco3D was formed by Ecoark in November 2013 and Ecoark owns 65% of the LLC. The remaining 35% is reflected as non-controlling interests. Eco3D provides 3D mapping, modeling, and consulting services for clients in retail, construction, healthcare, and multiple other industries throughout the United States and overseas. Eco3D is transitioning businesses from 2D technology that has existed for hundreds of years, to a world of digital 3D. Eco3D incorporates a variety of 3D technologies to achieve customer goals and objectives. Utilizing several techniques, Eco3D can capture existing conditions – topography, buildings, exterior/interior spaces, etc. – in highly accurate detail that allows for 2D and 3D measurement. These measurements form the basis for analysis, design, documentation, and quality control.

Eco360, LLC (“Eco360”) is located in Bentonville, Arkansas and is engaged in research and development activities. Eco360 was formed in November 2014 by Ecoark.

Pioneer Products, LLC (“Pioneer Products”) is located in Bentonville, Arkansas and is involved in the selling of recycled plastic products and other products. In addition to a strong and successful relationship with the world’s largest retailer, Pioneer Products also has vendor relationships with other key retailers. As such, Pioneer strategically leverages its role as a trusted supplier to these retailers with existing and new products. This subsidiary also recovers plastic waste from retail supply chains and creates new consumer products with the reclaimed materials. Pioneer Products was purchased by Ecoark in 2012.

Intelleflex Corporation (“Intelleflex”) is located in San Jose, California and provides food retailers and suppliers intelligent, on-demand solutions for retailers and companies that ship and store products for perishable food quality management. Intelleflex's ZEST Data Services is a secure, multi-tenant cloud-based data collection platform for aggregating and real-time permission-based sharing and analysis of information. ZEST Fresh, a fresh food management solution that utilizes the ZEST Data Service platform, focuses on three primary value propositions – consistent food quality, reduced waste, and improved food safety. ZEST Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence on every pallet. ZEST Delivery provides real-time monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food. Intelleflex was purchased by Ecoark in September 2013.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EcoArk, Inc. and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “the Company”. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company is a holding company and holds one hundred percent of Eco360, Pioneer and Intelleflex. EcoArk owns 65% of Eco3D and the remaining 35% interest is owned by executives of Eco3D.

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except when control does not rest with the parent. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8, the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree.

Noncontrolling Interests

In accordance with ASC 810-10-45,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,the Company classifies noncontrolling interests as a component of equity within the consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, net income or (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests of $29 and ($129), respectively, is included in the Company’s net loss.

 

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.SU.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or the “SEC”). It is Management'smanagement’s opinion that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation.As a result of the merger transaction described in Note 14 and in accordance with ASC 805-40-45, the Company has given retroactive effect to certain share calculations by restating amounts (see Note 15).

F-32

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

 

Reclassification

The Company has reclassified certain amounts in the 2014fiscal 2019 consolidated financial statements to comply with the 20152020 presentation. These changes principally consistrelate to classification of stating $1,053 of research and development costs as a component of operating expenses rather than as acertain revenues, cost of revenues and had no effect onrelated segment data, as well as certain research and development expenses. Reclassifications relating to the net lossdiscontinued operations of Pioneer, Sable and Magnolia are described further in Note 2 for 2014.2019 and Pinnacle Vac for 2020.

 

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, management’s estimate of provisions required for non-collectibleuncollectible accounts receivable, obsolete or slow-moving inventory,fair value of assets held for sale and assets and liabilities acquired, impaired value of equipment and intangible assets, including goodwill, asset retirement obligations, estimates of discount rates in lease, liabilities to accrue, fair value of derivative liabilities associated with warrants, cost incurred in the satisfaction of performance obligations, permanent and temporary differences related to income taxes and determination of the fair value of stock awards issued.awards. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

The estimates of proved, probable and possible oil and gas reserves are used as significant inputs in determining the depletion of oil and gas properties and the impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proven, probable and possible reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. Similarly, evaluations for impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties are subject to numerous uncertainties including, among others, estimates of future recoverable reserves and commodity price outlooks. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions utilized.

Cash

Cash consists of cash, demand deposits and money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at The Company holds no cash equivalents as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company maintains cash balances in excess of the lower of cost or market. Inventory cost is determined by specific identification on a first in first out basis, and provisions are madeFDIC insured limit. The Company does not consider this risk to reduce slow-moving, obsolete, or unusable inventories to their estimated useful or scrap values.be material.

 

Property and Equipment and Long-Lived Assets

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation on property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from threetwo to ten years for all classes of property and equipment, except leasehold improvements which are depreciated over the shorter of 10 years or the term of the lease.lease, which is shorter than the estimated useful life of the improvements.

 

FASB Codification TopicASC 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment” (ASC 360), requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The applicationCompany has early adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2017-04Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment effective April 1, 2017. The adoption of ASC 360 hasthis ASU did not materially affectedhave a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The Company reviews recoverability of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment is based primarily on the Company’s reported earnings, financial condition orability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows.flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

F-8

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

 

IntangibleASC 360-10 addresses criteria to be considered for long-lived assets with definite useful livesexpected to be disposed of by sale. Six criteria are statedlisted in ASC 360-10-45-9 that must be met in order for assets to be classified as held for sale. Once the criteria are met, long-lived assets classified as held for sale are to be measured at costthe lower of carrying amount or fair value less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets capitalizedcosts to sell. The Company did consider it necessary to record impairment charges for equipment acquired as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 represent the valuationpart of the Company-owned patentsSable acquisition. As of March 31, 2019, the property and customer lists. equipment of Sable and Magnolia Solar have been reclassified as assets held for sale as more fully described in Note 2.

These intangible assets are being amortized over estimated flows over the estimated useful lives of ten years for the customer relationships and on a straight-line basis over their estimated average useful lives of thirteen and a halffive years for the patents and three years for the customer lists. Expendituresnon-compete agreements. These intangible assets will be amortized commencing April 1, 2020. Any expenditures on intangible assets through the Company’s filing of patent and trademark protection for Company-owned inventions are expensed as incurred.

 

The Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

 

1. Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;

 

2. Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and

 

3. Significant negative industry or economic trends.

 

When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows. The Company tested the carrying value of its intangiblelong-lived assets for recoverability. The projected undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value of these assets by a significant amount. The Company did not consider it necessary to record any impairment chargesrecoverability during the yearsyear ended DecemberMarch 31, 20152020, and 2014.there was no impairment recorded during this period.

 

Advertising ExpenseOil and Gas Properties

The Company expenses advertisinguses the full cost method of accounting for its investment in oil and natural gas properties. Under the full cost method of accounting, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including directly related overhead costs are capitalized. General and administrative costs related to production and general overhead are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses

All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized on the unit of production method using estimates of proved reserves. Disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction of capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized unless such adjustment would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in operations. Unproved properties and development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the loss from operations before income taxes and the adjusted carrying amount of the unproved properties is amortized on the unit-of-production method.

There was no depreciation, depletion and amortization expense for the Company’s oil and gas properties for the years ended DecemberMarch 31, 20152020 and 20142019, respectively.

Limitation on Capitalized Costs

Under the full-cost method of accounting, we are required, at the end of each reporting date, to perform a test to determine the limit on the book value of our oil and gas properties (the “Ceiling” test). If the capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties, net of accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, exceed the Ceiling, the excess or impairment is charged to expense. The expense may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher oil and gas prices may subsequently increase the Ceiling. The Ceiling is defined as the sum of: (a) the present value, discounted at 10% and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions, of (1) estimated future gross revenues from proved reserves, which is computed using oil and gas prices determined as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month hedging arrangements pursuant to SAB 103, less (2) estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves; plus, (b) the cost of properties being amortized; plus, (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in other generalthe costs being amortized, net of (d) the related tax effects related to the difference between the book and administrative costs.tax basis of our oil and natural gas properties. A ceiling test was performed as of March 31, 2020 and there was no indication of impairment on the oil and gas properties.

 

F-33

F-9

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and sharesAND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBERMARCH 31, 2015 AND 20142020

Oil and Gas Reserves

Reserve engineering is a subjective process that is dependent upon the quality of available data and interpretation thereof, including evaluations and extrapolations of well flow rates and reservoir pressure. Estimates by different engineers often vary sometimes significantly. In addition, physical factors such as results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of an estimate, as well as economic factors such as changes in product prices, may justify revision of such estimates. Because proved reserves are required to be estimated using recent prices of the evaluation, estimated reserve quantities can be significantly impacted by changes in product prices.

Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation

Asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) primarily represent the estimated present value of the amount the Company will incur to plug, abandon and remediate its producing properties at the projected end of their productive lives, in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws. The Company determined its ARO by calculating the present value of the estimated cash flows related to the obligation. The retirement obligation is recorded as a liability at its estimated present value as of the obligation’s inception, with an offsetting increase to proved properties.

 

Software Costs

The Company accounts for software development costs in accordance with ASC 985.730, 985-730Software Research and Development, and ASC 985-20, Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed. ASC 985-20 requires that costs related to the development of the Company’s productsbe capitalized as an asset when incurred subsequent to the point at which technological feasibility of the enhancement is established.established and prior to when a product is available for general release to customers. ASC 985-20 specifies that “technological feasibility”technological feasibility can only be established by the completion of a “detailed program design” or if no such design is prepared, upon the completion of a “working model” of the software. The Company’s development process does not include a detailed program design. Management believes that suchCosts incurred prior to achieving technological feasibility are expensed. The Company does utilize detailed program designs; however, the Company’s products are released soon after technological feasibility has been established and as a design could be produced in the early stages of development but would entail significant wasted expense and delay. Consequently, ASC 985-20 requires thatresult software development costs be recordedhave been expensed as an expense until the completion of a “working model”. In the Company’s case, the completion of a working model does not occur until shortly before the time when the software is ready for sale.incurred.

 

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These costs include internal salaries and related costs and professional fees for activities related to development. These costs relate to the Zest Data Services platform, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery.

 

Subsequent Events

Subsequent events have beenwere evaluated up through March 28, 2016 except for Note 15 which is dated June 15, 2016, the date the consolidated financial statements were issued in accordance with ASC 855-10-50-1.

filed.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company reports shipping and handling revenues and their associated costs in revenue and cost of revenue, respectively. Shipping revenues and costs for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were nominal and included in cost of product sales.

 

Revenue Recognition

In regards to product revenue, product revenue primarily consists of the sale of electronic hardware, recycled plastics products, and recycled furniture. These subsidiaries recognize revenue when the following criteria have been met:

 

Evidence of an arrangement exists.The Company considersaccounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which the Company early adopted effective April 1, 2017. No cumulative adjustment to accumulated deficit was required as a customer purchase order, service agreement, contract, or equivalent document to be evidenceresult of an arrangement.

Delivery has occurred. The Company’s standard transfer terms are freethis adoption, and the early adoption did not have a material impact on board (FOB) shipping point. Thus, delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have passedour consolidated financial statements as no material arrangements prior to the customer at the time of shipment.

The fee is fixed or determinable.The Company considers the fee to be fixed or determinable if the fee is not subject to refund or adjustment and payment terms are standard, which is generally 30-60 days.

Collection is deemed reasonably assured. Collection is deemed reasonably assured if it is expected that the customer will be able to pay amountsadoption were impacted under the arrangement as payments become due. If it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, then revenue is deferred and recognized upon cash collection.new pronouncement.

 

The Company accounts for its software revenue will recognize revenues in accordance with ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition.

Revenue from software license agreements is recognizeda contract when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery ofit has been approved and committed to, each party’s rights regarding the softwaregoods or services to be transferred have been identified, the payment terms have been identified, the contract has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable,commercial substance, and collectability is probable. In softwareRevenue is generally recognized net of allowances for returns and any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities. Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements that include more than one element,requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the Company allocates the total arrangement fee among the elements based on the relative fair value offor each of the elements.

 

License revenue allocated to software products generally is recognized upon delivery of the products or deferred and recognized in future periods to the extent that an arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and for which fair values have not been established. Revenue allocated to maintenance agreements is recognized ratably over the maintenance term and revenue allocated to training and other service elements is recognized as the services are performed. If evidence of fair value does not exist for all elements of a license agreement and post customer support (PCS) is the only undelivered element, then all revenue for the license arrangement is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement as license revenue. If evidence of fair value of all undelivered PCS elements exists but evidence does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue.F-10

F-34

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and sharesAND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBERMARCH 31, 2015 AND 20142020

Revenue from software license agreements of Zest Labs is recognized over time or at a point in time depending on the evaluation of when the customer obtains control of the promised goods or services over the term of the agreement. For agreements where the software requires continuous updates to provide the intended functionality, revenue is recognized over the term of the agreement. For software as a service (“SaaS”) contracts that include multiple performance obligations, including hardware, perpetual software licenses, subscriptions, term licenses, maintenance and other services, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on estimates of the price that would be charged to the customer for each promised product or service if it were sold on a standalone basis. For contracts for new products and services where standalone pricing has not been established, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on estimates using the adjusted market assessment approach, the expected cost plus a margin approach or the residual approach as appropriate under the circumstances. Contracts are typically on thirty-day payment terms from when the Company satisfies the performance obligation in the contract. In fiscal 2020 and 2019, the Company did not have significant revenue from software license agreements.

Revenue under master service agreements is recorded upon the performance obligation being satisfied. Typically, the satisfaction of the performance obligation occurs upon the frac sand load being delivered to the customer site and this load being successfully invoiced and accepted by the Company’s factoring agent.

The Company accounts for contract costs in accordance with ASC Topic 340-40,Contracts with Customers. The Company recognizes the cost of sales of a contract as expense when incurred or at the time a performance obligation is satisfied. The Company recognizes an asset from the costs to fulfil a contract only if the costs relate directly to a contract, the costs generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying a performance obligation in the future and the costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are capitalized unless the costs would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract was obtained.

 

Cost of licensesales for Pinnacle Frac includes all direct expenses incurred to produce the revenue primarily includes product, delivery, and royalty costs. Cost of maintenance and service revenue consists primarily of labor costs for engineers performing implementation services, technical support, and training personnel as well as facilities and equipment costs.

The Company enters into arrangements that can include various combinations of software, services, and hardware. Where elements are delivered over different periods of time, and when allowed under U.S. GAAP, revenue is allocated to the respective elements based on their relative selling prices at the inception of the arrangement, and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. The Company uses a hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence, and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“ESP”). For software elements, the Company follows the industry specific software guidance which only allows for the use of VSOE in establishing fair value. Generally, VSOE is the price charged when the deliverable is sold separately or the price established by management for a product thatperiod. This includes, but is not yet sold if it is probable that the price will not change before introduction into the marketplace.

ESPs are established as best estimates of what the selling prices would be if the deliverables were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. The process for determining ESPs requires judgmentlimited to, direct employee labor, direct contract labor and considers multiple factors that may vary over time depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable.

When the arrangement with a customer includes significant production, modification, or customization of the software, we recognize the related revenue using the percentage-of-completion method in accordance with the accounting guidance and certain production-type contracts contained in ASC 605-35, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts.  We use the percentage of completion method provided all of the following conditions exist:

the contract includes provisions that clearly specify the enforceable rights regarding goods or services to be provided and received by the parties, the consideration to be exchanged and the manner and terms of settlement;

the customer can be expected to satisfy its obligations under the contract;

the Company can be expected to perform its contractual obligations; and

reliable estimates of progress towards completion can be made.

We measure completion based on achieving milestones detailed in the agreements with the customers. Costs of providing services, including services accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-35, are expensed as incurred.fuel.

 

Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company considers accounts receivable, net of allowance for returns and doubtful accounts, to be fully collectible. The allowance is based on management’s estimate of the overall collectability of accounts receivable, considering historical losses, credit insurance and economic conditions. Based on these same factors, individual accounts are charged off against the allowance when management determines those individual accounts are uncollectible. Credit extended to customers is generally uncollateralized.uncollateralized, however credit insurance is obtained for some customers. Past-due status is based on contractual terms. Management has determined

For Pinnacle Frac, accounts receivable is comprised of unsecured amounts due from customers that have been conveyed to a factoring agent without recourse. Pinnacle Frac receives an advance from the allowancefactoring agent of 98% of the amount invoiced to the customer within one business day. The Company recognizes revenue for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2015100% of the gross amount invoiced, records an expense for the 2% finance charge by the factoring agent, and 2014 was $2 and $0, respectively.realizes cash for the 98% net proceeds received.

 

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company follows ASC 740-10 “AccountingAccounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”Taxes. This requires recognition and measurement of uncertain income tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” approach. Management evaluates their tax positions on an annual basis.

 

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction and various state tax jurisdictions. The federal and state income tax returns of the Company are subject to examination by the IRS and state taxing authorities, generally for three years after they were filed.

 

Stock-BasedVacation and Paid-Time-Off Compensation

The Company follows ASC 718-10710-10“Share Based Payments”Compensation – General. The Company calculates compensationrecords liabilities and expense for all awards granted, but not yet vested, based onwhen obligations are attributable to services already rendered, will be paid even if an employee is terminated, payment is probable, and the grant-date fair values. Stock-based compensation expense for all awards granted is based on the grant-date fair values. The Company recognizes these compensation costs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, on a pro rata basis over the requisite service period of each vesting tranche of each award. The Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as trends of actual option forfeitures when estimating the forfeiture rate.

F-35

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014amount can be estimated.

 

The Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee stock-basedshare-based compensation under ASC 505-50Accounting for Equity Instruments that are IssuedEquity-Based Payments to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or ServicesNon-Employees. The fair value of the optionoptions and shares issued is used to measure the transaction,transactions, as this is more reliable than the fair value of the services received. The fair value is measured at the value of the Company’s common stock on the date that the commitment for performance by the counterparty has been reached or the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to expense, or to a prepaid expense if shares of common stock are issued in advance of services being rendered, and additional paid-in capital.

F-11

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

The Company adopted ASU 2016-09Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting effective April 1, 2017. Cash paid when shares were directly withheld for tax withholding purposes is classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. There were no other impacts from this adoption.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 825 "Financial Instruments," requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company'sCompany’s financial instruments: The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses,liabilities, and accountsamounts payable to related parties, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s debt instruments also approximates fair value.

 

Recoverability of Long-Lived AssetsLeases

The Company reviews recoverabilityfollows ASC 840Leases in accounting for leased properties. The Company leases office and production facilities for terms typically ranging from three to five years. Rent escalations over the term of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment is based primarily onlease are considered at the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying valueinception of the assets exceedslease such that the fair value ofmonthly average for all payments is recorded as straight-line rent expense with any differences recorded in accrued liabilities. As subsequently described, the assets. Fixed assets to be disposed of by sale will be carried atCompany is adopting ASC 842Leases for the lower of the then current carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.fiscal year beginning April 1, 2019.

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share (EPS)(“EPS”) include additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as convertible notes, preferred stock, stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants. Common stock equivalents are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reports a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for periods presented.presented, so only basic weighted average number of common shares are used in the computations.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Management evaluates all of the Company’s financial instruments, including warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. The Company generally uses a Black-Scholes model, as applicable, to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates when needed. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is remeasured at the end of each reporting period. The Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of the derivative liabilities.

 

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820Fair Value Measurements”Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles,accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

 

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

 

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

 

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

 

Segment Information

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”.Segment Reporting.This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which management disaggregates the Company in making internal operating decisions. For 2015 and 2014 theThe Company and its Chief Operating Decision Makers determined that the Company’s operations were divided into two segments: Products and Services. See Note 13 for segment information disclosures.

Related Party Transactions

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common controleffective with the Company. Related parties also include principal stockholdersMay 31, 2019, acquisition of Trend Holdings and the Company, its management, membersMarch 27, 2020 acquisition of the immediate familiesBanner Midstream now consist of principal stockholders of the Companythree segments, Trend Holdings (Finance), Banner Midstream (Commodities) and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal where one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all related party transactions. All transactions shall be recorded at fair value of the goods or services exchanged. Property purchased from a related party is recorded at the cost to the related party and any payment to or on behalf of the related party in excess of the cost is reflected as compensation or distribution to related parties depending on the transaction.

A related party receivable of $100 outstanding at December 31, 2014 was collected in August 2015.

F-36

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014Zest Labs (Technology).

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”.ASU 2016-02 changes the accounting for leased assets, principally by requiring balance sheet recognition of assets under lease arrangements. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis." ASU 2015-02 changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-17, “Business Combinations – Pushdown Accounting.” The provisions of ASU 2014-17 require management to determining whether and at what threshold an acquiree (acquired entity) can reflect the acquirer’s accounting and reporting basis (pushdown accounting) in its separate financial statements. Since neither unit of this business combination is in the development stage, nor had recognizable revenues during this period the application of push down accounting would not be of significant value to the readers of these consolidated financial statements.  The Company has not elected to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of this event.

During August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern.” The provisions of ASU 2014-15 require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, and most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.  The amendments in ASU 2014-09 will be applied using one of two retrospective methods. The effective date will be the first quarter of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. The Company has not determined the potential effects on its financial statements.

There were other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Going Concern

The Company commenced operations in 2011, and has experienced typical start-up costs and losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $36,587 since inception. The accumulated deficit as well as recurring losses of $10,502 and $14,135 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the working capital deficit of $2,153 as of December 31, 2015, have resulted in the uncertainty of the Company to continue as a going concern.

These consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable period of time.

The Company plans to raise additional capital to carry out its business plan and following a reverse merger transaction in March 2016, the Company received $6,725 (see Note 14). The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through future equity and debt securities issuances is unknown. Obtaining additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, ultimately, to profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of the uncertainties.

F-37

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 2:INVENTORY

Inventory, net of reserves, consisted of the following as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

  2015  2014 
Inventory $1,363  $1,495 
Inventory Reserves  (620)  (592)
Total $743  $903 

NOTE 3:PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

  2015  2014 
Furniture and fixtures $110  $110 
Computers and software costs  382   359 
Machinery and equipment  476   443 
Leasehold improvements  4   5 
Total property and equipment  972   917 
Accumulated depreciation  (609)  (455)
Property and equipment, net $363  $462 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $159 and $312, respectively. There was no impairment on these assets for this two-year period. The Company retired approximately $5 of fully depreciated property and equipment in 2015.

NOTE 4: INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following is a summary of intangible assets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

  2015  2014 
Customer lists $3,980  $3,965 
Patents  1,013   1,013 
Total intangible assets  4,993   4,978 
Accumulated amortization  (4,141)  (3,074)
Intangible assets, net $852  $1,904 

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $1,067 and $1,396, respectively. There was no impairment on these assets for this two-year period. Amortization amounts for the next five years are: $116, $116, $81, $75 and $75.

F-38

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 5: LONG-TERM DEBT – RELATED PARTIES

The following is a summary of long-term debt – related parties as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

    2015  2014 
Promissory notes – shareholders (a) $-  $- 
Promissory note – related party (b)  50   412 
Promissory note #1 – CEO (c)  62   227 
Promissory note #2 – CEO (d)  -   2,500 
Promissory note #3 – CEO (e)  1,217   - 
Note payable – various (f)  -   800 
Note payable –SA Concepts (g)  -   74 
Note payable – Goldenhawk (h)  -   3,674 
Note payable - other (i)  -   1,600 
Total    1,329   9,287 
Less: current portion    (1,329)  (6,176)
Long-term debt – related parties   $-  $3,111 

(a)Note payable to shareholders commencing July 22, 2013 issued at an interest rate of 10% maturing September 22, 2013, secured by the fixed and intangible assets of Intelleflex. The principal balance of $1,100 remained outstanding accruing interest at the rate of 10% through November 16, 2014. On November 16, 2014 these notes along with accrued interest in the amount of $908, as well as principal of $1,174 and accrued interest of $493 (see note (c)) were grouped into new debt with a related company “Goldenhawk” referred to in (h).

(b)Unsecured note payable to former shareholder bearing interest at 5% per annum, with monthly principal and interest payments beginning in November 2014, maturing in November 2016.

(c)Note payable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Randy May. In 2013 and 2014 the note was accruing interest at the rate of 10% through November 16, 2014. On November 16, 2014, the then outstanding principal of $1,174 and the accrued interest of $493 were combined with the outstanding balances of other shareholder notes in the principal amount of $1,100 and accrued interest of $908 (see note (a)) to create a new note with a related company “Goldenhawk” referred to in (h). The new note payable from November 17, 2014 through December 31, 2014 was an unsecured note bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum, maturing in November 2015. On November 30, 2015, after monthly payments were being made, and additional amounts funded in March 2015 and May 2015 totaling $600, the Company along with the $2,500 (d below), combined these amounts into a new one year promissory note in the amount of $3,197 due November 30, 2016. Payments of $30 were made on this note in the first quarter of 2016.

(d)Unsecured note payable with the Company’s CEO, bearing interest at 6% per annum. Quarterly interest payments were due commencing February 2015, with the note maturing in November 2015. Note was the result of the value of the 5,000 Class A Common Shares re-acquired on November 16, 2014 from the CEO in an effort to raise capital without further dilution to the current shareholders. See (c) above for details on the extension of this note.

(e)Note payable with the Company’s CEO commencing November 30, 2015 at an interest rate of 6% per annum (see note c). The beginning principal balance of $3,197 was reduced by $1,980 on December 31, 2015 in exchange for 550 shares of Series A General Common Shares that were Treasury Shares owned by the Company. The remaining principal balance matures in November 2016.

(f)Various related party unsecured notes bearing interest at 10% per annum. Notes were to mature in January 2015, however were extended through August 2015 and fully paid off by August 2015.

F-39

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

(g)Note payable to SA Concepts upon sale of that Company on November 16, 2014. Original principal amount of $100. Note matured in March 2015 at which time it was paid off and there was no interest charged on this note.

(h)As noted in (a) and (c) above, this note commenced on November 16, 2014 as the result of the combination of two separate notes and accrued interest on those respective notes. Commencing November 16, 2014, this new note bears interest at the rate of 6% per annum, unsecured, with quarterly interest payments due commencing February 2015 and the note maturing in November 2015. Interest on this note was paid for the first 6 months, then the accrued interest was added to the principal and a new note was entered into on November 18, 2015, for a period of one year. This note along with the balance in the note referenced in (i) was converted to 1,503 shares of Series A General Common Shares that were Treasury Shares owned by the Company on December 31, 2015.

(i)Unsecured advances from related party Goldenhawk. This note was converted to Series A General Common Shares that were Treasury Shares owned by the Company (see (h)) on December 31, 2015.

Interest expense on the long-term debt – related parties for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $466 and $1,236, respectively.

NOTE 6: NOTE PAYABLE - BANK

The Company’s former subsidiary, SA Concepts, had a note payable with a bank that was due November 2014 at 5.5% interest per annum. The note was transferred to the Company upon the sale of SA Concepts. The note was secured by the property of the Company. This note was extended to February 2016 and was paid off in October 2015. The balance of this note at December 31, 2014 was $250.

NOTE 7: LONG-TERM DEBT

The following is a summary of long-term debt as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

    2015  2014 
Note payable – Celtic Bank (a) $175  $198 
Note payable – B&B Merritt (b)  3,000   3,000 
Total    3,175   3,198 
Less: current portion    (3,175)  (3,027)
Long-term debt   $-  $171 

(a)Fifteen year note payable dated July 11, 2007 in the original principal amount of $1,250 with a bank guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration with Pioneer, prior to the acquisition of Pioneer by the Company. Note accrued interest at the Prime Rate plus 2% (Prime rate 3.25% plus 2% for both December 31, 2015 and 2014). This note contained guarantees and first and second perfected security interests in personal property. The note was fully paid in January 2016.

(b)Note payable bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum, unsecured, with quarterly interest payments commencing in January 2015, with the note maturing in October 2016. Upon maturity or anytime prior, so long as the Company has not exercised its right to prepay this note, the lender can exercise its option to convert this note to equity in the Company, with 30 day advance written notice, and acquire up to 1,500 unrestricted Class A Common Shares of the Company at $2.00 per share. The principal amount along with any accrued interest thereon, if converted to equity shall be deemed fully paid. As of December 31, 2015, no conversions of this debt have occurred. There was no bifurcation of the conversion option as the conversion is deemed to be conventional in nature.

Interest expense on the long-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $310 and $11, respectively.

F-40

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 8: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

On November 28, 2011, the Company was formed with three series’ of common stock authorizing a total of 50,000 shares as follows:

Series A General Common Shares – 38,000 authorized shares

Series B Common Shares – 10,000 authorized shares

Series C Common Shares – 2, 000 authorized shares

On April 29, 2013, the Certificate of Incorporation was amended to increase the authorized shares to 58,000 shares, designating a Series D Common Shares with an authorized limit of 8,000 shares.

On November 1, 2014, the Certificate of Incorporation was amended a second time to increase the authorized shares to 61,000 shares, increasing the Series C Common Shares authorized from 2,000 shares to 5,000 shares.

As a result of the merger transaction described in Note 14 and in accordance with ASC 805-40-45, the Company has given retroactive effect to certain share numbers and calculations by restating amounts (see Note 15).

Series A General Common Shares (“Series A Stock”) and Treasury Stock

The Series A Stock was incorporated with 38,000 shares authorized with a par value of $0.01.

Each share of Series A Stock represents the right to one (1) vote on all issues presented to shareholders for a vote. Series A shareholders will not have any cumulative voting rights.

Holders of Series A Stock shall be entitled to receive a dividend, if, when and as authorized and declared by the Board of Directors, out of assets of the Company legally available therefore.

Upon the voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation or winding up on the affairs of the Company, after the payment in full of its debts and other liabilities, the remaining Company assets are to be distributed pro rata among the holders of the common stock.

All 38,000 shares of authorized Series A Stock were issued to the founders of the Company at par ($380) for services rendered to the Company in the start-up phase. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the 38,000 shares are issued, and there were 17,229 and 12,300 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The 1,771 and 6,700 share difference between issued shares and outstanding shares represent treasury stock. At various times in 2013 through 2014, the Company repurchased shares in various transactions, and re-issued some of these shares in other acquisitions of companies as well as for services rendered. The treasury stock is calculated at cost, and the value of the treasury stock at December 31, 2015 and 2014 are $928 and $3,514, respectively.

Series B Common Shares (“Series B Stock”)

The Series B Stock was incorporated with 10,000 shares authorized with a par value of $0.01.

Every fifty (50) shares of Series B Stock represent the right to one (1) vote on all issues presented to shareholders for a vote. Series B shareholders will not have any cumulative voting rights.

Holders of Series B Stock shall be entitled to receive a dividend, if, when and as authorized and declared by the Board of Directors, out of assets of the Company legally available therefore.

Upon the voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation or winding up on the affairs of the Company, after the payment in full of its debts and other liabilities, the remaining Company assets are to be distributed pro rata among the holders of the common stock.

The Company issued 4,431 shares of Series B Stock in 2012 for $8,342. Of this amount the Company had a subscription receivable in the amount of $885 that was received in 2013. Additionally, in 2013, the Company issued 500 shares of Series B Stock for services valued at $800.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company has 4,931 shares issued and outstanding. 

F-41

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

Series C Common Shares (“Series C Stock”)

The Series C Stock was incorporated with 2,000 shares authorized with a par value of $0.01. On November 1, 2014, the Certificate of Incorporation was amended a second time to increase the authorized shares of the Series C Stock from 2,000 shares to 5,000 shares.

The Series C stockholders will have no voting rights.

Holders of Series C Stock shall be entitled to receive a dividend, if, when and as authorized and declared by the Board of Directors, out of assets of the Company legally available therefore.

Upon the voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation or winding up on the affairs of the Company, after the payment in full of its debts and other liabilities, the remaining Company assets are to be distributed pro rata among the holders of the common stock.

In 2013, the Company issued 1,000 shares of Series C Stock for services rendered valued at $2,500; in 2014, the Company issued 675 shares of Series C Stock for services rendered valued at $1,688; and in 2015, the Company issued 63 shares of Series C Stock for services rendered valued at $175.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company has 1,738 and 1,675 shares issued and outstanding.

Series D Common Shares (“Series D Stock”)

On April 29, 2013, the Certificate of Incorporation was amended to designate a new class of shares, Series D Stock with authorized shares of 8,000 shares.

The Series D Stock has a par value of $0.01.

Every fifty (50) shares of Series D Stock represent the right to one (1) vote on all issues presented to shareholders for a vote. Series B shareholders will not have any cumulative voting rights.

Holders of Series D Stock shall be entitled to receive a dividend, if, when and as authorized and declared by the Board of Directors, out of assets of the Company legally available therefore.

Upon the voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation or winding up on the affairs of the Company, after the payment in full of its debts and other liabilities, the remaining Company assets are to be distributed pro rata among the holders of the common stock.

The Company issued 890 shares of Series D Stock in 2013 for $1,876. Additionally, in 2014, the Company issued 2,334 shares for $5,373 of which $31 is reflected was a subscription receivable and was collected in February 2015, and an additional 500 shares of Series D Stock for services valued at $1,250. No Series D Stock was issued in 2015.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company has 3,723 shares issued and outstanding.

Series C Stock Options (“Series C Stock Options”)

On February 16, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the EcoArk Inc. 2013 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”).The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants, and to promote the success of the Company’s business. The Plan is expected to contribute to the attainment of these objectives by offering employees, directors and consultants the opportunity to acquire stock ownership interests in the Company, and other rights with respect to stock of the Company, and to thereby provide them with incentives to put forth maximum efforts for the success of the Company.

Awards under the Plan may only be granted in the form of nonstatutory stock options (“Options”) to purchase the Company's Series C Stock. The Company does not plan to register the Series C Stock under applicable securities laws and certificates evidencing shares of Series C Stock issued upon exercise may contain a legend restricting transfer thereof.

The maximum number of shares to be issued under the Plan is 5,000.

In May 2014, the Company granted 347 thousand Series C Stock Options to various employees and consultants of the Company. The Series C Stock Options have a term of 10 years, and the Series C Stock Options vest over a three-year period as follows: 25% immediately; 25% on the first anniversary date; 25% on the second anniversary date; and 25% on the third anniversary date. During 2015 the Company issued 313 thousand additional Series C Stock Options.

Management valued the Series C Stock Options utilizing the Black-Scholes Method, with the following criteria: stock price - $1.25; exercise price - $1.25; expected term – 10 years; discount rate – 0.25%; and volatility – 100%.

The Company records stock based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, and has recorded stock based compensation of $366 and $192 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. 

F-42

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 9: ACQUISITIONS

SA Concepts

On June 11, 2013, the Company, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with Sustainable Aerodynamic (“SA”) Concepts pursuant to which the Company issued from its shares held in Class A Stock 750 shares to three individuals valued at $426 to acquire 100% of SA Concepts. The Company sold this entity in November 2014. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase of a business under ASC 805.

Intelleflex Corporation

On September 19, 2013, the Company acquired Intelleflex Corporation. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase of a business under ASC 805.

The allocation of the purchase price was as follows

Cash $782 
Inventory  988 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  210 
Fixed assets  510 
Intangible assets  1,013 
Accounts payable and other liabilities  (1,010)
Total $2,492 
     
Cash $1,300 
Retirement of debt  1,192 
Total consideration $2,492 

The intangible assets represent acquired patents that were independently valued. The remaining useful life of these patents was 13.5 years as of the date purchased.

NOTE 10: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The Company leases many of its operating and office facilities for various terms under long-term, non-cancelable operating lease agreements. These leases expire at various dates through 2018. Rent expense was approximately $412 and $415 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Future minimum lease payments required under the operating leases are as follows: 2016 - $284, 2017 - $96, and 2018 - $68. In March 2016 the Company agreed to lease additional space adjoining its office in Phoenix, Arizona. This will increase the future minimum payments and extend them through 2019.

Settlement

In March 2016 the Company agreed to settle a dispute regarding a contract. The agreement requires the Company to pay $100 to certain parties within 30 days of the agreement. The amount was recorded as an operating expense and included in accrued expenses as of December 31, 2015.

F-43

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 11: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

SA Concepts

In November 2014, the Company sold its subsidiary, SA Concepts. In the sale, the Company sold the net assets back to an original shareholder of SA Concepts for his return of 1,000 Class A shares of stock. The value of the treasury stock in this transaction of $616 was equal to the value of the net assets of SA Concepts sold. Therefore, there was no gain or loss attributable to the disposal of this subsidiary. The operations of SA Concepts for the year ended December 31, 2014 are reflected as loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations in accordance with ASC 205-50.

The following table sets forth for the year ended December 31, 2014 selected financial data of the Company’s discontinued operations of its SA Concepts subsidiary.

Revenues $379 
Cost of sales  818 
Gross (loss)  (439)
Operating and other non-operating expenses  1,010 
Loss from discontinued operations  (1,449)
Gain from sale of SA Concepts  - 
Loss from discontinued operations $(1,449)

NOTE 12: PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 differs from the amount which would be expected as a result of applying the statutory tax rates to the losses before income taxes due primarily to the valuation allowance to fully reserve net deferred tax assets.

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon sufficient future taxable income during the period that deductible temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable income.  As the achievement of required future taxable income is uncertain, the Company recorded a valuation allowance.

  As of
December 31, 2015
  As of
December 31, 2014
 
Deferred tax assets:      
Net operating loss before non-deductible items $(36,028) $(25,892)
Tax rate  34%  34%
Total deferred tax assets  12,250   8,803 
Less: Valuation allowance  (12,250)  (8,803)
         
Net deferred tax assets $-  $- 

As of December 31, 2015, the Company has a net operating loss carry forward of $36,028 expiring through 2035. The Company has provided a valuation allowance against the full amount of the deferred tax asset due to management’s uncertainty about its realization. Furthermore, the net operating loss carry forward may be subject to further limitation pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The valuation allowance was increased by $3,447 in 2015.

F-44

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 13: SEGMENT INFORMATION AND CONCENTRATIONS

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”. This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which Management disaggregates the Company in making operating decisions. As of December 31, 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company operates in two segments. The segments are Products (principally consisting of Pioneer Products’ operations consisting of sales of recycled plastic products) and Services (principally consisting of Eco3D’s mapping, modeling and consulting services business plus costs associated with developing Intelleflex and Eco360 solutions). Home office costs are allocated to the two segments based on the relative support provided to those segments.

December 31, 2015 Products  Services  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $5,167  $2,701  $7,868 
Cost of revenues  4,960   1,178   6,138 
Gross profit  207   1,523   1,730 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation and amortization, and interest expense, net  178   10,014   10,192 
Depreciation and amortization  992   234   1,226 
Interest expense, net  10   775   785 
Net (loss) applicable to common shares  (973)  (9,500)  (10,473)
Non-controlling interest income  -   29   29 
Net (loss) – controlling interest $(973) $(9,529) $(10,502)
Segmented assets            
Property and equipment, net $-  $363  $363 
Intangible assets, net $15  $837  $852 
Capital expenditures $-  $60  $60 

December 31, 2014 Products  Services  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $4,378  $1,639  $6,017 
Cost of revenues  4,298   726   5,024 
Gross profit  80   913   993 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation and amortization, interest expense, net and loss from discontinued operations  200   10,630   10,830 
Depreciation and amortization  1,322   386   1,708 
Interest expense, net  11   1,259   1,270 
Loss from discontinued operations  1,449   -   1,449 
Net (loss) applicable to common shares  (2,902)  (11,362)  (14,264)
Non-controlling interest loss  -   (129)  (129)
Net (loss) – controlling interest $(2,902) $(11,233) $(14,135)
Segmented assets            
Property and equipment, net $-  $462  $462 
Intangible assets, net $991  $913  $1,904 
Capital expenditures $-  $197  $197 

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had one major customer comprising 63% and 72% of sales. A major customer is defined as a customer that represents 10% or greater of total sales. Additionally, the Company had two customers as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 with accounts receivable balances of 32% and 54% of the total accounts receivable. The Company does not believe that the risk associated with these customers will have an adverse effect on the business.

The Company maintained cash balances in excess of the FDIC insured limit in both years. The Company does not consider this risk to be material.

F-45

ECOARK INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS and shares IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE data)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

NOTE 14: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During January 2016 the Company re-issued 50 Class A Treasury Shares. The Company re-issued those shares as it raised an additional $200.

On January 29, 2016, the Company entered into a Merger Agreement with Magnolia Solar Corporation (“MSC”) providing, among other things, for the acquisition of the Company by MSC in a share for share exchange pursuant to which it was contemplated that at the closing the Company shareholders would own approximately 95% of the outstanding shares of MSC. On March 18, 2016, in a special meeting called by MSC, the shareholders of MSC approved proposals necessary to complete the merger. Following the shareholder meeting, the name of MSC was changed to Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (EHI). Further, the Articles of Incorporation were amended to increase the authorized shares of common stock to 100,000 shares, to effect the creation of 5,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock, and to approve a reverse stock split of the MSC common stock of 1 for 250.

On March 24, 2016, FINRA corporate action announced the reverse split and the name change which became effective in the market on March 28, 2016. Following that, EHI stock will trade under the symbol “EARK.” All actions to close the merger were completed in March 2016.

In conjunction with the merger, MSC offered up to 5,000 thousand units at a price of $4.00 per unit or a maximum of $20,000 in a private placement offering. Each unit consists of one share of MSC (now EHI) common stock (par value $0.001 per share) and a warrant to purchase one share of MSC (now EHI) common stock exercisable on or before December 31, 2018 at a price of $5.00 per share. The units are being offered to an unlimited number of Accredited Investors until the earlier of the date upon which subscriptions for the maximum offering have been received and accepted; March 31, 2016, subject to a 60-day extension at the option of EHI; or the date upon which the offering is terminated by EHI. On March 24, 2016 the Company received proceeds of $6,725 from EHI as a result of subscriptions to the offering.

NOTE 15: RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As a result of the merger transaction described in Note 14 and in accordance with ASC 805-40-45, the Company has given retroactive effect to the transaction by adjusting the number of shares in the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ deficit and accompanying notes. The retroactive treatment changed the reported common shares and additional paid-in capital in the balance sheets, the shares used in the calculation of net loss per share and resulting net loss per share in the statements of operations, the number of shares and related dollar amounts in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and various disclosures regarding number of shares and related amounts in these notes to consolidated financial statements. There was no effect on the net loss or total stockholders’ deficit as a result of the restatement.

The change became effective on March 24, 2016 when the merger closed.

F-46

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

MARCH 31, 2016 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2015

  (Dollars in thousands,
except per share data)
 
  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $8,848  $1,962 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance  1,421   972 
Inventory, net of reserves  809   743 
Prepaid expenses  156   161 
Other current assets  -   130 
Total current assets  11,234   3,968 
Property and equipment, net  360   363 
Intangible assets, net  907   852 
Other assets  26   25 
Total non-current assets  1,293   1,240 
TOTAL ASSETS $12,527  $5,208 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Current portion of long-term debt $3,000  $3,175 
Debt - related parties  742   1,329 
Accounts payable  1,244   1,074 
Accrued expenses  687   503 
Accrued interest  58   40 
Deferred revenue  61   - 
Total current liabilities  5,792   6,121 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  -   - 
Total liabilities  5,792   6,121 
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Numbers of shares rounded to thousands)        
Ecoark, Inc. Series A, B, C, D Common Shares – exchanged for Ecoark Holdings shares in connection with March 24, 2016 merger (Restated)  -   30 
Ecoark Holdings, Inc. Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 31,436 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31,2016  31   - 
Additional paid-in-capital (Restated)  49,897   36,722 
Subscription receivable  (4,290)  (55)
Accumulated deficit  (38,810)  (36,587)
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,542 Ecoark Inc. Series A General Common Shares as of December 31, 2015 – canceled in connection with March 24, 2016 merger  -   (928)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) before non-controlling interest  6,828   (818)
Non-controlling interest  (93)  (95)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)  6,735   (913)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) $12,527  $5,208 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-47

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 AND 2015

  (Dollars in thousands,
except per share, data)
 
  2016  2015 
REVENUES      
Revenue from product sales $1,207  $1,483 
Revenue from services  757   742 
   1,964   2,225 
COST OF REVENUES        
Cost of product sales  1,182   1,417 
Cost of services  277   224 
   1,459   1,641 
GROSS PROFIT  505   584 
OPERATING EXPENSES:        
Salaries and salary related costs, including stock based compensation  1,020   812 
Professional fees and consulting  267   750 
General and administrative  517   590 
Depreciation and amortization  75   416 
Research and development  752   777 
Total operating expenses  2,631   3,345 
Loss from operations  (2,126)  (2,761)
         
OTHER EXPENSE:        
Interest expense, net of interest income  (95)  (206)
Loss before provision for income taxes  (2,221)  (2,967)
         
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  -   - 
NET LOSS  (2,221)  (2,967)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST  2   51 
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST $(2,223) $(3,018)
         
NET LOSS PER SHARE        
Basic $(0.08) $(0.13)
Diluted $(0.08) $(0.13)
         
SHARES USED IN CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE (Number of shares 
in thousands)
 
Basic  27,847   22,513 
Diluted  27,847   22,513 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-48

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2016

(Dollar amounts and number of shares in thousands)

     Additional           Non-    
  Common  Paid-In-  Subscription  Accumulated  Treasury  controlling    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Receivable  Deficit  Stock  Interest  Total 
                         
Balance at December 31, 2015 (Restated)  29,392  $30  $36,722   (55) $(36,587) $(928) $(95) $(913)
                                 
Re-issuance of treasury shares for cash, net of expenses  -   -   148           52       200 
                                 
Shares issued for cash in private placement, net of expenses  2,389   2   13,843   (4,290)              9,555 
                                 
Merger adjustments  (345)  (1)  (816)          876       59 
                                 
Collection of subscription receivable              55               55 
                                 
Net loss for the period                  (2,223)      2  $(2,221)
                                 
Balance at March 31, 2016  31,436  $31  $49,897  $(4,290) $(38,810) $-  $(93) $6,735 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-49

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTs OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 AND 2015

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2016  2015 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss attributable to controlling interest $(2,223) $(3,018)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  75   416 
Stock-based compensation - options  28   - 
Shares of common stock issued for services rendered  -   231 
Shares of treasury stock re-issued for services rendered  -   498 
Cash acquired in merger transaction  14   - 
Change in non-controlling interest on cash  2   51 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (449)  (174)
Inventory  (66)  14 
Prepaid expenses  5   18 
Other assets  130   (20)
Accounts payable  152   283 
Accrued expenses  140   284 
Accrued interest  18   118 
Deferred revenue  61   (142)
Net cash used in operating activities  (2,113)  (1,441)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchases of property and equipment  (49)  (8)
Net cash used in investing activities  (49)  (8)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of fees  9,555   - 
Collection of subscription receivable  55   31 
Re-issuance of treasury shares for cash, net of expenses  200   149 
Proceeds from the issuances of debt  185   - 
Repayments of debt  (360)  (176)
Proceeds from the issuances of debt - related parties      250 
Repayments of debt - related parties  (587)  (104)
Net cash provided by financing activities  9,048   150 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  6,886   (1,299)
Cash - beginning of the period  1,962   2,220 
Cash - end of the period $8,848  $921 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:        
Cash paid for interest $77  $90 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 
         
SUMMARY OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:        
Intangibles acquired in merger $77  $- 
Payables assumed in merger $59  $- 
Treasury stock re-purchased for release of guarantee $-  $393 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-50

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016

NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business and Organization

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (“Ecoark Holdings”) is an innovative and growth-oriented company founded in 2007 that develops and deploys intelligent technologies and products in order to meet the demand for sustainable, integrated solutions to contemporary business needs. Ecoark Holdings is a holding company that integrates the businesses of its subsidiaries to provide technological solutions in several industries that support ecological conservation through improvements in efficiency or reduction of waste.

Ecoark, Inc.(“Ecoark”) was founded in 2011 and is located in Rogers, Arkansas, the home office for Ecoark and Ecoark Holdings. Home office staff members are employees of Ecoark, which merged with Magnolia Solar on March 24, 2016 to create Ecoark Holdings as described further in Note 2 below. Ecoark is the parent company for Eco3D, Eco360, Pioneer Products and Intelleflex.

Eco3D, LLC (“Eco3D”) is located in Phoenix, Arizona and provides customers with the latest 3D technologies. Eco3D was formed by Ecoark in November 2013 and Ecoark owns 65% of the LLC. The remaining 35% is reflected as non-controlling interests. Eco3D provides 3D mapping, modeling, and consulting services for clients in retail, construction, healthcare, and multiple other industries throughout the United States and overseas. Eco3D is transitioning businesses from 2D technology that has existed for hundreds of years, to a world of digital 3D. Eco3D incorporates a variety of 3D technologies to achieve customer goals and objectives. Utilizing several techniques, Eco3D can capture existing conditions – topography, buildings, exterior/interior spaces, etc. – in highly accurate detail that allows for 2D and 3D measurement. These measurements form the basis for analysis, design, documentation, and quality control.

Eco360, LLC (“Eco360”) is located in Bentonville, Arkansas and is engaged in research and development activities. Eco360 was formed in November 2014 by Ecoark.

Pioneer Products, LLC (“Pioneer Products”) is located in Bentonville, Arkansas and is involved in the selling of recycled plastic products and other products. In addition to a strong and successful relationship with the world’s largest retailer, Pioneer Products also has vendor relationships with other key retailers. As such, Pioneer strategically leverages its role as a trusted supplier to these retailers with existing and new products. This subsidiary also recovers plastic waste from retail supply chains and creates new consumer products with the reclaimed materials. Pioneer Products was purchased by Ecoark in 2012.

Intelleflex Corporation (“Intelleflex”) is located in San Jose, California and provides food retailers and suppliers intelligent, on-demand solutions for retailers and companies that ship and store products for perishable food quality management. Intelleflex's ZEST Data Services is a secure, multi-tenant cloud-based data collection platform for aggregating and real-time permission-based sharing and analysis of information. ZEST Fresh, a fresh food management solution that utilizes the ZEST Data Service platform, focuses on three primary value propositions – consistent food quality, reduced waste, and improved food safety. ZEST Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence on every pallet. ZEST Delivery provides real-time monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food. Intelleflex was purchased by Ecoark in September 2013.

Magnolia Solar Inc.(“Magnolia Solar”) is located in Woburn, Massachusetts and is principally engaged in the development and commercialization of its nanotechnology-based, high-efficiency, thin-film technology that can be deposited on a variety of substrates, including glass and flexible structures. Magnolia merged with Ecoark on March 24, 2016 to create Ecoark Holdings as described further in Note 2 below.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ecoark Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “the Company”. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company is a holding company and holds one hundred percent of Eco360, Pioneer Products, Intelleflex and Magnolia Solar. Ecoark owns 65% of Eco3D and the remaining 35% interest is owned by executives of Eco3D.

F-51

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except when control does not rest with the parent. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8, the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree.

Noncontrolling Interests

In accordance with ASC 810-10-45,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,the Company classifies noncontrolling interests as a component of equity within the consolidated balance sheets. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2 and $51, respectively, is included in the Company’s net loss.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). It is Management's opinion, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accounting policies and procedures employed in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements have been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which are contained in the Company’s Form 8-K/A as filed with the SEC on May 10, 2016. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, contained herein, was derived from those consolidated financial statements. As a result of the merger transaction described in Note 2 and in accordance with ASC 805-40-45, the Company has given retroactive effect to certain share calculations by restating amounts for common shares and additional paid-in capital in the December 31, 2015 balance sheet.

Reclassification

The Company has reclassified certain amounts in the 2015 consolidated financial statements to comply with the 2016 presentation. These changes had no effect on the net loss for 2015.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, Management’s estimate of provisions required for non-collectible accounts receivable, obsolete or slow-moving inventory, and determination of the fair value of stock awards issued. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash

Cash consists of cash, demand deposits and money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventory cost is determined by specific identification on a first in first out basis, and provisions are made to reduce slow-moving, obsolete, or unusable inventories to their estimated useful or scrap values. The Company establishes reserves for this purpose.

Property and Equipment and Long-Lived Assets

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation on property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years for all classes of property and equipment, except leasehold improvements which are depreciated over the shorter of 10 years or the term of the lease.

FASB Codification Topic 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”), requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The application of ASC 360 has not materially affected the Company’s reported earnings, financial condition or cash flows.

F-52

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016

Intangible assets with definite useful lives are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets capitalized as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 represent the valuation of the Company-owned patents and customer lists. These intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated average useful lives of thirteen and a half years for the patents and three years for the customer lists. Expenditures on intangible assets through the Company’s filing of patent and trademark protection for Company-owned inventions are expensed as incurred.

The Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

1. Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;

2. Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and

3. Significant negative industry or economic trends.

When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows. The Company tested the carrying value of its intangible assets for recoverability. The projected undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value of these assets by a significant amount. The Company did not consider it necessary to record any impairment charges during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Advertising Expense

The Company expenses advertising costs, as incurred. Advertising expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 are included in general and administrative costs.

Software Costs

The Company accounts for software development costs in accordance with ASC 985-730,Software Research and Development, and ASC 985-20, Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed. ASC 985-20 requires that costs related to the development of the Company’s productsbe capitalized as an asset when incurred subsequent to the point at which technological feasibility of the enhancement is established. ASC 985-20 specifies that “technological feasibility” can only be established by the completion of a “detailed program design” or if no such design is prepared, upon the completion of a “working model” of the software. The Company’s development process does not include a detailed program design. Management believes that such a design could be produced in the early stages of development but would entail significant wasted expense and delay. Consequently, ASC 985-20 requires that development costs be recorded as an expense until the completion of a “working model”. In the Company’s case, the completion of a working model does not occur until shortly before the time when the software is ready for sale.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These costs include internal salaries and related costs and professional fees for activities related to development.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent events were evaluated through the date the consolidated financial statements were filed.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company reports shipping and handling revenues and their associated costs in revenue and cost of revenue, respectively. Shipping revenues and costs for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were nominal and are included in cost of product sales.

F-53

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016

Revenue Recognition

In regards to product revenue, product revenue primarily consists of the sale of electronic hardware, recycled plastics products, and recycled furniture. These subsidiaries recognize revenue when the following criteria have been met:

Evidence of an arrangement exists. The Company considers a customer purchase order, service agreement, contract, or equivalent document to be evidence of an arrangement.

Delivery has occurred. The Company’s standard transfer terms are free on board (“FOB”) shipping point. Thus, delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer at the time of shipment.

The fee is fixed or determinable.The Company considers the fee to be fixed or determinable if the fee is not subject to refund or adjustment and payment terms are standard, which is generally 30-60 days.

Collection is deemed reasonably assured. Collection is deemed reasonably assured if it is expected that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as payments become due. If it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, then revenue is deferred and recognized upon cash collection.

The Company for its software revenue will recognize revenues in accordance with ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition.

Revenue from software license agreements is recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery of the software has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. In software arrangements that include more than one element, the Company allocates the total arrangement fee among the elements based on the relative fair value of each of the elements.

License revenue allocated to software products generally is recognized upon delivery of the products or deferred and recognized in future periods to the extent that an arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and for which fair values have not been established. Revenue allocated to maintenance agreements is recognized ratably over the maintenance term and revenue allocated to training and other service elements is recognized as the services are performed. If evidence of fair value does not exist for all elements of a license agreement and post customer support (“PCS”) is the only undelivered element, then all revenue for the license arrangement is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement as license revenue. If evidence of fair value of all undelivered PCS elements exists but evidence does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue.

Cost of license revenue primarily includes product, delivery, and royalty costs. Cost of maintenance and service revenue consists primarily of labor costs for engineers performing implementation services, technical support, and training personnel as well as facilities and equipment costs.

The Company enters into arrangements that can include various combinations of software, services, and hardware. Where elements are delivered over different periods of time, and when allowed under U.S. GAAP, revenue is allocated to the respective elements based on their relative selling prices at the inception of the arrangement, and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. The Company uses a hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence, and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“ESP”). For software elements, the Company follows the industry specific software guidance which only allows for the use of VSOE in establishing fair value. Generally, VSOE is the price charged when the deliverable is sold separately or the price established by management for a product that is not yet sold if it is probable that the price will not change before introduction into the marketplace.

ESPs are established as best estimates of what the selling prices would be if the deliverables were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. The process for determining ESPs requires judgment and considers multiple factors that may vary over time depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable.

F-54

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016

When the arrangement with a customer includes significant production, modification, or customization of the software, we recognize the related revenue using the percentage-of-completion method in accordance with the accounting guidance and certain production-type contracts contained in ASC 605-35, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. We use the percentage of completion method provided all of the following conditions exist:

the contract includes provisions that clearly specify the enforceable rights regarding goods or services to be provided and received by the parties, the consideration to be exchanged and the manner and terms of settlement;

the customer can be expected to satisfy its obligations under the contract;

the Company can be expected to perform its contractual obligations; and

reliable estimates of progress towards completion can be made.

We measure completion based on achieving milestones detailed in the agreements with the customers. Costs of providing services, including services accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-35, are expensed as incurred.

Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company considers accounts receivable, net of allowance for returns and doubtful accounts, to be fully collectible. The allowance is based on Management’s estimate of the overall collectability of accounts receivable, considering historical losses and economic conditions. Based on these same factors, individual accounts are charged off against the allowance when Management determines those individual accounts are uncollectible. Credit extended to customers is generally uncollateralized. Past-due status is based on contractual terms. Management has determined that the allowance for doubtful accounts at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $0 and $2, respectively.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company follows ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”. This requires recognition and measurement of uncertain income tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” approach. Management evaluates their tax positions on an annual basis.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction and various state tax jurisdictions. The federal and state income tax returns of the Company are subject to examination by the IRS and state taxing authorities, generally for three years after they were filed.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company follows ASC 718-10“Share Based Payments”. The Company calculates compensation expense for all awards granted, but not yet vested, based on the grant-date fair values. Stock-based compensation expense for all awards granted is based on the grant-date fair values. The Company recognizes these compensation costs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, on a pro rata basis over the requisite service period of each vesting tranche of each award. The Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as trends of actual option forfeitures when estimating the forfeiture rate.

The Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee stock-based compensation under ASC 505-50, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”. The fair value of the option issued is used to measure the transaction, as this is more reliable than the fair value of the services received. The fair value is measured at the value of the Company’s common stock on the date that the commitment for performance by the counterparty has been reached or the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to expense and additional paid-in capital.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 825, "Financial Instruments," requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company's financial instruments: The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and accounts payable to related parties, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments.

Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews recoverability of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fixed assets to be disposed of by sale will be carried at the lower of the then current carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

F-55

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016

Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) include additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as convertible notes, preferred stock, stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants. Common stock equivalents are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reports a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for periods presented.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

Segment Information

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10,“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”.This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which Management disaggregates the Company in making internal operating decisions. In 2016 and 2015 the Company and its Chief Operating Decision Makers determined that the Company’s operations were divided into two segments: Products and Services. See Note 11 for segment information disclosures.

Related PartyRelated-Party Transactions

 

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal stockholders of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal stockholders of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal where one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all related partymaterial related-party transactions. All transactions shall be recorded at fair value of the goods or services exchanged. Property purchased from a related party is recorded at the cost to the related party and any payment to or on behalf of the related party in excess of the cost is reflected as compensation or distribution to related parties depending on the transaction.

F-12

 

The Company entered into a 10-year, renewable, exclusive license with Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc. (“Magnolia Optical”) on April 30, 2008 for the exclusive rights of the technology related to the application of Magnolia Optical’s solar cell technology. Magnolia Optical shares common Directors with the Company.ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company recorded the net license fee of $77 in conjunction with the merger described in Note 2 below. Amortization will continue over the remaining 23 months of the term. The Company’s management has determined that the fair value of the license approximates the book value and thus no impairment is necessary as of March(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016.2020

 

Recently IssuedAdopted Accounting StandardsPronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02 and later updated with ASU 2019-01 in March 2019Leases (Topic 842).ASU 2016-02 changesThe ASU’s change the accounting for leased assets, principally by requiring balance sheet recognition of assets under lease arrangements. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

F-56

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016

 

During August 2014,In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “2018-07PresentationCompensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU is intended to simplify aspects of Financial Statements—Going Concern.” The provisions of ASU 2014-15 require managementshare-based compensation issued to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concernnon-employees by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically,making the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principlesguidance consistent with accounting for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubtemployee share-based compensation. It is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annualreporting periods, and interim periods thereafter.within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing theadopted ASU 2018-07 effective April 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material impact of this ASU on the Company’sour consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2014,January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “2017-04Revenue from Contracts with CustomersIntangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 606)350), which supersedesSimplifying the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, and most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchangeTest for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. Goodwill Impairment.The amendments in ASU 2014-09 will be applied using onethis update are required for public business entities that have goodwill reported in their financial statements and have not elected the private company alternative for the subsequent measurement of two retrospective methods.goodwill. The effective date will beupdate is intended to simplify the first quarter ofannual or interim goodwill impairment test. A public business entity that is a U.S. SEC filer must adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal year endingyears beginning after December 31, 2018.15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company hasadopted ASU 2017-04 effective April 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not determined the potential effectshave a material impact on itsour consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

There were other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Going ConcernLiquidity

The Company commenced operations in 2007, and has experienced typical start-up costs and losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $38,810 since inception. The accumulated deficit as well as recurring losses of $2,223 forFor the three monthsyear ended March 31, 2016, and $10,502 and $14,135 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively and the working capital deficit of $2,153 as of December 31, 2015, have resulted in the uncertainty of2019, the Company to continue as a going concern even though working capital increased to a surplus of $5,442 at March 31, 2016.

These consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared assumingdisclosed that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable period of time.

The Company plans to raise additional capital to carry out its business plan and following a reverse merger transaction on March 24, 2016, the Company received $9,555(see Note 2). The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through future equity and debt securities issuances is unknown. Obtaining additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, ultimately, to profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raisesthere was substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. concern to carry out its business plan. For the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had a net loss of $12,137 and $13,650, respectively, and has an accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2020 of $128,023. As of March 31, 2020, the Company has $406 in cash and cash equivalents

The Company alleviated the substantial doubt regarding this uncertainty as of March 31, 2020 as a result of the Company’s acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020 which bring revenue generating subsidiaries with reserves of oil properties over $6 million and existing customer relationships over $2 million, coupled with the raising of over $6 million in the exercise of warrants and the entering into a secured funding of $35 million for accretive cash flow producing oil assets for its new business venture with Banner Midstream

If the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities, its stockholders would experience dilution. Additional debt financing, if available, may involve covenants restricting its operations or its ability to incur additional debt. Any additional debt financing or additional equity that the Company raises may contain terms that are not favorable to it or its stockholders and require significant debt service payments, which diverts resources from other activities. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing, it may be required to significantly scale back its business and operations. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital will also be impacted by the recent outbreak of COVID-19.

Based on this acquisition, company-wide consolidation, and management’s plans, the Company believes that the current cash on hand and anticipated cash from operations is sufficient to conduct planned operations for one year from the issuance of the consolidated financial statementsstatements.

Impact of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of the uncertainties.COVID-19

 

The recent outbreak of COVID-19, which has been declared by the World Health Organization to be a pandemic, has spread across the globe and is impacting worldwide economic activity. A pandemic, including COVID-19, or other public health epidemic poses the risk that the Company or its employees, suppliers, and other partners may be prevented from conducting business activities at full capacity for an indefinite period of time, including due to spread of the disease within these groups or due to shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities. While it is not possible at this time to estimate the impact that COVID-19 could have on the Company’s business, the continued spread of COVID-19 and the measures taken by the governments of countries affected and in which the Company operates could disrupt the operation of the Company’s business. The COVID-19 outbreak and mitigation measures may also have an adverse impact on global economic conditions, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition, including on its potential to conduct financings on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. In addition, the Company may take temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of the virus to its employees, including temporarily requiring all employees to work remotely, and discouraging employee attendance at in-person work-related meetings, which could negatively affect the Company’s business. The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak impacts the Company’s results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severity of the virus and the actions to contain its impact.

F-57

F-13

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20162020

 

NOTE 2: MERGERDISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

On January 29, 2016, Ecoark entered intoAs a Merger Agreement (“Merger Agreement”) withresult of receiving letters of intent for the sale of key assets of Sable, Pioneer and Magnolia Solar, Corporation (“MSC”) providing, among other things,and the approval by the Company’s Board in May 2018 to sell the assets, those assets were included in assets held for the acquisitionsale and their operations included in discontinued operations. All discontinued operations have been sold or ceased operations by May 31, 2019, so there are no remaining assets or liabilities of the Company by MSC in a share for share exchange pursuant to which it was contemplated that at the closing Ecoark shareholders would own approximately 95% of the outstanding shares of MSC. On March 18, 2016, in a special meeting called by MSC, the shareholders of MSC approved proposals necessary to complete the Merger (“Merger”).discontinued operations.

 

On March 24, 2016, the Merger was closed. Upon closingCarrying amounts of the transaction, under the Merger Agreement, Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corporation merged with and into Ecoark, with Ecoark as the surviving corporation, which became a wholly-owned subsidiarymajor classes of MSC. Thereafter, MSC changed its name to Ecoark Holdings, Inc. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger; for accounting purposes Ecoark acquired the assets and liabilities classified as held for sale and included as part of Magnolia Solar effective March 24, 2016. The historical financial information presented prior to March 24, 2016 is that of Ecoark.

Further, the Articles of Incorporation were amended to increase the authorized shares of common stock to 100,000 shares, to effect the creation of 5,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock, and to approve a reverse stock split of the MSC common stock of 1 for 250.

After the Merger, the Company had 29,049 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The MSC’s shareholders and holders of debt, notes, warrants and options received an aggregate of 1,353 shares of the Company’s common stock and Ecoark’s shareholders received an aggregate of 27,696 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On March 24, 2016, FINRA corporate action announced the reverse split and the name change which became effectivediscontinued operations in the market on March 28, 2016. Following that, the Company stock trades under the symbol “EARK.” All actions to close the Merger were completed in March 2016.

In conjunction with the Merger, MSC offered units consisting of a share and a warrant at a price of $4.00 per unit for a maximum of $20,000 in a private placement offering. Each unit consists of one share of MSC (now Ecoark Holdings) common stock (par value $0.001 per share) and a warrant to purchase one share of MSC (now Ecoark Holdings) common stock exercisable on or before December 31, 2018 at a price of $5.00 per share. The units were offered to an unlimited number of Accredited Investors until the earlier of the date upon which subscriptions for the maximum offering had been received and accepted; March 31, 2016, subject to a 60-day extension at the option of Ecoark Holdings; or the date upon which the offering was terminated by the Company. Through March 31, 2016 the Company received proceeds of $9,555 as a result of subscriptions to the offering. The offering was terminated on April 28, 2016.

NOTE 3:INVENTORY

Inventory, net of reserves, consisted of the followingconsolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015:

  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Inventory $1,429  $1,363 
Inventory Reserves  (620)  (620)
Total $809  $743 

NOTE 4:PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment2019 consisted of the following as of March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015:following:

 

  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Furniture and fixtures $114  $110 
Computers and software costs  425   382 
Machinery and equipment  478   476 
Leasehold improvements  4   4 
Total property and equipment  1,021   972 
Accumulated depreciation  (661)  (609)
Property and equipment, net $360  $363 
  2019 
Other current assets $23 
Current assets – held for sale $23 
     
Accounts payable $23 
Accrued liabilities  11 
Current liabilities – held for sale $34 

 

Depreciation expenseMajor line items constituting income (loss) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for the three monthsyear ended March 31, 20162019 related to Sable, Pioneer and 2015 was $52Magnolia consisted of the following:

  2019 
Revenue $9,883 
Cost of revenue  10,515 
Gross (loss)  (632)
Operating expenses  1,668 
Loss from discontinued operations $(2,300)
Non-cash expenses $452 

Non-cash expenses above consist principally of depreciation, amortization and $67, respectively. There was no impairment on these assets in 2016 or 2015.costs. Capital expenditures of discontinued operations were principally at Sable and amounted to $268 for fiscal 2019.

 

Gain on the sale of Sable assets of $57 in March 2019 was recognized in discontinued operations.

Pursuant to ASC 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements – Discontinued Operations, ASC-20-45-1B, paragraph 360-10-45-15, Pinnacle Vac will be disposed of other than by sale via an abandonment and termination of operations with no intent to classify the entity or assets as Available for Sale. Pursuant to ASC 205-20-45-3A, the results of operations of Pinnacle Vac from inception to discontinuation of operations will be reclassified to a separate component of income, below Net Income/(Loss), as a Loss on Discontinued Operations.

F-58

F-14

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20162020

All of the equipment assets of Pinnacle Vac and the related loan liabilities will be subsequently transitioned into Capstone to continue servicing the debt. The remaining current assets of Pinnacle Vac will be used to settle any outstanding current liabilities of Pinnacle Vac. A loss contingency will be recorded if any of the outstanding liabilities or obligations of Pinnacle Vac resulting from this abandonment are reasonably estimable and likely to be incurred.

Banner Midstream made the decision to discontinue the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Pinnacle Vac Service LLC (“Pinnacle Vac”), effective October 31, 2018 due to the inability of Pinnacle Vac’s management to develop a sustainable, profitable business model. The managerial staff of Pinnacle Vac was terminated on November 15, 2018 and Pinnacle Vac’s rental facility at Sligo Rd was vacated on November 15, 2018.

Carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2020 for Pinnacle Vac consisted of the following:

Property and equipment, net $249 
Non-current assets $249 
     
Accounts payable $228 
Current liabilities $228 

There was no income (loss) from discontinued operations for the period March 28, 2020 through March 31, 2020.

After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has recorded a full valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of realizing income tax benefit for all periods presented, and the income tax provision for all periods presented was considered immaterial. Thus, no separate tax provision or benefit relating to discontinued operations is included here or on the face of the consolidated statements of operations.

 

NOTE 5: INTANGIBLE ASSETS3: REVENUE

The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which the Company early adopted effective April 1, 2017. No cumulative adjustment to accumulated deficit was required, and the early adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, as no material arrangements prior to the adoption were impacted by the new pronouncement.

 

The following is a summary of intangible assets as oftable disaggregates the Company’s revenue by major source for the years ended March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015:31:

 

  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Customer lists $3,980  $3,980 
Patents and licenses  1,090   1,013 
Total intangible assets  5,070   4,993 
Accumulated amortization  (4,163)  (4,141)
Intangible assets, net $907  $852 
  2020  2019 
Revenue:      
Walmart $         -  $1,000 
Software as a Service (“SaaS”)  28   62 
Professional Services  145   - 
Financial Services  175   - 
Oil and Gas Services  225   - 
Equipment rental  4   - 
Fuel rebate  4   - 
  $581  $1,062 

 

Amortization expense forRevenues in the three monthsyear ended March 31, 20162019 were principally from a project with Walmart. After paying invoices for $1,000 through June, Walmart has not paid the final $500. As a result, the Company had established an allowance for doubtful accounts of $500 and 2015subsequently wrote off the allowance against the receivable when it was $22 and $349, respectively. There was no impairment on these assetsdetermined that this receivable would not be collected despite the performance obligation satisfied. Zest SaaS revenues in 2016 or 2015.

NOTE 6: CURRENT PORTION OF LONG-TERM DEBT

The following is a summary of long-term debt as of March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015:

    March 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
Note payable – Celtic Bank (a) $-  $175 
Note payable – B&B Merritt (b)  3,000   3,000 
Total   $3,000  $3,175 

(a)Fifteen year note payable dated July 11, 2007 in the original principal amount of $1,250 with a bank guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration with Pioneer, prior to the acquisition of Pioneer by the Company. Note accrued interest at the Prime Rate plus 2% (Prime rate 3.25% plus 2% for 2015). The note was fully paid in January 2016.
(b)Note payable bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum, unsecured, with quarterly interest payments commencing in January 2015, with the note maturing in October 2016. Upon maturity or anytime prior, so long as the Company has not exercised its right to prepay this note, the lender can exercise its option to convert this note to equity in the Company, with 30 day advance written notice, and acquire up to 3,000 unrestricted Class A Common Shares of Ecoark at $1.00 per share, which consistent with the Merger Agreement is now 1,500 shares of Ecoark Holdings at $2.00 per share. The principal amount along with any accrued interest thereon, if converted to equity shall be deemed fully paid. As of March 31, 2016, no conversions of this debt have occurred. There was no bifurcation of the conversion option as the conversion is deemed to be conventional in nature.

Interest expense on the long-term debt for the three monthsyears ended March 31, 20162020 and 20152019 were $75from retailers and $77, respectively.produce growers. There were no significant contract asset or contract liability balances for all periods presented. The Company does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less and (ii) contracts for which we recognize revenue at the amount to which we have the right to invoice for services performed.

 

Subsequent to the acquisitions of Trend Discovery and Banner Midstream, the Company in 2020 recorded revenues for financial services and oil and gas services and production. For both of these entities, revenues are billed upon the completion of the performance obligations.

Collections of the amounts billed are typically paid by the customers within 30 to 60 days.

F-59

F-15

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20162020

 

NOTE 7: DEBT – RELATED PARTIES4: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of March 31:

  2020  2019 
Zest Labs freshness hardware $2,493  $2,493 
Computers and software costs  222   222 
Leasehold improvements – Pinnacle Frac  18   - 
Machinery and equipment - Technology  200   200 
Machinery and equipment – Commodity  3,405   - 
Total property and equipment  6,338   2,915 
Accumulated depreciation and impairment  (2,373)  (2,091)
Property and equipment, net $3,965  $824 

As of March 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company performed an evaluation of the recoverability of these long-lived assets. The following is a summaryanalysis resulted in an impairment of debt – related parties$1,139 which was recorded as of March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015:2019 related to these assets.

 

     March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Promissory note – related party  (a)   -  $50 
Promissory note #1 – CEO  (b)  $25   62 
Promissory note #2 – CEO  (c)   717   1,217 
Total     $742  $1,329 

The Company acquired $3,423 in property and equipment on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream.

(a)Unsecured note payable to former shareholder bearing interest at 5% per annum, with monthly principal and interest payments beginning in November 2014, maturing in November 2016. Note was paid in full in March 2016.
(b)Note payable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Randy May. On November 30, 2015, after monthly payments were being made, and additional amounts funded in March 2015 and May 2015 totaling $600, the Company combined these amounts into a new one year promissory note in the amount of $3,197 due November 30, 2016. Payments of $37 were made on this note in the first quarter of 2016.
(c)Note payable with the Company’s CEO commencing November 30, 2015 at an interest rate of 6% per annum (see note b). The beginning principal balance of $3,197 was reduced by $1,980 on December 31, 2015 in exchange for 1,100 shares of Ecoark Series A General Common Shares that were Treasury Shares owned by the Company. The remaining principal balance matures in November 2016. Payments of $500 were made on this note in the first quarter of 2016.

 

InterestDepreciation expense on the debt – related parties for the three monthsyears ended March 31, 20162020 and 20152019 was $20$286 and $44,$672, respectively.

 

NOTE 8: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)5: INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

 

OnIntangible assets consisted of the following as of March 24, 2016, Ecoark Series A, B, C,31:

  2020  2019 
Patents $1,013  $1,013 
Customer relationships  2,100   - 
Non-compete agreements  250   - 
Outsourced vendor relationships  340   340 
Non-compete agreements  1,017   1,017 
Total intangible assets  4,720   2,370 
Accumulated amortization and impairment  (2,370)  (2,370)
Intangible assets, net $2,350  $- 

All intangible assets prior to the acquisition of Banner Midstream were fully impaired as of March 31, 2019. Those intangible assets related to the outsourced vendor relationships and D Common Sharesnon-compete agreements were exchanged for Ecoarkrecorded as part of the acquisition of 440labs. Goodwill of $3,222 was recorded in the Trend Holdings Common Sharesacquisition, and $7,003 was recorded in the Banner Midstream acquisition as more fully described in Note 2 above. The Ecoark Common Shares, including Treasury Shares were canceled after15.

In the exchange.acquisition of Banner Midstream, the Company acquired the customer relationships and non-compete agreements valued at $2,350. There was no amortization in the 4 days March 28, 2020 through March 31, 2020.

 

As a resultof March 31, 2020, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the merger transaction and in accordance with ASC 805-40-45,remaining intangible assets of the Company has given retroactive effectand determined that no additional impairment was necessary.

Amortization expense for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $0 and $553, respectively.

In addition to certain share calculations by restating amounts for common shares and additional paid-in capitalthe statutory based intangible assets noted above, the Company incurred $10,225 in the December 31, 2015 balance sheet.purchase of Trend and Banner Midstream as follows:

 

Ecoark Holdings Preferred Stock

On March 18, 2016, the Company created 5,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock. No preferred shares have been issued.

Acquisition – Trend Discovery $3,222 
Acquisition – Banner Midstream  7,003 
Goodwill – March 31, 2020 $10,225 

 

Ecoark Holdings Common Stock

As described in Note 2 above, 100,000 sharesThe Company assessed the criteria for impairment, and there were no indicators of common stock, par value $0.001 were authorized on March 18, 2016. At the merger, the Company had 29,049 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The MSC’s shareholders and holders of debt, notes, warrants and options received an aggregate of 1,353 shares of the Company’s common stock and Ecoark’s shareholders received an aggregate of 27,696 shares of the Company’s common stock.The Company also issued 2,387 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to a private placement offering described in Note 2. See Note 12 below for issuances in April. Total shares issued and outstandingimpairment present as of March 31, 2016 was 31,436.2020, and therefore no impairment is necessary.

 

Stock OptionsF-16

On February 16, 2013, the Board of Directors of Ecoark approved the EcoArk Inc. 2013 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”).The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants, and to promote the success of the Company’s business. The Plan is expected to contribute to the attainment of these objectives by offering employees, directors and consultants the opportunity to acquire stock ownership interests in the Company, and other rights with respect to stock of the Company, and to thereby provide them with incentives to put forth maximum efforts for the success of the Company.

F-60

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20162020

 

Awards under this Plan were only granted in the form of nonstatutory stock options (“Options”) to purchase the Company's Series C Stock prior to the merger with MSC. Upon the consummation of the merger, all outstanding stock options previously granted by Ecoark, were canceled and new stock options in Ecoark Holdings were issued as replacements, with the same terms of the originally issued Series C Stock Options granted by Ecoark under the 2013 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “2013 Plan”). Under the 2013 Plan, the Company may grant options to purchase up to 5,500 shares of common stock to be granted to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. The vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates will be established by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Company at the date of grant, but incentive stock options may be subject to earlier termination, as provided in the 2013 Plan.NOTE 6: OTHER LIABILITIES

 

In May 2014, Ecoark granted Stock OptionsAccrued liabilities consisted of the following as of March 31:

  2020  2019 
Professional fees and consulting costs $106  $150 
Vacation and paid time off  126   345 
Legal fees  503   108 
Compensation  865   50 
Interest  673   11 
Insurance  548   - 
Other  215   174 
Total $3,036  $828 

On March 27, 2020, the Company assumed $2,362 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream, and in addition, assumed $2,362 in amounts that are due to purchase 693 sharesprior owners of Banner Midstream and their subsidiaries. These amounts are non-interest bearing and due on demand. As of March 31, 2020, $2,358 of the amounts due to various employees and consultantsprior owners is currently due. $900 of Ecoark. The Stock Options had an exercise price of $1.25 per share and have a term of 10 years. The Stock Options vest over a three-year period as follows: 25% immediately; 25% on the first anniversary date; 25% on the second anniversary date; and 25% on the third anniversary date. During 2015 Ecoark issued additional Stock Options on 625 shares of common stock. Therefore, at the end of 2015, Stock Options were outstandingamounts due to purchase 1,318 shares of common stock. The total original number of 1,318 Ecoark Stock Options have been divided by two in conjunction with changes required by the Merger Agreementprior owners was repaid ($75) and converted to Stock Options of the Company, and at present options on 659 shares of the Company are outstanding with an adjusted exercise price of $2.50.

Management valued the Stock Options utilizing the Black-Scholes Method, with the following criteria: stock price - $2.50; exercise price - $2.50; expected term – 10 years; discount rate – 0.25%; and volatility – 100%.

The Company records stock based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, and has recorded stock based compensation of $28 and $91 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The 2,450 Stock Options of MSC were converted($825) into shares of common stock in accordance with the Merger Agreement with Ecoark.May 2020.

 

WarrantsNOTE 7: WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

The Company issued common stock and warrants in several private placements in March 2017, May 2017, March 2018 and August 2018. The March and May 2017 and March and August 2018 warrants (collectively the “Derivative Warrant Instruments”) are classified as liabilities. The Derivative Warrant Instruments have been accounted for utilizing ASC 815“Derivatives and Hedging”.The Company has incurred a liability for the estimated fair value of Derivative Warrant Instruments. The estimated fair value of the Derivative Warrant Instruments has been calculated using the Black-Scholes fair value option-pricing model with key input variables provided by management, as of the date of issuance, with changes in fair value recorded as gains or losses on revaluation in other income (expense).

MSC had

The Company identified embedded features in the March and May 2017 warrants which caused the warrants to be classified as a liability. These embedded features included the implicit right for the holders to request that the Company settle the warrants in registered shares. Since maintaining an effective registration of shares is potentially outside the control of the Company, these warrants were classified as liabilities as opposed to equity. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company treat the whole instrument as liability and record the fair value of the instrument as derivatives as of the inception date of the instrument and to adjust the fair value of the instrument as of each subsequent balance sheet date.

On October 28, 2019, the Company issued 2,243 shares of the Company’s common stock to investors in exchange for the March and May 2017 warrants. Upon the issuance of the 2,243 shares, the March and May 2017 warrants were extinguished. The fair value of the shares issued was $2,186, and the fair value of the warrants was $1,966 resulting in a loss of $220 that was recognized on the exchange.

The Company identified embedded features in the March and August 2018 warrants which caused the warrants to be classified as a liability. These embedded features included the right for the holders to request that the Company cash settle the warrant instruments from the holder by paying to the holder an amount of cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of the remaining unexercised portion of the Derivative Warrant Instruments on the date of the consummation of a fundamental transaction. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company treat the whole instrument as liability and record the fair value of the instrument as derivatives as of the inception date of the instrument and to adjust the fair value of the instrument as of each subsequent balance sheet date.

On July 12, 2019, the March and August 2018 warrants were exchanged for 4,277 shares of Company common stock, and all of those warrants were extinguished. The fair value of the shares issued was $3,293, and the fair value of the warrants was $2,455 resulting in a loss of $840 that was recognized on the exchange.

As described further in Note 11 below, on August 22, 2019 the Company issued warrants that can be exercised in exchange for 3,7853,922 shares of Company common stock to investors that were convertedinvested in shares of Company preferred stock. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $1,576 at inception and on January 26, 2020, the Company entered into letter agreements with accredited institutional investors holding the warrants issued with the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock on August 21, 2019. Pursuant to the agreements, the investors agreed to a cash exercise of 3,921 of the warrants at a price of $0.51. The Company additionally, granted 5,882 warrants at $0.90. On January 27, 2020, the Company received approximately $2,000 in cash from the exercise of the August 2019 warrants and issued the January 2020 warrants to the investors, which have an exercise price of $0.90 and may be exercised within five years of issuance. This transaction resulted in a loss on extinguishment of $1,038.

On November 11, 2019, the Company issued warrants that can be exercised to purchase a number of shares of common stock in accordance with the Merger Agreement with Ecoark.

In March 2016, the Company issued warrants for 2,389 shares in accordance with the private placement. As indicated in the subsequent events, the private placement was completed on April 28, 2016, and additional warrants were issued at the closing. These warrants have a strike price of $5.00 per share and expire on December 31, 2018. As of March 31, 2016, they are the only warrants the Company has outstanding.

NOTE 9: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The Company leases many of its operating and office facilities for various terms under long-term, non-cancelable operating lease agreements. These leases expire at various dates through 2019. Rent expense was approximately $98 and $71 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. Future minimum lease payments required under the operating leases are as follows: 2016 - $270, 2017 - $310, 2018 - $296 and 2019 - $155.

Contract Related Fees

Prior to the Merger, a subsidiary of the Company as partequal to the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the contract to develop its products, has agreed to pay the contractor 1.5% of future New York state manufactured sales, and 5% of future non-New York state manufactured sales until the entire funds paidSeries C Preferred Stock purchased by the contractor have been repaid, or 15 years, whichever comes first. Asinvestors. The fair value of March 31, 2016, the subsidiary has $1,252 of contract related expenses, all of which willthose warrants was estimated to be owed to the contractor, contingent upon the sale of the subsidiary’s product related to that contract.

The Company has determined that a liability has not been accrued because management has determined that it is not probable sales will occur prior to the 15 year expiration of the obligation.

Settlement

In March 2016 the Company agreed to settle a dispute regarding a contract. The agreement required the Company to pay $100 to certain parties within 30 days of the agreement. The amount was recorded as an operating expense$1,107 at inception and included in accrued expenses$543 as of March 31, 2016.2020. The amount was paid in April 2016.

Company recognized $107 of interest expense related to the fair value of the warrants at inception that exceeded the proceeds received for the preferred stock on November 11, 2019.

F-61

F-17

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2016

NOTE 10: PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES2020

 

The provision (benefit) for income taxes forCompany determined our derivative liabilities to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and used the three monthsBlack-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value as of March 31, 2020. The Black-Scholes model requires six basic data inputs: the exercise or strike price, time to expiration, the risk-free interest rate, the current stock price, the estimated volatility of the stock price in the future, and the dividend rate. Changes to these inputs could produce a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The fair value of each warrant is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following assumptions were used in March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 and at inception:

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  March 31,
2020
  March 31,
2019
  Inception 
          
Expected term  4.67- 4.83 years   3.00 - 4.42 years   5.00 years 
Expected volatility  95%  96%  91% - 107%
Expected dividend yield  -   -   - 
Risk-free interest rate  0.70%  2.23%  1.50% - 2.77%

The Company’s derivative liabilities associated with the warrants are as follows:

  March 31, 2020  March 31,
2019
  Inception 
Fair value of 1,000 March 17, 2017 warrants $-  $256  $4,609 
Fair value of 1,850 May 22, 2017 warrants  -   505   7,772 
Fair value of 2,565 March 16, 2018 warrants  -   1,040   3,023 
Fair value of 2,969 August 14, 2018 warrants  -   1,303   2,892 
Fair value of 3,922 August 22, 2019 warrants  -   -   1,576 
Fair value of 1,379 November 11, 2019 warrants  543   -   1,107 
Fair value of 5,882 January 27, 2020 warrants  2,232   -   3,701 
  $2,775  $3,104     

During the years ended March 31, 20162020 and 2015 differs from the amount which would be expected as a result of applying the statutory tax rates to the losses before income taxes due primarily to the valuation allowance to fully reserve net deferred tax assets.

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon sufficient future taxable income during the period that deductible temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable income. As the achievement of required future taxable income is uncertain,2019 the Company recorded a valuation allowance.

  As of
March 31, 2016
  As of
December 31, 2015
 
Deferred tax assets:      
Net operating loss before non-deductible items $(38,244) $(36,028)
Tax rate  34%  34%
Total deferred tax assets  13,003   12,250 
Less: Valuation allowance  (13,003)  (12,250)
         
Net deferred tax assets $-  $- 

recognized changes in the fair value of the derivative liabilities of $(369) and $3,160, respectively. As described in Note 11 below, the March and May 2017 warrants, March and August 2018 warrants and the August 2019 warrants were exchanged and thus were no longer outstanding as of March 31, 2016,2020. The November 2019 and January 2020 warrants were exercised in May 2020.

Activity related to the Company has a net operating loss carry forward of $38,244 expiring through 2036. The Company has provided a valuation allowance againstwarrant derivative liabilities for the full amount of the deferred tax asset due to management’s uncertainty about its realization. Furthermore, the net operating loss carry forward may be subject to further limitation pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The valuation allowance was increased by $753 in the three monthsyear ended March 31, 2016.2020 is as follows:

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2019 $3,104 
Issuances of warrants – derivative liabilities  6,384 
Warrants exchanged for common stock  (6,344)
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities  (369)
Ending balance as of March 31, 2020 $2,775 

 

nOTE 11: SEGMENT INFORMATIONNOTE 8: OIL AND CONCENTRATIONSGAS PROPERTIES

 

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10, “Disclosures about Segments of an EnterpriseCompany’s holdings in oil and Related Information”. This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which Management disaggregates the Company in making operating decisions. Asgas mineral lease (“OGML”) properties as of March 31 2016 and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, theare as follows:

  2020  2019 
Property acquired from Shamrock $1,970  $- 
Properties acquired from White River  4,165   - 
Total OGML Properties $6,135  $- 

Cherry et al OGML including shallow drilling rights was acquired by Shamrock from Hartoil Company operates in two segments. The segments are Products (principally consisting of Pioneer Products’ operations consisting of sales of recycled plastic products) and Services (principally consisting of Eco3D’s mapping, modeling and consulting services business plus costs associated with developing Intelleflex and Eco360 solutions). Home office costs are allocated to the two segments based on the relative support provided to those segments.July 1, 2018.

 

March 31, 2016 Products  Services  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $1,207  $757  $1.964 
Cost of revenues  1,182   277   1,459 
Gross profit  25   480   505 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation and amortization, and interest expense, net  59   2,497   2,556 
Depreciation and amortization  -   75   75 
Interest expense, net  1   94   95 
Net (loss) applicable to common shares  (35)  (2,186)  (2,221)
Non-controlling interest  -   2   2 
Net (loss) – controlling interest $(35) $(2,188) $(2,223)
Segmented assets            
Property and equipment, net $-  $360  $360 
Intangible assets, net $15  $892  $907 
Capital expenditures $-  $49  $49 

March 31, 2015 Products  Services  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $1,483  $742  $2,225 
Cost of revenues  1,417   224   1,641 
Gross profit  66   518   584 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation and amortization, and interest expense, net  45   2,884   2,929 
Depreciation and amortization  332   84   416 
Interest expense, net  2   204   206 
Net (loss) applicable to common shares  (313)  (2,654)  (2,967)
Non-controlling interest  -   51   51 
Net (loss) – controlling interest $(313) $(2,705) $(3,018)
Segmented assets            
Property and equipment, net $-  $403  $403 
Intangible assets, net $661  $894  $1,555 
Capital expenditures $-  $8  $8 

O’Neal Family OGML and Weyerhaeuser OGML including shallow drilling rights were acquired by White River on July 1, 2019 from Livland, LLC and Hi-Tech Onshore Exploration, LLC respectively in exchange for a $125 drilling credit to be applied by Livland, LLC on subsequent drilling operations.

 

Taliaferro Family OGML including shallow drilling rights was acquired by White River on June 10, 2019 from Lagniappe Operating, LLC.

Kingrey Family OGML including both shallow and deep drilling rights was entered into by White River and the Kingrey Family on April 3, 2019.

F-62

F-18

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

Peabody Family OGML including both shallow and deep drilling rights was acquired by White River on June 18, 2019 from SR Acquisition I, LLC, a subsidiary of Sanchez Energy Corporation, for a 1% royalty retained interest in conjunction with White River executing a lease saving operation in June 2019.

Banner Midstream acquired the Cherry et al OGML via the Shamrock acquisition and the remaining OGML’s via the White River acquisition. The Company then acquired all of the OGML properties as part of the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

The following table summarizes the Company’s oil and gas activities by classification for the year ended March 31, 2020:

Activity Category March 31, 2019  Adjustments (1)  March 31, 2020 
Proved Developed Producing Oil and Gas Properties         
Cost $-  $167  $167 
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  -   -   - 
             
Total $-  $167  $167 
             
Undeveloped and Non-Producing Oil and Gas Properties            
Cost $-  $5,968  $5,968 
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  -   -   - 
             
Total $-  $5,968  $5,968 
             
Grand Total $      -  $6,135  $6,135 

(1)Pursuant to the preliminary asset allocation in Banner Midstream acquisition (See Note 15)

NOTE 9: LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following as of March 31:

  2020  2019 
Secured convertible promissory note – Ecoark Holdings (a) $-  $- 
Credit facility – Trend Discovery SPV 1, LLC (b)  -   1,350 
Senior secured bridge loan – Banner Midstream (c)  2,222   - 
Note payable – LAH 1 (d)  110   - 
Note payable – LAH 2 (e)  77   - 
Note payable – Banner Midstream 1 (f)  303   - 
Note payable – Banner Midstream 2 (g)  397   - 
Note payable – Banner Midstream 3 (h)  500   - 
Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) loan – Banner Midstream 1 (i)  361   - 
MCA loan – Banner Midstream 2 (j)  175   - 
MCA loan – Banner Midstream 3 (k)  28   - 
Note payable – Banner Midstream – Alliance Bank (l)  1,239   - 
Commercial loan – Pinnacle Frac – Firstar Bank (m)  952   - 
Auto loan 1 – Pinnacle Vac – Firstar Bank (n)  40   - 
Auto loan 2 – Pinnacle Frac – Firstar Bank (o)  52   - 
Auto loan 3 – Pinnacle Vac – Ally Bank (p)  42   - 
Auto loan 4 – Pinnacle Vac – Ally Bank (q)  47   - 
Auto loan 5 – Pinnacle Vac – Ally Bank (r)  44   - 
Auto loan 6 – Capstone – Ally Bank (s)  97   - 
Tractor loan 7 – Capstone – Tab Bank (t)  235   - 
Equipment loan – Shamrock – Workover Rig (u)  50   - 
Total long-term debt  6,971   1,350 
Less: debt discount  (149)  - 
Less: current portion  (6,401)  (1,350)
Long-term debt, net of current portion $421  $- 

(a)Ecoark Holdings had a secured convertible promissory note (“convertible note”) bearing interest at 10% per annum, entered into on January 10, 2017 for $500 with the principal due in one lump sum payment on or before July 10, 2018. The principal along with accrued interest of $11 was paid on July 2, 2018. Interest expense on the long-term debt for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $0 and $12, respectively.

F-19

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2020

(b)On December 28, 2018, the Company entered into a $10,000 credit facility that includes a loan and security agreement (the “Agreement”) where the lender agreed to make one or more loans to the Company, and the Company may make a request for a loan or loans from the lender, subject to the terms and conditions. The Company is required to pay interest biannually on the outstanding principal amount of each loan calculated at an annual rate of 12%. The loans are evidenced by demand notes executed by the Company. The Company is able to request draws from the lender up to $1,000 with a cap of $10,000, including the $1,000 advanced on December 28, 2018 and an additional $350 advanced through March 31, 2019, resulting in a balance of $1,350 at March 31, 2019. An additional $1,137 was advanced during the year ended March 31, 2020; and $38 of commitment fees, to bring the balance of the notes payable to $2,525 at March 31, 2020. Loans made pursuant to the Agreement are secured by a security interest in the Company’s collateral held with the lender and guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiary, Zest Labs.

The Company pays to the lender a commitment fee on the principal amount of each loan requested thereunder in the amount of 3.5% of the amount thereof. The Company also paid an arrangement fee of $300 to the lender which was paid upon execution of the Agreement. The aforementioned fees were and are netted from proceeds advanced and are recorded as interest expense. Zest Labs is a plaintiff in a litigation styled asZest Labs, Inc. vs Walmart, Inc., Case Number 4:18-cv-00500 filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (the “Zest Litigation”). The Company agrees that within five days of receipt by Zest Labs or the Company of any settlement proceeds from the Zest Litigation, the Company will pay or cause to be paid over to lender an additional fee in an amount equal to (i) 0.50 multiplied by (ii) the highest aggregate principal balance of the loans over the life of the loans through the date of the payment from settlement proceeds; provided, however, that such additional fee shall not exceed the amount of the settlement proceeds.

Subject to customary carve-outs, the Agreement contains customary negative covenants and restrictions for agreements of this type on actions by the Company including, without limitation, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, loans, consolidation, mergers, dissolution, asset dispositions outside the ordinary course of business, change in business and restriction on use of proceeds. In addition, the Agreement requires compliance by the Company of covenants including, but not limited to, furnishing the lender with certain financial reports and protecting and maintaining its intellectual property rights. The Agreement contains customary events of default, including, without limitation, non-payment of principal or interest, violation of covenants, inaccuracy of representations in any material respect and cross defaults with certain other indebtedness and agreements.

Interest expense on the note for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $286 and $35, respectively.

On March 31, 2020, the Company converted all principal and interest in the Trend Discovery SPV I, LLC credit facility into shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion of $2,525 of principal and $290 of accrued interest resulted in the issuance of 3,855 shares of common stock at a value of $0.59 per share. This transaction resulted in a gain on conversion of $541. As a result of the conversion, there are no amounts outstanding as of March 31, 2020.

(c)Senior secured bridge loan of $2,222, containing a debt discount of $132 as of March 31, 2020. This was assumed in the Banner Midstream acquisition, and fully repaid in May 2020, and was secured by machinery and equipment of Pinnacle Frac. Accrued interest on this debt was $48 at March 31, 2020 of which $39 was assumed in the acquisition.

(d)Unsecured note payable previously issued April 2, 2018 which was assumed by Banner Midstream in the acquisition of a previous entity. The amount is past due and bears interest at 10% per annum. Accrued interest at March 31, 2020 is $22. This amount along with accrued interest of $22 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream.

(e)Unsecured note payable previously issued April 2, 2018 which was assumed by Banner Midstream in the acquisition of a previous entity. The amount is past due and bears interest at 10% per annum. Accrued interest at March 31, 2020 is $22. This amount along with accrued interest of $22 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream.

(f)Junior secured note payable issued January 16, 2019 to an unrelated third party at 10% interest. Accrued interest at March 31, 2020 is $40. This amount along with accrued interest of $39 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream. This note was repaid in May 2020.

(g)Unsecured notes payable issued in June and July 2019 to an unrelated third party at 10% interest. There are three notes to this party in total. Accrued interest on these notes at March 31, 2020 is $30. This amount along with accrued interest of $29 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream. These notes were converted in May 2020.

F-20

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2020

(h)Unsecured note payable issued October 2019 to an unrelated third party at 10% interest. Accrued interest on this note at March 31, 2020 is $24. This amount along with accrued interest of $23 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream.

(i)Merchant cash advance loan on Banner Midstream. Accrued interest on this note at March 31, 2020 is $141. The Company assumed $368 of this note along with accrued interest of $144. A total of $7 of principal and $3 of accrued interest was paid between March 28, 2020 and March 31, 2020. This note was repaid in May 2020.

(j)Merchant cash advance loan on Banner Midstream. Accrued interest on this note at March 31, 2020 is $68. The Company assumed $181 of this note along with accrued interest of $70. A total of $6 of principal and $2 of accrued interest was paid between March 28, 2020 and March 31, 2020. This note was repaid in May 2020.

(k)Merchant cash advance loan on Banner Midstream. Accrued interest on this note at March 31, 2020 is $12. The Company assumed $69 of this note along with accrued interest of $21. A total of $2 of principal and $1 of accrued interest was paid between March 28, 2020 and March 31, 2020. This note was repaid in May 2020.

(l)Original loan date of June 14, 2019 with an original maturity date of April 14, 2020. The Company extended this loan for $1,239 at 4.95% with a new maturity date of April 14, 2025. Debt discount on this loan at March 31, 2020 was $16. This loan and discount was assumed in the Banner Midstream acquisition.

(m)Original loan date of February 28, 2018, due July 28, 2020 at 4.5% interest. This loan was assumed in the Banner Midstream acquisition.

(n)On July 20, 2018, Pinnacle Vac Service entered into a long-term secured note payable for $56 for a service truck maturing July 20, 2023. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 6.50% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2020. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(o)On August 3, 2018, Pinnacle Frac Transport entered into a long-term secured note payable for $73 for a service truck maturing August 3, 2023. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 6.50% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2020. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(p)On July 18, 2018, Pinnacle Vac Service entered into a long-term secured note payable for $56 for a service truck maturing August 17, 2024. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 9.00% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2020. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(q)On July 26, 2018, Pinnacle Vac Service entered into a long-term secured note payable for $54 for a service truck maturing September 9, 2024. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 7.99% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2020. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(r)On July 26, 2018, Pinnacle Vac Service entered into a long-term secured note payable for $54 for a service truck maturing September 9, 2024. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 7.99% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2020. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(s)On November 5, 2018, Capstone Equipment Leasing entered into four long-term secured notes payable for $140 maturing on November 5, 2021. The notes are secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at rates ranging between 6.89% and 7.87% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2020. These notes were assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(t)On November 7, 2018, Capstone Equipment Leasing entered into a long-term secured note payable for $301 maturing on November 22, 2023. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 10.25% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2020. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(u)Note payable assumed in the Banner Midstream acquisition at 5% interest. Was used in the purchase of a workover rig for Shamrock. This amount which includes $5 of accrued interest of which that was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream was repaid in June 2020.

F-21

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

The following is a list of maturities (net of discount) as of March 31:

2021 $6,401 
2022  182 
2023  126 
2024  93 
2025  20 
  $6,822 

NOTE 10: NOTES PAYABLE - RELATED PARTIES

Notes payable to related parties consisted of the following as of March 31:

  2020  2019 
Ecoark Holdings Board Member (a) $578  $        - 
Ecoark Holdings Officers (b)  1,242   - 
Banner Midstream Officers (c)  152   - 
Ecoark Holdings – common ownership (d)  200   - 
Total Notes Payable – Related Parties  2,172   - 
Less: Current Portion of Notes Payable – Related Parties  (2,172)  (-)
Long-term debt, net of current portion $-  $- 

(a)A board member advanced $328 to the Company through March 31, 2020, under the terms of a note payable that bears 10% simple interest per annum, and the principal balance along with accrued interest is payable July 30, 2020 or upon demand. Interest expense on the note for the year ended March 31, 2020 was $27. In addition, the Company assumed $250 in notes entered into in March 2020 via the acquisition of Banner Midstream from the same board member at 15% interest.

(b)William B. Hoagland, Principal Financial Officer, advanced $30 to the Company in May 2019 pursuant to a note with the same terms as the note with the board member. Randy May, CEO, advanced $45 to the Company in August 2019 pursuant to a note with the same terms as the note with the board member. Interest expense on both of these notes was $5. Both of these amounts along with the accrued interest was repaid during the year ended March 31, 2020. In addition, Randy May advanced $1,242 in five separate notes to Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition by the Company. These amounts are due at various times through July 2020 and bear interest at 10-15% interest per annum. Accrued interest on these notes as of March 31, 2020 is $186. $968 of these notes were repaid in May 2020.

(c)An officer of Banner Midstream who remains an officer of this subsidiary advanced $152 in three separate notes to Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition by the Company. These amounts are due at various times through July 2020 and bear interest at 10-15% interest per annum. Accrued interest on these notes as of March 31, 2020 is $17. $55 of these notes were repaid in May 2020.

(d)A company controlled by an officer of the Company advanced $200 to Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition by the Company. These amounts were due April 15, 2020 and bears interest at 14% interest per annum. Accrued interest on this note as of March 31, 2020 is $8. These notes were converted in May 2020.

NOTE 11: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Ecoark Holdings Preferred Stock

On March 18, 2016, the Company created 5,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001. On August 21, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), the Company and two accredited investors entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the investors an aggregate of 2 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share at a price of $1,000 per share.

F-22

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to each investor a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock purchased by the investor. Each Warrant has an exercise price equal to $0.51, subject to full ratchet price only anti-dilution provisions in accordance with the terms of the Warrants (the “Exercise Price”) and is exercisable for five years after the Effective Date. In addition, if the market price of the Common Stock on the 11 month anniversary of the closing date of the offering is less than $0.51, holder of the warrants shall be entitled to receive additional shares of common stock based on the number of shares of common stock that would have been issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock had the initial conversion price been equal to the market price at such time (but not less than $0.25) less the number of shares of common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock based on the $0.51 conversion price.

The Company also agreed to amend the current exercise price of the warrants that the investors received in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreements dated March 14, 2017 (the “March Warrants”) and May 22, 2017 (the “May Warrants” and, together with the March Warrants, the “Existing Securities”). The Existing Securities have a current exercise price of $0.59, which was amended from $2.50 on July 12, 2019. The current exercise price for the Existing Securities shall be amended to reduce the exercise price to $0.51 on August 21, 2019, subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of the Existing Securities.

Each share of the Series B Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $1,000 (the “Stated Value”) and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $0.51, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

The Company received gross proceeds from the Private Placement of $2,000, before deducting transaction costs, fees and expenses payable by the Company. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Private Placement to support the Company’s general working capital requirements.

As required by the Securities Purchase Agreement, each director and officer of the Company has previously entered into a lock-up agreement with the Company whereby each director and officer has agreed that during the period commencing from the Effective Date until 120 days after the Effective Date, such director or officer will not offer, sell, contract to sell, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise dispose of or enter into any transaction to dispose of, or establish or increase a put position or liquidate or decrease a call position, with respect to any share of Common Stock or securities convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into, shares of Common Stock. On August 21, 2019, the Company issued 300 shares of common stock to advisors that assisted with the securities purchase agreement and exchange agreement.

On October 15, 2019, nearly all the Series B Preferred Stock shares were converted into 3,761 shares of Common Stock.

On November 11, 2019, the Company and two accredited investors entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the investors an aggregate of 1 share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), at a price of $1,000 per share (the “Private Placement”).

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to each investor a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock purchased by the Investor. Each Warrant has an exercise price equal to $0.73, subject to full ratchet price only anti-dilution provisions in accordance with the terms of the Warrants (the “Exercise Price”) and is exercisable for five years after the Effective Date. In addition, if the market price of the Common Stock for the five trading days prior to July 22, 2020 is less than $0.73, holder of the warrants shall be entitled to receive additional shares of common stock based on the number of shares of common stock that would have been issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock had the initial conversion price been equal to the market price at such time (but not less than $0.25) less the number of shares of common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock based on the $0.73 conversion price.

Each share of the Series C Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $1,000 (the “Stated Value”) and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $0.73, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

The Company received gross proceeds from the Private Placement of $1,000. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Private Placement to support the Company’s general working capital requirements.

F-23

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

As required by the Securities Purchase Agreement, each director and officer of the Company has previously entered into a lock-up agreement with the Company whereby each director and officer has agreed that during the period commencing from the Effective Date until 120 days after the Effective Date, such director or officer will not offer, sell, contract to sell, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise dispose of or enter into any transaction to dispose of, or establish or increase a put position or liquidate or decrease a call position, with respect to any share of Common Stock or securities convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into, shares of Common Stock.

Ecoark Holdings Common Stock

The Company has 100,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 which were authorized on March 18, 2016. On March 31, 2020 this amount was increased to 200,000, par value $0.001.

On May 31, 2019, the Company acquired Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc. for 5,500 shares of common stock. The value of this transaction was $3,237.

On July 12, 2019, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with investors that are the holders of March and August 2018 warrants. As a result of a cashless exercise, the Company issued 4,277 shares of the Company’s common stock to the investors. Upon the issuance of the 4,277 shares, the March and August 2018 warrants for 5,677 shares were extinguished. The fair value of the shares issued was $3,293, and the fair value of the warrants was $2,455 resulting in a loss of $839 that was recognized on the exchange. On August 21, 2019, the Company issued 300 shares to advisors that assisted with the securities purchase agreement and exchange agreement.

On October 15, 2019, nearly all the Series B Preferred Stock shares were converted into 3,761 shares of Common Stock. On October 28, 2019, the Company issued 2,243 shares of the Company’s common stock to investors in exchange for the March and May 2017 warrants. Upon the issuance of the 2,243 shares, the March and May 2017 warrants were extinguished. The fair value of the shares issued was $2,186, and the fair value of the warrants was $1,966 resulting in a loss of $220 that was recognized on the exchange. On October 31, 2019, the Company issued 120 shares of common stock for services rendered. On December 20, 2019, the Company issued 128 shares of common stock for services rendered. A loss of $100 was recognized related to the issuance of the 248 shares. On December 24, 2019, the Company issued 247 shares of common stock for services to be rendered in 2020.

On February 21, 2020, the Company issued 8 shares of common stock for services valued at $7.

On January 27, 2020, the Company exercised the 3,922 warrants which were granted in August 2019 into common shares.

On March 27, 2020, the Company and Banner Energy, a Nevada corporation (“Banner Parent”), entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Banner Purchase Agreement”) to acquire Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”). Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner Midstream will became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and Banner Parent received shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Banner Midstream.

The Company issued 8,945 shares of common stock (which Banner Parent issued to certain of its noteholders) and assumed $11,771 in debt of Banner Midstream. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and another director recused themselves from all board discussions on the acquisition of Banner Midstream as they are stockholders and/or noteholders of Banner Midstream. The transaction was approved by all of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Chairman and CEO of Banner Parent is a former officer of the Company and has maintained a relationship with the Company as a consultant.

On March 31, 2020, the Company converted all principal and interest in the Trend Discovery SPV I, LLC credit facility into shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion of approximately $2,525 of principal and $290 of accrued interest resulted in the issuance of 3,855 shares of common stock at a value of $0.59 per share. As a result of the conversion, there are no amounts outstanding as of March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2020, 85,876 total shares were issued and 85,291 shares were outstanding, net of 585 treasury shares.

F-24

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

Changes in the warrants are described in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  9,206  $2.12   10,577  $4.37 
Granted  13,426  $0.72   3,177  $2.00 
Exercised  (11,633) $(1.25)  -     
Cancelled  (2,877) $(5.16)  -     
Expired  (-) $-   (4,547) $5.17 
Ending balance  8,122  $1.12   9,206  $2.12 
Intrinsic value of warrants $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  4.6       3.0     

The originally granted March 2017 (1,000 at an exercise price of $5.50) and May 2017 (1,875 at an exercise price of $5.00) warrants were replaced with October 2019 (2,243) warrants with a new exercise price of $0.59. The March 2017 and May 2017 are reflected as cancelled and the October 2019 are included in warrants granted.

Share-based Compensation Expense

Share-based compensation for employees is included in salaries and salary related costs and directors and services are included in professional fees and consulting in the consolidated statement of operations as follows for the years ended March 31:

  2013
Incentive
Stock Plan
  2017
Omnibus
Incentive
Plan
  Non-
Qualified
Stock
Options
  Common
Stock
  Warrants  Total 
2020                        
Directors $   -  $200  $334  $-  $       -  $534 
Employees  -   568   1,556   -   -   2,124 
Services  -   245   196   717   -   1,158 
  $-  $1,013  $2,086  $717  $-  $3,816 
                         
2019                        
Directors $-  $400  $-  $-  $-  $400 
Employees  270   356   2,066   -   -   2,692 
Services  -   (14)  -   -   -   (14)
Services prepaid expense  -   -   -   -   -   - 
  $270  $742  $2,066  $-  $-  $3,078 

Modification of Awards

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company issued option awards to individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. In addition, the Committee approved 2,909 new option awards that vest over a four-year period to induce certain employees to accept the replacement options, to compensate them for diminution in value of their existing awards and in consideration of a number of other factors, including each individual’s role and responsibility with the Company, their years of service to the Company, and market precedents and standards for modification of equity awards. With respect to the replacement options, grantees agreed to exchange the existing awards covering 2,718 shares of the Company’s common stock and were granted replacement options to purchase 2,926 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants. In consideration of the agreements, the majority of replacement options vested immediately upon grant. The new option awards vest in twelve equal installments, with the first installment vesting on January 15, 2018, and additional installments vesting on the last day of each of the eleven successive three-month periods, subject to continued employment by the Company. The replacement options were issued under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan or 2013 Incentive Stock Plan to correspond with the plan under which the existing awards were issued. The new options were not granted under any of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans.

F-25

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

In accordance with ASU 2017-09Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting, the Company recognized the total compensation cost measured at the date of a modification which is the sum of the portion of the grant-date fair value of the original award for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered (or has already been rendered) at that date and the incremental cost resulting from the modification. The replacement and new options had a fair value of $10,290, of which $4,507 (including $3,286 of fair value adjustments to the new instruments) was recognized as share-based compensation in the three months ended December 31, 2017 and the remaining $5,783 will be recognized in periods through December 2021.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015,2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company had one major customer comprising 62%issued option awards to individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and 65%restricted stock unit awards previously granted. With respect to the replacement options, grantees agreed to exchange the existing awards covering 300 shares of revenue. A major customer is defined as a customer that represents 10% or greaterthe Company’s common stock and were granted replacement options to purchase 300 shares of total sales. Additionally,the Company’s common stock at an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants. The replacement options vest according to the original vesting schedule of the awards exchanged. The replacement options were issued under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan to correspond with the plan under which the existing awards were issued.

In accordance with ASU 2017-09Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting, the Company recognized the total compensation cost measured at the date of a modification which is the sum of the portion of the grant-date fair value of the original award for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered (or has already been rendered) at that date and the incremental cost resulting from the modification. The replacement options had two customersa fair value of $467, which was less than the fair value of the existing awards exchanged and therefore an incremental share-based compensation cost was not recognized and the $467 will be recognized in periods through December 2018.

On June 6, 2020 the Board Compensation Committee approved the modification of an executive’s stock option as allowable by the Company’s 2013 Incentive Stock Option Plan and 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan to amend the strike price of the executive’s 3,362,500 stock option grant from $2.60 per share to $0.73 per share.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

As previously described, new option awards were granted to induce individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. The individuals were granted options to purchase 2,909 shares of Company common stock that vest at a rate of 25% per year from 2018 to 2021, subject to continued employment by the Company. As with the replacement options, the new options have an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grant. Share-based compensation costs of $1,684 for grants not yet recognized will be recognized as expense through 2021, subject to any change for actual versus estimated forfeitures. The new options were not granted under any of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans, however they have terms consistent with terms of the plans.

The Company records share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 for employees and ASC 505 for non-employees. Management valued the options utilizing the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria: stock price - $2.60; exercise price - $2.60; expected term – 4 years; discount rate – 2.03%; and volatility – 97%.

In 2019, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former consultant which provided for the issuance of options for 7 shares of common stock in addition to other terms. The options entitle the holders to purchase shares of common stock for $0.98 per share through November 2023. Management valued the options utilizing the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria: stock price - $0.98; exercise price - $0.98; expected term – 4 years; discount rate – 2.51%; and volatility – 148%.

In 2020, the Company granted 5,560 options to consultants, board members and employees for the non-qualified stock options as well as the options granted under the 2017 Omnibus plan below, that vest over time in service-based grants. The options were valued under the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria: stock price range of - $0.50 - $1.35; range of exercise price - $0.50 - $1.35; expected term – 4 years; discount rate – 1.12%; and volatility – average of 84%.

F-26

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

Changes in the non-qualified stock options are described in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  2,916  $2.60   2,909  $2.60 
Granted  5,560  $0.57   7  $0.98 
Exercised  -       -     
Cancelled  (254) $(2.60)  -     
Forfeited  -       -     
Ending balance  8,222  $1.22   2,916  $2.60 
Intrinsic value of options $372             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  8.7       8.5     

2013 Incentive Stock Plan

The 2013 Incentive Stock Plan was registered on February 7, 2013. Under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan, the Company may grant incentive stock in the form of stock options, stock awards and stock purchase offers of up to 5,500 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant. At the time of the Merger, 5,497 shares were available to issue under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan.

As previously described, during the three months ended March 31, 2018, new option awards were granted to individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. With respect to the replacement options, grantees agreed to exchange the existing awards covering 300 shares of the Company’s common stock and were granted 300 replacement options to purchase shares of Company common stock at an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants. The replacement options vest according to the original vesting schedule of the awards exchanged through December 2018. The replacement options were issued under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan to correspond with the plan under which the existing awards were issued.

Share-based compensation costs have been fully recognized as expense through December 31, 2018.

The Company records share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 for employees and ASC 505 for non-employees. Management valued the options utilizing the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria ranges: stock price - $2.10 to $2.60 exercise price - $2.10 to $2.60; expected term – 4.0 to 5.2 years; discount rate – 2.22% to 2.7%; and volatility – 95 to 105%. Changes in the options under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan are described in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  2,353  $2.52   2,563  $2.52 
Granted  -       -     
Options granted in exchange for shares  -       -     
Exercised  -       -     
Expired/Cancelled  (495)      -     
Forfeited  (125)      (210)    
Ending balance  1,733  $2.52   2,353  $2.52 
Intrinsic value of options $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  7.6       8.6     

F-27

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

A summary of the activity for service-based grants as of March 31, 20162020 and December2019 is presented below for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance         -  $           -   105  $4.90 
Granted  -             
Issued  -       (96)    
Expired  -       -     
Forfeited  -       (9)    
Options granted in exchange for shares  -       -     
Ending balance  -  $-   -  $- 
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  -       -     

A reconciliation of the shares available and issued under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan is presented in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
Beginning available  454   235 
Shares modified to options  -   - 
Options in exchange for shares  -   - 
Shares forfeited  -   219 
Ending available  454   454 
         
Vested stock awards (1)  4,414   2,353 
         
Beginning number of shares issued  2,681   2,585 
Issued  -   96 
Cancelled  -   - 
Ending number of shares issued  2,681   2,681 

(1)For 2020, Includes 2,681 of vested RSU’s and 1,773 of vested stock options

2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan

The 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan was registered on June 14, 2017. Under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company may grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, and other awards. Awards of up to 4,000 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are available under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant.

As previously described, new option awards were granted to individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. With respect to the replacement options, grantees agreed to exchange the existing awards covering 525 shares of the Company’s common stock and were granted 663 replacement options to purchase shares of Company common stock at an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants. In consideration of the agreements, the majority of the replacement options vested immediately upon grant. The remaining replacement options will vest in equal installments through July 2020, subject to continued employment by the Company.

Share-based compensation costs of approximately $629 for grants not yet recognized will be recognized as expense through October 2023 subject to any changes for actual versus estimated forfeitures.

F-28

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20152020

  2020  2019 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  1,870  $1.54   1,374  $2.76 
Granted  879  $1.21   1,034  $0.93 
Shares modified to options  -   -   -   - 
Exercised  -       -     
Cancelled  (78)      -     
Forfeited  -       (538)    
Ending balance  2,671  $1.54   1,870  $1.54 
Intrinsic value of options $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  9.2       9.2     

A summary of the activity for service-based RSUs as of March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 is presented below for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance          -  $         -   50  $2.60 
Granted ��-       -   - 
Issued  -       (25)    
Expired  -       -     
Forfeited  -       (25)    
Options granted in exchange  -             
Ending balance  -  $-   -  $- 
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  -       -     

Additional information regarding the RSUs is presented in the table below as of and for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
Total market value of shares/units vested $     -  $- 
Share-based compensation expense for RSUs $-  $(254)
Total tax benefit related to RSU share-based compensation expense $-  $- 
Cash tax benefits realized for tax deductions for RSUs $-  $- 

At March 31, 2019, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs with accounts receivable balancesa weighted average vesting period of 46% and 32%0 years.

F-29

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

A reconciliation of the total shares available and issued under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan is presented in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
Beginning available  1,615   2,111 
Shares granted  (604)  (1,034)
Shares modified to options  -   - 
Options in exchange for shares  (-)  (-)
Shares expired  -   - 
Shares forfeited  215   538 
Ending available  1,226   1,615 
         
Vested stock awards (1)  2,451   905 
         
Beginning number of shares issued  490   465 
Issued  -   25 
Cancelled  -   - 
Ending number of shares issued  490   490 

(1)For 2020, Includes 490 of vested RSU’s and 1,961 of vested stock options

NOTE 12: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

We are presently involved in the following in Arkansas and Florida. To the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of our properties or businesses are subject, which would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

On August 1, 2018, Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Zest Labs, Inc. filed a complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. Ecoark Holdings and Zest Labs are seeking monetary damages and other related relief to the extent it is deemed proper by the court. The Company does not believe that expenses incurred in pursuing the complaint have had a material effect on the Company’s net income or financial condition for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 or any individual fiscal quarter. On October 22, 2018, the Court issued an order initially setting a trial date of June 1, 2020, which has been delayed due to COVID-19.

On December 12, 2018, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in Sarasota County, Florida by certain investors who invested in the Company before it was public. The complaint alleges that the investment advisors who solicited the investors to invest into the Company made omissions and misrepresentations concerning the Company and the shares. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint which is pending.

In the opinion of management, there are no legal matters involving us that would have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Royalties

The Company has cross-licensing agreements with several technology companies that require payment of royalties upon the sale and or use of certain patented technologies. One of these agreements requires minimum annual payments of $50 until the last of the patents expire.

NOTE 13: INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts receivable.for income taxes under ASC Topic 740: Income Taxes which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for both the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax losses and tax credit carryforwards. ASC Topic 740 additionally requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets. The Company has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes totaling approximately $109,794 at March 31, 2020. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 places a limitation on the amount of taxable income that can be offset by carryforwards after certain ownership shifts. The Company is in process of determining all potential limitations with respect to Section 382 and will adjust in future periods. There is a full valuation allowance on these net operating loss carryforwards, so there will be no impact on the financial position of the Company.

F-30

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

The table below summarizes the differences between the tax benefit computed at the statutory federal tax rate and the Company’s net income tax benefit for the years ended March 31:

  2020  2019 
Tax benefit computed at expected statutory rate $(2,549) $(2,867)
State income taxes  (288)  2 
Permanent differences:        
Intangibles purchased  (2,185)  - 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  77   (664)
Gain/Loss on conversion of liabilities  364   - 
Temporary differences:        
Share-based compensation  892   728 
Property and equipment  (94)  (48)
Intangible assets  -   640 
Other adjustments  657   42 
Increase in valuation allowance  3,280   2,169 
Net income tax benefit $-  $- 

The Company has deferred tax assets (liabilities) which are summarized as follows at March 31:

  2020  2019 
Net operating loss carryover $25,659  $23,327 
Depreciable and amortizable assets  1,866   1,761 
Share-based compensation  4,548   3,586 
Accrued liabilities  42   57 
Allowance for bad debts  135   120 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (802)  (2,884)
Intangible assets purchased  (2,185)  - 
Other  365   381 
Less: valuation allowance  (29,628)  (26,348)
Net deferred tax asset $-  $- 

After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has recorded a full valuation allowance at March 31, 2020, due to the uncertainty of realizing the deferred income tax assets. The valuation was increased by approximately $3,280 as a result of differences relating to fiscal 2020 operations offset by the non-deductibility of the intangibles acquired in the Banner Midstream acquisition. The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions and has not received any notices from tax authorities.

NOTE 14: CONCENTRATIONS

Concentration of Credit Risk.The Company’s customer base for its Zest Lab products is concentrated with a small number of customers. The Company does not believe thatgenerally require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. To reduce credit risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations on its customers’ financial condition. The Company establishes allowances for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk associated withof customers, historical trends and other information. Two customers, both in the commodity segment accounted for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance at March 31, 2020 for a total of 63% of accounts receivable), and represented approximately 32% of total revenues for the Company for the year ended March 31, 2020 (both over 10% individually). J. Terrence Thompson accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable as of March 31, 2019.

F-31

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

Supplier Concentration. Certain of the raw materials, components and equipment used by the Company in the manufacture of its products are available from single-sourced vendors. Shortages could occur in these customers willessential materials and components due to an interruption of supply or increased demand in the industry. If the Company were unable to procure certain materials, components or equipment at acceptable prices, it would be required to reduce its manufacturing operations, which could have ana material adverse effect on its results of operations. In addition, the business.Company may make prepayments to certain suppliers or enter into minimum volume commitment agreements. Should these suppliers be unable to deliver on their obligations or experience financial difficulty, the Company may not be able to recover these prepayments.

 

The Company maintainedoccasionally maintains cash balances in excess of the FDIC insured limit in both years.limit. The Company does not consider this risk to be material.

 

nOTE 12: SUBSEQUENT EVENTSNOTE 15: ACQUISITIONS

 

The settlement referred to in Note 9 was paid in April 2016.

On April 28, 2016, the Company issued 625 shares of common stock to legal and other consultants who advised the Company on the Merger.

The private placement offering described in Note 2 was closed on April28, 2016. The offering raised $17,347 in capital. The company issued an additional 1,949 shares of its common stock and an additional 1,949 warrants on April 28, 2016. These warrants have a strike price of $5.00 per share and expire on December 31, 2018.Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc.

 

On May 3, 2016,31, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) by and amongfor the Company Pioneer Products, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company (“Sable”to acquire 100% of Trend Holdings pursuant to a merger of Trend Holdings with and into the Company (the “Merger”),. The Merger was completed as agreed in the Merger Agreement, the Company is the surviving entity in the Merger and the holderseparate corporate existence of allTrend Holdings has ceased to exist. Pursuant to the Merger, each of Sable’s membership interests.

The Companythe 1,000 issued 2,000and outstanding shares of common stock of Trend Holdings was converted into 5,500 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) in exchange for all of Sable’s membership interests. Sable will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products.

The seller shall be subject to a lock-up agreement (the “Lock-Up Agreement”) that releases shares from the Lock-Up Agreement over a period of one year (the “Lock-Up Period”). Under the Lock-Up Agreement, the seller shall be permitted to sell 33.3% of the Shares received by the seller after the six-month anniversary of the closing of the transaction. Thereafter, an additional 33.3% of the Shares shall be released at the end of each subsequent three-month period until the end of the Lock-Up Period.

stock. No cash was paid relating to the acquisition of Sable. Sable operates a polymer manufacturing facility north of Atlanta, Georgia.acquisition.

 

The Company acquired the assets and liabilities noted below in exchange for the 2,0005,500 shares and is accountingaccounted for the acquisition in accordance with ASC 805. Based on the fair values at the effective date of acquisition the purchase price was recorded as follows:

 

Cash $3 
Receivables  10 
Other assets  2 
Goodwill  3,222 
  $3,237 

Cash $81 
Receivables, net  1,275 
Inventory  909 
Property and equipment, net  2,822 
Intangible assets  1,028 
Goodwill  1,238 
Other assets  36 
Accounts payable and other liabilities  (981)
Notes payable and current debt  (2,251)
Long-term debt  (280)
  $3,877 

The Acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total acquisition consideration price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their preliminary estimated fair values. The fair value measurements utilize estimates based on key assumptions of the Acquisition, and historical and current market data. The excess of the purchase price over the total of estimated fair values assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. In order to ultimately determine the fair values of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Trend Holdings, we have engaged a third-party independent valuation specialist. The Company has recognized the purchase price allocations based on historical inputs and data as of May 31, 2019. The allocation of the purchase price is based on the best information available, amongst other things: (i) the valuation of the fair values and useful lives of tangible assets acquired; (ii) valuations and useful lives for intangible assets; (iii) valuation of accounts payable and accrued expenses; and (iv) the fair value of non-cash consideration.

 

The Company had an independent valuation consultant confirm the valuation of Trend Holdings and the allocation of the intangible assets.

The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

F-32

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2020

Banner Midstream

On March 27, 2020, the Company and Banner Energy, a Nevada corporation (“Banner Parent”), entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Banner Purchase Agreement”) to acquire Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”). Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and Banner Parent received shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Banner Midstream.

Banner Midstream has four operating subsidiaries: Pinnacle Frac Transport LLC (“Pinnacle Frac”), Capstone Equipment Leasing LLC (“Capstone”), White River Holdings Corp. (“White River”), and Shamrock Upstream Energy LLC (“Shamrock”). Pinnacle Frac provides transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations. Capstone procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors. These two operating subsidiaries of Banner Midstream are revenue producing entities. White River and Shamrock are engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, and drilling operations on over 10,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

The Company issued 8,945 shares of common stock (which Banner Parent issued to certain of its noteholders) and assumed $11,774 in debt and lease liabilities of Banner Midstream. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and another director recused themselves from all board discussions on the acquisition of Banner Midstream as they are stockholders and/or noteholders of Banner Midstream. The transaction was approved by all of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Chairman and CEO of Banner Parent is a former officer of the Company and is currently the Principal Accounting Officer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer and President of Banner Midstream.

The Company acquired the assets and liabilities noted below in exchange for the 8,945 shares and accounted for the acquisition in accordance with ASC 805. Based on the fair values at the effective date of acquisition the purchase price was recorded as follows (subject to adjustment):

Cash (including restricted cash) $205 
Accounts receivables  110 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  585 
Machinery and equipment  3,426 
Oil and gas properties  6,135 
Customer relationships  2,100 
Trade name  250 
Right of use assets  731 
Assets of discontinued operations  249 
Goodwill  8,364 
Accounts payable  (268)
Accrued liabilities  (2,362)
Due to prior owners  (2,362)
Lease liabilities  (732)
Liabilities of discontinued operations  (228)
Asset retirement obligation  (295)
Notes payable – related parties  (1,844)
Long-term debt  (6,836)
  $4,866 

The consideration paid for Banner Midstream was in the form of 8,945 shares of stock at a fair value of $0.544 per share or $4,867. The Company had an independent valuation consultant perform a valuation of Banner Midstream.

The Acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total acquisition consideration price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their preliminary estimated fair values. The fair value measurements utilize estimates based on key assumptions of the Acquisition, and historical and current market data. The excess of the purchase price over the total of the estimated fair values assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets represent customer listsacquired and willliabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. In order to determine the fair values of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Banner Midstream, we have engaged a third-party independent valuation specialist. The Company has estimated the preliminary purchase price allocations based on historical inputs and data as of March 27, 2020. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price is based on the best information available and is pending, amongst other things: (i) the finalization of the valuation of the fair values and useful lives of tangible assets acquired; (ii) the finalization of the valuations and useful lives for the reserves and intangible assets acquired; (iii) finalization of the valuation of accounts payable and accrued expenses; and (iv) finalization of the fair value of non-cash consideration.

During the measurement period (which is the period required to obtain all necessary information that existed at the acquisition date, or to conclude that such information is unavailable, not to exceed one year), additional assets or liabilities may be amortized over three years. recognized, or there could be changes to the amounts of assets or liabilities previously recognized on a preliminary basis, if new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have resulted in the recognition of these assets or liabilities as of that date.

F-33

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2020

The goodwill willis not expected to be amortized but will be tested annuallydeductible for impairment.tax purposes.

 

The following table shows the unaudited pro-forma results for the three monthsyears ended March 31, 20162020 and 20152019, as if the acquisition had occurred on JanuaryApril 1, 2015.2018. These unaudited pro forma results of operations are based on the historical financial statements and related notes of SableTrend Holdings, Banner Midstream (which includes White River and Shamrock) and the Company.

 Years Ended 
 March 31, 
 2020  2019 
 For the three months ended
March 31,
  (Unaudited) (Unaudited) 
 2016 2015      
Revenues $3,200  $4,412  $16,297  $10,101 
Net loss attributable to controlling interest $2,529  $3,104 
Net loss $(17,618) $(17,351)
Net loss per share $(0.08) $(0.13) $(0.28) $(0.34)

 

F-63

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMNOTE 16: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

To the Member of

Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC

Rogers, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related statements of operations, changes in member’s equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an auditmeasures and discloses the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates madefair value hierarchy prescribed by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its statements of operations, changes in member’s equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Companyfair value hierarchy has sustained operating losses and needs to obtain additional financing to continue the development of their product. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ KBL, LLP

New York, NY

June 10, 2016

F-64

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2015 and 2014

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 
ASSETS      
       
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $31  $80 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance  1,025   977 
Accounts receivable – related parties  -   32 
Inventory, net of reserves  1,238   1,040 
Prepaid expenses  40   - 
Other current assets  25   - 
Total current assets  2,359   2,129 
         
Property and equipment, net  1,391   1,358 
Total non-current assets  1,391   1,358 
TOTAL ASSETS $3,750  $3,487 
         
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Current portion of long-term debt $175  $166 
Note payable  1,500   500 
Advances - related parties  -   1,929 
Accounts payable  470   721 
Accounts payable – related parties  63   - 
Accrued expenses  126   4 
Accrued interest  6   5 
Total current liabilities  2,340   3,325 
         
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Commitments and contingencies  -   - 
Long-term debt  327   503 
Total non-current liabilities  327   503 
         
Total liabilities  2,667   3,828 
         
MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Member’s equity (deficit)  1,083   (341)
Total member’s equity (deficit)  1,083   (341)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT) $3,750  $3,487 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-65

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2015  2014 
       
REVENUES $14,047  $10,821 
COST OF REVENUES  14,635   11,020 
GROSS (LOSS)  (588)  (199)
         
OPERATING EXPENSES:        
General and administrative  305   298 
Depreciation and amortization  266   213 
Total operating expenses  571   511 
Loss from operations  (1,159)  (710)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):        
Other income, net of other expenses  74   - 
Loss on abandonment of leasehold improvements  (43)  - 
Interest expense  (77)  (65)
Total other income (expense)  (46)  (65)
         
NET LOSS $(1,205) $(775)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-66

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

  (Dollars in
thousands)
 
  Total 
    
Balance at January 1, 2014 $434 
     
Net loss for the year  (775)
     
Balance at December 31, 2014  (341)
     
Conversion of related party note payable to equity  2,629 
     
Net loss for the year  (1,205)
     
Balance at December 31, 2015 $1,083 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-67

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

STATEMENTs OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2015  2014 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss $(1,205) $(775)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  266   213 
Loss on abandonment of leasehold improvements  43   - 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (48)  (275)
Accounts receivable – related parties  32   (32)
Inventory  (198)  (84)
Prepaid expenses  (40)  - 
Other current assets  (25)  - 
Accounts payable  (251)  119 
Accounts payable – related parties  59   - 
Accrued expenses  125   2 
Accrued interest  1   5 
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,241)  (827)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchases of property and equipment  (392)  (619)
Proceeds from sale of equipment  50   - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (342)  (619)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from borrowings  1,000   667 
Repayments of debt  (166)  - 
Proceeds from advances - related parties  700   753 
Net cash provided by financing activities  1,534   1,273 
NET (DECREASE) IN CASH  (49)  (173)
Cash - beginning of the year  80   253 
Cash - end of the year $31  $80 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:        
Cash paid for interest $76  $60 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 
         
SUMMARY OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:        
Advances from related parties contributed to capital $2,629  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-68

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

DECEMBER 31, 2015

NOTE1: ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business and Organization

Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC, an LLC formed in Arkansas on September 10, 2012 (“Sable” or the “Company”) has expertise in the recycling and reclamation of resin materials. It operates a plastics recycling plant in Flowery Branch, Georgia. Sable principally purchases plastic and resin materials and after conversions and reformulation sells those products. In addition to those product sales, the Company performs limited tolling services for other customers. The Company operated as a partnership until March 2013 when it became a single member LLC.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). It is Management's opinion, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been madethree levels, which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, Management’s estimate of provisions required for non-collectible accounts receivable, an amount per pound of material processed for labor and overhead, and adjustments for lower of cost or market, obsolete or slow-moving inventory, which are shown net. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash

Cash consists of cash and demand deposits.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventory cost is determined on a first in first out basis, and provisions are made to reduce slow-moving, obsolete, or unusable inventories to their estimated useful or scrap values.

Property and Equipment and Long-Lived Assets

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation on property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to ten years.

FASB Codification Topic 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”), requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The application of ASC 360 has not materially affected the Company’s reported earnings, financial condition or cash flows.

The Company did not consider it necessary to record any impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent events were evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company reports shipping and handling revenues and their associated costs in cost of revenue, respectively. Shipping revenues and costs for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were nominal and included in cost of revenues.

F-69

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

DECEMBER 31, 2015

Revenue Recognition

Revenue primarily consists of the sale of recycled plastics products and is presented net of discounts and returns. Revenue is recognized when the following criteria have been met:

Evidence of an arrangement exists.The Company considers a customer purchase order, service agreement, contract, or equivalent document to be evidence of an arrangement.

Delivery has occurred. The Company’s standard transfer terms are free on board (FOB) shipping point. Thus, delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer at the time of shipment.

The fee is fixed or determinable.The Company considers the fee to be fixed or determinable if the fee is not subject to refund or adjustment and payment terms are standard, which is generally 30-60 days.

Collection is deemed reasonably assured. Collection is deemed reasonably assured if it is expected that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as payments become due. If it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, then revenue is deferred and recognized upon cash collection.

Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company considers accounts receivable, net of allowance for returns and doubtful accounts, to be fully collectible. The allowance is based on management’s estimatereliable available inputs of the overall collectability of accounts receivable, considering historical losses and economic conditions. Based on these same factors, individual accounts are charged off against the allowance when management determines those individual accounts are uncollectible. Credit extended to customers is generally uncollateralized. Past-due status is based on contractual terms. Management has determined that the allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $23 and $0, respectively. Provision for doubtful accounts was $35 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Income Taxes

observable data. The Company is a limited liability company treated as a disregarded entity for federal and state income tax purposes with all income tax liabilities and/or benefits of the Company being passed through to the member. As such, no recognition of federal or state income taxes for the Company has been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. Any uncertain tax position taken by the member is not an uncertain position of the Company.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 825, "Financial Instruments,"hierarchy requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company's financial instruments:use of observable market data when available. The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and accounts payable to related parties, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments.

Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews recoverability of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairmentthree-level hierarchy is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fixed assets to be disposed of by sale will be carried at the lower of the then current carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

F-70

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

DECEMBER 31, 2015

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:defined as follows:

 

Level 1 inputs: Quoted– quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.markets;

 

Level 2 inputs: Quoted– quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derivedmodel derived valuations whosein which significant inputs are observable or whoseand significant value drivers are observable.observable in active markets; and

 

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable– fair value drivers.measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

Financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, notes payable, and amounts due to related parties. The fair value of cash is determined based on Level 1 inputs. There were no transfers into or out of “Level 3” during the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective relatively short maturity dates or durations.

 

Related Party Transactions

PartiesFair value estimates are considered tomade at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be related todetermined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the Company if the parties directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal stockholders of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal stockholders of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal where one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.estimates. The Company discloses all related party transactions. All transactions shall be recorded atrecords the fair value of the goods or services exchanged. Property purchased from a related party is recorded at the cost to the related party and any payment to or on behalf of the related partywarrant derivative liabilities disclosed in excessNote 9 in accordance with ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging. The fair values of the cost is reflected as compensation or distribution to related parties depending onderivatives were calculated using the transaction.

A related party receivable of $32 was outstanding at December 31, 2014 related to freight charges paid on behalfBlack-Scholes Model. The fair value of the related party. Related party payables of $63, net were outstanding at December 31, 2015 related to equipment purchases.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”.ASU 2016-02 changes the accounting for leased assets, principally by requiringderivative liabilities is revalued on each balance sheet recognition of assets under lease arrangements. It is effective for annual reporting periods,date with corresponding gains and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currentlylosses recorded in other income (expense) in the processconsolidated statement of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-17, “Business Combinations – Pushdown Accounting.” The provisions of ASU 2014-17 require management to determining whether and at what threshold an acquiree (acquired entity) can reflect the acquirer’s accounting and reporting basis (pushdown accounting) in its separate financial statements. Since neither unit of this business combination is in the development stage, nor had recognizable revenues during this period the application of push down accounting would not be of significant value to the readers of these consolidated financial statements. The Company has not elected to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of this event.

During August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern.” The provisions of ASU 2014-15 require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-71

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

DECEMBER 31, 2015

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, and most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 will be applied using one of two retrospective methods. The effective date will be the first quarter of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. The Company has not determined the potential effects on its financial statements.

There were other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Going Concern

The Company commenced operations in 2012, and has experienced typical start-up costs and losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $2,716 since inception. The accumulated deficit as well as recurring losses of $1,205 and $775 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the limited working capital surplus of $19 as of December 31, 2015, have resulted in the uncertainty of the Company to continue as a going concern.

These financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable period of time.

The Company was acquired by Ecoark Holdings, Inc. on May 3, 2016 (see Note 10 below). The Company’s ability to raise additional funds is unknown. Obtaining additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, ultimately, to profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of the uncertainties.

NOTE 2:INVENTORY

Inventory, net of reserves, consisted of the following as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

  2015  2014 
Raw Materials $702  $930 
Finished Goods  536   110 
Inventory $1,238  $1,040 

NOTE 3:PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

  2015  2014 
Furniture and fixtures $116  $116 
Computers and software costs  4   3 
Machinery and equipment  1,834   1,539 
Leasehold improvements  25   48 
Total property and equipment  1,979   1,706 
Accumulated depreciation, amortization  (588)  (348)
Property and equipment, net $1,391  $1,358 

Depreciation expense for 2015 and 2014 was $266 and $213, respectively. There was no impairment on these assets for this two-year period. There was a loss on the abandonment of leasehold improvements of $43 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company also sold $71 of equipment that had $21 of accumulated depreciation in 2015 for $50.

F-72

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

DECEMBER 31, 2015

NOTE 4: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND PAYABLE – RELATED PARTIES

The Company at times conducts business with related parties controlled by the sole member. At December 31, 2014 amounts receivable from related parties for these transactions was $32. At December 31, 2015 amounts owed to related parties was $63.

NOTE 5: NOTES PAYABLE

The Company has a note payable pursuant to a line of credit maintained with Generations Bank. The notes are secured by the accounts receivable, inventory and equipment of the Company, with monthly interest only at 5.5%, and a balloon payment at maturity. The note at December 31, 2015 originated July 15, 2015 with a maximum amount of $1,500 and is due in one year. The note at December 31, 2014 originated July 15, 2014 with a maximum amount of $500 and was due on July 15, 2015. The balance of the notes was $1,500 and $500 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Average amounts outstanding under the line of credit were $818 and $428 for 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Interest expense on the notes for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $44 and $24, respectively.

NOTE 6: ADVANCES – RELATED PARTIES

The advances – related parties represent non-interest bearing, unsecured, advances from the principal of the Company for working capital needs. The advances – related party had a balance outstanding at December 31, 2014 of $1,900 and there were $700 additional advances in 2015. On June 30, 2015, the principal of the Company converted $2,000 of the advances to a capital contribution in the Company. On December 31, 2015 the principal of the Company converted the remaining outstanding balance of $629 to a capital contribution in the Company.

NOTE 7: LONG-TERM DEBT

 

The following is a summary of long-term debt as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

    2015  2014 
Note payable – Generations Bank (a) $258  $356 
Note payable – Generations Bank (b)  244   313 
Total    502   669 
Less: current portion    (175)  (166)
Long-term debt  $327  $503 

(a)Five year note payable dated May 3, 2013 in the original principal amount of $500 accruing interest at 5.5% with monthly payments of $10 and secured by the plant equipment of the Company and the guaranty of the principal of the Company.

(b)Five year note payable dated February 3, 2014 in the original principal amount of $367 accruing interest at 5.5% with monthly payments of $7 and secured by the plant equipment of the Company and the guaranty of the principal of the Company and an entity controlled by the principal of the Company.

Interest expense on the long-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $33 and $41, respectively. Principal payments required are as follows: 2016 - $175, 2017 - $185, 2018 - $128 and 2019 - $14.

F-73

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

DECEMBER 31, 2015

NOTE8: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases and Relocation

The Company leases its operating facilities under a long-term, non-cancelable operating lease agreement. In 2015 the Company relocated to a larger plant facility. The lease term for the new facility began on September 1, 2015 and expires on January 31, 2021. Four months of free rent were provided under the new lease, and rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Rent expense was $230 and $147 for 2015 and 2014, respectively. Future minimum lease payments required under the operating lease are as follows: 2016 - $300, 2017 - $300, 2018 -$300, 2019 - $300, 2020 - $300 and 2021 - $25.

When the Company moved from the previous facility $48 of leasehold improvements were written off resulting in a loss of $43. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $50 of direct costs and approximately $210 of labor costs associated with the move.

nOTE 9: CONCENTRATIONS

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had three and four major customers comprising 54% and 72% of sales, respectively. A major customer is defined as a customer that represents 10% or greater of total sales. Additionally, the Company had four and six customers as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 with accounts receivable balances of 57% and 99%, respectively, of the total accounts receivable.

In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had one and two major vendors comprising 10% and 21% of purchases, respectively. A major vendor is defined as a vendor that represents 10% or greater of total purchases. Additionally, the Company had two and one vendor as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 with accounts payable balances of 32% and 10%, respectively, of total accounts payable.

The Company does not believe that the risk associated with these customers and vendors will have an adverse effect on the business.

nOTE 10: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 3, 2016, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (“Ecoark”), Pioneer Products (an indirect subsidiary of Ecoark), and the holder of all of Sable’s membership interests.

Ecoark issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for all of Sable’s membership interests. Sable became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products.

No cash was paid relating to the acquisition of Sable. In April 2016, Ecoark advanced $600 to Sable for working capital purposes.

F-74

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2016 AND DECEMBER 31, 2015

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  March 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
ASSETS      
       
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $-  $31 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance  1,303   1,025 
Inventory, net of reserves  1,367   1,238 
Prepaid expenses  14   40 
Other current assets  25   25 
Total current assets  2,709   2,359 
         
Property and equipment, net  1,321   1,391 
Total non-current assets  1,321   1,391 
TOTAL ASSETS $4,030  $3,750 
         
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Current portion of long-term debt $178  $175 
Notes payable  1,500   1,500 
Cash overdraft  388   - 
Accounts payable  615   470 
Accounts payable – related parties  63   63 
Accrued expenses  135   126 
Accrued interest  6   6 
Total current liabilities  2,885   2,340 
         
         
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES          
Commitments and contingencies  -   - 
Long-term debt    282   327 
Total non-current liabilities  282   327 
         
Total liabilities  3,167   2,667 
         
MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Member’s equity (deficit)  863   1,083 
Total member’s equity (deficit)  863   1,083 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT) $4,030  $3,750 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

F-75

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 AND 2015

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2016  2015 
       
REVENUES $1,811  $2,892 
COST OF REVENUES  1,859   2,862 
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)  (48)  30 
         
OPERATING EXPENSES:        
General and administrative  75   37 
Depreciation and amortization  70   61 
Total operating expenses  145   98 
Loss from operations  (193)  (68)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):        
Interest expense  (27)  (17)
Total other income (expense)  (27)  (17)
         
NET LOSS $(220) $(85)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

F-76

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

STATEMENTs OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 AND 2015

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2016  2015 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss $(220) $(85)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  70   61 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (278)  (192)
Accounts receivable – related parties  -   22 
Inventory  (129)  (491)
Prepaid expenses  26   (9)
Accounts payable  145   463 
Accounts payable – related parties  -   (4)
Accrued expenses  9   39 
Accrued interest  -   1 
Net cash used in operating activities  (377)  (195)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchases of property and equipment  -   (19)
Net cash used in investing activities  -   (19)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Increase in cash overdraft  388   175 
Repayments of debt  (42)  (41)
Net cash provided by financing activities  346   134 
NET (DECREASE) IN CASH  (31)  (80)
Cash - beginning of period  31   80 
Cash - end of period $-  $- 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:        
Cash paid for interest $27  $16 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

F-77

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

MARCH 31, 2016

NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business and Organization

Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC, an LLC formed in Arkansas on September 10, 2012 (“Sable” or the “Company”) has expertise in the recycling and reclamation of resin materials. It operates a plastics recycling plant in Flowery Branch, Georgia. Sable principally purchases plastic and resin materials and after conversions and reformulation sells those products. In addition to those product sales, the Company performs limited tolling services for other customers. The Company operated as a partnership until March 2013 when it became a single member LLC.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. It is Management's opinion that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accounting policies and procedures employed in the preparation of these financial statements have been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, contained herein, was derived from those financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts oftable presents assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, butthat are not limited to, Management’s estimate of provisions required for non-collectible accounts receivable, an amount per pound of material processed for labor and overhead, and adjustments for lower of cost or market, obsolete or slow-moving inventory, which are shown net. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash

Cash consists of cash and demand deposits.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventory cost is determined on a first in first out basis, and provisions are made to reduce slow-moving, obsolete, or unusable inventories to their estimated useful or scrap values.

Property and Equipment and Long-Lived Assets

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation on property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to ten years.

FASB Codification Topic 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”), requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The application of ASC 360 has not materially affected the Company’s reported earnings, financial condition or cash flows.

The Company did not consider it necessary to record any impairment charges during the three months ended March 31, 2016, nor in the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent events were evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued.

F-78

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

MARCH 31, 2016

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company reports shipping and handling revenues and their associated costs in cost of revenue. Shipping revenues and costs for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were nominal and included in cost of revenues.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue primarily consists of the sale of recycled plastics products and is presented net of discounts and returns. Revenue is recognized when the following criteria have been met:

Evidence of an arrangement exists. The Company considers a customer purchase order, service agreement, contract, or equivalent document to be evidence of an arrangement.

Delivery has occurred. The Company’s standard transfer terms are free on board (FOB) shipping point. Thus, delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer at the time of shipment.

The fee is fixed or determinable.The Company considers the fee to be fixed or determinable if the fee is not subject to refund or adjustment and payment terms are standard, which is generally 30-60 days.

Collection is deemed reasonably assured. Collection is deemed reasonably assured if it is expected that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as payments become due. If it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, then revenue is deferredmeasured and recognized upon cash collection.

Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company considers accounts receivable, net of allowance for returns and doubtful accounts, to be fully collectible. The allowance is based on management’s estimate of the overall collectability of accounts receivable, considering historical losses and economic conditions. Based on these same factors, individual accounts are charged off against the allowance when management determines those individual accounts are uncollectible. Credit extended to customers is generally uncollateralized. Past-due status is based on contractual terms. Management has determined that the allowance for doubtful accounts at both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $23.

Income Taxes

The Company is a limited liability company treated as a disregarded entity for federal and state income tax purposes with all income tax liabilities and/or benefits of the Company being passed through to the member. As such, no recognition of federal or state income taxes for the Company has been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. Any uncertain tax position taken by the member is not an uncertain position of the Company.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 825, "Financial Instruments," requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company's financial instruments: The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and accounts payable to related parties, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments.

Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews recoverability of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fixed assets to be disposed of by sale will be carried at the lower of the then current carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

F-79

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

MARCH 31, 2016

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

Related Party Transactions

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal stockholders of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal stockholders of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal where one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all related party transactions. All transactions shall be recorded at fair value of the goods or services exchanged. Property purchased from a related party is recorded at the cost to the related party and any payment to or on behalf of the related party in excess of the cost is reflected as compensation or distribution to related parties depending on the transaction.

Related party payables related to equipment purchases of $63, net were outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”.ASU 2016-02 changes the accounting for leased assets, principally by requiring balance sheet recognition of assets under lease arrangements. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-17, “Business Combinations – Pushdown Accounting.” The provisions of ASU 2014-17 require management to determining whether and at what threshold an acquiree (acquired entity) can reflect the acquirer’s accounting and reporting basis (pushdown accounting) in its separate financial statements. Since neither unit of this business combination is in the development stage, nor had recognizable revenues during this period the application of push down accounting would not be of significant value to the readers of these consolidated financial statements.  The Company has not elected to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of this event.

During August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern.” The provisions of ASU 2014-15 require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-80

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

MARCH 31, 2016

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, and most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.  The amendments in ASU 2014-09 will be applied using one of two retrospective methods. The effective date will be the first quarter of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. The Company has not determined the potential effects on its financial statements.

There were other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Going Concern

The Company commenced operations in 2012, and has experienced typical start-up costs and losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $2,936 since inception. The accumulated deficit as well as recurring losses of $220 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and $1,205 and $775 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and a working capital deficit of $176 as of March 31, 2016, have resulted in the uncertainty of the Company to continue as a going concern.

These financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable period of time.

The Company was acquired by Ecoark Holdings, Inc. on May 3, 2016. The Company’s ability to raise additional funds is unknown. Obtaining additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, ultimately, to profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of the uncertainties.

NOTE 2:INVENTORY

Inventory, net of reserves, consisted of the following as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

  March 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
Raw materials $544  $702 
Finished goods  823   536 
Inventory $1,367  $1,238 

F-81

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

MARCH 31, 2016

NOTE 3:PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

  March 31, 2016  December 31,
2015
 
Furniture and fixtures $116  $116 
Computers and software costs  4   4 
Machinery and equipment  1,834   1,834 
Leasehold improvements  25   25 
Total property and equipment  1,979   1,979 
Accumulated depreciation, amortization  (658)  (588)
Property and equipment, net $1,321  $1,391 

Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $70 and $61, respectively. There was no impairment on these assets for the periods presented.

NOTE 4: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE – RELATED PARTIES

The Company at times conducts business with related parties controlled by the sole member. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 amounts owed to related parties were $63.

NOTE 5: NOTES PAYABLE

The Company has a note payable pursuant to a line of credit maintained with Generations Bank. The note is secured by the accounts receivable, inventory and equipment of the Company, with monthly interest only at 5.5%, and a balloon payment at maturity. The note at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 originated July 15, 2015 with a maximum amount of $1,500 and is due in one year. The balance of the notes was $1,500 and $1,500 at both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Average amounts outstanding under the line of credit were $1,500 and $500 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Interest expense on the notes for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $20 and $8, respectively.

NOTE 6: LONG-TERM DEBT

The following is a summary of long-term debt as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

     March  31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Note payable – Generations Bank  (a)  $234  $258 
Note payable – Generations Bank  (b)   226   244 
Total      460   502 
Less: current portion      (178)  (175)
Long-term debt     $282  $327 

(a)Five year note payable dated May 3, 2013 in the original principal amount of $500 accruing interest at 5.5% with monthly payments of $10 and secured by the plant equipment of the Company and the guaranty of the principal of the Company.

(b)Five year note payable dated February 3, 2014 in the original principal amount of $367 accruing interest at 5.5% with monthly payments of $7 and secured by the plant equipment of the Company and the guaranty of the principal of the Company and an entity controlled by the principal of the Company.

F-82

SABLE POLYMER SOLUTIONS, llc

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

MARCH 31, 2016

Interest expense on the long-term debt for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $7 and $9, respectively. Principal payments required in the two years following March 31, 2017 are $188 and $94.

NOTE 7: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The Company leases its operating facilities under a long-term, non-cancelable operating lease agreement. In 2015 the Company relocated to a larger plant facility. The lease term for the new facility began on September 1, 2015 and expires on January 31, 2021. Four months of free rent were provided under the new lease, and rent expense is recorded on a straight-linerecurring basis over the lease term. Rent expense was $70 and $37 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Future minimum lease payments required under the operating lease are as follows: 2016 - $225, 2017 - $300, 2018 -$300, 2019 - $300, 2020 - $300 and 2021 - $25.

nOTE 8: CONCENTRATIONS

During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had two and three major customers comprising 62% and 63% of sales, respectively. A major customer is defined as a customer that represents 10% or greater of total sales. Additionally, the Company had three customers as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 with accounts receivable balances of 57% and 68%, respectively, of the total accounts receivable.

In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had two major vendors comprising 27% and 21% of purchases, respectively. A major vendor is defined as a vendor that represents 10% or greater of total purchases. Additionally, the Company had one and two vendors as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 with accounts payable balances of 12% and 32%, respectively, of total accounts payable.

The Company does not believe that the risk associated with these customers and vendors will have an adverse effect on the business.

nOTE 9: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 3, 2016, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (“Ecoark”), Pioneer Products (an indirect subsidiary of Ecoark), and the holder of all of Sable’s membership interests.

Ecoark issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for all of Sable’s membership interests. Sable became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products.

No cash was paid relating to the acquisition of Sable. In April 2016, Ecoark advanced $600 to Sable for working capital purposes.

F-83

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC.

PRO FORMA UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars and number of shares in thousands)

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements (the “pro formas”) give effect to the acquisition on March 24, 2016 of the outstanding common shares of EcoArk Inc. and Subsidiaries, (“EcoArk”) by Magnolia Solar Corporation and a subsidiary (collectively “Magnolia”), with the surviving parent company now known as Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (“EARK”) The pro formas also give effect to the acquisition of Sable Polymer Solutions (“Sable”) by Ecoark Holdings, Inc. on May 3, 2016. The pro formas are based on estimates and assumptions set forth herein and in the notes to such pro forma statements.

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and for the year ended December 31, 2015 of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. give effect to the above as if the transactions had occurred at the beginning of the period. The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2016 assumes the effects of the above as if this transaction had occurred as of March 31, 2016.

F-84

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC.

PRO FORMA UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are based upon, and should be read in conjunction with Magnolia’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended DecemberMarch 31:

2020 Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total Gains and (Losses) 
Warrant derivative liabilities        -         -  $2,775  $(3,182)
                 
2019                
Warrant derivative liabilities  -   -  $3,104  $3,160 

F-34

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20152020

NOTE 17: SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and 2014Related Information. This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which management disaggregates the Company in making operating decisions. As of March 31, 2020, and for the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company operated in three segments. The segments are Financial Services (Trend Holdings), Technology (Zest Labs (which includes the operations of 440IoT Inc.)), and Commodities (Banner Midstream). As of March 31, 2019 and for the year ended March 31, 2019, the Company operated in one segment only, so therefore there is no breakout presented for that period. Home office costs are allocated to the three segments based on the relative support provided to those segments.

Year Ended March 31, 2020 Commodities  Financial  Technology  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $233  $175  $173  $581 
Cost of revenues  94   -   165   259 
Gross profit  139   175   8   322 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation, amortization, and impairment  66   729   9,048   9,843 
Depreciation and amortization  4   -   282   286 
Other expense  (17)  -   (2,315)  (2,332)
Loss from continuing operations $52  $(554) $(11,637) $(12,139)
                 
Segmented assets as of March 31, 2020                
Property and equipment, net $3,423  $-  $542  $3,965 
Oil and Gas Properties $6,135  $-  $-  $6,135 
Intangible assets, net $9,353  $3,222  $-  $12,575 
Capital expenditures $-  $-  $-  $- 

NOTE 18: LEASES

The Company has adopted ASU No. 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842), as of April 1, 2019 and will account for their leases in terms of the right of use assets and offsetting lease liability obligations under this pronouncement. The Company had had only short-term leases up through the acquisition of Banner Midstream. The Company acquired a right of use asset and lease liability of $731 and $732, respectively on March 27, 2020. There were no adjustments to these amounts as of March 31, 2020. The Company recorded these amounts at present value, in accordance with the standard, using discount rates ranging between 2.5% and 6.8%. The right of use asset is composed of the sum of all lease payments, at present value, and is amortized straight line over the life of the expected lease term. For the expected term of the lease the Company used the initial terms ranging between 42 and 60 months. Upon the election by the Company to extend the lease for additional years, that election will be treated as a lease modification and the audited consolidatedlease will be reviewed for remeasurement. This lease will be treated as an operating lease under the new standard.

The Company has chosen to implement this standard using the modified retrospective model approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment, which does not require the Company to adjust the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the new guidance on April 1, 2019. The Company has also elected to utilize the transition related practical expedients permitted by the new standard. The modified retrospective approach provides a method for recording existing leases at adoption and in comparative periods that approximates the results of a modified retrospective approach. Adoption of the new standard did not result in an adjustment to retained earnings for the Company.

As of March 31, 2020, the value of the unamortized lease right of use asset is $731. As of March 31, 2020, the Company’s lease liability was $732.

Maturity of Lease Liability for fiscal year ended March 31,
2021 $222 
2022 $191 
2023 $169 
2024 $132 
2025 $18 
     
Total lease payments $732 

F-35

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

Amortization of the right of use asset for fiscal year ended March 31,
2021 $218 
2022 $187 
2023 $168 
2024 $140 
2025 $18 
     
Total lease payments $731 

NOTE 19: ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

In conjunction with the approval permitting the Company to resume drilling in the existing fields, the Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation based upon the plan submitted in connection with the permit. The following table summarizes activity in the Company’s ARO for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:

  2020  2019 
Balance, beginning of year $-  $     - 
Accretion expense  -   - 
ARO liability acquired in Banner Midstream acquisition  295   - 
Reclamation obligations settled  -   - 
Additions and changes in estimates  -   - 
Balance, end of year $295  $- 

NOTE 20: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to March 31, 2020, the Company had the following transactions:

On April 15, 2020, the Company granted 200 warrants with an exercise price of $0.73 per share to extend the maturity date of the Senior Secured Debt acquired in the Banner Midstream acquisition to May 31, 2020.

On April 15, 2020, the Company granted 50 warrants with an exercise price of $0.73 to extend the maturity date of the Senior Secured Debt acquired in the Banner Midstream acquisition to May 31, 2020. The Company does not believe this transaction constitutes an accounting extinguishment of debt due to a material modification of the debt instrument.

On April 15 and 16, 2020, the Company received $438 in proceeds in a loan provided by Trend Discovery SPV I. Since they were the borrower and responsible for repayment of these amounts the Company granted 1,000 warrants at $0.73 for collateral for the loan. In addition, on May 29, 2020, the Company issued 521 shares of common stock in conversion of $380 of loans payable and accrued interest. The conversion was done at $0.73 per share and resulted in a loss on conversion of $1,027.

On April 16, 2020, the Company received $386 in Payroll Protection Program funding related to Ecoark Holdings, and the Company also received on April 13, 2020, $1,482 in Payroll Protection Program funds for Pinnacle Frac LLC, a subsidiary of Banner Midstream.

On May 1, 2020, an institutional investor elected to convert its remaining shares of Series B Preferred shares into 161 common shares.

On April 1 and May 5, 2020, two institutional investors elected to convert their 1 Series C Preferred share into 1,379 common shares.

On May 6, 2020, the Company granted 100 non-qualified stock options to a consultant.

On May 8 and May 14, the Company issued 25 and 35 shares of common stock for the extension of this not and accrued interest valued at $45. The Company recognized a loss of $13 on this issuance and conversion

On May 10, 2020, the Company entered into letter agreements with accredited institutional investors holding 1,379 warrants issued on November 13, 2019 with an exercise price of $0.725 and holding 5,882 warrants with and exercise price of $0.90 (collectively, the “Existing Warrants”). The Existing Warrants have been registered for resale pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-235456). In consideration for the investors exercising in full all of the Existing Warrants on or before May 18, 2020, the Company has agreed to issue the investors new warrants pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to purchase up to a number of shares of common stock equal to 100% of the number of shares issued upon the exercise of the $0.90 warrants pursuant to the warrant exercise , which the new warrants substantially in the form of the original $0.90 warrants, except for the exercise price which will be $1.10. Between May 11, 2020 and May 18, 2020, the Company received $6,294 from the cash exercise of these Existing Warrants.

F-36

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

Between May 11 and June 15, 2020, (a) the Company repaid long-term debt of $2,851 in cash; (b) converted $397 in long-term debt, plus $35 in accrued interest into 592 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $408 on this transaction; (c) repaid $140 in cash and converted $17 of amounts due to prior owners into 23 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $16 on this transaction; (d) converted $200 in long-term debt and $15 in accrued interest into 295 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $213 on this transaction; (e) repaid $3 and converted $507 of a vendor payable into 461 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $161 on this transaction; and (f) repaid $75 in cash and converted $825 in amounts due to prior owners into 1,130 shares of common stock, and recorded a loss on conversion of $350 on this transaction.

On May 26, 2020 the Company issued 5 shares of common stock for the conversion of an accrued expense valued at $4. The Company recognized a loss of $4 on this conversion.

Between May 29, 2020 and June 22, 2020, 319 non-qualified stock options were exercised for proceeds of $203.

Between May 29, 2020 and June 3, 2020, 127 2017 Omnibus stock options were exercised for proceeds of $117.

On June 6, 2020 the Board Compensation Committee approved the modification of an executive’s stock option as allowable by the Company’s 2013 Incentive Stock Option Plan and 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan to amend the strike price of the executive’s 3,363 stock option grant from $2.60 per share to $0.73 per share.

On June 11, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SR Acquisition I, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of 262 total wells in Mississippi and Louisiana, approximately 9,000 acres of active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment. The 262 total wells include 57 active producing wells, 19 active disposal wells, 136 shut-in with future utility wells, and 50 shut-in pending plugging wells. Included in the assignment are 4 wells in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale formation.

On June 18, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SN TMS, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of wells, active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment.

Between June 19 and June 22, 2020, there were 395 warrants exercised for $399. Of these 400 warrants, 187 of them were cashless exercises.

The recent outbreak of COVID-19, which has been declared by the World Health Organization to be a pandemic, has spread across the globe and is impacting worldwide economic activity. A pandemic, including COVID-19, or other public health epidemic poses the risk that the Company or its employees, suppliers, and other partners may be prevented from conducting business activities at full capacity for an indefinite period of time, including due to spread of the disease within these groups or due to shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities. While it is not possible at this time to estimate the impact that COVID-19 could have on the Company’s business, the continued spread of COVID-19 and the measures taken by the governments of countries affected and in which the Company operates could disrupt the operation of the Company’s business. The COVID-19 outbreak and mitigation measures may also have an adverse impact on global economic conditions, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial statementscondition, including on its potential to conduct financings on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. In addition, the Company may take temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of EcoArkthe virus to its employees, including temporarily requiring all employees to work remotely, and discouraging employee attendance at in-person work-related meetings, which could negatively affect the Company’s business. The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak impacts the Company’s results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severity of the virus and the actions to contain its impact.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

The following supplemental unaudited information regarding the Company’s oil and gas activities is presented pursuant to the disclosure requirements of ASC 932. All of the Company’s activities are in the United States.

The Company has performed due diligence in addition to the determination of estimated proved reserves which on one of their leases which has 9,615 acres of oil and gas mineral rights at both shallow and deep levels and identified average recoverable cumulative production of 3,540,000 barrels of oil. This due diligence is not included in any of the amounts provided as of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.

F-37

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

Results of Operations

Results of OperationsMarch 31, 2020March 31, 2019
Sales$-$-
Lease operating costs--
Depletion, accretion and impairment--
$-$-

Since the acquisition of Banner Midstream occurred on March 27, 2020, there were no sales and related costs during the four-day period March 28, 2020 through March 31, 2020.

Reserve Quantity Information

The supplemental unaudited presentation of proved reserve quantities and related standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows provides estimates only and does not purport to reflect realizable values or fair market values of the Company’s reserves. The Company emphasizes that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and that estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise than those of producing oil and gas properties. Accordingly, significant changes to these estimates can be expected as future information becomes available.

Proved reserves are those estimated reserves of crude oil (including condensate and natural gas liquids) and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years ended Decemberfrom known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those expected to be recovered through existing wells, equipment, and operating methods.

Estimated Quantities of Proved Reserves (Mbbl)

Estimated Quantities of Proved ReservesMarch 31,
2020
March 31,
2019
Proved Developed, Producing17     -
Proved Developed, Non-Producing--
Total Proved Developed--
Proved Undeveloped--
Total Proved17-

Petroleum and Natural Gas Reserves

Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and related substances, which by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known resources, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire.

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Reserves

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves and the changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves were prepared in accordance with provisions of ASC 932, “Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas.” Future cash inflows as March 31, 20152020 and 2014,2019 were computed by applying the audited financial statementsunweighted, arithmetic average of Sable asthe closing price on the first day of each month for the twelve month period prior to March 31, 2020 and 2019 to estimated future production. Future production and development costs are computed by estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved oil and natural gas reserves at year-end, based on year-end costs and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions.

Future income tax expenses are calculated by applying appropriate year-end tax rates to future pretax net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves, less the tax basis of properties involved. Future income tax expenses give effect to permanent differences, tax credits and loss carry forwards relating to the proved oil and natural gas reserves. Future net cash flows are discounted at a rate of ten percent annually to derive the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. This calculation procedure does not necessarily result in an estimate of the fair market value of the Company’s oil and natural gas properties.

F-38

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2020

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves for the years ended DecemberMarch 31, 20152020 and 2014,2019 are as follows:

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flow March 31, 2020  March 31, 2019 
       
Future gross revenue $767  $      - 
Less: Future production tax expense  (35)  - 
Future gross revenue after production taxes  732   - 
Less: Future operating costs  (565)  - 
Less: Development costs  (295)  - 
Future net income (loss) before taxes  (128)  - 
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows  40   - 
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (PV10) $(88) $- 

Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows

The changes in the unaudited interim financial statementsstandardized measure of Ecoark Holdings, Inc.future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves for the three monthsyears ended March 31, 2016,2020 and 2019 are as follows:

Change in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flow March 31,
2020
  March 31,
2019
 
       
Balance - beginning $-  $         - 
Net changes in prices and production costs  (412)  - 
Net changes in future development costs  (203)  - 
Sales of oil and gas produced, net  -   - 
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery  -   - 
Purchases of reserves  527   - 
Sales of reserves  -   - 
Revisions of previous quantity estimates  -   - 
Previously estimated development costs incurred  -   - 
Net change income taxes  -   - 
Accretion of discount  -   - 
Balance - ending $(88) $- 

In accordance with SEC requirements, the unaudited financial statementspricing used in the Company’s standardized measure of Sablefuture net revenues in based on the twelve month unweighted arithmetic average of the first day of the month price for the three months endedperiod April through March 31, 2016.

for each period presented and adjusted by lease for transportation fees and regional price differentials. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contain  forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Therefore, our actual resultsuse of SEC pricing rules may vary materially from those discussed herein. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements do not purport to be indicative of actual prices realized by the results that would have been reported had such events actually occurred onCompany in the dates specified, nor is it indicative of our future results.future.

 

F-85

F-39

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Unaudited Proforma Consolidated Balance Sheet
March 31, 2016 (Dollars in Thousands) 

  EARK  SABLE    ADJUSTMENTS  CONSOLIDATED
ASSETS                  
                   
CURRENT ASSETS                  
Cash $8,848  $-   A $7,792    $- $16,640
Accounts receivable, net of allowance  1,421   1,303     -     -  2,724
Inventory, net of reserves  809   1,367     -   B  445  1,731
Prepaid expenses  156   14     -     -  170
Other current assets  -   25     -     -  25
                       
Total current assets  11,234   2,709     7,792     445  21,290
                       
Property and equipment, net  360   1,321   B  1,501     -  3,182
Intangible assets, net  907   -   B  1,028     -  1,935
Goodwill  -   -   B  1,238     -  1,238
Other assets  26   -     -     -  26
                       
Total non-current assets  1,293   1,321     3,767     -  6,381
                       
TOTAL ASSETS $12,527  $4,030    $11,559    $445 $27,671
                       
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)                      
                       
CURRENT LIABILITIES                      
Current portion of long-term debt $3,000  $178     -     - $3,178
Debt - related parties  742   -     -     -  742
Note payable  -   1,500     -     -  1,500
Cash overdraft  -   388     -     -  388
Accounts payable  1,244   615     -     -  1,859
Accounts payable - related parties  -   63     -     -  63
Accrued expenses  687   135     -     -  822
Accrued interest  58   6     -     -  64
Deferred revenue  61   -     -     -  61
                       
Total current liabilities  5,792   2,885     -     -  8,677
                       
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES                      
Long-term debt  -   282     -     -  282
                       
Total non-current liabilities  -   282     -     -  282
                       
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  -   -     -     -  -
                       
Total liabilities  5,792   3,167     -     -  8,959
                       
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Numbers of shares rounded to thousands)                      
                       
Common Stock  31   -     -   B  2  33
                 A  1  1
Additional paid-in-capital  49,897   -     -   B  4,183  54,080
                 A  3,501  3,501
Member's equity  -   863   B  863     -  -
Subscription receivable  (4,290)  -     -   A  4,290  -
Accumulated deficit  (38,810)  -     -     -  (38,810)
                       
Total stockholders' equity before non-controlling interest  6,828   863     863     11,977  18,805
                       
Non-controlling interest  (93)  -     -     -  (93)
                       
Total stockholders' equity  6,735   863     863     11,977  18,712
                       
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $12,527  $4,030    $863    $11,977 $27,671

F-86

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Unaudited Proforma Consolidated Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share)

  EARK  SABLE  ADJUSTMENTS CONSOLIDATED 
               
REVENUES              
Revenue from product sales $1,207  $1,811   C $(575) $2,443 
Revenue from services  757   -     -   757 
   1,964   1,811     (575)  3,200 
                   
COST OF REVENUES                  
Cost of product sales  1,182   1,859   C  (575)  2,466 
Cost of services  277   -     -   277 
   1,459   1,859     (575)  2,743 
                   
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)  505   (48)    -   457 
                   
OPERATING EXPENSES:                  
Salaries and salary related costs, including stock based compensation  1,020   -     -   1,020 
Professional fees and consulting  267   -     -   267 
General and administrative  517   75     -   592 
Depreciation and amortization  75   70   D  86   231 
Research and development  752   -     -   752 
                   
Total operating expenses  2,631   145     86   2,862 
                   
Loss from operations  (2,126)  (193)    (86)  (2,405)
                   
OTHER EXPENSE:                  
Interest expense, net of interest income  (95)  (27)    -   (122)
                   
Loss from before provision for income taxes  (2,221)  (220)    (86)  (2,527)
              ``     
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  -   -     -   - 
                   
NET LOSS  (2,221)  (220)    (86)  (2,527)
                   
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST  2   -     -   2 
                   
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST $(2,223) $(220)   $(86) $(2,529)
                   
NET LOSS PER SHARE                  
Basic $(0.08)           $(0.08)
Diluted $(0.08)           $(0.08)
                   
SHARES USED IN CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE  (Number of shares
 in thousands)
           
Basic  27,847       E  4,574   32,421 
Diluted  27,847       E  4,574   32,421 

F-87

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Unaudited Proforma Consolidated Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2015 (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share)

  Magnolia  EcoArk  Sable  Adjustments Consolidated 
                  
Net Sales $160  $7,868  $14,047  C $(2,181) $19,894 
                       
Cost of Sales  102   6,138   14,635  C  (2,181)  18,694 
                       
Gross Profit (Loss)  58   1,730   (588)    -   1,200 
                       
Operating Expenses                      
Salaries and related expenses  161   3,791   -     -   3,952 
Professional fees  150   3,651   -     -   3,801 
Other general and administrative expenses  37   1,636   305     -   1,978 

Depreciation and amortization

  36   1,226   266   D  343   1,871 
Research and development  -   1,114   -     -   1,114 
                       
Total operating expenses  384   11,418   571     343   12,716 
                       
Total operating income (loss)  (326)  (9,688)  (1,159)    (343)  (11,516)
                       
Other income (loss)  (240)  (785)  (46)    -   (1,071)
                       
Total income (loss) before income taxes  (566)  (10,473)  (1,205)    (343)  (12,587)
                       
Provision for income taxes  -   -   -     -   - 
                       
Net income (loss)  (566)  (10,473)  (1,205)    (343)  (12,587)
                       
Non-controlling interest  -   29   -     -   29 
                       
Net income (loss) - controlling interest $(566) $(10,502) $(1,205)   $(343) $(12,616)
                       
Per share, basic and diluted $(3.29) $(0.36)  -     -  $(0.37)
                       
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in thousands)                      
Basic  172   29,172   -  E  4,574   33,918 
Diluted  172   29,223   -  E  4,574   33,969 

F-88

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF MARCH 31, 2016, FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands except per share)

NOTE A – ACCOUNTING TREATMENT APPLIED AS A RESULT OF THIS TRANSACTION

The acquisition of EcoArk is being accounted for as a reverse merger, whereby EcoArk is considered to be the accounting acquirer. Ecoark Holdings, Inc. acquired the assets and liabilities of Sable Polymer Solutions in exchange for 2,000,000 shares of common stock.

NOTE B – ADJUSTMENTS

(A)To record additional proceeds from a private placement offering for shares of stock and additional issuances of stock for services rendered.

(B)To adjust Sable assets and liabilities to fair value, record intangible assets and the issuance of 2,000,000 shares.

(C)To eliminate sales and cost of sales between entities under common control.

(D)To record the estimated impact on depreciation and amortization expense from the fair value adjustments to property and equipment, net and intangible assets, net.

(E)To record shares issued to Sable’s sole member and other shares issued related to Adjustment (A) above.

F-89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,673,250 Shares of Common Stock

 

 

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS5,882,358 Shares of

 

Common Stock

 

Prospectus datedECOARK HOLDINGS, INC.

PROSPECTUS

July , 20162020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II

 

PART II 

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

 

The following table sets forthindicates the costs and expenses to be incurred in connection with the offering described in this registration statement, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, payable in connection with the registrationall of the common stock hereunder. None of the following expenses are payablewhich will be paid by the selling security holders.us. All amounts are estimates,estimated except the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission registration fee, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA, filing fee and the Nasdaq Capital Market listing fee.

 Amount  Amount
to be Paid
 
SEC registration fee $15,722  $839.88 
Accountants’ fees and expenses  10,000 
Accounting fees and expenses $7,500 
Legal fees and expenses  45,000  $40,000 
Miscellaneous  5,000 
Transfer agent and registrar fees $1,000 
Miscellaneous fees and expenses $2,000 
Total $75,722  $50,844.64 

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

Section 78.138

Nevada Revised Statutes 78.7502 and 78.751 provide broad authority for the indemnification of the NRS provides that a director or officer will not be individually liable unless it is proven that (i) the director’s or officer’s acts or omissions constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties,directors, officers and (ii) such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law.certain other persons.

 

Section 78.7502 of NRSthe Nevada Revised Statutes permits a companycorporation to indemnify its directors and officersany person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if he:

(a)is not liable pursuant to Nevada Revised Statute 78.138, or

(b)acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

In addition, Section 78.7502 permits a corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys’ fees actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he:

(a)is not liability pursuant to Nevada Revised Statute 78.138; or

(b)acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation.

To the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding if the officerreferred to above, or director (i) is not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138in defense of any claim, issue or (ii) acted in good faith and in a manner the officer or director reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests ofmatter, the corporation is required to indemnify him against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and if a criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believereasonably incurred by him in connection with the conduct of the officer or director was unlawful.defense.

 

Section 78.751 of NRS permits athe Nevada company to indemnify its officers and directors againstRevised Statutes provides that such indemnification may also include payment by the Company of expenses incurred by them in defending a civil or criminal action suit or proceeding as they are incurred and in advance of the final disposition thereof,of such action or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the officer or directorperson indemnified to repay such payment if he shall be ultimately found not to be entitled to indemnification under Section 78.751. Indemnification may be provided even though the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that such officer or director is not entitledperson to be indemnified byis no longer a director, officer, employee or agent of the company. Section 78.751 of NRS further permits the company to grant its directors and officers additional rights of indemnification under its articles of incorporationCompany or bylaws or otherwise.such other entities.

 

Section 78.752 of NRS provides thatthe Nevada Revised Statutes allows a Nevada company maycorporation to purchase and maintain insurance or make other financial arrangements on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the company,corporation or is or was serving at the request of the companycorporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another company,corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise for any liability asserted against him and liability and expenses incurred by him in his capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the companycorporation has the authority to indemnify him against such liability and expenses.

Our Articles

II-1

Other financial arrangements made by the corporation pursuant to Section 78.752 may include the following:

(a)the creation of a trust fund;

(b)the establishment of a program of self-insurance;

(c)the securing of its obligations of indemnification by granting a security interest or other lien on any assets of the corporation; and

(d)the establishment of a letter of credit, guaranty or surety.

No financial arrangement made pursuant to Section 78.752 may provide protection for a person adjudged by a court of Incorporation providecompetent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals, to be liable for intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law, except with respect to the advancement of expenses of indemnification ordered by a court.

Any discretionary indemnification pursuant to Section 78.7502 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, unless ordered by a court or advanced pursuant to an undertaking to repay the amount if it is determined by a court that nothe indemnified party is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation, may be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances. The determination must be made:

(a)by the stockholders;

(b)by the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding;

(c)if a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding so orders, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or

(d)if a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding cannot be obtained, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion.

Subsection 7 of Section 78.138 of the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that, subject to certain very limited statutory exceptions, a director or officer of our company will be personallyis not individually liable to our companythe corporation or any of its stockholders or creditors for any damages for breachas a result of fiduciary dutyany act or failure to act in his or her capacity as a director or officer; provided, however,officer, unless it is proven that the foregoing provision shall not eliminateact or limit the liabilityfailure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer (i) for acts or omissions which involveand such breach of those duties involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law. The statutory standard of liability established by Section 78.138 controls even if there is a provision in the corporation’s articles of incorporation unless a provision in the corporation’s articles of incorporation provides for greater individual liability.

Our bylaws provide that each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved (including, without limitation, as a witness) in any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether formal or informal, civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director of or who is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of this or another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, other enterprise, or employee benefit plan (a “covered person”), whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a covered person shall be indemnified and held harmless by us to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, as then in effect, against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees, costs, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and amounts to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith, and such indemnification shall continue as to a person who ceased to be a covered person and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and administrators.

However, no indemnification shall be provided hereunder to any covered person to the extent that such indemnification would be prohibited by Nevada state law or (ii)other applicable law as then in effect, nor, with respect to proceedings seeking to enforce rights to indemnification, shall we indemnify any covered person seeking indemnification in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person except where such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by our board of directors, nor shall we indemnify any covered person who shall be adjudged in any action, suit or proceeding for which indemnification is sought, to be liable for any negligence or intentional misconduct in the unlawful paymentperformance of dividends. In addition, our bylaws permita duty.

Our directors may cause us to purchase and maintain insurance for the indemnificationbenefit of a person who is or was serving as a director, officer, employee or agent of us or of a corporation of which we are or were a stockholder and insurance provisions in Chapter 78 of the NRS.his heirs or personal representatives against a liability incurred by him as a director, officer, employee or agent.

 

Insofar as indemnification by us for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling our companyus pursuant to the foregoing provisions, of our articles of incorporation and bylaws, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC,Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by suchthe registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of usthe registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceedingproceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being offered, weregistered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of ourits counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by usit is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

At the present time, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving a director, officer, employee or other agent of ours in which indemnification would be required or permitted. We are not aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding, which may result in a claim for such indemnification. 

Further, in the normal course of business, we may have in our contracts indemnification clauses, written as either mutual where each party will indemnify, defend, and hold each other harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties; or single where we have agreed to hold certain parties harmless against losses etc. 

Our Bylaws 

Our bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent not prohibited by Nevada law. 

The general effect of the foregoing is to indemnify a control person, officer or director from liability, thereby making us responsible for any expenses or damages incurred by such control person, officer or director in any action brought against them based on their conduct in such capacity, provided they did not engage in fraud or criminal activity. 

II-1

II-2

 

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

From

Dollar amounts and number of shares in this Item 15 are expressed in thousands, except per share amounts.

On May 10, 2020, the Company entered into letter agreements (the “Letter Agreements”) with accredited institutional investors (the “Investors”) holding 1,379 Common Stock Purchase Warrants issued on November 13, 2019 with an exercise price of $0.725 (“$0.725 Warrants”) and holding 5,882,358 Common Stock Purchase Warrants with an exercise price of $0.90 (“$0.90 Warrants and, collectively with the $0.725 Warrants, the “Existing Warrants”). In consideration for the investors exercising in full all of the Existing Warrants (the “Warrant Exercise”) on or before May 18, 2020, the Company has agreed to issue the investors Common Stock Purchase Warrants (“New Warrants”) pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to purchase up to a number of shares of Common Stock equal to 100% the number of shares issued upon the exercise of the $0.90 Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Exercise, which New Warrant shall be substantially in the form of the $0.90 Warrants, except for that the exercise price of the New Warrant shall be equal to $1.10.

Trend Discovery SPV I, LLC

The Company converted all principal and interest in the Trend Discovery SPV I, LLC credit facility, into the Company’s common stock on March 31, 20162020. The conversion includes the issuance of 3,855 shares of common stock at $0.73 per share to April 28, 2016, we sold 4,336,625convert approximately $2.5 million of principal and $0.3 million of accrued interest. The shares were issued to 214 accredited investors through the Private Offering, which raised a total of $17,347. A portion of the proceeds has been used to retire debt with the remainder to be used for working capital purposes. There was no underwriter, no underwriting discounts or commissions, no general solicitation, no advertisement, and resale restrictions are being imposed by placing a Rule 144 legend on the certificate(s). The Company relied on Rule 506 of Regulation Dinvestor without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), forbased upon exemptions from registration provided under Section 4(2) of the offerAct and sale as (i)  the investors were accredited investors; and (ii) the Company did not use general solicitation or advertising to market the securities issued.

On April 28, 2016, the Company issued 625,000 shares to legal and other consultants who advised the Company on the merger.Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The transactionsissuances did not involve any public offering withinoffering. No general solicitation or general advertising was used in connection with the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, since (a) each of the transactions involved the offering of such securities to a substantially limited number of persons; (b) each person took the securities as an investment for his/her/its own account and not with a view to distribution; (c) each person had access to information equivalent to that which would be included in a registration statement on the applicable form under the Securities Act; and (d) each person had knowledge and experience in business and financial matters to understand the merits and risk of the investment.offering.

Banner Energy Services Corp.

 

On May 3, 2016, Ecoark HoldingsMarch 27, 2020, the Company and Banner Energy Services Corp., also a Nevada corporation (“Banner Parent”), entered into a Share ExchangeStock Purchase and Sale Agreement by(the “Purchase Agreement”) to acquire Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner OpCo”). Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner OpCo will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and among Ecoark Holdings, Pioneer Products, LLC, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company (“Sable”), andBanner Parent, the holdersole stockholder of all of Sable’s membership interests. Ecoark Holdings issued 2,000,000Banner OpCo, will receive shares of itsthe Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) in exchange for all of Sable’s membership interests. Sablethe issued and outstanding shares of Banner OpCo.

The Company shall issue 8,945 of Ecoark common stock (which Banner Parent shall issue to certain of its noteholders) and assume up to $11,774 in short-term and long-term debt of Banner OpCo. The Common Stock issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by reason of a specific exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act, which depends, in part, upon the accuracy of the Banner Parent’s representations as expressed in the Purchase Agreement will be “restricted securities” under applicable U.S. federal securities Laws and may be disposed of only pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration under the Securities Act.

Ecoark Holdings Series B Preferred Stock

On August 21, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), the Company and two accredited investors entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the investors an aggregate of 2 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share at a price of $1,000 per share.

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to each investor a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock purchased by the investor. Each Warrant has an exercise price equal to $0.51, subject to full ratchet price only anti-dilution provisions in accordance with the terms of the Warrants (the “Exercise Price”), and is a wholly-owned subsidiaryexercisable for five years after the Effective Date. In addition, if the market price of Pioneer. In connection with the Common Stock on the 11 month anniversary of the closing date of the offering is less than $0.51, holder of the warrants shall be entitled to receive additional shares of common stock based on the number of shares of common stock that would have been issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock had the initial conversion price been equal to the market price at such time (but not less than $0.25) less the number of shares of common stock issued underor issuable upon exercise of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock based on the $0.51 conversion price.

The Company also agreed to amend the current exercise price of the warrants that the investors received in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreements dated March 14, 2017 (the “March Warrants”) and May 22, 2017 (the “May Warrants” and, together with the March Warrants, the “Existing Securities”). The Existing Securities have a current exercise price of $0.59, which was amended from $2.50 on July 12, 2019. The current exercise price for the Existing Securities shall be amended to reduce the exercise price to $0.51 on August 21, 2019, subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of the Existing Securities.

Each share of the Series B Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $1,000 (the “Stated Value”) and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $0.51, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

The Company received gross proceeds from the Private Placement of $2,000, before deducting transaction costs, fees and expenses payable by the Company. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Private Placement to support the Company’s general working capital requirements.

On August 21, 2019, the Company issued 300 shares of common stock to advisors that assisted with the securities purchase agreement and exchange agreement. The value of the 300 shares of common stock which the Company issued on August 21, 2019 to advisors for services were approximately one hundred and fifty thousand U.S. dollars.

On October 15, 2019, nearly all the Series B Preferred Stock shares were converted into 3,761 shares of Common Stock.

II-3

Ecoark Holdings Series C Preferred Stock

On November 11, 2019, the Company and two accredited investors (each an “Investor” and, collectively, the “Investors”) entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the Investors an aggregate of 1 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), at a price of $1,000 per share (the “Private Placement”).

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company reliedissued to each Investor a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock purchased by the Investor. Each Warrant has an exercise price equal to $0.73, subject to full ratchet price only anti-dilution provisions in accordance with the terms of the Warrants (the “Exercise Price”), and is exercisable for five years after the Effective Date. In addition, if the market price of the Common Stock for the five trading days prior to July 22, 2020 is less than $0.73, holder of the warrants shall be entitled to receive additional shares of common stock based on the number of shares of common stock that would have been issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock had the initial conversion price been equal to the market price at such time (but not less than $0.25) less the number of shares of common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock based on the $0.73 conversion price.

Each share of the Series C Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $1,000 (the “Stated Value”) and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $0.73, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

The Company received gross proceeds from the Private Placement of $1,000, before deducting transaction costs, fees and expenses payable by the Company. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Private Placement to support the Company’s general working capital requirements.

The Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock were issued to accredited investors pursuant to Section 4(2)4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended for(the “Securities Act”), and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder.

Other Transactions

No underwriters were involved in the foregoing issuances of securities. The issuances of shares of common stock described in this subsection were issued pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving aany public offering.

 

In the quarter ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 248 shares of common stock for services rendered. Further, in the third quarter ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 247 shares of common stock for services to be rendered in 2020.

The Company issued 300 shares in May 2017 for the acquisition of 440labs valued at $1,500.

The Company issued 300 shares in May 2017 upon the execution of employment agreements with employees of 440labs valued at $1,500 recorded as share-based compensation.

In May 2017, the Company issued 49 shares for the cashless exercise of 100 warrants to a consultant. The remaining 51 shares were forfeited.

On August 9, 2018, the Company entered into an Amendment to Common Stock Warrant with the institutional purchasers in the March 17, 2017 and May 22, 2017 that modified the purchase price of the March 17, 2017 warrants from $5.00 per share to $2.50 per share and modified the purchase price of the May 22, 2017 warrants from $5.50 per share to $2.50 per share. The reductions in the exercise prices resulted in charges resulting from the changes in fair value of the derivative liabilities of $845 and $1,635 for the March 17 and May 22 warrants, respectively. (seeSecurities Purchase Agreements – Institutional Funds on page F-32). The Company issued the shares of its common stock in reliance on exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

On August 14, 2018, the Company completed a private placement agreement related to the issuance and sale of 2,969 shares of common stock that raised $4,221 (net of fees) to institutional investors. The investors also received 2,969 warrants exercisable into common stock at an exercise price of $2.09. The Company also provided 208 warrants at an exercise price of $1.92 to the investment banker in the transaction. The warrants due to certain embedded features that preclude equity treatment are accounted for under liability accounting and are fair valued at each reporting period. The Company uses the Black Scholes option pricing model for determining fair value of the warrants at the end of each period. Of the total net proceeds of $4,221, $2,892 were determined to be warrant liabilities, and $322 of the fees that were considered related to liabilities were charged to other expense. A reduction in the exercise price to $1.34 for the March 16, 2018 and August 14, 2018 warrants resulted in a charge due to the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities of $260. (seeSecurities Purchase Agreements – Institutional Funds on page F-32). The Company issued the shares of its common stock in reliance on exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

II-4

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)                      Exhibits 

(a)Exhibits.

See the Index

The exhibits to Exhibits attached to thisthe registration statement which isare listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are incorporated by reference herein.

(b)                      Financial Statement Schedules 

(b)Financial Statement Schedules.

No financial statement

All other schedules are provided,omitted because they are not required, are not applicable, or the information called for is not required or is shown eitherincluded in the financial statements or the related notes to financial statements thereto.

Item 17. Undertakings.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

1.To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

 

(i) To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; andstatement.

(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.statement;

2.For the purposes

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

3.To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

4.For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act mayof 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be permitteddeemed to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuantbe a new registration statement relating to the provisions above, or otherwise, we have been advisedsecurities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that intime shall be deemed to be the opinioninitial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) To remove from registration by means of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities, other than the payment by uspost-effective amendment any of expenses incurred or paid by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered we will, unless inwhich remain unsold at the opiniontermination of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a courtoffering.

(4) That, for the purpose of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification is against public policy as expressed indetermining liability under the Securities Act and we will be governedof 1933 to any purchaser:

(i) Each prospectus filed by the final adjudicationregistrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of such issue. 

II-2

SIGNATURESthe date the filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration statement; and

 

Pursuant(ii) Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) for the requirementspurpose of providing the information required by section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as amended,of the registrant has duly causedearlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the securities in the registration statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such effective date.

(5) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement on Form S-1 to be signed on its behalfin reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 6th day of July, 2016.

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.
By:/s/ Randy May
Randy May
Chief Executive Officer

Pursuantregistrant pursuant to the requirements ofRule 424(b) (1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of 1933, as amended, this registration statement has been signed byas of the following persons on behalf of theregistrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Randy MayChief Executive Officer and ChairmanJuly 6, 2016
Randy May(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Yash R. Puri

Chief Financial Officer and Director

July 6, 2016
Dr. Yash R. Puri(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
/s/ Greg LandisSecretary and DirectorJuly 6, 2016
Greg Landis
/s/ Gary E. MetzgerDirectorJuly 6, 2016
Gary E. Metzger

time it was declared effective.

 

(6) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

II-3

II-5

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITSItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

 

Exhibit NumberNo.  Description of Exhibit
(2)Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger Agreementby and between Magnolia Solar Corporation, Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corporation and Ecoark Inc. dated as of January 29, 2016, (Incorporatedincorporated by reference to ourExhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the SEC as of February 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
(3)(i) Articles of Incorporation; and (ii) Bylaws
3.1Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on June 13, 2008 (File No. 333-151633).
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 4, 2016)
3.1Articlesas of Incorporation (1)
3.2Certificate of Change (2)January 7, 2010 (File No. 000-53361).
3.3 Amended and Restated Bylaws (2)
3.3.1Amendment to Restated Bylaws (3)
3.4Certificate of Amendment to Articlesof Certificate of Incorporation (4)
3.5Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (5)
4.1 +Magnolia Solar Corporation, 2013 Incentive Stock Plan (Incorporatedincorporated by reference to our Form S-8 filed withExhibit 1.1 to the SEC on February 7, 2013)
5.1*Legal Opinion of Carmel, Milazzo & DiChiara LLP
10.1Termination Agreement and Mutual General Release dated as of March 26, 2015 between Magnolia Solar Corporation, Solar Silicon Resources Group and Auzminerals Resource Group Limited. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2015)
10.2Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into by and between Magnolia Solar Corporation and Ecoark, Inc., dated January 29, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to ourCompany’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 4, 2016)as of March 24, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.33.4 Certificate of Amendment to the Bylaws of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 14, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
3.5Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 28, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
3.6Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock dated as of November 12, 2019, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the SEC as of November 12, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
3.7Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 7, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
(4)Instruments defining the rights of securities holders
4.1Magnolia Solar Corporation 2013 Incentive Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC as of February 7, 2013 (File No. 333-186505)
(5)Opinion re legality
5.1Opinion of Carmel, Milazzo & Feil LLP
(10)Material Contracts
10.1Form of Modification Agreement between Magnolia Solar Corporation and holders of Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Notes and Warrants, (Incorporatedincorporated by reference to our current report on Form 8-K filed withExhibit 10.1 to the SEC on February 4, 2016)
10.4Form of Modification Agreement between Magnolia Solar Corporation and holders of Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Notes and Warrants (Incorporated by reference to ourCompany’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC onas of February 4, 2016)2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.510.2 Form of Subscription Agreement, for Offering (Incorporatedincorporated by reference to ourExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC onas of April 6, 2016)2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.3Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC as of April 29, 2016 (File No. 333-211045).
10.4Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC as of May 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.5Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC as of May 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.6 FormShare Exchange Agreement by and between Pioneer Products, LLC, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC and Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated as of Warrant for Offering (IncorporatedMay 3, 2016, incorporated by reference to ourExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC onas of May 4, 2016)9, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.7 Master License Agreement by and between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc., dated as of April 30, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the SEC as of June 17, 2016 (File No. 333-211045).
10.8Share Exchange Agreement with Sable Polymer Solutions (Incorporatedby and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc., Eco3D, LLC and Ken Smerz and Ted Mort, dated as of September 22, 2016, incorporated by reference to ourExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 9, 2016)as of September 28, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.810.9 Master License Agreement, dated April 30. 2008, between Magnolia Solar,Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc. (Incorporated, incorporated by reference to ourExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form S-1/A8-K filed with the SEC as of January 13, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.10Purchase Agreement by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Reddiamond Partners LLC, dated as of January 13, 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 13, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.11Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 6, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.12Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 14, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 14, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.13Form of Warrant Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated March 14, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 14, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.14Form of Warrant Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated March 31, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various holders of convertible debt, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 3, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).

II-6

10.15Form of Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 10, 2017 by and among Eco3d Acquisition LLC, the Company, and Eco3d LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 14, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.16Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 22, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 23, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.17Form of Warrant Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated May 22, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 23, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.18Exchange Agreement, entered into on May 18, 2017 by and among the Company, Zest Labs, Inc., 440labs, Inc., SphereIt, LLC and certain other parties, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 24, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.19Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective June 13, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated and filed with the SEC on June 17, 2016)14, 2017 (File No. 333-218748).
2110.20 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of June 20, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.21Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of June 20, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.22Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of June 20, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.23Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 14, 2018, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 20, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
10.24Form of Warrant Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated March 14, 2018, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 20, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
10.25Separation Agreement between the Company and Jay Puchir, dated May 11, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 17, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
10.26Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2018, by and among Virterras Materials US LLC, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC, Pioneer Products, LLC, Ecoark, Inc., and Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of August 13, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
10.27Form of Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 28, 2018, by and between Trend Discovery SPV I, LLC and Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 4, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
10.28Form of Exchange Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated October 28, 2019, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and the investor signatory thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of October 28, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
10.29Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of November 12, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
10.30Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2019, by and between Ecoark, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of November 12, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
10.31Securities Purchase Agreement, dated November 11, 2019, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of November 12, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
10.32Form of Letter Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2020, by and between Ecoark, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 30, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
10.33Form of Replacement Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 30, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
10.34Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated March 27, 2020, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Banner Energy Services Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 2, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
10.35Form of Letter Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2020, by and between Ecoark, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 11, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
10.36Form of Replacement Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 11, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
(16)Letter re change in certifying accountant
16.1Letter from KBL, LLP dated November 19, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of November 19, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).

II-7

(21)Subsidiaries of the Registrant
21.1List of Subsidiaries
23.1#(23) ConsentConsents of KBL LLPExperts and Counsel
23.2*23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
23.2Consent of Carmel, Milazzo & DiChiaraFeil LLP (included(contained in Exhibit 5.1).
24.1(99) Power of Attorney (included on signature page) (IncorporatedAdditional Exhibits
99.1Press Release dated August 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Registration StatementExhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form S-18-K/A filed with the CommissionSEC as of August 1, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
99.2Press Release dated March 13, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 15, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
99.3Press Release dated November 11, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of November 12, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
99.4Press Release dated January 27, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 30, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
99.5Press Release dated March 31, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 29, 2015)2, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
99.6Press Release dated April 6, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 7, 2020 (File No. 000-53361).
(101)Interactive Data Files
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentsDocument
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

II-8

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Frisco, State of Texas, on July 2, 2020.

*To be filed by amendmentEcoark Holdings, Inc.
#Filed herewith
+Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan(Registrant)
  
(1)Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on June 13, 2008.By:/s/ RANDY S. MAY
(2)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2010.Randy S. May
(3)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 14, 2016.

Chief Executive Officer
(4)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 7, 2010.
(5)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2016.(Principal Executive Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: July 2, 2020By:/s/ RANDY S. MAY
Randy S. May
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: July 2, 2020By:/s/ WILLIAM B. HOAGLAND
William B. Hoagland
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: July 2, 2020By:/s/ STEVEN K. NELSON
Steven K. Nelson
Director
Date: July 2, 2020By:/s/ PETER A. MEHRING
Peter A. Mehring
Director
Date: July 2, 2020By:/s/ GARY M. METZGER
Gary M. Metzger
Director
Date: July 2, 2020By:/s/ JOHN P. CAHILL
John P. Cahill
Director

 

II-4II-9